Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202023
ORor
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 001-08443
Telos logo.jpg
TELOS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland52-0880974
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
19886 Ashburn Road, Ashburn, Virginia20147-2358
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (703) 724-3800

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading symbolName of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, $0.001 par value per shareTLSThe Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes      No   
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes      No  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒    No ☐ 


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large"large accelerated filer,” “accelerated" "accelerated filer,” “smaller" "smaller reporting company”company" and “emerging"emerging growth company”company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report Yes ☒    No ☐ 
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes      No  

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2020:  Not applicable

2023 was approximately $134.7 million based upon the last reported sale price of the registrant's common stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC as of the close of business on that day.
As of March 15, 2021,8, 2024, the registrant had outstanding 64,625,07170,319,620 shares of common stock.

DOCUMENTSINCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

CertainPortions of the information required in Part III of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference toregistrant's definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed for the2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be heldfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant's fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on May 25, 2021.

Form 10-K.
1

Table of Contents
Table of Contents to 2023 Form 10-K
Page
PART I
3
Item 1A.15
1Item24
25
25
25
PART II
26
27
28
72
72
2

Table of Contents
PART IV
73
76
77


2
3

Table of Contents

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, in the future the Company, and others on its behalf, may make statements that constitute forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements relating to the Company’sCompany's plans, objectives or goals; future economic performance or prospects; the potential effect on the Company’sCompany's future performance of certain contingencies; and assumptions underlying any such statements.

You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the Company's forward-looking statements.
Words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends”"believes," "anticipates," "expects," "intends" and “plans”"plans" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. The forward-looking statements are and will be based upon management’smanagement's then current views and assumptions regarding future events and operating performance and are only applicable as of the dates of such statements. The Company does not intend to update these forward-looking statements except as may be required by applicable laws.

By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, and risks exist that predictions, forecasts, projections and other outcomes described or implied in forward-looking statements will not be achieved. The Company cautions you that a number ofthese important factors could cause results to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements, including without limitation the risks described under the caption “Risk Factors”"Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You
Although we base these forward-looking statements on assumptions that we believe are cautionedreasonable when made, we caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Given these risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, we caution you not to place undue reliance on the Company’sthese forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise.



4

Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Business

General Overview

Telos Corporation is a Maryland corporation headquartered in Ashburn, Virginia. Telos Corporation, together with its subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company" or “Telos”"Telos" or “We”"We"), offers technologically advanced, software-based security solutions that empower and protect the world’sworld's most security-conscious organizations against rapidly evolving, sophisticated and pervasive threats. Our portfolio of security products, services and expertise empowerempowers our customers with capabilities to reach new markets, serve their stakeholders more effectively, and successfully defend the nation or their enterprise. We protect our customers’ people, information, and digital assets so they can pursue their corporate goals and conduct their global missionsenterprise with confidence in their security and privacy.

Our customer base consists of the U.S. federal government, large commercial businesses, state and local governments, as well as international customers. Our federal government customers include the Department of Defense (“DoD”), the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”) and multiple other agencies within the Intelligence Community (“IC”), and multiple civilian agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), the U.S. Department of State (“DoS”), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”). Our commercial customers include Fortune 500 enterprises such as Amazon.com, Inc., Citigroup Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and Salesforce.com, Inc. We have conducted business with over 350 customers in each of the last three years. For the year ended December 31, 2020, approximately 50% of our revenue was derived from sole source contracts or contracts for which we had limited competition. Our customers are highly targeted by cyber attackers and require continuous real-time insights to make informed decisions about how to effectively balance the constraints of security risk with the freedom to act and decide in the best interests of the organization and the greater good of the public. Our advanced security solutions help protect and ensure confidence in the information that is vital to the world’s most important commercial and governmental organizations, national security, and mission success for the warfighter.

Our revenue growth trajectory began to accelerate in 2018 as we increased our investment into new products and solutions. Our security solutions are the product of the investment of approximately 3,000 man-years developing our intellectual property and highly sophisticated software technology. These investments helped us expand with commercial customers, as well as win additional contracts within the military and the IC. Revenue grew from $107.7 million in 2017 to $138.0 million in 2018 and to $159.2 million in 2019 and to $179.9 million in 2020, representing annual growth rates of 28.1%, 15.4%, and 13.0%, respectively. Once our security solutions are imbedded in our customers’ technology infrastructure, these customer relationships often expand and lead to us providing additional security solutions. As a consequence, we believe that our customer turnover is low and, based on historical experience, approximately 85% of our revenue is recurring, as discussed further below.

We develop our annual budgeted revenue by estimating for the upcoming year our continuing business from existing customers and active contracts. We consider backlog, both funded and unfunded (as explained below), other expected annual renewals, and expansion planned by our current customers. In the context of our current customer portfolio, we view “recurring revenue” as revenue that occurs often and repeatedly. In each of the last three years, recurring revenue has exceeded 85% of our annual revenue. Our total budgeted revenue is the combination of recurring revenue and a forecast of new business.

Total backlog, a component of recurring revenue, consists of the aggregate contract revenues remaining to be earned by us at a given time over the life of our contracts, whether funded or unfunded. Funded backlog consists of the aggregate contract revenues remaining to be earned at a given time, which, in the case of U.S. government contracts, means that they have been funded by the procuring agency. Unfunded backlog is the difference between total backlog and funded backlog and includes potential revenues that may be earned if customers exercise delivery orders and/or renewal options to continue these contracts. Based on historical experience, we generally assume option year renewals to be exercised. Most of our customers fund contracts on a basis of one year or less and, as a result, funded backlog is generally expected to be earned within one year from any point in time, whereas unfunded backlog is expected to be earned over a longer period.

3

Table of Contents
On November 19, 2020, we completed our initial public offering of shares of our common stock. We issued 17.2 million shares of our common stock at a price of $17.00 per share, generating net proceeds of approximately $272.7 million.  We used approximately $108.9 million of the net proceeds in connection with the conversion of our outstanding shares of Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock into the right to receive cash and shares of our common stock, $30.0 million to fund our acquisition of the outstanding Class B Units of Telos ID, and $21.0 million to repay our outstanding senior term loan and subordinated debt.  We intend to use the remaining net proceeds for general corporate purposes. We also may use a portion of the net proceeds to acquire complementary businesses, products, services, or technologies. We do not, however, have agreements, commitments, or plans for any specific acquisitions at this time. The amounts and timing of our actual use of the net proceeds will vary depending on numerous factors.

Our Mission: Cyber, Cloud, and Enterprise Security

Our mission is to protect our customers’customers' people, systems,information, and vital informationdigital assets with offerings for cybersecurity, cloud security, and enterprise security. In the current global environment, our mission is more critical than ever. The emergence of each new information and communications technology (“ICT”("ICT") introduces new vulnerabilities, as security is still too often overlooked in solution development. Networks and applications meant to enhance productivity and profitability often jeopardize an organization due to poor planning, misconfiguration, or an unknown gap in security. Ransomware, insider threats, cybercrime, and advanced persistent threats continue to menace public and private enterprises across all industries.

Cybersecurity, cloud security, and enterprise security of the modern organization share much in common, yet also call for a diverse range of skills, capabilities, and experience in order to meet the requirements of security-conscious customers. Decades of experience in developing, orchestrating, and delivering solutions across these three domains givesgive us the vision and the confidence to provide solutions that empower and protect the enterprise at an integrated, holistic level. Our experience in addressing challenges in one area of an enterprise helps us meet requirements in others. We understand that a range of complementary capabilities may be needed to solve a single challenge, and we also recognize when a single solution might address multiple challenges.

Our security solutions span acrossthese three domains: cybersecurity, cloud security and enterprise security.
Fiscal year 2023 was a transition year for Telos, with a focus on streamlining our operations while rebuilding and growing our revenue base by generating new business wins. Our 2023 business development priorities were to:
Reorganize internally to consolidate and centralize business development resources;
Add new talent to drive execution of solution development and new business generation;
Maximize existing strategic partnerships for market expansion; and
Increase our opportunity portfolio and quality of contract vehicles.
To improve our path forward, we planned to:
Optimize our solution portfolio through accelerated plays on various programs and enhance program management;
Expand our pipeline and strengthen proposals for new businesses; and
Engage all employees through synergy, setting performance goals, and improving benefits.
Business Segments
We conduct our business through two reportable and operating segments: Security Solutions and Secure Networks. These segments enable the following domains:alignment of our strategies and objectives and provide a framework for the timely and rational allocation of resources within the line of business.
Additional information regarding our segments is presented in Note 18 Segment Information to the consolidated financial statements at Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
5

Security Solutions Segment:
The Security Solutions segment focuses on cybersecurity, cloud, identity solutions, and secure messaging. Cybersecurity – We solutions help our customers ensure the ongoing security, integrity and compliance of their on-premises and related cloud-based systems by reducing threats and vulnerabilities in order to foil cyber adversaries before they can attack. Our consultantssecurity engineers and subject matter experts assess our customers’ securitycustomers' cybersecurity environments and design, engineer, and operate the systems they needneeded to strengthen their cybersecurity posture.

Cloud Security – Thepostures. Our cloud as an organizational resource is more than two decades old, yet the needs of cloud users are constantly changing. Telos offerssolutions leverage the specialized skills and experience needed to help our customers plan, engineer, execute, and executeaccelerate secure cloud migration strategies and then assuremigrations while assuring ongoing management and security in keeping withof enterprise cloud technology environments. Our identity solutions deliver digital identity, biometric, and nationwide enrollment services and address Know Your Customer and identity management challenges for enterprises working within regulated and critical infrastructure environments. Our secure messaging services are used to securely transmit messages that provide direction and establish a formal position, commitment, or responses requiring the leading standardsauthority of an organization. Security Solutions represented 53.3% and 55.5% of total revenues for cloud-based systemsfiscal years 2023 and workloads.2022, respectively.

EnterpriseThe Security – Securing the enterprise means protecting the essential and timeless elements common to every organization: its people and processes, its supply chain and inventories, its finances and facilities, and its information and communications. As ICT and operational technology (“OT”) have become part of the organizational make-up, we have offered solutions that ensure personnel can work securely and productively across and beyond the enterprise.

Our Market

Our market includes organizations in business across industry verticals, government, and the military. We believe that digital transformation is a reality for these organizations and that the ICT systems they depend on for their success and security are subject to unprecedented levels of stress, threat, and attack. Market-disrupting technologies, a global pandemic, and economic uncertainty make it difficult for customers to plan for business expansion, develop new programs in service to the public, or prepare military forces for the nation’s defense. Public and private enterprises alike face Solutions segment offers the following dynamic challenges that threaten their security:solutions and services:

Heavy dependence on information and operational technologies.Organizations are increasingly dependent on technology, including mobile and wireless applications, cloud-based resources, industrial internet of things (“IoT”), industrial control systems (“ICS”), supervisory control and data acquisition (“SCADA”), and others.
Digital transformation and accelerating migration to the cloud.Enterprises and government agencies are accelerating the migration of applications, storage, and ICT/OT infrastructure to hosted and cloud environments. More organizations – including highly security-conscious agencies within the U.S. government and commercial entities – are gaining comfort and confidence in the cloud, taking advantage of the rapid application development, greater flexibility, and strategic agility that the cloud offers.
Ability to work across and beyond the enterprise.Organizations are no longer defined by or confined by real estate, geography, or personnel rosters. Information and applications are now accessible in the cloud. Mobile devices free personnel to work wherever their mission takes them. Employees, contractors, and partners collaborate in the physical and digital domains, trusting that they can rely on the integrity and trustworthiness of their people and their systems.
Turbulent technology environment due to COVID-19.The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the growth of the remote workforce and thus, cyber risk. Existing technologies for mobility are being stretched to the limit, and enterprises are facing dramatic growth in cyber-attack risk as a result of personnel and systems that are still adjusting to an increasing number of workers accessing systems remotely. Ransomware, phishing attempts, and inadequate virtual private networks (“VPNs”) all contribute to a significant increase in threats and vulnerabilities.

Information Assurance:
4

Table of Contents
The networked nature of enterprise technologies and the ability to work outside the organizational perimeter result in increased risk and the constant threat of attack. In particular, the cloud adds new complexities due to the shared responsibility of cloud security and the need to manage and maintain the compliance of cloud-based resources.

Our solutions across a wide variety of use cases are designed to address our customers’ proliferating need to understand and address cybersecurity risk, reduce the organizational attack surface, enhance enterprise mobility, expand adoption of cloud computing, and manage and protect identities in an increasingly dynamic and intensifying threat landscape. By addressing the breadth of our customers’ complex and evolving needs, we believe that our total addressable market in 2021 for the security services and products that we provide is over $80 billion.

Our Offerings

We refer to our cyber and cloud applications as Security Solutions, which includes Information Assurance / Xacta®, Secure Communications, and Telos ID. We refer to our offerings for enterprise security as Secure Networks.

Security Solutions
Information Assurance / Xacta:Xacta®: a premier platform for enterprise cyber risk management and security compliance automation, delivering security awareness for systems in the cloud, on-premises, and in hybrid and multi-cloud environments. Xacta delivers automated cyber risk and compliance management solutions to large commercial and government enterprises. Across the U.S. federal government, Xacta is the de facto commercial cyber risk and compliance management solution.
Secure Communications:
Telos Ghost: a virtual obfuscation network-as-a-service with encryption and managed attribution capabilities to ensure the safety and privacy of people, information, and resources on the network. Telos Ghost seeks to eliminate cyber-attack surfaces by obfuscating and encrypting data, masking user identity and location, and hiding network resources. It provides the additional layers of security and privacy needed for intelligence gathering, cyber threat protection, securing critical infrastructure, and protecting communications and applications when operations, property, and even lives can be jeopardized by a single error in security.
Telos Automated Message Handling System (“AMHS”): web-based organizational message distribution and management for mission-critical communications; the recognized gold standard for organizational messaging in the U.S. government. Telos AMHS is used by military field operatives for critical communications on the battlefield and is the only web-based solution for assured messaging and directory services using the Defense Information System Agency’s (“DISA”) Organizational Messaging Service and its specialized communications protocols.
Telos ID: offering Identity Trust and Digital Services through IDTrust360® – an enterprise-class digital identity risk platform for extending software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) and custom digital identity services that mitigate threats through the integration of advanced technologies that fuse biometrics, credentials, and other identity-centric data used to continuously monitor trust. We maintain government certifications and designations that distinguish Telos ID, including TSA PreCheck® enrollment provider, Designated Aviation Channeling provider, FBI-approved Channeler, and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Electronic Fingerprint Submission provider. We are the only commercial entity in our industry designated as a Secure Flight Services provider for terrorist watchlist checks.

Secure Networks
Secure Mobility: solutions for business and government that enable remote work and minimize concern across and beyond the enterprise. Our secure mobility team brings credentials to every engagement, supplying deep expertise and experience as well as highly desirable clearances and industry recognized certifications for network engineering, mobility, and security.
Network Management and Defense: services for operating, administrating, and defending complex enterprise networks and defensive cyber operations. Our diverse portfolio of capabilities addresses common and uncommon requirements in many industries and disciplines, ranging from the military and government agencies to Fortune 500 companies.

Xacta

Xacta Overview

Xacta delivers automated cyber risk and compliance management solutions to large commercial and government enterprises. Across the United States ("U.S.") federal government, Xacta is sold as a solution, which includes Xacta technology and Xacta subject matter experts (“SMEs”) to help with deployment, on-going support, and training to ensure rapid and long-term customer success. Our solution-based business model provides predictable, recurring, and growing revenue year-on-year.

Xacta disrupted the cyber risk and compliance management industry 20 years ago. When it was first introduced, Xacta represented a new way of doing business that challenged the inefficient labor-intensive business models of traditional consultants and government contractors who charge by the hour.

5

Table of Contents
We have developed and evolved Xacta over the past two decades to make security risk and compliance activities more efficient through workflow-based automation. Many cyber risk and compliance management activities can be automated, which greatly reduces the need for inefficient Time and Materials (“T&M”) services. More importantly, we believe that certain critical capabilities like continuous monitoring are effectively impossible without automation.

Xacta is the de factoleading commercial cyber risk and compliance management solution across the U.S. federal government. Noteworthy U.S. government enterprise customers include DoD, multiple agencies within the IC (including the CIA), and civilian agencies such as DHS, DoS and the FBI. Xacta cloud security is also being adopted by very large commercial organizations like Amazon Web Services (“AWS”) and Microsoft Azure.

Across these government and commercial customers, we currently have hundreds of Xacta deployments used to manage tens of thousands of mission critical/national security systems that are comprised of millions of critical information technology (“IT”) assets and cloud resources. There are also more than 20,000 cyber security professionals who activelysolution. With use Xacta to managecases including cyber risk for a wide range of IT/information systems in warfighting, intelligence, business/financial, and healthcare applications.

In 2016, at the request of the CIA, we evolved Xacta from an on-premises cybermanagement, risk andremediation management, security authorization, compliance management, solution, used to manage traditional IT assets, to a solution that also manages cloud resources. As a result, we believe that Xacta is unique in its ability to manage complex hybrid IT environments that span on-premises, cloud, and multi-cloud. Our cloud focus has attracted the attention of the largest cloud and cloud service providers in the world, many of which are now our partners and customers. These partnerships have greatly increased our market opportunity, as many organizations look to migrate to the cloud. Security compliance remains a major inhibitor to cloud adoption. Xacta addresses this issue by automating and accelerating security compliance activities allowing organizations to migrate to the cloud more quickly and securely.

Recognizing these advantages, the two largest cloud providers in the world, AWS and Microsoft Azure, have partnered with Telos to use Xacta to accelerate security compliance activities in their air-gapped and global sovereign cloud environments to help hundreds of thousands of regulated organizations address security risk and compliance much more efficiently.

Our cloud focus has also resulted in significant partnerships with other cloud organizations, such as Rackspace Technology, Inc., which are helping SaaS vendors address cloud compliance requirements, including the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (“FedRAMP”), which is required by the federal government for all SaaS solutions. There are thousands of potential SaaS applications needed by the federal government. These organizations understand that Xacta’s ability to reduce the security compliance burden helps accelerate cloud adoption and generates cloud usage and revenue more quickly. To this end, Xacta’s capabilities are viewed as a strategic advantage by these cloud-centric organizations.

Managing cyber risk is top-of-mind for many organizations today. There is an increasing number of security standards and regulations with which global organizations must comply. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) is the source for many security standards that are being adopted globally. Telos, using Xacta, has specialized in supporting NIST-based standards for nearly 20 years. We have been considered by a leading, third-party consultancy to be NIST-based cybersecurity domain experts.

Xacta’s Critical Capabilities

Xacta offers a number of critical and differentiated capabilities that support a wide range of cyber risk and compliance management use cases, such as:

Automated asset inventory - helps quickly define IT boundary/parameters and establish audit/test plans.
Automated control validation - reduces manual test efforts.
Automated continuous control monitoring - offers ongoing assurance of compliance.
Vulnerability management functionality - understand vulnerabilities that apply to IT environments.
Remediation management - workflow to help organizations prioritize risk, establish remediation plans, and track remediation progress to closure.
Automated regulatory report generation - reduces manual effort needed to create regulatory reports (bi-product of the workflow process).
Cloud integration - allows Xacta to manage cloud-based resources (multi-cloud environments) as well as on-premises assets.
Cloud deployment - allows Xacta to be deployed as a SaaS, Virtual Machine Image (“VMI”), Amazon Machine Image, and Microsoft Azure VMI, as well as on-premises.
Intelligent workflow - Artificial Intelligence (“AI”)-like functionality reduces the need for manual intervention.
Predictive control mapping - AI-like functionality helps reduce redundant control testing and manual control mapping effort to help address audit fatigue.
Automated control inheritance - allows organizations to share common compliance information - cloud providers share common controls with customers as per the shared responsibility model of cloud security - which greatly reduces manual effort and enables rapid cloud adoption.
Visualization and reporting - reduces dependency on third-party business intelligence products.
End-to-end workflow capabilities - support for complex system authorization processes like FedRAMP and the NIST Risk Management Framework, dramatically reducing time, cost, and effort.
Evidence of security posture compliance - designed to provide the body of evidence needed for regulatory or legal proceedings and insurance claims to verify security posture compliance with industry best practices at the time of an event.

6

Table of Contents
Xacta Evolution

Xacta was launched in August 2000 and was the first automated solution of its kind. Xacta was initially created to help U.S. government organizations satisfy demanding security risk and compliance management requirements. Over the years, commercial and international demand for the Xacta solutions provided by Telos has grown rapidly.

In 2004, Xacta was enhanced to provide industry-first automated continuous monitoring functionality. Between 2002 and 2005, Telos was issued five patents in the area of security risk and compliance management, including one patent for what is now known as continuous monitoring. Since then, numerous technical enhancements have been made to Xacta, some of which are described above in “Xacta’s Critical Capabilities.”

Xacta supports other NIST frameworks such as the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (“CSF”), which was established in 2014 via Executive Order 13636 to help commercial organizations in the 16 DHS-defined critical infrastructure sectors improve their cyber risk posture. Executive Order 13800, issued in 2017, requires federal agencies to adopt the CSF, and it is also being adopted by many countries as a national cybersecurity standard.

Xacta also currently supports various vendor/supply chain risk management standards such as NIST Special Publication 800-161 and NIST Special Publication 800-171. NIST 800-171 is a contractual requirement for approximately 70,000 commercial companies that support the U.S. federal government.

Xacta will also support an emerging standard called Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, which will soon be required by approximately 300,000 commercial organizations that support DoD.

Xacta has highly customizable workflows that can be configured to support most any cybersecurity/risk and compliance management frameworks. To that end, Xacta can support national and international security compliance standards such as HIPAA, PCI-DSS, ISO 27000, and many others.

Xacta does not require a customer to abandon (i.e. rip and replace) its existing solutions - rather it works with the customer’s prior software choices and uses those software choices as data feeds so that Xacta can perform automated (and continuous) security compliance validation.

Xacta use cases include audit management, compliance management, inventory management, vulnerability management, continuous compliance monitoring, vendor/and vendor and supply chain risk management, cyber risk management, risk remediation management,Xacta administers the key elements of more than 100 leading regulations and policies for IT security authorizations. These use cases are broadly applicable across industry verticals globallycompliance, including the National Institute of Standards and help explainTechnology ("NIST") Risk Management Framework ("RMF"), RMF for Department of Defense ("DoD") IT, Committee on National Security Systems Instruction No. 1253, NIST Cybersecurity Framework, the largeFederal Risk and expanding market in which Xacta participates.Authorization Management Program and the DoD's Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification ("CMMC") program.

Our goal is to make XactaCybersecurity services: proven solutions and services for the default security riskfull cybersecurity lifecycle, including consulting services, assessment and compliance, engineering and evaluation, operations, and penetration testing. With a pedigree in information and cybersecurity that spans three decades, our certified cybersecurity personnel provide services and solutions that deliver continuous security assurance for business, government, and critical infrastructure.
Secure Communications:
Telos Automated Message Handling System ("Telos AMHS"): web-based organizational message distribution and management solutionfor mission-critical communications; the recognized gold standard for organizational messaging in the U.S. government. Telos AMHS™ is used by military field operatives for critical communications on the battlefield using the Defense Information System Agency's Organizational Messaging Service and its specialized communications protocols. Telos AMHS is also used by the Intelligence Community ("IC") for timely situational awareness and assessment reporting utilizing the Director of choiceNational Intelligence's Information Transport Service, Organizational Messaging data standards and computing infrastructure. Because Telos AMHS supports timely and reliable delivery for commercialauthoritative communications, its uses include terrorist warnings, "eyes-only" messages, military execution orders, intelligence information, overflight clearances, and government entities across the globe that seek continuous compliance with cybersecurityEmergency Action Messages for nuclear command and risk management frameworkscontrol. Information exchanged at this level and standards.for these purposes requires operational requirements for time-sensitive, guaranteed delivery, precedence, high availability, and reliability.

Telos Ghost® 

Advanced Cyber Analytics ("Telos Ghost Overview

As cyber threats have increased in scope and scale and the consequences of hacks and breaches have grown, we have developedACA"): a solution that enables organizationsis a dynamic, proprietary threat feed source of global Internet Protocol ("IP") addresses known to work onengage in potentially malicious activity, including mass scanning and generic opportunistic attacks. Telos ACA™ allows security operation centers the internet withoutadvantage of being detected. In 2018, we introduced able to reduce "noisy" IP security threat alerts and thereby increase operational efficiency, the ability to potentially identify forthcoming mass exploitation events, and the ability to improve the focus of ongoing threat hunts.
6

Table of Contents
Telos ACA leverages a sophisticated global sensor network of nodes that run 24/7/365 and analyzes and aggregates anomalous Internet activity in near real time. Telos ACA intelligence is seamlessly and conveniently delivered as an industry-standard Structured Threat Information eXpression/Trusted Automated eXchange of Intelligence Information ("STIX/TAXII") based threat feed. STIX states the "what" of threat intelligence, while TAXII defines "how" that information is relayed. STIX and TAXII are machine-readable and, therefore, easily automated. This allows for easy consumption into third-party security tools, where the threat feed can be used to enrich and provide relevant information related to potential malicious network activity within environments. Telos ACA provides the IP, metadata, and raw data elements to improve threat hunting and eliminate threat noise.
Telos Ghost which allows our customers to shield communications, transactions, and even their very presence on the web from the view of cyber adversaries.

Conceived on the notion that “you can’t exploit what you can’t see,” Telos Ghost provides organizations a virtually anonymous way to do business, connect with global resources, and conduct research online. Telos Ghost is ®: a virtual obfuscation network-as-a-service that:

obscureswith encryption and varies network pathwaysmanaged attribution capabilities to prevent adversaries from tracking usersensure the safety and information.
uses multiple layersprivacy of encryption to protectpeople, information, and remove source and destination IP addresses, eliminating network paths back toresources on the source.
enables users to manage their technical and non-technical persona to disguise their identity and location.
hides critical network resources using cloaked capabilities for email, storage, unified communications, and other applications.

network. Telos Ghost seeks to eliminate cyber-attackcyberattack surfaces by obfuscating and encrypting data, masking user identity and location, and hiding network resources. It provides the additional layers of security and privacy needed for intelligence gathering, cyber threat protection, securing critical infrastructure, and protecting communications and applications when a single error in security can jeopardize operations, property, and even lives can be jeopardized by a single error in security.

7

Table of Contents
lives. Telos Ghost Critical Capabilities

Private Web Access: Secure anonymous Internet access. Telos Ghost disguises the identity and locationis used for a variety of personnel when using the public web forhighly sensitive applications, including cyber threat research, open-source intelligence, and competitive research. It provides users with dynamic access for every session and assures that traffic securely traverses the virtual private lines of Telos Ghost. Scalable and flexible, Telos Ghost Private Web Access allows users multiple points of international or domestic egress to the public internet based on customer requirements. Traffic mixing and misdirection techniques are designed to ensure that activity remains anonymous, obscure and private.
Private Network Access: Leased-line security with VPN flexibility. This capability is designed to allow authorized users to work with mission-critical enterprise information without being seen or discovered. It enables the establishment of sustainable cybersecurity infrastructure, providing multi-layered secure tunnels for data traffic and obscuring the correlation between the entry doorways and the client cloud from external observers. Software and system agnostic and accessible from nearly any device and location, Telos Ghost Private Network Access is designed to provide a full security solution while maintaining existing encryption and software services.
Cloaked Services: Hidden unified mobile communications, storage, and applications. Telos Ghost also provides remote users with the ability to securely talk, text, email, store information, and use video and applications over nearly any mobile device. These abilities include fully encrypted geo-masked hidden mobile communications for device-agnostic voice, video, chat, and data; hidden storage to store, analyze, and collaborate privately and securely within Telos Ghost; and hidden email and applications that cloaks the servers for access only by Telos Ghost users.

Telos Ghost Applications

Cyber threat research. Telos Ghost provides members of a U.S. government organization with an isolated networking infrastructure that enables red team members to operate securely and privately without attracting unwanted attention.
Open source intelligence. A U.S. government organization uses Telos Ghost to securely conduct open source cyber threat intelligence analysis.
Supplysupply chain security vulnerability assessment,. A security company that vets the vulnerability of supply chains in the Defense Industrial Base uses Telos Ghost to inspect the digital connections of the supply chain online, safe from observation by adversaries that might otherwise evade discovery.
Worldwide worldwide investigative and recovery services. A commercial firm uses Telos Ghost for cloaked online research and voice communications over mobile devices to enable secure, privatized communications as they track and recover property from nefarious actors.

Telos AMHS

Telos AMHS is used by military field operatives for critical communications on the battlefield. Since 1999, it has been one of our signature security solutions and has been one of the most widely used organizational messaging products in DoD and other agencies charged with defending U.S. national security.

Telos AMHS is designed to support a range of secure messaging services to a worldwide community of U.S. military, government, and allied customers operating in both strategic and tactical environments. It is used to securely transmit messages that provide direction and establish a formal position, commitment, or response requiring the authority of an organization, rather than an individual, including:

Military command and control;
Cross-border authorizations;
Exchanges between military forces of sovereign nations;
High-level policy, procedure, or directives; and
Response to legal, sensitive, or personnel matters.

Because Telos AMHS supports timely and reliable delivery for authoritative communications, its uses include terrorist warnings, “eyes-only” messages, military execution orders, intelligence information, overflight clearances, and Emergency Action Messages for nuclear command and control. Information exchange at this level and for these purposes requires operational requirements for time-sensitive, guaranteed delivery, precedence, high availability, and reliability.

Telos AMHS is the only web-based solution for assured messaging and directory services using the DISA’s Organizational Messaging Service and its specialized communications protocols. With Telos AMHS, users are able to send and receive rich-text messages across security domains and in different formats using plain language addressing. Users can search messages, archive messages, and send attachments up to 200MB to accommodate photos and videos, including those of terrorists, most wanted notices, maps, and satellite images.

More than fifty organizations around the world depend on Telos AMHS, including the Joint Staff, combatant commands, military services, defense agencies, federal agencies, and the IC. Telos AMHS provides a proven return on investment over alternative organizational messaging offerings and has been implemented on a SaaS basis by an increasing number of organizations.

8

Table of Contents
Telos ID Identity Offerings

Telos ID Overview

Telos ID provides trusted identity and digital services that are critical for the delivery of vital citizen services that millions of Americans rely on each year. Access to these vital services requires a robust and reliable infrastructure comprised of advanced technologies, facilities, and professional staff members that can effectively deliver these services around the world.

We have transformed the Telos ID business model by leveraging a SaaS approach. We utilize our partnerships with AWS and ServiceNow, and we have fully integrated a robust suite of customer service, cybersecurity, and performance monitoring tools that align with DHS’s Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation (“CDM”) Program that are designed to enable us to quickly deliver SaaS or turn-key solutions to our federal customers. Our digital platform extends web, mobile, and client applications that also drive professional services, and product licensing opportunities. Our services are differentiated because our back-end system is intended to interface withhiding critical homeland security and law enforcement systems and are tightly coupled with a mature, modern cloud-based platform that can scale to support large federal, state, local, and commercial programs.assets.

Digital Identity Solutions:
We maintain government certifications and designations that distinguish Telos ID, including TSA PreCheckIDTrust360® enrollment provider, Designated Aviation Channeling provider, FBI-approved Channeler, and the FINRA Electronic Fingerprint Submission provider. We are the only commercial entity in our industry designated as a Secure Flight Services provider for terrorist watchlist checks.

Our strategic partners offer retail and on-demand service channels that further differentiate our offerings. Our established global logistics infrastructure provides responsive supply chain support. We operate a full-service call center with chat-bots, AI, and virtual agent support, all of which contribute to scalability. Our network and security operations centers align with U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team and CDM best practices.

Telos ID Applications and Use Cases

U.S. Military ID. For more than 25 years, Telos ID’s identity trust services have provided access to health care, commissary services, and critical defense resources for more than 2,000,000 military members, their dependents, and civilian employees through use of the Common Access Card (“CAC”). We operate more than 250,000 components that comprise 7,000 end-user systems deployed around the world to nearly 2,000 military installations. We provide near real-time data collection support on personnel movement and location information for operating forces, government civil servants, and government contractors in specified operational theaters. This system has captured over 636,000,000 scans of government, U.S. military, and contractor personnel since its inception. Our logistics infrastructure provides responsive 24-hour delivery of components to our warfighters deployed across the globe, and we custom-build our identity, credentialing, and access management solutions to function effectively in austere environments that demand reliability and performance at all times.

TSA Airport Employee Vetting. Historically, more than 300,000,000 airline passengers’ travel experiences have been handled by more than 1,500,000 aviation workers who are screened through Telos ID’s aviation channeling service. As one of only two authorized aviation channeling providers in the market, we offer our aviation partners innovative biometric, identity trust, and customer service technologies that are critical to the operation of more than half of the largest airports in the nation. We actively support nearly 100 commercial airports, airlines, and general aviation customers, and our Independent Secure Flight Vetting technology provides a secure vetting service for non-travelers who need to access secure areas of: an airport. We were the first commercial company in the United States to implement the FBI’s Rap Back service, enabling our aviation partners to perform continuous monitoring for insider threat detection.

U.S. Census Bureau Enumerator Screening. For the 2020 U.S. Census, we have processed more than 1,000,000 enumerators through our 1,100 identity service centers. Telos ID extends digital identity verification, fingerprinting, and photo services across the nation in support of 2020 Census hiring initiatives. We custom designed and deployed more than 1,300 desktop, kiosk, and mobile workstations that are operated by thousands of Census-cleared staff members. At the peak, Telos ID’s managed service supported more than 30,000 appointments per day, and our customer call center handled more than 35,000 daily calls at the peak.

TSA PreCheck® Enrollment Screening. Telos ID’s recent award of a 10-year contract to provide enrollment services in support of the TSA PreCheck® Enrollment Program presents a large, high-profile opportunity for us, and we are preparing to launch services under this program in early 2021. The TSA PreCheck® contract is an important example of a government-sponsored, consumer facing opportunity, in which we provide PreCheck® enrollment services to individual, fee-paying applicants. Telos ID’s service will engage with the world’s leading airline, hospitality, credit card, ride share, and other Fortune 500 businesses to provide consumer marketing and loyalty program tie-ins to promote the PreCheck® program. In addition, this program is expected to feature an omni-channel market approach that leverages advanced digital services to reach our customers across several market segments.

9

Table of Contents
CMS Healthcare Provider Screening. Telos ID was recently awarded a 10-year contract to provide technology and service solutions that detect, prevent, and proactively deter fraud, waste and abuse in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Telos ID’s digital identity trust platform and digital services is expected to offer critical technology necessary to identify and mitigate fraud across the United States. Each year, approximately 1,500,000 health care providers are required to undergo FBI-based non-criminal history checks requiring identity trust services, including identity verification, fingerprinting, and continuous monitoring.

Telos ID'senterprise digital trusted identity risk platform -- IDTrust360® --for extending flexible hybrid cloud identity services. This platform is enabled for mobile, enterprise environments and custom digital identity services that mitigate threats by integrating advanced technologies that fuse biometrics, credentials, and other identity-centric data used to continuously monitor trust. IDTrust360 is a leading, fully integrated suite containing IoT, Machine Learning (ML), AI, and other advanced cloud-hosted products and services that deliver identity trust, multi-modal biometric capture and matching, identity assurance, identity vetting, document validation, credentialing, personnel security, case management, call center support, cyber security, network and security operations, service management, integrated logistics, and numerous other features and functions. Its open architecture is supported by a flexible API gateway and a robust workflow engine that can efficiently extend individual services or offer the entire platform as a SaaS or turn-key solution for our customers. IDTrust360® is the only commercially owned and operated platform on the market with direct interfaces to the FBI'sFederal Bureau of Investigation's ("FBI") criminal records, DHS'sDepartment of Homeland Security's ("DHS") terrorist watch list service, U.S. Department of Treasury's pay.gov, other government identity risk management systems, and numerous commercial identity, intelligence, and risk-based data sources. We are actively engagedengage with federal customers to integrate vital event records, government identification document records, and other fingerprint-based biometric records hosted across multiple agencies. This enables Telos ID exclusively to offer NIST-compliant digital identity services aligned with federal security mandates. IDTrust360
ONYX® extends web,: the world's first and most accurate touchless fingerprint biometric solution for mobile devices. Powered by state-of-the-art machine learning, ONYX eases deployment in a variety of industries, including financial services and clienthealthcare, and applications withinlike consumer authentication and physical access and security. Acquired by Telos in 2021, the patented and award-winning ONYX solution delivers touchless fingerprint biometrics that people can submit simply by using their mobile phones. In June 2022, ONYX won first place in the overall competition of the Mobile Fingerprint Information Technology Challenge hosted by the NIST.
We maintain government certifications and designations that distinguish Telos ID, including TSA PreCheck® enrollment provider, Aviation Channeling Services ("ACS") provider, FBI-approved Channeler, and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Electronic Fingerprint Submission provider.
Secure Networks Segment:
With a fully integrated low-code development environment for rapid application development. The environment meets FISMA High certification standardsfocus on enterprise security, the Secure Networks segment provides secure networking architectures and is NIST SP 800-53 certified within multiple federal agencies, while boasting 99.998% availability performancesolutions to our customers through secure mobility solutions and enterprise-level scalability. IDTrust360® leverages leading cybernetwork management and defense services. Our net-centric solutions enable collaboration and connectivity to increase efficiency, reduce costs, and improve mission outcomes. Telos provides an extensive range of wired and wireless, fixed and deployable, classified and unclassified voice, data, and video secure network solutions and services to support defense and civilian missions. Capabilities include network design, operations, and sustainment, system integration and engineering, network security and network monitoring tools aligned with DHS Continuous Diagnostics & Mitigationcompliance, deployable comms, service desk, defensive cyber operations, and industry best practicesprogram management. Secure Networks represented 46.7% and 44.5% of total revenues for strengthening network defensethe years ended December 31, 2023 and enhancing2022, respectively.
These are our solutions and services in our Secure Networks segment:
Secure Mobility: solutions for business and government that enable remote work and minimize operational and security concerns across and beyond the resiliency of our infrastructure necessary for managing and protecting millions of identity records, sensitive information, and end-point hardware components deployed across thousands of sites around the world for customers operating within defense, homeland security and law enforcement, financial, health, commerce, transportation, retail, and other market segments.

Secure Mobility

Nearly 20 years ago, we were the first non-government solutions provider to receive approval to design and deliver secure wireless solutions to DoD. That authorization to operate enabled us to build a very large footprint within DoD and the U.S. Air Force. As a result, we have a long track record of enabling our customers to work remotely and securely. Given the depth of our relationships, when one of our customers elects to modernize its remote mobility infrastructure, it frequently chooses to work with us. Within the U.S. Air Force and supporting DoD communities, we have designed and delivered enterprise-level secure mobile networks on every active duty, Air National Guard, and Air Force Reserve site worldwide.

enterprise. Our secure mobility team brings credentials to every engagement, supplying deep expertise and experience, as well as highly desirable clearances and industry recognizedindustry-recognized certifications for network engineering, mobility, and security. We also foster and maintain key industry partnerships, offering insight into technology advances and early access to newoffer secure mobility solutions.

Network Managementprofessional services, such as consulting and Defense

On a managed basis, we offer a broad suite ofdeployment services, needed to operate, administer, and defend complex enterprise networks, giving our customers the benefit of these capabilities without having to commit to the cost and burden of providing the services for themselves. We have the expertise to manage and defend large-scale enterprises and have been successful at hiring and retaining personnel with the necessary key skills and security clearances.

Our Competitive Strengths

Leading cybersecurity company with a long history of providing securitydeliver integrated communications solutions tothat meet even the most sophisticated customers. We have been providing security solutions, specializing in the areacomplex needs of cybersecurity, since 1995. Our customers include some of the most security-conscious organizations in the world, including the IC. For example, we believe that our award-winning Xacta offering is the dominant commercial risk management solution in the federal government space and is increasingly being adopted in the commercial sphere, notably by leading cloud providers such as AWS and Microsoft Azure. Additionally, Telos Ghost gives organizations and individuals the ability to hide in plain sight, eliminating attack vectors from hackers through obfuscation and mis-attribution. And, we believe our Telos ID identity offerings are market disruptors that present large opportunities for growth.

Superior security solutions and capabilities. Our solutions are designed for both governmentcivilian, defense, and commercial industries and are configured to operate in highly sensitive, highly classified environments, serving some of the most demanding, secure organizations in the world. Our solutions are flexible, and can be deployed in various ways, including on premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid or multi-cloud environments.


customers.
7
10

Table of Contents

Proven abilityNetwork Management and Defense: services for operating, administrating, and defending complex enterprise networks and services for defensive cyber operations. Our diverse network management and defense capabilities address common and uncommon requirements in many industries and disciplines, from military to wingovernment agencies. Telos network engineers, security specialists, and retain large contracts and enterprise-level deals, providing clear visibility into future revenue and profitability. We have over 20 active acquisition contracts and vehicles, thousands of active contracts and purchase orders, and more than 350 customers in each of the last three years. These contracts, vehicles and customers present a solid platform for growth. As but one example, we have provided IT security support to the Defense Manpower Data Center (“DMDC”) under a variety of contract vehicles since 1995, and this program accounts for annual revenue at a historical average of approximately $28 million over the last five years. We also have proven repeatedly our ability to deploy our security solutions at the enterprise level for both federal and commercial organizations. These long-term contract relationships provide predictable, recurring revenue at attractive margins.

Our substantial investments into technology and automation can be expanded beyond our core market. Our solutions are built to help our customers be more secure, more efficient, and more effective. We have made investments across the company to take advantage of efficiencies and automation through scalable security solutions that are market driven and market proven. In contrast to traditional cybersecurity businesses with a focus on government customers, we own the intellectual property developed through our R&D initiatives and can deploy our technology solutions across our entire public and private sector customer set. The ability to offer our solutions beyond the U.S. federal government sphere is a key enabler of our strategy to grow and expand our relationships with commercial customers.

Strong relationships with our customers. We are a customer-centric organization and pride ourselves on our close customer relationships. We have longstanding relationships with DoD, civilian agencies of the federal government, and the IC that date back more than two decades. Since 1995, our security solutions have been adopted by many defense, intelligence, civilian agency, and commercial customers, and we believe that the Telos brand has become synonymous with trust.

Respected, experienced management team. Our executive officers have an average tenure at Telos of approximately 21 years. The team is comprised of personnel with extensive military, federal government, and commercial backgrounds who are directly familiar with customer needs. Our management team also includes senior professionals whomanagers are experienced with advanced DoD and federal networks and are certified in developing commercial software solutionsthe leading tools, technologies, and leading technical teams throughoutbest practices for network management and administration. We ensure the development process.

COVID-resistant business. We support mission critical operations. Becauseconsistency and continuity of this and the growth of remote workforces as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we believe, based upon our 2020 financial performance to date, that our business is relatively COVID resistant. Additionally, the automation provided by our solutions can help customers do more with less as they are forced to downsize their staffs because of the pandemic. Automation is now even more critical to efficiently manage a business, including with respect to cyber risk and regulatory compliance, which should resultnetwork management services required in additional demand for our security solutions.

today's mission-critical network environments.
Our Growth Strategies

We are pursuing multiple strategies in order to grow the company,Company in both our commercial and government business end marketsmarkets. Our key growth strategies include:
Broaden reach within the U.S. federal government. We have historically focused on the U.S. federal government and believe we are an established leader in providing security solutions to federal agencies, including DoD and the IC. Nonetheless, we believe the U.S. federal government continues to represent a significant growth opportunity, and we expect to continue to invest in products and solutions to serve additional customers within the U.S. federal government.
For example, Xacta is included on DHS's Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation Approved Products List to provide federal agencies with innovative security tools, which we believe presents us with an excellent opportunity to pursue contracts with additional federal agencies. In addition, our platform is available for use in the United StatesAWS GovCloud (U.S.), Oracle and abroad. Our key strategies are:Azure Government. The Telos ACA offering is positioned to supply unique data sets to government agencies, allowing them to be better informed as they defend and protect their networks and assets. Telos ACA is also positioned to provide government customers with specific, actionable and high-fidelity intelligence about malicious cyber activity targeted at their networks.

Leverage our diverse security solutions to expand our presence in commercial markets. Our offerings are designed to have broad applicationapplications and include security risk and compliance, secure messaging, identity vetting, and managed attribution and obfuscation. We believe that we are well-positioned to sell our capabilities into a dynamic and growing commercial opportunity set and to innovatewill continue innovating to address emerging and unique requirements.
For example, we have leveraged core Xacta functionality to meet the needs of large financial services and CRMcustomer relationship management firms. We have also leveraged our U.S. federal government identity management qualifications to improve the speed and accuracy of vetting results for nearlymore than 100 airports, air carriers, and general aviation across the country. We intend to continue to innovateinnovating and are developing additional offerings for cloud, mobile, and IoTInternet of Things ("IoT") devices.

Grow our revenue and expand margins by building robust sales channels. In recent years, we have formed an inside sales organization that serves as both the direct channel to a wider account universe and an effective and efficient training program to grow our field sales organization. We plan to expand our partner program to include a variety of channels, including resellers, integrators, and contract partners to help us more quickly gain access to new markets, particularly commercial and international. For example, both Telos Ghost and Xacta are now available through various AWS and Microsoft Azure marketplaces, serving regions around the world and markets requiring varying levels of security. We plan to grow our direct sales team and to accelerate the expansion of these channel partner initiatives, which we anticipate will drive revenue growth and material gross margin expansion.

Target and replace inefficient legacy products. Recognizing the limitations of their legacy systems, organizations are replacing existing systems and processes with ourTelos solutions.
For example, Telos AMHS is a web-centric system that replaced legacy capabilities like communications centers for the purpose of executing operational orders (through organizational messaging) across the U.S. federal government and around the world. Xacta has disrupted the cyber risk and compliance management business across the U.S. federal government, replacing tedious manual activity with automation and delivering that automation to meet our customer’scustomer's needs flexibly on premises,on-premises, in hybrid environments, in the cloud, and across multi-cloud infrastructures.


11

Table of Contents

Broaden reach within the U.S. federal government. We have historically focused on the U.S. federal government and believe that we are an established leader in providing security solutions to federal agencies, including DoD and the IC. Nonetheless, we believe the U.S. federal government represents a significant growth opportunity, and we expect to continue to invest in products to serve additional customers in this vertical. For example, Xacta is included on DHS’s CDM Approved Products List to provide federal agencies with innovative security tools, which we believe presents us with an excellent opportunity to pursue contracts with additional federal agencies. In addition, our platform is available for use in the AWS GovCloud (US) and Azure Government.

Expand our international footprint. We are expanding our international operations and intend to invest globally to broaden our international footprint. We are currently working with countries such as Canada, Singapore, Australia, and Bahrain to offer Xacta to address cyber risk and compliance management capabilities. We are also working to expand AMHS to all NATO countries and to offer Telos Ghost internationally. We intend to grow our international customer base by increasing our investments in overseas operations, establishing channel partners, and adding personnel in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia-Pacific.

