Table of Contents

     
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)  
þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20132014
or
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 001-16503
_____________________
WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS PUBLIC
LIMITED COMPANY
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Ireland
 (Jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
98-0352587
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) 
c/o Willis Group Limited
51 Lime Street, London EC3M 7DQ, England
(Address of principal executive offices)
(011) 44-20-3124-6000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each Class
 Ordinary Shares, nominal value $0.000115 per share
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
 New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
_____________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes þ     No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ     No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definite proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of ‘large accelerated filer’, ‘accelerated filer’ and ‘smaller reporting company’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o
  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o     No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the last reported price at which the Registrant’s common equity was sold on June 30, 20132014 (the last day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second quarter) was $7,147,793,4507,746,228,885.
As of February 14, 2014,20, 2015, there were outstanding 179,021,595179,479,552 ordinary shares, nominal value $0.000115 per share, of the Registrant.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of Part III will be incorporated by reference in accordance with Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K no later than April 30, 2014.2015.
     



Table of Contents

Certain Definitions
The following definitions apply throughout this annual report unless the context requires otherwise:
‘We’, ‘Us’, ‘Company’, ‘Group’, ‘Willis’, or ‘Our’ Willis Group Holdings and its subsidiaries.
‘Willis Group Holdings’ or ‘Willis Group Holdings plc’ or ‘WGH’ Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, a company organized under the laws of Ireland.
‘shares’ The ordinary shares of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, nominal value $0.000115 per share.
‘HRH’ Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, a 100 percent owned subsidiary acquired in 2008.


2



Table Of Contents
   Page
    
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


3

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We have included in this document 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by those laws. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our operations. All statements, other than statements of historical facts that address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate may occur in the future, including such things as our, outlook future capital expenditures, growth in commissions and fees, business strategies, competitive strengths, goals, the benefits of new initiatives, growth of our business and operations, plans and references to future successes, are forward-looking statements. Also, when we use the words such as 'anticipate', 'believe', 'estimate', 'expect', 'intend', 'plan', 'probably', or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements.

There are important uncertainties, events and factors that could cause our actual results or performance to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements contained in this document, including the following:

the impact of any regional, national or global political, economic, business, competitive, market, environmental or regulatory conditions on our global business operations;
the impact of current global economic conditions on our results of operations and financial condition, including as a result of those associated with the ongoing Eurozone, crisis, any insolvencies of or other difficulties experienced by our clients, insurance companies or financial institutions;
our ability to implement and fully realize anticipated benefits of any expense reduction initiative, charge or anyour growth strategy and revenue generating initiatives;
our ability to implement and fully realize anticipated benefits of any cost-savings initiative, including our new growth strategyability to achieve expected savings from the multi-year operational improvement program as a result of unexpected costs or delays and revenue generatingdemand on managerial, operational and cost-saving initiatives;administrative resources and/or macroeconomic factors affecting the program;
volatility or declines in insurance markets and premiums on which our commissions are based, but which we do not control;
our ability to develop and implement technology solutions and invest in innovative product offerings in an efficient and competitive manner;
our ability to continue to manage our significant indebtedness;
our ability to compete effectively in our industry, including any impact if we continue to refuse to accept contingent commissions to date from carriers in the non-Human Capital areas of our retail brokerage business and developing new products and services;industry;
material changes in commercial property and casualty markets generally or the availability of insurance products or changes in premiums resulting from a catastrophic event, such as a hurricane;
our ability to retain key employees and clients and attract new business;
our ability to develop new products and services;
our ability to develop and implement technology solutions and invest in innovative product offerings in an efficient and effective manner;
fluctuations in our earnings as a result of potential changes to our valuation allowance(s) on our deferred tax assets;
changes in the tax or accounting treatment of our operations and fluctuations in our tax rate;
our ability to achieve anticipated benefits of any acquisition or other transactions in which we may engage, including any revenue growth or operational efficiencies;
our ability to effectively integrate any acquisition into our business;
our inability to exercise full management control over our associates;
our ability to continue to manage our significant indebtedness;
the timing or ability to carry out share repurchases and redemptions;
the timing or ability to carry out refinancing or take other steps to manage our capital and the limitations in our long-term debt agreements that may restrict our ability to take these actions;
fluctuations in our earnings as a result of potential changes to our valuation allowance(s) on our deferred tax assets;
any material fluctuations in exchange and interest rates that could adversely affect expenses and revenue;
a significant decline in the potential costs and difficultiesvalue of investments that fund our pension plans or changes in complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations and any related changes, given the global scope of our operations;pension plan liabilities or funding obligations;
rating agency actions, including a downgrade to our credit rating, that could inhibit our ability to borrow funds or the pricing thereof and in certain circumstances cause us to offer to buy back some of our debt;
a significant decline in the value of investments that fund our pension plans or changes in our pension plan liabilities or funding obligations;
our ability to achieve the expected strategic benefits of transactions, including any growth from associates;
further impairment of the goodwill of one of our reporting units, in which case we may be required to record additional significant charges to earnings;
our ability to receive dividends or other distributions in needed amounts from our subsidiaries;
the practical challenges and costs of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations and any related changes, ingiven the tax or accounting treatmentglobal scope of our operations and fluctuations in our tax rate;
any potential impact from the US healthcare reform legislation;associated risks of non-compliance and regulatory enforcement action;
our involvement in and the results of any regulatory investigations, legal proceedings and other contingencies;
underwriting, advisory or reputational risks associated with non-core operations as well as the potential significant impact our non-core operations (including the Willis Capital Markets & Advisory operations) can have on our financial results;

4

Table Of Contents

About Willis

our exposure to potential liabilities arising from errors and omissions and other potential claims against us; and
underwriting, advisory or reputational risks associated with our business;

4

Table Of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


the interruption or loss of our information processing systems, data security breaches or failure to maintain secure information systems.systems; and
impairment of the goodwill in one of our reporting units, in which case we may be required to record significant charges to earnings.

The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive and new factors may emerge from time to time that could also affect actual performance and results.

Although we believe that the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of these assumptions, and therefore also the forward-looking statements based on these assumptions, could themselves prove to be inaccurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included in this document, our inclusion of this information is not a representation or guarantee by us that our objectives and plans will be achieved.

Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made and we will not update these forward-looking statements unless the securities laws require us to do so. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this document may not occur, and we caution you against unduly relying on these forward-looking statements.



5

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


PART I
Item 1 — Business
History and Development of the Company
Willis Group Holdings is the ultimate holding company for the Group. We trace our history to 1828 and are one of the largest insurance brokers in the world.
Willis Group Holdings was incorporated in Ireland on September 24, 2009 to facilitate the change of the place of incorporation of the parent company of the Group from Bermuda to Ireland (the ‘Redomicile’). At December 31, 2009, the common shares of Willis-Bermuda were canceled, the Willis-Bermuda common shareholders received, on a one-for-one basis, new ordinary shares of Willis Group Holdings, and Willis Group Holdings became the ultimate parent company for the Group.
For administrative convenience, we utilize the offices of a subsidiary company as our principal executive offices. The address is:

Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company
c/o Willis Group Limited
The Willis Building
51 Lime Street
London EC3M 7DQ
England
Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company
c/o Willis Group Limited
The Willis Group
51 Lime Street
London EC3M 7DQ
England
Tel: +44 20 3124 6000

For several years, we have focused on our core retail and specialist broking operations. In 2008, we acquired HRH, at the time the eighth largest insurance and risk management intermediary in the United States. The acquisition almost doubled our North America revenues and created critical mass in key markets including California, Florida, Texas, Illinois, New York, Boston, New Jersey and Philadelphia. In addition, we have made a number of smaller acquisitions around the world and increased our ownership in several of our associates and existing subsidiaries, which were not wholly-owned, where doing so strengthened our retail network and our specialty businesses.
Available Information
The Company files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘SEC’). You may read and copy any documents we file at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the Public Reference Room. The SEC maintains a website that contains annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information that issuers (including Willis Group Holdings) file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s website is www.sec.gov.
The Company makes available, free of charge through our website, www.willis.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our proxy statement, current reports on Form 8-K and Forms 3, 4, and 5 filed on behalf of directors and executive officers, as well as any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘Exchange Act’) as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Unless specifically incorporated by reference, information on our website is not a part of this Form 10-K.
The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Audit Committee Charter, Risk Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter are available on our website, www.willis.com, in the Investor Relations-Corporate Governance section, or upon request. Requests for copies of these documents should be directed in writing to the Company Secretary c/o Office of General Counsel, Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, One World Financial Center,Brookfield Place, 200 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10281.

General
We provide a broad range of insurance brokerage, reinsurance and risk management consulting services to our clients worldwide. We have significant market positions in the United States, in the United Kingdom and, directly and through our

6

Table Of Contents

About Willis

associates, in many other countries. We are a recognized leader in providing specialized risk management advisory and other services on a global basis to clients in variousmany industries including aerospace, marine, construction and energy.
In our capacity as an advisor and insurance broker, we act as an intermediary between our clients and insurance carriers by advising our clients on their risk management requirements, helping clients determine the best means of managing risk, and negotiating and placing insurance with insurance carriers through our global distribution network.

6

Table Of Contents

About Willis

We assist clients in the assessment of their risks, advise on the best ways of transferring suitable risk to the global insurance and reinsurance markets and then execute the transactions at the most appropriate available price, terms and conditions for our clients. Our global distribution network enables us to place the risk in the most appropriate insurance or reinsurance market worldwide.
We also offer clients a broad range of services to help them to identify and control their risks. These services range from strategic risk consulting (including providing actuarial analysis), to a variety of due diligence services, to the provision of practical on-site risk control services (such as health and safety or property loss control consulting) as well as analytical and advisory services (such as hazard modeling and reinsurance optimization studies). We assist clients in planning how to manage incidents or crises when they occur. These services include contingency planning, security audits and product tampering plans. We are not an insurance company and therefore we do not underwrite insurable risks for our own account.
We derive most of our revenues from commissions and fees for brokerage and consulting services and do not determine the insurance premiums on which our commissions are generally based. Commission levels generally follow the same trend as premium levels as they are derived from a percentage of the premiums paid by the insureds. Fluctuations in these premiums charged by the insurance carriers can therefore have a direct and potentially material impact on our results of operations.
We and our associates serve a diverse base of clients including major multinational and middle-market companies in a variety of industries, as well as public institutions and individual clients. Many of our client relationships span decades. We have approximately 21,70022,100 employees around the world (including approximately 3,700 at our associate companies) and a network of in excess of 400 offices in nearly 120 countries.
We believe we are one of only a few insurance brokers in the world possessing the global operating presence, broad product expertise and extensive distribution network necessary to meet effectively the global risk management needs of many of our clients.

7

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Business Strategy
Today we operate in attractive growth markets with a diversified platform across geographies, industries, segments and lines of business. We aim to become the risk advisor, insurance and reinsurance broker of choice globally.
We willbelieve we can achieve this by being completely focusedfocusing on:
whereGrowing our existing business organically. We help clients of all sizes and in every segment when we competeform teams of the right people from across our business that can provide every risk and human capital and benefits service the client needs. We call this team-based way of working ‘Connecting Willis’.
In the Connecting Willis model, client advocates ensure that meansour teams deliver a seamless service of tailored capabilities to every client including:
Regional and local market expertise
Industry and product specialist capabilities
Global placement knowledge and data
Cutting-edge analytics to address evolving risks
Strategic mergers and acquisitions that add geographic reach, industry expertise, new product offerings, and analytic capabilities. Every company in our portfolio is home to people who want to work at Willis.
Operational improvement that underpins our growth. We are modernizing the areas whereway we can succeed by:
Geography - we will re-balance our business mix towards faster growing geographies, with both developed and developing markets
Client Segmentation - we will segment our client offering to provide distinct offerings to different types of client, focusing on the value we provide to our clients
Sector - we will build business lines around our industry and sector strength e.g. Human Capital and Employee Benefits.
How we compete which will be centered on meetingrun our business in order to serve our clients better, enable the needsskills of our client by:staff, and to lower our costs of doing business. Our Operational Improvement Program is making changes to our processes, our IT, our real estate and the location of our workforce. The Program is making us more effective and efficient, bringing us into line with other modern professional services firms.
Finally, we care as much about how we work as we do about the impact that we make. This means commitment to our values and behaviors, a framework that guides how we run our business and serve clients. Our values - integrity, advocacy, teamwork, respect, and development - help us to attract and retain the best and most diverse talent in our industry and beyond.

7
Connection - leading to more cross-selling
Innovation - competing on analytics and innovation
Investment - focusing on earnings accretion, competitive position and fit


Willis Group Holdings plc


Through these strategies we aim to grow revenue with positive operating leverage, grow cash flows and generate compelling returns for investors.

8


About Willis

Our Business

Insurance and reinsurance is a global business, and its participants are affected by global trends in capacity and pricing. Accordingly, we operate as one global business which ensures all clients' interests are handled efficiently and comprehensively, whatever their initial point of contact. For information regarding revenues and operating income per segment, see Note 2826 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein.

Global

Our Global business provides specialist brokerage and consulting services to clients worldwide for the risks arising from specific industrial and commercial activities. In these operations, we have extensive specialized experience handling diverse lines of coverage, including complex insurance programs, and acting as an intermediary between retail brokers and insurers. We increasingly provide consulting services on risk management with the objective of assisting clients to reduce the overall cost of risk. Our Global business serves clients in over 150 countries, primarily from offices in the United Kingdom, although we also serve clients from offices in the United States, Continental Europe, Asia and Australia.

The Global business is divided into:

Willis Re;

Facultative;
Faber Global;

Specialty; and

UK Insurance;
Willis Capital Markets & Advisory.Advisory; and
Risk & Analytics.

Willis Re

We are one of the world's largest intermediaries for reinsurance and have a significant market share in all of the world's major markets. Our clients are both insurance and reinsurance companies.

We operate this business on a global basis and provide a complete range of transactional capabilities, including, in conjunction with Willis Capital Markets & Advisory, a wide variety of capital markets based products.products to both insurance and reinsurance companies. Our services are underpinned by leading modeling, financial analysis and risk management advice. We bolster and enhance all of these services with the cutting edge knowledge derived from our Willis Research Network, the insurance industry's largest partnership with global academic research.

Facultative (formerly Faber Global

Global)
Our Faber GlobalFacultative unit provides facultative and wholesale solutions for property and casualty, health and specialty insurances to cedants and independent wholesaler brokers worldwide who want solutions provided through thevia US, London, European and Bermudian markets.

SpecialtyUK Insurance (formerly Specialty)

During first quarter 2014 we announced changes to the structure of ourOur UK-based insurance operations, combiningcombine our Global Specialty businesses with the Willis UK retail business to create a market leading client proposition.
This combined unit has strong global positions in Aerospace, Energy, Marine, Construction, Financial and Executive Risks as well as Financial Solutions, wholesale and facultative.

Aerospace
We are highly experienced in the provision of insurance and reinsurance brokerage and risk management services to Aerospace clients worldwide, including aircraft manufacturers, air cargo handlers and shippers, airport managers and other general aviation companies. Advisory services provided by Aerospace include claims recovery, contract and leasing risk management, safety services and market information. Aerospace's clients include approximately one third of the world's

98


About Willis Group Holdings plc


airlines. The specialist Inspace division is also prominent in serving the space industry by providing insurance and risk management services to approximately 30thirty companies.

Energy
Our Energy practice provides insurance brokerage services including property damage, offshore construction, liability and control of well and pollution insurance to the energy industry. Our Energy practice clients are worldwide. We are highly experienced in providing insurance brokerage for all aspects of the energy industry including exploration and production, refining and marketing, offshore construction and pipelines.

Marine
Our Marine unit provides marine insurance and reinsurance brokerage services, including hull, cargo and general marine liabilities. Marine's clients include ship owners, ship builders, logistics operators, port authorities, traders and shippers, other insurance intermediaries and insurance companies. Marine insurance brokerage is our oldest line of business dating back to our establishment in 1828.

Financial and Executive Risks
Our Financial and Executive Risks unit specializes in broking directors' and officers' insurance as well as professional indemnity insurance for corporations, financial institutions and professional firms.

Construction, Property and Casualty
Our Construction practice provides risk management advice and brokerage services for a wide range of UK and international construction activities. The clients of the Construction practice include contractors, project owners, project managers, project financiers, professional consultants and insurers. We are a broker for a number of the leading global construction firms. The Construction practice is now tied to Willis' specialist internal unit providing our retail colleagues' clients with access to global insurance markets, providing structuring and placing services supported by specialist knowledge and expertise across a variety of industries on a global basis in large and complex property and casualty risk exposures.

Financial Solutions
Financial Solutions is a global business unit which incorporates our Political and Credit Risk businesses, as well as Structured Finance and Project Risk Consulting teams. It also comprises specialist Trade Credit, Contingent Aviation and Mortgage teams.

Fine Art, Jewelry and Specie
The Fine Art, Jewelry and Specie unit provides specialist risk management, insurance and reinsurance services to fine art, diamond and jewelry businesses and armored car operators.

Special Contingency Risks
Special Contingency Risks specializes in people risk solutions using a combination of risk management, kidnap and ransom and personal accident services and products to meet the needs of corporations and private clients.

Hughes-Gibb
The Hughes-Gibb unit principally services the insurance and reinsurance needs of thoroughbred horse racing and horse breeding industry and of the agri-business sector, covering livestock breeders, aquaculture & agriculture industries.

UK retail operations
Our UK retail operations provide risk management, insurance brokerage and related risks services to a wide array of industry and client segments.



10


About Willis

Willis Capital Markets & Advisory

Willis Capital Markets & Advisory, with offices in New York, Hong Kong and London, provides advice to companies involved in the insurance and reinsurance industry on a broad array of mergersmerger and acquisition transactions as well as capital markets products, including acting as underwriter or agent for primary issuances, operating a secondary insurance-linked securities trading desk and engaging in general capital markets and strategic advisory work.


9


Willis Group Holdings plc


Risk & Analytics
Risk & Analytics focuses on providing analytics and other risk-based solutions to our large clients and prospects to support their risk management strategy and decisions on a global scale.

Retail operations

Our North America and International retail operations provide services to small, medium and large corporate clients, accessing Global's specialist expertise when required.

North America

Our North America business provides risk management, insurance brokerage, related risk services, and employee benefits brokerage and consulting to a wide array of industry and client segments in the United States and Canada. With around 10080 locations, organized into seven geographical regions including Canada, Willis North America locally delivers our global and national resources and specialist expertise through this retail distribution network.

In addition to being organized geographically and by specialty, our North America business focuses on four client segments: global, large national/middle-market, small commercial, and private client, with service, marketing and sales platform support for each segment.

Construction
The largest industry practice group in North America is Construction, which specializes in providing risk management, insurance brokerage, and surety bonding services to the construction industry. Willis Construction provided these services to nearly 12,00010,000 clients including approximately 20 percent of the Engineering News Record Top 400 contractors (a listing of the largest 400 North American contractors based on reported revenue). In addition, this practice group has expertise in professional liability insurance, controlled insurance programs for large projects and insurance for national homebuilders.

Human Capital
Willis Human Capital, fully integrated into the North America platform, is the Group's largest product-based practice group and provides health, welfare and human resources consulting, and brokerage services to all of our commercial client segments. This practice group's value lies in helping clients control employee benefit plan costs, reducing the amount of time human resources professionals spend administering their companies' benefit plans and educating and training employees on benefit plan issues.

Executive Risks
Another industry-leading North America practice group is Willis Executive Risks, a national team of technical professionals who specialize in meeting the directors and officers, employment practices, fiduciary liability insurance risk management, and claims advocacy needs of public and private corporations and organizations. This practice group also has expertise in professional liability, especially cyber risks.

CAPPPS
The Captive, Actuarial, Programs, Pooling, Personal Lines and Strategic Outcomes (CAPPPS) group has a network of actuaries, certified public accountants, financial analysts and pooled insurance program experts who assist clients in developing and implementing alternative risk management solutions. The program business is a leader in providing national insurance programs to niche industries including ski resorts, auto dealers, recycling, environmental, and specialty workers' compensation. Through our Loan Protector business, a specialty business acquired as part of the HRH business, this group also works with financial institutions to confirm their loans are properly insured and their interests are adequately protected.

Other industry practice groups
Other industry practice groups include Healthcare, serving the professional liability and other insurance and risk management needs of private and not-for-profit health systems, hospitals and physicians groups; Financial Institutions, serving the needs of large banks, insurers and other financial services firms; and Mergers & Acquisitions, providing due diligence, and risk management and insurance brokerage services to private equity and merchant banking firms and their portfolio companies.

11


Willis Group Holdings plc


International
Our International business comprises our operations in Western Europe, Central and Eastern Europe, Asia, Australasia, the Middle East, South Africa and Latin America.
Our offices provide services to businesses locally in nearly 120 countries around the world, making use of local expertise as well as skills, industry knowledge and expertise available elsewhere in the Group.

10


About Willis

The services provided are focused according to the characteristics of each market and vary across offices, but generally include direct risk management and insurance brokerage, specialist and reinsurance brokerage and employee benefits consulting.
As part of our on-goingongoing strategy, we continue to look for opportunities to strengthen our International market share through acquisitions and strategic investments. A list of significant subsidiaries is included in Exhibit 21.1 to this document.

We have also invested in associate companies; our significant associates at December 31, 20132014 were GS & Cie Groupe ('Gras Savoye'), a French organization (30 percent holding) and Al-Futtaim Willis Co. LLC, organized under the laws of Dubai (49 percent holding). In connection with many of our investments we retain the right to increase our ownership over time, typically to a majority or 100 percent ownership position.
We believe the combined total revenues of our International subsidiaries and associates provide an indication of the spread and capability of our International network. These operations generated approximately 30 percent of
Management structure
During the Group’s total consolidated commissionsfirst quarter 2015 we have reorganized our business from three reporting units (formerly known as Global, North America and feesInternational) into four reporting units: Willis Capital, Wholesale and Reinsurance, Willis North America, Willis International, and Willis Great Britain "Willis GB".
Willis North America and Willis International remain largely unchanged except for certain specialty teams previously included within Global are now included within the geographic regions in 2013.which they are located.
Willis Capital, Wholesale and Reinsurance includes Willis Re, Willis Capital Markets and Advisory and our wholesale businesses as well as a new unit called Willis Portfolio and Underwriting Services.
Willis GB includes our UK retail, facultative and London specialty businesses.
Customers
Our clients operate on a global and local scale in a multitude of businesses and industries throughout the world and generally range in size from major multinational corporations to middle-market companies. Further, many of our client relationships span decades, for instance our relationship with The Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company Limited dates back over 100 years. No one client accounted for more than 10 percent of revenues for fiscal year 2013.2014. Additionally, we place insurance with approximately 2,500 insurance carriers, none of which individually accounted for more than 10 percent of the total premiums we placed on behalf of our clients in 20132014.
Competition
We face competition in all fields in which we operate, based on global capability, product breadth, innovation, quality of service and price. We compete with Marsh & McLennan and Aon, the two other major providers of global risk management services, as well as with numerous specialist, regional and local firms. Competition for business is intense in all of our business lines and in every insurance market, and Marsh & McLennan and Aon have substantially greater market share than we do. Competition on premium rates has also exacerbated the pressures caused by a continuing reduction in demand in some classes of business. For example, rather than purchase additional insurance through brokers, some insureds have been retaining a greater proportion of their risk portfolios than previously. Industrial and commercial companies increasingly rely upon their own subsidiary insurance companies, known as captive insurance companies, self-insurance pools, risk retention groups, mutual insurance companies and other mechanisms for funding their risks, rather than buy insurance. Additional competitive pressures arise from the entry of new market participants, such as banks, accounting firms and insurance carriers themselves, offering risk management or transfer services.
A particular area of competitive pressure is market-derived income (MDI), which is revenue that insurance intermediaries increasingly have been obtaining from insurance carriers. Contingent commissions are one type of MDI where insurance carriers remunerate intermediates based on either the volume or profitability of risks placed with the carrier. While we have recently stated that we will apply a set of criteria to evaluate on a case-by-case basis whether we will take MDI, and in what form, to date we have not accepted contingent commissions from carriers other than in our Human Capital practice. To our knowledge, we are the only insurance broker that takes this stance. To the extent that our competitors accept volume- or profit-based continent commissions we may suffer lower revenue, reduced operating margins, and loss of market share which could materially and adversely affect our business.



1211


About Willis Group Holdings plc


Regulation
Our business activities are subject to legal requirements and governmental and quasi-governmental regulatory supervision in virtually all countries in which we operate. Also, such regulations may require individual or company licensing to conduct our business activities. While these requirements may vary from location to location they are generally designed to protect our clients by establishing minimum standards of conduct and practice, particularly regarding the provision of advice and product information as well as financial criteria. Our three most significant regulatory regions are described below:
United States
Our activities in connection with insurance brokerage services within the United States are subject to regulation and supervision by state authorities. Although the scope of regulation and form of supervision may vary from jurisdictionstate to jurisdiction,state, insurance laws in the United States are often complex and generally grant broad discretion to supervisory authorities in adopting regulations and supervising regulated activities. That supervision generally includes the licensing of insurance brokers and agents and the regulation of the handling and investment of client funds held in a fiduciary capacity. Our continuing ability to provide insurance brokerage in the jurisdictionsstates in which we currently operate is dependent upon our compliance with the rules and regulations promulgated from time to time by the regulatory authorities in each of these jurisdictions.states.
European Union
TheIn 2005, the European Union Insurance Mediation Directive introduced rules to enable insurance and reinsurance intermediaries to operate and provide services within each member state of the EUEuropean Union on a basis consistent with the EU single market and customer protection aims. Each EU member state in which we operate is required to ensure that the insurance and reinsurance intermediaries resident in their country are registered with a statutory body in that country and that each intermediary meets professional requirements in relation to their competence, good repute, professional indemnity cover and financial capacity.
United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom, our business was previouslyis regulated by the Financial Services Authority ('FSA'Conduct Auditory ('FCA'). Under legislation enacted by the UK Parliament, the regulation of our business transitioned from the FSA to the Financial Conduct Authority ('FCA') on April 1, 2013. The FCA has a wide range of rule-making, investigatory and enforcement powers, and conducts monitoring visits to assess our compliance with regulatory requirements.
The FCA has a sole strategic objective: to protect and enhance confidence in the UK financial system. Its operational objectives are to: secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers; promote efficiency and choice in the market for financial services; and protect and enhance the integrity of the UK financial system. The FCA also has a duty to act in a way that promotes competition, and to minimize the extent to which regulated businesses may be used for a purpose connected with financial crime. Finally, the FCA has new powers in product intervention. For instance, it can instruct firms to withdraw or amend misleading financial promotions.
Other
Certain of our activities are governed by other regulatory bodies, such as investment and securities licensing authorities. In the United States, our Willis Capital Markets & Advisory business operates through our wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Securities, Inc., a US-registered broker-dealer and investment advisor, member FINRA/SIPC, primarily in connection with investment banking-related services and advising on alternative risk financing transactions. Willis Capital Markets provides advice on securities or investments in the EUEuropean Union and Australia through our UK wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Capital Markets & Advisory Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the FCA. Willis Capital Markets, through our Hong Kong wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Capital Markets & Advisory (Hong Kong) Limited, is in the process of obtaining securities and advisory licenses through, and will be regulated by, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.
Our failure, or that of our employees, to satisfy the regulators that we comply with their requirements or the legal requirements governing our activities, can result in disciplinary action, fines, reputational damage and financial harm.
All companies carrying on similar activities in a given jurisdiction are subject to regulations which are not dissimilar to the requirements for our operations in the United States and United Kingdom. We do not consider that these regulatory requirements adversely affect our competitive position.
See Part I, Item 1A-Risk Factors ‘Legal and Regulatory Risks’ for discussion of how actions by regulatory authorities or changes in legislation and regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate may have an adverse effect on our business.

1312


About Willis Group Holdings plc


Employees
As of December 31, 20132014 we had approximately 18,00018,400 employees worldwide of whom approximately 3,7003,500 were employed in the United Kingdom and 6,1005,900 in the United States, with the balance being employed across the rest of the world. In addition, our associates had approximately 3,700 employees, all of whom were located outside the United Kingdom and the United States.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The executive officers of the Company as of February 20, 2015 were as follows:
Celia Brown - Ms. Brown, age 60, was appointed as an executive officer on January 23, 2012. Ms. Brown joined the Willis Group in 2010 and serves as the Willis Group Human Resources Director. Prior to joining the Willis Group, Ms. Brown spent over 20 years at XL Group plc where she held a number of senior roles. Ms. Brown served from 2006 to 2009 as the Executive Vice President, Head of Global HR and Corporate Relations at XL Group plc. Following XL Group plc, Ms. Brown formed an independent management consultancy, providing human resources services to not-for-profit, corporate and individual clients.
Dominic Casserley - Mr. Casserley, age 57, was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of Willis Group Holdings and as a member of the Board on January 7, 2013. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Casserley, was a senior partner of McKinsey & Company, which he joined in New York in 1983. During his 29 years at McKinsey, Mr. Casserley led the firm's Greater China Practice and its UK and Ireland Practice. Mr. Casserley had been a member of the McKinsey Shareholders Council, the firm's global board, since 1999 and for four years served as the Chairman of the Finance Committee of that board.
John Greene - Mr. Greene, age 49, has served as Chief Financial Officer of Willis Group Holdings since June 2, 2014. Mr. Greene joined Willis Group Holdings after more than eight years with HSBC Holdings, where he served as Chief Financial Officer for their global Retail Bank and Wealth Management business. Previously, Mr. Greene served at HSBC Holdings as Chief Financial Officer for HSBC Insurance and Chief Financial Officer for the Consumer & Mortgage Lending business. Prior to HSBC, he was with GE for twelve years in various roles, including Chief Financial Officer for GE Global Business Finance.
Stephen Hearn - Mr. Hearn, age 48, was appointed as an executive officer on January 1, 2012. Mr. Hearn joined the Willis Group in 2008 and was named Chairman and CEO of Willis Global in 2011, CEO of Willis Limited in 2012 and Group Deputy CEO in 2013. Since joining the Willis Group, Mr. Hearn has served as Chairman of Special Contingency Risk, Chairman of Willis Facultative and Chairman and CEO of Glencairn Limited. From 2009 until 2011 he led Faber & Dumas, Global Markets International and Willis Facultative. Prior to joining the Willis Group, Mr. Hearn served as Chairman and CEO of the Glencairn Group Limited and as President and CEO of Marsh Affinity Europe.
Todd Jones - Mr. Jones, age 50, was appointed as an executive officer and Chief Executive Officer of Willis North America on July 1, 2013. Mr. Jones joined Willis in 2003 as the North American Practice Leader for Willis’s Executive Risks Practice and served as the President of Willis North America from 2010 to 2013. Mr. Jones also served as a National Partner for the Northeast Region. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Jones held various leadership roles in the insurance brokerage industry. Before entering the brokerage industry, he was a financial analyst and corporate banker for a regional bank that is now part of Wells Fargo, focusing on the telecommunications industry.
David Shalders - Mr. Shalders, age 48, was appointed as an executive officer and Group Operations & Technology Director on November 4, 2013. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Shalders spent over a decade in senior operations and IT roles at the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, most recently as Global COO for Global Banking and Markets. Mr. Shalders also held roles as Head of London & Asia Operations and Head of Derivative Operations for NatWest at RBS.
Timothy D. Wright - Mr. Wright, age 53, was appointed as an executive officer in 2008 and in 2011 was appointed as CEO of Willis International. Mr. Wright served as Group Chief Operating Officer from 2008 to 2011. Prior to joining the Willis Group, he was a Partner of Bain & Company where he led their Financial Services practice in London. Mr. Wright was previously UK Managing Partner of Booz Allen & Hamilton and led their insurance work globally. He has more than 20 years of experience in the insurance and financial service industries internationally.



1413


Risk factorsWillis Group Holdings plc


Item 1A - Risk Factors
Risks Relating to our Business and the Insurance Industry
This section describes material risks affecting the Group’s business. These risks could materially affect the Group’s business, itsreputation, revenues, operating income, net income, net assets, liquidity and capital resources and ability to achieve its financial targets and, accordingly should be read in conjunction with any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Competitive Risks
Worldwide economic conditions could have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
Our business and operating results are materially affected by worldwide economic conditions. Current global economic conditions, including those associated with the ongoing Eurozone, crisis, coupled with low customer and business confidence may have a significant negative impact on the buying behavior of some of our clients as their businesses suffer from these conditions. Since 2008, many of our operations have been impacted by the weakened economic climate. A growingsignificant number of insolvencies associated with an economic downturn could adversely affect our brokerage business through the loss of clients or by hampering our ability to place insurance and reinsurance business. In addition, an increase in mergers and acquisitions can also result in the loss of clients. While it is difficult to predict the consequences of any further deterioration in global economic conditions on our business, any significant reduction or delay by our clients in purchasing insurance or making payment of premiums could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the potential for a significant insurer to fail, be downgraded or withdraw from writing certain lines of insurance coverages that we offer our clients could negatively impact overall capacity in the industry, which could then reduce the placement of certain lines and types of insurance and reduce our revenues and profitability. The potential for an insurer to fail or be downgraded could also result in errors and omissions claims by clients.
The credit and economic conditions of certain European Union countries remain fragile and may contribute to instability in the global credit and financial markets. If credit conditions worsen or financial market volatility increases in the Eurozone, it is possible that it could have a negative effect on the global economy as a whole, and our business, operating results and financial condition. If the Eurozone crisis continues or further deteriorates,to deteriorate, there will likely be a negative effect on our European business, as well as the businesses of our European clients. Further, were the Euro to be withdrawn entirely, or the Eurozone were to be dissolved as a common currency area, the legal and contractual consequences for holders of Euro-denominated obligations would be determined by laws in effect at such time. A significant devaluation of the Euro would cause the value of our financial assets that are denominated in Euros to be significantly reduced. Any of these conditions could ultimately harm our overall business, prospects, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
We may not be able to fully realize the anticipated benefits of our new growth strategy.
AtWe have stated certain goals at our 2013 Investor Conference we stated thatand our goal is, over a medium-term period of five years, to deliver mid-teens total shareholder return, deliver consistent revenue growth in the mid-single digits and target revenue growth to outpace expense growth by more than 70 basis points. We emphasized that such results could fluctuate on a quarterly basis.
outlook for 2015. In order to achieve these goals, we are implementing certain revenue growth strategies and continue to strive to manage our cost base. For example, we announced a series of actions that include, among other things, the appointments of new global industryour multi-year operational improvement program and product heads, the creation of a new Global Human Capital & Benefits Practice, a geographic realignment of the firm’s leadership team in North America and the merger of our UK retail and Global Specialty businesses.initiatives to better connect Willis. In light of the potential operational risks associated with these new initiatives, we cannot be certain whether we will be able to realize benefits from current revenue generatingrevenue-generating or cost-saving initiatives and ultimately realize our objectives. There can be no assurance that our actual results will meet these financial goals.
We do not control the premiums on which our commissions are based, and volatility or declines in premiums may seriously undermine our profitability.

We derive most of our revenues from commissions and fees for brokerage and consulting services and do not determine the insurance premiums on which our commissions are generally based. Commission levels generally follow the same trend as premium levels, as they are a percentage of the premiums paid by the insureds. Fluctuations in the premiums charged by the insurance carriers can therefore have a direct and potentially material impact on our results of operations. Due to the cyclical

15


Willis Group Holdings plc


nature of the insurance market and the impact of other market conditions on insurance premiums, commission levels may vary widely between accounting periods. A period of low or declining premium rates, generally known as a 'soft' or 'softening' market, generally leads to downward pressure on commission revenues and can have a material adverse impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. A 'hard' or 'firming' market, during which premium rates rise, generally has a

14


Risk factors

favorable impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. Rates, however, vary by geography, industry and client segment. We have been and continue to be negatively impacted by soft market conditions across certain sectors and geographic regions. In addition, insurance carriers may seek to reduce their expenses by reducing the commission rates payable to insurance agents or brokers such as ourselves. The reduction of these commission rates, along with general volatility and/or declines in premiums, may significantly undermine our profitability.
Competition in our industry is intense, and if we are unable to compete effectively, we may suffer lower revenue, reduced operating margins and lose market share which could materially and adversely affect our business.
We face competition in all fields in which we operate, based on global capability, product breadth, innovation, quality of service and price. We compete with Marsh & McLennan and Aon, the two major global providers of global risk management services, as well as with numerous specialist, regional and local firms. Competition for business is intense in all of our business lines and in every insurance market, and Marsh & McLennan and Aon have substantially greater market share than we do. Competition on premium rates has also exacerbated the pressures caused by a continuing reduction in demand in some classes of business. For example, rather than purchase additional insurance through brokers, some insureds have been retaining a greater proportion of their risk portfolios than previously. Industrial and commercial companies increasingly rely upon their own subsidiary insurance companies, known as captive insurance companies, self-insurance pools, risk retention groups, mutual insurance companies and other mechanisms for funding their risks, rather than buy insurance. Additional competitive pressures arise from the entry of non-traditional market participants, such as banks, accounting firms and insurance carriers themselves, offering risk management or transfer services. If we are unable to compete effectively, we may suffer lower revenue, reduced operating margins and lose market share which could materially and adversely affect our business.

The loss of our Chief Executive Officer or a number of our senior management or a significant number of our brokers could significantly impede our financial plans, growth, marketing and other objectives.
The loss of our Chief Executive Officer, a number of our senior management or a significant number of our brokers could significantly impede our financial plans, growth, marketing and other objectives. Our success depends to a substantial extent not only on the ability and experience of our Chief Executive Officer, Dominic Casserley, and other members of our senior management, but also on the individual brokers and teams that service our clients and maintain client relationships. The insurance and reinsurance brokerage industry has in the past experienced intense competition for the services of leading individual brokers and brokerage teams, and we have lost key individuals and teams to competitors. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our ability to attract and retain additional highly skilled and qualified personnel and to expand, train and manage our employee base. We may not continue to be successful in doing so because the competition for qualified personnel in our industry is intense.

We face certain risks associated with the acquisition or disposition of businesses and lack of control over investments in associates.
In pursuing our corporate strategy, we may acquire or dispose of or exit businesses or reorganize existing investments. For example, we have a call option to acquire 100 percent of the capital of our associate, Gras Savoye. The success of our overall acquisition and disposition strategy is dependent upon our ability to identify appropriate opportunities, negotiate transactions on favorable terms and ultimately complete such transactions. Once we complete acquisitions or reorganizations there can be no assurance that we will realize the anticipated benefits of any transaction, including revenue growth, operational efficiencies or expected synergies. For example, if we fail to recognize some or all of the strategic benefits and synergies expected from a transaction, goodwill and intangible assets may be impaired in future periods.
In addition, we may not be able to integrate acquisitions successfully into our existing business, and we could incur or assume unknown or unanticipated liabilities or contingencies, which may impact our results of operations. If we dispose of or otherwise exit certain businesses, there can be no assurance that we will not incur certain disposition related charges, or that we will be able to reduce the overheads related to the divested assets.
We also own an interest in a number of associates where we do not exercise management control and we are therefore limited in our ability to direct or manage the business to realize the anticipated benefits that we can achieve if we had full ownership.
Investment in innovative product offerings may fail to yield sufficient return to cover their investment.
From time to time, we may enter new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There arecan be substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, including the investment of significant time and resources, the possibility that these efforts will be unprofitable, and the risk of additional liabilities associated with these efforts. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business and new products

15


Willis Group Holdings plc


and services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results for operations. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business. In addition, we can provide no assurance that the entry into new lines of business or development of new products and services will be successful.
We are continually developing and investing in new and innovative offerings that we believe will address needs that we identify in the market. Nevertheless, the ability of these efforts to produce meaningful value is dependent on a number of other factors, some of which are outside of our control. For example, we have recently launched G360, a suite of facilities for our specialty insurance clients which we expect will provide faster placement and claims agreements for our clients, and promote greater price competition in the specialty insurance market. The success of G360 will depend on client participation, market reaction as well as other factors both inside and outside our control. Additionally, our Global Human Capital and Benefits Practice has invested substantial time and resources in launching The Willis Advantage under the belief that this exchange will serve a useful role to help corporations and individuals in the USUnited States manage their growing health care expenses. But in order for The

16


Risk factors

Willis Advantage to be successful, health care insurers and corporate and individual participants must deem it suitable to participate in, and such decisions are based on their own particular circumstances.
Our business performance and growth plans could be negatively affected if we are not able to effectively apply technology to drive value for our clients through technology-based solutions or gain internal efficiencies through the effective application of technology and related tools.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to develop and implement technology solutions that anticipate and keep pace with rapid and continuing changes in technology, industry standards and client preferences. We may not be successful in anticipating or responding to these developments in a timely and cost-effective manner, and our ideas may not be accepted in the marketplace. Additionally, the effort to gain technological expertise and develop new technologies in our business requires us to incur significant expenses.cost. Our competitors are seeking to develop competing technologies, and their success in this space may impact our ability to differentiate our services to our clients through the use of unique technological solutions. If we cannot offer new technologies as quickly as our competitors or if our competitors develop more cost-effective technologies, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to obtain and complete client engagements.

Legal and Regulatory Risks
Our compliance systems and controls cannot guarantee that we comply with all applicable federal and state or foreign laws and regulations, and actions by regulatory authorities or changes in applicable laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate may have an adverse effect on our business.business.
Our activities are subject to extensive regulation under the laws of the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and its member states, and the other jurisdictions around the world in which we operate. Indeed, overIn addition, we own an interest in a number of associates where we do not exercise management control. Over the last few years, there has been a substantial increaseregulators across the world are increasingly seeking to regulate brokers who operate in focus on and developments in these laws and regulations.their jurisdictions. Compliance with laws and regulations that apply to our operations is complex and may increaseincreases our cost of doing business. These laws and regulations include insurance and financial industry regulations, economic and trade sanctions and laws against financial crimes, including client money and moneyanti-money laundering, bribery or other corruption, such as the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, anti-competition and other anti-competitive regulations.data privacy legislation. In most jurisdictions, governmental and regulatory authorities have the ability to interpret and amend these laws and regulations and impose penalties for non-compliance, including sanctions, civil remedies, monetary fines, injunctions, revocation of licenses or approvals, suspension of individuals, limitations on business activities or redress to clients. While we believe that we currentlyhave substantially increased our focus on the geographic breadth of regulations to which we are subject, maintain good relationships with our key regulators and that our current systems and controls are adequate, and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, we cannot assure that such systems and controls will prevent any violations of any applicable laws and regulations.
Our business, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity may be materially adversely affected by actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and proceedings.
We are subject to various actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and other proceedings relating principally to alleged errors and omissions in connection with the placement of insurance and reinsurance in the ordinary course of business. Because we often assist our clients with matters, including the placement of insurance coverage and the handling of related claims, involving substantial amounts of money, errors and omissions claims against us may arise which allege our potential liability for all or part of the amounts in question.
Claimants can seek large damage awards and these claims can involve potentially significant defense costs. Such claims, lawsuits and other proceedings could, for example, include allegations of damages for our employees or sub-agents improperly failing to place coverage or notify claims on behalf of clients, to provide insurance carriers with complete and accurate information relating to the risks being insured or to appropriately apply funds that we hold for our clients on a fiduciary basis.

16


Risk factors

Errors and omissions claims, lawsuits and other proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business are covered in part by professional indemnity or other appropriate insurance. The terms of this insurance vary by policy year and self-insured risks have increased significantly in recent years. In respect of self-insured risks, we have established provisions against these items which we believe to be adequate in the light of current information and legal advice, and we adjust such provisions from time to time according to developments. Our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity may be adversely affected if in the future our insurance coverage proves to be inadequate or unavailable or there is an increase in liabilities for which we self-insure. Our ability to obtain professional indemnity insurance in the amounts and with the deductibles we desire in the future may be adversely impacted by general developments in the market for such insurance or our own claims experience.
We are also subject to actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and proceedings outside of errors and omissions claims. An example of material claims for which we are subject that are outside of the error and omissions claims context relate

17


Willis Group Holdings plc


to those arising out of the collapse of The Stanford Financial Group, for which we acted as brokers of record on certain lines of insurance.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be ascertained and liabilities in indeterminate amounts may be imposed on us. It is thus possible that future results of operations or cash flows for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by an unfavorable resolution of these matters. In addition, these matters continue to divert management and personnel resources away from operating our business. Even if we do not experience significant monetary costs, there may also be adverse publicity associated with these matters that could result in reputational harm to the insurance brokerage industry in general or to us in particular that may adversely affect our business, client or employee relationships.
Accepting market derived income (MDI) may cause regulatory or other scrutiny, which may have a material and adverse effect on our business, and our position on contingent commissions may put us at a competitive disadvantage.business.
Insurance intermediaries have traditionally been remunerated by commission or fees paid by clients. Intermediaries also obtain revenue from insurance carriers. This is commonly known as market derived income or 'MDI'. MDI takes a variety of forms, including volume- or profit-based contingent commissions, facilities administration charges, business development agreements, and fees for providing certain data to carriers. We have recently stated that we will apply a set of criteria to evaluate on a case-by-case basis whether we will take MDI, and in what form. 
MDI creates various risks. Intermediaries have a duty to act in the best interests of their clients and payments from carriers can incentivize intermediaries to put carriers’ interests ahead of their clients. Accordingly, MDI may be subject to scrutiny by various regulators under conflict of interest, anti-trust, unfair competition, and anti-bribery laws and regulations. While accepting MDI is a lawful and acceptable business practice, and while we will comply with all applicable lawshave established systems and regulations,controls to manage these risks, we cannot predict whether our position will causeresult in regulatory or other scrutiny.
Additionally, as noted above, contingent commissions are a form of MDI. Over the past five years, other than in our Human Capital practice, we have not accepted contingent commissions from carriers. To our knowledge, we are the only insurance broker that takes this stance. If we continue to not accept contingents and our competitors accept volume- or profit-based continent commissions we may suffer lower revenue, reduced operating margins, and loss of market share which could materially and adversely affect our business.
IT and Operational Risks
Data security breaches or improper disclosure of confidential company or personal data could result in material financial loss, loss of human capital, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
Computer viruses, hackers and other external hazards, as well as improper or inadvertent staff behavior could expose confidential company and personal data systems to security breaches. Additionally, one of our significant responsibilities is to maintain the security and privacy of our clients’ confidential and proprietary information and the personal data of their employees. These increased risks, and expanding regulatory requirements regarding data security, could expose us to data loss, monetary and reputational damages and significant increases in compliance costs.
With respect to our commercial arrangements with third-party vendors, we have processes designed to require third-party IT outsourcing, offsite storage and other vendors to agree to maintain certain standards with respect to the storage, protection and transfer of confidential, personal and proprietary information. However, we remain at risk of a data breach due to the intentional or unintentional non-compliance by a vendor’s employee or agent, the breakdown of a vendor’s data protection processes, or a cyber-attack on a vendor’s information systems.
We have experienced a number of data incidents, resulting from human error as well as attempts at unauthorized access to our systems, which to date have not had a material impact on our business, operations or clients.
We maintain policies, procedures and technological safeguards designed to protect the security and privacy of this information. However, we cannot entirely eliminate the risk of data security breaches, improper access to or disclosure of confidential company or personally identifiable information. Our technology may fail to adequately secure the private information we hold and protect it from theft, computer viruses, hackers or inadvertent loss. In such circumstances, we may be held liable to our clients, which could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue.

17


Willis Group Holdings plc


Further, data privacy, information security, identity theft, and related computer and internet issues are matters of growing public concern and are subject to frequently changing rules and regulations. Our failure to adhere to or successfully implement processes in response to changing regulatory requirements and customer expectations in this area could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation.
Interruption to or loss of our information processing capabilities or failure to effectively maintain and upgrade our information processing hardware or systems could cause material financial loss, loss of human resources, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
Our business depends significantly on effective information systems. Our capacity to service our clients relies on effective storage, retrieval, processing and management of information. Our information systems also rely on the commitment of significant resources to maintain and enhance existing systems, develop and create new systems and products in order to keep pace with continuing changes in information processing technology or evolving industry and regulatory standards and to be at the forefront of a range of technology relevant to our business.
If the informationdata we rely on to run our business were found to be inaccurate or unreliable or if we fail to maintain effective and efficient systems (including through a telecommunications failure, failure to replace or update redundant or obsolete computer hardware, applications or software systems or if we experience other disruptions), this could result in material financial loss, regulatory action, reputational harm or legal liability.

18


Risk factors

Our inability to successfully recover should we experience a natural disaster or other significant disruption to business continuity could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Our ability to conduct business may be adversely affected, even in the short-term, by a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our business and the communities where we are located. This may include a disruption caused by restricted physical site access, terrorist activities, disease pandemics, or outages to electrical, communications or other services used by our company, our employees or third parties with whom we conduct business. Although we have certainbusiness continuity and disaster recovery procedures in place and insurance to protect against such contingencies, such procedures may not be entirely effective and any insurance or recovery procedures may not continue to be available at reasonable prices and may not address all such losses or compensate us for the possible loss of clients occurring during any period that we are unable to provide services. Our inability to successfully recover should we experience a natural disaster or other significant disruption to business continuity could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Data security breaches or improper disclosure of confidential company or personal data could result in material financial loss, loss of human capital, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
Computer viruses, hackers and other external hazards could expose confidential company and personal data systems to security breaches. Additionally, oneCertain of our significant responsibilities is to maintain the security and privacy of our clients’ confidential and proprietary information and the personal data of their employees. These increased risks, and expanding regulatory requirements regarding data security, could expose us to data loss, monetary and reputational damages and significant increases in compliance costs.
We maintain policies, procedures and technological safeguards designed to protect the security and privacy of this information in our database. However, we cannot entirely eliminate the risk of data security breaches, improper access to or disclosure of confidential company or personally identifiable information. Our technology may fail to adequately secure the private information we maintain in our databases and protect it from theft, computer viruses, hackers or inadvertent loss. In such circumstances, we may be held liable to our clients, which could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue. Further database privacy, identity theft, and related computer and internet issues are matters of growing public concern and are subject to frequently changing rules and regulations. Our failure to adhere to or successfully implement processes in response to changing regulatory requirements in this area could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation in the marketplace.
Our non-core operations, such as our Willis Capital Markets & Advisory business,businesses pose certain underwriting, advisory or reputational risks and can have a significant adverse impact on our financial results.
We provide a broad range of brokerage, reinsurance and risk management consulting services to our clients worldwide. We also engage in certain non-core operations. For example,In addition, our Willis Capital Markets & Advisory business provides advice to insurance and reinsurance companies on a broad array of mergersmerger and acquisition transactions as well as capital markets products, including acting as underwriter or agent for primary issuances, operating a secondary insurance-linked securities trading desk and engaging in general capital markets and strategic advisory work. These operations may pose certain underwriting, advisory or reputational risks to our core business.
In addition, these non-core operations, although not material to the Group as a whole may, in any period, have a material effect on our results of operations. For example, our Willis Capital Markets & Advisory business is transaction-based which can cause results to differ from period-to-period. In another example, our financial results in 2011 and first two quarters of 2012 were adversely impacted by the significant deterioration of the financial results of our Loan Protector business driven by the loss of clients through attrition and M&A activity, industry-wide commission pressures and a slowdown in foreclosures.
Financial Risks
Our outstanding debt could adversely affect our cash flows and financial flexibility.flexibility.
We had total consolidated debt outstanding of approximately $2.3 billion as of December 31, 20132014 and our 20132014 interest expense was $126$135 million. Although management believes that our cash flows will be sufficient to service this debt, there may be circumstances in which required payments of principal and/or interest on this debt could adversely affect our cash flows and this level of indebtedness may:
require us to dedicate a significant portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, thereby reducing the availability of cash flow to fund capital expenditures, to pursue other acquisitions or investments, in new technologies, to pay dividends and for general corporate purposes;

19


Willis Group Holdings plc


increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic conditions, including if we borrow at variable interest rates, which makes us vulnerable to increases in interest rates generally;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes or challenges relating to our business and industry; and
put us at a competitive disadvantage against competitors who have less indebtedness or are in a more favorable

18


Risk factors

position to access additional capital resources.
The terms of our current financings also include certain limitations. For example, the agreements relating to the debt arrangements and credit facilities contain numerous operating and financial covenants, including requirements to maintain minimum ratios of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated cash interest expense and maximum levels of consolidated funded indebtedness in relation to consolidated EBITDA, in each case subject to certain adjustments.
A failure to comply with the restrictions under our credit facilities and outstanding notes could result in a default under the financing obligations or could require us to obtain waivers from our lenders for failure to comply with these restrictions. The occurrence of a default that remains uncured or the inability to secure a necessary consent or waiver could cause our obligations with respect to our debt to be accelerated and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our pension liabilities may increase which could require us to make additional cash contributions to our pension plans reducing the cash available for other uses.uses.
We have two principal defined benefit plans: one in the United Kingdom and the other in the United States, and in addition, we have several smaller defined benefit pension plans in certain other countries in which we operate. Total cash contributions to these defined benefit pension plans in 2013 were $150 million, including employees' salary sacrifice contributions. In 2014, the Company expects to make cash contributions of approximately $134 million, including employees' salary sacrifice contributions, to these pension plans, although we may elect to contribute more. Future estimates are based on certain assumptions, including discount rates, interest rates, mortality, fair value of assets and expected return on plan assets.
In 2012, we agreed a revised funding strategy with the UK plan's trustee under which we are committed to make additional cash contributions in the event that our adjusted EBITDA exceeds certain thresholds, or we make exceptional returns for our shareholders, including share buybacks or special dividends. As a result, we may be committed to make additional contributions through to 2017 based on the prior year's performance. In addition, during 2014During 2015, we will be required to negotiate a new funding arrangement with the UK pension trustee, which may further change the contributions we are required to make during 20142015 and beyond.
Total cash contributions, excluding employees’ salary sacrifice contributions, to these defined benefit pension plans in 2014 were $112 million. In 2015, the Company currently expects to make cash contributions of approximately $116 million, including exceptional returns, to these pension plans, although we may elect to contribute more. Future estimates are based on certain assumptions, including discount rates, interest rates, mortality, fair value of assets and expected return on plan assets.
We have taken actions to manage our pension liabilities, including closing our UK and US plans to new participants and restricting final pensionable salaries. Future benefit accruals in the US pension plan were also stopped, or frozen, on May 15, 2009. Nevertheless, the determination of pension expense and pension funding is based on a variety of rules and regulations. Changes in these rules and regulations could impact the calculation of pension plan liabilities and the valuation of pension plan assets. They may also result in higher pension costs, additional financial statement disclosure, and accelerate and increase the need to fully fund our pension plans through increased cash contributions. Further, a significant decline in the value of investments that fund our pension plan, if not offset or mitigated by a decline in our liabilities, may significantly alter the values and actuarial assumptions used to calculate our future pension expense and we could be required to fund our plan with significant additional amounts of cash. In addition to the critical assumptions described above, our plans use certain assumptions about the life expectancy of plan participants and surviving spouses. Periodic revision of those assumptions can materially change the present value of future benefits and therefore the funded status of the plans and the resulting periodic pension expense. Changes in our pension benefit obligations, the related net periodic costs or credits, and the required level of future cash contributions, may occur in the future due to any variance of actual results from our assumptions and changes in the number of participating employees. The need to make additional cash contributions may reduce our financial flexibility and increase liquidity risk by reducing the cash available to meet our other obligations, including the payment obligations under our credit facilities and other long-term debt, or other needs of our business.
We could incur substantial losses, including with respect to our own cash and fiduciary cash held on behalf of insurance companies and clients, if one of the financial institutions we use in our operations failed.
The deterioration of the global credit and financial markets has created challenging conditions for financial institutions, including depositories and the financial strength of these institutions may continue to decline. We maintain significant cash balances at various US depository institutions that are significantly in excess of the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. We also maintain significant cash balances in foreign financial institutions. A significant portion of this cash is fiduciary cash is held on behalf of insurance companies or clients. If one or more of the institutions in which we maintain

20


Risk factors

significant cash balances were to fail, our ability to access these funds might be temporarily or permanently limited, and we could face a material liquidity problem and potentially material financial losses. We couldwould also be liable to claims made by the insurance companies or our clients regarding the fiduciary cash held on their behalf.



19


Willis Group Holdings plc


A downgrade to our corporate credit rating and the credit ratings of our outstanding debt may adversely affect our borrowing costs and financial flexibility and, under certain circumstances, may require us to offer to buy back some of our outstanding debt.
A downgrade in our corporate credit rating or the credit ratings of our debt would increase our borrowing costs including those under our credit facilities, and reduce our financial flexibility. In addition, certain downgrades would trigger a step-up in interest rates under the indentures for our 6.200% senior notes due 2017 and our 7.000% senior notes due 2019,, which would increase our interest expense. If we need to raise capital in the future, any credit rating downgrade could negatively affect our financing costs or access to financing sources. This may in turn impact the assumptions when performing our goodwill impairment testing which may reduce the excess of fair value over carrying value of the reporting units.
In addition, under the indenture for our 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and our 6.125% senior notes due 2043, if we experience a ratings decline together with a change of control event, we would be required to offer to purchase our 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and our 6.125% senior notes due 2043 from holders unless we had previously redeemed those notes. We may not have sufficient funds available or access to funding to repurchase tendered notes in that event, which could result in a default under the notes. Any future debt that we incur may contain covenants regarding repurchases in the event of a change of control triggering event.
We face certain risks associated with the acquisition or disposition of businesses and lack of control over investments in associates.
In pursuing our corporate strategy, we may acquire or dispose of or exit businesses or reorganize existing investments. For example, we have a call option to acquire 100 percent of the capital of Gras Savoye. The success of our overall acquisition and disposition strategy is dependent upon our ability to identify appropriate opportunities, negotiate transactions on favorable terms and ultimately complete such transactions. Once we complete acquisitions or reorganizations there can be no assurance that we will realize the anticipated benefits of any transaction, including revenue growth, operational efficiencies or expected synergies. For example, if we fail to recognize some or all of the strategic benefits and synergies expected from a transaction, goodwill and intangible assets may be impaired in future periods.
In addition, we may not be able to integrate acquisitions successfully into our existing business, and we could incur or assume unknown or unanticipated liabilities or contingencies, which may impact our results of operations. If we dispose of or otherwise exit certain businesses, there can be no assurance that we will not incur certain disposition related charges, or that we will be able to reduce overheads related to the divested assets.
We also own an interest in a number of associates, such as Gras Savoye, where we do not exercise management control and we are therefore unable to direct or manage the business to realize the anticipated benefits that we can achieve through full integration.
If our goodwill becomes impaired, we may be required to record significant charges to earnings.
We have a substantial amount of goodwill on our balance sheet as a result of acquisitions we have completed. We review goodwill for impairment annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred.
Our annual goodwill impairment analysis is performed each year at October 1. In fiscal year 2012, we recognized an impairment charge of $492 million in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in relation to our North American business. At October 1, 2013, our analysis showed that the estimated fair values of each of our reporting units were in excess of the carrying values and therefore did not result in any impairment charge in 2013.
Application of the impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assignment of assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting units and determination of fair value of each reporting unit. Notwithstanding the fact that we recognized an impairment charge in fiscal year 2012 for our North American reporting unit, the risk remains that a significant deterioration in a key estimate or assumption or a less significant deterioration to a combination of assumptions or the sale of a part of a reporting unit could result in an impairment charge in the future, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings.

21


Willis Group Holdings plc


For further information on our testing for goodwill impairment, see ‘Critical Accounting Estimates’ under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We are a holding company and, therefore, may not be able to receive dividends or other distributions in needed amounts from our subsidiaries.
Willis Group Holdings is organized as a holding company that conducts no business of its own. We are dependent upon dividends and other payments from our operating subsidiaries to meet our obligations for paying principal and interest on outstanding debt obligations, for paying dividends to shareholders and for corporate expenses. Legal and regulatory restrictions, foreign exchange controls, as well as operating requirements of our subsidiaries, may limit our ability to obtain cash from these subsidiaries. For example, Willis Limited, our UK brokerage subsidiary regulated by the FCA, is currently required to maintain $126 million in unencumbered and available funds, of which at least $79 million must be in cash, for regulatory purposes. In the event our operating subsidiaries are unable to pay dividends and make other payments to Willis Group Holdings, we may not be able to service debt, pay obligations or pay dividends on ordinary shares.
If our goodwill becomes impaired, we may be required to record significant charges to earnings, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings.
We have a substantial amount of goodwill on our balance sheet as a result of acquisitions we have completed. We review goodwill for impairment annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. Application of the impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assignment of assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting units and determination of fair value of each reporting unit. Notwithstanding the fact that we recognized an impairment charge in fiscal year 2012 for our North American reporting unit, the risk remains that a significant deterioration in a key estimate or assumption or a less significant deterioration to a combination of assumptions or the sale of a part of a reporting unit could result in an impairment charge in the future, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings.
For further information on our testing for goodwill impairment, see ‘Critical Accounting Estimates’ under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
International RisksNorth America

Our significant non-US operations, particularly our London market operations, expose usNorth America business provides risk management, insurance brokerage, related risk services, and employee benefits brokerage and consulting to exchange rate fluctuations and various risks that could impact our business.
A significant portion of our operations is conducted outside the United States. Accordingly, we are subject to legal, economic and market risks associated with operating in foreign countries, including devaluations and fluctuations in currency exchange rates; imposition of limitations on conversion of foreign currencies into pounds sterling or dollars or remittance of dividends and other payments by foreign subsidiaries; hyperinflation in certain foreign countries; imposition or increase of investment and other restrictions by foreign governments; and the requirement of complying with a wide varietyarray of foreign laws.
We report our operating resultsindustry and financial conditionclient segments in US dollars. Our US operations earn revenue and incur expenses primarily in US dollars. In our London market operations, however, we earn revenue in a number of different currencies, but expenses are almost entirely incurred in pounds sterling. Outside the United States and Canada. With around 80 locations, organized into seven geographical regions including Canada, Willis North America locally delivers our London market operations, we predominantly generate revenueglobal and expenses in the local currency. The table gives an approximate analysis of revenuesnational resources and expensesspecialist expertise through this retail distribution network.

In addition to being organized geographically and by currency in 2013.specialty, our North America business focuses on four client segments: global, large national/middle-market, small commercial, and private client, with service, marketing and sales platform support for each segment.

Construction
 
US
Dollars
 
Pounds
Sterling
 Euros 
Other
currencies
Revenues60% 8% 13% 19%
Expenses49% 25% 9% 17%
The largest industry practice group in North America is Construction, which specializes in providing risk management, insurance brokerage, and surety bonding services to the construction industry. Willis Construction provided these services to nearly 10,000 clients including approximately 20 percent of the Engineering News Record Top 400 contractors (a listing of the largest 400 North American contractors based on reported revenue). In addition, this practice group has expertise in professional liability insurance, controlled insurance programs for large projects and insurance for national homebuilders.
Because
Human Capital
Willis Human Capital, fully integrated into the North America platform, is the Group's largest product-based practice group and provides health, welfare and human resources consulting, and brokerage services to all of devaluationsour commercial client segments. This practice group's value lies in helping clients control employee benefit plan costs, reducing the amount of time human resources professionals spend administering their companies' benefit plans and fluctuationseducating and training employees on benefit plan issues.

Executive Risks
Another industry-leading North America practice group is Willis Executive Risks, a national team of technical professionals who specialize in currency exchange rates ormeeting the impositiondirectors and officers, employment practices, fiduciary liability insurance risk management, and claims advocacy needs of limitations on conversionpublic and private corporations and organizations. This practice group also has expertise in professional liability, especially cyber risks.

Other industry practice groups
Other industry practice groups include Healthcare, serving the professional liability and other insurance and risk management needs of foreign currencies into US dollars, we are subjectprivate and not-for-profit health systems, hospitals and physicians groups; Financial Institutions, serving the needs of large banks, insurers and other financial services firms; and Mergers & Acquisitions, providing due diligence, and risk management and insurance brokerage services to currency translation exposure on the profits ofprivate equity and merchant banking firms and their portfolio companies.

International
Our International business comprises our operations in additionWestern Europe, Central and Eastern Europe, Asia, Australasia, the Middle East, South Africa and Latin America.
Our offices provide services to economic exposure. Furthermore,businesses locally in nearly 120 countries around the mismatch between pounds sterling revenuesworld, making use of local expertise as well as skills, industry knowledge and expenses, together with any net sterling balance sheet position we holdexpertise available elsewhere in our US dollar denominated London market operations, creates an exchange exposure.the Group.

10

For example, as the pound sterling strengthens, the US dollars required to be translated into pounds sterling to cover the net sterling expenses increase, which then causes our results to be negatively impacted. However, any net sterling asset we
About Willis

The services provided are holding will be more valuable when translated into US dollars. Given these facts, the strength of the pound sterling relativefocused according to the US dollar has in the past had a material negative impact on our reported results. Thischaracteristics of each market and vary across offices, but generally include direct risk could have a material adverse effect on our business financial condition, cash flowmanagement and results of operations in the future.insurance brokerage, specialist and reinsurance brokerage and employee benefits consulting.
Where needed, we deploy a hedging strategy to mitigateAs part of our operating exposureongoing strategy, we continue to exchange rate movements, but such mitigating attempts may not be successful. For more informationlook for opportunities to strengthen our International market share through acquisitions and strategic investments. A list of significant subsidiaries is included in Exhibit 21.1 to this document.

We have also invested in associate companies; our significant associates at December 31, 2014 were GS & Cie Groupe ('Gras Savoye'), a French organization (30 percent holding) and Al-Futtaim Willis Co. LLC, organized under the laws of Dubai (49 percent holding). In connection with many of our investments we retain the right to increase our ownership over time, typically to a majority or 100 percent ownership position.
We believe the combined total revenues of our International subsidiaries and associates provide an indication of the spread and capability of our International network.
Management structure
During the first quarter 2015 we have reorganized our business from three reporting units (formerly known as Global, North America and International) into four reporting units: Willis Capital, Wholesale and Reinsurance, Willis North America, Willis International, and Willis Great Britain "Willis GB".
Willis North America and Willis International remain largely unchanged except for certain specialty teams previously included within Global are now included within the geographic regions in which they are located.
Willis Capital, Wholesale and Reinsurance includes Willis Re, Willis Capital Markets and Advisory and our wholesale businesses as well as a new unit called Willis Portfolio and Underwriting Services.
Willis GB includes our UK retail, facultative and London specialty businesses.
Customers
Our clients operate on this strategy, see Part II Item 8 - 'Note 26 Derivative Financial Instrumentsa global and Hedging Activities'.
In conducting our businesses around the world, we are subject to political, economic, legal, market, nationalization, operational and other risks that are inherentlocal scale in operating in many countries.
In conducting oura multitude of businesses and maintaining and supporting our global operations, we are subject to political, economic, legal, market, nationalization, operational and other risks. Our businesses and operations continue to expand into new regionsindustries throughout the world including emerging markets.and generally range in size from major multinational corporations to middle-market companies. Further, many of our client relationships span decades, for instance our relationship with The possible effectsTokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company Limited dates back over 100 years. No one client accounted for more than 10 percent of economicrevenues for fiscal year 2014. Additionally, we place insurance with approximately 2,500 insurance carriers, none of which individually accounted for more than 10 percent of the total premiums we placed on behalf of our clients in 2014.
Competition
We face competition in all fields in which we operate, based on global capability, product breadth, innovation, quality of service and financial disruptions throughoutprice. We compete with Marsh & McLennan and Aon, the world couldtwo other major providers of global risk management services, as well as with numerous specialist, regional and local firms. Competition for business is intense in all of our business lines and in every insurance market, and Marsh & McLennan and Aon have an adverse impactsubstantially greater market share than we do. Competition on our businesses. Thesepremium rates has also exacerbated the pressures caused by a continuing reduction in demand in some classes of business. For example, rather than purchase additional insurance through brokers, some insureds have been retaining a greater proportion of their risk portfolios than previously. Industrial and commercial companies increasingly rely upon their own subsidiary insurance companies, known as captive insurance companies, self-insurance pools, risk retention groups, mutual insurance companies and other mechanisms for funding their risks, include:rather than buy insurance. Additional competitive pressures arise from the entry of new market participants, such as banks, accounting firms and insurance carriers themselves, offering risk management or transfer services.
the general economic and political conditions in foreign countries;

2211


Risk factorsWillis Group Holdings plc


the imposition of controls or limitations on the conversion of foreign currencies or remittance of dividendsRegulation
Our business activities are subject to legal requirements and other payments by foreign subsidiaries;
imposition of withholdinggovernmental and other taxes on remittances and other payments from subsidiaries;
imposition or increase of investment and other restrictions by foreign governments;
fluctuationsquasi-governmental regulatory supervision in our effective tax rate;
difficulties in controlling operations and monitoring employees in geographically dispersed and culturally diverse locations; 
the potential costs and difficulties in complying, or monitoring compliance, with a wide variety of foreign laws (some of which may conflict with US or other sources of law), laws and regulations applicable to insurance brokers and US business operations abroad, including rules relating to the conduct of business, trade sanctions administered by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control, the EU, the UK and the UN, and the requirements of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as well as other anti-bribery and corruption rules and requirements in theall countries in which we operate;operate. Also, such regulations may require individual or company licensing to conduct our business activities. While these requirements may vary from location to location they are generally designed to protect our clients by establishing minimum standards of conduct and practice, particularly regarding the provision of advice and product information as well as financial criteria. Our three most significant regulatory regions are described below:
United States
Our activities in connection with insurance brokerage services within the potential costsUnited States are subject to regulation and difficultiessupervision by state authorities. Although the scope of regulation and form of supervision may vary from state to state, insurance laws in complyingthe United States are often complex and generally grant broad discretion to supervisory authorities in adopting regulations and supervising regulated activities. That supervision generally includes the licensing of insurance brokers and agents and the regulation of the handling and investment of client funds held in a fiduciary capacity. Our continuing ability to provide insurance brokerage in the states in which we currently operate is dependent upon our compliance with local regulationthe rules and regulations promulgated from time to time by the regulatory authorities in each of these states.
European Union
In 2005, the European Union Insurance Mediation Directive introduced rules to enable insurance and reinsurance intermediaries to operate and provide services within each member state of the European Union on a basis consistent with the EU single market and customer protection aims. Each EU member state in which we operate is required to ensure that the insurance and reinsurance intermediaries resident in their country are registered with a statutory body in that country and that each intermediary meets professional requirements in relation to their competence, good repute, professional indemnity cover and financial capacity.
United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom, our business is regulated by the Financial Conduct Auditory ('FCA'). The FCA has a wide range of rule-making, investigatory and enforcement powers, and conducts monitoring visits to assess our compliance with regulatory requirements.
The FCA has a sole strategic objective: to protect and enhance confidence in the UK financial system. Its operational objectives are to: secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers; promote efficiency and choice in the market for financial services; and protect and enhance the integrity of the UK financial system. The FCA also has a duty to act in a way that promotes competition, and to minimize the extent to which regulated businesses may be used for a purpose connected with financial crime. Finally, the FCA has new powers in product intervention. For instance, it can instruct firms to withdraw or amend misleading financial promotions.
Other
Certain of our activities are governed by other regulatory bodies, such as investment and securities licensing authorities. In the United States, our Willis Capital Markets & Advisory business operates through our wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Securities, Inc., a US-registered broker-dealer and member FINRA/SIPC, primarily in connection with investment banking-related services and advising on alternative risk financing transactions. Willis Capital Markets provides advice on securities or investments in the European Union and Australia through our UK wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Capital Markets & Advisory Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the FCA. Willis Capital Markets, through our Hong Kong wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Capital Markets & Advisory (Hong Kong) Limited, is in the process of obtaining securities and advisory licenses through, and will be regulated by, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.
Our failure, or that of our employees, to satisfy the regulators that we comply with their requirements or the legal requirements governing our activities, can result in disciplinary action, fines, reputational damage and financial harm.
All companies carrying on similar activities in a given jurisdiction are subject to regulations which are not dissimilar to the requirements for our operating subsidiaries across the globe.
Legislative and regulatory action could materially and adversely affect us and our effective tax rate may increase.
There is uncertainty regarding the tax policies of the jurisdictions where we operate (which include the potential legislative actions described below), and our effective tax rate may increase and any such increase may be material. Additionally, the tax laws of Ireland and other jurisdictions could change in the future, and such changes could cause a material change in our effective tax rate. For example, legislative action may be taken by the US Congress which, if ultimately enacted, could override tax treaties upon which we rely or could broaden the circumstances under which we would be considered a US resident, each of which could materially and adversely affect our effective tax rate and cash tax position. We cannot predict the outcome of any specific legislative proposals. However, if proposals were enacted that had the effect of limiting our ability to take advantage of tax treaties between Ireland and other jurisdictions (including the US), we could be subjected to increased taxation. In addition, any future amendments to the current income tax treaties between Ireland and other jurisdictions could subject us to increased taxation.
Irish law differs from the laws in effectoperations in the United States and United Kingdom. We do not consider that these regulatory requirements adversely affect our competitive position.
See Part I, Item 1A-Risk Factors ‘Legal and Regulatory Risks’ for discussion of how actions by regulatory authorities or changes in legislation and regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate may afford less protection to holdershave an adverse effect on our business.

12


About Willis

Employees
As of our securities.
It may not be possible to enforce court judgments obtainedDecember 31, 2014 we had approximately 18,400 employees worldwide of whom approximately 3,500 were employed in the United Kingdom and 5,900 in the United States, against us in Ireland based onwith the civil liability provisionsbalance being employed across the rest of the US federal or state securities laws.world. In addition, there is some uncertainty as to whetherour associates had approximately 3,700 employees, all of whom were located outside the courts of Ireland would recognize or enforce judgments of US courts obtained against us or our directors or officers based onUnited Kingdom and the civil liabilities provisionsUnited States.
Executive Officers of the US federal or state securities laws or hear actions against us or those persons based on those laws. We have been advised that the United States currently does not have a treaty with Ireland providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. Therefore, a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any US federal or state court based on civil liability, whether or not based solely on US federal or state securities laws, would not be directly enforceable in Ireland. While not directly enforceable, it is possible for a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any US federal or state court based on civil liability to be enforced in Ireland through common law rules. However, this process is subject to numerous established principles and would involve the commencement of a new set of proceedings in Ireland to enforce the judgment.Registrant
As an Irish company, Willis Group Holdings is governed by the Irish Companies Acts, which differ in some material respects from laws generally applicable to US corporations and shareholders, including, among others, differences relating to interested director and officer transactions and shareholder lawsuits. Likewise, the duties of directors and officers of an Irish company generally are owed to the company only. Shareholders of Irish companies generally do not have a personal right of action against directors orThe executive officers of the companyCompany as of February 20, 2015 were as follows:
Celia Brown - Ms. Brown, age 60, was appointed as an executive officer on January 23, 2012. Ms. Brown joined the Willis Group in 2010 and may exercise such rightsserves as the Willis Group Human Resources Director. Prior to joining the Willis Group, Ms. Brown spent over 20 years at XL Group plc where she held a number of action on behalfsenior roles. Ms. Brown served from 2006 to 2009 as the Executive Vice President, Head of the Company only in limited circumstances. Accordingly, holdersGlobal HR and Corporate Relations at XL Group plc. Following XL Group plc, Ms. Brown formed an independent management consultancy, providing human resources services to not-for-profit, corporate and individual clients.
Dominic Casserley - Mr. Casserley, age 57, was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of Willis Group Holdings securities may have more difficulty protecting their interests than would holders of securities ofand as a corporation incorporated in a jurisdictionmember of the United States.Board on January 7, 2013. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Casserley, was a senior partner of McKinsey & Company, which he joined in New York in 1983. During his 29 years at McKinsey, Mr. Casserley led the firm's Greater China Practice and its UK and Ireland Practice. Mr. Casserley had been a member of the McKinsey Shareholders Council, the firm's global board, since 1999 and for four years served as the Chairman of the Finance Committee of that board.
John Greene - Mr. Greene, age 49, has served as Chief Financial Officer of Willis Group Holdings since June 2, 2014. Mr. Greene joined Willis Group Holdings after more than eight years with HSBC Holdings, where he served as Chief Financial Officer for their global Retail Bank and Wealth Management business. Previously, Mr. Greene served at HSBC Holdings as Chief Financial Officer for HSBC Insurance and Chief Financial Officer for the Consumer & Mortgage Lending business. Prior to HSBC, he was with GE for twelve years in various roles, including Chief Financial Officer for GE Global Business Finance.
Stephen Hearn - Mr. Hearn, age 48, was appointed as an executive officer on January 1, 2012. Mr. Hearn joined the Willis Group in 2008 and was named Chairman and CEO of Willis Global in 2011, CEO of Willis Limited in 2012 and Group Deputy CEO in 2013. Since joining the Willis Group, Mr. Hearn has served as Chairman of Special Contingency Risk, Chairman of Willis Facultative and Chairman and CEO of Glencairn Limited. From 2009 until 2011 he led Faber & Dumas, Global Markets International and Willis Facultative. Prior to joining the Willis Group, Mr. Hearn served as Chairman and CEO of the Glencairn Group Limited and as President and CEO of Marsh Affinity Europe.
Todd Jones - Mr. Jones, age 50, was appointed as an executive officer and Chief Executive Officer of Willis North America on July 1, 2013. Mr. Jones joined Willis in 2003 as the North American Practice Leader for Willis’s Executive Risks Practice and served as the President of Willis North America from 2010 to 2013. Mr. Jones also served as a National Partner for the Northeast Region. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Jones held various leadership roles in the insurance brokerage industry. Before entering the brokerage industry, he was a financial analyst and corporate banker for a regional bank that is now part of Wells Fargo, focusing on the telecommunications industry.
David Shalders - Mr. Shalders, age 48, was appointed as an executive officer and Group Operations & Technology Director on November 4, 2013. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Shalders spent over a decade in senior operations and IT roles at the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, most recently as Global COO for Global Banking and Markets. Mr. Shalders also held roles as Head of London & Asia Operations and Head of Derivative Operations for NatWest at RBS.
Timothy D. Wright - Mr. Wright, age 53, was appointed as an executive officer in 2008 and in 2011 was appointed as CEO of Willis International. Mr. Wright served as Group Chief Operating Officer from 2008 to 2011. Prior to joining the Willis Group, he was a Partner of Bain & Company where he led their Financial Services practice in London. Mr. Wright was previously UK Managing Partner of Booz Allen & Hamilton and led their insurance work globally. He has more than 20 years of experience in the insurance and financial service industries internationally.


Item 1B — Unresolved Staff Comments
The Company had no unresolved comments from the SEC’s staff.

2313


Willis Group Holdings plc


Item 2 — Properties1A - Risk Factors
Risks Relating to our Business and the Insurance Industry
This section describes material risks affecting the Group’s business. These risks could materially affect the Group’s business, reputation, revenues, operating income, net income, net assets, liquidity and capital resources and ability to achieve its financial targets and, accordingly should be read in conjunction with any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Competitive Risks
Worldwide economic conditions could have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
Our business and operating results are materially affected by worldwide economic conditions. Current global economic conditions, including those associated with the Eurozone, coupled with low customer and business confidence may have a significant negative impact on the buying behavior of some of our clients as their businesses suffer from these conditions. Since 2008, many of our operations have been impacted by the weakened economic climate. A significant number of insolvencies associated with an economic downturn could adversely affect our brokerage business through the loss of clients or by hampering our ability to place insurance and reinsurance business. In addition, an increase in mergers and acquisitions can also result in the loss of clients. While it is difficult to predict the consequences of any further deterioration in global economic conditions on our business, any significant reduction or delay by our clients in purchasing insurance or making payment of premiums could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the potential for a significant insurer to fail, be downgraded or withdraw from writing certain lines of insurance coverages that we offer our clients could negatively impact overall capacity in the industry, which could then reduce the placement of certain lines and types of insurance and reduce our revenues and profitability. The potential for an insurer to fail or be downgraded could also result in errors and omissions claims by clients.
The credit and economic conditions of certain European Union countries remain fragile and may contribute to instability in the global credit and financial markets. If credit conditions worsen or financial market volatility increases in the Eurozone, it is possible that it could have a negative effect on the global economy as a whole, and our business, operating results and financial condition. If the Eurozone continues to deteriorate, there will likely be a negative effect on our European business, as well as the businesses of our European clients. Further, were the Euro to be withdrawn entirely, or the Eurozone were to be dissolved as a common currency area, the legal and contractual consequences for holders of Euro-denominated obligations would be determined by laws in effect at such time. A significant devaluation of the Euro would cause the value of our financial assets that are denominated in Euros to be significantly reduced. Any of these conditions could ultimately harm our overall business, prospects, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
We may not be able to fully realize the anticipated benefits of our growth strategy.
We have stated certain goals at our 2013 Investor Conference and our outlook for 2015. In order to achieve these goals, we are implementing certain revenue growth strategies and continue to strive to manage our cost base. For example, we announced a series of actions that include, among other things, our multi-year operational improvement program and initiatives to better connect Willis. In light of the potential operational risks associated with these new initiatives, we cannot be certain whether we will be able to realize benefits from current revenue-generating or cost-saving initiatives and ultimately realize our objectives. There can be no assurance that our actual results will meet these financial goals.
We do not control the premiums on which our commissions are based, and volatility or declines in premiums may seriously undermine our profitability.
We derive most of our revenues from commissions and fees for brokerage and consulting services and do not determine the insurance premiums on which our commissions are generally based. Commission levels generally follow the same trend as premium levels, as they are a percentage of the premiums paid by the insureds. Fluctuations in the premiums charged by the insurance carriers can therefore have a direct and potentially material impact on our results of operations. Due to the cyclical nature of the insurance market and the impact of other market conditions on insurance premiums, commission levels may vary widely between accounting periods. A period of low or declining premium rates, generally known as a 'soft' or 'softening' market, generally leads to downward pressure on commission revenues and can have a material adverse impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. A 'hard' or 'firming' market, during which premium rates rise, generally has a

14


Risk factors

favorable impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. Rates, however, vary by geography, industry and client segment. We have been and continue to be negatively impacted by soft market conditions across certain sectors and geographic regions. In addition, insurance carriers may seek to reduce their expenses by reducing the commission rates payable to insurance agents or brokers such as ourselves. The reduction of these commission rates, along with general volatility and/or declines in premiums, may significantly undermine our profitability.
Competition in our industry is intense, and if we are unable to compete effectively, we may suffer lower revenue, reduced operating margins and lose market share which could materially and adversely affect our business.
We face competition in all fields in which we operate, based on global capability, product breadth, innovation, quality of service and price. We compete with Marsh & McLennan and Aon, the two major global providers of global risk management services, as well as with numerous specialist, regional and local firms. Competition for business is intense in all of our business lines and in every insurance market, and Marsh & McLennan and Aon have substantially greater market share than we do. Competition on premium rates has also exacerbated the pressures caused by a continuing reduction in demand in some classes of business. For example, rather than purchase additional insurance through brokers, some insureds have been retaining a greater proportion of their risk portfolios than previously. Industrial and commercial companies increasingly rely upon their own subsidiary insurance companies, known as captive insurance companies, self-insurance pools, risk retention groups, mutual insurance companies and leaseother mechanisms for funding their risks, rather than buy insurance. Additional competitive pressures arise from the entry of non-traditional market participants, such as banks, accounting firms and insurance carriers themselves, offering risk management or transfer services. If we are unable to compete effectively, we may suffer lower revenue, reduced operating margins and lose market share which could materially and adversely affect our business.
The loss of our Chief Executive Officer or a number of propertiesour senior management or a significant number of our brokers could significantly impede our financial plans, growth, marketing and other objectives.
The loss of our Chief Executive Officer, a number of our senior management or a significant number of our brokers could significantly impede our financial plans, growth, marketing and other objectives. Our success depends to a substantial extent not only on the ability and experience of our Chief Executive Officer, Dominic Casserley, and other members of our senior management, but also on the individual brokers and teams that service our clients and maintain client relationships. The insurance and reinsurance brokerage industry has in the past experienced intense competition for use as offices throughout the worldservices of leading individual brokers and brokerage teams, and we have lost key individuals and teams to competitors. We believe that our propertiesfuture success will depend in part on our ability to attract and retain additional highly skilled and qualified personnel and to expand, train and manage our employee base. We may not continue to be successful in doing so because the competition for qualified personnel in our industry is intense.
We face certain risks associated with the acquisition or disposition of businesses and lack of control over investments in associates.
In pursuing our corporate strategy, we may acquire or dispose of or exit businesses or reorganize existing investments. For example, we have a call option to acquire 100 percent of the capital of our associate, Gras Savoye. The success of our overall acquisition and disposition strategy is dependent upon our ability to identify appropriate opportunities, negotiate transactions on favorable terms and ultimately complete such transactions. Once we complete acquisitions or reorganizations there can be no assurance that we will realize the anticipated benefits of any transaction, including revenue growth, operational efficiencies or expected synergies. For example, if we fail to recognize some or all of the strategic benefits and synergies expected from a transaction, goodwill and intangible assets may be impaired in future periods.
In addition, we may not be able to integrate acquisitions successfully into our existing business, and we could incur or assume unknown or unanticipated liabilities or contingencies, which may impact our results of operations. If we dispose of or otherwise exit certain businesses, there can be no assurance that we will not incur certain disposition related charges, or that we will be able to reduce the overheads related to the divested assets.
We also own an interest in a number of associates where we do not exercise management control and we are generallytherefore limited in our ability to direct or manage the business to realize the anticipated benefits that we can achieve if we had full ownership.
Investment in innovative product offerings may fail to yield sufficient return to cover their investment.
From time to time, we may enter new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There can be substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, including the investment of significant time and resources, the possibility that these efforts will be unprofitable, and the risk of additional liabilities associated with these efforts. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business and new products

15


Willis Group Holdings plc


and services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results for operations. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business. In addition, we can provide no assurance that the entry into new lines of business or development of new products and services will be successful.
We are continually developing and investing in new and innovative offerings that we believe will address needs that we identify in the market. Nevertheless, the ability of these efforts to produce meaningful value is dependent on a number of other factors, some of which are outside of our control. For example, we have invested substantial time and resources in launching The Willis Advantage under the belief that this exchange will serve a useful role to help corporations and individuals in the United States manage their growing health care expenses. But in order for The Willis Advantage to be successful, health care insurers and corporate and individual participants must deem it suitable to participate in, and such decisions are based on their own particular circumstances.
Our business performance and growth plans could be negatively affected if we are not able to effectively apply technology to drive value for our clients through technology-based solutions or gain internal efficiencies through the effective application of technology and related tools.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to develop and implement technology solutions that anticipate and keep pace with rapid and continuing changes in technology, industry standards and client preferences. We may not be successful in anticipating or responding to these developments in a timely and cost-effective manner, and our ideas may not be accepted in the marketplace. Additionally, the effort to gain technological expertise and develop new technologies in our business requires us to incur significant cost. Our competitors are seeking to develop competing technologies, and their success in this space may impact our ability to differentiate our services to our clients through the use of unique technological solutions. If we cannot offer new technologies as quickly as our competitors or if our competitors develop more cost-effective technologies, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to obtain and complete client engagements.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
Our compliance systems and controls cannot guarantee that we comply with all applicable federal and state or foreign laws and regulations, and actions by regulatory authorities or changes in applicable laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate may have an adverse effect on our business.
Our activities are subject to extensive regulation under the laws of the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and its member states, and the other jurisdictions around the world in which we operate. In addition, we own an interest in a number of associates where we do not exercise management control. Over the last few years, regulators across the world are increasingly seeking to regulate brokers who operate in their jurisdictions. Compliance with laws and regulations that apply to our operations is complex and increases our cost of doing business. These laws and regulations include insurance and financial industry regulations, economic and trade sanctions and laws against financial crimes, including client money and anti-money laundering, bribery or other corruption, such as the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, anti-competition and data privacy legislation. In most jurisdictions, governmental and regulatory authorities have the ability to interpret and amend these laws and regulations and impose penalties for non-compliance, including sanctions, civil remedies, monetary fines, injunctions, revocation of licenses or approvals, suspension of individuals, limitations on business activities or redress to clients. While we believe that we have substantially increased our focus on the geographic breadth of regulations to which we are subject, maintain good relationships with our key regulators and our current systems and controls are adequate, we cannot assure that such systems and controls will prevent any violations of any applicable laws and regulations.
Our business, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity may be materially adversely affected by actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and proceedings.
We are subject to various actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and other proceedings relating principally to alleged errors and omissions in connection with the placement of insurance and reinsurance in the ordinary course of business. Because we often assist our clients with matters, including the placement of insurance coverage and the handling of related claims, involving substantial amounts of money, errors and omissions claims against us may arise which allege our potential liability for all or part of the amounts in question.
Claimants can seek large damage awards and these claims can involve potentially significant defense costs. Such claims, lawsuits and other proceedings could, for example, include allegations of damages for our employees or sub-agents improperly failing to place coverage or notify claims on behalf of clients, to provide insurance carriers with complete and accurate information relating to the risks being insured or to appropriately apply funds that we hold for our clients on a fiduciary basis.

16


Risk factors

Errors and omissions claims, lawsuits and other proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business are covered in part by professional indemnity or other appropriate insurance. The terms of this insurance vary by policy year and self-insured risks have increased significantly in recent years. In respect of self-insured risks, we have established provisions against these items which we believe to be adequate in the light of current information and legal advice, and we adjust such provisions from time to time according to developments. Our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity may be adversely affected if in the future our insurance coverage proves to be inadequate or unavailable or there is an increase in liabilities for which we self-insure. Our ability to obtain professional indemnity insurance in the amounts and with the deductibles we desire in the future may be adversely impacted by general developments in the market for such insurance or our own claims experience.
We are also subject to actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and proceedings outside of errors and omissions claims. An example of material claims for which we are subject that are outside of the error and omissions claims context relate to those arising out of the collapse of The Stanford Financial Group, for which we acted as brokers of record on certain lines of insurance.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be ascertained and liabilities in indeterminate amounts may be imposed on us. It is thus possible that future results of operations or cash flows for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by an unfavorable resolution of these matters. In addition, these matters continue to divert management and personnel resources away from operating our business. Even if we do not experience significant monetary costs, there may also be adverse publicity associated with these matters that could result in reputational harm to the insurance brokerage industry in general or to us in particular that may adversely affect our business, client or employee relationships.
Accepting market derived income (MDI) may cause regulatory or other scrutiny, which may have a material and adverse effect on our business.
Insurance intermediaries have traditionally been remunerated by commission or fees paid by clients. Intermediaries also obtain revenue from insurance carriers. This is commonly known as market derived income or 'MDI'. MDI takes a variety of forms, including volume- or profit-based contingent commissions, facilities administration charges, business development agreements, and fees for providing certain data to carriers.
MDI creates various risks. Intermediaries have a duty to act in the best interests of their clients and payments from carriers can incentivize intermediaries to put carriers’ interests ahead of their clients. Accordingly, MDI may be subject to scrutiny by various regulators under conflict of interest, anti-trust, unfair competition, and anti-bribery laws and regulations. While accepting MDI is a lawful and acceptable business practice, and while we have established systems and controls to manage these risks, we cannot predict whether our position will result in regulatory or other scrutiny.
IT and Operational Risks
Data security breaches or improper disclosure of confidential company or personal data could result in material financial loss, loss of human capital, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
Computer viruses, hackers and other external hazards, as well as improper or inadvertent staff behavior could expose confidential company and personal data systems to security breaches. Additionally, one of our significant responsibilities is to maintain the security and privacy of our clients’ confidential and proprietary information and the personal data of their employees. These increased risks, and expanding regulatory requirements regarding data security, could expose us to data loss, monetary and reputational damages and significant increases in compliance costs.
With respect to our commercial arrangements with third-party vendors, we have processes designed to require third-party IT outsourcing, offsite storage and other vendors to agree to maintain certain standards with respect to the storage, protection and transfer of confidential, personal and proprietary information. However, we remain at risk of a data breach due to the intentional or unintentional non-compliance by a vendor’s employee or agent, the breakdown of a vendor’s data protection processes, or a cyber-attack on a vendor’s information systems.
We have experienced a number of data incidents, resulting from human error as well as attempts at unauthorized access to our systems, which to date have not had a material impact on our business, operations or clients.
We maintain policies, procedures and technological safeguards designed to protect the security and privacy of this information. However, we cannot entirely eliminate the risk of data security breaches, improper access to or disclosure of confidential company or personally identifiable information. Our technology may fail to adequately secure the private information we hold and protect it from theft, computer viruses, hackers or inadvertent loss. In such circumstances, we may be held liable to our clients, which could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue.

17


Willis Group Holdings plc


Further, data privacy, information security, identity theft, and related computer and internet issues are matters of growing public concern and are subject to frequently changing rules and regulations. Our failure to adhere to or successfully implement processes in response to changing regulatory requirements and customer expectations in this area could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation.
Interruption to or loss of our information processing capabilities or failure to effectively maintain and upgrade our information processing hardware or systems could cause material financial loss, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
Our business depends significantly on effective information systems. Our capacity to service our clients relies on effective storage, retrieval, processing and management of information. Our information systems also rely on the commitment of significant resources to maintain and enhance existing systems, develop and create new systems and products in order to keep pace with continuing changes in information processing technology or evolving industry and regulatory standards and to be at the forefront of a range of technology relevant to our business.
If the data we rely on to run our business were found to be inaccurate or unreliable or if we fail to maintain effective and efficient systems (including through a telecommunications failure, failure to replace or update redundant or obsolete computer hardware, applications or software systems or if we experience other disruptions), this could result in material financial loss, regulatory action, reputational harm or legal liability.
Our inability to successfully recover should we experience a natural disaster or other significant disruption to business continuity could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Our ability to conduct business may be adversely affected, even in the short-term, by a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our business and the communities where we are located. This may include a disruption caused by restricted physical site access, terrorist activities, disease pandemics, or outages to electrical, communications or other services used by our company, our employees or third parties with whom we conduct business. Although we have business continuity and disaster recovery procedures in place and insurance to protect against such contingencies, such procedures may not be entirely effective and any insurance or recovery procedures may not continue to be available at reasonable prices and may not address all such losses or compensate us for the purposespossible loss of clients occurring during any period that we are unable to provide services. Our inability to successfully recover should we experience a natural disaster or other significant disruption to business continuity could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Certain of our businesses pose underwriting, advisory or reputational risks and can have a significant adverse impact on our financial results.
We provide a broad range of brokerage, reinsurance and risk management consulting services to our clients worldwide. In addition, our Willis Capital Markets & Advisory business provides advice to insurance and reinsurance companies on a broad array of merger and acquisition transactions as well as capital markets products, including acting as underwriter or agent for primary issuances, operating a secondary insurance-linked securities trading desk and engaging in general capital markets and strategic advisory work. These operations may pose certain underwriting, advisory or reputational risks to our business.
Financial Risks
Our outstanding debt could adversely affect our cash flows and financial flexibility.
We had total consolidated debt outstanding of approximately $2.3 billion as of December 31, 2014 and our 2014 interest expense was $135 million. Although management believes that our cash flows will be sufficient to service this debt, there may be circumstances in which theyrequired payments of principal and/or interest on this debt could adversely affect our cash flows and this level of indebtedness may:
require us to dedicate a significant portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, thereby reducing the availability of cash flow to fund capital expenditures, to pursue other acquisitions or investments, to pay dividends and for general corporate purposes;
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic conditions, including if we borrow at variable interest rates, which makes us vulnerable to increases in interest rates generally;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes or challenges relating to our business and industry; and
put us at a competitive disadvantage against competitors who have less indebtedness or are used. in a more favorable

18


Risk factors

position to access additional capital resources.
The terms of our current financings also include certain limitations. For example, the agreements relating to the debt arrangements and credit facilities contain numerous operating and financial covenants, including requirements to maintain minimum ratios of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated cash interest expense and maximum levels of consolidated funded indebtedness in relation to consolidated EBITDA, in each case subject to certain adjustments.
A failure to comply with the restrictions under our credit facilities and outstanding notes could result in a default under the financing obligations or could require us to obtain waivers from our lenders for failure to comply with these restrictions. The occurrence of a default that remains uncured or the inability to secure a necessary consent or waiver could cause our obligations with respect to our debt to be accelerated and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our pension liabilities may increase which could require us to make additional cash contributions to our pension plans reducing the cash available for other uses.
We have two principal properties are locateddefined benefit plans: one in the United Kingdom and the other in the United States. Willis maintains over 4.1States, and in addition, we have several smaller defined benefit pension plans in certain other countries in which we operate.
In 2012, we agreed a revised funding strategy with the UK plan's trustee under which we are committed to make additional cash contributions in the event that our adjusted EBITDA exceeds certain thresholds, or we make exceptional returns for our shareholders, including share buybacks or special dividends. As a result, we may be committed to make additional contributions through to 2017 based on the prior year's performance. During 2015, we will be required to negotiate a new funding arrangement which may change the contributions we are required to make during 2015 and beyond.
Total cash contributions, excluding employees’ salary sacrifice contributions, to these defined benefit pension plans in 2014 were $112 million. In 2015, the Company currently expects to make cash contributions of approximately $116 million, square feetincluding exceptional returns, to these pension plans, although we may elect to contribute more. Future estimates are based on certain assumptions, including discount rates, interest rates, mortality, fair value of space worldwide.assets and expected return on plan assets.
We have taken actions to manage our pension liabilities, including closing our UK and US plans to new participants and restricting final pensionable salaries. Future benefit accruals in the US pension plan were also stopped, or frozen, on May 15, 2009. Nevertheless, the determination of pension expense and pension funding is based on a variety of rules and regulations. Changes in these rules and regulations could impact the calculation of pension plan liabilities and the valuation of pension plan assets. They may also result in higher pension costs, additional financial statement disclosure, and accelerate and increase the need to fully fund our pension plans through increased cash contributions. Further, a significant decline in the value of investments that fund our pension plan, if not offset or mitigated by a decline in our liabilities, may significantly alter the values and actuarial assumptions used to calculate our future pension expense and we could be required to fund our plan with significant additional amounts of cash. In addition to the critical assumptions described above, our plans use certain assumptions about the life expectancy of plan participants and surviving spouses. Periodic revision of those assumptions can materially change the present value of future benefits and therefore the funded status of the plans and the resulting periodic pension expense. Changes in our pension benefit obligations, the related net periodic costs or credits, and the required level of future cash contributions, may occur in the future due to any variance of actual results from our assumptions and changes in the number of participating employees. The need to make additional cash contributions may reduce our financial flexibility and increase liquidity risk by reducing the cash available to meet our other obligations, including the payment obligations under our credit facilities and other long-term debt, or other needs of our business.
We could incur substantial losses, including with respect to our own cash and fiduciary cash held on behalf of insurance companies and clients, if one of the financial institutions we use in our operations failed.
We maintain significant cash balances at various US depository institutions that are significantly in excess of the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. We also maintain significant cash balances in foreign financial institutions. A significant portion of this cash is fiduciary cash held on behalf of insurance companies or clients. If one or more of the institutions in which we maintain significant cash balances were to fail, our ability to access these funds might be temporarily or permanently limited, and we could face a material liquidity problem and potentially material financial losses. We would also be liable to claims made by the insurance companies or our clients regarding the fiduciary cash held on their behalf.

London

19


Willis Group Holdings plc


A downgrade to our corporate credit rating and the credit ratings of our outstanding debt may adversely affect our borrowing costs and financial flexibility and, under certain circumstances, may require us to offer to buy back some of our outstanding debt.
A downgrade in our corporate credit rating or the credit ratings of our debt would increase our borrowing costs including those under our credit facilities, and reduce our financial flexibility. In addition, certain downgrades would trigger a step-up in interest rates under the indentures for our 6.200% senior notes due 2017 and our 7.000% senior notes due 2019, which would increase our interest expense. If we need to raise capital in the future, any credit rating downgrade could negatively affect our financing costs or access to financing sources. This may in turn impact the assumptions when performing our goodwill impairment testing which may reduce the excess of fair value over carrying value of the reporting units.
In Londonaddition, under the indenture for our 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and our 6.125% senior notes due 2043, if we occupyexperience a prime site comprising 491,000 square feet spread overratings decline together with a 28-story towerchange of control event, we would be required to offer to purchase our 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and adjoining 10-story building. our 6.125% senior notes due 2043 from holders unless we had previously redeemed those notes. We may not have sufficient funds available or access to funding to repurchase tendered notes in that event, which could result in a default under the notes. Any future debt that we incur may contain covenants regarding repurchases in the event of a change of control triggering event.
We are a holding company and, therefore, may not be able to receive dividends or other distributions in needed amounts from our subsidiaries.
Willis Group Holdings is a holding company that conducts no business of its own. We are dependent upon dividends and other payments from our operating subsidiaries to meet our obligations for paying principal and interest on outstanding debt obligations, for paying dividends to shareholders and for corporate expenses. Legal and regulatory restrictions, foreign exchange controls, as well as operating requirements of our subsidiaries, may limit our ability to obtain cash from these subsidiaries. For example, Willis Limited, our UK brokerage subsidiary regulated by the FCA, is currently required to maintain $126 million in unencumbered and available funds, of which at least $79 million must be in cash, for regulatory purposes. In the event our operating subsidiaries are unable to pay dividends and make other payments to Willis Group Holdings, we may not be able to service debt, pay obligations or pay dividends on ordinary shares.
If our goodwill becomes impaired, we may be required to record significant charges to earnings, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings.
We have a 25-year leasesubstantial amount of goodwill on this property which expires June 2032.our balance sheet as a result of acquisitions we have completed. We sub-let approximately 17,500 square feetreview goodwill for impairment annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. Application of the 28-story towerimpairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assignment of assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting units and determination of fair value of each reporting unit. Notwithstanding the fact that we recognized an impairment charge in fiscal year 2012 for our North American reporting unit, the risk remains that a significant deterioration in a key estimate or assumption or a less significant deterioration to a third party. We also sub-letcombination of assumptions or the 10-story adjoining building.sale of a part of a reporting unit could result in an impairment charge in the future, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings.

For further information on our testing for goodwill impairment, see ‘Critical Accounting Estimates’ under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
North America

Our North America business provides risk management, insurance brokerage, related risk services, and employee benefits brokerage and consulting to a wide array of industry and client segments in the United States and Canada. With around 80 locations, organized into seven geographical regions including Canada, Willis North America locally delivers our global and national resources and specialist expertise through this retail distribution network.

In addition to being organized geographically and by specialty, our North America business focuses on four client segments: global, large national/middle-market, small commercial, and private client, with service, marketing and sales platform support for each segment.

