UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.DC 20549


FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

OR

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007¨
or
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission file number 001-335411111 West Jefferson Street, Suite 200


Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.Boise, Idaho 83702-5388

(Exact nameAddress of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
20-8356960
(State or other jurisdiction of(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)Identification No.)
c/o Terrapin Partners LLC, 540 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor,
New York, New York
10022
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)

principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(212) 710-4100f(208) 384-7000

(Registrant’sRegistrants’ telephone number, including area code)

Commission
File Number
Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter
I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.

State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization
001-33541Boise Inc.20-8356960Delaware
333-166926-04BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC27-1197223Delaware

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each classEach Class

 

Name of each exchange on which registeredEach Exchange On Which Registered

Common stock,Stock, $.0001 par value $.0001 per share AmericanNew York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o   No x

Boise Inc.

Yes¨Nox

BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

Yes¨Nox

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o  No x

Boise Inc.

Yes¨Nox

BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

Yes¨Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o   No x

Boise Inc.

YesxNo¨

BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

YesxNo¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Boise Inc.

Yes¨No¨

BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

Yes¨No¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendmentamendments to this Form 10-K.xo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. (Check one):

smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Boise Inc.

Large accelerated filero  
Accelerated filer   ¨
o  
Accelerated filer
x
Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting company¨
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)

BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

Large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filerxSmaller reporting company¨
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x  No o

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of the registrant held by non-affiliates as

Boise Inc.

Yes¨Nox

BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

Yes¨Nox

As of June 29, 2007,30, 2010, which was the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $367,310,280.

As of February 8, 2008, the registrant had 51,750,000 shares of common stock, paraggregate market value $0.0001 per share, outstanding.

ALDABRA 2 ACQUISITION CORP.
INDEX
Page
PART I
2
ITEM 1BUSINESS2
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS7
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS25
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES25
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS25
ITEM 4.SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS26
PART II
27
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES27
ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA28
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION29
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK33
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA33
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE53
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES53
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION54
PART III
55
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE55
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION60
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS61
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE63
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES67
68
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES68
1


PART I
Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. (“Aldabra,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is a blank check company, created on February 1, 2007 and organized for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business combination with an operating business. Aldabra’s efforts in identifying a prospective target business have not been limited to a particular industry. Aldabra intends to utilize cash derived from the proceeds of its IPO, its capital stock, debt or a combination of cash, capital stock and debt, in effecting a business combination.
We have focused our efforts on seeking a business combination with a portfolio company currently held by a private equity firm specializing in either leveraged buyouts or venture capital. We believe these types of companies have represented attractive acquisition targets for the following reasons:
·
Substantial Capital Has Been Invested by Private Equity Firms in Recent Years. According to Standard & Poor’s Leveraged Buyout Review, U.S. leveraged buyout volumes have increased from $40.5 billion in 2000 to $521.8 billion for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, a compound annual growth rate of 41.1%. Furthermore, according to Venture Source Analytics, $444.4 billion of venture capital was raised by private companies from 2000 through the first half of 2007.
·
Private Equity Firms Have an Ongoing Need for Investment Realizations. Because most private equity funds are limited life investment vehicles, they continuously seek liquidity events for their portfolio companies.
·
Higher Levels of Leverage Used to Fund Leveraged Buyouts Increase the Need to Divest Non-Core Assets. According to Standard & Poor’s Leveraged Buyout Review, the average debt to EBITDA (adjusted for prospective cost savings or synergies) multiples of leveraged buyout loans for issuers with more than $50 million of EBITDA has increased from 4.2x in 2000 to 5.4x in 2006 and 6.3x in the first three quarters of 2007. Given the higher debt levels, private equity firms have been encouraged to quickly sell non-core assets, which we believe created attractive acquisition targets for us.
Accordingly, our principal strategy in sourcing our business combination was to search for an attractive company held by such an investment fund.
2

We have focused on companies with positive operating cash flow that are well-positioned to capitalize on one of the following two investment themes:
·
Changing Socio-Economics and Demographics. We have focused on portfolio companies that are well positioned to capitalize on certain emerging socioeconomic and demographic trends. While many socioeconomic and demographic trends have been well researched and documented, such as the aging of the population and the growing ethnic base of specific minorities, we believe that few companies have actually altered their strategy to specifically prepare for such trends.
·
Intellectual Property, Proprietary Business Practices and/or Other Intangible Assets. We have focused on companies that have potentially underexploited or not fully-developed intellectual property, proprietary business practices and/or other intangible assets. Such businesses generally have fewer tangible assets and are generally more dependent on the implementation of technology. We have believed that such companies can be acquired for attractive valuations.
Recent Developments
On September 7, 2007, Aldabra entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “purchase agreement”) with Boise Cascade, L.L.C. (“Boise Cascade, L.L.C.,” the “Seller” or the “Target”), a Madison Dearborn Partners, L.L.C. portfolio company, to acquire Boise White Paper, L.L.C., Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C. and Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings Corp. (collectively, the business to be acquired from the Seller, “BPP”).
Pursuant to the purchase agreement, the Company will acquire, through Aldabra Sub LLC, all of the equity interests of Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., which will at such time be the holder of all of the equity interests of Boise White Paper, L.L.C., Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C., Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings Corp. and other assets relating to the paper, packaging and newsprint and related transportation businesses of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. The purchase price for the acquisition (the “Acquisition”) is approximately $1.625 billion, of which approximately $1.338 billion will be paid in cash and the balance will be paid through the issuance of shares of common stock,Inc.’s Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share, of the Company (the “common stock”). The purchase price is subject to adjustmentheld by non-affiliates was approximately $432,546,329 based upon the working capital of the acquired paper, packaging & newsprint businesses and of the Company and its subsidiaries at closing, with the purchase price adjustment to be satisfied through the issuance or redemption of shares of common stock and a subordinated promissory note issued by Aldabra to the Seller. The number of shares of common stock to be issued to the Seller upon closing of the transaction will be based upon the average trading price per share of Aldabra common stock during the 20 day period ending three trading days prior to the closing of the transaction (the “Average Trading Price”). The Company and the Seller have agreed that for purposes of this calculation, the average closing price will not be higher than $10.00 or lower than $9.54. Assuming approximately 30% conversion rights representing 12,347,427 shares are exercised and assuming an average closing price of $9.54,$5.49 per share as quoted on the Seller would receive 37,857,374New York Stock Exchange on that date.

There were 84,355,255 common shares, $.0001 per share par value, of AldabraBoise Inc. and 1,000 common stock, representing approximately 49%units, $.01 per unit par value, of BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC outstanding as of January 31, 2011.

This Form 10-K is a combined annual report being filed separately by two registrants: Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC. BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC meets the Company’s issuedconditions set forth in general instruction I(1)(a) and outstanding shares post-closing. Post Acquisition, the Company will change its name to “Boise Inc.”

3

The affirmative vote(b) of holders of a majority of the shares of Aldabra’s common stock that were issued in its initial public offering (the “IPO” or the “Offering”Form 10-K and the shares, the “IPO Shares”) voting in person or by proxy at the special meeting and the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares voting in person or by proxy (including the holders of the shares were issued prior to Aldabra’s IPO and are held by its directors and executive officers and certain of their affiliates (the “Private Shares”), and which holders agreed to vote all their Private Shares in accordanceis therefore filing this form with the majority ofreduced disclosure format. Unless the votes cast by holders ofcontext indicates otherwise, any reference in this report to the IPO Shares), were required“Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or “Boise” refers to approve the AcquisitionBoise Inc. together with BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and the transactions contemplated thereby.
The purchase agreement and the Acquisition contemplated thereby have been approved and adopted by the Company’s board of directors. At the Company’s special meeting of stockholders on February 5, 2008, the purchase agreement and the Acquisition contemplated thereby were approved by the Company’s stockholders, but are subject to customary closing conditions as well as the obtaining of debt financing in the amount of $946 million (in addition to borrowings to fund any original issue discount or borrowings arising from the exercise of conversion rights). On February 20, 2008, the Company announced that its lenders had priced the debt financingconsolidated subsidiaries.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain information required for Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to the Acquisition and anticipated closing the Acquisition on February 22, 2008.

For a more complete discussion of our proposed business combination, see our DefinitiveBoise Inc. definitive Proxy Statement for its 2011 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, which waswill be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on January 23, 2008.
We expect that the transaction will be consummated on February 22, 2008. However, as described below, if we do not complete a business combination by June 19, 2009, we will be forcedpursuant to dissolve and liquidate.
Conversion Rights
Pursuant to our charter, holdersRegulation 14A of the IPO Shares voting against the Acquisition proposal became entitled to, contemporaneously with such vote, demand that we convert their stock into a pro rata shareSecurities Exchange Act of the trust account. This demand must have been made at the same time that the stockholder voted against the Acquisition proposal. If so demanded, and if the Acquisition is completed, we will convert each share1934, as amended, within 120 days of common stock into a pro rata portion of the trust account in which a substantial portion of the net proceedsBoise Inc.’s year-end.


Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.

Business1

Corporate Structure

2

Paper

2

Packaging

6

Corporate and Other

9

Competition

10

Environmental Issues

11

Capital Investment

11

Seasonality

12

Working Capital

12

Acquisitions and Divestitures

12

Employees

12

Executive Officers of Registrant

12

Item 1A.

Risk Factors14

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments20

Item 2.

Properties20

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings21

Item 4.

(Removed and Reserved)21
PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities22

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data24

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations26

Background

26

Executive Summary

26

Factors That Affect Our Operating Results

30

Our Operating Results

34

Liquidity and Capital Resources

42

Contractual Obligations

48

Off-Balance-Sheet Activities

49

Guarantees

49

Inflationary and Seasonal Influences

49

Disclosures of Financial Market Risks

49

Environmental

50

Critical Accounting Estimates

52

New and Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

56

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk56

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data57
Boise Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements57
BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC Consolidated Financial Statements62
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements67

1.    Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

67

2.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

69

i


 

3.

  Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share   75  
 

4.

  Transactions With Related Parties   75  
 

5.

  Other (Income) Expense   77  
 

6.

  Income Taxes   78  
 

7.

  Leases   84  
 

8.

  Concentrations of Risk   84  
 

9.

  Intangible Assets   85  
 

10.

  Asset Retirement Obligations   86  
 

11.

  Debt   87  
 

12.

  Financial Instruments   91  
 

13.

  Retirement and Benefit Plans   95  
 

14.

  Stockholders’ Equity and Capital   102  
 

15.

  Alternative Fuel Mixture Credits, Net   106  
 

16.

  St. Helens Mill Restructuring   107  
 

17.

  Acquisition of Boise Cascade’s Paper and Packaging Operations   107  
 

18.

  Segment Information   108  
 

19.

  Commitments, Guarantees, and Legal Proceedings   112  
 

20.

  Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited)   113  
 

21.

  Subsequent Events   115  
 

22.

  Consolidating Guarantor and Nonguarantor Financial Information   115  
   
 

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — KPMG LLP

   126  
 

Independent Auditors’ Report — KPMG LLP

   129  

Item 9.

 Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure   130  

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

   130  
 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

   132  

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

   133  
PART III  

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

   134  

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

   135  

Item 12.

 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters   135  

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

   135  

Item 14.

 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

   135  
PART IV  

Item 15.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

   136  
 

Signatures

   137  
 

Index to Exhibits

   138  

ii


PART I

All of our IPO are held, plus interest earned thereon but less any expenses incurred. If a holder opted to exercise his/her conversion rights, then the holder will be converting his/her shares of our common stock for cash and will no longer own these shares. The holder will only be entitled to receive cash for these shares if the holder continues to hold these shares through the closing date of the Acquisition and then tenders his/her stock certificate to us. If the Acquisition is not completed, then these shares will not be converted into cash. A stockholder who exercises conversion rights will continue to own any warrants to acquire our common stock owned by such stockholder as such warrants will remain outstanding and unaffected by the exercise of conversion rights.

4

Liquidation If No Business Combination
Aldabra’s existing charter provides that we will continue in existence only until June 19, 2009. This part of our charter may not be amended except in connectionfilings with the consummation of a business combination. If Aldabra has not completed a business combination by such date, our corporate existence will cease except for the purposes of winding up our affairsSecurities and liquidating, pursuant to Section 278 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”). This has the same effect as if Aldabra’s board of directors and stockholders had formally voted to approve Aldabra’s dissolution pursuant to Section 275 of the DGCL. Accordingly, limiting Aldabra’s corporate existence to a specified date as permitted by Section 102(b)(5) of the DGCL removes the necessity to comply with the formal procedures set forth in Section 275 (which would have required Aldabra’s board of directors and stockholders to formally vote to approve Aldabra’s dissolution and liquidation and to have filed a certificate of dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State). We viewExchange Commission (SEC), which include this termination by June 19, 2009 provision as an obligation to our stockholders, and Aldabra will not take any action to amend or waive this provision to allow the Company to survive for a longer period of time except in connection with the consummation of a business combination.
If Aldabra is unable to complete the Acquisition with BPP, Aldabra will continue to try to consummate a business combination with a different target.
Competition
In identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business, Aldabra may encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to its own if it does not complete the Acquisition with BPP. As of January 1, 2008, there were approximately 70 blank check companies in the United States with approximately $11.4 billion in trust that are actively seeking business combinations. Furthermore, there are a number of additional offerings for blank check companies that are still in the registration process but have not completed an initial public offering. Additionally, Aldabra may be subject to competition from entities other than blank check companies having a business objective similar to ours, including venture capital firms, leverage buyout firms and operating businesses looking to expand their operations through the acquisition of a target business. Many of these entities are well established and have extensive experience identifying and effecting business combinations directly or through affiliates.
5

Many of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources than Aldabra and its financial resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of a target business. Further, the following may not be viewed favorably by certain target businesses:
·Aldabra’s obligation to seek stockholder approval of a business combination may delay the completion of a transaction; and
·Aldabra’s obligation to convert into cash shares of common stock held by its public stockholders that both vote against the business combination and contemporaneously exercise their conversion rights may reduce the resources available to Aldabra for a business combination.
Any of these factors may place Aldabra at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating a business combination. Aldabra’s management believes, however, that its status as a public entity and its existing access to the U.S. public equity markets may give Aldabra a competitive advantage over privately-held entities having a similar business objective as it in acquiring a target business with significant growth potential on favorable terms.
If Aldabra succeeds in effecting this Acquisition and/or a different business combination, there will be, in all likelihood, intense competition from competitors of the business that is acquired by Aldabra.
Aldabra cannot be assured, subsequent to this Acquisition or a different business combination, it will have the resources or ability to compete effectively.
Available Information
The Company’s Internet address is http://aldabracorp2.com. We make available on or through our investor relations page on our website, free of charge, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reportsQuarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, current reportsRegistration Statements, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and beneficial ownershipall related amendments are available free of charge via the Electronic Data Gathering Analysis and Retrieval (EDGAR) System on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. We also provide copies of our SEC filings at no charge upon request and make electronic copies of our reports on Forms 3, 4, and 5 and amendments to those reportsavailable through our website at www.boiseinc.com as soon as reasonably practicable after this material is electronically filedwe file with or furnishedfurnish such reports to the SEC. Attached as exhibits to this Form 10-K are certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required under Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In this filing, unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or “Boise” refer to Boise Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (BZ Intermediate).

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

Boise Inc. is a large, diverse United States-based manufacturer of paper and packaging products. The products we manufacture include papers used for communication, such as office papers, commercial printing papers, envelopes, forms, and newsprint, as well as papers that are associated with packaging, including label and release and flexible papers used for food wrap and other applications. We also manufacture linerboard and corrugating medium, which are combined to make containerboard, the base raw material in our corrugated sheets and containers.

Headquartered in Boise, Idaho, we have approximately 4,100 employees. We own paper mills in the following locations: Jackson, Alabama; International Falls, Minnesota; St. Helens, Oregon; and Wallula, Washington, all of which manufacture imaging, printing, and converting papers. All of these mills, except St. Helens, also manufacture pulp, which is either sold on the market or used in our own operations to manufacture paper.

We also own a mill in DeRidder, Louisiana, which produces linerboard and newsprint. Additionally, we own seven plants that manufacture corrugated packaging products. Our plants in Burley, Idaho; Nampa, Idaho; Sparks, Nevada; Salem, Oregon; Salt Lake City, Utah; and Wallula, Washington, all manufacture corrugated containers. Our plant in Waco, Texas, manufactures corrugated sheets.

Our operations began on February 22, 2008, when entities controlled by Boise Cascade Holdings, L.L.C. (Boise Cascade) sold their paper and packaging assets to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. (the Acquisition). As part of the Acquisition, Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. changed its name to Boise Inc. In this Form 10-K, we use the term “Predecessor” to reference the periods before the Acquisition, including the period when our assets were operated by Boise Cascade.

Since the Acquisition, we have operated and reported our business in three reportable segments: Paper, Packaging, and Corporate and Other (support services). We present information about each of our segments and the geographic areas in which they operate in Note 18, Segment Information, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K.

1


Corporate Structure

The following sets forth our operating structure at December 31, 2010:

Paper

Products

In our Paper segment, we manufacture and sell three general categories of products: (1) communication-based papers; (2) packaging-demand-driven papers; and (3) market pulp. These products can be either commodity papers or papers with specialized or custom features, such as colors, coatings, high brightness, or recycled content, which make them specialty or premium products.

Communication-Based Papers

Imaging papers for the office and home, also known as cut-size office papers.

Printing and converting papers: papers used by commercial printers or converters to manufacture envelopes, forms, and other commercial paper products.

Packaging-Demand-Driven Papers

Label and release papers: These papers include label facestocks, as well as release liners, which our customers combine and convert to labels for use on consumer and commercial packaged products.

Flexible packaging papers: coated and uncoated papers sold to customers that create flexible packaging products for food and nonfood applications.

Corrugating medium: unbleached paperboard, which when corrugated and combined with linerboard, forms corrugated board — the key raw material in the manufacture of corrugated sheets and containers. Corrugating medium is also part of a broader category of products called containerboard.

2


Market Pulp

Market pulp: pulp sold to customers in the open market for use in the manufacture of paper products.

6

We are the third-largest manufacturer of uncoated freesheet papers in North America. Cut-size office papers, printing and converting papers, label and release, and flexible packaging products are a subset of a larger product category called uncoated freesheet papers. Our cut-size office papers account for approximately 57% of segment sales. Total Paper segment capacity, including corrugating medium and market pulp, was approximately 1.5 million short tons (a short ton is equal to 2,000 pounds) at December 31, 2010.

Our strategy in our Paper segment is to focus our two largest paper machines on cut-size commodity office paper. Our long-term supply agreement with OfficeMax allows us to focus our largest paper machines on long, high-volume production runs, to continue to improve the capacity utilization of our largest paper machines, to achieve supply chain efficiencies, and to develop and test product and packaging innovations. We leverage the expertise developed in this relationship to better serve our other customers and to develop new customers and products while pursuing productivity improvements and cost reductions.

We focus our product mix on cut-size office papers and packaging-demand-driven papers to better align ourselves with changing end markets. Many traditional communication paper markets have declined as electronic document transmission and storage alternatives have developed. These declines have varied by specific products. For example, the use of business forms has declined significantly, while cut-size office paper consumption has declined more modestly over the past several years as increased printer placements in home and manufacturing environments have offset reductions in office consumption. Some paper markets, such as label and release papers and flexible packaging papers, are not as sensitive to electronic substitution. Sales volumes of label and release, flexible packaging, and premium office papers grew 13%, during the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with the year ended December 31, 2009.

The following table sets forth capacity and production by product for the periods indicated (in thousands of short tons):

   Boise Inc.       Predecessor 
   Year Ended December 31       January 1
Through
February  21,

    2008    
   Year Ended December 31 
      2010           2009           2008                 2007           2006     
 

Capacity (a)

               

Uncoated freesheet

   1,263     1,265     1,300          1,484     1,547  

Containerboard (medium)

   136     135     136          138     134  

Market pulp

   142     145     136          229     224  
                              
   1,541     1,545     1,572          1,851     1,905  
                              
               
 

Production (b)

               

Uncoated freesheet

   1,229     1,198     1,204        208     1,458     1,520  

Containerboard (medium)

   127     126     118        19     134     132  

Market pulp

   142     114     187        31     221     187  
                                 
   1,498     1,438     1,509        258     1,813     1,839  
                                 

(a)Capacity numbers shown are as of December 31 for the year presented. Capacity assumes production 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, less days allotted for planned maintenance and capital improvements. Accordingly, production can exceed calculated capacity under some operating conditions.

(b)The year ended December 31, 2008, represents operations from February 22, 2008, through December 31, 2008.

3


The following table sets forth segment sales; segment income before interest and taxes; depreciation, amortization, and depletion; and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) for the periods indicated (dollars in millions):

   Boise Inc.       Predecessor 
   Year Ended December 31       January 1
Through
February  21,

2008
   Year Ended December 31 
       2010           2009           2008                 2007           2006     
 

Sales

  $1,458.3    $1,420.0    $1,403.7       $253.5    $1,596.2    $1,494.7  
               

Segment income before interest and taxes

  $151.5    $262.7    $32.7       $20.7    $133.5    $63.3  

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

   87.4     85.2     71.7        0.3     45.0     62.3  
                                 

EBITDA (a) (b)

  $238.9    $347.8    $104.3       $21.1    $178.5    $125.6  
                                 

(a)Segment EBITDA is calculated as segment income before interest (interest income, interest expense, and change in fair value of interest rate derivatives), income tax provision (benefit), and depreciation, amortization, and depletion. EBITDA is the primary measure used by our chief operating decision makers to evaluate segment operating performance and to decide how to allocate resources to segments. See “Part II, Item 6. Selected Financial Data” of this Form 10-K for a description of our reasons for using EBITDA, for a discussion of the limitations of such a measure, and for a reconciliation of our EBITDA to net income (loss).

(b)The year ended December 31, 2009, includes approximately $149.9 million of income from alternative fuel mixture credits.

ITEM 1A. RFacilities

We have four paper mills in the Paper segment, all located in the United States. These mills had an annual capacity of 1.3 million short tons of uncoated freesheet papers as of December 31, 2010. These mills are supported by converting machines that, on a net basis, can produce approximately 0.8 million short tons of cut-size office papers annually.

The following table sets forth the annual capacities of manufacturing locations in our Paper segment as of December 31, 2010, and production for the year then ended (in thousands of short tons):

   Number of
Machines
   Capacity (a)   Production 

PULP AND PAPER MILLS

      

Jackson, Alabama

      

Uncoated freesheet

   2     486     471  

International Falls, Minnesota

      

Uncoated freesheet

   4     531     511  

St. Helens, Oregon

      

Uncoated freesheet

   1     58     58  

Wallula, Washington

      

Uncoated freesheet

   1     188     189  

Containerboard (medium)

   1     136     127  

Market pulp

   1     142     142  
               
   10     1,541     1,498  
               

(a)Capacity assumes production 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, less days allotted for planned maintenance and capital improvements. Accordingly, production can exceed calculated capacity under some operating conditions.

4


ISK FACTORS.Raw Materials and Input Costs

Fiber is our principal raw material in this segment. During the year ended December 31, 2010, fiber costs accounted for approximately 31% of materials, labor, and other operating expenses in this segment. The primary sources of fiber are timber and byproducts of timber. Most of our manufacturing facilities are located in close proximity to active wood markets. Because of the decline in the housing and construction markets, a significant number of building products manufacturers have curtailed or closed their facilities. These curtailments and closures affect the availability and price of wood chips, wood shavings, and other timber byproducts, particularly in the Pacific Northwest. As a result, we have increased our ability to manufacture wood chips from whole logs, which we purchase from third parties. At our mill in Jackson, Alabama, we also utilize recycled fiber to produce our line of recycled office papers.

All of our paper mills, except St. Helens, have on-site pulp production facilities. Some of our paper mills also purchase pulp from third parties pursuant to contractual arrangements. We negotiate these arrangements periodically, and terms can fluctuate based on prevailing pulp market conditions, including pricing and supply dynamics. As we are currently configured and under normal operating conditions, we are a net consumer of pulp, purchasing approximately 80,000 to 110,000 short tons annually.

We purchase raw materials through contracts or open-market purchases. Our contracts are generally with suppliers located in close proximity to the specific facility they supply, and they commonly contain price adjustment mechanisms to account for market price and expense volatility.

Our Paper segment consumes substantial amounts of energy, such as electricity, natural gas, and a modest amount of fuel oil. During the year ended December 31, 2010, energy costs accounted for approximately 13% of materials, labor, and other operating expenses in this segment. We purchase substantial portions of our natural gas and electricity under supply contracts. Under most of these contracts, the providers are contractually bound to provide us with all of our needs for a particular type of energy at a specific facility. Most of these contracts have pricing mechanisms that adjust or set prices based on current market prices. We also use derivative instruments such as three-way collars, caps, call spreads, and swaps, or a combination of these instruments, to mitigate price risk for our energy requirements. For more information about our derivative instruments, see “Disclosures of Financial Market Risks” in “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Form 10-K.

We consume a significant amount of chemicals in the production of paper. Important chemicals we use include starch, caustic, sodium chlorate, precipitated calcium carbonate, dyestuffs, and optical brighteners. During the year ended December 31, 2010, chemical costs accounted for approximately 15% of materials, labor, and other operating expenses in this segment. Many of our chemicals are purchased under contracts, which provide more stability than open-market purchases. These contracts are negotiated periodically at prevailing rates.

Sales, Marketing, and Distribution

Our uncoated freesheet paper is sold primarily by our own sales personnel. We ship to customers both directly from our mills and through distribution centers and a network of outside warehouses. This allows us to respond quickly to customer requirements.

5


The following table sets forth sales volumes of paper and paper products for the periods indicated (in thousands of short tons):

   Boise Inc.       Predecessor 
   Year Ended December 31       January 1
Through
February  21,

    2008    
   Year Ended December 31 
       2010           2009           2008                 2007           2006     
 

Commodity

   784     844     768        164     995     999  

Premium and specialty

   449     407     432        72     480     498  
                                 

Uncoated freesheet

   1,233     1,251     1,200        236     1,475     1,497  
               

Containerboard (medium)

   127     127     118        19     134     132  

Market pulp

   81     58     102        20     145     112  
                                 
   1,441     1,436     1,420        275     1,754     1,741  
                                 

Customers

Our largest customer in this segment is OfficeMax. During the year ended December 31, 2010, sales to OfficeMax accounted for $504.2 million of Paper segment sales. Sales to OfficeMax constitute 38% of total uncoated freesheet paper sales volume and 61% of our office papers sales volume. Pursuant to a long-standing contractual agreement, OfficeMax has agreed to purchase its full North American requirements for cut-size office paper from Boise Inc. through December 2012. OfficeMax’s purchase obligations under the agreement will phase out ratably over a four-year period beginning one year after the delivery of notice of termination, but in no event will the purchase obligation be reduced prior to December 31, 2012. The price for paper sold under this supply agreement approximates market prices. However, due to the structure of the contract, price changes to OfficeMax lag the market by up to 60 days.

In addition to OfficeMax, we have approximately 700 uncoated freesheet paper customers. Our customers include paper merchants, commercial and financial printers, paper converters such as envelope and form manufacturers, and customers who use our paper for specialty applications such as label and release products. In addition to the paper supply agreement with OfficeMax, we have long-term relationships with many other informationcustomers. No single customer, other than OfficeMax, exceeds 6% of segment sales.

Packaging

Products

In our Packaging segment, we manufacture and sell linerboard, which is used to manufacture corrugated sheets and containers. We also manufacture newsprint.

Packaging

Linerboard: paperboard, which when combined with corrugating medium, forms corrugated board — the key raw material in the manufacture of corrugated sheets and containers. Linerboard is also part of a broader category of products called containerboard.

Corrugated sheets: containerboard sheets that are sold primarily to converters that produce a variety of corrugated products.

Corrugated containers: corrugated sheets that have been fed through converting machines to create containers, which are used in the packaging of fresh fruit and vegetables, processed food, beverages, and other industrial and consumer products.

Newsprint: paper commonly used for printing newspapers, other publications, and advertising material.

6


During the year ended December 31, 2010, our Packaging segment produced approximately 602,000 short tons of linerboard and our Paper segment produced approximately 127,000 short tons of corrugating medium, both of which are used in the production of containerboard. During the year ended December 31, 2010, our corrugated container and sheet feeder plants consumed approximately 500,000 short tons of containerboard (including both linerboard and corrugating medium) or the equivalent of 69% of our containerboard production.

We operate our Packaging segment to maximize profitability through integration of our containerboard and converting operations and through operational improvements in our facilities to lower costs and improve efficiency. We plan to increase our integration levels through acquisitions and leverage our corrugated container position. We are a low-volume producer of newsprint, and we believe that our newsprint production has a low delivered cost to southern U.S. markets.

The following table sets forth capacity and production by product for the periods indicated (in thousands of short tons):

  Boise Inc.     Predecessor 
  Year Ended December 31     January 1
Through
February  21,

    2008    
  Year Ended December 31 
      2010          2009          2008              2007          2006     
 

Capacity (a)

        

Containerboard (linerboard)

  610    610    600       575    559  

Newsprint

  225    225    410       425    426  
                       
  835    835    1,010       1,000    985  
                       
 

Production (b)

        

Containerboard (linerboard)

  602    544    446      83    573    554  

Newsprint

  229    188    331      59    409    415  
                          
  831    732    777      142    982    969  
                          

 

(a)     Capacity numbers are shown as of December 31 for the year presented. Capacity assumes production 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, less days allotted for planned maintenance and capital improvements. Accordingly, production can exceed calculated capacity under some operating conditions.

 

(b)     The year ended December 31, 2008, represents operations from February 22, 2008, through December 31, 2008.

 

The following table sets forth segment sales; segment income before interest and taxes; depreciation, amortization, and depletion; and EBITDA for the periods indicated (dollars in millions):

 

          

        

   

  Boise Inc.     Predecessor 
  Year Ended December 31     January 1
Through
February  21,

    2008    
  Year Ended December 31 
      2010          2009          2008              2007          2006     
 

Sales

 $671.9   $588.4   $703.7     $113.5   $783.1   $766.5  
 

Segment income before interest and taxes

 $65.0   $67.1   $21.1     $5.7   $40.1   $45.3  

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

  38.6    42.2    35.1      0.1    37.7    50.8  
                          

EBITDA (a) (b)

 $103.6   $109.3   $56.2     $5.7   $77.8   $96.1  
                          

(a)Segment EBITDA is calculated as segment income before interest (interest income, interest expense, and change in fair value of interest rate derivatives), income tax provision (benefit), and depreciation, amortization, and depletion. EBITDA is the primary measure used by our chief operating decision makers to evaluate segment operating performance and to decide how to allocate resources to segments. See “Part II, Item 6. Selected Financial Data” of this Form 10-K for a description of our reasons for using EBITDA, for a discussion of the limitations of such a measure, and for a reconciliation of our EBITDA to net income (loss).

(b)The year ended December 31, 2009, includes approximately $61.6 million of income from alternative fuel mixture credits.

7


We manufactured approximately 229,000 short tons of newsprint during the year ended December 31, 2010, for use primarily in printing daily newspapers and other publications in North America. Demand for newsprint in North America has declined dramatically in the last several years and may continue to decline as newspapers are replaced with electronic media.

Facilities

We manufacture containerboard (linerboard) and newsprint at our mill in DeRidder, Louisiana. This mill’s annual production capacity is approximately 835,000 short tons as of December 31, 2010. We also manufacture corrugated containers and sheets at seven plants, with an aggregate annual capacity of approximately 7,900million square feet (which assumes operating the plants five days a week, 24 hours a day).

The following table sets forth annual capacities of our containerboard (linerboard) and newsprint mill in DeRidder, Louisiana, as of December 31, 2010, and production for the year then ended (in thousands of short tons):

   Number of
Machines
   Capacity (a)   Production 

PULP AND PAPER MILL

      

DeRidder, Louisiana

      

Containerboard (linerboard)

   1     610     602  

Newsprint

   1     225     229  
               
   2     835     831  
               

(a)Capacity assumes production 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, less days allotted for planned maintenance and capital improvements. Accordingly, production can exceed calculated capacity under some operating conditions.

Raw Materials and Input Costs

Wood fiber is the principal raw material in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following factors should be considered in evaluating the Companysegment. The primary sources of wood fiber are timber and its business. byproducts, such as wood chips. During the year ended December 31, 2010, wood fiber costs accounted for approximately 18% of materials, labor, and other operating expenses in this segment. We generally purchase raw materials through market-based contracts or on the open market from suppliers located in close proximity to DeRidder.

Our futurePackaging segment consumes substantial amounts of energy, such as electricity and natural gas. During the year ended December 31, 2010, energy costs accounted for approximately 12% of materials, labor, and other operating results depend upon manyexpenses in this segment. We purchase substantial portions of our natural gas and electricity under supply contracts. Under most of these contracts, the providers are contractually bound to supply us with all of our needs for a particular type of energy at a specific facility. Our natural gas contracts have pricing mechanisms based primarily on current market prices, and our electricity contracts have pricing mechanisms based primarily on published tariffs. We also use derivative instruments such as three-way collars, caps, call spreads, and swaps, or a combination of these instruments, to mitigate price risk for our energy requirements. For more information about our derivative instruments, see “Disclosures of Financial Market Risks” in “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Form 10-K.

We consume chemicals in the manufacturing of our Packaging segment products. Important chemicals we use include pulping and bleaching chemicals such as caustic, starch, sulfuric acid, and other sulfur-based chemicals. During the year ended December 31, 2010, chemical costs accounted

8


for approximately 6% of materials, labor, and other operating expenses in this segment. Many of our chemicals are purchased under contracts, which provide more stability than open-market purchases. These contracts are negotiated periodically at prevailing rates.

Sales, Marketing, and Distribution

Our containerboard (linerboard), corrugated containers and sheets, and newsprint are sold by our own sales personnel or brokers.

The following table sets forth sales volumes of containerboard (linerboard) and newsprint (in thousands of short tons) and corrugated containers and sheets (in millions of square feet) for the periods indicated:

   Boise Inc.      Predecessor 
   Year Ended December 31      January 1
Through
February  21,

2008
       Year Ended December 31     
       2010           2009           2008                2007           2006     
 

Containerboard (linerboard)

   225     253     194       36     239     266  

Newsprint

   231     199     326       56     415     411  
 

Corrugated containers and sheets

   6,735     5,963     5,337       914     6,609     6,599  

Customers

During the year ended December 31, 2010, approximately 37% of our linerboard volume was sold in the open market, both domestically and internationally. The remaining volume was used in our operations. We consume virtually all of the corrugating medium we produce. We sell our finished corrugated containers to approximately 1,100 active customers, including large agricultural producers and food and beverage processors. We sell corrugated sheets to over 200 converters, who use the sheets to manufacture corrugated containers for a variety of customers.

We have a focused position in the agricultural and food markets for corrugated containers. We service these less cyclical end markets with our strategically located corrugated container operations. With our regional focus and footprint, we are able to service our customers’ needs from multiple plants, schedule operating runs to maximize productivity, and reduce waste and better utilize different paper roll sizes. We believe this position in favorable end markets has made us more resistant to economic downturns. We sell our newsprint to newspaper publishers located in regional markets near our DeRidder, Louisiana, manufacturing facility and to a lesser extent to export markets primarily in Latin America.

Corporate and Other

Our Corporate and Other segment includes primarily corporate support services, related assets and liabilities, and foreign exchange gains and losses. This segment also includes transportation assets, such as rail cars and trucks, which we use to transport our products from our manufacturing sites. We provide transportation services not only to our own facilities but also, on a limited basis, to third parties when geographic proximity and logistics are favorable. Rail cars and trucks are generally leased. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, and the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, segment sales related primarily to our rail and truck business were $65.4 million, $63.8 million, $67.7 million, and $8.5 million, respectively.

9


The following table sets forth segment sales; segment income (loss) before interest and taxes; loss on extinguishment of debt; depreciation, amortization, and depletion; and EBITDA for the periods indicated (dollars in millions):

  Boise Inc.      Predecessor 
  Year Ended December 31      January 1
Through
February  21,

2008
  Year Ended December 31 
      2010          2009          2008               2007          2006     
 

Sales

 $65.4   $63.8   $67.7      $8.5   $58.9   $61.4  
 

Segment income (loss) before interest and taxes

 $(21.6 $(21.5 $(18.6    $(3.2 $(11.9 $(14.9

Loss on extinguishment of debt

  (22.2  (44.1                   

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

  3.9    4.1    3.2       0.1    1.9    3.3  
                           

EBITDA (a) (b)

 $(39.9 $(61.5 $(15.4    $(3.1 $(10.0 $(11.6
                           

(a)Segment EBITDA is calculated as segment income (loss) before interest (interest income, interest expense, and change in fair value of interest rate derivatives), income tax provision (benefit), and depreciation, amortization, and depletion. EBITDA is the primary measure used by our chief operating decision makers to evaluate segment operating performance and to decide how to allocate resources to segments. See “Part II, Item 6. Selected Financial Data” of this Form 10-K for a description of our reasons for using EBITDA, for a discussion of the limitations of such a measure, and for a reconciliation of our EBITDA to net income (loss).

(b)The year ended December 31, 2009, includes approximately $3.9 million of expense from alternative fuel mixture credits.

Competition

The markets in which we operate are large and highly competitive. Our products and services compete with similar products manufactured and distributed by others both domestically and globally. Many factors influence our competitive position in each of our operating segments. Those factors include price, service, quality, product selection, and convenience of location as well as our manufacturing and overhead costs.

Some of our competitors in each of our segments are subject to various riskslarger than we are and uncertainties. The known material riskshave greater financial resources. These resources afford those competitors greater purchasing power, increased financial flexibility, and uncertaintiesmore capital resources for expansion and improvement, which may causeenable those competitors to compete more effectively than we can.

Paper.    The markets in which our operating results to vary from anticipated results or which may negatively affect our operating resultsPaper segment competes are large and profitabilityhighly competitive. Commodity grades of uncoated freesheet paper are as follows:

Risks Associatedglobally traded, with the Acquisition
If the Acquisition’s benefits do not meet the expectations of the marketplace, investors, financial analysts or industry analysts, the market price of Aldabra’s common stock may decline.
The market price of our common stock may decline as a result of the Acquisition if Boise Inc. does not perform as expected or if we do not otherwise achieve the perceived benefits of the Acquisition as rapidly as, or to the extent anticipated by, the marketplace, investors, financial analysts or industry analysts. Accordingly, investors may experience a loss as a result of a decreasing stock price, and we may not be able to raise future capital, if necessary, in the equity markets.
Stock ownership of Aldabra after the Acquisition will be highly concentrated,numerous worldwide manufacturers, and as a result, Boise Cascade, L.L.C. will influence Aldabra’s affairs significantly.
Immediately afterthese products compete primarily on the Acquisition is consummated, Boise Cascade, L.L.C. will own approximately 49%basis of price. All of our paper manufacturing facilities are located in the United States, and although we compete primarily in the domestic market, we do face competition from foreign producers, some of which have lower operating costs than we do. The level of this competition varies, depending on domestic and foreign demand and foreign currency exchange rates. In general, paper production does not rely on proprietary processes or formulas, except in highly specialized or custom grades.

North American uncoated freesheet paper producers shipped 10.9 million short tons in 2010, and four major manufacturers account for approximately 66% of capacity, according to Resource Information Systems Inc. (RISI) and our estimates. As of December 31, 2010, we believe that we are the third-largest producer of uncoated freesheet paper in North America. Our largest competitors include Domtar Corporation (the largest producer), International Paper Company, and Georgia-Pacific LLC. Although price is the primary basis for competition in most of our paper grades, quality and service are important competitive determinants, especially in premium and specialty grades. Our uncoated freesheet papers compete with electronic data transmission, document storage alternatives, and paper grades we do not produce. Increasing shifts to these alternatives and increasing use of the Internet have had, and are likely

10


to continue to have, an adverse effect on traditional print media and paper usage. These secular trends are in addition to the current demand decline driven by a weak economy and reduced white-collar employment.

Major uncoated freesheet paper producers, including Boise Inc., have closed or significantly curtailed capacity in response to lower demand in recent years. In December 2008, we permanently closed the pulp mill and two of our three paper machines at our St. Helens, Oregon, facility. Our production curtailment in 2010 was significantly less than in 2009; however, we may choose to take downtime or slow production in the future if market conditions warrant.

Packaging.    North American containerboard (corrugating medium and linerboard) manufacturers produced 36.2 million short tons in 2010, and five major manufacturers account for approximately 71% of capacity, according to RISI and our estimates. Our largest competitors include International Paper Company, Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, Georgia-Pacific LLC, Temple-Inland Inc., and Packaging Corporation of America. Rock-Tenn Company recently announced its intent to acquire Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation. Containerboard (corrugating medium and linerboard) and newsprint are globally traded commodities with numerous worldwide manufacturers. Although price is the primary basis for competition in most of our packaging grades, quality and service are important competitive determinants. The intensity of competition in these industries fluctuates based on demand and supply levels as well as prevailing foreign currency exchange rates. Our corrugated container operations in the Pacific Northwest have a leading regional market position and compete with several national and regional manufacturers. Our plant in Waco, Texas, known as Central Texas Corrugated, or CTC, produces corrugated sheets that are sold to sheet plants in the Southwest, where they are converted into corrugated containers for a variety of customers. Some of our competitors have lower operating costs and/or enjoy greater integration between their containerboard production and corrugated container production than we do.

North American newsprint producers shipped 7.9 million metric tonnes (a metric tonne is equal to 2,205 pounds) in 2010, and three major manufacturers account for approximately 76% of capacity, according to RISI and our estimates. Our largest competitors include AbitibiBowater Inc., White Birch Paper Company, and Kruger Inc.

Demand for newsprint has declined dramatically in the last several years and may continue to decline as electronic media compete with newspapers. Major producers have closed significant capacity and taken substantial downtime as demand has fallen. In 2009, we announced that we had indefinitely idled the D2 newsprint machine at our mill in DeRidder, Louisiana. As of December 31, 2010, our remaining newsprint machine was running at full capacity. During 2010, our capacity and production were reduced only for scheduled maintenance.

Environmental Issues

Our discussion of environmental issues is presented under the caption “Environmental” in “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings” of this Form 10-K.

Capital Investment

Information concerning our capital expenditures is presented under the caption “Investment Activities” in “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Form 10-K.

11


Seasonality

Our businesses experience some seasonality, based primarily on buying patterns associated with particular products. For example, the demand for our corrugated containers is influenced by changes in agricultural demand in the Pacific Northwest. In addition, seasonally cold weather increases costs, especially energy consumption, at all of our manufacturing facilities. Seasonality also affects working capital levels as described below.

Working Capital

Working capital levels fluctuate throughout the year and are affected by seasonality, scheduled annual maintenance shutdowns, and changing sales patterns. Typically, we build working capital in our Paper segment at the end of the fourth quarter, as we build finished goods inventory in preparation for first-quarter sales. Finished goods inventories are also increased prior to scheduled annual maintenance shutdowns to maintain sales volumes while production is stopped. Inventories for some raw materials, such as fiber, exhibit seasonal swings, as we increase log and chip inventories to ensure ample supply of fiber to our mills throughout the winter. In our Packaging segment, agricultural demand influences working capital, as finished good inventory levels are increased in preparation for the harvest season in third and fourth quarters. Changes in sales volumes can affect accounts receivable levels in both our Paper and Packaging segments, influencing overall working capital levels. We believe our management practices with respect to working capital conform to common business practices in the U.S.

Acquisitions and Divestitures

We may engage in acquisition and divestiture discussions with other companies and make acquisitions and divestitures from time to time. We review our operations and dispose of assets that fail to meet our criteria for return on investment or cease to warrant retention for other reasons.

On February 21, 2011, our wholly owned subsidiary, Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the Agreement) to purchase all of the outstanding stock assuming an Average Trading Price of $9.54 per shareTharco Packaging, Inc., for $200 million of cash consideration, subject to adjustments set forth in the Agreement. This acquisition, which closed on March 1, 2011, expands our presence in packaging markets; extends our geographical reach from the Pacific Northwest to California, Colorado, Arizona, and assumingGeorgia; and increases our containerboard integration to over 85% from approximately 70%.  We obtained appropriate consents from our lenders to enable the acquisition under our Credit Facilities.

Employees

As of January 31, 2011, we had approximately 4,100 employees. Approximately 57% of these employees worked pursuant to collective bargaining agreements. As of January 31, 2011, approximately 50% of our employees were working pursuant to collective bargaining agreements that approximately 30%have expired or will expire within one year. We do not expect material work interruptions or increases in our costs during the course of Aldabra stockholders exercised their conversion rights. Asthe negotiations with our collective bargaining units. Nevertheless, if our expectations are not accurate, we could experience a result,material labor disruption or significantly increased labor costs at one or more of our facilities, any of which could prevent us from meeting customer demand or reduce our sales and profitability.

Executive Officers of Registrant

The following individuals are deemed our “executive officers” pursuant to Section 16 of the Seller will have significant representation onSecurities Exchange Act of 1934. Our executive officers are elected by our board of directors and will have the voting power to significantly influence our policies, businesshold office until their successors are elected and affairs, and will also have the ability to influence the outcome ofqualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. There are no arrangements or understandings between any corporate transaction or other matter, including mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentration in control may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change of control that otherwise could result in a premium in the priceexecutive officers and any other

12


persons pursuant to which they were selected as officers. No family relationships exist among any of our common stock.

In addition, as longexecutive officers.

Alexander Toeldte, 51, President and Chief Executive Officer, Director Mr. Toeldte has served as the holderscompany’s president and chief executive officer and a director since February 2008. Mr. Toeldte joined Boise Cascade Holdings, L.L.C., in early October 2005 as president of the Seller’s registration rightscompany’s Packaging and Newsprint segment and in late October 2005 became its executive vice president, Paper and Packaging and Newsprint segments. From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Toeldte was chair of Algonac Limited, a private management and consulting firm based in Auckland, New Zealand. Mr. Toeldte’s previous experience includes serving as executive vice president of Fonterra Co-operative Group, Ltd., and chief executive officer of Fonterra Enterprises (Fonterra, based in New Zealand, is a global dairy company). Previously, Mr. Toeldte served in various capacities with respect to the shares of Aldabra common stock issued to the Seller pursuant to the Acquisition or any other shares of Aldabra common stock that it acquires (the “Seller Registrable Securities”) control 33% or moreFletcher Challenge Limited Group (formerly one of the Aldabra common stock issued to the Seller at the closing, we will be subject to restrictions on our business activities pursuant to the termslargest companies in New Zealand, with holdings in paper, forestry, building materials, and energy) including as chief executive officer of an investor rights agreement byFletcher Challenge Building and between Aldabra, the Seller and certain directors and officersas chief executive officer of Aldabra. More specifically, for so long as the 33% ownership threshold is met or exceeded, the investor rights agreement will restrict us from conducting specified activities or taking specified actions without the affirmative written consentFletcher Challenge Paper, both of which were publicly traded units of the holdersFletcher Challenge Limited Group. Mr. Toeldte also served as a partner at McKinsey & Company in Toronto, Brussels, Montreal, and Stockholm. Mr. Toeldte is vice chairman of a majority of the Seller Registrable Securities then outstanding. The restricted activities include, without limitation, making distributions on our equity securities, redemptions, purchases or acquisitions of our equity securities, issuances or sales of equity securities or securities exchangeable or convertible for equity securities, issuing debt or convertible/exchangeable debt securities, making loans, advances or guarantees, mergers and/or acquisitions, asset sales, liquidations, recapitalizations, non-ordinary business activities, making changes to our organizational documents, making changes to arrangements with our officers, directors, employees and other related persons, incurrence of indebtedness for borrowed money or capital leases above specified thresholds and consummating a sale of Aldabra. Additionally, pursuant to affirmative covenants under the investor rights agreement (and subject to the same 33% ownership threshold), unless the holders of a majority of the Seller Registrable Securities then outstanding have otherwise consented in writing, we are required to perform specified activities, including, without limitation, preservation of our corporate existence and material licenses, authorizations and permits necessary to the conduct of our business, maintenance of our material properties, discharge of certain statutory liens, performance under material contracts, compliance with applicable laws and regulations, preservation of adequate insurance coverage and maintenance of proper books of record and account.

7

If we are unable to consummate a business combination within the prescribed time frame and are forced to dissolve and distribute our assets, the amount that holders could receive per IPO Share upon the distribution of trust account fund could decrease, and our warrants will expire worthless.
Aldabra’s amended and restated charter provides that it will continue in existence only until June 19, 2009. This provision may not be amended except in connection with the consummation of a business combination. If Aldabra has not completed a business combination by such date, its corporate existence will cease except for the purposes of winding up its affairs and liquidating, pursuant to Section 278 of the DGCL. This has the same effect as if Aldabra’s board of directors and stockholders had formally voted to approve Aldabra’s dissolution pursuant to Section 275 of the DGCL.
If we are unableAmerican Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA). Mr. Toeldte studied economics at the Albert-Ludwigs-Universität in Freiburg, Germany, and received an M.B.A. from McGill University in Montreal, Canada.

Robert A. Warren, 58, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Mr. Warren has served as our executive vice president and chief operating officer since November 2010. From April 2008 to completeOctober 2010, he served as senior vice president and general manager of our paper operations and supply chain management function. From February 2008 to April 2008, Mr. Warren served as general manager of our supply chain management function. From 2006 to February 2008, Mr. Warren served as general manager of Boise Cascade, L.L.C.’s supply chain management function, and from October 2004 to 2005, he was the business leader for Boise Cascade, L.L.C.’s printing papers business. From 2003 to October 2004, Mr. Warren was a project leader for Boise Cascade Corporation. Prior to joining Boise Cascade Corporation, Mr. Warren was the president and chief executive officer for Strategy in Action Group, a private business combination by June 19, 2009consulting firm. Mr. Warren received a B.S. in General Engineering from Oregon State University and must dissolvean M.B.A. from Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University.

Samuel K. Cotterell, 59, Senior Vice President and liquidateChief Financial Officer Mr. Cotterell has served as our assets,senior vice president and chief financial officer since January 2011. From February 2008 to December 2010, Mr. Cotterell served as our vice president and controller. From October 2004 to February 2008, Mr. Cotterell served as vice president and controller of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. From 1999 to October 2004, Mr. Cotterell served as director of financial reporting of Boise Cascade Corporation. Mr. Cotterell received a B.A. in Spanish from the fundsUniversity of Idaho, a B.S. in Accounting from Boise State University, and a Masters of International Business from the trust account would be distributed pro rataAmerican Graduate School of International Management. Mr. Cotterell is a certified public accountant.

Karen E. Gowland, 52, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary Ms. Gowland has served as our senior vice president, general counsel, and secretary since August 2010. From February 2008 to July 2010, she served as our vice president, general counsel, and secretary. From October 2004 to February 2008, Ms. Gowland served as vice president, general counsel and secretary of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. From 1997 to October 2004, Ms. Gowland served as vice president, corporate secretary, and associate general counsel of Boise Cascade Corporation. From 1989 to 1997, Ms. Gowland was associate general counsel of Boise Cascade Corporation, and from 1984 to 1989, she was counsel of Boise Cascade Corporation. Ms. Gowland received a B.S. in Accounting and a J.D. from the University of Idaho.

13


Jeffrey P. Lane, 55, Senior Vice President and General Manager, Packaging Mr. Lane has served as senior vice president and general manager of our packaging operations since April 2008. Prior to joining the company, Mr. Lane was a partner at McKinsey & Company from 1989 to 1995 and from 1998 until 2008. From 2000 until 2008, Mr. Lane led McKinsey’s global packaging industry practice. Mr. Lane served as the president of MicroCoating Technologies, an advanced materials technology start-up, during 1997 and served as the vice president of marketing and business development for Westinghouse Security Systems, a division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, during 1996. From 1983 to 1989, Mr. Lane served as brand manager at The Procter & Gamble Company, a global consumer products company. Mr. Lane received a B.S. in Biology from Georgia Institute of Technology and an M.B.A. from Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University.

Judith M. Lassa, 52, Senior Vice President, Paper and Specialty Products Ms. Lassa has served as senior vice president and general manager of our paper and specialty products operations since November 2010. From February 2008 to October 2010, Ms. Lassa served as vice president of our Packaging segment. From October 2004 to February 2008, Ms. Lassa served as vice president, Packaging, of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. From 2000 to October 2004, Ms. Lassa served as vice president, Packaging, of Boise Cascade Corporation, and from 1997 to 2000, she served as packaging business leader of Boise Cascade Corporation. Ms. Lassa received a B.S. in Paper Science and Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point.

Robert E. Strenge, 56, Senior Vice President, Manufacturing —Mr. Strenge has served as senior vice president of our paper manufacturing operations since April 2008. From February 2008 to April 2008, Mr. Strenge served as vice president of our Newsprint segment. From October 2004 to February 2008, Mr. Strenge served as vice president of the Newsprint segment of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. From 2003 to October 2004, Mr. Strenge served as vice president of Boise Cascade Corporation’s DeRidder operations, and from 1997 to 2003, he served as mill manager of Boise Cascade Corporation’s St. Helens, Oregon, paper mill. Mr. Strenge received a B.S. in Pulp and Paper Technology from Syracuse University.

