UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

Sx ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year endedMarch 31, 20122013 or

 

£¨   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _______ to _______

 

Commission file number        0-26200

 

BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND IV L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware04-3208648
(State or other jurisdiction(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)Identification No.)

 

One Boston Place, Suite 2100, Boston, Massachusetts  02108
(Address of principal executive offices)           (Zip(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code(617)624-8900

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code(617)624-8900

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class - Name of each exchange on which registered

None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Title of class

Beneficial Assignee Certificates

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes£¨NoSx

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes£¨NoSx

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YesSxNo£¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YesSxNo£¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

 

Large accelerated filer£¨

 

Accelerated filer£¨

Non-accelerated filer£¨Smaller reporting companySx

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes£¨NoSx

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

None.

 

 
 

 

BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND IV L.P.

FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 20122013

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I 
  
Item 1.Business1
Item 1A.Risk Factors3
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments5
Item 2.Properties5
Item 3.Legal Proceedings4742
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures4742
   
PART II
  
Item 5.Market for the Fund's Limited Partnership Interests and Related PartnershipPartner Matters and Issuer Purchases of Partnership Interests4843
Item 6.Selected Financial Data4944
Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations5045
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk139150
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data139150
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure139150
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures139150
Item 9B.Other Information140151
   
PART III
   
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance of the Fund141152
Item 11.Executive Compensation143154
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Partner Matters143154
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence144155
Item 14.Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services145156
   
PART IV
   
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules149160
Signatures174

 

 
 

 

PART I

 

Item 1.Business

Item 1.           Business

 

Organization

 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. (the "Fund") is a limited partnership formed under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act as of October 5, 1993. Effective as of June 1, 2001 there was a restructuring, and as a result, the Fund's general partner was reorganized as follows. The general partner of the Fund continues to be Boston Capital Associates IV L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. The general partner of the Fund’s general partner is now BCA Associates Limited Partnership, a Massachusetts limited partnership, whose sole general partner is C&M Management, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation. John P. Manning is the principal executive officer of C&M Management, Inc. The limited partner of the Fund’s general partner is Capital Investment Holdings, a general partnership whose partners are various officers and employees of Boston Capital Partners, Inc., and its affiliates. The assignor limited partner is BCTC IV Assignor Corp., a Delaware corporation which is now wholly-owned by John P. Manning.

 

The assignor limited partner was formed for the purpose of serving in that capacity for the Fund and will not engage in any other business. Units of beneficial interest in the limited partnership interest of the assignor limited partner are assigned by the assignor limited partner by means of beneficial assignee certificates ("BACs") to investors and investors are entitled to all the rights and economic benefits of a limited partner of the Fund including rights to a percentage of the income, gains, losses, deductions, credits and distributions of the Fund.

 

A Registration Statement on Form S-11 and the related prospectus, (together with each subsequently filed prospectus, the "Prospectus") were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and became effective December 16, 1993, in connection with a public offering (together with each subsequent offering of BACs described herein, the "Offering") in one or more series of a minimum of 250,000 BACs and a maximum of 30,000,000 BACs at $10 per BAC. On April 18, 1996, a Form S-11, which registered an additional 10,000,000 BACs for sale to the public in one or more series, became effective. On April 2, 1998, a Form S-11, which registered an additional 25,000,000 BACs for sale to the public in one or more series, became effective. On August 31, 1999, a Form S-11, which registered an additional 8,000,000 BACs for sale to the public, became effective. On July 26, 2000, a Form S-11, which registered an additional 7,500,000 BACs for sale to the public, became effective. On July 23, 2001, a Form S-11, which registered an additional 7,000,000 BACs for sale to the public, became effective. On July 24, 2002, a Form S–11, which registered an additional 7,000,000 BAC’s for sale to the public, became effective. On July 1, 2003, a Form S–11, which registered an additional 7,000,000 BAC’s for sale to the public, became effective. As of March 31, 2012,2013, subscriptions had been received and accepted by the General Partner in Series 20, Series 21, Series 22, Series 23, Series 24, Series 25, Series 26, Series 27, Series 28, Series 29, Series 30, Series 31, Series 32, Series 33, Series 34, Series 35, Series 36, Series 37, Series 38, Series 39, Series 40, Series 41, Series 42, Series 43 Series 44, Series 45 and Series 46 for 83,651,080 BACs in twenty-seven series representing capital contributions of $836,177,880 in the aggregate.

Description of Business

 

The Fund's principal business is to invest as a limited partner in other limited partnerships (the "Operating Partnerships") each of which will own or lease and will operate an apartment complex exclusively or partially for low- and moderate-income tenants. Each Operating Partnership in which the Fund invests owns apartment complexes, which are completed, newly-constructed, under construction or rehabilitation, or to-be constructed or rehabilitated, and which are expected to receive government assistance. Each apartment complex is expected to qualify for the low-income housing tax credit under Section 42 of the Code (the "Federal Housing Tax Credit"), providing tax benefits over a period of ten to twelve years in the form of tax credits which investors may use to offset income, subject to certain strict limitations, from other sources. Some apartment complexes may also qualify for the historic rehabilitation tax credit under Section 47 of the Code (the "Rehabilitation Tax Credit"). Section 236 (f) (ii) of the National Housing Act, as amended, and Section 101 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1965, as amended, each provide for the making by HUD of rent supplement payments to low income tenants in properties which receive other forms of federal assistance such as tax credits. The payments for each tenant, which are made directly to the owner of their property, generally are in such amounts as to enable the tenant to pay rent equal to 30% of the adjusted family income. Some of the apartment complexes in which the Fund has invested are receiving their rent supplements from HUD. HUD has been in the process of converting rent supplement assistance to assistance paid not to the owner of the apartment complex, but directly to the individuals. At this time, the Fund is unable to predict whether Congress will continue rent supplement programs payable directly to owners of apartment complexes.

 

As of March 31, 20122013 the Fund had invested in 1211 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 20, 65 Operating Partnership on behalf of Series 21, 2010 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 22, 1511 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 23, 1813 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 24, 117 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 25, 3931 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 26, 1513 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 27, 2420 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 28, 21 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 29, 1716 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 30, 2625 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 31, 15 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 32, 8 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 33, 1413 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 34, 1110 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 35, 119 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 36, 7 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 37, 10 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 38, 9 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 39, 16 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 40, 20 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 41, 2221 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 42, 23 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 43, 10 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 44, 30 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 45 and 15 Operating partnershipsPartnerships on behalf of Series 46. A description of these Operating Partnerships is set forth in Item 2 herein.

The business objectives of the Fund are to:

(1)Provide current tax benefits to investors in the form of Federal Housing Tax Credits and, in limited instances, a small amount of Rehabilitation Tax Credits, which an investor may apply, subject to strict limitations, against the investor's federal income tax liability from active, portfolio and passive income;
(2)Preserve and protect the Fund's capital and provide capital appreciation and cash distributions through increases in value of the Fund's investments and, to the extent applicable, equity buildup through periodic payments on the mortgage indebtedness with respect to the apartment complexes;
(3)Provide tax benefits in the form of passive losses which an investor may apply to offset his passive income (if any); and
(4)Provide cash distributions (except with respect to the Fund's investment in some non-profit Operating Partnerships) from capital transaction proceeds. The Operating Partnerships intend to hold the apartment complexes for appreciation in value. The Operating Partnerships may sell the apartment complexes after a period of time if financial conditions in the future make such sales desirable and if such sales are permitted by government restrictions.

 

Employees

 

The Fund does not have any employees. Services are performed by the general partner and its affiliates and agents retained by them.

 

Item 1A.Risk Factors

Item 1A.           Risk Factors

 

As used in this Item 1A, references to “we, “us” and “our” mean the Fund.

 

An investment in our BACs and our investments in Operating Partnerships are subject to risks. These risks may impact the tax benefits of an investment in our BACs, and the amount of proceeds available for distribution to our limited partners, if any, on liquidation of our investments.

 

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the following factors which could materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. The risks described below are not the only risks we face. Additional factors not presently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business operations.

 

The ability of limited partners to claim tax losses from their investment in us is limited.

 

The IRS may audit us or an Operating Partnership and challenge the tax treatment of tax items. The amount of Low Income Housing Tax Credits and tax losses allocable to the investors could be reduced if the IRS were successful in such a challenge. The alternative minimum tax could reduce tax benefits from an investment in our BACs. Changes in tax laws could also impact the tax benefits from an investment in our BACs and/or the value of the Operating Partnerships. Until the Operating Partnerships have completed a mandatory fifteen year Low Income Housing Tax Credit compliance period, investors are at risk for potential recapture of Low Income Housing Tax Credits that have already been claimed.

The Low Income Housing Tax Credits rules are extremely complicated and noncompliance with these rules may have adverse consequences for BAC holders.

 

Noncompliance with applicable tax regulations may result in the loss of future Low Income Housing Tax Credits and the fractional recapture of Low Income Housing Tax Credits already taken. In most cases the annual amount of Low Income Housing Tax Credits that an individual can use is limited to the tax liability due on the person’s last $25,000 of taxable income. The Operating Partnerships may be sold at a price which would not result in our realizing cash distributions or proceeds from the transaction. Accordingly, we may be unable to distribute any cash to our investors. Low Income Housing Tax Credits may be the only benefit from an investment in our BACs.

 

Poor performance of one housing complex, or the real estate market generally, could impair our ability to satisfy our investment objectives.

 

Each housing complex is subject to mortgage indebtedness. If an Operating Partnership failed to pay its mortgage, it could lose its housing complex in foreclosure. If foreclosure were to occur during the first 15 years of the existence of the Fund, the loss of any remaining future Low Income Housing Tax Credits, a fractional recapture of previously claimed Low Income Housing Tax Credits, and a loss of our investment in the housing complex would occur. To the extent the Operating Partnerships receive government financing or operating subsidies, they may be subject to one or more of the following risks:

 

- difficulties in obtaining rent increases;

- limitations on cash distributions;

- limitations on sales or refinancing of Operating Partnerships;

- limitations on transfers of interests in Operating Partnerships;

- limitations on removal of local general partners;

- limitations on subsidy programs; and

- possible changes in applicable regulations.

 

The value of real estate is subject to risks from fluctuating economic conditions, including employment rates, inflation, tax, environmental, land use and zoning policies, supply and demand of similar properties, and neighborhood conditions, among others.

 

No trading market for the BACs exists or is expected to develop.

 

There is currently no active trading market for the BACs. Accordingly, limited partners may be unable to sell their BACs or may have to sell BACs at a discount. Limited partners should consider their BACs to be a long-term investment.

 

Investors may realize taxable gain on sale or disposition of BACs.

 

Upon the sale or other taxable disposition of BACs, investors will realize taxable income to the extent that their allocable share of the non-recourse mortgage indebtedness on the apartment complexes, together with the money they receive from the sale of the BACs, is greater than the original cost of their BACs. This realized taxable income is reduced to the extent that investors have suspended passive losses or credits. It is possible that the sale of BACs may not generate enough cash to pay the tax obligations arising from the sale.

 

Investors may have tax liability in excess of cash.

 

Investors eventually may be allocated profits for tax purposes which exceed any cash distributed to them. For this tax liability, the investor will have to pay federal income tax without a corresponding cash distribution.

Similarly, in the event of a sale or foreclosure of an apartment complex or a sale of BACs, an investor may be allocated taxable income, resulting in tax liability, in excess of any cash distributed to him or her as a result of such event.

 

Investors may not receive cash if apartment complexes are sold.

 

There is no assurance that investors will receive any cash distributions from the sale or refinancing of an apartment complex. The price at which an apartment complex is sold may not be large enough to pay the mortgage and other expenses which must be paid at such time. Even if there are net cash proceeds from a sale, expenses such as accrued Fund management fees and unpaid loans will be deducted pursuant to Section 4.02(a) of the Fund Agreement. If any of these events happen, investors will not get all of their investment back, and the only benefit from an investment will be the tax credits received.

 

The sale or refinancing of the apartment complexes is dependent upon the following material factors:

 

-The necessity of obtaining the consent of the operating general partners;
-The necessity of obtaining the approval of any governmental agency(ies) providing government assistance to the apartment complex; and
-The uncertainty of the market.

 

Any sale may occur well after the fifteen-year federal housing tax credit compliance period.

 

We have insufficient sources of cash to pay our existing liabilities.

 

We currently do not have sufficient cash resources to satisfy our financial liabilities. Furthermore, we do not anticipate that we will have sufficient available cash to pay our future financial liabilities. Substantially all of our existing liabilities are payable to our general partner and its affiliates. Though the amounts payable to the general partner and its affiliates are contractually currently payable, we do not believe that the general partner or its affiliates will demand immediate payment of these contractual obligations in the near term; however, there can be no assurance that this will be the case. We would be materially adversely affected if the general partner or its affiliates demanded payment in the near term of our existing contractual liabilities or suspended the provision of services to us because of our inability to satisfy these obligations. All monies currently deposited, or that will be deposited in the future, into the Fund's working capital reserves are intended to be utilized to pay our existing and future liabilities.

 

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

Item 1B.           Unresolved Staff Comments

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 2.Properties

Item 2.           Properties

 

The Fund has acquired a limited partnership interest in 445399 Operating Partnerships in 27 series, identified in the table set forth below. The apartment complexes owned by the Operating Partnerships are eligible for the Federal Housing Tax Credit. Initial occupancy of a unit in each apartment complex which initially complied with the minimum set-aside test (i.e., initial occupancy by tenants with incomes equal to no more than a designated percentage of area median income) and the rent restriction test (i.e., gross rent charged tenants does not exceed 30% of the applicable income standards) is referred to as "Qualified Occupancy." The Operating Partnerships and the respective apartment complexes are described more fully in the Prospectus. The general partner believes that there is adequate casualty insurance on the properties.

 

Please refer to Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for a more detailed discussion of operational difficulties experienced by certain of the Operating Partnerships.

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 20

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013 

 

Property
Name
 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  

 

Acq

Date

  

 

Const

Comp

  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

 
                    
Ashbury Apartments Sioux Falls, SD 48 $1,031,343   4/94   6/94   100% $806,117 
                         
Bradley Manor Bradley, AR 25  754,526   8/94   3/95   100%  182,044 
                         
Concordia Manor I St. Croix, VI 22  1,388,267   8/94   7/95   100%  490,034 
                         
Coushatta Seniors II Apartments  Coushatta, LA 24  670,392   5/94   3/94   100%  175,182 
                         
Edison Lane Apartments Edison, GA 24  683,749   9/94   10/95   100%  204,561 
                         
Fairoaks Lane Apts. Rincon, GA 44  1,346,076   7/94   5/95   100%  339,284 
                         
Forest Glen Village Vidalia, GA 46  1,260,827   7/94   2/95   100%  378,777 
                         
Harrisonburg, Seniors Apts. Harrison-burg, LA 24  639,743   5/94   1/94   100%  176,621 
                         
Kristine Apartments Bakersfield, CA 60  890,616   10/94   10/94   100%  311,675 
                         
Northfield Apts. Jackson, MS 120  2,333,578   6/94   8/95   100%  3,273,126 
                         
Riverview Apartments Franklinton, LA 47  1,583,680   4/94   10/94   100%  370,000 
                         
Shady Lane Senior Apts. Winnfield, LA 32  876,396   5/94   10/93   100%  197,200 


Property
Name
 Location Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/12
  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/13
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/13
 
                   
Ashbury Apartments Sioux Falls, SD  48  $995,606   4/94  6/94  100% $806,117 
                       
Concordia Manor I St. Croix, VI  22   1,378,391   8/94  7/95  100%  490,034 
                       
Coushatta Seniors II Apartments Coushatta, LA  24   665,125    5/94   3/94  100%  175,182 
                       
Edison Lane Apartments Edison, GA  24   679,121   9/94  10/95  100%  204,561 
                       
Fairoaks Lane Apts. Rincon, GA  44   1,337,067   7/94  5/95  100%  339,284 
                       
Forest Glen Village Vidalia, GA  46   1,251,817   7/94  2/95  100%  378,777 
                       
Harrisonburg, Seniors Apts. Harrison-burg, LA  24   633,663    5/94   1/94  100%  176,621 
                       
Kristine Apartments Bakersfield, CA  60   836,412   10/94  10/94  100%  311,675 
                       
Northfield Apts. Jackson, MS  120   1,996,531   6/94  8/95  100%  3,273,126 
                       
Riverview Apartments Franklinton, LA  47   1,570,580   4/94  10/94  100%  370,000 
                       
Shady Lane Senior Apts. Winnfield, LA  32   867,962   5/94  10/93  100%  197,200 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 21

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Property
Name
 Location Units Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
 
                    
Black River Run Black River Falls, WI 48 $904,301   10/94   12/94   100% $350,531 
                         
Forest Glen at Sully Station  Centreville, VA 119  5,459,282   11/94   9/95   100%  2,649,450 
                         
Fort Halifax Winslow, ME 24  894,600    9/94    1/95   100%  389,085 
                         
Havelock Manor Apts. Havelock, NC 60  1,719,028    12/94    10/95   100%  347,557 
                         
Holly Village Buchanan, GA 24  674,575    8/94    6/95   100%  205,400 
                         
 Liveoak Village Union Springs, AL 24  715,525   10/94   7/95   100%  176,953 

 


Property
Name
 Location Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/12
  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/13
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/13
 
