UNITED STATES
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.  20549


FORM 10-K


ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192020
or


TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to ______.


Commission File No.0-30379


graphic

CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Nevada 88-0425691
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
 555 Wireless, Boulevard, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (631) (631)924-1135


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class Trading Symbol Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value CEMI The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes  No 


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  No 


Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to it’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes    No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes    No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  Yes   No


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer 
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
 
Emerging growth company


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes No


As of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates was $106,974,102.$0.


As of  March 4, 2020,11, 2021, the registrant had 17,733,61720,182,357 shares of common stock outstanding.


Documents Incorporated By Reference

Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement for its 2020 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

  Page
PART I 
 
ITEM 1.54
ITEM 1A.1614
ITEM 2.4038
ITEM 3.4038
PART II  
ITEM 5.4139
ITEM 7.4240
ITEM 8.5147
ITEM 9A.5147
PART III  
ITEM 10.5348
ITEM 11.5348
ITEM 12.5348
ITEM 13.5348
ITEM 14.5348
PART IV  
ITEM 15.5449
 5550

Unless the context requires otherwise, the words “our,” “our‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ ‘‘our,’’ ‘‘our company,” “us,” “we”’’ ‘‘Chembio’’ and similar terms refer to Chembio Diagnostics, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

DPP, SAMPLETAINER, STAT-PAK, STAT-VIEW and SURE CHECK are our registered trademarks, and CHEMBIO and MICRO READER are our trademarks. For convenience, these trademarks appear in this prospectus supplementinthis report without ® and ™ symbols, butand that practice does not mean that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights to the trademarks. This report also includes trademarks and service marks owned by other organizations.


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND STATISTICAL ESTIMATES

This report contains statements reflecting our views about our future performance that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are generally identified through the inclusion of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “could,” “estimate,,“estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “may,” “objective,” “outlook,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “strategy,” “target,” “will,” “would” or variations of such words or similar expressions. All statements addressing our future operating performance, and statements addressing events and developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based upon currently available information, operating plans, and projections about future events and trends.

This report contains estimates, projections and other data concerning our industry, our business and the markets for our products. Where expressly stated, we obtained this industry, business, market and other data from reports, research surveys, studies and similar data prepared by the World Health Organization, or WHO. We also include data that we have compiled, obtained, identified or otherwise derived from reports, research surveys, studies and similar data prepared by market research firms and other third parties, industry, medical and general publications, government data and similar sources. Other than WHO, we do not expressly refer to the sources from which this data is derived.

Forward-looking statements and statistical estimates inherently involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted or expressed in this report. These risks and uncertainties include those described below in “ItemPart I, Item 1A. Risk Factors.“Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March X, 2020, in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2020, in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2020, and in Part II, Item 1A, . “Risk Factors” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2020, and in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors, of this report. You should interpret many of the risks identified in these reports as being heightened as a result of the ongoing and numerous adverse impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or statistical estimates, which speak only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statistical estimate, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

4
3

PART I

ITEM 1.
BUSINESS

Overview

We are a leading provider ofdevelop, manufacture and commercialize point-of-care diagnostic productstests for the detection and diagnosis of infectious diseases. We have been expanding ourdiseases, including COVID‑19, sexually transmitted disease, and fever and tropical disease.

Our product portfolio is based upon our proprietary Dual Path Platform, which we refer to as DPP which usestechnology, a small drop of blood from the fingertip to providediagnostic platform that provides high-quality, cost-effective diagnostic results in approximately 15 minutes. We seek to build additional revenue streams by entering into technology collaborations with leading global healthcare companies to leverage the DPP technology platform.
Compared with traditional lateral flow technology, the DPP technology platform provides enhanced sensitivity20 minutes using fingertip blood, nasal swabs and specificity, advanced multiplexing capabilities, and, when used with the DPP Micro Reader, quantitative results. Our DPP test for human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV, provides sensitivity of 99.8% and specificity of 100%, and has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and cleared as a waived test under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, or CLIA.
On November 6, 2018, we completed our acquisition of opTricon GmbH, a Berlin-based developer and manufacturer of handheld analyzers for rapid diagnostic tests, which we believe will enable us to promote DPP tests and DPP Micro Readers more actively across global markets. On November 25, 2019, we completed our acquisition of Orangelife Comercio e Industria Ltda., a Brazilian manufacturer of lateral flow tests for infectious diseases to diversify our market channel penetration in Brazil and support Bio-Manguinos, a major customer.
We are pursuing three corporate priorities, the key building blocks to drive growth and operating efficiency: (1) expand our commercialization; (2) advance our research and development pipeline; and (3) prepare for future growth.
Industry
other sample types. The DPP technology platform addresses the lateral flowrapid diagnostic test market, which includes infectious diseases, cardiac markers, cholesterol and lipids, pregnancy and fertility, and drugs of abuse. Based on our review of third-party reports and other information, we estimateCompared with traditional lateral flow technology, the DPP technology platform can provide:

Enhanced sensitivity and specificity: This is achieved via our patented approach to separating the sample path from the buffer path, together with other patented and proprietary strategies, than traditional lateral flow tests. It also delivers lower levels of detection.

Advanced multiplexing capabilities: Through advanced multiplexing, the DPP platform can detect and differentiate up to eight distinct test results from a single patient sample, which can deliver greater clinical value than other rapid tests.

Quantitative results: For some diagnostic applications, our easy-to-use, highly portable, battery-operated DPP Micro Reader optical analyzers can report accurate results in approximately 15 seconds, making it well-suited for decentralized testing where real-time results enable patients to be clinically assessed while they are still onsite. Objective results produced by the DPP Micro Reader can reduce the possibility of the types of human error that can be experienced in the visual interpretations required by many rapid tests.

We target the market for lateral flowrapid diagnostic test solutions for infectious diseases, which is driven by the high prevalence of infectious diseases globally, an increase in the geriatric population, growing demand for rapid test results, and advancements in multiplexing. We have a broad portfolio of infectious disease products, which prior to 2020 were focused principally on sexually transmitted disease and fever and tropical disease. For example, in June 2020 we received FDA clearance of our 510(k) submission for the DPP Zika IgM System, which consists of an antibody test for Zika IgM and a DPP Micro Reader and which had previously received an FDA Emergency Use Authorization or EUA. In October 2020 the DPP HIV-Syphilis System, an antibody test system for the human immunodeficiency virus or HIV and Treponema pallidum bacteria (the causative agent of syphilis), received FDA approval for a Premarket Approval, or PMA, application.

In February 2020 we began the process of shifting substantially all of our resources to leverage the DPP technology platform to address the acute and escalating need for diagnostic testing for COVID-19.

COVID-19 antibody test system: We initially refocused our business strategy on the development and commercialization of the DPP COVID-19 IgM/IgG System, which consisted of a new serological test for COVID-19 and a DPP Micro Reader that could provide separate numerical readings for both IgM and IgG levels of antibodies to the virus. We acquired three regulatory approvals of the DPP COVID-19 IgM/IgG system in our targeted global testing market: an EUA, granted by the FDA in April 2020; an approval for emergency use issued by Brazil’s Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, or ANVISA, in April 2020, and a CE Marking for the European Union obtained in early May 2020. In June 2020 the FDA revoked the EUA for the DPP COVID-19 IgM/IgG system. In September 2020 we submitted to the FDA an EUA application for the DPP SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG System, a new rapid antibody test system that detected COVID-19 antibodies using a different methodology that was consistent with updated FDA guidance, but in December 2020 the FDA notified us that it was declining to review the new system based on the FDA’s then-effective prioritization guidance, under which review of the system was not a priority because, for example, the FDA determined that authorization of the tests would have relatively limited impact on testing accessibility or testing capacity.

COVID-19 antigen test system: In July 2020 we received a $628,071 grant, the First BARDA Grant, from the Department of Health and Human Services; Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response; Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Division of Research Innovation and Ventures, or BARDA, to assist us in developing, submitting and obtaining an EUA application for a COVID-19 point-of-care antigen system using DPP technology. In October 2020, with BARDA’s support in accordance with its grant, we submitted to the FDA an EUA application for the DPP SARS‑CoV‑2 Antigen System, a test system that consists of a DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen test cartridge, a DPP Micro Reader optical analyzer and a minimally invasive nasal swab. In December 2020 we received a $12.7 million grant from BARDA, in part to support preparation, submission, and approval of FDA 510(k) clearance for the DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen System. In January 2021 the FDA notified us that it was declining to review the DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen System based on its updated prioritization guidance, under which review of the system was not a priority. The FDA has supplementally advised us of the type and nature of information it would need to receive in a subsequent EUA application in order for the DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen System to be prioritized for review, and we are engaged in testing and development in order to submit a new EUA application for a COVID-19 antigen test system.

4

COVID-19 and Influenza respiratory antigen panel test system: BARDA’s $12.7 million grant in December 2020 also supported our development, submission and receipt of an EUA for a rapid, multiplex respiratory antigen panel point-of-care test system using DPP technology. We are currently seeking to develop and conduct clinical trials of the DPP Respiratory Antigen Panel, a test system being designed to provide simultaneous, discrete and differential detection of Influenza A, Influenza B and SARS-CoV-2 antigens from a single patient respiratory specimen, such as a nasal swab, in approximately 20 minutes. The system is intended to enable appropriate clinical management of patients with suspected respiratory infections and to assist in the containment of COVID-19 cases during the flu season. This test system is expected to provide results in approximately 20 minutes and to be run on the DPP Micro Reader.

For additional information about our existing and proposed product offerings, please see “—Products” below.

Our products are sold globally, directly and through distributors, to medical laboratories and hospitals, governmental and public health entities, non-governmental organizations, medical professionals, and retail establishments. We continue to seek to expand our commercial distribution channels.

The extensive economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, exacerbated by the market and regulatory complications we faced in seeking to develop and commercialize a portfolio of COVID-19 test systems, was reflected in our operating results for 2020, as total revenues were $32.5 million, a decrease of 5.8% from 2019, and net product sales were $24.8 million, a decrease of 14.1% from 2019. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Consolidated Results of Operations.”

In 2020 we continued to invest in automating our test manufacturing processes, all of which are now based in the United States. Among other actions, we expanded our manufacturing capabilities by validating and implementing automated lines. Our transition from manual to automated assembly is intended to add capacity, reduce variable costs and improve product margins. In order to address challenging economic conditions and implement our business strategy, we continued to execute a program to reduce operating expenses and better align our costs with revenues, including by eliminating positions that were no longer aligned with our strategy. Our cash and cash equivalents totaled $23.1 million at December 31, 2020, compared to $18.3 million at December 31, 2019.

Industry

The DPP technology platform targets diagnostic disease states; (1) where rapid diagnosis impacts patient treatment and outcomes; (2) that are underserved by current diagnostic products due to performance or availability; and (3) that present opportunities regionally, demographically or clinically. We are focused on test solutions associated with infectious diseases: respiratory viruses, sexually transmitted diseases, gastroenterology and insect-vector diseases.

Our product portfolio is marketed globally to NGO’s, Ministries of Health, acute care hospitals, reference labs, outpatient clinics including urgent cares and physician offices. Our branded products have secured meaningful market share globally and include, SURE CHECK, STAT-PAK and DPP. We will increase from $5.5 billion in 2017focus on internally developed products and pursue external opportunities to $8.2 billion in 2022, representing a compound annual growth ratelicense novel technologies and products with the intent of 8.2%.leveraging our growing commercial infrastructure.

Infectious disease tests constitute the largest and fastest growing, segment of the lateral flow test market. We currently are targeting lateral flowrapid diagnostic test solutions for infectious diseases: respiratory diseases, sexually transmitted diseasediseases, gastroenterology and mosquito-borne disease.insect-vector diseases. The market for lateral flowrapid diagnostic infectious disease tests is being driven by the high prevalence of infectious diseases globally, an increase in the geriatric population, growing demand for rapid test results, and advancements in multiplexing. Based on our review

Products

We develop, manufacture and commercialize point-of-care tests for the detection and diagnosis of third-party reportsinfectious diseases, including COVID‑19, sexually transmitted disease, and other information, we estimate thatinsect-vector diseases. We target the market for rapid diagnostic test solutions for infectious diseases, which is driven by the high prevalence of infectious diseases globally, an increase in the geriatric population, growing demand for rapid test results, and advancements in multiplexing.

Much of our product portfolio is based upon our proprietary DPP technology, a diagnostic platform that provides high-quality, cost-effective results in 15 to 20 minutes using fingertip blood, nasal swabs and other sample types. The DPP technology platform addresses the rapid diagnostic test market, which includes infectious diseases, cardiac markers, cholesterol and lipids, pregnancy and fertility, and drugs of abuse. Compared with traditional lateral flow infectious disease tests will increase from $1.4 billion in 2017 to $2.3 billion in 2022, representing a compound annual growth rate of 10.7%.technology, the DPP technology platform can provide:

Enhanced sensitivity and specificity: This is achieved via our patented approach to separating the sample path from the buffer path, together with other patented and proprietary strategies, than traditional lateral flow tests. It also delivers lower levels of detection.

5

Products

Advanced multiplexing capabilities: Through advanced multiplexing, the DPP platform can detect and differentiate up to eight distinct test results from a single patient sample, which can deliver greater clinical value than other rapid tests.

Quantitative results: For some diagnostic applications, our easy-to-use, highly portable, battery-operated DPP Micro Reader optical analyzers can report accurate results in approximately 15 seconds, making it well-suited for decentralized testing where real-time results enable patients to be clinically assessed while they are still onsite. Objective results produced by the DPP Micro Reader can reduce the possibility of the types of human error that can be experienced in the visual interpretations required by many rapid tests.

Our point-of-careCOVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems
Prior to 2020, our broad portfolio of infectious disease portfolio is comprised of multiple commercial products each serving unique customer requirements. The key advantageswas focused principally on sexually transmitted disease and fever and tropical disease. In 2020 we shifted substantially all of our products,resources to leverage the DPP technology platform to address the acute and escalating need for diagnostic testing for COVID-19.

COVID-19 Antibody Test System

Beginning in February 2020 we refocused our business strategy on the development and commercialization of a COVID-19 antibody test system based on DPP technology. We initially developed the DPP COVID-19 IgM/IgG System, which consisted of a new serological test for COVID-19 and a DPP Micro Reader that could provide separate numerical readings for both IgM and IgG levels of antibodies to the CORONA-19 virus. We acquired three regulatory approvals of the DPP COVID-19 IgM/IgG System in our targeted global testing market: an EUA, granted by the FDA in April 2020; an approval for emergency use issued by Brazil’s Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, or ANVISA, in April 2020, and a CE Marking for the European Union obtained in early May 2020. In June 2020, however, the FDA revoked the EUA for the DPP COVID-19 IgM/IgG System.

In the second quarter of 2020 we began shipping the DPP COVID-19 IgM/IgG System to fulfill a $4 million purchase order from Bio-Manguinhos, a long-standing customer that is a subsidiary of the foundation responsible for the development and production of vaccines, diagnostics and biopharmaceuticals for Brazil’s national public health system.

In September 2020 we submitted to the FDA an EUA application for the DPP SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG System, a new rapid antibody test system that detected COVID-19 antibodies using a different methodology that was consistent with updated FDA guidance. In December 2020 the FDA notified us that it was declining to review the DPP SARS-CoV- 2 IgM/IgG System based on the FDA’s then-effective prioritization guidance. Under this guidance, review of the system was not a priority for the FDA because, for example, the FDA determined that authorization of the tests would have relatively limited impact on testing accessibility or testing capacity. The FDA has supplementally advised us of the type and nature of information it would need to receive in a subsequent EUA application in order for the DPP SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG System to be prioritized for review. We are performedcontinuing to evaluate whether to commit further resources to the testing and development that would be required in order to seek to submit a new EUA application for a COVID-19 antibody test system.

In January 2021 we announced the CE mark for the DPP SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG test system, providing regulatory approval to register and market the test systems in the European Union and other geographies that accept the CE mark.

COVID-19 Antigen Test System

In mid-2020 we began to focus on the development of a COVID-19 antigen test system based on DPP technology. In July 2020 we received a $628,071 grant from BARDA to assist us in developing, submitting and obtaining an EUA application for, a COVID-19 point-of-care antigen system. In October 2020, with BARDA’s support in accordance with its grant, we submitted to the FDA an EUA application for the DPP SARS‑CoV‑2 Antigen System, a tiny droptest system that consists of blooda DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen test cartridge, a DPP Micro Reader optical analyzer and a minimally invasive nasal swab.

In November 2020 ANVISA approved the DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen test system for use in Brazil.

In December 2020 we received a $12.7 million grant from BARDA, in part to support preparation of a submission in pursuit of FDA 510(k) clearance for the fingertipDPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen System.

In January 2021 the FDA notified us that it was declining to review the DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen System based on its updated prioritization guidance, under which review of the system was not a priority. The FDA has supplementally advised us of the type and nature of information it would need to receive in a subsequent EUA application in order for the DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen System to be prioritized for review, and we are engaged in testing and development in order to submit a new EUA application for a COVID-19 antigen test system.

In January 2021 we announced the CE mark for the DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen test system, providing regulatory approval to register and market the test systems in the European Union and other geographies that accept the CE mark.

6

COVID-19 and Influenza Respiratory Antigen Panel Test System

In the fourth quarter of 2020 we began developing a rapid, multiplex respiratory antigen panel point-of-care test system using DPP technology. BARDA designated a portion of its $12.7 million grant in December 2020 for use to support our development, submission and receipt of an EUA for this system.

We are currently seeking to develop and conduct clinical trials of the DPP Respiratory Antigen Panel, a test system being designed to provide simultaneous, discrete and differential detection of Influenza A, Influenza B and SARS-CoV-2 antigens from a single patient respiratory specimen, such as a nasal swab, in approximately 20 minutes. The system is intended to enable appropriate clinical management of patients with suspected respiratory infections and to assist in the containment of COVID-19 cases during the flu season. This test system is expected to provide results in approximately 1520 minutes include:
enhanced sensitivity and specificity;
advanced multiplexing; and
quantitative results, when used withto be run on the DPP Micro Reader.

To enhance our offered product line quickly, we signed an in-licensing agreement to distribute a visual-read, point- of-care, EUA-approved respiratory panel for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigens, Influenza A and Influenza B. This offering is scheduled to launch in March 2021.

Legacy Products

We have obtained FDA approvals and, directly or through our partners, international regulatory approvals for infectious disease tests as follows:

Product (Assay)U.S.International
DPP COVID-19 IgM/IgG System
DPP HIV 1/2 Assay
DPP HIV-Syphilis System
DPP Syphilis Screen & Confirm Assay
DPP ZCD IgM/IgG System
DPP Dengue NS1 Antigen System
DPP Dengue IgM/IgG System 
DPP Zika IgM System
DPP LeishmaniasisZika IgM/IgG System 
STAT-PAK DPP Chikungunya System
DPP Ebola Antigen System
EUA
DPP Leishmaniasis Assay
HIV 1/2 STAT-PAK Assay
Chagas STAT-PAK ChagasAssay 
SURE CHECK HIV 1/2 Assay
SURE CHECK HIV 1/2 Self TestSelf-Test 

Organic growth in our core infectious disease business is being driven by:

growth in the overall market for rapid diagnostic infectious disease tests;
our increased market penetration in existing markets and channels, including in the United States, Latin America, and Europe;
our registration of existing and new products in unchartered countries and regions, such as selected countries in Latin America and Southeast Asia;
our entry into new market segments, such as respiratory tests and international HIV Self-Testing; and
advances in our product pipeline in infectious disease with key products including a tests for COVID-19, a  multiplex test for HIV and syphilis in the U.S. market and tests for dengue, zika and chikungunya.
growth in the overall market for lateral flow infectious disease tests, which we estimate will increase at a compound annual growth rate of 10.7% through 2022 (see “–Industry” above);
our increased market penetration in existing markets and channels, including in the United States, Latin America, Africa and Europe;
our registration of existing and new products in unchartered countries and regions, such as selected countries in Latin America and Southeast Asia;
our entry into new market segments, such as international HIV Self-Testing; and
advances in our product pipeline in infectious disease with key products including a multiplex test for HIV and syphilis in the U.S. market and tests for dengue, zika and chikungunya.
We market and sell both stand-alone and multiplex tests for sexually transmitted infectious diseases, such as HIV and syphilis. HIV and syphilis continue to be major global public health issues. According to WHO estimates:

HIV has claimed more than 35 million lives, including 770,000 in 2018. Approximately 37.9 million people were living with HIV at the end of 2018, and 1.7 million were newly infected during 2018.
There were 18.0 million prevalent cases of syphilis as of 2012, and 5.6 million new infections were estimated to occur annually.
Elimination of mother-to-child transmission, or MTCT, of both HIV and syphilis is a global health priority. In 2013, 1.9 million pregnant women were infected with syphilis worldwide. Congenital syphilis contributes significantly to infant mortality, accounting for 305,000 annual perinatal deaths worldwide in 2013. Globally, more than 1.4 million pregnant women were infected with HIV as of 2015, and MTCT of HIV is estimated to have resulted in over 150,000 infant cases in 2015.

HIV has claimed more than 35 million lives, including 770,000 in 2018. Approximately 37.9 million people were living with HIV at the end
7

There were 18.0 million prevalent cases of syphilis as of 2012, and 5.6 million new infections were estimated to occur annually.
Elimination of mother-to-child transmission, or MTCT, of both HIV and syphilis is a global health priority. In 2013, 1.9 million pregnant women were infected with syphilis worldwide. Congenital syphilis contributes significantly to infant mortality, accounting for 305,000 annual perinatal deaths worldwide in 2013. Globally, more than 1.4 million pregnant women were infected with HIV as of 2015, and MTCT of HIV is estimated to have resulted in over 150,000 infant cases in 2015.
We are seeking to address the global concerns related to HIV and syphilis co-infection through the development of a novel, multiplex test for both HIV and syphilis. We have developed a DPP HIV-Syphilis multiplex test and received regulatory approvals coveringin the United States and a number of international markets, including Brazil, Europe, Malaysia and Mexico. InWe are pursuing a CLIA waiver for the United States we completed a DPP HIV-Syphilis clinical trial but in February 2020 received a “not approvable” letter from the FDA with respect to our Premarket Approval, or PMA, application on our DPP HIV-Syphilis multiplex test for commercial usetests in the United States. The FDA has confirmed that, of the items that had been open for review in the PMA application, the syphilis arm of the study was acceptable, as were the results as they relate to the inclusion of pregnant women. The only remaining item requested of us was to repeat the reproducibility study, as one of the sites in the trial reported greater variability compared to the other sites. We have initiated the reproducibility study required by the FDA and, in parallel, accelerated the studies for a CLIA waiver, which can be submitted upon FDA approval of the PMA application. We believe we continue to be well-positioned to be the first company to introduce a multiplex rapid test for HIV and syphilis in the United States.

We also market and sell tests for selected fever and tropical diseases such as Chagas, ebola, leishmaniasis and Zika. The market for lateral flow mosquito-bornerapid diagnostic insect-vector diseases includes established markets for disease such as dengue and malaria, which WHO estimates together account for more than 600 million annual infections worldwide. There are also a number of emerging markets for lateral flowrapid diagnostic tests for infectious diseases such as burkholderia, chikungunya, lassa, leptospirosis, Marburg, rickettsia and Zika. We are developing tests, using the DPP platform, to detect all of the aforementioned fever and tropical diseases, as stand-alone or multiplex tests.

Since 2015 we have received over $12.2$14.2 million of funding from some of the world’s leading health organizations, which has helped us accelerate the expansion of our pipeline of infectious disease tests. Our collaborators have included Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, The Paul G. Allen Family Foundation, The Oswaldo Cruz Foundation or FIOCRUZ, and the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, or FIND, as well as U.S. government agencies such as Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or BARDA, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or USDA.


Several tests in our infectious disease pipeline are approaching commercialization, and several have received initial regulatory approvals:

ProductCollaborator
Phase I
Feasibility
Phase II
Development
Phase III
Verification &Validation&
Validation
Phase IV
Clinical &
Regulatory
Phase V
Commercial
Launch
DPP HIV-Syphilis System (US)Self-funded PMA/510K pendingPMA approved
DPP Dengue IgM/IgG (International)Self-funded
 CE and ANVISA1
DPP Dengue NS1 Antigen (International)Self-funded CE and ANVISA pending
DPP Zika IgM/IgG (International)SystemSelf-fundedCE and ANVISA
DPP Chikungunya IgM/IgG  (International)Dengue NS1 Antigen SystemSelf-fundedCE and ANVISA pending
DPP ZCDChikungunya IgM/IgG(International)IgG SystemSelf-fundedCE and ANVISA
DPP Zika IgM (US)Chikungunya Dengue IgM/IgG SystemBARDASelf-funded
 FDA-EUA2 FDA
CE and ANVISA
DPP Ebola Antigen SystemCDCFDA-EUA
DPP Fever Assay AsiaFINDField studies ongoing
DPP Fever Assay AfricaPaul Allen Foundation

1
Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Brazil)
2
Emergency Use Authorization
Collaborations
We are building additional revenue streams by leveraging our patented DPP technology and scientific expertise through collaborations. Leading global healthcare organizations have chosen to collaborate with us based on our deep scientific expertise with our proven DPP technology platform and capabilities, our successful record of developing DPP tests with a diverse set of collaborators including global commercial companies, governments and non-governmental organizations, and our extensive experience in obtaining regulatory approvals in the United States (FDA), Brazil (ANVISA), the European Union (CE mark) and Mexico (Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios, or COFEPRIS) as well as from WHO (Prequalification, or PQ).
ProductCollaborator
Phase I
 Feasibility
Phase II
 Development
Phase III
Verification
&Validation
Phase IV
Clinical/
Regulatory
Phase V
Commercial
Launch
DPP Rare Disease (undisclosed biomarker)Takeda
Infectious Disease PortfolioLumira DX  
DPP Biomarker Development Project (undisclosed biomarker)Fever Assay MalaysiaAstraZenecaSelf-funded ✓
 CE Mark3
DPP TBI
Perseus 

3
For use in pharmaceutical research
By leveraging our DPP technology platform, we are creating opportunities to expand into new markets such as cancer diagnostics, concussion and traumatic brain injury, and veterinary and we are broadening the application of our technology from point-of-care diagnostics to include companion diagnostics. Research and development costs related to the collaborations are fully funded by our collaborators.

Sales Channels

Our products are sold globally, both directly and through distributors, to hospitals and clinics, physician offices, clinical laboratories, public health organizations, government agencies and consumers. Historically we marketed and sold our products only into a handful of countries and regions. In recent yearsDuring 2020, we have hiredexpanded our U.S.-based sales, executivescustomer service, and marketing team to begin building our own channels in key markets such asfocus on the United States, Europe, Latin America, AfricaCOVID-19, HIV-Syphilis, and Southeast Asia.future DPP platform product opportunities. With sales growth as an underlying objective, we are focused on increasing sales in existing geographies expandingthat support higher average selling prices. From lead generation through technical inquiries, Chembio has the internal resources to support customers through the commercial process including marketing, sales, into new geographies,sales support, order entry and broadening sales coverage in key markets.product support.  Our goal is to delight our global customers through all facets of our commercial interactions.
Automation of U.S. Manufacturing

We are automating our U.S. manufacturing processes and expanding our manufacturing capacity. During 2018,Over the past two years, we tookhave taken delivery of and completed validation of most of our first automated manufacturing line. This automated manufacturing line provided DPP test production for Brazil and will allow assembly of various configurations of DPP tests. The automated line has an annual capacity of between five and ten million tests, depending on the test configuration, and useslines. These use vision-guided, robotic operation to improve inspection and quality control. During 2019, we took delivery of our second and third manufacturing lines that together, following commissioning and regulatory approvals, will support our other product platforms. As we transition from manual to automated assembly, we believe the reduced variable costs will improve product gross margins.

DPP Technology & Development

Our commercially available products employ either our patented DPP technology or traditional lateral flow technology. We believe products developed using our DPP technology can provide superior diagnostic performance compared with products that utilize traditional lateral flow technology.

Chembio’s history of collaborations has proven the strength and capabilities of the DPP platform to address a diverse range of biomarkers. We are executingnow focusing our strategyR&D resources on delivering products to leveragebuild a portfolio of COVID-19 tests, Chembio’s new and expanded product portfolio will emphasize high value added tests with strong margins, selling in developed markets, established sales channels, and clinically accepted use cases, where the differentiated capabilities of DPP intellectual property, as well as our scientific and operational expertise, to create new collaborations where we will serve as an exclusive development and manufacturing partner. Examples of such collaborations include the following:provide a competitive advantage.
In January 2015, we entered into an agreement with the Concussion Science Group (CSG) Division of Perseus Science Group LLC to develop a point-of-care diagnostic test for traumatic brain injury, including sports-related concussions, utilizing both our DPP and optical analyzer technologies.
In October 2017, we signed a biomarker development project agreement with AstraZeneca, utilizing both our DPP and optical analyzer technologies.
In April 2018, we entered into a collaboration agreement with LumiraDx to develop new point-of-care diagnostic tests for infectious diseases. Under terms of the agreement, we receive funding from LumiraDx, subject to satisfying certain milestones, to develop certain new point-of-care infectious disease tests. Following the regulatory approval and commercialization of tests in accordance with this agreement, Chembio will both sell reagents to, and receive royalty payments from, LumiraDx on sales of all products developed through this collaboration.
In November 2018, we acquired opTricon (Berlin, Germany), a leading developer of handheld optical analyzers rapid diagnostic tests.

In July 2019, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, to develop a novel point-of-care diagnostic test to detect an undisclosed biomarker.8
In November 2019, we acquired Orangelife Comercio e Industria Ltda. (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), a privately held manufacturer of lateral flow test for infectious diseases, to expand our market penetration and support Bio-Manguinhos, a major customer.

Competition

Many of our competitors are significantly larger and have greater financial, research, manufacturing, and marketing resources. Important competitive factors include product quality, analytical performance, ease of use, price, customer service and reputation. Industry competition is based on these and the following additional factors:

patent protection;
scientific expertise;
ability to develop and market products and processes;
ability to obtain required regulatory approvals;
ability to manufacture cost-effective products that meet applicable regulatory requirements;
access to adequate capital; and,
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel.
patent protection;
scientific expertise;
ability to develop and market products and processes;
ability to obtain required regulatory approvals;
ability to manufacture cost-effective products that meet applicable regulatory requirements;
access to adequate capital; and,
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel.

We believe our scientific capabilities and proprietary know-how relating to our patented DPP technology and lateral flowrapid diagnostic technology are very strong, particularly for the development and manufacture of tests for the detection of  antibodies to infectious diseases, and other diseases.
Our ability to develop and market other products is in large measure dependent on our having additional resources and/or collaborative relationships.  Some of our product development efforts have been funded on a project or milestone basis.  We believe that our proprietary know-how relating to our patented DPP technology has been instrumental in our obtaining the collaborations we have and that we continue to pursue.  We believe that our patent protection enhances our ability to both develop more profitable, collaborative relationships and expand licensing revenue. However, there are a number of competitive technologies used and/or seeking to be used by others in point-of-care settings.

Although we have no specific knowledge of any other competitors’ products that could render our products obsolete, if we fail to maintain and enhance our competitive position or fail to introduce new products and product features, our customers may decide to use the products developed by our competitors, which could result in a loss of revenues and cash flow.

Employees

As of December 31, 2019,2020, we had 324355 full-time equivalent employees, of whom 3539 were in administration, 230262 were in manufacturing, 4232 were in research and development, and 1722 were in sales and marketing and customer service. Of these employees, approximately 256320 were located in the United States, 300 were located in Malaysia, 19 were located in Germany and 1916 were located in Brazil.

We have never had a work stoppage, and none of our employees are represented by a labor organization or subject to any collective bargaining arrangements. We consider our employee relations to be good.

In January 2021, Chembio announced a restructuting plan in the US and reduced its workforce by approximately 9%, as further discussed on Note 16 - Subsequent Events.

Governmental Regulation

Certain of our activities are subject to regulatory oversight by the FDA under provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and regulations thereunder, including regulations governing the development, marketing, labeling, promotion, manufacturing, and export of diagnostic products. Our clinical laboratory customers are subject to oversight by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, pursuant to CLIA, as well as agencies in various states. Failure to comply with applicable requirements can lead to sanctions, including withdrawal of products from the market, recalls, refusal to authorize government contracts, product seizures, civil money penalties, injunctions, and criminal prosecution.

FDA Approval/Clearance Requirements

Unless an exemption applies, each medical device that we market or wish to market in the United States must receive 510(k) clearance or Premarket Approval, or PMA. Medical devices that receive 510(k) clearance are “cleared” by the FDA to market, distribute, and sell in the United States. Medical devices that obtain a PMA by the FDA are “approved” to market, distribute and sell in the United States. We cannot be certain that 510(k) clearance or PMA approval will ever be obtained for any products that have not already obtained 510(k) clearance or PMA approval. Descriptions of the PMA and 510(k) clearance processes are provided below.
The FDA decides whether a device line must undergo either the 510(k) clearance or PMA based on statutory criteria that utilize a risk-based classification system. PMA is the FDA process of scientific and regulatory review to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Class III medical devices and, in many cases, Class II medical devices. Class III devices are those that support or sustain human life, are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, or which present a potential, unreasonable risk of illness or injury. The FDA uses these criteria to decide whether a PMA or a 510(k) is appropriate, including the level of risk that the agency perceives is associated with the device and a determination by the agency of whether the product is a type of device that is similar to devices that are already legally marketed. Devices deemed to pose relatively less risk are placed in either Class I or II. In many cases, the FDA requires the manufacturer to submit a 510(k) requesting clearance (also referred to as a premarket notification), unless an exemption applies. The 510(k) must demonstrate that the manufacturer’s proposed device is “substantially equivalent” in intended use and in safety and effectiveness to a legally marketed predicate device. A “predicate device” is a pre-existing medical device to which equivalence can be drawn, that is either in Class I or Class II or is a Class III device that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, for which the FDA has not yet called for submission of a PMA application.

Device classification depends on the device’s intended use and its indications for use. In addition, classification is risk-based, that is, the risk the device poses to the patient and/or the user is a major factor in determining the class to which it is assigned. Class I includes devices with the lowest risk and Class III includes those with the greatest risk.

Class I devices are those for which safety and effectiveness can be assured by adherence to the FDA’s general regulatory controls for medical devices, or the General Controls, which include compliance with the applicable portions of the FDA’s quality system regulations, facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and appropriate, truthful and non-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials. Some Class I devices also require premarket clearance by the FDA through the 510(k) process described below.

Class II devices are subject to the FDA’s General Controls, and any other special controls as deemed necessary by the FDA to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device. Premarket review and clearance by the FDA for Class II devices is accomplished through the 510(k) process. Pursuant to the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002, unless a specific exemption applies, 510(k) submissions are subject to user fees. Certain Class II devices are exempt from this premarket review process.

Class III includes devices with the greatest risk. Devices in this class must meet all of the requirements in Classes I and II. In addition, Class III devices cannot be marketed until they receive Premarket Approval.

The safety and effectiveness of Class III devices cannot be assured solely by the General Controls and the other requirements described above. These devices require formal clinical studies to demonstrate safety and effectiveness. Under Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002, PMA applications (and supplemental premarket approval applications) are subject to significantly higher user fees than 510(k) applications, and they also require considerably more time and resources.

Rapid HIV tests intended for diagnostic use are regulated as Class III devices. Responsibility for assuring the safety and effectiveness of these tests lies within the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research’s Office of Blood Research and Review, with oversight by the Blood Products Advisory Committee. Approved rapid HIV tests must meet the regulations in the 21 CFR 800 series subparts, under the investigational device exemption, or IDE and PMA pathways.
Premarket Approval Pathway

We manufacture, market and distribute three rapid HIV tests in the United States. Our HIV 1/2 STAT-PAK Assay, SURE CHECK HIV 1/2 Assay, and DPP HIV 1/2 Assay all have received FDA PMA approval. A PMA application must be supported by extensive data including, but not limited to, analytical, preclinical, clinical trials, manufacturing, statutory preapproval inspections, and labeling to demonstrate to the FDA’s satisfaction the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use. Before a PMA is submitted, a manufacturer must apply for an IDE. If the device presents a “significant risk,” as defined by the FDA, to human health, the FDA requires the device sponsor to file an IDE application with the FDA and obtain IDE approval prior to initiation of enrollment of human subjects for clinical trials. The IDE provides the manufacturer with a legal pathway to perform clinical trials on human subjects where without the IDE, only approved medical devices may be used on human subjects.

The IDE application must be supported by appropriate data, such as analytical, animal and laboratory testing results, manufacturing information, and an Investigational Review Board, or IRB approved protocol showing that it is safe to test the device in humans and that the testing protocol is scientifically sound. If the clinical trial design is deemed to have “non-significant risk,” the clinical trial may be eligible for “abbreviated” IDE requirements. In some instances, clinical trials for in vitro diagnostic medical devices may be exempt from the more burdensome IDE requirements if certain labeling requirements are met.