Bernadette M. Madarieta, 35, Vice President and Controller —Ms. Madarieta has served as our vice president and controller since February 2011. From February 2008 to January 2011, Ms. Madarieta served as vice president and controller of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. From October 2004 to January 2008, Ms. Madarieta served as Boise Cascade, L.L.C.’s director of financial reporting. From 2002 to October 2004, Ms. Madarieta served as supervisor of external financial reporting for Boise Cascade Corporation. Prior to joining Boise Cascade Corporation, Ms. Madarieta was an assurance and business advisory manager at KPMG and Arthur Andersen, where she was responsible for planning and supervising audit engagements for corporations and privately held companies. Ms. Madarieta received a B.B.A. in Accounting from Boise State University and is a certified public accountant.

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

In addition to the Aldabra stockholders (other than holdersrisks and uncertainties we discuss elsewhere in this Form 10-K (particularly in “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Private Shares, who have waivedFinancial Condition and Results of Operations”) or in our other filings with the SEC, the following are some important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those we project in any right to any liquidating distributionforward-looking statement. We cannot guarantee that our actual results will be consistent with respect to the Private Shares). The per-share liquidating distribution could be reduced because of claims or potential claims of creditors.

In addition, our outstanding warrants are not entitled to participateforward-looking statements we make in a liquidating distribution,this report, and the warrants will therefore expire and become worthless if we dissolve and liquidate before completing a business combination. Furthermore, the Private Shares held by Aldabra’s directors and executive officers and their affiliates (the “Aldabra Insider stockholders”) will also be worthless, as Aldabra Insider Stockholders have agreed that they are not entitled to receive any liquidation proceeds with respect to such shares.
8

If we lose our key management and technical personnel, our business may suffer.
After the Acquisition, we will rely upon a relatively small group of key managers who have extensive experience in the paper and packaging and newsprint businesses. We do not expectassume an obligation to maintainupdate any key man insurance. The loss of management or an inability to attract or retain other key individuals following the Acquisition could materially and adversely affect our business. We will seek to compensate management, as well as other employees, through competitive salaries, bonuses and other incentive plans, but there can be no assurance that these programs will allow us to retain key management executives or hire new key employees.
forward-looking statement.

14


Members of Aldabra’s board of directors have interests in the Acquisition that are different from the interests of Aldabra’s common stockholders. If the Acquisition is not approved, there is a possibility that their shares could become worthless.

Members of our board of directors have arrangements that provide them with interests in the Acquisition that differ from, or are in addition to, those of our stockholders generally. Our directors, as holders of Private Shares, have waived their respective rights to participate in any liquidation distribution with respect to shares acquired by them prior to our IPO. Therefore, if the Acquisition is not approved and Aldabra does not consummate a business combination prior to June 19, 2009, their Private Shares and the warrants purchased by Messrs. Leight and Weiss in a private placement (the “Aldabra Insider Warrants”) will become worthless. Alternatively, if the Acquisition is approved, Aldabra’s officers and directors will benefit because they will continue to hold their Aldabra shares. Furthermore, Messrs. Leight and Weiss and/or trusts established for the benefit of their respective families have an ownership interest in Madison Dearborn Capital Partners IV, L.P. of approximately 0.0124% (approximately 1⁄80th of 1%) and 0.0248% (approximately 1⁄40th of 1%), respectively, which beneficially owns approximately 76.7% of the Seller. Therefore, the personal and financial interests of our board of directors may have influenced their motivation in identifying and selecting a targetAdverse business and completing a business combination before June 19, 2009 (the time frame required by our charter). As a result, their discretion in identifying and selecting a suitable target businesseconomic conditions may have resulted in a conflict of interest when determining whether the terms, conditions and timing of a particular business combination were appropriate and in our stockholders’ best interests.
Because approximately 30% of Aldabra’s stockholders exercised their right to convert their shares into cash, Aldabra’s current stockholders will end up owning approximately 51% of Boise Inc.’s shares, and Boise Inc. will incur additional indebtedness.
After giving effect to the Acquisition and based upon a conversion rate of approximately 30%, our stockholders at the closing of the Acquisition will become the owners of approximately 51% of Boise Inc.’s outstanding common stock In addition, because the amount of cash in our trust fund available for our use to fund the purchase price has been decreased by the amount necessary to pay the converting stockholders and due to certain working capital adjustments, the aggregate number of shares of Aldabra common stock to be issued at the time of the closing to the Seller will be 37,857,374 and additional indebtedness of approximately $108.4 million (including taking into account the original issue discount on the increase in the second lien facility) will be incurred.
9

The expected amount of post-Acquisition indebtedness could adversely affect Aldabra’s financial condition and impair its ability to operate Boise Inc.
Assuming the Acquisition is consummated and approximately 30% of Aldabra stockholders exercise their conversion rights, Boise Inc. will have approximately $1,107 million of outstanding indebtedness (consisting of approximately $1,066 million under the new credit facilities and approximately $41 million under the subordinated promissory note to the Seller; this subordinated promissory note could increase or decrease based on working capital adjustments by both the Company and BPP post-closing). The level of indebtedness incurred by Aldabra in connection with the Acquisition could have important consequences on our business, financial condition and operating results, including the following:
·It may limit our ability to borrow money or sell stock to fund our working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements and other financing needs;
·Our interest expense would increase if interest rates generally rise because a substantial portion of our indebtedness, including all of our indebtedness under our new credit facilities, bears interest at floating rates;
·It may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and future business opportunities;
·We will be subject to debt covenants that may restrict management’s ability to make certain business decisions;
·Boise Inc. may be more highly leveraged than some of its competitors, which may place it at a competitive disadvantage;
·It may make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our business, our industry or the economy in general;
·A substantial portion of Boise Inc.’s cash flow from operations may be dedicated to the repayment of indebtedness, including indebtedness we may incur in the future, and will not be available for other business purposes; and
·There would be a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition if we were unable to service our indebtedness or obtain additional financing as needed.
10

Boise Inc.’s operations may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to meet Aldabra’s debt service obligations.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures depends on our ability to generate cash from Boise Inc.’s future operations. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. As a result, it is possible that Boise Inc. may not generate sufficient cash flow from its operations to enable us to repay our indebtedness, make interest payments and to fund other liquidity needs. To the extent Boise Inc. does not generate sufficient cash flow to meet these requirements, it would impact Boise Inc.’s ability to operate as a going concern.
The indebtedness to be incurred by us under the new credit facilities will bear interest at variable rates, in which case increases in interest rates would cause our debt service requirements to increase. In such a case, we might need to refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. However, we may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, including the new credit facilities, on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Following the Acquisition, our expected debt service obligation, assuming interest rates stay at February 15, 2008 levels, is initially estimated to be approximately $91 million in cash interest payments and fees per annum, which amount will be reduced each year in accordance with scheduled debt amortization payments, if made. In addition, debt service requirements will also include scheduled annual principal payments starting at $8.0 million during 2008 and will rise to a maximum of $447.7 million in 2014.
These above estimates are based on the terms set forth in the Amended and Restated Commitment Letter, dated as of November 2, 2007, by and among Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P. and Lehman Brothers Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners (the “Arrangers”) and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P. and Lehman Brothers Commercial Paper Inc. as the initial lenders (the “Initial Lenders” and together with the Arrangers, the “Commitment Parties”) and Aldabra Sub LLC and the final pricing terms agreed to with the Arrangers and announced by the Company on February 20, 2008. If we cannot service or refinance our indebtedness, we may have to take actions such as selling assets, seeking additional equity or reducing or delaying capital expenditures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
A default under Aldabra’s indebtedness may have a material adverse effect on its businessposition.General economic conditions adversely affect the demand and financial condition.
Inproduction of consumer goods, employment levels, the eventavailability and cost of a default under our new credit, facilities,and ultimately, the lenders generally would be able to declare all of such indebtedness, together with interest, to be due and payable. In addition, borrowings under the new credit facilities are secured by first- and second-priority liens, as applicable, on allprofitability of our assetsbusiness. High unemployment rates, lower family income, lower corporate earnings, lower business investment, and our subsidiaries’ assets (which include BPP assets), and in the event of a default under those facilities, the lenders generally would be entitled to seize the collateral. Moreover, upon the occurrence of an event of default, the commitment of the lenders to make any further loans would be terminated. Accordingly, a default under any debt instrument, unless cured or waived, would likely have a material adverse effect on our overall business, the results of our operations and our financial condition.
11

Aldabra’s loan commitments could expire before Aldabra is able to consummate the Acquisition.
Aldabra Sub LLC entered into a commitment letter with the Commitment Parties with respect to a $250 million senior secured Tranche A term loan facility, a $475 million senior secured Tranche B term loan facility, a $250 million senior secured revolving credit facility and a $200 million (which amount may be increased up to $260.7 million) senior secured second lien term loan facility, to provide financing for the Acquisition. This commitment is subject to the lack of a material change in our financial condition and the financial condition of BPP, legal requirements such as the granting of security interests for the benefit of the lenders, and other matters that are in addition to the conditions under the purchase agreement. Accordingly, while we believe that we will satisfy such conditions, there can be no assurance that we will and thereby obtain the funding contemplated by such commitment letter. While the lenders have informed us that they have priced and syndicated the debt facility and closing is subject to customary documentation, this commitment has an expiration date of February 28, 2008, and it is therefore possible that the lender’s commitment could expire before the Acquisition is consummated. If such an event were to occur, we might not be able to obtain an extension of the current commitment, and we might also be unable to obtain a replacement commitment on the same or similar terms prior to the termination date of the purchase agreement (which is September 7, 2008). If the commitment had to be replaced on less favorable terms, the Acquisition could become less attractive to our stockholders, and in more extreme situations the loss of the original commitment could affect the feasibility of consummating the Acquisition.
Servicing debt could limit funds available for other purposes.
Following the Acquisition, we will use cash from operations to pay the principal and interest on our debt. These payments will limit funds available for other purposes, including expansion of our operations through acquisitions, funding future capital expenditures and the payment of dividends.
Though finalized, the terms of Aldabra’s new credit facilities are subject to market risk.
Though finalized, the terms of Aldabra’s new credit facilities are still subject to customary closing conditions. If we were not to close on this debt facility, we would need to get a replacement commitment letter from the same set of lenders or a different set of lenders. Consequently, we would be subject to adverse market conditions couldlower consumer spending typically result in higher than expected interest rates (or additional issuance fees), changes in the amortization schedule, restructuring of the facilities or subject Aldabra to covenants and restrictions thatdecreased demand for our products. These conditions are in addition to, or are more restrictive than, those currently expected.
12

Aldabra’s new credit facilities will contain restrictive covenants that will limit Aldabra’s overall liquidity and corporate activities.
The new credit facilities will impose operating and financial restrictions that will limit our ability to:
·create additional liens on our assets;
·make investments or acquisitions;
·pay dividends;
·incur additional indebtedness or enter into sale/leaseback transactions;
·sell assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries;
·enable our subsidiaries to make distributions;
·enter into transactions with our affiliates;
·enter into new lines of business; and
·engage in consolidations, mergers or sales of substantially all of our assets.
We will need to seek permission from the lenders in order to engage in certain corporate actions. The lenders’ interests may be different from ours, and no assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain the lenders’ permission when needed. This may prevent us from taking actions that are in our stockholders’ best interest.
The new credit facilities also require us to achieve specified financial and operating results and maintain compliance with specified financial ratios. Our ability to comply with these ratios may be affected by events beyond our control and these types of restrictions could:
·limit our ability to plan for, or react to, market conditions or meet capital needs or otherwise restrict our activities or business plans; and
·adversely affect our ability to finance our operations, strategic acquisitions, investments, alliances and other capital needs, or to engage in other business activities that would be in our best interest.
13

The consideration to be paid as part of the Acquisition is subject to change, and the exact consideration is not determinable at this time.
The Acquisition consideration consists of cash and stock (and under certain conditions, a subordinated promissory note) equal to $1,625,000,000 plus or minus an incremental amount equal to the sum of (i) the Paper Group’s cash and cash equivalents (expected to be $38,000,000), (ii) plus or minus the amount by which the net working capital of the paper and packaging and newsprint businesses of the Seller is greater or less than $329,000,000 (as applicable), and (iii) plus the amount (if any) by which Aldabra’s net working capital is less than $404,350,800, in each case calculated as of 11:59 p.m. (Boise, Idaho time) on the day before closing (the net amount derived from the foregoing, the “total purchase price”). The actual cash portion of the total purchase price will equal the amount of Aldabra’s cash at closing (including the aggregate amount of cash held in the trust fund account, but excluding any amounts paid upon exercise by Aldabra stockholders of conversion rights), less transaction expenses plus the amount of the net proceeds from the debt financing provided to Aldabra Sub LLC from the Initial Lenders, with the Aldabra common stock valued based on the Average Trading Price that will not be higher than $10.00 or lower than $9.54. Assuming an Average Trading Price of $9.54 and assuming a conversion rate of approximately 30%, Aldabra (i) will issue to the Seller 37,857,374 shares of Aldabra common stock, (ii) will incur indebtedness of approximately $1,066 million under the bank facility and approximately $41 million in the form of a subordinated promissory note issued by Aldabra to the Seller. In addition, the subordinated promissory note could increase or decrease based on any working capital adjustments by both the Company and BPP post-closing.
Registration rights held by the Seller and certain Aldabra stockholders may have an adverse effect on the market price of Aldabra’s common stock.
An investor rights agreement to be entered into as a condition for the completion of the Acquisition will provide for registration rights with respect to: (1) shares of Aldabra common stock acquired pursuant to the investor rights agreement (the “Aldabra Registrable Securities”); (2) the Seller Registrable Securities; and (3) shares held by other Aldabra stockholders party to the investor rights agreement (the “Other Registrable Securities”). Assuming a conversion rate of 30%, approximately 48.2 million (or approximately 62.4% of our outstanding common stock) would have registration rights.
After the consummation of the Acquisition, holders of the Seller Registrable Securities or the Aldabra Registrable Securities will have the right to demand registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), of all or a portion of their registrable securities subject to amount and time limitations. Holders of the Seller Registrable Securities may demand five long-form registrations and an unlimited number of short-form registrations, while holders of Aldabra Registrable Securities may demand two long-form registrations and an unlimited number of short-form registrations. The minimum aggregate offering value of the securities required to be registered must equal at least $25,000,000 for long-form registrations and $5,000,000 for short-form registrations.
14

Additionally, whenever (i) we propose to register any of our securities under the Securities Act (ii) and the method we select would permit the registration of registrable securities, holders of Aldabra Registrable Securities, the Seller Registrable Securities or Other Registrable Securities will have the right to request the inclusion of their registrable securities in such registration. The resale of these shares in the public market upon exercise of the registration rights described above could adversely affect the market price of our common stock or impact our ability to raise additional equity capital.
Delaware law and the proposed amended and restated charter documents may impede or discourage a takeover that Aldabra’s stockholders may consider favorable.
The provisions of our amended and restated charter that will be put into effect in connection with the Acquisition may deter, delay or prevent a third party from acquiring us. These provisions include:
·limitations on the ability of stockholders to amend our charter documents, including stockholder supermajority voting requirements;
·the inability of stockholders to act by written consent or to call special meetings after such time the Seller owns less than 25% of the voting power of our common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors;
·a classified board of directors with staggered three-year terms; and
·the authority of our board of directors to issue, without stockholder approval, up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with such terms as the board of directors may determine and to issue additional shares of our common stock.
These provisions could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control, discourage others from making tender offers for our shares, lower the market price of our stock or impede the ability of our stockholders to change our management, even if such changes would be beneficial to our stockholders.
Stockholders of Aldabra may not receive dividends because of restrictions in the new credit facilities, Delaware law and state regulatory requirements.
Our ability to pay dividends will be restricted by our new credit facilities, as well as Delaware law and state regulatory authorities. Under Delaware law, our board of directors may not authorize payment of a dividend unless it is either paid out of our capital surplus, as calculated in accordance with the DGCL, or, if we do not have a surplus, it is paid out of our net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. To the extent we do not have adequate surplus or net profits, we will be prohibited from paying dividends.
15

The post-Acquisition business may incur increased costs as a result of having publicly-traded equity securities.
We will continue to have publicly-traded equity securities following the Acquisition, and as a result, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that BPP did not incur as part of a private company with public debt. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), as well as new rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, and the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. These new rules and regulations have increased legal and financial compliance costs and made activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, as a result of having publicly-traded equity securities, we will be required to have a majority of independent directors and to create additional board committees, such as audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees. These new rules and regulations make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers.
If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in trust may be reduced, and the per share liquidation price per IPO Share received by holders could decrease.
As of December 31, 2007, the value of the trust fund was approximately $402,050,526, net of permitted accrued expenses and taxes. The proceeds deposited in the trust account could, however, become subject to the claims of Aldabra’s creditors (which could include vendors and service providers it has engaged to assist Aldabra in any way in connection with its search for a target business and that are owed money by Aldabra, as well as target businesses themselves), which could have higher priority than the claims of its public stockholders to the extent that these vendors have not signed waivers. Messrs. Leight and Weiss have personally agreed, pursuant to agreements with Aldabra and Lazard Capital Markets LLC that, if Aldabra liquidates prior to the consummation of a business combination, they will be personally liable to pay debts and obligations to target businesses or vendors or other entities that are owed money by Aldabra for services rendered or contracted for or products sold to Aldabra in excess of the net proceeds of the Offering not held in the trust account, but only if, and to the extent, the claims reduce the amounts in the trust account (not including allowable expenses up to $3,100,000). We cannot assure holders, however, that Messrs. Leight and Weiss would be able to satisfy those obligations. Furthermore, Messrs. Leight and Weiss will not have any personal liability as to any claimed amounts owed to a third party (including target businesses) that executed a waiver. If a claim were made that resulted in Messrs. Leight and Weiss having personal liability and they refused to satisfy their obligations, Aldabra would have a fiduciary obligation to bring an action against them to enforce Aldabra’s indemnification rights and would accordingly bring such an action against them.

16

Accordingly, the actual per IPO Share liquidation price could decrease due to claims of creditors. Additionally, in the case of a prospective target business that did not execute a waiver, such liability will only be in an amount necessary to ensure that holders of IPO Shares receive no less than $10.00 per share upon liquidation. Furthermore, if Aldabra is forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary bankruptcy case is filed against Aldabra that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in Aldabra’s bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of its stockholders.
Under the DGCL, stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against a corporation to the extent of distributions received by them in a dissolution. If the corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in Section 280 of the DGCL intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision for all claims against it, including a 60-day notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought against the corporation, a 90-day period during which the corporation may reject any claims brought, and an additional 150-day waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution. However, in the event of a liquidation, it is Aldabra’s intention to make liquidating distributions to its stockholders as soon as reasonably possible after June 19, 2009 and, therefore, Aldabra does not intend to comply with those procedures. As such, Aldabra’s stockholders could potentially be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received by them (but no more) and any liability of its stockholders may extend well beyond the third anniversary of such date. Because Aldabra will not be complying with Section 280, Section 281(b) of the DGCL requires Aldabra to adopt a plan that will provide for Aldabra’s payment, based on facts known to Aldabra at such time, of (i) all existing claims, (ii) all pending claims and (iii) all claims that may be potentially brought against Aldabra within the subsequent 10 years. Accordingly, Aldabra would be required to provide for any claims of creditors known to it at that time or those that it believes could be potentially brought against it within the subsequent 10 years prior to its distributing the funds in the trust account to its public stockholders. However, because Aldabra is a blank check company, rather than an operating company, and its operations will be limited to searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from Aldabra’s vendors and service providers (such as accountants, lawyers, investment bankers, etc.) and potential target businesses. All vendors, service providers and prospective target businesses are asked to execute agreements with Aldabra, waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind they may have in or to any monies held in the trust account. As a result, the claims that could be made against Aldabra will be limited, thereby lessening the likelihood that any claim would result in any liability extending to the trust. Aldabra therefore believes that any necessary provision for creditors will be reduced and should not have a significant impact on its ability to distribute the funds in the trust account to its public stockholders should a liquidation be necessary. Nevertheless, we cannot assure holdersour business, results of this fact, as there is no guarantee that vendors, service providersoperations, cash flows, and prospective target businesses will execute such agreements. Nor is there any guarantee that, even if they execute such agreements with us, they will not seek recourse against the trust account. A court could also conclude that such agreements are not legally enforceable. As a result, if Aldabra liquidates, the per-share distribution from the trust account could decrease due to claims or potential claims of creditors.
17

If Aldabra is forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary bankruptcy case is filed against the Company that is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy court could seek to recover all amounts received by Aldabra’s stockholders. Furthermore, because Aldabra intends to distribute the proceeds held in the trust account to its public stockholders promptly after June 19, 2009 (in the event of a liquidation), this result may be viewed or interpreted as giving preference to Aldabra’s public stockholders over any potential creditors regarding access to, or distributions from, Aldabra’s assets. Furthermore, Aldabra’s board may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duties to its creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, and thereby exposing itself and Aldabra to claims of punitive damages by paying public stockholders from the trust account prior to addressing the claims of creditors. Aldabra cannot assure stockholders that claims will not be brought against it for these reasons.
If Aldabra fails to maintain effective systems for disclosure and internal controls over financial reporting as a result of the Acquisition, it may be unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act in a timely manner.position.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will require us to document and test the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with an established internal control framework and to report on our conclusion as to the effectiveness of the internal controls. It will also require an independent registered public accounting firm to test our internal controls over financial reporting and report on the effectiveness of such controls for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 and subsequent years. An independent registered public accounting firm will also be required to test, evaluate and report on the completeness of our assessment. It may cost us more than we expect to comply with these controls and procedure-related requirements. If we discover areas of internal controls that need improvement, we cannot be certain that any remedial measures taken will ensure that we implement and maintain adequate internal controls over financial processes and reporting in the future. Any failure to implement requirements for new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations.
18


Risks Related to BPP’s BusinessIndustry Conditions

The paper industry is cyclical. Fluctuationsexperiences cyclicality; changes in the prices of and the demand for BPP’sour products could result in smaller profit marginsmaterially affect our financial condition, results of operations, and lower sales volumes.

cash flows.Historically, economicmacroeconomic conditions and market shifts, fluctuations in industry capacity and changes in foreign currency exchange rates have created cyclical changes in prices, sales volumes, and margins for BPP’sour products. The length and magnitude of industry cycles have varied over time and by product but generally reflect changes in macroeconomic conditions and levels of industry capacity. Most of BPP’s paper products, including its cut-size office paper, containerboard, and newsprint, are commodities that are widely available from other producers. Even BPP’s non-commodity products, such as specialty and premium papers, are impacted by commodity prices since the prices of these grades is often tied to commodity prices. Commodity products have few distinguishing qualities from producer to producer, and as a result, competition for these products is based primarily on price, which is determined by supply relative to demand.
The overall levels of demand for the commodity products BPP makes and distributes, and consequently its sales and profitability, reflect fluctuations in levels of end-user demand, which depend in large part on general macroeconomic conditions in North America and regional economic conditions in BPP’s markets, as well as foreign currency exchange rates. For example, demand for BPP’s paper products fluctuates with levels of employment, the state of durable and nondurable goods industries, prevailing levels of advertising and print circulation. In recent years, particularly since 2000, demand for some grades of paper has decreased as electronic transmission and document storage alternatives become more prevalent. Newsprint demand in North America has been in decline for decades, as electronic media has increasingly displaced paper as a medium for information and communication.
Industry supply of commodity paper products is also subject to fluctuation, as changingChanging industry conditions can influence paper and packaging producers to idle or permanently close individual machines or entire mills. In addition, to avoid substantial cash costs in connection with idling or closing a mill, some producers will choose to continue to operate at a loss, sometimes even a cash loss, which could prolong weak pricing environments due to oversupply. Oversupply in these markets can also result from producers introducing new capacity in response to favorable short-term pricing trends.

Industry supply of commodity paper products is also influenced by overseas production capacity, which has grown in recent years and is expected to continue to grow. While the weakness of theA weak U.S. dollar has mitigatedtends to mitigate the levels of imports, in recent years,while a strengthening of thestrong U.S. dollar is likelytends to increase imports of commodity paper products from overseas, putting downward pressure on prices.

19

Prices for all of BPP’sour products are driven by many factors outside itsour control, and it haswe have little influence over the timing and extent of price changes, which are often volatile. Market conditions beyond BPP’sour control determine the prices for itsour commodity products, and as a result, the price for any one or more of these products may fall below BPP’sour cash production costs, requiring BPPus to either incur short-term losses on product sales or cease production at one or more of itsour manufacturing facilities. From time to time, we have taken downtime (or slowed production) at some of our mills to balance our production with the market demand for our products, and we may continue to do so in the future. Some of our competitors may also close or reduce production at their operating facilities, some of which could reopen and increase production capacity. This potential supply and demand imbalance could cause prices to fall. Therefore, BPP’s profitability with respectour ability to these products dependsachieve acceptable operating performance and margins is principally dependent on managing itsour cost structure, particularlymanaging changes in raw materials and energy prices which(which represent the largest componentsa large component of itsour operating costs and can fluctuate based upon factors beyond its control, as described below.our control), and general conditions in the paper market. If the prices of BPP’sfor our products decline or if itsour raw materials or energymaterial costs increase, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Some of our paper products are vulnerable to long-term declines in demand due to competing technologies or both, then its salesmaterials.Our uncoated freesheet papers and profitability couldnewsprint compete with electronic data transmission, document storage alternatives, and paper grades we do not produce. Increasing shifts to these alternatives have had and are likely to continue to have an adverse effect on traditional print media and paper usage. Neither the timing nor the extent of this shift can be materially and adversely affected.

predicted with certainty. Because of these trends, demand for paper products may shift from one grade of paper to another or be eliminated altogether.

BPP facesWe face strong competition in itsour markets.

The paper and packaging and newsprint industry isindustries are highly competitive, and BPP facescompetitive. We face competition from numerous competitors, domestic as well as foreign. Some of BPP’sour competitors are large, vertically integrated companies that have greater financial and other resources, greater manufacturing economies of scale, greater energy self-sufficiency, and/self-

15


sufficiency, or lower operating costs, as compared to BPP. Some of BPP’s competitors have less indebtedness than Boise Inc. will have after the Acquisition is consummated, and therefore more of their cash will be available for business purposes other than debt service. As a result, Boise Inc.with our company. We may be unable to compete with other companies in the market during the various stages of the business cycle and particularly during any downturns.

BPP’s manufacturing businesses Some of the factors that may have difficulty obtaining logsadversely affect our ability to compete in the markets in which we participate include the entry of new competitors (including foreign producers) into the markets we serve, our competitors’ pricing strategies, our failure to anticipate and respond to changing customer preferences, and our inability to maintain the cost-efficiency of our facilities.

Increases in the cost of our raw materials, including wood fiber, at favorablechemicals, and energy, could affect our profitability. We rely heavily on raw materials, including wood fiber and chemicals, and energy sources, including natural gas and electricity. Our profitability has been, and will continue to be, affected by changes in the costs and availability of such raw materials. For most of our products, the relationship between industry supply and demand, rather than changes in the cost of raw materials, determines our ability to increase prices. Consequently, we may be unable to pass increases in our operating costs on to our customers in the short term. Any sustained increase in raw material costs, coupled with our inability to increase prices, would reduce our operating margins and potentially require us to limit or at all.cease operations of one or more of our machines or facilities.

Wood fiber is BPP’sour principal raw material, accounting for approximately 29%31% and 17%18%, respectively, of the aggregate amount of materials, labor, and other operating expenses, including fiber costs, for BPP’sour Paper and Packaging & Newsprint segments respectively, in 2007.for the year ended December 31, 2010. Wood fiber is a commodity, and prices have historically been cyclical. In addition, availability of wood fiber is often negatively affected if demand for building products declines, since wood fiber, including wood chips, sawdust, and shavings, is a byproduct in the manufacture of building products. Wood fiber for BPP’s paper mills inproducts, and the Northwest comes predominantly from building products manufacturing plants. Because of the decline in the housing markets and new construction, a number of building products manufacturing plants have been curtailed and closed in the Northwest. These curtailments affect the availability and price of wood fiber in the region and, in turn, affect the operating and financial performance of BPP’s Northwest paper mills. In many cases, BPP may be unable to increase product prices in response to increased wood fiber costs depending on other factors affecting theis often negatively affected if demand or supply of paper. Further, severefor building products declines. Severe or sustained shortages of fiber could cause BPPus to curtail itsour own operations, resulting in material and adverse affectseffects on itsour sales and profitability.

20

Future domestic or foreign legislation and litigation concerning the use of timberlands, the protection of endangered species, the promotion ofand forest health and the response to, and prevention of, catastrophic wildfires can also affect log and fiber supply. Availability of harvested logs and fiber may be further limited by fire, insect infestation, disease, ice storms, windstorms, hurricanes, flooding and other natural and man-made causes, thereby reducing supply and increasing prices. In addition, since a number of BPP’s manufacturing facilities use wood-based biomass as an alternative energy source, an increase in wood fiber costs or a reduction in availability can increase the price of, or reduce the total usage of biomass, which could result in higher energy costs.
Further increases in the cost of BPP’s purchased energy or chemicals would lead to higher manufacturing costs, thereby reducing its margins.

Energy is one of BPP’s most significant costs, and it accountedaccounts for approximately 15%13% and 14%12%, respectively, of the aggregate amount of materials, labor, and other operating expenses, including fiber costs, for our Paper and Packaging segments for the Seller’s paper and packaging and newsprint segments, in 2007.year ended December 31, 2010. Energy prices, particularly for electricity and natural gas, and fuel oil, have been volatile in recent years and currently exceed historical averages.years. These fluctuations impact BPP’saffect our manufacturing costs and can contribute significantly to earnings volatility. BPP has some flexibility to switch between fuel sources; however, it has significant exposure to natural gas, fuel oil and biomass (hog fuel) price increases. Increased demand for these fuels (which could be driven by cold weather) or further supply constraints could drive prices higher. The electricity rates charged to BPP are impacted by the increase in natural gas prices, although the degree of impact depends on each utility’s mix of energy resources and the relevant regulatory situation.

Other raw materials BPP useswe use include various chemical compounds, such as starch, caustic soda, precipitated calcium carbonate, sodium chlorate, sodium hydroxidedyestuffs, and dyes.optical brighteners. Purchases of chemicals accounted for approximately 14%15% and 5%6%, respectively, of the aggregate amount of materials, labor, and other operating expenses, including fiber costs, for our Paper and Packaging segments for the Seller’s paper and packaging and newsprint segments, respectively, in 2007.year ended December 31, 2010. The costs of these chemicals have been volatile historically and are influenced by capacity utilization, energy prices, and other factors beyond our control.

Risks Related to Our Operations

We depend on OfficeMax for a significant portion of our business.Our largest customer, OfficeMax, accounted for approximately 24% of our total sales for the controlyear ended December 31, 2010. In October 2004, OfficeMax agreed to purchase, from our Predecessor, its full North American requirements for cut-size office paper, to the extent Boise chooses to supply such paper to them, through December 2012. OfficeMax’s purchase obligations under the agreement will phase out ratably over a four-year period beginning one year after the delivery of BPP.

For BPP’s products,notice of termination, but in no event will the relationship between industry supplypurchase obligation be reduced prior to December 31, 2012. If this contract is not renewed or not renewed on terms similar to the existing terms, our future business operations may be adversely affected. If OfficeMax were unable to pay, our financial performance could be affected significantly and demand, rather than changesnegatively. Any significant deterioration in the costfinancial condition of raw materials, determines BPP’s ability to increase prices. Consequently, BPP may be unable to pass increasesOfficeMax or a significant change in its operating costsbusiness that would affect its willingness to its customers in the short term. Any sustained increase in chemical or energy prices would reduce BPP’s operating margins and potentially require it to limit or cease operations of one or more of its machines or facilities.
21

Some of BPP’s paper products are vulnerable to long-term declines in demand due to competing technologies or materials.
BPP’s uncoated free sheet paper and newsprint compete with electronic transmission, document storage alternatives, and paper grades BPP does not produce. As the use of these alternatives grow, demand for paper products may shift from one grade of paper to another or be eliminated altogether. For example, demand for newsprint has declined and may continue to decline as newspapers are replaced with electronic media, and demand for BPP’s uncoated free sheet paper for use in preprinted forms has declined and may continue to decline as the use of desktop publishing and on-demand printing continues to displace traditional forms. Demand for BPP’s containerboard may decline as corrugated paper packaging may be replaced with other packaging materials. Any substantial shift in demand from BPP’s purchase our

16


products to competing technologies or materials could result inhave a material decrease in salesadverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of BPP’s products. The increase in imports also has negatively influenced demand for domestic containerboard, as more products are manufacturedoperations, and packaged offshore.

cash flows.

A material disruption at one of BPP’sour manufacturing facilities could prevent itus from meeting customer demand, reduce itsour sales, and/or negatively impact itsaffect our net income.

Any of BPP’sour manufacturing facilities, or any of BPP’sour machines within an otherwise operational facility, could cease operations unexpectedly due to a number of events, including:including the following:

Maintenance outages.

Prolonged power failures.

·maintenance outages;

Equipment failure.

·prolonged power failures;
·an equipment failure;
·disruption in the supply of raw materials, such as wood fiber, energy or chemicals;
·a chemical spill or release;
·closure because of environmental-related concerns;
·explosion of a boiler;
·the effect of a drought or reduced rainfall on BPP’s water supply;
·disruptions in the transportation infrastructure, including roads, bridges, railroad tracks, and tunnels;
·fires, floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, or other catastrophes;
·terrorism or threats of terrorism;
·labor difficulties; or
·other operational problems.
22


Future events may cause shutdowns, which may result

Disruption in downtime and/the supply of raw materials, such as wood fiber, energy, or cause damage to BPP’s facilities. chemicals.

A chemical spill or release.

Closure because of environmental-related concerns.

Explosion of a boiler.

The effect of a drought or reduced rainfall on our water supply.

Disruptions in the transportation infrastructure, including roads, bridges, railroad tracks, and tunnels.

Fires, floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, or other catastrophes.

Terrorism or threats of terrorism.

Labor difficulties.

Other operational problems.

Any such downtime or facility damage could prevent BPPus from meeting customer demand for itsour products and/or require BPPus to make unplanned capital expenditures. If BPP’sour machines or facilities were to incur significant downtime, BPP’sour ability to meet itsour production capacity targets and satisfy customer requirements would be impaired, resulting in lower sales and net income.

having a negative effect on our financial results.

BPP’s operations require substantial capital, and it may notLabor disruptions or increased labor costs could materially adversely affect our business. While we believe we have adequate capital resources to provide for all of its capital requirements.

 BPP’s manufacturing businesses are capital-intensive, and BPP regularly incurs capital expenditures to expand its operations, maintain its equipment, increase its operating efficiency and comply with environmental laws. During 2007, BPP’s total capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, were approximately $146 million, including approximately $63 million for maintenance capital (replacements) and approximately $4 million for environmental expenditures. BPP expects to spend approximately $125 million to $135 million, excluding acquisitions, on capital expenditures during 2008, including approximately $11 million related to the installation ofgood labor relations, we could experience a shoe press in the DeRidder, Louisiana mill to reduce the use of energy in producing linerboard, approximately $85 million to $95 million for maintenance capital (replacements) and approximately $1 million for environmental expenditures. Capital expenditures for BPP are expected to be between $100 million and $125 million annually over the next five years, excluding acquisitionsmaterial labor disruption, strike, or major capital expenditures.
If BPP requires funds for operating needs and capital expenditures beyond those generated from operations, it may not be able to obtain them on favorable terms, orsignificantly increased labor costs at all. In addition, debt service obligations will reduce BPP’s available cash flows. If BPP cannot maintain or upgrade its equipment as it requires or ensure environmental compliance, it could be required to cease or curtail some of its manufacturing operations or it may become unable to manufacture products that can compete effectively in one or more of its markets.
BPP’s operations are affected by its relationship with OfficeMax Incorporated (“OfficeMax”).
BPP operated asour facilities, either in the course of negotiations of a business unitlabor agreement or otherwise. Either of OfficeMax until 2004, when BPP was acquiredthese situations could prevent us from meeting customer demands or result in increased costs, thereby reducing our sales and profitability. As of January 31, 2011, we had approximately 4,100 employees. Approximately 57% of these employees worked pursuant to collective bargaining agreements. As of January 31, 2011, approximately 50% of our employees were working pursuant to collective bargaining agreements that have expired or will expire within one year, including agreements at the following facility locations: Wallula, Washington; Nampa, Idaho; DeRidder, Louisiana; Jackson, Alabama; and International Falls, Minnesota. The labor contract at our paper mill in Wallula, Washington (332 employees represented by the Seller’s parent company (the “2004 Transaction”). OfficeMax has continued to holdAssociation of Western Pulp & Paper Workers, or AWPPW) expired in March 2009 and was terminated by the AWPPW in October 2009. In February 2010, the union employees at Wallula rejected a 19.9% indirect ownership interestnew collective bargaining agreement that union leadership had recommended unanimously, and we declared an impasse in the Seller sincebargaining process and implemented the 2004 Transaction and will continue to retain an indirect ownership stake in Seller (and thus an indirect stake in BPP) post-Acquisition. The Seller also currently has an agreement in place whereby it receives or makes an additional payment to Office Max each year based on changes in paper prices. This agreement will be terminated as a resultterms of the Acquisition,last contract offer. We are currently negotiating the labor contract at our corrugated container plant in Nampa, Idaho (108 employees represented by the AWPPW), which expired on December 31, 2010. In February 2011, union employees represented by the United

17


Steelworkers at our mills in DeRidder, Louisiana (approximately 360 employees); Jackson, Alabama (approximately 400 employees); and consequently, Boise Inc. will neither receive payments from, nor make paymentsInternational Falls, Minnesota (approximately 160 employees) ratified a new master labor contract. We have 60 days to Office Max under this agreement. Pursuantnegotiate local issues. The negotiations with the remaining unions at our paper mill in International Falls began in late February 2011.

Our potential inability to reach a 2004 paper supplymutually acceptable labor contract that will remain in place after the Acquisition, OfficeMax is required to purchase its North American requirements for certain gradesat any of paper from BPP. BPP anticipates that OfficeMax will continue to be BPP’s largest customer and that it will continue to depend on OfficeMax’s distribution network for a substantial portion of BPP’s uncoated free sheet sales in the future. Any significant deterioration in OfficeMax’s financial condition or BPP’s relationship with OfficeMax, or a significant change in OfficeMax’s business strategy,our facilities could result in, OfficeMax ceasingamong other things, strikes or other work stoppages or slowdowns by the affected employees. While the company has in place contingency plans to be BPP’s customer, or failingaddress labor disturbances, we could experience disruption to satisfy its contractual obligationsour operations that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Future labor agreements could increase our costs of healthcare, retirement benefits, wages, and other employee benefits. Additionally, labor issues that affect our suppliers could also have a material adverse effect on us if those issues interfere with our ability to BPP, or simply result in lower uncoated free sheet (cut size) paper sales through OfficeMax, which in turn could reduce BPP’s sales.

23

obtain raw materials on a cost-effective and timely basis.

BPP isWe are subject to significant environmental, regulationhealth, and environmentalsafety laws and regulations, and the cost of compliance expenditures, as well as other potential environmental liabilities.

BPP iscould adversely affect our business and results of operation.We are subject to a wide range of general and industry-specific environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, particularly with respectwe may face civil or criminal fines, penalties, or enforcement actions, including orders limiting our operations or requiring corrective measures, installation of pollution control equipment, or other remedial actions.

We anticipate that governmental regulation of our operations will continue to air emissions, wastewater discharges, solidbecome more burdensome and hazardous waste management, and site remediation. BPP’s capital expenditures for environmental compliance were approximately $4 million, $7 million and $16 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and BPP expects to incur approximately $1 million in 2008. BPP expects tothat we will continue to incur significant capital and operating expenditures in order to maintain compliance with applicable environmental lawslaws. For example, on June 4, 2010, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and regulations. If BPP fails to comply with applicable environmental lawsInstitutional Boilers and regulations, it may face civil Process Heaters (aka Boiler MACT rules). The recently released Boiler MACT rules will require process modifications and/or criminal fines, penalties, or enforcement actions, including orders limiting its operations or requiring corrective measures, installation of air pollution control equipment, or other remedial actions.

As an ownercontrols on power boilers (principally our biomass-fuel-fired boilers) at our pulp and operatorpaper mills, and we are currently reviewing those rules to understand the effect they will have on our operations. The cost of real estate, BPPcompliance is likely to be significant. Our early estimates indicated compliance could result in additional capital spending of up to $90 million over a three-year period.

We may also be liable under environmental laws for cleanup and other damages, including tort liability, resulting from releases of hazardous substances on or from its properties. BPP may have liability under these laws whether or not it knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of these substances on its property, and in some cases, its liability may not be limited to the value of the property.

The purchase and sale agreement governing the 2004 Transaction contained customary representations, warranties, covenants, and indemnification rights in favor of the Seller’s parent entity (as the purchaser thereunder) and Boise White Paper, L.L.C., Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C. and Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings Corp.; therefore, after the Acquisition is consummated the Paper Group will continue to have unlimited indemnification rights against OfficeMax for certain pre-closing liabilities, including for hazardous substance releases and other environmental violations that occurred prior to the 2004 Transaction or that arose out of pre-2004 operations at the businesses, facilities, and other assets purchasedaffected by the Seller. However, OfficeMaxenactment of laws concerning climate change that regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Such laws may require buying allowances for mill GHG emissions or capital expenditures to reduce GHG emissions. Because environmental regulations are not have sufficient fundsconsistent worldwide, our capital and operating expenditures for environmental compliance may adversely affect our ability to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations when required. Furthermore, BPP is not entitledcompete.

We spent $4 million in 2010 and expect to indemnificationspend about the same amount in 2011 for liabilities incurred due to releases and violations ofcapital environmental laws occurring after the 2004 Transaction.

compliance requirements. Enactment of new environmental laws or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations might require significant additional expenditures. BPPWe may be unable to generate funds or other sources of liquidity and capital to fund unforeseen environmental liabilities or expenditures.

We recently acquired Tharco Packaging, Inc., and may engage in future acquisitions, which in each case could materially affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. In addition BPPto our recent acquisition, we may continue seeking to acquire other businesses, products, or assets. However, we may not be impactedable to find other suitable acquisition candidates, and we may not be able to complete such acquisitions on favorable terms, if carbon emission laws are enacted that require the company to installat all. Our recent acquisition and, assuming we complete them, additional equipmentacquisitions may not strengthen our competitive position or pay for existing emissions.

24

Labor disruptions or increased labor costs couldachieve our goals. Our recent acquisition and any future acquisitions may disrupt our ongoing operations, divert management from day-to-day responsibilities, increase our expenses, and adversely affect BPP’s business.
While BPP believes it has good labor relationsour business, operating results, and has established staggered labor contractsfinancial condition. Our recent

18


acquisition and future acquisitions may reduce our cash available for eachoperations and other uses. There can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively manage the integration of its five paper mills to minimize potential disruptionsour recently acquired business, or businesses we may acquire in the event of a labor dispute, itfuture, or be able to retain and motivate key personnel from those businesses. Any difficulties we encounter in the integration process could experienceincrease our expenses and have a material labor disruptionadverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Risks Related to Economic and Financial Factors

We have substantial indebtedness, and our ability to repay our debt is dependent on our ability to generate cash from operations.As of December 31, 2010, our total indebtedness was $781.8 million. Our ability to repay our indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures depends on our ability to generate cash from future operations. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other factors that are beyond our control. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt obligations, to obtain additional debt, or significantly increased labor coststo refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our operations require substantial capital, and we may not have adequate capital resources to provide for all of our capital requirements.Our businesses are capital-intensive, and we regularly incur capital expenditures to maintain our equipment, increase our operating efficiency, and comply with environmental laws. In addition, significant amounts of capital are required to modify our equipment to produce alternative or additional products or to make significant improvements in the characteristics of our current products. During the year ended December 31, 2010, our total capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, were $111.6 million. We expect to spend between $115 million and $125 million on capital investments during 2011.

If we require funds for operating needs and capital expenditures beyond those generated from operations, we may not be able to obtain them on favorable terms or at all. In addition, our debt service obligations will reduce our available cash flows. If we cannot maintain or upgrade our equipment as necessary for our continued operations or as needed to ensure environmental compliance, we could be required to cease or curtail some of our manufacturing operations or we may become unable to manufacture products that can compete effectively in one or more of our markets.

Our indebtedness imposes restrictive covenants on us, and a default under our debt agreements could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.Our credit facilities require BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (Holdings) and its subsidiaries to maintain specified financial ratios and to satisfy certain financial tests. These tests include, in the case of our credit facilities, eithera total leverage ratio, a secured leverage ratio, and a minimum interest coverage ratio. In addition, our credit facilities restrict, and the indenture governing the 9% and 8% senior notes restrict, among other things, the ability of Holdings and its subsidiaries to create additional liens on assets, make investments or acquisitions, pay dividends, incur additional indebtedness, sell assets including capital stock of subsidiaries, make capital expenditures, place restrictions on the ability of such subsidiaries to make distributions, enter into transactions with our affiliates, enter into new lines of business, and engage in consolidations, mergers, or sales of substantially all of our assets. We will need to seek permission from the lenders under our indebtedness to engage in specified corporate actions. The lenders’ interests may be different from our interests, and no assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain the lenders’ permission when needed.

Various risks, uncertainties, and events beyond our control could affect our ability to comply with these covenants. Failure to comply with these covenants (or similar covenants contained in future financing agreements) could result in a default under the credit facilities, the indenture governing the 9% and 8% senior notes, and other agreements containing cross-default provisions, which, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and

19


results of operations. A default would permit lenders or holders to accelerate the maturity of the debt under these agreements, to foreclose upon any collateral securing the debt, and to terminate any commitments to lend. Under these circumstances, we might not have sufficient funds or other resources to satisfy all of our obligations, including the obligations of Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise Finance Company, and Boise Co-Issuer Company under the 9% and 8% senior notes. In addition, the limitations imposed by financing agreements on our ability to incur additional debt and to take other actions might significantly impair our ability to obtain other financing.

We anticipate significant future funding obligations for pension benefits. In December 2008, we enacted a freeze on our defined benefit pension plan for salaried employees (the Salaried Plan); however, we continue to maintain defined benefit pension plans for most of our union employees. Despite the freeze of the Salaried Plan, we will continue to have significant obligations for pension benefits. As of December 31, 2010, our pension assets had a market value of $356 million, compared with $302 million at December 31, 2009. Assuming a return on plan assets of 7.25% in 2011 and 2012, we estimate we will be required to contribute approximately $3 million in 2011 and approximately $32 million in 2012. The amount of required contributions will depend, among other things, on actual returns on plan assets, changes in interest rates that affect our discount rate assumptions, changes in pension funding requirement laws, and modifications to our plans. Our estimates may change materially depending upon the impact of these and other factors, and the amount of our contributions may adversely affect our cash flows, financial condition, and results of operations.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

We have no unresolved comments.

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

We own substantially all of our manufacturing facilities and substantially all of the equipment used in our facilities. Information concerning encumbrances attached to the properties described in the table below are presented in Note 11, Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K. Information concerning production capacity and the utilization of our manufacturing facilities is presented in “Part I, Item 1. Business” of this Form 10-K.

20


Following is a map of our facilities by segment as of January 31, 2011. We lease a portion of the corporate headquarters building in Boise, Idaho:

We assess our manufacturing, distribution, and other facilities needed to meet our operating requirements. Our properties have been generally well maintained and are in good operating condition. In general, our facilities have sufficient capacity and are adequate for our production and distribution requirements.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are a party to routine proceedings that arise in the course of negotiationsour business. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings or environmental claims that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity, either individually or in the aggregate.

ITEM 4.(REMOVED AND RESERVED)

21


PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is the principal market in which our common stock is traded. The following table indicates the last reported high and low closing prices of our common stock as reported by the NYSE and the cash dividends declared per common share for the periods indicated:

   Market Price   Dividends
Declared
 

Quarter

  High   Low   

2010

      

Fourth

  $  8.10    $  6.40    $0.40  

Third

   7.36     4.96       

Second

   7.40     4.91       

First

   6.13     4.60       
         

Total

      $0.40  
         

2009

      

Fourth

  $6.29    $4.71    $  

Third

   5.40     1.41       

Second

   2.47     0.51       

First

   0.75     0.24       
         

Total

      $  
         

Holders

On January 31, 2011, there were approximately ten holders of record of our common stock, one of which was Cede & Co., which is the holder of record of shares held through the Depository Trust Company.

Dividends

We paid a special cash dividend of $0.40 per common share on December 3, 2010, to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 17, 2010. The total dividend payout was approximately $32.3 million. Our ability to pay dividends continues to be restricted by our credit facilities, as amended, and by Delaware law and state regulatory authorities. Under Delaware law, our board of directors may not authorize payment of a labor agreementdividend unless it is either paid out of our capital surplus, as calculated in accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law, or otherwise. Eitherif we do not have a surplus, it is paid out of these situations could prevent BPPour net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. Under our credit facilities, as amended, a dividend may now be paid if it does not exceed our permitted restricted payment amount, which is calculated as the sum of 50% of our net income for distributions together with other amounts as specified in the amended credit facilities. To the extent we do not have adequate surplus or net profits, we will be prohibited from meeting customer demand or increase costs, thereby reducing its sales and profitability. BPP is expected to have approximately 4,700 employees after the Acquisition is consummated, and approximately 2,745, or 58%,paying dividends.

22


Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Our Equity Compensation Plan

Plan Category

  Number of Securities to
Be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants, and Rights

(a)
   Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants, and Rights
(b) (2)
   Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))

(c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by securityholders (1)

   5,407,537    $N/A     8,203,972  

Equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders

   N/A     N/A     N/A  
               

Total

   5,407,537    $N/A     8,203,972  
               

(1)We have approximately 17 million shares of the Company’s common stock reserved for issuance under the BIPP. Since the Acquisition, 13 officers, 52 other employees, and 7 nonemployee directors have received restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards under the BIPP. These awards are reflected in column (a) above.

(2)Because there is no exercise price associated with the restricted stock and restricted stock units that were awarded under the BIPP, a weighted average exercise price calculation for the restricted stock and restricted stock units cannot be made.

Issuer Purchases of these employees work pursuant to collective bargaining agreements. The agreement at BPP’s Wallula, Washington container plant expired inEquity Securities

We did not purchase any of our equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2007, andour fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the return on a $100 investment in our common stock on February 25, 2008 (the day we first meeting is scheduled in March 2008. BPP does not expect material work interruptions or increases in its costs during the course of the negotiations with its collective bargaining units. Nevertheless, if its expectations are not accurate, BPP could experience a material labor disruption or significantly increased labor costs at one or more of its facilities, any of which could prevent BPP from meeting customer demand or reduce its sales and profitability.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None.
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES.
Aldabra maintains its executive offices at c/o Terrapin Partners, LLC, 540 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10022. Terrapin Partners, LLC has agreed to provide Aldabra with administrative, technology and secretarial services, as well as the use of certain limited office space, including a conference room, at this location pursuant to a letter agreement between Aldabra and Terrapin Partners, LLC. The cost for the foregoing services to be provided to Aldabra by Terrapin 157 Partners, LLC is $7,500 per month. Aldabra believes, basedbegan trading on rents and fees for similar services in the New York City metropolitan area, thatStock Exchange) with a $100 investment also made on February 25, 2008, in the fee charged by Terrapin Partners, LLC is at least as favorable as it could have obtained from an unaffiliated person. Aldabra considers its current office space adequate for its current operations. If the Acquisition is consummated, the arrangement with Terrapin Partners, LLC will cease.
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
None.

ITEM 4.SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
None.


