UNITED STATES
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
 
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(D) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20092010
 
Transition Report Under Section 13 or 15(D) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
for the transition period from _______________ to _______________
 
Commission File Number: 333-133327
 
INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
(Exact name of small Business Issuer as specified in its charter)
 
California20-0956471
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or(IRS Employer Identification No.)
organization) 
  
260 Santa Ana Court450 National Ave 
Sunnyvale,Mountain View, CA9408594043
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
 
Issuer's telephone number, including area code: (408) 505-2394(650) 279-9954
 
n/a

260 Santa Ana Court
Sunnyvale, CA 94085
Former address if changed since last report
 
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
 
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
 
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
 
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
 
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated
Filer o
 
Accelerated
Accelerated Filer o
 
Non-Accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller Reporting Company
þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
¨ Yes x No
 
State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $59,624
As of March 1, 2010, the aggregate market value of the voting Common Stockand non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates cannot be calculatedcomputed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as there exists no market forof the quotationlast business day of the registrant’s securities.most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2010)—No sale or bid data was available as of that date.

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 889,533 shares ofregistrant's $.001 par value common stock as of March 1, 2010.
the close of business on the latest practicable date (March 22, 2011): 5,889,533

Documents incorporated by reference: None.
 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
   
ITEM 1.BUSINESS 3
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS  54
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS  105
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES  105
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS  105
ITEM 4.SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS[REMOVED AND RESERVED]  105
   
PART II
   
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES  115
ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 126
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION  126
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK  1711
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA  1711
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE  1923
ITEM 9A(T).9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES  1923
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION  2023
   
PART III
   
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  20
23
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  2125
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS  2225
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE  2326
ITEM 14PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES  2428
   
PART IV
   
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES  2529
   
SIGNATURES   2730

 
2

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Forward-Looking Statements
 
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”), including ”Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding future events and the future results of Intelligent Buying, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company”) that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions about the Company’s business. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “sees,” “estimates” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements due to numerous factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section in Item 1A, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 and elsewhere in this Report as well as those discussed from time to time in the Company’s other Securities and Exchange Commission filings and reports. In addition, such statements could be affected by general industry and market conditions. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date of that document, and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Report. If we update or correct one or more forward-looking statements, investors and others should not conclude that we will make additional updates or corrections with respect to other forward-looking statements.
 
PART I
 
ITEM 1.BUSINESS.
 
Background
 
Intelligent Buying, Inc. was incorporated in the State of California on March 22, 2004. On March 22, 2004, the Company issued 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (an aggregate of 20,000 shares) to its founders, Eugene Malobrodsky and David Gorodyansky for a cash consideration of $200. On March 22, 2006, the Company issued 1,250,000 shares of its Preferred Stock to each of Messrs. Malobrodsky and Gorodyansky (2,500,000 Preferred Shares in the aggregate) in exchange for the 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock which had been previously issued. Both prior to the exchange and at the time of the exchange, Messrs. Malobrodsky and Gorodyansky owned 100% of the stock of the Company. The decision to exchange their common shares for preferred shares was intended to enable them to maintain a particular percentage holding of the Company and enable them to maintain voting control over the Company. The 2,500,000 issued and outstanding Preferred Shares are convertibleOn September 16, 2010, all 2,500,00 shares of preferred stock were converted into 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Thereafter, no shares of preferred stock remained issued and outstanding.

Our Business Generally
 
The Company has been engaged since 2004 in the business of asset management and sales of high-end computerized networking equipment to emerging high technology companies. The focus of the Company’s business is to facilitate the liquidation of high-end networking equipment and information technology assets by businesses which are ceasing operations and to resell these assets to evolving technology companies at a fraction of the original cost. The Company sells products which include servers with multiple CPU’s, web servers, desktop and laptop computers, enterprise level switching equipment and routers. In this respect, the Company provides a valuable service to both the financial stakeholders of the selling businesses and the purchasers.

The Company is located in the heart of Silicon Valley and is therefore well-networked with venture capital firms which are the principal funding mechanism for the information technology industry. Venture funds comprise the Company’s most important contact with business opportunities. The principal categories of equipment sold by the Company comprise high-end switching and routing equipment. The manufacturers of equipment sold by the Company are generally also competitors for sales to the same buyers. The Company also has a major focus on the evolving Voice Over Internet Protocol (“VOIP”) industry and seeks to become a major provider of switches, routers and related information technology for this industry. To date, the principal focus of the Company has been Silicon Valley. In the future, the Company intends to expand nationally, and ultimately, internationally.

 
3
 

Our Market

Management believes that there exists a demand for networking, switching, routers and related information technology equipment in the world market. We believe that the significant growth in the use of VOIP equipment will continue and will comprise a major part of our business for the foreseeable future. While Silicon Valley is and has been our principal market, we see substantial demand for our products and services on the U.S. east coast and internationally, particularly in Asia and the ASEAN/India markets.

Market Description

The market for our products and services is highly-fragmented and there is presently no well-organized market for used information technology equipment and the re-marketing of the same. In this respect, at this time our market niche is essentially a “cottage industry” and our goal is to become the major player in the industry in the same manner as eBay has become the major player in the online auction industry. Our initial principal focus has been to work with the venture capital community as a vehicle for the orderly disposition of information technology equipment owned by companies which are or have ceased operations and to identify equipment which is required by emerging companies which have a need for this equipment. While we cannot quantify the gross size of this market, our experience is that this market niche is substantial and that it is largely underserved by entities with a specific focus on it. As the demand for high-quality information technology equipment grows, we believe that the demand for late-model used equipment will grow concurrently, if not at a faster pace. We believe that the demand may grow the fastest in markets outside the United States where there is a strong market acceptance for second-hand equipment and the general demand for such equipment has been growing at a faster pace than in the U.S. markets due to extensive outsourcing by American industry.

Competition

Our primary competition is the original manufacturers of the equipment we sell such as Cisco, Sun Microsystems and the like. Notwithstanding, we believe that we can work in concert with the manufacturers as a clearing house for excess products outside of their normal marketing channels. Our major competitive advantage is price, as our inventory is generally available to the public at prices which are substantially below the prices for new equipment. Our inventory is also available for immediate delivery. We do face competition from other online auction services such as eBay, Overstock.com and uBid.com. While we believe that our services are superior to these competitors due to our specialized focus on the market, these entities have financial and other resources which are, and will for the foreseeable future be, significantly greater than ours. We also face competition from many smaller entities and equipment retailers who have acted as brokers for the disposition of second-hand equipment. Most of these entities deal primarily with local markets and have limited financial resources, which tend to restrict the size and scope of their operations. The Company does not rely upon a single large customer or a high concentration of a few customers. Rather, the Company serves and markets to the general public and relies upon a large number of individual customers to comprise its sales. While the Company does not have a strong reliance on any one or concentration of a few select customers, marketing to the consumer audience may create the need for advertising and marketing to the general public, which may require significant time and expense with no guaranteed return in sales or customers.

Employees
 
As of December 31, 2009,2010, the Company had three employees.

 
4

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
 
Risk Factors

There are several material risks associated with the Company.  You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, which constitute all of the material risks relating to the Company.  If any of the following risks are realized, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed.  This means investors could lose all or a part of their investment.

RISKS RELATING TO THE BUSINESS

WE HAVE BEEN SUBJECT TO A GOING CONCERN OPINION FROM OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Our independent auditors have added an explanatory paragraph to their audit issued in connection with the financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2009, relative to our ability to continueNot required as a going concern.  We had negative working capital of $10,240 as of December 31, 2009 and we had an accumulated deficit of $680,090 incurred through December 31, 2009.  Because our auditors have issued a going concern opinion, there is substantial uncertainty we will continue operations in which case you could lose your investment.  Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an ongoing business for the next 12 months. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the uncertainty about our ability to continue our business. As such we may have to cease operations and investors could lose their entire investment.

WE HAVE NO PROFITABLE OPERATING HISTORY AND MAY NEVER ACHIEVE PROFITABILITY.

The Company commenced operations in 2004 and to date has operated on a relatively small scale. Through December 31. 2009, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $680,090 notwithstanding the fact that the founders and principal officers of the Company have worked without salary and the Company has operated with minimal overhead. We are an early stage company and haveis a limited history of operations and have not generated meaningful revenues from operations since our inception. We are faced with all of the risks associated with a company in the early stages of development. Our business is subject to numerous risks associated with a relatively new, low-capitalized company engaged in our business sector. Such risks include, but are not limited to, competition from well-established and well-capitalized companies, technological obsolescence and unanticipated difficulties regarding the marketing and sale of our inventory. There can be no assurance that we will ever generate significant commercial sales or achieve profitability. Should this be the case, our common stock could become worthless and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

DEPENDENCE UPON THE FOUNDERS, WITHOUT WHOSE SERVICES COMPANY BUSINESS OPERATIONS COULD CEASE

At this time, the sole officers and directors of the Company are the founders, Eugene Malobrodsky and David Gorodyansky, who are wholly responsible for the development and execution of our business.  The founders are under no contractual obligation to remain employed by us, although neither has any intent to leave. If either of the founders should choose to leave us for any reason before we have hired additional personnel our operations may fail. Even if we are able to find additional personnel, it is uncertain whether we could find qualified management who could develop our business along the lines described herein or would be willing to work for compensation the Company could afford.  Without such management, the Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.“smaller reporting company”.

