In response to the financial crises of 2008-2009, Dodd-Frank was enacted in July 2010.  Dodd-Frank established a comprehensive framework for the regulation of markets, market participants and financial instruments that were previously unregulated and substantially altered the regulation of many other markets, market participants and financial instruments. Although most provisions of Dodd-Frank have now been implemented, certain provisions require rule making by applicable regulators before becoming fully effective. It is difficult to predict the ultimate impact of Dodd-Frank on the Trust or Campbell & Company (or any affiliates thereof), or the markets in which the Trust will trade. Dodd-Frank could result in certain investment strategies in which the Trust engages or may have otherwise engaged becoming non-viable or non-economic to implement. Dodd-Frank and regulations adopted pursuant to Dodd-Frank could have a material adverse impact on the profit potential of the Trust.

Recent market turmoil has prompted certain acts of governmental intervention, and it is likely that additional measures will be implemented in the future. No assurances can be made that any such measures would be successful. Such measures could have unexpected, and potentially adverse, effects on the Trust or Campbell & Company (or any affiliates thereof), the markets in which the Trust will trade, or certain investment strategies in which the Trust engages or may have otherwise engaged.

The CFTC and certain exchanges have established position limits on the maximum net long or net short speculative positions that any person or group of persons acting in concert may hold or control in any particular futures contracts and the CFTC imposes similar limits on certain economically equivalent OTC derivatives. All accounts owned or managed by Campbell & Company are likely to be combined for speculative position limit purposes. The Trust could be required to liquidate positions it holds in order to comply with such limits, or may not be able to fully implement trading instructions generated by its trading models, in order to comply with such limits. Any such liquidation or limited implementation could result in substantial costs to the Trust.

Dodd-Frank includes provisions that comprehensively regulate the OTC derivatives markets subject to rulemaking and oversight by the CFTC and SEC. Dodd-Frank mandates that a substantial portion of OTC derivatives be executed in regulated markets and be submitted for clearing to regulated clearinghouses. OTC trades submitted for clearing are subject to minimum initial and variation margin requirements set by the relevant clearinghouse, as well as margin requirements mandated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), SEC and/or federal prudential regulators. OTC derivatives dealers also typically demand the unilateral ability to increase the Trust’s collateral requirements for cleared OTC trades beyond any regulatory and clearinghouse minimums. The regulators also have broad discretion to impose margin requirements on non-cleared OTC derivatives and new requirements that apply to the holding of customer collateral by OTC derivatives dealers. These requirements may increase the amount of collateral the Trust is required to provide and the costs associated with providing it. OTC derivative dealers also are required to post margin to the clearinghouses through which they clear their customers’ trades instead of using such margin in their operations, as was widely permitted before Dodd-Frank. This has and may continue to increase the OTC derivative dealers’ costs, which costs are generally passed through to other market participants in the form of higher upfront and mark-to-market margin, less favorable trading pricing, and the imposition of new or increased fees, including clearing account maintenance fees.

With respect to cleared OTC derivatives, the Trust will not face a clearinghouse directly but rather through an OTC derivatives dealer that is registered with the CFTC or SEC to act as a clearing member. The Trust may face the indirect risk of the failure of another clearing member customer to meet its obligations to its clearing member. Such scenario could arise due to a default by the clearing member on its obligations to the clearinghouse, triggered by a customer’s failure to meet its obligations to the clearing member.

OTC derivatives dealers are now required to register with the CFTC as swap dealers and, beginning insince late 2021, may bemany have been required to register with the SEC as security-based swap dealers. Registered dealers are (or will be) subject to various regulatory requirements, including capital and margin requirements, business conduct standards, disclosure requirements, reporting and recordkeeping requirements, transparency requirements, position limits, limitations on conflicts of interest, and other regulatory burdens. These requirements have and will continue to increase the overall costs for OTC derivative dealers, which costs may be passed along to market participants including the Trust. The full impact of Dodd-Frank on the Trust remains uncertain, as well as the impact of additional, sometimes overlapping, regulatory requirements imposed by non-U.S. regulators.

Major OTC derivatives market participants are now also required to register with the CFTC in various capacities and may ultimately be required to register with the SEC. Campbell & Company is registered as a Swap Firm with the National Futures Association and could potentially be required to register as a major swap participant for trading in the OTC derivatives markets. Major swap participants are also subject to new minimum capital and margin requirements, business conduct standards, disclosure requirements, reporting and recordkeeping requirements, transparency requirements, position limits, limitations on conflicts of interest, and other regulatory burdens. These requirements may further increase the overall costs for major swap participants. The overall impact of Dodd-Frank on Campbell & Company remains uncertain.

Although Dodd-Frank requires many OTC derivative transactions previously entered into on a principal-to-principal basis to be submitted for clearing by a regulated clearinghouse, certain derivatives that may be traded by the Trust may remain principal-to-principal or OTC contracts between the Trust and third parties entered into privately. The risk of counterparty nonperformance can be significant in the case of these over-the-counter instruments, and “bid-ask” spreads may be unusually wide in these heretofore substantially unregulated markets. While Dodd-Frank is intended in part to reduce these risks, its success in this respect may not be evident for some time after Dodd-Frank is fully implemented, a process that may take several more years. To the extent not mitigated by implementation of Dodd-Frank, if at all, the risks posed by such instruments and techniques, which can be extremely complex, include: (1) credit risks (the exposure to the possibility of loss resulting from a counterparty’s failure to meet its financial obligations); (2) market risk (adverse movements in the price of a financial asset or commodity); (3) legal risks (the characterization of a transaction or a party’s legal capacity to enter into it could render the financial contract unenforceable, and the insolvency or bankruptcy of a counterparty could preempt otherwise enforceable contract rights); (4) operational risk (inadequate controls, deficient procedures, human error, system failure or fraud); (5) documentation risk (exposure to losses resulting from inadequate documentation); (6) liquidity risk (exposure to losses created by inability to prematurely terminate the derivative); (7) system risk (the risk that financial difficulties in one institution or a major market disruption will cause uncontrollable financial harm to the financial system); (8) concentration risk (exposure to losses from the concentration of closely related risks such as exposure to a particular industry or exposure linked to a particular entity); and (9) settlement risk (the risk faced when one party to a transaction has performed its obligations under a contract but has not yet received value from its counterparty).