PART II
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
(a)Market Information
Aldabra’s common stock, unitsS&P 500 Index and warrants are traded on the American Stock Exchange (the “AMEX”) under the symbols “AII,” “AII.U” and “AII.WS,” respectively. Aldabra’s units commenced public trading on June 19, 2007, while its common stock and warrants began public trading on June 28, 2007. Prior to these dates, there was no established public trading market for Aldabra’s securities. Each Aldabra unit consists of one share of Aldabra common stock and one warrant. Each warrant, in turn, entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at any time commencing on the later of (i): the completion of a business combination; and (ii) June 19, 2008. As of June 28, 2007, holders of Aldabra units were able to separately trade the common stock and warrantsour peer group. The companies included in such units.our peer group are AbitibiBowater Inc., Domtar Corp., Glatfelter, International Paper Co., KapStone Paper & Packaging, MeadWestvaco Corp., Neenah Paper Inc., Packaging Corp. of America, Sappi Ltd., Smurfit-Stone Container Corp., Stora Enso Corp., Temple-Inland Inc., UPM-Kymmene Corp., Verso Paper Corp., and Wausau Paper Corp. Because pre- and post-bankruptcy returns are not comparable, the graph includes the returns for AbitibiBowater Inc. only through December 9, 2010, and returns for Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. only through June 30, 2010:

23


ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Except where otherwise indicated, this Selected Financial Data is provided with respect to Boise Inc., which has materially the same financial condition and results of operations as BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (BZ Intermediate) except for income taxes. Historical differences between the two entities resulted primarily from the effect of income taxes, the notes payable at Boise Inc. that were repurchased and canceled in October 2009, and the associated interest expense on those notes. The following table sets forth the range of high and low closing sale prices for the common stock, the units and the warrants,selected financial data for the periods indicated as reported on the AMEX:

  Common Stock Units Warrants 
  High Low High Low High Low 
2007:             
June 28—June 30 
$ 9.15
 $ 9.15 $ 10.55 $ 10.44 $ 1.35 $ 1.32 
July 1—September 30, 2007 $ 9.30 $ 8.98 $ 10.95 $ 10.00 $ 1.50 $ 1.04 
October 1—December 31, 2007 $ 9.87 $ 9.21 $ 13.00 $ 10.64 $ 3.23 $ 1.45 
2008:             
January l—February 8, 2008 $ 9.70 $ 9.45 $ 12.96 $ 11.65 $ 3.20 $ 2.20 

As of February 8, 2008, the closing price for each share of common stock, unit and warrant was $9.63, $12.15 and $2.55, respectively.
(b)Holders
As of February 8, 2008, there were seven holders of record of Aldabra common stock, one holder of record of Aldabra units and three holders of record of Aldabra warrants.
(c)Dividends
Since its IPO and the listing of its shares on the AMEX, Aldabra has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock to date and does not intend to pay dividends prior to the completion of the Acquisition.
27

The payment of dividends in the future will be contingent upon BPP’s revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial condition subsequent to the completion of the Acquisition, as well as any restrictions imposed by the lenders under the new credit facilities. The payment of any dividends subsequent to the Acquisition will be within the discretion of the Company’s then board of directors.
(d)Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
None.
ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The summary historical financial information of Aldabra as of December 31, 2007 was derived from the audited financial statements of Aldabra for the period of February 1, 2007 (inception) through December 31, 2007. The selected financial data below should be read in conjunction with Aldabra’s consolidated financial statements and “Aldabrathe disclosures in “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” includedand “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K (dollars in millions, except per-share data):

  Boise Inc.  Predecessor 
  Year Ended December 31  February 1
(Inception)
Through
December 31,

2007
  January 1
Through
February  21,

2008
  Year Ended December 31 
  2010 (a)  2009 (b)  2008 (c)    2007 (d)  2006 (e) 
 

Statement of income (loss) data

        

Net sales

 $2,094   $1,978   $2,071   $   $360   $2,333   $2,222  

Income from operations

  194    306    40        23    160    94  

Net income (loss)

  63    154    (46  5    23    160    93  

Net Income (loss) per common share:

        

Basic

  0.78    1.96    (0.62  0.16              

Diluted

  0.75    1.85    (0.62  0.16              
 

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) (f)

  303    396    145        24    246    210  
 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 $0.40   $   $   $   $   $   $  
 

Balance sheet data (at end of year)

        

Current assets

 $653   $586   $596   $404    $560   $572  

Property and equipment, net

  1,217    1,223    1,277         1,210    1,144  

Total assets

  1,939    1,896    1,988    408     1,846    1,759  

Current liabilities

  304    303    269    15     250    241  

Long-term debt, less current portion

  738    785    1,012               

Notes payable

          67               

Total liabilities

  1,292    1,275    1,539    175     286    278  

Stockholders’ equity

  647    621    449    233     1,560    1,481  

Included in the selected financial data above are the activities of Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. prior to the Acquisition and the operations of the acquired businesses from February 22, 2008, through December 31, 2008. The Predecessor financial data is presented for the periods prior to the Acquisition. The period of February 1 (Inception) through December 31, 2007, represents the activities of Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.

(a)Included $22.2 million of loss on extinguishment of debt.

(b)Included $5.8 million of expense associated with the restructuring of the St. Helens, Oregon, mill.

Included $5.9 million of income related to energy hedges.

Included $44.1 million of loss on extinguishment of debt for Boise Inc., or $66.8 million of loss on extinguishment of debt for BZ Intermediate, as a result of the October 2009 debt restructuring. The difference is due to the gain recognized by Boise Inc. related to the notes payable, which were held by Boise Inc.

Included $207.6 million of income as a result of alternative fuel mixture credits.

(c)Included $37.6 million of expense associated with the restructuring of the St. Helens, Oregon, mill.

24


Included $7.4 million of expense related to energy hedges.

Included $5.5 million of expense related to lost production and costs incurred as a result of Hurricanes Gustav and Ike.

Included $10.2 million related to inventory purchase accounting adjustments.

Included $19.8 million of expense related to the outage at the DeRidder, Louisiana, mill.

Included a $2.9 million gain for changes in supplemental pension plans.

(d)Included approximately $21.7 million, $19.1 million, and $1.0 million of lower depreciation and amortization expense in the Paper, Packaging, and Corporate and Other segments, respectively, as a result of discontinuing depreciation and amortization on the assets recorded as held for sale.

Included a $4.4 million gain for changes in retiree healthcare benefits.

Included $8.7 million of expense related to the impact of energy hedges.

Included $4.0 million of expense related to the start-up of the reconfigured paper machine at the Wallula, Washington, mill.

(e)Included a $3.7 million gain for changes in retiree healthcare programs.

Included $18.1 million of expense related to the impact of energy hedges.

Included $2.8 million of expense for special project costs.

Included $2.4 million of expense related to write-downs associated with the sale of the Vancouver, Washington, mill.

(f)The following table reconciles net income (loss) to EBITDA for the periods indicated (dollars in millions):

   Boise Inc.  Predecessor 
   Year Ended December 31  February 1
(Inception)
Through
December 31,

2007
  January 1
Through
February  21,

2008
  Year Ended December 31 
   2010   2009  2008    2007  2006 
 

Net income (loss)

  $63    $154   $(46 $5   $23   $160   $93  

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

        (1                    

Interest expense

   65     83    91                  

Interest income

            (2  (10      (1  (1

Income tax provision (benefit)

   45     28    (9  5    1    3    1  

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

   130     132    110            85    116  
                              

EBITDA

  $303    $396   $145   $   $24   $246   $210  
                              

EBITDA represents income (loss) before interest (interest expense, interest income, and change in fair value of interest rate derivatives), income tax provision (benefit), and depreciation, amortization, and depletion. EBITDA is the primary measure used by our chief operating decision makers to evaluate segment operating performance and to decide how to allocate resources to segments. We believe EBITDA is useful to investors because it provides a means to evaluate the operating performance of our segments and our company on an ongoing basis using criteria that are used by our internal decision makers and because it is frequently used by investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies with substantial financial leverage. We believe EBITDA is a meaningful measure because it presents a transparent view of our recurring operating performance and allows management to readily view operating trends, perform analytical comparisons, and identify strategies to improve operating performance. For example, we believe that the inclusion of items such as taxes, interest expense, and interest income distorts management’s ability to assess and view the core operating trends in our segments. EBITDA, however, is not a measure of our liquidity or financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss), income (loss) from operations, or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity. The use of EBITDA instead of net income (loss) or segment income (loss) has limitations as an analytical tool, including the inability to determine profitability; the exclusion of interest expense, interest income, change in fair value of interest rate derivatives, and associated significant cash requirements; and the exclusion of depreciation, amortization, and depletion, which represent significant and unavoidable operating costs, given the level of our indebtedness and the capital expenditures needed to maintain our businesses. Management compensates for these limitations by relying on our GAAP results. Our measures of EBITDA are not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the methods of calculation.

25


ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This discussion and analysis includes statements regarding our expectations with respect to our future performance, liquidity, and capital resources. Such statements, along with any other nonhistorical statements in the discussion, are forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Form 10-K, as well as those factors listed in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We do not assume an obligation to update any forward-looking statement. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any of the forward-looking statements in this Annual ReportForm 10-K.

Background

In this filing, unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or “Boise” refer to Boise Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (BZ Intermediate). Boise Inc. is a large, diverse United States-based manufacturer of paper and packaging products.

Our operations began on February 22, 2008, when entities controlled by Boise Cascade Holdings, L.L.C. (Boise Cascade) sold their paper and packaging assets to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. (the Acquisition). As part of the Acquisition, Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. changed its name to Boise Inc. In this Form 10-K.

Statement of Operations Data: 
February 1,
2007
(inception)
through
December 31,
2007
 
Interest income $10,421,536 
Expenses  (399,347
Net income before income taxes  10,082,189 
Provision for income taxes  (4,590,167)
Net income $5,492,022 
Net income per share basic and diluted $0.16 
Weighted average shares outstanding  34,272,754 
Balance Sheet Data:  
As of 
December 31, 2007
 
Working capital $389,518,466 
Total assets  407,612,333 
Total liabilities  14,715,486 
Common stock, subject to possible conversion  159,760,000 
Stockholders’ equity $233,136,847 
28


ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION.
Forward-Looking10-K, we use the term “Predecessor” to reference the periods before the Acquisition, including the period when our assets were operated by Boise Cascade.

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations at times refers to the combined activities of Boise Inc. and the Predecessor for the period specifically indicated, which we believe is the most useful comparison between periods. The Acquisition resulted in a new basis of accounting from those previously reported by the Predecessor. However, sales and most operating cost items are substantially consistent with those reported by the Predecessor. Finished goods inventories were revalued to estimated selling prices less costs of disposal and a reasonable profit on the disposal. Depreciation changed as a result of adjustments to the fair values of property and equipment due to our purchase price allocation. These items, along with changes in interest expense and income taxes, are explained independently where appropriate.

Since the Acquisition, we have operated and reported our results in three reportable segments: Paper, Packaging, and Corporate and Other (support services). See Note 18, Segment Information, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K for more information related to our segments.

Executive Summary

We reported $2.1 billion of sales in 2010, compared with $2.0 billion in 2009, which represented a 6% increase. Net income totaled $62.7 million in 2010, compared with $153.8 million in 2009. Excluding the special items disclosed in the table below, net income was $76.8 million, compared with $20.4 million in 2009. The increase in net income before special items was due primarily to increased net sales prices and sales volumes and, to a lesser extent, lower chemical costs in both the Paper and Packaging segments. During 2010, net selling prices of uncoated freesheet papers and segment linerboard improved $23 and $64 per short ton, compared with 2009, as we benefited from two price increases implemented during the first half of the year. As a result of strong cash flows from operations, we increased cash and cash equivalents $97.4 million to $166.8 million in 2010, compared with $69.4 million in 2009. In addition, during 2010, we reduced long-term debt $34.1 million and paid a special dividend of $0.40 per common share, or $32.3 million.

26


U.S. industry demand for uncoated freesheet paper declined during 2010, compared with 2009. According to the American Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA), as of December 2010, U.S. industry shipments were down 2.1%, compared with the same period in 2009. Year-to-date industry operating rates, measured as total uncoated freesheet paper shipments in the U.S. as a percentage of total capacity, were at 89%. Demand for commodity communication papers has been negatively affected by weak macroeconomic conditions and elevated unemployment and continues to be negatively affected by the secular shift to electronic media for communications. Despite recent demand increases, long-term demand for printing and converting products has also been negatively affected by weak macroeconomic conditions and by the decline in direct-mail advertising. Declines in demand have been mitigated by significant reductions in uncoated freesheet paper industry capacity in 2008, 2009, and 2010. Compared with prior years, U.S. uncoated freesheet paper inventories remained very low at approximately 913,000 short tons in December 2010, compared with 941,000 short tons in December 2009.

U.S. industry containerboard demand improved in 2010, compared with 2009. Industry box shipments in the U.S. increased 3.5% through December 2010, compared with the same period in 2009, and year-to-date industry operating rates through December 2010, measured as total production in the U.S. as a percentage of total capacity, were at 95%, according to AF&PA. Total U.S. containerboard inventories were 2.3 million short tons in December 2010, an increase from 2.1 million short tons in December 2009.

Packaging demand in our agriculture, food, and beverage markets, which has historically been less correlated to broad economic activity, remained stable in 2010, compared with 2009. These markets constitute just over half of our corrugated product end-use markets. Demand in our industrial markets and containerboard export markets is more closely aligned with general economic activity and showed improvement during 2010, compared with 2009.

The majority of our fiber needs in our Paper segment and nearly all of our fiber needs in our Packaging segment are supplied by wood fiber, which exhibited stable pricing on a year-to-year basis. However, fiber costs in total increased in 2010, compared with 2009, driven primarily by higher purchased pulp prices, which began to decline in early third quarter 2010. Prices for some key commodity chemicals declined, compared with the prior-year period, but increased sequentially from third quarter 2010 and have continued to increase in 2011. Prices for our fuel energy inputs declined, while electricity prices increased for 2010, compared with 2009. Total consumption of energy increased sequentially for fourth quarter 2010, compared with third quarter 2010, primarily due to higher seasonal consumption as a result of colder winter weather.

During fourth quarter 2010, we performed a scheduled annual maintenance outage at our Jackson, Alabama, pulp and paper mill. We will have our scheduled annual maintenance outage at our DeRidder, Louisiana, mill during first quarter 2011.

Looking ahead, we continue to pursue growth opportunities in our Packaging segment to improve our competitive position. We expect continued growth in our premium office, label and release, and flexible packaging papers, offsetting declining demand in commodity paper markets. In late 2010 and early 2011, we have seen indications of rising input costs, including increased prices for chemicals and energy, which we expect to persist through 2011. We continue to monitor regulatory and competitive developments across the industry, including Boiler MACT legislation, to determine potential impacts on our businesses.

27


The following table sets forth our financial results for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, and the combined year ended December 31, 2008 both before and after special items (dollars in millions, except per-share data):

  Boise Inc.  Predecessor  Combined 
  Year Ended December 31  January 1
Through
February  21,

2008
  Year Ended
December 31,

2008
 
  2010  2009  2008   

Sales

 $ 2,093.8   $ 1,978.2   $ 2,070.6   $359.9   $2,430.5  

Net income (loss)

  62.7    153.8    (45.5  22.8    (22.7

Net income (loss) per diluted share

  0.75    1.85    (0.62        

Net income excluding special items

  76.8    20.4    2.1          

Net income excluding special items per diluted share

  0.91    0.25    0.03          

EBITDA

  302.6    395.7    145.1    23.7    168.8  

EBITDA excluding special items

  325.6    232.1    222.8    24.4    247.1  

Net income excluding special items, net income excluding special items per diluted share, EBITDA, and EBITDA excluding special items are not measures under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). EBITDA represents income (loss) before interest (changes in fair value of interest rate derivatives, interest expense, and interest income), income taxes, and depreciation, amortization, and depletion. EBITDA is the primary measure used by our chief operating decision makers to evaluate segment operating performance and to decide how to allocate resources to segments. We believe EBITDA is useful to investors because it provides a means to evaluate the operating performance of our segments and our company on an ongoing basis using criteria that are used by our internal decision makers and because it is frequently used by investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies with substantial financial leverage. EBITDA excluding special items and net income (loss) excluding special items represent EBITDA and net income (loss) adjusted by eliminating items that we believe are not consistent with our ongoing operations. The Company uses these measures to focus on ongoing operations and believes they are useful to investors because these measures enable meaningful comparisons of past and present operating results.

28


The Company believes that using this information, along with their comparable GAAP measures, provides for a more complete analysis of the results of operations. The following table provides a reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA, segment income (loss) to EBITDA, and EBITDA to EBITDA excluding special items for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, and the combined year ended December 31, 2008 (dollars in millions):

   Boise Inc.  Predecessor  Combined 
   Year Ended December 31  January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
  Year Ended
December 31,
2008
 
   2010  2009  2008   

Net income (loss)

  $62.7   $153.8   $(45.5 $22.8   $(22.7

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

       (0.6  0.5        0.5  

Interest expense

   64.8    83.3    91.2        91.2  

Interest income

   (0.3  (0.4  (2.2  (0.2  (2.4

Income tax (provision) benefit

   45.4    28.0    (8.8  0.6    (8.2

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

   129.9    131.5    110.0    0.5    110.5  
                     

EBITDA

  $302.6   $395.7   $145.1   $23.7   $168.8  
                     

Paper

      

Segment income

  $151.5   $262.7   $32.7   $20.7   $53.4  

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

   87.4    85.2    71.7    0.3    72.0  
                     

EBITDA

  $238.9   $347.8   $104.3   $21.1   $125.4  
                     

Inventory revaluation expense

           7.4        7.4  

St. Helens mill restructuring

   0.2    5.8    37.6        37.6  

Change in fair value of energy hedges

   0.5    (4.8  6.1        6.0  

Alternative fuel mixture credits, net

       (149.9            
                     

EBITDA excluding special items

  $239.6   $198.9   $155.4   $21.0   $176.4  
                     

Packaging

      

Segment income

  $65.0   $67.1   $21.1   $5.7   $26.8  

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

   38.6    42.2    35.1    0.1    35.1  
                     

EBITDA

  $103.6   $109.3   $56.2   $5.7   $61.9  
                     

Inventory revaluation expense

           2.8        2.8  

Impact of DeRidder outage

           19.8    0.7    20.5  

Hurricane losses

           5.5        5.5  

Change in fair value of energy hedges

   0.1    (1.1  1.3        1.3  

Alternative fuel mixture credits, net

       (61.6            
                     

EBITDA excluding special items

  $103.7   $46.6   $85.6   $6.5   $92.1  
                     

Corporate and Other

      

Segment loss

  $(21.6 $(21.5 $(18.6 $(3.2 $(21.8

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

   3.9    4.1    3.2    0.1    3.3  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   (22.2  (44.1            
                     

EBITDA

  $(39.9 $(61.4 $(15.4 $(3.1 $(18.5
                     

Gain on changes in supplemental pension plans

           (2.9      (2.9

Alternative fuel mixture credits, net

       3.9              

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   22.2    44.1              
                     

EBITDA excluding special items

  $(17.7 $(13.4 $(18.3 $(3.1 $(21.4
                     

EBITDA

  $302.6   $395.7   $145.1   $23.7   $168.8  
                     

EBITDA excluding special items

  $  325.6   $  232.1   $  222.8   $24.4   $247.1  
                     
      

29


The following table reconciles net income (loss) to net income excluding special items and presents net income excluding special items per diluted share for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, when we had publicly traded shares outstanding (dollars and shares in millions, except per-share data):

   Year Ended December 31 
   2010  2009  2008 

Net income (loss)

  $62.7   $153.8   $(45.5

St. Helens mill restructuring

   0.2    5.8    37.6  

Change in fair value of energy hedges

   0.6    (5.9  7.4  

Alternative fuel mixture credits, net

       (207.6    

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   22.2    44.1      

Hurricane losses

           5.5  

Gain on changes in supplemental pension plans

           (2.9

Inventory revaluation expense

           10.2  

Impact of DeRidder outage

           19.8  

Tax benefit (provision) for special items (a)

   (8.9  63.3    (30.0

Reversal of income tax valuation allowances

       (33.2    
             

Net income excluding special items

  $76.8   $20.4   $2.1  
             

Weighted average common shares outstanding: diluted

   84,131    83,081    73,636  

Net income excluding special items per diluted share

  $0.91   $0.25   $0.03  

(a)Special items are tax affected in the aggregate at an assumed combined federal and state statutory rate of 38.7%.

Factors That May Affect FutureOur Operating Results

This report contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements use words such as “may,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “contemplate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “continue” and other words and terms of similar meaning. Statements that contain these words should be read carefully because they (i) discuss future expectations, (ii) contain information that could impact future

Our results of operations orand financial condition or (iii) state other “forward-looking” information. Such forward-looking statementsperformance are based oninfluenced by a variety of factors, including the beliefs of management, as well as assumptions made by,following:

Labor and information currently availablepersonnel relations.

General economic conditions, including but not limited to the Company’s management.durable and nondurable goods production, white-collar employment, electronic substitution, and relative currency values.

Included among the factors that, in the Company’s view, could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this report are the following: (i) inability to obtain the necessary debt financing; (ii) continued compliance with government regulations; (iii) legislation

Legislative or regulatory environments, requirements, or changes affecting the businesses in which BPP is engaged; (iv) paperwe are engaged.

Competing technologies that affect the demand for our products.

The commodity nature of our products and packaging and newsprint industry trends, including factors affectingtheir price movements, which are driven largely by supply and demand; (v) costdemand.

Availability and availabilityaffordability of raw materials, fiber, energy, and energy; (vi) laborchemicals.

The ability of our lenders, customers, and personnel relations; (vii) shortagessuppliers to continue to conduct their businesses.

Our customer concentration and the ability of skilled and technical labor; (viii) creditour customers to pay.

Pension funding requirements.

Credit or currency risks affecting BPP’sour revenue and profitability; (ix) changing interpretations of generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”); (x) majorprofitability.

Major equipment failure; (xi) severefailure.

Severe weather phenomena such as drought, hurricanes and fire; (xii) BPP’s customer concentration; (xiii)significant rainfall, tornadoes, and fire.

The other factors described in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Form 10-K.

30


Demand

The overall level of demand for the products we make and distribute is affected by, among other things, employment, electronic media substitution, manufacturing activity, consumer spending, and currency exchange rates. Accordingly, we believe that our financial results depend in large part on general macroeconomic conditions in North America, as well as on regional economic conditions in the geographic markets in which we operate. While extended high unemployment levels or a second economic downturn could negatively affect overall demand, no single product line drives our overall financial performance, and individual product lines are influenced by conditions in their respective industries. For example:

Historically, demand for uncoated freesheet papers correlated positively with general economic conditions; (xiv)activity. However, demand for communication paper grades, such as imaging and printing and converting papers, which we produce, has decreased as the use of electronic transmission and document storage alternatives has become more widespread and more efficient.

Demand for recycled-content papers is linked to an increased public awareness of environmental and sustainability issues and is less sensitive to general economic activity. We produce grades that contain from 10% to 100% recycled content.

Demand for our packaging products, including corrugated containers and sheets, containerboard, label and release, and flexible packaging papers, is driven by packaging demand. This demand is affected by macroeconomic conditions and is less susceptible to electronic media substitution.

A large share of the demand for corrugated containers and, therefore, containerboard is driven by unprocessed and processed food production and manufacturing, specifically the manufacture of nondurable goods. Inventory levels and currency exchange rates also affect import and export volumes and influence demand for corrugated containers.

Supply

Industry supply of paper is affected by the number of operational or idled facilities, the building of new capacity, and the shutting down of existing capacity. Capacity also tends to increase gradually over time without significant capital expenditures as manufacturers improve production efficiencies. Generally, more capacity is added or employed when supply is tight and margins are relatively high, and capacity is idled or eliminated when capacity significantly exceeds demand and margins are poor.

From 2005 to 2010, North American uncoated freesheet paper, containerboard, and newsprint capacities declined approximately 24%, 4%, and 39%, respectively, according to Resource Information Systems Inc. (RISI). New capacity additions are constrained by the high capital investment and long lead times required to plan, obtain regulatory approvals for, and build a new mill.

Industry supply of paper is also influenced by the level of imports, relative currency values, and overseas production capacity, which has grown over the past decade. According to RISI, U.S. uncoated freesheet paper imports increased in 2010, compared with 2009. U.S. exports also increased over the same time period, mitigating some of the impact of increased imports.

Operating Costs

The major costs of production are fiber, energy, chemicals, and labor. The relative size of these costs varies by segment. Given the significance of raw material and energy costs to total operating expenses and the limited poolability to control these costs, compared with other operating costs, volatility

31


in these costs can materially affect operating margins. In addition, the timing and degree of possible targets shouldprice cycles of raw materials and energy differ with respect to each type of raw material and energy used.

Fiber.    The primary raw material is wood fiber in various forms, accounting for the Acquisitionfollowing percentages of materials, labor, and other operating expenses, including related-party fiber costs, for Boise Inc. and the Predecessor for each of the periods listed below:

   Boise Inc. Predecessor  Combined
   Year Ended December 31 January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
  Year
Ended
December 31,
2008
   2010 2009 2008   

Paper

  31% 27% 29% 26%  29%

Packaging

  18% 17% 15% 17%  15%

The primary sources of logs and wood fiber are timber and byproducts of timber, such as wood chips, wood shavings, and sawdust. Substantially all fiber is acquired from outside sources. We convert logs and wood chips into pulp, which we use at our paper mills to produce paper. On an aggregate basis, operating at capacity, we are a net consumer of market pulp, producing and selling less market pulp on the open market than we purchase on the open market. The net market pulp consumed is a relatively small portion of our overall fiber needs.

Logs and wood fiber are commodities, and prices for logs and wood fiber have historically been cyclical due to changing levels of supply and demand. Log and wood fiber supply may be limited by public policy or government regulation as well as fire, insect infestation, disease, ice storms, windstorms, hurricanes, flooding, other weather conditions, and other natural and man-made causes. Residual fiber supply may be limited due to a reduction in primary manufacturing at sawmills and plywood plants. Declines in log and wood fiber supplies have been severe enough to cause the closure of numerous facilities in some of the regions in which we operate. In addition, new or proposed regulations related to the production and use of biofuel may increase the competition for wood fiber in a number of operating regions. Any sustained undersupply and resulting increase in wood fiber prices could decrease our production volumes and/or increase our operating costs. Prices for our products might not close;reflect increases or decreases in log and (xv)wood fiber prices, and as a result, our operating margins could fluctuate. Delivered-fiber costs in all of our operating regions include the cost of diesel, which increased in 2010, compared with 2009. Higher diesel costs increase the cost to harvest and transport wood to the mills, unfavorably affecting fiber costs in all of our regions.

In Minnesota, our overall fiber costs increased in 2010, compared with 2009, driven by higher prices and increased consumption of purchased pulp as a result of increased production and sales volumes. This was offset partially by lower wood fiber prices, compared with 2009.

In the Pacific Northwest, our fiber costs increased in 2010, compared with 2009, as a result of higher prices and increased consumption of purchased pulp. The increased consumption of pulp was driven both by increased production and sales volumes and by increased purchases of pulp from third parties, compared with 2009. For 2010, increased wood fiber costs also resulted from increased whole-log chipping and species mix changes.

In the South, during 2010, total fiber costs at our DeRidder mill increased overall, compared with 2009, due to higher consumption as a result of increased production and sales. In Alabama, fiber costs increased in 2010, compared with 2009, driven by increased prices for purchased pulp and recycled fiber, offset partially by lower consumption of purchased pulp and recycled fiber.

Other Raw Materials and Energy Purchasing and Pricing.    We purchase other factors listed from timeraw materials and energy used to timemanufacture our products in both the open market and through long-term contracts. These contracts are generally with regional suppliers who agree to supply all of our needs for a certain raw material or energy at a single facility. These contracts frequently contain minimum

32


purchase requirements and are for terms of various lengths. They also contain price adjustment mechanisms that take into account changes in market prices. Therefore, although our long-term contracts provide us with supplies of raw materials and energy that are more stable than open-market purchases, they may not, in many cases, alleviate fluctuations in market prices.

Our costs for raw materials are influenced by increases in energy costs. Specifically, some of our key chemicals, including pulping and bleaching chemicals consumed in our filingspaper and packaging mills, are heavily influenced by energy costs. The relationship between industry supply and demand, rather than changes in the cost of raw materials, determines our ability to increase prices. Consequently, we may be unable to pass increases in our operating costs to our customers in the short term.

Energy.    Energy prices, particularly for electricity, natural gas, and fuel oil, have been volatile in recent years. Currently, energy prices are favorable, compared with historical averages. In 2010, energy costs were higher, compared with 2009, due mainly to the SEC,increased consumption and price of electricity, offset partially by lower natural gas costs. Under normal operations, we expect to consume approximately 12 million mmBtu (millions of British thermal units) of natural gas annually. Energy costs represent the following percentages of materials, labor, and other operating expenses, including without limitation, our quarterly reports on Form 10−Qfiber costs from related parties, for Boise Inc. and our reports on Form 8−K.

Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements, which speak only asthe Predecessor in each of the dateperiods listed below:

   Boise Inc.  Predecessor  Combined
   Year Ended December 31  January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
  Year
Ended
December 31,
2008
   2010  2009  2008    

Paper

  13%  12%  16%  15%  16%

Packaging

  12%  10%  15%  14%  15%

We enter into transactions to hedge the variable cash flow risk of natural gas purchases. For more information about our energy derivative instruments, see “Disclosures of Financial Market Risks” in this report. New risksManagement’s Discussion and uncertainties arise from timeAnalysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Chemicals.    Important chemicals we use in the production of our products include starch, sodium chlorate, caustic, precipitated calcium carbonate, and dyestuffs and optical brighteners. Purchases of chemicals represent the following percentages of materials, labor, and other operating expenses, including fiber costs, for Boise Inc. and the Predecessor for each of the periods listed below:

   Boise Inc.  Predecessor  Combined
   Year Ended December 31  January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
  Year
Ended
December 31,
2008
   2010  2009  2008    

Paper

  15%  15%  15%  13%  15%

Packaging

    6%    7%    6%    6%    6%

Total chemical costs for 2010 were lower, compared with 2009, as a result of a more favorable chemical mix, which reduced consumption of some higher-cost commodity chemicals. Many of our chemicals are purchased under contracts, which provide more stability than open-market purchases. These contracts are negotiated periodically at prevailing rates.

Labor.    Labor costs tend to time,increase steadily due to inflation in healthcare and predicting these events and determining how they may affect the Company is impossible. In lightwage costs. As of January 31, 2011, we had approximately 4,100 employees. Approximately 57% of these risksemployees worked pursuant to collective bargaining agreements, and uncertainties, keep in mindapproximately 50% are working pursuant to collective bargaining agreements that the future eventshave expired or circumstances described in any of the forward-looking statements may not occur. All forward-looking statements included herein attributable to the Company or any person acting on the Company’s behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referenced in this section. Except to the extent required by applicable laws and regulations, the Company undertakes no obligations to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

29
will expire within one year.

33


Our Operating Results

The following discussion should be readtable sets forth operating results in conjunction with Aldabra’s audited financial statements from inception throughdollars and as a percentage of sales for the periodyears ended December 31, 20072010, 2009, and 2008, and the related notes, as well as its audited financial statementsPredecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008 (dollars in millions, except percent-of-sales data):

  Boise Inc.      Predecessor 
  Year Ended December 31      January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
 
  2010  2009  2008      
 

Sales

       

Trade

 $  2,058.1   $  1,935.4   $  1,990.2      $258.4  

Related parties

  35.7    42.8    80.4       101.5  
                   
  2,093.8    1,978.2    2,070.6       359.9  
                   
 

Costs and expenses

       

Materials, labor, and other operating expenses

  1,634.0    1,596.2    1,756.8       313.9  

Fiber costs from related parties

  25.3    36.9    54.6       7.7  

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

  129.9    131.5    110.0       0.5  

Selling and distribution expenses

  58.1    55.5    48.3       9.1  

General and administrative expenses

  52.3    50.3    34.2       6.6  

St. Helens mill restructuring

  0.2    5.8    29.8         

Alternative fuel mixture credits, net

      (207.6           

Other (income) expense, net

      4.0    (3.0     (1.0
                   
  1,899.8    1,672.6    2,030.7       336.8  
                   
 

Income from operations

 $194.0   $305.6   $39.9      $23.1  
                   

Sales

       

Trade

  98.3  97.8  96.1     71.8

Related parties

  1.7   2.2   3.9      28.2 
                   
  100.0  100.0  100.0     100.0
                   
 

Costs and expenses

       

Materials, labor, and other operating expenses

  78.0  80.7  84.9     87.2

Fiber costs from related parties

  1.2   1.9   2.6      2.2 

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

  6.2   6.6   5.3      0.1 

Selling and distribution expenses

  2.8   2.8   2.3      2.5 

General and administrative expenses

  2.5   2.5   1.7      1.9 

St. Helens mill restructuring

      0.3   1.4        

Alternative fuel mixture credits, net

      (10.5)           

Other (income) expense, net

      0.2   (0.1)     (0.3)
                   
  90.7  84.5  98.1     93.6
                   
 

Income from operations

  9.3  15.5  1.9     6.4
                   

34


Sales Volumes and Prices

Set forth below are our segment sales volumes and average net selling prices for our principal products for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, and the combined year ended December 31, 2008 (in thousands of short tons and dollars per short ton, except corrugated containers and sheets, which are in millions of square feet or dollars per thousands of square feet):

   Boise Inc.  Predecessor  Combined 
     Year Ended December 31    January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
  Year Ended
December 31,
2008
 
   2010   2009   2008   

Paper

        

Uncoated freesheet

   1,233     1,251     1,200(a)   236    1,436(a) 

Containerboard (medium)

   127     127     118    19    137  

Market pulp

   81     58     102(a)   20    122(a) 
                       
   1,441     1,436     1,420    275    1,695  
                       

Packaging

        

Containerboard (linerboard)

   225     253     194    36    230  

Newsprint

   231     199     326    56    382  

Corrugated containers and sheets (mmsf)

   6,735     5,963     5,337    914    6,251  

Paper

        

Uncoated freesheet

  $977    $954    $942   $868   $930  

Containerboard (medium)

   467     418     481    454    477  

Market pulp

   549     429     512    535    516  

Packaging

        

Containerboard (linerboard)

  $365    $301    $396   $399   $397  

Newsprint

   493     459     584    494    571  

Corrugated containers and sheets ($/msf)

   57     58     58    55    57  

(a)The year ended December 31, 2008, and the combined year ended December 31, 2008, included 177,000 and 206,000 short tons, respectively, of uncoated freesheet papers and 24,000 and 29,000 short tons, respectively, of market pulp from machines at the St. Helens, Oregon, paper mill that have been shut down.

Operating Results

The following presents a discussion of sales and costs for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with the year ended December 31, 2009, and for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared with the combined year ended December 31, 2008. The combined year ended December 31, 2008, represents the results of Boise Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, and the results of the Predecessor for the period of January 1 through February 1, 2007 (date21, 2008. See “Background” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of inception)Financial Condition and Results of Operations for more information related to February 28, 2007,the Acquisition.

Year Ended December 31, 2010, Compared With the Year Ended December 31, 2009

Sales

For the year ended December 31, 2010, total sales increased $115.6 million, or 6%, to $2,093.8 million from $1,978.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase was driven primarily by increased sales prices in both the Paper and Packaging segments and, to a lesser extent, by increased sales volumes in the notes thereto.

Packaging segment.

35


Overview

WePaper.    Sales increased $38.3 million, or 3%, to $1,458.3 million from $1,420.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase was driven primarily by increased sales prices across the majority of our products. Overall uncoated freesheet net sales prices increased 2%, compared with the same period in 2009, as commodity uncoated freesheet net sales prices increased 2% and premium and specialty net sales prices increased 3%, compared with the prior year. Overall uncoated freesheet sales volumes were formed on February 1, 2007down 1%, compared with the prior year, driven by a 7% decline in sales volumes of commodity grades, offset by a 10% increase in sales volumes of premium and specialty grades. Increased premium and specialty sales volumes were driven primarily by 13% growth in combined sales volumes of premium office, label and release, and flexible packaging papers, which represented 31% of our total 2010 uncoated freesheet sales volumes.

Packaging.    Sales increased $83.5 million, or 14%, to serve$671.9 million from $588.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase was driven by a 21% increase in segment linerboard net selling prices, a 7% increase in newsprint net selling prices coupled with a 16% increase in sales volumes, and a 13% increase in sales volumes of corrugated containers and sheets. The increase in corrugated containers and sheets was due to improved market conditions and increased sheet sales volumes from our sheet feeder plant in Texas. Corrugated products net sales price decreased 2%, as a vehicleresult of an increased sales mix of lower-priced corrugated sheets relative to effectcontainers due to strong corrugated sheet demand. Partially offsetting these factors were 11% lower sales volumes of segment linerboard, driven by increased corrugated sheet sales volumes, which consumed more linerboard and resulted in a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition orsmaller proportion of linerboard available for sale to third parties.

Costs and Expenses

Materials, labor, and other similar business combinationoperating expenses, including the cost of fiber from related parties, increased $26.2 million to $1,659.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with an operating business. We intend$1,633.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase was driven primarily by higher fiber and energy costs, compared with 2009.

Fiber, energy, and chemical costs were $461.8 million, $211.7 million, and $204.9 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010, and $401.1 million, $188.9 million, and $210.3 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009. This represents a cost increase of $78.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with 2009. This increase was driven primarily by increased costs for fiber as a result of higher purchased pulp and recycled fiber prices and increased wood consumption. Increased consumption of fiber was driven primarily by higher production volumes. These costs were offset partially by lower prices for chemicals.

Fiber costs increased $48.0 million in our Paper segment and $12.8 million in our Packaging segment, compared with 2009, due primarily to utilize cash derived fromincreased purchased pulp prices, increased recycled fiber prices, and increased fiber consumption as a result of increased production volumes.

Compared with 2009, energy costs increased $8.3 million in our Paper segment and $14.5 million in our Packaging segment, due primarily to higher electrical rates in our Packaging segment and increased consumption in both our Packaging and Paper segments as a result of increased production. This was offset partially by lower natural gas prices.

Chemical costs decreased $2.0 million in our Paper segment and $3.4 million in our Packaging segment, compared with 2009, as a result of a more favorable chemical mix, which reduced consumption of some higher-cost commodity chemicals.

Selling and distribution expenses increased $2.6 million to $58.1 million for the proceedsyear ended December 31, 2010, compared with $55.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. As a percentage of sales, selling and distribution expenses remained flat at 2.8%, compared with the prior year.

36


General and administrative expenses increased $2.0 million to $52.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with $50.3 million for year ended December 31, 2009. While total general and administrative expenses increased, the costs remained flat as a percentage of sales, compared with the prior year.

St. Helens mill restructuring.    The year ended December 31, 2010, included $0.2 million of costs associated with the restructuring of our recently completed public offering,St. Helens, Oregon, paper mill, compared with $5.8 million of costs for the year ended December 31, 2009. These costs are recorded in our common stock, debt or a combinationPaper segment. These costs included decommissioning and other costs related to the restructuring of cash, common stockthe mill.

Alternative fuel mixture credits.    The year ended December 31, 2009, included $207.6 million of alternative fuel mixture credits, of which $149.9 million was recorded in our Paper segment and debt,$61.6 million was recorded in effecting a business combination.

To date, Aldabra has neither engagedour Packaging segment. These amounts are net of fees and expenses and before taxes. We also recorded $3.9 million of expenses in any operations nor generated any revenues, except interest income. Aldabra’s entire activity since inception has beenour Corporate and Other segment relating to searchalternative fuel mixture credits. Eligibility for targets for a business combinationnew credits expired on December 31, 2009.

Other (income) expense.    “Other (income) expense, net” includes miscellaneous income and to consummate the Acquisition.

Results of Operations
expense items. For the period from February 1, 2007 (inception) toyear ended December 31, 2007,2010, we had net incomean immaterial amount of $5,492,022, consistingother expense, and for the year ended December 31, 2009, we had $4.0 million of interest incomeother expense that consisted primarily of $10,421,536 less operating expenses of $339,347 and provision for income taxes of $4,590,167.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We consummated our Offering of 41,400,000 units, including 5,400,000 units subject to the underwriters’ over-allotment option, on June 22, 2007. Gross proceeds from our Offering were $414,000,000. We paid a total of $16,560,000 in underwriting discounts and commissions (not including $12,420,000 that was deferred by the underwriters until completion of a business combination with an operating business and incurred approximately $640,000 for other costs and expenses related to the Offering andidling of our D2 newsprint machine at our DeRidder mill.

Income From Operations

Income from operations for the over-allotment option. After deductingyear ended December 31, 2010, decreased $111.6 million to $194.0 million, compared with $305.6 million for the underwriting discounts and commissions andyear ended December 31, 2009. This decrease was driven primarily by $207.6 million of income from alternative fuel mixture credits recognized for the Offering expenses,year ended December 31, 2009. Excluding the total net proceeds (including $3,000,000$207.6 million of income from the sale of the Insider Warrants) to usalternative fuel mixture credits, income from the Offering were approximately $399,800,000, and an amount of $399,500,000 was deposited into a trust account (the “Trust Account”), which is to be invested in United States “government securities” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, having a maturity of 180 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940 until the earlier of (i) the consummation of the Company’s first business combination and (ii) liquidation of the Company. We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds of the Offering to acquire a target business, including identifying and evaluating prospective acquisition candidates, selecting the target business, and structuring, negotiating and consummating the business combination.

30

We may need to raise additional funds through a private offering of debt or equity securities if such funds are required to consummate a business combination that is presented to us. We would only consummate such a financing simultaneouslyoperations increased $96.0 million, compared with the consummationprior-year period. This increase was due primarily to overall increased net sales prices and sales volumes and, to a lesser extent, lower chemical costs in both the Paper and Packaging segments. These increases were offset partially by increased fiber and energy costs. Our operating segment results are discussed below. Income from operations also includes net costs from our Corporate and Other segment.

Paper.    Segment income from operations decreased $111.2 million to $151.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with $262.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This decrease was driven primarily by $149.9 million of income from alternative fuel mixture credits recognized for the year ended December 31, 2009. Excluding the $149.9 million of income from alternative fuel mixture credits, income from operations increased $38.8 million, compared with the prior-year period. This increase was due primarily to increased net sales prices across all major product categories and, to a business combination. As described below, we have entered into financing commitmentslesser extent, lower chemical prices. These increases were offset partially by increased fiber costs due to increased purchased pulp and recycled fiber costs.

Packaging.    Segment income from operations decreased $2.1 million to $65.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with respect$67.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Segment income for the year ended December 31, 2009, included $61.6 million of income from alternative fuel mixture credits. Excluding the $61.6 million of income from alternative fuel mixture credits, income from operations increased $59.5 million, compared with the prior-year period. This increase was due primarily to the consummation of the Acquisition.

Commencing on June 19, 2007increased net sales prices for linerboard and ending upon the consummation ofnewsprint along with increased sales volumes for newsprint and corrugated products and, to a business combination or our liquidation, we began incurring a fee from Terrapin Partners, LLC, an affiliate of Nathan Leight, our chairman of the board, and Jason Weiss, our Chief Executive Officer, of $7,500 per month for certain administrative, technology and secretarial services,lesser extent, lower chemical prices. This increase was offset partially by increased energy costs, as well as additional maintenance costs as a result of a more extensive outage at DeRidder in first quarter 2010, compared with 2009.

37


Other

Loss on extinguishment of debt.    For the useyear ended December 31, 2010, loss on extinguishment of certain limited office space, including a conference room, in New York City. In addition, in February and June 2007, Messrs. Leight and Weiss advanced an aggregatedebt was $22.2 million. This amount consists primarily of $137,000 to uspreviously unamortized deferred financing costs for payment on our behalf of Offering expenses. These loans were repaid following our Offering from the proceeds of the Offering.

We engaged Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Financial Advisors, Inc. (“Houlihan Lokey”), pursuant to a letter agreement, dated as of July 27, 2007, to render an opinion to our board of directors with respect to whether (i) the consideration to be paid by Aldabra in the Acquisition is fair to Aldabra from a financial point of view, and (ii) the fair market value of BPP is at least equal to 80% of the net assets of Aldabra. Houlihan Lokey’s opinion, which was rendered to our board of directors, stated that, as of September 6, 2007, (i) the consideration to be paid by Aldabra in the Acquisition is fair to Aldabra from a financial point of view, and (ii) the fair market value of BPP is at least equal to 80% of the net assets of Aldabra. Under the terms of the letter agreement, Houlihan Lokey received a fee for its services, a portion of which was paid upon the execution of the engagement letter with Houlihan Lokey, with the remainder paid on the delivery of Houlihan Lokey’s opinion. No portion of the fee is contingent upon the consummation of the Acquisition or the conclusions set forth in Houlihan Lokey’s opinion. Aldabra also agreed to indemnify Houlihan Lokey and certain related parties for certain liabilities and to reimburse Houlihan Lokey for certain expenses arising out of its engagement.
In addition, Aldabra engaged Pali Capital, Inc. and Lazard Freres & Co. LLC to provide advisory services to Aldabra in connection with its negotiation of the terms of the proposed Acquisition. While such advisors agreed to provide their services without compensation, Aldabra agreed to reimburse such advisors for expenses incurred in connection with their engagement and to indemnify such advisors with respect to losses and claims arising out of such engagement. Pali Capital, Inc. and Lazard Capital Markets LLC were two of the underwriters for the Offering.
On October 18, 2007, Aldabra Sub LLC entered into a commitment letter with Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P. with respect to (i) a $250 million senior secured first lien Tranche A term loan facility, (ii) a $475 million senior secured first lien Tranche B term loan facility, (iii) a $250 million senior secured first lien revolving credit facility and (iv) a $200 million (which amount may be increased up to $260.7 million) senior secured second lien term loan facility, to provide financing forwhich was paid off as part of our March 2010 debt refinancing. For the Acquisition. With respect to these loan facilities, on November 2, 2007, Aldabra Sub LLC entered into an amended and restated commitment letter with Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P. and Lehman Brothers Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P. and Lehman Brothers Commercial Paper Inc. as the initial lenders. This commitment is subject to the lack of a material change in the Company’s financial condition and the financial condition of BPP, legal requirements (such as the granting of security interests for the benefit of the lenders) and other matters that are in addition to the conditions under the purchase agreement. The loan facilities are subject to the execution of definitive documentation.
31

On February 20, 2008, the Company announced that Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P. and Lehman Brothers Inc. had priced and syndicated these loan facilities as follows:
·a $250 million senior secured first lien revolving credit facility and a $250 million senior secured first lien Tranche A term loan facility priced at LIBOR plus 325 basis points, with a term of five years and a closing fee of approximately 2%;
·a $475 million senior secured first lien Tranche B term loan facility priced at LIBOR (with a floor of 4.00%) plus 350 basis points, with a term of six years and a closing fee of 5%; and
·a $260.7 million senior secured second lien term loan facility priced at LIBOR (with a floor of 5.5%) plus 700 basis points, with a term of seven years and a closing fee of 10%.
The “Use of Proceeds” section of Aldabra's prospectus, filed with the SEC on June 20, 2007 in connection with Aldabra’s IPO, provided Aldabra’s estimate and projected allocation of how the $3,300,000 in net proceeds held outside the trust account and amounts available from interest income earned on the trust account would be used prior to the consummation of a business combination in connection with Aldabra’s operations, search for a potential business combination target and SEC reporting. Throughyear ended December 31, 2007, we spent approximately $2,681,3272009, loss on extinguishment of the funds reserved for these purposes. However,debt was $44.1 million as a result of the complexityOctober 2009 debt restructuring. For the year ended December 31, 2009, BZ Intermediate loss on extinguishment of debt was $66.8 million as a result of excluding the gain on the repurchase of the notes payable, which was held by, and therefore recognized by, Boise Inc. as part of the October 2009 debt restructuring.

Interest expense.    For the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, interest expense was $64.8 million and $83.3 million, respectively, which includes interest on our debt obligations as well as the amortization of deferred financing costs and other. Interest expense decreased period over period due to our reduced principal balances. Interest expense for BZ Intermediate was $74.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This amount does not include the gain on repurchase of Boise Inc.’s notes payable, which were recognized by Boise Inc.

Income taxes.    For the year ended December 31, 2010, Boise Inc. recorded $45.4million of income tax expense, and Boise Inc.’s effective tax rate was 42.0%. For the year ended December 31, 2009, Boise Inc. recorded $28.0 million of income tax expense and had an effective tax rate of 15.4%. In the prior year, Boise Inc. released valuation allowances recorded during 2008 because Boise Inc. expected to be able to utilize deferred tax assets to offset deferred tax liabilities. This resulted in a lower effective tax rate during 2009, relative to 2010.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, BZ Intermediate recorded $44.5 million of income tax expense and had an effective tax rate of 41.2%. For the year ended December 31, 2009, BZ Intermediate recorded $20.4 million of income tax expense and had an effective tax rate of 12.1%. In the prior year, BZ Intermediate released valuation allowances recorded during 2008 because BZ Intermediate expected to be able to utilize deferred tax assets to offset deferred tax liabilities. This resulted in a lower effective tax rate during 2009, relative to 2010.

Year Ended December 31, 2009, Compared With the Combined Year Ended December 31, 2008

Management believes this combined presentation of the Boise Inc. and Predecessor statement of operations is the most useful comparison between periods. The Acquisition resulted in a new basis of accounting from that previously reported by the Predecessor. However, sales and most operating cost items are substantially consistent with those reflected by the Predecessor. Some inventories were revalued in accordance with purchase accounting rules. Depreciation changed as a result of adjustments to the fair values of property and equipment due to our purchase price allocation. These items, along with changes in interest expense and income taxes, are explained independently where appropriate.

Sales

For the year ended December 31, 2009, total sales decreased $452.4 million, or 19%, to $1,978.2 million from $2,430.6 million for the combined year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was driven primarily by a 14% decrease in Paper segment sales due to lower sales volumes, offset partially by higher sales prices, and a 28% decline in Packaging segment sales due primarily to lower sales volumes and prices.

Paper.    Sales decreased $237.2 million, or 14%, to $1,420.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $1,657.2 million for the combined year ended December 31, 2008. This decrease was driven primarily by a 13% decline in uncoated freesheet paper sales volumes, due primarily to lower production capacity as a result of the St. Helens mill restructuring and to market

38


downtime as a result of declining demand. Sales volumes for uncoated freesheet paper commodity grades declined 10%, and premium and specialty grades declined 19%, compared with 2008, driven primarily by sharp reductions in printing and converting sales volumes. Sales volumes in our label and release, flexible packaging, and premium office grades grew 4%, compared with 2008, as we continued to convert commodity production to label and release at our Wallula, Washington, mill. Reduced volumes were offset partially by higher prices. Overall uncoated freesheet paper net sales prices increased 3%, compared with 2008, as both commodity and premium and specialty uncoated freesheet paper net sales prices increased.

Packaging.    Sales decreased $228.8 million, or 28%, to $588.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $817.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was driven by lower sales volumes for newsprint and corrugated products and lower net sales prices for newsprint and linerboard, offset partially by higher segment linerboard sales volumes and higher corrugated products sales prices. Sales volumes for newsprint declined 48% and for corrugated container and sheets declined 5%, while segment linerboard sales volumes increased 10%, compared with 2008. Net sales prices for segment linerboard declined 24%, newsprint net sales prices declined 20%, and corrugated products net sales prices increased 2% over the same time period. Demand for linerboard was weak early in 2009 but improved later in the year, particularly in export markets. Newsprint experienced a significant decline in demand during 2009, resulting in market downtime during the period to match production with demand. In April 2009, we indefinitely idled our D2 newsprint machine in DeRidder, Louisiana.

Costs and Expenses

Materials, labor, and other operating expenses, including the cost of fiber from related parties, decreased $499.9 million, or 23%, to $1,633.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $2,133.0 million for the combined year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was driven primarily by lower prices and lower consumption of inputs and by fixed cost reductions as a result of the St. Helens mill restructuring and the idling of our D2 newsprint machine.

Fiber, energy, and chemical costs were $401.1 million, $188.9 million, and $210.3 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009, and $530.0 million, $340.2 million, and $262.6 million, respectively, for the combined year ended December 31, 2008. Combined, this represents a cost decrease of $332.5 million in 2009, compared with 2008. This decrease was driven primarily by lower prices for energy, fiber, and chemicals and reduced consumption of inputs due to lower production volumes.

Fiber costs decreased $100.9 million in our Paper segment and $28.0 million in our Packaging segment, compared with the combined year ended December 31, 2008, due primarily to lower prices for wood, purchased pulp, and recycled fiber and reduced overall consumption of fiber.

Compared with the combined year ended December 31, 2008, energy costs decreased $96.4 million in our Paper segment and $54.8 million in our Packaging segment, driven by lower prices for fuel and electricity and reduced consumption of energy.

Chemical costs decreased $40.7 million in our Paper segment and $11.6 million in our Packaging segment, compared with the combined year ended December 31, 2008, due primarily to lower consumption and lower prices for chemical inputs.

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion was $131.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, and $110.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The year ended December 31, 2008, included depreciation, amortization, and depletion for the period of February 22, 2008, through December 31, 2008. For the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, depreciation, amortization, and depletion was $0.5 million due to the suspension of depreciation for the assets being held for sale as a result of the Acquisition.

39


Selling and distribution expenses decreased $1.9 million, or 3%, to $55.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $57.4 million for the combined year ended December 31, 2008. As a percentage of sales, selling and distribution expenses increased to 2.8% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared with 2.4% for the combined year ended December 31, 2008, as these expenses declined less than sales.

General and administrative expenses increased $9.4 million, or 23%, to $50.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $40.9 million for the combined year ended December 31, 2008. As a percentage of sales, general and administrative expenses increased to 2.5% for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared with 1.7% for the combined year ended December 31, 2008, due primarily to increased employee compensation costs. Short-term incentive compensation was suspended for 2008.

St. Helens mill restructuring.    The years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, include $5.8 million and $37.6 million, respectively, of costs associated with the restructuring of our St. Helens, Oregon, paper mill. For 2008, $28.8 million of the costs related to noncash expenses. These costs are recorded in our Paper segment. The $5.8 million of costs recorded in 2009 related to decommissioning and other costs associated with the restructuring of the mill and are recorded in “St. Helens mill restructuring” in the Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss). Of the $37.6 million pretax loss recorded in 2008, $7.8 million related to the write-down of inventory and is recorded in “Materials, labor, and other operating expenses” in the Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss). We recorded the remaining $29.8 million of restructuring costs in “St. Helens mill restructuring” in the Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss). These costs included asset write-downs for plant and equipment at the St. Helens mill, employee-related severance costs, pension curtailment losses, and other miscellaneous costs related to the restructuring of the mill.