 
54
 

OUR FOUNDERS AND SOLE OFFICERS DEVOTE ONLY FIVE TO TEN HOURS PER WEEK EACH TO THE COMPANY’S BUSINESS AND ARE ENGAGED IN OTHER BUSINESS ACTIVITIES

At this time, the sole officers and directors of the Company, Eugene Malobrodsky and David Gorodyansky, devote only five to ten hours per week to the Company’s business and are engaged at the same time as officers of AnchorFree Wireless, Inc.  The limited time devoted to the Company’s business could adversely affect the Company’s business operations and prospects for the future.  Without full-time devoted management, the Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

THE COMPANY IS HIGHLY DEPENDENT UPON A RELATED COMPANY FOR A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF ITS SALES

AnchorFree Wireless, Inc., a company controlled by the Company’s sole officers and directors, accounted for approximately 80.2% of the Company’s sales for the year ended December 31, 2009, but only approximately 1% of the Company’s sales for the year ended December 31, 2008.  These sales are integral to the viability of the Company, and without such sales, the Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

CONCENTRATED CONTROL RISKS; SHAREHOLDERS COULD BE UNABLE TO CONTROL OR INFLUENCE KEY CORPORATE ACTIONS OR EFFECT CHANGES IN THE COMPANY’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS OR MANAGEMENT

Our founders, Eugene Malobrodsky and David Gorodyansky, each own 1,250,000 shares of our preferred stock, which is convertible into an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of common stock. Assuming conversion of all shares of preferred stock, Messrs. Malobrodsky and Gorodyansky would hold approximately 84.88% of the Company’s common stock.  Prior to such conversion, Messrs. Malobrodsky and Gorodyansky control shares representing approximately 84.88% of the voting control of the Company.  In addition, Messrs. Malobrodsky and Gorodyansky are the sole officers and directors of the Company. Messrs. Malobrodsky and Gorodyansky therefore have the power to make all major decisions regarding our affairs, including decisions regarding whether or not to issue stock and for what consideration, whether or not to sell all or substantially all of our assets and for what consideration and whether or not to authorize more stock for issuance or otherwise amend our charter or bylaws. They are in a position to elect all of our directors and to dictate all of our policies. All of these actions could adversely affect the value of investors’ shares or investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

LACK OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS WITH KEY MANAGEMENT RISKING POTENTIAL OF THE LOSS OF THE COMPANY’S TOP MANAGEMENT

We do not currently have employment agreements with either of Messrs. Malobrodsky and Gorodyansky or key man insurance on the life of either of them. Our future success will depend in significant part on our ability to retain and hire key management personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel.  Without such management, the Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

LACK OF ADDITIONAL WORKING CAPITAL MAY CAUSE CURTAILMENT OF ANY EXPANSION PLANS WHILE RAISING OF CAPITAL THROUGH SALE OF EQUITYSECURITIES WOULD DILUTE EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS PERCENTAGE OF OWNERSHIP

The potential exists that our available capital resources may not be adequate to fund our working capital requirements based upon our present level of operations for the 12-month period subsequent to January 1, 2010. A shortage of capital would affect our ability to fund our working capital requirements. If we require additional capital, funds may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, if we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of these securities could dilute existing shareholders. If funds are not available, this could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

6

WE DO NOT PRESENTLY HAVE A TRADITIONAL CREDIT FACILITY WITH A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION. THIS ABSENCE MAY ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR OPERATIONS.

We do not presently have a traditional credit facility with a financial institution. The absence of a traditional credit facility with a financial institution could adversely impact our operations. If adequate funds are not otherwise available, we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate portions of our operations and product development efforts.  Without such credit facilities, the Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

OUR INABILITY TO SUCCESSFULLY ACHIEVE A CRITICAL MASS OF SALES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION.

No assurance can be given that we will be able to successfully achieve a critical mass of sales in order to cover our operating expenses and achieve sustainable profitability.  Without such critical mass of sales, the Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

MANY COMPANIES WITH GREATER RESOURCES AND OPERATING EXPERIENCE OFFER TECHNOLOGY SIMILAR TO THE PRODUCTS WE SELL. THESE COMPANIES COULD SUCCESSFULLY COMPETE WITH US ANDNEGATIVELY AFFECT OUR OPPORTUNITY TO ACHIEVE PROFITABILITY.

We operate in a competitive industry with many established and well-recognized competitors. In particular, Cisco Systems maintains a dominant position in the network switching industry and they compete directly with us with respect to the Cisco and other brand-name products we sell. We also compete with Extreme Networks, Juniper Networks, F5 Networks, Nortel Networks, Enterasys Networks, 3Com, Huawei Technologies, Force 10 Networks, and Actel, among others. Most of our competitors (including all of the competitors referenced above) have substantially greater market leverage, distribution networks, and vendor relationships, longer operating histories and industry experience, greater financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources, more name recognition and larger installed customer bases than we do and potentially may react strongly to our marketing efforts. In addition, many competitors exist which, because of their substantial resources, distribution relationships and customer base, could temporarily drop prices to be more competitive with our Company. Other competitive responses might include, without limitation, intense and aggressive price competition and offers of employment to our key marketing or management personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in the face of increasing competition from existing or new competitors, or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  If we are not successful in competing with our competitors, the Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

OUR SALES AND MARKETING EFFORTS HAVE YIELDED LIMITED REVENUES AND THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT OUR FUTURE SALES AND MARKETING EFFORTS WILL LEAD TO SALES OF OUR PRODUCTS.

Our sales and marketing efforts have yielded limited revenues to date and we believe we will have to significantly expand our sales and marketing capabilities in order to establish sufficient awareness to launch broader sales of our products and support services. There can be no assurance that we will be able to expand our sales and marketing efforts to the extent we believe necessary or that any such efforts, if undertaken, will be successful in achieving substantial sales of our products or support services.  If we are unable to expand our sales and marketing efforts, the Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

7

THE INDUSTRY OF NETWORK SWITCH PRODUCTS IS SUBJECT TO RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE. OUR INVENTORY OF PRODUCTS COULD BECOME OBSOLETE AT ANY TIME AND OUR LIMITED CAPITAL PROHIBITS US FROM DEVOTING A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF RESOURCES TO REPLACEMENT OF SUCH INVENTORY.

Evolving technology, updated industry standards, and frequent new product and service introductions characterize the network switching market, which represents one of our principal markets. Our current inventory could become obsolete at any time. Competitors could develop new products similar to or better than those in our inventory, which would render our inventory obsolete or significantly impact the value of our inventory. In order to be competitive, we must continue to acquire new products that offer state of the art technology at lower price points than our competitors.  If we are unable to provide state-of-the-art products for sale, the Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

THE AVERAGE SELLING PRICES OF OUR PRODUCTS, AND OUR GROSS MARGINS RESULTING FROM THE SALE OF SUCH PRODUCTS, MAY DECLINE AS A RESULT OF COMPETITIVE PRESSURES, INDUSTRY TRENDS AND OTHER FACTORS.

The network industry has experienced an erosion of the average product selling prices due to a number of factors, particularly competitive and macroeconomic pressures and rapid technological advancements. Our competitors have and will likely continue to lower sales prices from time to time in order to gain market share or create more demand. We may have to reduce the sales prices of our products in response to such intense pricing competition, which could cause our gross margins to decline and may adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition.  If we cannot maintain adequate profit margins on the sales of our products, the Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

OUR SUCCESS IS SUBSTANTIALLY DEPENDENT ON GENERAL ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND BUSINESS TRENDS, PARTICULARLY IN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY, A DOWNTURN OF WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR OPERATIONS.

The success of our operations depends to a significant extent upon a number of factors relating to business spending. These factors include economic conditions such as employment rates and labor supply, general business conditions, cost of goods and materials, inflation, interest rates and taxation. Our business is affected by the general condition and economic stability of our customers as well as our vendors, suppliers and partners and their continued willingness to work with us in the future. Our business is particularly sensitive to information technology ("IT") spending patterns and preferences. There can be no assurance that IT spending will not be adversely affected by general business trends and economic conditions, thereby impacting our growth, net sales and profitability. An overall decline in the demand for information technology spending could cause a reduction in our sales and the Company could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock or other securities could lose their entire investment.

OUR FAILURE TO MANAGE GROWTH EFFECTIVELY COULD IMPAIR OUR SUCCESS.

In order for us to expand successfully, management will be required to anticipate the changing demands of a growth in operations, should such growth occur, and to adapt systems and procedures accordingly. There can be no assurance that we will anticipate all of the changing demands that a potential expansion in operations might impose. If we were to experience rapid growth, we might be required to hire and train a large number of sales and support personnel, and there can be no assurance that the training and supervision of a large number of new employees would not adversely affect the high standards that we seek to maintain. Our future will depend, in part, on our ability to integrate new individuals and capabilities into our operations, should such operations expand in the future, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve such integration. We will also need to continually evaluate the adequacy of our management information systems, including our web site. Failure to upgrade our information systems or unexpected difficulties encountered with these systems during an expansion in our operations (should such an expansion occur) could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

8

CHANGES IN GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES COULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION, CASH FLOWS, REVENUE AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

We are subject to changes in and interpretations of financial accounting matters that govern the measurement of our performance. Based on our reading and interpretations of relevant guidance, principles or concepts issued by, among other authorities, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, our management believes that our current contract terms and business arrangements have been properly reported. However, there continue to be issued interpretations and guidance for applying the relevant standards to a wide range of contract terms and business arrangements that are prevalent in the industries in which we operate. Future interpretations or changes by the regulators of existing accounting standards or changes in our business practices could result in future changes in our revenue recognition and/or other accounting policies and practices that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, revenue and results of operations.

