UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549




Form 10-K

(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019


or


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from to


Commission fileFile no. 1-7615
1-07615



Kirby CorporationCorporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Nevada74-1884980
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
55 Waugh Drive, Suite 1000 
Houston, Texas77007
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(713) 435-1000


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of Each Classeach classTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchangeeach exchange on Which Registeredwhich registered
Common Stock — $.10 Par Value Per ShareKEXNew York Stock Exchange LLC


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  No






Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted  and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter)during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company”in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
    
Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company



If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No

The aggregate market value of common stock held by nonaffiliatesnon-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2016,2019, based on the closing sales price of such stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2016,2019, was $3,278,025,000.$4,675,308,000. For purposes of this computation, all executive officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed an admission that such executive officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners are affiliates.


As of February 22, 2017, 53,957,00020, 2020, 59,984,000 shares of common stock were outstanding.



DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The

Portions of the Company’s definitive proxy statement in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 25, 2017,28, 2020, to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, isare incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
2



KIRBY CORPORATION
20162019 FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS


Page
PART I 
4
4
4
5
6
7
7
89
9
910
10
1112
1415
15
15
1516
1617
18
19
20
20
20
20
21
21
21
2122
22
2223
2223
2224
2526
3133
3133
3233
3334
PART II 
3435
35
3536
6063
6063
6064
6064
PART III 
6165
PART IV 
97105
3

PART I


Item 1.Business


THE COMPANY


Kirby Corporation (the “Company”) is the nation’s largest domestic tank barge operator, transporting bulk liquid products throughout the Mississippi River System, on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, coastwise along all three United States coasts, and in Alaska and Hawaii. The Company transports petrochemicals, black oil, refined petroleum products and agricultural chemicals by tank barge. The Company also operates sixfour offshore dry-bulk cargo barges, sixfour offshore tugboats and one docking tugboat transporting dry-bulk commodities in the United States coastal trade. Through its diesel enginedistribution and services segment, the Company provides after-market servicesservice and parts for medium-speed and high-speed diesel engines, transmissions, reduction gears, and ancillary products forrelated equipment used in oilfield services, marine, and power generation, applications, distributeson-highway and services high-speed diesel engines, transmissionsother industrial applications. The Company also rents equipment including generators, industrial compressors, railcar movers, and pumps,high capacity lift trucks for use in a variety of industrial markets, and manufactures and remanufactures oilfield service equipment, including pressure pumping units, for the land-based oilfield service and oil and gas operator and producer markets.customers.


Unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to the Company include the Company and its subsidiaries.


The Company’s principal executive office is located at 55 Waugh Drive, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77007, and its telephone number is (713) 435-1000. The Company’s mailing address is P.O. Box 1745, Houston, Texas 77251-1745. Kirby Corporation is a Nevada corporation and was incorporated in 1969 although the history of the Company goes back to 1921.


Documents and Information Available on Web SiteWebsite


The Internet address of the Company’s web sitewebsite is http://www.kirbycorp.com. The Company makes available free of charge through its web site,website, all of its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including its annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reportsQuarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, current reportsCurrent Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.


The following documents are available on the Company’s web sitewebsite in the Investor Relations section under Corporate Governance:


Audit Committee Charter


Compensation Committee Charter


Governance Committee Charter


Business Ethics Guidelines


Corporate Governance Guidelines


The Company is required to make prompt disclosure of any amendment to or waiver of any provision of its Business Ethics Guidelines that applies to any director or executive officer or to its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions. The Company will make any such disclosure that may be necessary by posting the disclosure on its web sitewebsite in the Investor Relations section under Corporate Governance.

4



BUSINESS AND PROPERTY


The Company, through its subsidiaries, conducts operations in two reportable business segments: marine transportation and diesel enginedistribution and services.


The Company, through its marine transportation segment, is a provider of marine transportation services, operating tank barges and towing vessels transporting bulk liquid products throughout the Mississippi River System, on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, coastwise along all three United States coasts, and in Alaska and Hawaii. The Company transports petrochemicals, black oil, refined petroleum products and agricultural chemicals by tank barge. The Company operates offshore dry-bulk barge and tugboat units engaged in the offshore transportation of dry-bulk cargoes in the United States coastal trade. The segment is a provider of transportation services for its customers and, in almost all cases, does not assume ownership of the products that it transports. All of the Company’s vessels operate under the United States flag and are qualified for domestic trade under the Jones Act.


The Company, through its diesel enginedistribution and services segment, sells genuine replacement parts, provides service mechanics to overhaul and repair medium-speed and high-speed diesel engines, transmissions, reduction gears and pumps,related oilfield services equipment, rebuilds component parts or entire diesel engines, transmissions and reduction gears, and related equipment used in oilfield services, marine, power generation, on-highway and other industrial applications. The Company also rents equipment including generators, industrial compressors, railcar movers and high capacity lift trucks for use in a variety of industrial markets, and manufactures and remanufactures oilfield service equipment, including pressure pumping units. The Company primarily services the marine, power generation and theunits, for land-based oilfield service and oil and gas operator and producer markets.customers.


The Company and its marine transportation and diesel engine services segments havehas approximately 4,0005,700 employees, substantially allthe large majority of whom are in the United States.

The following table sets forth by segment the revenues, operating profits and identifiable assets attributable to the principal activities of the Company for the years indicated (in thousands):

  2016  2015  2014 
Revenues from unaffiliated customers:         
Marine transportation $1,471,893  $1,663,090  $1,770,684 
Diesel engine services  298,780   484,442   795,634 
Consolidated revenues $1,770,673  $2,147,532  $2,566,318 
             
Operating profits:            
Marine transportation $257,102  $374,842  $429,864 
Diesel engine services  3,186   18,921   60,063 
General corporate expenses  (14,966)  (14,773)  (14,896)
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets  (127)  1,672   781 
   245,195   380,662   475,812 
Equity in earnings of affiliates  532   451   384 
Other expense  (291)  (663)  (345)
Interest expense  (17,690)  (18,738)  (21,461)
Earnings before taxes on income $227,746  $361,712  $454,390 
             
Identifiable assets:            
Marine transportation $3,622,348  $3,451,553  $3,317,696 
Diesel engine services  628,290   637,549   736,129 
   4,250,638   4,089,102   4,053,825 
Investment in affiliates  2,622   2,090   2,539 
General corporate assets  50,239   61,089   81,250 
Consolidated assets $4,303,499  $4,152,281  $4,137,614 

5



MARINE TRANSPORTATION


The marine transportation segment is primarily a provider of transportation services by tank barge for the inland and coastal markets. As of February 22, 2017,December 31, 2019, the equipment owned or operated by the marine transportation segment consisted of 8761,053 inland tank barges with 17.923.4 million barrels of capacity, 230299 inland towboats, 6949 coastal tank barges with 6.24.7 million barrels of capacity, 7547 coastal tugboats, sixfour offshore dry-bulk cargo barges, sixfour offshore tugboats and one docking tugboat with the following specifications and capacities:


Class of equipment 
Number in
class
  
Average age
(in years)
  
Barrel
capacities
  
Number in
class
 
Average age
(in years)
 
Barrel
capacities
 
Inland tank barges (owned and leased):                
Regular double hull:                
20,000 barrels and under  362   13.4   4,128,000  368 13.0 4,291,000 
Over 20,000 barrels  454   12.8   12,841,000  637 12.2 18,279,000 
Specialty double hull  60   38.9   910,000   48  38.5  816,000 
Total inland tank barges  876   14.9   17,879,000   1,053  13.7  23,386,000 
                   
Inland towboats (owned and chartered):                   
800 to 1300 horsepower  71   39.1      47 39.4   
1400 to 1900 horsepower  72   34.0      49 29.8   
2000 to 2400 horsepower  56   12.1      158 10.3   
2500 to 3200 horsepower  18   34.3      28 13.0   
3300 to 4800 horsepower  10   36.8      14 29.2   
Greater than 5000 horsepower  1   36.0       3  30.0   
Spot charters (chartered trip to trip)  2       
Total inland towboats  230   30.5       299  19.6   
                   
Coastal tank barges (owned and leased):                   
Double hull:            
30,000 barrels and under  8   20.2   190,000  2 25.9 37,000 
50,000 to 70,000 barrels  13   15.5   654,000  9 14.4 437,000 
80,000 to 90,000 barrels  24   13.2   1,984,000  19 15.4 1,586,000 
100,000 to 110,000 barrels  6   10.5   630,000  6 13.5 630,000 
120,000 to 150,000 barrels  9   19.5   1,132,000  5 20.8 648,000 
Over 150,000 barrels  9   17.7   1,566,000   8  8.7  1,365,000 
Total coastal tank barges  69   15.6   6,156,000   49  14.9  4,703,000 
                   
Coastal tugboats (owned and chartered):                   
1000 to 1900 horsepower  8   31.1      4 31.5   
2000 to 2900 horsepower  6   33.2      1 44.1   
3000 to 3900 horsepower  17   35.8      7 37.2   
4000 to 4900 horsepower  19   24.5      11 15.1   
5000 to 6900 horsepower  13   25.5      14 9.1   
Greater than 7000 horsepower  12   19.9       10  15.2   
Total coastal tugboats  75   27.9       47  18.2   

         
Deadweight
Tonnage
      
Deadweight
Tonnage
 
Offshore dry-bulk cargo barges (owned)  6   22.9   111,000   4  21.1  67,000 
                   
Offshore tugboats and docking tugboat (owned and chartered) ��7   30.5       5  28.5   

6



The 230299 inland towboats, 7547 coastal tugboats, sixfour offshore tugboats and one docking tugboat provide the power source and the 8761,053 inland tank barges, 6949 coastal tank barges and sixfour offshore dry-bulk cargo barges provide the freight capacity for the marine transportation segment. When the power source and freight capacity are combined, the unit is called a tow. The Company’s inland tows generally consist of one towboat and from one to up to 25 tank barges, depending upon the horsepower of the towboat, the river or canalwaterway infrastructure capacity and conditions, and customer requirements. The Company’s coastal and offshore tows primarily consist of one tugboat and one tank barge or dry-bulk cargo barge.


Marine Transportation Industry Fundamentals


The United States inland waterway system, composed of a network of interconnected rivers and canals that serve the nation as water highways, is one of the world’s most efficient transportation systems. The nation’s inland waterways are vital to the United States distribution system, with over 1.1 billion short tons of cargo moved annually on United States shallow draft waterways. The inland waterway system extends approximately 26,000 miles, 12,000 miles of which are generally considered significant for domestic commerce, through 38 states, with 635 shallow draft ports. These navigable inland waterways link the United States heartland to the world.


The United States coastal waterway system consists of ports along the Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific coasts, as well as ports in Alaska, Hawaii and on the Great Lakes. Like the inland waterways, the coastal trade is vital to the United States distribution system, particularly the regional distribution of refined petroleum products from refineries and storage facilities to a variety of destinations, including other refineries, distribution terminals, power plants and ships. In addition to distribution directly from refineries and storage facilities, coastal tank barges are used frequently to distribute products from pipelines. Many coastal markets receive refined petroleum products principally from coastal tank barges. Smaller volumes of petrochemicals are distributed from Gulf Coast plants to end users and black oil, including crude oil and natural gas condensate, is distributed regionally from refineries and terminals along the United States coast to refineries, power plants and distribution terminals.


Based on cost and safety, barge transportation is often the most efficient and safest means of transportingsurface transportation of bulk commodities when compared with railroads and trucks. The cargo capacity of a 27,500 barrel inland tank barge is the equivalent of 46 railroad tank cars or 144 tractor-trailer tank trucks. A typical Company lower Mississippi River linehaul tow of 15 barges has the carrying capacity of approximately 216 railroad tank cars plus six locomotives, or approximately 1,050 tractor-trailer tank trucks. The Company’s inland tank barge fleet capacity of 17.923.4 million barrels equates to approximately 30,00039,100 railroad tank cars or approximately 93,600122,500 tractor-trailer tank trucks. Furthermore, barging is much more energy efficient. One ton of bulk product can be carried 616647 miles by inland barge on one gallon of fuel, compared with 478477 miles by railcar or 150145 miles by truck. In the coastal trade, the carrying capacity of a 100,000 barrel tank barge is the equivalent of approximately 165 railroad tank cars or approximately 525 tractor-trailer tank trucks. The Company’s coastal tank barge fleet capacity of 6.24.7 million barrels equates to approximately 10,2007,900 railroad tank cars or approximately 32,30024,600 tractor-trailer tank trucks.

Tank barge transportation is safer than most modes of transportation in the United States. Marine transportation generally involves less urban exposure than railroad or truck transportation and operates on a system with few crossing junctures and in areas relatively remote from population centers. These factors generally reduce both the number and impact of waterway incidents.


Inland Tank Barge Industry


The Company operates within the United States inland tank barge industry, a diverse and independent mixture of approximately 30 large integrated transportation companies and small operators, as well as captive fleets owned by United States refining and petrochemical companies. The inland tank barge industry provides marine transportation of bulk liquid cargoes for customers and, in the case of captives, for their own account, throughout the Mississippi River and its tributaries and on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The most significant markets in this industry include the transportation of petrochemicals, black oil, refined petroleum products and agricultural chemicals. The Company operates in each of these markets. The use of marine transportation by the petroleum and petrochemical industry is a major reason for the location of United States refineries and petrochemical facilities on navigable inland waterways. Texas and Louisiana currently account for approximately 80% of the United States production of petrochemicals. Much of the United States farm belt is likewise situated with access to the inland waterway system, relying on marine transportation of farm products, including agricultural chemicals. The Company’s principal distribution system encompasses the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Brownsville, Texas, to Port St. Joe, Florida, the Mississippi River System and the Houston Ship Channel. The Mississippi River System includes the Arkansas, Illinois, Missouri, Ohio, Red, Tennessee, Yazoo, Ouachita and Black Warrior Rivers and the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway.

7



The number of tank barges that operate on the inland waterways of the United States declined from an estimated 4,200 in 1982 to 2,900 in 1993, remained relatively constant at 2,900 until 2002, decreased to 2,750 from 2002 through 2006, and then increased over the years to approximately 3,850 by the end of 2016.2015 and 2016, and slightly decreased to an estimated 3,825 at the end of 2017 and an estimated 3,800 at the end of 2018 and increased slightly to an estimated 3,850 at the end of 2019. The Company believes the decrease from 4,200 in 1982 to 2,750 in 2006 primarily resulted from: the increasing age of the domestic tank barge fleet, resulting in scrapping; rates inadequate to justify new construction; a reduction in tax incentives, which previously encouraged speculative construction of new equipment; stringent operating standards to adequately cope with safety and environmental risk; the elimination of government regulations and programs supporting the many new small refineries and athe proliferation of oil traders which created a strong demand for tank barge services; an increase in the average capacity per barge; and an increase in environmental regulations that mandate expensive equipment modification, which some owners were unwilling or unable to undertake given capital constraints and the age of their fleets. The cost of tank barge hull work for required periodic United States Coast Guard (“USCG”) certifications, as well as general safety and environmental concerns, force operators to periodically reassess their ability to recover maintenance costs. The increase from 2,750 in 2006 to approximately 3,850 by the end of 2016 primarily resulted from increased barge construction and deferred retirements due to strong demand and resulting capacity shortages. The number of industry tank barges has remained relatively constant from 2016 through the end of 2019. The Company’s 8761,053 inland tank barges represent approximately 23%27% of the industry’s 3,850 inland tank barges.


For 2014,2017 and 2018, the Company estimated that industry-wide 30075 tank barges were placed in service and 100 tank barges were retired.retired each year. For 2015,2019, the Company estimated that industry-wide 260 tank barges were placed in service and 60 tank barges were retired. For 2016, the Company estimated that industry-wide 100150 tank barges were placed in service and 100 tank barges were retired. During 2015 and 2016,2017, the decline in industry-wide demand for the movement of crude oil and natural gas condensate, and the subsequent transfer of inland crude oil barges to other tank barge markets, created some excess industry-wide tank barge capacity. During 2018 and 2019, demand for inland tank barge transportation and industry utilization rates increased above 90% due to a favorable pricing environment for customers’ products, new petrochemical industry capacity that led to increased movements of petrochemicals, and higher volumes of crude oil moved from the northern U.S. to the Gulf Coast. As a result of these improved market conditions, the Company estimates that approximately 40150 tank barges were ordered during 2016 for delivery throughout 2017 and many older tank barges will be retired, dependent on 2017 market conditions.2019. The risk of an oversupply of tank barges may be mitigated by continued increased petrochemical, black oil and refined petroleum products volumes from increased production from current facilities, plant expansions or the opening of new facilities, and the fact that the inland tank barge industry has a mature fleet, with approximately 600350 tank barges over 30 years old and approximately 270240 of those are over 40 years old, which maycould lead to retirement of older tank barges.

The average age of the nation’s inland tank barge fleet is approximately 15 years. Neither the Company, nor the industry, operates any single hull inland tank barges. Single hull tank barges were required by current federal law to either be retrofitted with double hulls or phased out of domestic service by December 31, 2014.


The Company’s inland marine transportation segment also owns a shifting operation and fleeting facility for dry cargo barges and tank barges on the Houston Ship Channel and in Freeport, Texas, and a shipyard for the building of inland towboats and providing routine maintenance on marine vessels. The Company also owns a two-thirds interest in Osprey Line, L.L.C. (“Osprey”), a transporter of project cargoes and cargo containers by barge on the United States inland waterway system.

8



Coastal Tank Barge Industry


The Company also operates in the United States coastal tank barge industry, operating tank barges in the 195,000 barrel or less category. This market is composed of approximately 1520 large integrated transportation companies and small operators. The 195,000 barrel or less category coastal tank barge industry primarily provides regional marine transportation distribution of bulk liquid cargoes along the United States’ Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific coasts, in Alaska and Hawaii and, to a lesser extent, on the Great Lakes. Products transported are primarily refined petroleum products and black oil from refineries and storage facilities to a variety of destinations, including other refineries, distribution terminals, power plants and ships, the regional movement of crude oil and natural gas condensate to Gulf Coast, Northeast and West Coast refineries, and the movement of petrochemicals primarily from Gulf Coast petrochemical facilities to end users.
8


The number of coastal tank barges that operate in the 195,000 barrel or less category is approximately 295,280, of which the Company operates 6949 or approximately 23%18%. The average age of the nation’s coastal tank barge fleet is approximately 1413 years. In June 2018, the Company purchased a 155,000 barrel coastal articulated tank barge and tugboat unit (“ATB”) under construction from another operator that was delivered to the Company in the 2018 fourth quarter. The Company is aware of four coastal ATBs under construction by competitors for delivery in 2020 and 2021, including two that are in the 195,000 barrels or less category and two that are over 195,000 barrels. The coastal tank barge fleet is also mature, withhas approximately 3520 tank barges over 3025 years old and approximately 30 of those over 35 years old, which may lead to the retirementold. The number of older tank barges.barges, coupled with low industry-wide utilization levels and ballast water treatment regulations, could lead to further retirements of older tank barges in the next few years.


Competition in the Tank Barge Industry


The tank barge industry remains very competitive. Competition in this business has historically beenis based primarily on price; however, mostprice and reliability, and with many of the industry’s customers throughemphasis on enhanced vetting requirements, an increased emphasis on safety, the environment, quality and a trend toward a “single source” supply of services, are morequality, frequently requiring that their supplier of tank barge services have the capability to handle a variety of tank barge requirements. These requirements include distribution capability throughout the inland waterway system and coastal markets, with high levels of flexibility, and an emphasis on safety, environmental responsibility and financial responsibility, as well as adequate insurance and high quality of service consistent with the customer’s own operational standards.


In the inland markets, the Company’s direct competitors are primarily noncaptive inland tank barge operators. “Captive” fleets are owned by major oil and petrochemical companies which occasionally compete in the inland tank barge market, but primarily transport cargoes for their own account. The Company is the largest inland tank barge carrier, both in terms of number of barges and total fleet barrel capacity. The Company’s inland tank barge fleet has grown from 71 tank barges in 1988 to 8761,053 tank barges as of February 22, 2017,December 31, 2019, or approximately 23%27% of the estimated total number of domestic inland tank barges.


In the coastal markets, the Company’s direct competitors are the operators of United States tank barges in the 195,000 barrels or less category. Coastal tank barges in the 195,000 barrels or less category have the ability to enter the large majority of coastal ports. Ocean-going tank barges and United States product tankers in the 300,000 barrels plus category, excluding the fleet of large tankers dedicated to Alaska crude oil transportation, primarily move large volumes of refined petroleum products within the Gulf of Mexico with occasional movements from the Gulf Coast to the East Coast, along the West Coast and from Texas and Louisiana to Florida. There are approximately 6045 such vessels and, because of their size, their access to ports is limited by terminal size and draft restrictions.


While the Company competes primarily with other tank barge companies, it also competes with companies who operate refined product and petrochemical pipelines, railroad tank cars and tractor-trailer tank trucks. As noted above, the Company believes that both inland and coastal marine transportation of bulk liquid products enjoy a substantial cost advantage over railroad and truck transportation. The Company believes that refined product and crude oil pipelines, although often a less expensive form of transportation than inland and coastal tank barges, are not as adaptable to diverse products and are generally limited to fixed point-to-point distribution of commodities in high volumes over extended periods of time.


9



Products Transported


The Company transports petrochemicals, black oil, refined petroleum products and agricultural chemicals by tank barge throughout the Mississippi River System, on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, coastwise along all three United States coasts and in Alaska and Hawaii. During 2016,2019, the Company’s inland marine transportation operation moved over 4550 million tons of liquid cargo on the United States inland waterway system.

9

Petrochemicals. Bulk liquid petrochemicals transported include such products as benzene, styrene, methanol, acrylonitrile, xylene, naphtha and caustic soda, all consumed in the production of paper, fiber and plastics. Pressurized products, including butadiene, isobutane, propylene, butane and propane, all requiring pressurized conditions to remain in stable liquid form, are transported in pressure barges. The transportation of petrochemical products represented 49%54% of the segment’s 20162019 revenues. Customers shipping these products are petrochemical and refining companies.


Black Oil. Black oil transported includes such products as residual fuel oil, No. 6 fuel oil, coker feedstock, vacuum gas oil, asphalt, carbon black feedstock, crude oil, natural gas condensate and ship bunkers (engine fuel). Such products represented 25%23% of the segment’s 20162019 revenues. Black oil customers are refining companies, marketers and end users that require the transportation of black oil between refineries and storage terminals, to refineries and to power plants. Ship bunker customers are oil companies and oil traders in the bunkering business.


Refined Petroleum Products. Refined petroleum products transported include the various blends of finished gasoline, gasoline blendstocks, jet fuel, No. 2 oil, heating oil and diesel fuel, and represented 23%19% of the segment’s 20162019 revenues. The Company also classifies ethanol in the refined petroleum products category. Customers are oil and refining companies, marketers and ethanol producers.


Agricultural Chemicals. Agricultural chemicals transported represented 3%4% of the segment’s 20162019 revenues. Agricultural chemicals include anhydrous ammonia and nitrogen-based liquid fertilizer, as well as industrial ammonia. Agricultural chemical customers consist mainly of domestic and foreign producers of such products.


Demand Drivers in the Tank Barge Industry


Demand for tank barge transportation services is driven by the production volumes of the bulk liquid commodities transported by barge. Marine transportation demand for the segment’s four primary commodity groups, petrochemicals, black oil, refined petroleum products and agricultural chemicals, is based on differing circumstances. While the demand drivers of each commodity are different, the Company has the flexibility, in certain cases, of re-allocatingreallocating inland equipment and coastal equipment betweenamong the petrochemical, refined petroleum products and crude oil markets as needed.


Bulk petrochemical volumes have historically tracked the general domestic economy and correlate to the United States Gross Domestic Product. The United States petrochemical industry continues to see strong production levels for both domestic consumption and exports. Low priced domestic natural gas, a basic feedstock for the United States petrochemical industry, has provided the industry with a competitive advantage against foreign petrochemical producers. As a result, United States petrochemical production has remained stable during 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, thereby producing increased marine transportation volumes of basic petrochemicals to both domestic consumers and terminals for export destinations. Petrochemical products are used primarily in consumer non-durable and durable goods. From late 2010 through 2015, inland petrochemical tank barge utilization remained relatively stable in the 90% to 95% range. During 2016, utilization declined slightly to the high 80% range on average with periods of utilization in the low 80% range. During 2017 and 2018, utilization ranged from the mid-80% to the mid-90% range, reaching the mid-90% range in the late 2017 third quarter from the impact of Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, and in the low to mid-90% range during the 2017 fourth quarter and the majority of 2018 and 2019 as a result of a favorable pricing environment for customers’ products, new petrochemical industry capacity that led to increased movements of petrochemicals, and the continued retirement of older barges from the segment’s fleet.  Extensive delay days due to poor operating conditions which slowed transport of customer cargoes, also contributed to increased utilization during the first half of 2019. Coastal tank barge utilization for the transportation of petrochemicals during 2016 was2017 ranged from the low 60% to low 80%. During 2018, coastal tank barge utilization levels ranged improved from the high 70% range in the 2018 first quarter to the 80% range during the 2018 last nine months and the low 90% range.to mid-80% range during 2019, reflecting the retirement of 12 out-of-service coastal barges during the 2017 fourth quarter and improved customer demand resulting in higher utilization of spot market capacity in 2019. Utilization in the coastal marine fleet continued to be impacted by the oversupply of smaller tank barges in the coastal market.

10



The demand for black oil, including ship bunkers, varies by type of product transported. Demand for transportation of residual oil, a heavy by-product of refining operations, varies with refinery utilization and usage of feedstocks. During the majority of 2015, and all of 2014, inland black oil tank barge utilization remained strong, in the 90% to 95% range, due to strong demand driven by steady refinery production levels from major customers, and the export of diesel fuel and heavy fuel oil. With the decline in the price of crude oil in late 2014 and the low price throughout 2015 and 2016, movements by tank barge of crude oil and natural gas condensate movements by tank barge were at reduced levels industry-wide. During 2015 and 2016, the Company and the industry were generally successful in movingrepositioning barges from that trade to other markets. During 2016,2017, 2018 and 2019, the Company continued to transport crude oil and natural gas condensate produced from the Eagle Ford and Permian Basin shale formations in Texas both along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway with inland vessels and in the Gulf of Mexico with coastal equipment, and continued to transport Utica crude oil and natural gas condensate downriver from the Mid-Atlantic to the Gulf Coast, however, at reduced levels.levels as some of the product was transported by newly constructed pipelines. The decline in demand for crude oil and natural gas condensate movements and an industry-wide oversupply of inland tank barges resulted in a decline in inland black oil tank barge utilization in 2016in 2017 to the low-to-mid 80% range.mid-80% to low 90% range for the first three quarters and low to mid-90% range for the fourth quarter. During 2018, inland black oil tank barge utilization was in the mid-90% range, and increased into the mid-to high 90% range during 2019. Coastal black oil tank barge utilization declined from the 90% to 95% range for the majority of 2015 and all of 2014 to the low 80% range by the end of 2016, the low 60% to low 80% range during 2017 and low to mid-80% range during 2018 and the low 90% range during 2019, partly attributable to the decrease in the movements of crude oil and natural gas condensate alongand to the Gulf Coast.continued industry-wide oversupply of smaller tank barges in the coastal industry. Inland and coastal asphalt shipments are generally seasonal, with higher volumes shipped during April through November, months when weather allows for efficient road construction. The Company saw seasonally normal cessation of most operations in Alaska in the 20162017, 2018 and 2019 first and fourth quarter reduced coastal tank barge utilization, but the decline was partially offset by seasonal improvement in winter heating oil demand in the Northeast. quarters.

Refined petroleum product volumes are driven by United States gasoline and diesel fuel consumption, principally vehicle usage, air travel and weather conditions. Volumes can also relate to gasoline inventory imbalances within the United States. Generally, gasoline and No. 2 oil are exported from the Gulf Coast where refining capacity exceeds demand. The Midwest is a net importer of such products. Volumes were also driven by diesel fuel transported to terminals along the Gulf Coast for export to South America. Ethanol, produced in the Midwest, is moved from the Midwest to Gulf Coast customers. In the coastal trade, tank barges are frequently used regionally to transport refined petroleum products from a coastal refinery or terminals served by pipelines to the end markets. Many coastal areas have access to refined petroleum products only by using marine transportation as the last link in the distribution chain. Coastal refined petroleum products tank barge utilization declined from the 90% to 95% range for the majority of 2015 to the low-to-mid 80% range for the majority of 2016.2016, and declined throughout 2017 from a low 80% range in first quarter to the low 60% range in the fourth quarter, all predominately from the industry-wide oversupply of coastal tank barge capacity. In 2018 and 2019, utilization increased into the 80% range primarily due to the retirement of out-of-service coastal barges during the 2017 fourth quarter and improved customer demand resulting in higher utilization of spot market capacity in 2019.


Demand for marine transportation of domestic and imported agricultural fertilizer is seasonal and directly related to domestic nitrogen-based liquid fertilizer consumption, driven by the production of corn, cotton and wheat. During periods of high natural gas prices, the manufacturing of nitrogen-based liquid fertilizer in the United States is curtailed. During these periods, imported products, which normally involve longer barge trips, replace the domestic products to meet Midwest and southSouth Texas demands. Such products are delivered to the numerous small terminals and distributors throughout the United States farm belt.


11



Marine Transportation Operations


The marine transportation segment operates a fleet of 8761,053 inland tank barges and 230299 inland towboats, as well as 6949 coastal tank barges and 7547 coastal tugboats. The segment also operates sixfour offshore dry-bulk cargo barges, sixfour offshore tugboats and one docking tugboat transporting dry-bulk commodities in United States coastal trade.


Inland Operations. The segment’s inland operations are conducted through a wholly owned subsidiary, Kirby Inland Marine, LP (“Kirby Inland Marine”). Kirby Inland Marine’s operations consist of the Canal, Linehaul and River fleets, as well as barge fleeting services.


The Canal fleet transports petrochemical feedstocks, processed chemicals, pressurized products, black oil, and refined petroleum products along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, the Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and the Houston Ship Channel. Petrochemical feedstocks and certain pressurized products are transported from one plant to another plant for further processing. Processed chemicals and certain pressurized products are moved to waterfront terminals and chemical plants. Black oil is transported to waterfront terminals and products such as No. 6 fuel oil are transported directly to the end users. Refined petroleum products are transported to waterfront terminals along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway for distribution.
11


The Linehaul fleet transports petrochemical feedstocks, chemicals, agricultural chemicals and lube oils along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Mississippi River and the Illinois and Ohio Rivers. Loaded tank barges are staged in the Baton Rouge area from Gulf Coast refineries and petrochemical plants, and are transported from Baton Rouge, Louisiana to waterfront terminals and plants on the Mississippi, Illinois and Ohio Rivers, and along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, on regularly scheduled linehaul tows. Barges are dropped off and picked up going up and down river.


The River fleet transports petrochemical feedstocks, chemicals, refined petroleum products, agricultural chemicals and black oil along the Mississippi River System above Baton Rouge. The River fleet operates unit tows, where a towboat and generally a dedicated group of barges operate on consecutive voyages between loading and discharge points. Petrochemical feedstocks and processed chemicals are transported to waterfront petrochemical and chemical plants, while black oil, refined petroleum products and agricultural chemicals are transported to waterfront terminals.


The inland transportation of petrochemical feedstocks, chemicals and pressurized products is generally consistent throughout the year. Transportation of refined petroleum products, certain black oil and agricultural chemicals is generally more seasonal. Movements of black oil, such as asphalt, generally increase in the spring through fall months. Movements of refined petroleum products, such as gasoline blends, generally increase during the summer driving season, while heating oil movements generally increase during the winter months. Movements of agricultural chemicals generally increase during the spring and fall planting seasons.


The marine transportation inland operation moves and handles a broad range of sophisticated cargoes. To meet the specific requirements of the cargoes transported, the inland tank barges may be equipped with self-contained heating systems, high-capacity pumps, pressurized tanks, refrigeration units, stainless steel tanks, aluminum tanks or specialty coated tanks. Of the 8761,053 inland tank barges currently operated, 687828 are petrochemical and refined petroleum products barges, 120145 are black oil barges, 5470 are pressure barges and 10 are refrigerated anhydrous ammonia barges and five are specialty barges. Of the 8761,053 inland tank barges, 8421,029 are owned by the Company and 3424 are leased.


The fleet of 230299 inland towboats ranges from 800 to 52006,100 horsepower. Of the 230299 inland towboats, 161224 are owned by the Company and 6975 are chartered. Towboats in the 800 to 21002,100 horsepower classes provide power for barges used by the Canal and Linehaul fleets on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the Houston Ship Channel. Towboats in the 14001,400 to 32003,200 horsepower classes provide power for both the River and Linehaul fleets on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the Mississippi River System. Towboats above 36003,600 horsepower are typically used on the Mississippi River System to move River fleet unit tows and provide Linehaul fleet towing. Based on the capabilities of the individual towboats used in the Mississippi River System, the tows range in size from 10,000 to 30,000 tons.


12



Marine transportation services for inland movements are conducted under long-termterm or spot contracts typically ranging from one to five years, some of which have renewal options, with customers with whom the Company has traditionally had long-standing relationships, as well as under spot contracts.relationships. Typically, term contracts range from one to three years, some of which have renewal options. During the first nine months of 2016 and all of 2015 and 2014, approximately 80% of the inland marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 20% were spot contract revenues.  During the 2016 fourth quarter,2017, approximately 75% of inland marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 25% were spot contract revenues. During 2018 and 2019, approximately 65% of inland marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 35% were spot contract revenues.


All of the Company’s inland tank barges used in the transportation of bulk liquid products are of double hull construction and where applicable, are capable of controlling vapor emissions during loading and discharging operations in compliance with occupational healthsafety and safetyhealth regulations and air quality regulations.
12


The Company is one of the few inland tank barge operators with the ability to offer to its customers’customers distribution capabilities throughout the Mississippi River System and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Such distribution capabilities offer economies of scale resulting from the ability to match tank barges, towboats, products and destinations more efficiently.efficiently to meet its customers’ requirements.


Through the Company’s proprietary vessel management computer system, the fleet of barges and towboats is dispatched from a centralized dispatch at the corporate office. The towboats are equipped with satellite positioning and communication systems that automatically transmit the location of the towboat to the Company’s customer service department located in its corporate office. Electronic orders are communicated to the vessel personnel with reports of towing activities communicated electronically back to the customer service department. The electronic interface between the customer service department and the vessel personnel enables more effective matching of customer needs to barge capabilities, thereby maximizing utilization of the tank barge and towboat fleet. The Company’s customers are able to access information concerning the movement of their cargoes, including barge locations, through the Company’s web site.website.


Kirby Inland Marine operates the largest commercial tank barge fleeting service (temporary barge storage facilities) in numerous ports, including Houston, Corpus Christi, Freeport and Freeport,Orange, Texas, Baton Rouge, Covington, Lake Charles and New Orleans, Louisiana, Mobile, Alabama and other locations on the Mississippi River.Greenville, Mississippi. Included in the fleeting service is a shifting operation and fleeting service for dry cargo barges and tank barges on the Houston Ship Channel.Channel and in Freeport, Texas. Kirby Inland Marine provides service for its own barges, as well as outside customers, transferring barges within the areas noted, as well as fleeting barges.


Kirby Inland Marine also provides shore-based barge tankermantankermen to the Company and third parties. Services to the Company and third parties cover the Gulf Coast, mid-Mississippi Valley, and the Ohio River Valley.


San Jac Marine, LLC (“San Jac”), a subsidiary of Kirby Inland Marine, owns and operates a shipyard in Channelview, Texas used to build marine vessels for both inland and coastal applications, and provide maintenance and repair services. Kirby Inland Marine is also building inland towboats and performing routine maintenance and repairs at the shipyard.

The Company owns a two-thirds interest in Osprey, which transports project cargoes and cargo containers by barge on the United States inland waterway system.


Coastal Operations. The segment’s coastal operations are conducted through wholly owned subsidiaries, Kirby Offshore Marine, LLC (“Kirby Offshore Marine”) and Kirby Ocean Transport Company (“Kirby Ocean Transport”).


Kirby Offshore Marine provides marine transportation of refined petroleum products, petrochemicals and black oil in coastal regions of the United States. The coastal operations consist of the Atlantic and Pacific Divisions.


13



The Atlantic Division primarily operates along the eastern seaboard of the United States and along the Gulf Coast. The Atlantic Division vessels call on various coastal statesports from Maine to Texas, servicing refineries, storage terminals and power plants. The Atlantic Division also operates equipment, to a lesser extent, in the Eastern Canadian provinces. The tank barges and tugboats operating in the Atlantic Division are among the largest, with tank barges in the 10,000 to 194,000 barrel capacity range and coastal tugboats in the 18002,400 to 1000010,000 horsepower range, transporting primarily refined petroleum products, petrochemicals and black oil.


The Pacific Division primarily operates along the Pacific Coast of the United States, servicing refineries and storage terminals from Southern California to Washington State, throughout Alaska, including Dutch Harbor, Cook Inlet and the Alaska River Systems, and from California to Hawaii. The Pacific Division’s fleet consists of tank barges in the 26,00052,000 to 194,000 barrel capacity range and tugboats in the 20001,000 to 1100011,000 horsepower range, transporting primarily refined petroleum products.


The Pacific Division also services local petroleum retailers and oil companies distributing refined petroleum products and black oil between the Hawaiian Islands and provides other services to the local maritime community. The Hawaii fleet consists of tank barges in the 53,000 to 86,000 barrel capacity range and tugboats in the 10001,000 to 50005,000 horsepower range, transporting refined petroleum products for local and regional customers, black oil to power generation customers and delivering bunker fuel to ships. The Hawaii fleet also provides service docking, standby tug assistance and line handling to vessels using the Single Point Mooringsingle point mooring installation at Barbers Point, Oahu, Hawaii, a facility for large tankers to safely load and discharge their cargos through an offshore buoy and submerged pipeline without entering the port.
13


The coastal transportation of refined petroleum products and black oil is impacted by seasonality, partially dependent on the area of operations. Operations along the West Coast of the United States and in Alaska have been subject to more seasonal variations in demand than the operations along the East Coast and Gulf Coast regions.regions of the United States. Seasonality generally does not impact the Hawaiian market. Movements of refined petroleum products such as various blends of gasoline are strongest during the summer driving season while heating oil generally increases during the winter months.


The coastal fleet consists of 6949 tank barges with 6.24.7 million barrels of capacity, primarily transporting refined petroleum products, black oil and petrochemicals. The Company owns 47 of the coastal tank barges and two are leased. Of the 6949 coastal tank barges currently operating, 4833 are refined petroleum products and petrochemical barges and 2116 are black oil barges. The Company owns 62 of the coastal tank barges and seven are leased. The Company operates 7547 coastal tugboats ranging from 10001,000 to 1100011,000 horsepower, of which 6742 are owned by the Company and eightfive are chartered.


Coastal marine transportation services are conducted under long-term contracts, primarily one year or longer, some of which have renewal options, for customers with which the Company has traditionally had long-standing relationships, as well as under spot contracts. During 20162017, 2018 and the 2015 third and fourth quarters,2019, approximately 80% of the coastal marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 20% were spot contract revenues compared with approximately 85% under term contracts and 15% under spot contract during 2014 and the 2015 first and second quarters.revenues.


Kirby Offshore Marine also operates a fleet of threetwo offshore dry-bulk barge and tugboat units involved in the transportation of sugar and other dry products between Florida and East Coast ports. These vessels primarily operate under long-term contracts of affreightment that are typically one year or less in length.affreightment.


Kirby Ocean Transport owns and operates a fleet of threetwo offshore dry-bulk barges, threetwo offshore tugboats and one docking tugboat. Kirby Ocean Transport operates primarily under term contracts of affreightment, including a contract that expires in 2020 with Duke Energy Florida (“DEF”) to transport coal across the Gulf of Mexico to DEF’s power generation facility at Crystal River, Florida.


Kirby Ocean Transport is also engaged in the transportation of coal, fertilizer, sugar and other bulk cargoes on a short-term basis between domestic ports and occasionally the transportation of grain from domestic ports to ports primarily in the Caribbean Basin.


14



Contracts and Customers


Marine transportation inland and coastal services are conducted under term or spot contracts typically ranging from one to five years, some of which have renewal options, for customers with whom the Company has traditionally had long-standing relationships, as well as under spot contracts.relationships. Typically, term contracts range from one to three years, some of which have renewal options. The majority of the marine transportation contracts with its customers are for terms of one year. Most have been customers of the Company’s marine transportation segment for many years and management anticipates continued relationships; however, there is no assurance that any individual contract will be renewed.


A term contract is an agreement with a specific customer to transport cargo from a designated origin to a designated destination at a set rate (affreightment) or at a daily rate (time charter). The rate may or may not escalate during the term of the contract; however, the base rate generally remains constant and contracts often include escalation provisions to recover changes in specific costs such as fuel. Time charters, which insulate the Company from revenue fluctuations caused by weather and navigational delays and temporary market declines, represented approximately 52%62% of the marine transportation’s inland revenues under term contracts during 2016, 55%2019, 59% of revenue under term contracts during 20152018 and 56%49% of the revenue under term contracts during 2014.2017. A spot contract is an agreement with a customer to move cargo from a specific origin to a designated destination for a rate negotiated at the time the cargo movement takes place. Spot contract rates are at the current “market” rate and are subject to market volatility. The Company typically maintains a higher mix of term contracts to spot contracts to provide the Company with a more predictable revenue stream while maintaining spot market exposure to take advantage of new business opportunities and existing customers’ peak demands. During the first nine months of 2016 and all of 2015 and 2014, approximately 80% of the inland marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 20% were spot contract revenues.  During the 2016 fourth quarter,2017, approximately 75% of inland marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 25% were spot contract revenues. During 2018 and 2019, approximately 65% of inland marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 35% were spot contract revenues. Coastal time charters represented approximately 85% of the marine transportation coastal revenues under term contracts in 2016 as compared to 90% in  20152019, 2018 and 2014.2017.
14


No single customer of the marine transportation segment accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s revenues in 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014.2017.


Employees


The Company’s marine transportation segment has approximately 3,1003,350 employees, of which approximately 2,4002,650 are vessel crew members. None of the segment’s inland operations are subject to collective bargaining agreements. The segment’s coastal operation includesoperations include approximately 925675 vessel employees some of which are subject to collective bargaining agreements in certain geographic areas. Approximately 370250 Kirby Offshore Marine vessel crew members employed in the Atlantic Division are subject to a collective bargaining agreement with the Richmond Terrace Bargaining Unit that expired on Decemberin effect through August 31, 2016. This collective bargaining agreement was extended to  January 31, 2017 and is currently subject to ongoing negotiations.2022. In addition, approximately 175150 vessel crew members of Penn Maritime Inc. vessel crew members, a wholly owned subsidiary of Kirby Offshore Marine, are represented by the Seafarers International Union under a collective bargaining agreement in effect through April 2018.30, 2022.


Properties


The principal officeoffices of Kirby Inland Marine, Kirby Offshore Marine, Kirby Ocean Transport and Osprey isare located in Houston, Texas, in the Company’sthree facilities under a leaseleases that expiresexpire in July 2021, December 2025.2025 and December 2027. Kirby Inland Marine’s operating locations are on the Mississippi River at Baton Rouge and New Orleans, Louisiana, and Greenville, Mississippi, twothree locations in Houston, Texas, on andor near the Houston Ship Channel, one in Mobile, Alabama, one in Miami, Florida, andone in Covington, Louisiana, one in Lake Charles, Louisiana, one in Corpus Christi, Texas, and one in Orange, Texas. The New Orleans, Houston and HoustonOrange facilities are owned by the Company, and the Baton Rouge, Corpus Christi, Covington, Lake Charles, Greenville, Miami and Corpus ChristiMobile facilities are leased. Kirby Offshore Marine’s operating facilities are located in Staten Island, New York, Seattle, Washington and Honolulu, Hawaii. All of Kirby Offshore Marine’s operating facilities are leased, including pierpiers and wharf facilities and office and warehouse space. San Jac’s operating location is near the Houston Ship Channel.


15



Governmental Regulations


General. The Company’s marine transportation operations are subject to regulation by the USCG, federal laws, state laws and certain international conventions. The agencies establish safety requirements and standards and are authorized to investigate incidents.


Most of the Company’s tank barges are inspected by the USCG and carry certificates of inspection. The Company’s inland and coastal towing vessels and coastal dry-bulk barges are not currentlyalso subject to USCG regulations. The USCG has enacted safety regulations governing the inspection, requirements; however, federalstandards, and safety management systems of towing vessels. The regulations have been finalized that lay outalso create many new compliance options as well as new equipment, construction and operational requirements for design, construction, equipment, and operation of towing vessels subjecting inlandvessels. The USCG regulations supersede the jurisdiction of the United States Occupational Safety and coastalHealth Administration (“OSHA”) and any state regulations on vessel design, construction, alteration, repair, maintenance, operation, equipping, personnel qualifications and manning. The regulations requiring towing vessels to USCGobtain a certificate of inspection requirements.  These regulations became effective for existing towing vessels on July 20, 2016 and provide for2018. Other portions of the phase-in of certain requirements over time.  Existing towing vessels have untilregulations are phased in following the July 20, 2018 to meet most of the requirements of the regulations, with additional timing for other portions of the regulations. effective date through July 19, 2022.

Most of the Company’s coastal tugboats and coastal tank and dry-bulk barges are built to American Bureau of Shipping (“ABS”) classification standards and are inspected periodically by ABS to maintain the vessels in class. The crews employed by the Company aboard inland and coastal vessels, including captains, pilots, engineers, tankermen and ordinary seamen, are licensed by the USCG.
15


The Company is required by various governmental agencies to obtain licenses, certificates and permits for its vessels depending upon such factors as the cargo transported, the waters in which the vessels operate and other factors. The Company is of the opinion that the Company’s vessels have obtained and can maintain all required licenses, certificates and permits required by such governmental agencies for the foreseeable future. The Company’s failure to maintain these authorizations could adversely impact its operations.


The Company believes that additional security and environmental related regulations could be imposed on the marine industry in the form of contingency planning requirements. Generally, the Company endorses the anticipated additional regulations and believes it is currently operating to standards at least equal to anticipated additional regulations.


Jones Act. The Jones Act is a federal cabotage law that restricts domestic marine transportation in the United States to vessels built and registered in the United States and manned, by United States citizens, and owned and operated by United States citizens. For a corporation to qualify as United States citizens for the purpose of domestic trade, it is to be 75% owned and controlled by United States citizens.citizens within the meaning of the Jones Act. The Company monitors citizenship and meets the requirements of the Jones Act for its owned and operated vessels.


Compliance with United States ownership requirements of the Jones Act is important to the operations of the Company, and a violation of the loss of Jones Act status could have a material negative effect on the Company.Company and its vessels’ ability to operate. The Company monitors the citizenship of its employees and stockholders.stockholders and complies with United States build requirements.


User Taxes. Federal legislation requires that inland marine transportation companies pay a user tax based on propulsion fuel used by vessels engaged in trade along the inland waterways that are maintained by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. Such user taxes are designed to help defray the costs associated with replacing major components of the inland waterway system, such as locks and dams. A significant portion of the inland waterways on which the Company’s vessels operate is maintained by the Army Corps of Engineers.


The Company presently pays a federal fuel user tax of 29.1 cents per gallon consisting of a .10.1 cent per gallon leaking underground storage tank tax and 29 cents per gallon waterways user tax. The waterways user tax rate increased from 20 to 29 cents per gallon of fuel effective April 1, 2015.


Security Requirements. The Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 requires, among other things, submission to and approval by the USCG of vessel and waterfront facility security plans (“VSP” and “FSP”, respectively). The Company’sCompany maintains approved VSP and FSP have been approved and the Company is operating in compliance with the plans for all of its vessels and facilities that are subject to the requirements.


16



Environmental Regulations


The Company’s operations are affected by various regulations and legislation enacted for protection of the environment by the United States government, as well as many coastal and inland waterway states and international jurisdictions to the extent that the Company’s vessels transit in international waters. Government regulations require the Company to obtain permits, licenses and certificates for the operation of its vessels. Failure to maintain necessary permits or approvals could require the Company to incur costs or temporarily suspend operation of one or more of its vessels. Violations of these laws may result in civil and criminal penalties, fines, or other sanctions.


Water Pollution Regulations. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977 (“Clean Water Act”), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1981 (“CERCLA”) and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”) impose strict prohibitions against the discharge of oil and its derivatives or hazardous substances into the navigable waters of the United States. These acts impose civil and criminal penalties for any prohibited discharges and impose substantial strict liability for cleanup of these discharges and any associated damages. Certain states also have water pollution laws that prohibit discharges into waters that traverse the state or adjoin the state, and impose civil and criminal penalties and liabilities similar in nature to those imposed under federal laws.


The OPA and various state laws of similar intent substantially increased over historic levels the statutory liability of owners and operators of vessels for oil spills, both in terms of limit of liability and scope of damages.
16


One of the most important requirements under the OPA was that all newly constructed tank barges engaged in the transportation of oil and petroleum in the United States be double hulled, and all existing single hull tank barges be either retrofitted with double hulls or phased out of domestic service by December 31, 2014.


The Company manages its exposure to losses from potential discharges of pollutants through the use of well-maintained and equipped vessels, through safety, training and environmental programs, and through the Company’s insurance program. There can be no assurance, however, that any new regulations or requirements or any discharge of pollutants by the Company will not have an adverse effect on the Company.

Clean Water Act. The Clean Water Act establishes the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permitting program which regulates discharges into navigable waters of the United States. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulates the discharge of ballast water and other substances in United States waters under the Clean Water Act. EffectivePursuant to the NPDES program, effective February 6, 2009, the EPA issued regulations requiredrequiring vessels 79 feet in length or longer to comply with a Vessel General Permit authorizing ballast water discharges and other discharges incidental to the operation of the vessels. The EPA regulations also imposed technology and water quality based effluent limits for certain types of discharges and established specific inspection, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for vessels to ensure effluent limitations are met. The Vessel Incidental Discharge Act (“VIDA”), signed into law on December 4, 2018, established a new framework for the regulation of vessel incidental discharges under the Clean Water Act. VIDA requires the EPA to develop performance standards for those discharges within two years of enactment and requires the USCG to develop implementation, compliance, and enforcement regulations within two years of the EPA’s promulgation of standards. Under VIDA, all provisions of the Vessel General Permit iswhich became effective from December 19, 2013, to December 18, 2018.  Theremain in force and effect until the USCG regulations are finalized. The Company maintains Vessel General Permits and has established recordkeeping and reporting procedures in compliance with these obligations.