Alternative fuel mixture credits.    The year ended December 31, 2009, includes $207.6 million of alternative fuel mixture credits, of which $149.9 million is recorded in our Paper segment and $61.6 million is recorded in our Packaging segment. These amounts are net of fees and expenses and before taxes. We also recorded $3.9 million of expenses in our Corporate and Other segment relating to alternative fuel mixture credits. For more information, see “Alternative Fuel Mixture Credits” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Other (income) expense, net.    “Other (income) expense, net” includes miscellaneous income and expense items. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we had $4.0 million of expense, compared with $4.0million of income in the combined prior year. In 2009, $4.0 million of expense consisted primarily of expenses related to the idling of our D2 newsprint machine at our DeRidder mill. In 2008 the $4.0 million of income consisted primarily of a $2.9 million gain on changes in supplemental pension plans and a net gain on sales of assets of $1.0 million for the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008.

Income from operations.    Income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, increased $242.6 million to $305.6 million, compared with $63.0 million for the combined year ended December 31, 2008. This increase was driven primarily by reduced input and fixed costs, alternative fuel mixture credits for our use of renewable biomass fuels, and the restructuring of our St. Helen’s mill in late 2008. This increase was offset partially by reduced depreciation in 2008 due to the suspension of depreciation for the assets being held for sale as a result of the Acquisition, reduced volumes, and lower net sales prices in our Packaging segment. Income for the actual costs we have incurred ascombined year ended December 31, 2008, was negatively affected by approximately $20.5 million due to the DeRidder outage in the first quarter and $10.2 million due to inventory purchase price adjustments.

Paper.    Segment income increased $209.3 million, or 392%, to $262.7 million in 2009 from $53.4 million in the combined year ended December 31, 2008. The impact of the datealternative fuel

40


mixture credits was $149.9 million. The remainder of this Annual Reportincrease was due primarily to reduced input and fixed costs and the restructuring of our St. Helen’s mill in late 2008, offset partially by lower sales volumes and reduced depreciation due to the suspension of depreciation for the assets being held for sale as a result of the Acquisition. The combined year ended December 31, 2008, included $7.4 million of expense from inventory purchase accounting adjustments.

Packaging.    Segment income increased $40.3 million, or 150%, to $67.1 million in 2009 from $26.8 million in the combined year ended December 31, 2008. The impact of the alternative fuel mixture credits was $61.6 million. The remainder of this increase was due primarily to reduced input and fixed costs (offset partially by lower net sales prices and sales volumes) and reduced depreciation due to the suspension of depreciation for the assets being held for sale as a result of the Acquisition. The combined year ended December 31, 2008, included $20.5 million in costs due to the planned DeRidder outage in the first quarter and $2.8 million of expense from inventory purchase accounting adjustments.

Other

Foreign exchange gain (loss).    For the year ended December 31, 2009, foreign exchange gain was $2.6 million, compared with a $4.6 million loss for the same period in the combined year ended December 31, 2008. This gain was driven primarily by weakening of the U.S. dollar, compared with other global currencies, particularly the Canadian dollar.

Loss on Form 10-Kextinguishment of debt.    For the year ended December 31, 2009, Boise Inc.’s loss on extinguishment of debt was $44.1 million as a result of the October 2009 debt restructuring, and the loss for BZ Intermediate was $66.8 million. BZ Intermediate’s loss was greater because it did not receive the gain on repurchase of notes payable, which were held by Boise Inc. For additional information, refer to our discussion under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in connectionthis Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Interest expense.    For the year ended December 31, 2009, interest expense was $83.3 million, of which $56.9 million consisted of cash interest payments related to debt under our senior secured credit facilities. The remaining amount of interest expense consisted primarily of noncash items, including the following: $9.0 million related to notes payable and $11.3 million for amortization of deferred financing costs. For the combined year ended December 31, 2008, interest expense was $91.2 million, of which $72.1 million consisted of cash interest payments related to debt under our senior secured credit facilities. The remaining amount of interest expense consisted primarily of noncash items, including the following: $8.3 million related to notes payable and $9.3 million for amortization of deferred financing costs.

Interest income.    For the year ended December 31, 2009, interest income was $0.4 million, compared with Aldabra’s operations, search$2.4million for a potential business combination target and SEC reporting have exceeded the $3,300,000 in net proceeds held outsidecombined year ended December 31, 2008. Interest income for the trust account and amounts availableperiod prior to February 22, 2008, is attributable to income from interest income earned on trust assets held by Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.

Income taxes.    For the trust account.year ended December 31, 2009, Boise Inc. recorded $28.0 million of income tax expense and had an effective tax rate of 15.4%. Boise Inc. increased its income tax expense in 2009 as a result of its uncertain tax position regarding alternative fuel mixture credits. This excess amountincrease was offset by a $44.1 million tax benefit from the release of valuation allowances. For the year ended December 31, 2008, Boise Inc. recorded $8.8 million of income tax benefits related to losses incurred during the year and had an effective tax benefit rate of 16.2%.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, BZ Intermediate recorded $20.4 million of income tax expense and had an effective tax rate of 12.1%. BZ Intermediate increased its income tax expense in 2009 as a result of its uncertain tax position regarding alternative fuel mixture credits. This

41


increase was offset by a $45.7 million tax benefit from the release of valuation allowances. For the year ended December 31, 2008, BZ Intermediate recorded $5.8 million of income tax benefits related to losses incurred during the year and had an effective tax benefit rate of 12.3%.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During 2010, we continued to improve our liquidity position. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $177.5 million and $79.4 million, respectively, of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments and $781.8 million and $815.9 million of debt, respectively. In 2010, we generated higher operating cash flows from increased sales prices in both the Paper and Packaging segments and, to a lesser extent, increased sales volumes in the Packaging segment. During 2010, we paid a special dividend of $0.40 per common share, or $32.3 million, and we refinanced some of our variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt, which reduced our exposure to future interest rate changes. At December 31, 2010, 42.0 million warrants and 2.3 million insider warrants for which we will receive no proceeds were outstanding. The warrants expire on June 18, 2011. If all outstanding warrants were exercised at the $7.50 exercise price, we would receive cash proceeds of approximately $315 million.

At December 31, 2010, our cash was invested in high-quality, short-term investments, which we record in “Cash and cash equivalents.” The credit quality of our portfolio of short-term investments remains strong, with the majority of our cash and cash equivalents invested in money market funds that are broadly diversified in high-quality, short-duration securities, including commercial paper, certificates of deposit, U.S. government agency securities, and similar instruments.

If a contractually committed lender fails to honor its commitment under the $250.0 million Revolving Credit Facility, the other lenders would remain committed for their portion of the total facility. A total of 12 lenders participated in the revolving credit facility (the Revolving Credit Facility) at December 31, 2010, and the largest single commitment under the Revolving Credit Facility was $100.0 million. At December 31, 2010, we did not have any borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. Thus, at December 31, 2010, our aggregate liquidity from unused borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility totaled $245.4 million, net of outstanding letters of credit of $4.6 million.

We believe that our cash as well as our cash flows from operations and the available borrowing capacity under our $250.0 million Revolving Credit Facility will be paid by Aldabraadequate to provide cash as required to support our ongoing operations, property and equipment expenditures, and debt service obligations for at least the timenext 12 months.

Sources and Uses of or after the closingCash

We generate cash from sales of the Acquisition out of Aldabra’s post-Acquisition working capital.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on its financial statements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Market risk is the sensitivity of income to changes in interest rates, foreign exchanges, commodity prices, equity pricesour products and other market-driven rates or prices. To date, our efforts have been limited to organizational activitiesfrom short- and activities relating to our Offering and the identification of a target business, and if a suitable business target is not identified by us prior to the prescribed liquidation date of the Trust Fund, we may not engage in any substantive commercial business. Furthermore, we have not engaged in any hedging activities since our inception. We do not expect to engage in any hedging activities with respect to the market risk to which we are exposed.
After deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions paid (but not the deferred underwriting discounts sand commissions) and the Offering expenses, the total netlong-term borrowings, as well as from cash proceeds (including $3,000,000 from the sale of nonstrategic assets. In 2010 and 2009, we received cash from the Insider Warrants)alternative fuel mixture credits the U.S. Internal Revenue Code allowed for taxpayers using alternative fuels in the taxpayer’s trade or business. Eligibility for new credits expired on December 31, 2009. In addition to paying for ongoing operating costs, we use cash to invest in our business, repay debt, pay dividends, and meet our contractual obligations and commercial commitments. Below is a discussion of our sources and uses of cash through operating activities (including a sensitivity analysis related to our sources and uses of cash from/for operating activities), investing activities, and financing activities.

42


Operating Activities

We operate in a cyclical industry, and our operating cash flows vary accordingly. Our principal operating cash expenditures are for fiber, compensation, energy, chemicals, and interest. Operating activities provided cash in 2010, 2009, and 2008 as follows:

2010 Compared With 2009

In 2010 and 2009, our operating activities provided $289.8 million and $458.7 million of cash, respectively. Compared with 2009, the decrease in cash provided by operations relates primarily to the following:

A $91.1 million decrease in net income. As discussed under “Operating Results” above, the lower net income in 2010 was due primarily to the cessation of the alternative fuel mixture credits that we received during 2009. We recorded $207.6 million of income from alternative fuel mixture credits, including fees and expenses and before taxes during 2009. The decrease in net income during 2010 was partially offset by a $38.8 million and $59.5 million increase in income, excluding alternative fuel mixture credits in our Paper and Packaging segments, respectively.

During 2010, decreases in working capital provided $38.1 million in cash, compared with $91.6 million in 2009. Working capital is subject to cyclical operating needs, the timing of the collection of receivables, the payment of payables and expenses, and to a lesser extent, seasonal fluctuations in our operations. During 2010, the decreases in working capital primarily related to the collection of a $56.6 million receivable related to the alternative fuel mixture credits partially offset by a $17.1 million increase in inventories. The increase in inventories is primarily due to higher linerboard prices. Additionally, we had slightly higher inventory at the end of 2010, compared with the end of 2009.

More cash contributions to our pension and other postretirement benefit plans. During 2010, we contributed $25.6 million to our pension and other postretirement benefit plans, compared with $13.0 million during 2009.

2009 Compared With 2008

Unless otherwise noted, this discussion of liquidity and capital resources with respect to 2008 refers to the combined activities of Boise Inc. and the Predecessor.

In 2009 and 2008, our operating activities provided $458.7 million and $104.6 million of cash, respectively. Compared with 2008, the increase in cash provided by operations related primarily to the following:

A $176.6 million increase in net income. As discussed under “Operating Results” above, we recorded $207.6 million of income from alternative fuel mixture credits, including fees and expenses and before taxes in 2009. Also contributing to the increase in net income was increased income in our Paper segment, which increased $59.4 million, excluding the impact of the alternative fuel mixture credits. These increases were partially offset by a $44.1 million (Boise Inc.) or $66.8 million (BZ Intermediate) loss on extinguishment of debt related to the write-off of previously unamortized deferred financing costs.

During 2009, we generated $91.6 million of cash through working capital reductions, compared with using $50.5 million of cash in 2008. During 2009, the working capital reduction primarily related to decreased inventories, increased accounts payable and accrued liabilities, offset partially by increased receivables.

43


Inventories in the Paper and the Packaging segments were down $59.1 million and $23.7 million, respectively, providing $83.0 million in cash from operations as we concentrated on inventory reduction. The decline in Paper segment inventories was due in part to the liquidation of St. Helens inventory related to the mill restructuring. The annual shutdown during December 2009 at our mill in Jackson, Alabama, reduced inventory levels at year end as we sold inventory that we had on hand. Further declines in inventory within the Packaging segment resulted from operating one newsprint machine rather than the two we were operating at the end of 2008.

Higher levels of accounts payable and accrued liabilities provided $25.7 million of cash from operations. We experienced higher accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the Paper and Corporate and Other segments. These increases were offset by decreases in the Packaging segment. We had higher incentive compensation accruals at December 31, 2009, than at December 31, 2008, as we did not pay any incentive compensation related to 2008. The increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the Paper segment was due primarily to the annual mill shutdown at our Jackson mill, offset by the reduction of payables and accrued liabilities as a result of the St. Helens mill restructuring. The decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities within the Packaging segment was due in part to reconfigured newsprint operations.

Higher levels of receivables used $18.6 million of cash from operations, which is attributable primarily to an increase in “Other” receivables relating to the alternative fuel mixture credits of $56.6 million, offset partially by a $35.5 million decrease in trade receivables. The decrease in trade receivables was due primarily to lower sales within each of our operating segments.

The increase in cash provided by the items above was partially offset by more cash contributions to our pension and postretirement benefit plans in 2009. During 2009, we contributed $13.0 million to our pension and other postretirement benefit plans, compared with $2.5 million during 2008.

Sensitivity Analysis Related to Sources and Uses of Cash From/For Our Operating Activities

Sources and uses of cash flows from operating activities

Our primary source of cash is revenue generated by the sale of our packaging and paper products, including uncoated freesheet papers, linerboard, corrugated containers and sheets, and newsprint. Declines in working capital also provide cash for operations, including declines in receivables from sales of our products, reductions in inventory levels, reductions in prepaid expenses, and increases in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities.

In 2010, we sold the following:

1.2 million short tons of uncoated freesheet paper.

225,000 short tons of linerboard to third parties.

6,735 million square feet of corrugated containers and sheets.

231,000 short tons of newsprint.

81,000 short tons of market pulp.

During 2010, selling prices for linerboard (sold to third parties), newsprint, and uncoated freesheet increased 21%, 7%, and 2%, respectively, while prices for corrugated containers and sheets declined 2%. Selling prices for linerboard (sold to third parties) and newsprint improved due to strengthening demand and improved market conditions. During 2009, we took 44,000 and 225,000 short tons of market related downtime for linerboard and newsprint, respectively, while we

44


did not take any during 2010. The newsprint downtime in 2009 included the idled short tons related to the April 2009 D2 newsprint machine idling. During 2010, we took 17,000 short tons of downtime in uncoated freesheet, compared with 42,000 short tons taken during 2009.

Our primary uses of cash are for expenses related to the manufacture of packaging and paper products, including fiber, compensation, energy, and chemicals. For further information pertaining to our expenses see “Our Operating Results” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Sensitivity Analysis

Our operations can be affected by the following sensitivities, which are based on 2010 operations (dollars in millions):

Sensitivity Analysis

  Estimated
Annual Impact  on

Income
Before Taxes
 

Each $10/short ton change in the selling price of the following products (except for corrugated containers and sheets):

  

Paper

  

Uncoated freesheet

  $12  

Packaging

  

Containerboard (linerboard)

   2  

Newsprint

   2  

Corrugated containers and sheets ($1.00/msf change in price)

   7  

Interest rate (1% change in interest rate on our variable-rate debt before hedging)

   2  

Energy(a)

  

Natural gas ($1.00/mmBtu change in price)

   12  

Diesel ($0.50/gallon change in price)

   8  

Fiber (1% change in cost of fiber)

   5  

Chemicals (1% change in cost of chemicals)

   2  

(a)Based on 2010 consumption levels. The allocation between energy sources may vary during the year in order to take advantage of market conditions. The diesel sensitivity does not take into account any floors that may exist in rail or truck fuel surcharge formulas.

Investment Activities

2010

For the year ended December 31, 2010, investing activities consisted primarily of expenditures for property and equipment and purchases and maturities of short-term investments. Cash investing activities used $109.3 million, $84.5 million, and $900.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.

Cash capital expenditures for property, plant, and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2010, were $111.6 million. Cash investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010, also included $25.3 million for purchases of short-term investments and $24.7 million of maturities of short-term investments, which consisted of funds invested in certificates of deposit insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

45


Details of cash capital expenditures for property, plant, and equipment by segment for the year ended December 31, 2010, are included in the table below (dollars in millions):

   Year Ended December 31, 2010 
   Acquisition/
Expansion
   Quality/
Efficiency (a)
   Replacement,
Environmental,
and Other
   Total 

Paper

  $0.1    $18.5    $49.2    $67.8  

Packaging

   2.1     9.1     27.4     38.6  

Corporate and Other

        1.2     4.0     5.2  
                    
  $2.2    $28.8    $80.6    $    111.6  
                    

(a)Quality and efficiency projects include quality improvements, modernization, energy, and cost-saving projects.

We expect capital investments in 2011 to be between $115 million and $125 million, excluding acquisitions. This level of capital expenditures could increase or decrease as a result of a number of factors, including our financial results, future economic conditions, and our regulatory compliance requirements. Our capital spending in 2011 will be for cost savings, business improvement, quality/efficiency projects, replacement projects, and ongoing environmental compliance. Our performance improvement projects also focus on opportunities to improve our energy efficiency. We spent $4 million in 2010 and expect to spend about the same amount in 2011 for capital environmental compliance requirements.

2009

For the year ended December 31, 2009, investing activities consisted primarily of expenditures for property and equipment and purchases and maturities of short-term investments. Cash investing activities used $84.5million for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Cash capital expenditures for property, plant, and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2009, were $77.1 million. Cash investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009, also included a net amount of $10.0 million for purchases of short-term investments, which consisted of funds invested in certificates of deposit insured by the FDIC.

2008

On February 22, 2008, Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. completed the Acquisition of the Paper Group and other assets and liabilities related to the operation of the paper, packaging and newsprint, and transportation businesses of the Paper Group and part of the headquarters operations of Boise Cascade for a total purchase price of $1.7 billion, which included $1.3 billion of net cash and fees. Subsequent to the Acquisition, Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. changed its name to Boise Inc. Boise Inc. obtained $1.1 billion of financing in conjunction with the Acquisition, which is discussed below in “Financing Activities.”

For the year ended December 31, 2008, investing activities included $1.2 billion in cash spent for the Acquisition, excluding deferred financing costs, as discussed above.

Combined cash capital expenditures for property, plant, and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2008, were $100.8 million. This amount included $10.2 million spent by the Predecessor for the period of January 1, 2008, through February 21, 2008, and $90.6 million spent by us from February 22, 2008, through December 31, 2008. Of these amounts, $10.4 million related to the Offering wereinstallation of a shoe press in our DeRidder mill in March to reduce the use of energy in producing linerboard. Total capital spending for this project was $22.4 million, part of which was spent in 2007.

46


Financing Activities

Cash used for financing activities was $83.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared with $327.3 million of cash used for financing activities for the same period in 2009. Financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010, reflect $334.1 million of long-term debt repayments, $300.0 million of debt issuances, $12.0 million of cash paid for deferred financing costs, and $32.3 million for payments of a special dividend of $0.40 per common share. Financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009, reflect the issuance of $300 million of 9% Senior Notes due in 2017 obtained as a result of our debt restructuring and repayment of approximately $399,800,000,$510 million of existing debt.

Our expected debt service obligation, assuming debt and an amountinterest rates stay at December 31, 2010, levels, is estimated to be approximately $101 million for 2011 and $185 million for 2012, consisting of $399,500,000 was deposited into the Trust Account, which is maintainedcash payments for principal, interest, and fees. These amounts remain subject to change, and such changes may be material. For example, a 1% increase in interest rates would increase interest expense by Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, actingapproximately $2 million per year (based on debt levels and interest rates as trustee. As of December 31, 2007,2010). Our sensitivity to increases in interest rates decreased in 2010 as a result of paying off our variable-rate debt and exchanging variable-rate debt for fixed-rate debt.

We lease our distribution centers, as well as other property and equipment, under operating leases. These operating leases are not included in debt; however, they represent a commitment. Obligations under operating leases are shown in the balance“Contractual Obligations” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

For the Trust Account was $402,050,526, netyear ended December 31, 2008, cash financing activities were $817.7 million and reflect approximately $1.1 billion of permitted accrued expensesdebt financing obtained in conjunction with the Acquisition, offset partially by $120.2 million paid to stockholders who exercised their conversion rights, $94.3 million of deferred financing costs and taxes. As discussed inunderwriting fees, and $88.3 million of debt repayments.

For more information about our debt, see Note 1 to11, Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K.

47


Contractual Obligations

In the table below, we set forth our enforceable and legally binding obligations as of December 31, 2010. Some of the amounts included in the table are based on management’s estimates and assumptions about these obligations, including their duration, the possibility of renewal, anticipated actions by third parties, and other factors. Because these estimates and assumptions are necessarily subjective, our actual payments may vary from those reflected in the table. Purchase orders made in the ordinary course of business are excluded from the table below. Any amounts for which we are liable under purchase orders are reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as accounts payable and accrued liabilities (dollars in millions):

   Payments Due by Period 
   2011   2012-2013   2014-2015   Thereafter   Total 

Long-term debt, including current portion (a)

  $43.8    $138.0    $    $600.0    $781.8  

Interest (b)

   56.1     105.1     102.0     162.0     425.2  

Operating leases (c)

   11.7     19.3     13.8     12.8     57.6  

Purchase obligations

          

Raw materials and finished goods inventory (d)

   54.7     24.8     8.6          88.1  

Utilities (e)

   22.8     4.2     0.2          27.2  

Other

   2.9     0.4               3.3  

Other long-term liabilities reflected on our Balance Sheet (f):

          

Compensation and benefits (g)

   3.4     57.3     46.5     14.5     121.7  

Other (h)

   3.5     3.8     2.5     34.0     43.8  
                         
  $  198.9    $352.9    $173.6    $823.3    $  1,548.7  
                         

(a)The table assumes our long-term debt is held to maturity and includes the current portion of long-term debt. For more information, see Note 11, Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplemental Data” of this Form 10-K.

(b)Amounts represent estimated interest payments as of December 31, 2010, and assume our long-term debt is held to maturity.

(c)We enter into operating leases in the normal course of business. We lease our distribution centers as well as other property and equipment under operating leases. Some lease agreements provide us with the option to renew the lease or purchase the leased property. Our operating lease obligations would change if we exercised these renewal options and/or if we entered into additional operating lease agreements. For more information, see Note 7, Leases, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K.

(d)Included among our raw materials purchase obligations are contracts to purchase approximately $81 million of wood fiber. Under most of these log and fiber supply agreements, we have the right to cancel or reduce our commitments in the event of a mill curtailment or shutdown. Future purchase prices under most of these agreements are set quarterly or semiannually based on regional market prices, and the estimate is based on contract terms or first quarter 2011 pricing. Our log and fiber obligations are subject to change based on, among other things, the effect of governmental laws and regulations, our manufacturing operations not operating in the normal course of business, log and fiber availability, and the status of environmental appeals. Except for deposits required pursuant to wood supply contracts, these obligations are not recorded in our consolidated financial statements until contract payment terms take effect.

(e)We enter into utility contracts for the purchase of electricity and natural gas. We also purchase these services under utility tariffs. The contractual and tariff arrangements include multiple-year commitments and minimum annual purchase requirements. Our payment obligations were based upon prices in effect on December 31, 2010, or upon contract language, if available. Because we consume the energy in the manufacture of our products, these obligations represent the face value of the contracts, not resale value.

(f)Long-term deferred income taxes of $88.2 million are excluded from this table because the timing of their future cash outflows are uncertain.

48


(g)Amounts consist primarily of pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, including current portion of $0.4 million. Actuarially determined liabilities related to pension benefits are recorded based on estimates and assumptions. Key factors used in developing estimates of these liabilities include assumptions related to discount rates, expected return on plan assets, expected rate of compensation increases, retirement and mortality rates, expected contributions, and other factors. Changes in estimates and assumptions related to the measurement of funded status could have a material impact on the amount reported. In the table above, we allocated our pension obligations by year based on the future required minimum pension contributions, as determined by our actuaries.

(h)Includes current liabilities of $3.5 million primarily related to the current portion of workers’ compensation liability.

Off-Balance-Sheet Activities

At December  31, 2010 and 2009, we had no off-balance-sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities.

Guarantees

Note 11, Debt, and Note 19, Commitments, Guarantees, and Legal Proceedings, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K describe the nature of our guarantees, including the approximate terms of the guarantees, how the guarantees arose, the events or circumstances that would require us to perform under the guarantees, and the maximum potential undiscounted amounts of future payments we could be required to make.

Inflationary and Seasonal Influences

Our major costs of production are compensation, fiber, energy, and chemicals. Pricing for these manufacturing inputs can be subject to both macroeconomic inflationary influences and regional supply and demand. For example, fiber prices are highly dependent on regional wood supply and demand trends. Pricing for natural gas, which constitutes a significant portion of our energy costs, tends to follow macroeconomic supply and demand trends and can fluctuate based on many factors, including weather and natural gas storage levels. Many of our chemicals are specialized, and pricing may not correlate with macroeconomic trends. Pricing for our manufactured end products is dependent on industry supply and demand trends, which in turn can be influenced by macroeconomic manufacturing activity, employment levels, and consumer spending.

We experience some seasonality, based primarily on buying patterns associated with particular products. For example, the demand for our corrugated containers is influenced by changes in agricultural demand in the Pacific Northwest. In addition, seasonally cold weather increases costs, especially energy consumption, at all of our manufacturing facilities. Seasonality also affects working capital levels as described in “Seasonality” in “Part I, Item 1. Business” of this Form 10-K.

Disclosures of Financial Market Risks

We are exposed to market risks, including changes in interest rates, energy prices, and foreign currency exchange rates. We employ a variety of practices to manage these risks, including operating and financing activities and, where deemed appropriate, the use of derivative instruments. Derivative instruments are used only for risk management purposes and not for speculation or trading. Derivatives are such that a specific debt instrument, contract, or anticipated purchase determines the amount, maturity, and other specifics of the hedge. If a derivative contract is entered into, we either determine that it is an economic hedge or we designate the derivative as a cash flow or fair value hedge. We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well as our risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedged transactions. For those derivatives that are not designated as economic hedges, such as cash flow or fair value hedges, we

49


formally assess, both at the derivatives’ inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the hedged items. The ineffective portion of hedging transactions is recognized in income (loss).

We record all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The fair value of these instruments is determined by third parties. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded in either “Net income (loss)” or “Other comprehensive income (loss)” as appropriate. The gain or loss on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges is included in “Other comprehensive income (loss)” in the period in which changes in fair value occur and is reclassified to income (loss) in the period in which the hedged item affects income (loss), and any ineffectiveness is recognized currently in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). The fair value of the hedged exposure is presumed to be the market value of the hedging instrument when critical terms match. The gain or loss on derivatives designated as fair value hedges and the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are included in income (loss) in the period in which changes in fair value occur. The gain or loss on derivatives that have not been designated as hedging instruments is included in income (loss) in the period in which changes in fair value occur.

The table below provides a summary of our long-term debt obligations as of December 31, 2010. The table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For obligations with variable interest rates, the table sets forth payout amounts based on current rates and does not attempt to project future rates. Changes in market rates of interest affect the fair value of our fixed-rate debt (dollars in millions):

   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   There-
after
   December 31,
2010
 
              Total   Fair
Value
 

Debt

                

Long-term debt (a)

  $43.8    $  129.6    $8.4    $    $    $  600.0    $  781.8    $  843.6  

Fixed-rate debt payments (b)

                

9% senior notes (c)

  $    $    $    $    $    $300.0    $300.0    $337.9  

8% senior notes (c)

                            300.0     300.0     325.8  

Average interest rate (as percentage)

                            8.50     8.50       

Variable-rate debt

payments (b)

  $  43.8    $129.6    $  8.4    $    $    $    $181.8    $179.9  

Average interest rate (as percentage) (d)

   3.06     3.06     3.06                    3.06       

(a)Includes current portion.

(b)These obligations are further explained in Note 11, Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K.

(c)The table assumes that accumulated interest is paid semiannually.

(d)Does not include the effect of interest rate derivatives.

Environmental

Our businesses are subject to a wide range of general and industry-specific environmental laws and regulations. In particular, we are affected by laws and regulations covering air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid and hazardous waste management, and site remediation. Compliance with these laws and regulations is a significant factor in the operation of our businesses. We believe

50


that we have created a corporate culture of strong compliance by taking a conservative approach to environmental issues in order to assure that we are operating well within the bounds of regulatory requirements. However, we cannot assure you that we will at all times be in full compliance with environmental requirements, and we cannot assure you that we will not incur fines and penalties in the future. In all periods presented, environmental spending for fines and penalties across all of our segments was immaterial.

We incur, and we expect to incur, substantial capital and operating expenditures to comply with federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in civil or criminal fines or penalties or in enforcement actions. Our failure to comply could also result in governmental or judicial orders that stop or interrupt our operations or require us to take corrective measures, install additional pollution control equipment, or take other remedial actions. We spent $4 million in 2010 and expect to spend about the same amount in 2011 for capital environmental compliance requirements. Our estimated environmental expenditures could vary significantly depending upon the enactment of new environmental laws and regulations, including those related to greenhouse gas emissions and industrial boilers.

As an owner and operator of real estate, we may be liable under environmental laws for the cleanup of past and present spills and releases of hazardous or toxic substances on or from our properties and operations. We can be found liable under these laws if we knew of or were responsible for the presence of such substances. In some cases, this liability may exceed the value of the property itself.

On June 4, 2010, the EPA proposed National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters (aka Boiler MACT rules). The recently released Boiler MACT rules will require process modifications and/or installation of air pollution controls on power boilers (principally our biomass-fuel-fired boilers) at our pulp and paper mills, and we are currently reviewing those rules to understand the effect they will have on our operations. The cost of compliance is likely to be significant. Our early estimates indicated compliance could result in additional capital spending of up to $90 million over a three-year period.

Climate change, in its many dimensions (legislative, regulatory, market, and physical), has the potential to significantly affect our business. Boise relies on a sustainably managed supply of woody biomass as our principal raw material and main energy source. About 67% of our energy comes from renewable woody biomass. The carbon dioxide emitted when burning biomass from sustainably managed sources for energy is generally considered to be carbon neutral (does not contribute to climate change) because it is recycled in a closed loop whereby the carbon is removed from the atmosphere by the biomass and then returned to the atmosphere when the biomass is burned, resulting in no net increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Significant amounts of carbon are permanently sequestered in forests and forest products.

Our manufacturing operations emit greenhouse gases (GHGs), which may contribute to global warming and climate change. We are a voluntary member of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Climate Leaders program and the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX). Under these programs, we have established GHG emission inventories using established protocols, and in the case of the CCX, the emissions have been third-party verified. In 2009 (the last reported year), our company emitted about 2.0 million metric tonnes of GHG carbon dioxide equivalents, comprising about 0.8 million metric tonnes of direct emissions and 1.2 million metric tonnes of indirect emissions from purchased electricity. A metric tonne is 2,205 pounds. The carbon dioxide from burning biomass, which is generally considered to be carbon neutral, is excluded from our GHG inventories. In 2011, we will begin reporting GHGs for calendar year 2010 under the EPA’s mandatory regulatory program.

51


Climate change legislative and regulatory activities that affect our operations generally focus on reducing GHG emissions through some combination of GHG limitations (such as cap and trade or emission standards) and a renewable electricity standard (RES). Three of the five states in which our primary GHG emitting facilities operate (Minnesota, Oregon, and Washington) have an RES. There is currently no national RES in effect. The RES could increase our energy cost due to the higher-cost of renewable electrical generation facilities, compared with those generating electricity from fossil fuel.

The prognosis for enacting national climate change legislation into law is uncertain. The effect of any climate change legislation on our operations is also uncertain. Furthermore, U.S. legislation and regulation may put our operations at a competitive disadvantage relative to foreign competition if competing countries have not enacted commensurate GHG reduction programs.

The EPA initiated the regulation of GHGs following its “endangerment finding” in December 2009. The EPA has issued final regulations (known as the Tailoring Rule) for GHGs from stationary sources under its Clean Air Act Title V permitting and Prevention of Significant Deterioration programs in 2010. These rules are to be phased in, but they begin taking effect on January 2, 2011. Such rules could lead to longer permitting times and additional costs to reduce GHG emissions at our pulp and paper mills.

Increased interest in biomass as a renewable energy source could increase demand for and the cost of wood, our principal raw material. On the other hand, as incentives for biofuels manufacturing increase, there may be opportunities to locate biorefineries at our paper mills to produce biofuels as a coproduct. We are a significant manufacturer of recycled paper. Recycling of paper reduces greenhouse gas emissions from landfills.

There is considerable uncertainty concerning the physical risks that may be presented by climate change. Predictions range widely and can include more weather extremes (floods and drought), increased storm intensity, and rising sea levels. Climate change could also affect forests supplying our wood both positively and negatively. Increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and warmer temperatures could increase forest biomass production. Weather patterns and insects might affect forests either favorably or unfavorably. We cannot predict the effect of climate change on our operations with any degree of certainty until the legislative and regulatory landscape takes shape.

OfficeMax retained responsibility for environmental liabilities that occurred with respect to businesses, facilities, and other assets not purchased by Madison Dearborn from OfficeMax in the 2004 transaction. In addition, OfficeMax generally indemnifies our operating subsidiaries, Boise White Paper, L.L.C., and Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C., for hazardous substance releases and other environmental violations that occurred prior to the 2004 transaction at the businesses, facilities, and other assets purchased by such subsidiaries. However, OfficeMax may not have sufficient funds to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations when required, and in some cases, we may not be contractually entitled to indemnification by OfficeMax.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Critical accounting estimates are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results. These estimates require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to estimate matters that are inherently uncertain. We review the development, selection, and disclosure of our critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our board of directors. Our current critical accounting estimates are as follows:

52


Pensions

We calculate pension expense and liabilities using actuarial assumptions, including discount rates, expected return on plan assets, expected rate of compensation increases, retirement rates, mortality rates, expected contributions, and other factors. We based the assumptions used in this analysis to calculate pension expense on the following factors:

Discount Rate Assumption.    The discount rate reflects the current rate at which the pension obligations could be settled on the measurement date—December 31. The discount rate assumption was determined using a spot rate yield curve constructed to replicate Aa-graded corporate bonds. The Aa-graded bonds included in the yield curve reflect anticipated investments that would be made to match the expected monthly benefit payments over time and do not include all Aa-graded corporate bonds. The plan’s projected cash flows were duration-matched to this yield curve to develop an appropriate discount rate.

Asset Return Assumption.    The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was based on a weighted average of the expected returns for the major investment asset classes. Expected returns for the asset classes are based on long-term historical returns, inflation expectations, forecasted gross domestic product, earnings growth, and other economic factors. The weights assigned to each asset class were based on the investment strategy. The weighted average expected return on plan assets we will use in our calculation of 2011 net periodic benefit cost is 7.25%. In 2010, plan assets performed well above the long-term return assumption.

Rate of Compensation Increases.    Salaried pension benefits are frozen, so the compensation increase assumption is not applicable. Negotiated compensation increases are reflected in the projected benefit obligation for certain hourly employees with salary-related benefits.

Retirement and Mortality Rates.    These rates were developed to reflect actual and projected plan experience.

Expected Contributions.    Plan obligations and expenses are based on existing retirement plan provisions. No assumption is made for future changes to benefit provisions beyond those to which we are presently committed, for example, changes we might commit to in future labor contracts. We estimate that we will be required to contribute approximately $3 million in 2011 and approximately $32 million in 2012.

We recognize the funded status of our pension and other postretirement benefit plans on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and recognize the actuarial and experience gains and losses and the prior service costs and credits as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” in our Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for Boise Inc. or Consolidated Statements of Capital for BZ Intermediate. Actual results that differ from assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense in future periods. While we believe that the assumptions used to measure our pension obligations are reasonable, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may materially affect our pension obligations and future expense.

53


A change of 0.25% in either direction to the discount rate or the expected rate of return on plan assets would have had the following effect on 2010 and 2011 pension expense (dollars in millions). These sensitivities are specific to 2010 and 2011. The sensitivities may not be additive, so the impact of changing multiple factors simultaneously cannot be calculated by combining the individual sensitivities shown.

   Base
Expense
   Increase (Decrease)
in Pension Expense
 
    0.25 %
Increase
  0.25%
Decrease
 

2010 Expense

     

Discount rate

  $9.7    $(0.6 $0.6  

Expected rate of return on plan assets

   9.7     (0.8  0.8  

2011 Expense

     

Discount rate

  $12.6    $(1.5 $1.5  

Expected rate of return on plan assets

   12.6     (0.8  0.8  

We believe that the accounting estimate related to pensions is a critical accounting estimate because it is highly susceptible to change from period to period. As discussed above, the future effects of pension plans on our financial position and results of operations will depend on economic conditions, employee demographics, mortality rates, retirement rates, investment performance, and funding decisions, among other factors. The following table presents selected assumptions used and expected to be used in the measurement of pension expense in the following periods (dollars in millions):

  Year Ending
December 31,
2011
  Year Ended December 31 
  2010  2009 

Pension expense

 $12.6  $9.7  $8.7 

Discount rate

  5.50  6.10  6.20

Expected rate of return on plan assets

  7.25  7.25  7.25

The difference between our expected returns and our actual returns affects the amount of expense we recognize in future years. However, under pension accounting rules, this impact is recognized over time. In addition, we are required to adjust our equity in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” in our Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for Boise Inc. or Consolidated Statements of Capital for BZ Intermediate to record minimum pension liabilities under accounting rules. In 2010, we recorded a $14.5 million pretax decrease in equity. The amount of expense and minimum pension liability we recognize depends on, among other things, actual returns on plan assets, changes in interest rates that affect our discount rate assumptions, and modifications to our plans.

Pension funding requirements depend in part on returns on plan assets. As of December 31, 2010, our pension assets had a market value of $356 million, compared with $302 million at December 31, 2009. The amount of required contributions will depend, among other things, on actual returns on plan assets, changes in our plan asset return assumptions, changes in interest rates that affect our discount rate assumptions, changes in pension funding requirement laws, and modifications to our plans. Our estimates may change materially depending upon the impact of these and other factors. Changes in the financial markets may require us to make larger than previously anticipated contributions to our pension plans.

54


Income Taxes

We account for income taxes and separately recognize deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities. Such deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities represent the tax effect of temporary differences between financial reporting and tax reporting measured at enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. We also recognize only the impact of tax positions that, based on their technical merits, are more likely than not to be sustained upon an audit by the taxing authority.

We make judgments and estimates in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These judgments and estimates occur in the calculation of tax credits, benefits, and deductions and in the calculation of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes, as well as the interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. Significant changes to these estimates may result in an increase or decrease in our tax provision in a subsequent period.

The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions. It is inherently difficult and subjective to estimate uncertain tax positions, because we have to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We evaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision.

Both Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in their Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).

Long-Lived Asset Impairment

An impairment of a long-lived asset exists when the carrying value of an asset is not recoverable through future undiscounted cash flows from operations and when the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. We review the carrying value of long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable.

Long-lived asset impairment is a critical accounting estimate, as it is susceptible to change from period to period. To estimate whether the carrying value of an asset or asset group is impaired, we estimate the undiscounted cash flows that could be generated under a range of possible outcomes. To measure future cash flows, we are required to make assumptions about future production volumes, future product pricing, and future expenses to be incurred. In addition, estimates of future cash flows may change based on the availability of fiber, environmental requirements, capital spending, and other strategic management decisions. We estimate the fair value of an asset or asset group based on quoted market prices (the amount for which the asset(s) could be bought or sold in a current transaction with a third party) when available. When quoted market prices are not available, we use a discounted cash flow model to estimate fair value.

If the markets for our products deteriorate significantly or if we decide to invest capital differently and if other cash flow assumptions change, it is possible that we will be required to record noncash impairment charges that could have a material effect on our results of operations. Due to the numerous variables associated with our judgments and assumptions relating to the valuation of assets and the effects of changes on these valuations, both the precision and reliability of our estimates are subject to uncertainty. As additional information becomes known, we may change our estimates.

55


New and Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

For a listing of our new and recently adopted accounting standards, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Form 10-K.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Information concerning quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk can be found under the caption “Disclosures of Financial Market Risks” in “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Form 10-K.

See “Liquidity and Capital Resources, Operating Activities” in “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Form 10-K for our disclosures about our sensitivities to changes in prices for our major products, production inputs, and interest rates.

56


ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Boise Inc. Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)

(dollars and shares in thousands, except per-share data)

  Boise Inc.  Predecessor 
  Year Ended December 31  January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
 
 2010  2009  2008  
 

Sales

     

Trade

 $ 2,058,132   $ 1,935,410   $ 1,990,207   $258,430  

Related parties

  35,645    42,782    80,425    101,490  
                
  2,093,777    1,978,192    2,070,632    359,920  
                
 

Costs and expenses

     

Materials, labor, and other operating expenses

  1,634,039    1,596,214    1,756,826    313,931  

Fiber costs from related parties

  25,259    36,858    54,628    7,662  

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

  129,926    131,500    109,988    477  

Selling and distribution expenses

  58,107    55,524    48,278    9,097  

General and administrative expenses

  52,273    50,250    34,258    6,606  

St. Helens mill restructuring

  180    5,805    29,780      

Alternative fuel mixture credits, net

      (207,607        

Other (income) expense, net

  33    4,005    (2,980  (989
                
  1,899,817    1,672,549    2,030,778    336,784  
                
 

Income from operations

  193,960    305,643    39,854    23,136  
                

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

  890    2,639    (4,696  54  

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

  (43  568    (479    

Loss on extinguishment of debt

  (22,225  (44,102        

Interest expense

  (64,782  (83,263  (91,220  (2

Interest income

  306    367    2,246    161  
                
  (85,854  (123,791  (94,149  213  
                
 

Income (loss) before income taxes

  108,106    181,852    (54,295  23,349  

Income tax (provision) benefit

  (45,372  (28,010  8,772    (563
                

Net income (loss)

 $62,734   $153,842   $(45,523 $22,786  
                
 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

     

Basic

  80,461    78,355    73,636      

Diluted

  84,131    83,081    73,636      
 

Net income (loss) per common share:

     

Basic

 $0.78   $1.96   $(0.62 $  

Diluted

  0.75    1.85    (0.62    

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

57


Boise Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands)

   December 31 
   2010   2009 

ASSETS

    

Current

    

Cash and cash equivalents

  $166,833    $69,393  

Short-term investments

   10,621     10,023  

Receivables

    

Trade, less allowances of $603 and $839

   188,588     185,110  

Related parties

   1     2,056  

Other

   3,839     62,410  

Inventories

   261,471     252,173  

Deferred income taxes

   16,658       

Prepaid and other

   5,214     4,819  
          
   653,225     585,984  
          

Property

    

Property and equipment, net

   1,199,035     1,205,679  

Fiber farms and deposits

   18,285     17,094  
          
   1,217,320     1,222,773  
          

Deferred financing costs

   30,396     47,369  

Intangible assets, net

   29,605     32,358  

Other assets

   8,444     7,306  
          

Total assets

  $ 1,938,990    $ 1,895,790  
          

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

58


Boise Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)

(dollars and shares in thousands, except per-share data)

   December 31 
   2010  2009 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   

Current

   

Current portion of long-term debt

  $43,750   $30,711  

Income taxes payable

   82    240  

Accounts payable

   

Trade

   178,923    172,518  

Related parties

   291    2,598  

Accrued liabilities

   

Compensation and benefits

   54,574    67,948  

Interest payable

   10,535    4,946  

Other

   16,123    23,735  
         
   304,278    302,696  
         

Debt

   

Long-term debt, less current portion

   738,081    785,216  
         

Other

   

Deferred income taxes

   88,200    32,253  

Compensation and benefits

   121,318    123,889  

Other long-term liabilities

   40,278    30,801  
         
   249,796    186,943  
         

Commitments and contingent liabilities

   

Stockholders’ Equity

   

Preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share:

         

1,000 shares authorized; none issued

   

Common stock, $.0001 par value per share:

   8    8  

250,000 shares authorized;

   

84,845 shares and 84,419 shares issued and outstanding

   

Additional paid-in capital

   581,442    578,669  

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   (78,822  (71,553

Retained earnings

   144,207    113,811  
         

Total stockholders’ equity

   646,835    620,935  
         

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $ 1,938,990   $ 1,895,790  
         

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

59


Boise Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(dollars in thousands)

   Boise Inc.     Predecessor 
   Year Ended December 31     January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
 
  2010  2009  2008     

Cash provided by (used for) operations

       

Net income (loss)

  $62,734   $153,842   $(45,523   $22,786  

Items in net income (loss) not using (providing) cash

       

Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of deferred financing costs and other

   137,495    144,079    119,933      477  

Share-based compensation expense

   3,733    3,518    3,096        

Related-party interest expense

           2,760        

Notes payable interest expense

       9,000    5,512        

Pension and other postretirement benefit expense

   9,537    7,376    8,388      1,826  

Deferred income taxes

   38,884    27,709    (9,363    11  

Change in fair value of energy derivatives

   609    (5,877  7,445      (37

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

   43    (568  479        

St. Helens mill restructuring

           35,998        

(Gain) loss on sales of assets, net

   312    514          (943

Other

   (869  (2,639  4,696      (54

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   22,225    44,102            

Decrease (increase) in working capital, net of acquisitions

       

Receivables

   57,255    (18,579  25,296      (23,522

Inventories

   (17,120  83,037    (28,950    5,343  

Prepaid expenses

   4,690    1,470    (1,044    875  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

   (6,690  25,710    (17,801    (10,718

Current and deferred income taxes

   5,585    (372  (1,057    335  

Pension and other postretirement benefit payments

   (25,637  (13,001  (636    (1,826

Other

   (3,005  (609  (1,483    2,326  
                   

Cash provided by (used for) operations

   289,781    458,712    107,746      (3,121
                   

Cash provided by (used for) investment

       

Acquisition of businesses and facilities

       (543  (1,216,459      

Cash released from trust, net

           403,989        

Expenditures for property and equipment

   (111,619  (77,145  (90,597    (10,168

Purchases of short-term investments

   (25,336  (21,643          

Maturities of short-term investments

   24,744    11,615            

Sales of assets

   717    1,031    394      17,662  

Other

   2,224    2,168    (5,703    863  
                   

Cash provided by (used for) investment

   (109,270  (84,517  (908,376    8,357  
                   

Cash provided by (used for) financing

       

Issuances of long-term debt

   300,000    310,000    1,125,700        

Payments of long-term debt

   (334,096  (531,523  (88,250      

Extinguishment of debt

      ��(39,717          

Payments of notes payable

       (52,924          

Payments to stockholders for exercise of conversion rights

           (120,170      

Payments of deferred financing costs

   (12,003  (13,156  (81,898      

Payments of deferred underwriters fees

           (12,420      

Net equity transactions with related parties

                 (5,237

Exercises of warrants

   638                

Payments of special dividend

   (32,276              

Other

   (5,334              
                   

Cash provided by (used for) financing

   (83,071  (327,320  822,962      (5,237
                   

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   97,440    46,875    22,332      (1

Balance at beginning of the period

   69,393    22,518    186      8  
                   

Balance at end of the period

  $166,833   $69,393   $22,518     $7  
                   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

60


Boise Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(dollars and shares in thousands, except share data)

Common
Shares
Outstanding

    Total
Stockholders’
Equity
  Preferred
Stock
  Common
Stock
  Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Income
Accumulated
During
Development
Stage
  Retained
Earnings
(accumulated
deficit)
 
        
 51,750   Balance at December 31, 2007 $233,137   $   $5   $227,640   $   $5,492   $  
                                
 Comprehensive loss:       
 

Net loss

  (45,523                      (45,523
 Other comprehensive loss, net of tax       
 

Cash flow hedges

  (760              (760        
 

Unfunded accumulated benefit obligation

  (84,922              (84,922        
                             
 

Other comprehensive loss

  (85,682              (85,682        
                             
 Comprehensive loss $(131,205      
           
 

Reclassification of income accumulated during development stage

                      (5,492  5,492  
 37,857   

Issuance of common stock for acquisition at $9.15 per share (net of a 12% discount for lack of marketability)

  304,828        4    304,824              
 2,451   Restricted stock granted  3,096            3,096              
 (25)   Restricted stock forfeited                            
 30   Restricted stock vested                            
 

Shares of common stock subject to possible conversion converted to permanent equity

  159,760            159,760              
 (12,347)   

Reclassify shares of common stock subject to possible conversion that were not redeemed to permanent equity

  (120,170      (1  (120,169            
                                
 79,716   Balance at December 31, 2008 $449,446   $   $8   $575,151   $(85,682 $   $(40,031
                                
 Comprehensive income:       
 

Net income

  153,842                        153,842  
 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax       
 Cash flow hedges  207                207          
 Investment gains (losses)  (5              (5        
 

Changes in unfunded accumulated benefit obligation (net of tax of $8,600)

  13,927                13,927          
                             
 

Other comprehensive income

  14,129                14,129          
                             
 Comprehensive income $167,971        
           
 4,602   Restricted stock granted  3,518            3,518              
 (81)   Restricted stock forfeited                            
 182   Restricted stock units vested, net                            
                                
 84,419   Balance at December 31, 2009 $620,935   $   $8   $578,669   $(71,553 $   $113,811  
                                
 Comprehensive income:       
 

Net income

  62,734                        62,734  
 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

       
 

Cash flow hedges

  553                553          
 Investment gains (losses)  6                6          
 

Changes in unfunded accumulated benefit obligation (net of tax of $4,945)

  (7,828              (7,828        
                             
 Other comprehensive income  (7,269              (7,269        
                             
 Comprehensive income $55,465                       
           
        
 Dividends declared  (32,338                      (32,338
 Restricted stock excess tax  31            31              
 85   Warrants exercised  638            638              
 200   Restricted stock granted  3,733            3,733              
 (221)   Restricted stock withheld for taxes  (1,629          (1,629            
 (42)   Restricted stock forfeited                            
 404   Restricted stock units vested, net                            
                                
 84,845   Balance at December 31, 2010 $646,835   $   $8   $581,442   $(78,822 $   $144,207  
                                

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

61


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)

(dollars in thousands)

   BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC     Predecessor 
   Year Ended December 31     January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
 
  2010  2009  2008   

Sales

       

Trade

  $ 2,058,132   $ 1,935,410   $ 1,990,207     $258,430  

Related parties

   35,645    42,782    80,425      101,490  
                   
   2,093,777    1,978,192    2,070,632      359,920  
                   
 

Costs and expenses

       

Materials, labor, and other operating
expenses

   1,634,039    1,596,214    1,756,826      313,931  

Fiber costs from related parties

   25,259    36,858    54,628      7,662  

Depreciation, amortization, and
depletion

   129,926    131,500    109,988      477  

Selling and distribution expenses

   58,107    55,524    48,278      9,097  

General and administrative expenses

   52,273    50,250    34,318      6,606  

St. Helens mill restructuring

   180    5,805    29,780        

Alternative fuel mixture credits, net

       (207,607          

Other (income) expense, net

   33    4,005    (2,980    (989
                   
   1,899,817    1,672,549    2,030,838      336,784  
                   
 

Income from operations

   193,960    305,643    39,794      23,136  
                   

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

   890    2,639    (4,696    54  

Change in fair value of interest rate
derivatives

   (43  568    (479      

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   (22,225  (66,784          

Interest expense

   (64,782  (74,263  (82,945    (2

Interest income

   306    367    617      161  
                   
   (85,854  (137,473  (87,503    213  
                   
 

Income (loss) before income taxes

   108,106    168,170    (47,709    23,349  

Income tax (provision) benefit

   (44,529  (20,356  5,849      (563
                   

Net income (loss)

  $63,577   $147,814   $(41,860   $22,786  
                   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

62


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands)

   December 31 
   2010   2009 

ASSETS

    

Current

    

Cash and cash equivalents

  $166,833    $69,393  

Short-term investments

   10,621     10,023  

Receivables

    

Trade, less allowances of $603 and $839

   188,588     185,110  

Related parties

   1     2,056  

Other

   3,839     62,410  

Inventories

   261,471     252,173  

Deferred income taxes

   16,658       

Prepaid and other

   5,214     4,819  
          
   653,225     585,984  
          

Property

    

Property and equipment, net

   1,199,035     1,205,679  

Fiber farms and deposits

   18,285     17,094  
          
   1,217,320     1,222,773  
          

Deferred financing costs

   30,396     47,369  

Intangible assets, net

   29,605     32,358  

Other assets

   8,444     7,306  
          

Total assets

  $  1,938,990    $  1,895,790  
          

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

63


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)

(dollars in thousands)

   December 31 
   2010   2009 

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

    

Current

    

Current portion of long-term debt

  $43,750    $30,711  

Income taxes payable

   82     240  

Accounts payable

    

Trade

   178,923     172,518  

Related parties

   291     2,598  

Accrued liabilities

    

Compensation and benefits

   54,574     67,948  

Interest payable

   10,535     4,946  

Other

   16,123     23,735  
          
   304,278     302,696  
          

Debt

    

Long-term debt, less current portion

   738,081     785,216  
          

Other

    

Deferred income taxes

   79,451     24,563  

Compensation and benefits

   121,318     123,889  

Other long-term liabilities

   40,530     30,836  
          
   241,299     179,288  
          

Commitments and contingent liabilities

    

Capital

    

Business unit equity

   655,332     628,590  
          

Total liabilities and capital

  $  1,938,990    $  1,895,790  
          

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

64


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(dollars in thousands)

   BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC     Predecessor 
   Year Ended December 31     January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
 
  2010  2009  2008   
 

Cash provided by (used for) operations

       

Net income (loss)

  $63,577   $147,814   $(41,860   $22,786  

Items in net income (loss) not using (providing) cash

       

Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of deferred financing costs and other

   137,495    144,079    119,933      477  

Share-based compensation expense

   3,733    3,518    3,096        

Pension and other postretirement benefit expense

   9,537    7,376    8,388      1,826  

Deferred income taxes

   37,882    20,020    (6,439    11  

Change in fair value of energy derivatives

   609    (5,877  7,445      (37

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

   43    (568  479        

St. Helens mill restructuring

           35,998        

(Gain) loss on sales of assets, net

   312    514          (943

Other

   (869  (2,639  4,696      (54

Loss on extinguishment of debt

   22,225    66,784            

Decrease (increase) in working capital, net of
acquisitions

       

Receivables

   57,255    (21,503  25,296      (23,522

Inventories

   (17,120  83,037    (28,950    5,343  

Prepaid expenses

   4,690    1,470    (1,103    875  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

   (6,690  25,710    (16,785    (10,718

Current and deferred income taxes

   5,744    (422  222      335  

Pension and other postretirement benefit payments

   (25,637  (13,001  (636    (1,826

Other

   (3,005  (609  (1,848    2,326  
                   

Cash provided by (used for) operations

   289,781    455,703    107,932      (3,121
                   

Cash provided by (used for) investment

       

Acquisition of businesses and facilities

       (543  (1,216,459      

Expenditures for property and equipment

   (111,619  (77,145  (90,597    (10,168

Purchases of short-term investments

   (25,336  (21,643          

Maturities of short-term investments

   24,744    11,615            

Sales of assets

   717    1,031    394      17,662  

Other

   2,224    2,168    (5,703    863  
                   

Cash provided by (used for) investment

   (109,270  (84,517  (1,312,365    8,357  
                   

Cash provided by (used for) financing

       

Issuances of long-term debt

   300,000    310,000    1,125,700        

Payments of long-term debt

   (334,096  (531,523  (88,250      

Extinguishment of debt

       (39,717          

Payments (to) from Boise Inc., net

   (31,639  (49,915  271,399        

Payments of deferred financing costs

   (12,003  (13,156  (81,898      

Net equity transactions with related parties

                 (5,237

Other

   (5,333              
                   

Cash provided by (used for) financing

   (83,071  (324,311  1,226,951      (5,237
                   

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   97,440    46,875    22,518      (1

Balance at beginning of the period

   69,393    22,518          8  
                   

Balance at end of the period

  $166,833   $69,393   $22,518     $7  
                   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

65


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

Consolidated Statements of Capital

(dollars in thousands)

   Total Capital  Business
Unit Equity
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 

Balance at January 18, 2008 (Inception)

  $   $   $  

Issuance of 1,000 common units

       638,761    638,761      

Comprehensive loss:

    

Net loss

   (41,860  (41,860    

Other comprehensive income loss, net of tax

    

Cash flow hedges

   (760      (760

Unfunded accumulated benefit obligations

   (84,922      (84,922
             

Other comprehensive loss:

   (85,682      (85,682
             

Comprehensive loss

  $(127,542  
       

Net equity transactions with Boise Inc.

