UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



Form 10-K


(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20212023

OR


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHEOF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to ________

Commission File Number 1-11460

graphic


Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics,Eterna Therapeutics Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware
 31-1103425
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

10355 Science Center Drive,1035 Cambridge Street, Suite 150, San Diego, California18A, Cambridge, MA 9212102141
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
 
(212) 582-1199
(Registrant’s telephone number, including Area Code)



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of Each Class
 
Trading Symbol(s)
 
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.005 par value
 BTXERNA
 The
Nasdaq StockCapital Market LLC

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  ☐ No  ☒
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.  Yes  ☐  No  ☒
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ☐Accelerated filer  ☐
Non-accelerated filer  ☒Smaller reporting company  ☒
 Emerging growth company  ☐
 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive- based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D- 1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒
 
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2021)2023), computed by reference to the closing sale price of the common stock on the Nasdaq StockCapital Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) on such date, was approximately $694$9.7 million. For purposes of this determination shares beneficially owned by executive officers, directors and ten percent stockholders have been excluded, which does not represent an admission by the registrant as to the affiliate status of such person.
 
As of April March 12, 2022, 2024, the registrant had 57,451,9375,410,331 shares of common stock outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference.
 
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item
Page

Part I
   
1.
1 
1A.28
1B.57
2.
57
3.57
4.59
  

Part II
   
5.60
6.60
7.60
7A.70
8.70
9.70
9A.70
9B.71
9C.71
   

Part III
   
10.72
11.72
12.72
13.72
14.72
   

Part IV
   
15.73
16.75

76

F-1
Item Page
 Part I 
   
1.
1
1A.
14
1B.
36
1C.
36
2.
37
3.
37
4.
37
   
 Part II 
   
5.
38
6.
38
7.
38
7A.
47
8.
47
9.
47
9A.
47
9B.
48
9C.
48
   
 Part III 
   
10.
49
11.
51
12.
59
13.
63
14.
63
   
 Part IV 
   
15.
65
16.
67
 68
 F-1

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”), Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements include statements related to future events, results, performance, prospects and opportunities, including statements related to our strategic plans, and targets, revenue generation, product availability and offerings, capital needs, capital expenditures, industry trends and our financial position. Forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us, on our current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and on the beliefs and assumptions of management. Forward looking statements often contain words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “could,” “targets,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our business, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements by their nature address matters that are, to different degrees, subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. For us, particular factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include those identified in the “Summary of Principal Risk Factors” below and the other risks and uncertainties described in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and described in other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission or SEC,(the “SEC”), including our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
 
Readers are urged not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are including this cautionary note to make applicable, and take advantage of, the safe harbor provisions of the PSLRA. Except as required by law, we do not undertake, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to disseminate, after the date hereof, any updates or revisions to any such forward-looking statements to reflect any change in expectations or events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statements are based.
 
We believe that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based upon reasonable assumptions at the time made. However, given the risks and uncertainties, you should not rely on any forward- lookingforward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results, developments or other outcomes. You should read these forward-looking statements with the understanding that we may be unable to achieve projected results, developments or other outcomes and that actual results, developments or other outcomes may be materially different from what we expect.
 
Unless stated otherwise indicatedor the context otherwise requires, all references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K “Brooklyn” refers to Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics,“Eterna” refer to Eterna Therapeutics Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly known as NTN Buzztime, Inc.), and “Brooklyn LLC” refers to Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Brooklyn. All references to “our company,“Eterna LLC” refer to Eterna Therapeutics LLC, and references to the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean Brooklynrefer to Eterna and its consolidated subsidiaries, including BrooklynEterna LLC, unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires.Novellus, Inc. and Novellus Therapeutics Limited.

SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL RISK FACTORS
 
You shouldBelow is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our securities speculative or risky. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face. We urge investors to carefully review and consider the additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, of principal risk factorsand other risks that we face, which can be found below together withunder the more detailed risk factors related to our business and industry described underheading “Risk Factors” contained in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The occurrence of any of the events discussed below could significantly and adversely affect10-K, together with other information in this report, before making investment decisions regarding our business, prospects, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows, which could result in a decline in the market price of our common stock.securities.
 
If we are not successful in attractingRisks Related to our Business and retaining highly qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy.Industry
We expect to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability.
We will require substantial additional capital to fund our operations, and if we fail to obtain the necessary financing, we may not be able to completecontinue as a going concern.
We have a limited operating history, have incurred significant losses since our inception and expect to continue to incur losses for the developmentforeseeable future, which, together with our limited financial resources and commercializationsubstantial capital requirements, make it difficult to assess our prospects.
We depend substantially, and expect in the future to continue to depend, on in-licensed intellectual property, and in particular on intellectual property we in-license from Factor Limited.
Our intellectual property rights may not adequately protect our business.
We or our licensors may be subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of any of our product candidates.the patents and other intellectual property that we own or license now or in the future.

We face business disruption and related risks resulting from the pandemic of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), which could have identified a material adverse effect onweakness in our internal control over financial reporting, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us, result in litigation and materially and adversely affect our business plan.and operating results.
Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures, cyber-attacks or a deficiency in our cyber-security.
We
If we are substantially dependent on the success of our internal development programsnot successful in attracting and our product pipeline candidatesretaining highly qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully complete clinical trials, receive regulatory approval or be successfully commercialized.implement our business strategy.
Our current or future
Risks Related to New, Cutting Edge Technologies
Because gene-editing and cell therapy product candidates that may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties when used alone or in combination with other approvedbe developed using our mRNA technology platform are based on novel technologies, we cannot assure that such products or investigational new drugs that could halt their clinical development, prevent their marketing approval, limit their commercial potential or result in significant negative consequences.will be successful.
If we fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could harm our business.
We face significantintense competition and ifrapid technological change and the possibility that our competitors may develop and market productstherapies that are more effective,advanced, safer or less expensivemore effective than any therapy we may develop in the future, which may adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to successfully develop and commercialize our products.
Negative public opinion and increased regulatory scrutiny of gene therapy and genetic research may damage public perception of product candidates we develop,that may be developed using our commercial opportunities will be negatively impacted.
We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third partiesmRNA technology platform or adversely affect our ability to conduct our clinical studies,business.
Risks Related to Ownership of our Common Stock
A substantial number of shares may be issued upon the exercise and/or conversion of outstanding securities, which would result in substantial dilution to the interests of our existing stockholders.
The terms of our outstanding convertible notes could limit our growth and those third partiesour ability to finance our operations, fund our capital needs, respond to changing conditions and engage in other business activities that may not perform satisfactorily, including failingbe in our best interests.
The requirement that we redeem our outstanding convertible notes in cash could adversely affect our business plan, liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our failure to meet deadlinesthe continued listing requirements of Nasdaq could result in a delisting of our common stock.
Anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law and provisions in our charter and bylaws could make a third-party acquisition of us difficult.
Risks Related to Regulatory Requirements and Our Intellectual Property
The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities are lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable. If potential strategic partners are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for the completiontheir product candidates, our business will be substantially harmed.
Healthcare legislative reform measures may have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of such studies.operations, and prospects.
If we are unable to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protection, for our products and product candidates, or if the scope of the patent and other intellectual property protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could developbusiness, financial condition, results of operations, and/or prospects may be materially and commercialize products similaradversely effected.
We cannot ensure that patent rights relating to inventions described and claimed in our pending patent applications will issue, or identical to ours,that our issued patents or patents that issue in the future will not be challenged and our ability to successfully commercialize ourrendered invalid and/or unenforceable.
Issued patents covering future products and product candidates that our strategic partners or collaborators may develop could be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged in court or in administrative proceedings.
Obtaining and maintaining patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.
If we do not obtain patent term extension for future products that our strategic partners or collaborators may successfully develop, our business may be adversely affected.materially harmed.
Changes in patent law in the United States and other jurisdictions could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect future products and product candidates that we or our strategic partners or collaborators may develop.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.
 
We may not identify relevant third-party patents or may incorrectly interpret the relevance, scope or expiration of a third-party patent, and our business, financial condition, results of operations, and/or prospects may be materially and adversely effected.
We may be subject to claims by third parties asserting that our employees or we have misappropriated their intellectual property or claiming ownership of what we regard as our own intellectual property.
We may be subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of our patents and other intellectual property.
We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents and other intellectual property rights, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.
PART I
 
ITEM 1.Business

Background

On March 25, 2021, BIT Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Brooklyn (then known as NTN Buzztime, Inc.) merged with and into Brooklyn LLC, with Brooklyn LLC surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Brooklyn. This transaction, which we refer to as the Merger, was completed in accordance with the terms of an agreement and plan of merger and reorganization dated August 12, 2020 among Brooklyn (then known as NTN Buzztime, Inc.), BIT Merger Sub, Inc. and Brooklyn LLC. In accordance with such agreement and plan of merger, on March 25, 2021, Brooklyn amended its restated certificate of incorporation in order to effect:

prior to the Merger, a reverse stock split of its common stock, par value $0.005 per share, at a ratio of one-for-two; and
following the Merger, a change in its corporate name from “NTN Buzztime, Inc.” to “Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc.”

On March 26, 2021, we sold the rights, title and interest in and to the assets relating to the business operated under the name “NTN Buzztime, Inc.” prior to the Merger to eGames.com Holdings LLC, or eGames.com, in exchange for eGames.com’s payment of a purchase price of $2.0 million and assumption of specified liabilities relating to such pre-Merger business. This transaction, which we refer to as the Disposition, was completed in accordance with the terms of an asset purchase agreement dated September 18, 2020, as amended, between us and eGames.com.

The Merger has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Under this method of accounting, Brooklyn LLC was deemed the “acquiring” company and Brooklyn (then known as NTN Buzztime, Inc.) was treated as the “acquired” company for financial reporting purposes. Operations prior to the Merger are those of Brooklyn LLC, and the historical financial statements of Brooklyn LLC became the historical financial statements of Brooklyn with respect to periods prior to the completion of the Merger.

Our principal executive offices are located at 10355 Science Center Drive, Suite 150, San Diego, CA 92121 and our phone number is (212) 582-1199. We maintain a website at www.brooklynitx.com. Information contained on, or accessible through, our website is not a part of and is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceuticallife science company focused on exploringcommitted to realizing the role that cytokine-based therapy can have on the immune system in treatingpotential of mRNA cell engineering to provide patients with cancer, bothtransformational new medicines.  We have in-licensed a portfolio of over 100 patents covering key mRNA cell engineering technologies, including technologies for mRNA cell reprogramming, mRNA gene editing, the NoveSliceTM and UltraSliceTM gene-editing proteins, and the ToRNAdoTM mRNA delivery system, which we collectively refer to as a single agentour “mRNA technology platform.” We refer to aspects of our mRNA technology platform as “mRNA delivery,” “mRNA gene editing” and in combination with other anti-cancer therapies.“mRNA cell reprogramming.” We are seeking to develop IRX-2, a novel cytokine-based therapy, to treat patients with cancer. We also are exploring opportunities to advance oncology, blood disorder, and monogenic disease therapies using gene-editing and cell therapylicense our mRNA technology through a license withplatform from Factor Bioscience Limited (“Factor Limited”) under an exclusive license agreement.
Objectives and Business Strategy
We believe that our proprietary technology platform can be used to develop novel pharmaceutical products to treat a broad range of diseases and address unmet medical needs.
In the short term, we are planning to derive revenue by leveraging our core intellectual property (“IP”) portfolio by licensing to our IP third parties in out-licensing or Factor,co-development arrangements. In addition, we are also planning to enhance our developmental activities through preclinical studies in selected indications.
In the mid-term, we are planning to transform our preclinical stage company into a clinical-stage company through IND-enabling studies, IND approval, and throughinitiation of our acquisitionfirst-in-human study. After achieving the initial milestones, we’ll seek to diversify our pipeline of Novellus, Inc.product candidates and Novellus, Ltd. in July 2021, whichstrengthen the mRNA technology platform with the goal of generating IND applications each year.
In the long term, we referaspire to as the Acquisition.

IRX-2

IRX-2 isbecome a mixed, human-derived cytokine producttherapeutics company with multiple active constituents including Interleukin-2, or IL2,approved gene and other key cytokines. Together, these cytokines are believed to signal, enhancecellular therapy products across multiple indications in oncology, autoimmune diseases, and restore immune function suppressed byrare diseases.
As discussed in more detail below, following receipt in June 2022 of the tumor, thus enabling the immune system to attack cancer cells, unlike many existing cancer therapies, which rely on targeting the cancer directly. IRX-2 is preparedresults from the supernatantINSPIRE phase 2 trial of pooledIRX-2, our only former product candidate, we determined to cease the development of IRX-2. We do not currently plan to develop any product candidates. In the future we may develop and advance product candidates, either internally and/or through strategic partnerships.
mRNA Delivery, Gene-Editing, and Cellular Medicines
mRNA Delivery
Nucleic acids, such as mRNA, can be used to induce cells to express desired proteins, including proteins that are capable of re-writing genetic and epigenetic cellular programs. However, the plasma membrane surrounding cells normally protects cells from exogenous nucleic acids, preventing efficient uptake and protein translation. Delivery systems can be used to enhance the uptake of nucleic acids by cells.  Conventional delivery systems, such as lipid nanoparticle (“LNP”)-based delivery, often suffer from endosomal entrapment and toxicity, which can limit their therapeutic use.  Our mRNA delivery technology is designed to use a novel chemical substance that is designed to deliver nucleic acids, including mRNA, to cells both ex vivo and in vivo. Our nucleic-acid delivery technology is also designed for ex vivo delivery of mRNA encoding gene-editing proteins and reprogramming factors, including to primary cells, insertion of exogenous sequences into genomic safe-harbor loci, and in vivo delivery of mRNA to the brain, eye, skin, and lung, which may be useful for the development of mRNA-based therapeutic.
mRNA Gene Editing
Our mRNA gene-editing technology is designed to delete, insert, and repair DNA sequences in living cells, which may be useful for correcting disease-causing mutations, making cells resistant to infection and degenerative disease, modulating the expression of immunoregulatory proteins to enable the generation of durable allogeneic peripheral blood mononuclearcell therapies, and engineering immune cells known as PBMCs, that have been stimulated using a proprietary process employing a specific population of cells and a specific mitogen.to more effectively fight cancer.

While IRX-2Conventional gene-editing technologies typically employ plasmids or viruses to express gene-editing proteins, which can result in low-efficiency editing and unwanted mutagenesis when an exogenous nucleic acid fragment is inserted at random locations in the genome. Our mRNA gene-editing technology instead is designed to employ mRNA to express gene-editing proteins, which can potentially enable gene editing without unwanted insertional mutagenesis, because, unlike conventional gene-editing technologies that employ viruses or DNA-based vectors, mRNA does not typically cause unwanted insertional mutagenesis. We believe the efficiency of our mRNA gene-editing technology has the potential to support development of product candidates that could create new therapeutic approaches. For example, we anticipate that our mRNA gene-editing technology can be used to generate allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (“CAR-T”) therapies for the treatment of cancer. In such allogeneic CAR-T therapies, mRNA encoding gene-editing proteins would be used to inactivate the endogenous T-cell receptor to prevent therapeutic T-cells from causing graft-versus-host disease (“GvHD”). GvHD occurs when transplanted cells view the patient’s (i.e. the host’s) cells as a cytokine mixture,threat and attack the host’s cells. We expect that this same mechanism of action can generate allogeneic stem cell-derived therapies in which mRNA encoding gene-editing proteins could be used to inactivate one of its activeor more components is IL2, a cytokine-signaling molecule with pleiotropic effects on the immune system. IL2 is a protein that regulates the activities of white blood cells (leukocytes, including lymphocytes) that are responsible for immunity. IL2 is part of the body’s natural responsehuman leukocyte antigen (“HLA”) complex to microbial infection,render the cells immuno-nonreactive or “stealth,” which may be useful for the development of allogeneic cell-based therapies.
mRNA Cell Reprogramming
Our mRNA cell-reprogramming technology is capable of generating clonal lines of pluripotent stem cells that can be expanded and differentiated into many desired cell types that may be useful for the development of regenerative cell therapies.
Conventional cell-reprogramming technologies (e.g., using Sendai virus or episomal vectors) can result in discriminating between foreign,low efficiency reprogramming, can select for cells with abnormal growth characteristics, and can leave traces of the vector in reprogrammed cells.Our mRNA cell-reprogramming technology instead is designed to employ mRNA to express reprogramming factors, which can enable cell reprogramming without leaving traces of the vector in reprogrammed cells, because, unlike conventional cell-reprogramming technologies that employ viruses or non-self and “self,” IL2 mediatesDNA-based vectors, mRNA does not typically leave traces of the vector in reprogrammed cells.
Former Product Candidate -- IRX-2
We currently do not have plans to further develop IRX-2, our former clinical product candidate. Results of the 150-patient Phase 2b INSPIRE trial, released in June 2022, showed outcomes favored IRX-2 in certain predefined subgroups but did not meet its effects by binding to IL2 receptors, which are expressed by lymphocytes.primary endpoint of event-free survival at two years of follow up. There were no new safety signals observed with IRX-2. The major sourcesINSPIRE trial was our only sponsored study of IL2 are activated CD4+ T lymphocytes and activated CD8+ T lymphocytes.

Unlike existing recombinant IL2 therapies,IRX-2.  IRX-2 is derived from human blood cells. We believe this may promote better tolerance, broader targeting and a natural molecular conformation leading to greater activity, and may permit low physiologic dosing, rather than the high doses neededhas been studied externally in other existing IL2 therapies.

Regarding IRX-2 development, our strategy is:


Advance our product candidate IRX-2 through clinical development. IRX-2 is a human blood cell-derived cytokine therapy being studied for multiple typesclinical settings outside of cancer, including squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. Enrollment in the ongoing Phase 2b INSPIRE trial, or the INSPIRE trial, has been completed, with top-line data estimated to be available by the third quarter of 2022.


Advance additional studies. Once INSPIRE trial data are released, we plan to use those results as a catalyst in addition to data from the other clinical trials in the program, see “—Clinical Program” below, with multiple data read-outs anticipated in 2022 and later.


Pursue partnerships to advance the IRX-2 clinical program. We are pursuing partnership opportunities with certain leading biopharmaceutical companies for the development and commercialization of IRX-2.


Regulatory strategy. We believe that our assets may present opportunities for potential breakthroughs in the treatment of cancer and other indications. We will endeavor to seek breakthrough therapy designation with regulatory agencies for IRX-2 for one or more indications.


Intellectual Property. We continue to pursue additional intellectual property based on data from our IRX-2 clinical studies.

Pre-Clinical Results

Our findings to date from our nonclinical studies of IRX-2 include murine acute toxicology as well as acute and chronic toxicology in non-human primates. These studies detected circulating associated cytokines yet were associated with benign toxicological findings.

Clinical Program

IRX2 currently remains under development and has not yet been approved for marketing authorization in any jurisdiction. The ongoing company sponsored development program is investigating use of IRX2 as an immunotherapeutic neoadjuvant (pre-surgical) and adjuvant (post-operative) treatment for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or (“HNSCC”).  Studies in other indications and combinations are being pursuedcancer in the form of investigator sponsored study program.

HNSCC

The HNSCC development program is being conducted under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”)  Investigational New Drug (IND) 11137 filed on June 30, 2003 and is ongoing. The HNSCC program has received fast track designation, approved November 7, 2003, and orphan drug designation, conferred on July 7, 2005, from the FDA.trials, all of which have either ended or are not currently active. We have not submitted a request for orphan drug designation in the European Union, although we may seek such designation in the future.

Clinical studies in humans with HNSCC involving IRX‑2 show immune marker activation in patients treated with IRX‑2. In a prior Phase 2a clinical trial, a correlation was shown between marker activation and disease-free survival in head and neck cancer. Results from this study were used to support the initiation of the INSPIRE trial involving 105 patients with HNSCC. Details of this trial can be found at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02609386). The trial study schema can be found below.

Historical Background of the Inspire Study

The IRX-2 regimen has been studied in patients HNSCC in two previous open-label, multi-center studies. Also, a phase 1 trial evaluated the IRX-2 regimen as a therapy for advanced disease, which reported that the IRX-2 regimen was well tolerated.

In 2011, results were reported for a Phase 2a trial of IRX-2. This trial was an open-label study involving 27 patients, 26 of whom completed the study. The primary endpoint of the study was to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of the immunotherapy regimen including IRX-2 in the neoadjuvant setting in previously untreated patients with advanced (Stage II to IVa) HNSCC. The primary study objective was to demonstrate the safety of this immunotherapy regimen based on adverse events (“AEs”), changes in clinical laboratory measures (hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis), vital signs, and physical examinations. Secondary objectives were clinical, pathologic, and radiographic tumor response; and patient disease-free survival (“DFS”) and overall survival (“OS”).

Most recombinant cytokines, such as IL-2, are tested in the same manner as traditional oncology drugs, where the maximum tolerated dose is sought. Typical cytokine therapies in cancer treatment use extremely high doses, in the millions of units per administration. Thus, AEs such as fever, hypotension, malaise, anemia, leukopenia, and hepatic and renal dysfunction are commonly reported, and often lead to discontinuation of the treatment. IV administration of cytokines is frequently associated with an acute phase reaction characterized by rigors, fever, an increase in neutrophils, a decrease in lymphocytes, and changes in hormone levels. By contrast, the IRX-2 regimen, which contains physiologic quantities of cytokines, showed greatly improved tolerability over typical recombinant cytokine therapies.

The results of the Phase 2a study were published in December 2011 in the journal Head and Neck. The article reported that IRX-2 showed an immunologically mediated antitumor effect, suggested by pronounced lymphocytic infiltration. Lymphocytic infiltration was measured by a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (“VAS”) score, in which 100 mm signified lymphocyte infiltration of the entire primary tumor section and 0 mm signified no lymphocyte infiltration in the tumor specimen. The mean VAS score for all 24 patients was 22.6 mm on the samples obtained at surgery. Patients were grouped into a low VAS score (below the overall mean) and high VAS score (above the overall mean) cohorts. There were 14 patients in the low VAS score cohort with scores between 2 and 21 (median of 9.5), and there were 10 patients in the high VAS score cohort with scores between 27 and 66 (median of 37.0). Patients in the high-LI group included fewer oral cavity patients (50% in high LI vs 60% in low LI) but were similar with respect to tumor sites. Seventy percent of high-LI patients were stage IV, whereas only 60% of low LI were stage IV. The LI score was used to determine whether the degree of LI correlated with survival. Patients with a high-LI score had an improved survival trend compared to those with low LI, and superior to the survival rate for the combined overall group. (See below.)


graphic

Interestingly, LI in resected tumor specimens was considered high in 40% of the patients. The 10 patients with a high-LI score showed an improved survival trend in comparison to the low-LI group (n = 15) and to the entire study population (n = 26). It is difficult to directly compare these subgroups, because there was some imbalance, with a slightly higher per-centage of oral cavity patients in the low-LI group. However, in the absence of a randomized control, it is impossible to directly attribute the LI to the immuno-therapy regimen. In addition, tumor reductions were observed at the end of the 21-day regimen in 11 patients, and a 75% reduction of glycolytic activity in the tumor and lymph nodes on posttreatment PET scans in one patient.

With regard to the primary endpoint, eight serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported during treatment and the 30-day postoperative period in 7 patients, including 3 patients with aspiration pneumonia, 1 patient with asthma exacerbation secondary to upper respiratory infection, 1 patient with a postoperative wound infection, 1 patient with a neck abscess, and 1 patient with an episode of alcohol withdrawal. Only 1 case of aspiration pneumonia was deemed life threatening (grade 4). None of the SAEs was considered related to treatment except for the postoperative wound infection, which was considered possibly related. Other minor (grade 1 or 2) AEs included headache (30%), injection-site pain (22%), nausea (22%), constipation (15%), dizziness (15%), fatigue (11%), and myalgia (7%).

After over more than 36 months of follow-up, 11 of the 27 patients enrolled in the Phase 2a study had experienced tumor relapse (n = 1) or death (n = 10). The pattern of first HNSCC relapse included 3 patients with primary site recurrence, 2 with recurrences in the neck, and 2 with distant metastases. Of the 10 patients who died, 6 died of cancer (1 from a new primary) and 4 died of other causes. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year DFS probabilities after surgery were 72%, 64%, and 62%, respectively. Of the 26 patients whose primary tumor was resected surgically, 2 patients died during the first year and 5 patients died during the second year after surgery. The probability of surviving after surgery was 92% the first year, 73% the second year, and 69% the third year, which was considered to be an encouraging survival rate compared to historical norms in patients with HNSCC.

A second finding of the study was that some tumors showed some decrease in overall size after the immunotherapy regimen. Overall tumor shrinkage was modest, although in 4 patients, independent, objective imaging documented a greater than 10% decrease in tumor size. This was unexpected and encouraging after only 3 weeks of presurgical neoadjuvant immunotherapy. No patient achieved a true partial response by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Increases in tumor measurements were also seen in some patients, but most patients showed negligible change in tumor dimensions. We believe that these findings suggest the safety of the neoadjuvant regimen, although final decisions on whether a drug product is safe and effective can only be made by the FDA.

The phase 2a trial did not include a randomized control cohort. However, the manuscript published in Head & Neck in December 2011 stated the authors’ belief that the safety results and feasibility of this immunotherapy regimen were intriguing enough to warrant further study and appropriate comparison in a randomized trial.

graphic

The INSPIRE study is an open label, randomized, multi-center, multi-national Phase 2b clinical trial intended for patients with Stage II, III or IVA untreated SCC of the oral cavity who are candidates for resection with curative intent. Subjects were randomized 2:1 to either Regimen 1 or Regimen 2 and treated for 21 days prior to surgery and then postoperatively with a booster regimen given every three months for one year (a total of four times.)

Regimen 1: IRX-2 Regimen with cyclophosphamide, indomethacin, zinc-containing multivitamins, omeprazole andprovided IRX-2 as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy.
Regimen 2: Regimen 1 with cyclophosphamide, indomethacin, zinc-containing multivitamins, omeprazole but without IRX-2 as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy.

Treatments were allocated to study subjects using minimization with a stochastic algorithm based on the range method. Minimization will account for the major prognostic factors for SCC of the oral cavity (T and N stage) and study center to avoid imbalances in treatment allocation within centers.

Postoperatively, subjects first received standard adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation therapy as determined by the investigators per NCCN guidelines, and then also received Booster Regimen 1 or 2 as determined in the prior randomization.

Subjects will be followed for the Primary, Secondary and Exploratory endpoints. Protocol mandated follow-up will end four years after randomization of the last patient.

The Neoadjuvant IRX-2 Regimen is a 21-day pre-operative regimen of cyclophosphamide on Day 1, indomethacin, zinc-containing multivitamins and omeprazole on Days 1-21, and subcutaneous IRX-2 injections in bilateral mastoid insertion regions for 10 days between Days 4 and 21, as shown in the table below:

Agent
Dose
Route of Administration
Treatment Days
Cyclophosphamide
300 mg/m2
IV
1
IRX-2
230 units daily (Bilateral injections of 115 units)
Subcutaneous at or near the mastoid insertion of both sternocleidomastoid muscles
Any 10 days between Days 4 and 21
Indomethacin
25 mg TID
Oral
1-21
Zinc-Containing Multivitamins
1 tablet containing 15-30 mg of zinc
Oral
1-21
Omeprazole
20 mg
Oral
1-21

The Booster IRX-2 Regimen is given at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months (-14 to +28 days) after surgical resection. It is a 10- day post-operative regimen of cyclophosphamide on Day 1, indomethacin, zinc-containing multivitamins and omeprazole on Days 1-10 and subcutaneous IRX-2 injections in bilateral deltoid regions for 5 days between Days 4 and 10 as shown in the table below:

Agent
Dose
Route of Administration
Treatment Days
Cyclophosphamide
300 mg/m2
IV
1
Every 3 months.
IRX-2
230 units daily (Bilateral injections of 115 units)
Subcutaneous into bilateral deltoid regions
Any 5 days between Days 4 and 10
Every 3 months.
Indomethacin
25 mg TID
Oral
Days 1-10
Every 3 months.
Zinc-Containing Multivitamins
1 tablet containing 15-30 mg of zinc
Oral
Days 1-10
Every 3 months.
Omeprazole
20 mg daily
Oral
Days 1-10

Regimen 2, the control arm of the study, is identical, except that subjects will not receive IRX-2.

The primary objective of the study is to determine if the event-free survival (EFS) of subjects treated with Regimen 1 is longer than for subjects treated with Regimen 2. The secondary objections of the study are (i) to determine if OS of subjects treated with Regimen 1 is longer than for subjects treated with Regimen 2, (ii) to compare the safety of each Regimen, and (iii) to compare the feasibility of each booster regimen.

Other Indications

Other than the phase 2b INSPIRE trial, all clinical studies using IRX-2 are investigator-sponsored studies for which we are providing IRX‑2 as the study drug and financial support to conduct the trial. These studies include:those investigator sponsored trials, but are no longer providing either.

Monotherapy studies:License Agreement


BR-101 - A study involving 16 patients with neoadjuvant breast cancer performed at the Providence Portland Medical Center. Details of this trial can be found at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02950259).


CIN-201 - An open label single arm Phase 2 trial of the IRX‑2 regimen in women with cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia 3 or squamous vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia 3. Details of this trial can be found at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03267680).

6

Combination studies:


BAS-104 - A basket study originally intended to enroll 100 patients with metastatic bladder, renal, non-small cell lung cancer, or NSCLC, melanoma, and head and neck cancer being held at the Moffitt Cancer Center, using IRX‑2 in conjunction with Opdivo® (Nivolumab), an immunotherapy cancer treatment marketed by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. This trial was discontinued after 11 subjects were enrolled due to insurance reimbursement challenges. Details of this trial can be found on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03758781).


HCC-107 - A study involving 28 patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma, or HCC, being held at City of Hope Medical Center, HonorHealth Research Institute, and Texas Oncology at Baylor Charles A. Simmons Cancer Center using IRX‑2 in conjunction with Opdivo®, a cancer treatment marketed by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Details of this trial can be found at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03655002).


GI-106 - A study involving 20 patients with metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers (GI) being held at City of Hope Medical Center, HonorHealth Research Institute, and Texas Oncology at Baylor Charles A. Simmons Cancer Center using IRX‑2 in conjunction with Keytruda® (Pembrolizumab), an immunotherapy cancer treatment marketed by Merck. Details of this trial can be found at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03918499).


MHN-102 - A study involving 15 patients with metastatic head and neck cancer being held at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute and University of Michigan Health System using IRX‑2 in conjunction with Imfinzi (Durvalumab), a cancer treatment marketed by AstraZeneca plc. Details of this trial can be found at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03381183).


BR-202 - A study involving 30 patients with neoadjuvant triple negative breast cancer, held at the Providence Portland Medical Center using IRX‑2 in conjunction with a programmed cell death protein 1, or PD1, and chemotherapy treatments. Details of this trial can be found at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04373031).

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic

The development of our product candidates has been, and could continue to be, disrupted and materially adversely affected by past and continuing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is largely a result of measures imposed by the governments and hospitals in affected regions, businesses and schools were suspended due to quarantines intended to contain this outbreak. The spread of COVID-19 from China to other countries resulted in the Director General of the World Health Organization declaring COVID-19 a pandemic in March 2020. While the constraints of the pandemic are being lifted, we are still assessing the longer-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our development plans, and on the ability to conduct our clinical trials. COVID-19 could continue to disrupt production and cause delays in the supply and delivery of products used in our operations, may affect our operations, including the conduct of clinical studies, or the ability of regulatory bodies to grant approvals or supervise our candidates and products, may further divert the attention and efforts of the medical community to coping with the COVID-19 and disrupt the marketplace in which we operate and may have a material adverse effects on our operations. COVID-19 may also affect our employees and employees and operations at suppliers that may result in delays or disruptions in supply. In addition, a recession or market correction resulting from the spread of COVID-19 could materially affect our business and the value of our common stock. Additionally, if the COVID-19 pandemic has a significant impact on our business and financial results for an extended period of time, our liquidity and cash resources could be negatively impacted. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing global efforts to contain its spread will impact our operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain, and include the duration, severity and scope of the pandemic and the actions taken to contain or treat the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, the specific clinical outcomes, or future pandemic related impacts of emerging COVID-19 variants cannot be reliably predicted.

The patients in our clinical trials have conditions that make them especially vulnerable to COVID-19, and as a result we have seen slowdowns in enrollment in our clinical trials. While our INSPIRE trial in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity is fully populated, our other clinical studies are likely to continue to encounter delays in enrollment as a result of the pandemic.

Engineered Cellular and Genetic Medicines

We are advancing our gene-editing and cell therapy technology in oncology, blood disorders and monogenic disorders through a license with Factor and through the Acquisition of Novellus, Inc. and Novellus, Ltd. in July 2021. We expect that the first generation product candidates resulting from the Acquisition will be derived from unedited (that is, not gene modified), induced pluripotent stem cells (“iPSC”)-derived allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (“iMSC”). We expect to begin preclinical development of iMSC for clinical indications for which inhibiting inflammation and/or supporting recovery of bone marrow stromal cells is required. The prior work of Novellus and NoveCite with iMSC shows evidence for preclinical efficacy in inflammatory conditions (for example, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or ARDS). Interactions with the FDA provided guidance on Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (“CMC”), and manufacturing plans, which will be undertaken in a similar manner for additional iMSC applications. We expect that second generation iMSC products will involve gene editing, for which we anticipate using the stepwise addition of genes provided by the in-licensed Factor Bioscience gene editing machinery, NoveSlice, to efficiently place genes and regulatory sequences into safe harbor locations. Development of processes to advance CMC and manufacturing will follow the experience from first generation iMSC products. We expect clinical indications for gene-modified iMSC will include solid tumors and other conditions associated with episodic and/or chronic inflammation.  We are also exploring opportunities to advance in vivo gene therapies for monogenic and other diseases by combining the NoveSlice gene editing technology in combination with ToRNAdoTM, the in-licensed lipid nanoparticle (or “LNP”) technology.

Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived MSC

MSC, also known as mesenchymal stromal cells, were originally discovered and isolated from bone marrow in the 1970s and have been isolated from various tissue sources including muscle, umbilical cord, liver, placenta, skin, amniotic fluid, synovial membrane, and tooth root. MSC have been intensely investigated for clinical applications within the last decades with a very strong record of safety and tolerability. However, the majority of registered clinical trials applying MSC therapy for diverse human diseases have fallen short of expectations, despite the encouraging pre-clinical outcomes in varied animal disease models. This can be attributable to inconsistent properties of MSC across studies as a result of variations in tissue source, donor variability, as well as isolation and manufacturing methodologies.

The generation of MSC from an iPSC source eliminates many of the sources of variability attributable to tissue derived MSC. Sources of reduced variability include the use a single tissue source and single donor as well as the ability to make larger cell banks due to the more extensive proliferation capacity of iMSC. Moreover, development of iMSC products can leverage decades of valuable manufacturing, preclinical and clinical experience with MSC. Brooklyn plans to create “off-the-shelf” iMSC products in clinical indications that harness their anti-inflammatory and tumor homing properties.  Further, gene editing of iPSC can produce a stable source for iMSC that are endowed with additional therapeutically beneficial properties that are not present in tissue derived MSC or native iMSC.

Bone Marrow Transplant and Inflammatory Diseases

Brooklyn is exploring the use of iMSC to address primary graft failure or poor graft function after bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, or BM/HSCT in addition to potential applications in the prevention and/or treatment of graft vs host disease.  Preclinical studies will be conducted to demonstrate the ability of iMSC to target the bone marrow and influence the microenvironment. In addition, we have assembled an advisory board of world class experts in BM/HSCT to guide the clinical trial design and selection of clinical populations that are most likely to show benefit of a secondary transplant after treatment with iMSC.

Tumor Localized Delivery of Immune Stimulating Cytokines

The ability of MSC to migrate and navigate to sites of inflammation, including tumors, makes MSC attractive for delivery of oncology therapeutics. We intend to use gene editing of iPSC to produce a cell line with expression of the immune stimulatory cytokines, which then can be used to generate iMSC that express both IL-7 and IL-15.  Following systemic delivery of the gene edited iMSC, we believe that migration and homing to tumor sites will result in a localized and more sustained delivery of these potent cytokines in the tumor microenvironment without producing the side effects that occur with high dose systemic administration of these cytokines.

Precision In vivo Genetic Medicines

We believe that  the ability to engineer target site-specific DNA endonucleases with high fidelity (gene editing) has opened a new therapeutic arena for addressing the underlying genetic basis of disease. Gene editing systems that possess both high specificity (low off-target editing) and high efficiency for on-target editing enable the in vivo use of the gene editing machinery to specifically modify patient DNA in target tissues and thus address the genetic underpinnings of numerous disease states. Brooklyn’s in-licensed technologies are being leveraged to develop genetic medicines that can achieve precision in vivo gene editing to address disorders that occur primarily as a result of mutations in a single gene.  The initial disease and gene targets being pursued include familial transthyretin amyloidosis (TTR gene mutations) and Stargardt disease (ABC4A gene mutation).

Autologous and Allogeneic Cell Therapy

Cellular reprogramming refers to the process of generating pluripotent stem cells from non-pluripotent somatic cells (e.g., dermal fibroblasts obtained through a skin biopsy) by the forced expression of key genes and factors important for maintaining the defining properties of pluripotent cells.  We believe the in-licensed technology for mRNA-based cellular reprogramming is highly efficient and safer than methods that utilize viral vectors or plasmid DNA for expression of reprogramming factors because it eliminates the chance of DNA integration and potential for creating mutations in genomic DNA. Also, our proprietary reprogramming process utilizes daily repeated transfection of mRNA for expression of reprogramming factors and can achieve a rapid generation of iPSC clones (in 2 weeks) from patient tissue biopsy. This rapid and efficient process therefore reduces the potential negative impact of low quantity biopsy material and enhances reproducibility of autologous iPSC generation. Furthermore, by delivering mRNA for a gene editing nuclease, genomic modifications, including correction of mutations, can be simultaneously performed thus streamlining overall manufacturing time to produce gene-corrected autologous cells. We expect that this approach, leveraging the proprietary in licensed technologies, can be employed to produce cell therapies addressing genetic diseases (e.g., sickle cell disease) of infectious diseases (e.g. HIV). In addition, we have the potential to generate off-the-shelf (allogeneic) iPSC derived cell therapies for truly personalized cell therapy application in patients with genetic diseases.

Recent Developments

Listing on The Nasdaq Global Market

We transferred the listing of our common stock to The Nasdaq Global Market effective October 25, 2021, after voluntarily withdrawing the listing from the NYSE American stock exchange. The common stock continues to trade under the stock symbol “BTX.”

PIPE Transaction

On March 6, 2022,November 14, 2023, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an investor (the “PIPE Investor”) providing for the private placement (the “PIPE Transaction”) to the PIPE Investor of approximately 6,857,000 units (the “Units”), each of  which consisted of (i) one share of our common stock (or, in lieu thereof, one pre-funded warrant (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”) to purchase one share of common stock)amended and (ii) one warrant (the “Common Warrants”) to purchase one share of common stock, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $12.0 million. The PIPE Transaction closed on March 9, 2022.

Each Pre-Funded Warrant has an exercise price of $0.005 per share of common stock, was immediately exercisable and may be exercised at any time and has no expiration date and is subject to customary adjustments. The Pre-Funded Warrants may not be exercised if the aggregate number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the holder thereof would exceed 9.99% immediately after exercise thereof.

Each Common Warrant has an exercise price of $1.91 per share, becomes exercisable six months following the closing of the PIPE Transaction, expires five-and-one-half years from the date of issuance, and is subject to customary adjustments. The Common Warrants may not be exercised if the aggregate number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the holder thereof would exceed 4.99% immediately after exercise thereof, subject to increase to 9.99% at the option of the holder.

In connection with the PIPE Transaction, we and the PIPE Investor also entered into a registration rights agreement, dated March 6, 2022, pursuant to which we agreed to prepare and file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to register the resale of the shares of common stock included in the Units and the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Pre-Funded Warrants and the Common Warrants. We agreed to use our best efforts to have such registration statement declared effective as promptly as possible after the filing thereof, subject to certain specified penalties if timely effectiveness is not achieved.

Purchase Agreements

On April 26, 2021, we and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC, or Lincoln Park, executed a purchase agreement, or the First Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the First Purchase Agreement, we had the right, but not the obligation, to sell to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park would be obligated to purchase, up to $20.0 million of shares of our common stock. Sales of common stock by us were subject to certain limitations, and could occur from time to time, at our sole discretion. In consideration for Lincoln Park’s entry into the First Purchase Agreement, we issued Lincoln Park approximately 56,000 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2021, we had issued and sold to Lincoln Park approximately 1,128,000 shares of common stock under the First Purchase Agreement for gross proceeds of $20.0 million, and no further shares may be sold to Lincoln Park under the First Purchase Agreement.

On May 26, 2021, we and Lincoln Park executed a second purchase agreement, or the Second Purchase Agreement, and together with the First Purchase Agreement, the Purchase Agreements. Pursuant to the Second Purchase Agreement,we have the right, but not the obligation, to sell to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park would be obligated to purchase, up to $40.0 million of shares of our common stock. Sales of common stock by us are subject to certain limitations, and may occur from time to time, at our sole discretion. In consideration of Lincoln Park’s entry into the Second Purchase Agreement, we issued to Lincoln Park 50,000 shares of common stock.

Under the Second Purchase Agreement, we may direct Lincoln Park to purchase up to 60,000 shares of common stock on any business day, which we refer to as a Regular Purchase, which amount may be increased up to 120,000 shares based on the closing price of the common stock, provided that Lincoln Park’s maximum commitment in any single Regular Purchase may not exceed $2.0 million. The purchase price per share for each such Regular Purchase is based off of the common stock’s market immediately preceding the time of sale.

The Second Purchase Agreement also prohibits us from directing Lincoln Park to purchase any shares of common stock if those shares, when aggregated with all other shares of common stock then beneficially owned by Lincoln Park and its affiliates, would result in Lincoln Park and its affiliates having beneficial ownership, at any single point in time, of more than 4.99% of the then total outstanding shares of common stock. We have the right to terminate the Second Purchase Agreement at any time, at no cost or penalty.

Actual sales of shares of common stock to Lincoln Park under the Second Purchase Agreements depend on a variety of factors to be determined by us from time to time, including, among others, market conditions, the trading price of the common stock and determinations by us as to the appropriate sources of funding for us and our operations.

As of December 31, 2021, we had issued and sold approximately 2,424,000 shares of common stock under the Second Purchase Agreement for total gross proceeds of $34.1 million.  Pursuant to the securities purchase agreement in respect of the PIPE Transaction, we are prohibited from issuing additional shares under the Second Purchase Agreement for a period of one -year immediately following the closing of the PIPE Transaction.

Acquisition of Novellus

On July 16, 2021, Brooklyn and its newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary Brooklyn Acquisition Sub, Inc. entered into an agreement and plan of acquisition, or the Acquisition Agreement, with (a) Novellus LLC, (b) Novellus, Inc., the sole equity holder of Novellus, Ltd. and, prior to the closing under the Acquisition Agreement, a wholly owned subsidiary of Novellus, LLC, and (c) a seller representative. Novellus, Ltd. is a pre-clinical stage biotechnology company organized under the laws of Ireland that is developing engineered cellular medicines using its licensed, patented non-immunogenic mRNA, high-specificity gene editing, mutation-free and footprint-free cell reprogramming and serum-insensitive mRNA lipid delivery technologies. The Acquisition closed contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of the Acquisition Agreement.

We delivered consideration for the Acquisition totaling approximately $124.0 million, which consisted of (a) $22.8 million in cash and (b) approximately 7,022,000 shares of common stock, which under the terms of the Acquisition Agreement were valued at a total of $102.0 million, based on a price of $14.5253 per share.

We expect the Acquisition will advance our evolution into a platform company with a pipeline of next generation engineered cellular, gene editing and cytokine programs. The completion of the Acquisition relieves Brooklyn LLC from potential obligations to pay Novellus, Ltd. certain upfront fees, clinical development milestone fees and post-registration royalties under the License Agreement. The agreement with Factor under the License Agreement, which grants Brooklyn LLC exclusive rights to develop certain next-generation mRNA gene editing and cell therapy products, remains unchanged.

License and Royalty Agreements

Cell and Gene Therapy

On April 26, 2021, Brooklyn LLC entered into anrestated exclusive license agreement or the(the “A&R Factor License Agreement, with Novellus, Ltd. and Factor, or the Licensors, to license the Licensors’ intellectual property and mRNA cell reprogramming and gene editing technology for use in the development of certain cell-based therapies to be evaluated and developed for treating human diseases, including certain types of cancer, sickle cell disease, and beta thalassemia. Through the License Agreement, Brooklyn LLC acquired an exclusive worldwide license to develop and commercialize certain cell-based therapies to treat cancer and rare blood disorders, including sickle cell disease, based on patented technology and know-how of Novellus, Ltd.

The License Agreement provides that Brooklyn LLC pay the Licensors a total of $4.0 million in connection with the execution of the License Agreement, all of which has been paid. Brooklyn LLC was obligated to pay to the Licensors additional fees of $5.0 million in October 2021 and $7.0 million in October 2022.

The completion of our July 16, 2021 acquisition of Novellus, Inc., the sole equity holder of Novellus, Ltd., relieves us from potential obligations to pay Novellus, Ltd. certain upfront fees, clinical development milestone fees and post-registration royalties under the License Agreement. The agreementsAgreement”) with Factor underLimited to replace in its entirety the License Agreement remain unchanged. Brooklyn LLC is obligated to payexclusive license agreement we entered into with Factor $2.5 million in October 2021, which has been paid, and $3.5 million in October 2022.

dated February 20, 2023, as amended on July 12, 2023.  Under the terms of the A&R Factor License Agreement, Brooklyn LLCFactor Limited granted to us an exclusive, sublicensable license under certain patents owned by Factor Limited (the “Factor Patents”).  The A&R Factor License Agreement also provides for, among other things, the expansion of our license rights to include (i) the field of use of the Factor Patents to include veterinary uses, (ii) know-how that is requirednecessary or reasonably useful to practice to the licensed patents, (iii) the ability to sublicense through multiple tiers (as opposed to only permitting a direct sublicense), and (iv) the transfer of technology to us, subject to the use commercially reasonably efforts to achieve certain delineated milestones, including specified clinical developmentrestrictions in the Amended and regulatory milestones and specified commercialization milestones. In general, upon its achievementRestated License Agreement.  The term of these milestones, Brooklyn LLCthe A&R Factor License Agreement expires on November 22, 2027, but will be obligated, inautomatically extended for an additional five years if we pay at least $6.0 million to Factor Limited from fees from sublicenses to the caseFactor Patents (“Sublicense Fees”), other cash on hand or a combination of development and regulatory milestones,both sources of funds.  We will pay to make milestone payments to Licensor in specified amounts and, inFactor Limited 20% of any Sublicense Fee received by us during the caseterm of commercialization milestones, to specified royalties with respect to product sales, sublicense fees or salesthe A&R Factor License Agreement.  In September 2023, we will also begin paying Factor Limited a monthly maintenance fee of pediatric review vouchers. In the event Brooklyn LLC fails to timely achieve certain delineated milestones, the Licensorsapproximately $0.4 million.  We may have the right to terminate the rights of Brooklyn LLC under provisions of theA&R Factor License Agreement relatingupon 120 days’ written notice to those milestones.

The LicensorsFactor Limited, and both parties have additional customary termination rights.  Under the A&R Factor License Agreement, we are responsible forobligated to pay the expenses incurred by Factor Limited in preparing, filing, prosecuting and maintaining the Factor Patents and we agreed to bear all patent applicationscosts and patentsexpenses associated with enforcing and defending the Factor Patents in any action or proceeding arising from pursuit of sublicensing opportunities under the License Agreement. If, however, the Licensors determine not to maintain a particular licensed patent or not to prepare, file and prosecute a licensed patent, Brooklyn LLC will have the right, but not the obligation, to assume those responsibilities in the territory at its expense.

Novellus, Ltd. is a pre-clinical development, manufacturing, and technology licensing entity focused on engineered cellular medicines. Novellus, Ltd. has developed mRNA-based cell reprogramming and gene editing technologies to create engineered cellular medicines. The synthetic mRNA is non-immunogenic—it is capable of successfully evading the cellular innate immune system and then is capable of expressing high levels of proteins for cell reprogramming and gene editing. The mRNA may be formulated for injection into target tissues for cellular uptake and therapeutic treatment.

The synthetic mRNA technology may be used to edit gene mutations or expressed gene-editing proteins to treat genetic and rare diseases. It may also be used to reprogram human non-pluripotent cells into induced pluripotent stem cells )(iPSC). The iPSC may then be differentiated into populations of varying therapeutic cell types. The reprogramming technology offers a rapid and patient specific therapy using the engineered stem cells created from iPSC that may avoid the cost, complexity and safety issues associated with viral vector gene editing approaches.

Novellus, Ltd. also has licenses from Factor to use over 70license granted patents throughout the world covering synthetic mRNA, RNA-based gene editing, and RNA-based cell reprogramming, in addition to specific patents covering methods for treating specific diseases. There are also more than 60 pending patent applications throughout the world focused on these and other aspects of the technology. The patent coverage includes granted patents and pending patent applications in the United States, Europe, and Japan, along with other major life sciences markets.

Novellus, Ltd. is required to use commercially reasonably efforts to achieve certain delineated milestones, including specified clinical development and regulatory milestones and specified commercialization milestones. In general, upon its achievement of these milestones, Novellus, Ltd. will be obligated, in the case of development and regulatory milestones, to make milestone payments of up to $51 million in aggregate to Factor and, in the case of commercialization milestones, specified royalties with respect to product sales, sublicense fees or sales of pediatric review vouchers. In the event Novellus, Ltd. fails to timely achieve certain delineated milestones, Factor may have the right to terminate Novellus, Ltd.’s rights under provisions of the License Agreement relating to those milestones.

There can be no assurance that Brooklyn LLC can successfully develop and commercialize the technology licensed under the A&R Factor License Agreement.

IRX-2

Unless otherwise stated below, each royalty to be paid under these license and royalty agreements is payable until the last patent for IRX-2 expires and runs in perpetuity unless earlier terminated pursuant to the terms described below. There are no milestone payments due under any of these agreements.

License Agreement with the University of South Florida Research Association

On June 28, 2000, IRX Therapeutics, a predecessor of Brooklyn LLC, entered into a series of License Agreements (collectively, the “USF License Agreement”) with the University of South Florida Research Association, Inc. (“Research Association”). Pursuant to the USF License Agreement, as amended, the Research Association licensed to IRX Therapeutics the exclusive worldwide rights to certain patents on IRX-2 in exchange for royalties equal to 7% of the gross product sales of IRX-2 (as defined in the USF License Agreement). The USF License Agreement was assigned to Brooklyn LLC in connection with the sale of the assets of IRX Therapeutics to Brooklyn in November 2018. The Research Association has the right to terminate the USF License Agreement (i) upon Brooklyn LLC’s entering into bankruptcy or insolvency on a voluntary or involuntary basis, (ii) upon the failure to pay royalties due and payable upon thirty days’ notice, or (iii) upon a material breach or default of the Agreement by Brooklyn LLC, unless such breach or default is cured within a thirty-day notice period. Brooklyn may terminate the USF License Agreement for any reason upon six months’ notice to the Research Association.

Royalty Agreement with certain former IRX Therapeutics investors

On May 1, 2012, IRX Therapeutics entered into a royalty agreement (the “IRX Investor Royalty Agreement”) with certain investors who participated in a financing transaction. The IRX Investor Royalty Agreement was assigned to Brooklyn LLC in November 2018 when Brooklyn LLC acquired the assets of IRX Therapeutics. Pursuant to the IRX Investor Royalty Agreement, if and when Brooklyn LLC becomes obligated to pay royalties to the Research Association under the USF License Agreement, it will pay an additional royalty of 1% of gross sales to an entity organized by the investors who participated in such financing transaction. There are no termination provisions in the IRX Investor Royalty Agreement.

Collaborator License Agreement

Effective June 28, 2018, IRX Therapeutics terminated its Research, Development and Option Facilitation Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”) and its Options Agreement with a collaborative partner (the “Collaborator”), pursuant to a Termination Agreement. In connection with the Termination Agreement, all of the rights granted to the Collaborator under the RDO and Option Agreements were terminated, and IRX Therapeutics had no obligation to refund any payments received from the Collaborator. The Termination Agreement was assigned to Brooklyn LLC in connection with the sale of the assets of IRX Therapeutics to Brooklyn in November 2018.

As consideration for entering into the Termination Agreement, the Collaborator will receive a royalty equal to 6% of revenues from the sale of IRX-2, for the period of time beginning with the first sale of IRX-2 through the later of (i) the twelfth anniversary of the first sale of IRX-2, or (ii) the expiration of the last IRX patent or other exclusivity of IRX-2, all as more particularly set forth in the Termination Agreement. Each party under the Termination Agreement may terminate the agreement (i) upon a material breach of the Termination Agreement by the other party that is not cured within sixty days (or thirty days if such breach is due to Brooklyn LLC’s non-payment of royalties), or (ii) upon the other party entering into bankruptcy on a voluntary or involuntary basis where such petition is not dismissed, discharged, bonded or stayed within ninety days.

Investor Royalty Agreement

On November 6, 2018, Brooklyn LLC entered into a royalty agreement (the “Brooklyn Investor Royalty Agreement”) with Brooklyn Immunotherapeutics Investors LP (“Investors LP”) and Brooklyn Immunotherapeutics Investors GP (“Investors GP”), which entities provided the financing required by Brooklyn LLC in connection with Brooklyn LLC’s acquisition of the assets of IRX Therapeutics. Under the Brooklyn Investor Royalty Agreement, Brooklyn LLC is required to pay compensatory royalties equal to 4% of gross sales of IRX-2 on an annual basis, 3% of which is to be paid to Investors LP and 1% of which is to be paid to Investors GP (all as more particularly set forth in the Royalty Agreement). This royalty continues in perpetuity.

In anticipation of the Merger, on March 22, 2021, Brooklyn LLC entered into an Amended and Restated Royalty Agreement and Distribution Agreement, or the Amended Royalty Agreement, with Investors GP, Investors LP, and certain beneficial holders of GP and LP. Pursuant to the Amended Royalty Agreement, among other things, we are required to pay compensatory royalties equal to 4% of net revenues of IRX-2, on an annual basis, of which 3% is to be paid to certain beneficial holders of LP and 1% is to be paid to certain beneficial holders of GP. The royalty continues in perpetuity.

The Royalty Agreement specifies royalty payments to certain beneficial holders, including:

Charles Cherington, one of our directors and stockholders has a right to receive 4.20% of the Specified Royalty;
entities affiliated with George P. Denny III (Denny Family Partners II, LLC, the George P. Denny Trust, and the R. Breck Denny Trust), a former director and current stockholder have a right to receive a total of 4.39% of the Specified Royalty;
an entity affiliated with Nicholas J. Singer (PCI BI LLC), a former director and current stockholder, has a right to receive a total of 2.10% of the Specified Royalty

entities affiliated with Yiannis Monovoukas (The Yiannis Monovoukas Family 2013 Revocable Trust FBO Alexi Monovoukas, The Yiannis Monovoukas Family 2013 Revocable Trust FBO Aresti Monovoukas, and The Yiannis Monovoukas Family 2013 Revocable Trust FBO Christian Monovoukas), a former director and stockholder have a right to receive a total of 1.40% of the Specified Royalty; and;
an entity affiliated with John D. Halpern (The John D. Halpern Revocable Trust), one of our stockholders, has a right to receive 3.50% of the Specified Royalty.
 
Patent Portfolio

Our strategy is to develop and advance a pipeline of therapeutic products both internally and through strategic partnerships, leveraging our in-licensed mRNA technology platform, with the near-term focus on deploying our mRNA technology platform through strategic partnerships. As of April 12, 2022,February 06, 2024, we owned or controlled approximately 9had in-licensed 16 patent families filed in the United States and other major markets worldwide, including 99138 granted 10 pending and 11 publishedpatents, 5 allowed patent applications, directed to novel compounds, formulations, methods of treatments11 nationalized PCT applications, 100 pending non-provisional patent applications or provisional patent applications, and platform technologies.1 pre-nationalization PCT application. Patent protection for IRX-2the mRNA technology platform includes:

Summary Description of Patent or Patent Application
Family Number and Title

United States or Foreign
Jurisdiction

Earliest Effective Date
of Patent Application





IRX-2 Modified Manufacturing Process
FAB-001: “Methods and Products for Transfecting Cells”

Granted: Granted: US (No. 8,470,562)(Nos. 9,422,577, 9,605,277, 9,605,278, 10,472,611, 10,662,410, 10,829,738, 10,982,229, ,11,466,293, 11,692,203 and 11,708,586), EP (CH, DE, FR, GB, IE), EP (BE, CH, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, GB, IT, LI, NL, SW)IE, NL), AU (6X), CA, CN (4X), HK (5X), JP (2X), KR (2X), MX(2X), RU
Nationalized PCT: (1X)
Pending: US (4X), AU, BR (4X), CA, CN, EP, HK (2X), KR, MX (3X), RU
12/05/2011
FAB-003: “Methods and Products for Transfection”
Granted: US (Nos. 8,497,124, 9,127,248, 9,399,761, 9,562,218, 9,695,401, 9,879,228, 9,969,983, 10,131,882, 10,301,599, 10,443,045, 11,492,600)
Pending: US
5/07/2012
FAB-005: “Methods and Products for Expressing Proteins in Cells”
Granted: US (Nos. 9,447,395, 9,376,669, 9,464,285, 9,487,768, 9,657,282, 9,758,797, 10,415,060, 10,590,437, 11,339,409, 10,752,917, 11,339,410 ,10,724,053, 11,332,758, 10,767,195, 11,332,759, 10,752,918 and 10,752,919
), EP (CH, DE, FR, GB, IE), AU (2X), BR (3X), CA, HK, JP (3X), KR (3X), MX, RU
Nationalized PCT: (1X)
Allowed: BR, JP, MX and US
Pending: AU, CA, CN, EU, HK, KR and US
11/01/2012

FAB-008: “Methods and Products for Nucleic Acid Production and Delivery”
Granted: US (Nos. 9,770,489 and 10,124,042), EP (DE, FR, GB, CH, ES, IE), EP (BE; DK; FI; FR; DE; IE; NL; NO; ES; SE; CH; GB), AU, HK, JP, KR, MX, RU
Nationalized PCT: (1X)
Pending: AU, BR, CA, CN, EP, JP, KR, MX and US (2X)
08/18/2014
FAB-009: “Nucleic Acid Products and Methods of Administration Thereof”
Granted: US (No. 11,241,505), AU, JP
Nationalized PCT: (1X)
Pending: AU, CA, CN, EP, HK (2X), JP, NZ and US
02/16/2016
FAB-010: “Nucleic Acid Products and Methods of Administration Thereof”
Granted: US (Nos. 10,576,167, 10,137,206, 10,350,304, 10,363,321, 10,369,233, 10,888,627, and 10,894,092), AU, CN
Nationalized PCT: (1X)
Issue Fees Paid: US
Pending: US (3X), AU, CN, EP, HK, IL (2X), JP (2X), NZ (2X)
08/17/2017
FAB-011: “Nucleic Acid-Based Therapeutics”
Nationalized PCT: (1X)
Pending: US, AU, CA, EP and HK
03/27/2019
FAB-012: “Cationic Lipids and Transfection Methods”
Granted: US (Nos. 10,501,404, 10,556,855, 10,611,722, 10,752,576, 11,242,311 and 11,814,333)
Nationalized PCT: (1X)
Pending: US (2X), AU, CA, CN, EP, HK, JP, KR, MX, TRNZ

US: 4/14/200907/30/2019
 
EP: 4/14/2009Foreign: 07/03/2019

FAB-013: “Engineered Gene-Editing Proteins”
Pending: US, EP
Nationalized PCT: (1X)
05/12/2021
FAB-016: “Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapies”
Nationalized PCT: (1X)
Pending: US, AU, CN, EP, HK and JP
04/28/2021
    
FAB-017: “Engineered Immune Cell Therapies”
 
Method of Reversing Immune Suppression of Langerhans Cells
Nationalized PCT: (1X)
GrantedPending:: US, (Nos. 9,333,238 and 9,931,378), EP (BE, CH, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, GB, LI, NL), AU, CA,
Published: CN, HKEP and JP

US: 6/8/2012 (No. 9,333,238), 4/13/2016 (No. 9,931,378)
EP: 12/8/2010
03/04/2022
    
FAB-018: “Circular RNA”
 
Method of Increasing Immunological Effect
Nationalized PCT: (1X)
GrantedPending:: US, (Nos. 7,993,660 and 8,591,956), EP (BE, CH, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, GB, IT, LI, NL), AU, CA, CN, EP and JP
Published: HK

US: 8/9/2011 (No. 7,993,660), 11/26/2013 (No. 8,591,956)
EP: 11/26/2008
04/27/2022
    
FAB-019: “Methods for reprogramming and gene editing cells”
 
Vaccine ImmunotherapyPre-nationalization PCT: (1X)
Granted: US (Nos. 6,162,778, 9,492,517, 9,492,519, 9,539,320 and 9,566,331), EP (BE, CH, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, GB, IT, LI, NL), AU, CA, HK, JP

US: 7/24/2007 (No. 6,162,778), 10/8/2009 (No. 9,492,517), 11/15/2011 (No. 9,539,230), 2/20/2013 (No. 9,566,331), 7/12/2013 (No. 9,492,519)
EP: 5/17/2010
01/05/2022
    
Immunotherapy for Reversing Immune Suppression
Granted: US (No. 7,731,945), AU
US: 10/26/2002
Vaccine Immunotherapy for Immune Suppressed Patients
Granted: US (Patent Nos.  6,977,072, 7,153,499, 8,784,796, 9,789,172 and 9,789,173), CA, JP

US: 10/26/2001 (No. 6,977,072), 5/5/2003 (No. 7,153,499), 7/12/2013 (No. 8,784,796), 6/4/2014 (Nos. 9,789,172 and 9,789,173)
Immunotherapy for Immune Suppressed Patients
Granted: EP (BE, CH, DE, ES, FR, GB, IT, NL, LI)

EP:  3/9/2007
Composition for the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Granted: CA
Published: EP, HK


Uses of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors and/or CTLA-4 Inhibitors with a Biologic Containing Multiple Cytokine Components
Pending: AU, CA, EP, IL, JP, KR, NZ, PH, SG, US
Published: BR, CN, EA, IN, MX, ZA








US – United States of America
EP – European Patent Convention
PCT – Patent Cooperation Treaty
AU – Australia
BE – Belgium
BR – Brazil
CA – Canada
CH – Switzerland
CN – Peoples’ Republic of China
DE – Germany
DK – Denmark
ES – Spain
FI – Finland
FR – France
GB – Great Britain
IT – Italy
LI – Lichtenstein
NL – Netherlands
SW – Sweden
AU – Australia
BR - Brazil
CA – Canada
CN – Peoples’ Republic of China
EA – Eurasian Patent Organization
HK – Hong Kong
IE – Ireland
IL – Israel
IN - India
JP – Japan
KR – Republic of Korea (South Korea)
MX – Mexico
PHNLPhilippinesNetherlands
SG - SingaporeNO – Norway
TRNZTurkeyNew Zealand
ZARUSouth AfricaRussian Federation
SE – Sweden





Patent Families

Descriptions of our patent families with issued patents in the United States or European Union are as follows:

IRX-2 Modified Manufacturing Process
FAB-001: “Methods and Products for Transfecting Cells” - A method of making a primary cell derived biologic, including the steps of: (a) removing contaminatingThe present invention relates in part to nucleic acids encoding proteins, nucleic acids containing non-canonical nucleotides, therapeutics comprising nucleic acids, methods, kits, and devices for inducing cells to express proteins, methods, kits, and devices for transfecting, gene editing, and reprogramming cells, and cells, organisms, and therapeutics produced using these methods, kits, and devices. Methods for inducing cells to express proteins and for reprogramming and gene-editing cells using RNA are disclosed. Methods for producing cells from mononuclearpatient samples, cells (“MNCs”) by loading leukocytes onto lymphocyte separation medium (“LSM”),produced using these methods, and washingtherapeutics comprising cells produced using these methods are also disclosed.
FAB-003: “Methods and centrifugingProducts for Transfection” - The present invention relates in part to methods for producing tissue-specific cells from patient samples, and to tissue-specific cells produced using these methods. Methods for reprogramming cells using RNA are disclosed. Therapeutics comprising cells produced using these methods are also disclosed.
FAB-005: “Methods and Products for Expressing Proteins in Cells” - The present invention relates in part to nucleic acids encoding proteins, therapeutics comprising nucleic acids encoding proteins, methods for inducing cells to express proteins using nucleic acids, methods, kits and devices for transfecting, gene editing, and reprogramming cells, and cells, organisms, and therapeutics produced using these methods, kits, and devices. Methods and products for altering the medium with an automated cell processing and washing system; (b) storing the MNCs overnight in a closed sterile bag system; (c) stimulating the MNCs with a mitogen and ciprofloxacin in a disposable cell culture system to produce cytokines; (d) removing the mitogen from the mononuclear cells by filtering; (e) incubating the filtered MNCs in a culture medium; (f) producing a clarified supernatant by filtering the MNCs from the culture medium; (g) producing a chromatographed supernatant by removing DNA from the clarified supernatant by anion exchange chromatography; and (h) removing viruses from the chromatographed supernatant by filtering with dual 15 nanometer filters in series, thereby producing a primary cell derived biologic, wherein the primary cell derived biologic comprises IL-1.beta., IL-2, and IFN-.gamma.