Pursue strategic acquisition opportunities. We believe that our markets remain fragmented, with many niche players providing limited product solutions targeting narrow customer segments. Given the breadth of our solution set and our customer end markets, we believe that we are well-positioned to opportunistically acquire smaller companies and incorporate their technology or deploy their solutions across a larger customer set. We believe that a targeted and opportunistic acquisition strategy will complementbe a force multiplier for our significant organic growth opportunity.
Customers
Our primary customers include the U.S. federal government, large commercial businesses, state and local governments, and international customers. Our consolidated revenues are largely attributable to prime contracts or to subcontracts with our contractors engaged in work for the U.S. government, with the remaining attributable to state and local governments, and commercial markets.
Our security solutions are the product of the extensive labor investment in developing our intellectual property and highly sophisticated software technology. These investments helped us expand with commercial customers, and win additional contracts within the military, the IC and civilian government agencies. Once our security solutions are embedded in our customers' technology infrastructure, these customer relationships often expand and lead to opportunities to provide additional security solutions.
8

Table of Contents

Our U.S. federal government customers include the DoD, the Central Intelligence Agency, and multiple other agencies within the IC, and multiple civilian agencies, including but not limited to, the DHS, the U.S. Department of State, the FBI, and the Department of Health and Human Services. These customers have a number of subsidiary agencies with separate budgets and procurement functions. Our contracts may be with the highest level of these agencies or with the subsidiary agencies of these customers.
Our commercial customers include leading enterprises such as Amazon.com, Inc., Google, Zscaler, Ernst & Young, Deloitte, Accenture, SAP, Verizon and Oracle.
Sales and Marketing

As part of our sales and marketing investments, we also make corporate investments in functional areas such as contracts, solution architects, lead generation tools, and operations to ensure our back-office systems and processes scale for business growth.
Sales
We typically focusexpanded our sales capability for markets in which we are well known, such as the U.S. government, certain critical infrastructure sectors, and certain commercial verticals such as healthcare and financial services. We added commission incentivized sales personnel aligned to market segments focused on largethe U.S. federal government, the IC and commercial organizations that have demanding security requirements and/or complex cyber security risk and compliance management objectives.

the DoD market areas.
Customer acquisition often involves extensive interaction at all levels of the organizationsan organization, from usersexecutives, to executives and decision makers.makers, to end users. We seek to forge relationships throughout an organization in an effort to obtain broad consensus as part of the sales process. Currently,We leverage the customer acquisition process is largely driven by direct sales activity.

As a resultfull power of the long tenure of many of our employees, many of ourTelos (executives, sales and business development executives have trusted relationships that have developed over many years. We augment these trusted relationships with senior leaders who have retired from the military, civil service,industry partners) to gain access and various related industries. Many of these individuals arebuild our employees. These leaders provide our sales team with access to high level contacts that would be difficult to achieve otherwise.

Our sales executives are supported by an inside sales team that works with the Telos marketing team on various awareness campaigns where sales leads are obtained, vetted, and pursued via proactive outreach (calls, email, etc.).

Metrics are tracked using a formal CRM process and used to equip the sales executives with useful sales data. Our sales team works hand in hand with our marketing team and various subject matter experts to develop target awareness campaigns for our various solutions that generate valuable leads and contacts.

brand awareness.
Our sales strategy is to establish a customer foothold with one of our solutions and work to achieve rapid success. We then leverage this customer relationship to expand usage ofgenerate interest in other solutions from the Telos solutions.portfolio. We have a variety of upsell opportunities that allow us to expand our presence within a customer account. For example, there are various complementary Xacta features that build on each other and are sold separately. Additionally,
Much of our sales teambusiness is responsible for selling all Telos solutions. This allowsawarded through the submission of formal competitive bids; however, a sales executive to quickly identify demand for other Telos solutions in existing accounts.portion of our revenue is awarded through limited competition or sole-source contracts.

Partner Organizations
Our sales team also works with partner organizations like AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Rackspace Technology, Inc.Oracle to pursue mutual customers. These relationships represent our current channel sales strategy that we arecustomers and leverage their marketplace platforms and marketing programs. In the past years, Telos announced a collaboration with IBM Security as part of IBM's Active Governance Services, which allows enterprises to operationalize and automate activities and solve challenges in cybersecurity compliance and regulatory risks. The solution combines IBM's world-class expertise in cyber compliance and governance programs with Telos' Xacta IT risk management platform to automate the processtime-consuming aspects of expanding. We are also actively working with Singapore Technologies Engineering, Limited, which is helping us gain access to the Asian market for cyber security solutions.
We plan to expand our direct sales capability for markets in which we are well-known,compliance and audit activities such as the U.S. government, certain critical infrastructure sectors,control selection, validation, reporting, and certain commercial verticals like healthcare and financial services. We also plan to expand our channel sales capability to gain rapid access to other commercial verticals and international markets.monitoring.

We will be increasing our investment in sales and marketing with the goal of increasing sales of our security solutions and acquiring customers in a variety of verticals. In 2021, we are planning on implementing an approximate 300% increase from our 2020 sales and marketing investment. We currently have less than 10 salespeople at Telos who carry quotas that they are expected to meet. We plan on adding direct, quota-driven, in-house sales assets to focus on commercial accounts. We will focus Xacta and Telos Ghost sales efforts in the banking/financial services and insurance sector, healthcare, energy, and other critical infrastructure protection markets. We will also be investing in additional lead generation tools, financial incentives and marketing programs.

12

Our partner program will include a variety of channels, including resellers, technical/integrators, and consulting partners to help us accelerate access and implementations in new markets, particularly commercial and international. Currently, we participate in Microsoft and AWS partner programs, which incentivize their respective sellers to promote Telos security solutions (e.g., Xacta and Telos Ghost).

As part of the sales and channel program investment, we are also making corporate investments in functional areas such as contracts, solution architects and operations.

Much of our business is awarded through submission of formal competitive bids, though about 50% is awarded through limited competition or sole source contracts.

Marketing
We build market awareness of Telos and our solutions through a variety of marketing programs, including regular briefings with industry analysts, public relations activities, government relations initiatives, web seminars, trade show exhibitions, speaking engagements, and web sitedigital marketing. We will be making additional investmentscontinue investing in these types of activities and targeting additional vertical specificvertical-specific content creation, targeted advertising and brand awareness campaigns, social media campaigns, and search engine marketing. When appropriate, we will engage
Our sales team works hand in joint marketing activitieshand with our channel, technologymarketing team and consulting partners.various subject matter experts to develop targeted awareness campaigns for our various solutions that generate valuable leads and contacts.

Competition

Research and Development
We operate in a highly competitive marketplace. There are other companies that provide solutions similar to ours. Although these companies provide offerings that overlap with some of our solutions, we are not aware of any single company that provides competitivedeveloped proprietary software-based solutions in allvarious platforms related to security and cyber risk management. We invest substantial resources in research and development to innovate new solutions, enhance our offerings and grow opportunities by developing new features and modules for our existing platforms. In 2023, we invested in preexisting programs and next generation solutions in secure communications and cybersecurity. Leveraging our agile innovation and development practices, we rapidly establish prototypes that we can fully test for suitability and to pre-establish enterprise risk level across a variety of the areas where we compete. The primary companies with whichgovernment networks and clouds. We are committed to and view our solutions compete range from security solutionscontinued investment in research and software organizations suchdevelopment as CLEAR (operated by Alclear, LLC), Cutting Edge, IDEMIA, MetricStream Inc., Palantir Technologies Inc., RSA Archer, ServiceNow, Inc., and Unisys Corporation,a key factor to more traditional government services integrators that provide products and services such as Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., General Dynamics Corporation, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, and Science Applications International Corporation.our long-term business success.

9

Table of Contents
The majority of our business is in response to competitive requests from potential and current customers. Decisions regarding contract awards by our customers typically are based upon an assessment of the quality of our past performance, responsiveness to proposal requirements, uniqueness of the offering itself, price, and other competitive factors.

Aside from other companies that compete in our space, we sometimes face indirect competition from solutions that are developed “in-house” by some of our customers.

Our People and Culture

Human Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2020,2023, we had 785619 employees, of whichwhom approximately 60%88.7% are located in the United States. Approximately 377 of our U.S.-based employees held U.S. security clearances.clearances, and 26% self-identify as veterans of U.S. military service. Our employees are not represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We have not experienced any work stoppages, and we consider relations with our employees to be good.

Our people are proficient in many fields such as computer science, information security and vulnerability testing, networking technologies, physics, engineering, operations research, mathematics, economics, and business administration. We placeTelos places a high valuestrong emphasis on supporting our people. As a result, we seek to remain competitive in terms of salary structures, incentive compensation programs, fringe benefits, opportunities for growth, and individual recognition and award programs.

Our management team is committed to maintaining a corporate culture that fosters mutual respect and job satisfaction for our people while delivering innovation and value to customers and shareholders. This commitment is reflected in our core values.values:

Always with integrity, at Telos we:

Build trusted relationships,
Work hard together,
Design and deliver superior solutions, and
Have fun doing it.

These values are woven throughout the fabric of Telos. They are reflected in our hiring practices, reinforced regularly, and reviewed during appraisals. They are written into annual and quarterly objectives for staff and managers alike, as well as department and company business goals. Employees are encouraged to challenge themselves and each other to exhibit the core values in everydayall activities.

Our employees also are given avenues of communication and interaction should they observe activities that are inconsistent with our core values. EncouragedWhile employees are encouraged first to speak openly about any issues, a 24/7 hotline provides an opportunity to express concerns anonymously.

We consider the foundational value of integrity to be a non-negotiable requirement of employment, and an expectation of suppliers, partners, and our customers. We guard our reputation and will take aggressivenecessary action to protect it. An essential part of our brand promise is that we always to engage employees, customers, partners, suppliers, and investors with integrity.

As part of our effort to improve our disclosures around human capital issues, in 2023, we provided a public report pursuant to the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board ("SASB") Software & IT Service Standard, which report addresses, in part, metrics relating to recruiting and managing a global, diverse and skilled workforce.
Talent Acquisition and Retention
We operate in a very competitive environment for talent. To ensure we can attract the most well-qualified employees, we employ strategic sourcing methods, innovative recruitment campaigns, and inclusive outreach initiatives to attract a diverse pool of candidates. This involves leveraging various channels, such as job boards, social media platforms, and diversity-focused partnerships, to engage with candidates from different backgrounds and experiences.
During 2023, we made several improvements to our employee value proposition, including enhancements on benefits available to employees, increasing paid time off and parental leave, accelerating the vesting period for stock matched by the Company in employees' 401(k) plans, instituting a new performance management program, and various supplemental programs to support our employees' physical, mental and financial well-being.
In addition, at Telos, we help our employees succeed by providing flexibility in where and how they work. The employees' ability to work remotely or in a hybrid arrangement is a strategy that helps us attract, hire and retain the best people, regardless of their specific location. This strategy increases employee empowerment and satisfaction, drives efficiency, and enables us to hire from a broad and diverse talent pool.
Diversity and Inclusion
We value diversity and inclusion and are committed to providing a work environment free of discrimination and harassment, where our employees can do their best work, bring their whole selves to work, feel supported, and in turn, support others. We strive to create a working environment where everyone feels included and respected and has an equal opportunity to contribute. We believe that diverse teams maximize their potential and bring with them varied views, experiences, and perspectives. While we believe that our employee population is gender and ethnically diverse for our industry and operating markets, with approximately 25% of our global population self-identifying as female and approximately 38% self-identifying as underrepresented minorities, our objective is to continue to improve our hiring, development, training, advancement, and retention of diverse talent and to foster an inclusive environment at Telos.
10
13

Seasonality
We generally experience seasonality due to our key customers' fiscal year ends and procurement cycles. We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from the U.S. government, whose fiscal year ends on September 30 of each year, which may favorably impact our third fiscal quarter. In addition, our quarterly results may be impacted by the number of working days in a given quarter. See "Risk Factors — We are subject to the seasonality of U.S. government spending."
Government Contracts and Regulation

Our business is heavily regulated. Weregulated and we must comply with and are affected by laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of U.S. Governmentgovernment and other contracts. U.S. government contracts generally are subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation ("FAR"), which sets forth policies, procedures and requirements for acquiring goods and services by the U.S. government, and agency-specific regulations that implement or supplement the FAR. These regulations impose a broad range of requirements, many of which are unique to government contracting, including various procurement, security, contract pricing and cost, contract termination, and adjustments and audit requirements. These laws and regulations, among other things:

imposeImpose specific and unique cost accounting practices that may differ from Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP" or "GAAP") and therefore require reconciliation;

Define allowable and unallowable costs and otherwise govern our right to reimbursement under various cost-type U.S. government contracts;
impose acquisition regulations that define reimbursableRequire compliance with U.S. government Cost Accounting Standards;
Require reviews by the Defense Contract Audit Agency, Defense Contract Management Agency and non-reimbursable costs;other U.S. government agencies for compliance with government requirements for a contractor's business system; and

restrictRestrict the use and dissemination of, and require the protection of, unclassified contract-related information and information classified for national security purposes and the export of certain products and technical data.

U.S. government customers employ several contracting methods to purchase services and products. Budgetary pressures and reforms in the procurement process have caused many U.S. government customers to increasingly purchase services and products using contracting methods that allow them to select multiple contract winners or pre-qualify certain contractors to provide services or products on established general terms and conditions rather than through single-award contracts. The predominant contracting methods through which U.S. government agencies procure services and products include definitive award contracts, indefinite delivery / indefinite quantity ("IDIQ") contracts, U.S. General Service Administration ("GSA") schedule contracts and other transactional agreements ("OTA").
Government contracts are subject to congressional funding. Consequently, at the outset of a program, a contract is usually partially funded, and Congress annually determines if additional funds are to be appropriated to the contract. All of our government customers have the right to terminate their contract with us at their convenience or in the event that we default.

Most of our contracts have cancellation terms that permit us to recover all or a portion of our incurred costs and fees for work performed where the U.S. government issues a termination for convenience.
A portion of our business is classified by the U.S. Governmentgovernment and cannot be specifically described. The operating results of these classified programs are included in our consolidated financial statements.

These regulations and risks are described in more detail below under "Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Backlog

Environmental, Social, and Governance Matters
We developstrive to operate our annual budgeted revenue by estimatingbusiness in an environmentally responsible manner and in support of sustainable long-term financial performance. Our Environmental, Social and Governance ("ESG") task force is charged with addressing climate and environmentally-related risks and opportunities, including our publicly-disclosed climate transition plan. The Company publicly reports certain climate change-related information via CDP and provides public sustainability disclosures using the SASB Software & IT Service Standard. By making these disclosures, however, we have not concluded that the information disclosed is material to our business. The Board of Directors authorized the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to oversee the Company's ESG efforts, which include climate-related risks and opportunities.
See Item 1A, "Risk Factors," for the upcoming year our continuing business from existing customersdiscussion of risks related to global climate and active contracts. We consider backlog, both funded and unfunded (as explained below), other expected annual renewals, and expansion planned by our current customers. In the context of our current customer portfolio, we view “recurring revenue” as revenue that occurs often and repeatedly. In each of the last three years, recurring revenue has exceeded 85% of our annual revenue. Our total budgeted revenue is the combination of recurring revenue and a forecast of new business.

Total backlog, a component of recurring revenue, consists of the aggregate contract revenues remaining to be earned by us at a given time over the life of our contracts, whether funded or unfunded. Funded backlog consists of the aggregate contract revenues remaining to be earned at a given time, which, in the case of U.S. government contracts, means that they have been funded by the procuring agency. Unfunded backlog is the difference between total backlog and funded backlog and includes potential revenues that may be earned if customers exercise delivery orders and/or renewal options to continue these contracts. Based on historical experience, we generally assume option year renewals to be exercised. Most of our customers fund contracts on a basis of one year or less and, as a result, funded backlog is generally expected to be earned within one year from any point in time, whereas unfunded backlog is expected to be earned over a longer period.

ESG matters.
11
14

Company Website and Available Information
Our corporate headquarters is located at 19886 Ashburn Road, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, and our telephone number is (703) 724-3800. Our website can be accessed at www.telos.com, which contains information about our Company and operations. Through a link on the Investor Relations section of our website, copies of each of our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") can be viewed and downloaded free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports and amendments are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into and is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The SEC also maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including Telos.
12

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to other information in this Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluatingyour evaluation of the Company and its businesses because thesebusiness, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties as described below, together with the information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents we file with the SEC. These factors, as well as additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial, may currently have, or may have, a significant impact on our business, operating results or financial condition. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K as a result of the risk factors discussed below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Business and Operational Risks
Our business could be negatively affected by cyber or other information security breaches, threats or other disruptions.
We routinely experience cybersecurity threats, threats to our information technology infrastructure and attempts to gain access to our sensitive information, as do our customers, suppliers, subcontractors and joint venture partners. We may experience similar security threats at customer sites that we operate and manage as a contractual requirement. The threats we face vary from attacks common to most industries to more advanced and persistent, highly organized adversaries who target us because we protect national security information. While we have security measures in place to protect our data, the data of our customers or end-users of our services, our services and underlying infrastructure may in the future be materially breached or compromised as a result of the following:
Third-party attempts to fraudulently induce employees or customers into disclosing sensitive information such as user names, passwords or other information to gain access to our customers' data, our data or our IT systems;
Efforts by individuals or groups of hackers and sophisticated organizations, including state-sponsored organizations or nation-states;
Cyberattacks on our internally built infrastructure;
Vulnerabilities resulting from enhancements and updates to our existing solutions;
Vulnerabilities in the products or components across the broad ecosystem that our services operate in or are dependent on;
Vulnerabilities existing within newly acquired or integrated technologies and infrastructures;
Vulnerabilities existing within third-party software or services that we employ;
Attacks on, or vulnerabilities in, the many different underlying networks and services that power the Internet that our products depend on, most of which are not under our control or the control of our vendors, partners, or customers; and
Employee or contractor errors or intentional acts that compromise our security systems.
To the extent possible, these risks are mitigated by our ability to maintain and improve information security governance policies, enhanced processes and internal security controls, including our ability to escalate and respond to known and potential risks. Although we have developed systems and processes designed to assess, identify, and manage material cybersecurity risks, we can provide no assurances that such systems and processes will provide absolute security. In the normal course of business, we are the target of malicious cyberattack attempts. To date, any such attempts have not been material or significant to us, including to our reputation or business operations, or had a material financial impact, but there can be no assurance that future cyberattacks will not be material or significant.
A security breach or incident could result in unauthorized parties obtaining access to, or the denial of authorized access to, our IT systems or data, or our customers' systems or data, including intellectual property, proprietary, sensitive, or other confidential information. A security breach or incident could result in the unauthorized disclosure of large quantities of our customers' customers' personally identifiable information. A security breach could also result in a loss of confidence in the security of our services, damage our reputation, negatively impact our future sales, disrupt our business and lead to increases in insurance premiums and legal and financial exposure and liability. Finally, the detection, prevention and remediation of known or potential security vulnerabilities, including those arising from third-party hardware or software, may result in additional financial burdens due to additional direct and indirect costs, such as additional infrastructure capacity spending to mitigate any system degradation.
13

If our customers do not renew their subscriptions or contracts for our solutions and services and expand our relationship with them, our revenue could decline and our results of operations would be adversely impacted.
To continue to maintain and grow our business, it is important that our existing customers renew their subscriptions or contracts for our solutions and services when existing contract terms expire. Our customers have no obligation to renew or extend their subscriptions or contracts for our solutions or services after the expiration of the contractual periods, which vary in length, and in the normal course of business, some customers have elected not to renew or extend. It is difficult to predict attrition rates given the varying needs of our customer base. Our attrition rates may increase or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including customer dissatisfaction with our services, customers' spending levels, mix of customer base, decreases in the number of users at our customers, competition, pricing increases or changes, and deteriorating general economic conditions or budgetary constraints.
Our future success also depends in part on our ability to expand our relationships with our current customers by selling additional features and services, more subscriptions or enhanced editions of our services. This may also require increasingly sophisticated and costly sales efforts that are targeted at senior leaders. Similarly, the rate at which our customers purchase new or enhanced services depends on a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control.
If our efforts to maintain and expand our relationships with our existing customers are not successful, our business could be harmed.
U.S. government may terminate, cancel, delay, modify or curtail our contracts at any time prior to completion and, if we do not replace them, this may adversely affect our future revenues and could adversely impact our earnings.
Many of the U.S. Governmentgovernment programs in which we participate, both as a contractor or subcontractor, extend for several years and include one or more base years and one or more option years. These programs are typically funded on an annual basis. Under these contracts, the U.S. government generally has the right not to exercise options to extend or expand our contracts and may otherwise terminate, cancel, modify or curtail our contracts at its convenience.
First, the process may be delayed or disrupted. Changes in congressional schedules, negotiations for program funding levels or unforeseen world events can interrupt the funding for a program or contract. Second, funds for multi-year contracts can be changed in subsequent years in the appropriations process. In addition, the U.S. government has increasingly relied on IDIQ contracts and other procurement vehicles that are subject to a competitive bidding and funding process even after the award of the basic contract, adding an element of uncertainty to future funding levels. Delays in the funding process or changes in funding or funding priorities can impact the timing of available funds or can lead to changes in program content or termination at the government's convenience.
Any decisions by the U.S. government to not exercise contract options or to terminate, cancel, delay, modify or curtail our major programs or contracts would adversely affect our revenues, revenue growth and profitability.
We are dependent on a few key customer contracts for a significant portion of our salesfuture revenue, and a significant declinereduction in U.S. Government defensegoods and intelligence community spending,services or delay in implementation to one or more of these contracts would reduce or delay our future revenue and could materially affect our anticipated operating results.
A small number of our large customer contracts are expected to comprise a reallocation of spending to other priorities, could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our sales are highly concentrated with the U.S. Government. The customer relationship with the U.S. Government involves certain risks that are unique. The programs in which we participate must compete with other programs and policy imperatives during the budget and appropriations process.  In each of the past three years, a substantialsignificant portion of our net sales werefuture revenue. Our business will likely be harmed if any of our key customer contracts generate less revenue than we forecast, and the termination or delay of a large contract or multiple contracts could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability. Adverse events affecting the programs subject to the U.S. Government, particularly the DoD. U.S. defense spending has historically been cyclical. Defense budgets have received their strongest support when perceived threatsthese contracts could also negatively affect our ability to national security raise the level of concern over the country’s safety. As these threats subside, spending on the military tends to decrease. Rising budget deficits, increasing national debt, the cost of the global war on terrorism, increasing costs for entitlement programs, and potentially the large costs of combating the Coronavirus pandemic and addressing the health concerns and economic dislocation caused by COVID-19, continue to put pressure on all areas of discretionary spending,process transactions under those contracts, which could ultimately impactadversely affect our revenue and the defense budgetresults of operations.
A failure to attract, train, retain and motivate key and skilled employees, including key members of our management team, would adversely affect our ability to execute our strategy and may disrupt our operations.
Our business relies heavily upon the expertise and services of our employees. Our success depends upon the continued services of our highly qualified and experienced executive officers and other aspectskey members of federal discretionary spending.

U.S. Government appropriations have been and continuemanagement. From time to time, there may be affected by larger U.S. Government budgetary issues and related legislation. In 2011, Congress enactedchanges in our executive management team resulting from the Budget Control Acthiring or departure of 2011 (the “BCA”), which established specific limits on annual appropriations for fiscal years 2012-2021. These limits were subsequently amended several times. With the expiration of the BCA at the end of FY 2021, there are no statutory limitsexecutives. Such changes in place for FY 2022.

Accordingour executive management team may be disruptive to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), since enactment of the BCA, federal outlays devoted to defense programs fell from 4.5 percent as a share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to as low as 3.1 percent of GDP in each of fiscal years 2016-18, before rising slightly the past two years to a level of 3.4 percent in FY 2020. Moreover, CBO reports that, as a result of the spending caps imposed by the BCA, non-adjusted defense outlays subsequently shrank from $699.4 billion in FY 2011 to as low as $583.4 billion in FY 2016, and did not again exceed their FY 2011 level until FY 2020, when outlays were $713.8 billion, two percent above the FY 2011 level.

In FYs 2020 and 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic dislocation in the United States has resulted in an overwhelming federal response, including enactment of several massive and comprehensive emergency appropriations and economic stimulus measures. These were in addition to annual appropriations legislation for FY 2021, which was not enacted into law until late December 2020, nearly three months after the beginning of the fiscal year, during which time the government once again operated under a series of Continuing Resolutions which strictly limited new spending initiatives. These enormous emergency spending packages and their resulting increases in the budget deficit will necessarily factor into future spending decisions to an unknown degree. Further, as the outgoing Trump Administration did not complete its work on a proposed FY 2022 budget prior to leaving office on January 20, 2021, and the incoming Biden Administration has been delayed in submitting a proposed budget to Congress, the proposed spending levels for FY 2022 cannot be predicted.  Finally, the near- and long-term impacts of the COVID-19 health and associated economic crisis on federal budget planning and the government contracts that we hold, and on the federal procurements that we would otherwise compete for, cannot be known.

Should Congress and the White House be unable to make sufficient progress on the FY 2022 budget and enact appropriations legislation prior to the beginning of the new fiscal year on October 1, 2021, the Department of Defense and other federal departments and agencies will likely again be funded for an unknown period of time under a Continuing Resolution, which would restrict new spending initiatives.

our business.
We are also substantially dependent on the continued service of our existing highly trained and skilled personnel, particularly our business development and operations group, because of the complexity of our services and technologies. The technology industry is subject to the seasonalitysubstantial and continuous competition for engineers and other subject matter experts with high levels of theexperience in designing, developing and managing software, cybersecurity, and Internet-related services, as well as competition for sales executives, data scientists and operations personnel. Competition for skilled personnel is intense and many U.S. government spending.
We derive a substantial portionprograms also require contractors to have security clearances, certain of our revenues from U.S. government contracting,which can be difficult and as a result, we are subjecttime-consuming to the annual seasonality of the U.S. government purchasing. Because the U.S. government fiscal year ends on September 30, it is not uncommon for U.S. government agencies to award extra tasks in the weeks immediately prior to the end of its fiscal year in order to avoid the loss of unexpended fiscal year funds. As a result of this seasonality, we have historically experienced higher revenues in the third and fourth fiscal quarters, ending September 30 and December 31, respectively, with the pace of orders typically substantially reduced during the first and second fiscal quarters ending March 31 and June 30, respectively.

obtain.
Our pricing structures for our solutions and services may change from time to time.
We expect that we may change our pricing model fromnot be successful in attracting and retaining qualified personnel. From time to time, including as a resultwe have experienced, and we expect to continue to experience, difficulty in hiring, developing, integrating and retaining highly skilled employees with appropriate qualifications. These difficulties may be amplified by evolving restrictions on immigration, travel, or the availability of competition, global economic conditions,visas for skilled technology workers. These difficulties could be further amplified by the high cost of living in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area, where our headquarters is located. If we fail to attract new personnel or fail to retain and general reductions inmotivate our customers’ spending levels, pricing studies,current key employees or changes in howgroup, our solutions are broadly consumed. Similarly, as we introduce new productsbusiness and services, or as a resultfuture growth prospects could be severely harmed.
Due to the competitive bidding process to obtain U.S. government contracts, both upon initial issuance and re-competition, and the likelihood of the evolution of our existing solutions and services, we may have difficulty determining the appropriate price structure for our products and services. In addition, as new and existing competitors introduce new products or services that compete with ours, or revise their pricing structures,bid protest, we may be unable to achieve or sustain revenue growth and profitability.
Many of our U.S. government contracts are awarded through a competitive bidding process upon initial award and renewal, and we expect this will continue. There is often significant competition and pricing pressure as a result of this process. The competitive bidding process presents a number of risks, including the following:
We may expend substantial funds and time to prepare bids and proposals for contracts that may ultimately be awarded to one of our competitors;
We may be unable to accurately estimate the resources and costs that will be required to perform any contract we are awarded, which could result in substantial cost overruns and decreased margins;
We may encounter expense and delay if our competitors protest or challenge awards of contracts, and any such protest or challenge could result in a requirement to resubmit bids on modified specifications or in the termination, reduction or modification of the awarded contract;
The protest of contracts awarded to us may result in the delay of program performance and the generation of revenue while the protest is pending; and
If we are not given the opportunity to re-compete for U.S. government contracts previously awarded to us, we may incur expenses to protest such a decision and ultimately may not succeed in competing for or winning such contract renewal.
The U.S. government contracts for which we compete typically have multiple option periods, and if we fail to win a contract or a task order, we generally will be unable to compete again for that contract for several years. If we fail to win new contracts or to receive renewal contracts upon re-competition, it may result in additional costs and expenses and possible loss of revenue, and we will not have an opportunity to compete for these contract opportunities again until such contracts expire.
Our competitive position and future profitability depend, in part, on our ability to develop new technologies.
Our ability to increase revenue from existing customers and attract new customers will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and respond effectively to rapid technological changes and market developments. Virtually all of the products we produce and sell are highly engineered and require sophisticated manufacturing and system integration techniques and capabilities. The government market in which we primarily operate is characterized by rapidly changing technologies. The product or program needs of our government and commercial customers change and evolve regularly. Accordingly, our future performance in part depends on our ability to identify emerging technological trends, develop and manufacture competitive products, and bring those products to market quickly at cost-effective prices. If we fail to effectively anticipate, identify and respond to those changes in a timely manner, our business could be negatively impacted. Likewise, if we are unable to develop new products that meet customers' changing needs, future sales and earnings may be adversely affected.
Our financial results may fluctuate due to increasing variability in our security solutions' sales and implementation cycles.
We market the same price or based onmajority of our security solutions directly to U.S. government customers. The sale and implementation of our services to these entities typically involves a lengthy education process and a significant technical evaluation and commitment of capital and other resources, which adds uncertainty to our sales cycle. This process is also subject to the same pricing model as we have used historically. Moreover, as we continuerisk of delays associated with customers' internal budgeting and other procedures for approving large capital expenditures, deploying new technologies within their networks and testing and accepting new technologies that affect key operations.
As a result, the sales and implementation cycles associated with certain of our services can be difficult to target sellingpredict and lengthy. Our quarterly and annual operating results could be materially harmed if orders forecasted for a specific customer for a particular period of time are not realized.
15

Failure to effectively develop and execute our sales and business development capabilities will harm our ability to grow our business.
Our ability to increase our customer base and achieve broader market acceptance of our solutions and services will depend, to larger organizations, these larger organizationsa significant extent, on our ability to perform at a high level in our business development, growth, sales and marketing operations and activities. We believe that selling and marketing our security solutions requires advanced sales skills, customer relationships and technical knowledge to generate interest and effectively communicate our solutions or services to new markets.
We may demand substantial price concessions. In addition, we may need to change pricing policies to accommodate government pricing guidelines fornot achieve anticipated revenue growth from our contracts with federal, state, local, and foreign governments and government agencies. Ifgrowth team if we are unable to modify orhire and develop pricing modelstalented business development and strategies thatsales personnel, if our new business development and sales personnel are attractiveunable to existing and prospective customers, while enabling us to significantly grow our sales and revenue relative to our associated costs and expensesachieve desired productivity levels in a reasonable period of time, or if we are unable to retain our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be adversely impacted.

existing sales force.
We depend on computing infrastructure operated by Amazon Web Services (“AWS”), Microsoft, and other third parties to support some of our solutions and customers, and anyto help complete critical business functions. Any errors, disruption, performance problems, or failure in their or our operational infrastructure could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We rely on the technology, infrastructure, and software applications of certain third parties such as AWS and Microsoft Azure, in order to host or operate some of certain key platform features or functions of our business. Additionally, we rely on third-party computer hardware and cloud capabilities purchased in order to deliver our solutions and services. WeOur business is dependent on the integrity, security and efficient operation of this technology and infrastructure, and we do not havenecessarily control over the operationsoperation or data security of the facilities of the third parties thatthird-parties we use. utilize.
If any of these third-party services experience errors, disruptions, security issues, or other performance deficiencies,deficiencies; if they are updated such that our solutions become incompatible,incompatible; if these services, software, or hardware failfails or becomebecomes unavailable due to extended outages, interruptions, defects, or otherwise,otherwise; or if they are no longer available on commercially reasonable terms or prices (or at all), these issues could result in errors or defects in our solutions, causefailure of our solutions to fail,perform, decline in our revenue and margins, could decline, ordamage to our reputation and brand, to be damaged, we could be exposedexposure to legal or contractual liability, increase in our expenses, could increase,and interruption in our ability to manage our operations could be interrupted, andoperations. In addition, our processes for managing our sales and servicing our customers could be impaired until equivalent services or technology, if available, are identified, procured, and implemented, all of which may take significant time and resources, increase our costs, and could adversely affect our business. Many of these third-party providers attempt to impose limitations on their liability for such errors, disruptions, defects, performance deficiencies, or failures, and if enforceable, we may have additional liability to our customers or third-party providers.

Furthermore, our solutions are, in many cases, important or essential to our customers' operations, including in some cases, their cybersecurity or oversight and compliance programs, and subject to service level agreements. Any interruption in our service, whether as a result of an internal or third-party issue, could damage our brand and reputation, cause our customers to terminate or not renew their contracts with us or decrease the use of our solutions and services, require us to indemnify our customers against certain losses, result in our issuing credit or paying penalties or fines, subject us to other losses or liabilities, cause our solutions to be perceived as unreliable or unsecure, and prevent us from gaining new or additional business from current or future customers, any of which could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We have experienced, and may inMoreover, to the future experience, disruptions, failures, data loss, outages, and other performance problems with our infrastructure and cloud-based offerings due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, introductions of new functionality, human or software errors, employee misconduct,extent that we do not effectively address capacity constraints, denial of service attacks, phishing attacks, computer viruses, malicious or destructive code, or other security-related incidents,upgrade our systems as needed, and continually develop our disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all situations. If we experience disruptions, failures, data loss, outages, or other performance problems,technology and network architecture to accommodate actual and anticipated changes in technology, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected. The provisioning of additional cloud hosting capacity requires lead time. These third parties have no obligation to renew their agreements with us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If these third parties increase pricing terms, terminate or seek to terminate our contractual relationship, establish more favorable relationships with our competitors, or change or interpret their terms of service or policies in a manner that is unfavorable with respect to us, we may be required to transfer to other cloud providers or invest in a private cloud. In that case, we could incur significant costs and experience possible service interruption in connection with doing so, or risk loss of customer contracts if they are unwilling to accept such a change.

A failure to maintain our relationships with our third-party providers (or obtain adequate replacements), and to receive services from such providers that do not contain any material errors or defects, could adversely affect our ability to deliver effective products and solutions to our customers and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
16

We depend on third parties for certain operational services and components of our products in order to fully perform under our contracts, and the failure or disruption of a third party to perform these services could have an adverse impact on our business.
We rely on subcontractors and other suppliers to provide materials, major components and subsystems for our products or to perform a portion of the services that we provide to our customers. Occasionally, we rely on only one or two sources of supply, which, if disrupted, could have an adverse effect on our ability to meet our commitments to customers. We depend on these subcontractors and suppliers to fulfill their contractual obligations in a timely and satisfactory manner in full compliance with customer requirements. If one or more of our suppliers or subcontractors is unable to satisfactorily provide on a timely basis the agreed-upon supplies or perform the agreed-upon services per its contractual obligations, our ability to perform our obligations as a prime contractor may be adversely affected, and we may be exposed to liability.
Our systems and the third-party systems upon which we and our customers rely are also vulnerable to damage or interruption from catastrophic occurrences such as earthquakes, floods, fires, power loss,or events outside of our control.
Our systems and the third-party systems, upon which we and our customers rely, are also vulnerable to damage or interruption from catastrophic occurrences, telecommunication failures, cybersecurity threats, terrorist attacks, natural disasters, public health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic,social unrest, geopolitical and similar events, or acts of misconduct. Despite any precautions we may take, the occurrence of a catastrophic disaster or other unanticipated problems at our or our third-party vendors’vendors' hosting facilities, or within our systems or the systems of third parties upon which we rely, could result in interruptions, performance problems, or failure of our infrastructure, technology, or solutions, which may adversely impact our business. In addition, our ability to conduct normal business operations could be severely affected. In the event of significant physical damage to one of these facilities, it may take a significant period of time to achieve full resumption of our services, and our disaster recovery planning may not account for all eventualities. In addition, any negative publicity arising from these disruptions could harm our reputation and brand and adversely affect our business.

Furthermore,We may be also be impacted by natural disasters, wars, terrorist attacks, power outages, public health crisis (epidemics or pandemics), or other events outside of our solutions are in many cases importantcontrol. If major disasters such as earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, fires, or essentialother events occur, or our information system or communications network breaks down, operates improperly, or is unusable, our headquarters and other facilities may be seriously damaged, or we may have to our customers’ operations, including in some cases, their cybersecuritystop or oversightdelay production and compliance programs, and subject to service level agreements (“SLAs”). Any interruption in our service, whether as a result of an internal or third-party issue, could damage our brand and reputation, cause our customers to terminate or not renew their contracts with us or decrease usedelivery of our solutions and services, requireservices.
In addition, the recent COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the normal operations of many businesses and other organizations, including the temporary closure or scale-back of business operations and the imposition of either quarantine or remote work or meeting requirements for employees, either by government order or on a voluntary basis. The pandemic may adversely affect our customers' ability to perform their missions and is, in many cases disrupting their operations. It may also result in a change in spending priorities on the part of our customers, which could precipitate the cancellation, delay or deferral of programs, contracts or business opportunities. It may also impact the ability of our subcontractors, partners, and suppliers to operate and fulfill their contractual obligations, and result in an increase in their costs and cause delays in performance. These supply chain effects, and the direct effect of the virus and the disruption on our operations, may negatively impact both our ability to meet customer demand and our revenue and profit margins. Our employees, in some cases, are working remotely due either to safety concerns or to customer-imposed limitations and using various technologies to perform their functions.
Although we maintain crisis management and disaster response plans, such events could make it difficult or impossible for us to indemnifydeliver our solutions and services to our customers, against certain losses, resultand could decrease demand for our offerings. We may incur shutdowns, delays, disruptions or expenses relating to such events outside of our control, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. Moreover, any significant natural disaster, pandemic, other catastrophic or force majeure events could affect our personnel, supply chain, or service providers' ability to provide materials and perform services on a timely basis. Act of terrorism and other geopolitical unrest could also potentially cause disruptions in our issuing creditbusiness or paying penaltiesthe business of our supply chain, services providers, or fines, subject usthe economy as a whole. Because we do not carry insurance for all of these possible losses, and significant recovery time could be required to other losses or liabilities, causeresume operations, our solutionsfinancial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected by such an event outside of our control.
Failure to be perceived as unreliable or unsecure,adequately protect our intellectual property, technologies and prevent us from gaining new or additional business from current or future customers, any of whichproprietary rights could harm our business, competitive position, financial condition, and results of operations.

Moreover,Our success depends, in part, on our internally developed technologies, patents and other intellectual property. Despite our precautions, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use our trade secrets or other forms of intellectual property without authorization. Furthermore, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our proprietary rights in those countries to the same extent U.S. law protects these rights in the United States. In addition, it is possible that others may independently develop substantially equivalent intellectual property. If we do not effectively address capacity constraints, upgradeprotect our systems as needed, and continually develop our technology and network architecture to accommodate actual and anticipated changes in technology,intellectual property, our business financial condition, and resultscould suffer.
17

To protect our contractual relationship, establish more favorable relationships with our competitors, or change or interpret their terms of service or policies in a manner that is unfavorable with respect to us,intellectual property rights, we may be required to transferspend significant resources to monitor and protect our rights. In the future, we may have to resort to litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets, or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Regardless of outcome, this type of litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and technical resources. The inability to adequately protect and enforce our intellectual property and other cloud providersproprietary rights could seriously harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Failure to accurately estimate the factors upon which we base our contract pricing could adversely impact our earnings and profitability.
Generally, our customer contracts are either fixed-price or investcost-reimbursable. Under fixed-price contracts, which represented approximately 78.5% of our 2023 revenues, we receive a fixed price irrespective of the actual costs we incur and, consequently, we carry the burden of any cost overruns. Due to their nature, fixed-price contracts inherently have more risk than cost-reimbursable contracts, particularly fixed-price development contracts where the costs to complete the development stage of the program can be highly variable, uncertain and difficult to estimate. Under cost-reimbursable contracts, subject to a contract-ceiling amount in a private cloud. Ifcertain cases, we are required to transfer to other cloud providers or invest in a private cloud, we could incur significantreimbursed for allowable costs and experience possible service interruption in connection with doing so,paid a fee, which may be fixed or risk loss ofperformance-based. If our costs exceed the contract ceiling and are not authorized by the customer contracts if theyor are unwillingnot allowable under the contract or applicable regulations, we may not be able to acceptobtain reimbursement for all such a change.

A failure to maintaincosts and our relationships with our third-party providers (or obtain adequate replacements), and to receive services from such providers that do not contain any material errorsfees may be reduced or defects, could adversely affect our ability to deliver effective products and solutions to our customers and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We are dependent on a few key customer contracts for a significant portioneliminated. Because many of our future revenue,contracts involve advanced designs and a significant reduction in services to one or more of these contracts would reduce our future revenue and harm our anticipated operating results.
A small number of our large customer contracts, including the TSA PreCheck™ enrollment program and our program with CMS, are expected to comprise a significant portion of our future revenue. Our business will likely be harmed if any of our key customer contracts do not generate as much revenue as we forecast, and the termination or delay of a large contract or of multiple contracts could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability. Adverse events affecting the programs subject to these contracts could also negatively affect our ability to process transactions under those contracts, which could adversely affect our revenue and results of operations. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic may adversely affect or disrupt the TSA PreCheck™ enrollment program, which could lead to delays in the implementation of that program and changes in demand for that program. In addition, if the COVID-19 pandemic and associated protective or preventative measures expand,innovative technologies, we may experience unforeseen technological difficulties and cost overruns.
Under both types of contracts, we must accurately estimate the likely volume of work that will occur, costs and resource requirements involved, and assess the probability of completing individual transactions or milestones within the contracted time period and amount to maximize or earn profit on these contracts. In addition, some of our contracts have provisions relating to cost controls and audit rights, and if we fail to meet the terms specified in those contracts, we may not realize their full benefits. Cost overruns or poor cost controls could lower earnings, or may incur a material adverse effectnet loss on a contract, and cause a negative impact on our business operations, revenues, financial condition, and ability to execute on business or contract opportunities; however, the ultimate impact is highly uncertain and subject to change.

results of operations.
We will face risks associated with the growth of our business in new commercial markets and with new customer verticals, and we may neithernot be able to continue our organic growth nor have the necessary resources to dedicate to the overall growth of our business.
WeTo increase our revenue, and achieve and maintain profitability, we plan to expand our operations in new commercial markets, including those where we may have limited operating experience, and may be subject to increased business, technology and economic risks that could affect our financial results. In recent periods, we have increased our focus on commercial customers. In the future, we may increasingly focus on suchcommercial customers, including in the banking, financial services, healthcare, pharmaceutical, manufacturing, telecommunication, airlines and aerospace, insurance, retail, transportation, shipping and logistics, and energy industries, as well as other critical infrastructure industries. Entering new verticals and expanding in the verticals in which we are already operating will continue to require significant resources and there is no guarantee that such efforts will be successful or beneficial to us. Historically,
Although sales to a new customer have often led to additional sales to the same customer or similarly situated customers.customers, it is uncertain we will achieve the same penetration and organic growth in the future, and our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations could be negatively impacted. As we expand into and within new and emerging markets and heavily regulated industry verticals, we will likely face additional regulatory scrutiny, risks, and burdens from the governments and agencies which regulate those markets and industries. While this approach
Failure to expansion within new commercial marketsdeliver high-quality technical support services may adversely affect our relationships with our customers and verticals has proven successfulour financial results.
Our customers depend on our support organization to resolve technical issues relating to our solutions and offerings. We may be unable to respond quickly enough to accommodate short-term increases in customer demand for support services. Increased customer demand for these services, without corresponding revenues, could increase costs and adversely affect our operating results. In addition, our sales process is highly dependent on the reputation of our solutions and support and on positive recommendations from our existing customers. Failure to maintain high-quality technical support, or a market perception that we do not maintain high-quality support, could adversely affect our reputation, our ability to sell our offerings to existing and prospective customers, and our business, operating results and financial position.
Our growth depends, in part, on the success of our strategic relationship with our partner organizations.
To grow our business, we will continue to build, grow and maintain relationships with third parties, such as partner organizations, that provide complementary cybersecurity offerings. Identifying partners, and negotiating relationships with them, requires significant time and resources. The relationship we have with our partners, and that our partners have with our customers, provides our customers with enhanced value for our solutions and services.
18

Our agreements with our partners are generally non-exclusive; therefore, our partners may offer customer solutions from several companies, including solutions and services that compete with ours. If our partners do not effectively market and sell our solutions or services, or use greater efforts to market and sell their solutions or those of our competitors, or fail to meet the needs of our customers, or if we are unsuccessful in establishing or maintaining our relationships with our partners, our ability to compete in the past, itmarketplace or to grow our revenue could be impaired, and our results of operations could be adversely affected.
If we are unable to license third-party technology that is uncertainused in our products and services to perform key functions, the loss could have an adverse effect on our revenues.
We currently incorporate technology that we will achievelicense from third-parties, including software, into our solutions. The third-party technology licenses used by us may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Our business could suffer if we lost the right to use these technologies. Additionally, if we are unable to license technology from third parties, we may be forced to acquire or develop alternative technology, which we may be unable to do in a commercially feasible manner or at all, and may require us to use alternative technology of lower quality or performance standards. As a result, our margins and results of operations could be significantly harmed.
A third-party could claim that the licensed software infringes a patent or other proprietary right. Litigation between the licensor and a third-party or between a third party and us could lead to royalty obligations for which we are not indemnified or for which indemnification is insufficient, or we may not be able to obtain any additional license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. The loss of, or our inability to obtain or maintain, any of these technology licenses could delay the introduction of new products or services until equivalent technology, if available, is identified, licensed and integrated.
The inability to set optimal pricing structures for our solutions and services could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
From time to time, we change our pricing model in response to competition, global economic conditions, and general reductions in our customers' spending levels, pricing studies, or changes in how our solutions are broadly consumed. Similarly, as we introduce new products and services, or as a result of the evolution of our existing solutions and services, we may have difficulty determining the appropriate price structure for our products and services. Further, as new and existing competitors introduce new products or services that compete with ours, or revise their pricing structures, we may be unable to attract new customers at the same penetrationprice or based on the same pricing model as we have used historically. Moreover, as we continue to target selling our solutions and organic growthservices to larger organizations, these larger organizations may demand substantial price concessions. We may also need to change pricing policies to accommodate government pricing guidelines for our contracts with federal, state, local, and foreign governments and government agencies.
If we are unable to modify or develop pricing models and strategies that are attractive to existing and prospective customers, while enabling us to significantly grow our sales and revenue relative to our associated costs and expenses in the future anda reasonable period of time, our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations couldmay be negativelyadversely impacted.