   1,825    1,825      
             

Balance at December 31, 2008

  $513,044   $598,726   $(85,682
             

Comprehensive income:

    

Net income

   147,814    147,814      

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

    

Cash flow hedges

   207        207  

Investment gains (losses)

   (5      (5

Changes in unfunded accumulated benefit obligation (net of tax of $8,600)

   13,927        13,927  
             

Other comprehensive income

   14,129        14,129  
             

Comprehensive income

  $161,943    
       

Net equity transactions with Boise Inc.

   (46,397  (46,397    
             

Balance at December 31, 2009

  $628,590   $700,143   $(71,553
             

Comprehensive income:

    

Net income

   63,577    63,577      

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

    

Cash flow hedges

   553        553  

Investment gains (losses)

   6        6 ��

Changes in unfunded accumulated benefit obligation (net of tax of $4,945)

   (7,828      (7,828
             

Other comprehensive income

   (7,269      (7,269
             

Comprehensive income

  $56,308    
       

Net equity transactions with Boise Inc.

   (29,566  (29,566    
             

Balance at December 31, 2010

  $655,332   $    734,154   $(78,822
             

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

66


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1.    Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

In this filing, unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or “Boise” refer to Boise Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (BZ Intermediate). Boise Inc. is a large, diverse United States-based manufacturer of paper and packaging products.

Paper Products

Communication-Based Papers

Imaging papers for the office and home, also known as cut-size office papers.

Printing and converting papers: papers used by commercial printers or converters to manufacture envelopes, forms, and other commercial paper products.

Packaging-Demand-Driven Papers

Label and release papers: These papers include label facestocks, as well as release liners, which our customers combine and convert to labels for use on consumer and commercial packaged products.

Flexible packaging papers: coated and uncoated papers sold to customers that create flexible packaging products for food and nonfood applications.

Corrugating medium: unbleached paperboard, which when corrugated and combined with linerboard, forms corrugated board—the key raw material in the manufacture of corrugated sheets and containers. Corrugating medium is also part of a broader category of products called containerboard.

Market Pulp

Market pulp: pulp sold to customers in the open market for use in the manufacture of paper products.

Packaging Products

Linerboard: paperboard, which when combined with corrugating medium, forms corrugated board—the key raw material in the manufacture of corrugated sheets and containers. Linerboard is also part of a broader category of products called containerboard.

Corrugated sheets: containerboard sheets that are sold primarily to converters that produce a variety of corrugated products.

Corrugated containers: corrugated sheets that have been fed through converting machines to create containers, which are used in the packaging of fresh fruit and vegetables, processed food, beverages, and other industrial and consumer products.

Newsprint: paper commonly used for printing newspapers, other publications, and advertising material.

We own paper mills in the following locations: Jackson, Alabama; International Falls, Minnesota; St. Helens, Oregon; and Wallula, Washington, all of which manufacture imaging, printing, and converting papers. These products are a subset of a larger product category called uncoated freesheet papers. We also classify label and release and flexible packaging products as uncoated freesheet papers. All of these mills, except St. Helens, also manufacture pulp, which is either sold on the market or used in our own operations to manufacture paper.

67


We also own a mill in DeRidder, Louisiana, which produces linerboard and newsprint. Additionally, we own seven plants that manufacture corrugated packaging products. Our plants in Burley, Idaho; Nampa, Idaho; Sparks, Nevada; Salem, Oregon; Salt Lake City, Utah; and Wallula, Washington, all manufacture corrugated containers. Our plant in Waco, Texas, manufactures corrugated sheets.

Labor

As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately 4,100 employees. Approximately 57% of these employees worked pursuant to collective bargaining agreements. As of December 31, 2010, approximately 50% of our employees were working pursuant to collective bargaining agreements that have expired or will expire within one year.

Our operations began on February 22, 2008, when entities controlled by Boise Cascade Holdings, L.L.C. (Boise Cascade) sold their paper and packaging assets to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. (the Acquisition). As part of the Acquisition, Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. changed its name to Boise Inc. In this Form 10-K, we use the term “Predecessor” to reference the periods before the Acquisition, including the period when our assets were operated by Boise Cascade. See Note 17, Acquisition of Boise Cascade’s Paper and Packaging Operations, for more information related to the Acquisition.

The following sets forth our operating structure at December 31, 2010:

Boise Inc., headquartered in Boise, Idaho, operates and reports its business in three reportable segments: Paper, Packaging, and Corporate and Other (support services).

68


The accompanying Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss) and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2008, include the activities of Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. prior to the Acquisition and the operations of the acquired businesses from February 22, 2008, through December 31, 2008. The Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss) and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows of the Predecessor for the period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, are presented for comparative purposes.

For the Predecessor period presented, the consolidated financial statements include accounts attributed specifically to the Paper Group and a portion of Boise Cascade’s shared corporate general and administrative expenses. These shared services include, but are not limited to, finance, accounting, legal, information technology, and human resource functions. Some corporate costs related solely to the Predecessor and were allocated totally to these operations. Shared corporate general and administrative expenses not specifically identifiable to the Paper Group were allocated primarily based on average sales, assets, and labor costs. The Predecessor consolidated financial statements do not include an allocation of Boise Cascade’s debt, interest, and deferred financing costs, because none of these items were specifically identified as corporate advances to, or borrowings by, the Predecessor. Boise Cascade used interest rate swaps to hedge variable interest rate risk. Because debt and interest costs are not allocated to the Predecessor, the effects of the interest rate swaps are not included in the consolidated financial statements. During the Predecessor period presented, income taxes, where applicable, were calculated as if the Predecessor were a separate taxable entity. For the period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, the majority of the businesses and assets of the Predecessor were held and operated by limited liability companies, which are not subject to entity-level federal or state income taxation. In addition to the businesses and assets held and operated by limited liability companies, the Predecessor had taxable corporations subject to federal, state, and local income taxes for which taxes were recorded. Information on the allocations and related-party transactions is included in Note 4, Transactions With Related Parties.

2.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Consolidation and Use of Estimates

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Boise Inc. and its subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany balances and transactions. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Such estimates include valuation of accounts receivable, inventories, intangible assets, and asset retirement obligations; assumptions used in retirement; the recognition, measurement, and valuation of income taxes; the determination and allocation of the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in an acquisition; and assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. We adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Volatile credit, equity, foreign currency, and energy markets and declines in consumer spending have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in these estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements in future periods.

69


Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, our price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Delivery is not considered to have occurred until the customer takes title and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership. The timing of revenue recognition is dependent on shipping terms. Revenue is recorded at the time of shipment for terms designated freight on board (FOB) shipping point. For sales transactions designated FOB destination, revenue is recorded when the product is delivered to the customer’s delivery site. Fees for shipping and handling charged to customers for sales transactions are included in “Sales.” Costs related to shipping and handling are included in “Materials, labor, and other operating expenses.”

Share-Based Compensation

We accrue compensation expense for the restricted stock and restricted stock units (collectively restricted stock) granted under the Boise Inc. Incentive and Performance Plan (the Plan) based on the fair value on the date of the grant. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period for the restricted stock grants that vest over time and ratably over the award period for the restricted stock grants that vest based on the closing price of Boise Inc. stock. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, we recognized $3.7 million, $3.5 million, and $3.1 million, respectively, of compensation expense. Most of these costs were recorded in “General and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). See Note 14, Stockholders’ Equity and Capital, for a discussion of the Plan and the method we use to calculate compensation expense.

During the Predecessor period presented, equity compensation was granted to the Predecessor’s employees under Boise Cascade’s equity compensation plans. These equity compensation plans were accounted for in the same manner we account for our current plans. During the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, the Predecessor recognized $0.2 million of compensation expense, most of which was recorded in “General and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss).

Research and Development Costs

We expense research and development costs as incurred, and they were immaterial for all periods presented. These expenses are generally recorded in “Materials, labor, and other operating expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).

Advertising Costs

We expense advertising costs as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, advertising costs were $3.0 million, $2.7 million, and $2.3 million, respectively. For the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, advertising costs were $1.0 million. These expenses are generally recorded in “Selling and distribution expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid interest-earning investments, including time deposits and certificates of deposit, with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents unless designated as available for sale and classified as an investment. The fair value of these investments approximates their carrying value. Cash equivalents totaled $156.5 million and $65.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2010 and 2009.

70


Short-Term Investments

Investments with original maturities of greater than three months and remaining maturities of less than one year are classified as short-term investments. Our short-term investments are classified as available for sale and are recorded at market value. Changes in market value are reflected in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Unrealized losses determined to be other than temporary are recorded in our Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss). The cost of marketable securities sold is determined based on the specific identification method.

Trade Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Trade accounts receivable are stated at the amount we expect to collect. Trade accounts receivable do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the losses we expect will result from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We determine the allowance based on a combination of actual historical write-off experience and an analysis of specific customer accounts. We periodically review our allowance for doubtful accounts, and adjustments to the valuation allowance are charged to income. Trade accounts receivable balances that remain outstanding after we have used reasonable collection efforts are written off through a charge to the valuation allowance and a credit to accounts receivable. We may, at times, insure or arrange for guarantees on our receivables.

Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable, long-term debt, and energy hedges. The recorded values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair values based on their short-term nature. Our long-term debt is recorded at the face value of those obligations. Our energy hedges are recorded at fair value.

We are exposed to market risks, including changes in interest rates and energy prices. We employ a variety of practices to manage these risks, including operating and financing activities and, where deemed appropriate, the use of derivative instruments. Derivative instruments are used only for risk management purposes and not for speculation or trading. Derivatives are such that a specific debt instrument, contract, or anticipated purchase determines the amount, maturity, and other specifics of the hedge. If a derivative contract is entered into, we either determine that it is an economic hedge or we designate the derivative as a cash flow or fair value hedge. We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well as our risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedged transactions. For those derivatives that are not designated as economic hedges, such as cash flow or fair value hedges, we formally assess, both at the derivatives’ inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the hedged items. The ineffective portion of hedging transactions is recognized in income (loss).

We record all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The fair value of these instruments is determined by third parties. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded in either “Net income (loss)” or “Other comprehensive income (loss)” as appropriate. The gain or loss on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges is included in “Other comprehensive income (loss)” in the period in which changes in fair value occur and is reclassified to income (loss) in the period in which the hedged item affects income (loss), and any ineffectiveness is recognized currently in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). The fair value of the hedged exposure is presumed to be the market value of the hedging instrument when

71


critical terms match. The gain or loss on derivatives designated as fair value hedges and the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are included in income (loss) in the period in which changes in fair value occur. The gain or loss on derivatives that have not been designated as hedging instruments is included in income (loss) in the period in which changes in fair value occur.

Customer Rebates and Allowances

We provide rebates to our customers based on the volume of their purchases. We provide the rebates to increase the sell-through of our products. The rebates are recorded as a decrease in “Sales, Trade” in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $13.7 million and $16.1 million, respectively, of rebates payable recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Inventory Valuation

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is based on the average cost method of inventory valuation. Manufactured inventories include costs for materials, labor, and factory overhead.

Inventories include the following (dollars in thousands):

   December 31 
   2010   2009 

Finished goods

  $123,329    $120,817  

Work in process

   34,906     22,677  

Fiber

   36,166     34,557  

Other raw materials and supplies

   67,070     74,122  
          
  $ 261,471    $ 252,173  
          

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment acquired in the Acquisition were recorded at estimated fair value on the date of the Acquisition. Property and equipment acquired subsequent to the Acquisition are recorded at cost. Cost includes expenditures for major improvements and replacements and the amount of interest cost associated with significant capital additions. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized an immaterial amount of capitalized interest, and for the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not recognize any capitalized interest. During the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, the Predecessor recognized $0.1 million of capitalized interest. We expense all repair and maintenance costs as incurred.When property and equipment are retired, sold, or otherwise disposed of, the asset’s carrying amount and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in income (loss). In all periods presented, we used the straight-line method of depreciation.

72


Property and equipment consisted of the following asset classes and the following general range of estimated useful lives (dollars in thousands):

      General Range of
Estimated  Useful
Lives in Years
 
   December 31  
   2010  2009  

Land

  $31,875   $31,875    NA  

Buildings and improvements

   219,345    199,086    9-40  

Machinery and equipment

   1,260,265    1,176,494    3-20  

Construction in progress

   27,667    18,992    NA  
          
   1,539,152    1,426,447   

Less accumulated depreciation

   (340,117  (220,768  NA  
          
  $ 1,199,035   $ 1,205,679   
          

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, was $120.5 million, $120.9 million, and $102.0 million, respectively.

Fiber Farms and Deposits

Costs for activities related to the establishment of a new crop of trees, including planting, thinning, fertilization, pest control, herbicide application, irrigation, and land lease costs, are capitalized, while costs for administration, harvesting, insurance, and property taxes are expensed. The capitalized costs are accumulated by specifically identifiable farm or irrigation blocks. We charge capitalized costs, excluding land, to “Depreciation, amortization, and depletion” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) at the time the fiber is harvested based on actual accumulated costs associated with fiber cut.

We are a party to a number of long-term log and fiber supply agreements. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, our total obligation for log and fiber purchases under contracts with third parties was approximately $81.2 million and $76.4 million, respectively. Except for deposits required pursuant to wood supply contracts, these obligations are not recorded in our consolidated financial statements until contract payment terms take effect. Under most of the log and fiber supply agreements, we have the right to cancel or reduce our commitments in the event of a mill curtailment or shutdown. Future purchase prices under most of these agreements are set quarterly or semiannually based on regional market prices, and the estimate is based on contract terms or first quarter 2011 pricing. Our log and fiber obligations are subject to change based on, among other things, the effect of governmental laws and regulations, our manufacturing operations not operating in the normal course of business, log and fiber availability, and the status of environmental appeals.

Long-Lived Asset Impairment

An impairment of long-lived assets exists when the carrying value of an asset is not recoverable through future undiscounted cash flows from operations and when the carrying value of an asset exceeds its fair value. We review the carrying value of long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable.

Intangible Assets

Our policy is to assess intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year, and immediately if an indicator of possible impairment exists, using a fair-value-based

73


approach. We also evaluate the remaining useful lives of our purchased intangible assets to determine whether any adjustments to the useful lives are necessary.

Deferred Software Costs

We defer internal-use software costs that benefit future years. These costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the expected life of the software, typically three to five years. “Other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets include $5.3 million and $4.1 million of deferred software costs at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We amortized $0.8 million, $1.4 million, and $0.7 million, respectively, of deferred software costs for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008. For the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, amortization of deferred software costs totaled $0.1 million.

Pension Benefits

Several estimates and assumptions are required to record pension costs and liabilities, including discount rate, return on assets, salary increases, and longevity and service lives of employees. We review and update these assumptions annually unless a plan curtailment or other event occurs requiring we update the estimates on an interim basis. While we believe that the assumptions used to measure our pension obligations are reasonable, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may materially affect our pension obligations and future expense.

Taxes Collected

We present taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities on a net basis in our Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss).

New and Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-06,Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This ASU amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, to require reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair value measurements, including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. The ASU also clarifies existing fair value measurement disclosure guidance about the level of disaggregation, inputs, and valuation techniques. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2010, and the adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. The detailed Level 3 roll-forward disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of the Level 3 roll-forward disclosures to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operation.

In June 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17 (Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167),Consolidations (Topic 810): Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities, which amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable-interest entities (VIEs). This guidance requires that entities evaluate former qualified special-purpose entities for consolidation, changes the approach to determining a VIE’s primary beneficiary from a quantitative assessment to a qualitative assessment, and increases the frequency of required reassessment to determine whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. It also requires additional year-end and interim disclosures. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2010, and the adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. During first quarter 2010, we reassessed our primary beneficiary assertion relating to Louisiana Timber Procurement, L.L.C., our only VIE, after Boise Cascade sold all of its remaining interest in us. This

74


analysis, or any since first quarter 2010, did not change our assertions or have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

There were no other accounting standards recently issued that had or are expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

3.    Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, when we had publicly traded shares outstanding, net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share is calculated as follows (dollars and shares in thousands, except per-share data):

   Year Ended December 31 
   2010   2009   2008 

Net income (loss)

  $    62,734    $    153,842    $    (45,523

Weighted average number of common shares for basic net income (loss) per share

   80,461     78,355     73,636  

Incremental effect of dilutive common stock equivalents:

      

Common stock warrants (a)

               

Restricted stock and restricted stock units (b)

   3,670     4,726       
               

Weighted average number of shares for diluted net income (loss) per share

   84,131     83,081     73,636  
               

Net income (loss) per share

      

Basic

  $0.78    $1.96    $(0.62
               

Diluted (a) (b)

  $0.75    $1.85    $(0.62
               

(a)For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, warrants to purchase 44.3 million, 44.4 million, and 44.4 million shares of common stock, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share, because the exercise price exceeded the average market price of our common stock.

(b)Restricted stock and restricted stock units for the year ended December 31, 2008, were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share, because inclusion of these amounts would be antidilutive.

Net income (loss) per common share is not applicable to BZ Intermediate, because it does not have common shares.

4.    Transactions With Related Parties

From February 22, 2008, through early March 2010, Boise Cascade held a significant interest in us, and our transactions with Boise Cascade were related-party transactions. In early March 2010, Boise Cascade sold all of its remaining investment in us, and accordingly, it is no longer a related party.

The transportation and other outsourcing services revenues described below were earned during January and February 2010. After March 2010, no transactions between Boise Cascade and us are considered related-party transactions, except those concerning Louisiana Timber Procurement Company, L.L.C. (LTP) described below.

75


Related-Party Sales

We provide transportation services to Boise Cascade. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, we recorded $0.3 million, $2.3 million, and $3.4 million, respectively, of sales for transportation services in “Sales, Related parties” in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). For the period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, the Predecessor recorded $0.6 million of sales for transportation services to Boise Cascade.

We are party to an outsourcing services agreement under which we provide a number of corporate staff services to Boise Cascade at our cost. These services include information technology, accounting, and human resource services. The agreement, as extended, expires on February 22, 2013. It will automatically renew for one-year terms unless either party provides notice of termination to the other party at least 12 months in advance of the expiration date. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, we recognized $2.3 million, $15.0 million, and $12.1 million, respectively, in “Sales, Related parties” in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and the same amounts in “Costs and expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) related to this agreement within our Corporate and Other segment.

LTP, a variable-interest entity that is 50% owned by Boise Inc. and 50% owned by Boise Cascade, sells wood to Boise Cascade and Boise Inc. at prices designed to approximate market prices. LTP procures saw timber, pulpwood, residual chips, and other residual wood fiber to meet the wood and fiber requirements of Boise Inc. and Boise Cascade. We are the primary beneficiary of LTP, as we have power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of LTP; therefore, we consolidate LTP in our financial statements in our Packaging segment. We reassess this relationship quarterly to ensure that we remain the primary beneficiary of LTP. Although Boise Cascade is no longer a related party to our operations, Boise Cascade continues to be a related party to LTP; therefore, sales between Boise Cascade and LTP are related-party sales in our consolidated financial statements.

As of December 31, 2010, the carrying amounts of LTP’s assets and liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet were both $2.1 million and related primarily to noninventory working capital. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we recorded $33.0million and $25.5 million, respectively, of LTP sales to Boise Cascade in “Sales, Related parties” in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and approximately the same amount of expenses in “Materials, labor, and other operating expenses.” During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded $64.9 million of sales to Boise Cascade. The Predecessor sold $10.8 million of wood to Boise Cascade’s wood products business during the period of January 1 through February 21, 2008. These sales are included in “Sales, Related parties” in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) in our Packaging segment.

During the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, the Predecessor sold paper and paper products to OfficeMax Incorporated (OfficeMax) at sales prices that were designed to approximate market prices. Subsequent to the Acquisition, OfficeMax is no longer a related party. For additional information concerning related-party sales to OfficeMax during the Predecessor period, see Note 8, Concentrations of Risk.

Related-Party Costs and Expenses

During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, fiber purchases from related parties were $25.3 million, $36.9 million, and $54.6 million, respectively. During the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, fiber purchases from related parties were $7.7 million. Most of these purchases related to chip and log purchases from Boise Cascade’s wood products business. All of the costs associated with these purchases were recorded as “Fiber costs from related parties” in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). Beginning in March 2010,

76


“Fiber costs from related parties” represents only LTP’s purchases from Boise Cascade. Fiber purchases from Boise Cascade by Boise Inc. subsequent to February 2010 are recorded as “Materials, labor, and other operating expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).

During the Predecessor period, the Predecessor used services and administrative staff of Boise Cascade. These services included, but were not limited to, finance, accounting, legal, information technology, and human resource functions. The costs not specifically identifiable to the Predecessor were allocated based primarily on average sales, assets, and labor costs. These costs are included in “General and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). The Predecessor believes the allocations are a reasonable reflection of its use of the services. However, had the Predecessor operated on a stand-alone basis, it estimates that its Corporate and Other segment would have reported approximately $2.5 million of segment expenses before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization for the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008.

During the Predecessor period, some of the Predecessor’s employees participated in Boise Cascade’s noncontributory defined benefit pension and contributory defined contribution savings plans. The Predecessor treated its participants in the pension plans as participants in multiemployer plans. The Predecessor recorded costs associated with the employees who participated in these plans in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). For the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, the Statements of Income (Loss) included $3.9 million of expenses attributable to its participation in Boise Cascade’s defined benefit and defined contribution plans.

During the Predecessor period presented, the Predecessor’s employees and former employees also participated in Boise Cascade’s other postretirement healthcare benefit plans. All of the Predecessor’s postretirement healthcare benefit plans were unfunded (see Note 13, Retirement and Benefit Plans). In addition, some of the Predecessor’s employees participated in equity compensation programs.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded $2.8 million of related-party interest expense in “Interest expense” in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). This expense is related to the subordinated promissory note we issued to Boise Cascade in connection with the Acquisition. After the Acquisition, the note was transferred to parties unrelated to Boise Cascade or to us. Accordingly, we no longer record the note as a related-party note on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. This note was repaid as part of our October 2009 debt restructuring. For additional information on the debt restructuring, see Note 11, Debt.

5.    Other (Income) Expense

“Other (income) expense, net” includes miscellaneous income and expense items. The components of “Other (income) expense, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) are as follows (dollars in thousands):

   Boise Inc.        Predecessor 
   Year Ended December 31        January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
 
  2010  2009   2008    
 

Changes in supplemental pension plans

  $   $    $(2,914    $  

Sales of assets, net

   312    514            (941

Other, net (a)

     (279  3,491     (66     (48
                     
  $33   $  4,005    $  (2,980    $(989
                     

(a)The year ended December 31, 2009, included $3.5 million of expense related to the indefinite idling of the D2 newsprint machine at our mill in DeRidder, Louisiana, which was recorded in our Packaging segment.

77


6.    Income Taxes

For the year ended December 31, 2010, Boise Inc.’s effective tax provision rate was 42.0%. The primary reason for the difference from the federal statutory income tax rate of 35.0% was the effect of state income taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2009, Boise Inc.’s effective tax provision rate was 15.4%. The primary reason for the difference from the federal statutory income tax rate of 35.0% was the release of valuation allowances and the effect of state income taxes. During fourth quarter 2009, Boise Inc. determined that it was more likely than not that its deferred tax assets would be realized due to current-year income from continuing operations and that it would be able to utilize deferred tax assets to offset deferred tax liabilities. Therefore, Boise Inc. recognized the reversal of its entire valuation allowance as an income tax benefit from continuing operations. For the year ended December 31, 2008, Boise Inc.’s effective tax benefit rate was 16.2%. The primary reason for the difference from the federal statutory income tax rate of 35.0% was the valuation allowance recorded during 2008.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, BZ Intermediate’s effective tax provision rate was 41.2%. The primary reason for the difference from the federal statutory income tax rate of 35.0% was the effect of state income taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2009, BZ Intermediate’s effective tax provision rate was 12.1%. The primary reason for the difference from the federal statutory income tax rate of 35.0% was the release of valuation allowances and the effect of state income taxes. During fourth quarter 2009, BZ Intermediate determined that it was more likely than not that its deferred tax assets would be realized due to current-year income from continuing operations and that it would be able to utilize deferred tax assets to offset deferred tax liabilities. Therefore, BZ Intermediate recognized the reversal of its entire valuation allowance as an income tax benefit from continuing operations. For the year ended December 31, 2008, BZ Intermediate’s effective tax benefit rate was 12.3%. The primary reason for the difference from the federal statutory income tax rate of 35.0% was the valuation allowance recorded during 2008.

During the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, the majority of the Predecessor businesses and assets were held and operated by limited liability companies, which were not subject to entity-level federal or state income taxation. For the separate Predecessor subsidiaries that were taxed as corporations, the effective tax rate was 37.6%. During this period, the primary reason for the difference in tax rates was the effect of state income taxes.

78


A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal tax benefit (provision) and the reported tax benefit (provision) is as follows (dollars in thousands):

   Boise Inc. 
   Year Ended December 31 
   2010  2009  2008 

Income (loss) before income taxes

  $  108,106   $  181,852   $  (54,295

Statutory U.S. income tax rate

   35.0  35.0  35.0

Statutory tax benefit (provision)

  $(37,837 $(63,648 $19,003  

State taxes

   (4,120  (7,432  1,845  

Nondeductible interest on applicable high-yield discount obligations

       (594  (1,167

Valuation allowance

   (307  44,063    (10,884

Nondeductible costs

   (652  (561  (423

Other

   (2,456  162    398  
             

Reported tax benefit (provision)

  $(45,372 $(28,010 $8,772  
             

Effective income tax benefit (provision) rate

   (42.0)%   (15.4)%   16.2
             

   BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC 
   Year Ended December 31 
   2010  2009  2008 

Income (loss) before income taxes

  $  108,106   $  168,170   $  (47,709

Statutory U.S. income tax rate

   35.0  35.0  35.0

Statutory tax benefit (provision)

  $(37,837 $(58,859 $16,698  

State taxes

   (4,120  (6,858  1,724  

Valuation allowance

   (307  45,719    (12,540

Nondeductible costs

   (652  (561  (423

Other

   (1,613  203    390  
             

Reported tax benefit (provision)

  $(44,529 $(20,356 $5,849  
             

Effective income tax benefit (provision) rate

   (41.2)%   (12.1)%   12.3
             

The income tax (provision) benefit shown in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) includes the following (dollars in thousands):

   Boise Inc. 
   Year Ended December 31 
   2010  2009  2008 

Current income tax (provision) benefit

    

Federal

  $(4,253 $274   $(578

State

   (2,236  (563  2  

Foreign

   1    (12  (15
             

Total current

   (6,488  (301  (591
             

Deferred income tax (provision) benefit

    

Federal

   (34,061  (21,282  8,778  

State

   (4,831  (6,427  585  

Foreign

   8          
             

Total deferred

   (38,884  (27,709  9,363  
             

Total (provision) benefit for income taxes

  $  (45,372 $  (28,010 $  8,772  
             

79


   BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC 
   Year Ended December 31 
   2010  2009  2008 

Current income tax (provision) benefit

    

Federal

  $(4,455 $274   $(589

State

   (2,194  (599  13  

Foreign

   1    (12  (14
             

Total current

   (6,648  (337  (590
             

Deferred income tax (provision) benefit

    

Federal

   (33,150  (14,567    5,854  

State

   (4,739  (5,452  585  

Foreign

   8          
             

Total deferred

   (37,881  (20,019  6,439  
             

Total (provision) benefit for income taxes

  $  (44,529 $  (20,356 $5,849  
             

During the year ended December 31, 2010, Boise Inc.’s cash paid for taxes, net of refunds received, was $0.7 million. During the year ended December 31, 2009, Boise Inc.’s cash received for taxes, net of payments made, was $3.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2008, Boise Inc.’s cash paid for taxes, net of refunds received, was $1.4 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, BZ Intermediate’s cash paid for taxes, net of refunds received, was $0.7 million. During the year ended December 31, 2009, BZ Intermediate’s cash received for taxes, net of payments made, was $0.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2008, BZ Intermediate’s cash paid for taxes, net of refunds received, was $32,000.

During the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, cash paid for taxes, net of refunds received, was immaterial.

At December 31, 2010, Boise Inc. had federal net operating losses of $132.8 million, which expire in 2028 and 2029, with a tax value of $46.5 million. At December 31, 2010, Boise Inc. had state net operating loss carryovers, which expire between 2013 and 2029, with a tax value of $4.9 million. At December 31, 2010, Boise Inc. had capital losses of $2.3 million, which will expire between 2013 and 2015, and $4.6 million of alternative minimum tax credits that carry over indefinitely.

At December 31, 2010, BZ Intermediate had federal net operating losses of $133.5 million, which expire in 2028 and 2029, with a tax value of $46.7 million. At December 31, 2010, BZ Intermediate had state net operating loss carryovers, which expire between 2013 and 2029, with a tax value of $4.3 million. At December 31, 2010, BZ Intermediate had capital losses of $2.3 million, which will expire between 2013 and 2015, and $4.8 million of alternative minimum tax credits that carry over indefinitely.

Due to Internal Revenue Code Section 382, changes in our ownership limit the amount of net operating losses that we may utilize in any one year. However, we believe it is more likely than not that our net operating losses will be fully realizable before they expire in 2028 and 2029.

80


The components of the net deferred tax liability/asset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows (dollars in thousands):

   Boise Inc. 
   December 31 
   2010   2009 
   Assets  Liabilities   Assets   Liabilities 

Employee benefits

  $62,215   $517    $61,863    $477  

Property and equipment

       194,572          132,413  

Deferred financing costs

   1,682    140     1,906     2,989  

Intangible assets and other

   321    12,957     224     13,522  

Net operating loss

   57,157         58,564       

Alternative minimum tax

   4,645                

Reserves

   4,027         4,011       

Inventories

   10,488         4,163       

Deferred income

       8,779          6,773  

Unearned income

                 21,860  

State income tax adjustments

   3,265    213     2,344     213  

Valuation allowance

   (890              

Other

   4,521    1,795     3,168     1,788  
                   
  $ 147,431   $218,973    $  136,243    $180,035  
                   

   BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC 
   December 31 
   2010   2009 
   Assets  Liabilities   Assets   Liabilities 

Employee benefits

  $62,215   $517    $61,863    $477  

Property and equipment

       194,572          132,413  

Deferred financing costs

   1,682    140     1,906     2,989  

Intangible assets and other

   321    12,957     224     13,522  

Net operating loss

   56,897         59,456       

Alternative minimum tax

   4,847                

Reserves

   4,027         4,011       

Inventories

   10,488         4,163       

Unearned income

                 21,860  

State income tax adjustments

   3,265    213     2,344     213  

Valuation allowance

   (890              

Other

   4,521    1,767     3,168     1,763  
                   
  $  147,373   $  210,166    $  137,135    $173,237  
                   

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had the following deferred tax balances on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (dollars in thousands):

   Boise Inc. 
   As of December 31 
   2010  2009 

Current deferred tax assets (liabilities), net

  $16,658   $(11,539

Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities, net

   (88,200  (32,253
         

Total deferred tax liabilities, net

  $  (71,542 $  (43,792
         

81


     BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC 
     As of December 31 
     2010   2009 

Current deferred tax assets (liabilities), net

    $16,658    $(11,539

Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities, net

     (79,451   (24,563
            

Total deferred tax liabilities, net

    $(62,793  $(36,102
            

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. During the year ended December 31, 2010, Boise Inc. recorded a full valuation allowance on $0.9 million of deferred tax assets related to capital losses, because we do not expect to generate capital gains before these losses expire. During the year ended December 31, 2009, Boise Inc. released $44.1 million of valuation allowances recorded during the year ended December 31, 2008. During fourth quarter 2009, Boise Inc. determined that it was more likely than not that its deferred tax assets would be realized due to current-year income from continuing operations and that it would be able to utilize deferred tax assets to offset deferred tax liabilities. Therefore, Boise Inc. recognized the reversal of its entire valuation allowance as an income tax benefit from continuing operations. At December 31, 2008, Boise Inc. recorded $10.9 million of valuation allowances against income from continuing operations and $32.9 million and $0.3 million to “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” on its Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity against its pension liability and cash flow hedges, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, BZ Intermediate recorded a full valuation allowance on $0.9 million of deferred tax assets related to capital losses, because we do not expect to generate capital gains before these losses expire. During the year ended December 31, 2009, BZ Intermediate released $45.7 million of valuation allowances recorded during the year ended December 31, 2008. During fourth quarter 2009, BZ Intermediate determined that it was more likely than not that its deferred tax assets would be realized due to current-year income from continuing operations and that it would be able to utilize deferred tax assets to offset deferred tax liabilities. Therefore, BZ Intermediate recognized the reversal of its entire valuation allowance as an income tax benefit from continuing operations. At December 31, 2008, BZ Intermediate recorded $12.5 million of valuation allowance against income from continuing operations and $32.9 million and $0.3 million to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which was included in “Business unit equity” on its Consolidated Balance Sheets, against its pension liability and cash flow hedges, respectively.

Pretax income (loss) from domestic and foreign sources is as follows (dollars in thousands):

   Boise Inc. 
   Year Ended December 31 
   2010   2009   2008 

Domestic

  $108,095    $181,843    $(54,306

Foreign

   11     9     11  
               

Pretax income (loss)

  $  108,106    $  181,852    $  (54,295
               

   BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC 
   Year Ended December 31 
   2010   2009   2008 

Domestic

  $108,095    $168,161    $(47,720

Foreign

   11     9     11  
               

Pretax income (loss)

  $  108,106    $  168,170    $  (47,709
               

82


At December 31, 2010 and 2009, our foreign subsidiaries had no undistributed earnings that had been indefinitely reinvested.

Uncertain Income Tax Positions

Both Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate recognize tax liabilities and adjust these liabilities when their judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available or as new uncertainties occur.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate increased their unrecognized tax benefit by $87.6 million, which was charged to income tax expense, by excluding the alternative fuel mixture credits from income for tax purposes. If subsequently recognized, this unrecognized tax benefit would reduce Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate tax expense $83.3 million and $83.2 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Exclusion of the alternative fuel mixture credits increased our deferred tax liabilities $11.8 million for Boise Inc., or $12.0 million for BZ Intermediate, for the year ended December 31, 2010, and related primarily to the timing of our recognition of the credit. Exclusion of the alternative fuel mixture credits generated a deferred tax benefit of $82.9 million for Boise Inc., or $82.8 million for BZ Intermediate, for the year ended December 31, 2009 (primarily a net operating loss carryforward).

A reconciliation of the unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (dollars in thousands):

   Boise Inc. 
   2010  2009 

Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year

  $87,838   $256  

Gross increases related to prior-period tax positions

   169    11  

Gross decrease related to prior-period tax positions

   (529    

Gross increases related to current-period tax positions

   107    87,571  

Settlements

         
         

Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year

  $87,585   $87,838  
         
   BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC 
   2010  2009 

Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year

  $87,820   $256  

Gross increases related to prior-period tax positions

   166    11  

Gross decrease related to prior-period tax positions

   (529    

Gross increases related to current-period tax positions

   107    87,553  

Settlements

         
         

Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year

  $87,564   $87,820  
         

The December 31, 2010, unrecognized tax benefit net of federal benefit for state taxes for Boise Inc. is $83.5 million. Of this amount, $71.2 million is recorded as a credit to long-term deferred taxes to eliminate the benefit associated with the uncertain tax position. The remaining $12.3 million is recorded in “Other long-term liabilities” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The December 31, 2010, unrecognized tax benefit net of federal benefit for state taxes for BZ Intermediate is $83.4 million. Of this amount, $70.8 million is recorded as a credit to long-term deferred taxes to eliminate the benefit associated with the uncertain tax position. The remaining $12.6 million is recorded in “Other long-term liabilities” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

83


Additional guidance may be issued by the IRS in the next 12 months, which could cause us to change our unrecognized tax benefits from the amounts currently recorded. It is not reasonably possible to know to what extent the total amounts of unrecognized benefits will increase or decrease within the next 12 months.

Both Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in their Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). Interest expense related to uncertain tax positions was nominal for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008. We did not record any penalties associated with our uncertain tax positions during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 for Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate.

We file federal income tax returns in the U.S. and state income tax returns in various state jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities. BZ Intermediate is a wholly owned, consolidated entity of Boise Inc., and its tax return is filed under the consolidated tax return of Boise Inc. Open tax years for Boise Inc. are 2010, 2009, 2008, and 2007.

7.    Leases

We lease our distribution centers, as well as other property and equipment, under operating leases. During the Predecessor period presented, the Predecessor leased its distribution centers, as well as other property and equipment, under operating leases. For purposes of determining straight-line rent expense, the lease term is calculated from the date of possession of the facility, including any periods of free rent and any renewal option periods that are reasonably assured of being exercised. Straight-line rent expense is also adjusted to reflect any allowances or reimbursements provided by the lessor. We do not have any sublease rental income for the periods presented below. Accordingly, our future minimum lease payment requirements have not been reduced by sublease rental income. Rental expense for operating leases is as follows (dollars in thousands):

   Boise Inc.      Predecessor 
   Year Ended December 31      January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
 
  2010   2009   2008      
 

Rental expense

  $  15,267    $  16,357    $  13,523      $2,044  

For noncancelable operating leases with remaining terms of more than one year, the minimum lease payment requirements are as follows (dollars in thousands):

   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016 &
Thereafter
 

Minimum payment

  $  11,656    $  10,860    $  8,460    $  6,992    $  6,771    $12,813  

Substantially all lease agreements have fixed payment terms based on the passage of time. Some lease agreements provide us with the option to purchase the leased property. Additionally, some agreements contain renewal options averaging six years, with fixed payment terms similar to those in the original lease agreements.

8.    Concentrations of Risk

Sales to OfficeMax represent a concentration in the volume of business transacted and in revenue generated from these transactions. Sales to OfficeMax were $504.2 million, $545.4 million, and $494.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, representing 24%,

84


28%, and 24% of total sales for those periods. For the period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, the Predecessor sales to OfficeMax were $90.1 million and are included in “Sales, Related parties” in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). During the Predecessor period, sales to OfficeMax represented 25% of sales. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $30.3 million and $34.7 million, respectively, of accounts receivable due from OfficeMax. No other single customer accounted for 10% or more of consolidated trade sales or of total sales.

9.    Intangible Assets

Intangible assets represent primarily the values assigned to trademarks and trade names, customer relationships, and technology. Customer relationships are amortized over approximately ten years, and technology is amortized over approximately five years. Trademarks and trade names are not amortized.

The gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization, and net carrying amount as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, were as follows (dollars in thousands):

   Year Ended December 31, 2010 
   Gross Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net Carrying
Amount
 

Trademarks and trade names

  $16,800    $   $16,800  

Customer relationships

   13,700     (3,882  9,818  

Technology and other

   6,895     (3,908  2,987  
              
  $37,395    $(7,790 $29,605  
              

   Year Ended December 31, 2009 
   Gross Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net Carrying
Amount
 

Trademarks and trade names

  $16,800    $   $16,800  

Customer relationships

   13,700     (2,512  11,188  

Technology and other

   6,895     (2,525  4,370  
              
  $37,395    $(5,037 $32,358  
              

The following table sets forth our intangible asset amortization for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, and for the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008 (dollars in thousands):

   Boise Inc.  Predecessor 
   2010   2009  2008  January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
 

Intangible asset amortization

  $  2,754    $  2,752   $  2,285   $  

Our estimated future intangible asset amortization expense is as follows (dollars in thousands):

   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016 

Amortization expense

  $  2,754    $  2,744    $  1,599    $  1,370    $  1,370    $  1,370  

We did not have any triggering events during 2010; therefore, we performed our annual impairment assessment for our indefinite-lived assets for all of our segments during fourth quarter 2010. Based on the results of our testing, we have concluded that our indefinite-lived intangible

85


assets were not impaired. We also performed an undiscounted cash flow analysis during fourth quarter 2010 and determined that the value of our long-lived assets was not impaired. We also evaluated the remaining useful lives of our customer relationships and technology and determined that no adjustments to the useful lives were necessary.

10.    Asset Retirement Obligations

We accrue for asset retirement obligations in the period in which they are incurred if sufficient information is available to reasonably estimate the fair value of the obligation. When we record the liability, we capitalize the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its settlement value, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Occasionally, we become aware of events or circumstances that require us to revise our future estimated cash flows. When revisions become necessary, we recalculate our obligation and adjust our asset and liability accounts utilizing appropriate discount rates. Upon settlement of the liability, we will recognize a gain or loss for any difference between the settlement amount and the liability recorded.

At both December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $10.4 million of asset retirement obligations recorded primarily in “Other long-term liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These liabilities related primarily to landfill closure and closed-site monitoring costs. These liabilities are based on the best estimate of costs and are updated periodically to reflect current technology, laws and regulations, inflation, and other economic factors. During 2009, our estimated future cash flows for retirement obligations relating to items at two of our mills were reduced as a result of discussions with third-party organizations. These changes reduced our expected asset retirement obligations. No assets are legally restricted for purposes of settling asset retirement obligations. The table below describes changes to the asset retirement obligations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):

   December 31 
   2010  2009 

Asset retirement obligation at beginning of period

  $  10,362   $  14,283  

Liabilities incurred

   172      

Accretion expense

   754    1,165  

Payments

   (12  (122

Revisions in estimated cash flows

   (873  (4,964
         

Asset retirement obligation at end of period

  $10,403   $10,362  
         

We have additional asset retirement obligations with indeterminate settlement dates. The fair value of these asset retirement obligations cannot be estimated due to the lack of sufficient information to estimate the settlement dates of the obligations. These asset retirement obligations include, for example, (i) removal and disposal of potentially hazardous materials related to equipment and/or an operating facility if the equipment and/or facilities were to undergo major maintenance, renovation, or demolition; (ii) wastewater treatment ponds that may be required to be drained and/or cleaned if the related operating facility is closed; and (iii) storage sites or owned facilities for which removal and/or disposal of chemicals and other related materials are required if the operating facility is closed. We will recognize a liability in the period in which sufficient information becomes available to reasonably estimate the fair value of these obligations.

86


11.    Debt

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, our long-term debt and the interest rates on that debt were as follows (dollars in thousands):

   December 31, 2010  December 31, 2009 
   Amount  Interest Rate  Amount  Interest Rate 

Revolving credit facility, due 2013

  $     $    

Tranche A term loan, due 2013

   181,831    3.06   203,706    3.25 

Tranche B term loan, due 2014

           312,221    5.75 

9% senior notes, due 2017

   300,000    9.00   300,000    9.00 

8% senior notes, due 2020

   300,000    8.00         

Current portion of long-term debt

   (43,750  3.06   (30,711  3.97 
           

Long-term debt, less current portion

   738,081    7.48   785,216    6.41 

Current portion of long-term debt

   43,750    3.06   30,711    3.97 
           
  $781,831    7.24 $815,927    6.32
           

As of December 31, 2010, Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate’s debt consisted of the following:

The Revolving Credit Facility: A five-year nonamortizing $250.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility with interest at either the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus an applicable margin, which is currently 275 basis points, or a calculated base rate plus an applicable margin, which is currently 175 basis points (collectively with the Tranche A term loan facility, the Credit Facilities).

The Tranche A Term Loan Facility: A five-year amortizing senior secured loan facility with interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin, which is currently 275 basis points, or a calculated base rate plus an applicable margin, which is currently 175 basis points. The Tranche A term loan facility was originally issued at $250.0 million. At December 31, 2009, our LIBOR applicable margin was 300 basis points, and our calculated base rate applicable margin was 200 basis points.

The 9% Senior Notes: An eight-year nonamortizing $300.0 million senior unsecured debt obligation with annual interest at 9%.

The 8% Senior Notes: A ten-year nonamortizing $300.0 million senior unsecured debt obligation with annual interest at 8%.

The Credit Facilities are secured by a first-priority lien on all of the assets of our subsidiaries that guarantee or are borrowers, and in the event of default, the lenders could terminate their commitments, declare the Credit Facilities, including interest and fees, due and payable, or enforce liens and security interests to collect outstanding amounts due under the Credit Facilities. All borrowings under the Credit Facilities bear interest at a rate per annum equal to an applicable margin plus a calculated base rate or adjusted Eurodollar rate. The calculated base rate means, for any day, a rate per annum equal to the greater of (i) the Prime Rate in effect on such day and (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate in effect on such day plus 0.50%. The adjusted Eurodollar rate means LIBOR rounded to the nearest 1/16 of 1.0% and adjusted for any applicable reserve requirements. In addition to paying interest, we pay a commitment fee to the lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility at a rate of 0.375% per annum times the daily average undrawn portion of the Revolving Credit Facility (reduced by the amount of letters of credit issued and outstanding), which fee is payable quarterly in arrears. We also pay letter of credit fees of 275 basis points times the average daily maximum outstanding amount of the letters of credit and a fronting fee of 15 basis points to the issuing bank of outstanding letters of credit. These fees are payable quarterly and in arrears.

87


At December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009, we had no borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the average interest rates for our borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility were zero and 3.7%, respectively. The minimum and maximum borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility were zero for the year ended December 31, 2010, and zero and $60.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The weighted average amount of borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, were zero and $8.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2010, we had availability of $245.4 million, which is net of outstanding letters of credit of $4.6 million. At December 31, 2009, we had availability of $227.8 million, which was net of outstanding letters of credit of $22.2 million.

Debt Refinancing Activities

2010

On October20, 2010, we entered into a Second Amendment to Credit and Guaranty Agreement, which amended various terms of our Credit Facilities. This amendment allows us to make various types of restricted payments, including the payment of dividends, the repurchase of our stock and warrants, and the repayment or repurchase of our senior notes. We paid a special dividend of $0.40 per common share on December 3, 2010, to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 17, 2010. See Note 14, Stockholders’ Equity and Capital, for further information. These restricted payments are limited to a permitted restricted payment amount, which is calculated as the sum of 50% of our net income for distributions together with other amounts, all as described in the amendment. In addition, the amendment eliminates any ongoing requirement that we use our excess cash flow to repay debt.

On March 19, 2010, Boise Paper Holdings and Boise Co-Issuer Company (together, the 8% Senior Notes Issuers), two of our wholly owned indirect subsidiaries, issued a $300 million aggregate principal amount of 8% senior notes due on April 1, 2020 (the 8% Senior Notes) through a private placement that was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

In connection with the issuance of the 8% Senior Notes, the 8% Senior Notes Issuers and BZ Intermediate, a wholly owned consolidated entity of Boise Inc. and the parent company of Boise Paper Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries (together the 8% Senior Notes Guarantors) entered into the 8% Senior Notes Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2010. The 8% Senior Notes Registration Rights Agreement required us to register under the Securities Act the 8% Senior Notes due in 2020 (the 8% Exchange Notes) having substantially identical terms to the 8% Senior Notes and to complete an exchange of the privately placed 8% Senior Notes for the publicly registered 8% Exchange Notes. We completed the public registration of the 8% Exchange Notes in June 2010, and in July 2010, we completed an exchange of the privately placed 8% Senior Notes for the publicly registered 8% Exchange Notes having substantially identical terms.

Following the sale of the 8% Senior Notes in March 2010, we used the net proceeds of the sale, as well as cash on hand, to repay the Tranche B term loan facility plus accrued and unpaid interest at par. Upon the repayment of all of the indebtedness outstanding under the Tranche B term loan facility, such debt was canceled.

The issuance of the 8% Senior Notes and the repayment of our Tranche B term loan facility represented a substantial modification to our debt structure. Therefore, we wrote off $22.2 million of previously unamortized deferred financing costs for the Tranche B term loan facility in “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). We recorded $12.0 million of new deferred financing costs related to the March 2010 debt refinancing.

The 8% Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all of the Issuers’ present and future senior indebtedness, senior to all of their future subordinated indebtedness, and

88


effectively subordinated to all of our present and future senior secured indebtedness (including all borrowings with respect to the Credit Facilities to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness). The 8% Senior Notes pay interest semiannually in arrears on April 1 and October 1, commencing on October 1, 2010.

2009

On October 26, 2009, Boise Paper Holdings and Boise Finance Company (together, the 9% Senior Notes Issuers), two of our wholly owned indirect subsidiaries, issued a $300 million aggregate principal amount of 9% senior notes due on November 1, 2017 (the 9% Senior Notes) through a private placement that was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

In connection with the issuance of the 9% Senior Notes, the 9% Senior Notes Issuers and BZ Intermediate, a wholly owned consolidated entity of Boise Inc. and the parent company of Boise Paper Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries (together the 9% Senior Notes Guarantors) entered into the 9% Senior Notes Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2009. The 9% Senior Notes Registration Rights Agreement required us to register under the Securities Act the 9% Senior Notes due in 2017 (the 9% Exchange Notes) having substantially identical terms to the 9% Senior Notes and to complete an exchange of the privately placed 9% Senior Notes for the publicly registered 9% Exchange Notes. We completed the public registration of the 9% Exchange Notes in June 2010, and in July 2010, we completed an exchange of the privately placed 9% Senior Notes for the publicly registered 9% Exchange Notes having substantially identical terms.

Following the sale of the 9% Senior Notes, the 9% Senior Notes Issuers used the net proceeds of the sale, as well as cash on hand, to retire a portion of the existing term loan indebtedness under Boise Paper Holdings’ Credit Facilities pursuant to the amendments of our Credit Facilities (Credit Agreement Amendments). The Credit Agreement Amendments became effective October 26, 2009, at which time Boise Paper Holdings repaid approximately $75 million of outstanding secured debt under its first lien term loan. Boise Paper Holdings used proceeds of the issuance to repurchase, in its entirety, the indebtedness outstanding under its second lien term loan. In consideration of the repurchase of indebtedness under the second lien term loan, Boise Paper Holdings paid a premium of 113% to the lender parties, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Upon the repurchase of all of the indebtedness outstanding under the second lien term loan, such debt was canceled, and the second lien credit agreement was terminated.

On October 26, 2009, Boise Inc. also used cash on hand to repurchase, in its entirety, the outstanding 15.75% note payable due in 2015 that was held by it and not by BZ Intermediate. Boise Inc. purchased the note payable at a purchase price of 70% of the outstanding value of the note payable, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Following the purchase of the note payable, the note was canceled.

The issuance of the 9% Senior Notes and the repurchase of our second lien term loan represented a substantial modification to our debt structure. Therefore, we wrote off the unamortized deferred financing costs for the second lien and recognized various other costs and fees incurred in connection with these transactions in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). We also recorded $13.2 million of deferred financing costs related to the debt restructuring.

We recognized $44.1 million for Boise Inc. and $66.8 million for BZ Intermediate in “Loss on extinguishment of debt,” which consisted of a $27.1 million write-off of second lien deferred financing costs, a $33.9 million premium paid to second lien holders, $5.8 million of other costs and fees, and for Boise Inc., a $22.7 million gain on the repurchase of the notes payable.

The 9% Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all of the Issuers’ present and future senior indebtedness, senior to all of their future subordinated indebtedness, and effectively subordinated to all of our present and future senior secured indebtedness (including all

89


borrowings with respect to the Credit Facilities to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness). The 9% Senior Notes pay interest semiannually in arrears on May 1 and November 1, commencing on May 1, 2010.