The USCG adopted regulations on ballast water management treatment systems establishing a standard for the allowable concentration of living organisms in certain vessel ballast water discharged in waters of the United States under the National Invasive Species Act. The regulations include requirements for the installation of engineering equipment to treat ballast water by establishing an approval process for ballast water management systems (“BWMS”). The BWMS implementation was suspended until December 2016 at which time the USCG approved manufacturer’smanufacturers’ systems that met the regulatory discharge standard equivalent to the International Maritime Organization'sOrganization’s D-2 standard. The phase-in schedule for those existing vessels requiring a system to install ballast water treatment management systemsa BWMS is dependent on vessel build date, ballast water capacity, and drydock schedule. Compliance with the ballast water treatment regulations requires the installation of equipment on some of the Company’s vessels to treat ballast water before it is discharged. The installation of BWMS equipment will require significant capital expenditures at the next scheduled drydocking for statutory purposes of existing vessels in order to complete the installation of the approved system.system on those existing vessels that require a system in order to comply with the BWMS regulations.

17



Financial Responsibility Requirement. Commencing with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended, vessels over 300 gross tons operating in the Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States have been required to maintain evidence of financial ability to satisfy statutory liabilities for oil and hazardous substance water pollution. This evidence is in the form of a Certificate of Financial Responsibility (“COFR”) issued by the USCG. The majority of the Company’s tank barges are subject to this COFR requirement, and the Company has fully complied with this requirement since its inception. The Company does not foresee any current or future difficulty in maintaining the COFR certificates under current rules.


Clean Air Regulations. The Federal Clean Air Act of 1979 (“CAA”) requires states to draft State Implementation Plans (“SIPs”) under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards designed to reduce atmospheric pollution to levels mandated by this act. Several SIPs provide for the regulation of barge loading and discharging emissions.emissions at waterfront facilities. The implementation of these regulations requires a reduction of hydrocarbon emissions released into the atmosphere during the loading of most petroleum products and the degassing and cleaning of barges for maintenance or change of cargo. These regulations require vessel operators whothat operate in these states with areas of nonattainment of air quality standards under the CAA to install vapor control equipment on their barges. The Company expects that future emission regulations will be developed and will apply this same technology to many chemicals that are handled by barge. Most of the Company’s barges engaged in the transportation of petrochemicals, chemicals and refined petroleum products are already equipped with vapor control systems. Although a risk exists that new regulations could require significant capital expenditures by the Company and otherwise increase the Company’s costs, the Company believes that, based upon the regulations that have been proposed thus far, no material capital expenditures beyond those currently contemplated by the Company and no material increase in costs are likely to be required.


Contingency Plan Requirement. The OPA and several state statutes of similar intent require the majority of the vessels and terminals operated by the Company to maintain approved oil spill contingency plans as a condition of operation. The Company has approved plans that comply with these requirements. The OPA also requires development of regulations for hazardous substance spill contingency plans. The USCG has not yet promulgated these regulations; however, the Company anticipates that they will not be more difficult to comply with than the oil spill plans.


Occupational Health Regulations. The Company’s inspected vessel operations are primarily regulated by the USCG for occupational health standards. Uninspected vessel operations and the Company’s shore personnel are subject to the United States Occupational Safety and Health AdministrationOSHA regulations. The Company believes that it is in compliance with the provisions of the regulations that have been adopted and does not believe that the adoption of any further regulations will impose additional material requirements on the Company. There can be no assurance, however, that claims will not be made against the Company for work related illness or injury, or that the further adoption of health regulations will not adversely affect the Company.


Insurance. The Company’s marine transportation operations are subject to the hazards associated with operating vessels carrying large volumes of bulk cargo in a marine environment. These hazards include the risk of loss of or damage to the Company’s vessels, damage to third parties as a result of collision, fire or explosion, adverse weather conditions, loss or contamination of cargo, personal injury of employees and third parties, and pollution and other environmental damages. The Company maintains hull, liability, general liability, workers compensation and pollution liability insurance coverage against these hazards. Risk of loss of or damage toFor shipyard operations, the Company’s vessels is insured through hull insurance currently insuring approximately $3.5 billion in hull values. Liabilities such as collision, cargo, environmental, personal injuryCompany has ship repairer’s liability and general liability are insured up to $1.3 billion per occurrence.builder’s risk insurance. The Company also maintains insurance coveragein the commercial insurance market to address commercial liabilities arising in connection with its diesel enginedistribution and services segment.

17
18



Environmental Protection. The Company has a number of programs that were implemented to further its commitment to environmental responsibility in its operations. In addition to internal environmental audits, one such program is environmental audits of barge cleaning vendors principally directed at management of cargo residues and barge cleaning wastes. Another is the participation by the Company in the American Waterways Operators Responsible Carrier program which is oriented towards continuously reducing the barge industry’s impact on the environment, including the distribution services area.

Safety. The Company manages its exposure to the hazards associated with its business through safety, training and preventive maintenance efforts. The Company places considerable emphasis onemphasizes its safety commitment through a program oriented toward extensive monitoring of safety performance for the purpose of identifying trends and initiating corrective action, and for the purpose of rewarding personnel achieving superiorcontinuously improving employee safety behavior and performance.


Training. The Company believes that among the major elements of a successful and productive work force are effective training programs. The Company also believes that training in the proper performance of a job enhances both the safety and quality of the service provided. New technology, regulatory compliance, personnel safety, quality and environmental concerns create additional demands for training. The Company has developed and instituted effective training programs.


Centralized training is provided through the Operations Personnel and Training Department, which is charged with developing, conducting and maintaining training programs for the benefit of all of the Company’s operating entities. It is also responsible for ensuring that training programs are both consistent and effective. The Company’s training facility includes state-of-the-art equipment and instruction aids, including a full bridge wheelhouse simulator, a working towboat, two tank barges and a tank barge simulator for tankermen training. During 2016,2019, approximately 1,3501,800 certificates were issued for the completion of courses at the training facility, of which 800approximately 675 were USCG approved classes and the balance werewas employee development and Company required classes, including Leadershipleadership, communication and Defensive Driving.navigation courses. The Company uses the Seaman’s Church Institute as an additional training resource for its wheelhouse crewmembers.


Quality. Kirby Inland Marine has made a substantial commitment to the implementation, maintenance and improvement of Quality Assurance Systems in compliance with the International Quality Standard, ISO 9001. Kirby Offshore Marine is certified under ABS ISM standards. These Quality Assurance Systems and certification have enabled both shore and vessel personnel to effectively manage the changes which occur in the working environment, as well as enhancing the Company’s safety and environmental performance.


DIESEL ENGINEDISTRIBUTION AND SERVICES


The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Kirby Distribution & Services, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries Kirby Engine Systems Inc.LLC, (“Kirby Engine Systems”), Stewart & Stevenson LLC (“S&S”) and itsUnited Holdings LLC (“United”), and through Kirby Engine Systems’ wholly owned subsidiaries Marine Systems, Inc. (“Marine Systems”), and Engine Systems, Inc. (“Engine Systems”), serves two markets, oil and United Holdings LLC (“United”),gas, and commercial and industrial. The Company sells genuine replacement parts, provides service mechanics to overhaul and repair medium-speed and high-speed diesel engines, transmissions, reduction gears and pumps,related oilfield service equipment, rebuilds component parts or entire diesel engines, transmissions and reduction gears, and related equipment used in oilfield services, marine, power generation, on-highway, and other commercial and industrial applications. The Company manufactures and remanufactures oilfield service equipment, including pressure pumping units. The Company primarily services the marine, power generation and the land-basedunits, for North American as well international oilfield service companies, and oil and gas operator and producer markets. The Company also sells engines, transmissions, power generation systems, and rents equipment including generators, industrial compressors, railcar movers, and high capacity lift trucks for use in a variety of commercial and industrial markets.


For the marineoil and gas market, the Company sells Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM)(“OEM”) replacement parts, sells and services diesel engines, pumps and transmissions, manufactures and remanufactures pressure pumping units, and manufactures cementing and pumping equipment, coil tubing and well intervention equipment, and gas compression equipment. Customers include oilfield service companies, and oil and gas operators and producers.

19



For the commercial and industrial market, the Company sells OEM replacement parts and new diesel engines, provides service mechanics and maintains facilities to overhaul and repair diesel engines and reduction gears,ancillary products for marine and maintains facilities to rebuild component parts or entire engineson-highway transportation companies, and reduction gears. For the power generation market, theindustrial companies. The Company provides engineering and field services, OEM replacement parts and safety-related products to power generation operators and to the nuclear industry, and manufactures engine generator and pump packages for the power generation operators and municipalities.
18

For the land-based market, the Company sells OEM replacement parts, sellsmunicipalities, offers power generation systems customized for specific commercial and services high-speed diesel engines, pumpsindustrial applications, and transmissions and manufactures and remanufactures oilfield servicerents equipment including pressure pumping units,generators, industrial compressors, railcar movers, and high capacity lift trucks for oilfield service companies and oil and gas operators and producers.use in a variety of industrial markets.


No single customer of the diesel enginedistribution and services segment accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s revenues in 2016, 20152019, 2018 or 2014.2017. The diesel enginedistribution and services segment also provides service to the Company’s marine transportation segment, which accounted for approximately 8%2% of the diesel enginedistribution and services segment’s 2016 revenues, 5% of 2015 revenues2019, 2018, and 3% of 20142017 revenues. Such revenues are eliminated in consolidation and not included in the table below.


The following table sets forth the revenues for the diesel enginedistribution and services segment for the three years ended December 31, 20162019 (dollars in thousands):


  2016  2015  2014 
  Amounts  %  Amounts  %  Amounts  % 
Manufacturing $3,177   1% $94,812   20% $261,553   33%
Overhauls and service  181,035   61   251,447   52   366,477   46 
Direct parts sales  114,568   38   138,183   28   167,604   21 
  $298,780   100% $484,442   100% $795,634   100%
  2019  2018  2017 
  Amounts  %  Amounts  %  Amounts  % 
Service and parts $939,246   75% $1,059,270   71% $687,848   77%
Manufacturing  312,071   25   428,284   29   202,464   23 
  $1,251,317   100% $1,487,554   100% $890,312   100%


MarineOil and Gas Operations


The Company is engaged in the distribution and service of high-speed diesel engines, pumps and transmissions, and the manufacture and remanufacture of oilfield service equipment. The oil and gas operations represented approximately 53% of the segment’s 2019 revenues. The Company offers custom fabricated oilfield service equipment, fully tested and field ready. The Company manufactures and remanufactures oilfield service equipment, including pressure pumping units, nitrogen pumping units, cementers, hydration equipment, mud pumps and blenders, coil tubing, well intervention equipment and gas compression equipment. The Company sells OEM replacement parts, and sells and services diesel engines, pumps and transmissions, and offers in-house and in-field service capabilities. The Company is the largest off-highway distributor for Allison Transmission and a major distributor for MTU in North America.

The Company’s manufacturing and remanufacturing facilities and service facilities are based in Houston, Texas and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, key oil and gas producing regions.

Oil and Gas Customers

The Company’s major oil and gas customers include large and mid-cap oilfield service providers, oil and gas operators and producers. The Company has long standing relationships with most of its customers. Since the oil and gas business is linked to the oilfield services industry, and oil and gas operators and producers, there is no assurance that its present gross revenues can be maintained in the future. The results of the Company’s oil and gas distribution and services operations are largely tied to the industries it serves and, therefore, are influenced by the cycles of such industries.

Oil and Gas Competitive Conditions

The Company’s primary competitors are other oilfield equipment manufacturers and remanufacturers, and equipment service companies. While price is a major determinant in the competitive process, equipment availability, reputation, consistent quality, expeditious service, experienced personnel, access to parts inventories and market presence are also significant factors. A substantial portion of the Company’s business is obtained by competitive bids.

20



Commercial and Industrial Operations

The Company serves the marine, on-highway, power generation, and other commercial and industrial markets primarily in the United States. The commercial and industrial operations represented approximately 47% of the segment’s 2019 revenues.

The Company is engaged in the overhaul and repair of medium-speed and high-speed marine diesel engines and reduction gears, line boring, block welding services and related parts sales for customers in the marine industry, which represented 36% of the segment’s 2016 revenues.industry. Medium-speed diesel engines have an engine speed of 400 to 10001,000 revolutions per minute (“RPM”) with a horsepower range of 800 to 32000.32,000. High-speed diesel engines have an engine speed of over 10001,000 RPM and a horsepower range of 50 to 8375.8,375. The Company services medium-speed and high-speed diesel engines utilized in the inland and offshore barge industries. It also services marine equipment and offshore drilling equipment used in the offshore petroleum exploration and oiloilfield service industry, marine equipment used in the offshore commercial fishing industry, andharbor docking vessels, commercial ferries, vessels owned by the United States government.government and large pleasure crafts.


The Company has marine operations throughout the United States providing in-house and in-field repair capabilities and related parts sales. The Company’s emphasis is on service to its customers, and it sends its crews from any of its locations to service customers’ equipment anywhere in the world. The medium-speed operations are located in Houma and Harvey, Louisiana, Houston, Texas, Chesapeake, Virginia, Paducah, Kentucky, Seattle, Washington and Tampa, Florida. The operations based in Chesapeake, Virginia and Tampa, Florida, areserving as the authorized distributors for 17 eastern statesdistributor for EMD Power Products (“EMD”). In October 2016, throughout the Company acquired the EMD business of Valley Power Systems, Inc. and Valley Power Systems Northwest, Inc. (collectively “VPS”) with the operations based in Seattle, Washington serving as the authorized EMD distributor for nine western states.  The marine operations based in Houma, Louisiana and Paducah, Kentucky are nonexclusive contracted service centers for EMD providing service and related parts sales.United States. The Company is also a distributor and representative for certain Alfa Laval products in the Midwest and on the East Coast, Gulf Coast, and West Coast. All of the marine locations are authorized distributors for Falk Corporation reduction gears and Oil States Industries, Inc. clutches. The Chesapeake, Virginia operation concentrates on East Coast inland and offshore dry-bulk, tank barge and harbor docking operators, and the United States government. The Houma and Harvey, Louisiana operation concentratesand Houston, Texas operations concentrate on the inland and offshore barge and oiloilfield services industries. The Tampa, Florida operation concentrates on Gulf of Mexico offshore dry-bulk, tank barge and harbor docking operators. The Paducah, Kentucky operation concentrates on the inland river towboat and barge operators and the Great Lakes carriers. The Seattle, Washington operation concentrates on the offshore commercial fishing industry, the offshore barge industry, the United States government, and other customers in Alaska, Hawaii and the Pacific Rim.


The high-speed marine operations are located in Houston, Texas, Houma, Baton Rouge, Belle Chasse and New Iberia, Louisiana, Paducah, Kentucky, Mobile, Alabama, Houston, TexasLodi and Thorofare, New Jersey.Jersey, and 10 locations in Florida. The Company serves as a factory-authorized marine dealer for Caterpillar diesel engines in Alabama, Kentucky, Louisiana, New Jersey and Texas.multiple states. The Company also operates factory-authorized full service marine distributorships/dealerships for Cummins, Detroit Diesel, and John Deere, MTU and Volvo Penta diesel engines, as well as Falk, Lufkin and Twin Disc marine gears. High-speed diesel engines provide the main propulsion for a significant amount of the United States flag commercial vessels and large pleasure craft vessels, other marine applications, including engines for power generators and barge pumps.

The Company distributes, sells parts for and services diesel engines and transmissions for on-highway use and provides in-house and in-field service capabilities. The Company is the largest on-highway distributor for Allison Transmission and Detroit Diesel/Daimler Truck North America, providing parts, service and warranty on engines, transmissions and related equipment in Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Louisiana, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Texas, Wyoming, and the country of Colombia. The Company also provides similar service for off-highway use and additionally has distributor rights for Deutz and Isuzu diesel engines. Off-highway applications are primarily surface and underground mining equipment, including loaders, crawlers, crushers, power screens, pumps, cranes, generators, haul trucks and personnel carriers, as well as equipment rental.

The Company is engaged in the overhaul and repair of diesel engines and generators, and related parts sales for power generation customers. The Company is also engaged in the sale and distribution of diesel engine parts, engine modifications, generator modifications, controls, governors and diesel generator packages to the nuclear industry. The Company services users of diesel engines that provide emergency standby, peak and base load power generation. The Company also sells power generation systems that are customized for specific applications and the rental of power generation systems.

19
21



The Company has power generation operations throughout the United States providing in-house and in-field repair capabilities and products for power generation applications. Through its Rocky Mount, North Carolina operation, the Company serves as the exclusive worldwide distributor of EMD products to the nuclear industry, the worldwide distributor for Woodward, Inc. products to the nuclear industry, the worldwide distributor of Baker Hughes Company (“Baker Hughes”) products to the nuclear industry, and owns the assets and technology necessary to support the Nordberg medium-speed diesel engines used in nuclear applications. In addition, the Rocky Mount operation is an exclusive distributor for Norlake Manufacturing Company transformer products to the nuclear industry, an exclusive distributor of Hannon Company generator and motor products to the nuclear industry, and a non-exclusive distributor of analog Weschler Instruments metering products and an exclusive distributor of digital Weschler metering products to the nuclear industry. The Company is a non-exclusive distributor of Ingersoll Rand air start equipment to the nuclear industry worldwide.

The Company sells pre-packaged and fabricated power generation systems for emergency, standby and auxiliary power for commercial and industrial applications. The Company also offers rental generator systems from MTU, Atlas Copco, and Multiquip from 50 to 2,000 kilowatts of power to a broad range of customers. The Company also is engaged in the rental of generators, industrial compressors, railcar movers and high capacity lift trucks. In addition, the Company provides accessory products such as cables, hoses, fuel cells, air dryers, air compressor boosters and ground heaters. Lastly, the Company is a dealer for Thermo King refrigeration systems for trucks, railroad cars and other land transportation markets in Texas and Colorado.

MarineCommercial and Industrial Customers


The Company’s major marine customers include inland and offshore barge operators, oiloilfield service companies, offshore fishing companies, other marine transportation entities, and the United States government.

government and large pleasure crafts. Since the marine business is linked to the relative health of the diesel powerinland towboat, offshore and coastal tugboat, and towboat industry, theharbor docking tugboat, offshore supply boat industry, theoilfield service, oil and gas drilling, industry, the militaryoffshore commercial fishing industries, Great Lakes ore vessels, dredging vessels, coastal ferries, United States government vessels and the offshore commercial fishingpleasure craft industry, there is no assurance that its present gross revenues can be maintained in the future. The results of the diesel enginedistribution and services industry are largely tied to the industries it serves and, therefore, are influenced by the cycles of such industries.


The Company’s on-highway customers are long-haul and short-haul trucking companies, commercial and industrial companies with truck fleets, buses owned by municipalities and private companies. Off-highway companies include surface and underground mining operations with a large variety of equipment.

The Company’s power generation customers are domestic utilities and the worldwide nuclear power industry, municipalities, universities, medical facilities, data centers, petrochemical plants, manufacturing facilities, shopping malls, office complexes, residential and other industrial users.

The Company’s rental customers are primarily commercial and industrial companies, and residential customers with short-term rental requirements.

MarineCommercial and Industrial Competitive Conditions


The Company’s primary marine competitors are independent diesel enginedistribution and services companies and other factory-authorized distributors, authorized service centers and authorized marine dealers. Certain operators of diesel powered marine equipment also elect to maintain in-house service capabilities. While price is a major determinant in the competitive process, reputation, consistent quality, expeditious service, experienced personnel, access to parts inventories and market presence are also significant factors. A substantial portion of the Company’s business is obtained by competitive bids. However, the Company has entered into service agreements with certain operators of diesel powered marine equipment, providing such operators with one source of support and service for all of their requirements at pre-negotiated prices.


22



The Company is one of a limited number of authorized resellers of EMD, Caterpillar, Cummins, Detroit Diesel, and John Deere, MTU and Volvo Penta parts. The Company is also the only marine distributor for Falk, Lufkin and Twin Disc reduction gears throughout the United States.

Power Generation Operations

The Company is engaged in the overhaul and repair of diesel engines and generators, and related parts sales for power generation customers, which represented 16% of the segment’s 2016 revenues. The Company is also engaged in the sale and distribution of diesel engine parts, engine modifications, generator modifications, controls, governors and diesel generator packages to the nuclear industry. The Company services users of diesel engines that provide emergency standby, peak and base load power generation.

The Company provides in-house and in-field repair capabilities and products to power generation operators from the Rocky Mount, North Carolina location. The operation based in Rocky Mount, North Carolina is an EMD authorized distributor for 17 eastern states for power generation applications, and provides in-house and in-field service. The Rocky Mount operation is also the exclusive worldwide distributor of EMD products to the nuclear industry, the worldwide distributor for Woodward, Inc. products to the nuclear industry, the worldwide distributor of GE Oil & Gas Compression Systems, LLC products to the nuclear industry, and owns the assets and technology necessary to support the Nordberg medium-speed diesel engines used in nuclear applications. In addition, the Rocky Mount operation is an exclusive distributor for Norlake Manufacturing Company transformer products to the nuclear industry, an exclusive distributor of Hannon Company generator and motor products to the nuclear industry, and a non-exclusive distributor of analog Weschler Instruments metering products and an exclusive distributor of digital Weschler metering products to the nuclear industry. The Company is a non-exclusive distributor of Ingersoll Rand air start equipment to the nuclear industry worldwide.
20

Power Generation Customers

The Company’s power generation customers are primarily domestic utilities and the worldwide nuclear power industry.

Power Generation Competitive Conditions


The Company’s primary power generation competitors are other independent diesel service companies and manufacturers. While price is a major determinant in the competitive process, reputation, consistent quality, expeditious service, experienced personnel, access to parts inventories and market presence are also significant factors. A substantial portion of the Company’s business is obtained by competitive bids.


As noted under Power Generation Operations above, the Company is the exclusive worldwide distributor of EMD, GE Oil & Gas,Baker Hughes, Woodward, Nordberg, Norlake and Hannon parts for the nuclear industry, and non-exclusive distributor of Weschler parts and Ingersoll Rand air start equipment for the nuclear industry. Specific regulations relating to equipment used in nuclear power generation require extensive testing and certification of replacement parts. OEM parts need to be properly tested and certified for nuclear applications.


Land-Based OperationsEmployees


The CompanyCompany’s distribution and services segment has approximately 2,200 employees. None of the United Holdings and Kirby Engine Systems operations are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Approximately 60 S&S employees in New Jersey are subject to a collective bargaining agreement with the Local 15C, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO that expires in October 2023. The remaining S&S employees are not subject to collective bargaining agreements.

Properties

The principal office of the distribution and services segment is engagedlocated in Houston, Texas. There are 63 active facilities in the distribution and serviceservices segment, of high-speed diesel engines, pumpswhich 27 facilities are owned and transmissions, and the manufacture and remanufacture of oilfield service equipment. The land-based operations represented 48% of the segment’s 2016 revenues. The Company offers a full line of custom fabricated oilfield service equipment, fully tested and field ready. The Company manufactures products or components that36 facilities are purchased by a company and marketed under the purchasing company’s brand name. The Company distributes, sells parts for and services diesel engines and transmissions for on-and off-highway use and provides in-house and in-field service capabilities. The Company is the largest off-highway distributor for Allison, a major distributor for MTU in North America, and a distributor for Isuzu diesel engines. The Company is also the distributor for parts, service and warranty on Daimler engines and related equipment in Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana. The Company manufactures and remanufactures oilfield service equipment, including pressure pumping units, nitrogen pumping units, cementers, hydration equipment, mud pumps and blenders. Lastly, the Company is a dealer for Thermo King refrigeration systems for trucks, railroad cars and other land transportation markets in south and central Texas.leased.


The Company’s land-based operation is based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma with 13 locations across four states in key oil and gas producing regions and major transportation corridors. The distribution and service facilities are located in Oklahoma City and Tulsa, Oklahoma, Little Rock, Arkansas, Shreveport, Louisiana, and Cotulla and Odessa, Texas. The Company’soperation’s principal manufacturing facility is located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The Company’s refrigeration facilities are located in Houston, Pharr, Laredo, San Antonio, Corpus ChristiTexas and Austin, Texas.

Land-Based Customers

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, with both facilities owned by the Company. The Company’s major land-based customers include large and mid-cap oilfield service providers, oil and gas operatorsfocused operations have 19 parts and producers, construction companies, domesticservice facilities, with one in Arkansas, two in Colorado, four in Louisiana, one in New Mexico, one in Oklahoma, nine in Texas and international utilities, on-highway transportation companies and companies associatedone in Wyoming, with many of these facilities shared with the agricultural markets. commercial and industrial operations.

The Company has long standing relationshipscommercial and industrial businesses operate 42 parts and service facilities, with most of its customers.one facility in Alabama, one in Connecticut, one in Colorado, 11 in Florida, one in Kentucky, two in Louisiana, one in Massachusetts, one in Oklahoma, three in New Jersey, one in New York, one in North Carolina, 11 in Texas, one in Virginia, one in Washington and five facilities located in Colombia, South America.

Since the land-based business is linked to the oilfield services industry and oil and gas operators and producers, there is no assurance that its present gross revenues can be maintained in the future. The results of the land-based diesel engine services industry are largely tied to the industries it serves and, therefore, are influenced by the cycles of such industries.

21
23

Land-Based Competitive Conditions

The Company’s primary competitors are other oilfield equipment manufacturers and service companies. While price is a major determinant in the competitive process, equipment availability, reputation, consistent quality, expeditious service, experienced personnel, access to parts inventories and market presence are also significant factors. A substantial portion of the Company’s business is obtained by competitive bids.

Employees

The Company’s diesel engine services segment has approximately 850 employees. None of the segment’s operations are subject to collective bargaining agreements.

Properties

The principal offices of the diesel engine services segment are located in Houma, Louisiana and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

The marine and power generation businesses operate 12 parts and service facilities, with facilities located in Houma, Baton Rouge, Belle Chasse and New Iberia, Louisiana, Mobile, Alabama, Houston, Texas, Chesapeake, Virginia, Rocky Mount, North Carolina, Paducah, Kentucky, Tampa, Florida, Seattle, Washington and Thorofare, New Jersey. All of these facilities are leased except the Houma, Belle Chasse and New Iberia, Louisiana, Houston, Texas and Mobile, Alabama facilities, which are owned by the Company.

The land-based business operates 13 distribution and service and manufacturing facilities across four states in key oil and gas producing regions and major transportation corridors. The distribution and service facilities are located in Oklahoma City and Tulsa, Oklahoma, Little Rock, Arkansas, Shreveport, Louisiana, and Cotulla and Odessa, Texas. The Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Shreveport, Louisiana and the Little Rock, Arkansas facilities are owned by the Company and the Tulsa, Oklahoma and Cotulla and Odessa, Texas facilities are leased. The Company’s manufacturing facility is located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and is owned by the Company. The Company’s refrigeration facilities are located in Houston, Pharr, Laredo, San Antonio, Corpus Christi and Austin, Texas. All of these facilities are leased except for the San Antonio facility which is owned by the Company.


Executive Officers of the Registrant


The executive officers of the Company are as follows:


Name Age Positions and Offices
Joseph H. Pyne69Chairman of the Board
David W. Grzebinski 5558 President and Chief Executive Officer
C. Andrew SmithWilliam G. Harvey 4662 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Christian G. O’Neil47President – Kirby Inland Marine, Kirby Offshore Marine, and San Jac Marine, LLC
Joseph H. Reniers 42Executive Vice President– Diesel Engine Services and Supply Chain
William G. Ivey7345 President – Marine Transportation Group, Kirby Inland Marine and Kirby Offshore MarineDistribution & Services, Inc.
Dorman L. Strahan 6063 President – Kirby Engine Systems
Christian G. O’Neil44Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer–Kirby Inland Marine and Kirby Offshore Marine
Kim B. Clarke 6164 Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
Ronald A. Dragg 5356 Vice President, Controller and Assistant Secretary
James F. FarleyEric S. Holcomb 6545 Vice President – IndustryInvestor Relations
Amy D. Husted 4851 Vice President, and General Counsel and Secretary
David R. MosleyScott P. Miller 5241 Vice President and Chief Information Officer
RenatoKurt A. CastroNiemietz 4547 Vice President and Treasurer
William M. Woodruff59Vice President – Public and Governmental Affairs
22


No family relationship exists among the executive officers or among the executive officers and the directors. Officers are elected to hold office until the annual meeting of directors, which immediately follows the annual meeting of stockholders, or until their respective successors are elected and have qualified.

Joseph H. Pyne holds a degree in liberal arts from the University of North Carolina and has served the Company as Chairman of the Board since April 2014. He served the Company as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer from January 2014 to April 2014, as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer from April 2013 to January 2014 and from April 2010 to April 2011, and as President and Chief Executive Officer from 1995 to April 2010, Executive Vice President from 1992 to 1995 and as President of Kirby Inland Marine from 1984 to November 1999. He has served the Company as a Director since 1988. He also served in various operating and administrative capacities with Kirby Inland Marine from 1978 to 1984, including Executive Vice President from January to June 1984. Prior to joining the Company, he was employed by Northrop Services, Inc. and served as an officer in the Navy.


David W. Grzebinski is a Chartered Financial Analyst and holds a Master of Business Administration degree from Tulane University and a degree in chemical engineering from the University of South Florida. He has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since April 2014. He served as President and Chief Operating Officer from January 2014 to April 2014 and as Chief Financial Officer from March 2010 to April 2014. He served as Chairman of Kirby Offshore Marine from February 2012 to April 2013 and served as Executive Vice President from March 2010 to January 2014. Prior to joining the Company in February 2010, he served in various administrativeoperational and financial positions since 1988 with FMC Technologies Inc. (“FMC”), including Controller, Energy Services, Treasurer, and Director of Global SAP and Industry Relations. Prior to joining FMC, he was employed by Dow Chemical Company.Company in manufacturing, engineering and financial roles.


C. Andrew SmithWilliam G. Harvey is a Certified Public AccountantChartered Financial Analyst and holds a Master of Business Administration degree in business administration from the University of Houston.Toronto and a degree in mechanical engineering from Queens University. He has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since April 2014.February 2018.  He served as Executive Vice President – Finance from January 20142018 to April 2014.February 2018. Prior to joining the Company, in January 2014, heMr. Harvey served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Walter Energy, Inc. from 2012 to 2017, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Benthic GeotechResolute Forest Products Inc. (“Resolute”) from 2008 to 2011, and was previously Chief Financial Officer for both Global Industries, LTD and NATCO Group.

Joseph H. Reniers holds a degree in mechanical engineering from the United States Naval Academy and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. He has served the Company as Executive Vice President – Diesel Engine Services and Supply Chain since May 2016.  He served as Senior Vice President – Diesel Engine Services and Marine Facility OperationsChief Financial Officer of Bowater Inc., a predecessor company of Resolute, from February 20152004 to May 2016, Vice President – Strategy and Operational Service from April 2014 to February 2015, Vice President – Supply Chain from April 2012 to April 2014 and Vice President – Human Resources from March 2010 to April 2012. Prior to joining the Company, he was a management consultant with McKinsey & Company serving a wide variety of industrial clients. Prior to joining McKinsey, he served as a nuclear power officer in the Navy.2008.

William G. Ivey attended the University of Houston and has served the Company as President –  Marine Transportation Group since February 2014, President of Kirby Offshore Marine since January 2016, President of Kirby Inland Marine since April 2011 and served as Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing from 1989 to April 2011. He joined the Company in 1989 with the acquisition of Alamo Inland Marine. Prior to joining the Company he served in various sales and marketing positions with inland marine companies dating back to 1970.

Dorman L. Strahan attended Nicholls State University and has served the Company as President of Kirby Engine Systems since May 1999, President of Marine Systems since 1986 and President of Engine Systems since 1996. After joining the Company in 1982 in connection with the acquisition of Marine Systems, he served as Vice President of Marine Systems until 1985.
23


Christian G. O’Neil holds a Master of Business Administration degree from Rice University, a doctorate of jurisprudence from Tulane University and a bachelor of arts degree from Southern Methodist University. He has served as President of Kirby Inland Marine and Kirby Offshore Marine since January 2018 and as President of San Jac Marine, LLC since October 2018. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Kirby Inland Marine and Kirby Offshore Marine sincefrom May 2016.2016 to January 2018. He also served as Executive Vice President – Commercial Operations of Kirby Inland Marine and Kirby Offshore Marine from April 2014 to May 2016, Vice President – Human Resources of the Company from May 2012 to April 2014, Vice President – Sales for Kirby Inland Marine from 2009 to 2012 and President of Osprey from 2006 through 2008. He has also served in various sales and business development roles at the Company and Osprey. Prior to joining the Company, he served as Sales Manager and Fleet Manager at Hollywood Marine, Inc. (“Hollywood Marine”) after joining Hollywood Marine in 1997.


24



Joseph H. Reniers holds a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and a degree in mechanical engineering from the United States Naval Academy. He has served the Company as President – Kirby Distribution & Services, Inc. since September 2017. He served as Executive Vice President – Diesel Engine Services and Supply Chain from May 2016 to September 2017, Senior Vice President – Diesel Engine Services and Marine Facility Operations from February 2015 to May 2016, Vice President – Strategy and Operational Service from April 2014 to February 2015, Vice President – Supply Chain from April 2012 to April 2014 and Vice President – Human Resources from March 2010 to April 2012. Prior to joining the Company, he was a management consultant with McKinsey & Company serving a wide variety of industrial clients. Prior to joining McKinsey, he served as a nuclear power officer in the Navy.

Dorman L. Strahan attended Nicholls State University and has served the Company as President of Kirby Engine Systems since May 1999, President of Marine Systems since 1986 and President of Engine Systems since 1996. After joining the Company in 1982 in connection with the acquisition of Marine Systems, he served as Vice President of Marine Systems until 1985.

Kim B. Clarke holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Houston. She has served as Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since October 2017. She served as Vice President – Human Resources sincefrom December 2016.2016 to October 2017. Prior to joining the Company, she served in senior leadership roles in human resources, safety, information technology and business development as Senior Vice President and Chief Administration Officer for Key Energy Services, Inc. from 2004 to March 2016.


Ronald A. Dragg is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Master of Science in Accountancy degree from the University of Houston and a degree in finance from Texas A&M University. He has served the Company as Vice President, Controller and ControllerAssistant Secretary since January 2007.April 2014. He also served as Vice President and Controller from January 2007 to April 2014, as Controller from November 2002 to January 2007, Controller – Financial Reporting from January 1999 to October 2002, and Assistant Controller – Financial Reporting from October 1996 to December 1998. Prior to joining the Company, he was employed by Baker Hughes Incorporated.


James F. FarleyEric S. Holcomb is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a MasterBachelor of ScienceBusiness Administration degree in accounting from Thunderbird School of Global Management and a bachelor of arts degree from Texas TechSouthern Methodist University. He has served the Company as Vice President – IndustryInvestor Relations since January 2016. He served as President of Kirby Offshore Marine from February 2012 to January 2016 and served as Executive Vice President – Operations of Kirby Inland Marine from 2003 to February 2012.December 2017. Prior to joining the Company, he was employed by Baker Hughes Incorporated from 2003 to December 2017 serving in 2003, he held senior level marketing, logisticsvarious roles including Investor Relations Director, Finance Director for North America Land, Finance Director for North America Offshore and operations positions in the marine transportation industry.Finance Director for Canada.


Amy D. Husted holds a doctorate of jurisprudence from South Texas College of Law and a Bachelor of Science degree in political science from the University of Houston. She has served the Company hasas Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since April 2019.  She also served as Vice President and General Counsel sincefrom January 2017.  She served as2017 to April 2019, Vice President – Legal from January 2008 to January 2017 and served as Corporate Counsel from November 1999 through December 2007. Prior to joining the Company, she served as Corporate Counsel of Hollywood Marine from 1996 to 1999 after joining Hollywood Marine in 1994.


David R. MosleyScott P. Miller holds a degreeBachelor of Science in computer scienceManagement of Information Systems from Texas A&MLouisiana State University and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Houston.  He has served the Company as Vice President and Chief Information Officer since May 2007. Prior to joining the Company in 2007, he served as Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Prudential Real Estate Services Company from 2005 to May 2007, Vice President – Service Delivery for Iconixx Corporation from 1999 to 2005, Vice President – Product Development and Services for ADP Dealer Services from 1995 to 1999 and in various information technology development and management positions from 1987 to 1995.

Renato A. Castro is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Master of Business Administration degree from Tulane University and a degree in civil engineering from the National Autonomous University of Honduras. He has served the Company as Treasurer since April 2010 and served as Manager of Financial Analysis from 2007 to April 2010. He also served as Financial Analyst from 2005 through 2006 and Assistant Controller of Kirby Inland Marine from 2001 through 2004.2019.  Prior to joining the Company, he was employed by Key Energy Services, Inc. from May 2006 to March 2019, serving in various senior leadership roles including Managing Director of Strategy, Vice President and Chief Information Officer from March 2013 to December 2015 and as Senior Vice President, Operations Services and Chief Administrative Officer from January 2016 to March 2019.

Kurt A. Niemietz holds a subsidiaryMaster of Astaldi S.p.A.Business Administration degree from St. Mary’s University and a degree in their transport infrastructure division.accounting from the University of Texas at San Antonio. He has served as Vice President and Treasurer since April 2019.  Prior to joining the Company, he was employed by Pacific Drilling from 2013 to 2019, serving in various roles of increasing responsibility, including Treasurer from 2017 to 2019, and in various financial positions with FMC, from 2006 to 2013. Prior to joining FMC, he was employed by Austin, Calvert & Flavin as a buy-side equity analyst.

24
25



William M. Woodruff holds a doctorate of jurisprudence from the University of Houston Law Center and a bachelor of science degree from Texas A&M University. He has served as Vice President – Public and Governmental Affairs since October 2017. He served as Director – Public & Government Affairs from 2014 to October 2017 after joining the Company as Director – Government Affairs in 2004. Prior to joining the Company, he was a maritime lawyer in private practice and Vice President and General Counsel of Coastal Towing, Inc.

Item 1A.Risk Factors


The following risk factors should be considered carefully when evaluating the Company, as its businesses, results of operations, or financial condition could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. The following discussion does not attempt to cover factors, such as trends in the United States and global economies or the level of interest rates, among others, that are likely to affect most businesses.


The Inland Waterway infrastructure is aging and may result in increased costs and disruptions to the Company’s marine transportation segment. Maintenance of the United States inland waterway system is vital to the Company’s operations. The system is composed of over 12,000 miles of commercially navigable waterway, supported by over 240 locks and dams designed to provide flood control, maintain pool levels of water in certain areas of the country and facilitate navigation on the inland river system. The United States inland waterway infrastructure is aging, with more than half of the locks over 50 years old. As a result, due to the age of the locks, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance outages may be more frequent in nature, resulting in delays and additional operating expenses. One-half of the cost of new construction and major rehabilitation of locks and dams is paid by marine transportation companies through a 29 cent per gallon diesel fuel tax and the remaining 50% is paid from general federal tax revenues. Failure of the federal government to adequately fund infrastructure maintenance and improvements in the future would have a negative impact on the Company’s ability to deliver products for its customers on a timely basis. In addition, any additional user taxes that may be imposed in the future to fund infrastructure improvements would increase the Company’s operating expenses.


The Company is subject to adverse weather conditions in its marine transportation and diesel enginedistribution and services segments. The Company’s marine transportation segment is subject to weather conditions on a daily basis.condition volatility. Adverse weather conditions such as high or low water on the inland waterway systems, fog and ice, tropical storms, hurricanes and tsunamis on both the inland waterway systems and throughout the United States coastal waters can impair the operating efficiencies of the marine fleet. Such adverse weather conditions can cause a delay, diversion or postponement of shipments of products and are totally beyond the control of the Company. In addition, adverse water and weather conditions can negatively affect a towing vessel’s performance, tow size, loading drafts, fleet efficiency, place limitations on night passageslimit navigation periods and dictate horsepower requirements. The Company’s diesel enginedistribution and services segment is subject to tropical storms and hurricanes impacting its coastal locations and tornadoes impacting its Oklahoma facilities.


The Company could be adversely impacted by a marine accident or spill event. A marine accident or spill event could close a portion of the inland waterway system or a coastal area of the United States for aan extended period of time. Although statistically marine transportation is the safest means of transportingsurface transportation of bulk commodities, accidents do occur, both involving Company equipment and equipment owned by other marine carriers.


The Company transports a wide variety of petrochemicals, black oil, refined petroleum products and agricultural chemicals throughout the Mississippi River System, on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, coastwise along all three United States coasts and in Alaska and Hawaii. The Company manages its exposure to losses from potential unauthorized discharges of pollutants through the use of well-maintained and equipped tank barges and towing vessels, through safety, training and environmental programs, and through the Company’s insurance program, but a discharge of pollutants by the Company could have an adverse effect on the Company.Risks may arise for which the Company may not be insured. Claims covered by insurance are subject to deductibles, the aggregate amount of which could be material, and certain policies impose limitations on coverage. Existing insurance coverage may not be able to renewed at commercially reasonable rates or coverage capacity for certain risks may not be available or adequate to cover future claims. If a loss occurs that is partially or completely uninsured, or the carrier is unable or unwilling to cover the claim, the Company could be exposed to liability.


26



The Company’s marine transportation segment is dependent on its ability to adequately crew its towing vessels. The Company’s towing vessels are crewed with employees who are licensed or certified by the USCG, including its captains, pilots, engineers and tankermen. The success of the Company’s marine transportation segment is dependent on the Company’s ability to adequately crew its towing vessels. As a result, the Company invests significant resources in training its crews and providing crew members an opportunity to advance from a deckhand to the captain of a Company towboat or tugboat. Lifestyle issues are a deterrent for employment for inland and coastal crew members. Inland crew members generally work a 20 days on, 10 days off rotation, or a 30 days on, 15 days off rotation. For the coastal fleet, crew members are generally required to work a 14 days on, 14 days off rotation, a 21 days on, 21 days off rotation or a 30 days on, 30 days off rotation, dependent upon the location. The nature of crewmember work schedules and assignments away from home for extended periods require special recruiting and at times it can be difficult to find candidates. With ongoing retirements and competitive labor pressure in the marine transportation segment, the Company continues to monitor and implement market competitive pay practices. The Company also utilizes an internal development program to train Maritime Academy graduates for vessel leadership positions.
25


The Company’s marine transportation segment has approximately 3,1003,350 employees, of which approximately 2,4002,650 are vessel crew members. None of the segment’s inland operations are subject to collective bargaining agreements. The segment’s coastal operation includesoperations include approximately 925675 vessel employees, of whom approximately 545400 are subject to collective bargaining agreements in certain geographic areas. Any work stoppages or labor disputes could adversely affect coastal operations in those areas.


ReductionThe Company may be unable to make attractive acquisitions or successfully integrate acquired businesses, and any inability to do so may adversely affect the Company’s business and hinder its ability to grow. The Company has made asset and business acquisitions in the numberpast and may continue to make acquisitions of acquisitions made byassets or businesses in the future that complement or expand the Company’s current business. The Company may curtail future growth. Since 1986, the Company has been successful in the integration of 32 acquisitions in its marine transportation segment and 18 acquisitions in its diesel engine services segment. Acquisitions have played a significant part in the growth of the Company. The Company’s marine transportation revenue in 1987 was $40.2 million compared with $1.47 billion in 2016. Diesel engine services revenue in 1987 was $7.1 million compared with $298.8 million in 2016. While the Company is of the opinion that futurenot be able to identify attractive acquisition opportunities. Even if attractive acquisition opportunities exist in both its marine transportation and diesel engine services segments,are identified, the Company may not be able to continuecomplete the acquisition or do so on commercially acceptable terms. The success of any completed acquisition depends on the Company’s ability to grow through acquisitionsintegrate the acquired assets or business effectively into the Company’s existing operations. The process of integrating acquired assets or businesses may involve difficulties that require a disproportionate amount of the Company’s managerial and financial resources to resolve. The value of acquired assets or businesses may be negatively impacted by a variety of circumstances unknown to the extentCompany prior to the acquisition. In addition, possible future acquisitions may be larger and for purchase prices significantly higher than those paid for earlier acquisitions. No assurance can be given that it has in the past.Company will be able to identify additional suitable acquisition opportunities, negotiate acceptable terms, obtain financing for acquisitions on acceptable terms or successfully acquire identified targets. The Company’s failure to achieve synergies, to integrate successfully the acquired businesses and assets into the Company’s existing operations, or to minimize any unforeseen operational difficulties could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, agreements governing the Company’s indebtedness from time to time may impose certain limitations on the Company’s ability to undertake acquisitions or make investments or may limit the Company’s ability to incur certain indebtedness and liens, which could limit the Company’s ability to make acquisitions.


The Company’s failure to comply with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), or similar local applicable anti-bribery laws, could have a negative impact on its ongoing operations. The Company’s operations outside the United States require the Company to comply with both a number of United States and international regulations. For example, in addition to any similar applicable local anti-bribery laws, its operations in countries outside the United States are subject to the FCPA, which prohibits United States companies or their agentsemployees and employeesthird party representatives from providing anything of value to a foreign official for the purposes of influencing any act or decision of these individuals in their official capacity to help obtain or retain business, direct business to any person or corporate entity, or obtain any unfair advantage. The Company has internal control policies and procedures and has implemented training and compliance programs for its employees and agentsthird party representatives with respect to the FCPA. However, the Company’s policies, procedures and programs may not always protect it from reckless or criminal acts committed by its employees or agents,third party representatives, and severe criminal or civil sanctions could be the result of violations of the FCPA.FCPA or any other applicable anti-bribery law in countries where the Company does business. The Company is also subject to the risks that its employees, joint venture partners, and agentsthird party representatives outside of the United States may fail to comply with other applicable laws.


The Company’s marine transportation segment is subject to the Jones Act. The Company’s marine transportation segment competes principally in markets subject to the Jones Act, a federal cabotage law that restricts domestic marine transportation in the United States to vessels built and registered in the United States, and manned, owned and ownedoperated by United States citizens. The Company presently meets all of the requirements of the Jones Act for its owned and operated vessels. The loss of Jones Act status could have a significant negative effect on the Company. The requirements that the Company’s vessels be United States built and manned by United States citizens, the crewing requirements and material requirements of the USCG, and the application of United States labor and tax laws increases the cost of United States flag vessels when compared with comparable foreign flag vessels. The Company’s business could be adversely affected if the Jones Act or international trade agreements or laws were to be modified or waived as to permit foreign competition that isflag vessels to operate in the United States as these vessels are not subject to the same United States government imposed burdens.regulations, laws, and restrictions. Since the events of September 11, 2001, the United States government has taken steps to increase security of United States ports, coastal waters and inland waterways. The Company believes that it is unlikely that the current cabotage provisions of the Jones Act would be eliminated or significantly modified or eliminatedin a way that has a material adverse impact on the Company in the foreseeable future.


27



The Secretary of Homeland Security is vested with the authority and discretion to waive the Jones Act to such extent and upon such terms as the Secretary may prescribe whenever the Secretary deems that such action is necessary in the interest of national defense. In response toOn September 8, 2017, following Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, the effectsDepartment of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the Secretary waived the Jones Act generally for the transportationHomeland Security issued a waiver of petroleum products from September 1 to September 19, 2005 and from September 26, 2005 to October 24, 2005. In June 2011, the Secretary waived the Jones Act for the transportation of petroleum releaseda 7-day period for shipments from the Strategic Petroleum ReserveNew York, Pennsylvania, Texas and in November 2012 waived the Jones Act forLouisiana to South Carolina, Georgia, Florida and Puerto Rico. The waiver was specifically tailored to address the transportation of refined petroleum products due to disruptions in hurricane-affected areas. On September 11, 2017, the Northeast followingwaiver was extended for 11 days and expanded to include additional states. Following Hurricane Sandy.Maria, on September 28, 2017, the Department of Homeland Security issued a waiver of the Jones Act for movement of products shipped from United States coastwise points to Puerto Rico through October 18, 2017. Waivers of the Jones Act, whether in response to natural disasters or otherwise, could result in increased competition from foreign tank vessel operators, which could negatively impact the marine transportation segment.

26

The Company’s marine transportation segment is subject to extensive regulation by the USCG, federal laws, other federal agencies, various state laws and certain international conventions, as well as numerous environmental regulations. The majority of the Company’s vessels are subject to inspection by the USCG and carry certificates of inspection. The crews employed by the Company aboard vessels are licensed or certified by the USCG. The Company is required by various governmental agencies to obtain licenses, certificates and permits for its owned and operated vessels. The Company’s operations are also affected by various United States and state regulations and legislation enacted for protection of the environment. The Company incurs significant expenses and capital expenditures to comply with applicable laws and regulations and any significant new regulation or legislation, including climate change laws or regulations, could have an adverse effect on the Company.


The Company is subject to risks associated with possible climate change legislation, regulation and international accords. Greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon emissions or energy use, have increasingly become the subject of a large amount of international, national, regional, state and local attention. Pursuant to an April 2007 decision of the United States Supreme Court, the EPA was required to consider if carbon dioxide was a pollutant that endangers public health. On December 7, 2009, the EPA furthered its focus on greenhouse gas emissions when it issued its endangerment finding in response to a decision of“endangerment finding” regarding greenhouse gasses under the Supreme Court of the United States.CAA. The EPA found that the emission of six greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (which is emitted from the combustion of fossil fuels), may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health and welfare. Based on this finding, the EPA defined the mix of these six greenhouse gases to be “air pollution” subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act.CAA. Although the EPA has stated a preference that greenhouse gas regulation be based on new federal legislation rather than the existing Clean Air Act,CAA, many sources of greenhouse gas emissions may be regulated without the need for further legislation.