A clinical trial may be suspended by either the FDA or the Investigational Review Board at any time for various reasons, including a belief that the risks to the study participants outweigh the benefits of participation in the study. Even if a study is completed, clinical testing results may not demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the device, or they may be equivocal or otherwise insufficient to obtain approval of the product being tested. After the clinical trials have been completed, if at all, and the clinical trial data and results are collected and organized, a manufacturer may complete a PMA application.

After a PMA application is sufficiently complete, the FDA will accept the application and begin an in-depth review of the submitted information. By statute, the FDA has 180 days to review the “accepted application,” although, generally, review of the application can take between one and three years, but it may take significantly longer. During this review period, the FDA may request additional information or clarification of information already provided. Also, during the review period, an advisory panel of experts from outside the FDA may be convened to review and evaluate the application and provide recommendations to the FDA as to the approvability of the device. The preapproval inspections conducted by the FDA include an evaluation of the manufacturing facility to ensure compliance with the FDA’s quality systems regulations or QSR, as well as inspections of the clinical trial sites by the Bioresearch Monitoring group to evaluate compliance with good clinical practice and human subject protections. New PMA applications or PMA supplements are required for modifications that affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, including, for example, certain types of modifications to the device’s indication for use, manufacturing process, labeling and design. Significant changes to an approved PMA require a 180-day supplement, whereas less substantive changes may utilize a 30-day notice, or a 135-day supplement. Premarket approval supplements often require submission of the same type of information as a premarket approval application, except that the supplement is limited to information needed to support any changes from the device covered by the original premarket approval application, and it may not require as extensive clinical data or the convening of an advisory panel.

Our HIV 1/2 STAT-PAK Assay PMA application number BP050009/0 and our SURE CHECK 1/2 HIV Assay PMA application number BP050010/0 were approved by the FDA in May 2006. Our DPP HIV 1/2 Assay PMA application number BP120032/0 was approved by the FDA in December 2012.  Our DPP HIV Syphilis Assay PMA application number BP180191/0 was approved by the FDA in October 2020.

510(k) Clearance Pathway

We are currently developing products that either will or are likely to require an FDA 510(k) clearance. We anticipate submitting a 510(k) for each such product to demonstrate that such proposed device is substantially equivalent to a previously cleared 510(k) device or a device that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, for which the FDA has not yet called for the submission of a 510(k).  The FDA'sFDA’s 510(k) clearance pathway usually takes from three to twelve months but could take longer. In some cases the FDA may require additional information, including clinical data, to make a determination regarding substantial equivalence.

If a device receives 510(k) clearance, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a new or major change in its intended use, will require a new 510(k) clearance or, depending on the modification, a PMA. The FDA requires each device manufacturer to determine whether the proposed change requires submission of a new 510(k) or a PMA, but the FDA can review any such decision and, if it disagrees with the manufacturer'smanufacturer’s determination, can require the manufacturer to cease marketing and/or recall the modified device until 510(k) clearance or PMA of the modified device is obtained.
Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988

A manufacturer of a test categorized as moderately complex may request that categorization of the test be waived through a CLIA Waiver by Application, or CW, submission to the FDA. When a test is categorized as waived, it may be performed by laboratories with a Certificate of Waiver, such as a physician’s office outreach setting. In a CW submission, the manufacturer provides evidence to the FDA that a test meets the CLIA statutory criteria for waiver CLIA, a walk-in clinic or an emergency room provides CMS authority over all laboratory testing, except research that is performed on humans in the United States. The Division of Laboratory Services, within the Survey and Certification Group under the CMS, has the responsibility for implementing the CLIA program.

The CLIA program is designed to establish quality laboratory testing by ensuring the accuracy, reliability and timeliness of patient test results. Under CLIA, a laboratory is a facility that does laboratory testing on specimens derived from humans and used to provide information for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of disease, or impairment of, or assessment of health. Under the CLIA program, unless waived, laboratories must be certified by the government, satisfy governmental quality and personnel standards, undergo proficiency testing, be subject to inspections and pay fees. We have received a CLIA waiver for all of our lateral flowrapid diagnostic rapid HIV tests that we market in the United States. Specifically, the CLIA waiver was granted by the FDA for HIV 1/2 STAT-PAK in November 2006,for SURE CHECK HIV 1/2 in October 2007, and for DPP HIV 1/2 in October 2014.

Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA)

A formal request to issue an EUA generally should not be submitted until the Secretary of HHS has issued an EUA declaration under section 564(b)(1). In particular, although section 564 allows FDA to issue an EUA for preparedness purposes, in such cases the HHS Secretary must first declare that circumstances exist justifying such an authorization in advance of an actual emergency based on a formal determination of a significant potential for emergency or a material threat determination. During the effective period of the HHS Secretary’s EUA declaration, FDA may authorize the introduction of a medical product into interstate commerce when the product is intended for use during an actual or potential emergency. EUA candidate products include medical products and uses that are not approved, cleared, or licensed under sections 505, 510(k), and 515 of the FD&C Act or section 351 of the PHS Act.

After the requisite determination and declaration have been issued, and after feasible and appropriate consultations, FDA may issue an EUA only if FDA concludes that the following four statutory criteria for issuance have been met for 1) Serious or Life-Threatening Disease or conditions, 2) evidence of effectiveness, 2) Risk –Benefit Analysis, 4) No Alternatives.  A sponsor seeking an EUA can submit its formal request in the form of an EUA submission, which includes data for clinical studies, non-clinical laboratory studies to assess the safety and effectiveness of the product as well as the discussion of Risks and Benefits of the product.

FDA will specify the effective date of an EUA issued under section 564. In general, an EUA will remain in effect for the duration of the EUA declaration under which it was issued which describes termination of an EUA declaration and its impact on existing EUAs.

Pervasive and Continuing FDA Regulation

A host of regulatory requirements apply to our approved devices, including: the quality system regulation, which requires manufacturers to follow elaborate design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures; the Medical Reporting Regulations, which require manufacturers to report to the FDA specified types of adverse events involving their products; labeling regulations; and the FDA’s general prohibition against promoting products for unapproved or “off-label” uses. Some Class II devices are subject to special controls-such as performance standards, post-market surveillance, patient registries, and FDA guidelines-that do not apply to Class I devices.

The regulatory requirements that apply to our approved products classified as medical devices include:

product listing and establishment registration, which helps facilitate FDA inspections and other regulatory action;
QSR, which require manufacturers, including third-party manufacturers, to follow stringent design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during all aspects of the development and manufacturing process;
labeling regulations and FDA prohibitions against the promotion of products for uncleared, unapproved or off-label use or indication;
clearance of product modifications that could significantly affect safety or efficacy or that would constitute a major change in intended use of one of our cleared devices;
approval of product modifications that affect the safety or effectiveness of one of our cleared devices;
medical device reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers comply with FDA requirements to report if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or has malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction of the device or a similar device were to recur;
post-approval restrictions or conditions, including post-approval study commitments;
post-market surveillance regulations, which apply when necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and effectiveness data for the device;
the FDA’s recall authority, whereby it can ask, or under certain conditions order, device manufacturers to recall from the market a product that is in violation of governing laws and regulations;
regulations pertaining to voluntary recalls; and,
notices of corrections or removals.
product listing and establishment registration, which helps facilitate FDA inspections and other regulatory action;
QSR, which require manufacturers, including third-party manufacturers, to follow stringent design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during all aspects of the development and manufacturing process;

labeling regulations and FDA prohibitions against the promotion of products for uncleared, unapproved or off-label use or indication;
clearance of product modifications that could significantly affect safety or efficacy or that would constitute a major change in intended use of one of our cleared devices;
approval of product modifications that affect the safety or effectiveness of one of our cleared devices;
medical device reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers comply with FDA requirements to report if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or has malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction of the device or a similar device were to recur;
post-approval restrictions or conditions, including post-approval study commitments;
post-market surveillance regulations, which apply when necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and effectiveness data for the device;
the FDA’s recall authority, whereby it can ask, or under certain conditions order, device manufacturers to recall from the market a product that is in violation of governing laws and regulations;
regulations pertaining to voluntary recalls; and,
notices of corrections or removals.

Our Medford, New York facility is currently registered as an establishment with the FDA. We and any third-party manufacturers are subject to announced and unannounced inspections by the FDA to determine our compliance with QSR and other regulations.

21st Century Cures Act

The 21st Century Cures Act, enacted in December 2016, contains several sections specific to medical device innovations. We believe that implementation of the 21st Century Cures Act may have a positive impact on its businesses by facilitating innovation and/or reducing the regulatory burden imposed on medical device manufacturers.

Government Regulation of Medical Devices for Animal Subjects

We currently offer two veterinary devices in the United States: DPP VetTB Assay for Cervids and DPP VetTB Assay for Elephants. Diagnostic tests for animal health infectious diseases, including our veterinary devices for the prevention and/or treatment of animal disease, are regulated in the U.S. by the Center for Veterinary Biologics within the U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, or APHIS, under the Virus, Serum, and Toxin Act of 1913. As a requirement, our veterinary devices were approved by APHIS before they could be sold in the U.S.

The APHIS regulatory approval process involves the submission of product performance data and manufacturing documentation. Following regulatory approval to market a product, APHIS requires that each lot of product be submitted for review before release to customers. In addition, APHIS requires special approval to market products where test results are used in part for government-mandated disease management programs.

Environmental Laws

We believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with all foreign, federal, state, and local environmental regulations applicable to our manufacturing facilities. The cost of ongoing compliance with such regulations does not have a material effect on our operations.
Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property Strategy

Our intellectual property strategy is to:  (1) build our own intellectual property portfolio around our DPP technology and optical analyzers; (2) pursue licenses, trade secrets and know-how within the area of rapid point-of-care testing; and, (3) develop and acquire proprietary positions to certain reagents.

DPP Intellectual Property

We have obtained patent coverage on our DPP technology, including numerous patents in the United States, and one or more patents in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Columbia, Eurasia (Russia), European Union (fourteen European countries),Hong Kong, Israel, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Eurasia, Mexico, Poland, Singapore, Japan, Australia, Indonesia, KoreaSouth Africa, Thailand, and the U.K.United Kingdom .  Additional patent applications on our DPP technology are pending in the United States, as well as in  foreign countries such as Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, India, Israel,Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Singapore and South Africa.Thailand.

DPP technology provides us with freedom to operate whichand enables us to develop tests with better performance and capabilities compared with tests built on traditional lateral flow platforms.  These advantages have allowed us to enter into multiple technology collaborations based upon DPP technology, which we believe will provide new manufacturing and marketing opportunities. We have filed additional patent applications that we believe will strengthen the DPP intellectual property and have also filed for patent protection for certain other point-of-care technologies or applications thereof.

We have also obtained patent coverage on our optical-based analyzer technology in the United States with patents pendingas well as in several foreignEU countries.

Trademarks


We have filed and obtained trademarks for our company name CHEMBIO and CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC. as well as for many of our products, including DPP, SURE CHECK, STAT-VIEW, and STAT-PAK, and NEXT GENERATION DPP, as well as for the SampleTainer and DPP Micro Reader, which are used with certain DPP products.  Our trademarks have been obtainedregistered in the United States and certain other countries around the world.

Trade Secrets and Know-How

We have developed a substantial body of trade secrets and know-how relating to the development and manufacture of lateral flow and DPP-based diagnostic tests, including the sourcing and optimization of materials for such tests, and methods to maximize sensitivity, speed-to-result, specificity, stability and reproducibility of our tests.  We possess proprietary know-how to develop tests for multiple conditions using colored particles.  Our formulations enable long shelf lives of our rapid HIV and other tests, providing us with an important competitive advantage.

Lateral FlowRapid Diagnostic Technology and Reagent Licenses

We seek licenses and/or redesigns of products that we believe to be in our best interests.  Because of the costs and other negative consequences of time-consuming patent litigation, we often attempt to obtain a license on reasonable terms.

The peptides used in our rapid HIV tests were licensed to us by one or more third parties. We also have licensed the antigens used in other tests including our Syphilis, Tuberculosis, Leptospirosis, Leishmaniasis and Chagas tests, and we may enter into other license agreements.  In prior years, we concluded license agreements related to intellectual property rights owned by the United States associated with HIV-1 and a sub-license agreement for HIV-2 with Bio-Rad Laboratories N.A., the exclusive licensee of the Pasteur Institute’s HIV-2 intellectual property estate.
Available Information

We are required to file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and amendments to those documents filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are also available free of charge on our website at www.chembio.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

Investors should note that we currently announce material information to our investors and others using filings with the SEC, press releases, public conference calls, webcasts or our website (www.chembio.com), including news and announcements regarding our financial performance, key personnel, our brands and our business strategy. Information that we post on our corporate website could be deemed material to investors. We encourage investors to review the information we post on these channels. We may from time to time update the list of channels we will use to communicate information that could be deemed material and will post information about any such change on www.chembio.com. The information on our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part hereof or incorporated into this or any of our other filings with the SEC.

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 555 Wireless Boulevard, Hauppauge, New York 11788. Our telephone number is (631) 924-1135. Our website address is www.chembio.com. The information contained in, or accessible through, our corporate website does not constitute part of this report.

ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider each of the following risk factors and all of the other information provided in this Form 10-K10 K in considering whether to make or continue to hold an investment in our Common Stock. The risks described below are those we currently believe may materially affect us. An investment in our Company involves a high degree of risk, and should be considered only by persons who can afford the loss of their entire investment. Although we believe that these risks are the most important for you to consider, you should read this section in conjunction with our financial statements, the notes to those financial statements and our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in our periodic reports and incorporated into this Form 10-K10 K by reference.

RISK FACTORS SUMMARY

Our business is subject to a number of risks, including risks that may prevent us from achieving our business objectives or may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects. The risks are discussed more fully below and include, but are not limited to, the risks summarized below.

Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry
the refocus of our business strategy to respond to COVID‑19, including the successful development and market acceptance of the DPP SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG System, the DPP SARS CoV 2 Antigen System and the DPP Respiratory Antigen Panel, which we refer to as the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems;
our allocation of substantially all of our resources to the development and production of COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems;
the effects of existing or future shareholder litigation;
our competitors developing more effective or successful products;
the ability of our products to compete with the new or existing products of our competitors;
the negative impact of healthcare industry consolidation on our future revenues and operating results;
our ability to retain key employees and attract additional qualified personnel;
third‑party reimbursement policies; and
the vulnerability of our business to cyber‑attacks.

Risks Related to Our Products
the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems not gaining wide industry acceptance;
the impact of COVID‑19 mutations on the ability of the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems adequately detecting COVID‑19 or SARS‑CoV‑2 antigens;
our ability to successfully introduce and market our products, particularly the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems;
timely receipt and implementation of additional customized manufacturing automation equipment;
variability and unpredictability due to lengthy sales cycles for our products;
our customers not adopting rapid point‑of‑care diagnostic testing;
the concentration of our customers; and
our products not performing properly.

Financial, Economic and Financing Risks
our incurrence of losses in recent years and uncertainty about our future profitability;
the fluctuation of our financial results;
our compliance with the terms of our Credit Agreement and Guaranty;
our ability to generate sufficient cash to service our debt;
increased interest expenses due to changes in LIBOR;
the negative impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our operating results; and
basing our estimates or judgments relate to critical accounting policies on assumptions that can change or prove to be   incorrect.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property
our ability to protect our proprietary technology; and
the effect of future intellectual property disputes on our ability to sell products or use certain technologies.

14

Risks Related to Our Third Party Collaborators
our dependence on a limited number of third‑party suppliers, including single source suppliers, for critical components and materials;
the limitation on rights we receive from collaborations with strategic collaborators, and the exposure to risks outside of our control due to such collaborations;
our ability to maintain existing distribution channels or develop new distribution channels; and
our compliance with U.S. government contracts.

Risks Related to Regulations
the impact of changes in CLIA, FDA, ANVISA, and other regulatory changes, on COVID‑19 diagnostic tests;
our ability to receive and maintain necessary regulatory approvals for our products, particularly the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems;
the impact of governmental export controls on our ability to compete in international markets;
our ability to comply with FDA and other regulatory requirements, particularly with respect to the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems;
our ability to respond to changes in regulatory requirements;
the effect of FDA regulation of laboratory‑developed tests and genetic testing on demand for our products;
disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies affecting the ability of the FDA to hire, retain or deploy key leadership or personal or otherwise could prevent new and modified products from being developed, cleared, approved, authorized or commercialized;
ongoing changes in healthcare regulation;
a reduction or elimination in the types of government awards that partially support some of our programs;
compliance with privacy, security and breach notification regulations;
our ability to manufacture products in accordance with applicable requirements;
the effect of healthcare fraud and abuse laws on our business; and
increased exposure to regulatory, cultural and other challenges due to international expansion.

Risks Related to Ownership of Common Stock
the limited liquidity of our Common Stock;
the volatility of the price of our Common Stock;
the effect of future issuances of Common Stock on the price of our Common Stock and our ability to raise funds in new equity offerings;
the control management and larger stockholders exercise over us; and
the depression of the market price of our common stock due to sale by existing stockholders, executive officers or directors.

General Risk Factors
our ability to successfully generate the expected benefits of our acquisitions; and
developments related to the U.K.’s referendum on membership in the E.U.; and
legislative and regulatory changes.

RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry

We have refocused our business strategy to respond to COVID‑19, which is a new and rapidly developing market, making it difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects.

The market for COVID‑19 diagnostic testing is new and rapidly developing, which makes it difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects. We have encountered, and will continue to encounter, risks and difficulties frequently experienced in rapidly changing industries, including those related to:
our ability to compete with companies that are currently in, or may in the future enter, the market for our products;
our ability to control costs, including our operating expenses;
our ability to successfully expand our business;
our ability to meet customer demand;
the amount and timing of operating expenses, particularly sales and manufacturing expenses, related to the maintenance and   expansion of our business, operations and infrastructure; and
general economic and political conditions in our markets.

Given the unpredictable nature of the COVID‑19 pandemic, the potential size of this market and the timing of its development remains highly uncertain. Our future success is dependent on the manner in which the market for COVID‑19 diagnostics develops. If the market develops in a manner that does not facilitate the inclusion of our products, or fails to grow in the manner in which we expect, our business may not continue to grow.

15

We are allocating substantially all of our resources to the development and production of COVID‑19 Test Systems for the foreseeable future, and our long‑term business success could be negatively impacted by our diversion of resources from our legacy business of diagnostic testing for other infectious diseases.

We are committing substantially all of our financial and personnel resources to the development, manufacturing and commercialization of COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems. This resource allocation may negatively impact our legacy product portfolio, as we expect to spend limited funds and time on updating pre‑existing products and regulatory approvals or on completing products that were in development prior to our strategic decision to focus on COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems. Our business could be negatively impacted by our allocation of significant resources to a global health threat that is unpredictable and could dissipate; there is no guarantee that current or anticipated demand will continue, or if demand does continue, that we will be able to produce in quantities to meet the demand. We intend to reestablish our legacy business in the future, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully recommence the development and commercialization of our legacy products and products under development.

Our near‑term success is highly dependent on the success of the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems, and we cannot be certain that we will succeed in developing one or more of those systems or that, if we do, they will attain market acceptance or be successfully commercialized in the United States or elsewhere.

 
We do not currently have an Emergency Use Authorization, or EUA, from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for any of the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems, and we do not currently have an application pending for any such EUA. Moreover, market and regulatory requirements continue to change at a rapid pace. The FDA has declined to review certain of our COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems based on then-effective prioritization guidance, which is subject to change. There can be no assurance that, if we are to make a submission of any future EUA application, we will meet the requirements of the prioritization guidance in effect at the time of the submission or otherwise be successful in obtaining an EUA that would permit us to offer and sell any COVID-19 Diagnostic Test System in the United States.

Even if we are able to obtain an EUA for any of the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems, including our revised DPP SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG System and DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen System that product may not gain broad market acceptance among physicians, healthcare payers, patients, and the medical community. We have conducted our own research into the markets for our product candidates, including the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems; however, we cannot guarantee market acceptance of our product, and have somewhat limited information on which to estimate our anticipated level of sales. Our products will require healthcare providers and doctors to accept and adopt our technology. Our industry is susceptible to rapid technological developments and there can be no assurance that we will be able to match any new technological advances. If we are unable to match the technological changes in the needs of our customers the demand for our products will be reduced. Acceptance and use of any products we market will depend upon a number of factors including:

perceptions by members of the health care community, including physicians, about the safety and effectiveness of our products;
limitation on use or warnings required by FDA in our product labeling;
cost‑effectiveness of our products relative to competing products;
convenience and ease of administration;
potential advantages of alternative treatment methods;
availability of reimbursement for our products from government or other healthcare payers; and
effectiveness of marketing and distribution efforts by us and our licensees and distributors, if any.

Because we expect virtually all of our product revenues for the foreseeable future to be generated from sales of our current products and COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems in particular, the failure of these products to find market acceptance would substantially harm our business and would adversely affect our revenue. If the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems are not as successfully commercialized as expected, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to become profitable. Any failure of either of the COVID‑19 Diagnostic Test Systems to be successfully commercialized in the United States may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating result financial condition and cash flows, and could result in a substantial decline in the price of our common stock.

The diagnostic testing market, particularly with respect to COVID‑19, is highly competitive, and many of our competitors are larger, better established and have greater technical and marketing capabilities and financial and other resources than we have.

16

The diagnostics market, particularly with respect to COVID‑19 diagnostic tests, is highly competitive and we face substantial competition based on factors such as product quality, analytical performance, ease of use, price, customer service and reputation. Industry competition is also based the following additional factors:

patent protection;
scientific expertise;
ability to develop and market products and processes;
ability to obtain required regulatory approvals;
ability to manufacture cost‑effective products that meet applicable regulatory requirements;
access to adequate capital; and
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel.

Numerous companies in the United States and internationally have announced their intention to offer new products, services and technologies that could be used in substitution for the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems. Many of those competitors are significantly larger, and have substantially greater financial, engineering and other resources, than us. In addition, our competitors may have or may develop products or technologies that currently or in the future will enable them to produce competitive products with greater capabilities or at lower costs than ours. If we are unable to compete effectively, we may fail to meet our strategic objectives, and our business, financial condition and operating results could be harmed. In addition, the production of an efficacious vaccine or other treatment for COVID‑19 may reduce the demand for diagnostic products. The success or failure, or perceived success or failure, of other companies may adversely impact our ability to obtain any future funding, or to ultimately commercialize the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems.

Shareholder litigation could negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may incur additional costs in connection with the defense or settlement of existing and any future shareholder litigation, including four shareholder lawsuits to date that have been brought against us. See Part I, Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” below for additional information regarding these lawsuits. These lawsuits or other future litigation may adversely affect the ability of our technical and management personnel, and our directors, to perform their normal responsibilities. We could incur significant costs in connection with any such litigation lawsuits, including costs associated with the indemnification of obligations to our directors.

We expect competition to with respect to testing solutions for COVID‑19 to continue to increase and our success will depend on widespread market acceptance of our products.

We expect competition to continue to increase as other established and emerging companies enter the market, as customer requirements evolve, and as new products, services and technologies are introduced. The entrance of new competitors is being encouraged by governmental authorities, which are offering funding to support development of testing solutions for COVID‑19. Some of our existing or new competitors may have strong relationships with current and potential customers, including governmental authorities, and, as a result, may be able to respond more quickly to new or changing regulatory requirements, new or emerging technologies, and changes in customer requirements. Our products may not compete favorably, and we may not be successful in the face of increasing competition from new products and technologies introduced by our existing competitors or new companies entering our markets. Any failure to compete effectively could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

The COVID‑19 pandemic could affect our suppliers and employees, and cause disruptions in current and future plans for operations and expansion.

The COVID‑19 pandemic may directly and indirectly adversely impact our business, financial condition and operating results. The extent to which this will continue will depend on numerous evolving factors that are highly uncertain, rapidly changing and cannot be predicted with precision or certainty at this time.

Our business may be disrupted due to the costs incurred as a result of additional necessary actions and preparedness plans to help ensure the health and safety of our employees and continued operations, including enhanced cleaning processes, protocols designed to implement appropriate social distancing practices, and/or adoption of additional wage and benefit programs to assist employees. We may also have difficulty meeting demand for our products if our employees are affected by COVID‑19, or if we do not have adequate space to produce our product with social distancing practices implemented. We also cannot predict the effect of COVID‑19 pandemic on our supply chain’s reliability and costs,

In addition, our business and operations, and the operations of our suppliers, may be adversely affected by the COVID‑19 pandemic. The pandemic, including the related response, could cause disruptions due to potential suspension or slowdown of activities at our third‑party suppliers, or increased prices implemented by our suppliers. The adverse effect on our employees or suppliers could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

17

We operate in a fragmented, segmented, and rapidly changing industry, which is highly competitive with respect to numerous factors, and our success depends on our ability compete effectively with larger companies, develop new or enhance existing products, as well as acceptance of DPP over more traditional diagnostic platform technologies.

Important competitive factors for our products include price, quality, performance, ease of use, and customer service. A few large corporations produce a wide variety of diagnostic tests and other medical devices and equipment. A larger number of mid-sizemid‑size companies generally compete only in the diagnostic industry and a significant number of small companies produce only a few diagnostic products. As a result, the diagnostic test industry is highly fragmented and segmented.
16


More generally, the point-of-carepoint‑of‑care diagnostics industry is undergoing rapid technological changes, with frequent introductions of new technology-driventechnology‑driven products and services. As new technologies become introduced into the point-of-carepoint‑of‑care diagnostic testing market, we may be required to commit considerable additional efforts, time and resources to enhance our current product portfolio or develop new products. We may not have the available time and resources to accomplish this, and many of our competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driventechnology‑driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers, which would materially harm our operating results.

Although we own DPP patents, lateral flow technology is still a competitive platform to DPP, and lateral flow technology has a lower cost of manufacture than DPP products. Although the DPP platform has shown improved sensitivity as compared with conventional lateral flow platforms in a number of studies, several factors go into the development and performance attributes of products. Therefore the ability of our products to successfully compete will depend on several other factors, including our having a patented rapid test platform technology that differentiates DPP from lateral flow as well as from other diagnostic platform technologies.

There can be no assurance that our DPP patents or our products incorporating those patents will not be challenged at some time in the future.

Our Competitorscompetitors may Developdevelop and Commercialize More Effectivecommercialize more effective or Successful Products,successful products, and Our Research, Developmentour research, development and Commercialization Effortscommercialization efforts may not Succeed.succeed.

We regularly commit substantial resources to research and development and the commercialization of our new or enhanced products. The research and development process usually takes a long time from inception to commercial launch. During each stage of this process there is a substantial risk that we will not achieve our goals in a timely fashion, or at all, and we may have to abandon a new or enhanced product in which we have invested substantial time and money. We expect to continue to incur significant costs related to our research and development activities.

Our products require significant development and investment prior to commercialization, including testing to demonstrate the products’ performance capabilities, cost-effectivenesscost‑effectiveness or other benefits. We must obtain regulatory approval before most products may be sold and additional development efforts on these products may be required before the products will be reviewed. However, regulatory authorities may not approve these products for commercial sale or may substantially delay or condition such approval. There may be little or no market for the product and entry into or development of new markets for our products may require an investment of substantial resources even if all applicable regulatory approvals are obtained. Furthermore, we may spend a significant amount of money on advertising or other activities and still fail to develop a market for the product. The success of our efforts may be affected by our ability to manufacture products in a cost-effectivecost‑effective manner, whether we can obtain necessary intellectual property rights and protection and our ability to obtain reimbursement authorizations in the markets where the product will be sold. Therefore, if we fail to develop and gain commercial acceptance for our products, or if competitors develop more effective products or a greater number of successful new products, customers may decide not to purchase our products.

Our Productsproducts may not be Ableable to Competecompete with New Diagnostic Productsnew diagnostic products or Existing Products Developedexisting products developed by Well-Established Competitors,well‑established competitors, which would Negatively Affect Our Business.negatively affect our business.

The diagnostic industry is focused on the testing of biological specimens in a laboratory or at the point-of-carepoint‑of‑care and is highly competitive and rapidly changing. Important competitive factors for our products include price, quality, performance, ease of use, and customer service.

A few large corporations produce a wide variety of diagnostic tests and other medical devices and equipment. A larger number of mid-sizemid‑size companies generally compete only in the diagnostic industry and a significant number of small companies produce only a few diagnostic products. As a result, the diagnostic test industry is highly fragmented and segmented.

17
18

Some of our principal competitors may have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. Several companies produce diagnostic tests that compete directly with our testing product line, including Abbott (Alere), OraSure Technologies and Trinity Biotech. Some competitors offer broader product lines and may have greater name recognition than we have. These and other companies have or may have products incorporating molecular or other advanced technologies that over time could directly compete with our testing product line. We also face competition from certain of our distributors or former customers that have created or may decide to create, their own products to compete with ours.

As new products incorporating new technologies enter the market, our products may become obsolete or a competitor’s products may be more effective or more effectively marketed and sold. If our competitors’ products take market share from our products through more effective marketing or competitive pricing, our revenues, margins and operating results could be adversely affected. In addition, our revenues and operating results could be negatively impacted if some of our customers internally develop or acquire their own sample collection devices and use those devices in place of our products in order to reduce costs.

Our Future Revenuesfuture revenues and Operating Resultsoperating results may be Negatively Affectednegatively affected by Ongoing Consolidationongoing consolidation in the Healthcare Industry.healthcare industry.

There has been a significant amount of consolidation in the healthcare industry. This consolidation has increased the competition to provide goods and services to customers. In addition, group purchasing organizations and integrated health delivery networks have served to concentrate purchasing decisions for some customers, which has also placed pricing pressure on medical device suppliers. Due to ongoing consolidation, there could be additional pressure on the prices of our products.
The Company may not successfully manage the transition associated with the appointment of a new chief executive officer, which could have an adverse impact on the Company.
On January 9, 2020, we announced that John J. Sperzel III had notified the board of directors of his resignation as our Chief Executive Officer and President and one of our directors. On the same day, we announced that we had appointed Gail S. Page, one of our directors, to serve as our Interim Chief Executive Officer. On March 12, 2020, we announced that we had appointed Richard Eberly as our Chief Executive Officer, effective as of March 16, 2020.
The effectiveness of our new Chief Executive Officer, and our senior leadership team generally, following these transitions and any further transition as a result of these changes, could have a significant impact on our results of operations. Management transition is often difficult and inherently causes some loss of institutional knowledge, which could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition. Our ability to execute our business strategies may be adversely affected by the uncertainty associated with these transitions.

Our Continued Growth Dependscontinued growth depends on Retaining Our Current Key Employeesretaining our current key employees and Attracting Additional Qualified Personnel,attracting additional qualified personnel, and Wewe may not be Ableable to do so.

Our success depends to a large extent upon the skills and experience of our executive officers, sales, marketing, operations and scientific staff. We may not be able to attract or retain qualified employees due to the intense competition for qualified personnel among medical products businesses and academic and other research institutions, as well as to geographic considerations, our ability to offer competitive compensation and benefits, and other reasons.

If we are not able to attract and retain the necessary qualified personnel to accomplish our business objectives, we may experience constraints that will adversely affect our ability to effectively manufacture, sell and market our products to meet the demands of our customers and strategic partners in a timely fashion, or to support internal research and development programs.
18


We have entered into employment contracts with our Interim Chief Executive Officer, Gail S. Page; our incoming Chief Executive Officer, Richard Eberly, our Chief Science & Technology Officer, Javan Esfandiari, and our Chief Financial Officer, Neil Goldman. Due to the specific knowledge and experience of these executives regarding the industry, technology and market generally and to our company specifically, the loss of the services of any one of these executives could have a material adverse effect on us. We have not obtained a key man insurance policy on any officer other than Mr. Esfandiari.

We may not generate the expected benefits of our acquisitions of opTricon GmbH or Orangelife Comercio e Industria Ltda. and the ongoing integration of the acquisitions could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and increase our expenses.

We acquired opTricon GmbH, or opTricon, and Orangelife Comercio e Industria Ltda., or Orangelife, in November 2018 and November 2019, respectively, with the expectation that the acquisition will result in various benefits, including securing global commercial rights and reducing cost of goods. Achieving the anticipated benefits of either acquisition is subject to a number of uncertainties, including whether our business and the businesses of opTricon or Orangelife can be integrated in an efficient and effective manner. We cannot assure you that we will be able to accurately forecast the performance or ultimate impact of either the opTricon acquisition or the Orangelife acquisition.

The integration processes may take longer than anticipated and result in the loss of valuable employees, the incurrence of additional and unforeseen expenses, the disruption of our ongoing business, processes and systems, or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, practices, policies and compensation arrangements, any of which could adversely affect our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions. There may be increased risk due to integrating financial reporting and internal control systems. The integration processes are subject to a number of uncertainties, and no assurance can be given that the anticipated benefits, expense savings and synergies will be realized or, if realized, the timing of their realization. Failure to achieve these anticipated benefits could result in increased costs or decreases in the amount of expected revenues and could adversely affect our future business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.

We have incurred and will continue to incur non-recurringnon‑recurring expenses in connection with the opTricon acquisition and the Orangelife acquisition, including legal, accounting and other expenses. Additional unanticipated costs may be incurred following consummation of the opTricon acquisition or the Orangelife acquisition in the course of the integration of the respective businesses into our business. We cannot be certain that the realization of efficiencies related to the integration of the two businesses will offset the transaction and integration costs in the near term, or at all, or any losses from undiscovered liabilities not covered by an indemnification from the sellers of opTricon or Orangelife.
We may not Generate the Expected Benefits of Future Acquisitions or Investments, and they could Disrupt Our Ongoing Business, Distract Our Management, Increase Our Expenses and Negatively Affect Our Business.
As a way for us to grow our business, we may pursue strategic acquisitions or investments. These activities, and their impact on our business, are subject to many risks, including the following: (i) the benefits expected to be derived from an acquisition or investment may not materialize and could be affected by numerous factors, such as regulatory developments, insurance reimbursement, our inexperience with new businesses or markets, general economic conditions and increased competition; (ii) we may be unable to successfully integrate an acquired company’s personnel, assets, management, information technology systems, accounting policies and practices, products and/or technology into our business; (iii) we may not be able to accurately forecast the performance or ultimate impact of an acquired business; and (iv) an acquisition may result in the incurrence of unexpected expenses, stockholder lawsuits, the dilution of our earnings or our existing stockholders’ percentage ownership, or potential losses from undiscovered liabilities not covered by an indemnification from the seller(s) of the acquired business.

19

If these factors occur, we may be unable to achieve all or a significant part of the benefits expected from an acquisition or investment. This may adverselyThird‑party reimbursement policies and potential cost constraints could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations and ability to grow our business or otherwise achieve our financial and strategic objectives.

business.
Third-Party Reimbursement Policies and Potential Cost Constraints could Negatively Affect Our Business.

The listpotential end‑users of our product end-users includesproducts include hospitals, physicians and other healthcare providers. If these end-usersend‑users do not receive adequate reimbursement for the cost of our products from their patients’ healthcare insurers or payors, the use of our products could be negatively impacted. Furthermore, the net sales of our products could also be adversely affected by changes in reimbursement policies of government or private healthcare payors.

Hospitals, physicians and other healthcare providers who purchase diagnostic products in the United States generally rely on third-partythird‑party payors, such as private health insurance plans, Medicare and Medicaid, to reimburse all or part of the cost of the product. Due to the overall escalating cost of medical products and services, especially in light of the COVID‑19 outbreak and its straining of healthcare systems across the globe, there is increased pressurespressure on the healthcare industry, both foreign and domestic, to reduce the cost of products and services. Given the efforts to control and reduce healthcare costs in the United States, available levels of reimbursement may change for our existing products or products under development. Third-partyThird‑party reimbursement and coverage may not be available or adequate in either the United States or international markets, current reimbursement amounts may be decreased in the future and future legislation, and regulation or reimbursement policies of third-partythird‑party payors, may reduce the demand for our products or our ability to sell our products on a profitable basis.

To the Extentextent that Wewe are Unableunable to Collect Our Outstanding Accounts Receivable, Our Operating Resultscollect our outstanding accounts receivable, our operating results could be Materially Harmed.materially harmed.

There may be circumstances and timing that require us to accept payment terms, including delayed payment terms, from distributors or customers, which, if not satisfied, could cause financial losses.

We generally accept payment terms which require us to ship product before the contract price has been paid fully, and there also are circumstances pursuant to which we may accept further delayed payment terms pursuant to which we may continue to deliver product. To the extent that these circumstances result in significant accounts receivables and those accounts receivables are not paid on a timely basis, or are not paid at all, especially if concentrated in one or two customers, we could suffer financial losses.