Covenants

The Credit Facilities require BZ Intermediate and its subsidiaries to maintain financial covenant ratios. We are required to have a total leverage ratio of less than 4.75:1.00, stepping down to 4.50:1.00 at September 30, 2011, and a secured leverage ratio of 3.25:1.00, stepping down to 3.00:1.00 at September 30, 2011, and we are required to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio of 2.50:1.00. The total leverage ratio is defined in our loan agreement at the end of any fiscal quarter as the ratio of (i) consolidated total net debt as defined in our Credit Facilities debt agreement as of such day to (ii) consolidated adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) for the four-fiscal-quarter period ending on such date. The Credit Facilities secured leverage ratio is defined in our First Amendment to our loan agreement as the ratio as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of (i) consolidated first lien secured total net debt as defined in our credit agreement amendments as of such day to (ii) consolidated adjusted EBITDA for the four-fiscal-quarter period ending on such date. The interest coverage ratio is defined in our loan agreement at the end of any fiscal quarter as the ratio of (i) consolidated adjusted EBITDA for the four-fiscal-quarter period then ended to (ii) consolidated interest expense payable in cash for such four-fiscal-quarter period. The Credit Facilities also limit the ability of BZ Intermediate and its subsidiaries to make capital expenditures, generally to $150 million per year.

The 9% and 8% Senior Notes indenture agreements contain covenants which, subject to certain exceptions, limit the ability of the 9% and 8% Senior Notes Issuers and the 9% and 8% Senior Notes Guarantors to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, engage in certain asset sales, make certain types of restricted payments, engage in transactions with affiliates, and create liens on assets of the 9% and 8% Senior Notes Issuers or 9% and 8% Senior Notes Guarantors. Upon a change of control, the 9% and 8% Senior Notes Issuers must offer to repurchase the 9% and 8% Senior Notes at 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the 9% and 8% Senior Notes Issuers sell certain assets and do not use the proceeds heldfrom such sales for specified purposes, they must offer to repurchase the 9% and 8% Senior Notes at 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Guarantees

Our obligations under our Credit Facilities are guaranteed by each of Boise Paper Holdings’ existing and subsequently acquired domestic subsidiaries (collectively, the Credit Facility Guarantors). The Credit Facilities are secured by a first-priority security interest in substantially all of the real, personal, and mixed property of Boise Paper Holdings and the Credit Facility Guarantors, including 100% of the equity interests of Boise Paper Holdings and each domestic subsidiary of Boise Paper Holdings, 65% of the equity interests of each of Boise Paper Holdings’ foreign subsidiaries (other than Boise Hong Kong Limited so long as Boise Hong Kong Limited does not account for more than $2.5 million of consolidated EBITDA during any fiscal year of Boise Paper Holdings), and all intercompany debt.

The 9% and 8% Senior Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by BZ Intermediate and each existing and future subsidiary of BZ Intermediate (other than their respective issuers). The 9% and 8% Senior Notes Guarantors do not include Louisiana Timber Procurement Company, L.L.C., or foreign subsidiaries.

Prepayments

We may redeem all or a portion of the 9% Senior Notes at any time on or after November 1, 2013, at a premium decreasing to zero by November 1, 2015, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In

90


addition, prior to November 1, 2012, the 9% Senior Notes Issuers may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 9% Senior Notes at a redemption price of 109% of the principal amount thereof with the net proceeds of one or more qualified equity offerings.

We may redeem all or a portion of the 8% Senior Notes at any time on or after April 1, 2015, at a premium decreasing to zero by April 1, 2018, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, prior to April 1, 2013, the 8% Senior Notes Issuers may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 8% Senior Notes at a redemption price of 108% of the principal amount thereof with the net proceeds of one or more qualified equity offerings.

Other Provisions

Subject to specified exceptions, the Credit Facilities require that the proceeds from certain asset sales, casualty insurance, and certain debt issuances must be used to pay down outstanding borrowings. As of December 31, 2010, required debt principal repayments total as follows (dollars in thousands):

   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015-2016   Thereafter 

Required debt principal repayments

  $ 43,750    $ 129,688    $ 8,393    $    $    $600,000  

Other

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $30.4 million and $47.4 million, respectively, of costs recorded in “Deferred financing costs” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. As noted above, we repaid the Tranche B term loan facility with the proceeds from the March 2010 debt refinancing, and as a result, we expensed approximately $22.2 million of previously unamortized deferred financing costs. We recorded this charge in “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in our Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss). In addition, $12.0 million of new deferred financing costs related to the debt refinancing are included, net of amortization, in “Deferred financing costs” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The amortization of these costs is recorded in interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the loans. In “Interest expense” in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss), we recorded $6.8 million and $11.3 million of amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, cash payments for interest were $51.6 million and $56.9 million, respectively.

12.    Financial Instruments

We are exposed to market risks, including changes in interest rates and energy prices.

Interest Rate Risk — Debt

With the exception of the Credit Facilities, our debt is fixed-rate debt. At December 31, 2010, the estimated value of our fixed- and variable-rate debt was approximately $63.6 million more than and $1.9 million less than the amount recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet, respectively. The fair value of long-term debt is estimated based on quoted market prices for our debt and the discounted value of our expected future cash payments.

We use interest rate derivative instruments to hedge a portion of our interest rate risk. We have derivatives in place with a cap rate of 5% on a notional amount of $300 million through the period ending March 31, 2011. Initially, some of our derivatives were designated and qualified as cash flow hedging instruments utilizing critical terms match. Effective December 31, 2008, we changed our interest rate election from utilizing LIBOR to utilizing the calculated base rate. As the interest rate on our debt no longer matched the rate on the interest rate derivatives used to hedge a portion of our

91


debt, we began accounting for the interest rate derivative instruments as economic hedges. The amounts recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2008, have been amortized to interest expense. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives have been recorded in “Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives” in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). The table below summarizes the impact on the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) of the instruments for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 (dollars in thousands):

   Year Ending December 31 
   2010  2009   2008 

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives (a)

  $    (43 $    568    $    (479

Amortization of premiums paid pertaining to interest rate derivatives (b)

   120    746     617  

Amortization of amounts within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to interest rate derivatives (b)

   422    338       

(a)Recorded in “Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives” in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).

(b)Recorded as part of “Interest expense” in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the fair value of the interest rate derivatives was nominal.

Energy Risk

We enter into transactions to hedge the variable cash flow risk of natural gas purchases. At December 31, 2010, these derivatives included three-way collars, call spreads, and swaps. As of December 31, 2010, we had entered into derivative instruments related to the following approximate percentages of our forecasted natural gas purchases:

  January 2011
Through
March 2011
 April 2011
Through
October 2011
 November 2011
Through
March 2012
 April 2012
Through
October 2012
 November 2012
Through

March 2013

Approximate percent hedged

 82% 45% 26% 22% 5%

We have elected to account for these instruments as economic hedges. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we recorded the fair value of the derivatives, or $2.1million and $1.4 million, respectively, in “Accrued liabilities, Other” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, we recorded the change in fair value of the instruments, or $0.6million of expense, $5.9 million of income, and $7.4 million of expense, in “Materials, labor, and other operating expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).

Predecessor

During the Predecessor periods presented, Boise Cascade occasionally used interest rate swaps to hedge variable interest rate risk. Because debt and interest costs were not allocated to the Predecessor, the effects of the interest rate swaps were not included in the Predecessor consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value Measurements

We record certain of our financial assets and liabilities, which consist of short-term investments and derivative financial instruments that are used to hedge exposures to interest rate and energy risks, at fair value. The fair value hierarchy under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) gives the highest priority to quoted market prices (Level 1) and the lowest priority to

92


unobservable inputs (Level 3). In general, and where applicable, we use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities to determine fair value (Level 1). If quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities are not available to determine fair value, we use quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2). If quoted prices for identical or similar assets are not available or are unobservable, we may use internally developed valuation models, whose inputs include bid prices and third-party valuations utilizing underlying asset assumptions (Level 3). We enter into our hedges with large financial institutions, and we monitor credit ratings to consider the impact, if any, to the determination of fair value. No significant adjustments were made in any periods presented.

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, fair value for these financial instruments was determined based on applicable interest rates such as LIBOR, interest rate curves, and NYMEX price quotations under the terms of the contracts, using current market information as of the reporting date. Our certificates of deposit, interest rate derivatives, and energy derivatives are valued using third-party valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities. The following table provides a summary of our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the inputs used to develop these estimated fair values under the fair value hierarchy discussed above (dollars in thousands):

   Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2010, Using:
 
   Total   Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 
Assets:        

Certificates of deposit (a)

  $10,621    $    $10,621    $  

Interest rate derivatives (b)

                    
                    
  $ 10,621    $    $10,621    $  
                    

Liabilities:

        
                    

Energy derivatives (c)

  $2,056    $    $2,056    $  
                    

   Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2009, Using:
 
   Total   Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
 
Assets:        

Certificates of deposit (a)

  $10,023    $    $10,023    $  

Interest rate derivatives (b)

   163          163       
                    
  $ 10,186    $    $10,186    $  
                    

Liabilities:

        
                    

Energy derivatives (c)

  $1,447    $    $1,447    $  
                    

(a)Recorded in “Short-term investments” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(b)Recorded in “Other assets” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(c)Recorded in “Accrued liabilities, Other” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

93


Tabular Disclosure of the Fair Values of Derivative Instruments and the Effect of Those Instruments(dollars in thousands)

   Fair Values of Derivative Instruments 
   Asset Derivatives   Liability Derivatives 
   December 31, 2010 
   Balance
Sheet
Location
   Fair
Value
   Balance
Sheet
Location
   Fair
Value
 

Derivatives designated as economic hedging instruments (a)

        

Natural gas contracts

   Other assets    $     Accrued liabilities    $2,056  
              

Total derivatives

    $      $  2,056  
              

   Fair Values of Derivative Instruments 
   Asset Derivatives   Liability Derivatives 
   December 31, 2009 
   Balance
Sheet
Location
   Fair
Value
   Balance
Sheet
Location
   Fair
Value
 

Derivatives designated as economic hedging instruments (a)

        

Interest rate contracts

   Other assets    $163     Accrued liabilities    $  

Natural gas contracts

   Other assets          Accrued liabilities     1,447  
              

Total derivatives

    $  163      $  1,447  
              

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss) for the Year Ended

December 31, 2010

 

Derivatives
Designated
as Cash

Flow
Hedging
Instruments (b)

 Amount of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized in
OCI on Derivative
(Effective Portion)
  

Location of Gain
or (Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
Into Income
(Effective Portion)

 Amount of Gain
or (Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
Into Income
(Effective Portion)
  

Derivatives
Designated
as Economic
Hedging
Instruments (a)

 

Location of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative

 Amount of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
 

Interest rate contracts

 $   

Interest expense

 $(422 

Interest rate contracts

 

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

 $(43
    

Natural gas contracts

 

Materials, labor, and other operating expenses

  (609
               
 $    $(422   $(652
               

94


The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss) for the Year Ended

December 31, 2009

 

Derivatives
Designated
as Cash

Flow
Hedging
Instruments (b)

 Amount of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized in
OCI on Derivative
(Effective
Portion)
  

Location of Gain
or (Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
Into Income
(Effective Portion)

 Amount of Gain
or (Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
Into Income
(Effective Portion)
  

Derivatives
Designated
as Economic
Hedging
Instruments (a)

 

Location of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative

 Amount of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
 

Interest rate contracts

 $   

Interest expense

 $(338 

Interest rate contracts

 

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

 $568  
    

Natural gas contracts

 

Materials, labor, and other operating expenses

  5,877  
               
 $    $(338   $6,445  
               

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss) for the Year Ended

December 31, 2008

 

Derivatives
Designated
as Cash

Flow
Hedging
Instruments (b)

 Amount of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized in
OCI on Derivative
(Effective Portion)
  

Location of Gain
or (Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
Into Income
(Effective Portion)

 Amount of Gain
or (Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
Into Income
(Effective Portion)
  

Derivatives
Designated
as Economic
Hedging
Instruments (a)

 

Location of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative

 Amount of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
 

Interest rate contracts

 $(760 

Interest expense

 $   

Interest rate contracts

 

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

 $(479
    

Natural gas contracts

 

Materials, labor, and other operating expenses

  (7,445
               
 $(760  $     $(7,924
               

(a)See discussion above for additional information on our purpose for entering into derivatives designated as economic hedges and our overall risk management strategies.

(b)As of January 1, 2009, we no longer have interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. The amounts recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet have been amortized to interest expense. During the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, these derivatives were accounted for as economic hedges.

13.    Retirement and Benefit Plans

Some of our employees participate in noncontributory defined benefit pension plans, contributory defined contribution savings plans, deferred compensation plans, and postretirement healthcare benefit plans.

Defined Benefit Plans

Some of our employees participate in noncontributory defined benefit pension plans that were either transferred to us or spun off from Boise Cascade. The salaried defined benefit pension plan is available only to employees who were formerly employed by OfficeMax (known at the time as Boise Cascade Corporation) before November 2003. The pension benefit for salaried employees is based primarily on the employees’ years of service and highest five-year average compensation. The benefit for hourly employees is based on a fixed amount per year of service. Expenses attributable to

95


participation in noncontributory defined benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, and the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, were $9.7 million, $8.7 million, $8.3 million, and $1.8 million, respectively.

In December 2008, we amended our defined benefit pension plan for salaried employees (the Salaried Plan). This amendment froze the accumulation of benefits and years of service for participants of the Salaried Plan effective April 15, 2009. This amendment also froze benefits in the Boise Inc. Supplemental Plan (SUPP) and the Boise Inc. Supplemental Early Retirement Plan for Executive Officers (SERP). Because the Salaried Plan had unrecognized losses, the curtailment gain associated with this amendment was applied to partially offset those losses. However, we recognized a $2.9 million gain on our SUPP and SERP plans, because the curtailment gain exceeded our existing unrecognized losses. This gain was recognized in “Other (income) expense, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Defined Contribution Plans

Some of our employees participate in contributory defined contribution savings plans, which cover most of our salaried and hourly employees. Expenses related to matching contributions attributable to participation in contributory defined contribution savings plans for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, and the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, were $12.0 million, $10.0 million, $8.4 million, and $2.1 million, respectively. Salaried employees hired after October 31, 2003, who are otherwise eligible to participate in these plans are eligible for additional discretionary company matching contributions based on a percentage approved each plan year. Beginning April 16, 2009, the company contributions for eligible salaried employees consisted of a nondiscretionary, nonmatching base contribution of 3% of eligible compensation plus a matching contribution. In addition, the Company may make additional discretionary nonmatching contributions each year. The company contribution structure for hourly employees varies.

Deferred Compensation Plans

Some of our employees participate in deferred compensation plans, in which key managers and nonaffiliated directors may irrevocably elect to defer a portion of their base salary and bonus or director’s fees until termination of employment or beyond. A participant’s account is credited with imputed interest at a rate equal to 130% of Moody’s composite average of yields on corporate bonds. In addition, participants other than directors may elect to receive their company contributions in the deferred compensation plan in lieu of any company contribution in the contributory defined contribution savings plan. The deferred compensation plans are unfunded; therefore, benefits are paid from general assets of the Company. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $1.8 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of liabilities attributable to participation in our deferred compensation plan on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Postretirement Benefit Plans

Some of our and the Predecessor’s employees participated in Boise Cascade’s postretirement healthcare benefit plans. The type of retiree healthcare benefits and the extent of coverage vary based on employee classification, date of retirement, location, and other factors. All of the postretirement healthcare plans are unfunded. The postretirement benefit plans have a December 31 measurement date.

96


Obligations and Funded Status of Postretirement Benefits and Pensions

The following table, which includes only company-sponsored plans, reconciles the beginning and ending balances of our projected benefit obligations for our pension benefits and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for our other benefits. It also shows the fair value of plan assets and aggregate funded status of our plans. The funded status changes from year to year based on the investment return from plan assets, contributions, and benefit payments and the discount rate used to measure the liability (dollars in thousands):

   Pension Benefits  Other Benefits 
   2010  2009  2010  2009 

Change in benefit obligation

     

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

  $423,962   $396,692   $772   $2,490  

Service cost

   5,041    6,891    3    4  

Interest cost

   25,272    24,314    32    47  

Amendments

       145          

Actuarial (gain) loss

   34,636    9,138    (69  (1,725

Closure and curtailment gain

   345              

Liabilities transferred

           (63    

Benefits paid

   (14,212  (13,218  (1  (44
                 

Benefit obligation at end of year

  $    475,044   $    423,962   $    674   $772  
                 

Change in plan assets

     

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

  $301,522   $248,084   $   $  

Actual return on plan assets

   43,417    54,358          

Employer contributions

   25,174    12,298          

Benefits paid

   (14,212  (13,218        
                 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  $355,901   $301,522   $   $  
                 

Over (under) funded status

  $(119,143 $(122,440 $(674 $(772
                 

Amounts recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheet

     

Current liabilities

  $(254 $(143 $(142 $(182

Noncurrent liabilities

   (118,889  (122,297  (532  (590
                 

Net amount recognized

  $(119,143 $(122,440 $(674 $(772
                 

Amounts recognized in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” (pretax) in Boise Inc.’s Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity or BZ Intermediate’s Consolidated Statement of Capital consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

   Pension Benefits   Other Benefits 
   2010   2009   2010  2009 

Net (gain) loss

  $75,021    $62,334    $(275 $(413

Prior service cost

   422     473           
                   

Net amount recognized

  $ 75,443    $ 62,807    $(275 $(413
                   

The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $475.0 million and $423.8 million as of December 31, 2010 and 2009. All of our defined benefit pension plans have accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets.

97


Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss

The components of net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive (income) loss (pretax) are as follows (dollars in thousands):

  Pension Benefits  Other Benefits 
  Boise Inc.  Predecessor  Boise Inc.  Predecessor 
  Year Ended
December 31
  January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
  Year Ended
December 31
  January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
 
 2010  2009  2008   2010  2009  2008  

Service cost

 $5,041   $6,891   $9,226   $1,566   $3   $4   $3   $  

Interest cost

  25,272    24,314    20,881    3,458    32    47    98    18  

Expected return on plan assets

  (23,242  (23,269  (20,398  (3,452                

Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss

  1,774    315        (21  (150  (1,344      (12

Amortization of prior service costs and other

  51    36        194                  

Plan settlement curtailment (gain) loss

  345        (1,749                    
                                

Company-sponsored plans

  9,241    8,287    7,960    1,745    (115  (1,293  101    6  

Multiemployer plans

  411    382    327    75                  
                                

Net periodic benefit costs

 $9,652   $8,669   $8,287   $1,820   $  (115 $(1,293 $  101   $6  
                                

Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss

        

Net (gain) loss

 $14,461   $(21,951 $84,600   $   $(12 $(1,715 $(42 $  

Prior service cost

      145    364                      

Amortization of actuarial gain (loss)

  (1,774  (315                        

Amortization of prior service cost

  (51  (36          150    1,344          
                                

Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss

  12,636    (22,157  84,964        138    (371  (42    
                                

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive (income) loss

 $22,288   $  (13,488 $93,251   $1,820   $23   $  (1,664 $59   $6  
                                

In 2011, we estimate net periodic pension expense will be $12.6 million. The 2011 net periodic pension expense will include $5.6 million of net loss and $0.1 million of prior service cost that will be amortized from “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” on Boise Inc.’s Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity or BZ Intermediate’s Consolidated Statement of Capital.

Assumptions

The assumptions used in accounting for the plans are estimates of factors that will determine, among other things, the amount and timing of future benefit payments. The following table presents the assumptions used in the measurement of our benefits obligation:

   Pension Benefits  Other Benefits 
   December 31  February 22,
2008
  December 31  February 22,
2008
 
   2010  2009  2008   2010  2009  2008  

Weighted average:

         

Discount rate

   5.50  6.10  6.20  6.50  4.20  4.60  5.70  5.50

Rate of compensation increase

       4.25  4.25        

The following table presents the assumptions used in the measurement of net periodic benefit cost:

   Pension Benefits  Other Benefits 
   Boise Inc.  Predecessor  Boise Inc.  Predecessor 
   Year Ended
December 31
  January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
  Year Ended
December 31
  January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
 
  2010  2009  2008   2010  2009  2008  

Weighted average assumptions as of the last day in the presented period:

         

Discount rate

   6.10  6.20  6.50  6.40  4.60  5.70  5.70  5.50

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

   7.25  7.25  7.25  7.25        

Rate of compensation increase

       4.25  4.25        

98


Discount Rate Assumption.    The discount rate reflects the current rate at which the pension obligations could be settled on the measurement date — December 31. In all periods presented, the discount rate assumption was determined using a spot rate yield curve constructed to replicate Aa-graded corporate bonds. The Aa-graded bonds included in the yield curve reflect anticipated investments that would be made to match the expected monthly benefit payments over time and do not include all Aa-graded corporate bonds. The plan’s projected cash flows were duration-matched to this yield curve to develop an appropriate discount rate.

Asset Return Assumption.    The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was based on a weighted average of the expected returns for the major investment asset classes. Expected returns for the asset classes are based on long-term historical returns, inflation expectations, forecasted gross domestic product, earnings growth, and other economic factors. The weights assigned to each asset class were based on the investment strategy. The weighted average expected return on plan assets we will use in our calculation of 2011 net periodic benefit cost is 7.25%. In 2010, plan assets performed well above the long-term return assumption.

Rate of Compensation Increases.    Salaried pension benefits are frozen, so the compensation increase assumption is not applicable. Negotiated compensation increases are reflected in the projected benefit obligation for certain hourly employees with salary-related benefits. Historically, this assumption reflected long-term actual experience, the near-term outlook, and assumed inflation.

The following table presents our assumed healthcare cost trend rates at December 31, 2010 and 2009:

   2010  2009 

Weighted average assumptions:

   

Healthcare cost trend rate assumed for next year

   8.10  8.50

Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)

   6.50  6.50

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

   2025   2025 

Assumed healthcare cost trend rates affect the amounts reported for the healthcare plans. At December 31, 2010, a one-percentage-point change in our assumed healthcare cost trend rate would not significantly affect our total service or interest costs or our postretirement benefit obligation.

Investment Policies and Strategies

At December 31, 2010, 51% of our pension plan assets were invested in equity securities, 48% were invested in fixed-income securities, and 1% were invested in private equity, cash, and other. The general investment objective for all of our plan assets is to optimize growth of the pension plan trust assets, while minimizing the risk of significant losses in order to enable the plans to satisfy their benefit payment obligations over time. The objectives take into account the long-term nature of the benefit obligations, the liquidity needs of the plans, and the expected risk/return trade-offs of the asset classes in which the plans may choose to invest. The Retirement Funds Investment Committee is responsible for establishing and overseeing the implementation of our investment policy. Russell Investments (Russell) oversees the active management of our pension investments in order to achieve broad diversification in a cost-effective manner. At December 31, 2010, our investment policy governing our relationship with Russell allocated 48% to long-duration fixed-income securities, 33% to U.S. equity securities, 14% to international equity securities, and 5% to private equity securities. Our arrangement with Russell requires monthly rebalancing to the policy targets noted above.

Investment securities, in general, are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate, credit, and overall market volatility risk, all of which are subject to change. Due to the level of risk associated

99


with certain investment securities, it is reasonably possible that changes in the values of investment securities will occur in the near term, and such changes could materially affect the reported amounts.

Fair Value Measurements of Plan Assets

The defined benefit plans hold an interest in the Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Master Pension Trust Account will only be(Master Trust). The assets in the Master Trust are invested in a commingled trust whose funds are invested in U.S. “governmentequities, international equities, and fixed-income securities” defined managed by Russell Trust Company. The Master Trust also invests in private equity securities managed by Pantheon Ventures Inc.

The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the pension plan assets, by major asset category, at fair value at December 31, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):

   December 31, 2010 
   Quoted Prices
in Active
Market for
Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2) (a)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
   Total 

Equity securities:

        

Large cap U.S. equity securities (b)

  $    $112,602    $    $112,602  

Small- and mid-cap U.S. equity securities (c)

        21,021          21,021  

International equity securities (d)

        49,172          49,172  

Fixed-income securities (e)

        169,992          169,992  

Private equity securities (f)

             2,225     2,225  
                    

Total securities at fair value

        352,787     2,225     355,012  
                    

Receivables and accruals, net

         889  
           

Total fair value of plan assets

        $ 355,901  
           

   December 31, 2009 
   Quoted Prices
in Active
Market for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2) (a)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   Total 

Equity securities:

        

Large cap U.S. equity securities (b)

  $    $99,614    $    $99,614  

Small- and mid-cap U.S. equity securities (c)

        21,262          21,262  

International equity securities (d)

        35,861          35,861  

Fixed-income securities (e)

        144,011          144,011  
                    

Total securities at fair value

        300,748          300,748  
                    

Receivables and accruals, net

         774  
           

Total fair value of plan assets

        $ 301,522  
           

100


(a)Investments are mutual funds managed by Russell Trust Company. The funds are valued at the net asset value (NAV) provided by Russell Trust Company, the administrator of the funds. The NAV is based on the value of the assets owned by the fund, less liabilities at year-end. While the underlying assets are actively traded on an exchange, the funds are not.

(b)Our investments in this category are invested in the Russell Equity I Fund. The fund seeks higher long-term returns that exceed the Russell 1000 Index by investing in common stocks that rank among the largest 1,000 companies in the U.S. stock market.

(c)Our investments in this category are invested in the Russell Equity II Fund. The fund seeks high, long-term returns that exceed the Russell 2500 Index by investing in the smaller capitalization stocks of the U.S. stock market.

(d)Our investments in this category are invested in the Russell International Fund with Active Currency at December 31, 2010, and were invested in the Russell International Fund in 2009. Both funds benchmark against the MSCI European, Australasia, and Far East (EAFE) Index and seek high, long-term returns comparable to the broad international stock market by investing in non-U.S. companies from the developed countries around the world. The funds participate primarily in the stock markets of Europe and the Pacific Rim. The Russell International Fund with Active Currency places additional emphasis on opportunistically adding value through active investment in foreign currencies.

(e)Our investments in this category are invested in the Russell Long Duration Fixed Income Fund (Long Duration Fund) and Russell Long Credit Fixed Income Fund (Long Credit Fund). The Long Duration Fund seeks to achieve above-average consistency in performance relative to the Barclays Capital U.S. Long Government/Credit Bond Index by combining manager styles and strategies with different payoffs over various phases of an investment cycle. The Long Credit Fund seeks to achieve above-average consistency in performance relative to the Barclays Capital Long Credit Index and is used with other bond funds, such as the Long Duration Fund, to gain additional credit exposure to asset portfolios. Both funds are designed to provide maximum total return through diversified strategies, including sector rotation, modest interest rate timing, security selection, and tactical use of high-yield and emerging markets bonds.

(f)Our investments in this category are invested in the Pantheon Global Secondary Fund IV, LP. The fund specializes in investments in the private equity secondary market and occasionally directly in private companies to maximize capital growth. Fund investments are carried at fair value as determined quarterly using the market approach to estimate the fair value of private investments. The market approach utilizes prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions, type of security, size of the position, degree of liquidity, restrictions on the disposition, latest round of financing data, current financial position, and operating results, among other factors. In circumstances where fair values are not provided with respect to any of the company’s fund investments, the investment advisor will seek to determine the fair value of such investments based on information provided by the general partners or managers of such funds or from other sources. Notwithstanding the above, the variety of valuation bases adopted and quality of management data of the ultimate underlying investee companies means that there are inherent difficulties in determining the value of the investments. Amounts realized on the sale of these investments may differ from the calculated values.

The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the pension plan’s Level 3 assets for the period ended December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

   Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 

Balance, beginning of year

  $  

Purchases

   2,205  

Unrealized gain

   20  
     

Balance, end of year

  $2,225  
     

Cash Flows

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, our pension assets had a market value of $356 million and $302 million, respectively. Assuming a rate of return on plan assets of 7.25% in 2011 and 2012, we estimate that we will be required to contribute approximately $3 million in 2011 and approximately $32 million in 2012. The amount of required contributions will depend, among other things, on actual returns on plan assets, changes in interest rates that affect our discount rate assumptions, changes in pension funding requirement laws, and modifications to our plans. Our estimates may change materially depending upon the impact of these and other factors. Changes in the financial markets

101


may require us to make larger than previously anticipated contributions to our pension plans. We may also elect to make additional voluntary contributions in any year, which could reduce the amount of required contributions in future years. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we made $25.0 million of cash contributions to our qualified pension plans. Additionally, we made certain benefit payments to our nonqualified pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans totaling $0.6 million.

The following benefit payments (dollars in thousands), which reflect expected future service as any Treasury Bill issuedappropriate, are expected to be paid. Qualified pension benefit payments are paid from plan assets, while nonqualified pension and other benefit payments are paid by the United States havingCompany.

   Pension Benefits   Other Benefits 

2011

  $16,840    $125  

2012

   19,299     88  

2013

   21,554     76  

2014

   23,919     71  

2015

   26,012     56  

Years 2016-2020

   158,784     138  

14.     Stockholders’ Equity and Capital

Boise Inc.

Preferred Stock.    We are authorized to issue 1.0 million shares of preferred stock with such designations, voting, and other rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the board of directors. No shares were issued or outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Common Stock.    We are authorized to issue 250.0 million shares of common stock, of which 84.8 million shares were issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010. Of these shares outstanding, 4.2 million shares were restricted stock (discussed below). At December 31, 2009, we had 84.4 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding, of which 6.5 million shares were restricted stock. The common stock outstanding does not include restricted stock units.

On February 5, 2008, stockholders owning 12.5 million shares exercised their conversion rights and voted against the Acquisition. Such stockholders were entitled to receive their per-share interest in the proceeds from our initial public offering, which had been held in trust. Of these 12.5 million shares, 12.3 million shares were presented for conversion. The remaining shares not presented remain outstanding. In connection with the Acquisition, we paid $120.2 million from our cash held in trust to these stockholders. The remaining cash held in trust was used to effect the Acquisition.

Warrants.    In connection with our public offering in June 2007, we issued 41.4 million units (the Units). Each Unit consists of one share of our common stock and one Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the Warrants). Each Warrant entitled the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $7.50 and expires on June 18, 2011. We may redeem the Warrants, at a maturityprice of 180$0.01 per Warrant, upon 30 days’ notice while the Warrants are exercisable, only in the event that the last sale price of the common stock is at least $14.25 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading-day period ending on the third day prior to the date on which notice of redemption is given.

Simultaneously with the consummation of our public offering, our then chairman and our chief executive officer each privately purchased 1.5 million warrants for an aggregate total of 3.0 million warrants (the Insider Warrants) at $1.00 per warrant (for an aggregate purchase price of $3.0 million). The amount paid for the Insider Warrants approximated fair value on the date of issuance. All of the proceeds received from these purchases were placed in cash held in trust. The Insider

102


Warrants purchased were identical to the Warrants underlying the Units issued in the public offering, except that the Insider Warrants may not be called for redemption and may be exercisable on a “cashless basis,” at the holder’s option, so long as such securities are held by such purchaser or less. Thus,his affiliates. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, 44.3 million and 44.4 million warrants were outstanding. At December 31, 2010, 2.3 million of the Company isoriginal Insider Warrants continued to be held by insiders. If all outstanding warrants were exercised at the $7.50 exercise price, we would receive cash proceeds of approximately $315 million.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units.    We evaluate share-based compensation for awards granted under the Boise Inc. Incentive and Performance Plan (the Plan) on a quarterly basis based on our estimate of expected restricted stock forfeiture, review of recent forfeiture activity, and expected future turnover. We recognize the effect of adjusting the forfeiture rate for all expense amortization in the period that we change the forfeiture estimate. The effect of forfeiture adjustments during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, was zero.

In April 2009, our stockholders approved a Plan Amendment that increased the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan from 5.2 million to 17.2 million.

Service-Condition Vesting Awards.    In March 2010, pursuant to the Plan, we granted 0.2 million shares of restricted stock to our nonemployee directors. The shares will vest fully on March 15, 2011. Any shares not vested on or before March 15, 2011, will be forfeited.

In March 2009, pursuant to the Plan, we granted to directors and members of management 4.6 million shares of restricted stock and 1.2 million restricted stock units (collectively restricted stock). The 2.0 million shares of restricted stock granted to the directors vested on March 15, 2010. The grants to members of management vested or will vest as follows: one-fifth on March 15, 2010, one-fifth on March 15, 2011, and three-fifths on March 15, 2012. Any shares not vested on or before March 15, 2012, will be forfeited.

In May 2008, directors and members of management were granted awards of 0.4 million and 0.8 million shares, respectively, of restricted stock subject to service-condition vesting. The restricted stock granted to directors vested on March 2, 2009. Additionally, one-third of the management grants subject to service-condition vesting restrictions also vested on March 2, 2009. The remaining grants subject to service-condition vesting restrictions vested equally on February 28, 2010, and February 28, 2011. Any shares not vested on or before February 28, 2011, were forfeited.

Market-Condition Vesting Awards.    In May 2008, members of management were granted restricted stock subject to market-based vesting restrictions tied to our stock price. These shares did not vest and were forfeited on March 1, 2011.

Compensation Expense.    We recognize compensation expense for the restricted stock based on the fair value on the date of the grant, as described below. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period for the restricted stock grants that vest over time and ratably over the award period for the restricted stock grants that vest based on the closing price of Boise Inc. stock, as discussed above. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, we recognized $3.7 million, $3.5 million, and $3.1 million, respectively, of compensation expense. Most of these costs were recorded in “General and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss).

Fair Value Measurement.    The fair value of service-condition restricted stock is determined based on the number of shares or units granted and the quoted price of our stock at the date of grant and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The fair value on the date of grant was $5.46 per share for the 2010 restricted stock grant, $0.43 per share for the 2009 restricted stock grant, and $4.16 per share for the 2008 grant. Compensation expense is adjusted if the service condition is not met.

103


Market-based restrictions represent a more difficult threshold to meet before payout, with greater uncertainty that the market riskcondition will be satisfied; these awards have a lower fair value than those that vest based primarily throughon the passage of time. However, compensation expense is required to be recognized for these awards regardless of when, if ever, the market condition is satisfied. We determined the fair value on the date of grant of the market-condition awards based on the stock price of Boise Inc. at $10 per share and $12.50 per share to be approximately $2.03 per share and $1.57 per share, respectively. The fair value of market-condition restricted stock or units was estimated at the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation. We assumed a risk-free rate of 2.59%, an expected stock volatility of 58.60%, and a stock price for Boise Inc.’s common shares of $4.16 per share. The $4.16-per-share value was based on Boise Inc.’s closing stock price on the date of grant. Expense was recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period.

The following summarizes the activity of our outstanding service- and market-condition restricted stock and units awarded under the Plan as of December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, and changes during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 (number of shares and aggregate fair value in thousands):

  Service-Condition Vesting Awards  Market-Condition Vesting Awards 
  Number of
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
  Aggregate
Fair Value
  Number of
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
   Aggregate
Fair Value
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2008

     $   $       $    $  

Granted

  1,185    4.16    4,927    1,929    1.75     3,368  

Vested (a)

  (30  4.16    (125             

Forfeited

  (12  4.16    (48  (13  1.75     (23
                   

Outstanding at December 31, 2008 (b)

  1,143   $4.16   $4,754    1,916   $1.75    $3,345  
                   

Granted

  5,841    0.43    2,512               

Vested (a)

  (604  4.16    (2,511             

Forfeited

  (49  1.27    (63  (32  1.75     (56
                   

Outstanding at December 31, 2009 (b)

  6,331   $0.74   $4,692    1,884   $1.75    $3,289  
                   

Granted

  250    5.81    1,450               

Vested (a)

  (3,009  0.77    (2,304  (4  1.75     (7

Forfeited

  (43  4.26    (180  (2  1.75     (3
                   

Outstanding at December 31, 2010 (b) (c)

  3,529   $1.04   $3,658    1,878   $1.75    $3,279  
                   

(a)We repurchase for cash any fractional shares as they vest. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, we repurchased 25.22 shares, 24.33 shares, and no shares, respectively.

(b)Outstanding awards included all nonvested and nonforfeited awards

(c)The weighted average remaining contractual term is approximately 1.3 years for the service-condition awards and 0.3 years for the market-condition awards as of December 31, 2010.

104


At December 31, 2010, we had approximately $1.4 million and $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the nonvested service- and market-condition restricted stock grants, respectively, under the Plan. The total compensation cost for the grants is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.7 years and 3.0 years for the service- and market-condition awards, respectively, based on the original grant date. Unrecognized compensation expense is calculated net of estimated forfeitures. The table below shows compensation expense recognized during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, both in total and broken out between service- and market-condition awards (dollars in thousands):

   Year Ended December 31 
   2010   2009   2008 

Total compensation expense

  $    3,733    $    3,517    $    3,096  

Relates to grant-date fair value of service-condition awards vested through period end

   2,663     2,440     2,198  

Relates to market-condition awards

   1,070     1,077     898  

The net income tax benefit associated with restricted stock awards was $0.8 million, $0.3 million, and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.

Dividends.    Our ability to pay dividends continues to be restricted by our Credit Facilities, as amended, and by Delaware law and state regulatory authorities. Under Delaware law, our board of directors may not authorize payment of a dividend unless it is either paid out of our capital surplus, as calculated in accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law, or if we do not have a surplus, it is paid out of our net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. Under our Credit Facilities, as amended, a dividend may now be paid if it does not exceed our permitted restricted payment amount, which is calculated as the sum of 50% of our net income for distributions together with other amounts as specified in the amended Credit Facilities. To the extent we do not have adequate surplus or net profits, we will be prohibited from paying dividends.

We paid a special cash dividend of $0.40 per common share on December 3, 2010, to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 17, 2010. The total dividend payout was approximately $32.3 million.

105


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) includes the following (dollars in thousands):

   Investment
Gains
(Losses)
  Cash
Flow
Hedges
  Unfunded Accumulated
Benefit Obligation
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
     
    Actuarial
Loss (a)
  Prior Service
Cost (a)
  

Balance at December 31, 2007, net of taxes

  $   $   $   $   $  
                     

Current-period changes, before taxes

       (760  (84,558  (364  (85,682

Reclassifications to earnings, before taxes

                     

Income taxes

                     
                     

Balance at December 31, 2008, net of taxes

  $   $(760 $(84,558 $(364 $(85,682
                     

Current-period changes, before taxes

   (5      23,665    (145  23,515  

Reclassifications to earnings, before taxes

       338    (1,029  36    (655

Income taxes

       (131  (8,656  56    (8,731
                     

Balance at December 31, 2009, net of taxes

  $(5 $(553 $(70,578 $(417 $(71,553
                     

Current-period changes, before taxes

   6        (14,449      (14,443

Reclassifications to earnings, before taxes

       422    1,625    51    2,098  

Income taxes

       131    4,964    (19  5,076  
                     

Balance at December 31, 2010, net of taxes

  $1   $   $ (78,438 $(385 $(78,822
                     

(a)The 2011 net periodic pension expense will include $5.6 million of net loss and $0.1 million of prior service cost that will be amortized from “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” on Boise Inc.’s Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity or BZ Intermediate’s Consolidated Statement of Capital.

BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

BZ Intermediate has authorized 1,000 voting common units issued outstanding at December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, with a par value of $0.01. All of these units have been issued to Boise Inc. BZ Intermediate refers to its capital as “Business unit equity” on its Consolidated Balance Sheets, and this represents its equity transactions with Boise Inc., net income (loss) from the operations of its subsidiaries, the effect of changes in other comprehensive income, and restricted stock. Share-based compensation costs in BZ Intermediate’s financial statements represent expenses for restricted stock of Boise Inc., which have been pushed down to BZ Intermediate for accounting purposes and are explained in more detail above.

Predecessor

During the Predecessor period presented, equity compensation was granted to the Predecessor’s employees under Boise Cascade’s equity compensation plans. During the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, the Predecessor recognized $0.2 million of compensation expense, most of which was recorded in “General and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).

15.    Alternative Fuel Mixture Credits, Net

The U.S. Internal Revenue Code allowed an excise tax credit for taxpayers using alternative fuels in the taxpayer’s trade or business. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded $207.6 million in “Alternative fuel mixture credits, net” in our Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss). As of December 31, 2009, we recorded a receivable of $56.6 million in “Receivables, Other”

106


on our Consolidated Balance Sheet for alternative fuel mixture credits. We received this credit in March 2010 after we filed our 2009 federal income tax return. Eligibility for new credits expired on December 31, 2009.

In mid October 2010, the Internal Revenue Service Office of Chief Counsel released a memo providing further clarification on the cellulosic biofuel producer credit (CBPC). This guidance clarifies that companies may elect to apply for the $1.01-per-gallon CBPC for any black liquor that was produced in 2009 and not claimed as alternative fuel mixture credits. We became eligible for the alternative fuel mixture credit at our mills at varying dates throughout first quarter 2009 and would be eligible to claim the CBPC credit for black liquor produced prior to becoming eligible for the alternative fuel mixture credits. However, this credit is taxable, may only be used to offset a portion of taxable income, and has a relatively short carry-forward period. We continue to evaluate the impact of filing for the CBPC on our specific tax situation.

16.    St. Helens Mill Restructuring

In November 2008, we announced the restructuring of our paper mill in St. Helens, Oregon. The restructuring was primarily the result of declining product demand coupled with continuing high costs.

For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, we recorded a pretax charge of $0.2 million, $5.8 million, and $29.8 million, respectively, associated with the restructuring in “St. Helens mill restructuring” in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). Additionally in 2008, we recognized $7.8 million related to the write-down of inventory, which was recorded in “Materials, labor, and other operating expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). All of these costs are recorded in our Paper segment. In the future, net cash expenditures in decommissioning and other costs are not expected to be material. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $0.1 million and $0.5 million of severance liabilities included in “Accrued liabilities, Compensation and benefits” on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

17.    Acquisition of Boise Cascade’s Paper and Packaging Operations

On February 22, 2008, Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. completed the Acquisition of the Paper Group and other assets and liabilities related to the operation of the paper, packaging and newsprint, and transportation businesses of the Paper Group and part of the headquarters operations of Boise Cascade for cash and securities. Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. acquired four pulp and paper mills, one paper mill, five corrugated container plants, a corrugated sheet feeder plant, and two paper distribution facilities, all located in the U.S. Subsequent to the Acquisition, Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. changed its name to Boise Inc.

107


The purchase price was paid with cash, the issuance of shares of our common stock, and a note payable. These costs, including direct transaction costs and purchase price adjustments, are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

   February 22,
2008
 

Cash paid to Boise Cascade

  $1,252,281  

Cash paid to Boise Cascade for financing and other fees

   24,915  

Less: cash contributed by Boise Cascade

   (38,000
     

Net cash

   1,239,196  
     

Equity at $9.15 average price per share

   346,395  

Lack of marketability discount

   (41,567
     

Total equity

   304,828  
     

Note payable to Boise Cascade at closing

   41,000  

Working capital adjustment

   17,334  
     

Total note payable to Boise Cascade

   58,334  
     

Fees and expenses

   61,785  
     

Total purchase price

  $1,664,143  
     

The following table summarizes the fair value allocation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Acquisition as adjusted (dollars in thousands):

   February 22,
2008,

Fair Value
 

Current assets

  $571,936 

Property and equipment

   1,306,070 

Fiber farms and deposits

   11,006 

Intangible assets:

  

Trademarks and trade names

   16,800 

Customer list

   13,700 

Technology

   6,860 

Deferred financing costs

   81,898 

Other long-term assets

   4,465 

Current liabilities

   (246,928

Long-term liabilities

   (101,664
     

Total purchase price

  $1,664,143  
     

Upon completion of the transaction, Boise Cascade owned 37.9 million, or 49%, of our outstanding shares. In early March 2010, Boise Cascade sold all of its remaining interest ratesin us.

18.    Segment Information

Boise Inc., headquartered in Boise, Idaho, operates and reports its business in three reportable segments: Paper, Packaging, and Corporate and Other (support services). These segments represent distinct businesses that are managed separately because of differing products and services. Each of these businesses requires distinct operating and marketing strategies. Management reviews the performance of the Company based on government securities,these segments.

108


Paper.    We manufacture and sell a range of papers, including communication-based papers, packaging-demand-driven papers, and market pulp. Many of these paper products are commodity products, while others have specialized features that make these products premium and specialty grades. Our premium grades include 100% recycled, high-bright, and colored cut-size office papers, and our specialty grades include custom-developed papers for such uses as label and release and flexible papers used for food wrap and other applications. We ship to customers both directly from our mills and through distribution centers. In 2010, approximately 38% of our uncoated freesheet paper sales volume, including approximately 61% of our office papers sales volume, was sold to OfficeMax.

Packaging.    Our Packaging segment manufactures and sells corrugated packaging products, linerboard, and newsprint. Our containerboard and corrugated products are sold by our own sales personnel and by brokers. Our newsprint is sold by our own sales personnel primarily to newspaper publishers in the southern U.S.

Corporate and Other.    Our Corporate and Other segment includes primarily corporate support services, related assets and liabilities, and foreign exchange gains and losses. This segment also includes transportation assets, such as rail cars and trucks, which we use to transport our products from our manufacturing sites. We provide transportation services not only to our own facilities but also, on a limited basis, to third parties when geographic proximity and logistics are favorable. Rail cars and trucks are generally leased. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, and the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, segment sales related primarily to our rail and truck business were $65.4 million, $63.8 million, $67.7 million, and $8.5 million, respectively.

The segments’ profits and losses are measured on operating profits before change in fair value of interest rate derivatives, interest expense, and interest income. Specified expenses are allocated to the segments. For many of these allocated expenses, the related assets and liabilities remain in the Corporate and Other segment.

The segments follow the accounting principles described in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

Export sales to foreign unaffiliated customers were $212.2 million in 2010, $180.3 million in 2009, $212.8 million in 2008, and $40.8 million during the Predecessor period of January 1 through February 21, 2008, respectively. In all periods presented, net sales were generated domestically, and long-lived assets were held by domestic operations.

Segment sales to external customers by product line are as follows (dollars in millions):

   Boise Inc.  Predecessor 
   Year Ended December 31  January 1
Through
February 21,
2008
 
  2010   2009   2008  

Paper

        

Uncoated freesheet

  $  1,309.8    $  1,289.8    $  1,240.9   $224.2  

Containerboard (medium)

   0.1     0.1     0.2    0.1  

Market pulp and other

   84.7     73.5     101.9    20.1  
                   
   1,394.6     1,363.4     1,343.0    244.4  
                   
 

Packaging

        

Containerboard (linerboard)

   94.2     88.6     88.6    16.5  

Newsprint

   121.7     98.4     203.2    29.8  

Corrugated containers and sheets

   388.0     347.7     324.3    53.1  

Other

   65.3     51.2     84.3    13.7  
                   
   669.2     585.9     700.4    113.1  
                   
 

Corporate and Other

   30.0     28.9     27.2    2.4  
                   
  $2,093.8    $1,978.2    $2,070.6   $359.9  
                   

109


An analysis of our operations by segment is as follows (dollars in millions):

Boise Inc. 
  Sales  Income
(Loss)
Before
Taxes
  Depre-
ciation,
Amorti-
zation,
and
Depletion
  EBITDA (d)  Capital
Expendi-
tures
  Assets 
  Trade  Related
Parties
  Inter-
segment
  Total      

Year Ended December 31, 2010

         

Paper

 $1,394.6   $   $63.7   $1,458.3   $151.5   $87.4   $238.9   $67.8   $1,187.9  

Packaging

  636.2    33.0    2.7    671.9    65.0    38.6    103.6    38.6    505.6  

Corporate and Other

  27.3    2.7    35.4    65.4    (21.6)(a)   3.9    (17.7)(a)   5.2    245.5  
                                    
  2,058.1    35.7    101.8    2,195.6    194.9    129.9    324.8    111.6    1,939.0  
                                    

Intersegment eliminations

          (101.8  (101.8                    

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

                                    

Loss on extinguishment of debt

                  (22.2)(a)       (22.2)(a)         

Interest expense

                  (64.8                

Interest income

                  0.3                  
                                    
 $  2,058.1   $35.7   $   $  2,093.8   $108.1   $129.9   $302.6   $111.6   $  1,939.0  
                                    

  Sales  Income
(Loss)
Before
Taxes
  Depre-
ciation,
Amorti-
zation,
and
Depletion
  EBITDA (d)  Capital
Expendi-
tures
  Assets 
  Trade  Related
Parties
  Inter-
segment
  Total      

Year Ended December 31, 2009

         

Paper

 $  1,363.4   $   $56.6   $  1,420.0   $262.7(b)  $85.2   $347.8(b)  $51.0   $  1,249.8  

Packaging

  560.4    25.5    2.5    588.4    67.1(b)   42.2    109.3(b)   23.1    497.9  

Corporate and Other

  11.6    17.3    34.9    63.8    (21.5)(b)   4.1    (17.3)(b)   3.0    148.1  
                                    
  1,935.4    42.8    94.0    2,072.2    308.3    131.5    439.8    77.1    1,895.8  
                                    

Intersegment eliminations

          (94.0  (94.0                    

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

                  0.6                  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

                  (44.1)(b)       (44.1)(b)         

Interest expense

                  (83.3                

Interest income

                  0.4                  
                                    
 $1,935.4   $42.8   $   $1,978.2   $181.9   $131.5   $395.7   $77.1   $1,895.8  
                                    

Year Ended December 31, 2008

         

Paper

 $1,343.0   $   $60.7   $1,403.7   $32.7(c)  $71.7   $104.3(c)  $42.8   $1,310.4  

Packaging

  635.5    64.9    3.3    703.7    21.1(c)   35.1    56.2(c)   43.5    558.3  

Corporate and Other

  11.7    15.5    40.5    67.7    (18.6)(c)   3.2    (15.4)(c)   4.3    119.6  
                                    
  1,990.2    80.4    104.5    2,175.1    35.2    110.0    145.1    90.6    1,988.3  
                                    

Intersegment eliminations

          (104.5  (104.5                    

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

                  (0.5                

Interest expense

                  (91.2                

Interest income

                  2.2                  
                                    
 $1,990.2   $80.4   $   $2,070.6   $(54.3 $110.0   $145.1   $90.6   $1,988.3  
                                    

110


Predecessor 
   Sales  Income
(Loss)
Before
Taxes
  Depre-
ciation,
Amorti-
zation,
and
Depletion
   EBITDA (d)  Capital
Expendi-
tures
 
   Trade   Related
Parties
   Inter-
segment
  Total      

January 1 Through February 21, 2008

            

Paper

  $  154.4    $90.0    $9.1   $  253.5   $20.7   $0.3    $21.1   $5.0  

Packaging

   102.2     10.9     0.4    113.5    5.7    0.1     5.7    5.2  

Corporate and Other

   1.8     0.6     6.1    8.5    (3.2  0.1     (3.1    
                                    
   258.4     101.5     15.6    375.5    23.2    0.5     23.7    10.2  
                                    

Intersegment eliminations

             (15.6  (15.6                 

Interest income

                     0.2               
                                    
  $258.4    $101.5    $   $359.9   $23.4   $0.5    $23.7   $10.2  
                                    

(a)Included $22.2 million of expense recorded in the Corporate and Other segment associated with the refinancing of our debt.

(b)Included $5.8 million of expense recorded in the Paper segment associated with the restructuring of the St. Helens, Oregon, mill.

Included $5.9 million of income related to the impact of energy hedges, of which $4.8 million was recorded in the Paper segment and $1.1 million was recorded in the Packaging segment.

Included $149.9 million of income recorded in the Paper segment, $61.6 million of income recorded in the Packaging segment, and $3.9 million of expenses recorded in the Corporate and Other segment relating to alternative fuel mixture credits. These amounts are net of fees and expenses and before taxes.

Included $44.1 million of expense recorded in the Corporate and Other segment associated with the restructuring of our debt for Boise Inc. or $66.8 million of expense recorded in the Corporate and Other segment associated with the restructuring of our debt for BZ Intermediate. The difference is due to the gain recognized by Boise Inc. related to the notes payable, which were held by Boise Inc.

(c)Included $37.6 million of expense recorded in the Paper segment associated with the restructuring of the St. Helens, Oregon, mill.

Included $7.4 million of expense related to the impact of energy hedges, of which $6.1 million was recorded in the Paper segment and $1.3 million was recorded in the Packaging segment.

Included $5.5 million of expense recorded in the Packaging segment related to lost production and costs incurred as a result of Hurricanes Gustav and Ike.

Included $10.2 million related to inventory purchase accounting adjustments, of which $7.4 million was recorded in the Paper segment and $2.8 million was recorded in the Packaging segment.

Included $19.8 million of expense recorded in the Packaging segment related to the outage at the DeRidder, Louisiana, mill.

Included a $2.9 million gain on changes in supplemental pension plans recorded in the Corporate and Other segment.