Institutions, such as brokerage firms, banks and broker-dealers, generally have custody of the Trust’s portfolio assets and may hold such assets in “street name.” The Trust is subject to the risk that these firms and other brokers, counterparties, clearinghouses or exchanges with which the Trust deals may default on their obligations to the Trust. Any default by any of such parties could result in material losses to the Trust. Bankruptcy or fraud at one of these institutions could also impair the operational capabilities or the capital position of the Trust. In addition, securities and other assets deposited with custodians or brokers may not be clearly identified as being assets of the Trust, causing the Trust to be exposed to a credit risk with regard to such parties. The Trust generally will only be an unsecured creditor of its trading counterparties in the event of bankruptcy or administration of such counterparties. In some jurisdictions, the Trust may also only be an unsecured creditor of its brokers in the event of bankruptcy or administration of such brokers. The Trust attempts to limit its brokerage and custody transactions to well capitalized and established banks and brokerage firms in an effort to mitigate such risks, but the collapse in 2008 of the seemingly well capitalized and established Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers demonstrates the limits on the effectiveness of this approach in avoiding counterparty losses.

While Dodd-Frank is intended to bring more stability and lower counterparty risk to derivatives market by requiring exchange clearing of derivatives trades, not all of the Trust’s trades will be subject to the clearing requirements once they generally become effective, either because the trades are grandfathered or because they are bespoke. Furthermore, it is yet to be seen whether Dodd-Frank will be effective in reducing counterparty risk or if such risk may actually increase as a result of market uncertainty, mutuality of loss to clearinghouse members, or other reasons.

The global financial markets have gone through periods of pervasive and fundamental disruptions, which have led, to extensive and unprecedented government intervention. Such intervention was in certain cases implemented on an “emergency” basis, suddenly and substantially eliminating market participants’ ability to continue to implement certain strategies or manage the risk of their outstanding positions. In addition, as one would expect given the complexities of the financial markets and the limited time frame within which governments have felt compelled to take action, these interventions have at times been unclear in scope and application, resulting in confusion and uncertainty which in itself has been materially detrimental to the efficient functioning of the markets as well as previously successful investment strategies

Considerable regulatory attention has been focused on non-traditional investment pools. Market disruptions and the dramatic increase in the capital allocated to alternative investment strategies have led to increased governmental as well as self-regulatory scrutiny of the “hedge fund” industry in general. Certain legislation proposing greater regulation of the industry periodically is considered by Congress, the SEC, the CFTC and the governing bodies of non-U.S. jurisdictions. It is impossible to predict what, if any, changes in the regulations applicable to the Trust, Campbell & Company, the markets in which they trade and invest or the counterparties with which they do business may be instituted in the future. Any such regulation could have a material adverse impact on the profit potential of the Trust or the ability of the Trust to continue to implement its investment strategies, as well as require increased transparency as to the identity of the Limited Partners.

The futures markets are subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations and margin requirements.  In addition, the CFTC and the exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of a market emergency, including, for example, the retroactive implementation of speculative position limits or higher margin requirements, the establishment of daily price limits and the suspension of trading.  The regulation of swaps and futures transactions in the United States is a rapidly changing area of law and is subject to modification by government and judicial action.  The effect of any future regulatory change on the Trust is impossible to predict, but could be substantial and adverse.

Most U.S. futures exchanges have established “daily price fluctuation limits” which preclude the execution of trades at prices outside of the limit.  Contract prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading.  If prices were to approach the level of the daily limits, these limits could cause a modification of Campbell & Company’s trading decisions for the Trust or force the liquidation of certain futures positions.  Either of these actions may not be in the best interest of the investors.  From time to time, the CFTC or the exchanges may suspend trading in market disruption circumstances.  In these cases, it is possible that Campbell & Company, as trading manager, could be required to maintain a losing position that it otherwise would exit and incur significant losses or be unable to establish a position and miss a profit opportunity.

A substantial portion of Campbell & Company’s trades takes place on markets or exchanges outside the United States.  From time to time, over 50% of the Trust’s overall market exposure could involve positions taken on foreign markets.  The risk of loss in trading foreign futures contracts can be substantial.  Participation in foreign futures contracts transactions involves the execution and clearing of trades on, or subject to the rules of, a foreign board of trade.  Non-U.S. markets may not be subject to the same degree of regulation as their U.S. counterparts.  None of the CFTC, NFA or any domestic exchange regulates activities of any foreign boards of trade, including the execution, delivery and clearing of transactions, nor do they have the power to compel enforcement of the rules of a foreign board of trade or any applicable foreign laws.  Trading on foreign exchanges also presents the risks of exchange controls, expropriation, taxation and government disruptions.

In an effort to facilitate the investment strategies employed by the Campbell & Company on behalf of the Trust, the Trust and/or Campbell & Company may become members of exchanges and/or swap execution facilities (“SEFs”).  Such membership may subject the Trust and/or Campbell & Company to a wide range of regulation and other obligations, together with associated costs.  Like any other self-regulatory organization, SEFs are expected to regularly revise and interpret their rules, and such revisions and interpretations could adversely impact the Trust.  Even if the Trust opts not to trade on a SEF directly but instead through a broker, such trading may nevertheless require the Trust to consent to the SEF’s jurisdiction as a self-regulatory organization and to be subject to the SEF’s rulebook, which could adversely impact the Trust.

Although the Trust and Campbell & Company are subject to regulation by the CFTC, the Trust is not an investment company subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940.  Accordingly, you do not have the protections afforded by that statute which, for example, requires investment companies to have a majority of disinterested directors and regulates the relationship between the adviser and the investment company.

While Campbell & Company is registered with the CFTC as a commodity trading advisor and is subject to regulation by the CFTC, Campbell & Company is exempt from certain requirements of CFTC registration in reliance upon an exemption provided under CFTC Rule 4.7.  Therefore, neither the Trust nor the Unitholders have the full benefit of the protections afforded by, nor is Campbell & Company fully subject to the restrictions contained in, such CFTC registration and regulations.

Investors are taxed each year on their share of the Trust’s income and gain, if any, irrespective of whether they redeem any Units or receive any cash distribution from the Trust. Campbell & Company has the authority to make such distributions at any time in its sole discretion.

All performance information included in this Form 10K is presented on a pre-tax basis; the investors (other than tax-exempt investors) who experienced such performance had to pay the related taxes from other sources.

Investors may be required to pay tax on their allocable share of the Trust’s ordinary income, which in the case of the Trust is the Trust’s interest income, gain on some foreign futures contracts, and certain other investment assets, even though the Trust incurs overall losses. Capital losses of individual taxpayers can be used only to offset capital gains and, in the case of non-corporate investors, $3,000 of ordinary income each year. Consequently, if an individual investor were allocated $5,000 of ordinary income and $10,000 of capital losses, the investor would owe tax on $2,000 of ordinary income even though the investor would have a $5,000 economic loss for the year. The remaining $7,000 capital loss could be used in subsequent years to offset capital gain and ordinary income, but subject to the same annual limitation on its deductibility against ordinary income.

Although the Trust treats the management and performance fees paid to Campbell & Company as ordinary and necessary business expenses, upon an IRS audit, the Trust may be required to treat such fees as “investment advisory fees” if the Trust’s trading activities did not constitute a trade or business for tax purposes. If the Investor’s share of expenses were deemed to be investment advisory fees, a non-corporate Investor’s tax liability would likely increase. In addition, upon audit, a portion of the management fees might be treated as a non-deductible syndication cost or might be treated as a reduction in the Trust’s capital gain or as an increase in the Trust’s capital loss. If the management fees were so treated, an Investor’s tax liability would likely increase.