Construction
The largest industry practice group in North America is Construction, which specializes in providing risk management, insurance brokerage, and surety bonding services to the construction industry. Willis Construction provided these services to nearly 10,000 clients including approximately 20 percent of the Engineering News Record Top 400 contractors (a listing of the largest 400 North American contractors based on reported revenue). In addition, this practice group has expertise in professional liability insurance, controlled insurance programs for large projects and insurance for national homebuilders.

Human Capital
Willis Human Capital, fully integrated into the North America platform, is the Group's largest product-based practice group and provides health, welfare and human resources consulting, and brokerage services to all of our commercial client segments. This practice group's value lies in helping clients control employee benefit plan costs, reducing the amount of time human resources professionals spend administering their companies' benefit plans and educating and training employees on benefit plan issues.

Executive Risks
Another industry-leading North America practice group is Willis Executive Risks, a national team of technical professionals who specialize in meeting the directors and officers, employment practices, fiduciary liability insurance risk management, and claims advocacy needs of public and private corporations and organizations. This practice group also has expertise in professional liability, especially cyber risks.

Other industry practice groups
Other industry practice groups include Healthcare, serving the professional liability and other insurance and risk management needs of private and not-for-profit health systems, hospitals and physicians groups; Financial Institutions, serving the needs of large banks, insurers and other financial services firms; and Mergers & Acquisitions, providing due diligence, and risk management and insurance brokerage services to private equity and merchant banking firms and their portfolio companies.

International
Our International business comprises our operations in Western Europe, Central and Eastern Europe, Asia, Australasia, the Middle East, South Africa and Latin America.
Our offices provide services to businesses locally in nearly 120 countries around the world, making use of local expertise as well as skills, industry knowledge and expertise available elsewhere in the Group.

10


About Willis

The services provided are focused according to the characteristics of each market and vary across offices, but generally include direct risk management and insurance brokerage, specialist and reinsurance brokerage and employee benefits consulting.
As part of our ongoing strategy, we continue to look for opportunities to strengthen our International market share through acquisitions and strategic investments. A list of significant subsidiaries is included in Exhibit 21.1 to this document.

We have also invested in associate companies; our significant associates at December 31, 2014 were GS & Cie Groupe ('Gras Savoye'), a French organization (30 percent holding) and Al-Futtaim Willis Co. LLC, organized under the laws of Dubai (49 percent holding). In connection with many of our investments we retain the right to increase our ownership over time, typically to a majority or 100 percent ownership position.
We believe the combined total revenues of our International subsidiaries and associates provide an indication of the spread and capability of our International network.
Management structure
During the first quarter 2015 we have reorganized our business from three reporting units (formerly known as Global, North America and International) into four reporting units: Willis Capital, Wholesale and Reinsurance, Willis North America, Willis International, and Willis Great Britain "Willis GB".
Willis North America and Willis International remain largely unchanged except for certain specialty teams previously included within Global are now included within the geographic regions in which they are located.
Willis Capital, Wholesale and Reinsurance includes Willis Re, Willis Capital Markets and Advisory and our wholesale businesses as well as a new unit called Willis Portfolio and Underwriting Services.
Willis GB includes our UK retail, facultative and London specialty businesses.
Customers
Our clients operate on a global and local scale in a multitude of businesses and industries throughout the world and generally range in size from major multinational corporations to middle-market companies. Further, many of our client relationships span decades, for instance our relationship with The Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company Limited dates back over 100 years. No one client accounted for more than 10 percent of revenues for fiscal year 2014. Additionally, we place insurance with approximately 2,500 insurance carriers, none of which individually accounted for more than 10 percent of the total premiums we placed on behalf of our clients in 2014.
Competition
We face competition in all fields in which we operate, based on global capability, product breadth, innovation, quality of service and price. We compete with Marsh & McLennan and Aon, the two other major providers of global risk management services, as well as with numerous specialist, regional and local firms. Competition for business is intense in all of our business lines and in every insurance market, and Marsh & McLennan and Aon have substantially greater market share than we do. Competition on premium rates has also exacerbated the pressures caused by a continuing reduction in demand in some classes of business. For example, rather than purchase additional insurance through brokers, some insureds have been retaining a greater proportion of their risk portfolios than previously. Industrial and commercial companies increasingly rely upon their own subsidiary insurance companies, known as captive insurance companies, self-insurance pools, risk retention groups, mutual insurance companies and other mechanisms for funding their risks, rather than buy insurance. Additional competitive pressures arise from the entry of new market participants, such as banks, accounting firms and insurance carriers themselves, offering risk management or transfer services.


11


Willis Group Holdings plc


Regulation
Our business activities are subject to legal requirements and governmental and quasi-governmental regulatory supervision in all countries in which we operate. Also, such regulations may require individual or company licensing to conduct our business activities. While these requirements may vary from location to location they are generally designed to protect our clients by establishing minimum standards of conduct and practice, particularly regarding the provision of advice and product information as well as financial criteria. Our three most significant regulatory regions are described below:
United States
Our activities in connection with insurance brokerage services within the United States are subject to regulation and supervision by state authorities. Although the scope of regulation and form of supervision may vary from state to state, insurance laws in the United States are often complex and generally grant broad discretion to supervisory authorities in adopting regulations and supervising regulated activities. That supervision generally includes the licensing of insurance brokers and agents and the regulation of the handling and investment of client funds held in a fiduciary capacity. Our continuing ability to provide insurance brokerage in the states in which we currently operate is dependent upon our compliance with the rules and regulations promulgated from time to time by the regulatory authorities in each of these states.
European Union
In 2005, the European Union Insurance Mediation Directive introduced rules to enable insurance and reinsurance intermediaries to operate and provide services within each member state of the European Union on a basis consistent with the EU single market and customer protection aims. Each EU member state in which we operate is required to ensure that the insurance and reinsurance intermediaries resident in their country are registered with a statutory body in that country and that each intermediary meets professional requirements in relation to their competence, good repute, professional indemnity cover and financial capacity.
United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom, our business is regulated by the Financial Conduct Auditory ('FCA'). The FCA has a wide range of rule-making, investigatory and enforcement powers, and conducts monitoring visits to assess our compliance with regulatory requirements.
The FCA has a sole strategic objective: to protect and enhance confidence in the UK financial system. Its operational objectives are to: secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers; promote efficiency and choice in the market for financial services; and protect and enhance the integrity of the UK financial system. The FCA also has a duty to act in a way that promotes competition, and to minimize the extent to which regulated businesses may be used for a purpose connected with financial crime. Finally, the FCA has new powers in product intervention. For instance, it can instruct firms to withdraw or amend misleading financial promotions.
Other
Certain of our activities are governed by other regulatory bodies, such as investment and securities licensing authorities. In the United States, our Willis Capital Markets & Advisory business operates through our wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Securities, Inc., a US-registered broker-dealer and member FINRA/SIPC, primarily in connection with investment banking-related services and advising on alternative risk financing transactions. Willis Capital Markets provides advice on securities or investments in the European Union and Australia through our UK wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Capital Markets & Advisory Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the FCA. Willis Capital Markets, through our Hong Kong wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Capital Markets & Advisory (Hong Kong) Limited, is in the process of obtaining securities and advisory licenses through, and will be regulated by, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.
Our failure, or that of our employees, to satisfy the regulators that we comply with their requirements or the legal requirements governing our activities, can result in disciplinary action, fines, reputational damage and financial harm.
All companies carrying on similar activities in a given jurisdiction are subject to regulations which are not dissimilar to the requirements for our operations in the United States and United Kingdom. We do not consider that these regulatory requirements adversely affect our competitive position.
See Part I, Item 1A-Risk Factors ‘Legal and Regulatory Risks’ for discussion of how actions by regulatory authorities or changes in legislation and regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate may have an adverse effect on our business.

12


About Willis

Employees
As of December 31, 2014 we had approximately 18,400 employees worldwide of whom approximately 3,500 were employed in the United Kingdom and 5,900 in the United States, with the balance being employed across the rest of the world. In addition, our associates had approximately 3,700 employees, all of whom were located outside the United Kingdom and the United States.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The executive officers of the Company as of February 20, 2015 were as follows:
Celia Brown - Ms. Brown, age 60, was appointed as an executive officer on January 23, 2012. Ms. Brown joined the Willis Group in 2010 and serves as the Willis Group Human Resources Director. Prior to joining the Willis Group, Ms. Brown spent over 20 years at XL Group plc where she held a number of senior roles. Ms. Brown served from 2006 to 2009 as the Executive Vice President, Head of Global HR and Corporate Relations at XL Group plc. Following XL Group plc, Ms. Brown formed an independent management consultancy, providing human resources services to not-for-profit, corporate and individual clients.
Dominic Casserley - Mr. Casserley, age 57, was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of Willis Group Holdings and as a member of the Board on January 7, 2013. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Casserley, was a senior partner of McKinsey & Company, which he joined in New York in 1983. During his 29 years at McKinsey, Mr. Casserley led the firm's Greater China Practice and its UK and Ireland Practice. Mr. Casserley had been a member of the McKinsey Shareholders Council, the firm's global board, since 1999 and for four years served as the Chairman of the Finance Committee of that board.
John Greene - Mr. Greene, age 49, has served as Chief Financial Officer of Willis Group Holdings since June 2, 2014. Mr. Greene joined Willis Group Holdings after more than eight years with HSBC Holdings, where he served as Chief Financial Officer for their global Retail Bank and Wealth Management business. Previously, Mr. Greene served at HSBC Holdings as Chief Financial Officer for HSBC Insurance and Chief Financial Officer for the Consumer & Mortgage Lending business. Prior to HSBC, he was with GE for twelve years in various roles, including Chief Financial Officer for GE Global Business Finance.
Stephen Hearn - Mr. Hearn, age 48, was appointed as an executive officer on January 1, 2012. Mr. Hearn joined the Willis Group in 2008 and was named Chairman and CEO of Willis Global in 2011, CEO of Willis Limited in 2012 and Group Deputy CEO in 2013. Since joining the Willis Group, Mr. Hearn has served as Chairman of Special Contingency Risk, Chairman of Willis Facultative and Chairman and CEO of Glencairn Limited. From 2009 until 2011 he led Faber & Dumas, Global Markets International and Willis Facultative. Prior to joining the Willis Group, Mr. Hearn served as Chairman and CEO of the Glencairn Group Limited and as President and CEO of Marsh Affinity Europe.
Todd Jones - Mr. Jones, age 50, was appointed as an executive officer and Chief Executive Officer of Willis North America on July 1, 2013. Mr. Jones joined Willis in 2003 as the North American Practice Leader for Willis’s Executive Risks Practice and served as the President of Willis North America from 2010 to 2013. Mr. Jones also served as a National Partner for the Northeast Region. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Jones held various leadership roles in the insurance brokerage industry. Before entering the brokerage industry, he was a financial analyst and corporate banker for a regional bank that is now part of Wells Fargo, focusing on the telecommunications industry.
David Shalders - Mr. Shalders, age 48, was appointed as an executive officer and Group Operations & Technology Director on November 4, 2013. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Shalders spent over a decade in senior operations and IT roles at the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, most recently as Global COO for Global Banking and Markets. Mr. Shalders also held roles as Head of London & Asia Operations and Head of Derivative Operations for NatWest at RBS.
Timothy D. Wright - Mr. Wright, age 53, was appointed as an executive officer in 2008 and in 2011 was appointed as CEO of Willis International. Mr. Wright served as Group Chief Operating Officer from 2008 to 2011. Prior to joining the Willis Group, he was a Partner of Bain & Company where he led their Financial Services practice in London. Mr. Wright was previously UK Managing Partner of Booz Allen & Hamilton and led their insurance work globally. He has more than 20 years of experience in the insurance and financial service industries internationally.



13


Willis Group Holdings plc


Item1A - Risk Factors
Risks Relating to our Business and the Insurance Industry
This section describes material risks affecting the Group’s business. These risks could materially affect the Group’s business, reputation, revenues, operating income, net income, net assets, liquidity and capital resources and ability to achieve its financial targets and, accordingly should be read in conjunction with any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Competitive Risks
Worldwide economic conditions could have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
Our business and operating results are materially affected by worldwide economic conditions. Current global economic conditions, including those associated with the Eurozone, coupled with low customer and business confidence may have a significant negative impact on the buying behavior of some of our clients as their businesses suffer from these conditions. Since 2008, many of our operations have been impacted by the weakened economic climate. A significant number of insolvencies associated with an economic downturn could adversely affect our brokerage business through the loss of clients or by hampering our ability to place insurance and reinsurance business. In addition, an increase in mergers and acquisitions can also result in the loss of clients. While it is difficult to predict the consequences of any further deterioration in global economic conditions on our business, any significant reduction or delay by our clients in purchasing insurance or making payment of premiums could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the potential for a significant insurer to fail, be downgraded or withdraw from writing certain lines of insurance coverages that we offer our clients could negatively impact overall capacity in the industry, which could then reduce the placement of certain lines and types of insurance and reduce our revenues and profitability. The potential for an insurer to fail or be downgraded could also result in errors and omissions claims by clients.
The credit and economic conditions of certain European Union countries remain fragile and may contribute to instability in the global credit and financial markets. If credit conditions worsen or financial market volatility increases in the Eurozone, it is possible that it could have a negative effect on the global economy as a whole, and our business, operating results and financial condition. If the Eurozone continues to deteriorate, there will likely be a negative effect on our European business, as well as the businesses of our European clients. Further, were the Euro to be withdrawn entirely, or the Eurozone were to be dissolved as a common currency area, the legal and contractual consequences for holders of Euro-denominated obligations would be determined by laws in effect at such time. A significant devaluation of the Euro would cause the value of our financial assets that are denominated in Euros to be significantly reduced. Any of these conditions could ultimately harm our overall business, prospects, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
We may not be able to fully realize the anticipated benefits of our growth strategy.
We have stated certain goals at our 2013 Investor Conference and our outlook for 2015. In order to achieve these goals, we are implementing certain revenue growth strategies and continue to strive to manage our cost base. For example, we announced a series of actions that include, among other things, our multi-year operational improvement program and initiatives to better connect Willis. In light of the potential operational risks associated with these new initiatives, we cannot be certain whether we will be able to realize benefits from current revenue-generating or cost-saving initiatives and ultimately realize our objectives. There can be no assurance that our actual results will meet these financial goals.
We do not control the premiums on which our commissions are based, and volatility or declines in premiums may seriously undermine our profitability.
We derive most of our revenues from commissions and fees for brokerage and consulting services and do not determine the insurance premiums on which our commissions are generally based. Commission levels generally follow the same trend as premium levels, as they are a percentage of the premiums paid by the insureds. Fluctuations in the premiums charged by the insurance carriers can therefore have a direct and potentially material impact on our results of operations. Due to the cyclical nature of the insurance market and the impact of other market conditions on insurance premiums, commission levels may vary widely between accounting periods. A period of low or declining premium rates, generally known as a 'soft' or 'softening' market, generally leads to downward pressure on commission revenues and can have a material adverse impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. A 'hard' or 'firming' market, during which premium rates rise, generally has a

14


Risk factors

favorable impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. Rates, however, vary by geography, industry and client segment. We have been and continue to be negatively impacted by soft market conditions across certain sectors and geographic regions. In addition, insurance carriers may seek to reduce their expenses by reducing the commission rates payable to insurance agents or brokers such as ourselves. The reduction of these commission rates, along with general volatility and/or declines in premiums, may significantly undermine our profitability.
Competition in our industry is intense, and if we are unable to compete effectively, we may suffer lower revenue, reduced operating margins and lose market share which could materially and adversely affect our business.
We face competition in all fields in which we operate, based on global capability, product breadth, innovation, quality of service and price. We compete with Marsh & McLennan and Aon, the two major global providers of global risk management services, as well as with numerous specialist, regional and local firms. Competition for business is intense in all of our business lines and in every insurance market, and Marsh & McLennan and Aon have substantially greater market share than we do. Competition on premium rates has also exacerbated the pressures caused by a continuing reduction in demand in some classes of business. For example, rather than purchase additional insurance through brokers, some insureds have been retaining a greater proportion of their risk portfolios than previously. Industrial and commercial companies increasingly rely upon their own subsidiary insurance companies, known as captive insurance companies, self-insurance pools, risk retention groups, mutual insurance companies and other mechanisms for funding their risks, rather than buy insurance. Additional competitive pressures arise from the entry of non-traditional market participants, such as banks, accounting firms and insurance carriers themselves, offering risk management or transfer services. If we are unable to compete effectively, we may suffer lower revenue, reduced operating margins and lose market share which could materially and adversely affect our business.
The loss of our Chief Executive Officer or a number of our senior management or a significant number of our brokers could significantly impede our financial plans, growth, marketing and other objectives.
The loss of our Chief Executive Officer, a number of our senior management or a significant number of our brokers could significantly impede our financial plans, growth, marketing and other objectives. Our success depends to a substantial extent not only on the ability and experience of our Chief Executive Officer, Dominic Casserley, and other members of our senior management, but also on the individual brokers and teams that service our clients and maintain client relationships. The insurance and reinsurance brokerage industry has in the past experienced intense competition for the services of leading individual brokers and brokerage teams, and we have lost key individuals and teams to competitors. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our ability to attract and retain additional highly skilled and qualified personnel and to expand, train and manage our employee base. We may not continue to be successful in doing so because the competition for qualified personnel in our industry is intense.
We face certain risks associated with the acquisition or disposition of businesses and lack of control over investments in associates.
In pursuing our corporate strategy, we may acquire or dispose of or exit businesses or reorganize existing investments. For example, we have a call option to acquire 100 percent of the capital of our associate, Gras Savoye. The success of our overall acquisition and disposition strategy is dependent upon our ability to identify appropriate opportunities, negotiate transactions on favorable terms and ultimately complete such transactions. Once we complete acquisitions or reorganizations there can be no assurance that we will realize the anticipated benefits of any transaction, including revenue growth, operational efficiencies or expected synergies. For example, if we fail to recognize some or all of the strategic benefits and synergies expected from a transaction, goodwill and intangible assets may be impaired in future periods.
In addition, we may not be able to integrate acquisitions successfully into our existing business, and we could incur or assume unknown or unanticipated liabilities or contingencies, which may impact our results of operations. If we dispose of or otherwise exit certain businesses, there can be no assurance that we will not incur certain disposition related charges, or that we will be able to reduce the overheads related to the divested assets.
We also own an interest in a number of associates where we do not exercise management control and we are therefore limited in our ability to direct or manage the business to realize the anticipated benefits that we can achieve if we had full ownership.
Investment in innovative product offerings may fail to yield sufficient return to cover their investment.
From time to time, we may enter new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There can be substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, including the investment of significant time and resources, the possibility that these efforts will be unprofitable, and the risk of additional liabilities associated with these efforts. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business and new products

15


Willis Group Holdings plc


and services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results for operations. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business. In addition, we can provide no assurance that the entry into new lines of business or development of new products and services will be successful.
We are continually developing and investing in new and innovative offerings that we believe will address needs that we identify in the market. Nevertheless, the ability of these efforts to produce meaningful value is dependent on a number of other factors, some of which are outside of our control. For example, we have invested substantial time and resources in launching The Willis Advantage under the belief that this exchange will serve a useful role to help corporations and individuals in the United States manage their growing health care expenses. But in order for The Willis Advantage to be successful, health care insurers and corporate and individual participants must deem it suitable to participate in, and such decisions are based on their own particular circumstances.
Our business performance and growth plans could be negatively affected if we are not able to effectively apply technology to drive value for our clients through technology-based solutions or gain internal efficiencies through the effective application of technology and related tools.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to develop and implement technology solutions that anticipate and keep pace with rapid and continuing changes in technology, industry standards and client preferences. We may not be successful in anticipating or responding to these developments in a timely and cost-effective manner, and our ideas may not be accepted in the marketplace. Additionally, the effort to gain technological expertise and develop new technologies in our business requires us to incur significant cost. Our competitors are seeking to develop competing technologies, and their success in this space may impact our ability to differentiate our services to our clients through the use of unique technological solutions. If we cannot offer new technologies as quickly as our competitors or if our competitors develop more cost-effective technologies, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to obtain and complete client engagements.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
Our compliance systems and controls cannot guarantee that we comply with all applicable federal and state or foreign laws and regulations, and actions by regulatory authorities or changes in applicable laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate may have an adverse effect on our business.
Our activities are subject to extensive regulation under the laws of the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and its member states, and the other jurisdictions around the world in which we operate. In addition, we own an interest in a number of associates where we do not exercise management control. Over the last few years, regulators across the world are increasingly seeking to regulate brokers who operate in their jurisdictions. Compliance with laws and regulations that apply to our operations is complex and increases our cost of doing business. These laws and regulations include insurance and financial industry regulations, economic and trade sanctions and laws against financial crimes, including client money and anti-money laundering, bribery or other corruption, such as the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, anti-competition and data privacy legislation. In most jurisdictions, governmental and regulatory authorities have the ability to interpret and amend these laws and regulations and impose penalties for non-compliance, including sanctions, civil remedies, monetary fines, injunctions, revocation of licenses or approvals, suspension of individuals, limitations on business activities or redress to clients. While we believe that we have substantially increased our focus on the geographic breadth of regulations to which we are subject, maintain good relationships with our key regulators and our current systems and controls are adequate, we cannot assure that such systems and controls will prevent any violations of any applicable laws and regulations.
Our business, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity may be materially adversely affected by actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and proceedings.
We are subject to various actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and other proceedings relating principally to alleged errors and omissions in connection with the placement of insurance and reinsurance in the ordinary course of business. Because we often assist our clients with matters, including the placement of insurance coverage and the handling of related claims, involving substantial amounts of money, errors and omissions claims against us may arise which allege our potential liability for all or part of the amounts in question.
Claimants can seek large damage awards and these claims can involve potentially significant defense costs. Such claims, lawsuits and other proceedings could, for example, include allegations of damages for our employees or sub-agents improperly failing to place coverage or notify claims on behalf of clients, to provide insurance carriers with complete and accurate information relating to the risks being insured or to appropriately apply funds that we hold for our clients on a fiduciary basis.

16


Risk factors

Errors and omissions claims, lawsuits and other proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business are covered in part by professional indemnity or other appropriate insurance. The terms of this insurance vary by policy year and self-insured risks have increased significantly in recent years. In respect of self-insured risks, we have established provisions against these items which we believe to be adequate in the light of current information and legal advice, and we adjust such provisions from time to time according to developments. Our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity may be adversely affected if in the future our insurance coverage proves to be inadequate or unavailable or there is an increase in liabilities for which we self-insure. Our ability to obtain professional indemnity insurance in the amounts and with the deductibles we desire in the future may be adversely impacted by general developments in the market for such insurance or our own claims experience.
We are also subject to actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and proceedings outside of errors and omissions claims. An example of material claims for which we are subject that are outside of the error and omissions claims context relate to those arising out of the collapse of The Stanford Financial Group, for which we acted as brokers of record on certain lines of insurance.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be ascertained and liabilities in indeterminate amounts may be imposed on us. It is thus possible that future results of operations or cash flows for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by an unfavorable resolution of these matters. In addition, these matters continue to divert management and personnel resources away from operating our business. Even if we do not experience significant monetary costs, there may also be adverse publicity associated with these matters that could result in reputational harm to the insurance brokerage industry in general or to us in particular that may adversely affect our business, client or employee relationships.
Accepting market derived income (MDI) may cause regulatory or other scrutiny, which may have a material and adverse effect on our business.
Insurance intermediaries have traditionally been remunerated by commission or fees paid by clients. Intermediaries also obtain revenue from insurance carriers. This is commonly known as market derived income or 'MDI'. MDI takes a variety of forms, including volume- or profit-based contingent commissions, facilities administration charges, business development agreements, and fees for providing certain data to carriers.
MDI creates various risks. Intermediaries have a duty to act in the best interests of their clients and payments from carriers can incentivize intermediaries to put carriers’ interests ahead of their clients. Accordingly, MDI may be subject to scrutiny by various regulators under conflict of interest, anti-trust, unfair competition, and anti-bribery laws and regulations. While accepting MDI is a lawful and acceptable business practice, and while we have established systems and controls to manage these risks, we cannot predict whether our position will result in regulatory or other scrutiny.
IT and Operational Risks
Data security breaches or improper disclosure of confidential company or personal data could result in material financial loss, loss of human capital, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
Computer viruses, hackers and other external hazards, as well as improper or inadvertent staff behavior could expose confidential company and personal data systems to security breaches. Additionally, one of our significant responsibilities is to maintain the security and privacy of our clients’ confidential and proprietary information and the personal data of their employees. These increased risks, and expanding regulatory requirements regarding data security, could expose us to data loss, monetary and reputational damages and significant increases in compliance costs.
With respect to our commercial arrangements with third-party vendors, we have processes designed to require third-party IT outsourcing, offsite storage and other vendors to agree to maintain certain standards with respect to the storage, protection and transfer of confidential, personal and proprietary information. However, we remain at risk of a data breach due to the intentional or unintentional non-compliance by a vendor’s employee or agent, the breakdown of a vendor’s data protection processes, or a cyber-attack on a vendor’s information systems.
We have experienced a number of data incidents, resulting from human error as well as attempts at unauthorized access to our systems, which to date have not had a material impact on our business, operations or clients.
We maintain policies, procedures and technological safeguards designed to protect the security and privacy of this information. However, we cannot entirely eliminate the risk of data security breaches, improper access to or disclosure of confidential company or personally identifiable information. Our technology may fail to adequately secure the private information we hold and protect it from theft, computer viruses, hackers or inadvertent loss. In such circumstances, we may be held liable to our clients, which could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue.

17


Willis Group Holdings plc


Further, data privacy, information security, identity theft, and related computer and internet issues are matters of growing public concern and are subject to frequently changing rules and regulations. Our failure to adhere to or successfully implement processes in response to changing regulatory requirements and customer expectations in this area could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation.
Interruption to or loss of our information processing capabilities or failure to effectively maintain and upgrade our information processing hardware or systems could cause material financial loss, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
Our business depends significantly on effective information systems. Our capacity to service our clients relies on effective storage, retrieval, processing and management of information. Our information systems also rely on the commitment of significant resources to maintain and enhance existing systems, develop and create new systems and products in order to keep pace with continuing changes in information processing technology or evolving industry and regulatory standards and to be at the forefront of a range of technology relevant to our business.
If the data we rely on to run our business were found to be inaccurate or unreliable or if we fail to maintain effective and efficient systems (including through a telecommunications failure, failure to replace or update redundant or obsolete computer hardware, applications or software systems or if we experience other disruptions), this could result in material financial loss, regulatory action, reputational harm or legal liability.
Our inability to successfully recover should we experience a natural disaster or other significant disruption to business continuity could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Our ability to conduct business may be adversely affected, even in the short-term, by a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our business and the communities where we are located. This may include a disruption caused by restricted physical site access, terrorist activities, disease pandemics, or outages to electrical, communications or other services used by our company, our employees or third parties with whom we conduct business. Although we have business continuity and disaster recovery procedures in place and insurance to protect against such contingencies, such procedures may not be entirely effective and any insurance or recovery procedures may not continue to be available at reasonable prices and may not address all such losses or compensate us for the possible loss of clients occurring during any period that we are unable to provide services. Our inability to successfully recover should we experience a natural disaster or other significant disruption to business continuity could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Certain of our businesses pose underwriting, advisory or reputational risks and can have a significant adverse impact on our financial results.
We provide a broad range of brokerage, reinsurance and risk management consulting services to our clients worldwide. In addition, our Willis Capital Markets & Advisory business provides advice to insurance and reinsurance companies on a broad array of merger and acquisition transactions as well as capital markets products, including acting as underwriter or agent for primary issuances, operating a secondary insurance-linked securities trading desk and engaging in general capital markets and strategic advisory work. These operations may pose certain underwriting, advisory or reputational risks to our business.
Financial Risks
Our outstanding debt could adversely affect our cash flows and financial flexibility.
We had total consolidated debt outstanding of approximately $2.3 billion as of December 31, 2014 and our 2014 interest expense was $135 million. Although management believes that our cash flows will be sufficient to service this debt, there may be circumstances in which required payments of principal and/or interest on this debt could adversely affect our cash flows and this level of indebtedness may:
require us to dedicate a significant portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, thereby reducing the availability of cash flow to fund capital expenditures, to pursue other acquisitions or investments, to pay dividends and for general corporate purposes;
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic conditions, including if we borrow at variable interest rates, which makes us vulnerable to increases in interest rates generally;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes or challenges relating to our business and industry; and
put us at a competitive disadvantage against competitors who have less indebtedness or are in a more favorable

18


Risk factors

position to access additional capital resources.
The terms of our current financings also include certain limitations. For example, the agreements relating to the debt arrangements and credit facilities contain numerous operating and financial covenants, including requirements to maintain minimum ratios of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated cash interest expense and maximum levels of consolidated funded indebtedness in relation to consolidated EBITDA, in each case subject to certain adjustments.
A failure to comply with the restrictions under our credit facilities and outstanding notes could result in a default under the financing obligations or could require us to obtain waivers from our lenders for failure to comply with these restrictions. The occurrence of a default that remains uncured or the inability to secure a necessary consent or waiver could cause our obligations with respect to our debt to be accelerated and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our pension liabilities may increase which could require us to make additional cash contributions to our pension plans reducing the cash available for other uses.
We have two principal defined benefit plans: one in the United Kingdom and the other in the United States, and in addition, we have several smaller defined benefit pension plans in certain other countries in which we operate.
In 2012, we agreed a revised funding strategy with the UK plan's trustee under which we are committed to make additional cash contributions in the event that our adjusted EBITDA exceeds certain thresholds, or we make exceptional returns for our shareholders, including share buybacks or special dividends. As a result, we may be committed to make additional contributions through to 2017 based on the prior year's performance. During 2015, we will be required to negotiate a new funding arrangement which may change the contributions we are required to make during 2015 and beyond.
Total cash contributions, excluding employees’ salary sacrifice contributions, to these defined benefit pension plans in 2014 were $112 million. In 2015, the Company currently expects to make cash contributions of approximately $116 million, including exceptional returns, to these pension plans, although we may elect to contribute more. Future estimates are based on certain assumptions, including discount rates, interest rates, mortality, fair value of assets and expected return on plan assets.
We have taken actions to manage our pension liabilities, including closing our UK and US plans to new participants and restricting final pensionable salaries. Future benefit accruals in the US pension plan were also stopped, or frozen, on May 15, 2009. Nevertheless, the determination of pension expense and pension funding is based on a variety of rules and regulations. Changes in these rules and regulations could impact the calculation of pension plan liabilities and the valuation of pension plan assets. They may also result in higher pension costs, additional financial statement disclosure, and accelerate and increase the need to fully fund our pension plans through increased cash contributions. Further, a significant decline in the value of investments that fund our pension plan, if not offset or mitigated by a decline in our liabilities, may significantly alter the values and actuarial assumptions used to calculate our future pension expense and we could be required to fund our plan with significant additional amounts of cash. In addition to the critical assumptions described above, our plans use certain assumptions about the life expectancy of plan participants and surviving spouses. Periodic revision of those assumptions can materially change the present value of future benefits and therefore the funded status of the plans and the resulting periodic pension expense. Changes in our pension benefit obligations, the related net periodic costs or credits, and the required level of future cash contributions, may occur in the future due to any variance of actual results from our assumptions and changes in the number of participating employees. The need to make additional cash contributions may reduce our financial flexibility and increase liquidity risk by reducing the cash available to meet our other obligations, including the payment obligations under our credit facilities and other long-term debt, or other needs of our business.
We could incur substantial losses, including with respect to our own cash and fiduciary cash held on behalf of insurance companies and clients, if one of the financial institutions we use in our operations failed.
We maintain significant cash balances at various US depository institutions that are significantly in excess of the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. We also maintain significant cash balances in foreign financial institutions. A significant portion of this cash is fiduciary cash held on behalf of insurance companies or clients. If one or more of the institutions in which we maintain significant cash balances were to fail, our ability to access these funds might be temporarily or permanently limited, and we could face a material liquidity problem and potentially material financial losses. We would also be liable to claims made by the insurance companies or our clients regarding the fiduciary cash held on their behalf.



19


Willis Group Holdings plc


A downgrade to our corporate credit rating and the credit ratings of our outstanding debt may adversely affect our borrowing costs and financial flexibility and, under certain circumstances, may require us to offer to buy back some of our outstanding debt.
A downgrade in our corporate credit rating or the credit ratings of our debt would increase our borrowing costs including those under our credit facilities, and reduce our financial flexibility. In addition, certain downgrades would trigger a step-up in interest rates under the indentures for our 6.200% senior notes due 2017 and our 7.000% senior notes due 2019, which would increase our interest expense. If we need to raise capital in the future, any credit rating downgrade could negatively affect our financing costs or access to financing sources. This may in turn impact the assumptions when performing our goodwill impairment testing which may reduce the excess of fair value over carrying value of the reporting units.
In addition, under the indenture for our 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and our 6.125% senior notes due 2043, if we experience a ratings decline together with a change of control event, we would be required to offer to purchase our 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and our 6.125% senior notes due 2043 from holders unless we had previously redeemed those notes. We may not have sufficient funds available or access to funding to repurchase tendered notes in that event, which could result in a default under the notes. Any future debt that we incur may contain covenants regarding repurchases in the event of a change of control triggering event.
We are a holding company and, therefore, may not be able to receive dividends or other distributions in needed amounts from our subsidiaries.
Willis Group Holdings is a holding company that conducts no business of its own. We are dependent upon dividends and other payments from our operating subsidiaries to meet our obligations for paying principal and interest on outstanding debt obligations, for paying dividends to shareholders and for corporate expenses. Legal and regulatory restrictions, foreign exchange controls, as well as operating requirements of our subsidiaries, may limit our ability to obtain cash from these subsidiaries. For example, Willis Limited, our UK brokerage subsidiary regulated by the FCA, is currently required to maintain $126 million in unencumbered and available funds, of which at least $79 million must be in cash, for regulatory purposes. In the event our operating subsidiaries are unable to pay dividends and make other payments to Willis Group Holdings, we may not be able to service debt, pay obligations or pay dividends on ordinary shares.
If our goodwill becomes impaired, we may be required to record significant charges to earnings, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings.
We have a substantial amount of goodwill on our balance sheet as a result of acquisitions we have completed. We review goodwill for impairment annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. Application of the impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assignment of assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting units and determination of fair value of each reporting unit. Notwithstanding the fact that we recognized an impairment charge in fiscal year 2012 for our North American reporting unit, the risk remains that a significant deterioration in a key estimate or assumption or a less significant deterioration to a combination of assumptions or the sale of a part of a reporting unit could result in an impairment charge in the future, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings.
For further information on our testing for goodwill impairment, see ‘Critical Accounting Estimates’ under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
International Risks
Our significant non-US operations, particularly our London market operations, expose us to exchange rate fluctuations and various risks that could impact our business.
A significant portion of our operations is conducted outside the United States. Accordingly, we are subject to legal, economic and market risks associated with operating in foreign countries, including devaluations and fluctuations in currency exchange rates; imposition of limitations on conversion of foreign currencies into pounds sterling or dollars or remittance of dividends and other payments by foreign subsidiaries; hyperinflation in certain foreign countries; imposition or increase of investment and other restrictions by foreign governments; and the requirement of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws.
We report our operating results and financial condition in US dollars. Our US operations earn revenue and incur expenses primarily in US dollars. In our London market operations, however, we earn revenue in a number of different currencies, but expenses are almost entirely incurred in pounds sterling. Outside the United States and our London market operations, we

20


Risk factors

predominantly generate revenue and expenses in the local currency. The table gives an approximate analysis of revenues and expenses by currency in 2014.
 
US
Dollars
 
Pounds
Sterling
 Euros 
Other
currencies
Revenues58% 8% 13% 21%
Expenses46% 25% 9% 20%

Because of devaluations and fluctuations in currency exchange rates or the imposition of limitations on conversion of foreign currencies into US dollars, we are subject to currency translation exposure on the profits of our operations, in addition to economic exposure. Furthermore, the mismatch between pounds sterling revenues and expenses, together with any net sterling balance sheet position we hold in our US dollar denominated London market operations, creates an exchange exposure.
For example, as the pound sterling strengthens, the US dollars required to be translated into pounds sterling to cover the net sterling expenses increase, which then causes our results to be negatively impacted. However, any net sterling asset we are holding will be more valuable when translated into US dollars. Given these facts, the strength of the pound sterling relative to the US dollar has in the past had a material negative impact on our reported results. This risk could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flow and results of operations in the future.
Additionally, as at December 31, 2014, we are using the SICAD I rate of approximately 12 Venezuelan Bolivars per US Dollar to report our Venezuelan financial position, following devaluation from the official rate of approximately six Bolivars per US dollar. We cannot predict whether there will be a further devaluation of the Venezuelan currency or whether the use of the SICAD I rate will continue to be supported. As at December 31, 2014 we have approximately $22 million of net monetary assets that are denominated in the Venezuela Bolivar.
Where needed, we deploy a hedging strategy to mitigate part of our operating exposure to exchange rate movements, but such mitigating attempts may not be successful. For more information on this strategy, see Part II Item 8 - 'Note 24 Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities'.
In conducting our businesses around the world, we are subject to political, economic, legal, market, nationalization, operational and other risks that are inherent in operating in many countries.
In conducting our businesses and maintaining and supporting our global operations, we are subject to political, economic, legal, market, nationalization, operational and other risks. Our businesses and operations continue to expand into new regions throughout the world, including emerging markets. The possible effects of economic and financial disruptions throughout the world could have an adverse impact on our businesses. These risks include:
the general economic and political conditions in foreign countries,
the imposition of controls or limitations on the conversion of foreign currencies or remittance of dividends and other payments by foreign subsidiaries;
the imposition of sanctions by both the United States and foreign governments;
imposition of withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments from subsidiaries;
imposition or increase of investment and other restrictions by foreign governments;
the price of commodities, such as oil;
fluctuations in our tax rate;
difficulties in controlling operations and monitoring employees in geographically dispersed and culturally diverse locations;
the practical challenge and costs of complying, or monitoring compliance, with a wide variety of foreign laws (some of which may conflict with US or other sources of law), laws and regulations applicable to insurance brokers and US business operations abroad, including rules relating to the conduct of business, trade sanctions administered by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control, the EU, the UK and the UN, and the requirements of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as well as other anti-bribery and corruption rules and requirements in the countries in which we operate; and

21


Willis Group Holdings plc


the practical challenge and costs of complying with local regulation for our operating subsidiaries across the globe.
Legislative and regulatory action could materially and adversely affect us and our effective tax rate may increase.
There is uncertainty regarding the tax policies of the jurisdictions where we operate (which include the potential legislative actions described below), and our tax rate may increase and any such increase may be material. Additionally, the tax laws of Ireland and other jurisdictions could change in the future, and such changes could cause a material change in our effective tax rate. For example, legislative action may be taken by the US Congress which, if ultimately enacted, could override tax treaties upon which we rely or could broaden the circumstances under which we would be considered a US resident, each of which could materially and adversely affect our effective tax rate and cash tax position. We cannot predict the outcome of any specific legislative proposals. However, if proposals were enacted that had the effect of limiting our ability to take advantage of tax treaties between Ireland and other jurisdictions (including the United States), we could be subjected to increased taxation. In addition, any future amendments to the current income tax treaties between Ireland and other jurisdictions could subject us to increased taxation.
Irish law differs from the laws in effect in the United States and may afford less protection to holders of our securities.
It may not be possible to enforce court judgments obtained in the United States against us in Ireland based on the civil liability provisions of the US federal or state securities laws. In addition, there is some uncertainty as to whether the courts of Ireland would recognize or enforce judgments of US courts obtained against us or our directors or officers based on the civil liabilities provisions of the US federal or state securities laws or hear actions against us or those persons based on those laws. We have been advised that the United States currently does not have a treaty with Ireland providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. Therefore, a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any US federal or state court based on civil liability, whether or not based solely on US federal or state securities laws, would not be directly enforceable in Ireland. While not directly enforceable, it is possible for a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any US federal or state court based on civil liability to be enforced in Ireland through common law rules. However, this process is subject to numerous established principles and would involve the commencement of a new set of proceedings in Ireland to enforce the judgment.
As an Irish company, Willis Group Holdings is currently governed by the Irish Companies Acts 1963-2013. In late 2014, a new Companies Act (the “2014 Act”) was passed by both houses of the Irish parliament and is expected to apply to all companies including Willis Group Holdings from June 1, 2015. In addition to introducing new provisions, the 2014 Act carries over many of the existing rules applicable to Irish companies which differ in some material respects from laws generally applicable to US corporations and shareholders, including, among others, differences relating to interested director and officer transactions and shareholder lawsuits. Likewise, under the current regime and the 2014 Act, the duties of directors and officers of an Irish company generally are owed to the company only. Shareholders of Irish companies generally do not have a personal right of action against directors or officers of the company and may exercise such rights of action on behalf of the Company only in limited circumstances. Accordingly, holders of Willis Group Holdings securities may have more difficulty protecting their interests than would holders of securities of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction of the United States.


Item 1B — Unresolved Staff Comments
The Company had no unresolved comments from the SEC’s staff.

22


Properties

Item 2 — Properties
We own and lease a number of properties for use as offices throughout the world and believe that our properties are generally suitable and adequate for the purposes for which they are used. The principal properties are located in the United Kingdom and the United States. Willis maintains over 3.9 million square feet of space worldwide.

London
In London we occupy a prime site comprising 491,000 square feet spread over a 28-story tower and adjoining 10-story building. We have a 25-year lease on this property which expires June 2032. We sub-let approximately 17,500 square feet of the 28-story tower to a third party. We also sub-let the 10-story adjoining building.

North America
In North America, outside of New York, Chicago and Nashville, we lease approximately 1.41.3 million square feet around 100 locations.

New York
In New York, we occupy 205,000 square feet of office space at One World Financial CenterBrookfield Place under a 20-year lease, expiring September 2026.

Chicago
In Chicago, we occupy 140,000 square feet at the Willis Tower under a lease expiring February 2025. We sub-let approximately 17,000 square feet to a third party.

Nashville
In Nashville, we occupy 160,000170,000 square feet under a lease expiring April 2026.

Rest of World
Outside of North America and London we lease approximately 1.51.4 million square feet of office space in over 200 locations. Two of our properties in Ipswich, United Kingdom have liens on the land and buildings in connection with a revolving credit facility.
Item 3 — Legal Proceedings
Information regardingIn the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to various actual and potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings relating principally to alleged errors and omissions in connection with the placement of insurance and reinsurance. Similar to other corporations, the Company is also subject to a variety of other claims, including those relating to the Company’s employment practices. Some of the claims, lawsuits and other proceedings seek damages in amounts which could, if assessed, be significant.
Errors and omissions claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business are covered in part by professional indemnity or other appropriate insurance. The terms of this insurance vary by policy year and self-insured risks have increased significantly in recent years. Regarding self-insured risks, the Company has established provisions which are believed to be adequate in the light of current information and legal advice, and the Company adjusts such provisions from time to time according to developments.
On the basis of current information, the Company does not expect that the actual claims, lawsuits and other proceedings to which the Company is subject, or potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings relating to matters of which it is aware, will ultimately have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Nonetheless, given the large or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these actions, and the inherent unpredictability of litigation and

23


Willis Group Holdings plc


disputes with insurance companies, it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.
The material actual or potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings, of which the Company is currently aware, are as follows:
Stanford Financial Group Litigation
The Company has been named as a defendant in 13 similar lawsuits relating to the collapse of The Stanford Financial Group (‘Stanford’), for which Willis of Colorado, Inc. acted as broker of record on certain lines of insurance. The complaints in these actions generally allege that the defendants actively and materially aided Stanford’s alleged fraud by providing Stanford with certain letters regarding coverage that they knew would be used to help retain or attract actual or prospective Stanford client investors. The complaints further allege that these letters, which contain statements about Stanford and the insurance policies that the defendants placed for Stanford, contained untruths and omitted material facts and were drafted in this manner to help Stanford promote and sell its allegedly fraudulent certificates of deposit.
The 13 actions are as follows:
Troice, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:9-CV-1274-N, was filed on July 2, 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and a Willis associate, among others. On April 1, 2011, plaintiffs filed the operative Third Amended Class Action Complaint individually and on behalf of a putative, worldwide class of Stanford investors, adding Willis Limited as a defendant and alleging claims under Texas statutory and common law and seeking damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages and costs. On May 2, 2011, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the Third Amended Class Action Complaint, arguing, inter alia, that the plaintiffs’ claims are precluded by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (‘SLUSA’).
On May 10, 2011, the court presiding over the Stanford-related actions in the Northern District of Texas entered an order providing that it would consider the applicability of SLUSA to the Stanford-related actions based on the decision in a separate Stanford action not involving a Willis entity, Roland v. Green, Civil Action No. 3:10-CV-0224-N. On August 31, 2011, the court issued its decision in Roland, dismissing that action with prejudice under SLUSA.
On October 27, 2011, the court in Troice entered an order (i) dismissing with prejudice those claims asserted in the Third Amended Class Action Complaint on a class basis on the grounds set forth in Note 22 ‘Commitmentsthe Roland decision discussed above and Contingencies’(ii) dismissing without prejudice those claims asserted in the Third Amended Class Action Complaint on an individual basis. Also on October 27, 2011, the court entered a final judgment in the action.
On October 28, 2011, the plaintiffs in Troice filed a notice of appeal to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearingU.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Subsequently, Troice, Roland and a third action captioned Troice, et al. v. Proskauer Rose LLP, Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-01600-N, which also was dismissed on the grounds set forth in the Roland decision discussed above and on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, were consolidated for purposes of briefing and oral argument. Following the completion of briefing and oral argument, on March 19, 2012, the Fifth Circuit reversed and remanded the actions. On April 2, 2012, the defendants-appellees filed petitions for rehearing en banc. On April 19, 2012, the petitions for rehearing en banc were denied. On July 18, 2012, defendants-appellees filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court regarding the Fifth Circuit's reversal in Troice. On January 18, 2013, the Supreme Court granted our petition. Opening briefs were filed on May 3, 2013 and the Supreme Court heard oral argument on October 7, 2013. On February 26, 2014, the Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit’s decision.
On March 19, 2014, the plaintiffs in Troice filed a Motion to Defer Resolution of Motions to Dismiss, to Compel Rule 26(f) Conference and For Entry of Scheduling Order. That motion has now been fully briefed by the parties and awaits disposition by the court.
On March 25, 2014, the parties in Troice and the Janvey, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al. action discussed below stipulated to the consolidation of the two actions for pre-trial purposes under Part II, Item 8Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On March 28, 2014, the Court “so ordered” that stipulation and, thus, consolidated Troice and Janvey for pre-trial purposes under Rule 42(a).
On September 16, 2014, the court (a) denied the plaintiffs’ request to defer resolution of the defendants’ motions to dismiss, but granted the plaintiffs’ request to enter a scheduling order; (b) requested the submission of supplemental briefing by all parties on the defendants’ motions to dismiss, which the parties submitted on September 30, 2014; and (c) entered an order

24


Legal proceedings


setting a schedule for briefing and discovery regarding plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, which schedule, among other things, provides for the submission of the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification (following the completion of briefing and discovery) on April 20, 2015.
On December 15, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motions to dismiss. On January 30, 2015, the defendants answered the Third Amended Class Action Complaint.
Ranni v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 9-22085, was filed on July 17, 2009 against Willis Group Holdings plc and Willis of Colorado, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The complaint was filed on behalf of a putative class of Venezuelan and other South American Stanford investors and alleges claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and Rule 10b-5 thereunder) and Florida statutory and common law and seeks damages in an amount to be determined at trial. On October 6, 2009, Ranni was transferred, for consolidation or coordination with other Stanford-related actions (including Troice), to the Northern District of Texas by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the ‘JPML’). The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Ranni. On August 26, 2014, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice.

Canabal, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:9-CV-1474-D, was filed on August 6, 2009 against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate named as a defendant in Troice, among others, also in the Northern District of Texas. The complaint was filed individually and on behalf of a putative class of Venezuelan Stanford investors, alleged claims under Texas statutory and common law and sought damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. On December 18, 2009, the parties in Troice and Canabal stipulated to the consolidation of those actions (under the Troice civil action number), and, on December 31, 2009, the plaintiffs in Canabal filed a notice of dismissal, dismissing the action without prejudice.
Rupert, et al. v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2009C115137, was filed on September 14, 2009 on behalf of 97 Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Bexar County). The complaint alleges claims under the Securities Act of 1933, Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks special, consequential and treble damages of more than $300 million, attorneys’ fees and costs. On October 20, 2009, certain defendants, including Willis of Colorado, Inc., (i) removed Rupert to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this reportrelated action and incorporated herein(iii) moved to stay the action pending a determination by reference.the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On April 1, 2010, the JPML issued a final transfer order for the transfer of Rupert to the Northern District of Texas. On January 24, 2012, the court remanded Rupert to Texas state court (Bexar County), but stayed the action until further order of the court. On August 13, 2012, the plaintiffs filed a motion to lift the stay, which motion was denied by the court on September 16, 2014. On October 10, 2014, the plaintiffs appealed the court’s denial of their motion to lift the stay to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On January 5, 2015, the Fifth Circuit consolidated the appeal with the appeal in the Rishmague, et ano. v. Winter, et al. action discussed below, and the consolidated appeal is currently pending. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Rupert.
Casanova, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:10-CV-1862-O, was filed on September 16, 2010 on behalf of seven Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis Limited, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, also in the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleges claims under Texas statutory and common law and seeks actual damages in excess of $5 million, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Casanova.
Rishmague, et ano. v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2011CI2585, was filed on March 11, 2011 on behalf of two Stanford investors, individually and as representatives of certain trusts, against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc., Willis of Texas, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Bexar County). The complaint alleges claims under Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks special, consequential and treble damages of more than $37 million and attorneys’ fees and costs. On April 11, 2011, certain defendants, including Willis of Colorado, Inc., (i) removed Rishmague to the Western District of Texas, (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this related action and (iii) moved to stay the action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On August 8, 2011, the JPML issued a final transfer order for the transfer of Rishmague to the Northern District of Texas, where it is currently pending. On August 13, 2012, the plaintiffs joined with the plaintiffs in the Rupert action in their motion to lift the court’s stay of the Rupert action. On September 9, 2014, the court remanded Rishmague to Texas state court (Bexar County), but stayed the action until further order of the court and denied the plaintiffs’ motion to lift the stay. On October 10, 2014, the plaintiffs appealed the court’s denial of their motion to lift the stay to the Fifth Circuit. On January 5, 2015,

25


Willis Group Holdings plc


the Fifth Circuit consolidated the appeal with the appeal in the Rupert action, and the consolidated appeal is currently pending. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Rishmague.
MacArthur v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2013-07840, was filed on February 8, 2013 on behalf of two Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc., Willis of Texas, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Harris County). The complaint alleges claims under Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks actual, special, consequential and treble damages of approximately $4 million and attorneys' fees and costs. On March 29, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and Willis of Texas, Inc. (i) removed MacArthur to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas and (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this related action. On April 2, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and Willis of Texas, Inc. filed a motion in the Southern District of Texas to stay the action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. Also on April 2, 2013, the court presiding over MacArthur in the Southern District of Texas transferred the action to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On September 29, 2014, the parties stipulated to the remand (to Texas state court (Harris County)) and stay of MacArthur until further order of the court (in accordance with the court’s September 9, 2014 decision in Rishmague (discussed above)), which stipulation was “so ordered” by the court on October 14, 2014. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in MacArthur.
Florida suits: On February 14, 2013, five lawsuits were filed against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis Limited and Willis of Colorado, Inc. in Florida state court (Miami-Dade County) alleging violations of Florida common law. The five suits are: (1) Barbar, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05666CA27, filed on behalf of 35 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $30 million; (2) deGadala-Maria, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05669CA30, filed on behalf of 64 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $83.5 million; (3) Ranni, et ano. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05673CA06, filed on behalf of two Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $3 million; (4) Tisminesky, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05676CA09, filed on behalf of 11 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $6.5 million; and (5) Zacarias, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05678CA11, filed on behalf of 10 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $12.5 million. On June 3, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. removed all five cases to the Southern District of Florida and, on June 4, 2013, notified the JPML of the pendency of these related actions. On June 10, 2013, the court in Tisminesky issued an order sua sponte staying and administratively closing that action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation and coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On June 11, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. moved to stay the other four actions pending the JPML's transfer decision. On June 20, 2013, the JPML issued a conditional transfer order for the transfer of the five actions to the Northern District of Texas, the transmittal of which was stayed for seven days to allow for any opposition to be filed. On June 28, 2013, with no opposition having been filed, the JPML lifted the stay, enabling the transfer to go forward. On September 30, 2014, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to remand in Zacarias, and, on October 3, 2014, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motions to remand in Tisminesky and de Gadala Maria. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaints in these actions.
Janvey, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:13-CV-03980-D, was filed on October 1, 2013 also in the Northern District of Texas against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis Limited, Willis North America Inc., Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate. The complaint was filed (i) by Ralph S. Janvey, in his capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver for the Stanford Receivership Estate, and the Official Stanford Investors Committee (the ‘OSIC’) against all defendants and (ii) on behalf of a putative, worldwide class of Stanford investors against Willis North America Inc. Plaintiffs Janvey and the OSIC allege claims under Texas common law and the court’s Amended Order Appointing Receiver, and the putative class plaintiffs allege claims under Texas statutory and common law. Plaintiffs seek actual damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages and costs. On November 15, 2013, plaintiffs filed the operative First Amended Complaint, which added certain defendants unaffiliated with Willis. On February 28, 2014, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint, which motions were granted in part and denied in part by the court on December 5, 2014. On December 22, 2014, Willis filed a motion to amend the court’s December 5 order to certify an interlocutory appeal to the Fifth Circuit, and, on December 23, 2014, Willis filed a motion to amend and, to the extent necessary, reconsider the court’s December 5 order. On January 16, 2015, the defendants answered the First Amended Complaint. On January 28, 2015, the court denied Willis’s motion to amend the court’s December 5 order to certify an interlocutory appeal to the Fifth Circuit. Willis’s motion to amend and, to the extent necessary, reconsider the December 5 order remains pending.



26


Legal proceedings


As discussed above, on March 25, 2014, the parties in Troice and Janvey stipulated to the consolidation of the two actions for pre-trial purposes under Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On March 28, 2014, the Court “so ordered” that stipulation and, thus, consolidated Troice and Janvey for pre-trial purposes under Rule 42(a).
Additional actions could be brought in the future by other investors in certificates of deposit issued by Stanford and its affiliates. The Company disputes these allegations and intends to defend itself vigorously against these actions. The outcomes of these actions, however, including any losses or other payments that may occur as a result, cannot be predicted at this time.


Item 4 — Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.


2427


Share data and dividendsWillis Group Holdings plc


Part II
Item 5 —
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Share Data
Our shares have been traded on the New York Stock Exchange (‘NYSE’) under the symbol ‘WSH’ since June 11, 2001. The high and low sale prices of our shares, as reported by the NYSE, are set forth below for the periods indicated.
Price Range
of Shares
Price Range
of Shares
High LowHigh Low
2012: 
  
First Quarter$39.85
 $33.81
Second Quarter$37.38
 $34.24
Third Quarter$37.94
 $34.11
Fourth Quarter$37.62
 $31.98
2013: 
  
 
  
First Quarter$39.50
 $33.89
$39.50
 $33.89
Second Quarter$43.02
 $37.86
$43.02
 $37.86
Third Quarter$45.45
 $40.10
$45.45
 $40.10
Fourth Quarter$47.22
 $42.15
$47.22
 $42.15
2014:    
  
Through February 14, 2014$45.38
 $41.30
First Quarter$45.38
 $40.72
Second Quarter$44.49
 $40.47
Third Quarter$44.59
 $39.81
Fourth Quarter$45.66
 $39.11
2015:   
Through February 20, 2015$48.88
 $42.81
On February 14, 2014,20, 2015, the last reported sale price of our shares as reported by the NYSE was $41.46$47.75 per share. As of February 14, 201420, 2015 there were approximately 1,2421,192 shareholders on record of our shares.
Dividends
We normally pay dividends on a quarterly basis to shareholders of record on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31. The dividend payment dates and amounts are as follows:
Payment Date$ Per Share$ Per Share
  
January 13, 2012$0.260
April 13, 2012$0.270
July 13, 2012$0.270
October 15, 2012$0.270
January 15, 2013$0.270
$0.270
April 15, 2013$0.280
$0.280
July 15, 2013$0.280
$0.280
October 15, 2013$0.280
$0.280
January 15, 2014$0.280
$0.280
April 15, 2014$0.300
July 15, 2014$0.300
October 15, 2014$0.300
January 15, 2015$0.300

There are no governmental laws, decrees or regulations in Ireland which will restrict the remittance of dividends or other payments to non-resident holders of the Company’s shares.

2528

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

Share data and dividends

In circumstances where one of Ireland’s many exemptions from dividend withholding tax (‘DWT’) does not apply, dividends paid by the Company will be subject to Irish DWT (currently 20 percent). Residents of the USUnited States should be exempt from Irish DWT provided relevant documentation supporting the exemption has been put in place. While the US-Ireland Double Tax Treaty contains provisions reducing the rate of Irish DWT in prescribed circumstances, it should generally be unnecessary for US residents to rely on the provisions of this treaty due to the wide scope of exemptions from Irish DWT available under Irish domestic law. Irish income tax may also arise in respect of dividends paid by the Company. However, US residents entitled to an exemption from Irish DWT generally have no Irish income tax liability on dividends.
With respect to non-corporate US shareholders, certain dividends from a qualified foreign corporation may be subject to reduced rates of taxation. A foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends received from that corporation on shares that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, such as our shares. Non-corporate US shareholders that do not meet a minimum holding period requirement for our shares during which they are not protected from the risk of loss or that elect to treat the dividend income as ‘investment income’ pursuant to section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation regardless of our status as a qualified foreign corporation. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends if the recipient of a dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. This disallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. US shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules given their particular circumstances.
Total Shareholder Return
The following graph demonstrates a five-year comparison of cumulative total returns for the Company, the S&P 500 and a peer group comprised of the Company, Aon Corporation,plc, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., Brown & Brown Inc., and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. The comparison charts the performance of $100 invested in the Company, the S&P 500 and the peer group on December 31, 2008,2009, assuming full dividend reinvestment.



2629

Table of Contents

Share data and dividendsWillis Group Holdings plc


Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the quarter ended December 31, 20132014, no shares were issued by the Company without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The Company is authorized to buy back its ordinary shares, by way of redemption, and will consider whether to do so from time to time based on many factors including market conditions. The Company is authorized to purchase up to one billion shares from time to time in the open market (such open market purchases would be effected as redemptions under Irish law) and it may also redeem its shares through negotiated trades with persons who are not affiliated with the Company as long as the cost of the acquisition of the Company's shares does not exceed $824$611 million.
In the fourth quarter 2014, the Company bought back 244,300 shares at an average price of $40.86 for a total cost of approximately $10 million, on a trade date basis. The Company intends to buy back $200approximately $175 million in shares in 20142015 to offset the increase in shares outstanding resulting from the exercise of employee stock options in 2013.options. The buybacks will be made in the open market or through privately-negotiated transactions, from time to time, depending on market conditions. The share buy back program may be modified, extended or terminated at any time by the Board of Directors.
Period:Total number of shares purchased Average price paid per share Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
        
October 1, 2014 to October 31, 2014244,300
 $40.86
 244,300
 $611,289,766
November 1, 2014 to November 30, 2014
 
 
 
December 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014
 
 
 
        
Total244,300
 

 244,300
  
The information under Part III, Item 12 regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference.




2730

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

Selected Financial Data

Item 6 —Selected Financial Data
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data
The selected consolidated financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and the related notes and Item 7 — ‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’ included elsewhere in this report.
The selected historical consolidated financial data presented below as of and for each of the five years ended December 31, 20132014 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (‘US GAAP’).
Year ended December 31,Year ended December 31,
2013 2012 2011 2010 20092014 2013 2012 2011 2010
(millions, except per share data)(millions, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Total revenues$3,655
 $3,480
 $3,447
 $3,332
 $3,253
$3,802
 $3,655
 $3,480
 $3,447
 $3,332
Goodwill impairment charge
 (492) 
 
 

 
 (492) 
 
Operating income (loss)685
 (209) 566
 753
 690
647
 663
 (225) 571
 789
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and interest in earnings of associates499
 (337) 239
 587
 516
518
 499
 (337) 239
 587
Income (loss) from continuing operations377
 (433) 219
 470
 455
373
 377
 (433) 219
 470
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 1
 
 4

 
 
 1
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings$365
 $(446) $204
 $455
 $438
$362
 $365
 $(446) $204
 $455
Earnings per share on continuing operations — basic2.07
 (2.58) 1.17
 2.68
 2.58
2.03
 2.07
 (2.58) 1.17
 2.68
Earnings per share on continuing operations — diluted2.04
 (2.58) 1.15
 2.66
 2.57
2.00
 2.04
 (2.58) 1.15
 2.66
Average number of shares outstanding 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
— basic176
 173
 173
 170
 168
178
 176
 173
 173
 170
— diluted179
 173

176
 171
 169
181
 179

173
 176
 171
Balance Sheet Data (as of year end) 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Goodwill$2,838
 $2,827
 $3,295
 $3,294
 $3,277
$2,937
 $2,838
 $2,827
 $3,295
 $3,294
Other intangible assets, net353
 385
 420
 492
 572
450
 353
 385
 420
 492
Total assets (i)
14,800
 15,112
 15,728
 15,850
 15,625
15,435
 14,800
 15,112
 15,728
 15,850
Total equity2,243
 1,725
 2,517
 2,608
 2,229
2,007
 2,243
 1,725
 2,517
 2,608
Long-term debt2,311
 2,338
 2,354
 2,157
 2,165
2,142
 2,311
 2,338
 2,354
 2,157
Shares and additional paid-in capital1,316
 1,125
 1,073
 985
 918
1,524
 1,316
 1,125
 1,073
 985
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity2,215
 1,699
 2,486
 2,577
 2,180
1,985
 2,215
 1,699
 2,486
 2,577
Other Financial Data 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Capital expenditures (excluding capital leases)$105
 $133
 $111
 $83
 $96
$110
 $105
 $133
 $111
 $83
Cash dividends declared per share1.12
 1.08
 1.04
 1.04
 1.04
1.20
 1.12
 1.08
 1.04
 1.04
_________________

(i) 
The Company collects premiums from insureds and, after deducting its commissions, remits the premiums to the respective insurers; the Company also collects claims or refunds from insurers which it then remits to insureds. Uncollected premiums from insureds and uncollected claims or refunds from insurers (‘fiduciary receivables’) are recorded as fiduciary assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Unremitted insurance premiums, claims or refunds (‘fiduciary funds’) are also recorded within fiduciary assets.

2831

Table of Contents

Business discussionWillis Group Holdings plc


Item 7 —Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion includes references to non-GAAP financial measures as defined inRegulation G of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission ('SEC'(‘SEC’). Wepresent such non-GAAP financial measures, specifically underlying and organic growth in commissionsand fees, adjusted operating margin, adjusted operating income, adjusted net incomefrom continuing operations and adjusted earnings per diluted share from continuingoperations,non-GAAP financial measures, as we believe such information is of interest to the investment communitybecause it provides additional meaningful methods of evaluating certain aspects ofthe Company'sCompany’s operating performance from period to period on a basis that may not beotherwise apparent on a GAAP basis. Organic growthbasis, and these provide a measure against which our businesses may be assessed in commissionsthe future.
Underlying total revenues, underlying total expenses, underlying salaries and fees excludesbenefits, underlying other operating expenses, underlying operating income, underlying operating margin, underlying EBITDA, underlying net income and underlying earnings per diluted share (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "underlying measures") are calculated by excluding the impact of acquisitionscertain items and disposals, period over period movements in foreign currency, , andinvestment and other income from growth in revenues.Adjusted operating income, adjusted operating margin, adjusted net income from continuing operations andadjusted earnings per diluted share from continuing operations are calculated byexcluding the impact of certain specified items from operating income, net income or loss from continuingoperations, and earnings per diluted share from continuing operations, respectively, the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Organic commissions and fees, total revenues, organic total expenses, organic salaries and benefits, organic other operating expenses, organic operating income, organic operating margin and organic EBITDA (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "organic measures") further adjust underlying measures to exclude the twelve month impact from acquisitions and disposals from the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Our methods of calculating these measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited. These financial measures should be viewed in addition to, not in lieu of, the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20132014.

This discussion includes forward-looking statements, including under the headings 'Executive Summary', 'Liquidity and Capital Resources', and 'Critical Accounting Estimates' and 'Contractual Obligations'. Please see 'Forward-Looking Statements' for certain cautionary information regarding forward-looking statements and a list of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted in those statements.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Business Overview

We provide a broad range of insurance broking, risk management, and consulting services to our clients worldwide and organizeduring the period organized our business into three segments: Global, North America, and International.
For additional information regarding our business, see the more detailed discussion under Part I, Item 1 - 'Business' of this Form 10-K.

Our Global business provides specialist brokerage and consulting services to clients worldwide arising from specific industries and activities including Aerospace; Energy; Marine; Construction, Property and Casualty; Financial and Executive Risks; Financial Solutions; Faber Global; Fine Art, Jewelry and Specie; Special Contingency Risks; Hughes-Gibbs; Willis Capital Markets & Advisory; Placement and Reinsurance.
North America and International comprise: our retail operations and provide services to small, medium and large corporations; and the Human Capital practice, our largest product-based practice group, provides health, welfare and human resources consulting and brokerage services.
In our capacity as advisor and insurance broker, we act as an intermediary between our clients and insurance carriers by advising our clients on their risk management requirements, helping clients determine the best means of managing risk, and negotiating and placing insurance with insurance carriers through our global distribution network.
We derive most of our revenues from commissions and fees for brokerage and consulting services and do not determine the insurance premiums on which our commissions are generally based. Commission levels generally follow the same trend as premium levels as they are derived from a percentage of the premiums paid by the insureds. Fluctuations in these premiums charged by the insurance carriers can therefore have a direct and potentially material impact on our results of operations.Market Conditions
Due to the cyclical nature of the insurance market and the impact of other market conditions on insurance premiums, commission revenues may vary widely between accounting periods. A period of low or declining premium rates, generally known as a 'soft'‘soft’ or 'softening'‘softening’ market, generally leads to downward pressure on commission revenues and can have a material adverse impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. A 'hard'‘hard’ or 'firming'‘firming’ market, during which premium rates rise, generally has a favorable impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. Rates, however, vary by geography, industry and client segment. As a result and due to the global and diverse nature of our business, we view rates holistically.


29


Willis Group Holdings plc


Market Conditionsin the aggregate.

Market conditions in our industry are generally defined by factors such as the strength of the economies in the various geographic regions in which we serve around the world, insurance rate movements, and insurance and reinsurance buying patterns of our clients.
The industry and market in general throughout 2011 and early 2012 experienced modest increase in catastrophe-exposed property insurance and reinsurance pricing levels driven by significant catastrophe losses including the Japanese earthquake and tsunami, the New Zealand earthquake and, late in 2012, Super Storm Sandy. Also during that period, direct carriers in North America, facing persistent low investment returns, started to modestly raise rates in certain products. This firming rate environment, however, generally did not extend beyond North America to impact our International retail business.
Early in 2013, the reinsurance market was generally flat,flat; however, as the year progressed we saw changing market sentiment driven by changes in the sources of capital and increases in capital supply in the reinsurance market, most notably within the North American catastrophe-exposed property market. The influx of third partythird-party capital coupled with changes to reinsurance buying patterns and regulatory complexity is leading to growing complexity in the reinsurance market and a softening of prices.

This pattern
32


Business discussion

In 2014 we noted a continuation of this trend, and market entrants coupled with strong underwriting performance in 2013, due to the absencesigns of natural and man-made catastrophes, means that the trend of priceacceleration, towards softening is continuing as we enter 2014 and is extending to other linesreinsurance rates across almost all classes of business not just catastrophe exposed property.
The outlookand geographies as positive 2013 results for our business, operating resultstraditional reinsurers exacerbated the growing supply of capital from third-party investors. In addition, for primary insurance companies, the ability to recognize primary rate increases may be coming to an end and financial condition continues to be challenging due to the global economic condition. Thereconsequently, rate flattening and even rate reductions are signs of improving conditions bothseen in the US, and within certain European Union countries, including a return to sustained GDP growth in certain countries. If conditions in the Global economy, including the US, the UK and the Eurozone deteriorate, there will likely be a negative effectmany territories on our business as well as the businesses of our clients.primary insurance classes.
In the face of this challenging economic environment, we have adopted a strategy toto: (1) invest selectively in growth areas, defined by geography, industry sector, and client segment and to(2) better aligncoordinate our three segmentsbusiness so as to among other things, bring our clients greater access to the Company's specialty areas and analytical capabilities.capabilities, among other things. Our growth strategy also involves increasing our investment in, and deployment of, our analytical capabilities.

Financial Performance
Consolidated Financial PerformanceThe following is a summary of our 2014 GAAP financial results:
2013 compared to 2012

Total revenues in 2013of $3,655$3,802 million increased by $175$147 million,, or 5.04.0 percent, compared to 2012. over the prior year. This growth included organic growth$134 million increase in commissions and fees, led by our International segment which reported high single digit growth, and a net $26 million increase from the impact of 4.9acquisitions and disposals. Foreign exchange negatively impacted total revenues by $30 million.
Total operating expenses of $3,155 million increased by $163 million, or 5.4 percent, and 0.5 percent over the prior year. This growth included $36 million of restructuring costs related to the Operational Improvement Program, a $34 million net increase in expenses from acquisitions and disposals. Organic growthdisposals, and $6 million adverse foreign currency movements. The remaining increase was achieved in all three of our operating segments led by Global with 5.6 percent. Our North America operations reported organic growth of 4.9 percent, which included a $5 million positive revenue recognition adjustment. Our International operations achieved organic growth of 4.1 percent despite recognizing a $15 million negative revenue recognition adjustment. Foreign currency movements had a negative $12 million or 0.3 percent impact on commissions and fees in 2013.

Total expenses for 2013 of $2,970 million were $719 million or 19.5 percent lower comparedprimarily due to 2012.
The 2013 total expenses included $46 million related to the Expense Reduction Initiative (see 'Expense Reduction Initiative' section below) conducted earlier in the year. The 2012 total expenses included a $492 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge related to our North American reporting unit, a $200 million write-off of unamortized cash retention awards following the decision to eliminate the repayment requirement of past awards, and a $252 million expense related to the accrual for 2012 cash bonuses paid in 2013. Foreign currency movements had a $9 million positive impact on total expenses in 2013.
Excluding the items noted above, total expenses in 2013 were $188 million, or 6.8 percent, higher than in 2012. The largest driver of this was the increase in salaries and benefits due to annual salaryexpense driven by increased headcount, pay reviews, and higher incentive charges, for share-based compensation and new hires and investments in targeted businesses and geographies. In addition to these, we recorded higher incentives as a result of growth in commissions and fees, and the change in remuneration policy. Other operating expenses alsoalong with increased due to travel, accommodation and client entertaining costsentertainment expenses, and systems costs.
Operating margin decreased 110 basis points to support business development, marketing costs, strategic review charges and higher professional fees.

30

Table of Contents17.0 percent from 18.1 percent in the prior year.

Business discussion

The Company incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt of $60 million from the refinancing that was completed during 2013.
The tax rate for the full year was affected by an incremental US tax expense of $9 million recorded after taking into account the impact of adjustments to the valuation allowance placed against our US deferred tax assets.
Earnings from associates were down $5 million, net of tax, mainly due to costs of a reorganization program in our principal associate, Gras Savoye.
Net income attributable to Willis shareholdersGroup Holdings was $362 million, or $2.00 per diluted share, a decrease of $3 million, or 0.8 percent, from continuing operations was $$365 million, or $$2.04 per diluted share, in 2013 compared to.
Cash flows from operating activities were $477 million in 2014, a lossdecrease of $$84 million, or 15.0 percent from 446$561 million or $2.58 per diluted share in 20122013. The $811
Our non-GAAP financial measures were as follows:
Underlying total revenues of $3,802 million increased $177 million, or 4.9 percent, over the prior year. Excluding the net $26 million increase in net income compared to 2012 can be attributed primarily tofrom acquisitions and disposals, organic total revenues increased $151 million, or 4.2 percent over the non-recurrence of the 2012 items discussed above andprior year. This growth inwas driven by high commissions and fees partially offsetgrowth in our International segment, supported by growth in expenses.
2012 compared to 2011

Total revenues in 2012 of $3,480 million increased by $33 million, or 1.0 percent, compared to 2011, including a $59 million or 1.7 percent negative impact from movements in foreign exchange. Organic growth in commissions and fees of 3.1 percent was driven by our International and Global operations. OurWillis North America operations reported a decline of 0.6 percent in commissions and fees, dueGlobal. In addition to lower revenues generated by Loan Protector, a specialty business acquired as part of the HRH business, and the continued adverse impact of difficult economic conditions in the US.

Total expenses in 2012 of $3,689this, Other income increased $12 million increased $808 million compared to 2011, primarily due to the recognition of a $492 million non-cash goodwill impairment chargesettlement related to our North American reporting unit, a $200specialty book of business within Global.
Underlying total expenses of $3,119 million write-off of unamortized cash retention awards followingincreased $168 million, or 5.7 percent, over the decision to eliminateprior year. Excluding the repayment requirement of past awards,net $34 million increase from acquisitions and a $252 million expense related to the accrual for 2012 cash bonuses paid in 2013.

Excluding these expenses,disposals, organic total operating expenses declined $136of $3,066 million increased $134 million, or 4.74.6 percent, principallyover the prior year. This was primarily due to $180 million expense recognized in 2011 related to the Operational Review and favorable movements in foreign exchange partially offset by increases in salaryhigher salaries and benefits expenses linked to annualexpense, driven by increased headcount, pay reviews, new hires and investmentshigher incentive charges, along with increased travel, accommodation and entertainment expenses, and systems costs.
The resultant organic operating margin decreased by 20 basis points to 18.2 percent from 18.4 percent in targeted businesses and geographies.the prior year.

Net loss attributableOperational improvement program
In April 2014, the Company announced an operational improvement program that would allow the Company to Willis shareholders from continuing operations was $446 million or a loss of $2.58 per diluted sharecontinue to strengthen its client service, realize operational efficiencies, and invest in 2012 compared to a profit of $203 million or $1.15 per diluted share in 2011. The $649 million decrease in net income compared to 2011 primarily reflects the increase in total expenses described above and the $113 million charge to establish a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in our US operations, partially offset by the non-recurrence of the $131 million post-tax cost in 2011 relating to the make-whole amounts on the repurchase and redemption of $500 million of our senior debt and the write-off of related unamortized debt issuance costs and by the revenue growth achieved during the year. Net income in 2012 was also adversely impacted by a $7 million reduction in interest in earnings of associates, net of tax, mainly due to declining performance in our principal associate, Gras Savoye.

new capabilities for growth.

3133


Willis Group Holdings plc


Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted Net IncomeThe main elements of the program include the following:
movement of more than 3,500 support roles from Continuing Operationshigher cost locations to Willis facilities in lower cost locations, bringing the ratio of employees in higher cost versus lower cost near-shore and Adjusted Earningsoff-shore centers from approximately 80:20 to approximately 60:40;
net workforce reductions in support positions;
lease consolidation in real estate and reductions in ratios of seats per Diluted Share from Continuing Operationsemployee and square footage of floor space per employee; and
Our non-GAAP measures of adjusted operating income, adjusted net income from continuing operationsinformation technology systems simplification and adjusted earnings per diluted share from continuing operations are calculated by excluding the impact of certain items (as detailed below) from operating income (loss), net income (loss) from continuing operations, and earnings per diluted share from continuing operations, respectively, the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

rationalization.
The following itemsprogram began in the second quarter of 2014 and is expected to be complete by the end of 2017. The program is expecting to deliver cumulative cost savings of at least $420 million through 2017 and annual cost savings of approximately $300 million starting in 2018.
Actual cost savings of approximately $11 million were achieved in 2014, the estimated phasing of future cost savings is as follows: at least $60 million in 2015, approximately $135 million in 2016, and approximately $235 million in 2017. The estimated cost savings are excludedbefore any potential reinvestment for future growth.
To achieve these savings, the Company expects to incur cumulative spend, including capital expenditure, amounting to approximately $410 million through the end of 2017. Program spend in 2014 was $36 million, with approximately $130 million expected for 2015 and the balance of approximately $240 million expected to be incurred in 2016 and 2017.
Total spend, actual savings, and timing may vary positively or negatively from operating income (loss)these estimates due to changes in the scope, underlying assumptions, or execution risk of the restructuring plan throughout its duration.
The Company expects that about 70 percent of the annualized 2018 savings would come from role relocation and net income (loss)reduction, and about 30 percent of the savings from continuing operations as applicable:real estate, information technology and other areas.

(i)the additional incentive accrual recognized following the replacement of annual cash retention awards with annual cash bonuses which will not feature a repayment requirement;
(ii)write-off of unamortized cash retention awards following the decision to eliminate the repayment requirement on past awards;

(iii)goodwill impairment charge;

(iv)valuation allowance against deferred tax assets;

(v)write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance and associated legal fees arising in Chicago due to fraudulent overstatement of commissions and fees;

(vi)costs associatedTo assist with the 2011 Operational Review;

(vii)significant legal and regulatory settlements which are managed centrally;

(viii)gains and losses on the disposal of operations;

(ix)insurance recoveries;

(x)make-whole amounts on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs;

(xi)loss and fees related to the extinguishment of debt; and
(xii)costs associated with the Expense Reduction Initiative.

We believe that excluding these items, as applicable, from operating income (loss), net income (loss) from continuing operations and earnings per diluted share from continuing operations provides a more complete and consistent comparative analysis of our results of operations. We use these and other measures to establish Group performance targets and evaluate the performance of our operations.

As set out in the tables below, adjusted operating margin at 20.0 percent in 2013, was down 160 basis points compared to 2012, while adjusted net income from continuing operations at $472 million was $18 million higher than in 2012. Adjusted earnings per diluted share from continuing operations was $2.64 in 2013, compared to $2.58 in 2012.

32


Business discussion

A reconciliation of reported operating income or loss, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to adjusted operating income is as follows (in millions, except percentages):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
Operating income (loss), GAAP basis$685
 $(209) $566
Excluding:     
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy (a)

 252
 
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards (b)

 200
 
Goodwill impairment charge (c)

 492
 
India JV settlement (d)

 11
 
Insurance recovery (e)

 (10) 
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance (f)

 13
 22
Net (gain) loss on disposal of operations(2) 3
 (4)
2011 Operational Review (g)

 
 180
FSA regulatory settlement (h)

 
 11
Expense Reduction Initiative (i)
46
 
 
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt1
 
 
Adjusted operating income$730
 $752
 $775
Operating margin, GAAP basis, or operating income (loss) as a percentage of total revenues18.7% (6.0)% 16.4%
Adjusted operating margin, or adjusted operating income as a percentage of total revenues20.0% 21.6 % 22.5%
_________________
(a)
Additional incentive accrual recognized following the replacement of annual cash retention awards with annual cash bonuses which will not feature a repayment requirement.
(b)
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards following the decision to eliminate the repayment requirement on past awards.
(c)
Non-cash charge recognized related to the impairment of the carrying value of the North America reporting unit's goodwill.
(d)
$11 million settlement with former partners related to the termination of a joint venture arrangement in India. In addition, a $1 million loss on disposal of operations was recorded related to the termination.
(e)
Insurance recovery related to the previously disclosed fraudulent activity in Chicago. See 'Correction of Commissions and Fees Overstatement Relating to 2011 and Prior Periods', below.
(f)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance relating to periods prior to January 1, 2011, see 'Correction of Commissions and Fees Overstatement Relating to 2011 and Prior Periods', below.
(g)
Charge relating to the 2011 Operational Review, including $98 million of severance costs related to the elimination of approximately 1,200 positions for the full year 2011.
(h)
Regulatory settlement with the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA), now the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
(i)
Charge related to the assessment of the Company's organizational design. See 'Expense Reduction Initiative' section below.







33


Willis Group Holdings plc


A reconciliation of reported net income or loss from continuing operations and reported earnings per diluted share from continuing operations, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to adjusted net income from continuing operations and adjusted earnings per diluted share from continuing operations is as follows (in millions, except per share data):
 
Year Ended
December 31,
 
Per diluted share
Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011
Net income (loss) from continuing operations, GAAP basis$365
 $(446) $203
 $2.04
 $(2.58) $1.15
Excluding:           
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy, net of tax ($nil, $77, $nil) (a)

 175
 
 
 0.99
 
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards, net of tax ($nil, $62, $nil) (b)

 138
 
 
 0.78
 
Goodwill impairment charge, net of tax ($nil, $34, $nil) (c)

 458
 
 
 2.60
 
India JV settlement, net of tax ($nil, $nil, $nil) (d)

 11
 
 
 0.06
 
Insurance recovery, net of tax ($nil, $4, $nil) (e)

 (6) 
 
 (0.03) 
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance, net of tax ($nil, $5, $9) (f)

 8
 13
 
 0.05
 0.08
Net (gain) loss on disposal of operations, net of tax ($1, $nil, $nil)(1) 3
 (4) (0.01) 0.02
 (0.02)
2011 Operational Review, net of tax ($nil, $nil, $52) (g)

 
 128
 
 
 0.73
FSA regulatory settlement, net of tax ($nil, $nil, $nil) (h)

 
 11
 
 
 0.06
Make-whole amounts on repurchase and redemption of Senior Notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs, net of tax ($nil, $nil, $50)
 
 131
 
 
 0.74
Expense Reduction Initiative, net of tax ($8, $nil, $nil) (i)
38
 
 
 0.21
 
 
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt, net of tax ($nil, $nil, $nil)1
 
 
 0.01
 
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax ($nil, $nil, $nil)60
 
 
 0.34
 
 
Impact of US valuation allowance9
 113
 
 0.05
 0.64
 
Dilutive impact of potentially issuable shares (j)

 
 
 
 0.05
 
Adjusted net income from continuing operations$472
 $454
 $482
 $2.64
 $2.58
 $2.74
Average diluted shares outstanding, GAAP basis (j)
179
 173
 176
      
_________________

(a)
Additional incentive accrual recognized following the replacement of annual cash retention awards with annual cash bonuses which will not feature a repayment requirement.
(b)
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor following the decision to eliminate the repayment requirement on past awards.
(c)
Non-cash charge recognized related to the impairment of the carrying value of the North America reporting unit's goodwill.
(d)
$11 million settlement with former partners related to the termination of a joint venture arrangement in India. In addition, a $1 million loss on disposal of operations was recorded related to the termination.
(e)
Insurance recovery related to the previously disclosed fraudulent activity in Chicago. See 'Correction of Commissions and Fees Overstatement Relating to 2011 and Prior Periods', below.
(f)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance relating to periods prior to January 1, 2011, see 'Correction of Commissions and Fees Overstatement Relating to 2011 and Prior Periods', below.
(g)
Charge relating to the 2011 Operational Review, including $98 million pre-tax of severance costs related to the elimination of approximately 1,200 positions for the full year 2011.
(h)
Regulatory settlement with the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA), now the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
(i)
Charge related to the assessment of the Company's organizational design. See 'Expense Reduction Initiative' section below.
(j)
Potentially issuable shares were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share, GAAP basis, because the Company's net loss from continuing operations rendered their impact anti-dilutive.


34


Business discussion

Goodwill Impairment
Our annual goodwill impairment analysis is performed each year at October 1. At October 1, 2013 our analysis showed the estimated fair value of each reporting unit was in excesseffectiveness of the carrying value,program the Company will provide the following metrics annually:
ratio of full time employees (FTEs) in higher cost geographies to lower cost near-shore and therefore did not resultoff-shore centers as at December 31, 2014 was 78:22 (March 31, 2014 ratio was 80:20);
indexed ratio of square footage of real estate per FTE as at December 31, 2014 was 98 (March 31, 2014 ratio of square footage of real estate per FTE = 100); and
indexed ratio of desks per FTE as at December 31, 2014 was 99 (March 31, 2014 ratio of desks per FTE = 100).
The restructuring costs of $36 million related to the Operational Improvement Program incurred in an impairment charge (2012: $492 million; 2011: $nil).2014 included:
In 2012 an impairment charge for$3 million of termination benefits in the North America reporting unit was required and amountedsegment relating to $492 million. There was no impairment for the Global and International reporting units, as the fair valueselimination of these units were significantly in excess51 positions across a number of their carrying value.North America retail locations;
Correction of Commissions and Fees Overstatement Relating to 2011 and Prior Periods
As previously disclosed, in early 2012 we identified through our internal financial control process and a subsequent internal investigation an uncollectible accounts receivable balance of approximately $40 million in Chicago from the fraudulent overstatement of Commissions and fees from the years 2005 to 2011.
We concluded that the total $40 million of overstatement did not materially affect our previously issued financial statements for any of the prior periods and we corrected the misstatement by recognizing a charge to Other operating expenses to write off the uncollectible receivable (a) of $13 million (including legal expenses) in the first quarter of 2012 and (b) of $22$5 million in the fourth quarterInternational segment, of 2011. Inwhich approximately $3 million was termination benefits related to the fourth quarter 2011 we also reversed a $6 million balanceelimination of Commissions81 positions across the International network and fees which had been recorded during 2011 andapproximately $2 million of Salaries and benefits expense representing an over-accrual of production bonuses relatingspent on professional services to support the overstated revenue. During 2012, we recorded within Other operating expenses a $10 million insurance settlement from insurers in respect of our claim under Group insurance policies, for compensation paid out in the years 2005 to 2010 on the fraudulently overstated revenues discussed above.program;
The employees in question, who have been terminated, were not members of Willis executive management nor did they play a significant role in internal control over financial reporting. Based on the results of our investigation, which has now been completed, we do not believe that any client or carrier funds were misappropriated or that any other business units were affected.
We have enhanced our internal controls in relation to the business unit in question, including enhanced procedures over receipt of checks and application of cash, increased segregation of duties between the operating unit and the accounting and settlement function, and additional central sign off requirement on revenue recognition.
Expense Reduction Initiative
The Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $46$11 million in the first quarterGlobal segment, including $10 million of 2013termination benefits related to the previously announced assessmentelimination of approximately 181 positions from the Company's organizational design. In connection with this assessment, we incurred the following pre-tax charges:
$29Willis Insurance UK and UK Reinsurance divisions, in addition to approximately $1 million of severance and other staffprofessional fees related costs towards the elimination of 207 positions;to a study on process improvement; and
$17 million in Corporate and other, including approximately $16 million of Other operating expenses and Depreciation resulting from the rationalization of property and systems.
The Company did not incur any further chargesprofessional fees, primarily related to this review.
The actions taken resulted in total cost savings ofadvisory services, and approximately $20$1 million exclusive ofrelated to system implementation and other core resources supporting the costs incurred in 2013. It is also anticipated that we will achieve prospective annualized cost savings of approximately $25 million to $30 million.program.
Cash Retention Awards
For the past several years, certain cash retention awards under the Company's annual incentive programs included a feature which required the recipient to repay a proportionate amount of the annual award if the employee voluntarily left the Company before a specified date, which was generally three years following the award. As previously disclosed, the Company made the cash payment to the recipient in the year of grant and recognized the payment in expense ratably over the period it was subject to repayment, beginning in the quarter in which the award was made. The unamortized portion of cash retention awards was recorded within 'other current assets' and 'other non-current assets' in the consolidated balance sheets.
The following table sets out the amount of cash retention awards made and the related amortization of those awards for the three years ended December 31, 2013.

35


Willis Group Holdings plc


  Years ended December 31,
  2013 2012 2011
  (millions)
Cash retention awards made $12
 $221
 $210
Amortization of cash retention awards included in salaries and benefits 6
 216
 185

In December 2012, the Company decided to eliminate the repayment requirement from past annual cash retention awards and, as a result, recognized a non-cash, pre-tax charge of $200 million which represents the write-off of the unamortized balance of past awards at that date.
There were, however, a number of off-cycle awards with a fixed period guarantee attached, for which we have not waived the repayment requirement. The unamortized portion of these awards amounted to $15 million at December 31, 2013 (2012: $9 million; 2011: $196 million).
In addition, in 2012, the Company replaced annual cash retention awards with annual cash bonuses which did not include a repayment requirement. As at December 31, 2012, the Company had accrued $252 million for these bonuses.
Pension Expense
We recorded a net periodic benefit income on our UK defined benefit pension plan in 2013 of $5 million (2012: $5 million; 2011: cost of $6 million). On our US defined benefit pension plan, we recorded a net periodic benefit income of $4 million in 2013 (2012: cost of $3 million; 2011: $nil). On our other defined benefit pension plans, we recorded a net pension cost of $5 million in 2013 (2012: $4 million; 2011: $5 million).
The periodic benefit income on the UK plan in 2013 is flat compared to 2012 as higher asset returns were offset by higher amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses and increased service costs.
The movement to $5 million income on the UK plan in 2012 from a $6 million cost in 2011 was primarily due to higher asset returns partially offset by higher amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses and increased interest cost.
On the US plan, the movement to a $4 million income in 2013 from a $3 million cost in 2012 was primarily due to higher asset returns.
The 2012 US pension cost was $3 million higher compared with 2011 was primarily due to an increase in amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses partially offset by higher asset returns.

See 'Contractual Obligations' below for further information on our obligations relating to our pension plans.
Acquisitions and Disposals
In first quarter 2014January, 2015 the Company agreedreached an agreement to acquire Charles Monat Limited, a market-leading life insurance solutions adviser to high net worth clients.majority interest in Miller Insurance Services LLP, a leading London-based wholesale specialist. The acquisition represents a key enhancement to our expanding Global Wealth Solutions practice, particularly in Asia, however completion of the transaction is currently subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approval.approval and is expected to close in the second quarter of 2015.
During first quarterthe year ended December 31, 2014 we made the Company disposed of Insurance Noodle,following material acquisitions in line with our strategy to invest in targeted acquisitions with a small online wholesale business in Willis North America, to Insureon.
In fourth quarter 2013 the Company acquired the employee benefits consulting division of Capital Strategies Group, Inc. based in Birmingham, Alabama. We disposed of the tradefocus on earnings accretion, competitive position, and assets associated with Willis of Northern New England to a small Maine-based broker specializing in attorneys, not-for-profit organizations, hospitals and contractors.
In third quarter 2013, the Company disposed of the trade and assets associated with CBT, our book of small commercial clients in the UK, to Chesham Insurance Brokers.
In second quarter 2013, the Company acquired 100 percent of PPH Limited and its subsidiary Prime Professions Limited (together referred to as Prime Professions), a leading UK based professional indemnity insurance broker, at a cost of $29 million.
In first quarter 2013, the Company acquired 100 percent of CBC Broker Srl, an Italian broker, at a cost of $1 million.

fit.

3634


Business discussion

Management StructureIn the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company acquired 75.8 percent of Max Matthiessen Holding AB and subsidiaries (collectively referred to as Max Matthiessen), a leading employee benefits adviser in Sweden, for cash consideration of $204 million.
In the second quarter of 2014, the Company acquired 100 percent of Charles Monat Limited and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as Charles Monat), a life insurance solutions adviser to high net worth clients based in Hong Kong, for cash consideration of $59 million. Additional consideration estimated at $29 million is payable in annual installments over the next five years, based on a multiple of EBITDA of the entities acquired, during the period from May 25, 2014 until September 2, 2019. This consideration has been assessed to have a fair value of $12 million at the date of acquisition.
During first quarter 2014 we announced changes to the structurehave also disposed of our UK-based insurance operations, combining our Global Specialty insurancea number of low growth offices and business with the Willis UK retail business to create a market leading client proposition. Following this change, effective January 1, 2014, UK retail, previously reported as part of our International reporting segment will be reported in our Global reporting segment.
In addition, effective January 1, 2014 Mexico which was previously reported withinfrom our North America reporting segment, will be reported inunit that no longer align strategically with the rest of the North America segment.

Non-GAAP financial measures
During 2014, we made changes to the non-GAAP financial measures that we use to provide additional meaningful methods of evaluating the Company’s operating performance replacing our International reporting segment, Placement which was previously reported as partadjusted measures with new underlying measures and introduced new organic non-GAAP financial measures.
Previously we excluded certain specified items from total expenses, salaries and benefits, other operating expenses, operating margin, operating income, net income (loss) and earnings per share to calculate adjusted total expenses, adjusted salaries and benefits, adjusted other operating expenses, adjusted operating margin, adjusted operating income, adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share.
In addition to these certain specified items, we exclude the period-over-period foreign currency movements to calculate our underlying non-GAAP financial measures and further exclude the twelve month impact from acquisitions and disposals to calculate our organic non-GAAP financial measures.
We believe that the understanding of the Company's performance and comparative analysis of our Global reporting segment will be reported within Corporateresults is enhanced by our disclosure of the following non-GAAP financial measures. We use these and other measures to establish Group performance targets and our US Captive consulting business and Facultative reinsurance businesses, which were previously reported as partevaluate the performance of our North America reporting segment willoperations.
Our method for calculating these measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be reported in our Global reporting segment.limited.
Underlying measures
Our underlying non-GAAP measures are calculated by excluding certain items (as detailed below) from total revenues, total expenses, salaries and benefits, other operating expenses, operating income, net income (loss), and earnings per diluted share, respectively, the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Additionally, prior year total revenues, total expenses and net income (loss) and diluted earnings per share have been rebased to current period exchange rates to eliminate the impact of year over year foreign exchange movements.
The following items have been excluded from total revenues, total expenses, salaries and benefits, other operating expenses, operating income and net income (loss) as applicable:
(i)restructuring charges relating the Operational Improvement Program;
(ii)costs associated with the 2013 Expense Reduction Initiative;
(iii)fees related to the extinguishment of debt;
(iv)the additional incentive accrual recognized following the replacement of annual cash retention awards with annual cash bonuses which do not feature a repayment requirement;
(v)write-off of unamortized cash retention awards following the decision to eliminate the repayment requirement on past awards;
(vi)India joint venture settlement;
(vii)goodwill impairment charge;

35


Willis Group Holdings plc


(viii)valuation allowance against deferred tax assets;
(ix)write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance and associated legal fees arising in Chicago due to fraudulent overstatement of commissions and fees;
(x)insurance recoveries related to the fraudulent overstatement of commissions and fees;
(xi)foreign exchange loss from the devaluation of the Venezuelan currency; and
(xii)gains and losses on the disposal of operations.

Organic measures

Our organic non-GAAP measures are calculated by excluding the twelve month impact from acquisitions and disposals, together with the impact of certain items, including foreign currency, that are discussed above, from total revenues, total expenses, salaries and benefits, other operating expenses, operating income, respectively, the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

A reconciliation of reported total expenses, salaries and benefits and other operating expense, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying and organic total expenses, underlying and organic salaries and benefits and underlying and organic other operating expenses is as follows (in millions, except percentages):
2014 compared to 2013
 Salaries and benefits Other operating expenses Total expenses
 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013
Expenses, GAAP basis$2,314
 $2,207
 $659
 $636
 $3,155
 $2,992
Excluding:           
Restructuring costs
 
 
 
 36
 
Expense Reduction Initiative
 29
 
 12
 
 46
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt
 
 
 1
 
 1
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (3) 
 (2) 
 (6)
Underlying expenses$2,314
 $2,181
 $659
 $625
 $3,119
 $2,951
Less: net expenses from acquisitions and disposals33
 13
 12
 3
 53
 19
Organic expenses$2,281
 $2,168
 $647
 $622
 $3,066
 $2,932

(a)For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


36


Business discussion

A reconciliation of reported total expenses, salaries and benefits and other operating expense, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying and organic total expenses, underlying and organic salaries and benefits and underlying and organic other operating expenses is as follows (in millions, except percentages):
2013 compared to 2012
 Salaries and benefits Other operating expenses Total expenses
 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012
Expenses, GAAP basis$2,207
 $2,475
 $636
 $600
 $2,992
 $3,705
Excluding:      

    
Expense Reduction Initiative29
 
 12
 
 46
 
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt
 
 1
 
 1
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy
 252
 
 
 
 252
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor
 200
 
 
 
 200
Goodwill impairment charge
 
 
 
 
 492
India JV settlement
 
 
 11
 
 11
Insurance recovery
 
 
 (10) 
 (10)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance
 
 
 13
 
 13
Foreign currency movements (a)

 9
 
 
 
 9
Underlying expenses$2,178
 $2,014
 $623
 $586
 $2,945
 $2,738
Less: net expenses from acquisitions and disposals12
 1
 1
 
 14
 1
Organic expenses$2,166
 $2,013
 $622
 $586
 $2,931
 $2,737

(a)For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.

37


Willis Group Holdings plc


Business StrategyA reconciliation of reported total revenues and operating income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to underlying and organic total revenues, and underlying and organic operating income, is as follows (in millions, except percentages):

Today we operate in attractive growth markets with a diversified platform across geographies, industries, segments and lines of business. We aim2014 compared to become the risk advisor, insurance and reinsurance broker of choice globally.

We will achieve this by being completely focused on:

2013
where we compete and that means the areas where we can succeed by:
 2014 2013
Total revenues, GAAP basis$3,802
 $3,655
Excluding:   
Foreign currency movements (a)

 30
Underlying total revenue$3,802
 $3,625
Less: net revenue from acquisitions and disposals56
 30
Organic total revenue$3,746
 $3,595
    
Operating income, GAAP basis$647
 $663
Excluding:   
Restructuring costs36
 
Expense Reduction Initiative
 46
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt
 1
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (36)
Underlying operating income$683
 $674
Less: net operating income from acquisitions and disposals3
 11
Organic operating income$680
 $663
    
Operating margin, GAAP basis, or operating income as a percentage of total revenues17.0% 18.1%
Underlying operating margin, or underlying operating income as a percentage of underlying total revenues18.0% 18.6%
Organic operating margin, or organic operating income as a percentage of organic total revenues18.2% 18.4%

(a)
Geography - we will re-balance our business mix towards faster growing geographies, with both developed and developing marketsFor prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


38


Business discussion

A reconciliation of reported total revenues and operating income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to underlying and organic revenues, and underlying and organic operating income, is as follows (in millions, except percentages):

2013 compared to 2012
 2013 2012
Total revenues, GAAP basis3,655
 3,480
Excluding:   
Foreign currency movements (a)

 13
Underlying total revenue$3,655
 $3,467
Less: net revenue from acquisitions and disposals56
 2
Organic total revenue$3,599
 $3,465
    
Operating income (loss), GAAP basis663
 (225)
Excluding:   
Expense Reduction Initiative46
 
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt1
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy
 252
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor
 200
Goodwill impairment charge
 492
India JV settlement
 11
Insurance recovery
 (10)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance
 13
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (4)
Underlying operating income$710
 $729
Less: net operating income from acquisitions and disposals42
 1
Organic operating income$668
 $728
    
Operating margin, GAAP basis, or operating income as a percentage of total revenues18.1% (6.5)%
Underlying operating margin, or underlying operating income as a percentage of underlying total revenues19.4% 21.0 %
Organic operating margin, or organic operating income as a percentage of organic total revenues18.6% 21.0 %

(a)
Client Segmentation - we will segment our client offeringFor prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to provide distinct offeringscurrent period exchange rates to different typesremove the impact of client, focusing on the value we provide to our clientsforeign currency movements when comparing periods.



39


Willis Group Holdings plc


A reconciliation of reported net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying and organic EBITDA, is as follows (in millions, except per share data):
2014 compared to 2013
 2014 2013
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings, GAAP basis$362
 $365
Excluding:   
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest11
 12
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax(14) 
Income taxes159
 122
Interest expense135
 126
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 60
Other (income) expense, net(6) (22)
Depreciation92
 94
Amortization54
 55
Restructuring costs36
 
Expense reduction initiative
 41
Fees relating to the extinguishment of debt
 1
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (35)
Underlying EBITDA$829
 $819
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions and disposals11
 11
Organic EBITDA$818
 $808

(a)
Sector - we will build business lines around our industry and sector strength e.g. Human Capital and Employee Benefits.For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


How we compete which will be centered on meeting
40


Business discussion

A reconciliation of reported net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings, the needs of our client by:most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying and organic EBITDA, is as follows (in millions, except per share data):
2013 compared to 2012
 2013 2012
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings, GAAP basis$365
 (446)
Excluding:   
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest12
 13
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 (5)
Income taxes122
 101
Interest expense126
 128
Loss on extinguishment of debt60
 
Other (income) expense, net(22) (16)
Depreciation94
 79
Amortization55
 59
Expense reduction initiative41
 
Fees relating to the extinguishment of debt1
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy
 252
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor
 200
Goodwill impairment charge
 492
India JV settlement
 11
Insurance recovery
 (10)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance
 13
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (4)
Underlying EBITDA$854
 $867
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions and disposals43
 1
Organic EBITDA$811
 $866

(a)
Connection - leadingFor prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to more cross-sellingcurrent period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


41


Willis Group Holdings plc



A reconciliation of reported net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings and reported earnings per diluted share, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying net income and underlying earnings per diluted share, is as follows (in millions, except per share data):
2014 compared to 2013
     Per diluted share
 2014 2013 2014 2013
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings, GAAP$362
 $365
 $2.00
 $2.04
Excluding:       
Operational Improvement Program27
 
 0.15
 
Venezuela currency devaluation13
 
 0.07
 
Expense reduction initiative
 38
 
 0.21
Fees relating to the extinguishment of debt
 1
 
 0.01
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 60
 
 0.34
Gain on disposal of operations(2) (1) (0.01) (0.01)
Impact of US valuation allowance21
 9
 0.12
 0.05
Dilutive impact of potentially issuable shares
 
 
 
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (34) 
 (0.19)
Underlying net income$421
 $438
 $2.33
 $2.45

2013 compared to 2012
     Per diluted share
 2013 2012 2013 2012
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings, GAAP$365
 $(446) $2.04
 $(2.58)
Excluding:       
(Gain) loss on disposal of operations(1) 3
 (0.01) 0.02
Expense reduction initiative38
 
 0.21
 
Fees relating to the extinguishment of debt1
 
 0.01
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt60
 
 0.34
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy
 175
 
 0.99
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor
 138
 
 0.78
Goodwill impairment charge
 458
 
 2.60
India JV settlement
 11
 
 0.06
Insurance recovery
 (6) 
 (0.03)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance
 8
 
 0.05
Impact of US valuation allowance9
 113
 0.05
 0.64
Dilutive impact of potentially issuable shares
 
 
 0.05
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (4) 
 (0.02)
Underlying net income$472
 $450
 $2.64
 $2.56

(a)
Innovation - competing on analytics and innovation
Investment - focusing on earnings accretion, competitive position and fitFor prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.