RISKS RELATED TO THIS OWNERSHIP OF OUR SHARES

THERE IS CURRENTLY NO MARKET FOR OUR SECURITIES AND THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT ANY MARKET WILL EVER DEVELOP OR THAT OUR COMMON STOCK WILL BE LISTED FOR TRADING

As of the date hereof, there has not been any established trading market for our common stock and there is currently no market for our securities. We intend to seek to have a market maker file an application with the NASD on our behalf to list the shares of our common stock on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board ("OTCBB") or similar quotation service when we have a sufficient number of shareholders, if ever. There can be no assurance as to whether such market makers application will be accepted or, if accepted, the prices at which our common stock will trade if a trading market develops, of which there can be no assurance. We are not permitted to file such application on our own behalf. Until our common stock is fully distributed and an orderly market develops, (if ever) in our common stock, the price at which it trades is likely to fluctuate significantly. Prices for our common stock will be determined in the marketplace and may be influenced by many factors, including the depth and liquidity of the market for shares of our common stock, developments affecting our business, including the impact of the factors referred to elsewhere in these Risk Factors, investor perception of the Company and general economic and market conditions. No assurances can be given that an orderly or liquid market will ever develop for the shares of our Common stock. Owing to the anticipated low price of the securities, many brokerage firms may not be willing to effect transactions in the securities. See "Broker-dealers may be discouraged from effecting transactions in our common stock because they are considered a penny stock and are subject to the penny stock rules.”  

NO ESTABLISHED MARKET PRICE FOR THE SHARES

Currently, there is no established market for our stock.  As a result, the price previously paid for shares of the Company’s common stock may not be indicative of the price of our stock that will prevail in the trading market. You may be unable to sell your shares of common stock at or above your purchase price, which may result in substantial losses to you. Moreover, in the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management's attention and resources.

SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK ELIGIBLE, OR TO BECOME ELIGIBLE, FOR PUBLIC SALE COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR STOCK PRICE AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR US TO RAISE ADDITIONAL CAPITAL THROUGH SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

We cannot predict the effect, if any, that market sales of shares of our common stock or the availability of shares of common stock for sale will have on the market price prevailing from time to time. As of this date, the major portion of our outstanding securities are restricted under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  We also have outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock which will convert into approximately 5,000,000 shares of common stock. Sales of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Any adverse effect on the market price of our common stock could make it difficult for us to raise additional capital through sales of equity securities at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate.

9

BROKER-DEALERS MAY BE DISCOURAGED FROM EFFECTING TRANSACTIONS IN OUR COMMON STOCK SHARES BECAUSE THEY MAY BE CONSIDERED A “PENNY STOCK” AND ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPLICABLE PENNY STOCK RULES

Rules 15g-1 through 15g-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act impose sales practice and disclosure requirements on certain brokers-dealers who engage in certain transactions involving a “penny stock.”  Subject to certain exceptions, a penny stock generally includes any non-NASDAQ equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share. There is currently no established price quotation for our shares, however, we expect that initial quotations will not exceed $5.00 and there is the possibility that the quoted shares price may never exceed $5.00, and that our common stock will be deemed penny stock for the purposes of the Exchange Act.  The additional sales practice and disclosure requirements imposed upon brokers-dealers may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our common stock, which could severely limit the market liquidity of the stock and impede the sale of our stock in the secondary market.  Specifically, any broker-dealer selling penny stock to anyone other than an established customer or “accredited investor,” generally, an individual with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or an annual income exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with his or her spouse, must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and must receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to sale, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt.  In addition, the penny stock regulations require the broker-dealer to deliver, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the penny stock market, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt.  A broker-dealer is also required to disclose commissions payable to the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities.  Finally, a broker-dealer is required to send monthly statements disclosing recent price information with respect to the penny stock held in a customer’s account and information with respect to the limited market in penny stocks.

WE HAVE NEVER PAID ANY DIVIDENDS AND DO NOT INTEND TO DO SO IN THE FUTURE
We have never paid a dividend to our shareholders, and we intend to retain our cash for the continued development of our business. We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.  As a result, your return on investment will be solely determined by your ability to sell your shares in a secondary market.

FOR ALL OF THE FOREGOING REASONS AND OTHERS SET FORTH HEREIN, AN INVESTMENT IN THE COMPANY'S SECURITIES IN ANY MARKET WHICH MAY DEVELOP IN THE FUTURE INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
 
None.
 
ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES.
 
Our Company currently maintains its executive offices at 260 Santa Ana Court Sunnyvale,450 National Ave Mountain View, CA 94085.94043. . At this time, the Company occupies this space on the basis of an oral month-to-month lease at a rental of $1,500.00 per month. The Company expects to enter into a more formal lease arrangement in the future.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
As of December 31, 2009,2010, the Company was not a party to any pending or threatened legal proceedings.
 
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS[REMOVED AND RESERVED]
 
No matters were submitted to a vote or for the written consent of security shareholders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and no meeting of shareholders was held.

10

PART II
 
ITEM 5.        MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY; RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
 
Market Price

There is no public market forIn 2010, our common stock and no public market may ever develop. While we will seekwas approved by FINRA to obtaintrade on the OTCBB under the symbol “INTB” on an unpriced basis. There has never been a market maker after the effective date of this prospectus to applyquotation for the inclusion of our common stock in the OTCBB, we may not be successful in our efforts and owners of our common stock may not have a market in whichit has yet to sell the same.actively trade. Even if the common stock were quoted, in a market, there may never be substantial activity in such market, if there is substantial activity, such activity may not be maintained, and no prediction can be made as to what prices may prevail in such market.

Holders

As of March 1, 2010,22, 2011, we have issued an aggregate of 889,5335,889,533 shares of our common stock to approximately 3739 stockholders of record. The issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in accordance with the exemptions from registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act. 389,533 shares of the Company’s common stock were registered under a registration statement on Form SB-2 which was declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on January 15, 2008.

Options and Warrants
 
None of the shares of our common stock are subject to outstanding options or warrants.
 
Status of Outstanding Common Stock
 
As of December 31, 2009, 753,3332010, 5,753,333 of our 889,5335,889,533 issued and outstanding common shares are held by “affiliates” of the Company and the remaining shares are either registered or may be transferred subject to the requirements of Rule 144. We have not agreed to register any additional outstanding shares of our common stock under the Securities Act.

 
5

Dividends
 
We have not paid any dividends to date, and have no plans to do so in the immediate future.
 
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.
 
Purchases of Equity Securities
 
The Company has never purchased nor does it own any equity securities of any other issuer.

 
11

ITEM 6.      SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
Year Ended 12/31/09  12/31/08  12/31/07  12/31/10  12/31/09  12/31/08 
Revenues $59,624  $518,296  $160,115  $41,063  $59,624  $518,296 
Net Income (Loss) $1,046  $15,113  $(28,065) $(2,015) $1,046  $(15,113)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share, Basic and Diluted $0.00  $1.70  $(0.03) $(0.00) $0.00  $(0.017)
Weighted Average No. Shares, Basic and Diluted  889,533   889,533   889,533   2,355,286   889,533   889,533 
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) $(680,090) $(680,336) $(695,449) $(682,105) $(680,090) $(680,336)
Total Assets $9,172  $1,916  $8,124  $926  $9,172  $1,916 
Total Liabilities $19,412  $12,402  $33,723  $13,181  $19,412  $12,402 
 
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
 
Overview
 
The Company has been engaged since 2004 in the business of asset management and sales of high-end computerized networking equipment to emerging high technology companies. The focus of the Company’s business is to facilitate the liquidation of high-end networking equipment and information technology assets by businesses which are ceasing operations and to resell these assets to evolving technology companies at a fraction of the original cost. In this respect, the Company provides a valuable service to both the financial stakeholders of the selling businesses and the purchasers.

Our Company is subject to the risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in the highly competitive market for information technology equipment as well as the uncertainty generally associated with the online auction market. These risks include the decline in demand for the Company’s inventory, unavailability of products at prices which will support the Company’s business plan, if at all, pricing compression in the market for new information technology equipment among major manufacturers, inability to provide appropriate service for products sold, lack of funds to purchase new inventory and inability to turn accounts receivable in a timely manner and the inability to maintain and increase the levels of traffic on our online services, among others.

Plan of Operations

a.      General

The extent of our operations over the next twelve (12) months will be determined by our ability to access and purchase new inventory on terms which are attractive in the market and consistent with our business plan. As we expand our business, this will require a continuing access to additional capital, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to access such capital on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. While we cannot predict exactly what our level of activity will be over the next 12 months, past experience leads us to believe that available capital resources will not be adequate to fund working capital requirements for the 12-month period which commenced January 1, 2010.2011.

6
 

We will attempt to not incur any cash obligations that we cannot satisfy with known resources, which are currently very limited.

The Company does not believe that period-to-period comparisons of its operating results are necessarily meaningful nor should they be relied upon as reliable indicators of future performance, thus making it difficult to accurately forecast quarterly and annual revenues and results of operations. In addition, our operating results are likely to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, and year-to-year, as a result of several factors, many of which are outside our control, and any of which could materially harm our business. These factors include:

· fluctuations in the demand for high-end information technology equipment such as networking equipment and routers;
· the unpredictability of our success in any new revenue and cost reduction initiatives;
· inability to acquire new inventory on terms which will result in acceptable profit margins on sale;
· obsolescence of our inventory;
· changes in the level of traffic on our website; and

12

· fluctuations in marketing expenses and technology infrastructure costs.