(d)

EBITDA represents income (loss) before interest (interest expense, interest income, and change in fair value of interest rate derivatives), income tax provision (benefit), and depreciation, amortization, and depletion. EBITDA is the primary measure used by our chief operating decision makers to evaluate segment operating performance and to decide how to allocate resources to segments. We believe EBITDA is useful to investors because it provides a means to evaluate the operating performance of our segments and our company on an ongoing basis using criteria that are used by our internal decision makers and because it is frequently used by investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies with substantial financial leverage. We believe EBITDA is a meaningful measure because it presents a transparent view of our recurring operating performance and allows management to readily view operating trends, perform analytical comparisons, and identify strategies to improve operating performance. For example, we believe that the inclusion of items such as taxes, interest expense, and interest income distorts management’s ability to assess and view the core operating trends in our segments. EBITDA, however, is not a measure of our liquidity or financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and should not be considered as an alternative to

111


net income (loss), income (loss) from operations, or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP or as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity. The use of EBITDA instead of net income (loss) or segment income (loss) has limitations as an analytical tool, including the inability to determine profitability; the exclusion of interest expense, interest income, change in fair value of interest rate derivatives, and associated significant cash requirements; and the exclusion of depreciation, amortization, and depletion, which represent significant and unavoidable operating costs, given the level of our indebtedness and the capital expenditures needed to maintain our businesses. Management compensates for these limitations by relying on our GAAP results. Our measures of EBITDA are not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the methods of calculation.

The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA (dollars in millions):

   Boise Inc.     Predecessor 
   Year Ended December 31     January 1
Through
February 22,
2008
 
  2010  2009  2008     
 

Net income (loss)

  $62.7   $153.8   $(45.5   $22.8  

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

       (0.6  0.5        

Interest expense

   64.8    83.3    91.2        

Interest income

   (0.3  (0.4  (2.2    (0.2

Income tax provision (benefit)

   45.4    28.0    (8.8    0.6  

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

   129.9    131.5    110.0      0.5  
                   

EBITDA

  $ 302.6   $ 395.7   $ 145.1     $23.7  
                   
   BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC     Predecessor 
   Year Ended December 31     January 1
Through
February 22,
2008
 
     2010      2009      2008       
 

Net income (loss)

  $63.6   $147.8   $(41.9   $22.8  

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

       (0.6  0.5        

Interest expense

   64.8    74.3    82.9        

Interest income

   (0.3  (0.4  (0.6    (0.2

Income tax provision (benefit)

   44.5    20.4    (5.8    0.6  

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

   129.9    131.5    110.0      0.5  
                   

EBITDA

  $302.6   $373.0   $145.1     $23.7  
                   

19.    Commitments, Guarantees, and Legal Proceedings

Commitments

We have financial commitments for lease payments and for the purchase of wood fiber and utilities. In addition, we have other financial obligations that we enter into in the normal course of our business to purchase goods and services and to make capital improvements to our facilities.

Our log and fiber agreements are discussed further in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, our lease commitments are discussed further in Note 7, Leases, and our long-term debt obligations are discussed further in Note 11, Debt.

We enter into utility contracts for the purchase of electricity and natural gas. We also purchase these services under utility tariffs. The contractual and tariff arrangements include multiple-year commitments and minimum annual purchase requirements. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had approximately $27.2 million and $36.8 million, respectively, of utility purchase commitments. These payment obligations were valued at prices in effect on December 31, 2010 or 2009, respectively, or determined pursuant to contractual terms, if available. Because we consume the energy in the manufacture of our products, these obligations represent the face value of the contracts, not resale value.

112


Guarantees

We provide guarantees, indemnifications, and assurances to others in the normal course of our business. See Note 11, Debt, for a description of the guarantees, including the approximate terms of the guarantees, how the guarantees arose, the events or circumstances that would require us to perform under the guarantees, and the maximum potential undiscounted amounts of future payments we could be required to make.

Legal Proceedings

We are a party to routine proceedings that arise in the course of our business. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings or environmental claims that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity, either individually or in the aggregate.

20.    Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited, dollars in millions, except per-share and stock price information)

   Boise Inc. 
   2010 
   First
Quarter (a)
  Second
Quarter
   Third
Quarter
   Fourth
Quarter
 

Net sales

  $494.1   $521.6    $554.1    $524.0  

Income from operations

   18.6    38.2     77.0     60.2  

Net income (loss)

   (12.7  13.3     35.9     26.2  

Net income (loss) per common share:

       

Basic

   (0.16  0.17     0.45     0.32  

Diluted

   (0.16  0.16     0.43     0.31  

Common stock dividends per share

                 0.40  

Common stock prices (f)

   6.13    7.40     7.36     8.10  

High

   4.60    4.91     4.96     6.40  

Low

       
   Boise Inc. 
   2009 
   First
Quarter (b)
  Second
Quarter (c)
   Third
Quarter (d)
   Fourth
Quarter (e)
 

Net sales

  $500.3   $479.4    $508.3    $490.3  

Income from operations

   21.4    96.6     93.5     94.2  

Net income (loss)

   (0.9  50.9     48.2     55.7  

Net income (loss) per common share:

       

Basic

   (0.01  0.65     0.61     0.70  

Diluted

   (0.01  0.60     0.57     0.66  

Common stock dividends per share

                   

Common stock prices (f)

       

High

   0.75    2.47     5.40     6.29  

Low

   0.24    0.51     1.41     4.71  

113


   BZ Intermediate Holdings 
   2010 
   First
Quarter (a)
  Second
Quarter
   Third
Quarter
   Fourth
Quarter
 

Net sales

  $494.1   $521.6    $554.1    $524.0  

Income from operations

   18.6    38.2     77.0     60.2  

Net income (loss)

   (11.8  13.3     36.0     26.1  
   BZ Intermediate Holdings 
   2009 
   First
Quarter (b)
  Second
Quarter (c)
   Third
Quarter (d)
   Fourth
Quarter (e)
 

Net sales

  $500.3   $479.4    $508.3    $490.3  

Income from operations

   21.4    96.6     93.5     94.2  

Net income

   1.4    54.2     50.2     42.1  

(a)First quarter 2010 included $3.3 million of expense related to the impact of energy hedges, $2.8 million of which was recorded in the Paper segment and $0.5 million in the Packaging segment.

First quarter 2010 included $22.2 million of expense recorded in the Corporate and Other segment associated with the refinancing of our debt.

(b)First quarter 2009 included $3.6 million of expense recorded in the Paper segment associated with the restructuring of the St. Helens, Oregon, mill.

First quarter 2009 included $2.2 million of expense related to the impact of energy hedges, $1.8 million of which was recorded in the Paper segment and $0.4 million in the Packaging segment.

(c)Second quarter 2009 included $57.0 million of income recorded in the Paper segment, $19.9 million of income recorded in the Packaging segment, and $1.6 million of expenses recorded in the Corporate and Other segment relating to alternative fuel mixture credits. These amounts are net of fees and expenses and before taxes.

Second quarter 2009 included $1.1 million of expense recorded in the Paper segment associated with the restructuring of the St. Helens, Oregon, mill.

Second quarter 2009 included $3.5 million of income related to the impact of energy hedges, $2.8 million of which was recorded in the Paper segment and $0.7 million in the Packaging segment.

(d)Third quarter 2009 included $42.9 million of income recorded in the Paper segment, $19.4 million of income recorded in the Packaging segment, and $2.7 million of expenses recorded in the Corporate and Other segment relating to alternative fuel mixture credits. These amounts are net of fees and expenses and before taxes.

Third quarter 2009 included $1.4 million of expense recorded in the Paper segment associated with the restructuring of the St. Helens, Oregon, mill.

Third quarter 2009 included $3.6 million of income related to the impact of energy hedges, $2.9 million of which was recorded in the Paper segment and $0.7 million in the Packaging segment.

(e)Fourth quarter 2009 included $50.1 million of income recorded in the Paper segment, $22.2 million of income recorded in the Packaging segment, and $0.4 million of income recorded in the Corporate and Other segment relating to alternative fuel mixture credits. These amounts are net of fees and expenses and before taxes.

Fourth quarter 2009 included $44.1 million of loss on extinguishment of debt for Boise Inc., or $66.8 million of loss on extinguishment of debt for BZ Intermediate, as a result of the October 2009 debt restructuring. The difference is due to the gain recognized by Boise Inc. related to the notes payable, which were held by Boise Inc.

Fourth quarter 2009 included $1.0 million of income related to the impact of energy hedges, $0.9 million of which was recorded in the Paper segment and $0.1 million in the Packaging segment.

(f)Our common stock began trading on February 25, 2008, on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol BZ. Common stock prices are based on daily closing prices.

114


21.    Subsequent Events

On February 21, 2011, our wholly owned subsidiary, Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the Agreement) to purchase all of the outstanding stock of Tharco Packaging, Inc. (Tharco) for $200 million of cash consideration, subject to adjustments set forth in the Agreement. This acquisition, which closed on March 1, 2011, expands our presence in packaging markets; extends our geographical reach from the Pacific Northwest to California, Colorado, Arizona, and Georgia; and increases our containerboard integration to over 85% from approximately 70%. We obtained appropriate consents from our lenders to enable the acquisition under our Credit Facilities.

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, Tharco had total revenue of $261 million and income from operations of $18 million. The remaining disclosures required by GAAP for business combinations have not been made for the Tharco acquisition because the proceeds frominitial accounting for the acquisition has not been completed.

22.    Consolidating Guarantor and Nonguarantor Financial Information

Our 9% and 8% Senior Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by BZ Intermediate and each of its existing and future subsidiaries (other than: (i) the co-issuers, Boise Paper Holdings, Boise Co-Issuer Company, and Boise Finance Company; (ii) Louisiana Timber Procurement Company, L.L.C.; and (iii) our Offering have been investedforeign subsidiaries). The following consolidating financial statements present the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows of (i) BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC (parent); (ii) co-issuers; (iii) guarantor subsidiaries; (iv) nonguarantor subsidiaries; and (v) eliminations to arrive at the information on a consolidated basis.

115


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

Consolidating Statements of Income (Loss)

For the Year Ended December 31, 2010

(dollars in a short-term investment (namely,thousands)

  BZ
Intermediate
Holdings LLC
(Parent)
  Co-issuers  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Nonguarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Sales

      

Trade

 $   $11,994   $2,039,308   $6,830   $   $2,058,132  

Intercompany

              110,619    (110,619    

Related parties

      2,364    333    32,948        35,645  
                        
      14,358    2,039,641    150,397    (110,619  2,093,777  
                        

Costs and expenses

      

Materials, labor, and other operating expenses

      14,039    1,580,221    150,398    (110,619  1,634,039  

Fiber costs from related parties

          25,259            25,259  

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

      3,454    126,472            129,926  

Selling and distribution expenses

          57,873    234        58,107  

General and administrative expenses

      21,949    30,324            52,273  

St. Helens mill restructuring

          180            180  

Other (income) expense, net

      225    69    (261      33  
                        
      39,667    1,820,398    150,371    (110,619  1,899,817  
                        

Income (loss) from operations

      (25,309  219,243    26        193,960  
                        

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

      871    19            890  

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

      (43              (43

Loss on extinguishment of debt

      (22,225              (22,225

Interest expense

      (64,782              (64,782

Interest expense — intercompany

      (212      (16  228      

Interest income

      299    7            306  

Interest income — intercompany

      16    212        (228    
                        
      (86,076  238    (16      (85,854
                        

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in net income (loss) of affiliates

      (111,385  219,481    10        108,106  

Income tax (provision) benefit

      (43,187  (1,350  8        (44,529
                        

Income (loss) before equity in net income (loss) of affiliates

      (154,572  218,131    18        63,577  

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates

  63,577    218,149            (281,726    
                        

Net income (loss)

 $63,577   $63,577   $218,131   $18   $(281,726 $63,577  
                        

116


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

Consolidating Statements of Income (Loss)

For the Wells Fargo Advantage Prime Investment Money Market FundYear Ended December 31, 2009

(dollars in thousands)

  BZ
Intermediate
Holdings LLC
(Parent)
  Co-issuers  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Sales

      

Trade

 $   $   $1,930,526   $4,884   $   $1,935,410  

Intercompany

          5    90,906    (90,911    

Related parties

      14,966    2,317    25,499        42,782  
                        
      14,966    1,932,848    121,289    (90,911  1,978,192  
                        

Costs and expenses

      

Materials, labor, and other operating expenses

      14,080    1,551,756    121,289    (90,911  1,596,214  

Fiber costs from related parties

          36,858            36,858  

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

      3,583    127,917            131,500  

Selling and distribution expenses

          55,318    206        55,524  

General and administrative expenses

      18,286    31,964            50,250  

St. Helens mill restructuring

          5,805            5,805  

Alternative fuel mixture credits, net

      3,933    (211,540          (207,607

Other (income) expense, net

      695    3,540    (230      4,005  
                        
      40,577    1,601,618    121,265    (90,911  1,672,549  
                        

Income (loss) from operations

      (25,611  331,230    24        305,643  
                        

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

      1,529    1,110            2,639  

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

      568                568  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

      (66,784              (66,784

Interest expense

      (74,263              (74,263

Interest expense — tercompany

      (171      (15  186      

Interest income

      364    3            367  

Interest income — intercompany

      15    171        (186    
                        
      (138,742  1,284    (15      (137,473
                        

Income (loss) before income taxes

      (164,353  332,514    9        168,170  

Income tax (provision) benefit

      (19,546  (810          (20,356
                        

Income (loss) before equity in net income (loss) of affiliates

      (183,899  331,704    9        147,814  

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates

  147,814    331,713            (479,527    
                        

Net income (loss)

 $147,814   $147,814   $331,704   $9   $(479,527 $147,814  
                        

117


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and thenSubsidiaries

Consolidating Statements of Income (Loss)

For the Wells Fargo Treasury Plus Money Market Fund), our only material market risk exposure relates to fluctuationsYear Ended December 31, 2008

(dollars in interest rates. Given our limited riskthousands)

  BZ
Intermediate
Holdings LLC
(Parent)
  Co-issuers  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Sales

      

Trade

 $   $   $1,979,955   $10,252   $   $1,990,207  

Intercompany

          1    102,006    (102,007    

Related parties

      12,092    3,450    64,883        80,425  
                        
      12,092    1,983,406    177,141    (102,007  2,070,632  
                        

Costs and expenses

      

Materials, labor, and other operating expenses

      11,166    1,670,526    177,141    (102,007  1,756,826  

Fiber costs from related parties

          54,628            54,628  

Depreciation, amortization, and depletion

      2,707    107,281            109,988  

Selling and distribution expenses

          48,032    246        48,278  

General and administrative expenses

      18,450    15,868            34,318  

St. Helens mill restructuring

          29,780            29,780  

Other (income) expense, net

      (2,666  (36  (278      (2,980
                        
      29,657    1,926,079    177,109    (102,007  2,030,838  
                        

Income (loss) from operations

      (17,565  57,327    32        39,794  
                        

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

      (3,187  (1,509          (4,696

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

      (479              (479

Interest expense

      (82,945              (82,945

Interest expense — intercompany

      (136      (21  157      

Interest income

      611    6            617  

Interest income — intercompany

      21    136        (157    
                        
      (86,115  (1,367  (21      (87,503
                        

Income (loss) before income taxes

      (103,680  55,960    11        (47,709

Income tax (provision) benefit

      7,393    (1,542  (2      5,849  
                        

Income (loss) before equity in net income (loss) of affiliates

      (96,287  54,418    9        (41,860

Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates

  (41,860  54,427            (12,567    
                        

Net income (loss)

 $(41,860 $(41,860 $54,418   $9   $(12,567 $(41,860
                        

118


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

Consolidating Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010

(dollars in our exposure to money market funds, we do not viewthousands)

  BZ
Intermediate
Holdings LLC
(Parent)
  Co-issuers  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Nonguarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

ASSETS

      

Current

      

Cash and cash equivalents

 $   $166,410   $6   $417   $   $166,833  

Short-term investments

      10,621                10,621  

Receivables

      

Trade, less allowances

      1,004    187,502    82        188,588  

Intercompany

          2    1,634    (1,636    

Related parties

              1        1  

Other

      331    3,504    4        3,839  

Inventories

      15    261,456            261,471  

Deferred income taxes

      16,651        7        16,658  

Prepaid and other

      4,697    517            5,214  
                        
      199,729    452,987    2,145    (1,636  653,225  
                        

Property

      

Property and equipment, net

      5,952    1,193,083            1,199,035  

Fiber farms and deposits

          18,285            18,285  
                        
      5,952    1,211,368            1,217,320  
                        

Deferred financing costs

      30,396                30,396  

Intangible assets, net

          29,605            29,605  

Investments in affiliates

  655,332    1,479,253            (2,134,585    

Other assets

      5,175    3,269            8,444  
                        

Total assets

 $655,332   $  1,720,505   $  1,697,229   $2,145   $  (2,136,221 $  1,938,990  
                        

119


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

Consolidating Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 (continued)

(dollars in thousands)

  BZ
Intermediate
Holdings LLC
(Parent)
  Co-issuers  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Nonguarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

  

     

Current

      

Current portion of long-term debt

 $   $43,750   $   $   $   $43,750  

Income taxes payable

      (818  898    2        82  

Accounts payable

      

Trade

      13,513    163,710    1,700        178,923  

Intercompany

      2    1,634        (1,636    

Related parties

              291        291  

Accrued liabilities

      

Compensation and benefits

      23,081    31,493            54,574  

Interest payable

      10,535                10,535  

Other

      5,336    10,645    142        16,123  
                        
      95,399    208,380    2,135    (1,636  304,278  
                        

Debt

      

Long-term debt, less current portion

      738,081                738,081  
                        

Other

      

Deferred income taxes

      78,959    492            79,451  

Compensation and benefits

      121,318                121,318  

Other long-term liabilities

      31,416    9,114            40,530  
                        
      231,693    9,606            241,299  
                        

Commitments and contingent liabilities

  

    

Capital

      

Business unit equity

  655,332    655,332    1,479,243    10    (2,134,585  655,332  
                        

Total liabilities and capital

 $655,332   $ 1,720,505   $ 1,697,229   $2,145   $  (2,136,221 $  1,938,990  
                        

120


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

Consolidating Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009

(dollars in thousands)

  BZ
Intermediate
Holdings LLC
(Parent)
  Co-issuers  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Nonguarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

ASSETS

      

Current

      

Cash and cash equivalents

 $   $69,071   $33   $289   $   $69,393  

Short-term investments

      10,023                10,023  

Receivables

      

Trade, less allowances

          185,087    23        185,110  

Intercompany

              1,254    (1,254    

Related parties

      1,626        430        2,056  

Other

      828    61,581    1        62,410  

Inventories

      18    252,155            252,173  

Prepaid and other

      4,049    770            4,819  
                        
      85,615    499,626    1,997    (1,254  585,984  
                        

Property

      

Property and equipment, net

      6,408    1,199,271            1,205,679  

Fiber farms and deposits

          17,094            17,094  
                        
      6,408    1,216,365            1,222,773  
                        

Deferred financing costs

      47,369                47,369  

Intangible assets, net

          32,358            32,358  

Investments in affiliates

  628,590    1,522,807            (2,151,397    

Other assets

      4,106    3,200            7,306  
                        

Total assets

 $628,590   $  1,666,305   $  1,751,549   $1,997   $  (2,152,651 $  1,895,790  
                        

121


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

Consolidating Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009 (continued)

(dollars in thousands)

  BZ
Intermediate
Holdings LLC
(Parent)
  Co-issuers  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Nonguarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

  

     

Current

      

Current portion of long-term debt

 $   $30,711   $   $   $   $30,711  

Income taxes payable

      (2,058  2,296    2        240  

Accounts payable

      

Trade

      11,983    158,795    1,740        172,518  

Intercompany

          1,254        (1,254    

Related parties

      17    2,445    136        2,598  

Accrued liabilities

      

Compensation and benefits

      23,789    44,159            67,948  

Interest payable

      4,946                4,946  

Other

      13,558    10,058    119        23,735  
                        
      82,946    219,007    1,997    (1,254  302,696  
                        

Debt

      

Long-term debt, less current portion

      785,216                785,216  
                        

Other

      

Deferred income taxes

      24,283    280            24,563  

Compensation and benefits

      123,889                123,889  

Other long-term liabilities

      21,381    9,455            30,836  
                        
      169,553    9,735            179,288  
                        

Commitments and contingent liabilities

  

    

Capital

      

Business unit equity

  628,590    628,590    1,522,807        (2,151,397  628,590  
                        

Total liabilities and capital

 $628,590   $  1,666,305   $  1,751,549   $1,997   $  (2,152,651 $  1,895,790  
                        

122


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

For the interest rate risk to be significant.

Year Ended December 31, 2010

(dollars in thousands)

  BZ
Intermediate
Holdings LLC
(Parent)
  Co-issuers  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Nonguarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Cash provided by (used for) operations

      

Net income (loss)

 $63,577   $63,577   $218,131   $18   $(281,726 $63,577  

Items in net income (loss) not using (providing) cash

      

Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates

  (63,577  (218,149          281,726      

Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of deferred financing costs and other

      11,023    126,472            137,495  

Share-based compensation expense

      3,733                3,733  

Pension and other postretirement benefit expense

      9,537                9,537  

Deferred income taxes

      37,677    213    (8      37,882  

Change in fair value of energy derivatives

          609            609  

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

      43                43  

(Gain) loss on sales of assets, net

      2    310            312  

Other

      (850  (19          (869

Loss on extinguishment of debt

      22,225                22,225  

Decrease (increase) in working capital

      

Receivables

      1,225    55,662    (12  380    57,255  

Inventories

      3    (17,123          (17,120

Prepaid expenses

      4,437    253            4,690  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

      6,760    (13,208  138    (380  (6,690

Current and deferred income taxes

      7,142    (1,398          5,744  

Pension and other postretirement benefit payments

      (25,637              (25,637

Other

      (606  (2,399          (3,005
                        

Cash provided by (used for) operations

      (77,858  367,503    136        289,781  
                        

Cash provided by (used for) investment

      

Expenditures for property and equipment

      (3,711  (107,908          (111,619

Purchases of short-term investments

      (25,336              (25,336

Maturities of short-term investments

      24,744                24,744  

Sales of assets

          717            717  

Other

      868    1,356            2,224  
                        

Cash provided by (used for) investment

      (3,435  (105,835          (109,270
                        

Cash provided by (used for) financing

      

Issuances of long-term debt

      300,000                300,000  

Payments of long-term debt

      (334,096              (334,096

Payments of deferred financing costs

      (12,003              (12,003

Payments (to) from Boise Inc., net

  (31,639                  (31,639

Due to (from) affiliates

  31,639    230,064    (261,695  (8        

Other

      (5,333              (5,333
                        

Cash provided by (used for) financing

      178,632    (261,695  (8      (83,071
                        

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

      97,339    (27  128        97,440  

Balance at beginning of the period

      69,071    33    289        69,393  
                        

Balance at end of the period

 $   $166,410   $6   $417   $   $166,833  
                        

123


ITEM 8.BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended December 31, 2009

(dollars in thousands)

  BZ
Intermediate
Holdings LLC
(Parent)
  Co-issuers  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Cash provided by (used for) operations

      

Net income (loss)

 $147,814   $147,814   $331,704   $9   $(479,527 $147,814  

Items in net income (loss) not using (providing) cash

      

Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates

  (147,814  (331,713          479,527      

Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of deferred financing costs and other

      16,162    127,917            144,079  

Share-based compensation expense

      3,518                3,518  

Pension and other postretirement benefit expense

      7,376                7,376  

Deferred income taxes

      19,863    157            20,020  

Change in fair value of energy derivatives

          (5,877          (5,877

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

      (568              (568

(Gain) loss on sales of assets, net

      19    495            514  

Other

      (1,529  (1,110          (2,639

Loss on extinguishment of debt

      66,784                66,784  

Decrease (increase) in working capital, net of aquisitions

      

Receivables

      1,800    (24,744  978    463    (21,503

Inventories

      4    83,033            83,037  

Prepaid expenses

      (1,340  2,040    770        1,470  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

      13,723    13,435    (985  (463  25,710  

Current and deferred income taxes

      (395  (27          (422

Pension and other postretirement benefit payments

      (13,001              (13,001

Other

      754    (1,363          (609
                        

Cash provided by (used for) operations

      (70,729  525,660    772        455,703  
                        

Cash provided by (used for) investment

      

Acquisition of businesses and facilities

          (543          (543

Expenditures for property and equipment

      (2,789  (74,356          (77,145

Purchases of short-term investments

      (21,643              (21,643

Maturities of short-term investments

      11,615                11,615  

Sales of assets

      1    1,030            1,031  

Other

      1,357    811            2,168  
                        

Cash provided by (used for) investment

      (11,459  (73,058          (84,517
                        

Cash provided by (used for) financing

      

Issuances of long-term debt

      310,000                310,000  

Payments of long-term debt

      (531,523              (531,523

Extinguishment of debt

      (39,717              (39,717

Payments (to) from Boise Inc., net

  (49,915                  (49,915

Payments of deferred financing costs

      (13,156              (13,156

Due to (from) affiliates

  49,915    405,789    (452,576  (3,128        
                        

Cash provided by (used for) financing

      131,393    (452,576  (3,128      (324,311
                        

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

      49,205    26    (2,356      46,875  

Balance at beginning of the period

      19,866    7    2,645        22,518  
                        

Balance at end of the period

 $   $69,071   $33   $289   $   $69,393  
                        

124


BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and Subsidiaries

Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended December 31, 2008

(dollars in thousands)

  BZ
Intermediate
Holdings LLC
(Parent)
  Co-issuers  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Cash provided by (used for) operations

      

Net income (loss)

 $(41,860 $(41,860 $54,418   $9   $(12,567 $(41,860

Items in net income (loss) not using (providing) cash

      

Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates

  41,860    (54,427          12,567      

Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of deferred financing costs and other

      12,652    107,281            119,933  

Share-based compensation expense

      3,096                3,096  

Pension and other postretirement benefit expense

      8,388                8,388  

Deferred income taxes

      (6,289  (150          (6,439

Change in fair value of energy derivatives

          7,445            7,445  

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives

      479                479  

St. Helens mill restructuring

          35,998            35,998  

Other

      3,187    1,509            4,696  

Decrease (increase) in working capital, net of aquisitions

      

Receivables

      6,201    20,991    (2,686  790    25,296  

Inventories

      (2  (28,948          (28,950

Prepaid expenses

      8    (346  (765      (1,103

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

      8,958    (27,933  2,980    (790  (16,785

Current and deferred income taxes

      (1,409  1,629    2        222  

Pension and other postretirement benefit payments

      (636              (636

Other

      (426  (1,422          (1,848
                        

Cash provided by (used for) operations

      (62,080  170,472    (460      107,932  
                        

Cash provided by (used for) investment

      

Acquisition of businesses and facilities

      100,152    (1,316,606  (5      (1,216,459

Expenditures for property and equipment

      (4,200  (86,397          (90,597

Sales of assets

          394            394  

Other

      (3,099  (2,604          (5,703
                        

Cash provided by (used for) investment

      92,853    (1,405,213  (5      (1,312,365
                        

Cash provided by (used for) financing

      

Issuances of long-term debt

      1,125,700                1,125,700  

Payments of long-term debt

      (88,250              (88,250

Payments (to) from Boise Inc., net

  271,399                    271,399  

Payments of deferred financing costs

      (81,898              (81,898

Due to (from) affiliates

  (271,399  (966,459  1,234,748    3,110          
                        

Cash provided by (used for) financing

      (10,907  1,234,748    3,110        1,226,951  
                        

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

      19,866    7    2,645        22,518  

Balance at beginning of the period

                        
                        

Balance at end of the period

 $   $19,866   $7   $2,645   $   $22,518  
                        

125


INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT
PAGE
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM34
 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET35
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 200736
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 200737
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 200738
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS39

 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.

Boise Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. (a corporation in the development stage)Boise Inc. and subsidiary (the “Company”)subsidiaries as of December 31, 20072010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. We also have audited Boise Inc.’s. internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Boise Inc.’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanyingManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

126


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Boise Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, Boise Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Boise, Idaho

March 2, 2011

127


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

of Boise Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and subsidiaries (formerly known as Aldabra Holding Sub LLC) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), capital, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and for the period from February 1, 2007January 18, 2008 (inception) tothrough December 31, 2007.2008. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.


audits.

We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC and subsidiarysubsidiaries as of December 31, 2007,2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and for the period from February 1, 2007 (date of inception) toJanuary 18, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2007,2008, in conformity with United StatesU.S. generally accepted accounting principles.



McGladrey & Pullen,

/s/ KPMG LLP

Boise, Idaho

March 2, 2011

128


New York, New YorkIndependent Auditors’ Report


The Board of Directors

of Boise Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the period from January 1, 2008 through February 21, 2008,


34


Part I: Financial Information
Item 1 - Financial Statements
Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in of Boise Paper Products and subsidiaries. These consolidated financial statements are the development stage)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
 December 31, 2007 
ASSETS
   
Current assets:   
Cash
 $185,691 
Cash held in trust
  403,989,389 
Prepaid expenses
  58,872 
Total current assets  404,233,952 
Capitalized acquisition costs  3,293,350 
Deferred tax asset  85,031 
     
Total assets
 $407,612,333 
     
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    
Current liabilities:    
Accrued expenses
 $926,623 
Franchise tax payable
  88,665 
Income and capital taxes payable
  1,280,198 
Deferred underwriting fee
  12,420,000 
Total current liabilities
  14,715,486 
     
COMMON STOCK SUBJECT TO POSSIBLE CONVERSION
    
(16,555,860 - shares at conversion value)  159,760,000 
     
Commitments    
     
Stockholders’ equity    
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value, authorized
    
1,000,000 shares; none issued
  - 
Common stock, $.0001 par value,
    
authorized 100,000,000 shares,
    
issued and outstanding 51,750,000 shares
(which includes 16,555,860 shares subject to possible conversion)
  5,175 
Additional paid-in capital
  227,639,650 
Income accumulated during development stage
  5,492,022 
Total stockholders’ equity
  233,136,847 
     
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 $407,612,333 
See notes to Financial Statements.
35


Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Consolidated Statement of Income
  
For the period
February 1, 2007
(inception) to December 31, 2007
 
    
Interest income $10,421,536 
     
EXPENSES
    
Formation costs  1,000 
Professional fees  138,912 
Insurance expense  42,763 
Administrative fees  48,000 
Travel and entertainment  9,423 
Franchise tax expense  88,665 
Interest expense  5,790 
Miscellaneous expenses  4,794 
     
Total expenses  339,347 
     
Net income before income taxes  10,082,189 
     
Provision for income taxes  (4,590,167)
     
Net income $5,492,022 
     
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted  34,272,754 
     
Basic and diluted net income per share $0.16 

See notes to Financial Statements.

36


Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

  Common Stock 
Additional
paid-in
 Income accumulated during development Total stockholders’ 
  Shares Amount
 
capital stage equity 
Issuance of common stock to initial stockholders on February 1,2007 at $.002 per share  10,350,000 $1,035 $23,965 $- $25,000 
Proceeds from issuance of warrants  -  -  3,000,000  -  3,000,000 
Sale of 41,400,000 Units through public offering net of underwriter’s discount and offering expenses (which includes 16,555,860 shares subject to conversion)  41,400,000  4,140  384,375,685  -  384,379,825 
Less 16,555,860 shares of common stock subject to possible conversion  -  -  (159,760,000) -  (159,760,000)
Net Income  -  -     5,492,022  5,492,022 
 
Balance, December 31, 2007
  51,750,000 $5,175 $227,639,650 $5,492,022 $233,136,847 
37


Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

  For the period
 
 
 
February 1, 2007
 
 
 
(inception) to
 
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2007 
    
    
Cash Flows from Operating Activities   
Net income $5,492,022 
Adjustments to reconcile net income with net cash used in operating activities:    
Interest income on investments held in trust  (10,414,388)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:    
Increase in prepaid expenses  (58,872)
Increase in accrued expenses  257,689 
Increase in deferred tax asset  (85,031)
Increase in franchise tax payable  88,665 
Increase in income and capital taxes payable  1,280,198 
Net cash used in operating activities  (3,439,717)
Cash used in investing activities
    
Cash deposited in trust  (399,500,000)
Proceeds from trust  5,925,000 
Payment of acquisition costs  (2,624,416)
Net cash used in investing activities  (396,199,416)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
    
Proceeds from sale of shares of common stock to    
Initial Stockholders  25,000 
Proceeds from notes payable to Initial Stockholders  137,000 
Payment of notes payable to Initial Stockholders  (137,000)
Proceeds from public offering  414,000,000 
Proceeds from issuance of insider warrants  3,000,000 
Payment of costs associated with Offering  (17,200,176)
     
Net cash provided by financing activities  399,824,824 
     
Net increase in cash  185,691 
Cash at beginning of the period  - 
Cash at end of the period $185,691 
     
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities    
Accrual of deferred underwriting fee $12,420,000 
Accrual of acquisition costs $668,934 
See notes to Financial Statements.
38


Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
Organization and Business Operations
Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp., a corporation in the development stage, was incorporated in Delaware on February 1, 2007 for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business combination with an operating business. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Aldabra Sub LLC (together, the “Company”). All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The Company is considered to be in the development stage, as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 7, “Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises,” and is subject to the risks associated with activities of development stage companies.
The registration statement for the Company’s initial public offering (the “Offering”) was declared effective June 19, 2007. The Company consummated the Offering on June 22, 2007 and received net proceeds of approximately $384,380,000. The Company’s management had broad discretion with respect to the specific application of the net proceeds of this Offering, although substantially all of the net proceeds of this Offering were intended to be generally applied toward consummating a business combination with an operating business (the “Business Combination”). As described in Note 3, the Company has entered into a Purchase Agreement with Boise White Paper, L.L.C., Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C., Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings Corp. (collectively, the “Paper Group”) Boise Cascade, L.L.C. (the “Seller”) and Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C. (the “Target”). The Company’s stockholders approved the transaction February 5, 2008, and the closing is expected to take place on February 22, 2008.
39


Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Upon the closing of the Offering, an aggregate of $399,500,000, including the $3,000,000 proceeds of the private placement (the “Private Placement”) described in Note 2 and the $12,420,000 of deferred underwriters discounts described in Note 2, was placed in a trust account (the “Trust Account”), which was required to be invested in United States “government securities” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, having a maturity of 180 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940 until the earlier of (i) the consummation of the Company’s first Business Combination and (ii) liquidation of the Company. The placing of funds in the Trust Account may not protect those funds from third-party claims against the Company. Although the Company sought to have all vendors and service providers (which included any third parties we engaged to assist us in any way in connection with our search for a target business) and prospective target businesses execute agreements with the Company waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the Trust Account, there is no guarantee that, even though such entities executed such agreements with us, they will not seek recourse or that a court would not conclude that such agreements are not legally enforceable. The Company’s Chairman of the Board and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer have agreed that they will be liable under certain circumstances for ensuring that the proceeds in the Trust Account are not reduced by the claims of target businesses or claims of vendors or other entities that are owed money by the Company for services rendered or contracted for, or products sold to, the Company. However, there can be no assurance that these entities will be able to satisfy those obligations. Furthermore, they will not have any personal liability as to any claimed amounts owed to a third party who executed a waiver (including a prospective target business). Additionally, in the case of a prospective target business that did not execute a waiver, such liability would only have been in an amount necessary to ensure that public stockholders receive no less than $10.00 per share upon liquidation. The remaining net proceeds (not held in the Trust Account) were permitted to be used to pay for business, legal and accounting due diligence on prospective acquisitions and continuing general and administrative expenses. Additionally, up to an aggregate of $3,100,000 of interest earned on the Trust Account balance was permitted to be released to the Company to fund working capital requirements and additional amounts were permitted to be released to the Company as necessary to satisfy tax obligations. 
40

Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company, after signing a definitive agreement for the acquisition of a target business, was required to submit such transaction for stockholder approval. In the event that stockholders owning 40% or more of the shares sold in the Offering vote against the Business Combination and exercise their conversion rights described below, the Business Combination would not be consummated. All of the Company’s stockholders prior to the Offering, including all of the officers and directors of the Company (the “Initial Stockholders”), agreed to vote their founding shares of common stock in accordance with the vote of the majority in interest of all other stockholders of the Company (the “Public Stockholders”) with respect to any Business Combination. After consummation of a Business Combination, these voting safeguards will no longer be applicable.
With respect to a Business Combination that is approved and consummated, any Public Stockholder who voted against the Business Combination had the ability to demand that the Company convert such Public Stockholder’s shares. The per share conversion price is equal to the amount in the Trust Account, net of accrued taxes and expenses, calculated as of two business days prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, divided by the number of shares of common stock held by Public Stockholders at the consummation of the Offering. Accordingly, Public Stockholders holding up to 39.99% of the aggregate number of shares owned by all Public Stockholders (approximately 16,555,860 shares) could seek conversion of their shares in the event of a Business Combination. Accordingly, a portion of the net proceeds from the Offering (39.99% of the amounts originally placed in the Trust Account) has been classified as common stock subject to possible conversion in the accompanying balance sheet. On February 5, 2008, shareholders owning 12,543,778 shares voted against the Business Combination of which 12,347,427 shares have been presented for conversion. Such Public Stockholders are entitled to receive their per share interest in the Trust Account computed without regard to the shares held by Initial Stockholders. 
41

Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Company will continue in existence only until 24 months from June 19, 2007, the effective date of the Offering. If the Company had not completed a Business Combination by such date, its corporate existence would cease, and the Company would dissolve and liquidate for the purposes of winding up its affairs. In the event of liquidation, it is possible that the per share value of the residual assets remaining available for distribution (including Trust Fund assets) would be less than the Offering price per share in the Offering (assuming no value is attributed to the Warrants contained in the Units sold in the Offering).
Concentration of Credit Risk - The Company maintains cash in a bank deposit account that exceeds federally insured (FDIC) limits. The Company has not experienced any losses on this account.
Capitalized Acquisition Costs - Capitalized Acquisition costs includes direct costs related to the Business Combination described in Note 3. Indirect and general expenses are expensed as incurred.
Deferred Income Taxes - Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in future taxable or deductible amounts and are based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to effect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
42

Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Net Income Per Share - Net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The effect of the 41,400,000 outstanding Warrants issued in connection with the Offering and the 3,000,000 outstanding Warrants issued in connection with the Private Placement has not been considered in diluted income per share calculations, since such Warrants are contingently exercisable.
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncements - Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.
2.
Public Offering and Private Placement
In June 2007, the Company completed its Offering in which it sold to the public 41,400,000 units (the “Units”), including 5,400,000 Units subject to the underwriters’ over-allotment option at an Offering price of $10.00 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one share of the Company’s common stock and one Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the “Warrants”). Each Warrant will entitle the holder to purchase from the Company one share of common stock at an exercise price of $7.50, commencing on the later of the completion of a Business Combination and one year from the effective date of the Offering and expiring four years from the effective date of the Offering. The Company may redeem the Warrants, at a price of $.01 per Warrant, upon 30 days’ notice while the Warrants are exercisable, only in the event that the last sale price of the common stock is at least $14.25 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending on the third day prior to the date on which notice of redemption is given. In accordance with the warrant agreement relating to the Warrants to be sold and issued in the Offering, the Company is only required to use its best efforts to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement covering the Warrants. If a registration statement is not effective at the time of exercise, the Company will not be obligated to deliver securities, and there are no contractual penalties for failure to deliver securities. Additionally, in the event that a registration is not effective at the time of exercise, the holder of such Warrant shall not be entitled to exercise such Warrant and in no event (whether in the case of a registration statement not being effective or otherwise) will the Company be required to net cash settle the Warrant exercise. Consequently, the Warrants may expire unexercised and unredeemed.
43

Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company agreed to pay the underwriters in the Offering an underwriting discount of 7% of the gross proceeds of the Offering. However, the underwriters agreed that 3% of the gross proceeds of the Offering ($12,420,000) will not be payable unless and until the Company completes a Business Combination. This amount has been recorded as a deferred underwriting fee in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Furthermore, the underwriters have waived their right to receive such payment upon the Company’s liquidation if the Company is unable to complete a Business Combination.
Simultaneously with the consummation of the Offering, the Company’s Chairman and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer purchased a total of 3,000,000 Warrants (the “Insider Warrants”) at $1.00 per Warrant (for an aggregate purchase price of $3,000,000) privately from the Company. The amount paid for the Warrants approximated fair value on the date of issuance. All of the proceeds received from these purchases have been placed in the Trust Account. The Insider Warrants purchased were identical to the Warrants underlying the Units issued in the Offering except that the Warrants may not be called for redemption and the Insider Warrants may be exercisable on a “cashless basis,” at the holder’s option, so long as such securities are held by such purchaser or his affiliates. Furthermore, the purchaser has agreed that the Insider Warrants will not be sold or transferred by them, except for estate planning purposes, until after the Company has completed a Business Combination. 
44

Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3.
Purchase Agreement for Proposed Business Combination
On September 7, 2007, the Paper Group, the Seller, the Target, Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. and Aldabra Sub LLC (the Company’s direct, wholly-owned subsidiary) entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated October 18, 2007, by and among such persons (the “Purchase Agreement” and the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, the “Acquisition”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company will acquire the Paper Group and other assets and liabilities related to the operation of the paper, packaging and newsprint, and transportation businesses of the Paper Group and most of the headquarters operations of the Seller (collectively, the business to be acquired from the Seller, “Boise Paper Products” or “BPP”) through the acquisition of the Target. The Acquisition is structured such that, upon closing, Aldabra will indirectly own - through Aldabra Sub LLC - 100% of the outstanding common units of the Target, which will in turn own 100% of BPP, including 100% of the outstanding equity interests of the Paper Group. The Company will account for the Acquisition using the purchase method of accounting and will also allocate fair market value to these assets at the time of the Acquisition from a tax perspective.
Use of Offering Proceeds
The Company intends to use the proceeds currently in the Trust Account, net of accrued expenses and taxes to acquire BPP’s assets, to pay transactions expenses (including initial business, legal and accounting due diligence expenses on prospective business combinations, general and administrative expenses and corporate income and franchise taxes) and to pay holders of Offering shares who exercise their redemption rights. The net proceeds deposited into the Trust Account remain on deposit in the Trust Account earning interest and will not be released until the earlier of the consummation of a Business Combination or the Company’s liquidation.
45

Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Purchase Price
At the closing of the Acquisition, the Company will deliver cash and stock (and under certain conditions detailed below, a subordinated promissory note) equal to $1,625,000,000 plus or minus an incremental amount equal to the sum of (i) the Paper Group’s cash and cash equivalents (expected to be $38,000,000), (ii) plus or minus the amount by which the estimated net working capital of the paper and packaging and newsprint businesses of the Seller is greater or less than $329,000,000 (as applicable), and (iii) plus the amount (if any) by which the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ estimated net working capital is less than $404,350,800, in each case calculated as of 11:59 p.m. (Boise, Idaho time) on the day before closing (the “Adjustment Calculation Time”) (the net amount derived from the foregoing, the “total purchase price”). Following the closing, these estimated amounts will be compared against the actual amounts, with any subsequent adjustments payable through the issuance to the Seller of additional shares of the Company’s common stock or the return by the Seller and cancellation of shares of the Company’s common stock -in each case, valued based upon an average per share closing price of the Company’s common stock for the 20 trading day period ending three trading days prior to closing, disregarding for this purpose in such period any day in which trading of the Company’s common stock was conducted by, or on behalf of, an officer or director of the Company or a family member or affiliate thereof (the “Average Trading Price”) - held by the Seller.
At least $1,210,000,000 of the total purchase price must be paid in cash, plus the amount of fees and expenses paid directly by the Seller to lenders and/or agents providing the debt financing and minus other expenses specified in the Purchase Agreement (the “Minimum Cash Amount”). The actual cash portion of the total purchase price will equal the amount of the Company’s cash at closing (including the cash held in the Trust Fund, but excluding any amounts paid upon exercise by the Company’s stockholders of conversion rights), less transaction expenses plus the amount of the net proceeds from the debt financing, but will not in any event be less than the Minimum Cash Amount (the “Cash Portion”).
46

Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The balance of the total purchase price will be paid in the Company’s common stock. For purposes of calculating the number of shares that will be issued to the Seller, the Average Trading Price will not be higher than $10.00 per share or lower than $9.54 per share.
Seller’s Share Ownership Limitation
The Purchase Agreement provides that the Seller will not receive shares that would cause it to hold in excess of 49% of the Company’s common stock immediately following the closing of the Acquisition (excluding, for purposes of this calculation, the Company’s outstanding Warrants) and that, in lieu of receiving shares in excess of 49%, the Company will instead pay the Seller an amount equal to the value of such excess shares (valued at the Average Trading Price) in cash or through the issuance of a subordinated promissory note.
Purchase Price Adjustment
No later than one business day prior to the closing, (i) the Seller will deliver to the Company the Seller’s calculation of the estimated net working capital of the paper and packaging and newsprint businesses of the Seller as of the Adjustment Calculation Time and the estimated aggregate cash and cash equivalents of the Paper Group and its subsidiaries as of the Adjustment Calculation Time and (ii) the Company will deliver to the Seller the Company’s calculation of its estimated net working capital and its subsidiaries as of the Adjustment Calculation Time.
47

Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
At the closing of the Acquisition, the estimated total purchase price of $1,625,000,000 will be adjusted by (i) either adding the amount, if any, by which the estimated net working capital of the paper and packaging and newsprint businesses of the Seller is greater than $329,000,000 or subtracting the amount, if any, by which the estimated net working capital of the paper and packaging and newsprint businesses of the Seller is less than $329,000,000, (ii) adding the estimated aggregate cash and cash equivalents of the Paper Group and its subsidiaries as of the Adjustment Calculation Time and (ii) adding the amount, if any, by which the estimated net working capital of Aldabra and its subsidiaries is less than $404,350,800.
Following the closing, the estimated total purchase price will be subject to reconciliation based upon the actual net working capital of the paper and packaging and newsprint businesses of the Seller, the actual aggregate cash and cash equivalents of the Paper Group and its subsidiaries and the actual net working capital of Aldabra and its subsidiaries (in each case as of the Adjustment Calculation Time) relative to the estimates therefore utilized in the calculation of the estimated total purchase price. If the estimated purchase price is greater than the total purchase price, the Seller is required, within five business days after the total purchase price is finally determined, to pay Aldabra an amount equal to such excess, which excess amount is payable by the Seller’s delivery to Aldabra for cancellation of shares of Aldabra common stock which, when multiplied by the Average Trading Price, equals such excess amount.
Consummation of Acquisition
On February 5, 2008, shareholders approved the Acquisition and related resolutions necessary for the consummation of the Acquisition. At the time the Acquisition was approved, holders of 12,247,427 shares elected to convert their shares into cash. This will result in payment to those converting shareholders of approximately $119,893,516 from the Trust Account at the consummation of the Acquisition. As a result of this conversion, upon closing of the Acquisition, Seller will receive as part of the Minimum Cash Portion a subordinated note of approximately $36,202,888 million and the Company will incur additional indebtedness of approximately $60,700,000 million relative to a scenario in which no shareholders elected to convert.
48

Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4.
Cash held in trust
Reconciliation of cash held in trust as of December 31, 2007, is as follows:

Contribution to trust $399,500,000 
Interest income received  10,414,388 
Withdrawals to fund operations  (2,530,000)
Withdrawals to fund estimated taxes  (3,395,000)
Total cash held in trust $403,989,388 
5.
Notes Payable, Stockholders
The Company issued unsecured promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of $100,000 to two of the Initial Stockholders on February 27, 2007. Additional unsecured promissory notes in aggregate amounts of $25,000 and $12,000 were issued to the Initial Stockholders on June 12, 2007 and June 21, 2007, respectively. The notes were non-interest bearing and were payable on the earlier of February 27, 2008 and the consummation of the Offering. The notes payable to Initial Stockholders were paid in full on June 22, 2007. At December 31, 2007, $23,267 was payable to an Initial Stockholder, Nathan Leight, and was included in Accrued Expenses for additional expenses incurred on behalf of the Company.
6.
Income Taxes
For the period from February 1, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2007, the provision for income taxes consists of the following:

Current:
   
Federal $2,913,096 
State and Local  1,762,102 
Deferred  (85,031)
Total $4,590,167 
49

Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax asset are as follows:

Expenses deferred for income tax purposes $119,669 
Less: valuation allowance  (34,638)
Total $85,031 
Management has recorded a valuation allowance against its state and local deferred tax asset because, based on its current operations at December 31, 2007, it believes it is more likely than not that sufficient taxable income will not be generated to fully utilize this asset.
The Company’s effective tax rate of approximately 45.5% (which takes into account the valuation allowance) differs from the federal statutory rate of 34% due to the effect of state and local income taxes.

U.S. statutory income tax rate34.0%
State and local income taxes11.5
Effective tax rate45.5%
7.
Commitments
The Company presently occupies office space provided by an affiliate of two of the Initial Stockholders. Such affiliate has agreed that, until the Company consummates a Business Combination, it will make such office space, as well as certain office and secretarial services, available to the Company, as may be required by the Company from time to time. The Company agreed to pay such affiliate $7,500 per month for such services commencing on the effective date of the Offering. The accompanying consolidated statement of income includes $48,000 of administration fees relating to this agreement.
50

Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Pursuant to letter agreements that the Initial Stockholders entered into with the Company and the underwriters, the Initial Stockholders waived their right to receive distributions with respect to their founding shares upon the Company’s liquidation.
The Initial Stockholders and the holders of the Insider Warrants (or underlying securities) will be entitled to registration rights with respect to their founding shares or Insider Warrants (or underlying securities) pursuant to an agreement that was signed prior to the effective date of the Offering. The holders of the majority of the founding shares are entitled to demand that the Company register these shares at any time commencing three months prior to the first anniversary of the consummation of a Business Combination. The holders of the Insider Warrants (or underlying securities) are entitled to demand that the Company register these securities at any time after the Company consummates a Business Combination. In addition, the Initial Stockholders and holders of the Insider Warrants (or underlying securities) have certain “piggy-back” registration rights on registration statements filed after the Company’s consummation of a Business Combination. 
As long as the holders of (i) the shares of common stock issued to the Seller pursuant to the Acquisition or (ii) any other shares of Aldabra common stock acquired by the Seller control 33% or more of the Aldabra common stock issued to the Seller at the closing, Aldabra will be subject to restrictions on its business activities pursuant to the terms of an investor rights agreement by and between Aldabra, the Seller and certain directors and officers of Aldabra.
The Company agreed to pay the fees to the underwriters in the Offering as described in Note 2 above. 
8.
Common Stock
Effective June 12, 2007 and June 19, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock dividend of 0.5 shares of common stock and 0.2 shares of common stock, respectively, for each outstanding share of common stock. On June 12, 2007, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation was amended to increase the authorized shares of common stock from 60,000,000 to 85,000,000 shares of common stock. On June 19, 2007, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation was further amended to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock to 100,000,000 shares of common stock. All references in the accompanying financial statements to the number of shares of common stock have been retroactively restated to reflect these transactions.
51

Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.
(a corporation in the development stage)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
9.
Preferred Stock
The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with such designations, voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors.
The agreement with the underwriters prohibits the Company, prior to a Business Combination, from issuing preferred stock that participates in the proceeds of the Trust Account or which votes as a class with the common stock on a Business Combination.
10.
Commitments and Contingencies
On October 18, 2007, Aldabra Sub LLC entered into a commitment letter with Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P. with respect to (i) a $250 million senior secured first lien Tranche A term loan facility, (ii) a $475 million senior secured first lien Tranche B term loan facility, (iii) a $250 million senior secured first lien revolving credit facility and (iv) a $200 million (which amount may be increased up to $260.7 million) senior secured second lien term loan facility, to provide financing for the Acquisition. With respect to these loan facilities, on November 2, 2007, Aldabra Sub LLC entered into an amended and restated commitment letter with Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P. and Lehman Brothers Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P. and Lehman Brothers Commercial Paper Inc. as the initial lenders. This commitment is subject to the lack of a material change in the Company’s financial condition and the financial condition of BPP, legal requirements (such as the granting of security interests for the benefit of the lenders) and other matters that are in addition to the conditions under the purchase agreement. The loan facilities are subject to the execution of definitive documentation.
On February 20, 2008, the Company announced that Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P. and Lehman Brothers Inc. had priced these loan facilities as follows:
·    a $250 million senior secured first lien revolving credit facility and a $250 million senior secured first lien Tranche A term loan facility priced at LIBOR plus 325 basis points, with a term of five years and a closing fee of approximately 2%;
·    a $475 million senior secured first lien Tranche B term loan facility priced at LIBOR (with a floor of 4.00%) plus 350 basis points, with a term of six years and a closing fee of 5%; and
·    a $260.7 million senior secured second lien term loan facility priced at LIBOR (with a floor of 5.5%) plus 700 basis points, with a term of seven years and a closing fee of 10%.
52


ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, with the participation of its principal executive officer / principal financial officer, evaluated the effectivenessresponsibility of the Company’s disclosure controlsmanagement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a−15(e) and 15d−15(e) underperform the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of December 31, 2007. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer / principal financial officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2007, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were (i) designedaudit to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to the Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer / principal financial officer, by others within those entities, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared and (ii) effective, in that they provideobtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that information required to be disclosed by the Companyare appropriate in the reports that it files or submits undercircumstances, but not for the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported withinpurpose of expressing an opinion on the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No changes ineffectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as definedreporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in Rules 13a-15(f)the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and 15d-15(f) undersignificant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the Exchange Act) occurred duringoverall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the quarter ended December 31, 2007, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyconsolidated financial statements referred to materially affect,above present fairly, in all material respects, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

53

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION.
Special Meeting of Stockholders
On February 5, 2008, we held a special meeting of our stockholders.  At the Special Meeting, our stockholders voted upon and approved the following proposals:
1.the adoption of the purchase agreement the approval of the Acquisition;
2.the adoption of a certificate of amendment to our existing amended and restated certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 100 million to 250 million;
3.the adoption of an amended and restated charter, immediately following the closing of the Acquisition, to, among other things, change our name to “Boise Inc.,” delete certain provisions that relate to us as a blank check company and create perpetual corporate existence;
4.the election of nine members of the board of directors to serve on the Boise Inc. board of directors from the completion of the Acquisition until their successors are duly elected and qualified; and
5.the adoption of the 2008 Boise Inc. Incentive and Performance Plan.
Exchange Listing
On February 8, 2008, Aldabra, pursuant to authorization received from its board of directors, informed the AMEX that the Company intends to transfer the listing of its common stock and its common stock purchase warrants to the NYSE.  Subject to the completion of the proper securities filings, the Company’s common stock and its common stock purchase warrants are expected to commence trading on the NYSE under the symbols “BZ” and “BZ.WS” following the Company’s acquisitionresults of Boise Cascade, L.L.C.’s packagingPaper Products and paper manufacturing business, which is anticipated to occur on February 22, 2008.  Untilsubsidiaries operations and their cash flows for the transfer, the Company’s common stock, common stock purchase warrants, and units will continue to trade on the AMEX under the symbols “AII,” “AII.WS” and “AII.U,” respectively.
PART III
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
Directors and Executive Officers
Our current directors and executive officers are as follows:
Name
Age
Position
Nathan D. Leight48Chairman of the Board
Jason G. Weiss38Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
Jonathan W. Berger48Director
Richard H. Rogel58Director
Carl A. Albert65Director
Nathan D. Leight, Director
Mr. Leight will serve as a director following the Acquisition. He has been Aldabra’s chairman of the board since its inception. Mr. Leight is the co-founder and a managing member of Terrapin Partners, LLC, a co-founder and a managing member and the chief investment officer of Terrapin Asset Management, LLC and TWF Management Company, L.L.C. Terrapin Partners, LLC, established in 1998, is a private investment management firm focusing on private equity investing. Terrapin Asset Management, LLC, established in March 2002, focuses primarily on the management of multi-manager hedge fund portfolios and as ofperiod from January 1, 2008 managed more than $500 millionthrough February 21, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Boise, Idaho

February 23, 2009

129


ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

We have had no disagreements with our independent accountants regarding accounting or financial disclosure matters.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We have attached the certifications of assets. TWF Management Company, established in December 2004, focuses on the management of a water industry focused hedge fund (The Water Fund, LP), and as of January 1, 2008, managed more than $60 million. From September 1998 to March 1999, Mr. Leight served as the interimour chief executive officer of e-STEEL L.L.C., an industry-specific business-to-business software enterprise, and from January 2000 to May 2002, he served as interim chief executive officer of VastVideo, Inc., a provider of special interest video content and related technology to web sites and interactive television operators. Both e-STEEL and VastVideo were Terrapin Partners, LLC portfolio companies. From February 1995 to August 1998, Mr. Leight was employed by Gabriel Capital LP, a hedge fund with assets exceeding $1 billion specializing in investing in bankruptcies, under-valued securities, emerging markets, and merger arbitrage, and from February 1995 to August 1997, he served as its chief investment officer. From December 1991 to February 1995, Mr. Leight served as a managing director of Dillon Read & Co., a private investment firm, where he oversaw the firm’s proprietary trading department. Mr. Leight received a B.A. from Harvard College (cum laude). Mr. Leight is also a member of the board of directors of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation. Mr. Leight is the cousin of Jonathan W. Berger.