Through these strategies we aim to grow revenue with positive operating leverage, grow cash flows and generate compelling returns for investors.






3842


Business discussion

REVIEW OF CONSOLIDATED RESULTS
The following table is a summary of our revenues, operating income (loss), operating margin, net income (loss) and diluted earnings per share (in millions, except per share data and percentages):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
REVENUES 
  
  
 
  
  
Commissions and fees$3,633
 $3,458
 $3,414
$3,767
 $3,633
 $3,458
Investment income15
 18
 31
16
 15
 18
Other income7
 4
 2
19
 7
 4
Total revenues3,655
 3,480
 3,447
3,802
 3,655
 3,480
EXPENSES 
  
  
 
  
  
Salaries and benefits(2,207) (2,475) (2,087)(2,314) (2,207) (2,475)
Other operating expenses(616) (581) (656)(659) (636) (600)
Depreciation expense(94) (79) (74)(92) (94) (79)
Amortization of intangible assets(55) (59) (68)(54) (55) (59)
Goodwill impairment charge
 (492) 

 
 (492)
Net gain (loss) on disposal of operations2
 (3) 4
Restructuring costs(36) 
 
Total expenses(2,970) (3,689) (2,881)(3,155) (2,992) (3,705)
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)685
 (209) 566
647
 663
 (225)
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs
 
 (171)
Other income (expense), net6
 22
 16
Loss on extinguishment of debt(60) 
 

 (60) 
Interest expense(126) (128) (156)(135) (126) (128)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES499
 (337) 239
518
 499
 (337)
Income taxes(122) (101) (32)(159) (122) (101)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES377
 (438) 207
359
 377
 (438)
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 5
 12
14
 
 5
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS377
 (433) 219
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 1
NET INCOME (LOSS)377
 (433) 220
373
 377
 (433)
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(12) (13) (16)(11) (12) (13)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$365
 $(446) $204
$362
 $365
 $(446)
          
Salaries and benefits as a percentage of total revenues60.4% 71.1 % 60.5%60.9% 60.4% 71.1 %
Other operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues16.9% 16.7 % 19.0%17.3% 17.4% 17.2 %
Operating margin (operating income (loss) as a percentage of total revenues)18.7% (6.0)% 16.4%17.0% 18.1% (6.5)%
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations$2.04
 $(2.58) $1.15
$2.00
 $2.04
 $(2.58)
Average diluted number of shares outstanding179
 173
 176
181
 179
 173


3943


Willis Group Holdings plc


Consolidated Results for 20132014 compared to 20122013
Revenues
Total revenues by segment for 20132014 and 20122013 are shown below (millions, except percentages):
      Change attributable to:      Change attributable to:
Year ended December 31,2013 2012 % Change Foreign
currency translation
 Acquisitions
and disposals
 
Organic
commissions and fees growth
(a)
2014 2013 % Change Foreign
currency translation
 Acquisitions
and disposals
 
Organic
commissions and fees growth
(a)
                  
Global$1,188
 $1,124
 5.7 % (0.9)% 1.0% 5.6%$1,386
 $1,358
 2.1% 0.9 % (0.2)% 1.4%
North America(b)
1,377
 1,306
 5.4 % (0.1)% 0.6% 4.9%1,365
 1,349
 1.2% (0.1)% (1.5)% 2.8%
International(c)
1,068
 1,028
 3.9 % (0.2)% % 4.1%1,016
 926
 9.7% (5.1)% 5.8 % 9.0%
Commissions and fees$3,633
 $3,458
 5.1 % (0.3)% 0.5% 4.9%$3,767
 $3,633
 3.7% (0.9)% 0.8 % 3.8%
Investment income15
 18
 (16.7)%  
  
  
16
 15
 6.7%  
  
  
Other income7
 4
 75.0 %  
  
  
19
 7
 171.4%  
  
  
Total revenues$3,655
 $3,480
 5.0 %  
  
  
$3,802
 $3,655
 4.0%  
  
  
_________________
(a) 
Organic commissions and fees growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; and (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented. Our methods of calculating this measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited.
(b)
North America commissions and fees in 2013 included the positive impact of a $5 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in the North America Personal Lines business with the rest of the Group.
(c)
International commissions and fees in 2013 included the negative impact of a $15 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in China with the rest of the Group.

Our methods of calculating these measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited.

Total revenues of $3,802 million increased by $175147 million, or 5.04.0 percent, in 20132014 compared to 20122013. This was primarily due to 5.13.7 percent growth in commissions and fees and an increase of $3 million in other income arising from the disposal of books of business, partially offset by a $3 million decrease in investment income due to continued falling yields on deposits.fees.

Total commissions and fees in 20132014 were $3,6333,767 million, up $175$134 million, or 5.13.7 percent, from $3,4583,633 million in 20122013. This increase was due tocomprised of organic growth of $134 million, or 4.93.8 percent, and growth through acquisitions and disposals of 0.5$28 million, or 0.8 percent, partially offset by negative foreign currency movements of $13$30 million or 0.30.9 percent.
Organic growthThe foreign currency impact was as a result of 4.9 percent was driven by low double-digit new business growth tempered by lost business.
Commissionsthe strengthening of the US dollar against a number of currencies that our commissions and fees were reducedare earned in, most significantly the Euro, Australian dollar and Brazilian real, partially offset by a net $9 million impactthe year-on-year weakening of two revenue recognition adjustments in the North America and International segments discussed below.US dollar against the Pound Sterling.
The Global segment reported 5.72.1 percent growth in commissions and fees, comprising 5.61.4 percent organic growth and a net 1.00.9 percent growth positive impact from acquisitions and disposals mainly due to Prime Professions which was acquired in second quarter 2013.foreign currency translation. This growth was partially offset by a 0.9net 0.2 percent negative impact decline from foreign currency translation.acquisitions and disposals primarily due to a disposal in third quarter 2013.
Organic commissions and fees growth of 5.61.4 percent was leddriven by high single-digitstrong new business growth and higher client retention levels compared with the year ago period, partially offset by the negative impact from declining insurance and reinsurance rates and significant construction projects in Reinsurance, where all the divisions reported positive growth. Global Specialties reported mid single-digit growth primarily due to strong growth from Financial and Executive Risk, and P&C and Construction. Willis Capital Markets & Advisory performed solidly but was down compared to the very strong result it recorded2013 that did not recur in 2012 relating to meaningfully higher volumes of advisory fees and catastrophe bond deals.2014.
The North America segment reported 5.41.2 percent growth in commissions and fees compared to 20122013. This comprised including organic growth of 4.92.8 percent and acquisitions of 0.6 percent from Avalon Actuarial Inc., which was acquired at the end of fourth quarter 2012, partially offset by 1.5 percent negative impact from the disposal of non-strategic low growth offices, and a negative 0.1 percent impact from foreign currency translation. Organic growth in commissions and fees was positively impacted by a $5 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in the North America Personal Lines business with the rest of the Group.
Organic growth was driven by double-digit new business growth and increased client retention levels compared to 2012. Growth was achieved across all of our North America regions, led by the Metro, Midwest, Canada and CAPPPS regions.

40


Business discussion

Similarly, most of the major practice groups recorded positive growth including mid-single digit growth in our two largest practices, Human Capital and Construction.
The International segment reported 3.99.7 percent growth in commissions and fees compared with 20122013, comprising 4.19.0 percent organic growth slightlyand 5.8 percent positive impact from the acquisitions of Max Matthiessen and Charles Monat. This was partially offset by a 0.25.1 percent negative impact from foreign currency translation. Organic growth in commissions and fees included the negative impact of a $15 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in China with the rest of the Group.
Organic growth was led by double-digit growth in our Latin America region and high single-digit growth in Eastern Europe. We reported low single-digit growth in Western Europe, despite the generally weak economic conditions within the region. Despite the negative impact of the $15 million revenue adjustment, we recorded good growth in Asia, predominantly in Hong Kong and Singapore. We also reported low single-digit growth in Australasia.
Organic commissions and fees growth by segment is discussed further in 'Review of Segmental Results', below.
Other income reported an increase of $12 million compared to 2013. This increase was primarily due to a $12 million settlement related to a specialty book of business within the Global segment.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits were $268107 million, or 10.84.8 percent, lowerhigher in 20132014 compared with 2012. Foreign currency movements lowered salaries and benefits by $9 million, or 0.4 percent.
In 20122013 we recordedand includes a $452net $20 million charge as a resultincrease from acquisitions and disposals, $3 million of the change in remuneration policy for future incentive awards and the elimination of the repayment requirement on past awards. Excluding the impact of this change andadverse foreign currency movements, salaries and benefits were up$29 million benefit from the

44


Business discussion

non-recurrence of 2013 expense reduction initiative costs. The remaining increase of $113 million was driven by $193 million or 9.5 percent. This increase is primarily due to annual salary reviews, increased headcount, due to targeted investments, increased incentives from the change in remuneration policypay reviews, and growth in commissions and fees, and an additional charge to increase the 401(k) match. It also includes $29 million relating to the Expense Reduction Initiative that was undertaken in first quarter 2013 (see 'Executive Summary - Expense Reduction Initiative' section above for further details).higher incentives.
Other Expenses
Other operating expenses were $35 million, or 6.0 percent, higher in 2013 compared with 2012. The $35 million increase includes $12 million of costs that were incurred in first quarter 2013 as part of our Expense Reduction Initiative (see 'Executive Summary - Expense Reduction Initiative' above for details).

The remaining $23 million increase was primarily due to higher business development costs, consulting and professional fees to assist us in our growth initiatives, and marketing costs.
Depreciation expense was $94 million in 2013, compared with $79 million in 2012. The increase of $15 million includes $5 million which was incurred in first quarter 2013 relating to the rationalization of property and systems as part of our Expense Reduction Initiative (see 'Executive Summary - Expense Reduction Initiative' above for details). The remaining $10 million increase is primarily due to a number of significant information technology related projects becoming operational during the year and the write-off of replaced systems and other assets.
Amortization of intangible assets was $55 million in 2013, a reduction of $4 million compared to 2012. The decrease primarily reflects the ongoing reduction in the HRH acquisition amortization.
Net gain on disposal of operations of $2 million was related principally to the disposal of our share in an Iberian associate.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
The Company incurred total losses on extinguishment of debt of $60 million during the year ended December 31, 2013. This was made up of a tender premium of $65 million, the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of $2 million and a credit for the reduction of the fair value adjustment on 5.625% senior notes due 2015 of $7 million.

41

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Income Taxes

The effective tax rate on ordinary income for 2013 was 20 percent, compared with 25 percent for 2012. The effective tax rate on ordinary income is calculated before the impact of certain discrete items. Discrete items occurring in 2013 with a significant impact on the tax rate were:
an incremental US tax expense of $9 million recorded after the taking into account the impact of adjustments to the valuation allowance placed against US deferred tax assets, US costs of $16 million associated with the Expense Reduction Initiative, and US costs of $61 million associated with the extinguishment of debt;

further non-US costs of $30 million associated with the Expense Reduction Initiative that are generally relieved at a rate higher than the underlying rate;

a net benefit of $4 million associated with a reduction in the corporation tax rate being applied to temporary tax differences in the UK;

a net benefit of $7 million associated with a change in the recognition of unrecognized tax benefits outside of the US; and

a net expense of $1 million associated with tax on profits of prior periods to bring in line the Company’s tax provision to filed tax positions.
Including the impact of discrete items, the tax rate for 2013 was 24 percent. This compares to a tax charge of $101 million recorded on the net loss from continuing operations of $337 million in 2012.

Interest in Earnings of Associates, net of Tax

The majority of our interest in earnings of associates relates to our share of ownership of Gras Savoye, the leading broker in France. Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax, in 2013 was $nil compared to $5 million in 2012. The decline was mainly driven by lower net income recorded in Gras Savoye due to the costs recognized in relation to a reorganization program undertaken in the year designed to drive growth in revenues and operational efficiencies.
Consolidated Results for 2012 compared to 2011
Revenues
       Change attributable to:
Year ended December 31,2012 2011 % Change Foreign
currency translation
 Acquisitions
and disposals
 
Organic
commissions and fees growth
(a)
          
Global$1,124
 $1,073
 4.8 % (1.3)% % 6.1 %
North America1,306
 1,314
 (0.6)%  % % (0.6)%
International1,028
 1,027
 0.1 % (4.8)% % 4.9 %
Commissions and fees$3,458
 $3,414
 1.3 % (1.8)% % 3.1 %
Investment income18
 31
 (41.9)%  
  
  
Other income4
 2
 100.0 %  
  
  
Total revenues$3,480
 $3,447
 1.0 %  
  
  
_________________
(a)
Organic commissions and fees growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; and (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented.

Our methods of calculating these measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited.


42

Table of Contents

Business discussion

Total revenues increased by $33 million, or 1.0 percent, in 2012 compared to 2011, including 3.1 percent growth in organic commissions and fees partially offset by a $59 million, or 1.8 percent, negative impact from foreign exchange and a $13 million decrease in investment income due to continued falling yields on deposits.

Total commissions and fees in 2012 were $3,458 million, up $44 million, or 1.3 percent, from $3,414 million in 2011. Foreign currency movements negatively impacted commissions and fees by 1.8 percent. Organic commissions and fees growth was 3.1 percent.

New business growth was in the double-digits and there were modest benefits in the year from improving rates in certain business lines and geographies; these positive movements were however, offset by a slight increase in lost business.

The Global segment reported 4.8 percent growth in commissions and fees, comprising 6.1 percent organic growth in commissions and fees and a 1.3 percent negative impact from foreign currency translation. Organic commissions and fees growth of 6.1 percent was led by high single-digit growth across Reinsurance and Willis Faber & Dumas. Global Specialties reported low single-digit growth as strong growth from our Marine, Energy, Financial Solutions, and Construction specialties were partially offset by declines in Aerospace, which continues to be hampered by competitive pricing and a soft rate environment.
The North America segment reported a 0.6 percent decline in organic commissions and fees, compared to 2011. Whilst new business levels were higher than in 2011 resulting in growth in certain regions and business segments, these were more than offset by lower Loan Protector revenues, the impact of the weakened economy, which negatively impacted our Construction and Human Capital practice groups, and a modest decrease in client retention levels.
The International segment reported essentially flat growth in commissions and fees compared with 2011, comprising 4.9 percent organic commissions and fees growth and a 4.8 percent negative impact from foreign currency translation. Organic growth in commissions and fees was led by double digit growth in our Latin America region, supported by high single-digit growth in Asia and Eastern Europe. Our Western Europe operations reported low single-digit growth despite the continued weakness of economies within the Eurozone.
Investment income in 2012 at $18 million was $13 million lower than in 2011, primarily due to declining net yields on cash and cash equivalents. Organic commissions and fees growth by segment is discussed further in 'Review of Segmental Results', below.
Salaries and Benefits

Salaries and benefits increased by $388 million, or 18.6 percent, in 2012 compared with 2011. Foreign currency movements lowered salaries and benefits by $34 million, or 1.6 percent. The year-on-year net favorable impact from foreign currency translation was driven primarily by the movement of the US dollar against the pound sterling (in which our London Market based operations incur the majority of their expenses).

Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, salaries and benefits increased by $422 million, or 20.2 percent, compared with 2011 primarily due to the $452 million expense recognized as a result of the change in remuneration policy for future incentive awards and the elimination of the repayment requirement on past awards; an approximate $55 million increase in salaries, including associated taxes and benefits, resulting from new hires and annual pay reviews; increases in incentives linked to production; long term incentive plans and the amortization of cash retention awards. These increases were partially offset by the $135 million expense recognized in salaries and benefits associated with the 2011 Operational Review and lower defined benefit pension plan expenses.
Other Expenses
Other operating expenses were $75$23 million, or 11.43.6 percent lower, higher in 20122014 compared with 20112013. ForeignThis growth included a net $9 million increase from acquisitions and disposals, $2 million of adverse foreign currency movements, positively impacted$12 million benefit from the non-recurrence of 2013 expense reduction initiative costs and marketing costs. The remaining increase of $25 million was primarily due to higher travel, accommodation and entertainment expenses, by $35 million, or 5.3 percent.along with increased systems costs.
ExcludingDepreciation expense was $92 million in 2014, compared with $94 million in 2013. The decrease of $2 million included $5 million benefit from non-recurrence of 2013 expense reduction initiative costs offset by $1 million of adverse foreign currency movements.
Amortization of intangible assets was $54 million in 2014, a reduction of $1 million compared to 2013. The decrease primarily reflects the impactongoing reduction in the HRH acquisition amortization partially offset by the increased charge relating to the acquisition of foreign exchange, other operating expenses decreased by $40Charles Monat and Max Matthiessen.
Restructuring costs related to our operational improvement program were $36 million or 6.1in 2014, compared with $nil in 2013. This is discussed in further detail in the 'Operational improvement program' section in the executive summary section above.

Income Taxes
The tax rate for 2014 was 31 percent, compared with 201124 percent for 2013. Both years were impacted by certain items and the continuing requirement to retain a valuation allowance against our US deferred tax assets. The increase in tax rate over the prior year is partly attributable to the US returning to a tax paying position for the 2014 tax year.
After adjusting for certain items, as listed below, the tax rate for 2014 was 25 percent: 
a tax benefit of $1 million associated with the $14 million pre-tax expense arising in relation to the Venezuela currency devaluation;
a tax benefit of $9 million associated with charges incurred in relation to the Operational Improvement Program;
a tax expense of $10 million associated with pre-tax gains of $12 million related to business disposals;
an expense of $21 million relating to an increase in US valuation allowance. The increase is attributable to a change in the US deferred tax position following resolution of uncertain tax positions from prior periods.

Interest in Earnings of Associates, net of Tax

The majority of our interest in earnings of associates relates to our share of ownership of Gras Savoye, the leading broker in France. Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax, in 2014 was $14 million compared to $nil in 2013. The increase was primarily due to the non-recurrence of the $73 million expense recognized in other operating expenses associated with the 2011 Operational Review and the $10 million insurance recovery in 2012 relatedcharges relating to the previously disclosed fraudulent activity, partially offset by increases2013 reorganization program and other non-recurring items, with improved underlying financial performance, in certain other costs, including provisioning for bad debts and higher technology expenditure.Gras Savoye.


4345

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Consolidated Results for 2013 compared to 2012
Revenues
Total revenues by segment for 2013 and 2012 are shown below (millions, except percentages):
       Change attributable to:
Year ended December 31,2013 2012 % Change Foreign
currency translation
 Acquisitions
and disposals
 
Organic
commissions and fees growth
(a)
          
Global$1,358
 $1,303
 4.2 % (0.9)% 0.8% 4.3%
North America1,349
 1,281
 5.3 % (0.1)% 0.6% 4.8%
International926
 874
 5.9 % 0.1 % % 5.8%
Commissions and fees$3,633
 $3,458
 5.1 % (0.3)% 0.5% 4.9%
Investment income15
 18
 (16.7)%  
  
  
Other income7
 4
 75.0 %  
  
  
Total revenues$3,655
 $3,480
 5.0 %  
  
  
_________________
(a)
Organic commissions and fees growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; and (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented.

Our methods of calculating these measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited.

Total revenues increased by $175 million, or 5.0 percent, in 2013 compared to 2012. This was primarily due to 4.9 percent growth in organic commissions and fees, partially offset by a 0.3 percent negative impact from foreign exchange and a $3 million decrease in investment income due to continued falling yields on deposits.
Total commissions and fees in 2013 were $3,633 million, up $175 million, or 5.1 percent, from $3,458 million in 2012. This increase was due to organic growth of 4.9 percent and growth through acquisitions and disposals of 0.5 percent partially offset by negative foreign currency movements of $13 million or 0.3 percent.
Organic growth of 4.9 percent was driven by low double-digit new business growth tempered by lost business.
Commissions and fees were reduced by a net $9 million impact of two revenue recognition adjustments in the North America and International segments discussed below.
The Global segment reported 4.2 percent growth in commissions and fees, comprising 4.3 percent organic growth, a 0.8 percent positive impact from acquisitions and disposals, and a 0.9 percent negative impact from foreign currency translation. Organic commissions and fees growth of 4.3 percent was led by high single-digit growth in Reinsurance, where all the divisions reported positive growth. Global Specialties reported mid single-digit growth primarily due to strong growth from Financial and Executive Risk, and P&C and Construction.
The North America segment reported a 5.3 percent growth in organic commissions and fees, compared to 2012, comprising 4.8 percent organic commissions and fees growth, a 0.6 percent positive impact from acquisition of Avalon Actuarial Inc., and a 0.1 percent negative impact from foreign currency translation. Organic growth in commissions and fees was positively impacted by a $5 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in the North America Personal Lines business with the rest of the Group.
The International segment reported 5.9 percent growth in commissions and fees compared with 2012, comprising 5.8 percent organic commissions and fees growth and a 0.1 percent positive impact from foreign currency translation. Organic growth in commissions and fees included the negative impact of a $15 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in China with the rest of the Group.
Investment income in 2013 at $15 million was $3 million lower than in 2012. Organic commissions and fees growth by segment is discussed further in 'Review of Segmental Results', below.
Salaries and Benefits

Salaries and benefits increased by $268 million, or 10.8 percent, in 2013 compared with 2012. Foreign currency movements lowered salaries and benefits by $9 million, or 0.4 percent.

46

Table of Contents

Business discussion

In 2012 we recorded a $452 million charge as a result of the change in remuneration policy for future incentive awards and the elimination of the repayment requirement on past awards. Excluding the impact of this change and foreign currency movements, salaries and benefits were up by $193 million or 9.5 percent. This increase is primarily due to annual salary reviews, increased headcount from targeted investments, increased incentives from the change in remuneration policy and growth in commissions and fees, and an additional charge to increase the 401(k) match in North America. It also includes $29 million relating to the Expense Reduction Initiative that was undertaken in first quarter 2013.
Other Expenses
Other operating expenses were $36 million, or 6.0 percent, higher in 2013 compared with 2012. The $36 million increase includes $12 million of costs that were incurred in first quarter 2013 as part of our Expense Reduction Initiative.
The remaining $24 million increase was primarily due to higher business development costs, consulting and professional fees to assist us in our growth initiatives, and marketing costs.
Depreciation expense was $94 million in 2013, compared with $79 million in 2012, compared with $74. The increase of $15 million includes $5 million which was incurred in 2011.first quarter 2013 relating to the rationalization of property and systems as part of our Expense Reduction Initiative. The remaining $10 million increase is primarily due to a number of significant information technology related projects becoming operational atduring the endyear and the write-off of 2011replaced systems and during first half 2012 partially offset by $5 million depreciation charge incurred in 2011 related to the Operational Review.other assets
Amortization of intangible assets was $59$55 million in 20122013, a reduction of $9$4 million compared to 20112012. The decrease primarily reflects the ongoing reduction in the HRH acquisition amortization.
Goodwill impairment charge was $nil in 2013 (2012: $492 million in 2012million). This was a non-cash charge recognized related to the impairment of the carrying value of the North America reporting unit's goodwill. For further information on our testing for goodwill impairment, see 'Critical Accounting Estimates', below.
Net loss
Loss on disposalExtinguishment of operationsDebt
The Company incurred total losses on extinguishment of $3debt of $60 million during the year ended December 31, 2013. This was related principally to the dissolutionmade up of a joint venture operation in India and loss recognized on disposaltender premium of Mauritian reinsurance operation.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $128$65 million, in 2012 compared to $156 million in 2011. The decrease in interest expense primarily reflects the non-recurrence of a $10 million write-off of unamortized debt fees in 2011 related toissuance costs of $2 million and a credit for the refinancingreduction of the term loan and revolving credit facility and savings as a resultfair value adjustment on 5.625% senior notes due 2015 of the lower coupon payable and reduced fee amortization on our new debt issued in March 2011 and December 2011.$7 million.
Income Taxes

The effective tax rate on ordinary income for 20122013 was 25 per cent,20 percent, compared with 24 per cent25 percent for 2011, with the increase driven primarily by higher than anticipated US state income tax expense, the benefit from the higher tax rates at which costs associated with the 2011 Operational Review are relieved and from a different geographic mix of earnings.2012. The effective tax rate on ordinary income is calculated before the impact of certain discrete items. Discrete items occurring in 20122013 with a significant impact on the tax rate are:were:
an incremental US tax expense of $9 million recorded after the taking into account the impact of adjustments to the valuation allowance placed against US deferred tax assets, US costs of $16 million associated with the Expense Reduction Initiative, and US costs of $61 million associated with the extinguishment of debt;

a tax creditfurther non-US costs of $34$30 million onassociated with the $492 million charge related to the impairment of the carrying value of the North America reporting unit's goodwill. The tax credit arises in relation toExpense Reduction Initiative that part of the charge that is attributable to tax deductible goodwill;

tax related to the $252 million charge for the additional incentive accrual arising from a change in remuneration policy which isare generally relieved at a higher rate than the underlying rate;

tax related to the $200 million charge for the write-off of unamortized retention awards which is generally relieved at a higher rate than the underlying rate;

a valuation allowancenet benefit of $125$4 million made against US deferred tax assets recorded following cumulative losses being incurredassociated with a reduction in the US. The cumulative losses are primarily attributablecorporation tax rate being applied to exceptional charges associated with the 2011 Operational review, the impairment of North America goodwill and the additional incentive costs associated with the change in remuneration policy. Of the total valuation allowance, $113 million was recordedtemporary tax differences in the income statement and $12 million in other comprehensive income;UK;

a non-deductible chargenet benefit of $11$7 million forassociated with a settlement with former partners related tochange in the terminationrecognition of a joint venture arrangement in India;unrecognized tax benefits outside of the US; and

adjustments made in respecta net expense of $1 million associated with tax on profits of prior periods to bring in line the Company'sCompany’s tax provisionsprovision to filed tax positions; and

the net tax impact of the $3 million loss on disposal of operations.

positions.
Including the impact of discrete items, the tax rate for 2013 was 24 percent. This compares to a tax charge of $101 million was recorded on athe net loss from continuing operations before interest in earnings of associates of $337 million. This compares to a tax rate of 13 percentmillion in 2011.


2012.

4447

Table of Contents

Business discussionWillis Group Holdings plc


Interest in Earnings of Associates, net of Tax

The majority of our interest in earnings of associates relates to our share of ownership of Gras Savoye, the leading broker in France. Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax, in 20122013 was $$5 millionnil compared to $12$5 million in 20112012. The decline was mainly driven by a reduction inlower net income reported by our principal associate,recorded in Gras Savoye.
SimilarSavoye due to many businesses locatedthe costs recognized in relation to a reorganization program undertaken in the Eurozone, Gras Savoye's operations are being pressured by the economic conditions. In addition, Gras Savoye appointed a new CEO and began undergoing a business review that wasyear designed to drive growth in revenues and improve operational efficiencies.
Discontinued Operations, net of Tax
There were no discontinued operations in 2012.
In 2011 the Company disposed of Global Special Risks, LLC, Faber & Dumas Canada Ltd and the trade and assets of Maclean, Oddy & Associates, Inc. The gain (net of tax) on this disposal was $2 million.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity

We believe that our balance sheet and strong cash flow provide us with the platform and flexibility to remain committed to our cash allocation strategy of:

investing in the business for growth;
value-creating merger and acquisition activity;
generating a steadily rising dividend; and
the repurchase of shares.

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash from operations, available cash and cash equivalents and amounts available under our three revolving credit facilities, excluding the UK facility which is solely for use by our main regulated UK entity in certain exceptional circumstances.

circumstances, and the Willis Securities facility, which is solely used for regulatory capital and securities underwriting purposes only.
Our principal short-term uses of liquidity and capital resources are operating expenses, capital expenditures, shareholder returns,dividends and repurchase of shares, funding defined benefit pension plans, and the repurchaseservicing of shares.

debt.
Our long-term liquidity requirements consist of the repayment of the principal amount of outstanding notes; borrowings under our 7-year term loanloan; and revolving credit facilities; and ourfunding defined benefit pension contributionsplans as discussed below.

As at December 31, 20132014 cash and cash equivalents were $796$635 million, an increasea decrease of $296$161 million compared to December 31, 2012.2013. Included within cash and cash equivalents is $707$545 million available for corporate purposes and $89$90 million held within our regulated UK entities for regulatory capital adequacy requirements.

Cash flows from operating activities increasedfell to $477 million in 2014 from $561 million in 2013 from $525 million in 2012.2013. In addition, funds were also$6 million was provided from the disposal of fixed and intangible assets (2013: $12 million (2012: $5 million), $155$134 million proceeds from the issue of shares (2012: $53(2013: $155 million), and $20$86 million proceeds from the disposal of operations (2012: $nil)(2013: $20 million).

As at December 31, 20132014 there was $nil drawn down on theall four of our revolving credit facilities (2012:(2013: $nil).

During the year ended
December 31, 2014, we made five drawings totaling $1,175 million and five repayments of $1,175 million on the Willis Securities facility.
The primary uses of funds during 2014 included $401 million cash payments of 2013 included $346 million of cash incentive award payments relating to 2012, $193awards, $210 million related to payments of dividends, $150$122 million cash contributions, including employees' salary sacrifice contributions, to our defined benefit pension schemes, capital expenditures of $112$113 million related to leasehold improvements, information technology and transformation projects, $30$241 million for the acquisition of Prime Professionsrelated to acquisitions, primarily Max Matthiessen Holding AB and CBC Broker Srl,Charles Monat Limited, and a $4 million deferred cash payment related to acquirethe partial acquisition of the remaining noncontrolling interest in our Colombia reinsurance operation.China operation in a prior period.


45

TableThe Company is authorized to buy back its ordinary shares by way of Contentsredemption, and will consider whether to do so from time

to time based on many factors including market conditions. During 2014, the Company bought back 5,050,000 shares for a total cost of $213 million. In February 2015, Willis Group Holdings plcannounced that it intends to buy back approximately $175 million in shares in 2015 to offset the increase in shares outstanding resulting from the exercise of employee stock options.


Based on current market conditions and information available to us at this time, we believe that we have sufficient liquidity to meet our cash needs for the next twelve months.

The Company is authorized to buy back its ordinary shares by way
48

Table of redemption, and intends to buy back $200 million shares in 2014 to offset the increase in shares from the exercise of employee stock options.Contents

Business discussion

The impact of movements in liquidity, debt and EBITDA in 20132014 had a negativepositive impact on the interest coverage ratio and a positive impact on the leverage ratio. Both ratios remain well within the requirements of the revolving credit facility covenants.

Debt
Total debt, total equity and the capitalization ratio at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 were as follows (in millions, except percentages):
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Long-term debt$2,311
 $2,338
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt$15
 $15
Total debt$2,326
 $2,353
Stockholders' equity$2,215
 $1,699
Capitalization ratio51.2% 58.1%
On July 23, 2013 we entered into an amendment to our existing credit facilities to extend both the amount of financing and the maturity date of the facilities. As a result of this amendment, our revolving credit facility was increased from $500 million to $800 million. The maturity date on both the revolving credit facility and the $300 million term loan was extended to July 23, 2018, from December 16, 2016. At the amendment date we owed $281 million on the term loan and there was no change to this amount as a result of the refinancing.
The 7-year term loan facility expiring 2018 bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.50% and is repayable in quarterly installments and a final repayment of $186 million is due in the third quarter of 2018. In 2013, we made $15 million of mandatory repayments against this 7-year term loan. Drawings under the $800 million revolving credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%. These margins apply while the Company’s debt rating remains BBB-/Baa3. As of December 31, 2013 $nil was outstanding under this revolving credit facility (December 31, 2012: $nil).
On August 15, 2013 the Company issued $250 million of 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and $275 million of 6.125% senior notes due 2043. The effective interest rates of these senior notes are 4.696% and 6.154%, respectively, which include the impact of the discount upon issuance.
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Long-term debt$2,142
 $2,311
Current portion of long-term debt$167
 $15
Total debt$2,309
 $2,326
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity$1,985
 $2,215
Capitalization ratio53.8% 51.2%
On July 25, 2013 the Company commenced an offer to purchase for cash any and all of its 5.625% senior notes due 2015 and a portion of its 6.200% senior notes due 2017 and its 7.000% senior notes due 2019 for an aggregate purchase price of up to $525 million. On August 22, 2013 the proceeds from the issue of the senior notes due 2023 and 2043 were used to fund the purchase of $202 million of 5.625% senior notes due 2015, $206 million of 6.200% senior notes due 2017 and $113 million of 7.000% senior notes due 2019.
The Company incurred total losses on extinguishment of debt of $60 million during the year ended December 31, 2013. This was made up of a tender premium of $65 million, the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of $2 million and a credit for the reduction of the fair value adjustment on 5.625% senior notes due 2015 of $7 million.
The agreements relating to our 7-year term loan facility expiring 2018 and the revolving $800 million credit facility contain requirements to maintain maximum levels of consolidated funded indebtedness in relation to consolidated EBITDA and minimum level of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated cash interest expense, subject to certain adjustments. In addition, the agreements relating to our credit facilities and senior notes include, in the aggregate covenants relating to the delivery of financial statements, reports and notices, limitations on liens, limitations on sales and other disposals of assets, limitations on indebtedness and other liabilities, limitations on sale and leaseback transactions, limitations on mergers and other fundamental changes, maintenance of property, maintenance of insurance, nature of business, compliance with applicable laws, maintenance of corporate existence and rights, payment of taxes and access to information and properties. At December 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.
These refinancing actions have lengthened our debt maturity profile. At December 31, 2013, we had $nil outstanding under the $800 million facility (December 31, 2012: $nil), the UK $20 million facility (December 31, 2012: $nil) and the RMB facility

46

Table of Contents

Business discussion

(December 31, 2012: $nil). At December 31, 20132014 the only mandatory debt repayments falling due over the next 12 months are $148 million outstanding on our 5.625% senior notes, scheduled repayments on our 7-year term loan totaling $15 million.
Pensions
UK plan
The Company made cash contributions of $88 million in 2013 (2012: $80 million) into the UK defined benefit pension plan, and $12 million (2012: $12 million) in respect of employees' salary sacrifice contributions.
Contributions to the UK defined benefit pension plan in 2014 are expected to total $83 million, of which approximately $2317 million relates to on-going contributions calculated as 15.9 percent of active plan members’ pensionable salaries, and approximately $60 million relates to contributions towards funding the deficit. Additionally $12$1 million will be made in respect of employees' salary sacrifice contributions.outstanding on our 3-year term loan.
In addition, further contributions may be payable based on a profit share calculation (equal to 20 percent of EBITDA in excess of $900 million per annum as defined by the revised schedule of contributions) and an exceptional return calculation (equal to 10 percent of any exceptional returns made to shareholders, for example, share buybacks and special dividends). Aggregate contributions under the deficit funding contribution and the profit share calculation are capped at £312 million ($517 million) over the six years ended December 31, 2017.
The schedule of contributions is automatically renegotiated after three years and at any earlier time jointly agreed by the Company and the Trustee. During 2014 we will be required to negotiate a new funding arrangement which may change the contributions we are required to make in the future.
US plan
We made cash contributions to our US defined benefit plan of $40 million in 2013 and in 2012.
We will make cash contributions of approximately $30 million to the US plan in 2014.
Other defined benefit pension plans
We made cash contributions to our other defined benefit pension plans of $10 million in 2013 and $11 million 2012.
In 2014, we expect to contribute approximately $9 million to these schemes.

47

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Cash flow
Summary consolidated cash flow information (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Cash provided by operating activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities$561
 $525
 $441
Net cash used in discontinued operations
 
 (2)
Total net cash provided by operating activities561
 525
 439
$477
 $561
 $525
Cash flows from investing activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Total net cash used in continuing investing activities(120) (172) (101)(276) (120) (172)
Cash flows from financing activities 
  
  
 
  
  
Total net cash used in continuing financing activities(137) (291) (214)(323) (137) (291)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents304
 62
 124
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(122) 304
 62
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(8) 2
 (4)(39) (8) 2
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year500
 436
 316
796
 500
 436
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year$796
 $500
 $436
$635
 $796
 $500
This summary consolidated cash flow should be viewed in addition to, not in lieu of, the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Cash Flow for 20132014 compared to 20122013
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2014 decreased by $84 million to $477 million compared with 2013.
The $477 million cash from operations comprises net income of $373 million, net $257 million of non-cash adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities and $150 million of negative working capital movements.
The non-cash adjustments included depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation and provisions for deferred income taxes.
Movements in working capital included $401 million of incentive payments and $122 million cash contributions (including $10 million for employees’ salary sacrifice) to our defined benefit pension schemes. Additionally, there was a $66 million increase in accounts receivable, as revenue recognized in 2014 was greater than cash collection, and $432 million positive movement in other liabilities which included incentives accrued during 2014 that will be paid in 2015.

49

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


The $84 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily driven by lower reported operating income, the non-recurrence of closed-out derivative contracts in the prior year, increased working capital and higher cash taxes paid.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities in 2014 was $276 million. This included capital expenditure of $113 million, cash used to purchase subsidiaries, intangible assets and other investments of $255 million partly offset by $6 million cash received from the sale of fixed and intangible assets and $86 million of proceeds from the disposal of operations.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities in 2014 was $323 million primarily due to dividends paid, including dividends paid to noncontrolling interests, of $227 million, $213 million to repurchase approximately five million shares and $15 million of mandatory repayments against the term loan offset by cash receipts of $134 million from the issue of shares.
Consolidated Cash Flow for 2013 compared to 2012
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2013 increased by $36 million to $561 million compared with 2012.
The $561 million cash from operations comprises net income of $377 million, net $313 million of non-cash adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities and working capital movementsmovements.
The non-cash adjustments included depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation, gain on derivative instruments, provision for deferred income taxes and the tender premium on early redemption of our debt, which is presented as a financing cash item.
Movements in working capital included $346 million of incentive payments and $150 million cash contributions (including $12 million for employees’ salary sacrifice) to our defined benefit pension schemes. Additionally, there was a $116 million increase in accounts receivable, as revenue recognized in 2013 was greater than cash collection, and $445 million positive movement in other liabilities which included incentives accrued during 2013 that will be paid in 2014.
The $36 million increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily driven by favorable movements in working capital versus the prior year.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities in 2013 was $120 million including, capital expenditure of $112 million, cash used to purchase subsidiaries, intangible assets and other investments of $44 million partly offset by $12$6 million cash received from the sale of fixed and intangible assets and $24 million of proceeds from the disposal of operations and the sale of the Company’s holding in a Spanish associate company.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities in 2013 was $137 million primarily due to total dividends paid, including dividends paid to noncontrolling interests, of $203 million, a net $72 million outflow in relation to the refinancing in the third quarter 2013, discussed below, and $15 million of mandatory repayments against the term loan offset by cash receipts of $155 million from the issue of shares.

48

Table of Contents

Business discussion

The refinancing during 2013 resulted in a net cash outflow of $72 million which included: $521 million cash paid to repurchase $202 million of 5.625% senior notes due 2015, $206 million of 6.200% senior notes due 2017 and $113 million of 7.000% senior notes due 2019, the tender premium of $65 million and debt issuance costs of $8 million; this was primarily funded by $522 million cash inflow from senior notes issued, discussed earlier, and free operating cash flows.
Consolidated Cash Flow for 2012 compared to 2011
Operating Activities
Total net cash provided by continuing operating activities was $525 million in 2012, compared with $441 million in 2011. The increase of $84 million primarily reflects a $100 million reduction in cash outflows relating to the 2011 Operational Review and a higher volume of collections made on higher revenues and accounts receivable compared with 2011, partially offset by the modest decline in operating earnings, adjusted for non-cash items; and the $11 million year-on-year increase in payments for cash retention awards.
Investing Activities
Total net cash used in continuing investing activities was $172 million in 2012 compared to $101 million in 2011. The $71 million increase in net outflow was due to higher capital spend, including; the fit-out and refurbishment of certain leasehold properties, including the completion of the European Data Center; development and implementation of a number of information technology projects including, financial systems and trading platforms; a $23 million increase in payments to acquire subsidiaries, primarily related to the acquisition of Avalon Actuarial, Inc, a Canadian actuarial consulting firm; and the non-recurrence of proceeds from the disposal of certain businesses during 2011.
Financing Activities
Total net cash used in continuing financing activities was $291 million in 2012 compared to $214 million in 2011. The $77 million increase in cash used was the result of the $100 million cash outflow relating to the repurchase of 2.8 million shares during 2012 and the $30 million year-on-year increase in payments made to acquire noncontrolling interests including, Gras Savoye Re, and our Columbian retail operation; partially offset by the reduction in repayments of debt, net of the refinancing during 2011.
Consolidated Cash Flow for 2011 compared to 2010
Operating Activities
Total net cash provided by continuing operating activities was $441 million in 2011 compared with $491 million in 2010. The decrease of $50 million primarily reflects the $57 million year-on-year increase in accounts receivable, reflecting increased revenue but also slower collections in the US due to current economic conditions; cash outflows of approximately $120 million relating to the 2011 Operational Review; and the $24 million year-on-year increase in payments for cash retention awards. These were partly offset by realized cash savings resulting from the 2011 Operational Review and other working capital movements.
Investing Activities
Total net cash used in continuing investing activities was $101 million in 2011 compared to $94 million in 2010. The $101 million net outflow was mainly due to capital spend including fit-out of our Nashville office and IT project investments.
Financing Activities
Total net cash used in continuing financing activities was $214 million in 2011 compared with $293 million in 2010. We issued $800 million of new debt in March 2011 and net proceeds of approximately $787 million were used to repurchase and redeem $500 million of 12.875% senior notes due 2016. As part of this debt refinancing we made a $158 million make-whole payment on the redemption of our 12.875% senior notes due 2016. Other significant financing activities in 2011 included refinancing our bank facility in December 2011, dividend payments of $180 million and receipt of $60 million from the issue of shares.

49

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Own funds
As of December 31, 20132014, we had cash and cash equivalents of $796635 million, compared with $500796 million at December 31, 20122013. Additionally, $822$1,222 million was available to draw under our revolving credit facilities at December 31, 20132014, compared with $520$822 million at December 31, 20122013.

50

Table of Contents

Business discussion

Fiduciary funds
As an intermediary, we hold funds generally in a fiduciary capacity for the account of third parties, typically as the result of premiums received from clients that are in transit to insurers and claims due to clients that are in transit from insurers. We report premiums, which are held on account of, or due from, clients as assets with a corresponding liability due to the insurers. Claims held by, or due to, us which are due to clients are also shown as both assets and liabilities.
Fiduciary funds are generally required to be kept in certain regulated bank accounts subject to guidelines which emphasize capital preservation and liquidity; such funds are not available to service the Company’s debt or for other corporate purposes. Notwithstanding the legal relationships with clients and insurers, the Company is entitled to retain investment income earned on fiduciary funds in accordance with industry custom and practice and, in some cases, as supported by agreements with insureds.
As of December 31, 20132014, we had fiduciary funds of $1.7$1.9 billion,, compared with $1.8$1.7 billion at December 31, 20122013.
Share buybacks

The Company is authorized to buy back shares, by way of redemption, and will consider whether to do so from time to time, based on many factors, including market conditions. The Company is authorized to purchase up to one billion shares from time to time in the open market (such open market purchases would be effected as redemptions under Irish law) and it may also redeem its shares through negotiated trades with persons who are not affiliated with the Company as long as the cost of the acquisition of the Company's shares does not exceed $824 million.a certain authorized limit.

AsIn February 2015, the Company announced that, during the year, it intended to buyback approximately $175 million of February 14, 2014 there remains approximately $824 million available to purchase common shares under the current authorization.
The Company intendsthis authorization, from time to buy back $200 million in shares in 2014time, depending on many factors including market conditions to offset the increase in shares outstanding resulting from the exercise of employee stock options. The buybacks willwould be made in the open market or through privately-negotiated transactions, from time to time, depending on market conditions.

As of February 20, 2015 there remains approximately $611 million available to purchase ordinary shares under the current authorization.
The share buy back program may be modified, extended or terminated at any time by the Board of Directors.
Dividends
Cash dividends paid in 20132014 were $193$210 million compared with $185$193 million in 20122013 and $180$185 million in 2011.2012. In February 2014,2015, we declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.30$0.31 per share, an annual rate of $1.20$1.24 per share, an increase of 7.13.3 percent over the prior 12 month period.



5051


Business discussionWillis Group Holdings plc


REVIEW OF SEGMENTAL RESULTSNorth America

Our North America business provides risk management, insurance brokerage, related risk services, and employee benefits brokerage and consulting to a wide array of industry and client segments in the United States and Canada. With around 80 locations, organized into seven geographical regions including Canada, Willis North America locally delivers our global and national resources and specialist expertise through this retail distribution network.

In addition to being organized geographically and by specialty, our North America business focuses on four client segments: global, large national/middle-market, small commercial, and private client, with service, marketing and sales platform support for each segment.

Construction
The largest industry practice group in North America is Construction, which specializes in providing risk management, insurance brokerage, and surety bonding services to the construction industry. Willis Construction provided these services to nearly 10,000 clients including approximately 20 percent of the Engineering News Record Top 400 contractors (a listing of the largest 400 North American contractors based on reported revenue). In addition, this practice group has expertise in professional liability insurance, controlled insurance programs for large projects and insurance for national homebuilders.

Human Capital
Willis Human Capital, fully integrated into the North America platform, is the Group's largest product-based practice group and provides health, welfare and human resources consulting, and brokerage services to all of our commercial client segments. This practice group's value lies in helping clients control employee benefit plan costs, reducing the amount of time human resources professionals spend administering their companies' benefit plans and educating and training employees on benefit plan issues.

Executive Risks
Another industry-leading North America practice group is Willis Executive Risks, a national team of technical professionals who specialize in meeting the directors and officers, employment practices, fiduciary liability insurance risk management, and claims advocacy needs of public and private corporations and organizations. This practice group also has expertise in professional liability, especially cyber risks.

Other industry practice groups
Other industry practice groups include Healthcare, serving the professional liability and other insurance and risk management needs of private and not-for-profit health systems, hospitals and physicians groups; Financial Institutions, serving the needs of large banks, insurers and other financial services firms; and Mergers & Acquisitions, providing due diligence, and risk management and insurance brokerage services to private equity and merchant banking firms and their portfolio companies.

International
Our International business comprises our operations in Western Europe, Central and Eastern Europe, Asia, Australasia, the Middle East, South Africa and Latin America.
Our offices provide services to businesses locally in nearly 120 countries around the world, making use of local expertise as well as skills, industry knowledge and expertise available elsewhere in the Group.

10


About Willis

The services provided are focused according to the characteristics of each market and vary across offices, but generally include direct risk management and insurance brokerage, specialist and reinsurance brokerage and employee benefits consulting.
As part of our ongoing strategy, we continue to look for opportunities to strengthen our International market share through acquisitions and strategic investments. A list of significant subsidiaries is included in Exhibit 21.1 to this document.

We organizehave also invested in associate companies; our significant associates at December 31, 2014 were GS & Cie Groupe ('Gras Savoye'), a French organization (30 percent holding) and Al-Futtaim Willis Co. LLC, organized under the laws of Dubai (49 percent holding). In connection with many of our investments we retain the right to increase our ownership over time, typically to a majority or 100 percent ownership position.
We believe the combined total revenues of our International subsidiaries and associates provide an indication of the spread and capability of our International network.
Management structure
During the first quarter 2015 we have reorganized our business from three reporting units (formerly known as Global, North America and International) into four reporting units: Willis Capital, Wholesale and Reinsurance, Willis North America, Willis International, and Willis Great Britain "Willis GB".
Willis North America and Willis International remain largely unchanged except for certain specialty teams previously included within Global are now included within the geographic regions in which they are located.
Willis Capital, Wholesale and Reinsurance includes Willis Re, Willis Capital Markets and Advisory and our wholesale businesses as well as a new unit called Willis Portfolio and Underwriting Services.
Willis GB includes our UK retail, facultative and London specialty businesses.
Customers
Our clients operate on a global and local scale in a multitude of businesses and industries throughout the world and generally range in size from major multinational corporations to middle-market companies. Further, many of our client relationships span decades, for instance our relationship with The Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company Limited dates back over 100 years. No one client accounted for more than 10 percent of revenues for fiscal year 2014. Additionally, we place insurance with approximately 2,500 insurance carriers, none of which individually accounted for more than 10 percent of the total premiums we placed on behalf of our clients in 2014.
Competition
We face competition in all fields in which we operate, based on global capability, product breadth, innovation, quality of service and price. We compete with Marsh & McLennan and Aon, the two other major providers of global risk management services, as well as with numerous specialist, regional and local firms. Competition for business is intense in all of our business lines and in every insurance market, and Marsh & McLennan and Aon have substantially greater market share than we do. Competition on premium rates has also exacerbated the pressures caused by a continuing reduction in demand in some classes of business. For example, rather than purchase additional insurance through brokers, some insureds have been retaining a greater proportion of their risk portfolios than previously. Industrial and commercial companies increasingly rely upon their own subsidiary insurance companies, known as captive insurance companies, self-insurance pools, risk retention groups, mutual insurance companies and other mechanisms for funding their risks, rather than buy insurance. Additional competitive pressures arise from the entry of new market participants, such as banks, accounting firms and insurance carriers themselves, offering risk management or transfer services.


11


Willis Group Holdings plc


Regulation
Our business activities are subject to legal requirements and governmental and quasi-governmental regulatory supervision in all countries in which we operate. Also, such regulations may require individual or company licensing to conduct our business activities. While these requirements may vary from location to location they are generally designed to protect our clients by establishing minimum standards of conduct and practice, particularly regarding the provision of advice and product information as well as financial criteria. Our three most significant regulatory regions are described below:
United States
Our activities in connection with insurance brokerage services within the United States are subject to regulation and supervision by state authorities. Although the scope of regulation and form of supervision may vary from state to state, insurance laws in the United States are often complex and generally grant broad discretion to supervisory authorities in adopting regulations and supervising regulated activities. That supervision generally includes the licensing of insurance brokers and agents and the regulation of the handling and investment of client funds held in a fiduciary capacity. Our continuing ability to provide insurance brokerage in the states in which we currently operate is dependent upon our compliance with the rules and regulations promulgated from time to time by the regulatory authorities in each of these states.
European Union
In 2005, the European Union Insurance Mediation Directive introduced rules to enable insurance and reinsurance intermediaries to operate and provide services within each member state of the European Union on a basis consistent with the EU single market and customer protection aims. Each EU member state in which we operate is required to ensure that the insurance and reinsurance intermediaries resident in their country are registered with a statutory body in that country and that each intermediary meets professional requirements in relation to their competence, good repute, professional indemnity cover and financial capacity.
United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom, our business is regulated by the Financial Conduct Auditory ('FCA'). The FCA has a wide range of rule-making, investigatory and enforcement powers, and conducts monitoring visits to assess our compliance with regulatory requirements.
The FCA has a sole strategic objective: to protect and enhance confidence in the UK financial system. Its operational objectives are to: secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers; promote efficiency and choice in the market for financial services; and protect and enhance the integrity of the UK financial system. The FCA also has a duty to act in a way that promotes competition, and to minimize the extent to which regulated businesses may be used for a purpose connected with financial crime. Finally, the FCA has new powers in product intervention. For instance, it can instruct firms to withdraw or amend misleading financial promotions.
Other
Certain of our activities are governed by other regulatory bodies, such as investment and securities licensing authorities. In the United States, our Willis Capital Markets & Advisory business operates through our wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Securities, Inc., a US-registered broker-dealer and member FINRA/SIPC, primarily in connection with investment banking-related services and advising on alternative risk financing transactions. Willis Capital Markets provides advice on securities or investments in the European Union and Australia through our UK wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Capital Markets & Advisory Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the FCA. Willis Capital Markets, through our Hong Kong wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Capital Markets & Advisory (Hong Kong) Limited, is in the process of obtaining securities and advisory licenses through, and will be regulated by, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.
Our failure, or that of our employees, to satisfy the regulators that we comply with their requirements or the legal requirements governing our activities, can result in disciplinary action, fines, reputational damage and financial harm.
All companies carrying on similar activities in a given jurisdiction are subject to regulations which are not dissimilar to the requirements for our operations in the United States and United Kingdom. We do not consider that these regulatory requirements adversely affect our competitive position.
See Part I, Item 1A-Risk Factors ‘Legal and Regulatory Risks’ for discussion of how actions by regulatory authorities or changes in legislation and regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate may have an adverse effect on our business.

12


About Willis

Employees
As of December 31, 2014 we had approximately 18,400 employees worldwide of whom approximately 3,500 were employed in the United Kingdom and 5,900 in the United States, with the balance being employed across the rest of the world. In addition, our associates had approximately 3,700 employees, all of whom were located outside the United Kingdom and the United States.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The executive officers of the Company as of February 20, 2015 were as follows:
Celia Brown - Ms. Brown, age 60, was appointed as an executive officer on January 23, 2012. Ms. Brown joined the Willis Group in 2010 and serves as the Willis Group Human Resources Director. Prior to joining the Willis Group, Ms. Brown spent over 20 years at XL Group plc where she held a number of senior roles. Ms. Brown served from 2006 to 2009 as the Executive Vice President, Head of Global HR and Corporate Relations at XL Group plc. Following XL Group plc, Ms. Brown formed an independent management consultancy, providing human resources services to not-for-profit, corporate and individual clients.
Dominic Casserley - Mr. Casserley, age 57, was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of Willis Group Holdings and as a member of the Board on January 7, 2013. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Casserley, was a senior partner of McKinsey & Company, which he joined in New York in 1983. During his 29 years at McKinsey, Mr. Casserley led the firm's Greater China Practice and its UK and Ireland Practice. Mr. Casserley had been a member of the McKinsey Shareholders Council, the firm's global board, since 1999 and for four years served as the Chairman of the Finance Committee of that board.
John Greene - Mr. Greene, age 49, has served as Chief Financial Officer of Willis Group Holdings since June 2, 2014. Mr. Greene joined Willis Group Holdings after more than eight years with HSBC Holdings, where he served as Chief Financial Officer for their global Retail Bank and Wealth Management business. Previously, Mr. Greene served at HSBC Holdings as Chief Financial Officer for HSBC Insurance and Chief Financial Officer for the Consumer & Mortgage Lending business. Prior to HSBC, he was with GE for twelve years in various roles, including Chief Financial Officer for GE Global Business Finance.
Stephen Hearn - Mr. Hearn, age 48, was appointed as an executive officer on January 1, 2012. Mr. Hearn joined the Willis Group in 2008 and was named Chairman and CEO of Willis Global in 2011, CEO of Willis Limited in 2012 and Group Deputy CEO in 2013. Since joining the Willis Group, Mr. Hearn has served as Chairman of Special Contingency Risk, Chairman of Willis Facultative and Chairman and CEO of Glencairn Limited. From 2009 until 2011 he led Faber & Dumas, Global Markets International and Willis Facultative. Prior to joining the Willis Group, Mr. Hearn served as Chairman and CEO of the Glencairn Group Limited and as President and CEO of Marsh Affinity Europe.
Todd Jones - Mr. Jones, age 50, was appointed as an executive officer and Chief Executive Officer of Willis North America on July 1, 2013. Mr. Jones joined Willis in 2003 as the North American Practice Leader for Willis’s Executive Risks Practice and served as the President of Willis North America from 2010 to 2013. Mr. Jones also served as a National Partner for the Northeast Region. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Jones held various leadership roles in the insurance brokerage industry. Before entering the brokerage industry, he was a financial analyst and corporate banker for a regional bank that is now part of Wells Fargo, focusing on the telecommunications industry.
David Shalders - Mr. Shalders, age 48, was appointed as an executive officer and Group Operations & Technology Director on November 4, 2013. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Shalders spent over a decade in senior operations and IT roles at the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, most recently as Global COO for Global Banking and Markets. Mr. Shalders also held roles as Head of London & Asia Operations and Head of Derivative Operations for NatWest at RBS.
Timothy D. Wright - Mr. Wright, age 53, was appointed as an executive officer in 2008 and in 2011 was appointed as CEO of Willis International. Mr. Wright served as Group Chief Operating Officer from 2008 to 2011. Prior to joining the Willis Group, he was a Partner of Bain & Company where he led their Financial Services practice in London. Mr. Wright was previously UK Managing Partner of Booz Allen & Hamilton and led their insurance work globally. He has more than 20 years of experience in the insurance and financial service industries internationally.



13


Willis Group Holdings plc


Item1A - Risk Factors
Risks Relating to our Business and the Insurance Industry
This section describes material risks affecting the Group’s business. These risks could materially affect the Group’s business, reputation, revenues, operating income, net income, net assets, liquidity and capital resources and ability to achieve its financial targets and, accordingly should be read in conjunction with any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Competitive Risks
Worldwide economic conditions could have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
Our business and operating results are materially affected by worldwide economic conditions. Current global economic conditions, including those associated with the Eurozone, coupled with low customer and business confidence may have a significant negative impact on the buying behavior of some of our clients as their businesses suffer from these conditions. Since 2008, many of our operations have been impacted by the weakened economic climate. A significant number of insolvencies associated with an economic downturn could adversely affect our brokerage business through the loss of clients or by hampering our ability to place insurance and reinsurance business. In addition, an increase in mergers and acquisitions can also result in the loss of clients. While it is difficult to predict the consequences of any further deterioration in global economic conditions on our business, any significant reduction or delay by our clients in purchasing insurance or making payment of premiums could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the potential for a significant insurer to fail, be downgraded or withdraw from writing certain lines of insurance coverages that we offer our clients could negatively impact overall capacity in the industry, which could then reduce the placement of certain lines and types of insurance and reduce our revenues and profitability. The potential for an insurer to fail or be downgraded could also result in errors and omissions claims by clients.
The credit and economic conditions of certain European Union countries remain fragile and may contribute to instability in the global credit and financial markets. If credit conditions worsen or financial market volatility increases in the Eurozone, it is possible that it could have a negative effect on the global economy as a whole, and our business, operating results and financial condition. If the Eurozone continues to deteriorate, there will likely be a negative effect on our European business, as well as the businesses of our European clients. Further, were the Euro to be withdrawn entirely, or the Eurozone were to be dissolved as a common currency area, the legal and contractual consequences for holders of Euro-denominated obligations would be determined by laws in effect at such time. A significant devaluation of the Euro would cause the value of our financial assets that are denominated in Euros to be significantly reduced. Any of these conditions could ultimately harm our overall business, prospects, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
We may not be able to fully realize the anticipated benefits of our growth strategy.
We have stated certain goals at our 2013 Investor Conference and our outlook for 2015. In order to achieve these goals, we are implementing certain revenue growth strategies and continue to strive to manage our cost base. For example, we announced a series of actions that include, among other things, our multi-year operational improvement program and initiatives to better connect Willis. In light of the potential operational risks associated with these new initiatives, we cannot be certain whether we will be able to realize benefits from current revenue-generating or cost-saving initiatives and ultimately realize our objectives. There can be no assurance that our actual results will meet these financial goals.
We do not control the premiums on which our commissions are based, and volatility or declines in premiums may seriously undermine our profitability.
We derive most of our revenues from commissions and fees for brokerage and consulting services and do not determine the insurance premiums on which our commissions are generally based. Commission levels generally follow the same trend as premium levels, as they are a percentage of the premiums paid by the insureds. Fluctuations in the premiums charged by the insurance carriers can therefore have a direct and potentially material impact on our results of operations. Due to the cyclical nature of the insurance market and the impact of other market conditions on insurance premiums, commission levels may vary widely between accounting periods. A period of low or declining premium rates, generally known as a 'soft' or 'softening' market, generally leads to downward pressure on commission revenues and can have a material adverse impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. A 'hard' or 'firming' market, during which premium rates rise, generally has a

14


Risk factors

favorable impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. Rates, however, vary by geography, industry and client segment. We have been and continue to be negatively impacted by soft market conditions across certain sectors and geographic regions. In addition, insurance carriers may seek to reduce their expenses by reducing the commission rates payable to insurance agents or brokers such as ourselves. The reduction of these commission rates, along with general volatility and/or declines in premiums, may significantly undermine our profitability.
Competition in our industry is intense, and if we are unable to compete effectively, we may suffer lower revenue, reduced operating margins and lose market share which could materially and adversely affect our business.
We face competition in all fields in which we operate, based on global capability, product breadth, innovation, quality of service and price. We compete with Marsh & McLennan and Aon, the two major global providers of global risk management services, as well as with numerous specialist, regional and local firms. Competition for business is intense in all of our business lines and in every insurance market, and Marsh & McLennan and Aon have substantially greater market share than we do. Competition on premium rates has also exacerbated the pressures caused by a continuing reduction in demand in some classes of business. For example, rather than purchase additional insurance through brokers, some insureds have been retaining a greater proportion of their risk portfolios than previously. Industrial and commercial companies increasingly rely upon their own subsidiary insurance companies, known as captive insurance companies, self-insurance pools, risk retention groups, mutual insurance companies and other mechanisms for funding their risks, rather than buy insurance. Additional competitive pressures arise from the entry of non-traditional market participants, such as banks, accounting firms and insurance carriers themselves, offering risk management or transfer services. If we are unable to compete effectively, we may suffer lower revenue, reduced operating margins and lose market share which could materially and adversely affect our business.
The loss of our Chief Executive Officer or a number of our senior management or a significant number of our brokers could significantly impede our financial plans, growth, marketing and other objectives.
The loss of our Chief Executive Officer, a number of our senior management or a significant number of our brokers could significantly impede our financial plans, growth, marketing and other objectives. Our success depends to a substantial extent not only on the ability and experience of our Chief Executive Officer, Dominic Casserley, and other members of our senior management, but also on the individual brokers and teams that service our clients and maintain client relationships. The insurance and reinsurance brokerage industry has in the past experienced intense competition for the services of leading individual brokers and brokerage teams, and we have lost key individuals and teams to competitors. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our ability to attract and retain additional highly skilled and qualified personnel and to expand, train and manage our employee base. We may not continue to be successful in doing so because the competition for qualified personnel in our industry is intense.
We face certain risks associated with the acquisition or disposition of businesses and lack of control over investments in associates.
In pursuing our corporate strategy, we may acquire or dispose of or exit businesses or reorganize existing investments. For example, we have a call option to acquire 100 percent of the capital of our associate, Gras Savoye. The success of our overall acquisition and disposition strategy is dependent upon our ability to identify appropriate opportunities, negotiate transactions on favorable terms and ultimately complete such transactions. Once we complete acquisitions or reorganizations there can be no assurance that we will realize the anticipated benefits of any transaction, including revenue growth, operational efficiencies or expected synergies. For example, if we fail to recognize some or all of the strategic benefits and synergies expected from a transaction, goodwill and intangible assets may be impaired in future periods.
In addition, we may not be able to integrate acquisitions successfully into our existing business, and we could incur or assume unknown or unanticipated liabilities or contingencies, which may impact our results of operations. If we dispose of or otherwise exit certain businesses, there can be no assurance that we will not incur certain disposition related charges, or that we will be able to reduce the overheads related to the divested assets.
We also own an interest in a number of associates where we do not exercise management control and we are therefore limited in our ability to direct or manage the business to realize the anticipated benefits that we can achieve if we had full ownership.
Investment in innovative product offerings may fail to yield sufficient return to cover their investment.
From time to time, we may enter new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There can be substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, including the investment of significant time and resources, the possibility that these efforts will be unprofitable, and the risk of additional liabilities associated with these efforts. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business and new products

15


Willis Group Holdings plc


and services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results for operations. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business. In addition, we can provide no assurance that the entry into new lines of business or development of new products and services will be successful.
We are continually developing and investing in new and innovative offerings that we believe will address needs that we identify in the market. Nevertheless, the ability of these efforts to produce meaningful value is dependent on a number of other factors, some of which are outside of our control. For example, we have invested substantial time and resources in launching The Willis Advantage under the belief that this exchange will serve a useful role to help corporations and individuals in the United States manage their growing health care expenses. But in order for The Willis Advantage to be successful, health care insurers and corporate and individual participants must deem it suitable to participate in, and such decisions are based on their own particular circumstances.
Our business performance and growth plans could be negatively affected if we are not able to effectively apply technology to drive value for our clients through technology-based solutions or gain internal efficiencies through the effective application of technology and related tools.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to develop and implement technology solutions that anticipate and keep pace with rapid and continuing changes in technology, industry standards and client preferences. We may not be successful in anticipating or responding to these developments in a timely and cost-effective manner, and our ideas may not be accepted in the marketplace. Additionally, the effort to gain technological expertise and develop new technologies in our business requires us to incur significant cost. Our competitors are seeking to develop competing technologies, and their success in this space may impact our ability to differentiate our services to our clients through the use of unique technological solutions. If we cannot offer new technologies as quickly as our competitors or if our competitors develop more cost-effective technologies, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to obtain and complete client engagements.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
Our compliance systems and controls cannot guarantee that we comply with all applicable federal and state or foreign laws and regulations, and actions by regulatory authorities or changes in applicable laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate may have an adverse effect on our business.
Our activities are subject to extensive regulation under the laws of the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and its member states, and the other jurisdictions around the world in which we operate. In addition, we own an interest in a number of associates where we do not exercise management control. Over the last few years, regulators across the world are increasingly seeking to regulate brokers who operate in their jurisdictions. Compliance with laws and regulations that apply to our operations is complex and increases our cost of doing business. These laws and regulations include insurance and financial industry regulations, economic and trade sanctions and laws against financial crimes, including client money and anti-money laundering, bribery or other corruption, such as the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, anti-competition and data privacy legislation. In most jurisdictions, governmental and regulatory authorities have the ability to interpret and amend these laws and regulations and impose penalties for non-compliance, including sanctions, civil remedies, monetary fines, injunctions, revocation of licenses or approvals, suspension of individuals, limitations on business activities or redress to clients. While we believe that we have substantially increased our focus on the geographic breadth of regulations to which we are subject, maintain good relationships with our key regulators and our current systems and controls are adequate, we cannot assure that such systems and controls will prevent any violations of any applicable laws and regulations.
Our business, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity may be materially adversely affected by actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and proceedings.
We are subject to various actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and other proceedings relating principally to alleged errors and omissions in connection with the placement of insurance and reinsurance in the ordinary course of business. Because we often assist our clients with matters, including the placement of insurance coverage and the handling of related claims, involving substantial amounts of money, errors and omissions claims against us may arise which allege our potential liability for all or part of the amounts in question.
Claimants can seek large damage awards and these claims can involve potentially significant defense costs. Such claims, lawsuits and other proceedings could, for example, include allegations of damages for our employees or sub-agents improperly failing to place coverage or notify claims on behalf of clients, to provide insurance carriers with complete and accurate information relating to the risks being insured or to appropriately apply funds that we hold for our clients on a fiduciary basis.

16


Risk factors

Errors and omissions claims, lawsuits and other proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business are covered in part by professional indemnity or other appropriate insurance. The terms of this insurance vary by policy year and self-insured risks have increased significantly in recent years. In respect of self-insured risks, we have established provisions against these items which we believe to be adequate in the light of current information and legal advice, and we adjust such provisions from time to time according to developments. Our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity may be adversely affected if in the future our insurance coverage proves to be inadequate or unavailable or there is an increase in liabilities for which we self-insure. Our ability to obtain professional indemnity insurance in the amounts and with the deductibles we desire in the future may be adversely impacted by general developments in the market for such insurance or our own claims experience.
We are also subject to actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and proceedings outside of errors and omissions claims. An example of material claims for which we are subject that are outside of the error and omissions claims context relate to those arising out of the collapse of The Stanford Financial Group, for which we acted as brokers of record on certain lines of insurance.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be ascertained and liabilities in indeterminate amounts may be imposed on us. It is thus possible that future results of operations or cash flows for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by an unfavorable resolution of these matters. In addition, these matters continue to divert management and personnel resources away from operating our business. Even if we do not experience significant monetary costs, there may also be adverse publicity associated with these matters that could result in reputational harm to the insurance brokerage industry in general or to us in particular that may adversely affect our business, client or employee relationships.
Accepting market derived income (MDI) may cause regulatory or other scrutiny, which may have a material and adverse effect on our business.
Insurance intermediaries have traditionally been remunerated by commission or fees paid by clients. Intermediaries also obtain revenue from insurance carriers. This is commonly known as market derived income or 'MDI'. MDI takes a variety of forms, including volume- or profit-based contingent commissions, facilities administration charges, business development agreements, and fees for providing certain data to carriers.
MDI creates various risks. Intermediaries have a duty to act in the best interests of their clients and payments from carriers can incentivize intermediaries to put carriers’ interests ahead of their clients. Accordingly, MDI may be subject to scrutiny by various regulators under conflict of interest, anti-trust, unfair competition, and anti-bribery laws and regulations. While accepting MDI is a lawful and acceptable business practice, and while we have established systems and controls to manage these risks, we cannot predict whether our position will result in regulatory or other scrutiny.
IT and Operational Risks
Data security breaches or improper disclosure of confidential company or personal data could result in material financial loss, loss of human capital, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
Computer viruses, hackers and other external hazards, as well as improper or inadvertent staff behavior could expose confidential company and personal data systems to security breaches. Additionally, one of our significant responsibilities is to maintain the security and privacy of our clients’ confidential and proprietary information and the personal data of their employees. These increased risks, and expanding regulatory requirements regarding data security, could expose us to data loss, monetary and reputational damages and significant increases in compliance costs.
With respect to our commercial arrangements with third-party vendors, we have processes designed to require third-party IT outsourcing, offsite storage and other vendors to agree to maintain certain standards with respect to the storage, protection and transfer of confidential, personal and proprietary information. However, we remain at risk of a data breach due to the intentional or unintentional non-compliance by a vendor’s employee or agent, the breakdown of a vendor’s data protection processes, or a cyber-attack on a vendor’s information systems.
We have experienced a number of data incidents, resulting from human error as well as attempts at unauthorized access to our systems, which to date have not had a material impact on our business, operations or clients.
We maintain policies, procedures and technological safeguards designed to protect the security and privacy of this information. However, we cannot entirely eliminate the risk of data security breaches, improper access to or disclosure of confidential company or personally identifiable information. Our technology may fail to adequately secure the private information we hold and protect it from theft, computer viruses, hackers or inadvertent loss. In such circumstances, we may be held liable to our clients, which could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue.

17


Willis Group Holdings plc


Further, data privacy, information security, identity theft, and related computer and internet issues are matters of growing public concern and are subject to frequently changing rules and regulations. Our failure to adhere to or successfully implement processes in response to changing regulatory requirements and customer expectations in this area could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation.
Interruption to or loss of our information processing capabilities or failure to effectively maintain and upgrade our information processing hardware or systems could cause material financial loss, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
Our business depends significantly on effective information systems. Our capacity to service our clients relies on effective storage, retrieval, processing and management of information. Our information systems also rely on the commitment of significant resources to maintain and enhance existing systems, develop and create new systems and products in order to keep pace with continuing changes in information processing technology or evolving industry and regulatory standards and to be at the forefront of a range of technology relevant to our business.
If the data we rely on to run our business were found to be inaccurate or unreliable or if we fail to maintain effective and efficient systems (including through a telecommunications failure, failure to replace or update redundant or obsolete computer hardware, applications or software systems or if we experience other disruptions), this could result in material financial loss, regulatory action, reputational harm or legal liability.
Our inability to successfully recover should we experience a natural disaster or other significant disruption to business continuity could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Our ability to conduct business may be adversely affected, even in the short-term, by a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our business and the communities where we are located. This may include a disruption caused by restricted physical site access, terrorist activities, disease pandemics, or outages to electrical, communications or other services used by our company, our employees or third parties with whom we conduct business. Although we have business continuity and disaster recovery procedures in place and insurance to protect against such contingencies, such procedures may not be entirely effective and any insurance or recovery procedures may not continue to be available at reasonable prices and may not address all such losses or compensate us for the possible loss of clients occurring during any period that we are unable to provide services. Our inability to successfully recover should we experience a natural disaster or other significant disruption to business continuity could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Certain of our businesses pose underwriting, advisory or reputational risks and can have a significant adverse impact on our financial results.
We provide a broad range of brokerage, reinsurance and risk management consulting services to our clients worldwide. In addition, our Willis Capital Markets & Advisory business provides advice to insurance and reinsurance companies on a broad array of merger and acquisition transactions as well as capital markets products, including acting as underwriter or agent for primary issuances, operating a secondary insurance-linked securities trading desk and engaging in general capital markets and strategic advisory work. These operations may pose certain underwriting, advisory or reputational risks to our business.
Financial Risks
Our outstanding debt could adversely affect our cash flows and financial flexibility.
We had total consolidated debt outstanding of approximately $2.3 billion as of December 31, 2014 and our 2014 interest expense was $135 million. Although management believes that our cash flows will be sufficient to service this debt, there may be circumstances in which required payments of principal and/or interest on this debt could adversely affect our cash flows and this level of indebtedness may:
require us to dedicate a significant portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, thereby reducing the availability of cash flow to fund capital expenditures, to pursue other acquisitions or investments, to pay dividends and for general corporate purposes;
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic conditions, including if we borrow at variable interest rates, which makes us vulnerable to increases in interest rates generally;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes or challenges relating to our business and industry; and
put us at a competitive disadvantage against competitors who have less indebtedness or are in a more favorable

18


Risk factors

position to access additional capital resources.
The terms of our current financings also include certain limitations. For example, the agreements relating to the debt arrangements and credit facilities contain numerous operating and financial covenants, including requirements to maintain minimum ratios of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated cash interest expense and maximum levels of consolidated funded indebtedness in relation to consolidated EBITDA, in each case subject to certain adjustments.
A failure to comply with the restrictions under our credit facilities and outstanding notes could result in a default under the financing obligations or could require us to obtain waivers from our lenders for failure to comply with these restrictions. The occurrence of a default that remains uncured or the inability to secure a necessary consent or waiver could cause our obligations with respect to our debt to be accelerated and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our pension liabilities may increase which could require us to make additional cash contributions to our pension plans reducing the cash available for other uses.
We have two principal defined benefit plans: one in the United Kingdom and the other in the United States, and in addition, we have several smaller defined benefit pension plans in certain other countries in which we operate.
In 2012, we agreed a revised funding strategy with the UK plan's trustee under which we are committed to make additional cash contributions in the event that our adjusted EBITDA exceeds certain thresholds, or we make exceptional returns for our shareholders, including share buybacks or special dividends. As a result, we may be committed to make additional contributions through to 2017 based on the prior year's performance. During 2015, we will be required to negotiate a new funding arrangement which may change the contributions we are required to make during 2015 and beyond.
Total cash contributions, excluding employees’ salary sacrifice contributions, to these defined benefit pension plans in 2014 were $112 million. In 2015, the Company currently expects to make cash contributions of approximately $116 million, including exceptional returns, to these pension plans, although we may elect to contribute more. Future estimates are based on certain assumptions, including discount rates, interest rates, mortality, fair value of assets and expected return on plan assets.
We have taken actions to manage our pension liabilities, including closing our UK and US plans to new participants and restricting final pensionable salaries. Future benefit accruals in the US pension plan were also stopped, or frozen, on May 15, 2009. Nevertheless, the determination of pension expense and pension funding is based on a variety of rules and regulations. Changes in these rules and regulations could impact the calculation of pension plan liabilities and the valuation of pension plan assets. They may also result in higher pension costs, additional financial statement disclosure, and accelerate and increase the need to fully fund our pension plans through increased cash contributions. Further, a significant decline in the value of investments that fund our pension plan, if not offset or mitigated by a decline in our liabilities, may significantly alter the values and actuarial assumptions used to calculate our future pension expense and we could be required to fund our plan with significant additional amounts of cash. In addition to the critical assumptions described above, our plans use certain assumptions about the life expectancy of plan participants and surviving spouses. Periodic revision of those assumptions can materially change the present value of future benefits and therefore the funded status of the plans and the resulting periodic pension expense. Changes in our pension benefit obligations, the related net periodic costs or credits, and the required level of future cash contributions, may occur in the future due to any variance of actual results from our assumptions and changes in the number of participating employees. The need to make additional cash contributions may reduce our financial flexibility and increase liquidity risk by reducing the cash available to meet our other obligations, including the payment obligations under our credit facilities and other long-term debt, or other needs of our business.
We could incur substantial losses, including with respect to our own cash and fiduciary cash held on behalf of insurance companies and clients, if one of the financial institutions we use in our operations failed.
We maintain significant cash balances at various US depository institutions that are significantly in excess of the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. We also maintain significant cash balances in foreign financial institutions. A significant portion of this cash is fiduciary cash held on behalf of insurance companies or clients. If one or more of the institutions in which we maintain significant cash balances were to fail, our ability to access these funds might be temporarily or permanently limited, and we could face a material liquidity problem and potentially material financial losses. We would also be liable to claims made by the insurance companies or our clients regarding the fiduciary cash held on their behalf.



19


Willis Group Holdings plc


A downgrade to our corporate credit rating and the credit ratings of our outstanding debt may adversely affect our borrowing costs and financial flexibility and, under certain circumstances, may require us to offer to buy back some of our outstanding debt.
A downgrade in our corporate credit rating or the credit ratings of our debt would increase our borrowing costs including those under our credit facilities, and reduce our financial flexibility. In addition, certain downgrades would trigger a step-up in interest rates under the indentures for our 6.200% senior notes due 2017 and our 7.000% senior notes due 2019, which would increase our interest expense. If we need to raise capital in the future, any credit rating downgrade could negatively affect our financing costs or access to financing sources. This may in turn impact the assumptions when performing our goodwill impairment testing which may reduce the excess of fair value over carrying value of the reporting units.
In addition, under the indenture for our 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and our 6.125% senior notes due 2043, if we experience a ratings decline together with a change of control event, we would be required to offer to purchase our 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and our 6.125% senior notes due 2043 from holders unless we had previously redeemed those notes. We may not have sufficient funds available or access to funding to repurchase tendered notes in that event, which could result in a default under the notes. Any future debt that we incur may contain covenants regarding repurchases in the event of a change of control triggering event.
We are a holding company and, therefore, may not be able to receive dividends or other distributions in needed amounts from our subsidiaries.
Willis Group Holdings is a holding company that conducts no business of its own. We are dependent upon dividends and other payments from our operating subsidiaries to meet our obligations for paying principal and interest on outstanding debt obligations, for paying dividends to shareholders and for corporate expenses. Legal and regulatory restrictions, foreign exchange controls, as well as operating requirements of our subsidiaries, may limit our ability to obtain cash from these subsidiaries. For example, Willis Limited, our UK brokerage subsidiary regulated by the FCA, is currently required to maintain $126 million in unencumbered and available funds, of which at least $79 million must be in cash, for regulatory purposes. In the event our operating subsidiaries are unable to pay dividends and make other payments to Willis Group Holdings, we may not be able to service debt, pay obligations or pay dividends on ordinary shares.
If our goodwill becomes impaired, we may be required to record significant charges to earnings, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings.
We have a substantial amount of goodwill on our balance sheet as a result of acquisitions we have completed. We review goodwill for impairment annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. Application of the impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assignment of assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting units and determination of fair value of each reporting unit. Notwithstanding the fact that we recognized an impairment charge in fiscal year 2012 for our North American reporting unit, the risk remains that a significant deterioration in a key estimate or assumption or a less significant deterioration to a combination of assumptions or the sale of a part of a reporting unit could result in an impairment charge in the future, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings.
For further information on our testing for goodwill impairment, see ‘Critical Accounting Estimates’ under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
International Risks
Our significant non-US operations, particularly our London market operations, expose us to exchange rate fluctuations and various risks that could impact our business.
A significant portion of our operations is conducted outside the United States. Accordingly, we are subject to legal, economic and market risks associated with operating in foreign countries, including devaluations and fluctuations in currency exchange rates; imposition of limitations on conversion of foreign currencies into pounds sterling or dollars or remittance of dividends and other payments by foreign subsidiaries; hyperinflation in certain foreign countries; imposition or increase of investment and other restrictions by foreign governments; and the requirement of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws.
We report our operating results and financial condition in US dollars. Our US operations earn revenue and incur expenses primarily in US dollars. In our London market operations, however, we earn revenue in a number of different currencies, but expenses are almost entirely incurred in pounds sterling. Outside the United States and our London market operations, we

20


Risk factors

predominantly generate revenue and expenses in the local currency. The table gives an approximate analysis of revenues and expenses by currency in 2014.
 
US
Dollars
 
Pounds
Sterling
 Euros 
Other
currencies
Revenues58% 8% 13% 21%
Expenses46% 25% 9% 20%

Because of devaluations and fluctuations in currency exchange rates or the imposition of limitations on conversion of foreign currencies into US dollars, we are subject to currency translation exposure on the profits of our operations, in addition to economic exposure. Furthermore, the mismatch between pounds sterling revenues and expenses, together with any net sterling balance sheet position we hold in our US dollar denominated London market operations, creates an exchange exposure.
For example, as the pound sterling strengthens, the US dollars required to be translated into pounds sterling to cover the net sterling expenses increase, which then causes our results to be negatively impacted. However, any net sterling asset we are holding will be more valuable when translated into US dollars. Given these facts, the strength of the pound sterling relative to the US dollar has in the past had a material negative impact on our reported results. This risk could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flow and results of operations in the future.
Additionally, as at December 31, 2014, we are using the SICAD I rate of approximately 12 Venezuelan Bolivars per US Dollar to report our Venezuelan financial position, following devaluation from the official rate of approximately six Bolivars per US dollar. We cannot predict whether there will be a further devaluation of the Venezuelan currency or whether the use of the SICAD I rate will continue to be supported. As at December 31, 2014 we have approximately $22 million of net monetary assets that are denominated in the Venezuela Bolivar.
Where needed, we deploy a hedging strategy to mitigate part of our operating exposure to exchange rate movements, but such mitigating attempts may not be successful. For more information on this strategy, see Part II Item 8 - 'Note 24 Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities'.
In conducting our businesses around the world, we are subject to political, economic, legal, market, nationalization, operational and other risks that are inherent in operating in many countries.
In conducting our businesses and maintaining and supporting our global operations, we are subject to political, economic, legal, market, nationalization, operational and other risks. Our businesses and operations continue to expand into new regions throughout the world, including emerging markets. The possible effects of economic and financial disruptions throughout the world could have an adverse impact on our businesses. These risks include:
the general economic and political conditions in foreign countries,
the imposition of controls or limitations on the conversion of foreign currencies or remittance of dividends and other payments by foreign subsidiaries;
the imposition of sanctions by both the United States and foreign governments;
imposition of withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments from subsidiaries;
imposition or increase of investment and other restrictions by foreign governments;
the price of commodities, such as oil;
fluctuations in our tax rate;
difficulties in controlling operations and monitoring employees in geographically dispersed and culturally diverse locations;
the practical challenge and costs of complying, or monitoring compliance, with a wide variety of foreign laws (some of which may conflict with US or other sources of law), laws and regulations applicable to insurance brokers and US business operations abroad, including rules relating to the conduct of business, trade sanctions administered by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control, the EU, the UK and the UN, and the requirements of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as well as other anti-bribery and corruption rules and requirements in the countries in which we operate; and

21


Willis Group Holdings plc


the practical challenge and costs of complying with local regulation for our operating subsidiaries across the globe.
Legislative and regulatory action could materially and adversely affect us and our effective tax rate may increase.
There is uncertainty regarding the tax policies of the jurisdictions where we operate (which include the potential legislative actions described below), and our tax rate may increase and any such increase may be material. Additionally, the tax laws of Ireland and other jurisdictions could change in the future, and such changes could cause a material change in our effective tax rate. For example, legislative action may be taken by the US Congress which, if ultimately enacted, could override tax treaties upon which we rely or could broaden the circumstances under which we would be considered a US resident, each of which could materially and adversely affect our effective tax rate and cash tax position. We cannot predict the outcome of any specific legislative proposals. However, if proposals were enacted that had the effect of limiting our ability to take advantage of tax treaties between Ireland and other jurisdictions (including the United States), we could be subjected to increased taxation. In addition, any future amendments to the current income tax treaties between Ireland and other jurisdictions could subject us to increased taxation.
Irish law differs from the laws in effect in the United States and may afford less protection to holders of our securities.
It may not be possible to enforce court judgments obtained in the United States against us in Ireland based on the civil liability provisions of the US federal or state securities laws. In addition, there is some uncertainty as to whether the courts of Ireland would recognize or enforce judgments of US courts obtained against us or our directors or officers based on the civil liabilities provisions of the US federal or state securities laws or hear actions against us or those persons based on those laws. We have been advised that the United States currently does not have a treaty with Ireland providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. Therefore, a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any US federal or state court based on civil liability, whether or not based solely on US federal or state securities laws, would not be directly enforceable in Ireland. While not directly enforceable, it is possible for a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any US federal or state court based on civil liability to be enforced in Ireland through common law rules. However, this process is subject to numerous established principles and would involve the commencement of a new set of proceedings in Ireland to enforce the judgment.
As an Irish company, Willis Group Holdings is currently governed by the Irish Companies Acts 1963-2013. In late 2014, a new Companies Act (the “2014 Act”) was passed by both houses of the Irish parliament and is expected to apply to all companies including Willis Group Holdings from June 1, 2015. In addition to introducing new provisions, the 2014 Act carries over many of the existing rules applicable to Irish companies which differ in some material respects from laws generally applicable to US corporations and shareholders, including, among others, differences relating to interested director and officer transactions and shareholder lawsuits. Likewise, under the current regime and the 2014 Act, the duties of directors and officers of an Irish company generally are owed to the company only. Shareholders of Irish companies generally do not have a personal right of action against directors or officers of the company and may exercise such rights of action on behalf of the Company only in limited circumstances. Accordingly, holders of Willis Group Holdings securities may have more difficulty protecting their interests than would holders of securities of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction of the United States.


Item 1B — Unresolved Staff Comments
The Company had no unresolved comments from the SEC’s staff.

22


Properties

Item 2 — Properties
We own and lease a number of properties for use as offices throughout the world and believe that our properties are generally suitable and adequate for the purposes for which they are used. The principal properties are located in the United Kingdom and the United States. Willis maintains over 3.9 million square feet of space worldwide.

London
In London we occupy a prime site comprising 491,000 square feet spread over a 28-story tower and adjoining 10-story building. We have a 25-year lease on this property which expires June 2032. We sub-let approximately 17,500 square feet of the 28-story tower to a third party. We also sub-let the 10-story adjoining building.

North America
In North America, outside of New York, Chicago and Nashville, we lease approximately 1.3 million square feet around 100 locations.

New York
In New York, we occupy 205,000 square feet of office space at Brookfield Place under a 20-year lease, expiring September 2026.

Chicago
In Chicago, we occupy 140,000 square feet at the Willis Tower under a lease expiring February 2025. We sub-let approximately 17,000 square feet to a third party.

Nashville
In Nashville, we occupy 170,000 square feet under a lease expiring April 2026.

Rest of World
Outside of North America and London we lease approximately 1.4 million square feet of office space in over 200 locations. Two of our properties in Ipswich, United Kingdom have liens on the land and buildings in connection with a revolving credit facility.
Item 3 — Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to various actual and potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings relating principally to alleged errors and omissions in connection with the placement of insurance and reinsurance. Similar to other corporations, the Company is also subject to a variety of other claims, including those relating to the Company’s employment practices. Some of the claims, lawsuits and other proceedings seek damages in amounts which could, if assessed, be significant.
Errors and omissions claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business are covered in part by professional indemnity or other appropriate insurance. The terms of this insurance vary by policy year and self-insured risks have increased significantly in recent years. Regarding self-insured risks, the Company has established provisions which are believed to be adequate in the light of current information and legal advice, and the Company adjusts such provisions from time to time according to developments.
On the basis of current information, the Company does not expect that the actual claims, lawsuits and other proceedings to which the Company is subject, or potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings relating to matters of which it is aware, will ultimately have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Nonetheless, given the large or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these actions, and the inherent unpredictability of litigation and

23


Willis Group Holdings plc


disputes with insurance companies, it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.
The material actual or potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings, of which the Company is currently aware, are as follows:
Stanford Financial Group Litigation
The Company has been named as a defendant in 13 similar lawsuits relating to the collapse of The Stanford Financial Group (‘Stanford’), for which Willis of Colorado, Inc. acted as broker of record on certain lines of insurance. The complaints in these actions generally allege that the defendants actively and materially aided Stanford’s alleged fraud by providing Stanford with certain letters regarding coverage that they knew would be used to help retain or attract actual or prospective Stanford client investors. The complaints further allege that these letters, which contain statements about Stanford and the insurance policies that the defendants placed for Stanford, contained untruths and omitted material facts and were drafted in this manner to help Stanford promote and sell its allegedly fraudulent certificates of deposit.
The 13 actions are as follows:
Troice, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:9-CV-1274-N, was filed on July 2, 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and a Willis associate, among others. On April 1, 2011, plaintiffs filed the operative Third Amended Class Action Complaint individually and on behalf of a putative, worldwide class of Stanford investors, adding Willis Limited as a defendant and alleging claims under Texas statutory and common law and seeking damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages and costs. On May 2, 2011, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the Third Amended Class Action Complaint, arguing, inter alia, that the plaintiffs’ claims are precluded by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (‘SLUSA’).
On May 10, 2011, the court presiding over the Stanford-related actions in the Northern District of Texas entered an order providing that it would consider the applicability of SLUSA to the Stanford-related actions based on the decision in a separate Stanford action not involving a Willis entity, Roland v. Green, Civil Action No. 3:10-CV-0224-N. On August 31, 2011, the court issued its decision in Roland, dismissing that action with prejudice under SLUSA.
On October 27, 2011, the court in Troice entered an order (i) dismissing with prejudice those claims asserted in the Third Amended Class Action Complaint on a class basis on the grounds set forth in the Roland decision discussed above and (ii) dismissing without prejudice those claims asserted in the Third Amended Class Action Complaint on an individual basis. Also on October 27, 2011, the court entered a final judgment in the action.
On October 28, 2011, the plaintiffs in Troice filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Subsequently, Troice, Roland and a third action captioned Troice, et al. v. Proskauer Rose LLP, Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-01600-N, which also was dismissed on the grounds set forth in the Roland decision discussed above and on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, were consolidated for purposes of briefing and oral argument. Following the completion of briefing and oral argument, on March 19, 2012, the Fifth Circuit reversed and remanded the actions. On April 2, 2012, the defendants-appellees filed petitions for rehearing en banc. On April 19, 2012, the petitions for rehearing en banc were denied. On July 18, 2012, defendants-appellees filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court regarding the Fifth Circuit's reversal in Troice. On January 18, 2013, the Supreme Court granted our petition. Opening briefs were filed on May 3, 2013 and the Supreme Court heard oral argument on October 7, 2013. On February 26, 2014, the Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit’s decision.
On March 19, 2014, the plaintiffs in Troice filed a Motion to Defer Resolution of Motions to Dismiss, to Compel Rule 26(f) Conference and For Entry of Scheduling Order. That motion has now been fully briefed by the parties and awaits disposition by the court.
On March 25, 2014, the parties in Troice and the Janvey, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al. action discussed below stipulated to the consolidation of the two actions for pre-trial purposes under Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On March 28, 2014, the Court “so ordered” that stipulation and, thus, consolidated Troice and Janvey for pre-trial purposes under Rule 42(a).
On September 16, 2014, the court (a) denied the plaintiffs’ request to defer resolution of the defendants’ motions to dismiss, but granted the plaintiffs’ request to enter a scheduling order; (b) requested the submission of supplemental briefing by all parties on the defendants’ motions to dismiss, which the parties submitted on September 30, 2014; and (c) entered an order

24


Legal proceedings


setting a schedule for briefing and discovery regarding plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, which schedule, among other things, provides for the submission of the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification (following the completion of briefing and discovery) on April 20, 2015.
On December 15, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motions to dismiss. On January 30, 2015, the defendants answered the Third Amended Class Action Complaint.
Ranni v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 9-22085, was filed on July 17, 2009 against Willis Group Holdings plc and Willis of Colorado, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The complaint was filed on behalf of a putative class of Venezuelan and other South American Stanford investors and alleges claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and Rule 10b-5 thereunder) and Florida statutory and common law and seeks damages in an amount to be determined at trial. On October 6, 2009, Ranni was transferred, for consolidation or coordination with other Stanford-related actions (including Troice), to the Northern District of Texas by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the ‘JPML’). The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Ranni. On August 26, 2014, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice.

Canabal, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:9-CV-1474-D, was filed on August 6, 2009 against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate named as a defendant in Troice, among others, also in the Northern District of Texas. The complaint was filed individually and on behalf of a putative class of Venezuelan Stanford investors, alleged claims under Texas statutory and common law and sought damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. On December 18, 2009, the parties in Troice and Canabal stipulated to the consolidation of those actions (under the Troice civil action number), and, on December 31, 2009, the plaintiffs in Canabal filed a notice of dismissal, dismissing the action without prejudice.
Rupert, et al. v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2009C115137, was filed on September 14, 2009 on behalf of 97 Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Bexar County). The complaint alleges claims under the Securities Act of 1933, Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks special, consequential and treble damages of more than $300 million, attorneys’ fees and costs. On October 20, 2009, certain defendants, including Willis of Colorado, Inc., (i) removed Rupert to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this related action and (iii) moved to stay the action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On April 1, 2010, the JPML issued a final transfer order for the transfer of Rupert to the Northern District of Texas. On January 24, 2012, the court remanded Rupert to Texas state court (Bexar County), but stayed the action until further order of the court. On August 13, 2012, the plaintiffs filed a motion to lift the stay, which motion was denied by the court on September 16, 2014. On October 10, 2014, the plaintiffs appealed the court’s denial of their motion to lift the stay to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On January 5, 2015, the Fifth Circuit consolidated the appeal with the appeal in the Rishmague, et ano. v. Winter, et al. action discussed below, and the consolidated appeal is currently pending. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Rupert.
Casanova, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:10-CV-1862-O, was filed on September 16, 2010 on behalf of seven Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis Limited, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, also in the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleges claims under Texas statutory and common law and seeks actual damages in excess of $5 million, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Casanova.
Rishmague, et ano. v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2011CI2585, was filed on March 11, 2011 on behalf of two Stanford investors, individually and as representatives of certain trusts, against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc., Willis of Texas, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Bexar County). The complaint alleges claims under Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks special, consequential and treble damages of more than $37 million and attorneys’ fees and costs. On April 11, 2011, certain defendants, including Willis of Colorado, Inc., (i) removed Rishmague to the Western District of Texas, (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this related action and (iii) moved to stay the action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On August 8, 2011, the JPML issued a final transfer order for the transfer of Rishmague to the Northern District of Texas, where it is currently pending. On August 13, 2012, the plaintiffs joined with the plaintiffs in the Rupert action in their motion to lift the court’s stay of the Rupert action. On September 9, 2014, the court remanded Rishmague to Texas state court (Bexar County), but stayed the action until further order of the court and denied the plaintiffs’ motion to lift the stay. On October 10, 2014, the plaintiffs appealed the court’s denial of their motion to lift the stay to the Fifth Circuit. On January 5, 2015,

25


Willis Group Holdings plc


the Fifth Circuit consolidated the appeal with the appeal in the Rupert action, and the consolidated appeal is currently pending. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Rishmague.
MacArthur v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2013-07840, was filed on February 8, 2013 on behalf of two Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc., Willis of Texas, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Harris County). The complaint alleges claims under Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks actual, special, consequential and treble damages of approximately $4 million and attorneys' fees and costs. On March 29, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and Willis of Texas, Inc. (i) removed MacArthur to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas and (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this related action. On April 2, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and Willis of Texas, Inc. filed a motion in the Southern District of Texas to stay the action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. Also on April 2, 2013, the court presiding over MacArthur in the Southern District of Texas transferred the action to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On September 29, 2014, the parties stipulated to the remand (to Texas state court (Harris County)) and stay of MacArthur until further order of the court (in accordance with the court’s September 9, 2014 decision in Rishmague (discussed above)), which stipulation was “so ordered” by the court on October 14, 2014. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in MacArthur.
Florida suits: On February 14, 2013, five lawsuits were filed against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis Limited and Willis of Colorado, Inc. in Florida state court (Miami-Dade County) alleging violations of Florida common law. The five suits are: (1) Barbar, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05666CA27, filed on behalf of 35 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $30 million; (2) deGadala-Maria, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05669CA30, filed on behalf of 64 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $83.5 million; (3) Ranni, et ano. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05673CA06, filed on behalf of two Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $3 million; (4) Tisminesky, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05676CA09, filed on behalf of 11 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $6.5 million; and (5) Zacarias, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05678CA11, filed on behalf of 10 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $12.5 million. On June 3, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. removed all five cases to the Southern District of Florida and, on June 4, 2013, notified the JPML of the pendency of these related actions. On June 10, 2013, the court in Tisminesky issued an order sua sponte staying and administratively closing that action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation and coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On June 11, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. moved to stay the other four actions pending the JPML's transfer decision. On June 20, 2013, the JPML issued a conditional transfer order for the transfer of the five actions to the Northern District of Texas, the transmittal of which was stayed for seven days to allow for any opposition to be filed. On June 28, 2013, with no opposition having been filed, the JPML lifted the stay, enabling the transfer to go forward. On September 30, 2014, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to remand in Zacarias, and, on October 3, 2014, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motions to remand in Tisminesky and de Gadala Maria. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaints in these actions.
Janvey, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:13-CV-03980-D, was filed on October 1, 2013 also in the Northern District of Texas against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis Limited, Willis North America Inc., Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate. The complaint was filed (i) by Ralph S. Janvey, in his capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver for the Stanford Receivership Estate, and the Official Stanford Investors Committee (the ‘OSIC’) against all defendants and (ii) on behalf of a putative, worldwide class of Stanford investors against Willis North America Inc. Plaintiffs Janvey and the OSIC allege claims under Texas common law and the court’s Amended Order Appointing Receiver, and the putative class plaintiffs allege claims under Texas statutory and common law. Plaintiffs seek actual damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages and costs. On November 15, 2013, plaintiffs filed the operative First Amended Complaint, which added certain defendants unaffiliated with Willis. On February 28, 2014, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint, which motions were granted in part and denied in part by the court on December 5, 2014. On December 22, 2014, Willis filed a motion to amend the court’s December 5 order to certify an interlocutory appeal to the Fifth Circuit, and, on December 23, 2014, Willis filed a motion to amend and, to the extent necessary, reconsider the court’s December 5 order. On January 16, 2015, the defendants answered the First Amended Complaint. On January 28, 2015, the court denied Willis’s motion to amend the court’s December 5 order to certify an interlocutory appeal to the Fifth Circuit. Willis’s motion to amend and, to the extent necessary, reconsider the December 5 order remains pending.



26


Legal proceedings


As discussed above, on March 25, 2014, the parties in Troice and Janvey stipulated to the consolidation of the two actions for pre-trial purposes under Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On March 28, 2014, the Court “so ordered” that stipulation and, thus, consolidated Troice and Janvey for pre-trial purposes under Rule 42(a).
Additional actions could be brought in the future by other investors in certificates of deposit issued by Stanford and its affiliates. The Company disputes these allegations and intends to defend itself vigorously against these actions. The outcomes of these actions, however, including any losses or other payments that may occur as a result, cannot be predicted at this time.


Item 4 — Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.


27


Willis Group Holdings plc


Part II
Item 5 —
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Share Data
Our shares have been traded on the New York Stock Exchange (‘NYSE’) under the symbol ‘WSH’ since June 11, 2001. The high and low sale prices of our shares, as reported by the NYSE, are set forth below for the periods indicated.
 
Price Range
of Shares
 High Low
2013: 
  
First Quarter$39.50
 $33.89
Second Quarter$43.02
 $37.86
Third Quarter$45.45
 $40.10
Fourth Quarter$47.22
 $42.15
2014: 
  
First Quarter$45.38
 $40.72
Second Quarter$44.49
 $40.47
Third Quarter$44.59
 $39.81
Fourth Quarter$45.66
 $39.11
2015:   
Through February 20, 2015$48.88
 $42.81
On February 20, 2015, the last reported sale price of our shares as reported by the NYSE was $47.75 per share. As of February 20, 2015 there were approximately 1,192 shareholders on record of our shares.
Dividends
We normally pay dividends on a quarterly basis to shareholders of record on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31. The dividend payment dates and amounts are as follows:
Payment Date$ Per Share
  
January 15, 2013$0.270
April 15, 2013$0.280
July 15, 2013$0.280
October 15, 2013$0.280
January 15, 2014$0.280
April 15, 2014$0.300
July 15, 2014$0.300
October 15, 2014$0.300
January 15, 2015$0.300

There are no governmental laws, decrees or regulations in Ireland which will restrict the remittance of dividends or other payments to non-resident holders of the Company’s shares.

28


Share data and dividends

In circumstances where one of Ireland’s many exemptions from dividend withholding tax (‘DWT’) does not apply, dividends paid by the Company will be subject to Irish DWT (currently 20 percent). Residents of the United States should be exempt from Irish DWT provided relevant documentation supporting the exemption has been put in place. While the US-Ireland Double Tax Treaty contains provisions reducing the rate of Irish DWT in prescribed circumstances, it should generally be unnecessary for US residents to rely on the provisions of this treaty due to the wide scope of exemptions from Irish DWT available under Irish domestic law. Irish income tax may also arise in respect of dividends paid by the Company. However, US residents entitled to an exemption from Irish DWT generally have no Irish income tax liability on dividends.
With respect to non-corporate US shareholders, certain dividends from a qualified foreign corporation may be subject to reduced rates of taxation. A foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends received from that corporation on shares that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, such as our shares. Non-corporate US shareholders that do not meet a minimum holding period requirement for our shares during which they are not protected from the risk of loss or that elect to treat the dividend income as ‘investment income’ pursuant to section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation regardless of our status as a qualified foreign corporation. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends if the recipient of a dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. This disallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. US shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules given their particular circumstances.
Total Shareholder Return
The following graph demonstrates a five-year comparison of cumulative total returns for the Company, the S&P 500 and a peer group comprised of the Company, Aon plc, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., Brown & Brown Inc., and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. The comparison charts the performance of $100 invested in the Company, the S&P 500 and the peer group on December 31, 2009, assuming full dividend reinvestment.