InSales to customers outside the future, we may seek to enter into other credit facilities to help fund our working capital needs. These credit facilities mayUnited States expose us to additional risks inherent in international operations.
We sell our services outside the United States and are subject to unique risks and challenges associated with leverageinternational business. These risks and challenges include, but are not limited to, (a) compliance with governmental laws and regulations, (b) foreign business practices, (c) tax environments, (d) protection of our intellectual property, and (e) regional economic and geopolitical conditions.
Although our international operations have historically generated a small proportion of our revenues, any of these factors could negatively impact our business and results of operations. In addition, these factors may inhibitalso negatively impact our ability to successfully expand into emerging market countries, where we have little or no operating flexibility.experience, where it can be costly and challenging to establish and maintain operations, including hiring and managing required personnel, and difficult to promote our brand, and where we may not benefit from any first-to-market advantage or otherwise succeed.
We may be subject to legal proceedings, regulatory disputes and governmental inquiries that could materially harm our business, operating results, and financial condition.
From time to time, in the ordinary course of business, we have been involved in legal proceedings and in the future may be subject to lawsuits, claims, government investigations and other proceedings. These may include lawsuits and claims related to securities compliance, contracts, subcontracts, intellectual property, employment and wage claims, and other matters. Our business may be adversely affected by the outcome of legal proceedings and other contingencies that cannot be predicted with certainty. Those contingencies include, but are not limited to, the cost of litigation and unpredictable court decisions. Adverse outcomes with respect to litigation, or a government inquiry, or any of these legal proceedings may result in significant settlement costs or judgments, penalties and fines, or harm our reputation, all of which could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial conditions.
19

Potential future acquisitions, strategic investments, partnerships, divestitures, mergers or joint ventures may subject us to significant risks, any of which could harm our business.
We have in the past acquired, and may in the future seek to enter into other credit facilitiesacquire or invest in complementary businesses, products or technologies to enhance our technical capabilities or otherwise offer growth opportunities.
Our long-term strategy may include identifying and acquiring, partnering with, third-party lenders to help fund our business. Such credit facilities will likely require us to pay a commitment feeinvesting in or merging with suitable candidates on the undrawn amountacceptable terms, or divesting of certain business lines or activities. Partnerships, mergers, joint ventures, acquisitions, and will likely containdivestitures include a number of affirmativerisks and restrictive covenants.present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including but not limited to:

Diversion of management attention from running our existing business;
Possible material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting;
Increased expenses, including legal, administrative and compensation expenses related to newly hired or terminated employees;
Increased costs to integrate the technology, personnel, customer base and business practices of the acquired company with us;
Potential exposure to material liabilities not discovered in the due diligence process;
Potential adverse effects on reported operating results due to possible write-down of goodwill and other intangible assets associated with acquisitions; and
Unavailability of acquisition financing or unavailability of such financing on reasonable terms.
Any acquired business, technology, service or product could significantly underperform relative to our expectations and may not achieve the benefits we expect from possible acquisitions. For all these reasons, our pursuit of an acquisition, partnership, investment, divestiture, merger, or joint venture could cause its actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.
Public confidence in, and acceptance of, identity platforms and biometrics generally, and our solutions specifically, will be a key factor in our business’s continued growth.
Our future profitability will depend, in part, on public confidence in and acceptance of identity platforms and biometrics generally. Continued acceptance of identity platforms and biometric information as a secure and reliable method to identify individuals, mitigate risk and minimize fraud is an important factor in our continued growth. While both identity platforms and biometrics have become more widely adopted, they may not achieve universal acceptance. The attractiveness of our solutions to our customers is impacted by a number of factors, including the willingness of individuals to provide their personal information, including biometric information, to private or governmental entities, the level of confidence that such information can be stored safely and securely, and trust that such information will not be misused or breached. Certain individuals may never accept the use of biometrics as being safe. If identity platforms and biometrics do not achieve universal acceptance, or our solutions are not competitive with our industry players, our growth could be limited, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
On the other hand, any negative associations or perceptions with our solutions or biometrics could impede our business growth and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Likewise, any breaches on our information technology systems, particularly on the use and collection of biometric information, may subject us to significant reputational, financial, legal or operational consequences.
Actions that we violate any such covenants,are taking to restructure our lenders could acceleratebusiness to improve profitability may not be as effective as anticipated.
During the maturityfourth quarter of any debt outstandingfiscal year 2022, we committed to a restructuring plan to streamline our workforce and spending to better align our cost structure with the volume of our business. We began the execution of the restructuring plan early 2023, incurring restructuring-related costs, including employee severance and related benefit costs and external consulting and advisory fees related to the implementation of the restructuring plan. We may be unable to realize the expected improved profitability and efficiency from our restructuring efforts.
20

Industry, Legal and Regulatory Risks
The business environment in which we operate is highly competitive, and we may not be prohibited from making any distributionsable to our stockholders. Such debt may be secured by our assets, including the stockcompete successfully against existing or future competitors.
We operate in an intensely competitive market and diverse industry segment, and we may own in subsidiaries and the rights we have under intercompany loan agreements that we may enter intoexpect competition to increase in the future from established businesses and new market entrants. Based on our current market analysis, there is no single company or small group of companies in a dominant competitive position. Some large competitors offer capabilities in a number of markets that overlap many of the same areas in which we offer services, while certain companies are focused upon only one or a few of such markets. Some of the firms that compete with us in multiple areas include large, established defense contractors. In addition, we compete with smaller specialty companies, including risk and compliance management companies, organizational messaging companies, and security consulting organizations, and companies that provide secure network offerings. If we are unable to anticipate or react to these challenges or do not compete effectively, our businesses. competitive position could weaken and could result in a decline in revenue or reduced revenue growth, price reductions or reduced gross margins, and loss of market share, all of which could adversely affect our business.
A decline in the federal budget, changes in spending or budgetary priorities of the U.S. government, a prolonged U.S. government shutdown or delays in contract awards may significantly and adversely affect our future revenues, cash flow and financial results.
Our abilitycustomers are substantially U.S. government agencies. The customer relationship with the U.S. government involves certain unique risks. The programs we participate in must compete with other programs and policy imperatives during the budget and appropriations process.
If government funding relating to meet our debt service obligationscontracts with the U.S. government becomes unavailable, or is reduced or delayed, or planned orders are reduced, our contracts or subcontracts may be terminated or adjusted by the U.S. government or the prime contractor. Our operating results could also be adversely affected by eventsspending caps or changes in the budgetary priorities of the U.S. government, as well as delays in program starts or the award of contracts or task orders under contracts.
In recent years, U.S. government appropriations have been affected by larger U.S. government budgetary issues and related legislation. As a result, DoD funding levels have fluctuated and have been difficult to predict. Future spending levels are subject to a wide range of factors, including Congressional action. In addition, over the last few years, the U.S. government has been unable to complete its budget process before the end of its fiscal year, resulting in both a government shutdown and continuing resolutions to extend sufficient funds only for U.S. government agencies to continue operating. Not long ago, the federal government was shut down due to a lack of funding for over one month between late 2018 and early 2019, and currently a series of continuing resolutions have funded the government at fiscal year 2023 levels, with no new starts. Moreover, the national debt threatened to reach the statutory debt ceiling in 2023, and such an event in future years could result in the U.S. government defaulting on its debts.
As a result, government spending levels are difficult to predict beyond our controlthe near term due to numerous factors, including the external threat environment, future government priorities and will depend primarily upon cash produced by our business. Any failure to comply with the termsstate of our indebtedness maygovernment finances. Significant changes in government spending or changes in U.S. government priorities, policies and requirements could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition.condition or liquidity.

We are subject to the seasonality of U.S. government spending.
In addition, we expect that such credit facilities will bear interest at floating rates which will generally changeWe derive a substantial portion of our revenues from U.S. government contracting, and as interest rates change. We will bear the risk that the rates thata result, we are charged by our lenders will increase faster thansubject to the annual seasonality of U.S. government purchasing. Because the U.S. government fiscal year ends on September 30, it is common for U.S. government agencies to award extra tasks in the weeks immediately prior to the end of its fiscal year in order to avoid the loss of unexpended fiscal year funds. As a result of this seasonality, we can grow the cash flow from our businesses, which could reduce profitability, materially adversely affect our ability to service our debt and cause us to breach covenants containedhave historically experienced higher revenues in our third-party credit facilities.third and fourth fiscal quarters, ending September 30 and December 31, respectively, with the pace of orders typically substantially reduced during our first and second fiscal quarters ending March 31 and June 30, respectively.

Our business is subjectWe are required to comply with stringent, complex and evolving U.S.laws, rules, regulations and non-U.S. laws and regulations regardingstandards, as well as contractual obligations relating to privacy, data protection and security, technology protection, and other matters. Many ofAny actual or perceived failure to comply with these laws and regulations are subject to change and uncertain interpretation, andrequirements could result in claims, changes to our business practices, monetary penalties, increased cost of operations, or otherwise harmhave a material effect on our business.
We are subject to a variety of local, state, national, and international laws and directives and regulations in the United States and abroad that involve matters central to our business, including privacy and data protection, data security, data storage, retention, transfer and deletion, technology protection, and personal information. Foreign data protection, data security, privacy, and other laws and regulations can impose different obligations or be more restrictive than those in the United States. These U.S. federal and state and foreign laws and regulations, which, depending on the regime, may be enforced by private parties or government entities, are constantly evolving and can be subject to significant change, and they are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. In addition, the application, interpretation, and enforcement of these laws and regulations are often uncertain, and may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from country to country and inconsistently with our current policies and practices. A number of proposals are pending before U.S. federal, state, and foreign legislative and regulatory bodies that could significantly affect our business.

21

The overarching complexity of privacy and data protection laws and regulations around the world pose a compliance challenge that could manifest in costs, damages, or liability in other forms as a result of failure to implement proper programmatic controls, failure to adhere to those controls, or the malicious or inadvertent breach of applicable privacy and data protection requirements by us, our employees, our business partners, or our customers.

In addition to government regulation, self-regulatory standards and other industry standards may legally or contractually apply to us, be argued to apply to us, or we may elect to comply with such standards or to facilitate our customers’customers' compliance with such standards. Because privacy, data protection, and information security are critical competitive factors in our industry, we may make statements on our website, in marketing materials, or in other settings about our data security measures and our compliance with, or our ability to facilitate our customers’customers' compliance with, these standards.
We also expect that there will continue to be new proposed laws and regulations concerning privacy, data protection, and information security, and we cannot yet determine the impact such future laws, regulations and standards, or amendments to or re-interpretations of existing laws and regulations, industry standards, or other obligations may have on our business. New laws, amendments to or re-interpretations of existing laws and regulations, industry standards, and contractual and other obligations may require us to incur additional costs and restrict our business operations. As these legal regimes relating to privacy, data protection, and information security continue to evolve, they may result in ever-increasing public scrutiny and escalating levels of enforcement and sanctions. Furthermore, because the interpretation and application of laws, standards, contractual obligations and other obligations relating to privacy, data protection, and information security are uncertain, these laws, standards, and contractual and other obligations may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is, or is alleged to be, inconsistent with our data management practices, our policies or procedures, or the features of our solutions. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines, lawsuits, and other claims, we could be required to fundamentally change our business activities and practices or modify our solutions, which could have an adverse effect on our business. We may be unable to make such changes and modifications in a commercially reasonable manner or at all, and our ability to fulfill existing obligations, make enhancements, or develop new solutions and features could be limited. Furthermore, the costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, the laws, regulations, and policies that are applicable to the businesses of our customers may limit the use and adoption of, and reduce the overall demand for, our solutions.

These existing and proposed laws and regulations can be costly to comply with and can make our solutions and services less effective or valuable, delay or impede the development of new products, result in negative publicity, increase our operating costs, require us to modify our data handling practices, limit our operations, impose substantial fines and penalties, require significant management time and attention, or put our data or technology at risk. Any failure or perceived failure by us or our solutions to comply with U.S., or applicable foreign laws, regulations, directives, policies, industry standards, or legal obligations relating to privacy, data protection, or information security, or any security incident that results in loss of or the unauthorized access to, or acquisition, use, release, or transfer of, personal information, personal data, or other customer or sensitive data sensitive data or information may result in governmental investigations, inquiries, enforcement actions and prosecutions, private claims and litigation, indemnification or other contractual obligations, other remedies, including fines or demands that we modify or cease existing business practices, or adverse publicity, and related costs and liabilities, which could significantly and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We are subject to substantial oversight from federal agencies that have the authority to suspend our ability to bid on contracts.
Changes in accounting principles or their applicationAs a U.S. government contractor, we are subject to usoversight by many agencies and entities of the U.S. government that may investigate and make inquiries about our business practices and conduct audits of contract performance and cost accounting. Depending on the results of any such audits and investigations, the U.S. government may make claims against us. Under U.S. government procurement regulations and practices, an indictment of a U.S. government contractor could result in unfavorable accounting charges that contractor being fined and/or effects, whichsuspended for a period of time from eligibility for bidding on, or for the award of, new U.S. government contracts. A conviction could adversely affect our resultsresult in debarment for a specified period of operations and growth prospects.
We prepare consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In particular, we make certain estimates and assumptions relatedtime. To the best of management's knowledge, there are no pending government investigations, inquiries, claims or audits against the Company likely to the adoption and interpretation of these principles including the recognition of our revenue and the accounting of our stock-based compensation expense with respect to our consolidated financial statements. If these assumptions turn out to be incorrect, our revenue or our stock-based compensation expense could materially differ from our expectations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
We are subject to governmental export and import controls that could impair our ability to compete in international markets and subject us to liability if we are not in full compliance with applicable laws.
Some of our solutions are subject to export and import controls, including, without limitation, the Department of State's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, the Commerce Department's Export Administration Regulations, U.S. Customs regulations and various economic and trade sanctions regulations established by the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control. If we fail to comply with these U.S. export control laws and import laws, we and certain of our employees could be subject to substantial civil or criminal penalties, including the possible loss of export or import privileges; fines, which may be imposed on us and responsible employees or managers; and, in extreme cases, the incarceration of responsible employees or managers. Obtaining the necessary authorizations, including any required license, may be time-consuming, is not guaranteed and may result in the delay or loss of sales opportunities.
22

Furthermore, the U.S. export control laws and economic sanctions laws prohibit the shipment of certain products and services to U.S. embargoed or sanctioned countries, governments and persons. Even though we take precautions to prevent our solutions from being provisioned or provided to U.S. sanctions targets in violation of applicable regulations, our solutions could be provisioned to those targets despite such precautions. Any such sales could have negative consequences, including government investigations, penalties and reputational harm. Changes in our solutions or changes in export and import regulations may create delays in the introduction, sale and deployment of our solutions in international markets or prevent the export or import of our solutions to certain countries, governments or persons altogether. Any decreased use of our solutions or limitation on our ability to export or sell our solutions may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Financial Reporting and Common Stock
We may fail to meet our publicly announced guidance and other expectations about our business and operating results, which may cause our stock price to decline.
From time to time, we may release guidance in our quarterly earnings conference calls, quarterly earnings releases, or otherwise, regarding our future performance that represents our management's estimates as of the date of release. This guidance, which includes forward-looking statements, is based on projections prepared by our management. Projections are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, while presented with numerical specificity, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and are based upon specific assumptions with respect to future business decisions, some of which will change. Our aim is to state possible outcomes as high and low ranges to provide a sensitivity analysis as variables are changed but are not intended to imply that actual results could not fall outside of the suggested ranges. The principal reason that we release guidance is to provide a basis for our management to discuss our business outlook with analysts and investors. We do not accept any responsibility for any projections or reports published by any such third parties.
Guidance is necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions underlying the guidance furnished by us will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. A change inAccordingly, our guidance is only an estimate of what management believes is realizable as of the date of release. Any failure to successfully implement our operating strategy or the occurrence of any of these principlesthe events or circumstances beyond our control could result in the actual operating results being different from our guidance, and the differences may be adverse and material. In light of the foregoing, investors are urged not to rely upon our guidance in making an investment decision regarding our common stock.
Furthermore, if we make downward revisions to our previously announced guidance, or if our publicly announced guidance of future operating results fails to meet the expectations of securities analysts, investors or other interested parties, the price of our common stock may decline.
Our quarterly operating results fluctuate and may fall short of prior periods, our projections or the expectations of securities analysts or investors, which could adversely affect the trading price of our stock.
Our operating results have fluctuated from quarter to quarter at points in their interpretationsthe past, and they may do so in the future. Therefore, the results of any one quarter may not be a reliable indication of results to be expected for any other quarter or applicationfor any year. If we fail to us,increase our results over prior periods, to achieve our projected results or to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors, our stock price may havedecline, and the decrease in the stock price may be disproportionate to the shortfall in our financial performance. Results may be affected by various factors, including those described in these risk factors.
We cannot guarantee that our share repurchase program will be fully implemented or that it will enhance long-term stockholder value.
In May 2022, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program ("SRP") for the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of our outstanding shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2023, approximately $38.7 million remained available under the stock repurchase program. The repurchase program has no termination date and may be suspended for periods, amended or discontinued at any time. We are not obligated to repurchase a specified number or dollar value of shares. Share repurchases under the program will be made from time to time in private transactions or open market purchases, as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements. There can be no guarantee about the timing of our share repurchases, or that the volume of such repurchases will increase. The stock repurchase program could affect the price of our common stock, increase volatility, diminish our cash reserves, and even if fully implemented may not enhance long-term stockholder value.
23

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), the rules and regulations of Nasdaq, and other securities rules and regulations that impose various requirements on public companies. Our management and other personnel devote substantial time and resources to comply with these rules and regulations. Such compliance has increased, and will continue to increase, our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, makes some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly, and places significant effectstrain on our reported results, as well as our processespersonnel, systems and relatedresources. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and may retroactively affect previously reported resultsprocedures and internal control over financial reporting, and to report any material weaknesses in such internal control.
In fiscal year ended 2022, management identified a material weakness related to ineffective design and maintenance of controls over the assessment of the accounting for forfeitures of non-standard equity awards. While the identified material weakness has been remediated in fiscal year 2023, we cannot provide assurance that we will not identify additional material weaknesses in future periods or that we will be successful in remediating any future significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.
We are continuing to develop and refine our forecasts, which may negatively impact ourdisclosure controls, internal control over financial statements. For example, recent new standards issuedreporting and other procedures that are designed to ensure information required to be disclosed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board could materially impactus in our consolidated financial statements. The adoption and in the reports that we file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and information required to be disclosed in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive and financial officers. Our current controls and any new controls we develop may become inadequate because of these new standards may potentially require enhancements or changes in conditions in our processesbusiness. Additionally, to the extent we acquire other businesses, the acquired company may not have a sufficiently robust system of internal controls and we may uncover new deficiencies. Weaknesses in our internal controls may be discovered in the future. Any failure to develop or systems and may require significant time and cost on behalf of our financial management. This maymaintain effective controls, or any difficulties encountered in turn adversely affecttheir implementation or improvement, could harm our results of operations, may result in a restatement of our consolidated financial statements for prior periods, could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, and growth prospects.could result in an adverse opinion regarding our internal control over financial reporting from our independent registered public accounting firm, and lead to investigations or sanctions by regulatory authorities. Any failure to maintain effective disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting could have a material and adverse effect on our business and results of operations and could cause a decline in the price of our stock.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires our management to certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We are also required to have our independent registered public accounting firm attest to, and issue an opinion on, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if, when required, our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would cause the price of our common stock to decline.
General Risk Factors
If our judgments or estimates relating to our critical accounting policies are based on assumptions that change or prove to be incorrect, our results of operations could fall below expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in our stock price.be adversely affected.
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities, and equity, and the amount of revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our results of operations may be adversely affected if our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our results of operations to fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in the trading price of our common stock. Significant judgments, estimates, and assumptions used in preparing our consolidated financial statements include, or may in the future include, those related to revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, common stock valuations,goodwill and other long-lived assets, and income taxes.

24
18

A novel strain of coronavirus, COVID-19, as well as variants of this strain, may adversely affect our future business operations, financial condition and our ability to execute on business or contract opportunities.
In December 2019, an outbreak of COVID-19 was reported in Wuhan, China. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic and on March 13, 2020, President Donald J. Trump declared the virus a national emergency. This highly contagious disease has spread to most of the countries in the world and throughout the United States, creating a serious impact on customers, workforces, and suppliers, disrupting economies and financial markets, and potentially leading to a world-wide economic downturn. COVID-19, as well as subsequently reported variants of this strain, have caused a disruption of the normal operations of many businesses, including the temporary closure or scale-back of business operations and/or the imposition of either quarantine or remote work or meeting requirements for employees, either by government order or on a voluntary basis. The pandemic may adversely affect our customers’ ability to perform their missions and is in many cases disrupting their operations. It may also impact the ability of our subcontractors, partners, and suppliers to operate and fulfill their contractual obligations, and result in an increase in their costs and cause delays in performance. These supply chain effects, and the direct effect of the virus and the disruption on our operations, may negatively impact both our ability to meet customer demand and our revenue and profit margins. Our employees, in some cases, are working remotely due either to safety concerns or to customer imposed limitations and using various technologies to perform their functions. We could see delays or changes in customer demand, particularly if government funding priorities change. Additionally, the disruption and volatility in the global and domestic capital markets may increase the cost of capital and limit our ability to access capital. Both the health and economic aspects of COVID-19 are highly fluid and the future course of each is uncertain. For these reasons and other reasons that may come to light if the coronavirus pandemic and associated protective or preventative measures expand, we may experience a material adverse effect on our business operations, revenues and financial condition, and our ability to execute on business or contract opportunities, including the TSA PreCheckTM enrollment program; however, its ultimate impact is highly uncertain and subject to change.

Our facilities or operations could be adversely affected by events outside of our control, such as natural disasters, wars or health epidemics.
We may be impacted by natural disasters, wars, power outages, health epidemics or pandemics, or other events outside of our control. If major disasters such as earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, fires, or other events occur, or our information system or communications network breaks down, operates improperly, or is unusable, our headquarters and other facilities may be seriously damaged, or we may have to stop or delay production and delivery of our solutions and services. Although we maintain crisis management and disaster response plans, such events could make it difficult or impossible for us to deliver our solutions and services to our customers, and could decrease demand for our offerings. We may incur shutdowns, delays, disruptions or expenses relating to such events outside of our control, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. Because we do not carry insurance for all of these possible losses, and significant recovery time could be required to resume operations, our financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected by such an event outside of our control.

Our U.S. Government contracts are subject to competitive bidding, both upon initial issuance and re-competition. If we are unable to successfully compete in the bidding process or if we fail to win re-competitions, it could adversely affect our operating performance and lead to an unexpected loss of revenue.
Substantially all of our U.S. Government contracts are awarded through a competitive bidding process upon initial award and renewal, and we expect that this will continue to be the case. There is often significant competition and pricing pressure as a result of this process. The competitive bidding process presents a number of risks, including the following:

we may expend substantial funds and time to prepare bids and proposals for contracts that may ultimately be awarded to one of our competitors;
we may be unable to accurately estimate the resources and costs that will be required to perform any contract we are awarded, which could result in substantial cost overruns;
we may encounter expense and delay if our competitors protest or challenge awards of contracts, and any such protest or challenge could result in a requirement to resubmit bids on modified specifications or in the termination, reduction or modification of the awarded contract. Additionally, the protest of contracts awarded to us may result in the delay of program performance and the generation of revenue while the protest is pending; and
if we are not given the opportunity to re-compete for U.S. Government contracts previously awarded to us, we may incur expenses to protect such decision and ultimately may not succeed in competing for or winning such contract renewal.

The U.S. Government contracts for which we compete typically have multiple option periods, and if we fail to win a contract or a task order, we generally will be unable to compete again for that contract for several years. If we fail to win new contracts or to receive renewal contracts upon re-competition, it may result in additional costs and expenses and possible loss of revenue, and we will not have an opportunity to compete for these contract opportunities again until such contracts expire.

U.S. Government contracts generally are not fully funded at inception and are subject to amendment or termination, which places a significant portion of our revenues at risk and could adversely impact our earnings.
Our U.S. Government sales are funded by customer budgets, which operate on an October-to-September fiscal year. In February of each year, the President of the United States presents to the Congress the budget for the upcoming fiscal year. This budget proposes funding levels for every federal agency and is the result of months of policy and program reviews throughout the Executive branch. From February through September of each year, the appropriations and authorization committees of Congress review the President’s budget proposals and establish the funding levels for the upcoming fiscal year in appropriations and authorization legislation. Once these levels are enacted into law, the Executive Office of the President administers the funds to the agencies. There are two primary risks associated with this process. First, the process may be delayed or disrupted. Changes in congressional schedules, negotiations for program funding levels or unforeseen world events can interrupt the funding for a program or contract. Second, funds for multi-year contracts can be changed in subsequent years in the appropriations process. In addition, the U.S. Government has increasingly relied on IDIQ contracts and other procurement vehicles that are subject to a competitive bidding and funding process even after the award of the basic contract, adding an additional element of uncertainty to future funding levels. Delays in the funding process or changes in funding or funding priorities can impact the timing of available funds or can lead to changes in program content or termination at the government’s convenience. The loss of anticipated funding or the termination of multiple or large programs could have an adverse effect on our future sales and earnings. The health and economic crisis created by the Coronavirus pandemic, and the substantial increase in federal spending devoted to addressing multiple aspects of the crisis, might cause changes in federal or agency spending priorities that might impact our customer’s willingness or ability to continue or extend our contracts or procure contracts which we otherwise, in the absence of the crisis, might have secured.

We are subject to substantial oversight from federal agencies that have the authority to suspend our ability to bid on contracts.
As a U.S. Government contractor, we are subject to oversight by many agencies and entities of the U.S. Government that may investigate and make inquiries of our business practices and conduct audits of contract performance and cost accounting. Depending on the results of any such audits and investigations, the U.S. Government may make claims against us. Under U.S. Government procurement regulations and practices, an indictment of a U.S. Government contractor could result in that contractor being fined and/or suspended for a period of time from eligibility for bidding on, or for the award of, new U.S. Government contracts. A conviction could result in debarment for a specified period of time. To the best of management’s knowledge, there are no pending investigations, inquiries, claims or audits against the Company likely to have a material adverse effect on our business or our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

We enter into fixed-price and other contracts that could subject us to losses if we experience cost growth that cannot be billed to customers.
Generally, our customer contracts are either fixed-priced or cost reimbursable contracts. Under fixed-priced contracts, which represented approximately 84.3% of our 2020 revenues, we receive a fixed price irrespective of the actual costs we incur and, consequently, we carry the burden of any cost overruns. Due to their nature, fixed-priced contracts inherently have more risk than cost reimbursable contracts, particularly fixed-price development contracts where the costs to complete the development stage of the program can be highly variable, uncertain and difficult to estimate. Under cost reimbursable contracts, subject to a contract-ceiling amount in certain cases, we are reimbursed for allowable costs and paid a fee, which may be fixed or performance based. If our costs exceed the contract ceiling and are not authorized by the customer or are not allowable under the contract or applicable regulations, we may not be able to obtain reimbursement for all such costs and our fees may be reduced or eliminated. Because many of our contracts involve advanced designs and innovative technologies, we may experience unforeseen technological difficulties and cost overruns. Under both types of contracts, if we are unable to control costs or if our initial cost estimates are incorrect, we can lose money on these contracts. In addition, some of our contracts have provisions relating to cost controls and audit rights, and if we fail to meet the terms specified in those contracts, we may not realize their full benefits. Lower earnings caused by cost overruns and cost controls would have a negative impact on our results of operations.

We depend on third parties in order to fully perform under our contracts and the failure of a third party to perform could have an adverse impact on our earnings.
We rely on subcontractors and other companies to provide raw materials, major components and subsystems for our products or to perform a portion of the services that we provide to our customers. Occasionally, we rely on only one or two sources of supply, which, if disrupted, could have an adverse effect on our ability to meet our commitments to customers. We depend on these subcontractors and vendors to fulfill their contractual obligations in a timely and satisfactory manner in full compliance with customer requirements. If one or more of our subcontractors or suppliers is unable to satisfactorily provide on a timely basis the agreed-upon supplies or perform the agreed-upon services, our ability to perform our obligations as a prime contractor may be adversely affected.

Our future profitability depends, in part, on our ability to develop new technologies and maintain a qualified workforce to meet the needs of our customers.
Virtually all of the products that we produce and sell are highly engineered and require sophisticated manufacturing and system integration techniques and capabilities. The government market in which we primarily operate is characterized by rapidly changing technologies. The product and program needs of our government and commercial customers change and evolve regularly. Accordingly, our future performance in part depends on our ability to identify emerging technological trends, develop and manufacture competitive products, and bring those products to market quickly at cost-effective prices. In addition, because of the highly specialized nature of our business, we must be able to hire and retain the skilled and appropriately qualified personnel necessary to perform the services required by our customers. If we are unable to develop new products that meet customers’ changing needs or successfully attract and retain qualified personnel, future sales and earnings may be adversely affected.

The business environment in which we operate is highly competitive and may impair our ability to achieve revenue growth.
We operate in industry segments that are diverse. Based upon our current market analysis, there is no single company or small group of companies in a dominant competitive position. Some large competitors offer capabilities in a number of markets that overlap many of the same areas in which we offer services, while certain companies are focused upon only one or a few of such markets.  Some of the firms that compete with us in multiple areas include: Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics. In addition, we compete with smaller specialty companies, including risk and compliance management companies, organizational messaging companies, and security consulting organizations, and companies that provide secure network offerings. If we do not compete effectively, we may suffer price reductions, reduced gross margins, and loss of market share.

Some of our security solutions have lengthy sales and implementation cycles, which could significantly impact our results of operations if projected orders are not realized.
We market the majority of our security solutions directly to U.S. Government customers. The sale and implementation of our services to these entities typically involves a lengthy education process and a significant technical evaluation and commitment of capital and other resources. This process is also subject to the risk of delays associated with customers’ internal budgeting and other procedures for approving large capital expenditures, deploying new technologies within their networks and testing and accepting new technologies that affect key operations. As a result, the sales and implementation cycles associated with certain of our services can be lengthy. Our quarterly and annual operating results could be materially harmed if orders forecasted for a specific customer for a particular quarter are not realized.

Our business could be negatively affected by cyber or other security threats or other disruptions.
As a cybersecurity company and a U.S. defense contractor, we face cyber threats, threats to the physical security of our facilities and employees, and terrorist acts. We also are exposed to the potential for business disruptions associated with information technology failures, natural disasters, or public health or economic crises, such as that created by the Coronavirus pandemic. We routinely experience cyber security threats, threats to our information technology infrastructure and attempts to gain access to our sensitive information, as do our customers, suppliers, subcontractors and joint venture partners. We may experience similar security threats at customer sites that we operate and manage as a contractual requirement. Prior cyber attacks directed at us have not had a material impact on our financial results, and we believe our threat detection and mitigation processes and procedures are adequate. The threats we face vary from attacks common to most industries to more advanced and persistent, highly organized adversaries who target us because we protect national security information. If we are unable to protect sensitive information, our customers or governmental authorities could question the adequacy of our threat mitigation and detection processes and procedures.  Due to the evolving nature of these security threats, however, the impact of any future incident cannot be predicted. Occurrence of any of these events could adversely affect our internal operations, the services we provide to our customers, loss of competitive advantages derived from our research and development efforts or other intellectual property, early obsolescence of our products and services, our future financial results, or our reputation.

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, our revenues may be impacted adversely by the unauthorized use of our products and services.
Our success depends on our internally developed technologies, patents and other intellectual property. Despite our precautions, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use our trade secrets or other forms of intellectual property without authorization. Furthermore, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our proprietary rights in those countries to the same extent U.S. law protects these rights in the United States. In addition, it is possible that others may independently develop substantially equivalent intellectual property. If we do not effectively protect our intellectual property, our business could suffer. In the future, we may have to resort to litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. This type of litigation, regardless of its outcome, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and technical resources.

If we are unable to license third-party technology that is used in our products and services to perform key functions, the loss could have an adverse effect on our revenues.
The third-party technology licenses used by us may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Our business could suffer if we lost the rights to use these technologies. A third-party could claim that the licensed software infringes a patent or other proprietary right. Litigation between the licensor and a third-party or between us and a third-party could lead to royalty obligations for which we are not indemnified or for which indemnification is insufficient, or we may not be able to obtain any additional license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. The loss of, or our inability to obtain or maintain, any of these technology licenses could delay the introduction of new products or services until equivalent technology, if available, is identified, licensed and integrated. This could harm our business.

We are involved in a number of legal proceedings. We cannot predict the outcome of litigation and other contingencies with certainty.
Our business may be adversely affected by the outcome of legal proceedings and other contingencies that cannot be predicted with certainty. As required by GAAP, we estimate loss contingencies and establish reserves based on our assessment of contingencies where liability is deemed probable and the amount of loss is reasonably estimable in light of the facts and circumstances known to us at a particular point in time. Subsequent developments in legal proceedings may affect our assessment of the potential for liability and our estimates of the loss contingency recorded as a liability or as a reserve against assets in our financial statements. For a description of our current legal proceedings, see Note 13 – Commitments, Contingencies and Subsequent Events to the consolidated financial statements.

Any potential future acquisitions, strategic investments, divestitures, mergers or joint ventures may subject us to significant risks, any of which could harm our business.
Our long-term strategy may include identifying and acquiring, investing in or merging with suitable candidates on acceptable terms, or divesting of certain business lines or activities. In particular, over time, we may acquire, make investments in, or merge with providers of product offerings that complement our business or may terminate such activities. Mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures include a number of risks and present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including but not limited to:
diversion of management attention from running our existing business;
possible material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting;
increased expenses including legal, administrative and compensation expenses related to newly hired or terminated employees;
increased costs to integrate the technology, personnel, customer base and business practices of the acquired company with us;
potential exposure to material liabilities not discovered in the due diligence process;
potential adverse effects on reported operating results due to possible write-down of goodwill and other intangible assets associated with acquisitions; and
unavailability of acquisition financing or unavailability of such financing on reasonable terms.

Any acquired business, technology, service or product could significantly under-perform relative to our expectations, and may not achieve the benefits we expect from possible acquisitions. For all these reasons, our pursuit of an acquisition, investment, divestiture, merger, or joint venture could cause its actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.

Weakened global economic conditions may adversely affect our industry, business, operating results and financial condition.
Our overall performance depends in part on worldwide economic and geopolitical conditions. The United States and other key international economies have experienced cyclical downturns from time to time in which economic activity was impacted by falling demand for a variety of goods and services, restricted credit, poor liquidity, reduced corporate profitability, volatility in credit, equity and foreign exchange markets, bankruptcies and overall uncertainty with respect to the economy. These economic conditions can arise suddenly and the full impact of such conditions can remain uncertain at any point in time. In addition, geopolitical developments, such as potential trade wars,the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, can increase levels of political and economic unpredictability globally and increase the volatility of global financial markets. Moreover, these conditions can affect the rate of information technology spending and could adversely affect our customers’customers' ability or willingness to purchase our solutions and services, delay prospective customers’customers' purchasing decisions, reduce the value or duration of their subscription contracts, or affect attrition rates, all of which could adversely affect our future sales and operating results.

Increased scrutiny of our environmental, social and governance responsibilities may result in additional costs and risks, and may adversely impact our reputation, employee retention, and willingness of customers and suppliers to do business with us.
ClimInvestor advocacy groups, institutional investors, investment funds, proxy advisory services, stockholders, and customers are increasingly focused on companies' ESG practices. Additionally, public interest and legislative pressure related to public companies' ESG practices continue to grow. If our ESG practices fail to meet regulatory requirements or investor or other industry stakeholders' evolving expectations and standards for responsible corporate citizenship in areas including environmental stewardship, support for local communities, Board of Director and employee diversity, human capital management, employee health and safety practices, product quality, supply chain management, corporate governance and transparency and employing ESG strategies in our operations, our brand, reputation and employee retention may be negatively impacted and customers and suppliers may be unwilling to do business with us. In addition, as we work to align our ESG practices with industry standards, we will likely continue to expand our disclosures in these areas and doing so may result in additional costs and require additional resources to monitor, report, and comply with our various ESG practices. If we fail to adopt ESG standards or practices as quickly as stakeholders desire, report on our ESG efforts or practices accurately, or satisfy the expectations of stakeholders, our reputation, business, financial performance and growth may be adversely impacted.
Changes in accounting principles or their application to us could result in unfavorable accounting charges or effects, which could adversely affect our results of operations and growth prospects.
We prepare consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In particular, we make certain estimates and assumptions related to the adoption and interpretation of these principles, including the recognition of our revenue and the accounting of our stock-based compensation expense with respect to our consolidated financial statements. If these assumptions turn out to be incorrect, our revenue or our stock-based compensation expense could materially differ from our expectations, which could have ate material adverse effect on our financial results. A change in any of these principles or guidance, or in their interpretations or application to us, may have a long-term impactsignificant effect on our business.reported results, as well as our processes and related controls, and may retroactively affect previously reported results or our forecasts, which may negatively impact our financial statements. For example, any recent new standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board could materially impact our consolidated financial statements. The adoption of these new standards may potentially require enhancements or changes in our processes or systems and may require significant time and cost on behalf of our financial management. This may, in turn, adversely affect our results of operations and growth prospects.
While we seek to mitigateGlobal climate-related risks could negatively affect our business risks associated with climate change by establishing robust environmental programs, we recognize that therebusiness.
There are inherent climate relatedclimate-related risks wherever business is conducted. Access to clean water and reliable energy in the communities where we conduct our business, whether for our offices, vendors, customers or other stakeholders, is a priority. Any of our primary locations may be vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change. Climate relatedClimate-related events, including the increasing frequency of extreme weather events and their impact on U.S. critical infrastructure, have the potential to disrupt our business, our third partythird-party suppliers, or the operations and/orand business of our customers, and may cause us to experience higher attrition, losses and additional costs to maintain or resume operations.

Any failureIncreased public awareness and concern regarding global climate change may result in state, federal or international requirements to reduce or mitigate global warming, such as the imposition of carbon pricing mechanisms or stricter limits on greenhouse gas emissions. If environmental or climate-change laws or regulations are adopted or changed that impose significant new costs, operational restrictions or compliance requirements upon our delivery of high-quality technical support services may adversely affectbusiness or our relationships with our customers and our financial results.
Our customers depend on our support organization to resolve technical issues relating to our solutions and offerings. We may be unable to respond quickly enough to accommodate short-term increases in customer demand for support services. Increased customer demand for these services, without corresponding revenues,products, they could increase costsour capital expenditures, reduce our margins and adversely affect our operating results. financial position.
In addition, our sales process is highly dependent on our solutions and business reputation and on positive recommendations from our existing customers. Any failure to maintain high-quality technical support, or a market perception that we do not maintain high-quality support, could adversely affect our reputation, our ability to sell our offerings to existing and prospective customers, and our business, operating results and financial position.

We may lose key members of our management team, development and operations personnel, or subject matter experts, andclient relationships may be unable to attract and retain employees we need to support our operations and growth.
Our success depends substantially upon the continued services of our executive officers and other key members of management, particularly our chief executive officer. From time to time, there may be changes in our executive management team resulting from the hiring or departure of executives. Such changes in our executive management team may be disruptive to our business. We are also substantially dependent on the continued service of our existing development and operations personnel and subject matter experts because of the complexity of our services and technologies. The loss of one or more of our key employees or groups could seriously harm our business.

The technology industry is subject to substantial and continuous competition for engineers and other subject matter experts with high levels of experience in designing, developing and managing software, cybersecurity, and Internet-related services, as well as competition for sales executives, data scientists and operations personnel. We may not be successful in attracting and retaining qualified personnel. We have from time to time experienced, and we expect to continue to experience, difficulty in hiring, developing, integrating and retaining highly skilled employees with appropriate qualifications. These difficulties may be amplified by evolving restrictions on immigration, travel, or availability of visas for skilled technology workers. These difficulties may potentially be further amplified by the high cost of living in Washington D.C. metropolitan area, where our headquarters and one of our other offices are located. If we fail to attract new personnel or fail to retain and motivate our current personnel, our business and future growth prospects could be severely harmed.

If our customers do not renew their subscriptions or contracts for our solutions and services, our revenue could decline and our business may suffer.
Our customers have no obligation to renew or extend their subscriptions or contracts for our solutions or services after the expiration of the contractual period, which vary in length, and in the normal course of business, some customers have elected not to renew or extend.  It is difficult to predict attrition rates given the varying needs of our customer base. Our attrition rates may increase or fluctuatedamaged as a result of a number of factors,our practices related to climate change, including customer dissatisfaction with our services, customers’ spending levels, mix of customer base, decreases in the number of users at our customers, competition, pricing increases or changes and deteriorating general economic conditions or budgetary constraints.

Our future success also depends in part on our ability to sell additional features and services, more subscriptions or enhanced editions of our services to our current customers. This may also require increasingly sophisticated and costly sales efforts that are targeted at senior leaders. Similarly, the rate at which our customers purchase new or enhanced services depends on a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control.

If customers do not renew or extend their subscriptions or contracts, do not purchase additional features or enhanced solutions, or if attrition rates increase, our business could be harmed.

If our security measures or those of our third-party data center hosting facilities, cloud computing platform providers or third-party service partners, or the underlying infrastructure of the internet are breached, and unauthorized access is obtained to a customer’s data, our datainvolvement, or our IT systems,clients' involvement, in certain industries or authorized access is blockedprojects associated with causing or disabled, our services may be perceived as not being secure, customers may curtail or stop using our services, and we may incur significant reputational harm, legal exposure and liabilities, or a negative financial impact.

Our services sometimes involve the storage and transmission of our customers’ and our customers' customers' proprietary and other sensitive data, including financial information and personally identifiable information. While we have security measures in place to protect our customers and our customers’ customers' data, our services and underlying infrastructure may in the future be materially breached or compromised as a result of the following:
third party attempts to fraudulently induce employees or customers into disclosing sensitive information such as user names, passwords or other information to gain access to our customers’ data, our data or our IT systems;
efforts by individuals or groups of hackers and sophisticated organizations, including state-sponsored organizations or nation-states;
cyber-attacks on our internally built infrastructure;
vulnerabilities resulting from enhancements and updates to our existing solutions;
vulnerabilities in the products or components across the broad ecosystem that our services operate in or are dependent on;
vulnerabilities existing within newly acquired or integrated technologies and infrastructures;
attacks on, or vulnerabilities in, the many different underlying networks and services that power the internet that our products depend on, most of which are not under our control or the control of our vendors, partners, or customers; and
employee or contractor errors or intentional acts that compromise our security systems.

These risks are mitigated, to the extent possible, by our ability to maintain and improve business and data governance policies, enhanced processes and internal security controls, including our ability to escalate and respond to known and potential risks. Although we have developed systems and processes designed to protect our customers’ and our customers’ customers’ sensitive data,exacerbating climate change, as well as any decisions we make to continue to conduct or change our data, we can provide no assurances that such measures will provide absolute security. In the normal course of business, we are the target of malicious cyber-attack attempts. To date, any such attempts have not been material or significantactivities in response to us, includingconsiderations relating to our reputation or business operations, or had a material financial impact, but there can be no assurance that future cyberattacks will not be material or significant.

A security breach or incident could result in unauthorized parties obtaining access to, or the denial of authorized access to, our IT systems or data, or our customers' systems or data, including intellectual property, proprietary, sensitive, or other confidential information. A security breach could also result in a loss of confidence in the security of our services, damage our reputation, negatively impact our future sales, disrupt our business and lead to increases in insurance premiums and legal and financial exposure and liability. Finally, the detection, prevention and remediation of known or potential security vulnerabilities, including those arising from third-party hardware or software, may result in additional financial burdens due to additional direct and indirect costs, such as additional infrastructure capacity spending to mitigate any system degradation.

Our ability to deliver our services is dependent on the development and maintenance of the infrastructure of the Internet by third parties.
The Internet’s infrastructure is comprised of many different networks and services that are highly fragmented and distributed by design. This infrastructure is run by a series of independent third-party organizations that work together to provide the infrastructure and supporting services of the Internet under the governance of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Numbers and Names (ICANN) and the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), now under the stewardship of ICANN.

The Internet has experienced a variety of outages and other delays as a result of damages to portions of its infrastructure, denial-of-service attacks or related cyber incidents, and it could face outages and delays in the future. These outages and delays could reduce the level of Internet usage or result in fragmentation of the Internet, resulting in multiple separate Internets. These scenarios are not under our control and could reduce the availability of the Internet to us or our customers for delivery of our Internet-related services. Any resulting interruptions in our services or the ability of our customers to access our services could result in a loss of potential or existing customers and harm our business.

climate change.
25
23

Sales to customers outside the United States expose us to risks inherent in international operations.
We sell our services outside the United States and are subject to risks and challenges associated with international business. We intend to continue to expand our international sales efforts. The risks and challenges associated with sales to customers outside the United States or those that can affect international operations generally, include:
localization of our services, including translation into foreign languages and associated expenses;
regulatory frameworks or business practices favoring local competitors;
pressure on the creditworthiness of sovereign nations;
evolving domestic and international tax environments;
liquidity issues or political actions by sovereign nations, including nations with a controlled currency environment, which could result in decreased values of these balances or potential difficulties protecting our foreign assets or satisfying local obligations;
foreign currency fluctuations and controls, which may make our services more expensive for international customers and could add volatility to our operating results;
compliance with multiple, conflicting, ambiguous or evolving governmental laws and regulations, including employment, tax, privacy, anti-corruption, import/export, antitrust, data transfer, storage and protection, and industry-specific laws and regulations, including rules related to compliance by our third-party resellers and our ability to identify and respond timely to compliance issues when they occur;
vetting and monitoring our third-party resellers in new and evolving markets to confirm they maintain standards consistent with our brand and reputation;
uncertainty regarding regulation, currency, tax, and operations resulting from the Brexit vote that could disrupt trade, the sale of our services and commerce, and movement of our people between the United Kingdom, European Union, and locations;
changes in the public perception of governments in the regions where we operate or plan to operate;
regional data privacy laws and other regulatory requirements;
treatment of revenue from international sources, intellectual property considerations and changes to tax codes, including being subject to foreign tax laws and being liable for paying withholding income or other taxes in foreign jurisdictions;
different pricing environments;
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;
different or lesser protection of our intellectual property;
longer accounts receivable payment cycles and other collection difficulties;
natural disasters, acts of war, terrorism, pandemics or security breaches; and
regional economic and political conditions.

Any of these factors could negatively impact our business and results of operations. The above factors may also negatively impact our ability to successfully expand into emerging market countries, where we have little or no operating experience, where it can be costly and challenging to establish and maintain operations, including hiring and managing required personnel, and difficult to promote our brand, and where we may not benefit from any first-to-market advantage or otherwise succeed.