Method of Reversing Immune Suppression of Langerhans Cells - A method of treating human papillomavirus (“HPV”), by administering a therapeutically effective amountsequence of a primary cell-derived biologiccell are described, as are methods and products for inducing cells to a patient infected with HPVexpress proteins using synthetic RNA molecules. Therapeutics comprising nucleic acids encoding gene-editing proteins are also described.
FAB-008: “Methods and Products for Nucleic Acid Production and Delivery” - The present invention relates in part to nucleic acids, including nucleic acids encoding proteins, therapeutics and cosmetics comprising nucleic acids, methods for delivering nucleic acids to cells, tissues, organs, and patients, methods for inducing an immune responsecells to HPV. A method of overcoming HPV-induced immune suppression of Langerhansexpress proteins using nucleic acids, methods, kits and devices for transfecting, gene editing, and reprogramming cells, (“LC”), by administering a therapeutically effective amountand cells, organisms, therapeutics, and cosmetics produced using these methods, kits, and devices. Methods and products for altering the DNA sequence of a primary cell-derived biologiccell are described, as are methods and products for inducing cells to a patient infected with HPVexpress proteins using synthetic RNA molecules, including cells present in vivo. Therapeutics comprising nucleic acids encoding gene-editing proteins are also described.
FAB-009: “Nucleic Acid Products and activating LC. A methodMethods of increasing LC migration towards lymph nodes, by administering a therapeutically effective amountAdministration Thereof” - The present invention relates in part to nucleic acids, including nucleic acids encoding proteins, therapeutics and cosmetics comprising nucleic acids, methods for delivering nucleic acids to cells, tissues, organs, and patients, methods for inducing cells to express proteins using nucleic acids, methods, kits and devices for transfecting, gene editing, and reprogramming cells, and cells, organisms, therapeutics, and cosmetics produced using these methods, kits, and devices.
FAB-010: “Nucleic Acid Products and Methods of a primary cell-derived biologicAdministration Thereof” - The present invention relates in part to a patient infected with HPV, activating LC,nucleic acids, including nucleic acids encoding proteins, therapeutics and cosmetics comprising nucleic acids, methods for delivering nucleic acids to cells, tissues, organs, and patients, methods for inducing LC migration towards lymph nodes. A method of generating immunity against HPV, by administering an effective amount of a primary cell derived biologiccells to a patient infected with HPV, generating immunity against HPV,express proteins using nucleic acids, methods, kits and preventing new lesions from developing.devices for transfecting, gene editing, and reprogramming cells, and cells, organisms, therapeutics, and cosmetics produced using these methods, kits, and devices.

15FAB-011: “Nucleic Acid-Based Therapeutics” - The present invention relates in part to nucleic acids, including nucleic acids encoding proteins, therapeutics and cosmetics comprising nucleic acids, methods for delivering nucleic acids to cells, tissues, organs, and patients, methods for inducing cells to express proteins using nucleic acids, methods, kits and devices for transfecting, gene editing, and reprogramming cells, and cells, organisms, therapeutics, and cosmetics produced using these methods, kits, and devices.
FAB-012: “Cationic Lipids and Transfection Methods” - The present invention relates in part to novel cationic lipids and their use, e.g., in delivering nucleic acids to cells.
FAB-013: “Engineered Gene-Editing Proteins” - The present invention relates in part to nucleic acids encoding gene editing proteins, including novel engineered variants.
Method
FAB-016: “Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapies” - Cell-based therapies based on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are described.
FAB-017: “Engineered Immune Cell Therapies” - The present disclosure relates in part to engineered immune cells that are, inter alia, silenced from a host immune response.
FAB-018: “Circular RNA” - Nucleic acid structures that promote formation of Increasing Immunological Effect - A methodcircular RNAs (circRNAs), which may comprise hybridization of increasing immunological effectsubstantially complimentary regions within the nucleic acid and contact with an RNA ligase. The nucleic acid structures may be used in a patient by administering an effective amount of a primary cell derived biologic togene editing and/or therapeutic applications. In some embodiments, the patient, inducing immune production, blocking immune destruction,nucleic acid comprises the structure: 5'-X-Y-A-IRES-B-CDS-C-Y'-Z-3', wherein X, Y, Y' and increasing immunological effect in the patient. Methods of treating an immune target, treating a tumor, immune prophylaxis, and preventing tumor escape.

Vaccine Immunotherapy/Composition for the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer – A method providing compositions and methods of immunotherapy to treat cancer or other antigen-producing diseases or lesions. According to one embodiment of the invention, a composition is provided for eliciting an immune response to at least one antigen in a patient having an antigen-producing disease or lesion, the composition comprising an effective amount of a cytokine mixture, preferably comprising IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IFN-gamma. (gamma) and TNF- alpha (alpha). The cytokine mixture acts as an adjuvant with the antigen associated with the antigen-producing disease or lesion to enhance the immune response of the patient to the antigen. Methods are therefore also provided for eliciting an immune response to at least one antigen in a patient having an antigen-producing disease or lesion utilizing the cytokine mixture of the invention. The compositions and methods are useful in the treatment of antigen-producing diseases such as cancer, infectious diseases or persistent lesions.

Immunotherapy for Reversing Immune Suppression - A method for overcoming immune suppression including the steps of inducing production of naïve T-cells and restoring T cell immunity.  A method of vaccine immunotherapy includes the steps of inducing production of naïve T cells and exposing the naïve T cells to endogenous or exogenous antigens at an appropriate site.  Additionally, a method for unblocking immunization at a regional lymph node includes the steps of promoting differentiation and maturation of immature dendritic cells, thus, for example, exposing tumor peptides to T cells to gain immunization of the T cells.  Further, a method of treating cancer and other persistent lesions includes the steps of administering an effective amount of a natural cytokine mixtures an adjuvant to endogenous or exogenous administered antigen to the cancer or other persistent lesions; preferably the natural cytokine mixture is administered with thymosin.

Vaccine Immunotherapy for Immune Suppressed Patients - A method for overcoming mild to moderate immune suppression includes the steps of inducing production of naive T-cells and restoring T-cell immunity. A method of vaccine immunotherapy includes the steps of inducing production of naive T-cells and exposing the naive T-cells to endogenous or exogenous antigens at an appropriate site. Additionally, a method for unblocking immunization at a regional lymph node includes the steps of promoting differentiation and maturation of immature dendritic cells at a regional lymph node and allowing presentation of processed peptides by resulting mature dendritic cells, thus, for example, exposing tumor peptides to T-cells to gain immunization of the T-cells. Further, a method of treating cancer and other persistent lesions includes the steps of administering an effective amount of a natural cytokine mixture as an adjuvant to endogenous or exogenous administered antigen to the cancer or other persistent lesions.

Immunotherapy for Immune Suppressed Patients – A method providing compositions of a natural cytokine mixture (“NCM”) for treating a cellular immunodeficiency characterized by T lymphocytopenia,Z each independently comprise one or more dendritic cell functional defects such as those associated with lymph node sinus histiocytosis, and/ornucleotides; Y and Y' are substantially complementary; X and Z are not substantially complementary; IRES comprises an internal ribosome entry site; CDS comprises a coding sequence; and A, B, and C are each independently a spacer comprising one or more monocyte functional defects such as those associated withnucleotides or null.
FAB-019: “Methods for reprogramming and gene editing cells” The present disclosure provides improved methods for reprogramming and gene editing cells, including manufacturing a negative skin test to NCM. The invention includes methodspopulation of treating these cellular immunodeficiences using the NCMcells comprising cells of the invention. The compositions and methods are useful inlymphoid lineage and/or cells of the treatment of diseases associated with cellular immunodeficiencies such as cancer. Also provided are compositions and methods for reversing tumor-induced immune suppression comprising a chemical inhibitor and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (“NSAID”). The invention also provides a diagnostic skin test comprising NCM for predicting treatment outcome in cancer patients.myeloid lineage.

Patent Term and Term Extensions

Individual patents have terms for varying periods depending on the date of filing of the patent application or the date of patent issuance and the legal term of patents in the countries in which they are obtained. Generally, utility patents issued for applications filed in the United States and the European Union are granted a term of 20 years from the earliest effective filing date of a non-provisional patent application. In addition, in certain instances, a patent term can be extended to recapture a portion of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or the USPTO, delay in issuing the patent as well as a portion of the term effectively lost as a result of the FDAUnited States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) regulatory review period. However, as to the FDA component, the restoration period cannot be longer than five years and the restoration period cannot extend the patent term beyond 14 years from FDA approval. The duration of foreign patents varies in accordance with provisions of applicable local law, but typically are also 20 years from the earliest effective filing date. All taxes or annuities for a patent, as required by the USPTO and various foreign jurisdictions, must be timely paid in order for the patent to remain in force during this period of time.

The actual protection afforded by a patent may vary on a product-by-product basis, from country to country, and can depend upon many factors, including the type of patent, the scope of its coverage, the availability of regulatory-related extensions, the availability of legal remedies in a particular country and the validity and enforceability of the patent.

Our patents and patent applications may be subject to procedural or legal challenges by others. We may be unable to obtain, maintain and protect the intellectual property rights necessary to conduct our business, and we may be subject to claims that we infringe or otherwise violate the intellectual property rights of others, which could materially harm our business. For more information, see the section titledItem 1A “Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property.”Property” contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Supply and Manufacturing

Brooklyn has
We currently do not have any agreements for the supply or manufacturing of cell lines. However, together with our licensor, Factor Limited, we believe that we have considerable experience in manufacturingdeveloping engineered cell lines. Pursuant to a Master Services Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2022 (the “MSA”), by and between us and Factor Bioscience Inc. (“Factor Bioscience”), the investigational active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) currentlyparent company of Factor Limited, Factor Bioscience has agreed to provide us with certain mRNA cell engineering research support services, including (i) access to Factor Bioscience’s research laboratory facilities located in Cambridge, Massachusetts, (ii) access to Factor Bioscience’s scientific equipment, (iii) training of our research staff in certain mRNA, iPSC, and gene editing technologies, (iv) copies of protocols, formulations, and sequences that may be useful for the clinic. In recent years,development of mRNA cell engineering products and (v) in vitro transcription templates, mRNA constructs, and iPS cells that may be useful for the development of mRNA cell engineering products. To the extent that we maintained internal API manufacturing capabilities. We are currently investigating the optionneed to obtain a supply of outsourcing API manufacturingcell lines or manufacture them, we expect to an experiencedcontract with a contract manufacturing organization (“CMO”), as we had historically done,or to mitigateenter into a new work order under the overhead costs of internal manufacturing and leverage process development expertise to streamline and eliminate some of the more manual processes, thereby reducing risk of product microbial contamination.  The CMO selected will have the capability to produce high quality product to meet both the investigational and anticipated commercial demands. There will be technology transfer and process validation costs, which will be carefully considered in any decision.  We have established long-standing contract manufacturing relationships for fill/finish and packaging of the clinical supplies of IRX-2.  As with any supply program, obtaining raw materials of the correct quality, and the performance of our contract manufacturing sites cannot be guaranteed.  Due to the current demand for CMO services and supply chain issues in the COVID-19 pandemic environment we cannot ensure that we will be successful in obtaining such raw materials on terms acceptable to us, if at all.MSA.

We expect to similarly rely on contract manufacturing relationships for any products that we may in-license or acquire in the future. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully contract with such manufacturers on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Contract manufacturers are subject to ongoing periodic and unannounced inspections by the FDA, the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) and corresponding state agencies to ensure strict compliance with current good manufacturing practices (“cGMPs”) and other state and federal regulations. Our contractors, if any, in Europe face similar challenges from the numerous European Union and member state regulatory agencies and authorized bodies. We do not have control over third-party manufacturers’ compliance with these regulations and standards, other than through contractual obligations. If our contractors are deemed out of compliance with cGMPs, product recalls could result, inventory could be destroyed, production could be stopped, and supplies could be delayed or otherwise disrupted, which could have a materially adverse effect on our business.

If we need to change manufacturers after commercialization, the FDA and corresponding foreign regulatory agencies must approve these new manufacturers in advance, which will involve testing and additional inspections and associated regulatory submissions to ensure compliance with FDA regulations and standards, which collectively may result in significant lead times, delay and cost. Furthermore, switching manufacturers may be difficult because the number of potential manufacturers is limited. It may be difficult or impossible for us to find a replacement manufacturer quickly or on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Regulatory Matters

Government regulationAs discussed above, our near-term focus is on entering into strategic partnerships to deploy our mRNA technology platform, and we expect that potential strategic partners will use our mRNA technology platform for preclinical and eventual clinical development of product approvalcandidates for a variety of clinical indications. To the extent we enter into agreements with strategic partners, the fees, payments or other compensation we may be eligible to receive may be based on or related to the clinical, regulatory or commercial development of their product candidates, which development we expect will be largely out of our control.

GovernmentIn addition, as discussed in this section, government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local level, and in other countries extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, labeling, record-keeping, promotion, storage, advertising, distribution, marketing and export and import of product candidates and products such as thosethat potential strategic partners may seek to develop. Accordingly, although we are developing. do not currently plan to directly develop any product candidates, the regulatory framework related to products and the development of product candidates may continue to impact our operations and financial condition.
Government regulation and product approval
Drugs and biologics must be approved by the FDA through the New Drug Application (NDA)(“NDA”) process or the Biologic License Application (BLA)(“BLA”) process before they may be legally marketed in the United States. Henceforth, we willWe use the termterms “marketing application” or MA“MA” to apply to both.

There are two centers within the FDA that are responsible for the review and approval of drug and biologic marketing applications and general regulatory oversight: the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research or CDER,(“CDER”) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research or CBER.(“CBER”). While all conventional drug products are regulated by CDER, biologic products can be regulated by either CDER or CBER, depending on the product’s classification.

The majority of BLA submissions are assigned to CBER; however, BLAs for certain biologic product categories are reviewed by CDER. These product categories include monoclonal antibodies for in vivo use, most proteins for therapeutic use, and categories such as cytokines, enzymes, and other novel proteins. Based on this, it is likely that a BLA submission for IRX-2 would fall under the jurisdiction of CDER. Regardless of the category, NDAs for all drug products fall under the jurisdiction of CDER.

In the United States, drugs are subject to rigorous regulation by the FDA under the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or FDCA,(“FDCA”) and implementing regulations, and biologics under the FDCA, the Public Health Services Act (PHSA)(“PHSA”), and their implementing regulations. Additionally, drugs and biologics are subject to other federal and state statutes. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with appropriate federal, state, local, and foreign statutes and regulations require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Failure to comply with the applicable United States requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process, or after approval, may subject an applicant to administrative or judicial sanctions. These sanctions could include the FDA’s refusal to approve pending applications, license suspension or revocation, withdrawal of an approval, a clinical hold, warning letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, civil penalties or criminal prosecution. Any agency or judicial enforcement action could have a material adverse effect on us. The process required by the FDA before a drug or biologicsbiologic may be marketed in the United States generally involves the following:

 
completion of pre-clinicalpreclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies according to the FDA’s good laboratory practice, or GLP, regulations;
 
submission of an investigational new drug application or IND,(“IND”), which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin and which must include approval by an institutional review board or IRB,(“IRB”) at each clinical site before the trials are initiated;
 
performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed drug for its intended use conducted in compliance with federal regulations and good clinical practice or GCP,(“GCP”), an international standard meant to protect the rights and health of human clinical trial subjects and to define the roles of clinical trial sponsors, administrators, and monitors;
 
submission to, and acceptance by, the FDA of a MA;
 
satisfactory completion of an FDA inspection of our manufacturing facility or other facilities at which the drug or biologic is produced to assess compliance with current good manufacturing practice or cGMP,(“cGMP”), regulations to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the drug’s identity, strength, quality and purity;
 
potential FDA audit of the non-clinical and clinical trial sites that generated the data in support of the MA: and
 
FDA review and approval of the MA.

The testing and approval process require substantial time, effort and financial resources, and the receipt and timing of any approval is uncertain.

United States drug development process

Once a pharmaceutical candidate is identified for development it enters the pre-clinicalpreclinical testing stage. Pre-clinicalPreclinical tests include laboratory evaluations of product chemistry, toxicity and formulation, as well as animal studies. Prior to beginning human clinical trials, a sponsor must submit an Investigational New Drug Application (“IND”)IND to the FDA, which includes the results of the pre-clinicalpreclinical tests, together with manufacturing information and analytical data. Some pre-clinicalpreclinical or non-clinical testing may continue even after the IND is submitted. In addition to including the results of the pre-clinicalpreclinical studies, the IND will also include a protocol detailing, among other things, the objectives of the clinical trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated, if the trial lends itself to an efficacy evaluation. The IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA, within the 30-day time period, raises concerns or questions about the conduct of the trial. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. The FDA may, at any time, impose a clinical hold on ongoing clinical trials. If the FDA imposes a clinical hold, clinical trials cannot commence or recommence without FDA authorization and then only under terms authorized by the FDA.

Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational new drug to healthy volunteers or patients under the supervision of one or more qualified investigators in accordance with federal regulations and GCP.

Clinical trials must be conducted under protocols detailing the objectives of the trial and the safety and effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. Each protocol must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. Further, an Institutional Review Board, or IRB affiliated with each institution participating in the clinical trial must review and approve each protocol before any clinical trial commences at that institution. All research subjects must provide informed consent, and informed consent information must be submitted to the IRB for approval prior to initiation of the trial.trial and prior to providing it to potential subjects. Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted at least annually to the FDA and more frequently if adverse events or other certain types of other changes occur.

Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three phases. A fourth, or post-approval, phase may include additional clinical studies. These phases generally include the following, and may be sequential, or may overlap or be combined:

 
Phase 1 clinical trials involve the initial introduction of the drug or biologic into human subjects. These studies are designed to determine the safety of usually single doses of the compound and determine any dose limiting intolerance, as well as evidence of the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of the drug in humans. For some products for severe or life-threatening diseases, especially if the product may be too toxic to administer to healthy humans, the initial clinical trials may be conducted in individuals having a specific disease for which use the tested product is indicated.
 
Phase 2 clinical trials usually involve studies in a limited patient population to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the drug or biologic for specific, targeted indications, to determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage, and to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks.
 
In Phase 3, if a compound is found to be potentially effective and to have an acceptable safety profile in Phase 2 (or occasionally Phase 1) studies, the Phase 3 studies will be conducted to further confirm clinical efficacy, optimal dosage and safety within an expanded population which may involve geographically diverse clinical trial sites. Generally, but not always, two adequate and well-controlled Phase 3 clinical trials are required by the FDA for approval of a marketing application.
 
Phase 4 clinical trials are studies required of or agreed to by a sponsor that are conducted after the FDA has approved a product for marketing. These studies are used to gain additional experience from the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic indication and to document a clinical benefit in the case of drugs approved under accelerated approval regulations. If the FDA approves a product while a company has ongoing clinical trials that were not necessary for approval, a company may be able to use the data from these clinical trials to meet all or part of any Phase 4 clinical trial requirement. Failure to promptly conduct Phase 4 clinical trials where necessary could result in withdrawal of approval for products approved under accelerated approval regulations.

While Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 studies are generally required for approval of a marketing application, certain drugs and biologics may not require one or more steps in the process depending on other testing and the situation involved. Additionally, the FDA, an IRB, or the sponsor may stop testing at any time if results show patients being exposed to unnecessary health risks or overly dangerous side effects.  Prior to the initiation of a clinical trial or at any time during the conduct of studies with human subjects, the FDA may place a study on clinical hold where patients may not be enrolled and ongoing trial activities are suspended until questions around potential safety issues with investigational products are addressed.

In addition, the manufacturer of an investigational drug in a Phase 2 or Phase 3 clinical trial for a serious or life-threatening disease is required to make available, such as by posting on its website, its policy on evaluating and responding to requests for expanded access to such investigational drug.

Concurrent with clinical trials, companies usually complete additional animal studies and must also develop additional information about the mechanism of action and physical characteristics of the drug and finalize a process for manufacturing the product in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product and, among other requirements, the manufacturer must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality, potency, and purity of the final product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and validated, and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the product does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.

Additional Regulation for Gene Therapy Clinical Trials
In addition to the regulations discussed elsewhere in this section, there are a number of additional standards that apply to clinical trials involving the use of gene therapy. The FDA has issued various guidance documents regarding gene therapies, which outline additional factors the FDA will consider at each of the above stages of development and relate to, among other things: the proper preclinical assessment of gene therapies; the CMC information that should be included in an IND application; the proper design of tests to measure product potency in support of an IND or BLA application; and measures to observe delayed adverse effects in subjects who have been exposed to investigational gene therapies when the risk of such effects is high. Further, the FDA usually recommends that sponsors observe subjects for potential gene therapy-related delayed adverse events for a 15-year period, including a minimum of five years of annual examinations followed by 10 years of annual queries, either in person or by questionnaire. The NIH and the FDA have a publicly accessible database, the Genetic Modification Clinical Research Information System, which includes information on gene therapy trials and serves as an electronic tool to facilitate the reporting and analysis of adverse events on these trials.
United States drug review and approval process

Following completion of clinical studies, the results are evaluated and, depending on the outcome, submitted to the FDA in the form of an NDA or BLA in order to obtain FDA approval of the product and authorization to commence commercial marketing. In responding to an NDA or BLA, the FDA may require additional testing or information, may require that the product labeling be modified, may impose a post-approval study and other commitments or reporting requirements or other restrictions on product distribution, or may deny the application.  The timing of final FDA review and action varies greatly but can take years in some cases and may involve the input of an FDA advisory committee of outside experts. Product sales in the United States may commence only whenupon FDA approval of an NDA or BLA is approved.BLA.

FDA approval of a marketing application is required before marketing of the product may begin in the United States. The MA must include the results of product development, pre-clinicalpreclinical studies and clinical studies, together with other detailed information, including information on the chemistry, manufacture and controls utilized in manufacture of the product. In addition, aan MA must also demonstrate purity, specifically in terms of showing that the final product does not contain extraneous material. The FDA has 60 days from its receipt of the MA to review the application to ensure that it is sufficiently complete for substantive review before accepting it for filing. The FDA may request additional information rather than accept an MA for filing. In this event, the MA must be resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmitted application also is subject to review before the FDA accepts it for filing. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review. The submission of an MA is also subject to the payment of a substantial application fee (for FDA fiscal year 2022 this fee may exceed 3 million dollars, although(although a waiver of such fee may be obtained under certain limited circumstances, including when the drug that is subject of the application has received Orphan Drug Designation for the indication sought). Further, the sponsor of an approved MA is subject to an annual program fee, which for FDA fiscal year 2022 is $369,413 per prescription drug product.fee. User fees typically increase annually. The approval process is lengthy and complex, and the FDA may refuse to approve an MA if the applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied or may require additional clinical or other data and information. Even if such data and information is submitted, the FDA may ultimately decide that the NDA or BLA does not satisfy the criteria for approval. The FDA may also refer applications for novel drug products or drug products which present difficult questions of safety or efficacy to an advisory committee, typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts, for review, evaluation and a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved. The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee. The FDA reviews an application to determine, among other things, whether a product is safe and effective for its intended use. Before approving an MA, the FDA will inspect the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured to determine whether its manufacturing is cGMP–compliant to assure and preserve the product’s identity, potency, quality, purity and stability.
If the FDA’s evaluation of the marketing submission or manufacturing facilities is not favorable, the FDA will issue a complete response letter. The complete response letter outlines the deficiencies in the submission and often requires additional testing or information in order for the FDA to reconsider the application. Even after submitting this additional information, the FDA ultimately may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval. With limited exceptions, the FDA may withhold approval of aan MA regardless of prior advice it may have provided or commitments it may have made to the sponsor.

Once an MA is approved, changes to the conditions of approval, including additional indications, are made by the submission of a supplement to the MA The supplemental NDA or sNDA,(“sNDA”) or the supplemental BLA or sBLA(“sBLA”) must contain all of the information necessary to support the change. In the case of a new indication, that information usually consists of at least one clinical trial, and often more. Like an MA, FDA determines whether the supplemental application is sufficiently complete to permit review before it is filed. FDA then reviews the supplemental application. The FDA can either approve or issue a complete response letter outlining the deficiencies.

Manufacturing Readinessreadiness

As part of the approval process, the FDA must inspect and approve each manufacturing facility. Among the conditions of approval is the requirement that a manufacturer’s quality control and manufacturing procedures conform to cGMP. Manufacturers must expend significant time, money and effort to ensure continued compliance, and the FDA conducts periodic inspections to verify compliance.  If we, or our contract manufacturers, faila manufacturer fails to comply or cannot remedy regulator identified deficiencies, then wethe FDA may be prohibitedprohibit the product from marketing product.being marketed.

If the FDA grants approval, the approval will be limited to those conditions and patient populations for which the product is safe and effective, as demonstrated through clinical studies. Further, a product may be marketed only in those dosage forms and for those indications approved in the MA. Certain changes to an approved MA, including, with certain exceptions, any significant changes to labeling, require approval of a supplemental application before the drug may be marketed as changed. Any products that we manufacturemanufactured or distributedistributed pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to continuing monitoring and regulation by the FDA, including compliance with cGMP and the reporting of adverse experiences with the drugs. The nature of marketing claims that the FDA will permit us to makepermits in the labeling and advertising of our products will generally be limited to those specified in FDA approved labeling, and the advertising of our products will be subject to comprehensive monitoring and regulation by the FDA. Products whose review was accelerated may carry additional restrictions on marketing activities, including the requirement that all promotional materials are pre-submitted to the FDA. Claims exceeding those contained in approved labeling will constitute a violation of the FDCA. Violations of the FDCA or regulatory requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process, or marketing and sale following approval may result in agency enforcement actions, including corrective advertising, cessation of violative promotion, withdrawal of approval, recall, seizure of products, warning letters, injunctions, fines and/or civil or criminal penalties. Any agency enforcement action could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Failure to comply with applicable federal, state and foreign laws and regulations would likely have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, federal, state and foreign laws and regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of new drugs are subject to future changes.

Post-approval requirements and consideration

Once aan MA is approved, a product will be subject to certain post-approval requirements. For instance, the FDA and Federal Trade Commission closely regulatesregulate the post-approval marketing and promotion of drugs and biologics, including standards and regulations for direct-to-consumer advertising, off-label promotion, industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities and promotional activities involving the internet. As a condition of MA approval, the FDA may also require a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy or REMS,(“REMS”) to help ensure that the benefits of the drug or biologic outweigh the potential risks. REMS can include medication guides, communication plans for the healthcare professionals, and other Elements to Assure Safe Use or ETASU.(“ETASU”). ETASU can include, but are not limited to, special training or certification for prescribing or dispensing, dispensing only under certain circumstances, special monitoring, and the use of patient registries. The requirement for a REMS can materially affect the potential market and profitability of the drug or biologic.
Drugs and biologics may be marketed only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved labeling. Changes to some of the conditions established in an approved application, including changes in indications, labeling, or manufacturing processes or facilities, require submission and FDA approval of a new MA supplement before the change can be implemented. An MA supplement for a new indication typically requires clinical data similar to that in the original application, and the FDA uses the same procedures and actions in reviewing MA supplements as it does in reviewing MAs.

Adverse event reporting and submission of periodic reports isare required following FDA approval of an MA. The FDA also may require post-marketing testing, known as Phase 4 testing, and surveillance to monitor the effects of an approved product or place conditions on an approval that could restrict the distribution or use of the product. In addition, quality control as well as drug manufacture, packaging, and labeling procedures must continue to conform to cGMPs after approval. Drug and biologic manufacturers and certain of their subcontractors are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA during which the agency inspects manufacturing facilities to assess compliance with cGMPs. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the areas of production and quality control to maintain compliance with cGMPs. Regulatory authorities may withdraw product approvals or request product recalls if a company fails to comply with regulatory standards, if it encounters problems following initial marketing, or if previously unrecognized problems are subsequently discovered.

Foreign regulatory requirements

In addition to regulation by the FDA and certain state regulatory agencies, wethere are also subject to a variety of foreign regulations governing clinical trials and the marketing of other products. Outside of the United States, ourthe ability of a company to market a product depends upon receiving a marketing authorization from the appropriate regulatory agencies. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, marketing authorization, pricing and reimbursement vary widely from country to country. In any country, however, wea company will only be permitted to commercialize ourits products if the appropriate regulatory agency is satisfied that we havethe company presented adequate evidence of safety, quality and efficacy. Whether or not FDA approval has been obtained, approval of a product by the comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries must be obtained prior to the commencement of marketing of the product in those countries. The regulatory approval and oversight process in other countries includes all of the risks associated with regulation by the FDA and certain state regulatory agencies as described above.

Under the European Union regulatory system, applications for drug approval may be submitted either in a centralized or decentralized manner. Under the centralized procedure, a single application to the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) may lead to an approval granted by the European Commission which permits marketing of the product throughout the European Union. The decentralized procedure provides for mutual recognition of nationally approved decisions and is used for products that do not comply with requirements for the centralized procedure. Under the decentralized procedure, the holders of national marketing authorization in one of the countries within the European Union may submit further applications to other countries within the European Union, who will be requested to recognize the original authorization based on an assessment report provided by the country in which marketing authorization is held.

Pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement

In both United States and foreign markets, ourthe ability of a company to commercialize ourits products successfully, and to attract commercialization partners for ourits products, depends in significant part on the availability of adequate financial coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors, including, in the United States, governmental payors such as Medicare and Medicaid, managed care organizations, private commercial health insurers and pharmacy benefit managers or PBMs.(“PBMs”). Third party payors are increasingly challenging the prices charged for medicines and examining their cost effectiveness, in addition to their safety and efficacy. WeCompanies may need to conduct expensive pharmacoeconomic or other studies in order to further demonstrate the value of ourits products. Even with the availability of such studies, our products may be considered less safe, less effective or less cost-effective than alternative products, and third-party payors may not provide coverage and reimbursement for ourany product, candidates, in whole or in part.
Political, economic and regulatory influences are subjecting the health care industry in the United States to fundamental changes. There have been, and we expect there will continue to be, legislative and regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system in ways that could significantly affect our business,the development and commercialization of products, including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the “Affordable Care Act”).

We anticipate that inIn the United States, Congress, state legislatures, and private sector entities willare expected to continue to consider and may adopt healthcare policies intended to curb rising healthcare costs. These cost containment measures could include:

 
controls on government-funded reimbursement for drugs;
 
mandatory rebates or additional charges to manufacturers for their products to be covered on Medicare Part D formularies;
 
controls on healthcare providers;
 
controls on pricing of pharmaceutical products, including the possible reference of the pricing of United States drugs to non-United States drug pricing for the same product;
 
challenges to the pricing of drugs or limits or prohibitions on reimbursement for specific products through other means;
 
reform of drug importation laws;
 
entering into contractual agreements with payors; and
 
expansion of use of managed-care systems in which healthcare providers contract to provide comprehensive healthcare for a fixed cost per person

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”) contained several provisions designed to curb the prices of drugs and biologics to Medicare beneficiaries. For instance, the IRA will require the federal government to directly negotiate the prices of certain drugs and biologics beginning in 2026.  Additionally, beginning in 2023, the IRA requires manufacturers of drugs and biologics to offer rebates if the price of the drug or biologic raises faster than inflation.
We are unable to predict what additional legislation, regulations or policies, if any, relating to the healthcare industry or third-party coverage and reimbursement may be enacted in the future or what effect such legislation, regulations or policies would have on our business. Any cost containment measures, including those listed above, or other healthcare system reforms that are adopted may have a material adverse effect on our business prospects.

Further, the pricing of pharmaceutical products generally, and particularly the pricing of orphan drugs, has recently received scrutiny from the press and from members of Congress in both parties. Some members of the medical community have also made statements in the press on the pricing of orphan drugs. The impact of this scrutiny on the pricing of orphan drugs and other pharmaceutical products generally cannot be determined with any certainty at this time.Competition

The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, which was included in the Affordable Care Act, authorized the FDA to approve similar versions of innovative biologics, commonly known as biosimilars. Under the Affordable Care Act, a manufacturer may submit an application for licensure of a biologic product that is “biosimilar to” or “interchangeable with” a previously approved biologic product or “reference product.” Manufacturers may not submit an application for a biosimilar to the FDA until four years following approval of the reference product, and the FDA may not approve a biosimilar product until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was approved. Even if IRX-2 or any other biologic product we may acquire or in-license, if approved, are deemed to be reference products eligible for exclusivity, another company could market a competing version of that product if the FDA approves a full BLA for such product containing the sponsor’s own preclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to demonstrate the safety, purity and potency of its product.

Orphan Drug Exclusivity

Some jurisdictions, includingIn the United States and Europe, may designate drugs or biologic products for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 (ODA), the FDA may grant orphan drug designation to drugs or biologic products intended to treat a rare disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or more than 200,000 individuals in the United States and for which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making available in the United States a drug for this type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales in the United States for that drug. In the United States, orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting an application for marketing approval. An orphan drug designation does not shorten the duration of the regulatory review and approval process. The grant of an orphan drug designation request does not alter the standard regulatory requirements and process for obtaining marketing approval. Safety and efficacy of a product candidate must be established through adequate and well-controlled studies. If a product which has been granted orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the indication for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to an orphan drug exclusivity period, which means the FDA may not approve any other application to market the same drug for the same disease or condition for a period of seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as where an alternative product demonstrates clinical superiority to the product with orphan exclusivity. In addition, holders of exclusivity for orphan drugs are expected to assure the availability of sufficient quantities of their orphan drugs to meet the needs of patients. Failure to do so could result in the withdrawal of marketing exclusivity for the drug.

The orphan drug exclusivity contained in the ODA has been the subject of recent scrutiny from the press, from some members of Congress and from some in the medical community. There can be no assurance that the exclusivity granted in ODA to orphan drugs approved by the FDA will not be modified in the future, and as to how any such change might affect our products.

The European Orphan Drug Regulation is considered for drugs intended to diagnose, prevent or treat a life-threatening or very serious condition afflicting five or fewer per 10,000 people in the EU, including compounds that for serious and chronic conditions would likely not be marketed without incentives due to low market return on the sponsor’s development investment. The medicinal product considered should be of significant benefit to those affected by the condition. Benefits of being granted Orphan Medicinal Product Designation are significant, including ten years of marketing exclusivity and a potential two-year extension. The EU Community and Member States may not accept or grant for ten years a new marketing authorization or application for another drug for the same therapeutic indication as the orphan drug, although the ten-year period can be reduced to six years if, after the end of the fifth year, available evidence establishes that the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of the marketing exclusivity. A supplementary protection certificate may extend the protection six months beyond patent expiration if that is later than the orphan drug exclusivity period. To apply for the supplementary protection, a pediatric investigation plan, or PIP, must be included in the market application. In Europe all drugs now seeking marketing authorization need to have a PIP agreed with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) before it can be approved, even if it is a drug being developed specifically for a pediatric indication. If a product is developed solely for use in the pediatric population, then a Pediatric Use Marketing Authorization, or PUMA, may provide eight years of data exclusivity and ten years of marketing exclusivity.

Fast Track Designation and Accelerated Approval

The FDA is required to facilitate the development, and expedite the review, of drugs or biologics that are intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening disease or condition for which there is no effective treatment and which demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs for the condition. Under the fast-track program, the sponsor of a new product candidate may request that FDA designate the product candidate for a specific indication as a fast-track drug concurrent with, or after, the filing of the IND for the product candidate. FDA must determine if the product qualifies for fast-track designation within 60 days of receipt of the sponsor’s request.

Under the fast track program and FDA’s accelerated approval regulations, FDA may approve a product for a serious or life-threatening illness that provides meaningful therapeutic benefit to patients over existing treatments based upon a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, or on a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than irreversible morbidity or mortality, that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity, rarity, or prevalence of the condition and the availability or lack of alternative treatments.

In clinical trials, a surrogate endpoint is a measurement of laboratory or clinical signs of a disease or condition that substitutes for a direct measurement of how a patient feels, functions, or survives. Surrogate endpoints can often be measured more easily or more rapidly than clinical endpoints. A product approved on this basis is subject to rigorous post-marketing compliance requirements, including the completion of Phase 4 or post-approval clinical trials to confirm the effect on the clinical endpoint. Failure to conduct required post-approval studies, or confirm a clinical benefit during post-marketing studies, will allow FDA to withdraw the product from the market on an expedited basis. All promotional materials for products approved under accelerated regulations are subject to prior review by FDA.

In addition to other benefits such as the ability to use surrogate endpoints and engage in more frequent interactions with FDA, FDA may initiate review of sections of a fast-track drug’s MA before the application is complete. This rolling review is available if the applicant provides, and FDA approves, a schedule for the submission of the remaining information and the applicant pays applicable user fees. However, FDA’s time period goal for reviewing an application does not begin until the last section of the MA is submitted. Additionally, the fast-track designation may be withdrawn by the FDA if they believe that the designation is no longer supported by data emerging in the clinical trial process.

Priority Review

Under FDA policies, a product candidate is eligible for priority review, or review within a six to eight-month time frame from the time a complete MA is submitted, if the product candidate is intended for the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of a serious or life-threatening condition, demonstrates the potential to address an unmet medical need, or provides a significant improvement compared to marketed drugs.

Disclosure of clinical trial information

Sponsors of clinical trials of FDA-regulated products, including drugs, are required to register and disclose certain clinical trial information. Information related to the product, patient population, phase of investigation, study sites and investigators, and other aspects of the clinical trial is then made public as part of the registration. Sponsors are also obligated to disclose the results of their clinical trials after completion. Disclosure of results of these trials can be delayed in certain circumstances for up to two years after the date of completion of the clinical trial. Competitors may use this publicly available information to gain knowledge regarding the progress of development programs. Finally, there can be no assurance that fast track designation will result in a faster review process.

Anti-Kickback, False Claims Laws, Stark Law & the Prescription Drug Marketing Act

In addition to FDA restrictions on marketing of pharmaceutical products, other state and federal laws have been applied to restrict certain marketing practices in the pharmaceutical industry in recent years. These laws include anti-kickback prohibition, statutes and false claims statutes. The federal healthcare program Anti-Kickback Statute, or Anti-Kickback Statute, prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration to induce or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for the purchase, lease or order of any healthcare item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federally financed healthcare programs. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on the one hand and patients, prescribers, purchasers and formulary managers on the other. Violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute are punishable by imprisonment, criminal fines, civil monetary penalties, and exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs. Although there are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting certain common activities from prosecution or other regulatory sanctions, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that involve remuneration intended to induce prescribing, purchases or recommendations may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exemption or safe harbor.

Federal false claims laws prohibit, among other things, any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false claim for payment to the federal government, or knowingly making, or causing to be made, a false statement to have a false claim paid. Recently, several pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies have been prosecuted under these laws for allegedly inflating drug prices they report to pricing services, which in turn were used by the government to set Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates, and for allegedly providing free product to customers with the expectation that the customers would bill federal programs for the product. In addition, certain marketing practices, including off-label promotion, may also violate false claims laws. The majority of states also have statutes or regulations similar to the Anti-Kickback Statute and false claims laws, which apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payer.

Federal law includes a provision commonly known as the “Stark Law.” This law prohibits a physician (defined to include a doctor of medicine or osteopathy, a doctor of dental surgery or dental medicine, a doctor of podiatric medicine, a doctor of optometry, or a chiropractor) from referring Medicare and Medicaid patients to certain types of entities with which the physician or any of the physician’s immediate family members have a financial relationship, unless an exception to the law’s prohibition is met. Subject to adherence to their respective criteria requirements, the self-referral prohibition contains a number of exceptions, including exceptions covering employment or independent contractor arrangements, space and equipment leases, and recruitment agreements.  Sanctions within the Stark Law include significant civil penalties including over $25,000 for each violation, over $169,000 for schemes to circumvent the Stark Law restrictions, and up to $10,000 for each day an entity fails to report required information and exclusion from the federal healthcare programs.  Violations of the Stark Law may also result in payment denials, false claim recoveries, civil monetary penalties, and/or federal program exclusion.  Further, several states have enacted statutes similar in scope and purpose to the Stark Law. These state laws may mirror the federal Stark Law or may be different in scope. The available guidance and enforcement activity associated with such state laws varies considerably.

The Physician Payments Sunshine Act, created under the ACA, and its implementing regulations require manufacturers of approved prescription drugs, devices, biologics, and medical supplies, for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with specific exceptions, to annually collect and report information on payments or transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members. The information reported each year is made publicly available on a searchable website. Failure to submit required information may result in civil monetary penalties.

In addition, several states now require prescription drug companies to report expenses relating to the marketing and promotion of drug products and to report gifts and payments to individual physicians in these states. Other states prohibit various other marketing-related activities. Still other states require the posting of information relating to clinical studies and their outcomes. In addition, California, Connecticut, Nevada, and Massachusetts require pharmaceutical companies to implement compliance programs and/or marketing codes. Several additional states are considering similar proposals. Compliance with these laws is difficult and time consuming, and companies that do not comply with these state laws face civil penalties.

Prescription drug advertising is subject to federal, state and foreign regulations. In the United States, the FDA regulates prescription drug promotion, including direct-to-consumer advertising. Prescription drug promotional materials must be submitted to the FDA in conjunction with their first use. Any distribution of prescription drug products and pharmaceutical samples must comply with the United States Prescription Drug Marketing Act, or PDMA, a part of the FDCA. In addition, Title II of the Federal Drug Quality and Security Act of 2013, known as the Drug Supply Chain Security Act, or DSCSA, has imposed new “track and trace” requirements on the distribution of prescription drug products by manufacturers, distributors, and other entities in the drug supply chain. The DSCSA requires product identifiers (i.e., serialization) on prescription drug products in order to eventually establish an electronic interoperable prescription product system to identify and trace certain prescription drugs distributed in the United States and preempts existing state drug pedigree laws and regulations on this topic. The DSCSA also establishes new requirements for the licensing of wholesale distributors and third-party logistic providers. The FDA is the process of finalizing regulations addressing wholesale distributors and third-party logistics providers. We serialize our product at both the package and homogeneous case level, pass serialization and required transaction information to our customers, and believe that we comply with all such requirements.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, sets standards governing the conduct of certain electronic healthcare transactions and protects the security and privacy of protected health information that is stored or transmitted electronically.  These include standards for common healthcare transactions, such as: claims information, plan eligibility, payment information and the use of electronic signatures; unique identifiers for providers, employers, health plans and individuals; and security, privacy, breach notification and enforcement.  HIPAA transaction regulations establish form, format and data content requirements for most electronic healthcare transactions, such as healthcare claims that are submitted electronically. The HIPAA privacy regulations establish comprehensive requirements relating to the use and disclosure of protected health information. The HIPAA security regulations establish minimum standards for the protection of protected health information that is stored or transmitted electronically. The HIPAA breach notification regulations establish the applicable requirements for notifying individuals, the HHS, and the media in the event of a data breach affecting protected health information. Violations of the privacy, security and breach notification regulations are punishable by civil and criminal penalties.

In addition to the federal HIPAA regulations, most states also have laws that regulate the collection, storage, use, retention, security, disclosure, transfer and other processing of health information and other confidential, sensitive and personal data. Certain of these laws grant individuals rights with respect to their information, and we may be required to expend significant resources to comply with these laws. For example, various states, such as California and Massachusetts, have implemented privacy laws and regulations, such as the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, that impose restrictive requirements regulating the use and disclosure of personally identifiable information, including protected health information. These laws in many cases are more restrictive than, and may not be preempted by, the HIPAA rules and may be subject to varying interpretations by courts and government agencies.

Competition

We have competitors both in the United States and internationally, including major multinational pharmaceutical companies, established biotechnology companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies, universities and other research institutions.institutions have intellectual property and other technology that is competitive with our mRNA technology platform and the aspects thereof. The gene therapy market is characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition and a strong emphasis on proprietary products. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, manufacturing, marketing, product development, technical and human resources than we do. Large pharmaceutical companies, in particular, have extensive experience in clinical testing, obtaining marketing approvals, recruiting patients and manufacturing pharmaceutical products. Some of these companies also have significantly greater research and marketing capabilities than we do, and may also have products that have been approved or are in late stages of development,strategic partnerships and collaborative arrangements in our target markets with leading companies and research institutions. Established pharmaceutical companies may also invest heavily to accelerate discovery and development of novel compounds or to in-license novel compoundstechnology that could make the product candidates that we developour mRNA technology platform or obsolete. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. As a result of all of these factors, our competitors may succeed in obtaining patent protection and/or marketing approval or discovering, developing and commercializing products intechnology that is competitive with or superior to our field before we do.mRNA technology platform.

There are a large number of companies developing or marketing treatments for cancer, including many major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. These treatments consist both of small molecule drug products, such as traditional chemotherapy, as well as novel immunotherapies. Our commercial opportunities could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have fewer or less severe effects, are more convenient, have a broader label, are marketed more effectively, are reimbursed or are less expensive than any products that we may develop. Our competitors also may obtain FDA, European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) or other marketing approval for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market. Even if the product candidates we develop achieve marketing approval, they may be priced at a significant premium over competitive products if any have been approved by then, resulting in reduced competitiveness.

Human Capital Resources

Employees

We performoperate in a highly competitive industry and recognize that our continued success relies upon our ability to attract, develop and retain a diverse team of talented individuals. We place high value on the satisfaction and well-being of our employees and operate with fair labor standards and industry-competitive compensation and benefits. As of AprilMarch 12, 2022,2024, we have ten had eight full-time employees, which includes fivefour research and development positions and five four administrative positions. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements.

Compensation, Benefits and Development

Our approach to employee compensation and benefits is designed to deliver cash, equity and benefit programs that are competitive with those offered by leading companies in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries to attract, motivate and retain talent with a focus on encouraging performance, promoting accountability and adherence to our values and alignment with the interests of our stockholders.
Our base pay program aims to compensate staff membersour employees relative to the value of the contributions of their role, which takes into account the skills, knowledge and abilities required to perform each position, as well as the experience brought to the job. We may also provide our employees with opportunities to earn performance-based cash and equity incentive compensation to reward the achievement of company-wide goals that are established annually and designed to drive aspects of our strategic priorities that support and advance our strategy across our company. Our employees are also eligible for the grant ofto receive equity awards under our long-term incentive program that are designed to align their interests of our employees with thatthe interests of our stockholders.  All employees also participate in a regular performance measurement process through which staff receive performance and development feedback, which is taken into account in determining annual compensation.

Our benefit programs are generally broad-based, promote health and overall well-being and emphasize saving for retirement. All employees are eligible to participate in the same health and retirement savings plans.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We are committed to conducting business in accordance with the highest ethical standards. Our Code of Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all our employees, emphasizes the importance of integrity, honesty, forthrightness, respect and fairness.  Our Code of Conduct and Ethics applies to all our employees, including those who are integrated into the Company through acquisitions.

Health, Safety and Well-Being

We actively promote the safety, health and well-being of our employees. We have continued to focusFor example, we focused on employee safety throughout the COVID-19 pandemic by implementing extensive safety measures, including without limitation,which included on-site COVID-19 testing protocols and flexible remote working options for most of our employees.

Corporate Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 1035 Cambridge Street, Suite 18A, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02141, and our phone number is (212) 582-1199. We maintain a website at www.eternatx.com. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge on our website at www.eternatx.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are available on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) website at www.sec.gov. Additionally, copies of our Annual Report will be made available, free of charge, upon written request. Information contained on, or accessible through, our website is not a part of and is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 1A.Risk Factors
 
Our business, financial condition and operating results can be affected by many factors, whether currently known or unknown, many of which are not exclusively within our control, including but not limited to those described below, any one or more of which could, directly or indirectly, cause our financial condition and operating results to differ materially from historical or anticipated future financial condition and operating results. Any of these factors, in whole or in part, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and stock price. We urge investors to carefully consider the risk factors described below in evaluating our stock and the information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Risks Related to Ownership of our Common Stock

We have a limited operating history and have never generated any product revenue.

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history. We were formed on September 27, 2018, for the purpose of consummating a business combination with IRX Therapeutics, Inc., which business combination was consummated on November 6, 2018. Since inception, we have incurred significant net losses. As of December 31, 2021, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $159.7 million. Since inception, we have financed our operations with capital contributions from the former beneficial holders of Brooklyn LLC’s Class A membership interests, as well as through the sale of our securities under the Purchase Agreements with Lincoln Capital and in connection with the PIPE Transaction.

Our ability to generate product revenue and become profitable depends upon our ability to successfully complete the development of, and obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for, our product candidates in development, including IRX-2. We have never been profitable, have no products approved for commercial sale, and have not generated any product revenue. It is possible that none of our product candidates will be approved for marketing. Failure to obtain regulatory approvals, or delays in obtaining regulatory approvals, may adversely affect the successful commercialization of any drugs or biologics that Brooklyn or its partners develop, may impose additional costs on us or our collaborators, may diminish any competitive advantages that we or our partners may attain, and/or may adversely affect our receipt of revenues or royalties.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses, or when or if we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Neither will we be able to predict the state of market competition which would adversely affect our potential revenues from product sales. Our expenses could increase beyond expectations if we are required by the FDA or comparable non-U.S. regulatory authorities to perform studies or clinical trials in addition to those that we currently anticipate. Even if any of our product candidates is approved for commercial sale, we anticipate incurring significant costs associated with their commercial launch. If we cannot successfully execute any one of the foregoing, our business may not succeed, and your investment will be negatively impacted.

Furthermore, we sometimes estimate for planning purposes the timing of the accomplishment of various scientific, clinical, regulatory and other product development objectives. These milestones may include our expectations regarding the commencement or completion of scientific studies, clinical trials, the submission of regulatory filings or commercialization objectives. From time to time, we may publicly announce the expected timing of some of these milestones, such as the completion of an ongoing clinical trial, the initiation of other clinical programs, the receipt of marketing approval or a commercial launch of a product. The achievement of many of these milestones may be outside of our control. All of these milestones are based on a variety of assumptions, which may cause the timing of achievement of the milestones to vary considerably from our estimates. If we fail to achieve milestones in the timeframes we expect, the commercialization of our product candidates may be delayed, we may not be entitled to receive certain contractual payments, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and future growth prospects.

We may not be successful in our efforts to identify and acquire or in-license additional product candidates, or to enter into collaborations or strategic alliances for the development and commercialization of any such future product candidates.

We may seek to identify and acquire or in-license novel product candidates. The process by which we identify them may fail to yield product candidates for clinical development for a number of reasons, including those discussed in these risk factors and also:

potential product candidates may, upon further study, be shown to have harmful side effects or other characteristics that indicate that they are unlikely to be products that will receive marketing approval and achieve market acceptance;
potential product candidates may not be effective in treating their targeted diseases; or
the acquisition or in-licensing transactions can entail numerous operational and functional risks, including exposure to unknown liabilities, disruption of our business, or incurrence of substantial debt or dilutive issuances of equity securities to pay transaction consideration or costs, higher than expected acquisition or integration costs.

We may choose to focus our efforts and resources on a potential product candidate that ultimately proves to be unsuccessful. We also cannot be certain that, following an acquisition or in-licensing transaction, we will achieve the revenue or specific net income that justifies such transaction. Further, time and resources spent identifying, acquiring and developing potential product candidates may distract management’s attention from our primary business or other development programs. Additional product candidates will require additional, time-consuming development efforts prior to commercial sale, including preclinical studies, clinical trials and approval by the FDA and/or applicable foreign regulatory authorities. All product candidates are prone to the risks of failure that are inherent in pharmaceutical product development. If we are unable to identify and acquire suitable product candidates for clinical development, this would adversely impact our business strategy, financial position and share price.

We may expend our limited resources to pursue a particular product candidate or indication and fail to capitalize on product candidates or indications that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.

Because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we intend to focus on developing product candidates for specific indications that we identify as most likely to succeed, in terms of both their potential for marketing approval and commercialization, and there can be no assurance that the products we focus on will succeed. Because we must decide where to focus our resources, we may forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or for other indications that may later prove to have greater commercial potential.

Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. Our spending on current and future research and development programs and product candidates for specific indications may not yield any commercially viable product candidates. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to the product candidate.

International expansion of our business exposes us to business, legal, regulatory, political, operational, financial and economic risks associated with conducting business outside of the United States.

Part of our business strategy involves potential expansion internationally with third-party collaborators to seek regulatory approval for our product candidates outside the United States. Doing business internationally involves a number of risks, including but not limited to:

multiple conflicting and changing laws and regulations such as tax laws, export and import restrictions, employment laws, anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws, regulatory requirements and other governmental approvals, permits and licenses;
failure by us or our collaborators to obtain appropriate licenses or regulatory approvals for the sale or use of IRX-2 or any other product candidate we may acquire or in license;
difficulties in managing foreign operations;
complexities associated with managing multiple payor-reimbursement regimes or self-pay systems;
financial risks, such as longer payment cycles, difficulty enforcing contracts and collecting accounts receivable and exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
reduced protection for intellectual property rights;
natural disasters, political and economic instability, including wars, terrorism and political unrest, outbreak of disease, boycotts, curtailment of trade and other business restrictions; and
failure to comply with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, including its books and records provisions and its anti-bribery provisions, the United Kingdom Bribery Act 2010, or U.K. Bribery Act, and similar anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions, for example by failing to maintain accurate information and control over sales or distributors’ activities.

Any of these risks, if encountered, could significantly harm our future international expansion and operations and consequently, negatively impact its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

If we are not successful in attracting and retaining highly qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy.

Our ability to compete in the highly competitive pharmaceuticals industry depends in large part upon the ability to attract highly qualified managerial, scientific and medical personnel. In order to induce valuable employees to remain with us, we intend to provide employees with stock options that vest over time. The value to employees of stock options that vest over time will be significantly affected by movements in the price of the common stock that it will not be able to control and may at any time be insufficient to counteract more lucrative offers from other companies.

Our management team has expertise in many different aspects of drug development. However, we will need to hire additional personnel as we continue to develop our product candidates. Competition for skilled personnel in the pharmaceutical industry is intense and competition for experienced scientists may limit our ability to hire and retain highly qualified personnel on acceptable terms. Despite our efforts to retain valuable employees, members of our management, scientific and medical teams may terminate their employment with us on short notice. Our success also depends on our ability to continue to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled junior, mid-level, and senior managers as well as junior, mid-level, and senior scientific and medical personnel.

Other pharmaceutical companies with which we compete for qualified personnel have greater financial and other resources, different risk profiles, and a longer history in the industry than we do. Other pharmaceutical companies also may provide more diverse opportunities and better chances for career advancement. Some of these characteristics may be more appealing to high-quality candidates than what Brooklyn has to offer. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain high-quality personnel, the rate and success at which we can develop and commercialize product candidates would be limited.

Risks Related to our Financial PositionBusiness and Capital Requirements
We expect to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability.

Investment in biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that a product candidate will fail to gain regulatory approval or fail to become commercially viable. We have never generated any product revenue, and we cannot estimate with precision the extent of our future losses. We do not currently have any products that are available for commercial sale, and we may never generate product revenue or achieve profitability.

We expect that our research and development expenses in connection with our development programs for product candidates will continue to be significant. In addition, as we prepare for and if we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur increased sales, marketing and manufacturing expenses. As a result, we expect to continue to incur significant and increasing operating losses and negative cash flows for the foreseeable future. These losses have harmed and will continue to harm our results of operations, financial position and working capital.

There can be no assurance that we will be profitable even if we successfully commercialize IRX - 2 or any other product candidate we may acquire or in-license (including any products that may be developed from the licensed technology with Factor and Novellus, Ltd.). If we do successfully obtain regulatory approval to market any of our product candidates, our revenue will be dependent upon, in part and among other things, the size of the markets in the territories for which we gain regulatory approval, the number of competitors in such markets, the accepted price for any such product candidate and whether we own the commercial rights for those territories. If the indication approved by regulatory authorities is narrower than we expect, or the treatment population is narrowed by competition, physician choice or treatment guidelines, we may not generate significant revenue from sales of any of our product candidates, even if approved. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Failure to become and remain profitable may adversely impact the market price of the common stock and our ability to raise capital and continue operations.
We own only a 25% interest in NoveCite, Inc., and that interest may be diluted unless we invest additional funds.
 
In July 2021, we acquired 25% of the outstanding common stock of NoveCite, Inc. As a result, we will only be entitled to a portion of any benefits that flow from the development by NoveCite, Inc. of any product candidates. In the event that NoveCite, Inc. issues additional equity securities in the future, our percentage ownership would be diluted unless we were to invest additional funds. Dilution of our equity ownership would decrease our portion of any benefit that might be derived from a NoveCite, Inc. product candidate’s successful development. If we were to determine that it would be in the best interests of our company and stockholders to invest additional amounts in NoveCite, Inc. to prevent dilution of our interests, the required funds may not be available to us on reasonable terms, or at all.
We may not generate the expected benefits of our Acquisition and it could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and increase our expenses.

We entered into the Acquisition Agreement to acquire all the outstanding equity interests of Novellus, Inc. and Novellus, Ltd., which we collectively refer to as Novellus, with the expectation that the Acquisition will result in various benefits, including accelerating our research and development efforts in the gene editing and mRNA spaces. Achieving the anticipated benefits of the Acquisition is subject to a number of uncertainties, including whether our business and the business of Novellus can be integrated in an efficient and effective manner. We cannot assure you that we will be able to accurately forecast the performance or ultimate impact of the Acquisition.

It is possible that the integration process following the Acquisition could take longer than anticipated and could result in unforeseen expenses, the disruption of our ongoing business, processes and systems, or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, practices, policies and compensation arrangements, any of which could adversely affect our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the Acquisition. There may be increased risk due to integrating financial reporting and internal control systems. The integration process is subject to a number of uncertainties, and no assurance can be given that the anticipated benefits, expense savings and synergies of the Acquisition will be realized or, if realized, the timing of their realization. Failure to achieve these anticipated benefits could result in increased costs or decreases in the amount of expected revenues and could adversely affect our future business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.

We have incurred and will continue to incur non-recurring expenses in connection with the Acquisition, including legal, accounting and other expenses. Additional unanticipated costs may be incurred following consummation of the Acquisition during the integration of the business of Novellus into our business. We cannot be certain that the realization of efficiencies related to the integration of Novellus will offset in the near term, or at all, the transaction and integration costs of the Acquisition and any losses from undiscovered liabilities not covered by indemnification provisions from the sellers of Novellus under the Acquisition Agreement or otherwise.

We may acquire businesses, assets or products, or form strategic alliances, in the future, and we may not realize the benefits of such acquisitions.

We may acquire additional businesses, assets or products, form strategic alliances or create joint ventures with third parties that we believe will complement or augment our existing business. If we acquire businesses with promising markets or technologies, we may not be able to realize the benefit of acquiring such businesses if we are unable to successfully integrate them with our existing operations and company culture. We may encounter numerous difficulties in developing, manufacturing and marketing any new acquisition. Difficulties may prevent us from realizing its expected benefits or enhancing our business. We cannot assure you that, following any such acquisition, we will achieve the expected synergies to justify the transaction.Industry

We will require substantial additional capital to fund our operations and if we fail to obtain the necessary financing,execute our business strategy, and we may not be able to complete the developmentraise adequate capital on a timely basis, on favorable terms, or at all.
Based on our current financial condition and commercializationforecasts of any of our product candidates.

Brooklyn expects to spend substantialavailable cash, we will not have sufficient capital to completefund our operations for the development12 months following the issuance date of seek regulatory approvals for and commercialize IRX-2, perhaps with development partners, as well as any of other product candidate it may develop.the accompanying consolidated financial statements. We can provide no assurance that we will requirebe able to obtain additional capital when needed, on favorable terms, or at all. If we cannot raise capital when needed, on favorable terms or at all, we will need to complete the developmentreevaluate our planned operations and potential commercialization of our product candidates. Because the length of time and activities associatedmay need to reduce expenses, file for bankruptcy, reorganize, merge with successful development of our product candidates are highly uncertain,another entity, or cease operations. If we arebecome unable to estimate with certaintycontinue as a going concern, we may have to liquidate our assets, and might realize significantly less than the actual funds we will require for developmentvalues at which they are carried on our financial statements, and any approved marketing and commercialization activities. stockholders may lose all or part of their investment in our common stock.
Our future funding requirements, both near- and long-term, will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:

 
our ability to enter into strategic partnerships to deploy our mRNA technology platform, and the timing, progress, coststerms of such strategic partnerships, including the economic terms and results of our INSPIRE trial for the treatment of squamous cell cancer of the head and neck;proceeds we receive, if any, thereunder;
 
the costspace and success of our potential strategic partners in developing and commercializing their product candidates and/or products that deploy our mRNA technology platform and the proceeds to us, if any, other clinical trials we may initiate, including the costs to conduct the study and to produce the supply of product that may be required for our own studies or for investigator-sponsored studies;as a result;
 the outcome, timing and cost of meeting regulatory requirements established by the FDA and other comparable foreign regulatory authorities;
the cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing itsour patent claims and other intellectual property rights;
 
the cost of defending potential intellectual property disputes, including patent infringement actions brought by third parties against itus or any of its currentour potential strategic partners or future product candidates;collaborators; and
 
the effect of competing market developments;
the cost and timing of completion of commercial-scale manufacturing activities;
the cost of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities for our products in regions where we choose to commercialize our products on our own; and
the initiation, progress, timing and results of the commercialization of our product candidates, if approved for commercial sale.developments.

Based on currently available information and our ongoing operations, we believe that our existing cash, inclusive of the funding committed by certain beneficial holders of Brooklyn LLC’s Class A membership interests and received under the Purchase Agreements with Lincoln Capital and in connection with the PIPE Transactions, will not be sufficient for us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements through the twelve-month period subsequent to the issuance date of this report.  We intendmay seek to raise additional sourcescapital through a variety of means, including through equity, equity-linked or debt securities offerings, collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties. Our past success in raising capital through equity and convertible note offerings should not be viewed as an indication we will be successful in raising capital through those or any other means in the future. We expect that our ability to raise additional capital and the amount of capital whichavailable to us will depend not only on progress we make toward entering into strategic partnerships to deploy our mRNA technology platform and the terms thereof, but also on factors outside of our control, such as the pace and success of our potential strategic partners in developing and commercializing their product candidates and/or products that deploy our mRNA technology platform and the proceeds to us, if any, as a result, macroeconomic and financial market conditions.
To the extent that we raise additional capital by issuing equity or equity-linked securities, existing stockholder ownership may experience substantial dilution, and the securities may include preferred shares with liquidation or other preferences that could harm the rights of a common stockholder. Servicing the interest and principal repayment obligations under our outstanding convertible notes and under any other debt we incur will divert funds that might otherwise be available to support our operations. In addition, debt financing involves covenants that restrict our ability to operate our business. To the extent we raise additional capital through arrangements with third parties, such arrangements would likely require us to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us.
Unstable and unfavorable market and economic conditions may harm our ability to raise additional capital. An economic downturn, recession or recessionary concerns, increased inflation, rising interest rates, adverse developments affecting financial institutions or the financial services industry, or the occurrence or continued occurrence of events similar to those in recent years, such as the COVID-19 pandemic or other public health emergencies, geopolitical conflict, natural/environmental disasters, terrorist attacks, strained relations between the U.S. and a number of other countries, social and political discord and unrest in the formU.S. and other countries, and government shutdowns, among others, increase market volatility and have long-term adverse effects on the U.S. and global economies and financial markets. Volatility and deterioration in the financial markets and liquidity constraints or other adverse developments affecting financial institutions may make equity or debt financings more difficult, more costly or more dilutive and may increase competition for, or limit the availability of, debt, grants or equity.  funding from other third-party sources, such as from strategic collaborations.
We cannot be certain that additional capital will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development or commercialization of any product candidate,our business activities, or potentially discontinue operations altogether. In addition, attempting to secure additional capital may divert the time and attention of our management from day-to-day activities and harm its ability to execute on our business strategy.
We have a limited operating history, have incurred significant losses since our inception and expect to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future, which, together with our limited financial resources and substantial capital requirements, make it difficult to assess our prospects.
We have a limited operating history upon which to evaluate our business and prospects. We were formed in September 2018, for the purpose of consummating a business combination with IRX Therapeutics, Inc., which business combination was consummated in November 2018. Since inception, we have incurred significant net losses. As of December 31, 2023, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $187.0 million. Since inception, we have primarily financed our operations by raising capital through the sale of shares of our common stock, warrants to purchase shares of our common stock and convertible notes.
We have not been profitable since we commenced operations and may never achieve profitability. We devoted significant resources to the development of our former product candidate, development efforts. Because of the numerous risksIRX-2, and uncertainties associated within 2022 we determined to cease the development and potential commercialization of its product candidates,IRX-2. Our near-term focus is now on entering into strategic partnerships to deploy our mRNA technology platform. As discussed above, we are unablemust raise additional capital to estimate the amounts of increased capital outlays, operating expenditures and capital requirements associated with its current product development programs.

Raising additional funds by issuing equity securities may cause dilution to existing holders, raising additional funds through debt financings may involve restrictive covenants, and raising funds through lending and licensing arrangements may restrictfinance our operations and remain a going concern and adequate additional capital may not be available to us on a timely basis, or require us to relinquish proprietary rights.at all.

We depend substantially, and expect that significant additional capital will be needed in the future to continue to depend, on in-licensed intellectual property. Such licenses impose obligations on our planned operations. Until such time,business, and if ever,we fail to comply with those obligations, we could lose license rights, which would substantially harm our business.
We rely on patents, know-how and proprietary technology licensed from Factor Limited under the A&R Factor License Agreement. We may in the future become party to additional license agreements pursuant to which we in-license key intellectual property. The A&R Factor License Agreement imposes various sublicense fees and other obligations on us. For example, we are obligated to pay the expenses incurred by Factor Limited in preparing, filing, prosecuting and maintaining the Factor Patents and have agreed to bear all costs and expenses associated with enforcing and defending the Factor Patents in any action or proceeding arising from pursuit of sublicensing opportunities under the license granted under the A&R Factor License Agreement. Factor Limited has customary termination rights under the A&R Factor License Agreement, including in connection with certain uncured material breaches of the A&R Factor License Agreement and specified bankruptcy events. Any termination of our existing or future licenses could result in the loss of significant rights and would harm our business significantly.
Disputes may also arise between us and our licensors regarding intellectual property subject to a license agreement, including:
the scope of rights granted under the license agreement and other interpretation-related issues;
whether and the extent to which our technology and processes infringe intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to the licensing agreement;
our right to sublicense patents and other intellectual property to third parties under the license agreement;
our diligence obligations under the agreement and what activities satisfy those diligence obligations;
the priority of invention of patented technology; and
the ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from any joint creation or use of intellectual property by our licensors and us or our partners.
If disputes over intellectual property that we can generate substantial product revenue, we expecthave licensed, or license in the future, prevent or impair our ability to financemaintain our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, strategic alliances and license and development agreements or other collaborations. To the extent that we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, existing stockholder ownership may experience substantial dilution, and the securities may include preferred shares with liquidation or other preferences that could harm the rights of a common stockholder.