                   
Forest Glen at Sully Station Centreville, VA  119  $5,327,466  11/94 9/95  100% $2,649,450 
                       
Fort Halifax Winslow, ME  24   882,495  9/94 1/95  100%  389,085 
                       
Havelock Manor Apts. Havelock, NC  60   1,701,752  12/94 10/95  100%  347,557 
                       
Holly Village Buchanan, GA  24   669,335  8/94 6/95  100%  205,400 
                       
 Liveoak Village Union Springs, AL  24   709,440  10/94 7/95  100%  176,953 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 22

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 2012

 Property

Name

 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  

 Acq

Date

  

 

Const

Comp

  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

 
                    
Albemarle Village Hertford, NC 36 $1,327,763    1/95    9/94   100% $321,628 
                         
Black River Run Apts. Black River Falls, WI 48  904,301   3/95   12/94   100%  395,279 
                         
Cobblestone Apartments Fuquay, NC 33  1,337,601    1/95    5/94   100%  326,054 
                         
Concordia Manor II St. Croix, VI 20  1,421,151    1/95    11/95   100%  259,444 
                         
Concordia Manor III St. Croix, VI 20  1,398,581    2/95    12/95   100%  264,007 
                         
Drakes Branch Elderly Drakes Branch, VA 32  1,198,335   1/95   6/95   100%  232,722 
                         
Elks Towers Apartments Litchfield, IL 27  670,768    10/95    12/96   100%  756,656 
                         
Highland House Boston, MA 14  2,033,612    12/96    5/97   100%  586,492 
                         
Kimbark 1200 Apts. Longmont, CO 48  1,824,309    9/95    12/95   100%  321,843 
                         
Kingsway Apartments Swedsboro, NJ 36  1,384,026    7/95    11/01   100%  384,585 
                         
Lake City Apartments Lake City, PA 44  1,228,073    8/98    6/98   100%  240,900 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 222013

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 2012

Continued

Property

Name

 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  

 Acq

Date

  

 Const

Comp

  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

 
                    
Marksville Square Marksville, LA 32 $901,802    1/95    1/96   100% $268,848 
                         
Neshoba County Philadelphia, MS 25  809,939    7/95    8/95   100%  251,411 
                         
Philadelphia Square Philadelphia, MS 16  518,361    7/95    8/95   100%  149,950 
                         
Quankey Hills Halifax, NC 24  945,439    1/95    3/95   100%  200,496 
                         
Richmond Square Richmond, MO 32  633,077    12/94    2/95   100%  931,456 
                         
Salem Wood Apartments Salemburg, NC 24  837,658    1/95    12/94   100%  181,355 
                         
The Birches Old Orchard Beach, ME 88  2,780,823   1/95   3/96   100%  1,514,512 
                         
Troy Villa Apartments Troy, MO 64  1,415,986    12/94    6/95   100%  1,810,416 
                         
Twin City Villa Festus, MO 40  1,070,362    1/95    11/95   100%  679,176 

Property
Name
 Location Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/12
  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/13
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/13
 
                   
Concordia Manor II St. Croix, VI  20  $1,411,726 ��1/95 11/95  100% $259,444 
                       
Concordia Manor III St. Croix, VI  20   1,387,660  2/95 12/95  100%  264,007 
                       
Drakes Branch Elderly Drakes Branch, VA  32   1,189,581  1/95 6/95  100%  232,722 
                       
Elks Towers Apartments Litchfield, IL  27   643,138  10/95 12/96  100%  756,656 
                       
Highland House Boston, MA  14   2,092,888  12/96 5/97  100%  586,492 
                       
Kimbark 1200 Apts. Longmont, CO  48   1,801,510  9/95 12/95  100%  321,843 
                       
Kingsway Apartments Swedsboro, NJ  36   1,372,173  7/95 11/01  100%  384,585 
                       
Lake City Apartments Lake City, PA  44   1,220,680  8/98 6/98  100%  240,900 
                       
Marksville Square Marksville, LA  32   894,994  1/95 1/96  100%  268,848 
                       
The Birches Old Orchard Beach, ME  88   2,753,523  1/95 3/96  100%  1,514,512 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 23

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

 Property

Name

 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  

 Acq

Date

  

 Const

Comp

  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

 
                    
Concordia Manor II St. Croix, VI 20 $1,421,151    1/95    11/95   100% $259,445 
                         
Concordia Manor III St. Croix, VI 20  1,398,581    2/95    12/95   100%  264,007 
                         
Colonna House Hempstead, NY 37  570,975    5/95    5/95   100%  1,551,605 
                         
Great Pines Apts. Hurleyville, NY 26  1,074,821    7/95    12/95   100%  340,835 
                         
Ithaca Apts. I Ithaca, MI 28  519,485    11/95    7/95   100%  164,008 
                         
Kimbark 1200 Apts. Longmont, CO 48  1,824,309    9/95    12/95   100%  965,530 
                         
La Pensione K Apts. Sacramento, CA 129  2,176,493    9/95    12/96   100%  2,650,580 
                         
Mathis Apartments Mathis, TX 32  850,902    1/95    1/95   100%  228,172 
                         
Mid City Apartments Jersey City, NJ 58  2,219,350    9/95    6/94   100%  113,679 
                         
Orange Grove Seniors Orange Grove, TX 24  621,696    5/95    2/95   100%  163,637 
                         
Riverview Apartments St. Louis, MO 42  1,168,809    8/95    12/95   100%  1,160,308 
                         
St. Peters Villa St. Peters, MO 54  1,331,880    7/95    3/96   100%  1,495,685 
                         
The Birches Old Orchard Beach,ME 88  2,780,823    1/95    3/96   100%  1,399,532 
                         
Twin City Villa Festus, MO 40  1,070,362    2/95    11/95   100%  679,176 
                         
Village Woods Est. Kansas City, KS 45  29,963    5/95    12/95   100%  1,704,928 


Property
Name
 Location Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/12
  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/13
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/13
 
                   
Concordia Manor II St. Croix, VI  20  $1,411,726  1/95 11/95  100% $259,445 
                       
Concordia Manor III St. Croix, VI  20   1,387,660  2/95 12/95  100%  264,007 
                       
Colonna House Hempstead, NY  37   608,822  5/95 5/95  100%  1,551,605 
                       
Great Pines Apts. Hurleyville, NY  26   1,062,541  7/95 12/95  100%  340,835 
                       
Ithaca Apts. I Ithaca, MI  28   504,120  11/95 7/95  100%  164,008 
                       
Kimbark 1200 Apts. Longmont, CO  48   1,801,510  9/95 12/95  100%  965,530 
                       
La Pensione K Apts. Sacramento, CA  129   2,105,581  9/95 12/96  100%  2,650,580 
                       
Mid City Apartments Jersey City, NJ  58   2,219,350  9/95 6/94  100%  113,679 
                       
Riverview Apartments St. Louis, MO  42   1,163,514  8/95 12/95  100%  1,160,308 
                       
The Birches Old Orchard Beach,ME  88   2,753,523  1/95 3/96  100%  1,399,532 
                       
Village Woods Est. Kansas City, KS  45   1,521,540  5/95 12/95  100%  1,704,928 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 24

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 2012

Property

Name

 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  

 Acq

Date

  

 Const

Comp

  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

 
                    
Autumn Ridge Apartments Shenandoah, VA 34 $1,466,789   7/96   1/97   100% $319,466 
                         
Brooks Summit Blue Ridge, GA 36  1,067,436   12/95   11/96   100%  332,470 
                         
Century East Apts. IV Bismark, ND 24  522,981   8/95   8/95   100%  399,962 
                         
Century East Apts. V Bismark, ND 24  522,065   11/95   9/95   100%  399,962 
                         
Cooper's Crossing Irving, TX 93  2,902,266   6/96   12/95   100%  848,708 
                         
Edenfield Apartments Millen, GA 48  1,073,302   1/96   12/96   100%  314,827 
                         
Elm Street Apartments Yonkers, NY 35  962,573   1/96   1/96   100%  407,601 
                         
Heritage Glen Apts. Coolidge, AZ 28  1,067,709   4/96   4/96   100%  373,388 
                         
Hillridge Apts Los Lunas, NM 38  215,000   8/96   6/96   100%  1,466,007 
                         
Lake Apts I Fargo, ND 24  515,976   8/95   7/95   100%  399,962 
                         
Lakeway Apts Zwolle, LA 32  779,922   11/95   4/96   100%  210,714 
                         
New Hilltop Apartments Laurens, SC 72  1,484,032   11/95   11/95   100%  450,039 
                         
Northfield Housing, L.P. Jackson, MS 5  121,419   12/96   9/96   100%  217,266 
                         
Pahrump Valley Apts. Pahrump, NV 32  1,327,002   7/96   7/96   100%  335,225 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 242013

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 2012

Continued

 Property

Name

 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  

 Acq

Date

  

 

Const

Comp

  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

 
                    
Park Meadow Apartments Gaylord, MI 80 $1,442,735   9/95   4/97   100% $1,753,158 
                         
Shadowcreek Apartments Overton, NV 24  1,167,134   6/96   9/96   100%  361,320 
                         
Woodlands Apartments Elko, NV 24  1,163,631   11/95   9/95   100%  269,867 
                         
Wyandotte Apartments Los Angeles, CA 73  2,701,921   4/96   2/97   100%  1,663,747 


Property
Name
 Location Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/12
  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/13
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/13
 
                   
Autumn Ridge Apartments Shenandoah, VA  34  $1,457,510  7/96 1/97  100% $319,466 
                       
Brooks Summit Blue Ridge, GA  36   1,060,455  12/95 11/96  100%  332,470 
                       
Century East Apts. IV Bismark, ND  24   508,819  8/95 8/95  100%  399,962 
                       
Century East Apts. V Bismark, ND  24   508,546  11/95 9/95  100%  399,962 
                       
Elm Street Apartments Yonkers, NY  35   940,153  1/96 1/96  100%  407,601 
                       
Hillridge Apts Los Lunas, NM  38   215,000  8/96 6/96  100%  1,466,007 
                       
Lake Apts I Fargo, ND  24   527,315  8/95 7/95  100%  399,962 
                       
New Hilltop Apartments Laurens, SC  72   1,456,703  11/95 11/95  100%  450,039 
                       
Northfield Housing, L.P. Jackson, MS  5   111,930  12/96 9/96  100%  217,266 
                       
Pahrump Valley Apts. Pahrump, NV  32   1,318,163  7/96 7/96  100%  335,225 
                       
Park Meadow Apartments Gaylord, MI  80   1,397,814  9/95 4/97  100%  1,753,158 
                       
Shadowcreek Apartments Overton, NV  24   1,159,410  6/96 9/96  100%  361,320 
                       
Woodlands Apartments Elko, NV  24   1,156,417  11/95 9/95  100%  269,867 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 25

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Property

Name

 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  

 Acq

Date

  

 

Const

Comp

  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

  Location Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/12
  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/13
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/13
 
                              
Dunlap Acres West Point, MS 50 $764,995   9/96   4/96   100% $522,160  West Point, MS  50  $743,500  9/96 4/96  100% $522,160 
                        
Century East II Apts. Bismark, ND 24  399,319   8/96   6/96   100%  371,183 
                        
Clarke Manor Apts. Pokamoke City, MD 30  1,162,634   2/96   4/96   100%  440,107 
                                            
Hannah Heights Apts. Ethel, MS 28  773,654   6/96   12/96   100%  321,584  Ethel, MS  28   768,489  6/96 12/96  100%  321,584 
                                            
Heartland Green Cave Horse Cave, KY 24  799,061   5/96   11/96   100%  270,132  Horse Cave, KY  24   792,779  5/96 11/96  100%  270,132 
                                            
Hurricane Hills Hurricane, UT 49  907,989   9/96   4/97   100%  2,242,394  Hurricane, UT  49   860,507  9/96 4/97  100%  2,242,394 
                                            
Lenox Ave. Apts. Manhattan, NY 18  541,368   10/96   9/97   100%  955,524 
                        
Rose Square Connellsville, PA 11  373,894   10/96   2/97   100%  288,209  Connellsville, PA  11   363,406  10/96 2/97  100%  288,209 
                                            
Rosewood Estates, II Bladenboro, NC 16  651,720   9/96   12/96   100%  124,304  Bladenboro, NC  16   642,907  9/96 12/96  100%  124,304 
                                            
Shannon Rentals Shannon, MS 48  1,196,334   4/96   1/97   100%  324,990  Shannon, MS  48   1,187,606  4/96 1/97  100%  324,990 
                        
Wyandotte Apts. Los Angeles, CA 73  2,701,921   4/96   2/97   100%  2,280,623 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 26

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Property

Name

 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

 
                    
Academy Apts. West Point, VA 32 $1,109,521    4/97    3/98   100% $263,722 
                         
Brookhaven Apts. Shrevport, LA 35  992,659    2/97    1/97   100%  726,113 
                         
Butler Estates Leesville, LA 10  128,811    8/96    10/96   100%  129,311 
                         
Calgory Apts. I Bismark, ND 24  504,038    2/96    12/95   100%  414,507 
                         
Calgory Apts. II Bismark, ND 24  515,369    2/96    12/95   100%  414,507 
                         
Calgory Apts. III Bismark, ND 24  490,351    2/96    12/95   100%  414,507 
                         
Country Edge Apts. Fargo, ND 48  800,975    7/97    12/97   100%  1,128,587 
                         
Devonshire II Apts. London, OH 28  672,174    1/97    12/96   100%  182,070 
                         
 Devonshire West Apts. W. Jefferson, OH 19  473,414   1/97   1/97   100%  126,983 
                         
East Park II Apts. Dilworth, MN 24  428,528    8/96    8/96   100%  525,631 
                         
Edgewood Estates Apts.  Edgewood, TX 22  551,073   6/97   11/96   100%  173,436 
                         
Escher Street SRO Trenton, NJ 104  936,468    4/97    5/98   100%  3,734,928 

 

Property
Name

 Location Units  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
Academy Apts. West Point, VA  32  $1,102,274   4/97  3/98  100% $263,722 
                       
Brookhaven Apts. Shrevport, LA  35   961,770   2/97  1/97  100%  726,113 
                       
Butler Estates Leesville, LA  10   128,811   8/96  10/96  100%  129,311 
                       
Calgory Apts. I Bismark, ND  24   487,666   2/96  12/95  100%  414,507 
                       
Calgory Apts. II Bismark, ND  24   500,374   2/96  12/95  100%  414,507 
                       
Calgory Apts. III Bismark, ND  24   472,195   2/96  12/95  100%  414,507 
                       
Country Edge Apts. Fargo, ND  48   797,690   7/97  12/97  100%  1,128,587 
                       
Devonshire II Apts. London, OH  28   657,704   1/97  12/96  100%  182,070 
                       
Devonshire West Apts. W. Jefferson, OH  19   464,423   1/97  1/97  100%  126,983 
                       
East Park II Apts. Dilworth, MN  24   412,655   8/96  8/96  100%  525,631 
                       
Grandview Apartments Fargo, ND  36   912,362   8/96  8/96  100%  1,069,522 
                       
Grayson Manor Independence, VA  32   939,375   3/98  11/98  100%  656,156 
                       
Hallman Court Apts. Rochester, NY  77   8,047,190   1/99  7/00  100%  325,768 
                       
Hanover Apts. Ashland, VA  40   1,207,441   11/97  4/98  100%  295,538 
                       
Holly Heights Apts. Bowling Green, KY  30   956,304    5/97   8/97  100%  362,738 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 26

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Continued

 Property

Name

 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  

 Acq

Date

  

 

Const

Comp

  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

 
                    
Grandview Apartments Fargo, ND 36 $942,963    8/96    8/96   100% $1,069,522 
                         
Grayson Manor Independence, VA 32  952,504    3/98    11/98   100%  656,156 
                         
Hallman Court Apts. Rochester, NY 77  8,181,331    1/99    7/00   100%  325,768 
                         
Hanover Apts. Ashland, VA 40  1,215,797    11/97    4/98   100%  295,538 
                         
Hazeltine Apts. Los Angeles, CA 35  1,153,660    6/96    1/97   100%  1,606,155 
                         
Holly Heights Apts. Bowling Green, KY 30  987,852   5/97   8/97   100%  362,738 
                         
Lake Apts. IV Fargo, ND 24  540,120    2/96    12/95   100%  414,507 
                         
Lake Apts. V Fargo, ND 24  515,944    2/96    12/95   100%  414,507 
                         
Lauderdale County Properties  Meriden, MS 48  896,993   12/98   5/99   100%  444,136 
                         
 Little Valley Est. Little Valley, NY 24  1,097,729   1/97   4/97   100%  284,257 
                         
Maxton Green Apts. Maxton, NC 32  894,156    9/96    12/96   100%  263,281 
                         
Madison Apartments Miami Beach, FL 17  837,028    3/96    6/97   100%  911,695 
                         
Mason Manor Apts. Mason, TN 24  884,801    2/96    1/96   100%  229,775 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 26

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 2012

 

Property
Name

 Location Units  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
Lake Apts. IV Fargo, ND  24  $508,551   2/96  12/95  100% $414,507 
                       
Lake Apts. V Fargo, ND  24   500,465   2/96  12/95  100%  414,507 
                       
Lauderdale County Properties Meriden, MS  48   857,772    12/98   5/99  100%  444,136 
                       