Our revenues for the foreseeable future will remain primarily dependent on our ability to acquire inventory on a continuing basis and the demand for such information technology equipment in the marketplace and user traffic levels on our website. As aforesaid, future revenues are difficult to forecast. The Company may be unable to adjust spending quickly enough to offset any unexpected increase in demand for the product lines of the Company or a reduction in revenues in a particular quarter or year, which may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

b.      Expansion Plans

Our initial activities were largely focused on the Silicon Valley market. Since Silicon Valley is the most important information technology market in the United States, we expect that this will be our principal market for the foreseeable future. We hope to expand the scope of such activities to the U.S. east coast and thereafter, assuming that domestic operations are meeting our business plans, we would hope to expand internationally, with particular focus on Asia and the ASEAN/India markets. This expansion will obviously be subject to our ability to access additional capital and establish contacts and recruit qualified personnel in the new markets. The raising of such additional capital could be on a basis which is dilutive to our then-existing shareholder base.

c.      Current and Anticipated Expenses

The Company has embarked upon an effort to become a publicly-traded company and by doing so, has incurred and will continue to incur additional significant expenses for legal, accounting and related services. Once the Company becomes a public entity, subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, there will be ongoing expenses associated with the ongoing professional fees for accounting, legal and a host of other expenses for annual reports and proxy statements as well as costs to be incurred for (i) increased marketing and advertising to support any growth in sales for the Company; (ii) potential to hire additional personnel to manage and expand the Company's operations. Current monthly expenses to run the Company average approximately $5,000. Future monthly expenses will be largely dependent on available cash.

d.      Officers’ Compensation and Loans

Neither Mr. Malobrodsky nor Mr. Gorodyansky has received or accrued any compensation to date and has no written contract or any commitment to receive annual compensation. Messrs. Malobrodsky and Gorodyansky have agreed to forego any salary until such time as the Company has sufficient revenues therefore and/or receives sufficient outside financing.

7

In the past, our founders have advanced funds to the Company as required. If, and when necessary, our founders may, at their sole option, advance funds to cover additional working capital as deemed necessary. These funds are not expected to exceed $100,000, will be evidenced by a non-interest bearing unsecured corporate note, and will be treated as loans to be repaid, if and when we have the financial resources to do so.

During fiscal year 2004, Sophia Malobrodsky made a non-interest-bearing loan advance to the Company, payable on demand, in the amount of $38,000. On January 2, 2006, the Company agreed to exchange the outstanding balance of $38,000 for 253,333 shares of the Company’s common stock ($0.15 per share). While the Company was committed to issue these shares at January 2, 2006, these shares were not physically issued until March 22, 2006 because the Company needed to increase its authorized capital and engage a transfer agent in order to facilitate the physical issuance of the shares.

During fiscal year 2005, Ilya Perlov made a non-interest-bearing loan advance to the Company, payable on demand, in the amount of $3,000. On January 2, 2006, the Company agreed to exchange the outstanding balance of $3,000 for 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock ($0.15 per share). While the Company was committed to issue these shares at January 2, 2006, these shares were not physically issued until March 22, 2006 because the Company needed to increase its authorized capital and engage a transfer agent in order to facilitate the physical issuance of the shares.

13

On January 2, 2006, Ms. Malobrodsky and Mr. Perlov made demand for repayment of these obligations. At the time, the Company did not have the funds available for such repayment and the obligations were deemed to be in default. At that time, the Company had not completed its private placement and there was no guarantee that it would be completed on a timely basis, if at all. As a result, Ms. Malobrodsky agreed to exchange the outstanding balance of the outstanding loan advance ($38,000) owed by the Company to her for 253,333 shares of common stock and Mr. Perlov agreed to exchange the outstanding balance of the outstanding loan advance ($3,000) owed by the Company to him for 20,000 shares of common stock, both at an exchange rate of one share for each $0.15 of debt. The $0.15 per share conversion price was negotiated at that time on an arms-length basis between Ms. Malobrodsky, Mr. Perlov and the Company which took into account a number of factors, including but not limited to (a) the conversion of obligations which had priority over common equity to a common equity position which is pari-passu with all other equity holders; (b) the illiquidity of the Company at the time (as of December 31, 2005, the Company only had $2,197 cash); (c) the Company believed that the obligations to Ms. Malobrodsky and Mr. Perlov needed to be eliminated in order to complete any private placement of common equity and (d) the Company knew that the prospective investors in the private placement would not permit any of the proceeds of such offering to be utilized for payments to the noteholders. While the Company was committed to issue these shares at January 2, 2006, these shares were not physically issued until March 22, 2006 because the Company needed to increase its authorized capital and engage a transfer agent in order to facilitate the physical issuance of the shares. The shares issued to Ms. Malobrodsky and Mr. Perlov were valued at $.75 per share and the accounting treatment of the exchange was to debit Notes Payable and credit Common Stock par value and Additional Paid-In Capital.

While we cannot predict exactly what our level of activity will be over the next 12 months, past experience leads us to believe that available capital resources will not be adequate to fund working capital requirements for the 12-month period which commenced January 1, 2009.2011. We will therefore need to access additional capital through the issuance of additional equity and debt securities and other forms of outside funding, including additional loans from officers, directors and shareholders of the Company. There is no assurance can be accomplished to the necessary extent, if at all. (See "Liquidity").

Liquidity

As of December 31, 2009,2010, we had $1,672$926 in cash and $5,000 in accounts receivableno other assets and a negative net working capital of $10,240.
$12,255.

 
148

From its inception, the Company’s basic business model has been to serve the venture capital community and the information technology firms they fund for both the acquisition of information technology equipment at prices below the factory sale pricing and the disposition/liquidation of such equipment for purposes of recovery of capital investment. The two aspects of this strategy have been (i) to purchase, at liquidation pricing, computer equipment owned by information technology firms which are either ceasing or reducing operations or are merging with other entities with a resulting duplication of equipment and (ii) to facilitate early stage information technology firms acquisition of computer equipment at prices which are less than the cost of new equipment. Venture Capital Funds have been the Company’s target market as they are the principal source of funding for companies which would be most likely to utilize the Company’s services. The key elements of the Company’s strategy are (i) identification of opportunities to acquire equipment, generally in connection with a liquidation of the assets of an information technology company; (ii) acquisition of equipment which has resale value at prices which will facilitate a margin of 40-50% on resale; (iii) access to capital to acquire equipment assets for resale; (iv) resale of the equipment through various channels in a manner which will facilitate a rapid turn-around of funding; (v) to reduce general and administrative expenses to not more than 15-20% of sales revenues and (vi) maintaining lines of communication with entities who would make decisions relating to equipment purchases and divestitures. While all of the risk factors described in this registration statement apply, the Company believes that its most significant challenge to achievement of viable, long term profitability is access to capital. The Company is essentially a cash business. The Company can acquire equipment at the most favorable basis where it can pay cash at the point of purchase. The Company believes that access to additional capital will enable it to purchase equipment on the most favorable basis and enable the Company to achieve margins within targeted ranges. The Company’s operating expenses are reasonably predictable as literally all of its sales are on a cash basis through online or other auction-type channels. Further, the Company’s operating expenses do not tend to vary in relationship to sales volume. Therefore, the Company believes that as sales volume increases, so should its margin of profit. Given its current cash position, the Company believes it is questionable whether it can manage expenditures to generate sufficient cash to support its operations for the next twelve months. In this regard, the Company’s net incomeCompany’ suffered a loss of $(2,015) for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2009 was only $1,046,2010, while we had a negative net working capital at said date of $10,240.$12,255. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009,2010, the Company’s operating activities used $7,698provided $2,310 cash and the Company’s financing activities providedused cash in the amount of $7,463.$3,056. The major strategic challenge facing the Company is therefore the funding of growth—most particularly, the ability to acquire more inventory for re-sale. The Company believes that for the foreseeable future, the availability of equipment for purchase in its target markets will significantly exceed its financial resources and that the market for used information technology equipment, both in the U.S. and abroad, will continue to be strong and may even be growing. While the Company believes that it may be able to access asset-based working capital lending, this would be limited in amount and would only support current liquidity and would not be a viable source of funding for longer term growth. The Company believes that such funding can only achieved through sale of additional equity. A critical element of success in raising such funding is the liquidity of the Company’s common stock. The need for such liquidity is one of the principal reasons why the Company is seeking to become a reporting company and have its shares publicly-traded. While there are no guarantees that it can be achieved, the Company believes that such funding can be accessed in amounts which will enable the Company to achieve growth in its sales and the achievement of long term profitability.

The potential exists that our available capital resources may not be adequate to fund our working capital requirements based upon our present level of operations for the 12-month period subsequent to January 1, 2010.2011. A shortage of capital would affect our ability to fund our working capital requirements. If we require additional capital, funds may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, if we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of these securities could dilute existing shareholders. If funds are not available, this could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Historically, we have depended on loans from our principal shareholders and their families and acquaintances to provide us with working capital as required. We do not have any credit facilities or other commitments for debt or equity financing. No assurance can be given that financing, when needed, will be available. To date, we have had discussions with potential sources of additional funding, however, the Company does not currently have any firm commitment with respect thereto. None of our shareholders is obligated to make any loans or advances to us and there can be no assurance that any of our shareholders will continue making loans or advances to us in the future.

9

To meet commitments that are greater than 12 months in the future, we will have to operate our business in such a manner as produce positive cash flow and enhance our exposure in the market. There does not currently appear to be any other viable source of long-term financing except that management may consider various sources of debt and/or equity financing if same can be obtained on terms deemed reasonable to management.

Going Concern. Our independent auditors have added an explanatory paragraph to their audit issued in connection with the financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2009,2010, relative to our ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s total liabilities exceeded its total assets by $10,240.$12,255. We had an accumulated deficit of $680,090$682,105 incurred through such date and recorded a profitloss of only $246$2,015 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.2010. Because our auditors have issued a going concern opinion, there is substantial uncertainty we will continue operations in which case you could lose your investment. Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an ongoing business for the next 12 months. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the uncertainty about our ability to continue our business.