We are subject to governmental export and import controls that could impair our ability to compete in international markets and subject us to liability if we are not in full compliance with applicable laws.
Some of our solutions are subject to export and import controls, including the Commerce Department’s Export Administration Regulations, U.S. Customs regulations and various economic and trade sanctions regulations established by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. If we fail to comply with these U.S. export control laws and import laws we and certain of our employees could be subject to substantial civil or criminal penalties, including the possible loss of export or import privileges; fines, which may be imposed on us and responsible employees or managers; and, in extreme cases, the incarceration of responsible employees or managers. Obtaining the necessary authorizations, including any required license, may be time-consuming, is not guaranteed and may result in the delay or loss of sales opportunities. Furthermore, the U.S. export control laws and economic sanctions laws prohibit the shipment of certain products and services to U.S. embargoed or sanctioned countries, governments and persons. Even though we take precautions to prevent our solutions from being provisioned or provided to U.S. sanctions targets in violation of applicable regulations, our solutions could be provisioned to those targets despite such precautions. Any such sales could have negative consequences, including government investigations, penalties and reputational harm. Changes in our solutions or changes in export and import regulations may create delays in the introduction, sale and deployment of our solutions in international markets or prevent the export or import of our solutions to certain countries, governments or persons altogether. Any decreased use of our solutions or limitation on our ability to export or sell our solutions may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity
Company’s processes to assess, identify, and manage material cybersecurity risks
We have developed an ISO/IEC 27001-certified Information Security Management System (“ISMS”) designed to enhance our corporate security measures, identify and mitigate information security risks, and protect and preserve the confidentiality, integrity, and continued availability of all information owned by the Company and that of its customers and suppliers in our control. Our ISO certification can be verified on the BSI Group website using certificate number IS 64920.
Our ISMS includes developing, implementing, and continually improving policies and procedures designed to safeguard information and ensure the availability of critical data and systems. These policies cover areas such as requiring secure coding practices and a secure development lifecycle process, monthly information security awareness training for all employees and enhanced training for specialized personnel, review and assessment by external, independent third parties, who certify and report on our weaknesses and internal response preparedness for the entire Company, and the performance of daily vulnerability scanning of our network infrastructure as well as annual third-party penetration testing.
Our cybersecurity risk assessment, identification, and management process consists of a dedicated Governance Risk and Compliance ("GRC") team, within our Information Security organization, that implements a repeatable, ISO/IEC 27001-compliant methodology to asses and track cybersecurity risk. This team, reporting to and working with the Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO"), identifies, tracks, and updates cybersecurity risks that threaten the Company directly and through third parties. The GRC team collaborates closely with risk owners throughout the Company, vendors, and suppliers, working with them in an effort to ensure their risks are identified, documented, and mitigated in a timely fashion.
In addition to our active ISO/IEC 27001 certification, the Company also assesses itself against the National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-171 as required by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement. In accordance with our ISMS, we also actively monitor known threats that could affect our products and services and work with our suppliers to provide us with real-time reports of threats or vulnerabilities that may affect our enterprise-wide systems. Our program also includes a cyber incident response plan that provides controls and procedures for timely and accurate reporting of any material cybersecurity incident as well as a business continuity plan that is designed to provide a clear framework for how the Company can continue in the event of any significant disruption in an effort to ensure that we can offer the same level of security, support, and excellence to all our customers. In the normal course, our Security and GRC teams engage assessors, consultants, and other third parties to assist in various cyber-related matters. For example, to maintain our ISO certification, the Company utilizes an external third party to conduct yearly audits of its ISMS. Our Information Security organization also leverages third-party advisors, as appropriate, for various tasks such as conducting annual third-party penetration testing.
In 2023, we conducted an enterprise risk assessment that included an assessment of cybersecurity risk in context with other enterprise-level risks. Furthermore, our CISO and our General Counsel regularly discuss cybersecurity risk mitigation. We carry errors and omissions insurance that provides some protection against the potential losses arising from a cybersecurity incident. For additional information regarding potential cybersecurity risks, see relevant business and operational risks under Item 1A, "Risk Factors", of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In the last three years, we have not experienced a material information security breach incident or any penalties or settlements related to the same, and the expenses we have incurred from information security breach incidents were immaterial.
Management’s role and expertise in assessing and managing material cybersecurity risks
Our Information Security team is charged with the responsibility for assessing and managing material cybersecurity risks. That team is led by our CISO. Certifications held by the Information Security team include CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Project+, & CyberSecurity Analyst+, eLearnSecurity Junior Penetration Tester, EC-Council Certified Ethical Hacker ("CEH"), Certified Encryption Specialist, Certified Security Analyst, & Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator ("CHFI"), CMMC-AB Registered Practitioner ("RP"), and ISC2 Certified Information Systems Security Professional ("CISSP"). Our CISO’s background includes over 17 years of experience in IT and Information Security. His formal education includes a Master’s degree in Cybersecurity and Information Assurance and a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Forensics. Certifications held by the CISO include CompTIA A+, Network+, & Security+, Microsoft Technology Associate ("MTA"), CMMC-AB RP, ISO 27001 Certified Lead Implementer Professional, EC-Council CEH & CHFI, ISACA Certified Data Privacy Solutions Engineer & Certified Information Security Manager, ISC2 CISSP, and Offensive Security Certified Professional. Our CISO reports to our Chief Information Technology Officer ("CITO"), who in turn reports to our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"). Each of our CITO and our CEO have extensive experience in cybersecurity matters.
26
24

Our CISO provides reports to the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors on a standing basis at each Audit Committee meeting, and as otherwise requested by the Chair of the Audit Committee or as determined necessary by the CISO or other members of senior management. The CISO is personally involved in, and responsible for, the risk assessment, identification and management process described above.
Board of Director’s oversight of cybersecurity risks
The Board of Directors has oversight responsibility with respect to risk management and reviews matters with management as part of management’s regular Board reporting. The Board of Directors has delegated responsibility for information security and cybersecurity risk oversight to the Audit Committee. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee discharges these responsibilities through various processes, including the option to use third party advisers as and when it deems appropriate, and discusses with management the Company’s major policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee regularly reports the results of these discussions to the Board of Directors. As noted above, the CISO reports to the Audit Committee at each regular Audit Committee meeting on the status of cybersecurity risk assessment, identification and management, as well as reporting information security incidents as they occur, if material, and providing periodic briefings about our information security program, our internal response preparedness, and assessments led by outside advisors. The Chair of the Audit Committee, in turn, reports on these topics to the Board of Directors as and when deemed necessary and/or material. Overall, our Board contains two directors with work experience related to cybersecurity issues or oversight.
Item 2. Properties

We lease approximately 191,700 square feet of space for our corporate headquarters, integration facility, and primary service depot in Ashburn, Virginia. The lease expires in May 2029.

We leaseleased additional office space in facilities located in Maryland, New JerseyFlorida and Nevada under various leases expiring through January 2024.

July 2027.
We believe that the current space is substantially adequate to meet our operating requirements.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Hamot et al. v. Telos Corporation

As previously disclosedInformation regarding legal proceedings may be found in Note 13 of19 Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, beginning on August 2, 2007, Messrs. Seth W. Hamot (“Hamot”) and Andrew R. Siegel (“Siegel”), principals of Costa Brava Partnership III, L.P. (“Costa Brava”), were involved in litigation against the Company as Plaintiffs and Counter-defendants in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland (the “Circuit Court”). Mr. Siegel was a Class D Director of the Company and Mr. Hamot was a Class D Director of the Company until his resignation on March 9, 2018. The Plaintiffs initially alleged that certain documents and records had not been provided to them promptly and were necessary to fulfill their duties as directors of the Company. Subsequently, Hamot and Siegel further alleged that the Company had failed to follow certain provisions concerning the noticing of Board committee meetings and the recording of Board meeting minutes and, additionally, that Mr. John Wood’s service as both CEO and Chairman of the Board was improper and impermissible under the Company’s Bylaws. On April 23, 2008, the Company filed a counterclaim against Hamot and Siegel for money damages and preliminary and injunctive relief based upon Hamot and Siegel’s interference with, and improper influence of, the Company’s independent auditors regarding, among other things, a specific accounting treatment.  On June 27, 2008, the Circuit Court granted the Company’s motion for preliminary injunction and enjoined Hamot and Siegel from contacting the Company’s auditors until the completion of the Company’s Form 10-K for the preceding year, which injunction later expired by its own terms. As previously disclosed, trial on Hamot and Siegel’s claims and the Company’s counterclaims took place in July through September 2013, and the Court subsequently issued decisions on the various claims by way of memorandum opinions and orders dated September 11, 2017. Among other rulings, the Court found Hamot and Siegel liable for the intentional tort of tortious interference with the Company’s contractual relationship with one of its auditors and entered a monetary judgment in favor of the Company and against Hamot and Siegel for approximately $278,000. The Company’s subsequent appeal of the amount of damages awarded to it for Hamot and Siegel’s intentional interference was ultimately dismissed by way of the Mandate issued by the Court of Appeals of Maryland on October 11, 2019.Statements.

Hamot (and later, his Estate) and Siegel on multiple occasions during this litigation have sought to be indemnified or to be awarded advancement of various attorney’s fees and expenses incurred by them in this litigation.  On October 20, 2020, Hamot’s Estate and Siegel (together the “Plaintiffs”) filed their latest Motion for Indemnification of Legal Fees and Expenses against the Company in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and a Request for a Hearing.  The Motion demands that the Company indemnify the Plaintiffs for legal fees and expenses incurred in the sum of $2,540,000.  The Company filed an Opposition to the Motion on November 4, 2020. On January 28, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to File Amended Motion for Indemnification of Legal Fees and Expenses, which the Company opposed, and which was granted by the Court on February 23, 2021, and briefing of the Amended Motion for Indemnification of Legal Fees and Expenses (“Amended Motion”) continues. A hearing is scheduled before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Indemnification of Legal Fees and Expenses for May 18, 2021. The Company denies that it has any liability for indemnification to the Plaintiffs and intends to vigorously defend the matter through its opposition to the Amended Motion and further proceedings.

At this stage of the litigation, it is impossible to reasonably determine the degree of probability related to the Company’s success in relation to this claim by Hamot’s Estate and Siegel for indemnification for certain attorney’s fees and expenses incurred in this litigation. The Company intends to vigorously defend the matter.
Other Litigation

In addition, the Company is a party to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business.  In the opinion of management, while the results of such litigation cannot be predicted with any reasonable degree of certainty, the final outcome of such known matters will not, based upon all available information, have a material adverse effect on the Company's condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

27
25

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “TLS”.  "TLS."
As of December 31, 2020,March 8, 2024, there were approximately 231 registered152 holders of record of Telos common stock, par value $0.001 par value. The number of shareholders of record of our common stock may not includingbe representative of the number of personsbeneficial owners due to shares that may be held by depositories, brokers or entities whose stock is held in nominee or "street" name through various brokerage firms. There was no public marketnominees.
For information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our common stock prior to November 19, 2020.

Performance Graph
This performance graph shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), or otherwise subjectstock-based compensation plan, see Note 12 Stock-Based Compensation to the liabilities underConsolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8.
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
There were no sales of unregistered equity securities during the three months ended December 31, 2023, that Section, and shallwere not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of our filingsregistered under the Securities Act and were not previously disclosed on a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or a Current Report on Form 8-K.
Purchases of Equity Securities
On May 24, 2022, the Exchange Act.Board of Directors authorized a Share Repurchase Program ("SRP"), pursuant to which the Company can repurchase up to $50.0 million of issued and outstanding common stock. The shares may be repurchased on a discretionary basis from time to time through open market purchases. The repurchase program has no expiration date and may be modified, suspended, or terminated at any time.

The following graph compares the cumulative total return to stockholders on ourThere were no repurchases of common stock since November 19, 2020 (the date ourin fiscal year 2023, and approximately $38.7 million remained available for future common stock commenced trading onrepurchases under the NASDAQ National Market) relative to the cumulative total returnsSRP as of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the Standard & Poor’s Information Technology Index over the same period. An investment of $100 (with reinvestment of all dividends) is assumed to have been made in our common stock and in each index at the market close on November 19, 2020, and its relative performance is tracked through December 31, 2020. The returns shown are based on historical results and are not intended to suggest future performance.2023.


Item 6. [Reserved]


None
28
26

Table of Contents
Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following should be read in connection with the accompanying information presented in Item 7 and Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

OPERATING RESULTS

  Years Ended December 31, 
  
2020
  
2019
  
2018
  
2017
  
2016
 
  (amounts in thousands) 
Sales $179,917  $159,218  $138,016  $107,727  $134,868 
Operating income (loss)  297   5,025   9,014   414   2,112 
Income (loss) income before income taxes  6,795   (2,241)  1,768   (6,265)  (3,335)
Net income (loss) attributable to Telos Corporation  1,687   (6,401)  (1,640)  (5,833)  (7,175)


FINANCIAL CONDITION

  As of December 31, 
  
2020
  
2019
  
2018
  
2017
  
2016
 
  (amounts in thousands) 
Total assets $183,817  $77,692  $74,489  $74,421  $56,799 
Senior term loan (1)  ----   16,335   10,984   10,786   ---- 
Subordinated debt, long-term (1)  ----   2,927   2,597   2,289   ---- 
Finance lease obligations, long-term (2)  14,301   15,641   16,865   17,980   18,990 
Operating lease obligations, long-term (2)  941   1,553   ----   ----   ---- 
Deferred income taxes, long-term (3)  652   621   818   741   3,391 
Senior redeemable preferred stock (4)  ----   ----   ----   ----   2,092 
Public preferred stock (4)  ----   139,210   135,387   131,565   127,742 


(1)See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 regarding our debt obligations.
(2)See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 regarding our lease obligations.
(3)See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 regarding our income taxes.
(4)See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 regarding our redeemable preferred stock.


27

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes to consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K ("10-K"). In addition to historical financial information, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results and timing of selected events in future periods may differ materially from those anticipated or implied in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed under Item 1A, "Risk Factors", and elsewhere in this 10-K. See also "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" at the beginning of this 10-K.
GeneralIn this section, we discuss our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022.
Business Overview
For an overview of our business, including our business segments and discussion of our products and services we provide, see Item 1, "Business" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additional information regarding our segments is also presented in Note 18 Segment Information to the consolidated financial statements at Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Opportunities, Challenges and Risks
As discussed under Item 1A, "Risk Factors", we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from contracts and subcontracts with the U.S. government. Our revenues are generated from a number of contract vehicles and task orders. The U.S. government has increasingly relied on contracts that are subject to a competitive bidding process (including IDIQ, GSA schedules, OTA, and other multi-award contracts), which has resulted in greater competition and increased pricing pressure. We expect that a majority of the business that we seek in the foreseeable future will be awarded through a competitive bidding process.
Over the past several years we sought to diversify and improve our operating margins through an evolution of our business from an emphasis on product reselling to that of an advanced solutions technologies provider. Although we continue to offer technologically advanced, software-basedresold products through our contract vehicles, we have focused on selling solutions and outsourcing product sales, as well as designing and delivering Telos manufactured and branded technologies. We believe our contract portfolio is characterized as having low to moderate financial risk due to the limited number of long-term fixed-price development contracts. Our firm-fixed-price activities consist primarily of contracts for products and services at established contract prices. Our time-and-material contracts generally allow the pass-through of allowable costs plus a profit margin. For 2023 and 2022, the Company's revenue derived from firm-fixed-price contracts was 78.5% and 82.9%, respectively; cost-plus contracts revenue was 12.1% and 11.1%, respectively; and time-and-material contracts was 9.3% and 6.0%, respectively.
Our business performance is affected by the overall level of U.S. government spending and the alignment of our offerings and capabilities with the budget priorities of the U.S. government. Adverse changes in fiscal and economic conditions could materially impact our business. Some changes that could adversely impact our business include the implementation of future spending reductions and government shutdown. Despite the budget and competitive pressure affecting the industry, we believe we are well-positioned to expand existing customer relationships and benefit from opportunities that we have not previously pursued.
Business Environment
U.S. Budget
Congress has been unable to complete action on all appropriations bills for Fiscal Year ("FY") 2024, which began on October 1, 2023. Instead, Congress has resorted to approving a series of continuing resolutions (“CRs”), which have funded the government at FY2023 levels for over five months with no new program starts. Some appropriations bills were finally approved in early March 2024, but most federal spending remains under a CR.
This means the President’s proposed three percent increase in defense spending, which was also provided for by the spending caps contained in the debt ceiling legislation (the "Fiscal Responsibility Act”) signed into law last June 2023, have so far not been approved. The FY2024 National Defense Authorization Act enacted in December 2023 does not authorize that propose three percent hike in defense spending, but actual appropriated defense spending has remained at FY2023 levels under these CRs, and it will continue to be frozen until a full-year defense appropriations bill can be signed into law.
29

Table of Contents
The President's FY2024 budget also proposed increased investments for cybersecurity within numerous federal civilian departments and agencies. In general, the President's budget reflected the prioritization of accelerated cloud adoption, IT modernization, further private sector collaboration for sector risk management responsibilities, ensuring adequate cyber threat information sharing, and supply chain risk management. These priorities align with the solutions Telos has been developing and bringing to market for the past several years. However, as with defense spending, these proposed increases have remained on hold until Congress can agree on full-year FY2024 appropriation legislation for all department and agencies.
Even if Congress finally reaches agreement on the remaining FY2024 appropriations bills in March 2024, that will leave less than seven months for federal agencies to execute any increased spending levels these measures provide.
Finally, submission to Congress of the Biden Administration's proposed FY2025 budget was delayed until March 11, 2024 – a month later than normal – in large part because lawmakers have been unable to complete work on FY2024 appropriations legislation. Such final bills would normally serve as a detailed baseline from which the White House would develop next year's proposed budget.
This failure to approve the FY2024 appropriations legislation in a timely manner and the resultant uncertainty about actual funding has impacted federal customers' ability to move forward on their planned expenditures in FY2024, and to adequately plan for FY2025.
Cybersecurity Landscape
In recent years, we have seen cybersecurity threats become more complex, with threat actors leveraging a wide variety of tactics to exploit their victims. With this growing threat, below are some trends to consider when looking at the cybersecurity landscape:
Rising Threats, Rising Liability: Ransomware remains arguably the most severe cyber threat to enterprises in the commercial, state, and local government and education sectors. One reason for the rise of ransomware attacks is that it is exceedingly profitable for cybercriminals, and ransomware victims generally settle the ransom rather than restoring the system from backups or dealing with the fallout from a data breach. Aside from the financial costs of paying the ransom and restoring the system, the consequences of a successful ransomware attack can include damage to the organization's reputation, stolen sensitive data being used for malicious purposes, and loss of business.
The Nation's Critical Systems Are Still at Risk: Critical infrastructure and industrial IoT are among the categories at greatest risk of cyberattacks.
The Challenging Complexity of Regulatory Compliance: Government mandates stronger security in highly regulated industries. These government initiatives and audit fatigue continue to burden highly regulated organizations, with automation solutions being recognized as the most effective remedy for the many repetitive and redundant tasks that empowersecurity compliance requires.
Additionally, the SEC has finalized and protectadopted new cybersecurity rules for publicly traded companies, which will require registrants to disclose additional cyber-related information in their regulatory filings. Specifically, they will have to: (1) regularly disclose their governance methods, risk analysis and management processes; (2) meet specific disclosure requirements and deadlines for reporting and describing material cyber incidents; and (3) describe the world’s most security-consciousboard's oversight of risks from cybersecurity threats, and management's expertise and role in assessing and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats. The required reporting of this information will lead many companies to proactively establish policies that will improve their cyber risk management posture and enable them to better withstand heightened public and regulatory scrutiny.
Identity Assurance and Privacy Protection are Essential for Today's Enterprises: Identity and access management continues to be a major cybersecurity concern for organizations against rapidly evolving, sophisticated and pervasive threats. Our portfolio of security products, services and expertise empower our customers with capabilitiesindividuals that need to reach new markets, serve their stakeholders more effectively, and successfully defend the nation or their enterprise. We protect our customers’ people, information, and digital assets so they can pursue their corporate goals and conduct their global missions with confidence inensure their security and protect their privacy. Trusted identities are essential to confidence in IT and physical security strategies and to the success of Zero Trust security models and architectures.

Artificial Intelligence: Cybercriminals are using Artificial Intelligence ("AI") to launch more sophisticated attacks that can quickly adapt to changing environments, making detection harder. To protect against AI-powered cyberattacks, organizations must stay vigilant and adopt advanced cybersecurity tools and techniques that can detect and respond to these threats timely before they can cause damage.
30

Table of Contents
Backlog
Backlog is a useful measure in developing our annual budgeted revenue by estimating for the upcoming year our continuing business from existing customers and active contracts. We consider backlog, both funded and unfunded (as explained below), other expected annual renewals, and expansion planned by our current customers.
Total backlog consists of the aggregate contract revenues remaining to be earned by us at a given time over the life of our contracts, whether funded or unfunded. Funded backlog consists of the aggregate contract revenues remaining to be earned at a given time, which, in the case of U.S. government contracts, means that they have been funded by the procuring agency. Unfunded backlog is the difference between total backlog and funded backlog and includes potential revenues that may be earned if customers exercise delivery orders and/or renewal options to continue these contracts. Based on historical experience, we generally assume option year renewals to be exercised. Most of our customers fund contracts on the basis of one year or less, and, as a result, funded backlog is generally expected to be earned within one year from any point in time, whereas unfunded backlog is expected to be earned over a longer period.
Table MD&A 1: Backlog by Segment
As of December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Security Solutions
Funded backlog$24,538 $33,784 
Unfunded backlog41,398 47,509 
Total Security Solutions backlog65,936 81,293 
Secure Networks
Funded backlog27,530 48,454 
Unfunded backlog24,636 82,296 
Total Secure Networks backlog52,166 130,750 
Total
Funded backlog52,068 82,238 
Unfunded backlog66,034 129,805 
Total backlog$118,102 $212,043 
Increases in backlog is a result from the award of new contracts and the renewal or extension of existing contracts. Reductions in backlog arises from the completion or the early termination of contracts. See the relevant industry, legal and regulatory risks under Item 1A, "Risk Factors", of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe that comparisons of backlog period-to-period are difficult. We also believe that it is difficult to predict future revenue solely based on analysis of backlog. The actual timing of revenue from projects included in backlog will vary.
Financial Highlights
A number of factors have affected our fiscal year 2023 results, the most significant of which we have listed below. More details on these changes are presented below within our "Results of Operations" section.
The successful completion of certain programs, lower revenue on ongoing major programs and the loss of a program resulted in a decline in fiscal year 2023 compared with 2022 results, partially offset by some new program wins across the portfolio and the ramp of TSA PreCheck.
TSA announced Telos Corporation as TSA's second official TSA PreCheck enrollment and renewal provider in August 2023.
Operating costs were lower, in part, as a result of the restructuring plan announced in the first quarter of 2023.
Lower operating costs resulted in an improvement in profitability and earnings per share.

31

Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Consolidated Results
Table MD&A 2: Consolidated Financial Results Comparison
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(dollars in thousands)
Revenue$145,378 $216,887 
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization)88,892 137,051 
Depreciation and amortization3,544 793 
Total cost of sales92,436 137,844 
Gross profit52,942 79,043 
Gross margin36.4 %36.4 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses93,257 132,893 
Selling, general and administrative expense as percentage of revenue64.1 %61.3 %
Operating loss(40,315)(53,850)
Other income6,715 1,350 
Interest expense(786)(874)
Loss before income taxes(34,386)(53,374)
Provision for income taxes(36)(54)
Net loss$(34,422)$(53,428)
Our mission isbusiness segments have different factors driving revenue fluctuations and profitability. The discussion of the changes in our net revenue and profitability are covered in greater detail under the section that follows: "Segment Results." We generate revenue from the delivery of products and services to protect our customers’ people, systems,customers. Cost of sales, for both products and vital information assets with offeringsservices, consists of labor, materials, subcontracting costs and an allocation of indirect costs.
Selling, general, and administrative ("SG&A"). SG&A expenses decreased by $39.6 million, or 29.8%, in 2023 compared to 2022. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $9.5 million primarily due to lower compensation-related expenses. Research and development expenses decreased by $4.7 million primarily due to lower compensation-related expenses and increased capitalization of software development by $1.9 million. General and administrative expenses also decreased by $25.5 million mostly due to lower compensation-related expenses.
Other income. Other income increased by $5.4 million in 2023, compared to 2022, primarily due to an increase in dividend income from money market placements of $3.9 million, and a gain on early extinguishment of other financing obligation of $1.4 million in 2023, without a similar gain in 2022.
Interest expense. There was no significant change in interest expense between comparable periods.
Provision for cybersecurity, cloud security, and enterprise security. Inincome taxes. There was no significant change in the current global environment, our mission is more critical than ever. provision for income taxes in 2023, compared to 2022.
Segment Results
The emergenceaccounting policies of each new ICT introduces new vulnerabilities,business segment are the same as security is still too often overlookedthose followed by the Company as a whole. Management evaluates business segment performance based on gross profit.
Table MD&A 3: Security Solutions Segment - Financial Results Comparison
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(dollars in thousands)
Revenues$77,416 $120,454 
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization)34,270 57,743 
Depreciation and amortization3,532 763 
Total cost of sales37,802 58,506 
Gross profit$39,614 $61,948 
Gross margin51.2 %51.4 %
32

Table of Contents
Our Security Solutions segment revenue decreased by $43.0 million or 35.7% in solution development. Networks and applications meantfiscal year 2023, compared to enhance productivity and profitability often jeopardize an organizationfiscal year 2022, primarily due to poor planning, misconfiguration, or an unknown gap in security. Ransomware, insider threats, cybercrime,lower revenues on ongoing programs and advanced persistent threats continue to menace publicthe loss of a program, partially offset by some new program wins and private enterprises across all industries.

Cybersecurity, cloud security, and enterprise securitythe initial ramp of the modern organizationTSA PreCheck program.
Likewise, the segment gross profit decreased by $22.3 million or 36.1% in 2023, compared to 2022, primarily due to the decrease in revenue. Segment gross margin slightly decreased from 51.4% in 2022 to 51.2% in 2023 primarily due to higher amortization of software development costs, offset by high margin new program wins, mix within the portfolio and lower stock-based compensation.
Table MD&A 4: Secure Networks Segment - Financial Results Comparison
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(dollars in thousands)
Revenues$67,962 $96,433 
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization)54,622 79,308 
Depreciation and amortization12 30 
Total cost of sales54,634 79,338 
Gross profit$13,328 $17,095 
Gross margin19.6 %17.7 %
Our Secure Networks segment revenue decreased by $28.5 million, or 29.5%, in 2023, compared to 2022, primarily due to the successful completion of certain programs and lower revenues on ongoing programs as expected, partially offset by new program wins.
Segment gross profit decreased by $3.8 million or 22.0% in 2023, compared to 2022, primarily due to lower revenue, partially offset by higher gross margins. Segment gross margin increased from 17.7% in 2022 to 19.6% in 2023 primarily due to strong program and cost management across several key programs.
Key Performance Measures
The primary financial performance measures we use to manage our business and monitor results of operations are revenue, gross profit, and Adjusted EBITDA. We evaluate our results of operations by considering the drivers causing changes in these measures. We evaluate significant trends and fluctuations in our contract portfolio over time due to contract awards and completions, changes in customer requirements and changes in the volume of product and software sales.
Changes in costs of revenue as a percentage of revenue other than from revenue volume or cost mix are driven by changes in compensation expense and other allocated costs and/or cumulative revenue adjustments due to changes in estimates. Changes in operating cash flows are driven by changes in cash generated through delivery of products and services, fluctuations in current assets and liabilities and the impact of changes in the timing of cash receipts or disbursements.
Non-GAAP Measures
In addition to our results determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we believe the non-GAAP financial measures of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, Adjusted EBITDA Margin, Adjusted Net (Loss)/Income, Adjusted Earnings Per Share ("EPS"), Cash Gross Profit, Cash Gross Margin and Free Cash Flow are useful in evaluating our operating performance. We believe that this non-GAAP financial information, when taken collectively with our GAAP results, may be helpful to readers of our financial statements because it provides consistency and comparability with past financial performance and assists in comparisons with other companies, some of which use similar non-GAAP financial information to supplement their GAAP results. The non-GAAP financial information is presented for supplemental informational purposes only, should not be considered a substitute for financial information presented in accordance with GAAP, and may be different from similarly-titled non-GAAP measures used by other companies. A reconciliation is provided below for each of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable financial measure stated in accordance with GAAP.
We believe these non-GAAP financial measures facilitate comparison of our operating performance on a consistent basis between periods by excluding certain items that may, or could, have a disproportionately positive or negative impact on our results of operations in any particular period. When viewed in combination with our results prepared in accordance with GAAP, these non-GAAP financial measures help provide a broader picture of factors and trends affecting our results of operations.
33

Table of Contents
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDA Margin and Adjusted EBITDA Margin
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDA Margin and Adjusted EBITDA Margin are supplemental measures of operating performance that are not made under GAAP and do not represent, and should not be considered as, an alternative to net loss as determined by GAAP. We define EBITDA as net (loss)/income, adjusted for non-operating (income)/expense, interest expense, provision for/(benefit from) income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA, adjusted for stock-based compensation expense and restructuring expenses. We define EBITDA Margin as EBITDA as a percentage of total revenue. We define Adjusted EBITDA Margin as Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of total revenue.
We believe that EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin provide the Board, management and investors with clear representation of our core operating performance and trends, provide greater visibility into the long-term financial performance of the Company, and eliminate the impact of items that do not relate to the ongoing operating performance of the business. Further, Adjusted EBITDA is used by the Board and management to prepare and approve our annual budget, and to evaluate the performance of certain management personnel when determining incentive compensation.
Table MD&A 5: Reconciliation of Net Loss to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
AmountMarginAmountMargin
(dollars in thousands)
Net loss$(34,422)(23.7)%$(53,428)(24.6)%
Other income(6,715)(4.6)%(1,350)(0.6)%
Interest expense786 0.5 %874 0.4 %
Provision for income taxes36 — %54 — %
Depreciation and amortization9,429 6.5 %5,890 2.7 %
EBITDA (Non-GAAP)(30,886)(21.3)%(47,960)(22.1)%
Stock-based compensation expense (1)
24,396 16.8 %64,660 29.8 %
Restructuring expenses (2)
1,132 0.8 %2,767 1.3 %
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)$(5,358)(3.7)%$19,467 9.0 %
(1) The stock-based compensation adjustment to EBITDA is made up of stock-based compensation expense for the awarded service-based restricted stock units ("RSUs"), performance-based restricted stock units ("PSUs"), stock options, and other sources. Stock-based compensation expense for the awarded RSUs, PSUs and stock options was $22.9 million and $62.5 million for fiscal year 2023 and 2022, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense from other sources was $1.5 million and $2.1 million for the fiscal year 2023 and 2022, respectively. The other source of stock-based compensation consists of accrued compensation, which the Company intends to settle in shares of the Company's common stock. However, it is the Company's discretion whether this compensation will ultimately be paid in stock or cash. The Company has the right to dictate the form of these payments up until the date at which they are paid. Any change to the expected payment form would result in a change in estimate that would add back to Adjusted EBITDA.
(2) The restructuring expenses include severance and other related benefit costs (including outplacement services and continuing health insurance coverage), external consulting and advisory fees related to implementing the restructuring plan.
Adjusted Net (Loss)/Income and Adjusted EPS
Adjusted Net (Loss)/Income and Adjusted EPS are supplemental measures of operating performance that are not made under GAAP and do not represent, and should not be considered as, alternatives to net (loss)/income as determined by GAAP. We define Adjusted Net (Loss)/Income as net loss, adjusted for non-operating (income)/expense, stock-based compensation expense and restructuring expense. We define Adjusted EPS as Adjusted Net (Loss)/Income divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Adjusted Net (Loss)/Income and Adjusted EPS provide the Board, management and investors with clear representation of our core operating performance and trends, provide greater visibility into the long-term financial performance of the Company, and eliminate the impact of items that do not relate to the ongoing operating performance of the business.
34

Table of Contents
Table MD&A 6: Reconciliation of Net Loss and GAAP EPS to Non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EPS
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Adjusted Net Income/(Loss)Adjusted Earnings Per ShareAdjusted Net Income/(Loss)Adjusted Earnings Per Share
(in thousands, except per share data)
Net loss$(34,422)$(0.50)$(53,428)$(0.79)
Adjustments:
Other income(6,715)(0.10)(1,350)(0.02)
Stock-based compensation expense (1)
24,396 0.35 64,660 0.96 
Restructuring expenses (2)
1,132 0.02 2,767 0.04 
Adjusted net (loss)/income (Non-GAAP)$(15,609)$(0.23)$12,649 $0.19 
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding, basic69,256 67,559 
(1) The stock-based compensation adjustment to EBITDA is made up of stock-based compensation expense for the awarded service-based restricted stock units ("RSUs"), performance-based restricted stock units ("PSUs"), stock options, and other sources. Stock-based compensation expense for the awarded RSUs, PSUs and stock options was $22.9 million and $62.5 million for fiscal year 2023 and 2022, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense from other sources was $1.5 million and $2.1 million for the fiscal year 2023 and 2022, respectively. The other source of stock-based compensation consists of accrued compensation, which the Company intends to settle in shares of the Company's common stock. However, it is the Company's discretion whether this compensation will ultimately be paid in stock or cash. The Company has the right to dictate the form of these payments up until the date at which they are paid. Any change to the expected payment form would result in a change in estimate that would add back to Adjusted Net (Loss)/Income.
(2) The restructuring expenses include severance and other related benefit costs (including outplacement services and continuing health insurance coverage), external consulting and advisory fees related to implementing the restructuring plan.
Cash Gross Profit and Cash Gross Margin
Cash Gross Profit and Cash Gross Margin are supplemental measures of operating performance that are not made under GAAP and do not represent, and should not be considered as, alternatives to gross profit and gross margin as determined by GAAP. We define Cash Gross Profit as gross profit, plus noncash charges for stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, as well as non-recurring items (such as restructuring expenses) charged under cost of sales. We define Cash Gross Margin as Cash Gross Profit as a percentage of total revenue.
Cash Gross Profit and Cash Gross Margin provide management and investors a clear representation of the core economics of gross profit and gross margin without the impact of non-cash expenses and sunk costs expended.
Table MD&A 6: Reconciliation of Gross Profit to Cash Gross Profit; Gross Margin to Cash Gross Margin
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
AmountMarginAmountMargin
(dollars in thousands)
Gross profit$52,942 36.4 %$79,043 36.4 %
Adjustments:
Stock-based compensation expense — cost of sales900 0.6 %3,497 1.6 %
Depreciation and amortization — cost of sales3,544 2.5 %793 0.4 %
Restructuring expenses — cost of sales— —%578 0.3%
Cash gross profit (Non-GAAP)$57,386 39.5%$83,911 38.7 %
Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow, as reconciled in the table below, is a non-GAAP financial measure defined as net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities, less purchases of property and equipment, and capitalized software development costs. This non-GAAP financial measure may be a useful measure for investors and other users of our financial statements as a supplemental measure of our cash performance and to assess the quality of our earnings as a key performance measure in evaluating management.
We use Free Cash Flow to understand the cash flows that directly correspond with our operations and the investments we must make in those operations, using a methodology that combines operating cash flows and capital expenditures. Further, Free Cash Flow may be useful to management and investors in evaluating the Company's operating performance and liquidity.
35

Table of Contents
Table MD&A 7: Free Cash Flow
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities$1,587 $16,508 
Adjustments:
Purchases of property and equipment(926)(1,009)
Capitalized software development costs(14,552)(12,708)
Net cash proceeds from resale of software— 8,457 
Free cash flow (Non-GAAP)$(13,891)$11,248 
Each of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, Adjusted EBITDA Margin, Adjusted Net (Loss)/Income, Adjusted EPS, Cash Gross Profit, Cash Gross Margin and Free Cash Flow has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider any of them in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Among other limitations, each of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, Adjusted EBITDA Margin, Adjusted Net (Loss)/Income, Adjusted EPS, Cash Gross Profit, Cash Gross Margin and Free Cash Flow does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments, does not reflect the impact of certain cash and non-cash charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations, and does not reflect income tax expense or benefit. Other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin, Adjusted Net (Loss)/Income, Adjusted EPS, Cash Gross Profit, Cash Gross Margin and Free Cash Flow differently than we do, which limits their usefulness as comparative measures. Because of these limitations, neither EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, Adjusted EBITDA Margin, Adjusted Net (Loss)/Income, Adjusted EPS, Cash Gross Profit, Cash Gross Margin nor Free Cash Flow should be considered as a replacement for gross profit, gross margin, net (loss)/income, earnings per share much in common, yet also callor net cash flows (used in)/provided by operating activities, as determined by GAAP, or as a measure of our profitability. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using non-GAAP measures only for supplemental purposes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, future operating cash flows, and if needed, borrowings under our $30.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility, with an expansion feature of up to $30.0 million of additional revolver capacity. While a diverse rangevariety of skills, capabilities,factors related to sources and experience in order to meet theuses of cash, such as timeliness of accounts receivable collections, vendor credit terms, or significant collateral requirements, ultimately impact our liquidity, such factors may or may not have a direct impact on our liquidity.
As of security-conscious customers. DecadesDecember 31, 2023, we had cash and cash equivalents of experience in developing, orchestrating,$99.3 million and delivering solutions across these three domainsour working capital was $100.8 million.
We place a strong emphasis on liquidity management. This focus gives us the visionflexibility for capital deployment while preserving a strong balance sheet to position us for future opportunities. We believe we have adequate funds on hand to execute our financial and operating strategy. Our overall financial position and liquidity are strong. Although no assurances can be given, we believe the available cash balances and access to our revolving credit facility are sufficient to maintain the liquidity we require to meet our operating, investing and financing needs for the next 12 months.
Table MD&A 8: Cash Flows Information
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities$1,587 $16,508 
Net cash used in investing activities(15,478)(13,717)
Net cash used in financing activities(6,151)(9,915)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$(20,042)$(7,124)
Net cash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 was $1.6 million and $16.5 million, respectively, a decrease in cash inflow of $14.9 million compared with prior year. The cash flow from operating activities is primarily driven by the Company's operating losses, the timing of receipts of customer payments, the timing of payments to vendors and employees, and the confidencetiming of inventory turnover, adjusted for certain non-cash items that do not impact cash flows from operating activities.
Net cash used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2023, increased by $1.8 million in cash outflow compared to provide solutions that empowerthe same period in 2022, primarily due to higher investments in software development costs of $14.6 million and protect$12.7 million for the enterprise at an integrated, holistic level. Our experience in addressing challenges in one area of an enterprise helps us meet requirements in others. We understand that a range of complementary capabilities may be needed to solve a single challenge,years ended December 31, 2023 and we also recognize when a single solution might address multiple challenges.

Our security solutions span across the following domains:
Cybersecurity – We help our customers ensure the ongoing security, integrity, and compliance of their on-premises and related cloud-based systems, reducing threats and vulnerabilities in order to foil cyber adversaries before they can attack. Our consultants assess our customers’ security environments and then design, engineer, and operate the systems they need to strengthen their cybersecurity posture.
Cloud Security – The cloud as an organizational resource is more than two decades old, yet the needs of cloud users are constantly changing. We offer the specialized skills and experience needed to help our customers plan, engineer, and execute secure cloud migration strategies and then ensure ongoing management and security in keeping with the leading standards for cloud-based systems and workloads.
Enterprise Security – Securing the enterprise means protecting the essential and timeless elements common to every organization: its people and processes, its supply chain and inventories, its finances and facilities, and its information and communications. As ICT and OT have become part of the organizational make-up, we have offered solutions that ensure personnel can work securely and productively across and beyond the enterprise.

We refer to our cyber and cloud applications as Security Solutions, which includes Information Assurance / Xacta®  (previously referred to as Cyber & Cloud Solutions), Secure Communications (previously referred to as Secure Communications Cyber and Enterprise Solutions), and Telos ID (previously referred to as Telos ID Enterprise Solutions). We refer to our offerings for enterprise security as Secure Networks (previously referred to as Secure Mobility and Network Management/Defense Enterprise Solutions).

2022, respectively.
36
28

Security Solutions
Information Assurance / Xacta: a premier platform for enterprise cyber risk management and security compliance automation, delivering security awareness for systems in the cloud, on-premises, and in hybrid and multi-cloud environments. Xacta delivers automated cyber risk and compliance management solutions to large commercial and government enterprises. Across the U.S. federal government, Xacta is the de facto commercial cyber risk and compliance management solution.
Secure Communications:
Telos Ghost: a virtual obfuscation network-as-a-service with encryption and managed attribution capabilities to ensure the safety and privacy of people, information, and resources on the network. Telos Ghost seeks to eliminate cyber-attack surfaces by obfuscating and encrypting data, masking user identity and location, and hiding network resources. It provides the additional layers of security and privacy needed for intelligence gathering, cyber threat protection, securing critical infrastructure, and protecting communications and applications when operations, property, and even lives can be jeopardized by a single error in security.
Telos Automated Message Handling System (“AMHS”): web-based organizational message distribution and management for mission-critical communications; the recognized gold standard for organizational messaging in the U.S. government. Telos AMHS is used by military field operatives for critical communications on the battlefield and is the only web-based solution for assured messaging and directory services using the DISA Organizational Messaging Service and its specialized communications protocols.
Telos ID: offering Identity Trust and Digital Services through IDTrust360® – an enterprise-class digital identity risk platform for extending SaaS and custom digital identity services that mitigate threats through the integration of advanced technologies that fuse biometrics, credentials, and other identity-centric data used to continuously monitor trust. We maintain government certifications and designations that distinguish Telos ID, including TSA PreCheck® enrollment provider, Designated Aviation Channeling provider, FBI-approved Channeler, and FINRA Electronic Fingerprint Submission provider. We are the only commercial entity in our industry designated as a Secure Flight Services provider for terrorist watchlist checks.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in financing activities was $6.2 million compared to $9.9 million in 2022. The decrease in cash outflow from financing activities is primarily attributable to decreases in payments of tax withholding related to the net share settlement of equity awards of $3.7 million in 2023, compared with $5.7 million in 2022. In addition, the 2023 cash outflow related to the repurchase of common stock under the Share Repurchase Program is comprised only of unpaid purchases in 2022 paid-off in 2023, amounting to $0.1 million, compared with $11.1 million in 2022. This is partially offset by the payments of the DFT holdback of $0.6 million in February 2023. By contrast, in 2022, there was a cash inflow from the other financing obligations of $9.1 million.
Secure Networks
Commitments from Contractual Obligations
The Company does not have any other material cash requirements from contractual obligations at December 31, 2023, except for the commitments on the existing lease obligations on various office space and equipment under non-cancelable operating and finance leases. We reported current and long-term lease liabilities.
Table MD&A 9: Contractual Obligations
Payments due by Period
 Total20242025 - 20272028 - 2030Thereafter
(in thousands)
Finance lease obligations (1)
12,915 2,258 7,116 3,541 — 
Operating lease obligations (1) (2)
241 105 111 25 — 
Total contract obligations$13,156 $2,363 $7,227 $3,566 $— 
(1) Includes interest expense.
$1,688 $536 $1,022 $130 $— 
(2) Includes operating lease right-of-use obligations and short-term leases with terms of 12 months or less. We have various lease agreements pursuant to ASC 842, "Leases" that require us to record the present value of the minimum lease payments for such lease properties.
In addition, there were no outstanding commitments that were considered material for capital expenditures on December 31, 2023.
See Note 19 - Commitment and Contingencies, to the consolidated financial statements within this Annual Report for further discussion of other commitment and contingencies.
Revolving Credit Facility
On December 30, 2022, we entered into a senior secured credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Credit Agreement") that provides for a $30.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility, with the option of issuing letters of credits thereunder and with an uncommitted expansion feature of up to $30.0 million of additional revolver capacity, maturing on December 30, 2025. On April 12, 2023, we amended our Credit Agreement and revised certain provision on the terms of the covered collateral. See Note 10 - Debt and Other Obligations to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report for additional information.
The Credit Agreement contains customary terms and conditions, including certain covenant requirements. As of December 31, 2023, there were no outstanding balances under the revolving credit facility and we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the Credit Agreement.
Other Financing Obligations
In November 2022, we entered into a Master Purchase Agreement with a third-party for $9.1 million relating to software licenses under a specific delivery order with a customer resulting in proceeds from other financing obligation. On February 9, 2023, when the third-party buyer notified us that it would not exercise the option period, we transferred all the rights, title and interest in the underlying licenses in exchange for the extinguishment of the outstanding financing obligations. The extinguishment of the other financing obligations resulted to a gain of $1.4 million. See Note 10 – Debt and Other Obligations to the consolidated financial statements for a detailed discussion of our debt financing arrangements.
Secure Mobility: solutions for business and government that enable remote work and minimize concern across and beyond the enterprise. Our secure mobility team brings credentials to every engagement, supplying deep expertise and experience as well as highly desirable clearances and industry recognized certifications for network engineering, mobility, and security.
Network Management and Defense: services for operating, administrating, and defending complex enterprise networks and defensive cyber operations. Our diverse portfolio of capabilities addresses common and uncommon requirements in many industries and disciplines, ranging from the military and government agencies to Fortune 500 companies.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts reported. In preparing these financial statements, management has made its best estimates and judgments of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date ofcertain amounts included in the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significantgiving due consideration to materiality. Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions usedon an ongoing basis. Our estimates and assumptions have been prepared on the basis of the most current reasonably available information, and may change in the preparationfuture as more current information is available.
37

Table of Contents
Management believes that our critical accounting policies are those that are both material to the presentation of our consolidated financial statements include revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, allowance for inventory obsolescence,condition and results of operations and require management's most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. Typically, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, income taxes, contingenciescircumstances that make these judgments difficult, subjective and litigation, potential impairmentscomplex have to do with making estimates about the effect of goodwill and intangible assets, estimated pension-related costs for our foreign subsidiaries and accretion of public preferred stock.  Actualmatters that are inherently uncertain; as a result, actual results could differ from those estimates.

The following is a summary of the most critical accounting policies used inrequiring estimates, assumptions, and judgments that we believe have the preparation ofmost significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

statements in fiscal year 2023 are described below. This is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all significant accounting policies that are more fully described in the notes to consolidated financial statements contained within this report.
Revenue Recognition
We account forAlthough most of our revenue in accordanceis recognized concurrently with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The unit of account in ASC 606 is a performance obligation, which is a promise in a contract with a customer to transfer a goodbilling or service to the customer. ASC 606 prescribes a five-step model for recognizing revenue that includes identifying the contract with the customer, determining the performance obligation(s), determining the transaction price, allocating the transaction pricepassage of time, some of our revenue requires us to the performance obligation(s), and recognizing revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied. Timingmake estimates. The timing of the satisfaction of performance obligations varies across our businesses due to our diverse product and service mix, customer base, and contractual terms. Significant judgment can be required in determining certain performance obligations, and these determinations could change the amount of revenue and profit recorded in a given period. Our contracts may have a single performance obligation or multiple performance obligations. When there are multiple performance obligations within a contract, we allocate the transaction price, net of any discounts, to each performance obligation based on the standalone selling price of the product or service underlying each performance obligation. The standalone selling price is either based on estimated or actual costs plus a reasonable profit margin or the observable price of a good or service when Telos sells that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers. The transaction price for our contracts represents our best estimate of standalone selling price.the consideration we will receive and includes assumptions regarding variable consideration, as applicable. The transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation within the contract and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied.

29

variable considerations such as claims (i.e., indirect rate or other equitable adjustments) or incentive fees and we include estimated amounts in the transaction price to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. The majorityestimated amounts are based on an assessment of our anticipated performance and all other information that is reasonably available to us.
For contracts where revenue is recognized over time, as control is transferred continuously to our customers who receive and consume benefits as we perform, and is classified as services revenue.  Allrecognize revenue based on progress towards completion of our business groups earn services revenue under a variety of contract types, including time and materials, firm-fixed price, firm-fixed price level of effort, and cost plus fixed fee contract types, which may include variable consideration as discussed further below. Revenue is recognized over timethe performance obligation, using costs incurred to date relative to total estimated costscost at completion to measure progress toward satisfying our performance obligations. Incurred cost represents work performed, which corresponds with, and thereby best depicts, the transfer of control to the customer. Contract costs include labor, material, subcontractor costs and indirect expenses. This continuous transfer of control to the customer is supported by clauses in our contracts with U.S. Government customers whereby the customer may terminate a contract for convenience and then pay for costs incurred plus a profit, at which time the customer would take control of any work in process. For non-U.S. Government contracts where we perform as a subcontractor and our order includes similar Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) provisions as the prime contractor’s order from the U.S. Government, continuous transfer of control is likewise supported by such provisions. For other non-U.S. Government customers, continuous transfer of control to such customers is also supported due to general terms in our contracts and rights to recover damages which would include, among other potential damages, the right to payment for our work performed to date plus a reasonable profit.