Ongoing ChangesWe believe our success depends in Healthcare Regulation could Negatively Affect Our Revenues, Business and Financial Condition.
There have been several proposed changes inpart on the United States at the federal and state level for comprehensive reforms regarding the payment for, the availabilitycontinued funding of, and reimbursement for healthcare services. These proposals have ranged from fundamentally changing federal and state healthcare reimbursementour ability to participate in, large testing programs including providing comprehensive healthcare coverage to the public under government-funded programs, to minor modifications to existing programs. One example is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care or the Affordable Care Act, the Federal healthcare reform law enacted in 2010.
Healthcare reform initiatives will continue to be proposed, and may reduce healthcare related funding in an effort. It is impossible to predict the ultimate content and timing of any healthcare reform legislation and its resulting impact on us. If significant reforms are made to the healthcare system in the United States, or in other jurisdictions, those reforms may increase our costs or otherwise negatively effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
20

In April 2017, the European Parliament passed the Medical Devices Regulation (Regulation 2017/745), which repeals and replaces the European Union Medical Devices Directive and the Active Implantable Medical Devices Directive. Unlike directives, which must be implemented into the national laws of the European Economic Area, which we refer to as the EEA, member States, the regulations would be directly applicable, i.e., without the need for adoption of EEA member State laws implementing them, in all EEA member States and are intended to eliminate current differences in the regulation of medical devices among EEA member States. The Medical Devices Regulation, among other things, is intended to establish a uniform, transparent, predictable and sustainable regulatory framework across the EEA for medical devices and ensure a high level of safety and health while supporting innovation. The Medical Devices Regulation will, however, only become fully applicable three years after publication (in May 2020). Once applicable, the Medical Devices Regulation will, among other things:
strengthen the rules on placing devices on the market and reinforce surveillance once they are available;
establish explicit provisions on manufacturers’ responsibilities for the follow-up of the quality, performance and safety of devices placed on the market;
improve the traceability of medical devices throughout the supply chain to the end-user or patient through a unique identification number;
set up a central database to provide patients, healthcare professionals and the public with comprehensive information on products available in the EU; and
strengthen rules for the assessment of certain high-risk devices, such as implants, which may have to undergo an additional check by experts before they are placed on the market.
Once applicable, the Medical Devices Regulation may impose increased compliance obligations for us to access the EU market.
We Believe Our Success Depends in Part on the Continued Funding of, and Our Ability to Participate in, Large Testing Programs in the U.S. and Worldwide,And worldwide, the Fundingfunding of which may be Reducedreduced or Discontinueddiscontinued or Otherwiseotherwise be Unavailableunavailable to Us.us.

We believe it to be in our best interests to meaningfully participate in large testing programs. Moreover many of these programs are funded by governments and other donors, and there can be no assurance that funding will not be reduced or completely discontinued. Participation in these programs also requires alignment and engagement with the many other participants in these programs, including WHO, CDC, the U.S. Agency for International Development, foreign governments and their agencies, non-governmentalnon‑governmental organizations, and HIV service organizations. If we are unsuccessful in our efforts to participate in these programs, our operating results could be materially harmed.

In December 2013 President Obama signed into law the PEPFAR Stewardship and Oversight Act, which is the most recent reauthorization of PEPFAR. However, unlike the 2008 PEPFAR authorization, which authorized approximately $45 billion in funding, the new law did not authorize a specific dollar amount for funding.

Developing Testing Guidelinestesting guidelines could Negatively Affect Salesnegatively affect sales of Our Products.our products.

Government agencies may issue diagnostic testing guidelines or recommendations, which can alter the usage of our HIV testing products. New laws or guidelines, or changes to existing laws or guidelines, and the manner in which these new or changed laws and guidelines are interpreted and applied, could impact the degree to which our testing products are used. These developments could affect the frequency of testing, the number of people tested and whether the testing products are used broadly for screening large populations or in a more limited capacity. These factors could in turn affect the level of sales of our products and our results of operations.

Some of our programs are partially supported by government grant awards, which may not be available to us in the future.

We have received funding under grant award programs funded by governmental agencies such as NIDA and BARDA. To fund a portion of our future research and development programs, we may apply for additional grant funding from these or similar governmental agencies. However, funding by these governmental agencies may be significantly reduced or eliminated in the future for a number of reasons. For example, some programs are subject to a yearly appropriations process in Congress. In addition, we may not receive full funding under current or future grants because of budgeting constraints of the agency administering the program or unsatisfactory progress on the study being funded. Therefore, we cannot assure you that we will receive any future grant funding from any government agencies, or, that if received, we will receive the full amount of the particular grant award. Any such reductions could delay the development of our product candidates and the introduction of new products.

21
20

Legislative and Other Regulatory Changes could have an Effect on Our Business.
The current U.S. Presidential Administration has promised to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, expressed concerns with respect to existing trade agreements, and has indicated a desire to make other regulatory changes during his administration. Changes in regulatory or economic conditions or in the laws and policies governing foreign trade, taxes, manufacturing, and development in the United States could impact our business. Economic and regulatory changes could also affect foreign currency exchange rates which, in turn, could affect our reported financial results and our competitiveness on a worldwide basis.
Developments Related to the U.K.’s Referendum On Membership in the E.U. Could Adversely Affect Us.
On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom voted in favor of leaving the European Union, or E.U.. On January 24, 2020, the U.K. and the E.U. entered into a withdrawal agreement pursuant to which the U.K. formally left the E.U. on January 31, 2020, but will, for a transition period ending on December 31, 2020, maintain access to the E.U. single market and to the global trade deals negotiated by the E.U. on behalf of its members and remain subject to E.U. law. The ultimate impact of the “leave” vote will depend on the terms that are negotiated in relation to the U.K.’s future relationship with the E.U. “Brexit” could impair our ability to transact business in the U.K. and E.U. countries. Brexit has already and could continue to contribute to instability in the global financial markets. The long-term effects of Brexit will depend in part on any new trade agreements the U.K. makes to retain access to E.U. markets following the U.K.’s withdrawal transition period from the E.U. Negotiations of a trade agreement may be unsuccessful, and the U.K. may not reach agreement with the E.U. on the future terms of the U.K.’s relationship with the E.U.
Without an agreement, there will be a period of considerable uncertainty particularly in relation to the financial and banking markets and the regulation of our industry, including the regulatory approval process.
We expect that Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the U.K. determines which E.U. laws to replicate or replace. If the U.K. were to significantly alter its regulations affecting the pharmaceutical industry, we could face significant new costs relating to the development, manufacture, and marketing of our current and future products. It may also be time-consuming and expensive for us to alter our internal operations in order to comply with any new regulations.
Among other outcomes, Brexit could disrupt the free movement of goods, services and people between the U.K. and the E.U., and result in increased legal and regulatory complexities, as well as potential higher costs of conducting business in the U.K. and the E.U. In addition, changes to U.K. immigration policy as a result of Brexit could adversely affect our ability to retain talent for our European operations. Given the lack of comparable precedent, it is unclear what financial, trade, regulatory, and legal implications the final withdrawal of the U.K. from the E.U. would have and how such withdrawal would affect us. Any of these effects, and others we cannot anticipate, could negatively affect our business and financial condition.
We could be Exposedexposed to Liabilityliability if We Experience Security Breacheswe experience security breaches or Other Disruptions,other disruptions, which could Harm Our Reputationharm our reputation and Businessbusiness.

We may be subject to cyber-attackscyber‑attacks whereby computer hackers may attempt to access our computer systems or our third party IT service provider’s systems and, if successful, misappropriate personal or confidential information.information, particularly if we gain recognition in our industry. In addition, a contractor or other third party with whom we do business may attempt to circumvent our security measures or obtain such information, and may purposefully or inadvertently cause a breach involving sensitive information. We will continue to evaluate and implement additional protective measures to reduce the risk and detect cyber incidents, but cyber-attackscyber‑attacks are becoming more sophisticated and frequent and the techniques used in such attacks change rapidly. Even though we take cyber-securitycyber‑security measures that are continuously reviewed and updated, our information technology networks and infrastructure may still be vulnerable due to sophisticated attacks by hackers or breaches.
Even the most well protected IT networks, systems, and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in security breaches are continually evolving and generally are not recognized until launched against a target and, in fact, may not be detected. Any such compromise of our or our third party’s IT service providers’ data security and access, public disclosure, or loss of personal or confidential business information, could result in legal claims proceedings, liability under laws to protect, privacy of personal information, and regulatory penalties, disrupt our operations, require significant management attention and resources to remedy any damages that result, damage our reputation and customers willingness to transact business with us, any of which could adversely affect our business.

Our Abilityability to Efficiently Operate Our Businessefficiently operate our business is Reliantreliant on Information Technology,information technology, and Any Material Failure, Inadequacy, Interruptionany material failure, inadequacy, interruption or Security Breachsecurity breach of that Technologytechnology could Harm Our Business.harm our business.

We rely heavily on complex information technology systems across our operations and on the internet, including for management of inventory, invoices, purchase orders, shipping, interactions with our third-partythird‑party logistics provider, revenue and expense accounting, consumer call support, online business, and various other processes and transactions. Our ability to effectively manage our business, coordinate the production, distribution and sale of our products, respond to customer inquiries, and ensure the timely and accurate recording and disclosure of financial information depends significantly on the reliability and capacity of these systems and the internet.

If any of the foregoing systems fails to operate effectively, problems with transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems, or disruptions in the operation of the internet, could cause delays in product sales and reduced efficiency of our operations. Significant expenditures could be required to fix any such problem.

If there is an Increaseincrease in Demanddemand for Our Products,our products, it could Require Usrequire us to Expend Considerable Resourcesexpend considerable resources or Harm Our Customer Relationshipsharm our customer relationships if Wewe are Unableunable to Meetmeet that Demand.demand.

If there are significant or unexpected increases in the demand for our products, we may not be able to meet that demand without expending additional capital resources. This would increase our capital costs, which could negatively affect our earnings in the short term. In addition, new manufacturing equipment or facilities may require FDA, WHO, and other regulatory approvals before they can be used to manufacture our products. To the extent we are unable to obtain or are delayed in obtaining such approvals, our ability to meet the demand for our products could be adversely affected. Furthermore, our suppliers may be unable or unwilling to expend the necessary capital resources or otherwise expand their capacity, which could negatively affect our business.

Our business could be negatively affected if we or our suppliers are unable to develop necessary manufacturing capabilities in a timely manner. If we fail to increase production volumes in a cost effective manner or if we experience lower than anticipated yields or production problems as a result of changes that we or our suppliers make in our manufacturing processes to meet increased demand, we could experience shipment delays or interruptions and increased manufacturing costs, which could also have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.

If there are unexpected increases in demand for our products, we may be required to obtain additional raw materials in order to manufacture products to meet the increase in demand. However, some raw materials require significant ordering lead time and some are currently obtained from a sole supplier or a limited group of suppliers. It is also possible that one or more of our suppliers may become unwilling or unable to deliver materials to us. Any shortfall in our supply of raw materials and components, or our inability to quickly and cost-effectivelycost‑effectively obtain alternative sources for this supply, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet increased demand for our products. This could negatively affect our total revenues or cost of sales and related profits.

If we are unable to meet customer demand for our products, it could also harm our relationships with our customers and impair our reputation within the industry. This, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business.


Our management and larger stockholders exercise significant control over us.

As of December 31, 2020, 2% of our outstanding common stock was beneficially owned by our executive officers, directors and 5% stockholders including three large investors that beneficially own 18%, of our outstanding common stock. For the foreseeable future, and assuming these ownership percentages continue to apply, to the extent that these parties vote similarly, they may be able to exercise significant control over many matters requiring approval by the board of directors or our stockholders. As a result, they may be able to:

control the composition of our board of directors;
control our management and policies;
determine the outcome of significant corporate transactions, including changes in control that may be beneficial to stockholders; and,
act in each of their own interests, which may conflict with or differ from the interests of each other or the interests of the other stockholders.

Risks Related to Our Products


Our COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems may not gain wide industry acceptance, and industry adoption of alternative technology could negatively impact our ability to compete successfully.

Of the 171 manufacturers and commercial laboratories to receive an EUA for COVID‑19 diagnostics as of July 31, 2020, 35 were for serology tests, 134 were for molecular tests, and 2 were for antigen tests. Customers or the industry as a whole could adopt alternative technologies for testing, including molecular point‑of‑care testing, which could result in lower demand for our antigen test. Various advances in the treatment and monitoring of patients could cause lower demand for the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems, including our revised DPP SARS‑CoV‑2 Antigen System or for antigen testing for COVID‑19 as a whole.

COVID‑19 is prone to genetic mutations which may impact the ability of the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems to adequately detect COVID‑19 or SARS-CoV-2 antigens and could adversely affect demand for the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems and harm our competitive position.

False test results are a risk with all laboratory tests, including COVID‑19 diagnostic tests. False results can occur in the presence or absence of a mutation in the COVID‑19 virus. In the presence of a mutation in the virus, false results can occur if a mutation occurs in the region of the virus that the test is designed to assess. False results may occur with  the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems in the presence or absence of one or more COVID‑19 mutations. If false negatives occur with  the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems, it will may reduce customer confidence in the accuracy of  the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems and harm our competitive position.

For Our Businessour business to Succeedsucceed in the Future, Our Currentfuture, our current and Future Products Must Receive Market Acceptance.future products must receive market acceptance.


Market acceptance and the timing of such acceptance, of our new products or technologies is necessary for our future success. To achieve market acceptance, we and our distributors will likely be required to undertake substantial efforts and spend significant funds to inform every one of the existence and perceived benefits of our products. We also may require government funding for the purchase of our products to help create market acceptance and expand the use of our products.


It may be difficult evaluate the market reaction to our products and our marketing efforts for new products may not be successful. The government funding we receive may be limited for new products. As such, there can be no assurance that any products will obtain significant market acceptance and fill the market need that is perceived to exist on a timely basis, or at all.


We may not have Sufficient Resourcessufficient resources to Effectively Introduceeffectively introduce and Market Our Products,market our products, which could Materially Harm Our Operating Results.materially harm our operating results.


Introducing and achieving market acceptance for our new products will require substantial marketing efforts and will require us and/or our contract partners, sales agents, and/or distributors to make significant expenditures of time and money. In some instances we will be significantly or totally reliant on the marketing efforts and expenditures of our contract partners, sales agents, and distributors. If they do not have or commit the expertise and resources to effectively market the products that we manufacture, our operating results will be materially harmed.


New Developmentsdevelopments in Health Treatmentshealth treatments and Non-Diagnostic Productsnon‑diagnostic products may Reducereduce or Eliminateeliminate the Demanddemand for Our Products.our products.


The development and commercialization of products outside of the diagnostics industry could adversely affect sales of our products. For example, the development of a safe and effective vaccine to HIV or treatments for other diseases or conditions that our products are designed to detect, could reduce or eventually eliminate the demand for our HIV or other diagnostic products and result in a loss of revenues.


Our future success will depend on our ability to increase manufacturing production capacity through the implementation of additional customized manufacturing automation equipment.

One of our key challenges will be to increase our production capacity to meet sales demand while maintaining product quality and reducing production costs. Our primary strategy to accomplish this consists of the implementation of additional customized automation equipment. The equipment we order may not be delivered in a timely manner, and, once delivered, the equipment may require significant time and effort in order to operate in the manner required to produce high quality products. We experienced significant unexpected delays before our current automation equipment operated in the manner for which it was designed. The investments we make in this equipment may not yield the anticipated labor and material efficiencies. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed if we are unable to timely obtain automation equipment that meets our requirements or if there are significant increases in the costs of equipment.

Sales Cyclescycles for Our Productsour products can be Lengthy,lengthy, which can Cause Variabilitycause variability and Unpredictabilityunpredictability in Our Business.our business.


Some of our products may require lengthy and unpredictable sales cycles, which makes it more difficult to accurately forecast revenues in a given period and may cause revenues and operating results to vary from period to period. Our products may involve sales to large public and private institutions which may require many levels of approval and may be dependent on economic or political conditions and the availability of grants or funding from government or public health agencies which can vary from period to period. There can be no assurance that purchases or funding from these agencies will occur or continue, especially if current negative economic conditions continue or intensify. As a result, we may expend considerable resources on unsuccessful sales efforts or we may not be able to complete transactions at all or on a schedule and in an amount consistent with our objectives.

We May Face Product Liability Claimsmay face product liability claims for Injuries.injuries.


The testing, manufacturing and marketing of medical diagnostic products involves an inherent risk of product liability claims. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit or cease sales of our products. We cannot be sure that we will not incur liabilities in excess of the policy limits of our existing product liability insurance coverage or that we will be able to continue to obtain adequate product liability insurance coverage in the future at an acceptable cost, or at all. In addition, a defect in the design or manufacture of our products could have a material adverse effect on our reputation in the industry and subject us to claims of liability for injury and otherwise. Any substantial underinsured loss resulting from such a claim could have a material adverse effect on our profitability, and the damage to our reputation in the industry could have a material adverse effect on our business.


Our Customerscustomers may not Adopt Rapid Point-of-Care Diagnostic Testing.adopt rapid point‑of‑care diagnostic testing.


Rapid point-of-carepoint‑of‑care tests are beneficial because, among other things, they can be administered by healthcare providers in their own facilities or used by consumers at home without sending samples to central laboratories. But currently the majority of diagnostic tests used by physicians and other healthcare providers in the U.S. are provided by clinical reference laboratories and hospital-basedhospital‑based laboratories. In some international markets, such as Europe, diagnostic testing is performed primarily by centralized laboratories. Future sales of our products will depend, in part, on our ability to expand market acceptance of rapid point-of-carepoint‑of‑care testing and successfully compete against laboratory testing methods and products. However, we expect that clinical reference and other hospital-basedhospital‑based laboratories will continue to compete vigorously against our rapid point-of-carepoint‑of‑care products. Even if we can demonstrate that our products are more cost effective, save time, or have better performance or other benefits, physicians, other healthcare providers and consumers may resist changing to rapid point-of-carepoint‑of‑care tests and instead may choose to obtain diagnostic results through laboratory tests. If we fail to achieve and expand market acceptance of our rapid point-of-carepoint‑of‑care diagnostic tests with customers, it would have a negative effect on our future sales growth.


Customer Concentration Creates Risksconcentration creates risks for Our Business.our business.


A significant portion of our revenues each year comes from a few large customers. To the extent that such a large customer fails to meet its purchase commitments, changes its ordering patterns or business strategy, or otherwise reduces its purchases or stops purchasing our products, or if we experience difficulty in meeting the demand by these customers for our products, our revenues and results of operations could be adversely affected.


If Our Productsour products do not Perform Properly, Itperform properly, it may Affect Our Revenues, Stock Priceaffect our revenues, stock price and Reputation.reputation.


Our products may not perform as expected. For example, a defect in one of our diagnostic products or a failure by a customer to follow proper testing procedures may cause the product to report inaccurate information. Identifying the root cause of a product performance or quality issue can be difficult and time consuming.


If our products do not to perform in accordance with the applicable label claims or otherwise in accordance with the expectations or needs of our customers, customers may switch to a competing product or otherwise stop using our products, and our revenues could be negatively affected. If this occurs, we may be required to implement holds or product recalls and incur warranty obligations. Furthermore, the poor performance by one or more of our products could have an adverse effect on our reputation, our continuing ability to sell products and the price of our Common Stock.

If We Expand Our International Presence, It may Increase Our Risks and Expose Our Business to Regulatory, Cultural or Other Challenges.

We will continue to try to increase revenue derived from international sales of our products. There are several of factors that could adversely affect the performance of our business and/or cause us to incur substantially increased costs because of our international presence and sales, including: (i) uncertainty in the application of foreign laws and the interpretation of contracts with foreign parties; (ii) cultural and political differences that favor local competitors or make it difficult to effectively market, sell and gain acceptance of our products; (iii) exchange rates, currency fluctuations, tariffs and other barriers, extended payment terms and dependence on international distributors or representatives; (iv) trade protection measures, trade sanctions and import/export licensing requirements; (v) our inability to obtain or maintain regulatory approvals or registrations for our products; (vi) Economic conditions, political instability, the absence of available funding sources, terrorism, civil unrest, war and natural disasters in foreign countries; (vii) Reduced protection for, or enforcement of, our patents and other intellectual property rights in foreign countries; (viii) our inability to identify international distributors and negotiate acceptable terms for distribution agreements; and (ix) restrictions on our ability to repatriate investments and earnings from foreign operations.

Economic, cultural and political conditions and foreign regulatory requirements may slow or prevent the manufacture of our products in countries other than the United States. Interruption of the supply of our products could reduce revenues or cause us to incur significant additional expenses in finding an alternative source of supply. Foreign currency fluctuations and economic conditions in foreign countries could also increase the costs of manufacturing our products in foreign countries.


Financial, Economic and Financing Risks


We have incurred losses in recent years and we are uncertain about our future profitability.


We incurred an operating loss every year from 2014 through 2019.2020. Under our operating plans, we have made, and plan to continue to make, significant investments in our production capacity, including in expanding facilities and automating manufacturing, and in our sales and marketing, regulatory approval, and research and development activities. Our ability to achieve profitability and generate cash flow in the future will depend on our ability to increase sales of our existing products and to successfully introduce new and enhanced products into the marketplace, all while controlling and managing our expenses consistent with our operating plan.


If we are unable to increase our revenues and manage our expenses in accordance with our operating plan, our operating results would be harmed and we may not be able to generate the cash flow needed to fund the investments in our production capacity and other activities, we will be required to implement one or both of the following:


We could reduce the level, or otherwise delay the timing, of the anticipated investments in our production capacity and other activities, which would likely curtail or delay the growth in our business contemplated by our operating plan and could impair or defer our ability to achieve profitability and generate cash flow.
We could raise additional funds through public or private financings, strategic relationships, or other arrangements, to the extent funding would be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we succeed in raising additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible securities, then the issuance could result in substantial dilution to existing stockholders. Furthermore, the holders of these new securities or debt may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of the holders of our Common Stock.
We could reduce the level, or otherwise delay the timing, of the anticipated investments in our production capacity and other activities, which would likely curtail or delay the growth in our business contemplated by our operating plan and could impair or defer our ability to achieve profitability and generate cash flow.
We could raise additional funds through public or private financings, strategic relationships, or other arrangements, to the extent funding would be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we succeed in raising additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible securities, then the issuance could result in substantial dilution to existing stockholders. Furthermore, the holders of these new securities or debt may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of the holders of our Common Stock.


In such circumstances, we also would need to forego acquisition opportunities, which could impede our ability to grow our business.

Our Financial Resultsfinancial results may Fluctuate.fluctuate.


From quarter to quarter and year to year, our operating results can fluctuate, which could cause our growth or financial performance to fail to meet the expectations of investors and securities analysts. Sales to our distributors and other customers may not meet expectations because of lower than expected customer demand or other factors, including continued economic volatility and disruption, reduced governmental funding, and other circumstances described elsewhere in this report. A variety of factors could also contribute to the variability of our financial results, including infrequent, unusual or unexpected changes in revenues or costs.


Different products provide dissimilar contributions to our gross product margin. Accordingly, our operating results could also fluctuate and be negatively affected by the mix of products sold and the relative prices and gross product margin contribution of those products. Failure to achieve operating results consistent with the expectations of investors and securities analysts could adversely affect our reputation and the price of our Common Stock.


The failure to comply with the terms of our Credit Agreement and Guaranty could result in a default under its terms and, if uncured, could result in action against our pledged assets and dilution of our stockholders.


On September 3, 2019, we entered into a Credit Agreement and Guaranty, or Credit Agreement, with Perceptive Credit Holdings II, LP, or Perceptive. Under the Credit Agreement, we received a $20,000,000 senior secured term loan credit facility, which was drawn in full on September 4, 2019. In connection with the Credit Agreement, we issued a warrant to purchase up to 550,000 shares of our common stock. The credit agreement is secured by a first priority, perfected lien on substantially all of our property and assets, including our equity interests in our subsidiaries.


The Credit Agreement also contains covenants that restrict our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage in other business activities. The Credit Agreement restricts our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to:


incur, assume or guarantee additional Indebtedness (as defined in the Credit Agreement);
repurchase capital stock;
make other restricted payments including, without limitation, paying dividends and making investments;
create liens;
sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries;
enter into agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries;
enter into mergers or consolidations; and
enter into transactions with affiliates
incur, assume or guarantee additional Indebtedness (as defined in the Credit Agreement);
repurchase capital stock;
make other restricted payments including, without limitation, paying dividends and making investments;
create liens;
sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries;
enter into agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries;
enter into mergers or consolidations; and
enter into transactions with affiliates


In addition, the Credit Agreement also contain covenants requiring us and our subsidiaries to maintain cash and cash equivalents held in one or more accounts subject to the first priority perfected security interests of the lenders under the Credit Agreement of not less than $3,000,000. The Credit Agreement also provides for specified quarterly minimum consolidated net revenue covenants of us and our subsidiaries for the trailing twelve-monthtwelve‑month period ended on each such calculation date during the term of the Credit Agreement. A breach of any of these covenants would result in a default under the Credit Agreement. If an event of default under our Credit Agreements occurs, Perceptive could elect to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. If we were unable to pay such amounts, Perceptive could proceed against the collateral pledged to them. We have pledged our inventory, accounts receivable, cash, securities, other general intangibles and the capital stock of certain subsidiaries to the lenders. In such an event, we cannot assure you that we would have sufficient assets to pay amounts due under the Credit Agreement.


Servicing our debt will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate sufficient cash to service our debt depends on many factors beyond our control.


Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our debt, to fund planned capital expenditures, and to maintain sufficient working capital depends on our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or from other sources in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our debt or to fund our other liquidity needs. In the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, our operations used $9.1$18.9 million in cash. If our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to allow us to make scheduled payments on our debt, we may need seek additional capital or restructure or refinance all or a portion of our debt on or before the maturity thereof, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We cannot assure you that, if needed, we would be able to refinance any of our debt on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or that the terms of that debt will allow any of the above alternative measures or that these measures would satisfy our scheduled debt service obligations. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to repay or refinance our debt on favorable terms, it could significantly adversely affect our financial condition. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition. Any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain any financing when needed.


The LIBOR calculation method may change, and LIBOR is expected to be phased out after 2021, which may adversely affect our interest expenses under the Credit Agreement and Guaranty.

Loans under the Credit Agreement and Guaranty bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) the greater of the one‑month London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, and 2.5% plus (b) 8.75%. At any time at which an event of default has occurred and is continuing, the interest rate will increase by 4.0%. Accrued interest is payable on a monthly basis. On July 27, 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority announced that it will no longer require banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. On November 30, 2020, ICE Benchmark Administration, or IBA, the administrator of LIBOR, with the support of the United States Federal Reserve and the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, announced plans to consult on ceasing publication of USD LIBOR on December 31, 2021 for only the one week and two month USD LIBOR tenors, and on June 30, 2023 for all other USD LIBOR tenors. While this announcement extends the transition period to June 2023, the United States Federal Reserve concurrently issued a statement advising banks to stop new USD LIBOR issuances by the end of 2021. In light of these recent announcements, the future of LIBOR at this time is uncertain and any changes in the methods by which LIBOR is determined or regulatory activity related to LIBOR’s phaseout could cause LIBOR to perform differently than in the past or cease to exist.

At this time, no consensus exists as to what rate or rates will become accepted alternatives to LIBOR, although The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, is considering replacing U.S. dollar LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, a newly created index, calculated with a broad set of short‑term repurchase agreements backed by treasury securities. It is not possible to predict the effect of these changes, other reforms or the establishment of alternative reference rates in the United States or elsewhere.

Pursuant to the Credit Agreement and Guaranty, if LIBOR becomes unavailable in the future, the Administrative Agent and Borrower (as such terms are defined in the Credit Agreement and Guaranty) may select an alternative benchmark rate, which may include SOFR. To the extent our interest rates increase as a result, our interest expense will increase, in which event we may have difficulties making interest payments and funding our other fixed costs, and our available cash flow for general corporate requirements may be adversely affected.

Our Operating Resultsoperating results may be Negatively Affectednegatively affected by Changeschanges in Foreign Currency Exchange Rates.foreign currency exchange rates.


In the past our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk has not been material. Nevertheless, sales of our products are subject to currency risks, since changes in the values of foreign currencies relative to the value of the U.S. dollar can render our products comparatively more expensive. The fluctuations in the exchange rate could negatively impact international sales of our products, as could changes in the general economic conditions.


The revenues and expenses of Chembio Diagnostics Malaysia, opTricon and Orangelife, one of our subsidiaries, are recorded in Malaysian Ringgit, in Euros and Brazilian Real, respectively. Revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars for purposes of reporting our consolidated financial results. Our expectation is that the Chembio Diagnostics Malaysia, opTricon and Orangelife businesses will continue to grow and, consequently, our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates may grow as well.


Our foreign subsidiaries’ revenues and expenses and the translation of their financial results into U.S. dollars may be negatively affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate. Favorable movement in exchange rates have benefited us in prior periods. However, where there are unfavorable currency exchange rate fluctuations, our consolidated financial statements could be negatively affected. Furthermore, fluctuations in exchange rates could affect year-to-yearyear‑to‑year comparability of operating results. In the past, we have not generally entered into hedging instruments to manage our currency exchange rate risk, but we may need to do so in the future. However, our attempts to hedge against these risks may not be successful. If we are unable to successfully hedge against unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate movements, our consolidated financial results may be adversely impacted.


We Operateoperate in Countriescountries where there is or may be Widespread Corruption.widespread corruption.


We have a policy in place prohibiting our employees, distributors and agents from engaging in corrupt business practices, including activities prohibited by the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Nevertheless, because we work through independent sales agents and distributors outside the United States, we do not have control over the day-to-dayday‑to‑day activities of such independent agents and distributors. In addition, in the donor-fundeddonor‑funded markets in Africa where we sell our products, there is significant oversight from PEPFAR, the Global Fund, and advisory committees comprised of technical experts concerning the development and establishment of national testing protocols. This is a process that includes an overall assessment of a product which includes extensive product performance evaluations including five active collaborations and manufacturer’s quality systems, as well as price and delivery. In Brazil, where we operate our subsidiary Orangelife and have had numerous product collaborations with FIOCRUZ, the programs through which our products may be deployed are all funded by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Although FIOCRUZ is affiliated with the Brazilian Ministry of Health, and is its sole customer, FIOCRUZ is not the exclusive supplier for the Ministry of Health. However, because each of our previous collaborations with FIOCRUZ incorporates a technology transfer aspect, we believe we have a competitive advantage versus other suppliers to the Brazilian Ministry of Health, assuming other aspects of our product offering through FIOCRUZ are otherwise competitive in comparison. We have no knowledge or reason to know of any activities by our employees, distributors or sales agents of any actions which could be in violation of the FCPA, although there can be no assurance of this.

Our subsidiary Chembio Diagnostics Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. is located in Malaysia. There have been numerous high-profilehigh‑profile corruption cases, and corruption is one of the most problematic factors for doing business in Malaysia. While the Malaysian government has acknowledged the problem, it appears that endemic corruption is continuing and that market-basedmarket‑based principles are not applied in cases involving individuals with high-levelhigh‑level political access. To the extent bribery and similar practices continue to exist in Malaysia, U.S. companies such as ours, which are subject to U.S. laws making it illegal to pay bribes to foreign officials, may make us less competitive in winning business in Malaysia when competing with non-U.S.non‑U.S. companies.


Changes in Interpretationinterpretation or Applicationapplication of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles may Adversely Affect Our Operating Results.adversely affect our operating results.


We prepare our financial statements to conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These principles are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission and various other regulatory or accounting bodies. A change in interpretations of, or our application of, these principles can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before a change is announced. Additionally, as we are required to adopt new accounting standards, our methods of accounting for certain items may change, which could cause our results of operations to fluctuate from period to period. For example, upon adoption of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), we now recognize revenue upon transfer of control, which is generally at time of delivery. Under the previous accounting guidance, we recognized revenue upon acceptance when and if we had production responsibilities. If circumstances change over time or interpretation of the revenue recognition rules change, we could be required to adjust the timing of recognizing revenue and our financial results could suffer.


We Base Our Estimatesbase our estimates or Judgments Relatingjudgments relating to Critical Accounting Policiescritical accounting policies on Assumptionsassumptions that can Changechange or Proveprove to be Incorrect.incorrect.


Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on such statements. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. We continuously evaluate significant estimates used in preparing our financial statements, including those related to (i) revenue recognition;recognition, including uncertainties related to variable consideration and milestones; (ii) stock-basedstock‑based compensation; (iii) allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable; (iv) inventory reserves and obsolescence; (v) customer sales returns and allowances; (vi) contingencies; and (vii) income taxes, (viii) goodwill and intangibles, (ix) business acquisition, and (x) research and development costs.


For example, for the quarter ended June 30, 2020, our cost of product sales included the cost of COVID‑19 systems that were produced and shipped outside the U.S., but for which revenue was not recognized in the quarter. We decided we were unable to recognize the revenue from those shipments in the second quarter due to the GAAP requirement that we have a high degree of confidence that it is probable that a significant reversal in revenue will not occur in the future. Many factors can affect such a decision, including, for example, actions of third parties and other considerations that are outside our influence or control. As a result, we recognized negative gross margin in the quarter.

Our estimates are based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, as set forth in our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these and other estimates if our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions. If our operating results fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, the price of our Common Stock may decline.

Our Global Operations may be Adversely Effected by the Coronavirus Outbreak and Face Risks that could Impact our Business.

A novel strain of coronavirus, COVID-19, originated in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. As of March 2020, the virus has spread globally, including to the United States, Malaysia, Germany and Brazil. Our business operations in those locations are subject to potential business interruptions arising from protective measures that may be taken by the respective governments, agencies or other governing bodies in each country. Business disruptions in other countries also could negatively affect the sources and availability of components and materials that are essential to the operation of our business. Extended periods of interruption to our U.S. or international operations due to the coronavirus outbreak could adversely impact the growth of our business, could cause us to cease or delay operations, and could prevent our customers from receiving shipments or processing payments.

The extent to which the coronavirus impacts our global business, sales and results of operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. This includes new information that may emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus, the spread and proliferation of the coronavirus around the world, and the actions taken to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others.

Our Business may be Negatively Affected by Terrorist Attacks or Natural Disasters.

Terrorist attacks or natural disasters could cause economic instability. These events could negatively affect economic conditions both within and outside the United States and harm demand for our products. The operations of our customers and suppliers could be negatively impacted and eliminate, reduce or delay our customers’ ability to purchase and use our products and our suppliers’ ability to provide raw materials and finished products.

Our facilities, including some pieces of manufacturing equipment and our computer systems, may be difficult to replace. Various types of disasters, including fires, earthquakes, floods and acts of terrorism, may affect our facilities and computer systems. In the event our existing facilities or computer systems are affected by man-made or natural disasters, we may have difficulty operating our business and may be unable to manufacture products for sale or meet customer demands or sales projections. If our manufacturing operations were curtailed or shut down entirely, it would seriously harm our business.


Risks Related to Intellectual Property


Our Success Dependssuccess depends on Our Abilityour ability to Protect Our Proprietary Technology.protect our proprietary technology. We Relyrely on Trade Secret Lawstrade secret laws and Agreementsagreements with Our Key Employeesour key employees and Other Third Partiesother third parties to Protect Our Proprietary Rights,protect our proprietary rights, and Wewe cannot be sure that these Lawslaws or Agreementsagreements will Adequately Protect Our Rights.adequately protect our rights.


Our industry places considerable importance on obtaining patent, trademark and trade secret protection, as well as other intellectual property rights, for new technologies, products and processes. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to develop and maintain a strong intellectual property portfolio or obtain licenses to patents and technologies, both in the United States and in other countries. If we cannot continue to develop, obtain and protect intellectual property rights, our revenues and gross profits could be adversely affected. Moreover, our current and future licenses or other rights to patents and other technologies may not be adequate for the operation of our business.


As appropriate, we intend to file patent applications and obtain patent protection for our proprietary technology. These patent applications and patents will cover, as applicable, compositions of matter for our products, methods of making those products, methods of using those products and apparatuses relating to the use or manufacture of those products. However, there have been changes to the patent laws and proposed changes to the rules of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which may impact our ability to protect our technology and enforce our intellectual property rights. For example, in 2011, the U.S. enacted sweeping changes to the U.S. patent system under the Leahy-SmithLeahy‑Smith America Invents Act, including changes that would transition the U.S. from a “first-to-invent”“first‑to‑invent” system to a “first-to-file”“first‑to‑file” system and alter the processes for challenging issued patents. These changes could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents.


We believe that factors such as the technological and creative skills of our personnel, strategic relationships, new product developments, frequent product enhancements and name recognition are essential to our success. All our management personnel are bound by non-disclosurenon‑disclosure agreements. If personnel leave our employment, in some cases we would be required to protect our intellectual property rights pursuant to common law theories which may be less protective than provisions of employment, non-competitionnon‑competition or non-disclosurenon‑disclosure agreements.