The United States Congress has considered in the past legislation that would create an economy-wide “cap-and-trade” system that would establish a limit (or cap) on overall greenhouse gas emissions and create a market for the purchase and sale of emissions permits or “allowances.” Any proposed cap-and-trade legislation would likely affect the chemical industry due to anticipated increases in energy costs as fuel providers pass on the cost of the emissions allowances, which they would be required to obtain under cap-and-trade to cover the emissions from fuel production and the eventual use of fuel by the Company or its energy suppliers. In addition, cap-and-trade proposals would likely increase the cost of energy, including purchases of diesel fuel, steam and electricity, and certain raw materials used or transported by the Company. Proposed domestic and international cap-and-trade systems could materially increase raw material and operating costs of the Company’s customer base. Future environmental regulatory developments related to climate change in the United States that restrict emissions of greenhouse gases could result in financial impacts on the Company’s operations that cannot be predicted with certainty at this time.


28



The Company’s marine transportation segment is subject to volatility in the United States production of petrochemicals. For 2016, 49%2019, 54% of the marine transportation segment’s revenues were from the movement of petrochemicals, including the movement of raw materials and feedstocks from one refinery or petrochemical plant to another, as well as the movement of more finished products to end users and terminals for export. During 2016,2019, petrochemical volumes were stable compared with 2015.  Petrochemical volumes improved during 2015 compared with 2014.increased relative to 2018 and 2017, primarily as a result of new petrochemical capacity which came online in recent years. The United States petrochemical industry continues to benefit from a low-cost domestically produced natural gas feedstock advantage, producing strong volumes of raw materials and intermediate products for transportation between Gulf Coast petrochemical plants and the transportation of more finished products to terminals for both domestic consumers and for export destinations. In addition, approximately 20 new United States petrochemical projects, including expansion of existing plants or new plants, are scheduled to be completed during 2020 and 2021, which should provide additional movements for the marine transportation segment. Higher natural gas prices and other factors could negatively impact the United States petrochemical industry and its production volumes, which would negatively impact the Company.

27

The Company’s marine transportation segment could be adversely impacted by the construction of tank barges by its competitors. At the present time, there are an estimated 3,850 inland tank barges in the United States, of which the Company operates 876,1,053, or 23%27%. The number of tank barges peaked at an estimated 4,200 in 1982, slowly declined to 2,750 by 2003, and then gradually increased to an estimated 3,850 by the end of 2015 and 2016. During 2014, the2016 and remained relatively flat since 2015.  The Company estimates that 300industry-wide 75 tank barges were placed in service of which 61 were for the Company, and 100 tank barges were retired, 38 of which were by the Company. During 2015, the Company estimates that 260 tank barges were placed in service, of which 36 were for the Company, and 60 tank barges were retired, 18 of which were by the Company. For 2016, the Company estimated that industry-wide 100 tank barges were placed in service,during 2017, of which five were by the Company, and 100 tank barges were retired, 5054 of which were by the Company. For 2018, the Company estimated that industry-wide 75 tank barges were placed in service, of which one was by the Company, and 100 tank barges were retired, 48 of which were by the Company.  For 2019, the Company estimated that industry-wide 150 new tank barges were placed in service, of which none were by the Company, and 100 tank barges were retired, 17 of which were by the Company.  The increasesincrease for 2014 and part of 2015 reflectreflected the improved demand for inland petrochemical, refined petroleum products and black oil barges experienced in 2014 and federal tax incentives on new equipment. StrongThe decrease in the number of tank barges at the end of 2017 and 2018 was primarily due to continued industry-wide tank barge markets for 2014retirements and part of 2015 absorbed the additional capacity built by the industry. With the decline in demand for crude oil and natural gas condensate movements by inlandminimal new tank barges in 2015 and 2016 and the movement of such barges to other markets, thebarge construction. The Company estimates that approximately 40130 tank barges werehave been ordered during 20162019 for delivery throughout 2017, two of which are for the Company,2020 and expects many older tank barges, including an expected 32four by the Company, will be retired, dependent on 20172020 market conditions.


The long-term risk of an oversupply of inland tank barges may be mitigated by the fact that the inland tank barge industry has a mature fleet. Of the estimated 3,850approximately 350 tank barges in the industry at the present time, approximately 600that are over 30 years old and approximately 270240 of those over 40 years old. Given the age profile of the industry inland tank barge fleet, the expectation is that older tank barges will continue to be removed from service and replaced by new tank barges that will enter the fleet,as needed, given extensive customer vetting standards, with the extent of theboth retirements and new builds dependent on 2017 petrochemical and refinery production levels and crude oil and natural gas condensate movements, both of which can have a direct effect on industry-wide tank barge utilization, as well as term and spot contract rates.


During 20142017, 2018, and the majority of 2015, the coastal operations reflected improvements in market conditions with tank barge utilization in the 90% to 95% range, occasionally declining to the high-80% level during portions of the 2015 fourth quarter. During 2014 and the majority of 2015, the Company experienced increased demand for coastal crude oil and natural gas condensate moves and success in expanding the coastal customer base to include inland customers with coastal requirements. During the 2015 fourth quarter and all of 2016,2019, a decline in industry-wide demand for the movement of crude oil and natural gas condensate transportation volumes increased available capacity and resulted in some reluctance among certain customers to extend term contracts, which led to an increase in the number of coastal vessels operating in the spot market. In addition, the Company and the industry added new coastal tank barge capacity during 20152017, 2018 and 2016,2019 with additional new capacity coming on-line in 2017 and 2018.2020. Much of this new capacity is replacement capacity for older vessels anticipated to be retired.


The Company estimates there are approximately 295280 tank barges operating in the 195,000 barrel or less coastal industry fleet, the sector of the market in which the Company operates, and approximately 3520 of those are over 3025 years old.  OneIn June 2018, the Company purchased a 155,000 barrel coastal ATB under construction from another operator that was delivered to the Company in the 2018 fourth quarter.  The Company is aware of seven coastal tank barge and tugboat unit was built and placed in service by a competitor during 2014. In January 2014, the Company signed an agreement to construct a 185,000 barrel coastal articulated tank barge and tugboat unit (“ATB”) and, in April 2014, the Company exercised its option for the construction of a second 185,000 barrel coastal ATB. The first unit wasunits placed in service in late 20152017, three in 2018, and the secondtwo in June 2016.  In July 2014, the Company signed agreements to construct two 155,000 barrel coastal ATBs.  The first unit was placed in service in November 2016 and the second unit is scheduled to be placed in service in the summer of  2017.  The Company also took delivery in December 2016 of a 35,000 barrel coastal petrochemical tank barge.  The Company is aware of eight coastal tank barges placed in service in 20162019 by competitors and 11competitors.  There are currently four announced coastal tank barge and tugboat units in the 195,000 barrel or less category under construction by competitors for delivery in 20172020 and 2018.2021.  Two of these coastal ATB units under construction are greater than 195,000 barrels.


29



Higher fuel prices could increase operating expenses and fuel price volatility could reduce profitability. The cost of fuel during 20162019 was approximately 7%9% of marine transportation revenue. All of the Company’s marine transportation term contracts contain fuel escalation clauses, or the customer pays for the fuel. However, there is generally a 30 to 90 day delay before contracts are adjusted depending on the specific contract. In general, the fuel escalation clauses are effective over the long-term in allowing the Company to adjust to changes in fuel costs due to fuel price changes; however, the short-term effectiveness of the fuel escalation clauses can be affected by a number of factors including, but not limited to, specific terms of the fuel escalation formulas, fuel price volatility, navigating conditions, tow sizes, trip routing, and the location of loading and discharge ports that may result in the Company over or under recovering its fuel costs. SpotThe Company’s spot contract rates generally reflect current fuel prices at the time the contract is signed but do not have escalators for fuel.

28

Loss of a large customer or other significant business relationship could adversely affect the Company. Four Five marine transportation customers accounted for approximately 25%19% of the Company’s 2016, 30%2019, 18% of 20152018 and 25%23% of 20142017 revenue. The Company has contracts with these customers expiring in 2020 through 2027. Three distribution and services customers accounted for approximately 12% of the Company’s 2019 revenue, 13% of 2018 revenue, and 14% of 2017 through 2021.revenue. Although the Company considers its relationships with these companies to be strong, the loss of any of these customers could have an adverse effect on the Company.


The Company’s diesel enginedistribution and services segment has had a 51-year relationship with EMD, the largest manufacturer of medium-speed diesel engines. In addition, theengines, for over 50 years. The Company, through Kirby Engine Systems, serves as both an EMD distributor and service center for select markets and locations for both service and parts. With the acquisition of S&S in September 2017, the Company added additional EMD exclusive distributorship rights in key states, primarily through the Central, South and Eastern areas of the United States. With the S&S acquisition, the Company became the United States distributor for EMD marine and power generation applications. Sales and service of EMD products account for approximately 3%4% of the Company’s revenues for 2016.2019. Although the Company considers its relationship with EMD to be strong, the loss of the EMD distributorship and service rights, or a disruption of the supply of EMD parts, could have a negative impact on the Company’s ability to service its customers.


United hasand S&S have maintained continuous exclusive distribution rights for MTU and Allison since 1946.the 1940s. United is oneand S&S are two of MTU’s top five distributors of off-highway engines in North America, with exclusive distribution rights in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi.multiple states. In addition, as a distributordistributors of Allison products, United hasand S&S have exclusive distribution rights in Oklahoma, Arkansasmultiple key growth states. United and Louisiana. United isS&S are also the distributor for parts, service and warranty on Daimler truck engines and related equipment in Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana.multiple states. Sales and service of MTU and Allison products accounted for approximately 3%17% of the Company’s revenues during 2016.2019. Although the Company considers its relationships with MTU and Allison to be strong, the loss of MTU, Allison or Daimler distributorships and service rights, or a disruption of the supply of MTU or Allison parts, could have a negative impact on the Company’s ability to service its customers.


The Company is subject to competition in both its marine transportation and diesel enginedistribution and services segments. The inland and coastal tank barge industry remains very fragmented and competitive. The Company’s primary competitors are noncaptive inland tank barge operators and coastal operators. The Company also competes with companies who operate refined product and petrochemical pipelines, railroad tank cars and tractor-trailer tank trucks. Increased competition from any significant expansion of or additions to facilities or equipment by the Company’s competitors could have a negative impact on the Company’s results of operations. In addition, the Company’s failure to adhere to its safety, reliability and performance standards may impact its ability to retain current customers or attract new customers.


The diesel enginedistribution and services industry is also very competitive. The segment’s primary marine diesel competitors are independent diesel services companiesoil and other factory-authorized distributors, authorized service centers and authorized marine dealers. Certain operators of diesel powered marine equipment also elect to maintain in-house service capabilities. In the power generation market, the primary competitors are other independent service companies. The segment’s land-basedgas market’s principal competitors are independent diesel enginedistribution and service and oilfield manufacturing companies and other factory-authorized distributors and service centers. In addition, certain oilfield service companies that are customers of the Company also manufacture and service a portion of their own oilfield equipment. Increased competition in the diesel enginedistribution and services industry and continued low price of natural gas, crude oil or natural gas condensate, and resulting decline in drilling for such natural resources in North American shale formations, could result in less oilfield equipment being manufactured and remanufactured, lower rates for service and parts pricing and result in less manufacturing, remanufacturing, service and repair opportunities and parts sales for the Company. For the commercial and industrial market, the segment’s primary marine diesel competitors are independent diesel services companies and other factory-authorized distributors, authorized service centers and authorized marine dealers. Certain operators of diesel powered marine equipment also elect to maintain in-house service capabilities. For power generation, the primary competitors are other independent service companies.


30



Significant increases in the construction cost of tank barges and towing vessels may limit the Company’s ability to earn an adequate return on its investment in new tank barges and towing vessels.vessels. The price of steel, increasedeconomic conditions, and supply and demand dynamics can significantly from 2006 to 2009, thereby increasingimpact the construction cost of new tank barges and towing vessels. TheOver the last 20 years, the Company’s average construction price for a new 30,000 barrel capacity inland tank barge orderedhas fluctuated up or down significantly. For example, the average construction price for a new 30,000 barrel capacity tank barge in 2008 for 2009 delivery was approximately 90% higher than in 2000, with increases primarily duerelated to the increase inhigher steel prices.costs. During 2009, the United States and global recession negatively impacted demand levels for inland tank barges and as a result, the construction price of inland tank barges for 2010 delivery fell significantly in 2010, primarily due to a significant decrease in steel prices, as well as a decrease in the number of tank barges ordered. The averageIn 2018 and 2019, increases in steel costs and improvement in supply and demand dynamics resulted in construction priceprices for a new 30,000 barrel tank barge increasing compared to prices in 2017 when there was an industry-wide over-capacity of inland tank barges delivered since 2010 steadily increased until reaching its peak in early 2015, but remained below the construction price for tank barges delivered in 2009. Construction costs for inland tank barges ordered in 2016 for delivery in 2017 have declined, reflecting the current industry-wide over-capacity in the inland tank barge market and subsequent decline in the number of tank barges ordered for delivery in 2017.market.

29

The Company’s marine transportation segment could be adversely impacted by the failure of the Company’s shipyard vendors to deliver new vessels according to contractually agreed delivery schedules and terms. The Company contracts with shipyards to build new vessels and currently has many vessels under construction. Construction projects are subject to risks of delay and cost overruns, resulting from shortages of equipment, materials and skilled labor; lack of shipyard availability; unforeseen design and engineering problems; work stoppages; weather interference; unanticipated cost increases; unscheduled delays in the delivery of material and equipment; and financial and other difficulties at shipyards including labor disputes, shipyard insolvency and inability to obtain necessary certifications and approvals. A significant delay in the construction of new vessels or a shipyard’s inability to perform under the construction contract could negatively impact the Company’s ability to fulfill contract commitments and to realize timely revenues with respect to vessels under construction. Significant cost overruns or delays for vessels under construction could also adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.


The Company’s diesel enginedistribution and services segment could be adversely impacted by future legislation or additional regulation of hydraulic fracturing practices. The Company, through its United subsidiary,and S&S subsidiaries, is a distributor and service provider of engine and transmission related products for the oil and gas services, power generation and transportation industries, and a manufacturer of oilfield service equipment, including pressure pumping units. The EPA is studying hydraulic fracturing practices, and legislation may be introduced in Congress that would authorize the EPA to impose additional regulations on hydraulic fracturing. In addition, a number of states have adopted or are evaluating the adoption of legislation or regulations governing hydraulic fracturing.fracturing or byproducts of the fracturing process. Such federal or state legislation and/or regulations could materially impact customers’ operations and greatly reduce or eliminate demand for the Company’s pressure pumping fracturing equipment and related products. The Company is unable to predict whether future legislation or any other regulations will ultimately be enacted and, if so, the impact on the Company’s diesel enginedistribution and services segment.


The Company relies on critical information systems for the operation of its businesses, and the failure of any critical information system, including a cyber-security breach, may adversely impact its businesses. The Company is dependent on its technology infrastructure and must maintain and rely upon critical information systems for the effective and safe operation of its businesses. These information systems include software applications and hardware equipment, as well as data networks and telecommunications.


The Company’s information systems, including the Company’s proprietary vessel management computer system, are subject to damage or interruption from a number of potential sources, including but not limited to, natural disasters, software viruses, power failures and cyber-attacks. The Company has implemented measures such as emergency recovery processes, virus protection software, intrusion detection systems and annual attack and penetration audits to mitigate these risks. However, the Company cannot guarantee that its information systems cannot be damaged or compromised.


31



Any damage or compromise of its data security or its inability to use or access these critical information systems could adversely impact the efficient and safe operation of its businesses, or result in the failure to maintain the confidentiality of data of its customers or its employees and could subject the Company to increased operating expenses or legal action, which could have an adverse effect on the Company.

30

Prevailing natural gas and crude oil prices, as well as the volatility of their prices, could have an adverse effect on the Company’s businesses. Demand for tank barge transportation services is driven by the production of volumes of the bulk liquid commodities such as petrochemicals, black oil and refined petroleum products that the Company transports by tank barge. This production can depend on the prevailing level of natural gas and crude oil prices, as well as the volatility of their prices.


In general, lower energy prices are good for the United States economy and typically translate into increased petrochemical and refined product productiondemand and therefore increased demand for tank barge transportation services. However, during 20152016 and 20162017 lower crude oil prices resulted in a decline in domestic crude oil and natural gas condensate production and reduced volumes to be transported by tank barge. The Company estimates that at the beginning of 2015 there were approximately 550 inland tank barges and 35 coastal tank barges in the 195,000 barrels or less category transporting crude oil and natural gas condensate. At the end of 2016, the Company estimatesestimated that approximately 140 inland tank barges and approximately ten10 coastal tank barges in the 195,000 barrel or less category were transporting such products, a reduction of approximately 410 inland tank barges and 25 coastal tank barges that have moved into other markets. At the end of 2017, the Company estimated that approximately 250 inland tank barges and approximately three coastal tank barges were transporting crude and natural gas condensate. At the end of 2018, the Company estimates that approximately 375 inland tank barges and approximately three coastal tank barges were transporting crude and natural gas condensate. As of the end of 2019, the Company estimates that approximately 335 inland tank barges and approximately five coastal tank barges were transporting crude and natural gas condensate. Volatility in the price of natural gas and crude oil can also result in heightened uncertainty which may lead to decreased production and delays in new petrochemical and refinery plant construction. Increased competition for available black oil and petrochemical barge moves caused by reduced crude oil and natural gas condensate production could have an adverse impact on the Company’s marine transportation segment.


Lower energy prices generally result in a decrease in the number of oil and gas wells being drilled. Oilfield service companies reduce their capital spending, resulting in decreased demand for new parts and equipment, including pressure pumping units, provided by the Company’s diesel enginedistribution and services segment. This may also lead to order cancellations from customers or customers requesting to delay delivery of new equipment. The Company also services offshore supply vessels and offshore drillings rigs operating in the Gulf of Mexico, as well as internationally. Low energy prices may negatively impact the number of wells drilled in the Gulf of Mexico and international waters. In addition to the possibility that decreased energyProlonged downturns in oil and gas prices may resultcause substantial declines in reduced demand for the Company’s services,oilfield service and exploration expenditures and could adversely impact oil and gas manufacturing, remanufacturing, parts and equipment,distribution business. In addition, energy price volatility may also result in difficulties in the Company’s ability to ramp up and ramp down production on a timely basis and, therefore, could result in an adverse impact on the Company’s diesel enginedistribution and services segment.


The Company’s diesel enginedistribution and services segment could be adversely impacted by the construction of pressure pumping units by its competitors. In early 2015, an estimated 19.521.0 million horsepower of pressure pumping units were working, or available to work, in North America. By late 2016, the working horsepower in North America hashad declined to an estimated 9.06.0 million, with an estimated 4.52.0 million horsepower scrapped, an estimated 2.0 million horsepower available for work and an estimated 4.012.5 million horsepower stacked, the large majority of which would require major service before being placed back in service. A significant drop in demand due to the low price of crude oil resulted in an oversupply in the pressure pumping market and negatively impacted the Company’s 20162015 and 20152016 results of operations. During 2017 and 2018, with the stabilization of crude oil prices in the $40 to $70 per barrel range, the United States land rig count improved and service intensity in the well completion business increased. As a result, the Company experienced a healthy rebound in service demand during 2018, particularly with pressure pumping unit remanufacturing and transmission overhauls, and with the acquisition of S&S in September 2017, the manufacture of oilfield service equipment, including pressure pumping units, and the sale of transmissions.  At the end of 2019, an estimated 15.0 million horsepower of pressure pumping units were working in North America, with an estimated 6.0 million horsepower available to work, and 3.0 million horsepower stacked and in need of major repair.  Increased expansion of, or additions to, facilities or equipment by the Company’s competitors could have a negative impact on the Company’s results of operations.


32



Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments


Not applicable.


Item 2.Properties


The information appearing in Item 1 under “Marine Transportation– Properties” and “Diesel Engine“Distribution and Services– Properties” is incorporated herein by reference. The Company believes that its facilities are adequate for its needs and additional facilities would be available if required.

31

Item 3.Legal Proceedings


In 2009, the Company was named by the EPA as a Potentially Responsible Party (“PRP”) in addition to a group of approximately 250 named PRPs under CERCLA with respect to a Superfund site, the Portland Harbor Superfund site (“Portland Harbor”) in Portland, Oregon. The site was declared a Superfund site in December 2000 as a result of historical heavily industrialized use due to manufacturing, shipbuilding, petroleum storage and distribution, metals salvaging, and electrical power generation activities which led to contamination of Portland Harbor, an urban and industrial reach of the lower Willamette River located immediately downstream of downtown Portland. The Company’s involvement arises from four spills at the site after it was declared a Superfund site, as a result of predecessor entities’ actions in the area. To date, there is no information suggesting the extent of the costs or damages to be claimed from the 250 notified PRPs. Based on the nature of the involvement at the Portland Harbor site, the Company believes its potential contribution is de minimis; however, to date neither the EPA nor the named PRPs have performed an allocation of potential liability in connection with the site nor have they provided costs and expenses in connection with the site.


In JanuaryOn February 20, 2015, the Company was namedserved as a defendant in a Complaint originally filed on August 14, 2014 in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Texas - Houston Division, USOR Site PRP Group vs. A&M Contractors, USES, Inc. et al. This is a civil action pursuant to the provisions of CERCLA and the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act for recovery of past and future response costs incurred and to be incurred by the USOR Site PRP Group for response activities at the U.S. Oil Recovery Superfund Site. The property was a former sewage treatment plant owned by defendant City of Pasadena, Texas from approximately 1945 until it was acquired by U.S. Oil Recovery in January 2009. Throughout its operating life, the U.S. Oil Recovery facility portion of the USOR Site received and performed wastewater pretreatment of municipal and Industrial Class I and Class II wastewater, characteristically hazardous waste, used oil and oily sludges, and municipal solid waste. Associated operations were conducted at the MCC Recycling facility portion of the USOR Site after it was acquired by U.S. Oil Recovery from the City of Pasadena in January 2009. Initially,The EPA and the plaintiff stayed prosecutionPRP Group entered into an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order for Remedial Investigation Study (“Study”) in May 2015. The Study has not been completed by EPA to date. The Company joined as a member of the case pending responses to initial settlement demands. In January 2016, the Company filed responsive pleadings in this matter. Based on the nature of the involvementPRP Group companies at the USOR Site, the Company believes its potential contribution is de minimis; however, to date neither the EPA nor the named PRPs have performed an allocation of potential liability in connection with the site nor have they provided costs and expenses in connection with the site.pro-rata allocated share.


On October 13, 2016, the Company, as a successor to Hollywood Marine, Inc., was issued a General Notice under CERCLA by the EPA in which it was named as a PRP for liabilities associated with the SBA Shipyard Site located near Jennings, Louisiana (“Site”(the “Site”). The Site was added to the EPA’s National Priorities List of sites under CERCLA in September 2016. SBA used the facility for construction, repair, retrofitting, sandblasting, and cleaning and painting of barges beginning in 1965. Three barge slips and a dry dock are located off the Mermentau River. The slips were used to dock barges during cleaning or repair. In 2001, a group of PRPs that had been former customers of the SBA Shipyard facility formed an organization called the SSIC Remediation, LLC (hereinafter, “the PRP Group Companies”) to address removal actions at the Site. In 2002, EPA approved an Interim Measures/Removal Action of Hazardous/Principal Threat Wastes at SBA Shipyards, Inc. (pursuant to RCRA Section 3008(h)) that was proposed by SBA Shipyard and the PRP Group Companies. Interim removal activities were conducted from March 2001 through January 2005 under an EPA 2002 Order and Agreement. In September 2012, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality requested EPA address the SBA Shipyard siteSite under CERCLA authority. The Company, is investigatingas a successor to Hollywood Marine, joined the PRP Group Companies. The PRP Group Companies have submitted a draft Study work plan to EPA for their review and comment. Higman Marine, Inc. and its activitiesaffiliated companies (“Higman”) was named as a PRP in connection with its activities at the Site. Higman is not a participant in the PRP Group Companies.


33



With respect to the above sites, the Company has recorded reserves, if applicable, for its estimated potential liability for its portion of the EPA’s past costs claim based on information developed to date including various factors such as the Company’s liability in proportion to other responsible partiesPRPs and the extent to which such costs are recoverable from third parties.


On May 10, 2019, two tank barges and a towboat, the M/V Voyager, owned and operated by Kirby Inland Marine, were struck by the LPG tanker, the Genesis River, in the Houston Ship Channel. The bow of the Genesis River penetrated the Kirby 30015T and capsized the MMI 3014. The collision penetrated the hull of the Kirby 30015T causing its cargo, reformate, to be discharged into the water. The USCG and the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB”) designated the owner and pilot of the Genesis River as well as the subsidiary of the Company as parties of interest in their investigation into the cause of the incident. On June 19, 2019, the Company filed a limitation action in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Texas - Galveston Division seeking limitation of liability and asserting the Genesis River and her owner/manager are at fault for damages including removal costs and claims under OPA and maritime law. Multiple claimants have filed claims in the limitation seeking damages under the OPA. The Company has various insurance policies covering liabilities including pollution, marine and general liability and believes that it has satisfactory insurance coverage for the potential liabilities arising from the incident. The Company believes it has accrued adequate reserves for the incident and does not expect the incident to have a material adverse effect on its business or financial condition.

On October 13, 2016, the tug Nathan E. Stewart and barge DBL 55, an articulated tank bargeATB owned and tugboat unit,operated by Kirby Offshore Marine, ran aground at the entrance to Seaforth Channel on Atholone Island, British Columbia. The grounding resulted in a breach of a portion of the Nathan E. Stewart’s fuel tanks causing a discharge of diesel fuel into the water. The USCG and the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB”)NTSB designated the Company as a party of interest in their investigation as to the cause of the incident. The Canadian authorities including Transport Canada and the Canadian Transportation Safety Board are also investigatinginvestigated the cause of the incident. TheOn October 10, 2018, the Heiltsuk First Nation filed a civil action in the British Columbia Supreme Court against a subsidiary of the Company, is subject to claims from third parties as well as the provincialmaster and federalpilot of the tug, the vessels and the Canadian government seeking unquantified damages as a result of the incident. On May 1, 2019, the Company filed a limitation action in the Federal Court of Canada seeking limitation of liability relating to the incident as provided under admiralty law. The Heiltsuk First Nation’s civil claim has been consolidated into the Federal Court of Canada limitation action as of July 26, 2019 and it is expected that the Federal Court of Canada will decide all claims against the Company. The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure in the civil proceeding. On July 16, 2019, the Company and the Canadian government settled the charges against the subsidiary of the Company. The subsidiary of the Company agreed to pay the Canadian government a fine of approximately $2,900,000 Canadian dollars ($2,200,000 U.S. dollars) for violations of the Canadian Fisheries Act, the Migratory Birds Convention Act, the Pilotage Act and the Shipping Act of 2001. The Company has various insurance policies covering liabilities including pollution, property, marine and general liability and believes that it has satisfactory insurance coverage for the cost of cleanup and salvage operations as well as other potential liabilities arising from the incident. The Company believes it has accrued adequate reserves for the incident and does not expect the incident to have a material adverse effect on its business or financial condition.
32


On March 22, 2014, two tank barges and a towboat, (thethe M/V Miss Susan),Susan, owned by Kirby Inland Marine, LP, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, were involved in a collision with the M/S Summer Wind on the Houston Ship Channel near Texas City, Texas. The lead tank barge was damaged in the collision resulting in a discharge of intermediate fuel oil from one of its cargo tanks.  The USCG and the NTSB namedWhile all legal action to date involving the Company andhas been resolved, the Captain of the M/V Miss Susan, as well as the owner and the pilot of the M/S Summer Wind, as parties of interest in their investigation as to the cause of the incident. Sea Galaxy Ltd is the owner of the M/S Summer Wind. The Company is participating in the natural resource damage assessment and restoration process with federal and state government natural resource trustees.

The Company and the owner of the M/S Summer Wind filed actions in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas seeking exoneration from or limitation of liability relating to the foregoing incident as provided for in the federal rules of procedure for maritime claims. The two actions were consolidated for procedural purposes since they both arise out of the same occurrence. Multiple parties filed claims in limitation seeking various damages under OPA, including claims for business interruption, loss of profit and loss of use of natural resources (OPA claimants). On November 2, 2016, the Company, the M/S Summer Wind and its owners and the OPA claimants entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which the parties have resolved their respective claims against one another. The dismissal of the OPA claims was entered by the Court on November 14, 2016.

The Company has also been named as a defendant in a civil action by two crewmembers of the M/V Miss Susan, alleging damages under the general maritime law and the Jones Act. The Company is defending the civil action in the proceeding in Galveston Civil District Court. The Company is processing claims that have not been filed in the limitation matter that are properly presented, documented and recoverable under OPA.

On September 13, 2016, the Company entered into a Consent Decree with the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to settle civil penalty provisions under Section 311(b) of the Clean Water Act involving the discharge of intermediate fuel oil as a result of the collision between the tank barge and the M/S Summer Wind. Under the Consent Decree, the Company agreed to pay a civil penalty of $4,900,000 and undertake certain actions relating to navigation procedures. On September 27, 2016, the DOJ filed the proposed Consent Decree with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas along with an Original Complaint setting out the allegations that the Company is civilly liable for violation of Section 311(b) of the Clean Water Act. The Consent Decree was approved by the federal court on November 14, 2016.

The Company believes it has adequate insurance coverage for pollution, marine and other potential liabilities arising from the incident. The Company believes it has accrued adequate reserves for the incident and does not expect the incident to have a material adverse effect on its business or financial condition.


In addition, the Company is involved in various legal and other proceedings which are incidental to the conduct of its business, none of which in the opinion of management will have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Management believes that it has recorded adequate reserves and believes that it has adequate insurance coverage or has meritorious defenses for these other claims and contingencies.


Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures


Not applicable.

33
34



PART II


Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


The Company’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol KEX. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share for the common stock for the periods indicated:

  Sales Price 
  High  Low 
2017      
First Quarter (through February 22, 2017) $73.40  $61.65 
2016        
First Quarter  63.03   44.63 
Second Quarter  73.25   57.92 
Third Quarter  64.85   50.80 
Fourth Quarter  70.90   55.11 
2015        
First Quarter  82.91   70.89 
Second Quarter  84.24   73.31 
Third Quarter  78.72   59.54 
Fourth Quarter  69.05   50.42 


As of February 22, 2017,20, 2020, the Company had 53,957,00059,984,000 outstanding shares held by approximately 740570 stockholders of record; however, the Company believes the number of beneficial owners of common stock exceeds this number.


The Company does not have an established dividend policy. Decisions regarding the payment of future dividends will be made by the Board of Directors based on the facts and circumstances that exist at that time. Since 1989, the Company has not paid any dividends on its common stock. The Company’s credit agreements contain covenants restricting the payment of dividends by the Company at any time when there is a default under the agreements.

34

Item 6.Selected Financial Data


The comparative selected financial data of the Company and consolidated subsidiaries is presented for the five years ended December 31, 2016.2019. The information should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Company in Item 7 and the Financial Statements included under Item 8 (selected financial data in thousands, except per share amounts).


 December 31, 
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  Year Ended December 31, 
                2019  2018  2017  2016  2015 
Revenues:                              
Marine transportation $1,471,893  $1,663,090  $1,770,684  $1,713,167  $1,408,893  $1,587,082  $1,483,143  $1,324,106  $1,471,893  $1,663,090 
Diesel engine services  298,780   484,442   795,634   529,028   703,765 
Distribution and services  1,251,317   1,487,554   890,312   298,780   484,442 
 $1,770,673  $2,147,532  $2,566,318  $2,242,195  $2,112,658  $2,838,399  $2,970,697  $2,214,418  $1,770,673  $2,147,532 
                                        
Net earnings attributable to Kirby $141,406  $226,684  $282,006  $253,061  $209,438  $142,347  $78,452  $313,187  $141,406  $226,684 
                                        
Net earnings per share attributable to Kirby common stockholders:                                        
Basic $2.63  $4.12  $4.95  $4.46  $3.75  $2.38  $1.31  $5.62  $2.63  $4.12 
Diluted $2.62  $4.11  $4.93  $4.44  $3.73  $2.37  $1.31  $5.62  $2.62  $4.11 
Common stock outstanding:                                        
Basic  53,454   54,729   56,674   56,354   55,466   59,750   59,557   55,308   53,454   54,729 
Diluted  53,512   54,826   56,867   56,552   55,674   59,909   59,689   55,361   53,512   54,826 


 December 31,  December 31, 
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2019  2018  2017  2016  2015 
Property and equipment, net $2,921,374  $2,778,980  $2,589,498  $2,370,803  $2,315,165  $3,777,110  $3,539,802  $2,959,265  $2,921,374  $2,778,980 
Total assets $4,303,499  $4,152,281  $4,137,614  $3,675,860  $3,645,060  $6,079,097  $5,871,594  $5,127,427  $4,289,895  $4,140,558 
Long-term debt, including current portion $722,802  $774,849  $712,405  $742,493  $1,127,042  $1,369,767  $1,410,188  $992,406  $722,802  $774,849 
Total equity $2,412,867  $2,279,196  $2,264,913  $2,022,153  $1,707,054  $3,371,592  $3,216,301  $3,114,223  $2,412,867  $2,279,196 


35



Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not historical facts, including, but not limited to, any projections contained herein, are forward-looking statements and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” or “continue,” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. The actual results of the future events described in such forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K could differ materially from those stated in such forward-looking statements. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are: adverse economic conditions, industry competition and other competitive factors, adverse weather conditions such as high water, low water, tropical storms, hurricanes, tsunamis, fog and ice, tornados, marine accidents, lock delays, fuel costs, interest rates, construction of new equipment by competitors, government and environmental laws and regulations, and the timing, magnitude and number of acquisitions made by the Company. For a more detailed discussion of factors that could cause actual results to differ from those presented in forward-looking statements, see Item 1A-Risk Factors. Forward-looking statements are based on currently available information and the Company assumes no obligation to update any such statements.


For purposes of Management’s Discussion, all net earnings per share attributable to Kirby common stockholders are “diluted earnings per share.” The weighted average number of common shares outstanding applicable to diluted earnings per share for 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 were 53,512,000, 54,826,00059,909,000, 59,689,000 and 56,867,000,55,361,000, respectively. The decreaseincrease in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for 2016 and 20152019 compared with 20142018 primarily reflects common stock repurchases in the 2014 fourth quarter through the 2016 first quarter, partially offset by the issuance of restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and the exercise of stock options.  The increase in the weighted average number of common shares for 2018 compared with 2017 primarily reflects the issuance of 5,696,259 shares of common stock associated with the acquisition of S&S on September 13, 2017 and the issuance of restricted stock and RSUs and the exercise of stock options.
35


Overview


The Company is the nation’s largest domestic tank barge operator, transporting bulk liquid products throughout the Mississippi River System, on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, coastwise along all three United States coasts, and in Alaska and Hawaii. The Company transports petrochemicals, black oil, refined petroleum products and agricultural chemicals by tank barge. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company operated a fleet of 8761,053 inland tank barges with 17.923.4 million barrels of capacity, and operated an average of 234299 inland towboats during 2016.2019. The Company’s coastal fleet consisted of 6949 tank barges with 6.24.7 million barrels of capacity and 7547 coastal tugboats. The Company also owns and operates sixfour offshore dry-bulk cargo barges, sixfour offshore tugboats and one docking tugboat transporting dry-bulk commodities in United States coastal trade. Through its diesel enginedistribution and services segment, the Company provides after-market servicesservice and parts for medium-speed and high-speed diesel engines, transmissions, reduction gears, and ancillary products forrelated equipment used in oilfield services, marine, and power generation, applications, distributeson-highway, and services high-speed diesel engines, transmissionsother industrial applications. The Company also rents equipment including generators, industrial compressors, railcar movers, and pumps,high capacity lift trucks for use in a variety of industrial markets, and manufactures and remanufactures oilfield service equipment, including pressure pumping units, for the land-based oilfield service and oil and gas operator and producer markets.customers.


For 2016,2019, net earnings attributable to Kirby were $141,406,000,$142,347,000, or $2.62$2.37 per share, on revenues of $1,770,673,000,$2,838,399,000, compared with 20152018 net earnings attributable to Kirby of $226,684,000,$78,452,000, or $4.11$1.31 per share, on revenues of $2,147,532,000.$2,970,697,000. The 2019 fourth quarter included $35,525,000 before taxes, $27,978,000 after taxes, or $0.47 per share, non-cash inventory write-downs and $4,757,000 before taxes, $3,747,000 after taxes, or $0.06 per share, severance and early retirement expense.  The 2018 year reflected the integration of Targa Resources Corp.’s (“Targa”) pressure barge fleet, acquired on May 10, 2018, and the integration of Higman, acquired on February 14, 2018. The 2018 fourth quarter included $85,108,000 before taxes, $67,235,000 after taxes, or $1.12 per share, non-cash impairment of long-lived assets and lease cancellation costs and $2,702,000 before taxes, $2,135,000 after taxes, or $0.04 per share, non-cash impairment of goodwill.  The 2018 second quarter included a one-time non-deductible expense of $18,057,000, or $0.30 per share, related to the retirement of Joseph H. Pyne as executive Chairman of the Board of Directors, effective April 30, 2018. The 2018 first quarter included $3,261,000 before taxes, or $0.04 per share, of one-time transaction costs associated with the Higman acquisition, as well as $2,912,000 before taxes, or $0.04 per share, of severance and retirement expenses, primarily related to cost reduction initiatives in the coastal marine transportation market and the integration of Higman.


36



Marine Transportation


For 2016, 83%2019, 56% of the Company’s revenues were generated by its marine transportation segment. The segment’s customers include many of the major petrochemical and refining companies that operate in the United States. Products transported include intermediate materials used to produce many of the end products used widely by businesses and consumers — plastics, fiber, paints, detergents, oil additives and paper, among others, as well as residual fuel oil, ship bunkers, asphalt, gasoline, diesel fuel, heating oil, crude oil, natural gas condensate and agricultural chemicals. Consequently, the Company’s marine transportation business is directly affected by the volumes produced by the Company’s petroleum, petrochemical and refining customer base.


The Company’s marine transportation segment’s revenues for 2016 decreased 11%2019 increased 7% when compared with 2015.2018 and operating income increased 46%, when compared with 2018. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to lower inland marine transportation term and spot contract pricing, lower inland and coastal equipment utilization, a 24% decline in the average cost of marine diesel fuel which is largely passed through to the customer, and an increase in the number of coastal vessels operating in the spot market which led to increased idle time and decreased revenues, partially offset by the addition of the SEACOR Holdings Inc.Higman fleet acquired on February 14, 2018, the Targa pressure barge fleet acquired on May 10, 2018, the CGBM 100, LLC (“Seacor”CGBM”) inland tank barges acquired on December 14, 2018, and the Cenac Marine Services LLC (“Cenac”) fleet acquired on March 14, 2019, as well as improved barge utilization in April 2016. The segment’s operating income for 2016 decreased 31% compared with 2015. The decrease was primarily due to lower inlandthe coastal market and higher spot and term and spot contract pricing lowerin the inland and coastal equipment utilization,markets. Partially offsetting these increases during 2019 were unusually poor operating conditions due to heavy fog along the Gulf Coast, prolonged periods of ice on the Illinois River, high water on the Mississippi River System, closures of key waterways as a result of lock maintenance projects, extended delays in the Houston Ship Channel, and increased idle time and voyage costs forshipyard days on several large capacity coastal vessels during the 2019 first and higher depreciation expense, partially offsetfourth quarters.  Operating income for 2018 was impacted by savings from a reduction in force earlierthe Higman transaction costs and severance and retirement costs which were each incurred in the year2018 first quarter and during 2015,are discussed above.  For 2019 and a reduction in the average number of towboats operated. Marine transportation results for 2016 also included $3,792,000 of severance charges in the 2016 first quarter.  For 2016 and 2015,2018, the inland tank barge fleet contributed 67%77% and 68%76%, respectively, and the coastal fleet 33%contributed 23% and 32%24%, respectively, of marine transportation revenues.


InlandTank barge utilization levels in the Company’s inland marine transportation equipment utilization declined tomarkets averaged in the high 80% range at the end of 2016, occasionally declining to the low-to-mid 80%mid-90% range during the year,2019 first and second quarters and the low 90% range during the 2019 third quarter and fourth quarters.  For 2018, utilization ranged from the mid-90% range during the first quarter, high 80% to low 90% during the second quarter, and the low to 95%mid-90% range atduring the beginningthird and fourth quarters.  Strong demand from petrochemicals, black oil, refined petroleum products and agricultural chemicals customers, along with extensive delay days due to poor operating conditions which slowed the transport of 2016customer cargoes, contributed to increased utilization during the 2019 first and throughout 2015.  second quarters.  Better weather during the 2019 third quarter and receding flood waters on the Mississippi River System resulted in fewer delay days and contributed to modestly lower utilization during the 2019 third quarter. In the 2019 fourth quarter, weather conditions seasonally deteriorated, however, reduced refinery and chemical plant utilization for many of the Company’s major customers resulted in tank barge utilization remaining in the low 90% range for the quarter.

Coastal tank barge utilization levels also declined throughout 2016,averaged in the low 80% range during the 2019 first quarter and the mid-80% range during the 2019 second, third and fourth quarters.  In 2018, utilization improved from the high 80% to low 90%70% range induring the 2018 first quarter to the low 80% levelrange by end of 2018. The improvement in utilization in 2019 and throughout 2018 primarily reflected improved customer demand resulting in higher utilization of spot market capacity.  Utilization in the fourth quarter.  Coastal utilization levels were generallycoastal marine fleet continued to be impacted by the oversupply of smaller tank barges in the 90% to 95% range throughout the majority of 2015.coastal industry.
36


During the first nine months of 20162019 and all of 2015,2018, approximately 80%65% of the inland marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 20% were spot contract revenues.  During the 2016 fourth quarter, approximately 75% of inland marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 25%35% were spot contract revenues.  These allocations provide the operations with a more predictable revenue stream. Inland time charters, which insulate the Company from revenue fluctuations caused by weather and navigational delays and temporary market declines, represented 52%62% of the inland revenues under term contracts during 20162019 compared with 55%59% during 2015.2018. Rates on inland term contracts renewed in 2016 decreasedthe 2019 first quarter increased in the 5%4% to 9%6% average range compared with term contracts renewed in 2015.the 2018 first quarter. Rates on inland term contracts renewed in the 2019 second quarter increased in the 5% to 8% average range compared with term contracts renewed in the 2018 second quarter. Rates on inland term contracts renewed in the 2019 third quarter increased in the 3% to 4% average range compared with term contracts renewed in the 2018 third quarter. Rates on inland term contracts renewed in the 2019 fourth quarter increased in the 2% to 4% average range compared with term contracts renewed in the 2018 fourth quarter.  Spot contract rates, which include the cost of fuel, were relatively flatincreased approximately 20% in the 20162019 first quarter when compared with the 20152018 first quarter.  In both the 2019 second and third quarters, spot contract rates increased approximately 15% compared to the 2018 second and third quarters.  In the 2019 fourth quarter, and at or below termspot contract pricing duringrates increased approximately 5% compared with the balance of 2016.2018 fourth quarter.  Effective January 1, 2016,2019, annual escalators for labor and the producer price index on a number of inland multi-year contracts resulted in rate increases on those contracts of approximately 1.5%1.7%, excluding fuel.


37



During 20162019 and the 2015 third and fourth quarters,2018, approximately 80% of the coastal marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 20% were spot contract revenues. During the 2015 first and second quarters, approximately 85% of the coastal marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 15% were spot contract revenues.  The decrease in term contract revenues in 2016 and the 2015 third and fourth quarters reflected the continued trend of non-renewal of certain term contracts which put increased equipment in the spot contract market, leading to increased idle time.  However, the coastal revenues reflected the new 185,000 barrel ATB placed in service in the 2015 fourth quarter under a long-term contract. The second new 185,000 barrel ATB was placed in service in June 2016, also under a long-term contract.  Coastal time charters which insulate the Company from revenue fluctuations caused by weather and navigational delays and temporary market declines, represented approximately 85% of the coastal revenues under term contracts during 2019 and 2018.  Spot and term contract pricing in 2016 asthe coastal market are contingent on various factors including geographic location, vessel capacity, vessel type and product serviced.  Rates on coastal term contract renewed in each of the 2019 first, second, and third quarters increased in the 4% to 6% average range compared to 90%with term contracts renewed in 2015.the 2018 first, second, and third quarters.  Rates on coastal term contracts renewed in 2016 were essentially flat whenthe 2019 fourth quarter increased in the 5% to 15% average range compared with term contracts renewed in 2015.the 2018 fourth quarter.  Spot contract rates remained above termin both the 2019 first and second quarters increased in the 10% to 15% average range compared to the 2018 first and second quarters.  In the 2019 third quarter, spot contract rates duringincreased approximately 20% compared to the 2016 first2018 third quarter.  In the 2019 fourth quarter, fluctuated around termspot contract rates duringincreased approximately 10% compared to the 2016 second quarter and fell below term contract rates during the 2016 third and2018 fourth quarters.quarter.


The 20162019 marine transportation operating margin was 17.5%13.6% compared with 22.5%9.9% for 2015. The results primarily reflected lower inland marine transportation term2018.

Distribution and spot contract pricing, lower coastal spot contract pricing, lower inland and coastal equipment utilization levels, an increase in the number of coastal vessels operating in the spot market which led to increased idle time and voyage costs, higher depreciation expense and the 2016 first quarter severance charge of $3,792,000, partially offset by savings from a reduction in force in early 2016 and during 2015, and a reduction in the average number of inland towboats operated.

Diesel Engine Services


During 2016,2019, the diesel enginedistribution and services segment generated 17%44% of the Company’s revenues, of which 61%75% was generated from overhaulsservice and service, 38% from direct parts sales and 1%25% from manufacturing. The results of the diesel enginedistribution and services segment are largely influenced by the economic cycles of the marine and power generation markets and the land-based oilfield service and oil and gas operator and producer markets, marine, power generation, on-highway and other industrial markets.


Diesel engineDistribution and services revenues for 20162019 decreased 38%16% when compared to 2018 and operating income decreased 83%48% when compared with 2015.2018. The lower revenues in 2016 compared to 2015 weredecrease was primarily attributable to reduced activity in the lackoilfield as a result of demand for the manufactureoil price volatility in late 2018 and early 2019, an oversupply of pressure pumping unitsequipment in North America, and otherreduced spending and enhanced cash flow discipline for the Company’s major oilfield customers.  During the first half of 2019, although oilfield activity levels and new orders for the Company’s oilfield related products and services declined as compared to the same period in 2018, the segment benefited from a significant backlog of manufacturing orders for new and remanufactured pressure pumping equipment received in the 2018 third and fourth quarters.  Most of these orders were completed in the 2019 first and second quarters as oilfield activity levels further declined for many of the Company’s customers.  As a result, customer demand and incremental orders for new and remanufactured pressure pumping equipment declined significantly for the duration of 2019, and sales of new and overhauled transmissions and related parts and service were minimal during the 2019 third and fourth quarters.  For 2019, the oil and gas market represented approximately 53% of distribution and services revenues.

The commercial and industrial market, which contributed 47% of distribution and services revenues for 2019, saw increased service levels and new engine sales in the marine repair business for much of the year, although activity levels in the inland market declined during the 2019 third quarter as many customers reduced maintenance activities following months of river flooding conditions and during the summer harvest season.  The commercial and industrial market also experienced increased demand for power generation equipment and forcompared to 2018, including the sale and distributioninstallation of engines, transmissions and parts due to the impact of the declinesignificant back-up power systems for major data centers in the price2019 first and second quarters.  Activity levels for the Company’s specialty rental units, back-up power systems, and refrigeration equipment seasonally increased in anticipation of crude oil and decreased drilling activity in North American shale formations. During the 2016 thirdas a result of summer storms and fourth quarters, with the increasewarm weather conditions in the price of crude oil2019 second and resulting increase in drilling activity, the segment saw an increase in activity for the remanufacturing and servicing of pressure pumping units. The marine diesel engine services market was impacted by continued weaknessthird quarters.  Demand in the Gulf of Mexico oilfield services market. In addition, customers continued to defer major maintenance projects in many regions of the marine diesel engine services market largely due to the weaker liquid and dry cargo barge markets and, to a lesser extent, the general economy. Thenuclear power generation market was stable benefiting from major generator set upgrades and parts sales for both domestic and international power generation customers. The diesel engine services results for 2016 and 2015 included $1,436,000 and $1,813,000, respectively, of severance charges in responsecompared to the reduced activity in both the marine and land-based markets.2018.
37


The diesel enginedistribution and services operating margin for 20162019 was 1.1%5.4% compared with 3.9%8.7% for 2015. The operating margin for 2016 reflected continued weakness in the land-based market, the Gulf of Mexico marine oilfield services market and customer deferrals of major maintenance projects throughout the marine diesel engine services market.2018.


Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures


The Company continued to generate favorable operating cash flow during 20162019 with net cash provided by operating activities of $414,038,000$511,813,000 compared with $521,305,000$346,999,000 of net cash provided by operating activities for 2015.2018, a 47% increase. The 21% decreaseimprovement was primarily from a $85,166,000 decreasedriven by increased revenues and operating income in net earnings,the marine transportation segment driven by the Higman acquisition in February 2018, the Targa acquisition in May 2018, the CGBM acquisition in December 2018, and the Cenac acquisition in March 2019, as well as improved coastal barge utilization and improved inland and coastal pricing. The improvement was also due to a net decrease of $12,452,000increase in cash flows from changesthe change in operating assets and liabilities of $153,953,000, primarily due to a $11,459,000 decrease in inventories reflecting reduced business activity levels in the provision for deferred income taxesdistribution and a $2,257,000services segment in 2019 compared to an increase in 2018. The inventory decrease in 2019 was primarily due to reduced business activity levels in the amortization of major maintenance costs, partially offset by a $8,677,000 increaseoil and gas market as compared to higher inventory levels in depreciation and amortization expense.2018 required to support higher business activity levels. In addition, during the 20162019 and 2015,2018, the Company generated cash of $321,000$57,657,000 and $3,712,000,$53,392,000, respectively, from proceeds from the disposition of assets, and $5,743,000 and $13,264,000, respectively, from proceeds from the exercise of stock options and $18,617,000 and $24,429,000, respectively,options.