15

Results of Operations for Comparative Years Ended December 31, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009

The following table summarizes the results of operations during the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:


Line Item 
12/31/08
(audited)
  
12/31/07
(audited)
  
Increase
(Decrease)
  
Percentage
Increase
(Decrease)
  
12/31/10
(audited)
  
12/31/09
(audited)
  
Increase
(Decrease)
  
Percentage
Increase
(Decrease)
 
                        
Sales $59,624  $518,296  $(458,672) (88.5)% $41,063  $59,624  $(17,561)  (29.4)%
Net income (loss) 246  15,113  (14,867) (98.4)%  (2,015)  246   (2,261)  (919)%
Expenses 58,584  502,383  (443,799) (88.3)%  43,078   58,584   (15,506)  (26.5)%
Earnings (loss) per share of common stock 0.00  1.70  (1.70) (100)%  (0.00)  0.00   0.00   (n/a 

Comparisons between Cost of Sales Selling, Administrative and General Expenses for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 20092010 and for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 20082009 are as follows:

  
12 Mos.
Ended
12/31/2010
  
12 Mos. Ended
12/31/2009
 
Cost of Sales $9,153  $35,863 
Ratio of Cost of Sales to Sales  22.3%  60.1%
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses $33,925  $22,639 
  
12 Mos.
Ended
12/31/2009
  
12 Mos. Ended
12/31/2008
 
Cost of Sales $35,863  $444,548 
Ratio of Cost of Sales to Sales  60.1%  85.8%
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses $22,639  $57,835 
10

We had a net loss of $2,015 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 as compared with net income of $246 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 as compared with net income of $15,113 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008.2009. This improvement was largely due to an increase in sales and a small decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses.

The Company’s sales in any given period is significantly affected by the working capital the Company has available for the purchase of inventory. The Company is known in Silicon Valley, California, as a liquidator of used computer equipment. The principal source of the Company’s business leads are Venture Capital firms who have invested in information technology companies which have either ceased or reduced operations or have gone through a business combination which results in the surviving company having duplicative equipment. The Company also generally monitors the information technology industry to identify target companies who might be in the market to liquidate to sell equipment. The principal limitation on the Company’s ability to purchase equipment is the availability and access to funds to complete the purchase of inventory. The Company’s sales are at least partially dependent on its ability to acquire inventory. Simply put, without inventory, the Company has nothing to sell. While the Company can technically act as a “middle-man” between the entity divesting equipment and the re-sale market without directly purchasing the equipment, it has found that it cannot achieve the margins on sales by so doing that it achieves by purchasing the equipment outright and acting as a principal on the re-sale as opposed to an agent

16

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to an investor in our securities.
 
Seasonality
 
Our operating results are not affected by seasonality.
 
Inflation
 
Our business and operating results are not affected in any material way by inflation.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
The Securities and Exchange Commission issued Financial Reporting Release No. 60, "Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies" suggesting that companies provide additional disclosure and commentary on their most critical accounting policies. In Financial Reporting Release No. 60, the Securities and Exchange Commission has defined the most critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of a company's financial condition and operating results, and require management to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. The nature of our business generally does not call for the preparation or use of estimates. Due to the fact that the Company does not have any operating business, we do not believe that we do not have any such critical accounting policies.
 
ITEM 7A.      QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide information required by this Item.

ITEM 8.         FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 
Set forth below are the audited financial statements for the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20092010 and 20082009 and the reports thereon of Paritz & Co.

 
1711

INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INDEX

 Page Number
  
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORTF-1
  
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: 
  
Balance SheetSheets at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009F-2
  
Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009F-3
  
Statement of Stockholders' Deficiency for period the years endedfrom December 31, 2009 and 2008 to December 31, 2010F-4
  
Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 20092010 and 20082009F-5
  
Notes to Financial Statements for period ended December 31, 20092010F-6 to F-11F-10

 
1812
 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Intelligent Buying, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Intelligent Buying, Inc. as of December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, and the related statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 20092010 and 2008.2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Intelligent Buying, Inc. as of December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 20092010 and 20082009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred operating losses since inception and has a net capital deficit at December 31, 2009,2010, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plan in regard to these matters is also discussed in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Paritz & Co.

Paritz & Co.
Hackensack, NJ
March 10, 201023, 2011

 
F-1

INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.

BALANCEINC.BALANCE SHEET

 
December 31, 2009
(Audited)
  
December 31, 2008
(Audited)
  
December 31,2010
(Audited)
  
December 31, 2009
(Audited)
 
CURRENT ASSETS            
Cash $1,672  $1,902  $926  $1,672 
Accounts receivable  5,000           5,000 
Inventories  2,500   —       2,500 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS  9,172   1,902   926   9,172 
                
Property and equipment, net  —   14   -   - 
                
TOTAL ASSETS $9,172  $1,916  $926  $9,172 
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY                
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $7,339  $7,792  $6,440  $7,339 
Due to related party  12,073   4,610   6,741   12,073 
        
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES  19,412   12,402   13,181   19,412 
                
STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIENCY):        
Preferred stock (Note 5), $.001 par value, Authorized – 25,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding – 2,500,000 shares  2,500   2,500 
Common stock, $.001 par value, Authorized – 50,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding – 889,533 shares  889   889 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY):        
Preferred stock (Note 5), $.001 par value,
Authorized – 25,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding – -0- on December 31, 2010 and 2,500,000 on December 31, 2009
  2,500   2,500 
Common stock, $.001 par value,
Authorized – 50,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding – 5,889,533 on December 31, 2010 and 889,533 on December 31, 2009
  889   889 
Additional paid-in capital  666,461   666,461   666,461   666,461 
Accumulated deficit  (680,090)  (680,336)  (682,105)  (680,090)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIENCY)  (10,240)  (10,486)  (12,255)  (10,240)
                
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIENCY) $9,172  $1,916  $926  $9,172 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 
F-2

INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT

 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 
 
2009
(Audited)
  
2008
(Audited)
  
2010
(Audited)
  
2009
(Audited)
 
            
SALES:            
Related Party  47,821   6,795  $38,616  $47,821 
Other  11,803   511,501   2,447   11,803 
TOTAL SALES  59,624   518,296   41,063   59,624 
                
COSTS AND EXPENSES:                
Cost of sales  35,863   444,548   9,153   35,863 
Selling, general and administrative  22,639   57,835   33,925   22,639 
Interest  82   —       82 
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES  58,584   502,383   43,078   58,584 
                
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES  1,046   15,913 
Gain on Disposal of Equipment      6 
        
(LOSS) BEFORE TAXES  (2,015)  1,046 
                
INCOME TAXES  800   800       800 
NET INCOME (LOSS)  246   15,113 
        
NET (LOSS)  (2,015)  246 
                
ACCUMULATED DEFICIT- BEGINNING OF PERIOD  (680,336)  (695,449)  (680,090)  (680,336)
                
ACCUMULATED DEFICIT- END OF PERIOD  (680,090)  (680,336) $(682,105) $(680,090)
                
BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE  0.00   0.02  $(0.00) $0.00 
                
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING  889,533   889,533   2,355,286   889,533 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 
F-3

INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
 
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

  —Common Stock—  —Preferred Stock—          
  Shares  
$.001
Par
Value
  Shares  
$.001
Par
Value
  
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  
Accumulated
Deficit
  Total 
                       
Balance –  January 1, 2005  20,000  $-   -  $-  $200  $(34,677) $(34,477)
                                
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (24,031)  (24,031)
                              
Balance – December 31, 2005  20,000   -   -   -   200   (58,708)  (58,508)
                              
Issuance of common stock  889,533   889   -   -   666,261   -   218,651 
                              
Conversion of common stock to Preferred Stock  (20,000)  -   2,500,000   2,500   -   -   2,500 
                              
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (698,676)  (160,176)
                              
Balance – December 31, 2006  889,533  $889   2,500,000  $2,500  $666,461  $(667,384) $2,467 
                              
Net loss                      (28,065)  (28,065)
                              
Balance December 31, 2007  889,533  $889   2,500,000  $2,500  $666,461  $(695,449) $(25,599)
Net income                      15,113   15,113 
                             
Balance December 31, 2008  889,533  $889   2,500,000  $2,500  $666,461  $(680,336) $(10,486)
Net Income                            
                       246   246 
Balance December 31, 2009  889,533  $889   2,500,000  $2,500  $666,461  $(680,090) $(10,240)
  Common Stock  Preferred Stock          
  Shares  
$.001
Par
Value
  Shares  
$.001
Par
Value
  
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  
Accumulated
Deficit
  Total 
                      
Balance December 31, 2008  889,533  $889   2,500,000  $2,500  $666,461  $(680,336) $(10,486)
                             
Net income                            246   246 
                             
Balance December 31, 2009  889,533  $889   2,500,000  $2,500  $666,461  $(680,090) $( 10,240)
                             
Net income                           (2,015)  (2,015)
                              
Balance December 31, 2010  889,533  $889   2,500,000  $2,500  $666,461  $(682,105) $( 12,255)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


 
F-4
 

INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 
  2009  2008 
       
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:      
Net income (loss)  246   15,113 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
        
 Cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  9   573 
Stock-based compensation expense        
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (5,000)  3,821 
Inventory  (2,500)  968 
Prepaid expenses and sundry current assets        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  (453)  (19,483)
Taxes payable  —   (510)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED) IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES  (7,698)  482 
         
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Gain on disposal of equipment  6   — 
NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES  6   — 
         
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Repayments of (advances to) shareholder        
Advances (Repayments) from related party  7,462   (1,328)
Proceeds from notes payable – related parties  —   — 
Issuance of common stock  —   — 
Issuance of preferred stock  —   — 
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES  7,462   (1,328)
         
DECREASE IN CASH  (230)  (846)
         
CASH– BEGINNING OF PERIOD  1,902   2,748 
CASH– END OF PERIOD  1,672   1,902 
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 
  2010  2009 
       
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:      
Net income (loss) $(2,015) $246 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
        
Depreciation and amortization      9 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  5,000   (5,000)
Inventory  2,500   (2,500)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses        
Taxes Payable  (3,175)  (453)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED) IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES  2,310   (7,698)
         
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Gain on disposal of Equipment      6 
NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES      6 
         
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Repayments from related party  (3,056)  7,462 
         
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES  (3,056)  7,462 
         
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH  (746)  (230)
         
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS – BEGINNING OF PERIOD  1,672   1,902 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS – END OF PERIOD  926   1,672 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
         
CASH PAID DURING PERIOD:        
Income taxes  -   - 
Interest expense  -   - 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 
F-5
 

INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 20092010
(AUDITED)

1.   
1.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business description

The financial statements presented are those of Intelligent Buying, Inc. (the “Company”).  The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of California on March 22, 2004 and is in the business of acquiring high-end computer and networking equipment from resellers and end-users and then reselling this equipment at discounted prices.