Maxton Green Apts. Maxton, NC  32   882,560   9/96  12/96  100%  263,281 
                       
Madison Apartments Miami Beach, FL  17   808,233   3/96  6/97  100%  911,695 
                       
Mason Manor Apts. Mason, TN  24   878,785   2/96  1/96  100%  229,775 
                       
New Hope Bailey Apts. De Ridder, LA  40   758,397    8/96   9/96  100%  758,620 
                       
Park Ridge Apartments Jackson, TN  136   3,500,000   11/98  12/99  100%  854,147 
                       
Powell Valley Village Jonesville, VA  34   573,394    3/98   12/98  100%  1,423,248 
                       
Southwind Apts. A LDHA Jennings, LA  36   772,913   8/96  12/96  100%  700,216 
                       
T.R. Bobb Apts. New Iberia, LA  30   637,240   8/96  12/96  100%  714,504 
                       
Timmons- Ville Green Apts. Timmonsville, SC  32   1,012,710    10/96   2/97  100%  292,587 
                       
Village
Estates Apts.
 Victoria, VA  32   1,093,279    4/97   10/98  100%  270,204 
                       
Village Green Apts. Gloucester, VA  32   1,091,353    4/97   11/97  100%  296,893 
                       
Warrensburg Heights Warrensburg, MO  28   1,039,606   12/96  11/96  100%  308,825 
                       
Westside Apts. Salem, AR  29   903,222   8/96  10/96  100%  265,020 

Continued

 Property

Name

 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  

 Acq

Date

  

 Const

Comp

  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

 
                    
Mosby Forest Apts. Littleton, NC 24 $484,330    10/96    10/96   100% $496,753 
                         
New Hope Bailey Apts.  De Ridder, LA 40  767,430   8/96   9/96   100%  758,620 
                         
Nordhoff Apts. North Hills, CA 38  1,885,736    9/96    7/97   100%  1,787,961 
                         
Park Ridge Apartments Jackson, TN 136  3,500,000    11/98    12/99   100%  854,147 
                         
Powell Valley Village  Jonesville, VA 34  593,502   3/98   12/98   100%  1,423,248 
                         
Southwind Apts. A LDHA Jennings, LA 36  781,720    8/96    12/96   100%  700,216 
                         
T.R. Bobb Apts. New Iberia, LA 30  642,864    8/96    12/96   100%  714,504 
                         
Timmons- Ville Green Apts.  Timmonsville, SC 32  1,019,464   10/96   2/97   100%  292,587 
                         
Tremont Station Apartments  Tremont, PA 24  1,104,056   5/96   11/96   100%  349,889 
                         
Village Estates Apts.  Victoria, VA 32  1,100,655   4/97   10/98   100%  270,204 
                         
Village Green Apts.  Gloucester, VA 32  1,098,280   4/97   11/97   100%  296,893 
                         
Warrensburg Heights Warrensburg, MO 28  1,048,513    12/96    11/96   100%  308,825 
                         
Westside Apts. Salem, AR 29  983,191    8/96    10/96   100%  265,020 
                         
The Willows Apts. Smithville, TX 32  740,343    5/96    5/96   100%  209,768 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 27

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 2012

 Property

Name

 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  

 Acq

Date

  

 

Const

Comp

  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

 
                    
AHAB Rental Units Phase II Springfield, MO 17 $367,963    6/97    11/97   100% $578,458 
                         
Angelou Court Apts.  New York, NY 23  823,548   10/97   8/99   100%  1,791,275 
                         
Canisteo Manor Canisteo, NY 24  877,945    4/98    4/98   100%  621,857 
                         
The Casa Rosa San Juan, PR 97  209,242    9/97    4/98   100%  1,232,936 
                         
Forest Glen At Sulluy Station Phase II Atps. Centreville, VA 119  5,446,257    8/96    6/97   100%  1,362,808 
                         
Harrison Heights Apts.  Harrisonville, MO 48  963,807   1/98   12/96   100%  245,516 
                         
Holly Heights Apts.  Storm Lake, IA 32  447,195   4/97   8/98   100%  626,899 
                         
Lake Apts. II Fargo, ND 24  511,803    1/97    12/95   100%  396,024 
                         
Magnolia Place Apts.  Gautier, MS 40  500,000   11/97   1/98   100%  800,027 
                         
Northrock Apts. Topeka, KS 76  1,925,842    5/00    5/00   100%  610,365 
                         
Park Crest Apts. Sherwood, AR 216  8,295,000    11/99    6/99   100%  115,311 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 272013

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 2012

Continued

Property

Name

 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  

 Acq

Date

  

 Const

Comp

  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

  Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
             
AHAB Rental Units Phase II Springfield, MO  17  $360,342     6/97    11/97  100% $578,458 
                     
Angelou Court Apts. New York, NY  23   796,652    10/97   8/99  100%  1,791,275 
                     
Canisteo Manor Canisteo, NY  24   876,217   4/98  4/98  100%  621,857 
                     
The Casa Rosa San Juan, PR  97   214,883   9/97  4/98  100%  1,232,936 
                     
Forest Glen At Sulluy Station Phase II Atps. Centreville, VA  119   5,297,253       8/96      6/97  100%  1,362,808 
                     
Lake Apts. II Fargo, ND  24   496,429   1/97  12/95  100%  396,024 
                     
Magnolia Place Apts. Gautier, MS  40   500,000    11/97   1/98  100%  800,027 
                     
Northrock Apts. Topeka, KS  76   1,827,597   5/00  5/00  100%  610,365 
                     
Park Crest Apts. Sherwood, AR  216   8,095,000   11/99  6/99  100%  115,311 
                                      
Pear Village Apts. Leitchfile, KY 16 $136,691   8/96   2/97   100% $488,822  Leitchfile, KY  16   130,132    8/96   2/97  100%  488,822 
                                             
Randolph Village Silver Spring, MD 130  4,455,562   9/96   8/97   100%  2,240,075  Silver Spring, MD  130   4,318,897    9/96   8/97  100%  2,240,075 
                                             
Summer Hill Sr. Apts. Wayne, NJ 164  7,419,175   11/96   4/98   100%  2,337,000  Wayne, NJ  164   7,164,791    11/96   4/98  100%  2,337,000 
                                             
Sunday Sun Apts. Bowling Green, KY 30  666,600   10/96   12/96   100%  714,938  Bowling Green, KY  30   666,600   10/96  12/96  100%  714,938 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 28

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Property
Name
 Location Units Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                
1374 Boston Road L.P. New York, NY 15 $39,974   2/97   6/97   100% $522,065   New York, NY  15  $24,249    2/97   6/97  100% $522,065 
                        
Ashberry Manor Apts. Bardstown, KY 24  609,989   2/97   3/97   100%  561,330 
                                             
Bienville III Apts. Ringold, LA 32  913,020    2/97    2/97   100%  349,186  Ringold, LA  32   904,839   2/97  2/97  100%  349,186 
                                             
Blanchard Apts. Blanchard, LA 32  860,368    7/97    7/97   100%  307,218  Blanchard, LA  32   852,059   7/97  7/97  100%  307,218 
                                             
Chandler Village Apts Chandler, OK 32  862,975   4/97   7/97   100%  255,639  Chandler, OK  32   856,860    4/97   7/97  100%  255,639 
                                             
Cottonwood Apts. Cottonwood, LA 24  694,302    7/97    7/97   100%  248,058  Holly Grove, AR  24   812,111   2/97  4/97  100%  254,856 
                        
Cottonwood Apts. Holly Grove, AR 24  883,820    2/97    4/97   100%  254,856 
                        
Evangeline Apts. Lake Arthur, LA 32  929,592    11/97    1/98   100%  366,284 
                                             
Fairway Apts. II Marlette, MI 48  854,364    12/96    3/97   100%  255,353  Marlette, MI  48   825,043   12/96  3/97  100%  255,353 
                                             
Falcon Pointe Apts. Rosenburg, TX 102  2,758,386    4/98    10/99   100%  3,782,145  Rosenburg, TX  102   2,707,352   4/98  10/99  100%  3,782,145 
                                             
Jackson Place Apts. Jackson, LA 40  927,265   7/97   10/97   100%  983,615  Jackson, LA  40   914,301    7/97   10/97  100%  983,615 
                                             
Mapelwood Apts. Winnfield, LA 40  1,049,253    3/98    8/98   100%  922,119  Winnfield, LA  40   1,055,038   3/98  8/98  100%  922,119 
                                             
Neighborhood Restorations VII West Philadelphia, PA 72  390,071   2/98   2/98   100%  3,809,335  West Philadelphia, PA  72   101,785    2/98   2/98  100%  3,809,335 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 28

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Continued

 

 Property

Name

 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  

 Acq

Date

  

 

Const

Comp

  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

 
                    
Park Village Apts. Athens, TN 80 $1,054,817   10/98   6/99   100% $1,992,486 
                         
Pin Oak Village Bowie, MD 110  8,824,067    11/97    1/96   100%  3,880,319 
                         
Southern Villa Apts. Russellville, KY 32  1,282,394   11/97   4/98   100%  323,500 
                         
 Randolph Village Silver Spring, MD 130  4,455,562   12/97   8/97   100%  909,471 
                         
Sand Lane Manor Apts. Henderson, KY 24  600,910   8/97   4/98   100%  556,478 
                         
Senior Suites of Chicago Chicago, IL 84  3,937,866   12/97   12/98   100%  3,208,112 
                         
Sumner House Hartford, CT 79  946,125    1/98    7/98   100%  2,010,966 
                         
Terraceview Townhomes Apts. Litchfield MN 22  497,862   7/97   10/97   100%  726,402 
                         
Tilghman Square Dunn, NC 20  643,796    11/97    10/97   100%  307,605 
                         
Wellston Village Apts. Wellston, OK 14  358,652   4/97   8/97   100%  107,258 
                         
Yale Village Apts. Yale, OK 8  189,308   2/98   7/98   100%  74,341 

 

Property
Name

 Location Units  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
Park Village Apts. Athens, TN  80  $1,033,740    10/98   6/99  100% $1,992,486 
                       
Pin Oak Village Bowie, MD  110   8,578,894   11/97  1/96  100%  3,880,319 
                       
Southern Villa Apts. Russellville, KY  32   1,274,447    11/97   4/98  100%  323,500 
                       
Randolph Village Silver Spring, MD  130   4,318,897    12/97   8/97  100%  909,471 
            ��          
Sand Lane Manor Apts. Henderson, KY  24   592,326    8/97   4/98  100%  556,478 
                       
Senior Suites of Chicago Chicago, IL  84   3,918,061    12/97   12/98  100%  3,208,112 
                       
Sumner House Hartford, CT  79   917,354   1/98  7/98  100%  2,010,966 
                       
Terraceview Townhomes Apts. Litchfield MN  22   497,862    7/97   10/97  100%  726,402 
                       
Wellston Village Apts. Wellston, OK  14   356,433    4/97   8/97  100%  107,258 
                       
Yale Village Apts. Yale, OK  8   188,124    2/98   7/98  100%  74,341 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 29

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

 Property

Name

 Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/11

  

 Acq

Date

  

 

Const

Comp

  

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/12

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/12

 
                    
The Arbor Park Apts.  Jackson, MS 160 $5,060,000   12/96   6/98   100% $2,809,826 
                         
The Arbors Richmond, VA 85  4,339,742    7/97    11/98   83%  2,480,576 
                         
Barrington Cove Apts. Barrington, RI 60  1,811,515    4/97    5/97   100%  4,264,830 
                         
Bent Tree Apts. Jacksboro, TX 24  517,303    12/97    1/98   100%  161,552 
                         
Colonial Apts. Poplarville, MS 16  375,615    10/97    7/97   100%  86,039 
                         
Dogwood Apts. Appomattox, VA 48  1,302,281    10/98    5/99   100%  637,151 
                         
Emerald Trace Apts. Ruston, LA 48  1,251,184    8/98    4/99   100%  1,199,141 
                         
Edgewood Apts. Baker, LA 72  1,388,405    3/97    9/98   100%  1,856,539 
                         
Glenbrook Apts. Saint Jo, TX 24  430,032    12/97    3/97   100%  145,871 
                         
Harbor Pointe Apts. Benton Harbor, MI 84  1,336,793   1/99   10/99   100%  3,209,292 
                         
The Lincoln Hotel San Diego, CA 41  677,550   2/97   7/97   100%  697,511 
                         
Lutkin Bayou Apts. Drew, MS 36  777,370    11/97    6/97   100%  192,283 
                         
Nacodgoches Plaza Apts. Nacodgoches, TX 70  1,285,046    4/97    3/98   100%  2,793,695 
                         
Newcastle Apts. Collins, MS 36  616,902    9/97    6/98   100%  194,259 
                         
Park Crest Apts. Sherwood, AZ 216  8,295,000    2/98    6/99   100%  3,199,520 

 

Property
Name

 

 

 

Location

 

 

 

Units

  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
The Arbor Park Apts. Jackson, MS  160  $4,960,000    12/96   6/98  100% $2,809,826 
                       
The Arbors Richmond, VA  85   4,276,325   7/97  11/98  83%  2,480,576 
                       
Barrington Cove Apts. Barrington, RI  60   1,774,289   4/97  5/97  100%  4,264,830 
                       
Bent Tree Apts. Jacksboro, TX  24   505,258   12/97  1/98  100%  161,552 
                       
Colonial Apts. Poplarville, MS  16   373,074   10/97  7/97  100%  86,039 
                       
Dogwood Apts. Appomattox, VA  48   1,293,244   10/98  5/99  100%  637,151 
                       
Emerald Trace Apts. Ruston, LA  48   1,241,258   8/98  4/99  100%  1,199,141 
                       
Edgewood Apts. Baker, LA  72   1,359,524   3/97  9/98  100%  1,856,539 
                       
Glenbrook Apts. Saint Jo, TX  24   419,007   12/97  3/97  100%  145,871 
                       
Harbor Pointe Apts. Benton Harbor, MI  84   1,304,715    1/99   10/99  100%  3,209,292 
                       
The Lincoln Hotel San Diego, CA  41   661,567    2/97   7/97  100%  697,511 
                       
Lutkin Bayou Apts. Drew, MS  36   770,846   11/97  6/97  100%  192,283 
                       
Nacodgoches Plaza Apts. Nacodgoches, TX  70   1,239,094   4/97  3/98  100%  2,793,695 
                       
Newcastle Apts. Collins, MS  36   616,157   9/97  6/98  100%  194,259 
                       
Park Crest Apts. Sherwood, AZ  216   8,095,000   2/98  6/99  100%  3,199,520 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 29

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Continued

 


Property

Name

 Location  Units Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  Location 

 

 

Units

 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                 
Palmetto Place Apts. Benton, LA  40  $1,208,587   10/98   4/99   100% $1,153,878  Benton, LA  40  $1,206,122   10/98  4/99  100% $1,153,878 
                                                
Pecan Hill Apts. Bryson, TX  16   329,646   8/97   1/98   100%  110,600  Bryson, TX  16   321,970   8/97  1/98  100%  110,600 
                                                
Regency Apts. Poplarville, MS  16   375,615   10/97   7/97   100%  102,419  Poplarville, MS  16   430,820   10/97  7/97  100%  102,419 
                                                
Rhome Apts. Rhome, TX  24   433,498   12/97   2/97   100%  160,551  Rhome, TX  24   422,384   12/97  2/97  100%  160,551 
                                                
Westfield Apts. Welsh, LA  40   737,924   11/97   8/98   100%  918,605  Welsh, LA  40   729,155   11/97  8/98  100%  918,605 
                                                
Willow Point Apts. III Jackson, MS  120   4,305,000   12/96   2/98   100%  2,035,596  Jackson, MS  120   4,132,063    12/96   2/98  100%  2,035,596 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 30

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

  


Property

Name

 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
 
                     
Country Estates
Apts.
 Farmville,
VA
  24  $856,244   3/98   7/99   100% $223,562 
                           
Emerald Trace II Apts Ruston,
LA
  24   239,602   7/98   12/98   100%  717,594 
                           
Farewell
Mills
Apts.
 Lisbon,
ME
  27   752,969   8/97   3/98   100%  662,864 
                           
Hillside
Terrace
Apts.
 Poughkeepsie,
NY
  64   1,617,324   4/99   7/00   100%  542,326 
                           
Lakewood Apts. Clarksville,
VA
  52   1,487,746   3/98   10/99   100%  394,349 
                           
Lone
Oak
Apts.
 Graham,
TX
  64   1,321,653   8/97   9/98   100%  408,634 
                           
Millwood
Park
Apts.
 Douglasville,
GA
  172   6,929,737   12/98   11/99   100%  971,164 
                           
New
River
Gardens
 Radford,
VA
  48   1,396,640   10/98   5/99   100%  637,321 
                           
Nocona
Terrace
Apts.
 Nocona,
TX
  36   665,957   8/97   12/98   100%  249,394 
                           
Northgate Apts. Bryant,
AR
  20   557,214   4/99   11/99   100%  834,557 

 

Property
Name

 Location Units  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
Country Estates Apts. Farmville, VA  24  $851,245    3/98   7/99  100% $223,562 
                       
Emerald Trace II Apts Ruston, LA  24   239,602     7/98    12/98  100%  717,594 
                       
Farewell Mills Apts. Lisbon, ME  27   750,193    8/97   3/98  100%  662,864 
                       
Hillside Terrace Apts. Poughkeepsie, NY  64   1,586,629    4/99   7/00  100%  542,326 
                       