29


Willis Group Holdings plc


Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, no shares were issued by the Company without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The Company is authorized to buy back its ordinary shares, by way of redemption, and will consider whether to do so from time to time based on many factors including market conditions. The Company is authorized to purchase up to one billion shares from time to time in the open market (such open market purchases would be effected as redemptions under Irish law) and it may also redeem its shares through negotiated trades with persons who are not affiliated with the Company as long as the cost of the acquisition of the Company's shares does not exceed $611 million.
In the fourth quarter 2014, the Company bought back 244,300 shares at an average price of $40.86 for a total cost of approximately $10 million, on a trade date basis. The Company intends to buy back approximately $175 million in shares in 2015 to offset the increase in shares outstanding resulting from the exercise of employee stock options. The buybacks will be made in the open market or through privately-negotiated transactions, from time to time, depending on market conditions. The share buy back program may be modified, extended or terminated at any time by the Board of Directors.
Period:Total number of shares purchased Average price paid per share Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
        
October 1, 2014 to October 31, 2014244,300
 $40.86
 244,300
 $611,289,766
November 1, 2014 to November 30, 2014
 
 
 
December 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014
 
 
 
        
Total244,300
 

 244,300
  
The information under Part III, Item 12 regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference.




30


Selected Financial Data

Item 6 —Selected Financial Data
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data
The selected consolidated financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and the related notes and Item 7 — ‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’ included elsewhere in this report.
The selected historical consolidated financial data presented below as of and for each of the five years ended December 31, 2014 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (‘US GAAP’).
 Year ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
 (millions, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data 
  
  
  
  
Total revenues$3,802
 $3,655
 $3,480
 $3,447
 $3,332
Goodwill impairment charge
 
 (492) 
 
Operating income (loss)647
 663
 (225) 571
 789
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and interest in earnings of associates518
 499
 (337) 239
 587
Income (loss) from continuing operations373
 377
 (433) 219
 470
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 1
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings$362
 $365
 $(446) $204
 $455
Earnings per share on continuing operations — basic2.03
 2.07
 (2.58) 1.17
 2.68
Earnings per share on continuing operations — diluted2.00
 2.04
 (2.58) 1.15
 2.66
Average number of shares outstanding 
  
  
  
  
— basic178
 176
 173
 173
 170
— diluted181
 179

173
 176
 171
Balance Sheet Data (as of year end) 
  
  
  
  
Goodwill$2,937
 $2,838
 $2,827
 $3,295
 $3,294
Other intangible assets, net450
 353
 385
 420
 492
Total assets (i)
15,435
 14,800
 15,112
 15,728
 15,850
Total equity2,007
 2,243
 1,725
 2,517
 2,608
Long-term debt2,142
 2,311
 2,338
 2,354
 2,157
Shares and additional paid-in capital1,524
 1,316
 1,125
 1,073
 985
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity1,985
 2,215
 1,699
 2,486
 2,577
Other Financial Data 
  
  
  
  
Capital expenditures (excluding capital leases)$110
 $105
 $133
 $111
 $83
Cash dividends declared per share1.20
 1.12
 1.08
 1.04
 1.04
_________________

(i)
The Company collects premiums from insureds and, after deducting its commissions, remits the premiums to the respective insurers; the Company also collects claims or refunds from insurers which it then remits to insureds. Uncollected premiums from insureds and uncollected claims or refunds from insurers (‘fiduciary receivables’) are recorded as fiduciary assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Unremitted insurance premiums, claims or refunds (‘fiduciary funds’) are also recorded within fiduciary assets.

31


Willis Group Holdings plc


Item 7 —Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion includes references to non-GAAP financial measures as defined in Regulation G of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘SEC’). We present such non-GAAP financial measures, specifically underlying and organic non-GAAP financial measures, as we believe such information is of interest to the investment community because it provides additional meaningful methods of evaluating certain aspects of the Company’s operating performance from period to period on a basis that may not be otherwise apparent on a GAAP basis, and these provide a measure against which our businesses may be assessed in the future.
Underlying total revenues, underlying total expenses, underlying salaries and benefits, underlying other operating expenses, underlying operating income, underlying operating margin, underlying EBITDA, underlying net income and underlying earnings per diluted share (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "underlying measures") are calculated by excluding the impact of certain items and period over period movements in foreign currency, from the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Organic commissions and fees, total revenues, organic total expenses, organic salaries and benefits, organic other operating expenses, organic operating income, organic operating margin and organic EBITDA (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "organic measures") further adjust underlying measures to exclude the twelve month impact from acquisitions and disposals from the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Our methods of calculating these measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited. These financial measuresshould be viewed in addition to, not in lieu of, the consolidated financialstatements for the year ended December 31, 2014.
This discussion includes forward-looking statements, including under the headings 'Executive Summary', 'Liquidity and Capital Resources', and 'Critical Accounting Estimates'. Please see 'Forward-Looking Statements' forcertain cautionary information regarding forward-looking statements and a list offactors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted inthose statements.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Business Overview
We provide a broad range of insurance broking, risk management, and consulting services to our clients worldwide and during the period organized our business into three segments: Global, North America, and International.
For additional information regarding our business, see the more detailed discussion under Part I, Item 1 - 'Business' of this Form 10-K.

Market Conditions
Due to the cyclical nature of the insurance market and the impact of other market conditions on insurance premiums, commission revenues may vary widely between accounting periods. A period of low or declining premium rates, generally known as a ‘soft’ or ‘softening’ market, generally leads to downward pressure on commission revenues and can have a material adverse impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. A ‘hard’ or ‘firming’ market, during which premium rates rise, generally has a favorable impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. Rates, however, vary by geography, industry and client segment. As a result and due to the global and diverse nature of our business, we view rates in the aggregate.

Market conditions in our industry are generally defined by factors such as the strength of the economies in the various geographic regions in which we serve around the world, insurance rate movements, and insurance and reinsurance buying patterns of our clients.
Early in 2013, the reinsurance market was generally flat; however, as the year progressed we saw changing market sentiment driven by changes in the sources of capital and increases in capital supply in the reinsurance market, most notably within the North American catastrophe-exposed property market. The influx of third-party capital coupled with changes to reinsurance buying patterns and regulatory complexity is leading to growing complexity in the reinsurance market and a softening of prices.

32


Business discussion

In 2014 we noted a continuation of this trend, and signs of acceleration, towards softening reinsurance rates across almost all classes of business and geographies as positive 2013 results for traditional reinsurers exacerbated the growing supply of capital from third-party investors. In addition, for primary insurance companies, the ability to recognize primary rate increases may be coming to an end and consequently, rate flattening and even rate reductions are seen in many territories on primary insurance classes.
In the face of this challenging environment, we have adopted a strategy to: (1) invest selectively in growth areas, defined by geography, industry sector, and client segment and (2) better coordinate our business so as to bring our clients greater access to the Company's specialty areas and analytical capabilities, among other things. Our Global business provides specialist brokeragegrowth strategy also involves increasing our investment in, and consulting servicesdeployment of, our analytical capabilities.
Financial Performance
The following is a summary of our 2014 GAAP financial results:
Total revenues of $3,802 million increased by $147 million, or 4.0 percent over the prior year. This growth included $134 million increase in commissions and fees, led by our International segment which reported high single digit growth, and a net $26 million increase from the impact of acquisitions and disposals. Foreign exchange negatively impacted total revenues by $30 million.
Total operating expenses of $3,155 million increased by $163 million, or 5.4 percent over the prior year. This growth included $36 million of restructuring costs related to clients worldwide for risks arisingthe Operational Improvement Program, a $34 million net increase in expenses from specific industriesacquisitions and activities.disposals, and $6 million adverse foreign currency movements. The remaining increase was primarily due to higher salaries and benefits expense driven by increased headcount, pay reviews, and higher incentive charges, along with increased travel, accommodation and entertainment expenses, and systems costs.
Operating margin decreased 110 basis points to 17.0 percent from 18.1 percent in the prior year.
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings was $362 million, or $2.00 per diluted share, a decrease of $3 million, or 0.8 percent, from $365 million, or $2.04 per diluted share, in 2013.
Cash flows from operating activities were $477 million in 2014, a decrease of $84 million, or 15.0 percent from $561 million in 2013.
Our non-GAAP financial measures were as follows:
Underlying total revenues of $3,802 million increased $177 million, or 4.9 percent, over the prior year. Excluding the net $26 million increase from acquisitions and disposals, organic total revenues increased $151 million, or 4.2 percent over the prior year. This growth was driven by high commissions and fees growth in our International segment, supported by growth in Willis North America and Global. In addition to this, Other income increased $12 million primarily due to a settlement related to a specialty book of business within Global.
Underlying total expenses of $3,119 million increased $168 million, or 5.7 percent, over the prior year. Excluding the net $34 million increase from acquisitions and disposals, organic total operating expenses of $3,066 million increased $134 million, or 4.6 percent, over the prior year. This was primarily due to higher salaries and benefits expense, driven by increased headcount, pay reviews, and higher incentive charges, along with increased travel, accommodation and entertainment expenses, and systems costs.
The resultant organic operating margin decreased by 20 basis points to 18.2 percent from 18.4 percent in the prior year.

Operational improvement program
In April 2014, the Company announced an operational improvement program that would allow the Company to continue to strengthen its client service, realize operational efficiencies, and invest in new capabilities for growth.

33


Willis Group Holdings plc


The main elements of the program include the following:
movement of more than 3,500 support roles from higher cost locations to Willis facilities in lower cost locations, bringing the ratio of employees in higher cost versus lower cost near-shore and off-shore centers from approximately 80:20 to approximately 60:40;
net workforce reductions in support positions;
lease consolidation in real estate and reductions in ratios of seats per employee and square footage of floor space per employee; and
information technology systems simplification and rationalization.
The program began in the second quarter of 2014 and is expected to be complete by the end of 2017. The program is expecting to deliver cumulative cost savings of at least $420 million through 2017 and annual cost savings of approximately $300 million starting in 2018.
Actual cost savings of approximately $11 million were achieved in 2014, the estimated phasing of future cost savings is as follows: at least $60 million in 2015, approximately $135 million in 2016, and approximately $235 million in 2017. The estimated cost savings are before any potential reinvestment for future growth.
To achieve these savings, the Company expects to incur cumulative spend, including capital expenditure, amounting to approximately $410 million through the end of 2017. Program spend in 2014 was $36 million, with approximately $130 million expected for 2015 and the balance of approximately $240 million expected to be incurred in 2016 and 2017.
Total spend, actual savings, and timing may vary positively or negatively from these estimates due to changes in the scope, underlying assumptions, or execution risk of the restructuring plan throughout its duration.
The Company expects that about 70 percent of the annualized 2018 savings would come from role relocation and reduction, and about 30 percent of the savings from real estate, information technology and other areas.
To assist with the analysis of the effectiveness of the program the Company will provide the following metrics annually:
ratio of full time employees (FTEs) in higher cost geographies to lower cost near-shore and off-shore centers as at December 31, 2014 was 78:22 (March 31, 2014 ratio was 80:20);
indexed ratio of square footage of real estate per FTE as at December 31, 2014 was 98 (March 31, 2014 ratio of square footage of real estate per FTE = 100); and
indexed ratio of desks per FTE as at December 31, 2014 was 99 (March 31, 2014 ratio of desks per FTE = 100).
The restructuring costs of $36 million related to the Operational Improvement Program incurred in 2014 included:
$3 million of termination benefits in the North America segment relating to the elimination of 51 positions across a number of North America retail locations;
$5 million in the International comprise our retail operationssegment, of which approximately $3 million was termination benefits related to the elimination of 81 positions across the International network and provideapproximately $2 million spent on professional services to small, mediumsupport the program;
$11 million in the Global segment, including $10 million of termination benefits related to the elimination of approximately 181 positions from the Willis Insurance UK and major corporations.UK Reinsurance divisions, in addition to approximately $1 million of professional fees related to a study on process improvement; and
$17 million in Corporate and other, including approximately $16 million of professional fees, primarily related to advisory services, and approximately $1 million related to system implementation and other core resources supporting the program.
Acquisitions and Disposals
In January, 2015 the Company reached an agreement to acquire a majority interest in Miller Insurance Services LLP, a leading London-based wholesale specialist. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approval and is expected to close in the second quarter of 2015.
During the year ended December 31, 2014 we made the following material acquisitions in line with our strategy to invest in targeted acquisitions with a focus on earnings accretion, competitive position, and fit.

34


Business discussion

In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company acquired 75.8 percent of Max Matthiessen Holding AB and subsidiaries (collectively referred to as Max Matthiessen), a leading employee benefits adviser in Sweden, for cash consideration of $204 million.
In the second quarter of 2014, the Company acquired 100 percent of Charles Monat Limited and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as Charles Monat), a life insurance solutions adviser to high net worth clients based in Hong Kong, for cash consideration of $59 million. Additional consideration estimated at $29 million is payable in annual installments over the next five years, based on a multiple of EBITDA of the entities acquired, during the period from May 25, 2014 until September 2, 2019. This consideration has been assessed to have a fair value of $12 million at the date of acquisition.
During 2014 we have also disposed of a number of low growth offices and business from our North America reporting unit that no longer align strategically with the rest of the North America segment.

Non-GAAP financial measures
During 2014, we made changes to the non-GAAP financial measures that we use to provide additional meaningful methods of evaluating the Company’s operating performance replacing our adjusted measures with new underlying measures and introduced new organic non-GAAP financial measures.
Previously we excluded certain specified items from total expenses, salaries and benefits, other operating expenses, operating margin, operating income, net income (loss) and earnings per share to calculate adjusted total expenses, adjusted salaries and benefits, adjusted other operating expenses, adjusted operating margin, adjusted operating income, adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share.
In addition to these certain specified items, we exclude the period-over-period foreign currency movements to calculate our underlying non-GAAP financial measures and further exclude the twelve month impact from acquisitions and disposals to calculate our organic non-GAAP financial measures.
We believe that the understanding of the Company's performance and comparative analysis of our results is enhanced by our disclosure of the following non-GAAP financial measures. We use these and other measures to establish Group performance targets and evaluate the performance of our operations.
Our method for calculating these measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited.
Underlying measures
Our underlying non-GAAP measures are calculated by excluding certain items (as detailed below) from total revenues, total expenses, salaries and benefits, other operating expenses, operating income, net income (loss), and earnings per diluted share, respectively, the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Additionally, prior year total revenues, total expenses and net income (loss) and diluted earnings per share have been rebased to current period exchange rates to eliminate the impact of year over year foreign exchange movements.
The following items have been excluded from total revenues, total expenses, salaries and benefits, other operating expenses, operating income and net income (loss) as applicable:
(i)restructuring charges relating the Operational Improvement Program;
(ii)costs associated with the 2013 Expense Reduction Initiative;
(iii)fees related to the extinguishment of debt;
(iv)the additional incentive accrual recognized following the replacement of annual cash retention awards with annual cash bonuses which do not feature a repayment requirement;
(v)write-off of unamortized cash retention awards following the decision to eliminate the repayment requirement on past awards;
(vi)India joint venture settlement;
(vii)goodwill impairment charge;

35


Willis Group Holdings plc


(viii)valuation allowance against deferred tax assets;
(ix)write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance and associated legal fees arising in Chicago due to fraudulent overstatement of commissions and fees;
(x)insurance recoveries related to the fraudulent overstatement of commissions and fees;
(xi)foreign exchange loss from the devaluation of the Venezuelan currency; and
(xii)gains and losses on the disposal of operations.

Organic measures

Our organic non-GAAP measures are calculated by excluding the twelve month impact from acquisitions and disposals, together with the impact of certain items, including foreign currency, that are discussed above, from total revenues, total expenses, salaries and benefits, other operating expenses, operating income, respectively, the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

A reconciliation of reported total expenses, salaries and benefits and other operating expense, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying and organic total expenses, underlying and organic salaries and benefits and underlying and organic other operating expenses is as follows (in millions, except percentages):
2014 compared to 2013
 Salaries and benefits Other operating expenses Total expenses
 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013
Expenses, GAAP basis$2,314
 $2,207
 $659
 $636
 $3,155
 $2,992
Excluding:           
Restructuring costs
 
 
 
 36
 
Expense Reduction Initiative
 29
 
 12
 
 46
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt
 
 
 1
 
 1
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (3) 
 (2) 
 (6)
Underlying expenses$2,314
 $2,181
 $659
 $625
 $3,119
 $2,951
Less: net expenses from acquisitions and disposals33
 13
 12
 3
 53
 19
Organic expenses$2,281
 $2,168
 $647
 $622
 $3,066
 $2,932

(a)For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


36


Business discussion

A reconciliation of reported total expenses, salaries and benefits and other operating expense, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying and organic total expenses, underlying and organic salaries and benefits and underlying and organic other operating expenses is as follows (in millions, except percentages):
2013 compared to 2012
 Salaries and benefits Other operating expenses Total expenses
 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012
Expenses, GAAP basis$2,207
 $2,475
 $636
 $600
 $2,992
 $3,705
Excluding:      

    
Expense Reduction Initiative29
 
 12
 
 46
 
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt
 
 1
 
 1
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy
 252
 
 
 
 252
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor
 200
 
 
 
 200
Goodwill impairment charge
 
 
 
 
 492
India JV settlement
 
 
 11
 
 11
Insurance recovery
 
 
 (10) 
 (10)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance
 
 
 13
 
 13
Foreign currency movements (a)

 9
 
 
 
 9
Underlying expenses$2,178
 $2,014
 $623
 $586
 $2,945
 $2,738
Less: net expenses from acquisitions and disposals12
 1
 1
 
 14
 1
Organic expenses$2,166
 $2,013
 $622
 $586
 $2,931
 $2,737

(a)For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.

37


Willis Group Holdings plc


A reconciliation of reported total revenues and operating income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to underlying and organic total revenues, and underlying and organic operating income, is as follows (in millions, except percentages):
2014 compared to 2013
 2014 2013
Total revenues, GAAP basis$3,802
 $3,655
Excluding:   
Foreign currency movements (a)

 30
Underlying total revenue$3,802
 $3,625
Less: net revenue from acquisitions and disposals56
 30
Organic total revenue$3,746
 $3,595
    
Operating income, GAAP basis$647
 $663
Excluding:   
Restructuring costs36
 
Expense Reduction Initiative
 46
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt
 1
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (36)
Underlying operating income$683
 $674
Less: net operating income from acquisitions and disposals3
 11
Organic operating income$680
 $663
    
Operating margin, GAAP basis, or operating income as a percentage of total revenues17.0% 18.1%
Underlying operating margin, or underlying operating income as a percentage of underlying total revenues18.0% 18.6%
Organic operating margin, or organic operating income as a percentage of organic total revenues18.2% 18.4%

(a)
For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


38


Business discussion

A reconciliation of reported total revenues and operating income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to underlying and organic revenues, and underlying and organic operating income, is as follows (in millions, except percentages):

2013 compared to 2012
 2013 2012
Total revenues, GAAP basis3,655
 3,480
Excluding:   
Foreign currency movements (a)

 13
Underlying total revenue$3,655
 $3,467
Less: net revenue from acquisitions and disposals56
 2
Organic total revenue$3,599
 $3,465
    
Operating income (loss), GAAP basis663
 (225)
Excluding:   
Expense Reduction Initiative46
 
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt1
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy
 252
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor
 200
Goodwill impairment charge
 492
India JV settlement
 11
Insurance recovery
 (10)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance
 13
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (4)
Underlying operating income$710
 $729
Less: net operating income from acquisitions and disposals42
 1
Organic operating income$668
 $728
    
Operating margin, GAAP basis, or operating income as a percentage of total revenues18.1% (6.5)%
Underlying operating margin, or underlying operating income as a percentage of underlying total revenues19.4% 21.0 %
Organic operating margin, or organic operating income as a percentage of organic total revenues18.6% 21.0 %

(a)
For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.



39


Willis Group Holdings plc


A reconciliation of reported net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying and organic EBITDA, is as follows (in millions, except per share data):
2014 compared to 2013
 2014 2013
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings, GAAP basis$362
 $365
Excluding:   
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest11
 12
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax(14) 
Income taxes159
 122
Interest expense135
 126
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 60
Other (income) expense, net(6) (22)
Depreciation92
 94
Amortization54
 55
Restructuring costs36
 
Expense reduction initiative
 41
Fees relating to the extinguishment of debt
 1
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (35)
Underlying EBITDA$829
 $819
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions and disposals11
 11
Organic EBITDA$818
 $808

(a)
For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


40


Business discussion

A reconciliation of reported net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying and organic EBITDA, is as follows (in millions, except per share data):
2013 compared to 2012
 2013 2012
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings, GAAP basis$365
 (446)
Excluding:   
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest12
 13
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 (5)
Income taxes122
 101
Interest expense126
 128
Loss on extinguishment of debt60
 
Other (income) expense, net(22) (16)
Depreciation94
 79
Amortization55
 59
Expense reduction initiative41
 
Fees relating to the extinguishment of debt1
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy
 252
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor
 200
Goodwill impairment charge
 492
India JV settlement
 11
Insurance recovery
 (10)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance
 13
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (4)
Underlying EBITDA$854
 $867
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions and disposals43
 1
Organic EBITDA$811
 $866

(a)
For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


41


Willis Group Holdings plc



A reconciliation of reported net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings and reported earnings per diluted share, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying net income and underlying earnings per diluted share, is as follows (in millions, except per share data):
2014 compared to 2013
     Per diluted share
 2014 2013 2014 2013
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings, GAAP$362
 $365
 $2.00
 $2.04
Excluding:       
Operational Improvement Program27
 
 0.15
 
Venezuela currency devaluation13
 
 0.07
 
Expense reduction initiative
 38
 
 0.21
Fees relating to the extinguishment of debt
 1
 
 0.01
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 60
 
 0.34
Gain on disposal of operations(2) (1) (0.01) (0.01)
Impact of US valuation allowance21
 9
 0.12
 0.05
Dilutive impact of potentially issuable shares
 
 
 
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (34) 
 (0.19)
Underlying net income$421
 $438
 $2.33
 $2.45

2013 compared to 2012
     Per diluted share
 2013 2012 2013 2012
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings, GAAP$365
 $(446) $2.04
 $(2.58)
Excluding:       
(Gain) loss on disposal of operations(1) 3
 (0.01) 0.02
Expense reduction initiative38
 
 0.21
 
Fees relating to the extinguishment of debt1
 
 0.01
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt60
 
 0.34
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy
 175
 
 0.99
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor
 138
 
 0.78
Goodwill impairment charge
 458
 
 2.60
India JV settlement
 11
 
 0.06
Insurance recovery
 (6) 
 (0.03)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance
 8
 
 0.05
Impact of US valuation allowance9
 113
 0.05
 0.64
Dilutive impact of potentially issuable shares
 
 
 0.05
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (4) 
 (0.02)
Underlying net income$472
 $450
 $2.64
 $2.56

(a)
For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


42


Business discussion

REVIEW OF CONSOLIDATED RESULTS
The following table is a summary of our revenues, operating resultsincome (loss), operating margin, net income (loss) and diluted earnings per share (in millions, except per share data and percentages):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
REVENUES 
  
  
Commissions and fees$3,767
 $3,633
 $3,458
Investment income16
 15
 18
Other income19
 7
 4
Total revenues3,802
 3,655
 3,480
EXPENSES 
  
  
Salaries and benefits(2,314) (2,207) (2,475)
Other operating expenses(659) (636) (600)
Depreciation expense(92) (94) (79)
Amortization of intangible assets(54) (55) (59)
Goodwill impairment charge
 
 (492)
Restructuring costs(36) 
 
Total expenses(3,155) (2,992) (3,705)
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)647
 663
 (225)
Other income (expense), net6
 22
 16
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 (60) 
Interest expense(135) (126) (128)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES518
 499
 (337)
Income taxes(159) (122) (101)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES359
 377
 (438)
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax14
 
 5
NET INCOME (LOSS)373
 377
 (433)
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(11) (12) (13)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$362
 $365
 $(446)
      
Salaries and benefits as a percentage of total revenues60.9% 60.4% 71.1 %
Other operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues17.3% 17.4% 17.2 %
Operating margin (operating income (loss) as a percentage of total revenues)17.0% 18.1% (6.5)%
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations$2.00
 $2.04
 $(2.58)
Average diluted number of shares outstanding181
 179
 173


43


Willis Group Holdings plc


Consolidated Results for 2014 compared to 2013
Revenues
Total revenues by segment for the three years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 (in millionsare shown below (millions, except percentages):
2013 2012 2011      Change attributable to:
Year ended December 31,2014 2013 % Change Foreign
currency translation
 Acquisitions
and disposals
 
Organic
commissions and fees growth
(a)
Revenues 
Operating
Income
 
Operating
Margin
 Revenues 
Operating
Income (Loss)
 
Operating
Margin
 Revenues 
Operating
Income
 
Operating
Margin
         
Global$1,191
 $334
 28.0% $1,129
 $372
 32.9 % $1,082
 $352
 32.5%$1,386
 $1,358
 2.1% 0.9 % (0.2)% 1.4%
North America1,386
 269
 19.4% 1,313
 240
 18.3 % 1,323
 271
 20.5%1,365
 1,349
 1.2% (0.1)% (1.5)% 2.8%
International1,078
 181
 16.8% 1,038
 183
 17.6 % 1,042
 221
 21.2%1,016
 926
 9.7% (5.1)% 5.8 % 9.0%
Total Retail2,464
 450
 18.3% 2,351
 423
 18.0 % 2,365
 492
 20.8%
Corporate & Other
 (99) n/a
 
 (1,004) n/a
 
 (278) n/a
Total Consolidated$3,655
 $685
 18.7% $3,480
 $(209) (6.0)% $3,447
 $566
 16.4%
Commissions and fees$3,767
 $3,633
 3.7% (0.9)% 0.8 % 3.8%
Investment income16
 15
 6.7%  
  
  
Other income19
 7
 171.4%  
  
  
Total revenues$3,802
 $3,655
 4.0%  
  
  
Global_________________
(a)
Organic commissions and fees growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; and (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented. Our methods of calculating this measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited.

Our Global operations comprise Global Specialties, Willis Re, Placement,Total revenues of $3,802 million increased by $147 million, or 4.0 percent, in 2014 compared to 2013. This was primarily due to 3.7 percent growth in commissions and Willis Capital Markets & Advisory (WCMA)fees.
Total commissions and fees in 2014 were $3,767 million, up $134 million, or 3.7 percent, from $3,633 million in 2013. This increase was comprised of organic growth of $134 million, or 3.8 percent, and growth through acquisitions and disposals of $28 million, or 0.8 percent, partially offset by negative foreign currency movements of $30 million or 0.9 percent.
The foreign currency impact was as a result of the strengthening of the US dollar against a number of currencies that our commissions and fees are earned in, most significantly the Euro, Australian dollar and Brazilian real, partially offset by the year-on-year weakening of the US dollar against the Pound Sterling.
The following table sets out revenues, operating income,Global segment reported 2.1 percent growth in commissions and fees, comprising 1.4 percent organic growth and a 0.9 percent positive impact from foreign currency translation. This growth was partially offset by a net 0.2 percent decline from acquisitions and disposals primarily due to a disposal in third quarter 2013.
Organic commissions and fees growth of 1.4 percent was driven by strong new business growth and higher client retention levels compared with the year ago period, partially offset by the negative impact from declining insurance and reinsurance rates and significant construction projects in 2013 that did not recur in 2014.
The North America segment reported 1.2 percent growth in commissions and fees compared to 2013 including organic growth of 2.8 percent partially offset by 1.5 percent negative impact from the disposal of non-strategic low growth offices, and a negative 0.1 percent impact from foreign currency translation.
The International segment reported 9.7 percent growth in commissions and fees compared with 2013, comprising 9.0 percent organic growth and 5.8 percent positive impact from the acquisitions of Max Matthiessen and Charles Monat. This was partially offset by a 5.1 percent negative impact from foreign currency translation.
Organic commissions and fees growth by segment is discussed further in 'Review of Segmental Results', below.
Other income reported an increase of $12 million compared to 2013. This increase was primarily due to a $12 million settlement related to a specialty book of business within the Global segment.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits were $107 million, or 4.8 percent, higher in 2014 compared with 2013 and includes a net $20 million increase from acquisitions and disposals, $3 million of adverse foreign currency movements, and $29 million benefit from the

44


Business discussion

non-recurrence of 2013 expense reduction initiative costs. The remaining increase of $113 million was driven by increased headcount, pay reviews, and higher incentives.
Other Expenses
Other operating marginexpenses were $23 million, or 3.6 percent, higher in 2014 compared with 2013. This growth included a net $9 million increase from acquisitions and disposals, $2 million of adverse foreign currency movements, $12 million benefit from the non-recurrence of 2013 expense reduction initiative costs and marketing costs. The remaining increase of $25 million was primarily due to higher travel, accommodation and entertainment expenses, along with increased systems costs.
Depreciation expense was $92 million in 2014, compared with $94 million in 2013. The decrease of $2 million included $5 million benefit from non-recurrence of 2013 expense reduction initiative costs offset by $1 million of adverse foreign currency movements.
Amortization of intangible assets was $54 million in 2014, a reduction of $1 million compared to 2013. The decrease primarily reflects the ongoing reduction in the HRH acquisition amortization partially offset by the increased charge relating to the acquisition of Charles Monat and Max Matthiessen.
Restructuring costs related to our operational improvement program were $36 million in 2014, compared with $nil in 2013. This is discussed in further detail in the 'Operational improvement program' section in the executive summary section above.

Income Taxes
The tax rate for 2014 was 31 percent, compared with 24 percent for 2013. Both years were impacted by certain items and the continuing requirement to retain a valuation allowance against our US deferred tax assets. The increase in tax rate over the prior year is partly attributable to the US returning to a tax paying position for the three years ended2014 tax year.
After adjusting for certain items, as listed below, the tax rate for 2014 was 25 percent: 
a tax benefit of $1 million associated with the $14 million pre-tax expense arising in relation to the Venezuela currency devaluation;
a tax benefit of $9 million associated with charges incurred in relation to the Operational Improvement Program;
a tax expense of $10 million associated with pre-tax gains of $12 million related to business disposals;
an expense of $21 million relating to an increase in US valuation allowance. The increase is attributable to a change in the US deferred tax position following resolution of uncertain tax positions from prior periods.

Interest in Earnings of Associates, net of Tax

The majority of our interest in earnings of associates relates to our share of ownership of Gras Savoye, the leading broker in France. Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax, in December 31, 2014 was $14 million compared to $nil in 2013. The increase was primarily due to the non-recurrence of charges relating to the 2013 reorganization program and other non-recurring items, with improved underlying financial performance, in Gras Savoye.


45


Willis Group Holdings plc


Consolidated Results for 2013 (in millions,compared to 2012
Revenues
Total revenues by segment for 2013 and 2012 are shown below (millions, except percentages):
 2013 2012 2011
Commissions and fees$1,188
 $1,124
 $1,073
Investment income3
 5
 9
Total revenues$1,191
 $1,129
 $1,082
Operating income$334
 $372
 $352
Revenue growth5.5% 4.3% 8.6%
Organic commissions and fees growth (a)
5.6% 6.1% 6.6%
Operating margin28.0% 32.9% 32.5%
       Change attributable to:
Year ended December 31,2013 2012 % Change Foreign
currency translation
 Acquisitions
and disposals
 
Organic
commissions and fees growth
(a)
          
Global$1,358
 $1,303
 4.2 % (0.9)% 0.8% 4.3%
North America1,349
 1,281
 5.3 % (0.1)% 0.6% 4.8%
International926
 874
 5.9 % 0.1 % % 5.8%
Commissions and fees$3,633
 $3,458
 5.1 % (0.3)% 0.5% 4.9%
Investment income15
 18
 (16.7)%  
  
  
Other income7
 4
 75.0 %  
  
  
Total revenues$3,655
 $3,480
 5.0 %  
  
  
_________________
(a) 
Organic commissions and fees growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; and (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented.

Our methods of calculating these measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited.

Total revenues increased by $175 million, or 5.0 percent, in 2013 compared to 2012
Revenues. This was primarily due to 4.9 percent growth in organic commissions and fees, partially offset by a 0.3 percent negative impact from foreign exchange and a $3 million decrease in investment income due to continued falling yields on deposits.
Total commissions and fees in 2013 were $3,633 million, up $175 million, or 5.1 percent, from $3,458 million in 2012. This increase was due to organic growth of 4.9 percent and growth through acquisitions and disposals of 0.5 percent partially offset by negative foreign currency movements of $13 million or 0.3 percent.
Organic growth of 4.9 percent was driven by low double-digit new business growth tempered by lost business.
Commissions and fees were reduced by a net $9 million impact of two revenue recognition adjustments in the North America and International segments discussed below.
The Global segment reported 4.2 percent growth in commissions and fees, comprising 4.3 percent organic growth, a 0.8 percent positive impact from acquisitions and disposals, and a 0.9 percent negative impact from foreign currency translation. Organic commissions and fees growth of 4.3 percent was led by high single-digit growth in Reinsurance, where all the divisions reported positive growth. Global Specialties reported mid single-digit growth primarily due to strong growth from Financial and Executive Risk, and P&C and Construction.
The North America segment reported a 5.3 percent growth in organic commissions and fees, compared to 2012, comprising 4.8 percent organic commissions and fees growth, a 0.6 percent positive impact from acquisition of Avalon Actuarial Inc., and a 0.1 percent negative impact from foreign currency translation. Organic growth in commissions and fees was positively impacted by a $5 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in the North America Personal Lines business with the rest of the Group.
The International segment reported 5.9 percent growth in commissions and fees compared with 2012, comprising 5.8 percent organic commissions and fees growth and a 0.1 percent positive impact from foreign currency translation. Organic growth in commissions and fees included the negative impact of a $15 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in China with the rest of the Group.
Investment income in $1,1882013 at $15 million was $3 million lower than in 2012. Organic commissions and fees growth by segment is discussed further in 'Review of Segmental Results', below.
Salaries and Benefits

Salaries and benefits increased by $268 million, or 10.8 percent, in 2013 compared with 2012. Foreign currency movements lowered salaries and benefits by $9 million, or 0.4 percent.

46


Business discussion

In 2012 we recorded a $452 million charge as a result of the change in remuneration policy for future incentive awards and the elimination of the repayment requirement on past awards. Excluding the impact of this change and foreign currency movements, salaries and benefits were up by $193 million or 9.5 percent. This increase is primarily due to annual salary reviews, increased headcount from targeted investments, increased incentives from the change in remuneration policy and growth in commissions and fees, and an additional charge to increase the 401(k) match in North America. It also includes $29 million relating to the Expense Reduction Initiative that was undertaken in first quarter 2013.
Other Expenses
Other operating expenses were $64$36 million,, or 5.76.0 percent,, higher in 2013 compared with 2012. The $36 million increase includes organic$12 million of costs that were incurred in first quarter 2013 as part of our Expense Reduction Initiative.
The remaining $24 million increase was primarily due to higher business development costs, consulting and professional fees to assist us in our growth initiatives, and marketing costs.
Depreciation expense was $94 million in 2013, compared with $79 million in 2012. The increase of $15 million includes $5 million which was incurred in first quarter 2013 relating to the rationalization of property and systems as part of our Expense Reduction Initiative. The remaining $10 million increase is primarily due to a number of significant information technology related projects becoming operational during the year and the write-off of replaced systems and other assets
Amortization of intangible assets5.6 was $55 million in 2013, a reduction of $4 million compared to 2012. The decrease primarily reflects the ongoing reduction in the HRH acquisition amortization.
Goodwill impairment charge was $nil in 2013 (2012: $492 million). This was a non-cash charge recognized related to the impairment of the carrying value of the North America reporting unit's goodwill. For further information on our testing for goodwill impairment, see 'Critical Accounting Estimates', below.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
The Company incurred total losses on extinguishment of debt of $60 million during the year ended December 31, 2013. This was made up of a tender premium of $65 million, the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of $2 million and a credit for the reduction of the fair value adjustment on 5.625% senior notes due 2015 of $7 million.
Income Taxes

The effective tax rate on ordinary income for 2013 was 20 percent, compared with 25 percent for 2012. The effective tax rate on ordinary income is calculated before the impact of certain discrete items. Discrete items occurring in 2013 with a significant impact on the tax rate were:
an incremental US tax expense of $9 million recorded after the taking into account the impact of adjustments to the valuation allowance placed against US deferred tax assets, US costs of $16 million associated with the Expense Reduction Initiative, and US costs of $61 million associated with the extinguishment of debt;

further non-US costs of $30 million associated with the Expense Reduction Initiative that are generally relieved at a rate higher than the underlying rate;

a net benefit of $4 million associated with a reduction in the corporation tax rate being applied to temporary tax differences in the UK;

a net benefit of $7 million associated with a change in the recognition of unrecognized tax benefits outside of the US; and

a net expense of $1 million associated with tax on profits of prior periods to bring in line the Company’s tax provision to filed tax positions.
Including the impact of discrete items, the tax rate for 2013 was 24 percent. This compares to a tax charge of $101 million recorded on the net loss from continuing operations of $337 million in 2012.

47


Willis Group Holdings plc


Interest in Earnings of Associates, net of Tax

The majority of our interest in earnings of associates relates to our share of ownership of Gras Savoye, the leading broker in France. Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax, in 2013 was $nil compared to $5 million in 2012. The decline was mainly driven by lower net income recorded in Gras Savoye due to the costs recognized in relation to a reorganization program undertaken in the year designed to drive growth in revenues and operational efficiencies.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity

We believe that our balance sheet and strong cash flow provide us with the platform and flexibility to remain committed to our cash allocation strategy of:

investing in the business for growth;
value-creating merger and acquisition activity;
generating a steadily rising dividend; and
the repurchase of shares.

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash from operations, available cash and cash equivalents and amounts available under our revolving credit facilities, excluding the UK facility which is solely for use by our main regulated UK entity in certain exceptional circumstances, and the Willis Securities facility, which is solely used for regulatory capital and securities underwriting purposes only.
Our principal short-term uses of liquidity and capital resources are operating expenses, capital expenditures, dividends and repurchase of shares, funding defined benefit pension plans, and servicing of debt.
Our long-term liquidity requirements consist of the repayment of the principal amount of outstanding notes; borrowings under our 7-year term loan; and funding defined benefit pension plans as discussed below.
As at December 31, 2014 cash and cash equivalents were $635 million, a decrease of $161 million compared to December 31, 2013. Included within cash and cash equivalents is $545 million available for corporate purposes and $90 million held within our regulated UK entities for regulatory capital adequacy requirements.
Cash flows from operating activities fell to $477 million in 2014 from $561 million in 2013. In addition, $6 million was provided from the disposal of fixed and intangible assets (2013: $12 million), $134 million proceeds from the issue of shares (2013: $155 million), and $86 million proceeds from the disposal of operations (2013: $20 million).
As at December 31, 2014 there was $nil drawn down on all four of our revolving credit facilities (2013: $nil). During the year ended December 31, 2014, we made five drawings totaling $1,175 million and five repayments of $1,175 million on the Willis Securities facility.
The primary uses of funds during 2014 included $401 million cash payments of 2013 incentive awards, $210 million related to payments of dividends, $122 million cash contributions, including employees' salary sacrifice contributions, to our defined benefit pension schemes, capital expenditures of $113 million related to leasehold improvements, information technology and transformation projects, $241 million related to acquisitions, primarily Max Matthiessen Holding AB and Charles Monat Limited, and a $4 million deferred cash payment related to the partial acquisition of the remaining noncontrolling interest in our China operation in a prior period.
The Company is authorized to buy back its ordinary shares by way of redemption, and will consider whether to do so from time
to time based on many factors including market conditions. During 2014, the Company bought back 5,050,000 shares for a total cost of $213 million. In February 2015, Willis announced that it intends to buy back approximately $175 million in shares in 2015 to offset the increase in shares outstanding resulting from the exercise of employee stock options.
Based on current market conditions and information available to us at this time, we believe that we have sufficient liquidity to meet our cash needs for the next twelve months.

48


Business discussion

The impact of movements in liquidity, debt and EBITDA in 2014 had a positive impact on the interest coverage ratio and a positive impact on the leverage ratio. Both ratios remain well within the requirements of the revolving credit facility covenants.

Debt
Total debt, total equity and the capitalization ratio at December 31, 2014 and 1.0 percent growth2013 were as follows (in millions, except percentages):
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Long-term debt$2,142
 $2,311
Current portion of long-term debt$167
 $15
Total debt$2,309
 $2,326
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity$1,985
 $2,215
Capitalization ratio53.8% 51.2%
At December 31, 2014 the only mandatory debt repayments falling due over the next 12 months are $148 million outstanding on our 5.625% senior notes, scheduled repayments on our 7-year term loan totaling $17 million, and $1 million outstanding on our 3-year term loan.
Cash flow
Summary consolidated cash flow information (in millions):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Cash provided by operating activities 
  
  
Total net cash provided by operating activities$477
 $561
 $525
Cash flows from investing activities 
  
  
Total net cash used in continuing investing activities(276) (120) (172)
Cash flows from financing activities 
  
  
Total net cash used in continuing financing activities(323) (137) (291)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(122) 304
 62
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(39) (8) 2
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year796
 500
 436
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year$635
 $796
 $500
This summary consolidated cash flow should be viewed in addition to, not in lieu of, the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Cash Flow for 2014 compared to 2013
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2014 decreased by $84 million to $477 million compared with 2013.
The $477 million cash from acquisitionsoperations comprises net income of $373 million, net $257 million of non-cash adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities and disposals, most notably$150 million of negative working capital movements.
The non-cash adjustments included depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation and provisions for deferred income taxes.
Movements in working capital included $401 million of incentive payments and $122 million cash contributions (including $10 million for employees’ salary sacrifice) to our defined benefit pension schemes. Additionally, there was a $66 million increase in accounts receivable, as revenue recognized in 2014 was greater than cash collection, and $432 million positive movement in other liabilities which included incentives accrued during 2014 that will be paid in 2015.

49


Willis Group Holdings plc


The $84 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily driven by lower reported operating income, the non-recurrence of closed-out derivative contracts in the prior year, increased working capital and higher cash taxes paid.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities in 2014 was $276 million. This included capital expenditure of $113 million, cash used to purchase subsidiaries, intangible assets and other investments of $255 million partly offset by $6 million cash received from the sale of fixed and intangible assets and $86 million of proceeds from the disposal of operations.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities in 2014 was $323 million primarily due to dividends paid, including dividends paid to noncontrolling interests, of $227 million, $213 million to repurchase approximately five million shares and $15 million of mandatory repayments against the term loan offset by cash receipts of $134 million from the issue of shares.
Consolidated Cash Flow for 2013 compared to 2012
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2013 increased by $36 million to $561 million compared with 2012.
The $561 million cash from operations comprises net income of $377 million, net $313 million of non-cash adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities and working capital movements.
The non-cash adjustments included depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation, gain on derivative instruments, provision for deferred income taxes and the tender premium on early redemption of our debt, which is presented as a financing cash item.
Movements in working capital included $346 million of incentive payments and $150 million cash contributions (including $12 million for employees’ salary sacrifice) to our defined benefit pension schemes. Additionally, there was a $116 million increase in accounts receivable, as revenue recognized in 2013 was greater than cash collection, and $445 million positive movement in other liabilities which included incentives accrued during 2013 that will be paid in 2014.
The $36 million increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily driven by favorable movements in working capital versus the prior year.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities in 2013 was $120 million including, capital expenditure of $112 million, cash used to purchase subsidiaries, intangible assets and other investments of $44 million partly offset by $6 million cash received from the sale of fixed and intangible assets and $24 million of proceeds from the disposal of operations and the sale of the Company’s holding in a Spanish associate company.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities in 2013 was $137 million primarily due to total dividends paid, including dividends paid to noncontrolling interests, of $203 million, a net $72 million outflow in relation to the refinancing in the third quarter 2013, discussed below, and $15 million of mandatory repayments against the term loan offset by cash receipts of $155 million from the issue of shares.
The refinancing during 2013 resulted in a net cash outflow of $72 million which included: $521 million cash paid to repurchase $202 million of 5.625% senior notes due 2015, $206 million of 6.200% senior notes due 2017 and $113 million of 7.000% senior notes due 2019, the tender premium of $65 million and debt issuance costs of $8 million; this was primarily funded by $522 million cash inflow from senior notes issued, discussed earlier, and free operating cash flows.
Own funds
As of December 31, 2014, we had cash and cash equivalents of $635 million, compared with $796 million at December 31, 2013. Additionally, $1,222 million was available to draw under our revolving credit facilities at December 31, 2014, compared with $822 million at December 31, 2013.

50


Business discussion

Fiduciary funds
As an intermediary, we hold funds generally in a fiduciary capacity for the account of third parties, typically as the result of premiums received from clients that are in transit to insurers and claims due to clients that are in transit from insurers. We report premiums, which are held on account of, or due from, clients as assets with a corresponding liability due to the insurers. Claims held by, or due to, us which are due to clients are also shown as both assets and liabilities.
Fiduciary funds are generally required to be kept in certain regulated bank accounts subject to guidelines which emphasize capital preservation and liquidity; such funds are not available to service the Company’s debt or for other corporate purposes. Notwithstanding the legal relationships with clients and insurers, the Company is entitled to retain investment income earned on fiduciary funds in accordance with industry custom and practice and, in some cases, as supported by agreements with insureds.
As of December 31, 2014, we had fiduciary funds of $1.9 billion, compared with $1.7 billion at December 31, 2013.
Share buybacks

The Company is authorized to buy back shares, by way of redemption, and will consider whether to do so from time to time, based on many factors, including market conditions. The Company is authorized to purchase up to one billion shares from time to time in the open market (such open market purchases would be effected as redemptions under Irish law) and it may also redeem its shares through negotiated trades with persons who are not affiliated with the Company as long as the cost of the acquisition of Prime Professionsthe Company's shares does not exceed a certain authorized limit.

In February 2015, the Company announced that, during the year, it intended to buyback approximately $175 million of shares under this authorization, from time to time, depending on many factors including market conditions to offset the increase in second quarter 2013, partially offsetshares outstanding resulting from the exercise of employee stock options. The buybacks would be made in the open market or through privately-negotiated transactions, from time to time, depending on market conditions.

As of February 20, 2015 there remains approximately $611 million available to purchase ordinary shares under the current authorization.
The share buy back program may be modified, extended or terminated at any time by a 0.9 percent negative impact from foreign currency movements.the Board of Directors.
The 5.6 percent organic growthDividends
Cash dividends paid in commissions and fees was driven by strong new business growth and higher client retention levels2014 were $210 million compared with the year ago period, partially offset by lost business. Rates had no material impact on commissions$193 million in 2013 and fees.
Willis Re reported high single-digit growth, with North America leading the way with double-digit results. New business was strong across all three divisions and$185 million in 2012. In February 2015, we reported increased client retention levels compared todeclared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.31 per share, an annual rate of $1.24 per share, an increase of 3.3 percent over the prior year.12 month period.
Specialty reported mid single-digit growth, with solid performance in our Financial and Executive Risk, and P&C and Construction. Growth from new business was solid and we saw increased client retention levels compared to 2012.


51

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Willis Capital Markets & Advisory performed solidly but was down compared to the very strong result it recorded in 2012 relating to meaningfully higher volumes of advisory fees and catastrophe bond deals.
Client retention levels improved to 91.9 percent for 2013, compared with 90.3 percent for 2012.
Expenses
Total operating expenses of $857 million were $100 million, or 13.2 percent, higher for 2013 compared with 2012. Excluding the $8 million, or 1.1 percent, impact of favorable foreign currency movements, total operating expenses increased $108 million or 14.3 percent.
The year-on-year growth in expenses was primarily due to higher salaries and benefits as a result of increased incentives
from the change in remuneration policy and growth in commissions and fees. In addition, this increase also included the impact of the increase in headcount relative to the prior year, annual salary reviews and higher charges for share-based compensation.
Other expenses also increased compared to 2012 due to higher travel, accommodation and client entertaining costs to support business development and increased professional fees related to the strategic review of the segment.
Operating margin

Full year operating margin was 28.0 percent in 2013 and 32.9 percent in 2012. The decline was driven by the additional expenses discussed above, partially offset by solid commissions and fees growth.
2012 compared to 2011
Revenues
Commissions and fees of $1,124 million were $51 million, or 4.8 percent, higher in 2012 compared with 2011. Foreign exchange movements had a net 1.3 percent negative impact on commissions and fees; organic growth was 6.1 percent.
Organic growth included positive growth across Reinsurance, Global Specialties, Willis Faber & Dumas and WCMA, as strong new business and higher one-off transactions, primarily in WCMA, were partially offset by increases in lost business.
Organic growth in Global Specialties was led by strong performances from Energy, Marine, Financial Solutions and Construction Specialties reflecting single-digit net new business. This growth was partially offset by declines in Aerospace, which continued to be negatively impacted by competitive pricing and rate decreases.
Reinsurance reported mid single-digit growth in 2012, as growth in the International, Specialty and North America divisions was partially offset by the non-recurrence of a fee related to a 2011 profitability initiative. Rates had a modest positive impact on commission and fees in the year.
Willis Faber & Dumas also reported mid-single digit growth in 2012.WCMA is a transaction-oriented business and its results are more variable than some of our other businesses. In 2012 we reported significantly higher organic commissions and fees than in 2011. Growth in the WCMA business was positively impacted by a higher volume of advisory and catastrophe bond deals closing during the year.
Client retention levels declined to 90.3 percent for 2012, compared with 91.3 percent for 2011.
Operating margin

Operating margin was 32.9 percent in 2012 and 32.5 percent in 2011. The organic growth in commissions and fees discussed above, and lower defined benefit pension costs were offset by higher salary and benefit expense due to the impact of annual salary increases and new hires, higher production linked incentives and increases to discretionary costs.

52

Table of Contents

Business discussion

North America

Our North America business provides risk management, insurance brokerage, related risk services, and employee benefits brokerage and consulting to a wide array of industry and client segments in the United States and Canada. With around 80 locations, organized into seven geographical regions including Canada, Willis North America locally delivers our global and national resources and specialist expertise through this retail distribution network.

In addition to being organized geographically and by specialty, our North America business focuses on four client segments: global, large national/middle-market, small commercial, and private client, with service, marketing and sales platform support for each segment.

Construction
The largest industry practice group in North America is Construction, which specializes in providing risk management, insurance brokerage, and surety bonding services to the construction industry. Willis Construction provided these services to nearly 10,000 clients including approximately 20 percent of the Engineering News Record Top 400 contractors (a listing of the largest 400 North American contractors based on reported revenue). In addition, this practice group has expertise in professional liability insurance, controlled insurance programs for large projects and insurance for national homebuilders.

Human Capital
Willis Human Capital, fully integrated into the North America platform, is the Group's largest product-based practice group and provides health, welfare and human resources consulting, and brokerage services to all of our commercial client segments. This practice group's value lies in helping clients control employee benefit plan costs, reducing the amount of time human resources professionals spend administering their companies' benefit plans and educating and training employees on benefit plan issues.

Executive Risks
Another industry-leading North America practice group is Willis Executive Risks, a national team of technical professionals who specialize in meeting the directors and officers, employment practices, fiduciary liability insurance risk management, and claims advocacy needs of public and private corporations and organizations. This practice group also has expertise in professional liability, especially cyber risks.

Other industry practice groups
Other industry practice groups include Healthcare, serving the professional liability and other insurance and risk management needs of private and not-for-profit health systems, hospitals and physicians groups; Financial Institutions, serving the needs of large banks, insurers and other financial services firms; and Mergers & Acquisitions, providing due diligence, and risk management and insurance brokerage services to private equity and merchant banking firms and their portfolio companies.

International
Our International business comprises our operations in Western Europe, Central and Eastern Europe, Asia, Australasia, the Middle East, South Africa and Latin America.
Our offices provide services to businesses locally in nearly 120 countries around the world, making use of local expertise as well as skills, industry knowledge and expertise available elsewhere in the Group.

10

Table Of Contents

About Willis

The services provided are focused according to the characteristics of each market and vary across offices, but generally include direct risk management and insurance brokerage, specialist and reinsurance brokerage and employee benefits consulting.
As part of our ongoing strategy, we continue to look for opportunities to strengthen our International market share through acquisitions and strategic investments. A list of significant subsidiaries is included in Exhibit 21.1 to this document.

We have also invested in associate companies; our significant associates at December 31, 2014 were GS & Cie Groupe ('Gras Savoye'), a French organization (30 percent holding) and Al-Futtaim Willis Co. LLC, organized under the laws of Dubai (49 percent holding). In connection with many of our investments we retain the right to increase our ownership over time, typically to a majority or 100 percent ownership position.
We believe the combined total revenues of our International subsidiaries and associates provide an indication of the spread and capability of our International network.
Management structure
During the first quarter 2015 we have reorganized our business from three reporting units (formerly known as Global, North America and International) into four reporting units: Willis Capital, Wholesale and Reinsurance, Willis North America, Willis International, and Willis Great Britain "Willis GB".
Willis North America and Willis International remain largely unchanged except for certain specialty teams previously included within Global are now included within the geographic regions in which they are located.
Willis Capital, Wholesale and Reinsurance includes Willis Re, Willis Capital Markets and Advisory and our wholesale businesses as well as a new unit called Willis Portfolio and Underwriting Services.
Willis GB includes our UK retail, facultative and London specialty businesses.
Customers
Our clients operate on a global and local scale in a multitude of businesses and industries throughout the world and generally range in size from major multinational corporations to middle-market companies. Further, many of our client relationships span decades, for instance our relationship with The Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company Limited dates back over 100 years. No one client accounted for more than 10 percent of revenues for fiscal year 2014. Additionally, we place insurance with approximately 2,500 insurance carriers, none of which individually accounted for more than 10 percent of the total premiums we placed on behalf of our clients in 2014.
Competition
We face competition in all fields in which we operate, based on global capability, product breadth, innovation, quality of service and price. We compete with Marsh & McLennan and Aon, the two other major providers of global risk management services, as well as with numerous specialist, regional and local firms. Competition for business is intense in all of our business lines and in every insurance market, and Marsh & McLennan and Aon have substantially greater market share than we do. Competition on premium rates has also exacerbated the pressures caused by a continuing reduction in demand in some classes of business. For example, rather than purchase additional insurance through brokers, some insureds have been retaining a greater proportion of their risk portfolios than previously. Industrial and commercial companies increasingly rely upon their own subsidiary insurance companies, known as captive insurance companies, self-insurance pools, risk retention groups, mutual insurance companies and other mechanisms for funding their risks, rather than buy insurance. Additional competitive pressures arise from the entry of new market participants, such as banks, accounting firms and insurance carriers themselves, offering risk management or transfer services.


11

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Regulation
Our business activities are subject to legal requirements and governmental and quasi-governmental regulatory supervision in all countries in which we operate. Also, such regulations may require individual or company licensing to conduct our business activities. While these requirements may vary from location to location they are generally designed to protect our clients by establishing minimum standards of conduct and practice, particularly regarding the provision of advice and product information as well as financial criteria. Our three most significant regulatory regions are described below:
United States
Our activities in connection with insurance brokerage services within the United States are subject to regulation and supervision by state authorities. Although the scope of regulation and form of supervision may vary from state to state, insurance laws in the United States are often complex and generally grant broad discretion to supervisory authorities in adopting regulations and supervising regulated activities. That supervision generally includes the licensing of insurance brokers and agents and the regulation of the handling and investment of client funds held in a fiduciary capacity. Our continuing ability to provide insurance brokerage in the states in which we currently operate is dependent upon our compliance with the rules and regulations promulgated from time to time by the regulatory authorities in each of these states.
European Union
In 2005, the European Union Insurance Mediation Directive introduced rules to enable insurance and reinsurance intermediaries to operate and provide services within each member state of the European Union on a basis consistent with the EU single market and customer protection aims. Each EU member state in which we operate is required to ensure that the insurance and reinsurance intermediaries resident in their country are registered with a statutory body in that country and that each intermediary meets professional requirements in relation to their competence, good repute, professional indemnity cover and financial capacity.
United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom, our business is regulated by the Financial Conduct Auditory ('FCA'). The FCA has a wide range of rule-making, investigatory and enforcement powers, and conducts monitoring visits to assess our compliance with regulatory requirements.
The FCA has a sole strategic objective: to protect and enhance confidence in the UK financial system. Its operational objectives are to: secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers; promote efficiency and choice in the market for financial services; and protect and enhance the integrity of the UK financial system. The FCA also has a duty to act in a way that promotes competition, and to minimize the extent to which regulated businesses may be used for a purpose connected with financial crime. Finally, the FCA has new powers in product intervention. For instance, it can instruct firms to withdraw or amend misleading financial promotions.
Other
Certain of our activities are governed by other regulatory bodies, such as investment and securities licensing authorities. In the United States, our Willis Capital Markets & Advisory business operates through our wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Securities, Inc., a US-registered broker-dealer and member FINRA/SIPC, primarily in connection with investment banking-related services and advising on alternative risk financing transactions. Willis Capital Markets provides advice on securities or investments in the European Union and Australia through our UK wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Capital Markets & Advisory Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the FCA. Willis Capital Markets, through our Hong Kong wholly-owned subsidiary Willis Capital Markets & Advisory (Hong Kong) Limited, is in the process of obtaining securities and advisory licenses through, and will be regulated by, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.
Our failure, or that of our employees, to satisfy the regulators that we comply with their requirements or the legal requirements governing our activities, can result in disciplinary action, fines, reputational damage and financial harm.
All companies carrying on similar activities in a given jurisdiction are subject to regulations which are not dissimilar to the requirements for our operations in the United States and United Kingdom. We do not consider that these regulatory requirements adversely affect our competitive position.
See Part I, Item 1A-Risk Factors ‘Legal and Regulatory Risks’ for discussion of how actions by regulatory authorities or changes in legislation and regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate may have an adverse effect on our business.

12

Table Of Contents

About Willis

Employees
As of December 31, 2014 we had approximately 18,400 employees worldwide of whom approximately 3,500 were employed in the United Kingdom and 5,900 in the United States, with the balance being employed across the rest of the world. In addition, our associates had approximately 3,700 employees, all of whom were located outside the United Kingdom and the United States.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The executive officers of the Company as of February 20, 2015 were as follows:
Celia Brown - Ms. Brown, age 60, was appointed as an executive officer on January 23, 2012. Ms. Brown joined the Willis Group in 2010 and serves as the Willis Group Human Resources Director. Prior to joining the Willis Group, Ms. Brown spent over 20 years at XL Group plc where she held a number of senior roles. Ms. Brown served from 2006 to 2009 as the Executive Vice President, Head of Global HR and Corporate Relations at XL Group plc. Following XL Group plc, Ms. Brown formed an independent management consultancy, providing human resources services to not-for-profit, corporate and individual clients.
Dominic Casserley - Mr. Casserley, age 57, was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of Willis Group Holdings and as a member of the Board on January 7, 2013. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Casserley, was a senior partner of McKinsey & Company, which he joined in New York in 1983. During his 29 years at McKinsey, Mr. Casserley led the firm's Greater China Practice and its UK and Ireland Practice. Mr. Casserley had been a member of the McKinsey Shareholders Council, the firm's global board, since 1999 and for four years served as the Chairman of the Finance Committee of that board.
John Greene - Mr. Greene, age 49, has served as Chief Financial Officer of Willis Group Holdings since June 2, 2014. Mr. Greene joined Willis Group Holdings after more than eight years with HSBC Holdings, where he served as Chief Financial Officer for their global Retail Bank and Wealth Management business. Previously, Mr. Greene served at HSBC Holdings as Chief Financial Officer for HSBC Insurance and Chief Financial Officer for the Consumer & Mortgage Lending business. Prior to HSBC, he was with GE for twelve years in various roles, including Chief Financial Officer for GE Global Business Finance.
Stephen Hearn - Mr. Hearn, age 48, was appointed as an executive officer on January 1, 2012. Mr. Hearn joined the Willis Group in 2008 and was named Chairman and CEO of Willis Global in 2011, CEO of Willis Limited in 2012 and Group Deputy CEO in 2013. Since joining the Willis Group, Mr. Hearn has served as Chairman of Special Contingency Risk, Chairman of Willis Facultative and Chairman and CEO of Glencairn Limited. From 2009 until 2011 he led Faber & Dumas, Global Markets International and Willis Facultative. Prior to joining the Willis Group, Mr. Hearn served as Chairman and CEO of the Glencairn Group Limited and as President and CEO of Marsh Affinity Europe.
Todd Jones - Mr. Jones, age 50, was appointed as an executive officer and Chief Executive Officer of Willis North America on July 1, 2013. Mr. Jones joined Willis in 2003 as the North American Practice Leader for Willis’s Executive Risks Practice and served as the President of Willis North America from 2010 to 2013. Mr. Jones also served as a National Partner for the Northeast Region. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Jones held various leadership roles in the insurance brokerage industry. Before entering the brokerage industry, he was a financial analyst and corporate banker for a regional bank that is now part of Wells Fargo, focusing on the telecommunications industry.
David Shalders - Mr. Shalders, age 48, was appointed as an executive officer and Group Operations & Technology Director on November 4, 2013. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Shalders spent over a decade in senior operations and IT roles at the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, most recently as Global COO for Global Banking and Markets. Mr. Shalders also held roles as Head of London & Asia Operations and Head of Derivative Operations for NatWest at RBS.
Timothy D. Wright - Mr. Wright, age 53, was appointed as an executive officer in 2008 and in 2011 was appointed as CEO of Willis International. Mr. Wright served as Group Chief Operating Officer from 2008 to 2011. Prior to joining the Willis Group, he was a Partner of Bain & Company where he led their Financial Services practice in London. Mr. Wright was previously UK Managing Partner of Booz Allen & Hamilton and led their insurance work globally. He has more than 20 years of experience in the insurance and financial service industries internationally.



13

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Item1A - Risk Factors
Risks Relating to our Business and the Insurance Industry
This section describes material risks affecting the Group’s business. These risks could materially affect the Group’s business, reputation, revenues, operating income, net income, net assets, liquidity and capital resources and ability to achieve its financial targets and, accordingly should be read in conjunction with any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Competitive Risks
Worldwide economic conditions could have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
Our business and operating results are materially affected by worldwide economic conditions. Current global economic conditions, including those associated with the Eurozone, coupled with low customer and business confidence may have a significant negative impact on the buying behavior of some of our clients as their businesses suffer from these conditions. Since 2008, many of our operations have been impacted by the weakened economic climate. A significant number of insolvencies associated with an economic downturn could adversely affect our brokerage business through the loss of clients or by hampering our ability to place insurance and reinsurance business. In addition, an increase in mergers and acquisitions can also result in the loss of clients. While it is difficult to predict the consequences of any further deterioration in global economic conditions on our business, any significant reduction or delay by our clients in purchasing insurance or making payment of premiums could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the potential for a significant insurer to fail, be downgraded or withdraw from writing certain lines of insurance coverages that we offer our clients could negatively impact overall capacity in the industry, which could then reduce the placement of certain lines and types of insurance and reduce our revenues and profitability. The potential for an insurer to fail or be downgraded could also result in errors and omissions claims by clients.
The credit and economic conditions of certain European Union countries remain fragile and may contribute to instability in the global credit and financial markets. If credit conditions worsen or financial market volatility increases in the Eurozone, it is possible that it could have a negative effect on the global economy as a whole, and our business, operating results and financial condition. If the Eurozone continues to deteriorate, there will likely be a negative effect on our European business, as well as the businesses of our European clients. Further, were the Euro to be withdrawn entirely, or the Eurozone were to be dissolved as a common currency area, the legal and contractual consequences for holders of Euro-denominated obligations would be determined by laws in effect at such time. A significant devaluation of the Euro would cause the value of our financial assets that are denominated in Euros to be significantly reduced. Any of these conditions could ultimately harm our overall business, prospects, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
We may not be able to fully realize the anticipated benefits of our growth strategy.
We have stated certain goals at our 2013 Investor Conference and our outlook for 2015. In order to achieve these goals, we are implementing certain revenue growth strategies and continue to strive to manage our cost base. For example, we announced a series of actions that include, among other things, our multi-year operational improvement program and initiatives to better connect Willis. In light of the potential operational risks associated with these new initiatives, we cannot be certain whether we will be able to realize benefits from current revenue-generating or cost-saving initiatives and ultimately realize our objectives. There can be no assurance that our actual results will meet these financial goals.
We do not control the premiums on which our commissions are based, and volatility or declines in premiums may seriously undermine our profitability.
We derive most of our revenues from commissions and fees for brokerage and consulting services and do not determine the insurance premiums on which our commissions are generally based. Commission levels generally follow the same trend as premium levels, as they are a percentage of the premiums paid by the insureds. Fluctuations in the premiums charged by the insurance carriers can therefore have a direct and potentially material impact on our results of operations. Due to the cyclical nature of the insurance market and the impact of other market conditions on insurance premiums, commission levels may vary widely between accounting periods. A period of low or declining premium rates, generally known as a 'soft' or 'softening' market, generally leads to downward pressure on commission revenues and can have a material adverse impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. A 'hard' or 'firming' market, during which premium rates rise, generally has a

14

Table of Contents

Risk factors

favorable impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. Rates, however, vary by geography, industry and client segment. We have been and continue to be negatively impacted by soft market conditions across certain sectors and geographic regions. In addition, insurance carriers may seek to reduce their expenses by reducing the commission rates payable to insurance agents or brokers such as ourselves. The reduction of these commission rates, along with general volatility and/or declines in premiums, may significantly undermine our profitability.
Competition in our industry is intense, and if we are unable to compete effectively, we may suffer lower revenue, reduced operating margins and lose market share which could materially and adversely affect our business.
We face competition in all fields in which we operate, based on global capability, product breadth, innovation, quality of service and price. We compete with Marsh & McLennan and Aon, the two major global providers of global risk management services, as well as with numerous specialist, regional and local firms. Competition for business is intense in all of our business lines and in every insurance market, and Marsh & McLennan and Aon have substantially greater market share than we do. Competition on premium rates has also exacerbated the pressures caused by a continuing reduction in demand in some classes of business. For example, rather than purchase additional insurance through brokers, some insureds have been retaining a greater proportion of their risk portfolios than previously. Industrial and commercial companies increasingly rely upon their own subsidiary insurance companies, known as captive insurance companies, self-insurance pools, risk retention groups, mutual insurance companies and other mechanisms for funding their risks, rather than buy insurance. Additional competitive pressures arise from the entry of non-traditional market participants, such as banks, accounting firms and insurance carriers themselves, offering risk management or transfer services. If we are unable to compete effectively, we may suffer lower revenue, reduced operating margins and lose market share which could materially and adversely affect our business.
The loss of our Chief Executive Officer or a number of our senior management or a significant number of our brokers could significantly impede our financial plans, growth, marketing and other objectives.
The loss of our Chief Executive Officer, a number of our senior management or a significant number of our brokers could significantly impede our financial plans, growth, marketing and other objectives. Our success depends to a substantial extent not only on the ability and experience of our Chief Executive Officer, Dominic Casserley, and other members of our senior management, but also on the individual brokers and teams that service our clients and maintain client relationships. The insurance and reinsurance brokerage industry has in the past experienced intense competition for the services of leading individual brokers and brokerage teams, and we have lost key individuals and teams to competitors. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our ability to attract and retain additional highly skilled and qualified personnel and to expand, train and manage our employee base. We may not continue to be successful in doing so because the competition for qualified personnel in our industry is intense.
We face certain risks associated with the acquisition or disposition of businesses and lack of control over investments in associates.
In pursuing our corporate strategy, we may acquire or dispose of or exit businesses or reorganize existing investments. For example, we have a call option to acquire 100 percent of the capital of our associate, Gras Savoye. The success of our overall acquisition and disposition strategy is dependent upon our ability to identify appropriate opportunities, negotiate transactions on favorable terms and ultimately complete such transactions. Once we complete acquisitions or reorganizations there can be no assurance that we will realize the anticipated benefits of any transaction, including revenue growth, operational efficiencies or expected synergies. For example, if we fail to recognize some or all of the strategic benefits and synergies expected from a transaction, goodwill and intangible assets may be impaired in future periods.
In addition, we may not be able to integrate acquisitions successfully into our existing business, and we could incur or assume unknown or unanticipated liabilities or contingencies, which may impact our results of operations. If we dispose of or otherwise exit certain businesses, there can be no assurance that we will not incur certain disposition related charges, or that we will be able to reduce the overheads related to the divested assets.
We also own an interest in a number of associates where we do not exercise management control and we are therefore limited in our ability to direct or manage the business to realize the anticipated benefits that we can achieve if we had full ownership.
Investment in innovative product offerings may fail to yield sufficient return to cover their investment.
From time to time, we may enter new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There can be substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, including the investment of significant time and resources, the possibility that these efforts will be unprofitable, and the risk of additional liabilities associated with these efforts. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business and new products

15

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


and services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results for operations. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business. In addition, we can provide no assurance that the entry into new lines of business or development of new products and services will be successful.
We are continually developing and investing in new and innovative offerings that we believe will address needs that we identify in the market. Nevertheless, the ability of these efforts to produce meaningful value is dependent on a number of other factors, some of which are outside of our control. For example, we have invested substantial time and resources in launching The Willis Advantage under the belief that this exchange will serve a useful role to help corporations and individuals in the United States manage their growing health care expenses. But in order for The Willis Advantage to be successful, health care insurers and corporate and individual participants must deem it suitable to participate in, and such decisions are based on their own particular circumstances.
Our business performance and growth plans could be negatively affected if we are not able to effectively apply technology to drive value for our clients through technology-based solutions or gain internal efficiencies through the effective application of technology and related tools.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to develop and implement technology solutions that anticipate and keep pace with rapid and continuing changes in technology, industry standards and client preferences. We may not be successful in anticipating or responding to these developments in a timely and cost-effective manner, and our ideas may not be accepted in the marketplace. Additionally, the effort to gain technological expertise and develop new technologies in our business requires us to incur significant cost. Our competitors are seeking to develop competing technologies, and their success in this space may impact our ability to differentiate our services to our clients through the use of unique technological solutions. If we cannot offer new technologies as quickly as our competitors or if our competitors develop more cost-effective technologies, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to obtain and complete client engagements.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
Our compliance systems and controls cannot guarantee that we comply with all applicable federal and state or foreign laws and regulations, and actions by regulatory authorities or changes in applicable laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate may have an adverse effect on our business.
Our activities are subject to extensive regulation under the laws of the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and its member states, and the other jurisdictions around the world in which we operate. In addition, we own an interest in a number of associates where we do not exercise management control. Over the last few years, regulators across the world are increasingly seeking to regulate brokers who operate in their jurisdictions. Compliance with laws and regulations that apply to our operations is complex and increases our cost of doing business. These laws and regulations include insurance and financial industry regulations, economic and trade sanctions and laws against financial crimes, including client money and anti-money laundering, bribery or other corruption, such as the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, anti-competition and data privacy legislation. In most jurisdictions, governmental and regulatory authorities have the ability to interpret and amend these laws and regulations and impose penalties for non-compliance, including sanctions, civil remedies, monetary fines, injunctions, revocation of licenses or approvals, suspension of individuals, limitations on business activities or redress to clients. While we believe that we have substantially increased our focus on the geographic breadth of regulations to which we are subject, maintain good relationships with our key regulators and our current systems and controls are adequate, we cannot assure that such systems and controls will prevent any violations of any applicable laws and regulations.
Our business, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity may be materially adversely affected by actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and proceedings.
We are subject to various actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and other proceedings relating principally to alleged errors and omissions in connection with the placement of insurance and reinsurance in the ordinary course of business. Because we often assist our clients with matters, including the placement of insurance coverage and the handling of related claims, involving substantial amounts of money, errors and omissions claims against us may arise which allege our potential liability for all or part of the amounts in question.
Claimants can seek large damage awards and these claims can involve potentially significant defense costs. Such claims, lawsuits and other proceedings could, for example, include allegations of damages for our employees or sub-agents improperly failing to place coverage or notify claims on behalf of clients, to provide insurance carriers with complete and accurate information relating to the risks being insured or to appropriately apply funds that we hold for our clients on a fiduciary basis.

16

Table of Contents

Risk factors

Errors and omissions claims, lawsuits and other proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business are covered in part by professional indemnity or other appropriate insurance. The terms of this insurance vary by policy year and self-insured risks have increased significantly in recent years. In respect of self-insured risks, we have established provisions against these items which we believe to be adequate in the light of current information and legal advice, and we adjust such provisions from time to time according to developments. Our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity may be adversely affected if in the future our insurance coverage proves to be inadequate or unavailable or there is an increase in liabilities for which we self-insure. Our ability to obtain professional indemnity insurance in the amounts and with the deductibles we desire in the future may be adversely impacted by general developments in the market for such insurance or our own claims experience.
We are also subject to actual and potential claims, lawsuits, investigations and proceedings outside of errors and omissions claims. An example of material claims for which we are subject that are outside of the error and omissions claims context relate to those arising out of the collapse of The Stanford Financial Group, for which we acted as brokers of record on certain lines of insurance.
The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be ascertained and liabilities in indeterminate amounts may be imposed on us. It is thus possible that future results of operations or cash flows for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by an unfavorable resolution of these matters. In addition, these matters continue to divert management and personnel resources away from operating our business. Even if we do not experience significant monetary costs, there may also be adverse publicity associated with these matters that could result in reputational harm to the insurance brokerage industry in general or to us in particular that may adversely affect our business, client or employee relationships.
Accepting market derived income (MDI) may cause regulatory or other scrutiny, which may have a material and adverse effect on our business.
Insurance intermediaries have traditionally been remunerated by commission or fees paid by clients. Intermediaries also obtain revenue from insurance carriers. This is commonly known as market derived income or 'MDI'. MDI takes a variety of forms, including volume- or profit-based contingent commissions, facilities administration charges, business development agreements, and fees for providing certain data to carriers.
MDI creates various risks. Intermediaries have a duty to act in the best interests of their clients and payments from carriers can incentivize intermediaries to put carriers’ interests ahead of their clients. Accordingly, MDI may be subject to scrutiny by various regulators under conflict of interest, anti-trust, unfair competition, and anti-bribery laws and regulations. While accepting MDI is a lawful and acceptable business practice, and while we have established systems and controls to manage these risks, we cannot predict whether our position will result in regulatory or other scrutiny.
IT and Operational Risks
Data security breaches or improper disclosure of confidential company or personal data could result in material financial loss, loss of human capital, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
Computer viruses, hackers and other external hazards, as well as improper or inadvertent staff behavior could expose confidential company and personal data systems to security breaches. Additionally, one of our significant responsibilities is to maintain the security and privacy of our clients’ confidential and proprietary information and the personal data of their employees. These increased risks, and expanding regulatory requirements regarding data security, could expose us to data loss, monetary and reputational damages and significant increases in compliance costs.
With respect to our commercial arrangements with third-party vendors, we have processes designed to require third-party IT outsourcing, offsite storage and other vendors to agree to maintain certain standards with respect to the storage, protection and transfer of confidential, personal and proprietary information. However, we remain at risk of a data breach due to the intentional or unintentional non-compliance by a vendor’s employee or agent, the breakdown of a vendor’s data protection processes, or a cyber-attack on a vendor’s information systems.
We have experienced a number of data incidents, resulting from human error as well as attempts at unauthorized access to our systems, which to date have not had a material impact on our business, operations or clients.
We maintain policies, procedures and technological safeguards designed to protect the security and privacy of this information. However, we cannot entirely eliminate the risk of data security breaches, improper access to or disclosure of confidential company or personally identifiable information. Our technology may fail to adequately secure the private information we hold and protect it from theft, computer viruses, hackers or inadvertent loss. In such circumstances, we may be held liable to our clients, which could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue.

17

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Further, data privacy, information security, identity theft, and related computer and internet issues are matters of growing public concern and are subject to frequently changing rules and regulations. Our failure to adhere to or successfully implement processes in response to changing regulatory requirements and customer expectations in this area could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation.
Interruption to or loss of our information processing capabilities or failure to effectively maintain and upgrade our information processing hardware or systems could cause material financial loss, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
Our business depends significantly on effective information systems. Our capacity to service our clients relies on effective storage, retrieval, processing and management of information. Our information systems also rely on the commitment of significant resources to maintain and enhance existing systems, develop and create new systems and products in order to keep pace with continuing changes in information processing technology or evolving industry and regulatory standards and to be at the forefront of a range of technology relevant to our business.
If the data we rely on to run our business were found to be inaccurate or unreliable or if we fail to maintain effective and efficient systems (including through a telecommunications failure, failure to replace or update redundant or obsolete computer hardware, applications or software systems or if we experience other disruptions), this could result in material financial loss, regulatory action, reputational harm or legal liability.
Our inability to successfully recover should we experience a natural disaster or other significant disruption to business continuity could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Our ability to conduct business may be adversely affected, even in the short-term, by a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our business and the communities where we are located. This may include a disruption caused by restricted physical site access, terrorist activities, disease pandemics, or outages to electrical, communications or other services used by our company, our employees or third parties with whom we conduct business. Although we have business continuity and disaster recovery procedures in place and insurance to protect against such contingencies, such procedures may not be entirely effective and any insurance or recovery procedures may not continue to be available at reasonable prices and may not address all such losses or compensate us for the possible loss of clients occurring during any period that we are unable to provide services. Our inability to successfully recover should we experience a natural disaster or other significant disruption to business continuity could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Certain of our businesses pose underwriting, advisory or reputational risks and can have a significant adverse impact on our financial results.
We provide a broad range of brokerage, reinsurance and risk management consulting services to our clients worldwide. In addition, our Willis Capital Markets & Advisory business provides advice to insurance and reinsurance companies on a broad array of merger and acquisition transactions as well as capital markets products, including acting as underwriter or agent for primary issuances, operating a secondary insurance-linked securities trading desk and engaging in general capital markets and strategic advisory work. These operations may pose certain underwriting, advisory or reputational risks to our business.
Financial Risks
Our outstanding debt could adversely affect our cash flows and financial flexibility.
We had total consolidated debt outstanding of approximately $2.3 billion as of December 31, 2014 and our 2014 interest expense was $135 million. Although management believes that our cash flows will be sufficient to service this debt, there may be circumstances in which required payments of principal and/or interest on this debt could adversely affect our cash flows and this level of indebtedness may:
require us to dedicate a significant portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, thereby reducing the availability of cash flow to fund capital expenditures, to pursue other acquisitions or investments, to pay dividends and for general corporate purposes;
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic conditions, including if we borrow at variable interest rates, which makes us vulnerable to increases in interest rates generally;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes or challenges relating to our business and industry; and
put us at a competitive disadvantage against competitors who have less indebtedness or are in a more favorable

18

Table of Contents

Risk factors

position to access additional capital resources.
The terms of our current financings also include certain limitations. For example, the agreements relating to the debt arrangements and credit facilities contain numerous operating and financial covenants, including requirements to maintain minimum ratios of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated cash interest expense and maximum levels of consolidated funded indebtedness in relation to consolidated EBITDA, in each case subject to certain adjustments.
A failure to comply with the restrictions under our credit facilities and outstanding notes could result in a default under the financing obligations or could require us to obtain waivers from our lenders for failure to comply with these restrictions. The occurrence of a default that remains uncured or the inability to secure a necessary consent or waiver could cause our obligations with respect to our debt to be accelerated and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our pension liabilities may increase which could require us to make additional cash contributions to our pension plans reducing the cash available for other uses.
We have two principal defined benefit plans: one in the United Kingdom and the other in the United States, and in addition, we have several smaller defined benefit pension plans in certain other countries in which we operate.
In 2012, we agreed a revised funding strategy with the UK plan's trustee under which we are committed to make additional cash contributions in the event that our adjusted EBITDA exceeds certain thresholds, or we make exceptional returns for our shareholders, including share buybacks or special dividends. As a result, we may be committed to make additional contributions through to 2017 based on the prior year's performance. During 2015, we will be required to negotiate a new funding arrangement which may change the contributions we are required to make during 2015 and beyond.
Total cash contributions, excluding employees’ salary sacrifice contributions, to these defined benefit pension plans in 2014 were $112 million. In 2015, the Company currently expects to make cash contributions of approximately $116 million, including exceptional returns, to these pension plans, although we may elect to contribute more. Future estimates are based on certain assumptions, including discount rates, interest rates, mortality, fair value of assets and expected return on plan assets.
We have taken actions to manage our pension liabilities, including closing our UK and US plans to new participants and restricting final pensionable salaries. Future benefit accruals in the US pension plan were also stopped, or frozen, on May 15, 2009. Nevertheless, the determination of pension expense and pension funding is based on a variety of rules and regulations. Changes in these rules and regulations could impact the calculation of pension plan liabilities and the valuation of pension plan assets. They may also result in higher pension costs, additional financial statement disclosure, and accelerate and increase the need to fully fund our pension plans through increased cash contributions. Further, a significant decline in the value of investments that fund our pension plan, if not offset or mitigated by a decline in our liabilities, may significantly alter the values and actuarial assumptions used to calculate our future pension expense and we could be required to fund our plan with significant additional amounts of cash. In addition to the critical assumptions described above, our plans use certain assumptions about the life expectancy of plan participants and surviving spouses. Periodic revision of those assumptions can materially change the present value of future benefits and therefore the funded status of the plans and the resulting periodic pension expense. Changes in our pension benefit obligations, the related net periodic costs or credits, and the required level of future cash contributions, may occur in the future due to any variance of actual results from our assumptions and changes in the number of participating employees. The need to make additional cash contributions may reduce our financial flexibility and increase liquidity risk by reducing the cash available to meet our other obligations, including the payment obligations under our credit facilities and other long-term debt, or other needs of our business.
We could incur substantial losses, including with respect to our own cash and fiduciary cash held on behalf of insurance companies and clients, if one of the financial institutions we use in our operations failed.
We maintain significant cash balances at various US depository institutions that are significantly in excess of the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. We also maintain significant cash balances in foreign financial institutions. A significant portion of this cash is fiduciary cash held on behalf of insurance companies or clients. If one or more of the institutions in which we maintain significant cash balances were to fail, our ability to access these funds might be temporarily or permanently limited, and we could face a material liquidity problem and potentially material financial losses. We would also be liable to claims made by the insurance companies or our clients regarding the fiduciary cash held on their behalf.



19

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


A downgrade to our corporate credit rating and the credit ratings of our outstanding debt may adversely affect our borrowing costs and financial flexibility and, under certain circumstances, may require us to offer to buy back some of our outstanding debt.
A downgrade in our corporate credit rating or the credit ratings of our debt would increase our borrowing costs including those under our credit facilities, and reduce our financial flexibility. In addition, certain downgrades would trigger a step-up in interest rates under the indentures for our 6.200% senior notes due 2017 and our 7.000% senior notes due 2019, which would increase our interest expense. If we need to raise capital in the future, any credit rating downgrade could negatively affect our financing costs or access to financing sources. This may in turn impact the assumptions when performing our goodwill impairment testing which may reduce the excess of fair value over carrying value of the reporting units.
In addition, under the indenture for our 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and our 6.125% senior notes due 2043, if we experience a ratings decline together with a change of control event, we would be required to offer to purchase our 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and our 6.125% senior notes due 2043 from holders unless we had previously redeemed those notes. We may not have sufficient funds available or access to funding to repurchase tendered notes in that event, which could result in a default under the notes. Any future debt that we incur may contain covenants regarding repurchases in the event of a change of control triggering event.
We are a holding company and, therefore, may not be able to receive dividends or other distributions in needed amounts from our subsidiaries.
Willis Group Holdings is a holding company that conducts no business of its own. We are dependent upon dividends and other payments from our operating subsidiaries to meet our obligations for paying principal and interest on outstanding debt obligations, for paying dividends to shareholders and for corporate expenses. Legal and regulatory restrictions, foreign exchange controls, as well as operating requirements of our subsidiaries, may limit our ability to obtain cash from these subsidiaries. For example, Willis Limited, our UK brokerage subsidiary regulated by the FCA, is currently required to maintain $126 million in unencumbered and available funds, of which at least $79 million must be in cash, for regulatory purposes. In the event our operating subsidiaries are unable to pay dividends and make other payments to Willis Group Holdings, we may not be able to service debt, pay obligations or pay dividends on ordinary shares.
If our goodwill becomes impaired, we may be required to record significant charges to earnings, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings.
We have a substantial amount of goodwill on our balance sheet as a result of acquisitions we have completed. We review goodwill for impairment annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. Application of the impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assignment of assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting units and determination of fair value of each reporting unit. Notwithstanding the fact that we recognized an impairment charge in fiscal year 2012 for our North American reporting unit, the risk remains that a significant deterioration in a key estimate or assumption or a less significant deterioration to a combination of assumptions or the sale of a part of a reporting unit could result in an impairment charge in the future, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings.
For further information on our testing for goodwill impairment, see ‘Critical Accounting Estimates’ under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
International Risks
Our significant non-US operations, particularly our London market operations, expose us to exchange rate fluctuations and various risks that could impact our business.
A significant portion of our operations is conducted outside the United States. Accordingly, we are subject to legal, economic and market risks associated with operating in foreign countries, including devaluations and fluctuations in currency exchange rates; imposition of limitations on conversion of foreign currencies into pounds sterling or dollars or remittance of dividends and other payments by foreign subsidiaries; hyperinflation in certain foreign countries; imposition or increase of investment and other restrictions by foreign governments; and the requirement of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws.
We report our operating results and financial condition in US dollars. Our US operations earn revenue and incur expenses primarily in US dollars. In our London market operations, however, we earn revenue in a number of different currencies, but expenses are almost entirely incurred in pounds sterling. Outside the United States and our London market operations, we

20

Table of Contents

Risk factors

predominantly generate revenue and expenses in the local currency. The table gives an approximate analysis of revenues and expenses by currency in 2014.
 
US
Dollars
 
Pounds
Sterling
 Euros 
Other
currencies
Revenues58% 8% 13% 21%
Expenses46% 25% 9% 20%

Because of devaluations and fluctuations in currency exchange rates or the imposition of limitations on conversion of foreign currencies into US dollars, we are subject to currency translation exposure on the profits of our operations, in addition to economic exposure. Furthermore, the mismatch between pounds sterling revenues and expenses, together with any net sterling balance sheet position we hold in our US dollar denominated London market operations, creates an exchange exposure.
For example, as the pound sterling strengthens, the US dollars required to be translated into pounds sterling to cover the net sterling expenses increase, which then causes our results to be negatively impacted. However, any net sterling asset we are holding will be more valuable when translated into US dollars. Given these facts, the strength of the pound sterling relative to the US dollar has in the past had a material negative impact on our reported results. This risk could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flow and results of operations in the future.
Additionally, as at December 31, 2014, we are using the SICAD I rate of approximately 12 Venezuelan Bolivars per US Dollar to report our Venezuelan financial position, following devaluation from the official rate of approximately six Bolivars per US dollar. We cannot predict whether there will be a further devaluation of the Venezuelan currency or whether the use of the SICAD I rate will continue to be supported. As at December 31, 2014 we have approximately $22 million of net monetary assets that are denominated in the Venezuela Bolivar.
Where needed, we deploy a hedging strategy to mitigate part of our operating exposure to exchange rate movements, but such mitigating attempts may not be successful. For more information on this strategy, see Part II Item 8 - 'Note 24 Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities'.
In conducting our businesses around the world, we are subject to political, economic, legal, market, nationalization, operational and other risks that are inherent in operating in many countries.
In conducting our businesses and maintaining and supporting our global operations, we are subject to political, economic, legal, market, nationalization, operational and other risks. Our businesses and operations continue to expand into new regions throughout the world, including emerging markets. The possible effects of economic and financial disruptions throughout the world could have an adverse impact on our businesses. These risks include:
the general economic and political conditions in foreign countries,
the imposition of controls or limitations on the conversion of foreign currencies or remittance of dividends and other payments by foreign subsidiaries;
the imposition of sanctions by both the United States and foreign governments;
imposition of withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments from subsidiaries;
imposition or increase of investment and other restrictions by foreign governments;
the price of commodities, such as oil;
fluctuations in our tax rate;
difficulties in controlling operations and monitoring employees in geographically dispersed and culturally diverse locations;
the practical challenge and costs of complying, or monitoring compliance, with a wide variety of foreign laws (some of which may conflict with US or other sources of law), laws and regulations applicable to insurance brokers and US business operations abroad, including rules relating to the conduct of business, trade sanctions administered by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control, the EU, the UK and the UN, and the requirements of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as well as other anti-bribery and corruption rules and requirements in the countries in which we operate; and

21

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


the practical challenge and costs of complying with local regulation for our operating subsidiaries across the globe.
Legislative and regulatory action could materially and adversely affect us and our effective tax rate may increase.
There is uncertainty regarding the tax policies of the jurisdictions where we operate (which include the potential legislative actions described below), and our tax rate may increase and any such increase may be material. Additionally, the tax laws of Ireland and other jurisdictions could change in the future, and such changes could cause a material change in our effective tax rate. For example, legislative action may be taken by the US Congress which, if ultimately enacted, could override tax treaties upon which we rely or could broaden the circumstances under which we would be considered a US resident, each of which could materially and adversely affect our effective tax rate and cash tax position. We cannot predict the outcome of any specific legislative proposals. However, if proposals were enacted that had the effect of limiting our ability to take advantage of tax treaties between Ireland and other jurisdictions (including the United States), we could be subjected to increased taxation. In addition, any future amendments to the current income tax treaties between Ireland and other jurisdictions could subject us to increased taxation.
Irish law differs from the laws in effect in the United States and may afford less protection to holders of our securities.
It may not be possible to enforce court judgments obtained in the United States against us in Ireland based on the civil liability provisions of the US federal or state securities laws. In addition, there is some uncertainty as to whether the courts of Ireland would recognize or enforce judgments of US courts obtained against us or our directors or officers based on the civil liabilities provisions of the US federal or state securities laws or hear actions against us or those persons based on those laws. We have been advised that the United States currently does not have a treaty with Ireland providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. Therefore, a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any US federal or state court based on civil liability, whether or not based solely on US federal or state securities laws, would not be directly enforceable in Ireland. While not directly enforceable, it is possible for a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any US federal or state court based on civil liability to be enforced in Ireland through common law rules. However, this process is subject to numerous established principles and would involve the commencement of a new set of proceedings in Ireland to enforce the judgment.
As an Irish company, Willis Group Holdings is currently governed by the Irish Companies Acts 1963-2013. In late 2014, a new Companies Act (the “2014 Act”) was passed by both houses of the Irish parliament and is expected to apply to all companies including Willis Group Holdings from June 1, 2015. In addition to introducing new provisions, the 2014 Act carries over many of the existing rules applicable to Irish companies which differ in some material respects from laws generally applicable to US corporations and shareholders, including, among others, differences relating to interested director and officer transactions and shareholder lawsuits. Likewise, under the current regime and the 2014 Act, the duties of directors and officers of an Irish company generally are owed to the company only. Shareholders of Irish companies generally do not have a personal right of action against directors or officers of the company and may exercise such rights of action on behalf of the Company only in limited circumstances. Accordingly, holders of Willis Group Holdings securities may have more difficulty protecting their interests than would holders of securities of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction of the United States.


Item 1B — Unresolved Staff Comments
The Company had no unresolved comments from the SEC’s staff.

22


Properties

Item 2 — Properties
We own and lease a number of properties for use as offices throughout the world and believe that our properties are generally suitable and adequate for the purposes for which they are used. The principal properties are located in the United Kingdom and the United States. Willis maintains over 3.9 million square feet of space worldwide.

London
In London we occupy a prime site comprising 491,000 square feet spread over a 28-story tower and adjoining 10-story building. We have a 25-year lease on this property which expires June 2032. We sub-let approximately 17,500 square feet of the 28-story tower to a third party. We also sub-let the 10-story adjoining building.

North America
In North America, outside of New York, Chicago and Nashville, we lease approximately 1.3 million square feet around 100 locations.

New York
In New York, we occupy 205,000 square feet of office space at Brookfield Place under a 20-year lease, expiring September 2026.

Chicago
In Chicago, we occupy 140,000 square feet at the Willis Tower under a lease expiring February 2025. We sub-let approximately 17,000 square feet to a third party.

Nashville
In Nashville, we occupy 170,000 square feet under a lease expiring April 2026.

Rest of World
Outside of North America and London we lease approximately 1.4 million square feet of office space in over 200 locations. Two of our properties in Ipswich, United Kingdom have liens on the land and buildings in connection with a revolving credit facility.
Item 3 — Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to various actual and potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings relating principally to alleged errors and omissions in connection with the placement of insurance and reinsurance. Similar to other corporations, the Company is also subject to a variety of other claims, including those relating to the Company’s employment practices. Some of the claims, lawsuits and other proceedings seek damages in amounts which could, if assessed, be significant.
Errors and omissions claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business are covered in part by professional indemnity or other appropriate insurance. The terms of this insurance vary by policy year and self-insured risks have increased significantly in recent years. Regarding self-insured risks, the Company has established provisions which are believed to be adequate in the light of current information and legal advice, and the Company adjusts such provisions from time to time according to developments.
On the basis of current information, the Company does not expect that the actual claims, lawsuits and other proceedings to which the Company is subject, or potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings relating to matters of which it is aware, will ultimately have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Nonetheless, given the large or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these actions, and the inherent unpredictability of litigation and

23

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


disputes with insurance companies, it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.
The material actual or potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings, of which the Company is currently aware, are as follows:
Stanford Financial Group Litigation
The Company has been named as a defendant in 13 similar lawsuits relating to the collapse of The Stanford Financial Group (‘Stanford’), for which Willis of Colorado, Inc. acted as broker of record on certain lines of insurance. The complaints in these actions generally allege that the defendants actively and materially aided Stanford’s alleged fraud by providing Stanford with certain letters regarding coverage that they knew would be used to help retain or attract actual or prospective Stanford client investors. The complaints further allege that these letters, which contain statements about Stanford and the insurance policies that the defendants placed for Stanford, contained untruths and omitted material facts and were drafted in this manner to help Stanford promote and sell its allegedly fraudulent certificates of deposit.
The 13 actions are as follows:
Troice, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:9-CV-1274-N, was filed on July 2, 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and a Willis associate, among others. On April 1, 2011, plaintiffs filed the operative Third Amended Class Action Complaint individually and on behalf of a putative, worldwide class of Stanford investors, adding Willis Limited as a defendant and alleging claims under Texas statutory and common law and seeking damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages and costs. On May 2, 2011, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the Third Amended Class Action Complaint, arguing, inter alia, that the plaintiffs’ claims are precluded by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (‘SLUSA’).
On May 10, 2011, the court presiding over the Stanford-related actions in the Northern District of Texas entered an order providing that it would consider the applicability of SLUSA to the Stanford-related actions based on the decision in a separate Stanford action not involving a Willis entity, Roland v. Green, Civil Action No. 3:10-CV-0224-N. On August 31, 2011, the court issued its decision in Roland, dismissing that action with prejudice under SLUSA.
On October 27, 2011, the court in Troice entered an order (i) dismissing with prejudice those claims asserted in the Third Amended Class Action Complaint on a class basis on the grounds set forth in the Roland decision discussed above and (ii) dismissing without prejudice those claims asserted in the Third Amended Class Action Complaint on an individual basis. Also on October 27, 2011, the court entered a final judgment in the action.
On October 28, 2011, the plaintiffs in Troice filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Subsequently, Troice, Roland and a third action captioned Troice, et al. v. Proskauer Rose LLP, Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-01600-N, which also was dismissed on the grounds set forth in the Roland decision discussed above and on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, were consolidated for purposes of briefing and oral argument. Following the completion of briefing and oral argument, on March 19, 2012, the Fifth Circuit reversed and remanded the actions. On April 2, 2012, the defendants-appellees filed petitions for rehearing en banc. On April 19, 2012, the petitions for rehearing en banc were denied. On July 18, 2012, defendants-appellees filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court regarding the Fifth Circuit's reversal in Troice. On January 18, 2013, the Supreme Court granted our petition. Opening briefs were filed on May 3, 2013 and the Supreme Court heard oral argument on October 7, 2013. On February 26, 2014, the Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit’s decision.
On March 19, 2014, the plaintiffs in Troice filed a Motion to Defer Resolution of Motions to Dismiss, to Compel Rule 26(f) Conference and For Entry of Scheduling Order. That motion has now been fully briefed by the parties and awaits disposition by the court.
On March 25, 2014, the parties in Troice and the Janvey, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al. action discussed below stipulated to the consolidation of the two actions for pre-trial purposes under Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On March 28, 2014, the Court “so ordered” that stipulation and, thus, consolidated Troice and Janvey for pre-trial purposes under Rule 42(a).
On September 16, 2014, the court (a) denied the plaintiffs’ request to defer resolution of the defendants’ motions to dismiss, but granted the plaintiffs’ request to enter a scheduling order; (b) requested the submission of supplemental briefing by all parties on the defendants’ motions to dismiss, which the parties submitted on September 30, 2014; and (c) entered an order

24

Table Of Contents

Legal proceedings


setting a schedule for briefing and discovery regarding plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, which schedule, among other things, provides for the submission of the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification (following the completion of briefing and discovery) on April 20, 2015.
On December 15, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motions to dismiss. On January 30, 2015, the defendants answered the Third Amended Class Action Complaint.
Ranni v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 9-22085, was filed on July 17, 2009 against Willis Group Holdings plc and Willis of Colorado, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The complaint was filed on behalf of a putative class of Venezuelan and other South American Stanford investors and alleges claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and Rule 10b-5 thereunder) and Florida statutory and common law and seeks damages in an amount to be determined at trial. On October 6, 2009, Ranni was transferred, for consolidation or coordination with other Stanford-related actions (including Troice), to the Northern District of Texas by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the ‘JPML’). The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Ranni. On August 26, 2014, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice.

Canabal, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:9-CV-1474-D, was filed on August 6, 2009 against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate named as a defendant in Troice, among others, also in the Northern District of Texas. The complaint was filed individually and on behalf of a putative class of Venezuelan Stanford investors, alleged claims under Texas statutory and common law and sought damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. On December 18, 2009, the parties in Troice and Canabal stipulated to the consolidation of those actions (under the Troice civil action number), and, on December 31, 2009, the plaintiffs in Canabal filed a notice of dismissal, dismissing the action without prejudice.
Rupert, et al. v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2009C115137, was filed on September 14, 2009 on behalf of 97 Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Bexar County). The complaint alleges claims under the Securities Act of 1933, Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks special, consequential and treble damages of more than $300 million, attorneys’ fees and costs. On October 20, 2009, certain defendants, including Willis of Colorado, Inc., (i) removed Rupert to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this related action and (iii) moved to stay the action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On April 1, 2010, the JPML issued a final transfer order for the transfer of Rupert to the Northern District of Texas. On January 24, 2012, the court remanded Rupert to Texas state court (Bexar County), but stayed the action until further order of the court. On August 13, 2012, the plaintiffs filed a motion to lift the stay, which motion was denied by the court on September 16, 2014. On October 10, 2014, the plaintiffs appealed the court’s denial of their motion to lift the stay to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On January 5, 2015, the Fifth Circuit consolidated the appeal with the appeal in the Rishmague, et ano. v. Winter, et al. action discussed below, and the consolidated appeal is currently pending. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Rupert.
Casanova, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:10-CV-1862-O, was filed on September 16, 2010 on behalf of seven Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis Limited, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, also in the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleges claims under Texas statutory and common law and seeks actual damages in excess of $5 million, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Casanova.
Rishmague, et ano. v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2011CI2585, was filed on March 11, 2011 on behalf of two Stanford investors, individually and as representatives of certain trusts, against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc., Willis of Texas, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Bexar County). The complaint alleges claims under Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks special, consequential and treble damages of more than $37 million and attorneys’ fees and costs. On April 11, 2011, certain defendants, including Willis of Colorado, Inc., (i) removed Rishmague to the Western District of Texas, (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this related action and (iii) moved to stay the action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On August 8, 2011, the JPML issued a final transfer order for the transfer of Rishmague to the Northern District of Texas, where it is currently pending. On August 13, 2012, the plaintiffs joined with the plaintiffs in the Rupert action in their motion to lift the court’s stay of the Rupert action. On September 9, 2014, the court remanded Rishmague to Texas state court (Bexar County), but stayed the action until further order of the court and denied the plaintiffs’ motion to lift the stay. On October 10, 2014, the plaintiffs appealed the court’s denial of their motion to lift the stay to the Fifth Circuit. On January 5, 2015,

25

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


the Fifth Circuit consolidated the appeal with the appeal in the Rupert action, and the consolidated appeal is currently pending. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Rishmague.
MacArthur v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2013-07840, was filed on February 8, 2013 on behalf of two Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc., Willis of Texas, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Harris County). The complaint alleges claims under Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks actual, special, consequential and treble damages of approximately $4 million and attorneys' fees and costs. On March 29, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and Willis of Texas, Inc. (i) removed MacArthur to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas and (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this related action. On April 2, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and Willis of Texas, Inc. filed a motion in the Southern District of Texas to stay the action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. Also on April 2, 2013, the court presiding over MacArthur in the Southern District of Texas transferred the action to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On September 29, 2014, the parties stipulated to the remand (to Texas state court (Harris County)) and stay of MacArthur until further order of the court (in accordance with the court’s September 9, 2014 decision in Rishmague (discussed above)), which stipulation was “so ordered” by the court on October 14, 2014. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in MacArthur.
Florida suits: On February 14, 2013, five lawsuits were filed against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis Limited and Willis of Colorado, Inc. in Florida state court (Miami-Dade County) alleging violations of Florida common law. The five suits are: (1) Barbar, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05666CA27, filed on behalf of 35 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $30 million; (2) deGadala-Maria, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05669CA30, filed on behalf of 64 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $83.5 million; (3) Ranni, et ano. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05673CA06, filed on behalf of two Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $3 million; (4) Tisminesky, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05676CA09, filed on behalf of 11 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $6.5 million; and (5) Zacarias, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05678CA11, filed on behalf of 10 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $12.5 million. On June 3, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. removed all five cases to the Southern District of Florida and, on June 4, 2013, notified the JPML of the pendency of these related actions. On June 10, 2013, the court in Tisminesky issued an order sua sponte staying and administratively closing that action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation and coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On June 11, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. moved to stay the other four actions pending the JPML's transfer decision. On June 20, 2013, the JPML issued a conditional transfer order for the transfer of the five actions to the Northern District of Texas, the transmittal of which was stayed for seven days to allow for any opposition to be filed. On June 28, 2013, with no opposition having been filed, the JPML lifted the stay, enabling the transfer to go forward. On September 30, 2014, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to remand in Zacarias, and, on October 3, 2014, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motions to remand in Tisminesky and de Gadala Maria. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaints in these actions.
Janvey, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:13-CV-03980-D, was filed on October 1, 2013 also in the Northern District of Texas against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis Limited, Willis North America Inc., Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate. The complaint was filed (i) by Ralph S. Janvey, in his capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver for the Stanford Receivership Estate, and the Official Stanford Investors Committee (the ‘OSIC’) against all defendants and (ii) on behalf of a putative, worldwide class of Stanford investors against Willis North America Inc. Plaintiffs Janvey and the OSIC allege claims under Texas common law and the court’s Amended Order Appointing Receiver, and the putative class plaintiffs allege claims under Texas statutory and common law. Plaintiffs seek actual damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages and costs. On November 15, 2013, plaintiffs filed the operative First Amended Complaint, which added certain defendants unaffiliated with Willis. On February 28, 2014, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint, which motions were granted in part and denied in part by the court on December 5, 2014. On December 22, 2014, Willis filed a motion to amend the court’s December 5 order to certify an interlocutory appeal to the Fifth Circuit, and, on December 23, 2014, Willis filed a motion to amend and, to the extent necessary, reconsider the court’s December 5 order. On January 16, 2015, the defendants answered the First Amended Complaint. On January 28, 2015, the court denied Willis’s motion to amend the court’s December 5 order to certify an interlocutory appeal to the Fifth Circuit. Willis’s motion to amend and, to the extent necessary, reconsider the December 5 order remains pending.