We seek to protect our proprietary products under trade secret and copyright laws, enter into license agreements for various materials and methods employed in our products, and enter into strategic relationships for distribution of the products. These strategies afford only limited protection. We currently have some foreign patents issued, and we are seeking additional patent protection in several other foreign jurisdictions for our DPP and optical technology. We have licenses to reagents (antigens and peptides) used in several of our products and products under development. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary assets, and respect the intellectual property rights of others, we participate in several markets where intellectual property rights protections are of little or no value. This can place our products and our company at a competitive disadvantage.
Moreover, issued patents remain in effect for a fixed period and after expiration will not provide protection of the inventions they cover. Once our patents expire, we may be faced with increased competition, which could reduce our revenues. We may also not be able to successfully protect our rights to unpatented trade secrets and know-how.know‑how.


To facilitate development and commercialization of a proprietary technology base, we may need to obtain additional licenses to patents or other proprietary rights from other parties. Obtaining and maintaining these licenses, which may not be available, may require the payment of up-frontup‑front fees and royalties. In addition, if we are unable to obtain these types of licenses, our product development and commercialization efforts may be delayed or precluded.


Any Future Intellectual Property Disputesfuture intellectual property disputes could Require Significant Resourcerequire significant resource and Limitlimit or Eliminate Our Abilityeliminate our ability to Sell Productssell products or Use Certain Technologies.use certain technologies.


We may be required to expend substantial resources in asserting or protecting our intellectual property rights, or in defending suits related to intellectual property rights. We may seek to enforce our patents or other intellectual property rights through litigation. Such litigation is prevalent and is expected to continue. In our business, there are a large number of patents and patent applications similar to our products, and additional patents may be issued to third parties relating to our product areas. We, our customers or our suppliers may be sued for infringement of patents or misappropriation of other intellectual property rights with respect to one or more of our products. We may also have disputes with parties that license patents to us if we believe the license is no longer needed for our products or the licensed patents are no longer valid or enforceable.


There are a large number of patents in our industry, and the claims of these patents appear to overlap in many cases. Therefore there is a significant amount of uncertainty regarding the extent of patent protection and infringement. Companies may have pending patent applications, which are typically confidential for the first eighteen months following filing that cover technologies we incorporate in our products. Accordingly, we may be subjected to substantial damages for past infringement or be required to modify our products or stop selling them if it is ultimately determined that our products infringe a third party’s proprietary rights. In addition, governmental agencies could commence investigations or criminal proceedings against our employees or us relating to claims of misuse or misappropriation of another party’s proprietary rights.


If we are involved in litigation or other legal proceedings with respect to patents or other intellectual property and proprietary technology, it could adversely affect our revenues, results of operations, market share and business because (1) it could consume a substantial portion of managerial and financial resources; (2) its outcome would be uncertain and a court may find that our patents are invalid or unenforceable in response to claims by another party or that the third-partythird‑party patent claims are valid and infringed by our products; (3) the pendency of any litigation may in and of itself cause our distributors and customers to reduce or terminate purchases of our products; (4) a court could award a preliminary and/or permanent injunction, which would prevent us from selling our current or future products; and (5) an adverse outcome could subject us to the loss of the protection of our patents or to liability in the form of past royalty payments, penalties, reimbursement of litigation costs and legal fees, special and punitive damages, or future royalty payments, any of which could significantly affect our future earnings.


Under certain contracts with third parties, we may indemnify the other party if our products or activities have actually or allegedly infringed upon, misappropriated or misused another party’s proprietary rights. Furthermore, our products may contain technology provided to us by third parties, and we may be unable to determine in advance whether such technology infringes the intellectual property rights of a third party. These other parties may also not be required or financially able to indemnify us in the event that an infringement or misappropriation claim is asserted against us.


There may also be other types of disputes that we become involved in regarding intellectual property rights, including state, federal or foreign court litigation, and patent interference, patent reissue, patent reexamination, or trademark opposition proceedings in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Opposition or revocation proceedings could be instituted in a foreign patent office as well. These proceedings permit certain persons to challenge the validity of a patent on the grounds that it was known from the prior art. The filing of such proceedings, or the issuance of an adverse decision in such proceedings, could result in the loss of valuable patent rights that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

Risks Related to Our Third Party Collaborators


Our Useuse of Third-Party Suppliers,third‑party suppliers, some of which may Constitute Our Sole Supply Source,constitute our sole supply source, for Certain Important Product Componentscertain important product components and Materials Presents Risksmaterials presents risks that Could Have Negative Consequencescould have negative consequences for Our Business.our business.


We purchase certain HIV antigens, a syphilis antigen, COVID‑19 antigens, the nitrocellulose, and certain other critical components used in our STAT-PAK, STAT-VIEW,STAT‑PAK, STAT‑VIEW, SURE CHECK and DPP product lines from a sole or limited number of sources. If for any reason these suppliers become unwilling or unable to supply our antigen, nitrocellulose, or other critical component needs, we believe that alternative supplies could be obtained at a competitive cost. However, a change in any of the antigens, nitrocellulose or other critical components used in our products would require additional development work and approval by the FDA and other regulatory agencies. In addition, it may be difficult to find such an alternate supply source in a reasonable time period or on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. As a result, the termination or limitation of our relationship with one or more of these suppliers could require significant time to complete, increase our costs, and disrupt or discontinue our ability to manufacture and sell the affected products. In addition, governmental purchasers or funding programs in a particular country may require that we purchase key components from suppliers in that country, which could significantly limit our ability to obtain the components with the quality, and at the price, we seek.


With some of these suppliers, we do not have long-termlong‑term agreements and instead purchase components and materials through a purchase order process. As a result, these suppliers may stop supplying us components and materials, limit the allocation of supply and equipment to us due to increased industry demand, or significantly increase their prices at any time with little or no advance notice. Our reliance on a limited number of suppliers could also result in delivery problems, reduced control over product pricing and quality, and our inability to identify and qualify another supplier in a timely manner.


Moreover, some of these suppliers may experience financial difficulties that could prevent them from supplying us with components or subassemblies used in the design and manufacture of our products. In addition, these suppliers may experience manufacturing delays or shut downs due to circumstances beyond their control, such as complications related to COVID‑19, labor issues, political unrest or natural disasters.


Any supply chain deficiencies could materially and adversely affect our ability to fulfill customer orders and our results of operations. The availability of critical components and materials from sole-sole‑ or limited source suppliers could reduce our control over pricing, quality and timely delivery, increase our costs, could disrupt our ability to manufacture and sell, and preclude us from manufacturing and selling, certain of our products into one or more markets. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow and business.


We May Workmay work with Strategic Collaboratorsstrategic collaborators to Assistassist in Developingdeveloping and Commercializing Our Products,commercializing our products, which could Limit Rights We Receivelimit rights we receive from the Collaborationscollaborations and Exposes Usexposes us to Other Risks Outside Our Control.other risks outside our control.


Some business opportunities that require a technology controlled by a third party, a significant level of investment for development and commercialization or a distribution network beyond our existing sales force may necessitate involving one or more strategic collaborators. As part of our strategy for development and commercialization of our products, we may enter into arrangements with distributors or other third-parties.third‑parties. Relying on such collaborative relationships could be risky to our business for a number of reasons, including: (i) we may be required to transfer material rights to such strategic collaborators, licensees and others; (ii) our collaborators may not obtain regulatory approvals necessary to continue the collaborations in a timely manner; (iii) our collaborators may decide to terminate our collaborative arrangement or become insolvent; (iv) our collaborators may develop technologies or components competitive with our products; (v) disagreements with collaborators could result in the termination of the relationship or litigation; and (vi) we may not be able to agree to future collaborative arrangements, or renewals of existing collaborative agreements, on acceptable terms or at all.

We expect our collaborators will have an economic motivation to succeed in performing their contractual responsibilities under our agreements, there is no assurance that they will do so. Due to our reliance on strategic agreements, it can make it difficult to accurately forecast our future revenues and operating results.


Our Abilityability to Grow Our Businessgrow our business will be Limitedlimited if We Failwe fail to Maintain Existing Distribution Channelsmaintain existing distribution channels or Develop New Distribution Channels.develop new distribution channels.


We collaborate with laboratories, diagnostic companies and distributors in order to sell our products. The sale of our products depends in large part on our ability to sell products to these customers and on the marketing and distribution abilities of the companies with which we collaborate and work with.


By relying on distributors or third-partiesthird‑parties to market and sell our products could negatively impact our business for various reasons, including: (i) we may not be able to find suitable distributors for our products on satisfactory terms, or at all; (ii) agreements with distributors may prematurely terminate or may result in litigation between the parties; (iii) our distributors or other customers may not fulfill their contractual obligations and distribute our products in the manner or at the levels we expect; (iv) our distributors may prioritize their own private label products that compete with our products; (v) Our existing distributor relationships or contracts may preclude or limit us from entering into arrangements with other distributors; and (vi) we may not be able to negotiate new or renew existing distribution agreements on acceptable terms, or at all.


We will try to maintain and expand our business with distributors and customers and make every effort to require that they fulfill their contractual obligations, but there can be no assurance that such companies will do so or that new distribution channels will be available on satisfactory terms. If we are unable to do so, our business will be negatively impacted.


Our U.S. Government Contracts Require Compliancecontracts require compliance with Numerous Lawsnumerous laws and Increases Our Riskincreases our risk and Liability.liability.


We are currently receiving funding from the U.S. government related to DPP Zika, and our growth strategy targets sales to U.S. government entities. As a result of our U.S. government funding and potential product sales to the U.S. government, we must comply with laws and regulations relating to the award, administration and performance of U.S. government contracts. U.S. government contracts typically contain a number of extraordinary provisions that would not typically be found in commercial contracts and which may create a disadvantage and additional risks to us as compared to competitors that do not rely on government contracts. As a U.S. government contractor, we are subject to increased risks of investigation, criminal prosecution and other legal actions and liabilities to which purely private sector companies are not. The results of any such actions could adversely impact our business and have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial performance.


A violation of specific laws and regulations could result in the imposition of fines and penalties or the termination of our contracts, as well as suspension or debarment. The suspension or debarment in any particular case may be limited to the facility, contract or subsidiary involved in the violation or could be applied to our entire enterprise in certain severe circumstances. Even a narrow scope suspension or debarment could result in negative publicity that could adversely affect our ability to renew contracts and to secure new contracts, both with the U.S. government and private customers, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. Fines and penalties could be imposed for failing to follow procurement integrity and bidding rules, employing improper billing practices or otherwise failing to follow rules relating to billing on cost-pluscost‑plus contracts, receiving or paying kickbacks, or filing false claims, among other potential violations. In addition, we could suffer serious reputational harm and the value of our Common Stock could be negatively affected if allegations of impropriety related to such contracts are made against us.


Our U.S. Government Contractsgovernment contracts are Subjectsubject to Future Fundingfuture funding and the Government’s Choicegovernment’s choice to Exercise Options,exercise options, and may be Terminatedterminated at the Government’s Convenience.government’s convenience.


Our contracts with the U.S. government are subject to future funding and are subject to the right of the government to terminate the contracts in whole or in part for its convenience. There is pressure for the U.S. government to reduce spending. The non-appropriationnon‑appropriation of funds or the termination for the government’s convenience of our contracts could negatively affect our financial results. If levels of U.S. government expenditures and authorizations for emerging diseases decrease or shift to programs in areas where we do not offer products or are not developing product candidates, or if the U.S. government otherwise declines to exercise its options under its contracts with us, our business, revenues and other operating results would suffer.


Risks Related to Regulations


BecauseCOVID‑19 diagnostic tests, including  the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems, are subject to changes in CLIA, FDA, ANVISA and other regulatory requirements.

Our COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems are subject to regulations of the FDA, International Organization for Standards and other regulatory requirements, including ANVISA, Brazil’s health regulatory agency. The regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems may be unclear and are subject to change. Newly promulgated regulations could require changes to COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems, necessitate additional procedures, or make it impractical or impossible for us to market COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems for certain uses, in certain markets, or at all. The FDA and other regulatory authorities also have the ability to impose new or additional requirements relating to the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems. The implementation of such changes or new or additional requirements may result in a substantial additional costs and could delay or make it more difficult or complicated to sell our products.

On February 4, 2020, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued a declaration that the threat to public health posed by COVID-19 justify the emergency use of unapproved in vitro diagnostics for the detection or diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. Under Section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, because the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has issued this declaration, the Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, is authorized to issue EUAs to permit certain developers of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics to begin offering the tests for detection and diagnosis of COVID-19 without having completed the normally applicable FDA review and clearance or approval process for marketing authorization. We received an EUA for the DPP COVID-19 IgM/IgG System on April 14, 2020, which was subsequent revoked by the FDA on June 16, 2020. Such revocation precludes the sale of DPP COVID‑19 IgM/IgG Systems in the United States unless and until a further regulatory approval or authorization is obtained. We have not received a subsequent EUA for any of the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems, and we do not currently have an application pending for any such EUA. Moreover, market and regulatory requirements continue to change at a rapid pace. The FDA has announced, for example, that it intends to update its EUA templates with additional considerations related to the impact of genetic variants on test performance as the FDA learns more about the COVID-19 disease and its knowledge in this area progresses. The time required to obtain marketing authorizations and other approvals from regulatory authorities is unpredictable. The standards that the FDA and its foreign counterparts use when evaluating clinical trial data can change, and does often change, during development, which makes it difficult to predict with any certainty how they will be applied. If we make future submissions to the FDA, we may also encounter unexpected delays or increased costs due to new government regulations, including future legislation or administrative action, or changes in FDA policy during the period of FDA regulatory review. There can be no assurance that, if we are to make a submission of any future EUA application, we will be successful in obtaining an EUA that would permit us to offer and sell any COVID-19 Diagnostic Test System in the United States.

We are subject to governmental export controls that could impair our ability to compete in international markets.

The United States and various foreign governments have imposed controls, export license requirements and restrictions on the export of certain products and technologies. We must export our products in compliance with export controls in the United States, including the Commerce Department’s Export Administration Regulations and various economic and trade sanctions established by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls. We may not always be Ablesuccessful in obtaining necessary export licenses, and our failure to Obtainobtain required import or Maintainexport approval for our products or limitations on our ability to export or sell our products imposed by these laws may harm our international and domestic sales and adversely affect our revenue. Noncompliance with these laws could have negative consequences, including government investigations, penalties and reputational harm.

If the Necessary Regulatory Approvals for SomeUnited States government imposes restrictions on the export of Our Products, WeCOVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems, or any of our other products, such restrictions could have a material impact on our ability to sell our products to existing or potential customers outside of the United States and harm our ability to compete internationally. Any change in export regulations or legislation, or change in the countries, persons or technologies targeted by export regulations, could decrease our ability to export or sell our products outside the United States or to existing or potential customers with international operations. Changes in our ability to sell our products outside the United States could negatively impact our business prospects and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Because we may not Generate Revenuesbe able to obtain or maintain the necessary regulatory approvals for some of our products, we may not generate revenues in the Amounts We Expect,amounts we expect, or in the Amounts Necessaryamounts necessary to Continuecontinue our business. Our Business.  Our Existing Productsexisting products as well as Our Manufacturing Facility Must Meet Quality Standardsour manufacturing facility must meet quality standards and are Subjectsubject to Inspectioninspection by a Numbernumber of Domestic Regulatorydomestic regulatory and Other Governmentalother governmental and Non-Governmental Agencies.non‑governmental agencies.


All of our proposed and existing products are subject to regulation in the U.S. by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or FDA, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and/or other domestic and international governmental, public health agencies, regulatory bodies or non-governmentalnon‑governmental organizations. In particular, we are subject to strict governmental controls on the development, manufacture, labeling, distribution and marketing of our products. The process of obtaining required approvals or clearances varies according to the nature of, and uses for, a specific product. These processes can involve lengthy and detailed laboratory testing, human or animal clinical trials, sampling activities, and other costly, time-consumingtime‑consuming procedures. The submission of an application to a regulatory authority does not guarantee that the authority will grant an approval or clearance for that product. Each authority may impose its own requirements and can delay or refuse to grant approval or clearance, even though a product has been approved in another country.


The time taken to obtain approval or clearance varies depending on the nature of the application and may result in the passage of a significant period of time from the date of submission of the application. As an example, the time required to obtain an EUA from the FDA for COVID‑19 tests has lengthened markedly over the past months due to, among other things, application volume. Delays in the approval or clearance processes increase the risk that we will not succeed in introducing or selling the subject products, and we may determine to devote our resources to different products.


Changes or developments in government regulations, policies or interpretations could increase our costs and could require us to undergo additional trials or procedures, or could make it impractical or impossible for us to market our products for certain uses, in certain markets, or at all. For example, on June 16, 2020, the FDA revoked the EUA it had granted for the DPP COVID‑19 IgM/IgG System based in part on performance criteria identified after the EUA was granted on April 14, 2020. We do not currently have an EUA from the FDA for any of the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems, and we do not currently have an application pending for any such EUA Moreover, FDA regulations, policies and procedures with respect to COVID‑19 tests may be significantly impacted by the continued development of vaccines for COVID‑19 and changes in the FDA’s prioritization guidance.


Changes in government regulations may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations because we may have to incur additional expenses if we are required to change or implement new testing, manufacturing and control procedures. If we are required to devote resources to develop such new procedures, we may not have sufficient resources to devote to research and development, marketing, or other activities that are critical to our business. We are, for example, expending resources to modify the design of the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test System to achieve performance targets consistent with the FDA’s performance criteria issued subsequent to the granting of our original EUA.


We can manufacture and sell our products only if we comply with regulations and quality standards established by government agencies such as the FDA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture as well as by non-governmentalnon‑governmental organizations such as the ISO and WHO. We have implemented a quality control system that is intended to comply with applicable regulations. Although FDA approval is not required for the export of our products, there are export regulations promulgated by the FDA that specifically relate to the export of our products that require compliance with FDA QSRs and that also require meeting certain documentary requirements regarding the approval of the product in export markets. We also may be subject to import regulations in connection with international sourcing of components and materials incorporated in the manufacturing of our products.

If Wewe do not Complycomply with FDA or Other Regulatory Requirements, Weother regulatory requirements, we may be Requiredrequired to Suspend Productionsuspend production or Salesale of Our Productsour products or Instituteinstitute a Recall,recall, which could Resultresult in Higher Costshigher costs and a Lossloss of Revenues.revenues.


Regulations of the FDA and other federal, state and foreign regulatory agencies have significant effects on many aspects of our operations, and the operations of our suppliers and distributors, including packaging, labeling, manufacturing, adverse event reporting, recalls, distribution, storage, advertising, promotion and record keeping. We are subject to routine inspection by the FDA and other agencies to determine compliance with QSRs and FDA regulatory requirements in the United States and other applicable regulations worldwide, including but not limited to ISO standards. We believe that our facilities and procedures are in material compliance with the FDA requirements and ISO standards, but the regulations may be unclear and are subject to change, and we cannot be sure that the FDA or other regulators will agree with our compliance with these requirements. The FDA and foreign regulatory agencies may require post-marketingpost‑marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the performance of approved or cleared products or impose conditions on any product clearances or approvals that could restrict the distribution or commercial applications of those products. Regulatory agencies may impose restrictions on our or our distributors’ advertising and promotional activities or preclude these activities altogether if a noncompliance is believed to exist. In addition, the subsequent discovery of previously unknown problems with a product may result in restrictions on the product or additional regulatory actions, including withdrawal of the product from the market.


Our inability to comply with the applicable requirements of the FDA can result in, among other things, 483 notices, warning letters, administrative or judicially imposed sanctions such as injunctions, recall or seizure of products, civil penalties, withdrawal of product registrations, total or partial suspension of production, refusal to grant premarket clearance for devices, a determination that a device is not approvable, marketing clearances or approvals, or criminal prosecution. For example, in February 2020, we received a “not approvable” letter from the U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationFDA with respect to our premarket approval submission on our DPP HIV-SyphilisHIV‑Syphilis multiplex test for commercial use in the United States.States and in June 2020 we received notice from the FDA that the EUA for the DPP COVID‑19 IgM/IgG System had been revoked. The ability of our suppliers to supply critical components or materials and of our distributors to sell our products could also be adversely affected if their operations are determined to be out of compliance. Such actions by the FDA and other regulatory bodies could adversely affect our revenues, costs and results of operations.


We must frequently make judgment decisions with respect to compliance with applicable laws and regulations. If regulators subsequently disagree with how we have sought to comply with these regulations, we could be subjected to substantial civil and criminal penalties, as well as product recall, seizure or injunction with respect to the sale of our products. Our reputation could be substantially impaired if we are assessed any civil and criminal penalties and limit our ability to manufacture and market our products which could have a material adverse effect on our business.


Our Inabilityinability to Respondrespond to Changeschanges in Regulatory Requirementsregulatory requirements could Adversely Affect Our Business.adversely affect our business.


We believe that our existing products and procedures are in material compliance with all applicable FDA regulations, ISO requirements, and other applicable regulatory requirements, but the regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of our products, the QSR and ISO requirements, and other requirements may be unclear and are subject to change. Newly promulgated regulations could require changes to our products, necessitate additional clinical trials or procedures, or make it impractical or impossible for us to market our products for certain uses, in certain markets, or at all. The FDA and other regulatory authorities also have the ability to change the requirements for obtaining product approval and/or impose new or additional requirements as part of the approval process. These changes or new or additional requirements may occur after the completion of substantial clinical work and other costly development activities. The implementation of such changes or new or additional requirements may result in additional clinical trials and substantial additional costs and could delay or make it more difficult or complicated to obtain approvals and sell our products. In addition, the FDA may revoke an Emergency Use Authorization under which our products are sold, where it is determined that the underlying health emergency no longer exists or warrants such authorization. Such revocation would preclude the sale of our affected products unless and until a further regulatory approval or authorization is obtained. For example, For example, on June 16, 2020, the FDA revoked the EUA it had granted for the DPP COVID‑19 IgM/IgG System based in part on performance criteria identified after the Emergency Use Authorization was granted on April 14, 2020, and since that time we expended resources to design the new COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems, including the DPP Respiratory Antigen Panel. We do not currently have an EUA from the FDA for any of the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems, and we do not currently have an application pending for any such EUA  We cannot anticipate or predict the effect, if any, that these types of changes might have on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Demand for Our Productsour products may be Affectedaffected by FDA Regulationregulation of Laboratory-Developed Testslaboratory‑developed tests and Genetic Testing.genetic testing.


Regulatory responsibility over instruments, test kits, reagents and other devices used to perform diagnostic testing by clinical laboratories is covered by the FDA.FDA, including our Micro Reader analyzer. The FDA has previously taken the position that it has regulatory authority over laboratory-developedlaboratory‑developed tests, or LDTs, but has exercised enforcement discretion by not regulating most LDTs performed by high complexity CLIA-certifiedCLIA‑certified laboratories. LDTs are tests designed, developed, and performed in-housein‑house by a laboratory. These laboratories are subject to CLIA regulation but such laboratories have previously not been subject to regulation by the FDA under the agency’s medical device requirements.


However, the FDA has announced that it would begin regulating LDTs, and in October 2014 the FDA issued proposed guidance on the regulation of LDTs for public comment. But, on November 18, 2016, the FDA announced that it would not finalize the proposed guidance prior to the end of the Obama administration. On January 13, 2017, the FDA released a discussion paper synthesizing public comments on the 2014 draft guidance documents and outlining a possible approach to regulation of LDTs. The discussion paper has no legal status and does not represent a final version of the LDT draft guidance documents. We cannot predict what policies the Trump administration will adopt with respect to LDTs. If the FDA increases regulation of LDTs, it could make it more difficult for laboratories and other customers to continue offering LDTs that involve genetic or molecular testing. This, in turn, could reduce demand for our products and adversely impact our revenues.


Disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies caused by funding shortages or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire, retain or deploy key leadership and other personnel, or otherwise prevent new or modified products from being developed, cleared, approved, authorized, or commercialized in a timely manner or at all, which could negatively impact our business.

The ability of the FDA to review and clear, approve, or authorize new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, statutory, regulatory, and policy changes, the FDA’s ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA’s ability to perform routine functions. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for medical devices or modifications to be cleared or approved, medical devices to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years, including for 35 days beginning on December 22, 2018, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to furlough critical FDA employees and stop critical activities.

Separately, in response to the global COVID‑19 pandemic, on March 10, 2020 the FDA announced its intention to postpone most foreign inspections of manufacturing facilities and products, and subsequently, on March 18, 2020, the FDA announced its intention to temporarily postpone routine surveillance inspections of domestic manufacturing facilities. Regulatory authorities outside the United States may adopt similar restrictions or other policy measures in response to the COVID‑19 pandemic. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns continue to prevent the FDA or other regulatory authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other regulatory authorities to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

In Additionaddition to FDA Requirements, We Are Subjectrequirements, we are subject to Several Government Regulations, Complianceseveral government regulations, compliance with which could Increase Our Costsincrease our costs and Affect Our Operations.affect our operations.


In addition to the FDA regulations previously described, laws and regulations in some states may restrict our ability to sell products in those states.


We must comply with numerous laws related to safe working conditions, environmental protection, disposal of hazardous substances, fire hazard control, manufacturing practices and labor or employment practices. Compliance with these laws or any new or changed laws regulating our business could result in substantial costs. Due to the number of laws and regulations governing our industry, and the actions of a number of government agencies that could affect our operations, it is impossible to reliably predict the full nature and impact of these laws and regulations. To the extent the costs and procedures associated with complying with these laws and requirements are substantial or it is determined that we do not comply, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.


Ongoing changes in healthcare regulation could negatively affect our revenues, business and financial condition.

There have been several proposed changes in the United States at the federal and state level for comprehensive reforms regarding the payment for, the availability of and reimbursement for healthcare services. These proposals have ranged from fundamentally changing federal and state healthcare reimbursement programs, including providing comprehensive healthcare coverage to the public under government‑funded programs, to minor modifications to existing programs. One example is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care or the Affordable Care Act, the Federal healthcare reform law enacted in 2010.

Healthcare reform initiatives will continue to be proposed, and may reduce healthcare related funding in an effort. It is impossible to predict the ultimate content and timing of any healthcare reform legislation and its resulting impact on us. If significant reforms are made to the healthcare system in the United States, or in other jurisdictions, those reforms may increase our costs or otherwise negatively effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

In April 2017, the European Parliament passed the Medical Devices Regulation (Regulation 2017/745), which repeals and replaces the European Union Medical Devices Directive and the Active Implantable Medical Devices Directive. Unlike directives, which must be implemented into the national laws of the European Economic Area, which we refer to as the EEA, member States, the regulations would be directly applicable, i.e., without the need for adoption of EEA member State laws implementing them, in all EEA member States and are intended to eliminate current differences in the regulation of medical devices among EEA member States. The Medical Devices Regulation, among other things, is intended to establish a uniform, transparent, predictable and sustainable regulatory framework across the EEA for medical devices and ensure a high level of safety and health while supporting innovation. The Medical Devices Regulation will, however, only become fully applicable three years after publication (in May 2020). Once applicable, the Medical Devices Regulation will, among other things:

strengthen the rules on placing devices on the market and reinforce surveillance once they are available;
establish explicit provisions on manufacturers’ responsibilities for the follow‑up of the quality, performance and safety of devices placed on the market;
improve the traceability of medical devices throughout the supply chain to the end‑user or patient through a unique identification number;
set up a central database to provide patients, healthcare professionals and the public with comprehensive information on products available in the EU; and
strengthen rules for the assessment of certain high‑risk devices, such as implants, which may have to undergo an additional check by experts before they are placed on the market.

Once applicable, the Medical Devices Regulation may impose increased compliance obligations for us to access the EU market.

We may Incur Additional Costsincur additional costs if Wewe do not Complycomply with Privacy, Securityprivacy, security and Breach Notification Regulations.breach notification regulations.


We believe that we are not a covered entity nor a business associate of a covered entity and are not responsible for complying with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA. Even though we likely are not a covered entity under HIPAA, we do have in place administrative, technical and physical safeguards to protect the privacy and security of consumers’ personal information.] We are required to comply with varying state privacy, security and breach reporting laws. If we fail to comply with existing or new laws and regulations related to properly transferring data containing consumers’ personal information, we could be subject to monetary fines, civil penalties or criminal sanctions. Also, there are other federal and state laws that protect the privacy and security of consumers’ personal information, and we may be subject to enforcement by various governmental authorities and courts resulting in complex compliance issues. We could incur damages under state laws pursuant to an action brought by a private party for the wrongful use or disclosure of consumers’ personal information.


Failure to Comply With Recentcomply with recent European Data Protection Requirementsdata protection requirements could Increase Our Costs.increase our costs.


The EU has adopted a comprehensive overhaul of its data protection regime from the prior national legislative approach to a single European Economic Area Privacy Regulation called the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, which came into effect on May 25, 2018. The new EU data protection regime extends the scope of the EU data protection law to all foreign companies processing data of EU residents. It imposes a strict data protection compliance regime with severe penalties of up to the greater of 4% of worldwide turnover and €20 million and includes new rights such as the “portability” of personal data. Although the GDPR will apply across the EU without a need for local implementing legislation, as had been the case under the prior data protection regime, local data protection authorities will still have the ability to interpret the GDPR, which has the potential to create inconsistencies on a country-by-countrycountry‑by‑country basis. We are evaluating these new requirements and implementing a plan to ensure compliance. Complying with the enhanced obligations imposed by the GDPR may result in significant costs to our business and require us to amend certain of our business practices. Further, we have no assurances that violations will not occur, particularly given the complexity of the GDPR, as well as the uncertainties that accompany new, comprehensive legislation.


If Wewe are not Ableable to Manufacture Productsmanufacture products in Accordanceaccordance with Applicable Requirements, Itapplicable requirements, it could Adversely Affect Our Business.adversely affect our business.


Our products must meet detailed specifications, performance standards and quality requirements. As a result, our products and the materials used in their manufacture or assembly undergo regular inspections and quality testing. Factors such as defective materials or processes, mechanical failures, human errors, environmental conditions, changes in materials or production methods, and other events or conditions could cause our products or the materials used to produce or assemble our products to fail inspections and quality testing or otherwise not perform in accordance with our label claims or the expectations of our customers.


If we are not able to meet the applicable specifications, performance standards, quality requirements or customer expectations could adversely affect our ability to manufacture and sell our products or comply with regulatory requirements. These events could, in turn, adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.


Healthcare Fraudfraud and Abuse Laws Could Adversely Affect Our Businessabuse laws could adversely affect our business and Resultsresults of Operations.operations.


There are various federal and state laws targeting fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry to which we are subject, including anti-kickbackanti‑kickback laws, laws constraining the sales, false claims laws, marketing and promotion of medical devices by limiting the kinds of financial arrangements that manufacturers of these products may enter into with physicians, hospitals, laboratories and other potential purchasers of medical devices. There are other laws we are subject to that require us to report certain transactions between it and healthcare professionals. Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal or civil sanctions, including substantial fines, imprisonment and exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs. Many of the existing requirements are new and have not been definitively interpreted by state authorities or courts, and available guidance is limited. We could face enforcement action and fines and other penalties, and could receive adverse publicity, unless and until we are in full compliance with these laws, all of which could materially harm us. Furthermore, changes in or evolving interpretations of these laws, regulations, or administrative or judicial interpretations, may require us to change our business practices or subject our business practices to legal challenges, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our Compliancecompliance with Regulations Governing Public Companiesregulations governing public companies is Complexcomplex and Expensive.expensive.


Public companies are subject to various laws and regulations, which have increased the scope, complexity and cost of corporate governance, reporting and disclosure practices. For example, we are subject to the Sarbanes-OxleySarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002, The Dodd-FrankDodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the requirements of The NASDAQ Global Market. The implementation of certain aspects of these laws and regulations has required and will continue to require substantial management time and oversight and may require us to incur significant additional accounting and legal costs. We continually review changes with respect to new and proposed rules and cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs, and the timing of such costs, we may incur. There are several interpretations of these laws and regulations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and as a result, their application in practice may change as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs. We are committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure, but if we fail to comply with any of these requirements, legal proceedings may be initiated against us, which may adversely affect our business.


If we expand our international presence, it may increase our risks and expose our business to regulatory, cultural or other challenges.

We will continue to try to increase revenue derived from international sales of our products. There are several of factors that could adversely affect the performance of our business and/or cause us to incur substantially increased costs because of our international presence and sales, including: (i) uncertainty in the application of foreign laws and the interpretation of contracts with foreign parties; (ii) cultural and political differences that favor local competitors or make it difficult to effectively market, sell and gain acceptance of our products; (iii) exchange rates, currency fluctuations, tariffs and other barriers, extended payment terms and dependence on international distributors or representatives; (iv) trade protection measures, trade sanctions and import/export licensing requirements; (v) our inability to obtain or maintain regulatory approvals or registrations for our products; (vi) Economic conditions, political instability, the absence of available funding sources, terrorism, civil unrest, war and natural disasters in foreign countries; (vii) Reduced protection for, or enforcement of, our patents and other intellectual property rights in foreign countries; (viii) our inability to identify international distributors and negotiate acceptable terms for distribution agreements; and (ix) restrictions on our ability to repatriate investments and earnings from foreign operations.

Economic, cultural and political conditions and foreign regulatory requirements may slow or prevent the manufacture of our products in countries other than the United States. Interruption of the supply of our products could reduce revenues or cause us to incur significant additional expenses in finding an alternative source of supply. Foreign currency fluctuations and economic conditions in foreign countries could also increase the costs of manufacturing our products in foreign countries.

Risks Related to OurOwnership of Common Stock


Our Common Stock has Limited Liquidity,limited liquidity, and Investorsinvestors may not be Ableable to Sellsell as Much Stockmuch stock as They Wantthey want at Prevailing Market Pricesprevailing market prices or at all.


The liquidity of our Common Stock depends on several factors, including but not limited to our financial results and overall market conditions, so it is not possible to predict whether this level of liquidity will continue, be sustained, or decrease. Decreased trading volume in our stock would make it more difficult for investors to sell their shares in the public market at any given time at prevailing prices. Our management and larger stockholders exercise significant control over our company.


The Priceprice of Ourour Common Stock could Continuecontinue to be Volatile.volatile.


The price of our Common Stock has been volatile, subject to rapid and substantial decreases in stock price, and may be volatile in the future. By way of example, on February 10, 2021, the price of our Common Stock closed at $7.92 per share while on February 17, 2021, our stock price closed at $6.94 per share with no discernable announcements or developments by us or third parties. On February 12, 2021, the intra‑day sales price of our Common Stock fluctuated between a reported low sale price of $6.96 and a reported high sales price of $7.45. The following factors, among others, could have a significant impact on the market for our Common Stock: (1) the performance of our business; (2) clinical results with respect to our products or those of our competitors; (3) the gain or loss of significant contracts and availability of funding for the purchase of our products; (4) actions undertaken by the Congress or the Presidential Administration; (5) changes in our relations with our key customers, distributors or suppliers; (6) developments in patent or other proprietary rights; (7) litigation or threatened litigation; (8) general market and economic conditions; (9) the relatively low trading volume for our Common Stock; (10) changes in competition; (11) Complaintscomplaints or concerns about the performance or safety of our products and publicity about those issues, including publicity expressed through social media or otherwise over the internet; (12) failure to achieve, or changes in, financial estimates by securities analysts and comments or opinions about us by securities analysts or major stockholders; (13) announcement of regulatory or enforcement actions by the FDA or other agencies against us, our products or our customers; (14) changes in our operating results; and (15) terrorist attacks, civil unrest, war and national disasters.disasters; and (16) other factors unrelated to our operating performance or prospects.


Overall, the stock market has experienced price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of our Common Stock, as well as the stock of many other similar companies. Such price fluctuations are generally unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies whose stock is affected.


After the volatility in the market price of a company’s stock, class action litigation has occurred against the issuing company. If we were subject to this type of litigation in the future, we could incur substantial costs and the attention and resources of our management could be diverted, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and earnings. Any adverse determination in this type of litigation could also subject us to significant liabilities.


Any Future Issuances of Shares of Our Common Stock may become the target of a “short squeeze.”

In the past several weeks prior to the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K, securities of certain companies have increasingly experienced significant and extreme volatility in stock price due to short sellers of shares of common stock, known as a “short squeeze.” Short squeezes have caused extreme volatility in those companies and in the market and have led to the price per share of those companies to trade at a significantly inflated rate that is disconnected from the underlying value of the company. Sharp rises in a company’s stock price may force traders in a short position to buy the stock to avoid even greater losses. Many investors who have purchased shares in those companies at an inflated rate face the risk of losing a significant portion of their original investment as the price per share has declined steadily as interest in those stocks have abated. There can be no assurance that we will not, in the future be, a target of a short squeeze, and you may lose a significant portion or all of your investment if you purchase our shares at a rate that is significantly disconnected from our underlying value.

Any future issuances of shares of our Common Stock by Us Could Harmus could harm the Priceprice of Ourour Common Stock and Our Abilityour ability to Raise Fundsraise funds in New Equity Offerings.new equity offerings.