Lakewood Apts. Clarksville, VA  52   1,479,164   3/98  10/99  100%  394,349 
                       
Lone Oak Apts. Graham, TX  64   1,292,971    8/97   9/98  100%  408,634 
                       
New River Gardens Radford, VA  48   1,386,887    10/98   5/99  100%  637,321 
                       
Nocona Terrace Apts. Nocona, TX  36   642,221    8/97   12/98  100%  249,394 
                       
Northgate Apts. Bryant, AR  20   557,214    4/99   11/99  100%  834,557 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 30

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Continued

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  

 

 

Location

 

 

 

Units

 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                 
Park Trace Apts. Jackson,
TN
  84  $1,432,792   11/97   3/99   100% $3,353,303  Jackson, TN  84  $1,404,163  11/97 3/99  100% $3,353,303 
                                                
Pine Forest Apts. Dahlgren,
VA
  40   1,792,609   3/98   2/99   100%  503,181  Dahlgren, VA  40   1,781,408  3/98 2/99  100%  503,181 
                                                
Riverbend Apts. Swanzey,
NH
  24   525,056   7/97   2/98   100%  1,321,798  Swanzey, NH  24   512,556  7/97 2/98  100%  1,321,798 
                                                
Royal
Crest Apts.
 Bowie,
TX
  48   897,337   8/97   10/98   100%  337,545  Bowie, TX  48   865,355  8/97 10/98  100%  337,545 
                                                
Trinity Life Gardens Pueblo,
CO
  44   973,336   4/99   12/99   100%  1,952,175  Pueblo, CO  44   930,426  4/99 12/99  100%  1,952,175 
                                                
Western Trails Apts. Council Bluffs,
IA
  30   843,433   7/98   6/99   100%  912,827  Council Bluffs, IA  30   829,988  7/98 6/99  100%  912,827 
                                                
Whistle
Stop Apts.
 Gentry,
AR
  27   702,077   9/97   5/98   100%  726,507  Gentry, AR  27   694,893  9/97 5/98  100%  726,507 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 31

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
 
                      
Bent
Tree Apts.
 San Angelou,
TX
  112  $2,292,002   12/97   7/99   100% $3,521,950 
                           
Brittney
Square Apts.
 Bowling
Green,
KY
  20   489,583   7/98   7/98   100%  629,917 
                           
Canton
Manor Apts.
 Canton,
MS
  32   756,203   11/97   7/98   100%  271,306 
                           
Canton
Village Apts.
 Canton,
MS
  42   1,066,524   11/97   7/98   100%  363,557 
                           
Double
Springs
Manor II Apts.
 Bowling
Green,
KY
  25   288,825   9/98   3/99   100%  985,432 
                           
Eagles
Ridge Terrace
 Decatur,
TX
  89   1,587,593   12/97   5/98   100%  467,063 
                           
Elmwood Apts. Ellisville,
MS
  32   579,527   12/97   6/98   100%  243,483 
                           
Giles
Apts.
 Amelia,
VA
  16   689,775   3/98   2/99   100%  183,711 
                           
Henderson
Terrace Apts.
 Bridgeport, TX  24   455,949   11/97   9/98   100%  120,846 
                           
Hurricane Hills Hurricane, UT  28   611,647   9/97   8/98   100%  2,020,271 
                           
Madison
Height Apts.
 Canton,
MS
  80   2,101,841   11/97   7/98   100%  786,614 
                           
Lakeview
Court
 City of
Little Elm,
TX
  24   389,080   11/97   1/99   100%  83,390 
                           
Mesquite
Trails
 Jacksboro,
TX
  35   597,288   11/97   11/98   100%  193,766 

 

Property
Name

 

 

 

Location

 

 

 

Units

  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
Brittney Square Apts. Bowling Green, KY  20  $471,078  7/98 7/98  100% $629,917 
                       
Canton Manor Apts. Canton, MS  32   746,431  11/97 7/98  100%  271,306 
                       
Canton Village Apts. Canton, MS  42   1,055,178  11/97 7/98  100%  363,557 
                       
Double Springs Manor II Apts. Bowling Green, KY  25   276,416  9/98 3/99  100%  985,432 
                       
Eagles Ridge Terrace Decatur, TX  89   1,553,615  12/97 5/98  100%  467,063 
                       
Elmwood Apts. Ellisville, MS  32   567,550  12/97 6/98  100%  243,483 
                       
Giles Apts. Amelia, VA  16   685,435  3/98 2/99  100%  183,711 
                       
Henderson Terrace Apts. Bridgeport, TX  24   446,207  11/97 9/98  100%  120,846 
                       
Hurricane Hills Hurricane, UT  28   585,316  9/97 8/98  100%  2,020,271 
                       
Madison Height Apts. Canton, MS  80   2,079,459  11/97 7/98  100%  786,614 
                       
Lakeview Court City of Little Elm, TX  24   380,766  11/97 1/99  100%  83,390 
                       
Mesquite Trails Jacksboro, TX  35   584,526  11/97 11/98  100%  193,766 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 31

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Continued

 

Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
 
                      
Munjoy South
Townhouse
Apts.
 Portland,
ME
  140  $3,065,995   9/97   10/98   100% $777,411 
                           
Nottoway
Manor
 Blackstone,
VA
  28   822,342   3/98   4/99   100%  214,977 
                           
Parktowne
Apts.
 Cleveland,
TN
  84   1,388,842   11/97   6/98   100%  3,363,097 
                           
Park
Ridge Apts.
 McKee,
KY
  22   847,643   10/97   5/98   100%  338,464 
                           
Pilot Point
Apts.
 Pilot Point,
VA
  40   670,776   11/97   2/99   100%  142,680 
                           
Plantation Ridge Sugar Hill,
GA
  218   11,290,000   5/98   5/99   100%  1,974,354 
                           
Riverbend
Apts.
 Bedford,
ME
  28   710,979   10/97   7/98   100%  1,578,561 
                           
Roth
Village
 Mechanicsburg,
PA
  61   1,795,343   10/97   9/98   100%  2,664,992 
                           
Royal Estates Apts. Canton,
MS
  32   800,291   11/97   7/98   100%  282,525 
                           
Silver
Creek Apts.
 Flat Rock,
MI
  112   2,888,994   3/98   8/99   100%  4,535,381 
                           
Springs
Manor Apts.
 Rawls Spring,
MS
  32   779,592   12/97   6/98   100%  328,693 
                           
Western Hills Apts. Ferris,
TX
  16   399,124   5/00   9/00   100% $91,419 
                           
Windsor
Park Apts.
 Jackson,
MS
  279   6,900,000   11/97   3/99   100%  2,891,603 
Property
Name
 

 

 

Location

 

 

 

Units

  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
Munjoy South Townhouse Apts. Portland, ME  140  $2,983,941  9/97 10/98  100% $777,411 
                       
Nottoway Manor Blackstone, VA  28   816,671  3/98 4/99  100%  214,977 
                       
Parktowne Apts. Cleveland, TN  84   1,361,091  11/97 6/98  100%  3,363,097 
                       
Park Ridge Apts. McKee, KY  22   841,899  10/97 5/98  100%  338,464 
                       
Pilot Point Apts. Pilot Point, VA  40   656,444  11/97 2/99  100%  142,680 
                       
Plantation Ridge Sugar Hill, GA  218   11,290,000  5/98 5/99  100%  1,974,354 
                       
Riverbend Apts. Bedford, ME  28   700,510  10/97 7/98  100%  1,578,561 
                       
Roth Village Mechanicsburg, PA  61   1,759,303  10/97 9/98  100%  2,664,992 
                       
Royal Estates Apts. Canton, MS  32   793,267  11/97 7/98  100%  282,525 
                       
Silver Creek Apts. Flat Rock, MI  112   2,818,172  3/98 8/99  100%  4,535,381 
                       
Springs Manor Apts. Rawls Spring, MS  32   771,380  12/97 6/98  100%  328,693 
                       
Western Hills Apts. Ferris, TX  16   391,372  5/00 9/00  100% $91,419 
                       
Windsor Park Apts. Jackson, MS  279   6,800,000  11/97 3/99  100%  2,891,603 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 32

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                   
Chardonnay Apts. Oklahoma City,
OK
  14  $13,584   1/98   1/97   100% $393,700  Oklahoma City, OK  14  $2,853  1/98 1/97  100% $393,700 
                                                
Cogic
Village Apts.
 Benton Harbor,
MI
  136   2,164,481   4/98   7/99   100%  6,669,762  Benton Harbor, MI  136   2,134,459  4/98 7/99  100%  6,669,762 
                                                
Courtside Apts. Cottonwood,
AZ
  44   766,154   6/98   7/98   100%  1,667,188  Cottonwood, AZ  44   744,639  6/98 7/98  100%  1,667,188 
                                                
Clear
Creek Apts.
 N. Manchester,
IN
  64   1,290,068   7/98   9/99   100%  2,112,665  N. Manchester, IN  64   1,262,677  7/98 9/99  100%  2,112,665 
                                                
Columbia
Luxar
 Dallas,
TX
  125   3,155,107   8/98   12/99   100%  3,947,106  Dallas, TX  125   3,087,032  8/98 12/99  100%  3,947,106 
                                                
Colony Park Apts. Pearl,
MS
  192   7,955,000   6/98   12/99   100%  2,911,900  Pearl, MS  192   7,900,000  6/98 12/99  100%  2,911,900 
                                                
Hallman Court Apts. Rochester,
NY
  77   8,181,331   1/99   7/00   100%  266,536  Rochester, NY  77   8,047,190  1/99 7/00  100%  266,536 
                                                
Parkside Plaza Apts New York,
NY
  39   1,315,939   7/99   5/01   100%  2,764,603  New York, NY  39   1,311,566  7/99 5/01  100%  2,764,603 
                                                
Park
Ridge Apts.
 Jackson,
TN
  136   3,500,000   11/98   12/99   100%  1,672,917  Jackson, TN  136   3,500,000  11/98 12/99  100%  1,672,917 
                                                
Park
Village Apts.
 Athens,
TN
  80   1,054,817   10/98   6/99   100%  1,503,103  Athens, TN  80   1,033,740  10/98 6/99  100%  1,503,103 
                                                
Pearlwood Apts. Pearl,
MS
  40   798,617   2/98   5/98   100%  745,648  Pearl, MS  40   769,051  2/98 5/98  100%  745,648 
                                                
Rose Villa
Apts.
 Ganado,
TX
  8   169,006   5/01   11/01   100%  51,582  Ganado, TX  8   161,435  5/01 11/01  100%  51,582 
                                                
Pecan Manor Apts. Natchitoches,
LA
  40   732,666   7/98   10/98   100%  1,501,914  Natchitoches, LA  40   725,172  7/98 10/98  100%  1,501,914 
                                                
Pineridge Apts. Franklinton,
LA
  40   750,074   7/98   1/99   100%  1,497,889  Franklinton, LA  40   742,334  7/98 1/99  100%  1,497,889 
                                                
Sterling Creek Apts. Independence,
MO
  48   704,462   5/98   5/00   100%  1,973,594  Independence, MO  48   669,596  5/98 5/00  100%  1,973,594 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 33

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                   
Bradford
Park Apts.
 Southhaven,
MS
  208  $9,670,000   10/98   12/99   100% $302,884  Southhaven, MS  208  $9,670,000  10/98 12/99  100% $302,884 
                                                
Columbia Luxar Dallas,
TX
  125   3,155,107   8/98   12/99   100%  3,947,106  Dallas, TX  125   3,087,032  8/98 12/99  100%  3,947,106 
                                                
Foxridge Apts. Durham,
NC
  92   2,692,463   3/98   7/99   100%  3,652,119  Durham, NC  92   2,632,755  3/98 7/99  100%  3,652,119 
                                                
Harbor Pointe Benton Harbor,
MI
  84   1,336,793   1/99   10/99   100%  1,157,091  Benton Harbor, MI  84   1,304,715  1/99 10/99  100%  1,157,091 
                                                
Merchant Court Dallas,
GA
  192   5,199,715   10/98   12/99   100%  2,422,226  Dallas, GA  192   5,073,951  10/98 12/99  100%  2,422,226 
                                                
Northrock Apts. Topeka,
KS
  76   1,925,842   5/99   5/00   100%  1,133,534  Topeka, KS  76   1,827,597  5/99 5/00  100%  1,133,534 
                                                
Stearns-Assisted Millinocket,
ME
  20   435,500   12/99   3/01   100%  675,984  Millinocket, ME  20   435,500  12/99 3/01  100%  675,984 
                                                
Stonewall
Retirement Village
 Stonewall,
LA
  40   1,124,839   7/98   1/99   100%  1,495,966  Stonewall, LA  40   1,139,298  7/98 1/99  100%  1,495,966 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 34

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
 
                      
Abby Ridge Apts. Elizabethtown,
KY
  24  $350,030   2/00   1/00   100% $1,577,723 
                           
Allison Apts. Mt. Washington,
KY
  24   515,099   11/98   1/99   100%  850,013 
                           
Belmont
Affordable Housing Two Apts.
 Philadelphia,
PA
  20   317,244   1/99   12/99   100%  1,829,040 
                           
Boerne
Creekside Apts.
 Boerne,
TX
  71   1,742,141   11/98   6/00   100%  2,324,652 
                           
Bradford Park Apts. Southaven,
MS
  208   9,670,000   3/99   12/99   100%  2,868,684 
                           
Hillside
Club Apts.
 Bear Creek Township,
MI
  56   1,470,693   10/98   12/99   100%  2,097,333 
                           
Howard Park Apts Florida City,
FL
  16   329,144   4/99   12/99   100%  681,334 
                           
Kerrville
Meadows Apts.
 Kerrville,
TX
  72   1,347,771   11/98   4/00   100%  2,335,827 
                           
Merchant
Court Apts.
 Dallas,
GA
  192   5,199,715   10/98   12/99   100%  4,718,773 
                           
Millwood
Park Apts.
 Douglasville,
GA
  172   6,929,737   12/98   11/99   100%  1,870,576 
                           
Northwood Homes Leitchfield,
KY
  24   611,283   4/99   6/99   100%  1,185,712 
                           
Romeo
Village Apts.
 Montour
Falls,
NY
  24   1,007,320   10/98   4/99   100%  753,362 
                           
Summer Park Apts. Jackson,
MS
  216   9,870,000   10/99   6/00   100%  1,106,814 
                           
Washington Courtyards Houston,
TX
  74   2,258,254   8/99   8/00   100%  1,448,573 

 

Property
Name

 Location Units  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
Abby Ridge Apts. Elizabethtown, KY  24  $334,718  2/00 1/00  100% $1,577,723 
                       
Allison Apts. Mt. Washington, KY  24   460,530  11/98 1/99  100%  850,013 
                       
Belmont Affordable Housing Two Apts. Philadelphia, PA  20   286,312  1/99 12/99  100%  1,829,040 
                       
Boerne Creekside Apts. Boerne, TX  71   1,698,458  11/98 6/00  100%  2,324,652 
                       
Bradford Park Apts. Southaven, MS  208   9,670,000  3/99 12/99  100%  2,868,684 
                       
Hillside Club Apts. Bear Creek Township, MI  56   1,437,572  10/98 12/99  100%  2,097,333 
                       
Howard Park Apts Florida City, FL  16   329,144  4/99 12/99  100%  681,334 
                       
Kerrville Meadows Apts. Kerrville, TX  72   1,312,442  11/98 4/00  100%  2,335,827 
                       
Merchant Court Apts. Dallas, GA  192   5,073,951  10/98 12/99  100%  4,718,773 
                       
Northwood Homes Leitchfield, KY  24   588,091  4/99 6/99  100%  1,185,712 
                       
Romeo Village Apts. Montour Falls, NY  24   1,005,352  10/98 4/99  100%  753,362 
                       
Summer Park Apts. Jackson, MS  216   9,570,000  10/99 6/00  100%  1,106,814 
                       
Washington Courtyards Houston, TX  74   2,209,001  8/99 8/00  100%  1,448,573 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 35

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
 
                      
Ashton
Cove Apts.
 Kingsland,
GA
  72  $1,653,808   1/00   4/00   100% $2,664,000 
                           
Autumn Park Dickson,
TN
  104   3,110,000   4/99   12/99   100%  1,637,797 
                           
Brazoswood Apts. Clute,
TX
  72   1,855,833   7/99   7/00   100%  3,074,829 
                           
Columbia Woods Townhomes Newman,
GA
  120   3,980,954   10/00   6/02   100%  1,310,103 
                           
Country
Walk Apts.
 Mulvane,
KS
  68   1,469,953   12/98   11/99   100%  1,923,697 
                           
Cypress
Pointe
Retirement Apts.
 Casa Grande,
AZ
  104   1,683,402   4/99   3/00   100%  2,680,499 
                           
Garden
Gates Apts. II
 New Caney,
TX
  32   686,174   3/99   3/00   100%  1,067,950 
                           
Hillside
Terrace Apts.
 Poughkeepsie, NY  64   1,617,324   4/99   7/00   100%  3,977,051 
                           
Riverwalk
Apt. Homes Phase II
 Sheboygan,
WI
  20   335,595   12/98   7/99   100%  1,354,092 
                           