Absent an election, any audit adjustment to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit of a partnership (and any partner’s distributive share thereof) is determined, and taxes, interest, or penalties attributable thereto are assessed and collected, at the partnership level. Consult with your tax advisor with respect to these changes and their potential impact on your investment in the Trust.

The Trust is subject to substantial charges payable irrespective of profitability, in addition to performance fees which are payable based on the Trust’s profitability. Included in these charges are brokerage fees and operating expenses. On the Trust’s forward trading, “bid-ask” spreads are incorporated into the pricing of forward contracts by the counterparties in addition to the brokerage fees paid by the Trust. It is not possible to quantify the “bid-ask” spreads paid by the Trust because the Trust cannot determine the profit its counterparty is making on the forward transactions. Such spreads can at times be significant.

The institutions with which the Trust trades or invests may encounter financial difficulties that impair the operational capabilities or the capital position of the Trust. A futures broker is generally required by U.S. law to segregate all funds received from such broker’s customers from such broker’s proprietary assets. If the futures broker did not do so to the full extent required by law, the assets of the Trust might not be fully protected in the event of the bankruptcy of the futures broker. Furthermore, in the event of the futures broker’s bankruptcies, the Trust could be limited to recovering only a pro rata share of all available funds segregated on behalf of the futures broker’s combined customer accounts, even though certain property specifically traceable to the Trust (for example, Treasury bills deposited by the Trust with the futures broker as margin) was held by the futures broker. The futures brokers have been the subject of regulatory and private causes of action, as described under “The Futures Broker” section of the Prospectus.

Although Campbell & Company regularly monitors the financial condition of the counterparties it uses, if the Trust’s counterparties were to become insolvent or the subject of liquidation proceedings in the United States (either under the Securities Investor Protection Act of the United States Bankruptcy Code), there exists the risk that the recovery of the Trust’s assets from such counterparty will be delayed or be a value less than the value of the assets originally entrusted to such counterparty.

The Trust is subject to the risk that its major institutional investors may be compelled to redeem or that the Trust’s counterparties or brokers will be required to restrict the amount of credit previously granted to the Trust due to their own financial difficulties, resulting in forced liquidation of substantial portions of the Trust’s trading program.

Campbell & Company has consulted with counsel, accountants and other experts regarding the formation and operation of the Trust. No counsel has been appointed to represent the Investors in connection with the offering of the Units. Accordingly, each prospective investor should consult his own legal, tax and financial advisers regarding the desirability of an investment in the Trust.

Investors are not entitled to participate in the management of the Trust or the conduct of its business. Rather, the Trust is wholly dependent upon the services of the managing operator. There can be no assurance that such services will be available for any length of time following the term of the Advisory Agreement. Furthermore, the incapacity of the managing operator’s principals could have a material and adverse effect on the managing operator’s ability to discharge its obligations under the Advisory Agreement. However, there is no individual principal at Campbell & Company whose absence would result in a material adverse effect on Campbell & Company’s ability to adequately carry out its advisory responsibilities.

Campbell & Company may withdraw from the Trust upon 90 days’ notice, which would cause the Trust to terminate. Other events, such as a long-term substantial loss suffered by the Trust, could also cause the Trust to terminate before the expiration of its stated term. This could cause you to liquidate your investments and disrupt the overall maturity and timing of your investment portfolio. If the registrations with the CFTC or memberships in the National Futures Association of Campbell & Company or the futures broker were revoked or suspended, such entity would no longer be able to provide services to the Trust.

Investors may transfer or assign Units only upon 30 days’ prior written notice to Campbell & Company and only if Campbell & Company is satisfied that the transfer complies with applicable laws and would not result in adverse legal or tax consequences for the Trust. A transferee shall not become a substituted Investor without the written consent of the Managing Operator. See “Appendix A - ThirdFourth Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement” in the Prospectus.

Campbell & Company anticipates that the underlying assets of the Trust may be considered for purposes of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended (“ERISA”), and Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), to be assets of certain employee benefit plans and other Plans that purchase Units. Under such circumstances, the investments of the Trust and the activities of Campbell & Company will be subject to and, in certain cases, limited by, ERISA and the Code. Accordingly, all investors should carefully read “Investment by Employee Benefit Plans” in Part TwoOne of the Prospectus.

When considering an investment in the Trust of the assets of an employment benefit plan subject to Title I of ERISA, a fiduciary with respect to such plan should consider, among other things: (i) the definition of “Plan assets” under section 3(42) of ERISA and the regulations issued by the Department of Labor (“DOL”) regarding the definition of Plan assets; (ii) whether the investment satisfies the diversification requirements of Section 404(a)(1) of ERISA; (iii) whether the investment satisfies the prudence requirements of Section 404(a)(1) of ERISA; and (iv) that there will be no secondary market in which such fiduciary can sell or otherwise dispose of the Units.

The Trust is a single-advisor managed futures fund. Potential investors should understand that many managed futures funds are structured as multi-advisor funds in order to attempt to control risk and reduce volatility through combining advisors whose historical performance records have exhibited a significant degree of non-correlation with each other. As a single-advisor managed futures fund, the Trust may have increased performance volatility and a higher risk of loss than investment vehicles employing multiple advisors.

Campbell & Company employs a speculative strategy for the Trust, and receives performance fees based on the trading profits earned by it for the Trust. Campbell & Company would not agree to manage the Trust’s account in the absence of such a performance fee arrangement. Accordingly, Campbell & Company may make investments that are riskier than might be made if the Trust’s assets were managed by Campbell & Company that did not require performance-based compensation.

Campbell & Company reserves the right to make distributions of profits of the Trust to the Investors at any time in its sole discretion in order to control the growth of the assets under Campbell & Company’s management. Investors will have no choice in receiving these distributions as income, and may receive little notice that these distributions are being made. Distributions may be made at an inopportune time for the Investors.

Campbell & Company’s strategies are dependent to a significant degree on the proper functioning of its internal computer systems. Accordingly, systems failures, whether due to third party failures upon which such systems are dependent or the failure of Campbell & Company’s hardware or software, could disrupt trading or make trading impossible until such failure is remedied. Any such failure, and consequential inability to trade (even for a short time), could, in certain market conditions, cause the Trust to experience significant trading losses or to miss opportunities for profitable trading. Additionally, any such failures could cause a temporary delay in reports to investors.