Any future sales of a substantial number of our shares of Common Stock or other equity-relatedequity‑related securities, or the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the price of our Common Stock, and could impair our ability to raise capital through future offerings of equity or equity-relatedequity‑related securities.

Our Management and Larger Stockholders Exercise Significant Control Over Us.

As of December 31, 2019, 25.5% of our outstanding common stock was beneficially owned by our executive officers, directors and 5% stockholders including three large investors that beneficially own 21%, of our outstanding common stock. For the foreseeable future, and assuming these ownership percentages continue to apply, to the extent that these parties vote similarly, they may be able to exercise significant control over many matters requiring approval by the board of directors or our stockholders.  As a result, they may be able to:

control the composition of our board of directors;
control our management and policies;
determine the outcome of significant corporate transactions, including changes in control that may be beneficial to stockholders; and,
act in each of their own interests, which may conflict with or differ from the interests of each other or the interests of the other stockholders.


Sales of Ourour Common Stock by Existing Stockholders, Executive Officersexisting stockholders, executive officers or Directorsdirectors could Depressdepress the Market Pricemarket price of Ourour Common Stock.


If our existing stockholders, officers or directors sell our Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales may occur, it could negatively affect the price of our Common Stock. We are unable to estimate the number of shares of our Common Stock that may actually be resold in the public market since this will depend on the market price for our Common Stock, the individual circumstances of the sellers and other factors.


Institutional stockholders own significant amounts of our Common Stock. If one or more of these stockholders sell large portions of their holdings in a relatively short time, the prevailing price of our Common Stock could be negatively affected. In addition, it is possible that one or more of our executive officers or non-employeenon‑employee members of our Board of Directors could sell shares of our Common Stock during an open trading window. These transactions and the perceived reasons for these transactions could have a negative effect on the prevailing market price of our Common Stock.


We do not Intendintend to Pay Cash Dividendspay cash dividends on Ourour Common Stock.


We do not expect to pay any cash dividends on our Common Stock and currently intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the expansion of our business. Therefore, the success of an investment in our Common Stock will depend entirely upon any future increase in value of our Common Stock. There is no guarantee that our Common Stock will gain value or even maintain the price at which investors purchased their shares.


General Risk Factors

We may not generate the expected benefits of future acquisitions or investments, and they could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management, increase our expenses and negatively affect our business.

As a way for us to grow our business, we may pursue strategic acquisitions or investments. These activities, and their impact on our business, are subject to many risks, including the following: (i) the benefits expected to be derived from an acquisition or investment may not materialize and could be affected by numerous factors, such as regulatory developments, insurance reimbursement, our inexperience with new businesses or markets, general economic conditions and increased competition; (ii) we may be unable to successfully integrate an acquired company’s personnel, assets, management, information technology systems, accounting policies and practices, products and/or technology into our business; (iii) we may not be able to accurately forecast the performance or ultimate impact of an acquired business; and (iv) an acquisition may result in the incurrence of unexpected expenses, stockholder lawsuits, the dilution of our earnings or our existing stockholders’ percentage ownership, or potential losses from undiscovered liabilities not covered by an indemnification from the seller(s) of the acquired business.

If these factors occur, we may be unable to achieve all or a significant part of the benefits expected from an acquisition or investment. This may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and ability to grow our business or otherwise achieve our financial and strategic objectives.

Developments related to the U.K.’s referendum on membership in the E.U. could adversely affect us.

On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom voted in favor of leaving the European Union, or E.U. On January 24, 2020, the U.K. and the E.U. entered into a withdrawal agreement pursuant to which the U.K. formally left the E.U. on January 31, 2020,In December 2020, the U.K. and E.U. agreed on a trade and cooperation that will provisionally apply after the end of the transition period until it is ratified by the parties to the agreement. On December 31, 2020, the U.K. passed legislation giving effect to the trade and cooperation agreement. The E.U. is expected to formally adopt the agreement in early 2021. The trade and cooperation agreement covers the general objectives and framework of the relationship between the U.K. and the E.U., including as it relates to trade, transport, visas, judicial, law enforcement and security matters. Notably, under the trade and cooperation agreement, U.K. goods no longer benefit from the free movement of goods, and there is no longer the free movement of people between the U.K. and the E.U.

Such a withdrawal from the E.U. is unprecedented, and it is unclear how the changes to U.K.’s access to the European single market for goods, capital, services and labor within the E.U., or the European single market, and the wider commercial, legal and regulatory environment, will impact our U.K. operations. We may also face new regulatory costs and challenges that could have an adverse effect on our operations and development programs. For example, because the regulatory framework for pharmaceutical products in the U.K. covering quality, safety and efficacy of pharmaceutical products, clinical studies, marketing authorization, commercial sales and distribution of pharmaceutical products is derived from E.U. directives and regulations, Brexit could materially impact the future regulatory regime that applies to products and the approval of product candidates in the U.K. Any delay in obtaining, or an inability to obtain, any marketing approvals, as a result of Brexit or otherwise, may force us to restrict or delay efforts to seek regulatory approval in the U.K. and/or E.U. for our product or gene therapy product candidate, which could significantly harm our business.

Given the lack of comparable precedent, it is unclear what financial, trade and legal implications the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the E.U. will have and how such withdrawal may affect us.

Legislative and other regulatory changes could have an effect on our business.

Changes in regulatory or economic conditions or in the laws and policies governing foreign trade, taxes, manufacturing, and development in the United States could impact our business. Economic and regulatory changes could also affect foreign currency exchange rates which, in turn, could affect our reported financial results and our competitiveness on a worldwide basis.

Our business may be negatively affected by terrorist attacks or natural disasters.

Terrorist attacks or natural disasters could cause economic instability. These events could negatively affect economic conditions both within and outside the United States and harm demand for our products. The operations of our customers and suppliers could be negatively impacted and eliminate, reduce or delay our customers’ ability to purchase and use our products and our suppliers’ ability to provide raw materials and finished products.

Our facilities, including some pieces of manufacturing equipment and our computer systems, may be difficult to replace. Various types of disasters, including fires, earthquakes, floods and acts of terrorism, may affect our facilities and computer systems. In the event our existing facilities or computer systems are affected by man‑made or natural disasters, we may have difficulty operating our business and may be unable to manufacture products for sale or meet customer demands or sales projections. If our manufacturing operations were curtailed or shut down entirely, it would seriously harm our business.

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES


Our U.S. manufacturing, administrative offices, and research facilities are located in leased space in Medford, New York, pursuant to a lease covering approximately 39,650 square feet and expiring on June 30, 2021.


On February 5, 2019, we entered into a commercial real estate lease for new corporate headquarters comprised of 70,000 square feet of office, research and development, and warehouse space located in Hauppauge, New York. The lease has an initial term of eleven years that can be extended, at our option, for two additional terms of five years each. Rent under the lease, which is payable in monthly installments, totals approximately $900,000 for the initial year and then increases by approximately three percent each succeeding year.


On February 5, 2019, we also entered into an agreement to sublet the space at Holbrook, New York. The sublease has a term that (a) commenced on the date we vacate the premises and (b) terminate on April 29, 2020. The sublessee has paid us 50% of our rent and additional rent payments, which will total approximately $100,000 per year during the term of the sublease. The sublease ran conterminously with the base lease in Holbrook, for which the Company was primarily responsible until the end of the lease term in April 2020.


Our European headquarters and Center of Excellence for Optical Technology is located in leased office and manufacturing space in Berlin, Germany. Our Southeast Asia manufacturing, warehouse, and commercial facilities are located in leased space in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Our Latin America manufacturing, warehouse, and commercial facilities are located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. We regularly review our real estate portfolio and develop footprint strategies to support our customers’ global plans, while at the same time supporting our technical needs and controlling operating expenses.


ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


This information is set forth under “Note 12 – Commitments, Contingencies And Concentrations – Litigation” to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
From time to time we may become involved in legal proceedings or may be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently believe that the final outcome of these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

PART II


ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


Listing Information


Our stock is listed on the  NASDAQ Global Select Market of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC under the symbol “CEMI.”


Holders


As of March 1, 20202021, there were 132115 record owners of our Common Stock (including nominee holders such as banks and brokerage firms who hold shares for beneficial owners).


Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities


During the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, we issued unregistered securities in connection with the acquisition of Orangelife. See Note 23 - Acquisitions, for further discussion.


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the year ended December 31, 2019.2020.


41
39

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this report. In addition to historical information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involves risks, uncertainties and assumptions. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” at page 4 of this report. Please read “Item1A. Risk Factors” for a discussion of factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations.

The following discussion is presented in six sections:

Executive Overview
Consolidated Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Executive Overview

Through our wholly owned subsidiaries, Chembio Diagnostic Systems Inc., Chembio Diagnostics Malaysia Sdn Bhd, Chembio Diagnostics Germany, and Chembio Diagnostics Brazil weWe develop, manufacture and commercialize point-of-care diagnostic tests that are used to detect or diagnose diseases. All products that are currently being developed arefor the detection and diagnosis of infectious diseases, including COVID 19, sexually transmitted disease, and fever and tropical disease.

Our product portfolio is based onupon our patentedproprietary DPP technology, a novel point-of-care diagnostic platform that offers certain customer advantages as comparedprovides high-quality, cost-effective results in 15 to 20 minutes using fingertip blood, nasal swabs and other sample types. The DPP technology platform addresses the rapid diagnostic test market, which includes infectious diseases, cardiac markers, cholesterol and lipids, pregnancy and fertility, and drugs of abuse. Compared with traditional lateral flow technology. Chembio was formed in 1985.technology, the DPP technology platform can provide enhanced sensitivity and specificity, advanced multiplexing capabilities and, with the DPP Micro Reader, quantitative results.


Recent operational accomplishments and highlights include:

Achieved product sales of $28.8 millionWe target the market for full year 2019, an increase of 3.3% over prior year
Achieved total revenue of $34.5 million for full year 2019, a decrease of 0.3% over prior year
Acquired Orangelife Comercio e Industria Ltda., a privately-held Brazilian manufacturer of lateral flow testsrapid diagnostic test solutions for infectious diseases, to diversify and expand our market penetration in Brazil and support Bio-Manguinhos, a major customer.
Received WHO Prequalification approval forwhich is driven by the HIV Self-Test and our Malaysian production facility
Successfully completed the technical feasibility phase for a rare disease with Takeda Pharmaceutical.
Initiated production on our fully-automated DPP test manufacturing line and took delivery of our second and third automated lines for our other product platforms.

We strengthened our balance sheet by entering a credit agreement with Perceptive Credit Holdings II, LP. for a $20 million term loan. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

The Company’s product commercialization and product development efforts are focused on infectious disease testing and technology collaborations. In infectious disease, the Company is commercializing tests for HIV and Syphilis, Zika virus, and developing tests for malaria, dengue virus, chikungunya virus, ebola, lassa, Marburg, leptospirosis, Rickettsia typhi, Burkholderia pseudomallei, and Orientia tsutsugamushi, individually or as part of fever panel tests. Through technology collaborations, the Company is developing tests for concussion, bovine tuberculosis, a rare disease in collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical, and a biomarker development project in collaboration with AstraZeneca.

Large and growing markets have been established for these kinds of tests, initially in high prevalence regions where they are indispensable for large scale prevention and treatment programs. Our product development is focused on areas whereof infectious diseases globally, an increase in the availability of rapid point-of-care screening, diagnostic, or confirmatory results can improve health outcomes.  More generally, we believe there is and will continue to be ageriatric population, growing demand for rapid test results, and advancements in multiplexing. We have a broad portfolio of infectious disease products, which prior to 2020 were focused principally on sexually transmitted disease and fever and tropical disease. In February 2020 we began the process of shifting substantially all of our resources to leverage the DPP technology platform to address the acute and escalating need for diagnostic products that can provide accurate, actionable diagnostic information in a rapid, cost-effective manner at the point of care.testing for COVID-19.


Our products are sold globally, directly and through distributors, to medical laboratories and hospitals, governmental and public health entities, non-governmental organizations, medical professionals, and retail establishments, both domesticallyestablishments. We continue to seek to expand our commercial distribution channels.

In 2020 we continued to invest in automating our test manufacturing processes, all of which are now based in the United States. Among other actions, we expanded our manufacturing capabilities by validating and internationally, underimplementing automated lines. Our transition from manual to automated assembly is intended to add capacity, reduce variable costs and improve product margins. In order to address challenging economic conditions and implement our STAT-PAK, SURE CHECK, STAT-VIEW or DPP registered trademarks, or under the private labels ofbusiness strategy, we continued to execute a program to reduce operating expenses and better align our marketing partners.costs with revenues, including by eliminating positions that were no longer aligned with our strategy.

Consolidated Results of Operations


The results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 were as follows:


 Year Ended December 31, 
 Year Ended December 31,  (in thousands) 
 2019 2018  2020  2019 
                     
TOTAL REVENUES $34,464,032   100% $34,581,440   100% $32,470   100% $34,464   100%
                                
COSTS AND EXPENSES:                                
Cost of product sales  22,394,317   65%  22,599,432   65%  23,874   74%  22,394   65%
Research and development expenses  8,538,416   25%  8,526,256   26%  9,509   29%  8,538   25%
Selling, general and administrative expenses  16,138,424   47%  11,100,775   33%  21,038   65%  16,139   47%
Severance and related costs  1,122   3%     0%
Acquisition costs  721,465   2%  337,645   1%  63   0%  721   2%
  47,792,622   139%  42,564,108   25%  55,606   171%  47,792   139%
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (13,328,590)  (39)%  (7,982,668)  (23)%  (23,136)  (71)%  (13,328)  (39)%
                                
OTHER (LOSS)/INCOME  (846,831)  (2)%  49,498   0%
OTHER (EXPENSE) / INCOME  (2,842)  (9)%  (847)  (2)%
                                
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES  (14,175,421)  (41)%  (7,933,170)  (23)%
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT  (25,978)  (80)%  (14,175)  (41)%
                                
Income tax benefit  (500,292)  (2)%  (67,521)  0%  457   1%  500   1%
NET LOSS $(13,675,129)  (39)% $(7,865,649)  (23)% $(25,521)  (79)% $(13,675)  (40)%


Percentages in the table reflect the percent of total revenues.


Total Revenues


Total revenues during the year ended December 31, 20192020 were $34.5$32.5 million, a decrease of $0.1$2.0 million, or 0.3%5.8%, compared to 2018.2019. The decrease in total revenues was comprised of the following:

$0.9reflected a $4.1 million, or 3.3% increase14%, decrease in net product sales, reflecting gainswhich was principally comprised of (a) lower sales in U.S., Europe,Africa, Latin America, and Latin America,the United States associated with diminished funding and the closure of clinics for HIV testing due to the COVID-19 pandemic, offset in part by lower sales(b) The Company’s success in Africaachieving regulatory approvals for and Asia. U.S. sales benefited from our winning back a large public health program andselling the COVID-19 IgM/IgG Systems in Latin America benefited from initialand gains in Europe associated with our long term agreement with UNICEF for our DPP Zika IgM/IgG and DPP ZCD IgM/IgG multiplex tests and Micro Readers. The decrease in net product sales of Zika, Chikungunya, and Dengue Fever tests, both standalone andwas offset in the multiplex version. Europe includes contribution from our acquisition of Chembio Diagnostics GmbH in November 2018. Asia and Africa declines were affectedpart by the timing of national tenders.
$1.0a $2.2 million, or 15.7% decrease31.9%, increase in R&Dresearch and development and grant and license and royalty revenues compared to 2018, relating to new government grants for the timingdevelopment, and cadencesubmission for U.S. regulatory approval, of customer program schedulesDPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen and their related performance obligations.
DPP Respiratory Panel test systems.


Gross Product Margin


Cost of product sales is primarily comprised of material, labor, manufacturing overhead, depreciation and amortization, and other operating expenses.freight and distribution costs. Gross product margin is net product sales less cost of product sales, and gross product margin percentage is gross product margin as a percentage of net product sales.


Gross product margin increaseddecreased by $1.1$5.6 million, or 21.4%86.2% compared to 2018.2019. The following schedule calculates gross product margin:


 For the years ended December 31  
Favorable/
(unfavorable)
   % Change   For the years ended December 31  Favorable/    
 2019 2018 2020  2019  (unfavorable)  % Change 
 (in thousands)      (in thousands)       
Net product sales $28,845  $27,913  $932   3.3% $24,767  $28,845  $(4,078)  (14.1)%
Less: Cost of product sales  (22,394)  (22,599)  205
  (0.9%)  (23,874)  (22,394)  (1,480)  6.6%
Gross product margin $6,451  $5,314  $1,137   21.4% $893  $6,451  $(5,558)  (86.2)%
Gross product margin %  22.4%  19.0%          3.6%  22.4%        


In 2020 we invested in developing and offering products to address the COVID-19 pandemic, which we expect will have average selling prices greater than those of our legacy products. We also continued to invest in automation in order to reduce our reliance on manual labor and improve our product margins (see Q1’21 Restructuring Charge). The $1.1$5.6 million increasedecrease in gross product margin was comprised of the following:

$0.2(a) $4.7 million from favorableunfavorable product margins and (b) $0.9 million from unfavorable product sales volume as described above, andunder “—Total Revenues” above. The $4.6 million decrease from unfavorable product margins principally reflected the following:

We incurred the cost of product sales for COVID-19 IgM/IgG Systems that were returned by customers following the Revocation.
The Revocation precluded planned sales of COVID-19 IgM/IgG Systems to customers in the United States in the last three quarters of 2020 and resulted in the deferral ,of certain customer opportunities for sales of COVID-19 IgM/IgG Systems outside the United States, which negatively impacted our sales mix as we experienced (a) significantly lower sales in the United States, where we have our highest average selling prices, and (b) outside the United States, a higher mix of sales in geographic regions with lower average selling prices.
We experienced operational inefficiencies, including those triggered by the Revocation and activities related to qualifying automated lines for production of certain products, which resulted in increased cost of product sales as we substantially shifted our production from COVID-19 products back to legacy products.

$0.9 million from favorable product margins, related to the impact of geographic mix on average selling price, initial benefits from our first automated assembly line, and reduced contract labor costs.41

Research and Development


This category includes costs incurred for clinical and regulatory affairs and other research and development, as follows:


 For the years ended December 31  
Favorable/
(unfavorable)
  % Change   For the years ended December 31  Favorable/    
 2019 2018 2020  2019  (unfavorable)  % Change 
 (in thousands)      (in thousands)       
Clinical and regulatory affairs $1,516  $1,307  $(209)  (16.0)% $1,061  $1,516  $455   30.0%
Other research and development  7,022   7,219   197   2.7%  8,448   7,022   (1,426)  (20.3)%
Total research and development $8,538  $8,526  $(12)  (0.1)% $9,509  $8,538  $(971)  (11.4)%


The increasedecrease in clinical &and regulatory affairs costs for 2019 2020 as compared to 2018 is2019 was primarily associated with new product negotiations in new countries and around the world andreduced clinical trial costs.costs following the FDA’s granting of premarket approval for the DPP HIV-Syphilis test during 2020, offset in part by expenditures related to the DPP SARS-CoV-2 Systems. The decreaseincrease in other research and development costs is correlateswas primarily related to costs associated with the reduction in R&D revenue noted above.development of the DPP SARS-CoV-2 Systems.


Selling, General and Administrative Expense


Selling, general and administrative expense includesexpenses include administrative expenses, sales and marketing costs including commissions,(including commissions), and other corporate items. The $5.0$4.9 million, or 45.4%30%, increase in selling, general and administrative expenses for 2020 as compared to 2019  primarily reflected legal costs arising subsequent to the Revocation, costs from expanding our U.S. commercial organization, a full year of our Brazilian facility (which was acquired during the fourth quarter of 2019), and facility costs related to the COVID-19 pandemic, offset in part by cost savings from retrenching our Malaysia facility and other restructuring actions taken during the first quarter of 2020.

Severance, Restructuring and other related costs

During the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018 includes $0.9 million costs from Chembio Diagnostics Germany, $1.1 million higher non-cash equity compensation costs, and2020, the Company recognized $0.7 million of rent and other costsin net severance expenses related to leasing ourthe departure of Chembio’s former chief executive officer and the elimination of certain positions as part of its multi-faceted expense reduction program to reduce operating expenses. The Company undertook actions to adjust the size and composition of the organization, including by removing positions that were non-essential in light of its new facility in Hauppauge, NY,business strategy, and to remove other expenses, all of which the Company expects will provide savings throughout, and after, 2020.

In light of market dynamics, the Company retrenched its Malaysian operations, including the termination of employment of its Malaysian workforce. The Company will maintain its Malaysian subsidiary and sustain the product registrations that were partially non-cash in 2019 dueobtained throughout southeast Asia, with the benefit of having that entity and the WHO prequalification certified facility.

Based on these activities, the Company took restructuring actions totaling $0.4 million to the lease terms.realign and resize its production capacity and cost structure. All expenses have been paid as of December 31, 2020.


Acquisition Costs


Acquisition costs include legal, due diligence, audit, and related costs associated with acquisitions. The $0.4$0.7 million increasedecrease in acquisition costs for the year ended December 31, 2019 2020 as compared to 2018 is associated with spending related to acquisitions. During 2019 these included an audit required for Chembio Diagnostics Germany, as well as diligence and legal costs related toreflected the acquisition of Chembio Dignostics Brazilfact that we completed acquisitions in November 2019.2019 but not 2020.


Other (Expense) / Income and Expense


Other (expense) / income  and expenses arewas principally comprised of interest income earned on our deposits,expense net of interest income. Interest expense which increased by approximately $0.9$2.0 million for 20192020 as compared to 20182019, due to the interest paid on the term loan debt the company entered intowe incurred in September 2019.


Income Tax ProvisionBenefit


For 20192020 we recognized a tax benefit of $0.6$0.4 million primarily attributable to the loss generated by Chembio Diagnostics Malaysia.Germany. As of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


During 2019,the year ended December 31, 2020, we funded our business operations, including capital expenditures and working capital requirements, principally from a public offering of common stock, which generated proceeds of $28.4 million (net of expenses), and from cash and cash equivalents. Our operations used $9.1$18.9 million of cash. As of December 31, 2019,2020, we had outstanding debt (excluding leases) in the amountindebtedness of $20.2$20 million (carrying amount of $17.7$18.2 million), consisting of loans of $20.0 million pursuant to the Credit Agreement described under a credit agreement entered into on September 3, 2019 (see “—Sources of Funds—Credit Agreement” below) and $0.2 million under a seller-financed note payable incurred in connection with our purchase of automated manufacturing equipment.below.


We continually evaluate our liquidity requirements, capital needs and availability of capital resources based on our operating needs and our planned growth initiatives.initiatives, particularly in the light of our shift in business focus to the DPP SARS-CoV-2 Systems. We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next twelve months.

Our future working capital needs will depend on many factors, includingincluding: the fact and timing of our receipt from the FDA of an EUA award for the DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen System and/or the DPP Respiratory Panel System; the fact and timing of our receipt from the FDA of a CLIA waiver for the DPP HIV-Syphilis System; the rate of our business and revenue growth, including our ability to successfully build distribution channels and commercialize the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems in geographies (principally Europe) covered by our CE-Marks for those products, particularly if we are able to resume commercialization of the COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Systems in the United States; the occurrence and timing of regulatory approvals for other new products; the timing of our continuing automation of U.S. manufacturing,manufacturing; and the timing of our investment in our research and development as well as sales and marketing. If however, thoseour sources of liquidity become insufficient to fund the growth of our business, we may need to reduce the level or slow the timing of itsour growth plans, which would likely curtail or delay the growth in our business contemplated by our operating plan and could impair or defer our ability to achieve profitability and generate cash flow, or to seek to raise additional funds through debt or equity financings, strategic relationships, or other arrangements, to the extent funding would be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we were to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible securities, the issuance could result in substantial dilution to existing stockholders, and the holders of thesethose new securities or debt may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of the holders of common stock.


Sources of Funds


Credit Agreement. On September 3, 2019, we, as borrower, and certain of our subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into a Credit Agreement and Guaranty, or the Credit Agreement, with Perceptive Credit Holdings II, LP, or the Lender.


Principal Amount. The Credit Agreement provides for a $20,000,000 senior secured term loan credit facility, which was drawn in full on September 4, 2019. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, we may use the proceeds for general working capital purposes and other permitted corporate purposes, to refinance certain of our existing indebtedness and to pay fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Credit Agreement.
• Principal Amount. The Credit Agreement provides for a $20,000,000 senior secured term loan credit facility, which was drawn in full on September 4, 2019. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, we may use the proceeds (i) for general working capital purposes and other permitted corporate purposes, (ii) to refinance certain of our existing indebtedness and (iii) to pay fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Credit Agreement, including the Lender’s closing cost amount of $550,000, which was netted from the proceeds, and a financing fee of $600,000 (3.0% of gross proceeds) payable to Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, our financial advisor for the financing.
Interest Rate. Principal outstanding under the Credit Agreement bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) the greater of the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate and 2.5% plus (b) 8.75%. At any time at which an event of default (as described under “—Default Provisions” below) has occurred and is continuing, the interest rate will increase by 4.0%. Accrued interest is payable on a monthly basis.


Scheduled Repayment. No principal repayments are due prior to September 30, 2022, unless we elect to prepay principal as described under “—Optional Prepayment” below or principal is accelerated pursuant to an event of default as described under “—Default Provisions” below. Principal installments in the amount of $300,000 are payable on the last day of each of the eleven months from September 2022 through July 2023, and all remaining principal is payable at maturity on September 3, 2023.
• Interest Rate. Principal outstanding under the Credit Agreement bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) the greater of the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate and 2.5% plus (b) 8.75%. At any time at which an event of default (as described under “—Default Provisions” below) has occurred and is continuing, the interest rate will increase by 4.0%. Accrued interest is payable on a monthly basis.
Optional Prepayment. We may prepay outstanding principal from time to time, subject to payment of a premium on the prepaid principal amount equal to 10% through September 3, 2020, 8% from September 4, 2020 through September 3, 2021, and 4% from September 4, 2021 through September 3, 2022. No premium will be due with respect to any prepayment made on or after September 4, 2022.


Guaranties. Our subsidiaries Chembio Diagnostic Systems Inc. and Chembio Diagnostics Malaysia Sdn Bhd. have guaranteed, and the Lender from time to time may require our other subsidiaries to guarantee, our obligations under the Credit Agreement.
• Scheduled Repayment. No principal repayments are due prior to September 30, 2022, unless we elect to prepay principal as described under “—Optional Prepayment” below or principal is accelerated pursuant to an event of default as described under “—Default Provisions” below. Principal installments in the amount of $300,000 are payable on the last day of each of the eleven months from September 2022 through July 2023, and all remaining principal is payable at maturity on September 3, 2023.
Security. Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by a first priority, perfected lien on substantially all of our property and assets, including our equity interests in our subsidiaries. Our subsidiary Chembio Diagnostic Systems Inc. has secured its guarantee of our Credit Agreement obligations with a lien on substantially all of its assets, and the Lender from time to time may require Chembio Diagnostics Malaysia Sdn Bhd. and any of our other subsidiaries that has guaranteed our Credit Agreement obligations to do the same.


Representations and Warranties; Financial and Other Covenants. In the Credit Agreement we made customary representations and warranties as well as customary affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants limiting additional indebtedness, liens, guaranties, mergers and acquisitions, substantial asset sales, investments and loans, sale and leasebacks, transactions with affiliates, and fundamental changes. The Credit Agreement also contains financial covenants requiring that we maintain aggregate unrestricted cash of not less than $3,000,000 at all times and we achieve specified minimum rolling four-quarter (“last twelve month”) total revenue amounts as of September 30, 2019 and the last day of each calendar quarter thereafter. The minimum total revenue amounts, which range from $32.0 million to $50.1 million, were developed for purposes of the Credit Agreement and do not reflect the internal estimates and plans used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our operating performance, to establish budgets, and to establish operational goals for managing our business. We therefore do not believe that the covenant requirements provide useful information to investors or others in enhancing an understanding of our future prospects.
• Optional Prepayment. We may prepay outstanding principal from time to time, subject to payment of a premium on the prepaid principal amount equal to 10% through September 3, 2020, 8% from September 4, 2020 through September 3, 2021, and 4% from September 4, 2021 through September 3, 2022.

No premium will be due with respect to any prepayment made on or after September 4, 2022.


45
43

• Guaranties. Our subsidiaries Chembio Diagnostic Systems Inc. and Chembio Diagnostics Malaysia Sdn Bhd. have guaranteed, and the Lender from time to time may require our other subsidiaries to guarantee, our obligations under the Credit Agreement.

• Security. Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by a first priority, perfected lien on substantially all of our property and assets, including our equity interests in our subsidiaries. Our subsidiary Chembio Diagnostic Systems Inc. has secured its guarantee of our Credit Agreement obligations with a lien on substantially all of its assets, and the Lender from time to time may require Chembio Diagnostics Malaysia Sdn Bhd. and any of our other subsidiaries that has guaranteed our Credit Agreement obligations to do the same.

• Representations and Warranties; Financial and Other Covenants. In the Credit Agreement we made customary representations and warranties as well as customary affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants limiting additional indebtedness, liens, guaranties, mergers and acquisitions, substantial asset sales, investments and loans, sale and leasebacks, transactions with affiliates, and fundamental changes. The Credit Agreement also contains financial covenants requiring that (i) we maintain aggregate unrestricted cash of not less than $3,000,000 at all times and (ii) we achieve specified minimum rolling four-quarter (“last twelve month”) total revenue amounts as of September 30, 2019 and the last day of each calendar quarter thereafter. The minimum total revenue amounts, which range from $32.0 million to $50.1 million, were developed for purposes of the Credit Agreement and do not reflect the internal estimates and plans used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our operating performance, to establish budgets, and to establish operational goals for managing our business. We therefore do not believe that the covenant requirements provide useful information to investors or others in enhancing an understanding of our future prospects.

• Default Provisions.
Default Provisions. The Credit Agreement provides for customary events of default, including events of default based on non-payment of amounts due under the Credit Agreement, defaults on other debt, misrepresentations, covenant breaches, changes of control, insolvency, bankruptcy and the occurrence of a material adverse effect on the Company. Upon an event of default resulting from a voluntary or involuntary proceeding for bankruptcy, insolvency or receivership, the amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement will become immediately due and payable and the Lender’s commitments will be automatically terminated. Upon the occurrence and continuation of any other event of default, the Lender may accelerate payment of all obligations and terminate the Lender’s commitments under the Credit Agreement. Upon an acceleration of payment following an event of default occurring prior to September 4, 2021, the amounts due and payable by us will include a prepayment premium on accelerated principal in the amount described under “—Optional Prepayment” above.

We were in compliance with the cash balance and revenue financial covenants as of December 31, 2020.

Equity and Equity-Related Securities. We raised additional capital from an underwritten public offering of common stock in 2020 in the amount described under “—Optional Prepayment” above.of $28.4 million (net of expenses).


In connection with entering into the Credit Agreement, on September 3, 2019, we issued to the Lender a seven-year warrant, or the Warrant, to purchase up to 550,000 shares of our common stock at a per-share exercise price of $5.22. The Warrant is exercisable for cash or on a net, or “cashless,” basis, and the exercise price of the Warrant is subject to price-based, weighted-average antidilution adjustments for one year after issuance.

Equity and Equity-Related Securities. We did not raise additional capital from a public offering of Common Stock in 2019.

Research and Development Awards. We frequentlyroutinely seek research and development programs that may be awarded by government, non-governmental organizations, and non-profit entities, including private foundations.

Since 2015 we have earnedreceived over $12.2$14.2 million of funding from some of the world’s leading health organizations, which has helped us accelerate the expansion of our pipeline of infectious disease tests. Our collaborators have included Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, The Paul G. Allen Family Foundation, FIOCRUZ and FIND, as well as U.S. government agencies such as CDC,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority or BARDA, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. See “Item 1. Business—Products” above. During the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, we recognized grant revenue totaling $1.4$2 million from government, non-governmental organizations, and non-profit entities.


Working Capital. The following table sets forth selected working capital information:


 December 31, 2019  December 31, 2020 
 (in thousands)  (in thousands) 
Cash and cash equivalents $18,271  $23,066 
Accounts receivable, net  3,661   3,377 
Inventories, net  9,598   12,516 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  693   779 
Total current assets  32,223   39,738 
Less: Total current liabilities  (6,442)  12,351 
Working capital $25,781  $27,387 


On December 2, 2020, we were awarded a contract of $12.7 million from BARDA to assist us in (a) developing, and requesting an EUA from the FDA for, the DPP Respiratory Panel and (b) performing the clinical trials for and submitting the DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen system to the FDA for a 510(k).

Our cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 20192020, which included a restricted amount of $1.0 million, were unrestricted and held for working capital purposes. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends. We have not entered into, and do not expect to enter into, investments for trading or speculative purposes. Our accounts receivable and inventory balances fluctuate from period to period, which affects our cash flow from operating activities. Fluctuations vary depending on cash collections, client mix, raw material lead times, the mix of vendor terms, and the timing of shipment of our products and the invoicing of our research and development activities.


Uses of Funds


Cash Flow Used in Operating Activities. Our operations used $9.1$18.9 million of cash during the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, primarily due to the net loss adjusted for non-cash items of $10.6$7.3 million a $3.8 million decrease in accounts receivable related to favorable collections timing, and a $1.5$6.5 million increase in inventory related to supply chain timelines.

Acquisition. In November 2019, we acquired all oftimelines, including materials for COVID-19 systems that were ordered but could not be cancelled following the equity interests of Orangelife for a purchase price netRevocation.  Those uses of cash acquiredwere offset in part by a $3.9 million increase in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, a $1.5 million increase in deferred revenue, and a $0.3 million reduction in accounts receivable.

Capital Expenditures. Our capital expenditures totaled $4.2 million in 2020, of $100,000 in cash, and 153,707 common shares, with an additional 316,456 common shares that would be deliverable as an earnout, based on the achievement of certain milestones between 2020 and 2022.

Capital Expenditures. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we advanced our planwhich $4.0 million related to investinvestments in automated manufacturing equipment, facilities, and other fixed assets. Our

We have capital expenditures totaled $3.5purchase obligations of $1.3 million in 2019.related to additional automated manufacturing equipment with payments expected to come due during 2021 based on vendor performance milestones.


Effects of Inflation


InflationOther than the impact of increases in minimum wage levels in New York, inflation and changing prices have not had a material effect on our business, and we do not expect that they will materially affect our business in the foreseeable future. Any impact of inflation on cost of revenue and operating expenses, especially employee compensation costs (including any effects of future increases in minimum wages levels in New York), may not be readily recoverable in the price of our product offerings.


47Q1’21 Restructuring Charge


TableOn January 14, 2021, the Company’s Board of ContentsDirectors (the “Board”) approved a restructuring plan (“2021 Plan”) to better align its business priorities. The Plan comprises the termination of employees primarily in the manufacturing department. These actions were intended to better align the Company’s cost structure with the skills and resources required to more effectively pursue opportunities in the marketplace and execute the Company’s long-term growth strategy.

Costs associated with the 2021 Plan are primarily related to Severance and Legal costs. Severance payouts are expected to be substantially completed by the end of the six months ending June 30, 2021. Under the 2021 Plan, the Company expects to incur pre-tax charges between approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates


Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 32 – Significant Accounting Policies to the audited consolidated financial statements included herein. Certain of our accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on our historical experience, terms of existing contracts, our evaluation of trends in the industry, information provided by our customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if:

Itif (a) it requires us to make assumptions about matters that were uncertain at the time we were making the estimate and
Changes (b) changes in the estimate or different estimates that we could have selected would have had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.


The following listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies.  In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, with no need for management’s judgment in their application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any viable alternative would not produce a materially different result.


Revenue Recognition


We recognize revenue for product sales in accordance with FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Revenues from product sales are recognized when the customer obtains control of our product, which occurs at a point in time, typically upon tendering to the customer. We expense incremental costs of obtaining a contract as and when incurred because the expected amortization period of the asset that it would have recognized is one year or less or the amount is immaterial. Freight and distribution activities on products are performed after the customer obtains control of the goods. We have made an accounting policy election to account for shipping and handling activities that occur either when or after goods are tendered to the customer as a fulfillment activity, and therefore recognizes freight and distribution expenses in Costcost of Product Sales. The Company excludesproduct sales. We exclude certain taxes from the transaction price (e.g.(e.g., sales, value added and some excise taxes).


Product revenue reserves, which are classified as a reduction in product revenue, are generally related to discounts and returns. Estimates of variable consideration and the determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based on all information (historical, current, and forecasted) that is reasonably available to the Company, taking into consideration the type of customer, the type of transaction, market events and trends, and the specific facts and circumstances of each arrangement. The transaction price, which includes variable consideration reflecting the impact of discounts, allowances and returns may be subject to constraint and is included in the net sales price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of the amount of the cumulative revenue recognized will not occur in a future period. Actual amounts may ultimately differ from the Company’s estimates. If actual results vary, the Company adjusts these estimates, which could have an effect on revenue and earnings in the period of adjustment.