Washington Courtyards Houston,
TX
  74   2,258,254   8/99   8/00   100%  606,140 
                           
Wedgewood Park Apts. Evans,
GA
  180   4,786,565   12/99   8/00   100%  3,551,820 

 

Property
Name

 

 

 

Location

 

 

 

Units

  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
Ashton Cove Apts. Kingsland, GA  72  $1,598,966  1/00 4/00  100% $2,664,000 
                       
Autumn Park Dickson, TN  104   3,085,000  4/99 12/99  100%  1,637,797 
                       
Columbia Woods Townhomes Newman, GA  120   3,910,591  10/00 6/02  100%  1,310,103 
                       
Country Walk Apts. Mulvane, KS  68   1,391,521  12/98 11/99  100%  1,923,697 
                       
Cypress Pointe Retirement Apts. Casa Grande, AZ  104   1,648,593  4/99 3/00  100%  2,680,499 
                       
Garden Gates Apts. II New Caney, TX  32   696,261  3/99 3/00  100%  1,067,950 
                       
Hillside Terrace Apts. Poughkeepsie, NY  64   1,586,629  4/99 7/00  100%  3,977,051 
                       
Riverwalk Apt. Homes Phase II Sheboygan, WI  20   320,593  12/98 7/99  100%  1,354,092 
                       
Washington Courtyards Houston, TX  74   2,209,001  8/99 8/00  100%  606,140 
                       
Wedgewood Park Apts. Evans, GA  180   4,683,690  12/99 8/00  100%  3,551,820 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 36

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
 
                      
Annadale
Apts.
 Fresno,
CA
  222  $15,472,819   1/00   6/90   100% $548,563 
                           
Ashton
Ridge
 Jackson,
MI
  144   2,469,988   2/00   12/00   100%  1,430,296 
                           
Farmington
Meadows
 Aloha,
OR
  69   2,137,337   8/99   11/99   100%  865,369 
                           
Nowata
Village
 Nowata,
OK
  28   1,209,453   8/99   2/00   100%  330,497 
                           
Paris
Place
 Paris,
KY
  32   1,093,761   6/00   9/00   100%  930,412 
                           
Riverview
Bend Apts.
 Cystal City,
MO
  94   2,780,000   11/99   3/00   100%  1,210,500 
                           
Senior Suites
Of Chicago
Washington
Heights
 Chicago,
IL
  85   3,438,284   12/99   11/00   100%  2,243,090 
                           
Valleyview
Estates
Apts.
 Branson
West,
MO
  32   325,169   11/99   5/00   100%  1,306,789 
                           
Wedgewood
Park Apts.
 Evans,
GA
  180   4,786,565   12/99   8/00   100%  3,551,820 
                           
Willowbrook
Apts.
 Lafayette,
LA
  40   837,712   6/99   9/99   100%  1,200,789 
                           
Wingfield
Apts.
 Kinder,
LA
  40   652,519   6/99   7/99   100%  1,645,817 
Property
Name
 Location Units  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
Ashton Ridge Jackson, MI  144  $2,435,728   2/00  12/00  100% $1,430,296 
                       
Nowata Village Nowata, OK  28   1,202,205   8/99  2/00  100%  330,497 
                       
Paris Place Paris, KY  32   1,072,653   6/00  9/00  100%  930,412 
                       
Riverview Bend Apts. Cystal City, MO  94   2,730,625   11/99  3/00  100%  1,210,500 
                       
Senior Suites Of Chicago Washington Heights Chicago, IL  85   3,437,052     12/99    11/00  100%  2,243,090 
                       
Valleyview Estates Apts. Branson West, MO  32   309,049    11/99   5/00  100%  1,306,789 
                       
Wedgewood Park Apts. Evans, GA  180   4,683,690   12/99  8/00  100%  3,551,820 
                       
Willowbrook Apts. Lafayette, LA  40   800,748   6/99  9/99  100%  1,200,789 
                       
Wingfield Apts. Kinder, LA  40   648,213   6/99  7/99  100%  1,645,817 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 37

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
 
                      
Ashton Ridge Apts. Jackson,
MS
  144  $2,469,988   02/00   12/00   100% $6,003,938 
                           
Baldwin
Villas
 Pontiac,
MI
  65   4,741,361   10/99   7/01   100%  1,678,972 
                           
Columbia
Woods
Townhomes
 Newnan,
GA
  120   3,980,954   10/00   6/02   100%  3,285,137 
                           
Senior
Suites of
Washington
Heights
 Chicago,
IL
  85   3,438,284   12/99   11/00   100%  2,243,090 
                           
Silver
Pond Apts.
 Wallingford,
CT
  160   3,558,082   6/00   12/01   100%  1,563,634 
                           
Stearns
Assisted
Apts.
 Millinocket,
ME
  20   435,500   12/99   3/01   100%  1,407,173 
                           
Summer
Park
 Jackson,
MS
  216   9,870,000   10/99   6/00   100%  2,379,767 

 

Property

Name

 

 

 

Location

 

 

 

Units

  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
Ashton Ridge Apts. Jackson, MS  144  $2,435,728   02/00  12/00  100% $6,003,938 
                       
Baldwin Villas Pontiac, MI  65   4,839,032   10/99  7/01  100%  1,678,972 
                       
Columbia Woods Townhomes Newnan, GA  120   3,910,591    10/00   6/02  100%  3,285,137 
                       
Senior Suites of Washington Heights Chicago, IL  85   3,437,052     12/99    11/00  100%  2,243,090 
                       
Silver Pond Apts. Wallingford, CT  160   3,386,730   6/00  12/01  100%  1,563,634 
                       
Stearns Assisted Apts. Millinocket, ME  20   435,500    12/99   3/01  100%  1,407,173 
                       
Summer Park Jackson, MS  216   9,570,000   10/99  6/00  100%  2,379,767 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 38

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Property
Name
 Location  Units Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  

 

 

Location

 

 

 

Units

 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                 
Andover Crossing
Apts.
 Andover, KS  80  $2,046,028   5/00   

12/00
   100% $1,772,874  Andover, KS  80  $2,285,846    5/00   12/00  100% $1,772,874 
                                                
Arbors at Eagle Crest Apts. Mount Pleasant, MI  120   2,248,063   12/00   
10/01
   100%  3,512,499  Mount Pleasant, MI  120   2,216,883    12/00   10/01  100%  3,512,499 
                                                
Bristow Place Apts. Bristow, OK  28   1,195,884   6/01   
12/00
   100%  487,648  Bristow, OK  28   1,189,309   6/01  12/00  100%  487,648 
                                                
Columbia Creek Apts. Woodstock, GA  172   5,049,265   8/01   
11/01
   100%  2,795,601  Woodstock, GA  172   4,957,414   8/01  11/01  100%  2,795,601 
                                                
Cushing
Place
Apts.
 Cushing, OK  24   1,066,091   3/00   

10/00
   100%  428,559  Cushing, OK  24   1,060,142    3/00   10/00  100%  428,559 
                                                
Hammond
Place
Apts.
 Hammond, LA  40   406,483   3/00   

4/00
   100%  1,706,341  Hammond, LA  40   406,483    3/00   4/00  100%  1,706,341 
                                                
Shoreham Apts. Houston, TX  120   3,153,867   4/00   7/01   100%  6,138,485  Houston, TX  120   3,084,836   4/00  7/01  100%  6,138,485 
                                                
Vanderbilt
Apts.
 Edna,
TX
  12   268,365   

5/01

   

10/01

   100%  104,181  Edna, TX  12   258,804   5/01  10/01  100%  104,181 
                                                
Whitley Park Apts. Whitley City, KY  21   869,309   6/00   6/00   100%  302,339  Whitley City, KY  21   862,915   6/00  6/00  100%  302,339 
                                                
Willowbrook
II Apts.
 Lafayette,
LA
  40   734,753   3/00   5/00   100%  1,247,680  Lafayette, LA  40   697,008   3/00  5/00  100%  1,247,680 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 39

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  

 

 

Location

 

 

 

Units

 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                 
Arbors at Eagle Crest Apts. Mount Pleasant,
MI
  120  $2,248,063   12/00   10/01   100% $3,512,499  Mount Pleasant, MI  120  $2,216,883    12/00   10/01  100% $3,512,499 
                                                
Arbors at Ironwood Apts. Mishawaka,
IN
  88   1,634,317   7/00   9/01   100%  3,772,295  Mishawaka, IN  88   1,615,694    7/00   9/01  100%  3,772,295 
                                                
Austin Acres Atps. Hopkinsville, KY  32   798,687   11/00   9/01   100%  1,275,155 
Austin Acres Apts. Hopkinsville, KY  32   788,980   11/00  9/01  100%  1,275,155 
                                                
Columbia Creek Apts. Woodstock,
GA
  172   5,049,265   8/01   

11/01

   100%  2,909,708  Woodstock, GA  172   4,957,414   8/01  11/01  100%  2,909,708 
                                                
Daystar Village Apts. Bowling Green,
KY
  32   696,473   2/01   1/01   100%  1,113,443  Bowling Green, KY  32   682,049    2/01   1/01  100%  1,113,443 
                                                
Hillview
Apts.
 Leitchfield,
KY
  34   832,610   5/01   12/01   100%  327,226  Leitchfield, KY  34   819,148   5/01  12/01  100%  327,226 
                                                
Pine Grove Community Gouverneur, NY  48   1,080,558   12/00   10/01   100%  3,077,767  Gouverneur, NY  48   1,064,948   12/00  10/01  100%  3,077,767 
                                                
Tally-Ho
Apts.
 Campti,
CA
  26   531,559   6/01   12/01   100%  485,057  Campti, CA  26   522,484   6/01  12/01  100%  485,057 
                                                
Timber Trails Apts. Pineville,
LA
  32   765,513   6/01   7/01   100%  499,829  Pineville, LA  32   755,346    6/01   7/01  100%  499,829 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 40

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
 
                      
Arbors @ Ironwood Apts. II Mishawaka,
IN
  40  $814,098   2/01   11/01   100% $1,771,758 
                           
Baldwin Villas Apts. Pontiac,
MI
  65   4,741,361   8,01   7/01   100%  344,405 
                           
Carlyle Apts. Aberdeen,
SD
  44   565,673   2/01   6/01   100%  1,359,155 
                           
Center Place Apts. Center,
TX
  32   744,794   08/01   10/01   100%  428,835 
                           
Eagle Lake Gardens
Apts.
 Azle,
TX
  60   1,060,026   10/01   5/02   100%  666,179 
                           
Londontown Homes Apts. London,
KY
  24   467,976   2/01   6/01   100%  1,836,027 
                           
Mason's Point Apts. Hopkinsville,
KY
  41   1,216,256   06/01   7/02   100%  1,824,270 
                           
Meadowside
Apts.
 Milo,
NY
  40   1,560,395   05/01   12/01   100%  855,372 
                           
Northrock
Apts. II
 Topeka,
KS
  60   2,054,032   07/01   5/02   100%  1,838,666 
                           
Oakland
Apts.
 Oakdale,
LA
  46   1,191,425   2/01   7/01   100%  767,451 
                           
Parkview Apts. Springfield, MA  25   1,110,294   2/01   2/02   100%  1,221,510 
                           
Sedgewick
Sundance Apts.
 Sedgewick,
KS
  24   334,466   09/01   10/01   100%  1,372,208 
                           
Southbrook
Humes Apts.
 Kily,
KY
  24   411,884   04/01   11/01   100%  1,866,896 
                           
Shalom Plaza Apts. Kansas City,
MO
  126   3,425,739   08/01   11/01   100%  1,273,119 
                           
Springfield
Crossing
 Springfield,
VA
  347   25,289,821   6/02   10/01   100%  718,652 
                           
Western Gardens
Apts.
 Dequincey,
LA
  48   1,244,286   2/01   7/01   100%  782,188 

 

Property
Name

 Location Units  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
Arbors @ Ironwood Apts. II Mishawaka, IN  40  $799,279    2/01   11/01  100% $1,771,758 
                       
Baldwin Villas Apts. Pontiac, MI  65   4,839,032    8/01   7/01  100%  344,405 
                       
Carlyle Apts. Aberdeen, SD  44   450,940   2/01  6/01  100%  1,359,155 
                       
Center Place Apts. Center, TX  32   736,288   08/01  10/01  100%  428,835 
                       
Eagle Lake Gardens Apts. Azle, TX  60   1,035,236    10/01   5/02  100%  666,179 
                       
Londontown Homes Apts. London, KY  24   450,956   2/01  6/01  100%  1,836,027 
                       
Mason's Point Apts. Hopkinsville, KY  41   1,214,883   06/01  7/02  100%  1,824,270 
                       
Meadowside Apts. Milo, NY  40   1,557,388   05/01  12/01  100%  855,372 
                       
Northrock Apts. II Topeka, KS  60   1,996,870   07/01  5/02  100%  1,838,666 
                       
Oakland Apts. Oakdale, LA  46   1,180,288   2/01  7/01  100%  767,451 
                       
Parkview Apts. Springfield, MA  25   1,098,805   2/01  2/02  100%  1,221,510 
                       
Sedgewick Sundance Apts. Sedgewick, KS  24   328,821    09/01   10/01  100%  1,372,208 
                       
Southbrook Humes Apts. Kily, KY  24   395,356   04/01  11/01  100%  1,866,896 
                       
Shalom Plaza Apts. Kansas City, MO  126   3,361,889   08/01  11/01  100%  1,273,119 
                       
Springfield Crossing Springfield, VA  347   24,980,759   6/02  10/01  100%  718,652 
                       
Western Gardens Apts. Dequincey, LA  48   1,231,713    2/01   7/01  100%  782,188 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 41

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
 
                      
Bienville
Apts.
 Ringhold,
LA
  32  $750,234   12/01   11/01   100% $488,488 
                           
Breezewood
Villas I
 Frederiksted,
VI
  12   969,409   10/01   6/02   100%  494,361 
                           
Cedar Grove Apartments Phase I Shepherdsville,
KY
  36   1,013,584   5/02   7/01   100%  424,955 
                           
Cranberry Cove Apartments Beckley,
WV
  28   962,634   5/02   1/02   100%  514,844 
                           
Dawson Square Thornton,
CO
  36   1,626,573   7/02   

12/03

   100%  605,962 
                           
Forest Glen Village Vidalia,
GA
  46   1,260,827   

4/03

   

2/95

   100%  21,275 
                          
Franklin Green Franklin Grove,
IL
  12   333,221   5/02   9/01 �� 100%  308,576 
                           
Harbor Point II
Apts.
 Benton Township,
MI
  72   1,524,010   8/01   10/02   100%  2,295,523 
                           
Hollywood Palms Apts. San Diego,
CA
  94   7,271,648   3/02   11/02   100%  1,895,913 
                           
Marina Woods Apts. Halfmoon,
NY
  32   1,387,733   7/01   4/02   100%  1,626,221 
                           
Marwood Senior Apts. Upper Marlboro,
MD
  155   12,697,365   7/01   8/02   100%  1,385,308 
                           
Meadowside
Apts.
 Milo,
NY
  40   1,560,395   5/01   12/01   100%  855,372 
                           
Mill Creek
Village
 Mt. Carroll,
IL
  12   370,557   5/02   9/01   100%  264,354 
                           
Northline Terrace Mentoda,
IL
  24   647,687   5/02   6/01   100%  545,986 
                           
Palisades Park Fulton,
IL
  16   482,144   5/02   9/01   100%  396,066 
                           
Red Hill Apts. I Farmerville,
LA
  32   795,072   11/01   6/01   100%  502,692 

 

Property
Name

 Location Units  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
Bienville Apts. Ringhold, LA  32  $738,347   12/01  11/01  100% $488,488 
                       
Breezewood Villas I Frederiksted, VI  12   964,652   10/01  6/02  100%  494,361 
                       
Cedar Grove Apartments Phase I Shepherdsville, KY  36   1,003,980    5/02   7/01  100%  424,955 
                       
Cranberry Cove Apartments Beckley, WV  28   956,899    5/02   1/02  100%  514,844 
                       
Dawson Square Thornton, CO  36   1,589,335   7/02  12/03  100%  605,962 
                       
Forest Glen Village Vidalia, GA  46   1,251,817   4/03  2/95  100%  21,275 
                       
Franklin Green Franklin Grove, IL  12   325,539   5/02  9/01  100%  308,576 
                       
Harbor Point II Apts. Benton Township, MI  72   1,497,397    8/01   10/02  100%  2,295,523 
                       
Hollywood Palms Apts. San Diego, CA  94   7,113,112   3/02  11/02  100%  1,895,913 
                       
Marina Woods Apts. Halfmoon, NY  32   1,387,733   7/01  4/02  100%  1,626,221 
                       
Marwood Senior Apts. Upper Marlboro, MD  155   12,521,424    7/01   8/02  100%  1,385,308 
                       
Meadowside Apts. Milo, NY  40   1,557,388   5/01  12/01  100%  855,372 
                       
Mill Creek Village Mt. Carroll, IL  12   364,249   5/02  9/01  100%  264,354 
                       
Northline Terrace Mentoda, IL  24   636,444   5/02  6/01  100%  545,986 
                       
Palisades Park Fulton, IL  16   472,312   5/02  9/01  100%  396,066 
                       
Red Hill Apts. I Farmerville, LA  32   786,441   11/01  6/01  100%  502,692 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 41