If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution orcurrent licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to its technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates, or grant licenses on acceptable terms, that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds when needed, we may be requiredunable to delay, limit, reduce or terminate its product development or future commercialization efforts, or grantsuccessfully enter into strategic partnerships. In addition, the resolution of any such disputes could narrow what we believe to be the scope of our rights to develop and market product candidates thatthe relevant intellectual property or technology, or increase what we would otherwise develop and market themselves.

Risks Relatedbelieve to be our Business and Industry
We face business disruption and related risks resulting fromfinancial or other obligations under the pandemicrelevant agreement, either of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), which could have a material adverse effect on our business, plan.financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

TheAdditionally, we may have limited control over the maintenance, prosecution or enforcement of rights we in-license, and we may also have limited control over activities previously or separately conducted by our licensors. For example, we cannot be certain that activities conducted by Factor Limited or any other present or future licensors have been or will be conducted in compliance with applicable laws and regulations or will result in valid and enforceable patents and other intellectual property rights. We may also have limited control over other intellectual property that is not licensed to us but that may be related to our in-licensed intellectual property. We may have limited control over the manner in which our licensors initiate an infringement proceeding against a third-party infringer or the intellectual property or defend certain of the intellectual property that is licensed to us. It is possible that the licensors’ infringement proceedings or defense activities may be less vigorous than had we conducted them ourselves.
If we are unable to successfully obtain rights to required third-party intellectual property rights or maintain the existing intellectual property rights we have, we may have to abandon development of the relevant program or drug candidate and our product candidates has been,business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could continuesuffer.
We are generally also subject to be, disrupted and materially adversely affected by past and continuing impactsall of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thissame risks with respect to protection of intellectual property that we own, as we are for intellectual property that we license. If we or our licensors fail to adequately protect the intellectual property underlying our mRNA technology platform and any other in-licensed intellectual property, our ability to enter into strategic partnerships could materially suffer.
Our intellectual property rights may not adequately protect our business.
The degree of future protection afforded by our intellectual property rights is largelyuncertain because intellectual property rights have limitations and may not adequately protect our business. For example:
we, or our license partners or current or future collaborators, might not have been the first to make the inventions covered by the issued patent or pending patent application that we license or may own in the future;
we, or our license partners or current or future collaborators, might not have been the first to file patent applications covering certain of our or their inventions;
others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating any of our owned or licensed intellectual property rights;
it is possible that our pending licensed patent applications or those that we may own in the future will not lead to issued patents;
issued patents that we hold rights to may be held invalid or unenforceable, including as a result of measures imposedlegal challenges by our competitors or other third parties;
our competitors or other third parties might conduct research and development activities in countries where we do not have patent rights and then use the governmentsinformation learned from such activities to develop competitive products for sale;
we may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable;
the patents of others may harm our business;
we may choose not to file a patent in order to maintain certain trade secrets or proprietary know- how, and hospitals in affected regions, businessesa third party may subsequently file a patent covering such intellectual property; and schools were suspended due to quarantines intended to contain this outbreak. The spread
our trade secrets or proprietary know-how may be unlawfully disclosed, thereby losing their trade secret or proprietary status.
Should any of COVID-19 from China to other countries resulted in the Director General of the World Health Organization declaring COVID-19 a pandemic in March 2020. While the constraints of the pandemic are being lifted, we are still assessing the longer-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our development plans, and on the ability to conduct our clinical trials. COVID-19these events occur, they could continue to disrupt production and cause delays in the supply and delivery of products used in our operations, may affect our operations, including the conduct of clinical studies, or the ability of regulatory bodies to grant approvals or supervise our candidates and products, may further divert the attention and efforts of the medical community to coping with the COVID-19 and disrupt the marketplace in which we operate and may have a material adverse effectseffect on our operations. COVID-19business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We are substantially dependent on intellectual property we have in-licensed from Factor Limited, and if we lose the license to such intellectual property or the A&R Factor License Agreement is terminated for any reason, our ability to enter into strategic partnerships would be harmed, and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.
Our business is substantially dependent upon the mRNA technology platform licensed from Factor Limited. Pursuant to the A&R Factor License Agreement, Factor Limited has customary termination rights, including in connection with certain uncured material breaches of the A&R Factor License Agreement, failure to make payments and specified bankruptcy events. Our ability to enter into strategic partnerships or develop therapeutics products using the Factor Patents depends entirely on the effectiveness and continuation of the A&R Factor License Agreement. If we lose the right to license any of the mRNA technology platform, our ability to enter into strategic would be harmed.  Further, if the A&R Factor License Agreement is terminated, there is no guarantee that we will be able to enter into a new license agreement that aligns with our business strategy on the same or similar terms, if at all, and our competitors could in-license the technology, which would result in a significant market disadvantage to us.
We or our licensors may also affectbe subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of the patents and other intellectual property that we own or license now or in the future.
We or our licensors may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators or other third parties have an ownership interest in the patents and intellectual property that we in-license or that we may own or in-license in the future. While it is our policy to require our employees or contractors who may be involved in the development of intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to us, we may be unsuccessful in executing such an agreement with each party who in fact develops intellectual property that we regard as our own or such assignment may not be self-executing, for example, as part of employment or consulting agreements, or may be breached. Our licensors may face similar obstacles. Litigation may be necessary to defend against any claims challenging inventorship or ownership, including in derivation proceedings in the USPTO. If we or our licensors fail in defending any such claims, we may have to pay monetary damages and employeesmay lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, intellectual property, which could adversely impact our business, results of operations and operations at suppliers thatfinancial condition.
We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to develop and maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may resultnot be able to accurately report our financial results in delays or disruptionsa timely manner, which may adversely affect investor confidence in supply. In addition, a recession or market correction resulting from the spread of COVID-19 couldus, and materially and adversely affect our business and the valueoperating results.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our common stock. Additionally, ifannual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis. Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud.
In prior periods, we identified a material weakness as discussed below. We were unable to timely file our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the COVID-19 pandemicthree months ended March 31, 2022 with the SEC due to identifying errors in our financial statements reported in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 during our preparation of the financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2022. On June 30, 2022, we filed an amendment to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 to correct the errors in our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the quarters ended June 30, 2020, September 30, 2020, March 31, 2021, June 30, 2021 and September 30, 2021. Management concluded that the errors were the result of accounting personnel’s lack of technical proficiency in the accounting for complex matters. This material weakness remained unremediated as of December 31, 2023.
As disclosed in Part II, Item 9A to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance concluded that, as of December 31, 2023, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective and did not provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. For a discussion of management’s consideration of its material weaknesses and plans for remediation, see Part II, Item 9A: Controls and Procedures included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Management has implemented measures designed to ensure that the deficiencies contributing to the ineffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting are remediated, such that the internal controls are designed, implemented and operating effectively. The remediation actions implemented to date include: enhancing the business process controls related to reviews over technical, complex, and non-recurring transactions; providing additional training to accounting personnel and using an external accounting advisor to review management’s conclusions on certain technical, complex and non-recurring matters. We will continue to season and further enhance the controls to ensure that they will continue to operate effectively for a significant impactsufficient period of time before management can make conclusions on the operating effectiveness. These remediation measures may be costly and there is no assurance that these initiatives will ultimately have the intended effects.
If we identify any additional material weaknesses in the future, any such newly identified material weakness could limit our ability to prevent or detect a misstatement of our accounts or disclosures and could result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements. In such case, we may be unable to maintain compliance with securities law requirements regarding timely filing of periodic reports, investors may lose confidence in our financial reporting and our stock price may decline as a result. We cannot assure you that the measures we have taken to date, or any measures we may take in the future, will be sufficient to avoid potential future material weaknesses.
We may face litigation and other risks as a result of the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.
We identified a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting. As a result of the material weakness, restating our previously issued financial statements, and other matters that may in the future be raised by the SEC, we may face the potential for litigation or other disputes which may include, among others, claims invoking the federal and state securities laws, contractual claims or other claims arising from the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have no knowledge of any such litigation or dispute. However, we can provide no assurance that such litigation or dispute will not arise in the future. Any such litigation or dispute, whether successful or not, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial results for an extended period of time,condition or our liquidity and cash resources could be negatively impacted. The extentability to which the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing global efforts to contain its spread will impact our operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain, and include the duration, severity and scope of the pandemic and the actions taken to contain or treat the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, the specific clinical outcomes, or future pandemic related impacts of emerging COVID-19 variants cannot be reliably predicted.complete a business combination.

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures, cyber-attacks or a deficiency in our cyber-security.

Our computer systems, as well as those of various third parties on which it relies,we rely, may sustain damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access, data breaches, phishing attacks, cybercriminals, natural disasters (including hurricanes and earthquakes), terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures. We rely on our third-party providers to implement effective security measures and identify and correct for any such failures, deficiencies or breaches. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. If such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our drug development and other programs. For example, the loss of nonclinical or clinical trial data from completed, ongoing or planned trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of or damage to our data, or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of personal, confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and the further development of any product candidate could be delayed.

We are substantially dependent on the success of our internal development programs and our product pipeline candidates may not successfully complete clinical trials, receive regulatory approval or be successfully commercialized.

Our future success will depend heavily on the success of our development of IRX-2, successful clinical development of our in-licensed cell and gene therapy technologies and any other products we may acquire, license or develop (including any products that may be developed from the licensed technology if Brooklyn exercises its option to license certain technology from Novellus). We expect to continue our efforts and expenditures related to the continued clinical evaluation of our lead product candidate, IRX-2, and the monotherapy and combination studies related thereto. We expect to continue our efforts towards the commercialization of such product candidates following regulatory approval, if received. Additionally, we expect to devote substantial resources and efforts to the preclinical and clinical evaluation of new cell and gene therapy product platforms that we may acquire or in-license (including any products that may be developed from the licensed technology with Factor and Novellus, Ltd.). Accordingly, our business currently depends heavily on the successful completion of our clinical trials for its product candidates and subsequent regulatory approval and commercialization of such product candidates. Our ability to successfully commercialize IRX-2 and any other product we may acquire, license or develop, will depend on, among other things, our ability to:


successfully complete pre-clinical studies and clinical trials deemed adequate by regulatory authorities and obtain and maintain regulatory approval for the marketing of our product candidates;

receive regulatory approvals from the FDA, the EMA and other similar regulatory authorities;

establish and maintain collaborations with third parties for the development and/or commercialization of our product candidates, or otherwise build and maintain strong development, sales, distribution and marketing capabilities that are sufficient to develop products and launch commercial sales of any approved products, including establishing sales, marketing and distribution systems for our product candidates;

obtain coverage and adequate reimbursement from payors such as government health care systems, pharmacy benefit managers, and insurance companies and achieve commercially attractive levels of pricing;

secure acceptance of our product candidates from physicians, health care payors, patients and the medical community;

produce, through a validated process, in manufacturing facilities inspected and approved by regulatory authorities, including the FDA, sufficiently large quantities of our product candidates to permit successful commercialization;

manage our spending as expenses increase due to government mandated post-approval clinical trials and commercialization;

obtain and enforce sufficient intellectual property rights for any approved products and product candidates, maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio;

add operational, financial, and management information systems; personnel, including personnel to support its clinical, manufacturing and planned future commercialization efforts and operations as a public company;

conduct internal or contract manufacturing meeting specifications and in compliance with applicable cGMPs; and


initiate and continue relationships with third-party suppliers and manufacturers or continue to further develop our own manufacturing capabilities and have commercial quantities of our product candidates manufactured at acceptable cost and quality levels and in compliance with the FDA and other regulatory requirements.

Conducting pre-clinical studies in animals and clinical studies in humans is a lengthy, time-consuming, and expensive process. In order to obtain FDA approval to market a new pharmaceutical product, we must demonstrate proof of safety and efficacy of the product. We cannot be certain that our clinical trials for our product candidates will be successful or that any of our product candidates will receive approval from the FDA, the EMA or any other comparable regulatory authority.

The research, testing, manufacturing, labeling, approval, sale, marketing and distribution of products are, and will remain, subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory authorities in the United States and in other countries that each have differing regulations. While we have submitted an IND in the United States and comparable drug approval filings with certain foreign regulatory authorities, the timing of the filing for marketing approval in the United States or comparable filing in other nations is unknown. We must provide these regulatory authorities with data from preclinical studies and clinical trials that demonstrate our product candidates are safe and effective for specific indications before they can be approved for commercial distribution. Securing regulatory approval requires the submission of extensive preclinical, nonclinical and clinical data and other supporting information for each proposed therapeutic indication, in order to establish the product’s safety and efficacy for each intended use. In the case of biologics the data must also include potency and purity for each product.  There are risks associated with this process that may include:


preclinical studies and clinical trials are long, expensive and unpredictable processes that can be subject to extensive delays;

we cannot guarantee that any clinical trials will be conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all;

it may take several years and require significant expenditures to complete the preclinical studies and clinical trials necessary to commercialize a product candidate, and delays or failure are inherently unpredictable and can occur at any stage.

we may also be required to conduct additional clinical trials or other testing of our product candidates beyond the trials and testing that we contemplate, which may lead to us incurring additional unplanned costs or result in delays in clinical development;

we may be required to redesign or otherwise modify our plans with respect to an ongoing or planned clinical trial and changing the design of a clinical trial can be expensive and time consuming; and

an unfavorable outcome in one or more trials would be a major setback for our product candidates and for us. It may require us to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more product development programs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and future growth prospects.

In order to obtain FDA approval to market a new pharmaceutical product, we must demonstrate proof of safety and efficacy of the product in humans. To meet these requirements, we must conduct “adequate and well controlled” clinical studies.  The length of time to complete these studies may vary substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty, and intended use of the product candidate, and often can be several years or more per study. We cannot be certain that our clinical trials for our product candidates will be successful or that any of our product candidates will receive approval from the FDA, the EMA or any other comparable regulatory authority. Of the large number of drugs in development in the pharmaceutical industry, only a small percentage result in the submission of a new drug marketing application to the FDA and even fewer are approved for commercialization. The FDA or other foreign regulatory authorities may delay, limit or deny approval of any of our product candidates for many reasons, including:

We may not be able to demonstrate that any product candidate is safe or effective as a treatment for any of our currently or future targeted indications to the satisfaction of the FDA or other relevant regulatory authorities.
The relevant regulatory authorities may require additional pre-approval studies or clinical trials which would increase our costs and prolong development timelines or could grant conditional approval with a requirement to perform additional studies at a significant cost.

The results of our clinical trials may not meet the level of statistical or clinical significance required by the FDA or other relevant regulatory authorities for marketing approval.
The FDA or other relevant regulatory authorities may disagree with the number, design, size, conduct or implementation of our clinical trials, including the design of its future pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials.
Contract Research Organizations (“CROs”) that we may retain to conduct clinical trials may take actions outside of our control, or otherwise commit errors or violations of protocols, that adversely impact our clinical trials and ability to obtain market approvals.
The FDA or other relevant regulatory authorities may not find the data from nonclinical studies or clinical trials sufficient to demonstrate that the clinical and other benefits of these products outweigh their safety risks.
The FDA or other relevant regulatory authorities may disagree with our interpretation of data or significance of results from the nonclinical studies and clinical trials of IRX - 2 or any other product candidate we may acquire or in-license or may require that it conduct additional studies.
The FDA or other relevant regulatory authorities may not accept data generated from our clinical trial sites.
If our MA or other foreign application is reviewed by an advisory committee, the FDA or other relevant regulatory authority, may have difficulties scheduling an advisory committee meeting in a timely manner or the advisory committee may recommend against approval of such application or may recommend that the FDA or other relevant regulatory authority require, as a condition of approval, additional nonclinical studies or clinical trials, limitations on approved labeling or distribution and use restrictions.
The FDA or other relevant regulatory authorities may require development of a REMS, or its equivalent, as a condition of approval.
The FDA or other relevant regulatory authorities may require additional post-marketing studies and/or a patient registry, which would be costly.
The FDA or other relevant regulatory authorities may find the chemistry, manufacturing and controls data insufficient to support the quality of IRX - 2 or any other product candidate we may acquire or in-license.
The FDA or other relevant regulatory authorities may identify deficiencies in the manufacturing processes or facilities of our third-party manufacturer or our own manufacturing processes or facilities.
The FDA or other relevant regulatory authorities may change their approval policies or adopt new regulations.

Many of the factors that cause or lead to a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval for our product candidates. The FDA, EMA or any other comparable regulatory authority may disagree with our clinical trial design and our interpretation of data from clinical trials or may change the requirements for approval even after it has reviewed and commented on the design for our clinical trials. In connection with clinical trials of our product candidates, we face a number of risks, including risks that:


a product candidate is ineffective or inferior to existing approved products for the same indications;

patients may die or suffer adverse effects for reasons that may or may not be related to the product candidate being tested;

a product candidate causes or is associated with unacceptable toxicity or has unacceptable side effects;

the results may not confirm the positive results of earlier trials;

we are unable to manufacture sufficient quantities of stable and qualified materials under cGMP for use in clinical studies;

we fail to recruit a sufficient number of patients or we have slower than expected rates of patient recruitment;

modification of clinical study protocols is necessary;

there may be changes in regulatory requirements for clinical studies;

there is a lack of effectiveness during clinical studies;

there is an emergence of unforeseen safety issues;

there may be delays, suspension, or termination of the clinical studies due to the IRB responsible for overseeing the study at a particular study site;


there could be government or regulatory delays or “clinical holds” requiring suspension or termination of the studies; and

our collaborators may be unable or unwilling to perform under their contracts.

Delays associated with products for which we are directly conducting clinical studies may cause us to incur additional operating expenses.  An unfavorable outcome in one or more trials would be a major setback for our product candidates and for us. It may require us to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more product development programs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and future growth prospects.financial condition. See Part I, Item 1C. Cybersecurity for more information on information regarding our cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance.

Furthermore, even if we do receive regulatory approval to market our product candidates, any such approval may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses or patient populations for which we may market the product.

The failure of clinical studies to demonstrate safety and effectiveness for the desired indications could harm the development of that product candidate and other product candidates. This failure could cause us to abandon a product candidate and could delay development of other product candidates. Any delay in, or termination of, our clinical studies would delay the filing of its marketing application with the FDA and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize its product candidates and generate product revenues. Any change in, or termination of, our clinical studies could materially harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Any of these events could harm our business and operations and could negatively impact the price of our common stock.

Results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials may not be predictive of results of future clinical trials.

The outcome of preclinical studies and early clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials, and interim results of clinical trials do not necessarily predict success in the results of completed clinical trials. Many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in late-stage clinical trials after achieving positive results in earlier development, and we could face similar setbacks. For example, results from the INSPIRE trial of IRX-2 may not be positive or replicated at clinical trial sites in a later stage clinical trial conducted by us or our collaborators. The design of a clinical trial can determine whether its results will support approval of a product and flaws in the design of a clinical trial may not become apparent until the clinical trial is well advanced. We may be unable to design and execute a clinical trial to support marketing approval.

Preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses. Many companies that believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval for the product candidates. Even if we, or any collaborators, believe that the results of clinical trials for our product candidates warrant marketing approval, the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree and may not grant marketing approval of our product candidates.

In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety or efficacy results between different clinical trials of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in trial procedures set forth in protocols, differences in the size and type of the patient populations, changes in and adherence to the dosing regimen and other clinical trial protocols and the rate of dropout among clinical trial participants. If we fail to receive positive resultsare not successful in clinical trials of our product candidates, the development timelineattracting and regulatory approval and commercialization prospects for our most advanced product candidates, and, correspondingly, our business and financial prospects would be negatively impacted.

Clinical studies required for our product candidates may involve combination with other products which may result in unpredictable outcomes

In some cases, IRX-2 and any other productretaining highly qualified personnel, we may acquire or in-license (including any products that may be developed from the licensed technology if Brooklyn exercises its option to exclusively license certain technology from Novellus) may be expected to be used in combination with approved therapies that may have significant adverse event profiles. During the course of treatment, these patients could suffer adverse medical events or die for reasons that may or may not be related to our product candidates. We cannot ensure that safety issues will not arise with respect to our product candidates in clinical development. In addition, several of our IRX-2 studies focus on IRX-2 in conjunction with current preferred treatments for certain types of cancer, including head and neck cancers. If the drugs being studied in conjunction with IRX-2 are found to be faulty in any way, or if they fall out of favor as a preferred treatment, our clinical studies may be adversely effected, as we may have to restart such studies with the newer, preferred treatment in conjunction with IRX-2. Any delay in obtaining or failure to obtain required approvals could negatively impact our ability to generate revenue from the particular product candidate, which likely would result in significant harm to our financial position and adversely impact the price of our common stock.

We may find it difficult to enroll patients in our clinical trials, which could delay or prevent us from proceeding with clinical trials of our product candidates.

Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in clinical trials of our product candidates is critical to our success. The timing of our clinical trials depends on our ability to recruit patients to participate as well as the completion of required follow-up periods. Patients may be unwilling to participate in our clinical trials because of negative publicity from adverse events related to novel therapeutic approaches, competitive clinical trials for similar patient populations, the existence of current treatments or for other reasons. Enrollment risks are heightened with respect to certain indications that we may target for one or more of our product candidates that may be rare diseases, which may limit the pool of patients that may be enrolled in our planned clinical trials. The timeline for recruiting patients, conducting trials and obtaining regulatory approval of our product candidates may be delayed, including as a result of the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, which could result in increased costs, delays in advancing our product candidates, delays in testing the effectiveness of our product candidates or termination of the clinical trials altogether.

We may not be able to identify, recruit and enroll a sufficient numbersuccessfully implement our business strategy.
Our ability to compete in the highly competitive life science industry depends in large part upon the ability to attract highly qualified personnel. In order to induce valuable employees to remain with us, we intend to provide employees with stock options and/or restricted stock units that vest over time. The value to employees of patients, or those withstock options that vest over time will be significantly affected by movements in the required or desired characteristics, to complete our clinical trials in a timely manner. For example, due to the natureprice of the indicationscommon stock that it will not be able to control and may at any time be insufficient to counteract more lucrative offers from other companies.
Competition for skilled personnel in our industry is intense and competition for experienced scientists may limit our ability to hire and retain highly qualified personnel on acceptable terms. Despite our efforts to retain valuable employees, our employees may terminate their employment with us on short notice.
Other companies with which we compete for qualified personnel have greater financial and other resources, different risk profiles, and a longer history in the industry than we do, and such companies also may provide more diverse opportunities and better chances for career advancement. Some of these characteristics may be more appealing to high-quality candidates than what we have to offer. If we are initially targeting, patients with advanced disease progression may not be suitable candidates for treatment withunable to continue to attract and retain high-quality personnel, our product candidates and may be ineligible for enrollment in our clinical trials. Therefore, early diagnosis in patients with our target diseases is critical to our success. Patient enrollment and trial completion is affected by factors including the:

size of the patient population and process for identifying subjects;
design of the trial protocol;
eligibility and exclusion criteria;
safety profile, to date, of the product candidate under study;
perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under study;
perceived risks and benefits of our approach to treatment of diseases;
availability of competing therapies and clinical trials;
severity of the disease under investigation;
degree of progression of the subject’s disease at the time of enrollment;
proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective subjects;
ability to obtain and maintain subject consent;
risks that enrolled patients will drop out before completion of the trial;
patient referral services of physicians; and
ability to monitor subjects adequately during and after treatment.

If we have difficulty enrolling a sufficient number of patients to conduct our clinical trials as planned, we may need to delay, limit or terminate ongoing or planned clinical trials, any of which would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If product liability lawsuits are brought against us, we may incur substantial liabilities andfinancial condition may be required to limit commercialization of our product candidates.materially adversely affected.

We face a potential risk of product liability as a result of the clinical testing of our product candidates and will face an even greater risk if we commercialize our product candidates. For example, we may be sued if any product we develop or any materials that we use in our products allegedly causes injury or is found to be otherwise unsuitable during product testing, manufacturing, marketing or sale. Any such product liability claims may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability and a breach of warranties. Claims could also be asserted under state consumer protection acts. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit commercialization of our product candidates. Even a successful defense would require significant financial and management resources. Regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

decreased demand for our product candidates;
injury to our reputation;
withdrawal of clinical trial participants;
costs to defend the related litigation;
a diversion of management’s time and its resources;
substantial monetary awards to trial participants or patients;
product recalls, withdrawals or labeling, marketing or promotional restrictions;
the inability to commercialize our product candidates; and
a decline in the value of the common stock.

Any inability to obtain and retain sufficient product liability insurance at an acceptable cost to protect against potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit the commercialization of products we develop. We intend to obtain product liability insurance covering our clinical trials. Although we will maintain such insurance, any claim that may be brought against us could result in a court judgment or settlement in an amount that is not covered, in whole or in part, by our insurance or that is in excess of the limits of our insurance coverage. Our insurance policies also have various exclusions, and we may be subject to a product liability claim for which we have no coverage. We may have to pay any amounts awarded by a court or negotiated in a settlement that exceed its coverage limitations or that are not covered by its insurance, and we may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient capital to pay such amounts.

Our current or future product candidates may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties when used alone or in combination with other approved products or investigational new drugs that could halt their clinical development, prevent their marketing approval, limit their commercial potential or result in significant negative consequences.

Undesirable or clinically unmanageable side effects could occur and cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of marketing approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Results of our trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of side effects or unexpected characteristics.

If unacceptable side effects arise in the development of our product candidates, we, the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, IRBs, or independent ethics committees at the institutions in which our studies are conducted, or the Data Safety Monitoring Board, or DSMB, could suspend or terminate our clinical trials or the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could order us to cease clinical trials or deny approval of our product candidates for any or all targeted indications. Treatment-related side effects could also affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled subjects to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims. In addition, these side effects may not be appropriately recognized or managed by the treating medical staff. We may be required to train medical personnel using our product candidates to understand the side effect profiles for our clinical trials and upon any commercialization of any of our product candidates. Inadequate training in recognizing or managing the potential side effects of our product candidates could result in patient injury or death. Any of these occurrences may prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the affected product candidate and may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly.

Moreover, clinical trials of our product candidates are conducted in carefully defined sets of patients who have agreed to enter into clinical trials. Consequently, it is possible that our clinical trials may indicate an apparent positive effect of a product candidate that is greater than the actual positive effect, if any, or alternatively fail to identify undesirable side effects. If, following approval of a product candidate, we, or others, discover that the product is less effective than previously believed or causes undesirable side effects that were not previously identified, any of the following consequences could occur:

regulatory authorities may withdraw their approval of the product or seize the product;
we, or any collaborators, may need to recall the product, or be required to change the way the product is administered or conduct additional clinical trials;
additional restrictions may be imposed on the marketing of, or the manufacturing processes for, the  product;
we may be subject to fines, injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties;
regulatory authorities may require the addition of labeling statements, such as a boxed warning or a contraindication;
we, or any collaborators, may be required to create a medication guide outlining the risks of the previously unidentified side effects for distribution to patients;
we, or any collaborators, could be sued and held liable for harm caused to patients;
the product may become less competitive; and
our reputation may suffer.

Risks Related to New, Cutting Edge Technologies

Because our gene-editing and cell therapy product candidates that may be developed using our mRNA technology platform are based on novel technologies, we cannot assure that wesuch products will be successful, or predict the related cost and time we will spend, in initiating, conducting and completing clinical development, and obtaining the necessary regulatory and reimbursement approvals, required for commercialization.successful.
 
Cellular immunotherapies, stem cell therapies, gene-edited, and iPSC-derived cell therapiesproduct candidates represent relatively new therapeutic areas, and the FDA has cautioned consumers about potential safety risks associated with them. To date, there are relatively few approved cell therapies. As a result, the regulatory approval process for a gene-editing or cellular therapy product candidates areis uncertain and may be more expensive and take longer than the approval process for product candidates based on other, better known or more extensively studied technologies and therapeutic approaches. For example, there are no new FDA approved products with a label designation that supports the use of a product to treat and reduce the severity of ARDS in patients with COVID-19, which makes it difficult to determine the clinical endpoints and data required to support an application or regulatory approval, and the time and cost required to obtain regulatory approval in the United States for our product candidate.
 
Cell reprogramming technology and related cell therapy products using allogenic MSCs derived from iPSCsiPSC lines represent novel therapeutic approaches, and to our knowledge no iPSC-derived cell products are currently approved for commercial sale anywhere in the world. As such, it is difficult to accurately predict the type and scope of challenges that we will incur during developmentpotential strategic partners may confront in developing and advancing a pipeline of iPSC-derived therapeutic products. We and our respective product candidates. Westrategic partners thus face uncertainties associated with the preclinical and clinical development, manufacture, and regulatory compliance for the initiation and conduct of clinical trials, regulatory approval, and reimbursement required for successful commercialization of future product candidates. In addition, becauseFurther, the iPSC-derived cell product candidates are in the pre-clinical stage, no human data are yet available to assess the effects of treatment. Animal modelsprocesses and assays may not accurately predict the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in our target patient populations, and appropriate models and assays may need to be developed for demonstrating the safety, efficacy and purity of the product candidates, as requiredrequirements imposed by the FDA andor other applicable regulatory authorities may cause delays and additional costs in obtaining approvals for ongoing clinicalmarketing authorization for any future product candidates. Because our platform is novel, and cell- and gene-based therapies are relatively new, regulatory agencies may lack experience in evaluating product candidates using our mRNA technology platform. This novelty may lengthen the regulatory review process, including the time it takes for the FDA to review IND applications if and when such applications are submitted, increase development costs, and regulatory approval.delay or prevent commercialization of future products, if such products are approved for marketing.
 
RegulatoryDue to the rapid advancements in cellular and genetic technologies, regulatory processes and requirements in the United States and in other jurisdictions governing cellcellular and gene therapy products have changed frequentlyare evolving and the FDA or other regulatory bodies may change the requirements, or identify different regulatory pathways, for the clinical testing and approval of these product candidates. For example, withinin recent years the FDA has issued several new guidance documents related to developing and manufacturing cellular and gene therapy products. In addition, adverse developments in clinical trials of cellular gene therapy products conducted by others, or in treated patients after such products are commercialized, may cause the CenterFDA or other oversight bodies to change the requirements for Biologics Evaluationapproval of any of our strategic partners’ product candidates. For example, in November 2023, the FDA announced that it was investigating reports of T-cell malignancy in patients following their treatment with BCMA-directed or CD19-directed autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapies, although more recent public statements by agency leadership indicate that the benefits of such treatments are expected to still outweigh those risks. Future adverse events or safety issues could lead to more significant regulatory action applicable to either a specific product or a broader product class, based on case-by-case science-based benefit-risk assessments. Similarly, the EMA oversees the development of cellular and Research, CBER, restructuredgene therapies in the EU and created amay issue new Office of Tissuesguidelines concerning the development and Advanced Therapies, OTAT, to better align its oversight activities with FDA Centersmarketing authorization for Drugs and Medical Devices. It is possible that over time new or different divisions may be established or be granted the authority for regulating cell and/cellular or gene therapy products including iPSC-derived cell products. As a result,and require that we comply with these new guidelines. These regulatory agencies and committees and any new regulations, requirements or guidelines they promulgate may lengthen the regulatory review process, which may reduce the anticipated benefits of our strategic partnerships or adversely affect the commercialization of any future therapeutic products they may develop.
Accordingly, our strategic partners may be required to change regulatory strategies or to modify applications for clinical investigations or regulatory approval, which could delay and impair ourtheir ability to complete the pre-clinicalpreclinical and clinical development and manufacture of, and obtain regulatory approval for, ourtheir product candidates. Changes in regulatory authorities and advisory groups, or any new regulations, requirements or guidelines they promulgate, may lengthen the regulatory review process, require us to perform additional studies, increase development and manufacturing costs, lead to changes in regulatory pathways, positions and interpretations, delay or prevent approval and commercialization of the product candidates developed through our strategic partners or lead to significant post-approval limitations or restrictions. As we advance our product candidates, we will be required to consult withrestrictions that may reduce the FDA and other regulatory authorities, and our product candidates will likely be reviewed by an FDA advisory committee. We also must comply with applicable requirements, and if we fail to do so, we may be required to delay or discontinue developmentanticipated benefits of our product candidates. Delays or unexpected costs in obtaining, or the failure to obtain, the regulatory approval necessary to bring the product candidates to market could impair our ability to generate sufficient product revenues to maintain our respective businesses.strategic partnerships.
 
The pre-clinical and clinical development, manufacture, and regulatory requirements for approval of the product candidates may be more expensive and take longer than for other more well-known or extensively studied pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical product candidates, due to a lack of prior experiences on the side of both developers and regulatory agencies. Additionally,  we may be required to modify or change pre-clinical and clinical development plans or manufacturing activities and plans or be required to meet stricter regulatory requirements for approval. Any such modifications or changes could delay or prevent our ability to develop, manufacture, obtain regulatory approval or commercialize the product candidates, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Gene editing product candidates we may develop based on our license agreements with Factor and Novellus are based on new technology, which makes it difficult to predict the time and cost of development and of subsequently obtaining regulatory approval, if we are able to obtain such approval.

Gene editing product candidates we may develop based on our license agreements with Factor and Novellus are based on new technology, which makes it difficult to predict the time and cost of development and of subsequently obtaining regulatory approval, if we are able to obtain such approval. GeneLikewise, gene editing technology is relatively new, and no products based onwith the first cell-based gene therapy product incorporating such technology havehaving been approved by the FDA in the U.S. or the E.U. to date, andDecember 2023. In addition, only a limited number of clinical trials of product candidates based on gene-editing technologies have been commenced. As such, itIt is therefore difficult to accurately predict the developmental challenges we may incur if we exclusively license the technology from Factor, as we proceed through product discovery or identification, preclinical studies and clinical trials.pursuing our business strategy. There may be long-term effects from treatment with any such product candidates that weour strategic partners may develop that we cannot predict at this time. Any such product candidates we may develop may interact with genetic material (RNA/DNA) and because animal genetic materials differ from human genetic material, past testing of any such product candidates in animal models may not be predictive of results in human clinical trials fordesigned to demonstrate safety or efficacy. As a result of these factors, it is more difficult to predict the time and cost of such product candidate development, and we cannot predict whether the application of gene editing technology, or other similar or competitive gene editing technologies, will result in the identification, development andor regulatory approval of any products. There can be no assurance that any development problems we may experience related to such gene editing technology or any of our research programs that use such technology will not cause significant delays or anticipated costs, or that such development problems can be solved. Any of these factors may prevent us from completing preclinical studies or clinical trials based on such technology or from commercializing any such product candidates on a timely or profitable basis, if at all.
 
The clinical trial requirements of the FDA, the EMA and other regulatory authorities and the criteria these regulators use to determine the safety and efficacy of a product candidate vary substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use and market of the product candidate. NoDue to the novelty and complexity of gene-edited cellular products, based on gene-editing technologies have been approved by regulators to date. As a result, the regulatory approval process for such product candidates using such technology is uncertain and may be more expensive and take longer than the approval process for product candidates based on other, better known or more extensively studied technologies. It is difficult to determine how long it will take or how much it will cost to obtain regulatory approvals for product candidates using this technology in either the United States or the E.U. or how long it will take to commercialize any product candidates. Delay or failure to obtain, or unexpected costs in obtaining, the regulatory approval necessary to bring a potential product candidate to market could decrease our ability to generate sufficient product revenue, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be harmed.

Regulatory requirements
We face intense competition and rapid technological change and the possibility that our competitors may develop therapies that are more advanced, safer, or more effective than any therapy we develop in the future, which may adversely affect our financial condition.
We are engaged in the development of gene therapies, which is a competitive and rapidly changing field. We have competitors both in the United States and ininternationally, including major multinational pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, universities, and other jurisdictions governing gene therapy productsresearch institutions. Many of our competitors have changed frequentlysubstantially greater financial, technical, research and human resources than we do, and may continue to changealso have strategic partnerships and collaborative arrangements with leading companies and research institutions. Our competitors may succeed in developing, acquiring, or licensing on an exclusive basis, products that are more effective, safer, or less costly than any products that we may develop in the future. In January 2020, the FDA issued several new guidance documents on gene therapy products. The FDA established the Office of Tissuesfuture, or achieve patent protection, marketing approval, product commercialization, and Advanced Therapies within its Center for Biologics Evaluationmarket penetration earlier than us. Additionally, technologies developed by our competitors may render any product candidates we are seeking to develop uneconomical or obsolete. For additional information regarding our competition, see “Part I, Item 1. Business—Competition”.
Negative public opinion and Research to consolidate the reviewincreased regulatory scrutiny of gene therapy and relatedgenetic research may damage public perception of our future product candidates or adversely affect our ability to conduct our business or obtain and maintain marketing approvals for our future product candidates.
Public perception may be influenced by claims that gene therapy, including gene editing technologies, is unsafe or unethical, and research activities and adverse events in the field, even if not ultimately attributable to us or our future product candidates, could result in increased governmental regulation, unfavorable public perception, challenges in recruiting patients to participate in future clinical studies involving product candidates using our mRNA technology platform, potential regulatory delays in the testing or approval of product candidates using our mRNA technology platform, labeling restrictions for any future approved products, and establisheda decrease in demand for any such product. More restrictive government regulations or negative public opinion would have a negative effect on our business or financial condition and may delay or impair the Cellular, Tissuedevelopment and Gene Therapies Advisory Committeecommercialization of future product candidates using our mRNA technology platform or demand for any approved products.
The manufacture of biotechnology products is complex, and manufacturers often encounter difficulties in production.
The manufacture of biotechnology products, including cellular and gene therapy products, is generally complex and requires significant expertise and capital investment. Manufacturers for any product candidates developed using our mRNA technology platform will be required to advisecomply with cGMP regulations and guidelines for clinical trial product manufacture and subsequently for commercial product manufacture. Manufacturers of biotechnology products often encounter difficulties in production, particularly in scaling up, addressing product quality, product comparability, validating production processes and mitigating potential sources of contamination. These problems include difficulties with raw material procurement, production costs and yields, quality control, product quality, including stability of the product, quality assurance testing, operator error, shortages of qualified personnel, as well as compliance with strictly enforced federal, state and foreign regulations. Any delay or interruption in the supply of preclinical study supplies (or clinical trial supplies in the future) could delay the completion of such studies, increase the costs associated with the affected development programs and, depending upon the period of delay, require new studies to be commenced at additional expense or terminated completely.
Risks Related to Ownership of our Common Stock
Six stockholders collectively own a significant percentage of our outstanding common stock, and as a result of such ownership, such stockholders may influence the election of directors and other matters submitted to stockholders.
According to their most recent Schedule 13G filings and/or our corporate records, six stockholders—Charles Cherington, Nicholas Singer, John D. Halpern, George P. Denny III, Freebird Partners LP and IAF, LLC—collectively own approximately 43% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Although, to our knowledge, such stockholders are not a “group” or “acting in concert,” they have and are expected to continue to have, individually and/or collectively, the ability to influence the election of our board of directors and the outcome of other matters submitted to our stockholders. In addition, each of those stockholders own note warrants and convertible notes, which if exercised and/or converted would increase their ownership percentage of our outstanding common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the note warrants and convertible notes, the number of shares of common stock that may be acquired by a particular holder upon exercise of the note warrants and/or conversion of the convertible notes is limited, to the extent necessary, to ensure that following such exercise and/or conversion, the number of shares of common stock then beneficially owned by the holder and any other persons or entities whose beneficial ownership of common stock would be attributed to the holder for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act does not exceed 9.99% (for Messrs. Singer and Halpern and IAF, LLC) or 19.99% (for Messrs. Cherington and Denny and Freebird Partners LLP) of the total number of shares of our common stock then outstanding. The interests of these stockholders may not always coincide with our interests or the interests of other stockholders, and such stockholders, individually or collectively, may act in a manner that advances their best interests and not necessarily those of other stockholders. One consequence to this review. substantial influence is that it may be difficult for investors to remove our management and it could also deter unsolicited takeovers, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices.
The sale of our common stock to Lincoln Park Capital Fund LLC (“Lincoln Park”) may cause dilution to our other stockholders and the subsequent sale of the shares of common stock acquired by Lincoln Park, or the perception that such sales may occur, could cause the price of our common stock to fall.
Lincoln Park committed to purchase up to $10.0 million of our common stock under a standby equity purchase agreement (“SEPA”). Through December 31, 2023, we have issued and sold approximately 214,000 shares of our common stock to Lincoln Park for approximately $0.3 million in gross proceeds under the SEPA, leaving an approximately $9.7 million balance of the $10.0 million total commitment. The purchase price for the shares that we may sell to Lincoln Park under the SEPA is subject to a pricing formula in the SEPA and will vary based on the price of our common stock at the time we initiate the sale. Depending on market liquidity at the time, sales of such shares may cause the trading price of our common stock to fall.
We generally have the right to control the timing and amount of any future sales of our shares to Lincoln Park under the SEPA. Sales of shares of our common stock to Lincoln Park under the SEPA, if any, will depend upon market conditions and other factors to be determined by us. We may ultimately decide to sell to Lincoln Park all, some or none of the shares of our common stock that may be available for us to sell pursuant to the SEPA. If and when we do sell shares to Lincoln Park, after Lincoln Park has acquired the shares, Lincoln Park may resell all, some or none of those shares at any time or from time to time in its discretion. Therefore, sales to Lincoln Park by us could result in substantial dilution to the interests of other holders of our common stock. Additionally, the sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock to Lincoln Park, or the anticipation of such sales, could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and at a price that we might otherwise wish to effect sales.
There may be future sales or other dilution of our equity, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
We are generally not restricted from issuing additional common stock, including any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock. To raise additional capital, we may in the future sell additional shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock at prices that are lower than the prices paid by existing stockholders, and investors purchasing shares or other securities in the future could have rights superior to existing stockholders, which could result in substantial dilution to the interests of existing stockholders. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of common stock or securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock or the perception that such sales could occur.
In addition, under the terms of the asset purchase agreement pursuant to which we acquired assets from Exacis Biotherapeutics Inc. (“Exacis”), we agreed to issue to Exacis shares of our common stock as contingent consideration. If our market capitalization equals or exceeds $100.0 million during the three-year period commencing on April 26, 2023 and ending on the three-year anniversary thereof, the number of shares of common stock we would issue is determined by a formula specified in the asset purchase agreement. In addition, if our market capitalization equals or exceeds $200.0 million during the same three-year period, we agreed to issue to Exacis additional shares of our common stock determined by a formula specified in the asset purchase agreement. See Note 4 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information.
In addition to the government regulators,shares that may be sold to Lincoln Park under the IBCSEPA, a large number of shares may be issued and IRBsubsequently sold upon the exercise of each institution at which we conduct clinical trialsoutstanding options and warrants and upon the conversion of our product candidates, or a central IRB if appropriate, would need to review the proposed clinical trial to assess the safetyoutstanding convertible notes.
As of March 12, 2024, there were approximately 5.4 million shares of our common stock outstanding. In addition, adverse developmentsthere were approximately 2.2 million shares of common stock issuable under outstanding options with a weighted average exercise price of $9.29 per share, 20.4 million shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants with a weighted average exercise price of $2.05 per share, 3.1 million shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of our outstanding July 2023 convertible notes (assuming all principal and accrued interest is converted at a conversion rate of $2.86 per share) and 4.8 million shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of our outstanding December 2023 convertible notes (assuming all principal and accrued interest is converted at a conversion rate of $1.9194 per share). To the extent that holders of such securities sell the shares of common stock issued upon the exercise or conversion of such securities, the market price of our common stock may decrease due to the additional selling pressure in clinical trialsthe market. In addition to the risk of gene therapy products conducted by othersdilution from the sale of shares of our common stock to Lincoln Park described above, the risk of dilution from issuances of shares of common stock underlying outstanding securities and/or to Exacis described above may cause stockholders to sell their common stock, which could further decline in the FDA or other oversight bodies to change the requirements for approval of anymarket price.

The terms of our product candidates. Similarly, the EMA governs the developmentconvertible notes could limit our growth and our ability to finance our operations, fund our capital needs, respond to changing conditions and engage in other business activities that may be in our best interests.
Our convertible notes contain a number of gene therapies in the EUrestrictive covenants that, among other things, generally limit our ability to create liens, pay dividends, acquire shares of capital stock and may issue new guidelines concerning the development and marketing authorization for gene therapy products and require that wemake payments on subordinated debt, incur indebtedness, or enter into transactions with affiliates. Our ability to comply with these new guidelines.covenants may be adversely affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we can comply with these covenants. The financial covenants could limit our ability to make needed expenditures or otherwise conduct necessary or desirable business activities.
The requirement that we redeem our convertible notes in cash could adversely affect our business plan, liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.
If not converted, we are required to redeem some or all of the principal of our convertible notes for cash under certain circumstances. These regulatory review agencies and committeesobligations could have important consequences on our business. In particular, they could:
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our businesses and the new requirementsindustries in which we operate;
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; and
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors.

No assurances can be given that we will be successful in making the required payments to the holders of our convertible notes or guidelines they promulgatethat we will be able to comply with the financial or other covenants in our convertible notes. If we are unable to make the required cash payments or otherwise comply with the covenants in our convertible notes:

the holders of our convertible notes may lengthen the regulatory review process, require us to perform additional studiesrepurchase some or trials, increaseall of their convertible notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest;
the holders of our development costs, leadconvertible notes could foreclose against our assets; and/or
we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation.
Our failure to changesmeet the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq could result in regulatory positionsa delisting of our common stock.
Our common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market. The Nasdaq Capital Market requires that listed companies satisfy continued listing requirements, one of which that listed companies have: (x) stockholders' equity of at least $2.5 million; (y) a market value of listed securities of at least $35 million; or (z) net income from continuing operations of $500,000 in the company’s most recently completed fiscal year or in two of the three most recently completed fiscal years. Our stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2023 was approximately $2.2 million and interpretations, delaywe do not currently meet either of the two alternative compliance standards described in clause (y) and (z). Accordingly, we expect to receive a notice from Nasdaq informing us that we do not meet the foregoing continued listing requirements. If we receive such a notice, we expect to be afforded 45 days to submit a plan to regain compliance with the stockholders’ equity requirement for Nasdaq’s consideration, and if the plan is accepted, to be granted an extension period of up to 180 calendar days from the date of the deficiency notice to regain compliance. If the plan is not accepted or prevent approval and commercialization of any product candidates we may develop if we exercise our option agreements with Novellus or leadare unable to significant post-approval limitations or restrictions. As we advanceregain compliance within any such product candidates, we willextension period granted by Nasdaq, Nasdaq would be required to consult with these regulatory agenciesissue a delisting determination, which we expect we would be entitled to request a hearing before a Nasdaq Hearings Panel to present a plan to regain compliance and committees and comply with applicable requirements and guidelines. to request a further extension period to regain compliance.
If we fail to do so,satisfy any of the Nasdaq continued listing requirements, Nasdaq may take steps to delist our common stock. In the event of a delisting, we can provide no assurance that any action taken by us to restore compliance with Nasdaq continued listing requirements would be successful.
If our common stock is ultimately delisted by Nasdaq, and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, then we could face significant material adverse consequences, including: a material reduction in the liquidity of our common stock and a corresponding material reduction in the trading price of our common stock; a more limited market quotations for our securities; a determination that our common stock is a “penny stock” that requires brokers to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly resulting in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our securities; more limited research coverage by stock analysts; loss of reputation; more difficult and more expensive equity financings in the future; the potential loss of confidence by investors; and fewer business development opportunities.
The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.” If our common stock remains listed on Nasdaq, our common stock will be covered securities. Although the states are preempted from regulating the sale of our securities, the federal statute does allow the states to investigate companies if there is a suspicion of fraud, and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate or bar the sale of covered securities in a particular case. If our securities were no longer listed on Nasdaq and therefore not “covered securities,” we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities.
Anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law and provisions in our charter and bylaws could make a third-party acquisition of us difficult.

Because we are a Delaware corporation, the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us, even if the change in control would be beneficial to stockholders. We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware, which prohibits us from engaging in certain business combinations, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. In addition, our restated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws also contain certain provisions that may make a third-party acquisition of us difficult, including the ability of our board of directors to issue preferred stock and the inability of our stockholders to call a special meeting or act by written consent.

Risks Related to our Financial Position and Capital Requirements

We may acquire businesses, assets or products, or form strategic alliances, in the future, and we may be required to delay or discontinue developmentnot realize the benefits of such product candidates. Theseacquisitions.

We may acquire additional processesbusinesses, assets or products, form strategic alliances or create joint ventures with third parties that we believe will complement or augment our existing business. If we acquire businesses with promising intellectual property, markets or technologies, we may resultnot be able to realize the benefit of acquiring such businesses if we are unable to successfully integrate them with our existing operations and company culture. We may encounter numerous difficulties in developing, manufacturing and marketing any new acquisition. Difficulties may prevent us from realizing its expected benefits or enhancing our business. We cannot assure you that, following any such acquisition, we will achieve the expected synergies to justify the transaction.

Our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards may be subject to limitations.

Our ability to use our federal and state net operating losses (“NOLs”) to offset potential future taxable income and related income taxes that would otherwise be due is dependent upon our generation of future taxable income, and we cannot predict with certainty when, or whether, we will generate sufficient taxable income to use all of our NOLs.

Under Section 382 and Section 383 of the Code and corresponding provisions of state law, if a reviewcorporation undergoes an “ownership change,” its ability to use its pre-change NOL carryforwards and approval process thatother pre-change tax attributes (such as research tax credits) to offset its post-change income may be limited. A Section 382 “ownership change” is longer than we otherwise would have expected. Delaysgenerally defined as a resultgreater than 50 percentage point change (by value) in its equity ownership by certain stockholders over a three-year period. Even if we achieve profitability, we may not be able to utilize a material portion of an increased or lengthierour NOL carryforwards and other tax attributes, which could have a material adverse effect on cash flow and results of operations. Similar provisions of state tax law may also apply to limit our use of accumulated state tax attributes. There is also a risk that due to regulatory approval process or further restrictionschanges, such as suspensions on the developmentuse of NOLs, or other unforeseen reasons, our product candidates canexisting NOLs could expire or otherwise be costly and could negatively impact our or our collaborators’ abilityunavailable to complete clinical trials and commercialize our current andoffset future product candidates in a timely manner, if at all.income tax liabilities.

Risks Related to Regulatory Requirements

We are subject to extensive and costly government regulation.

Product candidates employing medical technology are subject to extensive and rigorous domestic government regulation including regulation by the FDA, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, other divisions of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Department of Justice, state and local governments, and their respective foreign equivalents. If products employing our technologies are marketed abroad, they will also be subject to extensive regulation by foreign governments, whether or not they have obtained FDA approval for a given product and itsone or more uses. Such foreign regulation may be equally or more demanding than corresponding United States regulation.

Government regulation substantially increases the cost and risk of researching, developing, manufacturing, and selling ourmedical products. Even if we or our strategic partners are able to obtain regulatory approval for a particular product candidate, the approval may limit the indicated medical uses for the product, may otherwise limit ourthe ability to promote, sell, and distribute the product, may require that we conduct costly post-marketing surveillance, and/or may require that we conduct ongoing post-marketing studies. Material changes to an approved product, such as, for example, manufacturing changes or revised labeling, may require further regulatory review and approval. Once obtained, any approvals may be withdrawn, including, for example, if there is a later discovery of previously unknown problems with the product, such as a previously unknown safety issue.

In addition, regulatory agencies may not approve the labeling claims that are necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of oura product candidates.candidate. For example, regulatory agencies may approve a product candidate for fewer or more limited indications than requested or may grant approval subject to the performance of post-marketing studies. Regulators may approve a product candidate for a smaller patient population, a different drug formulation or a different manufacturing process, than we or our strategic partners are seeking.

The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities are lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable. If weour potential strategic partners are ultimately unable to obtain necessary regulatory approvals, or more limited regulatory approvals than we expect, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.

Moreover, principal investigatorsapproval for our clinical trials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to us from time to time and receive compensation in connection with such services. Under certain circumstances,their product candidates, we may be requiredunable to report some of these relationships to the FDA or other regulatory authority. The FDA or other regulatory authority may conclude that a financial relationship between usproduct revenue and a principal investigator has created a conflict of interest or otherwise affected interpretation of the study. The FDA or other regulatory authority may therefore question the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site and the utility of the clinical trial itself mayour business will be jeopardized. This could result in a delay in approval, or rejection, of our marketing applications by the FDA or other regulatory authority, as the case may be, and may ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval of one or more of our product candidates.substantially harmed.

Changes in marketing approval policies during the development period, changes in or the enactment or promulgation of additional statutes, regulations or guidance or changes in regulatory review for each submitted product application, may cause delays in the approval or rejection of an application.

Regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or may decide that our data are insufficient for approval and require additional preclinical, clinical or other studies. Varying interpretations of the data obtained from preclinical and clinical testing could delay, limit or prevent marketing approval of a product candidate. We cannot commercialize a product until the appropriate regulatory authorities have reviewed and approved the product candidate. Even if ourThe time required to obtain approval by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities is unpredictable, typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical studies and depends upon numerous factors, including the type, complexity, and novelty of the product candidates demonstrate safetyinvolved. Regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and efficacy inmay refuse to accept an application for review, or may decide that our data are insufficient for approval and require additional non-clinical, clinical trials, the regulatory agenciesor other studies.

We may not complete their review processes in a timely manner, or we may notnever be able to obtain regulatory approval. Additional approval for any product candidates that we develop in the future. If our future product candidates are ultimately not approved for any reason, our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.

In addition, even once clinical development of a future product candidate is initiated, such clinical studies may not start or be completed on schedule, if at all. The completion or commencement of clinical studies can be delayed or prevented for a number of reasons, including, among others:

the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not authorize us or our future clinical investigators to commence planned clinical studies, or require that we suspend ongoing clinical studies through imposition of clinical holds;

negative results from our ongoing studies or other industry studies involving engineered or gene-edited cell therapy product candidates;
delays in reaching or failing to reach agreement on acceptable terms with prospective clinical research organizations (“CROs”) and clinical study sites, the terms of which can be subject to considerable negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and study sites;
inadequate quantity or quality of a product candidate or other materials necessary to conduct clinical studies, for example delays in the manufacturing of sufficient supply of finished drug product;
difficulties obtaining ethics committee or IRB, approval to conduct a clinical study at a prospective site or sites;
challenges in recruiting and enrolling subjects to participate in clinical studies, the proximity of subjects to study sites, eligibility criteria for the clinical study, the nature of the clinical study protocol, the availability of approved effective treatments for the relevant disease and competition from other clinical study programs for similar indications;
severe or unexpected drug-related side effects experienced by subjects in a clinical study, such as severe neurotoxicity and cytokine release syndrome;
the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with a proposed clinical study design, implementation of clinical trials or our interpretation of data from clinical studies, or may change the requirements for approval even after it has reviewed and commented on the design for our clinical studies;
reports from non-clinical or clinical testing of other competing candidates that raise safety or efficacy concerns; and
difficulties retaining subjects who have enrolled in a clinical study but may be prone to withdraw due to rigors of the clinical studies, lack of efficacy, side effects, personal issues, or loss of interest.

Changes in regulatory requirements, agency guidance or unanticipated events during our non-clinical studies and future clinical studies of our future product candidates may occur, which may result if anin changes to non-clinical or clinical study protocols or additional non-clinical or clinical study requirements, which could result in increased costs to us and could delay our projected development timeline.

Changes in regulatory requirements or FDA Advisory Committeeor EMA guidance, or unanticipated events during our non-clinical studies and future clinical studies, may force us to amend non-clinical studies and future clinical study protocols. The FDA, EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may also impose additional non-clinical studies and clinical study requirements. Amendments to protocols for or other regulatory authority recommends non-approvalaspects of our non-clinical studies may increase the cost or restrictions on approval. In addition,delay the timing or successful completion of those studies. If we may experience delays completing, or rejections based uponif we terminate, any of our non-clinical or future clinical studies, or if we are required to conduct additional government regulation fromnon-clinical or clinical studies, the commercial prospects for our future legislationproduct candidates may be harmed and our ability to recognize product revenue will be delayed.

The results of non-clinical studies and early-stage clinical trials of our future therapeutic candidates may not be predictive of the results of later stage clinical trials.

Success in non-clinical studies and early clinical trials does not ensure that later and pivotal clinical trials will generate the same results, or administrative action,otherwise provide adequate data to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a therapeutic candidate. Frequently, therapeutic candidates that have shown promising results in non-clinical studies or changesearly clinical trials have subsequently suffered significant setbacks in regulatory agency policy duringlater clinical trials. There can be no assurance that any of our non-clinical and preclinical programs will ultimately be successful or support initiating clinical development of any of our future therapeutic candidates. A number of companies in the period of productpharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in clinical development even after achieving promising results in earlier non-clinical studies or clinical trials, and any such setbacks in our development pipeline could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies caused by funding shortages or other events or conditions outside of their control could negatively impact our business.

The ability of the FDA to review process. Any marketing approval we ultimately obtainand approve INDs, proposed clinical trial protocols, or new product candidates can be affected by a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, government budget and funding levels, ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, statutory, regulatory, and policy changes, and other events that may be limited orotherwise affect the FDA’s ability to perform routine functions. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities, is subject to restrictions or post-approval commitments that render the approved product commercially unviable.political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

SecuringDisruptions at the FDA and other regulatory agencies may also slow the time necessary for new product candidates to be reviewed or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, have had to furlough critical employees and stop critical activities. In addition, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA’s inspectional activities were interrupted and restarted on a risk-based basis, which had the effect of delaying review and potential approval of product candidate marketing approval also requiresapplications.

If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns prevent the submission of information about the product manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing facilities by, the regulatory authorities. The FDA or other regulatory authorities may determine that our product candidates are not safe and effective, only moderately effective or have undesirable or unintended side effects, toxicitiesfrom conducting their regular inspections, reviews, or other characteristics that precluderegulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our obtaining marketing approval or prevent or limit commercial use. Any marketing approval we ultimatelyfuture regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, future government shutdowns could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain may be limited or subjectnecessary capital in order to restrictions or post-approval commitments that render the approved product not commercially viable.properly capitalize and continue our operations.

If we fail todo not comply with environmental,laws regulating the protection of the environment and health and human safety, our business could be adversely affected.

We maintain quantities of various flammable and toxic chemicals in our facilities in Massachusetts that are used for our research and development activities. We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these hazardous materials. We believe our procedures for storing, handling and disposing these hazardous materials in our laboratory facilities comply with the relevant guidelines of the relevant local, state, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the U.S. Department of Labor. Although we believe that our safety procedures for handling and disposing of these materials comply with the standards mandated by applicable regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials cannot be eliminated. If an accident occurs, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs thatbe held liable for resulting damages, which could harm our business.

be substantial. We are also subject to numerous environmental, health and workplace safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures, exposure to blood-borne pathogens and the handling use, storage, treatmentof animals and wastes generatedbiohazardous materials. Any insurance coverage we have may not be sufficient to cover these liabilities. Additional federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting our operations may be adopted in our manufacturing facility.the future. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from the use of hazardous materials, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, and the amount of the liability could exceed our resources. We could alsomay incur significantsubstantial costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties for failure to comply with, such laws and regulations.

If we, our collaborators,substantial fines or our contract manufacturing organizations fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements at any stage during the regulatory process, such noncompliance could result in, among other things delays in the approval of applications or supplements to approved applications; refusal of a regulatory authority, including the FDA, to review pending market approval applications or supplements to approved applications; warning letters; fines; import and/or export restrictions; product recalls or seizures; injunctions; total or partial suspension of production; civil penalties; withdrawals of previously approved marketing applications or licenses; recommendations by the FDA or other regulatory authorities against governmental contracts; and/or criminal prosecutions.

Any fast-track designation or grant of priority review status by the FDA may not actually lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process, nor will it assure FDA approval of our product candidates. Additionally, our product candidates may treat indications that do not qualify for priority review vouchers.

Our product candidate, IRX-2, has received fast track designation in head and neck cancers. If a drug or biologic is intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition and the drug or biologic demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for this condition, the drug or biologic sponsor may apply for FDA fast track designation. If a product candidate offers major advances in treatment, the FDA may designate it eligible for a priority review. The FDA has broad discretion to grant these designations, so evenpenalties if we believe a particular product candidate is eligible forviolate, any of these designations, we cannot assure you that the FDAlaws or regulations which would decide to grant them. We may also seek fast track designation for IRX-2 in the other indications or for future products we may seek to develop. Even if we are granted fast track designation or priority review, we may not experience a faster development process, review or approval compared to conventional FDA procedures. The FDA may also withdraw fast track designation if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from Brooklyn’s clinical development program.

Orphan Drug Designation and Fast Track Designation may not actually lead to a faster review process.

Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, the FDA has a goal of responding to NDAs or BLAs for new molecular entities within 10 months of the date that it is filed for standard review, but the timeframe is also often extended. We have in the past sought and we may in the future seek approval of IRX-2 or any other product candidate we may acquire or license under programs designed to accelerate the FDA’s review and approval of NDAs or BLAs. For example, fast track designation is a process designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of drugs and biologics to treat serious conditions that fill an unmet clinical need. The purpose is to get important new drugs and biologics to the patient earlier. Inadversely affect our case, IRX-2 has been granted fast track designation for the treatment of head and neck cancer. In the future, we may request fast track designation from the FDA for other diseases or for other products we may acquire or in-license, but we cannot assure that we will obtain such designations. Further, even if we obtain fast track designation, the designation does not guarantee FDA approval of any NDA or BLA that we file, that the development program or review timeline will ultimately be shorter than if we had not obtained the designations, or that the FDA will not request additional information, including requesting additional clinical studies (although potentially a post-marketing requirement), during its review. Any request for additional information or clinical data could delay the FDA’s timely review of any NDA or BLA that we submit.business.

Obtaining and maintaining marketing approval of our current and future product candidates in one jurisdiction does not mean that we will be successful in obtaining marketing approval of our current and future product candidates in other jurisdictions.

Obtaining and maintaining marketing approval of our current and future product candidates in one jurisdiction does not guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain marketing approval in any other jurisdiction, while a failure or delay in obtaining marketing approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative effect on the marketing approval process in others. For example, even if the FDA grants marketing approval of a product candidate, comparable regulatory authorities in foreign jurisdictions must also approve the manufacturing, marketing and promotion of the product candidate in those countries. Approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative review periods different from, and greater than, those in the United States, including additional preclinical studies or clinical trials as clinical studies conducted in one jurisdiction may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. In many jurisdictions outside the United States, a product candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that jurisdiction. In some cases, the price that we intend to charge for our products is also subject to approval. We do not have experience in obtaining reimbursement or pricing approvals in international markets. Further, pricing obtained in other jurisdictions may impact pricing realized in the United States and in other jurisdictions where the product is approved.

Obtaining marketing approvals and compliance with regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in certain countries outside of the United States. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international markets and/or receive applicable marketing approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our product candidates will be harmed.

Healthcare legislative reform measures and constraints on national budget social security systems may have a material and adverse effect on our business, andfinancial condition, results of operations.operations, and prospects.

Payors,
Third-party payors, whether domestic or foreign, or governmental or private,commercial, are developing increasingly sophisticated or complex methods of controlling healthcare costs and those methods are not always specifically adapted for new technologies such as those we are developing.costs. In both the United States and certain foreign jurisdictions, there have been, a number ofand likely will continue to be, legislative and regulatory changesproposals at the foreign, federal, and state levels directed at containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. We cannot predict the initiatives that may be adopted in the future. The continuing efforts of the government, insurance companies, managed care organizations, and other payors of healthcare services to contain or reduce costs of healthcare and/or impose price controls may adversely affect:

the health care system that could impact demand for our therapeutic candidates, if we obtain marketing approval;
our ability to sellreceive or set a price that we believe is fair for our products profitably. In particular,future products;
our ability to generate revenue and achieve or maintain profitability;
the level of taxes that we are required to pay; and
the availability of capital.

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 (“ACA”) includes measures that have significantly changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers in the United States,States. It also included the Affordable Care Act, among other things, subjects biologicprovisions that created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products to potential competition by lower-cost biosimilars; addresses a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implantedbiosimilar to or injected; increasesinterchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference biological product. The ACA continues to significantly impact the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by most manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program; extends the Medicaid Drug Rebate program to utilization of prescriptions of individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations; subjects manufacturers to new annual fees and taxes for certain branded prescription drugs; and provides incentives to programs that increase the federal government’s comparative effectiveness research.United States’s pharmaceutical industry.

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the Affordable Care Act was enacted. In August 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.5 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021, was unable to reach required goals, thereby triggering the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect in April 2013, and due to subsequent legislative amendments, including the BBA, will remain in effect through 2027 unless additional Congressional action is taken. The CARES Act, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, and the Act to Prevent Across-the-Board Direct Spending Cuts suspended the 2% sequestration mandated by the Budget Control Act of 2011 and the American Relief Act of 2011 through December 31, 2021. In December 2021, Congress extended the suspension of the automatic 2% reduction through March 2022 and reduced the sequestration adjustment to 1% beginning on April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022, with the full 2% reduction for sequestration resuming thereafter. In January 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, was signed into law, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. We cannot anticipate whether Congress will further extend the sequestration and when the sequestration reimbursement will return.

Also,Moreover, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny recently over the manner in which prescription drug and biological product manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which has resulted in several Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drug products. In August 2022, President Biden signed into the law the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”), which includes (among other things) multiple provisions that may impact the prices of drug products that are both sold into the Medicare program and throughout the United States. A manufacturer of drug products covered by Medicare Parts B or D must pay a rebate to the federal government if their drug product’s price increases faster than the rate of inflation. The IRA is in the process of being implemented by CMS and its impact on the pharmaceutical industry in the United States remains uncertain at this time, in part because multiple large pharmaceutical companies and other stakeholders (e.g., the U.S. Chamber of Commerce) have initiated federal lawsuits against CMS arguing a separate price negotiation program is unconstitutional for a variety of reasons, among other complaints. Those lawsuits are currently ongoing.