Campbell & Company’s strategies are dependent to a significant degree on the receipt of timely and accurate market data from third party vendors. Accordingly, the failure to receive such data in a timely manner or the receipt of inaccurate data, whether due to the acts or omissions of such third party vendors or otherwise, could disrupt trading to the detriment of the Trust or make trading impossible until such failure or inaccuracy is remedied. Any such failure or inaccuracy could, in certain market conditions, cause the Trust to experience significant trading losses, effect trades in a manner which it otherwise would not have done, or miss opportunities for profitable trading. For example, the receipt of inaccurate market data may cause Campbell & Company to establish (or exit) a position which it otherwise would not have established (or exited), or fail to establish (or exit) a position which it otherwise would have established (or exited), and any subsequent correction of such inaccurate data may cause Campbell & Company to reverse such action or inaction, all of which may ultimately be to the detriment of the Trust.

With the increased use of technologies such as the Internet to conduct business, Campbell & Company is susceptible to operational, information security and related risks. In general, cyber incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. Cyber-attacks include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems (e.g., through “hacking” or malicious software coding) for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. Cyber-attacks may also be carried out in a manner that does not require gaining unauthorized access, such as causing denial-of-service attacks on websites (i.e., efforts to make network services unavailable to intended users). Cyber security failures or breaches by Campbell & Company, and other service providers (including, but not limited to custodians), and the issuers of securities in which Campbell & Company invests, have the ability to cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses, interference with Campbell & Company ability to calculate its net asset value, impediments to trading, violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, or additional compliance costs. In addition, substantial costs may be incurred in order to prevent any cyber incidents in the future. While Campbell & Company has established business continuity plans in the event of, and risk management systems to prevent, such cyber-attacks, there are inherent limitations in such plans and systems including the possibility that certain risks have not been identified. Furthermore, Campbell & Company cannot control the cyber security plans and systems put in place by service providers to Campbell & Company and issuers in which Campbell & Company invests. Campbell & Company and its clients could be negatively impacted as a result.

Selling agents will be entitled to ongoing compensation as a result of their clients remaining in the Trust, so a conflict exists between the selling agent’s interest in maximizing compensation and in advising its clients to make investment decisions in the client’s best interests.

Under the Trust’s constituent document and pursuant to the service contracts, Campbell & Company and the service providers have the right to be indemnified for any liability or expense they incur, assuming that they have satisfied their standard of care and have not materially breached the applicable agreement(s).  That means an indemnitee may require the assets of the Trust to be sold in order to cover losses or liability suffered by it with respect to the Trust.  Any sale of that kind would reduce the value of the Units of the Trust.

Certain of the strategies which may be implemented on behalf of the Trust rely on the financial information made available by the issuers in which the Trust invests. Campbell & Company has no ability to independently verify the financial information disseminated by the thousands of issuers in which the Trust may invest and is dependent upon the integrity of both the management of these issuers and the financial reporting process in general. Recent events have demonstrated the material losses which investors such as the Trust can incur as a result of corporate mismanagement, fraud and accounting irregularities.

The Trust is required to make substantial profits in order to avoid depletion or exhaustion of its assets from fees and expenses.  In addition, the performance fee paid to Campbell & Company by each Series of the Trust is based on both realized and unrealized gains and losses as of the end of the applicable period. Consequently, performance fees could be paid on unrealized gains that may never be realized by any of the Trust’s Series of Units.

Campbell & Company has the right to redeem all or any portion of the Units of any Investor, for any reason or no reason, upon not less than ten (10) days’ prior written notice to the Investor; provided, however, that the Trust may require a redemption of all or any portion of any Investor’s Units as of any date without providing any prior notice to avoid causing the assets of the Trust to be “plan assets” within the meaning of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code. Amounts so redeemed will be calculated and paid as provided above for voluntary redemptions.

The Registrant does not use any physical properties in the conduct of its business. Its assets currently consist of futures and other contracts, cash, short-term time deposits and other fixed income securities.

Campbell & Company is not aware of any material legal proceedings to which the Registrant or Campbell & Company is a party or to which any of their assets are subject.

Units of Beneficial Interest are not publicly traded. Units may be transferred or redeemed subject to the conditions imposed by the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement. As of December 31, 2021,2022, there were 1,7981,986 Unitholders and 76,728.20389,254.537 Units of Beneficial Interest outstanding in Series A, 122117 Unitholders and 10,247.75910,002.807 Units of Beneficial Interest outstanding in Series B, 84180 Unitholders and 6,875.56414,967.333 Units of Beneficial Interest outstanding in Series D, and 276404 Unitholders and 9,386.73611,697.747 Units of Beneficial Interest outstanding in Series W of the Registrant.

Campbell & Company has sole discretion in determining what distributions, if any, the Registrant will make to its Unitholders. Campbell & Company has not made any distributions as of the date hereof.

The Registrant has no securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

Not Applicable.

The Campbell Fund Trust (the “Trust”) is a business trust organized on January 2, 1996 under the Delaware Business Trust Act, which was replaced by the Delaware Statutory Trust Act as of September 1, 2002. The Trust is a successor to the Campbell Fund Limited Partnership (formerly known as the Commodity Trend Fund) which began trading operations in January 1972. The Trust currently trades in the U.S. and international futures, forward and centrally cleared swap markets under the sole direction of Campbell & Company, LP, the managing operator of the Trust. Specifically, the Trust trades in a diverse array of global assets, including global interest rates, stock indices, currencies, credit and commodities. The Trust is an actively managed account with speculative trading profits as its objective.

Effective August 31, 2008, the Trust began offering Series A, Series B, and Series W Units. The units in the Trust prior to that date became Series B Units. Series B Units are only available for additional investment by existing holders of Series B Units. Effective August 1, 2017, the Trust began offering Series D units.

As of December 31, 2021,2022, the aggregate capitalization of the Trust was $297,382,219$476,068,601 with Series A, Series B, Series D and Series W comprising $222,737,822, $32,886,235, $8,222,341$352,416,060, $43,597,613, $23,615,197 and $33,535,821,$56,439,731, respectively, of the total.  The Net Asset Value per Unit was $2,902.95$3,948.44 for Series A, $3,209.12$4,358.54 for Series B, $1,195.88$1,577.78 for Series D and $3,572.68$4,824.84 for Series W.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Management believes that the estimates utilized in preparing the financial statements are reasonable and prudent; however, actual results could differ from those estimates. The Trust’s significant accounting policies are described in detail in Note 1 of the Financial Statements.

The Trust records all investments at fair value in its financial statements, with changes in fair value reported as a component of realized and change in unrealized trading gain (loss) in the Statements of Operations. Generally, fair values are based on market prices; however, in certain circumstances, estimates are involved in determining fair value in the absence of an active market closing price (i.e., forward contracts which are traded in the inter-bank market).

The Trust will raise additional capital only through the sale of Units offered pursuant to the continuing offering, and does not intend to raise any capital through borrowing. Due to the nature of the Trust’s business, it will make no capital expenditures and will have no capital assets which are not operating capital or assets.