38




For 2016,2019, cash generated and borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility were used for capital expenditures of $231,066,000,$248,164,000, including $10,676,000$22,008,000 for inland tank barge and towboat construction, $14,884,000 in final costs for the construction of two 185,000 barrel coastal ATBs, one placed in service in late 2015 and the second in June 2016, $74,689,000$18,433,000 for progress payments on the construction of two 155,000 barrel coastal ATBs, one placed in service in November 2016 and the second scheduled to be placed in service in the summer of 2017, $10,098,000 for progress payments on the construction of two 4900 horsepower coastal tugboats, $6,593,000 for progress payments on the construction of a 35,000 barrel coastal petrochemical tank barge placed in service in December 2016, $18,000 for progress payments on sixthree 5000 horsepower coastal ATB tugboats, $114,108,000$2,294,000 for final costs on a 155,000 barrel coastal ATB under construction purchased from another operator that was delivered to the Company in the 2018 fourth quarter, and $205,429,000 primarily for upgrading existing marine equipment and marine transportation and diesel enginedistribution and services facilities, and $137,072,000facilities. The Company also used $262,491,000 for acquisitions of businesses and marine equipment.  Cash generated and borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility in 2016 were also used for the repurchase of 35,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $1,827,000 and the acquisitions of noncontrolling interests for $8,438,000.


The Company’s debt-to-capitalization ratio decreased to 23.1%28.9% at December 31, 20162019 from 25.4%30.5% at December 31, 2015. The decrease was2018, primarily due to a decrease of $52,047,000 in outstanding debt and the increase in total equity from net earnings attributable to Kirby for 20162019 of $141,406,000 and$142,347,000, the exercise of stock options, the amortization of unearned equity compensation, partially offset by the acquisitions of noncontrolling interests of $8,460,000 and treasury stock purchases of $1,827,000.reduced borrowings. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company had $225,986,000no borrowings outstanding under its revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility, $375,000,000 outstanding under the Term Loan, $500,000,000 of Senior Notes Series A and Series B, and $500,000,000 of senior notes outstanding.under the 2028 Notes (each debt agreement as defined under “Long-Term Financing” below) outstanding, offset by $7,899,000 in unamortized debt discount and issuance costs (of which $2,650,000 attributable to the Revolving Credit Facility is included in other assets on the balance sheet at December 31, 2019).


During 2016,2019, the Company took delivery of five newacquired 63 inland tank barges from Cenac with a total capacity of approximately 141,0001,833,000 barrels, acquired 27retired 17 inland tank barges, from Seacor with a total capacity of approximately 807,000 barrels, transferred one tank barge into the inland fleet from the coastal fleet with a capacity of 31,000 barrels, added one leasedsold six inland tank barge with a capacity of 11,000 barrels, returned six leasedbarges, brought back into service eight inland tank barges, and retired 50chartered two inland tank barges, reducingdecreasing its capacity by approximately 1,038,000271,000 barrels. The net result was a reductionan increase of 2250 inland tank barges and approximately 48,0001,562,000 barrels of capacity during 2016.2019.


The Company projects that capital expenditures for 20172020 will be in the $165,000,000$155,000,000 to $185,000,000$175,000,000 range. The 20172020 construction program will consist of two inland tank barges with a total capacity of 57,000 barrels, one inland towboat,$25,000,000 to $30,000,000 in progress payments on the construction of a 155,000 barrel coastal ATB scheduledsix inland towboats to be placed in service in the summer of 2017, progress payments on the construction of two 4900 horsepower coastal tugboats and six 5000 horsepower coastal ATB tugboats and final costs on the construction of a 35,000 barrel coastal petrochemical tank barge placed in service in December 2016. Based on current commitments, steel prices and projected delivery schedules, the Company’s 2017 payments on new inland tank barges and the towboat will be approximately $3,000,000, 2017 progress payments on the construction of the 155,000 barrel coastal ATB will be approximately $7,000,000, 2017 progress payments on the construction of the two 4900 horsepower coastal tugboats will be approximately $16,000,000, progress payments on the six 5000 horsepower coastal ATB tugboats will be approximately $27,000,000 and final costs on the construction of the 35,000 barrel coastal petrochemical tank barge will be approximately $2,000,000. The balance of approximately2020.  Approximately $110,000,000 to $130,000,000$120,000,000 is primarily capital upgrades and improvements to existing marine equipment and marine transportationfacilities. The balance of $20,000,000 to $25,000,000 will be for new machinery and diesel engineequipment, facilities improvements and information technology projects in the distribution and services facilities.segment and corporate.
38


Outlook


Reduced crude oil volumes to be moved by tank barge due to additional pipelines, coupled with the large number of tank barges built during the last several years, many of which were for the movement of crude oil and natural gas condensate, has resulted in excess industry-wide tank barge capacity and lower equipment utilization for both the inland and coastal marine transportation markets. This extra capacity has placed inland and coastal tank barge rates under some pressure. As a result, the inland market for 2017 will be impacted by the pricing declines experienced throughout 2016.  However, with anticipated utilization in the mid 80% to low 90% levels for 2017, the industry could achieve a supply and demand balance during 2017, leading to modestly improving pricing in the second half of the year.  In addition, future inland tank barge demand for petrochemical and refined petroleum products volumes from increased production from current facilities, plant expansions or the opening of new facilities should benefit the inland marine transportation markets.

Inmarket, the coastal marine transportationCompany anticipates favorable market a declinedynamics with continued growth in crude oilcustomer demand during 2020, driven by continued growth in U.S. GDP and natural gas condensate transportation volumes has increased available capacity and has resultedgrowth in some reluctance among certain customerspetrochemicals as new plants come on-line. These factors, combined with only modest inland barge additions, are expected to extend term contracts, which has led to an increaseresult in inland barge utilization rates in the numberlow to mid-90% range during the year. Together with a full year of coastal vesselscontribution from the acquisition in March 2019 of Cenac’s fleet and anticipated contributions from the acquisition of Savage Inland Marine, LLC (“Savage”), inland revenues and operating in the spot market. In addition, the Company and the industry have added new coastal tank barge capacityincome are expected to increase during 2015 and 2016, with additional new capacity coming on-line in 2017 and 2018. While much of this new capacity is replacement capacity for older vessels anticipated to be retired, the Company maintains a cautious outlook as the industry absorbs the new capacity. For 2017, the Company expects tank barge utilization for the coastal markets to be in the high 70% to low 80% range.2020.


As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company estimated there were approximately 3,850 inland tank barges in the industry fleet, of which approximately 600350 were over 30 years old and approximately 270240 of those over 40 years old. Given the age profile of the industry inland tank barge fleet and current market conditions, the expectation is that many older tank barges will be removed from service during 2017. The Company estimates that approximately 100130 tank barges were ordered during 2015 and 20162019 for delivery throughout 2016, of which five were for the Company, significantly less than the 260 new inland tank barges placed in service during 2015, 36 of which were for the Company.  The Company estimates that approximately 40 tank barges were ordered during 2016 for delivery throughout 2017, two of which are for the Company,2020 and many older tank barges, including an expected 36four by the Company, will be retired, dependent on 20172020 market conditions. Historically, 75 to 150 older inland tank barges are retired from service each year industry-wide, with the extent of the retirements dependent on petrochemical and refinery production levels, and crude oil and natural gas condensate movements, both of which can have a direct effect on industry-wide tank barge utilization, as well as term and spot contract rates.


In the coastal marine transportation market, the Company expects revenues and operating income to be flat to slightly up compared to 2019, with coastal tank barge utilization in the mid-to high 80% range for 2020 driven by strong customer demand and tight industry capacity. Improving market conditions are expected to be driven by improving customer demand and expected additional industry retirements of aging barges due to BWMS regulations. During 2020, the Company expects to retire four aging coastal ATBs, three of which are large capacity vessels that would have required uneconomic BWMS at their next shipyard date. These retirements are expected to have a negative impact on coastal revenue and operating income during 2020. The Company also expects volumes in its coal transportation business to decline compared to 2019.

39



As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company estimated there were approximately 295280 tank barges operating in the 195,000 barrel or less coastal industry fleet, the sector of the market in which the Company operates, and approximately 3520 of those were over 3025 years old. In 2014 and 2015, the Company placed orders for the construction of two 185,000 barrel coastal ATBs, one of which was placed in service in late 2015 and the second in June 2016, two 155,000 barrel coastal ATBs, one of which was placed in service in November 2016 and the other scheduled for delivery in the summer of 2017, one 35,000 barrel coastal petrochemical tank barge placed in service in December 2016 and two 4900 horsepower coastal tugboats.  In addition, the Company placed an order in 2016 for the construction of six 5000 horsepower coastal ATB tugboats for delivery in 2017 and 2018. The Company is aware of eight coastal tank barges placed in service in 2016 by competitors and 11two announced coastal tank barge and tugboat units in the 195,000 barrel or less category under construction by competitors for delivery in 20172020 and 2018.2021.

39

Inthe distribution and services segment are largely influenced by the economic cycles of the land-based diesel engine services segment,oilfield service and oil and gas operator and producer markets, marine, power generation, on-highway and other industrial markets.

Recent oilfield activity declines and crude oil price volatility have created some uncertainty for the Company is experiencing a healthy reboundCompany’s oil and gas market and are expected to result in service demand, particularly with pressure pumping unit remanufacturing.  The United States land rig count has improved from the lowslower sales of 2016, oil prices have recently traded at a consistent level in the mid-$50 per barrel range, and service intensity in the well completion business has increased.  The condition of the industry’s pressure pumping fleet is poor.  Based on these positive conditions, the Company anticipates that for 2017 the demand for pressure pumping unit remanufacturing will remain strong and that a small number of orders for new pressure pumping equipment, maintenance on existing pressure pumping units, transmission overhauls, and ancillary oilfield service supportparts sales.  Based on current activity levels, orders and deliveries of new pressure pumping equipment willare expected to remain low throughout 2020, and maintenance activities are expected to be received.minimal. Transmission overhauls and parts sales are also expected to decline compared to 2019, but increase relative to 2019 fourth quarter levels as the year progresses. As a result, revenues and operating income for the Company’s oil and gas market are expected to decline in 2020 as compared to 2019.


For the marine diesel enginedistribution and services commercial and industrial market, the Company anticipates continued weaknessrevenues and operating income in the Gulf of Mexico oilfield services market throughout 2017,2020 to be higher compared to 2019 with the other marine markets to remain relatively consistent with 2016. The Company does anticipate some modest benefit from the VPS acquisition madegrowth in on-highway and industrial markets. Activity in the 2016 fourth quarter. The power generation market should remainand the commercial marine markets are expected to be stable benefiting from engine-generator set upgrades and parts sales for both domestic and international customers.in 2020.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis based on a combination of historical information and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the particular circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates based on different assumptions or conditions. The Company believes the critical accounting policies that most impact the consolidated financial statements are described below. It is also suggested that the Company’s significant accounting policies, as described in the Company’s financial statements in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, be read in conjunction with this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.


Accounts Receivable. The Company extends credit to its customers in the normal course of business. The Company regularly reviews its accounts and estimates the amount of uncollectible receivables each period and establishes an allowance for uncollectible amounts. The amount of the allowance is based on the age of unpaid amounts, information about the current financial strength of customers, and other relevant information. Estimates of uncollectible amounts are revised each period, and changes are recorded in the period they become known. Historically, credit risk with respect to these trade receivables has generally been considered minimal because of the financial strength of the Company’s customers; however, a United States or global recession or other adverse economic condition could impact the collectability of certain customers’ trade receivables which could have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations.


40



Property, Maintenance and Repairs. Property is recorded at cost. Improvements and betterments are capitalized as incurred. Depreciation is recorded on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the individual assets. When property items are retired, sold or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts with any gain or loss on the disposition included in the statement of earnings. Maintenance and repairs on vessels built for use on the inland waterways are charged to operating expense as incurred and includes the costs incurred in USCG inspections unless the shipyard extends the life or improves the operating capacity of the vessel which results in the costs being capitalized. The Company’s ocean-going vessels are subject to regulatory drydocking requirements after certain periods of time to be inspected, have planned major maintenance performed and be recertified by the ABS. These recertifications generally occur twice in a five year period. The Company defers the drydocking expenditures incurred on its ocean-going vessels due to regulatory marine inspections by the ABS and amortizes the costs of the shipyard over the period between drydockings, generally 30 or 60 months, depending on the type of major maintenance performed. Drydocking expenditures that extend the life or improve the operating capability of the vessel result in the costs being capitalized. Routine repairs and maintenance on ocean-going vessels are expensed as incurred. Interest is capitalized on the construction of new ocean-going vessels.
40


The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment by vessel class whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to future net cash expected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. There are many assumptions and estimates underlying the determination of an impairment event or loss, if any. The assumptions and estimates include, but are not limited to, estimated fair market value of the assets and estimated future cash flows expected to be generated by these assets, which are based on additional assumptions such as asset utilization, length of service the asset will be used, and estimated salvage values. Although the Company believes its assumptions and estimates are reasonable, deviations from the assumptions and estimates could produce a materially different result.


Goodwill. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in transactions accounted for as a purchase is included in goodwill. Management monitors the recoverability of goodwill on an annual basis, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that interim impairment testing is necessary. The amount of goodwill impairment, if any, is typically measured based on projected discounted future operating cash flows using an appropriate discount rate. The assessment of the recoverability of goodwill will be impacted if estimated future operating cash flows are not achieved. There are many assumptions and estimates underlying the determination of an impairment event or loss, if any. Although the Company believes its assumptions and estimates are reasonable, deviations from the assumptions and estimates could produce a materially different result.


Accrued Insurance. The Company is subject to property damage and casualty risks associated with operating vessels carrying large volumes of bulk liquid and dry cargo in a marine environment. The Company maintains insurance coverage against these risks subject to a deductible, below which the Company is liable. In addition to expensing claims below the deductible amount as incurred, the Company also maintains a reserve for losses that may have occurred but have not been reported to the Company, or are not yet fully developed. The Company uses historic experience and actuarial analysis by outside consultants to estimate an appropriate level of reserves. If the actual number of claims and magnitude were substantially greater than assumed, the required level of reserves for claims incurred but not reported or fully developed could be materially understated. The Company records receivables from its insurers for incurred claims above the Company’s deductible. If the solvency of the insurers became impaired, there could be an adverse impact on the accrued receivables and the availability of insurance.


Acquisitions


On October 11, 2016,January 29, 2020, the Company purchasedsigned a definitive agreement to acquire the inland tank barge fleet of Savage for approximately $278,000,000 in cash, subject to certain closing adjustments.  Savage’s tank barge fleet consists of 90 inland tank barges with approximately 2.5 million barrels of capacity and 46 inland towboats. Savage primarily moves petrochemicals, refined products, and crude oil on the Mississippi River, its tributaries, and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Savage also operates a significant ship bunkering business as well as barge fleeting services along the Gulf Coast. The closing of the acquisition is expected to occur late in the first quarter of 2020 and is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. The purchase will be financed through additional borrowings.

41



On January 3, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all the assets of VPSConvoy Servicing Company and Agility Fleet Services, LLC (collectively “Convoy”) for $11,440,000approximately $40,000,000 in cash. The assets purchased are mainly related to the EMD engine supplycash, before post-closing adjustments.  Convoy is an authorized dealer for Thermo King refrigeration systems for trucks, railroad cars and repair business of VPSother land transportation markets for North and include an EMD distributor agreement to sell enginesEast Texas as well as in nine western states.Colorado. Financing of the acquisition was through borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility.Revolving Credit Facility.


On June 30, 2016,During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company purchased, from various counterparties, a barge fleeting operation in Lake Charles, Louisiana and nine inland tank barges from leasing companies for an 80,000 barrel coastal tank barge from TD Equipment Finance, Inc. (“TD Equipment”) for $13,682,000aggregate of $17,991,000 in cash. The Company had been leasing the barge from TD Equipmentbarges prior to the purchases. Financing of these acquisitions was through borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility.

On March 14, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of the marine transportation fleet of Cenac for $244,500,000 in cash. Cenac’s fleet consisted of 63 inland 30,000 barrel tank barges with approximately 1,833,000 barrels of capacity, 34 inland towboats and two offshore tugboats. Cenac transported petrochemicals, refined products and black oil, including crude oil, residual fuels, feedstocks and lubricants on the lower Mississippi River, its tributaries, and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway for major oil companies and refiners. The average age of the inland tank barges was approximately five years and the inland towboats had an average age of approximately seven years.  Financing of the acquisition was through borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility.
On December 28, 2018, the Company purchased three inland tank barges from a leasing company for $3,120,000 in cash.  The Company had been leasing the barges prior to the purchase. Financing of the equipment acquisition was through borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility.Revolving Credit Facility.
41


On June 2, 2016,December 14, 2018, the Company purchased four coastal tugboats27 inland tank barges with a barrel capacity of 306,000 barrels from Crosby Marine Transportation LLCCGBM for $26,450,000$28,500,000 in cash.  The four coastal tugboats have an27 tank barges transport petrochemicals and refined products on the Mississippi River System and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway.  The average age of 13the barges was eight years.  Financing of the equipment acquisition was through borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility.Revolving Credit Facility.

On April 15, 2016,November 30, 2018, the Company purchased an inland towboat from a leasing company for $3,050,000 in cash. The Company had been leasing the towboat prior to the purchase.  Financing of the equipment acquisition was through borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility.
On May 10, 2018, the Company completed the purchase of Targa’s inland tank barge business from a subsidiary of Targa for $69,250,000 in cash. Targa’s inland tank barge fleet consisted of Seacor from subsidiaries of Seacor for16 pressure barges with a total valuecapacity of $89,181,000.258,000 barrels, many of which were under multi-year contracts that the Company assumed from Targa. The assets purchased consisted of 27 inland 30,000 barrel16 tank barges and 14 inland towboats. The purchase price was comprised of $85,500,000 in cash and the transfer to Seacor of a Florida-based ship docking tugboat with a value of $3,681,000.  The average age of the 27 inland tank barges was ten years. Seacor, through its subsidiary, SCF Waxler Marine LLC, transported refined petroleum products,transport petrochemicals and black oil on the Mississippi River System and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway.  Financing of the business acquisition was through borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility.
On March 15, 2018, the Company purchased two inland pressure tank barges from a competitor for $10,400,000 in cash. The average age of the two tank barges was five years.  Financing of the equipment acquisition was through borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility.

On February 14, 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of Higman for $421,922,000 in cash. Higman’s fleet consisted of 163 inland tank barges with 4.8 million barrels of capacity, and 75 inland towboats, transporting petrochemicals, black oil, including crude oil and natural gas condensate, and refined petroleum products on the Mississippi River System and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The average age of the inland tank barges was approximately seven years and the inland towboats had an average age of approximately eight years. Financing of the acquisition was through the issuance of the 2028 Notes. The 2028 Notes were issued on February 12, 2018 in preparation for closing of the acquisition.

42



On October 20, 2017, San Jac, a subsidiary of the Company, purchased certain assets of Sneed Shipbuilding, Inc. for $14,852,000 in cash including its Channelview, Texas shipyard. San Jac is a builder of marine vessels for both inland and offshore applications and a provider of repair and maintenance services. The Company intends to build towboats at the shipyard and use the facilities for routine maintenance. Financing of the acquisition was through borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility.Revolving Credit Facility.


On September 13, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of S&S, a global manufacturer and distributor of products and services for the oil and gas, marine, construction, power generation, transportation, mining and agricultural industries. The acquired business, which the Company operates through a newly formed subsidiary renamed Stewart & Stevenson LLC after the closing of the acquisition, was founded in 1902 and serves domestic and global markets with equipment, rental solutions, parts and service through a strategic network of sales and service centers in domestic and international locations.
The total value of the transaction was $758,213,000 consisting of cash consideration of $377,935,000, the assumption of $13,724,000 of debt and $366,554,000 through the issuance of 5,696,259 shares of Company common stock valued at $64.35 per share, the Company’s closing share price on September 13, 2017.  The debt assumed consisted of $12,135,000 of term debt and $1,589,000 of short-term secured loans related to the Company’s South American operations. The term debt was paid off without penalty in the 2017 fourth quarter. Financing of the acquisition was through a combination of the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility and the issuance of Company common stock.
S&S is a distributor in certain geographic areas for Allison Transmission, MTU, Detroit Diesel, EMD, Deutz and several other manufacturers. S&S’ principal customers are oilfield service companies, oil and gas operators and producers, and companies in the marine, mining, power generation, on-highway and other commercial and industrial applications.
On July 10, 2017, the Company completed the purchase of certain inland marine assets from an undisclosed competitor for $68,000,000 in cash. The assets purchased consisted of nine specialty pressure tank barges, four 30,000 barrel tank barges and three 1320 horsepower inland towboats. The average age of the 13 inland tank barges was five years. The 13 tank barges transport petrochemicals and refined petroleum products on the Mississippi River System and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Financing of the equipment acquisition was through borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility.
During July 2017, the Company purchased four inland tank barges for $1,450,000, as well as a barge fleeting and marine fueling operation business in Freeport, Texas for $3,900,000. The Company had been leasing the barges prior to the purchase. Financing of the acquisitions was through the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility.
Results of Operations

The Company reported 20162019 net earnings attributable to Kirby of $141,406,000,$142,347,000, or $2.62$2.37 per share, on revenues of $1,770,673,000,$2,838,399,000, compared with 20152018 net earnings attributable to Kirby of $226,684,000,$78,452,000, or $4.11$1.31 per share, on revenues of $2,147,532,000,$2,970,697,000, and 20142017 net earnings attributable to Kirby of $282,006,000,$313,187,000, or $4.93$5.62 per share, on revenues of $2,566,318,000.$2,214,418,000.

Marine transportation revenues for 20162019 were $1,471,893,000,$1,587,082,000, or 83%56% of total revenues, compared with $1,663,090,000,$1,483,143,000, or 77%50% of total revenues for 2015,2018, and $1,770,684,000,$1,324,106,000, or 69%60% of total revenues for 2014. Diesel engine2017. Distribution and services revenues for 20162019 were $298,780,000,$1,251,317,000, or 17%44% of total revenues, compared with $484,442,000,$1,487,554,000, or 23%50% of total revenues for 2015,2018, and $795,634,000,$890,312,000, or 31%40% of total revenues for 2014.2017.

In lightThe 2019 fourth quarter included $35,525,000 before taxes, $27,978,000 after taxes, or $0.47 per share, non-cash inventory write-downs and $4,757,000 before taxes, $3,747,000 after taxes, or $0.06 per share, severance and early retirement expense.

43



The 2018 fourth quarter included in$85,108,000 before taxes, $67,235,000 after taxes, or $1.12 per share, non-cash impairment of long-lived assets and lease cancellation costs and $2,702,000 before taxes, $2,135,000 after taxes, or $0.04 per share, non-cash impairment of goodwill.  The 2018 second quarter included a one-time non-deductible expense of $18,057,000, or $0.30 per share, related to the 2016retirement of Joseph H. Pyne as executive Chairman of the Board of Directors, effective April 30, 2018. The 2018 first quarter results was $5,605,000included $3,261,000 before taxes, or $.06$0.04 per share, of one-time transaction costs associated with the Higman acquisition, as well as $2,912,000 before taxes, or $0.04 per share, of severance chargesand retirement expenses, primarily related to cost reduction initiatives in the coastal marine transportation market and the integration of Higman.
The 2017 year included $269,472,000 after taxes, or $4.83 per share, of deferred tax benefit, the result of recent federal tax reform legislation that resulted in the remeasurement of the Company’s United States deferred tax assets and liabilities. This was partially offset by $105,712,000 before taxes, $66,975,000 after taxes, or $1.20 per share, non-cash impairment of long-lived assets and $5,449,000 before taxes, $3,389,000 after taxes, or $0.06 per share, charge for severance and early workforce retirements.
The 2017 results reflect the acquisition of S&S on September 13, 2017.  The 2017 results were negatively impacted by S&S acquisition related costs of $2,119,000, or $0.02 per share. The 2017 third quarter also included an estimated net $0.03 per share negative impact of Hurricane Harvey, which were reflectedmade landfall along the Texas Gulf Coast in late August 2017, impacting the marine transportation and diesel engine businessesdistribution and corporate staff in order to reduce costs. The 2015 firstservices operations, and third quarters included $1,225,000Hurricane Irma, which disrupted the coastal marine transportation and $702,000, respectively, of severance charges which were mainly reflected indistribution and services operations along the diesel engine services results. Also, the 2015 first quarter results included a gain of $1,621,000 before taxes, or $.02 per share, on the sale of the assets of a small product line in the diesel engine services segment.East Coast.

Marine Transportation


The Company, through its marine transportation segment, is a provider of marine transportation services, operating tank barges and towing vessels transporting bulk liquid products throughout the Mississippi River System, on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, coastwise along all three United States coasts, and in Alaska and Hawaii. The Company transports petrochemicals, black oil, refined petroleum products and agricultural chemicals by tank barge. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company operated 8761,053 inland tank barges, including 3424 leased barges, with a total capacity of 17.923.4 million barrels. This compares with 8981,003 inland tank barges operated as of December 31, 2015,2018, including 31 leased barges, with a total capacity of 17.921.8 million barrels. The Company operated an average of 234299 inland towboats during 2016,2019, of which an average of 7375 were chartered, compared with 248278 during 2015,2018, of which an average of 8477 were chartered.

The Company’s coastal tank barge fleet as of December 31, 20162019 consisted of 6949 tank barges, including seventwo of which were leased, with 6.24.7 million barrels of capacity, and 7547 coastal tugboats, eightfive of which were chartered. This compares with 7053 coastal tank barges operated as of December 31, 2015, eight2018, four of which were leased, with 6.05.1 million barrels of capacity, and 7350 coastal tugboats, sixfour of which were chartered. As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, the Company operated sixowned four offshore dry-bulk cargo barge and tugboat units engaged in the offshore transportation of dry-bulk cargoes.  The Company also owns a shifting operationoperations and fleeting facilityfacilities for dry cargo barges and tank barges on the Houston Ship Channel and in Freeport, Texas, a shipyard for building towboats and performing routine maintenance near the Houston Ship Channel, as well as a two-thirds interest in Osprey, which transports project cargoes and cargo containers by barge.

42
44



The following table sets forth the Company’s marine transportation segment’s revenues, costs and expenses, operating income and operating margins for the three years ended December 31, 20162019 (dollars in thousands):


 2016  2015  
% Change
2015 to
2016
  2014  
% Change
2014 to
2015
  2019  2018  
% Change
2018 to
2019
  2017  
% Change
2017 to
2018
 
Marine transportation revenues $1,471,893  $1,663,090   (11)% $1,770,684   (6)% $1,587,082  $1,483,143   7% $1,324,106   12%
                                        
Costs and expenses:                                        
Costs of sales and operating expenses  900,766   981,525   (8)  1,053,390   (7)  1,034,758   997,979   4   867,069   15 
Selling, general and administrative  108,917   112,193   (3)  119,087   (6)  122,202   122,421      116,827   5 
Taxes, other than on income  20,817   18,732   11   14,324   31   34,538   33,020   5   25,765   28 
Depreciation and amortization  184,291   175,798   5   154,019   14   179,742   182,307   (1)  178,898   2 
  1,214,791   1,288,248   (6)  1,340,820   (4)  1,371,240   1,335,727   3   1,188,559   12 
Operating income $257,102  $374,842   (31)% $429,864   (13)% $215,842  $147,416   46% $135,547   9%
Operating margins  17.5%  22.5%      24.3%      13.6%  9.9%      10.2%    


The following table shows the marine transportation markets serviced by the Company, the marine transportation revenue distribution for 2016,2019, products moved and the drivers of the demand for the products the Company transports:


Markets Serviced 
20162019
Revenue
Distribution
 Products Moved Drivers
Petrochemicals 49%54% Benzene, Styrene, Methanol, Acrylonitrile, Xylene, Naphtha, Caustic Soda, Butadiene, Propylene 
Consumer non-durables —70%
— 70% Consumer durables — 30%
       
Black Oil 25%23% Residual Fuel Oil, Coker Feedstock, Vacuum Gas Oil, Asphalt, Carbon Black Feedstock, Crude Oil, Natural Gas Condensate, Ship Bunkers Fuel for Power Plants and Ships, Feedstock for Refineries, Road Construction
       
Refined Petroleum Products 23%19% Gasoline, No. 2 Oil, Jet Fuel, Heating Oil, Diesel Fuel, Ethanol Vehicle Usage, Air Travel, Weather Conditions, Refinery Utilization
       
Agricultural Chemicals 3%4% Anhydrous Ammonia, Nitrogen-Based Liquid Fertilizer, Industrial Ammonia Corn, Cotton and Wheat Production, Chemical Feedstock Usage
 
2019 Compared with 2018
43
Marine Transportation Revenues
Marine transportation revenues for 2019 increased 7% when compared with 2018.  The increase was primarily due to the addition of the Higman fleet acquired on February 14, 2018, the Targa pressure barge fleet acquired on May 10, 2018, the CGBM inland tank barges acquired on December 14, 2018, and the Cenac fleet acquired on March 14, 2019, as well as improved barge utilization in the coastal market and higher spot and term contract pricing in the inland and coastal markets. Partially offsetting the increase were unusually poor operating conditions due to heavy fog along the Gulf Coast, prolonged periods of ice on the Illinois River, high water on the Mississippi River System, closures of key waterways as a result of lock maintenance projects, extended delays in the Houston Ship Channel, and increased shipyard days on several large capacity coastal vessels during the 2019 first and fourth quarters.  For 2019 and 2018, the inland tank barge fleet contributed 77% and 76%, respectively, and the coastal fleet 23% and 24%, respectively, of marine transportation revenues. The Cenac fleet was quickly integrated into the Company’s own fleet and the Cenac equipment began to operate on the Company’s contracts soon after the acquisition and Cenac barges worked with the Company’s towboats and vice versa resulting in differences in vessel utilization and pricing among individual assets and the consolidated fleet. Due to this quick integration, it is not practical to provide a specific amount of revenues for Cenac but the acquisition in March 2019 was one of the factors that drove increases in marine transportation revenues in 2019 as compared to 2018.

45

2016 Compared with 2015


Marine Transportation Revenues

Marine transportation revenues for 2016 decreased 11% compared with 2015, primarily due to lowerTank barge utilization levels in the Company’s inland marine transportation term and spot contract pricing, lower inland and coastal equipment utilization, a 24% decline inmarkets averaged the average cost of marine diesel fuel which is largely passed through to the customer, and an increase in the number of coastal vessels operating in the spot market which led to increased idle time and decreased revenues, partially offset by the addition of the Seacor tank barges acquired in April 2016. For 2016 and 2015, the inland tank barge fleet contributed 67% and 68%, respectively, and the coastal fleet contributed 33% and 32%, respectively, of marine transportation revenues.

Inland marine transportation equipment utilization declined to the high 80% range at the end of 2016, occasionally declining to the low-to-mid 80%mid-90% range during the year,2019 first and second quarters and low 90% range during the 2019 third and fourth quarters. Strong demand from petrochemicals, black oil, refined petroleum products and agricultural chemicals customers, along with extensive delay days due to poor operating conditions which slowed the transport of customer cargoes, contributed to increased utilization during the 2019 first and second quarters.  Better weather during the 2019 third quarter and receding flood waters on the Mississippi River System resulted in fewer delay days and contributed to modestly lower utilization during the 2019 third quarter. In the 2019 fourth quarter, weather conditions seasonally deteriorated, however, reduced refinery and chemical plant utilization for many of the Company’s major customers resulted in tank barge utilization remaining in the low 90% to 95% range atfor the beginning of 2016 and throughout 2015.  quarter.
Coastal tank barge utilization levels also declined throughout 2016, from the high 80% to low 90% rangeaveraged in the first quarter to the low 80% levelrange during the 2019 first quarter and mid-80% range during the 2019 second, third and fourth quarters.  The improvement in utilization in 2019 primarily reflected improved customer demand resulting in higher utilization of spot market capacity.  Utilization in the fourth quarter.  Coastal utilization levels were generallycoastal marine fleet continued to be impacted by the oversupply of smaller tank barges in the 90% to 95% range throughout the majority of 2015.coastal industry.


The petrochemical market, the Company’s largest market, contributed 49%54% of marine transportation revenues for 2016,2019, reflecting continued stable volumes from Gulf Coast petrochemical plants for both domestic consumption and to terminals for export destinations, aside from the negative impactaddition of plant maintenance turnarounds. Also, demand for movements of certain upriver petrochemicals was strongthe Targa pressure barge fleet in the 2016 second half.May 2018. Low priced domestic natural gas, a basic feedstock for the United States petrochemical industry, provides the industry with a competitive advantage relative to naphtha-based foreign petrochemical producers.  In addition, favorable commodity prices and the addition of new petrochemical industry capacity in 2018 and 2019 benefited the market.

The black oil market, which contributed 25%23% of marine transportation revenues for 2016,2019, reflected lower fleet utilizationstrong demand from steady refinery production levels and the export of refined petroleum products and fuel oils. The Company continued to transport crude oil and natural gas condensate produced from the Eagle Ford and Permian Basin shale formations in Texas, both along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway with inland vessels and in the Gulf of Mexico with coastal vessels. Additionally, the Company transported increased volumes of Utica natural gas condensate downriver from the Mid-Atlantic to the Gulf Coast and Canadian and Bakken crude downriver from the Midwest to the Gulf Coast.
The refined petroleum products market, which contributed 19% of marine transportation revenues for 2019, reflected increased volumes in the inland market, due in part to the acquisition of Cenac, and stable volumes in coastal.
The agricultural chemical market, which contributed 4% of marine transportation revenues for 2019, saw typical seasonal demand for transportation of both domestically produced and imported products during 2019.
For 2019, the inland operations incurred 13,259 delay days, 32% more than the 10,046 delay days that occurred during 2018. Delay days measure the lost time incurred by a tow (towboat and one or more tank barges) during transit when the tow is stopped due to weather, lock conditions or other navigational factors. The increase in delay days reflected unusually poor operating conditions during 2019 due to heavy fog along the Gulf Coast, extended periods of ice on the Illinois River, near record high water conditions on the Mississippi River System, closures of key waterways as a result of lock maintenance projects and extended delays in the Houston Ship Channel.  Flood waters on the Mississippi River System receded in the beginning of August 2019.
During 2019 and 2018, approximately 65% of marine transportation inland revenues were under term contracts and 35% were spot contract revenues.  Inland time charters, which insulate the Company from revenue fluctuations caused by weather and navigational delays and temporary market declines, represented 62% of inland revenues under term contracts during 2019 compared with 59% during 2018.

46



Rates on inland term contracts renewed in the 2019 first quarter increased in the 4% to 6% average range compared with term contracts renewed in the 2018 first quarter. Rates on inland term contracts renewed in the 2019 second quarter increased in the 5% to 8% average range compared with term contracts renewed in the 2018 second quarter. Rates on inland term contracts renewed in the 2019 third quarter increased in the 3% to 4% average range compared with term contracts renewed in the 2018 third quarter.  Rates on inland term contracts renewed in the 2019 fourth quarter increased in the 2% to 4% average range compared with term contracts renewed in the 2018 fourth quarter.  Spot contract rates, which include the cost of fuel, increased approximately 20% in the 2019 first quarter compared with the 2018 first quarter.  In both the 2019 second and third quarters, spot contract rates increased approximately 15% compared with the 2018 second and third quarters.  In the 2019 fourth quarter, spot contract rates increased approximately 5% compared with the 2018 fourth quarter.  Effective January 1, 2019, annual escalators for labor and the producer price index on a number of inland multi-year contracts resulted in rate increases on those contracts of approximately 1.7%, excluding fuel.
During 2019 and 2018, approximately 80% of the coastal revenues were under term contracts and 20% were spot contract revenues. Coastal time charters which insulate the Company from revenue fluctuations caused by weather and navigational delays and temporary market declines, represented approximately 85% of coastal revenues under term contracts during 2019 and 2018.  Spot and term contract pricing in the coastal market are contingent on various factors including geographic location, vessel capacity, vessel type and product serviced.  Spot market rates in the 2019 first and second quarters increased in the 10% to 15% average range compared to the 2018 first and second quarters.  In the 2019 third quarter, spot market rates increased approximately 20% compared to the 2018 third quarter.  In the 2019 fourth quarter, spot market rates increased approximately 10% compared to the 2018 fourth quarter.  Rates on coastal term contracts renewed in each of the 2019 first, second, and third quarters increased in the 4% to 6% average range compared with term contracts renewed in the 2018 first, second, and third quarters.  Rates on coastal term contracts renewed in the 2019 fourth quarter increased in the 5% to 15% average range compared with term contracts renewed in the 2018 fourth quarter.
Marine Transportation Costs and Expenses
Costs and expenses for 2019 increased 3% when compared with 2018. Costs of sales and operating expenses for 2019 increased 4% compared with 2018, primarily due to the addition of the Higman fleet in February 2018 and the Cenac fleet in March 2019, partially offset by lower fuel costs.
The inland marine transportation fleet operated an average of 299 towboats during 2019, of which an average of 75 were chartered, compared with 278 during 2018, of which an average of 77 were chartered. The increase was primarily due to the addition of inland towboats with the Cenac acquisition on March 14, 2019.  Generally, as demand, or anticipated demand, increases or decreases, as new tank barges are added to the fleet, as chartered towboat availability changes, or as weather or water conditions dictate, the Company charters in or releases chartered towboats in an effort to balance horsepower needs with current requirements. The Company has historically used chartered towboats for approximately one-fourth of its horsepower requirements.
During 2019, the inland operations consumed 50.0 million gallons of diesel fuel compared to 49.3 million gallons consumed during 2018. The average price per gallon of diesel fuel consumed during 2019 was $2.06 per gallon compared with $2.20 per gallon for 2018. Fuel escalation and de-escalation clauses on term contracts are designed to rebate fuel costs when prices decline and recover additional fuel costs when fuel prices rise; however, there is generally a 30 to 90 day delay before the contracts are adjusted. Spot contracts do not have escalators for fuel.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2019 was consistent with 2018.  The 2019 fourth quarter included $1,447,000 related to severance and early retirement expense.  The 2019 year also included costs due to Cenac acquisition related costs of $442,000 and salaries as well as the related costs of personnel acquired in the Higman acquisition. In 2018, there were transaction costs of $3,261,000, consisting primarily of legal, audit and other professional fees associated with the Higman acquisition and severance charges of $2,591,000 associated with the integration of Higman into the Company and further reduction in headcount in the coastal sector in order to manage costs, both of which were incurred in the 2018 first quarter.

47



Taxes, other than on income for 2019 increased 5% compared with 2018, mainly due to higher property taxes on marine transportation equipment, including the Higman, Targa, CGBM, and Cenac fleets.
Marine Transportation Operating Income and Operating Margins
Marine transportation operating income for 2019 increased 46% compared with 2018. The operating margin was 13.6% for 2019 compared with 9.9% for 2018.  The operating income increase in 2019 compared to 2018 was primarily due to the acquisitions of Higman, Targa’s pressure barge fleet, CGBM’s inland tank barges, and Cenac’s fleet as well as improved barge utilization in the coastal market and higher spot and term contract pricing in the inland and coastal markets, partially offset by significant weather and navigational challenges in 2019.

2018 Compared with 2017
Marine Transportation Revenues
Marine transportation revenues for 2018 increased 12% when compared with 2017 primarily due to the addition of the Higman inland tank barges acquired on February 14, 2018 and the Targa pressure barge fleet acquired on May 10, 2018, and improved barge utilization and spot contract pricing in the inland market. Partially offsetting the increase were lower term and spot contract pricing in the coastal market, poor seasonal weather conditions in the first four months and fourth quarter of 2018, lock closures in the 2018 second half and fewer coastal tank barges available with the retirement of 12 tank barges in the 2017 fourth quarter. Demand in the coastal markets continued to be impacted by the oversupply of tank barges in the coastal industry. For 2018 and 2017, the inland tank barge fleet contributed 76% and 70%, respectively, and the coastal fleet 24% and 30%, respectively, of marine transportation revenues. The Higman fleet was quickly integrated into the Company’s own fleet. The Higman equipment began to operate on the Company’s contracts soon after the acquisition and Higman barges worked with the Company’s towboats and vice versa resulting in differences in vessel utilization and pricing among individual assets and the consolidated fleet. Due to this quick integration, it is not practical to provide a specific amount of revenues for Higman but the acquisition in February 2018 was one of the primary factors that drove increases in marine transportation revenues in 2018 as compared to 2017.

Tank barge utilization levels in the Company’s inland marine transportation markets were in the mid-90% range during the 2018 first quarter, high 80% to low 90% during the second quarter, and the low to mid-90% range during the third and fourth quarters. Increased customer demand and poor seasonal operating conditions contributed to a tight market across the entire inland tank barge industry during 2018. Operating conditions were adversely impacted by high water conditions on the Mississippi River early in the 2018 second quarter, however, weather conditions improved in May and June, enhancing operating efficiency but driving seasonally lower utilization compared to the 2018 first quarter.  Increasing volumes from petrochemical and black oil customers, lock infrastructure projects in Louisiana as well as on the Ohio River, and refinery turnarounds contributed to increased utilization during the 2018 second half compared to the 2018 first half.
Coastal tank barge utilization levels improved throughout 2018 from the high 70% range during the 2018 first quarter to the 80% range by end of 2018.  The improvement in utilization primarily reflected the retirement of 12 out-of-service coastal barges during the 2017 fourth quarter.
The petrochemical market, the Company’s largest market, contributed 56% of marine transportation revenues for 2018, reflecting continued stable volumes from Gulf Coast petrochemical plants for both domestic consumption and to terminals for export destinations, the addition of the Targa pressure barge fleet in May 2018 and the addition of inland tank barges acquired in July 2017 from an undisclosed competitor. Low priced domestic natural gas, a basic feedstock for the United States petrochemical industry, provides the industry with a competitive advantage relative to naphtha-based foreign petrochemical producers.  In addition, favorable commodity price volatility. During 2016,prices and the addition of new petrochemical industry capacity in 2017 and 2018 benefited the market.

48



The black oil market, which contributed 21% of marine transportation revenues for 2018, reflected higher revenues in the inland market primarily due to the addition of the Higman fleet. The Company continued to transport crude oil and natural gas condensate produced from the Eagle Ford and Permian Basin shale formations in Texas both along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway with inland vessels and in the Gulf of Mexico with coastal equipment, and continued to transport Utica natural gas condensate downriver from the Mid-Atlantic to the Gulf Coast, however, at reduced levelsCoast. Revenues for the transportation of black oil products in the coastal market during 2018 were lower compared with 2015.2017 due to the continued industry-wide over supply of tank barges in the coastal industry.

The refined petroleum products market, which contributed 23%19% of marine transportation revenues for 2016,2018, reflected increasedstronger volumes in the inland market as a resultprimarily due to the addition of the Seacor acquisition in April 2016,Higman fleet, partially offset by soft demandlower utilization in the coastal market, primarily a result of weak heating oil demand in the 2016 first quarter and the movementoversupply of vessels to the spot market at lower rates with increased idle time.coastal tank barge capacity.

The agricultural chemicalschemical market, which contributed 3%4% of marine transportation revenues for 2016,2018, saw typical seasonal demand for transportation of both domestically produced and imported products during the first, third and fourth quarters and a decline in demand in the second quarter, primarily due to a shortened spring season.2018.

For 2016,2018, the inland operations incurred 7,27810,046 delay days, 8% less33% more than the 7,9247,577 delay days that occurred during 2015.2017. Delay days measure the lost time incurred by a tow (towboat and one or more tank barges) during transit when the tow is stopped due to weather, lock conditions or other navigational factors. OperatingThe increase in delay days reflected the lock infrastructure projects in the 2018 third quarter and the challenging operating conditions duringin the 20162018 first quarter were challenging due to periodic high wind and heavy fog along the Gulf Coast.  Additionally, high water on the Mississippi River System led to tow size restrictions and added horsepower requirements, as well as slower transit times for most of the 2016 first quarter.  During the 2016 second quarter, operating conditions were seasonally normal, although high cross currents at floodgates and river crossings on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway led to congestion and added delays at certain points along the Gulf Coast.  During the 2016 third quarter, operating conditions were seasonally normal, although there was significant flooding in Louisiana that caused some disruptions in the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway for a short period.  During the 2016 fourth quarter, dense fog and high winds along the Gulf Coast created operating challenges and ice on the Illinois River, presented some short-term challenges for upriver transit timesinfrastructure issues on the Ohio River, seasonal fog and efficiency.high winds, as well as lock delays along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. High water conditions on the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers in the first four months of 2018 also increased delay days.

During the first nine months2018, approximately 65% of 2016 and all of 2015, approximately 80% of the inland marine transportation inland revenues were under term contracts and 20%35% were spot contract revenues. During the 2016 fourth quarter,For 2017, approximately 75% of inland marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 25% were spot contract revenues. These allocations provide the operations with a more predictable revenue stream. Inland time charters, which insulate the Company from revenue fluctuations caused by weather and navigational delaysdelay and temporary market declines, represented 52%59% of the inland revenues under term contracts during 20162018 compared with 55% during 2015.49% for 2017.
44


During 20162018 and the 2015 third and fourth quarters,2017, approximately 80% of the coastal marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 20% were spot contract revenues.  During the 2015 first and second quarters, approximately 85% of the coastal marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 15% were spot contract revenues.  The decrease in term contract revenues in 2016 and the 2015 third and fourth quarters reflected the continued trend of non-renewal of certain term contracts which put increased equipment in the spot contract market, leading to increased idle time. However, the coastal revenues reflected the new 185,000 barrel ATB placed in service in the 2015 fourth quarter under a long-term contract. The second new 185,000 barrel ATB was placed in service in June 2016, also under a long-term contract. Coastal time charters, which insulate the Company from revenue fluctuations caused by weather and navigational delays and temporary market declines, represented approximately 85% of the coastal revenues under term contracts in 2016 as compared to 90% in 2015.2018 and 2017.

Rates on inland term contracts renewed in 2016the 2018 first quarter decreased in the 5%4% to 9%6% average range compared with term contracts renewed in 2015.the first quarter of 2017. Rates on inland term contracts renewed in the 2018 second quarter increased in the 1% to 3% average range compared with term contracts renewed in the second quarter of 2017. In the 2018 third quarter, rates on inland term contracts renewed increased in the 3% to 5% average range compared with term contracts renewed in the third quarter of 2017. In the 2018 fourth quarter, rates on inland term contracts were generally higher in the 1% to 3% average range, though some multi-year contracts did renew lower, compared with term contracts renewed in the fourth quarter of 2017.  Spot contract rates, which include the cost of fuel, were relatively flatincreased in the 201610% to 15% range in the 2018 first quarter whenand second quarters compared with the 20152017 first and second quarters. In the 2018 third and fourth quarterquarters, spot contract rates increased in the 20% to 25% range compared with the 2017 third and at or below term contract pricing during the balance of 2016.fourth quarters.  Effective January 1, 2016,2018, annual escalators for labor and the producer price index on a number of inland multi-year contracts resulted in rate increases on those contracts of approximately 1.5%1.0%, excluding fuel.

Rates onDuring 2018 and 2017, approximately 80% of the coastal revenues were under term contracts renewed in 2016and 20% were essentially flat whenspot contract revenues. Coastal time charters represented approximately 85% of coastal revenues under term contracts during 2018 and 2017.  Spot and term contract pricing, which are contingent on various factors including geographic location, vessel capacity, vessel type and product serviced, were stable throughout the 2018 first and second quarters compared with term contracts renewedpricing in 2015. Spot contract rates remained above term contract rates during the 2016 first quarter, fluctuated around term contract rates during the 2016 second2017 fourth quarter, and fell below term contract rates duringmoved modestly higher in the 20162018 third and fourth quarters. In the 2018 first and second quarters, both term and spot contract pricing declined in the 10% to 15% range compared to the 2017 first and second quarters.  Compared to the 2017 third quarter, spot market pricing in the 2018 third quarter was similar but term contract pricing increased modestly.  Compared to the 2017 fourth quarter, spot market pricing in the 2018 fourth quarter was approximately 10% higher and term contract pricing increased modestly.


49



Marine Transportation Costs and Expenses

Costs and expenses for 2016 decreased 6%2018 increased 12% when compared with 2015.2017. Costs of sales and operating expenses for 2016 decreased 8%2018 increased 15% compared with 2015,2017, primarily reflecting lower business activity levels, lower fuel costs due to the declineaddition of the Higman fleet of inland tank barges and towboats in the price of dieselFebruary 2018 and higher fuel and fewer inland towboats operated.costs.

The inland marine transportation fleet operated an average of 234278 towboats during 2016,2018, of which an average of 73 towboats77 were chartered, compared with 248224 during 2015,2017, of which an average of 84 towboats70 were chartered. AsThe increase was primarily due to the addition of inland towboats with the Higman acquisition on February 14, 2018. Generally, as demand, or anticipated demand, increases or decreases, as new tank barges are added to the fleet, as chartered towboat availability changes, or as weather or water conditions dictate, such as the heavy ice and high water conditions that occurred in the 2016 first and fourth quarters, the Company charters-incharters in or releases chartered towboats in an effort to balance horsepower needs with current requirements. The Company has historically used chartered towboats for approximately one-third of its horsepower requirements.

During 2016,2018, the inland operations consumed 40.049.3 million gallons of diesel fuel compared to 42.940.4 million gallons consumed during 2015.2017, driven by the Higman acquisition. The average price per gallon of diesel fuel consumed during 20162018 was $1.46$2.20 per gallon compared with $1.92$1.79 per gallon for 2015.2017. Fuel escalation and de-escalation clauses on term contracts are designed to rebate fuel costs when prices decline and recover additional fuel costs when fuel prices rise; however, there is generally a 30 to 90 day delay before the contracts are adjusted. Spot contracts do not have escalators for fuel.