Uses of estimates in the preparation of financial statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses during each reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue on a gross basis when it is realized or realizable and earned.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been shipped or the services have been provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.  The Company reduces revenue for estimated customer returns, rotations and sales rebates when such amounts are estimable.  When not estimable, The Company defers revenue until the product is sold to the end customer.  The Company does not provide support on products sold unless a separate agreement for installation and setup has been entered into.  The revenue from such an agreement would be reported separately as fee income if and when such services are performed, completed and accepted by the customer.

Comprehensive income

SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income," establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. SFAS No. 130 requires that all items required to be recognized under accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be reported in a financial statement with the same prominence as other financial statements. Comprehensive income consists of net earnings, the net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale marketable securities, foreign currency translation adjustments, minimum pension liability adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting and is presented in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity in accordance with SFAS No. 130.During the years ended December 31 20092010 and 20082009 the Company did not have any components of comprehensive income (loss) to report.

F-6

INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010
(AUDITED)

1.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CON’T)

Net loss per share

Authoritative guidance on Earnings per Share, requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings or loss per share (“EPS”) for all entities with complex capital structures and requires a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic EPS computation to the numerator and denominator of the diluted EPS computation.  Basic EPS excludes dilution; diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity.

 
F-6

INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009
(AUDITED)

1.   SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CON’T)

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if dilutive securities and other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company, unless the effect is to reduce a loss or increase earnings per share.

Stock-based compensation

The Company has adopted the relevantFASB standard on Share-Based Payments, which addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions. The standard eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using old standards, and generally requires instead that such transactions be accounted and recognized in the statement of operations based on their fair value. The standard is effective for public companies that file as small business issuers as of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005.  Depending upon the number of and terms for options that may be granted in future periods, the implementation of this standard could have a significant non-cash impact on results of operations in future periods

periods.  During the years ended December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, there were no stock options granted or outstanding.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the Accounting Standards Codification™ (the Codification).  The Codification now is the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), in the United States.  The Codification became effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.  All other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be nonauthoritative, except for additional authoritative rules and interpretive releases issued by the United States Securities Exchange Commission (SEC).  The Codification is not intended to change GAAP; instead, it reorganizes the thousands of US GAAP pronouncements into approximately 90 Accounting Topics.  Adoption of the Codification did not have an impact on our financial statements.

In May 2009,  new guidance was issued for accounting for subsequent events.  The new guidance, which is now part of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 855, Subsequent Events, is consistent with existing auditing standards in its definition of subsequent events, but requires disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date.  There are two types of subsequent events: (1) events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, and are recognized in the financial statements, and (2) events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the balance sheet date, but arose before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued, and are not recognized at the balance sheet date.  The adoption of the new guidance had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.  We evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after December 31, 1009 up through March 31, 2010, the date these financial statements were issued and filed with the SEC.  

  In December 2007,  new guidance was issued for accounting for collaborative arrangements.  The new guidance, which is now part of ASC Topic 808, Collaborative Arrangements, is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.  The scope of the new guidance is limited to collaborative arrangements where no separate legal entity exists and in which the parties are active participants and are exposed to significant risks and rewards that depend on the success of the activity.  The new guidance requires certain income statement presentation of transactions with third parties and of payments between parties to the arrangement, along with disclosure about the nature and purpose of the arrangement.  The adoption of the new guidance on January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

F-7

INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009
(AUDITED)

1.   SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CON’T)

In December 2007, new guidance was issued for accounting for business combinations.  The new guidance, which is now part of ASC topic 805, Business Combinations, is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008.  The new guidance establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and the goodwill acquired in the business combination.  ASC Topic 805 also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. We adopted the new guidance on January 1, 2009, which had no immediate impact on our financial statements; however, it may have an impact on the accounting for any potential future business combinations.

Inventories

Inventories, consisting of computer and networking equipment, are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market (replacement cost).

F-7

INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.

2.  PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENTNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

A summaryDECEMBER 31, 2010
(AUDITED)

2.RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In January 2010, the Financial FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which amends the disclosure requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The guidance requires disclosure of propertytransfers of assets and equipmentliabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value measurement hierarchy, including the reasons and the estimated lives usedtiming of the transfers and information on purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements on a gross basis in the computationreconciliation of depreciationthe assets and amortizationliabilities measured under Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy. The guidance is as follows:effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for Level 3 reconciliation disclosures which are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted these amendments in the first quarter of 2010 and the adoption did not have a material impact on the disclosures of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09 “Subsequent Events - Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” (“ASU 2010-09”), which amends FASB ASC Topic 855, Subsequent Events, so that SEC filers no longer are required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. ASU No. 2010-09 was effective immediately and the Company adopted these new requirements in the first quarter of 2010. The adoption did not have a material impact on the disclosures of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

  DECEMBER 31,  DECEMBER 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Computer equipment $—  $2,284 
Less accumulated depreciation  —   2,270 
  $—  $14 

3.  
3.INCOME TAXES

The Company recognizes deferred income tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns.  Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.

The Company recorded no income taxes for the years ended December 31, 20092010 due to the use of available net operating loss carryforwards.carry forwards. For the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, the Company incurred a net loss and no tax provision was required. 

Net operating loss carryforwardscarry forwards of approximately $680,000 at December 31, 20092010 are available to offset future taxable income, if any, and expire in 2027.  This results in a net deferred tax asset, assuming an effective tax rate of 34% of approximately $231,000 at December 31, 2009.2010.  A valuation allowance in the same amount has been provided to reduce the deferred tax asset, as realization of the asset is not assured.

 
F-8
 


INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 20092010
(AUDITED)

4.  
4.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

Preferred stock

At December 31, 2009,2010, the Company had 2,500,000no shares of its preferred stock issued and outstanding. ThePreviously issued preferred shares were issued in exchange for the 20,000converted according to their terms into 5,000,000 shares of common stock held by the Company’s founders.  At the time of the exchange, such 20,000 shares comprised all of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company, and as a result, the exchange was treated as an “equal value” exchange with the 2,500,000 preferred shares having the same value as the 20,000 shares of common stock for which they were exchanged.  The only journal entries made at the time of the exchange were to take into account the par value of each of the shares exchanged.

The following is a list of significant designations, rights and preference of the presently issued preferred shares:

      Each holder shall have two votes for each share of preferred stock.

      Liquidation preference—In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company, holders of Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled, before any distribution or payment out of the assets of the Company may be made to or set aside for the holders of any common stock, to receive in full an amount equal to $2.00 per share, together with an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid dividends accrued to the date of payment.

     Additionally, from time to time the Board of Directors may designate additional classes of preferred stock with designations, rights and preferences to be determined by the Company’s board of directors. The issuance of the preferred stock and additional shares of the preferred stock in the future could adversely affect the rights of the holders of the common stock.

With respect to such preferred shares, the Board of Directors may determine, without further vote or action by their stockholders:

     the number of shares and the designation of the series;

   whether to pay dividends on the series and, if so, the dividend rate, whether dividends will be cumulative and, if so, from which date or dates, and the relative rights of priority of payment of dividends on shares of the series;

    whether the series will have voting rights in addition to the voting rights provided by law and, if so, the terms of the voting rights;

     whether the series will be convertible into or exchangeable for shares of any other class or series of stock and, if so, the terms and conditions of conversion or exchange;

      whether or not the shares of the series will be redeemable and, if so, the dates, terms and conditions of redemption and whether there will be a sinking fund for the redemption of that series and, if so, the terms and amount of the sinking fund; and

      the rights of the shares of the series in the event of our voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up and the relative rights or priority, if any, of payment of shares of the series.

F-9

INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2009
(AUDITED)

4.  STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY) (CON’T)September 16, 2010.

Common stock

At December 31, 2009,2010, the Company had 889,5335,889,533 shares of its common stock issued and outstanding. These shares comprised 273,333 shares issued on March 22, 2006 in exchange for certain Notes Payable (see Note 2, above), 500,000 shares issued on April 1, 2006 in consideration for certain financial advisory services and 116,200 shares issued on March 31, 2006 in connection with a private placement of common shares.  Dividends may be paid on outstanding shares of common stock as declared by the Board of Directors. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote.