Due to the transfer of control over time, revenue is recognized based on progress towards completion of the performance obligation. The selection of the method to measure progress towards completion requires judgment and is based on the nature of the performance obligations. We generally use the cost-to-cost measure of progress on a proportional performance basis for our contracts because it best depicts the transfer of control to the customer which occurs as we incur costs on our contracts. Under the cost-to-cost measure of progress, the extent of progress towards completion is measured based on the ratio of costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs at completion of the performance obligation. Revenues are recorded proportionally as costs are incurred. Due to the nature of the work required to be performed on certain of our performance obligations,contracts, the estimation of total revenue and cost at completion is complex, subject to many variables and requires significant judgment. Contract estimates are based on various assumptions, including labor and subcontractor costs, materials and other direct costs and the complexity of the work to be performed. A significant change in one or more of these estimates could affect the profitability of our contracts. We review and update our contract-related estimates regularly and recognize adjustments in estimated profit on contracts on a cumulative catch-up basis, which may result in an adjustment increasing or decreasing revenue to date on a contract in a particular period that the adjustment is identified. Revenue and profit in future periods of contract performance are recognized using the adjusted estimate.

Revenue that is recognized at a point in time is for the sale of software licenses in our Information Assurance / Xacta® and Secure Communications business groups and for the sale of resold products in Telos ID and Secure Networks, and is classified as product revenue.  Revenue on these contracts is recognized when the customer obtains control of the transferred product or service, which is generally upon delivery of the product to the customer for their use, due to us maintaining control of the product until that point. Orders for the sale of software licenses may contain multiple performance obligations, such as maintenance, training, or consulting services, which are typically delivered over time, consistent with the transfer of control disclosed above for the provision of services. When an order contains multiple performance obligations, we allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations using our best estimate of standalone selling price.

Contracts are routinely and often modified to account for changes in contract requirements, specifications, quantities, or price.  Depending on the nature of the modification, we determine whether to account for the modification as an adjustment to the existing contract or as a new contract.  Generally, modifications are not distinct from the existing contract due to the significant interrelatedness of the performance obligations and are therefore accounted for as an adjustment to the existing contract, and recognized as a cumulative adjustment to revenue (as either an increase or reduction of revenue) based on the modification’s effect on progress toward completion of a performance obligation.

Our contracts may include various types of variable consideration, such as claims (for instance, indirect rate or other equitable adjustments) or incentive fees. We include estimated amounts in the transaction price based on all of the information available to us, including historical information and future estimations, and to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when any uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is resolved.  We have revised and re-submitted several years of incurred cost submissions reflecting certain indirect rate structure changes as a result of regular Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”) audits of incurred cost submissions.  This resulted in signed final rate agreement letters for fiscal years 2011 to 2013 and conformed incurred cost submissions for 2014 to 2015. We evaluated the resulting changes to revenue under the applicable cost plus fixed fee contracts for the years 2011 to 2015 as variable consideration, and determined the most likely amount to which we expect to be entitled, to the extent that no constraint exists that would preclude recognizing this revenue or result in a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized. We included these estimated amounts of variable consideration in the transaction price and as performance on these contracts is complete, we have recognized revenue of $6.0 million during During the year ended December 31, 2018.

Historically, most of our contracts do not include award or incentive fees. For incentive fees, we would include such fees in the transaction price to the extent we could reasonably estimate the amount of the fee.  With limited historical experience, we have not included any2023, there is an immaterial catch-up revenue related to incentive fees in our estimated transaction prices.  We may include in our contract estimates additional revenue for submitted contract modifications or claims against the customer when we believe we have an enforceable right to the modification or claim, the amount can be estimated reliably and its realization is probable. We consider the contractual/legal basis for the claim (in particular FAR provisions), the facts and circumstances around any additional costs incurred, the reasonableness of those costs and the objective evidence available to support such claims.

30

For our contracts that have an original duration of one year or less, we use the practical expedient applicable to such contracts and do not consider the time value of money. We capitalize sales commissions related to proprietary software and related services that are directly tied to sales. We do not elect the practical expedient to expense as incurred the incremental costs of obtaining a contract if the amortization period would have been one year or less. For the sales commissions that are capitalized, we amortize the asset over the expected customer life, which is based on recent and historical data.

Contract assets are amounts that are invoiced as work progresses in accordance with agreed-upon contractual terms, either at periodic intervals or upon achievement of contractual milestones. Generally, revenue recognition occurs before billing, resulting in contract assets. These contract assets are referred to as unbilled receivables and are reported within accounts receivable, net of reserve on our consolidated balance sheets.

Billed receivables are amounts billed and due from our customers and are reported within accounts receivable, net of reserve on the consolidated balance sheets. The portion of the payments retained by the customer until final contract settlement is not considered a significant financing component due to the intent of the retainage being the customer’s protection with respect to full and final performance under the contract.

Contract liabilities are payments received in advance and milestone payments from our customers on selected contracts that exceed revenue earned to date, resulting in contract liabilities. Contract liabilities typically are not considered a significant financing component because they are generally satisfied within one year and are used to meet working capital demands that can be higher in the early stages of a contract. Contract liabilities are reported on our consolidated balance sheets on a net contract basis at the end of each reporting period.

We have one reportable segment. We treat sales to U.S. customers as sales within the U.S. regardless of where the services are performed. Substantially all of our revenues are from U.S. customers as revenue derived from international customers is de minimus. The following tables disclose revenue (in thousands) by customer type and contract type for the periods presented.  Prior period amounts have not been adjusted under the modified retrospective method.

  
2020
  
2019
  
2018
 
 
Federal
 $171,677  $149,257  $129,279 
State & Local, and Commercial  8,240   9,961   8,737 
Total $179,917  $159,218  $138,016 

  
2019
  
2019
  
2018
 
 
Firm fixed-price
 $151,703  $131,629  $103,454 
Time-and-materials  13,455   14,569   16,795 
Cost plus fixed fee  14,759   13,020   17,767 
Total $179,917  $159,218  $138,016 

The following table discloses accounts receivable and contract assets (in thousands):
  December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Billed accounts receivable $12,060  $11,917 
Unbilled receivables  19,161   16,745 
Allowance for doubtful accounts  (308)  (720)
Receivables – net $30,913  $27,942 

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had $127.7 million and $112.4 million of remaining performance obligations, respectively, which we also refer to as funded backlog. We expect to recognize approximately 92.4% of our remaining performance obligations as revenue in 2021, an additional 2.5% by 2022 and the balance thereafter. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the amount of revenue recognized during the year that was included in the opening contract liabilities balance was $5.3 million, $4.2 million, and $5.5 million, respectively. Contract liabilities were $5.7 million and $6.3 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

31

We develop our annual budgeted revenue by estimating for the upcoming year our continuing business from existing customers and active contracts. We consider backlog, both funded and unfunded (as explained below), other expected annual renewals, and expansion planned by our current customers. In the context of our current customer portfolio, we view “recurring revenue” as revenue that occurs often and repeatedly. In each of the last three years, recurring revenue has exceeded 85% of our annual revenue. Our total budgeted revenue is the combination of recurring revenue and a forecast of new business.

Total backlog, a component of recurring revenue, consists of the aggregate contract revenues remaining to be earned by us at a given time over the life of our contracts, whether funded or unfunded. Funded backlog consists of the aggregate contract revenues remaining to be earned at a given time, which, in the case of U.S. government contracts, means that they have been funded by the procuring agency. Unfunded backlog is the difference between total backlog and funded backlog and includes potential revenues that may be earned if customers exercise delivery orders and/or renewal options to continue these contracts. Based on historical experience, we generally assume option year renewals to be exercised. Most of our customers fund contracts on a basis of one year or less and,adjustment as a result funded backlog is generally expected to be earned within one year from any point in time, whereas unfunded backlog is expected to be earned over a longer period.

Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, where cost is determined primarily using the weighted average cost method. Inventories consist primarily of purchased off-the-shelf hardware and software, and component computer parts used in connection with system integration services that we perform. Inventories also include spare parts utilized to support certain maintenance contracts. Spare parts inventory is amortized on a straight-line basis over two to five years, which represents the shorter of the warranty period or estimated useful life of the asset. An allowance for obsolete, slow-moving or non-salable inventory is provided for all other inventory. This allowance is based on our overall obsolescence experiencechanges in contract estimates noted.
Goodwill and our assessment of future inventory requirements.

GoodwillOther Long-Lived Assets
We evaluate the impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets in accordance with ASCAccounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 350, “Intangibles"Intangibles – Goodwill and Other,” which requiresOther." Management annually reviews goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibleother long-lived assets to be assessed on at least an annual basis for impairment using a fair value basis. Between annual evaluations, ifor whenever events occur or changes in circumstances changeindicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If we determine that would more likely than not reduce the faircarrying value of the reporting unit below itsgoodwill and other long-lived assets may not be recoverable, we will record an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount, then impairment must be evaluated. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or business climate, or (2) a loss of key contracts or customers.

As the result of an acquisition, we record any excess purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired as goodwill. An allocationvalue of the purchase price to tangiblegoodwill and intangible netother long-lived assets acquired is based upon our valuation of the acquired assets. exceeds its fair value.
Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to annualrather tested for potential impairment tests. We complete our goodwill impairment tests as of December 31st31 each year. Additionally, we make evaluations betweenThe goodwill impairment test is performed at the reporting unit level. Accounting requirements provide that a reporting entity may perform an optional qualitative assessment on an annual tests ifbasis to determine whether events occuroccurred or circumstances changechanged that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. If an initial qualitative assessment identifies that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, or the optional qualitative assessment is not performed, a quantitative analysis is performed.
In testing goodwill for impairment, we first assess the qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If after the assessment, we determine that an impairment indicator exists, we perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. The evaluation is based onCompany performs the estimationquantitative goodwill impairment test by calculating the fair value of the fair values of our three reporting units, CO&D (comprised of Information Assurance / Xacta and Secure Networks), Telos ID, and Secure Communications, of which goodwill is housed in the CO&D reporting unit in comparisonand comparing it to its respective carrying value including goodwill. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, the amount of impairment expense is equal to the difference between the reporting unit’s net assetunit's fair value and the reporting unit's carrying values. Our discounted cash flows required management’svalue.
38

Table of Contents
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires management's judgment with respect toand involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including forecasted revenue, streams and operating margins, capital expenditures, and the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate.rate commensurate with the risk inherent in each of our reporting units' current business models. We utilizedutilize the weighted average cost of capital as derived by certain assumptions specific to our facts and circumstances as the discount rate. The net assets attributableOur estimate of cash flows and discount rate are subject to change due to the economic environment. A relatively small change in the underlying assumptions, including if the financial performance of the reporting unit does not meet expectations in future years, may cause a change in the results of the impairment assessment in future periods and, as such, could result in goodwill impairment.
For fiscal year 2023, we performed a qualitative assessment on our reporting units areand determined based uponthat it is "more-likely-than-not" that the estimated assets and liabilities attributable to the reporting units in deriving its free cash flows. In addition, the estimate of the total fair value of our Security Solutions reporting units is compared tounit exceeded its carrying value. On the market capitalization of the Company. The Company’s assessment resulted in a fair value that was greater than the Company’s carrying value, therefore the second step of the impairment test, as prescribed by the authoritative literature, was not required to be performed and no impairment of goodwill was recorded as of December 31, 2020. Subsequent reviews may result in future periodic impairments that could have a material adverse effectother hand, based on the resultsinitial qualitative assessment of operations in the period recognized. Recent operating results have reduced the projection of future cash flow growth potential, which indicatesour Secure Networks reporting unit, we concluded that certain negative potential events, such as a material loss or losses on contracts, or failure to achieve projected growth could result in impairment in the future. We estimateit is not "more-likely-than-not" that the fair value of this reporting unit exceeds its carrying value; as such, we performed a quantitative analysis. Based on the quantitative analysis on our Secure Networks reporting unit, its estimated fair value exceeded its carrying value and we concluded that there was no impairment.
Due to the nature of our business and other factors described in Item 1A,"Risk Factors", of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the profitability of our individual reporting units may periodically be affected by downturns in customer demand, operational challenges, and other factors. If material adverse conditions occur that impact one or all of our reporting unitunits, our determination of future fair value might not support the carrying amount of our reporting units, and compare the valuation withrelated goodwill may be impaired. We will continue to monitor any changes to our assumptions and will evaluate goodwill as deemed warranted during future periods.
We amortize intangible assets over their respective estimated useful lives, and review them for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate the respective carrying value may not be recoverable.
Likewise, we evaluated our intangible assets for potential impairment. As a result of the reporting unit to determine whether any goodwill impairment exists. Ifassessment, we determine through the impairment review process that goodwill is impaired, we will recordidentified conditions demonstrating an impairment of certain software development costs. An impairment charge of $0.5 million was recorded in ourthe consolidated statements of operations.operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.
For further discussion of the methods used and factors considered in our estimates as part of the impairment testing for goodwill and intangible assets, see Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies on Goodwill is amortized and deducted over a 15-year period for tax purposes.

Intangible Assets, Note 7 - Goodwill and Note 8 - Intangible Assets, Net to the consolidated financial statements.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Income"Income Taxes.” Under ASC 740," Our income tax expense, deferred tax assets and liabilities, are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences of temporary differences and income tax credits. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured by applying enacted statutoryfor unrecognized tax rates that are applicablebenefits reflect our best estimate of current and future taxes to be paid. We record net deferred assets to the future years in which deferred taxextent we believe these assets or liabilities are expected to be settled or realized for differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Any change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in net income in the period in which the tax rate change is enacted. We record a valuation allowance that reduces deferred tax assets when it is "more likely than not" that deferred tax assets will not be realized. We are required to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Based on available evidence, realizationThe realizability of net deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation ofbased on all available evidence, including future taxable income. We considered projected future taxable income projections, tax planning strategies, and reversal of taxable temporary differences in making this assessment. As such, we have determined that a full valuation allowance is required as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. As a result of a full valuation allowance againstdifferences. We regularly review our deferred tax assets a deferred tax liability related to goodwill remained on our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2020for recoverability and 2019.  Due to the tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, net operating losses generated in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 will have an indefinite carryforward period, which will be available to offset future taxable income created by the reversal of temporary taxable differences related to goodwill. Asestablish a result, we have adjusted the valuation allowance on our deferredwhen management believes it is more likely than not such asset will not be recovered, taking into consideration historical operating results, expectations of future earnings, tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2020 and 2019. See additional information on tax reform and its impact on our income taxes in Note 9 – Income Taxes.

32

Results of Operations
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from contracts and subcontracts with the U.S. Government. Our revenues are generated from a number of contract vehicles and task orders. Over the past several years we have sought to diversify and improve our operating margins through an evolution of our business from an emphasis on product reselling to that of an advanced solutions technologies provider. To that end, although we continue to offer resold products through our contract vehicles, we have focused on selling solutions and outsourcing product sales, as well as designing and delivering Telos manufactured and branded technologies.  We believe our contract portfolio is characterized as having low to moderate financial risk due to the limited number of long-term fixed price development contracts. Our firm fixed-price activities consist principally of contracts for the products and services at established contract prices. Our time-and-material contracts generally allow the pass-through of allowable costs plus a profit margin.  For 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company’s revenue derived from firm fixed-price contracts was 84.3%, 82.7%, and 74.9%, respectively, cost-plus contracts was 8.2%, 8.2%, and 12.9%, respectively, and time-and-material contracts was 7.5%, 9.1%, and 12.2%, respectively.

We provide different solutions and are party to contracts of varying revenue types under the NETCENTS (Network-Centric Solutions) and NETCENTS-2 contracts to the U.S. Air Force. NETCENTS and NETCENTS-2 are IDIQ and GWAC, therefore any government customer may utilize the NETCENTS and NETCENTS-2 vehicles to meet its purchasing needs. Consequently, revenue earned on the underlying NETCENTS and NETCENTS-2 delivery orders varies from period to period according to the customer and solution mix for the products and services delivered during a particular period, unlike a standalone contract with one separately identified customer. The contracts themselves do not fund any orders and they state that the contracts are for an indefinite delivery and indefinite quantity. The majority of our task/delivery orders have periods of performance of less than 12 months, which contributes to the variances between interim and annual reporting periods. We have also been awarded other IDIQ/GWACs, including the Department of Homeland Security’s EAGLE II, GSA Alliant 2, and blanket purchase agreements under our GSA schedule.

We refer to our cyber and cloud applications as Security Solutions, which includes Information Assurance /Xacta® (previously referred to as Cyber & Cloud Solutions), Secure Communications (previously referred to as Secure Communications Cyber and Enterprise Solutions), and Telos ID (previously referred to as Telos ID Enterprise Solutions). We refer to our offerings for enterprise security as Secure Networks (previously referred to as Secure Mobility and Network Management/Defense Enterprise Solutions).

U.S. Government appropriations have been and continue to be affected by larger U.S. Government budgetary issues and related legislation. In 2011, Congress enacted the Budget Control Act of 2011 (the “BCA”), which established specific limits on annual appropriations for fiscal years 2012-2021. These limits were subsequently amended several times. With the expiration of the BCA at the end of FY 2021, there are no statutory limits in place for FY 2022.

According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), since enactment of the BCA, federal outlays devoted to defense programs fell from 4.5 percent as a share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to as low as 3.1 percent of GDP in each of FYs 2016-18, before rising slightly the past two years to a level of 3.4 percent in FY 2020. Moreover, CBO reports that, as a result of the spending caps imposed by the BCA, non-adjusted defense outlays subsequently shrank from $699.4 billion in FY 2011 to as low as $583.4 billion in FY 2016, and did not again exceed their FY 2011 level until FY 2020, when outlays were $713.8 billion, two percent above the FY 2011 level.

In Fiscal Years 2020 and 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic dislocation in the United States has resulted in an overwhelming federal response, including enactment of several massive and comprehensive emergency appropriations and economic stimulus measures. These were in addition to annual appropriations legislation for FY 2021, which was not enacted into law until late December, 2020, nearly three months after the beginning of the fiscal year, during which time the government once again operated under a series of Continuing Resolutions which strictly limited new spending initiatives. These enormous emergency spending packages and their resulting increases in the budget deficit will necessarily factor into future spending decisions to an unknown degree. Further, as the outgoing Trump Administration did not complete its work on a proposed FY 2022 budget prior to leaving office on January 20, 2021,planning strategies and the incoming Biden Administration has been delayed in submitting a proposed budget to Congress, the proposed spending levels for FY 2022 cannot be predicted.  Finally, the near- and long-term impacts of the COVID-19 health and associated economic crisis on federal budget planning and the government contracts that we hold, and on the federal procurements that we would otherwise compete for, cannot be known.

Should Congress and the White House be unable to make sufficient progress on the FY 2022 budget and enact appropriations legislation prior to the beginning of the new fiscal year on October 1, 2021, the Department of Defense and other federal departments and agencies will likely again be funded for an unknown period of time under a Continuing Resolution, which would restrict new spending initiatives.

Despite the pandemic’s resultant shift to teleworking by federal employees and contractors, the government has successfully maintained continuity of services as has Telos Corporation.  With much of the business of government continuing to be conducted remotely through use of information technology systems, we believe there will continue to be a need on the part of the government for the types of solutions and services provided by Telos.

For more information on the risks and uncertainties related to U.S. Government contracts, see Part I – Item 1A Risk Factors in this Annual Report on the Form 10-K.

33

Statement of Operations Data

The following table sets forth certain consolidated financial data and related percentages for the periods indicated:

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019  2018 
  (dollar amounts in thousands) 
                   
Revenue $179,917   100.0% $159,218   100.0% $138,016   100.0%
Cost of sales  117,497   65.3   106,874   67.1   84,954   61.6 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  62,123   34.5   47,319   29.7   44,048   31.9 
Operating income  297   0.2   5,025   3.2   9,014   6.5 
Other income (expenses):                        
Gain on redemption of public preferred stock  14,012   7.8   ----   ----   ----   ---- 
Non-operating (expense) income  (255)  (0.2)  201   0.1   12   ---- 
 Interest expense  (7,259)  (4.0)  (7,467)  (4.7)  (7,258)  (5.2)
Income (loss) income before income taxes  6,795   3.8   (2,241)  (1.4)  1,768   1.3 
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes  46   ----   104   0.1   (31)  ---- 
Net income (loss)  6,841   3.8   (2,137)  (1.3)  1,737   1.3 
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interest  (5,154)  (2.9)  (4,264)  (2.7)  (3,377)  (2.4)
Net income (loss) attributable to Telos Corporation $1,687   0.9% $(6,401)  (4.0)% $(1,640)  (1.1)%

Years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018

Revenue.  Revenue increased by 13.0% to $179.9 million for 2020 from $159.2 million for 2019.  Security Solutions revenue was $117.3 million and $101.9 million for 2020 and 2019, respectively. This increase in 2020 of approximately 15% was driven primarily by an increase of $8.1 million in sales of offerings in Telos ID on the contract with the U.S. Census Bureau and $7.3 million in sales of offerings related to the contract with a U.S. government agency for our Telos Ghost managed intelligence support solution in Secure Communications. Secure Networks revenue was $62.6 million and $57.3 million for 2020 and 2019, respectively. This increase in 2020 of approximately 9% resulted from various DoD contracts, in both our Secure Mobility and Network Management/Defense Enterprise Solutions offerings. Due to the various solutions offerings and within the business groups, sales may vary from period to period according to the solution mix and timing of deliverables for a particular period.

Revenue increased by 15.4% to $159.2 million for 2019 from $138.0 million for 2018.  Such increase primarily consists of an increase in sales from the U.S. Air Force NETCENTS-2 contract. As discussed above, NETCENTS-2 is an IDIQ contract utilized by multiple government customers and sales under NETCENTS-2 vary from period to period according to the solution mix and timing of deliverables for a particular period. Security Solutions revenue was $101.9 million and $86.6 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively. This increase in 2019 of approximately 18% is primarily attributable to a $10.1 million increase in sales of offerings in Telos ID on a contract with the U.S. Census Bureau and a $6.3 million increase in sales of offerings related to a contract with a U.S. government agency for our Telos Ghost managed intelligence support solution in Secure Communications. Secure Networks revenue was $57.3 million in 2019 and $51.4 million in 2018. The sales increase in 2019 is the result of various DoD contracts around our Secure Mobility as well as our Network Management and Defense offerings.

Cost of sales.  Cost of sales increased by 9.9% to $117.5 million for 2020 from $106.9 million for 2019 as a result of increases in revenue. Cost of sales for Security Solutions increased to $66.9 million in 2020 from $59.9 million in 2019 which translates as a decrease in the cost of sales as a percentage of revenue to 57.0% from 58.7%. due to a change in the mix and nature of the programs. Cost of sales for Secure Networks increased to $50.6 million in 2020 from $47.0 million in 2019 which translates as a decrease in the cost of sales as a percentage of revenue to 80.9% from 82.0%.

Cost of sales increased by 25.8% to $106.9 million for 2019 from $85.0 million for 2018 as a result of increases in revenue. Cost of sales for Security Solutions increased to $59.9 million in 2019 from $48.2 million in 2018 which translates as a increase in the cost of sales as a percentage of revenue to 58.7% from 55.7%. due to a change in the mix and nature of the programs. Cost of sales for Secure Networks increased to $47.0 million in 2019 from $36.7 million in 2018 which translates as an increase in the cost of sales as a percentage of revenue to 82.0% from 71.5% due primarily to the effect of revenue accruals in 2018 for multiple contracts as a result of several years of cumulative indirect rate adjustments, which did not include direct costs.

34

Gross profit.  Gross profit increased by 19.2% to $62.4 million for 2020 from $52.3 million for 2019. Gross profit for Security Solutions increased to $50.5 million in 2020 from $42.1 million in 2019. Gross profit for Secure Networks increased to $12.0 million in 2020 from $10.3 million in 2019. Gross margin increased to 34.7% for 2020 from 32.9% for 2019, due to various changes in the mix of contracts in all business lines as discussed above. Gross margin for Security Solutions increased to 43.0% in 2020 from 41.3% in 2019. Gross margin for Secure Networks increased to 19.1% in 2020 from 18% in 2019.

Gross profit decreased by 1.4% to $52.3 million for 2019 from $53.1 million for 2018. Gross profit for Security Solutions increased to $42.1 million in 2019 from $38.4 million in 2018. Gross profit for Secure Networks decreased to $10.3 million in 2019 from $14.6 million in 2018, due primarily to the effect of revenue accruals in 2018 for multiple contracts as a result of several years of cumulative indirect rate adjustments, which did not include direct costs. Gross margin decreased to 32.9% for 2019 from 38.4% for 2018, due to various changes in the mix of contracts in all business lines, primarily decreases in proprietary software sales. Gross margin for Security Solutions decreased to 41.3% in 2019 from 44.3% in 2018. Gross margin for Secure Networks decreased to 18% in 2019 from 28.5% in 2018.

Selling, general, and administrative expenses.  Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased by 31.3% to $62.1 million for 2020 from $47.3 million for 2019. Such increase is primarily attributable to increases in bonuses of $6.3 million, outside services of $5.9 million, labor costs of $5.9 million, and $0.6 million in legal fees, offset by capitalization of research and development costs of $4.2 million.

Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased by 7.4% to $47.3 million for 2019 from $44.0 million for 2018. Such increase is primarily attributable to increases in labor costs of $1.9 million, bonuses of $0.5 million, bad debt expenses of $0.5 million, and outside services of $0.4 million.

Interest expense.  Interest expense decreased by 2.8% to $7.3 million for 2020 from $7.5 million for 2019, primarily due to decreases in public preferred stock interest as a result of such stock redemption, and interest on an equipment purchase arrangement, offset by an increase in interest on the senior term loan with EnCap (as defined below).

Interest expense increased by 2.9% to $7.5 million for 2019 from $7.3 million for 2018, primarily due to an increase in interest on the EnCap senior term loan, offset by a decrease in interest on an equipment purchase arrangement.

Components of interest expense are as follows:
  December 31, 
  
2020
  
2019
  
2018
 
  (amounts in thousands) 
Commercial and subordinated note interest incurred $3,875  $3,644  $3,436 
Preferred stock interest accrued  3,384   3,823   3,822 
Total $7,259  $7,467  $7,258 

Provision for income taxes.  Income tax benefit was $46,000 for 2020, compared to an income tax provision of $104,000 for 2019, primarily attributable to administrative practice release of certain FIN48 liability.

Income tax benefit was $104,000 for 2019, compared to an income tax provision of $31,000 for 2018, primarily attributable to the decrease in deferred tax liability due to theexpected timing of the state conformity to the indefinite-lived net operating loss provisionreversals of the Tax Act (as described below).existing temporary differences.

35

Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to our results determined in accordance with GAAP, we believe the non-GAAP financial measures of Non-GAAP Operating Income, Enterprise EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are useful in evaluating our operating performance. We believe that this non-GAAP financial information, when taken collectively with our GAAP results, may be helpful to readers of our financial statements because it provides consistency and comparability with past financial performance and assists in comparisons with other companies, some of which use similar non-GAAP financial information to supplement their GAAP results. The non-GAAP financial information is presented for supplemental informational purposes only, should not be considered a substitute for financial information presented in accordance with GAAP, and may be different from similarly-titled non-GAAP measures used by other companies. A reconciliation is provided below for each of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable financial measure stated in accordance with GAAP.

We use the following non-GAAP financial measures to understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends, to prepare and approve our annual budget, to develop short-term and long-term operating plans, and to evaluate the performance of certain management personnel when determining incentive compensation. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures facilitate comparison of our operating performance on a consistent basis between periods by excluding certain items that may, or could, have a disproportionate positive or negative impact on our results of operations in any particular period. When viewed in combination with our results prepared in accordance with GAAP, these non-GAAP financial measures help provide a broader picture of factors and trends affecting our results of operations.

Enterprise EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
Both Enterprise EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are supplemental measures of operating performance that are not made under GAAP and that does not represent, and should not be considered as, an alternative to net income (loss) as determined by GAAP. We define Enterprise EBITDA as net income (loss) attributable to Telos Corporation, adjusted for net income attributable to non-controlling interest, non-operating income, interest expense, (benefit) provision for income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as Enterprise EBITDA, adjusted for stock-based compensation expense, the gain realized on redemption of the public preferred stock upon the closing of our initial public offering, the losses realized on the extinguishment of senior term loan and subordinated debt upon the closing of our initial public offering, bonuses paid as a result of the closing of our initial public offering, and other expenses related to our initial public offering.

36

A reconciliation of Enterprise EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss) attributable to Telos Corporation, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, is as follows:

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019  2018 
  (amount in thousands) 
Net income (loss) attributable to Telos Corporation $1,687  $(6,401) $(1,640)
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest  5,154   4,264   3,377 
Non-operating income  (20)  (201)  (12)
Interest expense  7,259   7,467   7,258 
(Benefit) provision for income taxes  (46)  (104)  31 
Depreciation and amortization  5,353   4,972   3,028 
Enterprise EBITDA  19,387   9,997   12,042 
Transaction related gains/losses/expenses:            
Transaction related legal and accounting  1,914   ----   ---- 
Transaction related bonus  3,816   ----   ---- 
Gain on redemption of public preferred stock  (14,012)  ----   ---- 
Transaction related non-operating income  (274)  ----   ---- 
Loss on extinguishment of senior term loan  138   ----   ---- 
Loss on extinguishment of subordinated debt  411   ----   ---- 
Stock-based compensation expense  ----   ----   ---- 
Total transaction related gains/losses/expenses  (8,007)  ----   ---- 
Stock-based compensation expense  4   ----   ---- 
Adjusted EBITDA $11,384  $9,997  $12,042 

Each of Enterprise EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Among other limitations, each of Enterprise EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments, does not reflect the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations, and does not reflect income tax expense or benefit. Other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, which limits its usefulness as a comparative measure. Because of these limitations, neither Enterprise EBITDA nor Adjusted EBITDA should be considered as a replacement for net income (loss), as determined by GAAP, or as a measure of our profitability. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using non-GAAP measures only for supplemental purposes.
37

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Upon the closing of our initial public offering, we issued 17.2 million shares of our common stock at a price of $17.00 per share, generating net proceeds of approximately $272.8 million. We used approximately $108.9 million of the net proceeds in connection with the ERPS Conversion (see Note 7 – Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock Conversion), $30.0 million to fund our acquisition of the outstanding Class B Units of Telos ID (see Note 2 – Purchase of Telos ID/Non-controlling Interests), $21.0 million to repay our outstanding senior term loan and subordinated debt (see Note 6 – Debt Obligations).  We intend to use the remaining net proceeds for general corporate purposes. We also may use a portion of the net proceeds to acquire complementary businesses, products, services, or technologies. However, we do not have agreements, commitments, or plans for any specific acquisitions at this time. The amounts and timing of our actual use of the net proceeds will vary depending on numerous factors. Proceeds held by us are invested in short-term investments until needed for the uses described above. We currently anticipate that we will retain all available funds for use in the operation and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Our working capital was $105.2 million and $2.9 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Although no assurances can be given, we expect that funds generated from operations are sufficient to maintain the liquidity we require to meet our operating, investing and financing needs for the next 12 months.

Cash used in operating activities was $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to cash provided by operating activities of $11.8 million and $6.3 million, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Cash provided by operating activities is primarily driven by our operating income, the timing of receipt of customer payments, the timing of payments to vendors and employees, and the timing of inventory turnover, adjusted for certain non-cash items that do not impact cash flows from operating activities.  Additionally, cash used in operating activities also includes dividends from preferred stock recorded as interest expense of $3.4 million, $3.8 million, and $3.8 million for 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. In 2020, net income was $6.8 million, $14.0 million of gain related to the redemption of public preferred stock, and $5.4 million of depreciation and amortization, $1.7 million of which was amortization of capitalized software development costs. In 2019, net loss was $2.1 million, which included $5.0 million of depreciation and amortization, $1.8 million of which was amortization of capitalized software development costs. In 2018, net income was $1.7 million, which included $3.0 million of depreciation and amortization, $1.1 million of which was amortization of capitalized software development costs.
Cash used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 was $7.5 million, $6.5 million, and $4.1 million, respectively, which, for the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, consisted of the capitalization of software development costs of $6.7 million, $2.4 million and $1.6 million, respectively, and the purchases of property and equipment of $0.8 million, $4.1 million and $2.5 million, respectively.
Cash provided by financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $108.9 million and $1.4 million, respectively, compared to cash used in financing activities $2.7 million for 2018. The financing activities in 2020 consisted of net proceeds of $272.8 million from the initial public offering, offset by $108.9 million redemption of the public preferred stock, $17.4 million payoff of senior term loan, $30.0 million purchase of Telos ID membership interest, distributions of $2.7 million to the Class B Member of Telos ID, $3.7 million payoff of subordinated debt, and repayments of $1.2 million under finance leases. The financing activities in 2019 consisted of net proceeds of $4.9 million from the EnCap senior term loan, distributions of $2.4 million to the Class B Member of Telos ID, and repayments of $1.1 million under finance leases. The financing activities in 2018 consisted of distributions of $1.7 million to the Class B Member of Telos ID and repayments of $1.0 million under finance leases.

38

Contractual Obligations

The following summarizes our contractual obligations and our redeemable preferred stock at December 31, 2020 (in thousands):

    Payments due by Period 
  
Total
  
2021
   2022 - 2024   2025 - 2027  2028 and later 
                  
Finance lease obligations (1) $19,364  $2,097  $6,609  $7,117  $3,541 
Operating lease obligations (2)  1,744   752   992   ----   ---- 
  $21,108  $2,849  $7,601  $7,117  $3,541 
 
 (1)    Includes interest expense:
 $3,724  $758  $1 ,826  $1,009  $131 
 (2)    Includes operating lease right-of-use obligations and short-term leases with terms of 12 months or less.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements (as defined in Item 303, paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K) that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, sales or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures for property and equipment were $0.8 million, $4.1 million, and $2.5 million for 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. We presently anticipate capital expenditures of approximately $5.2 million in 2021; however, there can be no assurance that this level of capital expenditures will occur. We believe that available cash and borrowings under the Purchase Agreement will be sufficient to generate adequate amounts of cash to fund our projected capital expenditures for 2021.

Leases and Related Obligations
We have various lease agreements for property and equipment that, pursuant to ASC 840, “Leases,” require us to record the present value of the minimum lease payments for such equipment and property as an asset in our consolidated financial statements. Such assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease or their useful life, whichever is shorter.

We adopted ASU 2016-02 effective January 1, 2019 and recorded right-of-use assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets and expanded disclosures about leasing arrangements, among other items, for most lease arrangements.

Inflation
The rate of inflation has been moderate over the past five years and, accordingly, has not had a significant impact on the Company. We have generally been able to pass through any increased costs to customers through higher prices to the extent permitted by competitive pressures.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 – Summary of2 - Significant Accounting Policies of the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
None.In the normal course of business, we are exposed to a variety of financial risks such as interest rate risk, foreign currency translation risk, and counterparty risk, which can affect our operations and profitability.


Our cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments that have a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase, and would not be significantly affected by increases or decreases in interest rates mainly due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The majority of our business is transacted in U.S. dollars, and the impact of the foreign currency fluctuation as we report for our foreign subsidiary upon translation of its financials into U.S. dollars was insignificant. Further, we do not enter into financial instruments for trading purposes.
39
39

Table of Contents
Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


TELOS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Page
41
42
43
44 - 45
46 - 47
48
49 - 71
40


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Shareholders andTo the Board of Directors
and Stockholders of Telos Corporation
Ashburn, Virginia
OpinionOpinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Telos Corporation (the “Company”) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2020 2023and 2019,2022, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss)/income, (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity equity/(deficit), and cash flows for each of the threetwo years in the period endedDecember 31, 2020, and2023, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”).We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and subsidiaries atas of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the threetwo years in the period ended December 31, 2020,2023in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the COSO.
Basis for OpinionOpinions
TheseThe Company's management is responsible for these consolidatedfinancial statements, are the responsibilityfor maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the Company’s management.effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinionopinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding offraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectivenesswas maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the Company’s internal control overconsolidated financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our auditsstatements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
/s/ BDO USA, LLP

We have served asBecause of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the Company's auditor since 2007.
McLean, Virginia
March 25, 2021

risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
40
41

TELOS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(amounts in thousands, except earnings per share data)

 Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019  2018 
Revenue (Note 5)         
Services $161,180  $143,581  $120,990 
Products  18,737   15,637   17,026 
   179,917   159,218   138,016 
Costs and expenses            
Cost of sales – Services  106,969   98,772   76,857 
Cost of sales – Products  10,528   8,102   8,097 
   117,497   106,874   84,954 
Selling, general and administrative expenses            
     Sales and marketing  6,176   5,951   6,014 
     Research and development  14,243   10,647   8,755 
     General and administrative  41,704   30,721   29,279 
   62,123   47,319   44,048 
Operating income  297   5,025   9,014 
Other income (expenses)            
Gain on redemption of public preferred stock (Note 7)  14,012       
Non-operating (expense) income  (255)  201   12 
Interest expense  (7,259)  (7,467)  (7,258)
Income (loss) before income taxes  6,795   (2,241)  1,768 
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes (Note 9)  46   104   (31)
             
Net income (loss)  6,841   (2,137)  1,737 
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interest (Note 2)  (5,154)  (4,264)  (3,377)
Net income (loss) attributable to Telos Corporation $1,687  $(6,401) $(1,640)
Net  earnings (loss) per share attributable to Telos Corporation, basic $0.04  $(0.17) $(0.04)
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to Telos Corporation, diluted $0.04  $(0.17) $(0.04)
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding, basic  41,642   37,729   36,762 
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding, diluted  42,877   37,729   36,762 

Critical Audit Matters
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
42


TELOS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
 (amounts in thousands)

 Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019  2018 
Net income (loss) $6,841  $(2,137) $1,737 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:            
Foreign currency translation adjustments  38   (11)  (15)
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest  (5,154)  (4,264)  (3,377)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Telos Corporation $1,725  $(6,412) $(1,655)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
43


TELOS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(amounts in thousands)

ASSETS

 December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Current assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $106,045  $6,751 
Accounts receivable, net of reserve of $308 and $720, respectively (Note 5)
  30,913   27,942 
Inventories, net of obsolescence reserve of $851 and $860, respectively (Note 1)
  3,311   1,965 
Prepaid expenses  3,059   1,717 
Deferred program expenses  5   673 
Other current assets  781   1,197 
Total current assets  144,114   40,245 
Property and equipment (Note 1)        
Furniture, equipment, and capitalized software development costs  25,827   18,709 
Leasehold improvements  2,669   2,536 
Property and equipment under finance leases  30,792   30,792 
   59,288   52,037 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (36,891)  (32,470)
   22,397   19,567 
Operating lease right-of-use assets  1,464   1,979 
Goodwill (Note 3)  14,916   14,916 
Other assets  926   985 
Total assets $183,817  $77,692 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

44


TELOS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(amounts in thousands, except share data)

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

 December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Current liabilities      
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities (Note 6) $20,899  $15,050 
Accrued compensation and benefits  8,474   12,187 
Contract liabilities (Notes 1 and 6)  5,654   6,337 
Finance lease obligations – short-term (Note 10)  1,339   1,224 
Operating lease obligations – short-term (Note 10)  677   602 
Other current liabilities  1,903   1,903 
Total current liabilities  38,946   37,303 
         
Senior term loan, net of unamortized discount and issuance costs (Note 6)     16,335 
Subordinated debt (Note 6)     2,927 
Finance lease obligations - long-term (Note 10)  14,301   15,641 
Operating lease obligations - long-term (Note 10)  941   1,553 
Deferred income taxes (Note 9)  652   621 
Public preferred stock (Note 7)     139,210 
Other liabilities (Note 9)  1,873   724 
Total liabilities  56,713   214,314 
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 10 and 13)        
         
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) (Note 8)        
Telos stockholders’ equity (deficit)        
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 64,625,071 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020
  103    
Class A common stock, no par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 35,826,200 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019
     65 
Class B common stock, no par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 3,204,293 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019
     13 
Additional paid-in capital  270,800   4,310 
Accumulated other comprehensive income  44   6 
Accumulated deficit  (143,843)  (145,530)
Total Telos stockholders’ equity (deficit)  127,104   (141,136)
Non-controlling interest in subsidiary (Note 2)     4,514 
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)  127,104   (136,622)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit) $183,817  $77,692 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
45


TELOS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(amounts in thousands)

 Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019  2018 
Operating activities:         
Net income (loss) $6,841  $(2,137) $1,737 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash (used in) provided by operating activities:            
Gain on redemption of public preferred stock  (14,012)      
Net loss on early extinguishment of debt and other transactions
  275       
Stock-based compensation  4       
Dividends from preferred stock recorded as interest expense  3,384   3,823   3,822 
Depreciation and amortization  5,353   4,972   3,028 
Provision for inventory obsolescence  (1)  376   30 
(Benefit) provision for doubtful accounts receivable  (412)  414   (105)
Provision for doubtful non-trade receivables  569       
Amortization of debt issuance costs  978   461   198 
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)  31   (197)  77 
Loss on disposal of fixed assets  1   15   3 
Changes in assets and liabilities:            
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable  (2,559)  6,186   (9,917)
(Increase) decrease in inventories  (1,345)  2,048   9,101 
 Decrease (increase) in deferred program expenses  668   (429)  1,828 
 Increase in prepaid expenses, other current assets and other assets  (1,606)  (3,576)  (465)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other accrued payables  3,413   (6,730)  (3,914)
(Decrease) increase in accrued compensation and benefits  (3,713)  3,105   1,626 
(Decrease) increase in contract liabilities  (683)  1,106   (960)
 Increase in other current liabilities and other liabilities  710   2,379   179 
Cash (used in) provided by operating activities  (2,104)  11,816   6,268 
Investing activities:            
Capitalized software development costs  (6,681)  (2,442)  (1,649)
Purchases of property and equipment  (780)  (4,090)  (2,465)
Cash used in investing activities  (7,461)  (6,532)  (4,114)
Financing activities:            
Proceeds from initial public offering  272,813       
Redemption of public preferred stock  (108,878)      
Purchase of Telos ID membership interest  (30,000)      
Payment of senior term loan  (17,351)      
Payment of subordinated debt  (3,657)      
Proceeds from senior term loan     4,881    
Payments under finance lease obligations  (1,225)  (1,115)  (1,013)
Amendment fee paid to lender  (100)      
Distributions to Telos ID Class B member – non-controlling interest  (2,743)  (2,371)  (1,669)
Cash  provided by (used in) financing activities  108,859   1,395   (2,682)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  99,294   6,679   (528)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year  6,751   72   600 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $106,045  $6,751  $72 

46

             
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:            
Cash paid during the year for:            
Interest $7,259  $3,299   2,483 
Income taxes $64  $40  $19 
             
Noncash:            
Dividends from preferred stock recorded as interest expense $3,384  $3,823  $3,822 
Common stock issued on redemption of public preferred stock (Note 7) $19,213  $  $ 
Common stock issued on purchase of Telos ID membership interest (Note 2) $148,399  $  $ 
Distributions to Telos ID Class B member – non-controlling interest $2,436  $  $ 
Debt issuance costs and prepayment of interest on senior term loan $  $119  $ 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
47


TELOS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(amounts in thousands)

 Common Stock  
Class A Common
Stock
  
Class B
Common
Stock
  
Additional
Paid–in Capital
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Income
  
Accumulated
Deficit
  
Non-Controlling Interest
  
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
(Deficit)
 
Balance December 31, 2017 $  $65  $13  $4,310  $32  $(141,370) $913  $(136,037)
Net (loss) income                 (1,640)  3,377   1,737 
Cumulative effect adjustment due to change in accounting policy                 3,881      3,881 
Foreign currency translation loss              (15)        (15)
Distributions                    (1,669)  (1,669)
Balance December 31, 2018 $  $65  $13  $4,310  $17  $(139,129) $2,621   (132,103)
Net (loss) income                 (6,401)  4,264   (2,137)
Foreign currency translation loss              (11)        (11)
Distributions                    (2,371)  (2,371)
Balance December 31, 2019 $  $65  $13  $4,310  $6  $(145,530) 
$
4,514
  $(136,622)
Net income  
   
            1,687   5,154   6,841 
Issuance of common stock  103   (65)  (13)  291,997            292,022 
Purchase of Telos ID membership interest           (25,511)        (4,489)  (30,000)
Foreign currency translation gain              38         38 
Stock-based compensation           4            4 
Distributions                    (5,179)  (5,179)
Balance December 31, 2020 $103  $  $  
$
270,800
  $44  $(143,843) 
$
  $127,104 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
48


TELOS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business and Organization
Telos Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, (the “Company” or “Telos” or “We”),critical audit matter communicated below is an information technology solutions and services company addressinga matter arising from the needs of U.S. Government and commercial customers worldwide. We own all of the issued and outstanding share capital of Xacta Corporation, a subsidiary that develops, markets and sells government-validated secure enterprise solutions to government and commercial customers. We also own all of the issued and outstanding share capital of Ubiquity.com, Inc., a holding company for Xacta Corporation. We also have a 100% ownership interest in Telos Identity Management Solutions, LLC (“Telos ID”), Teloworks, Inc. (“Teloworks”) and Telos APAC Pte. Ltd. (Telos APAC).

Initial Public Offering of Common Stock
On November 19, 2020, we completed our initial public offering of shares of our common stock. We issued 17.2 million shares of our common stock at a price of $17.00 per share, generating net proceeds of approximately $272.8 million.  We used approximately $108.9 million of the net proceeds in connection with the conversion of our outstanding shares of Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock into the right to receive cash and shares of our common stock, $30.0 million to fund our acquisition of the outstanding Class B Units of Telos ID, and $21.0 million to repay our outstanding senior term loan and subordinated debt.  We intend to use the remaining net proceeds for general corporate purposes. We also may use a portion of the net proceeds to acquire complementary businesses, products, services, or technologies. We do not, however, have agreements, commitments, or plans for any specific acquisitions at this time. The amounts and timing of our actual use of the net proceeds will vary depending on numerous factors.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Telos and its subsidiaries, including Ubiquity.com, Inc., Xacta Corporation, Telos ID, Teloworks, and Telos APAC, all of whose issued and outstanding share capital is owned by the Company. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

In December 2019, an outbreak of COVID-19 was reported in Wuhan, China. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic and on March 13, 2020, President Donald J. Trump declared the virus a national emergency. This highly contagious disease has spread to most of the countries in the world and throughout the United States, creating a serious impact on customers, workforces, and suppliers, disrupting economies and financial markets, and leading to a world-wide economic downturn. COVID-19, together with subsequently reported variants of this strain, have caused a disruption of the normal operations of many businesses, including the temporary closure or scale-back of business operations and/or the imposition of either quarantine or remote work or meeting requirements for employees, either by government order or on a voluntary basis. The pandemic may adversely affect our customers’ ability to perform their missions and is in many cases disrupting their operations. It may also impact the ability of our subcontractors, partners, and suppliers to operate and fulfill their contractual obligations, and result in an increase in their costs and cause delays in performance. These supply chain effects, and the direct effect of the virus and the disruption on our operations, may negatively impact both our ability to meet customer demand and our revenue and profit margins. Our employees, in some cases, are working remotely due either to safety concerns or to customer imposed limitations and using various technologies to perform their functions. We could see delays or changes in customer demand, particularly if government funding priorities change. Additionally, the disruption and volatility in the global and domestic capital markets may increase the cost of capital and limit our ability to access capital. Both the health and economic aspects of COVID-19 are highly fluid and the future course of each is uncertain.