Taxes, other than on income, for 2016 increased 11% compared with 2015. The increase is mainly due to higher property taxes on marine transportation equipment.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2016 decreased 3% compared with 2015, primarily a reflection of a $3,792,000 severance charge in the 2016 first quarter and the resulting cost savings in the 2016 second, third and fourth quarters, partially offset by salary increases effective August 1, 2016.
45

Depreciation and amortization for 2016 increased 5% compared with 2015.  The increases were primarily attributable to the Seacor acquisition and increased capital expenditures in both the inland and coastal fleets, including new inland tank barges and towboats, as well as a coastal 185,000 barrel ATB placed in service in the fourth quarter of 2015 and a second coastal 185,000 barrel ATB placed in service in the second quarter of 2016.

Marine Transportation Operating Income and Operating Margins

Marine transportation operating income for 2016 decreased 31% compared with 2015. The operating margin for 2016 was 17.5% compared with 22.5% for 2015. The results primarily reflected lower inland marine transportation term and spot contract pricing, lower coastal spot contract pricing, lower inland utilization levels, an increase in the number of coastal vessels operating in the spot market which led to increased idle time and voyage costs, higher depreciation expense and the 2016 first quarter severance charge of $3,792,000, partially offset by savings from a reduction in force in early 2016 and during 2015, and a reduction in the average number of inland towboats operated.

2015 Compared with 2014

Marine Transportation Revenues

Marine transportation revenues for 2015 decreased 6% when compared with 2014 primarily due to a 37% decline in the average cost of marine diesel fuel in 2015, which is largely passed through to the customer. Also, a heavier coastal marine shipyard schedule, slightly lower inland and coastal tank barge utilization in the later part of 2015, and lower inland marine transportation term and spot contract rates contributed to the year over year decline in revenues. For 2015 and 2014, the inland tank barge fleet contributed 68% and the coastal fleet contributed 32% of marine transportation revenues.  The Company’s inland and coastal petrochemical, black oil and refined petroleum products fleets achieved relatively consistent tank barge utilization in the 90% to 95% range throughout the majority of 2015, consistent with 2014, and occasionally declined to the high-80% level during the 2015 fourth quarter.

The petrochemical market, the Company’s largest market, contributed 47% of marine transportation revenues for 2015, reflecting continued stable volumes from Gulf Coast petrochemical plants for both domestic consumption and to terminals for export destinations. Low priced domestic natural gas, a basic feedstock for the United States petrochemical industry, has provided the industry with a competitive advantage relative to foreign petrochemical producers.

The black oil market, which contributed 30% of marine transportation revenues for 2015, reflected continued stable demand driven by high refinery production levels and the export of refined petroleum products and fuel oils. Demand for crude oil and natural gas condensate movements declined during 2015; however, the Company was successful in moving barges from that trade to other markets. The Company continued to transport crude oil and natural gas condensate produced from the Eagle Ford and Permian Basin shale formations in Texas both along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway with inland vessels and in the Gulf of Mexico with coastal equipment, and continued to transport Utica crude oil and natural gas condensate downriver from the Mid-Atlantic to the Gulf Coast, however at reduced levels compared with 2014.

The refined petroleum products market, which contributed 20% of marine transportation revenues for 2015, reflected continued stable demand, driven by high refinery production levels, for the movement of products in the inland and coastal markets. The refined petroleum products market was also driven by a cold winter in the Northeast that increased the demand for heating oil during the 2015 first quarter and by additional vehicle miles driven during 2015.

The agricultural chemical market, which contributed 3% of marine transportation revenues for 2015, saw typical seasonal demand for transportation of both domestically produced and imported products during 2015.
46

For 2015, the inland operations incurred 7,924 delay days, 2% more than the 7,804 delay days that occurred during 2014. Delay days measure the lost time incurred by a tow (towboat and one or more tank barges) during transit when the tow is stopped due to weather, lock conditions or other navigational factors. Operating conditions were challenging during the 2015 third and fourth quarters due to scheduled lock closures along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and high water conditions. Operating conditions were also challenging during the 2015 second and fourth quarters due to high water conditions and lock closures on the Mississippi River System, as well as strong currents at river crossings along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway.

During 2015 and 2014, approximately 80% of the inland marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 20% were spot contract revenues, thereby providing the operations with a more predictable revenue stream. Inland time charters, which insulate the Company from revenue fluctuations caused by weather and navigational delays and temporary market declines, represented 55% of the inland revenues under term contracts during 2015 compared with 56% during 2014.

During 2015, approximately 80% of the coastal marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 20% were under spot contracts. During 2014, 85% of coastal marine transportation revenues were under term contracts and 15% were under spot contracts.  Coastal time charters, which insulate the Company from revenue fluctuations caused by weather and navigational delays and temporary market declines, represented approximately 90% of the coastal revenues under term contracts during 2015 and 2014.

Rates on inland term contracts renewed in the 2015 first quarter were flat or down slightly compared with term contracts in the first quarter of 2014, while rates for the balance of 2015 decreased in the 1% to 5% average range compared with the corresponding 2014 period.  Spot contract rates, which include the cost of fuel, remained at or above term contract pricing for the majority of 2015 until the fourth quarter when spot contract pricing was at or below term contract pricing.  Effective January 1, 2015, annual escalators for labor and the producer price index on a number of inland multi-year contracts resulted in rate increases on those contracts of approximately 1.5%, excluding fuel.

Rates on coastal term contracts renewed increased in the 2015 first quarter in the 6% to 8% average range, second quarter in the 4% to 6% average range, third quarter in the 2% to 4% average range, and in the fourth quarter were flat to up slightly compared with corresponding 2014 quarters.  Spot contract rates, which include the cost of fuel, remained above term contract rates during 2015.

Marine Transportation Costs and Expenses

Costs and expenses for 2015 decreased 4% compared with 2014. Costs of sales and operating expenses for 2015 decreased 7% compared with 2014, reflecting a 37% decline in the average cost of marine diesel fuel for 2015, which is largely passed through to the customer. This decrease was partially offset by higher operating labor costs due to vessel salary increases effective January 1, 2015, increased pension expense for inland marine vessel personnel resulting from actuarial changes to mortality tables and a lower discount rate, and higher shipyard activity in the coastal marine transportation market in the 2015 second and third quarters.

The inland marine transportation fleet operated an average of 248 towboats during 2015, of which an average of 84 towboats were chartered, compared with 251 during 2014, of which an average of 79 towboats were chartered. As demand, or anticipated demand, increases or decreases, as new tank barges are added to the fleet, as chartered towboat availability changes, or as weather or water conditions dictate, such as the heavy ice and high water conditions that occurred in the 2015 first and second quarters, and high water and scheduled lock closures along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in the 2015 third and fourth quarters, the Company charters-in or releases chartered towboats in an effort to balance horsepower needs with current requirements. The Company has historically used chartered towboats for approximately one-third of its horsepower requirements.

During 2015, the inland operations consumed 42.9 million gallons of diesel fuel compared to 44.7 million gallons consumed during 2014. The average price per gallon of diesel fuel consumed during 2015 was $1.92 compared with $3.06 for 2014. Fuel escalation and de-escalation clauses on term contracts are designed to rebate fuel costs when prices decline and recover additional fuel costs when fuel prices rise; however, there is generally a 30 to 90 day delay before the contracts are adjusted. Spot contracts do not have escalators for fuel.
 
47Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2018 increased 5% compared with 2017, primarily due to the addition of Higman personnel and related expenses plus higher incentive compensation accruals. The increase included $3,261,000 of transaction costs, consisting primarily of legal, audit and other professional fees associated with the Higman acquisition, severance charges of $2,591,000 associated with the integration of Higman into the Company and further reduction in headcount in the coastal sector in order to manage costs, and $2,378,000 of non-cash expenses related to the amendment of the employee stock award plan; all of which were incurred in the 2018 first quarter.


Taxes, other than on income for 20152018 increased 31%28% compared with 2014. The increase is2017, mainly due to higher property taxes on marine transportation equipment, including the Higman and an increase in the inland waterways user tax rate from 20Targa fleets, and higher waterway use taxes due to 29 cents per gallon of fuel consumed effective April 1, 2015. This user tax is largely passed throughhigher business activity levels, mainly due to the customer.Higman acquisition.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2015 decreased 6% compared with 2014, primarily a reflection of a $2,215,000 severance charge in the 2014 first quarter and lower professional fees in the 2015 first and second quarters, partially offset by salary increases effective April 1, 2015.

Depreciation and amortization for 2015 increased 14% compared with 2014.  The increase was primarily attributable to increased capital expenditures in both the inland and coastal fleets, including new inland tank barges and towboats, as well as six inland pressure tank barges purchased in February 2015. In addition, during the 2015 third and fourth quarters, the Company shortened the estimated useful lives of certain assets in the coastal fleet prior to their scheduled 2016 shipyards, resulting in an increase in depreciation expense.

Marine Transportation Operating Income and Operating Margins

Marine transportation operating income for 2015 decreased 13%2018 increased 9% compared with 2014.2017. The operating margin was 9.9% for 2015 was 22.5%2018 compared with 24.3%10.2% for 2014.2017. The results reflected continued stable demand acrossoperating income increase in 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily due to the majorityacquisitions of the Company’s inlandHigman and coastal markets, but 2015 was negatively impacted by lower inland marine transportationTarga’s pressure barge fleet, improved term and spot contract rates, the impact of fuel price adjustments on inland marine affreightment contracts, higher coastal marine transportation depreciation expense and amortization of major maintenance costspricing in the 2015 thirdinland market, and improved barge utilization in the inland market, partially offset by lower coastal term and spot contract pricing, poor seasonal weather conditions in the first four months and fourth quarters, higher shipyard activityquarter of 2018 and lock closures in the coastal marine transportation fleet in2018 second half.  Higman transaction costs, severance and retirement charges, and expenses related to the 2015 secondamendment of the employee stock award plan also negatively impacted the 2018 first quarter.

Distribution and third quarters, higher operating labor costs due to vessel salary increases effective January 1, 2015, and increased pension expense for inland marine vessel personnel resulting from actuarial changes to mortality tables and a lower discount rate.

Diesel Engine Services


The Company, through its diesel enginedistribution and services segment, sells genuine replacement parts, provides service mechanics to overhaul and repair medium-speed and high-speed diesel engines, transmissions, reduction gears pumps,and related oilfield services equipment, rebuilds component parts or entire diesel engines, transmissions and reduction gears, and related equipment used in oilfield services, marine, power generation, on-highway and other industrial applications. The Company also rents equipment including generators, industrial compressors, railcar movers, and high capacity lift trucks for use in a variety of industrial markets, and manufactures and remanufactures oilfield service equipment, including pressure pumping units. The Company primarily services the marine, power generation and theunits, for land-based oilfield service and oil and gas operator and producer markets.customers.

48
50



The following table sets forth the Company’s diesel enginedistribution and services segment’s revenues, costs and expenses, operating income and operating margins for the three years ended December 31, 20162019 (dollars in thousands):


 2016  2015  
% Change
2015 to
2016
   2014  
% Change
2014 to
2015
  2019  2018  
% Change
2018 to
2019
  2017  
% Change
2017 to
2018
 
Diesel engine services revenues $298,780  $484,442   (38)% $795,634   (39)%
Distribution and services revenues $1,251,317  $1,487,554   (16)% $890,312   67%
           `                             
Costs and expenses:                                         
Costs of sales and operating expenses  226,186   380,841   (41)   641,492   (41)  995,288   1,162,967   (14)  691,029   68 
Selling, general and administrative  54,714   70,267   (22)   80,309   (13)  145,473   149,756   (3)  89,060   68 
Taxes, other than on income  1,861   1,915   (3)   2,307   (17)  7,357   6,177   19   3,357   84 
Depreciation and amortization  12,833   12,498   3    11,463   9   35,998   39,349   (9)  20,387   93 
  295,594   465,521   (37)   735,571   (37)  1,184,116   1,358,249   (13)  803,833   69 
Operating income $3,186  $18,921   (83)% $60,063   (68)% $67,201  $129,305   (48)% $86,479   50%
Operating margins  1.1%  3.9%       7.5%      5.4%  8.7%      9.7%    


The following table shows the markets serviced by the Company, the revenue distribution for 2016,2019, and the customers for each market:


Markets Serviced 
20162019
Revenue
Distribution
 Customers
Land-BasedOil and Gas 48%53% Land-Based Oilfield Services, Oil and Gas Operators and Producers On-Highway Transportation
     
MarineCommercial and Industrial 36%47% Inland River Carriers — Dry and Liquid, Offshore Towing — Dry and Liquid, Offshore Oilfield Services — Drilling Rigs & Supply Boats, Harbor Towing, Dredging, Great Lakes Ore Carriers,
Pleasure Crafts, On and Off-Highway Transportation, Power Generation,16%Standby Power Generation, Pumping Stations


20162019 Compared with 20152018


Diesel EngineDistribution and Services Revenues


Diesel engineDistribution and services revenues for 20162019 decreased 38%16% when compared to 2018. The decrease was primarily attributable to reduced activity in the oilfield as a result of oil price volatility in late 2018 and early 2019, an oversupply of pressure pumping equipment in North America, and reduced spending and enhanced cash flow discipline for the Company’s major oilfield customers.  During the first half of 2019, although oilfield activity levels and new orders for the Company’s oilfield related products and services declined as compared to the same period in 2018, the segment benefited from a significant backlog of manufacturing orders for new and remanufactured pressure pumping equipment received in the 2018 third and fourth quarters.  Most of these orders were completed in the 2019 first and second quarters as oilfield activity levels further declined for many of the Company’s customers.  As a result, customer demand and incremental orders for new and remanufactured pressure pumping equipment declined significantly for the duration of 2019, and sales of new and overhauled transmissions and related parts and service were minimal during the 2019 third and fourth quarters.  For 2019, the oil and gas market represented approximately 53% of distribution and services revenues.

The commercial and industrial market, which contributed 47% of distribution and services revenues for 2019, saw increased service levels and new engine sales in the marine repair business for much of the year, although activity levels in the inland market declined during the 2019 third quarter as many customers reduced maintenance activities following months of river flooding conditions and during the summer harvest season.  The commercial and industrial market also experienced increased demand for power generation equipment compared to 2018, including the sale and installation of significant back-up power systems for major data centers in the 2019 first and second quarters.  Activity levels for the Company’s specialty rental units, back-up power systems, and refrigeration equipment seasonally increased in anticipation of and as a result of summer storms and warm weather conditions in the 2019 second and third quarters.  Demand in the nuclear power generation market was stable compared to 2018.

Distribution and Services Costs and Expenses

Costs and expenses for 2019 decreased 13%, compared with 2015,2018. Costs of sales and operating expenses for 2019 decreased 14% compared with 2018, reflecting lower demand for new and remanufactured pressure pumping equipment and reduced demand for new and overhauled transmissions and related parts and service in the oil and gas market.

51



Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2019 decreased 3%, compared with 2018, primarily due to lower incentive compensation and professional fees, partially offset by $3,310,000 related to severance and early retirement expense incurred in the lack2019 fourth quarter.

Depreciation and amortization expenses for 2019 decreased 9%, compared to 2018 primarily due to sales of distribution and services facilities resulting in lower depreciation.

Distribution and Services Operating Income and Operating Margins

Operating income for the distribution and services segment for 2019 decreased 48% compared to 2018. The operating margin for 2019 was 5.4% compared with 8.7% for 2018. The results primarily reflected decreased sales in higher margin oil and gas related revenue and increased sales of lower margin power generation equipment.

2018 Compared with 2017

Distribution and Services Revenues

Distribution and services revenues for 2018 increased 67% when compared with 2017. The higher revenues were primarily attributable to the acquisition of S&S, completed on September 13, 2017, as well as increased demand in the oil and gas market for the manufacturing of oilfield service equipment, including new pressure pumping units, the sale and distribution of engines and related parts, and improving market conditions in the commercial marine diesel engine repair business, partially offset by lower demand in the 2018 second half for new and overhauled transmissions and related parts and remanufactured pressure pumping units from some key oilfield customers.

For 2018, the oil and gas market contributed approximately 68% of the distribution and services revenues. The increased demand challenged the Company’s vendor supply chain in 2018 and created delays for the delivery of new engines, transmissions and parts required for the completion of both new and remanufactured oilfield service equipment, including pressure pumping units, and impacted the recognition of revenue. However, the supply chain issues were largely resolved during the 2018 fourth quarter resulting in a sequential increase in the number of new and remanufactured pressure pumping units delivered in the fourth quarter. In the commercial and industrial market, approximately 32% of the distribution and services revenues for 2018, the marine sector experienced higher service levels for diesel engine service and related parts sales throughout 2018. The power generation sector saw increased demand from commercial customers for specialty rental units and back-up power systems in the 2018 second and third quarters in anticipation of and as a result of summer storms. Demand for standby-by power generation equipment declined in the 2018 fourth quarter compared to the 2017 fourth quarter which had experienced higher levels of activity during the 2017 hurricane season. Demand in the nuclear power generation market was stable compared to 2017.

Distribution and Services Costs and Expenses

Costs and expenses for 2018 increased 69%, compared with 2017. Costs of sales and operating expenses for 2018 increased 68% compared with 2017, reflecting the acquisition of S&S on September 13, 2017, as well as increased demand for the manufactureremanufacture of pressure pumping units and othertransmission overhauls, improvement in the manufacturing of oilfield service equipment, including pressure pumping units, and an increase in demand for the sale and distribution of engines, transmissions and related parts due to the impact of the decline in the price of crude oil and decreased drilling activity in North American shale formations. During 2016 third and fourth quarters, with the increase in the price of crude oil and resulting increase in drilling activity, the segment saw an increase in activity for the remanufacturing and servicing of pressure pumping units. The marine diesel engine services market remained at lower activity levels, primarily due to continued weakness in the Gulf of Mexico oilfield servicesgas market. In addition, customers continued to defer major maintenance projects in many regions of the marine diesel engine services market largely due to the weaker barge market and, to a lesser extent, the general economy.  The power generation market was relatively stable during 2016, benefiting from major generator set upgrades and parts sales for both domestic and international power generation customers.

Diesel Engine Services Costs and Expenses

Costs and expenses for 2016 decreased 37% compared with 2016. Costs of sales and operating expenses for 2016 decreased 41% compared with 2015, reflecting a significant decrease in the number of pressure pumping units and other oilfield service equipment manufactured, a decline in the sale and service of land-based engines, transmissions and parts and continued weakness in the marine markets. The 2016 first quarter, the 2015 first quarter and the 2015 third quarter selling, general and administrative expenses included severance charges of $1,436,000, $1,111,000 and $702,000, respectively, in response to the reduced activity in both the marine and land-based markets.

49
52

Diesel Engine

Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2018 increased 68%, compared with 2017, primarily due to the S&S acquisition, as well as increased activity in the oil and gas market. The 2018 year included a $171,000 severance charge incurred in the 2018 first quarter associated with the integration of S&S into the Company and $1,168,000 of non-cash expenses, also incurred in the 2018 first quarter, related to the amendment of the employee stock award plan.

Distribution and Services Operating Income and Operating Margins


Operating income for 2016 decreased 83%the distribution and services segment for 2018 increased 50% compared with 2015.to 2017. The operating margin for 20162018 was 1.1%8.7% compared with 3.9%9.7% for 2015.2017. The results primarily reflected the earnings contribution of S&S and continued weakness in the land-based market, the Gulf of Mexico marine oilfield services market and customer deferrals of major maintenance projects throughout the marine diesel engine services market.

2015 Compared with 2014

Diesel Engine Services Revenues

Diesel engine services revenues for 2015 decreased 39% compared with 2014, primarily due to the lack ofstrong demand for the manufacture and remanufacture of pressure pumping units and othertransmission overhauls, the manufacturing of oilfield service equipment, in the land-based market and for decreased demand for service and distribution of parts, engines and transmissions due to impact of the decline in the price of crude oil and decreased drilling activity in North American shale formations. With the reduction in activity levels, oilfield service customers in the land-based market continued to delay new orders and postpone delivery of existing orders for new pressure pumping units and other oilfield service equipment. The marine diesel engine services market declined modestly, due primarily to weakness in the Gulf of Mexico oilfield services market. The power generation market was stable, benefiting from major generator set upgrades and parts sales for both domestic and international power generation customers.

Diesel Engine Services Costs and Expenses

Costs and expenses for 2015 decreased 37%, compared with 2014. Costs of sales and operating expenses for 2015 decreased 41% compared with 2014, reflecting a significant decrease in the number of pressure pumping units and other oilfield service equipment manufactured and remanufactured, and a decline in the sale and service of land-based engines,new transmissions and related parts. The 2015 first quarter reflected the completion of the manufacturing of pressure pumping units in backlog from 2014. Units carried over from 2014, which incurred delays and production issues, negatively impacted the profitability in the 2015 first quarter. The 2015 selling, general and administrative expenses included a $1,111,000 first quarter severance charge in response to the reduced activity in manufacturing in the land-based market and a $702,000 third quarter severance charge in response to reduced activity in the Gulf of Mexico oilfield services market.

Diesel Engine Services Operating Income and Operating Margins

Diesel engine services operating income for 2015 decreased 68% compared with 2014. The operating margin for 2015 was 3.9% compared with 7.5% for 2014. The results reflected weakness in the land-based market due to the negative impact of reduced oilfield service activity levels, production issues and weakness in the Gulf of Mexico oilfield services market, as well as the $1,111,000 first quarter 2015 and $702,000 third quarter 2015 severance charges.


General Corporate Expenses


General corporate expenses for 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 were $14,966,000, $14,773,000$13,643,000, $35,590,000 and $14,896,000,$18,202,000, respectively.  The increasegeneral corporate expenses for 2016 was 1%2018 are higher when compared to 2015.  The decrease for 2015 was less than 1% when comparedboth 2019 and 2017 primarily due to 2014.a one-time non-deductible expense of $18,057,000 in the 2018 second quarter related to the retirement of the Company’s executive Chairman, effective April 30, 2018, and higher incentive compensation accruals.
50


Gain (Loss) on Disposition of Assets


The Company reported a net gain on disposition of assets of $8,152,000 in 2019 compared to $1,968,000 in 2018 and a net loss on disposition of assets of $127,000$4,487,000 in 2016 compared with2017.  The net gains on disposition of assets of $1,672,000 in 20152019 and $781,000 in 2014. The net loss and gains2018 were predominantly from the salesales or retirementretirements of marine equipment and indistribution and services facilities.  The 2017 loss was primarily from the 2015 first quarter, theretirement and sale of older and less efficient inland towboats during the assets of a small diesel engine services product line.2017 fourth quarter.


Other Income and Expenses


The following table sets forth inventory write-down, impairment of long-lived assets, impairment of goodwill, lease cancellation costs, equity in earnings of affiliates, other expense,income, noncontrolling interests and interest expense for the three years ended December 31, 20162019 (dollars in thousands):


 2016  2015  
% Change
2015 to
2016
  2014  
% Change
2014 to
2015
  2019  2018  
% Change
2018 to
2019
  2017  
% Change
2017 to
2018
 
Inventory write-down $(35,525) $   N/A  $   %
Impairment of long-lived assets     (82,705)  (100)%  (105,712)  (22)%
Impairment of goodwill     (2,702)  (100)%     N/A 
Lease cancellation costs     (2,403)  (100)%     N/A 
Equity in earnings of affiliates $532  $451   18% $384   17%  379   355   7%  291   22%
Other expense  (291)  (663)  (56)%  (345)  92%
Other income  3,408   5,371   (37)%  570   842%
Noncontrolling interests  (1,398)  (1,286)  9%  (2,602)  (51)%  (672)  (626)  7%  (716)  (13)%
Interest expense  (17,690)  (18,738)  (6)%  (21,461)  (13)%  (55,994)  (46,856)  20%  (21,472)  118%


53



Inventory Write-down

During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company recorded a $35,525,000 non-cash pre-tax write-down of oilfield and pressure pumping related inventory in the distribution and services segment.  The after-tax effect of the charge was $27,978,000 or $0.47 per share.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded a $82,705,000 non-cash pre-tax impairment charge. The after-tax effect of the charge was $65,337,000 or $1.09 per share. The USCG adopted regulations on BWMS establishing a standard for the allowable concentration of living organisms in certain vessel ballast water discharged in waters of the United States under the National Invasive Species Act. The regulations include requirements for the installation of engineering equipment to treat ballast water by establishing an approval process for BWMS. The USCG has approved manufacturers’ systems that met the regulatory discharge standard equivalent to the International Maritime Organization’s D-2 standard. The phase-in schedule for those existing vessels requiring a system to install BWMS equipment is dependent on vessel build date, ballast water capacity, and drydock schedule. Compliance with the ballast water treatment regulations requires the installation of equipment on some of the Company’s vessels to treat ballast water before it is discharged. The installation of BWMS equipment will require significant capital expenditures at the next scheduled drydocking to complete the installation of the approved system on those existing vessels that require a system to comply with the BWMS regulations.

Due to the advanced age of four of the Company’s older ATBs and the high cost of installation of BWMS, the Company will retire the ATBs at their next scheduled shipyard dates which range between 2020 and 2023 instead of installing the expensive BWMS equipment required to operate the vessels past their next required shipyard dates. A pre-tax impairment charge of $78,835,000 was incurred in the fourth quarter of 2018 to reduce the ATBs to a fair value of $13,247,000 due to reduced estimated cash flows resulting from reduced lives on these four older ATBs. The reduced estimated useful lives are due to the assessment of the impact of the new regulations by USCG that require the installation of BWMS. The fair value of the four ATBs of $13,247,000 is presented in marine transportation equipment at December 31, 2018.

The impairment charge also included a pre-tax charge of $3,870,000 as the Company reduced the carrying value of its improvements in a leased barge to its scrap value of $220,000. As part of a lease termination, the Company agreed to terminate the lease, purchase the barge and then scrap the barge which resulted in the Company committing to put the barge up for sale in December 2018. The barge was scrapped in January 2019. The fair market value of the barge was $220,000 at December 31, 2018, and was presented in prepaid expenses and other current assets. In addition, the Company incurred $2,403,000 in lease cancellation costs in December 2018 related to the leased barge.

During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company recorded a $105,712,000 non-cash pre-tax impairment charge. The after-tax effect of the charge was $66,975,000 or $1.20 per share. The impairment charge was to reduce certain vessels to a fair value of $12,550,000 as the Company decided to put certain older out-of-service vessels up for sale in its marine transportation segment in response to lower equipment utilization, pricing pressure and expensive BWMS installations required in the next few years on some of the coastal tank barges. Retiring some of the older coastal marine vessels reduces the fleet’s age profile and improves the efficiency of the fleet. The fair market value of the vessels was $12,550,000 at December 31, 2017, and was presented in prepaid expenses and other current assets.

Impairment of Goodwill

During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company took a $2,702,000 charge for the impairment of the remaining goodwill recorded for Osprey. The impairment reflected the reduced profitability outlook of the container-on-barge operations due to the current economic environment.

54



Equity in Earnings of Affiliates


Equity in earnings of affiliates primarily consisted of the Company’s 50% ownership of a barge fleeting operation.


Noncontrolling InterestsOther Income


Noncontrolling interestsOther income for 2016 increased 9% compared with 20152019, 2018 and decreased 51%2017 includes income of $3,454,000, $4,517,000 and $621,000, respectively, for 2015 compared with 2014, primarily dueall components of net benefit costs except the service cost component related to lower business levels at the Company’s 51% owned shifting operation and fleeting facility for dry cargo barges and tank barges on the Houston Ship Channel with the Company acquiring the remaining 49% interest in December 2016.defined benefit plans.


Interest Expense


Interest expense for 2016 decreased 6%2019, 2018 and 2017 was $55,994,000, $46,856,000, and $21,472,000, respectively.  The increase in 2019 compared with 2015,to 2018 and 2017 was primarily due to lower average debt levels.  Interest expense for 2015 decreased 13% compared with 2014, primarily dueborrowings to lower interest ratesfinance the Higman acquisition in February 2018, the acquisition of Targa’s pressure barge fleet in May 2018, the purchase of the 155,000 barrel coastal ATB under construction in June 2018, the acquisition of CGBM’s tank barges in December 2018, and increased capitalized interest.the acquisition of Cenac’s fleet in March 2019.  During 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, the average debt and average interest rate (excluding capitalized interest expense) were $750,499,000$1,502,044,000 and 2.7%3.7%, $797,322,000$1,370,905,000 and 2.7%3.5%, and $682,616,000$774,058,000 and 3.2%3.0%, respectively. Interest expense for 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 excludes capitalized interest of $2,974,000, $3,026,000$1,003,000, $2,206,000 and $639,000,$1,731,000, respectively.

51
55



Financial Condition, Capital Resources and Liquidity


Balance Sheet


Total assets at December 31, 20162019 were $4,303,499,000$6,079,097,000 compared with $4,152,281,000$5,871,594,000 at December 31, 20152018 and $4,137,614,000$5,127,427,000 at December 31, 2014.2017. The December 31, 2019 total assets reflect the Cenac acquisition in March 2019 for $244,500,000. The December 31, 2018 total assets reflect the Higman acquisition in February 2018 for $421,922,000, the purchase of Targa’s inland tank barge business in May 2018 for $69,250,000 and the purchase in December 2018 of inland tank barges from CGBM for $28,500,000, all more fully described under Acquisitions above. The following table sets forth the significant components of the balance sheet as of December 31, 20162019 compared with 20152018 and 20152018 compared with 20142017 (dollars in thousands):


 2016  2015  
% Change
2015 to
2016
  2014  
% Change
2014 to
2015
  2019  2018  
% Change
2018 to
2019
  2017  
% Change
2017 to
2018
 
Assets:                              
Current assets $646,555  $640,776   1% $803,154   (20)% $917,579  $1,096,489   (16)% $957,082   15%
Property and equipment, net  2,921,374   2,778,980   5   2,589,498   7   3,777,110   3,539,802   7   2,959,265   20 
Operating lease right-of-use assets  159,641      N/A      N/A 
Investment in affiliates  2,622   2,090   25   2,539   (18)  2,025   2,495   (19)  1,890   32 
Goodwill  598,131   586,718   2   591,405   (1)  953,826   953,826      935,135   2 
Other intangibles, net  210,682   224,197   (6)  232,808   (4)
Other assets  134,817   143,717   (6)  151,018   (5)  58,234   54,785   6   41,247   33 
 $4,303,499  $4,152,281   4% $4,137,614   % $6,079,097  $5,871,594   4% $5,127,427   15%
                                        
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity:
                                        
Current liabilities $358,338  $361,917   (1)% $594,027   (39)% $514,115  $607,782   (15)% $480,306   27%
Long-term debt-less current portion  722,802   774,849   (7)  595,705   30 
Long-term debt, net — less current portion  1,369,751   1,410,169   (3)  992,403   42 
Deferred income taxes  719,057   669,808   7   595,769   12   588,204   542,785   8   468,451   16 
Operating lease liabilities  139,457      N/A      N/A 
Other long-term liabilities  90,435   66,511   36   87,200   (24)  95,978   94,557   2   72,044   31 
Total equity  2,412,867   2,279,196   6   2,264,913   1   3,371,592   3,216,301   5   3,114,223   3 
 $4,303,499  $4,152,281   4% $4,137,614   % $6,079,097  $5,871,594   4% $5,127,427   15%


20162019 Compared with 20152018


Current assets as of December 31, 2016 increased 1%2019 decreased 16% compared with December 31, 2015.2018. Trade accounts receivable increased 2% driven by slower collections at the Company’s marine transportation segment and several large projects billed late in 2016 fourth quarterdecreased 9% mainly due to decreased activities in the diesel enginedistribution and services segment.  Prepaid expensesoil and other assets increased 9% primarily due to an increase in prepaid fuel and prepaid insurance.  Other accounts receivable decreased 7%, primarily due to a decrease in income tax receivable for income taxes overpaid in the 2015 fourth quartergas market, partially offset by an increaseincreased activities in insurance claims receivables.the inland marine transportation market. Inventories, net, decreased 31%, primarily reflecting lower inventory levels due to reduced business activity levels in the oil and gas market and write-downs of oilfield and pressure pumping related inventory of $35,525,000.


Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, at December 31, 20162019 increased 7% compared with December 31, 2018. The increase reflected $234,289,000 of capital expenditures for 2019, more fully described under Capital Expenditures Reflected on the Balance Sheet below, the fair value of the property and equipment acquired in the Cenac acquisition of $247,122,000, and the nine inland tank barges purchased during 2019 for $13,040,000, less $204,592,000 of depreciation expense and $52,150,000 of property disposals during 2019.

Operating lease right-of-use assets increased due to the adoption of Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”) on January 1, 2019.

56



Other intangibles, net, as of December 31, 2019 decreased 6% compared with December 31, 2018, primarily due to amortization of intangibles other than goodwill.

Other assets at December 31, 2019 increased 6% compared with December 31, 2018 primarily due to the reclassification of unamortized debt issuance costs of $2,650,000 attributable to the Revolving Credit Facility to other assets.

Current liabilities as of December 31, 2019 decreased 15% compared with December 31, 2018. Accounts payable decreased 26%, primarily due to reduced business activity levels in the distribution and services oil and gas market. Accrued liabilities decreased 4% primarily due to lower accrued employee incentive compensation during 2019.  Current portion of operating lease liabilities increased due to the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019.  Deferred revenues decreased 46%, primarily reflecting reduced business activity levels in the distribution and services oil and gas market.

Long-term debt, net — less current portion, as of December 31, 2019 decreased 3% compared with December 31, 2018, primarily reflecting payments of $417,373,000 on the amended and restated Revolving Credit Facility offset by the addition of the five-year Term Loan on March 27, 2019 with $375,000,000 outstanding as of December 31, 2019. Net debt discount and deferred issuance costs were $7,899,000 (of which $2,650,000 attributable to the Revolving Credit Facility is included in other assets on the balance sheet) and $7,204,000 as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Deferred income taxes as of December 31, 2019 increased 8% compared with December 31, 2018, primarily reflecting the 2019 deferred tax provision of $46,839,000.

Operating lease liabilities increased due to the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019.

Other long-term liabilities as of December 31, 2019 increased 2% compared with December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily due to accrued pension liabilities, offset by a decrease due to the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019 and the resulting reclassification of unfavorable leases to operating lease right-of-use assets and the reclassification of deferred rent liabilities to long-term operating lease liabilities and contributions of $3,064,000 to the Higman pension plan during 2019.

Total equity as of December 31, 2019 increased 5% compared with December 31, 2015.2018. The increase was primarily the result of $142,347,000 of net earnings attributable to Kirby for 2019, and an increase in additional paid-in capital of $12,552,000, primarily due to employee stock awards.

2018 Compared with 2017

Current assets as of December 31, 2018 increased 15% compared with December 31, 2017. Inventories, net, increased 61%, primarily reflecting higher inventories, including work in process, in the distribution and services oil and gas market due to the adoption of ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”) and to meet current business activity levels. Prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased 5% primarily due the sale of marine vessels in 2018 that were classified as assets held for sale in the 2017 fourth quarter. Trade accounts receivable decreased 8%, primarily reflecting decreased business activity levels in the distribution and services oil and gas market and lower revenue recognized due to the adoption of ASU 2014-09.

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, at December 31, 2018 increased 20% compared with December 31, 2017. The increase reflected $233,103,000$318,302,000 of capital expenditures for 2016,2018, more fully described under Capital Expenditures Reflected on the Balance Sheet below, the fair value of the property and equipment acquired in acquisitions of $127,400,000,$585,155,000, less $192,450,000$208,212,000 of depreciation expense for 2016 and $22,871,000$46,083,000 of property disposals during 2016.2018. In addition, during 2018, the Company took an impairment charge, more fully described under Impairment of Long-lived Assets above, that reduced the carrying value of marine transportation equipment by $76,779,000.

Goodwill at December 31, 2016 increased 2% compared with December 31, 2015 mainly due to the purchases of the inland tank barge fleet of Seacor in April 2016 and VPS in October 2016.

Other assets at December 31, 2016 decreased 6% compared with December 31, 2015 primarily due to the amortization of intangibles other than goodwill and the amortization of major maintenance costs on ocean-going vessels, net of major maintenance drydock expenditures for 2016.  Partially offsetting the decrease was the addition of intangible assets as a result of the purchase of certain assets of VPS in October 2016.

52
57



Goodwill as of December 31, 2018 increased 2% compared with December 31, 2017, predominantly reflecting the goodwill recorded in the Higman and Targa acquisitions.

Other intangibles, net, as of December 31, 2018 decreased 4% compared with December 31, 2017, reflecting amortization of $19,613,000, partially offset by intangible assets other than goodwill recorded in the Targa acquisition.

Other assets at December 31, 2018 increased 33% compared with December 31, 2017 primarily due to the addition of deferred major maintenance drydock expenditures on ocean-going vessels, net of amortization.

Current liabilities as of December 31, 2016 decreased 1%2018 increased 27% compared with December 31, 2015. The decrease was2017. Accounts payable increased 25%, primarily due to a 28% decreaseincreased business activity levels in employee compensationthe distribution and services segment, the acquisition of Higman and higher shipyard accruals. Accrued liabilities increased 18% primarily due to lower employee incentive compensation accruals for 2016 and a 13% decrease in deferred revenues reflecting decreased advanced billingsaccrued liabilities assumed in the coastal marine transportation market and in the diesel engine services power generation market.   The decrease was partially offset byHigman acquisition including an increase of 14% in taxes other than on income, due to the timing ofprimarily waterway use taxes and property tax paymentstaxes, and an increase in employee incentive compensation. Deferred revenues increased 66%, primarily in the distribution and services segment, reflecting changes in revenue recognition with the adoption of 10% in accrued insurance premiums and claims.ASU 2014-09.


Long-term debt, less current portion, as of December 31, 2016 decreased 7%2018 increased 42% compared with December 31, 2015,2017, primarily reflecting netthe issuance on February 12, 2018 of $500,000,000 under the 2028 Notes to fund the acquisition of Higman, partially offset by payments of $52,848,000$78,455,000 on the revolving credit facilityfacilities during 2016.2018. Net debt discount and deferred debt issueissuance costs were $3,184,000$7,204,000 and $3,985,000$3,442,000 at December 31, 20162018 and 2015,December 31, 2017, respectively.


Deferred income taxes as of December 31, 20162018 increased 7%16% compared with December 31, 2015. The increase was2017, primarily due toreflecting $40,524,000 of deferred income taxes recorded with the 2016Higman acquisition and the 2018 deferred tax provision of $51,296,000, the result of bonus tax depreciation on qualifying expenditures due to the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act (“PATH”) of 2015. PATH continued the bonus tax percentage of 50% for qualifying expenditures placed in service in 2015 through 2017, but then phases down to 40% in 2018 and 30% in 2019.$34,881,000.


Other long-term liabilities as of December 31, 20162018 increased 36%31% compared with December 31, 2015.2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in$11,100,000 of intangible liabilities related to unfavorable contracts of the pension liability due to a lower discount rateHigman acquisition and no contribution to the pension plan in 2016.liability assumed with the Higman acquisition of $33,116,000, partially offset by contributions of $8,102,000 to the Higman pension plan during 2018.


Total equity as of December 31, 20162018 increased 6%3% compared with December 31, 2015.2017. The increase was primarily the result of $141,406,000$78,452,000 of net earnings attributable to Kirby for 20162018, an increase in additional paid-in capital of $20,386,000, primarily due to the employee stock award plan amendment which resulted in shorter expense accrual periods on stock options and RSUs granted after February 19, 2018 to employees who are nearing retirement and meet certain years of service and age requirements, a $7,746,000$6,432,000 decrease in treasury stock partially offset byand a $2,324,000$9,722,000 decrease in additional paid-in capital due to the exerciseopening balance of stock options at exercise prices belowretained earnings with the costadoption of treasury stock issued and the issuance of restricted stock below the cost of treasury stock issued, a $6,321,000 decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and a decrease in noncontrolling interests of $6,836,000.ASU 2014-09. The decrease in treasury stock was mainly due to the issuance of restricted stock and the exercise of stock options in connection with stock award plans, partially offset by purchases during 20162018 of $1,827,000$776,000 of the Company’s common stock.  The decrease in accumulated OCI primarily resulted from the increase in unrecognized losses related to the Company’s defined benefit plans and the decrease in noncontrolling interests was primarily due to the acquisition of the remaining interests in two partnerships in which the Company had the controlling interest.

2015 Compared with 2014

Current assets as of December 31, 2015 decreased 20% compared with December 31, 2014. Trade accounts receivable decreased 30%, primarily a reflection of the decrease in revenues in the 2015 fourth quarter compared to the 2014 fourth quarter. Inventory decreased 4% due to the sale of inventory purchased in 2014 for 2015 projects, the sale of a small diesel engine services product line in the 2015 first quarter and the sale of a diesel engine services compression systems business in the 2015 fourth quarter. This was partially offset by increases in the land-based inventory due to lower activity levels and parts ordered prior to customer order cancelations or delays.

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, at December 31, 2015 increased 7% compared with December 31, 2014. The increase reflected $343,269,000 of capital expenditures for 2015, more fully described under Capital Expenditures Reflected on the Balance Sheet below, and $41,250,000 for the purchase of six inland pressure tank barges in February 2015, less $183,714,000 of depreciation expense for 2015 and $10,430,000 of property disposals during 2015.

Goodwill at December 31, 2015 decreased 1% compared with December 31, 2014 mainly due to the sale of a diesel engine services compression systems business.
53

Other assets at December 31, 2015 decreased 5% compared with December 31, 2014 primarily due to the amortization of intangibles other than goodwill and the amortization of major maintenance costs on ocean-going vessels, net of major maintenance drydock expenditures for 2015.  Partially offsetting the decrease was a $3,780,000 long-term notes receivable from the sale of equipment in the marine transportation segment.

Current liabilities as of December 31, 2015 decreased 39% compared with December 31, 2014. The decrease in the current portion of long-term debt at December 31, 2015 reflected the reclassification of the balance of the revolving credit facility as long-term debt as the Company extended the maturity date of its revolving credit agreement to April 30, 2020. Accounts payable decreased 40%, primarily due to decreased business activity levels in the land-based diesel engine services market. Accrued liabilities decreased 8%, primarily from lower employee incentive compensation accruals for 2015 and payments on insurance claims. Deferred revenues decreased 19%, primarily reflecting decreased business activity levels in the land-based diesel engine services market.

Long-term debt, less current portion, as of December 31, 2015 increased 30% compared with December 31, 2014, reflecting net borrowings of $62,134,000 on the revolving credit facility during 2015 and the reclassification of the current portion of the revolving credit facility to long-term debt, as the revolving credit facility was refinanced on April 30, 2015. The borrowings on the revolving credit facility were used primarily to finance treasury stock purchases of $241,105,000, to purchase six inland pressure tank barges for $41,250,000 in February 2015 and to refinance the $100,000,000 outstanding under the Company’s term loan agreement on April 30, 2015.

Deferred income taxes as of December 31, 2015 increased 12% compared with December 31, 2014. The increase was primarily due to the 2015 deferred tax provision of $62,755,000, the result of bonus tax depreciation on qualifying expenditures due to PATH.

Other long-term liabilities as of December 31, 2015 decreased 24% compared with December 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the pension liability due to a higher discount rate and a $10,000,000 contribution to the pension plan.

Total equity as of December 31, 2015 increased 1% compared with December 31, 2014. The increase was primarily the result of  $226,684,000 of net earnings attributable to Kirby for 2015, a $6,308,000 increase in additional paid-in capital and a $16,351,000 increase in accumulated OCI, partially offset by a $234,568,000 increase in treasury stock. The increase in treasury stock was attributable to purchases during 2015 of $241,105,000 of the Company’s common stock, partially offset by the exercise of stock options and the issuance of restricted stock. The increase in additional paid-in capital was due to the excess of proceeds received upon exercise of stock options and the issuance of restricted stock over the cost of the treasury stock issued. The increase in accumulated OCI primarily resulted from the decrease in unrecognized losses related to the Company’s defined benefit plans.


Retirement Plans


The Company sponsors a defined benefit plan for its inland vessel personnel and shore based tankermen. The plan benefits are based on an employee’s years of service and compensation. The plan assets consist primarily of equity and fixed income securities. The Company’s pension plan funding strategy has historically beenis to contribute an amountmake annual contributions in amounts equal to theor greater of the minimum required contribution under ERISA or the amountthan amounts necessary to fully fund the plan on an accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”) basis at the end of the fiscal year.meet minimum government funding requirements. No pension contribution was made in 20162019, 2018 or 2017 for the 2016 year2019, 2018 and the pension contribution for the 2015 year was $10,000,000.2017 plan years. The fair value of plan assets was $257,517,000$319,176,000 and $243,588,000$269,403,000 at December 31, 20162019 and December 31, 2015,2018, respectively.


58



On April 12, 2017, the Company amended its pension plan to cease all benefit accruals for periods after May 31, 2017 for certain participants. Participants grandfathered and not impacted were those, as of the close of business on May 31, 2017, who either (a) had completed 15 years of pension service or (b) had attained age 50 and completed 10 years of pension service. Participants non-grandfathered are eligible to receive discretionary 401(k) plan contributions. The Company did not incur any one-time charges related to this amendment but the pension plan’s projected benefit obligation decreased by $33,433,000.

On February 14, 2018, with the acquisition of Higman, the Company assumed Higman’s pension plan for its inland vessel personnel and office staff. On March 27, 2018, the Company amended the Higman pension plan to close it to all new entrants and cease all benefit accruals for periods after May 15, 2018 for all participants. The Company did not incur any one-time charges related to this amendment but the Higman pension plan’s projected benefit obligation decreased by $3,081,000. The Company made contributions to the Higman pension plan of $1,615,000 in 2019 for the 2018 plan year, $1,449,000 in 2019 for the 2019 plan year, $6,717,000 in 2018 for the 2016 and 2017 plan years and $1,385,000 in 2018 for the 2018 year. The fair value of plan assets was $39,021,000 and $33,748,000 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The Company’s investment strategy focuses on total return on invested assets (capital appreciation plus dividend and interest income). The primary objective in the investment management of assets is to achieve long-term growth of principal while avoiding excessive risk. Risk is managed through diversification of investments within and among asset classes, as well as by choosing securities that have an established trading and underlying operating history.
54


The Company makes various assumptions when determining defined benefit plan costs including, but not limited to, the current discount rate and the expected long-term return on plan assets. Discount rates are determined annually and are based on a yield curve that consists of a hypothetical portfolio of high quality corporate bonds with maturities matching the projected benefit cash flows. The Company used discount rates of 4.2%3.5% and 4.5%4.4% in 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively, in determining its benefit obligations. The Company estimates that every 0.1% decrease in the discount rate results in an increase in the ABOaccumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”) of approximately $4,200,000.$6,582,000. The Company assumed that plan assets would generate a long-term rate of return of 7.0% in both 2019 and 7.5% in 2016 and 2015, respectively.2018. The Company developed its expected long-term rate of return assumption by evaluating input from investment consultants and comparing historical returns for various asset classes with its actual and targeted plan investments. The Company believes that long-term asset allocation, on average, will approximate the targeted allocation.


Long-Term Financing


TheOn March 27, 2019, the Company has a $550,000,000 unsecured revolvingentered into an amended and restated credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicategroup of commercial banks, with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as the administrative agent bank, with a maturity date of April 30, 2020. In addition,that extended the credit agreement allows for a $300,000,000 increase in the aggregate commitmentsterm of the banks in the form ofCompany’s existing $850,000,000 revolving credit loans orfacility (“Revolving Credit Facility”) to March 27, 2024 and added a five-year term loans, subject to the consentloan (“Term Loan”) facility in an amount of each bank that elects to participate in the increased commitment.$500,000,000. The Credit Agreement provides for a variable interest rate spread varies with the Company’s senior debt rating and is currently 1.00% overbased on the London Interbank Offered Rateinterbank offered rate (“LIBOR”) or equal to an alternatea base rate calculated with reference to the agent bank’s prime rate, among other factors (“Alternate(the “Alternate Base Rate”). The commitment feeinterest rate varies with the Company’s credit rating and is currently 0.10%.112.5 basis points over LIBOR or 12.5 basis points over the Alternate Base Rate. The RevolvingTerm Loan is repayable in quarterly installments originally scheduled to commence June 30, 2020, in increasing percentages of the original principal amount of the loan, with the remaining unpaid balance payable of 65% of the initial amount due on March 27, 2024. During 2019, the Company repaid $125,000,000 under the Term Loan prior to the scheduled installments.  As a result, no repayments are required until September 30, 2023.  The Credit FacilityAgreement contains certain restrictive financial covenants including an interest coverage ratio and a debt-to-capitalization ratio. In addition to financial covenants, the Revolving Credit FacilityAgreement contains covenants that, subject to exceptions, restrict debt incurrence, mergers and acquisitions, sales of assets, dividends and investments, liquidations and dissolutions, capital leases, transactions with affiliates and changes in lines of business. The Credit Agreement specifies certain events of default, upon the occurrence of which the maturity of the outstanding loans may be accelerated, including the failure to pay principal or interest, violation of covenants and default on other indebtedness, among other events. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit FacilityAgreement may be used for general corporate purposes the purchase of existing or new equipment, the purchase of the Company’s common stock, or for businessincluding acquisitions. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company was in compliance with all Revolving Credit FacilityAgreement covenants and had $225,986,000 of debtno outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.Facility and $375,000,000 outstanding under the Term Loan. The Revolving Credit Facility includes a $25,000,000 commitment which may be used for standby letters of credit. Outstanding letters of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility were $2,518,000$5,258,000 as of December 31, 2016.2019.


59



On February 12, 2018, the Company issued $500,000,000 of 4.2% senior unsecured notes due March 1, 2028 (the “2028 Notes”) with U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. Interest payments of $10,500,000 are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1 of each year. The Company received cash proceeds of $495,019,000, net of the original issue discount of $705,000 and debt issuance costs of $4,276,000. The 2028 Notes are unsecured and rank equally in right of payment with the Company’s other unsecured senior indebtedness. The 2028 Notes contain certain covenants on the part of the Company, including covenants relating to liens, sale-leasebacks, asset sales and mergers, among others. The 2028 Notes also specify certain events of default, upon the occurrence of which the maturity of the notes may be accelerated, including failure to pay principal and interest, violation of covenants or default on other indebtedness, among others. The Company used the proceeds from the issuance of the 2028 Notes to fund the acquisition of Higman. The remaining net proceeds of the sale of the 2028 Notes were used for the repayment of indebtedness under the Company’s bank credit facilities. As of December 31, 2019, the Company was in compliance with all the 2028 Notes covenants and had $500,000,000 outstanding under the 2028 Notes.