At the state level, legislatures have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. For example, in November 2018, CMS issuedrecent years, several states have formed prescription drug affordability boards (“PDABs”). These PDABs have attempted to implement upper payment limits on drugs sold in their respective states in both public and commercial health plans. For example, in August 2023, Colorado’s PDAB announced a proposed rule for commentlist of five prescription drugs that would among other things, provide Medicareundergo an affordability review. The effects of these efforts similarly remain uncertain pending the outcomes of several federal lawsuits challenging state authority to regulate prescription drug plans under Part D more transparency in pricing and greater flexibility to negotiate discounts for, and in certain circumstances exclude, drugs in the six “protected” formulary classes and allow Medicare Advantage plans to use certain drug management tools such as step therapy for physician-administered drugs. Although a number of these, and other proposed measures will require authorization through additional legislation to become effective, Congress and the Biden administration has each indicated that it will continue to seek new legislative and/or administrative measures to control drug costs.payment limits.

There have been, and likely will continue to be, legislative and regulatory proposals atWe expect that the foreign, federal and state levels directed at broadeningACA, the availability ofIRA, as well as other healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. We cannot predict the initiativesreform measures that may be adopted in the future. The continuing efforts of these governmentsfuture, may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other payors to contain or reduce costs of healthcare and/or imposefunding, more rigorous coverage criteria, lower reimbursement, and new payment methodologies. This could lower the price controls may adversely affect:

the demand for our product candidates, if we obtain regulatory approval;
our ability to set a price that we believe is fair for our products;
our ability to generate revenue and achieve or maintain profitability;
the level of taxes that we are required to pay; and
the availability of capital.

that we receive for any future approved therapeutic product. Any denial in coverage or reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or any other governmentgovernment-funded programs may result in a similar denial or reduction in payments from private payors, which may adversely affect our future profitability.

Risks Related to the Commercialization of Brooklyn’s Product Candidates

We may be unable to successfully scale up manufacturing of IRX-2 or newer gene editing or cellular products in sufficient quality and quantity, which may delay or prevent us from commercializing the product evenbeing able to generate sufficient revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize our future therapeutic candidates, if approved for marketing by the FDA or other regulatory agencies.approved.

In order to commercialize IRX -2 or any other product candidate we may acquire or in-license (including any products that may be developed from the licensed technology from Factor or via the Novellus acquisition), we will need to manufacture them in large quantities. We would need to scale up the manufacturing process to enable production of commercial quantities of IRX-2, likely at a qualified contract manufacturer, if approved, and we are currently exploring options for implementing scale-up activities in anticipation of study completion and submitting applications for marketing approval, if supported by study data. However, we may be unable to successfully increase manufacturing capability in a timely or cost-effective manner, or at all. In addition, quality issues may arise during scale-up activities.

Further, in order to release and demonstrate stability of product candidates for future commercial use, our analytical methods must be validated in accordance with regulatory guidelines. We may not be able to successfully validate or maintain validation of analytical methods during scale-up or demonstrate adequate purity, stability or comparability of the biological product candidates in a timely or cost-effective manner, or at all. Even if we believe our manufacturing processes meet all the regulatory manufacturing requirements, the FDA will review those processes and the manufacturing facility as part of the review of any future MA for IRX-2, if submitted after completion of the INSPIRE trial. If we are unable to successfully scale up the manufacture of IRX-2 in sufficient quality and quantity, or if we encounter validation issues, the development, testing, and clinical trials of future product candidates, may be delayed or infeasible,European Union, similar political, economic and regulatory approval or commercial launch of any resulting product, including IRX-2,developments may be delayed or may not be successfully achieved.

Even if we are ableaffect our ability to profitably commercialize any product candidate that we may develop, the product may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, third-party payor reimbursement practices or healthcare reform initiatives that could harm our business.

The commercial success of our current or any future product candidates will depend substantially, both domesticallyproducts. In addition to continuing pressure on prices and abroad,cost containment measures, legislative developments at the European Union or member state level may result in significant additional requirements or obstacles that may increase our operating costs. In international markets, reimbursement and healthcare payment systems vary significantly by country, and many countries have instituted price ceilings on the extent to which the costs of its product candidates will be paid by health maintenance, managed care, pharmacy benefitspecific products and similar healthcare management organizations, or reimbursed by government health administration authorities (such as Medicare and Medicaid), private health coverage insurers and other third-party payors. If reimbursement is not available, or is available only to limited levels, we maytherapies. Our future products, if any, might not be able to successfully commercialize our products. Even if coverage is provided, the approvedconsidered medically reasonable and necessary for a specific indication or cost-effective by third-party payors, an adequate level of reimbursement amount maymight not be high enough to allow us to establish and maintain pricing sufficient to realize a meaningful return on our investment.

There is significant uncertainty related to third-party payor coverage and reimbursement of newly approved drugs. Marketing approvals, pricing and reimbursementavailable for new drug products vary widely from country to country. Some countries require approval of the sale price of a drug before it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period begins after marketing or product licensing approval is granted. In some non-U.S. markets, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains subject to continuing governmental control even after initial approval is granted. As a result, we might obtain marketing approval for a product in a particular country, but then be subject to price regulations that delay commercial launch of the product, possibly for lengthy time periods, which may negatively impact the revenues it is able to generate from the sale of the product in that country. Adverse pricing limitations may hinder our ability to recoup our investment in one or more product candidates, even if our product candidates obtain marketing approval.

Our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidate will depend in part on the extent to which coverage and reimbursement for thesesuch products and related treatments will be available from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Government authorities and third-party payors, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations, decide which medications they will cover and establishpayors’ reimbursement levels. The healthcare industry is acutely focused on cost containment, both in the United States and elsewhere. Government authorities and third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications, which couldpolicies might adversely affect our ability to sell our product candidatesany future products profitably. These payors may not view our products, if any, as cost-effective, and coverage and reimbursement may not be available to our customers, or may not be sufficient to allow our products, if any, to be marketed on a competitive basis. Cost-control initiatives could cause us to decrease the price we might establish for products, which could result in lower than anticipated product revenues. If the prices for our products, if any, decrease or if governmental and other third-party payors do not provide adequate coverage or reimbursement, our prospects for revenue and profitability will suffer.

There may also be delays in obtaining coverage and reimbursementthe Consolidated Appropriations Act for newly approved2023, Congress provided FDA additional authorities related to the accelerated approval pathway for human drugs and coverage may be more limited than the indications for which the drug is approved by the FDA or comparable non-U.S. regulatory authorities. Moreover, eligibility for reimbursement does not imply that any drug will be paid for in all cases or at a rate that covers our costs, including research, development, manufacture, sale and distribution. Reimbursement rates may vary, by way of example, accordingbiologics. Under these recent amendments to the useFDCA, the agency may require a sponsor of a product granted accelerated approval to have a confirmatory trial underway prior to approval. The amendments also give FDA the option of using expedited procedures to withdraw product approval if the sponsor’s confirmatory trial fails to verify the claimed clinical benefits of the drug and the clinical setting in which it is used. Reimbursement rates may also be based on reimbursement levels already set for lower cost drugs or may be incorporated into existing payments for other services.

In addition, increasingly, third-party payors are requiring higher levels of evidence of the benefits and clinical outcomes of new technologies and are challenging the prices charged.product. We cannot be sure that coveragewhether additional legislative changes will be available for any product candidate that we may commercialize and, if available, thatenacted, or whether the reimbursement ratesFDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be adequate. Further,changed, or what the net reimbursementimpact of such changes on the marketing approvals of our therapeutic candidates, if any, may be. Increased scrutiny by the U.S. Congress of the FDA’s approval process may significantly delay or prevent marketing approval, as well as subject us to more stringent product labeling and post-approval testing and other requirements.

In addition, in April 2023 the European Commission issued a proposal that will revise and replace the existing general pharmaceutical legislation governing drug and biological products intended for the EU market. If adopted and implemented as currently proposed, these revisions will significantly change several aspects of drug products may be subject to additional reductions if there are changes to laws that presently restrict imports of drugs from countries where they may be sold at lower prices thandevelopment and approval in the United States. An inability to promptly obtain coverage and adequate payment rates from both government-funded and private payors for any of our product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, our ability to raise capital needed to commercialize products and our overall financial condition.

If we are unable to develop our sales, marketing and distribution capability on our own or through collaborations with marketing partners, we will not be successful in commercializing our product candidates.EU.

We currently have no marketing, salescannot predict the likelihood, nature or distribution capabilities and have limited salesextent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or marketing experience within our organization. If one or more of our product candidates is approved, we intendadministrative action, either to establish a sales and marketing organization with technical expertise and supporting distribution capabilities to commercialize that product candidate, or to outsource this function to a third party. There are risks involved with either establishing our own sales and marketing capabilities and entering into arrangements with third parties to perform these services.

Recruiting and training an internal commercial organization is expensive and time consuming and could delay any product launch. Some or all of these costs may be incurred in advance of any approval of any of our product candidates. If the commercial launch of a product candidate for which we recruit a sales force and establish marketing capabilities is delayed or does not occur for any reason, we would have prematurely or unnecessarily incurred these commercialization expenses. This may be costly and our investment would be lost if we cannot retain or reposition our sales and marketing personnel. In addition, we may not be able to hire a sales force in the United States or other target market that is sufficientabroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in sizeexisting requirements or has adequate expertise in the medical markets thatadoption of new requirements or policies, or if we intendare not able to target.

Factorsmaintain regulatory compliance, our therapeutic candidates may lose any marketing approval that may inhibit our efforts to commercialize our product candidates on our own include:

the inability to recruit, trainhave been obtained and retain adequate numbers of effective sales and marketing personnel;
the inability of sales personnel to obtain access to physicians or persuade adequate numbers of physicians to prescribe any future product that we may develop;
the lack of complementary treatments to be offered by sales personnel, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage relative to companies with more extensive product lines; and
unforeseen costs and expenses associated with creating an independent sales and marketing organization.

If we enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales, marketing and distribution services, our product revenue or the profitability to us from these revenue streams is likely to be lower than if we were to market and sell any product candidates that we develop ourselves. In addition, we may not be successful in entering into arrangements with third parties to sell and market our product candidatesachieve or may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us. We likely will have little control over such third parties and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our product candidates effectively. If we do not establish sales and marketing capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration with third parties, we may not be successful in commercializing our product candidates.

The market opportunities for any current or future product candidate we develop, if and when approved, may be limited to those patients who are ineligible for established therapies or for whom prior therapies have failed, and therefore may be small.

Cancer therapies are sometimes characterized as first-line, second-line, or third-line, and the FDA often approves new therapies initially only for third-line use. When cancer is detected early enough, first-line therapy, usually chemotherapy, hormone therapy, surgery, radiation therapy, immunotherapy or a combination of these, is sometimes adequate to cure the cancer or prolong life without a cure. Second- and third-line therapies are administered to patients when prior therapy is not effective. We may initially seek approval of IRX-2 and any other product candidates we develop as a therapy for patients who have received one or more prior treatments. Subsequently, for those products that prove to be sufficiently beneficial, if any, wesustain profitability, which would expect to seek approval potentially as a first-line therapy, but there is no guarantee that product candidates we develop, even if approved, would be approved for first-line therapy, and, prior to any such approvals, we may have to conduct additional clinical trials.

The number of patients who have the cancers we are targeting may turn out to be lower than we expect or may change as we develop the product candidate (e.g., lower rates of smoking around the globe may lead to lower incidence levels of head and neck cancer at the time of approval). Additionally, the potentially addressable patient population for our current programs or future product candidates, if and when approved, may be limited. Even if we obtain significant market share for any product candidate, if and when approved, if the potential target populations are small, we may never achieve profitability without obtaining marketing approval for additional indications, including use as first- or second-line therapy.

We face significant competition and if our competitors develop and market products that are more effective, safer or less expensive than the product candidates we develop, our commercial opportunities will be negatively impacted.

The life sciences industry is highly competitive. We are currently developing therapeutics that will compete, if approved, with other products and therapies that currently exist, are being developed or will in the future be developed, some of which we may not currently be aware. Competitors who are developing products in the same fields or that target the same indications as us with products that have a similar mechanism of action may experience problems with its products that could identify problems that would potentially harmadversely affect our business.

We have competitors both in the United States and internationally, including major multinational pharmaceutical companies, established biotechnology companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies, universities and other research institutions. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, manufacturing, marketing, product development, technical and human resources than we do. Large pharmaceutical companies, in particular, have extensive experience in clinical testing, obtaining marketing approvals, recruiting patients and manufacturing pharmaceutical products. These companies also have significantly greater research and marketing capabilities than we do and may also have products that have been approved or are in late stages of development, and collaborative arrangements in our target markets with leading companies and research institutions. Established pharmaceutical companies may also invest heavily to accelerate discovery and development of novel compounds or to in-license novel compounds that could make the product candidates that we develop obsolete. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. As a result of all of these factors, our competitors may succeed in obtaining patent protection and/or marketing approval or discovering, developing and commercializing products in our field before we do.

There are a large number of companies developing or marketing treatments for cancer, including many major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. These treatments consist both of small molecule drug products, such as traditional chemotherapy, as well as novel immunotherapies. Our commercial opportunities could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have fewer or less severe effects, are more convenient, have a broader label, are marketed more effectively, are reimbursed or are less expensive than any products that we may develop. Our competitors also may obtain FDA, EMA or other marketing approval for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market. Even if the product candidate we develop achieve marketing approval, they may be priced at a significant premium over competitive products if any have been approved by then, resulting in reduced competitiveness.

Smaller and other early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. In addition, the biopharmaceutical industry is characterized by rapid technological change. If we fail to stay at the forefront of technological change, we may be unable to compete effectively. Technological advances or products developed by our competitors may render our product candidates obsolete, less competitive or not economical.

If we fail to maintain orphan drug exclusivity for IRX-2 or we fail to obtain or maintain such exclusivity for any future product candidate we may license, our competitors may sell products to treat the same conditions, and our revenues would be significantly adversely affected.

In July 2005 the FDA granted orphan drug designation for IRX-2 for head or neck cancer. In the U.S., orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers. The company that first obtains FDA approval for a designated orphan drug for a given rare disease receives marketing exclusivity for use of that drug for the stated disease or condition for a period of seven years, with an additional six months if for a pediatric indication. Orphan drug exclusive marketing rights may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective, a subsequent product is deemed clinically superior, or if the manufacturer is unable to deliver sufficient quantity of the drug.

In the E.U., the EMA’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, or COMP, grants orphan drug designation to promote the development of products that are intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting not more than five in 10,000 persons in the EU Community and for which no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention, or treatment has been authorized (or the product would be a significant benefit to those affected). Additionally, designation is granted for products intended for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition and when, without incentives, it is unlikely that sales of the drug in the EU would be sufficient to justify the necessary investment in developing the medicinal product. An EU orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as reduction of fees or fee waivers and 10 years of market exclusivity is granted following medicinal product approval. This period may be reduced to six years if the orphan drug designation criteria are no longer met, including where it is shown that the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of market exclusivity. Orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting an application for marketing approval. Orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in, or shorten the duration of, the regulatory review and approval process.

Because the extent and scope of patent protection for IRX-2 may be particularly limited, orphan drug designation is especially important. We plan to rely on the orphan exclusivity period to maintain a competitive position. However, if we cannot maintain orphan exclusivity for our IRX-2, our competitors may then sell the same drug to treat the same condition and our revenues will be reduced. Also, without strong patent protection, competitors may sell a generic version upon the expiration of orphan exclusivity, if our patent position is not upheld.

Even if we obtain orphan drug designation for our future product candidates, we may not fulfill the criteria for exclusivity, or we may not be the first to obtain marketing approval for any orphan indication. Further, even if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a particular product, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different drugs can be approved for the same condition. Even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve a drug for the same condition if the FDA concludes that the later drug is safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care. The FDA can discontinue Orphan Drug exclusivity after it has been granted if the orphan drug cannot be manufactured in sufficient quantities to meet demand.

The commercial success of any current or future product candidate will depend upon the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, payors and others in the medical community.

We have never commercialized a product, and even if we obtain any regulatory approval for our product candidates, the commercial success of our product candidates will depend in part on the medical community, patients, and payors accepting our product candidates as effective, safe and cost-effective. Any product that we bring to the market may not gain market acceptance by physicians, patients, payors and others in the medical community. Physicians are often reluctant to switch their patients from existing therapies even when new and potentially more effective or convenient treatments enter the market. Further, patients often acclimate to the therapy that they are currently taking and do not want to switch unless their physicians recommend switching products or they are required to switch therapies due to lack of reimbursement for existing therapies.

The degree of market acceptance of these product candidates, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number of factors, including:

the potential efficacy and potential advantages over alternative treatments;
the frequency and severity of any side effects, including any limitations or warnings contained in a product’s approved labeling;
the frequency and severity of any side effects resulting from follow-up requirements for the administration of our product candidates;
the relative convenience and ease of administration;
the willingness of the target patient population to try new therapies and of physicians to prescribe these therapies;
the strength of marketing and distribution support and timing of market introduction of competitive products;
formulary acceptance;
publicity concerning our products or competing products and treatments; and
sufficient third-party insurance coverage and adequate reimbursement.

Even if a product candidate displays a favorable efficacy and safety profile in preclinical studies and clinical trials, market acceptance of the product, if approved for commercial sale, will not be known until after it is commercially launched. Our efforts to educate the medical community and payors on the benefits of our product candidates may require significant resources and may never be successful. Such efforts to educate the marketplace may require more resources than are required by the conventional technologies marketed by our competitors. If these products do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenue and may not become profitable.

Risks Related to Brooklyn’s Dependence on Third Parties

We or our affiliates’ employees, independent contractors, principal investigators, consultants, commercial collaborators, service providers and other vendors or potential collaborators may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements, which could harm the results of our operations.

We are exposed to the risk that our employees or affiliates’ employees and contractors, including any prospective or current principal investigators, CROs, consultants, commercial collaborators, service providers and other vendors may engage in misconduct or other illegal activity. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless or negligent conduct or other unauthorized activities that violate the laws and regulations of the FDA or other similar regulatory bodies, including those laws that require the reporting of true, complete and accurate information to such regulatory bodies; manufacturing and the FDA’s GCP or cGMP standards; federal, state and foreign healthcare fraud and abuse laws and data privacy; or laws that require the true, complete and accurate reporting of financial information or data. In particular, sales, marketing and other business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws intended to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing, bribery, corruption, antitrust violations and other abusive practices. These laws may restrict or prohibit a wide range of business activities, including research, manufacturing, distribution, pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements.

Activities subject to these laws also involve the improper use or misrepresentation of information obtained during clinical trials, creating fraudulent data in our nonclinical studies or clinical trials or illegal misappropriation of drug product, which could result in data being eliminated from the final analysis of studies, regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to identify and deter employee or third-party misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting them from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with such laws or regulations. Additionally, we are subject to the risk that a person, including any person who may have engaged in any fraud or misconduct, or government agency could allege such fraud or other misconduct, even if none occurred. Furthermore, we rely on our CROs and clinical trial sites to adequately report data from ongoing clinical trials. Any failure by such parties to adequately report safety events to us in a timely manner from any such trials may also affect the approvability of our product candidates or cause delays and disruptions for the approval of any of our product candidates, if at all. If we or our affiliates’ employees, independent contractors, principal investigators, consultants, commercial collaborators, service providers or other vendors are alleged or found to be in violation of any such regulatory standards or requirements, or become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement and curtailment of our operations, it could have a significant impact on our business and financial results, including the imposition of significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines, suspension or delay in Brooklyn’s clinical trials, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs or formulary and pharmacy benefit management programs, FDA debarment, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and additional reporting requirements and oversight, any of which could harm our ability to operate our business and results of operations.

We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties to conduct our clinical studies, and those third parties may not perform satisfactorily, including failing to meet deadlines for the completion of such studies.

Outside of the INSPIRE trial, each of the trials involving IRX-2 that are currently being performed are investigator-sponsored trials. Outside our providing study drug and financial support for these studies, we have less involvement and less control of these studies than we would if these were our studies. Negative results from these studies could have material adverse effects on our business despite our lack of control.

We may seek to enter into collaborations with third parties for the development and commercialization of our product candidates. If we fail to enter into such collaborations, or such collaborations are not successful, we may not be able to capitalize on the market potential of IRX-2 or any other product we may acquire or in-license.

We may seek third-party collaborators for development and commercialization of IRX-2 or any other product we may acquire or in-license. Our likely collaborators for any marketing, distribution, development, licensing or broader collaboration arrangements include large and mid-size pharmaceutical companies, regional and national pharmaceutical companies, non-profit organizations, government agencies, and biotechnology companies. We will face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. We may not be successful in our efforts to establish a strategic partnership or other alternative arrangements for our product candidates because such product candidates may be deemed to be at too early of a stage of development for collaborative effort and third parties may not view our product candidates as having the requisite potential to demonstrate safety and efficacy. We are currently party to a limited number of such arrangements and have limited control over the amount and timing of resources that our collaborators dedicate to the development or commercialization of our product candidates. Our ability to generate revenues from these arrangements will depend on our collaborators’ abilities to successfully perform the functions assigned to them in these arrangements. If and when we collaborate with a third party for development and commercialization of a product candidate, we can expect to relinquish some or all of the control over the future success of that product candidate to the third party. Our ability to reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon assessment of the collaborator’s resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator’s evaluation of a number of factors.

Collaborations involving our product candidates currently pose, and will continue to pose, the following risks to it:

collaborators have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to these collaborations;
collaborators may not pursue development and commercialization of our product candidates or may elect not to continue or renew development or commercialization programs based on preclinical or clinical study results, changes in the collaborators’ strategic focus or available funding, or external factors such as an acquisition that diverts resources or creates competing priorities;

collaborators may delay clinical studies, provide insufficient funding for a clinical study program, stop a clinical study or abandon a product candidate, repeat or conduct new clinical studies or require a new formulation of a product candidate for clinical testing;
collaborators could independently develop, or develop with third parties, products that compete directly or indirectly with our product candidates if the collaborators believe that competitive products are more likely to be successfully developed or can be commercialized under terms that are more economically attractive than ours;
collaborators with marketing and distribution rights to one or more products may not commit sufficient resources to the marketing and distribution of such product or products;
collaborators may not properly maintain or defend our intellectual property rights or may use our proprietary information in such a way as to invite litigation that could jeopardize or invalidate its intellectual property or proprietary information or expose it to potential litigation;
collaborators may infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties, which may expose us to litigation and potential liability;
disputes may arise between the collaborators and us that result in the delay or termination of the research, development or commercialization of our product candidates or that result in costly litigation or arbitration that diverts management attention and resources; and
collaborations may be terminated and, if terminated, may result in a need for additional capital to pursue further development or commercialization of the applicable product candidates.

Collaboration agreements may not lead to development or commercialization of our product candidates in the most efficient manner or at all. If a collaborator of ours were to be involved in a business combination, the continued pursuit and emphasis on its product development or commercialization program could be delayed, diminished or terminated.

Risks Relating to Brooklyn’sEterna’s Intellectual Property

If we are unable to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protection, for our products and product candidates, or if the scope of the patent and other intellectual property protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize products similar or identical to ours,those derived from our intellectual property, and our ability to successfully commercialize our products and product candidatesachieve profitability may be adversely affected.

Our ability to compete effectively will depend, in part, on our ability to maintain the proprietary nature of our technology and manufacturing processes. We rely on research, manufacturing and other know-how, patents, trade secrets, license agreements and contractual provisions to establish our intellectual property rights and protect our products and product candidates.rights. These legal means, however, afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights. As of April 12, 2022, our intellectual property portfolio included 16 patents in the United States and an additional 92 patents around the world.

In certain situations, and as considered appropriate, we have sought, and we intend to continue to seek to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the United States and, in at least some cases, one or more countries outside the United States relating to current and future products and product candidates that we or our strategic partners or collaborators may develop that are important to our business. However, we cannot predict whether the patent applications currently being pursued will issue as patents, or whether the claims of any resulting patents will provide us with a competitive advantage or whether we will be able to successfully pursue patent applications in the future relating to our current or futuresuch products and product candidates. Moreover, the patent application and approval processes are expensive and time-consuming. We may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. Furthermore, we, or any future partners, collaborators, or licensees, may fail to identify patentable aspects of inventions made in the course of development and commercialization activities before it is too late to obtain patent protection on them. Therefore, we may miss potential opportunities to seek additional patent protection. It is possible that defects of form in the preparation or filing of patent applications may exist, or may arise in the future, for example with respect to proper priority claims, inventorship, claim scope, or requests for patent term adjustments. If we fail to establish, maintain or protect such patents and other intellectual property rights, such rights may be reduced or eliminated. If there are material defects in the form, preparation, prosecution or enforcement of our patents or patent applications, such patents may be invalid and/or unenforceable, and such applications may never result in valid, enforceable patents.

Even if they are unchallenged, our patents and patent applications, if issued, may not provide us with any meaningful protection or prevent competitors from designing around our patent claims by developing similar or alternative technologies or therapeutics in a non-infringing manner. For example, a third party may develop a competitive therapy that provides benefits similar to one or more of ourthe future products and product candidates that we or our strategic partners or collaborators may develop but that falls outside the scope of our patent protection. If the patent protection provided by the patents and patent applications we hold or pursue with respect to oursuch product candidates is not sufficiently broad to impede such competition, our ability to successfully commercialize ourthe successful commercialization of such product candidates could be negatively affected.

Other parties, many of whom have substantially greater resources and have made significant investments in competing technologies, have developed or may develop technologies that may be related or competitive with our approach, and may have filed or may file patent applications and may have been issued or may be issued patents with claims that overlap or conflict with our patent applications, either by claiming the same compositions, formulations or methods or by claiming subject matter that could dominate our patent position. In addition, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. As a result, any patents we may obtain in the future may not provide us with adequate and continuing patent protection sufficient to exclude others from commercializing products similar to ourfuture products and product candidates.candidates that we or our strategic partners or collaborators may develop.

The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents has emerged to date in the United States or in many foreign jurisdictions. The standards applied by the USPTO and foreign patent offices in granting patents are not always applied uniformly or predictably. In addition, the determination of patent rights with respect to pharmaceutical compounds commonly involves complex legal and factual questions, which has in recent years been the subject of much litigation. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our patent rights are highly uncertain. Our competitors may also seek approval to market their own products similar to or otherwise competitive with our products. Alternatively, our competitors may seek to market generic versions of any approved products by submitting ANDAs or ABLAs to the FDA in which they claim that our patents are invalid, unenforceable or not infringed. In these circumstances, we may need to defend or assert our patents, or both, including by filing lawsuits alleging patent infringement. In any of these types of proceedings, a court or other agency with jurisdiction may find our patents invalid or unenforceable, or that our competitors are competing in a non-infringing manner. Thus, evenwe cannot offer any assurances about which, if we have validany, patents will issue, the breadth of any such patents, whether any issued patents will be found invalid and enforceableunenforceable or will be threatened by third parties or whether any issued patents these patents still may not provide protection againstwill effectively prevent others from commercializing competing products or processes sufficient to achieve our business objectives.technologies and drug candidates.

In addition to patent protection, we expect to rely heavily on trade secrets, know-how and other unpatented technology, which are difficult to protect. Although we seek such protection in part by entering into confidentiality agreements with our vendors, employees, consultants and others who may have access to proprietary information, we cannot be certain that these agreements will not be breached, adequate remedies for any breach would be available, or our trade secrets, know-how and other unpatented proprietary technology will not otherwise become known to or be independently developed by our competitors. If we are unsuccessful in protecting our intellectual property rights, sales of our products may suffer and our ability to generate revenue could be severely impacted.

We cannot ensure that patent rights relating to inventions described and claimed in our pending patent applications will issue, or that our issued patents or patents that issue in the future will not be challenged and rendered invalid and/or unenforceable.

The patent application process is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that we or any of our potential future collaborators will be successful in protecting our drug candidates by obtaining and defending patents. We have pending and issued U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications in our portfolio; however, we cannot predict:

if and when patents may issue based on our patent applications;
the scope of protection of any patent issuing based on our patent applications;
whether the claims of any issued patent will provide protection against competitors;
whether or not third parties will find ways to invalidate or circumvent our patent rights;
whether or not others will obtain patents claiming aspects similar to those covered by our patents and patent applications;
whether we will need to initiate litigation or administrative proceedings to enforce and/or defend our patent rights which will be costly whether we win or lose; and/or
whether the patent applications will result in issued patents with claims that cover each of our drug candidates or uses thereof in the United States or in other foreign countries.

We may be subject to a third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the USPTO or become involved in post-grant review procedures, oppositions, derivations, revocation, reexaminations, inter partes review or interference proceedings, in the United States or elsewhere, challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others. An adverse determination in any such challenge may result in loss of exclusivity or in our patent claims being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products. Such challenges also may result in substantial cost and require significant time from our scientists and management, even if the eventual outcome is favorable to us. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. Furthermore, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, regardless of the outcome, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future drug candidates.

We may rely on more than one patent to provide multiple layers of patent protection for our drug candidates. If the latest-expiring patent is invalidated or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, the overall protection for the drug candidate may be adversely affected. For example, if the latest-expiring patent is invalidated, the overall patent term for our drug candidate could be adversely affected.

Issued patents covering ourfuture products and product candidates that we or our strategic partners or collaborators may develop could be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged in court or in administrative proceedings. We may not be able to protect our trade secrets in court.

If we initiate legal proceedings against a third-party to enforce a patent covering one offuture products and product candidates that we or our productsstrategic partners or product candidates,collaborators may develop, the defendant could counterclaim that the patent covering our productsuch products or product candidatecandidates is invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, written description or non- enablement.non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld information material to patentability from the USPTO, or made a misleading statement, during prosecution. Third parties also may raise similar claims before administrative bodies in the United States or abroad, even outside the context of litigation. Such mechanisms include re- examination, post grant review, inter partes review and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions. An adverse determination in any of the foregoing proceedings could result in the revocation or cancellation of, or amendment to, our patents in such a way that they no longer cover future products and product candidates that we or our productsstrategic partners or product candidates.collaborators may develop. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which the patent examiner and we were unaware during prosecution. If a defendant or third party were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity or unenforceability, we could lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on one or more of ourthe future products and product candidates.candidates that we or our strategic partners or collaborators may develop. Such a loss of patent protection could have a material adverse impact on our business.

In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. Competitors and other third parties could purchase ourfuture products and product candidates that we or our strategic partners or collaborators may develop and attempt to replicate some or all of the competitive advantages we derive from our development efforts, willfully infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate our intellectual property rights, design around our protected technology or develop their own competitive technologies that fall outside of our intellectual property rights. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, we would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate it, from using that technology or information to compete with us. If our trade secrets are not adequately protected or sufficient to provide an advantage over our competitors, our competitive position could be adversely affected, as could our business. Additionally, if the steps taken to maintain our trade secrets are deemed inadequate, we may have insufficient recourse against third parties for misappropriating our trade secrets.

Obtaining and maintaining patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non- compliance with these requirements.

Periodic maintenance fees, renewal fees, annuity fees and various other governmental fees on patents and applications are required to be paid to the USPTO and various governmental patent agencies outside of the United States in several stages over the lifetime of the patents and applications. The USPTO and various non-U.S. governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedurals, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process and after a patent has issued. There are situations in which non- compliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. The terms of one or more licenses that we enter into the future may not provide us with the ability to maintain or prosecute patents in the portfolio and must therefore rely on third parties to do so. If we fail to obtain and maintain the patents and patent applications covering our products or procedures, we may not be able to stop a competitor from marketing products that are the same as our product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

If we do not obtain patent term extension and data exclusivity for future products that we or our products and product candidates,strategic partners or collaborators may successfully develop, our business may be materially harmed.

Patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States, if all maintenance fees are timely paid, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years from its earliest U.S. non-provisional filing date. Various extensions may be available, but the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Even if patents covering ourfuture products and product candidates that we or our strategic partners or collaborators may develop are obtained, once the patent life has expired for a particular product, candidate, we or our strategic partners or collaborators may be open to competition from competitive products. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are approved and commercialized. As a result, our patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.

In the future, if we obtain an issued patent covering one of our present or futurethe product candidates that we or our strategic partners or collaborators may develop, depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of any FDA marketing approval of such product candidates, such patent may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, or Hatch-Waxman Amendments. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent extension term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process.process for drugs and biologics. A patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval, only one patent may be extended and only those claims covering the approved drug, a method for using it or a method for manufacturing it may be extended. A patent may only be extended once and only based on a single approved product. However, we may not be granted an extension because of, for example, failure to obtain a granted patent before approval of a product candidate, failure to exercise due diligence during the testing phase or regulatory review process, failure to apply within applicable deadlines, failure to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise our failure to satisfy applicable requirements. A patent licensed to us by a third party may not be available for patent term extension. Moreover, the applicable time period or the scope of patent protection afforded could be less than we request. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or the term of any such extension is less than we request, our competitors may obtain approval of competing products following our patent expiration, and our revenue could be reduced, possibly materially.

Changes in patent law in the United States and other jurisdictions could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect ourfuture products and product candidates.candidates that we or our strategic partners or collaborators may develop.

Changes in either the patent laws or the interpretation of the patent laws in the United States or other jurisdictions could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of patent applications and the enforcement or defense of issued patents. On September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, was signed into law. When implemented, the Leahy-Smith Act included several significant changes to U.S. patent law that impacted how patent rights could be prosecuted, enforced and defended. In particular, the Leahy-Smith Act also included provisions that switched the United States from a “first-to-invent” system to a “first-to-file” system, allowed third- party submission of prior art to the USPTO during patent prosecution and set forth additional procedures to attack the validity of a patent by the USPTO administered post grant proceedings. Under a first-to-file system, assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application generally will be entitled to the patent on an invention regardless of whether another inventor had made the invention earlier. The USPTO developed new regulations and procedures governing the administration of the Leahy-Smith Act, and many of the substantive changes to patent law associated with the Leahy-Smith Act, and in particular, the first to file provisions, only became effective on March 16, 2013. Some of the Company’s patents and patent applications have effective dates later than March 16, 2013 and thus will be subject to the provisions of the Leahy-Smith Act.

In addition, the patent positions of companies in the development and commercialization of biologics and pharmaceuticals are particularly uncertain. Recent rulings from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court have narrowed the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances and weakened the rights of patent owners in certain situations. This combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the validity and enforceability of patents, once obtained. Depending on future actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that could have a material adverse effect on our existing patent portfolio and our ability to protect and enforce our intellectual property in the future.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Filing, prosecuting, maintaining, defending and enforcing patents on products and product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States could be less extensive than those in the United States. The requirements for patentability may differ in certain countries, particularly in developing countries; thus, even in countries where we do pursue patent protection, there can be no assurance that any patents will issue with claims that cover our products. There can be no assurance that we will obtain or maintain patent rights in or outside the United States under any future license agreements. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from utilizing our inventions in all countries outside the United States, even in jurisdictions where we pursue patent protection, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not pursued and obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection, but enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with ourfuture products and product candidates that we or our strategic partners or collaborators may develop and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.competing with us.

some countries outside of the United States and Europe do not afford intellectual property protection to the same extent as the laws of the United States and Europe. Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries including India and China, do not favor the enforcement of patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biotechnology and pharmaceutical products, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary rights generally. For example, many foreign countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner must grant licenses to third parties. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in certain countries outside the United States and Europe. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against government authorities or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of such patent. If we are forced to grant a license to third parties with respect to any patents relevant to our business, our competitive position may be impaired, and our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may be adversely affected.

Proceedings to enforce our patent rights, even if obtained, in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. While we intend to protect our intellectual property rights in major markets for our products, we cannot ensure that we will be able to initiate or maintain similar efforts in all jurisdictions in which we may wish to market our products. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop.

We may not identify relevant third-party patents or may incorrectly interpret the relevance, scope or expiration of a third-party patent, which might adversely affect our ability to develop and market our products.

We cannot guarantee that any of our patent searches or analyses, including the identification of relevant patents, the scope of patent claims or the expiration of relevant patents, are complete or thorough, nor can we be certain that we have identified each and every third-party patent and pending application in the United States and abroad that is relevant to or necessary for the commercialization of our drug candidates in any jurisdiction.

The scope of a patent claim is determined by an interpretation of the law, the written disclosure in a patent and the patent’s prosecution history. Our interpretation of the relevance or the scope of a patent or a pending application may be incorrect. For example, we may incorrectly determine that our products are not covered by a third-party patent or may incorrectly predict whether a third-party’s pending application will issue with claims of relevant scope. Our determination of the expiration date of any patent in the United States or abroad that we consider relevant may be incorrect. Our failure to identify and correctly interpret relevant patents may negatively impact our ability to develop and market our products.

We may be subject to claims by third parties asserting that our employees or we have misappropriated their intellectual property or claiming ownership of what we regard as our own intellectual property.

Many of our current and former employees, including our senior management, were previously employed at universities or at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including some which may be competitors or potential competitors. Some of these employees may be subject to proprietary rights, non-disclosure and non- competition agreements, or similar agreements, in connection with such previous employment. Although we try to ensure that our employees do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or these employees have used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any such third party. Litigation may be necessary to defend against such claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel or sustain damages. Such intellectual property rights could be awarded to a third party, and we could be required to obtain a license from such third party to commercialize our technology or products. Such a license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management.

In addition, while we typically require our employees, consultants and contractors who may be involved in the development of intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to us, we may be unsuccessful in executing such an agreement with each party who in fact develops intellectual property that we regard as our own, which may result in claims by or against us related to the ownership of such intellectual property. If we fail in prosecuting or defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights. Even if we are successful in prosecuting or defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to our senior management and scientific personnel.

We may be subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of our patents and other intellectual property.

We or our licensors may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators or other third parties have an interest in our patents, trade secrets, or other intellectual property as an inventor or co- inventor. For example, we or our collaborators may have inventorship disputes arise from conflicting obligations of employees, consultants or others who are involved in developing our drug candidates. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these and other claims challenging inventorship or ownership of our patents, trade secrets or other intellectual property. If we or our licensors fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, intellectual property that is important to our drug candidates. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents and other intellectual property rights, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe our patents, trademarks, copyrights or other intellectual property. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time consuming and divert the time and attention of our management and scientific personnel. In addition, our patents may become, involved in inventorship, priority, or validity disputes. To counter or defend against such claims can be expensive and time-consuming, and our adversaries may have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to prosecuting these legal actions than we can. Any claims we assert against perceived infringers could provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us alleging that we infringe their patents, in addition to counterclaims asserting that our patents are invalid or unenforceable, or both.

In an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent is invalid or unenforceable or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating intellectual property rights we own or control. An adverse result in any litigation proceeding could put one or more of our owned or in-licensed patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly. Further, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation.

Even if resolved in our favor, the court may decide not to grant an injunction against further infringing activity and instead award only monetary damages, which may or may not be an adequate remedy. Litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims may cause us to incur significant expenses and could distract our personnel from their normal responsibilities. Alternatively, we may be required to obtain a license from such third party in order to use the infringing technology and continue developing, manufacturing or marketing the infringing drug candidate. However, we may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we were able to obtain a license, it could be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. In addition, we could be found liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to have willfully infringed a patent. Furthermore, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions, or other interim proceedings or developments, and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce the resources available for development activities or any future sales, marketing, or distribution activities.

We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to conduct such litigation or proceedings adequately. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources and more mature and developed intellectual property portfolios. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace.

If our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then we may not be able to build name recognition in our marks of interest and our business may be adversely affected.

Our current or future trademarks or trade names may be challenged, infringed, circumvented or declared generic or determined to be infringing on other marks. We rely on both registration and common law protection for our trademarks. We may not be able to protect our rights to these trademarks and trade names or may be forced to stop using these names, which we need for name recognition by potential partners or customers in our markets of interest. During trademark registration proceedings, we may receive rejections. Although we would be given an opportunity to respond to those rejections, we may be unable to overcome such rejections. In addition, with the USPTO and with comparable agencies in many foreign jurisdictions, third parties are given an opportunity to oppose pending trademark applications and to seek to cancel registered trademarks. Opposition or cancellation proceedings may be filed against our trademarks, and our trademarks may not survive such proceedings. If we are unable to establish name recognition based on our trademarks and trade names, we may not be able to compete effectively and our business may be adversely affected. We may license our trademarks and trade names to third parties, such as distributors. Although these license agreements may provide guidelines for how our trademarks and trade names may be used, a breach of these agreements or misuse of our trademarks and tradenames by our licensees may jeopardize our rights in or diminish the goodwill associated with our trademarks and trade names.

Moreover, any proprietary name we have proposed to use with our drug candidates in the United States must be approved by the FDA, regardless of whether we have registered it, or applied to register it, as a trademark. Similar requirements exist in Europe. The FDA typically conducts a review of proposed proprietary product names, including an evaluation of potential for confusion with other product names. If the FDA (or an equivalent administrative body in a foreign jurisdiction) objects to any of our proposed proprietary product names, we may be required to expend significant additional resources in an effort to identify a suitable substitute name that would qualify under applicable trademark laws, not infringe the existing rights of third parties, and be acceptable to the FDA. Furthermore, in many countries, owning and maintaining a trademark registration may not provide an adequate defense against a subsequent infringement claim asserted by the owner of a senior trademark. At times, competitors or other third parties may adopt trade names or trademarks similar to ours, thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity and possibly leading to market confusion. In addition, there could be potential trade name or trademark infringement claims brought by owners of other registered trademarks or trademarks that incorporate variations of our registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names. If we assert trademark infringement claims, a court may determine that the marks we have asserted are invalid or unenforceable, or that the party against whom we have asserted trademark infringement has superior rights to the marks in question. In this case, we could ultimately be forced to cease use of such trademarks.

ITEM 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
 
We do not have any unresolved comments issued by the SEC Staff.

ITEM 1C.Cybersecurity
Risk Management and Strategy

We have established policies and processes for assessing, identifying, and managing material risk from cybersecurity threats, and have integrated these processes into our overall risk management systems and processes. We monitor cybersecurity threats, including any potential unauthorized occurrence on or conducted through our information systems that we use through third party providers that may result in adverse effects on the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of our information systems or any information residing therein.
We engage consultants in connection with our risk assessment processes. These service providers assist us in designing and implementing our cybersecurity policies and procedures, as well as monitoring and testing our safeguards. We require each third-party service provider to certify that it has the ability to implement and maintain appropriate security measures, consistent with all applicable laws, to implement and maintain reasonable security measures in connection with their work with us, and to promptly report any suspected breach of its security measures that may affect our company.
As of December 31, 2023 and through the date of the filing of this report, we are not aware  of any cybersecurity incidents that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. For additional information regarding risks from cybersecurity threats, please refer to Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in this report.
Governance

One of the key functions of our board of directors is informed oversight of our risk management process, including risks from cybersecurity threats. Our board of directors is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure, and our executive officers are responsible for the day-to-day management of the material risks we face. Our board of directors administers its cybersecurity risk oversight function through its audit committee, which provides oversight of our cybersecurity program as part of its periodic review of enterprise risk management.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance are primarily responsible for assessing and managing our material risks from cybersecurity threats. In this regard, our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance have assistance from consultants.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance oversee our cybersecurity policies and processes, including those described in “Risk Management and Strategy” above. Under such policies and processes, our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President are responsible for reporting to our audit committee regarding any cybersecurity incidents.
The audit committee, in turn, provides periodic reports to our board of directors regarding our cybersecurity processes, including the results of cybersecurity risk assessments.
ITEM 2.Properties
 
We currently lease approximately 9,00049,000 square feet of office and laboratory space in the aggregate in New York and Massachusetts, of which, approximately 45,000 square feet is new office and California.laboratory space in Somerville, Massachusetts that we subleased in October 2022. The terms of our leases expire from December 2026 through June 2028.approximately November 2033. We believe that our leased property meetsproperties are generally well maintained, in good operating condition and meet our current business needs.
 
ITEM 3.Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we become involved in litigation and arbitrations in the ordinary course of business. Legal fees and other costs associated with such actions are expensed as incurred. In addition, we assess the need to record a liability for litigation and contingencies. We reserve for costs relating to these matters when a loss is probable, and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Merger-Related Shareholder Litigation

Brooklyn (then known as NTN Buzztime, Inc.) and its former directors were named as defendants in ten substantially similar actions arising out of the Merger that were brought by purported pre-Merger stockholders of Brooklyn: Henson v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-08663-LGS (S.D.N.Y.); Monsour v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-08755-LGS (S.D.N.Y.); Amanfo v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-08747-LGS (S.D.N.Y.); Carlson v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-00047-LGS (S.D.N.Y.); Finger v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-00728-LGS (S.D.N.Y.); Falikman v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-05106-EK-SJB (E.D.N.Y.); Haas v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 3:20-cv-02123-BAS-JLB (S.D. Cal.); Gallo v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 3:21-cv-00157-WQH-AGS (S.D. Cal.); Chinta v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-01401-CFC (D. Del.); and Nicosia v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-00125-CFC (D. Del.) (collectively, the “Stockholder Actions”).  Only two of the Stockholder Actions (the Chinta and Nicosia cases) also named Brooklyn LLC. These actions asserted claims alleging violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder and both the Chinta and Nicosia cases alleged that Brooklyn LLC is a controlling person of Brooklyn. The complaints generally alleged that the defendants failedour legal proceedings, refer to disclose allegedly material information in a Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on October 2, 2020, including: (1) certain details regarding any projections or forecasts of Brooklyn or Brooklyn LLC may have made, and the analyses performed by Brooklyn’s financial advisor, Newbridge Securities Corporation; (2) conflicts concerning the sales process; and (3) disclosures regarding whether or not Brooklyn entered into any confidentiality agreements with standstill and/or “don’t ask, don’t waive” provisions. The complaints generally alleged that these purported failures to disclose rendered such Registration Statement on Form S-4 false and misleading. The complaints requested: preliminary and permanent injunction of the Merger; rescission of the Merger if executed and/or rescissory damages in unspecified amounts; directionNote 13 to the individual directors to disseminate a compliant Registration Statement on Form S-4; an accounting by Brooklyn for all alleged damages suffered; a declaration that certain federal securities laws had been violated; and reimbursement of costs, including attorneys’ and expert fees and expenses. On or about February 26, 2021, in order to render moot certain of the disclosure claims asserted in the Stockholder Actions, to avoid nuisance, potential expense, and delay, and to provide additional information to Brooklyn’s stockholders, Brooklyn determined to voluntarily supplement the Form S-4 with certain additional disclosures. In exchange for those disclosures, the plaintiffs in each of the Stockholder Actions agreed to voluntarily dismiss their claims. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K all ten actions have been dismissed. Following the dismissal the parties amicably resolved plaintiffs’ counsel’s request for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses based on the purported benefit contented to be conferred on Brooklyn’s stockholders as a result of the supplemental disclosures.

Dhesh Govender v. Brooklyn Immunotherapeutics, LLC, et al., Index No. 650847/2021 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. 2021)

On or about February 5, 2021, Dhesh Govender, a former short-term consultant of Brooklyn LLC, filed a complaint against Brooklyn LLC and certain individuals that plaintiff alleges were directors of Brooklyn LLC. The complaint is captioned, Dhesh Govender v. Brooklyn Immunotherapeutics, LLC, et al., Index No. 650847/2021 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. 2021). Plaintiff alleges that Brooklyn LLC and certain of its officers engaged in unlawful and discriminatory conduct based on race, national origin and hostile work environment. Plaintiff also asserts various breach of contract, fraud and quantum meruit claims based on an alleged oral agreement pursuant to which he alleges Brooklyn LLC agreed to hire him as an executive once the Merger was completed. In particular, plaintiff alleges that, in exchange for transferring an opportunity to obtain an agreement to acquire a license from Novellus for its mRNA-based gene editing and cell reprogramming technology to Brooklyn LLC, he was promised a $500,000 salary and 7% of the equity of Brooklyn LLC. Based on these and other allegations, plaintiff seeks damages of not less than $10 million, a permanent injunction enjoining Brooklyn LLC from exercising the option to acquire such license from Novellus or completing the proposed Merger. On or about February 19, 2021, an amended complaint was filed asserting the same causes of action but withdrawing the request for injunctive relief. On June 6, 2021, defendants filed a motion to compel arbitration or, in the alternative, for partial dismissal of the complaint for failure to state viable fraud, quantum meruit and employment discrimination claims. After obtaining extensions of time to respond, plaintiff opposed the defendants’ motion on August 9, 2021. The defendants filed their reply on September 3, 2021. The Court heard oral argument on the motion to compel arbitration and/or dismiss and the motion to seal on October 13, 2021. By Order dated November 10, 2021, the Court granted defendants’ motion to compel Govender to arbitrate all of his claims against them, based on the arbitration clause of his consulting agreement with Brooklyn LLC.  Govender thereafter filed his Statement of Claim (the “Demand”) with the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”), Case No. 01-21-0017-9417, on December 15, 2021 against the same defendants, and served it on defendants’ counsel on February 3, 2022.  In his Demand, Govender continues to assert statutory discrimination claims against all defendants, claims against Brooklyn LLC premised on the breach of an alleged oral promise to issue Govender 7% of the equity of Brooklyn LLC and to employ Govender at a $500,000 annual salary in exchange for allegedly arranging and negotiating the Novellus license, common law fraud claims against the Company and Cherington based on the breach of these same promises and a claim for quantum meruit against the Brooklyn LLC.  In his Demand, Govender now claims that the fair and reasonable value of his services on the quantum meruit claim exceeded $100 million and is seeking damages in an amount to be determined at the hearing.  Defendants filed an answering statement to the Demand on February 28, 2022 and the parties are in the process of conferring on the selection of a three-member arbitration panel. At this stage in the litigation, the Company is not able to predict the probability of a favorable or unfavorable outcome.

Carlson v. Allen Wolff, Michael Gottlieb, Richard Simtob, Susan Miller, and NTN Buzztime, Inc., C.A. No. 2021-0193-KSJM (Del. Ch. Ct.)

On or about March 12, 2021, Douglas Carlson, a purported stockholder of Brooklyn (then known as NTN Buzztime, Inc.), filed a verified class action complaint against Brooklyn and its then current members of the board of directors, for allegedly breaching their fiduciary duties and violating Section 211(c) of the Delaware General Corporation Law.  In particular, plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to hold an annual stockholder meeting.  Plaintiff also moved for summary judgment at the same time that he filed his complaint.  In order to moot the claim addressed in the complaint, Brooklyn agreed to hold its annual meeting on June 29, 2021, which date was subsequently rescheduled to August 20, 2021.  On or about May 6, 2021, the parties entered into a stipulation, which was “so ordered” by the court, extending defendants’ time to respond to the complaint and to file their answering brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on or before July 16, 2021 and providing that plaintiff’s reply brief in support of his motion for summary judgment is due on or before August 20, 2021. On or about July 12, 2021, the parties entered in a further amended scheduling order, which provided that defendants were to respond to the complaint and file their answering brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on or before September 16, 2021 and plaintiff was to file its reply brief in support of his motion for summary judgment on or before October 20, 2021.  On August 20, 2021, Brooklyn convened its 2021 annual meeting. Due to the lack of a required quorum, the meeting was adjourned to September 3, 2021. Thereafter, Brooklyn obtained a quorum, and the annual meeting was held on September 3, 2021. On September 10, 2021, Brooklyn filed a report on Form 8-K with the SEC announcing the results of the annual meeting. On September 16, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation seeking voluntary dismissal of the complaint as moot. The Court entered the dismissal on September 16, 2021 with prejudice as to the named plaintiff and without prejudice as to other members of the purported class and retained jurisdiction for the purpose of determining any fee application to the extent it cannot be resolved amicably the parties. Thereafter, on or about November 12, 2022, the parties resolved plaintiff’s counsel’s request for an award of fees and expenses for the purported benefit that Carlson contended was received by stockholders as a result of his action. 

Edmund Truell Matter
On May 14, 2021, Edmund Truell, a stockholder of Brooklyn, alleged that he sustained a loss because he was unable to sell shares of common stock timely due to a delay caused by Brooklyn’s issuance of stock certificates in lieu of electronic book entry.

Emerald Private Equity Fund, LLC Matter

By a letter dated July 7, 2021, Emerald Private Equity Fund, LLC (“Emerald”), a stockholder of Brooklyn, made a demand pursuant to 8 Del. C. 220 to inspect certain books and records of Brooklyn. The stated purpose of the demand is to investigate possible wrongdoing by persons responsible for the implementation of the Merger and the issuance of paper stock certificates, including investigating  whether: (i) Brooklyn’s stock certificates were issued in accordance with the Merger Agreement; (ii) certain restrictions on the sale of Brooklyn common stock following the Merger were proper and applied without favor; (iii) anyone received priority in post-Merger issuances of Brooklyn’s stock certificates that allowed them to benefit from an increase in the trading price of Brooklyn’s common stock; and (iv) it should pursue remedial measures and/or report alleged misconduct to the SEC. Brooklyn has responded to the demand letter and has produced certain information to Emerald in connection with the demand,consolidated financial statements, which is subject to the terms of a confidentiality agreement entered into among the parties, including certain additional stockholders who have subsequent joined as parties to such agreement.  In October 2021, Emerald requested that Brooklyn produce additional information related to the authority, purpose and justification for the restriction imposed on the sale of Brooklyn common stock following the Merger and the timing of share delivery to Brooklyn stockholders, following which request Brooklyn agreed to produce certain additional information and emails relating to these topics.

On March 30, 2022, counsel to Emerald advised the Company that it was prepared to file suit against the Company, certain current and former directors of the Company, and the Company’s financial advisor in connection with the Merger, on behalf of Emerald and a class of similarly situated stockholders with respect to some or all of the foregoing matters, alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty, conversion and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty.  Emerald’s counsel has expressed a willingness to engage in private pre-suit early resolution discussions with the Company and its financial advisor on behalf of individual stockholders whom counsel represents in addition to Emerald; and the Company has agreed to respond to Emerald’s counselincorporated herein by April 22, 2022.  The Company can provide no assurance that such pre-suit early resolution discussions will be successful or that suit will not ultimately be filed against the Company, nor can the Company currently predict the outcome of any such suit, if filed.  The Company intends to defend itself vigorously against any and all claims.  Additionally, on April 7, 2022, the Company received a demand for indemnification from its financial advisor as it relates to the aforementioned potential lawsuit.

John Westman v. Novellus, Inc., Christopher Rohde, and Matthew Angel, Civil Action No. 2181CV01949 (Middlesex County (Massachusetts) Superior Court)

On or about September 7, 2021, John Westman, a former employee of Novellus, Inc. filed a Complaint in Middlesex County (Massachusetts) Superior Court against Novellus, Inc. and the company’s founders and former executives, Christopher Rohde and Matthew Angel (collectively, “Defendants”).  Brooklyn acquired Novellus, Inc. on July 16, 2021.  Mr. Westman’s claims relate to alleged conduct that took place before Brooklyn acquired Novellus, Inc.  Pursuant to the July 16, 2021 Agreement and Plan of Acquisition, as well as a separate agreement among Brooklyn, Novellus, Inc., Mr. Rohde, and Mr. Angel, Mr. Rohde and Mr. Angel are essentially assuming the defense of and paying the fees associated with defending against these claims.  To that end, on September 10, 2021, Morgan Lewis accepted service on behalf of all defendants. On December 24, 2021, Westman dismissed the case without prejudice so the parties could mediate the matter. The parties’ February 2022 mediation was unsuccessful, but Mr. Westman has not refiled suit.reference.
 
ITEM 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
 
Not Applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
Market Information
Our common stock is listed on The Nasdaq GlobalCapital Market under the symbol “BTX.“ERNA.
Holders of Common Stock
 
As of April March 12,, 2022, 2024, there were approximately 421155 stockholders of record. The number of stockholders of record is based onupon the actual number of holders registered on our books at such date.
A substantially greater number of holders of our common stock are “street name” or beneficial holders, whose shares are held by banks, brokers and other financial institutions.
 
Preferred Stock
We have 156,112 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding. The Series A Preferred Stock provides for a cumulative annual dividend of 10 cents per share, payable in semi-annual installments in June and December. Dividends may be paid in cash or in shares of our common stock. In 2021,2023, we paid approximately $8,000$16,000 in cash dividends and issued 202 shares of common stock in stock dividends to the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock. We expect to pay the dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock in accordance with its terms, though we may elect to pay the dividend in shares of our common stock in the future.terms.
 
Dividend Policy
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. NoWe currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends have been previously paidin the foreseeable future. Any future determination to declare cash dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to applicable laws and contractual limitations, and will depend on our common stockfinancial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions and none are anticipatedother factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
Information about our equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference to Item 12 of Part III of this report.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
We did not sell any unregistered securities during the period covered by this report that were not previously reported in 2022.a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K.
 
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
ITEM 6.[Reserved]
 
ITEM 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
This Annual Report on Form 10-K
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaningstatements. See “CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” in Part I of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”), Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, about our expectations, beliefs, or intentions regarding our product development efforts, business, financial condition, results of operations, strategies and prospects. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that these statements do not relate to historical or current matters. Rather, forward-looking statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities, trends or results as of the date they are made. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that have not yet occurred, thesethis report. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from anynot guarantees of future results expressedactivities or implied by the forward-looking statements.results. Many factors could cause our actual activities or results to differ materially from the activities and resultsthose anticipated in forward-looking statements. These factors includestatements, including those containeddiscussed in “Item 1A —1A. Risk Factors” of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required by applicable law. We intend that all forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbor provisions of PSLRA. These forward-looking statements reflect our views only as of the date they are made.report.

Overview

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceuticallife science company focused on exploringcommitted to realizing the role that cytokine-based therapy can have on the immune system in treatingpotential of mRNA cell engineering to provide patients with cancer, bothtransformational new medicines.  We have in-licensed a portfolio of over 100 patents covering key mRNA cell engineering technologies, including technologies for mRNA cell reprogramming, mRNA gene editing, the NoveSliceTM and UltraSliceTM gene-editing proteins, and the ToRNAdoTM mRNA delivery system, which we collectively refer to as a single agentour “mRNA technology platform.” We refer to aspects of our mRNA technology platform as “mRNA delivery,” “mRNA gene editing” and in combination with other anti-cancer therapies.“mRNA cell reprogramming.” We are seeking to develop IRX-2, a novel cytokine-based therapy, to treat patients with cancer. We also are exploring opportunities to advance oncology, blood disorder, and monogenic disease therapies using gene-editing and cell therapylicense our mRNA technology through a license withplatform from Factor Bioscience Limited (“Factor Limited”) under an exclusive license agreement.
Our near-term focus is on entering into strategic partnerships to deploy our mRNA technology platform. We expect that potential strategic partners will use our mRNA technology platform for preclinical and eventual clinical development of product candidates for a variety of clinical indications.
Following receipt of the results from the INSPIRE phase 2 trial of IRX-2, our only product candidate, in June 2022, we determined to cease the development of IRX-2. We do not currently plan to develop any product candidates. In the future we may develop and advance product candidates, either internally and/or Factor, and through our acquisition of Novellus, Inc. and Novellus, Ltd. in July 2021, or the Acquisition.strategic partnerships.

Recent DevelopmentsFinancings

Acquisition
In July 2023, we received $8.7 million from a private placement in which we issued $8.7 million in aggregate principal amount of Novellusconvertible notes (the “July 2023 convertible notes”) and warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 6.1 million shares of our common stock (the “July 2023 warrants”).

On December 8, 2023, we received $1.5 million in exchange for a 6% promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of $1.5 million we issued to Charles Cherington. The promissory note was to mature on January 8, 2024, and interest accrued at a rate of 6.0% per annum, payable at maturity.  On December 14, 2023, we repaid the $1.5 million of principal and $1,500 of accrued interest due under the promissory note.  There are no further obligations under the promissory note.
On December 14, 2023, we entered into a purchase agreement with certain purchasers for the private placement of $9.2 million of convertible notes (the “December 2023 convertible notes” and together with the July 16, 2021,2023 convertible notes, the “convertible notes”) and warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 9.6 million shares of our common stock (the “December 2023 warrants” and together with the July 2023 warrants, the “note warrants”).  There were two closings under this purchase agreement: on December 15, 2023, we acquired Novellus, Inc.received $7.8 million and Novellus, Inc.’s wholly owned subsidiary, Novellus, Ltd. Brooklyn also acquired 25.0%issued $7.8 million in December 2023 convertible notes and December 2023 warrants to purchase approximately 8.1 million shares of our common stock, and on January 11, 2024, we received the remaining $1.4 million and issued an aggregate of $1.4 million in December 2023 convertible notes and December 2023 warrants to purchase approximately 1.5 million shares of our common stock.
The July 2023 convertible notes bear interest at 6% per annum, and the December 2023 convertible notes bear interest at 12% per annum, both of which are payable quarterly in arrears.  At our election, we may pay interest either in cash or in-kind by increasing the outstanding principal amount of the total outstanding equity interestsapplicable notes.  The July 2023 convertible notes mature on July 14, 2028, and the December 2023 convertible notes mature on December 15, 2028 and January 11, 2029, depending on the issuance date of NoveCite, Inc.  Total consideration was $124.0 million, which consistedsuch notes, unless earlier converted or repurchased.  We may not redeem any of (a) $22.8 millionthe convertible notes prior to maturity.
At the option of the holder, the July 2023 convertible notes and the December 2023 convertible notes may be converted from time-to-time in cashwhole or in part into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of $2.86 per share and approximately$1.9194 per share, respectively, subject to customary adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalization and (b) approximately 7,022,000the like.  The convertible notes contain conversion limitations such that no conversion may be made if the aggregate number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the holder thereof would exceed 4.99%, 9.99% or 19.99% immediately after conversion thereof, subject to certain increases not in excess of either 9.99% or 19.99% at the option of the holder.
The convertible notes provide for customary events of default (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), which include, among others: nonpayment of principal or interest; breach of covenants or other agreements in the convertible notes; the occurrence of a material adverse effect event and certain events of bankruptcy. Generally, if an event of default occurs and is continuing under the termsconvertible notes, the holder thereof may require us to repurchase some or all of their convertible notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the Acquisition Agreement were valued at a totalprincipal amount of $102.0 million, based on athe convertible notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon.
In connection with the issuance of the December 2023 convertible notes, we agreed to reduce the exercise price of $14.5253the warrants we issued in a private placement in December 2022 to purchase an aggregate of approximately 4.4 million shares of our common stock from $3.28 to $1.43 per share and of the July 2023 warrants from $2.61 to $1.43 per share.

60
39

Merger with NTN Buzztime, Inc.

On March 25, 2021, we completed the Merger with NTN Buzztime, Inc. In accordance with the Merger Agreement, on March 25, 2021, Brooklyn amended its restated certificate of incorporation in order to effect:

prior to the Merger, a reverse stock split of its common stock, par value $0.005 per share, at a ratio of one-for-two; and
following the Merger, a change in its corporate name from “NTN Buzztime, Inc.” to “Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc.”

On March 26, 2021, we sold the rights, title and interest in and to the assets relating to the business operated under the name “NTN Buzztime, Inc.” prior to the Merger to eGames.com Holdings LLC, or eGames.com, in exchange for eGames.com’s payment of a purchase price of $2.0 million and assumption of specified liabilities relating to such pre-Merger business. This transaction, which we refer to as the Disposition, was completed in accordance with the terms of an asset purchase agreement dated September 18, 2020, as amended, between us and eGames.com.

The Merger has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Under this method of accounting, Brooklyn LLC was deemed the “acquiring” company and Brooklyn (then known as NTN Buzztime, Inc.) was treated as the “acquired” company for financial reporting purposes. Operations prior to the Merger are those of Brooklyn LLC, and the historical financial statements of Brooklyn LLC became the historical financial statements of Brooklyn with respect to periods prior to the completion of the Merger.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic

The development of our product candidates has been, and could continue to be, disrupted and materially adversely affected by past and continuing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is largely a result of measures imposed by the governments and hospitals in affected regions, businesses and schools were suspended due to quarantines intended to contain this outbreak. The spread of COVID-19 from China to other countries resulted in the Director General of the World Health Organization declaring COVID-19 a pandemic in March 2020. While the constraints of the pandemic are being lifted, we are still assessing the longer-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our development plans, and on the ability to conduct our clinical trials. COVID-19 could continue to disrupt production and cause delays in the supply and delivery of products used in our operations, may affect our operations, including the conduct of clinical studies, or the ability of regulatory bodies to grant approvals or supervise our candidates and products, may further divert the attention and efforts of the medical community to coping with the COVID-19 and disrupt the marketplace in which we operate and may have a material adverse effects on our operations. COVID-19 may also affect our employees and employees and operations at suppliers that may result in delays or disruptions in supply. In addition, a recession or market correction resulting from the spread of COVID-19 could materially affect our business and the value of our common stock. Additionally, if the COVID-19 pandemic has a significant impact on our business and financial results for an extended period of time, our liquidity and cash resources could be negatively impacted. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing global efforts to contain its spread will impact our operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain, and include the duration, severity and scope of the pandemic and the actions taken to contain or treat the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, the specific clinical outcomes, or future pandemic related impacts of emerging COVID-19 variants cannot be reliably predicted.

The patients in our clinical trials have conditions that make them especially vulnerable to COVID-19, and as a result we have seen slowdowns in enrollment in our clinical trials. While our INSPIRE trial in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity  is fully populated, our other clinical studies are likely to continue to encounter delays in enrollment as a result of the pandemic.