For certainapplicable contracts, we recognize revenue from research and development, milestone and grant revenues when earned.  Grants are invoiced after expenses are incurred. Revenues from projects or grants funded in advance are deferred until earned. For certain collaborative research projects, we recognize revenue by defining milestones at the inception of the agreement and applying judgement and estimates in recognizing revenue for relevant contracts.


Stock-Based Compensation


We recognize the fair value of equity-based awards as compensation expense in our consolidated statement of operations. The fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards are their fair value on the date of grant. The fair value of our stock option awards was estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. This valuation model’s computations incorporate highly subjective assumptions, such as the expected stock price volatility and the estimated life of each award. The fair value of equity-based awards, after considering the effect of expected forfeitures, is then amortized, generally on a straight-line basis, over the related vesting period of the option.


Research and Development Costs


Research and development activities consist primarily of new product development, continuing engineering for existing products, and regulatory and clinical trial costs. Costs related to research and development efforts on existing or potential products are expensed/accrued as incurred.


Inventories


Inventories are stated at the lower of cost andor net realizable value with cost being determined using a standard cost method, which approximates average cost. Average cost consists primarily of material, labor and manufacturing overhead expenses (including fixed production-overhead costs). The Company analyzes its inventory levels quarterly and writes down, in the first-in, first-out method, or FIFO, to determine cost.  Our policy is to periodically evaluate the market value of theapplicable period, inventory and the stage of product life cycle, and record a reserve for any inventory considered slow moving or obsolete. For example, each additional 1% ofthat has become obsolete, inventory would reduce suchthat has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value and inventory by approximately $95,980.in excess of expected customer demand. The Company also writes off, in the applicable period, the costs related to expired inventory. Costs of purchased inventories are recorded using weighted-average costing.


Accounts Receivable


Our policy is to review our accounts receivable on a periodic basis, no less frequently than monthly. On a quarterly basis an analysis is made of the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts and adjustments are made accordingly. The current allowance iswas approximately 0.6% of accounts receivable. For example, each additional 1% of accounts receivable that becomes uncollectible would reduce such balance of accounts receivable by approximately $36,613.

Acquisitions

In accordance with accounting guidance for the provisions in FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations, we allocate the purchase price of an acquired business to its identifiable assets and liabilities based on estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the amount allocated to the assets and liabilities, if any, is recorded as goodwill. In addition, an acquisition may include a contingent consideration component. The fair value of the contingent consideration is estimated as of the date of the acquisition and is recorded as part of the purchase price. This estimate is updated in future periods and any changes in the estimate, which are not considered an adjustment to the purchase price, are recorded in our consolidated statements of operations.December 31, 2020.

We use all available information to estimate fair values. We typically engage outside appraisal firms to assist in the fair value determination of identifiable intangible assets and any other significant assets or liabilities. We may adjust the preliminary purchase price allocation, if necessary, up to one year after the acquisition closing date if we obtain more information regarding asset valuations and liabilities assumed that materially differs from the information available during the time of close.

Our purchase price allocation methodology contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities. Management estimates the fair value of assets and liabilities based upon quoted market prices, the carrying value of the acquired assets and widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows and market multiple analyses. Unanticipated events or circumstances may occur which could affect the accuracy of our fair value estimates, including assumptions regarding industry economic factors and business strategies.

Other estimates used in determining fair value include, but are not limited to, future cash flows or income related to intangibles, market rate assumptions, actuarial assumptions for benefit plans and appropriate discount rates. Our estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but that are inherently uncertain, and therefore, may not be realized. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the estimates, assumptions, and values reflected in the valuations will be realized, and actual results could vary materially.

Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets


We periodically review goodwill for impairment indicators. We review goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. We perform the goodwill impairment review at the reporting unit level. We perform a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. If not, no further goodwill impairment testing is performed. If so, we perform the step discussed hereafter. Our qualitative assessment involves significant estimates, assumptions, and judgments, including, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, our financial performance, reporting unit specific events and changes in our share price.


If the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, goodwill is not considered to be impaired. We would recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, provided the impairment charge does not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.


Income TaxesIndefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually during the first fiscal quarter of the year, and when events or changes in circumstances indicate the assets might be impaired. Impairment is indicated when the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value.

Income taxes are accounted for under FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes, authoritative guidance, which we refer to as the Guidance and which requires the asset and liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets or liabilities at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered.

The Guidance also requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.  A review of all available positive and negative evidence needs to be considered, including a company’s current and past performance, the market environment in which the company operates, length of carryback and carryforward periods and existing contracts that will result in future profits.

The Guidance also prescribes a comprehensive model for recognizing, measuring, presenting and disclosing in the consolidated financial statements tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, including a decision whether to file or not to file in a particular jurisdiction.


Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements


Refer to Note 32 – Significant Accounting Policies to the audited consolidated financial statements included herein for a complete description of recent accounting standards whichthat we have not yet been required to implement which may be applicable to our operations. Additionally, the significant accounting standards that have been adopted during the year ended December 31, 20192020 are described.


50
46


ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


The Consolidated Financial Statements and schedules that constitute Item 8 are attached at the end of this report.  An index to the Consolidated Financial Statements and supplemental schedules isare also included on page F-1 of this report.


ITEM 9A.Controls and Procedures


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


Our management, with the participation of our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2019.2020. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 20192020 at the reasonable assurance level.


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:


pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. As a result, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Under the supervision and with the participation of our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2020. In making their assessment of internal control over financial reporting, our management used the criteria described in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Our evaluation included documenting, evaluating and testing of the design and operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, we concluded that our controls over financial reporting were effective as of December 31, 2019.2020.


Previously Identified Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


None.


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting


There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in management’s evaluation pursuant to Rules 13a-15(d) or 15d-15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Shareholders and Board of Directors
Chembio Diagnostics, Inc.
Hauppauge, New York

Opinion on Internal Control over

Management, including the Comapny’s Chief Excutive Officer and Chief Financial Reporting

We have audited Chembio Diagnostics, Inc.’s (the “Company’s”)Officer, does not expect that the Company’s internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent liminations in all control systems, no evaluation of internal control over financial reporting ascan provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.

We alsofraud, if any, have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and our report dated March 13, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessmentbeen detected. Also, any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, includedcontrols in the accompanying “Item 9A, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting”. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that those internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in business conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies orand procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ BDO USA, LLP
ITEM 9B.Other Information
None.

Melville, NY
March 13, 2020

PART III


ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


The information required in response to this Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


The information required in response to this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS


The information required in response to this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.


The information required in response to this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES


The information required in response to this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


53
48

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


(a) See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” above.


(b) Exhibits


Exhibit
No.
 Description
3.1 
3.2 
4.1 
Description of Securities
10.1(a)* 
10.1(b)* 
10.2(a)* 
10.2(b)* 
10.3*10.3 
10.4* 
10.5* 
10.6*‡
10.6(a)10.7(a)* 
10.6(b)10.7(b)* 
10.7*
10.8(a)* 
10.8(b)* 
10.9* 
10.10
10.11(a)10.10(a) 
10.11(b)10.10(b) 
10.1210.11 
10.1310.12 
10.14†10.13† 
10.14*‡
10.15*
14.1 
 
23.1 Consent of EY, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consent of BDO USA, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
32.1 
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)


*Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.
Certain exhibits and schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. We hereby undertake to furnish copies of the omitted exhibits and schedules upon request by the Securities and Exchange Commission, provided that we may request confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the exhibits and schedules so furnished.
Certain sensitive personally identifiable information in this exhibit was omitted by means of redacting a portion of the text and replacing it with [***].
**The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 accompany the Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


SIGNATURES


In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC.




March 13, 202011, 2021By/s/ Gail S. PageRichard L. Eberly


Gail S. PageRichard L. Eberly


Interim Chief Executive Officer and President


In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Signatures Title Date
     
/s/ Gail S. PageRichard L. Eberly Interim Chief Executive Officer and DirectorPresident March 13, 202011, 2021
Gail S. PageRichard L. Eberly (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/ Neil A. Goldman Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer March 13, 202011, 2021
Neil A. Goldman (Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)  
     
/s/ Katherine L. Davis Chair of the Board March 13, 202011, 2021
Katherine L. Davis
/s/ David W. K. Acheson
DirectorMarch 11, 2021
David W. K. Acheson
/s/ David W. Bespalko
DirectorMarch 11, 2021
David W. Bespalko    
     
/s/ Mary Lake Polan Director March 13, 202011, 2021
Mary Lake Polan    
     
/s/ John G. Potthoff Director March 13, 202011, 2021
John G. Potthoff    


CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements


—INDEX—




Page(s)Pages
ReportReports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-1 and F-2



Consolidated Financial Statements:




Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20192020 and 20182019F-2F-3




Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019F-3F-4




Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019F-4F-5




Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019F-5F-6




Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019F-6F-7




Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7F-8 - F-30F-28



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Chembio Diagnostics, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Chembio Diagnostics, Inc. (and subsidiaries) (the Company) as of December 31, 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the account or disclosure  to which it relates.

Description of the
Matter
Revenue Recognition – Variable Consideration
For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized $24.8 million of net product revenue. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, variable consideration, which includes the effect of estimated future returns, is included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of the cumulative revenues recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.
Auditing the Company’s measurement of variable consideration related to future returns was especially complex and involved a higher degree of subjectivity due to the significant estimation uncertainty. The estimation of variable consideration was dependent upon significant assumptions such as the probability of future returns and the likelihood of changes in approval by regulatory agencies. Changes in management’s significant assumptions can have a material effect on the amount and timing of revenue recognized.
How We Addressed
the Matter in Our
Audit
To test the estimation of variable consideration, our audit procedures included, among others, the evaluation of the completeness of the underlying data used in management’s calculation and testing the significant assumptions described above. For example, these procedures included evaluating the likelihood of changes in regulatory approval, inspection of Company’s correspondences with the third parties and regulatory agencies, and corroborating inquiries of the Company’s operational personnel in order to support management’s assumptions. We also tested subsequent cash collection for products shipped to third party customers and performed a lookback analysis comparing actual product returns to the reserve established by management.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020.
Jericho, New York
March 11, 2021


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Shareholders and Board of Directors
Chembio Diagnostics, Inc.
Hauppauge, New York


Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of Chembio Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019, and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows the yearsyear then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and subsidiaries at December 31, 2019, and 2018, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and our report dated March 13, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


Change in Accounting Principle


On January 1, 2019, the Company changed its method of accounting for leases due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 842, Leases. The effects of the adoption are described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.


Basis for Opinion


These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits.audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.


Our auditsaudit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our auditsaudit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ BDO USA, LLP


We have served as the Company’sCompany's auditor since 2011.from 2011 to 2019.


Melville, NY
March 13, 2020


CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF


 December 31, 
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018  2020  2019 
- ASSETS -           
CURRENT ASSETS:           
Cash and cash equivalents $18,271,352  $12,524,551  $23,066,301  $18,271,352 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $62,000 and $42,000 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively  3,661,325   7,373,971 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $296,793 and $62,000 at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively  3,377,387   3,661,325 
Inventories, net  9,598,030   7,851,222   12,516,402   9,598,030 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  693,013   702,010   778,683   693,013 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS  32,223,720   28,451,754   39,738,773   32,223,720 
                
FIXED ASSETS:                
Property, plant and equipment, net  5,933,569   2,873,920   8,688,403   5,933,569 
Finance lease right-of-use assets, net  210,350      233,134   210,350 
                
OTHER ASSETS:                
Operating right-of-use assets, net  7,030,744      6,112,632   7,030,744 
Intangible assets, net  3,914,352   3,884,831   3,645,986   3,914,352 
Goodwill  5,872,690   4,983,127   5,963,744   5,872,690 
Deposits and other assets  543,539   717,551   509,342   543,539 
                
TOTAL ASSETS $55,728,964  $40,911,183  $64,892,014  $55,728,964 
   
- LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY -                
CURRENT LIABILITIES:                
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $5,526,243  $5,888,681  $10,042,790  $5,526,243 
Deferred revenue  125,000   422,905   1,606,997   125,000 
Note payable  180,249   207,694 
Notes Payable  0   180,249 
Operating lease liabilities  642,460   568,294 
Finance lease liabilities  41,894      58,877   41,894 
Operating lease liabilities  568,294    
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES  6,441,680   6,519,280   12,351,124   6,441,680 
                
OTHER LIABILITIES:                
Long-term operating lease liabilities  6,969,603      6,327,143   6,969,603 
Long-term finance lease liabilities  171,953      185,239   171,953 
Note payable     171,821 
Long-term debt net of debt discount and issuance costs  17,644,149    
Long-term debt, less current portion, net  18,182,158   17,644,149 
Deferred tax liability  466,326   892,308   69,941   466,326 
                
TOTAL LIABILITIES  31,693,711   7,583,409   37,115,605   31,693,711 
                
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 12)          0   0 
                
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:                
Preferred stock – 10,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding      
Common stock - $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 17,733,617 and 17,166,459 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively  177,335   171,664 
Preferred stock – 10,000,000 shares authorized, NaN outstanding  0   0 
Common stock - $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 20,223,498 and 17,733,617 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively  202,235   177,335 
Additional paid-in capital  95,433,077   90,953,788   124,961,514   95,433,077 
Accumulated deficit  (71,585,003)  (57,909,874)  (97,106,331)  (71,585,003)
Treasury stock – 41,141 and 0 shares at cost, at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively  (190,093)  0 
Accumulated other comprehensive income  9,844

  112,196   (90,916)  9,844 
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY  24,035,253   33,327,774   27,776,409   24,035,253 
                
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $55,728,964  $40,911,183  $64,892,014  $55,728,964 


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements



CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED
  For the years ended 
  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
REVENUES:      
Net product sales $28,844,997  $27,913,209 
R&D and grant revenue  4,680,282   5,719,458 
License and royalty revenue  938,753   948,773 
TOTAL REVENUES  34,464,032   34,581,440 
         
COSTS AND EXPENSES:        
Cost of product sales  22,394,317   22,599,432 
Research and development expenses  8,538,416   8,526,256 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  16,138,424   11,100,775 
Acquisition costs  721,465   337,645 
   47,792,622   42,564,108 
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (13,328,590)  (7,982,668)
         
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME:        
Interest (expense) income, net  (846,831)  49,498 
         
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT  (14,175,421)  (7,933,170)
         
Income tax benefit  (500,292)  (67,521)
         
NET LOSS $(13,675,129) $(7,865,649)
         
Basic loss per share $(0.81) $(0.54)
         
Diluted loss per share $(0.81) $(0.54)
         
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, basic  16,954,142   14,432,505 
         
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, diluted  16,954,142   14,432,505 


 December 31, 
  2020  2019 
REVENUES:      
Product revenue $24,767,149  $28,844,997 
R&D revenue  4,851,562   4,025,538 
Government grant income  2,018,924   654,744 
License and royalty revenue  832,562   938,753 
TOTAL REVENUES  32,470,197   34,464,032 
         
COSTS AND EXPENSES:        
Cost of product sales  23,874,487   22,394,317 
Research and development expenses  9,508,494   8,538,416 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  21,037,701   16,138,424 
Severance and related costs  1,122,310   0 
Acquisition costs  63,497   721,465 
   55,606,489   47,792,622 
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (23,136,292)  (13,328,590)
         
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME:        
Interest expense, net  (2,841,830)  (846,831)
         
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT  (25,978,122)  (14,175,421)
         
Income tax benefit  456,794   500,292 
         
NET LOSS $(25,521,328) $(13,675,129)
         
Basic and diluted loss per share $(1.34) $(0.81)
         
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, basic and diluted  19,085,691   16,954,142 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements



CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED
  For the years ended 
  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
       
Net loss $(13,675,129) $(7,865,649)
Other comprehensive loss:        
Foreign currency translation adjustments  (102,352)  (66,752)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(13,777,481) $(7,932,401)

 December 31, 
  2020  2019 
       
Net loss $(25,521,328) $(13,675,129)
Other comprehensive loss:        
Foreign currency translation adjustments  (100,760)  (102,352)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(25,622,088) $(13,777,481)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements



CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019,2020 AND 20182019
       
  Common Stock  
Additional
Paid-in-Capital
Amount
  Treasury Stock  
Accumulated
Deficit
Amount
  
AOCI
Amount
  
Total
Amount
 
 Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount 
Balance at December 31, 2018  17,166,459  $171,664  $90,953,788   0  $0  $(57,909,874) $112,196  $33,327,774 
                                 
Common Stock:                                
Restricted stock issued  381,908   3,819   (128,081)  0   0   0   0   (124,262)
Restricted stock compensation  -   0   1,394,812   0   0   0   0   1,394,812 
Issuance of common stock for business acquired  153,707   1,537   441,754   0   0   0   0   443,291 
                                 
Options:                                
Exercised  31,543   315   32,171   0   0   0   0   32,486 
Stock option compensation  -   0   261,088   -   0   0   0   261,088 
                                 
Warrants and Other:                                
Warrant on Term Debt  -   0   1,196,093   -   0   0   0   1,196,093 
Contingent Earnout for business acquired  -   0   1,281,452   -   0   0   0   1,281,452 
                                 
Comprehensive loss  -   0   0   -   0   0   (102,352)  (102,352)
                                 
Net loss  -   0   0   -   0   (13,675,129)  0   (13,675,129)
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2019  17,733,617  $177,335  $95,433,077   0  $0  $(71,585,003) $9,844  $24,035,253 
                                 
Common Stock:                                
Issuance of stock, net  2,619,593   26,196   28,410,544   0   0   0   0   28,436,740 
Restricted stock issued  81,773   819   128,356   0   0   0   0   129,175 
Restricted stock compensation, net  (470,174)  (4,702)  617,919   0   0   0   0   613,217 
Shares tendered for withholding taxes  -   0   (296,667)  -   0   0   0   (296,667)
                                 
Options:                                
Exercised  5,528   55   (55)                  0 
Stock option compensation  -   0   480,779   -   0   0   0   480,779 
                                 
Warrants exercised  253,161   2,532   (2,532)  -   0   0   0   0 
                                 
Treasury stock  -   -   190,093   (41,141)  (190,093)  -   -   0 
                                 
Comprehensive loss  -   -   0   -   0   0   (100,760)  (100,760)
                                 
Net loss  -   0   0   -   0   (25,521,328)  0   (25,521,328)
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2020  20,223,498  $202,235  $124,961,514   (41,141) $(190,093) $(97,106,331) $(90,916) $27,776,409 



Common Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in-Capital
Amount


Accumulated
Deficit
Amount

 
AOCI
Amount


Total
Amount
 
Shares  Amount
Balance at December 31, 2017  12,318,570  $123,185  $62,821,288  $(50,044,225) $178,948  $13,079,196 
                         
Common Stock:                        
New stock from offerings  4,509,760   45,098   27,431,162         27,476,260 
Restricted stock issued  266,839   2,668   (2,668)         
Restricted stock compensation        281,249         281,249 
                         
Options:                        
Exercised  71,290   713   71,201         71,914 
Stock option compensation        351,556         351,556 
                         
Comprehensive loss              (66,752)  (66,752)
                         
Net loss           (7,865,649)     (7,865,649)
                         
Balance at December 31, 2018  17,166,459  $171,664  $90,953,788  $(57,909,874) $112,196  $33,327,774 
                         
Common Stock:                        
Restricted stock issued  381,908   3,819   (128,081)        (124,262)
Restricted stock compensation        1,394,812         1,394,812 
Issuance of common stock for business acquired  153,707   1,537   441,754         443,291 
                         
Options:                        
Exercised  31,543   315   32,171         32,486 
Stock option compensation        261,088         261,088 
                         
Warrants and Other:                        
Warrant on Term Debt        1,196,093         1,196,093 
Contingent Earnout for business acquired        1,281,452         1,281,452 
                         
Comprehensive loss              (102,352)  (102,352)
                         
Net loss           (13,675,129)     (13,675,129)
                         
Balance at December 31, 2019  17,733,617  $177,335  $95,433,077  $(71,585,003) $9,844
 $24,035,253 


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements



CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED


 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018  December 31, 
      2020  2019 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:           
Cash received from customers and grants $37,930,172  $29,804,273  $34,736,133  $37,930,172 
Cash paid to suppliers and employees  (45,655,562)  (41,624,299)  (50,238,409)  (45,655,562)
Cash paid for operating and finance leases  (640,844)   
Cash paid for operating leases  (1,139,944)  (632,952)
Cash paid for finance leases  (19,987)  (7,892)
Interest and taxes, net  (689,272)  38,585   (2,225,031)  (689,272)
Net cash used in operating activities  (9,055,506)  (11,781,441)  (18,887,238)  (9,055,506)
                
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired  (100,000)  (5,491,204)  0   (100,000)
Acquisition of and deposits on fixed assets  (3,502,540)  (1,467,192)  (3,961,369)  (3,502,540)
Patent Application Costs  (297,006)     (205,493)  (297,006)
Working capital adjustments related to business combination  145,760    
Working capital adjustment related to business combination  0   145,760 
Net cash used in investing activities  (3,753,786)  (6,958,396)  (4,166,862)  (3,753,786)
                
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net  28,436,740   0 
Proceeds from option exercises  32,486   71,914   0   32,486 
Principal payments for finance leases  (19,875)     (51,166)  (19,875)
Payments on debt issuance costs  (186,313)     0   (186,313)
Payments on note payable  (181,822)  (64,481)  (180,249)  (181,822)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net  18,850,000      0   18,850,000 
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net     27,476,260 
Stimulus package loan  2,978,315   0 
Payment of stimulus package loan  (2,978,315)  0 
Payments of tax withholdings on stock award  (441,723)  0 
Net cash provided by financing activities  18,494,476   27,483,693   27,763,602   18,494,476 
                
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash  61,617   (9,607)  85,447   61,617 
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  5,746,801   8,734,249   4,794,949   5,746,801 
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of the period  12,524,551   3,790,302   18,271,352   12,524,551 
                
Cash and cash equivalents - end of the period $18,271,352  $12,524,551  $23,066,301  $18,271,352 
                
RECONCILIATION OF NET LOSS TO NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                
                
Net Loss $(13,675,129) $(7,865,649) $(25,521,328) $(13,675,129)
Adjustments:                
Depreciation and amortization  1,916,194   902,505   2,697,126   1,916,194 
Share based compensation  1,655,900   632,805   1,223,171   1,655,900 
Benefit from deferred tax liability  (513,715)  (78,432)  (396,385)  (513,715)
Provision for doubtful accounts  20,000      270,193   20,000 
Non-cash inventory changes  3,543,515   0 
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:                
Accounts receivable  3,764,045   (5,150,072)  283,939   3,764,045 
Inventories  (1,457,612)  (3,077,104)  (6,461,887)  (1,457,612)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  64,355   (118,293)  (85,670)  64,355 
Deposits and other assets  (90,624)     34,195   (90,624)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  (441,015)  2,599,894   4,043,896   (441,015)
Deferred revenue  (297,905)  372,905   1,481,997   (297,905)
Net cash used in operating activities $(9,055,506) $(11,781,441) $(18,887,238) $(9,055,506)
                
Supplemental disclosures for non-cash investing and financing activities:                
Deposits on manufacturing equipment transferred to fixed assets $430,000  $257,455  $472,651  $430,000 
Deposits and other assets transferred to intangible assets     118,899 
Seller-financed equipment purchases     326,110 
Issuance of common stock for net assets of business acquired  443,291      0   443,291 
Contingent liability earnout  1,225,000      1,011,261   1,225,000 


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements



NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS:


Chembio Diagnostics, Inc. (“Chembio”) and its subsidiaries (collectively with Chembio, the “Company” or “Chembio”), develop manufacture, and commercialize point-of-care diagnosticrapid tests that are used to detectfor the detection and diagnose diseases. The Company is pursuing three corporate priorities: (1) expand its commercialization, (2) advance its researchdiagnosis of infectious diseases, including COVID-19, sexually transmitted disease, and development pipeline,fever and (3) prepare for future growth.

All products that are currently being developed are based ontropical disease. Coupled with the Company’s patentedextensive scientific expertise, its novel DPP® technology a novel point-of-care diagnostic platform that offers certain customer advantages as compared to traditional lateral flow technology.

The Company’s product commercialization and product development efforts are focused onbroad market applications beyond infectious disease testing and technology collaborations. In infectious disease, the Company is commercializing tests for HIV and Syphilis, Zika virus, and developing tests for malaria, dengue virus, chikungunya virus, ebola, lassa, Marburg, leptospirosis, Rickettsia typhi, Burkholderia pseudomallei, and Orientia tsutsugamushi, individually or as part of fever panel tests. Through technology collaborations, the Company is developing tests for concussion, bovine tuberculosis, a rare disease in collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical, and a biomarker development project in collaboration with AstraZeneca.

Large and growing markets have been established for these kinds of tests, initially in high prevalence regions where they are indispensable for large scale prevention and treatment programs. More generally, the Company believes there is and will continue to be a growing demand for diagnostic products that can provide accurate, actionable diagnostic information in a rapid, cost-effective manner at the point of care.

The Company’sdisease. Chembio’s products are sold globally, directly and through distributors, to medicalhospitals and clinics, physician offices, clinical laboratories, and hospitals, governmental and public health entities, non-governmental organizations, medical professionalsgovernment agencies, and retail establishments, both domestically and internationally,consumers under the Company’s DPP, STAT PAK,®, SURE CHECK®, and STAT-VIEW® or DPP® registered trademarks or under the private labels of the Company’s marketing partners.


The Company routinely enters into arrangements with governmentalhas been expanding its product portfolio based upon its proprietary DPP technology platform that provides high-quality, rapid diagnostic results in 15 to 20 minutes using a small drop of blood from the fingertip or alternative samples. Through advanced multiplexing, the DPP platform can detect up to eight, distinct test results from a single patient sample, which can deliver greater clinical value than other rapid tests. For certain applications, Chembio’s easy-to-use, highly portable, battery-operated DPP Micro Reader optical analyzer then reports accurate results in approximately 15 seconds, making it well-suited for decentralized testing where real-time results enable patients to be clinically assessed while they are still onsite. Objective results produced by the DPP Micro Reader can reduce the possibility of the types of human error that can be experienced in the visual interpretations required by many rapid tests.

All DPP tests are developed and non-governmental organizationsmanufactured in the United States and are the subject of a range of domestic and global patents and patents pending.

During 2020, the Company refocused its business strategy on the development and commercialization of the DPP COVID-19 IgM/IgG System, which consists of a new serological test for COVID-19 and a Micro Reader analyzer. In the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, the Company developed, received regulatory approval in the US, Brazil and Europe, and commercialized the DPP COVID-19 IgM/IgG System, which provided numerical readings for both IgM and IgG levels of antibodies to the virus, and began developing its strategy for a portfolio of products both related to and expanding beyond COVID-19. On June 16, 2020, the U.S. FDA Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) revoked the Company’s Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”) for the funding of certain researchDPP COVID-19 System in the U.S., and development efforts.the Company immediately began developing a revised version. The Company submitted an application for EUA to the FDA for its new rapid antibody test system, DPP SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG on September 8, 2020 (the “IgM/IgG EUA”).

NOTE 2 — ACQUISITIONS:

Orangelife


On November 25, 2019, pursuant to a quote purchase agreement,December 3, 2020, the Company acquired allreceived from the FDA a letter responding to the IgM/IgG EUA. The response letter stated that, given the volume of EUA requests it has received, the FDA was prioritizing review of EUA requests for tests, taking into account a variety of factors such as the public health need for the product and the availability of the outstanding sharesproduct. The response letter further stated that the FDA determined that review of Orangelife Comercio e Industria Ltda.,the IgM/IgG EUA request was not a priority because, for example, authorization of the test would have relatively limited impact on testing accessibility or Orangelife,testing capacity, and therefore the FDA declined to review the IgM/IgG EUA request at that time.

On July 6, 2020, the Company received a privately-held Brazilian company,$628,071 grant from the Department of Health and Human Services; Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response; Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Division of Research Innovation and Ventures (“BARDA”) to assist the Company in developing a COVID-19 point-of-care antigen system using Chembio’s proprietary DPP technology and submitting an application for EUA to the FDA for the system. On October 15, 2020, Chembio submitted the EUA application for the DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen test system, which is an original equipment manufacturerwas designed to detect SARS-CoV-2 antigens in only 20 minutes. The DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen test system consists of a DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen test cartridge, a DPP Micro Reader optical analyzer and a minimally-invasive nasal swab.

On December 2, 2020, the Company received a $12,691,726 grant from BARDA to support the development and pursuit of FDA EUA for a rapid, multiplex DPP Respiratory Antigen Panel point-of-care tests approved bytest system. The contract also supports preparation of a submission in pursuit of FDA 510(k) clearance for the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, or ANVISA) for infectious diseases that include HIV, Hepatitis C, Zika, Chikungunya, and Dengue Fever. Orangelife tests are manufactured in its Rio de Janeiro facility, which is ISO-certified and approved by ANVISA to produce Class II/III/IV medical devices. The purchase price includes the following consideration:Company’s rapid DPP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen test system.


·$150,000 in cash and 153,707 shares of our common stock.

·Issuance of 316,456 shares of our common stock to Dr. Manco Collovati, the founder and former CEO of Orangelife, based on the transfer and approval of certain of our product registration in Brazil prior to November 25, 2022. All of the shares may be deliverable in the event of change in control of our company. The number of shares issued is subjected to adjustments based upon Orangelife’s working capital at closing. The fair value of the shares on the date of the acquisition are recorded in equity.


The purchase considerationDPP Respiratory Antigen Panel test system is subjectintended to routine post-closing adjustments.provide simultaneous, discrete, and differential detection of Influenza A, Influenza B, and SARS-CoV-2 antigens from a single patient respiratory specimen, such as a nasal or nasopharyngeal swab. It is expected to provide results in approximately 20 minutes and be run on Chembio’s DPP Micro Reader analyzer. The acquisitionsystem is intended to enable appropriate clinical management of Orangelife will allow uspatients with suspected respiratory infections and assist in the containment of COVID-19 cases during the flu season.

In addition to expand our commercial presence by offering ourits DPP COVID-19 rapid test products, the Company has a broad portfolio of infectious disease products, which it expects to generate a diminished amount of revenue for the foreseeable future both due to the state, private, and pharmacy markets in Brazil, in addition to providing local support to our long time customer Bio-Manguinhos, the subsidiaryimpact of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz) that overseesglobal COVID-19 pandemic and while it focuses on the development, manufacture, and productioncommercialization of vaccines, diagnostics, and biopharmaceuticals, primarily to meetDPP COVID-19 products. Through Research & Development (“R&D”) Services, the demands of Brazil’s national public health system. The results of Orangelife’s operations have been reflectedCompany is developing tests in the consolidated financial statements since November 25, 2019.collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

F-7
F-8

The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the closing date of November 25, 2019:

  Amount 
Net current assets $320,293 
Property, plant and equipment and other assets  226,035 
Inventory  289,205 
Goodwill  986,058 
Deferred tax liability  (50,000)
Other intangible assets (estimated useful life):    
Trade name (0.5 years)  5,000 
Customer contracts / relationships (5 years)  195,000 
Total consideration $1,971,591 

The Company calculated the fair value of the fixed assets based on the net book value of Orangelife as that approximates fair value. The trade name, customer contracts/relationships and contingent earnouts were based on discounted cash flows using management estimates.

As a result of the consideration paid exceeding the fair value of the net assets acquired, goodwill in the amount of $986,058 was recorded in connection with this acquisition, none of which will be deductible for tax purposes. In addition, the Company recorded $200,000 in intangible assets associated with the addition of Orangelife’s trade name and customer base. The Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 include $325,853 of transaction costs related to the Orangelife acquisition.

The following represents pro forma operating results for the year ended December 31, 2019 as if the operations of Orangelife had been included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations as of January 1, 2019. This pro forma financial information is unaudited and presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have occurred if the acquisition of Orangelife and the other transactions contemplated by this acquisition had been completed as of January 1, 2019, nor is it necessarily indicative of the future operating results of Chembio Diagnostics and Orangelife on a combined and consolidated basis.


  
Unaudited Proforma
December 31, 2019
  
Total revenues $35,157,248 
     
Net loss $(13,654,001)
     
Net loss per common share $(0.80)
     
Diluted net loss per common share $(0.80)


opTricon

On November 6, 2018, pursuant to a share purchase agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of opTricon GmbH (“opTricon”), a privately-held Germany based developer and manufacturer of handheld analyzers for rapid diagnostic tests, for $5.5 million in cash, subject to routine post-closing adjustments. Since 2015, the Company and opTricon have been parties to an agreement under which the Company has collaborated in developing its DPP Micro Reader, a handheld, battery-operated analyzer that uses an innovative image sensor to provide, when combined with the Company’s DPP tests, a quantitative interpretation of diagnostic results. The Company purchased opTricon because it believes it will enable it to promote DPP tests and DPP Micro Readers more actively across global markets. The results of opTricon operations have been reflected in the consolidated financial statements since November 6, 2018.

As a result of the consideration paid exceeding the fair value of the net assets acquired, goodwill in the amount of $3,290,888 was recorded in connection with this acquisition, none of which will be deductible for tax purposes. In addition, the Company recorded $2,260,000 in intangible assets associated with the addition of opTricon’s developed technology and customer base. The Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 includes $395,612 and $337,645 of transaction costs related to the opTricon acquisition, respectively.

The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the closing date of November 6, 2018:

  Amount 
Net current assets $404,204 
Property, plant and equipment  125,000 
Goodwill  3,383,112 
Deferred tax liability  (681,112)
Other intangible assets (estimated useful life):    
Developed technology (7 years)  1,900,000 
Customer contracts / relationships (10 years)  360,000 
Total consideration $5,491,204 

The Company calculated the fair value of the fixed assets based on the net book value of opTricon as that approximates fair value. The developed technology and customer contracts/relationships were based on discounted cash flows using management estimates.

The following represents unaudited pro forma operating results for the year ended December 31, 2018 as if the operations of opTricon had been included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations as of January 1, 2018:

  Proforma 
  December 31, 2018 
Total revenues $36,614,995 
     
Net loss $(8,394,074)
     
Net loss per common share $(0.58)
     
Diluted net loss per common share $(0.58)

The pro forma financial information includes business combination accounting effects from the acquisition including amortization charges from acquired intangible assets of opTricon approximately $351,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The unaudited pro forma information as presented above is for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of fiscal 2018. Included in the proforma table above are opTricon’s net revenues and pre-tax loss for the year ended December 31, 2018 which were approximately $2,214,000 and $213,000, respectively. opTricon’s results of operations from the date of acquisition through December 31, 2018 are immaterial to the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

NOTE 32 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:


(a) Basis of Presentation:
(a)Principles of Consolidation:


The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the CompanyChembio and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions and balances arehave been eliminated in consolidation.


The Company’s future working capital needs will depend on many factors, including the rate of its business and revenue growth, the timing of its continuing automation of U.S. manufacturing, and the timing of its investment in research and development as well as sales and marketing. If the Company is unable to increase its revenues and manage its expenses in accordance with its operating plan, it may need to reduce the level or slow the timing of the growth plans contemplated by its operating plan, which would likely curtail or delay the growth in its business contemplated by its operating plan and could impair or defer its ability to achieve profitability and generate cash flow, or to seek to raise additional funds through debt or equity financing, strategic relationships, or other arrangements.

(b)Use of Estimates:


Certain amounts related to other government income in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation of the current period financial statements.

(b) Use of Estimates:

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Judgments and estimates of uncertainties are required in applying the Company’s accounting policies in certain areas. Generally, matters subject to estimation and judgment include accounts receivable realization, inventory obsolescence, asset impairments, recognition of revenue, pursuant to milestones, useful lives of intangible and fixed assets, stock-based compensation, and deferred tax asset valuation allowances. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be based upon amounts that differ from those estimates.


(c) Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

(c)Fair Value of Financial Instruments:


The carrying value for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate fair value due to the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. Included in cash and cash equivalents is $16.0$14.8 million and $4.7$16.0 million as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively, of money market funds that are Level 1 fair value measurements under the hierarchy. The fair value of the Company’s notes payabletotal debt of $20 million (carrying value of $18.2 million) and $20 million (carrying value of $17.6 million) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, is a Level 2 fair value measurement under the hierarchy, and the carrying value approximates the recorded value as the rate is based upon the current rates offered to the Company for similar financial instruments.fair value.


Fair value measurements of all financial assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis are required to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:


Level 1:Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;


Level 2:Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and


Level 3:Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).


(d) Cash and Cash Equivalents:

(d)Cash and Cash Equivalents:


Cash and cash equivalents are defined as short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.less at date of purchase, and include restricted cash of $1 million and $0 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

F-10The Company is contractually obligated to maintain the restricted cash balance on deposit with a bank as security for the bank’s issuance of a guarantee on behalf of the Company for its performance under purchase orders from which the Company received advance payments by a customer. The Company expects that the restriction will be released within the next twelve months..