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, we have evaluated subsequent events through the date that these consolidated financial statements were issued.

Segment Reporting
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. We currently operate in one operating and reportable business segment for financial reporting purposes. Our Chief Executive Officer is the CODM. The CODM only evaluates profitability based on consolidated results.

Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the datecurrent period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements include revenue recognition, allowance for doubtfuland (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts receivable, allowance for inventory obsolescence, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, income taxes, contingencies and litigation, potential impairments of goodwill and estimated pension-related costs for our foreign subsidiaries.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.or disclosures to which it relates.

49

Revenue Recognition – Estimated Costs to Complete Long-term Contracts
We account for revenueAs discussed in accordance with ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The unit of account in ASC 606 is a performance obligation, which is a promise in a contract with a customer to transfer a good or serviceNote 3 to the customer. ASC 606 prescribesconsolidated financial statements, a five-step model for recognizing revenue that includes identifying the contract with the customer, determining the performance obligation(s), determining the transaction price, allocating the transaction price to the performance obligation(s), and recognizing revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied. Timingportion of the satisfactionCompany’s revenues of performance obligations varies across our businesses$145.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 were generated from long-term contracts. For the Company’s long-term contracts, due to our diverse product and service mix, customer base, and contractual terms. Significant judgment can be required in determining certain performance obligations, and these determinations could change the amount of revenue and profit recorded in a given period.  Our contracts may have a single performance obligation or multiple performance obligations. When there are multiple performance obligations within a contract, we allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation based on our best estimate of standalone selling price.

The majority of our revenue is recognized over time, as control is transferred continuously to our customers who receive and consume benefits as we perform, and is classified as services revenue.  All of our business groups earn services revenue under a variety of contract types, including time and materials, firm-fixed price, firm fixed price level of effort, and cost plus fixed fee contract types, which may include variable consideration as discussed further below. Revenue is recognized over time using costs incurred to date relative to total estimated costs at completion to measure progress toward satisfying our performance obligations. Incurred cost represents work performed, which corresponds with, and thereby best depicts, the transfer of control to the customer. Contract costs include labor, material, subcontractor costs and indirect expenses. This continuous transfer of control to the customer is supported by clauses in our contracts with U.S. Government customers whereby the customer may terminate a contract for convenience and then pay for costs incurred plus a profit, at which time the customer would take control of any work in process. For non-U.S. Government contracts where we perform as a subcontractor and our order includes similar Federal Acquisition Regulation (the FAR) provisions as the prime contractor’s order from the U.S. Government, continuous transfer of control is likewise supported by such provisions. For other non-U.S. Government customers, continuous transfer of control to such customers is also supported due to general terms in our contracts and rights to recover damages which would include, among other potential damages, the right to payment for our work performed to date plus a reasonable profit.

Due to the transfer of control over time, revenue is recognized based on progress towards completion of the performance obligation. The selection of the method to measure progress towards completion requires judgment and is based on the nature of the performance obligations. WeManagement generally useuses the cost-to-cost measure of progress on a proportional performance basis for ourits long-term contracts because itmanagement believes that measure best depicts the transfer of control to the customer, which occurs as we incurthe Company incurs costs on ourthe contracts. Under the cost-to-cost measure of progress, the extent of progress towards completion is measured based on the ratio of costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs at completion of the performance obligation.obligation, which includes both the actual costs already incurred and the estimated costs to complete. Revenues are recorded proportionallyproportionately as costs are incurred. Due to the nature of the work required to be performed on certain of ourthe performance obligations, themanagement’s estimation of total revenue and costcosts at completion is complex, subject to many variables and requires significant judgment. Contract estimates are based on various assumptions, including labor and subcontractor costs, materials and other direct costs, and the complexity of the work to be performed. A
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to revenue recognition - estimated costs to complete long-term contracts is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant changejudgment by management when estimating costs at completion and (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in oneperforming procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to labor and subcontractor costs and materials and other direct costs.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the revenue recognition process, including controls over the determination of estimated contract revenue and costs. These procedures included, among others, (i) testing management’s process for estimating costs at completion for a sample of contracts (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the cost-to-cost measure of progress, (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of data used by management, and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of management’s significant assumptions related to labor and subcontractor costs and materials and other direct costs. Evaluating management’s significant assumptions involved assessing whether the assumptions were reasonable by (i) performing a comparison of the originally estimated and actual costs incurred on a sample of similar completed contracts; (ii) assessing the reasonableness of estimated costs to complete on a sample of in-process contracts, including the timing of costs incurred and the related impacts on revenue; and (iii) performing retrospective reviews of a sample of contracts to understand and corroborate management’s estimation process and budget-to-actual variances, if any.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Washington, District of Columbia
March 15, 2024
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2022.
41

Table of Contents
TELOS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
   Revenue – services$135,175 $192,742 
   Revenue – products10,203 24,145 
Total revenue145,378 216,887 
   Cost of sales – services (excluding depreciation and amortization)83,159 120,541 
   Cost of sales – products (excluding depreciation and amortization)5,733 16,510 
Depreciation and amortization3,544 793 
Total cost of sales92,436 137,844 
Gross profit52,942 79,043 
Selling, general and administrative expenses:
   Sales and marketing7,122 16,582 
   Research and development12,247 16,918 
   General and administrative73,888 99,393 
Total selling, general and administrative expenses93,257 132,893 
Operating loss(40,315)(53,850)
   Other income6,715 1,350 
   Interest expense(786)(874)
Loss before income taxes(34,386)(53,374)
Provision for income taxes(36)(54)
Net loss$(34,422)$(53,428)
Net loss per share:
   Basic$(0.50)$(0.79)
   Diluted$(0.50)$(0.79)
Weighted-average share outstanding:
   Basic69,256 67,559 
   Diluted69,256 67,559 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
42

Table of Contents
TELOS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Net loss$(34,422)$(53,428)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
   Foreign currency translation adjustments(5)(28)
Comprehensive loss$(34,427)$(53,456)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
43

Table of Contents
TELOS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2023
20232022
(in thousands, except per share and share data)
Assets:
   Cash and cash equivalents$99,260 $119,305 
   Accounts receivable, net30,424 40,069 
   Inventories, net1,420 2,877 
   Prepaid expenses7,520 4,819 
   Other current assets1,367 893 
      Total current assets139,991 167,963 
Property and equipment, net3,457 4,787 
Finance lease right-of-use assets, net6,612 7,832 
Operating lease right-of-use assets216 341 
Goodwill17,922 17,922 
Intangible assets, net39,616 37,415 
Other assets885 1,137 
      Total assets$208,699 $237,397 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
Liabilities:
   Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities$13,750 $22,551 
   Accrued compensation and benefits14,569 8,388 
   Contract liabilities6,728 6,444 
   Finance lease obligations – current portion1,730 1,592 
   Operating lease obligations – current portion97 361 
Other financing obligations – current portion— 1,247 
   Other current liabilities2,324 4,919 
      Total current liabilities39,198 45,502 
   Finance lease obligations – non-current portion9,518 11,248 
   Operating lease obligations – non-current portion123 27 
Other financing obligations – non-current portion— 7,211 
   Deferred income taxes813 758 
   Other liabilities44 297 
      Total liabilities49,696 65,043 
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 70,239,890 shares and 67,431,632 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively109 106 
   Additional paid-in capital433,781 412,708 
   Accumulated other comprehensive loss(60)(55)
   Accumulated deficit(274,827)(240,405)
      Total stockholders' equity159,003 172,354 
      Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$208,699 $237,397 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
44

Table of Contents
TELOS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss$(34,422)$(53,428)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash flows from operations:
Stock-based compensation24,396 64,660 
Depreciation and amortization9,429 5,890 
Provision for doubtful accounts152 99 
Deferred income tax provision55 35 
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
Accretion of discount on acquisition holdback48 
Amortization of debt issuance costs69 — 
Gain on early extinguishment of other financing obligations(1,427)— 
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable9,493 19,675 
Inventories1,457 (1,630)
Intangible assets – software held for resale— (7,120)
Prepaid expenses, other current assets and other assets(3,058)(1,249)
Accounts payable and other accrued payables(8,817)(12,322)
Accrued compensation and benefits6,602 (317)
Contract liabilities283 63 
Other current liabilities and other liabilities(2,629)2,100 
Net cash provided by operating activities1,587 16,508 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capitalized software development costs(14,552)(12,708)
Purchases of property and equipment(926)(1,009)
Net cash used in investing activities(15,478)(13,717)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments under finance lease obligations(1,592)(1,461)
Repurchase of common stock(139)(11,145)
Payment of tax withholding related to net share settlement of equity awards(3,742)(5,671)
Payments for debt issuance costs(114)(95)
Payments of DFT holdback amount(564)— 
Proceeds from other financing obligations— 9,092 
Payments of other financing obligations— (635)
Net cash used in financing activities(6,151)(9,915)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash(20,042)(7,124)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period119,438 126,562 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period$99,396 $119,438 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
45

Table of Contents
TELOS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common StockAdditional
Paid–in Capital
Accumulated Other Comprehensive LossAccumulated
Deficit
Total
Stockholders' Equity
SharesAmount
(in thousands)
Balance December 31, 202166,767 $105 $367,153 $(27)$(186,977)$180,254 
Net loss— — — (53,428)(53,428)
Foreign currency translation loss— — — (28)— (28)
Stock-based compensation— — 62,511 — — 62,511 
Restricted stock unit award vested, net of shares withheld to cover tax withholding2,214 (5,673)— — (5,671)
Repurchase of common stock(1,550)(1)(11,283)— — (11,284)
Balance December 31, 202267,431 106 412,708 (55)(240,405)172,354 
Net loss— — — — (34,422)(34,422)
Foreign currency translation loss— — — (5)— (5)
Stock-based compensation— — 22,874 — — 22,874 
Restricted stock unit award vested, net of shares withheld to cover tax withholding2,032 (3,743)— — (3,741)
Issuance of common stock for 401K match777 1,942 — — 1,943 
Balance December 31, 202370,240 $109 $433,781 $(60)$(274,827)$159,003 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
46

Table of Contents
TELOS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION
Telos Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, (collectively, the "Company" or more"Telos" or "We" or "Our"), a Maryland corporation, is a leading provider of cyber, cloud and enterprise security solutions for the world's most security-conscious organizations. We own all of the issued and outstanding share capital of Xacta Corporation and ubIQuity.com, inc., (a holding company for Xacta Corporation), and 100% ownership interest in Telos Identity Management Solutions, LLC ("Telos ID"), Teloworks, Inc. ("Teloworks") and Telos APAC Pte. Ltd.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation and Principle of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Telos and its subsidiaries (see Note 1 – Organization), all of whose issued and outstanding share capital is wholly-owned directly and indirectly by the Telos Corporation. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"), and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
Basis of Comparison
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year's consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year's presentation. In the current period, we reclassified and presented depreciation and amortization separately from the cost of sales line items. The reclassification had no impact on the statement of operations.
Segment Reporting
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker ("CODM"), or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. We operate our business in two reportable and operating segments: Security Solutions and Secure Networks. These segments enable the alignment of our strategies and objectives and provide a framework for the timely and rational allocation of resources within business lines. We eliminate any inter-segment revenues and expenses upon consolidation. See Note 18 Segment Information for further information.
Use of Estimates
Preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenue, expenses, assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company regularly assesses these estimates; however, actual results could differ from those estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience, currently available information, and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances.
Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, including those relating to revenue recognition on cost estimation on certain contracts, allowance for credit losses, inventory obsolescence, valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, income taxes, certain assumptions related to stock-based compensation, valuation of intangible assets and goodwill, restructuring expenses accruals, and contingencies. Actual results could affectdiffer from those estimates. The impact of changes in estimates is recorded in the profitabilityperiod in which they become known.
Concentrations
Financial instruments that subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, and accounts receivable.
In consideration that a large amount of our contracts.working capital and total assets are held in cash and cash equivalents, we are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by the financial institutions to the extent of the amounts held in excess of federal insurance limits. Due to the financial strength and high credit quality of the financial institutions where the accounts are held, we do not believe that this credit risk makes it reasonably possible that a near-term severe impact risk of loss will occur.
47

Table of Contents
The Company's receivables are primarily due from the U.S. government, or from prime contractors to whom we are subcontractors and the end customer is the U.S. government, and are generally considered collectable from the perspective of the customer's ability to pay. We review and update our contract-related estimates regularly and recognize adjustments in estimated profit on contracts on a cumulative catch-up basis, which may result in an adjustment increasing or decreasing revenue to date on a contract in a particular periodbelieve that the adjustmentcredit risk associated with our receivables is identified. Revenue and profit in future periods of contract performance are recognized using the adjusted estimate.

Revenue that is recognized at a point in time is for the sale of software licenses in our Information Assurance / Xacta® (previously referred to as Cyber & Cloud Solutions) and Secure Communications (previously referred to as Secure Communications Cyber and Enterprise Solutions) business groups and for the sale of resold products in Telos ID (previously referred to as Telos ID Enterprise Solutions) and Secure Networks (previously referred to as Secure Mobility and Network Management/Defense Enterprise Solutions), and is classified as product revenue.  Revenue on these contracts is recognized when the customer obtains control of the transferred product or service, which is generally upon delivery of the product to the customer for their use, due to us maintaining control of the product until that point. Orders for the sale of software licenses may contain multiple performance obligations, such as maintenance, training, or consulting services, which are typically delivered over time, consistent with the transfer of control disclosed above for the provision of services. When an order contains multiple performance obligations, we allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations using our best estimate of standalone selling price.

Contracts are routinely and often modified to account for changes in contract requirements, specifications, quantities, or price.  Depending on the nature of the modification, we determine whether to account for the modification as an adjustment to the existing contract or as a new contract.  Generally, modifications are not distinct from the existing contractlimited due to the significant interrelatedness of the performance obligations and are therefore accounted for as an adjustment to the existing contract, and recognized as a cumulative adjustment to revenue (as either an increase or reduction of revenue) based on the modification’s effect on progress toward completion of a performance obligation.

50

Our contracts may include various types of variable consideration, such as claims (for instance, indirect rate or other equitable adjustments) or incentive fees. We include estimated amounts in the transaction price based on all of the information available to us, including historical information and future estimations, and to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when any uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is resolved.  We have revised and re-submitted several years of incurred cost submissions reflecting certain indirect rate structure changes as a result of regular DCAA audits of incurred cost submissions.  This resulted in signed final rate agreement letters for fiscal years 2011 to 2013 and conformed incurred cost submissions for 2014 to 2015. We evaluated the resulting changes to revenue under the applicable cost plus fixed fee contracts for the years 2011 to 2015 as variable consideration, and determined the most likely amount to which we expect to be entitled, to the extent that no constraint exists that would preclude recognizing this revenue or result in a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized. We included these estimated amounts of variable consideration in the transaction price and as performance on these contracts is complete, we have recognized revenue of $6.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Historically, mostcreditworthiness of our contracts do not include award or incentive fees. For incentive fees, we would include such fees in the transaction price to the extent we could reasonably estimate the amount of the fee.  With limited historical experience, we have not included any revenue related to incentive fees in ourcustomers. We maintain an allowance for estimated transaction prices.  We may include in our contract estimates additional revenue for submitted contract modifications or claims against the customer when we believe we have an enforceable right to the modification or claim, the amount can be estimated reliably and its realization is probable. We consider the contractual/legal basis for the claim (in particular FAR provisions), the facts and circumstances around any additional costs incurred, the reasonableness of those costs and the objective evidence available to support such claims.potential credit losses.

For our contracts that have an original duration of one year or less, we use the practical expedient applicable to such contracts and do not consider the time value of money. We capitalize sales commissions related to proprietary software and related services that are directly tied to sales. We do not elect the practical expedient to expense as incurred the incremental costs of obtaining a contract if the amortization period would have been one year or less. For the sales commissions that are capitalized, we amortize the asset over the expected customer life, which is based on recent and historical data.

Contract assets are amounts that are invoiced as work progresses in accordance with agreed-upon contractual terms, either at periodic intervals or upon achievement of contractual milestones. Generally, revenue recognition occurs before billing, resulting in contract assets. These contract assets are referred to as unbilled receivables and are reported within accounts receivable, net of reserve on our consolidated balance sheets.

Billed receivables are amounts billed and due from our customers and are reported within accounts receivable, net of reserve on the consolidated balance sheets. The portion of the payments retained by the customer until final contract settlement is not considered a significant financing component due to the intent of the retainage being the customer’s protection with respect to full and final performance under the contract.

Contract liabilities are payments received in advance and milestone payments from our customers on selected contracts that exceed revenue earned to date, resulting in contract liabilities. Contract liabilities typically are not considered a significant financing component because they are generally satisfied within one year and are used to meet working capital demands that can be higher in the early stages of a contract. Contract liabilities are reported on our consolidated balance sheets on a net contract basis at the end of each reporting period.

We have one reportable segment. We treat sales to U.S. customers as sales within the U.S. regardless of where the services are performed. Substantially all of our revenues are from U.S. customers as revenue derived from international customers is de minimus. The following tables disclose revenue (in thousands) by customer type and contract type for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018.  Prior period amounts have not been adjusted under the modified retrospective method.

 
2020
  
2019
  
2018
 
Federal $171,677  $149,257  $129,279 
State & Local, and Commercial  8,240   9,961   8,737 
Total $179,917  $159,218  $138,016 

 
2020
  
2019
  
2018
 
Firm fixed-price $151,703  $131,629  $103,454 
Time-and-materials  13,455   14,569   16,795 
Cost plus fixed fee  14,759   13,020   17,767 
Total $179,917  $159,218  $138,016 

51

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had $127.7 million and $112.4 million of remaining performance obligations, respectively, which we also refer to as funded backlog. We expect to recognize approximately 92.4% of our remaining performance obligations as revenue in 2021, an additional 2.5% by 2022 and the balance thereafter. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the amount of revenue recognized during the year that was included in the opening contract liabilities balance was $5.3 million, $4.2 million, and $5.5 million, respectively. Contract liabilities were $5.7 million and $6.3 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Our
Restricted cash management program utilizes zero balance accounts. Accordingly, all book overdraft balances have been reclassified to accounts payable and other accrued liabilities.

In accordance with ASC 275-10-50-16, in considerationrepresents funds that such a large amount of our working capital and total assets are held in our money market account but precluded from use of general business needs through contractual requirements. We report our restricted cash balance within "Other assets" on the consolidated balance sheets.
Contract Balances
The timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of billing and cash equivalents, we have consideredreceipts from customers. Amounts are invoiced as work progresses, either at periodic intervals or upon achievement of contractual milestones. We record a contract asset when revenue is recognized prior to invoicing, or a contract liability when cash is received in advance or when milestone payments from customers exceed revenue earned to date.
A contract asset is a right to consideration that is conditional upon factors other than the balances heldpassage of time. Contract liabilities include deferred revenue, customer advances and billings in our various treasury accounts may exceed federally insured limits asexcess of revenue. Contract assets and liabilities are recorded net on a contract-by-contract basis and are classified based on the datecontract's operating cycle at the end of the financial statements. Due to the financial strength of the financial institution where the accounts are held, we do not believe that this concentration risk makes it reasonably possible that a near-term severe impact risk of loss will occur.each reporting period.

Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable includes the following:
Billed Receivables - Billed receivables are statedbalances where an invoice has been prepared and issued and is collectible under standard contract terms. Where we anticipate that an invoice will be issued within a short period of time and where the funds are considered collectible within standard contract terms, we include this balance as billable accounts receivable.
Unbilled Receivables - Unbilled receivables are balances which have not yet been billed due to timing, most commonly just a month delayed from the timing of revenue recognition and the actual bill being presented to the customer. The Company has fulfilled all requirements in order to bill the customer and collect the funds.
Contract Assets - Contract assets are receivables for which the right to consideration is conditional upon factors other than the passage of time. The timing of these billings is generally driven by contractual terms, which may have billing milestones that are different from revenue recognition milestones.
Both billed and unbilled balances are recorded at the invoicedtheir face amount less an allowance for doubtful accounts.credit losses over the contractual payment terms of the receivable. Collectability of accounts receivable is regularlythese amounts are periodically reviewed based upon managements’management's knowledge and analysis of available information as of the balance sheet date, including any specific circumstances related to overdue balances.balances, length of time that the receivable has been outstanding, historical bad debts and aging trends, and other general and contract specific factors. The allowance for doubtful accountscredit losses is adjusted based on such evaluation. Accounts receivable balances are written off against the allowance when management deems the balances uncollectible.

Our contract asset balance is recorded at the net amount expected to be billed for services performed once the objective criteria laid out by the contract has been met.
Inventories
Inventories are statedvalued at the lower of cost or net realizable value, where cost is determined using the weighted averageweighted-average method. Substantially all inventories consistThe value of inventory is adjusted for damaged, obsolete, excess and slowing-moving inventory. Net realizable value of inventory is estimated based on the historical obsolescence experience and planned usage.
Inventories are substantially comprised of finished goods purchased customerfor customers, such as off-the-shelf hardware and software, and component computer parts used in connection with system integration services that we perform. An allowance for obsolete, slow-moving or nonsalable inventory is provided for all other inventory. This allowance is based on our overall obsolescence experience and our assessment of future inventory requirements.  This charge is taken primarily due to the age of the specific inventory and the significant additional costs that would be necessary to upgrade to current standards as well as the lack of forecasted sales for such inventory in the near future. Gross inventory was $4.2 million and $2.8 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.  As of December 31, 2020, it is management’s judgment that we have fully provided for any potential inventory obsolescence.

52

The components of the allowance for inventory obsolescence are set forth below (in thousands):

 
Balance
Beginning of
Year
  Additions Charge to Costs and Expense  
Recoveries
  
Balance
End of
Year
 
             
Year Ended December 31, 2020 $860  $(1) $(8) $851 
Year Ended December 31, 2019 $520  $376  $(36) $860 
Year Ended December 31, 2018 $1,484  $30  $(994) $520 

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is recorded at cost. Depreciation is providedover the assets' estimated useful lives using the straight-line method, at rates based onwhich is three to five years for furniture and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the estimatedshorter of their useful liveslife or the remaining terms of the individual assets or classeslease.
48

Table of assets as follows:Contents

Furniture and equipment3-5   Years
Leasehold improvementsLesser of life of lease or useful life of asset
Property and equipment under finance leasesLesser of life of lease or useful life of asset

Leased property meeting certain criteria is capitalized at the present value of the related minimum lease payments. Amortization of property and equipment under finance leases is computed using the straight-line method over the lesser of the term of the related lease and the useful life of the related asset.

Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the costs and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss on such disposition is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2023 and 2018,2022, such amounts are negligible. Expenditures for repairs
Repairs and maintenance costs are charged to operationsexpensed as incurred. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.

Leases
Long-livedWe determine if an arrangement is a lease and we account for leases in accordance with ASC Topic 842, "Leases." We entered into contractual arrangements primarily for the use of real estate facilities, and certain other equipment. We determine the classification of the lease under these arrangements, if any, at inception based on: (1) whether the contract involves the use of a distinct identified asset, (2) whether we obtain the right to substantially all the economic benefits from the use of the asset throughout the period, and (3) whether we have a right to direct the use of the asset.
Leased property meeting certain criteria is capitalized at the present value of the related minimum lease payments. Amortization of a finance lease ROU asset is computed using the straight-line method over the lesser of the lease term or the useful life of the related asset.
In accordance with ASC 842, we recorded operating lease ROU assets, suchwhich represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and operating lease liabilities which represent our obligation to make lease payments. Generally, we enter into operating lease agreements for facilities. The amount of operating lease liabilities due within 12 months are recorded in other current liabilities, with the remaining operating lease liabilities recorded as fixednon-current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets based on their contractual due dates. The operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized as of the lease commencement date at the present value of the lease payments over the lease term. Most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate that can readily be determined. Therefore, we use a discount rate based on our incremental borrowing rate on all operating leases. Some of our operating leases contain lease and non-lease components, which we account for as a single component. Operating lease expense is recognized as rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and recorded within our consolidated statement of operations.
The related lease payments on short-term lease arrangements (leases of one year or less) are recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
ROU assets are assessed for potential impairment whenever there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable and the carrying amount of the assets exceeds its estimated fair value.
Software Development Costs
We account for development costs of software in accordance with ASC Topic 985-20 ("ASC 985-20"), "Software – Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased, or Marketed" and ASC Topic 350-40 ("ASC 350-40") "Internal Use Software", depending on the intended use of the software being developed. Under ASC 985-20, all costs of developing software prior to establishing its technological feasibility are research and development costs and are expensed as incurred. Once technological feasibility has been established, subsequent costs should be capitalized until the software begins to be marketed or is released to customers after which the capitalized costs should be amortized and reviewed for impairment. Under ASC 350-40, we capitalize certain software development costs when the preliminary project stage is completed and the software has entered the application development stage. Once substantial testing is complete and the software is ready to be used, capitalization of costs ceases.
Capitalized software development costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic life of the application, ranging from two to five years, beginning when the asset is ready for its intended use.
ASC 350-40 also requires hosting arrangements that are service contracts to follow the guidance for internal-use software to determine which implementation costs can be capitalized. In accordance with ASC 350-40, (i) capitalized implementation costs are classified in the same balance sheet line item as the amounts prepaid for the related hosting arrangement, (ii) amortization of capitalized implementation costs is presented in the same income statement line item as the service fees for the related hosting arrangement, and (iii) cash flows related to capitalized implementation costs are presented within the same category of cash flow activity as the cash flow for the related hosting arrangements (i.e. operating activity). As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the net carrying value of the capitalized implementation costs related to hosting arrangements that were incurred during the application development stage aggregated to $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. These costs are related primarily to the implementation of a new enterprise resource planning system. The Company begins amortizing the capitalized implementation costs after all substantial testing is complete and ready for its intended use, and amortized over the expected term of the arrangement on a straight-line basis.
Software costs classified as held for resale are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Software held for resale is amortized into cost of sales on the consolidated statements of operations. The Company reported the software held for resale as part of the Intangible Assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
49

Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is recorded for the difference between the aggregate consideration paid for an acquisition and the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized, but rather tested for potential impairment. We evaluate the impairment of goodwill in accordance with ASC 350, which requires goodwill to be assessed on at least an annual basis, as of December 31 each year, for impairment using a fair value basis. Between annual evaluations, if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount, then impairment must be evaluated. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or business climate, (2) a loss of key contracts or customers, or (3) negative operating performance indicators. The Company performs its goodwill impairment test at the reporting unit level.
We may elect to utilize a qualitative assessment to evaluate whether it is "more-likely-than-not" that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If an impairment indicator exists based on the qualitative assessment, we perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. When performing a quantitative impairment test, we calculate the estimated fair value of the reporting unit and compare the results with its respective carrying value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value is determined to be less than the carrying value, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between the reporting unit's fair value and the reporting unit's carrying value, up to the amount of goodwill associated with the reporting unit.
The evaluation is based on the estimation of the fair values at the reporting unit level in comparison to the reporting unit's net asset carrying values. The Company uses industry accepted valuation models and set criteria that are reviewed and approved by management. The methodology used to assess impairment is a combination of the income approach (i.e. discounted cash flow ("DCF") method) and the market approach (i.e. Comparable Public Company ("CPC") method) to determine the fair value.
In the application of the income approach, the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is determined using a DCF analysis, which requires management's judgment with respect to forecasted revenue streams and operating margins, capital expenditures and the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate commensurate with the risk inherent in each of our reporting unit's current business model. We utilize the weighted average cost of capital ("WACC") as derived by certain assumptions specific to our facts and circumstances as the discount rate.
In the application of the market approach, the CPC method uses value multiples or ratio to the reporting accounting data (such as revenue) in measuring the market's perception of the reporting unit's enterprise value. Value multiples or ratio reflect the trends in growth and performance, and the comparable public companies provide a reasonable basis for comparison to the relative investment characteristic of the business being valued. The Company analyzes the relationship between the comparable companies' performance and applies a control premium based on the multiples of comparable companies. The control premium is management's estimate of how much a market participant would be willing to pay over the fair market value in consideration of benefits that flow from control of the entity.
The results of the income and market approaches are weighted to determine the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. The weighting is judgmental and is based on the perceived level of appropriateness of the valuation methodology. Estimating the fair value involves the use of assumptions and significant judgments that are based on a number of factors including actual operating results. A relatively small change in the underlying assumptions may cause a change in the results of the impairment assessment in future periods and as such, could result in goodwill impairment.
The Company's goodwill is amortized and deducted over a 15-year period for tax purposes. See Note 7 – Goodwill for additional information.
Intangible assets with finite lives are carried at cost, less accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed using the method that best reflects how their economic benefits are utilized or, if a pattern of economic benefits cannot be reliably determined, on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates its long-lived assets, including property and equipment, for potential impairment whenever there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If such evaluation indicates that the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated future undiscounted cash flows or its estimated fair value, an impairment loss is recognized to reduce the asset's carrying amount to its estimated fair value. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate its fair value. Accordingly, actual results could differ from such estimates. No events have been identified that caused an evaluation of the recoverability of long-lived assets.

50

Depreciation andIn addition to the recoverability assessment, the Company routinely reviews the remaining lives of its long-lived assets. Any reduction in the useful life assumptions will result in increased depreciation or amortization expense related to property and equipment, including property and equipment under finance leases was $5.4 million, $5.0 million, and $3.0 million in the period when such determinations are made, as well as in subsequent periods. There are no changes in the estimated useful lives of long-lived assets for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,periods presented.
Fair Value Measurements
U.S. GAAP provides a framework for measuring fair value and 2018, respectively.

Software Development Costs
Our policy on accounting for development costsexpands disclosures about fair value measurements. The framework requires the valuation of softwareinvestments using a three-tiered approach. The statement requires fair value measurement to be sold isclassified and disclosed in accordance with ASC Topic 985-20, “Software – Costsone of Softwarethe following categories:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets and liabilities;
Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; or
Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to be Sold, Leased,the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported by little or Marketed” and ASC Topic 350-40 “Internal Use Software” in so far as our Xacta products being available in various deployment modalities including on premises licenses and cloud-based Software as a Service (“SaaS”)no market activity). Under both standards, software development costs are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility is reached, at which time additional costs are capitalized until the product is available for general release to customers or is ready for its intended use, as appropriate. Technological feasibility is established when all planning, designing, coding and testing activities have been completed, and all risks have been identified. Beginning with the second quarter of 2017, software development costs are capitalized and amortized over the estimated product life of 2 years on a straight-line basis.
As of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, we capitalized $12.3 milliondid not have any financial instruments with significant Level 3 inputs and $5.6 millionwe did not have any financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
For certain of our non-derivative financial instruments, including receivables, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, the carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses consist primarily of employee-related expenses (such as salaries, taxes, benefits and stock-based compensation), allocated overhead costs and outside services costs related to the development and improvement of the Company's software. Research and development costs are generally expensed as incurred, except for costs incurred in connection with the development of software that qualify for the capitalization as described in our software development costs respectively, whichpolicy. Amortization of capitalized software development costs, not charged under cost of sales, are includedalso reported as a part of propertyresearch and equipment. Amortizationdevelopment expenses.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed and included in sales and marketing expense when incurred. Advertising expense was $1.7 million, $1.8$0.8 million and $1.1$1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2023 and 2018,2022, respectively. Accumulated amortization was $4.8 million and $3.1 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company analyzes the net realizable value of capitalized software development costs on at least an annual basis and has determined that there is no indication of impairment of the capitalized software development costs as forecasted future sales are adequate to support amortization costs.

Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Income"Income Taxes." Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences of temporary differences and income tax credits. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured by applying enacted statutory tax rates that are applicable to the future years in which deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be settled or realized for differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Any change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in net income in the period in which the tax rate change is enacted. We record a valuation allowance that reduces deferred tax assets when it is “more"more likely than not”not" that deferred tax assets will not be realized. We are required to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Based on available evidence, realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income.  We considered projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and reversal of taxable temporary differences in making this assessment. As such, we have determined that a full valuation allowance is required as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. As a result of a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, a deferred tax liability related to goodwill remains on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2020 and 2019. Due to the tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, net operating losses generated in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 will have an indefinite carryforward period, which will be available to offset future taxable income created by the reversal of temporary taxable differences related to goodwill.  As a result, we have adjusted the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2020 and 2019.  See additional information on tax reform and its impact on our income taxes in Note 9 – Income Taxes.

We follow the provisions of ASC 740 related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The accounting estimates related to liabilities for uncertain tax positions require us to make judgments regarding the sustainability of each uncertain tax position based on its technical merits. If we determine it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained based on its technical merits, we record the impact of the position in our consolidated financial statements at the largest amount that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. These estimates are updated at each reporting date based on the facts, circumstances and information available. We are also required to assess at each reporting date whether it is reasonably possible that any significant increases or decreases to our unrecognized tax benefits will occur during the next 12 months.

Business Combinations
Goodwill
We evaluateAcquisitions were accounted for under U.S. GAAP using the impairment of goodwillacquisition method in accordance with ASC 350, which requires goodwill805, Business Combinations. The Company allocates the fair value of purchase consideration to the tangible and indefinite-lived intangible assets to be assessedacquired and liabilities assumed based on at least an annual basis for impairment using atheir estimated fair values. The excess of the fair value basis. Between annual evaluations,of purchase consideration over the values of these identifiable assets and liabilities, if events occurany, is recorded as goodwill.
51

The accounting for business combinations requires management to make judgments and estimates of the fair value of assets acquired, including the identification and valuation of intangible assets, as well as liabilities and contingencies assumed. Such judgments and estimates directly impact the amount of goodwill recognized in connection with an acquisition. Estimating the fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including intangibles, requires judgment about expected future cash flows, weighted-average cost of capital, discount rates and expected long-term growth rates.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company grants stock-based compensation awards under the 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the "2016 LTIP"). Our 2016 LTIP provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, unrestricted stock and dividend equivalent rights to our senior executives, directors, employees, and other eligible service providers. The stock options granted under the 2016 LTIP expire no more than 10 years after the date of grant.
Awards granted under the 2016 LTIP vest over the periods determined by the Board of Directors or circumstances change that would more likely than not reducethe Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, who has the discretion to establish the terms, conditions and criteria of the various awards, including the weighting and vesting schedule of Service-Based RSUs and the performance conditions applicable to the Performance-Based RSUs, including the achievement of certain financial performance criteria or price targets for our common stock.
The restricted stock units granted are time-based ("Service-Based RSU" or "RSU") and performance-based ("Performance-Based RSU" or "PSU"). The Company issues new shares of common stock upon vesting of the restricted stock units under this plan.
Service-Based RSUs granted to eligible employees as an incentive generally vest in installments over a period of up to three years from the date of grant. The grant date fair value per share is equal to the closing stock price on the date of grant.
Performance-Based RSUs vest upon the achievement of a defined performance target during a defined performance period from the date of grant. The fair value per share of these Performance-Based RSUs is equal to the closing stock price on the date of the grant or the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount, then impairment must be evaluated. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1)award on the grant date as determined through an independent valuation for Performance-Based RSUs with market conditions. Performance-Based RSUs vest upon the achievement of certain price targets or market conditions for the Company's common stock anytime or certain operational milestones over a significant adverse change in legal factors or business climate, or (2)three-year period from the date of grant. In order to reflect the substantive characteristics of these market condition awards, the Company employs a loss of key contracts or customers.

AsMonte Carlo simulation valuation model to calculate the result of an acquisition, we record any excess purchase price over the net tangiblegrant date fair value and identifiable intangible assets acquired as goodwill. An allocationcorresponding requisite service period of the purchase priceaward. Monte Carlo approaches are a class of computational algorithms that rely on repeated random sampling to tangible and intangible net assets acquired is based upon our valuationcompute their results. This approach allows the calculation of the acquired assets. Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to annual impairment tests. We complete our goodwill impairment tests asvalue of December 31st each year. Additionally, we make evaluations between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reducesuch awards based on a large number of possible stock price path scenarios.
The Company estimates the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The evaluation is basedstock options on the estimationdate of the grant using an option pricing model. The option pricing model takes into consideration the current share price of the underlying common stock, exercise price of the option, expected term, risk-free interest rate and the volatility of share price. These considerations directly affect the amount of compensation expense that will ultimately be recognized.
We recognize these stock-based payment transactions when services from the employees, directors and other eligible service providers are received and recognize a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital in our consolidated balance sheets. The measurement objective for these equity awards is the estimated fair valuesvalue at the date of our three reporting units, CO&D (comprisedgrant of Information Assurance / Xactathe equity instruments that we are obligated to issue when employees, directors and Secure Networks), Telos ID,other eligible service providers have rendered the requisite service and Secure Communications, ofsatisfied any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments.
The stock-based compensation expense for an award is recognized ratably over the requisite service period, which goodwill is housedgenerally the vesting period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award. Stock-based compensation expense for awards with performance conditions is recognized over the CO&D reporting unit, in comparisonrequisite service period if it is probable that the performance condition will be satisfied. If such performance conditions are not or are no longer considered probable, no compensation expense for these awards is recognized, and any previously recognized expense is reversed. If the performance condition is achieved prior to the reporting unit’s net asset carrying values. Our discounted cash flows required management’s judgment with respect to forecasted revenue streams and operating margins, capital expenditures and the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate. We utilized the weighted average cost of capital as derived by certain assumptions specific to our facts and circumstances as the discount rate. The net assets attributable to the reporting units are determined based upon the estimated assets and liabilities attributable to the reporting units in deriving its free cash flows. In addition, the estimatecompletion of the total fair value of our reporting units is compared to the market capitalization of the Company.  The Company’s assessment resulted in a fair value that was greater than the Company’s carrying value, therefore no impairment of goodwill was recorded as of December 31, 2020. Subsequent reviews may result in future periodic impairments that could have a material adverse effect on the results of operationsrequisite service period, any unrecognized compensation expense will be recognized in the period recognized. Recent operating results have reduced the projectionperformance condition is achieved. Compensation expense for awards with market conditions is recognized over the derived service period, or sooner, if the market condition is achieved. Previously recognized expense for awards with market conditions will never be reversed subsequent to completion of future cash flow growth potential, which indicates that certain negative potential events, suchthe derived service period even if the market conditions are never achieved. We recognize forfeitures of stock-based compensation awards as a material loss or losses on contracts, or failure to achieve projected growth could result in impairment inthey occur. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized as part of the future. We estimate fair valuecost of our reporting unitsales and compare the valuation with the respective carrying value for the reporting unit to determine whether any goodwill impairment exists. If we determine through the impairment review process that goodwill is impaired, we will record an impairment chargeselling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations. . Goodwill is amortized and deducted over a 15-year period for tax purposes.

Stock-Based Compensation
Compensation cost isThe stock-based payment transactions are recognized based on the requirements of ASC 718, “Stock Compensation,” for all share-based awards granted.  Since June 2008, we have issued restricted stock to our executive officers, directors and employees. 79,361 shares were granted in 2020. Such stock is subject to a vesting schedule as follows:  25% of the restricted stock vests immediately on the date of grant, thereafter, an additional 25% will vest annually on the anniversary of the date of grant subject to continued employment or services. As of December 31, 2020, there were 59,521 shares of restricted stock that remained subject to vesting. In the event of death of the employee or a change in control, as defined by the Telos Corporation 2008 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, the 2013 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, all unvested shares shall automatically vest in full. In accordance with ASC 718, we recorded immaterial compensation expense for any of the issuances as the value of the common stock was nominal prior"Compensation - Stock Compensation" and ASU 2018-07, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to the initial public offering of our common stock, based on the deduction of our outstanding debt, capital lease obligations, and preferred stock from an estimated enterprise value, which was estimated based on discounted cash flow analysis, comparable public company analysis, and comparable transaction analysis. Additionally, we determined that a significant change in the valuation estimate for common stock would not have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Non-employee Share-Based Payment Accounting."
52

Table of Contents
Net (Loss)/Earnings (Loss) per Share
Basic net (loss)/earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net loss(loss)/earnings by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without consideration for potentially dilutive securities. Diluted net (loss)/earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net (loss)/earnings (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the period determined using the treasury-stock and if-converted methods. Dilutive common stock equivalents are comprised of unvested restricted common stock and warrants.

Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income
For one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the year ended December 31, 2019,functional currency is the Class A common basiclocal currency. For this subsidiary, the translation of its foreign currency into U.S. dollars is performed for assets and diluted net loss per share was $(0.17),liabilities using current foreign currency exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using average foreign currency exchange rates during the Class A common basicperiods presented. Translation gains and diluted weighted-average shares were 34,525, the Class B common basic and diluted net loss per share was $(0.17), and the Class B common basic and diluted weighted-average shares were 3,204.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Class A common basic and diluted net loss per share was $(0.04), and the Class A common basic and diluted weighted-average shares were 33,558, the Class B common basic and diluted net loss per share was $(0.04), and the Class B common basic and diluted weighted-average shares were 3,204.

Potentially dilutive securities notlosses are included in the calculation of diluted net earnings (loss) per share because to do so would be anti-dilutive are as follows (in common stock equivalent shares):

 
Year Ended December 31,
 
  
2020
  
2019
 
Unvested restricted stock
  
60
   
945
 
Common stock warrants, exercisable at $1.665/sh.
  
901
   
901
 
Total
  
961
   
1,846
 

On November 12, 2020, we amended our Articles of Amendment and Restatement to effect an approximate 0.794-for-1 reverse stock split with respect to our common stock. The par value and the authorized shares of the common stock were not adjustedstockholders' equity as a resultcomponent of the reverse stock split. The accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements give retroactive effect to the reverse stock split for all periods presented.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner sources. Our accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was comprised/income.
Restructuring Expenses
The determination of when the Company accrues for involuntary termination benefits under restructuring plans depends on whether the termination benefits are provided under an on-going benefit arrangement or under a lossone-time benefit arrangement. The Company accounts for on-going benefit arrangements, such as those documented by employment agreements, in accordance with ASC 712 ("ASC 712"), "Compensation – Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits." Under ASC 712, liabilities for postemployment benefits are recorded at the time of obligations are probable of being incurred and can be reasonably estimated. When applicable, the Company records such costs into operating expenses.
In the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company committed to a restructuring plan to streamline its workforce and spending to better align its cost structure with its volume of business. The restructuring plan reduced the Company's workforce, with a majority of the affected employees separating from foreign currency translation of $63,000the business in early 2023. In connection with this restructuring plan, the Company incurred restructuring-related costs, including employees' severance and $101,000 as of December 31, 2020related benefit costs. Employee severance and 2019, respectively;related benefit costs include cash payments, outplacement services and actuarial gain on pension liability adjustments in Teloworks of $107,000 as of December 31, 2020continuing health insurance coverage. Severance costs pursuant to ongoing-benefit arrangements are recognized when probable and 2019.

Financial Instruments
We use various methodsreasonably estimated. Other related costs include external consulting and assumptionsadvisory fees related to estimateimplementing the restructuring plan. These costs are recognized at fair value of our financial instruments. Duein the period in which the costs are incurred.
In fiscal year 2022, the Company estimated that the expected restructuring expenses were $2.8 million. In fiscal year 2023, the Company updated its total expected restructuring plan costs to their short-term nature, the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value. The fair value of long-term debt is$3.9 million, based on the discounted cash flows for similar term borrowings based on market pricesCompany's review of the restructuring plan for the same or similar issues.remainder of the fiscal year. The restructuring expenses are recorded under "Selling, general and administrative expenses" on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

At each reporting date, the Company evaluates its restructuring expense accrual to determine if the liabilities reported are still appropriate. Any changes in the estimated costs of executing the approved restructuring plan are reflected in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Fair value estimates
Table 1: Summary of Changes in Restructuring Expenses Accrual
Severance and related benefit costs (1)
Other related costsTotal
(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2022$2,763 $— $2,763 
(Adjustments)/charges(168)1,300 1,132 
Cash payments(2,195)(1,300)(3,495)
Balance at December 31, 2023$400 $— $400 
(1) Restructuring-related liabilities are made at a specific pointreported as part of "Other current liabilities" in time, based on relevant market information. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve matters of judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.Company's unaudited consolidated balance sheets, see Note 9 - Other Balance Sheet Components for further details.

55

RecentRecently Accounting Pronouncements - Adopted
In June 2016,March 2020, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit LossesNo. 2020-04, "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 326)848): MeasurementFacilitation of Credit Lossesthe Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Instruments,”Reporting," which introduces new guidanceprovides optional expedients and exceptions for estimating credit losses on certain typesa limited period of financial instruments based ontime to ease the potential burden in accounting for contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected losses and the timingto be discontinued because of the recognition of such losses.reference rate reform. This standardamendment is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning afterall entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 15, 2019, which made this standard effective for us on January 1, 2020.31, 2022. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations andor cash flows.

53

Table of Contents
In January 2017,October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, "Intangibles - GoodwillNo. 2021-08, "Business Combination (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers," which eliminates Step 2 ofrequires entities to apply Topic 606 to recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities in a business combination. The ASU improves comparability after the current goodwill impairment testbusiness combination by providing consistent recognition and measurement guidance for revenue contracts with customers acquired in a business combination and revenue contracts with customers not acquired in a business combination. Entities should apply the amendments prospectively to business combinations that requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill impairment. A goodwill impairment loss insteadoccur after the effective date. This standard is measured at the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the recorded amount of goodwill. The provisions of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, which made this standard2022, with early adoption permitted. This ASU is applied prospectively to business combinations occurring on or after the effective for us on January 1, 2020.date of the amendment. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations andor cash flows.