Jason G. Weiss, Director
Mr. Weiss will serve as a director following the Acquisition. He has been Aldabra’s chief executive officer, secretary, and a member of Aldabra’s board of directors since Aldabra’s inception. Mr. Weiss is the co-founder and a managing member of Terrapin Partners, LLC, Terrapin Asset Management, LLC and TWF Management Company. From March 1999 to December 1999, he served as the chief executive officer of PaperExchange.com, Inc, a paper industry focused software enterprise and a Terrapin Partners, LLC portfolio company, and from December 1999 to March 2000, he served as executive vice president of strategy. Mr. Weiss also served as a managing member of e-STEEL L.L.C. from September 1998 to March 1999. Mr. Weiss also served as a managing member of Terrapin Partners, LLC, American Classic Sanitation, L.L.C., a construction site and special event services business specializing in portable toilets, temporary fencing, and sink rentals, from August 1998 to December 2000 and from January 2004 to March 2004. He also served as its chief executive officer from August 1998 to December 1999 and as a consultant from August 1998 to January 2004. Mr. Weiss received a B.A. from the University of Michigan (with Highest Distinction) and a J.D. (cum laude) from Harvard Law School. Mr. Weiss is also a member of the board of directors of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation.
Jonathan W. Berger, Director
Mr. Berger  will serve as a director following the Acquisition. He has been a member of Aldabra’s board of directors since its inception. Mr. Berger has been associated with Navigant Consulting, Inc., an NYSE-listed consulting firm, since December 2001, and is the managing director and co-practice area leader for that firm’s corporate finance practice. He has also been president of Navigant Capital Advisors, L.L.C., Navigant Consulting, Inc.’s registered broker-dealer, since October 2003. From January 2000 to March 2001, Mr. Berger was president of DotPlanet.com, an Internet services provider. From August 1983 to December 1999, Mr. Berger was employed by KPMG, LLP, an independent public accounting firm, and served as a partner from August 1991 to December 1999 where he was in charge of the corporate finance practice for three of those years. Mr. Berger received a B.S. from Cornell University and an M.B.A. from Emory University. Mr. Berger is a certified public accountant. Mr. Berger is also a member of the board of directors of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation and is chairman of its audit committee. Mr. Berger is the cousin of Nathan D. Leight.
Richard H. Rogel, Director
Mr. Rogel has been a member of our board of directors since our inception. Since 1997, Mr. Rogel has been a private investor. Mr. Rogel served as chairman of the board of CoolSavings, Inc., a provider of interactive marketing services to advertisers, their agencies, and publishers, from 1996 to December 2005, serving as its chairman of the board from July 2001 to December 2005 and as the chairman of its audit committee from 1998 to December 2005. In 1982, Mr. Rogel founded Preferred Provider Organization of Michigan, Inc., a preferred provider organization for health care delivery, and served as its Chairman from its inception until it was sold in 1997. Mr. Rogel has been a director of Origen Financial, Inc., a Nasdaq Global Market listed real estate investment trust, since August 2003. Mr. Rogel is the chairman of The Michigan Difference, a $2.5 billion endowment campaign for the University of Michigan. He is also on the University of Michigan President Advisory Board and is the past president of the University of Michigan Alumni Association. He has self-funded over 200 scholarships for the University of Michigan. He serves on the Board of Trustees of the Progressive Policy Institute and the Board of Directors of the Gore Range Natural Science School. Mr. Rogel received a B.B.A. from the University of Michigan.
Carl A. Albert, Director

        Mr. Albert will serve as chairman of the board following the Acquisition. He has been a member of Aldabra’s board of directors since its inception. Since April 2000, Mr. Albert has served as the chairman of the board and chief executivefinancial officer of Fairchild Venture Capital Corporation, a private investment firm. From September 1990 to April 2000, he was the majority owner, chairman of the boardwith this Form 10-K. Rules 13a-14(a) and chief executive officer of Fairchild Aerospace Corporation and Fairchild Dornier Corporation, and chairman of the supervisory board of Dornier Luftfahrt, GmbH, all aircraft manufacturing companies. From 1989 to 1990, Mr. Albert was a private investor. After providing start up venture capital, he served from 1981 to 1988 as chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Wings West Airlines, a California-based regional airline that completed an IPO in 1983 and was acquired by AMR Corporation, parent of American Airlines, in 1988. Following the acquisition, Mr. Albert served as president until 1989. Prior to this, he was an attorney specializing in business, real estate, and corporate law. Mr. Albert received a B.A. from the University of California at Los Angeles and an L.L.B. from the University of California at Los Angeles School of Law.
Audit Committee
Our Audit Committee consists of Jonathan W. Berger, as chairman, Richard H. Rogel and Carl A. Albert, each of whom is an independent director under the AMEX’s listing standards. The audit committee’s duties, which are specified in our Audit Committee Charter, include, but are not limited to:
·reviewing and discussing with management and the independent auditor the annual audited financial statements, and recommending to the board whether the audited financial statements should be included in our Form 10−K;
·discussing with management and the independent auditor significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of our audited financial statements;
·discussing with management major risk assessment and risk management policies;
·monitoring the independence of the independent auditor;
·verifying the rotation of the lead (or coordinating) audit partner having primary responsibility for the audit and the audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit as required by law;
·reviewing and approving all related-party transactions;
·inquiring and discussing with management our compliance with applicable laws and regulations;
·pre-approving all audit services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditor, including the fees and terms of the services to be performed;
·appointing or replacing the independent auditor;
·determining the compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor (including resolution of disagreements between management and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work; and
·establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or reports which raise material issues regarding our financial statements or accounting policies.
Financial Experts on Audit Committee
Our audit committee is composed exclusively of “independent directors” who are “financially literate” as defined under the AMEX listing standards. The AMEX listing standards define “financially literate” as being able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement.
In addition, we must certify to the AMEX that the committee has, and will continue to have, at least one member who has past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or other comparable experience or background that results in the individual’s financial sophistication. The board of directors has determined that Jonathan W. Berger satisfies the AMEX’s definition of financial sophistication and also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under rules and regulations of the SEC.
Nominating Committee
Our nominating committee of the board of directors consists of Jonathan W. Berger, as chairman, and Richard H. Rogel, each of whom is an independent director under the AMEX’s listing standards. The nominating committee is responsible for overseeing the selection of persons to be nominated to serve on our board of directors. The nominating committee considers persons identified by its members, management, shareholders, investment bankers and others.
Guidelines for Selecting Director Nominees
The guidelines for selecting nominees, which are specified in the Nominating Committee Charter, generally provide that persons to be nominated:
·should have demonstrated notable or significant achievements in business, education or public service;
·should possess the requisite intelligence, education and experience to make a significant contribution to the board of directors and bring a range of skills, diverse perspectives and backgrounds to its deliberations; and
·should have the highest ethical standards, a strong sense of professionalism and intense dedication to serving the interests of the stockholders.
The Nominating Committee will consider a number of qualifications relating to management and leadership experience, background and integrity and professionalism in evaluating a person’s candidacy for membership on the board of directors. The nominating committee may require certain skills or attributes, such as financial or accounting experience, to meet specific board needs that arise from time to time. The nominating committee does not distinguish among nominees recommended by shareholders and other persons.
Compensation Committee
Because neither Aldabra executive officers nor Aldabra board members receive cash compensation for services rendered to us, we do not have a need for a Compensation Committee.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a)15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requiresrequire that we include these certifications with this report. This section includes information concerning the disclosure controls and procedures referred to in the certifications and our internal control over financial reporting. You should read this section in conjunction with the certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

Introduction

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) defines such term. We have designed these controls and procedures to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. We have also designed our disclosure controls to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our senior management, including the chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO), as appropriate, to allow them to make timely decisions regarding our required disclosures.

We also maintain “internal control over financial reporting.” The SEC defines such internal control as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, a public company’s CEO and CFO, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP. This control includes policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transaction and disposition of our assets, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Limitation on the Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and/or internal controls will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that we have detected all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our Company. Further, the design of any control system is based in part upon assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of this inherent limitation in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected even when effective disclosure controls and internal controls are in place.

130


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in meeting the objectives for which they were designed and were operating at a reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We had no changes to our internal controls over financial reporting or other factors during the year and quarter ended December 31, 2010, that affected materially, or are reasonably likely to affect materially, our internal controls.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is located on the following page of this Form 10-K, and KPMG LLP’s Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on internal control over financial reporting is located in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K.

131


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of Boise Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Management assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. Management based its assessment on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Based upon this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report, which is included herein.

132


ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.

133


PART III

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information concerning our directors and officers, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percentis incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to the section of our common stock,definitive proxy statement entitled “Proposals to Be Voted on, Proposal No. 1 — Election of Directors.” We will file our definitive proxy statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) no later than 120 days after December 31, 2010.

Information concerning our executive officers is set forth in “Part I, Item 1. Business” of this Form 10-K under the caption “Executive Officers of Registrant.”

Information concerning family relationships between our directors or executive officers is incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to the section of our definitive proxy statement entitled “Transactions With Related Persons, Promoters, and Certain Control Persons.” We will file our definitive proxy statement with the SEC an initial reportno later than 120 days after December 31, 2010.

Information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of ownershipthe Securities and Exchange Act and our corporate governance is incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to the sections of our common stock on Form 3definitive proxy statement entitled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and reports of changes in ownership of“Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters.” We will file our common stock on Form 4 or Form 5, as applicable. We believe that during fiscal 2007, all of our executive officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners fileddefinitive proxy statement with the required reports on a timely basis under Section 16(a).

SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2010.

Code of Ethics

The AldabraOur board of directors has adopted a codeCode of ethicsEthics that applies not only to our directors but also to all of our employees, including our chief executive officers, directorsofficer, chief financial officer, and employees. We have filed copiesprincipal accounting officer. A copy of our codeCode of ethics as exhibitsEthics is available, free of charge, by visiting our website at www.boiseinc.com and selectingInvestors,Corporate Governance, and thenCode of Ethics.

If we amend or grant a waiver of one or more of the provisions of our Code of Ethics, we intend to disclose the amendment or waiver by posting the required information on our website within four business days following such amendment or waiver. No waivers of our Code of Ethics have been granted to date.

Information concerning material changes to the registrationprocedures by which our securityholders may recommend nominees to our board of directors is incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to the section of our definitive proxy statement entitled “Solicitation of Proxies and Voting.” We will file our definitive proxy statement with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2010.

Mr. Berger, our Audit Committee chair, is a financial expert as that term is defined in connectionRegulation S-K, Item 407(d)(5). Further information concerning our Audit Committee is incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to the sections of our definitive proxy statement entitled “Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters” and “Audit Committee Matters.” We will file our definitive proxy statement with our IPO. These documents may be reviewed by accessing Aldabra’s public filings at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

59

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Aldabra will paySEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2010.

134


ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information concerning compensation fees or other payments toof our executive officers and directors prioris incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to the sections of our initial business combination, or for anydefinitive proxy statement entitled “Executive Compensation” and “Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters.” We will file our definitive proxy statement with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2010.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

A description of the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and equity compensation plan information are incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to the sections of our definitive proxy statement entitled “Security Ownership” and “Executive Compensation.” We will file our definitive proxy statement with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2010.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

A description of certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to the section of our definitive proxy statement entitled “Transactions With Related Persons, Promoters, and Certain Control Persons.” We will file our definitive proxy statement with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2010.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Information with respect to fees paid to, and services rendered in orderby, our principal accountant and our policies and procedures for preapproving those services is incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to effectuate the consummationsection of our initial business combination. Our compensation philosophydefinitive proxy statement entitled “Audit Committee Matters.” We will file our definitive proxy statement with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2010.

135


PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)The following documents are filed as a part of this Form 10-K:

(1)Consolidated Financial Statements

The Consolidated Financial Statements, the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and objectives will be developed to match our business after completionthe Reports of our initial business combination. Since no compensation has been paid, the compensation tables required pursuant toIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firms are presented in “Part II, Item 4028. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of Regulation S-K are omitted from this filing.

Form 10-K.

Compensation Committee Report
Aldabra does not maintain a standing Compensation Committee since it does not compensate its officers or directors.
Based on its review

Boise Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the Compensation DiscussionDecember 31, 2010 and Analysis required by Item 402(b), the Aldabra board2009.

Boise Inc. Consolidated Statements of directors has recommended that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KIncome (Loss) for the fiscal yearyears ended December 31, 2007. Since Aldabra does not compensate its officers2010, 2009, and directors,2008, and the Company has nothingPredecessor Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss) for the period of January 1 through February 21, 2008.

Boise Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, and the Predecessor Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the period of January 1 through February 21, 2008.

Boise Inc. Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008.

BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.

BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, and the Predecessor Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss) for the period of January 1 through February 21, 2008.

BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, and the Predecessor Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the period of January 1 through February 21, 2008.

BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC Consolidated Statements of Capital for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008.

Notes to disclose in this section.Consolidated Financial Statements.

Nathan D. Leight
Jason G. Weiss
Jonathan W. Berger
Richard H. Rogel
Carl A. Albert
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions
Not applicable.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change

Reports of ControlIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm—KPMG LLP.

Independent Auditors’ Report—KPMG LLP.

None.
Executive Officer and Director Compensation
No Aldabra executive officer or director has received any cash compensation, fees or other payments for services rendered to us. However, we pay and, until the consummation of the Acquisition will continue to pay, Terrapin Partners, LLC, an affiliate of Messrs. Leight and Weiss, a fee of $7,500 per month for providing us with administrative, technology and secretarial services, as well as the use of limited office space, including a conference room, in New York City. This arrangement is solely for our benefit and is not intended to provide Messrs. Leight and Weiss compensation in lieu of a salary. Other than the $7,500 per month administrative fee, no compensation of any kind, including finders, consulting or other similar fees, is or will be paid to any of our executive officers or directors or any of their respective affiliates, prior to, or for any services they render in order to effectuate, the consummation of a business combination. However, such individuals will be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with activities on our behalf such as identifying potential target businesses and performing due diligence on suitable business combinations. There is no limit on the amount of these out-of-pocket expenses and there is no review of the reasonableness of the expenses by anyone other than our board of directors, which includes persons who may seek reimbursement, or a court of competent jurisdiction if such reimbursement is challenged.
60

Other than the securities described in the sections appearing elsewhere in this Annual

Management’s Report on Form 10-K entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters,” none of our directors have received any of our equity securities. Furthermore, none of our directors have received compensation for serving on the board.Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The following table sets forth, as of February 8, 2008, the actual beneficial ownership of Aldabra’s common stock by (i) each person owning greater than 5% of Aldabra’s outstanding common stock; (ii) each current director and named executive officers of Aldabra:
Name of Beneficial Owner and Management(1)
 
# of
shares(2)
 
%
 
Amber Master Fund (Cayman) SPC(3)(4) 
  3,090,000  5.97%
Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership and Terrapin Partners Employee Partnership(5) 
  10,215,000  19.74%
Nathan D. Leight(5)(6)(7) 
  10,763,300  20.80%
Jason G. Weiss(5)(7) 
  10,765,000  20.80%
Jonathan W. Berger(8)(9) 
  45,500  * 
Richard H. Rogel(10) 
  158,000  * 
Carl A. Albert(11) 
  90,000  * 
Sanjay Arora(12) 
  621,000  1.20%
All directors and executive officers as a group (5 persons)  11,606,800  22.43%

*Less than 1%.
(1)Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each of the individuals is c/o Terrapin Partners, LLC, 540 Madison Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10022.
(2)On February 8, 2008, 51,750,000 shares of Aldabra common stock were outstanding.Financial Statement Schedules
(3)The address of Amber Master Fund (Cayman) SPC is P.O. Box 309 GT, Ugland House, South Church Street, George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands.
61

(4)Derived from Schedule 13G, filed with the SEC on December 17, 2007. As reported in the Schedule 13G, each of Amber Master Fund (Cayman) SPC, Amber Capital LP, Amber Capital GP LLC, Michael Brogard and Joseph Oughourlian is the beneficial owner of 3,090,000 shares of Aldabra common stock and shares the power to direct the vote and disposition of the Aldabra common stock.
(5)Includes (a) 9,913,500 shares of common stock held by the Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership and (b) 301,500 shares of common stock held by the Terrapin Partners Employee Partnership. Messrs. Leight and Weiss are the general partners of the Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership and they and/or their family trusts are the owners of the Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership. Terrapin Partners, LLC is the general partner of the Terrapin Partners Employee Partnership and Messrs. Leight and Weiss are the co-managers of Terrapin Partners, LLC. Accordingly, all shares held by the Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership and the Terrapin Partners Employee Partnership are deemed to be beneficially owned by them. Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership has allocated 621,000 shares to Sanjay Arora and 165,000 shares to Guy Barudin, both of whom are employees of Terrapin Partners, LLC, and 10,000 shares to each of Sheli Rosenberg and Peter R. Deutsch, both special advisors to Aldabra. The remaining shares held by Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership have been allocated to Messrs. Leight and Weiss (or their affiliates). Messrs. Arora’s and Barudin’s shares vest over time commencing from the consummation of Aldabra’s IPO for as long as Mr. Arora and Mr. Barudin remain employed by Terrapin Partners, LLC. The shares allocated to Messrs. Leight and Weiss (or their affiliates) and Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Deutsch have no vesting requirements and have already vested in full in the individuals or entities. Terrapin Partners Employee Partnership has allocated certain of its shares to employees and affiliates of Terrapin Partners, LLC. These shares vest in full in the employees and affiliates when the shares are released from escrow, provided such individuals are still employed by or affiliated with Terrapin Partners, LLC at such time.
(6)Does not include 2,900 warrants underlying the 2,900 units purchased by Mr. Leight post-IPO, which warrants are not currently exercisable but which warrants are expected to be exercisable within 60 days after the consummation of Aldabra’s business combination.
(7)Excludes 1,500,000 warrants which are not currently exercisable but which warrants are expected to be exercisable within 60 days after the consummation of Aldabra’s business combination.
(8)The business address of Mr. Berger is 1180 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 1900, Atlanta, Georgia 30309.
(9)Does not include 10,000 warrants purchased by Mr. Berger post-IPO, which warrants are not currently exercisable but which warrants are expected to be exercisable within 60 days after the consummation of Aldabra’s business combination.
(10)Does not include 40,000 warrants purchased by Mr. Rogel post-IPO, which warrants are not currently exercisable but which warrants are expected to be exercisable within 60 days after the consummation of Aldabra’s business combination.
(11)The business address of Mr. Albert is 10940 Bellagio Road, Suite A, Los Angeles, California 90077.
(12)Represents shares allocated by Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership to Mr. Arora and does not include 2,000 shares of common stock purchased by Mr. Arora in the open market. The shares vest over time commencing from the consummation of Aldabra’s IPO, for so long as Mr. Arora remains employed by Terrapin Partners, LLC. To the extent such shares do not vest, they will revert back to Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership.
On February 1, 2008, Aldabra announced that certain institutional shareholders had entered into contingent value rights agreements with Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership, Boise Cascade, L.L.C. and Aldabra.  Under the contingent value rights agreements, the institutional shareholders will receive from Terrapin Partners Venture Partnership and Boise Cascade, L.L.C. certain contingent value rights to receive payments in cash and/or shares of Aldabra’s common stock; such shareholders agreed to vote in favor of certain proposals at Aldabra’s special meeting of stockholders, which took place on February 5, 2008. For additional information regarding the contingent value rights agreements, see Aldabra’s DEFA14As filed with the SEC on February 1, 2008 and February 4, 2008.
62

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Agreements with Stockholders
Subscription Agreements. Pursuant to written subscription agreements with the Company and Lazard Capital Markets, LLC, Messrs. Leight and Weiss agreed to purchase the 3,000,000 Aldabra Insider Warrants (for a total purchase price of $3,000,000) from Aldabra. These purchases took place on a private placement basis simultaneously with the consummation of the Offering. The purchase price for the Aldabra Insider Warrants was delivered to Graubard Miller, Aldabra’s counsel in connection with the Offering, who also acted solely as escrow agent in connection with the private sale of the Aldabra Insider Warrants, to hold in an account until Aldabra consummated the Offering. The purchase price of the warrants was deposited into the trust account simultaneously with the consummation of the IPO. The Aldabra Insider Warrants are identical to warrants underlying the units being offered in the IPO except that the Aldabra Insider Warrants (i) are exercisable on a cashless basis, (ii) may be exercised whether or not a registration

All financial statement relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is effective and current and (iii) are not redeemable by Aldabra so long asschedules have been omitted because they are still held by the purchasersinapplicable, not required, or their affiliates. Messrs. Leight and Weiss have agreed that the Aldabra Insider Warrants will not be sold or transferred by them (except to employees of Terrapin Partners, LLC or to Aldabra’s directors at the same cost per warrant originally paid by them) until the later of June 19, 2008 and 60 days after the consummation of Aldabra’s business combination. Pursuant to the agreement signed on June 22, 2007, the holders of the majority of these Aldabra Insider Warrants (or underlying shares) will be entitled to demand that Aldabra register these securities pursuant to an agreement. The holders of the majority of these securities may elect to exercise these registration rights with respect to such securities at any time after Aldabra consummates a business combination. In addition, these holders have certain “piggy-back” registration rights with respect to registration statements filed subsequent to such date. Aldabra will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements. If the Acquisition is consummated, these registration rights will be replaced by registration rights pursuant to an investor rights agreement to be entered into in connection with the consummation of the Acquisition by Aldabra, the Seller and Aldabra Insider Stockholders.


Investor Rights Agreement. In connection with the Acquisition and as a condition for its completion, Aldabra, the Aldabra IRA stockholders and the Seller will enter into an investor rights agreement. From and after the closing date of the Acquisition, holders of at least a majority of the Seller Registrable Securities, or Aldabra Registrable Securities, as the case may be, will have the right to demand registration under the Securities Act of all or any portion of their registrable securities, subject to amount and time limitations. Holders of a majority of the Seller Registrable Securities may demand five long-form registrations and an unlimited number of short-form registrations, while holders of Aldabra Registrable Securities may demand two long-form registrations and an unlimited number of short-form registrations; provided that,shown in the case of any long-form registration, the aggregate offering value of the registrable securities requested to be registered in such long-form registration must equal at least $25,000,000, and, in the case of any short-form registration, the aggregate offering value of the registrable securities requested to be registered in such short-form registration must equal at least $5,000,000. Additionally, whenever Aldabra proposes to register any of its securities under the Securities Act and the registration form to be used may be used for the registration of registrable securities, holders of Aldabra Registrable Securities, Seller Registrable Securities or Other Registrable Securities will have the right to request the inclusion of their registrable securities in such registration pursuant to piggyback registration rights granted under the investor rights agreement.
Pursuant to the investor rights agreement, the holders of a majority of the Seller Registrable Securities will have the right to nominate to be elected to Aldabra’s board a number of directors proportional to the voting power represented by the shares of Aldabra common stock that the holders of Seller Registrable Securities own until such time as the holders of Seller Registrable Securities own less than 5% of the voting power of all of the outstanding common stock of Aldabra. Similarly, pursuant to the investor rights agreement, the holders of a majority of the Aldabra Registrable Securities will have the right to nominate to be elected to Aldabra’s board a number of directors proportional to the voting power represented by the shares of Aldabra capital stock that the holders of Aldabra Registrable Securities own until such time as the holders of Aldabra Registrable Securities own less than 5% of the voting power of all of the outstanding capital stock of Aldabra.
Holders of registrable securities representing at least 5% of Aldabra’s common stock will have information and inspection rights with respect to Aldabra and its subsidiaries (including the right to receive copies of quarterly and annual consolidated financial statements and notes in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of Aldabra and copies of annual budgets and the right to visit and inspect anythis Form 10-K.

(3)Exhibits

A list of the properties and to examine the corporate and financial records of Aldabra and its subsidiaries). Additionally, the investor rights agreement sets forth affirmative and negative covenants to which Aldabra will be subject to as long as the holders of Seller Registrable Securities own at least 33% of the shares of Aldabra common stock issued to the holders of Seller Registrable Securities as of the closing date of the Acquisition. In addition, the investor rights agreement sets forth additional affirmative covenants to which Aldabra and its subsidiaries will be subject during any period(s) in which the Seller and/or any person or entity affiliated with the Seller isexhibits required to consolidate the resultsbe filed as part of operations and financial position of Aldabra and/or any of its subsidiaries or to account for its investment in Aldabra under the equity method of accounting (determined in accordance with GAAP and consistent with the SEC reporting requirements).


Agreements with Officers and Directors
The Company issued unsecured promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of $100,000 to two of the directors and officers of the Company (the “Initial Stockholders”) on February 27, 2007. Additional unsecured promissory notes in aggregate amounts of $25,000 and $12,000 were issued to the Initial Stockholders on June 12, 2007 and June 21, 2007, respectively. The notes were non-interest bearing and were payable on the earlier of February 27, 2008 or the consummation of the Offering. The notes payable to Initial Stockholders were paid in full on June 22, 2007.
Aldabra will reimburse its officers and directors for any reasonable out-of-pocket business expenses incurred by them in connection with certain activities on Aldabra’s behalf, such as identifying and investigating possible target businesses and business combinations. Therethis report is no limit on the amount of out-of-pocket expenses reimbursable by Aldabra, which will be reviewed only by Aldabra’s board or a court of competent jurisdiction if such reimbursement is challenged.
From the closing of Aldabra’s IPO through December 31, 2007, an aggregate of $50,092, $16,046, $330 and $287 was paid to Messrs. Leight, Weiss, Albert and Berger, respectively, for a total of $66,755, to reimburse them for expenses incurred by them on behalf of Aldabra. As of December 31, 2007, an additional $23,267 was owed to Mr. Leight for further expenses incurred by him on behalf of Aldabra.
Agreements with the Seller
Contribution Agreement. In connection with the Acquisition and as a condition for its completion, prior to the closing of the Acquisition, the Seller and the Target will enter into a contribution agreement pursuant to which the Seller will contribute, and cause certain of its subsidiaries to contribute, to the Target certain assets of the Seller and its subsidiaries to the extent predominantly usedset forth in the operation of BPP,Index to Exhibits and the Seller shall assign, and cause certain of its subsidiaries to assign, to the Target, and the Target shall assume from the Seller and certain of its subsidiaries, certain liabilities related to the operation of BPP, the contributed assets and/or the Paper Group.
Timber Procurement and Management Agreement. In connection with the Acquisition and as a condition for its completion, prior to the closing of the Acquisition, Louisiana Timber Procurement Company, L.L.C. (“LTPC”) shall be formed as a limited liability company in the State of Delaware. LTPC will be managed as a joint venture between Aldabra and the Seller. In connection with the Acquisition and as a condition for its completion, each of Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C. and Boise Building Solutions Manufacturing, L.L.C., a post-closing subsidiary of the Seller, will (i) become members of the LTPC, with each owning 50% of the outstanding units, and (ii) enter into a timber procurement and management agreement with LTPC pursuant to which LTPC will manage the procurement for each of Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C. and Boise Building Solutions Manufacturing, L.L.C. of their respective requirements for saw logs and pulpwood for Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C.’s pulp and paper mill in DeRidder, Louisiana, and for Boise Building Solutions Manufacturing, L.L.C.’s plywood mills in Oakdale, Louisiana and Florien, Louisiana.

Intellectual Property License Agreement. In connection with the Acquisition and as a condition for its completion, Aldabra (on behalf of itself and its affiliates) and the Seller (on behalf of itself and its affiliates) will enter into an intellectual property license agreement pursuant to which the Seller will provide Aldabra a royalty-free, fully-paid, worldwide, non-transferable (except under certain circumstances (e.g., to any affiliate or a successor-in-interest to BPP)) and exclusive right and license (subject to specified retained rights of the Seller) to use specified trademarks of the Seller in connection with the operation of BPP (on the terms and conditions set forth therein).
Outsourcing Agreement. In connection with the Acquisition and as a condition for its completion, Aldabra and the Seller will enter into an outsourcing services agreement. Pursuant to this agreement, the parties will provide administrative services, such as information technology, accounting, financial management, and human resources services, to each other for a price equal to the provider’s fully allocable cost. The initial term of the agreement is for three years. It will automatically renew for one-year terms unless either party provides notice of termination to the other party at least 12 months in advance of the applicable term.
Director Independence
The AMEX requires that a majority of our board must be composed of “independent directors,” which is defined generally as a person other than an officer or employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship, which, in the opinion of the company’s board of directors would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
The Company has determined that Jonathan W. Berger, Richard H. Rogel and Carl A. Albert are independent directors as defined under the AMEX’s listing standards and Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), constituting a majority of our board. Our independent directors will have regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present.
Any affiliated transactions will be on terms no less favorable to us than could be obtained from independent parties. Any affiliated transactions must be approvedincorporated by a majority of our independent and disinterested directors.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
As previously disclosed in our January 25, 2008 8-K filing, a majority of the partners of Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP (“GGK”) became partners of McGladrey &Pullen (“M&P”). As a result, GGK resigned as auditors of the Company effective January 25, 2008, and M&P was appointed as our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with the Company’s annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The following table represents the aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed for services rendered by M&P and GGK for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007:
Audit Fees - M&P
 $25,000 
Audit Fees - GGK $82,072 
Audit-Related Fees $- 
Tax Fees $- 
All Other Fees $- 
Total Fees $82,072 
Audit Fees
M&P audit fees consist of fees for the audit of our year end financial statements. GGK audit fees consist of the review of the interim financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and services rendered in connection with our registration statements, including related audits and proxy filings.
Audit-Related Fees
We did not incur audit-related fees with M&P for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
Tax Fees
We did not incur tax-related fees with M&P for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
All Other Fees
We did not incur any fees with M&P during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 other than those described above.
Audit Committee’s Pre-approval Policy and Procedures
Our audit committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the approval of all audit and non-audit services that are to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. This policy generally provides that we will not engage our independent registered public accounting firm to render audit or non-audit services unless the service is specifically approved in advance by the audit committee or the engagement is entered into pursuant to one of the pre-approval procedures described below.
67


PART IV
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
reference.

Exhibit No.
(b)
Description
1.1Form of Underwriting Agreement (1)
1.2Form of Selected Dealers Agreement (2)
2.1Purchase and Sale Agreement, by and among Boise Cascade, L.L.C., Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise White Paper, L.L.C., Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C., Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings Corp., Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. and Aldabra Sub LLC (3)
2.2Amendment No. 1See Index to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated October 18, 2007, by and among Boise Cascade, L.L.C., Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise White Paper, L.L.C., Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C., Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings Corp., Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. and Aldabra Sub LLC (4)
3.1Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (5)
3.2By-laws (2)
4.1Specimen Unit Certificate (2)
4.2Specimen Common Stock Certificate (2)
4.3Specimen Warrant Certificate (2)
4.4Form of Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Registrant (1)
10.1Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Nathan D. Leight (2)
10.2Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Jason G. Weiss (2)Exhibits.
68

136


10.3Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Jonathan W. Berger (2)
10.4Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Richard H. Rogel (2)
10.5Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Carl A. Albert (2)
10.6Form of Investment Management Trust Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Registrant (1)
10.7Form of Stock Escrow Agreement between the Registrant, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Initial Stockholders (1)
10.8Form of Letter Agreement between Terrapin Partners LLC and Registrant regarding administrative support (2)
10.9Form of Promissory Note issued to each of Nathan D. Leight and Jason G. Weiss (2)
10.10Form of Registration Rights Agreement among the Registrant and the Initial Stockholders (6)
10.11Form of Subscription Agreements among the Registrant, Graubard Miller and each of Nathan D. Leight and Jason G. Weiss (2)
14.1Form of Code of Ethics (6)
21.1List of Subsidiaries (*)
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (*)
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (*)
99.1Form of Audit Committee Charter (6)
69

99.2Form of Nominating Committee Charter (6)
99.3Audited Financial Statements (7)

*SIGNATURESFiled herewith.

(1)Previously filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, filed with the SEC on June 13, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(2)Previously filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on March 19, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(3)Previously filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Form 8-K/A, filed with the SEC on September 12, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(4)Previously filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 24, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(5)
Previously filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1MEF, filed with the SEC on June 19, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(6)Previously filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, filed with the SEC on April 26, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(7)Previously filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 27, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
70


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant hasregistrants have duly caused this report to be signed on itstheir behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

BOISE INC.  
Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.



BZ INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS LLC
By:  /s/ Jason G. Weiss
Dated: February 21, 2008

/s/ Samuel K. Cotterell


Jason G. Weiss

/s/ Samuel K. Cotterell

Samuel K. Cotterell

Senior Vice President and
Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer

(As Duly Authorized Officer and Chief
Accounting Officer)

Samuel K. Cotterell

Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

(As Duly Authorized Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)

Dated: March 2, 2011

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on March 2, 2011, by the following persons on behalf of the registrantregistrants and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature
 

TitleSignature

Date

    

Capacity

(i)

Principal Executive Officer:
/s/ Alexander ToeldteChief Executive Officer
Alexander Toeldte

(ii)

Principal Financial Officer:
/s/ Samuel K. CotterellSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Samuel K. Cotterell

(iii)

Principal Accounting Officer:
/s/ Samuel K. CotterellSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Samuel K. Cotterell

(iv)

Directors:
/s/ Carl A. Albert/s/ Heinrich R. Lenz
Carl A. AlbertHeinrich R. Lenz
/s/ Jonathan W. Berger/s/ Alexander Toeldte
Jonathan W. BergerAlexander Toeldte
/s/ Jack Goldman/s/ Jason G. Weiss
Jack GoldmanJason G. Weiss
/s/ Nathan D. Leight  
Chairman of the Board of Directors
 February 21, 2008
Nathan D. Leight   

137


BOISE INC.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Filed or Furnished With the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2010.

Exhibit
Number

  

Exhibit Description

 Incorporated by Reference Filed
Herewith
 
               Form              Exhibit
Number
 Filing
    Date    
 
2.1  Purchase and Sale Agreement dated September 7, 2007, between Boise Cascade, L.L.C., Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise White Paper, L.L.C., Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C., Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings Corp., Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp., and Aldabra Sub LLC DEFM14A  1/23/08 
2.2  Amendment No. 1 to Purchase and Sale Agreement dated October 18, 2007, between Boise Cascade, L.L.C., Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise White Paper, L.L.C., Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C., Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings Corp., Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp., and Aldabra Sub LLC DEFM14A  1/23/08 
2.3  Amendment No. 2 to Purchase and Sale Agreement dated February 22, 2008, between Boise Cascade, L.L.C., Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise White Paper, L.L.C., Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C., Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings Corp., Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp., and Aldabra Sub LLC 8-K 10.2 2/28/08 
3.1  Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Boise Inc. 8-K 3.1 2/28/08 
3.2  Bylaws of Boise Inc., amended and restated effective as of July 11, 2008 8-K 3.1 7/14/08 
3.3  Certificate of Formation of Aldabra Holding Sub LLC (now BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC) and amendment S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.3 5/18/10 
3.4  Limited Liability Company Agreement of Aldabra Holding Sub LLC (now BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC) effective as of February 12, 2008, and amendment S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.4 5/18/10 
3.5  Certificate of Formation of Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., and amendment S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.5 5/18/10 
3.6  Limited Liability Company Agreement of Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., effective February 22, 2008, and amendment S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.6 5/18/10 
3.7  Certificate of Incorporation of Boise Finance Company S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.7 5/18/10 
3.8  Bylaws of Boise Finance Company S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.8 5/18/10 

138


Exhibit
Number

  

Exhibit Description

 Incorporated by Reference Filed
Herewith
 
               Form              Exhibit
Number
 Filing
    Date    
 
3.9  Certificate of Incorporation of Boise Co-Issuer Company S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.9 5/18/10 
3.10  Bylaws of Boise Co-Issuer Company S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.10 5/18/10 
3.11  Certificate of Formation of Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C., and amendment S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.11 5/18/10 
3.12  Operating Agreement of Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C., effective as of September 20, 2004, and amendment S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.12 5/18/10 
3.13  Certificate of Formation of Boise White Paper, L.L.C., and amendment S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.13 5/18/10 
3.14  Operating Agreement of Boise White Paper, L.L.C., effective as of September 20, 2004, and amendment S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.14 5/18/10 
3.15  Certificate of Incorporation of Birch Creek Funding Corporation (now Boise White Paper Sales Corp.) and amendment S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.15 5/18/10 
3.16  Bylaws of Boise White Paper Sales Corp. S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.16 5/18/10 
3.17  Certificate of Incorporation of Boise Cascade Transportation, Inc. (now Boise White Paper Holdings Corp.) and amendments S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.17 5/18/10 
3.18  Bylaws of Boise White Paper Holdings Corp. S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.18 5/18/10 
3.19  Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of International Falls Power Company and amendment S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.19 5/18/10 
3.20  Amended and Restated Bylaws of International Falls Power Company S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.20 5/18/10 
3.21  Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railway Company S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.21 5/18/10 
3.22  Amended and Restated Bylaws of Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railway Company S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.22 5/18/10 
3.23  Certificate of Incorporation of Bemis Corporation S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

 3.23 5/18/10 

139


Exhibit
Number

  

Exhibit Description

 Incorporated by Reference  Filed
Herewith
 
               Form              Exhibit
Number
  Filing
    Date    
  
3.24  Bylaws of Bemis Corporation S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

  3.24    5/18/10   
3.25  Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of B C T, Inc., and amendment S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

  3.25    5/18/10   
3.26  Amended and Restated Bylaws of B C T, Inc. S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

  3.26    5/18/10   
3.27  Certificate of Incorporation of Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings Corp. S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

  3.27    5/18/10   
3.28  Bylaws of Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings Corp. S-4

(Reg. No.

333-166926)

  3.28    5/18/10   
4.1  Specimen Unit Certificate S-1  4.1    3/19/07   
4.2  Specimen Common Stock Certificate S-1

POS AM

No. 1

  4.2    6/13/08   
4.3  Specimen Warrant Certificate S-1

POS AM

No. 1

  4.3    6/13/08   
4.4  Warrant Agreement dated June 19, 2007, between Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. (now Boise Inc.) and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company 10-Q  4.1    5/4/10   
4.5  Investor Rights Agreement dated February 22, 2008, between Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. (now Boise Inc.), Boise Cascade, L.L.C., Boise Cascade Holdings, L.L.C., certain directors and officers of Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp., the Aldabra Shareholders, and each other Person who becomes a party to this Agreement after February 22, 2008 8-K  4.1    2/28/08   
4.6  Indenture dated October 26, 2009, between Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise Finance Company, the Guarantors set forth therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee 8-K  4.1    10/28/09   
4.7  Form of 9% Senior Note due 2017 8-K  4.1    10/28/09   
4.8  Indenture dated March 19, 2010, between Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise Co-Issuer Company, the Guarantors set forth therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee 8-K  4.1    3/22/10   
4.9  Form of 8% Senior Note due 2020 8-K  4.1    3/22/10   
9  None    

140


Exhibit
Number

  

Exhibit Description

 Incorporated by Reference Filed
Herewith
               Form              Exhibit
Number
 Filing
    Date    
 
10.1  Form of Promissory (PIK) Note dated February 22, 2008, issued in connection with the Acquisition 8-K 10.3 2/28/08 
10.2  Letter Agreement dated May 22, 2008, adjusting amount of Promissory (PIK) Note dated February 22, 2008 8-K 99.1 5/29/08 
10.3  Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 4, 2009, between certain Affiliated Funds and Boise Inc.    X
10.4  Form of Subscription Agreements between Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp., Graubard Miller, and each of Nathan D. Leight and Jason G. Weiss S-1 10.11 3/19/07 
10.5 (a)  Amended and Restated Paper Purchase Agreement dated April 28, 2004, between Boise White Paper, L.L.C., and Boise Cascade Corporation (now OfficeMax Incorporated), together with the Assignment Assumption and Consent Agreement dated October 29, 2004, between Boise Cascade Corporation (now OfficeMax Incorporated), Boise White Paper, L.L.C., OfficeMax Contract, Inc., and OfficeMax North America, Inc. 8-K 10.1 2/28/08 
10.6  Registration Rights Agreement dated October 26, 2009, between Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise Finance Company, the Guarantors set forth therein, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.    X
10.7  

Registration Rights Agreement dated March 19, 2010, between Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise

Co-Issuer Company, the Guarantors set forth therein, and Banc of America Securities LLC

 8-K 99.1 3/22/10 
10.8  Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated February 22, 2008, between Aldabra Sub LLC (subsequently merged with and into Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C.), Aldabra Holding Sub LLC, certain subsidiaries of Aldabra Sub LLC (as Guarantors), Various Lenders, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. (as Joint Lead Arranger, Joint Bookrunner, Administrative Agent, and Collateral Agent), Toronto Dominion (Texas) LLC (as Syndication Agent), Bank of America, N.A. and Cobank, ACB (as Co-Documentation Agents), and Lehman Brothers Inc. (as Joint Lead Arranger and Joint Bookrunner) — $975,000,000 Senior Secured First Priority Credit Facilities    X
10.9  First Amendment to Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated October 13, 2009, between the Company, the Guarantors set forth therein, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as Administrative and Collateral Agent, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.    X

141


Exhibit
Number

  

Exhibit Description

 Incorporated by Reference  Filed
Herewith
 
               Form              Exhibit
Number
  Filing
    Date    
  
10.10  Second Amendment to Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated October 20, 2010, between Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as Administrative Agent, and the Guarantors listed on the signature pages thereto 8-K  99.1    10/25/10   
10.11  Second Lien Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated February 22, 2008, between Aldabra Sub LLC (subsequently merged with and into Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C.), Aldabra Holding Sub LLC, certain subsidiaries of Aldabra Sub LLC (as Guarantors), Various Lenders, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. (as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent), Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. (as Joint Lead Arranger, Joint Bookrunner, and Syndication Agent), and Lehman Brothers Inc. (as Joint Lead Arranger, Joint Bookrunner, and Documentation Agent) — $260,700,000 Senior Secured Second Priority Credit Facility     X  
10.12  First Amendment to Second Lien Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated October 13, 2009, between the Company, the Guarantors set forth therein, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as Administrative and Collateral Agent, Barclays Bank PLC, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.     X  
10.13  Pledge and Security Agreement (First Lien) dated February 22, 2008, between each of the Grantors party thereto and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. (as Collateral Agent) 8-K  10.7    2/28/08   
10.14  Trademark Security Agreement (First Lien) dated February 22, 2008, between Aldabra Sub LLC (subsequently merged with and into Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C.), Aldabra Holding Sub LLC, certain subsidiaries of Aldabra Sub LLC (as Guarantors), and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. (as Collateral Agent) 8-K  10.9    2/28/08   
10.15  

Patent Security Agreement (First Lien) dated

February 22, 2008, between Aldabra Sub LLC (subsequently merged with and into Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C.), Aldabra Holding Sub LLC, certain subsidiaries of Aldabra Sub LLC (as Guarantors), and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. (as Collateral Agent)

 8-K  10.11    2/28/08   
10.16  Tranche A Term Loan Note dated February 22, 2008, issued to The Bank of Nova Scotia in the amount of $12,500,000 8-K  10.13    2/28/08   
10.17  Tranche A Term Loan Note dated February 22, 2008, issued to RZB Finance LLC in the amount of $2,500,000 8-K  10.14    2/28/08   

142


Exhibit
Number

  

Exhibit Description

 Incorporated by Reference  Filed
Herewith
 
               Form              Exhibit
Number
  Filing
    Date    
  
10.18    Revolving Loan Note dated February 22, 2008, issued to The Bank of Nova Scotia in the amount of $12,500,000 8-K  10.15    2/28/08   
10.19    Revolving Loan Note dated February 22, 2008, issued to RZB Finance LLC in the amount of $2,500,000 8-K  10.16    2/28/08   
10.20    Outsourcing Services Agreement dated February 22, 2008, between Boise Cascade, L.L.C., and Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C.     X  
10.21    Intellectual Property License Agreement dated February 22, 2008, between Boise Cascade, L.L.C., and Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C. 8-K  10.18    2/28/08   
10.22    Form of Indemnification Agreement between Boise Inc. and its Directors and Elected Officers 8-K  99.1    11/2/10   
10.23 *  Severance Agreement dated December 9, 2010, between Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., and Alexander Toeldte 8-K  99.1    12/14/10   
10.24 *  

Form of 2010 Officer Severance Agreement

     X  
10.25 *  Boise Inc. Directors Deferred Compensation Plan effective April 4, 2008 10-Q  10    5/5/08   
10.26 *  Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Deferred Compensation Plan effective February 22, 2008, amended as of October 27, 2009 10-K  10.26    2/25/10   
10.27 *  Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Supplemental Life Plan effective February 22, 2008 10-K  10.35    2/24/09   
10.28 *  Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Financial Counseling Program effective February 22, 2008 10-K  10.36    2/24/09   
10.29 *  Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Supplemental Pension Plan (SUPP) effective February 22, 2008 10-K  10.37    2/24/09   
10.30 *  Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Supplemental Early Retirement Plan (SERP) for Certain Elected Officers effective February 22, 2008 10-K  10.38    2/24/09   
10.31 *  Boise Inc. Incentive and Performance Plan effective February 22, 2008, amended as of April 29, 2010 8-K  99.1    5/3/10   
10.32 *  Form of 2008 Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Officers) 8-K  99.1    5/6/08   
10.33 *  Form of 2008 Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Officers) 8-K  99.2    5/6/08   
10.34 *  Form of 2009 Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Officers) 8-K  99.2    4/24/09   
10.35 *  Form of 2009 Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Officers) 8-K  99.3    4/24/09   
10.36 *  Form of 2009 Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Nonemployee Directors) 10-Q  10.4    5/5/09   

143


Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

Incorporated by Reference  
/s/ Jason G. WeissChief Executive Officer,February 21, 2008
Jason G. WeissSecretary and DirectorFiled
Herewith
 
               Form             Exhibit
Number
Filing
    Date    
  
/s/ Jonathan W. Berger
10.37 *  DirectorForm of 2009 Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Nonemployee Directors) February 21, 2008
Jonathan W. Berger10-Q    
10.5    
/s/ Richard H. Rogel5/5/09  Director
10.38 *  February 21, 2008Form of 2010 Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Nonemployee Directors)
Richard H. Rogel10-Q    
10.3    
/s/ Carl A. Albert5/4/10  Director
10.39 *  February 21, 2008
CarlRestricted Stock Unit Award Agreement dated November 1, 2010, with Robert A. AlbertWarren (Special award upon Mr. Warren’s election as executive vice president and chief operating officer)8-K    99.2

71

EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
Description
    11/2/10
1.1
10.40 *

Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement dated January 1, 2011, with Samuel K. Cotterell

(Special award upon Mr. Cotterell’s election as senior vice president and chief financial officer)

X
10.41 *  Form of UnderwritingRestricted Stock Award Agreement (1)dated March 15, 2011 (Officers)
8-K    99.13/1/11
1.2
10.42 *  Form of Selected DealersRestricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (2)dated March 15, 2011 (Officers)
8-K    
2.199.2Purchase and Sale Agreement, by and among Boise Cascade, L.L.C., Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise White Paper, L.L.C., Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C., Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings Corp., Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. and Aldabra Sub LLC (3)
    
2.23/1/11Amendment No. 1 to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated October 18, 2007, by and among Boise Cascade, L.L.C., Boise Paper Holdings, L.L.C., Boise White Paper, L.L.C., Boise Packaging & Newsprint, L.L.C., Boise Cascade Transportation Holdings Corp., Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp. and Aldabra Sub LLC (4)
   
3.1
11  Amended and Restated CertificatePresented in Footnote 3, Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share, to Consolidated Financial Statements
12

BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC Ratio of Incorporation (5)Earnings to Fixed Charges

  
3.2By-laws (2)
X  
4.1
13  Specimen Unit Certificate (2)
None 
4.2 Specimen Common Stock Certificate (2)
 
4.3 Specimen Warrant Certificate (2)
14 (b)  
4.4Boise Inc. Code of Ethics Form of Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Registrant (1)
 
10.1 Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Nathan D. Leight (2)
 
10.2
18  Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Jason G. Weiss (2)
72

10.3None Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Jonathan W. Berger (2)
 
10.4 Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Richard H. Rogel (2)
 
10.5Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Lazard Capital Markets LLC and Carl A. Albert (2)
10.6Form of Investment Management Trust Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Registrant (1)
10.7Form of Stock Escrow Agreement between the Registrant, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Initial Stockholders (1)
10.8Form of Letter Agreement between Terrapin Partners LLC and Registrant regarding administrative support (2)
10.9Form of Promissory Note issued to each of Nathan D. Leight and Jason G. Weiss (2)
10.10Form of Registration Rights Agreement among the Registrant and the Initial Stockholders (6)
10.11Form of Subscription Agreements among the Registrant, Graubard Miller and each of Nathan D. Leight and Jason G. Weiss (2)
14.1Form of Code of Ethics (6)
21.121  List of Subsidiaries (*)
  X
22None
23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — KPMG LLPX
23.2Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — KPMG LLPX
23.3Consent of Independent Auditor — KPMG LLPX
24Inapplicable
31.1  CEO Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuantPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (*)
  X  
32.1
31.2  CFO Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuantPursuant to Section 906302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (*)X
32Section 906 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate Holdings LLCX

144


Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

Incorporated by ReferenceFiled
Herewith
   
99.1            Form              Form of Audit Committee Charter (6)
73

99.2Exhibit
Number
 Form of Nominating Committee Charter (6)
Filing
    Date    
  
99.3
33  Audited Financial Statements (7)Inapplicable
34Inapplicable
35Inapplicable
100None

*Filed herewith.

(1)*PreviouslyIndicates exhibits that constitute management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.

(a)Confidential information in this exhibit has been omitted and filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, filedseparately with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a confidential treatment request under Rule 406 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

(b)Our Code of Ethics can be found on June 13, 2007our website at www.boiseinc.com by selectingInvestors,Corporate Governance, and incorporated herein by reference.thenCode of Ethics.
(2)Previously filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on March 19, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(3)Previously filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Form 8-K/A, filed with the SEC on September 12, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(4)Previously filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 24, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(5)
Previously filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1MEF, filed with the SEC on June 19, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(6)Previously filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, filed with the SEC on April 26, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(7)Previously filed as an exhibit to Aldabra 2 Acquisition Corp.’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 27, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
74

145