The Trust generally maintains 60% to 75% of its net asset value in cash, cash equivalents or other liquid positions in its cash management program over and above that needed to post as collateral for trading. These funds are available to meet redemptions each month. After redemptions and additions are taken into account each month, the trade levels of the Trust are adjusted and positions in the instruments the Trust trades are added or liquidated on a pro-rata basis to meet those increases or decreases in trade levels.

Most United States futures exchanges limit fluctuations in futures contracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or “daily limits.” During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. Once the price of a futures contract has reached the daily limit for that day, positions in that contract can neither be taken nor liquidated. Futures prices have occasionally moved to the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Similar occurrences could prevent the Trust from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions and subject the Trust to substantial losses which could exceed the margin initially committed to such trades. In addition, even if futures prices have not moved the daily limit, the Trust may not be able to execute futures trades at favorable prices, if little trading in such contracts is taking place. Other than these limitations on liquidity, which are inherent in the Trust’s futures trading operations, the Trust’s assets are expected to be highly liquid.

Approximately 10% to 30% of the Trust’s assets normally are committed as required margin for futures contracts and held by the futures brokers, although the amount committed may vary significantly. Such assets are maintained in the form of cash or U.S. Treasury Bills in segregated accounts with the futures brokers pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act and regulations thereunder. Approximately 5% to 15% of the Trust’s assets are deposited with the over-the-counter counterparty or centrally cleared in order to initiate and maintain forward contracts. Such assets are not held in segregation or otherwise regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act, unless such over-the-counter counterparty is registered as a futures commission merchant. These assets are held either in U.S. government securities or short-term time deposits with U.S.-regulated bank affiliates of the over-the-counter counterparty.

The managing operator deposits the majority of those assets of the Trust that are not required to be deposited as margin with the futures brokers and over-the-counter counterparties in a custodial account with Northern Trust Company. The assets deposited in the custodial account with Northern Trust Company are segregated. Such custodial account constitutes approximately 60% to 75% of the Trust’s assets and are invested directly by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC (“PNC”). PNC is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. PNC does not guarantee any interest or profits will accrue on the Trust’s assets in the custodial account. PNC invest the assets according to agreed upon investment guidelines that first preserve capital, second allow for sufficient liquidity, and third provide a yield beyond the risk-free rate. Investments can include, but are not limited to, (i) U.S. Government Securities, Government Agency Securities, Municipal Securities, banker acceptances and certificates of deposits; (ii) commercial paper; (iii) short-term investment grade corporate debt; and (iv) Asset Backed Securities.

The Trust occasionally receives margin calls (requests to post more collateral) from its futures brokers or over-the-counter counterparty, which are met by moving the required portion of the assets held in the custody account at Northern Trust Company to the margin accounts. In the past three years, the Trust has not needed to liquidate any position as a result of a margin call.

The Trust’s assets are not and will not be, directly or indirectly, commingled with the property of any other person in violation of law or invested in or loaned to Campbell & Company or any affiliated entities.

The term “off-balance sheet risk” refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in future obligation or loss. The Trust trades in futures, forward and swap contracts and is therefore a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts there exists a risk to the Trust, market risk, that such contracts may be significantly influenced by market conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures interests positions of the Trust at the same time, and if the Trust’s trading advisor was unable to offset futures interests positions of the Trust, the Trust could lose all of its assets and the Unitholders would realize a 100% loss. Campbell & Company, the managing operator (who also acts as trading advisor), minimizes market risk through real-time monitoring of open positions, diversification of the portfolio and maintenance of a margin-to-equity ratio that rarely exceeds 30% however, these precautions may not be effective in limiting the risk of loss.

In addition to market risk, in entering into futures, forward and swap contracts there is a credit risk that a counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to the Trust. The counterparty for futures contracts and centrally cleared swap contracts traded in the United States and on most foreign exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with such exchange. In general, clearinghouses are backed by the corporate members of the clearinghouse who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members, like some foreign exchanges, it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions.

In the case of forward contracts, which are traded on the interbank market rather than on exchanges, the counterparty is generally a single bank or other financial institution, rather than a group of financial institutions; thus there may be a greater counterparty credit risk. Campbell & Company trades for the Trust only with those counterparties which it believes to be creditworthy. All positions of the Trust are valued each day at fair value. There can be no assurance that any clearing member, clearinghouse or other counterparty will be able to meet its obligations to the Trust.

The Trust invests in futures, forward currency, and centrally cleared swap contracts. The market value of futures (exchange-traded) contracts is determined by the various futures exchanges, and reflects the settlement price for each contract as of the close of the last business day of the reporting period. The fair value of forward (non-exchange traded) contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) of the last business day of the reporting period.  The fair value of centrally cleared swap contracts is determined by using currency market quotations provided by an independent external pricing source.

The returns for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 2020 and 20192020 for Series A were 12.52%36.01%, 0.46%12.52% and 7.75%0.46%, Series B were 13.09%35.82%, 0.97%13.09% and 8.29%0.97%, Series D were 12.83%31.93%, 1.73%12.83% and 7.79%1.73% and Series W were 14.80%35.05%, 2.50%14.80% and 9.93%2.50% respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 2020 and 2019,2020, the Trust accrued management fees in the amounts of $8,539,297, $5,813,446, $8,472,866, and $12,792,990,$8,472,866, respectively, and paid management fees in the amounts of $8,243,954, $5,795,404, $8,990,885, and $12,901,756,$8,990,885, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 2020 and 2019,2020, the Trust accrued sales commissions in the amounts of $7,327,108, $5,162,106, $2,990,891, and $0,$2,990,891, respectively, and paid sales commissions in the amounts of $7,108,300, $5,159,066, $2,573,244, and $0,$2,573,244, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 2020 and 2019,2020, the Trust accrued performance fees in the amounts of $20,446,581, $54,801, $0, and $21,165$0 respectively, and paid performance fees in the amounts of $20,446,581, $54,801, $0, and $21,165.$0.

Of the 12.52% return for the year ended December 31, 2021 for Series A, approximately 17.93% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.39% due to investment income, offset by approximately (5.80)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series A.

Of the 13.09% return for year ended December 31, 2021 for Series B, approximately 17.93% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.39% due to investment income, offset by approximately (5.23)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions and operating costs borne by Series B.

Of the 12.83% return for the year ended December 31, 2021 for Series D, approximately 17.93% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.39% due to investment income, offset by approximately (5.49)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, performance fees, sales commissions, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series D.

Of the 14.80% return for the year ended December 31, 2021 for Series W, approximately 17.93% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.39% due to investment income, offset by approximately (3.52)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series W.

An analysis of the 17.93% gross trading gains for the Trust for the year by sector is as follows:

Of the 0.46% return for the year ended December 31, 2020 for Series A, approximately 5.03% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 1.10% due to investment income, offset by approximately (5.67)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series A.