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Continued

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                   
Sandalwood Apartments Toppenish,
WA
  20  $968,364   5/02   7/01   100% $293,983  Toppenish, WA  20  $963,405   5/02  7/01  100% $293,983 
                                                
Southpark
Apts. II
 Newton,
KS
  60   1,479,731   9/01   5/02   100%  2,117,956  Newton, KS  60   1,460,598   9/01  5/02  100%  2,117,956 
                                                
Springfield Crossing Springfield,
VA
  347   25,289,821   6/02   10/01   100%  878,352  Springfield, VA  347   24,980,759   6/02  10/01  100%  878,352 
                                                
Sunshine Village Apts. Elizabethtown,
KY
  32   772,818   3/02   8/02   100%  1,277,070  Elizabethtown, KY  32   755,972    3/02   8/02  100%  1,277,070 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 42

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
 
                      
Bellamy Mills Apartments Dover,
NH
  30  $1,375,544   4/02   12/02   100% $2,888,317 
                           
Breezewood Villas II Frederiksted,
VI
  12   963,908   4/02   3/03   100%  505,416 
                           
Canon
Club
 Canon City,
CO
  46   716,647   7/02   12/03   100%  511,573 
                           
Chester Townhouses Phase II Chester,
SC
  52   1,952,408   4/06   12/06   100%  421,158 
                           
Clifton Family Housing Clifton,
CO
  51   1,930,992   7/02   

12/03

   100%  924,532 
                           
Cooper’s Crossing Apartments  
Los Colinas,
TX
  93   2,902,266   

4/03

   

12/95

   100%  87,199 
                           
Dorchester Apartments Port Huron,
MI
  131   4,342,384   4/02   8/03   100%  2,578,034 
                           
Harbor Pointe Apartments II Benton Township,
MI
  72   1,524,010   4/02   10/02   100%  1,731,786 
                           
Helios Station Lafayette,
CO
  30   2,291,514   7/02   12/03   100%  583,895 
                           
Hillridge Apartments Los Lunas,
NM
  38   215,000   

4/03

   

6/96

   100%  112,211 
                           
Hollywood Palm Apartments San Diego,
CA
  94   7,271,648   8/02   11/02   100%  1,283,388 
                           
Lynnelle Landing Apts. Charleston,
WV
  56   1,272,396   3/02   9/02   100%  2,009,976 
                           
Marwood Senior Apartments Upper Marlboro,
MD
  67   12,697,408   

09/04

   

8/02

   100%  160,174 

 

Property
Name

 Location Units  

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

  

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                   
Bellamy Mills Apartments  Dover, NH  30  $1,337,803    4/02   12/02  100% $2,888,317 
                       
Breezewood Villas II Frederiksted, VI  12   958,408   4/02  3/03  100%  505,416 
                       
Canon
Club
 Canon City, CO  46   700,573   7/02  12/03  100%  511,573 
                       
Chester Townhouses Phase II Chester, SC  52   1,937,535    4/06   12/06  100%  421,158 
                       
Clifton Family Housing Clifton, CO  51   1,887,384    7/02   12/03  100%  924,532 
                       
Dorchester Apartments Port Huron, MI  131   4,282,179   4/02  8/03  100%  2,578,034 
                       
Harbor Pointe Apartments II Benton Township, MI  72   1,497,397     4/02    10/02  100%  1,731,786 
                       
Helios Station Lafayette, CO  30   2,240,115   7/02  12/03  100%  583,895 
                       
Hillridge Apartments Los Lunas, NM  38   215,000   4/03  6/96  100%  112,211 
                       
Hollywood Palm Apartments San Diego, CA  94   7,113,112    8/02   11/02  100%  1,283,388 
                       
Lynnelle Landing Apts. Charleston, WV  56   1,245,397    3/02   9/02  100%  2,009,976 
                       
Marwood Senior Apartments Upper Marlboro, MD  67   12,521,424    09/04   8/02  100%  160,174 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 42

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Continued

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                   
Natchez Place Apartments Natchez,
MS
  32  $790,577   8/02   11/01   100% $554,881  Natchez, MS  32  $780,307    8/02   11/01  100% $554,881 
                                                
Northfield Housing, LP Jackson,
MS
  5   121,419   

4/03

   

12/96

   100%  24,330  Jackson, MS  5   111,930   4/03  12/96  100%  24,330 
                                                
Park Meadow Apartments Gaylord,
MI
  80   1,442,735   

4/03

   

4/97

   100%  228,511  Gaylord, MI  80   1,397,814   4/03  4/97  100%  228,511 
                                                
Park Plaza IV West Memphis,
AR
  24   583,183   6/02   10/02   100%  1,219,397  West Memphis, AR  24   556,940   6/02  10/02  100%  1,219,397 
                                                
Parkhurst Place Amherst,
NH
  42   3,389,001   1/02   9/02   100%  518,876  Amherst, NH  42   3,361,853   1/02  9/02  100%  518,876 
                                                
Strawberry Lane Apts. Clayton,
NY
  71   1,804,999   3/02   8/02   100%  672,589  Clayton, NY  71   1,758,265   3/02  8/02  100%  672,589 
                                                
Sunrise Manor Seniors. Buena Vista,
CO
  40   1,087,604   7/02   

12/03

   100%  738,573  Buena Vista, CO  40   1,032,742    7/02   12/03  100%  738,573 
                                                
Tiffany Square Lakewood,
CO
  52   1,859,787   7/02   12/03   100%  636,566  Lakewood, CO  52   1,739,500   7/02  12/03  100%  636,566 
                                                
Wingfield
Apartments II
 Kinder,
LA
  42   285,143   8/02   11/01   100%  1,422,373  Kinder, LA  42   272,321    8/02   11/01  100%  1,422,373 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 43

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                   
Alexander
Mill Apartments
 Lawrenceville,GA  224  $11,777,096   12/02   1/03   100% $1,854,189  Lawrenceville,GA  224  $11,589,015    12/02   1/03  100% $1,854,189 
                                                
Aspen Meadows Aurora,
CO
  100   2,790,676   9/02   12/03   100%  1,342,431  Aurora, CO  100   2,745,449   9/02  12/03  100%  1,342,431 
                                                
Ashbury Park Aurora,
CO
  44   2,191,207   9/02   12/03   100%  728,732  Aurora, CO  44   2,144,100   9/02  12/03  100%  728,732 
                                                
Bohannon Place Apts. Bowling Green,
KY
  12   239,629   5/03   10/03   100%  909,561  Bowling Green, KY  12   230,986   5/03  10/03  100%  909,561 
                                                
Carpenter
School
 Natchez,
MS
  38   1,493,728   1/03   12/03   100%  1,278,002  Natchez, MS  38   1,462,904   1/03  12/03  100%  1,278,002 
                                                
Charlevoix Apartments Charlevoix,
MI
  40   1,204,559   9/02   11/02   100%  302,357  Charlevoix, MI  40   1,190,085   9/02  11/02  100%  302,357 
                                                
Chester Townhouses Phase II Chester,
SC
  52   1,952,408   4/06   12/06   100%  226,777  Chester, SC  52   1,937,535    4/06   12/06  100%  226,777 
                                                
Cloverlane Apartments Lakeview,
MI
  24   259,289   9/02   10/02   100%  356,228  Lakeview, MI  24   215,900   9/02  10/02  100%  356,228 
                                                
Dorchester Apartments Port Huron,
MI
  131   4,342,384   9/02   8/03   100%  2,578,034  Port Huron, MI  131   4,282,179   9/02  8/03  100%  2,578,034 
                                                
Geneva
Sr. Citizen
Apts.
 Geneva,
NY
  32   1,398,594   4/03   12/03   100%  2,035,378  Geneva, NY  32   1,398,594    4/03   12/03  100%  2,035,378 
                                                
Gilbert Apts. Corbin,
KY
  40   723,298   7/03   5/04   100%  2,780,800  Corbin, KY  40   700,659   7/03  5/04  100%  2,780,800 
                                                
Hollywood Palm Apartments San Diego,
CA
  94   7,271,648   12/02   11/02   100%  2,654,279  San Diego, CA  94   7,113,112    12/02   11/02  100%  2,654,279 
                                                
Kearney Plaza Commerce City,
CO
  51   1,387,981   9/02   12/03   100%  575,398  Commerce City, CO  51   1,355,545   9/02  12/03  100%  575,398 
                                                
Lakewood Apartments Saranac,
MI
  24   804,198   9/02   10/02   100%  475,606  Saranac, MI  24   795,059   9/02  10/02  100%  475,606 
                                                
The Landing
Apts.
 Whitley,
KY
  24   1,226,150   4/03   6/04   100%  302,763  Whitley, KY  24   1,224,972   4/03  6/04  100%  302,763 
                                                
Library
Square Apts.
 Mandan,
ND
  46   2,034,611   9/03   8/03   100%  2,752,868  Mandan, ND  46   1,999,455    9/03   8/03  100%  2,752,868 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 43

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Continued

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                   
Parkside Plaza Apartments New York,
NY
  34  $1,315,939   

1/04

   

5/01

   100% $-  New York, NY  34  $1,311,566    1/04   5/01  100% $- 
                                                
Parkside Apartments Coleman,
MI
  40   829,392   
9/02
   
12/02
   100%  832,371  Coleman, MI  40   796,366   9/02  12/02  100%  832,371 
                                                
Riverview
Apartments
 Blissfield,
MI
  32   699,407   
9/02
   
2/02
   100%  509,938  Blissfield, MI  32   687,095   9/02  2/02  100%  509,938 
                                                
Seven Points Apartments Seven Points,
TX
  36   934,524   9/02   3/03   100%  687,978  Seven Points, TX  36   917,265    9/02   3/03  100%  687,978 
                                                
Sheridan
Gardens
 Englewood,
CO
  48   1,813,561   
9/02
   
12/03
   100%  672,657  Englewood, CO  48   1,772,324   9/02  12/03  100%  672,657 
                                                
Stottville
Court Apartments
 Stockport,
NY
  28   1,102,136   

9/02
   

5/03
   100%  1,073,805  Stockport, NY  28   1,099,749    9/02   5/03  100%  1,073,805 
                                                
Strawberry
Lake Apts.
 Norway,
MI
  32   905,657   
7/03
   
12/03
   100%  763,285  Norway, MI  32   872,271   7/03  12/03  100%  763,285 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 44

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                   
Alexander
Mills Apts.
 Lawrenceville, GA  224  $11,777,096   
2/03
   
1/03
   100% $2,266,233  Lawrenceville, GA  224  $11,589,015   2/03  1/03  100% $2,266,233 
                                                
Aurora Village Sr. Aurora,
CO
  100   4,144,261   
2/03
   
3/03
   100%  1,526,951  Aurora, CO  100   4,054,094   2/03  3/03  100%  1,526,951 
                                                
Brookside Park Apts. Atlanta,
GA
  200   11,828,947   
12/03
   
3/05
   100%  137,046  Atlanta, GA  200   11,698,287   12/03  3/05  100%  137,046 
                                                
Families First II W. Memphis,
AR
  66   2,269,940   
5/03
   

 

6/04

   100%  2,005,916  W. Memphis, AR  66   2,228,194   5/03  6/04  100%  2,005,916 
                                                
Memphis
102
 Memphis,
TN
  102   1,769,169   
5/03
   

 

8/04

   100%  3,497,653  Memphis, TN  102   1,758,116   5/03  8/04  100%  3,497,653 
                                                
Northrock
Apts. III
 Topeka,
KS
  32   921,937   
6/03
   
11/03
   100%  1,565,194  Topeka, KS  32   900,979   6/03  11/03  100%  1,565,194 
                                                
Orchard
Manor Apts.**
 Ukiah,
CA
  64   6,778,616   

10/03
   

9/03
   100%  2,231,125  Ukiah, CA  64   6,695,338    10/03   9/03  100%  2,231,125 
                                                
Orchard River Apts.** Ukiah,
CA
  48  **   10/03   7/03  100%  **  Ukiah, CA  48   **    10/03   7/03  100%  ** 
                                                
Oxford
Manor Apts.
 New Oxford,
PA
  32   1,290,186   
3/03
   
5/03
   100%  454,862  New Oxford, PA  32   1,276,663    3/03   5/03  100%  454,862 
                                                
Post Oak East Apts. Fort Worth,
TX
  246   13,456,998   
7/04
   
5/06
   100%  3,874,783  Fort Worth, TX  246   13,317,234   7/04  5/06  100%  3,874,783 
                                                
River Gardens Apts.** Fort Bragg,
CA
  48  **   10/03   11/03  100%  **  Fort Bragg, CA  48   **    10/03   11/03  100%  ** 
                                                
Villages at
Aspen Club
 Bealton,
VA
  30   1,811,100   
4/03
   
10/03
   100%  1,568,815  Bealton, VA  30   1,779,753   4/03  10/03  100%  1,568,815 

 

**3 properties which make up one Operating Partnership named Orchard River Associates LP with 160 units. Entire mortgage balance and capital contributions paid reported with Orchard Manor Apts.

** 3 properties which make up one Operating Partnership named Orchard River Associates LP with 160 units. Entire mortgage balance and capital contributions paid reported with Orchard Manor Apts.

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 45

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                   
Baldwin Villas Apts. Pontiac,
MI
  65  $4,741,361   
12/03
   

 

6/01

   100% $106,137  Pontiac, MI  65  $4,839,032   12/03  6/01  100% $106,137 
                                                
Bartlett Bayou Pascagoula,
MS
  48   859,278   

 

7/03

   

 

9/05

   100%  2,675,101  Pascagoula, MS  48   847,364   7/03  9/05  100%  2,675,101 
                                                
Breezewood Villas II Frederiksted, VI  12   963,908   

 

12/03

   

 

3/03

   100%  53,729  Frederiksted, VI  12   958,408   12/03  3/03  100%  53,729 
                                                
Brookside Park Atlanta,
GA
  200   11,828,947   

 

12/03

   
3/05
   100%  3,666,890  Atlanta, GA  200   11,698,287   12/03  3/05  100%  3,666,890 
                                                
Brookside Square Boykins,
VA
  32   1,246,371   
7/03
   

 

8/04

   100%  743,039  Boykins, VA  32   1,229,508   7/03  8/04  100%  743,039 
                                                
Chevy Place
Hallman Court
 Rochester,
NY
  77   8,181,331   

12/03

  


7/00

   100%  81,177  Rochester, NY  77   8,047,190    12/03   7/00  100%  81,177 
                                                
Dawn Springs Villa London,
KY
  24   518,936   
5/05
   
10/05
   100%  1,099,086  London, KY  24   502,402   5/05  10/05  100%  1,099,086 
                                                
Eastview Family Watonga,
OK
  16   625,624   

 

9/04

   

 

6/04

   100%  187,429  Watonga, OK  16   622,604   9/04  6/04  100%  187,429 
                                                
Fairview Manor Childress,
TX
  48   768,346   

 

5/03

   
3/04
   100%  859,892  Childress, TX  48   751,311   5/03  3/04  100%  859,892 
                                                
Harbor Pt. II Apts. Benton Township, MI  72   1,524,010   
12/03
   
10/02
   100%  201,369  Benton Township, MI  72   1,497,397   12/03  10/02  100%  201,369 
                                                
Heritage Christian Home III Brighton,
NY
  12   364,358   

1/04

   

10/03

   100%  721,545  Brighton, NY  12   324,096    1/04   10/03  100%  721,545 
                                                
Jefferson House Lynchburg,
VA
  101   2,380,646   

 

12/04

   

 

7/05

   100%  925,273  Lynchburg, VA  101   2,229,466   12/04  7/05  100%  925,273 
                                                
Kings Pt.
Apts.
 Sheridan,
CO
  50   2,199,010   
8/03
   
12/03
   100%  788,729  Sheridan, CO  50   2,147,037   8/03  12/03  100%  788,729 
                                                
La Mirage Apts. Borger,
TX
  12   835,449   

 

8/03

   
10/03
   100%  766,945  Borger, TX  12   811,267   8/03  10/03  100%  766,945 
                                                
Lakeview
Station
 Shepardsville,
KY
  28   676,938   
7/03
   
9/03
   100%  1,402,270  Shepardsville, KY  28   653,901   7/03  9/03  100%  1,402,270 
                                                
Lawrence-ville Manor Lawrenceville,
VA
  24   892,420   

 

7/03

   

 

8/04

   100%  771,671  Lawrenceville, VA  24   879,103   7/03  8/04  100%  771,671 
                                                
Lincoln Apts. Shinnston,
WV
  32   794,093   

 

10/03

   

 

12/03

   100%  786,619  Shinnston, WV  32   744,848   10/03  12/03  100%  786,619 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 45

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 

Continued

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
 Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
  Location Units 

Mortgage

Balance as

of 12/31/12

 Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 

Qualified

Occupancy

3/31/13

 

Cap Con

paid thru

3/31/13

 
                                   
London Village London,
KY
  32  $576,052   
4/05
   
9/05
   100% $2,021,436  London, KY  32  $557,501  4/05 9/05  100% $2,021,436 
                                                
Lone Terrace Lone Grove,
OK
  32   1,234,410   

 

5/03

   

 

1/04

   100%  435,193  Lone Grove, OK  32   1,226,339  5/03 1/04  100%  435,193 
                                                
Lorie Village Bowling Green,
KY
  32   859,462   

 

7/03

   

 