Basis of Presentation

RevenuesRevenue

Our near-term focus is on deploying our mRNA technology platform through strategic partnerships. We are not currently developing any product candidates. Our future revenue, if any, is primarily expected to come from out-licensing our mRNA technology platform and/or aspects thereof.
In February 2023, we entered into an exclusive option and license agreement with a development stage companythird party, under which we granted such third party an option to obtain an exclusive sublicense to certain of our technology for preclinical, clinical and have had no revenues from product salescommercial purposes in exchange for a non-refundable up-front payment to date.us of $0.3 million. In August 2023, that third party requested that we begin developing certain induced pluripotent stem cell lines in exchange for a cell line customization fee. The third party paid us $0.4 million towards the customization fee, which we are recognizing ratably over the customization period, which is expected to be approximately 20 to 25 months.  We will only earn the remaining amount of the customization fee if we make certain progress towards delivery of the customized cell line. We estimate the amount of consideration we expect to recognize as revenue that is not have revenuesprobable of having a significant reversal of such recognized revenue, and we place a constraint on the remaining contractual consideration. As it becomes evident that the constrained amounts are no longer at risk of a significant reversal of revenue, we will remove the constraint from product sales until such time asthe related revenue and recognize a cumulative catch-up adjustment to revenue in the period in which the constraint was removed. For additional information, see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
License Costs
We recognize certain license costs payable to Factor Limited under the exclusive license agreement we receive regulatory approval of our product candidates, successfully commercialize our products or enterentered into a licensing agreement which may include up-front licensing fees, of which there can be no assurance.with Factor Limited.

Research and Development Expenses

We expense our research and development costs as incurred. Our research and development expenses consist of costs incurred for company-sponsored research and development activities, as well as support for selected investigator-sponsored research. Upfront payments and milestone payments we make for the licensingin-licensing of technology are expensed as research and development in the period in which they are incurred if the technology is not expected to have any alternative future uses other than the specific research and development project for which it was intended. In-Process Research and Development (“IPR&D”) that is acquired through an asset acquisition and has no alternative future uses and, therefore, no separate economic values, is expensed to research and development costs at the time the costs are incurred.

The major components of research and development costs include salaries and employee benefits, stock-based compensation expense, supplies and materials, preclinical study costs, clinical manufacturing costs, clinical study and trial expenses, insurance coverage for clinical trials, expensed licensed technology, consulting, scientific advisors and other third-party costs, salaries and employee benefits, stock-based compensation expense, supplies and materials and allocations of various overhead costs related to our product development efforts. Research and development costs for the year ended December 31, 2022 also included expenses related to our former IRX-2 clinical trials as well as insurance coverage for the clinical trials.

In the normal course of our business, we contractWe have contracted with third parties to perform various clinical study and trial activities in the on-going development and testing of potential products.studies.  The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation and vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven payment flows. We accrue for third party expenses based on estimates of the services received and efforts expended during the reporting period.  If the actual timing of the performance of the services or the level of effort varies from the estimate, the accrual is adjusted accordingly.  The expenses for some third-party services may be recognized on a straight-line basis if the expected costs are expected to be incurred ratably during the period. Payments under the contracts depend on factors such as the achievement of certain events or milestones, the successful enrollment of patients, the allocation of responsibilities among the parties to the agreement, and the completion of portions of the clinical study or trial or similar conditions. Preclinical and clinical study and trial associated activities such as production and testing of clinical material require significant up-front expenditures. We anticipate paying significant portions of a study’s or trial’s cost before such begins and incurring additional expenditures as the study or trial progresses and reaches certain milestones.

General and Administrative Expenses

Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits and other costs, including equity-based compensation, for our executive and administrative personnel, legal and other professional fees, travel, insurance, and other corporate costs.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 20212023 and 20202022

 Years Ended December 31,   Change     % Change  
  2021  2020  
Operating expenses:            
Research and development $
12,705,000
  $
3,951,000
  $
8,754,000
  $
222
%
Acquired in-process research and development  
80,538,000
   
-
   
80,538,000
   
N/A
 
General and administrative  
14,724,000
   
3,297,000
   
11,427,000
   
347
%
Transaction costs  
5,765,000
   
-
   
5,765,000
   
N/A
 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  
(180,000
)
  
19,240,000
   
(19,420,000
)
  
-101
%
Total operating expenses  
113,552,000
   
26,488,000
   
87,064,000
   
329
%
                 
Loss from operations  
(113,552,000
)
  
(26,488,000
)
  
(87,064,000
)
  
329
%
                 
Other expenses:                
Loss on sale of NTN assets  
(9,648,000
)
  
-
   
(9,648,000
)
  
N/A
 
Other income (expense), net  
899,000
   
(43,000
)
  
942,000
   
-2191
%
Total other expense  
(8,749,000
)
  
(43,000
)
  
(8,706,000
)
  
20247
%
Loss before income taxes  
(122,301,000
)
  
(26,531,000
)
  
(95,770,000
)
  
361
%
Provision for income taxes  
(5,000
)
  -   
(5,000
)
  
N/A
 
                 
Net loss  
(122,306,000
)
  
(26,531,000
)
  
(95,775,000
)
  
361
%
                 
Series A preferred stock dividend  
(16,000
)
  
-
   
(16,000
)
  
N/A
 
                 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders 
$
(122,322,000
)
 
$
(26,531,000
)
 
$
(95,791,000
)
  
361
%
  Years ended December 31,    
(in thousands) 2023  2022  Change 
Revenue 
$
68
  
$
-
  
$
68
 
Cost of revenues  
236
   
-
   
236
 
Gross loss  
(168
)
  
-
   
(168
)
             
Operating expenses:            
Research and development  
5,920
   
10,392
   
(4,472
)
General and administrative  
14,587
   
16,835
   
(2,248
)
Acquisition of Exacis IPR&D  
460
   
-
   
460
 
Impairment of IRX-2 IPR&D  
-
   
5,990
   
(5,990
)
Total operating expenses  
20,967
   
33,217
   
(12,250
)
             
Loss from operations  
(21,135
)
  
(33,217
)
  
12,082
 
             
Other expense, net:            
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities  
215
   
10,795
   
(10,580
)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  
118
   
-
   
118
 
Loss on non-controlling investment  
(59
)
  
(941
)
  
882
 
Interest income
  138   -   138 
Interest expense
  (614)
  (30)
  (584)
Other expense, net  (334
)
  
(1,141
)
  807 
Total other (expense) income, net  
(536
)
  
8,683
   
(9,219
)
             
Loss before income taxes  
(21,671
)
  
(24,534
)
  
2,863
 
Benefit (provision) for income taxes  
3
   
(45
)
  
48
 
             
Net loss 
$
(21,668
)
 
$
(24,579
)
 
$
2,911
 

Revenue
During the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized revenue related to the cell line customization activities we performed for a third party.  We did not perform any such activities, or otherwise recognize any revenue, during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Cost of Revenue
During the year ended December 31, 2023, our cost of revenues includes direct labor and materials to perform the customization cell line activities for a third party, as well as royalty expense owed to Factor Limited in accordance with our exclusive license agreement with Factor Limited.  There were no comparable expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Research and Development Expenses
  Years ended December 31, 
  2023  2022  Change 
(in thousands)         
License and MSA expense 
$
3,250
  
$
4,761
  
$
(1,511
)
Payroll-related  
701
   
2,426
   
(1,725
)
Stock-based compensation  
234
   
1,249
   
(1,015
)
Clinical  
74
   
1,047
   
(973
)
Professional fees  
810
   
312
   
498
 
Other expenses, net  
851
   
597
   
254
 
Total research and development expenses 
$
5,920
  
$
10,392
  
$
(4,472
)

  Years Ended December 31
 
 
 2021  2020  Change  % Change 
License fees 
$
6,500,000
  
$
-
  
$
6,500,000
   
N/A
 
Stock-based compensation  
1,597,000
   
-
   
1,597,000
   
N/A
 
Clinical trials  
1,292,000
   
412,000
   
880,000
   
214
%
Payroll-related  
2,342,000
   
1,985,000
   
357,000
   
18
%
Other expenses, net  
974,000
   
1,554,000
   
(580,000
)
  
-37
%
Total research and development expenses 
$
12,705,000
  
$
3,951,000
  
$
8,754,000
   
222
%
Total research and development expenses decreased by approximately $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022 primarily due to (a) decreased expenses under our master services agreement (“MSA”) with Factor Bioscience during 2023 and (b) decreased payroll expense and stock-based compensation expense due to employee terminations and a reduction in clinical trial expense as a result of our clinical trial ending in 2022, partially offset by (i) a full year of fees paid to Factor Bioscience under the MSA during 2023 and (ii) an increase in professional fees in 2023 related to consulting activities.
General and Administrative Expenses
  Years ended December 31, 
  2023  2022  Change 
(in thousands)         
Professional fees 
$
6,464
  
$
8,499
  
$
(2,035
)
Payroll-related  
2,045
   
2,942
   
(897
)
Insurance  
1,140
   
1,951
   
(811
)
Stock-based compensation  
1,008
   
1,686
   
(678
)
Loss on disposal or sale of fixed assets  
1
   
280
   
(279
)
Occupany expense  
3,306
   
640
   
2,666
 
Other expenses, net  
623
   
837
   
(214
)
Total general and administrative expenses 
$
14,587
  
$
16,835
  
$
(2,248
)

Our general and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $2.2  million for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022 primarily due to (a) decreases in professional fees resulting from less legal and consulting fees, (b) decreases in payroll expense and stock-based compensation expense resulting from lower headcount, (c) a reduction in insurance premiums and (d) a reduction in the loss on disposal of fixed assets.  These decreases were offset by increased occupancy expenses as a result of the June 2023 rent commencement date for our Somerville lease and the recognition of the related rent expense.
We expect our occupancy expenses to increase substantially in 2024 compared to 2023 due to our payment obligations under our sublease for office and laboratory space in Somerville, Massachusetts.  The term of the sublease is approximately 10 years, and our base rent obligations over the term is estimated to be approximately $63.0 million, plus our share of the sublessor’s parking spaces and operating expenses.
Acquisition of Exacis In-Process Research and Development
We acquired from Exacis Biotherapeutics Inc. (“Exacis”) substantially all of its intellectual property assets, including all of its right, title and interest in and to an exclusive license agreement by and between Exacis and Factor Limited (the “Purchased License”).  The Purchased License was determined to be an IPR&D asset that has no alternative future use and no separate economic value from its original intended purpose, which is expensed in the period the cost is incurred.  As a result, we expensed the fair value of the Purchased License of approximately $0.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2023. For additional information, see Note 4 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements included in this report.
Impairment of In-Process Research and Development
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we received the results from the INSPIRE phase 2 trial of IRX-2. Despite outcomes that favored IRX-2 in certain predefined subgroups, the trial did not meet its primary endpoint of event-free survival at two years of follow up.  Based on the totality of available information, following receipt of the results described above we determined we would not further develop IRX-2 and that the carrying value of the IPR&D asset was impaired.  Accordingly, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of approximately $6.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2022, which reduced the value of this asset to zero.
Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liabilities
For the year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we recognized credits to expense related to the change in the fair value of warrant liabilities due to a decrease in the market price of our common stock.
Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration
On the closing date of our acquisition of the intellectual property assets of Exacis, we recognized a contingent consideration liability of $0.2 million for future payments that may be payable to Exacis, which was included as part of the $0.5 million fair value of the Purchased License and expensed as IPR&D for the year ended December 31, 2023.  We remeasured the fair value of the contingent consideration liability at the end of each quarterly period enduring the year, and for the year ended December 31, 2023, the change in fair value was approximately $0.1 million, which is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations.  There were no contingent consideration liabilities during the same period in 2022.
Loss on Non-Controlling Investment
We account for our 25% non-controlling investment in NoveCite, Inc. (“NoveCite”) under the equity method.  We have not guaranteed any obligations of NoveCite, nor are we otherwise committed to providing further financial support for NoveCite.  Therefore, we only record 25% of NoveCite’s losses up to our investment carrying amount of $1.0 million.  For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we recognized losses of approximately $0.1 million and $0.9 million, and as of December 31, 2023, the carrying value of our initial investment is zero.
Interest Income
We recognized interest income for the year ended December 31, 2023 due to depositing our cash into interest bearing accounts compared to the same period in 2022.

Interest Expense
We recognized an increase in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 primarily due to interest related to the convertible notes of approximately $0.3 million as well as the amortization of the debt discount and debt issuance costs associated with the convertible note financings.  There were no convertible notes for the same period in 2022.
Other (Expense) Income, Net
  Years ended December 31, 
  2023  2022  Change 
(in thousands)         
SEPA fees 
$
(280
)
 
$
-
  
$
(280
)
Q1-22 PIPE transaction fees  
-
   
(1,007
)
  
1,007
 
Liquidated damages  
-
   
(240
)
  
240
 
Other (expense) income, net  
(54
)
  
106
   
(160
)
Total other expense, net 
$
(334
)
 
$
(1,141
)
 
$
807 

For the year ended December 31, 2021, our research2023, we recognized (a) commitment fees and development expenses increased by approximately $8.75 million fromother fees related to the year ended December 31, 2020 due to upfront payments associatedSEPA we entered into with licensed technology, which were expensed because there is no future alternative use for the licensed technologyLincoln Park in April 2023 and (b) other than for the intended purpose, increased clinical trial expenses, increased headcount and increased stock-based compensation when compared to 2020.

Acquired IPR&D

miscellaneous expense. During the year ended December 31, 2021,2022, we expensed the approximately $80.5 million fair value of the IPR&D acquired in the Acquisition because there is no future alternative use for the IPR&D other than for its intended purpose.

General and Administrative Expenses

  Years Ended December 31
 
  2021  2020  Change  % Change 
Professional fees 
$
7,351,000
  
$
2,352,000
  
$
4,999,000
   
213
%
Stock-based compensation  
3,638,000
   
91,000
   
3,547,000
   
3898
%
Payroll-related  
1,299,000
   
(98,000
)
  
1,397,000
   
-1426
%
Insurance  
1,134,000
   
122,000
   
1,012,000
   
830
%
Other expenses, net  
1,302,000
   
830,000
   
472,000
   
57
%
Total general and administrative expenses 
$
14,724,000
  
$
3,297,000
  
$
11,427,000
   
347
%

The $11.42 million increase in general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 from the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily related to increased professional fees such as legal, accounting and consulting fees associated with mergera private placement we completed in the first quarter of 2022, as all of the fees incurred were allocated to the warrants issued in connection with such transaction, and acquisition activity, includingwe incurred a loss for liquidated damages under a registration rights agreement we entered into with investors in the Merger and the Acquisition, as well as costs associated with becoming a publicly traded company, increased stock-based compensationprivate placement resulting from the issuance of equity awards, increased payroll-related expense due to an increase innot timely filing our headcount and increased insurance expenses when compared to 2020.

Transaction Costs

For the year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred approximately $5.8 million in transaction costs related to the issuance of common stock to Brooklyn LLC’s financial advisor upon consummation of the Merger, and there were no comparable transaction costsQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the yearquarterly period ended DecemberMarch 31, 2020.2022.

Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration

As of December 31, 2020, our contingent consideration liability was approximately $20.1 million and  related to royalties we would be obligated to pay under certain IRX-2 license agreements based on future revenues from any future IRX-2 product sales. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the change in fair value of the contingent consideration was a decrease to the liability of $180,000, based on our third-party valuation analysis.

Loss on Sales of NTN Assets

The approximately $9.6 million loss on the sale of NTN assets during the year ended December 31, 2021 was incurred upon completion of the Disposition, and there was no comparable loss on sale for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Other Income (Expense), Net

 Years Ended December 31
 
  2021  2020  Change  % Change 
Employer retention tax credit 
$
664,000
     
$
664,000
   
N/A
 
Income from Brooklyn PPP loan forgiveness  
310,000
   
-
   
310,000
   
N/A
 
Other expenses, net  
(1,000
)
  
-
   
(1,000
)
  
N/A
 
Interest expense, net  
(74,000
)
  
(43,000
)
  
(31,000
)
  
72
%
Total other income (expense), net 
$
899,000
  
$
(43,000
)
 
$
942,000
   
-2191
%

During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized an increase in other income, net of expense of $899,000, as compared to other expense of $43,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily as a result of a withholding tax refund related to the employer retention tax credit under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration, or the CARES Act, and the forgiveness of Brooklyn LLC’s Paycheck Protection Program loan, or the PPP Loan, which was primarily offset by interest accrued on notes payable that we assumed as part of the acquisition of the assets of IRX Therapeutics, LLC in 2018. Such notes bore interest at the rate of 14% and matured on December 31, 2021, on which date the Company repaid such notes in full, including all accrued and unpaid interest thereon.

Provision for Income Taxes

Our income tax provision is forDuring 2023, we expect to incur state income tax liabilities related to our U.S. operations.  At December 31, 2021 and 2020 we had available net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $20,679,000 and $0 for federal income tax purposes, respectively, of which $20,679,000 can be carried forward indefinitely. We have available $1,397,000 and $747,000 state NOLs for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.  We also have foreign NOL carryforwards of $4,759,000 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, which carry forward indefinitely. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) imposes limits on the ability to use NOL carryforwards that existed prior to a change in control to offset future taxable income. Such limitations would reduce, potentially significantly, the gross deferred tax assets disclosed in the table above related to the NOL carryforwards.  We continue to disclose the NOL carryforwards at their original amount in the table above as no potential limitation has been quantified. We have also established a full valuation allowance for all deferred tax assets, including the NOLour net operating loss carryforwards, since we could not conclude that we were more likely than not able to generate future taxable income to realize these assets.
The effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate due primarily to our full valuation allowance.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2021,2023, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $17.0 million. During the second quarter$11.7 million, of 2021, we entered into Purchase Agreements with Lincoln Park, pursuant to which we have the right, but not the obligation, to sell to Lincoln Park,approximately $4.1 million was restricted cash (see —Material Cash Requirements—Somerville Sublease, below) and Lincoln Park is obligated to purchase up to an aggregate of $60.0 million in shares of our common stock. Future sales of common stock by us, if any, are subject to certain limitations, and may occur from time to time, at our sole discretion. As of April 12, 2022, we had issued and sold approximately 3,552,000 shares of common stock for total gross proceeds of $54.1 million and net proceeds of $52.0 million. For further information, see “—Recent Developments—Purchase Agreements.” On March 9, 2022, we consummated the PIPE Transaction, resulting in net proceedsaccumulated deficit of approximately $11$187.0 million. see “—Recent Developments—PIPE Transaction.”   Pursuant to the purchase agreement entered into in respect of the PIPE Transaction, we are prohibited from issuing equity under the Purchase Agreements for a period of one-year following consummation of the PIPE Transaction.

We have to date incurred operating losses, and we expect these losses to increasecontinue in the future asfuture. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we expand our product development programs and operate asincurred a publicly traded company.  Developing product candidates, conducting clinical trials and commercializing products are expensive,net loss of $21.7 million, and we will need to raise substantial additional funds to achieveused $20.4 million in operating activities.
Currently, our strategic objectives. It will likely be some years before we obtain the necessary regulatory approvals to commercialize one or moresole source of liquidity is through sales of our product candidates. common stock under the standby equity purchase agreement (the “SEPA”) we entered into with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”) in April 2023, pursuant to which Lincoln Park committed to purchase up to $10.0 million of our common stock. Such sales of common stock by us, if any, are subject to certain conditions and limitations set forth in the SEPA, including a condition that we may not direct Lincoln Park to purchase any shares of common stock under the SEPA if such purchase would result in Lincoln Park beneficially owning more than 4.99% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Sales under the SEPA may occur from time to time, at our sole discretion, through April 2025.  To date, we have issued and sold approximately 214,000 shares of our common stock to Lincoln Park, including the 74,000 commitment shares, and have received approximately $0.3 million in gross proceeds from such sales.
Based on our current financial condition and forecasts of available cash, including as mentioned above, we believe we dowill not have sufficient fundscapital to fund our operations for the next twelve12 months fromfollowing the filingissuance date of the accompanying consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Therestatements. We can beprovide no assurance that we will ever be inable to obtain additional capital when needed, on favorable terms, or at all. If we cannot raise capital when needed, on favorable terms or at all, we will need to reevaluate our planned operations and may need to reduce expenses, file for bankruptcy, reorganize, merge with another entity, or cease operations. If we become unable to continue as a position to commercialize IRX-2 or any other product candidategoing concern, we may acquire,have to liquidate our assets, and might realize significantly less than the values at which they are carried on our financial statements, and stockholders may lose all or thatpart of their investment in our common stock. See the risk factor in Item 1A of Part II of this report titled, “We will require substantial additional capital to fund our operations, and if we willfail to obtain any additionalthe necessary financing, that we require inmay not be able to pursue our business strategy.”
Historically, the future or, even if such financing is available, that it will be obtainable on terms acceptablecash used to us.

In that regard,fund our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including:

the scope, rateoperations has come from a variety of progresssources and costpredominantly from sales of shares of our clinical trialscommon stock and other product development activities;

future clinical trial results;

the termsof convertible notes. We will continue to evaluate and timing of any collaborative, licensing and other agreements that we may establish;

the cost and timing of regulatory approvals;

the cost and delays in product development as a result of any changes in regulatory oversight applicable to our products;

the cost and timing of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities;

the effect of competition and market developments; and

the cost of filing and potentially prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights.

We plan to raise additional funds to support our product development activities and working capital requirementsneeds through the remaining availability under the Second Purchase Agreement (to the extent we are permitted to use such agreement), public or private equity offerings, debt financings, corporate collaborationsstrategic partnerships, out-licensing our intellectual property or other means. We may also seek governmental grants to support our clinical trials and preclinical trials. Further, we may seek to raise capital to fund additional product development efforts even if we have sufficient funds for our planned operations. Any sale by us of additional equity or convertible debt securities could result in dilution to our stockholders. There can be no assurance that any such required additional fundingcapital will be available when needed or that, if available, it will be obtained on terms favorable to us at alland our stockholders. Our ability to raise capital through sales of our common stock will depend on a variety of factors including, among others, market conditions, the trading price and volume of our common stock, and investor sentiment. In addition, macroeconomic factors and volatility in the financial market, which may be exacerbated in the short term by concerns over inflation, interest rates, impacts of the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, strained relations between the U.S. and several other countries, and social and political discord and unrest in the U.S., among other things, may make equity or availabledebt financings more difficult, more costly or more dilutive to our stockholders.
In addition, equity or debt financings may have a dilutive effect on terms acceptablethe holdings of our existing stockholders, and debt financings may subject us to us.

Further, to the extent thatrestrictive covenants, operational restrictions and security interests in our assets. If we raise additional fundscapital through collaborative arrangements, itwe may be necessaryrequired to relinquish some rights to our technologies or grant sublicenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If
We prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements on a going concern basis, which assumes that we will realize our assets and satisfy our liabilities in the normal course of business. As discussed above, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern because we do not have sufficient cash to satisfy our working capital needs and other liquidity requirements over at least the next 12 months from the date of issuance of the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and reclassification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result from the outcome of the uncertainty of our ability to remain a going concern.
In addition, while we are not able to secure additional funding when needed,presently pursuing product development, we may havedo so in the future.  Developing product candidates, conducting clinical trials and commercializing products requires substantial capital, and we would need to delayraise substantial additional funds if we were to pursue the commercializedevelopment of our products, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more researchproduct candidates.
Cash Flows
Cash flows from operating, investing and development programs, which could havefinancing activities, as reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows, are summarized as follows:
  For the years ended
December 31,
    
(in thousands) 2023  2022  Change 
Cash (used in) provided by:         
Operating activities 
$
(20,408
)
 
$
(20,976
)
 
$
568
 
Investing activities  
(19
)
  
(47
)
  
28
 
Financing activities  
16,556
   
19,579
   
(3,023
)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents 
$
(3,871
)
 
$
(1,444
)
 
$
(2,427
)

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
There was an adverseincrease of approximately $0.6 million in cash used in operating activities for the year ended December, 2023, as compared to year ended December 31, 2022.  This change was due to an increase in cash used in operating assets and liabilities of $5.5 million, primarily related to MSA fees, insurance premiums and accrued severance payments, offset by a $6.1 million decrease in net loss, after giving effect on our business.to adjustments made for non-cash transactions, for the year ended December 31, 2023 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2022.


Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
Equity Securities

Total cash used in investing activities remained relatively flat for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to 2022.  Purchases of property and equipment decreased by $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to 2022, which was offset by a decrease in proceeds received from the sale of fixed assets of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to 2022.
On March 6,
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 includes approximately $16.3 million in net proceeds received from convertible note financings and approximately $0.3 million in net proceeds received under the SEPA. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 includes approximately $19.6 million in net proceeds received from capital raising transactions.
Material Cash Requirements
Somerville Sublease
In October 2022, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement withsublease for approximately 45,500 square feet of office and laboratory space in Somerville, Massachusetts.  The term of the PIPE Investor providing forsublease is approximately 10 years, and our base rent obligations over the private placement (the “PIPE Transaction”)term is estimated to the PIPE Investor ofbe approximately 6,857,000 Units, each of which consisted of (i) one$63.0 million, plus our share of our common stock (or, in lieu thereof, one Pre-Funded Warrant)the sublessor’s parking spaces and (ii) one Common Warrant, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $11 million. The PIPE Transaction closed on March 9, 2022. see “—Recent Developments—PIPE Transaction.”

On April 26, 2021, we and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC, or Lincoln Park, executed the First Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which we had the right, but not the obligation, to sell to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park would be obligated to purchase, up to $20.0 million of shares of Brooklyn’s common stock, subject to certain limitations. In consideration for Lincoln Park’s entry into the First Purchase Agreement, we issued Lincoln Park approximately 56,000 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2021, we issued and sold to Lincoln Park approximately 1,128,000 shares of common stockoperating expenses. Our base rent obligations under the First Purchase Agreement for gross proceeds of $20.0sublease during 2024 are expected to be $0.5 million and no further shares may be sold to Lincoln Park under the First Purchase Agreement.

On May 26, 2021, we and Lincoln Park executed the Second Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which we have the right from time to time, but not the obligation, to sell to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park would be obligated to purchase, up to $40.0 million of shares of Brooklyn’s common stock, subject to certain limitations. In consideration of Lincoln Park’s entry into the Second Purchase Agreement, we issued to Lincoln Park 50,000 shares of common stock.per month. As of December 31, 2021, Brooklyn had issued and sold approximately 2,424,000 shares of common stock under the Second Purchase Agreement for total gross proceeds of $34.1 million.   Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement in respectpart of the PIPE Transaction,sublease, we may not effect transactions underdelivered a security deposit in the Second Purchase Agreement for a period of one year immediately following closing of the PIPE Transaction.

For further information on the Purchase Agreements, see “—Recent Developments—Purchase Agreements.”

As a condition to the closing of the Merger, Brooklyn LLC was required to have at least $10.0 million in cash and cash equivalents at the effective time of the Merger. In furtherance of, and prior to, the Merger, certain of its members entered into agreements pursuant to which those members purchased additional units of Brooklyn LLC for an aggregate purchase price of $10.5 million.

Disposition.

On March 26, 2021, we completed the Disposition, in which we sold to eGames.com our rights, title and interest in and to the assets relating to the business we operated prior to the Merger under the name “NTN Buzztime, Inc.” in exchange for eGames.com’s paymentform of a purchase priceletter of $2.0 million and assumption of specified liabilities relating to such pre-Merger business.

Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan.

On May 4, 2020, Brooklyn LLC issued a notecredit in the principal amount of approximately $310,000 to Silicon Valley Bank evidencing the loan, or the Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan, Brooklyn LLC received under the Paycheck Protection Program, or PPP, of the CARES Act administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration. Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan had an interest rate of 1.0% per annum.

Under the terms of the CARES Act, certain amounts of the Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan could be forgiven if they were used for qualifying expenses as described in the CARES Act. In June 2021, Brooklyn LLC submitted its loan forgiveness application for the Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan, and in September 2021, the lender informed Brooklyn LLC that the U.S Small Business Administration had approved the forgiveness of 100% of the outstanding principal and interest of the Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan. As of December 31, 2021, there was no outstanding principal balance under the Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan.

Uses of Funds

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities.

Our operations used $23.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. Our cash use for operating activities is influenced by the level of our net loss and the amount of $4.1 million, which will be reduced on an incremental basis throughout the term of the sublease.  The letter of credit was issued by our commercial bank, which required that we cash we investcollateralize the letter of credit with $4.1 million of cash deposited in personnel and technology development to support anticipated growtha restricted account maintained by such bank.  The amount of required restricted cash collateral will decline in our business.

License Obligations.

We are obligated to pay certain amounts to Factor pursuant toparallel with the license agreement we entered into in April 2021, including $2.5 million in October 2021, which was paid, and $3.5 million in October 2022.  The license agreement also provides for milestone payments and royalties on the net sale of product developed under the license agreement.

Lease Obligations.

We are obligated to pay approximately $750,000 per year for our facilities leases, subject to annual increases and to a sharing of common area expenses with other tenantsreduction in the building. The leases expire at varying times between December 2026 and June 2028.

Acquisition.

On July 16, 2021, we used approximately $22,882,000 of cash as partial consideration for the Acquisition, and we issued common stock valued at a total of $102.0 million, based on a price of $14.5253 per share, for the remaining portionamount of the Acquisition’s purchase price.letter of credit over the term of the sublease.

Brooklyn PPP Loan.Convertible Notes

On April 18, 2020, Brooklyn (then known as NTN Buzztime, Inc.) was granted a loan, which we refer to as
As of the Brooklyn PPP Loan, indate of this report, the aggregate amount outstanding under our convertible notes, including accrued interest, is $18.2 million, of $1,625,000, pursuantwhich $9.0 million and $9.2 million relates to the PPP underJuly 2023 convertible notes and the CARES Act. UnderDecember 2023 convertible notes, respectively. The July 2023 convertible notes mature on July 14, 2028, and the termsDecember 2023 convertible notes mature on December 15, 2028 and January 11, 2029, depending on the issuance date of such notes, unless earlier converted or repurchased.  We may not redeem any of the PPP, certain amounts ofconvertible notes prior to maturity.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have during the Brooklyn PPP Loan could be forgiven if they were used for qualifying expensesperiods presented, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as described in the CARES Act. In October 2020 the U.S. Small Business Administration approved the forgiveness of $1,093,000 of the $1,625,000 principal amount of the Brooklyn PPP Loan, leaving a principal balance of approximately $532,000, all of which, plus accrued and unpaid interest, was due and, in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, paid by Brooklyn upon the closing of the Merger.defined under applicable SEC rules.

Critical Accounting Estimates
 
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. We continually evaluate our judgments, estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on the terms of underlying agreements, our expected course of development, historical experience and other factors we believe are reasonable based on the circumstances, the results of which form our management’s basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe the following critical accounting estimates affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Use of EstimatesGoodwill Impairment

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (a) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities; (b) disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements; (c) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period and (d) the reported amount of the fair value of assets acquired in connection with business combinations. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Our significant estimates and assumptions include the recoverability and useful lives of long-lived assets and the contingent consideration liability.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in the acquisition of IRX Therapeutics, Inc. in November 2018, (the “IRX Acquisition”), which was accounted for as a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Since management evaluates Brooklyn as a single reporting unit, goodwill is tested for impairment at the entity level by first performing a qualitative assessment to determine whetherindicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of the entitya reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Such qualitative factorsEvents that would indicate impairment and trigger an interim impairment assessment include, but are not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance and other relevant events.  IfManagement evaluates our company as a single reporting unit, therefore, our goodwill is tested for impairment at the entity does not pass thelevel. Goodwill is tested for impairment as of December 31st of each year, or more frequently as warranted by events or changes in circumstances mentioned above.  Accounting guidance also permits an optional qualitative assessment then the entity’s carrying valuefor goodwill to determine whether it is compared to its fair value. Goodwill is considered impaired ifmore likely than not that the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. If, after this qualitative assessment, we determine that it is not more likely than not that the entityfair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then no further quantitative testing would be necessary. A quantitative assessment is performed if the qualitative assessment results in a more likely than not determination or if a qualitative assessment is not performed. The quantitative assessment considers whether the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, in which case an impairment charge is recorded to the extent the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value.

ImpairmentContingent Consideration
Contingent consideration from an asset acquisition that is indexed to or settled in shares of Long-Lived Assets

We review long-lived assetsour common stock and certain identifiable assets for impairment whenever circumstancesthat is classified as a liability is initially measured at fair value, with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in earnings.  Measuring the fair value requires various inputs, and situationsa significant change such that there is an indication thatin one or more of these inputs used in the carrying amounts may not be recovered. An impairment exists when the carrying valuecalculation of the long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between willing market participants. A fair value hierarchy has been established for valuation inputs that gives the highest prioritymay cause a significant change to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1 Inputs – Valued based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs – Valued based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 Inputs – Valued based on inputs for which there is little or no market value, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The carrying amounts reported on the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid assets and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, other current liabilities and other liabilities approximate fair value based due to their short maturities. The carrying value of loans payable approximates its fair market value because the effective yield on this debt, which includes contractual interest rates as well as other finance charges, is comparable to rates of returns for instruments of similar credit risk.

Commitment and Contingencies

We follow ASC No.450-20, Loss Contingencies, to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

Stock-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for equity awards granted to employees, directors and certain consultants. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair valuecontingent consideration liability, which could also result in material non-cash gains or losses being reported in the Company’s consolidated statement of stock options granted is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. Stock-based compensation expense for share-based payment awards is recognized using the straight-line single-option method.operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2021,June 2022, the Financial Accounting StandardsStandard Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2022-03, 2021-04, Earnings Per ShareFair Value Measurement (Topic 260), Debt—Modifications820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions (“ASU 2022-03”). The FASB issued ASU 2022-03 to (1) clarify the guidance in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, when measuring the fair value of an equity security subject to contractual restrictions that prohibit the sale of an equity security, (2) to amend a related illustrative example, and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718),(3) to introduce new disclosure requirements for equity related securities subject to contractual sale restrictions that are measured at fair value in accordance with Topic 820. ASU 2022-03 clarifies that a contractual restriction on the sale of an equity security is not considered part of the unit of account of the equity security and, Derivatives and Hedging—Contractstherefore, is not considered in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options. ASU 2021-04 addresses the accounting for certain modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options. ASU 2021-04measuring fair value. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021 (January 1, 2022 for us)2023, and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a significantmaterial impact on our consolidated financial statements.statements as a result of adopting this ASU.

In July 2021,October 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2021-05,No. 2023-06, Leases (Topic 842)Disclosure ImprovementsLessors - Certain LeasesCodification Amendment in Response to the SEC’s Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative. This ASU modified the disclosure and presentation requirements of a variety of codification topics by aligning them with Variable Lease Payments, which amends the lessor classification guidanceSEC’s regulations.  The amendments to introduce additional criteria when classifying leases with variable lease payments thatthe various topics should be applied prospectively, and the effective date will be determined for each individual disclosure based on the effective date of the SEC’s removal of the related disclosure.  If the SEC has not removed the applicable requirements from Regulation S-X or Regulation S-K by June 30, 2027, then this ASU will not become effective.  Early adoption is prohibited.  We do not dependexpect the amendments in this ASU to have a material impact on a reference index or a rate. This guidanceour consolidated financial statements.
In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, Segment Reporting – Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, which provides updates to qualitative and quantitative reportable segment disclosure requirements, including enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses and increased interim disclosure requirements, among others. ASU No. 2023-07 is effective for annual periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021 (January 1, 20222023, and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted, and the amendments should be applied retrospectively. We do not expect the amendments in this ASU to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires disclosure of disaggregated income taxes paid, prescribes standard categories for us),the components of the effective tax rate reconciliation, and modifies other income tax-related disclosures. ASU No. 2023-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 and allows for adoption on a prospective basis, with earlya retrospective option. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption ofamendments in this updateASU to have a significantmaterial impact on itsour consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
Under SEC rules and regulations, as a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide the information otherwise required by this item.

ITEM 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” on page F-1 for a listing of the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.report.
 
ITEM 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.
 
ITEM 9A.Controls and Procedures
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed pursuant to the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and we were required to apply our judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. We have carried out an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the supervision, and with the participation, of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and President (who serves as our principal executive officer) and our Senior Vice President of Finance (who serves as our principal financial officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.
 
Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K in providing reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives due primarily to athe material weakness discussed below.
 
Management’s Report onPlan for Remediation of Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
 
UnderWe were unable to timely file our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the supervision andquarterly period ended March 31, 2022 with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Vice President of Finance, we conduct an annual evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the guidelines established by the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. If management identifies any material weaknessSEC due to identifying errors in the course of that evaluation, management cannot conclude that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective.  A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Upon completion of the Merger in March 2021 and the resulting change in our business model and strategy, we experienced a complete turnover of our employees, including all of the members of our executive management team, which resulted in, among other things, our having insufficient accounting staff available to enable and ensure adequate segregation of duties and our lacking appropriate and complete documentation of policies and procedures critical to the accomplishment of financial reporting objectives. The accounting personnel and documentation deficiencies each increase the risk that a material misstatement of our financial statements will not be prevented or detectedreported in our Annual Report on a timely basis. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and President and our Vice President of Finance concluded that, as ofForm 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 during our disclosure controlspreparation of the financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2022. Management concluded that the errors were the result of accounting personnel’s lack of technical proficiency in complex matters. On June 30, 2022, we filed an amendment to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2021 and procedures were not effective2020 to correct the errors in our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 and did not provide reasonable assurance of achieving2020 and for the desired control objectives.quarters ended June 30, 2020, September 30, 2020, March 31, 2021, June 30, 2021 and September 30, 2021.

Management’s Plan for Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management plans to implementhas implemented measures designed to ensure that the deficiencies contributing to the ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and proceduresinternal control over financial reporting are promptly remediated, such that the internal controls and procedures are designed, implemented and operating effectively. The remediation actions plannedto date include:

hiring
enhancing the business process controls related to reviews over technical, complex, and non-recurring transactions;
providing additional training to accounting personnel in a number,personnel; and with experience,
using an external accounting advisor to allow for proper segregation of duties;review management’s conclusions on technical, complex and non-recurring matters.

developing
The material weakness cannot be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and implementing,management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.  As of December 31, 2023, we continue to season and then monitoringenhance such controls to ensure that they will continue to operate effectively for a sufficient period of time before management can make conclusions on the effectiveness of, written policies and procedures required to achieve our financial reporting objectives in a timely manner, including policies and procedures relating to internal control over financial reporting.operating effectiveness.

We are committed to developing a strong internal control environment, and we believe the remediation efforts that we have implemented and will implement will result in significant improvements in our control environment. We hired our Vice President of Finance in the second quarter of 2021 to oversee all accounting and financial reporting matters, including implementing a framework for internal controls over financial reporting, and we hired a full-time controller at the beginning of 2022. Also, during the fourth quarter of 2021, we engaged a third-party consulting firm with expertise in implementing the framework for internal controls over financial reporting, and we currently developing this framework. Our management will continue to monitor and evaluate the relevance of our risk-based approach and the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and is committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Other than
Except for the actions intended to remediate the material weakness as described above, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
ITEM 9B.Other Information
 
Not Applicable.
During the period from October 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023, none of our executive officers or directors adopted or terminated contracts, instructions or written plans for the purchase or sale of our securities.

ITEM 9C.Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
 
Not Applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

DIRECTORS & EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The names of our directors and executive officers and their respective ages, positions, biographies and, in the case of directors, their qualifications to serve as directors, are set forth below as of March 12, 2024.

Name
Age
Position(1)
Sanjeev Luther
62
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
Dorothy Clarke
59
General Counsel and Director
Sandra Gurrola
56
Senior Vice President, Finance
James Bristol
77
Chairman of the Board
Peter Cicala
62
Director
William Wexler
64
Director

Sanjeev Luther has served as President, Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors since January 1, 2024. Prior to that, Mr. Luther served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a board member of Cornerstone Pharmaceuticals from November 2017 to December 2023 and as its Chief Operations Officer and Chief Business Officer from December 2014 to November 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Luther served in various leadership roles at Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Bausch and Lomb and GE Healthcare.  Mr. Luther holds an MBA in Marketing and a B.S. in Marketing and Business Administration from the State University of New York at Buffalo.

Mr. Luther’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his expertise in the healthcare industry, his business training and education, and his extensive experience managing life science companies.

Dorothy Clarke has served as our General Counsel since January 1, 2024 and as a member of our Board of Directors since August 28, 2023. From April 2002 until November 2022, Ms. Clarke worked at Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”), serving in various roles, including in the law department as a regulatory attorney for pharmaceutical, medical device and consumer businesses, a vice president of law and vice president of regulatory affairs in the medical devices sector, the chief privacy officer of J&J, and a vice president of health care compliance for medical devices and for research and development functions. Since November 2023, Ms. Clarke also serves as a board member of Comera Life Sciences.  Ms. Clarke received a B.A. in history from Wesleyan University and a J.D. from the New York University School of Law.
Ms. Clarke’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her expertise in the healthcare industry, risk management, regulatory affairs and compliance.
Sandra Gurrola has served as our Senior Vice President of Finance since May 2023 and as our Vice President of Finance from June 2021 until May 2023. Prior to that, she served as the Senior Vice President of eGames.com Holdings, LLC from March 2021 to June 2021 and as a consultant to us. Ms. Gurrola served as Senior Vice President of Finance to NTN Buzztime, Inc. from September 2019 to March 2021 and its Vice President of Finance from 2014 until 2019. From 2009 to 2014, Ms. Gurrola served NTN Buzztime, Inc. in various leadership accounting roles, including Controller, Director of Accounting, and Director of Financial Reporting and Compliance. Previously, she was a senior manager of financial reporting for Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc., a biotechnology company. Ms. Gurrola received a B.A. in English from San Diego State University.

James Bristol has served as a member of our Board of Directors since October 2023. Dr. Bristol worked for 32 years in drug discovery, research and preclinical development at Schering-Plough Corporation, Parke-Davis, and Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”), serving in various senior research and development roles. From 2003 until his retirement in 2007, Dr. Bristol served as Senior Vice President of Worldwide Drug Discovery Research at Pfizer Global Research & Development, where he oversaw 3,000 scientists at seven Pfizer sites as they produced an industry leading number of drug development candidates in 11 therapeutic areas. In 2009, Dr. Bristol joined Frazier Healthcare Partners as a Senior Advisor. Since August 2007, Dr. Bristol has served as a member of the board of directors of Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, and since 2018 he has served as a member of the board of directors of Erasca, Inc., both of which are publicly traded life science companies. Dr. Bristol also served on the board of directors of Ignyta from 2014 until its acquisition by Roche in 2018, and served on the board of directors of SUDO Biosciences, Inc. from June 2021 until December 2023, and of Cadent Therapeutics, Inc. from 2011 until 2020. Dr. Bristol is the author of over 100 publications, abstracts and patents, and he conducted postdoctoral research at the University of Michigan (NIH Postdoctoral Fellow) and at The Squibb Institute for Medical Research. Dr. Bristol holds a Ph.D. in organic chemistry from the University of New Hampshire and a B.S. in Chemistry from Bates College.

Dr. Bristol’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his vast experience in the biopharmaceutical industry, including in management and as a director, as well as his expertise in drug discovery and development.

Peter Cicala has served as a member of our Board of Directors since February 2024.  Mr. Cicala currently serves as General Counsel for a private biotechnology company, where he has been since March of 2021.  In November of 2019, he co-founded Pretzel Therapeutics, Inc., a biotechnology company, and still serves as an executive advisor.  From March 2020 until March 2021, Mr. Cicala served as Chief Intellectual Property Counsel for Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and from March 2014 until November 2019, he served as Chief Patent Counsel for Celgene Corporation, both publicly traded biopharmaceutical companies.  Mr. Cicala has practiced law for over 25 years, and also has over 10 years of experience as a medicinal chemist.  He received his B.S. in chemistry from Fairleigh Dickinson University and a J.D. from Seton Hall University School of Law.

Mr. Cicala’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his expertise in pharmaceutical and biotechnology intellectual property law and in strategic management of proprietary technology and products.

William Wexler has served as a member of our Board of Directors since June 2022. Prior to joining our Board of Directors, Mr. Wexler worked on over 150 individual projects, serving in various capacities including as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Restructuring Officer and other designated roles of senior responsibility. Mr. Wexler has served as the Managing Member of WEXLER Consulting LLC, a management consulting firm, since 2012. From 2012 to 2019, he served in various roles, including as Chairman of the Board, interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Executive Officer and sole director and stockholder representative of Upstate New York Power Products, Inc., a holding company that owned and operated power plants throughout upstate New York. From 2012 to 2013, Mr. Wexler served as Chief Restructuring Officer of VMR Electronics, LLC, a manufacturer of cable assembly products for the electronics interconnect industry. Prior to that, he served as a Managing Director and national finance practice lead at BBK, Ltd., a turn-around advisory firm, from 2006 to 2011. Mr. Wexler served as group Managing Director of corporate restructuring at Huron Consulting Group, LLC from 2002 to 2005. Previously, he was a Managing Director at Berenson Minella & Co., a boutique investment-banking firm, from 2000 to 2002. Between 1986 and 2000 he served as a Senior Director at BNP Paribas, where he established and led Paribas Properties, Inc., a real estate investment arm of the bank, and also where he was a lead officer of the then newly created U.S. asset workout group. Mr. Wexler started his professional career in 1981 in commercial lease brokerage, asset management and investment sales at Jones Lang Wootton (now Jones Lang LaSalle) where he worked until 1986. He earned a B.A. in Political Science from Johns Hopkins University.

Mr. Wexler’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his experience in investment and senior management roles, as well as his business training and education.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of our officers or directors.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None of our directors or executive officers is involved in any legal proceeding that requires disclosure under Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K.

Code of Ethics. Our Board has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive and senior financial officers. The full text of our Code of Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at www.eternatx.com under Investor Relations—Governance and is available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy from our Secretary. We intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, or waivers of certain provisions as they relate to our directors and executive officers, at the same location on our website or in our public filings. The information requiredon our website is not intended to form a part of or be incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Audit Committee
We have a standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. Our Audit Committee consists of William Wexler (Chair), James Bristol and Peter Cicala, all of whom meet the requirements for independence of Audit Committee members under applicable Nasdaq and SEC rules, including Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. All of the members of our Audit Committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq. In addition, Mr. Wexler qualifies as our “Audit Committee financial expert,” as such term is defined in Item 10 (Directors,407 of Regulation S-K.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC reports of ownership of, and transactions in, our equity securities. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of copies of such reports that we received, our records and written representations received from our directors, executive officers and certain of those persons who own greater than 10% of any class of our equity securities, for the year ended December 31, 2023, all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with on a timely basis, with the exception of Dr. Bristol’s inadvertent late filing of his Form 3 filed on November 13, 2023, and which was due on November 9, 2023.
Changes in Stockholder Nomination Procedures
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors since such procedures were last described in our proxy statement filed with the SEC on May 5, 2023.
ITEM 11.Executive Compensation
Introduction
Overview
When determining executive officer compensation, and the various components that comprise it, our Compensation Committee evaluates and considers publicly available executive officer compensation survey data to present a competitive compensation package to attract and retain top talent, including an appropriate level of salary, performance-based bonus and equity incentives. Typically, the Compensation Committee evaluates competitive market benchmark data for a given executive role. Additionally, the Compensation Committee is authorized to engage outside advisors and experts to assist and advise the Compensation Committee on matters relating to executive compensation. In 2023, the Compensation Committee retained the services of Pearl Meyer, an independent compensation consultant, to review the cash and equity compensation package to be offered to Mr. Luther prior to his appointment as our Chief Executive Officer.
Our Chief Executive Officer presents compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the executive officers other than himself. The Compensation Committee considers such recommendations, in conjunction with possible input from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, in making compensation decisions or recommendations to the full Board. The full Board participates in evaluating the performance of our executive officers, except that our Chief Executive Officer does not participate when the Board evaluates his or her performance and is not present during voting or deliberations regarding his or her performance or compensation matters.
Compensation-Related Risk Assessment
Our Compensation Committee assesses and monitors whether any of our compensation policies and programs are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company. The Compensation Committee and management do not believe that the Company presently maintains compensation policies or practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s risk management or create incentives that could lead to excessive or inappropriate risk taking by employees. In reaching this conclusion, the Compensation Committee considered all components of our compensation program and assessed any associated risks. The Compensation Committee also considered the various strategies and measures employed by the company that mitigate such risk, including: (i) the overall balance achieved through our use of a mix of cash and equity, annual and long-term incentives and time-and performance-based compensation; (ii) our use of multi-year vesting periods for equity grants; and (ii) the oversight exercised by the Compensation Committee over performance metrics, if any, established for performance-based bonuses and its administration of our equity incentive plans.
Compensation Recoupment (Clawback) Policy
In 2023, we adopted a clawback policy providing for the recovery of erroneously-awarded incentive-based compensation related to the three fiscal years preceding the date on which the company is required to prepare an accounting restatement. The clawback policy complies with the requirements of Nasdaq’s listing rules.
Named Executive Officers
Under applicable SEC rules and regulations, our “named executive officers” are all individuals who served as our principal executive officer during 2023, our two most highly compensated executive officers (other than our principal executive officer) who were serving as executive officers at December 31, 2023, and up to two additional individuals who would have been one of our top two most highly compensated executive officer had they been serving as an executive officer at the end of 2023. Our 2023 named executive officers are identified in the table below:
Name
Title
Matthew Angel(1)
Former Chief Executive Officer
Sandra Gurrola
Senior Vice President of Finance
Andrew Jackson (1)
Former Chief Financial Officer

(1)
Dr. Angel and Mr. Jackson resigned as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, effective December 31, 2023 and May 4, 2023, respectively.

Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets out the compensation for our Named Executive Officers for the years ended December 31, 2023 and Corporate Governance)December 31, 2022:

2023 Summary Compensation Table
Name and
Principal Position
Fiscal
Year
Salary
(US$)
Bonus (US$)
Stock-
Based
Awards
(US$)(1)
Option-
Based
Awards
(US$)(1)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(US$)
Nonqualified
deferred
compensation
earnings
(US$)
All Other
Compensation
(US$)
Total
Compensation
(US$)
Matthew Angel, Former Chief Executive Officer and President(2)
2023
$350,000
$—
$—
$461,680
$13,000(3)
$—
$—)
$824,680
 
2022
$—
$210,959(4)
$—
$910,453
$—
$—
$29,842(5)
$1,151,254
Sandra Gurrola, Sr. Vice President of Finance(6)
2023
$255,833
$50,050(7)
$—
$—
$—
$—
$—
$305,883
Andrew Jackson, Former Chief Financial Officer(8)
2023
$144,621
$—
$—
$—
$—
$—
$217,487(9)
$362,108
2022
$243,679
$—
$—
$305,466
$—
$—
$—
$549,145

1.
The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options granted during the applicable year. These amounts were calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, except that any estimate of forfeitures was disregarded. For a description of the assumptions used in computing the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes, see Note 15, Stock-Based Compensation, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
2.Dr. Angel was appointed our Interim Chief Executive Officer and President on May 26, 2022 and to our Board effective June 6, 2022.  Dr. Angel was appointed our Chief Executive Officer and President on January 1, 2023. Dr. Angel resigned as our Chief Executive Officer and President and from our Board effective August 4, 2023 and was reappointed as our Chief Executive Officer and President on August 9, 2023.  Dr. Angel subsequently resigned as our Chief Executive Officer and President effective December 31, 2023.

3.
Represents amounts earned pursuant to Dr. Angel’s employment offer letter equal to two percent of the gross proceeds that we received from an exclusive option and license agreement entered into with a third party.
4.
A cash signing bonus, which represents the salary Dr. Angel would have earned for the period during which he served as interim Chief Executive Officer and President, had Dr. Angel’s appointment as Chief Executive Officer and President been in effect beginning May 26, 2022.
5.
Represents a reimbursement of legal fees Dr. Angel incurred in connection with entering into his employment offer letter.
6.
Ms. Gurrola has served as our Senior Vice President of Finance since May 2023 and was not a named executive officer for the year ended December 31, 2022.
7.
Represents a discretionary spot bonus paid to Ms. Gurrola and approved by our Board.
8.
Mr. Jackson was appointed Chief Financial Officer effective May 31, 2022 and resigned as our Chief Financial Officer effective May 4, 2023.
9.
Includes $207,500 of severance payments, $9,787 in reimbursement payments for COBRA and $200 for cell phone reimbursement.
Narrative to Summary Compensation Table
The following is a discussion of each component of our executive compensation program for 2023.
Base Salary
Each of our named executive officers receives a base salary. The base salary is the fixed cash compensation component of our executive compensation program and it recognizes individual performance, time in role, scope of responsibility, leadership skills and experience. The base salary compensates an executive for performing his or her job responsibilities on a day-to-day basis. Generally, base salaries are reviewed annually company-wide and adjusted (upward or downward) when appropriate based upon individual performance, expanded duties, changes in the competitive marketplace and, with respect to upward adjustments, if we are, financially and otherwise, able to pay it. We try to offer competitive base salaries to help attract and retain executive talent.
In December 2023, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board approved an increase to Ms. Gurrola’s annual base salary from $220,000 to $275,000.  In addition, the Board approved a lump sum payment of $33,542 to Ms. Gurrola, representing the additional amount of salary Ms. Gurrola would have received had the increase to her annual base salary taken effect as of May 5, 2023.
Bonus and Incentive Compensation
In addition to base salaries, our Compensation Committee has the authority to award discretionary annual bonuses to our named executive officers based on corporate and individual performance. Each year, the Compensation Committee or the Board may establish performance goals, which may be based on measures such as revenue, achievement of certain research and development milestones, completion of a strategic transaction, and other metrics the directors and management believe to provide proper incentives for achieving long-term shareholder value. The Board retains full discretion over performance evaluation and the amount of any bonuses to be paid to a named executive officer. Annual bonuses, if any, are intended to reward the individual performance of each named executive officer. In addition to an assessment of corporate and individual performance, the determination of the amount of a named executive officer’s bonus may vary from year to year depending on our financial condition and conditions in the industry in which we operate.  The amount of such bonuses increase with executive rank so that, as rank increases, a greater portion of total annual cash compensation is based on annual corporate and individual performance.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, no performance goals were established for any named executive officer, however, the Compensation Committee approved a discretionary spot bonus to be paid to Ms. Gurrola in the amount of $50,050 to reward her individual performance during the year.
Under the terms of his offer, Dr. Angel was eligible to receive a performance bonus equal to two percent of the gross proceeds that we actually received under licensing, option, collaboration, partnership, joint venture, settlement, and similar agreements that we enter into, or other actions, judgments, or orders, that generate cash proceeds to us, that are originated, negotiated and/or entered into by us during Dr. Angel’s employment, subject to certain conditions.  During 2023, Dr. Angel received $13,000 in performance bonus payments as a result of an exclusive option and license agreement we entered into with a third party.
Equity-Based Compensation Programs
Historically we have issued stock options to our employees, including our named executive officers, to provide a means whereby our employees may develop a sense of proprietorship and personal involvement in our development and financial success, and to encourage them to devote their best efforts to us, thereby advancing our interests and the interests of stockholders. The Board believes that the granting of equity awards promotes continuity of management and increases incentive and personal interest in our welfare by those who are primarily responsible for shaping and carrying out our long-range plans and pursuing our growth and financial success.
In 2023, we granted to Dr. Angel a time-based incentive stock option covering 132,003 shares of common stock, of which 110,043 shares vested immediately on the grant date and the remaining 21,960 shares vest in 35 substantially equal monthly installments on the first day of each month thereafter, subject to his continuous service. In connection with Dr. Angel’s resignation effective December 31, 2023, all unvested options were immediately cancelled, and he has 90 days from the date of termination of his employment to exercise any vested options, at which time any unexercised vested options will be cancelled.
Benefits and Perquisites
Employee Benefit Plans
Named executive officers are eligible to participate in our employee benefit plans, including our medical, disability and life insurance plans, in each case, on the same basis as all of our other employees. Our employee benefit plans are designed to assist in attracting and retaining skilled employees. We also maintain a 401(k) plan for the benefit of our eligible employees, including the named executive officers, as discussed below.
401(k) Plan
We maintain a retirement savings plan, or 401(k) plan, that provides eligible U.S. employees with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis. Under the 401(k) Plan, eligible employees may defer up to 90% of their compensation subject to applicable annual contribution limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Item 11 (Executive Compensation)and limits imposed by non-discrimination testing. Our employees’ pre-tax contributions are allocated to each participant’s individual account and participants are immediately and fully vested in their contributions. The 401(k) plan is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code with the 401(k) plan’s related trust intended to be tax exempt under Section 501(a) of the Code. As a tax-qualified retirement plan, contributions to the 401(k) plan and earnings on those contributions are not taxable to the employees until distributed from the 401(k) plan. Beginning on January 1, 2023, we began matching employees’ contributions at a rate of 100% of the first 3% of the employee’s contribution and 50% of the next 2% of the employee’s contribution, for a maximum match of 4%.
Pension Benefits
We do not maintain any pension benefit or retirement plans other than the 401(k) Plan.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
We do not maintain any nonqualified deferred compensation plans.
Named Executive Officer Employment Agreements and Change in Control Arrangements
The following descriptions summarize the principal terms of our employment agreements with our named executive officers.
Matthew Angel
On December 30, 2022, we entered into an offer letter with Dr. Angel effective on January 1, 2023 with respect to terms of his employment as our Chief Executive Officer and President.  The compensatory terms of the offer letter, including equity awards, were approved by the Compensation Committee. Dr. Angel’s hiring, and his offer letter, were approved by the Board.
From May 24, 2022 until he was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and President, Dr. Angel served as our interim Chief Executive Officer and President.  Dr. Angel did not receive any salary or other cash compensation during his tenure as interim Chief Executive Officer and President.
Under the terms of his offer letter, we paid Dr. Angel an annual base salary of $350,000. We also paid Dr. Angel a cash signing bonus of $210,959, which represented the salary Dr. Angel would have earned for the period during which he served as interim Chief Executive Officer and President.
Dr. Angel was eligible to receive a performance bonus equal to two percent of the gross proceeds that we actually received pursuant to all licensing, option, collaboration, partnership, joint venture, settlement, other similar agreements that we entered into, or other actions, judgments, or orders that generate cash proceeds to us, that are originated, negotiated and/or entered into by us during Dr. Angel’s employment (commencing on May 26, 2022), Item 12 (Security Ownershipsubject to certain conditions.
In accordance with the terms of Certain Beneficial Ownershis offer letter, in January 2023, we granted to Dr. Angel a time-based incentive stock option covering 132,003 shares of common stock, of which 110,043 shares vested immediately on the grant date and Managementthe remaining 21,960 shares vest in 35 substantially equal monthly installments on the first day of each month thereafter, subject to his continuous service.
Dr. Angel resigned as our Chief Executive Officer and Related Stockholder Matters),President effective December 31, 2023. Upon termination of Dr. Angel’s employment, all unvested options were immediately cancelled, and Dr. Angel has 90 days from the date of termination of his employment to exercise any vested options, at which time any unexercised vested options will be cancelled.
For information on related party transactions with Dr. Angel, see Item 13, (CertainCertain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence)Independence.
Sandra Gurrola
We entered into an employment agreement, dated as of June 16, 2021, with Sandra Gurrola, which provides for our at-will employment of Ms. Gurrola commencing on June 21, 2021 and continuing until terminated by us or Ms. Gurrola.  Ms. Gurrola’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $220,000, which amount is subject to periodic review by the Board or the Compensation Committee. Ms. Gurrola is also eligible to receive an annual cash bonus award in an amount up to 35% of her base salary upon achievement of agreed upon performance targets. The bonus will be determined by the Board or the Compensation Committee and paid annually by March 15 in the year following the performance year on which such bonus is based.
In accordance with the terms of her employment agreement, in June 2021, Ms. Gurrola was granted 1,750 restricted stock units, 25% of which vests on each anniversary of the grant date over four years.  Vesting generally requires Ms. Gurrola’s continued employment through the relevant vesting date.
If Ms. Gurrola’s employment is terminated by us without Cause (as defined in the employment agreement) or by Ms. Gurrola for Good Reason (as defined in the employment agreement), we will pay Ms. Gurrola all amounts accrued but unpaid as of the effective date of such termination, as well as continuation of her salary and benefits for the following six-month period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a termination of employment without Cause or for Good Reason occurs within 90 days before or 12 months after a Change in Control (as defined in the employment agreement), Ms. Gurrola will receive the benefits described in the preceding sentence, but the continuation of her salary and benefits will be for 12-month period, and, in addition, Ms. Gurrola will receive a lump-sum payment of her target bonus and the restricted stock units granted to her in June 2021 will fully vest. Any such severance benefits under the employment agreement are contingent on Ms. Gurrola entering into and not revoking a general release of claims in favor of our company.
Andrew Jackson
We entered into an amended and restated employment agreement, dated as of May 10, 2022, which provided for our at-will employment of Mr. Jackson commencing on May 31, 2022 and continuing until terminated by us or Mr. Jackson.  Mr. Jackson resigned as our Chief Financial Officer on May 4, 2023.
Under the terms of his employment agreement, we paid Mr. Jackson an annual base salary of $415,000. Mr. Jackson was also eligible to receive an annual cash bonus award in an amount up to 40% of his base salary upon achievement of agreed upon performance targets. The bonus would be determined by the Board or the Compensation Committee and paid annually by March 15 in the year following the performance year on which such bonus was based.
In accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Jackson received a time-based nonqualified stock option covering 33,239 shares of common stock, 25% of which would vest on the first anniversary of the employment agreement’s effective date, and the remainder would vest ratably on a monthly basis over the three-year period thereafter. Vesting generally required Mr. Jackson’s continued employment through the relevant vesting date.  Due to Mr. Jackson’s termination prior to the first anniversary of the employment agreement’s effective date, none of the shares subject to such option vested and all 33,239 shares were immediately cancelled upon his termination.
We entered into a separation agreement and general release with Mr. Jackson on May 2, 2023, pursuant to which, we paid Mr. Jackson a continuation of his salary for the following six-month period as well as reimbursement of up to six months of his COBRA premiums in exchange for Mr. Jackson entering into and not revoking a general release of claims in favor or our company.
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2023 Fiscal Year-End
The following table summarizes the number of shares of our common stock underlying outstanding equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2023.
 
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Name
Grant Date
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
exercisable
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
unexercisable
Equity
incentive
plan
awards:
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
unearned
options (#)
Option
exercise
price
($)
Option
expiration
date
Number of
shares or
units of
stock that
have not
vested (#)
Market
value of
shares of
units of
stock that
have not
vested ($)
Equity
incentive
plan
awards:
Number
of
unearned
shares,
units or
other
rights
that have
not
vested
(#)
Equity
incentive
plan
awards:
Market or
payout
value of
unearned
shares,
units or
other
rights that
have not
vested
shares ($)
Matthew Angel,
Former Chief
8/1/2022(1)
46,629
9.80
3/30/2024
Executive Officer and President
1/12/2023(1)
116,753
4.84
3/30/2024
Sandra Gurrola,
Sr. Vice President of Finance(3)
6/21/2021(2)
874
1,573
3/11/2022(3)
3,339
2,386
38.60
3/11/2032
Andrew Jackson,
Former Chief Financial Officer
1.
Dr. Angel resigned effective December 31, 2023.  Unvested options were immediately cancelled and vested options will expire 90 days from the date of termination.

2.
The restricted stock units vest at a rate of 25% of the shares subject to the award in four substantially equal annual installments on the anniversary date of the grant date.
3.
The option vests in 36 substantially equal monthly installments.
Employment Agreement with Current Chief Executive Officer
Sanjeev Luther was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2024. Mr. Luther did not serve as one of our executive officers during 2023, and is therefore not one of our 2023 named executive officers.
We entered into an employment agreement, dated as of December 19, 2023, with Mr. Luther, which provides for at-will employment until terminated by us or Mr. Luther. Mr. Luther’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $550,000, which amount is subject to periodic review by the Board or the Compensation Committee.  Mr. Luther also received a one-time signing bonus of $75,000.
Mr. Luther is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus award in an amount up to 50% of his base salary upon achievement of agreed upon performance targets. The bonus will be determined by the Board or the Compensation Committee and paid annually by March 15 in the year following the performance year on which such bonus is based.
In accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Luther was granted an equity award on January 1, 2024, consisting of 1,685,218 non-qualified stock options, which will vest over a four-year period, with 25% of the options vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining options vesting monthly over the remaining three years.  Vesting generally requires Mr. Luther’s continued employment through the relevant vesting date.
If Mr. Luther’s employment is terminated by us without Cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or by Mr. Luther for Good Reason (as defined in his employment agreement), we will pay Mr. Luther all amounts accrued but unpaid as of the effective date of such termination, as well as a lump sum payment equal to nine months of his salary, as well as up to nine months of continued benefits. Mr. Luther will also be paid a pro-rata performance bonus equal to (x) the performance bonus Mr. Luther would have received based on actual performance for such fiscal year if Mr. Luther had remained employed for the entire fiscal year multiplied by (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days Mr. Luther was employed during such fiscal year.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a termination without Cause or for Good Reason occurs beginning upon the occurrence of a Change in Control (as defined in the employment agreement) and ending on the first anniversary of the occurrence of the Change in Control (“Change in Control Protection Period”), Mr. Luther will receive the benefits described in the preceding sentence, but the lump sum severance payment and the payment of benefits will be for a 12-month period and he will receive 100% of his target bonus. In addition, all outstanding and unvested equity awards granted to Mr. Luther during his employment will become immediately vested and exercisable upon such date of termination during the Change in Control Protection Period and will be exercisable for a period of 12 months following the date of termination during the Change in Control Protection Period.  Any such severance benefits under the employment agreement are contingent on Mr. Luther entering into and not revoking a general release of claims in favor of our company.
Director Compensation
We have a non-employee director compensation program to compensate our non-employee directors for their service in such capacity with annual retainers and equity compensation as described below. However, since August 2022, we have not compensated our non-employee directors in accordance with our non-employee director compensation program. Our Compensation Committee and Board are assessing our non-employee director compensation program, and if and when we restart compensating our non-employee directors for their service in such capacity, the elements of our non-employee director compensation program may be different from what is described below.

Compensation Element
Amount
Annual Board Member Compensation
Paid in cash or stock options, at the Board’s discretion. Cash paid in quarterly installments or upon the effective date of an earlier resignation of the non-employee director.  Stock Options to vest quarterly over one year from grant date:
a.
Board Member: $40,000
b.
Board Chair: $70,000
Committee Member Retainers
Paid in cash or stock options, at the Board’s discretion. Cash paid in quarterly installments or upon the effective date of an earlier resignation of the non-employee director.  Stock Options to vest quarterly over one year from grant date:
c.
Audit Committee: $7,500
d.
Compensation Committee: $5,000
e.
Nominating/Governance Committee: $4,000
Leadership Supplemental Retainer
Paid in cash or stock options, at the Board’s discretion. Cash paid in quarterly installments or upon the effective date of an earlier resignation of the non-employee director.  Stock Options to vest quarterly over one year from grant date:
f.
Audit Committee Chair: $15,000
g.
Compensation Committee Chair: $10,000
h.
Nominating/Governance Committee Chair: $8,000
New Director Equity Award (outside directors)
Option for 8,290 shares of Common Stock, which option shall have an exercise price equal to the fair market value per share of common stock, as determined under the 2020 Plan, and, subject to continued service on the Board, vest in an initial installment of 1/3 of the shares on the first anniversary of the grant date, with the remaining shares to vest in 24 substantially equal installments thereafter.