26

Table Of Contents

Legal proceedings


As discussed above, on March 25, 2014, the parties in Troice and Janvey stipulated to the consolidation of the two actions for pre-trial purposes under Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On March 28, 2014, the Court “so ordered” that stipulation and, thus, consolidated Troice and Janvey for pre-trial purposes under Rule 42(a).
Additional actions could be brought in the future by other investors in certificates of deposit issued by Stanford and its affiliates. The Company disputes these allegations and intends to defend itself vigorously against these actions. The outcomes of these actions, however, including any losses or other payments that may occur as a result, cannot be predicted at this time.


Item 4 — Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.


27

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Part II
Item 5 —
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Share Data
Our shares have been traded on the New York Stock Exchange (‘NYSE’) under the symbol ‘WSH’ since June 11, 2001. The high and low sale prices of our shares, as reported by the NYSE, are set forth below for the periods indicated.
 
Price Range
of Shares
 High Low
2013: 
  
First Quarter$39.50
 $33.89
Second Quarter$43.02
 $37.86
Third Quarter$45.45
 $40.10
Fourth Quarter$47.22
 $42.15
2014: 
  
First Quarter$45.38
 $40.72
Second Quarter$44.49
 $40.47
Third Quarter$44.59
 $39.81
Fourth Quarter$45.66
 $39.11
2015:   
Through February 20, 2015$48.88
 $42.81
On February 20, 2015, the last reported sale price of our shares as reported by the NYSE was $47.75 per share. As of February 20, 2015 there were approximately 1,192 shareholders on record of our shares.
Dividends
We normally pay dividends on a quarterly basis to shareholders of record on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31. The dividend payment dates and amounts are as follows:
Payment Date$ Per Share
  
January 15, 2013$0.270
April 15, 2013$0.280
July 15, 2013$0.280
October 15, 2013$0.280
January 15, 2014$0.280
April 15, 2014$0.300
July 15, 2014$0.300
October 15, 2014$0.300
January 15, 2015$0.300

There are no governmental laws, decrees or regulations in Ireland which will restrict the remittance of dividends or other payments to non-resident holders of the Company’s shares.

28

Table of Contents

Share data and dividends

In circumstances where one of Ireland’s many exemptions from dividend withholding tax (‘DWT’) does not apply, dividends paid by the Company will be subject to Irish DWT (currently 20 percent). Residents of the United States should be exempt from Irish DWT provided relevant documentation supporting the exemption has been put in place. While the US-Ireland Double Tax Treaty contains provisions reducing the rate of Irish DWT in prescribed circumstances, it should generally be unnecessary for US residents to rely on the provisions of this treaty due to the wide scope of exemptions from Irish DWT available under Irish domestic law. Irish income tax may also arise in respect of dividends paid by the Company. However, US residents entitled to an exemption from Irish DWT generally have no Irish income tax liability on dividends.
With respect to non-corporate US shareholders, certain dividends from a qualified foreign corporation may be subject to reduced rates of taxation. A foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends received from that corporation on shares that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, such as our shares. Non-corporate US shareholders that do not meet a minimum holding period requirement for our shares during which they are not protected from the risk of loss or that elect to treat the dividend income as ‘investment income’ pursuant to section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation regardless of our status as a qualified foreign corporation. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends if the recipient of a dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. This disallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. US shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules given their particular circumstances.
Total Shareholder Return
The following graph demonstrates a five-year comparison of cumulative total returns for the Company, the S&P 500 and a peer group comprised of the Company, Aon plc, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., Brown & Brown Inc., and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. The comparison charts the performance of $100 invested in the Company, the S&P 500 and the peer group on December 31, 2009, assuming full dividend reinvestment.



29

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, no shares were issued by the Company without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The Company is authorized to buy back its ordinary shares, by way of redemption, and will consider whether to do so from time to time based on many factors including market conditions. The Company is authorized to purchase up to one billion shares from time to time in the open market (such open market purchases would be effected as redemptions under Irish law) and it may also redeem its shares through negotiated trades with persons who are not affiliated with the Company as long as the cost of the acquisition of the Company's shares does not exceed $611 million.
In the fourth quarter 2014, the Company bought back 244,300 shares at an average price of $40.86 for a total cost of approximately $10 million, on a trade date basis. The Company intends to buy back approximately $175 million in shares in 2015 to offset the increase in shares outstanding resulting from the exercise of employee stock options. The buybacks will be made in the open market or through privately-negotiated transactions, from time to time, depending on market conditions. The share buy back program may be modified, extended or terminated at any time by the Board of Directors.
Period:Total number of shares purchased Average price paid per share Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
        
October 1, 2014 to October 31, 2014244,300
 $40.86
 244,300
 $611,289,766
November 1, 2014 to November 30, 2014
 
 
 
December 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014
 
 
 
        
Total244,300
 

 244,300
  
The information under Part III, Item 12 regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference.




30

Table of Contents

Selected Financial Data

Item 6 —Selected Financial Data
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data
The selected consolidated financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and the related notes and Item 7 — ‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’ included elsewhere in this report.
The selected historical consolidated financial data presented below as of and for each of the five years ended December 31, 2014 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (‘US GAAP’).
 Year ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
 (millions, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data 
  
  
  
  
Total revenues$3,802
 $3,655
 $3,480
 $3,447
 $3,332
Goodwill impairment charge
 
 (492) 
 
Operating income (loss)647
 663
 (225) 571
 789
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and interest in earnings of associates518
 499
 (337) 239
 587
Income (loss) from continuing operations373
 377
 (433) 219
 470
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 1
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings$362
 $365
 $(446) $204
 $455
Earnings per share on continuing operations — basic2.03
 2.07
 (2.58) 1.17
 2.68
Earnings per share on continuing operations — diluted2.00
 2.04
 (2.58) 1.15
 2.66
Average number of shares outstanding 
  
  
  
  
— basic178
 176
 173
 173
 170
— diluted181
 179

173
 176
 171
Balance Sheet Data (as of year end) 
  
  
  
  
Goodwill$2,937
 $2,838
 $2,827
 $3,295
 $3,294
Other intangible assets, net450
 353
 385
 420
 492
Total assets (i)
15,435
 14,800
 15,112
 15,728
 15,850
Total equity2,007
 2,243
 1,725
 2,517
 2,608
Long-term debt2,142
 2,311
 2,338
 2,354
 2,157
Shares and additional paid-in capital1,524
 1,316
 1,125
 1,073
 985
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity1,985
 2,215
 1,699
 2,486
 2,577
Other Financial Data 
  
  
  
  
Capital expenditures (excluding capital leases)$110
 $105
 $133
 $111
 $83
Cash dividends declared per share1.20
 1.12
 1.08
 1.04
 1.04
_________________

(i)
The Company collects premiums from insureds and, after deducting its commissions, remits the premiums to the respective insurers; the Company also collects claims or refunds from insurers which it then remits to insureds. Uncollected premiums from insureds and uncollected claims or refunds from insurers (‘fiduciary receivables’) are recorded as fiduciary assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Unremitted insurance premiums, claims or refunds (‘fiduciary funds’) are also recorded within fiduciary assets.

31

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Item 7 —Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion includes references to non-GAAP financial measures as defined in Regulation G of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘SEC’). We present such non-GAAP financial measures, specifically underlying and organic non-GAAP financial measures, as we believe such information is of interest to the investment community because it provides additional meaningful methods of evaluating certain aspects of the Company’s operating performance from period to period on a basis that may not be otherwise apparent on a GAAP basis, and these provide a measure against which our businesses may be assessed in the future.
Underlying total revenues, underlying total expenses, underlying salaries and benefits, underlying other operating expenses, underlying operating income, underlying operating margin, underlying EBITDA, underlying net income and underlying earnings per diluted share (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "underlying measures") are calculated by excluding the impact of certain items and period over period movements in foreign currency, from the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Organic commissions and fees, total revenues, organic total expenses, organic salaries and benefits, organic other operating expenses, organic operating income, organic operating margin and organic EBITDA (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "organic measures") further adjust underlying measures to exclude the twelve month impact from acquisitions and disposals from the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Our methods of calculating these measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited. These financial measuresshould be viewed in addition to, not in lieu of, the consolidated financialstatements for the year ended December 31, 2014.
This discussion includes forward-looking statements, including under the headings 'Executive Summary', 'Liquidity and Capital Resources', and 'Critical Accounting Estimates'. Please see 'Forward-Looking Statements' forcertain cautionary information regarding forward-looking statements and a list offactors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted inthose statements.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Business Overview
We provide a broad range of insurance broking, risk management, and consulting services to our clients worldwide and during the period organized our business into three segments: Global, North America, and International.
For additional information regarding our business, see the more detailed discussion under Part I, Item 1 - 'Business' of this Form 10-K.

Market Conditions
Due to the cyclical nature of the insurance market and the impact of other market conditions on insurance premiums, commission revenues may vary widely between accounting periods. A period of low or declining premium rates, generally known as a ‘soft’ or ‘softening’ market, generally leads to downward pressure on commission revenues and can have a material adverse impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. A ‘hard’ or ‘firming’ market, during which premium rates rise, generally has a favorable impact on our commission revenues and operating margin. Rates, however, vary by geography, industry and client segment. As a result and due to the global and diverse nature of our business, we view rates in the aggregate.

Market conditions in our industry are generally defined by factors such as the strength of the economies in the various geographic regions in which we serve around the world, insurance rate movements, and insurance and reinsurance buying patterns of our clients.
Early in 2013, the reinsurance market was generally flat; however, as the year progressed we saw changing market sentiment driven by changes in the sources of capital and increases in capital supply in the reinsurance market, most notably within the North American catastrophe-exposed property market. The influx of third-party capital coupled with changes to reinsurance buying patterns and regulatory complexity is leading to growing complexity in the reinsurance market and a softening of prices.

32

Table of Contents

Business discussion

In 2014 we noted a continuation of this trend, and signs of acceleration, towards softening reinsurance rates across almost all classes of business and geographies as positive 2013 results for traditional reinsurers exacerbated the growing supply of capital from third-party investors. In addition, for primary insurance companies, the ability to recognize primary rate increases may be coming to an end and consequently, rate flattening and even rate reductions are seen in many territories on primary insurance classes.
In the face of this challenging environment, we have adopted a strategy to: (1) invest selectively in growth areas, defined by geography, industry sector, and client segment and (2) better coordinate our business so as to bring our clients greater access to the Company's specialty areas and analytical capabilities, among other things. Our growth strategy also involves increasing our investment in, and deployment of, our analytical capabilities.
Financial Performance
The following is a summary of our 2014 GAAP financial results:
Total revenues of $3,802 million increased by $147 million, or 4.0 percent over the prior year. This growth included $134 million increase in commissions and fees, led by our International segment which reported high single digit growth, and a net $26 million increase from the impact of acquisitions and disposals. Foreign exchange negatively impacted total revenues by $30 million.
Total operating expenses of $3,155 million increased by $163 million, or 5.4 percent over the prior year. This growth included $36 million of restructuring costs related to the Operational Improvement Program, a $34 million net increase in expenses from acquisitions and disposals, and $6 million adverse foreign currency movements. The remaining increase was primarily due to higher salaries and benefits expense driven by increased headcount, pay reviews, and higher incentive charges, along with increased travel, accommodation and entertainment expenses, and systems costs.
Operating margin decreased 110 basis points to 17.0 percent from 18.1 percent in the prior year.
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings was $362 million, or $2.00 per diluted share, a decrease of $3 million, or 0.8 percent, from $365 million, or $2.04 per diluted share, in 2013.
Cash flows from operating activities were $477 million in 2014, a decrease of $84 million, or 15.0 percent from $561 million in 2013.
Our non-GAAP financial measures were as follows:
Underlying total revenues of $3,802 million increased $177 million, or 4.9 percent, over the prior year. Excluding the net $26 million increase from acquisitions and disposals, organic total revenues increased $151 million, or 4.2 percent over the prior year. This growth was driven by high commissions and fees growth in our International segment, supported by growth in Willis North America and Global. In addition to this, Other income increased $12 million primarily due to a settlement related to a specialty book of business within Global.
Underlying total expenses of $3,119 million increased $168 million, or 5.7 percent, over the prior year. Excluding the net $34 million increase from acquisitions and disposals, organic total operating expenses of $3,066 million increased $134 million, or 4.6 percent, over the prior year. This was primarily due to higher salaries and benefits expense, driven by increased headcount, pay reviews, and higher incentive charges, along with increased travel, accommodation and entertainment expenses, and systems costs.
The resultant organic operating margin decreased by 20 basis points to 18.2 percent from 18.4 percent in the prior year.

Operational improvement program
In April 2014, the Company announced an operational improvement program that would allow the Company to continue to strengthen its client service, realize operational efficiencies, and invest in new capabilities for growth.

33

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


The main elements of the program include the following:
movement of more than 3,500 support roles from higher cost locations to Willis facilities in lower cost locations, bringing the ratio of employees in higher cost versus lower cost near-shore and off-shore centers from approximately 80:20 to approximately 60:40;
net workforce reductions in support positions;
lease consolidation in real estate and reductions in ratios of seats per employee and square footage of floor space per employee; and
information technology systems simplification and rationalization.
The program began in the second quarter of 2014 and is expected to be complete by the end of 2017. The program is expecting to deliver cumulative cost savings of at least $420 million through 2017 and annual cost savings of approximately $300 million starting in 2018.
Actual cost savings of approximately $11 million were achieved in 2014, the estimated phasing of future cost savings is as follows: at least $60 million in 2015, approximately $135 million in 2016, and approximately $235 million in 2017. The estimated cost savings are before any potential reinvestment for future growth.
To achieve these savings, the Company expects to incur cumulative spend, including capital expenditure, amounting to approximately $410 million through the end of 2017. Program spend in 2014 was $36 million, with approximately $130 million expected for 2015 and the balance of approximately $240 million expected to be incurred in 2016 and 2017.
Total spend, actual savings, and timing may vary positively or negatively from these estimates due to changes in the scope, underlying assumptions, or execution risk of the restructuring plan throughout its duration.
The Company expects that about 70 percent of the annualized 2018 savings would come from role relocation and reduction, and about 30 percent of the savings from real estate, information technology and other areas.
To assist with the analysis of the effectiveness of the program the Company will provide the following metrics annually:
ratio of full time employees (FTEs) in higher cost geographies to lower cost near-shore and off-shore centers as at December 31, 2014 was 78:22 (March 31, 2014 ratio was 80:20);
indexed ratio of square footage of real estate per FTE as at December 31, 2014 was 98 (March 31, 2014 ratio of square footage of real estate per FTE = 100); and
indexed ratio of desks per FTE as at December 31, 2014 was 99 (March 31, 2014 ratio of desks per FTE = 100).
The restructuring costs of $36 million related to the Operational Improvement Program incurred in 2014 included:
$3 million of termination benefits in the North America segment relating to the elimination of 51 positions across a number of North America retail locations;
$5 million in the International segment, of which approximately $3 million was termination benefits related to the elimination of 81 positions across the International network and approximately $2 million spent on professional services to support the program;
$11 million in the Global segment, including $10 million of termination benefits related to the elimination of approximately 181 positions from the Willis Insurance UK and UK Reinsurance divisions, in addition to approximately $1 million of professional fees related to a study on process improvement; and
$17 million in Corporate and other, including approximately $16 million of professional fees, primarily related to advisory services, and approximately $1 million related to system implementation and other core resources supporting the program.
Acquisitions and Disposals
In January, 2015 the Company reached an agreement to acquire a majority interest in Miller Insurance Services LLP, a leading London-based wholesale specialist. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approval and is expected to close in the second quarter of 2015.
During the year ended December 31, 2014 we made the following material acquisitions in line with our strategy to invest in targeted acquisitions with a focus on earnings accretion, competitive position, and fit.

34

Table of Contents

Business discussion

In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company acquired 75.8 percent of Max Matthiessen Holding AB and subsidiaries (collectively referred to as Max Matthiessen), a leading employee benefits adviser in Sweden, for cash consideration of $204 million.
In the second quarter of 2014, the Company acquired 100 percent of Charles Monat Limited and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as Charles Monat), a life insurance solutions adviser to high net worth clients based in Hong Kong, for cash consideration of $59 million. Additional consideration estimated at $29 million is payable in annual installments over the next five years, based on a multiple of EBITDA of the entities acquired, during the period from May 25, 2014 until September 2, 2019. This consideration has been assessed to have a fair value of $12 million at the date of acquisition.
During 2014 we have also disposed of a number of low growth offices and business from our North America reporting unit that no longer align strategically with the rest of the North America segment.

Non-GAAP financial measures
During 2014, we made changes to the non-GAAP financial measures that we use to provide additional meaningful methods of evaluating the Company’s operating performance replacing our adjusted measures with new underlying measures and introduced new organic non-GAAP financial measures.
Previously we excluded certain specified items from total expenses, salaries and benefits, other operating expenses, operating margin, operating income, net income (loss) and earnings per share to calculate adjusted total expenses, adjusted salaries and benefits, adjusted other operating expenses, adjusted operating margin, adjusted operating income, adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share.
In addition to these certain specified items, we exclude the period-over-period foreign currency movements to calculate our underlying non-GAAP financial measures and further exclude the twelve month impact from acquisitions and disposals to calculate our organic non-GAAP financial measures.
We believe that the understanding of the Company's performance and comparative analysis of our results is enhanced by our disclosure of the following non-GAAP financial measures. We use these and other measures to establish Group performance targets and evaluate the performance of our operations.
Our method for calculating these measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited.
Underlying measures
Our underlying non-GAAP measures are calculated by excluding certain items (as detailed below) from total revenues, total expenses, salaries and benefits, other operating expenses, operating income, net income (loss), and earnings per diluted share, respectively, the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Additionally, prior year total revenues, total expenses and net income (loss) and diluted earnings per share have been rebased to current period exchange rates to eliminate the impact of year over year foreign exchange movements.
The following items have been excluded from total revenues, total expenses, salaries and benefits, other operating expenses, operating income and net income (loss) as applicable:
(i)restructuring charges relating the Operational Improvement Program;
(ii)costs associated with the 2013 Expense Reduction Initiative;
(iii)fees related to the extinguishment of debt;
(iv)the additional incentive accrual recognized following the replacement of annual cash retention awards with annual cash bonuses which do not feature a repayment requirement;
(v)write-off of unamortized cash retention awards following the decision to eliminate the repayment requirement on past awards;
(vi)India joint venture settlement;
(vii)goodwill impairment charge;

35

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


(viii)valuation allowance against deferred tax assets;
(ix)write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance and associated legal fees arising in Chicago due to fraudulent overstatement of commissions and fees;
(x)insurance recoveries related to the fraudulent overstatement of commissions and fees;
(xi)foreign exchange loss from the devaluation of the Venezuelan currency; and
(xii)gains and losses on the disposal of operations.

Organic measures

Our organic non-GAAP measures are calculated by excluding the twelve month impact from acquisitions and disposals, together with the impact of certain items, including foreign currency, that are discussed above, from total revenues, total expenses, salaries and benefits, other operating expenses, operating income, respectively, the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

A reconciliation of reported total expenses, salaries and benefits and other operating expense, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying and organic total expenses, underlying and organic salaries and benefits and underlying and organic other operating expenses is as follows (in millions, except percentages):
2014 compared to 2013
 Salaries and benefits Other operating expenses Total expenses
 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013
Expenses, GAAP basis$2,314
 $2,207
 $659
 $636
 $3,155
 $2,992
Excluding:           
Restructuring costs
 
 
 
 36
 
Expense Reduction Initiative
 29
 
 12
 
 46
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt
 
 
 1
 
 1
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (3) 
 (2) 
 (6)
Underlying expenses$2,314
 $2,181
 $659
 $625
 $3,119
 $2,951
Less: net expenses from acquisitions and disposals33
 13
 12
 3
 53
 19
Organic expenses$2,281
 $2,168
 $647
 $622
 $3,066
 $2,932

(a)For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


36

Table of Contents

Business discussion

A reconciliation of reported total expenses, salaries and benefits and other operating expense, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying and organic total expenses, underlying and organic salaries and benefits and underlying and organic other operating expenses is as follows (in millions, except percentages):
2013 compared to 2012
 Salaries and benefits Other operating expenses Total expenses
 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012
Expenses, GAAP basis$2,207
 $2,475
 $636
 $600
 $2,992
 $3,705
Excluding:      

    
Expense Reduction Initiative29
 
 12
 
 46
 
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt
 
 1
 
 1
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy
 252
 
 
 
 252
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor
 200
 
 
 
 200
Goodwill impairment charge
 
 
 
 
 492
India JV settlement
 
 
 11
 
 11
Insurance recovery
 
 
 (10) 
 (10)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance
 
 
 13
 
 13
Foreign currency movements (a)

 9
 
 
 
 9
Underlying expenses$2,178
 $2,014
 $623
 $586
 $2,945
 $2,738
Less: net expenses from acquisitions and disposals12
 1
 1
 
 14
 1
Organic expenses$2,166
 $2,013
 $622
 $586
 $2,931
 $2,737

(a)For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.

37

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


A reconciliation of reported total revenues and operating income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to underlying and organic total revenues, and underlying and organic operating income, is as follows (in millions, except percentages):
2014 compared to 2013
 2014 2013
Total revenues, GAAP basis$3,802
 $3,655
Excluding:   
Foreign currency movements (a)

 30
Underlying total revenue$3,802
 $3,625
Less: net revenue from acquisitions and disposals56
 30
Organic total revenue$3,746
 $3,595
    
Operating income, GAAP basis$647
 $663
Excluding:   
Restructuring costs36
 
Expense Reduction Initiative
 46
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt
 1
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (36)
Underlying operating income$683
 $674
Less: net operating income from acquisitions and disposals3
 11
Organic operating income$680
 $663
    
Operating margin, GAAP basis, or operating income as a percentage of total revenues17.0% 18.1%
Underlying operating margin, or underlying operating income as a percentage of underlying total revenues18.0% 18.6%
Organic operating margin, or organic operating income as a percentage of organic total revenues18.2% 18.4%

(a)
For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


38

Table of Contents

Business discussion

A reconciliation of reported total revenues and operating income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to underlying and organic revenues, and underlying and organic operating income, is as follows (in millions, except percentages):

2013 compared to 2012
 2013 2012
Total revenues, GAAP basis3,655
 3,480
Excluding:   
Foreign currency movements (a)

 13
Underlying total revenue$3,655
 $3,467
Less: net revenue from acquisitions and disposals56
 2
Organic total revenue$3,599
 $3,465
    
Operating income (loss), GAAP basis663
 (225)
Excluding:   
Expense Reduction Initiative46
 
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt1
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy
 252
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor
 200
Goodwill impairment charge
 492
India JV settlement
 11
Insurance recovery
 (10)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance
 13
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (4)
Underlying operating income$710
 $729
Less: net operating income from acquisitions and disposals42
 1
Organic operating income$668
 $728
    
Operating margin, GAAP basis, or operating income as a percentage of total revenues18.1% (6.5)%
Underlying operating margin, or underlying operating income as a percentage of underlying total revenues19.4% 21.0 %
Organic operating margin, or organic operating income as a percentage of organic total revenues18.6% 21.0 %

(a)
For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.



39

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


A reconciliation of reported net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying and organic EBITDA, is as follows (in millions, except per share data):
2014 compared to 2013
 2014 2013
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings, GAAP basis$362
 $365
Excluding:   
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest11
 12
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax(14) 
Income taxes159
 122
Interest expense135
 126
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 60
Other (income) expense, net(6) (22)
Depreciation92
 94
Amortization54
 55
Restructuring costs36
 
Expense reduction initiative
 41
Fees relating to the extinguishment of debt
 1
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (35)
Underlying EBITDA$829
 $819
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions and disposals11
 11
Organic EBITDA$818
 $808

(a)
For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


40

Table of Contents

Business discussion

A reconciliation of reported net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying and organic EBITDA, is as follows (in millions, except per share data):
2013 compared to 2012
 2013 2012
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings, GAAP basis$365
 (446)
Excluding:   
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest12
 13
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 (5)
Income taxes122
 101
Interest expense126
 128
Loss on extinguishment of debt60
 
Other (income) expense, net(22) (16)
Depreciation94
 79
Amortization55
 59
Expense reduction initiative41
 
Fees relating to the extinguishment of debt1
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy
 252
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor
 200
Goodwill impairment charge
 492
India JV settlement
 11
Insurance recovery
 (10)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance
 13
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (4)
Underlying EBITDA$854
 $867
Less: EBITDA from acquisitions and disposals43
 1
Organic EBITDA$811
 $866

(a)
For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


41

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc



A reconciliation of reported net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings and reported earnings per diluted share, the most directly comparable GAAP measures, to underlying net income and underlying earnings per diluted share, is as follows (in millions, except per share data):
2014 compared to 2013
     Per diluted share
 2014 2013 2014 2013
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings, GAAP$362
 $365
 $2.00
 $2.04
Excluding:       
Operational Improvement Program27
 
 0.15
 
Venezuela currency devaluation13
 
 0.07
 
Expense reduction initiative
 38
 
 0.21
Fees relating to the extinguishment of debt
 1
 
 0.01
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 60
 
 0.34
Gain on disposal of operations(2) (1) (0.01) (0.01)
Impact of US valuation allowance21
 9
 0.12
 0.05
Dilutive impact of potentially issuable shares
 
 
 
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (34) 
 (0.19)
Underlying net income$421
 $438
 $2.33
 $2.45

2013 compared to 2012
     Per diluted share
 2013 2012 2013 2012
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings, GAAP$365
 $(446) $2.04
 $(2.58)
Excluding:       
(Gain) loss on disposal of operations(1) 3
 (0.01) 0.02
Expense reduction initiative38
 
 0.21
 
Fees relating to the extinguishment of debt1
 
 0.01
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt60
 
 0.34
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy
 175
 
 0.99
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor
 138
 
 0.78
Goodwill impairment charge
 458
 
 2.60
India JV settlement
 11
 
 0.06
Insurance recovery
 (6) 
 (0.03)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance
 8
 
 0.05
Impact of US valuation allowance9
 113
 0.05
 0.64
Dilutive impact of potentially issuable shares
 
 
 0.05
Foreign currency movements (a)

 (4) 
 (0.02)
Underlying net income$472
 $450
 $2.64
 $2.56

(a)
For prior periods, underlying measures have been rebased to current period exchange rates to remove the impact of foreign currency movements when comparing periods.


42

Table of Contents

Business discussion

REVIEW OF CONSOLIDATED RESULTS
The following table is a summary of our revenues, operating income (loss), operating margin, net income (loss) and diluted earnings per share (in millions, except per share data and percentages):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
REVENUES 
  
  
Commissions and fees$3,767
 $3,633
 $3,458
Investment income16
 15
 18
Other income19
 7
 4
Total revenues3,802
 3,655
 3,480
EXPENSES 
  
  
Salaries and benefits(2,314) (2,207) (2,475)
Other operating expenses(659) (636) (600)
Depreciation expense(92) (94) (79)
Amortization of intangible assets(54) (55) (59)
Goodwill impairment charge
 
 (492)
Restructuring costs(36) 
 
Total expenses(3,155) (2,992) (3,705)
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)647
 663
 (225)
Other income (expense), net6
 22
 16
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 (60) 
Interest expense(135) (126) (128)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES518
 499
 (337)
Income taxes(159) (122) (101)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES359
 377
 (438)
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax14
 
 5
NET INCOME (LOSS)373
 377
 (433)
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(11) (12) (13)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$362
 $365
 $(446)
      
Salaries and benefits as a percentage of total revenues60.9% 60.4% 71.1 %
Other operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues17.3% 17.4% 17.2 %
Operating margin (operating income (loss) as a percentage of total revenues)17.0% 18.1% (6.5)%
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations$2.00
 $2.04
 $(2.58)
Average diluted number of shares outstanding181
 179
 173


43

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Consolidated Results for 2014 compared to 2013
Revenues
Total revenues by segment for 2014 and 2013 are shown below (millions, except percentages):
       Change attributable to:
Year ended December 31,2014 2013 % Change Foreign
currency translation
 Acquisitions
and disposals
 
Organic
commissions and fees growth
(a)
          
Global$1,386
 $1,358
 2.1% 0.9 % (0.2)% 1.4%
North America1,365
 1,349
 1.2% (0.1)% (1.5)% 2.8%
International1,016
 926
 9.7% (5.1)% 5.8 % 9.0%
Commissions and fees$3,767
 $3,633
 3.7% (0.9)% 0.8 % 3.8%
Investment income16
 15
 6.7%  
  
  
Other income19
 7
 171.4%  
  
  
Total revenues$3,802
 $3,655
 4.0%  
  
  
_________________
(a)
Organic commissions and fees growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; and (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented. Our methods of calculating this measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited.

Total revenues of $3,802 million increased by $147 million, or 4.0 percent, in 2014 compared to 2013. This was primarily due to 3.7 percent growth in commissions and fees.
Total commissions and fees in 2014 were $3,767 million, up $134 million, or 3.7 percent, from $3,633 million in 2013. This increase was comprised of organic growth of $134 million, or 3.8 percent, and growth through acquisitions and disposals of $28 million, or 0.8 percent, partially offset by negative foreign currency movements of $30 million or 0.9 percent.
The foreign currency impact was as a result of the strengthening of the US dollar against a number of currencies that our commissions and fees are earned in, most significantly the Euro, Australian dollar and Brazilian real, partially offset by the year-on-year weakening of the US dollar against the Pound Sterling.
The Global segment reported 2.1 percent growth in commissions and fees, comprising 1.4 percent organic growth and a 0.9 percent positive impact from foreign currency translation. This growth was partially offset by a net 0.2 percent decline from acquisitions and disposals primarily due to a disposal in third quarter 2013.
Organic commissions and fees growth of 1.4 percent was driven by strong new business growth and higher client retention levels compared with the year ago period, partially offset by the negative impact from declining insurance and reinsurance rates and significant construction projects in 2013 that did not recur in 2014.
The North America segment reported 1.2 percent growth in commissions and fees compared to 2013 including organic growth of 2.8 percent partially offset by 1.5 percent negative impact from the disposal of non-strategic low growth offices, and a negative 0.1 percent impact from foreign currency translation.
The International segment reported 9.7 percent growth in commissions and fees compared with 2013, comprising 9.0 percent organic growth and 5.8 percent positive impact from the acquisitions of Max Matthiessen and Charles Monat. This was partially offset by a 5.1 percent negative impact from foreign currency translation.
Organic commissions and fees growth by segment is discussed further in 'Review of Segmental Results', below.
Other income reported an increase of $12 million compared to 2013. This increase was primarily due to a $12 million settlement related to a specialty book of business within the Global segment.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits were $107 million, or 4.8 percent, higher in 2014 compared with 2013 and includes a net $20 million increase from acquisitions and disposals, $3 million of adverse foreign currency movements, and $29 million benefit from the

44

Table of Contents

Business discussion

non-recurrence of 2013 expense reduction initiative costs. The remaining increase of $113 million was driven by increased headcount, pay reviews, and higher incentives.
Other Expenses
Other operating expenses were $23 million, or 3.6 percent, higher in 2014 compared with 2013. This growth included a net $9 million increase from acquisitions and disposals, $2 million of adverse foreign currency movements, $12 million benefit from the non-recurrence of 2013 expense reduction initiative costs and marketing costs. The remaining increase of $25 million was primarily due to higher travel, accommodation and entertainment expenses, along with increased systems costs.
Depreciation expense was $92 million in 2014, compared with $94 million in 2013. The decrease of $2 million included $5 million benefit from non-recurrence of 2013 expense reduction initiative costs offset by $1 million of adverse foreign currency movements.
Amortization of intangible assets was $54 million in 2014, a reduction of $1 million compared to 2013. The decrease primarily reflects the ongoing reduction in the HRH acquisition amortization partially offset by the increased charge relating to the acquisition of Charles Monat and Max Matthiessen.
Restructuring costs related to our operational improvement program were $36 million in 2014, compared with $nil in 2013. This is discussed in further detail in the 'Operational improvement program' section in the executive summary section above.

Income Taxes
The tax rate for 2014 was 31 percent, compared with 24 percent for 2013. Both years were impacted by certain items and the continuing requirement to retain a valuation allowance against our US deferred tax assets. The increase in tax rate over the prior year is partly attributable to the US returning to a tax paying position for the 2014 tax year.
After adjusting for certain items, as listed below, the tax rate for 2014 was 25 percent: 
a tax benefit of $1 million associated with the $14 million pre-tax expense arising in relation to the Venezuela currency devaluation;
a tax benefit of $9 million associated with charges incurred in relation to the Operational Improvement Program;
a tax expense of $10 million associated with pre-tax gains of $12 million related to business disposals;
an expense of $21 million relating to an increase in US valuation allowance. The increase is attributable to a change in the US deferred tax position following resolution of uncertain tax positions from prior periods.

Interest in Earnings of Associates, net of Tax

The majority of our interest in earnings of associates relates to our share of ownership of Gras Savoye, the leading broker in France. Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax, in 2014 was $14 million compared to $nil in 2013. The increase was primarily due to the non-recurrence of charges relating to the 2013 reorganization program and other non-recurring items, with improved underlying financial performance, in Gras Savoye.


45

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Consolidated Results for 2013 compared to 2012
Revenues
Total revenues by segment for 2013 and 2012 are shown below (millions, except percentages):
       Change attributable to:
Year ended December 31,2013 2012 % Change Foreign
currency translation
 Acquisitions
and disposals
 
Organic
commissions and fees growth
(a)
          
Global$1,358
 $1,303
 4.2 % (0.9)% 0.8% 4.3%
North America1,349
 1,281
 5.3 % (0.1)% 0.6% 4.8%
International926
 874
 5.9 % 0.1 % % 5.8%
Commissions and fees$3,633
 $3,458
 5.1 % (0.3)% 0.5% 4.9%
Investment income15
 18
 (16.7)%  
  
  
Other income7
 4
 75.0 %  
  
  
Total revenues$3,655
 $3,480
 5.0 %  
  
  
_________________
(a)
Organic commissions and fees growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; and (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented.

Our methods of calculating these measures may differ from those used by other companies and therefore comparability may be limited.

Total revenues increased by $175 million, or 5.0 percent, in 2013 compared to 2012. This was primarily due to 4.9 percent growth in organic commissions and fees, partially offset by a 0.3 percent negative impact from foreign exchange and a $3 million decrease in investment income due to continued falling yields on deposits.
Total commissions and fees in 2013 were $3,633 million, up $175 million, or 5.1 percent, from $3,458 million in 2012. This increase was due to organic growth of 4.9 percent and growth through acquisitions and disposals of 0.5 percent partially offset by negative foreign currency movements of $13 million or 0.3 percent.
Organic growth of 4.9 percent was driven by low double-digit new business growth tempered by lost business.
Commissions and fees were reduced by a net $9 million impact of two revenue recognition adjustments in the North America and International segments discussed below.
The Global segment reported 4.2 percent growth in commissions and fees, comprising 4.3 percent organic growth, a 0.8 percent positive impact from acquisitions and disposals, and a 0.9 percent negative impact from foreign currency translation. Organic commissions and fees growth of 4.3 percent was led by high single-digit growth in Reinsurance, where all the divisions reported positive growth. Global Specialties reported mid single-digit growth primarily due to strong growth from Financial and Executive Risk, and P&C and Construction.
The North America segment reported a 5.3 percent growth in organic commissions and fees, compared to 2012, comprising 4.8 percent organic commissions and fees growth, a 0.6 percent positive impact from acquisition of Avalon Actuarial Inc., and a 0.1 percent negative impact from foreign currency translation. Organic growth in commissions and fees was positively impacted by a $5 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in the North America Personal Lines business with the rest of the Group.
The International segment reported 5.9 percent growth in commissions and fees compared with 2012, comprising 5.8 percent organic commissions and fees growth and a 0.1 percent positive impact from foreign currency translation. Organic growth in commissions and fees included the negative impact of a $15 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in China with the rest of the Group.
Investment income in 2013 at $15 million was $3 million lower than in 2012. Organic commissions and fees growth by segment is discussed further in 'Review of Segmental Results', below.
Salaries and Benefits

Salaries and benefits increased by $268 million, or 10.8 percent, in 2013 compared with 2012. Foreign currency movements lowered salaries and benefits by $9 million, or 0.4 percent.

46

Table of Contents

Business discussion

In 2012 we recorded a $452 million charge as a result of the change in remuneration policy for future incentive awards and the elimination of the repayment requirement on past awards. Excluding the impact of this change and foreign currency movements, salaries and benefits were up by $193 million or 9.5 percent. This increase is primarily due to annual salary reviews, increased headcount from targeted investments, increased incentives from the change in remuneration policy and growth in commissions and fees, and an additional charge to increase the 401(k) match in North America. It also includes $29 million relating to the Expense Reduction Initiative that was undertaken in first quarter 2013.
Other Expenses
Other operating expenses were $36 million, or 6.0 percent, higher in 2013 compared with 2012. The $36 million increase includes $12 million of costs that were incurred in first quarter 2013 as part of our Expense Reduction Initiative.
The remaining $24 million increase was primarily due to higher business development costs, consulting and professional fees to assist us in our growth initiatives, and marketing costs.
Depreciation expense was $94 million in 2013, compared with $79 million in 2012. The increase of $15 million includes $5 million which was incurred in first quarter 2013 relating to the rationalization of property and systems as part of our Expense Reduction Initiative. The remaining $10 million increase is primarily due to a number of significant information technology related projects becoming operational during the year and the write-off of replaced systems and other assets
Amortization of intangible assets was $55 million in 2013, a reduction of $4 million compared to 2012. The decrease primarily reflects the ongoing reduction in the HRH acquisition amortization.
Goodwill impairment charge was $nil in 2013 (2012: $492 million). This was a non-cash charge recognized related to the impairment of the carrying value of the North America reporting unit's goodwill. For further information on our testing for goodwill impairment, see 'Critical Accounting Estimates', below.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
The Company incurred total losses on extinguishment of debt of $60 million during the year ended December 31, 2013. This was made up of a tender premium of $65 million, the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of $2 million and a credit for the reduction of the fair value adjustment on 5.625% senior notes due 2015 of $7 million.
Income Taxes

The effective tax rate on ordinary income for 2013 was 20 percent, compared with 25 percent for 2012. The effective tax rate on ordinary income is calculated before the impact of certain discrete items. Discrete items occurring in 2013 with a significant impact on the tax rate were:
an incremental US tax expense of $9 million recorded after the taking into account the impact of adjustments to the valuation allowance placed against US deferred tax assets, US costs of $16 million associated with the Expense Reduction Initiative, and US costs of $61 million associated with the extinguishment of debt;

further non-US costs of $30 million associated with the Expense Reduction Initiative that are generally relieved at a rate higher than the underlying rate;

a net benefit of $4 million associated with a reduction in the corporation tax rate being applied to temporary tax differences in the UK;

a net benefit of $7 million associated with a change in the recognition of unrecognized tax benefits outside of the US; and

a net expense of $1 million associated with tax on profits of prior periods to bring in line the Company’s tax provision to filed tax positions.
Including the impact of discrete items, the tax rate for 2013 was 24 percent. This compares to a tax charge of $101 million recorded on the net loss from continuing operations of $337 million in 2012.

47

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


Interest in Earnings of Associates, net of Tax

The majority of our interest in earnings of associates relates to our share of ownership of Gras Savoye, the leading broker in France. Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax, in 2013 was $nil compared to $5 million in 2012. The decline was mainly driven by lower net income recorded in Gras Savoye due to the costs recognized in relation to a reorganization program undertaken in the year designed to drive growth in revenues and operational efficiencies.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity

We believe that our balance sheet and strong cash flow provide us with the platform and flexibility to remain committed to our cash allocation strategy of:

investing in the business for growth;
value-creating merger and acquisition activity;
generating a steadily rising dividend; and
the repurchase of shares.

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash from operations, available cash and cash equivalents and amounts available under our revolving credit facilities, excluding the UK facility which is solely for use by our main regulated UK entity in certain exceptional circumstances, and the Willis Securities facility, which is solely used for regulatory capital and securities underwriting purposes only.
Our principal short-term uses of liquidity and capital resources are operating expenses, capital expenditures, dividends and repurchase of shares, funding defined benefit pension plans, and servicing of debt.
Our long-term liquidity requirements consist of the repayment of the principal amount of outstanding notes; borrowings under our 7-year term loan; and funding defined benefit pension plans as discussed below.
As at December 31, 2014 cash and cash equivalents were $635 million, a decrease of $161 million compared to December 31, 2013. Included within cash and cash equivalents is $545 million available for corporate purposes and $90 million held within our regulated UK entities for regulatory capital adequacy requirements.
Cash flows from operating activities fell to $477 million in 2014 from $561 million in 2013. In addition, $6 million was provided from the disposal of fixed and intangible assets (2013: $12 million), $134 million proceeds from the issue of shares (2013: $155 million), and $86 million proceeds from the disposal of operations (2013: $20 million).
As at December 31, 2014 there was $nil drawn down on all four of our revolving credit facilities (2013: $nil). During the year ended December 31, 2014, we made five drawings totaling $1,175 million and five repayments of $1,175 million on the Willis Securities facility.
The primary uses of funds during 2014 included $401 million cash payments of 2013 incentive awards, $210 million related to payments of dividends, $122 million cash contributions, including employees' salary sacrifice contributions, to our defined benefit pension schemes, capital expenditures of $113 million related to leasehold improvements, information technology and transformation projects, $241 million related to acquisitions, primarily Max Matthiessen Holding AB and Charles Monat Limited, and a $4 million deferred cash payment related to the partial acquisition of the remaining noncontrolling interest in our China operation in a prior period.
The Company is authorized to buy back its ordinary shares by way of redemption, and will consider whether to do so from time
to time based on many factors including market conditions. During 2014, the Company bought back 5,050,000 shares for a total cost of $213 million. In February 2015, Willis announced that it intends to buy back approximately $175 million in shares in 2015 to offset the increase in shares outstanding resulting from the exercise of employee stock options.
Based on current market conditions and information available to us at this time, we believe that we have sufficient liquidity to meet our cash needs for the next twelve months.

48

Table of Contents

Business discussion

The impact of movements in liquidity, debt and EBITDA in 2014 had a positive impact on the interest coverage ratio and a positive impact on the leverage ratio. Both ratios remain well within the requirements of the revolving credit facility covenants.

Debt
Total debt, total equity and the capitalization ratio at December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows (in millions, except percentages):
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Long-term debt$2,142
 $2,311
Current portion of long-term debt$167
 $15
Total debt$2,309
 $2,326
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity$1,985
 $2,215
Capitalization ratio53.8% 51.2%
At December 31, 2014 the only mandatory debt repayments falling due over the next 12 months are $148 million outstanding on our 5.625% senior notes, scheduled repayments on our 7-year term loan totaling $17 million, and $1 million outstanding on our 3-year term loan.
Cash flow
Summary consolidated cash flow information (in millions):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Cash provided by operating activities 
  
  
Total net cash provided by operating activities$477
 $561
 $525
Cash flows from investing activities 
  
  
Total net cash used in continuing investing activities(276) (120) (172)
Cash flows from financing activities 
  
  
Total net cash used in continuing financing activities(323) (137) (291)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(122) 304
 62
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(39) (8) 2
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year796
 500
 436
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year$635
 $796
 $500
This summary consolidated cash flow should be viewed in addition to, not in lieu of, the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Cash Flow for 2014 compared to 2013
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2014 decreased by $84 million to $477 million compared with 2013.
The $477 million cash from operations comprises net income of $373 million, net $257 million of non-cash adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities and $150 million of negative working capital movements.
The non-cash adjustments included depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation and provisions for deferred income taxes.
Movements in working capital included $401 million of incentive payments and $122 million cash contributions (including $10 million for employees’ salary sacrifice) to our defined benefit pension schemes. Additionally, there was a $66 million increase in accounts receivable, as revenue recognized in 2014 was greater than cash collection, and $432 million positive movement in other liabilities which included incentives accrued during 2014 that will be paid in 2015.

49

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


The $84 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily driven by lower reported operating income, the non-recurrence of closed-out derivative contracts in the prior year, increased working capital and higher cash taxes paid.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities in 2014 was $276 million. This included capital expenditure of $113 million, cash used to purchase subsidiaries, intangible assets and other investments of $255 million partly offset by $6 million cash received from the sale of fixed and intangible assets and $86 million of proceeds from the disposal of operations.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities in 2014 was $323 million primarily due to dividends paid, including dividends paid to noncontrolling interests, of $227 million, $213 million to repurchase approximately five million shares and $15 million of mandatory repayments against the term loan offset by cash receipts of $134 million from the issue of shares.
Consolidated Cash Flow for 2013 compared to 2012
Net cash provided by operating activities in 2013 increased by $36 million to $561 million compared with 2012.
The $561 million cash from operations comprises net income of $377 million, net $313 million of non-cash adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities and working capital movements.
The non-cash adjustments included depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, share-based compensation, gain on derivative instruments, provision for deferred income taxes and the tender premium on early redemption of our debt, which is presented as a financing cash item.
Movements in working capital included $346 million of incentive payments and $150 million cash contributions (including $12 million for employees’ salary sacrifice) to our defined benefit pension schemes. Additionally, there was a $116 million increase in accounts receivable, as revenue recognized in 2013 was greater than cash collection, and $445 million positive movement in other liabilities which included incentives accrued during 2013 that will be paid in 2014.
The $36 million increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily driven by favorable movements in working capital versus the prior year.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities in 2013 was $120 million including, capital expenditure of $112 million, cash used to purchase subsidiaries, intangible assets and other investments of $44 million partly offset by $6 million cash received from the sale of fixed and intangible assets and $24 million of proceeds from the disposal of operations and the sale of the Company’s holding in a Spanish associate company.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities in 2013 was $137 million primarily due to total dividends paid, including dividends paid to noncontrolling interests, of $203 million, a net $72 million outflow in relation to the refinancing in the third quarter 2013, discussed below, and $15 million of mandatory repayments against the term loan offset by cash receipts of $155 million from the issue of shares.
The refinancing during 2013 resulted in a net cash outflow of $72 million which included: $521 million cash paid to repurchase $202 million of 5.625% senior notes due 2015, $206 million of 6.200% senior notes due 2017 and $113 million of 7.000% senior notes due 2019, the tender premium of $65 million and debt issuance costs of $8 million; this was primarily funded by $522 million cash inflow from senior notes issued, discussed earlier, and free operating cash flows.
Own funds
As of December 31, 2014, we had cash and cash equivalents of $635 million, compared with $796 million at December 31, 2013. Additionally, $1,222 million was available to draw under our revolving credit facilities at December 31, 2014, compared with $822 million at December 31, 2013.

50

Table of Contents

Business discussion

Fiduciary funds
As an intermediary, we hold funds generally in a fiduciary capacity for the account of third parties, typically as the result of premiums received from clients that are in transit to insurers and claims due to clients that are in transit from insurers. We report premiums, which are held on account of, or due from, clients as assets with a corresponding liability due to the insurers. Claims held by, or due to, us which are due to clients are also shown as both assets and liabilities.
Fiduciary funds are generally required to be kept in certain regulated bank accounts subject to guidelines which emphasize capital preservation and liquidity; such funds are not available to service the Company’s debt or for other corporate purposes. Notwithstanding the legal relationships with clients and insurers, the Company is entitled to retain investment income earned on fiduciary funds in accordance with industry custom and practice and, in some cases, as supported by agreements with insureds.
As of December 31, 2014, we had fiduciary funds of $1.9 billion, compared with $1.7 billion at December 31, 2013.
Share buybacks

The Company is authorized to buy back shares, by way of redemption, and will consider whether to do so from time to time, based on many factors, including market conditions. The Company is authorized to purchase up to one billion shares from time to time in the open market (such open market purchases would be effected as redemptions under Irish law) and it may also redeem its shares through negotiated trades with persons who are not affiliated with the Company as long as the cost of the acquisition of the Company's shares does not exceed a certain authorized limit.

In February 2015, the Company announced that, during the year, it intended to buyback approximately $175 million of shares under this authorization, from time to time, depending on many factors including market conditions to offset the increase in shares outstanding resulting from the exercise of employee stock options. The buybacks would be made in the open market or through privately-negotiated transactions, from time to time, depending on market conditions.

As of February 20, 2015 there remains approximately $611 million available to purchase ordinary shares under the current authorization.
The share buy back program may be modified, extended or terminated at any time by the Board of Directors.
Dividends
Cash dividends paid in 2014 were $210 million compared with $193 million in 2013 and $185 million in 2012. In February 2015, we declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.31 per share, an annual rate of $1.24 per share, an increase of 3.3 percent over the prior 12 month period.



51

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


REVIEW OF SEGMENTAL RESULTS
During 2014, we organized our business into three segments: Global, North America and International. Our Global business provided specialist brokerage and consulting services to clients worldwide for risks arising from specific industries and activities. North America and International comprised our retail operations and provide services to small, medium and major corporations.
The following table is a summary of our operating results by segment for the three years ended December 31, 2014 (in millions except percentages):
 2014 2013 2012
 Revenues Operating
Income (Loss)
 
Operating
Margin
 Revenues 
Operating
Income (Loss)
 
Operating
Margin
 Revenues Operating
Income (Loss)
 
Operating
Margin
Global$1,410
 $352
 25.0% $1,364
 $376
 27.6% $1,310
 $400
 30.5 %
North America1,370
 273
 19.9% 1,358
 249
 18.3% 1,288
 252
 19.6 %
International1,022
 197
 19.3% 933
 178
 19.1% 882
 167
 18.9 %
Total Segments3,802
 822
 21.6% 3,655
 803
 22.0% 3,480
 819
 23.5 %
Corporate & Other
 (175) n/a
 
 (140) n/a
 
 (1,044) n/a
Total Consolidated$3,802
 $647
 17.0% $3,655
 $663
 18.1% $3,480
 $(225) (6.5)%
Global
Our Global operations comprised Willis Re, Willis Insurance UK, Facultative, Risk, and Willis Capital Markets & Advisory (WCMA).
The following table sets out revenues, operating income, organic commissions and fees growth and operating margin for the three years ended December 31, 2014 (in millions, except percentages):
 2014 2013 2012
Commissions and fees$1,386
 $1,358
 $1,303
Investment income9
 6
 7
Other income (a)
15
 
 
Total revenues$1,410
 $1,364
 $1,310
Operating income$352
 $376
 $400
Revenue growth3.4% 4.1% 3.0%
Organic commissions and fees growth (b)
1.4% 4.3% 4.7%
Operating margin25.0% 27.6% 30.5%
_________________
(a)
Other income comprises gains on disposal of intangible assets, which primarily arise from settlements through enforcing non-compete agreements in the event of losing accounts through producer defection or the disposal of books of business.
(b)Organic commissions and fees growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; and (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented.
2014 compared to 2013
Revenues
Commissions and fees of $1,386 million were $28 million, or 2.1 percent, higher in 2014 compared with 2013. The increase includes organic growth of 1.4 percent, a positive 0.9 percent impact from foreign currency movements, partially offset by a net 0.2 percent decline due to acquisitions and disposals.
The 1.4 percent organic growth in commissions and fees was driven by strong new business growth and higher client retention levels compared with the year ago period, partially offset by the negative impact of rates and the non-recurrence of significant construction projects in 2013.
The 0.2 percent decline from acquisitions and disposals was related to the disposal of a small commercial business from the UK Retail division in fourth quarter 2013 partially offset by the acquisition of Prime Professions in second quarter 2013.

52

Table of Contents

Business discussion

Willis Re reported mid single-digit organic commissions and fees growth, with its North America business leading the way with high single-digit results. New business was strong across all three divisions and we reported increased client retention levels compared to the prior year. Growth however was tempered by the negative impact of premium rate movements.
Willis Insurance UK reported a low single-digit decline, primarily due to poor performance in the Insolvency and Willis Commercial Network businesses, the non-recurrence of large construction projects in 2013 in the Construction, Property & Casualty business, and the negative impact from the acquisitions and disposals noted above.
Willis Capital Markets & Advisory performed solidly in the year and reported significant growth on last year as a result of significant new business wins.
Client retention levels improved to 92.6 percent for 2014, compared with 91.8 percent for 2013.
Other income of $15 million included a $12 million settlement related to a specialty book of business.
Expenses
Total operating expenses of $1,058 million were $70 million, or 7.1 percent, higher for 2014 compared with 2013. Excluding the $25 million, or 2.7 percent, impact of adverse foreign currency movements, total operating expenses increased $45 million or 4.4 percent.
The $45 million growth in expenses was due to higher salaries and benefits as a result of the increase in headcount relative to the prior year, annual salary reviews and higher incentives which were linked to commissions and fees performance. This increase was offset by the decline in Other operating expenses primarily due to lower allocation of corporate costs and an E&O provision release partially offset by a legal claim settlement and higher systems and premises costs.
In addition, the year-on-year growth included $11 million restructuring costs relating the Operational Improvement Program.
Operating margin

Full year operating margin was 25.0 percent in 2014 and 27.6 percent in 2013. The decline was driven by expense growth of 7.1 percent exceeding the 3.4 percent total revenue growth.
2013 compared to 2012
Revenues
Commissions and fees of $1,358 million were $55 million, or 4.2 percent, higher in 2013 compared with 2012. Foreign exchange movements had a net 0.9 percent negative impact on commissions and fees; organic growth was 4.3 percent.
The 4.3 percent organic growth in commissions and fees was driven by strong new business growth and higher client retention levels compared with the year ago period, partially offset by lost business. Rates had no material impact on commissions and fees.
Willis Re reported high single-digit growth, with North America leading the way with double-digit results. New business was strong across all three divisions and we reported increased client retention levels compared to the prior year.
Willis Insurance UK reported mid single-digit growth, with solid performance in our Financial and Executive Risk, and P&C and Construction. Growth from new business was solid and we saw increased client retention levels compared to 2012.
Willis Capital Markets & Advisory performed solidly but was down compared to the very strong result it recorded in 2012 relating to meaningfully higher volumes of advisory fees and catastrophe bond deals.
Operating margin

Operating margin was 27.6 percent in 2013 and 30.5 percent in 2012. The decline was driven additional expenses due to higher salaries and benefits, as a result of increased incentives from the change in remuneration policy and growth in commissions and fees. In addition, this increase also included the impact of the increase in headcount relative to the prior year, annual salary reviews and higher charges for share-based compensation. This was partially offset by solid commissions and fees growth.

53

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


North America
Our North America business provides risk management, insurance brokerage, related risk services and employee benefits brokerage and consulting to a wide array of industry and client segments in the United States, Canada and Mexico.
The following table sets out revenues, operating income, organic commissions and fees growth and operating margin for the three years ended December 31, 20132014 (in millions, except percentages):
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Commissions and fees (a)
$1,377
 $1,306
 $1,314
$1,365
 $1,349
 $1,281
Investment income2
 3
 7
1
 2
 3
Other income (b)
7
 4
 2
4
 7
 4
Total revenues$1,386
 $1,313
 $1,323
$1,370
 $1,358
 $1,288
Operating income$269
 $240
 $271
$273
 $249
 $252
Revenue growth5.6% (0.8)% (4.5)%0.9% 5.4% (0.5)%
Organic commissions and fees growth (c)
4.9% (0.6)% (3.5)%2.8% 4.8% (0.4)%
Operating margin19.4% 18.3 % 20.5 %19.9% 18.3% 19.6 %
_________________
(a) 
Commissions and fees in 2013 included a positive $5 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in the North America Personal Lines business with the rest of the Group.
(b) 
Other income comprises gains on disposal of intangible assets, which primarily arise from settlements through enforcing non-compete agreements in the event of losing accounts through producer defection or the disposal of books of business.
(c) 
Organic commissions and fees growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; and (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented.

20132014 compared to 20122013
Revenues
Commissions and fees of $1,3771,365 million were $7116 million, or 5.41.2 percent, higher in 20132014 compared with 2012.2013.
This increase was primarily due to organic growth of 4.92.8 percent partially offset by a 1.5 percent negative impact from acquisitions and disposals and a 0.1 percent negative impact from foreign currency movements.
The acquisitions and disposals impact was primarily due to the disposal of non-strategic low growth offices in the second and fourth quarters of 2014 partially offset by the acquisition of the employee benefits consulting division of Capital Strategies in fourth quarter 2013.
The 2.8 percent organic growth in commissions and fees was driven by strong new business growth compared with the year ago period, partially offset by lost business and the non-recurrence of a positive $5 million adjustment in 2013 to align the recognition of revenue in the North America Personal Lines business with the rest of the Group. Rates had a small negative impact on the full year's commissions and fees.
Growth was achieved across most of our North America regions, led by the South, Atlantic and Northeast regions as a result of new business growth.
Similarly, most of the major practice groups recorded positive growth. Our two largest practices, Human Capital and Construction, recorded mid single and low single-digit growth respectively. In our other practices we recorded double-digit growth in Mergers & Acquisitions, Financial & Executive Risks and Service Industry.
Client retention levels were 92.0 percent in 2014 compared with 92.1 percent in 2013.


54

Table of Contents

Business discussion

Expenses
Total operating expenses of $1,097 million were $12 million or 1.1 percent, lower for 2014 compared to 2013.
The $12 million reduction in expenses was due to lower incentives as a result of one-off adjustments, reduction to the amortization of intangible assets and the disposal of certain non-strategic low growth locations partially offset by higher salaries, due to annual salary reviews, and higher business development expenses.
In addition, full year 2014 operating expenses included $3 million restructuring costs relating to the Operational Improvement Program.
Operating margin

Operating margin in North America was 19.9 percent in 2014 compared with 18.3 percent in 2013 driven by solid commissions and fees growth.
2013 compared to 2012
Revenues
Commissions and fees of $1,349 million were $68 million, or 5.3 percent, higher in 2013 compared with 2012.
This increase was primarily due to organic growth of 4.8 percent in 2013 compared with 2012 and a 0.6 percent positive impact from the acquisition of Avalon Actuarial, Inc. in fourth quarter 2012, partially offset by a 0.1 percent negative impact from foreign currency movements.
Commissions and fees included a positive $5 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in the North America Personal Lines business with the rest of the Group.
The 4.94.8 percent organic growth in commissions and fees was driven by strong new business growth and higher client retention levels compared with the year ago period, partially offset by lost business. Rates had a small positive impact on the full year's commissions and fees.
Growth was achieved across all our North America regions, led by the Metro, Midwest, Canada and CAPPPS regions. This was attributed to new business growth as well as increased client retention rates in almost all regions.
Similarly, most of the major practice groups recorded positive growth. Our two largest practices, Human Capital and Construction, recorded mid single-digit growth and in our other practices we recorded high single-digit growth in Real Estate and low single-digit growth in Financial & Executive Risks, Healthcare and Manufacturing.
Client retention levels were 92.0Operating margin

Operating margin in North America was 18.3 percent in 2013 compared with 90.719.6 percent in 2012.

Expenses
Total operating Solid commissions and fees growth was outpaced by increased expenses, of $1,117 million were $44 million or 4.1 percent, higher for 2013 compared to 2012.
The year-on-year growth is primarily due todriven by higher salaries and benefits most notably as a result of annual salary reviews. SalariesSalary and benefits were also impacted by a higher incentives charge as a result of higher commissions and fees and the

53

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


change in remuneration policy, and additional 401(k) match and medical charges, partially offset by lower charges for share-based compensation and pensions.
In addition, there was an increase in other expenses due to a $6 million write-off of a receivable related to a non-E&O settlement, professional fees related to the strategic review of the segment, and higher travel and accommodation expense to support revenue growth and client retention, partially offset by a $4 million insurance premium accrual reversal.
Foreign currency movements had no material impact on expenses.
Operating margin

Operating margin in North America was 19.4 percent in 2013 compared with 18.3 percent in 2012 driven by solid commissions and fees growth.
2012 compared to 2011
Revenues
Commissions and fees of $1,306 million were $8 million, or 0.6 percent, lower in 2012 compared with 2011.
Organic commissions and fees growth declined 0.6 percent in 2012 compared with 2011, whilst new business levels were higher than in 2011, resulting in growth in certain regions and business segments. These were more than offset by lower Loan Protector revenues and the impact of the weakened economy.
The decline in the financial performance of our Loan Protector business had a 0.8 percent negative impact on North America organic growth in commissions and fees and negatively impacted the segment's revenue by $10 million. The Loan Protector decline was driven by the loss of clients through attrition and M&A activity, industry-wide commission pressures and a slowdown in business in its specialized market in the US in 2011.
Client retention levels were 90.7 percent in 2012 compared with 91.5 percent in 2011.
Operating margin

Operating margin in North America was 18.3 percent in 2012 compared with 20.5 percent in 2011, reflecting the adverse impact from the 0.6 percent decline in organic commissions and fees growth discussed above, a $4 million reduction in investment income due to declining yields, and increases to incentive expenses, production linked awards and share-based compensation. These were partly offset by a reduction to other expenses, including lower premises costs and a reduction in E&O provisions.

5455

Table of Contents

Business discussionWillis Group Holdings plc


International
Our International business comprisescomprised our retail operations in Western Europe, Central and Eastern Europe, the United Kingdom, Asia, Australasia, the Middle East, South Africa and Latin America. The services provided are focused according to the characteristics of each market and vary across offices, but generally include direct risk management and insurance brokerage and employee benefits consulting.
The following table sets out revenues, operating income, organic commissions and fees growth and operating margin for the three years ended December 31, 20132014 (in millions, except percentages):
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Commissions and fees (a)
$1,068
 $1,028
 $1,027
$1,016
 $926
 $874
Investment income10
 10
 15
6
 7
 8
Total revenues$1,078
 $1,038
 $1,042
$1,022
 $933
 $882
Operating income181
 183
 221
197
 178
 167
Revenue growth3.9% (0.4)% 9.6%9.5% 5.8% 0.1%
Organic commissions and fees growth (b)
4.1% 4.9 % 4.8%9.0% 5.8% 6.3%
Operating margin16.8% 17.6 % 21.2%19.3% 19.1% 18.9%
________________
(a) 
Commissions and fees in 2013 included a negative $15 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in China with the rest of the Group.
(b) 
Organic commissions and fees growth excludes: (i) the impact of foreign currency translation; (ii) the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions; and (iii) the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each period presented.

20132014 compared to 20122013
Revenues
Commissions and fees of $1,0681,016 million were $4090 million, or 3.99.7 percent, higher in 20132014 compared with 2012. 2013.
Organic commissions and fees growth was 4.19.0 percent and there was a 5.8 percent positive impact from the acquisition of Charles Monat in second quarter 2014, and Max Matthiessen in fourth quarter 2014. This was partially offset by a 0.25.1 percent negative impact from foreign currency movements.movements which was driven by the weakening of a basket of currencies versus the US dollar.
Organic growth included double-digit new business growth and a positive impact from rates, partly offset by lost business. Growth was positively impacted by the non-recurrence of an adjustment recorded in 2013 to align the recognition of revenue in China with the rest of the Group.
Western Europe reported mid single-digit growth driven by Iberia, Germany and Ireland.
Latin America reported double-digit growth arising primarily from Brazil and Venezuela which was partially offset by decline in Colombia.
Organic double digit growth in Asia was primarily due to the non-recurrence of an adjustment recorded in 2013 to align the recognition of revenue in China with the rest of the Group.
Eastern Europe reported low double digit growth arising primarily from Russia and Poland.
Client retention rates were largely flat at 93.7 percent for 2014 compared to 93.2 percent for 2013.
Expenses

Total expenses of $825 million were $70 million, or 9.3 percent, higher for 2014 compared with 2013. Foreign currency movements favorably impacted expenses by $22 million or 3.3 percent; excluding the impact of foreign currency movements total expenses increased $92 million or 12.6 percent.
The $92 million increase in total expenses included $44 million year-over-year net increase from acquisitions, increased growth in Salaries and benefits due to higher headcount numbers relative to the prior year, and pay reviews which included the mandated pay reviews in Latin America. The segment also reported an increase in travel, accommodation and entertaining,

56

Table of Contents

Business discussion

professional fees and irrecoverable VAT. This was partially offset by the $3 million gain on disposal of fixed assets and an E&O provision release.
The amortization of intangible assets increased following the acquisition of Charles Monat and Max Matthiessen.
In addition, the year-on-year growth included $5 million restructuring costs relating the Operational Improvement Program.
Operating margin

Operating margin in International was 19.3 percent in 2014, compared with 19.1 percent in 2013. The increase was driven by the increase in expenses discussed above partially offset by solid commissions and fees growth.
2013 compared to 2012
Revenues
Commissions and fees of $926 million were $52 million, or 5.9 percent, higher in 2013 compared with 2012. This comprised organic commissions and fees growth of 5.8 percent and positive foreign exchange movements of 0.1 percent. Organic growth included double digit new business growth, partly offset by slight increases to lost business. Rates had no significant impact on commissions and fees.fees in the year.
Commissions and fees included the negative impact of a $15 million adjustment to align the recognition of revenue in China with the rest of the Group.
Latin America reported double-digit growth arising primarily from Brazil and Venezuela which was partially offset by a double-digit decline in Colombia.
Asia reported low-single digit growth. We recorded good growth throughout the region especially in Hong Kong and Korea, however the negative $15 million revenue recognition adjustment partially offset these results.
Eastern Europe reported high single-digit growth arising primarily from Russia tempered by a mid-single digit decline in Poland.
Western Europe reported low single-digit growth. Despite difficult economic conditions, Italy and Iberia produced mid-single digit growth partially offset by mid single-digit declines in Ireland and the Netherlands.
The UK reported a low single-digit decline amid a challenging economic environment.
Client retention rates were largely flat at 93.1 percent for 2013 compared to 93.3 percent for 2012.
ExpensesOperating margin

Total operating expenses of $897 million were $42 million, or 4.9Operating margin in International was 19.1 percent, higher for in 2013, compared with 18.9 percent in 2012. Foreign currency movements favorably impacted operating expenses by $12 million or 1.4 percent; excluding the impact of foreign currency movements total operating expenses increased $54 million or 6.3 percent.

55

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


ThisThe increase was due primarily todriven by solid commission and fees growth, partially offset by expense growth driven by higher salaries and benefits, as a result of new hires, annual salary reviews, higher incentives due to the change in remuneration policy, and an increased charge for share-based compensation.
In addition to this, we incurred professional fees related to the strategic review of the segment, higher travel and accommodation expense to support business development, and a $5 million VAT related charge. These charges were partially offset by a reduced bad debt expense and non-recurring 2012 legal claims settlements.
Operating margin

Operating margin in International was 16.8 percent in 2013, compared with 17.6 percent in 2012. The decline was driven by the increase in expenses discussed above partially offset by solid commissions and fees growth.
2012 compared to 2011
Revenues
Commissions and fees of $1,028 million were $1 million, or 0.1 percent, higher in 2012 compared with 2011. Organic commissions and fees growth of 4.9 percent was partially offset by negative foreign exchange movements of 4.8 percent. Organic growth included double digit new business growth, partly offset by slight increases to lost business. Rates and other market factors had no significant impact on commissions and fees in the year.
Despite the ongoing economic difficulties faced by the Eurozone, our large retail operations in the region delivered low single-digit growth in 2012, driven by strong growth in Germany, Sweden and Denmark, although this growth was partially offset by declines in Ireland and Norway.
Our Latin American operation delivered high double-digit growth in 2012, the result of significant new business growth; principally in Brazil, Venezuela and Argentina.
Asia reported high single-digit growth in 2012 led by strong growth in Japan, China and Korea.
Organic growth in our UK retail operation was flat in 2012, compared with 2011, this reflects a stabilization of the business in the region following a 2.3 percent decline in 2011.

A significant part of International's revenues are earned in currencies other than the US dollar, most notably the euro and the Australian dollar. The net 4.8 percent negative impact from foreign currency translation in 2012 primarily reflected the weakening of the US dollar against these and other currencies in which we earn International revenues.

Client retention levels decreased to 93.3 percent for 2012, compared with 93.7 percent for 2011.
Operating margin

Operating margin in International was 17.6 percent in 2012, compared with 21.2 percent in 2011. The decrease primarily reflected significant increases in salaries and benefits as a result of new hires supporting growth in targeted geographies, annual pay increases, the negative impact of foreign exchange on revenues and increases to certain provisions including bad debts. These were partly offset by the benefit from organic commissions and fees discussed above.

5657

Table of Contents

Business discussionWillis Group Holdings plc


Corporate and Other
The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on organic commissions and fees growth and operating income. For internal reporting and segmental reporting, items for which segmental management are not held responsible for are held within ‘Corporate and Other’.
Corporate and Other comprises the following (in millions):
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
          
Amortization of intangible assets$(55) $(59) $(68)
Costs of the holding company$(13) $(10) $(4)
Costs related to group functions, projects and leadership(194) (118) (114)
Non-servicing elements of defined benefit pension scheme53
 42
 38
Significant legal and regulatory settlements managed centrally(2) (6) (6)
Operational Improvement Program(17) 
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy (a)

 (252) 

 
 (252)
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards (b)

 (200) 

 
 (200)
Goodwill impairment charge (c)

 (492) 

 
 (492)
India joint venture settlement (d)

 (11) 

 
 (11)
Insurance recovery (e)

 10
 

 
 10
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance in Chicago (f)

 (13) (22)
 
 (13)
Net gain (loss) on disposal of operations (d)
2
 (3) 4
Foreign exchange hedging3
 8
 5
Foreign exchange gain (loss) on the UK pension plan asset8
 (1) 
2011 Operational Review
 
 (180)
FSA Regulatory settlement
 
 (11)
Expense Reduction Initiative(46) 
 

 (46) 
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt(1) 
 

 (1) 
Other (g)
(10) 9
 (6)
Other(2) (1) 
Total Corporate and other$(99) $(1,004) $(278)$(175) $(140) $(1,044)
_________________
________________
(a) 
Additional incentive accrual recognized following the replacement of annual cash retention awards with annual cash bonuses which do not feature a repayment requirement.
(b) 
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards following the decision to eliminate the repayment requirement on past awards.
(c) 
Non-cash charge recognized related to the impairment of the carrying value of the North America reporting unit's goodwill.
(d) 
$11 million settlement with former partners related to the termination of a joint venture arrangement in India. In addition, a $1 million loss on disposal of operations was recorded related to the termination.
(e) 
Insurance recovery, recorded in Other operating expenses, related to a previously disclosed fraudulent activity in Chicago. See 'Correction of Commissions and Fees Overstatement Relating to 2011 and Prior Periods' discussed above.
(f) 
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance relating to periods prior to January 1, 2011, see 'Correction of Commissions and Fees Overstatement Relating to 2011 and Prior Periods' discussed above.
(g)
Other includes $7 million in 2013 (2012: $7 million, 2011: $12 million) from the release of funds and reserves related to potential legal liabilities.
2011.

2014 compared to 2013

Expenses
Corporate and Other expenses of $175 million were $35 million higher in 2014 compared with 2013.
The $35 million growth included a $69 million increase due to higher costs of group functions including projects, leadership and increased professional fees and the adverse impact of changes to the methodology used to allocate Corporate function costs to Global, North America and International. In addition to this, Corporate recognized $17 million of restructuring costs related to the Operational Improvement Program.
These increases were partially offset by the 2013 Expense Reduction Initiative costs of $46 million, $1 million of fees related to the extinguishment of debt and $4 million of favorable foreign exchange movements.




5758

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

Business discussion

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Management considers that the following accounting estimates or assumptions are the most important to the presentation of our financial condition or operating performance:
pension expense (discount rates, expected asset returns and mortality);
intangible assets and goodwill impairment (determination of reporting units, fair value of reporting units and annual goodwill impairment analysis);
income taxes; and
commitments, contingencies and accrued liabilities.
Management has discussed its critical accounting estimates and associated disclosures with our Audit Committee.
Pension expense
We maintain defined benefit pension plans for employees in the US and UK. Both of these plans are now closed to new entrants and, with effect from May 15, 2009 we closed our US defined benefit plan to future accrual. New employees in the UK are offered the opportunity to join a defined contribution plan and in the US are offered the opportunity to join a 401(k) plan. We also have smaller defined benefit plans in Ireland, Germany, Norway and the Netherlands, a non-qualified plan in the US and an unfunded plan in the UK. These smaller defined benefit plans have combined total assets of $168$171 million and a combined net liability for pension benefits of $27$39 million as of December 31, 20132014. Elsewhere, pension benefits are typically provided through defined contribution plans.
We recorded a $513 million and a $4an $8 million net periodic benefit income on our UK and US defined benefit pension schemeschemes respectively in 20132014, compared with a net periodic benefit income of $5 million on the UK scheme and a net periodic benefit costincome of $3$4 million on the US scheme in 20122013. On our international defined benefit pension plans, US non-qualified plan and UK unfunded plan, we recorded a net periodic benefit cost of $4 million in 2014, compared with $5 million in 2013, compared with $4 million in 2012.
Based on December 31, 20132014 assumptions, (except for one update - the expected rate of return in the UK pension plan changed from 7.25% to 7.00%), we expect the net pension credit in 20142015 will increase $7$31 million for the UK plan. The net pension credit will increasedecrease by $4$2 million for the US plan and the net pension charge will decrease by $1remain unchanged at $4 million for the other plans.
We make a number of assumptions when determining our pension liabilities and pension expense which are reviewed annually by senior management and changed where appropriate. The discount rate will be changed annually if underlying rates have moved whereas the expected long-term return on assets will be changed less frequently as longer term trends in asset returns emerge or long term target asset allocations are revised. Other material assumptions include rates of participant mortality, the expected long-term rate of compensation and pension increases and rates of employee termination. Our approach to determining appropriate assumptions for our UK and US pension plans is set out below.
UK plan
 
As disclosed
using
December 31,
2013
assumptions(a)
 
Impact of a
0.50 percentage
point increase
in the expected
rate of return
on assets(b)
 
Impact of a
0.50 percentage
point increase
in the discount
rate(b)
 
One year
increase in
mortality
assumption(c)
 (millions)
Estimated 2014 (income) / expense$(12) $(15) $(24) $8
Projected benefit obligation at December 31, 20132,785
 n/a
 (254) 56
 
As disclosed
using
December 31,
2014
assumptions
 
Impact of a
0.50 percentage
point increase
in the expected
rate of return
on assets(a)
 
Impact of a
0.50 percentage
point increase
in the discount
rate(a)
 
One year
increase in
mortality
assumption(b)
 (millions)
Estimated 2015 (income) / expense$(44) $(17) $(25) $8
Projected benefit obligation at December 31, 20143,084
 n/a
 (282) 62
_________________
(a)
Except for the expected rate of return updated to 7%.
(b) 
With all other assumptions held constant.
(c)(b) 
Assumes all plan participants are one year younger.

5859

Table of Contents

Business discussionWillis Group Holdings plc


Discount rate
During 20132014 we continued to use a duration-based approach, which more closely matches the actual timing of expected cash flows to the applicable discount rate. The selected rate used to discount UK plan liabilities in 20132014 was 4.40%3.60% consistent witha decrease of 80 basis points from the discount rate of 4.40% used at December 31, 20122013. During 2013,2014, sterling high-quality corporate bond yields had risen slightlyfell significantly at shorter to median durations but fallen at longer durations however,all durations. Consequently, the rate consistent with the expected maturity of the plan's liabilities was unchanged.has also decreased.
Expected and actual asset returns
Expected long-term rates of return on plan assets are developed from the expected future returns of the various asset classes using the target asset allocations. The expected long-term rate of return used for determining the net UK pension expense in 20132014 was 7.25%7.00% (20122013: 7.50%7.25%), equivalent to an expected return in 20132014 of $191$213 million (20122013: $181$191 million). Effective January 1, 2014,There have been no further changes to the expectedstrategic target asset allocation therefore, management considers that 7.00% continues to be an appropriate long-term rate of return was decreased to 7.00%. The decrease in the expected long-term rate of return followed a change in the underlying target asset mix, which reflects the actions taken during 2013 in accordance with the de-risking strategy proposed by the Trustees which will lead to a strategic target asset allocation with a greater weighting to non-return seeking assets.assumption.
The expected and actual returns on UK plan assets for the three years ended December 31, 20132014 were as follows:
Expected
return on
plan assets
 
Actual
return
on plan
assets
Expected
return on
plan assets
 
Actual
return
on plan
assets
(millions)(millions)
2014$213
 $520
2013$191
 $255
191
 255
2012181
 226
181
 226
2011161
 269
Mortality
The mortality assumption chosen should reflect the long term life expectancy of pension scheme members and represent the best estimate assumptions used during 2013 isas opposed to more prudent assumption used by pension scheme trustees for funding purposes.
At December 31, 2014 we have updated the 90/105% PNA00 tablemortality base tables to use the more recent 80%/98% S1NA tables for malesmale and females however, we have adjusted the base tables to reflect our scheme experiences and is unchanged fromconsequently the assumptions used during 2012.liabilities are broadly unchanged.
As an indication of the longevity assumed, our calculations assume that a UK male retiree aged 65 at December 31, 20132014 would have a life expectancy of 24 years.
US plan
 
As disclosed
using
December 31, 2013
assumptions
 
Impact of a
0.50 percentage
point increase
in the expected
rate of return
on assets(a)
 
Impact of a
0.50 percentage
point increase
in the discount
rate(a)
 
One year
increase in
mortality
assumption(b)
 (millions)
Estimated 2014 (income) / expense$(8) $(4) $
 $2
Projected benefit obligation at December 31, 2013864
 n/a
 (51) 22
 
As disclosed
using
December 31, 2013
assumptions
 
Impact of a
0.50 percentage
point increase
in the expected
rate of return
on assets(a)
 
Impact of a
0.50 percentage
point increase
in the discount
rate(a)
 
One year
increase in
mortality
assumption(b)
 (millions)
Estimated 2015 (income) / expense$(6) $(4) $
 $1
Projected benefit obligation at December 31, 20141,051
 n/a
 (69) 14
_________________
(a) 
With all other assumptions held constant.
(b) 
Assumes all plan participants are one year younger.
Discount rate
The discount rate at December 31, 20132014 was 4.76%3.90%, an increasedecrease of 6986 basis points from the discount rate of 4.07%4.76% at December 31, 20122013. The increasedecrease in the discount rate reflects the increasedecrease in high-quality corporate bond yields during 2013.2014.
The impact of the higherlower discount rate in 20132014 decreasedincreased the projected benefit obligation by approximately $86$103 million.

5960

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

Business discussion

Expected and actual asset returns
The expected long-term rate of return used for determining the net US pension scheme expense in 20132014 was 7.25% (2012:(2013: 7.25%)
The expected and actual returns on US plan assets for the three years ended December 31, 20132014 were as follows:
Expected
return on
plan assets
 
Actual
return
on plan
assets
Expected
return on
plan assets
 
Actual
return
on plan
assets
(millions)(millions)
2014$54
 $65
2013$51
 $60
51
 60
201246
 80
46
 80
201144
 34
Mortality
TheDuring 2014, the US Society of Actuaries released updated mortality assumptiontables to reflect improvements in longevity reflecting the results of their multi-year mortality study of participants in uninsured pension plans in the US. They also published details of mortality improvements. In summary, these tables showed that people are living longer, especially at older ages.
Consequently, in line with market practice, we have adopted at December 31, 2013 is2014 the RP 2014 Mortality Table projected using MP-2014 improvements scale on a fully generational basis (December 31, 2013: RP-2000 Mortality Table (blended for annuitants and non-annuitants), projected by Scale AA to 2021 for annuitants and 2029 for non-annuitants (December 31, 2012: RP-2000 Mortality Table (blended for annuitants and non-annuitants),.
The impact of this change increase the projected benefit obligation by Scale AA to 2020 for annuitants and 2028 for non-annuitants).approximately $80 million.
As an indication of the longevity assumed, our calculations assume that a US male retiree aged 65 at December 31, 20132014, would have a life expectancy of 1922 years.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets represent the excess of cost over the value of net tangible assets of businesses acquired. We classify our intangible assets into three categories;
Goodwill;
‘Customer and Marketing Related’ which includes client lists, client relationships, trade names and non-compete agreements; and
‘Contract-based, Technology and Other’ which includes all other purchased intangible assets.
Client relationships acquired on the HRH acquisition are amortized over twenty years in line with the pattern in which the economic benefits of the client relationships are expected to be consumed. Over 80% of the client relationships intangible will have been amortized after 10 years. Non-compete agreements acquired in connection with the HRH acquisition were amortized over two years on a straight line basis. Intangible assets acquired in connection with other acquisitions are amortized over their estimated useful lives on a straight line basis. Goodwill is not subject to amortization.
We review purchased intangible assets with finite lives for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these intangible assets is assessed based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the continued use of the asset. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount, the purchased intangible assets with finite lives are considered to be impaired. The amount of the impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value.
Goodwill impairment review
We test goodwill for impairment annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred.
The goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis. Step One requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its carrying value. If the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit, goodwill is not considered impaired and no further testing is necessary. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value, we perform Step Two. Step Two requires the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill to be compared with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Determining the implied fair value of goodwill requires a valuation of the reporting unit’s tangible and intangible assets and liabilities in a manner similar to the allocation of the purchase price in a business combination. Any excess of the value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is referred to as the implied fair value of goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

60

Table of Contents

Business discussion

Application of the impairment test involves the use of discounted cash flow models and requires significant judgment, including including:
the identification of reporting units, units;
projections of commission and fee and expense growth rates;
discount and terminal growth rates;
assignment of assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting unitsunits; and
determination of fair value of each reporting unit.
Determination of reporting units
We have determineduse comparable market earnings multiple data and our Company's market capitalization to corroborate our reporting units to be consistent with our operating segments: North America; International and Global. Goodwill is allocated to these reporting units based on the original purchase price allocation for acquisitions within the reporting units.
Fair value of reporting units
The fair value of each reporting unit is estimated using a discounted cash flow methodology and, in aggregate, validated against our market capitalization.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include estimations of future cash flows which are dependent on internal forecasts, long-term rate of growth for our business and determination of our weighted average cost of capital.
We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Therefore changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and result in goodwill impairment.
In addition, we make certain judgments and assumptions in allocating shared assets and liabilities to determine the carrying values for each of our reporting units.
Annual goodwill impairment analysisvaluations.
Our annual goodwill impairment analysis is performed each year at October 1. At October 1, 20132014 our analysis showed the estimate fair value of each reporting unit was significantly in excess of carrying value, and therefore did not result in an impairment charge.
The goodwill impairment analysis as of October 1, 2012 concluded that an impairment charge was required to reduce the carrying value of the goodwill associated with the Company's North America reporting unit. The goodwill impairment charge for the North America reporting unit amounted to(2013: $nil; 2012: $492 million. There was no impairment for the Global and International reporting units, as the fair values of these units were significantly in excess of their carrying value.
Under the income approach, the fair value of the North America reporting unit was determined based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. The fair value measurements used unobservable inputs in a discounted cash flow model based on the Company's most recent forecasts. Such projections were based on management's estimates of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions, and the uncertainty related to the reporting unit's ability to execute on the projected cash flows with consideration of market comparables where appropriate. The discount rate was based on the weighted-average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with market participant expectations of characteristics of the individual reporting units.
As the fair value of the reporting unit was less than its carrying value, the second step of the impairment test was performed to measure the amount of any impairment loss. In the second step, the North America reporting unit's fair value was allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including any unrecognized intangible assets. The fair value of intangible assets associated with the North America reporting unit included customer relationship intangible assets, which were valued using a multiple period excess earnings approach involving discounted future projections of associated revenue streams.
The decline in the fair value of the North America reporting unit, as well as differences between fair values and carrying values for other assets and liabilities in the second step of the goodwill impairment test, resulted in an implied fair value of goodwill substantially below the carrying value of the goodwill for the reporting unit. As a result, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $492 million in 2012.
As previously disclosed, the North America reporting unit had been hampered by the declining Loan Protector business results, the effect of the soft economy in the U.S., which had significantly impacted the Construction and Human Capital sectors, and declining retention rates primarily related to M&A activity and lost legacy HRH business.
The decline in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit resulted from lower projected revenue growth rates and profitability levels as well as an increase in the discount rate used to calculate the discounted cash flows. The increase in the discount rate was due to increases in the risk-free rate and small company premium offset by a reduction to the expected market rate of

61

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


return. The lower projected profitability levels reflect changes in assumptions related to organic revenue growth and cost rates which can be attributed to the declines discussed above and also includes consideration of the uncertainty related to the business's ability to execute on the projected cash flows.million).
Income taxes
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax consequences of events attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating and capital loss and tax credit carry-forwards. We estimate deferred tax assets and liabilities and assess the need for any valuation allowances using tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to be recovered or settled taking into account our business plans and tax planning strategies.

61

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


At December 31, 20132014, we had gross deferred tax assets of $383426 million (20122013: $451383 million) against which a valuation allowance of $196280 million (20122013: $221196 million) had been recognized. To the extent that:
the actual future taxable income in the periods during which the temporary differences are expected to reverse differs from current projections;
assumed prudent and feasible tax planning strategies fail to materialize;
new tax planning strategies are developed; or
material changes occur in actual tax rates or loss carry-forward time limits,
we may adjust the deferred tax asset considered realizable in future periods. Such adjustments could result in a significant increase or decrease in the effective tax rate and have a material impact on our net income.
Considering our recent US earnings experience and projections of future income, a possibility exists that we may release a portion of the valuation allowance against our US deferred tax assets in the next twelve months. Release of the US valuation allowance would result in the recognition of deferred tax assets and a decrease to income tax expense for the period the release is recorded. Our US valuation allowance, excluding that related to state separate taxes, is $160 million as at December 31, 2014. The exact timing and amount of future valuation release is subject to change on the basis of the level of profitability we are able to achieve.
Positions taken in our tax returns may be subject to challenge by the taxing authorities upon examination. We recognize the benefit of uncertain tax positions in the financial statements when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on examination by the tax authorities. The benefit recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized on settlement with the tax authority, assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.
The Company adjusts its recognition of these uncertain tax benefits in the period in which new information is available impacting either the recognition or measurement of its uncertain tax positions. In 20132014, there was a net increasedecrease in uncertain tax positions of $4$22 million compared to a net increase of $21$4 million in 20122013. The Company recognizes interest relating to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties within income taxes. Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability line in the consolidated balance sheet.
Commitments, contingencies and accrued liabilities
We purchase professional indemnity insurance for errors and omissions claims. The terms of this insurance vary by policy year and self-insured risks have increased significantly over recent years. We have established provisions against various actual and potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings relating principally to alleged errors and omissions in connection with the placement of insurance and reinsurance in the ordinary course of business. Such provisions cover claims that have been reported but not paid and also claims that have been incurred but not reported. These provisions are established based on actuarial estimates together with individual case reviews and are believed to be adequate in the light of current information and legal advice.

62


Business discussion

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The Company’s contractual obligations as at December 31, 20132014 are presented below:
Payments due byPayments due by
Obligations (c)
Total 2014 2015-2016 2017-2018 After 2018Total 2015 2016-2017 2018-2019 After 2019
(millions)(millions)
7-year term loan facility expires 2018$274
 $15
 $39
 $220
 $
$259
 $17
 $45
 $197
 $
Interest on term loan19
 5
 9
 5
 
14
 4
 8
 2
 
Revolving $500 million credit facility commitment fees9
 2
 4
 3
 
Revolving $800 million credit facility commitment fees7
 2
 4
 1
 
Revolving $400 million credit facility commitment fees2
 1
 1
 
 
5.625% senior notes due 2015148
 
 148
 
 
148
 148
 
 
 
Fair value adjustments on 5.625% senior notes due 20154
 
 4
 
 
4.125% senior notes due 2016300
 
 300
 
 
300
 
 300
 
 
6.200% senior notes due 2017394
 
 
 394
 
394
 
 394
 
 
7.000% senior notes due 2019187
 
 
 
 187
187
 
 
 187
 
5.750% senior notes due 2021500
 
 
 
 500
500
 
 
 
 500
4.625% senior notes due 2023250
 
 
 
 250
250
 
 
 
 250
6.125% senior notes due 2043275
 
 
 
 275
275
 
 
 
 275
Interest on senior notes1,011
 115
 209
 146
 541
896
 112
 173
 137
 474
Total debt and related interest3,371
 137
 713
 768
 1,753
3,232
 284
 925
 524
 1,499
Operating leases (a)
1,235
 131
 213
 167
 724
1,181
 128
 221
 175
 657
Pensions566
 122
 244
 161
 39
346
 116
 190
 40
 
Other contractual obligations (b)
91
 24
 16
 12
 39
143
 10
 40
 43
 50
Acquisition liabilities50
 8
 26
 16
 
Total contractual obligations$5,263
 $414
 $1,186
 $1,108
 $2,555
$4,952
 $546
 $1,402
 $798
 $2,206
__________________
(a) 
Presented gross of sublease income.
(b) 
Other contractual obligations include capital lease commitments, put option obligations and investment fund capital call obligations, the timing of which are included at the earliest point they may fall due.
(c) 
The above excludes $41$19 million for liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits as we are unable to reasonably predict the timing of settlement of these liabilities.
Debt obligations and facilities
The Company’s debt and related interest obligations at December 31, 20132014 are shown in the above table.
On July 23, 2013 we entered into an amendment to our existing credit facilities to extend the amount of financing of the facilities. As a result of this amendment, our revolving credit facility was increased from $500 million to $800 million. As at December 31, 20132014 $nil was outstanding under theour revolving credit facility.facilities.
This facility is in addition to the remaining availability of $22 million under the Company’s two other previously existing revolving credit facilities.
The only mandatoryMandatory repayments of debt over the next 12 months areinclude expiration of the 3-year term loan facility expiring 2015, maturity of the 5.625% senior notes due 2015 and the scheduled repayment of $15 millionthe current portion of the Company’s 7-year term loan. WeThe Company also havehas the right, at ourits option, to prepay indebtedness under the credit facility without further penalty and to redeem the senior notes at our option by paying a ‘make-whole’ premium as provided under the applicable debt instrument.

Operating leases
The Company leases certain land, buildings and equipment under various operating lease arrangements. Original non-cancellable lease terms typically are between 10 and 20 years and may contain escalation clauses, along with options that permit early withdrawal. The total amount of the minimum rent is expensed on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
Information regarding these operating leases and their impact on the financial statements is set forth in Note 20 - ‘Commitments and Contingencies’ to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing under Part II, Item 8 of this report and incorporated herein by reference.


63


Willis Group Holdings plc


As of December 31, 2013, the aggregate future minimum rental commitments under all non-cancellable operating lease agreements are as follows:
 
Gross rental
commitments
 
Rentals from
subleases
 
Net rental
commitments
 (millions)
2014$131
 $(15) $116
2015114
 (14) 100
201699
 (13) 86
201788
 (12) 76
201879
 (8) 71
Thereafter724
 (16) 708
Total$1,235
 $(78) $1,157
The Company leases its main London building under a 25-year operating lease, which expires in 2032. The Company’s contractual obligations in relation to this commitment included in the table above total $719 million (2012: $730 million). Annual rentals are $36 million (2012: $32 million) per year and the Company has subleased approximately 29 percent (2012: 29 percent) of the premises under leases up to 15 years. The amounts receivable from subleases, included in the table above, total $66 million (2012: $76 million; 2011: $82 million).
Rent expense amounted to $141 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 (2012: $135 million; 2011: $127 million). The Company’s rental income from subleases was $15 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 (2012: $17 million; 2011: $18 million).
Pensions
Contractual obligations for our pension plans reflect the contributions we expect to make over the next five years into our US, UK and UK,Other defined benefit plans. These contributions are based on current funding positions and may increase or decrease dependent on the future performance of the two plans.
Total contributions made in 2014 and 2013, and the contributions we expect to make in 2015, in respect of our UK, plan
During 2013, the Company made cash contributions to the UKUS and Other defined benefit pension plan of $88schemes are as follows:
 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Defined benefit pension plans:Expected Actual Actual
UK 
$96
 $81
 $88
US10
 20
 40
Other10
 11
 10
Total$116
 $112
 $138
Additionally, during 2014 $10 million (2012: $80 million; 2011: $81(2013: $12 million), additionally $12 million (2012: $12 million; 2011: $11 million) was paid into the UK plan in respect of employees' salary sacrifice contributions.
UK plan
In March 2012, the Company agreed to a revised schedule of contributions towards on-going accrual of benefits and deficit funding contributions the Company will make to the UK plan over the six years ended December 31, 2017. ContributionsBased on this agreement, contributions in each of the next fourthree years are expected towould total approximately $83$75 million, of which approximately $23$19 million relates to on-going contributions calculated as 15.9 percent of active plan members' pensionable salary and approximately $60$56 million that relates to contributions towards the funding deficit.
In addition, based on this agreement, further contributions willwould be payable based on a profit share calculation (equal to 20 percent of EBITDA in excess of $900 million per annum as defined by the revised schedule of contributions) and an exceptional return calculation (equal to 10 percent of any exceptional returns made to shareholders, for example, share buybacks, and special dividends). Upon finalizationWe expect to make an exceptional return contribution of these calculations the Company made$21 million during 2015 as a further contribution in 2013result of $10 million, calculated as 10 percent of the $100 million share buy-back program completedbuyback activity during 2012.2014. Aggregate contributions under the deficit funding contribution and the profit share calculation are capped at £312 million ($517486 million) over the six years ended December 31, 2017.
The schedule of contributions is automatically renegotiated after three years and at any earlier time jointly agreed by the Company and the Trustee. During 2014 we will be required to negotiateWe are currently negotiating a new funding arrangement, which we are required to do every three years, which may further change the contributions we are required to make in the future.
US planGuarantees and Other Contractual Obligations
We made total cash contributionsInformation regarding guarantees and other contractual obligations and their impact on the financial statements is set forth in Note 20 - ‘Commitments and Contingencies’ to our US defined benefit pension planthe Consolidated Financial Statements appearing under Part II, Item 8 of $40 million in 2013, compared with $40 million in 2012this report and $30 million in 2011.incorporated herein by reference.


64


Business discussion

We expect to make contributions of approximately $30 million in 2014 through 2019.
Other defined benefit pension plans
We made total cash contributions to our other defined benefit pension plans of $10 million in 2013, compared with $11 million in 2012 and 13 million in 2011.
In 2014, we expect to contribute approximately $9 million to our international plans.
The final 2014 contribution for all plans is expected to be approximately $122 million, excluding salary sacrifice which compares to an equivalent 2013 total contribution of $138 million.
Guarantees
Guarantees issued by certain of Willis Group Holdings’ subsidiaries with respect to the senior notes and revolving credit facilities are discussed in Note 20 — 'Debt' in these consolidated financial statements.
Certain of Willis Group Holdings’ subsidiaries have given the landlords of some leasehold properties occupied by the Company in the United Kingdom and the United States guarantees in respect of the performance of the lease obligations of the subsidiary holding the lease. The operating lease obligations subject to such guarantees amounted to $828 million and $829 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The capital lease obligations subject to such guarantees amounted to $11 million as at December 31, 2013 (2012: $nil).
In addition, the Company has given guarantees to bankers and other third parties relating principally to letters of credit amounting to $11 million and $10 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Willis Group Holdings also guarantees certain of its UK and Irish subsidiaries’ obligations to fund the UK and Irish defined benefit plans.
Other Contractual Obligations
For certain subsidiaries and associates, the Company has the right to purchase shares (a call option) from co-shareholders at various dates in the future. In addition, the co-shareholders of certain subsidiaries and associates have the right to sell their shares (a put option) to the Company at various dates in the future. Generally, the exercise price of such put options and call options is formula-based (using revenues and earnings) and is designed to reflect fair value. Based on current projections of profitability and exchange rates and assuming the put options are exercised, the potential amount payable from these options is not expected to exceed $12 million (2012: $19 million).
In July 2010, the Company made a capital commitment of $25 million to Trident V Parallel Fund, LP, an investment fund managed by Stone Point Capital. This replaced a capital commitment of $25 million that had been made to Trident V, LP in December 2009. As at December 31, 2013 there have been approximately $15 million of capital contributions.
In May 2011, the Company made a capital commitment of $10 million to Dowling Capital Partners I, LP. As at December 31, 2013 there have been approximately $4 million of capital contributions.
Other contractual obligations at December 31, 2013, also include certain capital lease obligations totaling $63 million (2012: $53 million), primarily in respect of the Company's Nashville property.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Other Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income to revise the manner in which entities present comprehensive income inInformation regarding new accounting standards and their financial statements. These changes require that components of comprehensive income be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income.This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and has been applied retrospectively.

65


Willis Group Holdings plc


ASU No. 2011-05 also requires entities to presentimpact on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net incomeis set forth in the statement(s) where the componentsNote 2 - ‘Basis of net incomePresentation and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12 in order to defer those changes in ASU No. 2011-05 that relateSignificant Accounting Policies’ to the presentationConsolidated Financial Statements appearing under Part II, Item 8 of reclassification adjustments. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive (ASU 2013-02). This guidance is the culmination of the FASB's deliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income but do require disclosure of amounts reclassified out of AOCI in its entirety,this report and incorporated herein by component, on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross-referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012 and has been applied retrospectively.reference.

Presentation of Unrecognized Tax Benefits
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. The ASU does not affect the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positions under US GAAP.
However, under the ASU, unrecognized tax benefits, or portions of unrecognised tax benefits, must be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to deferred tax assets when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward exists except when:
a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryfoward is not available at the reporting date under the governing tax laws to settle taxes that would result from the disallowance of the tax position; or
the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for this purpose, provided that the tax law permits a choice.

If either of these conditions exists, an entity should present an unrecognized tax benefit in the financial statements as a liability and should not net the unrecognized tax benefit with a deferred tax asset.
The amendments under the ASU:
are effective prospectively for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2013 although early adoption is permitted; and
should be applied to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist as of the effective date although entities may choose to apply the amendments retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented.

The Company has decided to not adopt this guidance early. However, as an indication of the likely balance sheet reclassification based on the position at December 31, 2013, the Company had recognized $22 million of unrecognized tax benefits within Other non-current liabilities that would be reclassified to Non-current deferred tax assets. The Company has not yet determined whether it will apply the amendments to the prior reporting period for its first quarter 2014 reporting.
Other than the changes described above, there were no new accounting standards issued during 2013 that would impact on the Company’s reporting.
OFF BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTIONS
Apart from commitments, guarantees and contingencies, as disclosed in Note 2220 - ‘Commitments and Contingencies’ to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing under Part II, Item 8 of this report and incorporated herein by reference, the Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

66


Market risk

Item 7A —Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Financial Risk Management
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. In order to manage the risk arising from these exposures, we enter into a variety of interest rate and foreign currency derivatives. We do not hold financial or derivative instruments for trading purposes.
A discussion of our accounting policies for financial and derivative instruments is included in Note 2 — 'Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies' of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and further disclosure is provided in Note 2624 — 'Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities'.
Foreign Exchange Risk Management
Because of the large number of countries and currencies we operate in, movements in currency exchange rates may affect our results.
We report our operating results and financial condition in US dollars. Our US operations earn revenue and incur expenses primarily in US dollars. Outside the United States, we predominantly generate revenues and expenses in the local currency with the exception of our London market operations which earns revenues in several currencies but incurs expenses predominantly in pounds sterling.
The table below gives an approximate analysis of revenues and expenses by currency in 20132014.
US
Dollars
 
Pounds
Sterling
 Euros 
Other
currencies
US
Dollars
 
Pounds
Sterling
 Euros 
Other
currencies
Revenues60% 8% 13% 19%58% 8% 13% 21%
Expenses49% 25% 9% 17%46% 25% 9% 20%
Our principal exposures to foreign exchange risk arise from:
our London market operations; and
translation.
London market operations
In our London market operations, we earn revenue in a number of different currencies, principally US dollars, pounds sterling, Euros and Japanese yen, but incur expenses almost entirely in pounds sterling.
We hedge this risk as follows:
to the extent that forecast pounds sterling expenses exceed pound sterling revenues, we limit our exposure to this exchange rate risk by the use of forward contracts matched to specific, clearly identified cash outflows arising in the ordinary course of business; and

65


Willis Group Holdings plc


to the extent our London marketUK operations earn significant revenues in Euros and Japanese yen, we limit our exposure to changes in the exchange rate between the US dollar and these currencies by the use of forward contracts matched to a percentage of forecast cash inflows in specific currencies and periods. In addition, we are also exposed to foreign exchange risk on any net sterling asset or liability position in our London market operations.
However, where the foreign exchange risk relates to any sterling pension assets benefit or liability for pensions benefit, we do not hedge the risk. Consequently, if our London market operations have a significant pension asset or liability, we may be exposed to accounting gains and losses if the US dollar and pounds sterling exchange rate changes. We do, however, hedge the pounds sterling contributions into the pension plan.
Translation risk
Outside our US and London market operations, we predominantly earn revenues and incur expenses in the local currency. When we translate the results and net assets of these operations into US dollars for reporting purposes, movements in exchange rates will affect reported results and net assets. For example, if the US dollar strengthens against the Euro, the reported results of our Eurozone operations in US dollar terms will be lower.