The Company has $500,000,000 of unsecured senior notes (“Senior Notes Series A” and “Senior Notes Series B”) with a group of institutional investors, consisting of $150,000,000 of 2.72% Senior Notes Series A due February 27, 2020 and $350,000,000 of 3.29% Senior Notes Series B due February 27, 2023. No principal payments are required until maturity. The Senior Notes Series A and Series B contain certain covenants on the part of the Company, including an interest coverage covenant, a debt-to-capitalization covenant and covenants relating to liens, asset sales and mergers, among others. The Senior Notes Series A and Series B also specify certain events of default, upon the occurrence of which the maturity of the notes may be accelerated, including failure to pay principal and interest, violation of covenants or default on other indebtedness, among others. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company was in compliance with all Senior Notes Series A and Series B covenants and had $150,000,000 of Senior Notes Series A outstanding and $350,000,000 of Senior Notes Series B outstanding. The Senior Notes Series A are excluded from short term liabilities because the Company has the ability and the intent to repay the amount due using borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.


The Company has a $10,000,000 line of credit (“Credit Line”) with Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”) for short-term liquidity needs and letters of credit, with a maturity date of June 30, 2017.2021. The Credit Line allows the Company to borrow at an interest rate agreed to by Bank of America and the Company at the time each borrowing is made or continued. The Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Line as of December 31, 2016.2019. Outstanding letters of credit under the Credit Line were $1,012,000$1,171,000 as of December 31, 2016.2019.
55


Capital Expenditures Reflected on the Balance Sheet


Capital expenditures for 20162019 were $233,103,000,$234,289,000, including $10,676,000$22,008,000 for inland towboat construction, $18,433,000 for progress payments on three 5000 horsepower coastal ATB tugboats, $2,294,000 for final costs on a 155,000 barrel coastal ATB under construction purchased from another operator that was delivered to the Company in the 2018 fourth quarter, and $191,554,000 primarily for upgrading existing marine equipment and marine transportation and distribution and services facilities.

Capital expenditures for 2018 were $318,302,000, including $26,172,000 for inland tank barge and towboat construction, $14,884,000 in final costs for the construction of two 185,000 barrel coastal ATBs, one placed in service in late 2015 and the second in June 2016, $74,689,000 for progress payments on the construction of two 155,000 barrel coastal ATBs, one placed in service in November 2016 and the second scheduled to be placed in service in the summer of 2017, $10,098,000 for progress payments on the construction of two 4900 horsepower coastal tugboats, $6,593,000 for progress payments on the construction of a 35,000 barrel coastal petrochemical tank barge placed in service in December 2016, $18,000$41,653,000 for progress payments on six 5000 horsepower coastal ATB tugboats, $116,145,000$71,660,000 for a 155,000 barrel coastal ATB under construction purchased from another operator that was delivered to the Company in the 2018 fourth quarter, and $178,817,000 primarily for upgrading existing marine equipment and marine transportation and diesel enginedistribution and services facilities. The Company purchased the inland tank barge fleet

60



Financing of the construction of the inland tank barges and towboats theand coastal tank bargebarges and tugboat units, the coastal tugboats the coastal petrochemical tank bargeplus upgrades of existing equipment and purchases of the inland tank barge fleet of Seacor, the four coastal tugboats, the previously leased coastal tank barge,marine transportation and the six inland pressure tank bargesdistribution and services facilities was through operating cash flows and available credit under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility.


During 2016,2019, the Company took delivery of five newacquired 63 inland tank barges from Cenac with a total capacity of approximately 141,0001,833,000 barrels, acquired 27retired 17 inland tank barges, from Seacor with a total capacity of approximately 807,000 barrels, transferred one tank barge into the inland fleet from the coastal fleet with a capacity of 31,000 barrels, added one leasedsold six inland tank barge with a capacity of 11,000 barrels, returned six leasedbarges, brought back into service eight inland tank barges, and retired 50chartered two inland tank barges, reducingdecreasing its capacity by approximately 1,038,000271,000 barrels. The net result was a reductionan increase of 2250 inland tank barges and approximately 48,0001,562,000 barrels of capacity during 2016.2019.

The Company projects that capital expenditures for 20172020 will be in the $165,000,000$155,000,000 to $185,000,000$175,000,000 range. The 20172020 construction program will consist of two inland tank barges with a total capacity of 57,000 barrels, one inland towboat,$25,000,000 to $30,000,000 in progress payments on the construction of a 155,000 barrel coastal ATB scheduledsix inland towboats to be placed in service in the summer of 2017, progress payments on the construction of two 4900 horsepower coastal tugboats and six 5000 horsepower coastal ATB tugboats and final costs on the construction of a 35,000 barrel coastal petrochemical tank barge placed in service in December 2016. Based on current commitments, steel prices and projected delivery schedules, the Company’s 2017 payments on new inland tank barges and the towboat will be approximately $3,000,000, 2017 progress payments on the construction of the 155,000 barrel coastal ATB will be approximately $7,000,000, 2017 progress payments on the construction of the two 4900 horsepower coastal tugboats will be approximately $16,000,000, progress payments on the six 5000 horsepower coastal ATB tugboats will be approximately $27,000,000 and final costs on the construction of the 35,000 barrel coastal petrochemical tank barge will be approximately $2,000,000. The balance of approximately2020.  Approximately $110,000,000 to $130,000,000$120,000,000 is primarily capital upgrades and improvements to existing marine equipment and marine transportationfacilities. The balance of $20,000,000 to $25,000,000 will be for new machinery and diesel engineequipment, facilities improvements and information technology projects in the distribution and services facilities.segment and corporate.
56


Funding for future capital expenditures is expected to be provided through operating cash flows and available credit under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility.


Treasury Stock Purchases


In February 2016,The Company did not purchase any treasury stock during 2019.  During 2018, the Company purchased 35,00011,000 shares of its common stock for $1,827,000,$776,000, for an average price of $52.53$69.61 per share.share pursuant to a stock trading plan entered into with a brokerage firm pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company did not purchase any treasury stock during 2017. As of February 22, 2017,20, 2020, the Company had approximately 1,411,0001,400,000 shares available under its existing repurchase authorizations. TheHistorically, treasury stock purchases arehave been financed through operating cash flows and borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility. The Company is authorized to purchase its common stock on the New York Stock Exchange and in privately negotiated transactions. When purchasing its common stock, the Company is subject to price, trading volume and other market considerations. Shares purchased may be used for reissuance upon the exercise of stock options or the granting of other forms of incentive compensation, in future acquisitions for stock or for other appropriate corporate purposes.


Liquidity


The Company generated net cash provided by operating activities of $414,038,000, $521,305,000$511,813,000, $346,999,000 and $438,909,000$353,378,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively. The 2016increase in 2019 was driven by increased revenues and operating income in the marine transportation segment driven by the acquisitions of the Higman fleet in February 2018, the Targa fleet in May 2018, the CGBM barges in December 2018, and the Cenac fleet in March 2019, as well as improved barge utilization in the coastal market and higher spot and term pricing in the inland and coastal markets. The increase was also due to a net increase in cash flows from the change in operating assets and liabilities of $153,953,000, primarily due to a decrease in inventories reflecting reduced business activity levels in the distribution and services segment in 2019 compared to an increase in 2018.

The 2018 year experienced a net decrease in cash flows from changes in operating assets and liabilities of $12,452,000$65,436 compared with a net increase2017, primarily due to higher inventories, including work in 2015 of $3,530,000.

The 2015 year experiencedprocess, in the distribution and services oil and gas market during 2018, primarily to support the increased business activity levels, partially offset by a net increase in cash flows from changes in operating assets and liabilities of $3,530,000 compared with a net decrease in 2014 of $125,761,000.  The increase was primarilytrade receivables due to a decrease in receivables in 2015 due to reduced business activity levels compared to an increase in receivables and inventory during 2014 due to increased business activity levelsrevenues recognized in the land-based diesel enginedistribution and services market.oil and gas market in the 2018 fourth quarter driven by lower demand for new and overhauled transmissions and related parts and remanufactured pressure pumping units from some key oilfield customers.


61



Funds generated from operations are available for acquisitions, capital expenditure projects, common stock repurchases, repayments of borrowings and for other corporate and operating requirements. In addition to net cash flow provided by operating activities, the Company also had available as of February 22, 2017, $342,280,00020, 2020, $844,742,000 under its Revolving Credit Facility and $8,988,000$8,829,000 available under its Credit Line.


Neither the Company, nor any of its subsidiaries, is obligated on any debt instrument, swap agreement, or any other financial instrument or commercial contract which has a rating trigger, except for pricing grids on its Revolving Credit Facility.Agreement.


The Company expects to continue to fund expenditures for acquisitions, including Savage, capital construction projects, common stock repurchases, repayment of borrowings, and for other operating requirements from a combination of available cash and cash equivalents, funds generated from operating activities and available financing arrangements.


The Revolving Credit Facility’s commitment is in the amount of $550,000,000$850,000,000 and expires April 30, 2020.March 27, 2024. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company had $324,014,000$844,742,000 available under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Senior Notes Series A  notes mature on February 27, 2020 and the Company intends to repay the $150,000,000 outstanding using borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.  The Senior Notes Series B do not mature until February 27, 2020 and February 27, 2023, respectively, and require no prepayments. The 2028 Notes do not mature until March 1, 2028 and require no prepayments.  The outstanding balance of the Term Loan is subject to quarterly installments, currently beginning September 30, 2023, in increasing percentages of the original principal amount of the loan, with the remaining unpaid balance payable of 65% of the initial amount due on March 27, 2024. The Term Loan is prepayable, in whole or in part, without penalty.


There are numerous factors that may negatively impact the Company’s cash flow in 2017.2019. For a list of significant risks and uncertainties that could impact cash flows, see Note 13,15, Contingencies and Commitments in the financial statements, and Item 1A — Risk Factors. Amounts available under the Company’s existing financialfinancing arrangements are subject to the Company continuing to meet the covenants of the credit facilities as described in Note 5,8, Long-Term Debt in the financial statements.
57


The Company has issued guaranties or obtained standby letters of credit and performance bonds supporting performance by the Company and its subsidiaries of contractual or contingent legal obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries incurred in the ordinary course of business. The aggregate notional value of these instruments is $13,983,000$22,804,000 at December 31, 2016,2019, including $3,799,000$11,240,000 in letters of credit and $10,184,000$11,564,000 in performance bonds. All of these instruments have an expiration date within threetwo years. The Company does not believe demand for payment under these instruments is likely and expects no material cash outlays to occur in connection with these instruments.


All of the Company’s marine transportation term contracts contain fuel escalation clauses, or the customer pays for the fuel. However, there is generally a 30 to 90 day delay before contracts are adjusted depending on the specific contract. In general, the fuel escalation clauses are effective over the long-term in allowing the Company to recover changes in fuel costs due to fuel price changes. However, the short-term effectiveness of the fuel escalation clauses can be affected by a number of factors including, but not limited to, specific terms of the fuel escalation formulas, fuel price volatility, navigating conditions, tow sizes, trip routing, and the location of loading and discharge ports that may result in the Company over or under recovering its fuel costs. SpotThe Company’s spot contract rates generally reflect current fuel prices at the time the contract is signed but do not have escalators for fuel.


During the last three years, inflation has had a relatively minor effect on the financial results of the Company. The marine transportation segment has long-term contracts which generally contain cost escalation clauses whereby certain costs, including fuel as noted above, can be passed through to its customers. Spot contract rates include the cost of fuel and are subject to market volatility. The repair portion of the diesel enginedistribution and services segment is based on prevailing current market rates.


62



Contractual Obligations


The contractual obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries at December 31, 20162019 consisted of the following (in thousands):


 Payments Due By Period  Payments Due By Period 
 Total  
Less Than
1 Year
  
2-3
Years
  
4-5
Years
  
After
5 Years
  Total  
Less Than
1 Year
  
2-3
Years
  
4-5
Years
  
After
5 Years
 
Long-term debt $725,986  $  $  $375,986  $350,000  $1,375,016  $150,016  $  $725,000  $500,000 
Non-cancelable operating leases — barges  31,579   10,419   13,299   5,387   2,474   22,027   4,387   8,272   4,320   5,048 
Non-cancelable operating leases — towing vessels(a)  104,795   83,949   20,846         24,327   7,059   5,156   5,156   6,956 
Non-cancelable operating leases — land, buildings and equipment  120,810   12,027   19,878   14,515   74,390   163,512   21,928   35,581   25,016   80,987 
Barge and towing vessel construction contracts  95,603   54,032   41,571       
 $1,078,773  $160,427  $95,594  $395,888  $426,864  $1,584,882  $183,390  $49,009  $759,492  $592,991 


(a)
Towing vessel payments are determined in accordance with Topic 842, Leases, and exclude non-lease components.  The Company estimates that non-lease components comprise approximately 75% of charter rental costs, related to towboat crew costs, maintenance and insurance.

Approximately half85% of the towboat charter agreements are for terms of one year or less. The Company’s towboat rental agreements provide the Company with the option to terminate most agreements with notice ranging from seven to 90 days. The Company estimates that 80% of the charter rental cost is related to towboat crew costs, maintenance and insurance.


The Company’s pension plan funding strategy has historically beenis to contribute an amountmake annual contributions in amounts equal to theor greater of the minimum required contribution under ERISA or the amountthan amounts necessary to fully fund the plan on an ABO basis at the end of the fiscal year.meet minimum government funding requirements. The ABO is based on a variety of demographic and economic assumptions, and the pension plan assets’ returns are subject to various risks, including market and interest rate risk, making an accurate prediction of the pension plan contribution difficult resulting in the Company electing to only make an expected pension contribution forecast of one year. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company’s pension plan funding was 86% of the pension plans’ ABO, including the Higman pension plan. The Company made a contribution of $483,000 in January 2020 for the 2019 plan was funded at 94%year.  The Company expects to make additional pension contributions of $314,000 in 2020 for the ABO.2019 plan year and $1,610,000 for the 2020 plan year.
58


Accounting Standards


In August 2016, the FinancialFor a discussion of recently issued accounting standards, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”) to create consistency in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.Policies.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”) which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, forfeitures, minimum statutory tax withholding requirements, classification as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company will adopt the provisions of ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017 and the Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-09 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. However, the adoption will result in some income statement volatility in 2017 and beyond due to the requirement that the tax effects of exercised or vested equity awards be recognized as discrete items in income tax expense or benefit in the income statement in the reporting period in which they occur.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”) to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective approach is required. The Company has formed a project team to evaluate the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures. The project team has completed training on the new standard and has started lease review and documentation, but the Company has not yet determined the effect of ASU 2016-02 on its ongoing financial reporting.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”) which requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The current requirement that deferred tax liabilities and assets of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not affected by this guidance. ASU 2015-17 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016 but early application is permitted and the guidance may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assets or retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company will adopt the provisions of ASU 2015-17 on January 1, 2017 and the Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-17 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015-11”) which applies to inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) or average cost. Under the guidance, an entity should measure inventory that is within the scope of this update at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied prospectively with early adoption permitted at the beginning of an interim period or annual reporting period. The Company will adopt the provisions of ASU 2015-11 on January 1, 2017 and the Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-11 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the associated debt liability. Effective January 1, 2016, the Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 and prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. The December 31, 2015 net debt issuance costs of $3,985,000 have been reclassified in the consolidated balance sheet from other assets to long-term debt, less current portion.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40):  Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU 2014-15”), which provides guidance about management's responsibility in evaluating whether there is substantial doubt relating to an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures as applicable.    Adoption of ASU 2014-15 as of December 31, 2016 did not impact the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.
59

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles when it becomes effective. In July 2015, the FASB voted to delay the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year, making it effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date. ASU 2014-09 permits the use of either the retrospective, modified retrospective or prospective with a cumulative catch-up approach. The Company has formed a project team to evaluate the standard and determine the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The project team has completed training on the new standard and has started contract review and documentation. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of ASU 2014-09 on its ongoing financial reporting.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk


The Company is exposed to risk from changes in interest rates on certain of its outstanding debt. The outstanding loan balances under the Company’s bank credit facilities bear interest at variable rates based on prevailing short-term interest rates in the United States and Europe. A 10% change in variable interest rates would impact the 20172020 interest expense by $172,000$206,000 based on balances outstanding at December 31, 2016,2019, and would change the fair value of the Company’s debt by less than 1%.


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


The response to this item is submitted as a separate section of this report (see Item 15, page 97)105).


63



Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure


Not applicable.


Item 9A.Controls and Procedures


Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act)Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)), as of December 31, 2016.2019, as required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2016,2019, the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162019 using the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2019. KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as stated in their report which is included herein.

60

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. ThereExcept for remediation of the previously identified material weakness, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20162019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


As previously described in Part II, Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company began implementing a remediation plan and removed all inappropriate privileged access rights as of March 31, 2019. The Company completed the testing and evaluation of the operating effectiveness of the affected Information Technology operating systems, databases and applications, and based on the results of the testing, the controls are operating effectively as of December 31, 2019.

64



PART III


Items 10
Through 14.


The information for these items is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement to be filed by the Company with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2019, except for the information regarding executive officers which is provided under Item 1.

61
65



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TheTo the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders
Kirby Corporation:


Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Kirby Corporation and consolidated subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015, and2018, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows and stockholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016. 2019 and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 21, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), and related amendments, and its method of accounting for recognizing revenues as of January 1, 2018 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), and related amendments.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.




Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Assessment of the acquisition-date fair value of property and equipment assets

As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, on March 14, 2019, the Company acquired the marine transportation fleet of Cenac Marine Services, LLC (Cenac).  Cenac’s fleet consisted of 63 inland tank barges, 34 inland towboats and two offshore tugboats. The acquisition-date fair value for these assets was $247 million.

We identified the assessment of the acquisition-date fair value of these assets as a critical audit matter. There was a high degree of subjectivity in applying and evaluating the results of our testing of the approach used to determine the fair value of these assets, which included internally-developed adjustments for which there were limited observable market information. These adjustments included physical depreciation based on normal useful life and estimated salvage value. In addition, the sensitivity of these adjustments to reasonably possible changesresulted in the application of greater auditor judgment.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s acquisition-date valuation process, including controls over the development of the adjustments utilized in the determination of fair value of the assets. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

evaluating the estimated fair values of the assets,
evaluating the estimated physical depreciation using the normal useful life ranges based on industry standard useful life guidelines published by the American Society of Appraisers and observable third party market information and experience with valuing similar assets, and
evaluating the salvage values and comparing them to current market prices for scrap metal on a per ton basis.

Evaluation of potential impairment indicators for offshore vessel classes

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment by vessel class whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable (triggering events).  Recoverability of the vessel classes is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

We identified the evaluation of potential impairment indicators for offshore vessel classes to be a critical audit matter.  Evaluating the Company’s judgments in determining whether a triggering event exists required a high degree of subjective auditor judgment.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s process to identify and assess the triggering events that indicate that the carrying amount of an offshore vessel class may not be recoverable. These included controls related to the consideration of forecasted to actual operating results and market conditions in the determination of a triggering event. We evaluated the Company’s identification of triggering events, including future expected revenues from executed contracts with customers. We compared data used by the Company noting that such factors included both internal and external factors to analyst and industry reports.  We evaluated responses as to factors considered and evaluated whether the Company omitted any significant internal or external factors in their evaluation. We evaluated the Company’s data and assumptions when we identified information that was contrary to that used by the Company.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1992.

Houston, Texas
February 21, 2020



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Kirby Corporation:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Kirby Corporation andconsolidated subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,Company maintained, in all material respects, theeffective internal control over financial position of Kirby Corporation and consolidated subsidiariesreporting as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the resultsCommittee of their operations and their cash flows for eachSponsoring Organizations of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.Treadway Commission.


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), Kirby Corporation’s internal control over financial reportingthe consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by2019 and 2018, the Committeerelated consolidated statements of Sponsoring Organizationsearnings, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the Treadway Commission (COSO)years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 23, 201721, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control overthose consolidated financial reporting.statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Houston, Texas
February 23, 2017

Basis for Opinion
62

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders 
Kirby Corporation:

We have audited Kirby Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Kirby Corporation’sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


In our opinion, Kirby Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)./s/ KPMG LLP


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Kirby Corporation and consolidated subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, and our report dated Houston, Texas
February 23, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.21, 2020

/s/ KPMG LLP
Houston, Texas
February 23, 2017


63
68



KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 20162019 and 20152018


 2016  2015  2019  2018 
 ($ in thousands)  ($ in thousands) 
ASSETS            
Current assets:            
Cash and cash equivalents $5,634  $5,885  $24,737  $7,800 
Accounts receivable:                
Trade — less allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,240 ($9,374 in 2015)  297,177   290,931 
Trade — less allowance for doubtful accounts of $8,372 ($10,024 in 2018)  379,174   417,644 
Other  95,327   102,443   104,175   104,239 
Inventories — at lower of average cost or market  185,402   184,511 
Inventories — at lower of average cost or net realizable value  351,401   507,441 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  49,411   45,283   58,092   59,365 
Deferred income taxes  13,604   11,723 
Total current assets  646,555   640,776   917,579   1,096,489 
                
Property and equipment:                
Marine transportation equipment  4,071,972   3,806,850   4,770,213   4,477,718 
Land, buildings and equipment  256,925   252,913   553,877   534,106 
  4,328,897   4,059,763   5,324,090   5,011,824 
Accumulated depreciation  1,407,523   1,280,783   (1,546,980)  (1,472,022)
Property and equipment — net  2,921,374   2,778,980   3,777,110   3,539,802 
Operating lease right-of-use assets  159,641    
Investment in affiliates  2,622   2,090   2,025   2,495 
Goodwill  598,131   586,718   953,826   953,826 
Other intangibles, net  210,682   224,197 
Other assets  134,817   143,717   58,234   54,785 
Total assets $4,303,499  $4,152,281  $6,079,097  $5,871,594 
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
Current liabilities:                
Current portion of long-term debt $  $ 
Bank notes payable $16  $19 
Income taxes payable  3,288   3,564   665   2,794 
Accounts payable  134,571   132,799   206,778   278,057 
Accrued liabilities:                
Interest  5,397   5,412   12,700   13,171 
Insurance premiums and claims  123,371   111,705   108,405   109,634 
Employee compensation  26,916   37,243   42,875   53,089 
Taxes — other than on income  15,481   13,525   39,286   38,680 
Other  13,313   16,369   33,084   32,215 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities  27,324    
Deferred revenues  36,001   41,300   42,982   80,123 
Total current liabilities  358,338   361,917   514,115   607,782 
Long-term debt — less current portion  722,802   774,849 
Long-term debt, net — less current portion  1,369,751   1,410,169 
Deferred income taxes  719,057   669,808   588,204   542,785 
Operating lease liabilities — less current portion  139,457    
Other long-term liabilities  90,435   66,511   95,978   94,557 
Total long-term liabilities  1,532,294   1,511,168   2,193,390   2,047,511 
                
Contingencies and commitments            
        
Equity:                
Kirby stockholders’ equity:                
Common stock, $.10 par value per share. Authorized 120,000,000 shares, issued 59,776,000 in 2016 and 2015  5,978   5,978 
Common stock, $0.10 par value per share. Authorized 120,000,000 shares, issued 65,472,000 in 2019 and 2018  6,547   6,547 
Additional paid-in capital  432,459   434,783   835,899   823,347 
Accumulated other comprehensive income — net  (51,007)  (44,686)  (37,799)  (33,511)
Retained earnings  2,342,236   2,200,830   2,865,939   2,723,592 
Treasury stock — at cost, 5,921,000 shares in 2016 and 6,056,000 in 2015  (320,348)  (328,094)
Treasury stock — at cost, 5,513,000 shares in 2019 and 5,608,000 shares in 2018  (301,963)  (306,788)
Total Kirby stockholders’ equity  2,409,318   2,268,811   3,368,623   3,213,187 
Noncontrolling interests  3,549   10,385   2,969   3,114 
Total equity  2,412,867   2,279,196   3,371,592   3,216,301 
Total liabilities and equity $4,303,499  $4,152,281  $6,079,097  $5,871,594 


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

64
69





KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017


 2016  2015  2014  2019  2018  2017 
 ($ in thousands, except per share amounts)  ($ in thousands, except per share amounts) 
Revenues:                  
Marine transportation $1,471,893  $1,663,090  $1,770,684  $1,587,082  $1,483,143  $1,324,106 
Diesel engine services  298,780   484,442   795,634 
Distribution and services  1,251,317   1,487,554   890,312 
Total revenues  1,770,673   2,147,532   2,566,318   2,838,399   2,970,697   2,214,418 
                        
Costs and expenses:                        
Costs of sales and operating expenses  1,126,952   1,362,366   1,694,882   2,030,046   2,160,946   1,558,098 
Selling, general and administrative  174,752   193,237   210,416   312,913   304,397   220,452 
Taxes, other than on income  22,730   20,699   16,677   41,933   39,251   29,163 
Depreciation and amortization  200,917   192,240   169,312   219,632   224,972   202,881 
Impairment of long-lived assets     82,705   105,712 
Impairment of goodwill     2,702    
Lease cancellation costs     2,403    
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets  127   (1,672)  (781)  (8,152)  (1,968)  4,487 
Total costs and expenses  1,525,478   1,766,870   2,090,506   2,596,372   2,815,408   2,120,793 
Operating income  245,195   380,662   475,812   242,027   155,289   93,625 
Equity in earnings of affiliates  532   451   384   379   355   291 
Other expense  (291)  (663)  (345)
Other income  3,408   5,371   570 
Interest expense  (17,690)  (18,738)  (21,461)  (55,994)  (46,856)  (21,472)
Earnings before taxes on income  227,746   361,712   454,390   189,820   114,159   73,014 
Provision for taxes on income  (84,942)  (133,742)  (169,782)
Benefit (provision) for taxes on income  (46,801)  (35,081)  240,889 
                        
Net earnings  142,804   227,970   284,608   143,019   79,078   313,903 
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests  (1,398)  (1,286)  (2,602)  (672)  (626)  (716)
Net earnings attributable to Kirby $141,406  $226,684  $282,006  $142,347  $78,452  $313,187 
                        
Net earnings per share attributable to Kirby common stockholders:                        
Basic $2.63  $4.12  $4.95  $2.38  $1.31  $5.62 
Diluted $2.62  $4.11  $4.93  $2.37  $1.31  $5.62 


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

65
70





KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017


 2016  2015  2014  2019  2018  2017 
 ($ in thousands)  ($ in thousands) 
            
Net earnings $142,804  $227,970  $284,608  $143,019  $79,078  $313,903 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:                        
Pension and postretirement benefits  (6,321)  16,322   (44,294)  (4,203)  7,638   18,748 
Foreign currency translation adjustments     29   (35)  (85)  (819)  (146)
Change in fair value of derivative instruments        85 
Reclassification to retained earnings of stranded tax effects from tax reform     (7,925)   
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes  (6,321)  16,351   (44,244)  (4,288)  (1,106)  18,602 
                        
Total comprehensive income, net of taxes  136,483   244,321   240,364   138,731   77,972   332,505 
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests  (1,398)  (1,286)  (2,602)  (672)  (626)  (716)
Comprehensive income attributable to Kirby $135,085  $243,035  $237,762  $138,059  $77,346  $331,789 


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


66
71



KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017


 2019  2018  2017 
 2016  2015  2014  ($ in thousands) 
 ($ in thousands)          
Cash flows from operating activities:                  
Net earnings $142,804  $227,970  $284,608  $143,019  $79,078  $313,903 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operations:                        
Depreciation and amortization  200,917   192,240   169,312   219,632   224,972   202,881 
Provision (credit) for doubtful accounts  (467)  1,426   3,577   (873)  1,289   224 
Provision for deferred income taxes  51,296   62,755   77,976 
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes  46,839   34,881   (256,263)
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets  127   (1,672)  (781)  (8,152)  (1,968)  4,487 
Equity in earnings of affiliates, net of distributions and contributions  (532)  449   (384)  471   (355)  732 
Impairment and other charges  35,525   85,407   105,712 
Amortization of unearned share-based compensation  11,675   11,104   11,591   13,612   19,104   11,460 
Amortization of leases  (490)      
Amortization of major maintenance costs  19,869   22,126   16,409   23,962   20,760   21,207 
Amortization of debt issuance costs  801   1,377   2,362   1,702   1,218   986 
Increase (decrease) in cash flows resulting from changes in:                        
Accounts receivable  (12,750)  129,908   (176,544)  43,078   12,511   (60,405)
Inventory  3,182   (7,320)  (56,468)  122,773   (144,685)  19,673 
Other assets  (30,853)  (15,551)  (14,145)  (25,470)  (38,090)  (17,049)
Income taxes payable  15,413   477   (4,544)  (2,503)  (457)  (11,823)
Accounts payable  (1,739)  (81,808)  44,645   (57,405)  22,622   20,758 
Accrued and other liabilities  14,295   (22,176)  81,295   (43,907)  30,712   (3,105)
Net cash provided by operating activities  414,038   521,305   438,909   511,813   346,999   353,378 
                        
Cash flows from investing activities:                        
Capital expenditures  (231,066)  (345,475)  (355,144)  (248,164)  (301,861)  (177,222)
Acquisitions of businesses and marine equipment  (137,072)  (41,250)  (31,800)
Acquisitions of businesses and marine equipment, net of cash acquired  (262,491)  (533,897)  (470,101)
Proceeds from disposition of assets  18,617   24,429   10,393   57,657   53,392   54,229 
Other     (250)   
Net cash used in investing activities  (349,521)  (362,296)  (376,551)  (452,998)  (782,616)  (593,094)
                        
Cash flows from financing activities:                        
Borrowings (payments) on bank credit facilities, net  (52,848)  160,784   75,550   (417,376)  (78,455)  269,859 
Borrowings on long-term debt  500,000   499,295    
Payments on long-term debt     (100,000)  (108,000)  (125,000)     (13,721)
Payment of debt issue costs  (2,397)  (4,276)  (1,243)
Return of investment to noncontrolling interests  (1,976)  (1,778)  (3,192)  (817)  (915)  (862)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  321   3,712   7,519   5,743   13,264   3,039 
Purchase of treasury stock  (1,827)  (241,105)  (15,321)     (776)   
Payment of contingent liability        (4,756)
Payments related to tax withholding for share-based compensation  (2,031)  (4,822)  (2,881)
Acquisitions of noncontrolling interest  (8,438)              (7)
Excess tax benefit from equity compensation plans     964   6,119 
Net cash used in financing activities  (64,768)  (177,423)  (42,081)
            
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (41,878)  423,315   254,184 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (251)  (18,414)  20,277   16,937   (12,302)  14,468 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  5,885   24,299   4,022   7,800   20,102   5,634 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $5,634  $5,885  $24,299  $24,737  $7,800  $20,102 
                        
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:                        
Cash paid during the period:            
Interest paid $19,878  $20,586  $19,622  $55,766  $40,772  $21,663 
Income taxes paid $18,162  $69,584  $90,460  $2,926  $640  $27,196 
Operating cash outflow from operating leases $39,376  $  $ 
Non-cash investing activity:            
Capital expenditures included in accounts payable $(2,037) $2,206  $  $13,875  $(16,441) $5,525 
Fair value of property transferred in acquisition $3,681  $  $ 
Stock issued in acquisition $  $  $366,554 
Cash acquired in acquisition $  $2,313  $98 
Debt assumed in acquisition $  $  $13,724 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations $21,195  $  $ 


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

67
72




KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017


  2016  2015  2014 
  ($ in thousands) 
Common stock:         
Balance at beginning and end of year $5,978  $5,978  $5,978 
             
Additional paid-in capital:            
Balance at beginning of year $434,783  $428,475  $410,615 
Excess (deficit) of proceeds received upon exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock over cost of treasury stock issued  (755)  3,530   8,345 
Tax benefit (expense) realized from equity compensation plans  (824)  964   6,119 
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures  (10,218)  (9,290)  (8,195)
Amortization of unearned compensation  11,675   11,104   11,591 
Acquisitions of noncontrolling interests  (2,202)      
Balance at end of year $432,459  $434,783  $428,475 
             
Accumulated other comprehensive income:            
Balance at beginning of year $(44,686) $(61,037) $(16,793)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes  (6,321)  16,351   (44,244)
Balance at end of year $(51,007) $(44,686) $(61,037)
             
Retained earnings:            
Balance at beginning of year $2,200,830  $1,974,146  $1,692,140 
Net earnings attributable to Kirby for the year  141,406   226,684   282,006 
Balance at end of year $2,342,236  $2,200,830  $1,974,146 
             
Treasury stock:            
Balance at beginning of year $(328,094) $(93,526) $(81,254)
Purchase of treasury stock (35,000 in 2016 and 3,316,000 in 2015)  (1,827)  (241,105)  (15,321)
Cost of treasury stock issued upon exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock (170,000 in 2016, 166,000 in 2015 and 211,000 in 2014)  9,573   6,537   3,049 
Balance at end of year $(320,348) $(328,094) $(93,526)
             
Noncontrolling interests:            
Balance at beginning of year $10,385  $10,877  $11,467 
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests  1,398   1,286   2,602 
Return of investment to noncontrolling interests  (1,976)  (1,778)  (3,192)
Acquisitions of noncontrolling interests  (6,258)      
Balance at the end of year $3,549  $10,385  $10,877 
 
Common
Stock
  
Additional
Paid-in-
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
  Retained  Treasury Stock  Noncontrolling    
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Income  Earnings  Shares  Amount  Interests  Total 
  (in thousands) 
Balance at December 31, 2016  59,776  $5,978  $432,459  $(51,007) $2,342,236   (5,921) $(320,348) $3,549  $2,412,867 
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2016-09              (8,486)           (8,486)
Stock option exercises        (531)        69   3,603      3,072 
Issuance of shares in acquisition  5,696   569   365,985                  366,554 
Issuance of stock for equity awards, net of forfeitures        (6,406)        113   6,406       
Tax withholdings on equity award vesting                 (44)  (2,881)     (2,881)
Amortization of unearned share-based compensation        11,460                  11,460 
Total comprehensive income, net of taxes           18,602   313,187         716   332,505 
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest        (6)                 (6)
Return of investment to noncontrolling interests                       (862)  (862)
Balance at December 31, 2017  65,472  $6,547  $802,961  $(32,405) $2,646,937   (5,783) $(313,220) $3,403  $3,114,223 
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2014-09              (9,722)           (9,722)
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2018-02              7,925            7,925 
Stock option exercises        2,161         232   11,151      13,312 
Issuance of stock for equity awards, net of forfeitures        (879)        15   879       
Tax withholdings on equity award vesting                 (61)  (4,822)     (4,822)
Amortization of unearned share-based compensation        19,104                  19,104 
Treasury stock purchases                 (11)  (776)     (776)
Total comprehensive income, net of taxes           (1,106)  78,452         626   77,972 
Return of investment to noncontrolling interests                       (915)  (915)
Balance at December 31, 2018  65,472  $6,547  $823,347  $(33,511) $2,723,592   (5,608) $(306,788) $3,114  $3,216,301 
Stock option exercises        675         93   5,121      5,796 
Issuance of stock for equity awards, net of forfeitures        (1,735)        32   1,735       
Tax withholdings on equity award vesting                 (30)  (2,031)     (2,031)
Amortization of unearned share-based compensation        13,612                  13,612 
Total comprehensive income, net of taxes           (4,288)  142,347         672   138,731 
Return of investment to noncontrolling interests                       (817)  (817)
Balance at December 31, 2019  65,472  $6,547  $835,899  $(37,799) $2,865,939   (5,513) $(301,963) $2,969  $3,371,592 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

68
73





KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(1)   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies



Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Kirby Corporation and all majority-owned subsidiaries (“the Company”(the “Company”). All investments in which the Company owns 20% to 50% and exercises significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for using the equity method. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to reflect the current presentation of financial information.


Accounting Policies



Cash Equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of all short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at date of purchase.



Accounts Receivable. In the normal course of business, the Company extends credit to its customers. The Company regularly reviews the accounts and makes adequate provisions for probable uncollectible balances. It is the Company’s opinion that the accounts have no impairment, other than that for which provisions have been made. Included in accounts receivablereceivable-trade as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 were $84,453,000$103,996,000 and $90,166,000,$114,159,000, respectively, of accruals for revenues earned which have not been invoiced as of the end of each year.



The Company’s marine transportation and diesel enginedistribution and services operations are subject to hazards associated with such businesses. The Company maintains insurance coverage against these hazards with insurance companies. Included in accounts receivablereceivable-other as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 were $88,182,000$72,591,000 and $77,684,000,$69,624,000, respectively, of receivables from insurance companies to cover claims in excess of the Company’s deductible.



Concentrations of Credit Risk. Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily trade accounts receivables. The Company’s marine transportation customers include the major oil refining and petrochemical companies. The diesel enginedistribution and services customers are oilfield service companies, oil and gas serviceoperators and producers, on-highway transportation companies, marine transportation companies, commercial fishing companies, construction companies, power generation companies, and the United States government. The Company regularly reviews its accounts and estimates the amount of uncollectible receivables each period and establishes an allowance for uncollectible amounts. The amount of the allowance is based on the age of unpaid amounts, information about the current financial strength of customers, and other relevant information. Estimates of uncollectible amounts are revised each period, and changes are recorded in the period they become known.


Fair Value of Financial Instruments. Cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities have carrying values that approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The fair value of the Company’s debt instruments is more fully described in Note 5, Long-Term Debt.

Property, Maintenance and Repairs. Property is recorded at cost.cost or acquisition date fair value, Improvements and betterments are capitalized as incurred. Depreciation is recorded on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the individual assets as follows: marine transportation equipment, 5-40 years; buildings, 10-40 years; other equipment, 2-10 years; and leasehold improvements, term of lease. When property items are retired, sold or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts with any gain or loss on the disposition included in the statement of earnings. Maintenance and repairs on vessels built for use on the inland waterways are charged to operating expense as incurred and includes the costs incurred in United States Coast Guard (“USCG”) inspections unless the shipyard extends the life or improves the operating capacity of the vessel which results in the costs being capitalized.

Drydocking on Ocean-Going Vessels. The Company’s ocean-going vessels are subject to regulatory drydocking requirements after certain periods of time to be inspected, have planned major maintenance performed and be recertified by the American Bureau of Shipping (“ABS”). These recertifications generally occur twice in a five year period. The Company defers the drydocking expenditures incurred on its ocean-going vessels due to regulatory marine inspections by the ABS and amortizes the costs of the shipyard over the period between drydockings, generally 30 or 60 months, depending on the type of major maintenance performed. Drydocking expenditures that extend the life or improve the operating capability of the vessel result in the costs being capitalized. The Company recognized amortization of major maintenance costs of $19,869,000, $22,126,000$23,962,000, $20,760,000 and $16,409,000$21,207,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively, in costs of sales and operating expenses. Routine repairs and maintenance on ocean-going vessels are expensed as incurred. Interest is capitalized on the construction of new ocean-going vessels. Interest expense excludes capitalized interest of $2,974,000, $3,026,000$1,003,000, $2,206,000 and $639,000$1,731,000 for the years ending December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.




Environmental Liabilities. The Company expenses costs related to environmental events as they are incurred or when a loss is considered probable and estimable.



Goodwill. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in transactions accounted for as a purchase is included in goodwill. The Company conducted its annual goodwill impairment testtests at November 30, 20162019, 2018 and 2015.2017. For 20162019 and 2015,2017, there was 0 impairment of goodwill. For 2018, the Company noted noincurred an impairment of goodwill.goodwill charge of $2,702,000. The Company will continue to conduct goodwill impairment tests as of November 30 of subsequent years, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that interim impairment testing is necessary. The amount of goodwill impairment, if any, is typically measured based on projected discounted future operating cash flows using an appropriate discount rate. The gross carrying value of goodwill at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 was $615,598,000 and $604,185,000, respectively,$973,995,000, and accumulated amortization at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 was $15,566,000. Accumulated impairment losses were $1,901,000$4,603,000 at December 31, 20162019 and 2015.2018.



During the 2018 fourth quarter, the Company took a $2,702,000 charge for the impairment of the remaining goodwill recorded for Osprey Line, L.L.C., a subsidiary that transports project cargoes and cargo containers by barge on the United States inland waterway system.  The impairment reflected the reduced profitability outlook of the container-on-barge operations due to the current economic environment.  The fair value was determined using a combination of a discounted cash flow methodology and a market based approach utilizing a net earnings before interest expense, taxes on income, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) multiplier.


Net goodwill for the marine transportation segment was $382,227,000 and $381,243,000$405,575,000 at December 31, 20162019 and 2015, respectively. The increase in net goodwill for the marine transportation segment was due to the purchase of an inland tank barge fleet in 2016 which is more fully described in Note 2, Acquisitions.2018. Net goodwill for the diesel enginedistribution and services segment was $215,904,000 and $205,475,000$548,251,000 at December 31, 20162019 and 2015, respectively. The increase2018.


Other Intangibles. Other intangibles include assets for favorable contracts and customer relationships, distributorship and dealership agreements, trade names and noncompete agreements and liabilities for unfavorable leases and contracts. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the gross carrying amounts of other intangible assets were $332,656,000 and $326,984,000, respectively, and the accumulated amortization was $121,974,000 and $102,787,000, respectively, resulting in net goodwill forcarrying amounts of $210,682,000 and $224,197,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the diesel engine services segmentgross carrying amounts of other intangible liabilities were $13,860,000 and $18,323,000 respectively, and the accumulated amortization was mainly$7,956,000 and $8,652,000, respectively, resulting in net carrying amounts of $5,904,000 and $9,671,000, respectively. The decrease in intangible liabilities was primarily due to the acquisitionadoption of an engine supplyAccounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”) on January 1, 2019 and repair businessthe resulting reclassification of unfavorable leases to operating lease right-of-use assets.



The costs of intangible assets and liabilities are amortized to expense in 2016, also more fully described in Note 2, Acquisitions.a systematic and rational manner over their estimated useful lives.



For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the amortization expense for intangibles was $15,040,000, $16,760,000 and $11,296,000, respectively. Estimated net amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets and liabilities for the next five years (2020 – 2024) is approximately $16,358,000, $17,392,000, $16,989,000, $17,527,000 and $18,092,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the weighted average amortization period for intangible assets and liabilities was approximately 13 years.


Revenue Recognition. The majority of marine transportation revenue is derived from term contracts, ranging from one to fivethree years, some of which have renewal options, and the remainder is from spot market movements. The majority of the term contracts are for terms of one year. The Company is a provider of marine transportation services for its customers and, in almost all cases, does not assume ownership of the products it transports. A term contract is an agreement with a specific customer to transport cargo from a designated origin to a designated destination at a set rate or at a daily rate. The rate may or may not escalate during the term of the contract, however, the base rate generally remains constant and contracts often include escalation provisions to recover changes in specific costs such as fuel. A spot contract is an agreement with a customer to move cargo from a specific origin to a designated destination for a rate negotiated at the time the cargo movement takes place. Spot contract rates are at the current “market” rate, including fuel, and are subject to market volatility. The Company uses a voyage accounting method of revenue recognition for its marine transportation revenues which allocates voyage revenue based on the percent of the voyage completed during the period. ThereThe performance of the service is no difference ininvoiced as the recognition of revenue between a term contracttransaction occurs and a spot contract.payment is required depending on each specific customer’s credit.


Diesel engine service

Distribution products and services are generally sold based upon purchase orders or preferential service agreements with the customer that include fixed or determinable prices and that do not include right of return or significant post-delivery performance obligations. Diesel engine partsprices. Parts sales are recognized when control transfers to the customer, generally when title passes upon shipment to customers or when customer-specific acceptance requirements are met.customers. Service revenue is recognized over time as the service is provided. Dieselprovided using measures of progress utilizing hours worked or costs incurred as a percentage of estimated hours or expected costs. Revenue from rental agreements is recognized on a straight-line basis over the rental period. The Company recognizes the revenues on contract manufacturing activities upon shipment and transfer of control to the customer. The transactions in the distribution and services segment are typically invoiced as parts are shipped or upon the completion of the service job.  Contract manufacturing activities are generally invoiced upon shipment and the Company will often get deposits from its customers prior to starting work, or progress payments during the project depending on the credit worthiness of the customer and the size of the project.  During 2017, prior to the adoption of ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09” or “ASC 606”), distribution and services manufacturing and assembly projects revenue iswas reported on the percentage of completion method of accounting using measurements of progress towards completion appropriate for the work performed.

Stock-Based Compensation. The Company has share-based compensation plans covering selected officers and other key employees as well as the Company’s Board of Directors. Stock-based grants made under the Company’s stock plans are recorded at fair value on the date of the grant and the cost for all grants made under the director plan and for grants made under the employee plan prior to February 19, 2018 is recognized ratably over the vesting period of the stock option or restricted stock.  On February 19, 2018, the employee stock award plan was amended to also allow for the granting of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to selected officers and other key employees. The amendment included a provision for the continued vesting of unvested stock options and RSUs for employees who meet certain years of service and age requirements at the time of their retirement. The vesting change resulted in shorter expense accrual periods on stock options and RSUs granted after February 19, 2018 to employees who are nearing retirement and meet the service and age requirements.  Stock option grants are valued at the date of grant as calculated under the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur.The Company’s stock-based compensation plans are more fully described in Note 8,10, Stock Award Plans.



Taxes on Income. The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.



Accrued Insurance. Accrued insurance liabilities include estimates based on individual incurred claims outstanding and an estimated amount for losses incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) or fully developed based on past experience. Insurance premiums, IBNR losses and incurred claim losses, in excess of the Company’s deductible for 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 were $23,085,000, $23,737,000$32,372,000, $29,306,000 and $25,416,000,$26,195,000, respectively.


Noncontrolling Interests. The Company has a majority interest in and is the general partner in several affiliated entities. In situations where losses applicable to the minority interest in the affiliated entities exceed the limited partners’ equity capital, such excess and any further loss attributable to the minority interest is charged against the Company’s interest in the affiliated entities. If future earnings materialize in the respective affiliated entities, the Company’s interest would be credited to the extent of any losses previously absorbed.

Treasury Stock. The Company follows the average cost method of accounting for treasury stock transactions.



Impairment of Long-LivedLong-lived Assets and for Long-LivedLong-lived Assets to Be Disposed Of. The Company reviews long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles for impairment by vessel class whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable.


Recoverability on marine transportation assets is assessed based on vessel classes, not on individual assets, because identifiable cash flows for individual marine transportation assets are not available. Projecting customer contract volumes allows estimation of future cash flows by projecting pricing and utilization by vessel class but it is not practical to project which individual marine transportation asset will be utilized for any given contract. Because customers do not specify which particular vessel is used, prices are quoted based on vessel classes not individual assets. Nominations of vessels for specific jobs are determined on a day by day basis and are a function of the equipment class required and the geographic position of vessels within that class at that particular time as vessels within a class are interchangeable and provide the same service. The Company’s vessels are mobile assets and equipped to operate in geographic regions throughout the United States and the Company has in the past and expects to continue to move vessels from one region to another when it is necessary due to changing markets and it is economical to do so. Barge vessel classes are based on similar capacities, hull type, and type of product and towing vessels are based on similar hull type and horsepower. Recoverability of the vessel classes is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

Accounting Standards



In August 2016,December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”)for Income Taxes” which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to create consistencythe general principles in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15Topic 740, Income Taxes.  The guidance is effective for annualfiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017.2020.  Early adoption is permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact on its consolidated financial statements.



In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans – General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans” which amends the annual disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans by removing certain requirements, providing clarification on existing requirements and adding new requirements including adding an explanation of the reasons for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit obligation for the period. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this update are required to be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact on its disclosures.


In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU 2017-04”) which simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 in the goodwill impairment test that required an entity to perform procedures to determine the fair value of its assets and liabilities at the testing date. An entity instead will perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value and record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. ASU 2017-04 will be applied prospectively and is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests conducted in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.


In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”) which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, forfeitures, minimum statutory tax withholding requirements, classification as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company will adopt the provisions of ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017 and the Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-09 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. However, the adoption will result in some income statement volatility in 2017 and beyond due to the requirement that the tax effects of exercised or vested equity awards be recognized as discrete items in income tax expense or benefit in the income statement in the reporting period in which they occur.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”) to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements.  The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 is effectiveon January 1, 2019 under the optional transition method that allows for annuala cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective approach is required. will not restate prior periods. The Company has formed a project team to evaluatealso elected certain practical expedients permitted under the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures. The project team has completed training on the new standard and has started lease review and documentation, buttransition guidance which allowed the Company has not yet determinedto carryforward its historical lease classification and for the effectnon-recognition of short-term leases. Adoption of ASU 2016-02 on its ongoing financial reporting.

In November 2015,resulted in the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classificationrecognition of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”) which requires that deferred taxoperating lease right-of-use assets for operating leases of $168,149,000 and lease liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrentfor operating leases of $175,778,000 on the balance sheet. The current requirement that deferred tax liabilities and assetsCompany’s Condensed Balance Sheets as of a tax-paying componentJanuary 1, 2019, with no material impact to the Condensed Statements of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not affected by this guidance. ASU 2015-17 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016 but early application is permitted and the guidance may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assetsEarnings or retrospectively to all periods presented.Cash Flows. The Company will adopt the provisionsdid not have any financing leases as of ASU 2015-17 on January 1, 2017 and the Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-17 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.2019. See Note 2, Leases for additional information.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015-11”) which applies to inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) or average cost. Under the guidance, an entity should measure inventory that is within the scope of this update at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and should be applied prospectively with early adoption permitted at the beginning of an interim period or annual reporting period.  The Company will adopt the provisions of ASU 2015-11 on January 1, 2017 and the Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-11 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the associated debt liability. Effective January 1, 2016, the Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 and prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. The December 31, 2015 net debt issuance costs of $3,985,000 have been reclassified in the consolidated balance sheet from other assets to long-term debt, less current portion.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40):  Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU 2014-15”), which provides guidance about management's responsibility in evaluating whether there is substantial doubt relating to an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures as applicable.  Adoption of ASU 2014-15 as of December 31, 2016 did not impact the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”).2014-09.  ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 will replacereplaced most existing revenue recognition guidance in United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles when it becomes effective. In July 2015, the FASB voted to delay the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year, making itgenerally accepted accounting principles and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.2017. ASU 2014-09 permits the use of either the retrospective, modified retrospective or prospective with a cumulative catch-up approach. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 on January 1, 2018 under the modified retrospective approach with a cumulative adjustment that decreased the opening balance of retained earnings by $9,722,000. Prior period amounts were not adjusted and the prior period amounts continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. The cumulative adjustment primarily relates to recognition of revenue on certain contract manufacturing activities, primarily construction of new pressure pumping units in the Company’s distribution and services segment. The Company previously recognized revenue on manufacturing and assembly projects on a percentage of completion method using measurements of progress towards completion appropriate for the work performed. Upon the adoption of ASU 2014-09, the Company recognizes the revenues on contract manufacturing activities upon shipment and transfer of control versus the percentage of completion method.