The Board and the Compensation Committee designed our non-employee director compensation program to reward directors for their contributions to our success, align the director compensation program with stockholder interests, and provide competitive compensation necessary to attract and retain high quality non-employee directors. We do not pay fees to any of our directors for meeting attendance.
2023 Director Compensation
During 2023, we did not compensate any of our directors, in either cash or equity, for their service in such capacity.  On January 1, 2024, we granted to Dorothy Clarke a stock option to purchase 84,261 shares of our common stock as compensation for her services as a member of our Board from August 28, 2023 until December 31, 2023, for which she had previously not been compensated.

As of December 31, 2023, none of our directors held any outstanding equity awards other than William Wexler, who held a stock option to purchase 15,895 shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2023, Gregory Fiore, a former director who resigned from our Board effective October 4, 2023, held stock options to purchase 10,742 shares of our common stock, which expired unexercised 90 days following the date of his resignation.

ITEM 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth information known to us regarding beneficial ownership of common stock as of March 12, 2024 (the “Measurement Date”) by:
each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of outstanding common stock;
each of our named executive officers and directors; and
all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC, which generally provide that a person has beneficial ownership of a security if he, she or it possesses sole or shared voting or investment power over that security, including options and warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after the Measurement Date. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person or entity and the percentage ownership of that person or entity in the table below, all shares subject to options, warrants and restricted stock units held by such person or entity were deemed outstanding if such securities are currently exercisable, or exercisable or would vest based on service-based vesting conditions within 60 days of the Measurement Date, assuming that the liquidity event vesting conditions had been satisfied as of such date. These shares were not deemed outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person or entity.
The beneficial ownership of our common stock is based on 5,410,331 shares of our common stock outstanding as of the Measurement Date.
Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that each person named in the table below has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by him.
Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of these stockholders is c/o Eterna Therapeutics, Inc., 1035 Cambridge Street, Suite 18A, Cambridge, MA 02141.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Common
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Percentage
of Common
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Series A
Convertible
Preferred
Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Percentage
of Series A
Convertible
Preferred
Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Percentage
of Total
Voting
Power
Greater than 5% Stockholders:
 
 
 
 
 
Charles Cherington(1)
1,212,707
19.99%
71,306
45.7%
19.99%
George Denny(2)
1,237,448
19.99%
71,306
45.7%
19.99%
Freebird Partners LP(3)
1,283,634
19.99%
19.99%
Nicholas J. Singer(4)
600,480
9.99%
9.99%
IAF, LLC(5)
576,899
9.99%
9.99%
John Halpern(6)
550,282
9.99%
9.99%
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
 
 
 
 
 
Matthew Angel(7)
337,864
6.06%
6.06%
Sandra Gurrola(8)
4,903
*
*
Andrew Jackson
James Bristol
Dorothy Clarke
Sanjeev Luther
William Wexler(9)
15,204
*
*
All current directors and executive officers as a group (5 persons)(10)
20,107
6.43%
6.43%

*
Less than 1%

(1)
The number of common shares beneficially owned consists of (i) 556,465 shares of common stock, (ii) 8,460 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of shares of Series A convertible preferred stock (assuming a conversion rate of 8.4282 per share) and (iii) 656,242 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of note warrants and/or the conversion of convertible notes (assuming a conversion price of $1.9194 per share). As further described below, such warrants and convertible notes are subject to a 19.99% blocker. The number of common shares beneficially owned, the percentage of common shares beneficially owned and the percentage of total voting power shown in the table gives effect to such blocker. Pursuant to the terms of the note warrants and convertible notes, the number of shares of common stock that may be acquired by the holder thereof upon exercise of the note warrants and/or conversion of the convertible notes is limited, to the extent necessary, to ensure that following such exercise and/or conversion, the number of shares of common stock then beneficially owned by the holder and any other persons or entities whose beneficial ownership of common stock would be attributed to the holder for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act does not exceed 19.99% of the total number of shares of our common stock then outstanding. Upon delivery of a written notice to us, the holder may from time to time increase (with such increase not effective until the 61st day after delivery of such notice) or decrease the blocker to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%.   Mr. Cherington’s address is c/o Ara Partners, LLC, 200 Berkeley Street, 26th Floor, Boston, MA, 02116.

(2)
Denny Family Partners II, LLC owns 50,453 shares of common stock and the George Denny III Trust dated 6/11/1981 owns 406,785 shares of common stock. Mr. Denny disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Denny Family Partners II, LLC except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.  Mr. Denny has sole voting and dispositive power over 204 shares of common stock and has shared voting and dispositive power over 460,209 shares of common stock. Mr. Denny’s address is PO Box 423, Poland, ME 04274. The foregoing information has been included solely in reliance upon, and without independent investigation of, the disclosures contained in the Schedule 13G/A filed by Mr. Denny with the SEC on March 6, 2023.

The number of common shares beneficially owned consists of (i) 457,442 shares of common stock, (ii) 8,460 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of shares of Series A convertible preferred stock (assuming a conversion rate of 8.4282 per share) and (iii) 780,006 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of note warrants and/or the conversion of convertible notes (assuming a conversion price of $1.9194 per share). As further described below, such warrants and convertible notes are subject to a 19.99% blocker. The number of common shares beneficially owned, the percentage of common shares beneficially owned and the percentage of total voting power shown in the table gives effect to such blocker. Pursuant to the terms of the note warrants and convertible notes, the number of shares of common stock that may be acquired by the holder thereof upon exercise of the note warrants and/or conversion of the convertible notes is limited, to the extent necessary, to ensure that following such exercise and/or conversion, the number of shares of common stock then beneficially owned by the holder and any other persons or entities whose beneficial ownership of common stock would be attributed to the holder for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act does not exceed 19.99% of the total number of shares of our common stock then outstanding. Upon delivery of a written notice to us, the holder may from time to time increase (with such increase not effective until the 61st day after delivery of such notice) or decrease the blocker to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%.

(3)
The number of common shares beneficially owned consists of (i) 272,583 shares of common stock and (ii) 1,011,055 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of note warrants and/or the conversion of convertible notes (assuming a conversion price of $1.9194 per share). As further described below, such warrants and convertible notes are subject to a 19.99% blocker. The number of common shares beneficially owned, the percentage of common shares beneficially owned and the percentage of total voting power shown in the table gives effect to such blocker. Pursuant to the terms of the note warrants and convertible notes, the number of shares of common stock that may be acquired by the holder thereof upon exercise of the note warrants and/or conversion of the convertible notes is limited, to the extent necessary, to ensure that following such exercise and/or conversion, the number of shares of common stock then beneficially owned by the holder and any other persons or entities whose beneficial ownership of common stock would be attributed to the holder for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act does not exceed 19.99% of the total number of shares of our common stock then outstanding. Upon delivery of a written notice to us, the holder may from time to time increase (with such increase not effective until the 61st day after delivery of such notice) or decrease the blocker to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%.  Curtis Huff is the sole member of Freebird Partners, LP.  Freebird Partners, LP’s address is 2800 Post Oak Blvd, Suite 2000, Houston, TX 77056.

(4)
The number of common shares beneficially owned consists of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of note warrants and/or the conversion of convertible notes held by Purchase Capital LLC, of which Mr. Singer is the controlling person, or by Pacific Premier Trust as custodian for the benefit of Mr. Singer .  The foregoing information has been included in reliance upon, and without independent investigation of, the disclosures contained in the Schedule 13G/A filed by Mr. Singer with the SEC on January 19, 2024.  As further described below, such warrants and convertible notes are subject to a 9.99% blocker. The number of common shares beneficially owned, the percentage of common shares beneficially owned and the percentage of total voting power shown in the table gives effect to such blocker. Pursuant to the terms of the note warrants and convertible notes, the number of shares of common stock that may be acquired by the holder thereof upon exercise of the note warrants and/or conversion of the convertible notes is limited, to the extent necessary, to ensure that following such exercise and/or conversion, the number of shares of common stock then beneficially owned by the holder and any other persons or entities whose beneficial ownership of common stock would be attributed to the holder for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act does not exceed 9.99% of the total number of shares of our common stock then outstanding. Upon delivery of a written notice to us, the holder may from time to time increase (with such increase not effective until the 61st day after delivery of such notice) or decrease the blocker to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%.  Mr. Singer’s address is 1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33131.

(5)
The number of common shares beneficially owned consists of (i) 212,464 shares of common stock and (ii) 364,435 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of note warrants and/or the conversion of convertible notes (assuming a conversion price of $1.9194 per share).  As further described below, such warrants and convertible notes are subject to a 9.99% blocker. The number of common shares beneficially owned, the percentage of common shares beneficially owned and the percentage of total voting power shown in the table gives effect to such blocker. Pursuant to the terms of the note warrants and convertible notes, the number of shares of common stock that may be acquired by the holder thereof upon exercise of the note warrants and/or conversion of the convertible notes is limited, to the extent necessary, to ensure that following such exercise and/or conversion, the number of shares of common stock then beneficially owned by the holder and any other persons or entities whose beneficial ownership of common stock would be attributed to the holder for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act does not exceed 9.99% of the total number of shares of our common stock then outstanding. Upon delivery of a written notice to us, the holder may from time to time increase (with such increase not effective until the 61st day after delivery of such notice) or decrease the blocker to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%. IAF, LLC has sole voting and dispositive powers.  IAF LLC’s address is 115 Church Street, Charleston, SC 29401.

(6)
The number of common shares beneficially owned consists of (i) 452,284 shares of common stock held by the John D. Halpern Revocable Trust, of which, Mr. Halpern and Katherine H. Halpern are trustees and (ii) 97,998 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of note warrants and/or the conversion of convertible notes (assuming a conversion price of $1.9194 per share).  As further described below, such warrants and convertible notes are subject to a 9.99% blocker. The number of common shares beneficially owned, the percentage of common shares beneficially owned and the percentage of total voting power shown in the table gives effect to such blocker. Pursuant to the terms of the note warrants and convertible notes, the number of shares of common stock that may be acquired by the holder thereof upon exercise of the note warrants and/or conversion of the convertible notes is limited, to the extent necessary, to ensure that following such exercise and/or conversion, the number of shares of common stock then beneficially owned by the holder and any other persons or entities whose beneficial ownership of common stock would be attributed to the holder for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act does not exceed 9.99% of the total number of shares of our common stock then outstanding. Upon delivery of a written notice to us, the holder may from time to time increase (with such increase not effective until the 61st day after delivery of such notice) or decrease the blocker to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%. Mr. Halpern and Ms. Halpern share voting and dispositive powers.  Mr. Halpern’s address is PO Box 540 Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03802.

(7)
Includes 163,382 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options.

(8)
Includes 3,975 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options.

(9)
Represents shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options.

(10)
Includes 19,179 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table contains information as of December 31, 2023 with respect to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance.

 Equity Compensation Plan Information 
Plan Category 
Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
  
Weighted-
average
exercise price of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
  
Number of
securities
remaining
available for future
issuance under
equity
compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))
 
 (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by securityholders(1)
  
296,116
  
$
9.79
   
684,023
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders(2)
  
93,545
  
$
158.80
   
67,863
 
Total
  
389,661
  
$
45.00
   
751,886
 
(1)
At our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders approved a restatement of the Eterna Therapeutics Inc. Restated 2020 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Restated 2020 Plan”). The Restated 2020 Plan is a broad-based incentive plan, which allows for the grant of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, unrestricted stock awards and similar kinds of equity-based compensation to employees, directors, consultants and prospective employees.
(2)
In May 2021, our Board adopted our 2021 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan (the “2021 Inducement Plan”). The 2021 Inducement Plan was adopted without stockholder approval pursuant to Section 711 of the Company Guide of the NYSE American LLC, the stock exchange on which our common stock was listed at the time the 2021 Inducement Plan was adopted by our Board. The 2021 Inducement Plan provides for the grant of equity-based awards, including non-qualified stock options, performance shares, performance units, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and stock appreciation rights. The awards available for grant under the 2021 Inducement Plan are available only to new employees and incentive stock options may not be issued under the 2021 Inducement Plan.
ITEM 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Except as described in Note 11 (Related Party Transactions) to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 14 (Principal Accounting Fees and Services)8 of this report, which is incorporated by reference into this Item 13, since January 1, 2022, there has not been nor are there currently proposed any transactions or series of similar transactions to which we were or are to be a party in which the Company’s definitive proxy statementamount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent (1%) of the average of our total assets at year-end for the 2022 Annual Meetinglast two completed fiscal years and in which any director, executive officer, holder of Stockholdersmore than 5% of the common stock or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Related Party Transaction Policy
Our Audit Committee is responsible for the review, approval, or ratification of any potential conflict of interest transaction involving any of our directors or executive officers, director nominees, any person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding capital stock, or any family member of or related party to such persons, including any transaction required to be reported under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.
In reviewing any such proposed transaction, our Audit Committee is tasked with considering all relevant facts and circumstances, including the commercial reasonableness of the terms, the benefit or perceived benefit, or lack thereof, to us, opportunity costs of alternate transactions, the materiality and character of the related person’s direct or indirect interest and the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related person.
Under our policy, employees are required to report any material transaction or relationship that could result in a conflict of interest to our compliance officer.
Director Independence
Our Board undertook a review of the independence of each individual serving on our Board. Based on information provided by each such individual concerning his or her background, employment, and affiliations, our Board determined that the Board meets the independence requirements under Nasdaq’s listing rules and the SEC’s applicable rules and regulations. Our Board affirmatively determined that each of our non-employee directors—James Bristol, Peter Cicala and William Wexler—are “independent” as defined in Nasdaq’s listing rules. In making these determinations, our Board considered the current and prior relationships that each individual director has with us and other facts and circumstances our Board deemed relevant in assessing their independence. Under Nasdaq’s listing rules, a director who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by us cannot be considered “independent.” Accordingly, our Board determined that neither of the other two members of our Board (Sanjeev Luther, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Dorothy Clarke, our General Counsel) are “independent” as defined in Nasdaq’s listing rules.
ITEM 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Fees and Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The table below summarizes the fees and expenses billed to us by Grant Thornton for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

Year Audit Fees  Audit-Related Fees  Tax Fees  All Other Fees  Total 
2023 
$
516,224
  
$
  
$
  
$
  
$
516,224
 
2022 
$
435,750
  
$
  
$
  
$
  
$
435,750
 

Audit Fees. Audit fees consist of services rendered by an independent registered public accounting firm for the audit of our consolidated financial statements (including tax services performed to fulfill the auditor’s responsibility under generally accepted auditing standards) and our internal control over financial reporting, reviews of the interim financial statements included in Forms 10-Q and includes services that generally only an external auditor can reasonably provide, such as comfort letters, statutory audits, attest services, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of December 31, 2021.SEC.

Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees consist of assurance and related services (e.g., due diligence) by an external auditor that are reasonably related to the audit or review of financial statements, including employee benefit plan audits, due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, accounting consultations and audits in connection with proposed or consummated acquisitions, internal control reviews, attest services related to financial reporting that are not required by statute or regulation, and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

Tax Fees. Tax fees consist of services rendered by an external auditor for tax compliance, tax consulting and tax planning.

All Other Fees. All other fees are for any other permissible work that is not an Audit, Audit-Related or Tax Fee.

Policy for Approval of Audit and Permitted Non-Audit Services

All audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors are pre-approved by the Audit Committee (or the Chair of the Audit Committee, pursuant to a delegation of authority). These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent auditors and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditors in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis.

PART IV

ITEM 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
 
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
 
(1)Consolidated Financial Statements. The consolidated financial statements of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries are set forth in the “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” on page F-1.
 
(2)Financial Statement Schedules. None
 
(3)Exhibits. The following exhibits are submitted with this Annual Report on Form 10-K or, where indicated, incorporated by reference to other filings.
 
Exhibit
 
Description

Incorporated By Reference
Plans of Acquisition
 
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated April 26, 2023, by and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated August 12, 2020, among NTN Buzztime,Eterna Therapeutics Inc., BIT Merger Sub,Exacis Biotherapeutics Inc., the stockholders party thereto and, Brooklyn Immunotherapeutics LLC
with respect to certain provisions, Factor Bioscience Limited.
 Annex A to the proxy statement/prospectus/consent solicitation statement forming a part of the S-4 Registration Statement filed on January 20, 2021
Agreement and Plan of Acquisition, dated as of July 16, 2021, by and among Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc., Brooklyn Acquisition Sub, Inc., Novellus LLC, Novellus, Inc., and the Sellers’ Representative.
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 19, 2021May 2, 2023
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
 
Composite Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company

Exhibit to Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2013Filed herewith.
 
CertificateSecond Amended and Restated Bylaws of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation (reverse/forward split)Company

Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2016October 11, 2022
 
Certificate of Decrease of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2017
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation (decrease in authorized capital stock)

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2017
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Amendment, dated March 25, 2021 (Reverse Stock Split)

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2021
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Amendment, dated March 25, 2021 (Authorized Share Increase)

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2021
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Amendment, dated March 25, 2021 (Name Change)

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2021
Certificate of Validation of Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics,Eterna Therapeutics Inc., as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on September 3, 2021

Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2021
Amended and Restated BylawsInstruments Defining Rights of Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc.

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2021
Security Holders
 
Description of Registrant’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K filed on April 15, 2022
Material Contracts
 
Filed herewithSecurities Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2022, between Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and the purchaser party thereto
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2022
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2022, between Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and the purchaser party thereto
Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2022
Form of Pre-Funded Warrant (March 2022)
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2022
Form of Common Stock Warrant (March 2022)
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2022
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2022, by and among Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and the purchasers party thereto
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on November 25, 2022
Form of Warrant (November 2022)
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2022
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 2, 2022, by and among Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and the purchasers party thereto
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2022
 
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2021,5, 2023, by and betweenBrooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on April 30, 2021
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 26, 2021, between Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC
 
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on April 11, 2023
Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 5, 2023, by and between Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 11, 2023
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2023, by and among Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and the purchasers party thereto.
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2023
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2023, by and among Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and the purchasers party thereto.
Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2023
Form of 6% Senior Convertible Note (July 2023)
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2023

Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (July 2023)
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2023
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2023, by and among Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and the purchasers party thereto.
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2023
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2023, by and among Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and the parties thereto.
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2023
Form of 12.0% Senior Convertible Note (December 2023 and January 2024)
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2023
Form of Warrant (December 2023 and January 2024)
Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2023
Amended and Restated Exclusive License Agreement, dated November 14, 2023, by and between Factor Bioscience Limited and Eterna Therapeutics Inc.
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on November 16, 2023
Master Services Agreement, dated September 9, 2022, by and between Factor Bioscience Inc. and Eterna Therapeutics Inc.
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 15, 2022
Offer Letter, dated December 30, 2022, by and among Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and Dr. Matthew Angel
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2023
Agreement to Assign Space Lease dated March 5, 2022 between Eterna Therapeutics LLC and Regen Lab USA LLC.
Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q filed on July 1, 2022
Assignment and Assumption of Lease dated March 25, 2022 between Eterna Therapeutics LLC and Regen Lab USA LLC
Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q filed on July 1, 2022
Sublease Agreement, dated October 18, 2022, by and between E.R. Squibb & Sons, LLC and Eterna Therapeutics Inc.
Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-K filed on March 20, 2023
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2022, by and between Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and Andrew Jackson
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2022
Separation Agreement and General Release, dated May 2, 2023, by and between Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and Andrew Jackson.
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 5, 2023
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2023, by and among Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and Sanjeev Luther.
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2023
Eterna Therapeutics Inc. 2021 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan (the “2021 Inducement Plan”)
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed on May 26, 2021
 Form of Stock Option Inducement Award for issuances under the 2021 Inducement Plan
Registration RightsFiled herewith
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Inducement Award for issuances under the 2021 Inducement Plan
Filed herewith
Eterna Therapeutics Inc. Restated 2020 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Restated 2020 Plan”)
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2021
Form of Stock Option Inducement Award for issuances under the Restated 2020 Plan
Filed herewith
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Inducement Award for issuances under the Restated 2020 Plan
Filed herewith
Inducement Stock Option Award Agreement entered into with Sanjeev Luther
Exhibit 99.1 to Form S-8 filed on January 16, 2024
Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2023, by and among Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and Dorothy Clarke.
Filed herewith
Employment Agreement, dated as of JulyJune 16, 2021, by and among Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics,Eterna Therapeutics Inc. and the individuals and entities named therein.Sandra Gurrola.
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 19, 2021
Amended and Restated Royalty Agreement and Distribution Agreement, dated March 22, 2021.

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2021
10.5(a)
Assignment andAssumption of Employment Agreement dated March 30, 2021 among Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, LLC, Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. and Ronald Guido.

Exhibit to Form 8-K filedon March 31, 2021

10.6(a)

Assignment and Assumption of Employment Agreement dated March 30, 2021 among Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, LLC, Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. and Lynn Sadowski Mason.

Exhibit to Form 8-K filedon March 31, 2021
10.7(a)

Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2021 and effective as of April 16, 2021, between Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. and Howard J. Federoff.

Exhibit to Form 8-K filedon April 7, 2021
10.8(a)

Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2021 and effective as of June 28, 2021, between Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. and Kevin D’Amour.

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on June 10, 2021
10.9(a)

Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2021 and effective as of June 21, 2021, between Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. and Sandra Gurrola.

Exhibit to Form 8-K filedon June 21, 2021

Executive Employment Agreement, dated asForm of July 6, 2021indemnification agreement for directors and effective as of July 15, 2021, between Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. and Jay Sial.
officers

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on July 19, 2021

Executive Employment Agreement, effective as of September 20, 2021, between Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. and Roger Sidhu.

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2021

Form of Indemnification Agreement

Exhibit10.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 16, 2021

Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2021, between Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on April 30, 2021

Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 26, 2021, between Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on May 26, 2021

Exclusive License Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2021, between Factor Bioscience Limited, Novellus Therapeutics Limited and Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics LLC

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on April 30, 2021

Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. 2021 Inducement StockIncentive Plan

Exhibit to Form 8-K filedon May 26, 2021

Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. Restated 2020 Stock Incentive Plan

Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2021

Lease Agreement, made as of September 28, 2015, between Biobat, Inc. and IRX Therapeutics, LLC

Exhibit to Form S-4/A filed on November 25, 2020

First Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated September 28, 2015

Exhibit to Form S-4/A filed on November 25, 2020
Assignment and Assumption of Lease, made by and between IRX Therapeutics, LLC and Brooklyn, and consented to by Biobat, Inc., as landlord
Exhibit to Form S-4/A filed on November 25, 2020
 
Second Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated July 24, 2019
Exhibit to Form S-4/A filed on November 25, 2020
Sublease Agreement, dated April 18, 2019, between Brooklyn and Nezu Asia Capital Management, LLC
Exhibit to Form S-4/A filed on November 25, 2020
Consent to Sublease and Agreement, dated asSubsidiaries of May 18, 2019, among 654 Madison Avenue Associates LP, Brooklyn, and Nezu Asia Capital Management, LLC
Exhibit to Form S-4/A filed on November 25, 2020
Commencement Date Confirmation Agreement, made as of June 27, 2019, among Brooklyn and Nezu Asia Capital Management, LLC.
Exhibit to Form S-4/A filed on November 25, 2020
Lease Agreement dated June 15, 2021 between Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc. and Fairlane Columbia, LLC
the Company
 
Filed herewith
Subsidiaries of the Company.
Filed herewith.
 
Consent of the Independent Registered Accounting Firm.
Firm, Grant Thornton LLP
 
Filed herewith


Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Filed herewith


Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Filed herewith

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Furnished herewith

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Furnished herewith
Eterna Therapeutics Inc. Clawback Policy
Filed herewith
101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document).

Filed herewith
101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

Filed herewith
101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

Filed herewith
101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

Filed herewith
101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

Filed herewith
101.PRE

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Filed herewith
104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).



(a)*
Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.

(b)**
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2)601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K, portions ofschedules and similar attachments to this exhibit have been omitted because the Company customarily and actually treats the omitted portions as privatethey do not contain information material to an investment or confidential,voting decision and such portions areinformation is not material and would likely cause competitive harm to the Company if publicly disclosed.otherwise disclosed in such exhibit. The Company will supplementally provide a copy of an unredacted copy of this exhibitany omitted schedule or similar attachment to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(c)#Certain identified information has been excluded from
Pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(2), certain exhibits and schedules to this exhibit have been omitted. The Company agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted exhibit or schedule to the SEC upon its request.
^
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K, certain confidential portions of this exhibit were omitted by means of marking such portions with an asterisk because itsuch information is both (i) not material and (ii) would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed.is the type that the Company treats as private or confidential.

ITEM 16.Form 10-K Summary
 
None.


75
67

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 BROOKLYN IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS,
ETERNA THERAPEUTICS INC.
   
Date: April 15, 2022
March 14, 2024
By:
/s/ Howard J. FederoffSandra Gurrola
  Howard J. FederoffSandra Gurrola
  
Chief Executive Officer andSenior Vice President of Finance
(Principal ExecutiveFinancial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name Title Date
     
/s/ Howard J. FederoffSanjeev Luther
 
President, Chief Executive Officer, President and Member of the BoardDirector (Principal Executive Officer)
 
April 15, 2022
 March 14, 2024
Howard J. FederoffSanjeev Luther    
/s/ Sandra Gurrola
 
Senior Vice President of Finance (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
 
April 15, 2022
 March 14, 2024
Sandra Gurrola    
     
/s/ Charles CheringtonJames Bristol
 
 Chairman of the Board
 
April 15, 2022
 March 14, 2024
Charles CheringtonJames Bristol    
     
/s/ Dennis H. Langer Member of the BoardPeter Cicala
 
 Director
April 15, 2022
 March 14, 2024
Dennis H. LangerPeter Cicala    
     
/s/ Erich Mohr Member of the BoardDorothy Clarke
 
 Director
April 15, 2022
 March 14, 2024
Erich MohrDorothy Clarke    
     
/s/ Heather B. Redman Member of the BoardWilliam Wexler
 
April 15, 2022 Director
Heather B. Redman
/s/ Erin S. Enright Member of the Board 
April 15, 2022
 March 14, 2024
Erin S. EnrightWilliam Wexler    

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders, Members and Board of Directors ofand Stockholders
Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics,Eterna Therapeutics Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics,Eterna Therapeutics Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20212023 and 2020,2022, the related consolidatedstatements of operations, stockholders’ and members’ equity, (deficit) and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2021,2023, and the related notes (collectively(collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Companyas of December 31, 20212023 and 2020,2022, and the results of itsoperations and itscash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2021,2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Explanatory Paragraph – Going Concern
concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As more fully describeddiscussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred significant lossesa net loss of $21,668,000 during the year ended December 31, 2023, and needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its operations.had an accumulated deficit of approximately $187,000,000 as of December 31, 2023. These conditions, along with other matters as set forth in Note 2, raise substantial doubt about the Company'sCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management'sManagement’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2.2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Notes 3 and 7 to the financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases in 2020 due to the adoption of the guidance in ASC Topic 842, Leases (“Topic 842”).

Basis for Opinion

opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"(“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical audit matters
Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a mattermatters are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relatesrelate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication ofWe determined that there are no critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.matters.

F-2

Fair Value of Contingent Consideration

Description of the Matter

As discussed in Note 5 to the financial statements, contingent consideration is recorded at fair value at the transaction date and subsequently revalued each reporting period, with changes in the fair value recognized within the statement of operations. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2021, management recorded a contingent consideration liability of $19.9 million and change in fair value of $0.2 million.  Management utilized a third-party valuation specialist to assist in estimating the contingent consideration fair value using the income approach, and the discounted cash flows were used to estimate the expected royalty payments to third parties.

Auditing management’s estimated fair value of contingent consideration is highly subjective and judgmental as the assumptions used in the fair value measurement, including the discount rate, the amount and timing of cash flows, and the forecast of future product sales, are all based on significant inputs not observable in the market.  This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures related to the fair value of contingent consideration and the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the audit evidence obtained.

How we Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

With the assistance of our valuation specialists, our audit procedures included, amongst others:

We obtained an understanding of management’s process in regards to the methodology used and the factors considered around the inputs, sources of data used and assumptions and estimates made in determining the fair value of contingent consideration, including those over management’s review of its third-party specialist valuation report.
We tested the completeness and accuracy of the data used in the discounted cash flow model.
We evaluated the appropriateness of the discounted cash flow model.
We performed a sensitivity analysis on the discount rate used in the discounted cash flow model to determine the impact rate changes could have on the fair value.

/s/ Marcum llp

MarcumGRANT THORNTON LLP

We are uncertainhave served as to the year we began serving consecutively as the auditor of the Company’s financial statements; however, we are aware that we have been the Company’s auditor consecutively since at least 2013.

2022.
New York, NYNew York
April 15, 2022
March 14, 2024

BROOKLYN IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS,ETERNA THERAPEUTICS INC. AND SUBSDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value amount)amounts)

 
December 31,
2021
  
December 31,
2020
  
December 31,
2023
  
December 31,
2022
 
ASSETS       
  
 
Current assets:            
Cash 
$
16,985
  
$
1,630
  
$
7,575
  
$
11,446
 
Accounts receivable  
684
   
0
 
Other receivables  
425
   
951
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  
1,097
   
102
   
1,599
   
1,284
 
Total current assets  
18,766
   
1,732
   
9,599
   
13,681
 
Restricted cash
  4,095   4,095 
Property and equipment, net  
670
   
594
   
493
   
236
 
Right-of-use assets - operating leases  
2,567
   
2,093
   
32,781
   
1,030
 
Goodwill  
2,044
   
2,044
   
2,044
   
2,044
 
In-process research and development  
6,860
   
6,860
 
Investment in minority interest  
1,000
   
0
 
Security deposits and other assets  
522
   
453
 
Investment in non-controlling interest  
-
   
59
 
Other assets  
120
   
1,134
 
Total assets 
$
32,429
  
$
13,776
  
$
49,132
  
$
22,279
 
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ AND MEMBERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:                
Accounts payable 
$
1,755
  
$
1,275
  
$
1,067
  
$
1,620
 
Accrued expenses  
1,249
   
1,051
   
1,893
   
3,626
 
Loans payable  
0
   
410
 
PPP loan, current  
0
   
116
 
Income taxes payable
  2   - 
Operating lease liabilities, current  
426
   
273
   2,216   295 
Due to related party, current
  1,205   1,750 
Deferred revenue, current  
190
   
-
 
Other current liabilities  
247
   
0
   
-
   
363
 
Total current liabilities  
3,677
   
3,125
   
6,573
   
7,654
 
Contingent consideration  
19,930
   
20,110
 
Convertible notes, net  6,773   - 
Warrant liabilities
  116   331 
Operating lease liabilities, non-current  
2,297
   
1,905
   
32,854
   
887
 
PPP loan, non-current  
0
   
194
 
Due to related party, non-current
  -   1,206 
Deferred revenue, non-current
  392   - 
Contingent consideration liability
  107   - 
Other liabilities  
23
   
23
   
84
   
94
 
Total liabilities  
25,927
   
25,357
   
46,899
   
10,172
 
                
Stockholders’ and members’ equity (deficit):
        
Class A membership units  
0
   
23,202
 
Class B membership units  
0
   
1,400
 
Class C membership units  
0
   
1,000
 
Common units  
0
   
198
 
Series A preferred stock, $0.005 par value, $156 liquidation preference, 156 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021; 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020.  
1
   
0
 
Common stock, $0.005 par value, 100,000 shares authorized, 52,021 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021; 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020.
  
260
   
0
 
Stockholder’s equity:        
Preferred stock, $0.005 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, 156 designated and outstanding of Series A convertible preferred stock at December 31, 2023 and 2022, $156 liquidation preference
  
1
   
1
 
Common stock, $0.005 par value, 100,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2023 and 2022; 5,410 and 5,127 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively
  
27
   
26
 
Additional paid-in capital  
165,944
   
0
   
189,186
   
177,377
 
Accumulated deficit  
(159,703
)
  
(37,381
)
  
(186,981
)
  
(165,297
)
Total stockholders’ and members’ equity (deficit)  
6,502
   
(11,581
)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ and members’ equity (deficit) 
$
32,429
  
$
13,776
 
Total stockholders’ equity
  
2,233
   
12,107
 
        
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 
$
49,132
  
$
22,279
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BROOKLYN IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS,
ETERNA THERAPEUTICS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSOPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 Years ended December 31,  Years ended December 31, 
 2023
  2022
 
Revenue
 $68  $- 
Cost of revenues
  236   - 
Gross loss
  (168)  - 
 2021
  2020
         
Operating expenses:
              
Research and development
 
$
12,705
  
$
3,951
   
5,920
   
10,392
 
Acquired in-process research and development
  
80,538
   
0
 
General and administrative
  
14,724
   
3,297
   
14,587
   
16,835
 
Transaction costs
  
5,765
   
0
 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
  
(180
)
  
19,240
 
Acquisition of Exacis in-process research and development
  
460
   
-
 
Impairment of in-process research and development
  -   5,990 
Total operating expenses  
113,552
   
26,488
   
20,967
   
33,217
 
Loss from operations
  
(113,552
)
  
(26,488
)
  
(21,135
)
  
(33,217
)
Other expenses:
        
Loss on sale of NTN assets
  (9,648)  0 
Other income (expense), net
  
899
   
(43
)
Total other expenses, net  
(8,749
)
  
(43
)
        
Other expense, net:
        
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities
  215   10,795 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  118   - 
Loss on non-controlling investment
  (59)  (941)
Interest income
  138   - 
Interest expense
  (614)  (30)
Other expense, net
  
(334
)
  
(1,141
)
Total other (expense) income , net  
(536
)
  
8,683
 
        
Loss before income taxes
  (122,301)  (26,531)  (21,671)  (24,534)
Provision for income taxes
  (5)  0 
Benefit (provision) for income taxes  3   (45)
Net loss
  
(122,306
)
  
(26,531
)
  
(21,668
)
  
(24,579
)
Series A preferred stock dividend
  
(16
)
  
0
 
Series A convertible preferred stock dividend  
(16
)
  
(16
)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(122,322
)
 
$
(26,531
)
 
$
(21,684
)
 
$
(24,595
)
                
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted
 
$
(2.82
)
 
$
(1.51
)
 
$
(4.08
)
 
$
(8.06
)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted
  
43,306
   
17,588
   
5,314
   
3,051
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BROOKLYN IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS,
ETERNA THERAPEUTICS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ AND MEMBERS’ EQUITYEQUITY (DEFICIT)
For the years ended December 31, 20212023 and 20202022
(In thousands)

  Membership Equity  Common Stock  
Series A
Preferred Stock
  Additional
Paid-in
  Accumulated    
  Class A  Class B  Class C  Common  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Total 
                                  
Balances at January 1, 2021 
$
23,202
  
$
1,400
  
$
1,000
  
$
198
   
0
  
$
0
   
0
  
$
0
  
$
0
  
$
(37,381
)
 
$
(11,581
)
Brooklyn rights offerings membership units  
10,500
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
-
   
0
   
-
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
10,500
 
Elimination of Brooklyn’s historical members’ equity  
(33,702
)
  
(1,400
)
  
(1,000
)
  
(198
)
  
-
   
0
   
-
   
0
   
36,300
   
0
   
0
 
Common stock to be retained by NTN stockholders  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
1,514
   
8
   
0
   
0
   
8,170
   
0
   
8,178
 
Issuance of Series A preferred stock retained
by NTN stockholders
  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
156
   
1
   
(1
)
  
0
   
0
 
Issuance of common stock to Brooklyn members  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
38,924
   
195
   
0
   
0
   
(195
)
  
0
   
0
 
Issuance of common stock to Financial Advisor upon
consummation of merger
  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
1,068
   
5
   
0
   
0
   
5,760
   
0
   
5,765
 
Issuance of common stock from the exercise of
stock options
  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
1
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
10
   
0
   
10
 
Issuance of common stock related to stock purchase
agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC, net
  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
3,552
   
17
   
0
   
0
   
52,008
   
0
   
52,025
 
Issuance of common stock in connection with
the acquisition of Novellus, Inc.
  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
7,022
   
35
   
0
   
0
   
58,649
   
0
   
58,684
 
Cash dividends to Series A preferred stockholders  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
(8
)
  
(8
)
Issuance of common stock in lieu of cash
dividend to Series A preferred stockholders
  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
8
   
(8
)
  
0
 
Forfeiture of unvested restricted stock  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
(60
)
  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
 
Stock based compensation  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
-
   
0
   
-
   
0
   
5,235
   
0
   
5,235
 
Net loss  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
-
   
0
   
-
   
0
   
0
   
(122,306
)
  
(122,306
)
Balances at December 31, 2021
 
$
0
  
$
0
  
$
0
  
$
0
   
52,021
  
$
260
   
156
  
$
1
  
$
165,944
  
$
(159,703
)
 
$
6,502
 

  
Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock
  Common Stock  
Additional Paid-
in
  Accumulated    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Total 
Balances at January 1, 2022
  
156
  
$
1
   
2,601
  
$
13
  
$
166,191
  
$
(140,702
)
 
$
25,503
 
Issuance of common stock in connection with private offering  
-
   
-
   
275
   
1
   
(1
)
  
-
   
-
 
Issuance of common stock from vested restricted stock units  
-
   
-
   
2
   
-
   
(5
)
  
-
   
(5
)
Issuance of common stock and warrants in connection with November 2022 private offering, net.  
-
   
-
   
2,185
   
12
   
7,383
   
-
   
7,395
 
Forfeiture of unvested restricted stock  
-
   
-
   
(4
)
  
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Cash dividends to Series A convertible preferred stockholders  
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(16
)
  
(16
)
Stock-based compensation  
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
2,935
   
-
   
2,935
 
Net loss  
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(24,579
)
  
(24,579
)
                             
Balances at January 1, 2023
  
156
  
$
1
   
5,127
  
$
26
  
$
177,377
  
$
(165,297
)
 
$
12,107
 
Issuance of common stock in connection with Exacis asset acquisition
  
-
   
-
   
69
   
-
   
208
   
-
   
208
 
Issuance of common stock related to stock purchase agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC, net
  
-
   
-
   
214
   
1
   
579
   
-
   
580
 
Issuance of note warrants  
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
9,014
   
-
   
9,014
 
Repricing of warrants in connection with December 2023 financing  
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
766
   
-
   
766
 
Cash dividends to Series A convertible preferred stockholders  
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(16
)
  
(16
)
Stock-based compensation  
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,242
   
-
   
1,242
 
Net loss  
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(21,668
)
  
(21,668
)
Balances at December 31, 2023
  
156
  
$
1
   
5,410
  
$
27
  
$
189,186
  
$
(186,981
)
 
$
2,233
 
  Membership Equity  Accumulated    
  Class A  Class B  Class C  Common  Deficit  Total 
                   
Balances at January 1, 2020 
$
18,178
  
$
1,400
  
$
1,000
  
$
107
  
$
(10,942
)
 
$
9,743
 
Implementation of new accounting principle
  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
92
   
92
 
Stock based compensation
  
0
   
0
   
0
   
91
   
0
   
91
 
Sale of members’ equity
  
5,024
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
5,024
 
Net loss
  
0
   
0
   
0
   
0
   
(26,531
)
  
(26,531
)
Balances at December 31, 2020 
$
23,202
  
$
1,400
  
$
1,000
  
$
198
  
$
(37,381
)
 
$
(11,581
)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BROOKLYN IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS,ETERNA THERAPEUTICS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

  
For years ended
December 31,
 
  2021
  2020
 
Cash flows used in operating activities:
      
Net loss 
$
(122,306
)
 
$
(26,531
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  
117
   
98
 
Stock-based compensation  
5,235
   
91
 
Amortization of right-to-use asset  
342
   
0
 
Transaction costs - shares to Financial Advisor  
5,765
   
0
 
Loss on sale of NTN assets  
9,648
   
0
 
Loss on disposal of fixed assets  
13
   
0
 
Gain on forgiveness of PPP loan  
(310
)
  
0
 
Acquired in-process research and development  
80,538
   
0
 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  
(180
)
  
19,240
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Account receivable  
(659
)
  
0
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  
(850
)
  
(16
)
Security deposits and other non-current assets  
(34
)
  
(90
)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  
(485
)
  
(930
)
Operating lease liability  
(322
)
  
12
 
Other liabilities  
0
   
25
 
Net cash used in operating activities  
(23,488
)
  
(8,101
)
Cash flows used in investing activities:
        
Purchase of property and equipment  
(154
)
  
(39
)
Purchase of NTN, net of cash acquired  
147
   
0
 
Purchase of Novellus, net of common stock issued and cash acquired  
(22,854
)
  
0
 
Proceeds from the sale of NTN assets, net of cash disposed  
119
   
0
 
Net cash used in investing activities  
(22,742
)
  
(39
)
Cash flows provided by financing activities:
        
Net proceeds of common stock issued to Lincoln Park  
52,025
   
0
 
Proceeds from sale of members’ equity  
10,500
   
4,359
 
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options  
10
   
0
 
Proceeds from loans payable  
0
   
310
 
Repayment of NTN’s PPP loan
  
(532
)
  
0
 
Principal payments on notes payable  
(410
)
  
0
 
Dividends paid to Series A preferred shareholders  
(8
)
  
0
 
Net cash provided by financing activities  
61,585
   
4,669
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  
15,355
   
(3,471
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
  
1,630
   
5,101
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 
$
16,985
  
$
1,630
 
         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
        
Cash paid during the period for:        
Interest 
$
225
  
$
0
 
Income taxes 
$
1
  
$
0
 
         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
        
Issuance of common stock for Series A preferred stock dividend 
$
8
  
$
0
 
Issuance of common stock for business combination 
$
8,178
  
$
0
 
Issuance of common Stock for Novellus acquisition 
$
58,684
  
$
0
 
Forfeiture of unvested restricted stock 
$
0
  
$
0
 
Preferred shares issued in connection with reverse merger 
$
1
  
$
0
 
Initial measurement of ROU assets, net of tenant improvement allowance 
$
816
  
$
0
 
Initial measurement of operating lease liabilities 
$
866
  
$
0
 
Investor deposits for sale of members’ equity 
$
0
  
$
666
 
Right of use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities 
$
0
  
$
2,093
 
  For years ended 
  December 31, 
  2023
  2022
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
      
Net loss 
$
(21,668
)
 
$
(24,579
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  
84
   
161
 
Stock-based compensation  
1,242
   
2,935
 
Commitment shares issued to Lincoln Park Capital, LLC
  249   - 
Loss on shares sold to Lincoln Park Capital, LLC
  11   - 
Amortization of right-of-use asset  
1,039
   
336
 
Impairment of right-of-use asset  -   772 
Non-cash component of acquisition of Exacis in-process research and development
  433   - 
Gain on remeasurement of operating lease liability and right-of-use-asset
  -   (642)
Impairment of in-process research and development
  -   5,990 
Loss on disposal of fixed assets  
1
   
280
 
Gain on lease termination  -   (85)
Accrued interest expense
  176   - 
Paid-in-kind interest expense
  113   - 
Amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs
  303   - 
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities  (215)  (10,795)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability
  (118)  - 
Loss on non-controlling investment  59   941 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Other receivables  527   
(262
)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  
(556
)
  
(187
)
Other non-current assets  1,014   
(646
)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  
(2,898
)
  
2,034
 
Operating lease liability  
1,338
   
(340
)
Due to related party
  (1,750)  2,956 
Deferred revenue
  582   - 
Other liabilities  
(374
)
  
155
 
Net cash used in operating activities  
(20,408
)
  
(20,976
)
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Purchase of property and equipment  
(19
)
  
(297
)
Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets  -   250 
Net cash used in investing activities  
(19
)
  
(47
)
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds received from the convertible notes financings
  16,503   - 
Fees paid related to the Convertible Notes Financings
  (251)  - 
Proceeds received under promissory note
  1,500   - 
Principal payment made on promissory note
  (1,500)  - 
Proceeds from sale of common stock pursuant to stock purchase agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC
  320   - 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants in connection with private offering  -   19,706 
Fees paid in connection with private offering
  -   (110)
Issuance of common stock from exercise of pre-funded warrants
  -   7 
Payroll tax remitted on net share settlement of equity awards
  -   (5)
Dividends paid to Series A convertible preferred stockholders  (16)  (16)
Cash paid for fractional shares in connection with reverse stock split  -   (1)
Principal payments on finance leases  
-
   
(2
)
Net cash provided by financing activities  
16,556
   
19,579
 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  
(3,871
)
  
(1,444
)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period  
15,541
   
16,985
 
Cash, cash equivalents and restrictd cash at end of period 
$
11,670
  
$
15,541
 
         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
Cash paid during the period for:        
         
Interest 
$
20
  
$
30
 
Income taxes 
$
4
  
$
15
 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Contingent consideration for Exacis asset acquisition $225  $- 
Issuance of common stock for Exacis asset acquisition $208  $- 
Note warrants issued $9,219  $- 
Repricing of warrants in connection with December 2023 financing $766  $- 
Unpaid fees incurred in connection with the December 2023 financing $116  $- 
Paid-in-kind interest added to convertible notes principal $113  $- 
Initial measurement of ROU assets $34,410  $1,706 
Initial measurement of lease liabilities $34,170  $1,706 
Adjustment to lease liability and ROU asset due to remeasurement $(1,620) $- 
Accrual for purchases of property and equipment $323  $- 
Conversion of warrant liability to equity $-  $867 
Unpaid fees incurred in connction with November 2022 private offering
 $-  $208 
Initial measurement of finance lease liabilities $-  $10 

        
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period:        
Cash and cash equivalents $7,575  $11,446 
Restricted cash  4,095   4,095 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restriced cash at end of period $11,670  $15,541 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BROOKLYN IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS,
ETERNA THERAPEUTICS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 20212023 and 20202022

1)Organization and Description of Business Operations

Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics

Eterna Therapeutics Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Brooklyn” or the “Company”), together with its subsidiaries including Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics LLC (“Brooklyn LLC”), Novellus, Inc. (“Novellus”) and Novellus Therapeutics, Ltd. (“Novellus, Ltd.”), is a clinical stage biopharmaceuticallife science company focused on exploringcommitted to realizing the role that cytokine,potential of mRNA cell engineering to provide patients with transformational new medicines.  Eterna has in-licensed a portfolio of over 100 patents covering key mRNA cell engineering technologies, including technologies for mRNA cell reprogramming, mRNA gene editing, the NoveSliceTM and UltraSliceTM gene-editing proteins, and the ToRNAdoTM mRNA delivery system, which Eterna collectively refers to as our “mRNA technology platform.” Eterna refers to aspects of its mRNA technology platform as “mRNA delivery,” “mRNA gene editing” and “mRNA cell therapy can have in treating patients with cancer, blood disorders and monogenic diseases.reprogramming.” Eterna licenses its mRNA technology platform from Factor Bioscience Limited (“Factor Limited”) under an exclusive license agreement. As used herein, the “Company” or “Eterna” refers collectively to BrooklynEterna and its subsidiaries.

On August 12, 2020, Brooklyn (then known as “NTN Buzztime, Inc.”), Brooklynconsolidated subsidiaries (Eterna LLC, Novellus, Inc. and BIT Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Brooklyn (the “Merger Sub”), entered into an agreement and plan of merger and reorganization (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which, among other matters, Merger Sub merged with and into Brooklyn LLC, with Brooklyn LLC continuing as a wholly owned subsidiary of Brooklyn and asNovellus Therapeutics Limited) unless otherwise stated or the surviving company of the merger (the “Merger”). The Merger closed on March 25, 2021. After the Merger, Brooklyn changed its name from “NTN Buzztime, Inc.” to “Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc.” The Merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, in which Brooklyn LLC was deemed the acquiring company for accounting purposes.context otherwise requires.

On March 26, 2021, Brooklyn sold (the “Disposition”) its rights, title and interest in and to the assets relating to the business operated under the name “NTN Buzztime, Inc.” prior to the Merger to eGames.com Holdings LLC (“eGames.com”) in accordance with the terms of an asset purchase agreement dated September 18, 2020, as amended, between Brooklyn and eGames.com (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”). (See Note 4.)


On July 16, 2021, Brooklyn and its newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary Brooklyn Acquisition Sub, Inc. entered into an agreement and plan of acquisition (the “Acquisition Agreement”) with (a) Novellus LLC, (b) Novellus (the sole equity holder of Novellus, Ltd. and, prior to the closing under the Acquisition Agreement, a wholly owned subsidiary of Novellus, LLC), and (c) a seller representative (the “Acquisition”), pursuant to which Brooklyn acquired Novellus and its subsidiary, Novellus, Ltd. As part of the Acquisition, Brooklyn also acquired 25.0% of the total outstanding equity interests of NoveCite, Inc. (“NoveCite”), a corporation focused on developing an allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell product for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, including from COVID-19. (See Note 4.)

2)Liquidity and Capital Resources


The Company has incurred significant operating losses and has an accumulated deficit as a result of ongoingits efforts to develop product candidates, including conducting clinical trials and providing general and administrative support for these operations. As of December 31, 2021,2023, the Company had aan unrestricted cash balance of approximately $16,985,000$7.6 million and an accumulated deficit of approximately $159,703,000.$187.0 million. For the year ended December 31, 2021,2023, the Company incurred a net loss of $122,306,000$21.7 million, and the Company used cash of $20.4 million in operating activities of $23,488,000 (inclusive of $80,538,000 IPR&D expense related toactivities.


 In October 2022, the Acquisition, $9,648,000 related to the loss on sale of assets in the Disposition and $180,000 related to the change in fair value of contingent consideration).

On April 26, 2021, BrooklynCompany entered into a common stocksublease for approximately 45,500 square feet of office and laboratory space in Somerville, Massachusetts.  Pursuant to the sublease, the Company delivered to the sublessor a security deposit in the form of a letter of credit in the amount of $4.1 million, which will be reduced on an incremental basis throughout the term of the sublease.  The letter of credit was issued by the Company’s commercial bank, which required that the Company cash collateralize the letter of credit by depositing $4.1 million in a restricted cash account with such bank.  The amount of required restricted cash collateral will decline in parallel with the reduction in the amount of the letter of credit over the term of the sublease.



In April 2023, the Company entered into a standby equity purchase agreement (the “First Purchase Agreement”“SEPA”) and a registration rights agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC (“Lincoln Park”), pursuant to which provided that Brooklyn could offer to Lincoln Park committed to purchase up to an aggregate$10.0 million of $20,000,000 ofthe Company’s common stock over a 36-month period commencing after May 10, 2021,in an “equity line” financing arrangement. During the date that a registration statement coveringyear ended December 31, 2023, the resale ofCompany issued and sold approximately 214,000 shares of common stock issued under the First Purchase Agreement was declared effective bySEPA for gross proceeds of $0.3 million.



In July and December 2023, the SEC. As of December 31, 2021, Brooklyn had issued and sold an aggregate of approximately 1,128,000 shares of common stock to Lincoln Park pursuant to the First Purchase Agreement, resultingCompany received $16.5 million in gross proceeds from the issuance of $20,000,000.
convertible notes and in January 2024 received an additional $1.4 million in gross proceeds from the issuance of additional convertible notes. See Notes 6 and 18 for additional information regarding these financings.

On May 26, 2021, Brooklyn entered into a second common stock purchase agreement (the “Second Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park, which provides that Brooklyn may offer to Lincoln Park up to an aggregate of $40,000,000 of common stock over a 36-month period commencing after June 4, 2021, the date that a registration statement covering the resale of shares of common stock issued under the Second Purchase Agreement was declared effective by the SEC. As of December 31, 2021, Brooklyn had issued and sold an aggregate of approximately 2,424,000 shares of common stock to Lincoln Park pursuant to the Second Purchase Agreement, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $34,106,000.

On July 16, 2021, Brooklyn used approximately $22,854,000 of cash, net of cash acquired, as part of the purchase price of the Acquisition. Brooklyn issued common stock as the remaining portion of the purchase price of the Acquisition.


On March 9, 2022, we consummated a private placement of equity resulting in net proceeds of approximately $11 million. See Note 17 for details.

In connection with preparing itsthe accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021,2023, the Company’s management concluded that there is substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern because it does not expect to have sufficient cash or working capital resources to fund operations for the twelve-month period subsequent to the issuance date of these consolidated financial statements. The Company will need to raise additional capital, which could be through the remaining availabilitysales of shares of its common stock under the Second Purchase Agreement (to the extent the Company is permitted to use such agreement),SEPA, public or private equity offerings, debt financings, corporate collaborationsout-licensing the Company’s intellectual property, strategic partnerships or other means. The Company may also seek governmental grants to support our clinical trials and preclinical trials..  TheOther than the SEPA, the Company currently has no arrangements for such capital, and no assurances can be given that it will be able to raise such capital when needed, on acceptable terms, or at all.


The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result from uncertainty related to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

3)Basis of Accounting Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


Basis of Accounting Presentation


The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to GAAP as found in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

As described above, the Merger closed on March 25, 2021. The Merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, in which Brooklyn LLC was deemed the acquiring company for accounting purposes. Brooklyn LLC’s historical financial statements have replaced Brooklyn’s historical financial statements with respect to periods prior to the completion of the Merger (when Brooklyn operated under the name “NTN Buzztime, Inc.”). The Company retrospectively adjusted the weighted average shares used in determining loss per common share to reflect the conversion of the outstanding Class A units, Class B units, Class C units, and common units of Brooklyn LLC that converted into shares of Brooklyn’s common stock upon the Merger and to reflect the effect of a 2-to-1 reverse stock split of Brooklyn’s common stock that occurred immediately prior to the Merger.

Also as described above, the Acquisition closed on July 16, 2021. The Acquisition was accounted for as an asset acquisition, and substantially all of the value was attributed to in-process research and development (“IPR&D”), with the exception of the cash paid for the investment in NoveCite, which is being accounted for as an investment in equity securities. The IPR&D had no alternative future uses and no separate economic value from its originally intended purpose and was therefore expensed in the period the cost was incurred.


Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


Use of Estimates


The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affectaffect: (a) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities; (b) disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements; (c) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periodperiod; and (d) the reported amount of the fair value of assets acquired in connection with business combinations. Actual results could differ fromOn an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those estimates. The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions includerelated to the recoverability and useful lives of long-lived assetsassets; stock-based compensation assumptions; valuation assumptions of warrants; contingencies; contingent consideration and the contingent consideration liability.provision for income taxes, including the valuation allowance. The Company bases its estimates on a combination of historical experience and various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates.

Cash, and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash


The Company classifies highly liquid investments with a remaining contractual maturity at date of purchase of three months or less as cash equivalents. The Company had 0no cash equivalents as of December 31, 20212023 or 2020.2022.


Restricted cash consists of a cash collateralization of $4.1 million for a security deposit in the form of a letter of credit issued by the Company’s commercial bank and delivered to the sublessor of office and laboratory space the Company subleases in Somerville, Massachusetts. The amount of required restricted cash collateral will decline in parallel with the reduction in the amount of the letter of credit over the term of the sublease.

Property and Equipment


Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Laboratory and manufacturing equipment are depreciated over an estimated useful life of seven years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful life, or the lease term. Furniture and fixtures are depreciated over an estimated useful life of five years.  Computer equipment are depreciated over an estimated useful life of three years. Upon retirement or other disposition of these assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation of these assets are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or losses are reflected in the results of operations. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations. Renewals and betterments are capitalized.

Goodwill


Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in the acquisition of IRX Therapeutics, Inc. (“IRX”) in November 2018, (the “IRX Acquisition”), which was accounted for as a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Because management evaluates the Company as a single reporting unit, goodwill is tested for impairment at the entity level by first performing a qualitative assessment to determine whetherindicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of the entitya reporting unit is less than  its carrying value. Such qualitative factorsEvents that would indicate impairment and trigger an interim impairment assessment include, but are not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance and other relevant events.  IfManagement evaluates the Company as a single reporting unit, therefore, goodwill is tested for impairment at the entity does not pass thelevel. Goodwill is tested for impairment as of December 31st of each year, or more frequently as warranted by events or changes in circumstances mentioned above.  Accounting guidance also permits an optional qualitative assessment then the entity’s carrying valuefor goodwill to determine whether it is compared to its fair value. Goodwill is considered impaired ifmore likely than not that the carrying value of the entitya reporting unit exceeds its fair value. If, after this qualitative assessment, the Company determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then no further quantitative testing would be necessary. A quantitative assessment is performed if the qualitative assessment results in a more likely than not determination or if a qualitative assessment is not performed. The quantitative assessment considers whether the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, in which case an impairment charge is recorded to the extent the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value.

In-Process Research & Development


In-process research and development (“IPR&D&D”) assets represent the fair value assigned to technologies that were acquired in connection with the acquisition of IRX Acquisition,in November 2018, which have not reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use. IPR&D assets are considered to be indefinite lived until the completion or abandonment of the associated research and development projects. During the period that the IPR&D assets are considered indefinite-lived, they are tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if the Company becomes aware of any events occurring or changes in circumstances that indicate that the fair value of the IPR&D assets are less than their carrying amounts. If and when development is complete, which generally occurs upon regulatory approval, and the Company is able to commercialize products associated with the IPR&D assets, these assets are then deemed definite-lived and are amortized based on their estimated useful lives beginning at that point in time. If development is terminated or abandoned, the Company may have a full or partial impairment charge related to the IPR&D assets, calculated as the excess of carrying value of the IPR&D assets over fair value.

F-8Revenue Recognition

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews long-lived assetsrecognizes the related revenue under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). Under ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue when a customer obtains control of promised services or goods in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.
 

In general, the Company applies the following steps when recognizing revenue from contracts with customers: (i) identify the contract, (ii) identify the performance obligations, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations and (v) recognize revenue when a performance obligation is satisfied. Recognition of revenue is driven by satisfaction of the performance obligations using one of two methods: revenue is either recognized over time or at a point in time. Contracts containing multiple performance obligations classify those performance obligations into separate units of account either as standalone or combined units of account. Allocation of revenue to individual elements that qualify for separate accounting is based on the separate selling prices determined for each component, and total contract consideration is then allocated across the components of the arrangement. If separate selling prices are not available, the Company will use its best estimate of such selling prices, consistent with the overall pricing strategy and after consideration of relevant market factors.


The Company estimates the amount of consideration it expects to recognize as revenue that is not probable of having a significant reversal of such recognized revenue, and it places a constraint on the remaining contractual consideration. As it becomes evident that the constrained amounts are no longer at risk of a significant reversal of revenue, the Company will remove the constraint from the related revenue and recognize a cumulative catch-up adjustment to revenue in the period in which the constraint was removed.


The Company has one revenue generating contract. Such contract relates to an option and license agreement as well as certain identifiable assets for impairment whenever circumstances and situations change such that theredevelopment activities.  See Note 5.

Contract Assets:


A contract asset is an indicationentity’s right to payment for goods and services already transferred to a customer if that right to payment is conditional on something other than the carrying amounts may not be recovered. An impairment existspassage of time. Generally, an entity will recognize a contract asset when the carrying valueit has fulfilled a contract obligation but must perform other obligations before being entitled to payment. Contract assets consist primarily of the long-lived asset is not recoverablecost of project contract work performed by third parties whereby the Company expects to recognize any related revenue at a later date, upon satisfaction of the contract obligations. The Company had no contract assets as of December 31, 2023 or 2022.



Contract Liabilities:


Contract liabilities consist primarily of consideration received, usually in the form of payment, on project work to be performed whereby the Company expects to recognize any related revenue at a later date, upon satisfaction of the contract obligations. As of December 31, 2023, contract liabilities were $0.6 million and exceeds its fair value. Forare recognized as deferred revenue in the yearsaccompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company recognized $0.1 million of revenue during the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, there2023 from contract liabilities that arose in 2023. There were no qualitative factors that indicated it was more likely than not that the fair valuecontract liabilities as of the long-lived assets exceeded the carrying value.December 31, 2022.

Research and Development


The Company expenses its research and development costs as incurred. Research and development expenses consist of costs incurred for company-sponsored research and development activities, as well as support for selected investigator-sponsored research. Upfront payments and milestone payments made for the licensing of technology are expensed as research and development in the period in which they are incurred if the technology is not expected to have any alternative future uses other than the specific research and development project for which it was intended. IPR&D that is acquired through an asset acquisition (as opposed to a business combination) and has no alternative future uses and, therefore, no separate economic values, is expensed to research and development costs at the time the costs are incurred.


The major components of research and development costs include preclinical study costs, clinical manufacturing costs, clinical study and trial expenses, insurance coverage for clinical trials, expensed licensed technology, expensed IPR&D, consulting, scientific advisors and other third-party costs, salaries and employee benefits, stock-based compensation expense, supplies and materials, preclinical study costs, expensed licensed technology, consulting, scientific advisors and other third-party costs, and allocations of various overhead costs related to our product development efforts.

In the normal course
F-9


The Company contractshas contracted with third parties to perform various clinical study and trial activities in the on-going development and testing of potential products.studies. The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation and vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven payment flows. The Company accrues for third party expenses based on estimates of the services received and efforts expended during the reporting period. If the actual timing of the performance of the services or the level of effort varies from the estimate, the accrual is adjusted accordingly. The expenses for some third-party services may be recognized on a straight-line basis if the expected costs are expected to be incurred ratably during the period. Payments under the contracts depend on factors such as the achievement of certain events or milestones, the successful enrollment of patients, the allocation of responsibilities among the parties to the agreement, and the completion of portions of the clinical study or trial or similar conditions. Preclinical and clinical study and trial associated activities such as production and testing of clinical material require significant up-front expenditures. The Company anticipates paying significant portions of a study’s or trial’s cost before they begin and incurring additional expenditures as the study or trial progresses and reaches certain milestones.

Income Taxes
 

The Company records deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the differences between the consolidated financial statements carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect in the years the differences are expected to reverse and establishedestablishing a valuation allowance when it was more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets would not be realized. Income tax expense consists of the tax payable for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.


Tax benefits from uncertain tax positions are recognized only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. The Company has no material uncertain tax positions for any of the reporting periods presented.

EarningsLoss Per Share
 
Basic
The Company calculates basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders in conformity with the two-class method required for participating securities.  The Company’s convertible notes contractually entitle the holders of such notes to participate in dividends but does not contractually require the holders to participate in the Company’s losses.  As such, the two-class method is not applicable during periods with a net loss.



Basic net loss per share have been computedis calculated by dividing the losses applicablenet loss attributable to common stockstockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The Company’s basic and fully diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) calculation are the same since the increasedweighted-average number of shares that would beof common stock outstanding during the period, without consideration for potentially dilutive securities. Diluted net loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus dilutive securities.  Shares of common stock issuable upon exercise, conversion or vesting of stock options, restricted stock units, warrants and the outstanding Series A convertible preferred stock are considered potential shares of common stock and are included in the calculation of diluted calculation from assumed exercisenet loss per share using the treasury method when their effect is dilutive. The Company’s convertible notes are also considered potential shares of common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive toand are included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share using the “if-converted” method, and the more dilutive of either the two-class method or the if-converted method is reported.  Diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share for periods in eachwhich the effect of the years shown in the consolidated financial statements.potentially dilutive shares of common stock is antidilutive.

Segment Reporting
 
In
The Company’s chief operating decision maker, who is the chief executive officer, reviews operating results on a consolidated basis to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance of the Company.  As a result, in accordance with ASC No. 280, Segment Reporting,, the Company has determined that it operates as 1one operating segment. Decisions regarding the Company’s overall operating performance and allocation of its resources are assessed on a consolidated basis.

Concentration of Credit Risk


The Company maintains its cash balances in financial institutions located in the United States. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000. At times, theThe Company’s cash balances may beare uninsured for deposit accounts that exceed the FDIC insurance limit.


In the Company’s business, vendor concentrations could be indicative of vulnerabilities in the Company’s supply chain, which could ultimately impact the Company’s ability to continue its research and development activities. For the years ended December 31, 20212023 and 2020,2022, there was no vendor concentration related to the Company’s research and development activities.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments


Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between willing market participants. A fair value hierarchy has been established for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:


•     Level 1 Inputs – Valued based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
 

•     Level 2 Inputs – Valued based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.
 

•     Level 3 Inputs – Valued based on inputs for which there is little or no market value, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
 

The carrying amounts reported on the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,other receivables, prepaid assets and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, other current liabilities and other liabilities approximate fair value based due to their short maturities. The carrying value of loans payable approximates its fair market value because the effective yield on this debt, which includes contractual interest rates as well as other finance charges, is comparable to rates of returns for instruments of similar credit risk.

Leases


The Company adoptedaccounts for its leases under ASC Topic 842, Leases,Leases. on December 31, 2020 using the modified transition method without retrospective application to comparative periods. The Company elected the package of three practical expedients allowed for under the transition guidance. Accordingly, the Company did not reassess: (1) whether any expired or existing contracts are/or contain leases; (2) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; or (3) initial direct costs for any existing leases. The Company has also elected not to recognize right-of-use assets (“ROU assets”) and lease liabilities for short-term leases that have a term of 12 months or less.

Operating lease liabilities represent the present value of lease payments not yet paid. ROURight-of-use (“ROU”) assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset and are based upon the operating lease liabilities adjusted for prepaid or accrued lease payments, initial direct costs, lease incentives and impairment of operating lease assets. If the interest rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable, the Company uses the incremental borrowing rates based on the information available atfor collateralized borrowings in an amount equal to the lease commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. To determine the present value of lease payments not yet paid, the Company estimates secured borrowing rates corresponding to the maturities of the leases.under similar terms.


The Company has elected the practical expedient to not separate non-lease components from the lease components to which they relate and instead account for each as a single lease component for all underlying asset classes. Some leasing arrangements require variable payments that are dependent on usage or may vary for other reasons, such as payments for insurance, tax payments and other miscellaneous costs. The variable portion of payments contemplated in the lease payments isthat do not depend on an index or rate are not included in the ROU assets or lease liabilities. Rather, variable payments other than those dependent uponthat do not depend on an index or rate are expensed when the obligation for those payments is incurred and are included in lease expenses. Accordingly, all expenses associated with a lease contract are accounted for as lease expenses.