5.  
5.ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following:

 DECEMBER 31  DECEMBER 31  DECEMBER 31 
 2009  2008  2010  2009 
Trade payables:            
American Express  5,323    
Other payables- less than 5% $865  $2,377   1,116   865 
Sales tax payable  3,179   —       3,179 
Legal and accounting fees  3,295   5,415       3,295 
 $7,339  $7,792  $6,440  $7,339 

6.  
6.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company sells to Anchorfree Wireless, Inc., a company and AFNCA, Inc. which are controlled by the principal shareholders of the Company.  During the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 approximately 94% and 2008 approximately 80% and 1%, respectively, of the Company’s sales were made to Anchorfree.Anchorfree and AFNCA.  As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, both Anchorfree and 2008, Anchorfree wasAFNCA were not indebted to the Company for sales made in the ordinary course of business.

F-9

INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.

7.  NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010
(AUDITED)

7.GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principle, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern.  However, The Company has a negative net working capital of $10,240$12,255 as of December 31, 20092010 and net incomeincome/(loss) of $246($2,015) and $15,113$246 for years ended December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, respectively. The Company currently has limited liquidity, and has not completed its efforts to establish a stabilized source of revenues sufficient to cover operating costs over an extended period of time.

Management anticipates that the Company will be dependent, for the near future, on additional investment capital to fund operating expenses. There are no assurances that the Company will be successful in this or any of its endeavors or become financially viable and continue as a going concern.

 
F-10
 

ITEM 9.        CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

ITEM 9A(T).         CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
 
None.
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

. The Company’s ChiefCompany's Management under the supervision and with the participation of the Principal Executive Officer and Chiefthe Principal Financial Officer performed anare responsible for establishing and maintaining "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in the Exchange Act) for the Company. Based on their evaluation of the Company’sCompany's disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosureprocedures as of December 31, 2010, the Company's Management has concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designedwere not effective due to the lack of segregation of duties to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by an issuerthe Company under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 isand accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management,Company's Management, including its Chiefthe Principal Executive Officer and Chiefthe Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31, 2009.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT

Management prepared, and is responsible for, the financial statements and the other information appearing in this annual report. The financial statements present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In preparing its financial statements, the Company includes amounts that are based on estimates and judgments that Management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The Company’s financial statements have been audited by Paritz & Co., an independent registered public accounting firm appointed by the Company’s Board of Directors. Management has made available to Paritz & Co. all of the Company’s financial records and related data, as well as the minutes of the stockholders’ and Directors’ meetings.

MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s Management and Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. This assessment was based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment, we believe that as of December 31, 2009 the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
 
/S/    Eugene Malobrodsky
Eugene Malobrodsky
Chief Executive Officer

/S/    David Gorodyansky
David Gorodyansky
Chief Financial Officer

19

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

ThereReporting. During the last quarter of the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, there were no changes in the Company’sCompany's internal controlscontrol over financial reporting during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company have been detected. The Company's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective at the "reasonable assurance" level.
ITEM 9B.  
OTHER INFORMATION

None

PART III

ITEM 10.                
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Employees
 
The following table sets forth information with respect to our directors and executive officers.  Other than these persons, there are no significant employees.

Name Age Position
Eugene Malobrodsky 2829 Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Director
     
David Gorodyansky 2829 
President, Chief Operating Officer
and Chief Financial Officer and Director


23

David Gorodyansky.   Founded Intelligent Buying Inc. in 2004.  From August 2001 through May 2002, he served as a Sr. Strategy Manager with Fulcrum Management.  In May 2002, he commenced the business which was the predecessor of Intelligent Buying, Inc. as a partnership with Eugene Malobrodsky.  This business became Intelligent Buying, Inc. in March 2004 and he has continued as Director and President of Intelligent Buying through the present date.  David is a member of the Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals and an advisor on the Technology Expert Council to Gavin Newsom, the mayor of San Francisco.  He was also is the Co-Founder and currently serves as President of AnchorFree Wireless Inc., which operates Wi-Fi networks in San Francisco and Palo Alto, California.

Eugene Malobrodsky, Founded Intelligent Buying Inc. in 2004 and was active in initially funding and growth of the company.  From September 2000 through August 2001, he served as Information Technology Director of Web Ever, Inc.  From September 2001 through June 2002, he served as Sales Manager for Unix Surplus.  In May 2002, he commenced the business which was the predecessor of Intelligent Buying, Inc. as a partnership with David Gorodyansky.  This business became Intelligent Buying, Inc. in March 2004 and he has continued as Director, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Intelligent Buying through the present date.  He is currently in charge of technical operations and strategy planning.  He also currently serves as a Senior Vive President of AnchorFree Wireless, Inc., which operates Wi-Fi networks in San Francisco and Palo Alto, California.

Messrs. Gorodyansky and Malobrodsky currently each devote approximately five to ten hours per week to the business of Intelligent Buying, Inc.

Family Relationships
 
There are no family relationships among our directors or officers.

20

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert
 
We do not currently have an audit committee financial expert, nor do we have an audit committee.  Our entire board of directors, which currently consists of Messrs Malobrodsky and Gordyansky, handle the functions that would otherwise be handled by an audit committee.  We do not currently have the capital resources to pay director fees to a qualified independent expert who would be willing to serve on our board and who would be willing to act as an audit committee financial expert.  As our business expands and as we appoint others to our board of directors we expect that we will seek a qualified independent expert to become a member of our board of directors.  Before retaining any such expert our board would make a determination as to whether such person is independent.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.

Section 16(a) of the Securities Act of 1934 requires the Company's officers and directors, and greater than 10% stockholders, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of its securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of the reports are required by SEC regulation to be furnished to the Company. Based on management's review of these reports during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, all reports required to be filed were filed on a timely basis.
 
Code of Ethics
 
Our board of directors has adopted a code of ethics that our officers, directors and any person who may perform similar functions is subject to.  Currently, Messrs Malobrodsky and Gordyansky are our only officers and directors, therefore, they are the only persons subject to the Code of Ethics.  If we retain additional officers in the future to act as our principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller or persons serving similar functions, they would become subject to the Code of Ethics.  The Code of Ethics does not indicate the consequences of a breach of the code.  If there is a breach, the board of directors would review the facts and circumstances surrounding the breach and take action that it deems appropriate, which action may include dismissal of the employee who breached the code.  Currently, since Messrs Malobrodsky and Gordyansky serve as the only directors and officers, they are responsible for reviewing their own conduct under the Code of Ethics and determining what action to take in the event of his own breach of the Code of Ethics.
 
24
ITEM 11.  
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
 
The following table sets forth information concerning all cash and non-cash compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our officers for services during the last three fiscal years in all capacities to us, our subsidiaries and predecessors. No executive officer received compensation of $100,000 or more in any of the last three fiscal years.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and
Principal 
Position
 Year 
Salary
($)
  
Bonus
($)
  
Stock
Awards
($)
  
Option
Awards
($)
  
Non-
Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
Earnings ($)
  
Non-
qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
  
All Other
Compensation
($)
  
Total
($)
 
Eugene                          
Malobrodsky 2008  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
CEO, 2009  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Secretary 2010  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
And Director                                   
                                   
David                                  
Gorodyansky                                  
President, 2008  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
COO, CFO 2009  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
and 2010  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Director                                  
Name and
Principal
Position
 
Year
 
Salary
($)
  
Bonus
($)
  
Stock
Awards
($)
  
Option
Awards
($)
  
Non-
Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
Earnings ($)
  
Non-
qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
  
All Other
Compensation
($)
  
Total
($)
 
Eugene Malobrodsky 2007  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
CEO, Secretary 2008  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
And Director  2009  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
David Gorodyansky President, 2007  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
COO, CFO and 2008  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Director 2009  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 


21

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
 
None of our executive officers received any equity awards, including, options, restricted stock or other equity incentives, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.2010.
 
Additional Narrative Disclosures
 
All of our employees, including our executive officers, are employed at will and none of our employees has entered into an employment agreement with us. We do not have any bonus, deferred compensation or retirement plan.

Director Compensation
 
We have no standard arrangements in place to compensate our directors for their service as directors or as members of any committee of directors. In the future, if we retain non-employee directors, we may decide to compensate them for their service to us as directors and members of committees.


ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
 
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 1, 201022, 2011 (i) by each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of our common stock; (ii) by each of our officers and directors; and (iii) by all of our officers and directors as a group:


25
Title of Class 
Name & Address of
Beneficial Owner
 Office, If Any 
Amount & Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership1
  
Percent
of
Class2
 
Common Stock
$0.001 par value
 
Altitude Group, LLC (1)
2264 82nd Street
Brooklyn, NY 11214
 5% holder  500,000   56.21%
Common Stock
$0.001 par value
 
Sophia Malobrodsky
260 Santa Ana Court
Sunnyvale, CA 94085.
 5% holder  253,333   28.48%
Common Stock
$0.001 par value
 
Eugene Malobrodsky (2)
260 Santa Ana Court
Sunnyvale, CA 94085.
 
CEO, Secretary
And Director 
  -0-   0.00%
Common Stock
$0.001 par value
 
David Gorodyansky (2)
260 Santa Ana Court
Sunnyvale, CA 94085.
 
President, COO, CFO and Director
 
  -0-3  0.00%
Common Stock
$0.001 par value
 All officers and directors as a group (2 persons named above)    -0-   0.00%
Title of Class 
 
Name & Address of
Beneficial Owner
 Office, If Any 
Amount & Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership1
  
 
Percent
of
Class(2)
 
Common Stock Altitude Group, LLC (1) 5% holder  500,000   8.49%
$0.001 par value 2264 82nd Street          
  Brooklyn, NY 11214          
             
Common Stock Eugene Malobrodsky CEO,  2,500,000   42.45%
$0.001 par value 450 National Ave Secretary        
  Mountain View, CA 94043 And Director         
             
Common Stock David Gorodyansky President,  2,500,000   42.45%
$0.001 par value 450 National Ave COO, CFO        
  Mountain View, CA 94043 and Director        
             
Common Stock All officers and directors as a    5,000,000   84.90%
$0.001 par value group (2 persons named above)          

 (1)Altitude Group, LLC is controlled by Michael Kreizman, M.D.
 (2)Messrs. Malobrodsky and Gorodyansky each hold 1,250,000Based on 5,889,533 shares of the Company’s preferred stock which is convertible into an aggregateour Common Stock outstanding as of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.March 22, 2011. 