The following table summarizes the financial statement line items within the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements impacted by ASU 2014-09 for the year ended December 31, 2018 (in thousands):


  2018 
  As Reported  
Balances
without
Adoption of
ASC 606
  
Effect of
Change
 
Statements of earnings:         
Distribution and services revenues $1,487,554  $1,515,554  $(28,000)
Costs of sales and operating expenses $2,160,946  $2,181,046  $(20,100)
Operating income $155,289  $163,189  $(7,900)
Earnings before taxes on income $114,159  $122,059  $(7,900)
Provision for taxes on income $(35,081) $(37,187) $2,106 
Net earnings attributable to Kirby $78,452  $84,246  $(5,794)
             
Statements of comprehensive income:            
Net earnings $79,078  $84,872  $(5,794)
Comprehensive income attributable to Kirby $77,346  $83,140  $(5,794)
             
Statements of cash flows:            
Net earnings $79,078  $84,872  $(5,794)
Provision for deferred income taxes $34,881  $32,775  $2,106 
Decrease in cash flows resulting from changes in:            
Accounts receivable $12,511  $(71,624) $84,135 
Inventory $(144,685) $(71,985) $(72,700)
Accrued and other liabilities $30,712  $38,459  $(7,747)




(2) Leases


The Company currently leases various facilities and equipment under cancelable and noncancelable operating leases. The accounting for the Company’s leases may require judgments, which include determining whether a contract contains a lease, the allocation between lease and non-lease components, and determining the incremental borrowing rates. Leases with an initial noncancelable term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet and the related lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company has formed a project teamalso elected to evaluatecombine lease and non-lease components on all classes of leased assets, except for leased towing vessels for which the standardCompany estimates approximately 75% of the costs relate to service costs and determine the effectother non-lease components. Variable lease costs relate primarily to real estate executory costs (i.e. taxes, insurance and maintenance).



Future minimum lease payments under operating leases that ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The project team has completed traininginitial noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year at December 31, 2019 were as follows (in thousands):



   
2020 $33,374 
2021  25,911 
2022  23,098 
2023  19,162 
2024  15,330 
Thereafter  92,991 
Total lease payments  209,866 
Less: imputed interest  (43,085)
Operating lease liabilities $166,781 



As of December 31, 2018, future total rentals on the new standardCompany’s noncancelable operating leases were $278,602,000 in the aggregate, which consisted of the following: $97,091,000 in 2019; $30,062,000 in 2020; $21,818,000 in 2021; $20,263,000 in 2022; $17,429,000 in 2023; and has started$91,939,000 thereafter.



The following table summarizes lease cost for the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands):


Operating lease cost $39,064 
Variable lease cost  2,326 
Short-term lease cost  31,340 
Sublease income  (420)
Total lease cost $72,310 



The following table summarizes other supplemental information about the Company’s operating leases as of December 31, 2019:


Weighted average discount rate4.0%
Weighted average remaining lease term11 years


(3)  Revenues


The following table sets forth the Company’s revenues by major source for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):


 2019  2018  2017 
Marine transportation segment:         
Inland transportation $1,220,878  $1,119,820  $923,916 
Coastal transportation  366,204   363,323   400,190 
  $1,587,082  $1,483,143  $1,324,106 

Distribution and services segment:         
Oil and gas $659,364  $1,010,410  $614,128 
Commercial and industrial  591,953   477,144   276,184 
  $1,251,317  $1,487,554  $890,312 


The Company’s revenue is measured based on consideration specified in its contracts with its customers. The Company recognizes revenue as it satisfies performance obligations in its contracts which occur as the Company delivers a service over time to its customers, or transfers control over a part or product to its customer.


Contract Assets and Liabilities. Contract liabilities represent advance consideration received from customers, and are recognized as revenue over time as the related performance obligation is satisfied. The amount of revenue recognized in 2019 that was included in the December 31, 2018 contract review and documentation.liability balance was $76,412,000. The Company has recognized all contract liabilities within the deferred revenues financial statement caption on the balance sheet.  The Company did not have any contract assets at December 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018.


Performance Obligations. The Company applies the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-50-14(a) and does not yet selected a transition method nor has it determineddisclose information about remaining performance obligations that have original expected durations of one year or less.

(4) Acquisitions


During the effect of ASU 2014-09 on its ongoing financial reporting.

(2) ACQUISITIONS

On October 11, 2016,year ended December 31, 2019, the Company purchased, certain assetsfrom various counterparties, a barge fleeting operation in Lake Charles, Louisiana and 9 inland tank barges from leasing companies for an aggregate of Valley Power Systems, Inc. and Valley Power Systems Northwest, Inc. (collectively “VPS”) for $11,440,000$17,991,000 in cash. The Company had been leasing the barges prior to the purchases.


On March 14, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of the marine transportation fleet of Cenac Marine Services, LLC (“Cenac”) for $244,500,000 in cash. Cenac’s fleet consisted of 63 inland 30,000 barrel tank barges with approximately 1,833,000 barrels of capacity, 34 inland towboats and 2 offshore tugboats. Cenac transported petrochemicals, refined products and black oil, including crude oil, residual fuels, feedstocks and lubricants on the lower Mississippi River, its tributaries, and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway for major oil companies and refiners. The average age of the inland tank barges was approximately five years and the inland towboats had an average age of approximately seven years.


The Company considers Cenac to be a natural extension of the current marine transportation segment, expanding the capabilities of the Company’s inland based marine transportation business and lowering the average age of its inland tank barge and towboat fleet.


The fair values of the assets purchased are mainlyacquired and liabilities assumed recorded at the acquisition date were as follows (in thousands):

Assets:   
Prepaid expenses $1,138 
Property and equipment  247,122 
Other intangibles  340 
Total assets $248,600 
     
Other long-term liabilities  4,100 
Net assets acquired $244,500 


The Company acquired intangible assets with an amortization period of two years and incurred long-term intangible liabilities related to the EMD Power Products (“EMD”) engine supply and repair business of VPS and include an EMD distributor agreement to sell engines in nine western states.  As a result of the acquisition, the Company recorded $8,330,000 of goodwill and $2,070,000 of intangiblesunfavorable contracts with a weighted average amortization period of approximately 151.3 years. The Company expects allAcquisition related costs of the goodwill$442,000, consisting primarily of legal and other professional fees, were expensed as incurred to be deductible for tax purposes.selling, general and administrative expense in 2019.



On June 30, 2016,December 28, 2018, the Company purchased an 80,000 barrel coastal3 inland tank bargebarges from TD Equipment Finance, Inc. (“TD Equipment”)a leasing company for $13,682,000$3,120,000 in cash.  The Company had been leasing the barge from TD Equipmentbarges prior to itsthe purchase.



On June 2, 2016,December 14, 2018, the Company purchased four coastal tugboats27 inland tank barges with a barrel capacity of 306,000 barrels from Crosby Marine TransportationCGBM 100, LLC for $26,450,000$28,500,000 in cash.  The four coastal tugboats have an average age of 13 years.

On April 15, 2016, the Company purchased the inland tank barge fleet of SEACOR Holdings Inc. (“Seacor”) from subsidiaries of Seacor for a total value of $89,181,000. The assets purchased consisted of 27 inland 30,000 barrel tank barges transport petrochemicals and 14 inland towboats.  The purchase price was comprised of $85,500,000 in cashrefined products on the Mississippi River System and the transfer to Seacor of a Florida-based ship docking tugboat with a value of $3,681,000.Gulf Intracoastal Waterway.  The average age of the 27barges was eight years.


On November 30, 2018, the Company purchased an inland towboat from a leasing company for $3,050,000 in cash. The Company had been leasing the towboat prior to the purchase.


On May 10, 2018, the Company completed the purchase of Targa Resources Corp.’s (“Targa”) inland tank barge business from a subsidiary of Targa for $69,250,000 in cash. Targa’s inland tank barge fleet consisted of 16 pressure barges was ten years. Seacor, through its subsidiary, SCF Waxler Marine LLC, transported refined petroleum products,with a total capacity of 258,000 barrels, many of which were under multi-year contracts that the Company assumed from Targa. The 16 tank barges transport petrochemicals and black oil on the Mississippi River System and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. As a result of the acquisition, the Company recorded $985,000$16,116,000 of goodwill and $11,000,000 of intangibles with an average amortization period of 15 years. The Company expects all of the goodwill to be deductible for tax purposes. No intangibles


On March 15, 2018, the Company purchased 2 inland pressure tank barges from a competitor for $10,400,000 in cash. The average age of the 2 tank barges was five years.


On February 14, 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of Higman Marine, Inc. (“Higman”) for $421,922,000 in cash. Higman’s fleet consisted of 163 inland tank barges with 4.8 million barrels of capacity, and 75 inland towboats, transporting petrochemicals, black oil, including crude oil and natural gas condensate, and refined petroleum products on the Mississippi River System and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The average age of the inland tank barges was approximately seven years and the inland towboats had an average age of approximately eight years. Financing of the acquisition was through the issuance of the 2028 Notes (as defined in Note 8, Long-Term Debt) issued on February 12, 2018 in preparation for closing of the acquisition.


The Company considers Higman to be a natural extension of the current marine transportation segment, expanding the capabilities of the Company’s inland based marine transportation business and lowering the average age of its inland tank barge and towboat fleet.



The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded at the acquisition date were as follows (in thousands):


Assets:   
Cash $2,313 
Accounts receivable  27,527 
Prepaid expenses  5,323 
Property and equipment  497,951 
Goodwill  4,657 
Other assets  30 
Total assets $537,801 
Liabilities:    
Accounts payable  17,012 
Accrued liabilities  14,127 
Deferred income taxes  40,524 
Other long-term liabilities  44,216 
Total liabilities $115,879 
Net assets acquired $421,922 


As a result of the acquisition, the Company recorded $4,657,000 of goodwill of which the majority will be deductible for tax purposes. The Company also incurred $11,100,000 of intangible liabilities related to unfavorable contracts with a weighted average amortization period of approximately 4.9 years. Acquisition related costs of $3,464,000, consisting primarily of legal, audit and other than goodwillprofessional fees plus other expenses, were identifiedexpensed as incurred to selling, general and administrative expense in 2018.



On October 20, 2017, San Jac Marine, LLC (“San Jac”), a subsidiary of the Company, purchased certain assets of Sneed Shipbuilding, Inc. for $14,852,000 in cash including its Channelview, Texas shipyard. San Jac is a builder of marine vessels for both inland and offshore applications and a provider of repair and maintenance services. The Company intends to build towboats at the shipyard and use the facilities for routine maintenance.


On September 13, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Stewart & Stevenson LLC (“S&S”), a global manufacturer and distributor of products and services for the oil and gas, marine, construction, power generation, transportation, mining and agricultural industries. The acquired business, which the Company operates through a newly formed subsidiary renamed Stewart & Stevenson LLC after the closing of the acquisition, was founded in 1902 and serves domestic and global markets with equipment, rental solutions, parts and service through a strategic network of sales and service centers in domestic and international locations.


The total value of the transaction was $758,213,000 consisting of cash consideration of $377,935,000, the assumption of $13,724,000 of debt and $366,554,000 through the issuance of 5,696,259 shares of Company common stock valued at $64.35 per share, the Company’s closing share price on September 13, 2017. The debt assumed consisted of $12,135,000 of term debt and $1,589,000 of short-term secured loans related to the Company’s South American operations. The term debt was paid off without penalty in the acquisition.2017 fourth quarter.


Pro
S&S is a distributor in certain geographic areas for Allison Transmission, MTU, Detroit Diesel, EMD Power Products (“EMD”), Deutz and several other manufacturers. S&S’ principal customers are oilfield service companies, oil and gas operators and producers, and companies in the marine, mining, power generation, on-highway and other commercial and industrial applications.


On July 10, 2017, the Company completed the purchase of certain inland marine assets from an undisclosed competitor for $68,000,000 in cash. The assets purchased consisted of 9 specialty pressure tank barges, 4 30,000 barrel tank barges and 3 1320 horsepower inland towboats. The average age of the 13 inland tank barges was five years. The 13 tank barges transport petrochemicals and refined petroleum products on the Mississippi River System and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. As a result of the acquisition, the Company recorded $67,970,000 of property and $30,000 of intangibles with a weighted average amortization period of two years.


During July 2017, the Company purchased 4 inland tank barges for $1,450,000 as well as a barge fleeting and marine fueling operation business in Freeport, Texas for $3,900,000. The Company had been leasing the barges prior to the purchase.


The following unaudited pro forma results present consolidated information as if the S&S acquisition had been completed as of January 1, 2017. The pro forma results do not include any of the other acquisitions madecompleted in 2016 have not been presented2017 through 2019 described above as the pro forma revenues, earnings before taxes on income, net earnings and net earnings per shareeffect of these acquisitions would not be materially different from the Company’s actual results.


The pro forma results include the amortization associated with the acquired intangible assets, interest expense associated with the debt used to fund a portion of the acquisition, the impact of the additional shares issued in connection with the S&S acquisition, and the impact of certain fair value adjustments such as depreciation adjustments related to adjustments to property and equipment. The pro forma results do not include any cost savings or potential synergies related to the acquisition nor any integration costs. The pro forma results should not be considered indicative of the results of operations or financial position of the combined companies had the acquisitions had been consummated as of January 1, 2017 and are not necessarily indicative of results of future operations of the Company.


The following table sets forth the Company’s pro forma revenues and net earnings attributable to Kirby for the year ended December 31, 2017 (unaudited and in thousands):

Revenues $2,556,131 
Net earnings attributable to Kirby $303,097 

(3)
(5) Impairment of Long-lived Assets


During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recorded a $82,705,000 non-cash pre-tax impairment charge. The after-tax effect of the charge was $65,337,000 or $1.09 per share. The USCG adopted regulations on ballast water management systems (“BWMS”) establishing a standard for the allowable concentration of living organisms in certain vessel ballast water discharged in waters of the United States under the National Invasive Species Act.  The regulations include requirements for the installation of engineering equipment to treat ballast water by establishing an approval process for BWMS.  The USCG has approved manufacturers’ systems that met the regulatory discharge standard equivalent to the International Maritime Organization’s D-2 standard.  The phase-in schedule for those existing vessels requiring a system to install BWMS equipment is dependent on vessel build date, ballast water capacity, and drydock schedule.  Compliance with the ballast water treatment regulations requires the installation of equipment on some of the Company’s vessels to treat ballast water before it is discharged. The installation of BWMS equipment will require significant capital expenditures at the next scheduled drydocking to complete the installation of the approved system on those existing vessels that require a system to comply with the BWMS regulations.


Due to the advanced age of four of the Company’s older articulated tank barge and tugboat units (“ATBs”) and the high cost of installation of BWMS, the Company will retire the ATBs at their next scheduled shipyard dates which range between 2020 and 2023 instead of installing the expensive BWMS equipment required to operate the vessels past their next required shipyard dates.  A pre-tax impairment charge of $78,835,000 was incurred in the fourth quarter of 2018 to reduce the ATBs to a fair value of $13,247,000 due to reduced estimated cash flows resulting from reduced lives on these 4 older ATBs.  The reduced estimated useful lives are due to the assessment of the impact of the new regulations by USCG that require the installation of BWMS. The fair value of the 4 ATBs of $13,247,000 is presented in marine transportation equipment at December 31, 2018.


The impairment charge also included a pre-tax charge of $3,870,000 as the Company reduced the carrying value of its improvements in a leased barge to its scrap value of $220,000.  As part of a lease termination, the Company agreed to terminate the lease, purchase the barge and then scrap the barge which resulted in the Company committing to put the barge up for sale in December 2018.    The barge was scrapped in January 2019.  The fair market value of the barge was $220,000 at December 31, 2018, and was presented in prepaid expenses and other current assets.  In addition, the Company incurred $2,403,000 in lease cancellation costs in December 2018 related to the leased barge.


During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company recorded a $105,712,000 non-cash pre-tax impairment charge. The after-tax effect of the charge was $66,975,000 or $1.20 per share. The impairment charge was to reduce certain vessels to a fair value of $12,550,000 as the Company decided to put certain older out-of-service vessels up for sale in its marine transportation segment in response to lower equipment utilization, pricing pressure and expensive BWMS installations required in the next few years on some of the coastal tank barges. Retiring some of the older coastal marine vessels reduces the fleet’s age profile and improves the efficiency of the fleet.  The fair market value of the vessels was $12,550,000 at December 31, 2017, and was presented in prepaid expenses and other current assets.

(6) Inventories



The following table presents the details of inventories as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands):


 
December 31,
2016
  
December 31,
2015
  2019  2018 
Finished goods $178,740  $163,501  $291,214  $406,364 
Work in process  6,662   21,010   60,187   101,077 
 $185,402  $184,511  $351,401  $507,441 
(4)
(7) Fair Value Measurements



The accounting guidance for using fair value to measure certain assets and liabilities establishes a three tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little, if any, market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities have carrying values that approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity
81




The fair value of the Company’s debt instruments is described in Note 5,8, Long-Term Debt.

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.  These assets are adjusted to fair value when there is evidence of impairment. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, there was no indication that the Company’s long-lived assets were impaired, and accordingly, measurement at fair value was not required.

(5)(8)  Long-Term Debt



Long-term debt at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 consisted of the following (in thousands):


 2016  2015 
Long-term debt, including current portion:       2019  2018 
$550,000,000 revolving credit facility due April 30, 2020 $225,986  $278,834 
$850,000,000 revolving credit facility due March 27, 2024 $  $417,373 
$500,000,000 term loan due March 27, 2024  375,000    
$150,000,000 senior notes Series A due February 27, 2020  150,000   150,000   150,000   150,000 
$350,000,000 senior notes Series B due February 27, 2023  350,000   350,000   350,000   350,000 
$10,000,000 credit line due June 30, 2017      
$500,000,000 senior notes due March 1, 2028  500,000   500,000 
$10,000,000 credit line due June 30, 2021      
Bank notes payable  16   19 
 $725,986  $778,834   1,375,016   1,417,392 
Unamortized debt issuance costs  (3,184)  (3,985)
Unamortized debt issuance costs (a)  (4,655)  (6,550)
Unamortized debt discount  (594)  (654)
 $722,802  $774,849  $1,369,767  $1,410,188 

74


(a) Unamortized debt issuance costs excludes $2,650,000 attributable to the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below) included in other assets at December 31, 2019.

The aggregate payments due on the long-term debt in each of the next five years were as follows (in thousands):


2017 $ 
2018   
2019   
2020  375,986  $150,016 
2021      
2022   
2023  381,250 
2024  343,750 
Thereafter  350,000   500,000 
 $725,986  $1,375,016 


The
On March 27, 2019, the Company has a $550,000,000 unsecured revolvingentered into an amended and restated credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicategroup of commercial banks, with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as the administrative agent bank, with a maturity date of April 30, 2020. In addition,that extended the credit agreement allows for a $300,000,000 increase in the aggregate commitmentsterm of the banks in the form ofCompany’s existing $850,000,000 revolving credit loans orfacility (“Revolving Credit Facility”) to March 27, 2024 and added a five-year term loans, subject to the consentloan (“Term Loan”) facility in an amount of each bank that elects to participate in the increased commitment.$500,000,000. The Credit Agreement provides for a variable interest rate spread varies with the Company’s senior debt rating and is currently 1.00% overbased on the London Interbank Offered Rateinterbank offered rate (“LIBOR”) or equal to an alternatea base rate calculated with reference to the agent bank’s prime rate, among other factors (“Alternate(the “Alternate Base Rate”). The commitment feeinterest rate varies with the Company’s credit rating and is currently 0.10%.112.5 basis points over LIBOR or 12.5 basis points over the Alternate Base Rate. The RevolvingTerm Loan is repayable in quarterly installments originally scheduled to commence June 30, 2020, in increasing percentages of the original principal amount of the loan, with the remaining unpaid balance payable of 65% of the initial amount due on March 27, 2024. During 2019, the Company repaid $125,000,000 under the Term Loan prior to the scheduled installments.  As a result, no repayments are required until September 30, 2023.  The Credit FacilityAgreement contains certain restrictive financial covenants including an interest coverage ratio and a debt-to-capitalization ratio. In addition to financial covenants, the Revolving Credit FacilityAgreement contains covenants that, subject to exceptions, restrict debt incurrence, mergers and acquisitions, sales of assets, dividends and investments, liquidations and dissolutions, capital leases, transactions with affiliates and changes in lines of business. The Credit Agreement specifies certain events of default, upon the occurrence of which the maturity of the outstanding loans may be accelerated, including the failure to pay principal or interest, violation of covenants and default on other indebtedness, among other events. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit FacilityAgreement may be used for general corporate purposes the purchase of existing or new equipment, the purchase of the Company’s common stock, or for businessincluding acquisitions. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company was in compliance with all Revolving Credit FacilityAgreement covenants and had $225,986,000 of debt0 outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility.  The average borrowingborrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility during 2016 was $249,247,000, computing by averagingand $375,000,000 outstanding under the daily balance, and the weighted averageTerm Loan. The interest rate was 1.5%, computed by dividing the interest expense under the Revolving Credit Facility by the average Revolving Credit Facility borrowing.and Term Loan was 2.9% at December 31, 2019. The Revolving Credit Facility includes a $25,000,000 commitment which may be used for standby letters of credit. Outstanding letters of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility were $2,518,000$5,258,000 as of December 31, 2016.2019.



On February 12, 2018, the Company issued $500,000,000 of 4.2% senior unsecured notes due March 1, 2028 (the “2028 Notes”) with U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. Interest payments of $10,500,000 are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1 of each year. The Company received cash proceeds of $495,019,000, net of the original issue discount of $705,000 and debt issuance costs of $4,276,000. The 2028 Notes are unsecured and rank equally in right of payment with the Company’s other unsecured senior indebtedness. The 2028 Notes contain certain covenants on the part of the Company, including covenants relating to liens, sale-leasebacks, asset sales and mergers, among others. The 2028 Notes also specify certain events of default, upon the occurrence of which the maturity of the notes may be accelerated, including failure to pay principal and interest, violation of covenants or default on other indebtedness, among others. The Company used the proceeds from the issuance of the 2028 Notes to fund the acquisition of Higman. The remaining net proceeds of the sale of the 2028 Notes were used for the repayment of indebtedness under the Company’s bank credit facilities. As of December 31, 2019, the Company was in compliance with all the 2028 Notes covenants and had $500,000,000 outstanding under the 2028 Notes.


The Company has $500,000,000 of unsecured senior notes (“Senior Notes Series A” and “Senior Notes Series B”) with a group of institutional investors, consisting of $150,000,000 of 2.72% Senior Notes Series A due February 27, 2020 and $350,000,000 of 3.29% Senior Notes Series B due February 27, 2023. No principal payments are required until maturity. The Senior Notes Series A and Series B contain certain covenants on the part of the Company, including an interest coverage covenant, a debt-to-capitalization covenant and covenants relating to liens, asset sales and mergers, among others. The Senior Notes Series A and Series B also specify certain events of default, upon the occurrence of which the maturity of the notes may be accelerated, including failure to pay principal and interest, violation of covenants or default on other indebtedness, among others. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company was in compliance with all Senior Notes Series A and Series B covenants and had $150,000,000 of Senior Notes Series A outstanding and $350,000,000 of Senior Notes Series B outstanding. The Senior Notes Series A are excluded from short term liabilities because the Company has the ability and the intent to repay the amount due using borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.



The Company has a $10,000,000 line of credit (“Credit Line”) with Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”) for short-term liquidity needs and letters of credit, with a maturity date of June 30, 2017.2021. The Credit Line allows the Company to borrow at an interest rate agreed to by Bank of America and the Company at the time each borrowing is made or continued. The Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Line as of December 31, 2016.2019. Outstanding letters of credit under the Credit Line were $1,012,000$1,171,000 as of December 31, 2016.2019.

75

On September 13, 2017, as a result of the S&S acquisition, the Company assumed $12,135,000 of term debt which was paid off without penalty in the 2017 fourth quarter.


The Company also had $16,000 of Contentsshort-term secured loans outstanding, as of December 31, 2019, related to its South American operations.


The estimated fair value of total debt outstanding at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 was $715,330,000$1,421,325,000 and $764,781,000,$1,411,628,000, respectively, which differs from the carrying amount of $722,802,000$1,369,767,000 and $774,849,000,$1,410,188,000, respectively, included in the consolidated financial statements. The fair value of debt outstanding was determined using an income approach that relies on inputs such as yield curves.a Level 2 fair value measurement.



(9)  Taxes on Income



Earnings before taxes on income and details of the provision for taxes on income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 were as follows (in thousands):


  2016  2015  2014 
Earnings before taxes on income — United States $227,746  $361,712  $454,390 
             
Provision for taxes on income:            
Federal:            
Current $28,919  $64,707  $81,953 
Deferred  49,685   59,582   72,920 
State and local  6,338   9,453   14,909 
  $84,942  $133,742  $169,782 

 2019  2018  2017 
Earnings (loss) before taxes on income:         
United States $190,839  $117,800  $74,267 
Foreign  (1,019)  (3,641)  (1,253)
  $189,820  $114,159  $73,014 
             
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income:            
U.S. Federal:            
Current $(312) $  $11,143 
Deferred  45,133   27,102   (258,703)
  $44,821  $27,102  $(247,560)
U.S. State:            
Current $76  $(243) $3,861 
Deferred  1,706   7,619   2,280 
  $1,782  $7,376  $6,141 
Foreign:            
Current $198  $443  $370 
Deferred     160   160 
  $198  $603  $530 
Consolidated:            
Current $(38) $200  $15,374 
Deferred  46,839   34,881   (256,263)
  $46,801  $35,081  $(240,889)


During the three years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the tax benefit (expense) related to the exercise of stock options and the issuance of restricted stock that were allocated directly to additional paid-in capital were $(824,000), $964,000 and $6,119,000, respectively.


The Company’s provision for taxes on income varied from the statutory federal income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 due to the following:


 2016  2015  2014  2019  2018  2017 
United States income tax statutory rate  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%  21.0%  21.0%  35.0%
State and local taxes, net of federal benefit  1.8   1.7   2.2   0.7   6.5   0.9 
Change due to U.S. tax reform        (369.0)
Other – net  .5   .3   .2   3.0   3.2   3.2 
  37.3%  37.0%  37.4%  24.7%  30.7%  (329.9)%



The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the current deferred tax assets and non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 were as follows (in thousands):


 2016  2015 
Current deferred tax assets:      
Compensated absences $739  $829 
Allowance for doubtful accounts  2,534   3,288 
Insurance accruals  6,218   4,234 
Other  4,113   3,372 
 $13,604  $11,723 
         2019  2018 
Non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities:              
Deferred tax assets:              
Postretirement health care benefits $2,234  $2,501 
Allowance for doubtful accounts $1,758  $2,105 
Inventory  13,401   5,017 
Insurance accruals  2,910   3,410   4,397   4,119 
Deferred compensation  11,124   10,534   1,109   1,291 
Unrealized loss on defined benefit plans  28,832   25,245   10,253   9,891 
Operating loss carryforwards  7,846   5,188   143,181   81,867 
Pension benefits  6,825   6,559 
Other  21,622   20,702   7,392   22,421 
  188,316   133,270 
Valuation allowances  (7,417)  (4,716)  (20,525)  (25,568)
  67,151   62,864 
          167,791   107,702 
Deferred tax liabilities:                
Property  (654,751)  (604,737)  (620,891)  (526,873)
Deferred state taxes  (54,812)  (53,542)  (63,640)  (74,638)
Pension benefits  (2,799)  (8,471)
Goodwill and other intangibles  (51,551)  (44,185)  (54,844)  (34,235)
Other  (22,295)  (21,737)  (16,620)  (14,741)
  (786,208)  (732,672)  (755,995)  (650,487)
 $(719,057) $(669,808) $(588,204) $(542,785)



During 2019, the Company generated a net operating loss mainly caused by taking the full cost deduction of purchased fixed assets. The deferred tax assets of $117,134,000 has been recorded at December 31, 2019 and can be utilized by future taxable income indefinitely.



The Company has determined that it is more likely than not that all federalhad state operating loss deferred tax assets at December 31, 2016 will be realized, including its operating loss carryforwards of $429,000 that expire$17,282,000 in various amounts through 2030.

2019 and $19,039,000 in 2018. The valuation allowance for state deferred tax assets as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 was $7,417,000$11,760,000 and $4,716,000,$17,027,000, respectively, related to the Company’s state net operating loss carryforwards based on the Company’s determination that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Expiration of these state net operating loss carryforwards vary by state through 20362037 and none will expire in fiscal 2017. Total deferred tax assets were $88,172,000 and $79,303,000 as2020.


As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Total deferred tax assets,2019, the Company had a Canadian net operating loss carryforward of $8,765,000 which expires in 2038. A full valuation allowances, were $80,755,000 and $74,587,000 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.allowance has been provided for this asset.



The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the 20132016 through 20152018 tax years. With few exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries’ state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the 20102013 through 20152018 tax years.



As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company has provided a liability of $2,573,000$1,172,000 for unrecognized tax benefits related to various income tax issues which includes interest and penalties. The amount that would impact the Company’s effective tax rate, if recognized, is $1,737,000,$960,000, with the difference between the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits and the amount that would impact the effective tax rate being primarily related to the federal tax benefit of state income tax items. It is not reasonably possible to determine if the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change prior to December 31, 20172020 due to the uncertainty of possible examination results.



A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, is as follows (in thousands):


 2016  2015  2014  2019  2018  2017 
Balance at beginning of year $1,958  $1,171  $949  $1,443  $1,787  $2,019 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year  187   339   470   51   254   403 
Additions for tax positions of prior years  867   785   39   58   70   273 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years  (441)  (337)  (287)  (669)  (668)  (908)
Settlements  (552)      
Balance at end of year $2,019  $1,958  $1,171  $883  $1,443  $1,787 



The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of its provision for federal and state income taxes. The Company recognized net benefit of $71,000 and $209,000 in interest and penalties for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and net expense of $88,000, $216,000 and $40,000$120,000 in interest and penalties for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.2017. The Company had $554,000, $522,000$289,000, $466,000 and $306,000$675,000 of accrued liabilities for the payment of interest and penalties at December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.

(7) Leases

The Company and its subsidiaries currently lease various facilities and equipment under a number of cancelable and noncancelable operating leases. Lease agreements for barges have terms from one to 12 years expiring at various dates through 2023. Lease agreements for towing vessels chartered by the Company have terms from 30 days to five years expiring at various dates through 2019; however, approximately half of the towing vessel charter agreements are for terms of one year or less. Total rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was as follows (in thousands):

  2016  2015  2014 
Rental expense:         
Marine equipment — barges $13,791  $14,092  $19,780 
Marine equipment — towing vessels  137,609   143,067   136,331 
Other buildings and equipment  11,182   9,383   9,146 
Rental expense $162,582  $166,542  $165,257 

Future minimum lease payments under operating leases that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year at December 31, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):

  
Land,
Buildings
  Marine Equipment    
  
And
Equipment
  Barges  
Towing
Vessels
  Total 
2017 $12,027  $10,419  $83,949  $106,395 
2018  11,049   8,718   20,532   40,299 
2019  8,829   4,581   314   13,724 
2020  7,508   3,813      11,321 
2021  7,007   1,574      8,581 
Thereafter  74,390   2,474      76,864 
  $120,810  $31,579  $104,795  $257,184 

(8)(10) Stock Award Plans



The Company has share-based compensation plans which are described below. The compensation cost that has been charged against earnings for the Company’s stock award plans and the income tax benefit recognized in the statement of earnings for stock awards for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 were as follows (in thousands):


  2016  2015  2014 
Compensation cost $11,675  $11,104  $11,591 
Income tax benefit $4,378  $4,120  $4,358 



 2019  2018  2017 
Compensation cost $13,612  $19,104  $11,460 
Income tax benefit $3,368  $5,903  $4,333 


The Company has an employee stock award plan for selected officers and other key employees which provides for the issuance of stock options, restricted stock awards and performance awards. On February 19, 2018, the employee stock award plan was amended to also allow for the granting of RSUs to selected officers and other key employees. Restricted stock and RSUs generally vest ratably over five years, however, the amendment included a provision for the continued vesting of unvested stock options and RSUs for employees who meet certain years of service and age requirements at the time of their retirement. The vesting change resulted in shorter expense accrual periods on stock options and RSUs granted after February 19, 2018 to employees who are nearing retirement and meet the service and age requirements.



The exercise price for each option equals the fair market value per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Substantially all stock options outstanding under the plan have terms of seven years and vest ratably over three years. No performance awards payable in stock have been awarded under the plan. At December 31, 2016, 1,987,5122019, 1,356,969 shares were available for future grants under the employee plan and no0 outstanding stock options under the employee plan were issued with stock appreciation rights.



The following is a summary of the stock option activity under the employee plan described above for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:2019:


  
Outstanding
Non-
Qualified or
Nonincentive
Stock
Awards
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2013  379,604  $55.42 
Granted  75,204  $98.91 
Exercised  (119,276) $42.07 
Canceled or expired  (12,576) $68.89 
Outstanding at December 31, 2014  322,956  $69.95 
Granted  114,894  $74.99 
Exercised    $ 
Canceled or expired  (7,418) $86.28 
Outstanding at December 31, 2015  430,432  $71.01 
Granted  186,706  $53.50 
Exercised    $ 
Canceled or expired  (16,017) $80.17 
Outstanding at December 31, 2016  601,121  $65.33 

Under the employee plan, stock options exercisable were 321,942, 239,518 and 157,140 at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 
Outstanding
Non-
Qualified or
Nonincentive
Stock
Awards
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  464,702  $69.85 
Granted  114,429  $74.57 
Exercised  (74,825) $64.83 
Canceled or expired  (18,247) $72.17 
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  486,059  $71.65 



The following table summarizes information about the Company’s outstanding and exercisable stock options under the employee plan at December 31, 2016:2019:


  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise
Prices
Range of Exercise
Prices
  
Number
Outstanding
 ��
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  
Aggregated
Intrinsic
Value
 
Number
Exercisable
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  
Aggregated
Intrinsic
Value
Range of Exercise
Prices
  
Number
Outstanding
  
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Aggregated
Intrinsic
Value
 
Number
Exercisable
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Aggregated
Intrinsic
Value
$31.35 – $36.35   16,910   0.1  $32.82    16,910  $32.82   51.23   69,254   2.8  $51.23    69,254  $51.23   
$46.74 – $51.23   212,335   4.8  $50.03    56,629  $46.74   64.65 – $68.50   97,716   4.4  $67.31    44,171  $68.43   
$64.89 – $74.99   302,735   4.1  $70.29    202,309  $69.51   70.65 – $75.50   275,103   4.8  $74.69    93,985  $74.94   
$93.64 – $96.85   33,987   4.1  $94.31    22,658  $94.31   84.90 – $101.46   43,986   1.8  $94.38    37,281  $96.08   
$101.46 – $104.37   35,154   4.2  $102.60    23,436  $102.60 51.23 – $101.46   486,059   4.2  $71.65 $8,936,000  244,691  $70.28 $4,955,000
$31.35 – $104.37   601,121   4.2  $65.33 $4,175,000  321,942  $67.73 $1,747,000



The following is a summary of the restricted stock award activity under the employee plan described above for the year ended December 31, 2019:


 
Unvested
Restricted
Stock Award
Shares
  
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2018  214,216  $64.73 
Vested  (62,748) $68.28 
Forfeited  (16,799) $63.10 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2019  134,669  $63.28 


NaN restricted stock awards were granted under the employee plan during 2019 or 2018.  The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted under the employee plan for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $68.50.



The following is a summary of RSU activity under the employee plan described above for the year ended December 31, 2019:


 Unvested RSUs  
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Unit
 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2018  141,055  $75.59 
Granted  146,650  $74.46 
Vested  (25,484) $75.60 
Forfeited  (7,054) $74.93 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2019  255,167  $74.96 


The weighted average grant date fair value of RSUs granted for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019 and 2014:2018 was $74.46 and $75.59, respectively.  NaN RSUs were granted during 2017.


  
Unvested
Restricted
Stock Award
Shares
  
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2013  399,278  $54.92 
Granted  97,706  $97.46 
Vested  (141,870) $45.64 
Forfeited  (33,661) $63.56 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2014  321,453  $71.04 
Granted  122,740  $75.04 
Vested  (113,958) $60.73 
Forfeited  (18,508) $82.00 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2015  311,727  $75.73 
Granted  190,610  $53.56 
Vested  (105,109) $69.93 
Forfeited  (19,573) $76.06 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2016  377,655  $66.14 



The Company has a stock award plan for nonemployee directors of the Company which provides for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock. The director plan provides for automatic grants of restricted stock to nonemployee directors after each annual meeting of stockholders. In addition, the director plan allows for the issuance of stock options or restricted stock in lieu of cash for all or part of the annual director fee at the option of the director. The exercise prices for all options granted under the plan are equal to the fair market value per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The terms of the options are ten years. The restricted stock issued after each annual meeting of stockholders vests six months after the date of grant. Options granted and restricted stock issued in lieu of cash director fees vest in equal quarterly increments during the year to which they relate. At December 31, 2016, 522,4572019, 461,133 shares were available for future grants under the director plan. The director stock award plan is intended as an incentive to attract and retain qualified independent directors.



The following is a summary of the stock option activity under the director plan described above for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:2019:


  
Outstanding
Non-
Qualified or
Nonincentive
Stock
Awards
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2013  320,322  $50.64 
Granted  42,000  $99.52 
Exercised  (63,988) $39.08 
Outstanding at December 31, 2014  298,334  $60.01 
Exercised  (77,905) $47.65 
Outstanding at December 31, 2015  220,429  $64.37 
Exercised  (9,000) $35.72 
Canceled or expired  (6,000) $99.52 
Outstanding at December 31, 2016  205,429  $64.60 

 
Outstanding
Non-
Qualified or
Nonincentive
Stock
Awards
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  131,104  $70.14 
Granted  2,652  $84.90 
Exercised  (18,000) $49.51 
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  115,756  $73.68 


Under the director plan, options exercisable were 205,429, 220,429 and 298,334 at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.


The following table summarizes information about the Company’s outstanding and exercisable stock options under the director plan at December 31, 2016:2019:


  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable 
  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise
Prices
Range of Exercise
Prices
  
Number
Outstanding
  
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Number
Exercisable
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Range of Exercise
Prices
  
Number
Outstanding
  
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Number
Exercisable
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$29.60 – $36.82   21,000   0.9  $32.69     21,000  $32.69    41.24 – $56.45   25,276   0.8  $49.23    25,276  $49.23   
$41.24 – $56.45   71,276   2.7  $52.34     71,276  $52.34    61.89 – $62.48   22,000   2.6  $62.21    22,000  $62.21   
$61.89 – $62.48   41,153   4.8  $62.34     41,153  $62.34    70.65 – $99.52   68,480   4.4  $86.39    67,817  $86.41   
$75.17 – $99.52   72,000   5.7  $87.35     72,000  $87.35    41.24 – $99.52   115,756   3.3  $73.68 $2,134,000  115,093  $73.62 $2,131,000
$29.60 – $99.52   205,429   4.0  $64.60 $1,891,000  205,429  $64.60 $1,891,000 



The following is a summary of the restricted stock award activity under the director plan described above for the year ended December 31, 2019:


 
Unvested
Restricted
Stock Award
Shares
  
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2018  264  $85.30 
Granted  22,273  $84.81 
Vested  (20,798) $84.91 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2019  1,739  $83.68 


The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted under the director plan for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018, and 2014:2017 were $84.81, $85.70, and $70.65, respectively.

  
Unvested
Restricted
Stock
Award
Shares
  
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2013  384  $75.65 
Granted  8,160  $99.52 
Vested  (8,252) $98.41 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2014  292  $99.52 
Granted  20,350  $78.52 
Vested  (18,851) $79.77 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2015  1,791  $68.73 
Granted  23,074  $64.89 
Vested  (24,518) $65.17 
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2016  347  $64.89 

The total intrinsic value of all stock options exercised under all of the Company’s plans was $266,000, $2,555,000$1,655,000, $6,709,000 and $11,671,000$1,671,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for tax deductions from stock option exercises was $100,000, $948,000$410,000, $2,073,000 and $4,388,000$632,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.



The total intrinsicfair value of all the restricted stock vestings under all of the Company’s plans was $6,928,000, $10,270,000$5,917,000, $12,936,000 and $14,847,000$8,485,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for tax deductions from restricted stock vestings was $2,598,000, $3,810,000$1,464,000, $3,997,000 and $5,583,000$3,208,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.



The total fair value of all the RSU vestings under the Company’s employee plan was $1,727,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019.  The actual tax benefit realized for tax deductions from RSU vestings was $427,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019.  There were 0 RSU vestings for the years ended December 31, 2018 or 2017.



As of December 31, 2016,2019, there was $3,422,000$2,313,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options, and $18,055,000$4,226,000 related to restricted stock.stock and $10,093,000 related to nonvested RSUs. The stock options are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.41.3 years, and restricted stock over approximately 3.11.4 years and RSUs over approximately 3.5 years. The total fair value of stock options vested was $2,495,000, $2,180,000 and $3,759,000 during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The fair value of the restricted stock vested was $6,928,000, $10,270,000 and $14,847,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.




The weighted average per share fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 was $17.30, $25.18$22.77, $23.53 and $36.05,$20.72, respectively. The fair value of the stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 was $3,231,000, $2,893,000$2,666,000, $2,787,000 and $4,226,000,$2,617,000, respectively. The Company currently uses treasury stock shares for restricted stock grants, RSU vestings and stock option exercises. The fair value of each stock option was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The key input variables used in valuing the stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 were as follows:


 2016  2015  2014  2019  2018  2017 
Dividend yield None  None  None  NaN  NaN  NaN 
Average risk-free interest rate  1.5%  1.3%  2.0%  2.5%  2.7%  2.0%
Stock price volatility  30%  33%  33%  28%  27%  27%
Estimated option term Six years  Six years  
Six years
or seven
years
  5.3 years  5.5 years  5.8 years 
(9)
(11) Retirement Plans



The Company sponsors a defined benefit plan for its inland vessel personnel and shore based tankermen. The plan benefits are based on an employee’s years of service and compensation. The plan assets consist primarily of equity and fixed income securities.



On April 12, 2017, the Company amended its pension plan to cease all benefit accruals for periods after May 31, 2017 for certain participants. Participants grandfathered and not impacted were those, as of the close of business on May 31, 2017, who either (a) had completed 15 years of pension service or (b) had attained age 50 and completed 10 years of pension service. Participants non-grandfathered are eligible to receive discretionary 401(k) plan contributions. The Company did not incur any one-time charges related to this amendment but the pension plan’s projected benefit obligation decreased by $33,433,000.


On February 14, 2018, with the acquisition of Higman, the Company assumed Higman’s pension plan for its inland vessel personnel and office staff. On March 27, 2018, the Company amended the Higman pension plan to close it to all new entrants and cease all benefit accruals for periods after May 15, 2018 for all participants. The Company did not incur any one-time charges related to this amendment but the Higman pension plan’s projected benefit obligation decreased by $3,081,000. The Company made contributions to the Higman pension plan of $1,615,000 in 2019 for the 2018 plan year, $1,449,000 in 2019 for the 2019 plan year, $6,717,000 in 2018 for the 2016 and 2017 plan years and $1,385,000 in 2018 for the 2018 year.



The fair value of plan assets of the Company’s pension plans was $257,517,000$358,197,000 and $243,588,000$303,151,000 at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 respectively. As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, these assets were allocated among asset categories as follows:

Asset Category 2016  2015  
Current
Minimum, Target
and Maximum
Allocation Policy
 
U.S. equity securities  51%  50%  30% — 50%— 70%
International equity securities  19%  18%  0% — 20%— 30%
Debt securities  30%  28%  15% — 30%— 55%
Cash and cash equivalents  %  4%  0% — 0%— 5%
   100%  100%    


The
Asset Category 2019  2018  
Current
Minimum, Target
and Maximum
Allocation Policy
 
U.S. equity securities  53%  52%  30% — 50%— 70%
International equity securities  19   17   0% — 20%— 30%
Debt securities  26   28   15% — 30%— 55%
Cash and cash equivalents  2   3   0% — 0%— 5%
   100%  100%    


At December 31, 2019 and 2018, $25,871,000 and $22,497,000 respectively, was held in cash and equity securities classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy and $125,000 and $804,000, respectively, was held in real estate investments classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.  All other plan assets are invested entirely in common collective trusts. These instruments are public investment vehiclestrusts and valued using the net asset value provided by the administrator of the fund. The net asset value is classifiedper share practical expedient and therefore not valued within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy as set forth in the accounting guidance for fair value measurements because the net asset value price is quoted on an inactive private market although the underlying investments are traded on an active market.hierarchy.



The Company’s investment strategy focuses on total return on invested assets (capital appreciation plus dividend and interest income). The primary objective in the investment management of assets is to achieve long-term growth of principal while avoiding excessive risk. Risk is managed through diversification of investments within and among asset classes, as well as by choosing securities that have an established trading and underlying operating history.



The Company makes various assumptions when determining defined benefit plan costs including, but not limited to, the current discount rate and the expected long-term return on plan assets. Discount rates are determined annually and are based on a yield curve that consists of a hypothetical portfolio of high quality corporate bonds with maturities matching the projected benefit cash flows. The Company assumed that plan assets would generate a long-term rate of return of 7.0% in 2019 and 7.5% in 2016 and 2015, respectively.2018. The Company developed its expected long-term rate of return assumption by evaluating input from investment consultants comparing historical returns for various asset classes with its actual and targeted plan investments. The Company believes that its long-term asset allocation, on average, will approximate the targeted allocation.



The Company’s pension plan funding strategy has historically beenis to contribute an amountmake annual contributions in amounts equal to theor greater of the minimum required contribution under ERISA or the amountthan amounts necessary to fully fund the plan on an accumulatedmeet minimum government funding requirements. The plan’s benefit obligation (“ABO”) basis at the end of the fiscal year. The ABO isobligations are based on a variety of demographic and economic assumptions, and the pension plan assets’ returns are subject to various risks, including market and interest rate risk, making an accurate prediction of the pension plan contribution difficult. The Company’s pension plan funding was 94%86% of the pension plan’s ABOplans’ accumulated benefit obligation at December 31, 2016.2019, including the Higman pension plan.



The Company sponsors an unfunded defined benefit health care plan that provides limited postretirement medical benefits to employees who met minimum age and service requirements, and to eligible dependents. The plan limits cost increases in the Company’s contribution to 4% per year. The plan is contributory, with retiree contributions adjusted annually. The plan eliminated coverage for future retirees as of December 31, 2011. The Company also has an unfunded defined benefit supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”) that was assumed in an acquisition in 1999. That plan ceased to accrue additional benefits effective January 1, 2000.



The following table presents the change in benefit obligation and plan assets for the Company’s defined benefit plans and postretirement benefit plan (in thousands):


              
Other Postretirement
Benefits
 
  Pension Benefits  Postretirement 
  Pension Plan  SERP  Welfare Plan 
  2016  2015  2016  2015  2016  2015 
Change in benefit obligation                  
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $297,325  $315,075  $1,526  $1,637  $891  $1,264 
Service cost  13,402   14,683             
Interest cost  14,123   13,302   65   64   29   36 
Actuarial loss (gain)  19,120   (39,474)  12   (30)  (198)  (321)
Gross benefits paid  (6,794)  (6,261)  (146)  (145)  (47)  (88)
Benefit obligation at end of year $337,176  $297,325  $1,457  $1,526  $675  $891 
                         
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year $272,591  $238,775  $1,457  $1,526  $675  $891 
                         
Weighted-average assumption used to determine benefit obligation at end of year                        
Discount rate  4.2%  4.5%  4.2%  4.5%  4.2%  4.5%
Rate of compensation increase 
Service-
based
table
  
Service-
based
table
             
Health care cost trend rate                        
Initial rate              7.0%  6.5%
Ultimate rate              5.0%  5.0%
Years to ultimate              2021   2019 
                         
Effect of one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rate on postretirement obligation                        
Increase $  $  $  $  $74  $107 
Decrease              (64)  (93)
                         
Change in plan assets                        
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $243,588  $242,275  $  $  $  $ 
Actual return on plan assets  20,723   (2,426)            
Employer contribution     10,000   146   145   47   88 
Gross benefits paid  (6,794)  (6,261)  (146)  (145)  (47)  (88)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $257,517  $243,588  $  $  $  $ 
    
Other
Postretirement
Benefits
 
 Pension Benefits  
Postretirement
Welfare Plan
 
 Pension Plan  SERP 
  2019  2018  2019  2018  2019  2018 
Change in benefit obligation                  
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $381,483  $354,994  $1,246  $1,412  $743  $679 
Service cost  7,364   7,622             
Interest cost  16,493   15,499   52   49   31   24 
Actuarial loss (gain)  49,478   (44,935)  72   (70)  (22)  143 
Gross benefits paid  (11,957)  (11,749)  (145)  (145)  (90)  (103)
Curtailments     (3,081)            
Acquisition     63,133             
Benefit obligation at end of year $442,861  $381,483  $1,225  $1,246  $662  $743 
                         
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year $417,981  $356,797  $1,225  $1,246  $662  $743 

Weighted-average assumption used to determine benefit obligation at end of year                  
Discount rate (a)  3.5%  4.4%  3.5%  4.4%  3.5%  4.4%
Rate of compensation increase Service-based table  Service-based table             
Health care cost trend rate                        
Initial rate              6.75%  7.0%
Ultimate rate              5.0%  5.0%
Years to ultimate              2025   2025 

Effect of one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rate on postretirement obligation                  
Increase $  $  $  $  $68  $75 
Decrease              (59)  (65)

Change in plan assets                  
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $303,151  $294,995  $  $  $  $ 
Actual return on plan assets  63,939   (18,214)            
Employer contribution  3,064   8,102   145   145   90   103 
Gross benefits paid  (11,957)  (11,749)  (145)  (145)  (90)  (103)
Acquisition     30,017             
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $358,197  $303,151  $  $  $  $ 


(a)          The discount rate for the Higman pension plan in 2018 was changed from 4.13% as of February 14, 2018 and 4.02% as of March 31, 2018 to 4.40% as of December 31, 2018.