The Company has also elected not to recognize ROU and lease liabilities for short-term leases that have a term of 12 months or less.



The Company accounts for lease modifications as a separate contract when the modification (i) grants the lessee an additional right of use not included in the original lease contract, and (ii) increases the lease payments commensurate with the stand-alone price for the additional right of use.  In this case, the Company would be treated as a new lease and measured in accordance with ASC 842 at the commencement date of the new lease without any impact on the existing lease.  Otherwise, the Company accounts for lease modifications as a continuance of the existing lease, in which case, the Company reassesses the lease classification, remeasures the lease liability using an updated discount rate, and unless there is a full or partial termination of the lease, adjusts the ROU asset by the amount of change to the lease liability.  For a full or partial lease termination, the lessee reduces the carrying amount of the ROU asset on a basis proportionate to the full or partial termination of the lease, and any difference between the adjustment to the ROU asset and the lease liability is recognized as a gain or loss in the current period.

Commitment and Contingencies


The Company follows ASC No.450-20, Loss Contingencies,, to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties, and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

Stock-Based Compensation


The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for equity awards granted to employees, directors and certain consultants. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of stock options granted is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. Stock-based compensation expenseperiod on a straight-line basis.

Warrants


The Company accounts for share-based payment awardscommon stock warrants as either equity-classified or liability-classified instruments based on an assessment of the specific terms of the warrants and applicable authoritative guidance in ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The assessment considers whether the warrants are freestanding financial instruments pursuant to ASC 480, meet the definition of a liability pursuant to ASC 480, or meet all of the requirements for equity classification under ASC 815, including whether the warrants are indexed to the Company’s own stock and whether the holders of the warrants could potentially require net cash settlement in a circumstance outside of the Company’s control, among other conditions for equity classification. This assessment, which requires the use of professional judgment, is recognizedconducted at the time of warrant issuance and as of each subsequent quarterly period end date while the warrants are outstanding.

Convertible Notes


The Company accounts for its convertible notes as a long-term liability equal to the proceeds received from issuance, including the embedded conversion feature, plus any interest paid-in-kind, net of the unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discount on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company evaluates all embedded features contained in the convertible notes, such as the conversion feature, the paid-in-kind feature and the redemption feature in the event of a default, to determine if such features require bifurcation as a derivative. The conversion feature included in the convertible notes is not required to be accounted for separately as an embedded derivative because the conversion feature is considered both indexed to the Company’s own stock and qualifies to be classified in stockholders’ equity. The paid-in-kind feature is considered to be a commitment to originate a loan, and the terms of the additional loans have the same terms as the original debt instrument. Therefore, the paid-in-kind feature qualifies for the scope exception under the applicable accounting guidance and is not required to be bifurcated as a derivative. The redemption feature in the event of a default was determined to be clearly and closely related to the convertible notes and not required to be bifurcated as a derivative.


Proceeds from the sale of convertible notes with stock purchase warrants are allocated to the two elements based on their relative fair values. The portion of the proceeds allocated to warrants are recorded as a debt discount to the convertible note proceeds and presented on a net basis in the consolidated balance sheet. Debt issuance costs directly attributable to the transaction are capitalized and allocated to the convertible notes and warrants in the same manner as the proceeds. The amount of debt issuance costs allocated to the convertible notes represent a reduction of the face value of the convertible note proceeds. The Company amortizes debt issuance costs and debt discounts over the contractual term of the convertible notes, using the straight-line single-option method.effective interest method, as interest expense on the consolidated statements of operations.

Recent Accounting Standards


In May 2021,June 2022, the Financial Accounting StandardsStandard Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2021-04, Earnings Per ShareNo. 2022-03, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 260), Debt—Modifications820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions (“ASU 2022-03”). The FASB issued ASU 2022-03 to (1) clarify the guidance in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, when measuring the fair value of an equity security subject to contractual restrictions that prohibit the sale of an equity security, (2) to amend a related illustrative example, and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718),(3) to introduce new disclosure requirements for equity related securities subject to contractual sale restrictions that are measured at fair value in accordance with Topic 820. ASU 2022-03 clarifies that a contractual restriction on the sale of an equity security is not considered part of the unit of account of the equity security and, Derivatives and Hedging—Contractstherefore, is not considered in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options. ASU 2021-04 addresses the accounting for certain modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options. ASU 2021-04measuring fair value. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021 (January 1, 2022 for the Company)2023, and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoptiona material impact to its consolidated financial statements as a result of adopting this update to have a significant impact on its financial statements.ASU.


In July 2021,October 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2021-05, Leases (Topic 842)No. 2023-06, Disclosure ImprovementsLessors - Certain LeasesCodification Amendment in Response to the SEC’s Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative. This ASU modified the disclosure and presentation requirements of a variety of codification topics by aligning them with Variable Lease Payments,the SEC’s regulations.  The amendments to the various topics should be applied prospectively, and the effective date will be determined for each individual disclosure based on the effective date of the SEC’s removal of the related disclosure.  If the SEC has not removed the applicable requirements from Regulation S-X or Regulation S-K by June 30, 2027, then this ASU will not become effective.  Early adoption is prohibited.  The Company does not expect the amendments in this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.


In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, Segment Reporting – Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, which amends the lessor classification guidanceprovides updates to introduce additional criteria when classifying leases with variable lease payments that do not depend on a reference index or a rate. This guidancequalitative and quantitative reportable segment disclosure requirements, including enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses and increased interim disclosure requirements, among others. ASU No. 2023-07 is effective for annual periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021 (January 1, 20222023, and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted, and the amendments should be applied retrospectively. The Company does not expect the amendments in this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.


In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires disclosure of disaggregated income taxes paid, prescribes standard categories for the Company),components of the effective tax rate reconciliation, and modifies other income tax-related disclosures. ASU No. 2023-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 and allows for adoption on a prospective basis, with earlya retrospective option. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption ofamendments in this updateASU to have a significantmaterial impact on its consolidated financial statements.


4)Merger, Disposition andAsset Acquisition Transactions

Merger

On August 12, 2020, Brooklyn, Brooklyn LLC and
In April 2023, the Merger SubCompany entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Exacis Purchase Agreement”), with Exacis Biotherapeutics Inc. (“Exacis”), the Merger Agreement. The Merger closed on March 25, 2021. Afterstockholders party thereto and, with respect to specified provisions therein, Factor Limited (the “Exacis Acquisition”). Pursuant to the Merger, Brooklyn changed its nameExacis Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired from “NTN Buzztime, Inc.” to “Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, Inc.” The Merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, in which Brooklyn LLC was deemed the acquiring company for accounting purposes. Brooklyn LLC, as the accounting acquirer, recorded the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Brooklyn in the Merger at their fair values as of the acquisition date. Brooklyn’s common stock trades on the NYSE American stock exchange under the ticker symbol “BTX”.


Brooklyn LLC was determined to be the accounting acquirer based upon the terms of the Merger and other factors including that (i) Brooklyn LLC members, received common stock in the Merger that represented 96.35% of Brooklyn’s outstanding common stock on a fully diluted basis as of immediately after the Merger, (ii)Exacis substantially all of the directorsExacis’ intellectual property assets (the “Exacis Assets”), including all of Brooklyn immediately after the Merger were designated by Brooklyn LLC under the terms of the Merger Agreement and (iii) existing members of Brooklyn LLC’s management became the management of Brooklyn immediately after the Merger.

At the closing of the Merger, all the outstanding membership interests of Brooklyn LLC converted into theExacis’ right, to receive an aggregate of approximately 39,992,000 shares of common stock, of which 1,068,000 shares were issued as compensation to Maxim Group LLC, Brooklyn LLC’s financial advisor (the “Financial Advisor”) for its services to Brooklyn LLC in connection with the Merger.

The purchase price of $8,178,000, which represents the consideration transferred in the Merger to stockholders of Brooklyn immediately before the Merger, was calculated based on the closing price of $5.40 per share for approximately 1,514,000 shares common stock that those stockholders owned on March 25, 2021 immediately prior to the Merger because that represented a more reliable measure of the fair value of consideration transferred in the Merger.
Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total purchase price has been allocated to the acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities of Brooklyn based on their estimated fair values as of March 25, 2021, the Merger closing date. Because the consideration paid by Brooklyn LLC in the Merger is more than the estimated fair values of Brooklyn’s net assets deemed to be acquired, goodwill is equal to the difference of approximately $8,589,000, which has been calculated using the fair values of the net assets of Brooklyn as of March 25, 2021.

The allocation of the estimated purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities deemed to be assumed from Brooklyn, based on their estimated fair values as of March 25, 2021, is as follows:

  
Historical
Balance
Sheet of
Brooklyn at
March 25, 2020
  
Fair Value
Adjustment
to Brooklyn
Pre-Merger
Assets
  
Purchase
Price
Allocation Pro
Forma
Adjustment
 
Cash and cash equivalents $148,000  $0  $148,000 
Accounts receivable  103,000   0   103,000 
Prepaid expense and other current assets  329,000   0   329,000 
Property and equipment, net  1,015,000   0   1,015,000 
Software development costs  1,296,000   (368,000)  928,000 
Customers  0   548,000   548,000 
Trade name  0   299,000   299,000 
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other current liabilities  (3,781,000)  0   (3,781,000)
Net assets acquired, excluding goodwill $(890,000) $479,000  $(411,000)
             
Total consideration $8,178,000         
Net assets acquired, excluding goodwill  (411,000)        
Goodwill $8,589,000         

Brooklyn LLC was obligated under the Merger Agreement to have $10,000,000 in cash and cash equivalents on its balance sheet at the effective time of the Merger. To ensure Brooklyn LLC had the required funds, certain beneficial holders of Brooklyn LLC’s Class A membership interests entered into contractual commitments to invest $10,000,000 into Brooklyn LLC immediately prior to the closing of the Merger. During March 2021, Brooklyn offered its Class A unit holders an additional 5% rights offering for an additional $500,000 to be raised by a rights offering. Brooklyn received funds from the rights offering between February 17, 2021 and April 5, 2021.

Disposition

On March 26, 2021, Brooklyn sold its rights, title and interest in and to an exclusive license agreement by and between Exacis and Factor Limited (the “Purchased License”).  The Company assumed none of Exacis’ liabilities, other than liabilities under the assets relatingPurchased License that accrue subsequent to the business it operated (under the name NTN Buzztime, Inc.) prior to the Merger to eGames.com in exchange for a purchase price of $2,000,000 and assumption of specified liabilities relating to that business. The sale was completed in accordance with the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement. Details of the Disposition are as follows:closing date.

Proceeds from sale:   
Cash $132,000 
Escrow  50,000 
Assume advance/loans  1,700,000 
Interest on advance/loans  68,000 
     
Carrying value of assets sold:    
Cash and cash equivalents  (14,000)
Accounts receivable  (75,000)
Prepaids and other current assets  (124,000)
Property and equipment, net  (1,014,000)
Software development costs  (927,000)
Customers  (548,000)
Trade name  (299,000)
Goodwill  (8,589,000)
Other assets  (103,000)
     
Liabilities transferred upon sale:    
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  113,000 
Obligations under finance leases  17,000 
Lease liability  26,000 
Deferred revenue  55,000 
Other current liabilities  149,000 
     
Transaction costs  (265,000)
     
Total loss on sale of assets $(9,648,000)

Unaudited Pro Forma Disclosure


The following unaudited pro forma financial information summarizes the results of operations for the years months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 as if the Merger and the Disposition had been completed as of January 1, 2020. Pro forma information primarily reflects adjustments relating to the reversal of transaction costs. Assuming that the Merger and the Disposition had been completed as of January 1, 2020, the transaction costs would have been expensed in the prior period.


  Years ended December 31, 
  2021
  2020
 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(122,306,000) $(26,547,000)
         
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders $(2.82) $(1.51)


Acquisition

On July 16, 2021, Brooklyn and Brooklyn Acquisition Sub, Inc. entered into the Acquisition Agreement. The Acquisition closed contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of the Acquisition Agreement. At the closing:

Brooklyn acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of Novellus, Inc. as the result of the merger of Brooklyn Acquisition Sub, Inc. with and into Novellus, Inc., following which, Novellus, Inc., as the surviving corporation, became Brooklyn’s wholly owned subsidiary and Novellus Ltd. became Brooklyn’s indirectly owned subsidiary; and


•     Brooklyn acquired 25.0% of the total outstanding equity interests of NoveCite.

Brooklyn deliveredIn consideration for the Acquisition totaling approximately $124,000,000, which consisted of (a) approximately $22,854,000 in cash, net of cash acquired, and (b) approximately 7,022,000 shares of common stock, which underExacis Assets, on the termsclosing date of the Acquisition Agreement were valued at a total of $102,000,000, based on a price of $14.5253 per share.


The Acquisition Agreement contained customary representations, warranties and certain indemnification provisions. Approximately 741,000 of the shares issued as consideration were placed in escrow for a period of up to 12 months in order to secure indemnification obligations to Brooklyn under the Acquisition Agreement. The Acquisition Agreement also contains certain non-competition and non-solicitation provisions pursuant to which Novellus LLC agreed not to engage in certain competitive activities for a period of five years following the closing, including customary restrictions relating to employees. No employees of Novellus Ltd. or Novellus, Inc. prior to the Acquisition continued their employment, or were otherwise engaged by Brooklyn, following the Acquisition.


In connection with the Acquisition, the co-founders of Novellus, Ltd. entered into lock-up agreements with respect to approximately 3,378,000 of the shares of common stock received in the Acquisition, and Brooklyn’s Chairman of the Board of Directors and its Chief Executive Officer and President entered into identical lock-up agreements with respect to their current holdings of Brooklyn stock. Each lock-up agreement extends for a period of three years, provided that up to 75% of the shares of common stock subject to the lock-up agreement may be released from the lock-up restrictions earlier if the price of common stock on the Nasdaq exceeds specified thresholds. The lock-up agreements include customary exceptions for transfers during the applicable lock-up period.


The Company expects the Acquisition will advance its evolution into a platform company with a pipeline of next generation engineered cellular, gene editing and cytokine programs. In addition, the acquisition of Novellus, Ltd. builds on the License Agreement. (See Note 11). The completion of the acquisition of Novellus, Ltd. relieved Brooklyn LLC from potential obligations to pay Novellus, Ltd. certain upfront fees, clinical development milestone fees and post-registration royalties under the License Agreement. The agreement with Factor Bioscience Limited (“Factor”) under the License Agreement, which grants Brooklyn LLC exclusive rights to develop certain next-generation mRNA gene editing and cell therapy products, remained unchanged.

Although Brooklyn acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of Novellus, Inc.,transaction, the Company accounted for the Acquisition asissued to Exacis an asset acquisition (as the assets acquired did not constitute a business as defined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations), and was measured by the amountaggregate of cash paid and by the fair value of the shares of common stock issued. As a result, substantially all of the value acquired was attributed to IPR&D, with the exception of the cash paid for the investment in NoveCite, which is being accounted for as an investment in equity securities, as discussed further below.

Brooklyn paid $22,854,000 in cash, net of cash acquired, as part of the consideration for the Acquisition, of which $1,000,000 was paid in cash for the investment in NoveCite. Brooklyn also issued approximately 7,022,00069,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, of which approximately 3,644,000 shares are unrestricted and 3,378,000 shares are subject to a 12-month lockup, pursuant to which Exacis may not sell or otherwise transfer such shares.  The shares were issued to Exacis at a price based on the three-year lockup. The unrestrictedCompany having an assumed equity valuation of $75.0 million, divided by the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of the close of business two trading days prior to the closing date.  For accounting purposes, the shares issued were valued at $10.05$3.00 per share, which was the closing price of Brooklyn’sthe Company’s common stock on July 16, 2021.the date of issuance.  The Company additionally agreed to make the following contingent payments:
(i)
if, at any time during the three-year period commencing on the closing date and ending on the three-year anniversary of the closing date, the Company’s market capitalization equals or exceeds $100.0 million for at least ten consecutive trading days, then the Company will issue to Exacis a number of shares of common stock equal to (x) $2.0 million divided by (y) the quotient of $100.00 million divided by the number of the Company’s then issued and outstanding shares of common stock;
(ii)
if, at any time during the three-year period commencing on the closing date and ending on the three-year anniversary of the closing date, the Company’s market capitalization equals or exceeds $200.0 million for at least ten consecutive trading days, then the Company will issue to Exacis a number of additional shares of common stock equal to (x) $2.0 million divided by (y) the quotient of $200.00 million divided by the number of the Company’s then issued and outstanding shares of common stock (collectively with (i) above, the “Market Cap Contingent Consideration”); and
(iii)during the five-year period commencing on the closing date and ending on the five-year anniversary of the closing date, the Company will pay or deliver to Exacis 20% of all cash or other consideration (collectively, “License Contingent Consideration”) actually received by the Company during such five-year period from (i) third-party licensees or sublicensees of the intellectual property rights acquired by the Company from Exacis pursuant to the Exacis Purchase Agreement, or (ii) subject to certain exceptions, the sale of such intellectual property rights; provided, that the License Contingent Consideration shall not in any event exceed $45.0 million.

The Company accounted for the Exacis Acquisition as an asset acquisition because it determined that substantially all of the fair value of the restrictedassets acquired was concentrated in the Purchased License.  Assets acquired in an asset acquisition are recognized based on their cost to the acquirer and generally allocated to the assets on a relative fair value basis.  The Company’s cost for acquiring the Exacis Assets includes the issuance of the shares was discounted by approximately 35%of the Company’s common stock, direct acquisition-related costs and contingent consideration.


The Market Cap Contingent Consideration is indexed to $6.53 per restricted share,or settled in the Company’s own shares.  As a result, the Company classified the Market Cap Contingent Consideration as a liability measured at fair value because the financial instrument embodies a conditional obligation (the Company would only issue the shares on the condition that the market capitalization thresholds are met), and at inception, the monetary value of the obligation is based solely on a fixed monetary amount ($2.0 million of shares for each target), which was derived fromwill be settleable with a variable number of the average discount rate between the Black Scholes and Finnerty valuation models.Company’s shares.  The resultingCompany used a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the fair value of the asset acquired isMarket Cap Contingent Consideration as follows:of the acquisition date using the following assumptions:

  
Fair Value of
Consideration
 
Cash paid $22,882,000 
Cash acquired  (28,000)
Unrestricted shares  36,628,000 
Restricted shares  22,056,000 
Total fair value of consideration paid  81,538,000 
Less amount of cash paid for NoveCite investment  (1,000,000)
Fair value of IPR&D acquired $80,538,000
 

Stock price $3.00 
Risk-free rate  3.58%
Volatility  100%
Dividend yield  0%
Expected term 3.0 years 



The License Contingent Consideration is to be settled in cash and is generally recognized when the liability is probable and estimable.  As of the acquisition date and as of December 31, 2023, the Company concluded that paying the License Contingent Consideration was not probable or estimable.  Therefore, there was no applicable contingent consideration liability recognized.

The table below shows the total fair value of the consideration paid for the Exacis Assets (in thousands).

  Fair Value of
Consideration
 
Shares issued $208 
Contingent consideration  225 
Direct costs  27 
Total fair value $460 



The Company allocated 100% of the fair value of the consideration to the Purchased License, which the Company determined is an IPR&D that isasset.  IPR&D assets acquired through an asset purchase that hashave no alternative future uses and no separate economic values from itstheir original intended purpose isare expensed in the period the cost is incurred.  Accordingly,As a result, the Company expensed the fair value of the IPR&DPurchased License during the third quarteryear ended December 31, 2023.

5)Contract with Customer


On February 21, 2023, the Company and Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (“Lineage”) entered into an exclusive option and license agreement (the “Lineage Agreement”), which provided Lineage with the option (the “Option Right”) to obtain an exclusive sublicense of 2021intellectual property from the Company and to request the Company to develop a customized cell line.  The Lineage Agreement was amended in August 2023 to provide for changes specifically related to the cell line customization activities such as (i) payment terms, (ii) certain definitions, (iii) certain courses of action if the customized cell line selected by Lineage is not successful and (iv) documentation requirements.  Lineage paid the Company a $0.3 million non-refundable up-front payment (the “Option Fee”) for the Option Right and paid an initial payment of $0.4 million to commence the cell line customization activities, per the amended payment terms. If Lineage obtains the sublicense, the Company would be entitled to receive additional license fees, including milestone payments and royalties.


Pursuant to ASC 606, the Company determined that the Option Right was an unexercised right held by Lineage under the Lineage Agreement at contract inception, as the cell line customization activities and the sublicense were optional purchases at contract inception. These optional purchases of goods and services would be treated as separate contracts if and when Lineage determines that it will make such purchases. Therefore, 100% of the Option Fee was allocated to the Option Right.  The Option Fee will remain in deferred revenue until such time that Lineage enters into the sublicense or when the Option Right expires.


The Option Right and the cell line customization activities are accounted for as separate contracts, and the Company has determined that the amended terms discussed above represent a modification to the cell line customization contract.  Because there were no goods or services transferred to Lineage before entering into the amendment, and therefore, no previously recognized revenue, there was no catch-up adjustment to revenue required at the time of the amendment.


Lineage will make payments to the Company for the cell line customization activities over the development period.  The Company will only earn the remaining full amount of the cell line customization fee if it makes certain progress towards delivery of the customized cell line.  The Company has determined that $0.4 million of consideration received could be recognized without the probability of being reversed, and it has placed a constraint on the remaining contractual customization fee.  The $0.4 million is being recognized equally over the development period, which is expected to be approximately 20 to 25 months, as the level of effort to perform the services is happening at the same rate over time.  If the development period is expected to be longer or shorter than originally planned, the Company will recognize a cumulative catch-up adjustment in the amountperiod that such determination is made. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recognized approximately $0.1 million of $80,538,000.revenue for the customization activities.


Investmentthe license that the Company may provide to Lineage if Lineage exercises the Option Right is not considered a performance obligation at this time, as it is an optional request that the customer may make in NoveCitethe future and will be accounted for as a separate contract when the customer exercises the Option Right.

As a result of the Acquisition, Brooklyn acquired

The Company recognizes direct labor and currently owns 25% of NoveCite and Citius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Citius”) owns the remaining 75%. A member of the Company’s management holds one of 3 board seats on NoveCite’s board of directors. Citius’ s officers and directors hold the other two board seats. Citius also retains the ability, in its sole discretion, to increase the size of the board of directors of NoveCite. Pursuant to a subscription agreement, as amended, between NoveCite and Novellus, LLC (the former parent of Novellus, Inc.), which was further amended and assigned to Brooklyn by Novellus, LLC upon the completion of the Acquisition, Citius has complete operational control and financial responsibility for NoveCite. Citrus’s officers are also the officers of NoveCite and oversee the business strategy and operations of NoveCite. Therefore, despite Brooklyn’s ownership of greater than 20% of NoveCite, which leads to a presumption thatsupplies used in the absencecustomization activities as incurred and are recorded as a cost of predominant evidence to the contrary, an investor has the ability to exercise significant influence over an investee, Brooklyn does not exercise any significant influence over NoveCite or its board of directors. Brooklyn also has no contractual rightsrevenue.  As provided for in the profits or obligations to shareA&R Factor License Agreement discussed in the losses of NoveCite.  Accordingly,Note 11, the Company is accounting for its interest in NoveCite under ASC Topic 321, Investments – Equity Securities. Because NoveCite’s stock is not publicly traded and, therefore, does not have a readily determinable fair value,obligated to pay Factor Limited 20% of any amounts the Company has electedreceives from a customer that is related to account for its investment atthe licensed technology under the A&R Factor License Agreement, which is also recorded as a cost which was $1,000,000. The Company will make adjustments to this amount when there are observable transactions for the identical or similar equity securities of the same issuer that would provide an indicator of fair value. In addition, if qualitative factors indicate a potential impairment, fair value must be estimated and the investment written down to that fair value if it is lower than the carrying value. As of December 31, 2021, there were no observable transactions for identical or similar equity securities of NoveCite to provide an indication of fair value, nor were there any indications of impairment of the investment.revenue.

5)6)Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsPromissory Note and Convertible Note Financings

Fair value is defined as

On July 14, 2023, the price that would beCompany received $8.7 million from a private placement in which the Company issued $8.7 million in aggregate principal amount of convertible notes (the “July 2023 convertible notes”) and warrants to sellpurchase an asset, or paidaggregate of approximately 6.1 million shares of its common stock (the “July 2023 warrants”). The Company recognized approximately $0.2 million in fees associated with the transaction.


On December 8, 2023, the Company received $1.5 million in exchange for the issuance of 6% promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of $1.5 million to transferCharles Cherington. The promissory note was to mature on January 8, 2024, and interest accrued at a liability, inrate of 6.0% per annum, payable at maturity. On December 14, 2023, the Company repaid the $1.5 million of principal and $1,500 of accrued interest due under the promissory note. There are no further obligations under the promissory note.


On December 14, 2023, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with certain purchasers for the private placement of $9.2 million of convertible notes (the “December 2023 convertible notes” and together with the July 2023 convertible notes, the “convertible notes”) and warrants to purchase an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value hierarchy has been established for valuation inputs that givesaggregate of approximately 9.6 million shares of the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilitiesCompany’s common stock (the “December 2023 warrants” and together with the July 2023 warrants, the “note warrants”). There were two closings under this purchase agreement. The first closing occurred on December 15, 2023, and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

•         Level 1 Inputs – Valued based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

•         Level 2 Inputs – Valued based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.

•          Level 3 Inputs – Valued based on inputs for which there is little or no market value, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The following tables summarize the liabilities that are measured at fair value asCompany received $7.8 million and issued $7.8 million of December 31, 20212023 convertible notes and 2020:December 2023 warrants to purchase approximately 8.1 million shares of our common stock. The second closing, in which the Company received the reaming $1.4 million under the purchase agreement, occurred in January 2024. See Note 18 for additional information regarding the second closing.


See Note 16 for more information on the note warrants.

  As of December 31, 2021 
Description Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Liabilities:         
Contingent consideration  0   0  $19,930,000 
Total $0  $0  $19,930,000 

  As of December 31, 2020 
Description Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Liabilities:         
Contingent consideration  0   0  $20,110,000 
Total $0  $0  $20,110,000 
The July 2023 convertible notes bear interest at 6% per annum, and the December 2023 convertible notes bear interest at 12% per annum, both of which are payable quarterly in arrears. At the Company’s election, it may pay interest either in cash or in-kind by increasing the outstanding principal amount of the convertible notes. The July 2023 convertible notes mature on July 14, 2028, and the December 2023 convertible notes issued on December 15, 2023 mature on December 15, 2028, unless earlier converted or repurchased.  The Company does not have the option to redeem any of the convertible notes prior to maturity.


F-16

At the option of the holders, the convertible notes may be converted from time-to-time in whole or in part into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion rate of, with respect to the July 2023 convertible notes, $2.86 per share and, with respect to the December 2023 convertible notes, $1.9194 per share, subject to customary adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalization and the like.  As of December 31, 2023, none of the convertible notes were converted into shares of common stock.





The contingent considerationconvertible notes provide for customary events of default which include (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), among others: nonpayment of principal or interest, breach of covenants or other agreements in the convertible notes; the occurrence of a material adverse effect event (as defined in the related securities purchase agreement) and certain events of bankruptcy. Generally, if an event of default occurs and is relatedcontinuing under the convertible notes, the holder thereof may require the Company to an asset purchase agreement entered into between Brooklyn LLCrepurchase some or all of their convertible notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the convertible notes being repurchased, plus accrued and IRX Therapeutics (“IRX”) in unpaid interest thereon.


In connection with the IRX Acquisition, according to which, Brooklyn LLC is obligated to pay royalties to certain noteholders and shareholdersissuance of IRX based on future revenues from any future IRX-2 product sales.

Contingent consideration for the IRX Acquisition was initially valued at the transaction price and is subsequently valued at the end of each reporting period using third-party valuation services or other market observable data. The third-party valuation services use industry standard valuation models, including discounted cash flow analysis, to determine the value. After completing its validation procedures as of December 31, 2021,2023 convertible notes, the Company adjustedagreed to reduce the carrying amountexercise price of its contingent consideration liabilitiesthe warrants the Company issued in a private placement in December 2022 (see Note 16) to purchase an aggregate of approximately 4.4 million shares of the Company’s common stock from $3.28 to $1.43 per share and of the July 2023 warrants from $2.61 to $1.43 per share. The effect of the reduction of the exercise price of these warrants was approximately $1.6 million and measured as follows:

  
Year ended
December 31, 2021
 
Balance as of beginning of period $20,110,000 
Fair value adjustments included in operating expenses  (180,000)
Balance as of end of period $19,930,000 

Contingent consideration is measured at fair value and is based on significant inputs not observable in the market, which represents a Level 3 measurement withinexcess of the fair value hierarchy.of the modified instruments over the fair value of the instruments immediately before they were modified. The valuation of contingent consideration uses assumptions the Company believes would be made by a market participant. The Company assesses these estimates on an on-going basis as additional data impacting the assumptions is obtained. Future changeschange in the fair value of contingent consideration relatedthe repriced warrants is considered an issuance cost to updated assumptionsthe December 2023 convertible notes and estimates are recognizedDecember 2023 warrants. As such, the $1.6 million was allocated to each of those respective instruments based on their relative fair values, or approximately $0.8 million to each of the December 2023 convertible notes and December 2023 warrants.


The Company determined that there were no embedded derivatives within the statementsconvertible notes that required bifurcation from the host agreement.  The Company allocated the gross proceeds received, the fees incurred, and as applicable, the impact of operations.repricing the warrants discussed above, over the July 2023 convertible notes and July 2023 warrants and over the December 2023 convertible notes and December 2023 warrants, as applicable, based on their relative fair values as follows (in thousands):
        Allocation of Proceeds and Costs:  Allocation of 
  Relative
Fair Value
  Allocation
Percentage
  Proceeds  Costs  Proceeds,
Net
 
July 2023 convertible notes $8,715   39.94% $3,481  $(80) $3,401 
July 2023 warrants  13,103   60.06%  5,234   (121)  5,113 
  $21,818   100.00% $8,715  $(201) $8,514 

        Allocation of Proceeds and Costs:  Allocation of 
  Relative
Fair Value
  Allocation
Percentage
  Proceeds  Costs  Warrant
Repricing
  Proceeds,
Net
 
December 2023 convertible notes $9,059   48.83% $3,803  $(81) $(766) $2,956 
December 2023 warrants  9,495   51.17%  3,985   (85)  (802)  3,098 
  $18,554   100.00% $7,788  $(166) $(1,568) $6,054 


The Company estimated the fair values of the convertible notes as of July 14, 2023 and December 15, 2023 based off a valuation performed by a third-party specialist using a binomial tree model and the following assumptions:

Contingent consideration may change significantly as development progresses and additional data are obtained, impacting the Company’s assumptions regarding probabilities of successful achievement of related milestones used to estimate the
 
 Stock
Price
  Credit
Spread
  Volatility  Risk-Free
Rate
 
July 2023 convertible notes
 
$
2.81
   
2,500
   
108
%
  
4.60
%
December 2023 convertible notes
 
$
1.51
   
2,000
   
109
%
  
3.90
%

The fair value of the liabilitynote warrants, all of which qualified for equity classification, was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model as of each of July 14, 2023 and December 15, 2023 using the timingfollowing assumptions:

 
 Stock
Price
  Exercise
Price
 Expected
Life
 Volatility  Dividend  Risk-Free
Rate
 
July 2023 warrants
 
$
2.81
  
$
2.61
 5 years  
98
%
  
0.00
%
  
4.04
%
December 2023 warrants
 
$
1.51
  
$
1.43
 5 years  
101
%
  
0.00
%
  
3.91
%
The amount of proceeds allocated to the note warrants resulted in whicha corresponding reduction in the milestones are expected to be achieved. In evaluating the faircarrying value information, considerable judgment is required to interpret the market data used to develop the estimates. The estimates of fair value may not be indicative of the amounts that could be realized inrespective convertible notes as a current market exchange.  Accordingly,debt discount, which is amortized with the usedebt issuance costs as a component of different market assumptions and/or different valuation techniques could result in materially different fair value estimates.interest expense based on the effective interest rate method over the contractual terms of the convertible notes.


The following table shows the activity that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2023 for the convertible notes on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet:
For purposes
Gross convertible notes at issuance $16,503 
Debt discount and debt issuance costs  (10,146)
Amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs
  303 
Paid-in-kind interest added to principal  113 
Convertible notes, net, at December 31, 2023 $6,773 


The future minimum principal payments under the convertible notes as of this calculation, a royalty equal to 13% of revenue (consistingDecember 31, 2023 are as follows:
Years ending December 31, 
Principal
Payments
 
2024 $- 
2025  - 
2026  - 
2027  - 
2028  16,616 
Total $16,616 

The Company has recognized approximately $0.6 million in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 for the convertible notes, which includes $0.3 million for the amortization of the royalty due to University of South Floridadebt discount and debt issuance costs.  Of the royalty dueremaining $0.3 million in interest expense, $0.1 million was paid in-kind and added to the collaborator)principal of the respective notes and $0.2 million of interest is assumed until 2029 and a royalty of 7% of revenues is assumed from 2030 to 2038. The post patent decline is 50%in accrued expenses in the first year and 10% thereafter. Income taxes were projected to be 26% of net royalty savings. The cash flows were discounted by the liability specific weighted average cost of capital of 26% using the mid-point convention.accompanying consolidated balance sheet.


6)7)Property and Equipment


Property and equipment consist of the following:following (in thousands):

  As of December 31,
 
  2023  2022 
         
Laboratory and manufacturing equipment $40  $28 
Furniture and fixtures
  19   - 
Leasehold improvements
  274   - 
Computer equipment and programs
  274   240 
   607   268 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  (114)  (32)
Property and equipment, net $493  $236 


During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recognized a F-17de minimis loss on disposal of fixed assets. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company consolidated its research and development activities in Cambridge, Massachusetts and entered into lease termination agreements for its Brooklyn, New York and San Diego, California facilities. As a result, the Company disposed of certain assets it would no longer use and recognized a loss on disposal of fixed assets of approximately $0.3 million, which was composed of $0.6 million in remaining net book value of such assets, offset by proceeds received from selling certain fixed assets for approximately $0.3 million.

  December 31,
 
  2021  2020 
Laboratory and manufacturing equipment $258,000  $300,000 
Leasehold improvements
  464,000   414,000 
Computer equipment  154,000   0 
   877,000   714,000 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization  (207,000)  (120,000)
Property and equipment, net $670,000  $594,000 

Depreciation expense totaled $117,000$0.1 million and $98,000$0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 20212023 and 2020,2022, respectively. No depreciation expense is recorded on fixed assets in process until such time as the assets are completed and are placed into service.

7)8)Leases

Operating Leases

The
The Company currently has operating leases for office and laboratory space in (a) the boroughsborough of Brooklyn and Manhattan in New York, New York, (b) Cambridge, Massachusetts, and (c) Somerville, Massachusetts, which expire in 20252026, 2028, and 2026, respectively.2033, respectively.


Until March 2022, the Company also leased a facility in Brooklyn, New York. In June 2021,March 2022, the Company entered into an additional lease agreement to assign that lease to an unaffiliated third party, who also agreed to purchase certain equipment from the Company for $50,000, which partially reimbursed the Company for certain existing unamortized leasehold improvements, and to reimburse the Company for the approximately 2,700 square feet$63,000 security deposit under the lease. Under the assignment agreement, the unaffiliated third party assumed all of officethe obligations, liabilities, covenants and laboratory spaceconditions of the Company as tenant under the lease.  As a result of the lease assignment, the Company wrote off the remaining ROU asset balance of approximately $1.4 million and the corresponding lease liability of approximately $1.5 million.



The Company had also leased a facility in San Diego, California. During the second quarter of 2022, the Company determined to consolidate its research and development efforts in Cambridge, Massachusetts and sublease its San Diego lab and office space.  As a result, the Company recognized an impairment charge of approximately $0.8 million on the San Diego lease ROU asset during the year ended December 31, 2022.  In November 2022, the Company entered into a lease termination agreement, effective January 31, 2023; and as of December 31, 2023, there was no lease liability or ROU asset balances remaining for the San Diego lease.



In October 2022, the Company entered into a sublease with a subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, as sublessor (“Sublessor”), for office, laboratory and research and development space of approximately $56.0045,500 square feet in Somerville, Massachusetts.  The lease expires in November 2033 and is subject to a five-year extension. Rent payments under the sublease began on November 29, 2023. The Company pays base rent of approximately $0.5 million per month during the first year of the term, which will increase 3% per year thereafter.  The Company also makes monthly payments for parking, which are based on market rates that can change from time to time, and pay its share of traditional lease expenses, including certain taxes, operating expenses and utilities.



The Company paid the Sublessor a security deposit in the form of a letter of credit in the amount of approximately $4.1 million. Provided there are no events of default by the Company under the sublease, the letter of credit will be reduced on an incremental basis throughout the term.



The Sublessor agreed to provide the Company with a tenant improvement allowance (“TIA”) of $190 per rentable square foot, annually. or $8.6 million.  Tenant improvements in excess of this amount will be at the Company’s own cost.  Construction was substantially complete in January 2024 and the total out-of-pocket costs for the improvements is estimated to be approximately $2.1 million.  As of December 31, 2023, the Company received the entire $8.6 million TIA.



The lease provides for annual escalationCompany obtained access and control of the base rent basedpremises on June 21, 2023, and as such, the Company determined that the commencement date for accounting purposes was June 21, 2023.  The Company also performed an analysis on the year-over-year increaseaccounting ownership of the consumer price index,tenant improvement assets and determined that such assets were sublessor/lessor owned.  As a result, TIA payments made by the Sublessor to the Company for the tenant improvement assets are considered a reimbursement rather than a lease incentive and not included as part of the consideration of the contract.  Amounts paid by the Company for sublessor/lessor owned assets in excess of the TIA are considered non-cash lease payments and are added to the consideration in the contract.



The Company measured the lease liability and corresponding ROU asset for the sublease as of June 21, 2023, which includes lease payments the Company must make over the ten-year lease term.  The Company did not include the option to extend the lease for an additional five years in the initial measurement because the Company was not reasonably certain as of June 21, 2023 that it would exercise its right to extend the lease term. As a result, the Company recorded a lease liability of $34.4 million, which included $0.6 million for the incremental amount above the TIA that the Company expected to pay for sublessor/lessor owned assets as of the initial measurement date, and a corresponding ROU asset of $34.7 million as of June 30, 2023.



In December 2023, the Company incurred additional out-of-pocket expenses of approximately $0.4 million for sublessor/lessor owned assets as a result of out-of-scope changes.  These cost changes were accounted for as a lease modification of the existing lease.  The Company determined that the lease continued to be classified as an operating lease after modification and remeasured the liability for the remaining unpaid lease payments, including the aggregate $1.0 million of unpaid out-of-pocket costs above the TIA that the Company will pay for sublessor/lessor owned assets, as well as theremeasuring any variable lease payment of other customary expenses, such as common area maintenance fees, property taxes, and insurance. Upon entering into this lease agreement, the Company paid a lease deposit of approximately $25,000. The Cambridge, Massachusetts lease expires in June 2028. See Note 17 for subsequent event information regarding the Company’s leases.

The Company adopted ASC Topic 842, Leases, on December 31, 2020 using the modified transition method without retrospective application to comparative periods. The Company elected the package of three practical expedients allowed for under the transition guidance. Accordingly, the Company did not reassess: (1) whether any expired or existing contracts are/or contain leases; (2) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; or (3) initial direct costs for any existing leases. The Company has also elected not to recognize right-of-use assets (“ROU assets”) and lease liabilities for short-term leases that have a term of 12 months or less.

Operating lease liabilities represent the present value of lease payments not yet paid. ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset and are based upon the operating lease liabilities adjusted for prepaid or accrued lease payments, initial direct costs, lease incentives and impairment of operating lease assets. As the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable, the Company used its incremental borrowing rates based on the information available at the lease commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. To determine the present value of lease payments not yet paid, the Company estimates secured borrowing rates corresponding to the maturities of the leases.

The Company has elected the practical expedient to not separate non-lease components from the lease components to which they relate and instead account for each as a single lease component for all underlying asset classes. Some leasing arrangements require variable payments that are dependent on usage or may vary for other reasons, such as payments for insurance, tax payments and other miscellaneous costs. The variable portion of lease payments is not included in the ROU assets or lease liabilities. Rather, variable payments, other than those dependent upon an index or rate.  The Company also requested a third-party specialist to reassess the incremental borrowing rate, are expensed whenwhich is the obligation for thoserate of interest that a lessee would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term an amount equal to the lease payments is incurred and are included in a similar economic environment.  This reassessment resulted in an increased incremental borrowing rate from 12.7% as of the initial measurement date to 14.4% as of the modification date.  The remeasurement resulted in a decrease to the lease expenses. Accordingly, all expenses associatedliability of approximately $1.6 million with a lease contract are accounted for as lease expenses.corresponding adjustment to the ROU asset.


Operating leases are included in right of use assets - operating leases and operating lease liabilities, current and long-term, on the balance sheet. Lease expense for operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in general and administrative costs in the statements of operations.

The Company recognizes operating lease expense and lease payments from the sublease on a straight-line basis in its statements of operations over the lease terms. DuringFor the years ended December 31, 20212023 and 2020,2022, the net operating lease expenses were as follows:follows (in thousands):

  Years ended December 31, 
  2023  2022 
Operating lease expense $3,399  $595 
Sublease income  (84)  (84)
Variable lease expense  136   150 
Total lease expense $3,451  $661 

  Years ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Operating lease expense $688,000  $591,000 
Sublease income  (84,000)  (77,000)
Variable lease expense  19,000   21,000 
Total lease expense $623,000  $535,000 

The tables below show the beginning balances of the operating ROU assets and lease liabilities as of January 1, 20212023 and the ending balances as of December 31 2021,2023, including the changes during the period.period (in thousands).

  
Operating Lease
ROU Assets
 
    
Operating lease ROU assets at January 1, 2023 $1,030 
Recognition of ROU asset for Somerville Sublease
  34,410 
Adjustment to ROU asset for remeasurement of Somvervile Sublease liability
  (1,620)
Amortization of operating lease ROU assets
  (1,039)
Operating lease ROU assets at December 31, 2023 $32,781 

  
Operating Lease
Liabilities
 
Operating lease liabilities at January 1, 2023 $1,182 
Recognition of lease liability for Somerville Sublease
  34,169 
Accretion of interest for Somerville Sublease
  1,858 
Adjustment to lease liablity due to remeasurement of Somerville Sublease
  (1,620)
Principal payments on operating lease liabilities
  (519)
Operating lease liabilities at December 31, 2023  35,070 
Less non-current portion  32,854 
Current portion at December 31, 2023 $2,216 

  
Operating Lease
ROU Assets
 
    
Operating lease ROU assets at January 1, 2021 $2,093,000 
Amortization of operating lease ROU assets  (342,000)
Addition of operating lease ROU assets  816,000 
Operating lease ROU assets at December 31, 2021 $2,567,000 

  
Operating Lease
Liabilities
 
Operating lease liabilities at January 1, 2021 $2,178,000 
Principal payments on operating lease liabilities  (321,000)
Addition of operating lease liabilities  866,000 
Operating lease liabilities at December 31, 2021  2,723,000 
Less non-current portion  2,297,000 
Current portion at December 31, 2021 $426,000 

As of December 31, 2021,2023, the Company’s operating leases had a weighted-average remaining life of 4.99.8 years with a weighted-average discount rate of 12.76%14.24%. The maturities of the operating lease liabilities are as follows:follows (in thousands):

 
As of
December 31
  
As of
December 31,
2023
 
2022 $750,000 
2023  767,000 
2024  785,000  $6,972 
2025  802,000   6,075 
2026  267,000   6,238 
2027  6,308 
2028  6,406 
Thereafter  246,000   33,879 
Total payments  3,617,000   65,878 
Less imputed interest  (894,000)  (30,808)
Total operating lease liabilities $2,723,000  $35,070 

Manhattan Sublease
Sublease Agreement


OnIn April 18, 2019, the Company entered into a sublease agreement with Nezu Asia Capital Management, LLCan unaffiliated third party (the “Tenant”“Subtenant”), whereby the TenantSubtenant agreed to sublease approximately 999 square feet of space currently rented by the Company in the borough of Manhattan in New York, New York commencing on May 15, 2019. The term of this sublease expires on October 31, 2026 with no option to extend the sublease term.extend. Rent payments provided by the TenantSubtenant under the sublease agreement began on September 1, 2019. The sublease agreement stipulates an annual rent increase of 2.25%. The TenantSubtenant is also responsible for paying to the Company all tenant energy costs, annual operating costs, and annual tax costs attributable to the subleased space during the term of the sublease.
  
As of
December 31,
2021
 
2022 $82,000 
2023  84,000 
2024  86,000 
2025  88,000 
2026  75,000 
  $415,000 

The Company received sublease payments of approximately $83,000 and $79,000 during$0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 20212023 and 2020,2022, respectively. In accordance with ASC Topic 842, the Company treats the sublease as a separate lease, as the Company was not relieved of the primary obligation under the originalrelated lease. The Company continues to account for the Manhattanrelated lease as a lessee and in the same manner as prior to the commencement date of the sublease. The Company accounts for the sublease as a lessor of the lease. The sublease is classified as an operating lease, as it does not meet the criteria of a sale-type or direct financing lease.

The following tables shows the future payments the Company expects to receive from the Subtenant over the remaining term of the sublease (in thousands):

  
As of
December 31,
2023
 
2024 $86 
2025  88
 
2026  75
 
Total payments
 $249 

8)9)Fair Value of Financial Instruments


The following tables summarize the liabilities that are measured at fair value as of December 31, 2023 and, 2022 (in thousands):


     As of December 31, 
Description Level  2023
  2022
 
Liabilities:         
Warrant liabilities - Common Warrants  3  $116  $331 
Market Cap Contingent Consideration  3  $107  $- 


The Company uses a Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of its warrant liabilities and a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the fair value of the Market Cap Contingent Consideration, both of which are considered a Level 3 fair value measurement. The Company remeasures the fair value of the warrant liabilities and the Market Cap Contingent Consideration at each reporting period and changes in the fair values are recognized in the statement of operations.


Certain inputs used in Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo models may fluctuate in future periods based upon factors that are outside of the Company’s control.  A significant change in one or more of these inputs used in the calculation of the fair value may cause a significant change to the fair value of the Company’s warrant liabilities or contingent consideration liabilities, which could also result in material non-cash gains or losses being reported in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.


The following table presents the changes in the liabilities measured at fair value from January 1, 2023, or from the initial measurement date if later than January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023 (in thousands):
  Warrant
Liabilities
  Contingent
Consideration
 
       
Fair value at January 1, 2023
 $331  $- 
Initial measurement  -   225 
Change in fair value  (215)  (118)
Fair value at December 31, 2023
 $116  $107 


The Black-Scholes valuation assumptions used at December 31, 2023 for the warrant liabilities were 3.69 years expected term, 3.93% risk-free rate, 103% volatility and 0% dividend yield.

With the assistance of a third-party specialist, the Company assesses the fair value of the Market Cap Contingent Consideration at each quarterly reporting period using the Monte Carlo model, and as of June 30, 2023, determined that the fair value of the contingent consideration had been reduced by approximately $0.1 million from the initial measurement.  The Company assessed the fair value of the Market Cap Contingent Consideration as of September 30, 2023 and as of December 31, 2023, and determined that there was no material change to the Market Cap Contingent Consideration for either period, and therefore, did not recognize a change in the fair value of the Market Cap Contingent Consideration since the June 30, 2023 remeasurement. The Company assessed the fair value as of December 31, 2023, and the inputs used for that assessment was risk-free rate of 4.07%, expected term of 2.3 years, stock price of $1.80, volatility of 108% and dividend yield of 0%.



The table below is provided for comparative purposes only and presents information about the fair value of the convertible notes relative to the carrying values recognized in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2023 (in thousands).  The Company did not have any of the convertible notes or similar instruments outstanding as of December 31, 2022.
     
December 31,
2023
 
  Level  Carrying
Value
  Fair
Value
 
Convertible Notes  3  $16,616
  $17,594
 


The carrying value in the table above is shown before the allocation of the proceeds to the note warrants. The Company assesses the fair value of the convertible notes using the binomial model, which is considered a Level 3 measurement.  The weighted average inputs used in the binomial model as of December 31, 2023 was stock price of $1.80, credit spread of 1,891, volatility of 109% and risk-free rate of 3.87%.

10)Goodwill and In-Process Research & Development

Goodwill


In November 2018, the Company acquired IRX, which was accounted for as a business combination.  The Company recorded goodwill in the amount of $2.0 million related to the acquisition. The Company performed its annual qualitative assessment as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and based on the assessments, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the entity exceeded its carrying value for such years and that the performance of the quantitative impairment test was not required.  Therefore, no impairment was required for any of the periods presented.


In-Process Research & Development



In 2018, Company recorded IPR&D in the amount of $2,044,000 and $6,860,000, respectively,$6.0 million, which represented the fair value assigned to technologies that were acquired in connection with the acquisition of IRX Acquisitionin November 2018 and which had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use.



In June 2022, the Company received results from the INSPIRE phase 2 trial of IRX-2, a multi-cytokine biologic immunotherapy, in patients with newly diagnosed stage II, III or IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. The IRX-2 multi-cytokine biologic immunotherapy represents substantially all the fair value assigned to the technologies of IRX that the Company acquired. Despite outcomes that favored IRX-2 in certain predefined subgroups, the INSPIRE trial did not meet its primary endpoint of event-free survival. Significant additional clinical development work would be required to advance IRX-2 in the year endedform of additional Phase 2 and 3 studies to further evaluate the treatment effect of IRX-2 in patient subgroups and in combination with checkpoint inhibitor therapies.  The INSPIRE trial was the only Company-sponsored study of IRX-2.  Based on the totality of available information, the Company decided not to further develop IRX-2. As such, the Company determined that the carrying value of the IPR&D asset was impaired and recognized a non-cash impairment charge of approximately $6.0 million on the consolidated statement of operations during 2022, which reduced the value of the asset to zero.
11)
Related Party Transactions


Agreements with Factor Bioscience Inc. and Affiliates



As of December 31, 2018. IPR&D assets are considered2023, the Company had the agreements described below with Factor Bioscience Inc. and/or Dr. Matthew Angel. These agreements have been deemed related party transactions because the Company’s former chief executive officer, Dr. Angel, is the chairman and chief executive officer of Factor Bioscience Inc. and a director of its subsidiary, Factor Bioscience Limited (“Factor Limited” and together with Factor Bioscience Inc. and its other affiliates, “Factor Bioscience”). Dr. Angel resigned as the Company’s chief executive officer effective December 31, 2023.



In September 2022, the Company entered into a Master Services Agreement (the “MSA”) with Factor Bioscience, pursuant to be indefinite lived untilwhich Factor Bioscience agreed to provide services to the completionCompany as agreed between the Company and Factor Bioscience and as set forth in one or abandonmentmore work orders under the MSA, including the first work order included in the MSA (“WO1”). The MSA contains customary confidentiality provisions and representations and warranties of the associatedparties, and the MSA may be terminated by either party upon 30 days’ prior notice, subject to any superseding termination provisions contained in a particular work order.



Under WO1, Factor Bioscience agreed to provide the Company with mRNA cell engineering research support services, including access to certain facilities, equipment, materials and development projects.training, and the Company agreed to pay Factor Bioscience an initial fee of $5.0 million, payable in 12 equal monthly installments of approximately $0.4 million. Of the $5.0 million, the Company allocated $3.5 million to the License Fee Obligation (as defined below). Following the initial 12-month period, the Company agreed to continue paying Factor Bioscience the monthly fee of $0.4 million until such time as WO1 is terminated. Upon entering into the MSA, the Company paid a deposit of $0.4 million, which will be applied to the last month of WO1. The Company may terminate WO1 on or after the second anniversary of the date of the MSA, subject to providing Factor Bioscience with 120 days’ prior notice.  Factor Bioscience may terminate WO1 only on and after the fourth anniversary of the date of the MSA, subject to providing the Company with 120 days’ prior notice.



In connection with entering into the Acquisition,MSA, Factor Limited entered into a waiver agreement with Eterna LLC, pursuant to which Factor Limited agreed to waive payment of $3.5 million otherwise payable to it (the “License Fee Obligation”) in October 2022 by Eterna LLC under the exclusive license agreement entered into in April 2021 by and among Eterna LLC, Novellus Limited and Factor Limited (the “Original Factor License Agreement”).  Under the terms of the waiver agreement, the License Fee Obligation is waived conditionally on the Company expensedpaying Factor Bioscience a minimum of $3.5 million due under the fair valueMSA.


Because the License Fee Obligation was conditionally waived until the Company paid Factor Bioscience a minimum of $3.5 million under the MSA, the Company recorded a liability of $3.5 million.  As of December 31, 2023, there was approximately $1.2 million of the IPR&D it acquiredunamortized License Fee Obligation remaining, which is recorded on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet in the amount“due to related party, current” line item.



In September 2022, Novellus Inc. (“Novellus”) and the Company entered into a Second Amendment to the Limited Waiver and Assignment Agreement (the “Waiver and Assignment Agreement”) with Drs. Matthew Angel and Christopher Rohde (the “Founders”) whereby the Company agreed to be responsible for all future, reasonable and substantiated legal fees, costs, settlements and judgments incurred by the Founders, the Company or Novellus. for certain claims and actions and any pending or future litigation brought against the Founders, Novellus and/or the Company by or on behalf of $80,538,000,the Westman and Sowyrda legal matters described in Note 13 (the “Covered Claims”).  The Founders will continue to be solely responsible for any payments made to satisfy a judgement or settlement of any pending or future wage act claims.  Under the Waiver and Assignment Agreement, the Founders agreed that they are not entitled to, and waived any right to, indemnification or advancement of past, present or future legal fees, costs, judgments, settlement or other liabilities they may have been entitled to receive from the Company or Novellus in respect of the Covered Claims. The Company and the Founders will share in any recoveries up to the point at which the parties have been fully compensated for legal fees, costs and expenses incurred, with the Company retaining any excess recoveries. The Company has the sole authority to direct and control the prosecution, defense and settlement of the Covered Claims.



In November 2022, following the expiration of one of the milestone deadlines for certain regulatory filings required under the Third Amended and Restated Exclusive License Agreement between Novellus Limited and Factor Limited entered into in November 2020 (the “Novellus-Factor License Agreement”), which permitted Factor Limited to terminate the license granted to Novellus Limited thereunder, the Company entered into the first amendment to the Original Factor License Agreement (as amended, the “2021 Factor License Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other things, Factor Limited granted to Eterna LLC an exclusive, sublicensable license under certain patents owned by Factor Limited (the “Factor Patents”) for the purpose of identifying and pursuing certain opportunities to grant to third parties sublicenses to the Factor Patents. The Original Factor License Agreement also (i) terminated the Novellus-Factor License Agreement, (ii) confirmed Factor Limited’s grant to Eterna LLC of the rights and licenses Novellus Limited previously granted to Eterna LLC under the Novellus-Factor License Agreement on the same terms and conditions as granted by Novellus Limited to Eterna LLC under such agreement, (iii) confirmed that the sublicense granted by Novellus Limited in accordance with the Novellus-Factor License Agreement to NoveCite, Inc., a company which the Company has a 25% non-controlling interest (“NoveCite”), survived termination of the Novellus-Factor License Agreement; and (iv) removed Novellus Limited from the Original Factor License Agreement and the license agreement entered into on October 6, 2020 between Novellus Limited and NoveCite, Inc, as amended, and replaced Novellus Limited with Factor Limited as the direct licensor to Eterna LLC and NoveCite under such agreements, respectively.



On February 20, 2023, the Company, determined there were no future alternativeentered into an exclusive license agreement (the “Feb 2023 Factor Exclusive License Agreement”) with Factor Limited, pursuant to which Factor Limited granted to the Company an exclusive, sublicensable, worldwide license under certain patents owned by Factor Limited for the purpose of, among other things, identifying and pursuing certain opportunities to develop products in respect of such patents and to otherwise grant to third parties sublicenses to such patents. The Feb 2023 Factor Exclusive License Agreement, which terminated and superseded the Amended Factor License Agreement, was subsequently terminated and superseded by the A&R Factor License Agreement (as defined below).



On November 14, 2023, the Company entered into an amended and restated exclusive license agreement (the “A&R Factor License Agreement”) with Factor Limited to replace in its entirety the exclusive license agreement between the parties dated February 20, 2023 and the amendment thereto.  Under the terms of the A&R Factor License Agreement, Factor Limited granted to the Company an exclusive, sublicensable license under certain patents owned by Factor Limited (the “Factor Patents”).  The A&R Factor License Agreement also provides for, among other things, the expansion of the Company’s license rights to include (i) the field of use of the Factor Patents to include veterinary uses (ii) know-how that is necessary or separate economic valuesreasonably useful to practice to the licensed patents, (iii) the ability to sublicense through multiple tiers (as opposed to only permitting a direct sublicense) and (iv) the transfer of technology to the Company, subject to the use restrictions in the A&R Factor License Agreement.  The term of the A&R Factor License Agreement expires on November 22, 2027, but will be automatically extended for an additional five years (such period, the “Renewal Term”) if the Company pays at least $6.0 million to Factor Limited from its original intended purpose. (Seefees from sublicenses to the Factor Patents (“Sublicense Fees”), other cash on hand or a combination of both sources of funds.  The Company will pay to Factor Limited 20% of any Sublicense Fee received by the Company during the term of the A&R Factor License Agreement.  Beginning in September 2024, the Company will also begin paying Factor Limited a monthly maintenance fee of approximately $0.4 million until the expiration of the A&R Factor License Agreement, including any Renewal Term. The Company may terminate the A&R Factor License Agreement upon 120 days’ written notice to Factor Limited, and both parties have additional customary termination rights.  Under the A&R Factor License Agreement, the Company is obligated to pay the expenses incurred by Factor Limited in preparing, filing, prosecuting and maintaining the Factor Patents and the Company agreed to bear all costs and expenses associated with enforcing and defending the Factor Patents in any action or proceeding arising from pursuit of sublicensing opportunities under the license granted under the A&R Factor License Agreement.


Exacis Asset Acquisition



On April 26, 2023, the Company entered into the Exacis Purchase Agreement to acquire the Exacis Assets, including all of Exacis’ right, title and interest in the Purchased License. The Company assumed none of Exacis’ liabilities, other than liabilities under the Purchased License that accrue subsequent to the closing date. See Note 4.)



The Exacis Acquisition was deemed a related party transaction because Dr. Gregory Fiore, who was the chief executive officer of Exacis at the time of the Exacis Acquisition, was also a member of the Company’s board of directors at the time of the Exacis Acquisition.  Additionally, Dr. Angel, who was the Company’s chief executive officer at the time of the Exacis Acquisition, was chairman of Exacis’ scientific advisory board, and an affiliate of Factor Bioscience was the majority stockholder of Exacis at the time of the Exacis Acquisition.



In October 2022, the Company entered into an Option Agreement on October 8, 2022 with Exacis (the “Exacis Option Agreement”), pursuant to which Exacis granted the Company the option to negotiate and enter into an exclusive worldwide license to certain of the technology licensed by Exacis for the treatment of cancer in humans. The Exacis Option Agreement provided for the Company paying Exacis a fee of $250,000 for the option, which would be creditable against the fees or purchase price payable under any such license if entered into by the Company in accordance with Exacis Option Agreement. The Company did not exercise the option, and the Exacis Option Agreement terminated on December 31, 2022.


Consulting Agreement with Former Director



In May 2023, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Dr. Fiore, whereby Dr. Fiore agreed to provide business development consulting services to the Company for a monthly retainer of $20,000.  The consulting agreement was terminable for any reason by either party upon 15 days’ written notice. The Company terminated the consulting agreement, effective July 31, 2023. Dr. Fiore served on the Company’s board of directors from June 2022 to October 4, 2023.


July 2023 and December 2023 Financings



Investors in the July 2023 convertible note financing included Brant Binder, Richard Wagner, Charles Cherington and Nicholas Singer, and investors in the December 2023 convertible note financing included Messrs. Cherington and Singer. Each of them participated in the applicable financing under the same terms and subject to the same conditions as all the other investors. See Note 6 for additional information regarding the financings. Mr. Binder served on the Company’s board of directors from July 6, 2023 to August 8, 2023, Mr. Wagner served on the Company’s board of directors from July 6, 2023 to August 8, 2023, Mr. Cherington served on the Company’s board of directors from March 2021 to July 6, 2023, and Mr. Singer served on the Company’s board of directors from June 2022 to July 6, 2023.

Q4-22 PIPE


In November 2022, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain investors providing for the issuance of approximately of 2,185,000 units, each unit consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) two warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, at a purchase price of $3.53 per unit. The financing closed in December 2022. Messrs. Cherington and Singer invested in the financing on the same terms and subject to the same conditions as all other investors in the financing. Mr. Cherington served on the Company’s board of directors from March 2021 to July 6, 2023, and Mr. Singer served on the Company’s board of directors from June 2022 to July 6, 2023.

9)12)Accrued Expenses


Accrued expenses consisted of the following:following (in thousands):

  As of December 31, 
  2021
  2020 
Accrued compensation $656,000  $294,000 
Accrued research and development expenses  222,000   207,000 
Accrued general and administrative expenses  371,000   400,000 
Accrued interest  0   150,000 
Total accrued expenses $1,249,000  $1,051,000 

10)Debt

Loans Payable

In connection with the IRX Acquisition in 2018, Brooklyn LLC assumed certain notes payable (the “IRX Notes”) in the amount of $410,000. On January 27, 2020, the IRX Notes were amended to extend the maturity date to the earlier of (i) a change of control, as defined in the IRX Notes, and (ii) December 31, 2021. On December 31, 2021, the Company paid the outstanding $410,000 in principal plus accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $210,000 under the IRX Notes, and the Company has 0 further obligations thereunder.
  As of December 31, 
  2023
  2022 
Legal fees and related $643  $1,139 
Professional fees  239   124 
Somerville facility
  218   138 
Convertible Notes interest
  176   - 
Accrued compensation  109   1,065 
Clinical  18   570 
Other
  490   590 
Total accrued expenses $1,893  $3,626 

Payment Protection Program Loan

Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan.

On May 4, 2020, Brooklyn LLC issued a note in the principal amount of approximately $310,000 to Silicon Valley Bank evidencing a loan (the “Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan”) Brooklyn LLC received under the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (the “CARES Act”). Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan incurred interest at a rate of 1.0% per annum.

Under the terms of the Cares Act, certain amounts of the Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan could be forgiven if they were used for qualifying expenses, as described in the CARES Act. In June 2021, Brooklyn LLC submitted its loan forgiveness application for the Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan, and in September 2021, the lender informed Brooklyn LLC that the U.S Small Business Administration approved the forgiveness of 100% of the outstanding principal and interest of the Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan. As of December 31, 2021, there was 0 outstanding principal balance of the Brooklyn LLC PPP Loan.

11)13)Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters


The Company is involved in litigation and arbitrations from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Legal fees and other costs associated with such actions are expensed as incurred. In addition, the Company assesses the need to record a liability for litigation and contingencies. The Company reserves for costs relating to these matters when a loss is probable, and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Merger-Related Shareholder Litigation
Novellus, Inc. v. Sowyrda et al., C.A. No. 2184CV02436-BLS2

Brooklyn (then known as NTN Buzztime, Inc.) and its former directors were named as defendants in 10 substantially similar actions arising out of the Merger that were brought by purported pre-Merger stockholders of Brooklyn: Henson v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-08663-LGS (S.D.N.Y.); Monsour v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-08755-LGS (S.D.N.Y.); Amanfo v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-08747-LGS (S.D.N.Y.); Carlson v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-00047-LGS (S.D.N.Y.); Finger v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-00728-LGS (S.D.N.Y.); Falikman v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-05106-EK-SJB (E.D.N.Y.); Haas v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 3:20-cv-02123-BAS-JLB (S.D. Cal.); Gallo v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 3:21-cv-00157-WQH-AGS (S.D. Cal.); Chinta v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-01401-CFC (D. Del.); and Nicosia v. NTN Buzztime, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-00125-CFC (D. Del.) (collectively, the “Stockholder Actions”).  Only 2 of the Stockholder Actions (the Chinta and Nicosia cases) also named Brooklyn.  These actions asserted claims alleging violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder and both the Chinta and Nicosia cases alleged that Brooklyn LLC is a controlling person of Brooklyn.  The complaints generally alleged that the defendants failed to disclose allegedly material information in a Form S-4 Registration Statement filed on October 2, 2020, including:  (1) certain details regarding any projections or forecasts of Brooklyn or Brooklyn LLC may have made, and the analyses performed by Brooklyn’s financial advisor, Newbridge Securities Corporation; (2) conflicts concerning the sales process; and (3) disclosures regarding whether or not Brooklyn entered into any confidentiality agreements with standstill and/or “don’t ask, don’t waive” provisions.  The complaints generally alleged that these purported failures to disclose rendered the Form S-4 false and misleading.  The complaints requested: preliminary and permanent injunction of the Merger; rescission of the Merger if executed and/or rescissory damages in unspecified amounts; direction to the individual directors to disseminate a compliant Form S-4; an accounting by Brooklyn for all alleged damages suffered; a declaration that certain federal securities laws had been violated; and reimbursement of costs, including attorneys’ and expert fees and expenses.  On or about February 26, 2021, in order to moot certain of the disclosure claims asserted in the Stockholder Actions, to avoid nuisance, potential expense, and delay, and to provide additional information to Brooklyn’s stockholders, Brooklyn determined to voluntarily supplement the Form S-4 with certain additional disclosures.  In exchange for those disclosures, the plaintiffs in each of the Stockholder Actions agreed to voluntarily dismiss their claims.  All ten actions have now been dismissed.  Following the dismissal the parties amicably resolved plaintiffs’ counsel’s request for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses based on the purported benefit contented to be conferred on Brooklyn’s stockholders as a result of the supplemental disclosures.