67


Willis Group Holdings plc


With the exception of foreign currency hedges for certain intercompany loans that are not designated as hedging instruments, we do not hedge translation risk.
The table below provides information about our foreign currency forward exchange contracts, which are sensitive to exchange rate risk. The table summarizes the US dollar equivalent amounts of each currency bought and sold forward and the weighted average contractual exchange rates. All forward exchange contracts mature within three years.
Settlement date before December 31,Settlement date before December 31,
2014 2015 20162015 2016 2017
December 31, 2013Contract amount Average contractual exchange rate Contract amount Average contractual exchange rate Contract amount Average contractual exchange rate
December 31, 2014Contract amount Average contractual exchange rate Contract amount Average contractual exchange rate Contract amount Average contractual exchange rate
(millions)   (millions)   (millions)  (millions)   (millions)   (millions)  
Foreign currency sold 
    
    
   
    
    
  
US dollars sold for sterling$212
 $1.57 = £1 $91
 $1.53 = £1 $
 $349
 $1.60 = £1 $245
 $1.61 = £1 $84
 $1.58 = £1
Euro sold for US dollars60
 €1 = $1.33 37
 €1 = $1.36 
 98
 €1 = $1.36 62
 €1 = $1.36 26
 €1 = $1.32
Japanese yen sold for US dollars23
 ¥ 88.08=$1 12
 ¥ 97.98 = $1 
 28
 ¥ 100.84=$1 17
 ¥ 101.50 = $1 6
 ¥ 106.33 = $1
Total$295
   $140
   $
  $475
   $324
   $116
  
Fair Value (i)
$13
   $8
   $
  $4
   $
   $1
  
Settlement date before December 31,Settlement date before December 31,
2013 2014 20152014 2015 2016
December 31, 2012Contract amount Average contractual exchange rate Contract amount Average contractual exchange rate Contract amount Average contractual exchange rate
December 31, 2013Contract amount Average contractual exchange rate Contract amount Average contractual exchange rate Contract amount Average contractual exchange rate
(millions)   (millions)   (millions)  (millions)   (millions)   (millions)  
Foreign currency sold 
    
    
   
    
    
  
US dollars sold for sterling$167
 $1.59 = £1 $88
 $1.60 = £1 $
 $212
 $1.57 = £1 $91
 $1.53 = £1 $
 
Euro sold for US dollars55
 €1 = $1.36 ��
  
 60
 €1 = $1.33 37
 €1 = $1.36 
 
Japanese yen sold for US dollars22
 ¥ 81.72=$1 10
 ¥ 79.02=$1 
 23
 ¥ 88.08=$1 12
 ¥ 97.98=$1 
 
Total$244
   $98
   $
  $295
   $140
   $
  
Fair Value (i)
$7
   $2
   $
  $13
   $8
   $
  
_________________
(i) 
Represents the difference between the contract amount and the cash flow in US dollars which would have been receivable had the foreign currency forward exchange contracts been entered into on December 31, 20132014 or 20122013 at the forward exchange rates prevailing at that date.
Income earned within foreign subsidiaries outside of the UKUnited Kingdom is generally offset by expenses in the same local currency but the Company does have exposure to foreign exchange movements on the net income of these entities.

66


Market risk

Interest rate risk management
Our operations are financed principally by $2,054 million fixed rate senior notes issued by the Group and $274$259 million under a 7-year term loan facility. Of the fixed rate senior notes, $148 million are due 2015, $300 million are due 2016, $394 million are due 2017, $187 million are due 2019, $500 million are due 2021, $250 million are due 2023, and $275 million are due 2043. The 7-year term loan facility is repayable in quarterly installments and a final repayment of $186 million is due in the second quarter of 2018. As of December 31, 20132014 we had access to $822$1,122 million under threefour revolving credit facilities, of which $798 million is available for general corporate purposes, and, as at this date, no amount was outstanding under those facilities. The interest rate applicable to the bank borrowing is variable according to the period of each individual drawdown.
We are also subject to market risk from exposure to changes in interest rates based on our investing activities where our primary interest rate risk arises from changes in short-term interest rates in both US dollars and pounds sterling.

68


Market risk

As a result of our operating activities, we receive cash for premiums and claims which we deposit in short-term investments denominated in US dollars and other currencies. We earn interest on these funds, which is included in our consolidated financial statements as investment income. These funds are regulated in terms of access and the instruments in which they may be invested, most of which are short-term in maturity. In order to manage interest rate risk arising from these financial assets, we entered into interest rate swaps to receive a fixed rate of interest and pay a variable rate of interest in the various currencies related to the short-term investments. The use of interest rate contracts essentially converted groups of short-term variable rate investments to fixed rates. However, in the fourth quarter of 2011, we stopped renewing hedged positions on their maturity given the flat yield curve environment. Further to this, during second quarter 2012, the Company closed out its legacy position for these interest rate swap contracts.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company entered into a series of interest rate swaps for a total notional amount of $350 million to receive a fixed rate and pay a variable rate on a semi-annual basis, with a maturity date of July 15, 2015. The Company had previously designated these instruments as fair value hedges against its $350 million 5.625% senior notes due 2015 and had accounted for them accordingly until the first quarter of 2013 at which point these swaps, although remaining as economic hedges, no longer qualified for hedge accounting. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 the Company closed out the above interest rate swaps and received a cash settlement of $13 million on termination.
The table below provides information about our derivative instruments and other financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For interest rate swaps, the table presents notional principal amounts and average interest rates analyzed by expected maturity dates. Notional principal amounts are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contracts. The duration of interest rate swaps varied between one and five years, with re-fixing periods of three to six months. Average fixed and variable rates are, respectively, the weighted-average actual and market rates for the interest rate hedges in place. Market rates are the rates prevailing at December 31, 20132014 or 20122013, as appropriate.

  Expected to mature before December 31,      
December 31, 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total 
Fair Value(i)
  ($ millions, except percentages)
Fixed rate debt  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Principal ($)   148
 300
 394
 

 1,212
 2,054
 2,185
Fixed rate payable   5.625%
 4.125% 6.200% 

 5.796% 5.617%  
Floating rate debt  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Principal ($) 15
 17
 23
 23
 196
  
 274
 274
Variable rate payable 1.84% 2.45% 3.51% 4.36% 4.73%  
 4.52%  
  Expected to mature before December 31,      
December 31, 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Thereafter Total 
Fair Value (i)
  ($ millions, except percentages)
Fixed rate debt  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Principal ($)    
 350
 300
 600
 800
 2,050
 2,302
Fixed rate payable    
 5.625%
 4.125% 6.200% 6.219% 5.805%  
Floating rate debt  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Principal ($) 15
 15
 17
 242
    
 289
 289
Variable rate payable 1.89% 2.05% 2.34% 3.00%    
 2.93%  
Interest rate swaps  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Fixed to Variable  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Principal ($)  
  
  
 350
  
  
 350
 22
Fixed rate receivable  
  
  
 2.71%  
  
 2.71%  
Variable rate payable  
  
  
 0.75%  
  
 0.75%  
  Expected to mature before December 31,      
December 31, 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Thereafter Total 
Fair Value(i)
  ($ millions, except percentages)
Fixed rate debt  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Principal ($) 148
 300
 394
 

 187
 1,025
 2,054
 2,237
Fixed rate payable 5.625% 4.125% 6.200% 

 7.000% 5.576% 5.617%  
Floating rate debt  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Principal ($) 17
 23
 22
 197
 

  
 259
 259
Variable rate payable 2.26% 3.00% 3.43% 3.45% 

  
 3.40%  

67


Willis Group Holdings plc


  Expected to mature before December 31,      
December 31, 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total 
Fair Value (i)
  ($ millions, except percentages)
Fixed rate debt  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Principal ($)   148
 300
 394
   1,212
 2,054
 2,185
Fixed rate payable   5.625% 4.125%
 6.200%   5.796% 5.617%  
Floating rate debt  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Principal ($) 15
 17
 23
 23
 196
  
 274
 274
Variable rate payable 1.84% 2.45% 3.51% 4.36% 4.73%  
 4.51%  
_________________
(i) 
Represents the net present value of the expected cash flows discounted at current market rates of interest or quoted market rates as appropriate.


69


Willis Group Holdings plc


Liquidity Risk
Our objective is to ensure we have the ability to generate sufficient cash either from internal or external sources, in a timely and cost-effective manner, to meet our commitments as they fall due. Our management of liquidity risk is embedded within our overall risk management framework. Scenario analysis is continually undertaken to ensure that our resources can meet our liquidity requirements. These resources are supplemented by access to $822$1,122 million under threefour revolving credit facilities.facilities, of which $798 million is available for general corporate purposes. We undertake short-term foreign exchange swaps for liquidity purposes.
See ‘Liquidity and Capital Resources’ section under Item 7, 'Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations'.

Credit Risk and Concentrations of Credit Risk
Credit risk represents the loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed to perform as contracted and from movements in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. The Company currently does not anticipate non-performance by its counterparties. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk; however, it is the Company's policy to enter into master netting arrangements with counterparties as practical.risk.
Concentrations of credit risk that arise from financial instruments exist for groups of customers or counterparties when they have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. Financial instruments on the balance sheet that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, fiduciary funds, accounts receivable and derivatives which are recorded at fair value.
The Company maintains a policy providing for the diversification of cash and cash equivalent investments and places such investments in an extensive number of financial institutions to limit the amount of credit risk exposure. These financial institutions are monitored on an ongoing basis for credit quality predominantly using information provided by credit agencies.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to receivables are limited due to the large number of clients and markets in which the Company does business, as well as the dispersion across many geographic areas. Management does not believe significant risk exists in connection with the Company's concentrations of credit as of December 31, 2013.2014.


7068


Financial statements

Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
  Page
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


7169


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company
Dublin, Ireland
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company and subsidiaries (the ‘Company’) as of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132014. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Notes 30 to 32 the the financial statements, the 2012 and 2011 financial statements have been restated to be in accordance with the principles for presentation of condensed consolidating financial information contained in the United States Code of Federation Regulations (17 CFR Part 210) Regulations S-X, Article 3-10.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 27, 201424, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte LLP
London, United Kingdom
February 27, 201424, 2015


7270


Financial statements

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
  Years ended December 31,  Years ended December 31,
Note 2013 2012 2011Note 2014 2013 2012
  (millions, except per share data)  (millions, except per share data)
REVENUES 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Commissions and fees 
 $3,633
 $3,458
 $3,414
 
 $3,767
 $3,633
 $3,458
Investment income 
 15
 18
 31
 
 16
 15
 18
Other income 
 7
 4
 2
 
 19
 7
 4
Total revenues 
 3,655
 3,480
 3,447
 
 3,802
 3,655
 3,480
EXPENSES 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Salaries and benefits3
 (2,207) (2,475) (2,087)3
 (2,314) (2,207) (2,475)
Other operating expenses 
 (616) (581) (656) 
 (659) (636) (600)
Depreciation expense12
 (94) (79) (74)11
 (92) (94) (79)
Amortization of intangible assets14
 (55) (59) (68)13
 (54) (55) (59)
Goodwill impairment charge13
 
 (492) 
12
 
 
 (492)
Net gain (loss) on disposal of operations6
 2
 (3) 4
Restructuring costs5
 (36) 
 
Total expenses 
 (2,970) (3,689) (2,881) 
 (3,155) (2,992) (3,705)
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) 
 685
 (209) 566
 
 647
 663
 (225)
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs 
 
 
 (171)
Other income (expense), net7
 6
 22
 16
Loss on extinguishment of debt20
 (60) 
 
18
 
 (60) 
Interest expense20
 (126) (128) (156)18
 (135) (126) (128)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES 
 499
 (337) 239
 
 518
 499
 (337)
Income taxes7
 (122) (101) (32)8
 (159) (122) (101)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES 
 377
 (438) 207
 
 359
 377
 (438)
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax15
 
 5
 12
  14
 
 5
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS 
 377
 (433) 219
Discontinued operations, net of tax8
 
 
 1
NET INCOME (LOSS) 
 377
 (433) 220
 
 373
 377
 (433)
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 
 (12) (13) (16) 
 (11) (12) (13)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS 
 $365
 $(446) $204
AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS SHAREHOLDERS 
  
  
  
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax 
 $365
 $(446) $203
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax 
 
 
 1
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS 
 $365
 $(446) $204
 
 $362
 $365
 $(446)
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE9
  
  
  
9
  
  
  
— Continuing operations 
 $2.07
 $(2.58) $1.17
 
 $2.03
 $2.07
 $(2.58)
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE9
  
  
  
9
  
  
  
— Continuing operations 
 $2.04
 $(2.58) $1.15
 
 $2.00
 $2.04
 $(2.58)
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE 
 $1.12
 $1.08
 $1.04
 
 $1.20
 $1.12
 $1.08
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

7371


Willis Group Holdings plc


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
  Years ended December 31,  Years ended December 31,
Note 2013 2012 2011Note 2014 2013 2012
  (millions)  (millions)
              
Net income (loss)  $377
 $(433) $220
  $373
 $377
 $(433)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:       
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:       
Foreign currency translation adjustments  20
 46
 (29)  (183) 20
 46
Pension funding adjustment:              
Foreign currency translation on pension funding adjustment  (10) (22) 8
  37
 (10) (22)
Net actuarial gain (loss)  85
 (167) (208)
Prior service gain  
 
 7
Net actuarial (loss) gain  (255) 85
 (167)
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss  46
 38
 25
  40
 46
 38
Amortization of unrecognized prior service gain  (4) (5) (4)
Amortization of unrecognized prior service gain and curtailment  (3) (4) (5)
Curtailment gain  2
 
 
  117
 (156) (172)  (179) 117
 (156)
Derivative instruments:              
Gain on interest rate swaps (effective element)  
 2
 10
  
 
 2
Interest rate swap reclassification adjustment  (4) (4) (10)  (4) (4) (4)
Gain on forward exchange contracts (effective element)  8
 9
 2
(Loss) gain on forward exchange contracts (effective element)  (25) 8
 9
Forward exchange contracts reclassification adjustment  1
 (3) (5)  13
 1
 (3)
Gain on treasury lock (effective element)  15
 
 
  
 15
 
Treasury lock reclassification adjustment  (1) 
 
  20
 4
 (3)  (17) 20
 4
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax23
 157
 (106) (204)
Comprehensive income (loss)  534
 (539) 16
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax21
 (379) 157
 (106)
Comprehensive (loss) income  (6) 534
 (539)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests  (12) (13) (15)  (5) (12) (13)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings  $522
 $(552) $1
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Willis Group Holdings  $(11) $522
 $(552)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


72


Financial statements

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
   December 31,
 Note 2014 2013
   (millions, except share data)
ASSETS 
  
  
CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents 
 $635
 $796
Accounts receivable, net 
 1,044
 1,041
Fiduciary assets  8,948
 8,412
Deferred tax assets8
 12
 15
Other current assets14
 214
 197
Total current assets 
 10,853
 10,461
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
Fixed assets, net11
 483
 481
Goodwill12
 2,937
 2,838
Other intangible assets, net13
 450
 353
Investments in associates  169
 176
Deferred tax assets8
 9
 7
Pension benefits asset17
 314
 278
Other non-current assets14
 220
 206
Total non-current assets 
 4,582
 4,339
TOTAL ASSETS 
 $15,435
 $14,800
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
Fiduciary liabilities 
 $8,948
 $8,412
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses 
 619
 586
Income taxes payable 
 33
 21
Current portion of long-term debt18
 167
 15
Deferred tax liabilities8
 21
 25
Other current liabilities15
 444
 415
Total current liabilities 
 10,232
 9,474
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
Long-term debt18
 2,142
 2,311
Liability for pension benefits17
 284
 136
Deferred tax liabilities8
 128
 56
Provisions for liabilities19
 194
 206
Other non-current liabilities15
 389
 374
Total non-current liabilities 
 3,137
 3,083
Total liabilities 
 13,369
 12,557
(Continued on next page)


73


Willis Group Holdings plc


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
   December 31,
 Note 2014 2013
   (millions, except share data)
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES20
 
 
      
REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST  59
 
      
EQUITY 
    
Ordinary shares, $0.000115 nominal value; Authorized: 4,000,000,000; Issued 178,701,479 shares in 2014 and 178,861,250 shares in 2013 
 
 
Ordinary shares, €1 nominal value; Authorized: 40,000; Issued 40,000 shares in 2014 and 2013 
 
 
Preference shares, $0.000115 nominal value; Authorized: 1,000,000,000; Issued nil shares in 2014 and 2013 
 
 
Additional paid-in capital 
 1,524
 1,316
Retained earnings 
 1,530
 1,595
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax21
 (1,066) (693)
Treasury shares, at cost, 46,408 shares in 2014 and 2013, and 40,000 shares, €1 nominal value, in 2014 and 2013 
 (3) (3)
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity  1,985
 2,215
Noncontrolling interests  22
 28
Total equity  2,007
 2,243
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
 $15,435
 $14,800

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


74


Financial statements

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSSTATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
   Years ended December 31,
 Note 2014 2013 2012
   (millions)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
Net income (loss) 
 $373
 $377
 $(433)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to total net cash provided by operating activities: 
  
  
  
Goodwill impairment12
 
 
 492
Net gain on disposal of operations, fixed and intangible assets 
 (17) (7) 
Depreciation expense11
 92
 94
 79
Amortization of intangible assets13
 54
 55
 59
Amortization and write-off of cash retention awards  10
 6
 416
Net periodic (benefit) cost of defined benefit pension plans17
 (17) (4) 2
Provision for doubtful accounts16
 4
 3
 16
Provision for deferred income taxes 
 66
 39
 54
Gain on derivative instruments  (12) 18
 11
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements 
 (5) (2) (2)
Share-based compensation4
 52
 42
 32
Tender premium included in loss on extinguishment of debt18
 
 65
 
Undistributed earnings of associates 
 (9) 8
 (2)
Effect of exchange rate changes on net income 
 39
 (4) (14)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from purchase of subsidiaries: 
  
  
  
Accounts receivable 
 (66) (116) (17)
Fiduciary assets 
 (887) 804
 111
Fiduciary liabilities 
 887
 (804) (111)
Cash incentives paid  (401) (346) (323)
Funding of defined benefit pension plans17
 (122) (150) (143)
Other assets 
 16
 14
 (1)
Other liabilities 
 432
 445
 319
Movement on provisions 
 (12) 24
 (20)
Total net cash provided by operating activities 
 477
 561
 525
   December 31,
 Note 2013 2012
   (millions, except share data)
ASSETS 
  
  
CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents 
 $796
 $500
Accounts receivable, net 
 1,041
 933
Fiduciary assets11
 8,412
 9,271
Deferred tax assets7
 15
 13
Other current assets16
 197
 181
Total current assets 
 10,461
 10,898
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
Fixed assets, net12
 481
 468
Goodwill13
 2,838
 2,827
Other intangible assets, net14
 353
 385
Investments in associates15
 176
 174
Deferred tax assets7
 7
 18
Pension benefits asset19
 278
 136
Other non-current assets16
 206
 206
Total non-current assets 
 4,339
 4,214
TOTAL ASSETS 
 $14,800
 $15,112
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
Fiduciary liabilities 
 $8,412
 $9,271
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses 
 586
 541
Income taxes payable 
 21
 19
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt20
 15
 15
Deferred tax liabilities7
 25
 21
Other current liabilities17
 415
 327
Total current liabilities 
 9,474
 10,194
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
Long-term debt20
 2,311
 2,338
Liability for pension benefits19
 136
 282
Deferred tax liabilities7
 56
 18
Provisions for liabilities21
 206
 180
Other non-current liabilities17
 374
 375
Total non-current liabilities 
 3,083
 3,193
Total liabilities 
 12,557
 13,387
(Continued on next page)


75


Willis Group Holdings plc


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSSTATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
   December 31,
 Note 2013 2012
   (millions, except share data)
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES22
 

 

EQUITY 
  
  
Ordinary shares, $0.000115 nominal value; Authorized: 4,000,000,000; Issued 178,861,250 shares in 2013 and 173,178,733 shares in 2012 
 
 
Ordinary shares, €1 nominal value; Authorized: 40,000; Issued 40,000 shares in 2013 and 2012 
 
 
Preference shares, $0.000115 nominal value; Authorized: 1,000,000,000; Issued nil shares in 2013 and 2012 
 
 
Additional paid-in capital 
 1,316
 1,125
Retained earnings 
 1,595
 1,427
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax23
 (693) (850)
Treasury shares, at cost, 46,408 shares in 2013 and 2012, and 40,000 shares, €1 nominal value, in 2013 and 2012 
 (3) (3)
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity  2,215
 1,699
Noncontrolling interests24
 28
 26
Total equity  2,243
 1,725
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
 $14,800
 $15,112
   Years ended December 31,
 Note 2014 2013 2012
   (millions)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES   
  
  
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets  6
 12
 5
Additions to fixed assets  (113) (112) (135)
Additions to intangible assets  (4) (7) (2)
Acquisitions of operations, net of cash acquired  (241) (30) (33)
Payments to acquire other investments, net of distributions received  (10) (7) (7)
Proceeds from sale of associates  
 4
 
Proceeds from sale of operations, net of cash disposed  86
 20
 
Net cash used in investing activities  (276) (120) (172)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES   
  
  
Senior notes issued18 
 522
 
Debt issuance costs  (3) (8) 
Repayments of debt18 (15) (536) (15)
Tender premium on extinguishment of senior notes18 
 (65) 
Proceeds from issue of other debt  
 
 1
Repurchase of shares  (213) 
 (100)
Proceeds from issue of shares  134
 155
 53
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements  5
 2
 2
Dividends paid  (210) (193) (185)
Proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interests  
 
 3
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests  (4) (4) (39)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests  (17) (10) (11)
Net cash used in financing activities  (323) (137) (291)
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (122) 304
 62
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  (39) (8) 2
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR  796
 500
 436
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR  $635
 $796
 $500

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


76

Financial statements
Willis Group Holdings plc


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSEQUITY
   Years ended December 31,
 Note 2013 2012 2011
   (millions)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
Net income (loss) 
 $377
 $(433) $220
Adjustments to reconcile net income to total net cash provided by operating activities: 
  
  
  
Income from discontinued operations 
 
 
 (1)
Goodwill impairment  
 492
 
Net gain on disposal of operations, fixed and intangible assets 
 (7) 
 (6)
Depreciation expense12
 94
 79
 74
Amortization of intangible assets14
 55
 59
 68
Amortization and write-off of cash retention awards3
 6
 416
 185
Net periodic cost of defined benefit pension plans19
 (4) 2
 11
Provision for doubtful accounts18
 3
 16
 4
Provision for deferred income taxes 
 39
 54
 17
Gain on derivative instruments  18
 11
 3
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements 
 (2) (2) (5)
Share-based compensation4
 42
 32
 41
Tender premium included in loss on extinguishment of debt20
 65
 
 
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs 
 
 
 171
Undistributed earnings of associates 
 8
 (2) (5)
Effect of exchange rate changes on net income 
 (4) (14) 14
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from purchase of subsidiaries: 
  
  
  
Accounts receivable 
 (116) (17) (92)
Fiduciary assets 
 804
 111
 162
Fiduciary liabilities 
 (804) (111) (162)
Cash incentives paid  (346) (323) (310)
Funding of defined benefit pension plans19
 (150) (143) (135)
Other assets 
 14
 (1) 70
Other liabilities 
 445
 319
 101
Movement on provisions 
 24
 (20) 16
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities 
 561
 525
 441
Net cash used in discontinued operating activities 
 
 
 (2)
Total net cash provided by operating activities 
 561
 525
 439
(Continued on next page)
 Shares outstanding Ordinary shares and APIC (i) Retained Earnings Treasury Stock AOCL (ii) Total WGH shareholders' equity Noncontrolling Interests Total Equity Redeemable Noncontrolling interests (iii) Total
 (thousands) (millions)
Balance at January 1, 2012173,830
 $1,073
 $2,160
 $(3) $(744) $2,486
 $31
 $2,517
 $
  
Shares repurchased(2,797) 
 (100) 
 
 (100) 
 (100) 
  
Net (loss) income
 
 (446) 
 
 (446) 13
 (433) 
 $(433)
Dividends
 
 (187) 
 
 (187) (11) (198) 
  
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 (106) (106) 
 (106) 
 $(106)
Issue of shares under employee stock compensation plans and related tax benefits2,122
 50
 
 
 
 50
 
 50
 
  
Issue of shares for acquisitions24
 1
 
 
 
 1
 
 1
 
  
Share-based compensation
 32
 
 
 
 32
 
 32
 
  
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests, net
 (31) 
 
 
 (31) (8) (39) 
  
Additional noncontrolling interests
 2
 
 
 
 2
 1
 3
 
  
Foreign currency translation
 (2) 
 
 
 (2) 
 (2) 
  
                    
Balance at December 31, 2012173,179
 1,125
 1,427
 (3) (850) 1,699
 26
 1,725
 
  
Net income
 
 365
 
 
 365
 12
 377
 
 $377
Dividends
 
 (197) 
 
 (197) (10) (207) 
  
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 157
 157
 
 157
 
 $157
Issue of shares under employee stock compensation plans and related tax benefits5,682
 153
 
 
 
 153
 
 153
 
  
Share-based compensation
 42
 
 
 
 42
 
 42
 
  
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests, net
 (4) 
 
 
 (4) 
 (4) 
  
                    
Balance at December 31, 2013178,861
 1,316
 1,595
 (3) (693) 2,215
 28
 2,243
 
  
Shares repurchased(5,050) 
 (213) 
 
 (213) 
 (213) 
  
Net income
 
 362
 
 
 362
 11
 373
 
 $373
Dividends
 
 (214) 
 
 (214) (17) (231) 
  
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 (373) (373) (2) (375) (4) $(379)
Issue of shares under employee stock compensation plans and related tax benefits4,854
 146
 
 
 
 146
 
 146
 
  
Issue of shares for acquisitions36
 1
 
 
 
 1
 
 1
 
  
Share-based compensation
 52
 
 
 
 52
 
 52
 
  
Additional noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 2
 2
 63
  
Foreign currency translation
 9
 
 
 
 9
 
 9
 
  
                    
Balance at December 31, 2014178,701
 $1,524
 $1,530
 $(3) $(1,066) $1,985
 $22
 $2,007
 $59
  


(i)
APIC means Additional Paid-In Capital
(ii)
AOCL means Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax
(iii)
In accordance with the requirements of Accounting Standards Codification 480-10-S99-3A we have determined that the noncontrolling interest in Max Matthiessen Holding AB should be disclosed as a redeemable noncontrolling interest and presented within mezzanine or temporary equity

77


Willis Group Holdings plc


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
   Years ended December 31,
 Note 2013 2012 2011
   (millions)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES   
  
  
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets  12
 5
 13
Additions to fixed assets  (112) (135) (111)
Additions to intangible assets  (7) (2) 
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired  (30) (33) (10)
Acquisition of investments in associates  
 
 (2)
Payments to acquire other investments  (7) (7) (5)
Proceeds from sale of associates  4
 
 
Proceeds from sale of operations, net of cash disposed  20
 
 14
Net cash used in continuing investing activities  (120) (172) (101)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES   
  
  
Repayment of revolving credit facility  
 
 (90)
Senior notes issued20 522
 
 794
Debt issuance costs  (8) 
 (12)
Repayments of debt20 (536) (15) (911)
Tender premium on extinguishment of senior notes20 (65) 
 
Proceeds from issue of term loan  
 
 300
Proceeds from issue of other debt  
 1
 
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes  
 
 (158)
Repurchase of shares  
 (100) 
Proceeds from issue of shares  155
 53
 60
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements  2
 2
 5
Dividends paid  (193) (185) (180)
Proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interests  
 3
 
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests  (4) (39) (9)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests  (10) (11) (13)
Net cash used in continuing financing activities  (137) (291) (214)
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  304
 62
 124
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  (8) 2
 (4)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR  500
 436
 316
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR  $796
 $500
 $436

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


78


Notes to the financial statements

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
   December 31,
 Note 2013 2012 2011
   (millions, except share data)
SHARES OUTSTANDING (thousands)   
  
  
Balance, beginning of year  173,179
 173,830
 170,884
Shares issued  
 24
 
Shares repurchased  
 (2,797) 
Exercise of stock options and release of non-vested shares  5,682
 2,122
 2,946
Balance, end of year  178,861
 173,179
 173,830
        
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL   
  
  
Balance, beginning of year  $1,125
 $1,073
 $985
Issue of shares under employee stock compensation plans and related tax benefits  153
 50
 49
Issue of shares for acquisitions  
 1
 
Share-based compensation  42
 32
 39
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests  (4) (31) 
Disposal of noncontrolling interests  
 2
 
Foreign currency translation  
 (2) 
Balance, end of year  1,316
 1,125
 1,073
        
RETAINED EARNINGS   
  
  
Balance, beginning of year  1,427
 2,160
 2,136
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings  365
 (446) 204
Dividends  (197) (187) (180)
Repurchase of shares  
 (100) 
Balance, end of year  1,595
 1,427
 2,160
        
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS, NET OF TAX       
Balance, beginning of year  (850) (744) (541)
Other comprehensive income (loss)23 157
 (106) (203)
Balance, end of year  (693) (850) (744)
        
TREASURY SHARES   
  
  
Balance, beginning of year  (3) (3) (3)
Balance, end of year  (3) (3) (3)
TOTAL WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY  $2,215
 $1,699
 $2,486
   (Continued on next page) 

79


Willis Group Holdings plc

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)

   December 31,
 Note 2013 2012 2011
   (millions, except share data)
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS   
  
  
Balance, beginning of year  $26
 $31
 $31
Net income  12
 13
 16
Dividends  (10) (11) (15)
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests, net  
 (8) 
Additional noncontrolling interests  
 1
 
Foreign currency translation  
 
 (1)
Balance, end of year  28
 26
 31
TOTAL EQUITY  $2,243
 $1,725
 $2,517


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


80


Notes to the financial statements


1.NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Willis provides a broad range of insurance and reinsurance broking and risk management consulting services to its clients worldwide, both directly and indirectly through its associates. The Company provides both specialized risk management advisory and consulting services on a global basis to clients engaged in specific industrial and commercial activities, and services to small, medium and large corporations through its retail operations.
In its capacity as an advisor, insurance and reinsurance broker, the Company acts as an intermediary between clients and insurance carriers by advising clients on risk management requirements, helping clients determine the best means of managing risk, and negotiating and placing insurance risk with insurance carriers through the Company’s global distribution network.

2.BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Recent Accounting Pronouncements to be Adopted in Future Periods
Other Comprehensive Income
In June 2011,April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)('FASB') issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)('ASU') No. 2011-05, Presentation2014-08, 'Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Comprehensive Income to reviseDisposals of Components of an Entity'. This guidance changes the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements. These changes require thatcriteria for reporting discontinued operations and enhances the related disclosures around discontinued operations. The new guidance requires a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of comprehensive income be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments do not change the items that mustan entity to be reported in other comprehensive incomediscontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has, or whenwill have, a major effect on an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income.This guidance is effective for interimentity’s operations and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and has been applied retrospectively.
ASU No. 2011-05 also requires entities to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12 in order to defer those changes in ASU No. 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive (ASU 2013-02). This guidance is the culmination of the FASB's deliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income but do require disclosure of amounts reclassified out of AOCI in its entirety, by component, on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross-referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail.results. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012 and has been applied retrospectively.2014.

PresentationIn May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, 'Revenue From Contracts With Customers'. The new standard supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance and eliminates industry-specific guidance. The ASU is based on the principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of Unrecognized Tax Benefitsgoods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to fulfill a contract. The ASU becomes effective for the Company at the beginning of its 2017 fiscal year; early adoption is not permitted. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach for the adoption of the new standard. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued guidance on the accounting for stock compensation where share-based payment awards granted to employees required specific performance targets to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and such performance targets could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period. The amendment in this update requires a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period to be treated as a performance condition. The guidance is applicable to the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, although earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Period
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, Presentation'Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward ExistsExists', a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. The ASU does not affect the recognition or measurementForce which provides guidance on financial statement presentation of uncertain tax positions under US GAAP.
However, under the ASU,an unrecognized tax benefits, or portions of unrecognised tax benefits, must be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to deferred tax assetsbenefit when a net operating loss carryforward a('NOL'), or similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists except when:
exists. Such unrecognized tax benefits are required to be presented as a net operating loss carryforward,reduction of a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryfoward is not available at the reporting date under the governing tax laws to settle taxes that would result from the disallowance of the tax position; or
the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for this purpose, provided thata NOL or other tax credit carryforward whenever the NOL or tax credit carryforward would be available to reduce the additional taxable income or tax due if the tax law permits a choice.position is disallowed.

If either of these conditions exists, an entity should present an unrecognized tax benefitThe Company adopted this guidance prospectively from January 1, 2014 and has not applied the amendments to the prior years. Upon adoption in the financial statements as a liabilityfirst quarter of 2014, other non-current liabilities and should not net the unrecognized tax benefit with a deferred tax asset.assets were reduced by $21 million.


8178


Willis Group Holdings plcNotes to the financial statements

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

The amendments under the ASU:
are effective prospectively for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2013 although early adoption is permitted; and
should be applied to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist as of the effective date although entities may choose to apply the amendments retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented.

The Company has decided to not adopt this guidance early. However, as an indication of the likely balance sheet reclassification based on the position at December 31, 2013, the Company had recognized $22 million of unrecognized tax benefits within Other non-current liabilities that would be reclassified to Non-current deferred tax assets. The Company has not yet determined whether it will apply the amendments to the prior reporting period for its first quarter 2014 reporting.
Significant Accounting Policies
These consolidated financial statements conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (‘US GAAP’). Presented below are summaries of significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to current year presentation. In particular, effective from January 1, 2014, the Company has made changes to the presentation of certain items within the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Foreign exchange gains and losses, primarily from balance sheet revaluation, and gains and losses from the disposal of operations, previously reported within 'Total operating expenses', are now reported in a new Statement of Operations line item, 'Other income (expense), net', which is reported below the 'Operating income (loss)' line item. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to this presentation.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Willis Group Holdings and its subsidiaries, which are controlled through the ownership of a majority voting interest. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.
Foreign Currency Translation
Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities in currencies other than the functional currency are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date and the related transaction gains and losses are reported in the statements of operations. Certain intercompany loans are determined to be of a long-term investment nature. The Company records transaction gains and losses from remeasuring such loans as a component of other comprehensive income.
Upon consolidation, the results of operations of subsidiaries and associates whose functional currency is other than the US dollar are translated into US dollars at the average exchange rate and assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates. Translation adjustments are presented as a separate component of other comprehensive income in the financial statements and are included in net income only upon sale or liquidation of the underlying foreign subsidiary or associated company.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. In the preparation of these consolidated financial statements, estimates and assumptions have been made by management concerning: the valuation of intangible assets and goodwill (including those acquired through business combinations); the selection of useful lives of fixed and intangible assets; impairment testing; provisions necessary for accounts receivable, commitments and contingencies and accrued liabilities; long-term asset returns, discount rates and mortality rates in order to estimate pension liabilities and pension expense; income tax valuation allowances; and other similar evaluations. Actual results could differ from the estimates underlying these consolidated financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of time deposits with original maturities of three months or less.



82


Notes to the financial statements

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Fiduciary Assets and Fiduciary Liabilities
In its capacity as an insurance agent or broker, the Company collects premiums from insureds and, after deducting its commissions, remits the premiums to the respective insurers; the Company also collects claims or refunds from insurers which it then remits to insureds.
Fiduciary Assets
Fiduciary assets comprise Fiduciary Receivables and Fiduciary Funds.


79


Willis Group Holdings plc

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Fiduciary Receivables
Fiduciary receivables represent uncollected premiums from insureds and uncollected claims or refunds from insurers.
Fiduciary Funds
Fiduciary funds represent unremitted premiums received from insureds and unremitted claims or refunds received from insurers. Fiduciary funds are generally required to be kept in certain regulated bank accounts subject to guidelines which emphasize capital preservation and liquidity. Such funds are not available to service the Company’s debt or for other corporate purposes. Notwithstanding the legal relationships with insureds and insurers, the Company is entitled to retain investment income earned on fiduciary funds in accordance with industry custom and practice and, in some cases, as supported by agreements with insureds.
The period for which the Company holds such funds is dependent upon the date the insured remits the payment of the premium to the Company, or the date the Company receives refunds from the insurers, and the date the Company is required to forward such payment to the insurer, or insured, respectively.
In certain instances, the Company advances premiums, refunds or claims to insurance underwriters or insureds prior to collection. Such advances are made from fiduciary funds and are reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as fiduciary assets.
Fiduciary Liabilities
TheFiduciary liabilities represent the obligations to remit thesefiduciary funds and fiduciary receivables to insurers or insureds are recorded as fiduciary liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The period for which the Company holds such funds is dependent upon the date the insured remits the payment of the premium to the Company and the date the Company is required to forward such payment to the insurer. Balances arising from insurance brokerage transactions are reported as separate assets or liabilities.insureds.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are stated at estimated net realizable values. Allowances are recorded, when necessary, in an amount considered by management to be sufficient to meet probable future losses related to uncollectible accounts.
Fixed Assets
Fixed assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for improvements are capitalized; repairs and maintenance are charged to expenses as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of assets.
Depreciation on buildings and long leaseholds is calculated over the lesser of 50 years or the lease term. Depreciation on leasehold improvements is calculated over the lesser of the useful life of the assets or the remaining lease term. Depreciation on furniture and equipment is calculated based on a range of 3 to 10 years. Freehold land is not depreciated.
Recoverability of Fixed Assets
Long-lived assets are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. Recoverability is determined based on the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset group. Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
Operating Leases
Rentals payable on operating leases are charged straight line to expenses over the lease term as the rentals become payable.


83


Willis Group Holdings plc

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of businesses acquired over the fair value of identifiable net assets at the dates of acquisition. The Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually and whenever facts or circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. In testing for impairment, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the amount of an

80


Notes to the financial statements

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

impairment loss, if any, is calculated by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill.
Acquired intangible assets are amortized over the following periods:
  Expected
 Amortization basislife (years)
Acquired other intangible assetsStraight line10
Acquired client relationshipsIn line with underlying cashflows105 to 20
Acquired non-compete agreementsmanagement contractsStraight line518
Acquired trade namesOther intangible assetsStraight line3 to 410
Amortizable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
Investments in Associates
Investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting if the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the investee. Significant influence is generally deemed to exist if the Company has an equity ownership in the voting stock of the investee between 20 and 50 percent, although other factors, such as representation on the Board of Directors and the impact of commercial arrangements, are considered in determining whether the equity method of accounting is appropriate. Under the equity method of accounting the investment is carried at cost of acquisition, plus the Company’s equity in undistributed net income since acquisition, less any dividends received since acquisition.
The Company periodically reviews its investments in associates for which fair value is less than cost to determine if the decline in value is other than temporary. If the decline in value is judged to be other than temporary, the cost basis of the investment is written down to fair value. The amount of any write-down is included in the statements of operations as a realized loss.
All other equity investments where the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence are accounted for by the cost method. Such investments are not publicly traded.
GS & Cie Groupe ('Gras Savoye') is the principal associate of the Company. It is France's leading insurance broker. The Company has a call option to purchase 100 percent of the capital of Gras Savoye, a decision on whether to exercise this or not will be taken by April 30, 2015, for exercise during 2016.
The carrying amount of the Gras Savoye investment as of December 31, 2014 includes interest bearing vendor loans and convertible bonds issued by Gras Savoye of $41 million and $106 million respectively (2013: $46 million and $110 million, respectively).
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments for other than trading purposes to alter the risk profile of an existing underlying exposure. Interest rate swaps arehave been used to manage interest risk exposures. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are used to manage currency exposures arising from future income and expenses. The fair values of derivative contracts are recorded in other assets and other liabilities. The effective portions of changes in the fair value of derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income. Amounts are reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings when the hedged exposure affects earnings. If the derivative is designated as, and qualifies as, an effective fair value hedge, the changes in the fair value of the derivative and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are both recognized in earnings. The amount of hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings is based on the extent to which an offset between the fair value of the derivative and hedged item is not achieved. Changes in fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting, together with any hedge ineffectiveness on those that do qualify, are recorded in other operating expenses or interest expense as appropriate.
The Company evaluates whether its contracts include clauses or conditions which would be required to be separately accounted for at fair value as embedded derivatives.

81


Willis Group Holdings plc

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax consequences of events attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating and capital loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and

84


Notes to the financial statements

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

liabilities of changes in tax rates is recognized in the statement of operations in the period in which the change is enacted. Deferred tax assets are reduced through the establishment of a valuation allowance at such time as, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company adjusts valuation allowances to measure deferred tax assets at the amount considered realizable in future periods if the Company’s facts and assumptions change. In making such determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations.
Positions taken in the Company’s tax returns may be subject to challenge by the taxing authorities upon examination. The Company recognizes the benefit of uncertain tax positions in the financial statements when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on examination by the tax authorities upon lapse of the relevant statute of limitations, or when positions are effectively settled. The benefit recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized on settlement with the tax authority, assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. The Company adjusts its recognition of these uncertain tax benefits in the period in which new information is available impacting either the recognition or measurement of its uncertain tax positions. These differences will beSuch adjustments are reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expensetaxes in the period in which they are determined.
Changes in tax laws and rates could also affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. Management is not aware of any such changes that would have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits within income taxes.
Provisions for Liabilities
The Company is subject to various actual and potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings. The Company records liabilities for such contingencies including legal costs when it is probable that a liability has been incurred before the balance sheet date and the amount can be reasonably estimated. To the extent such losses can be recovered under the Company’s insurance programs, estimated recoveries are recorded when losses for insured events are realized. Significant management judgment is required to estimate the amounts of such contingent liabilities and the related insurance recoveries. The Company analyzes its litigation exposure based on available information, including consultation with outside counsel handling the defense of these matters, to assess its potential liability. Contingent liabilities are not discounted.
Pensions
The Company has two principal defined benefit pension plans which cover approximately half of employees in the United States and United Kingdom. Both these plans are now closed to new entrants. New employees in the United Kingdom are offered the opportunity to join a defined contribution plan and in the United States are offered the opportunity to join a 401(k) plan. In addition there areto the Company’s UK and US defined benefit pension plans, the Company has several smaller defined benefit pension plans in certain other countries in which the Companyit operates including a US non-qualified plan and an unfunded plan in the United States.UK.. Elsewhere, pension benefits are typically provided through defined contribution plans.
Defined benefit plans
The net periodic cost of the Company’s defined benefit plans are measured on an actuarial basis using the projected unit credit method and several actuarial assumptions the most significant of which are the discount rate and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Other material assumptions include rates of participant mortality, the expected long-term rate of compensation and pension increases and rates of employee termination. Gains and losses occur when actual experience differs from actuarial assumptions. If such gains or losses exceed ten percent of the greater of plan assets or plan liabilities the Company amortizes those gains or losses over the average remaining service period or average remaining life expectancy as appropriate of the plan participants.
In accordance with US GAAP the Company records on the balance sheet the funded status of its pension plans based on the projected benefit obligation.



8582


Willis Group Holdings plcNotes to the financial statements

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Defined contribution plans
Contributions to the Company’s defined contribution plans are recognized as they fall due. Differences between contributions payable in the year and contributions actually paid are shown as either other assets or other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
Share-Based Compensation

The Company accountshas equity-based compensation plans that provide for share-basedgrants of restricted stock units and stock options
to employees and non-employee directors of the Company who perform services for the Company.

The Company expenses all equity-based compensation as follows:
the cost resulting from all equity awards is recognized in the financial statements at fair value estimated at the grant date;
the fair value is recognized (generally as compensation cost)on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for allbased upon the fair value of the award on the date of grant, the estimated achievement of any performance targets and anticipated staff retention. The awards that vest;under equity-based compensation are classified as equity and
compensation cost is included as a component of equity on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, as the ultimate payment of such awards will not recognized for awards that do not vest because servicebe achieved through use of the Company’s cash or performance conditions are not satisfied.other assets.

Revenue Recognition
Revenue includes insurance commissions, fees for services rendered, certain commissions receivable from insurance carriers, investment income and other income.
Brokerage income and fees negotiated in lieu of brokerage are recognized at the later of the policy inception date or when the policy placement is complete. Commissions on additional premiums and adjustments are recognized when approved by or agreed between the parties and collectability is reasonably assured.
Fees for risk management and other services are recognized as the services are provided. Consideration for negotiated fee arrangements for an agreed period covering multiple insurance placements, the provision of risk management and/or other services are allocated to all deliverables on the basis of their relative selling prices. The Company establishes contract cancellation reserves where appropriate: at December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, such amounts were not material.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company aligned the recognition of revenue in China and its North America Personal Lines business with the rest of the Group. The impact of these realignments was not material for prior periods and, consequently, the impacts of the realignments have been made in 2013.
Investment income is recognized as earned.
Other income comprises gains on disposal of intangible assets, which primarily arise onfrom settlements through enforcing non-compete agreements in the event of losing accounts through producer defection or the disposal of books of business. Although the Company is not in the business of selling intangible assets, from time to time the Company will dispose of a book of business (a customer list) or other intangible assets that do not produce adequate margins or fit with the Company’s strategy.

3.EMPLOYEES
The average number of persons, including Executive Directors, employed by the Company is as follows:
 Years ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
Global4,545
 4,304
 4,042
      
North America6,334
 6,323
 6,479
International7,072
 6,843
 6,634
Total Retail13,406
 13,166
 13,113
Total average number of employees for the year17,951
 17,470
 17,155
 Years ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
Total average number of employees for the year18,200
 17,900
 17,500

Salaries and benefits expense comprises the following:


8683


Notes to the financial statementsWillis Group Holdings plc

3. EMPLOYEES (Continued)

Salaries and benefits expense comprises the following:
Years ended December 31,Years ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
(millions)(millions)
Salaries and other compensation awards including amortization and write-off of cash retention awards of $6 million, $416 million and $185 million (see below)$1,953
 $2,258
 $1,776
Salaries and other compensation awards including amortization and write-off of cash retention awards of $10 million, $6 million and $416 million$2,069
 $1,953
 $2,258
Share-based compensation42
 32
 41
52
 42
 32
Severance costs32
 6
 89
8
 32
 6
Social security costs135
 133
 130
147
 135
 133
Retirement benefits — defined benefit plan (income) expense(4) 2
 11
(17) (4) 2
Retirement benefits — defined contribution plan expense49
 44
 40
55
 49
 44
Total salaries and benefits expense$2,207
 $2,475
 $2,087
$2,314
 $2,207
 $2,475

Severance Costs
Severance costs arisethat have arisen in the normal course of business and these charges amounted to $48 million in the year ended December 31, 20132014 (2013: $4 million; 2012: $6 million; 2011: $nil).
During the year ended December 31, 2013,, the Company incurred additional salaries and benefits costs of $29$29 million of which $28$28 million related to severance costs, in relation to an Expense Reduction Initiative in the first quarter. These costs related to 207 positions that have been eliminated.
During 2011, the Company incurred additional severance costs of $89 million relating to the Company's 2011 Operational Review. These costs relate to approximately 1,200 positions that were eliminated.

Cash Retention Awards
For the past several years, certain cash retention awards under the Company's annual incentive programs included a feature which required the recipient to repay a proportionate amount of the annual award if the employee voluntarily left the Company before a specified date, which was generally three years following the award. As previously disclosed, the Company made the cash payment to the recipient in the year of grant and recognized the payment in expense ratably over the period it was subject to repayment, beginning in the quarter in which the award was made. The unamortized portion of cash retention awards was recorded within 'other current assets' and 'other non-current assets' in the consolidated balance sheet.
The following table sets out the amount of cash retention awards made and the related amortization of those awards for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
 Years ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
 (millions)
Cash retention awards made$12
 $221
 $210
Amortization of cash retention awards included in salaries and benefits6
 216
 185

In December 2012, the Company decided to eliminate the repayment requirement from the past annual cash retention awards and, as a result, recognized a one-time, non-cash, pre-tax charge of $200 million which represented the write-off of the unamortized balance of past awards at that date.

There were however, a number of off-cycle awards with a fixed guarantee attached, for which the Company has not waived the repayment requirement. The unamortized portion of retention awards amounted to $15 million at December 31, 2013 (2012: $9 million; 2011: $196 million).

In addition, in 2012, the Company replaced annual cash retention awards with annual cash bonuses which did not include a repayment requirement. As at December 31, 2012, the Company had accrued $252 million for these bonuses.

87


Willis Group Holdings plc


4.SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
On December 31, 20132014, the Company had a number of open share-based compensation plans, which provide for the grant of time-based options and performance-based options, time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units, and various other share-based grants to employees. All of the Company’s share-based compensation plans under which any options, restricted stock units or other share-based grants are outstanding as at December 31, 20132014 are described below. The compensation cost that has been recognized for those plans for the year ended December 31, 20132014 was $52 million (2013: $42 million (; 2012: $32 million; 2011: $41 million). The total income tax benefit recognized in the statement of operations for share-based compensation arrangements for the year ended December 31, 20132014 was $912 million (20122013: $9 million; 20112012: $119 million).

2012 Equity Incentive Plan

This plan, which was established on April 25, 2012, provides for the granting of ISOs,incentive stock options, time-based or performance-based non-statutory stock options, share appreciation rights, ('SARs'), restricted shares, time-based or performance-based restricted share units ('RSUs'), performance-based awards and other share-based grants or any combination thereof (collectively referred to as 'Awards') to employees, officers, directors and consultants ('Eligible Individuals') of the Company and any of its subsidiaries (the 'Willis Group').Company. The Board of Directors also adopted a sub-plan under the 2012 plan to provide an employee sharesave scheme in the UK.United Kingdom.
There are 13,776,935 shares available for grant under this plan. In addition, Sharesshares subject to awards that were granted under the Willis Group Holdings 2008 Share Purchase and Option Plan, that terminate, expire or lapse for any reason will be made available for future Awards under this Plan. Options are exercisable on a variety of dates, including from the second, third, fourth or fifth anniversary of grant. Unless terminated sooner by the Board of Directors, the 2012 Plan will expire 10 years after the date of its adoption. That termination will not affect the validity of any grants outstanding at that date.
2008 Share Purchase and Option Plan
This plan, which was established on April 23, 2008, provides for the granting of time and performance-based options, restricted stock units and various other share-based grants at fair market value to employees of the Company. The 2008 plan was

84


Notes to the financial statements

4. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

terminated as at April 25, 2012 and no further grants will be made under this plan. Any shares available for grant under the 2008 plan were included in the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan availability.
Options are exercisable on a variety of dates, including from the third, fourth or fifth anniversary of grant.
2001 Share Purchase and Option Plan
This plan, which was established on May 3, 2001, provides for the granting of time-based options, restricted stock units and various other share-based grants at fair market value to employees of the Company. The Board of Directors has adopted several sub-plans under the 2001 plan to provide employee sharesave schemes in the UK, Ireland and internationally. The 2001 Plan (and all sub-plans) expired on May 3, 2011 and no further grants will be made under the plan. Options are exercisable on a variety of dates, including from the first, second, third, sixth or eighth anniversary of grant, although for certain options the exercisable date may accelerate depending on the achievement of certain performance goals.
HRH Option Plans
Options granted under the Hilb Rogal and Hamilton Company 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (‘HRH 2000 Plan’) and the Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the ‘HRH 2007 Plan’) were converted into options to acquire shares of Willis Group Holdings. No further grants are to be made under the HRH 2000 Plan. Willis is authorized to grant equity awards under the HRH 2007 Plan until 2017 to employees who were formerly employed by HRH and to new employees who have joined Willis or one of its subsidiaries since October 1, 2008, the date that the acquisition of HRH was completed.
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
The Company has adopted the Willis Group Holdings 2001 North America Employee Share Purchase Plan, which expired on May 31, 2011 and the Willis Group Holdings 2010 North America Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which expires on May 31, 2020. TheyThese plans provide certain eligible employees to the Company’s subsidiaries in the USUnited States and Canada the ability to contribute payroll deductions to the purchase of Willis SharesGroup Holdings plc shares at the end of each offering period.

88

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

4. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

Option Valuation Assumptions
The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Company uses the simplified method set out in Accounting Standard Codification (‘ASC’) 718-10-S99 to derive the expected term of options granted as it does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term. The risk-free rate for periods within the expected life of the option is based on the US Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
Years ended December 31,Years ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
Expected volatility24.7% 32.1% 31.4%18.7% 24.7% 32.1%
Expected dividends2.6% 3.2% 2.5%2.8% 2.6% 3.2%
Expected life (years)4
 5
 6
4
 4
 5
Risk-free interest rate1.5% 0.9% 2.2%1.3% 1.5% 0.9%


85

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

4. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

A summary of option activity under the plans at December 31, 20132014, and changes during the year then ended is presented below:
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
(Options in thousands)Options 
Price(i)
 Term ValueOptions 
Price(i)
 Term Value
      (millions)      (millions)
Time-based stock options 
  
    
 
  
    
Balance, beginning of year10,152
 $33.44
    
7,983
 $35.95
    
Granted1,612
 $42.77
    
1,069
 $41.00
    
Exercised(3,697) $32.10
    
(2,795) $34.65
    
Forfeited(47) $38.42
    
(362) $37.31
    
Expired(37) $26.68
    
(212) $36.05
    
Balance, end of year7,983
 $35.95
 4 years $71
5,683
 $37.45
 5 years $42
Options vested or expected to vest at December 31, 20137,308
 $35.99
 4 years $64
Options exercisable at December 31, 20133,976
 $35.38
 1 year $37
Options vested or expected to vest at December 31, 20145,131
 $37.41
 5 years $38
Options exercisable at December 31, 20142,712
 $35.84
 4 years $24
Performance-based stock options 
  
    
 
  
    
Balance, beginning of year6,517
 $32.19
    
5,260
 $32.80
    
Exercised(1,111) $29.27
    
(1,201) $29.46
    
Forfeited(146) $32.40
    
(392) $33.86
    
Balance, end of year5,260
 $32.80
 4 years $63
3,667
 $33.78
 3 years $40
Options vested or expected to vest at December 31, 20134,675
 $32.61
 4 years $57
Options exercisable at December 31, 20132,716
 $31.48
 3 years $36
Options vested or expected to vest at December 31, 20143,376
 $33.64
 3 years $38
Options exercisable at December 31, 20142,829
 $32.81
 3 years $34

(i) 
Certain options are exercisable in pounds sterling and are converted to dollars using the exchange rate at December 31, 20132014.
The weighted average grant-date fair value of time-based options granted during the year ended December 31, 20132014 was $7.745.33 (2013: $7.74; 2012: $6.98; 2011: $9.49). The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 20132014 was $22 million (2013: $32 million (; 2012: $8 million; 2011: $17 million). At December 31, 20132014 there was $2015 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements under time-based stock option plans; that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2 years.
There were no performance-based options granted during the year ended December 31, 20132014. or the year ended December 31, 2013. The weighted average grant-date fair value of performance-based options was $7.61 in the year ended December 31, 2012 (2011: $10.26).2012. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 20132014 was $15 million (2013: $14 million (; 2012: $5 million; 2011: $1 million). At

89

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

4. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

December 31, 20132014 there was $72 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements under performance-based stock option plans; that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1 year.

86

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

4. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

A summary of restricted stock unit activity under the Plans at December 31, 20132014, and changes during the year then ended is presented below:
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
(Units awarded in thousands)Shares Fair ValueShares Fair Value
Nonvested shares (restricted stock units) 
  
 
  
Balance, beginning of year2,525
 $33.80
2,929
 $38.71
Granted1,377
 $44.33
1,750
 $43.03
Vested(874) $34.02
(858) $37.19
Forfeited(99) $33.09
(327) $37.62
Balance, end of year2,929
 $38.71
3,494
 $41.35

The total number of restricted stock units vested during the year ended December 31, 20132014 was857,603 shares at an average share price of $44.09 (2013: 873,670 shares at an average share price of $41.10 (2012: ; 2012: 408,005 shares at an average share price of $35.82)$35.82). At December 31, 20132014 there was $82109 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements under the plan; that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 32 years.
Cash received from option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements for the year ended December 31, 20132014 was $134 million (2013: $155 million (; 2012: $53 million; 2011: $60 million). The actual tax benefit recognized for the tax deductions from option exercises of the share-based payment arrangements totaled $2820 million for the year ended December 31, 20132014 (2013: $28 million; 2012: $8 million; 2011: $18 million).

5.RESTRUCTURING COSTS

In April 2014, the Company announced a multi-year operational improvement program designed to strengthen the Company’s client service capabilities and to deliver future cost savings (hereinafter referred to as the Operational Improvement Program). The main elements of the program, which is expected to be completed by the end of 2017, include the following:

movement of more than 3,500 support roles from higher cost locations to Willis facilities in lower cost locations, bringing the ratio of employees in higher cost versus lower cost near-shore and off-shore centers from approximately 80:20 to approximately 60:40;
net workforce reductions in support positions;
lease consolidation in real estate and reductions in ratios of seats per employee and square footage of floor space per employee; and
information technology systems simplification and rationalization.

The program is expected to deliver cost savings of at least $420 million through 2017 and annual cost savings of $300 million starting 2018. To achieve these cost savings, the company is expecting to incur cumulative costs, including capital expenditure, of approximately $410 million through the end of 2017.

The Company recognized restructuring costs of $36 million in the year ended December 31, 2014, related to its Operational Improvement Program.








87

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc
5. RESTRUCTURING COSTS (Continued)


An analysis of the cost for restructuring recognized in the statement of operations in the year ended December 31, 2014, is as follows:
 Twelve months ended December 31, 2014
 North America International Global Corporate Total
 (millions)
Termination benefits$3
 $3
 $10
 $
 $16
Professional services and other
 2
 1
 17
 20
Total$3
 $5
 $11
 $17
 $36


At December 31, 2014, the Company's liability under the Operational Improvement Program is as follows:

 Termination Benefits Professional Services and other Total
 (millions)
Balance at January 1, 2014$
 $
 $
Charges incurred16
 20
 36
Cash payments(11) (14) (25)
Balance at December 31, 2014$5
 $6
 $11



6.AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION
An analysis of auditors’ remuneration is as follows:
Years ended December 31,Years ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
(millions)(millions)
Audit of group consolidated financial statements$4
 $4
 $4
$5
 $4
 $4
Other assurance services3
 3
 3
2
 3
 3
Other non-audit services1
 1
 1
1
 1
 1
Total auditors’ remuneration$8
 $8
 $8
$8
 $8
 $8


9088

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

6.7.OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET GAIN (LOSS) ON DISPOSAL OF OPERATIONS

A gain on disposal of $2 million is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013. This principally relates to the disposal of an associated undertaking based in Spain.
A loss on disposal of $3 million is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012. This principally relates to the termination of a joint venture arrangement in India.
A gain on disposal of $4 million is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 following conclusionOther income (expense), net consists of the accounting for the Gras Savoye December 2009 leveraged transaction — see Note 15 — 'Investments in Associates'.

91

Table of Contentsfollowing:

Willis Group Holdings plc
 Years ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (millions)
Gain (loss) on disposal of operations$12
 $2
 $(3)
Impact of Venezuelan currency devaluation(14) 
 
Foreign exchange gain8
 20
 19
Other income (expense), net$6
 $22
 $16


7.8.INCOME TAXES
An analysis of income from continuing operations before income taxes and interest in earnings of associates by location of the taxing jurisdiction is as follows:
Years ended December 31,Years ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
(millions)(millions)
Ireland$(52) $(47) $(39)$(65) $(52) $(47)
US(11) (615) (25)
UK282
 25
 (58)
United States92
 (11) (615)
United Kingdom154
 282
 25
Other jurisdictions280
 300
 361
337
 280
 300
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and interest in earnings of associates$499
 $(337) $239
$518
 $499
 $(337)
The provision for income taxes by location of the taxing jurisdiction consisted of the following:
Years ended December 31,Years ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
(millions)(millions)
Current income taxes: 
  
  
 
  
  
US federal tax$7
 $3
 $5
$(16) $7
 $3
US state and local taxes3
 1
 1
7
 3
 1
UK corporation tax28
 2
 (37)29
 28
 2
Other jurisdictions45
 41
 46
73
 45
 41
Total current taxes83
 47
 15
93
 83
 47
Deferred taxes: 
  
  
 
  
  
US federal tax10
 (44) (6)30
 10
 (44)
US state and local taxes1
 (41) 1
10
 1
 (41)
Effect of additional US valuation allowance2
 113
 
Effect of US valuation allowance5
 2
 113
UK corporation tax17
 27
 20
24
 17
 27
Other jurisdictions9
 (1) 2
(3) 9
 (1)
Total deferred taxes39
 54
 17
66
 39
 54
Total income taxes$122
 $101
 $32
$159
 $122
 $101

9289

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statementsWillis Group Holdings plc

7.8. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

The reconciliation between US federal income taxes at the statutory rate and the Company’s provision for income taxes on continuing operations is as follows:
Years ended December 31,Years ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
(millions, except percentages)(millions, except percentages)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and interest in earnings of associates$499
 $(337) $239
$518
 $499
 $(337)
US federal statutory income tax rate35% 35% 35%35% 35% 35%
Income tax expense at US federal tax rate175
 (118) 84
181
 175
 (118)
Adjustments to derive effective rate: 
  
  
 
  
  
Non-deductible expenditure19
 15
 15
21
 19
 15
Tax impact of internal restructurings11
 
 

 11
 
Movement in provision for unrecognized tax benefits(1) 6
 3
1
 (1) 6
Impairment of non-qualifying goodwill
 137
 

 
 137
Disposal of non-qualifying goodwill11
 
 
Impact of change in tax rate on deferred tax balances(4) (3) (3)
 (4) (3)
Adjustment in respect of prior periods1
 6
 (13)(2) 1
 6
Non-deductible Venezuelan foreign exchange loss5
 
 
Effect of foreign exchange and other differences1
 2
 1
(4) 1
 2
Changes in valuation allowances applied to deferred tax assets
 114
 5
7
 
 114
Net tax effect of intra-group items(30) (31) (31)
Adjustments to eliminate the net tax effect of intra-group items(30) (30) (31)
Tax differentials of foreign earnings: 
  
  
 
  
  
Foreign jurisdictions(54) (12) (31)(48) (54) (12)
US state taxes and local taxes4
 (15) 2
17
 4
 (15)
Provision for income taxes$122
 $101
 $32
$159
 $122
 $101

Willis Group Holdings plc is a non-trading holding company tax resident in Ireland where it is taxed at the statutory rate of 25%. The provision for income tax on continuing operations has been reconciled above to the US federal statutory tax rate of 35% due to be consistent with prior periods.significant operations in the US.
The net tax effect of intra-group items principally relates to transactions, the pre-tax effect of which has been eliminated in arriving at the Company’s consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes.



















9390

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plcNotes to the financial statements

7.8. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

The significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities and their balance sheet classifications are as follows:
December 31,December 31,
2013 20122014 2013
(millions)(millions)
Deferred tax assets: 
  
 
  
Accrued expenses not currently deductible$153
 $120
$133
 $153
US state net operating losses70
 64
76
 70
US federal net operating losses
 28
UK net operating losses3
 
1
 3
Other net operating losses5
 8
12
 5
UK capital losses43
 42
39
 43
Accrued retirement benefits47
 101
109
 47
Deferred compensation37
 48
34
 37
Stock options25
 40
22
 25
Gross deferred tax assets383
 451
426
 383
Less: valuation allowance(196) (221)(280) (196)
Net deferred tax assets$187
 $230
$146
 $187
Deferred tax liabilities: 
  
 
  
Cost of intangible assets, net of related amortization$120
 $118
$149
 $120
Cost of tangible assets, net of related amortization44
 51
38
 44
Prepaid retirement benefits56
 35
62
 56
Accrued revenue not currently taxable23
 29
25
 23
Cash retention award
 2
Tax-leasing transactions
 1
Financial derivative transactions3
 2

 3
Deferred tax liabilities246
 238
274
 246
Net deferred tax (liability) asset$(59) $(8)$(128) $(59)

December 31,December 31,
2013 20122014 2013
(millions)(millions)
Balance sheet classifications: 
  
 
  
Current: 
  
 
  
Deferred tax assets$15
 $13
$12
 $15
Deferred tax liabilities(25) (21)(21) (25)
Net current deferred tax liabilities(10) (8)(9) (10)
Non-current: 
  
 
  
Deferred tax assets7
 18
9
 7
Deferred tax liabilities(56) (18)(128) (56)
Net non-current deferred tax liabilities(49) 
(119) (49)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(59) $(8)$(128) $(59)




94

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

7. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

As a result of certain realization requirements of ASC 718 Compensation - Stock Compensation, the tableCompany recognized $8 million of previously unrecognized deferred tax assets and liabilities shown above does not include certain deferred tax assets of $8 million (2012: $nil), that arose directly from tax deductions related to equity compensation greater than compensation recognized for financial reporting. Equity will bewas increased by this $8 million if and when such deferred tax assets are ultimately realized. The Company uses a 'with and without' basis when determining when excess tax benefits have been realized.as of December 31, 2014.


91

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

8. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

At December 31, 20132014, the Company had valuation allowances of $196280 million (20122013: $221196 million) to reduce its deferred tax assets to estimated realizable value. The valuation allowances at December 31, 20132014, relate to deferred tax assets arising from UK capital loss carryforwards ($4339 million) and other net operating losses ($410 million), which have no expiration date, and to the deferred tax assets in the USUnited States ($149231 million). Included within US Federaldeferred tax assets are assets of $76 million in respect of US state net operating losses. These losses will expire between 2028as follows: $8 million from 2015 to 2018, $17 million from 2019 to 2023 and 2032 and US State net operating losses will expire by 2032.$51 million from 2024 to 2034. Capital loss carryforwards can only be offset against future UK capital gains.
Balance at
beginning of year
 
Additions/
(releases)
charged to
costs and expenses
 Other movements 
Foreign
exchange differences
 
Balance
at
end of year
Balance at
beginning of year
 
Additions/
(releases)
charged to
costs and expenses
 Other movements 
Foreign
exchange differences
 
Balance
at
end of year
Description  
(millions)(millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2014 
  
  
  
  
Deferred tax valuation allowance$196
 $17
 $67
 $
 $280
Year Ended December 31, 2013 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Deferred tax valuation allowance$221
 $15
 $(40) $
 $196
221
 15
 (40) 
 196
Year Ended December 31, 2012 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Deferred tax valuation allowance102
 110
 12
 (3) 221
102
 110
 12
 (3) 221
Year Ended December 31, 2011 
  
  
  
  
Deferred tax valuation allowance87
 
 15
 
 102
The amount charged to tax expense in the table above differs from the effect of $nil$7 million disclosed in the rate reconciliation primarily because the movement in this table includes effects of state taxes, which are disclosed separately in the rate reconciliation. The impact of Other movements is primarily recorded in other comprehensive income.
At December 31, 20132014 the Company had deferred tax assets of $187146 million (20122013: $230187 million), net of the valuation allowance. Management believes, based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income, it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the valuation allowance. However, the amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be adjusted in the future if estimates of taxable income are revised.
The Company recognizes deferred tax balances related to the undistributed earnings of subsidiaries when the Company expects that it will recover those undistributed earnings in a taxable manner, such as through receipt of dividends or sale of the investments. The Company does not, however, provide for income taxes on the unremitted earnings of certain other subsidiaries where, in management’s opinion, such earnings have been indefinitely reinvested in those operations, or will be remitted either in a tax free liquidation or as dividends with taxes substantially offset by foreign tax credits. It is not practical to determine the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liabilities for temporary differences related to these investments.
Unrecognized tax benefits
Total unrecognized tax benefits as at December 31, 20132014, totaled $4119 million. During the next 12 months it is reasonably possible that the Company will recognize approximately $1 million of tax benefits related to the release of provisions for potential inter company pricing adjustments no longer required due to either settlement through negotiation or closure of the statute of limitations on assessment.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
 2014 2013 2012
 (millions)
Balance at January 1$41
 $37
 $16
Reductions due to a lapse of the applicable statute of limitation
 (5) (3)
Increases for positions taken in current period5
 9
 8
(Decreases) increases for positions taken in prior periods(26) 
 16
Other movements(1) 
 
Balance at December 31$19
 $41
 $37


9592

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plcNotes to the financial statements

7.8. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

 2013 2012 2011
 (millions)
Balance at January 1$37
 $16
 $13
Reductions due to a lapse of the applicable statute of limitation(5) (3) 
Increases for positions taken in current period9
 8
 
Increases for positions taken in prior periods
 16
 
Other movements
 
 3
Balance at December 31$41
 $37
 $16
$1219 million of the unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 20132014 would, if recognized, favorably affect the effective tax rate in future periods.
The Company files tax returns in the various tax jurisdictions in which it operates. The 2009 US tax year closed in 2013 upon the expiration of the statute of limitations on assessment.returns have been filed timely. Although tax years 2008 and 2009 are closed, the IRS could make adjustments (but not assess additional tax) up to the amount of the net operating losses carried forward from those years. US tax returns have been filed timely. The Company has not extended the federal statute of limitations for assessment in the US.United States for the 2010 year until March 15, 2015.
All UK tax returns have been filed timely and are in the normal process of being reviewed, withby HM Revenue & Customs making inquiries to obtain additional information.Customs. There are no material ongoing inquiries in relation to filed UK returns. In other tax jurisdictions the Company is no longercurrently not subject to any examinations for any year prior to 2004.


8.DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On December 31, 2011, the Company disposed of Global Special Risks, LLC, Faber & Dumas Canada Ltd and the trade and assets of Maclean, Oddy & Associates, Inc.. The gain (net of tax) on this disposal was $2 million.




96

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

9.EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings by the average number of shares outstanding during each period. The computation of diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if dilutive securities and other contracts to issue shares were exercised or converted into shares or resulted in the issue of shares that then shared in the net income of the Company.
In periods where losses are reported the weighted average shares outstanding excludes potentially issuable shares described above, because their inclusion would be antidilutive.anti-dilutive.
For the year ended December 31, 20132014, time-based and performance-based options to purchase 5.7 million and 3.7 million shares (2013: 8.0 million and 5.3 million shares (; 2012: 10.2 million and 6.5 million; 2011: 9.2 million and 7.3 million), respectively, and 2.93.5 million restricted stock units (2013: 2.9 million; 2012: 2.5 million; 2011: 1.2 million) were outstanding.
Basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
Years ended December 31,Years ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
(millions, except per share data)(millions, except per share data)
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings$365
 $(446) $204
$362
 $365
 $(446)
Basic average number of shares outstanding176
 173
 173
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding178
 176
 173
Dilutive effect of potentially issuable shares3
 
 3
3
 3
 
Diluted average number of shares outstanding179
 173
 176
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding181
 179
 173
Basic earnings per share: 
  
  
 
  
  
Continuing operations$2.07
 $(2.58) $1.17
Discontinued operations
 
 0.01
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings shareholders$2.07
 $(2.58) $1.18
$2.03
 $2.07
 $(2.58)
Dilutive effect of potentially issuable shares(0.03) 
 (0.02)(0.03) (0.03) 
Diluted earnings per share: 
  
  
 
  
  
Continuing operations$2.04
 $(2.58) $1.15
Discontinued operations
 
 0.01
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings shareholders$2.04
 $(2.58) $1.16
$2.00
 $2.04
 $(2.58)
Options to purchase 2.12.4 million shares and 1.31.5 million restricted stock units for the year ended December 31, 20132014, were not included in the computation of the dilutive effect of stock options because the effect was antidilutive (2013: 2.1 million shares and 1.3 million restricted stock units; 2012: 16.7 million shares and 2.5 million restricted stock units; 2011: 4.1 million shares)units).


93

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


10.ACQUISITIONS

During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 we made the following material acquisitions in line with our strategy to invest in targeted acquisitions with a focus on earnings accretion, competitive position, and fit.
Max Matthiessen Holding AB
In firstthe fourth quarter 2013,of 2014, the Company acquired 75.8 percent of Max Matthiessen Holding AB and subsidiaries (collectively referred to as Max Matthiessen), a leading employee benefits adviser in Sweden, for cash consideration of $204 million.
On acquisition the Company recognized acquired intangible assets of $134 million of which $56 million was in relation to client relationships and $76 million was in relation to fund management contracts, which are being amortized over 12 years and 18 years respectively. The remaining $2 million of intangible assets relate to the Max Matthiessen trade name and is being amortized over 4 years.
Goodwill of $139 million was recognized on the transaction.
Charles Monat Limited
In the second quarter of 2014, the Company acquired 100 percent of CBC Broker Srl,Charles Monat Limited and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as Charles Monat), a life insurance solutions adviser to high net worth clients based in Hong Kong, for cash consideration of $59 million.
Additional consideration estimated at $29 million is payable in annual installments over the next 5 years, based on a multiple of EBITDA of the entities acquired, during the period from May 25, 2014 until September 2, 2019. This consideration has been assessed to have a fair value of $12 million at the date of acquisition.
On acquisition the Company recognized acquired intangible assets of $35 million of which $27 million was in respect of client relationships, which are being amortized over an Italian broker, at a costexpected life of $1 million.11 years. The remaining $8 million of intangible assets relate to carrier relationships and trade names and are both being amortized over 5 years.
Goodwill of $31 million was recognized on the transaction.
Prime Professions Ltd
In second quarter 2013, the Company acquired 100 percent of PPH Limited and its subsidiary Prime Professions Limited (together referred to as Prime Professions), a leading UK based professional indemnity insurance broker, for cash consideration of $29 million. Additional consideration of up to approximately $2 million is payable in 2015 based on the achievement of certain revenue targets.
In relation to the acquisition of Prime Professions, the Company recognized acquired intangible assets of $17 million of which $16 million was in respect of customerclient relationships, which are being amortized over an expected life of 15 years. The remaining intangible assets relate to non-compete agreements and the Prime trade name which are being amortized over 8 years and 3 years, respectively.
Goodwill of $15 million was recognized on the transaction.
OnThe aggregate costs incurred related to the above acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 20122014 was $3 million (2013: $1 million)
In addition to the above acquisitions, the Company acquired Avalon Actuarial Inc.,completed a Canadian actuarial consulting firmnumber of smaller acquisitions during 2014 for cashaggregated consideration of $25 million. Additional consideration of up to approximately $5$27 million is payable in 2016 based on the achievement of certain revenue targets.
In relation to the acquisition of Avalon Actuarial, the Company recognized acquiredand consequently recognised intangible assets of $20$16 million and goodwill of which $17 million was in respect of customer relationships, which are being amortized over an expected life of 14 years. The remaining intangible assets relate to non-compete agreements and the Avalon trade name which are being amortized over 5 years and 3 years, respectively. Goodwill of $9 million was recognized on the transaction.$14 million.



94

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

11.FIDUCIARY ASSETS
The Company collects premiums from insureds and, after deducting its commissions, remits the premiums to the respective insurers; the Company also collects claims or refunds from insurers which it then remits to insureds. Uncollected premiums

97

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


from insureds and uncollected claims or refunds from insurers (‘fiduciary receivables’) are recorded as fiduciary assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Unremitted insurance premiums, claims or refunds (‘fiduciary funds’) are also recorded within fiduciary assets.
Fiduciary assets therefore comprise both receivables and funds held in a fiduciary capacity.
Fiduciary funds, consisting primarily of time deposits with original maturities of less than or equal to three months, were $1,662 million as of December 31, 2013 (2012: $1,796 million). Accrued interest on funds is recorded as other assets.

12.FIXED ASSETS, NET
An analysis of fixed asset activity for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 are as follows:
Land and
buildings (i)
 
Leasehold
improvements
 
Furniture and
equipment
 Total
Land and
buildings (i)
 
Leasehold
improvements
 
Furniture and
equipment
 Total
(millions)(millions)
Cost: at January 1, 2012$73
 $210
 $509
 $792
Additions3
 16
 116
 135
Disposals
 (4) (59) (63)
Foreign exchange2
 5
 10
 17
Cost: at December 31, 201278
 227
 576
 881
Cost: at January 1, 2013$78
 $227
 $576
 $881
Additions10
 22
 80
 112
10
 22
 80
 112
Disposals
 (7) (43) (50)
 (7) (43) (50)
Foreign exchange1
 
 5
 6
1
 
 5
 6
Cost: at December 31, 2013$89
 $242
 $618
 $949
89
 242
 618
 949
       
Depreciation: at January 1, 2012$(28) $(61) $(297) $(386)
Depreciation expense provided(3) (17) (59) (79)
Additions7
 25
 84
 116
Disposals
 4
 56
 60

 (12) (29) (41)
Foreign exchange(1) (1) (6) (8)(3) (10) (31) (44)
Depreciation: at December 31, 2012(32) (75) (306) (413)
Cost: at December 31, 2014$93
 $245
 $642
 $980
       
Depreciation: at January 1, 2013$(32) $(75) $(306) $(413)
Depreciation expense provided(3) (18) (73) (94)(3) (18) (73) (94)
Disposals
 6
 36
 42

 6
 36
 42
Foreign exchange(1) 
 (2) (3)(1) 
 (2) (3)
Depreciation: at December 31, 2013$(36) $(87) $(345) $(468)(36) (87) (345) (468)
Depreciation expense provided(4) (20) (68) (92)
Disposals
 10
 28
 38
Foreign exchange2
 4
 19
 25
Depreciation: at December 31, 2014$(38) $(93) $(366) $(497)
Net book value: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
At December 31, 2012$46
 $152
 $270
 $468
At December 31, 2013$53
 $155
 $273
 $481
              
At December 31, 2013$53
 $155
 $273
 $481
At December 31, 2014$55
 $152
 $276
 $483

(i) 
Included within land and buildings are assets held under capital leases: At December 31, 20132014, cost and accumulated depreciation were$32 million and $8 million respectively (2013: $31 million and $6 million respectively (, respectively; 2012: $25 million and $4 million, respectively; 2011: $23$25 million and $2$4 million respectively). Depreciation in the year ended December 31, 20132014 was $2 million (20122013: $12 million; 20112012: $1 million).



9895

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

13.12.GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of businesses acquired over the fair value of identifiable net assets at the dates of acquisition. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to impairment testing annually and whenever facts or circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
The Company has determined that its reporting units are consistent with its operating segments: North America; International and Global. Goodwill is allocated to these reporting units based on the original purchase price allocation for acquisitions within the reporting units. When a business entity is sold, goodwill is allocated to the disposed entity based on the fair value of that entity compared to the fair value of the reporting unit in which it is included.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segmentreporting unit for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 20122013, are as follows:
Global 
North
America
 International TotalGlobal 
North
America
 International Total
(millions)(millions)
Balance at January 1, 2012       
Balance at January 1, 2013       
Goodwill, gross$1,122
 $1,782
 $391
 $3,295
$1,127
 $1,792
 $400
 $3,319
Accumulated impairment losses
 
 
 

 (492) 
 (492)
Goodwill, net1,122
 1,782
 391
 3,295
1,127
 1,300
 400
 2,827
Purchase price allocation adjustments
 
 2
 2

 (1) 
 (1)
Goodwill acquired during the year
 10
 2
 12
15
 
 1
 16
Goodwill disposed of during the year
 
 (1) (1)
 (14) 
 (14)
Goodwill impairment charge
 (492) 
 (492)
Other movements
 (1) 
 (1)
Foreign exchange5
 
 6
 11
3
 
 8
 11
Balance at December 31, 2012       
Balance at December 31, 2013       
Goodwill, gross1,127
 1,792
 400
 3,319
1,145
 1,776
 409
 3,330
Accumulated impairment losses
 (492) 
 (492)
 (492) 
 (492)
Goodwill, net$1,127
 $1,300
 $400
 $2,827
$1,145
 $1,284
 $409
 $2,838
Purchase price allocation adjustments
 (1) 
 (1)3
 3
 7
 13
Goodwill acquired during the year15
 
 1
 16
5
 
 179
 184
Goodwill disposed of during the year
 (14) 
 (14)
 (48) 
 (48)
Other movements (i)

 (1) 
 (1)88
 (45) (43) 
Foreign exchange3
 
 8
 11
(7) 
 (43) (50)
Balance at December 31, 2013       
Balance at December 31, 2014       
Goodwill, gross1,145
 1,776
 409
 3,330
1,234
 1,686
 509
 3,429
Accumulated impairment losses
 (492) 
 (492)
 (492) 
 (492)
Goodwill, net$1,145
 $1,284
 $409
 $2,838
$1,234
 $1,194
 $509
 $2,937

(i) 
Effective January 1, 2014, the Company changed its internal reporting structure: UK Retail, previously reported within the International segment, is now reported within the Global segment; Mexico Retail, which was previously reported within the North America $1 million (2012: $nil) tax benefit arising onsegment, is now reported in the exerciseInternational segment; and the US captive consulting and facultative reinsurance businesses, both previously reported within the North America segment, are now reported within the Global segment. As a consequence of fully vested HRH stock options which were issued as part ofthese changes goodwill has been reallocated between reporting units using the acquisition of HRH in 2008.relative fair value allocation approach.

Impairment Review
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually.annually, or whenever events of circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. In the first step of the impairment test, the fair value of each reporting unit is compared with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the amount of an impairment loss, if any, is

96

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

12. GOODWILL (Continued)

calculated in the second step of the impairment test by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill.
The Company's goodwill impairment test for 20132014 has not resulted in an impairment charge (2013: $nil; 2012: $492 million; 2011: $nil).
In 2012, as a consequence of the Company's annual goodwill impairment test performed as of October 1, 2012, the Company concluded that ana pre-tax impairment charge of $492 million was required to reduce the carrying value of the goodwill associated with the Company's North America reporting unit.unit from $1,782 million to its implied fair value of $1,290 million. The goodwill impairment charge forCompany used the North America reporting

99

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

13. GOODWILL (Continued)

unit amountedincome approach to $492 million. There was no impairment for the Global and International reporting units, as the fair values of these units were significantly in excess of their carrying value.
The decline inmeasure the fair value of the North America reporting unit, as well as differences between fair values and carrying values for other assets and liabilities inwhich involved calculating the second step of the goodwill impairment test, resulted in an implied fair value of goodwill substantially below the carryingreporting unit based on the present value of the goodwillestimated future cash flows. Cash flow projections were based on management's estimates of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions and the uncertainty related to the business's ability to execute on the projected cash flows. The discount rate used was based on the weighted-average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with market participant expectations of characteristics of the reporting unit. As a result,The unobservable inputs included projected revenue growth rates, profitability and the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $492 million as of October 1, 2012.
As previously disclosed,market participant assumptions within the North America reporting unit had been hampered by the declining Loan Protector business results, the effect of the soft economy in the U.S., which had significantly impacted the Construction and Human Capital sectors, and declining retention rates primarily related to merger and acquisition activity and lost legacy HRH businesses.
discount rate. The decline in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit resulted from lower projected revenue growth rates and profitability levels as well as an increase in the discount rate used to calculate the discounted cash flows. The increase in the discount rate was due to increases in the risk-free rate and small company premium offset byAs a reduction to the expected market rate of return. The lower projected profitability levels reflected changes in assumptions related to organic revenue growth and cost rates which could be attributed to the declines discussed above and also included considerationconsequence of the uncertainty related tosignificance of unobservable inputs developed using company-specific information, the business's ability to execute on the projected cash flows.

re-measurement of goodwill for this reporting unit is classified as a non-recurring level 3 fair value assessment.

14.13.OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Other intangible assets are classified into the following categories:
'Customer and Marketing Related',Client Relationships
Management Contracts
Other, including:
client relationships
client lists
non-compete agreements
trade names
‘Contractcontract based, Technologytechnology and Other’ includes all other purchased intangible assets.
The major classes of amortizable intangible assets are as follows:
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
 
Gross carrying
amount
 
Accumulated
amortization
 Net carrying amount 
Gross carrying
amount
 
Accumulated
amortization
 Net carrying amount
 (millions)
Customer and Marketing Related: 
  
  
  
  
  
Client Relationships$671
 $(326) $345
 $717
 $(340) $377
Client Lists3
 (1) 2
 3
 (1) 2
Non-compete Agreements4
 (1) 3
 3
 
 3
Trade Names2
 (1) 1
 11
 (10) 1
Total Customer and Marketing Related680
 (329) 351
 734
 (351) 383
Contract based, Technology and Other5
 (3) 2
 4
 (2) 2
Total amortizable intangible assets$685
 $(332) $353
 $738
 $(353) $385
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
 
Gross carrying
amount
 
Accumulated
amortization
 Net carrying amount 
Gross carrying
amount
 
Accumulated
amortization
 Net carrying amount
 (millions)
Client relationships$689
 $(316) $373
 $671
 $(326) $345
Management contracts71
 (1) 70
 
 
 
Other11
 (4) 7
 14
 (6) 8
Total amortizable intangible assets$771
 $(321) $450
 $685
 $(332) $353

100

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements
14. OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET (Continued)

The aggregate amortization of intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 20132014 was $54 million (2013: $55 million (; 2012: $59 million; 2011: $68 million). The estimated aggregate amortization of intangible assets for each of the next five years ended December 31 is as follows:
(millions)(millions)
2014$50
201543
$57
201638
51
201733
46
201829
41
201937
Thereafter160
218
Total$353
$450



97

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


14.OTHER ASSETS
An analysis of other assets is as follows:
 December 31,
 2014 2013
 (millions)
Other current assets   
Prepayments and accrued income$81
 $73
Income taxes receivable30
 32
Deferred compensation plan assets17
 26
Other receivables86
 66
Total other current assets$214
 $197
Other non-current assets 
  
Deferred compensation plan assets$92
 $88
Income taxes receivable
 21
Accounts receivable, net29
 28
Other investments29
 19
Other receivables70
 50
Total other non-current assets$220
 $206
Total other assets$434
 $403

15.INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATESOTHER LIABILITIES
The Company holds a numberAn analysis of investments which it accounts for using the equity method. The Company’s approximate interest in the outstanding stock of the more significant associatesother liabilities is as follows:
   December 31,
 Country 2013 2012
Al-Futtaim Willis Co. L.L.C. Dubai 49% 49%
GS & Cie GroupeFrance 30% 30%
The Company’s principal investment as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 is GS & Cie Groupe (‘Gras Savoye’), France’s leading insurance broker.
The Company’s original investment in Gras Savoye was made in 1997, when it acquired a 33 percent ownership interest. Between 1997 and December 2009 this interest was increased by a series of incremental investments to 49 percent.
On December 17, 2009, the Company completed a leveraged transaction with the original family shareholders of Gras Savoye and Astorg Partners, a private equity fund, to reorganize the capital of Gras Savoye (‘December 2009 leveraged transaction’). The Company, the original family shareholders and Astorg now own equal stakes of 30 percent in the capital structure of Gras Savoye and have equal representation of one third of the voting rights on its board. The remaining shareholding is held by a large pool of Gras Savoye managers and minority shareholders.
A put option that was in place prior to the December 2009 leveraged transaction, and which could have increased the Company’s interest to 90 percent, has been amended and the Company now has a call option to purchase 100 percent of the capital of Gras Savoye. If the Company does not waive the call option before April 30, 2015, then it must exercise the call option in 2016 or the other shareholders may initiate procedures to sell Gras Savoye. Except with the unanimous consent of the supervisory board and other customary exceptions, the parties are prohibited from transferring any shares of Gras Savoye until 2016. At the end of this period, shareholders are entitled to pre-emptive and tag-along rights.
In 2011 the Company’s ownership of Gras Savoye reduced from 31 percent to 30 percent following issuance of additional share capital as part of an employee share incentive scheme.
The carrying amount of the Gras Savoye investment as of December 31, 2013 includes goodwill of $84 million (2012: $83 million) and interest bearing vendor loans and convertible bonds issued by Gras Savoye of $46 million and $110 million respectively (2012: $47 million and $96 million, respectively).
A gain of $4 million was recorded in 2011 following conclusion of the accounting for the December 2009 leveraged transaction.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s other investments in associates, individually and in the aggregate, were not material to the Company’s operations.

101

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc
15. INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES (Continued)


Condensed financial information for associates, in the aggregate, as of and for the three years ended December 31, 2013, is presented below. For convenience purposes: (i) balance sheet data has been translated to US dollars at the relevant year-end exchange rate, and (ii) condensed statements of operations data has been translated to US dollars at the relevant average exchange rate.
 2013 2012 2011
 (millions)
Condensed statements of operations data (i):
 
  
  
Total revenues$502
 $497
 $527
(Loss) income before income taxes(48) (17) 5
Net loss(36) (14) (2)
Condensed balance sheets data (i):
 
  
  
Total assets1,685
 1,670
 1,882
Total liabilities1,611
 1,559
 1,736
Stockholders’ equity74
 111
 146

(i)
Disclosure is based on the Company’s best estimate of the results of its associates and is subject to change upon receipt of their financial statements for 2013.
For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized $3 million (2012: $3 million; 2011: $4 million) in respect of dividends received from associates.
 December 31,
 2014 2013
 (millions)
Other current liabilities 
  
Accounts payable$131
 $123
Accrued dividends payable55
 51
Other taxes payable44
 51
Deferred compensation plan liability17
 26
Other payables197
 164
Total other current liabilities$444
 $415
Other non-current liabilities 
  
Incentives from lessors$171
 $183
Deferred compensation plan liability92
 89
Contingent or deferred consideration on acquisition26
 13
Accounts payable14
 6
Income taxes payable15
 40
Other payables71
 43
Total other non-current liabilities$389
 $374
Total other liabilities$833
 $789


10298

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

16.OTHER ASSETS
An analysis of other assets is as follows:
 December 31,
 2013 2012
 (millions)
Other current assets   
Prepayments and accrued income$73
 $61
Income taxes receivable32
 50
Deferred compensation plan assets26
 12
Other receivables66
 58
Total other current assets$197
 $181
Other non-current assets 
  
Prepayments and accrued income16
 24
Deferred compensation plan assets88
 97
Income taxes receivable21
 12
Accounts receivable, net28
 25
Other investments19
 12
Other receivables34
 36
Total other non-current assets$206
 $206
Total other assets$403
 $387

17.OTHER LIABILITIES
An analysis of other liabilities is as follows:
 December 31,
 2013 2012
 (millions)
Other current liabilities 
  
Accounts payable$123
 $88
Accrued dividends payable51
 47
Other taxes payable51
 44
Deferred compensation plan liability26
 12
Incentives from lessors12
 9
Other payables152
 127
Total other current liabilities$415
 $327
Other non-current liabilities 
  
Incentives from lessors$183
 $173
Deferred compensation plan liability89
 101
Income taxes payable40
 33
Other payables62
 68
Total other non-current liabilities$374
 $375
Total other liabilities$789
 $702


103

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


18.ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Accounts receivable are stated at estimated net realizable values. The allowances shown below as at the end of each period, are recorded as the amounts considered by management to be sufficient to meet probable future losses related to uncollectible accounts.
Balance at
beginning of year
 
Additions/
(releases)
charged to
costs and expenses
 
Deductions
/ Other movements
 
Foreign
exchange differences
 
Balance at
end of year
Balance at
beginning of year
 
Additions/
(releases)
charged to
costs and expenses
 
Deductions
/ Other movements
 
Foreign
exchange differences
 
Balance at
end of year
Description                  
(millions)(millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2014 
  
  
  
  
Allowance for doubtful accounts$13
 $4
 $(6) $1
 $12
Year Ended December 31, 2013 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Allowance for doubtful accounts$14
 $3
 $(4) $
 $13
$14
 $3
 $(4) $
 $13
Year Ended December 31, 2012 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Allowance for doubtful accounts$13
 $16
 $(15) $
 $14
$13
 $16
 $(15) $
 $14
Year Ended December 31, 2011 
  
  
  
  
Allowance for doubtful accounts$12
 $4
 $(3) $
 $13


104

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

19.17.PENSION PLANS
The Company maintains two principal defined benefit pension plans that cover approximately half of ourthe Company's employees in the United States and United Kingdom. Both of these plans are now closed to new entrants and with effect from May 15, 2009, the Company closed the US defined benefit plan to future accrual. New employees in the United Kingdom are offered the opportunity to join a defined contribution plan and in the United States are offered the opportunity to join a 401(k) plan. In addition to the Company’s UK and US defined benefit pension plans, the Company has several smaller defined benefit pension plans in certain other countries in which it operates including a US non-qualified plan and an unfunded plan in the UK. Elsewhere, pension benefits are typically provided through defined contribution plans. It is the Company’s policy to fund pension costs as required by applicable laws and regulations.
At December 31, 20132014, the Company recorded, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:

a pension benefit asset of $278314 million (20122013: $136278 million) representing:

$276314 million (20122013: $134276 million) in respect of the UK defined benefit pension plan; and

$2 millionnil (20122013: $2 million) in respect of the international defined benefit pension plans.

a total liability for pension benefits of $136284 million (20122013: $282136 million) representing:

$107245 million (20122013: $250107 million) in respect of the US defined benefit pension plan; and

$2939 million (20122013: $3229 million) in respect of the international, US non-qualified and UK unfunded defined benefit pension plans.

10599

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

19.17. PENSION PLANS (Continued)

UK and US defined benefit plans
The following schedules provide information concerning the Company’s UK and US defined benefit pension plans as of and for the years ended December 31:
UK Pension Benefits US Pension BenefitsUK Pension Benefits US Pension Benefits
2013 2012 2013 20122014 2013 2014 2013
(millions)(millions)
Change in benefit obligation: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Benefit obligation, beginning of year$2,582
 $2,217
 $958
 $895
$2,785
 $2,582
 $864
 $958
Service cost37
 35
 
 
41
 37
 
 
Interest cost109
 108
 38
 41
121
 109
 40
 38
Employee contributions2
 2
 
 
2
 2
 
 
Actuarial loss (gain)79
 186
 (81) 71
390
 79
 183
 (81)
Curtailment gain(2) 
 
 
Benefits paid(78) (77) (51) (49)(85) (78) (36) (51)
Foreign currency changes54
 111
 
 
(168) 54
 
 
Benefit obligations, end of year2,785
 2,582
 864
 958
3,084
 2,785
 1,051
 864
Change in plan assets: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year2,716
 2,353
 708
 637
3,061
 2,716
 757
 708
Actual return on plan assets255
 226
 60
 80
520
 255
 65
 60
Employee contributions2
 2
 
 
2
 2
 
 
Employer contributions100
 92
 40
 40
91
 100
 20
 40
Benefits paid(78) (77) (51) (49)(85) (78) (36) (51)
Foreign currency changes66
 120
 
 
(191) 66
 
 
Fair value of plan assets, end of year3,061
 2,716
 757
 708
3,398
 3,061
 806
 757
Funded status at end of year$276
 $134
 $(107) $(250)$314
 $276
 $(245) $(107)
Components on the Consolidated Balance Sheets: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Pension benefits asset$276
 $134
 $
 $
$314
 $276
 $
 $
Liability for pension benefits
 
 (107) (250)
 
 (245) (107)

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of:
UK Pension Benefits US Pension BenefitsUK Pension Benefits US Pension Benefits
2013 2012 2013 20122014 2013 2014 2013
  (millions)    (millions)  
Net actuarial loss$815
 $831
 $233
 $332
$809
 $815
 $399
 $233
Prior service gain(24) (29) 
 
(20) (24) 
 
The accumulated benefit obligations for the Company’s UK and US defined benefit pension plans were $3,017 million and $1,051 million, respectively (2013: $2,701 million and $864 million, respectively (2012: $2,519 million and $958 million, respectively).

106100

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

19.17. PENSION PLANS (Continued)

The components of the net periodic benefit (income) cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive loss for the UK and US defined benefit plans are as follows:
Years ended December 31,Years ended December 31,
UK Pension Benefits US Pension BenefitsUK Pension Benefits US Pension Benefits
2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012
    (millions)        (millions)    
Components of net periodic benefit (income) cost: 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Service cost$37
 $35
 $36
 $
 $
 $
$41
 $37
 $35
 $
 $
 $
Interest cost109
 108
 106
 38
 41
 41
121
 109
 108
 40
 38
 41
Expected return on plan assets(191) (181) (161) (51) (46) (44)(213) (191) (181) (54) (51) (46)
Amortization of unrecognized prior service gain(5) (6) (5) 
 
 
Amortization of unrecognized prior service gain and curtailment gain(4) (5) (6) 
 
 
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss45
 39
 30
 9
 8
 3
42
 45
 39
 6
 9
 8
Net periodic benefit (income) cost$(5) $(5) $6
 $(4) $3
 $
$(13) $(5) $(5) $(8) $(4) $3
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss): 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Net actuarial loss (gain)$15
 $141
 $164
 $(90) $37
 $137
$83
 $15
 $141
 $172
 $(90) $37
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss(45) (39) (30) (9) (8) (3)(42) (45) (39) (6) (9) (8)
Prior service gain
 
 (10) 
 
 
Amortization of unrecognized prior service gain5
 6
 5
 
 
 
Amortization of unrecognized prior service gain and curtailment gain4
 5
 6
 
 
 
Curtailment gain(2) 
 
 
 
 
Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)$(25) $108
 $129
 $(99) $29
 $134
$43
 $(25) $108
 $166
 $(99) $29
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$(30) $103
 $135
 $(103) $32
 $134
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income (loss)$30
 $(30) $103
 $158
 $(103) $32

The estimated net loss and prior service cost for the UK and US defined benefit plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are:
UK Pension
Benefits
 
US Pension
Benefits
UK Pension
Benefits
 
US Pension
Benefits
(millions)(millions)
Estimated net loss$42
 $6
$39
 $11
Prior service gain(3) 
(3) 


107101

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

19.17. PENSION PLANS (Continued)

The following schedule provides other information concerning the Company’s UK and US defined benefit pension plans:
Years ended December 31,Years ended December 31,
UK Pension Benefits US Pension BenefitsUK Pension Benefits US Pension Benefits
2013 2012 2013 20122014 2013 2014 2013
Weighted-average assumptions to determine benefit obligations: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Discount rate4.4% 4.4% 4.8% 4.1%3.6% 4.4% 3.9% 4.8%
Rate of compensation increase3.2% 2.3% N/A
 N/A
2.9% 3.2% N/A
 N/A
Weighted-average assumptions to determine net periodic benefit cost: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Discount rate4.4% 4.8% 4.1% 4.6%4.4% 4.4% 4.8% 4.1%
Expected return on plan assets7.3% 7.5% 7.3% 7.3%7.0% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3%
Rate of compensation increase2.3% 2.1% N/A
 N/A
3.2% 2.3% N/A
 N/A
The expected return on plan assets was determined on the basis of the weighted-average of the expected future returns of the various asset classes, using the target allocations shown below. The expected returns on UK plan assets are: UK and foreign equities 9.278.86 percent, debt securities 4.424.38 percent, hedge funds 7.868.38 percent and real estate 6.53 percent. The expected returns on US plan assets are: US and foreign equities 10.4011.0 percent and debt securities 4.103.6 percent.
The Company’s pension plan asset allocations based on fair values were as follows:
 Years ended December 31, Years ended December 31,
 UK Pension Benefits US Pension Benefits UK Pension Benefits US Pension Benefits
Asset Category 2013 2012 2013 2012 2014 2013 2014 2013
Equity securities 36% 41% 52% 49% 34% 36% 48% 52%
Debt securities 38% 37% 46% 50% 45% 38% 49% 46%
Hedge funds 17% 17% % % 14% 17% % %
Real estate 3% 3% % % 3% 3% % %
Cash 6% 2% % % 4% 6% % %
Other % % 2% 1% % % 3% 2%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

In the UKUnited Kingdom, the pension trustees, in consultation with the Company, maintain a diversified asset portfolio and this together with contributions made by the Company is expected to meet the pension scheme’s liabilities as they become due. The UK plan’s assets are divided into 13 separate portfolios according to asset class and managed by 10 investment managers. The broad target allocations are UK and foreign equities (31.536.5 percent), debt securities (4543.5 percent), hedge funds (17.515 percent) and real estate (65 percent). In the USUnited States, the Company’s investment policy is to maintain a diversified asset portfolio, which together with contributions made by the Company is expected to meet the pension scheme’s liabilities as they become due. The US plan’s assets are currently invested in 1718 funds representing most standard equity and debt security classes. The broad target allocations are US and foreign equities (50 percent) and debt securities (50 percent).
Fair Value Hierarchy
The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value:
Level 1: refers to fair values determined based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets;
Level 2: refers to fair values estimated using observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data; and
Level 3: includes fair values estimated using unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

108102

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

19.17. PENSION PLANS (Continued)

The following tables present, at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, the Company’s UK pension plan assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
 UK Pension Plan UK Pension Plan
December 31, 2013 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
December 31, 2014 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
   (millions)     (millions)  
Equity securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US equities $659
 $81
 $
 $740
 $565
 $185
 $
 $750
UK equities 239
 17
 
 256
 234
 15
 
 249
Other equities 40
 63
 
 103
 26
 124
 
 150
Fixed income securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US Government bonds 31
 
 
 31
 81
 2
 
 83
UK Government bonds 656
 
 
 656
 783
 6
 
 789
Other Government bonds 7
 
 100
 107
 3
 3
 99
 105
UK corporate bonds 75
 
 
 75
 
 103
 
 103
Other corporate bonds 151
 
 
 151
 113
 33
 
 146
Derivatives 
 154
 
 154
 
 293
 
 293
Real estate 
 
 92
 92
 
 
 124
 124
Cash 163
 
 
 163
Cash and cash equivalents 124
 13
 
 137
Other investments:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Hedge funds 
 28
 477
 505
 
 
 487
 487
Other 
 28
 
 28
 
 (18) 
 (18)
Total $2,021
 $371
 $669
 $3,061
 $1,929
 $759
 $710
 $3,398

 UK Pension Plan UK Pension Plan
December 31, 2012 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
December 31, 2013 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
   (millions)     (millions)  
Equity securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US equities $492
 $108
 $
 $600
 $659
 $81
 $
 $740
UK equities 317
 59
 
 376
 239
 17
 
 256
Other equities 28
 97
 
 125
 40
 63
 
 103
Fixed income securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US Government bonds 11
 
 
 11
 31
 
 
 31
UK Government bonds 625
 
 
 625
 656
 
 
 656
Other Government bonds 13
 
 
 13
 7
 
 100
 107
UK corporate bonds 112
 
 
 112
 75
 
 
 75
Other corporate bonds 29
 
 
 29
 151
 
 
 151
Derivatives 
 217
 
 217
 
 154
 
 154
Real estate 
 
 76
 76
 
 
 92
 92
Cash 53
 
 
 53
Cash and cash equivalents 163
 
 
 163
Other investments:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Hedge funds 
 27
 431
 458
 
 28
 477
 505
Other 8
 13
 
 21
 
 28
 
 28
Total $1,688
 $521
 $507
 $2,716
 $2,021
 $371
 $669
 $3,061

109103

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

19.17. PENSION PLANS (Continued)

The UK plan’s real estate investment comprises UK property and infrastructure investments which are valued by the fund manager taking into account cost, independent appraisals and market based comparable data. The UK plan’s hedge fund investments are primarily invested in various ‘fund of funds’ and are valued based on net asset values calculated by the fund and are not publicly available. Liquidity is typically monthly and is subject to liquidity of the underlying funds. The UK plan’s Other Government Bonds investments are primarily invested in investment-grade emerging and developed market government bonds. Funds are valued on a net asset value basis, with the underlying bond instruments being valued using bid-side, clean pricing from approved pricing vendors. Prices are not publicly available.
The following tables present, at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, the Company’s US pension plan assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
 US Pension Plan US Pension Plan
December 31, 2013 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
December 31, 2014 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
   (millions)     (millions)  
Equity securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US equities $120
 $125
 $
 $245
 $115
 $117
 $
 $232
Non US equities 116
 33
 
 149
 110
 44
 
 154
Fixed income securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US Government bonds 
 55
 
 55
 
 72
 
 72
US corporate bonds 
 151
 
 151
 
 171
 
 171
International fixed income securities 58
 42
 
 100
 59
 42
 
 101
Municipal & Non US government bonds 
 30
 
 30
 
 32
 
 32
Other investments:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Mortgage backed securities 
 12
 
 12
 
 16
 
 16
Other 9
 6
 
 15
 20
 8
 
 28
Total $303
 $454
 $
 $757
 $304
 $502
 $
 $806

 US Pension Plan US Pension Plan
December 31, 2012 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
December 31, 2013 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
   (millions)     (millions)  
Equity securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US equities $144
 $78
 $
 $222
 $120
 $125
 $
 $245
Non US equities 98
 27
 
 125
 116
 33
 
 149
Fixed income securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US Government bonds 
 69
 
 69
 
 55
 
 55
US corporate bonds 
 144
 
 144
 
 151
 
 151
International fixed income securities 52
 39
 
 91
 58
 42
 
 100
Municipal & Non US government bonds 
 35
 
 35
 
 30
 
 30
Other investments:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Mortgage backed securities 
 13
 
 13
 
 12
 
 12
Other 3
 6
 
 9
 9
 6
 
 15
Total $297
 $411
 $
 $708
 $303
 $454
 $
 $757




104

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

17. PENSION PLANS (Continued)

Equity securities comprise:
common stockordinary shares and preferred stockshares which are valued using quoted market prices; and
pooled investment vehicles which are valued at their net asset values as calculated by the investment manager and typically have daily or weekly liquidity.
Fixed income securities comprise US, UK and other Government Treasury Bills, loan stock, index linked loan stock and UK and other corporate bonds which are typically valued using quoted market prices.