11/03

   100%  1,288,510  Bowling Green, KY  32   841,243  7/03 11/03  100%  1,288,510 
                                                
Marina Woods Apts. Halfmoon,
NY
  32   1,387,733   

 

12/03

   

 

4/02

   100%  4,435  Halfmoon, NY  32   1,387,733  12/03 4/02  100%  4,435 
                                                
Mill Race
Apts.
 Plainwell,
MI
  32   968,386   

 

6/03

   

 

12/03

   100%  347,253  Plainwell, MI  32   951,367  6/03 12/03  100%  347,253 
                                                
Orchard View Apst. Farmington,
MO
  40   785,065   
7/03
   

 

6/04

   100%  2,226,954  Farmington, MO  40   754,178  7/03 6/04  100%  2,226,954 
                                                
Reese Village Emporia,
VA
  40   1,386,232   

 

3/05

   

 

11/04

   100%  1,198,088  Emporia, VA  40   1,379,108  3/05 11/04  100%  1,198,088 
                                                
Ridge Crest
Apts.
 St. Louis,
MO
  83   3,413,858   

 

8/03

   

 

9/04

   100%  2,020,327  St. Louis, MO  83   3,343,646  8/03 9/04  100%  2,020,327 
                                                
Sulphur Terrace Sulphur,
OK
  32   1,207,572   

 

5/03

   

 

1/04

   100%  433,759  Sulphur, OK  32   1,199,658  5/03 1/04  100%  433,759 
                                                
University
Plaza Sr. Complex
 Greely,
CO
  34   1,050,586   

5/03

   

9/03

   100%  332,128  Greely, CO  34   1,029,129  5/03 9/03  100%  332,128 
                                                
Valleyview
Apts.
 Canneyville,
KY
  24   697,002   
12/05
   
12/04
   100%  488,540  Canneyville, KY  24   691,862  12/05 12/04  100%  488,540 
                                                
William B.
Quarton
 Cedar Rapids, IA  28   1,242,379   
1/04
   
7/03
   100%  1,197,000  Cedar Rapids, IA  28   1,285,499  1/04 7/03  100%  1,197,000 
                                                
Willow Oak and Oroville Apartments  
Willows,
CA
  122   4,305,778   

 

 

07/04

   

 

 

10/03

   100%  1,619,212  Willows, CA  122   4,249,497  07/04 10/03  100%  1,619,212 

Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. - Series 46

 

PROPERTY PROFILE AS OF MARCH 31, 20122013

 


Property
Name
 Location  Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/11
  Acq
Date
  Const
Comp
  Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/12
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/12
 
                     
Bartlett Bayou Apartments Pascagoula,
MS
  48  $859,278   

7/03

   

9/05

   100% $786,153 
                           
Clayton Station Apartments Munfordville,
KY
  29   744,701   

4/04

   

9/04

   100%  1,274,486 
                           
Deer Meadow Apartments Tishomingo, OK  24   1,123,891   

 

2/04

   

 

3/04

   100%  369,626 
                           
Elma Gardens Elma, WA  36   1,203,653   3/05   1/04   100%  588,701 
                           
Jacksonville Square Apts. Jacksonville,
TX
  44   1,073,192   

 

11/03

   

 

7/04

   100%  621,519 
                           
Kensington
Heights
Apts.
 Kansas City,
MO
  126   4,559,055   

10/03

   

10/04

   100%  2,375,770 
                           
Kimberly Place Apartments Danbury,
CT
  117   6,789,181   

6/04

   

4/05

   100%  2,450,732 
                           
Linden's
Apartments
 Shawnee,
OK
  54   1,124,190   
12/04
   
2/06
   100%  2,963,132 
                           
Ocean East Housing Portland,
ME
  32   1,460,334   

 

2/04

   

 

6/05

   100%  3,787,273 
                           
Panola
Apts.
 Carthage,
TX
  32   754,046   

 

12/03

   

 

4/04

   100%  461,573 
                           
Rosehill
Apts.
 Topeka,
KS
  48   2,422,115   

 

12/03

   

 

9/04

   100%  2,540,503 
                           
Sandy Hill Apartments Greenville, KY  29   511,580   

 

4/04

   

 

10/04

   100%  1,849,164 
                           
Saint Martin
Apartments
 McCombs,
MS
  40   850,066   
8/05
   

 

4/06

   100%  1,539,454 
                           
Tanglewood Village Apartments Panama,
OK
  24   1,159,433   

 

 

9/04

   

 

 

5/04

   100%  402,649 
                           
Wagoner
Village
 Wagoner,
OK
  31   962,752   

 

1/04

   

 

1/04

   100%  341,377 

Property
Name
 Location Units  Mortgage
Balance as
of 12/31/12
  Acq
Date
 Const
Comp
 Qualified
Occupancy
3/31/13
  Cap Con
paid thru
3/31/13
 
                   
Bartlett Bayou Apartments Pascagoula, MS  48  $847,364  7/03  9/05  100% $786,153 
                       
Clayton Station Apartments Munfordville, KY  29   732,157  4/04 9/04  100%  1,274,486 
                       
Deer Meadow Apartments Tishomingo, OK  24   1,115,361  2/04  
3/04
  100%  369,626 
                       
Elma Gardens Elma, WA  36   1,189,934  3/05 1/04  100%  588,701 
                       
Jacksonville Square Apts. Jacksonville, TX  44   1,062,250   11/03  
7/04
  100%  621,519 
                       
Kensington Heights Apts. Kansas City, MO  126   4,497,039   10/03  10/04  100%  2,375,770 
                       
Kimberly Place Apartments Danbury, CT  117   6,572,047   6/04  4/05  100%  2,450,732 
                       
Linden's Apartments Shawnee, OK  54   1,110,259   
12/04
  
2/06
  100%  2,963,132 
                       
Ocean East Housing Portland, ME  32   1,447,582   
2/04
  
6/05
  100%  3,787,273 
                       
Panola  Apts. Carthage, TX  32   742,934   
12/03
  
4/04
  100%  461,573 
                       
Rosehill  Apts. Topeka, KS  48   2,401,486   
12/03
  
9/04
  100%  2,540,503 
                       
Sandy Hill Apartments Greenville, KY  29   494,344  4/04  10/04  100%  1,849,164 
                       
Saint Martin Apartments McCombs, MS  40   809,319  8/05 4/06  100%  1,539,454 
                       
Tanglewood Village Apartments Panama, OK  24   1,152,424   9/04  5/04  100%  402,649 
                       
Wagoner Village Wagoner, OK  31   957,420   1/04  1/04  100%  341,377 
Item 3.Legal Proceedings

None.

None.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable

 

Not Applicable

PART II

Item 5.Market for the Fund's Limited Partnership Interests and Related PartnershipPartner Matters and Issuer Purchases of Partnership Interests

 

(a)

Market Information

The Fund is classified as a limited partnership and does not have common stock. There is no established public trading market for the BACs and it is not anticipated that any public market will develop.

 

(b)

Approximate number of security holders

As of March 31, 2013, the Fund has 42,215 BAC holders for an aggregate of 83,651,080 BACs, at a subscription price of $10 per BAC, received and accepted.

As of March 31, 2012, the Fund has 42,831 BAC holders for an aggregate of 83,651,080 BACs, at a subscription price of $10 per BAC, received and accepted.

 

The BACs were issued in series. Series 20 consists of 2,336 2,276

investors holding 3,866,700 BACs, Series 21 consists of 1,171 1,153

investors holding 1,892,700 BACs, Series 22 consists of 1,632 1,614

investors holding 2,564,400 BACs, Series 23 consists of 2,108 2,106

investors holding 3,336,727 BACs, Series 24 consists of 1,294 1,283

investors holding 2,169,878 BACs, Series 25 consists of 1,774 1,741

investors holding 3,026,109 BACs, Series 26 consists of 2,294 2,283

investors holding 3,995,900 BACs, Series 27 consists of 1,326 1,314

investors holding 2,460,700 BACs, Series 28 consists of 2,022 2,013

investors holding 4,000,738 BACs, Series 29 consists of 2,235 2,209

investors holding 3,991,800 BACs, Series 30 consists of 1,340 1,326

investors holding 2,651,000 BACs, Series 31 consists of 2,072 2,036

investors holding 4,417,857 BACs, Series 32 consists of 2,279 2,229

investors holding 4,754,198 BACs, Series 33 consists of 1,254 1,218

investors holding 2,636,533 BACs, Series 34 consists of 1,698 1,681

investors holding 3,529,319 BACs, Series 35 consists of 1,668 1,656

investors holding 3,300,463 BACs, Series 36 consists of 1,013 1,112

investors holding 2,106,837 BACs, Series 37 consists of 1,135 1,114

investors holding 2,512,500 BACs, Series 38 consists of 1,199 1,164

investors holding 2,543,100 BACs, Series 39 consists of 995 978

investors holding 2,292,152 BACs, Series 40 consists of 1,108 1,084

investors holding 2,630,256 BACs, Series 41 consists of 1,404 1,346

investors holding 2,891,626 BACs, Series 42 consists of 1,245 1,201

investors holding 2,744,262 BACs, Series 43 consists of 1,671 1,622

investors holding 3,637,987 BACs, Series 44 consists of 1,292 1,268

investors holding 2,701,973 BACs, Series 45 consists of 1,8331,792 investors holding 4,014,367 BACS and Series 46 consists of 1,4331,396 investors holding 2,980,998 BACS at March 31, 20122013

 

(c)

Dividend history and restriction

The Fund has made no distributions of net cash flow to its BAC holders from its inception, October 5, 1993, through March 31, 2013.

The Fund has made no distributions of net cash flow to its BAC holders from its inception, October 5, 1993, through March 31, 2012.

 

The Fund Agreement provides that profits, losses and credits will be allocated each month to the holder of record of a BAC as of the last day of such month. Allocation of profits, losses and credits among BAC holders are made in proportion to the number of BACs held by each BAC holder.

Any distributions of net cash flow or liquidation, sale or refinancing proceeds will be made within 180 days of the end of the annual period to which they relate. Distributions will be made to the holders of record of a BAC as of the last day of each month in the ratio which (i) the BACs held by the holder on the last day of the calendar month bears to (ii) the aggregate number of BACs outstanding on the last day of such month.

 

During the year ended March 31, 1999, the Fund made a return of equity distribution to the Series 27 limited partners in the amount of $275,000. The distribution was the result of certain Operating Partnerships not achieving their projected tax credits.

 

During the year ended March 31, 2000 the Fund made a return of equity distribution to the Series 29 limited partners in the amount of $238,040. The distribution was the result of certain Operating Partnerships not achieving their projected tax credits.

 

During the year ended March 31, 2006 the Fund made a return of equity distribution to Series 20 limited partners in the amount of $371,349. The distribution was the result of proceeds available from the sale of one Operating Partnership.

 

During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Fund made a return of equity distribution to the Series 20 and Series 41 limited partners in the amount of $1,860,003 and $138,998, respectively. The distributions were the result of proceeds available from the refinancing of one Operating Partnership.

  

Item 6.Selected Financial Data

 

Not Applicable.

Applicable.

Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements including our intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations, strategies and predictions of our future activities, or other future events or conditions. These statements are "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1993, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by these acts. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainty, including, for example, the factors identified in Part I, Item 1A of this Report. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying these forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in these forward-looking statements, the inclusion of this information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved.

 

Liquidity

 

The Fund's primary source of funds iswas the proceeds of eachits Public Offering.  Other sources of liquidity include (i) interest earned on capital contributions held pending investment or on working capital reserves, and (ii) cash distributions from operations of the Operating Partnerships in which the Fund has invested and will invest. All(iii) proceeds received from the dispositions of the Operating Partnerships that are returned to fund reserves.  These sources of liquidity, along with the Fund’s working capital reserve, are available to meet the obligations of the Fund.Partnership.  The Fund does not anticipate significant cash distributions in the long or short term from operations of the Operating Partnerships.

Capital Resources

 

The Fund offered BACs in the Offering originally declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 1993. The Fund received and accepted subscriptions for $836,177,880 representing 83,651,080 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 20 through 46 of the Fund. On December 19, 2003, the Fund concluded its public offering of BACs.

 

(Series 20). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 20 on January 21, 1994. The Fund received and accepted subscriptions for $38,667,000 representing 3,866,700 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 20. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 20 were completed and the last of the BACs in Series 20 were issued by the Fund on June 24, 1994.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 20 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. Proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 20 had been used to invest in 24 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $27,693,970. As of March 31, 2012, 122013, 13 of the properties have been disposed of and 1211 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to all of the Operating Partnerships.

 

(Series 21). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 21 on July 5, 1994. The Fund received and accepted subscriptions for $18,927,000 representing 1,892,700 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 21. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 21 were completed and the last of the BACs in Series 21 were issued by the Fund on September 30, 1994.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 21 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 21 had been used to invest in 14 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $13,872,728. As of March 31, 2012, 82013, 9 of the properties has been disposed of and 65 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to all of the Operating Partnerships.

 

(Series 22). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 22 on October 12, 1994. The Fund received and accepted subscriptions for $25,644,000 representing 2,564,400 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 22. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 22 were completed and the last of the BACs in Series 22 were issued by the Fund on December 28, 1994.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 22 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 22 had been used to invest in 29 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $18,758,748 and the Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 27 of the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012, 92013, 19 of the properties have been disposed of and 2010 remain. Series 20 has outstanding contributions payable to 2 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $9,352 as of March 31, 2012.2013. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.

(Series 23). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 23 on January 10, 1995. The Fund received and accepted subscriptions for $33,366,000 representing 3,336,727 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 23. Offers and Sales of BACs in Series 23 were completed and the last of the BACs in Series 23 were issued by the Fund on June 23, 1995.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 23 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 23 had been used to invest in 22 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $24,352,278. As of March 31, 2012, 72013, 11 of the properties have been disposed of and 1511 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to all of the Operating Partnerships.

 

(Series 24). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 24 on June 9, 1995. The Fund received and accepted subscriptions for $21,697,000 representing 2,169,878 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 24. Offers and Sales of BACs in Series 24 were completed and the last of the BACs in Series 24 were issued by the Fund on September 22, 1995.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, none2013, $9,999 of Series 24 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 24 had been used to invest in 24 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $15,796,309$15,796,309. As of March 31, 2013, 11 of the properties have been disposed of and the13 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 23all of the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012, 6 of the properties have been disposed of and 18 remain. Series 24 has outstanding contributions payable to 1 Operating Partnership in the amount of $9,999 as of March 31, 2012. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnership has achieved the conditions set forth in its partnership agreement.

 

(Series 25). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 25 on September 30, 1995. The Fund received and accepted subscriptions for $30,248,000 representing 3,026,109 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 25. Offers and Sales of BACs in Series 25 were completed and the last of the BACs in Series 25 were issued by the Fund on December 29, 1995.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, $10,0012013, none of Series 25 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 25 had been used to invest in 22 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $22,324,539. As of March 31, 2012, 112013, 15 of the properties have been disposed of and 117 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to all of the Operating Partnerships.

 

(Series 26). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 26 on January 18, 1996. The Fund received and accepted $39,959,000 representing 3,995,900 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 26. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 26 were completed and the last of the BACS in Series 26 were issued by the Fund on June 14, 1996.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, none2013, $13,197 of Series 26 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 26 had been used to invest in 45 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $29,401,215 and the Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 43 of the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012, 62013, 14 of the properties have been disposed of and 3931 remain. Series 26 has outstanding contributions payable to 2 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $14,490,$1,293, as of March 31, 2012.2013. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.

 

(Series 27). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 27 on June 17, 1996. The Fund received and accepted $24,607,000 representing 2,460,700 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 27. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 27 were completed and the last of the BACS in Series 27 were issued by the Fund on September 27, 1996.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 27 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 27 had been used to invest in 16 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $17,881,574 and the Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 14 of the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012, 12013, 3 of the properties have been disposed of and 1513 remain. Series 27 has outstanding contributions payable to 2 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $10,020 as of March 31, 2012.2013. Of the amount outstanding, $6,500 has been advanced to one of the Operating Partnerships. The advance will be converted to capital and the remaining contributions of $3,520 will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.

 

(Series 28). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 28 on September 30, 1996. The Fund received and accepted $39,999,000 representing 4,000,738 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 28. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 28 were completed and the last of the BACS in Series 28 were issued by the Fund on January 31, 1997.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 28 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 28 had been used to invest in 26 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $29,281,983. As of March 31, 2012, 22013, 6 of the properties have been disposed of and 2420 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 23 of the Operating Partnerships. Series 28 has outstanding contributions payable to 3 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $40,968 as of March 31, 2012.2013. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.

 

(Series 29). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 29 on February 10, 1997. The Fund received and accepted $39,918,000 representing 3,991,800 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 29. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 29 were completed on June 20, 1997.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 29 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 29 had been used to invest in 22 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $29,137,877. As of March 31, 2012,2013, 1 of the properties has been disposed of and 21 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 19 of the Operating Partnerships. Series 29 has outstanding contributions payable to 3 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $10,197 as of March 31, 2012.2013. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.

 

(Series 30). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 30 on June 23, 1997. The Fund received and accepted $26,490,750 representing 2,651,000 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 30. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 30 were completed on September 10, 1997.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 30 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. Proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 30 had been used to invest in 20 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $19,497,869. As of March 31, 2012, 32013, 4 of the properties have been disposed of and 1716 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 16 of the Operating Partnerships. Series 30 has outstanding contributions payable to 4 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $127,396 as of March 31, 2012.2013. The remaining contributions will be released when Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.