Credit Risk:

(e)Concentrations of Credit Risk:


Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of temporary cash investments and trade receivables. The Company places its temporary cash instruments with well-known financial institutions and, at times, may maintain balances in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.  The Company monitors the credit ratings of the financial institutions to mitigate this risk.  Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables is principally mitigated by the Company’s ability to obtain letters of credit from certain foreign customers and its diverse customer base, both in number of customers and geographic locations.


F-9

(f)Inventories:

(f) Inventory:

Inventories consisting of material, labor and manufacturing overhead, are stated at the lower of cost andor net realizable value. Cost isvalue with cost being determined onusing a standard cost method, which approximates average cost. Average cost consists primarily of material, labor and manufacturing overhead expenses (including fixed production-overhead costs). The Company analyzes its inventory levels quarterly and writes down, in the first-in, first-out method.applicable period, inventory that has become obsolete, inventory that has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value and inventory in excess of expected customer demand. The Company’s policy isCompany also writes off, in the applicable period, the costs related to periodically evaluate the market valueexpired inventory. Costs of the inventory and the stage of product life cycle, and record a write-down for any inventory considered slow moving or obsolete.purchased inventories are recorded using weighted-average costing.


(g) Fixed Assets:

(g)Fixed Assets:


Fixed assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, which range from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the useful life of the asset or the lease term, whichever is shorter. Deposits paid for fixed assets are capitalized and not depreciated until the related asset is placed in service.


(h) Valuation of Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets:

(h)License Agreements:

The Company records up-front payments related to license agreements as prepaids and amortizes them over their respective economic life. As of  December 31, 2019 and 2018, total prepaids were $100,000 and $100,000, respectively.

Amortization expenses for the licenses above for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018 were $0, and $0, respectively.


(i)Valuation of Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets:


Long-lived assets to be held and used are analyzed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The Company evaluates at each balance sheet date whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate possible impairment. If there are indications of impairment, the Company uses future undiscounted cash flows of the related asset or asset grouping over the remaining life in measuring whether the assets are recoverable.  In the event such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the recorded asset values, the assets are written down to their estimated fair value. NoNaN impairment of long-lived tangible and intangible assets was recorded for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018.2019.


(i) Revenue Recognition:

(j)Revenue Recognition:

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued converged guidance on recognizing revenue in contracts with customers, Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The intent of the new standard is to improve financial reporting and comparability of revenue globally. The core principle of the standard is for a company to recognize revenue in a manner that depicts the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration which the company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. Other major provisions include capitalization of certain contract costs, consideration of the time value of money in the transaction price, and in certain circumstances, allowing estimates of variable consideration to be recognized before contingencies are resolved. The guidance also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entity’s contracts with customers.

The new revenue standards became effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and were adopted using the modified retrospective method. The adoption of the new revenue standards as of January 1, 2018 did not change the Company’s revenue recognition as its revenues continue to be recognized when the customer takes control of its product. As the Company did not identify any material accounting changes that impacted the amount of reported revenues with respect to its product revenue, license and royalty revenue, and R&D, milestone and grant revenues, no adjustment to retained earnings was required upon adoption.


The Company adoptedrecognizes revenue when the standards to contracts that were not completed at the date of initial application (January 1, 2018).

Under the new revenue standards, the Company recognizes revenues when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The Company recognizes revenuesrevenue following the five-step model prescribed under ASU No.Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09: (i) identify contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenuesrevenue when (or as) the Company satisfies the performance obligation.


Product RevenuesRevenue


RevenuesRevenue from product sales are recognized and commissions are accrued when the customer obtains control of the Company’s product, which occurs at a point in time, typically upon tendering the product to the customer. The Company expenses incremental costs of obtaining a contract as and when incurred because the expected amortization period of the asset that it would have recognized is one year or less or the amount is immaterial. Freight and distribution activities on products are performed afterwhen the customer obtains control of the goods. The Company has made an accounting policy election to account for shipping and handling activities that occur either when or after goods are tendered to the customer as a fulfillment activity, and therefore recognizes freight and distribution expenses in Costcost of Product Sales.product sales. The Company excludes certain taxes from the transaction price (e.g., sales, value added and some excise taxes).


Our The Company’s contracts with customers often include promises to transfer products or services to a customer. Determining whether products and services are considered distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately versus together may require judgment. Typical products sold are diagnostic tests and typical services performed are R&D feasibility studies. Revenues from sale of productsproduct  sales are recognized at a point-in-time and revenues from R&D feasibility studies are recognized ratably, over the period of the agreement.agreement, unless the related performance obligations indicate otherwise.


Judgement Judgment is required to determine the stand-alone selling price (“SSP”) for each distinct performance obligation. SSP is directly observable and wethe Company can use a range of amounts to estimate SSP, as we sellit sells products and services separately, and can determine whether there is a discount to be allocated based on the relative SSP of the various products and services, for the various geographies. The Company currently does not have agreements in which multiple performance obligations are sold combined.
The Company’s payment terms vary by the type and location of the Company’s customer and products or services offered. Payment terms differ by jurisdiction and customer but payment is generally required in a term ranging from 30 to 60 days from date of shipment or satisfaction of the performance obligation.
Reserves for Discounts and Allowances


RevenuesRevenue from product sales are recorded net of reserves established for applicable discounts and allowances that are offered within contracts with the Company’s customers. The Company’s process for estimating reserves established for these variable consideration components does not differ materially from its historical practices.


Product revenue reserves, which are classified as a reduction in product revenues,revenue, are generally related to discounts.discounts and returns. Estimates of variable consideration and the determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based on all information (historical, current and forecasted) that is reasonably available to the Company, taking into consideration the type of customer, the type of transaction, market events and trends, and the specific facts and circumstances of each arrangement. The transaction price, which includes variable consideration reflecting the impact of discounts, allowances and allowances,returns may be subject to constraint and is included in the net sales price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of the amount of the cumulative revenuesrevenue recognized will not occur in a future period. Actual amounts may ultimately differ from the Company’s estimates. If actual results vary, the Company adjusts these estimates, which could have an effect on revenue and earnings in the period of adjustment.


License and Royalty Revenues


The Company receives royalty revenuesrevenue on sales by its licensee of products covered under patents that itthe Company owns. The Company does not have future performance obligations under this license arrangement. The Company records these revenuesrevenue based on estimates of the sales that occurred during the relevant period as a component of license and royalty revenues.revenue. The relevant period estimates of sales are based on interim data provided by the licensee and analysis of historical royalties that have been paid to the Company, adjusted for any changes in facts and circumstances, as appropriate. Differences between actual and estimated royalty revenuesrevenue are adjusted for in the period in which they become known, typically the following quarter. Historically, adjustments have not been material when compared to actual amounts paid by licensee.licensees.


R&D and grant revenueRevenue


All such contracts with customers are evaluated under the five-step model described above.  Such contracts are further described in Note 7 -  Revenue. Grants are invoiced and revenue is recognized ratably as that is the depiction of the timing of the transfer of services. The R&D study, which encompasses various phases of product development processes: design feasibility & planning, product development and design optimization, design verification, design validation and process validation, and pivotal studies, is also recognized ratably.

For certain contracts that represent non-governmental grants where the funder does not meet the definition of a customer, the Company recognizes revenue when earned in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 958.

Government  Grant Income

Chembio often receives government grants in support of R&D activities that are not associated with a customer-vendor relationship and therefore falls outside the scope of ASC 958. Such contracts are further described606. Because there is no authoritative guidance under Disaggregation of Revenue, below. Grants are invoiced and revenue is recognized ratably as that is the depiction of the timing of the transfer of services. Performance obligation is the feasibility study which encompasses various phases of product development processes: design feasibility & planning, product development & design optimization, design verification, design validation & process validation, and pivotal studies.

U.S. GAAP on accounting for government grants received, Chembio applies Topic 958 - Not-for-profit entities guidance by analogy. In June 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)(the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)ASU 2018-08, Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958): Clarifying the Scope and the Accounting Guidance for Contributions Received and Contributions Made. This ASU clarifies the guidance presented in ASC Topic 958, “Not-for-Profit Entities,” of the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) for evaluating whether a transaction is reciprocal (i.e., an exchange transaction) or nonreciprocalnon reciprocal (i.e., a contribution) and for distinguishing between conditional and unconditional contributions. The ASU also clarifiesclarified the guidance used by entities other than not-for-profits to identify and account for contributions made. Government grants are invoiced and revenue is recognized as milestones are achieved, conditions are removed and approval from grantor is obtained.

Disaggregation of Revenue

The following tables disaggregate Total Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019, by type of transaction and by geography:

  
Exchange
Transactions
  
Non-Exchange
Transactions
  Total 
Net product sales $28,844,997  $  $28,844,997 
R&D, milestone and grant revenue  3,321,031   1,359,251   4,680,282 
License and royalty revenue  938,753      938,753 
  $33,104,781  $1,359,251  $34,464,032 

Exchange transactions are recognized in accordance with ASC 606, while non-exchange transactions are recognized in accordance with ASU No. 2018-08.

  Total 
Africa $7,564,360 
Asia  888,800 
Europe & Middle East  6,498,995 
Latin America  11,808,768 
United States  7,703,109 
  $34,464,032 

The following tables disaggregate Total Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018, by type of transaction and by geography:

  
Exchange
Transactions
  
Non-Exchange
Transactions
  Total 
Net product sales $27,913,209  $  $27,913,209 
R&D, milestone and grant revenue  2,687,210   3,032,248   5,719,458 
License and royalty revenue  948,773      948,773 
  $34,581,440  $3,032,248  $34,581,440 

Exchange transactions are recognized in accordance with ASC 606, while non-exchange transactions are recognized in accordance with ASU No. 2018-08.

  Total 
Africa $8,838,632 
Asia  1,404,982 
Europe & Middle East  4,895,273 
Latin America  12,546,083 
United States  6,896,470 
  $34,581,440 


Contract Liabilities


Deferred revenue relates to payments received in advance of performance under the contract. Deferred revenue is recognized as revenue as (or when) the Company performs under the contract. At December 31, 2018,2019, the Company reported $422,905$0.1 million in deferred revenue of which $422,905$0.1 million was earned and recognized as R&D, milestone and grant revenue during the year ended December 31, 2019.2020. At December 31, 2019,2020, the Company reported $125,000$1.6 in deferred revenue, in which $0.8 million is expected to be recognized during the first quarter of 2020.

In April 2017,three months ending March 31, 2021 and the Company entered into a $1.1 million agreement with FIND to develop a simple, point-of-care fever panel assay that can  identify multiple life-threatening acute febrile illnesses commonremainder in the Asia Pacific region. The Company earned $0.2 million and $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, and from inception through December 31, 2019, respectively as R&D, milestone and grant revenue in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.next twelve months.


In August 2016,July 2020, the Company was awarded a grant of $5.9$0.6 million from BARDA which is part of the U.S. Department of Health And Human Resources to develop a rapid Zika virus assay.SARS-CoV-2 Ag System. The Company earned $0.6 million and $5.9$0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 201931,2020 and was recorded as government grant income.

In December 2020, the Company was awarded a grant of $12.7 million from inception throughBARDA to support the development and pursuit of FDA EUA for a rapid, multiplex DPP Respiratory Antigen Panel point-of-care test system. The Company earned $1.6 million for the year ended December 31,2020 and was recorded as government grant income..

(j) Loss Per Share:

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of the Company assumed to be outstanding during the period of computation. Diluted loss per share is computed using the treasury stock method if the additional shares are dilutive. For all periods presented, basic and diluted loss per share are the same as any additional shares would be anti-dilutive.

There were 603,531 and 545,986 restricted shares awards outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, as R&D, milestone and grant revenuethat were not included in the Company’s Consolidated Statementscalculation of Operations.diluted loss per share for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. There were 974,778 and 642,625 options outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 respectively, that were not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.


(k) Research and Development:

(k)Research and Development:


Research and developmentDevelopment (R&D) include product development, program management, clinical trials and regulatory costs and are expensed aswhen incurred. Advance payments for goods and services that will be used in future research and development activities are expensed when the activity has been performed or when the goods have been received rather than when the payment is made.


(l) Stock-Based Compensation:

(l)Stock-Based Compensation:


The Company grants share options to employees, non-employee members of the Company’s board of directors and non-employee consultants as compensation for services performed. Employee and non-employee members of the board of directors’ awards of share-based compensation are accounted for in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, or ASC 718. ASC 718 requires all share-based payments to employees and non-employee directors, including grants of share options, to be recognized in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss based on their grant date fair values.

Using this model, fair value is calculated based on assumptions with respect to (i) the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date; (ii) expected volatility of the Company’s common stock price, (iii) the periods of time over which the optionees are expected to hold their options prior to exercise (expected term), (iv) expected dividend yield on the Company’s common stock, and (v) risk-free interest rates.

The grant date fair value of share options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The fair value of restricted stock and performance/restricted stock unit awards are their fair valuedetermined on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation expense for stock optionsgrant or the date of issuance, as applicable.

The expected volatility is calculated based on historical data of the Company’s common stock. The expected dividend yield is zero as the Company has never paid dividends and does not currently anticipate paying any in the foreseeable future. Risk-free interest rates are based on quoted U.S. Treasury rates for securities with maturities approximating the option’s expected term. The expected term of share options granted to the optionees is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation modelexpected life of the option.

Stock based on awards ultimately expected to vest together with the fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards, are,compensation is reduced for actual forfeitures in the period in which the forfeiture occurs and expensedgenerally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the grant. During 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”.


(m) Income Taxes:

(m)
Income Taxes:


The Company accounts for income taxes under an asset and liability approach that recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.


The Company follows a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return. The guidance relates to, among other things, classification, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions, and disclosure requirements. Any interest and penalties accrued related to uncertain tax positions are recorded in tax expense.


The Company assesses the realizability of its net deferred tax assets on an annual basis. If, after considering all relevant positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized, the Company will reduce the net deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance. The realization of net deferred tax assets is dependent on several factors, including the generation of sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of net operating loss carryforwards.


(n) Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets:

(n)Loss Per Share:

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period including outstanding restricted stock that by its terms is includible in the calculation. Diluted loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018 reflects the potential dilution from the exercise or conversion of other securities into common stock, if dilutive.

There were 666,197, and 732,906 options outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which were not included in the calculation of diluted income per share for the years ended because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.


(o)Goodwill and Intangible Assets:


Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price the Company paid over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the Company’s acquisition of opTricon in November 2018, Chembio Diagnostics Malaysia in January 2017 and Orangelife in November 2019.acquisition. Goodwill is not amortized but rather is tested annually as of the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter, or sooner if the Company believes that indicators of impairment exist. The Company makes a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment, which is based on a number of applicable factors. If the Company concludes that it is more likely than not that the carrying value of the applicable reporting unit is greater than its fair value, then it would recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, provided the impairment charge does not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.


ForIndefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually during the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter of the year, ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, there was no impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets.

Following is a table that reflectswhen events or changes in Goodwill:

Beginning balance January 1, 2019 $4,983,127 
Acquisition of Orangelife  986,058 
Chembio Diagnostics GmbH measurement period adjustment  (99,648)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rate  3,153
 
Balance at December 31, 2019 $5,872,690 

Intangiblecircumstances indicate the assets consistmight be impaired. Impairment is indicated when the carrying value of the following at:intangible asset exceeds its fair value.



 
Weighted Average
Remaining Life
 
December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
Cost  
Accumulated
Amortization
  
Net
Book Value
  Cost  
Accumulated
Amortization
  
Net
Book Value
 
Intellectual property  6  $1,418,681  $299,232  $1,119,449  $1,089,688  $173,633  $916,055 
Developed technology  6   1,922,682   266,550   1,656,132   1,910,315      1,910,315 
Customer contracts/relationships  7   1,325,521   270,902   1,054,619   1,121,600   151,929   969,671 
Trade names  8   114,946   30,794   84,152   108,521   19,731   88,790 
      $4,781,830  $867,478  $3,914,352  $4,230,124  $345,293  $3,884,831 


Amortization expense(o) Allowance for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $515,263 and $233,734, respectively, and is recorded within COGS, R&D and Selling, General and Administrative expenses. Amortization expense, subject to changes in currency exchange rates, is expected to be approximately $590,000 per year from 2020 through 2024, and total $1 million for all of the years thereafter.Doubtful Accounts:


(p)Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:


The Company records allowances for doubtful accounts for the estimated probable losses on uncollectible accounts receivable. The allowance is based upon the credit worthiness of the Company’s customers, the Company’s historical experience, the age of the receivable and current market and economic conditions. Receivables are written off against these allowances in the period they are determined to be uncollectible.


(p) Acquisition Costs:

(q)Acquisition Costs:


Acquisition costs are expensed when incurred and include period expenses, primarily professional services, related to acquisition activities.


(q) Foreign Currency Translation:

(r)Foreign Currency Translation:


The functional currency of a foreign subsidiary is the local currency. Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries that use a currency other than U.S. dollars as their functional currency are translated to U.S. dollars at end of period currency exchange rates. The consolidated statements of operations of foreign subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars at average period currency exchange rates. The effect of translation for foreign subsidiaries is generally reported in other comprehensive income. Foreign transaction gains/losses are immaterial.


(r) Leases:

The Company accounts for leases in accordance with ASC 842. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at contract inception. A lease exists when a contract conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. The definition of a lease embodies two conditions: (1) there is an identified asset in the contract that is land or a depreciable asset (i.e., property, plant, and equipment), and (2) the Company has the right to control the use of the identified asset. The Company accounts for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease component.

From time to time the Company enters into direct financing lease arrangements that include a lessee obligation to purchase the leased asset at the end of the lease term, a bargain purchase option, or provides for minimum lease payments with a present value of 90% or more of the fair value of the leased asset at the date of lease inception.

Operating leases where the Company is the lessee are included in right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease obligations are included on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The lease obligations are initially and subsequently measured at the present value of the unpaid lease payments at the lease commencement date and subsequent reporting periods.

F-13

(s)Recent Accounting Pronouncements Affecting the Company:

Finance leases where the Company is the lessee are included in ROU assets and lease obligations on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The lease obligations are initially measured in the same manner as for operating leases and are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

Key estimates and judgments include how the Company determined (1) the discount rate used to discount the unpaid lease payments to present value, (2) lease term and (3) lease payments. ASC 842 requires a lessee to discount its unpaid lease payments using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, its incremental borrowing rate. As most of the Company’s leases where it is the lessee do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The Company’s incremental borrowing rate for a lease is the rate of interest it would have to pay on a collateralized basis to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments under similar terms. The Company uses the implicit rate when readily determinable.

The lease term for all of the Company’s leases includes the non-cancellable period of the lease plus any additional periods covered by either a lessee option to extend (or not to terminate) the lease that is reasonably certain to be exercised, or an option to extend (or not to terminate) the lease controlled by the lessor.

The ROU asset is initially measured at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for lease payments made at or before the lease commencement date less any lease incentives received. For operating leases, the ROU asset is subsequently measured throughout the lease term at the carrying amount of the lease liability, minus any accrued lease payments, less the unamortized balance of lease incentives received. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

For finance leases, the ROU asset is subsequently amortized using the straight-line method from the lease commencement date to the earlier of the end of its useful life or the end of the lease term unless the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset, or the Company is reasonably certain to exercise an option to purchase the underlying asset. In those cases, the ROU asset is amortized over the useful life of the underlying asset. Amortization of the ROU asset is recognized and presented separately from interest expense on the lease liability.

The Company has elected not to recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities for all short-term leases that have a lease term of 12 months or less at lease commencement. Lease payments associated with short-term leases are recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

(s) Recent Accounting Pronouncements Affecting the Company:

Recently Adopted

ASU 2020-10, Codification Improvements

In February 2016,November 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 requires the entity to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leased assets. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting expense recognition2020-10, which clarifies various topics in the income statement. In July 2018ASC, including the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvementsaddition of existing disclosure requirements to Topic 842, Leases,the relevant disclosure sections. This update improves consistency by amending the ASC to include all disclosure guidance in the appropriate disclosure sections and ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842) Targeted Improvements, which provide supplemental adoptionclarifies application of various provisions in the ASC by amending and adding new headings, cross referencing to other guidance, and clarification to ASU 2016-02, and must be adopted concurrently with the adoption of ASU 2016-02, cumulatively referred to as “Topic 842”. Topic 842 was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2019, with early adoption permitted, and was applied using either a modified retrospective approach,refining or an optional transition method which allows an entity to apply the new standard at the adoption date with a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption.

As further discussed on Note 12(c) – Leases, the Company adopted Topic 842 on January 1, 2019 under the optional transition method and elected the short-term lease exception and available practical expedients. Under the transition method, the Company did not adjust its comparative period financial information or make the new required lease disclosures for periods before the effective date. The impact of adoption of right-of-use assets and liabilities on January 1, 2019 was $0.8 million, and $0.8 million, respectively.

In March 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance under ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 provides for simplification of several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows.correcting terminology. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017. Ashas evaluated the Company has a full valuation allowance against its U.S. net deferred tax assets, the adoptioneffects of this standard for recognition ofand determined that the tax effect of deductions for employee share awards in excess of compensation costs (“windfall”) did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. See Note 8 – Income Taxes, for additional information. Should the full valuation allowance be reversed in future periods, the adoption of this new guidance could introduce more volatility in the calculation of the Company’s effective tax rate, depending on the Company’s share price at exercise or vesting of share-based awards as compared to grant date. The other provisions of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which provides guidance related to cash flows presentation. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 in the first quarter of 2018. The guidance in ASU 2016-15 is generally consistent with the Company’s current cash flow classifications, and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


F-17ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”)


In January 2017,June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill2016-13. ASU 2016-13 provides guidance on measurement of credit losses on financial instruments that changes the impairment model for most financial assets and Other (Topic 350): Simplifyingcertain other instruments, including trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities and loans, and that requires entities to use a new, forward-looking “expected loss” model that is expected to generally result in the Testearlier recognition of allowances for Goodwill Impairment, which requires an entity to no longer perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill impairment. Instead, impairment will be measured using the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the reporting unit. This update will be effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.losses. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 in the fourth quarter of 2017. The adoptionstandard effective January 1, 2020 and has evaluated the effects of this standard and determined that the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.statements.


ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement - Disclosure Framework (Topic 820) (“ASU 2018-13”)

In May 2017,August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting, to provide clarity to which changes to2018-13. ASU 2018-13 improves the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The updated guidance became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 including interim periods within those years. The Company adopted ASU 2017-09 in the first quarterstandard effective January 1, 2020 and has evaluated the effects of 2018. Adoptionthis standard and determined that the adoption did not have a material effectimpact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


ASU 2017-4, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-4”)

In JulyJanuary 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features2017-4. ASU 2017-4 simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill and Replacement ofeliminates Step 2 from the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. Part I of thisgoodwill impairment test. ASU addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. Per the ASU, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. The ASU2017-4 is effective for public entities for fiscal yearsannual and interim goodwill tests beginning after December 15, 2018 and the2019. The Company adopted itthe standard effective January 1, 2019. This ASU is applicable to2020 and has evaluated the stock warrants issued as parteffects of this standard and determined that the Credit Agreement, as further discussed in Note 14 – Warrants.adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-08Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958): Clarifying the Scope and the Accounting Guidance for Contributions Received and Contributions Made to clarify the accounting guidance related to contributions made or received. This guidance primarily affects not-for-profit entities, although it also applies to businesses to the extent that they make or receive contributions, including grants. ASU 2018-08 clarifies and improves the scope and accounting guidance for both contributions received and made in order to assist entities in evaluating if those transactions should be accounted for as contributions under the scope of Topic 958, or as an exchange transaction subject to other guidance. Public entities are required to apply the amendments on contributions received and contributions made to annual periods beginning after June 15, 2018, and December 15, 2018, respectively, each including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, and the Company adopted ASU 2018-08 effective as of January 1, 2018. The impact of adoption was immaterial.Not Yet Adopted


In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.Taxes

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12. This standard simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the guidance in Topic 740 related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The new guidance also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill and allocating consolidated income taxes to separate financial statements of entities not subject to income tax. ASU 2019-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. Upon adoption, the Company must apply certain aspects of this standard retrospectively for all periods presented while other aspects are applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company is currently evaluatingwill adopt the standard effective January 1, 2021 and has determined that the adoption will not have a material impact of this new standard on itsthe Company’s consolidated financial statements.


ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting

In June 2016,March 2020, the FASB issued a new standardASC Topic 848. ASC Topic 848 provides relief for impacted areas as it relates to replace the incurred loss impairment methodology under currentimpending reference rate reform. ASC Topic 848 contains optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP with a methodologyto debt arrangements, contracts, hedging relationships, and other areas or transactions that reflects expected credit lossesare impacted by reference rate reform. This guidance is effective upon issuance for all entities and requires considerationelections of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. We will becertain optional expedients are required to useapply the provisions of the guidance. The Company will adopt the standard effective January 1, 2021 and has determined that the adoption will not have a forward-looking expected credit loss modelmaterial impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2020-06 - Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for accounts receivables, loans,Convertible Instruments and otherContracts in an Entity’s Own Equity
20

On August 5, 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, which simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments. Credit losses relatinginstruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity, including convertible instruments and contracts on an entity’s own equity. The ASU is part of the FASB’s simplification initiative, which aims to available-for-salereduce unnecessary complexity in U.S. GAAP. ASU 2020-06 simplifies the guidance in U.S. GAAP on the issuer’s accounting for convertible debt securities will also be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a reductioninstruments, requires entities to provide expanded disclosures about “the terms and features of convertible instruments” and how the instruments have been reported in the amortized cost basisentity’s financial statements. It also removes from ASC 815-40-25-10 certain conditions for equity classification and amends certain guidance in ASC 260 on the computation of EPS for convertible instruments and contracts on an entity’s own equity. An entity can use either a full or modified retrospective approach to adopt the securities.ASU’s guidance. The standard will beASU’s amendments are effective for ussmaller public business entities fiscal years beginning July 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted beginning July 1, 2019. Adoptionafter December 15, 2023. The Company continues to assess all potential impact of the standard and will be applied usingdisclose the nature and reason for any elections that the Company makes.

NOTE 3 — ACQUISITIONS:

Orangelife

On November 25, 2019, pursuant to a modified retrospective approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings asquota purchase agreement, the Company acquired all of the effective dateoutstanding shares of Orangelife Comercio e Industria Ltda., or Orangelife, a privately-held Brazilian company, which is an original equipment manufacturer of point-of-care tests approved by the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, or ANVISA) for infectious diseases that include HIV, Hepatitis C, Zika, Chikungunya, and Dengue Fever. Orangelife tests are manufactured in its Rio de Janeiro facility, which is ISO-certified and approved by ANVISA to align our credit loss methodology withproduce Class II/III/IV medical devices. The purchase price includes the new standard. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard in our consolidated financial statements, including accounting policies, processes, and systems.following consideration:


$150,000 in cash and 153,707 shares of common stock.
Issuance of 316,456 shares of common stock to the founder and former chief executive officer of Orangelife, based on the transfer and approval of registration of certain of the Company’s products in Brazil prior to November 25, 2022. All of the shares may be deliverable in the event of change in control of Chembio. The number of shares issued was subject to adjustments based upon Orangelife’s working capital at closing. The fair value of the shares on the date of the acquisition was recorded in equity and was valued at $1.2 million.

The purchase consideration is subject to routine post-closing adjustments and has been finalized as of December 31, 2020. The acquisition of Orangelife will allow us to expand our commercial presence by offering our products to the state, private, and pharmacy markets in Brazil, in addition to providing local support to our long time customer Bio-Manguinhos, the subsidiary of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz) that oversees development and production of vaccines, diagnostics, and biopharmaceuticals, primarily to meet the demands of Brazil’s national public health system. The results of Orangelife’s operations have been reflected in the consolidated financial statements since November 25, 2019.

The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the closing date of November 25, 2019:

 Amount 
Net current assets $320,293 
Property, plant and equipment and other assets  226,035 
Inventory  289,205 
Goodwill  986,058 
Deferred tax liability  (50,000)
Other intangible assets (estimated useful life):    
Trade name (0.5 years)
  5,000 
Customer contracts / relationships (5 years)  195,000 
Total consideration $1,971,591 

The Company calculated the fair value of the property, plant and equipment based on the net book value of Orangelife as that approximates fair value. The estimated fair value of the trade name, customer contracts/relationships and contingent earnouts were based on discounted cash flows using management estimates.

As a result of the consideration paid exceeding the fair value of the net assets acquired, goodwill in the amount of $986,058 was recorded in connection with this acquisition, none of which will be deductible for tax purposes. In addition, the Company recorded $200,000 in intangible assets associated with the addition of Orangelife’s trade name and customer base.

The following represents unaudited pro forma operating results for the year ended December 31, 2019 as if the operations of Orangelife had been included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations as of January 1, 2019. This pro forma financial information is unaudited and presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have occurred if the acquisition of Orangelife and the other transactions contemplated by this acquisition had been completed as of January 1, 2019, nor is it necessarily indicative of the future operating results of Chembio Diagnostics and Orangelife on a combined and consolidated basis.

 
Unaudited Proforma
December 31, 2019
 
Total revenues $35,157,248 
     
Net loss $(13,654,001)
     
Net loss per common share (basic and diluted) $(0.80)


NOTE 4 — INVENTORIES:


InventoriesNet inventories consist of the following at December 31, 2019:31:


 December 31  December 31 
 2019 2018  2020  2019 
Raw Materials $2,901,319  $2,803,677  $5,955,215  $2,901,319 
Work in Process  793,343   263,043   2,549,516   793,343 
Finished Goods  5,903,368   4,784,502   4,011,671   5,903,368 
 $9,598,030  $7,851,222  $12,516,402  $9,598,030 



NOTE 5 — FIXED ASSETS:


Fixed assets consist of the following at December 31, 2019:31:


 December 31  December 31 
 2019  2018  2020  2019 
Machinery and Equipment $7,955,511  $6,070,137  $10,996,869  $7,955,511 
Furniture and Fixtures 21,477  35,287   25,418   21,477 
Computer Equipment 416,359  435,348   446,300   416,359 
Leasehold Improvements 3,038,469  2,334,512   3,158,074   3,038,469 
Enterprise Business Systems 1,830,925  462,420   2,741,806   1,830,925 
Subtotal:  17,368,467   13,262,741 
Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization  (7,329,173)  (6,463,784)  (8,680,064)  (7,329,172)
 $5,933,569  $2,873,920  $8,688,403  $5,933,569 


Depreciation expense for the 20192020 and 20182019 years totaled $933,558$1,227,860 and $634,261,$933,558, respectively.


As of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the Company has purchased manufacturing equipment that is not yet in use and therefore has not been depreciated, aggregating $3,011,273 and $1,400,181, and $428,859, respectively.


NOTE 6 — ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES:


Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of the following at December 31, 2019:31:


 December 31  December 31 
 2019  2018  2020  2019 
Accounts Payable - suppliers $3,144,098  $3,622,765  $5,727,781  $3,144,098 
Accrued Commissions & Royalties 931,760  867,344   807,708   931,760 
Accrued Payroll 231,753  48,867   277,908   231,753 
Accrued Vacation 410,199  264,789   417,238   410,199 
Accrued Bonuses 215,000  494,318   1,193,985   215,000 
Accrued Professional Fees  511,681   0 
Accrued Expenses - Other  593,433   590,598   1,106,489   593,433 
 $5,526,243  $5,888,681  $10,042,790  $5,526,243 
NOTE 7 — DEFERRED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT REVENUE:


Deferred Revenue

The Company recognizes income from R&D milestones when those milestones are reached and non-milestone contracts and grants when earned.  These projects are invoiced after expenses are incurred. Any projects or grants funded in advance are deferred until earned.

From time to time the Company may receive prepayment from customers for products to be manufactured and shipped at future dates. Customer payments in advance of the applicable performance obligation are deferred and recognized in accordance with ASC 606.

As of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, there were $125,000$1,606,997 and $422,905$125,000 unearned advanced revenues, respectively.


Disaggregation of Revenue

The following tables disaggregates total revenues for the period ending December 31, 2020:

 
Exchange
Transactions
  
Non-Exchange
Transactions
  Total 
Net product sales $24,767,149  $0  $24,767,149 
R&D revenue  4,851,562   0   4,851,562 
Government grant income  0   2,018,924   2,018,924 
License and royalty revenue  832,562   0   832,562 
  $30,451,273  $2,018,924  $32,470,197 

Exchange transactions are recognized in accordance with ASC 606, while non-exchange transactions are recognized in accordance with ASU 2018-08.

The following tables disaggregates total revenues for the period ending December 31, 2020 by region:

  Total 
Africa $4,890,370 
Asia  824,488 
Europe & Middle East  9,905,437 
Latin America  9,841,773 
United States  7,008,129 
  $32,470,197 

The following tables disaggregates total revenues for the period ending December 31, 2019:

 
Exchange
Transactions
  
Non-Exchange
Transactions
  Total 
Net product sales $28,844,997  $0  $28,844,997 
R&D revenue  3,321,031   704,507   4,025,538 
Government grant income  0   654,744   654,744 
License and royalty revenue  938,753   0   938,753 
  $33,104,781  $1,359,251  $34,464,032 

Exchange transactions are recognized in accordance with ASC 606, while non-exchange transactions are recognized in accordance with ASU 2018-08.

The following tables disaggregates total revenues for the period ending December 31, 2019 by region:

  Total 
Africa $7,564,360 
Asia  888,800 
Europe & Middle East  6,498,995 
Latin America  11,808,768 
United States  7,703,109 
  $34,464,032 


NOTE 8 — INCOME TAXES:


The components of (loss) before income taxes consisted of the following:


 Year Ending December 31, 
  2020  2019 
United States operations $(23,384,133) $(12,504,780)
International operations  (2,593,989)  (1,670,641)
(Loss) before taxes $(25,978,122) $(14,175,421)

  Year Ending December 31, 
  2019  2018 
United States operations $(12,504,780) $(7,137,428)
International operations  (1,670,641)  (795,742)
(Loss) before taxes $(14,175,421) $(7,933,170)

The (benefit from) provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 is comprised of the following:


 Year Ending December 31,  Year Ending December 31, 
 2019 2018  2020  2019 
Current           
Federal $  $  $(66,906) $0 
State  9,790   10,911   6,497   9,790 
Foreign  3,633      0   3,633 
Total current (benefit) provision  13,423   10,911   (60,409)  13,423 
                
Deferred                
Federal        0   0 
State        0   0 
Foreign  (513,715)  (78,435)  (396,385)  (513,715)
Total deferred (benefit) provision  (513,715)  (78,435)  (396,385)  (513,715)
                
Total (benefit) provision $(500,292) $(67,521) $(456,794) $(500,292)


A reconciliation of the Federal statutory rate to the effective rate applicable to loss before income taxes is as follows:


 Year Ending December 31,  Year Ending December 31, 
 2019  2018  2020  2019 
Federal income tax at statutory rates 21.00% 21.00%  21.00%  21.00%
State income taxes, net of federal benefit (0.05)% (0.10)%  (0.02)%  (0.05)%
Nondeductible expenses (1.00)% (1.58)%  (0.19)%  (1.00)%
Foreign rate differential 0.45% 0.36%  0.47%  0.45%
Change in valuation allowance (17.51)% (18.44)%  (19.37)%  (17.51)%
Other  0.64%  (0.39)%  (0.13)%  0.64%
Income tax benefit  3.53
%  0.85%  1.76%  3.53%


In January 2018, the FASB released guidance on the accounting for tax on the global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) provisions of the Tax Act. The GILTI provisions impose a tax on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. The guidance allows companies to make an accounting policy election to either (1) account for GILTI as a component of tax expense in the period in which they are subject to the rules (the period cost method), or (ii) account for GILTI in the Company’s measurement of deferred taxes (the deferred method). After completing the analysis of the GILTI provisions, the Company elected to account for GILTI using the period cost method.

The Company had an ownership change as described in Internal Revenue Code Sec. 382 during 2004 (“2004 change”). As a result, the Company’s net operating losses prior to the 2004 change of $5,832,516 were subject to an annual limitation of $150,608 and for the first five (5) years are entitled to a BIG (Built-In-Gains) of $488,207 per year. These net operating losses expire in 2020 through 2024.


The Company had a second ownership change during 2006 (“2006 change”). The net operating losses incurred between the 2004 change and the 2006 change of $8,586,861 were subject to an annual limitation of $1,111,831 and for the first five (5) years are entitled to a BIG of $1,756,842 per year. These net operating losses expire in 2024 through 2026.


After applying the above limitations, at December 31, 2019,2020, the Company has post-change net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $27,235,49427,001,828 which expire between 20202021 and 2037 and $16,242,68335,840,768 which do not expire. In addition, the Company has research and development tax credit carryforwards of approximately $1,679,4951,696,870 for the year ended December 31, 20192020, which expire between 20202021 and 2036.