110

Table Certain of Contentsthese investments are classified as Level 2 investments on the basis that the assets are valued at their net asset values calculated by the investment manager and liquidity is not daily.

Notes to the financial statementsLevel 3 investments

19. PENSION PLANS (Continued)

As a result of the inherent limitations related to the valuations of the Level 3 investments, due to the unobservable inputs of the underlying funds, the estimated fair value may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a market for those investments existed.
The following table summarizes the changes in the UK pension plan’s Level 3 assets for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 20122013:
UK PensionUK Pension
PlanPlan
Level 3Level 3
(millions)(millions)
Balance at January 1, 2012$476
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net(2)
Unrealized and realized gains relating to instruments still held at end of year17
Foreign exchange16
Balance at December 31, 2012$507
Balance at January 1, 2013$507
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net121
121
Unrealized and realized gains relating to instruments still held at end of year29
29
Foreign exchange12
12
Balance at December 31, 2013$669
$669
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net40
Unrealized and realized gains relating to instruments still held at end of year24
Foreign exchange(23)
Balance at December 31, 2014$710

In 20142015, the Company expects to make contributions to the UK plan of approximately $8396 million and $3010 million to the US plan. In addition, approximately $1210 million will be paid in 20142015 into the UK defined benefit plan related to employee's salary sacrifice contributions.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are estimated to be paid by the UK and US defined benefit pension plans:
Expected future benefit payments UK Pension Benefits US Pension Benefits UK Pension Benefits US Pension Benefits
 (millions) (millions)
2014 84
 38
2015 88
 42
 83
 41
2016 89
 44
 84
 43
2017 93
 46
 87
 46
2018 94
 49
 89
 49
2019 92
 51
2019-2023 518
 271
 505
 284

105

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

17. PENSION PLANS (Continued)

Willis North America has a 401(k) plan covering all eligible employees of Willis North America and its subsidiaries. The plan allows participants to make pre-tax contributions which the Company, at its discretion may match. During 2009, theThe Company had decideddid not to make any matching contributions in any year presented other than for former HRH employees whose contributions were matched up to 75 percent under the terms of the acquisition. All investment assets of the plan are held in a trust account administered by independent trustees. The Company’s 401(k) matching contributions for 20132014 were $15 million (20122013: $1015 million; 20112012: $10 million), matching contributions were increased 1 percent during 2013.


111

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

19. PENSION PLANS (Continued)

Other defined benefit pension plans
In addition to the Company’s UK and US defined benefit pension plans, the Company has several smaller defined benefit pension plans in certain other countries in which it operates together with a non-qualified defined benefit pension plan in the USUnited States and an unfunded defined benefit pension plan in the UK.United Kingdom.
TheseFor disclosure purposes these smaller additional US and UK plans are incorporatedcombined with the Company's other defined benefit pension plans.plans in the tables below.
In total, a $2739 million net pension benefit liability (20122013: $3027 million) has been recognized in respect of these other schemes.
The following schedules provide information concerning the Company’s international, US non-qualified and UK unfunded defined benefit pension plans:
Other defined benefit plansOther defined benefit plans
2013 20122014 2013
(millions)(millions)
Change in benefit obligation: 
  
 
  
Benefit obligation, beginning of year$180
 $131
$195
 $180
Service cost3
 3
3
 3
Interest cost7
 7
7
 7
Actuarial (gain) loss(5) 30
Actuarial loss (gain)38
 (5)
Benefits paid(6) (6)(9) (6)
Employee contributions
 1
Reclassification from other non-current liabilities (i)
10
 9

 10
Foreign currency changes6
 5
(24) 6
Benefit obligations, end of year195
 180
210
 195
Change in plan assets: 
  
 
  
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year150
 128
168
 150
Actual return on plan assets9
 11
25
 9
Employer contributions10
 11
11
 10
Employee contributions
 1
Benefits paid(6) (6)(9) (6)
Foreign currency changes5
 5
(24) 5
Fair value of plan assets, end of year168
 150
171
 168
Funded status at end of year$(27) $(30)$(39) $(27)
Components on the Consolidated Balance Sheets: 
  
 
  
Pension benefits asset$2
 $2
$
 $2
Liability for pension benefits$(29) $(32)$(39) $(29)

(i)
TransferRepresents the transfer in of the benefit obligation for UK unfunded and US non-qualified plansplan from non-current other liabilities.

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of a net actuarial loss of $2742 million (20122013: $3527 million).

106

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

17. PENSION PLANS (Continued)

The accumulated benefit obligation for the Company’s other defined benefit pension plans was $191203 million (20122013: $177191 million).

112

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

19. PENSION PLANS (Continued)

The components of the net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive loss for the other defined benefit pension plans are as follows:
Other defined benefit plansOther defined benefit plans
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
(millions)(millions)
Components of net periodic benefit cost: 
  
  
 
  
  
Service cost$3
 $3
 $4
$3
 $3
 $3
Interest cost7
 7
 7
7
 7
 7
Expected return on plan assets(6) (6) (6)(6) (6) (6)
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss1
 
 1

 1
 
Curtailment gain
 
 (1)
Net periodic benefit cost$5
 $4
 $5
$4
 $5
 $4
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss): 
  
  
 
  
  
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss$(1) $
 $(1)$
 $(1) $
Net actuarial (gain) loss(8) 25
 2
Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss(9) 25
 1
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive (income) loss$(4) $29
 $6
Net actuarial loss (gain)19
 (8) 25
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss (income)19
 (9) 25
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive loss (income)$23
 $(4) $29

The estimated net loss for the other defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is $nil.$1 million.
The following schedule provides other information concerning the Company’s other defined benefit pension plans:
Other defined benefit plansOther defined benefit plans
2013 20122014 2013
Weighted-average assumptions to determine benefit obligations:      
Discount rate3.30% - 4.40% 2.50% - 3.75%2.00% - 3.60% 3.30% - 4.40%
Rate of compensation increase2.00% - 2.50% 2.00%2.00% - 3.50% 2.00% - 2.50%
Weighted-average assumptions to determine net periodic benefit cost:   
Discount rate2.50% - 4.40% 3.30% - 5.30%3.30% - 4.40% 2.50% - 4.40%
Expected return on plan assets 2.00% - 4.66% 2.00% - 5.73%2.00% - 4.66%  2.00% - 4.66%
Rate of compensation increase2.00% - 2.50% 2.50% - 3.00%2.00% - 2.50% 2.00% - 2.50%

The determination of the expected long-term rate of return on the other defined benefit plan assets is dependent upon the specific circumstances of each individual plan. The assessment may include analyzing historical investment performance, investment community forecasts and current market conditions to develop expected returns for each asset class used by the plans.
The Company’s other defined benefit pension plan asset allocations at December 31, 20132014 based on fair values were as follows:

113107

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

19.17. PENSION PLANS (Continued)

 Other defined benefit plans Other defined benefit plans
Asset Category 2013 2012 2014 2013
Equity securities 35% 35% 24% 35%
Debt securities 39% 39% 40% 39%
Real estate 3% 3% 3% 3%
Derivatives 14% 16% 13% 14%
Other 9% 7% 20% 9%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100%

The investment policies for the international plans vary by jurisdiction but are typically established by the local pension plan trustees, where applicable, and seek to maintain the plans’ ability to meet liabilities of the plans as they fall due and to comply with local minimum funding requirements.
Fair Value Hierarchy
The following tables present, at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, the Company’s other defined benefit pension plan assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
 Other defined benefit plans Other defined benefit plans
December 31, 2013 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
December 31, 2014 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
   (millions)     (millions)  
Equity securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US equities $29
 $
 $
 $29
 $18
 $
 $
 $18
UK equities 5
 
 
 5
 4
 
 
 4
Overseas equities 26
 
 
 26
 18
 
 
 18
Fixed income securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Other Government bonds 61
 
 
 61
 65
 
 
 65
Corporate bonds 4
 
 
 4
 4
 
 
 4
Derivative instruments 
 23
 
 23
 
 23
 
 23
Real estate 
 
 5
 5
 
 
 6
 6
Cash 8
 
 
 8
 11
 
 
 11
Other investments:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Other investments 
 
 7
 7
 14
 
 8
 22
Total $133
 $23
 $12
 $168
 $134
 $23
 $14
 $171




114108

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

19.17. PENSION PLANS (Continued)

 Other defined benefit plans Other defined benefit plans
December 31, 2012 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
December 31, 2013 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
   (millions)     (millions)  
Equity securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US equities $24
 $
 $
 $24
 $29
 $
 $
 $29
UK equities 5
 
 
 5
 5
 
 
 5
Overseas equities 22
 
 1
 23
 26
 
 
 26
Fixed income securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Other Government bonds 49
 
 
 49
 61
 
 
 61
Corporate bonds 
 9
 
 9
 4
 
 
 4
Derivative instruments 
 24
 
 24
 
 23
 
 23
Real estate 
 
 5
 5
 
 
 5
 5
Cash 5
 
 
 5
 8
 
 
 8
Other investments:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Other investments 
 1
 5
 6
 
 
 7
 7
Total $105
 $34
 $11
 $150
 $133
 $23
 $12
 $168


Equity securities comprise:
common stockordinary shares which are valued using quoted market prices; and
unit linked funds which are valued at their net asset values as calculated by the investment manager and typically have daily liquidity.
Fixed income securities compriseinclude overseas Government loan stockbonds which isare typically valued using quoted market prices. prices and derivative instruments which are valued using an income approach typically using swap curves as an input.
Real estate investment comprises overseas property and infrastructure investments which are valued by the fund managermanagers taking into account cost, independent appraisals and market based comparable data. Derivative instruments are valued using an income approach typically using swap curves as an input.
Assets classified as Level 3 investments did not materially change during the year ended December 31, 20132014.
In 20142015, the Company expects to contribute $910 million to the other defined benefit pension plans.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are estimated to be paid by the other defined benefit pension plans:
 Other defined benefit plans Other defined benefit plans
 Pension Pension
Expected future benefit payments Benefits Benefits
 (millions) (millions)
2014 $6
2015 6
 $5
2016 6
 6
2017 6
 6
2018 7
 6
2019 6
2019-2023 35
 32




115109

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


20.18.DEBT
Current portion of the long-term debt consists of the following:
 December 31,
 2013 2012
 (millions)
Current portion of 7-year term loan facility expires 2018$15
 $15
 December 31,
 2014 2013
 (millions)
Current portion of 7-year term loan facility expires 2018$17
 $15
5.625% senior notes due 2015148
 
Fair value adjustment on 5.625% senior notes due 20151
 
3-year term loan facility expires 20151
 
 $167
 $15
Long-term debt consists of the following:
December 31,December 31,
2013 20122014 2013
(millions)(millions)
7-year term loan facility expires 2018$259
 $274
$242
 $259
5.625% senior notes due 2015148
 350

 148
Fair value adjustment on 5.625% senior notes due 20154
 18

 4
4.125% senior notes due 2016299
 299
299
 299
6.200% senior notes due 2017394
 600
394
 394
7.000% senior notes due 2019187
 300
187
 187
5.750% senior notes due 2021496
 496
497
 496
4.625% senior notes due 2023249
 
249
 249
6.125% senior notes due 2043274
 
274
 274
3-year term loan facility expires 20151
 1

 1
$2,311
 $2,338
$2,142
 $2,311
Guarantees
All direct obligations under the 5.625%, 6.200% and 7.000% senior notes are guaranteed by Willis Group Holdings, Willis Netherlands B.V., Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, Trinity Acquisition plcLimited and Willis Group Limited.
All direct obligations under the 4.625% and 6.125% senior notes are guaranteed by Willis Group Holdings, Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, Willis North America Inc. and Willis Group Limited.
All direct obligations under the 4.125% and 5.750% senior notes are guaranteed by Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, Willis North America Inc. and Willis Group Limited.
Debt issuanceTerm loans and revolving credit facilities
On July 23, 2013 wethe Company entered into an amendment to ourits existing credit facilities to extend both the amount of financing and the maturity date of the facilities. As a result of this amendment, ourthe Company's revolving credit facility was increased from $500 million to $800 million. The maturity date on both the revolving credit facility and the $300 million term loan was extended to July 23, 2018, from December 16, 2016.2016, respectively. At the amendment date wethe Company owed $281 million on the term loan and there was no change to this amount as a result of the refinancing.
The 7-year term loan facility expiring 2018 bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.50% and is repayable in quarterly installments and a final repayment of $186 million is due in the third quarter of 2018. In 2013, we2014, the Company made $15 million of mandatory

110

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

18. DEBT (Continued)

repayments against this 7-year term loan. Drawings under the $800 million revolving credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%. These margins apply while the Company’s debt rating remains BBB-/Baa3. As of December 31, 20132014 $nil was outstanding under this revolving credit facility (December 31, 2012:2013: $nil).

The agreements relating to the Company's 7-year term loan facility expiring 2018 and the revolving $800 million credit facility contain requirements to maintain maximum levels of consolidated funded indebtedness in relation to consolidated EBITDA and minimum level of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated cash interest expense, subject to certain adjustments. In addition, the agreements relating to the Company's credit facilities and senior notes include, in the aggregate covenants relating to the delivery of financial statements, reports and notices, limitations on liens, limitations on sales and other disposals of assets, limitations on indebtedness and other liabilities, limitations on sale and leaseback transactions, limitations on mergers and other fundamental changes, maintenance of property, maintenance of insurance, nature of business, compliance with applicable laws, maintenance of corporate existence and rights, payment of taxes and access to information and properties. At December 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.

On March 3, 2014, Willis Securities, Inc., a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings plc, entered into a $300 million revolving note and cash subordination agreement available for drawing from March 3, 2014 through March 3, 2015.
The aggregate unpaid principal amount of all advances is repayable on or before March 3, 2016.

On April 28, 2014, the Company entered into an amendment to the $300 million revolving note and cash subordination
agreement to increase the amount of financing and to extend both the end date of the original credit period and the original
repayment date. As a result of this amendment, the revolving credit facility was increased from $300 million to $400 million.
The end date of the credit period was extended to April 28, 2015 from March 3, 2015 and the repayment date was extended to
April 28, 2016 from March 3, 2016. As of December 31, 2014 $nil was outstanding under this revolving credit facility.

Proceeds under the credit facility will be used for regulatory capital purposes related to securities underwriting only, which will
allow Willis Securities to meet or exceed capital requirements of regulatory agencies, self-regulatory agencies and their clearing
houses, including the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Advances under the credit facility bear interest at a rate
equal to (a) for Eurocurrency Loans, LIBOR plus 1.50% to 2.25%, and (b) for base rates Loans, the highest of (i) the Federal
Funds rates plus 0.5%, (ii) the 'prime rate' as announced by SunTrust Bank, and (iii) LIBOR plus 1.00%, plus 0.5% to 1.25%, in
each case, based upon the Company’s guaranteed senior-unsecured long-term debt rating.
Senior Notes
On August 15, 2013 the Company issued $250 million of 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and $275 million of 6.125% senior notes due 2043. The effective interest rates of these senior notes are 4.696% and 6.154%, respectively, which include the impact of the discount upon issuance.


116

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

20. DEBT (Continued)

On July 25, 2013 the Company commenced an offer to purchase for cash any and all of its 5.625% senior notes due 2015 and a portion of its 6.200% senior notes due 2017 and its 7.000% senior notes due 2019 for an aggregate purchase price of up to $525 million. On August 22, 2013 the proceeds from the issue of the senior notes due 2023 and 2043 were used to fund the purchase of $202 million of 5.625% senior notes due 2015, $206 million of 6.200% senior notes due 2017 and $113 million of 7.000% senior notes due 2019.
The Company incurred total losses on extinguishment of debt of $60 million during the year ended December 31, 2013. This was made up of a tender premium of $65 million, the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of $2 million and a credit for the reduction of the fair value adjustment on 5.625% senior notes due 2015 of $7 million.
The agreements relating to our 7-year term loan facility expiring 2018 and the revolving $800 million credit facility contain requirements to maintain maximum levels of consolidated funded indebtedness in relation to consolidated EBITDA and minimum level of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated cash interest expense, subject to certain adjustments. In addition, the agreements relating to our credit facilities and senior notes include, in the aggregate covenants relating to the delivery of financial statements, reports and notices, limitations on liens, limitations on sales and other disposals of assets, limitations on indebtedness and other liabilities, limitations on sale and leaseback transactions, limitations on mergers and other fundamental changes, maintenance of property, maintenance of insurance, nature of business, compliance with applicable laws, maintenance of corporate existence and rights, payment of taxes and access to information and properties. At December 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company entered into a series of interest rate swaps for a total notional amount of $350 million to receive a fixed rate and pay a variable rate on a semi-annual basis, with a maturity date of July 15, 2015. The Company had previously designated these instruments as fair value hedges against its $350 million5.625% senior notes due 2015 and accounted for them accordingly until the first quarter of 2013 at which point these swaps, although remaining as economic hedges, no longer qualified for hedge accounting.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company closed out the above interest rate swaps and received a cash settlement of $13 million on termination.
Following the partial extinguishment of the 5.625% senior notes due 2015 on August 15, 2013, the Company has recorded a credit of $7 million to remove a corresponding partial amount of the fair value adjustment to the carrying values of the notes originally recognized in connection with the interest rate swaps. The remaining $5 million fair value adjustment as at that date will be amortized through interest expense over the period to maturity.
On November 7, 2012, a further revolving credit facility of $20 million, available solely for the use of our main UK regulated entity and available for use in certain circumstances, was renewed. The facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.55% until 2014 and LIBOR plus 1.700% thereafter. The facility expires on November 6, 2015. As at December 31, 2013 no drawings had been made on the facility. The facility is secured against the freehold of the UK regulated entity’s freehold property in Ipswich.
On July 11, 2013, a revolving credit facility of 15 million Chinese Yuan Renminbi 'RMB' ($2 million) was renewed. This facility bears interest at 110 percent of the applicable short term interest rate an RMB loan having a term equal to the tenor of that drawing as published by the People's Bank of China 'PBOC' prevailing as at the drawdown date of that drawing. The facility expires on July 10, 2014. As at December 31, 2013 ¥nil ($nil) (2012: ¥nil ($nil)) had been drawn down on the facility. This facility was solely for the use of our Chinese subsidiary and is available for general working capital purposes.

Lines of credit
The Company also has available $43 million (20122013: $4 million) in lines of credit, of which $nil$1 million was drawn as of December 31, 2013 (2012: $nil)2014 (2013: $nil).


117111

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc
  
20.18. DEBT (Continued)

Analysis of interest expense
The following table shows an analysis of the interest expense for the years ended December 31:
Year ended December 31,Year ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
(millions)(millions)
5.625% senior notes due 2015$12
 $12
 $12
$8
 $12
 $12
12.875% senior notes due 2016
 
 15
4.125% senior notes due 201613
 13
 10
13
 13
 13
6.200% senior notes due 201733
 38
 38
25
 33
 38
7.000% senior notes due 201918
 21
 21
14
 18
 21
5.750% senior notes due 202129
 29
 23
30
 29
 29
4.625% senior notes due 20234
 
 
11
 4
 
6.125% senior notes due 20436
 
 
16
 6
 
7-year term loan facility expires 20186
 6
 
5
 6
 6
5-year term loan facility repaid 2011
 
 14
Revolving $800 million credit facility2
 1
 
3
 2
 1
Revolving $300 million credit facility
 
 4
Other(i)
3
 8
 19
Revolving $400 million credit facility4
 
 
Other6
 3
 8
Total interest expense$126
 $128
 $156
$135
 $126
 $128

(i)
In 2013, Other includes $nil (2012: $nil; 2011:$10 million ) relating to the write-off of unamortized debt issuance fees.

21.19.PROVISIONS FOR LIABILITIES
An analysis of movements on provisions for liabilities is as follows:
Claims,
lawsuits and
other
proceedings(i)
 
Other
provisions(ii)
 Total
Claims,
lawsuits and
other
proceedings(i)
 
Other
provisions(ii)
 Total
 (millions)  (millions) 
Balance at January 1, 2012$158
 $38
 $196
Net provisions made during the year23
 (2) 21
Utilized in the year(31) (10) (41)
Foreign currency translation adjustment2
 2
 4
Balance at December 31, 2012$152
 $28
 $180
Balance at January 1, 2013$152
 $28
 $180
Net provisions made during the year28
 6
 34
28
 6
 34
Balances transferred in during the year (iii)

 13
 13

 13
 13
Utilized in the year(17) (6) (23)(17) (6) (23)
Foreign currency translation adjustment1
 1
 2
1
 1
 2
Balance at December 31, 2013$164
 $42
 $206
$164
 $42
 $206
Net provisions made during the year19
 5
 24
Balances transferred in during the year (iv)

 5
 5
Utilized in the year(31) (3) (34)
Foreign currency translation adjustment(4) (3) (7)
Balance at December 31, 2014$148
 $46
 $194

(i) 
The claims, lawsuits and other proceedings provision includes E&O cases which represents management’s assessment of liabilities that may arise from asserted and unasserted claims for alleged errors and omissions that arise in the ordinary course of the Group’s business. Where some of the potential liability is recoverable under the Group’s external insurance arrangements, the full assessment of the liability is included in the provision with the associated insurance recovery shown separately as an asset. Insurance recoveries recognized at December 31, 2013 amounted to $nil (2012: $6 million).

(ii) 
The ‘Other’ category includes amounts relating to vacant property provisions of $104 million (20122013: $1310 million).

(iii) 
Provisions held in the UK for ongoing post placement services, long term disability provisions and legal claim provisionsclaims all previously recognized within Deferred Revenue and Accrued Expenses were transferred to Provisions for Liabilities during 2013.

(iv)
Provisions held in the UK for dilapidation on UK properties all previously recognized within Deferred Revenue and Accrued Expenses were transferred to Provisions for Liabilities during 2014.

118112

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statementsWillis Group Holdings plc


22.20.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company’s contractual obligations as at December 31, 20132014 are presented below:
Payments due byPayments due by
Obligations (iii)
Total 2014 2015-2016 2017-2018 After 2018Total 2015 2016-2017 2018-2019 After 2019
(millions)(millions)
7-year term loan facility expires 2018$274
 $15
 $39
 $220
 $
$259
 $17
 $45
 $197
 $
Interest on term loan19
 5
 9
 5
 
14
 4
 8
 2
 
Revolving $800 million credit facility commitment fees9
 2
 4
 3
 
7
 2
 4
 1
 
Revolving $400 million credit facility commitment fees2
 1
 1
 
 
5.625% senior notes due 2015148
 
 148
 
 
148
 148
 
 
 
Fair value adjustments on 5.625% senior notes due 20154
 
 4
 
 
4.125% senior notes due 2016300
 
 300
 
 
300
 
 300
 
 
6.200% senior notes due 2017394
 
 
 394
 
394
 
 394
 
 
7.000% senior notes due 2019187
 
 
 
 187
187
 
 
 187
 
5.750% senior notes due 2021500
 
 
 
 500
500
 
 
 
 500
4.625% senior notes due 2023250
 
 
 
 250
250
 
 
 
 250
6.125% senior notes due 2043275
 
 
 
 275
275
 
 
 
 275
Interest on senior notes1,011
 115
 209
 146
 541
896
 112
 173
 137
 474
Total debt and related interest3,371
 137
 713
 768
 1,753
3,232
 284
 925
 524
 1,499
Operating leases(i)
1,235
 131
 213
 167
 724
1,181
 128
 221
 175
 657
Pensions566
 122
 244
 161
 39
346
 116
 190
 40
 
Other contractual obligations(ii)
91
 24
 16
 12
 39
143
 10
 40
 43
 50
Acquisition liabilities51
 8
 27
 16
 
Total contractual obligations$5,263
 $414
 $1,186
 $1,108
 $2,555
$4,953
 $546
 $1,403
 $798
 $2,206

(i) 
Presented gross of sublease income.
(ii) 
Other contractual obligations include capital lease commitments, put option obligations and investment fund capital call obligations, the timing of which are included at the earliest point they may fall due.
(iii) 
The above excludes $41$19 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits as the Company is unable to reasonably predict the timing of settlement of these liabilities.

Debt obligations and facilities
The Company’s debt and related interest obligations at December 31, 20132014 are shown in the above table.
On July 23, 2013 we entered into an amendment to our existing credit facilities to extend the amount of financing of the facilities. As a result of this amendment, our revolving credit facility was increased from $500 million to $800 million. As at December 31, 2013 $nil was outstanding under the revolving credit facility.
This facility is in addition to the remaining availability of $22 million under the Company’s two other previously existing revolving credit facilities.
The only mandatoryMandatory repayments of debt over the next 12 months areinclude expiration of the 3-year term loan facility expiring 2015, maturity of the 5.625% senior notes due 2015 and the scheduled repayment of $15 millionthe current portion of the Company’s 7-year term loan. WeThe Company also havehas the right, at ourits option, to prepay indebtedness under the credit facility without further penalty and to redeem the senior notes at our option by paying a ‘make-whole’ premium as provided under the applicable debt instrument.

119113

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc
 
22.20. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)


Operating leases
The Company leases certain land, buildings and equipment under various operating lease arrangements. Original non-cancellable lease terms typically are between 10 and 20 years and may contain escalation clauses, along with options that permit early withdrawal. The total amount of the minimum rent is expensed on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
As of December 31, 20132014, the aggregate future minimum rental commitments under all non-cancellable operating lease agreements are as follows:
Gross rental
commitments
 
Rentals from
subleases
 
Net rental
commitments
Gross rental
commitments
 
Rentals from
subleases
 
Net rental
commitments
  (millions)    (millions)  
2014$131
 $(15) $116
2015114
 (14) 100
$128
 $(13) $115
201699
 (13) 86
115
 (13) 102
201788
 (12) 76
106
 (12) 94
201879
 (8) 71
91
 (7) 84
201984
 (5) 79
Thereafter724
 (16) 708
657
 (10) 647
Total$1,235
 $(78) $1,157
$1,181
 $(60) $1,121
The Company leases its main London building under a 25-year operating lease, which expires in 2032. The Company’s contractual obligations in relation to this commitment included in the table above total $719645 million (20122013: $730719 million). Annual rentals are $36 million (20122013: $3236 million) per year and the Company has subleased approximately 29 percent (20122013: 29 percent) of the premises under leases up to 15 years. The amounts receivable from subleases, included in the table above, total $51 million (2013: $66 million (; 2012: $76 million; 2011: $82 million).
Rent expense amounted to $141134 million for the year ended December 31, 20132014 (2013: $141 million; 2012: $135 million; 2011: $127 million). The Company’s rental income from subleases was $1513 million for the year ended December 31, 20132014 (2013: $15 million; 2012: $17 million; 2011: $18 million).
Pensions
Contractual obligations for ourthe Company's pension plans reflect the contributions we expectthe Company expects to make over the next five years into ourthe US, UK and UKOther defined benefit plans. These contributions are based on current funding positions and may increase or decrease dependent on the future performance of the two plans.
In the UK, we areUnited Kingdom, the Company is required to agree a funding strategy for ourthe UK defined benefit plan with the plan's trustees. In March 2012, the Company agreed to a revised schedule of contributions towards on-going accrual of benefits and deficit funding contributions the Company will make to the UK plan over the six years ended December 31, 2017. Contributions in each of the next fourthree years are expected towould total approximately $83$75 million,, of which approximately $23$19 million relates to on-going contributions calculated as 15.9 percent of active plan members' pensionable salary and approximately $60$56 million that relates to contributions towards the funding deficit.
In addition, based on this agreement, further contributions willwould be payable based on a profit share calculation (equal to 20 percent of EBITDA in excess of $900 million per annum as defined by the revised schedule of contributions) and an exceptional return calculation (equal to 10 percent of any exceptional returns made to shareholders, for example, share buybacks, and special dividends). The Company expects to make an exceptional return contribution of $21 million during 2015 as a result of share buyback activity during 2014. Aggregate contributions under the deficit funding contribution and the profit share calculation are capped at £312 million ($517486 million) over the six years ended December 31, 2017.
During 2014 we will be required to negotiateWe are currently negotiating a new funding arrangement which we are required to do every three years, which may further change the contributions we are required to make during 20142015 and beyond.
In addition,An additional amount of approximately $1210 million will be paid annually into the UK defined benefit plan related to employee's salary sacrifice contributions.
The total contracted contributions for all plans in 20142015 are expected to be approximately $122$116 million,, excluding approximately $1210 million in respect of the salary sacrifice scheme.contributions.

120114

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

22.20. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Guarantees
Guarantees issued by certain of Willis Group Holdings’ subsidiaries with respect to the senior notes and revolving credit facilities are discussed in Note 2018 — Debt in these consolidated financial statements.Debt.
Certain of Willis Group Holdings’ subsidiaries have given the landlords of some leasehold properties occupied by the Company in the United Kingdom and the United States guarantees in respect of the performance of the lease obligations of the subsidiary holding the lease. The operating lease obligations subject to such guarantees amounted to $828756 million and $829828 million at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013, respectively. The capital lease obligations subject to such guarantees amounted to $11 million as at December 31, 2014 (2013 (2012: $nil): $11 million).
In addition, the Company has given guarantees to bankers and other third parties relating principally to letters of credit amounting to $1120 million and $1011 million at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013, respectively. Willis Group Holdings also guarantees certain of its UK and Irish subsidiaries’ obligations to fund the UK and Irish defined benefit plans.
Other contractual obligations
For certain subsidiaries and associates, the Company has the right to purchase shares (a call option) from co-shareholders at various dates in the future. In addition, the co-shareholders of certain subsidiaries and associates have the right to sell their shares (a put option) to the Company at various dates in the future. Generally, the exercise price of such put options and call options is formula-based (using revenues and earnings) and is designed to reflect fair value. Based on current projections of profitability and exchange rates and assuming the put options are exercised, the potential amount payable from these options is not expected to exceed $1272 million (20122013: $1912 million).
In July 2010, the Company made a capital commitment of $25 million to Trident V Parallel Fund, LP, an investment fund managed by Stone Point Capital. This replaced a capital commitment of $25 million that had been made to Trident V, LP in December 2009. As at December 31, 20132014 there have been approximately $1522 million of capital contributions.
In May 2011, the Company made a capital commitment of $10 million to Dowling Capital Partners I, LP. As at December 31, 20132014 there had been approximately $47 million of capital contributions.
Other contractual obligations at December 31, 20132014, also include certain capital lease obligations totaling $63$64 million (20122013: $53$63 million), primarily in respect of the Company's Nashville property.
Claims, Lawsuits and Other Proceedings

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to various actual and potential claims, lawsuits, and other
proceedings relating principally to alleged errors and omissions in connection with the placement of insurance and reinsurance.
Similar to other corporations, the Company is also subject to a variety of other claims, including those relating to the
Company’s employment practices. Some of the claims, lawsuits and other proceedings seek damages in amounts which could,
if assessed, be significant.
Errors and omissions claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business are covered in part by professional indemnity or other appropriate insurance. The terms of this insurance vary by policy year and self-insured risks have increased significantly in recent years. Regarding self-insured risks, the Company has established provisions which are believed to be adequate in the light of current information and legal advice, and the Company adjusts such provisions from time to time according to developments.
On the basis of current information, the Company does not expect that the actual claims, lawsuits and other proceedings to which the Company is subject, or potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings relating to matters of which it is aware, will ultimately have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Nonetheless, given the large or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these actions, and the inherent unpredictability of litigation and disputes with insurance companies, it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.
The material actual or potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings, of which the Company is currently aware, are:are as follows:


121

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc
22. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)


Stanford Financial Group Litigation
The Company has been named as a defendant in 13 similar lawsuits relating to the collapse of The Stanford Financial Group (‘Stanford’), for which Willis of Colorado, Inc. acted as broker of record on certain lines of insurance. The complaints in these actions generally allege that the defendants actively and materially aided Stanford’s alleged fraud by providing Stanford with certain letters regarding coverage that they knew would be used to help retain or attract actual or prospective Stanford client investors. The complaints further allege that these letters, which contain statements about Stanford and the insurance policies that the defendants placed for Stanford, contained untruths and omitted material facts and were drafted in this manner to help Stanford promote and sell its allegedly fraudulent certificates of deposit.
The 13 actions are as follows:
Troice, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:9-CV-1274-N, was filed on July 2, 2009Errors and omissions claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings arising in the U.S. District Court forordinary course of business are covered in part by
professional indemnity or other appropriate insurance. The terms of this insurance vary by policy year and self-insured risks
have increased significantly in recent years. Regarding self-insured risks, the Northern District of Texas against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and a Willis associate, among others. On April 1, 2011, plaintiffs filed the operative Third Amended Class Action Complaint individually and on behalf of a putative, worldwide class of Stanford investors, adding Willis Limited as a defendant and alleging claims under Texas statutory and common law and seeking damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages and costs. On May 2, 2011, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the Third Amended Class Action Complaint, arguing, inter alia, that the plaintiffs’ claimsCompany has established provisions which are precluded by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (‘SLUSA’).
On May 10, 2011, the court presiding over the Stanford-related actions in the Northern District of Texas entered an order providing that it would consider the applicability of SLUSA to the Stanford-related actions based on the decision in a separate Stanford action not involving a Willis entity, Roland v. Green, Civil Action No. 3:10-CV-0224-N. On August 31, 2011, the court issued its decision in Roland, dismissing that action with prejudice under SLUSA.
On October 27, 2011, the court in Troice entered an order (i) dismissing with prejudice those claims asserted in the Third Amended Class Action Complaint on a class basis on the grounds set forth in the Roland decision discussed above and (ii) dismissing without prejudice those claims asserted in the Third Amended Class Action Complaint on an individual basis. Also on October 27, 2011, the court entered a final judgment in the action.
On October 28, 2011, the plaintiffs in Troice filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Subsequently, Troice, Roland and a third action captioned Troice, et al. v. Proskauer Rose LLP, Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-01600-N, which also was dismissed on the grounds set forth in the Roland decision discussed above and on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, were consolidated for purposes of briefing and oral argument. Following the completion of briefing and oral argument, on March 19, 2012, the Fifth Circuit reversed and remanded the actions. On April 2, 2012, the defendants-appellees filed petitions for rehearing en banc. On April 19, 2012, the petitions for rehearing en banc were denied. On July 18, 2012, defendants-appellees filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court regarding the Fifth Circuit's reversal in Troice. On January 18, 2013, the Supreme Court granted our petition. Opening briefs were filed on May 3, 2013 and the Supreme Court heard oral argument on October 7, 2013. On February 26, 2014, the Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit’s decision.
Ranni v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 9-22085, was filed on July 17, 2009 against Willis Group Holdings plc and Willis of Colorado, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The complaint was filed on behalf of a putative class of Venezuelan and other South American Stanford investors and alleges claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and Rule 10b-5 thereunder) and Florida statutory and common law and seeks damages in an amount to be determined at trial. On October 6, 2009, Ranni was transferred, for consolidation or coordination with other Stanford-related actions (including Troice), to the Northern District of Texas by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the ‘JPML’). The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Ranni.
Canabal, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:9-CV-1474-D, was filed on August 6, 2009 against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate named as a defendant in Troice, among others, also in the Northern District of Texas. The complaint was filed individually and on behalf of a putative class of Venezuelan Stanford investors, alleged claims under Texas statutory and common law and sought damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. On December 18, 2009, the parties in Troice and Canabal stipulated to the consolidation of those actions (under the Troice civil action number), and, on December 31, 2009, the plaintiffs in Canabal filed a notice of dismissal, dismissing the action without prejudice.

122

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

22. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Rupert, et al. v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2009C115137, was filed on September 14, 2009 on behalf of 97 Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Bexar County). The complaint alleges claims under the Securities Act of 1933, Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks special, consequential and treble damages of more than $300 million, attorneys’ fees and costs. On October 20, 2009, certain defendants, including Willis of Colorado, Inc., (i) removed Rupert to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this related action and (iii) moved to stay the action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On April 1, 2010, the JPML issued a final transfer order for the transfer of Rupert to the Northern District of Texas. On January 24, 2012, the court remanded Rupert to Texas state court (Bexar County), but stayed the action until further order of the court. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Rupert.
Casanova, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:10-CV-1862-O, was filed on September 16, 2010 on behalf of seven Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis Limited, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, also in the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleges claims under Texas statutory and common law and seeks actual damages in excess of $5 million, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Casanova.
Rishmague, et ano. v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2011CI2585, was filed on March 11, 2011 on behalf of two Stanford investors, individually and as representatives of certain trusts, against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc., Willis of Texas, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Bexar County). The complaint alleges claims under Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks special, consequential and treble damages of more than $37 million and attorneys’ fees and costs. On April 11, 2011, certain defendants, including Willis of Colorado, Inc., (i) removed Rishmague to the Western District of Texas, (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this related action and (iii) moved to stay the action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On August 8, 2011, the JPML issued a final transfer order for the transfer of Rishmague to the Northern District of Texas, where it is currently pending. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in Rishmague.
MacArthur v. Winter, et al., Case No. 2013-07840, was filed on February 8, 2013 on behalf of two Stanford investors against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis of Colorado, Inc., Willis of Texas, Inc. and the same Willis associate, among others, in Texas state court (Harris County). The complaint alleges claims under Texas and Colorado statutory law and Texas common law and seeks actual, special, consequential and treble damages of approximately $4 million and attorneys' fees and costs. On March 29, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and Willis of Texas, Inc. (i) removed MacArthur to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas and (ii) notified the JPML of the pendency of this related action. On April 2, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. and Willis of Texas, Inc. filed a motion in the Southern District of Texas to stay the action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. Also on April 2, 2013, the court presiding over MacArthur in the Southern District of Texas transferred the action to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation or coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in MacArthur.
Florida suits: On February 14, 2013, five law suits were filed against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis Limited and Willis of Colorado, Inc. in Florida state court (Miami-Dade County) alleging violations of Florida common law. The five suits are: (1) Barbar, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05666CA27, filed on behalf of 35 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $30 million; (2) deGadala-Maria, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05669CA30, filed on behalf of 64 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $83.5 million; (3) Ranni, et ano. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05673CA06, filed on behalf of two Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $3 million; (4) Tisminesky, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05676CA09, filed on behalf of 11 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $6.5 million; and (5) Zacarias, et al. v. Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, et al., Case No. 13-05678CA11, filed on behalf of 10 Stanford investors seeking compensatory damages in excess of $12.5 million. On June 3, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. removed all five cases to the Southern District of Florida and, on June 4, 2013, notified the JPML of the pendency of these related actions. On June 10, 2013, the court in Tisminesky issued an order sua sponte staying and administratively closing that action pending a determination by the JPML as to whether it should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas for consolidation and coordination with the other Stanford-related actions. On June 11, 2013, Willis of Colorado, Inc. moved to stay the other four actions pending the JPML's transfer decision. On June 20, 2013, the JPML issued a conditional transfer order for the

123115

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc
 
22.20. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)


transferbelieved to be adequate in the light of current information and legal advice, and the five actionsCompany adjusts such provisions from time
to time according to developments. These provisions have been recognized in other operating expenses to the Northern Districtextent that losses are deemed probable and reasonably estimable. Matters that are not probable or reasonably estimable have not been provided for and the Company does not believe a reasonable possible range of Texas,losses, for these matters, can be estimated.

On the transmittalbasis of current information, the Company does not expect that the actual claims, lawsuits and other proceedings to
which the Company is subject, or potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings relating to matters of which was stayed for seven days to allow for any opposition to be filed. On June 28, 2013, with no opposition having been filed,it is aware, will
ultimately have a material adverse effect on the JPML liftedCompany’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Nonetheless,
given the stay, enabling the transfer to go forward. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaintslarge or indeterminate amounts sought in these actions.
Janvey, et al. v. Willis of Colorado, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:13-CV-03980-D, was filed on October 1, 2013 also in the Northern District of Texas against Willis Group Holdings plc, Willis Limited, Willis North America Inc., Willis of Colorado, Inc. and the same Willis associate. The complaint was filed (i) by Ralph S. Janvey, in his capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver for the Stanford Receivership Estate, and the Official Stanford Investors Committee (the ‘OSIC’) against all defendants and (ii) on behalf of a putative, worldwide class of Stanford investors against Willis North America Inc. Plaintiffs Janvey and the OSIC allege claims under Texas common law and the court’s Amended Order Appointing Receiver, and the putative class plaintiffs allege claims under Texas statutory and common law. Plaintiffs seek actual damages in excess of $1 billion, punitive damages and costs. On November 15, 2013, plaintiffs filed the operative First Amended Complaint, which added certain defendants unaffiliated with Willis. On February 28, 2014, the defendants will file motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint.

Additional actions could be brought in the future by other investors in certificates of deposit issued by Stanford and its affiliates. The Company disputes these allegations and intends to defend itself vigorously against these actions. The outcomes of these actions, however, including any lossesand the inherent unpredictability of litigation and
disputes with insurance companies, it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or other payments that may occur as a result, cannot be predicted at this time.cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.


124116

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statementsWillis Group Holdings plc


23.21.ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS, NET OF TAX
The components of other comprehensive (loss) income (loss) are as follows:
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Before tax amount Tax Net of tax amount Before tax amount Tax Net of tax amount Before tax amount Tax Net of tax amountBefore tax amount Tax Net of tax amount Before tax amount Tax Net of tax amount Before tax amount Tax Net of tax amount
(millions)(millions)
Other comprehensive income:                 
Other comprehensive (loss) income:                 
Foreign currency translation adjustments$20
 $
 $20
 $46
 $
 $46
 $(29) $
 $(29)$(183) $
 $(183) $20
 $
 $20
 $46
 $
 $46
Pension funding adjustments:                                  
Foreign currency translation on pension funding adjustments(15) 5
 (10) (31) 9
 (22) 8
 
 8
49
 (12) 37
 (15) 5
 (10) (31) 9
 (22)
Net actuarial gain (loss)83
 2
 85
 (203) 36
 (167) (303) 95
 (208)
Prior service gain
 
 
 
 
 
 10
 (3) 7
Net actuarial (loss) gain(274) 19
 (255) 83
 2
 85
 (203) 36
 (167)
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss55
 (9) 46
 47
 (9) 38
 34
 (9) 25
48
 (8) 40
 55
 (9) 46
 47
 (9) 38
Amortization of unrecognized prior service gain(5) 1
 (4) (6) 1
 (5) (5) 1
 (4)
Amortization of unrecognized prior service gain and curtailment gain(4) 1
 (3) (5) 1
 (4) (6) 1
 (5)
Curtailment gain2
 
 2
 
 
 
 
 
 
118
 (1) 117
 (193) 37
 (156) (256) 84
 (172)(179) 
 (179) 118
 (1) 117
 (193) 37
 (156)
Derivative instruments:                                  
Gain on interest rate swaps (effective element)
 
 
 3
 (1) 2
 13
 (3) 10

 
 
 
 
 
 3
 (1) 2
Interest rate reclassification adjustment(5) 1
 (4) (5) 1
 (4) (14) 4
 (10)(5) 1
 (4) (5) 1
 (4) (5) 1
 (4)
Gain on forward exchange contracts (effective element)10
 (2) 8
 11
 (2) 9
 3
 (1) 2
(Loss) gain on forward exchange contracts (effective element)(31) 6
 (25) 10
 (2) 8
 11
 (2) 9
Forward exchange contract reclassification adjustment1
 
 1
 (4) 1
 (3) (7) 2
 (5)16
 (3) 13
 1
 
 1
 (4) 1
 (3)
Gain on treasury lock (effective element)19
 (4) 15
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 19
 (4) 15
 
 
 
Treasury lock reclassification adjustment(1) 
 (1) 
 
 
 
 
 
25
 (5) 20
 5
 (1) 4
 (5) 2
 (3)(21) 4
 (17) 25
 (5) 20
 5
 (1) 4
Other comprehensive income (loss)163
 (6) 157
 (142) 36
 (106) (290) 86
 (204)
Less: Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 1
 
 1
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings$163
 $(6) $157
 $(142) $36
 $(106) $(289) $86
 $(203)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(383) 4
 (379) 163
 (6) 157
 (142) 36
 (106)
Less: Other comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests6
 
 6
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(377) $4
 $(373) $163
 $(6) $157
 $(142) $36
 $(106)

125117

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc
  
23.21. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS, NET OF TAX (Continued)

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, are as follows:
Net foreign currency translation adjustment Pension funding adjustment Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments TotalNet foreign currency translation adjustment Pension funding adjustment Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments Total
(millions)(millions)
Balance, December 31, 2010$(52) $(503) $14
 $(541)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications(28) (193) 12
 (209)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
 21
 (15) 6
Net current year other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax and noncontrolling interests(28) (172) (3) (203)
Balance, December 31, 2011$(80) $(675) $11
 $(744)$(80) $(675) $11
 $(744)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications46
 (189) 11
 (132)46
 (189) 11
 (132)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
 33
 (7) 26

 33
 (7) 26
Net current year other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax and noncontrolling interests46
 (156) 4
 (106)46
 (156) 4
 (106)
Balance, December 31, 2012$(34) $(831) $15
 $(850)$(34) $(831) $15
 $(850)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications20
 75
 23
 118
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications20
 75
 23
 118
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
 42
 (3) 39

 42
 (3) 39
Net current year other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax and noncontrolling interests20
 117
 20
 157
Net current year other comprehensive income, net of tax and noncontrolling interests20
 117
 20
 157
Balance, December 31, 2013$(14) $(714) $35
 $(693)$(14) $(714) $35
 $(693)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications(177) (216) (25) (418)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
 37
 8
 45
Net current year other comprehensive loss, net of tax and noncontrolling interests(177) (179) (17) (373)
Balance, December 31, 2014$(191) $(893) $18
 $(1,066)




126118

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

23.21. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS, NET OF TAX (Continued)

Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into the statement of operations are as follows:
Details about accumulated other comprehensive income components Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income Affected line item in the statement of operations Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income Affected line item in the statement of operations
 Years ended December 31,  Years ended December 31, 
 2013 2012 2011  2014 2013 2012 
 (millions)    (millions)   
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges (Note 26)       
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges (Note 24)       
Interest rate swaps $(5) $(5) $(14) Investment income $(5) $(5) $(5) Investment income
Foreign exchange contracts 1
 (4) (7) Other operating expenses 16
 1
 (4) Other income (expense), net
Treasury lock (1) 
 
 Interest expense
 (4) (9) (21) Total before tax 10
 (4) (9) Total before tax
Tax 1
 2
 6
  (2) 1
 2
 
 $(3) $(7) $(15) Net of tax $8
 $(3) $(7) Net of tax
Amortization of defined benefit pension items (Note 19)       
Prior service gain $(5) $(6) $(5) Salaries and benefits
Amortization of defined benefit pension items (Note 17)       
Prior service gain and curtailment gain $(4) $(5) $(6) Salaries and benefits
Net actuarial loss 55
 47
 34
 Salaries and benefits 48
 55
 47
 Salaries and benefits
 50
 41
 29
 Total before tax 44
 50
 41
 Total before tax
Tax (8) (8) (8)  (7) (8) (8) 
 $42
 $33
 $21
 Net of tax $37
 $42
 $33
 Net of tax
              
Total reclassifications for the period $39
 $26
 $6
  $45
 $39
 $26
 


22.EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
The effects on equity of changes in Willis Group Holdings, ownership interest in its subsidiaries are as follows:
 Years ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
   (millions)  
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings$362
 $365
 $(446)
Transfers from noncontrolling interest: 
  
  
Decrease in Willis Group Holdings’ paid-in capital for purchase of noncontrolling interest
 (4) (31)
Increase in Willis Group Holdings’ paid-in capital for sale of noncontrolling interest
 
 2
Net transfers from noncontrolling interest
 (4) (29)
Change from net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings and transfers from noncontrolling interests$362
 $361
 $(475)


127119

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


24.EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
The components of equity and noncontrolling interests are as follows:
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011
 
Willis
Group
Holdings’
stockholders
 
Noncontrolling
interests
 
Total
equity
 
Willis
Group
Holdings’
stockholders
 
Noncontrolling
interests
 
Total
equity
 
Willis
Group
Holdings’
stockholders
 
Noncontrolling
interests
 
Total
equity
 (millions)
Balance at January 1,$1,699
 $26
 $1,725
 $2,486
 $31
 $2,517
 $2,577
 $31
 $2,608
Comprehensive income: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Net income (loss)365
 12
 377
 (446) 13
 (433) 204
 16
 220
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax157
 
 157
 (106) 
 (106) (203) (1) (204)
Comprehensive income (loss)522
 12
 534
 (552) 13
 (539) 1
 15
 16
Dividends(197) (10) (207) (187) (11) (198) (180) (15) (195)
Additional paid-in capital195
 
 195
 81
 
 81
 88
 
 88
Repurchase of shares (i)

 
 
 (100) 
 (100) 
 
 
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests(4) 
 (4) (31) (8) (39) 
 
 
Additional noncontrolling interests
 
 
 2
 1
 3
 
 
 
Balance at December 31,$2,215
 $28
 $2,243
 $1,699
 $26
 $1,725
 $2,486
 $31
 $2,517

(i)
Based on settlement date the Company repurchased 2,796,546 shares at an average price of $35.87 in 2012.

The effects on equity of changes in Willis Group Holdings, ownership interest in its subsidiaries are as follows:
 Years ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
   (millions)  
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings$365
 $(446) $204
Transfers from noncontrolling interest: 
  
  
Decrease in Willis Group Holdings’ paid-in capital for purchase of noncontrolling interest(4) (31) 
Increase in Willis Group Holdings’ paid-in capital for sale of noncontrolling interest
 2
 
Net transfers from noncontrolling interest(4) (29) 
Change from net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings and transfers from noncontrolling interests$361
 $(475) $204


128

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

25.23.SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Supplemental disclosures regarding cash flow information and non-cash flow investing and financing activities are as follows:
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
(millions)(millions)
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: 
  
  
 
  
  
Cash payments for income taxes, net$61
 $63
 $15
$88
 $61
 $63
Cash payments for interest117
 118
 128
123
 117
 118
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities: 
  
  
 
  
  
Write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs$(2) $
 $(23)$
 $(2) $
Write-back of fair value adjustment on 5.625% senior notes due 20157
 
 

 7
 
Assets acquired under capital leases7
 2
 
3
 7
 2
Deferred payments on acquisitions of subsidiaries2
 4
 6
10
 2
 4
Acquisitions: 
  
  
 
  
  
Fair value of assets acquired$47
 $23
 $6
$296
 $47
 $23
Less: 
  
  
 
  
  
Liabilities assumed30
 3
 3
107
 30
 3
Cash acquired1
 
 3
57
 1
 
Net assets acquired, net of cash acquired$16
 $20
 $
$132
 $16
 $20

26.24.DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Fair value of derivative financial instruments
In addition to the note below, see Note 2725 - Fair Value Measurements for information about the fair value hierarchy of derivatives.
Primary risks managed by derivative financial instruments
The main risks managed by derivative financial instruments are interest rate risk and foreign currency risk. The Company’s Board of Directors reviews and approves policies for managing each of these risks as summarized below.
The Company enters into derivative transactions (principally interest rate swaps and forward foreign currency contracts) in order to manage interest rate and foreign currency risks arising from the Company’s operations and its sources of finance. The Company does not hold financial or derivative instruments for trading purposes.
Interest Rate Risk — Investment Income
As a result of the Company’s operating activities, the Company receives cash for premiums and claims which it deposits in short-term investments denominated in US dollars and other currencies.holds Fiduciary funds. The Company earns interest on these funds, which is included in the Company’s financial statements as investment income. These funds are regulated in terms of access and the instruments in which they may be invested, most of which are short-term in maturity.
InThrough the fourth quarter of 2011, in order to manage interest rate risk arising from these financial assets,relating to Fiduciary funds, the Company entered into interest rate swaps to receive a fixed rate of interest and pay a variable rate of interest denominated in the various currencies related to the short-term investments. The use of interest rate contracts essentially converted groups of short-term variable rate investments to fixed rate investments. The fair value of these contracts was recorded in other assets and other liabilities. For contracts that qualified as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes,During the effective portions of changes in fair value were recorded as a component of other comprehensive income, to the extent that the hedge relationships were highly effective.

129

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

26. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

From the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company stopped entering into any new hedging transactions relating to interest rate risk from investments, given the flat yield curve environment at that time. Further to this, during second quarter 2012, the Company closed out its legacy position for these interest rate swap contracts.
relating to such instruments. The fair value of these swaps at the close out date was $16 million, representing a cash settlement amount on termination. In connection with the terminated swaps, the Company retained a gain of $15 million in accumulated other comprehensive income as the forecasted short-term investment transactions in relation to which the swaps qualified as cash flow hedges are still considered probable. These amounts areincome. This gain is being reclassified into earnings consistentin line with when the forecasted swap transactions affect earnings. We expecttransactions. The Company expects approximately $5$1 million of the gain to be recognized in the consolidated statement of operations in 2014.2015.

120

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

24. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the Company had no derivative financial instruments that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk in investments.
Interest Rate Risk — Interest Expense
The Company's operations are financed principally by $2,054 million fixed rate senior notes maturing through 2043 and $274$259 million under a 7-year term loan facility. The Company has access to (i) $800 million under its maina revolving credit facility expiring July 23, 2018, (ii) $400 million under a revolving credit facility expiring April 28, 2015, which will be available for regulatory capital purposes related to securities underwriting only, and (iii) $22 million under two further revolving credit facilities.facilities, of which $20 million is also only available for specific regulatory purposes. As of December 31, 20132014 $nil (2013: $nil) was drawn on these facilities.
The 7-year term loan facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.50% and drawings under the revolving credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%. These margins apply while the Company’s debt rating remains BBB-/Baa3. Should the Company’s debt rating change, then the margin will change in accordance with the credit facilities agreements. The fixed rate senior notes bear interest at various rates as detailed in Note 2018 — ‘Debt’.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company entered into a series of interest rate swaps for a total notional amount of $350 million to receive a fixed rate and pay a variable rate on a semi-annual basis, with a maturity date of July 15, 2015. The Company had previously designated these instruments as fair value hedges against its $350 million 5.625% senior notes due 2015 and had accounted for them accordingly until the first quarter of 2013 at which point these swaps, although remaining as economic hedges, no longer qualified for hedge accounting.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company closed out the above interest rate swaps and received a cash settlement of $13 million on termination.
Following the partial extinguishment of the 5.625% senior notes due 2015 on August 15, 2013, we have recorded a credit of $7 million to remove a corresponding partial amount of the fair value adjustment to the carrying values of the notes originally recognized in connection with the interest rate swaps. The remaining $5 million fair value adjustment as at that date will be amortized through interest expense over the period to maturity.
To hedge against the potential variability in benchmark interest rates in advance of the anticipated debt issuance, the Company entered into two short-term treasury locks during the three months ended June 30, 2013. These were closed out during the three months ended September 30, 2013 following the issue of the new senior notes described in Note 2018 - 'Debt'. The fair value of these treasury locks at the close out date was $21 million, received as a cash settlement on termination.
The Company had designated the Treasury locks as effective hedges of the anticipated transaction and had recognized a gain of $19 million in other comprehensive income in relation to the effective element that qualified for hedge accounting.accounting at that date. This amount will be reclassified into earnings consistent with the recognition of interest expense on the 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and the 6.125% senior notes due 2043. In addition, the Company recognized a $2 million gain in interest expense in the year ended December 31, 2013 for the portion of the treasury locks determined as ineffective.

130

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

26. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

Foreign Currency Risk
The Company’s primary foreign exchange risks arise:
from changes in the exchange rate between US dollars and pounds sterling as its London market operations earn the majority of their revenues in US dollars and incur expenses predominantly in Pounds sterling, and may also hold a significant net sterling asset or liability position on the balance sheet. In addition, the London market operations earn significant revenues in Euros and Japanese yen; and
from the translation into US dollars of the net income and net assets of its foreign subsidiaries, excluding the London market operations which are US dollar denominated.

The foreign exchange risks in its London market operations are hedged as follows:
to the extent that forecast Pound sterling expenses exceed Pound sterling revenues, the Company limits its exposure to this exchange rate risk by the use of forward contracts matched to specific, clearly identified cash outflows arising in the ordinary course of business; and
to the extent the UK operations earn significant revenues in Euros and Japanese yen, the Company limits its exposure to changes in the exchange rate between the US dollar and these currencies by the use of forward contracts matched to a

121

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

24. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

percentage of forecast cash inflows in specific currencies and periods. In addition, we are also exposed to foreign exchange risk on any net sterling asset or liability position in our London market operations.
The fair value of foreign currency contracts is recorded in other assets and other liabilities. For contracts that qualify as accounting hedges, changes in fair value resulting from movements in the spot exchange rate are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income whilst changes resulting from a movement in the time value are recorded in interest expense. For contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting, the total change in fair value is recorded in interest expense. Amounts held in comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings when the hedged exposure affects earnings.
At December 31, 20132014 and 20122013, the Company’s foreign currency contracts were all designated as hedging instruments except for those relating to short-term cash flows and hedges of certain intercompany loans.
The table below summarizes by major currency the contractual amounts of the Company’s forward contracts to exchange foreign currencies for Pounds sterling in the case of US dollars and US dollars for euro and Japanese yen. Foreign currency notional amounts are reported in US dollars translated at contracted exchange rates.
December 31,December 31,
Sell
2013(i)
 
Sell
2012
Sell
2014(i)
 
Sell
2013
(millions)(millions)
US dollar$303
 $255
$678
 $303
Euro97
 55
186
 97
Japanese yen35
 32
51
 35

(i) 
Forward exchange contracts range in maturity from 20142015 to 2015.2017.
In addition to forward exchange contracts, we undertake short-term foreign exchange swaps for liquidity purposes. These are not designated as hedges and do not qualify for hedge accounting. The fair values at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 were immaterial.
During the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, the Company entered into a number of foreign currency transactions in order to hedge certain intercompany loans. These derivatives were not designated as hedging instruments and were for a total notional amount of $228$352 million (December 31, 2012: $632013: $228 million). In respect of these transactions, an immaterial amount has been recognized as an asset within other current assets and a nominalan equivalent gain has been recognized in other income within other operating expenses(expense), net, for the period.

In addition during the year ended December 31, 2014, in order to hedge the Company's exposure relating to the purchase price consideration for acquiring a 75.8 percent holding in Max Matthiessen AB, the Company entered into a series of forward exchange contracts. As a result of these transactions the Company recognized a $14 million expense in other income (expense), net, and an equivalent reduction to cash and cash equivalents in the year.


131122

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plcNotes to the financial statements

26.24. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

Derivative financial instruments
The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments and their balance sheet classification at December 31:
  Fair value  Fair value
Balance sheet December 31, December 31,Balance sheet December 31, December 31,
Derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments:classification 2013 2012classification 2014 2013
  (millions)  (millions)
Assets:   
  
   
  
Interest rate swaps (fair value hedges)Other assets 
 22
Forward exchange contractsOther assets 23
 9
Other assets 26
 23
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments  $23
 $31
  $26
 $23
Liabilities:   
  
   
  
Forward exchange contractsOther liabilities 2
 
Other liabilities 21
 2
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments  $2
 $
  $21
 $2
Cash Flow Hedges
The table below presents the effects of derivative financial instruments in cash flow hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of operations and the consolidated statements of equity for years ended December 31, 20132014, 20122013 and 2011:2012:
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
Amount of
gain (loss)
recognized
in OCI
(i)on derivative (effective element)
 
Location of gain (loss)
reclassified from accumulated OCI
(i) into income (effective element)
 
Amount of
gain (loss)
reclassified
from
accumulated
OCI
(i) into
income(effective element)
 Location of gain (loss)
recognized in income
on derivative (ineffective hedges and ineffective element of effective hedges)
 Amount of
gain (loss)
recognized
in income
on derivative
(ineffective
hedges and
ineffective
element of effective hedges)
Amount of
gain (loss)
recognized
in OCI
(i)on derivative (effective element)
 
Location of gain (loss)
reclassified from accumulated OCI
(i) into income (effective element)
 
Amount of
gain (loss)
reclassified
from
accumulated
OCI
(i) into
income(effective element)
 Location of gain (loss)
recognized in income
on derivative (ineffective hedges and ineffective element of effective hedges)
 Amount of
gain (loss)
recognized
in income
on derivative
(ineffective
hedges and
ineffective
element of effective hedges)
(millions)   (millions)   (millions)(millions)   (millions)   (millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2014 
    
    
Interest rate swaps$
 Investment income $(5) Other income (expense), net $
Treasury locks
 Interest expense (1) Interest expense 
Forward exchange contracts(31) Other income (expense), net 16
 Interest expense (1)
Total$(31)   $10
   $(1)
Year Ended December 31, 2013 
    
    
 
    
    
Interest rate swaps$
 Investment income $(5) Other operating expenses $
$
 Investment income $(5) 
Other income (expense), net

 $
Treasury locks19
 Interest expense 
 Interest expense 2
19
 Interest expense 
 Interest expense 2
Forward exchange contracts10
 Other operating expenses 1
 Interest expense 1
10
 
Other income (expense), net

 1
 Interest expense 1
Total$29
   $(4)   $3
$29
   $(4)   $3
Year Ended December 31, 2012 
    
    
 
    
    
Interest rate swaps$3
 Investment income $(5) Other operating expenses $
$3
 Investment income $(5) 
Other income (expense), net

 $
Forward exchange contracts11
 Other operating expenses (4) Interest expense 1
11
 
Other income (expense), net

 (4) Interest expense 1
Total$14
   $(9)   $1
$14
   $(9)   $1
Year Ended December 31, 2011 
    
    
Interest rate swaps$13
 Investment income $(14) Other operating expenses $
Forward exchange contracts3
 Other operating expenses (7) Interest expense (2)
Total$16
   $(21)   $(2)

Amounts above shown gross of tax.

(i) 
OCI means other comprehensive income.
For interest rate swaps all components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. For foreign exchange contracts, only the changes in fair value resulting from movements in the spot exchange rate are included in this assessment. In instances where the timing of expected cash flows can be matched exactly to the maturity of the foreign exchange contract, then changes in fair value attributable to movement in the forward points are also included.

132123

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statementsWillis Group Holdings plc

26.24. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

At December 31, 20132014 the Company estimates there will be $20$7 million of net derivative gains reclassified from accumulated comprehensive income into earnings within the next twelve months as the forecasted transactions affect earnings.
Fair Value Hedges
The Company had previously designated interest rate swaps as fair value hedges against its $350 million 5.625% senior notes due 2015 and accounted for them accordingly until the first quarter of 2013 at which point these swaps, although remaining as economic hedges, no longer qualified for hedge accounting.
The table below presents the effects of derivative financial instruments in fair value hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
Derivatives in fair value hedging relationshipsHedged item in fair value hedging relationship 
(Loss) gain
recognized for derivative
 
Gain (loss)
recognized
for hedged item
 
Ineffectiveness
recognized in
interest expense
   (millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013   
  
  
Interest rate swaps5.625% senior notes due 2015 $
 $
 $
Year Ended December 31, 2012   
  
  
Interest rate swaps5.625% senior notes due 2015 $(3) $2
 $1
Year Ended December 31, 2011   
  
  
Interest rate swaps5.625% senior notes due 2015 $7
 $(8) $1
All components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
The table below presents the effects of derivative financial instruments no longer in fair value hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
Derivatives no longer in fair value hedging relationshipsHedged item in fair value hedging relationship 
Loss
recognized for derivative
 Amortization or prior loss recognized on hedged item 
Net gain recognized (i)
   (millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2013   
  
  
Interest rate swaps5.625% senior notes due 2015 $(5) $14
 $9
Year Ended December 31, 2012   
  
  
Interest rate swaps5.625% senior notes due 2015 $
 $
 $
Year Ended December 31, 2011   
  
  
Interest rate swaps5.625% senior notes due 2015 $
 $
 $
 ____________________
(i) The net gain was included entirely in interest expense, except for $7 million in the year ended December 31, 2013 which formed part of the loss on extinguishment of debt.

Credit Risk and Concentrations of Credit Risk
Credit risk represents the loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed to perform as contracted and from movements in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. The Company currently does not anticipate non-performance by its counterparties. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk.
Concentrations of credit risk that arise from financial instruments exist for groups of customers or counterparties when they have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. Financial instruments on the balance sheet that potentially subject the Company to

133

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

26. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (Continued)

concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, fiduciary funds, accounts receivable and derivatives which are recorded at fair value.
The Company maintains a policy providing for the diversification of cash and cash equivalent investments and places such investments in an extensive number of financial institutions to limit the amount of credit risk exposure. These financial institutions are monitored on an ongoing basis for credit quality predominantly using information provided by credit agencies.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to receivables are limited due to the large number of clients and markets in which the Company does business, as well as the dispersion across many geographic areas. Management does not believe significant risk exists in connection with the Company's concentrations of credit as of December 31, 2013.2014.


134

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

27.25.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company has categorized its assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis into a three-level fair value hierarchy, based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value as follows:

    Level 1: refers to fair values determined based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets;
    Level 2: refers to fair values estimated using observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data; and
    Level 3: includes fair values estimated using unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosure for financial instruments:

Long-term debt excluding the(excluding related fair value hedge-Fairhedges)-Fair values are based on quoted market values and so classified as Level 1 measurements.

Derivative financial instruments-Market values have been used to determine the fair value of interest rate swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts based on estimated amounts the Company would receive or have to pay to terminate the agreements, taking into account the current interest rate environment or current foreign currency forward rates. Such financial instruments are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.


124

Table of Contents

RecurringNotes to the financial statements
25. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

Financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis

The following table presents, for each of the fair-value hierarchy levels, the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
 December 31, 2013
 
Quoted
prices in
active
markets
for
identical
assets
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
 
Significant
other
unobservable
inputs
  
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
   (millions)  
Assets at fair value: 
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$796
 $
 $
 $796
Fiduciary funds (included within Fiduciary assets)1,662
 
 
 1,662
Derivative financial instruments
 23
 
 23
Total assets$2,458
 $23
 $
 $2,481
Liabilities at fair value: 
  
  
  
Derivative financial instruments$
 $2
 $
 $2
Total liabilities$
 $2
 $
 $2


135

Table of Contents
 December 31, 2014
 
Quoted
prices in
active
markets
for
identical
assets
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
 
Significant
other
unobservable
inputs
  
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
   (millions)  
Assets at fair value: 
  
  
  
Derivative financial instruments
 26
 
 26
Total assets$
 $26
 $
 $26
Liabilities at fair value: 
  
  
  
Derivative financial instruments$
 $21
 $
 $21
Total liabilities$
 $21
 $
 $21

Willis Group Holdings plc
27. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 2012December 31, 2013
Quoted
prices in
active
markets
for
identical
assets
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
 
Significant
other
unobservable
inputs
  
Quoted
prices in
active
markets
for
identical
assets
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
 
Significant
other
unobservable
inputs
  
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 TotalLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
  (millions)    (millions)  
Assets at fair value: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$500
 $
 $
 $500
Fiduciary funds (included within Fiduciary assets)1,796
 
 
 1,796
Derivative financial instruments
 31
 
 31

 23
 
 23
Total assets$2,296
 $31
 $
 $2,327
$
 $23
 $
 $23
Liabilities at fair value: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Changes in fair value of hedged debt(i)

 18
 
 18
Derivative financial instruments$
 $2
 $
 $2
Total liabilities$
 $18
 $
 $18
$
 $2
 $
 $2

(i)

Fair value information about financial instruments not measured at fair value
Changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged debt instrument since inception of the hedging relationship are included in long-term debt.
The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair valuevalues of the Company’sCompany's financial instruments held or issued to finance the Company’s operations is summarized below. Certain estimates and judgments were required to develop thenot measured at fair value amounts.value. The fair value amounts shown below are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company would realize upon disposition nor do they indicate the Company’s intent or ability to dispose of the financial instrument.

125

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc
25. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

December 31,December 31,
2013 20122014 2013
Carrying
amount
 
Fair
value
 
Carrying
amount
 
Fair
value
Carrying
amount
 
Fair
value
 
Carrying
amount
 
Fair
value
  (millions)    (millions)  
Assets: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Derivative financial instruments$23
 $23
 $31
 $31
Cash and cash equivalents$635
 $635
 $796
 $796
Fiduciary funds (included within Fiduciary assets)$1,888
 $1,888
 $1,662
 $1,662
Liabilities: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Short-term debt$15
 $15
 $15
 $15
Current portion of long-term debt$167
 $169
 $15
 $15
Long-term debt2,311
 2,444
 2,338
 2,576
2,142
 2,327
 2,311
 2,444
Derivative financial instruments2
 2
 
 

Non-recurringFinancial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis

The remeasurement of goodwill is classified as non-recurring level 3 fair value assessment due to the significance of unobservable inputs developed using company-specific information. The Company recognized an impairment charge in its North America reporting unit during 2012. The pre-tax impairment charge of $492 million was recognized as a result of the Company's annual goodwill impairment testing performed as of October 1, 2012, which reduced the carrying value of the North America reporting unit goodwill as of that date of $1,782 million to its implied fair value of $1,290 million.

The Company used the income approach to measure the fair value of the North America reporting unit which involves calculating the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of the estimated future cash flows. Cash flow projections were based on management's estimates of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions and the uncertainty related to the business's ability to execute on the projected cash flows. The discount rate used was based on the weighted-average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with the market participant

136

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements
27. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

expectations of characteristics of the individual reporting units. The unobservable inputs used to fair value this reporting unit include projected revenue growth rates, profitability and the market participant assumptions within the discount rate.

The inputs used to measure the fair value of the intangibles assets of the North America reporting unit in step two of the impairment test were largely unobservable, and accordingly, are also classified as Level 3. The fair value was estimated using a multiple period excess earnings method, which is based on management's cash flow projections of revenue growth rates, operating margins and expected customer attrition, taking into consideration industry and market conditions. The discount rate used in the fair value calculations for the intangibles was based on a weighted average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with those assets. The unobservable inputs used in these valuations include projected revenue growth rates, and the market participant assumptions within the discount rate. For more information, on this impairment measured as a nonrecurring fair value adjustment, see Note 1312 - Goodwill.


137126

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


28.26.SEGMENT INFORMATION
During the periods presented, the Company operated through three reporting segments: Global, North America and International. Global provides specialist brokerage and consulting services to clients worldwide for specific industrial and commercial activities and is organized by specialism. North America and International predominantly comprise our retail operations which provide services to small, medium and large corporations, accessing Global’s specialist expertise when required.
The Company evaluatesuses segment operating income (loss) to measure segment performance. The Company does not allocate all expenses that form part of total expenses in the consolidated statements of operations to its operating segments because management does not include this information in its measurement of the performance of its segments based on organic commissions and fees growth andthose segments. Because of this unallocated expense, the operating income. For internalincome (loss) of each reporting and segmentalsegment does not reflect the operating income (loss) reporting the following items for which segmental management are not held accountable are excluded from segmental expenses:
(i)foreign exchange hedging activities, foreign exchange movements on the UK pension plan asset, foreign exchange gains and losses from currency purchases and sales, and foreign exchange movements on internal exposures;
(ii)amortization of intangible assets;
(iii)gains and losses on the disposal of operations;
(iv)significant legal and regulatory settlements which are managed centrally; 
(v)costs associated with the 2011 Operational Review;
(vi)write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance and associated legal fees and insurance recoveries arising in Chicago due to fraudulent overstatement of commissions and fees;
(vii)the additional incentive accrual recognized following the replacement of annual cash retention awards with annual cash bonuses which will not feature a repayment requirement;
(viii)write-off of unamortized cash retention awards following the decision to eliminate repayment requirement on past awards;
(ix)goodwill impairment charge;
(x)fees related to the extinguishment of debt; and
(xi)costs associated with the Expense Reduction Initiative.

segment would report as a stand-alone business.
The accounting policies of the segments are consistent with those described in Note 2 — 'Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies'.
There are no inter-segment revenues, with segments operating on a revenue-sharing basis equivalent to that used when sharing business with other third-party brokers.

138

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements
28. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

Selected information regarding the Company’s segments is as follows:
 
Commissions
and fees
 
Investment
income
 
Other
income
 
Total
revenues
 
Depreciation
and
amortization
 
Operating
income (loss)
 
Interest in
earnings of
associates,
net of tax
       (millions)      
Year Ended December 31, 2013 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Global$1,188
 $3
 $
 $1,191
 $31
 $334
 $
North America1,377
 2
 7
 1,386
 37
 269
 
International1,068
 10
 
 1,078
 21
 181
 
Total Retail2,445
 12
 7
 2,464
 58
 450
 
Total Operating Segments3,633
 15
 7
 3,655
 89
 784
 
Corporate and Other(i)

 
 
 
 60
 (99) 
Total Consolidated$3,633
 $15
 $7
 $3,655
 $149
 $685
 $
              
Year Ended December 31, 2012 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Global$1,124
 $5
 $
 $1,129
 $27
 $372
 $
North America1,306
 3
 4
 1,313
 31
 240
 
International1,028
 10
 
 1,038
 21
 183
 5
Total Retail2,334
 13
 4
 2,351
 52
 423
 5
Total Operating Segments3,458
 18
 4
 3,480
 79
 795
 5
Corporate and Other(i)

 
 
 
 59
 (1,004) 
Total Consolidated$3,458
 $18
 $4
 $3,480
 $138
 $(209) $5
              
Year Ended December 31, 2011 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Global$1,073
 $9
 $
 $1,082
 $23
 $352
 $
North America1,314
 7
 2
 1,323
 28
 271
 
International1,027
 15
 
 1,042
 18
 221
 12
Total Retail2,341
 22
 2
 2,365
 46
 492
 12
Total Operating Segments3,414
 31
 2
 3,447
 69
 844
 12
Corporate and Other(i)

 
 
 
 73
 (278) 
Total Consolidated$3,414
 $31
 $2
 $3,447
 $142
 $566
 $12
 
Commissions
and fees
 
Investment
income
 
Other
income
 
Total
revenues
 
Depreciation
and
amortization
 
Operating
income (loss)
       (millions)    
Year Ended December 31, 2014 
  
  
  
  
  
Global$1,386
 $9
 $15
 $1,410
 $36
 $352
North America1,365
 1
 4
 1,370
 71
 273
International1,016
 6
 
 1,022
 27
 197
Total segments3,767
 16
 19
 3,802
 134
 822
Corporate and other(i)

 
 
 
 12
 (175)
Total consolidated$3,767
 $16
 $19
 $3,802
 $146
 $647
            
Year Ended December 31, 2013 
  
  
  
  
  
Global$1,358
 $6
 $
 $1,364
 $36
 $376
North America1,349
 2
 7
 1,358
 77
 249
International926
 7
 
 933
 22
 178
Total segments3,633
 15
 7
 3,655
 135
 803
Corporate and other(i)

 
 
 
 14
 (140)
Total consolidated$3,633
 $15
 $7
 $3,655
 $149
 $663
            
Year Ended December 31, 2012 
  
  
  
  
  
Global$1,303
 $7
 $
 $1,310
 $33
 $400
North America1,281
 3
 4
 1,288
 76
 252
International874
 8
 
 882
 23
 167
Total segments3,458
 18
 4
 3,480
 132
 819
Corporate and other(i)

 
 
 
 6
 (1,044)
Total consolidated$3,458
 $18
 $4
 $3,480
 $138
 $(225)

(i) 
See the following table for an analysis of the ‘Corporate and other’ line.


139127

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc
  
28.26. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

 Years ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
 (millions)
Amortization of intangible assets$(55) $(59) $(68)
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy (a)

 (252) 
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor (b)

 (200) 
Goodwill impairment charge (c)

 (492) 
India joint venture settlement (d)

 (11) 
Insurance recovery (e)

 10
 
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance in Chicago (f)

 (13) (22)
Net gain (loss) on disposal of operations (d)
2
 (3) 4
Foreign exchange hedging3
 8
 5
Foreign exchange gain (loss) on the UK pension plan asset8
 (1) 
2011 Operational Review
 
 (180)
FSA regulatory settlement
 
 (11)
Expense Reduction Initiative(46) 
 
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt (h)
(1) 
 
Other(g)
(10) 9
 (6)
Total Corporate and Other$(99) $(1,004) $(278)

(a)
Additional incentive accrual recognized following the replacement of annual incentive awards with annual cash bonuses which will not feature a repayment requirement.

(b)
Write-off of unamortized cash retention award debtor following the decision to eliminate the repayment requirement on past awards.

(c)
Non-cash charge recognized related to the impairment of the carrying value of the North America reporting unit's goodwill.
(d)
$11 million settlement with former partners related to the termination of a joint venture arrangement in India. In addition, a $1 million loss on disposal of operations was recorded related to the termination.

(e)
Insurance recovery, recorded in Other operating expenses, related to a previously disclosed fraudulent activity in Chicago, discussed above.

(f)
In early 2012 the Company identified an uncollectible accounts receivable balance of approximately $28 million in Chicago due to fraudulent overstatements of Commissions and fees. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recorded an estimate of the misstatement of Commissions and fees from prior periods by recognizing in the fourth quarter of 2011 a $22 million charge to Other operating expenses to write off the uncollectible receivable at January 1, 2011.

The Company concluded its internal investigation into these matters in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and identified an additional $12 million in fraudulent overstatement of Commissions and fees, and has corrected the additional misstatement by recognizing a $13 million charge (including legal expenses) to Other operating expenses in the first quarter of 2012. The above amount represents the additional charge taken.
 Years ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (millions)
Costs of the holding company$(13) $(10) $(4)
Costs related to Group functions, leadership and projects(194) (118) (114)
Non-servicing elements of defined benefit pension53
 42
 38
Significant legal and regulatory settlements managed centrally(2) (6) (6)
Restructuring costs relating to the Operational Improvement Program(17) 
 
Additional incentive accrual for change in remuneration policy
 
 (252)
Write-off of unamortized cash retention awards debtor
 
 (200)
Goodwill impairment charge
 
 (492)
India joint venture settlement
 
 (11)
Insurance recovery
 
 10
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable balance in Chicago
 
 (13)
Expense Reduction Initiative
 (46) 
Fees related to the extinguishment of debt
 (1) 
Other(2) (1) 
Total Corporate and Other$(175) $(140) $(1,044)

(g)
Other includes $7 million (2012: $7 million, 2011: $12 million) from the release of funds and reserves related to potential legal liabilities.
(h)
$1 million of fees associated with the extinguishment of debt completed on August 15, 2013.
The following table reconciles total consolidated operating income (loss), as disclosed in the operating segment tables above, to consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes and interest in earnings of associates.

140

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements
28. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

 Years ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
 (millions)
Total consolidated operating income$685
 $(209) $566
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs
 
 (171)
Loss on extinguishment of debt(60) 
 
Interest expense(126) (128) (156)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and interest in earnings of associates$499
 $(337) $239
 Years ended December 31,
 2014 2013 2012
 (millions)
Total consolidated operating income (loss)$647
 $663
 $(225)
Other (expense) income, net6
 22
 16
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 (60) 
Interest expense(135) (126) (128)
Income (loss) before income taxes and interest in earnings of associates$518
 $499
 $(337)
The Company does not currently provide asset information by reportable segment as it does not routinely evaluate the total asset position by segment, and as such, no segmental analysissegment.

128

Table of assets has been disclosed. Segments are evaluated on organic commissions and fees growth and operating margin.Contents

Notes to the financial statements
26. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

Segment revenue by product is as follows:
Years ended December 31,Years ended December 31,
2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012
Global North America International TotalGlobal North America International Total
(millions)(millions)
Commissions and fees: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Retail insurance services$
 $
 $
 $1,377
 $1,306
 $1,314
 $1,068
 $1,028
 $1,027
 $2,445
 $2,334
 $2,341
$153
 $158
 $165
 $1,365
 $1,349
 $1,281
 $1,016
 $926
 $874
 $2,534
 $2,433
 $2,320
Specialty insurance services1,188
 1,124
 1,073
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,188
 1,124
 1,073
1,233
 1,200
 1,138
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,233
 1,200
 1,138
Total commissions and fees1,188
 1,124
 1,073
 1,377
 1,306
 1,314
 1,068
 1,028
 1,027
 3,633
 3,458
 3,414
1,386
 1,358
 1,303
 1,365
 1,349
 1,281
 1,016
 926
 874
 3,767
 3,633
 3,458
Investment income3
 5
 9
 2
 3
 7
 10
 10
 15
 15
 18
 31
9
 6
 7
 1
 2
 3
 6
 7
 8
 16
 15
 18
Other income
 
 
 7
 4
 2
 
 
 
 7
 4
 2
15
 
 
 4
 7
 4
 
 
 
 19
 7
 4
Total Revenues$1,191
 $1,129
 $1,082
 $1,386
 $1,313
 $1,323
 $1,078
 $1,038
 $1,042
 $3,655
 $3,480
 $3,447
$1,410
 $1,364
 $1,310
 $1,370
 $1,358
 $1,288
 $1,022
 $933
 $882
 $3,802
 $3,655
 $3,480

None of the Company’s customers represented more than 10 percent of the Company’s consolidated commissions and fees for the years ended December 31, 20132014, 20122013 and 20112012.
Information regarding the Company’s geographic locations is as follows:
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112014 2013 2012
(millions)(millions)
Commissions and fees(i)
 
  
  
 
  
  
UK$1,026
 $980
 $963
$1,027
 $1,026
 $980
US1,549
 1,484
 1,461
1,592
 1,549
 1,484
Other(ii)
1,058
 994
 990
1,148
 1,058
 994
Total$3,633
 $3,458
 $3,414
$3,767
 $3,633
 $3,458
December 31,December 31,
2013 20122014 2013
(millions)(millions)
Fixed assets 
  
 
  
UK$233
 $218
$232
 $233
US203
 207
193
 203
Other(ii)
45
 43
58
 45
Total$481
 $468
$483
 $481

(i) 
Commissions and fees are attributed to countries based upon the location of the subsidiary generating the revenue.
(ii) 
Other than in the United Kingdom and the United States, the Company does not conduct business in any country in which its commissions and fees and or fixed assets exceed 10 percent of consolidated commissions and fees and or fixed assets, respectively.

141129

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


29.27.SUBSIDIARY UNDERTAKINGS
The Company has investments in the following subsidiary undertakings which principally affect the net income or net assets of the Group.
A full list of the Group’s subsidiary undertakings is included within the Company’s annual return.
Subsidiary nameCountry of registrationClass of sharePercentage ownership
Holding companies   
TAI LimitedEngland and WalesOrdinary shares100%
Trinity Acquisition plcLimitedEngland and WalesOrdinary shares100%
Willis Faber LimitedEngland and WalesOrdinary shares100%
Willis Group LimitedEngland and WalesOrdinary shares100%
Willis Investment UK Holdings LimitedEngland and WalesOrdinary shares100%
Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V.NetherlandsOrdinary shares100%
Willis Europe B.V.England and WalesOrdinary shares100%
Insurance broking companies   
Willis HRH, Inc. USACommon shares100%
Willis LimitedEngland and WalesOrdinary shares100%
Willis North America, Inc. USACommon shares100%
Willis Re, Inc. USACommon shares100%


142130

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statementsWillis Group Holdings plc


30.28.FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES
Willis North America Inc. (‘Willis North America’) has $148 million senior notes outstanding that were issued on July 1, 2005, $394 million of senior notes issued on March 28, 2007 and $187 million of senior notes issued on September 29, 2009.
All direct obligations under the senior notes are jointly and severally, irrevocably and fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, Trinity Acquisition plcLimited (previously registered as Trinity Acquisition plc) and Willis Group Limited, collectively the 'Other Guarantors', and with Willis Group Holdings, the 'Guarantor Companies'.
The debt securities that were issued by Willis North America and guaranteed by the entities described above, and for which the disclosures set forth below relate and are required under applicable SEC rules, were issued under an effective registration statement.
Presented below is condensed consolidating financial information for:

(i)Willis Group Holdings, which is a guarantor, on a parent company only basis;

(ii)
the Other Guarantors, which are all 100 percent directly or indirectly owned subsidiaries of the parent and are all direct or indirect parents of the issuer;

(iii)the Issuer, Willis North America;

(iv)Other, which are the non-guarantor subsidiaries, on a combined basis;

(v)Consolidating adjustments; and

(vi)the Consolidated Company.
The equity method has been used for investments in subsidiaries in the condensed consolidating balance sheets for the year ended December 31, 20132014 of Willis Group Holdings, the Other Guarantors and the Issuer.


Restatement to 2011 and 2012 financial information

Regulation S-X, Article 3, Rule 3-10, allows for the presentation of condensed consolidating financial information. In accordance with these rules, the condensed consolidating financial information should be presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, except that (i) the guarantor and non-guarantor information is presented on a combined rather than consolidated basis, which requires the elimination of intra-entity activity and (ii) investments in subsidiaries are required to be presented under the equity method of accounting. Subsequent to the issuance of our 2012 financial statements, management determined that certain balances were not presented in accordance with the above principles and have therefore restated our condensed consolidating financial information to reflect (i) gross, rather than net, presentation of intercompany balance sheet positions, (ii) dividends received from subsidiaries as reductions to the equity method investment balances opposed to as component of investment income from group undertakings, and (iii) appropriate push down accounting for goodwill.

The impacts of these changes on the previously reported 2012 and 2011 financial statements are shown in the tables below.