In August 2018,September 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)No. 2022-04, "Liabilities - Supplier Finance Programs (Subtopic 405-50): Disclosure Framework – Changesof Supplier Finance Program Obligations," which requires a company that uses a supplier finance program in connection with the purchase of goods or services to disclose sufficient information about the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement”, which modifiesprogram to allow a user of the disclosure requirement for fair value measurement under ASC 820financial statements to improveunderstand the effectiveness of such disclosures. Those modifications includeprogram's nature, activity during the removalperiod, changes from period to period, and addition of disclosure requirements as well as clarifying specific disclosure requirements.potential magnitude. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, which made this standard effective for us on January 1, 2020.2022, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU diddoes not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018‑15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract,” which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software.  This standard will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, which made this standard effective for us on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Not Yet Adopted
In December 2019,June 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, “Income Taxes2022-03, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 740)820): SimplifyingFair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions," which clarifies that a contractual restriction on the Accounting for Income Taxes,” which simplifiessale of an equity security is not considered part of the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions tounit of account of the general principlesequity security and, therefore, is not considered in Topic 740. The ASU also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application.measuring fair value. This standard will be effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2020,2023, with early adoption permitted. While we are currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this ASU, we do not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

Note 2.  PurchaseIn July 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-03, "Presentation of Telos ID/Non-Controlling Interests

On October 5, 2020, we entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement betweenFinancial Statements (Topic 205), Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), Equity (Topic 505), and Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)". This update requires (1) to disclose and present income or loss related to common stock transactions on the Company and Hoya ID Fund A, LLC (“Hoya”) to purchase allface of the Class B Unitsincome statement, (2) to modify the existing classification and measurement of Telos ID (“Telos ID Units”) owned by Hoya (the “Telos ID Purchase”). Uponredeemable preferred shares and redeemable equity-classified shares, and (3) modify accounting treatment for stock-based compensation. The FASB has not set an effective date on this ASU and adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the closingimpact of the Telos ID Purchase, Telos ID becameASU on our wholly owned subsidiary. On November 23, 2020,consolidated financial statement disclosures.
In August 2023, the Telos ID Purchase was consummatedFASB issued ASU No. 2023-05, "Business Combinations - Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805-60): Recognition and Initial Measurement," which requires that a joint venture apply a new basis of accounting upon formation and would initially measure its assets and liabilities at fair value. Joint ventures should apply the amendments prospectively with the Company transferring $30.0 million in cash and issuing 7,278,040 shares of our common stock at $20.39 per share (which totals approximately $148.4 million);formation date on or after January 1, 2025, with early adoption permitted. While we are currently assessing the total consideration transferred to Hoya was $178.4 million. As partimpact of the common stock issuance,adoption of this ASU, we do not believe the Company recognizedadoption of this ASU will have a creditmaterial impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
In October 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-06, "Disclosure Improvements: Codification Amendments in Response to APICthe SEC's Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiatives," which modify the disclosure or presentation requirements of $148.4 million. a variety of Topics in the Codification, certain of the amendment represent clarifications to or technical corrections of the current requirements. The effective dates for each amendment will be the date on which the SEC's removal of that related disclosure requirement from Regulation S-X or Regulation S-K becomes effective, with early adoption prohibited. For all entities within the scope of the affected Codification subtopics, if by June 30, 2027, the SEC has not removed the applicable requirement from Regulation S-X or Regulation S-K, the pending content of the associated amendment will be removed from the Codification and will not become effective for any entities. While we are currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this ASU, we do not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, "Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosure," which requires improvement on reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. The standard will be effective for fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2023 and interim periods within fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. We are currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this ASU on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
54

Table of Contents
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosure," which requires public entities, on an annual basis, (1) disclose specific categories in the rate reconciliation, and (2) provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold (if the effect of those reconciling items is equal to or greater than 5% of the amount computed by multiplying pretax income/(loss) by the applicable statutory income tax rate). This ASU will be effective, for public entities, for fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. We are currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this ASU on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
3. REVENUE RECOGNITION
We recognize revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." The unit of account in ASC 606 is a performance obligation, which is a promise in a contract with a customer to transfer a good or service to the customer.
The Company further recognized a debit to APIC of $173.9 million as part offollows the elimination of Hoya’s non-controlling interest in Telos ID. The net impact to APIC associated withfive-step model for recognizing revenue that includes identifying the acquisition of the additional 50% interest in Telos ID was a debit of $25.5 million.

On April 11, 2007, Telos ID was formed as a limited liability company under the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act. We contributed substantially all of the assets of our Telos ID Enterprise business line and assigned our rights to perform under our U.S. Government contract with the Defense Manpower Data Center (“DMDC”)customer, determining the performance obligation(s), determining the transaction price, allocating the transaction price to Telos ID at their stated book values. The net book value of assets we contributed totaled $17,000. Until April 19, 2007, we owned 99.999%the performance obligation(s), and recognizing revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied. Timing of the membership interestssatisfaction of Telos IDperformance obligations varies across our businesses due to our diverse product and Hoya owned 0.001%service mix, customer base, and contractual terms. Significant judgment can be required in determining certain performance obligations, and these determinations could change the amount of revenue and profit recorded in a given period. Our contracts may have a single performance obligation or multiple performance obligations. When there are multiple performance obligations within a contract, we allocate the transaction price, net of any discounts, to each performance obligation based on the standalone selling price of the membership interestsproduct or service underlying each performance obligation.
Our contracts with the U.S. government are generally subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation ("FAR") and the price is typically based on estimated or actual costs plus a reasonable profit margin. As such, the standalone selling price of products or services in our contracts with the U.S. government are typically equal to the selling price stated in the contract. For non-U.S. government contracts with multiple performance obligations, standalone selling price is the observable price of a good or service when Telos ID. On April 20, 2007, we sold an additional 39.999%sells that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers.
Contracts are routinely and often modified to account for changes in contract requirements, specifications, quantities, or price. Depending on the nature of the membership interests to Hoya in exchange for $6 million in cash consideration. In accordance with ASC 505, “Equity,”modification, we recognized a gain of $5.8 million. As a result, we owned 60% of Telos ID, and therefore continueddetermine whether to account for the investment in Telos ID usingmodification as an adjustment to the consolidation method.

On December 24, 2014 (the “Closing Date”), we entered intoexisting contract or as a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) between the Company and Hoya, pursuant to which Hoya acquirednew contract. Generally, modifications are not distinct from the Company an additional ten percent (10%) membership interest in Telos ID in exchange for $5 million (the “Transaction”). In connection withexisting contract due to the Transaction, the Company and Hoya entered into the Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement (the “Operating Agreement”) governing the business, allocation of profits and losses and management of Telos ID. Under the Operating Agreement, Telos ID was managed by a board of directors comprised of five (5) members (the “Telos ID Board”). The Operating Agreement provided for two classes of membership units, Class A (owned by the Company) and Class B (owned by Hoya). The Class A member (the Company) owned 50% of Telos ID, was entitled to receive 50%significant interrelatedness of the profits of Telos ID,performance obligations and could appoint three (3) members of the Telos ID Board. The Class B member (Hoya) owned 50% of Telos ID, was entitled to receive 50% of the profits of Telos ID, and could appoint two (2) members of the Telos ID Board.

56

As a result of the 2014 Transaction, the Class A and Class B members each owned 50% of Telos ID,are therefore accounted for as mentioned above, and as such each was allocated 50% of the profits, which was $5.2 million, $4.3 million, and $3.4 million for 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The Class B member was the non-controlling interest.

Distributions were madean adjustment to the members only whenexisting contract, and recognized as a cumulative adjustment to revenue (as either an increase or reduction of revenue) based on the extent determined by Telos ID’s Boardmodification's effect on progress toward completion of Directors, in accordance with the Operating Agreement. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Class B member received a total of $2.8 million, $2.4 million, and $1.7 million, respectively, of such distributions. The Class B member also received a final distribution of $2.4 million in January 2021, which was accrued and presented in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020.performance obligation.

The following table details the changes in non-controlling interestmajority of our revenue is recognized over time, as control is transferred continuously to our customers who receive and consume benefits as we perform. Revenue transferred to customers over time accounted for 84% and 89% of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2023 and 20182022, respectively. All of our business groups earn services revenue under a variety of contract types, including time and materials, firm-fixed price, firm fixed price level of effort, and cost-plus fixed fee contract types, which may include variable consideration.
Revenue is recognized over time using costs incurred to date relative to total estimated costs at completion to measure progress toward satisfying our performance obligations. Incurred cost represents work performed, which corresponds with, and thereby best depicts, the transfer of control to the customer. Contract costs include labor, material, subcontractor costs and indirect expenses. This continuous transfer of control to the customer is supported by clauses in our contracts with U.S. government customers whereby the customer may terminate a contract for convenience and then pay for costs incurred plus a profit, at which time the customer would take control of any work in process. For non-U.S. government contracts where we perform as a subcontractor and our order includes similar FAR provisions as the prime contractor's order from the U.S. government, continuous transfer of control is likewise supported by such provisions. For other non-U.S. government customers, continuous transfer of control to such customers is also supported due to general terms in our contracts and rights to recover damages which would include, among other potential damages, the right to payment for our work performed to date plus a reasonable profit.
For performance obligations in which control does not continuously transfer to the customer, we recognize revenue at the point in time in which each performance obligation is fully satisfied. This coincides with the point in time the customer obtains control of the transferred product or service, which typically occurs upon customer acceptance or receipt of the product or service, given that we maintain control of the product or service until that point. Revenue transferred to customers at a point in time accounted for 16% and 11% of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Orders for the sale of software licenses may contain multiple performance obligations, such as maintenance, training, or consulting services, which are typically delivered over time, consistent with the transfer of control disclosed above for the provision of services. When an order contains multiple performance obligations, we allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations based on the standalone selling price of the product or service underlying each performance obligation. The standalone selling price represents the amount we would sell the product or service to a customer on a standalone basis.
55

Table of Contents
For certain performance obligations where we are not primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise to provide the goods or services to the customer, do not have inventory risk and have limited discretion in establishing the price for the goods or services, we recognize revenue on a net basis.
Contract Estimates
Due to the transfer of control over time, revenue is recognized based on progress towards completion of the performance obligation. The selection of the method to measure progress towards completion requires judgment and is based on the nature of the performance obligations. We generally use the cost-to-cost measure of progress on a proportional performance basis for our long-term contracts because it best depicts the transfer of control to the customer, which occurs as we incur costs on our contracts. Under the cost-to-cost measure of progress, the extent of progress towards completion is measured based on the ratio of costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs at completion of the performance obligation, which includes both the actual costs already incurred and the estimated costs to complete. Revenues are recorded proportionally as costs are incurred. Due to the nature of the work required to be performed on certain of our performance obligations, the estimation of costs at completion is complex, subject to many variables and requires significant judgment. Contract estimates are based on various assumptions, including labor and subcontractor costs, materials and other direct costs and the complexity of the work to be performed. A significant change in one or more of these estimates could affect the profitability of our contracts. We review and update our contract-related estimates regularly and recognize adjustments in estimated profit on contracts on a cumulative catch-up basis, which may result in an adjustment increasing or decreasing revenue to date on a contract in a particular period that the adjustment is identified. Revenue and profit in future periods of contract performance are recognized using the adjusted estimate.
Our contracts may include various types of variable consideration, such as claims (for instance, indirect rate or other equitable adjustments) or incentive fees. We include estimated amounts in the transaction price based on all of the information available to us, including historical information and future estimations, and to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when any uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is resolved. We have revised and re-submitted several years of incurred cost submissions reflecting certain indirect rate structure changes as a result of regular Defense Contract Audit Agency audits of incurred cost submissions. This resulted in signed final rate agreement letters through fiscal year 2022. We evaluated the resulting changes to revenue under the applicable cost-plus fixed fee contracts, as variable consideration, and determined the most likely amount to which we expect to be entitled, to the extent that no constraint exists that would preclude recognizing this revenue or result in a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized. We included these estimated amounts of variable consideration in the transaction price and as performance on these contracts is complete, we adjusted our revenue by $(0.1) million during the year ended December 31, 2023. No revenue adjustment was recorded during fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
We provide for anticipated losses on contracts during the period when the loss is determined by recording an expense for the total expected costs that exceeds the total estimated revenue for a performance obligation. We recorded an immaterial contract loss during the year ended December 31, 2023. No contract loss was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Historically, most of our contracts do not include award or incentive fees. For incentive fees, we would include such fees in the transaction price to the extent we could reasonably estimate the amount of the fee. With limited historical experience, we have not included any revenue related to incentive fees in our estimated transaction prices. We may include in our contract estimates additional revenue for submitted contract modifications or claims against the customer when we believe we have an enforceable right to the modification or claim, the amount can be estimated reliably and its realization is probable. We consider the contractual/legal basis for the claim (in thousands):particular FAR provisions), the facts and circumstances around any additional costs incurred, the reasonableness of those costs and the objective evidence available to support such claims.

For our contracts that have an original duration of one year or less, we use the practical expedient applicable to such contracts and do not consider the time value of money. We capitalize sales commissions related to proprietary software and related services that are directly tied to sales. We do not elect the practical expedient to expense as incurred the incremental costs of obtaining a contract if the amortization period would have been one year or less. For the sales commissions that are capitalized, we amortize the asset over the expected customer life, which is based on recent and historical data.
 2020  2019  2018 
Non-controlling interest, beginning of period $4,514  $2,621  $913 
Net income  5,154   4,264   3,377 
Distributions  (5,179)  (2,371)  (1,669)
Sale of 50% membership interest  (4,489)      
Non-controlling interest, end of period $  $4,514  $2,621 

56

Table of Contents
Disaggregated Revenues
In addition to our segment reporting, as further discussed in Note 3. Goodwill18 – Segment Information, we disaggregate our revenue by customer and contract types. We treat sales to U.S. customers as sales within the U.S. regardless of where the services are performed. Substantially most of our revenues are generated from U.S. customers, while international customers are de minimis, as such the financial information by geographic location is not presented.

Table 3.1: Revenue by Customer Type
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Amount%Amount%
(dollars in thousands)
Federal government$131,143 90%$205,538 95%
State & local government, and commercial14,235 10%11,349 5%
Total revenue$145,378 $216,887 
Table 3.2: Revenue by Contract Type
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Amount%Amount%
(dollars in thousands)
Firm fixed-price$114,188 79%$179,803 83%
Time-and-materials13,535 9%12,963 6%
Cost plus fixed-fee17,655 12%24,121 11%
Total revenue$145,378 $216,887 
Table 3.3: Revenue Concentrations Greater than 10% of Total Revenue
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
U.S. Department of Defense ("DoD")64 %74 %
Table 3.4: Contract Balances
As of December 31,
Balance Sheet Presentation20232022
(in thousands)
Billed account receivables (1)
Accounts receivable, net$17,818 $13,521 
Unbilled account receivablesAccounts receivable, net8,022 11,657 
Contract assetsAccounts receivable, net4,584 14,891 
Contract liabilities - currentContract liabilities6,728 6,444 
(1) Net of allowance for credit losses
The goodwill balance was $14.9 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.  Goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests andchanges in the interim if triggering events are present beforeCompany's contract assets and contract liabilities during the annual tests, we will assess impairment.current period were primarily the result of the timing differences between the Company's performance, invoicing and customer payments. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023 and 2018, no impairment charges were taken.

Note 4. Fair Value Measurements

The accounting standard for fair value measurements provides a framework for measuring fair value2022, the amount of revenue recognized during the year that was included in the opening contract liabilities balance was $5.4 million and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The framework requires the valuation of investments using a three-tiered approach. The statement requires fair value measurement to be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets and liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; or

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported by little or no market activity).

$5.2 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019,2023, we did not have any financial instruments with significant Level 3 inputs andhad approximately $52.1 million of remaining performance obligations, which we did not have any financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

As of December 31, 2019, the carrying value of the Company’s 12% Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Public Preferred Stock”) was $139.2 million, and the estimated fair market value was $60.5 million, based on quoted market prices.

For certainalso refer to as funded backlog. We expect to recognize approximately 90% of our non-derivative financial instruments, including receivables, accounts payableremaining performance obligations as revenue in 2024, and other accrued liabilities,approximately 3% by 2025, with the carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

remainder recognized thereafter.
57
57

Table of Contents
Note 5. Revenue and Accounts Receivable4. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET

Table 4.1: Details of Accounts Receivable, Net
As of December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Billed accounts receivables$18,101 $13,655 
Unbilled accounts receivable8,022 11,657 
Contract assets4,584 14,891 
Allowance for credit losses(283)(134)
   Accounts receivable, net$30,424 $40,069 
Revenue resulting from contracts and subcontracts with the U.S. Government accounted for 95.4%, 93.7%, and 93.7% of consolidated revenue in 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. As our primary customer base includes agencies of the U.S. Government,government, we have a concentration of credit risk associated with our accounts receivable, as 96.1%91% of our billed and unbilled accounts receivable, as of December 31, 2023, were directly with U.S. Governmentgovernment customers. While we acknowledge the potentially material and adverse risk of such a significant concentration of credit risk, our past experience of collecting substantially all of such receivables provideprovides us with an informed basis that such risk, if any, is manageable. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of all of our customers and generally do not require collateral or other guaranteeguarantees from our customers. We maintain allowances for potential losses.

Table 4.2: Allowance for Credit Losses Activities
Balance Beginning
of Year
Bad Debt
Expenses (1)
Write-Offs / Recoveries (2)
Balance
End
of Year
(in thousands)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023$134 $152 $(3)$283 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022116 99 (81)134 
(1) Accounts receivable reserves and reversals of allowance for subsequent collection, net
(2) Accounts receivable written-off and subsequent recoveries, net
On July 15, 2016, the Company entered into an accounts receivable purchase agreement under which the Company could sell certain accounts receivable (balance not to exceed $10.0 million) to a third party, or the Factor"Factor", without recourse to the Company. The Factor initially paid the Company, 90% of U.S. Federal government receivables or 85% of certain commercial prime contractors’ receivables that were sold under the agreement. The remaining payment was deferredwith an availability period through June 30, 2022, and based on the amount the Factor received from our customer, less a discount fee and a program access fee that was determinedyear to year thereafter unless terminated in writing by the amount of time the receivable was outstanding before payment. The structure of the transaction provided for a true sale of the receivables transferred. Accordingly, upon transfer of the receivable to the Factor, the receivable was removed from the Company's consolidated balance sheet, a loss on the sale was recorded and the residual amount remains a deferred payment as an accounts receivable until payment was received from the Factor.  The balance of the sold receivables could not exceed $10 million.parties. There were no accounts receivable sold during 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company sold approximately $12.6 million of accounts receivable,2023 and recognized a related loss of approximately $0.1 million in selling, general and administrative expenses for the same period.2022, respectively. As of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, there were no outstanding sold accounts receivable.

5. INVENTORIES, NET
Table 5.1: Details of Inventories, Net
As of December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Gross inventory$2,179 $3,642 
Allowance for inventory obsolescence(759)(765)
Inventories, net$1,420 $2,877 
6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Table 6.1: Details of Property and Equipment, Net
As of December 31, 2023As of December 31, 2022
Gross Carrying AmountAccumulated Depreciation and AmortizationNet Carrying ValueGross Carrying AmountAccumulated Depreciation and AmortizationNet Carrying Value
(in thousands)
Furniture and equipment$16,213 $(13,363)$2,850 $16,033 $(11,900)$4,133 
Leasehold improvement3,211 (2,604)607 $3,145 (2,491)654 
Total$19,424 $(15,967)$3,457 $19,178 $(14,391)$4,787 
The components of accounts receivable and contract assets are as follows (in thousands):

 December 31, 
  
2020
  
2019
 
Billed accounts receivable $12,060  $11,917 
Unbilled receivables  19,161   16,745 
Allowance for doubtful accounts  (308)  (720)
Total $30,913  $27,942 

58

The activities in the allowance for doubtful accounts are set forth below (in thousands):

 
Balance Beginning
of Year
  
Bad Debt
Expenses (1)
  
Recoveries (2)
  
Balance
End
of Year
 
             
Year Ended December 31, 2020 $720  $(412) $  $308 
Year Ended December 31, 2019 $306  $414  $  $720 
Year Ended December 31, 2018 $411  $(105) $  $306 

(1)Accounts receivable reserves and reversal of allowance for subsequent collections, net
(2)Accounts receivable written-off and subsequent recoveries, net

Revenue by Major Market and Significant Customers

We derived a substantial portion of our revenues from contracts and subcontracts with the U.S. Government. Revenue by customer sector for the last three fiscal years is as follows:

 2020  2019  2018 
        (dollar amounts in thousands)       
                   
Federal $171,677   95.4% $149,257   93.7% $129,279   93.7%
State & Local, and Commercial  8,240   4.6%  9,961   6.3%  8,737   6.3%
Total $179,917   100.0% $159,218   100.0% $138,016   100.0%

58

Table 6.2: Depreciation and Amortization Expense
For the year ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Depreciation and amortization$2,230 $2,367 
7. GOODWILL
As discussed in Note 6. Current Liabilities2 Significant Accounting Policies, we reported two operating and Debt Obligationsreportable segments: Security Solutions and Secure Networks. The two operating and reportable segments represent the reporting units for purposes of testing goodwill.

Accounts Payable and Other Accrued  Liabilities
AsThe goodwill balance was $17.9 million as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, of which $3.0 million is allocated to the accounts payableSecurity Solutions segment and other accrued payables consisted of $14.7$14.9 million is allocated to the Secure Networks segment.
The net assets attributable to the reporting units are determined based upon the estimated assets and $13.6 million, respectively,liabilities attributable to the reporting units in trade account payables and $6.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively, in accrued liabilities.deriving its free cash flows.

Contract Liabilities 
Contract liabilities are payments received in advance and milestone payments from our customers on selected contracts that exceed revenue earned to date, resulting in contract liabilities. Contract liabilities typically are not consideredFor fiscal year 2023, we performed a significant financing component because they are generally satisfied within one year and are used to meet working capital demands that can be higher in the early stages of a contract. Contract liabilities are reportedqualitative assessment on our consolidated balance sheetsreporting units and identified that it is "more-likely-than-not" that the estimated fair value of our Security Solutions reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. In contrast, based on the initial qualitative assessment of our Secure Networks reporting unit, we determined that it is not "more-likely-than-not" that the fair value of this reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, therefore we performed a net contract basis atquantitative impairment test. Based on the end of eachquantitative assessment on our Secure Networks reporting period. Asunit as of December 31, 20202023, the estimated fair value exceeded its carrying value.
Based on the results of our annual impairment test of goodwill performed, the estimated fair value of our respective reporting units exceeded their respective carrying value, and 2019,no impairment charges were taken during the contract liabilities primarilyyears ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
8. INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Table 8.1: Details of Intangible Assets, Net
Estimated useful lifeAs of December 31, 2023As of December 31, 2022
Gross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationNet Carrying ValueGross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationNet Carrying Value
(in thousands)
Acquired technology8 years$3,630 $(1,097)$2,533 $3,630 $(643)$2,987 
Customer relationships3 years40 (32)40 (19)21 
Software development costs2 - 5 years35,312 (12,256)23,056 26,956 (7,793)19,163 
Subtotal38,982 (13,385)25,597 30,626 (8,455)22,171 
In-process software development costs (1) (2)
14,019 — 14,019 8,124 — 8,124 
Software held for resale (3)
— — — 7,120 — 7,120 
Total$53,001 $(13,385)$39,616 $45,870 $(8,455)$37,415 
(1) In-process software development costs are costs for software that is not yet available for its intended use or general release to customers as of balance sheet date, thus not yet amortized.
(2) An impairment charge of $0.5 million was recorded against software development costs in fiscal year 2023 related to the write-off of certain software projects.
(3) This amount is net of $0.7 million charged into cost of sales in fiscal year 2022.
In 2023, as a result of the impairment assessment, the Company identified conditions demonstrating impairment of certain software development costs and an impairment charge of $0.5 million was recorded under "Research and Development" expenses in the Company's consolidated statements of operations. No similar impairment charge was recorded on software development costs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
The Company did not recognize any impairment charges on other intangible assets for the periods presented.
59

Table of Contents
Table 8.2: Amortization Expense
For the year ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Amortization expense related to:
Software development costs - cost of sales (1)
$2,840 $— 
Software development costs - research and development1,623 1,362 
Other intangible assets - general and administrative467 401 
Total$4,930 $1,763 
(1) Amortization expense for software development costs related to product support services.assets to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed are charged under cost of sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Table 8.3: Estimated Future Amortization Expense of Intangible Assets, Net
As of December 31, 2023
(in thousands)
Year Ending December 31, 2024$8,037 
Year Ending December 31, 20257,270 
Year Ending December 31, 20264,864 
Year Ending December 31, 20273,520 
Year Ending December 31, 20281,642 
Thereafter264 
Total (1)
$25,597 
Enlightenment Capital(1) This does not include amortization of in-process software development costs, as estimation of the timing of future amortization expenses would be impractical.
Actual amortization expense in future periods could differ from these estimates as a result of impairments, future releases, future acquisitions, divestitures, and other factors.
9. OTHER BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS
Table 9.1: Details of Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities
As of December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Accounts payable$8,307 $12,606 
Accrued payables5,443 9,945 
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities$13,750 $22,551 
Table 9.2: Details of Other Current Liabilities
As of December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Other accrued liabilities1,427 1,530 
Restructuring expenses accrual400 2,763 
Other497 626 
Other current liabilities$2,324 $4,919 
60

Table of Contents
10. DEBT AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS
Revolving Credit AgreementFacility
On January 25, 2017,December 30, 2022 (the "Closing Date"), we entered into a Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with Enlightenment Capital, by and among the Company, as borrower, Xacta Corporation, ubIQuity.com,inc, Teloworks, Inc., and Telos Identity Management Solutions, Fund II, L.P.,LLC, as agent (the "Agent") andguarantors, the lenders party thereto (the "Lenders") (together referenced, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., as “EnCap”administrative agent for the Lenders (in such capacity, the "Agent"). The Credit Agreement providedprovides for an $11a $30.0 million senior term loan (the "Loan")secured revolving credit facility with a maturity date of January 25, 2022,December 30, 2025, with the option of issuing letters of credit thereunder with a sub-limit of $5.0 million, and with an uncommitted expansion feature of up to $30.0 million of additional revolver capacity (the "Loan"). The Loan is subject to acceleration in the event of customary events of default. The Company has not drawn any amount under the Loan.

All borrowingsBorrowings under the Credit Agreement accruedwill accrue interest, at our option, at one of three variable rates, plus a specified margin. We can elect to borrow at (i) the rateAlternative Base Rate, plus 0.9%; (ii) Adjusted Daily Simple Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR"), plus 1.9%; and (iii) Adjusted Term SOFR, plus 1.9%, as such capitalized terms are defined and calculated in the Credit Agreement. The Company may elect to convert borrowings from one type of 13.0%borrowing to another type per annum (the “Accrual Rate”). If, at the requestterms of the Company, the Agent executed an intercreditor agreement with another senior lender under which the Agent and the Lenders subordinate their liens (an "Alternative Interest Rate Event"), the interest rate would increase to 14.5% per annum.Credit Agreement. After the occurrence and during the continuance of any event of default, the interest rate wouldmay increase by an additional 2.0%. The Company wasWe are obligated to pay accrued interest in cash(i) with respect to amounts accruing interest based on a monthly basis at a rate of not less than 10.0% per annum or, during the continuance of an Alternate InterestAlternative Base Rate, Event, 11.5% per annum. The Company may electeach calendar quarter and on the maturity date, (ii) with respect to pay the remainingamounts accruing interest in cash, by payment-in-kind (by addition to the principal amountbased on Adjusted Daily Simple SOFR, on each one month anniversary of the Loan)borrowing and on the maturity date, and (iii) with respect to amounts accruing interest based on Adjusted Term SOFR, at the end of the period specified per the Credit Agreement and on the maturity date. Upon five, three, or by combination of cash and payment-in-kind. Upon thirty daysone days' prior written notice, the Companyas applicable, we may prepay any portion or the entire amount of the Loan. We paid and could pay costs and customary fees, including a closing fee, commitment fees and letter of credit participation fee, if any, payable to the Agent and Lenders, as applicable, in connection with the Loan.

The Loan under the Credit Agreement is collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets, including the Company's pledge of its domestic and material foreign subsidiary equity interests.
The Loan has various covenants that may, among other things, affect our ability to create, incur, assume or suffer any indebtedness, merge into or consolidate with another entity, acquire entity interests, sell or transfer certain assets, enter into certain arrangements (such as sale and leaseback and swap agreements) or restrictive agreements, pay dividends and make certain restricted payments, and amend material documents related to any subordinated indebtedness and corporate agreements. The Credit Agreement contained representations, warranties,also requires certain financial covenants terms and conditions customary for transactionsto maintain a Senior Leverage Ratio on the last day of this type. In connectionany fiscal quarter, no greater than 3 to 1. We were in compliance with the Credit Agreement, the Agent had been granted, for the benefitall covenants as of the Lenders, a security interest in and general lien upon various property of the Company, subject to certain permitted liens and any intercreditor agreement. December 31, 2023.
The occurrence of an event of default under the Credit Agreement could result in the Loan and other obligations becoming immediately due and payable and allow the Lenders to exercise all rights and remedies available to them under the Credit Agreement or as a secured party under the UCC, in addition to all other rights and remedies available to them.

In connection with the Credit Agreement, on January 25, 2017, the Company issued warrants (each, a "Warrant") to the Agent and certain of the Lenders representing in the aggregate the right to purchase in accordance with their terms 900,970 shares of the Class A Common Stock of the Company, no par value per share, which was equivalent to approximately 2.5% of the common equity interests of the Company on a fully diluted basis. The exercise price as $1.665 per share and each Warrant would expire on January 25, 2027. The value of the warrants was determined to be de minimis and no value was allocated to them on a relative fair value basis in accounting for the debt instrument.

The Credit Agreement also included an $825,000 exit fee, which was payable upon any repayment or prepayment of the loan. This amount had been included in the total principal due and treated as an unamortized discount on the debt, which would be amortized over the term of the loan, using the effective interest method at a rate of 15.0%. We incurred fees and transaction costs of approximately $374,000 related to the issuance of the Credit Agreement, which are being amortized over the life of the Credit Agreement.

On March 30, 2018, the Credit Agreement was further amended (the “Third Amendment”) to waive certain covenant defaults and to reset the covenants for 2018 measurement periods to more accurately reflect the Company’s projected performance for the year. The measurement against the covenants for consolidated leverage ratio and consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio were agreed to not be measured as of December 31, 2017 and were reset for 2018 measurement periods. Additionally, a minimum revenue covenant and a net working capital covenant were added. In consideration of these amendments, the interest rate on the loan was increased by 1%, which would revert back to the original rate upon achievement of two consecutive quarters of a specified fixed charge coverage ratio as defined in the agreement.  The Company may elect to pay the increase in interest expense in cash or by payment-in-kind (by addition to the principal amount of the Loan). The increase in interest expense had been paid in cash. Contemporaneously with the Third Amendment, Mr. John B. Wood agreed to transfer 50,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock owned by him to EnCap.

59

Table of Contents
On July 19, 2019, we entered into the Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Waiver; First Amendment to Fee Letter (“Fourth Amendment”) to amend the Credit Agreement.  As a result of the Fourth Amendment, several terms of the Credit Agreement were amended, including the following:
The Company borrowed an additional $5 million from the Lenders, increasing the total amount of the principal to $16 million.
The maturity date ofApril 12, 2023, the Credit Agreement was amended to exclude from January 25, 2022collateral the (i) amount collectible from a third party related to January 15, 2021.an Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement and (ii) receivables generated by the Company from the sale of goods supplied to this third party in an amount not to exceed $25.0 million.
Other Financing Obligations
We entered into a Master Purchase Agreement ("MPA") with a third-party buyer ("Buyer") for $9.1 million ("Assignment Price") relating to software licenses under a specific delivery order ("DO") with our customer resulting in proceeds from other financing obligations of $9.1 million in November 2022. Under the MPA, we sold, assigned and transferred all of our rights, title and interest in (i) the DO payments from the customer and (ii) the underlying licenses. The prepayment price was amended as follows: (a) from January 26, 2019DO covers a base period with an option for the customer to exercise three (3) additional 12-month periods through January 25, 2020,2026. The DO payments assigned to the prepayment price was 102%Buyer are billable to the customer at the beginning of the principal amount, (b) from January 26, 2020 through October 14, 2020,base period and for each option year exercised. The underlying licenses were acquired for resale, see Note 8 – Intangible Assets, net for further details.
On February 9, 2023, the prepayment price was 101%customer notified us that it would not exercise the first option period under the DO. The MPA provides that, if the customer terminates the DO for non-renewal and the Buyer reasonably concludes that the customer's actions constitute grounds for filing a claim with the customer's contracting officer, Buyer and Telos will cooperate in preparing such a claim, which would be filed in Telos' name. Buyer has notified Telos of its intent to pursue a claim against the customer.
61

Table of Contents
Concurrently, the Company transferred all the rights, title and interest in the underlying licenses in exchange for the extinguishment of the principal amount, and (c) from October 15, 2020 tooutstanding financing obligations. The Company evaluated the maturity date,transfer of the prepayment price would be at par.  However, the prepayment priceunderlying licenses as consideration paid for the additional $5 million loan attributable tooutstanding financing obligations under ASC 470-10, Debt, and the Fourth Amendment would be at par.
The following financial covenants, as defined in the Credit Agreement, were amended and updated: Consolidated Leverage Ratio, Consolidated Senior Leverage Ratio, Consolidated Capital Expenditures, Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, and Minimum Consolidated Net Working Capital.
Any actual or potential non-compliance with the applicable provisions of the Credit Agreement were waived.
The borrowing underMPA, and concluded that the Credit Agreement continued to be collateralized by substantially alltransaction resulted in an extinguishment of the Company’s assets including inventory, equipment and accounts receivable.
debt. The Company paidrecorded the Agent a fee of $110,000 in connection withdifference between the Fourth Amendment. We incurred immaterial third party transaction costs which were expensed in the current period.
The exit fee was increased from $825,000 to $1,200,000.

The exit fee had been included in the total principal due and treated as an unamortized discount on the debt, which was amortized over the term of the loan using the effective interest method at a rate of 17.3% over the remaining term of the loan.

On March 26, 2020, the Credit Agreement was amended (the “Fifth Amendment”) to modify the financial covenants for 2020 through the maturity of the Credit Agreement to establish that the covenants would remain at the December 31, 2019 levels and to update the previously agreed-upon definition of certain financial covenants, specifically the amount of Capital Expenditures to be included in the measurement of the covenants.  The Fifth Amendment also provided for the right for the Company to elect to extend the maturity date of the Credit Agreement which was scheduled to mature on January 15, 2021. The Fifth Amendment provided for four quarterly maturity date extensions, which would increase the Exit Fee payable under the Credit Agreement by $250,000 for each quarterly maturity date extension elected, for a total of $1 million increase to the Exit Fee were all four of the maturity date extensions to be elected.  The Company paid EnCap an amendment fee of $100,000 and out-of-pocket costs and expenses in consideration for the Fifth Amendment.

We incurred interest expense in the amount of $2.7 million, $2.2 million and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, under the Credit Agreement.

On November 24, 2020, upon the closing of the IPO, the Company paid a total of $17.4 million which paid off the Credit Agreement in full including an exit fee of $1.2 million, accrued interest of $138,000, and legal fees of $13,000. As a result, we recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $138,000 presented as a part of the non-operating expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Subordinated Debt
On March 31, 2015, the Company entered into Subordinated Loan Agreements and Subordinated Promissory Notes (“Porter Notes”) with affiliated entities of Mr. John R. C. Porter (together referenced as “Porter”).  Mr. Porter and Toxford Corporation, of which Mr. Porter is the sole shareholder, owned 35.0% of our Class A Common Stock. Under the terms of the Porter Notes, Porter lent the Company $2.5 million on or about March 31, 2015. Telos also entered into Subordination and Intercreditor Agreements (the “Subordination Agreements”) with Porter and a prior senior lender, in which the Porter Notes were fully subordinated to the financing provided by that senior lender, and payments under the Porter Notes were permitted only if certain conditions are met. According to the original terms of the Porter Notes, the outstanding principal sum bore interest at the fixed rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum which would be payable in arrears in cash on the 20th day of each May, August, November and February, with the first interest payment date due on August 20, 2015. The Porter Notes did not call for amortization payments and were unsecured. The Porter Notes, in whole or in part, may be repaid at any time without premium or penalty. The unpaid principal, together with interest, was originally due and payable in full on July 1, 2017. 

On April 18, 2017, we amended and restated the Porter Notes to reduce the interest rate from twelve percent (12%) to six percent (6%) per annum, to be accrued, and extended the maturity date from July 1, 2017 to July 25, 2022. Telos also entered into Intercreditor Agreements with Porter and EnCap, in which the Porter Notes were fully subordinated to the Credit Agreement and any subsequent senior lenders, and payments under the Porter Notes were permitted only if certain conditions were met. As a result of the amendment and restatement of the Porter Notes, we recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of approximately $1 million, which consisted of the remeasurement of the debt at fair value. As the extinguishment was with a related party, the transaction was deemed to be a capital transaction and the gain was recorded in the Company’s stockholders’ deficit as of December 31, 2017. All other terms remained in full force and effect. We incurred interest expense in the amount of $319,000, $330,000, and $308,000 for 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively, on the Porter Notes.

On November 23, 2020, upon the closing of the IPO, the Porter Notes were paid in full.

60

Note 7. Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock Conversion

Public Preferred Stock
Upon the closing of the IPO, which constituted a qualified initial public offering for the purposes of the terms of the Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock, each issued and outstanding share of Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock automatically was converted (the “ERPS Conversion”) into the right to receive (i) an amount of cash equal to (I) the ERPS Liquidation Value; multiplied by (II) 0.90; multiplied by (III) 0.85 and (ii) that number of shares of common stock (valued at the initial offering price to the public) equal to (I) the ERPS Liquidation Value; multiplied by (II) 0.90; multiplied by (III) 0.15. No fractional shares of common stock, however, were issued upon an ERPS Conversion Event but, in lieu thereof, the holder was entitled to receive an amount of cash equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock (valued at the initial offering price to the public) at the time of such ERPS Conversion Event multiplied by such fractional amount (rounded to the nearest cent). “ERPS Liquidation Value” means, per each share of Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock, $10 together with all accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not earned or declared) thereon calculated as of the actual date of an ERPS Conversion Event without interest, which, was approximately $142.3 million as of November 19, 2020. All shares of common stock issued upon an ERPS Conversion were validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. On November 23, 2020, holders of Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock received $108.9 million in cash and 1.1 million shares of our common stock at $17 per share for a total value of $19.2 million in connection with the ERPS Conversion. The difference in the redemptioncarrying value of the ERPSCompany's debt instrument and the carrying value has been accounted forunderlying licenses as a gain on early extinguishment of debt in accordance with ASC 470 and ASC 480.  Approximately $220,000 of costs directly attributable to this redemption were applied against the gain, resulting inother financing obligations. The Company reported a net gain of $14.0 million.

A maximum of 6,000,000 shares of the Public Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, had been authorized for issuance. We initially issued 2,858,723 shares of the Public Preferred Stock pursuant to the acquisition of the Company during fiscal year 1990. The Public Preferred Stock was recorded at fair value on the date of original issue, November 21, 1989, and we made periodic accretions under the interest method of the excess of the redemption value over the recorded value. We adjusted our estimate of accrued accretion in the amount of $1.5$1.4 million, in the second quarter of 2006.  The Public Preferred Stock was fully accreted as of December 2008.  We declared stock dividends totaling 736,863 shares in 1990 and 1991. Since 1991, no other dividends, in stock or cash, have been declared. In November 1998, we retired 410,000 shares of the Public Preferred Stock. The total number of shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019, was 3,185,586. The Public Preferred Stock was quoted as “TLSRP” on the OTCQB marketplace and the OTC Bulletin Board.

Since 1991, no dividends were declared or paid on our Public Preferred Stock, based upon our interpretation of restrictions in our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, limitations in the terms of the Public Preferred Stock instrument, specific dividend payment restrictions in the various financing agreements to which the Public Preferred Stock is subject, other senior obligations currently or previously in existence, and Maryland law limitations in existence prior to October 1, 2009. Subsequent to the 2009 Maryland law change, dividend payments continue to be prohibited except under certain specific circumstances as set forth in Maryland Code Section 2-311, which the Company did not satisfy as of the measurement dates. Pursuant to the terms of the Articles of Amendment and Restatement, we were scheduled, but not required, to redeem the Public Preferred Stock in five annual tranches during the period 2005 through 2009. However, due to our substantial senior obligations currently or previously in existence, limitations set forth in the covenants in the Credit Agreement and the Porter Notes, foreseeable capital and operational requirements, and restrictions and prohibitions of our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, we were unable to meet the redemption schedule set forth in the terms of the Public Preferred Stock as of the measurement dates. Moreover, the Public Preferred Stock was not payable on demand, nor callable, for failure to redeem the Public Preferred Stock in accordance with the redemption schedule set forth in the instrument. Therefore, we classified these securities as noncurrent liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019.

We paid dividends on the Public Preferred Stock when and if declared by the Board of Directors. The Public Preferred Stock accrued a semi-annual dividend at the annual rate of 12% ($1.20) per share, based on the liquidation preference of $10 per share, and was fully cumulative. Dividends in additional shares of the Public Preferred Stock for 1990 and 1991 were paid at the rate of 6% per share for each $.60 of such dividends not paid in cash. For the cash dividends payable since December 1, 1995, we had accrued $107.4 million as of December 31, 2019. We accrued dividends on the Public Preferred Stock of $3.4 million $3.8 million and $3.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively, which was recorded as interest expense. Prior to"Other income" in the effective dateConsolidated Statements of ASC 480 on July 1, 2003, such dividends were charged to stockholders’ accumulated deficit.

Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock
The Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock was senior to all other outstanding equity ofOperations during the Company, including the Public Preferred Stock. The Series A-1 ranked on a parity with the Series A-2. The components of the authorized Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock were 1,250 shares of Series A-1 and 1,750 shares of Series A-2 Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock, each with $.01 par value. The Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock carried a cumulative per annum dividend rate of 14.125% of its liquidation value of $1,000 per share. The dividends were payable semiannually on June 30 andyear ended December 31, of each year. We had not declared dividends on our Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock since its issuance, other than in connection with2023. No gain was reported for the redemptions from 2010 to 2013. The liquidation preference of the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock was the face amount of the Series A-1 and A-2 ($1,000 per share), plus all accrued and unpaid dividends.fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.

6111. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Due to the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Porter Notes, other senior obligations currently or previously in existence, the Senior Redeemable PreferredCapital Stock and applicable provisions of Maryland law governing the payment of distributions, we had been precluded from redeeming the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock and paying any accrued and unpaid dividends on the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock, other than the redemptions that occurred from 2010 to 2013. In addition, certain holders of the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock had entered into standby agreements whereby, among other things, those holders would not demand any payments in respect of dividends or redemptions of their instruments and the maturity dates of the instruments have been extended.

In accordance with the requirements of the Second Amendment to the EnCap Credit Agreement, we redeemed all outstanding shares of the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock on April 18, 2017 for $2.1 million.

Note 8. Stockholders' Deficit and Employee Benefit Plan

General
Our authorized capital stock consists of 250,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. Prior to our Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, which were effective November 12, 2020, the relative rights, preferences, and limitations of the Class A common stock and the Class B common stock were in all respects identical. The holders of the common stock had one vote for each share of common stock held. Our Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation authorize our Board of Directors to classify or reclassify shares of our stock in one or more classes or series, to cause the issuance of additional shares of our stock, and to amend our charter without stockholder approval to increase or decrease the number of shares of stock that we have authority to issue. On November 12, 2020, we filed Articles of Amendment (the “Articles”) with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of the State of Maryland, effective as of the same date (the “Effective Time”). The Articles amend the Company’s charter to effect a reverse stock split such that (1) every 1.259446 shares of Class A Common Stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time were changed into one issued and outstanding share of Class A Common Stock, and (2) every 1.259446 shares of Class B Common Stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time were changed into one issued and outstanding share of Class B Common Stock. Also on November 12, 2020, we filed the Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement (the “Second Amended Articles”) with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of the State of Maryland, effective as of the same date (the “Effective Time”). The Second Amended Articles amend the Company’s charter to effect a conversion of each share of the Class B Common Stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time into one fully paid and nonassessable share of Class A Common Stock. From and after the Effective Time, certificates representing the Class B Common Stock now represent the number of shares of Class A Common Stock in which such Class B Common Stock was converted. Also at the Effective Time, the Class A Common Stock was renamed and redesignated as common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Corporation. 

As of December 31, 2020,2023 and 2022, there were 64,625,07170,239,890 and 67,431,632 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, andrespectively. There were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.issued and outstanding on either date.

Shares Repurchases
On May 24, 2022, the Company announced that the Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase program ("SRP") authorizing the Company to repurchase up to $50.0 million of its common stock. Pursuant to this authorization, the Company may repurchase shares of its common stock on a discretionary basis from time to time through open market purchases. The repurchase program has no expiration date and may be modified, suspended, or terminated at any time. As of December 31, 2023, there was $38.7 million of the remaining authorization for future common stock repurchases under the SRP.
Table 11.1: Share Repurchase Program Activity
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands, except per share and share data)
Amounts paid for shares repurchased (1) (2)
$— $11,284 
Number of shares repurchased— 1,550,162 
Average per share price paid (1)
$— $7.28 
(1) Includes commission paid for repurchases on the open market.
(2) Includes $0.1 million of unpaid common stock repurchased paid in fiscal year 2023.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Table 11.2: Details of Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss by Category
Foreign currency translation adjustmentActuarial gain on pension liability adjustmentTotal
(in thousands)
Balance as of December 31, 2021$(134)$107 $(27)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassification(28)— (28)
Balance as of December 31, 2022(162)107 (55)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassification(5)— (5)
Balance as of December 31, 2023$(167)$107 $(60)
12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
In October 2020, the Company amended the 2016 LTIP to increase the total number of shares available for issuance from 4,500,000 to 9,400,000 (equivalent to 7,459,913 shares after the stock split in November 2020) and extended the term to September 30, 2030. On May 8, 2023, the Company further amended the 2016 LTIP with an additional 6,000,000 shares available for issuance, increasing the total number of shares available to 13,459,913. As of December 31, 2023, approximately 4.8 million shares of our common stock were reserved for future grants under the 2016 LTIP, as amended.
The Company records stock-based compensation related to accrued compensation in which it intends to settle in shares of the Company's common stock. However, it is the Company's discretion whether this compensation will ultimately be paid in stock or cash, as it has the right to dictate the form of these payments up until the date they are paid.
62

Table of Contents
Stock-based compensation expense recognized for restricted stock units and stock options granted to employees and non-employees is included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, stock-based compensation expense includes an immaterial increase of $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, to correct a prior period error. There were no income tax benefits recognized on the stock-based compensation expense for these periods.
Table 12.1: Details of Stock-based Compensation Expense
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Cost of sales - services$900 $3,497 
Sales and marketing188 4,668 
Research and development1,989 3,806 
General and administrative (1)
21,319 52,689 
Total$24,396 $64,660 
(1) Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options was $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. There was no similar stock-based compensation expense on stock options in fiscal year 2022.
Restricted Stock Grants
Since June 2008, we have issued restricted stock
Table 12.2: Restricted Stock Unit Activity
Service-Based RSUPerformance-Based RSUTotalWeighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested outstanding units as of December 31, 20223,570,082 336,785 3,906,867 $19.53 
Granted1,888,689 — 1,888,689 2.17 
Vested(2,910,645)— (2,910,645)19.04 
Forfeited(415,513)(292,985)(708,498)19.11 
Unvested outstanding units as of December 31, 20232,132,613 43,800 2,176,413 $5.07 
Our key assumptions used to our executive officers, directors and employees. Such stock is subject to a vesting schedule as follows: 25%calculate the grant date fair value of the restrictedPSU awards include a performance period ranging from 2.45 to 2.92 years, expected volatility between 57.4% - 58.8%, and a risk-free rate of 0.18% - 0.29%. The fair value at the grant date and derived service periods calculated for these market condition PSUs were $19.12 - $30.84 and between 0.38 - 0.76 years, respectively.
As of December 31, 2023, the intrinsic value of the RSUs and PSUs outstanding, exercisable, and vested or expected to vest was $7.9 million. There was $3.5 million of total compensation costs related to stock-based awards not yet recognized as of December 31, 2023, which is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average remaining vesting period of 0.5 years.
Stock Options
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the estimated fair value of stock vests immediatelyoptions on the date of grant, thereafter,grant. Option awards are generally granted with an additional 25% will vest annually onexercise price equal to the anniversarymarket price of the Company's stock at the date of grant subjectgrant. The following weighted-average assumptions are used in the Black-Scholes valuation model to continued employment or services. Inestimate the eventfair value of deathstock option awards, as granted.
Expected term of the employee or a changeoption – For options granted to employees and directors, the Company estimates the term over which option holders are expected to hold their stock option by using the "simplified method" in control, as defined by the Telos Corporation 2008 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, the 2013 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, all unvested shares shall automatically vest in full. In accordance with ASC 718, we recorded immaterial compensation expenseStaff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 107, Share-Based Payments, and SAB No. 110, Simplified Method for anyPlain Vanilla Share Options, to calculate the expected term of stock options determined to be "plain vanilla." The Company's stock option exercise history does not provide a reasonable basis to compute the expected term for stock options. Under this approach, the expected term is presumed to be a midpoint between the vesting date and the contractual end of the issuancesstock option grant. For options granted to non-employees, the Company elected to use the contractual term as the expected term.
Risk-free interest rate – Based on the daily yield curve rates for U.S. Treasury obligations with terms that approximate the expected term of the stock options.
Expected volatility – Due to the absence of the Company's historical price volatility for the expected contractual term of the stock options, the Company utilized the historical price volatility of a peer group.
Expected dividend yield – The Company has not declared dividends, nor does it expect to in the foreseeable future. Therefore, a zero value was assumed for the expected dividend yield.
63

Table of Contents
Table 12.3: Stock Options Fair Value and Weighted-Average Assumptions
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Weighted-average fair value of underlying stock options$1.06$—
Expected term (in years)5.5 - 100
Risk-free interest rate3.5%—%
Expected volatility30.7% - 35.1%—%
Expected dividend yield—%—%
Table 12.4: Stock Option Activity
Stock Options OutstandingWeighted-Average Exercise PriceWeighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in years)
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding option balance as of December 31, 2022— $— 0.0$— 
Granted400,000 1.80 
Exercised— — 
Forfeited, cancelled, or expired— — 
Outstanding option balance as of December 31, 2023400,000 $1.80 9.4$740,000 
Exercisable stock option as of December 31, 2023— $— 0.0$— 
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying stock option awards and the quoted closing price of the Company's common stock as of December 31, 2023.
The fair value of the common stock was nominal, basedoptions is expensed on a straight-line basis over the deductionvesting period of our outstanding debt, capital lease obligations, and preferredone year, including the stock from an estimated enterprise value, which was estimated based on discounted cash flow analysis, comparable public company analysis, and comparable transaction analysis. Additionally, we determined that a significant change inoptions granted to directors, as the valuation estimate for common stock would not have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, we issued grants of 3,972,007 sharesnext annual stockholders meeting is expected to our executive officers and employees.  The shares vest according to the schedule set forth above. There were 3,948,199 shares outstandingoccur at the beginning of 2018, and 43,649 shares were forfeited during 2018.  There were no new grants in 2018. There were 3,904,550 shares outstanding at the beginning of 2019, and 11,904 shares were forfeited during 2019.  There were no new grants in 2019. At the beginning of 2020 there were 3,892,646 shares outstanding and 47,616 were forfeited prior to May 2020, when the remaining 3,845,030 shares became fully vested.  Upon vesting there were no remaining restrictions on these shares and they are able to be sold or disposed of, subject to any lock-up agreements subsequently entered into by certain holders of the shares in connection with the IPO of the Company’s common stock in November 2020.same approximate time each year.