Of the 0.97% return for year ended December 31, 2020 for Series B, approximately 5.03% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 1.10% due to investment income, offset by approximately (5.16)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions and operating costs borne by Series B.

Of the 1.73% return for the year ended December 31, 2020 for Series D, approximately 5.03% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 1.10% due to investment income, offset by approximately (4.40)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series D.

Of the 2.50% return for the year ended December 31, 2020 for Series W, approximately 5.03% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 1.10% due to investment income, offset by approximately (3.63)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series W.

An analysis of the 5.03% gross trading gains for the Trust for the year by sector is as follows:

The Trust is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or a substantial amount of the Trust’s assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Trust’s main line of business.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair market value of the Trust’s open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Trust’s market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of exchange rates, interest rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Trust’s open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.

The Trust rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Trust’s past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.

Materiality as used in this section, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and the potential losses caused by such movements, taking into account the leverage and multiplier features of the Trust’s market sensitive instruments.

The Trust’s risk exposure in the various market sectors traded is estimated in terms of Value at Risk (VaR). The Trust estimates VaR using a model based upon historical simulation (with a confidence level of 97.5%) which involves constructing a distribution of hypothetical daily changes in the value of a trading portfolio. The VaR model takes into account linear exposures to risks, including equity and commodity prices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, credit, and correlation among these variables. The hypothetical changes in portfolio value are based on daily percentage changes observed in key market indices or other market factors to which the portfolio is sensitive. The Trust’s VaR at a one day 97.5% confidence level corresponds to the negative change in portfolio value that, based on observed market risk factors, would have been exceeded once in 40 trading days or one day in 40. VaR typically does not represent the worst case outcome.

The Trust uses approximately one quarter of daily market data and revalues its portfolio for each of the historical market moves that occurred over this time period. This generates a probability distribution of daily “simulated profit and loss” outcomes. The VaR is the 2.5 percentile of this distribution.

The VaR for a sector represents the 2.5 percentile of outcomes for the aggregate exposures associated with that sector alone. The current methodology used to calculate the aggregate VaR represents the VaR of the Trust’s open positions across all market sectors, and is less than the sum of the VaRs for all such market sectors due to the diversification benefit across asset classes.

The Trust’s VaR computations are based on the risk representation of the underlying benchmark for each instrument or contract and does not distinguish between exchange and non-exchange dealer-based instruments. It is also not based on exchange and/or dealer-based maintenance margin requirements.

VaR models, including the Trust’s, are continually evolving as trading portfolios become more diverse and modeling techniques and systems capabilities improve. Please note that the VaR model is used to numerically quantify market risk for historic reporting purposes only and is not utilized by the Trust in its daily risk management activities. Please further note that VaR as described above may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other entities.

Because the business of the Trust is the speculative trading of futures, forwards, and swaps, the composition of the Trust’s trading portfolio can change significantly over any given time period, or even within a single trading day, which could positively or negatively materially impact market risk as measured by VaR.

The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Trust’s open positions by market category as of December 31, 2022, 2021 2020 and 20192020 and the trading gains/losses by market category for the years then ended.

Of the 12.52% return for the year ended December 31, 2021 for Series A, approximately 17.93% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.39% due to investment income, offset by approximately (5.80)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series A.

Of the 13.09% return for year ended December 31, 2021 for Series B, approximately 17.93% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.39% due to investment income, offset by approximately (5.23)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions and operating costs borne by Series B.

Of the 12.83% return for the year ended December 31, 2021 for Series D, approximately 17.93% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.39% due to investment income, offset by approximately (5.49)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, performance fees, sales commissions, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series D.

Of the 14.80% return for the year ended December 31, 2021 for Series W, approximately 17.93% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 0.39% due to investment income, offset by approximately (3.52)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series W.

Of the 0.46% return for the year ended December 31, 2020 for Series A, approximately 5.03% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 1.10% due to investment income, offset by approximately (5.67)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series A.

Of the 0.97% return for year ended December 31, 2020 for Series B, approximately 5.03% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 1.10% due to investment income, offset by approximately (5.16)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions, and operating costs borne by Series B.

Of the 1.73% return for the year ended December 31, 2020 for Series D, approximately 5.03% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 1.10% due to investment income, offset by approximately (4.40)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series D.

Of the 2.50% return for the year ended December 31, 2020 for Series W, approximately 5.03% was due to trading gains (before commissions) and approximately 1.10% due to investment income, offset by approximately (3.63)% due to brokerage fees, management fees, sales commissions, offering costs and operating costs borne by Series W.

The following limitations of VaR as an assessment of market risk should be noted:

VaR is not necessarily representative of historic risk nor should it be used to predict the Trust’s future financial performance or its ability to manage and monitor risk. There can be no assurance that the Trust’s actual losses on a particular day will not exceed the VaR amounts indicated or that such losses will not occur more than once in 40 trading days.

The Trust has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances not needed for margin. However, these balances (as well as the market risk they represent) are immaterial. The Trust also has non-trading market risk as a result of investing a portion of its available assets in U.S. Treasury Bills held at the broker and over-the-counter counterparty. The market risk represented by these investments is minimal. Finally, the Trust has non-trading market risk on fixed income securities held as part of its cash management program. The cash manager will use its best endeavors in the management of the assets of the Trust but provide no guarantee that any profit or interest will accrue to the Trust as a result of such management.

The following represent the primary trading risk exposures of the Trust as of December 31, 20212022 by market sector.

The Trust’s currency exposure is to exchange rate fluctuations, primarily fluctuations which disrupt the historical pricing relationships between different currencies and currency pairs. These fluctuations are influenced by interest rate changes as well as political and general economic conditions. The Trust trades in a large number of currencies, including cross-rates — i.e., positions between two currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. Campbell & Company does not anticipate that the risk profile of the Trust’s currency sector will change significantly in the future.

Interest rate movements directly affect the price of the sovereign bond positions and interest rate swap contracts held by the Trust and indirectly the value of its stock index and currency positions. Interest rate movements in one country as well as relative interest rate movements between countries materially impact the Trust’s profitability. Campbell & Company does not anticipate that the risk profile of the Trust’s interest rate sector will change significantly in the future.

The Trust’s primary equity exposure is to equity price risk in the G-7 countries as well as Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, Netherlands, India, South Africa and Sweden. The stock index futures traded by the Trust are by law limited to futures on broadly based indices. The Trust is primarily exposed to the risk of adverse price trends or static markets in the major U.S., European and Japanese indices. Markets that trade in a narrow range could result in the Trust’s positions being “whipsawed” into numerous small losses.

The Trust’s primary credit exposure is through fluctuations in the credit worthiness of a particular reference entity, basket of reference entities, or an index.

The Trust’s primary energy market exposure is to natural gas, crude oil and derivative product price movements often resulting from international political developments and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and the perceived outcome. Oil and gas prices can be volatile and substantial profits and losses have been and are expected to continue to be experienced in this market.