The following table presents the funded status and amounts recognized in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet for the Company’s defined benefit plans and postretirement benefit plan at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands):


              
Other Postretirement
Benefits
 
  Pension Benefits  Postretirement 
  Pension Plan  SERP  Welfare Plan 
  2016  2015  2016  2015  2016  2015 
Funded status at end of year                  
Fair value of plan assets $257,517  $243,588  $  $  $  $ 
Benefit obligations  (337,176)  (297,325)  (1,457)  (1,526)  (675)  (891)
Funded status and amount recognized at end of year $(79,659) $(53,737) $(1,457) $(1,526) $(675) $(891)
                         
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets                        
Noncurrent asset $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Current liability        (150)  (149)  (56)  (68)
Long-term liability  (79,659)  (53,737)  (1,307)  (1,377)  (619)  (823)
                         
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income                        
Net actuarial loss (gain) $87,658  $77,940  $494  $508  $(5,773) $(6,319)
Prior service cost (credit)                  
Accumulated other compensation income $87,658  $77,940  $494  $508  $(5,773) $(6,319)
    
Other Postretirement
Benefits
 
 Pension Benefits  
Postretirement
Welfare Plan
 
 Pension Plan  SERP 
  2019  2018  2019  2018  2019  2018 
Funded status at end of year                  
Fair value of plan assets $358,197  $303,151  $  $  $  $ 
Benefit obligations  (442,861)  (381,483)  (1,225)  (1,246)  (662)  (743)
Funded status and amount recognized at end of year $(84,664) $(78,332) $(1,225) $(1,246) $(662) $(743)


Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets                  
Noncurrent asset $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Current liability        (159)  (158)  (60)  (65)
Long-term liability  (84,664)  (78,332)  (1,066)  (1,087)  (602)  (678)

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income                  
Net actuarial loss (gain) $52,160  $47,101  $460  $415  $(3,795) $(4,313)
Prior service cost (credit)                  
Accumulated other compensation income $52,160  $47,101  $460  $415  $(3,795) $(4,313)


The projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 were as follows (in thousands):

 Pension Benefits  Pension Benefits 
 Pension Plan  SERP  Pension Plan  SERP 
 2016  2015  2016  2015  2019  2018  2019  2018 
Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets                            
Projected benefit obligation at end of year $337,176  $297,325  $1,457  $1,526  $442,861  $381,483  $1,225  $1,246 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year  257,517   243,588         358,197   303,151       



The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 were as follows (in thousands):


 Pension Benefits  Pension Benefits 
 Pension Plan SERP  Pension Plan  SERP 
 2016  2015 2016  2015  2019  2018  2019  2018 
Accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets                            
Projected benefit obligation at end of year $337,176  $ $1,457  $1,526  $442,861  $381,483  $1,225  $1,246 
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year  272,591     1,457   1,526   417,981   356,797   1,225   1,246 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year  257,517           358,197   303,151       



The following tables presentspresent the expected cash flows for the Company’s defined benefit plans and postretirement benefit plan at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands):

      
Other Postretirement
Benefits
 
  Pension Benefits  Postretirement 
  Pension Plan  SERP  Welfare Plan 
   2016  2015  2016  2015  2016  2015 
Expected employer contributions                                   
First year $  $  $153  $152  $50  $70 


               
Other Postretirement
Benefits
 
  Pension Benefits  Postretirement 
  Pension Plan  SERP  Welfare Plan 
  2016  2015  2016  2015  2016  2015 
Expected benefit payments (gross)                  
Year one $8,032  7,678  153  $152  $58  81 
Year two  8,835   8,298   157   157   58   86 
Year three  9,646   9,013   155   154   58   86 
Year four  10,400   9,748   151   152   58   86 
Year five  11,201   10,415   148   149   57   85 
Next five years  70,419   63,860   514   608   199   341 

    
Other Postretirement
Benefits
 
  Pension Benefits  
Postretirement
Welfare Plan
 
  Pension Plan  SERP 
  2019  2018  2019  2018  2019  2018 
Expected employer contributions                  
First year $2,407  $2,395  $  $  $  $ 


           
Other Postretirement
Benefits
     
Other Postretirement
Benefits
 
 Pension Benefits  Postretirement  Pension Benefits  
Postretirement
Welfare Plan
 
 Pension Plan SERP  Welfare Plan  Pension Plan  SERP 
 2016 2015 2016 2015  2016 2015  2019  2018  2019  2018  2019  2018 
Expected federal subsidy                   
Expected benefit payments (gross)                  
Year one   $   (7) $(11) $12,063  $12,209  $162  $162  $61  $66 
Year two            (7)  (11)  13,123   13,108   158   159   62   68 
Year three           (7)  (11)  14,300   13,959   133   155   51   69 
Year four           (7)  (12)  15,572   14,959   107   130   51   57 
Year five           (7)  (12)  16,857   16,052   103   104   49   56 
Next five years           (33)  (55)  100,587   96,547   426   447   220   261 




The components of net periodic benefit cost and other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income for the Company’s defined benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 were as follows (in thousands):

   
 Pension Benefits 
  Pension Plan  SERP 
  2019  2018  2017  2019  2018  2017 
Components of net periodic benefit cost                  
Service cost $7,364  $7,622  $10,677  $  $  $ 
Interest cost  16,493   15,499   13,729   52   49   58 
Expected return on plan assets  (20,956)  (22,406)  (18,195)         
Amortization:                        
Actuarial loss  1,438   2,890   4,400   28   23   28 
Prior service credit                  
Net periodic benefit cost  4,339   3,605   10,611   80   72   86 
                         
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income                        
Current year actuarial loss (gain)  6,497   (7,396)  7,562   73   (70)  42 
Recognition of actuarial loss  (1,438)  (2,890)  (37,833)  (28)  (23)  (28)
Recognition of prior service credit                  
Total recognized in other comprehensive income  5,059   (10,286)  (30,271)  45   (93)  14 
                         
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income $9,398  $(6,681) $(19,660) $125  $(21) $100 
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost                        
Discount rate (a)  4.4%  3.7%  4.2/4.0%  4.4%  3.7%  4.2%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets  7.0%  7.0%  7.0%         
Rate of compensation increase Service- based table  Service- based table  Service- based table          


  Pension Benefits 
  Pension Plan  SERP 
  2016  2015  2014  2016  2015  2014 
Components of net periodic benefit cost                  
Service cost $13,402  $14,683  $10,645  $  $  $ 
Interest cost  14,123   13,302   12,839   65   64   73 
Expected return on plan assets  (16,805)  (17,921)  (18,858)         
Amortization:                        
Actuarial loss  5,484   7,728   701   26   28   16 
Prior service credit                  
Net periodic benefit cost  16,204   17,792   5,327   91   92   89 
                         
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income                        
Current year actuarial loss (gain)  15,203   (19,127)  72,737   12   (30)  180 
Recognition of actuarial loss  (5,484)  (7,728)  (701)  (26)  (28)  (16)
Recognition of prior service credit                  
Total recognized in other comprehensive income  9,719   (26,855)  72,036   (14)  (58)  164 
                         
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income $25,923  $(9,063) $77,363  $77  $34  $253 
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost                        
Discount rate  4.5%  4.1%  5.0%  4.5%  4.1%  5.0%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets  7.0%  7.5%  7.5%         
Rate of compensation increase 
Service-
based
table
   4.25%  4.25%         

(a)The 2018 discount rate for benefit cost for the Higman pension plan was changed from 4.13% as of February 14, 2018 and 4.02% as of March 31, 2018 to 4.40% as of December 31, 2018.  In 2017, benefit cost for the pension plan was determined using a discount rate of 4.2% for the period beginning January 1, 2017 and ending April 11, 2017 and 4.0% for the period beginning April 12, 2017 and ending December 31, 2017.


The estimated amounts that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost in 20172020 are as follows (in thousands):


 Pension Benefits  Pension Benefits 
 
Pension
Plan
 SERP  
Pension
Plan
  SERP 
Actuarial loss $5,477 $28  $929  $35 
Prior service credit           
 $5,477 $28  $929  $35 





The components of net periodic benefit cost and other changes in benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income for the Company’s postretirement benefit plan for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 were as follows (in thousands):


 Other Postretirement Benefits  Other Postretirement Benefits 
 Postretirement Welfare Plan  Postretirement Welfare Plan 
 2016  2015  2014  2019  2018  2017 
Components of net periodic benefit cost                  
Service cost $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Interest cost  29   36   110   31   24   27 
Amortization:                        
Actuarial gain  (747)  (793)  (649)  (540)  (596)  (668)
Prior service cost                  
Net periodic benefit cost  (718)  (757)  (539)  (509)  (572)  (641)
                        
Other changes in benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income                        
Current year actuarial gain  (198)  (322)  (1,065)
Current year actuarial loss (gain)  (22)  144   52 
Recognition of actuarial gain  747   793   649   540   596   668 
Recognition of prior service cost                  
Adjustment for actual Medicare Part D reimbursement  (3)  (3)  (8)
Total recognized in other comprehensive income  546   468   (424)  518   740   720 
                        
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income $(172) $(289) $(963) $9  $168  $79 
                        
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost                        
Discount rate  4.5%  4.1%  5.0%  4.4%  3.7%  4.2%
Health care cost trend rate:                        
Initial rate  6.5%  7.0%  7.0%  7.0%  7.0%  7.0%
Ultimate rate  5.0%  5.0%  5.0%  5.0%  5.0%  5.0%
Years to ultimate  2019   2019   2018   2025   2022   2021 
                        
Effect of one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rate on aggregate service and interest cost                        
Increase $4  $5  $7  $3  $3  $3 
Decrease  (3)  (4)  (6)  (3)  (2)  (3)



The estimated amounts that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost in 20172020 are as follows (in thousands):


 
Other
Postretirement
Benefits
  
Other
Postretirement
Benefits
 
 
Postretirement
Welfare Plan
  
Postretirement
Welfare Plan
 
Actuarial gain $(668) $(522)
Prior service cost      
 $(668) $(522)



The Company also contributes to a multiemployer pension plan pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement which covers certain vessel crew members of its coastal operations and expires on April 30, 2018.2022. The Company began participation in the Seafarers Pension Trust (“SPT”) with the Penn Maritime, Inc. acquisition on December 14, 2012.

Contributions to the SPT are made currently based on a per day worked basis and charged to expense as incurred and included in costs of sales and operating expenses in the consolidated statement of earnings. During 20162019 and 2015,2018, the Company made contributions of $877,000$665,000 and $1,202,000,$671,000, respectively, to the SPT. The Company’s contributions to the SPT exceeded 5% of total contributions to the SPT in 2015.2018. Total contributions for 20162019 are not yet available. The Company did not pay any material surcharges in 20152019 or 2016.2018.



The federal identification number of the SPT is 13-6100329 and the Certified Zone Status is Green at December 31, 2015.2018. The Company’s future minimum contribution requirements under the SPT are unavailable because actuarial reports for the 20162019 plan year are not yet complete and such contributions are subject to negotiations between the employers and the unions. The SPT was neithernot in endangered or critical status for the 20152018 plan year, the latest period for which a report is available, as the funded status was in excess of 100%. Based on an actuarial valuation performed as of December 31, 2015,2018, there would be no withdrawal liability if the Company chose to withdraw from the SPT although the Company currently has no intention of terminating its participation in the SPT.



The Company also contributes to a multiemployer pension plan pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement which covers certain employees of its distribution and services segment in New Jersey and expires on October 8, 2023. The Company began participation in the Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers (“CPF”) with the S&S acquisition on September 13, 2017.


Contributions to the CPF are made currently based on a fixed hourly rate for each hour worked or paid basis (in some cases contributions are made as a percentage of gross pay) and charged to expense as incurred and included in costs of sales and operating expenses in the consolidated statement of earnings. During 2019 and 2018, the Company made contributions of $693,000 and $736,000, respectively, to the CPF. Total contributions for the 2019 plan year are not yet available. The Company did not pay any material surcharges in 2019 or 2018.


The federal identification number of the CPF is 36-6052390 and the Certified Zone Status is Green at January 31, 2019. The Company’s future minimum contribution requirements under the CPF are unavailable because actuarial reports for the 2019 plan year, which ended January 31, 2020, are not yet complete and such contributions are subject to negotiations between the employers and the unions. The CPF was not in endangered or critical status for the 2018 plan year, the latest period for which a report is available, as the funded status was 95%. Based on an actuarial valuation performed as of January 31, 2019, there would be no withdrawal liability if the Company chose to withdraw from the CPF although the Company currently has no intention of terminating its participation in the CPF.


In addition to the defined benefit plans, the Company sponsors various defined contribution plans for substantially all employees. The aggregate contributions to the plans were $18,213,000, $24,077,000$25,409,000, $22,392,000 and $23,356,000$17,247,000 in 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.

(10)

(12) Other Comprehensive Income



The Company’s changes in other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 were as follows (in thousands):


 2016  2015  2014  2019  2018  2017 
 
Gross
Amount
  
Income
Tax
(Provision)
Benefit
  
Net
Amount
  
Gross
Amount
  
Income
Tax
(Provision)
Benefit
  
Net
Amount
  
Gross
Amount
  
Income
Tax
(Provision)
Benefit
  
Net
Amount
  
Gross
Amount
  
Income
Tax
(Provision)
Benefit
  
Net
Amount
  
Gross
Amount
  
Income
Tax
(Provision)
Benefit
  
Net
Amount
  
Gross
Amount
  
Income
Tax
(Provision)
Benefit
  
Net
Amount
 
Pension and postretirement benefits (a):                                                      
Amortization of net actuarial loss $4,763  $(1,825) $2,938  $6,963  $(2,667) $4,296  $68  $(26) $42  $926  $(236) $690  $2,317  $(585) $1,732  $3,760  $(1,417) $2,343 
Actuarial gains (losses)  (15,013)  5,754   (9,259)  19,482   (7,456)  12,026   (71,843)  27,507   (44,336)  (6,548)  1,655   (4,893)  7,322   (1,416)  5,906   25,776   (9,371)  16,405 
                                    
Adoption of ASU 2018-02 – reclassification to retained earnings              (7,925)  (7,925)         
Foreign currency translation adjustments           29      29   (35)     (35)  (85)     (85)  (819)     (819)  (146)     (146)
                                    
Change in fair value of derivative instruments (b):                                    
Unrealized gains (losses)                    24   (9)  15 
Reclassified to net earnings                    121   (51)  70 
Total $(10,250) $3,929  $(6,321) $26,474  $(10,123) $16,351  $(71,665) $27,421  $(44,244) $(5,707) $1,419  $(4,288) $8,820  $(9,926) $(1,106) $29,390  $(10,788) $18,602 


(a)Actuarial gains (losses) are amortized into costs of sales and operating expenses or selling, general and administrative expenses as appropriate. (See Note 9 – Retirement Plans)


(a)          Actuarial gains (losses) are amortized into other income (expense). (See Note 11 – Retirement Plans)
(b)Reclassifications to net earnings of derivatives qualifying as effective hedges are recognized in costs of sales and operating expenses.

(11)(13) Earnings Per Share



The following table presents the components of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 (in thousands, except per share amounts):


 2016  2015  2014  2019  2018  2017 
Net earnings attributable to Kirby $141,406  $226,684  $282,006  $142,347  $78,452  $313,187 
Undistributed earnings allocated to restricted shares  (999)  (1,345)  (1,643)  (369)  (324)  (2,213)
Income available to Kirby common stockholders — basic  140,407   225,339   280,363   141,978   78,128   310,974 
Undistributed earnings allocated to restricted shares  999   1,345   1,643   369   324   2,213 
Undistributed earnings reallocated to restricted shares  (997)  (1,343)  (1,637)  (369)  (323)  (2,211)
Income available to Kirby common stockholders — diluted $140,409  $225,341  $280,369  $141,978  $78,129  $310,976 
                        
Shares outstanding:                        
Weighted average common stock issued and outstanding  53,834   55,056   57,006   59,905   59,804   55,702 
Weighted average unvested restricted stock  (380)  (327)  (332)  (155)  (247)  (394)
Weighted average common stock outstanding — basic  53,454   54,729   56,674   59,750   59,557   55,308 
Dilutive effect of stock options  58   97   193 
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock units  159   132   53 
Weighted average common stock outstanding — diluted  53,512   54,826   56,867   59,909   59,689   55,361 
Net earnings per share attributable to Kirby common stockholders:                        
Basic $2.63  $4.12  $4.95  $2.38  $1.31  $5.62 
                        
Diluted $2.62  $4.11  $4.93  $2.37  $1.31  $5.62 



Certain outstanding options to purchase approximately 240,000, 227,000187,000, 384,000 and 75,000472,000 shares of common stock were excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per share as of December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively, as such stock options would have been antidilutive.  NaN RSUs were antidilutive at December 31, 2019.

(14) Quarterly Results (Unaudited)



The unaudited quarterly results for the year ended December 31, 20162019 were as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):


 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
 
March 31,
2016
  
June 30,
2016
  
September 30,
2016
  
December 31,
2016
  
March 31,
2019
  
June 30,
2019
  
September 30,
2019
  
December 31,
2019
 
Revenues $458,733  $441,582  $434,708  $435,650  $744,621  $771,042  $666,809  $655,927 
Costs and expenses  393,399   374,868   378,400   378,684   674,672   698,317   588,534   643,001 
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets  67   94   (122)  (166)  2,157   3,118   (374)  3,251 
Operating income  65,401   66,808   56,186   56,800   72,106   75,843   77,901   16,177 
Other income (expense)  135   179   (120)  47   (568)  2,381   864   1,110 
Interest expense  (4,193)  (4,513)  (4,507)  (4,477)  (13,201)  (15,515)  (14,310)  (12,968)
Earnings before taxes on income  61,343   62,474   51,559   52,370   58,337   62,709   64,455   4,319 
Provision for taxes on income  (22,859)  (23,365)  (19,206)  (19,512)  (13,880)  (15,269)  (16,305)  (1,347)
Net earnings  38,484   39,109   32,353   32,858   44,457   47,440   48,150   2,972 
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests  (385)  (167)  (343)  (503)  (161)  (153)  (163)  (195)
Net earnings attributable to Kirby $38,099  $38,942  $32,010  $32,355  $44,296  $47,287  $47,987  $2,777 
                                
Net earnings per share attributable to Kirby common stockholders:                                
Basic $0.71  $0.72  $0.59  $0.60  $0.74  $0.79  $0.80  $0.05 
Diluted $0.71  $0.72  $0.59  $0.60  $0.74  $0.79  $0.80  $0.05 

The unaudited quarterly results for the year ended December 31, 20152018 were as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):


 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
 
March 31,
2015
  
June 30,
2015
  
September 30,
2015
  
December 31,
2015
  
March 31,
2018
  
June 30,
2018
  
September 30,
2018
  
December 31,
2018
 
Revenues $587,673  $543,156  $532,565  $484,138  $741,688  $802,671  $704,845  $721,493 
Costs and expenses  486,136   445,113   437,115   400,178   692,866   747,260   636,906   740,344 
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets  1,555   91   (400)  426   1,898   442   18   (390)
Operating income  103,092   98,134   95,050   84,386 
Other income (expense)  60   (303)  22   9 
Operating income (loss)  50,720   55,853   67,957   (19,241)
Other income  1,591   1,541   1,454   1,140 
Interest expense  (5,250)  (4,759)  (4,449)  (4,280)  (9,780)  (12,540)  (12,345)  (12,191)
Earnings before taxes on income  97,902   93,072   90,623   80,115 
Provision for taxes on income  (36,491)  (34,696)  (33,512)  (29,043)
Net earnings  61,411   58,376   57,111   51,072 
Earnings (loss) before taxes on income  42,531   44,854   57,066   (30,292)
Benefit (provision) for taxes on income  (9,865)  (16,061)  (15,116)  5,961 
Net earnings (loss)  32,666   28,793   41,950   (24,331)
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests  (333)  (301)  (268)  (384)  (195)  (191)  (134)  (106)
Net earnings attributable to Kirby $61,078  $58,075  $56,843  $50,688 
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Kirby $32,471  $28,602  $41,816  $(24,437)
                                
Net earnings per share attributable to Kirby common stockholders:                
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to Kirby common stockholders:                
Basic $1.09  $1.04  $1.04  $0.94  $0.54  $0.48  $0.70  $(0.41)
Diluted $1.09  $1.04  $1.04  $0.94  $0.54  $0.48  $0.70  $(0.41)



Quarterly basic and diluted earnings per share may not total to the full year per share amounts, as the weighted average number of shares outstanding for each quarter fluctuates as a result of the assumed exercise of stock options.

(13)

(15) Contingencies and Commitments



In 2009, the Company was named by the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) as a Potentially Responsible Party (“PRP”) in addition to a group of approximately 250 named PRPs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1981 (“CERCLA”) with respect to a Superfund site, the Portland Harbor Superfund site (“Portland Harbor”) in Portland, Oregon. The site was declared a Superfund site in December 2000 as a result of historical heavily industrialized use due to manufacturing, shipbuilding, petroleum storage and distribution, metals salvaging, and electrical power generation activities which led to contamination of Portland Harbor, an urban and industrial reach of the lower Willamette River located immediately downstream of downtown Portland. The Company’s involvement arises from four4 spills at the site after it was declared a Superfund site, as a result of predecessor entities’ actions in the area. To date, there is no information suggesting the extent of the costs or damages to be claimed from the 250 notified PRPs. Based on the nature of the involvement at the Portland Harbor site, the Company believes its potential contribution is de minimis; however, to date neither the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)EPA nor the named PRPs have performed an allocation of potential liability in connection with the site nor have they provided costs and expenses in connection with the site.


In January
On February 20, 2015, the Company was namedserved as a defendant in a Complaint originally filed on August 14, 2014, in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Texas - Houston Division, USOR Site PRP Group vs. A&M Contractors, USES, Inc. et al. This is a civil action pursuant to the provisions of CERCLA and the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act for recovery of past and future response costs incurred and to be incurred by the USOR Site PRP Group for response activities at the U.S. Oil Recovery Superfund Site. The property was a former sewage treatment plant owned by defendant City of Pasadena, Texas from approximately 1945 until it was acquired by U.S. Oil Recovery in January 2009. Throughout its operating life, the U.S. Oil Recovery facility portion of the USOR Site received and performed wastewater pretreatment of municipal and Industrial Class I and Class II wastewater, characteristically hazardous waste, used oil and oily sludges, and municipal solid waste. Associated operations were conducted at the MCC Recycling facility portion of the USOR Site after it was acquired by U.S. Oil Recovery from the City of Pasadena in January 2009. Initially,The EPA and the plaintiff stayed prosecutionPRP Group entered into an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order for Remedial Investigation Study (“Study”) in May 2015. The Study has not been completed by EPA to date. The Company joined as a member of the case pending responses to initial settlement demands. In January 2016, the Company filed responsive pleadings in this matter. Based on the nature of the involvementPRP Group companies at the USOR Site, the Company believes its potential contribution is de minimis; however, to date neither the EPA nor the named PRPs have performed an allocation of potential liability in connection with the site nor have they provided costs and expenses in connection with the site.pro-rata allocated share.

On October 13, 2016, the Company, as a successor to Hollywood Marine, Inc. (“Hollywood Marine”), was issued a General Notice under CERCLA by the EPA in which it was named as a PRP for liabilities associated with the SBA Shipyard Site located near Jennings, Louisiana (“Site”(the “Site”). The Site was added to the EPA’s National Priorities List of sites under CERCLA in September 2016. SBA used the facility for construction, repair, retrofitting, sandblasting, and cleaning and painting of barges beginning in 1965. ThreeNaN barge slips and a dry dock are located off the Mermentau River. The slips were used to dock barges during cleaning or repair. In 2001, a group of PRPs that had been former customers of the SBA Shipyard facility formed an organization called the SSIC Remediation, LLC (hereinafter, “the PRP Group Companies”) to address removal actions at the Site. In 2002, EPA approved an Interim Measures/Removal Action of Hazardous/Principal Threat Wastes at SBA Shipyards, Inc. (pursuant to RCRA Section 3008(h)) that was proposed by SBA Shipyard and the PRP Group Companies. Interim removal activities were conducted from March 2001 through January 2005 under an EPA 2002 Order and Agreement. In September 2012, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality requested EPA address the SBA Shipyard siteSite under CERCLA authority. The Company, is investigating its activitiesas a successor to Hollywood Marine, joined the PRP Group Companies. The PRP Group Companies have submitted a draft Study work plan to EPA for their review and comment. Higman was named as a PRP in connection with its activities at the Site. Higman is not a participant in the PRP Group Companies.



With respect to the above sites, the Company has recorded reserves, if applicable, for its estimated potential liability for its portion of the EPA’s past costs claim based on information developed to date including various factors such as the Company’s liability in proportion to other responsible partiesPRPs and the extent to which such costs are recoverable from third parties.




On May 10, 2019, two tank barges and a towboat, the M/V Voyager, owned and operated by Kirby Inland Marine, LP, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, were struck by the LPG tanker, the Genesis River, in the Houston Ship Channel. The bow of the Genesis River penetrated the Kirby 30015T and capsized the MMI 3014. The collision penetrated the hull of the Kirby 30015T causing its cargo, reformate, to be discharged into the water. The USCG and the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB”) designated the owner and pilot of the Genesis River as well as the subsidiary of the Company as parties of interest in their investigation into the cause of the incident. On June 19, 2019, the Company filed a limitation action in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Texas - Galveston Division seeking limitation of liability and asserting the Genesis River and her owner/manager are at fault for damages including removal costs and claims under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and maritime law. Multiple claimants have filed claims in the limitation seeking damages under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990.The Company has various insurance policies covering liabilities including pollution, marine and general liability and believes that it has satisfactory insurance coverage for the potential liabilities arising from the incident. The Company believes it has accrued adequate reserves for the incident and does not expect the incident to have a material adverse effect on its business or financial condition.



On October 13, 2016, the tug Nathan E. Stewart and barge DBL 55, an articulated tank bargeATB owned and tugboat unit,operated by Kirby Offshore Marine, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, ran aground at the entrance to Seaforth Channel on Atholone Island, British Columbia. The grounding resulted in a breach of a portion of the Nathan E. Stewart’s fuel tanks causing a discharge of diesel fuel into the water. The USCG and the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB”)NTSB designated the Company as a party of interest in their investigation as to the cause of the incident. The Canadian authorities including Transport Canada and the Canadian Transportation Safety Board are also investigatinginvestigated the cause of the incident. TheOn October 10, 2018, the Heiltsuk First Nation filed a civil action in the British Columbia Supreme Court against a subsidiary of the Company, is subject to claims from third parties as well as the provincialmaster and federalpilot of the tug, the vessels and the Canadian government seeking unquantified damages as a result of the incident. On May 1, 2019, the Company filed a limitation action in the Federal Court of Canada seeking limitation of liability relating to the incident as provided under admiralty law. The Heiltsuk First Nation’s civil claim has been consolidated into the Federal Court limitation action as of July 26, 2019 and it is expected that the Federal Court of Canada will decide all claims against the Company. The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure in the civil proceeding. On July 16, 2019, the Company and the Canadian government settled the charges against the subsidiary of the Company. The subsidiary of the Company agreed to pay the Canadian government a fine of approximately $2,900,000 Canadian dollars ($2,200,000 U.S. dollars) for violations of the Canadian Fisheries Act, the Migratory Birds Convention Act, the Pilotage Act and the Shipping Act of 2001. The Company has various insurance policies covering liabilities including pollution, property, marine and general liability and believes that it has satisfactory insurance coverage for the cost of cleanup and salvage operations as well as other potential liabilities arising from the incident. The Company believes it has accrued adequate reserves for the incident and does not expect the incident to have a material adverse effect on its business or financial condition.




On March 22, 2014, two2 tank barges and a towboat, (thethe M/V Miss Susan),Susan, owned by Kirby Inland Marine, LP, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, were involved in a collision with the M/S Summer Wind on the Houston Ship Channel near Texas City, Texas. The lead tank barge was damaged in the collision resulting in a discharge of intermediate fuel oil from one1 of its cargo tanks.  The USCG and the NTSB namedWhile all legal action to date involving the Company andhas been resolved, the Captain of the M/V Miss Susan, as well as the owner and the pilot of the M/S Summer Wind, as parties of interest in their investigation as to the cause of the incident. Sea Galaxy Ltd is the owner of the M/S Summer Wind. The Company is participating in the natural resource damage assessment and restoration process with federal and state government natural resource trustees.

The Company and the owner of the M/S Summer Wind filed actions in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas seeking exoneration from or limitation of liability relating to the foregoing incident as provided for in the federal rules of procedure for maritime claims. The two actions were consolidated for procedural purposes since they both arise out of the same occurrence. Multiple parties filed claims in limitation seeking various damages under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”), including claims for business interruption, loss of profit and loss of use of natural resources (OPA claimants). On November 2, 2016, the Company, the M/S Summer Wind and its owners and the OPA claimants entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which the parties have resolved their respective claims against one another. The dismissal of the OPA claims was entered by the Court on November 14, 2016.
The Company has also been named as a defendant in a civil action by two crewmembers of the M/V Miss Susan, alleging damages under the general maritime law and the Jones Act. The Company is defending the civil action in the proceeding in Galveston Civil District Court. The Company is processing claims that have not been filed in the limitation matter that are properly presented, documented and recoverable under OPA.

On September 13, 2016, the Company entered into a Consent Decree with the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to settle civil penalty provisions under Section 311(b) of the Clean Water Act involving the discharge of intermediate fuel oil as a result of the collision between the tank barge and the M/S Summer Wind. Under the Consent Decree, the Company agreed to pay a civil penalty of $4,900,000 and undertake certain actions relating to navigation procedures. On September 27, 2016, the DOJ filed the proposed Consent Decree with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas along with an Original Complaint setting out the allegations that the Company is civilly liable for violation of Section 311(b) of the Clean Water Act. The Consent Decree was approved by the federal court on November 14, 2016.

The Company believes it has adequate insurance coverage for pollution, marine and other potential liabilities arising from the incident. The Company believes it has accrued adequate reserves for the incident and does not expect the incident to have a material adverse effect on its business or financial condition.



In addition, the Company is involved in various legal and other proceedings which are incidental to the conduct of its business, none of which in the opinion of management will have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Management believes that it has recorded adequate reserves and believes that it has adequate insurance coverage or has meritorious defenses for these other claims and contingencies.



Certain Significant Risks and Uncertainties. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. However, in the opinion of management, the amounts would be immaterial.



The customer base of the marine transportation segment includes major industrial petrochemical and chemical manufacturers, refining companies and agricultural chemical manufacturers operating in the United States. During the first nine months of 2016,2019, approximately 80%65% of marine transportation’s inland revenues were from movements of such products under term contracts, and during the 2016 fourth quarter, approximately 75% of inland marine transportation revenues were under term contracts, typically ranging from one year to fivethree years, some with renewal options. During 2016,2019, approximately 80% of the marine transportation’s coastal revenues were under term contracts. While the manufacturing and refining companies have generally been customers of the Company for numerous years (some as long as 40 years) and management anticipates a continuing relationship, there is no assurance that any individual contract will be renewed. NoNaN single customer of the marine transportation segment accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s revenues in 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014.2017.


Major customers of the diesel enginedistribution and services segment include inland and offshore barge operators, oilfield service companies, oil and gas operators and producers, inland and offshore barge operators, offshore fishing companies, marine and on-highway transportation companies, construction companies, the United States government, and power generation, nuclear and industrial companies.



The segment operates as an authorized distributor in 17 eastern states, nine western states and the Caribbean, and as non-exclusive authorized service centers for EMD throughout the restresults of the United Statesdistribution and services segment are largely tied to the industries it serves and, therefore, can be influenced by the cycles of such industries. NaN single customer of the distribution and services segment accounted for marine10% or more of the Company’s revenues in 2019, 2018 and power generation applications. The diesel engine services segment’s relationship with EMD has been maintained for 51 years. The segment also operates factory-authorized full service marine dealerships for Cummins, Detroit Diesel and John Deere high-speed diesel engines and Twin Disc marine gears in the Gulf Coast region, as well as an authorized marine dealer for Caterpillar in Alabama, Kentucky, Louisiana and New Jersey.2017.

United Holdings LLC (“United”)  has maintained continuous exclusive distribution rights for MTU and Allison Transmission products since 1946. United is one of MTU’s top five5 distributors of MTU off-highway engines in North America with exclusive distribution rights in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi. In addition, as a distributor of Allison transmissionTransmission products, United has distribution rights in Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana. Finally, United is also the distributor for parts service and warranty on Daimler Truck North America (“DTNA”) engines and related equipment in Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana.


The results
S&S is also one of MTU’s top 5 distributors for off-highway engines with exclusive distribution rights in multiple states. S&S also has authorized exclusive distribution rights for Allison Transmission, Detroit Diesel, Deutz, DTNA, EMD, Rolls Royce Power and Volvo Penta diesel engines in multiple key growth states, primarily through the Central, South and Eastern parts of the United States and strategically located near major oil and gas fields, marine waterways and on-highway transportation routes. In addition, S&S has long-term relationships with numerous smaller suppliers including Donaldson, Freightliner, Generac and John Deere.


Kirby Engine Systems LLC, through Marine Systems, Inc. and Engine Systems, Inc. (“Engine Systems”), operates as an authorized EMD distributor throughout the United States. Engine Systems is also the authorized EMD distributor for nuclear power applications worldwide. The relationship with EMD has been maintained for over 50 years. The segment also operates factory-authorized full service marine distributorship/dealerships for Cummins, Detroit Diesel and John Deere high-speed diesel engines and Falk, Lufkin and Twin Disc marine gears, as well as an authorized marine dealer for Caterpillar diesel engine services segment are largely tied to the industries it serves and, therefore, can be influenced by the cycles of such industries. No single customer of the diesel engine services segment accounted for 10% of the Company’s revenues in 2016, 2015 and 2014.multiple states.



Weather can be a major factor in the day-to-day operations of the marine transportation segment. Adverse weather conditions, such as high or low water, tropical storms, hurricanes, tsunamis, fog and ice, can impair the operating efficiencies of the marine fleet. Shipments of products can be delayed or postponed by weather conditions, which are totally beyond the control of the Company. Adverse water conditions are also factors which impair the efficiency of the fleet and can result in delays, diversions and limitations on night passages, and dictate horsepower requirements and size of tows. Additionally, much of the inland waterway system is controlled by a series of locks and dams designed to provide flood control, maintain pool levels of water in certain areas of the country and facilitate navigation on the inland river system. Maintenance and operation of the navigable inland waterway infrastructure is a government function handled by the Army Corps of Engineers with costs shared by industry. Significant changes in governmental policies or appropriations with respect to maintenance and operation of the infrastructure could adversely affect the Company.



The Company’s marine transportation segment is subject to regulation by the USCG, federal laws, state laws and certain international conventions, as well as numerous environmental regulations. The Company believes that additional safety, environmental and occupational health regulations may be imposed on the marine industry. There can be no assurance that any such new regulations or requirements, or any discharge of pollutants by the Company, will not have an adverse effect on the Company.



The Company’s marine transportation segment competes principally in markets subject to the Jones Act, a federal cabotage law that restricts domestic marine transportation in the United States to vessels built and registered in the United States, and manned, owned and ownedoperated by United States citizens. The Jones Act cabotage provisions occasionally come under attack by interests seeking to facilitate foreign flag competition in trades reserved for domestic companies and vessels under the Jones Act. The Company believes that continued efforts will be made to modify or eliminate the cabotage provisions of the Jones Act. If such efforts are successful, certain elements could have an adverse effect on the Company. However, the Company believes that it is unlikely that the current cabotage provisions of the Jones Act would be eliminated or significantly modified in a way that has a material adverse impact on the Company in the foreseeable future.



The Company has issued guaranties or obtained standby letters of credit and performance bonds supporting performance by the Company and its subsidiaries of contractual or contingent legal obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries incurred in the ordinary course of business. The aggregate notional value of these instruments is $13,983,000$22,804,000 at December 31, 2016,2019, including $3,799,000$11,240,000 in letters of credit and $10,184,000$11,564,000 in performance bonds. All of these instruments have an expiration date within threetwo years. The Company does not believe demand for payment under these instruments is likely and expects no material cash outlays to occur in connection with these instruments.

(14)
(16) Segment Data



The Company’s operations are aggregated into two2 reportable business segments as follows:



Marine TransportationProvidesProvide marine transportation principally by United States flag vessels of liquid cargoes throughout the United States inland waterway system, along all three United States coasts, in Alaska and Hawaii and, to a lesser extent, in United States coastal transportation of dry-bulk cargoes. The principal products transported include petrochemicals, black oil, refined petroleum products and agricultural chemicals.

Diesel EngineDistribution and Services — Provides after-market services and parts for medium-speed and high-speed diesel engines, transmissions, reduction gears and ancillary products forrelated equipment used in oilfield service, marine, and power generation, applications, distributeson-highway, and services high-speed diesel engines, transmissionsother industrial applications. The Company also rents equipment including generators, industrial compressors, railcar movers, and pumps,high capacity lift trucks for use in a variety of industrial markets, and manufactures and remanufactures oilfield service equipment, including pressure pumping units, for the land-based oilfield service and oil and gas operator and producer markets.customers.



The Company’s two2 reportable business segments are managed separately based on fundamental differences in their operations. The Company’s accounting policies for the business segments are the same as those described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on the contributions to operating income of the respective segments, and before income taxes, interest, gains or losses on disposition of assets, other nonoperating income, noncontrolling interests, accounting changes, and nonrecurring items. Intersegment revenues, based on market-based pricing, of the diesel enginedistribution and services segment from the marine transportation segment of $24,672,000, $26,203,000$27,441,000, $29,363,000 and $25,769,000$20,717,000 in 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively, as well as the related intersegment profit of $2,467,000, $2,620,000$2,744,000, $2,936,000 and $2,577,000$2,072,000 in 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively, have been eliminated from the tables below.



The following table sets forth by reportable segment the revenues, profit or loss, total assets, depreciation and amortization, and capital expenditures attributable to the principal activities of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 (in thousands):


 2016  2015  2014  2019  2018  2017 
Revenues:                  
Marine transportation $1,471,893  $1,663,090  $1,770,684  $1,587,082  $1,483,143  $1,324,106 
Diesel engine services  298,780   484,442   795,634 
Distribution and services  1,251,317   1,487,554   890,312 
 $1,770,673  $2,147,532  $2,566,318  $2,838,399  $2,970,697  $2,214,418 
Segment profit (loss):                        
Marine transportation $257,102  $374,842  $429,864  $215,842  $147,416  $135,547 
Diesel engine services  3,186   18,921   60,063 
Distribution and services  67,201   129,305   86,479 
Other  (32,542)  (32,051)  (35,537)  (93,223)  (162,562)  (149,012)
 $227,746  $361,712  $454,390  $189,820  $114,159  $73,014 
Total assets:                        
Marine transportation $3,622,348  $3,451,553  $3,317,696  $4,536,368  $4,145,294  $3,485,099 
Diesel engine services  628,290   637,549   736,129 
Distribution and services  1,422,394   1,653,636   1,567,085 
Other  52,861   63,179   83,789   120,335   72,664   75,243 
 $4,303,499  $4,152,281  $4,137,614  $6,079,097  $5,871,594  $5,127,427 
Depreciation and amortization:                        
Marine transportation $184,291  $175,798  $154,019  $179,742  $182,307  $178,898 
Diesel engine services  12,833   12,498   11,463 
Distribution and services  35,998   39,349   20,387 
Other  3,793   3,944   3,830   3,892   3,316   3,596 
 $200,917  $192,240  $169,312  $219,632  $224,972  $202,881 
Capital expenditures:                        
Marine transportation $217,423  $311,862  $340,315  $217,364  $284,953  $165,421 
Diesel engine services  5,915   28,907   7,486 
Distribution and services  18,284   10,742   5,086 
Other  7,728   4,706   7,343   12,516   6,166   6,715 
 $231,066  $345,475  $355,144  $248,164  $301,861  $177,222 

The following table presents the details of “Other” segment profit (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 (in thousands):


 2016  2015  2014  2019  2018  2017 
General corporate expenses $(14,966) $(14,773) $(14,896) $(13,643) $(35,590) $(18,202)
Interest expense  (17,690)  (18,738)  (21,461)  (55,994)  (46,856)  (21,472)
Inventory write-down  (35,525)      
Impairment of long-lived assets     (82,705)  (105,712)
Impairment of goodwill     (2,702)   
Lease cancellation costs     (2,403)   
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets  (127)  1,672   781   8,152   1,968   (4,487)
Other income (expense)  241   (212)  39   3,787   5,726   861 
 $(32,542) $(32,051) $(35,537) $(93,223) $(162,562) $(149,012)



The following table presents the details of “Other” total assets as of December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 (in thousands):


 2016  2015  2014  2019  2018  2017 
General corporate assets $50,239  $61,089  $81,250  $118,310  $70,169  $73,353 
Investment in affiliates  2,622   2,090   2,539   2,025   2,495   1,890 
 $52,861  $63,179  $83,789  $120,335  $72,664  $75,243 
(15)

(17) Related Party Transactions


Richard J. Alario, a current director of the Company, was Chief Executive Officer of Key Energy Services, Inc. (“Key Energy”) until his retirement on March 1, 2016.  Key Energy paid the Company $80,000 during the period of January 1, 2016 to March 1, 2016, $572,000 in 2015 and $1,232,000 in 2014 for oilfield service equipment and for parts and service. Such sales and service were in the ordinary course of business of the Company.


The Company is a 50% owner of The Hollywood Camp, L.L.C. (“The Hollywood Camp”), a company that owns and operates a hunting and fishing facility used by the Company primarily for customer entertainment. The Hollywood Camp allocates lease and lodging expenses to its members based on their usage of the facilities. Key Energy paid The Hollywood Camp $221,000 during the period of January 1, 2016 to March 1, 2016, $1,236,000 in 2015 and $1,634,000 in 2014 for use of the facility. The Company paid The Hollywood Camp $3,143,000$5,110,000 in 2016, $2,830,0002019, $4,523,000 in 20152018 and $2,303,000$3,634,000 in 20142017 for its share of facility expenses.


The husband of Amy D. Husted, Vice President and General Counsel of the Company, is a partner in the law firm of Strasburger & Price, LLP. The Company paid the law firm $779,000 in 2016, $596,000 in 2015 and $1,184,000 in 2014 for legal services in connection with matters in the ordinary course of business of the Company.


The Company is a 50% owner of Bolivar Terminal Co., Inc. (“Bolivar”), a company that provides barge fleeting services (temporary barge storage facilities) in the Houston, Texas area. The Company paid Bolivar $1,314,000$459,000 in 2016, $895,0002019, $461,000 in 20152018 and $561,000$581,000 in 20142017 for barge fleeting services. Such services were in the ordinary course of business of the Company.


David W. Grzebinski, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is a member of the board of directors for ABS, a not-for-profit that provides global classification services to the marine, offshore and gas industries.  The Company paid ABS $1,774,000 in 2019, $1,162,000 in 2018, and $1,081,000 in 2017 to perform audits and surveys of the Company’s vessels in the ordinary course of business of the Company.


96
In January 2019, Amy D. Husted, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company, became a member of the board of directors of Signal Mutual Indemnity Association Ltd (“Signal”), a group self-insurance not-for-profit organization authorized by the U.S. Department of Labor as a longshore worker’s compensation insurance provider.  The Company has been a member of Signal since it was established in 1986.  The Company paid Signal $1,391,000 in 2019 in the ordinary course of business of the Company.



The husband of Ms. Husted is a partner in the law firm ofClark Hill Strasburger. The Company paid the law firm $1,278,000 in 2019, $2,019,000 in 2018 and $830,000 in 2017 for legal services in connection with matters in the ordinary course of business of the Company.

(18) Subsequent Events


On January 29, 2020, the Company signed a definitive agreement to acquire the inland tank barge fleet of Savage Inland Marine, LLC (“Savage”) for approximately $278,000,000 in cash, subject to certain closing adjustments.  Savage’s tank barge fleet consists of 90 inland tank barges with approximately 2.5 million barrels of capacity and 46 inland towboats. Savage primarily moves petrochemicals, refined products, and crude oil on the Mississippi River, its tributaries, and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Savage also operates a significant ship bunkering business as well as barge fleeting services along the Gulf Coast. The closing of the acquisition is expected to occur late in the first quarter of 2020 and is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. The purchase will be financed through additional borrowings.



On January 3, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all the assets of Convoy Servicing Company and Agility Fleet Services, LLC (collectively “Convoy”) for approximately $40,000,000 in cash, before post-closing adjustments.  Convoy is an authorized dealer for Thermo King refrigeration systems for trucks, railroad cars and other land transportation markets for North and East Texas as well as in Colorado.





PART IV


Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

1. Financial Statements


Included in Part III of this report:


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.


Consolidated Balance Sheets, December 31, 20162019 and 2015.2018.


Consolidated Statements of Earnings, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014.2017.


Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014.2017.


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014.2017.


Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014.2017.


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014.
2017.

2. Financial Statement Schedules


All schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.


3. Exhibits


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number
 Description of Exhibit
   
— Securities Purchase Agreement among Kirby Corporation, Higman Marine, Inc. and the parties named therein dated February 4, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017).
 — Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company with all amendments to date (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 ofto the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
   
 — Bylaws of the Company, as amended to date (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 ofto the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
   
10.14.1 — Note Purchase Agreement dated December 13, 2012 among Kirby CorporationSee Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 hereof for provisions of our Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company with all amendments to date and the purchasers named therein relatingBylaws of the Company, as amended to $500,000,000 in Senior Notesdate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13.1 and 3.2, respectively, to the Registrant’s CurrentRegistrant's Annual Report on Form 8-K filed with10-K for the Commission onyear ended December 20, 2012)31, 2014).
   
10.24.2Long-term debt instruments are omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(4) of Regulation S-K. The Registrant will furnish copies of such instruments to the Commission upon request.
 — Credit Agreement dated as of April 30, 2015 among Kirby Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the banks named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 5, 2015).
   
10.3†— First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of June 26, 2017 among Kirby Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the banks named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 28, 2017).
— Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 27, 2019 among Kirby Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the banks named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 2, 2019).
 — Deferred Compensation Plan for Key Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005).
Exhibit
Number
Description of Exhibit
   
10.4† — Annual Incentive Plan Guidelines for 20162019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015)2018).
   
10.5† — Annual Incentive Plan Guidelines for 2017.2020.
   
10.6† — 2000 Nonemployee Director Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016).
   
10.7† — 2005 Stock and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019).
— Nonemployee Director Compensation Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016)March 31, 2018).
   
10.8†— Form of Nonincentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 29, 2005, File No. 001-07615).
10.9†— Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 29, 2005, File No. 001-07615).
10.10†— Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 29, 2005, File No. 001-07615).
10.11†— Nonemployee Director Compensation Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015).
 — Consolidated Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
   
 — Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
   
 — Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
   
 — Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
   
 — Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).


101.INS** Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
   
101.SCH**  Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
   
101.CAL**  Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
   
101.DEF**  Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document
   
101.LAB**  Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
   
101.PRE**  Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104*
— Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)


*Filed herewith.
**These exhibits are furnished herewith. In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulations S-T, these exhibits are not deemed to be filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are not deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.
Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.



SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 KIRBY CORPORATION
 (REGISTRANT)
   
 By:/s/ C. ANDREW SMITHWILLIAM G. HARVEY
  C. Andrew SmithWilliam G. Harvey
  Executive Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer
   
Dated: February 23, 201721, 2020  

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature Capacity Date
     
/s/ JOSEPH H. PYNE Chairman of the Board and Director February 23, 201721, 2020
Joseph H. Pyne    
     
/s/ DAVID W. GRZEBINSKI President, Chief Executive Officer, and February 23, 201721, 2020
David W. Grzebinski and Director  
  (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/ C. ANDREW SMITHWILLIAM G. HARVEY Executive Vice President and February 23, 201721, 2020
C. Andrew SmithWilliam G. Harvey Chief Financial Officer  
  (Principal Financial Officer)  
     
/s/ RONALD A. DRAGG Vice President, Controller and February 23, 201721, 2020
Ronald A. Dragg Assistant Secretary  
  (Principal Accounting Officer)  
     
/s/ ANNE-MARIE N. AINSWORTH Director February 23, 201721, 2020
Anne-Marie N. Ainsworth    
     
/s/ RICHARD J. ALARIO Director February 23, 201721, 2020
Richard J. Alario
/s/ TANYA S. BEDERDirectorFebruary 21, 2020
Tanya S. Beder    
     
/s/ BARRY E. DAVIS Director February 23, 201721, 2020
Barry E. Davis    
     
/s/ C. SEAN DAY Director February 23, 201721, 2020
C. Sean Day    
     
/s/ MONTE J. MILLER Director February 23, 201721, 2020
Monte J. Miller    
     
/s/ RICHARD R. STEWART Director February 23, 201721, 2020
Richard R. Stewart    
     
/s/ WILLIAM M. WATERMAN Director February 23, 201721, 2020
William M. Waterman    





EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number
Description of Exhibit
Annual Incentive Plan Guidelines for 2017.
Consolidated Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).
101.INS**XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document
101.LAB**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*Filed herewith
**These exhibits are furnished herewith. In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these exhibits are not deemed to be filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are not deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.
Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.
100