In May 2020, 79,361 shares were granted. As of December 31, 2020,2023, there were 59,521 sharesapproximately $0.1 million of restrictedunrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock options.
13. LEASES
We lease office space facilities and equipment under non-cancelable operating and finance leases with various expiration dates, some of which contain renewal options. The Company's lease portfolio is comprised of two major classes. The lease of the Ashburn facility is accounted for as a finance lease. The other office spaces and equipment leased are accounted for as operating leases. We have included options to extend in the operating lease ROU assets and liabilities when we are reasonably certain that remained subject to vesting.we will exercise such options.

In May 2014, the Company entered into a new lease arrangement with the new landlord on the Ashburn facility, which expires on May 28, 2029. In accordance with this lease agreement, the basic rent increases by a fixed 2.5% escalation annually.
Table 13.1: Details of Lease Costs
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Operating lease cost$541 $550 
Short-term lease cost (1)
55 49 
Finance lease cost
Amortization of finance lease assets1,221 1,221 
Interest on finance lease liabilities611 688 
Total finance lease cost1,832 1,909 
Total lease costs$2,428 $2,508 
(1) Leases that have terms of 12 months or less.
64
62

Table 13.2: Future Minimum Lease Payments
Operating LeasesFinance Leases
(in thousands)
Year Ending December 31, 2024$105 $2,258 
Year Ending December 31, 202537 2,314 
Year Ending December 31, 202637 2,371 
Year Ending December 31, 202737 2,431 
Year Ending December 31, 202825 2,492 
Thereafter— 1,049 
Total minimum lease payments241 12,915 
Less: Imputed interest(21)(1,667)
Total lease obligations220 11,248 
Less: Current portion of lease obligations(97)(1,730)
Long-term lease obligations$123 $9,518 
Table 13.3: Weighted-Average Remaining Lease Terms and Discount Rates
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years):
Finance leases5.3 years6.3 years
Operating leases3.4 years1.0 year
Weighted average discount rate:
Finance leases5.04%5.04%
Operating leases5.75%5.75%
Table 13.4: Supplemental Cash Flow Information Related to Leases
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows related to operating leases$585 $603 
Operating cash flows related to finance leases611 688 
Financing cash flows related to finance leases1,592 1,461 
14. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
Telos Shared Savings Plan

We sponsorsponsors a defined contribution employee savings plan (the “Plan”"Plan") under which substantially all full-time employees are eligible to participate. As of December 31, 2020,2023, the Plan held 2,391,5521,434,464 shares of Telos common stock. We matchPrior to March 2022, we matched one-half of employee contributionscontribution to the Plan up to a maximum of 2% of such employee’semployee's eligible annual base salary. In March 2022, we increased the maximum employer match up to 4% of the employee's eligible annual base salary. Participant contributions vestare always fully vested immediately and Companyat the time of contribution. Telos' contributions vest at the rate of 20% each year, with full vesting occurring after completion of five years of service. Effective September 1, 2023, we changed our Telos-contributed matching funds to a two-year vesting schedule: 20% vesting after one year of service, and fully vesting after the completion of two years of service.
Telos intends to fund the employer matching contribution in Telos stock, but will have the discretion to fund the match in cash or a combination of stock and cash. The Telos employer matching contribution is funded in the first quarter of the subsequent year.
Our total contributions to the Plan for 2020, 2019,2023 and 20182022 were $998,000, $861,000,$2.1 million and $721,000,$2.2 million, respectively.

65
Additionally, Telos ID sponsors a defined contribution savings plan (the “Telos ID Plan”) under which substantially all full-time employees are eligible to participate. Telos ID matches one-half of employee contributions to the Telos ID Plan up to a maximum of 2% of such employee’s eligible annual base salary. The total 2020, 2019, and 2018 Telos ID contributions to this plan were $179,000, $151,000, and $125,000, respectively.


63

Table of Contents
15. INCOME TAXES
Table 15.1: Components of Provision for/(Benefit from) Income Taxes
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Current provision
Federal$— $— 
State(19)19 
Total current(19)19 
Deferred tax expense
Federal32 37 
State23 (2)
Total deferred55 35 
Provision for income taxes$36 $54 
Table 15.2: Reconciliation of Statutory Tax Rate to Actual Tax Rate
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Computed expected income tax provision21.0 %21.0 %
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit3.6 3.6 
Change in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets7.5 (3.7)
Cumulative deferred adjustments— (0.9)
Provision to return adjustments(0.1)0.1 
Other permanent differences(0.2)(0.1)
Stock-based compensation(41.2)(20.6)
Section 162(m) limitation - covered employees9.5 (2.0)
Uncertain tax positions0.5 (0.5)
R&D credit(0.7)3.0 
Effective tax rate(0.1 %)(0.1 %)
66

Note 9.  Income Taxes

The provision (benefit) for income taxes attributable to income from operations includes the following (in thousands):

 For the Years Ended December 31, 
  
2020
  
2019
  
2018
 
Current (benefit) provision         
Federal $  $25  $(29)
State  (77)  68   (17)
Total current  (77)  93   (46)
             
Deferred provision (benefit)            
Federal  27   88   15 
State  4   (285)  62 
Total deferred  31   (197)  77 
Total (benefit) provision $(46) $(104) $31 

The provision for income taxes related to operations varies from the amount determined by applying the federal income tax statutory rate to the income or loss before income taxes. The reconciliation of these differences is as follows:

 For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019  2018 
Computed expected income tax provision  21.0%  21.0%  21.0%
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit  1.0   (0.7)  19.0 
Change in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets  17.0   (24.7)  (43.5)
Cumulative deferred adjustments  0.7   (1.1)  -- 
Provision to return adjustments  0.5   1.3   (1.7)
Other permanent differences  1.0   (3.8)  6.1 
Dividend and accretion on preferred stock  10.5   (35.8)  45.4 
Gain on redemption of preferred stock  (43.3)      
Section 162(m) limitation - covered employees  14.6   (6.9)  5.1 
Capitalization of IPO transaction costs  4.4       
FIN 48 liability  0.2   (3.7)  4.2 
R&D credit  (12.4)  19.0   (25.2)
Non-controlling interest  (15.9)  40.0   (40.1)
Impact of Tax Act        11.4 
   (0.7)%  4.6%  1.7%

64

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows (in thousands):
Table 15.3: Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
As of December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Accounts receivable, principally due to allowance for doubtful accounts$70 $33 
Allowance for inventory obsolescence and amortization203 210 
Accrued liabilities not currently deductible1,133 1,151 
Stock-based compensation1,352 7,943 
Accrued compensation2,457 915 
Lease liabilities2,906 3,349 
Goodwill30,947 34,009 
Capitalized research and development costs2,992 362 
Net operating loss carryforwards - federal8,402 6,034 
Net operating loss carryforwards - state1,522 1,155 
R&D tax credit3,647 3,760 
Amortization and depreciation252 — 
Total gross deferred tax assets55,883 58,921 
Less valuation allowance(54,999)(57,559)
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance884 1,362 
Deferred tax liabilities:
Right-of-use assets(1,697)(2,034)
Amortization and depreciation— (86)
Total deferred tax liabilities(1,697)(2,120)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(813)$(758)

 December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Deferred tax assets:      
Accounts receivable, principally due to allowance for doubtful accounts $78  $185 
Allowance for inventory obsolescence and amortization  398   316 
Accrued liabilities not currently deductible  2,204   1,649 
Accrued compensation  1,161   1,655 
Deferred rent  4,387   4,808 
Section 163(j) interest limitation  306   804 
Goodwill  41,534    
Net operating loss carryforwards - federal  3,814   2,583 
Net operating loss carryforwards - state  1,002   796 
Federal tax credit  1,986   1,326 
Total gross deferred tax assets  56,870   14,122 
Less valuation allowance  (52,198)  (7,206)
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance  4,672   6,916 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Amortization and depreciation  (4,471)  (2,623)
Unbilled accounts receivable, deferred for tax purposes  (853)  (1,611)
Goodwill basis adjustment and amortization     (2,886)
Telos ID basis difference     (417)
Total deferred tax liabilities  
(5,324
)
  (7,537)
Net deferred tax liabilities $(652) $(621)

The components of the valuation allowance are as follows (in thousands):

 
Balance Beginning of Period
  
Additions
  
Recoveries
  
Balance End
of Period
 
             
December 31, 2020 $7,206  $44,992  $--  $52,198 
December 31, 2019 $6,652  $554  $--  $7,206 
December 31, 2018 $7,219  $--  $(567) $6,652 

In March 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was enacted. The CARES Act, among other things, includes certain changes to U.S. tax law that impact the Company, including deferment of employer social security payments, modifications to interest deduction limitation rules, a technical correction to tax depreciation methods for certain qualified improvement property, and alternative minimum tax credit refund.

Beginning January 1, 2018, we are subject to several provisions of the Tax Act including computations under Section 162(m) executive compensation limitation and Section 163(j) interest limitation rules and we have considered the impact of each of these provisions as well as those under the CARES Act in our consolidated financial statements for the years ended  December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Table 15.4: Valuation Allowance Activity
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Balance at beginning of year$57,559 $55,588 
(Reductions)/additions(2,560)1,971 
Balance at end of year$54,999 $57,559 
We are required to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Based on available evidence,The realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. We considered projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and reversal of taxable temporary differences in making this assessment. As such,Based on available evidence, we have determined that a full valuation allowance is required as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019.2022. As a result of a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets and liabilities, a deferred tax liability related to indefinite-lived goodwill remainedremains on our consolidated balance sheets aton December 31, 20202023 and 2019.2022.

We recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities related to the purchase of an additional 50% interest in the partnership Telos ID, including a deferred tax asset of $44.9 million for tax-deductible goodwill generated in the transaction.  We also recorded a corresponding valuation allowance against the additional deferred taxes.

65

AtOn December 31, 2020,2023, for federal income tax purposes, there was approximately a $18.2$40.0 million net operating loss available to be carried forward to offset future taxable income. Approximately $10.6 million of these net operating loss carryforwards expire between 2035 andin 2037, the remaining will be carried forward indefinitely. As of December 31, 2020,2023, there was approximately $2.5$4.9 million of research and developmentR&D credit carryover which begins to expire in 2033. Certain tax attributes of the Company, including net operating losses and credits, would be subject to a limitation should an ownership change as defined under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, occur. The limitations resulting from a change in ownership could affect the Company’sCompany's ability to utilize its tax attributes. A study was completed in 2020 which confirmed that no limitation applies to the Company's tax attributes as of December 31, 2020. We believe that ownership activity since December 31, 2020 would not result in limitation sufficient to result in the expiration of unused attributes.

67

Table of Contents
Under the provisions of ASC 740, we determined that there were approximately $763,000, $714,000,$1.2 million and $649,000$1.4 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2020, 2019,2023 and 2018,2022, respectively. Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2020, 2019,2023 and 20182022 were $278,000, $369,000,$0.01 million and $369,000,$0.10 million, respectively, of tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. Also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2020, 2019,2023 and 20182022 were $485,000, $345,000,$1.2 million and $280,000,$1.3 million, respectively, of tax benefits that, if recognized, would not impact the effective tax rate due to the Company’sCompany's valuation allowance. We report interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense. The Company had accrued interest and penalties related to the unrecognized tax benefits of $241,000$0.01 million and $304,000,$0.10 million, which were recorded in other liabilities as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, respectively.

We believe that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will not significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months. The period for which tax years are open, 20172013 to 2020,2023, has not been extended beyond the applicable statute of limitations. As of December 31, 2020,2023, the Company is not under examination by any federal ortax jurisdiction, but is currently under examination by a state tax jurisdiction.

Table 15.5: Reconciliation of the Beginning and Ending Amounts of Unrecognized Tax Benefit
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Balance at beginning of year$1,357 $1,056 
Decrease in prior year tax positions(169)(5)
Increase related to current year tax positions131 377 
Decrease related to lapse of statutes(91)(71)
Balance at end of year$1,228 $1,357 
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):

 
 
2020
  
2019
  
2018
 
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of period $714  $649  $585 
(Decrease) increase in prior year tax positions  (104)  1   3 
Increase related to current year tax positions  213   101   92 
Decrease related to lapse of statutes  (60)  (37)  (31)
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of period $763  $714  $649 

6616. (LOSS)/EARNINGS PER SHARE

Note 10. Commitments

Leases
We lease office space and equipment under noncancelable operating and finance leases with various expiration dates, some of which contain renewal options.

Operating Leases
We account for leases in accordance with ASC Topic 842, “Leases,” which requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and lease liability on the consolidated balance sheets and expands disclosures about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors, among other items, for most lease arrangements.

In accordance with the adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, we recorded operating lease ROU assets, which represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and operating lease liabilities which represent our obligation to make lease payments. Generally, we enter into operating lease agreements for facilities. The amount of operating lease liabilities due within 12 monthsnet loss, potentially dilutive securities are recorded in other current liabilities, with the remaining operating lease liabilities recorded as non-current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets based on their contractual due dates. The operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized as of the lease commencement date at the present value of the lease payments over the lease term. Most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate that can readily be determined. Therefore, we use a discount rate based on our incremental borrowing rate which was 5.75% for all operating leases. Our operating lease agreements may include options to extend the lease term or terminate it early. We have included options to extend in the operating lease ROU assets and liabilities when we are reasonably certain that we will exercise such options. The weighted average remaining lease terms for our operating leases were approximately 2.5 years and 3.5 years at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.  The discount rates for our operating leases were 5.75% at December 31, 2020 and 2019. Operating lease expense is recognized as rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Somecalculation of our operating leases contain lease and non-lease components, which we account for as a single component. We evaluate ROU assets for impairment consistent with our property and equipment policy disclosure included in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.diluted net (loss)/earnings per share because to do so would be anti-dilutive.

Table 16.1: Potentially Dilutive Securities
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units687 529 
Total687 529 
As of December 31, 2020, operating lease ROU assets were $1.5 million2023 and operating lease liabilities were $1.6 million,2022, performance-based RSUs of which $0.9 million were classified as noncurrent.

Finance Leases
On March 1, 1996, we entered into a 20-year capital lease for a building43,800 and 336,785, respectively, have been excluded in Ashburn, Virginia that serves as our corporate headquarters. We had accounted for this transaction as a capital lease and had accordingly recorded assets and a corresponding liability of approximately $12.3 million. Effective November 1, 2013, this lease was terminated and we entered into a 13-year lease (the “2013 lease”) that would have expired in October 31, 2026. The 2013 lease was treated as a modification in accordance with ASC 840, “Leases”. As a resultthe calculation of the 2013 lease,potentially dilutive securities above because issuance of such shares are contingent upon the corresponding capital asset and liability increasedsatisfaction of certain conditions which were not satisfied by $11.7 million, resulting in a net book valuethe end of the capital asset of $13.1 million, and capital obligation of $15.5 million. The 2013 lease included an option to purchase, assign to, or designate a purchaser on June 1, 2014, which required notice of intent to exercise the option by not later than March 31, 2014.reporting period.

On March 28, 2014, we entered into a definitive agreement with an unrelated third party to assign the purchase option to that third party in return for cash consideration of $1.7 million, payable upon the closing of the purchase transaction, and certain obligations under the agreement, including entering into a new 15-year lease with the third party upon the third party’s exercise of the purchase option and purchase of the building from the prior landlord. On March 28, 2014, we provided the prior landlord notice of our assignment and exercise of the purchase option. On May 28, 2014, the third party completed the purchase transaction and the 2013 lease was terminated, with no ongoing obligations, by mutual agreement between us and the prior landlord. On the same day we entered into a new lease (the “2014 lease”) with the third party that expires on May 31, 2029. The 2014 lease was treated as a modification of the prior lease on the property in accordance with ASC 840, and determined to be a capital lease. As a result of the 2014 lease, the corresponding capital asset increased by $5.7 million, resulting in a net book value of the capital asset of $18.3 million and the liability increased by $6.7 million, resulting in a capital obligation of $22.0 million. The weighted average remaining lease terms for finance leases were approximately 8.3 years and 9.3 years at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.  The discount rates for our finance leases were 5.04% at December 31, 2020 and 2019.  In accordance with the 2014 Lease, the basic rent increases by a fixed 2.5% escalation annually.

6717. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Future minimum lease commitments at December 31, 2020 were as follows (in thousands):

 
 
Operating Leases
  
Finance Leases
 
2021 $752  $2,097 
2022  592   2,149 
2023  373   2,202 
2024  27   2,258 
2025     2,314 
After 2025     8,344 
Total minimum lease payments  1,744   19,364 
Less imputed interest  (126)  (3,724)
Net present value of minimum lease payments  1,618   15,640 
Less current portion  (677)  (1,339)
Long-term lease obligations at December 31, 2020 $941  $14,301 

The components of lease expense were as follows (in thousands):


 Year Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Operating lease cost $724  $597 
Short-term lease cost (1)  93   147 
Finance lease cost        
    Amortization of finance lease assets  1,221   1,221 
    Interest on finance lease liabilities  822   881 
Total finance lease cost  2,043   2,102 
Total lease costs $2,860  $2,846 
(1)Leases that have terms of 12 months or less.

Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31, 
  2020  2019 
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:      
Cash flows from operating activities - operating leases $745  $604 
Cash flows from operating activities - finance leases $820  $880 
Cash flows from financing activities - finance leases $1,225  $1,115 
Operating lease ROU assets obtained in exchange for operating lease   liabilities $613  $488 

Rent expense charged to operations totaled $1.1 million, $1.2 million, and $1.6 million for 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.

68

Warranties
We provide product warranties for products sold through certain U.S. Government contract vehicles. We accrue a warranty liability atEmmett J. Wood, the time that we recognize revenue for the estimated costs that may be incurred in connection with providing warranty coverage. Warranties are valued using historical warranty usage trends; however, if actual product failure rates or service delivery costs differ from estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability may be required. Accrued warranties were $30,000 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and are reported as other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.  There were no activities in accrued warranties for years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018.

Note 11.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Information concerning certain relationships and related party transactions between us and certain of our current shareholders and officers is set forth below.

The brother of our Chairman and CEO, Emmett J. Wood, has been an employee of ours since 1996. In January 2023, he tendered his resignation as an employee effective February 7, 2023. The amounts paid to this individualhim as compensation for 2020, 2019, and 2018 were $1,238,000, $529,000, and $552,000, respectively.  Additionally, Mr. Wood owned 682,502 shareshis remaining tenure in 2023 was $0.2 million, while the amount paid for the year ended December 31, 2022, was $1.3 million.
One of the Company’s commonCompany's directors serves as a consultant to the Company. On January 1, 2023, the director and the Company amended the consulting agreement under which he provides services ("2023 consulting agreement"), extending his services through June 30, 2023. The Company, at its election, would pay the director's 2023 consultancy fees in a fixed amount, in the form of restricted stock units. Consequently, on January 3, 2023, the Company granted the director 16,859 RSUs, one-half of which vested on March 3, 2023, and the other half vested on May 18, 2023, as ofcompensation for his consultancy services through June 30, 2023. In July 2023, the director and the Company amended the 2023 consulting agreement, extending his services through December 31, 20202023. The amended 2023 consulting agreement stipulates a firm-fixed monthly retainer fee, plus additional fees and 2019.contingent bonus payments upon achievement of certain contract goals, payable in cash.

On March 31, 2015,In February 2022, the director and the Company entered intoamended the Porter Notes. Mr. Porter and Toxford Corporation, of which Mr. Porter isconsulting agreement to provide that the sole shareholder, owned 35.0% of our Class A Common Stock. UnderCompany would pay the termsremainder of the Porter Notes, Porter lentdirector's consulting fees for 2022 in a fixed price amount in the form of restricted stock units. The Company $2.5 milliongranted the director 26,091 RSUs on or about March 31, 2015. AccordingFebruary 1, 2022, which vested quarterly in four equal amounts through the end of the fiscal year 2022, subject to the terms of the Porter Notes, the outstanding principal sum bore interest at the fixed rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum which would be payable in arrears in cash on the 20th day of each May, August, November and February, with the first interest payment date due on August 20, 2015. The Porter Notes did not call for amortization payments and were unsecured. The Porter Notes, in whole or in part, may be repaid at any time without premium or penalty. The unpaid principal, together with interest, was originally due and payable in full on July 1, 2017. 

On April 18, 2017, we amended and restated the Porter Notes to reduce the interest rate from twelve percent (12%) to six percent (6%) per annum, to be accrued, and extended the maturity date from July 1, 2017 to July 25, 2022. Telos also entered into Intercreditor Agreements with Porter and EnCap, in which the Porter Notes were fully subordinated to the Credit Agreement and any subsequent senior lenders (including Action Capital), and paymentsdirector's continued performance under the Porter Notesconsulting agreement.
68

Table of Contents
The cash amount paid for his consultancy services were permitted only if certain conditions were met. All other terms remained in full force$0.09 million and effect. We incurred interest expense in the amount of $319,000, $330,000, and $308,000$0.03 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019,2023, and 2018, respectively,2022, respectively.
18. SEGMENT INFORMATION
As noted in Note 2 Significant Accounting Policies, we conduct our operations through two operating segments: Security Solutions and Secure Networks.
Our Security Solutions segment is primarily focused on cybersecurity, cloud and identity solutions, and secure messaging through Xacta, Telos Ghost, Telos Advanced Cyber Analytics ("Telos ACA"), Telos Automated Message Handling System ("AMHS") and Telos ID offerings. We recognize revenue on contracts from providing various system platforms in the Porter Notes.

On November 23, 2020,cloud, on-premises, and in hybrid cloud environments, as well as software sales or software-as-a-service. Revenue associated with the segment's custom solutions is recognized as work progresses or upon delivery of services and products. Fluctuation in revenue from period to period is the closingresult of the IPO,volume of software sales, and the Porter Notesprogress or completion of cloud and/or cybersecurity solutions during the period. The majority of the operating costs relate to labor, material, and overhead costs. Software sales have immaterial operation costs associated with them, thus yielding higher margins. Gross profit and margin are a function of operational efficiency on security solutions and changes in the volume of software sales.
Our Secure Networks segment provides secure networking architectures and solutions to our customers through secure mobility solutions, and network management and defense services. Revenue is recognized over time as the work progresses on contracts related to managing network services and information delivery. Contract costs include labor, material, and overhead costs. Variances in costs recognized from period to period primarily reflect increases and decreases in activity levels on individual contracts.
Table 18.1: Results of Operations by Business Segment
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Revenues
Security Solutions$77,416 $120,454 
Secure Networks67,962 96,433 
Total revenue145,378 216,887 
Gross profit
Security Solutions39,614 61,948 
Secure Networks13,328 17,095 
Total gross profit52,942 79,043 
Selling, general and administrative expenses93,257 132,893 
Operating loss(40,315)(53,850)
Other income6,715 1,350 
Interest expense(786)(874)
Loss before income taxes(34,386)(53,374)
Provision for income taxes(36)(54)
Net loss$(34,422)$(53,428)
We measure each segment's profitability based on gross profit. We account for inter-segment sales and transfers as if the sales or transfers were paidto third parties, that is, at current market prices. Interest income, interest expense, other income and expense items, and income taxes, as reported in full.the consolidated financial statements, are not part of the segment profitability measure and are primarily recorded at the corporate level.

Management does not utilize total assets by segment to evaluate segment performance or allocate resources. As a result, assets are not tracked by segment, and therefore, total assets by segment are not disclosed.
69
69

Table of Contents
Note 12. Summary of Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

The following is a summary of selected quarterly financial data for the previous two fiscal years (in thousands):

 Quarters Ended 
  March 31  June 30  Sept. 30  Dec. 31 
2020            
Revenue $38,980  $48,610  $47,440  $44,887 
Gross profit  12,242   17,573   16,562   16,043 
(Loss) income before income taxes and non-controlling interest  (1,606)  3,074   2,502   2,825 
 Net (loss) income attributable to Telos Corporation (1)(2)  (2,244)  266   (200)  3,865 
      Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic  38,073   38,583   39,002   50,383 
      Weighted-average common shares outstanding, diluted  38,073   39,927   39,002   51,288 
      Basic net (loss) earnings per share  (0.06)  0.01   (0.01)  0.08 
      Diluted net (loss) earnings per share  (0.06)  0.01   (0.01)  0.08 
                 
2019                
Revenue $31,166  $36,048  $45,531  $46,473 
Gross profit  8,976   10,015   16,313   17,040 
(Loss) income before income taxes and non-controlling interest  (3,137)  (1,974)  3,708   (838)
Net (loss) income attributable to Telos Corporation (1)(3)  (3,413)  (1,741)  2,233   (3,480)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic  37,116   37,642   38,073   38,073 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, diluted  37,116   37,642   39,931   38,073 
Basic net (loss) earnings per share  (0.09)  (0.05)  0.06   (0.09)
Diluted net (loss) earnings per share  (0.09)  (0.05)  0.06   (0.09)

(1)Changes in net income are the result of several factors, including seasonality of the government year-end buying season, as well as the nature and timing of other deliverables.
(2)
Net income for the second quarter of 2020 is attributable to a change in the mix and timing of Telos ID  deliverables.
(3)
Net income for the third quarter of 2019  is attributable to $2.6 million in proprietary software sales which carry lower cost of sales.

Note 13.  Commitments, Contingencies, and Subsequent Events

Financial Condition and Liquidity
While a variety of factors related to sources and uses of cash, such as timeliness of accounts receivable collections, vendor credit terms, or significant collateral requirements, ultimately impact our liquidity, such factors may or may not have a direct impact on our liquidity, based on how the transactions associated with such circumstances impact our availability under our credit arrangements. For example, a contractual requirement to post collateral for a duration of several months, depending on the materiality of the amount, could have an immediate negative effect on our liquidity, as such a circumstance would utilize cash resources without a near-term cash inflow back to us. Likewise, the release of such collateral could have a corresponding positive effect on our liquidity, as it would represent an addition to our cash resources without any corresponding near-term cash outflow. Similarly, a slow-down of payments from a customer, group of customers or government payment office would not have an immediate and direct effect on our availability unless the slowdown was material in amount and over an extended period of time. Any of these examples would have an impact on our cash resources, our financing arrangements, and therefore our liquidity.

Upon the closing of our initial public offering, we issued 17.2 million shares of our common stock at a price of $17.00 per share, generating net proceeds of approximately $272.8 million. We used approximately $108.9 million of the net proceeds in connection with the ERPS Conversion (see Note 7 – Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock Conversion), $30.0 million to fund our acquisition of the outstanding Class B Units of Telos ID (see Note 2 – Purchase of Telos ID/Non-controlling Interests), $21.0 million to repay our outstanding senior term loan and subordinated debt (see Note 6 – Debt Obligations).  We intend to use the remaining net proceeds for general corporate purposes. We also may use a portion of the net proceeds to acquire complementary businesses, products, services, or technologies. However, we do not have agreements, commitments, or plans for any specific acquisitions at this time. The amounts and timing of our actual use of the net proceeds will vary depending on numerous factors. Proceeds held by us is invested in short-term investments until needed for the uses described above. We currently anticipate that we will retain all available funds for use in the operation and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Our working capital was $105.2 million and $2.9 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

70

19. COMMITMENT AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings

Hamot et al. v. Telos Corporation

As previously reported, beginning on August 2, 2007, Messrs. Seth W. Hamot (“Hamot”) and Andrew R. Siegel (“Siegel”), principals of Costa Brava Partnership III, L.P. (“Costa Brava”), were involved in litigation againstFrom time to time, the Company as Plaintiffs and Counter-defendants in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland (the “Circuit Court”). Mr. Siegel was a Class D Director of the Company and Mr. Hamot was a Class D Director of the Company until his resignation on March 9, 2018. The Plaintiffs initially alleged that certain documents and records had not been provided to them promptly and were necessary to fulfill their duties as directors of the Company. Subsequently, Hamot and Siegel further alleged that the Company had failed to follow certain provisions concerning the noticing of Board committee meetings and the recording of Board meeting minutes and, additionally, that Mr. John Wood’s service as both CEO and Chairman of the Board was improper and impermissible under the Company’s Bylaws. On April 23, 2008, the Company filed a counterclaim against Hamot and Siegel for money damages and preliminary and injunctive relief based upon Hamot and Siegel’s interference with, and improper influence of, the Company’s independent auditors regarding, among other things, a specific accounting treatment.  On June 27, 2008, the Circuit Court granted the Company’s motion for preliminary injunction and enjoined Hamot and Siegel from contacting the Company’s auditors until the completion of the Company’s Form 10-K for the preceding year, which injunction later expired by its own terms. As previously disclosed, trial on Hamot and Siegel’s claims and the Company’s counterclaims took place in July through September 2013, and the Court subsequently issued decisions on the various claims by way of memorandum opinions and orders dated September 11, 2017. Among other rulings, the Court found Hamot and Siegel liable for the intentional tort of tortious interference with the Company’s contractual relationship with one of its auditors and entered a monetary judgment in favor of the Company and against Hamot and Siegel for approximately $278,000. The Company’s subsequent appeal of the amount of damages awarded to it for Hamot and Siegel’s intentional interference was ultimately dismissed by way of the Mandate issued by the Court of Appeals of Maryland on October 11, 2019.

Hamot (and later, his Estate) and Siegel on multiple occasions during this litigation have sought tomay be indemnified or to be awarded advancement of various attorney’s fees and expenses incurred by them in this litigation.  On October 20, 2020, Hamot’s Estate and Siegel (together the “Plaintiffs”) filed their latest Motion for Indemnification of Legal Fees and Expenses against the Company in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and a Request for a Hearing.  The Motion demands that the Company indemnify the Plaintiffs for legal fees and expenses incurred in the sum of $2,540,000.  The Company filed an Opposition to the Motion on November 4, 2020. On January 28, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to File Amended Motion for Indemnification of Legal Fees and Expenses, which the Company opposed, and which was granted by the Court on February 23, 2021, and briefing of the Amended Motion for Indemnification of Legal Fees and Expenses (“Amended Motion”) continues. A hearing is scheduled before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Indemnification of Legal Fees and Expenses for May 18, 2021. The Company denies that it has any liability for indemnification to the Plaintiffs and intends to vigorously defend the matter through its opposition to the Amended Motion and further proceedings.

At this stage of the litigation, it is impossible to reasonably determine the degree of probability related to the Company’s success in relation to this claim by Hamot’s Estate and Siegel for indemnification for certain attorney’s fees and expenses incurred in this litigation. The Company intends to vigorously defend the matter.
Other Litigation

In addition, the Company is a party to litigation or claims arising in the ordinary course of business.  Inbusiness, including those relating to employment matters, relationship with clients and contractors, intellectual property disputes, and other business matters. These legal proceedings seek various remedies, including claims for monetary damages in varying amounts, none of which are considered material, or are unspecified as to amount. Although the opinionoutcome of any such matter is inherently uncertain and may be materially adverse, based on current information, management whilebelieves that the results of such litigation cannot be predicted with any reasonable degree of certainty, the final outcome of such known matters will not based upon all available information, have a material adverse effect on the Company's condensedfinancial condition and results of operations.
Management does not believe that there are any litigation or claims that would have a material adverse effect on the business, or the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Subsequent Events

On January 25, 2021, we filed Form S-8 to register a total of 7,459,913 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to be issued under the terms and conditionsstatements of the 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan approvedCompany as of December 31, 2023.
Other - Government Contracts
As a U.S. government contractor, we are subject to various audits and investigations by the stockholders atU.S. government to determine whether our operations are being conducted in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. U.S. government investigations of our operations, whether relating to government contracts or conducted for other reasons, could result in administrative, civil, or criminal liabilities, including repayments, fines or penalties being imposed upon us, suspension, proposed debarment, debarment from eligibility for future U.S. government contracting, or suspension of export privileges. Suspension or debarment could have a meetingmaterial adverse effect on us because of our dependence on contracts with the U.S. government. U.S. government investigations often take years to complete and many result in no adverse action against us. We also provide products and services to customers outside of the United States, which are subject to U.S. and foreign laws and regulations and foreign procurement policies and practices. Our compliance with local regulations or applicable U.S. government regulations also may be audited or investigated.
20. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Table 20.1: Details of Cash, Cash Equivalent, and Restricted Cash
As of December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents$99,260 $119,305 
Restricted cash (1)
136 133 
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$99,396 $119,438 
(1)Restricted cash consists of a commercial money market account held as a deposit on October 26, 2020.the Ashburn lease and is recorded under "Other assets" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


Table 20.2: Supplemental Cash Flow Information
For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest$693 $803 
Income taxes147 188 
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Operating lease ROU assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities$125 $511 
Capital expenditure activity in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities341 211 
Issuance of common stock for 401K match1,943 — 
Intangible assets transferred to extinguish other financing obligations7,089 — 
Common stock repurchase under accounts payable and other accrued liabilities— 139 
Deferred financing costs in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities— 114 
70
71

Table of Contents
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.
N/A.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Inherent Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, believes that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are effective at the reasonable assurance level. However, management does not expect that such disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
AsOur management, with the participation of December 31, 2020, an evaluation ofour principal executive officer (our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) and principal financial officer (our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in RuleRules 13a-15(e) andor 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act), was performed under the supervision and with the participationAct of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.1934) as of December 31, 2023. Based onupon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officerprincipal executive officer and Chief Financial Officerprincipal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Companyus in itsthe reports that it fileswe file or submitssubmit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms of the SEC. These disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Companyus in the reports the Company filesthat we file or submitssubmit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officerprincipal executive officer and Chief Financial Officer,our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
a.Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
b.Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded properly to allow for the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
c.Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Internal control over financial reporting includes the controls themselves, monitoring and internal auditing practices and actions taken to correct deficiencies as identified.
Our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on the framework established in the 2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Our management has assessed in its evaluation the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, and has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, audited our consolidated financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting, and the firm’s report on our internal control over financial reporting are included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Although our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, because of inherent limitations, our management does not expect that our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness in such assessment to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may be inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
71

Table of Contents
Remediation of Previously Disclosed Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
As previously disclosed in Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, management identified a material weakness as of that date. The material weakness identified as of December 31, 2022 was related to ineffective design and maintenance of controls over the assessment of the accounting for forfeiture of non-standard equity awards. In response to the material weakness, we implemented changes to our internal control over financial reporting, which consisted primarily of enhancement of existing processes and controls over the accounting for the forfeiture of non-standard equity awards. We have completed documentation of these corrective actions and, based on the evidence obtained in validating the design and operating effectiveness of the implemented control, we have concluded that the previously disclosed material weakness has been remediated as of March 31, 2023.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has beenwere no changechanges in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the yearquarter ended December 31, 20202023, that hashave materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect,effect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

(a) None.
On March 23, 2021,(b) During the Board approved the Third Amended and Restated Bylawsthree months ended December 31, 2023, no director or officer of the Company.  The only change was to Article III, Section 11, which transfers the responsibilityCompany adopted or terminated a "Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement" or "non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement," as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of determining director compensation from the Audit Committee to the Compensation Committee.  The Compensation Committee is already responsible for reviewing and determining the compensation of the officers and the consolidation of the responsibility for compensation of both officers and directors in the Compensation Committee was done for reasons of efficiency and coordination.Regulation S-K.


Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not applicable.
72
72

Table of Contents

PART III

Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K since we intend to file our definitive proxy statement for our 2021 annual meeting2024 Annual Meeting of stockholders,Stockholders, or the Proxy Statement, pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K,10K, and certain information to be included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information required by this item regarding executive officers, directors and nominees for directors, including information with respect to our audit committee and audit committee financial expert, and the compliance of certain reporting persons with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, will be included under Election of Directors, Biographical Information Concerning the Company’sCompany's Executive Officers, Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, Corporate Governance, Independence of Directors, Board of Directors Nomination Process, Role in Risk Oversight, Meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees of the Board of Directors, as well as Audit Committee, Management Development and Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement under Compensation of Executive Officers and Directors and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2023, information with respect to (a) number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights, (b) the weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights and (c) the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under our existing equity incentive plan. All shares under our existing equity incentive plan may be issued in the form of restricted stock, performance shares, stock appreciation rights, stock units, or other stock-based awards.
(a)(b)(c)
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsWeighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rightsNumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)
2,176,413 $5.07 4,831,794 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders— — — 
Total2,176,413 $5.07 4,831,794 
(1) Consists of the Company's 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended.
All other information required by this item will be included in ouris herein incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under Security Ownershiprelating to the 2024 Annual Meeting of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and is incorporated herein by reference.Stockholders.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement under Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Independence of Directors and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement under Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and is incorporated herein by reference.

73

Table of Contents
PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Documents filed as part of this report are as follows:
1.Financial Statements

As listedStatements. The Company's consolidated financial statements are included in the Index toItem 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data on page 40.Data.

2.Financial Statement Schedules

Schedules. All schedules are omitted as the required information is not applicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements.
3.Exhibits. The exhibit listed in the Exhibit Index immediately below are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or related notes.are incorporated by reference herein.

Incorporated by Reference Herein
Exhibit NumberDescription of ExhibitForm/ ScheduleDate FiledExhibit Number
8-KNovember 16, 20203.2
8-KNovember 9, 20233.1
10-KMarch 28, 20224.13
*10-QMay 17, 202110.1
*10-KApril 1, 201310.23
*10-QNovember 14, 201210.1
*10-QAugust 16, 202110.1
*10-KMarch 16, 202310.5
*8-KFebruary 28, 202299.1
*8-KSeptember 20, 202399.1
*10-QAugust 15, 201610.3
*S-8January 25, 20214.4
*DEF 14AMarch 28, 2023A
*10-QAugust 15, 201610.4
*8-KFebruary 3, 202199.1
*8-KFebruary 3, 202199.2
*10-QAugust 9, 202310.1
*10-QAugust 9, 202310.2
8-KJanuary 5, 202399.1
10-QMay 10, 202310.1
*constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
+filed herewith
^furnished herewith

74

73


3.     Exhibits:

Exhibit Number
Description
Incorporated by Reference Herein
3.1Exhibit NumberDescription of Amendment of Telos Corporation dated November 12, 2020 (Incorporated by reference to ExhibitForm/ ScheduleDate FiledExhibit 3.1 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K report on November 16, 2020)
 3.2+Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of Telos Corporation, effective as of March 23, 2021
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
First Amendment to Subordinated Loan Agreement, dated April 18, 2017, between Telos Corporation and JP Charitable Foundation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on April 24, 2017)
4.7
First Amendment to Subordinated Loan Agreement, dated April 18, 2017, between Telos Corporation and Porter Foundation Switzerland (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on April 24, 2017)
4.8
Amended and Restated Subordinated Promissory Note, dated April 18, 2017, by Telos Corporation in favor of JP Charitable Foundation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on April 24, 2017)
4.9
Amended and Restated Subordinated Promissory Note, dated April 18, 2017, by Telos Corporation in favor of Porter Foundation Switzerland (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on April 24, 2017)
4.10
4.11
4.12
Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Second Amendment to Fee Letter between Telos Corporation and Enlightenment Capital Solutions Fund II, L.P. dated March 26, 2020 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on March 30, 2020)
Number
10.1*21.1
Telos Corporation 2008 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2007)
10.2*
+
Second Amended Employment Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2012, between the Company and John B. Wood (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended September 30, 2012)
10.3*
Second Amended Employment Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2012, between the Company and Edward L. Williams (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended September 30, 2012)
10.4*
Second Amended Employment Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2012, between the Company and Michele Nakazawa (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended September 30, 2012)
10.5*
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2012, between the Company and Brendan D. Malloy (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended September 30, 2012)
10.6*
Form of Employment Agreement between the Company and six of its executive officers (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended September 30, 2012)
10.7*
Telos Corporation 2013 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A filed with the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A on April 16, 2013)


74


10.8*
Form Restricted Stock Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on May 15, 2013)
10.9*
Employment Agreement, dated as of January 4, 2013, between the Company and Jefferson V. Wright (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2013)
10.10
Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Telos Identity Management Solutions , LLC, dated December 24, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on December 31, 2014)
10.11
Subordinated Loan Agreement between the Company and Porter Foundation Switzerland dated March 31, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K/A report for the year ended December 31, 2014)
10.12
Subordinated Promissory Note between the Company and Porter Foundation Switzerland dated March 31, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K/A report for the year ended December 31, 2014)
10.13
Subordinated Loan Agreement between the Company and JP Charitable Foundation Switzerland dated March 31, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K/A report for the year ended December 31, 2014)
10.14
Subordinated Promissory Note between the Company and JP Charitable Foundation Switzerland dated March 31, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K/A report for the year ended December 31, 2014)
10.15
Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement between Telos Corporation and Republic Capital Access, LLC dated July 15, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on July 21, 2016)
10.16
Financing and Security Agreement between Telos Corporation and Action Capital Corporation, dated July 15, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on July 21, 2016)
10.17*
Telos Corporation 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended June 30, 2016)
10.18*
Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended June 30, 2016)
10.19
Amendment to Financing and Security Agreement Between the Company and Action Capital Corporation dated September 6, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on September 9, 2016)
10.20*
Telos ID Sale Bonus Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2016)
10.21
First Amendment to Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement between Telos Corporation and Republic Capital Access, LLC dated March 2, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2017)
10.22*
Telos Corporation Senior Officer Incentive Program, Adopted as Revised March 29, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2017)
10.23
Amendment to Financing and Security Agreement Between Telos Corporation and Action Capital Corporation dated August 13, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended June 30, 2018)
10.24
Second Amendment to Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement between Telos Corporation and Republic Capital Access, LLC dated November 15, 2019 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 filed the Company’s Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2019)
10.25
Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated October 5, 2020 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on October 6, 2020)
10.26
Amended Voting and Support Agreement, dated October 19, 2020 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q report for the quarter ended September 30, 2020)
10.27*
Amendment No. 1 to the 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 filed with the Company’s Form S-8 on January 25, 2021)
10.28*
The Company’s Annual Cash Incentive Plan for 2021 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on November 12, 2020)
10.29*
Form of Restricted Share Unit Award Notice and Restricted Share or Restricted Share Unit Agreement (Time-Based) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on February 3, 2021)
10.30*
Form of Restricted Share Unit Award Notice and Restricted Share or Restricted Share Unit Agreement (Performance-Based) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on February 3, 2021)
21+
23++
31.1++
31.2++
32+^

75

Table of Contents

101.INS^+
101.INS+XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
101.SCH^101.SCH+XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL^101.CAL+XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF^101.DEF+XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB^101.LAB+XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE^101.PRE+XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
104Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page iXBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document contained in Exhibit 101
*constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
+filed herewith
^furnished herewith

*   constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
+   filed herewith
^   in accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall be deemed to be furnished and not filed

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.
75
76

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Telos Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

TELOS CORPORATION
By:
/s/ John B. WoodMarch 15, 2024
By:
John B. Wood
Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board (Principal
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date:
March 25, 2021

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of Telos Corporation and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ John B. Wood
March 15, 2024
John B. WoodChief Executive Officer and (Principal Executive Officer)
Chairman
of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)
and Director
/s/ Mark BendzaMarch 25, 202115, 2024
John B. WoodMark Bendza
/s/ Michele Nakazawa
Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
/s/ Victoria HardingMarch 15, 2024
Victoria HardingController and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)March 25, 2021
Michele Nakazawa
/s/ Bernard C. Bailey
DirectorMarch 25, 2021
Bernard C. Bailey 
/s/ David Borland
DirectorMarch 25, 202115, 2024
David BorlandDirector
/s/ Bonnie CarrollDirectorMarch 25, 202115, 2024
Bonnie CarrollDirector
/s/ Fredrick D. ShaufeldSchaufeldDirectorMarch 25, 202115, 2024
Fredrick D. ShaufeldSchaufeldDirector
/s/ John W. MaludaDirectorMarch 25, 202115, 2024
John W. Maluda, Major Gen., USAF (Ret)Director
/s/ Brad JacobsMarch 15, 2024
Brad JacobsDirector
/s/ Derrick D. DockeryMarch 15, 2024
Derrick D. DockeryDirector


76
77