The Trust’s metals market exposure is to fluctuations in the price of aluminum, copper, gold, lead, nickel, palladium, platinum, silver and zinc.

The Trust’s agricultural exposure is to fluctuations of the price of cattle, cocoa, coffee, corn, cotton, hogs, soy, sugar and wheat.

The following were the primary non-trading risk exposures of the Trust as of December 31, 2021.2022.

The Trust’s primary foreign currency balances are in Australian Dollar, British Pounds, Canadian Dollar, Euros, Hong Kong Dollar, Japanese Yen, Singapore Dollar, South African Rand and Swedish Krona. The Trust controls the non-trading risk of these balances by regularly converting these balances back into dollars (no less frequently than twice a month, and more frequently if a particular foreign currency balance becomes unusually large).

The Trust’s primary market exposure in instruments (other than treasury positions described in the subsequent section) held other than for trading is in its fixed income portfolio. The cash manager, PNC, has authority to make certain investments on behalf of the Trust. All securities purchased by the cash manager on behalf of the Trust will be held in the Trust’s custody account at the custodian. The cash manager will use its best endeavors in the management of the assets of the Trust but provides no guarantee that any profit or interest will accrue to the Trust as a result of such management.

The Trust also has market exposure in its U.S. Treasury Bill portfolio. The Trust holds U.S. Treasury Bills with maturities no longer than six months. Violent fluctuations in prevailing interest rates could cause minimal mark-to-market losses on the Trust’s U.S. Treasury Bills, although substantially all of these short-term investments are held to maturity.

The means by which the Trust and Campbell & Company, severally, attempt to manage the risk of the Trust’s open positions is essentially the same in all market categories traded. Campbell & Company applies risk management policies to its trading which generally limit the total exposure that may be taken per “risk unit” of assets under management. In addition, Campbell & Company follows diversification guidelines (often formulated in terms of the balanced volatility between markets and correlated groups), as well as reducing position sizes dynamically in response to trading losses.

The Trust is unaware of any (i) anticipated known demands, commitments or capital expenditures; (ii) material trends, favorable or unfavorable, in its capital resources; or (iii) trends or uncertainties that will have a material effect on operations. From time to time, certain regulatory agencies have proposed increased margin requirements on futures contracts. Because the Trust generally will use a small percentage of assets as margin, the Trust does not believe that any increase in margin requirements, as proposed, will have a material effect on the Trust’s operations.

Financial statements meeting the requirements of Regulation S-X appear beginning on Page 5557 of this report.

None.

Campbell & Company, the managing operator of the Trust, with the participation of the managing operator’s chief executive officer and managing director, operations and finance, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) with respect to the Trust as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on their evaluation, the chief executive officer and managing director, operations and finance have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes in the managing operator’s internal control over financial reporting applicable to the Trust identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting applicable to the Trust.

Campbell & Company, LP (“Campbell & Company”), the managing operator of the Trust, is responsible for the management of the Trust. Management of Campbell & Company (“Management”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Trust’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021.2022. In making this assessment, Management used the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). As a result of this assessment and based on the criteria in the COSO framework, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2021,2022, the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

None.

The Registrant has no directors or executive officers. The Registrant has no employees. It is managed by Campbell & Company in its capacity as managing operator. Campbell & Company has been registered as a commodity pool operator (CPO) since September 1982. Its main business address is 2850 Quarry Lake Drive, Baltimore, Maryland, 21209, (410) 413-2600. Campbell & Company’s directors and executive officers are as follows:

Dr. Kevin D. Cole, born in 1972, joined Campbell & Company in October 2003, served as Chief Investment Officer of both Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor and an SEC-registered investment adviser, since June 2017, and assumed the combined role of Chief Executive Officer & Chief Investment Officer (CEO, CIO) in January of 2022. In his role as CEO, CIO, he is responsible for leading the firm’s overall strategic direction while also establishing and managing the firm’s investment research agenda. Dr. Cole has served on the Board of Directors and as an officer of Campbell & Company, LLC, the general partner of Campbell & Company, since January 2019. Since August 2018 Dr. Cole has served on the firm’s Executive Committee. Dr. Cole was appointed to the firm’s Investment Committee in January 2016. Dr. Cole formerly served as Deputy Chief Research Officer from January 2016 to June 2017; Director, Investment Strategies from October 2013 to December 2015; Research Manager from October 2006 to September 2013; and Senior Researcher from October 2003 to September 2006. Dr. Cole holds a B.A. in Economics from Georgetown University, and received a Ph.D. in Economics with a concentration in Finance from the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Cole was listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective March 20, 2017.

D. Keith Campbell, born in 1942, has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Campbell & Company since its inception in January 1972.  Mr. Campbell currently serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Campbell & Company, LLC, which is the general partner of Campbell & Company.  Since August 2018 Mr. Campbell has served on the firm’s Executive Committee.  Mr. Campbell served as the President of Campbell & Company until January 1994, and was Chief Executive Officer until January 1998.  Mr. Campbell has acted as a commodity trading advisor since January 1972 when, as general partner of the Campbell Fund Trust, a limited partnership engaged in commodity futures trading, he assumed sole responsibility for trading decisions made on its behalf.  Since then, he has applied various technical trading models to numerous discretionary futures trading accounts.  Mr. Campbell, as a sole proprietor, has been registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator from June 30, 1982 to May 14, 2020 and a NFA Associate Member from July 1, 1984 to May 14, 2020.  Mr. Campbell became listed as a principal of Campbell & Company effective September 29, 1978 and as a NFA Associate Member and an Associated Person effective September 29, 1997 and October 29, 1997, respectively.  Mr. Campbell became listed as a principal of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC effective July 9, 2008.  With respect to Mr. Campbell’s previously-referenced commodity pool operator registration, Mr. Campbell was listed as a Principal effective March 10, 1975 through May 14, 2020 and was registered as an Associated Person effective February 28, 2013 through May 14, 2020 and a Forex Associated Person effective  March 15, 2013 through July 7, 2019.