143131

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of operations for the year ended 31 December 2012     
Willis Group Holdings     
Operating loss$(6) $
 $(6)
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(446) 
 (446)
The Other Guarantors     
Operating loss$(72) $(11) $(83)
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(389) (8) (397)
The Issuer     
Operating loss$(189) $
 $(189)
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(228) 
 (228)
Other     
Operating income (loss)$122
 $(53) $69
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(118) (306) (424)
Consolidating adjustments     
Operating (loss) income$(64) $64
 $
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings735
 314
 1,049
      
 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of operations for the year ended 31 December 2011     
Willis Group Holdings     
Operating loss$(20) $
 $(20)
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings204
 
 204
The Other Guarantors     
Operating income (loss)$43
 $(11) $32
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings174
 72
 246
The Issuer     
Operating loss$(179) $
 $(179)
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(36) (31) (67)
Other     
Operating income (loss)$754
 $(21) $733
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings137
 164
 301
Consolidating adjustments     
Operating (loss) income$(32) $32
 $
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(275) (205) (480)


144

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2012     
Willis Group Holdings     
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(552) $
 $(552)
The Other Guarantors     
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(486) $(8) $(494)
The Issuer     
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(263) $
 $(263)
Other     
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(226) $(306) $(532)
Consolidating adjustments     
Comprehensive income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$975
 $314
 $1,289
      
 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2011     
Willis Group Holdings     
Comprehensive income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$1
 $
 $1
The Other Guarantors     
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(24) $72
 $48
The Issuer     
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(117) $(31) $(148)
Other     
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(65) $164
 $99
Consolidating adjustments     
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings$206
 $(205) $1


145

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating balance sheet at 31 December 2012     
Willis Group Holdings     
Total assets$2,557
 $1,541
 $4,098
Total liabilities858
 1,541
 2,399
Total equity1,699
 
 1,699
The Other Guarantors     
Total assets$(1,256) $4,844
 $3,588
Total liabilities319
 4,930
 5,249
Total equity(1,575) (86) (1,661)
The Issuer     
Total assets$1,382
 $1,246
 $2,628
Total liabilities1,348
 1,246
 2,594
Total equity34
 
 34
Other     
Total assets$17,125
 $(1,483) $15,642
Total liabilities11,851
 720
 12,571
Total equity5,274
 (2,203) 3,071
Consolidating adjustments     
Total assets$(4,696) $(6,148) $(10,844)
Total liabilities(989) (8,437) (9,426)
Total equity(3,707) 2,289
 (1,418)

146

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 December 2012     
Willis Group Holdings     
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(42) $19
 $(23)
Net cash provided by investing activities
 256
 256
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities43
 (275) (232)
The Other Guarantors     
Net cash provided by operating activities$780
 $724
 $1,504
Net cash used in investing activities(7) (102) (109)
Net cash used in financing activities(773) (622) (1,395)
The Issuer     
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$69
 $(113) $(44)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(19) 34
 15
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(213) 79
 (134)
Other     
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$431
 $(528) $(97)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(146) 1,149
 1,003
Net cash used in financing activities(61) (621) (682)
Consolidating adjustments     
Net cash used in operating activities$(713) $(102) $(815)
Net cash used in investing activities
 (1,337) (1,337)
Net cash provided by financing activities713
 1,439
 2,152
      
 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 December 2011     
Willis Group Holdings     
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(41) $85
 $44
Net cash used in investing activities
 (711) (711)
Net cash provided by financing activities41
 626
 667
The Other Guarantors     
Net cash provided by operating activities$184
 $132
 $316
Net cash used in investing activities(4) (430) (434)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(180) 298
 118
The Issuer     
Net cash provided by operating activities$88
 $46
 $134
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(21) 128
 107
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities20
 (174) (154)
Other     
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$1,269
 $(1,138) $131
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(76) 123
 47
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,156) 1,015
 (141)
Consolidating adjustments     
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(1,061) $875
 $(186)
Net cash provided by investing activities
 890
 890
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities1,061
 (1,765) (704)


147

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

30.28. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2013Year Ended December 31, 2014
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
    (millions)        (millions)    
REVENUES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Commissions and fees$
 $
 $8
 $3,625
 $
 $3,633
$
 $
 $8
 $3,759
 $
 $3,767
Investment income
 
 
 15
 
 15

 
 
 16
 
 16
Other income
 
 
 7
 
 7

 
 
 19
 
 19
Total revenues
 
 8
 3,647
 
 3,655

 
 8
 3,794
 
 3,802
EXPENSES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Salaries and benefits(1) 
 (103) (2,103) 
 (2,207)(1) 
 (81) (2,232) 
 (2,314)
Other operating expenses
 (73) (163) (380) 
 (616)(16) (95) (38) (510) 
 (659)
Depreciation expense
 (3) (20) (71) 
 (94)
 (4) (17) (71) 
 (92)
Amortization of intangible assets
 
 
 (55) 
 (55)
 
 
 (54) 
 (54)
Net gain on disposal of operations
 
 
 12
 (10) 2
Restructuring costs
 (11) (3) (22) 
 (36)
Total expenses(1) (76) (286) (2,597) (10) (2,970)(17) (110) (139) (2,889) 
 (3,155)
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME(1) (76) (278) 1,050
 (10) 685
(17) (110) (131) 905
 
 647
Other (expense) income, net(15) (220) 
 11
 230
 6
Income from Group undertakings
 191
 364
 86
 (641) 

 221
 313
 102
 (636) 
Expenses due to Group undertakings(10) (34) (141) (456) 641
 

 (33) (179) (424) 636
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 (60) 
 
 (60)
Interest expense(42) (16) (63) (5) 
 (126)(43) (35) (45) (12) 
 (135)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(53) 65
 (178) 675
 (10) 499
(75) (177) (42) 582
 230
 518
Income taxes
 23
 
 (145) 
 (122)
 25
 24
 (208) 
 (159)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(53) 88
 (178) 530
 (10) 377
(75) (152) (18) 374
 230
 359
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 9
 
 (9) 
 

 10
 
 4
 
 14
Equity account for subsidiaries418
 320
 150
 
 (888) 
437
 570
 76
 
 (1,083) 
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS365
 417
 (28) 521
 (898) 377
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 
NET INCOME (LOSS)365
 417
 (28) 521
 (898) 377
NET INCOME362
 428
 58
 378
 (853) 373
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (12) 
 (12)
 
 
 (11) 
 (11)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$365
 $417
 $(28) $509
 $(898) $365
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$362
 $428
 $58
 $367
 $(853) $362



148132

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

30.28. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
Comprehensive (loss) income$(11) $69
 $(110) $49
 $(3) $(6)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (5) 
 (5)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(11) $69
 $(110) $44
 $(3) $(11)


133

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

28. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
 Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
REVENUES 
  
  
  
  
  
Commissions and fees$
 $
 $8
 $3,625
 $
 $3,633
Investment income
 
 
 15
 
 15
Other income
 
 
 7
 
 7
Total revenues
 
 8
 3,647
 
 3,655
EXPENSES 
  
  
  
  
  
Salaries and benefits(1) 
 (103) (2,103) 
 (2,207)
Other operating expenses(5) (69) (163) (399) 
 (636)
Depreciation expense
 (3) (20) (71) 
 (94)
Amortization of intangible assets
 
 
 (55) 
 (55)
Total expenses(6) (72) (286) (2,628) 
 (2,992)
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME(6) (72) (278) 1,019
 
 663
Other income (expense), net5
 (4) 
 31
 (10) 22
Income from Group undertakings
 191
 364
 86
 (641) 
Expenses due to Group undertakings(10) (34) (141) (456) 641
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 (60) 
 
 (60)
Interest expense(42) (16) (63) (5) 
 (126)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(53) 65
 (178) 675
 (10) 499
Income taxes
 23
 
 (145) 
 (122)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(53) 88
 (178) 530
 (10) 377
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 9
 
 (9) 
 
Equity account for subsidiaries418
 320
 150
 
 (888) 
NET INCOME (LOSS)365
 417
 (28) 521
 (898) 377
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (12) 
 (12)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$365
 $417
 $(28) $509
 $(898) $365

134

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

28. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
Comprehensive income$522
 $565
 $74
 $636
 $(1,263) $534
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (12) 
 (12)
Comprehensive income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$522
 $565
 $74
 $624
 $(1,263) $522


149135

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

30.28. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2012Year Ended December 31, 2012
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
    (millions)        (millions)    
REVENUES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Commissions and fees$
 $
 $
 $3,458
 $
 $3,458
$
 $
 $
 $3,458
 $
 $3,458
Investment income
 
 1
 17
 
 18

 
 1
 17
 
 18
Other income
 
 
 4
 
 4

 
 
 4
 
 4
Total revenues
 
 1
 3,479
 
 3,480

 
 1
 3,479
 
 3,480
EXPENSES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Salaries and benefits(2) 
 (96) (2,377) 
 (2,475)(2) 
 (96) (2,377) 
 (2,475)
Other operating expenses(4) (82) (79) (416) 
 (581)(6) (80) (78) (436) 
 (600)
Depreciation expense
 (1) (15) (63) 
 (79)
 (1) (15) (63) 
 (79)
Amortization of intangible assets
 
 
 (59) 
 (59)
 
 
 (59) 
 (59)
Goodwill impairment charge
 
 
 (492) 
 (492)
 
 
 (492) 
 (492)
Net loss on disposal of operations
 
 
 (3) 
 (3)
Total expenses(6) (83) (190) (3,410) 
 (3,689)(8) (81) (189) (3,427) 
 (3,705)
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME(6) (83) (189) 69
 
 (209)(8) (81) (188) 52
 
 (225)
Other income (expense), net2
 (2) (1) 17
 
 16
Income from Group undertakings
 201
 316
 111
 (628) 

 201
 316
 111
 (628) 
Expenses due to Group undertakings
 (67) (147) (414) 628
 

 (67) (147) (414) 628
 
Interest expense(43) (7) (70) (8) 
 (128)(43) (7) (70) (8) 
 (128)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(49) 44
 (90) (242) 
 (337)(49) 44
 (90) (242) 
 (337)
Income taxes
 31
 34
 (166) 
 (101)
 31
 34
 (166) 
 (101)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(49) 75
 (56) (408) 
 (438)(49) 75
 (56) (408) 
 (438)
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 8
 
 (3) 
 5

 8
 
 (3) 
 5
Equity account for subsidiaries(397) (480) (172) 
 1,049
 
(397) (480) (172) 
 1,049
 
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS(446) (397) (228) (411) 1,049
 (433)
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 
NET (LOSS) INCOME(446) (397) (228) (411) 1,049
 (433)
NET LOSS(446) (397) (228) (411) 1,049
 (433)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (13) 
 (13)
 
 
 (13) 
 (13)
NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$(446) $(397) $(228) $(424) $1,049
 $(446)
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$(446) $(397) $(228) $(424) $1,049
 $(446)













150136

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

30.28. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
Comprehensive loss$(552) $(494) $(263) $(519) $1,289
 $(539)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (13) 
 (13)
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(552) $(494) $(263) $(532) $1,289
 $(552)


151

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
 Year Ended December 31, 2011
 
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
REVENUES 
  
  
  
  
  
Commissions and fees$
 $
 $
 $3,414
 $
 $3,414
Investment income
 
 2
 29
 
 31
Other income
 
 
 2
 
 2
Total revenues
 
 2
 3,445
 
 3,447
EXPENSES 
  
  
  
  
  
Salaries and benefits(3) 
 (69) (2,015) 
 (2,087)
Other operating expenses(17) 32
 (98) (573) 
 (656)
Depreciation expense
 
 (14) (60) 
 (74)
Amortization of intangible assets
 
 
 (68) 
 (68)
Net gain on disposal of operations
 
 
 4
 
 4
Total expenses(20) 32
 (181) (2,712) 
 (2,881)
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME(20) 32
 (179) 733
 
 566
Income from Group undertakings
 186
 324
 119
 (629) 
Expenses due to Group undertakings
 (80) (134) (415) 629
 
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs
 (171) 
 
 
 (171)
Interest expense(34) (17) (97) (8) 
 (156)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(54) (50) (86) 429
 
 239
Income taxes
 59
 27
 (117) (1) (32)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(54) 9
 (59) 312
 (1) 207
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 8
 
 4
 
 12
Equity account for subsidiaries258
 229
 (8) 
 (479) 
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS204
 246
 (67) 316
 (480) 219
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 1
 
 1
NET INCOME (LOSS)204
 246
 (67) 317
 (480) 220
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (16) 
 (16)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$204
 $246
 $(67) $301
 $(480) $204













152

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 Year Ended December 31, 2011
 
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
Comprehensive income (loss)$1
 $48
 $(148) $114
 $1
 $16
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (15) 
 (15)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings$1
 $48
 $(148) $99
 $1
 $1













153137

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

30.28. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
As at December 31, 2013As at December 31, 2014
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
    (millions)        (millions)    
ASSETS                      
CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$3
 $3
 $
 $790
 $
 $796
$9
 $2
 $
 $624
 $
 $635
Accounts receivable, net
 
 4
 1,037
 
 1,041

 
 4
 1,040
 
 1,044
Fiduciary assets
 
 
 8,412
 
 8,412

 
 
 8,948
 
 8,948
Deferred tax assets
 
 
 16
 (1) 15

 
 
 12
 
 12
Other current assets1
 21
 10
 186
 (21) 197
1
 27
 10
 205
 (29) 214
Amounts due from Group undertakings4,051
 903
 1,317
 1,484
 (7,755) 
3,674
 924
 1,057
 1,114
 (6,769) 
Total current assets4,055
 927
 1,331
 11,925
 (7,777) 10,461
3,684
 953
 1,071
 11,943
 (6,798) 10,853
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries
 2,838
 1,021
 
 (3,859) 

 2,536
 721
 
 (3,257) 
Fixed assets, net
 15
 51
 415
 
 481

 20
 42
 421
 
 483
Goodwill
 
 
 2,838
 
 2,838

 
 
 2,937
 
 2,937
Other intangible assets, net
 
 
 353
 
 353

 
 
 450
 
 450
Investments in associates
 156
 
 20
 
 176

 147
 
 22
 
 169
Deferred tax assets
 
 
 7
 
 7

 
 
 9
 
 9
Pension benefits asset
 
 
 278
 
 278

 
 
 314
 
 314
Other non-current assets4
 9
 5
 188
 
 206
3
 8
 2
 207
 
 220
Non-current amounts due from Group undertakings
 518
 690
 
 (1,208) 

 518
 740
 
 (1,258) 
Total non-current assets4
 3,536
 1,767
 4,099
 (5,067) 4,339
3
 3,229
 1,505
 4,360
 (4,515) 4,582
TOTAL ASSETS$4,059
 $4,463
 $3,098
 $16,024
 $(12,844) $14,800
$3,687
 $4,182
 $2,576
 $16,303
 $(11,313) $15,435
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                      
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Fiduciary liabilities$
 $
 $
 $8,412
 $
 $8,412
$
 $
 $
 $8,948
 $
 $8,948
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses2
 1
 28
 555
 
 586
1
 4
 30
 584
 
 619
Income taxes payable
 3
 
 39
 (21) 21

 
 7
 55
 (29) 33
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
 15
 
 
 
 15

 17
 149
 1
 
 167
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 
 25
 
 25

 
 
 21
 
 21
Other current liabilities62
 15
 38
 300
 
 415
67
 11
 46
 320
 
 444
Amounts due to Group undertakings
 4,760
 1,662
 1,333
 (7,755) 

 4,374
 1,499
 896
 (6,769) 
Total current liabilities64
 4,794
 1,728
 10,664
 (7,776) 9,474
68
 4,406
 1,731
 10,825
 (6,798) 10,232
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries985
 
 
 
 (985) 
838
 
 
 
 (838) 
Long-term debt795
 782
 733
 1
 
 2,311
796
 765
 581
 
 
 2,142
Liabilities for pension benefits
 
 
 136
 
 136

 
 
 284
 
 284
Deferred tax liabilities
 1
 
 55
 
 56

 
 
 128
 
 128
Provisions for liabilities
 
 
 206
 
 206

 
 
 194
 
 194
Other non-current liabilities
 
 48
 326
 
 374

 
 17
 372
 
 389
Non-current amounts due to Group undertakings
 
 518
 690
 (1,208) 

 
 518
 740
 (1,258) 
Total non-current liabilities1,780
 783
 1,299
 1,414
 (2,193) 3,083
1,634
 765
 1,116
 1,718
 (2,096) 3,137
TOTAL LIABILITIES$1,844
 $5,577
 $3,027
 $12,078
 $(9,969) $12,557
$1,702
 $5,171
 $2,847
 $12,543
 $(8,894) $13,369

154138

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

30.28. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 As at December 31, 2014
 Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
 
 
 59
 
 59
            
EQUITY 
  
  
  
  
  
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity1,985
 (989) (271) 3,679
 (2,419) 1,985
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 22
 
 22
Total equity1,985
 (989) (271) 3,701
 (2,419) 2,007
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$3,687
 $4,182
 $2,576
 $16,303
 $(11,313) $15,435


139

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

28. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 As at December 31, 2013
 
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$3
 $3
 $
 $790
 $
 $796
Accounts receivable, net
 
 4
 1,037
 
 1,041
Fiduciary assets
 
 
 8,412
 
 8,412
Deferred tax assets
 
 
 16
 (1) 15
Other current assets1
 21
 10
 186
 (21) 197
Amounts due by group undertakings4,051
 903
 1,317
 1,484
 (7,755) 
Total current assets4,055
 927
 1,331
 11,925
 (7,777) 10,461
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries
 2,838
 1,021
 
 (3,859) 
Fixed assets, net
 15
 51
 415
 
 481
Goodwill
 
 
 2,838
 
 2,838
Other intangible assets, net
 
 
 353
 
 353
Investments in associates
 156
 
 20
 
 176
Deferred tax assets
 
 
 7
 
 7
Pension benefits asset
 
 
 278
 
 278
Other non-current assets4
 9
 5
 188
 
 206
Non-current amounts due by group undertakings
 518
 690
 
 (1,208) 
Total non-current assets4
 3,536
 1,767
 4,099
 (5,067) 4,339
TOTAL ASSETS$4,059
 $4,463
 $3,098
 $16,024
 $(12,844) $14,800
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY           
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
Fiduciary liabilities$
 $
 $
 $8,412
 $
 $8,412
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses2
 1
 28
 555
 
 586
Income taxes payable
 3
 
 39
 (21) 21
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
 15
 
 
 
 15
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 
 25
 
 25
Other current liabilities62
 15
 38
 300
 
 415
Amounts due to group undertakings
 4,760
 1,662
 1,333
 (7,755) 
Total current liabilities64
 4,794
 1,728
 10,664
 (7,776) 9,474
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries985
 
 
 
 (985) 
Long-term debt795
 782
 733
 1
 
 2,311
Liabilities for pension benefits
 
 
 136
 
 136
Deferred tax liabilities
 1
 
 55
 
 56
Provisions for liabilities
 
 
 206
 
 206
Other non-current liabilities
 
 48
 326
 
 374
Non-current amounts due to group undertakings
 
 518
 690
 (1,208) 
Total non-current liabilities1,780
 783
 1,299
 1,414
 (2,193) 3,083
TOTAL LIABILITIES$1,844
 $5,577
 $3,027
 $12,078
 $(9,969) $12,557

140

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

28. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 As at December 31, 2013
 Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
EQUITY 
  
  
  
  
  
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity2,215
 (1,114) 71
 3,918
 (2,875) 2,215
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 28
 
 28
Total equity2,215
 (1,114) 71
 3,946
 (2,875) 2,243
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$4,059
 $4,463
 $3,098
 $16,024
 $(12,844) $14,800


155141

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 As at December 31, 2012
 
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$1
 $
 $
 $499
 $
 $500
Accounts receivable, net
 
 
 933
 
 933
Fiduciary assets
 
 
 9,271
 
 9,271
Deferred tax assets
 
 
 13
 
 13
Other current assets1
 31
 38
 114
 (3) 181
Amounts due by group undertakings4,091
 993
 1,292
 864
 (7,240) 
Total current assets4,093
 1,024
 1,330
 11,694
 (7,243) 10,898
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries
 2,407
 553
 
 (2,960) 
Fixed assets, net
 11
 63
 394
 
 468
Goodwill
 
 
 2,827
 
 2,827
Other intangible assets, net
 
 
 385
 
 385
Investments in associates
 143
 
 31
 
 174
Deferred tax assets
 
 
 18
 
 18
Pension benefits asset
 
 
 136
 
 136
Other non-current assets5
 3
 41
 157
 
 206
Non-current amounts due by group undertakings
 
 641
 
 (641) 
Total non-current assets5
 2,564
 1,298
 3,948
 (3,601) 4,214
TOTAL ASSETS$4,098
 $3,588
 $2,628
 $15,642
 $(10,844) $15,112
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY           
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
Fiduciary liabilities$
 $
 $
 $9,271
 $
 $9,271
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses2
 
 
 539
 
 541
Income taxes payable
 4
 
 18
 (3) 19
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
 15
 
 
 
 15
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 
 21
 
 21
Other current liabilities60
 
 73
 194
 
 327
Amounts due to group undertakings
 4,951
 1,246
 1,043
 (7,240) 
Total current liabilities62
 4,970
 1,319
 11,086
 (7,243) 10,194
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries1,542
 
 
 
 (1,542) 
Long-term debt795
 274
 1,268
 1
 
 2,338
Liabilities for pension benefits
 
 
 282
 
 282
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 
 18
 
 18
Provisions for liabilities
 
 
 180
 
 180
Other non-current liabilities
 5
 7
 363
 
 375
Non-current amounts due to group undertakings
 
 
 641
 (641) 
Total non-current liabilities2,337
 279
 1,275
 1,485
 (2,183) 3,193
TOTAL LIABILITIES$2,399
 $5,249
 $2,594
 $12,571
 $(9,426) $13,387

156

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 As at December 31, 2012
 Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
EQUITY 
  
  
  
  
  
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity1,699
 (1,661) 34
 3,045
 (1,418) 1,699
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 26
 
 26
Total equity1,699
 (1,661) 34
 3,071
 (1,418) 1,725
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$4,098
 $3,588
 $2,628
 $15,642
 $(10,844) $15,112


157

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

30.28. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2013Year Ended December 31, 2014
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
    (millions)        (millions)    
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES$4
 $125
 $7
 $662
 $(237) $561
$(35) $387
 $265
 $212
 $(352) $477
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets
 
 3
 9
 
 12

 
 1
 6
 (1) 6
Additions to fixed assets
 (7) (11) (94) 
 (112)
 (9) (10) (95) 1
 (113)
Additions to intangibles assets
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
 
 
 (4) 
 (4)
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
 (237) (230) (30) 467
 (30)
 
 
 (241) 
 (241)
Payments to acquire other investments
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
 
 
 (10) 
 (10)
Proceeds from sale of associates
 
 
 4
 
 4
Proceeds from sale of operations, net of cash disposed
 
 230
 257
 (467) 20

 
 
 86
 
 86
Proceeds from intercompany investing activities383
 211
 36
 60
 (690) 
361
 
 120
 435
 (916) 
Repayments of intercompany investing activities(347) (442) (120) (780) 1,689
 

 (53) (131) (46) 230
 
Additional investment in subsidiaries(31) 
 
 
 31
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities36
 (475) (92) (588) 999
 (120)330
 (62) (20) 131
 (655) (276)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Senior notes issued
 522
 
 
 
 522
Debt issuance costs
 (8) 
 
 
 (8)
 
 
 (3) 
 (3)
Repayments of debt
 (15) (521) 
 
 (536)
 (15) 
 
 
 (15)
Tender premium on extinguishment of senior notes
 
 (65) 
 
 (65)
Repurchase of shares(213) 
 
 
 
 (213)
Proceeds from issue of shares155
 
 
 
 
 155
134
 
 
 31
 (31) 134
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
 
 
 2
 
 2

 
 
 5
 
 5
Dividends paid(193) 
 (230) (7) 237
 (193)(210) 
 
 (352) 352
 (210)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (4) 
 (4)
 (4) 
 
 
 (4)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (10) 
 (10)
 
 
 (17) 
 (17)
Proceeds from intercompany financing activities
 321
 901
 467
 (1,689) 

 46
 4
 180
 (230) 
Repayments of intercompany financing activities
 (467) 
 (223) 690
 

 (353) (249) (314) 916
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(38) 353
 85
 225
 (762) (137)
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS2
 3
 
 299
 
 304
Net cash used in financing activities(289) (326) (245) (470) 1,007
 (323)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS6
 (1) 
 (127) 
 (122)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
 
 (8) 
 (8)
 
 
 (39) 
 (39)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR1
 
 
 499
 
 500
3
 3
 
 790
 
 796
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR$3
 $3
 $
 $790
 $
 $796
$9
 $2
 $
 $624
 $
 $635


158142

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

30.28. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2012Year Ended December 31, 2013
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
    (millions)        (millions)    
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES$(23) $1,504
 $(44) $(97) $(815) $525
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES$4
 $125
 $7
 $662
 $(237) $561
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets
 
 
 5
 
 5

 
 3
 9
 
 12
Additions to fixed assets
 (7) (19) (109) 
 (135)
 (7) (11) (94) 
 (112)
Additions to intangible assets
 
 
 (2) 
 (2)
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
 
 
 (33) 
 (33)
 (237) (230) (30) 467
 (30)
Payments to acquire other investments
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Proceeds from sale of associates
 
 
 4
 
 4
Proceeds from sale of operations, net of cash disposed
 
 
 
 
 

 
 230
 257
 (467) 20
Proceeds from intercompany investing activities256
 216
 44
 1,230
 (1,746) 
383
 211
 36
 60
 (690) 
Repayments of intercompany investing activities
 (318) (10) (81) 409
 
(347) (442) (120) (780) 1,689
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities256
 (109) 15
 1,003
 (1,337) (172)36
 (475) (92) (588) 999
 (120)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Senior notes issued
 522
 
 
 
 522
Debt issuance costs
 (8) 
 
 
 (8)
Repayments of debt
 (15) 
 
 
 (15)
 (15) (521) 
 
 (536)
Proceeds from issue of other debt
 1
 
 
 
 1
Repurchase of shares(100) 
 
 
 
 (100)
Tender premium on extinguishment of senior notes
 
 (65) 
 
 (65)
Proceeds from issue of shares53
 
 
 
 
 53
155
 
 
 
 
 155
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
 
 
 2
 
 2

 
 
 2
 
 2
Dividends paid(185) 
 
 (815) 815
 (185)(193) 
 (230) (7) 237
 (193)
Proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interest
 
 
 3
 
 3
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (39) 
 (39)
 
 
 (4) 
 (4)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (11) 
 (11)
 
 
 (10) 
 (10)
Proceeds from intercompany financing activities
 81
 
 328
 (409) 

 321
 901
 467
 (1,689) 
Repayments of intercompany financing activities
 (1,462) (134) (150) 1,746
 

 (467) 
 (223) 690
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(232) (1,395) (134) (682) 2,152
 (291)(38) 353
 85
 225
 (762) (137)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS1
 
 (163) 224
 
 62
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS2
 3
 
 299
 
 304
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
 
 2
 
 2

 
 
 (8) 
 (8)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR
 
 163
 273
 
 436
1
 
 
 499
 
 500
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR$1
 $
 $
 $499
 $
 $500
$3
 $3
 $
 $790
 $
 $796


159143

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

30.28. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2011Year Ended December 31, 2012
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
    (millions)        (millions)    
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES$44
 $316
 $134
 $131
 $(186) $439
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES$(23) $1,504
 $(44) $(97) $(815) $525
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets
 
 
 13
 
 13

 
 
 5
 
 5
Additions to fixed assets
 (4) (21) (86) 
 (111)
 (7) (19) (109) 
 (135)
Additions to intangible assets
 
 
 (2) 
 (2)
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
 
 
 (10) 
 (10)
 
 
 (33) 
 (33)
Acquisitions of investments in associates
 
 
 (2) 
 (2)
Payments to acquire other investments
 
 
 (5) 
 (5)
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Proceeds from sale of operations, net of cash disposed
 
 
 14
 
 14
Proceeds from intercompany investing activities
 
 128
 224
 (352) 
256
 216
 44
 1,230
 (1,746) 
Repayments of intercompany investing activities(711) (430) 
 (101) 1,242
 

 (318) (10) (81) 409
 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(711) (434) 107
 47
 890
 (101)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities256
 (109) 15
 1,003
 (1,337) (172)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Repayments of revolving credit facility
 
 (90) 
 
 (90)
Senior notes issued794
 
 
 
 
 794
Debt issuance costs(7) (5) 
 
 
 (12)
Repayments of debt
 (500) (411) 
 
 (911)
 (15) 
 
 
 (15)
Proceeds from issue of term loan
 300
 
 
 
 300
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes
 (158) 
 
 
 (158)
Proceeds from issue of other debt
 1
 
 
 
 1
Repurchase of shares(100) 
 
 
 
 (100)
Proceeds from issue of shares60
 
 
 
 
 60
53
 
 
 
 
 53
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
 
 
 5
 
 5

 
 
 2
 
 2
Dividends paid(180) 
 
 (186) 186
 (180)(185) 
 
 (815) 815
 (185)
Proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interest
 
 
 3
 
 3
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests
 (4) 
 (5) 
 (9)
 
 
 (39) 
 (39)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (13) 
 (13)
 
 
 (11) 
 (11)
Cash received on intercompany financing activities
 741
 347
 154
 (1,242) 

 81
 
 328
 (409) 
Cash paid on intercompany financing activities
 (256) 
 (96) 352
 

 (1,462) (134) (150) 1,746
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities667
 118
 (154) (141) (704) (214)
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
 
 87
 37
 
 124
Net cash used in financing activities(232) (1,395) (134) (682) 2,152
 (291)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS1
 
 (163) 224
 
 62
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
 
 (4) 
 (4)
 
 
 2
 
 2
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR
 
 76
 240
 
 316

 
 163
 273
 
 436
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR$
 $
 $163
 $273
 $
 $436
$1
 $
 $
 $499
 $
 $500


160144

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statementsWillis Group Holdings plc


31.29.FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES
On March 17, 2011, the Company issued senior notes totaling $800 million in a registered public offering. These debt securities were issued by Willis Group Holdings (‘Holdings Debt Securities’) and are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s subsidiaries. Therefore, the Company is providing the condensed consolidating financial information below. The following 100 percent directly or indirectly owned subsidiaries fully and unconditionally guarantee the Holdings Debt Securities on a joint and several basis: Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited (previously registered as Trinity Acquisition plc), Willis Group Limited and Willis North America (the ‘Guarantors’).
The guarantor structure described above differs from the guarantor structure associated with the senior notes issued by Willis North America (the ‘Willis North America Debt Securities’) (and for which condensed consolidating financial information is presented in Note 30) in that Willis Group Holdings is the Parent Issuer and Willis North America is a subsidiary guarantor.
Presented below is condensed consolidating financial information for:

(i)Willis Group Holdings, which is the Parent Issuer;

(ii)
the Guarantors, which are all 100 percent directly or indirectly owned subsidiaries of the parent;

(iii)Other, which are the non-guarantor subsidiaries, on a combined basis;

(iv)Consolidating adjustments; and

(v)the Consolidated Company.
The equity method has been used for investments in subsidiaries in the condensed consolidating balance sheets for the year ended December 31, 20132014 of Willis Group Holdings and the Guarantors.


Restatement to 2011 and 2012 financial information

Regulation S-X, Article 3, Rule 3-10, allows for the presentation of condensed consolidating financial information. In accordance with these rules, the condensed consolidating financial information should be presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, except that (i) the guarantor and non-guarantor information is presented on a combined rather than consolidated basis, which requires the elimination of intra-entity activity and (ii) investments in subsidiaries are required to be presented under the equity method of accounting. Subsequent to the issuance of our 2012 financial statements, management determined that certain balances were not presented in accordance with the above principles and have therefore restated our condensed consolidating financial information to reflect (i) gross, rather than net, presentation of intercompany balance sheet positions, (ii) dividends received from subsidiaries as reductions to the equity method investment balances opposed to as component of investment income from group undertakings, and (iii) appropriate push down accounting for goodwill.

The impacts of these changes on the previously reported 2012 and 2011 financial statements are shown in the tables below.


161145

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

31. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of operations for the year ended 31 December 2012     
Willis Group Holdings - the Parent Issuer     
Operating loss$(6) $
 $(6)
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(446) 
 (446)
The Guarantors     
Operating loss$(261) $(11) $(272)
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(389) (8) (397)
Other     
Operating income (loss)$122
 $(53) $69
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(118) (306) (424)
Consolidating adjustments     
Operating (loss) income$(64) $64
 $
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings507
 314
 821
      
 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of operations for the year ended 31 December 2011     
Willis Group Holdings - the Parent Issuer     
Operating loss$(20) $
 $(20)
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings204
 
 204
The Guarantors     
Operating loss$(136) $(11) $(147)
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings174
 72
 246
Other     
Operating income (loss)$754
 $(21) $733
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings137
 164
 301
Consolidating adjustments     
Operating (loss) income$(32) $32
 $
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(311) (236) (547)


162

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

31. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2012     
Willis Group Holdings - the Parent Issuer     
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(552) $
 $(552)
The Guarantors     
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(486) $(8) $(494)
Other     
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(226) $(306) $(532)
Consolidating adjustments     
Comprehensive income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$712
 $314
 $1,026
      
 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2011     
Willis Group Holdings - the Parent Issuer     
Comprehensive income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$1
 $
��$1
The Guarantors     
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(24) $72
 $48
Other     
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(65) $164
 $99
Consolidating adjustments     
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings$89
 $(236) $(147)

 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating balance sheet at 31 December 2012     
Willis Group Holdings - the Parent Issuer     
Total assets$2,557
 $1,541
 $4,098
Total liabilities858
 1,541
 2,399
Total equity1,699
 
 1,699
The Guarantors     
Total assets$92
 $4,832
 $4,924
Total liabilities1,667
 4,918
 6,585
Total equity(1,575) (86) (1,661)
Other     
Total assets$17,125
 $(1,483) $15,642
Total liabilities11,851
 720
 12,571
Total equity5,274
 (2,203) 3,071
Consolidating adjustments     
Total assets$(4,662) $(4,890) $(9,552)
Total liabilities(989) (7,179) (8,168)
Total equity(3,673) 2,289
 (1,384)


163

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

31. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 December 2012     
Willis Group Holdings - the Parent Issuer     
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(42) $19
 $(23)
Net cash provided by investing activities
 256
 256
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities43
 (275) (232)
The Guarantors     
Net cash provided by operating activities$849
 $611
 $1,460
Net cash used in investing activities(26) (178) (204)
Net cash used in financing activities(986) (433) (1,419)
Other     
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$431
 $(528) $(97)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(146) 1,149
 1,003
Net cash used in financing activities(61) (621) (682)
Consolidating adjustments     
Net cash used in operating activities$(713) $(102) $(815)
Net cash used in investing activities
 (1,227) (1,227)
Net cash provided by financing activities713
 1,329
 2,042
      
 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 December 2011     
Willis Group Holdings - the Parent Issuer     
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(41) $85
 $44
Net cash used in investing activities
 (711) (711)
Net cash provided by financing activities41
 626
 667
The Guarantors     
Net cash provided by operating activities$272
 $178
 $450
Net cash used in investing activities(25) (42) (67)
Net cash used in financing activities(160) (136) (296)
Other     
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$1,269
 $(1,138) $131
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(76) 123
 47
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,156) 1,015
 (141)
Consolidating adjustments     
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(1,061) $875
 $(186)
Net cash provided by investing activities
 630
 630
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities1,061
 (1,505) (444)


164

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

31.29. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2013Year Ended December 31, 2014
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
(millions)(millions)
REVENUES 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Commissions and fees$
 $8
 $3,625
 $
 $3,633
$
 $8
 $3,759
 $
 $3,767
Investment income
 
 15
 
 15

 
 16
 
 16
Other income
 
 7
 
 7

 
 19
 
 19
Total revenues
 8
 3,647
 
 3,655

 8
 3,794
 
 3,802
EXPENSES 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Salaries and benefits(1) (103) (2,103) 
 (2,207)(1) (81) (2,232) 
 (2,314)
Other operating expenses
 (236) (380) 
 (616)(16) (133) (510) 
 (659)
Depreciation expense
 (23) (71) 
 (94)
 (21) (71) 
 (92)
Amortization of intangible assets
 
 (55) 
 (55)
 
 (54) 
 (54)
Net gain on disposal of operations
 
 12
 (10) 2
Restructuring expenses
 (14) (22) 
 (36)
Total expenses(1) (362) (2,597) (10) (2,970)(17) (249) (2,889) 
 (3,155)
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME(1) (354) 1,050
 (10) 685
(17) (241) 905
 
 647
Other (expense) income, net(15) (220) 11
 230
 6
Income from Group undertakings
 466
 86
 (552) 

 424
 102
 (526) 
Expenses due to Group undertakings(10) (86) (456) 552
 

 (102) (424) 526
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 (60) 
 
 (60)
Interest expense(42) (79) (5) 
 (126)(43) (80) (12) 
 (135)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(53) (113) 675
 (10) 499
(75) (219) 582
 230
 518
Income taxes
 23
 (145) 
 (122)
 49
 (208) 
 (159)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(53) (90) 530
 (10) 377
(75) (170) 374
 230
 359
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 9
 (9) 
 

 10
 4
 
 14
Equity account for subsidiaries418
 498
 
 (916) 
437
 588
 
 (1,025) 
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS365
 417
 521
 (926) 377
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 
 
NET INCOME365
 417
 521
 (926) 377
362
 428
 378
 (795) 373
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 (12) 
 (12)
 
 (11) 
 (11)
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$365
 $417
 $509
 $(926) $365
$362
 $428
 $367
 $(795) $362


165146

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

29. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
Willis
Group
Holdings—the Parent Issuer
 The Guarantors Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
 (millions)
Comprehensive (loss) income$(11) $69
 $49
 $(113) $(6)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 (5) 
 (5)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(11) $69
 $44
 $(113) $(11)


147

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

31.29. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
 Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
 (millions)
REVENUES 
  
  
  
  
Commissions and fees$
 $8
 $3,625
 $
 $3,633
Investment income
 
 15
 
 15
Other income
 
 7
 
 7
Total revenues
 8
 3,647
 
 3,655
EXPENSES 
  
  
  
  
Salaries and benefits(1) (103) (2,103) 
 (2,207)
Other operating expenses(5) (232) (399) 
 (636)
Depreciation expense
 (23) (71) 
 (94)
Amortization of intangible assets
 
 (55) 
 (55)
Total expenses(6) (358) (2,628) 
 (2,992)
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME(6) (350) 1,019
 
 663
Other income (expense), net5
 (4) 31
 (10) 22
Income from Group undertakings
 466
 86
 (552) 
Expenses due to Group undertakings(10) (86) (456) 552
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 (60) 
 
 (60)
Interest expense(42) (79) (5) 
 (126)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(53) (113) 675
 (10) 499
Income taxes
 23
 (145) 
 (122)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(53) (90) 530
 (10) 377
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 9
 (9) 
 
Equity account for subsidiaries418
 498
 
 (916) 
NET INCOME365
 417
 521
 (926) 377
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 (12) 
 (12)
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$365
 $417
 $509
 $(926) $365


148

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

29. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Willis
Group
Holdings—the Parent Issuer
 The Guarantors Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
 (millions)
Comprehensive income$522
 $565
 $636
 $(1,189) $534
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 (12) 
 (12)
Comprehensive income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$522
 $565
 $624
 $(1,189) $522



166149

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statementsWillis Group Holdings plc

31.29. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2012Year Ended December 31, 2012
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
(millions)(millions)
REVENUES 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Commissions and fees$
 $
 $3,458
 $
 $3,458
$
 $
 $3,458
 $
 $3,458
Investment income
 1
 17
 
 18

 1
 17
 
 18
Other income
 
 4
 
 4

 
 4
 
 4
Total revenues
 1
 3,479
 
 3,480

 1
 3,479
 
 3,480
EXPENSES 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Salaries and benefits(2) (96) (2,377) 
 (2,475)(2) (96) (2,377) 
 (2,475)
Other operating expenses(4) (161) (416) 
 (581)(6) (158) (436) 
 (600)
Depreciation expense
 (16) (63) 
 (79)
 (16) (63) 
 (79)
Amortization of intangible assets
 
 (59) 
 (59)
 
 (59) 
 (59)
Goodwill impairment charge
 
 (492) 
 (492)
 
 (492) 
 (492)
Net loss on disposal of operations
 
 (3) 
 (3)
Total expenses(6) (273) (3,410) 
 (3,689)(8) (270) (3,427) 
 (3,705)
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME(6) (272) 69
 
 (209)(8) (269) 52
 
 (225)
Other income (expense), net2
 (3) 17
 
 16
Income from Group undertakings
 409
 111
 (520) 

 409
 111
 (520) 
Expenses due to Group undertakings
 (106) (414) 520
 

 (106) (414) 520
 
Interest expense(43) (77) (8) 
 (128)(43) (77) (8) 
 (128)
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(49) (46) (242) 
 (337)(49) (46) (242) 
 (337)
Income taxes
 65
 (166) 
 (101)
 65
 (166) 
 (101)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(49) 19
 (408) 
 (438)(49) 19
 (408) 
 (438)
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 8
 (3) 
 5

 8
 (3) 
 5
Equity account for subsidiaries(397) (424) 
 821
 
(397) (424) 
 821
 
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS(446) (397) (411) 821
 (433)
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 
 
NET LOSS(446) (397) (411) 821
 (433)(446) (397) (411) 821
 (433)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 (13) 
 (13)
 
 (13) 
 (13)
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$(446) $(397) $(424) $821
 $(446)$(446) $(397) $(424) $821
 $(446)


167150

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plcNotes to the financial statements

31.29. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
Willis
Group
Holdings—the Parent Issuer
 The Guarantors Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
 (millions)
Comprehensive loss$(552) $(494) $(519) $1,026
 $(539)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 (13) 
 (13)
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(552) $(494) $(532) $1,026
 $(552)



168

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

31. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

 Year Ended December 31, 2011
 
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
 (millions)
REVENUES 
  
  
  
  
Commissions and fees$
 $
 $3,414
 $
 $3,414
Investment income
 2
 29
 
 31
Other income
 
 2
 
 2
Total revenues
 2
 3,445
 
 3,447
EXPENSES 
  
  
  
  
Salaries and benefits(3) (69) (2,015) 
 (2,087)
Other operating expenses(17) (66) (573) 
 (656)
Depreciation expense
 (14) (60) 
 (74)
Amortization of intangible assets
 
 (68) 
 (68)
Net gain on disposal of operations
 
 4
 
 4
Total expenses(20) (149) (2,712) 
 (2,881)
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME(20) (147) 733
 
 566
Income from Group undertakings
 412
 119
 (531) 
Expenses due to Group undertakings
 (116) (415) 531
 
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs
 (171) 
 
 (171)
Interest expense(34) (114) (8) 
 (156)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(54) (136) 429
 
 239
Income taxes
 86
 (117) (1) (32)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(54) (50) 312
 (1) 207
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 8
 4
 
 12
Equity account for subsidiaries258
 288
 
 (546) 
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS204
 246
 316
 (547) 219
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 1
 
 1
NET INCOME204
 246
 317
 (547) 220
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 (16) 
 (16)
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$204
 $246
 $301
 $(547) $204



169151

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

31. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 Year Ended December 31, 2011
 
Willis
Group
Holdings—the Parent Issuer
 The Guarantors Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
 (millions)
Comprehensive income$1
 $48
 $114
 $(147) $16
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 (15) 
 (15)
Comprehensive income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$1
 $48
 $99
 $(147) $1









170

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

31.29. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
As at December 31, 2013As at December 31, 2014
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
(millions)(millions)
ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$3
 $3
 $790
 $
 $796
$9
 $2
 $624
 $
 $635
Accounts receivable, net
 4
 1,037
 
 1,041

 4
 1,040
 
 1,044
Fiduciary assets
 
 8,412
 
 8,412

 
 8,948
 
 8,948
Deferred tax assets
 
 16
 (1) 15

 
 12
 
 12
Other current assets1
 31
 186
 (21) 197
1
 37
 205
 (29) 214
Amounts due from group undertakings4,051
 975
 1,484
 (6,510) 
3,674
 731
 1,114
 (5,519) 
Total current assets4,055
 1,013
 11,925
 (6,532) 10,461
3,684
 774
 11,943
 (5,548) 10,853
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries
 3,788
 
 (3,788) 

 3,528
 
 (3,528) 
Fixed assets, net
 66
 415
 
 481

 62
 421
 
 483
Goodwill
 
 2,838
 
 2,838

 
 2,937
 
 2,937
Other intangible assets, net
 
 353
 
 353

 
 450
 
 450
Investments in associates
 156
 20
 
 176

 147
 22
 
 169
Deferred tax assets
 
 7
 
 7

 
 9
 
 9
Pension benefits asset
 
 278
 
 278

 
 314
 
 314
Other non-current assets4
 14
 188
 
 206
3
 10
 207
 
 220
Non-current amounts due from group undertakings
 690
 
 (690) 

 740
 
 (740) 
Total non-current assets4
 4,714
 4,099
 (4,478) 4,339
3
 4,487
 4,360
 (4,268) 4,582
TOTAL ASSETS$4,059
 $5,727
 $16,024
 $(11,010) $14,800
$3,687
 $5,261
 $16,303
 $(9,816) $15,435
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Fiduciary liabilities$
 $
 $8,412
 $
 $8,412
$
 $
 $8,948
 $
 $8,948
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses2
 29
 555
 
 586
1
 34
 584
 
 619
Income taxes payable
 3
 39
 (21) 21

 7
 55
 (29) 33
Short-term debt and current portion on long-term debt
 15
 
 
 15

 166
 1
 
 167
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 25
 
 25

 
 21
 
 21
Other current liabilities62
 53
 300
 
 415
67
 57
 320
 
 444
Amounts due to group undertakings
 5,177
 1,333
 (6,510) 

 4,623
 896
 (5,519) 
Total current liabilities64
 5,277
 10,664
 (6,531) 9,474
68
 4,887
 10,825
 (5,548) 10,232
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries985
 


 (985) 
838
 


 (838) 
Long-term debt795
 1,515
 1
 
 2,311
796
 1,346
 
 
 2,142
Liabilities for pension benefits
 
 136
 
 136

 
 284
 
 284
Deferred tax liabilities
 1
 55
 
 56

 
 128
 
 128
Provisions for liabilities
 
 206
 
 206

 
 194
 
 194
Other non-current liabilities
 48
 326
 
 374

 17
 372
 
 389
Non-current amounts due to group undertakings
 
 690
 (690) 

 
 740
 (740) 
Total non-current liabilities1,780
 1,564
 1,414
 (1,675) 3,083
1,634
 1,363
 1,718
 (1,578) 3,137
TOTAL LIABILITIES$1,844
 $6,841
 $12,078
 $(8,206) $12,557
$1,702
 $6,250
 $12,543
 $(7,126) $13,369

171

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

31. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)



Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 As at December 31, 2013
 Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 The
Guarantors
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
 (millions)
EQUITY 
  
  
  
  
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity2,215
 (1,114) 3,918
 (2,804) 2,215
Noncontrolling interests
 
 28
 
 28
Total equity2,215
 (1,114) 3,946
 (2,804) 2,243
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$4,059
 $5,727
 $16,024
 $(11,010) $14,800

172152

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

31.29. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 As at December 31, 2012
 
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
 (millions)
ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$1
 $
 $499
 $
 $500
Accounts receivable, net
 
 933
 
 933
Fiduciary assets
 
 9,271
 
 9,271
Deferred tax assets
 
 13
 
 13
Other current assets1
 69
 114
 (3) 181
Amounts due from group undertakings4,091
 1,027
 864
 (5,982) 
Total current assets4,093
 1,096
 11,694
 (5,985) 10,898
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries
 2,926
 
 (2,926) 
Fixed assets, net
 74
 394
 
 468
Goodwill
 
 2,827
 
 2,827
Other intangible assets, net
 
 385
 
 385
Investments in associates
 143
 31
 
 174
Deferred tax assets
 
 18
 
 18
Pension benefits asset
 
 136
 
 136
Other non-current assets5
 44
 157
 
 206
Non-current amounts due from group undertakings
 641
 
 (641) 
Total non-current assets5
 3,828
 3,948
 (3,567) 4,214
TOTAL ASSETS$4,098
 $4,924
 $15,642
 $(9,552) $15,112
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
  
  
  
  
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
Fiduciary liabilities$
 $
 $9,271
 $
 $9,271
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses2
 
 539
 
 541
Income taxes payable
 4
 18
 (3) 19
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
 15
 
 
 15
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 21
 
 21
Other current liabilities60
 73
 194
 
 327
Amounts due to group undertakings
 4,939
 1,043
 (5,982) 
Total current liabilities62
 5,031
 11,086
 (5,985) 10,194
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries1,542
 
 
 (1,542) 
Long-term debt795
 1,542
 1
 
 2,338
Liabilities for pension benefits
 
 282
 
 282
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 18
 
 18
Provisions for liabilities
 
 180
 
 180
Other non-current liabilities
 12
 363
 
 375
Non-current amounts due to group undertakings
 
 641
 (641) 
Total non-current liabilities2,337
 1,554
 1,485
 (2,183) 3,193
TOTAL LIABILITIES$2,399
 $6,585
 $12,571
 $(8,168) $13,387



 As at December 31, 2014
 Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 The
Guarantors
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
 (millions)
REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
 
 59
 
 59
          
EQUITY 
  
  
  
  
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity1,985
 (989) 3,679
 (2,690) 1,985
Noncontrolling interests
 
 22
 
 22
Total equity1,985
 (989) 3,701
 (2,690) 2,007
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$3,687
 $5,261
 $16,303
 $(9,816) $15,435

173153

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

31.29. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 As at December 31, 2012
 Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 The
Guarantors
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
 (millions)
EQUITY 
  
  
  
  
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity1,699
 (1,661) 3,045
 (1,384) 1,699
Noncontrolling interests
 
 26
 
 26
Total equity1,699
 (1,661) 3,071
 (1,384) 1,725
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$4,098
 $4,924
 $15,642
 $(9,552) $15,112
 As at December 31, 2013
 
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
 (millions)
ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$3
 $3
 $790
 $
 $796
Accounts receivable, net
 4
 1,037
 
 1,041
Fiduciary assets
 
 8,412
 
 8,412
Deferred tax assets
 
 16
 (1) 15
Other current assets1
 31
 186
 (21) 197
Amounts due from group undertakings4,051
 975
 1,484
 (6,510) 
Total current assets4,055
 1,013
 11,925
 (6,532) 10,461
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries
 3,788
 
 (3,788) 
Fixed assets, net
 66
 415
 
 481
Goodwill
 
 2,838
 
 2,838
Other intangible assets, net
 
 353
 
 353
Investments in associates
 156
 20
 
 176
Deferred tax assets
 
 7
 
 7
Pension benefits asset
 
 278
 
 278
Other non-current assets4
 14
 188
 
 206
Non-current amounts due from group undertakings
 690
 
 (690) 
Total non-current assets4
 4,714
 4,099
 (4,478) 4,339
TOTAL ASSETS$4,059
 $5,727
 $16,024
 $(11,010) $14,800
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
  
  
  
  
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
Fiduciary liabilities$
 $
 $8,412
 $
 $8,412
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses2
 29
 555
 
 586
Income taxes payable
 3
 39
 (21) 21
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
 15
 
 
 15
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 25
 
 25
Other current liabilities62
 53
 300
 
 415
Amounts due to group undertakings
 5,177
 1,333
 (6,510) 
Total current liabilities64
 5,277
 10,664
 (6,531) 9,474
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries985
 
 
 (985) 
Long-term debt795
 1,515
 1
 
 2,311
Liabilities for pension benefits
 
 136
 
 136
Deferred tax liabilities
 1
 55
 
 56
Provisions for liabilities
 
 206
 
 206
Other non-current liabilities
 48
 326
 
 374
Non-current amounts due to group undertakings
 
��690
 (690) 
Total non-current liabilities1,780
 1,564
 1,414
 (1,675) 3,083
TOTAL LIABILITIES$1,844
 $6,841
 $12,078
 $(8,206) $12,557




174154

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

31.29. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 As at December 31, 2013
 Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 The
Guarantors
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
 (millions)
EQUITY 
  
  
  
  
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity2,215
 (1,114) 3,918
 (2,804) 2,215
Noncontrolling interests
 
 28
 
 28
Total equity2,215
 (1,114) 3,946
 (2,804) 2,243
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$4,059
 $5,727
 $16,024
 $(11,010) $14,800


155

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

29. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2013Year Ended December 31, 2014
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
(millions)(millions)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES$4
 $(98) $662
 $(7) $561
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES$(35) $652
 $212
 $(352) $477
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets
 3
 9
 
 12

 1
 6
 (1) 6
Additions to fixed assets
 (18) (94) 
 (112)
 (19) (95) 1
 (113)
Additions to intangibles assets
 
 (7) 
 (7)
 
 (4) 
 (4)
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
 (237) (30) 237
 (30)
 
 (241) 
 (241)
Payments to acquire other investments
 
 (7) 
 (7)
 
 (10) 
 (10)
Proceeds from sale of associates
 
 4
 
 4
Proceeds from disposal of operations, net of cash disposed
 
 257
 (237) 20

 
 86
 
 86
Proceeds from intercompany investing activities383
 223
 60
 (666) 
361
 120
 435
 (916) 
Repayments of intercompany investing activities(347) (120) (780) 1,247
 

 (180) (46) 226
 
Additional investment in subsidiaries(31) 
 
 31
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities36
 (149) (588) 581
 (120)330
 (78) 131
 (659) (276)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Senior notes issued
 522
 
 
 522
Debt issuance costs
 (8) 
 
 (8)
 
 (3) 
 (3)
Repayments of debt
 (536) 
 
 (536)
 (15) 
 
 (15)
Tender premium on extinguishment of senior notes
 (65) 
 
 (65)
Repurchase of shares(213) 
 
 
 (213)
Proceeds from the issue of shares155
 
 
 
 155
134
 
 31
 (31) 134
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
 
 2
 
 2

 
 5
 
 5
Dividends paid(193) 
 (7) 7
 (193)(210) 
 (352) 352
 (210)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests
 
 (4) 
 (4)
 (4) 
 
 (4)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
 
 (10) 
 (10)
 
 (17) 
 (17)
Proceeds from intercompany financing activities
 780
 467
 (1,247) 

 46
 180
 (226) 
Repayments of intercompany financing activities
 (443) (223) 666
 

 (602) (314) 916
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(38) 250
 225
 (574) (137)
Net cash used in financing activities(289) (575) (470) 1,011
 (323)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS2
 3
 299
 
 304
6
 (1) (127) 
 (122)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
 (8) 
 (8)
 
 (39) 
 (39)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR1
 
 499
 
 500
3
 3
 790
 
 796
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR$3
 $3
 $790
 $
 $796
$9
 $2
 $624
 $
 $635


175156

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plcNotes to the financial statements

31.29. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2012Year Ended December 31, 2013
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
(millions)(millions)
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES$(23) $1,460
 $(97) $(815) $525
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES$4
 $(98) $662
 $(7) $561
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets
 
 5
 
 5

 3
 9
 
 12
Additions to fixed assets
 (26) (109) 
 (135)
 (18) (94) 
 (112)
Additions to intangible assets
 
 (2) 
 (2)
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
 
 (33) 
 (33)
 (237) (30) 237
 (30)
Payments to acquire other investments
 
 (7) 
 (7)
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Proceeds from sale of associates
 
 4
 
 4
Proceeds from sale of operations, net of cash disposed
 
 257
 (237) 20
Proceeds from intercompany investing activities256
 150
 1,230
 (1,636) 
383
 223
 60
 (666) 
Repayments of intercompany investing activities
 (328) (81) 409
 
(347) (120) (780) 1,247
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities256
 (204) 1,003
 (1,227) (172)36
 (149) (588) 581
 (120)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Senior notes issued
 522
 
 
 522
Debt issuance costs
 (8) 
 
 (8)
Repayments of debt
 (15) 
 
 (15)
 (536) 
 
 (536)
Proceeds from issue of other debt
 1
 
 
 1
Repurchase of shares(100) 
 
 
 (100)
Tender premium on extinguishment of senior notes
 (65) 
 
 (65)
Proceeds from the issue of shares53
 
 
 
 53
155
 
 
 
 155
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
 
 2
 
 2

 
 2
 
 2
Dividends paid(185) 
 (815) 815
 (185)(193) 
 (7) 7
 (193)
Proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interest
 
 3
 
 3
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests
 
 (39) 
 (39)
 
 (4) 
 (4)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
 
 (11) 
 (11)
 
 (10) 
 (10)
Proceeds from intercompany financing activities
 81
 328
 (409) 

 780
 467
 (1,247) 
Repayments of intercompany financing activities
 (1,486) (150) 1,636
 

 (443) (223) 666
 
Net cash used in financing activities(232) (1,419) (682) 2,042
 (291)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS1
 (163) 224
 
 62
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(38) 250
 225
 (574) (137)
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS2
 3
 299
 
 304
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
 2
 
 2

 
 (8) 
 (8)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR
 163
 273
 
 436
1
 
 499
 
 500
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR$1
 $
 $499
 $
 $500
$3
 $3
 $790
 $
 $796


176157

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statementsWillis Group Holdings plc

31.29. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR PARENT ISSUER, GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2011Year Ended December 31, 2012
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
Willis
Group
Holdings —
the Parent
Issuer
 
The
Guarantors
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
(millions)(millions)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
$44
 $450
 $131
 $(186) $439
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
$(23) $1,460
 $(97) $(815) $525
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets
 
 13
 
 13

 
 5
 
 5
Additions to fixed assets
 (25) (86) 
 (111)
 (26) (109) 
 (135)
Additions to intangible assets
 
 (2) 
 (2)
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
 
 (10) 
 (10)
 
 (33) 
 (33)
Acquisitions of investments in associates
 
 (2) 
 (2)
Payments to acquire other investments
 
 (5) 
 (5)
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Proceeds from sale of operations, net of cash disposed
 
 14
 
 14
Proceeds from intercompany investing activities
 96
 224
 (320) 
256
 150
 1,230
 (1,636) 
Repayments of intercompany investing activities(711) (138) (101) 950
 

 (328) (81) 409
 
Net cash used in investing activities(711) (67) 47
 630
 (101)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities256
 (204) 1,003
 (1,227) (172)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Repayments of revolving credit facility
 (90) 
 
 (90)
Senior notes issued794
 
 
 
 794
Debt issuance costs(7) (5) 
 
 (12)
Repayments of debt
 (911) 
 
 (911)
 (15) 
 
 (15)
Proceeds from the issue of term loan
 300
 
 
 300
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes
 (158) 
 
 (158)
Proceeds from the issue of other debt
 1
 
 
 1
Repurchase of shares(100) 
 
 
 (100)
Proceeds from issue of shares60
 
 
 
 60
53
 
 
 
 53
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
 
 5
 
 5

 
 2
 
 2
Dividends paid(180) 
 (186) 186
 (180)(185) 
 (815) 815
 (185)
Proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interest
 
 3
 
 3
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests
 (4) (5) 
 (9)
 
 (39) 
 (39)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
 
 (13) 
 (13)
 
 (11) 
 (11)
Proceeds from intercompany financing activities
 796
 154
 (950) 

 81
 328
 (409) 
Repayments of intercompany financing activities
 (224) (96) 320
 

 (1,486) (150) 1,636
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities667
 (296) (141) (444) (214)
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
 87
 37
 
 124
Net cash used in financing activities(232) (1,419) (682) 2,042
 (291)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS1
 (163) 224
 
 62
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
 (4) 
 (4)
 
 2
 
 2
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR
 76
 240
 
 316

 163
 273
 
 436
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR$
 $163
 $273
 $
 $436
$1
 $
 $499
 $
 $500


177158

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


32.30.FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES
Trinity Acquisition plcLimited (previously registered as Trinity Acquisition plc) has $525 million senior notes outstanding that were issued on August 15, 2013.
All direct obligations under the senior notes were jointly and severally, irrevocably and fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V, Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, Willis Group Limited and Willis North America, Inc, collectively the 'Other Guarantors', and with Willis Group Holdings, the 'Guarantor Companies'.
The guarantor structure described above differs from the guarantor structure associated with the senior notes issued by the Company and Willis North America (the ‘Willis North America Debt Securities’) in that Trinity Acquisition plcLimited is the issuer and not a subsidiary guarantor, and Willis North America, Inc. is a subsidiary guarantor.
Presented below is condensed consolidating financial information for:
(i)Willis Group Holdings, which is a guarantor, on a parent company only basis;
(ii)the Other Guarantors, which are all 100 percent directly or indirectly owned subsidiaries of the parent. Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V, Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited and TA I Limited are all direct or indirect parents of the issuer and Willis Group Limited and Willis North America Inc., are 100 percent directly or indirectly owned subsidiaries or the issuer;
(iii)Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, which is the issuer and is a 100 percent indirectly owned subsidiary of the parent;
(iv)Other, which are the non-guarantor subsidiaries, on a combined basis;
(v)Consolidating adjustments; and
(vi)the Consolidated Company.
The equity method has been used for investments in subsidiaries in the condensed consolidating balance sheets of Willis Group Holdings, the Other Guarantors and the Issuer.


Restatement to 2011 and 2012 financial information

Regulation S-X, Article 3, Rule 3-10, allows for the presentation of condensed consolidating financial information. In accordance with these rules, the condensed consolidating financial information should be presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, except that (i) the guarantor and non-guarantor information is presented on a combined rather than consolidated basis, which requires the elimination of intra-entity activity and (ii) investments in subsidiaries are required to be presented under the equity method of accounting. Subsequent to the issuance of our 2012 financial statements, management determined that certain balances were not presented in accordance with the above principles and have therefore restated our condensed consolidating financial information to reflect (i) gross, rather than net, presentation of intercompany balance sheet positions, (ii) dividends received from subsidiaries as reductions to the equity method investment balances opposed to as component of investment income from group undertakings, and (iii) appropriate push down accounting for goodwill.

The impacts of these changes on the previously reported 2012 and 2011 financial statements are shown in the tables below.


178

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

32. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of operations for the year ended 31 December 2012     
Willis Group Holdings     
Operating loss$(6) $
 $(6)
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(446) 
 (446)
The Other Guarantors     
Operating loss$(262) $(11) $(273)
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(389) (8) (397)
The Issuer     
Operating income$1
 $
 $1
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(427) 
 (427)
Other     
Operating income (loss)$122
 $(53) $69
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(118) (306) (424)
Consolidating adjustments     
Operating (loss) income$(64) $64
 $
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings934
 314
 1,248
      
 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of operations for the year ended 31 December 2011     
Willis Group Holdings     
Operating loss$(20) $
 $(20)
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings204
 
 204
The Other Guarantors     
Operating loss$(140) $(11) $(151)
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings174
 72
 246
The Issuer     
Operating income$4
 $
 $4
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings218
 (1) 217
Other     
Operating income (loss)$754
 $(21) $733
Net income attributable to Willis Group Holdings137
 164
 301
Consolidating adjustments     
Operating (loss) income$(32) $32
 $
Net loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings(529) (235) (764)


179159

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

32. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2012     
Willis Group Holdings     
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(552) $
 $(552)
The Other Guarantors     
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(486) $(8) $(494)
The Issuer     
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(528) $
 $(528)
Other     
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(226) $(306) $(532)
Consolidating adjustments     
Comprehensive income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$1,240
 $314
 $1,554
      
 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2011     
Willis Group Holdings     
Comprehensive income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$1
 $
 $1
The Other Guarantors     
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(24) $72
 $48
The Issuer     
Comprehensive income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$21
 $(1) $20
Other     
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(65) $164
 $99
Consolidating adjustments     
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings$68
 $(235) $(167)


180

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

32. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating balance sheet at 31 December 2012     
Willis Group Holdings     
Total assets$2,557
 $1,541
 $4,098
Total liabilities858
 1,541
 2,399
Total equity1,699
 
 1,699
The Other Guarantors     
Total assets$(208) $5,618
 $5,410
Total liabilities1,367
 5,704
 7,071
Total equity(1,575) (86) (1,661)
The Issuer     
Total assets$2,861
 $408
 $3,269
Total liabilities300
 492
 792
Total equity2,561
 (84) 2,477
Other     
Total assets$17,125
 $(1,483) $15,642
Total liabilities11,851
 720
 12,571
Total equity5,274
 (2,203) 3,071
Consolidating adjustments     
Total assets$(7,223) $(6,084) $(13,307)
Total liabilities(989) (8,457) (9,446)
Total equity(6,234) 2,373
 (3,861)

181

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

32. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 December 2012     
Willis Group Holdings     
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(42) $19
 $(23)
Net cash provided by investing activities
 256
 256
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities43
 (275) (232)
The Other Guarantors     
Net cash provided by operating activities$1,869
 $524
 $2,393
Net cash used in investing activities(26) (21) (47)
Net cash used in financing activities(2,006) (503) (2,509)
The Issuer     
Net cash provided by operating activities$1,269
 $87
 $1,356
Net cash used in investing activities
 (53) (53)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,269) (34) (1,303)
Other     
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$431
 $(528) $(97)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(146) 1,149
 1,003
Net cash used in financing activities(61) (621) (682)
Consolidating adjustments     
Net cash used in operating activities$(3,002) $(102) $(3,104)
Net cash used in investing activities
 (1,331) (1,331)
Net cash provided by financing activities3,002
 1,433
 4,435
      
 As previously reported Reclassifications As Reclassified
 (millions)
Condensed consolidating statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 December 2011     
Willis Group Holdings     
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(41) $85
 $44
Net cash used in investing activities
 (711) (711)
Net cash provided by financing activities41
 626
 667
The Other Guarantors     
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$209
 $(568) $(359)
Net cash used in investing activities(25) (33) (58)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(97) 601
 504
The Issuer     
Net cash provided by operating activities$110
 $746
 $856
Net cash used in investing activities
 (292) (292)
Net cash used in financing activities(110) (454) (564)
Other     
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$1,269
 $(1,138) $131
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(76) 123
 47
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,156) 1,015
 (141)
Consolidating adjustments     
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(1,108) $875
 $(233)
Net cash provided by investing activities
 913
 913
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities1,108
 (1,788) (680)


182

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

32.30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2013Year Ended December 31, 2014
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
    (millions)        (millions)    
REVENUES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Commissions and fees$
 $8
 $
 $3,625
 $
 $3,633
$
 $8
 $
 $3,759
 $
 $3,767
Investment income
 
 
 15
 
 15

 
 
 16
 
 16
Other income
 
 
 7
 
 7

 
 
 19
 
 19
Total revenues
 8
 
 3,647
 
 3,655

 8
 
 3,794
 
 3,802
EXPENSES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Salaries and benefits(1) (103) 
 (2,103) 
 (2,207)(1) (81) 
 (2,232) 
 (2,314)
Other operating expenses
 (235) (1) (380) 
 (616)(16) (133) 
 (510) 
 (659)
Depreciation expense
 (23) 
 (71) 
 (94)
 (21) 
 (71) 
 (92)
Amortization of intangible assets
 
 
 (55) 
 (55)
 
 
 (54) 
 (54)
Net gain on disposal of operations
 
 
 12
 (10) 2
Restructuring expenses
 (14) 
 (22) 
 (36)
Total expenses(1) (361) (1) (2,597) (10) (2,970)(17) (249) 
 (2,889) 
 (3,155)
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME(1) (353) (1) 1,050
 (10) 685
(17) (241) 
 905
 
 647
Other (expense) income, net(15) (220) 
 11
 230
 6
Income from Group undertakings
 491
 68
 86
 (645) 

 450
 91
 102
 (643) 
Expenses due to Group undertakings(10) (153) (26) (456) 645
 

 (190) (29) (424) 643
 
Loss from extinguishment of debt
 (60) 
 
 
 (60)
Interest expense(42) (61) (18) (5) 
 (126)(43) (44) (36) (12) 
 (135)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(53) (136) 23
 675
 (10) 499
(75) (245) 26
 582
 230
 518
Income taxes
 29
 (6) (145) 
 (122)
 54
 (5) (208) 
 (159)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(53) (107) 17
 530
 (10) 377
(75) (191) 21
 374
 230
 359
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 9
 
 (9) 
 

 10
 
 4
 
 14
Equity account for subsidiaries418
 515
 344
 
 (1,277) 
437
 609
 314
 
 (1,360) 
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS365
 417
 361
 521
 (1,287) 377
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 
NET INCOME365
 417
 361
 521
 (1,287) 377
362
 428
 335
 378
 (1,130) 373
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (12) 
 (12)
 
 
 (11) 
 (11)
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$365
 $417
 $361
 $509
 $(1,287) $365
$362
 $428
 $335
 $367
 $(1,130) $362



183160

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
Comprehensive (loss) income$(11) $69
 $(5) $49
 $(108) $(6)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (5) 
 (5)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(11) $69
 $(5) $44
 $(108) $(11)


161

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

32.30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
 Year Ended December 31, 2013
 Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
REVENUES 
  
  
  
  
  
Commissions and fees$
 $8
 $
 $3,625
 $
 $3,633
Investment income
 
 
 15
 
 15
Other income
 
 
 7
 
 7
Total revenues
 8
 
 3,647
 
 3,655
EXPENSES 
  
  
  
  
  
Salaries and benefits(1) (103) 
 (2,103) 
 (2,207)
Other operating expenses(5) (231) (1) (399) 
 (636)
Depreciation expense
 (23) 
 (71) 
 (94)
Amortization of intangible assets
 
 
 (55) 
 (55)
Total expenses(6) (357) (1) (2,628) 
 (2,992)
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME(6) (349) (1) 1,019
 
 663
Other income (expense), net5
 (4) 
 31
 (10) 22
Income from Group undertakings
 491
 68
 86
 (645) 
Expenses due to Group undertakings(10) (153) (26) (456) 645
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt
 (60) 
 
 
 (60)
Interest expense(42) (61) (18) (5) 
 (126)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(53) (136) 23
 675
 (10) 499
Income taxes
 29
 (6) (145) 
 (122)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(53) (107) 17
 530
 (10) 377
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 9
 
 (9) 
 
Equity account for subsidiaries418
 515
 344
 
 (1,277) 
NET INCOME365
 417
 361
 521
 (1,287) 377
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (12) 
 (12)
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$365
 $417
 $361
 $509
 $(1,287) $365

162

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
Comprehensive income$522
 $565
 $504
 $636
 $(1,693) $534
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (12) 
 (12)
Comprehensive income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$522
 $565
 $504
 $624
 $(1,693) $522


184163

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statementsWillis Group Holdings plc

32.30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2012Year Ended December 31, 2012
Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 ConsolidatedWillis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
    (millions)        (millions)    
REVENUES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Commissions and fees$
 $
 $
 $3,458
 $
 $3,458
$
 $
 $
 $3,458
 $
 $3,458
Investment income
 1
 
 17
 
 18

 1
 
 17
 
 18
Other income
 
 
 4
 
 4

 
 
 4
 
 4
Total revenues
 1
 
 3,479
 
 3,480

 1
 
 3,479
 
 3,480
EXPENSES 
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
Salaries and benefits(2) (96) 
 (2,377) 
 (2,475)(2) (96) 
 (2,377) 
 (2,475)
Other operating expenses(4) (162) 1
 (416) 
 (581)(6) (158) 
 (436) 
 (600)
Depreciation expense
 (16) 
 (63) 
 (79)
 (16) 
 (63) 
 (79)
Amortization of intangible assets
 
 
 (59) 
 (59)
 
 
 (59) 
 (59)
Goodwill impairment
 
 
 (492) 
 (492)
 
 
 (492) 
 (492)
Net loss on disposal of operations
��
 
 (3) 
 (3)
Total expenses(6) (274) 1
 (3,410) 
 (3,689)(8) (270) 
 (3,427) 
 (3,705)
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME(6) (273) 1
 69
 
 (209)(8) (269) 
 52
 
 (225)
Other income (expense), net2
 (4) 1
 17
 
 16
Income from Group undertakings
 436
 79
 111
 (626) 

 436
 79
 111
 (626) 
Expenses due to Group undertakings
 (185) (27) (414) 626
 

 (185) (27) (414) 626
 
Interest expense(43) (69) (8) (8) 
 (128)(43) (69) (8) (8) 
 (128)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(49) (91) 45
 (242) 
 (337)(49) (91) 45
 (242) 
 (337)
Income taxes
 76
 (11) (166) 
 (101)
 76
 (11) (166) 
 (101)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(49) (15) 34
 (408) 
 (438)(49) (15) 34
 (408) 
 (438)
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 8
 
 (3) 
 5

 8
 
 (3) 
 5
Equity account for subsidiaries(397) (390) (461) 
 1,248
 
(397) (390) (461) 
 1,248
 
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS(446) (397) (427) (411) 1,248
 (433)
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 
NET LOSS(446) (397) (427) (411) 1,248
 (433)(446) (397) (427) (411) 1,248
 (433)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (13) 
 (13)
 
 
 (13) 
 (13)
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$(446) $(397) $(427) $(424) $1,248
 $(446)$(446) $(397) $(427) $(424) $1,248
 $(446)













185164

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plcNotes to the financial statements

32.30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
 Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
��    (millions)    
Comprehensive loss$(552) $(494) $(528) $(519) $1,554
 $(539)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (13) 
 (13)
Comprehensive loss attributable to Willis Group Holdings$(552) $(494) $(528) $(532) $1,554
 $(552)













186165

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statementsWillis Group Holdings plc

32.30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of OperationsBalance Sheet
 Year Ended December 31, 2011
 Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
REVENUES 
  
  
  
  
  
Commissions and fees$
 $
 $
 $3,414
 $
 $3,414
Investment income
 2
 
 29
 
 31
Other income
 
 
 2
 
 2
Total revenues
 2
 
 3,445
 
 3,447
EXPENSES 
  
  
  
  
  
Salaries and benefits(3) (69) 
 (2,015) 
 (2,087)
Other operating expenses(17) (70) 4
 (573) 
 (656)
Depreciation expense
 (14) 
 (60) 
 (74)
Amortization of intangible assets
 
 
 (68) 
 (68)
Net gain on disposal of operations
 
 
 4
 
 4
Total expenses(20) (153) 4
 (2,712) 
 (2,881)
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME(20) (151) 4
 733
 
 566
Income from Group undertakings
 438
 64
 119
 (621) 
Expenses due to Group undertakings
 (180) (26) (415) 621
 
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs
 
 (171) 
 
 (171)
Interest expense(34) (99) (15) (8) 
 (156)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(54) 8
 (144) 429
 
 239
Income taxes
 47
 39
 (117) (1) (32)
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INTEREST IN EARNINGS OF ASSOCIATES(54) 55
 (105) 312
 (1) 207
Interest in earnings of associates, net of tax
 8
 
 4
 
 12
Equity account for subsidiaries258
 183
 322
 
 (763) 
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS204
 246
 217
 316
 (764) 219
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 1
 
 1
NET INCOME204
 246
 217
 317
 (764) 220
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (16) 
 (16)
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS$204
 $246
 $217
 $301
 $(764) $204












 As at December 31, 2014
 Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
  
CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$9
 $2
 $
 $624
 $
 $635
Accounts receivable, net
 4
 
 1,040
 
 1,044
Fiduciary assets
 
 
 8,948
 
 8,948
Deferred tax assets
 
 
 12
 
 12
Other current assets1
 41
 1
 205
 (34) 214
Amounts due from group undertakings3,674
 1,154
 797
 1,114
 (6,739) 
Total current assets3,684
 1,201
 798
 11,943
 (6,773) 10,853
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries
 3,478
 2,578
 
 (6,056) 
Fixed assets, net
 62
 
 421
 
 483
Goodwill
 
 
 2,937
 
 2,937
Other intangible assets, net
 
 
 450
 
 450
Investments in associates
 147
 
 22
 
 169
Deferred tax assets
 
 
 9
 
 9
Pension benefits asset
 
 
 314
 
 314
Other non-current assets3
 2
 8
 207
 
 220
Non-current amounts due from group undertakings
 740
 518
 
 (1,258) 
Total non-current assets3
 4,429
 3,104
 4,360
 (7,314) 4,582
TOTAL ASSETS$3,687
 $5,630
 $3,902
 $16,303
 $(14,087) $15,435
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY           
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
Fiduciary liabilities$
 $
 $
 $8,948
 $
 $8,948
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses1
 34
 
 584
 
 619
Income taxes payable
 7
 5
 55
 (34) 33
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
 149
 17
 1
 
 167
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 
 21
 
 21
Other current liabilities67
 46
 11
 320
 
 444
Amounts due to group undertakings
 5,267
 576
 896
 (6,739) 
Total current liabilities68
 5,503
 609
 10,825
 (6,773) 10,232
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries838
 
 
 
 (838) 
Long-term debt796
 581
 765
 
 
 2,142
Liabilities for pension benefits
 
 
 284
 
 284
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 
 128
 
 128
Provisions for liabilities
 
 
 194
 
 194
Other non-current liabilities
 17
 
 372
 
 389
Non-current amounts due to group undertakings
 518
 
 740
 (1,258) 
Total non-current liabilities1,634
 1,116
 765
 1,718
 (2,096) 3,137
TOTAL LIABILITIES$1,702
 $6,619
 $1,374
 $12,543
 $(8,869) $13,369

187166

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plcNotes to the financial statements

32.30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive IncomeBalance Sheet
 Year Ended December 31, 2011
 
Willis
Group
Holdings
 
The Other
Guarantors
 
The
Issuer
 Other 
Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
Comprehensive income$1
 $48
 $20
 $114
 $(167) $16
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (15) 
 (15)
Comprehensive income attributable to Willis Group Holdings$1
 $48
 $20
 $99
 $(167) $1











 As at December 31, 2014
 Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
 
 
 59
 
 59
            
EQUITY 
  
  
  
  
  
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity1,985
 (989) 2,528
 3,679
 (5,218) 1,985
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 22
 
 22
Total equity1,985
 (989) 2,528
 3,701
 (5,218) 2,007
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$3,687
 $5,630
 $3,902
 $16,303
 $(14,087) $15,435


188167

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statementsWillis Group Holdings plc

32.30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 As at December 31, 2013
 Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$3
 $3
 $
 $790
 $
 $796
Accounts receivable, net
 4
 
 1,037
 
 1,041
Fiduciary assets
 
 
 8,412
 
 8,412
Deferred tax assets
 
 
 16
 (1) 15
Other current assets1
 36
 1
 186
 (27) 197
Amounts due from group undertakings4,051
 975
 793
 1,484
 (7,303) 
Total current assets4,055
 1,018
 794
 11,925
 (7,331) 10,461
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries
 3,716
 2,705
 
 (6,421) 
Fixed assets, net
 66
 
 415
 
 481
Goodwill
 
 
 2,838
 
 2,838
Other intangible assets, net
 
 
 353
 
 353
Investments in associates
 156
 
 20
 
 176
Deferred tax assets
 
 
 7
 
 7
Pension benefits asset
 
 
 278
 
 278
Other non-current assets4
 5
 9
 188
 
 206
Non-current amounts due from group undertakings
 1,113
 518
 
 (1,631) 
Total non-current assets4
 5,056
 3,232
 4,099
 (8,052) 4,339
TOTAL ASSETS$4,059
 $6,074
 $4,026
 $16,024
 $(15,383) $14,800
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY           
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
Fiduciary liabilities$
 $
 $
 $8,412
 $
 $8,412
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses2
 29
 
 555
 
 586
Income taxes payable
 4
 5
 39
 (27) 21
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
 
 15
 
 
 15
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 
 25
 
 25
Other current liabilities62
 42
 11
 300
 
 415
Amounts due to group undertakings
 5,813
 157
 1,333
 (7,303) 
Total current liabilities64
 5,888
 188
 10,664
 (7,330) 9,474
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries985
 
 
 
 (985) 
Long-term debt795
 733
 782
 1
 
 2,311
Liabilities for pension benefits
 
 
 136
 
 136
Deferred tax liabilities
 1
 
 55
 
 56
Provisions for liabilities
 
 
 206
 
 206
Other non-current liabilities
 48
 
 326
 
 374
Non-current amounts due to group undertakings
 518
 423
 690
 (1,631) 
Total non-current liabilities1,780
 1,300
 1,205
 1,414
 (2,616) 3,083
TOTAL LIABILITIES$1,844
 $7,188
 $1,393
 $12,078
 $(9,946) $12,557

189168

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plcNotes to the financial statements

32.30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 As at December 31, 2013
 Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
EQUITY 
  
  
  
  
  
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity2,215
 (1,114) 2,633
 3,918
 (5,437) 2,215
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 28
 
 28
Total equity2,215
 (1,114) 2,633
 3,946
 (5,437) 2,243
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$4,059
 $6,074
 $4,026
 $16,024
 $(15,383) $14,800


190

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

32. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 As at December 31, 2012
 Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$1
 $
 $
 $499
 $
 $500
Accounts receivable, net
 
 
 933
 
 933
Fiduciary assets
 
 
 9,271
 
 9,271
Deferred tax assets
 
 
 13
 
 13
Other current assets1
 79
 1
 114
 (14) 181
Amounts due from group undertakings4,091
 1,070
 801
 864
 (6,826) 
Total current assets4,093
 1,149
 802
 11,694
 (6,840) 10,898
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
  
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries
 2,939
 2,464
 
 (5,403) 
Fixed assets, net
 74
 
 394
 
 468
Goodwill
 
 
 2,827
 
 2,827
Other intangible assets, net
 
 
 385
 
 385
Investments in associates
 143
 
 31
 
 174
Deferred tax assets
 
 
 18
 
 18
Pension benefits asset
 
 
 136
 
 136
Other non-current assets5
 41
 3
 157
 
 206
Non-current amounts due from group undertakings
 1,064
 
 
 (1,064) 
Total non-current assets5
 4,261
 2,467
 3,948
 (6,467) 4,214
TOTAL ASSETS$4,098
 $5,410
 $3,269
 $15,642
 $(13,307) $15,112
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY           
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
Fiduciary liabilities$
 $
 $
 $9,271
 $
 $9,271
Deferred revenue and accrued expenses2
 
 
 539
 
 541
Income taxes payable
 4
 11
 18
 (14) 19
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
 
 15
 
 
 15
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 
 21
 
 21
Other current liabilities60
 73
 
 194
 
 327
Amounts due to group undertakings
 5,714
 69
 1,043
 (6,826) 
Total current liabilities62
 5,791
 95
 11,086
 (6,840) 10,194
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
Investments in subsidiaries1,542
 
 
 
 (1,542) 
Long-term debt795
 1,268
 274
 1
 
 2,338
Liabilities for pension benefits
 
 
 282
 
 282
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 
 18
 
 18
Provisions for liabilities
 
 
 180
 
 180
Other non-current liabilities
 12
 
 363
 
 375
Non-current amounts due to group undertakings
 
 423
 641
 (1,064) 
Total non-current liabilities2,337
 1,280
 697
 1,485
 (2,606) 3,193
TOTAL LIABILITIES$2,399
 $7,071
 $792
 $12,571
 $(9,446) $13,387

191169

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

32. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 As at December 31, 2012
 Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
     (millions)    
EQUITY 
  
  
  
  
  
Total Willis Group Holdings stockholders’ equity1,699
 (1,661) 2,477
 3,045
 (3,861) 1,699
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 26
 
 26
Total equity1,699
 (1,661) 2,477
 3,071
 (3,861) 1,725
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$4,098
 $5,410
 $3,269
 $15,642
 $(13,307) $15,112


192

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

32.30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2013Year Ended December 31, 2014
Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 ConsolidatedWillis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
    (millions)        (millions)    
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES$4
 $399
 $63
 $662
 $(567) $561
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES$(35) $781
 $181
 $212
 $(662) $477
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets
 3
 
 9
 
 12

 1
 
 6
 (1) 6
Additions to fixed assets
 (18) 
 (94) 
 (112)
 (19) 
 (95) 1
 (113)
Additions to intangible assets
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
 
 
 (4) 
 (4)
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
 (237) 
 (30) 237
 (30)
 
 
 (241) 
 (241)
Payments to acquire other investments
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
 
 
 (10) 
 (10)
Proceeds from sale of associates
 
 
 4
 
 4
Proceeds from sale of operations, net of cash disposed
 
 
 257
 (237) 20

 
 
 86
 
 86
Proceeds from intercompany investing activities383
 160
 132
 60
 (735) 
361
 120
 
 435
 (916) 
Repayments of intercompany investing activities(347) (120) (442) (780) 1,689
 

 (180) (4) (46) 230
 
Additional investment in subsidiaries(31) 
 
 
 31
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities36
 (212) (310) (588) 954
 (120)330
 (78) (4) 131
 (655) (276)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Senior notes issued
 
 522
 
 
 522
Debt issuance costs
 
 (8) 
 
 (8)
 
 
 (3) 
 (3)
Repayments of debt
 (521) (15) 
 
 (536)
 
 (15) 
 
 (15)
Tender premium on extinguishment of senior notes
 (65) 
 
 
 (65)
Repurchase of shares(213) 
 
 
 
 (213)
Proceeds from issue of shares155
 
 
 
 
 155
134
 
 
 31
 (31) 134
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangement
 
 
 2
 
 2

 
 
 5
 
 5
Dividends paid(193) (230) (330) (7) 567
 (193)(210) (155) (155) (352) 662
 (210)
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (4) 
 (4)
 (4) 
 
 
 (4)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (10) 
 (10)
 
 
 (17) 
 (17)
Proceeds from intercompany financing activities
 1,075
 147
 467
 (1,689) 

 50
 
 180
 (230) 
Repayments of intercompany financing activities
 (443) (69) (223) 735
 

 (595) (7) (314) 916
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(38) (184) 247
 225
 (387) (137)
Net cash used in financing activities(289) (704) (177) (470) 1,317
 (323)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS2
 3
 
 299
 
 304
6
 (1) 
 (127) 
 (122)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
 
 (8) 
 (8)
 
 
 (39) 
 (39)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR1
 
 
 499
 
 500
3
 3
 
 790
 
 796
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR$3
 $3
 $
 $790
 $
 $796
$9
 $2
 $
 $624
 $
 $635


193170

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plcNotes to the financial statements

32.30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2012Year Ended December 31, 2013
Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 ConsolidatedWillis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
    (millions)        (millions)    
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES$(23) $2,393
 $1,356
 $(97) $(3,104) $525
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES$4
 $399
 $63
 $662
 $(567) $561
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets
 
 
 5
 
 5

 3
 
 9
 
 12
Additions to fixed assets
 (26) 
 (109) 
 (135)
 (18) 
 (94) 
 (112)
Additions to intangible assets
 
 
 (2) 
 (2)
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
 
 
 (33) 
 (33)
 (237) 
 (30) 237
 (30)
Payments to acquire other investments
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Proceeds from sale of associates
 
 
 4
 
 4
Proceeds from sale of operations, net of cash disposed
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 257
 (237) 20
Proceeds from intercompany investing activities256
 176
 78
 1,230
 (1,740) 
383
 160
 132
 60
 (735) 
Repayments of intercompany investing activities
 (197) (131) (81) 409
 
(347) (120) (442) (780) 1,689
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities256
 (47) (53) 1,003
 (1,331) (172)36
 (212) (310) (588) 954
 (120)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Senior notes issued
 
 522
 
 
 522
Debt issuance costs
 
 (8) 
 
 (8)
Repayments of debt
 (4) (11) 
 
 (15)
 (521) (15) 
 
 (536)
Proceeds from issue of other debt
 
 1
 
 
 1
Repurchase of shares(100) 
 
 
 
 (100)
Tender premium on extinguishment of senior notes
 (65) 
 
 
 (65)
Proceeds from issue of shares53
 
 
 
 
 53
155
 
 
 
 
 155
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangement
 
 
 2
 
 2

 
 
 2
 
 2
Dividends paid(185) (1,220) (1,069) (815) 3,104
 (185)(193) (230) (330) (7) 567
 (193)
Proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interests
 
 
 3
 
 3
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (39) 
 (39)
 
 
 (4) 
 (4)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (11) 
 (11)
 
 
 (10) 
 (10)
Proceeds from intercompany financing activities
 81
 
 328
 (409) 

 1,075
 147
 467
 (1,689) 
Repayments of intercompany financing activities
 (1,366) (224) (150) 1,740
 

 (443) (69) (223) 735
 
Net cash used in financing activities(232) (2,509) (1,303) (682) 4,435
 (291)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS1
 (163) 
 224
 
 62
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(38) (184) 247
 225
 (387) (137)
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS2
 3
 
 299
 
 304
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
 
 2
 
 2

 
 
 (8) 
 (8)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR
 163
 
 273
 
 436
1
 
 
 499
 
 500
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR$1
 $
 $
 $499
 $
 $500
$3
 $3
 $
 $790
 $
 $796


194171

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statementsWillis Group Holdings plc

32.30. FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR ISSUER, PARENT GUARANTOR, OTHER GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2011Year Ended December 31, 2012
Willis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 ConsolidatedWillis
Group
Holdings
 The Other
Guarantors
 The
Issuer
 Other Consolidating
adjustments
 Consolidated
    (millions)        (millions)    
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES$44
 $(359) $856
 $131
 $(233) $439
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES$(23) $2,393
 $1,356
 $(97) $(3,104) $525
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Proceeds on disposal of fixed and intangible assets
 
 
 13
 
 13

 
 
 5
 
 5
Additions to fixed assets
 (25) 
 (86) 
 (111)
 (26) 
 (109) 
 (135)
Additions to intangible assets
 
 
 (2) 
 (2)
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
 
 
 (10) 
 (10)
 
 
 (33) 
 (33)
Acquisitions of investments in associates
 
 
 (2) 
 (2)
Payments to acquire other investments
 
 
 (5) 
 (5)
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Proceeds from sale of operations, net of cash disposed
 
 
 14
 
 14
Proceeds from intercompany investing activities
 105
 
 224
 (329) 
256
 176
 78
 1,230
 (1,740) 
Repayments of intercompany investing activities(711) (138) (292) (101) 1,242
 

 (197) (131) (81) 409
 
Net cash (used in) investing activities(711) (58) (292) 47
 913
 (101)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities256
 (47) (53) 1,003
 (1,331) (172)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
Repayments of revolving credit facility
 (90) 
 
 
 (90)
Senior notes issued794
 
 
 
 
 794
Debt issuance costs(7) 
 (5) 
 
 (12)
Repayments of debt
 (411) (500) 
 
 (911)
 (4) (11) 
 
 (15)
Proceeds from issue of term loan
 
 300
 
 
 300
Make-whole on repurchase and redemption of senior notes
 
 (158) 
 
 (158)
Proceeds from issue of other debt
 
 1
 
 
 1
Repurchase of shares(100) 
 
 
 
 (100)
Proceeds from issue of shares60
 
 
 
 
 60
53
 
 
 
 
 53
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
 
 
 5
 
 5

 
 
 2
 
 2
Dividends paid(180) (47) 
 (186) 233
 (180)(185) (1,220) (1,069) (815) 3,104
 (185)
Proceeds from sale of noncontrolling interests
 
 
 3
 
 3
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests
 (4) 
 (5) 
 (9)
 
 
 (39) 
 (39)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (13) 
 (13)
 
 
 (11) 
 (11)
Proceeds from intercompany financing activities
 1,088
 
 154
 (1,242) 

 81
 
 328
 (409) 
Repayments of intercompany financing activities
 (32) (201) (96) 329
 

 (1,366) (224) (150) 1,740
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities667
 504
 (564) (141) (680) (214)
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
 87
 
 37
 
 124
Net cash used in financing activities(232) (2,509) (1,303) (682) 4,435
 (291)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS1
 (163) 
 224
 
 62
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
 
 (4) 
 (4)
 
 
 2
 
 2
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR
 76
 
 240
 
 316

 163
 
 273
 
 436
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR$
 $163
 $
 $273
 $
 $436
$1
 $
 $
 $499
 $
 $500


195172

Table of Contents

Notes to the financial statements

31.QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Quarterly financial data for 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
 Three Months Ended
 March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
 (millions, except per share data)
2014 
  
  
  
Total revenues$1,097
 $935
 $812
 $958
Total expenses(771) (787) (778) (819)
Net income (loss)250
 48
 (8) 83
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings246
 47
 (7) 76
Earnings per share 
  
  
  
— Basic$1.37
 $0.26
 $(0.04) $0.43
— Diluted$1.35
 $0.26
 $(0.04) $0.42
2013 
  
  
  
Total revenues$1,051
 $890
 $795
 $919
Total expenses(770) (723) (725) (774)
Net income (loss)223
 107
 (27) 74
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings219
 105
 (27) 68
Earnings per share 
  
  
  
— Basic$1.27
 $0.60
 $(0.15) $0.38
— Diluted$1.24
 $0.59
 $(0.15) $0.37

32.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In January, 2015 the Company reached an agreement to acquire a majority interest in Miller Insurance Services LLP, a leading London-based wholesale specialist. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approval and is expected to close in the second quarter of 2015.


173

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


33.QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Quarterly financial data for 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
 Three Months Ended
 March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
 (millions, except per share data)
2013 
  
  
  
Total revenues$1,051
 $890
 $795
 $919
Total expenses(764) (719) (720) (767)
Net income (loss)223
 107
 (27) 74
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings219
 105
 (27) 68
Earnings per share — continuing operations 
  
  
  
— Basic$1.27
 $0.60
 $(0.15) $0.38
— Diluted$1.24
 $0.59
 $(0.15) $0.37
2012 
  
  
  
Total revenues$1,013
 $842
 $754
 $871
Total expenses(696) (663) (684) (1,646)
Net income (loss)232
 110
 26
 (801)
Net income (loss) attributable to Willis Group Holdings225
 108
 26
 (805)
Earnings per share — continuing operations 
  
  
  
— Basic$1.29
 $0.62
 $0.15
 $(4.65)
— Diluted$1.28
 $0.61
 $0.15
 $(4.65)


196

Table of Contents

Controls and procedures

Item 9 — Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A — Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 20132014, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Group Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Group Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of that date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) are effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officerChief Executive Officer and principal financial officer,Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132014, based on the criteria related to internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 20132014.
Our independent registered public accountants, Deloitte LLP, who have audited and reported on our financial statements, have undertaken an assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Deloitte’s report is presented below.
February 27, 2014.24, 2015

197174

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc

Controls and procedures

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company,
Dublin, Ireland
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company and subsidiaries (the 'Company') as of December 31, 20132014, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 20132014 of the Company and our report dated February 27, 201424, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

/s/ Deloitte LLP
London, United Kingdom
February 27, 201424, 2015

198175

Table of Contents

Controls and proceduresWillis Group Holdings plc


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 20132014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B — Other Information
None.


199

Table of Contents

Willis Group Holdings plc


PART III
Item 10—10 — Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Except forInformation with respect to the information regarding executive officers required byof the Company is provided in Part I, Item 4011 above under the heading “Executive Officers of Regulation S-K which is set forth below as of February 14, 2014, the Registrant”. All other information required by this item with respect to our directors and executive officers, code of ethics, procedures for recommending nominees, audit committee, audit committee financial experts and compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange ActItem will be provided in accordance with Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K no later than April 30, 2014.2015.
Item 11 — Executive Compensation
Celia Brown - Ms. Brown, age 59, was appointed an executive officer on January 23, 2012. Ms. Brown joined the Willis GroupThe information required by this Item will be provided in 2010accordance with Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K no later than April 30, 2015.

Item 12 — Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and serves as the Willis Group Human Resources Director. Prior to joining the Willis Group, Ms. Brown spent over 20 years at XL Group plc where she held a number of senior roles. Ms. Brown served from 2006 to 2009 as the Executive Vice President, Head of Global HRManagement and Corporate Relations at XL Group plc. Following XL Group plc, Ms. Brown formed an independent management consultancy, providing human resources services to not-for-profit, corporate and individual clients.Related Stockholder Matters
Dominic Casserley - Mr. Casserley, age 56, was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of Willis Group Holdings plc and as a member of the Board on January 7, 2013. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Casserley, was a senior partner of McKinsey & Company, which he joined in New York in 1983. During his 29 years at McKinsey, Mr. Casserley led the firm's Greater China Practice and its UK and Ireland Practice. Mr. Casserley had been a member of the McKinsey Shareholders Council, the firm's global board, since 1999 and for four years served as the Chairman of the Finance Committee of that board. Mr. Casserley is a graduate of Cambridge University.
Stephen Hearn - Mr. Hearn, age 47, was appointed an executive officer on January 1, 2012. Mr. Hearn joined the Willis Group in 2008 and was named Chairman and CEO of Willis Global in 2011, CEO of Willis Limited in 2012 and Group Deputy CEO in 2013. Since joining the Willis Group, Mr. Hearn has served as Chairman of Special Contingency Risk, Chairman of Willis Facultative and Chairman and CEO of Glencairn Limited. From 2009 until 2011 he led Faber & Dumas, Global Markets International and Willis Facultative. Prior to joining the Willis Group, Mr. Hearn served as Chairman and CEO of the Glencairn Group Limited and as President and CEO of Marsh Affinity Europe.
Todd Jones - Mr. Jones, age 49, was appointed an executive officer and CEO of Willis North America on July 1, 2013. Mr. Jones joined Willis in 2003 as the North American Practice Leader for Willis’s Executive Risks Practice and served as the President of Willis North America from 2010 to 2013. Mr. Jones also served as a National PartnerExcept for the Northeast Region. Priorinformation below regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K, the information required by this Item will be provided in accordance with Instruction G(3) to joining Willis, Mr. Jones held various leadership roles inForm 10-K no later than April 30, 2015.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2014, about the insurance brokerage industry. Before entering the brokerage industry, he was a financial analyst and corporate bankersecurities authorized for a regional bank that is now part of Wells Fargo, focusing on the telecommunications industry.
Michael K. Neborak - Mr. Neborak, age 57, was appointed an executive officer and Group Chief Financial Officer on July 6, 2010. Mr. Neborak joined Willis from MSCI Inc., a NYSE listed company, where he was Chief Financial Officer. With more than 30 years of experience in finance and accounting, Mr. Neborak also held senior positions with Citigroup, including divisional CFO and co-head of Corporate Strategy & Business Development, from 2000 to 2006, and prior to that, in the investment banking group at Salomon Smith Barney from 1982 to 2000. He began his career as an accountant with Arthur Andersen & Co.
Adam L. Rosman -Mr. Rosman, age 48, was appointed Group General Counsel on May 7, 2012issuance under our equity compensation plans, and is responsible for legal, corporate secretary, compliance, audit and risk management. He joined Willis in 2009 and served for three years ascategorized according to whether or not the company's Deputy Group General Counsel, responsible for Willis' worldwide legal operations. Before joining Willis, Adamequity plan was Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel at Cablevision Systems Corporation in Bethpage, NY, and before that he was a partner at the Washington D.C.-based law firm of Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, where he advised public companies and senior executives on a range of topics, including Sarbanes-Oxley. Between 1997 and 2003, Adam was an Assistant United States Attorney in Washington, D.C., where he prosecuted a wide range of matters. He also worked in 2000 and 2001 as Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy Staff Secretary for President Clinton.previously approved by shareholders:
David Shalders - Mr. Shalders, age 47, was appointed an executive officer and Group Operations & Technology Director on November 4, 2013. Prior to joining Willis, Mr. Shalders spent over a decade in senior operations and IT roles at the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, most recently as Global COO for Global Banking and Markets. Mr. Shalders also held roles as Head of London & Asia Operations and Head of Derivative Operations for NatWest at RBS.
Plan Category Number of Shares to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights 
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(i)
 Number of Shares Remaining Available for Future Issuance 
        
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders 12,499,128
(ii) 
$35.99
 6,397,310
(iii) 
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders 240,040
(iv) 
$23.59
 126,231
(v) 
Total 12,739,168
 $35.96
 6,523,541
 


(i)The weighted-average exercise price set forth in this column is calculated excluding RSUs or other awards for which recipients are not required to pay an exercise price to receive the shares subject to the awards.

(ii)Includes options and RSUs outstanding under the 2001 Share Purchase and Option Plan, 2008 Plan and 2012 Plan.

(iii)Represents shares available for issuance pursuant to awards that may be granted under the 2012 Plan (6,037,908 shares) and the 2010 North American Employee Stock Purchase Plan (359,402 shares).


200176

Table Of Contents

Directors and Officers

(iv)Includes options and RSUs outstanding under the following plans that were assumed by Willis in connection with the acquisition by Willis of Hilb, Rogal & Hobbs: the 2000 HRH Plan and the 2007 HRH Plan. No future awards will be granted under the 2000 HRH Plan. The above amounts do not include an aggregate of 45,000 options held by certain non-employee directors pursuant to which they receive the intrinsic value in cash rather than shares upon exercise of the options. These options were subsequently exercised.
Timothy D. Wright - Mr. Wright, age 52, was appointed an executive officer in 2008 and in 2012 was appointed CEO
(v)Represents shares that remain available for issuance under the 2007 HRH Plan. Willis is authorized to grant awards under the 2007 HRH Plan until 2017 to employees who were formerly employed by Hilb, Rogal & Hobbs and to new employees who have joined Willis or one of its subsidiaries since October 1, 2008, the date that the acquisition of Hilb, Rogal & Hobbs was completed.


177

Table of Willis International. Mr. Wright served as Group Chief Operating Officer from 2008 to 2012. Prior to joining the Contents

Willis Group he was a Partner of Bain & Company where he led their Financial Services practice in London. Mr. Wright was previously UK Managing Partner of Booz Allen & Hamilton and led their insurance work globally. He has more than 20 years of experience in the insurance and financial service industries internationally.
Item 11 — Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item with respect to executive officer and director compensation will be provided in accordance with Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K no later than April 30, 2014.Holdings plc

Item 12 — Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management equity and securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be provided in accordance with Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K no later than April 30, 2014.

Item 13 — Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item with respect to transactions with related persons, the review, approval or ratification of such transactions and director independence will be provided in accordance with Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K no later than April 30, 2014.2015.

Item 14 — Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this Item with respect to auditors' services and fees will be provided in accordance with Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K no later than April 30, 2014.2015.



201


Willis Group Holdings plc


PART IV
Item 15 — Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company consisting of:
(a) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
(b) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
(c) Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132014.
(d) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132014.
(e) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013.
(f) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132014.
(g) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132014.
(h) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.
(2) Exhibits:
1.1Underwriting Agreement, dated August 8, 2013, by and among Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, as issuer, the guarantors named therein and Barclays Capital Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, as representatives of the several underwriters named therein (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit No. 1.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
2.1Scheme of Arrangement by and between Willis Group Holdings Limited and the Scheme Shareholders (incorporated by reference to Annex A to Willis Group Holdings Limited's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on November 2, 2009 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
3.1Memorandum and Articles of Association of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
3.2Certificate of Incorporation of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
4.1Senior Indenture, dated as of July 1, 2005, and First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 1, 2005, by and among Willis North America Inc., as the Issuer, Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, TA I Limited, TA II Limited, TA III Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, TA IV Limited and Willis Group Limited, as the Guarantors, and The Bank of New York (f/k/a JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), as the Trustee, for the issuance of the 5.625% senior notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Willis Group Holdings Limited's Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2005 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  

178


Exhibits

4.2Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 28, 2007, by and among Willis North America Inc., as the Issuer, Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, TA I Limited, TA II Limited, TA III Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, TA IV Limited and Willis Group Limited, as the Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as the Trustee, to the Indenture dated as of July 1, 2005, for the issuance of the 6.200% senior notes due 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Willis Group Holdings Limited's Form 8-K filed on March 30, 2007 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
4.3Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2008, by and among Willis North America Inc., as the Issuer, Willis Group Holdings Limited, Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, TA II Limited, TA III Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, TA IV Limited and Willis Group Limited, as the Guarantors, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as the Trustee, to the Indenture dated as of July 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Willis Group Holdings Limited's Form 10-Q filed on November 10, 2008 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  

202


Exhibits

4.4Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 29, 2009, by and among Willis North America Inc., as the Issuer, Willis Group Holdings Limited, Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, TA II Limited, TA III Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, TA IV Limited and Willis Group Public Limited Company, as the Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as the Trustee, to the Indenture dated as of July 1, 2005, for the issuance of the 7.000% senior notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Willis Group Holdings Limited's Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
4.5Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 31, 2009, by and among Willis North America Inc., as the Issuer, Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, Willis Group Holdings Limited, Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, TA II Limited, TA III Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, TA IV Limited and Willis Group Limited, as the Guarantors, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as the Trustee, to the Indenture dated as of July 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
4.6Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 22, 2010, by and among Willis North America Inc., as the Issuer, Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis Investment UK Holdings Limited, TA I Limited, TA II Limited, TA III Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, TA IV Limited and Willis Group Limited, as the Guarantors, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as the Trustee, to the Indenture dated as of July 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
4.7Indenture, dated as of March 17, 2011, by and among Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, as issuer, Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis Investment Holdings UK Limited, TA I Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, Willis Group Limited and Willis North America Inc., as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on March 17, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
4.8First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 17, 2011, by and among Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, as Issuer, Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis Investment Holdings UK Limited, TA I Limited, Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, Willis Group Limited and Willis North America Inc., as guarantors, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Indenture dated March 17, 2011, for the issuance of the 4.125% senior notes due 2016 and the 5.750% senior notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on March 17, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
4.9Indenture, dated as of August 15, 2013, by and among Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, as issuer, Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis North America Inc., Willis Investment Holdings UK Limited, TA I Limited and Willis Group Limited, as guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 15, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
4.10First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 15, 2013, by and among Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, as issuer, Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, Willis Netherlands Holdings B.V., Willis North America Inc., Willis Investment Holdings UK Limited, TA I Limited and Willis Group Limited, as guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, to the Indenture dated August 15, 2013, for the issuance of 4.625% senior notes due 2023 and 6.125% senior notes due 2043 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 15, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503)).
  
10.1Credit Agreement, dated as of December 16, 2011, by and among Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, the Lenders party thereto, Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and as an L/C Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  

179


Willis Group Holdings plc


10.2First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2013, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2011, by and among Trinity Acquisition PLC,Limited, Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, the lenders party thereto and Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on July 25, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
10.3Guaranty Agreement, dated as of December 16, 2011, by and among Trinity Acquisition plc,Limited, Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
10.4Revolving Note and Cash Subordination Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2014, by and among Willis Securities, Inc., as borrower, SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
10.5Joinder Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2014, by and among Willis Securities, Inc., SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
10.6First Amendment to Revolving Note and Cash Subordination Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2014, by and among Willis Securities, Inc., SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
10.7Deed Poll of Assumption, dated as of December 31, 2009, by and between Willis Group Holdings Limited and Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.510.8Willis Group Senior Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  

203


Willis Group Holdings plc


10.610.9Willis Group Holdings 2010 North America Employee Share Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.710.10Willis Group Holdings 2001 Share Purchase and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.810.11Form of Performance-Based Option Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings 2001 Share Purchase and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.910.12Form of Time-Based Option Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings 2001 Share Purchase and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 the Company's Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.1010.13Form of Time-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings 2001 Share Purchase and Option Plan (for executive officers) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.1110.14Form of Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement for Non-employeeNon-Employee Directors under the Willis Group Holdings 2001 Share Purchase Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company's Form 10-K filed February 29, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.1210.15Form of Performance-Based Option Agreement -for the 2011 Long Term Incentive Program under the Willis Group Holdings 2001 Share Purchase and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.1310.16Form of 2011 Long Term Incentive Program Agreement of Restrictive Covenants and Other Obligations (for US employees) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.1410.17Form of 2011 Long Term Incentive Program Agreement of Restrictive Covenants and Other Obligations (for UK employees) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.1510.18Form of 2011 Long Term Incentive Program Cash Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.1610.19Rules of the Willis Group Holdings Sharesave Plan 2001 for the United Kingdom (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  

180


Exhibits

10.17
10.20The Willis Group Holdings Irish Sharesave Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on May 5, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.1810.21Willis Group Holdings 2008 Share Purchase and Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.1910.22Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Units Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings 2008 Share Purchase and Option Plan (for executive officers) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.2010.23Form of Performance-Based Option Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings 2008 Share Purchase and Option Plan (for executive officers) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.21Hilb Rogal and Hamilton Company 2000 Share Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.2210.24Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company 2007 Share Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.2310.25Form of Time-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement granted under the Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company 2007 Share Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 6, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.2410.26Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement granted under the Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company 2007 Share Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.2510.27Form of Time-Based Option Agreement granted under the Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company 2007 Share Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 6, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†

204


Exhibits

  
10.2610.28Form of Performance-Based Option Agreement granted under the Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company 2007 Share Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.2710.29Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's 8-K filed on April 30, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.2810.30Form of Time BasedTime-Based Share Option Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.2910.31Form of Performance BasedPerformance-Based Share Option Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.3010.32Form of Time BasedTime-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.3110.33Form of Performance BasedPerformance-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.3210.34Form of Time BasedTime-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (for Non-Employee Directors) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.3310.35Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan for the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Program*Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on February 27, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
10.3410.36Rules of the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Sharesave Sub-Plan for the United Kingdom to the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.3510.37Form of 2012 Long Term Incentive Program Agreement of Restrictive Covenants and Other Obligations (for US employees) Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  

181


Willis Group Holdings plc


10.36
10.38Form of 2012 Long Term Incentive Program Agreement of Restrictive Covenants and Other Obligations (for UK employees) Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.3710.39Amended and Restated Willis US 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on November 20, 2009 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.3810.40First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Willis U.S. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, effective June 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.3910.41Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Willis US 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 6 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 5, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.4010.42Instrument Comprising A Guarantee In FavourFavor of Willis Pension Trustees Limited in Respect of the Willis Pension Scheme (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on April 5 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.4110.43Schedule of Contributions for the Willis Pension Scheme (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.4210.44Form of Deed of Indemnity of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company with directors and officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.4310.45Form of Indemnification Agreement of Willis North America Inc. with directors and officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  

205


Willis Group Holdings plc


10.4410.46Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 1 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 5, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
10.452010 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2010, by and between Willis North America, Inc. and Joseph J. Plumeri (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on January 22, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
10.46First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2012, by and between Willis North America Inc., a subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, and Joseph J. Plumeri (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.47Employment Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2012, by and between Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company and Dominic Casserley (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.48Letter agreement, dated January 31, 2014, by and between Willis Group Holdings plc and Dominic Casserley.*Casserley (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on February 27, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
10.49Form of Time-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, dated May 10, 2013, by and between Dominic Casserley and Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 5, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.50Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, dated May 10, 2013, by and between Dominic Casserley and Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 5, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.51Form of Time-Based Share Option Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, dated May 10, 2013, by and between Dominic Casserley and Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on November 5, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.52Form of Time-Based Share Option Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, dated as of March 31, 2014, by and between Dominic Casserley and Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company†* 
10.53Form of Time-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, dated as of March 31, 2014, by and between Dominic Casserley and Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company†* 
10.54Offer Letter, dated June 22, 2010, and Form of Employment Agreement between Willis North America, Inc. and Michael K. Neborak (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  

182


Exhibits

10.53
10.55Agreement of Restrictive Covenants and Other Obligations, dated as of August 2, 2010, between the Company and Michael K. Neborak (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company's Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.54Second Restated Employment Agreement, effective as of December 3, 2010, between Willis North America Inc. and Victor Krauze (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on February 29, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
10.55First Amendment to Offer of Promotion dated as of October 16, 2012, by and between Willis North America Inc., a subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, and Victor P. Krauze. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
10.56Agreement by and between Victor P. Krauze and Willis North America, Inc., a subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, dated July 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
10.57Contract of Employment, dated as of February 28, 2011, by and between Willis Limited, a subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, and Stephen P. Hearn (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.5810.57Amendment, dated July 19, 2012, to the Contract of Employment, dated as of February 28, 2011 by and between Willis Limited, a subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, and Stephen P. Hearn (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.5910.58Contract of Employment, dated as of October 16, 2012, by and between Willis Limited, a subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, and Stephen P. Hearn (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  

206


Exhibits

10.59Amendment, dated April 30, 2014, to the Contract of Employment, dated as of October 16, 2012, by and between Willis Limited, a subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, and Stephen Hearn (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 9, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
10.60Contract of Employment, dated as of December 17, 2007, by and between Willis Limited, a subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, and Tim Wright (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.55 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.61Amendment, dated July 19, 2012, to the Contract of Employment, dated as of December 17, 2007, by and between Willis Limited, a subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, and Tim Wright (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.62Confidentiality Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2008, by and between the Willis Group Limited, a subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, and Tim Wright (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.57 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
  
10.63Amendment, dated April 30, 2014, to the Employment Agreement dated December 17, 2007 by and between Willis Limited, a subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, and Tim Wright (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 9, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
10.64
Employment Agreement, dated September 15, 2003 by and between Willis Americas Administration, Inc. and Todd J. Jones*Jones (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.63 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on February 27, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-16503))

  
10.6410.65Letter Agreement, dated August 1, 2013, by and between Willis North America Inc., a subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, and Todd J. Jones*Jones (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.64 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on February 27, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
10.6510.66Amendment, dated April 30, 2014, to the Employment Agreement, dated August 1, 2013, by and between Willis North America, Inc., a subsidiary of Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, and Todd J. Jones (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 9, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-16503))†
10.67Separation Letter Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2014, by and between Michael Neborak and Willis North America, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-16503)) † 
10.68Employment Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2014, by and between Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company and John Greene (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed on March 23, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-16503)) † 
10.69Form of Time-Based Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement under the Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, dated as of August 11, 2014, by and between John Greene and Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company†* 

183


Willis Group Holdings plc


10.70Nominating Agreement, dated April 25, 2013, by and among Willis Group Holdings Public Limited Company, ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P., VA Partners I, LLC, ValueAct Capital Management, L.P., ValueAct Capital Management, LLC, ValueAct Holdings, L.P., ValueAct Holdings GP, LLC and their respective affiliates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2013 ((SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
10.6610.71Investment and Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2009, by and among Willis Europe BV, Astorg Partners, Soleil, Alcee, the Lucas family shareholders, the Gras family shareholders, key managers of Gras Savoye & Cie and other minority shareholders of Gras Savoye (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
10.6710.72Shareholders Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2009, by and among Willis Europe BV, Astorg Partners, Soleil, Alcee, the Lucas family shareholders, the Gras family shareholders, key managers of Gras Savoye & Cie and other minority shareholders of Gras Savoye (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Company's Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
10.6810.73Amended and Restated Shareholders' Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2013, by and among Willis Europe BV, Willis Netherlands Holdings BV, Astorg Partners, GS & Cie Group, Alcee, the Lucas family shareholders, the Gras family shareholders, key managers of Gras Savoye & Cie and other minority shareholders of Gras Savoye (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.60 to the Company's Form 10-Q filed on May 8, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-16503))
  
12.1Statement regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.*
Charges*
21.1List of subsidiaries*
23.1Consent of Deloitte LLP*
31.1Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)*
31.2Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)*
32.1Certification Pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350*
32.2Certification Pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350*
101.INSXBRL Instance Document
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Filed herewith.
  
† Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
  


207184


Willis Group Holdings plc


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 
WILLIS GROUP HOLDINGS PLC
(REGISTRANT)
   
 By: /s/ MICHAEL K. NEBORAKJOHN GREENE
  Michael K. NeborakJohn Greene
  Group Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: February 27, 201424, 2015
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated this 27th24th day of February 2014.2015.

/s/ DOMINIC CASSERLEY /s/ ANNA C. CATALANO
Dominic Casserley
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
 

Anna C. Catalano
Director
   
/s/ SIR ROY GARDNER /s/ THE RT. HON. SIR JEREMY HANLEY, KCMG
Sir Roy Gardner
Director
 
The Rt. Hon. Sir Jeremy Hanley, KCMG
Director
   
/s/ ROBYN S. KRAVIT /s/ WENDY E. LANE
Robyn S. Kravit
Director
 
Wendy E. Lane
Director
   
/s/ FRANCISCO LUZÓN
LUZON
 /s/ JAMES F. McCANN
Francisco Luzón
Director
 
James F. McCann
Director
   
/s/ JAYMIN B. PATEL /s/ DOUGLAS B. ROBERTS
Jaymin B. Patel
Director
 
Douglas B. Roberts
Director
   
/s/ MICHAEL J. SOMERS /s/ JEFFREY W. UBBEN
Michael J. Somers
Director
 
Jeffrey W. Ubben
Director


208185