Dhesh Govender v. Brooklyn Immunotherapeutics, LLC, et al., Index No. 650847/On October 25, 2021 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. 2021)

On or about February 5, 2021, Dhesh Govender, a former short-term consultant of Brooklyn LLC,Novellus, Inc. filed a complaint in the Superior Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk County, against Brooklyn LLCformer Novellus, Inc. employees Paul Sowyrda and John Westman and certain individuals that plaintiff alleges were directorsother former investors in Novellus LLC (Novellus, Inc.’s former parent company prior to the Company’s acquisition of Brooklyn LLC. The complaint is captioned, Dhesh Govender v. Brooklyn Immunotherapeutics, LLC, et al.Novellus, Inc.), Index No. 650847/2021 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. 2021). Plaintiff alleges that Brooklyn LLC and certainalleging breach of its officers and directors (“defendants”) engaged in unlawful and discriminatory conduct based on race, national origin and hostile work environment. Plaintiff also asserts variousfiduciary duty, breach of contract fraud and quantum meruitcivil conspiracy. The Company acquired Novellus, Inc. on July 16, 2021.  On May 27, 2022, Novellus, Inc. amended the complaint to withdraw all claims based on an alleged oral agreement pursuant to which he alleges Brooklyn LLC agreed to hire him as an executive once the Merger was completed. In particular, plaintiff alleges that, in exchange for transferring an opportunity to obtain an agreement to acquire a license from Novellus for its mRNA-based gene editingagainst all defendants except Messrs. Sowyrda and cell reprogramming technology to Brooklyn LLC, he was promised a $500,000 salary and 7% of the equity of Brooklyn LLC.  Based on these and other allegations, plaintiff seeks damages of not less than $10 million, a permanent injunction enjoining Brooklyn LLC from exercising the option to acquire such license from Novellus or completing the proposed Merger.Westman.  On or about February 19, 2021, an amended complaint was filed asserting the same causes of action but withdrawing the request for injunctive relief. On June 6, 2021, defendantsJuly 1, 2022, Mr. Westman filed a motion to compel arbitration or in the alternative, to stay the litigation pending the disposition of certain litigation in the Court of Chancery for partial dismissalthe State of Delaware filed by Mr. Sowyrda against Novellus LLC, Dr. Christopher Rohde, Dr. Matthew Angel, Leonard Mazur and Factor Bioscience, Inc. captioned Zelickson et al., v. Angel et al., C.A. 2021-1014-JRS and by Mr. Westman against Novellus LLC captioned Westman v. Novellus LLC, C.A. No. 2021-0882-NAC (together, the “Delaware Actions”).  On July 1, 2022, Mr. Sowyrda answered the complaint and asserted counterclaims against Novellus, Inc, and third-party defendants Dr. Angel and Dr. Rohde alleging violations of the complaintMassachusetts Wage Act, Massachusetts Minimum Fair Wage Law, the Fair Labor Standards Act, breach of contract, unjust enrichment and quantum meruit.  Mr. Sowyrda also joined in Mr. Westman’s motion to stay the case pending the Delaware Actions.  Novellus, Inc.’s claims and Mr. Sowyrda’s counterclaims relate to alleged conduct that took place before the Company acquired Novellus, Inc.



On November 15, 2022, prior to a decision on Messrs. Westman’s and Sowyrda’s motion to compel or stay, the parties agreed to voluntarily dismiss and consolidate the Delaware Actions with this action.  On December 15, 2022, Mr. Sowyrda filed an Amended Answer to the Amended Complaint, asserted affirmative defenses and filed Amended Counterclaims against Dr. Angel, Dr. Rohde, Novellus LLC, Novellus Inc., Factor Bioscience Inc., and the Company (collectively, the “Counterclaim Defendants”) alleging against various Counterclaim Defendants breach of contract, breaches of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, breaches of fiduciary duty, breaches of the operating agreement, aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty, tortious interference with contract, equitable accounting, violations of the Massachusetts Wage Act, Massachusetts Minimum Fair Wage Law, the Fair Labor Standards Act, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit.  Also on December 15, 2022, Mr. Westman filed an answer to the Amended Complaint and asserted similar counterclaims against the same Counterclaim Defendants.  Messrs. Westman and Sowyrda each asserted claims for failureindemnification and/or advancement against Novellus, Inc.  On January 11, 2023, Messrs. Westman and Sowyrda served a joint motion to state viable fraud, quantum meruitenforce their advancement and/or indemnification rights against Novellus Inc.  Novellus Inc. vigorously opposes this motion and employment discrimination claims. After obtaining extensionsserved its opposition on January 27, 2023.  On February 8, 2023, Messrs. Westman and Sowyrda served a reply in support of timetheir motion to respond, plaintiff opposed the defendants’ motion on August 9, 2021. The defendants filed their reply on September 3, 2021. The Court heard oral argument onenforce indemnification/advancement rights, and submitted the motion to compel arbitration and/orthe Court.  Novellus Inc. answered Messrs. Westman and Sowyrda’s counterclaims on January 27, 2023, denying liability.  The remaining Counterclaim Defendants served a motion to dismiss most of the remaining counterclaims on January 27, 2023.  The Court entered an order granting the Counterclaim Defendants’ motion to dismiss and thedenying Messrs.  Sowyrda and Westman’s motion to sealenforce on June 15, 2023.  The Court’s order dismissed all of Mr. Westman’s claims against Counterclaim Defendants except his claim for indemnification, and all of Mr. Sowyrda’s claims except his claim for indemnification and his employment-related claims, which Counterclaim Defendants did not move to dismiss.  On July 6, 2023, Messrs. Westman and Sowyrda filed a petition for interlocutory review with a single justice of the Massachusetts Appeals Court, seeking to overturn the judge’s decision granting the Counterclaim Defendants’ motion to dismiss most of the remaining counterclaims, but not the decision denying Messrs. Westman and Sowyrda’s motion to enforce advancement rights.  On July 25, 2023, the parties to the appeal filed a joint motion to the single justice in the appellate court to stay the appeal to allow for amended counterclaims to be filed by Counterclaim Plaintiffs and a motion to dismiss to be filed by Counterclaim Defendants.  Counterclaim Plaintiffs filed an initial set of amended counterclaims on August 15, 2023.  Counterclaim Plaintiffs amended and refiled their amended counterclaims on September 29, 2023.  Counterclaim Defendants served their motion to dismiss all of the amended counterclaims, except for Mr. Sowyrda’s employment-related claims, on October 13, 2021. By Order dated November 10, 2021,2023.



Under applicable Delaware law and Novellus Inc.’s organizational documents, the Court granted defendants’ motionCompany may be required to compel Govender to arbitrate alladvance or reimburse certain legal expenses incurred by former officers and directors of his claims against them, based on the arbitration clause of his consulting agreement with Brooklyn LLC.  Govender thereafter filed his Statement of Claim (the “Demand”)Novellus, Inc. in connection with the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”), Caseforegoing matters. However, a future advance or reimbursement is not currently probable nor can it be reasonably estimated.


eTheRNA Immunotherapies NV and eTheRNA Inc. v. Eterna Therapeutics Inc. C.A. No. 01-21-0017-9417, on December 15, 2021123CV11732


On July 31, 2023, eTheRNA Immunotherapies NV and eTheRNA Inc. filed a complaint in court against the same defendants, and served it on defendants’ counsel on February 3, 2022.  In his Demand, Govender continues to assert statutory discrimination claims against all defendants, claims against Brooklyn LLC premised on the breach of an alleged oral promise to issue Govender 7% of the equity of Brooklyn LLC and to employ Govender at a $500,000 annual salary in exchange for allegedly arranging and negotiating the Novellus license,Company alleging: (1) federal trademark infringement; (2) federal unfair competition; (3) Massachusetts state common law fraud claims against Brooklyn LLC and Cherington basedtrademark infringement; (4) Massachusetts state unfair competition.  Service of process for the complaint was completed on the breach of these same promises and a claim for quantum meruit against the Brooklyn LLC.  In his Demand, Govender now claims that the fair and reasonable value of his servicesAugust 1, 2023. The Company’s answer was filed on the quantum meruit claim exceeded $100 million and is seeking damages in an amount to be determined at the hearing.  Defendants filed an answering statement to the Demand on February 28, 2022 and the parties are in the process of conferring on the selection of a 3-member arbitration panel. Defendants intend to vigorously defend themselves against these claims.October 10, 2023. At this stage in the litigation, the Company is not able to predict the probability of a favorable or unfavorable outcome.


Dhesh Govender v. Eterna Therapeutics LLC, et al., Index No. 650847/2021 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. 2021)

Carlson v. Allen Wolff, Michael Gottlieb, Richard Simtob, Susan Miller,

On or about February 5, 2021, Dhesh Govender, a former short-term consultant of Eterna LLC, filed a complaint against Eterna LLC and certain individuals that plaintiff alleged were directors of Eterna LLC. Plaintiff alleged that Eterna LLC and certain of its officers and directors engaged in unlawful and discriminatory conduct based on race, national origin and hostile work environment. Plaintiff also asserted various breach of contract, fraud and quantum meruit claims based on an alleged oral agreement pursuant to which he alleged Eterna LLC agreed to hire him as an executive once the merger involving the Company and NTN Buzztime, Inc., C.A. No. 2021-0193-KSJM (Del. Ch. Ct.)

was completed. On or about March 12, 2021, Douglas Carlson, a purported stockholder of Brooklyn (then known as NTN Buzztime, Inc.), filed a verified class action complaint against Brooklyn and its then current members of the board of directors, for allegedly breaching their fiduciary duties and violating Section 211(c) of the Delaware General Corporation Law.  In particular, plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to hold an annual stockholder meeting.  Plaintiff also moved for summary judgment at the same time that he filed his complaint.  In order to moot the claim addressed in the complaint, Brooklyn agreed to hold its annual meeting on June 29, 2021, which date was subsequently rescheduled to August 20, 2021.  On or about May 6, 2021,December 15, 2022, the parties entered intoexecuted a stipulation, which was “so ordered” by the court, extending defendants’ time to respond to the complaintConfidential Settlement Agreement and to file their answering brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on or before July 16, 2021 and providing that plaintiff’s reply brief in supportRelease of his motion for summary judgment is due on or before August 20, 2021.All Claims. On or about July 12, 2021, the parties entered in a further amended scheduling order, which provided that defendants were to respond to the complaint and file their answering brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on or before September 16, 2021 and plaintiff was to file its reply brief in support of his motion for summary judgment on or before October 20, 2021.  On August 20, 2021, Brooklyn convened its 2021 annual meeting. Due to the lack of a required quorum, the meeting was adjourned to September 3, 2021. Thereafter, Brooklyn obtained a quorum, and the annual meeting was held on September 3, 2021. On September 10, 2021, Brooklyn filed a report on Form 8-K with the SEC announcing the results of the annual meeting. On September 16, 2021,January 11, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation seeking voluntary dismissal ofStipulation to Discontinue in the complaint as moot. The Court enteredaction. Also on January 11, 2023, plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the dismissal on September 16, 2021 with prejudice as to the named plaintiff and without prejudice as to other members of the purported class and retained jurisdiction for the purpose of determining any fee application to the extent it cannot be resolved amicably the parties. Thereafter, on or about November 12, 2022, the parties resolved plaintiff’s counsel’s request for an award of fees and expenses for the purported benefit that Carlson contended was received by stockholders as a result of his action. arbitration.


Robert Garfield MatterJohn Westman v. Novellus, Inc., Christopher Rohde, and Matthew Angel, Civil Action No. 2181CV01949 (Middlesex County (Massachusetts) Superior Court)


On April 29, 2021, Robert Garfield, a purported stockholder of Brooklyn, sent to Brooklyn a demand letter that had purportedly been sent to Brooklyn (then known as NTN Buzztime, Inc.) on or about MarchSeptember 7, 2021, John Westman, a former employee of Novellus, Inc. filed a complaint in Middlesex County (Massachusetts) Superior Court against Novellus, Inc. and Novellus, Inc.’s founders and former executives, Dr. Rohde and Dr. Angel.  The case includes allegations that Novellus, Inc. violated the Massachusetts Wage Act.  The Company acquired Novellus, Inc. on July 16, 2021.  The demand letter asserts that, Brooklyn (then known as NTN Buzztime, Inc.) made material misstatements in a prospectus issued in seeking a stockholder vote on March 15, 2021 with respectMr. Westman’s claims relate to an amendment to Brooklyn’s certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares from 15 million to 100 million. The demand letter seeks to have Brooklyn deem the amendment to the certificate of incorporation ineffective or seek valid stockholder approval of such amendment and for Brooklyn to implement internal controls.


Brooklyn decided to seek stockholder ratification of the March 15, 2021 stockholder vote concerning an amendment to Brooklyn’s certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares from 15 million to 100 million pursuant to Sections 204 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.  Stockholder ratification was obtained at the annual meeting of stockholdersalleged conduct that took place on September 3, 2021. As a result ofbefore the ratification, Garfield advised thatCompany acquired Novellus, Inc.   Mr. Westman agreed to dismiss the lawsuit and proceed with his claims set forth in his demand letter were moot. arbitration.  Following mediation, the parties settled this dispute in December 2022.



The parties thereafter resolved Garfield’s counsel’s request for an award of attorney’s fees and expensesaggregate settlement amount payable by the Company for the purported benefit that Garfield contentedWestman and Govender matters discussed above was received by stockholdersapproximately $0.5 million, both of which were recognized as a resultexpense in the consolidated statement of operations for the stockholder ratification.year ended December 31, 2022 and were fully paid
during the year ended December 31, 2023.

Edmund Truell Matter


On May 14, 2021, Edmund Truell, a stockholder of Brooklyn, alleged that he sustained a loss because he was unable to sell shares of common stock timely due to a delay caused by Brooklyn’s issuance of stock certificates in lieu of electronic book entry.

Emerald Private Equity Fund, LLC Matter



By a letter dated July 7, 2021, Emerald Private Equity Fund, LLC (“Emerald”), a stockholder of Brooklyn,the Company, made a demand pursuant to 8 Del. C. 220 to inspect certain books and records of Brooklyn.the Company. The stated purpose of the demand iswas to investigate possible wrongdoing by persons responsible for the implementation of the Mergermerger involving the Company and NTN Buzztime, Inc. and the issuance of paper stock certificates, including investigating whether: (i) Brooklyn’sthe Company’s stock certificates were issued in accordance with the Merger Agreement;merger agreement; (ii) certain restrictions on the sale of Brooklynthe Company’s common stock following the Mergermerger were proper and applied without favor; (iii) anyone received priority in post-Mergerpost-merger issuances of Brooklyn’sthe Company’s stock certificates that allowed them to benefit from an increase in the trading price of Brooklyn’sthe Company’s common stock; and (iv) it should pursue remedial measures and/or report alleged misconduct to the SEC. Brooklyn hasThe Company responded to the demand letter and has produced certain information to Emerald in connection with the demand, which is subject to the terms of a confidentiality agreement entered into among the parties, including certain additional stockholders who have subsequently joined as parties to such agreement.  Following discussions, with no admission of wrongdoing, the Company and Emerald entered into a confidential settlement agreement, (including Truell noted above).  In October 2021,pursuant to which the Company paid $1.2 million in 2022 in full settlement of all of the Emerald’s purported claims, including a release by the Emerald requested that Brooklyn produce additional information related toin favor of the authority, purposeCompany in respect of any and justification for the restriction imposed on the sale of Brooklyn common stock following the Merger and the timing of share delivery to Brooklyn stockholders, following which request Brooklyn agreed to produce certain additional information and emails relating to these topics.all such claims.


On March 30, 2022, counsel to Emerald advised the Company that it was prepared to file suit against the Company, certain current and former directors of the Company, and the Company’s financial advisor in connection with the Merger, on behalf of Emerald and a class of similarly situated stockholders with respect to some or all of the foregoing matters, alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty, conversion and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty.  Emerald’s counsel has expressed a willingness to engage in private pre-suit early resolution discussions with the Company and its financial advisor on behalf of individual stockholders whom counsel represents in addition to Emerald; and the Company has agreed to respond to Emerald’s counsel by April 22, 2022.  The Company can provide no assurance that such pre-suit early resolution discussions will be successful or that suit will not ultimately be filed against the Company, nor can the Company currently predict the outcome of any such suit, if filed.  The Company intends to defend itself vigorously against any and all claims.  Additionally, on April 7, 2022, the Company received a demand for indemnification from its financial advisor as it relates to the aforementioned potential lawsuit.

John Westman v. Novellus, Inc., Christopher Rohde, and Matthew Angel, Civil Action No. 2181CV01949 (Middlesex County (Massachusetts) Superior Court)

On or about September 7, 2021, John Westman, a former employee of Novellus, Inc. filed a Complaint in Middlesex County (Massachusetts) Superior Court against Novellus, Inc. and the company’s founders and former executives, Christopher Rohde and Matthew Angel (collectively, “Defendants”).  Brooklyn acquired Novellus, Inc. on July 16, 2021.  Mr. Westman’s claims relate to alleged conduct that took place before Brooklyn acquired Novellus, Inc.  Pursuant to the July 16, 2021 Agreement and Plan of Acquisition, as well as a separate agreement among Brooklyn, Novellus, Inc., Mr. Rohde, and Mr. Angel, Mr. Rohde and Mr. Angel are essentially assuming the defense of and paying the fees associated with defending against these claims.  To that end, on September 10, 2021, Morgan Lewis accepted service on behalf of all defendants. On December 24, 2021, Westman dismissed the case without prejudice so the parties could mediate the matter. The parties’ February 2022 mediation was unsuccessful, but Mr. Westman has not refiled suit.

Licensing Agreements


USFFactor Limited



On November 14, 2023, the Company and Factor Limited entered into the A&R Factor License Agreement, which terminated and superseded the exclusive license agreement between the parties dated February 20, 2023 and the amendment thereto.  See Note 11 for additional information regarding the A&R Factor License Agreement.




Brooklyn LLCThe Company has other license, collaboration and royalty agreements with third parties related to IRX-2, including an agreement entered into with University of South Florida Research Association, Inc. (“USF”USFRF”), granting Brooklyn LLC the right in February 2024 to sell, market, and distribute IRX-2, subject to a 7% royalty payable to USF based on a percentage of gross product sales. Under therevoke certain license agreementagreements with USF, Brooklyn LLC is obligated to repay patent prosecution expenses incurred by USF. To date, Brooklyn LLC has not recorded any product sales, or obligationsUSFRF related to USF patent prosecution expenses.IRX-2.  The license agreement terminates uponCompany does not intend to further develop IRX-2 and has provided USFRF with notice that the expiration ofCompany intends to abandon the IRX-2 patents. USFRF has 30 days to provide the Company with its notice to assume control of such patents.  As a result of abandoning the IRX-2 patents, the Company will no longer have any obligations under the existing related agreements. existing related agreements.


Novellus, Ltd. and Factor
Retirement Savings Plan


In December 2020, Brooklyn LLC entered into option agreements (the “Option Agreements”) with Novellus, Ltd. and Factor (together, the “Licensors”) to obtain the right to exclusively license the Licensors’ intellectual property and mRNA cell reprogramming and gene editing technology for use in the development of certain cell-based therapies to be evaluated and developed for treating human diseases, including certain types of cancer, sickle cell disease, and beta thalassemia (the “Licensed Technology”). The option was exercisable before February 28, 2021 (or April 30, 2021 if the Merger had not closed by that date) and required Brooklyn LLC to pay a non-refundable option fee of $500,000 and then an initial license fee of $4,000,000 (including the non-refundable fee of $500,000) in order to exercise the option.

In April 2021, Brooklyn LLC and the Licensors amended the Option Agreements to extend the exercise period to May 21, 2021 and to require Brooklyn, LLC to pay a total $1,000,000 of the $4,000,000 initial license fees to the Licensors by April 15, 2021.

In April 2021, Brooklyn LLC and the Licensors entered into an exclusive license agreement (the “License Agreement”) pursuant to which Brooklyn LLC acquired an exclusive worldwide license to the Licensed Technology.  Under the terms of the License Agreement, Brooklyn LLC is obligated to pay the Licensors a total of $4,000,000 in connection with the execution of the License Agreement, all of which had been paid as of June 30, 2021.


The completionCompany established a defined contribution plan, organized under Section 401(k) of the acquisition of Novellus, Ltd. relieved Brooklyn LLC from potential obligationsInternal Revenue Code, which allows employees to pay Novellus, Ltd. certain upfront fees, clinical development milestone fees and post-registration royalties under the License Agreement. The agreement with Factor under the License Agreement, which grants Brooklyn LLC exclusive rights to develop certain next-generation mRNA gene editing and cell therapy products, remained unchanged. Accordingly, Brooklyn LLC is obligated to pay to Factor a fee of $3,500,000 in October 2022, which will be in addition to a fee of $2,500,000 paid to Factor in October 2021.

Brooklyn LLC is also required to use commercially reasonably efforts to achieve certain delineated milestones, including specified clinical development and regulatory milestones and specified commercialization milestones. In general, upon its achievement of these milestones, Brooklyn LLC will be obligated to pay, in the case of development and regulatory milestones, milestone payments to the Licensors in specified amounts and, in the case of commercialization milestones, specified royalties with respect to product sales, sublicense fees or sales of pediatric review vouchers. In the event Brooklyn LLC fails to timely achieve certain delineated milestones, the Licensors will have the right to terminate Brooklyn LLC’s rights under provisions of the License Agreement relating to those milestones.

Novellus, Ltd. also has a license agreement with Factor, which was entered into in February 2015, amended in June 2018 and March 2020, and then amended and restated in November 2020.  This license agreement provides for Novellus, Ltd. to use over 70 granted patents owned by Factor throughout the world covering synthetic mRNA, RNA-based gene editing, and RNA-based cell reprogramming, in addition to specific patents covering methods for treating specific diseases. There are also more than 60 pending patent applications throughout the world focused on these and other aspects of the technology. The patent coverage includes granted patents and pending patent applications in the United States, Europe, and Japan, along with other major life sciences markets.

Novellus, Ltd. is required to use commercially reasonably efforts to achieve certain delineated milestones, including specified clinical development and regulatory milestones and specified commercialization milestones. In general, upon its achievement of these milestones, Novellus, Ltd. will be obligated, in the case of development and regulatory milestones, to make milestone payments ofdefer up to $51 million in aggregate to Factor and, in90% of their pay on a pre-tax basis. Beginning on January 1, 2023, the caseCompany began matching employees’ contributions at a rate of commercialization milestones, specified royalties with respect to product sales, sublicense fees or sales of pediatric review vouchers. In the event Novellus, Ltd. fails to timely achieve certain delineated milestones, Factor may have the right to terminate Novellus, Ltd.’s rights under provisions of the License Agreement relating to those milestones.


NoveCite

In October 2020, Novellus, Ltd. (as sublicensor) and NoveCite (as sublicensee) entered into an exclusive license agreement (the “Sublicense”) to license novel cellular therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome, which NoveCite is licensing from Factor. Under the sublicense agreement, NoveCite is required to use commercially reasonably efforts to achieve certain delineated milestones, including specified clinical development and regulatory milestones and specified commercialization milestones. In general, upon its achievement of these milestones, NoveCite will be obligated, in the case of development and regulatory milestones, to make milestone payments to the Novellus, Ltd. in specified amounts and, in the case of commercialization milestones, specified royalties with respect to product sales, sublicense fees or sales of pediatric review vouchers.

Under the terms of the Sublicense, in the event that Novellus, Ltd. receives any revenue involving the original cell line included in the licensed technology, then Novellus, Ltd. shall remit to NoveCite 50% of such revenue.

Royalty Agreements


Collaborator Royalty Agreement


Effective June 22, 2018, IRX terminated its Research, Development and Option Facilitation Agreement and its Options Agreement (the “RDO and Options Agreements”) with a collaborative partner (the “Collaborator”), pursuant to a termination agreement (the “Termination Agreement”). The Termination Agreement was assigned to Brooklyn, LLC in November 2018 when Brooklyn LLC acquired the assets of IRX. In connection with the Termination Agreement, all of the rights granted to the Collaborator under the RDO and Options Agreements were terminated, and Brooklyn LLC has no obligation to refund any payments received from the Collaborator. As consideration for entering into the Termination Agreement, the Collaborator will receive a royalty equal to 6% of revenues from the sale of IRX-2, for the period of time beginning with the first sale of IRX-2 through the later of (i) the twelfth anniversary100% of the first sale of IRX-2 or (ii) the expiration3% of the last IRX patent, or other exclusivityemployee’s contribution and 50% of IRX-2.
the next 2% of the employee’s contribution, for a maximum Company match of 4%. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company matched less than $0.1 million towards employees’ 401k contributions.
Investor Royalty Agreement


On March 22, 2021, Brooklyn LLC restated its royalty agreement with certain beneficial holders of Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics Investors GP LLC and Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics Investors LP, whereby such beneficial holders will continue to receive, on an annual basis, royalties in an aggregate amount equal to 4% of the net revenues of IRX-2, a cytokine-based therapy being developed by Brooklyn LLC to treat patients with cancer.


Royalty Agreement with certain former IRX Therapeutics Investors


On May 1, 2012, IRX Therapeutics entered into a royalty agreement (the “IRX Investor Royalty Agreement”) with certain investors who participated in a financing transaction. The IRX Investor Royalty Agreement was assigned to Brooklyn LLC in November 2018 when Brooklyn LLC acquired the assets of IRX. Pursuant to the IRX Investor Royalty Agreement, when Brooklyn LLC becomes obligated to pay royalties to USF under the agreement described above under “Licensing Agreements-USF,” it will pay an additional royalty of 1% of gross sales to an entity organized by the investors who participated in such financing transaction. There are no termination provisions in the IRX Investor Royalty Agreement. Brooklyn LLC has not recognized any revenues to date, and no royalties are due pursuant to any of the above-mentioned royalty agreements.

12)14)Basic
Basic and Diluted EarningsNet Loss per Common Share
 
Basic

The following table sets forth the computation of the net loss per share is calculated by dividingattributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted (in thousands, except per share data):
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2023  2022 
Numerator:      
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(21,684) $(24,595)
Denominator        
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted  5,314   3,051 
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $(4.08) $(8.06)

 Since the Company was in a net loss byposition for all periods presented, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without consideration of potential common shares.  Diluted net loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss byattributable to common stockholders was the weighted-average numbersame on a basic and diluted basis, as the inclusion of all potential common equivalent shares outstanding plus potential common shares.  Stockwould have been anti-dilutive.


The following table presents the amount of warrants, stock options, convertible preferred stock, convertible notes and restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and other convertible securities are considered potential common shares and are included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share using the treasury method when their effect is dilutive. The following table shows the amount of stock options, RSUs and convertible preferred stock that were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share of common sharestock for the yearyears ended December 31, 2021,2023 and 2022, as their effect was anti-dilutive:
anti-dilutive (in thousands):


Year ended
December 31, 2021
Stock options3,988,000
RSUs240,000
Preferred stock converted into common stock42,000
Total potential common shares excluded from computation4,270,000

There were 0 stock options, RSUs or convertible preferred stock outstanding prior to the Merger to exclude from diluted net loss per common share for the year ended December 31, 2020.
  Years ended December 31,
 

 2023  2022 
Warrants  18,922   4,713 
Convertible Notes converted into common stock  7,877   - 
Stock options  389   359 
Preferred stock converted into common stock  18   7 
RSUs  1   4 
Total potential common shares excluded from computation  27,207   5,083 

13)15)Stock-Based Compensation

Equity Incentive Plans


Brooklyn’s
The Company’s stock-based compensation plans consist of the Restated 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Restated 2020 Plan”) and the 2021 Inducement Equity Incentive Plan (the “2021 Inducement Plan”). Brooklyn’sThe Company’s board of directors has designated its compensation committee as the administrator of the foregoing plans (the “Plan Administrator”). Among other things, the Plan Administrator selects persons to receive awards under the foregoing plans and determines the number of shares subject to each award and the terms, conditions, performance measures, if any, and other provisions of the award.

At Brooklyn’s special meeting of stockholders held on March 15, 2021, the stockholders approved the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2020 Plan”), which provided for the issuance of up to approximately 3,369,000 shares of common stock. At Brooklyn’s annual meeting of stockholders held on September 3, 2021, the stockholders approved the
The Restated 2020 Plan which provides for (1) an increase in the number of(a) approximately 724,000 shares of common stock that can be issued under the Restated 2020 Plan, which includes an increase to the Restated 2020 Plan of 300,000 that was approved by 5,116,000 to 8,485,000 sharesthe Company’s stockholders at the 2023 annual meeting of common stock in totalstockholders on June 16, 2023, and (2)(b) an annual increase in the number of shares reserved for issuance on January 1 of each year from 2022 through 2031 equal to the lesser of (i) 5% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding on the immediately preceding December 31 and (ii) such smaller number of shares of common stock as may be determine by the board of directors (the “Annual Evergreen Shares”provision providing for the increase described in clause (b) is referred to as the “evergreen provision”). No otherAs of January 1, 2023, pursuant to the evergreen provision, the number of shares issuable under the Restated 2020 Plan were amended.was increased by approximately 256,000. Based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding on December 31, 2021,2023, as of January 1, 2024, pursuant to the maximum increase toevergreen provision, the number of Annual Evergreen Shares of common stock that can be issuedshares issuable under the Restated 2020 Plan in 2022 iswas increased by approximately 2,601,000 shares.271,000.


Awards under the Restated 2020 Plan may be granted to officers, directors, employees and consultants of the Company.  Stock options granted under the Restated 2020 Plan may either be incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options, may have a term of up to ten years, and are exercisable at a price per share not less than the fair market value, as defined in the Restated 2020 Plan, on the date of grant.



As of December 31, 2021,2023, there was approximately 684,000 shares of common stock remaining to be issued under the Restated 2020 Plan. As of December 31, 2023, there were approximately 320,000296,000 stock options and 18,000 RSUs outstanding under the Restated 2020 Plan.Plan and no RSUs granted under the Restated 2020 Plan were outstanding.


In June 2019 Brooklyn adopted the 2019 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”), Upon the approval of the 2020 Plan, no future grants could be made under the 2019 Plan. As of December 31, 2021, all outstanding options under the 2019 Plan either had been exercised or had expired in accordance with the terms of the applicable award or the 2019 Plan.


In May 2021, Brooklyn’s board of directors adopted theThe 2021 Inducement Plan which provides for the grant of up to 1,500,00075,000 share-based awards as material inducement awards to new employees in accordance with the employment inducement grant rules set forth in Section 711(a) of the NYSE American LLC Company Guide.Guide (the Company’s common stock was listed on the NYSE American at the time the 2021 Inducement Plan was adopted). The 2021 Inducement Plan expires in May 2031. As of December 31, 2023, there was approximately 68,000 shares of common stock remaining to be issued under the 2021 Inducement Plan. As of December 31, 2022, there were approximately 443,000 nonqualified4,000 stock options outstanding and 222,000approximately 1,000 RSUs outstanding that were granted under the 2021 Inducement Plan.
Equity Awards


Stock Options



The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation.  The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option award granted with service-based vesting requirements,options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company recognizes the fair value of stock options granted is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.period on a straight-lined basis.



The risk-free rate is based on the observed interest rates appropriate for the expected life. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of the stock options granted is estimated using the “simplified”simplified method as permitted by the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110, Share-Based Payment.Payment. Expected volatility is based on the volatility of the Company’s historical volatilitypeer group over the expected life of the stock option granted, and the Company assumes no dividends. Forfeitures are recognized as incurred.

There were 0 stock options outstanding or granted during the year ended December 31, 2020.

The following weighted-average assumptions were used for stock options granted during the yearyears ended December 31, 2021:2023 and 2022:

Year ended
December 31, 2021
Weighted average risk-free rate1.09%
Weighted average volatility134.64%
Dividend yield0%
Expected term6.10 years
  Year ended December 31, 
  2023  2022 
Weighted average risk-free rate  3.82%  2.52%
Weighted average volatility  95.15%  90.49%
Dividend yield  0%  0%
Expected term 5.44 years  5.79 years
 


The following table summarizes stock option activity for the yearyears ended December 31, 2021:2023 and 2022 (in thousands except for per-share and remaining contractual life data):

  
Outstanding
Options
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price per Share
  
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (in years)
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Outstanding January 1, 2021  0  $0   -  $0 
Granted  3,988,000   8.40   9.38   0 
Outstanding December 31, 2021  3,988,000  $8.40   9.38  $0 
                 
Options vested and exercisable at December 31, 2021  0  $0   -  $0 
  
Outstanding
Options
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price per
Share
  
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (in
years)
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Outstanding January 1, 2022  199
  $168   9.38  $- 
Granted  287   17         
Cancelled
  (127)  141         
Outstanding December 31, 2022  359  
57   7.57  
- 
Granted  237   4         
Cancelled  (207)  19         
Outstanding December 31, 2023  389  $45   7.04  $- 
                 
Options vested and exercisable at December 31, 2023  331  $50   6.69
  $- 


The per-share weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 was $7.57.$2.99 and $12.91, respectively.



As of December 31, 2021,2023, the unamortized stock-based compensation expense related to outstanding unvested options was approximately $21,915,000$0.6 million with a weighted average remaining requisite service period of 3.301.91 years. The Company expects to amortize this expense over the remaining requisite service period of these stock options.

Included in the 3,988,000

Vesting of all stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued 2 stock option grants to Howard J. Federoff, M.D., Ph.D. upon his appointment as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President.
Dr. Federoff was granted a nonqualified stock option covering approximately 2,628,000 shares of common stock (the “Time-Based Option”). The Time-Based Option was granted at a per share exercise price equal to the closing price of the common stock on the NYSE American stock exchange on the date of grant. Of the shares covered by the Time-Based Option, 25% will vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining shares will vest in substantially 36 equal monthly installments thereafter, so long as Dr. Federoff provides continuous service to the Company throughout the relevant vesting date.


Dr. Federoff was also granted a performance-based nonqualified stock option covering approximately 597,000 shares of common stock (the “Milestone Option”). The Milestone Option was granted at a per share exercise price equal to the closing price of common stock on the NYSE American stock exchange on the date of grant, and its fair value is $4,288,738. The Milestone Option will fully vest upon the first concurrence by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that a proposed investigation may proceed following review of a Company filed investigational new drug application in connection with that the License Agreement. This milestone is subject to Dr. Federoff’s continuous service with the Company through suchtheir applicable vesting date.
dates.
Both the Time-Based Option and the Milestone Option were granted outside the Company’s equity incentive plans discussed above.  The unvested portion of the Time-Based Option and the Milestone Option will be cancelled upon the termination of Dr. Federoff’s employment with the Company for any reason, subject to certain vesting acceleration provisions upon a qualifying termination, as described in his employment agreement with the Company. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with their terms, each of the Time-Based Option and the Milestone Option will otherwise expire on the tenth anniversary of their respective grant date and be subject to the terms and conditions of the respective option agreement approved by the Company. Each of the Time-Based Option and the Milestone Option was intended to constitute an “employment inducement grant” in accordance with the employment inducement grant rules set forth in Section 711(a) of the NYSE American LLC Company Guide and was offered as an inducement material to Dr. Federoff in connection with his hiring.


During the year ended December 31, 2021, there2022, the Company accelerated the vesting of approximately 40,000 stock options under certain time-based vesting stock option grants previously awarded to Dr. Howard Federoff, the Company’s former chief executive officer, pursuant to a separation agreement entered into with Dr. Federoff. The Company also waived a performance condition under a performance-based stock option grant and accelerated the vesting of approximately 21,000 stock options under such grant.  Lastly, the Company extended the post-termination exercise period from 90 days to 36 months immediately following his separation date for any options that were 1,300vested, including the options exercisedthat accelerating in vesting, as described above.



The above modifications to Dr. Federoff’s stock options grants resulted in modification accounting under ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. As a result, the Company immediately recognized approximately $0.1 million during 2022 for total cash proceeds of $10,202.  The options exercised had a total intrinsicthe incremental fair value of $47,010.  Therestock options that were 0vested prior to the modification by calculating the difference between the fair value of the modified award and the fair value of the original award immediately before it was modified.  For stock options exercisedthat were not vested prior to the modification but then vested as a result of the acceleration, the Company reversed any stock compensation expense previously recognized, remeasured the fair value of the modified award and immediately recognized approximately $0.1 million during 2022 of stock compensation expense in full since there was no future service period required to be provided.


Restricted Stock Units



The following table summarizes RSU activity for the yearyears ended December 31, 2020.2023 and 2022 (in thousands except for per-share data):

  
Outstanding
Restricted
Stock Units
  
Weighted
Average
Fair
Value per
Share
 
January 1, 2022  12
  $276 
Granted  55   39 
Released
  (3)  271 
Cancelled  (60)  61 
December 31, 2022  4   236 
Cancelled
  (3)  199 
December 31, 2023  1  $322 
         
Balance expected to vest at December 31, 2023  1  $
322 


The Company recognizes the fair value of RSUs granted as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. For performance based RSUs, the Company begins recognizing the expense once the achievement of the related performance goal is determined to be probable.

RSUs


Outstanding RSUs are settled in an equal number of shares of common stock on the vesting date of the award. An RSU award is settled only to the extent vested. Vesting generally requires the continued employment or service by the award recipient through the respective vesting date. Because RSUs are settled in an equal number of shares of common stock without any offsetting payment by the recipient, the measurement of cost is based on the quoted market price of the stock at the measurement date, which is the grant date.

There were 0

In lieu of paying cash to satisfy withholding taxes due upon the settlement of vested RSUs, outstanding or granted duringat the Company’s discretion, an employee may elect to have shares of common stock withheld that would otherwise be issued at settlement, the value of which is equal to the amount of withholding taxes payable. During the year ended December 31, 2020. 2023, less than 1,000 RSUs vested. During the year ended December 31, 2022, approximately 3,000 RSUs vested. The following table summarizes RSU activity forCompany withheld approximately 1,000 RSUs to cover withholding taxes, and the net 2,000 shares were issued upon settlement.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense


For the years ended December 31, 2021:

  
Outstanding
Restricted
Stock Units
  
Weighted
Average Fair
Value per Share
 
January 1, 2021  0  $0 
Granted  240,000   13.80 
December 31, 2021  240,000  $13.80 
         
Balance expected to vest at December 31, 2021  0     

NaN RSUs vested during2023 and 2022, the year ended December 31, 2021.


The Company recognizes the intrinsic value of RSUs granted as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. As of December 31, 2021, the unamortizedrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to outstanding RSUs was approximately $2,935,000 with a weighted average remaining requisite service period of 3.51 years. The Company expects to amortize this expense over the remaining requisite service period of these stock options.as follows (in thousands):


  Years ended December 31, 
  2023  2022 
Research and development $
234  $
1,249 
General and administrative  1,008   1,686 
Total $
1,242  $
2,935 

16)Equity and Warrants


Private Placements


Q4-22 PIPE Transaction



On November 23, 2022, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with certain investors pursuant to which the Company issued an aggregate of approximately 2.2 million units, with each unit consisting of (i) one share of common stock and (ii) two warrants, each exercisable to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $3.28 per, at a purchase price of $3.53 per unit (inclusive of $0.125 per warrant). The transaction closed on December 2, 2022. The Company received aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $7.7 million. The Company incurred fees of approximately $0.3 million through December 31, 2022 related to the transaction.



Each warrant had an exercise price of $3.28 per share (subject to customary adjustments), became exercisable six months from the date of issuance, and expires F-28five-and-one-half years from the date of issuance. The warrants meet the criteria for equity classification.



As discussed in Note 6, in connection with the December 2023 convertible note financing, the exercise price of the warrants was reduced from $3.28 per share to $1.43 per share.


Restricted StockQ1-22 Private Placement


Pursuant
On March 6, 2022, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with an investor pursuant to which the Merger, Brooklyn LLC’sCompany issued approximately 3,000 outstanding restricted343,000 units, each unit consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common units were exchangedstock (or, in lieu thereof, one pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of common stock) and (ii) one warrant to purchase one share of common stock, for an aggregate gross purchase price of approximately 630,000$12.0 million. The transaction closed on March 9, 2022. The Company issued 275,000 shares of Brooklyn’s restricted common stock. There were no changesstock, approximately 68,000 pre-funded warrants and warrants to any conditions and requirementspurchase approximately 343,000 shares of the restricted common stock. The shares vest quarterly beginning on March 31, 2021 and continuingCompany incurred fees of approximately $1.0 million through December 31, 2022. Due2022 related to the modification of the restricted common units, the fair value of the restricted common stock immediately after the Merger was comparedthis transaction, which were allocated to the fair value of the restricted common unitspre-funded warrants and warrants and Each pre-funded warrant had an exercise price of $0.10 per share (subject to customary adjustments), was immediately priorexercisable, could be exercised at any time, and had no expiration date.


Each warrant has an exercise price of $38.20 per share (subject to customary adjustments), became exercisable six months following the Merger,date of issuance, and expires five-and-one-half years from the changedate of issuance.



The pre-funded warrants and warrants were accounted for as liabilities under ASC 815-40, as these warrants provide for a cashless settlement provision that does not meet the requirements of the indexation guidance under ASC 815-40. These warrant liabilities are measured at fair value at inception and on a recurring basis, with changes in fair value of $250,000 was recognized inpresented within the statement of operationsoperations. (See Note 9 for more information related to changes in fair value.) Upon exercise, the fair value of the pre-funded warrants and/or warrants on the exercise date is reclassified from warrant liabilities to equity.



The fair values of the pre-funded warrants and warrants at the issuance date totaled $12.6 million in the aggregate, or $0.6 million more than the aggregate gross purchase price of the units sold in the offering. The $0.6 million represents an inducement to the investor to enter into the purchase agreement and was recorded in warrant liabilities expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.



On July 12, 2022, all the pre-funded warrants were exercised. The Company issued approximately 68,000 shares of common stock upon exercise and received approximately $7,000 of proceeds. The fair value of the pre-funded warrants as of the exercise date (approximately $0.7 million) was reclassified from warrant liabilities to equity.



In connection with the transaction, the Company and the investor also entered into a registration rights agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to prepare and file a registration statement with the SEC to register the resale of the shares of common stock issued in the offering and issuable upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants and warrants. The resale registration statement became effective on May 11, 2022.



Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, the Company is obligated to pay the investor liquidated damages equal to 2% of the purchase price for the units per month, with a maximum aggregate payment of 12 of the purchase price for the units, in the event the investor is not permitted to use the registration statement to resell the securities registered for resale thereunder for more than a specified period of time.



On May 24, 2022, the Company notified the investor that the investor was not able to use the registration agreement because the Company had not timely filed its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 with the SEC, and that the investor could not use the registration statement until the Company filed that quarterly report, which was filed on June 30, 2022. The Company accrued $0.2 million during 2022 for the contingent loss the Company incurred as liquidated damages as a result of the late filing, which is recorded in other expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2021.2022 in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company recognizespaid the fair value of restricted common stock as an expense on a straight-line basis over$0.2 million liquidated damages to the requisite service period.investor in June 2022.


Note Warrants

Stock-Based Compensation ExpenseAs discussed in Note 6, in connection with the July 2023 and December 2023 convertible note financings, the Company issued note warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 14.2 million shares of common stock.  The exercise price of all such warrants is currently $1.43 per share (subject to customary adjustments), are expire five years following the date of issuance. All such warrants qualified for equity classification.


Total stock-based compensation expenseThe following table shows the Company’s warrant activity for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20212023 (in thousands except for per-share data):


  
Q1-22 Common
Warrants
  
Q4-22
Warrants
  
July 2023
Warrants
  
December 2023
Warrants
  
Total
Warrants
 
Balance as of January 1, 2023  343   4,370   -   -   4,713 
Granted  -   -   6,094   8,115   14,209 
Balance as of December 31, 2023  343   4,370   6,094   8,115   18,922 

As of December 31, 2023, the weighted average remaining contractual life of the warrants outstanding was 4.68 years and 2020the weighted average exercise price was approximately $5,235,000 and $91,000, respectively.  Stock-based compensation is recorded in general and administrative expense and research and development expense in the statement of operations.$2.10 per share.

14)Stockholders’ and Members’ Equity (Deficit)
SEPA

Equity Line Offerings


On April 26, 2021, Brooklyn and5, 2023, the Company entered into the SEPA with Lincoln Park, executed the First Purchase Agreement and a related registration rights agreement. Pursuantpursuant to the First Purchase Agreement, Brooklyn had the right, but not the obligation, to sell towhich Lincoln Park and Lincoln Park would be obligatedcommitted to purchase up to $20,000,000$10.0 million of shares of Brooklyn’sthe Company’s common stock. SalesSuch sales of common stock by Brooklyn were subject to certain limitations, and could occur from time to time, at Brooklyn’s sole discretion. For entering into the First Purchase Agreement, Brooklyn issued to Lincoln Park approximately 56,000 shares of common shares as consideration for Lincoln Park’s commitment to purchase up to $20,000,000 in shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2021, Brooklyn issued and sold to Lincoln Park approximately 1,128,000 shares of common stock under the First Purchase Agreement for gross proceeds of $20,000,000, and 0 further shares may be sold to Lincoln Park under the First Purchase Agreement.

On May 26, 2021, Brooklyn executed the Second Purchase Agreement and a related registration rights agreement. Pursuant to the Second Purchase Agreement, Brooklyn has the right, but not the obligation, to sell to Lincoln Park, and Lincoln Park would be obligated to purchase, up to $40,000,000 of shares of Brooklyn’s common stock. Sales of common stock by BrooklynCompany, if any, are subject to certain conditions and limitations and may occur from time to time, at Brooklyn’s sole discretion. In consideration of Lincoln Park’s entryintoset forth in the Second Purchase Agreement, Brooklyn issued to Lincoln Park 50,000 shares of common stock.

Under the Second Purchase Agreement,SEPA, including a condition that the Company may direct Lincoln Park to purchase up to 60,000 shares of common stock on any business day (the “Regular Purchase”), which amount may be increased up to 120,000 shares based on the closing price of the common stock, provided that Lincoln Park’s maximum commitment in any single Regular Purchase may not exceed $2.0 million. The purchase price per share for each such Regular Purchase is based off of the common stock’s market immediately preceding the time of sale.

The Second Purchase Agreement also prohibits Brooklyn from directingdirect Lincoln Park to purchase any shares of common stock under the SEPA if those shares, when aggregated with all other shares of common stock then beneficially owned by Lincoln Park and its affiliates,such purchase would result in Lincoln Park and its affiliates having beneficial ownership, at any single point in time, ofbeneficially owning more than 4.99% of the then totalCompany’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Brooklyn hasSales under the rightSEPA may occur from time to terminate the Second Purchase Agreement at any time, at no cost or penalty.the Company’s sole discretion, through April 2025.


Actual sales
In consideration of Lincoln Park’s entry into the SEPA, the Company issued to Lincoln Park approximately 74,000 shares of common stock (the “Commitment Shares”).  The value of the Commitment Shares was recorded as a period expense and included in other expense, net, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for year ended December 31, 2023.



The Company evaluated the contract that includes the right to require Lincoln Park underto purchase shares of common stock in the Second Purchase Agreements dependfuture (“put right”) considering the guidance in ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging — Contracts on a variety of factors to be determined by us from time to time, including, among others, market conditions,an Entity’s Own Equity and concluded that it is an equity-linked contract that does not qualify for equity classification, and therefore requires fair value accounting. The Company analyzed the trading priceterms of the common stockfreestanding put right and determinations by the Companyconcluded that it has an immaterial value as to the appropriate sources of funding for the Company and its operations.
As of December 31, 2021, Brooklyn had2023.



During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company issued and sold approximately 2,424,000214,000 shares of common stock under the Second Purchase AgreementSEPA, including the 74,000 Commitment Shares, for total gross proceeds of approximately $34,106,000.$0.3 million.  As of December 31, 2021,2023, there were approximately 446,0002,860,000 shares remaining to be sold under the Second Purchase Agreement. Pursuant toSEPA.



In connection with entry into the securities purchase agreement in respect of the PIPE Transaction,SEPA, the Company is prohibited from issuing additional shares under the Section Purchase Agreement for a period of one-year immediately following the closing of the PIPE Transaction.

Reverse Stock-Split

On March 25, 2021, immediatelyterminated its prior to the Merger, Brooklyn filed an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporationpurchase agreements with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to effect a reverse stock split. As a result of the reverse stock split, the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock immediately prior to the reverse stock split was reducedLincoln Park entered into a smaller number of shares, such that every two shares of common stock held by a stockholder of Brooklyn immediately prior to the reverse stock split were combined and reclassified into one share of common stock after the reverse stock split.during 2021.


Immediately following the reverse stock split there were approximately 1,514,000 shares of common stock outstanding prior to the Merger. No fractional shares were issued in connection with the reverse stock split.


Merger

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement (see Notes 1 and 4), on March 25, 2021, Brooklyn issued shares of common stock to the equity holders of Brooklyn LLC. The 87,000 Class A units of Brooklyn LLC were converted into approximately 22,275,000 shares of common stock; the 15,000,000 Class B units were converted into approximately 2,515,000 shares of common stock; the 10,000,000 Class C units were converted into approximately 1,676,000 shares of common stock; approximately 630,000 shares of common units were converted into approximately 630,000 shares of common stock, and 10,500,000 rights options were converted into approximately 11,828,000 shares of common stock.  Brooklyn also issued approximately 1,068,000 shares of common stock to the Financial Advisor pursuant to the Merger Agreement.

Acquisition

Under the terms of the Acquisition (see Notes 1 and 4), on July 16, 2021, Brooklyn issued approximately 7,022,000 shares of common stock, of which approximately 3,644,000 shares are unrestricted and approximately 3,378,000 shares are subject to a three-year lockup agreement, provided that up to 75% of the shares of common stock subject to the lock-up agreement may be released from the lock-up restrictions earlier if the price of common stock on the principal market for the common stock exceeds specified thresholds.

Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock

As a result of the Merger, the

The Company has authorized 156,000 shares of preferred stock, all of which is designated as Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), and all of which were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021.2023.

 

The Series A Preferred Stock provides for a cumulative annual dividend of $0.10 per share, payable in semi-annual installments in June and December. Dividends may be paid in cash or with shares of common stock.The Company paid approximately $8,000$16,000 in cash and issued approximately 202 shares of common stock for payment of dividends during the yearyears ended December 31, 2021.2023 and 2022.



The Series A Preferred Stock has no voting rights and has a $1.00 per share liquidation preference over the Company’s common stock. The registered holder of shares of Series A Preferred Stock has the right at any time to convert such shares of Series A Preferred Stock into that number of shares of common stock that equals the number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock that are surrendered for conversion divided by the conversion rate.  At December 31, 2021,2023, the conversion rate was 3.70168.8016 and, based on that conversion rate, one share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock would have converted into approximately 0.270.11 shares of common stock, and all the outstanding shares of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock would have converted into approximately 42,00018,000 shares of common stock in the aggregate. There were 0no conversions during the yearyears ended December 31, 2021.2023 and 2022. There is no mandatory conversion term, date or any redemption features associated with the Series A Preferred Stock. The conversion rate will adjust under the following circumstances:


1.If the Company (a) pays a dividend or makes a distribution in shares of its common stock, (b) subdivides its outstanding shares of common stock into a greater number of shares, (c) combines its outstanding shares of common stock into a smaller number of shares, or (d) issues by reclassification of its shares of common stock any shares of its common stock (other than a change in par value, or from par value to no par value, or from no par value to par value), then the conversion rate in effect immediately prior to the applicable event will be adjusted so that the holders of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive the number of shares of common stock which they would have owned or have been entitled to receive immediately following the happening of the event, had the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock been converted immediately prior to the record or effective date of the applicable event.


2.If the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock are reclassified (other than a change in par value, or from par value to no par value, or from no par value to par value, or as a result of a subdivision, combination or stock dividend), or if the Company consolidates with or merge into another corporation and the Company is not the surviving entity, or if the Company sells all or substantially all of its property, assets, business and goodwill, then the holders of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will thereafter be entitled upon conversion to the kind and amount of shares of stock or other equity securities, or other property or assets which would have been receivable by such holders upon such reclassification, consolidation, merger or sale, if the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock had been converted immediately prior thereto.


3.If the Company issues common stock without consideration or for a consideration per share less than the then applicable Equivalent Preference Amount (as defined below), then the Equivalent Preference Amount will immediately be reduced to the amount determined by dividing (A) an amount equal to the sum of (1) the number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately prior to such issuance multiplied by the Equivalent Preference Amount in effect immediately prior to such issuance and (2) the consideration, if any, received by the Company upon such issuance, by (B) the total number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after such issuance. The “Equivalent Preference Amount” is the value that results when the liquidation preference of one share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (which is $1.00) is multiplied by the conversion rate in effect at that time; thus the conversion rate applicable after the adjustment in the Equivalent Preference Amount as described herein will be the figure that results when the adjusted Equivalent Preference Amount is divided by the liquidation preference of one share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

15)17)Income Taxes
 

Loss before income taxes consist of the following:following (in thousands):

 Years ended December 31,  Years ended December 31, 
 2021  2020  2023  2022 
(in thousands)
 
  
 
Domestic $(122,296,000) $(26,531,000) $(21,654) $(24,513)
Foreign  (5,000)  0   (17)  (21)
Total tax provision for income taxes $(122,301,000) $(26,531,000)
Total loss before income taxes $(21,671) $(24,534)


For each of the years ended December 31, 20212023 and 2020,2022, current tax provisions and current deferred tax provisions were recorded as follows:follows (in thousands):

 Years ended December 31,  Years ended December 31, 
 2021
  2020
  2023
  2022
 
Current Tax Provision            
Federal
 $0  $0  $-  $- 
State
  5,000   0   1   4 
Foreign
  0   0   -   - 
  5,000   0   1   4 
Deferred Tax Provision
                
Federal
  (5,836,000)  0   (2,155)  (6,851)
State
  (1,433,000)  (322,000)  8   (1,602)
Foreign
  (1,000)  0   (2)  (187)
  (7,270,000)  (322,000)  (2,149)  (8,640)
Change in valuation allowance  7,270,000   322,000   2,145   8,681 
Total tax provision for income taxes $5,000  $0 
Total tax (benefit) provision for income taxes
 $(3) $45 


Deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the effects of temporary differences as shown in the table below.below (in thousands). Deferred tax assets have been fully reserved by a valuation allowance since it is more likely than not that such tax benefits will not be realized.

 As of December 31,  As of December 31, 
 2021
  2020
  2023
  2022
 
Deferred Tax Assets:            
Net operating losses  5,454,000   747,000  $12,740  $9,382 
Foreign net operating losses
  595,000   0   784   782 
Stock compensation  2,141   2,173 
In-process research and development  1,009   1,233 
Capitalized rearch and development expenses  3,105   1,502 
R&D credit carryforwards  288,000   0   437   517 
Stock compensation  1,312,000   0 
Vacation accrual  30,000   0 
Contingent consideration  5,171,000   0 
Deferred rent  40,000   0 
Compensation accrual  3   81 
ROU Liabilities
  8,932   334 
Other
  132   549 
Total gross deferred tax assets  12,890,000   747,000   29,283   16,553 
Valuation allowance  (12,610,000)  (747,000)  (18,302)  (16,157)
Net deferred tax assets  280,000   0   10,981   396 
                
Deferred Tax Liabilities:                
Fixed assets  (168,000)  0   (6)  (10)
ROU Assets
  (8,349)  (291)
Convertible debt
  (2,507)  - 
Intangibles - goodwill  (112,000)  0   (179)  (160)
Total deferred tax liabilities  (280,000)  0   (11,041)  (461)
Net deferred taxes $0  $0  $(60) $(65)


The reconciliation of computed expected income taxes to effective income taxes by applying the federal statutory rate of 21% is as follows:

  As of December 31, 
   2021   2020 
Tax at federal income tax rate  21.00%  21.00%
State income tax, net of federal tax  1.17
  0 
Non-deductible expenses/excludable items  (16.33)  0 
Pass-through loss
  0   (19.79)
Change in valuation allowance  (5.94)  (1.21)
Credits  0.24  0 
Other  (0.14)  0 
Provision for income taxes  0.00%
  0.00%
 
  As of December 31, 
  2023  2022 
Tax at federal income tax rate  21.00%  21.00%
State income tax, net of federal tax  4.92%  6.52%
Foreign tax differential  (0.01%)  (0.01%)
Non-deductible expenses/excludable items  (0.74%)  6.09%
Change in valuation allowance  (9.90%)  (35.38%)
Convertible debt  (11.92%)  0.00%
Credits  0.00%
  0.98%
Uncertain tax positions
  0.00%  (0.49%)
Other  (3.34%)  1.11%
Benefit (provision) for income taxes  0.01%  (0.18%)

 

The net increase in the total valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 20212023 was an increase of $11,863,000 of which $7,270,000 relates to the current year deferred expense and $4,593,000 relates to the purchase accounting related to the 2021 business combinations.approximately $2.1 million. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during periods in which those temporary difference become deductible. Management considered the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and planning strategies in making this assessment.  Based on the level of historical operating results and projections for the taxable income for the future, management has determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred taxes assets will not be utilized. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance. The net deferred tax liability represents an indefinite life intangible liability related to tax deductible goodwill, partially offset by an indefinite life deferred tax asset.
F-32


At December 31, 20212023 and 20202022, the Company has available net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $20,679,000$48.4 million and $0$35.6 million for federal income tax purposes, respectively, of which $20,679,000approximately $48.4 million can be carried forward indefinitely. The Company has available $1,397,000$39.6 million and $747,000$28.8 million state NOLs for the years ended December 31, 20212023 and 2020,2022, respectively. The Company also has foreign NOL carryforwards of $4,759,000 and $0approximately $6.3 million for each of the years ended December 31, 20212023 and 2020, respectively,2022, which carry forward indefinitely. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) imposes limits on the ability to use NOL carryforwards that existed prior to a change in control to offset future taxable income. Such limitations would reduce, potentially significantly, the gross deferred tax assets disclosed in the table above related to the NOL carryforwards.  The Company continues to disclose the NOL carryforwards at their original amount in the table above as no potential limitation has been quantified. The Company has also established a full valuation allowance for all deferred tax assets, including the NOL carryforwards, since the Company could not conclude that it was more likely than not able to generate future taxable income to realize these assets.

 

At December 31, 20212023 and 20202022 the Company has federal and state income tax credit carryforwards of approximately $288,000$0.4 million and $0,$0.5 million, respectively. The credits begin to expire in 2041.


In accordance with authoritative guidance, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. The following table summarizes amounts the Company has 0recorded for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 20212023 and 2022 (in thousands):


  As of December 31, 
  2023
  2022
 
Beginning balance of uncertain tax positions $121  $- 
Additions based on current year’s tax positions  -   45 
Net changes based on prior year’s tax positions  272   76 
Ending balance of uncertain tax positions $393  $121 


It is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits may increase or December 31, 2020.decrease within the next twelve months due to tax examination changes, expiration of statute of limitations, or changes in tax law.  The Company does not anticipate any significant changes to unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months.


The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions within the income tax expense line in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. There were 0no accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 20212023 or December 31, 2020.2022.


The Company is subject to U.S. federal, state, and foreign income tax. TtheThe Company’s income tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authorities. As of December 31, 2021,2023, the 2018202020212023 tax years remain subject to examination in the U.S. federal tax, various state, and foreign tax jurisdictions. The Company is not currently under examination by federal state, or foreign jurisdictions.


On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”) was enacted into law. Among other changes to the tax code, the IRA imposes a 1% excise tax on certain repurchases of corporate stock by certain publicly traded corporations. The 1% stock buyback tax applies to redemptions by domestic corporations occurring in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022.  A number of exceptions to the stock buyback tax are available including exceptions to certain reorganizations. However, while these exceptions may be helpful in limiting the application of the stock buyback tax in situations in which it was not intended to apply, more guidance will be necessary for taxpayers to analyze the potential application of these exceptions and whether they will be able to rely upon them.

16)18)Retirement Savings PlanSubsequent Event
The Company established a defined contribution plan, organized under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, which allows employees to defer up to 90% of their pay on a pre-tax basis. The Company does not contribute a match to the employees’ contribution.
17)Subsequent Events
Private Placement of Equity

On March 6, 2022, the Company entered into a certain Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with an investor (the “PIPE Investor”) providing for the private placement (the “PIPE Transaction”) to a private investor (the “PIPE Investor”) of approximately 6,857,000 units (collectively, the “Units”), each Unit consisting of (i) 1 share of our common stock (or, in lieu thereof, one pre-funded warrant (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”) to purchase one share of common stock) and (ii) 1 warrant (the “Common Warrants”) to purchase one share of common stock, for an aggregate gross purchase price of approximately $12.0 million. The PIPE Transaction closed on March 9, 2022.

CEO Inducement Grant

Each Pre-Funded Warrant

On January 1, 2024, Sanjeev Luther was appointed as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. Upon his appointment, he was granted a non-qualified stock option to purchase approximately 1,685,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The stock option has an exercise price of $0.005$1.80 per share, which was equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock was immediately exercisable and may be exercised at any time and has no expiration date and is subject to customary adjustments. The Pre-Funded Warrants may not be exercised if the aggregate number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the holder thereof would exceed 9.99% immediately after exercise thereof.

Each Common Warrant has an exercise price of $1.91 per share, becomes exercisable six months following the closing of the PIPE Transaction, and expires five-and-one-half years fromon the date of issuance, and is subject to customary adjustments. The Common Warrants may not be exercised if the aggregate number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the holder thereof would exceed 4.99% immediately after exercise thereof, subject to increase to 9.99% at the option of the holder.
In connectiongrant, will vest over four years, with the PIPE Transaction, the Company and the PIPE Investor also entered into a registration rights agreement, dated March 6, 2022, pursuant to which the Company agreed to prepare and file a registration statement with the SEC no later than 15 days following the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to register the resale25% of the shares vesting on the first anniversary of common stock included in the Unitsgrant date and the shares of common stock issuable upon exerciseremaining 75% of the Pre-Funded Warrants andshares vesting in equal monthly installments over the Common Warrants. The Company agreed to use its best efforts to have such registration statement declared effective as promptly as possible after the filing thereof,three years thereafter, in each case, subject to certain specified penalties if timely effectiveness is not achieved.
continued service. The stock option was granted pursuant to the terms of Mr. Luther’s employment agreement and as a material inducement to his joining the Company in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c)(4).

Reduction in Force

Remaining Funding Received from December 2023 Financing


On January 3, 2022,11, 2024, the second and final closing of the December 2023 convertible note financing occurred. At this closing, the Company completed a reduction in force (the “Reduction”), comprising 8 employees (53%received approximately $1.4 million and issued an aggregate of our workforce at that time), effective January 3, 2022, which was the date on which the Company notified such employees$1.4 million of their termination. The Company believes the Reduction, which was approved by its BoardDecember 2023 convertible notes and note warrants to purchase approximately 1.5 million shares of Directors, will enable the Company to better align its workforce with the needs of its business and focus more of its capital resources on the Company’s cell therapy and gene editing platform, as it continues to sustain its investment in the prosecution of IRX-2 through the end of the INSPIRE Phase 2B study. In connection with the Reduction, the Company estimates that it will incur approximately $500,000 for severance and termination-related costs, which the Company will record during the first quarter of 2022. The Company may also incur additional costs and non-cash charges that are not currently contemplated or determinable, which may occur as a result of the Reduction.
common stock.

Lease Assignment

On March 5, 2022, the Company entered into an Agreement to Assign Space Lease with RegenLab USA LLC (“Regen”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to assign its Brooklyn, NY lease (the “Brooklyn Lease”) to Regen. The effective date

On March 25, 2022, the Company entered into an Assignment and Assumption of Lease Agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”) with Regen, the consent of which was provided by the Landlord in the Assignment Agreement. The effective date of the assignment was March 28, 2022. Under the Assignment Agreement, Regen (i) accepts the assignment of the Brooklyn Lease; (ii) assumes all of the obligations, liabilities, covenants and conditions of the Company’s as tenant under the Brooklyn Lease; (iii) assumes and agrees to perform and observe all of the obligations, terms, requirements, covenants and conditions to be performed or observed by the Company under the Brooklyn Lease; and (iv) makes all of the representations and warranties binding under the Brooklyn Lease withDecember 2023 convertible notes issued on January 11, 2024 have the same force and effectterms as if Regens had executedthose issued on December 15, 2023, except that the Brooklyn Lease originallyone issued on January 11, 2024 expire on January 11, 2029. The note warrants issued on January 11, 2024 have the same terms as the tenant.

Notwithstandingnote warrants issued on December 15, 2023, except that the above assumptions above by Regen,one issued on January 11, 2024 expire on January 11, 2029. See Note 6 for more information regarding the Company shall be and remain liable and responsible forDecember 2023 convertible note financing, the due keeping, and full performance and observance, of all the provisions of the Brooklyn Lease on the part of the tenant to be kept, performed and observed. As a result of the Assignment Agreement, the Company will write off the remaining ROU asset balanceDecember 2023 convertible notes and the corresponding lease liability as of March 25, 2022, and it will record any resulting gain or loss on the termination of the Brooklyn lease in its statement of operations.  The Company does not expect to recognize a contingent liability for its ongoing obligation to remain liable and responsible for all the provisions of the Brooklyn Lease, as the Company has determined that it is not probable it will recognize a loss under the Assignment Agreement.note warrants.

New Lease Agreement

On March 31, 2022, the Company entered into the Torrey Pines Science Center Lease in San Diego, California (the “San Diego Lease”) with Torrey Pines Science Center Limited Partnership for approximately 5,200 square feet of lab and office space. The term of the San Diego Lease is 62 months and the lease commencement date begins on the earlier to occur of (i) the date the Company first commences to conduct business in the premises or (ii) the possession date, which is anticipated to be August 1, 2022 (or earlier if the current tenant terminates its lease early). The lease commencement date was April 15, 2022.
F-35


Base rent is $6.35 per square foot in the first year of the San Diego Lease, with a rent abatement for the second and third full months of the first year. The base rent will increase by approximately 3% on each anniversary of the lease commencement date. The Company is also required to pay its share of operating expenses and property taxes. The San Diego Lease provides for a one-time option to extend the lease term for an additional five years at the then fair rental value.


F-34