22

Beneficial Ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Each of the beneficial owners listed above has direct ownership of and sole voting power and investment power with respect to the shares of our common stock.  For each Beneficial Owner above, any options exercisable within 60 days have been included in the denominator.
 
Based on 889,533 shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2010. 
Changes in Control
 
We do not currently have any arrangements which if consummated may result in a change of control of our Company.  

ITEM 13.ITEM13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR  INDEPENDENCE
 
Certain Relationships and Transactions with Related Persons

Eugene Malobrodsky and David Gorodyansky, the sole officers and directors of the Company, are Senior Vice President and President, respectively, of AnchorFree Wireless, Inc., a related company.  For the years ended December 31, 20092010 and 2008, AnchorFree Wireless, Inc. accounted for approximately 80%94% and 1%80% of the Company’s sales, respectively.  Sophia Malobrodsky, a shareholder of the company holding approximately 28.48%4% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock is the mother of Eugene Malobrodsky, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.  Royce Diener, an owner of 4,000 shares of common stock of the Company is the father of the Company’s counsel, Robert L. B. Diener.

As of December 31, 2008,2010, the Company owes approximately $12,073$6,741 to AnchorFree Wireless, Inc., a company controlled by the principal shareholders and officers of the Company.  These amounts represent short-term advances in the ordinary course of business and fluctuate significantly.  This amount will be used to offset future purchases by AnchorFree Wireless, Inc.

CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

1. On March 22, 2004, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock to each of the Company’s founders, Eugene Malobrodsky and David Gorodyansky for a cash consideration of $200.  At the time, the founders became the sole shareholders of the Company.

2. During fiscal year 2004, Sophia Malobrodsky made a non-interest-bearing loan advance to the Company, payable on demand, in the amount of $38,000.  On January 2, 2006. the Company agreed to exchange the outstanding balance of $38,000 for 253,333 shares of the Company’s common stock ($0.15 per share).  While the Company was committed to issue these shares at January 2, 2006, these shares were not physically issued until March 22, 2006 because the Company needed to increase its authorized capital and engage a transfer agent in order to facilitate the physical issuance of the shares.


26
During fiscal year 2005, Ilya Perlov made a non-interest-bearing loan advance to the Company, payable on demand, in the amount of $3,000.  Mr. Perlov is an employee of the Company.  On January 2, 2006. the Company agreed to exchange the outstanding balance of $3,000 for 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock ($0.15 per share).  While the Company was committed to issue these shares at January 2, 2006, these shares were not physically issued until March 22, 2006 because the Company needed to increase its authorized capital and engage a transfer agent in order to facilitate the physical issuance of the shares.


23

On January 2, 2006, Ms. Malobrodsky and Mr. Perlov made demand for repayment of these obligations.  At the time, the Company did not have the funds available for such repayment and the obligations were deemed to be in default.  At that time, the Company had not completed its private placement and there was no guarantee that it would be completed on a timely basis, if at all.  As a result, Ms. Malobrodsky agreed to exchange the outstanding balance of the outstanding loan advance ($38,000) owed by the Company to her for 253,333 shares of common stock and Mr. Perlov agreed to exchange the outstanding balance of the outstanding loan advance ($3,000) owed by the Company to him for 20,000 shares of common stock, both at an exchange rate of one share for each $0.15 of debt.  The $0.15 per share conversion price was negotiated at that time on an arms-length basis between Ms. Malobrodsky, Mr. Perlov and the Company which took into account a number of factors, including but not limited to (a) the conversion of obligations which had priority over common equity to a common equity position which is pari-passu with all other equity holders; (b) the illiquidity of the Company at the time (as of December 31, 2005, the Company only had $2,197 cash); (c) the Company believed that the obligations to Ms. Malobrodsky and Mr. Perlov needed to be eliminated in order to complete any private placement of common equity and (d) the Company knew that the prospective investors in the private placement would not permit any of the proceeds of such offering to be utilized for payments to the noteholders.  While the Company was committed to issue these shares at January 2, 2006, these shares were not physically issued until March 22, 2006 because the Company needed to increase its authorized capital and engage a transfer agent in order to facilitate the physical issuance of the shares.  The shares issued to Ms. Malobrodsky and Mr. Perlov were valued at $.75 per share and the accounting treatment of the exchange was to debit Notes Payable and credit Common Stock par value and Additional Paid-In Capital.

3. On April 1, 2006, the company issued 500,000 shares of common stock to Altitude Group, LLC pursuant to the terms of a Financial Services Agreement entered into by the Company on said date. The term of the Agreement is for a period commencing March 22, 2006 and ending on March 21, 2008 and may only be extended upon the mutual written agreement of the Parties. In consideration for Altitude providing the services set forth in the Agreement, the Company was obligated to issue to Altitude 500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock of the Company.  The Company has valued the services provided and to be provided by Altitude as $375,000 which was recorded as an expense in the Company’s quarter ended June 30, 2006. This valuation was determined in accordance with FASB 123—Accounting for Stock-based Compensation.

4. On March 22, 2006, the Company exchanged 1,250,000 shares of its preferred stock for the 10,000 shares of common stock held by each of the Company’s founders, Eugene Malobrodsky and David Gorodyansky.  The 20,000 common shares exchanged by the founders were originally purchased for $200 cash. 

5. On September 16, 2010, all 2,500,00 shares of preferred stock were converted into 5,000,000 shares of common stock. Thereafter, no shares of preferred stock remained issued and outstanding

Director Independence
 
The Board of Directors is currently composed of 2 members, Mr. Malobrodsky and Mr. Gorodyansky. None of our directors are “independent” directors, as that term is defined under the Nasdaq listing standards.

27
 
ITEM 14.  
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
 
AUDIT FEES

The aggregate fees billed by our auditors, Paritz & Co., for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 20092010 and review our interim financial statements for the first, second and third quarters of 20092011 will be approximately $4,500. The aggregate fees billed by our auditors for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 20082009 were $7,380.approximately $4,500.

AUDIT-RELATED FEES
 
During the last two fiscal years, no fees were billed or incurred for assurance or related services by our auditors that were reasonably related to the audit or review of financial statements reported above.

TAX FEES
 
There were no tax preparation fees billed for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20092010 or 2008.2009.

 
24

ALL OTHER FEES

During the last two fiscal years, no other fees were billed or incurred for services by our auditors other than the fees noted above. Our board, acting as an audit committee, deemed the fees charged to be compatible with maintenance of the independence of our auditors.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES

We do not have a separate audit committee. Our full board of directors performs the functions of an audit committee. Before an independent auditor is engaged by us to render audit or non-audit services, our board of directors pre-approves the engagement. Board of directors pre-approval of audit and non-audit services will not be required if the engagement for the services is entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by our board of directors regarding our engagement of the independent auditor, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, our board of directors is informed of each service provided, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of our board of directors' responsibilities under the Exchange Act to our management. Our board of directors may delegate to one or more designated members of our board of directors the authority to grant pre-approvals, provided such approvals are presented to the board of directors at a subsequent meeting. If our board of directors elects to establish pre-approval policies and procedures regarding non-audit services, the board of directors must be informed of each non-audit service provided by the independent auditor. Board of directors pre-approval of non-audit services, other than review and attest services, also will not be required if such services fall within available exceptions established by the SEC. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,2010, 100% of audit-related services, tax services and other services performed by our independent auditors were pre-approved by our board of directors.
 
Our board has considered whether the services described above under the caption "All Other Fees", which are currently none, is compatible with maintaining the auditor's independence.

The board approved all fees described above.

28

PART IV

Item 15. 
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

The following documents are filed as part of this 10-K:

1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following documents are filed in Part II, Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K:

·      Report of Paritz & Co., Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm
·Report of Paritz & Co., Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm

·      Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008
·Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009

·      Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

·      Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the period from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2010

·      Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
·Notes to Financial Statements

·      Notes to Financial Statements

25

2.  FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

All financial statement schedules have been omitted as they are not required, not applicable, or the required information is otherwise included.

3.  EXHIBITS

The exhibits listed below are filed as part of or incorporated by reference in this report.

Exhibit No.                               Identification of Exhibit

Exhibit No.Identification of Exhibit
31.1.Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2.Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
23.1.                        Consent of Paritz & Co. regarding audited financial statements for the period ending December 31, 2009

31.1.                        Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2.                        Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1                        Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2                        Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 
2629
 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  Intelligent Buying, Inc.
  (Registrant)
   
 By
/s/ Eugene Malobrodsky
   
  Eugene Malobrodsky
  Chief Executive Officer
   
 Date
March 30, 201023, 2011
   
 By
/s/ Eugene Malobrodsky
   
  David Gorodyansky
  
Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer
   
 Date
March 30, 201023, 2011

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the date indicated.

 By
 /s/ Eugene Malobrodsky
   
  Eugene Malobrodsky
  Chief Executive Officer and Director
   
 Date
 March 30, 201023, 2011
   
 By
 /s/ David Gorodyansky
   
  David Gorodyansky
  
Chief Financial Officer, Principal
Accounting Officer and Director
   
 Date
 March 30, 201023, 2011

 
2730