Thomas P. Lloyd, born in 1959, joined Campbell & Company in September 2005 as General Counsel and Executive Vice President-Legal and Compliance.  Since December 2018, Mr. Lloyd has served as General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, and Secretary of both Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor, and an SEC-registered investment adviser. In this capacity, he is involved in all aspects of legal affairs, compliance and regulatory oversight, including, between April 2007 and August 2018, overseeing Campbell & Company’s fund administration function. Since January 2019, Mr. Lloyd has served on the Board of Directors of Campbell & Company, LLC, the general partner of Campbell & Company.  Between August and December 2018, Mr. Lloyd served as Co-General Counsel of Campbell & Company, LP.  Mr. Lloyd served as the Secretary of Campbell & Company between October 2011 and August 2018.  Since August 2017, Mr. Lloyd has served as an officer of Campbell & Company Delaware, LLC, the general partner of the Campbell Equity Alpha Onshore Fund, LP, a limited partnership formed in Delaware, and the Campbell Equity Alpha Cayman, LP and the Campbell Equity Alpha Master Fund LP, each an exempted limited partnership registered in the Cayman Islands.  Since November 2014, Mr. Lloyd has served as an officer of Campbell & Company, LLC, which is the general partner of Campbell & Company.  Mr. Lloyd is a member of the Board of Directors of Campbell Core Offshore Limited and Campbell Advantage Offshore Limited, each an international business company incorporated in the Cayman Islands.  Mr. Lloyd served as the Secretary and Assistant Treasurer, between September 2005 and August 2018, and as the General Counsel, between September 2013 and August 2018, of Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, a registered commodity trading advisor and an SEC-registered investment adviser.  Mr. Lloyd served as a Director, Vice President, and Secretary of Campbell Financial Services, LLC, an SEC-registered broker-dealer and FINRA member, between October 2009 and August 2018.  Mr. Lloyd also served as Chief Compliance Officer of Campbell Financial Services, LLC between October 2009 and September 2013.  In November 2012 Mr. Lloyd was appointed as President of Campbell Financial Services, LLC and held the position until April 2014.  Mr. Lloyd was the General Counsel of Campbell Financial Services, LLC between April 2014 and August 2018. From July 1999 to September 2005, Mr. Lloyd was employed by Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., a broker/dealer subsidiary of a global investment bank, in several positions, including Managing Director and head of the legal group for Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, the Private Client Division of Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.  Mr. Lloyd holds a B.A. in Economics from the University of Maryland and a J.D. from the University of Baltimore School of Law.  Mr. Lloyd is a member of the Bars of the State of Maryland and the United States Supreme Court.  Mr. Lloyd has been listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC since January 2, 2019.  Mr. Lloyd was previously listed as a Principal of Campbell & Company and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC from October 20, 2005 to August 1, 2018 and December 12, 2005 to August 15, 2018, respectively.  Mr. Lloyd became registered as a NFA Associate Member and an Associated Person of Campbell & Company effective August 30, 2010. Mr. Lloyd was designated as a Branch Manager of Campbell & Company, LP from January 15, 2020 until December 28, 2020.

John R. Radle, born in 1967, joined Campbell & Company in June 2005, and in January 2022 was appointed Chief Operating Officer of both Campbell & Company, LP and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Campbell & Company, LP, a registered commodity trading advisor and an SEC-registered investment adviser. In this capacity, Mr. Radle is responsible for overseeing the firm’s middle office, back office, and corporate finance functions. Mr. Radle was appointed to the Board of Directors and as an officer of Campbell & Company, LLC, the general partner of Campbell & Company, LP in January 2022. Mr. Radle has been a member of the Investment Committee and the Best Execution Committee since April 2013 and November 2006, respectively. Mr. Radle also served as the Equity Trading Manager from June 2005 to December 2010, Manager - Equity & Rule-Based Execution from December 2010 to October 2012, and Managing Director, Global Head of Trading from October 2012 to January 2022. In this capacity Mr. Radle provided oversight of all aspects of the firm’s trade activities and assessed trade algorithms. Mr. Radle holds a BBA in Finance from Texas Christian University. He also holds an MBA from Johns Hopkins University. Mr. Radle was listed as a principal of Campbell & Company, LP and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser LLC from June 2013 to September 2018. Mr. Radle became listed as a principal of Campbell & Company, LP and Campbell & Company Investment Adviser, LLC in January 2022. Mr. Radle became registered as a NFA Associate Member and an Associated Person of Campbell & Company, LP effective November 5, 2007 and November 15, 2007, respectively.

There has never been a material administrative, civil or criminal action brought against Campbell & Company or any of its directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons.

No individual is named as the “audit committee expert’ because no member of the Audit Committee (“Committee”) individually meets all five qualifications in the SEC definition of an “audit committee financial expert”; however, management has determined that the members of the Committee collectively possess the attributes necessary to perform this function.

Campbell & Company has adopted a code of ethics for its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Accounting Managers, and persons performing similar functions. A copy of the code of ethics may be obtained at no charge by written request to Campbell & Company’s corporate secretary, 2850 Quarry Lake Drive, Baltimore, Maryland 21209 or by calling 1-800-698-7235.

The Trust does not itself have any officers, directors or employees. The Trust pays management fees and performance fees to Campbell & Company. The directors and managing officers of Campbell & Company are remunerated by Campbell & Company in their respective positions. The directors and managing officers receive no “other compensation” from the Trust. There are no compensation plans or arrangements relating to a change in control of either the Trust or Campbell & Company.

Campbell & Company receives (i) a monthly management fee of 1/12 of 2% of the month-end net assets of the Series A Units, Series B Units, Series D Units and Series W Units without reductions for distributions, redemptions or withdrawals during said month, totaling approximately 2% of the average month-end net assets per year of the Series A Units, Series B Units, Series D Units and Series W Units; (ii) a monthly sales fee of 1/12 of 2% of the month-end net assets of the Series A Units and Series B Units without reductions for distributions, redemptions or withdrawals during said month, totaling approximately 2% of average month-end net assets per year of the Series A Units and Series B Units; (iii) a monthly sales fee of 1/12 of 0.75% of the month-end net assets of the Series D Units without reductions for distributions, redemptions or withdrawals during said month, totaling approximately 0.75% of average month-end net assets per year of the Series D Units; and (iv) a quarterly performance fee of 20% of the aggregate cumulative appreciation (if any) in the net asset value per unit of the Series A Units, Series B Units, Series D Units and Series W Units at the end of each quarter, exclusive of appreciation attributable to interest income, allocable to such Series of Units, and as adjusted for subscriptions and redemptions, on a cumulative high water mark basis, charged quarterly. In determining the fees in this paragraph, net assets shall not be reduced by the performance fees being calculated for such current period. In respect of each Series of Units, “aggregate cumulative appreciation” means the total increase in Unit value of such Series of Units from the commencement of trading, minus the total increase in Unit value of such Series of Units for all prior quarters, multiplied by the number of Units of such Series outstanding. The performance fee is paid only on profits attributable to each Series of Units outstanding. The performance fee is accrued monthly and paid quarterly.

See Item 11 – Executive Compensation and Item 12 – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters.

The principal accountant for the years ended December 31, 20212022 and 20202021 was Deloitte & Touche LLP.

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the Trust’s annual financial statements, for review of financial statements included in the Trust’s Forms 10-Q and other services normally provided in connection with regulatory filings for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 and 2020 were $229,125$278,425 and $229,125 , respectively.

None.

None.

None.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities of Campbell & Company, LP, the Managing Operator of the Registrant, indicated on March 25, 2022.