The Company has state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1,912,798$3,511,090 which generally expire between 2035 and 2039. The Company has foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $3,355,645$5,598,852 which generally expire between 2025 and 2026.


 2019 2018  2020  2019 
Inventory reserves $196,193  $204,206  $461,709  $196,193 
Accrued expenses  105,323   175,168   130,291   105,323 
Net operating loss carry-forwards  10,079,317   7,122,576   14,844,798   10,079,317 
Research and development credit  1,679,495   1,696,870   1,696,870   1,679,495 
Stock-based compensation  581,053   215,797   398,900   581,053 
  602,187   0 
Lease obligations
  1,646,584
      1,583,814   1,646,584 
Depreciation  44,993   139,362   0   44,993 
Total deferred tax assets  14,332,958   9,553,979   19,718,569   14,332,958 
                
Right-of-use assets
  (1,538,129
)
     (1,340,914)  (1,538,129)
Depreciation  (254,366)  0 
Intangibles  (921,807)  (968,849)  (821,363)  (921,807)
Total deferred tax liabilities  (2,459,936)  (968,849)  (2,416,643)  (2,459,936)
      
         
Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance  11,873,022   8,585,130   17,301,926   11,873,022 
Less valuation allowances  (12,339,348)  (9,477,438)  (17,371,867)  (12,339,348)
Net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities $(466,326) $(892,308) $(69,941) $(466,326)


The Company does not provide for U.S. income taxes on unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries as its present intention is to reinvest the unremitted earnings in the Company’s foreign operations. At December 31, 20192020 there were no0 unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries.


Interest and penalties, if any, related to income tax liabilities are included in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2019,2020, the Company does not have a liability for uncertain tax positions.


The Company files Federal and state income tax returns, Chembio Germany files in Germany, Chembio Brazil files in Brazil and Chembio Malaysia files in Malaysia and has been on tax holiday which expired on December 31, 2018. With few exceptions, tax years for fiscal 2016 2017 through 2019 2020are open and potentially subject to examination by federal, state and foreign taxing authorities.


On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, (“CARES Act”), was enacted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act, among other things, permits NOL carryovers and carrybacks to offset 100% of taxable income for taxable years beginning before 2021. In addition, the CARES Act allows NOLs incurred in tax years 2018, 2019, and 2020 to be carried back to each of the five preceding taxable years.  In addition to the NOL changes, the CARES Act contains modifications on the limitation of business interest for tax years beginning in 2019 and 2020. The modifications to Section 163(j) increase the allowable business interest deduction from 30% of adjusted taxable income to 50% of adjusted taxable income. This modification did not effect the Company’s interest expense limitation. Overall the CARES ACT did not have a significant impact on the Company since it maintains a full valuation allowance.

NOTE 9 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:



(a)Common Stock


During 2020, options to purchase 36,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were exercised for 5,528 shares of common stock, net of tax withholdings, at an exercise prices of $6.30. During 2019, options to purchasepurchase 54,343 shares of the Company’s common stock were exercised for 31,543 shares of common stock at an exercise prices ranging from $3.48$3.48 to $4.35. During 2018, options to purchase 144,947 shares of the Company’s common stock were exercised for 71,290 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $3.48 to $5.64$4.35 in each case by surrendering options andor shares of common stock already owned.owned.


In November 2018,April 2020, the Company closed on an underwritten public offering of 2,726,000619,593 shares of its common stock, including the underwriter’s exercise of its overallotment of 355,565281,125 shares, at $6.75$11.75 per share. The net proceeds of the offering, after deducting the underwriter’s discounts and other offering expenses payable by the Company, was approximately $16.5$28.4 million.


In February 2018, the Company closed on an underwritten registered public offering of 1,783,760 shares of its common stock at $6.75 per share. The net proceeds of the offering, after deducting the underwriter’s discounts and other offering expenses payable by the Company, was approximately $10.9 million.


(b)Preferred  Stock


The Company has 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized and noneNaN outstanding.  These shares can become issuable upon an approved resolution by the board of directors and the filing of a Certificate of Designation with the state of Nevada.



(c)Options, Restricted Stock, and Restricted Stock Units


TheThe Board of Directors or its Compensation Committee may issueauthorize the Company’s issuance of options, restricted stock, and restricted stock units and other equity awards to officers, employees, directors, consultants and other service providers pursuant to employee stock incentive plans that have been approved by the Company’s stockholders.2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan or otherwise.



(d)Warrants


As of December 31, 2019, the2020, the Company has 550,0000 warrants outstanding to purchase shares of common stock as further discussed in Note 14 – Warrants.


NOTE 10 — EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANS:


Effective June 3, 2008, the Company’s stockholders voted to approve the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (“SIP”), with 625,000 shares of common stock available to be issued.  At the Annual Stockholder Meeting on September 22, 2011 the Company’s stockholders voted to approve an increase to the shares of common stock issuable under the SIP by 125,000 to 750,000.  Under the terms of the SIP, which expired during 2018, the Board of Directors or its Compensation Committee had the discretion to select the persons to whom awards were to be granted. Awards could be stock options, restricted stock and/or restricted stock units (“Equity Award Units”).  The awards became vested at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Board or its Compensation Committee.  Cumulatively through December 31, 2019,2020, there were 0694,000 optionsexpired, forfeited or exercised, and at December 31, 2019, 031, 2020, 56,000 options were outstanding and nooutstanding. NaN Equity Award Units were available to be issued under the SIP.

Effective June 19, 2014, the Company’s stockholders voted to approve the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (“SIP14”), with 800,000 shares of common stock available to be issued.  Under the terms of the SIP14, the Board or its Compensation Committee has the discretion to select the persons to whom awards are to be granted.  Awards can be in the form of Equity Award Units.  The awards become vested at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Board or its Compensation Committee.  Cumulatively through December 31, 2019,2020, there were 54,343there were 514,782 options exercised, and at expired, forfeited or exercised. At December 31, 2019, 642,6252020, 264,157 options were outstanding and 148,6670 Equity Award Units were stillare available to be issued under the SIP14. Following the approval of the 2019 Plan (defined below), any Equity Award Units outstanding under the SIP14 remain subject to and be paid under the SIP14, and any shares subject to outstanding awards under the SIP14 that expire, terminate, or are surrendered or forfeited for any reason without issuance of shares automatically become available for issuance under the 2019 Plan.


Effective June 18, 2019, the Company’s stockholders voted to approve the 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2019 Plan”), with 2,400,000 shares of common stock available to be issued. In addition, shares of Common Stock underlying any outstanding award granted under the 2019 Plan that, following the effective date of the 2019 Plan, expires, or is terminated, surrendered or forfeited for any reason without issuance of such shares shall be available for the grant of new awards under the 2019 Plan. Under the terms of the 2019 Plan, the Board or its Compensation Committee has the discretion to select the persons to whom awards are to be granted. Awards can be in the form of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock unit,units, or other stock-based awardaward’s under the 2019 Plan (collectively, 2019“2019 Equity Units)Units”). The awards become vested at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Board or its Compensation Committee. Cumulatively through December 31, 2019, there were 375,0002020, 489,294 2019 Equity Units have been exercised or forfeited. At December 31, 2020, 1,024,563 2019 Equity Units were outstanding, and 1,506,226 2019 Equity Units were available to be awarded under the 2019 Plan and 2,025,000 2019 Equity Units available to be awarded..


The Company’s results for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 include stock-based compensation expense totaling $1,655,900$1,098,698 and $632,805,$1,655,900, respectively. Such amounts have been included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations within cost of product sales ($10,8066,300 and $25,615,$10,806, respectively), research and development ($228,597386,016 and $78,831,$228,597, respectively) and selling, general and administrative expenses ($1,416,497706,382 and $528,360,$1,416,497, respectively).


Stock option compensation expense in the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 represents the estimated fair value of options outstanding, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting period of the entire award. The stock compensation expense were $261,088$480,779 and $351,556 in December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively.


No stock options were issued during 2019. The weighted average estimated fair value of restricted stock and performance/restricted stock unit awards are determined on the date of grant or the date of issuance, as applicable. Stock-based compensation expense for stock options grantedis calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Stock based compensation is reduced for actual forfeitures in the period in which the forfeiture occurs and generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period of the grant. During the year ended December 31, 2018 was $3.76 per share. The fair value2020 and 2019, 486,488 and 0 shares of restricted stock were forfeited, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, 123,127 and 0options at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of the Company’s stock and other contributing factors. The expected term is based on the Company’s historical experience with similar type options.were forfeited, respectively.


The weighted-average assumptions made in calculating the fair values of options are as follows for the respective years ended December 31:


 2019  2018  2020  2019 
Expected term (in years) n/a  4.96   6.29   n/a 
Expected volatility n/a  39.91%  46.21%  n/a 
Expected dividend yield n/a  n/a   0   n/a 
Risk-free interest rate n/a  2.70%  1.30%  n/a 


The following table provides stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018:2019:



 
Number
of Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
per Share
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
  
Number
of Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
per Share
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2017  810,670  $5.18 3.69 years $2,477,853 
Outstanding at December 31, 2019 642,625 $5.79 2.57 years $285,925
                       
Granted  93,750   9.80       726,280 $2.59    0
Exercised  144,947   4.83    523,327  36,000 $6.30    95,976
Forfeited/expired/cancelled  47,505   8.82       358,127 $2.44    0
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  711,968  $5.62 3.33 years $687,364 
Outstanding at December 31, 2020 974,778 $4.12 5.19 years $1,520,910
                       
Exercisable at December 31, 2018  396,799  $4.70 2.66 years $568,956 
             
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  711,968  $5.62 3.33 years $687,364 
             
Granted    $0.00     
Exercised  54,343  $3.60    172,242 
Forfeited/expired/cancelled  15,000  $5.68     
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  642,625  $5.79 2.57 years $285,925 
             
Exercisable at December 31, 2019  493,958  $5.22 2.20 years $285,925 
Exercisable at December 31, 2020 257,211 $7.42 2.87 years $0


The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2019:2020:


 Stock Options Outstanding Stock Options Exercisable  Stock Options Outstanding  Stock Options Exercisable 
Range of
Exercise Prices
 
Shares
Outstanding
 
Average
Remaining
Contract Life
(Year)
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Shares
Exercisable
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
  
Shares
Outstanding
  
Average
Remaining
Contract Life
(Year)
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
  
Shares
Exercisable
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
1 to 2.79999       $  $     $  $   636,364   6.21  $2.36  $1,520,910   0  $0  $0 
2.8 to 4.59999  250,000   1.20   3.42   285,925   250,000   3.42   285,925   0   -   0   0   0   0   0 
4.6 to 6.39999  137,875   2.44   5.87      87,125   5.89      83,664   4.25   5.53   0   39,961   5.53   0 
6.4 to 8.19999  207,875   4.05   7.31      138,083   7.22      207,875   3.05   7.31   0   189,125   7.22   0 
8.2 to 12  46,875   3.60   11.45      18,750   11.45      46,875   2.60   11.45   0   28,125   11.45   0 
Total  642,625   2.57  $5.79  $285,925   493,958  $5.22  $285,925   974,778   5.19  $4.12  $1,520,910   257,211  $7.42  $0 

The average remaining contract life for the shares exercisable is 2.2 years, as of December 31, 2019.


As of December 31, 2019,2020, there was $432,746$736,339 of net unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options that are not vested, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.002.11 years.  The total fair value of shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, was $469,032.$326,630.

The following table summarizes information about restricted stock and restricted stock units outstanding as of December 31, 2019:2020:


 
Number of
Shares & Units
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
  
Number of
Shares & Units
  
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Unvested at December 31, 2018  287,564  $9.65 
Unvested at December 31, 2019  545,986  $7.47 
                
Granted  375,000   5.80   656,759   2.75 
Vested  (116,578)  9.65   112,726   5.63 
Forfeited/expired/cancelled        486,488   6.43 
Unvested at December 31, 2019  545,986   7.47 
Unvested at December 31, 2020  603,531   3.08 


As of December 31, 2019,2020, there was $3,273,929$1,215,441 of net unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock and restricted stock units that are not vested, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.41.8 years. Stock based compensation cost related to restricted stock and restricted stock units recognized during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $617,919 and 2018 was $1,394,814, and $281,249, respectively.


NOTE 11 — GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY:


The Company produces only one group of similar products known collectively as “rapid medical tests,” and itit operates in a single businessoperating segment. Net product salesProduct revenue by geographic area are as follows:follows:


 Year Ending December 31,  Year Ending December 31, 
 2019 2018  2020  2019 
Africa $7,564,360  $8,838,632  $4,890,370  $7,564,360 
Asia  888,800   1,404,982
   824,488   888,800 
Europe & Middle East  3,781,761   2,208,063   5,274,927   3,781,761 
Latin America  11,808,767   12,546,083   9,841,772   11,808,767 
United States  4,801,309   2,915,449   3,935,592   4,801,309 
 $28,844,997  $27,913,209  $24,767,149  $28,844,997 


Long-lived assets by geographic area are as follows:


 2019 2018  2020  2019 
Asia $393,299  $466,185  $326,267  $393,299 
Europe & Middle East  165,029   123,752   147,692   165,029 
Latin America  60,527      14,719   60,527 
United States  5,314,715   2,283,983   8,199,725   5,314,715 
 $5,933,569  $2,873,920  $8,688,403  $5,933,569 


NOTE 12 — COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND CONCENTRATIONS:


a)Employment Contracts:


The Company has multi-year contracts with two2 key employees.  The contracts call for salaries presently aggregating $730,000$843,292 per year, and they expire in March 2020December 2021 and December 2021.2022. The following table is a schedule of future minimum salary commitments:

2020 $365,000 
2021  365,000 

Chembio’s President & CEO, the key employee whose agreement was set to expire in March 2020, resigned effective as of January 3, 2020.
2021 $843,292 
2022  460,000 
2023  0 


b)PensionBenefit Plan:


The Company has a 401(k) plan established for its employees whereby it matches 40% of the first 5% (or 2% of salary) that an employee contributes to the plan.  Matching contribution expenses totaled $93,892$87,377 and $94,544$93,892 for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively.


c)Leases:


Chembio’sThe Company leases have historically been limited to its facilities in New York, Germany, Malaysia, & Brazil. As of December 31, 2019, the Company was a party to eight leases. One of the leases is subject to a sublease for the remainder of its term, as further described below.and Brazil, and certain equipment.


The Company’s facility leases generally include optional renewal periods. Upon entering into a new facility lease, the Company evaluates the leasehold improvements and regulatory requirements related to its operations in that location. To the extent that the initial lease term of the related facility lease is less than the useful life of the leasehold improvements and potential regulatory costs associated with moving the facility, the Company concludes that it is reasonably certain that a renewal option will be exercised, and thus that renewal period is included in the lease term and the related payments are reflected in the right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and lease liability. In January 2019 the Company recognized $0.8 million and $0.8 million of right-of-use assets and liabilities, respectively. During 2019, the Company entered into a new lease agreement for its new headquarter location in Hauppauge, NY. The right-of-use asset acquired in exchange for right-of-use liabilities was approximately $6.5 million.


The Company’s leases generally include fixed rental payments with defined annual increases. While certain of the Company’s leases are gross leases, the majority of the Company’s leases are net leases in which the Company makes separate payments to the lessor based on the lessor’s property and casualty insurance costs, the property taxes assessed on the property, and a portion of the common area maintenance where applicable. The Company has elected the practical expedient not to separate lease and nonlease components for all of the Company’s facility leases. The Company has also elected the practical expedient for short-term lease exception for all of its facility leases.


The components of lease expense were as follows:



Year Ended
December 31, 2019
Operating lease expense$1,655,573
Finance lease cost
Amortization of right-of-use assets$23,372
Interest on lease liabilities7,892
Total finance lease expense$31,265
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2020
  
Year Ended
December 31, 2019
 
Operating lease expense $1,669,105  $1,655,573 
         
Finance lease cost        
Amortization of right-of-use assets $58,414  $23,372 
Interest on lease liabilities  19,986   7,892 
Total finance lease expense $78,400  $31,264 

Rent expense was $653,155 for the year ended December 31, 2018.


Supplemental cash flow and other information related to leases were as follows:




Year Ended
December 31, 2019

 
Year Ended
December 31, 2020
  
Year Ended
December 31, 2019
 
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:         
Operating cash flows for operating leases $632,952  $1,139,944  $632,952 
Operating cash flows for finance leases 7,892   19,987   7,892 
Financing cash flows for finance leases 19,875   51,166   19,875 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations:         7,892 
Operating leases $7,030,744  $0  $7,030,744 
Finance leases 210,350   69,528   210,350 


Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows:


 December 31, 2019 
Operating Leases   
Operating lease right-of-use assets $7,030,744 
   
Current portion of operating lease liability  568,294 
Operating lease liabilities  6,969,603 
Total operating lease liabilities $7,537,897 
     December 31, 2020  December 31, 2019 
Finance Leases          
Finance lease right of use asset $233,722  $315,154  $233,722 
Accumulated depreciation  (23,372)  (82,020)  (23,372)
Finance lease right of use asset, net $210,350  $233,134  $210,350 
            
Current portion of finance lease liability  41,894   58,877   41,894 
Finance lease liability  171,953   185,239   171,953 
Total finance lease liabilities $213,847  $244,116  $213,847 


Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term
Operating leases
9.3 years
Finance leases
4.8 years
Weighted Average Discount Rate
Operating leases8.67%
Finance leases7.00%
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term      
Operating leases 
9.0 years
  9.3 years 
Finance leases 
3.7 years
  4.8 years 
       
Weighted Average Discount Rate      
Operating leases  8.58%  8.67%
Finance leases  8.18%  7.00%


During 2019, the Company executed an operating sublease related to its former Holbrook, New York facility. The sublease runsran conterminously with the base lease in Holbrook, for which the Company remainswas primarily responsible. In addition,responsible until the Company entered into a finance lease agreement relating to office furniture in June 2019. The Company recognized the corresponding lease asset and liability effective June 30, 2019 and recorded related depreciation starting on July 1, 2019. Monthly payments towards this lease commenced in July 2019.

At the timeend of the initial assessment, the Company did not have an established incremental borrowing rate and the interest rates implicitlease term in each of the leases were not readily determinable, therefore the Company used an interest rate based on the market place for public debt. In September 2019, the Company entered into a credit agreement for a $20 million term loan as described on Note 13 - Long Term Debt.April 2020.


Maturities of lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019 were as follows.



 
Operating
Leases
 
Finance
Leases
  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2019 
2020 $1,205,161  $55,536 
 
Operating
Leases
  
Finance
Leases
  
Operating
Leases
  
Finance
Leases
 
2021  1,209,787   55,536  $1,209,787  $76,904  $1,205,161  $55,536 
2022  1,057,757   55,536   1,057,757   76,904   1,209,787   55,536 
2023  1,026,272   55,536   1,026,272   76,904   1,057,757   55,536 
2024  1,018,875   27,767   1,018,875   49,136   1,026,272   55,536 
2025  1,049,442   5,755   1,018,875   27,767 
Thereafter  5,773,887      4,724,445   0   5,773,887   0 
Total lease payments $11,291,739  $249,911  $10,086,578  $285,603  $11,291,739  $249,911 
Less: imputed interest  (3,753,842)  (36,064)  (3,116,975)  (41,487)  (3,753,842)  (36,064)
Total $7,537,897  $213,847  $6,969,603  $244,116  $7,537,897  $213,847 


As previously disclosed in the Company’s 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and under the previous lease accounting standard, future minimum lease payments for operating leases having initial or remaining non-cancellable lease terms in excess of one year would have been as follows for the years ending December 31:

2019 $384,308 
2020  88,576 
2021   
  $472,884 

d)Economic Dependency:


Customers are considered majorThe following table discloses product sales the Company had to customers when net sales exceedthat purchased in excess of 10% of the Company’s total net product sales for period or outstanding trade receivables exceed 10%the periods indicated:

 For The Years Ended  Accounts Receivable 
  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2019  
December 31,
2020
  
December 31,
2019
 
  Net Sales  % of Net Sales  Net Sales  % of Net Sales       
Customer 1 $6,224,737   25.1% $11,263,573   39% $522,218  $941,962 
Customer 2  2,955,312   11.9%  5,782,543   20%  1,987   16,033 
Customer 3  2,956,945   11.9%  *   *   *   * 

Revenue includes product sales only, while accounts receivable reflects the total due from the customer, including freight.


  For the years ended  Accounts Receivable 
  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018  
December 31,
2019
  
December 31,
2018
 
  Net Sales  
% of Net
Sales
  Net Sales  
% of Net
Sales
       
Customer 1 $11,263,573   39% $11,333,767   33% $941,962  $3,499,340 
Customer 2  5,782,543   20%  4,346,640   13%  16,033   1,033,824 

The following table delineatesdiscloses purchases the Company had withmade form vendors in excess of 10% of totalthe Company’s net purchases for the periods indicated:


  For the years ended  Accounts Payable 
  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018  
December
31, 2019
  
December
31, 2018
 
  Purchases  % of Purc.  Purchases  
% of
Purc.
       
Vendor 1  *   *   1,646,614   16%  *   164,312 
 For The Years Ended  Accounts Payable 
  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2019  
December
31, 2020
  
December
31, 2019
 
  Purchases  % of Purc.  Purchases  % of Purc.       
Vendor 1 $2,222,182   13.0%  *   *  $222,588   * 


In the tables above, an asterisk (*) indicates that indicates that sales, accounts receivable, purchases fromor accounts payable, as applicable to the vendortabular column, did not exceed 10% for the period indicated.


The Company purchases materials pursuant to intellectual property rights agreements that are important components in its products.  Management believes that other suppliers could provide similar materials on comparable terms.  A change in suppliers, however, could cause a delay in manufacturing and a possible loss of sales, which could adversely affect operating results.


e)Litigation:


Employee Litigation

John J. Sperzel III, our former chief executive officer, filed suit in the United States District Court in Maine asserting a right to exercise certain options to purchase, for an aggregate exercise price of $943,126, a total of 266,666 shares of common stock that were vested when he resigned on January 3, 2020. Under their terms, those options were exercisable for a period of thirty days after his service to our company ended. The compensation committee of the board, acting in its discretion in accordance with the terms of the underlying equity incentive plans, has determined that Sperzel’s attempt to exercise the options following the thirty day period was not valid. The Court has dismissed Sperzel’s lawsuit for lack of personal jurisdiction in Maine. If Sperzel refiles the lawsuit in another jurisdiction, Chembio intends to vigorously defend against any claim by Mr. Sperzel that he continues to have a right to exercise any options.

Stockholder Litigation

Putative Stockholder Securities Class Action Litigation

As we reported previously, 4 purported securities class action lawsuits were filed by alleged stockholders of our Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York:

Sergey Chernysh v. Chembio Diagnostics, Inc., Richard L. Eberly, and Gail S. Page, filed on June 18, 2020, which we refer to as the Chernysh case;

James Gowen v. Chembio Diagnostics, Inc., Richard L. Eberly, and Gail S. Page, filed on June 22, 2020, which we refer to as the Gowen case;

Anthony Bailey v. Chembio Diagnostics, Inc. Richard J. Eberly, Gail S. Page, and Neil A. Goldman, filed on July 3, 2020, which we refer to as the Bailey case; and

Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P., Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P., and Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. v. Chembio Diagnostics, Inc., Richard Eberly, Gail S. Page, Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc. and Dougherty & Company LLC, filed August 17, 2020, which we refer to as the Special Situations Funds case.

The plaintiffs in each of the cases alleged claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P., Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P., and Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. (together, the “Special Situations Funds”) also asserted claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) relating to Chembio’s May 2020 public offering.

We and the plaintiffs entered into court-approved stipulations relieving the defendants of the obligation to respond to the complaints in these cases pending the designation of a lead plaintiff pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. NaN motions for appointment as lead plaintiff were filed by various prospective lead plaintiffs. However, all but 2 of these motions were withdrawn or otherwise abandoned, leaving before the Court 2 motions for appointment as lead plaintiff -- 1 filed by the Special Situations Funds, and 1 by Municipal Employees’ Retirement System of Michigan (“MERS”). By Order entered December 29, 2020, Magistrate Judge Lindsay consolidated the cases and appointed the Special Situations Funds and MERS as co-lead plaintiffs, and their respective counsel as co-lead counsel. The consolidated cases are now pending under the caption “In re Chembio Diagnostics, Inc. Securities Litigation.”

F-28
F-25

e)Litigation:

From timeThe Special Situations Funds and MERS (together “Lead Plaintiffs”) filed their Consolidated Amended Complaint (“CAC”) on February 12, 2021. In summary, the CAC purports to time,allege claims based on assertedly false and misleading statements and omissions concerning the performance of the DPP COVID-19 IgM/IgG System, as well as an asserted failure to timely disclose that the Emergency Use Authorization that had been granted by the Food and Drug Administration with respect to the System “was -- or was at an increased risk of -- being revoked.”  The CAC names as defendants the Company, Richard L. Eberly, Gail S. Page, Neil A. Goldman, Javan Esfandiari, Katherine L. Davis, Dr. Mary Lake Polan, Dr. John Potthoff, and the underwriters for the Company’s May 2020 public offering, Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc. and Dougherty & Company LLC.

The CAC purports to assert five counts under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act of 1934. Counts I through III are brought under the Securities Act, allegedly on behalf of a purported class consisting of all persons who purchased Chembio common stock directly in or traceable to the Company’s May 2020 offering pursuant to the Company’s Form S-3 Registration Statement and its Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement dated May 7, 2020 (the “Securities Act Class”). Count I purports to allege a claim for violation of Section 11 of the Securities Act against all defendants other than Messrs. Eberly and Esfandiari. Count II purports to allege a claim for violation of Section 12 of the Securities Act against all defendants other than Messrs. Eberly and Esfandiari. Count III purports to allege a claim under Section 15 of the Securities Act against Ms. Davis, Dr. Polan, Dr. Potthoff, Ms. Page, and Mr. Goldman.

Counts IV and V are alleged claims under the Exchange Act on behalf of a purported class consisting of all persons who purchased Chembio securities on the open market between March 12, 2020 and June 16, 2020, inclusive (the “Exchange Act Class”). Count IV purports to allege a claim for violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder against the Company, Mr. Eberly, Ms. Page, Mr. Goldman, and Mr. Esfandiari. Count V purports to allege a claim under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against Mr. Eberly, Ms. Page, Mr. Goldman, and Mr. Esfandiari.

Lead Plaintiffs seek, on behalf of the Securities Act Class and the Exchange Act Class, among other things, an award of damages in an amount to be proven at trial, as well as an award of reasonable costs, including attorneys’ fees and expenses, expert fees, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, and such other relief as the court deems just and proper. The Lead Plaintiffs also seeks rescission “or a rescissory measure of damages” on behalf of the Securities Act Class as to Count II.

Pursuant to an Order entered by the Court on January 29, 2021, any defendant wishing to move against the amended complaint was required to file, by February 18, 2021, a letter requesting a pre-motion conference. On that date, the defendants submitted letters to the Court requesting a pre-motion conference regarding anticipated motions to dismiss the CAC, and Lead Plaintiffs responded on February 24, 2021. In its January 29, 2021 Order, the Court indicated that it would consider a briefing schedule on motions to dismiss after it had received and reviewed the parties’ correspondence.

On March 5,2021, the Court entered an Order in which the Court advised the parties that it had determined that a pre-motion conference was not necessary and established a briefing schedule on the defendants’ anticipated motions to dismiss. Pursuant to that schedule, defendants’ motions and supporting papers are due to be filed no later than March 19,2021, the Lead Plaintiffs’ opposition papers are due to be filed no later than April 2,2021, and the defendants’ reply papers are due to be filed no later than April 9,2021. We have agreed with Plaintiffs’ counsel to a modification of the schedule such that defendants’ motions and supporting papers would be due to be filed no later than March 26, 2021, the Lead Plaintiffs’ opposition papers would be due to be filed no later than April 16, 2021, and the defendants’ reply papers would be due to be filed no later than April 30, 2021. This schedule modification is involved in certain legal actions arisingsubject to the Court’s approval.

Putative Stockholder Derivative Litigation

On September 11, 2020, a putative stockholder derivative action was filed purportedly on our Company’s behalf in the ordinary courseUnited States District Court for the Eastern District of business.New York captioned Karen Wong, derivatively on behalf of Chembio Diagnostics, Inc., Plaintiff v. Richard L. Eberly, Gail S. Page, Neil A. Goldman, Javan Esfandiari, Katherine L. Davis, Mary Lake Polan, and John G. Potthoff, Defendants, and Chembio Diagnostics, Inc., Nominal Defendant, which we refer to as the Wong complaint. The outcomesWong complaint purports to assert a claim for violation of such actions, either individually orSection 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 thereunder based on ostensibly false and misleading statements and omissions concerning our rapid COVID-19 antibody test in the aggregate,proxy statement disseminated in advance of our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on July 28, 2020. The Wong complaint also asserts claims against the individual defendants for purported breaches of fiduciary duties owed to our Company, as well as unjust enrichment.

The Wong complaint requests a declaration that the individual defendants have breached or aided and abetted the breach of their fiduciary duties to our Company, an award of damages to our Company, restitution, and an award of the plaintiff’s costs and disbursements in the action, including reasonable attorneys’ and experts’ fees, costs and expenses, and improvements to our Company’s corporate governance and internal procedures regarding compliance with laws. Pursuant to a stipulation by which the individual defendants in the Wong action agreed to waive service of process, the Court ordered that the time for defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint be extended to November 19, 2020. The parties subsequently entered into a stipulation for a stay of proceedings in the Wong action pending final disposition of motions to dismiss the pending putative class action litigation, subject to certain conditions. The Court entered an order granting the requested stay on November 3, 2020.

Commercial Litigation

Chembio Diagnostic Systems Inc. (“Chembio”) and BioSure (UK) Ltd (“BioSure”) entered into the BioSure Sure Check® HIV 1/2 Assay OTC Agreement dated April 2,2014, and as subsequently amended (the “Distribution Agreement”). Pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, BioSure acquired the right to sell bundled products in the UK containing Chembio’s Sure Check® HIV 1/2 pouched tests. The Distribution Agreement terminated on April 1,2019. On September 16,2019, Chembio initiated arbitration in New York, USA. Chembio alleges that BioSure (1) breached various provisions of the Distribution Agreement, (2) misappropriated Chembio’s trade secrets, (3) engaged in deceptive business acts and practices, and (4) breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On November 23,2020, BioSure requested leave to file a counterclaim seeking recession of the Distribution Agreement based on alleged fraudulent concealment by Chembio.  Chembio opposed BioSure’s request for leave to file the counterclaim on procedural and substantive grounds, and on December 11,2020 the Tribunal denied the request for leave to file the counterclaim.  The Tribunal’s denial was without prejudice to BioSure’s ability to assert its claim in a separate proceeding.  BioSure continues to deny the relief sought and alleges certain statements Chembio made to third parties about the Distribution Agreement were in bad faith and are a defense to Chembio’s claims. BioSure also asserts that certain alleged misrepresentations entitle BioSure to “set off” any award Chembio might receive from the Tribunal. The parties have completed discovery, and submitted their first pre-hearing submissions. Chembio intends to vigorously pursue its claims in the arbitration. The final merits hearing is scheduled for April 2021. At this stage in the litigation, we are not expectedable to havepredict the probability of a material adverse effect on the Company’s future financial positionfavorable or results of operations.unfavorable outcome.


f)Governmental Regulation:


All of the Company’s existing and proposed diagnostic products are regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, certain U.S., state and local agencies, and/or comparable regulatory bodies in other countries. Most aspects of development, production, and marketing, including product testing, authorizations to market, labeling, promotion, manufacturing, and record keeping, are subject to regulatory review. After marketing approval has been granted, Chembio must continue to comply with governmental regulations. Failure to comply with applicable requirements can lead to sanctions, including withdrawal of products from the market, recalls, refusal to authorize government contracts, product seizures, civil money penalties, injunctions, and criminal prosecution.



NOTE 13 — LONG-TERM DEBT:


In September 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with an equipment vendor to purchase automated assembly equipment for approximately $660,000. The terms call for payments of 30% down, 60% at time of factory acceptance testing and 10% after delivery.  The vendor agreed to lend the Company 15%, 40%, and 10%, of each originally scheduled payment, respectively.  The Company paid interest at an annual rate of 12% until delivery.  Beginning in September 2018, the Company began making monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $20,150, at an annual rate of 12% over a twenty-four month period. The remaining balance was entirely short-term as of December 31, 2019. This balance was fully paid during 2020.


On September 3, 2019, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement and Guaranty (the “Credit Agreement”) with Perceptive Credit Holdings II, LP (the “Lender”). The Credit Agreement provides for a $20,000,000 senior secured term loan credit facility, which was drawn in full on September 4, 2019. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company may use the proceeds (i) for general working capital purposes and other permitted corporate purposes, (ii) to refinance certain of the Company’s existing indebtedness and (iii) to pay fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Credit Agreement, including the Lender’s closing cost amount of $550,000, which was netted from the proceeds, and a financing fee of $600,000 (3.0% of gross proceeds) payable to Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, the Company’s financial advisor for the financing.


Principal outstanding under the Credit Agreement bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) the greater of the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate and 2.5% plus (b) 8.75%. At any time at which an event of default has occurred and is continuing, the interest rate will increase by 4.0%. Accrued interest is payable on a monthly basis. On December 31, 20192020 the interest rate was 11.25%.


No principal repayments are due under the Credit Agreement prior to September 30, 2022, unless the Company elects to prepay principal or principal is accelerated pursuant to an event of default identified in the Credit Agreement. Principal installments in the amount of $300,000 are payable on the last day of each of the eleven months from September 2022 through July 2023, and all remaining principal is payable at maturity on September 3, 2023. The Company may prepay outstanding principal from time to time, subject to payment of a premium on the prepaid principal amount equal to 10% through September 3, 2020, 8% from September 4, 2020 through September 3, 2021, and 4% from September 4, 2021 through September 3, 2022. No premium will be due with respect to any prepayment made on or after September 4, 2022.


As of December 31, 2019, the loan balance, net of unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs, was $17.6 million, and the company was in compliance with its loan covenants. OurChembio’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by a first priority, perfected lien on substantially all of ourits property and assets, including ourits equity interests in our subsidiaries.


F-29As of December 31, 2020, the loan balance, net of unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs, was $18.2 million, and Chembio was in compliance with its loan covenants.


NOTE 14 — WARRANTS:


In connection with entering into the Credit Agreement, on September 3, 2019, the Company issued to the Lender a seven-year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 550,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a per-share exercise price of $5.22. The Warrant iswas exercisable for cash or on a net, or “cashless,” basis, and the exercise price of the Warrant iswas subject to price-based, weighted-average antidilution adjustments for one year after issuance.


The Warrant was evaluated by the Company and classified towithin stockholder’s equity. Itsfair value was estimated using aBlack-Scholes option-pricing model using the assumptions below.


Stock price on issuance date $5.40 
Strike Price $5.22 
Risk-free interest rate  1.45%
Volatility  43.65%
Expected life 7 years 


The fair value of the Warrant was determined to be approximately $1.4$1.4 million at $2.49$2.49 per share.


As of December 31, 2020, the Warrant was fully exercised.



NOTE 15 - GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS:

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, there was 0 impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets.

Following is a table that reflects changes in Goodwill:

Beginning balance January 1, 2020 $5,872,690 
Changes in foreign currency exchange rate  91,054 
Balance at December 31, 2020 $5,963,744 

Intangible assets consist of the balancefollowing at:

  December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
 
Weighted Average
Remaining Life
Cost
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Book Value
Cost
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Book Value
Intellectual property5$1,638,699$472,190$1,166,509$1,418,681$299,232$1,119,449
Developed technology52,102,526594,1861,508,3401,922,682266,5501,656,132
Customer contracts/relationships61,323,424423,093900,3311,325,521270,9021,054,619
Trade names7115,31844,51270,806114,94630,79484,152
  $5,179,967$1,533,981$3,645,986$4,781,830$867,478$3,914,352

Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $588,962 and $515,263, respectively, and is recorded within COGS, R&D and Selling, General and Administrative expenses. Amortization expense, subject to changes in currency exchange rates, is expected to be approximately $617,000 per year from 2021 through 2025, and total $561,000 million for all of the years thereafter.


NOTE 16 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:


Restructuring

On January 14, 2021, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) approved a restructuring plan (“2021 Plan”) to better align its business priorities. The Plan comprises the termination of employees primarily in the manufacturing department. These actions were intended to better align the Company’s Stockholders’ Equity forcost structure with the Warrants, netskills and resources required to more effectively pursue opportunities in the marketplace and execute the Company’s long-term growth strategy.

Costs associated with the 2021 Plan are primarily related to Severance and Legal costs. Severance payouts are expected to be substantially completed by the end of allocated issuance costs, was $1.2the six months ending June 30, 2021. Under the 2021 Plan, the Company expects to incur pre-tax charges between approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million.

As of December 31, 2019, no warrants were exercised and no warrants have expired.



F-30
F-28