 

(Series 31). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 31 on September 11, 1997. The Fund had received and accepted $44,057,750 representing 4,417,857 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 31. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 31 were completed on January 18, 1998.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 31 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnership. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 31 had been used to invest in 27 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $32,569,100. As of March 31, 2012, 12013, 2 of the properties has been disposed of and 2625 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 23 of the Operating Partnerships. Series 31 has outstanding contributions payable to 4 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $66,294 as of March 31, 2012.2013. Of the amount outstanding, $25,000 has been funded into an escrow account on behalf of another Operating Partnership. The escrowed funds will be converted to capital and the remaining contributions of $41,294 will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.

 

(Series 32). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 32 on January 19, 1998. The Fund had received and accepted $47,431,000 representing 4,754,198 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 32. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 32 were completed on June 23, 1998.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 32 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnership. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 32 had been used to invest in 17 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $34,129,677. As of March 31, 2012,2013, 2 of the properties have been disposed of and 15 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 14 of the Operating Partnerships. Series 32 has outstanding contributions payable to 3 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $173,561 as of March 31, 2012.2013. Of the amount outstanding,

$46,908 $46,908 has been loaned to one of the Operating Partnerships. The loan will be converted to capital and the remaining contributions of $126,653 will be released when Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999, the Fund had purchased assignments in Bradley Phase I of Massachusetts LLC, Bradley Phase II of Massachusetts LLC, Byam Village of Massachusetts LLC, Hanover Towers of Massachusetts LLC, Harbor Towers of Massachusetts LLC and Maple Hill of Massachusetts LLC. Under the terms of the Assignments of Membership Interests dated December 1, 1998 the series is entitled to certain profits, losses, tax credits, cash flow, proceeds from capital transactions and capital account as defined in the individual Operating Partnership Agreements. The Fund utilized $1,092,847 of Series 32 net offering proceeds to invest in Operating Partnerships for this investment.

 

(Series 33). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 33 on June 22, 1998. The Fund received and accepted $26,362,000 representing 2,636,533 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 33. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 33 were completed on September 21, 1998.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 33 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 33 had been used to invest in 10 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $19,594,100 and the Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 8 of the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, 2 of the properties have been disposed of and 8 remain. Series 33 has outstanding contributions payable to 2 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $69,154 as of March 31, 2012.2013. The remaining contributions of will be released when Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.

 

(Series 34). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 34 on September 22, 1998. The Fund had received and accepted $35,273,000 representing 3,529,319 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 34. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 34 were completed on February 11, 1999.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 34 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 34 had been used to invest in 14 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $25,738,978$25,738,978. As of March 31, 2013, 1 of the properties have been disposed of and the13 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to all of the Operating Partnerships.

 

(Series 35). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 35 on February 22, 1999. The Fund received and accepted $33,002,000 representing 3,300,463 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 35. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 35 were completed on June 28, 1999.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 35 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 35 had been used to invest in 11 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $24,002,391$24,002,391. As of March 31, 2013, 1 of the properties have been disposed of and the10 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to all of the Operating Partnerships.

(Series 36). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 36 on June 22, 1999. The Fund received and accepted $21,068,375 representing 2,106,837 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 36. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 36 were completed on September 28, 1999.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 36 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 36 had been used to invest in 11 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $15,277,041,$15,277,041. As of March 31, 2013, 2 of the properties have been disposed of and the9 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to all of the Operating Partnerships.

(Series 37). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 37 on October 29, 1999. The Fund received and accepted $25,125,000 representing 2,512,500 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 37. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 37 were completed on January 28, 2000.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 37 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 37 had been used to invest in 7 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $18,735,142 and the Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 6 of the Operating Partnerships. Series 37 has outstanding contributions payable to 1 Operating Partnership in the amount of $138,438 as of March 31, 2012.2013. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnership has achieved the conditions set forth in its partnership agreement.

(Series 38). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 38 on February 1, 2000. The Fund received and accepted $25,431,000 representing 2,543,100 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 38. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 38 were completed on July 31, 2000.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 38 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 38 had been used to invest in 10 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $18,612,287 and the Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, the Fund used $420,296 of Series 38 net offering proceeds to acquire a limited partnership equity interest in a limited liability company, which is the general partner of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes. The series is entitled to a percentage of the profits, losses and tax credits of the limited liability company. The investment is reported in the Investment in Operating Limited Partnerships line item on the balance sheet.

 

(Series 39). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 39 on August 1, 2000. The Fund received and accepted $22,921,000 representing 2,292,152 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 39. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 39 were completed on January 31, 2001.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 39 net offering proceeds to were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnership. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 39 had been used to invest in 9 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $17,115,492, and the Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to all of the Operating Partnerships.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, the Fund used $192,987 of Series 39 net offering proceeds to acquire a limited partnership equity interest in a limited liability company, which is the general partner of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes. The series is entitled to a percentage of the profits, losses and tax credits of the limited liability company. The investment is reported in the Investment in Operating Limited Partnerships line item on the balance sheet.

 

(Series 40). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 40 on February 1, 2001. The Fund received and accepted $26,269,250 representing 2,630,256 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 40. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 40 were completed on July 31, 2001.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 40 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 40 had been used to invest in 16 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $19,030,772, and the Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 15 of the Operating Partnerships. Series 40 has outstanding contributions payable to 1 Operating Partnership in the amount of $102 as of March 31, 2012.2013. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnership has achieved the conditions set forth in its partnership agreement.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, the Fund used $578,755 of Series 40 net offering proceeds to acquire 5 limited partnership equity interests in limited liability companies, which are the general partners of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes. The series is entitled to a percentage of the profits, losses and tax credits of the limited liability companies. The investment is reported in the Investment in Operating Limited Partnerships line item on the balance sheet.

 

(Series 41). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 41 on August 1, 2001. The Fund received and accepted $28,916,260 representing 2,891,626 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 41. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 41 were completed on January 31, 2002.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 41 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. Proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 41 had been used to invest in 23 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $21,278,631. As of March 31, 2012,2013, 3 of the properties have been disposed of and 20 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 22 Operating Partnerships. Series 41 has outstanding contributions payable to 1 Operating Partnership in the amount of $100 as of March 31, 2012.2013. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnership has achieved the conditions set forth in its partnership agreement.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, the Fund used $195,249 of Series 41 net offering proceeds to acquire a limited partnership equity interest in a limited liability company, which is the general partner of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes. The series is entitled to a percentage of the profits, losses and tax credits of the limited liability company. The investment is reported in the Investment in Operating Limited Partnerships line item on the balance sheet.

(Series 42). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 42 on February 1, 2002. The Fund received and accepted $27,442,620 representing 2,744,262 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 42. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 42 were completed on July 31, 2002.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 42 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 42 had been used to invest in 23 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $20,661,120, and the Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 21 Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012, 12013, 2 of the properties has been disposed of and 2221 remain. Series 42 has outstanding contributions payable to 2 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $73,433 as of March 31, 2012.2013. Of the amount outstanding, $63,676 has been advanced or loaned to the Operating Partnerships. The loans and advances will be converted to capital and the remaining contributions of $9,757 will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.


(Series 43). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 43 on August 1, 2002. The Fund received and accepted $36,379,870 representing 3,637,987 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 43. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 43 were completed on December 31, 2002.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 43 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 43 had been used to invest in 23 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $27,400,154, and the Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 20 of the Operating Partnerships. Series 43 has outstanding contributions payable to 3 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $121,112 as of March 31, 2012.2013. Of the amount outstanding, $63,676 has been advanced or loaned to the Operating Partnerships. The loans and advances will be converted to capital and the remaining contributions of $57,436 will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, the Fund used $268,451 of Series 43 net offering proceeds to acquire 1 limited partnership equity interest in a limited liability company, which is the general partner of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, the Fund used $805,160 of Series 43 net offering proceeds to acquire 7 limited partnership equity interests in limited liability companies, which are the general partner of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes. The series is entitled to a percentage of the profits, losses and tax credits of the limited liability companies. The investments are reported in the Investment in Operating Limited Partnerships line item on the balance sheet.

(Series 44). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 44 on January 14, 2003. The Fund received and accepted $27,019,730 representing 2,701,973 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 44. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 44 were completed on April 30, 2003.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 44 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 44 had been used to invest in 10 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $20,248,519, and the Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 9 of the Operating Partnerships. Series 44 has outstanding contributions payable to 1 Operating Partnership in the amount of $254,640$252,864 as of March 31, 2012.2013. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnership has achieved the conditions set forth in its partnership agreement.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, the Fund used $164,164 of Series 44 net offering proceeds to acquire 1 limited partnership equity interest in a limited liability company, which is the general partner of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes. The series is entitled to a percentage of the profits, losses and tax credits of the limited liability company. The investment is reported in the Investment in Operating Limited Partnerships line item on the balance sheet.

 

(Series 45). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 45 on July 1, 2003. The Fund received and accepted $40,143,670 representing 4,014,367 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 45. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 45 were completed on September 16, 2003.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 45 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 45 had been used to invest in 31 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $30,232,512. As of March 31, 2012,2013, 1 of the properties has been disposed of and 30 remain. The Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 30 of the Operating Partnerships. Series 45 has outstanding contributions payable to 1 Operating Partnership in the amount of $16,724 as of March 31, 2012.2013. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnership has achieved the conditions set forth in its partnership agreement.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, the Fund used $302,862 of Series 45 net offering proceeds to acquire 1 limited partnership equity interest in limited liability company, which is the general partner of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes. The series is entitled to a percentage of the profits, losses and tax credits of the limited liability company. The investment is reported in the Investment in Operating Limited Partnerships line item on the balance sheet.

 

(Series 46). The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 46 on September 23, 2003. The Fund received and accepted $29,809,980 representing 2,980,998 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 46. Offer and sales of BACs in Series 46 were completed on December 19, 2003.

 

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012,2013, none of Series 46 net offering proceeds were used to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2012,2013, proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 46 had been used to invest in 15 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $22,495,082, and the Fund had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to all of the Operating Partnerships.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, the Fund used $228,691 of Series 46 net offering proceeds to acquire 1 limited partnership equity interest in a limited liability company, which is the general partner of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes. The series is entitled to a percentage of the profits, losses and tax credits of the limited liability company. The investment is reported in the Investment in Operating Limited Partnerships line item on the balance sheet.

 

Results of Operations

 

The Fund incurs a fund management fee to the general partner and/or its affiliates in an amount equal to 0.5% of the aggregate cost of the apartment complexes owned by the Operating Partnerships, less the amount of partnership management and reporting fees paid by the Operating Partnerships. The annual fund management fee incurred, net of fees received, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $4,523,004 and 2011 was $5,052,521, and $5,297,336, respectively.

 

The Fund's investment objectives do not include receipt of significant cash flow distributions from the Operating Partnerships in which it has invested or intends to invest. The Fund's investments in Operating Partnerships have been and will be made principally with a view towards realization of Federal Housing Tax Credits for allocation to its partners and BAC holders.

 

As funds are utilized by the individual series for payment of fund management fees, operating expenses and capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships, it is anticipated that the “cash and cash equivalents” amounts for each series will decrease. As a result of the reduction, it is expected that interest income reported by each series will begin to decrease after the first full year of operations. Occasionally the Fund will make interest-bearing loans to Operating Partnerships against contributions due for release at a later date.

 

(Series 20). As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 1211 Operating Partnerships at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

 

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the series, in total, generated $403,425$(79,430) and $672,027,$403,425, respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

 

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 20 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

 

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $709,830$(132,037) and $782,240,$709,830, respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income from Operating Partnerships, and the fund management fee.

East Douglas Apartments Limited Partnership (East Douglas Apartments) was sold through a foreclosure sale on June 30, 2010 and the title to the property was conveyed to the lender. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain or loss on the sale the property was recorded for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.

Prior to foreclosure, the investment general partner concluded that the forecasted costs to maintain the property through December 31, 2010, the end of the low income housing tax credit compliance period, would be greater than the benefits associated with maintaining tax credit compliance. With the foreclosure sale occurring prior to the December 31, 2010 expiration of the low income housing tax credit compliance period, the Operating Partnership incurred tax credit recapture and interest penalty costs of $67,474, equivalent to $17 per 1,000 BACs. The lender assigned a receiver to the property on October 1, 2009.

East Douglas had historically operated at or just below breakeven due to a combination of the low rent structure mandated by the state tax credit-monitoring agency, the Illinois Housing Development Authority, and high debt. In general, the fundamentals of the property have been deteriorating since 2006 as a result of a decrease in annual average occupancy and a decrease in net effective rents. Occupancy as of June 30, 2010 was 77%. Average occupancy for 2009 was 86% versus 82% for 2008. Due to several months of low occupancy, the property had insufficient cash to turn units and pay payroll and property management fees in early 2009. In May 2009, the investment partnership funded $16,238 to cover some payables associated with unit turn costs, as well as past due management fees and payroll. In the third quarter of 2009, the investment partnership funded an additional $23,553 to cover mold remediation costs (see below) that property operations could not support. Through the date of the foreclosure sale on June 30, 2010, the investment partnership has funded $72,178 to the Operating Partnership for operating deficits, of which $39,791 was funded in 2009; $17,112 was funded in 2007; and the remainder was funded in prior years. The property operated below breakeven in recent years through the date of the foreclosure of June 30, 2010. The Operating Partnership previously established an operating reserve, which had a balance of approximately $78,000 at the end of the second quarter 2009; however, per the loan documents, this reserve functioned as a debt service reserve, was controlled by the lender, and was only to be withdrawn from by the lender in the event of default under the loan agreement.

In May 2009, management reported mold growth in the basement of the property after several weeks of heavy rain. The water eventually dissipated, but the excessive moisture in the basement caused rapid mold growth, mostly in the storage areas and stairwell of the basement. Mold growth also spread into the laundry room used by the residents. No resident units were affected. A mold inspection was performed in June 2009 and remediation bids were received in July 2009. Remediation began in July 2009 and cost approximately $42,000, of which approximately $18,500 was paid out of operating cash. The work was completed in August 2009 and a subsequent inspection revealed that all samples were below acceptable contamination levels.

Several years ago, the operating general partner tried to improve the property’s financial performance by refinancing the mortgage, but was unsuccessful. The investment general partner had attempted to find a replacement operating general partner but was also unsuccessful.

In June 2009, the Operating Partnership stopped making debt service payments due to cash flow shortfalls. The lender issued a default notice, started the foreclosure process and appointed a receiver to run the property. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Operating Partnership met with the senior lender to discuss the status of the property. During the first quarter of 2010, the senior lender denied the Operating Partnership’s request to restructure the debt and decided to proceed toward foreclosure. On March 24, 2010, the court granted the lender a judgment of foreclosure. The 2010 tax return was the final tax return for East Douglas Apartments Limited Partnership; it was completed and filed the second quarter of 2011.

In March 2012, the investment general partner of transferred its interest in 2730 Lafferty Street Apartments to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $4,119,474 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $775,000. Of the total proceeds received, $18,750 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,500 will bewas paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $748,750 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 20. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $748,750 as of March 31, 2012.

 

Northfield Apartments, LPL.P. (Willow Point I Apartments) is a 120-unit family property located in Jackson, Mississippi. Through the first quarter of 2012, theThe property continued to operate below breakeven through the first quarter of 2013 due to low occupancy, high operating expenses and high maintenance expenses. The property endedinsufficient rental rates. Average occupancy remained unchanged at 79% in the first quarter of 2012 83% occupied. Through the first quarter of 2012, maintenance expenses remained high due in part2013. This is compared to the 2012 year end occupancy of 79% and an average of 84% in 2012. According to management, resident skips and evictions for non-payment of rent remain problematic. The tenant base has a large hourly-wage employee component and the weak job market has resulted in a continued high costreduction of hours. Additionally, management struggles to turn vacant units.stabilize occupancy because the Jackson, MS market is saturated with newer affordable units at comparable rents. Consequently, to remain competitive, rents have been adjusted downward by $193 and $167 below the maximum allowable rates on two and three bedroom units, respectively. Additionally, management is offering a special with one month free rent to new tenants. The constant tenant turnover has resulted in continuous maintenance and repair costs. In addition, the property is older and many fixtures require repair and replacement on a consistent basis, so that high maintenancebasis. Maintenance expenses are expected to negatively impact the property for the foreseeable future. Operating expenses are also adversely impacted by the high water rates charged by the water company in Jackson, MS. The investment general partner continues weeklybi-weekly communication with the operating general partner to discuss operations and occupancy concerns.

All real estate tax and insurance payments are current; however,current through March 31, 2013.

In 2010 the operating general partner has not made payment on the mortgage since the third quarter of 2010. The money has instead been used to fund turn costs for vacant units. The operating general partner had been pursuingpursued a workout plan with the first mortgage lender and stopped paying debt service in orderthe third quarter of 2010 in an attempt to motivateinduce the lender to negotiate. During the third quarter of 2011, the investment general partner conducted a site visit to inspect the physical condition of the property, analyze the local market and interview the property management team. While the management team appeared qualified for the role, the property is tired and shows signs of wear. Furthermore, the Jackson market is saturated with affordable units and the property faces competition from newer affordable communities.

On December 31, 2009, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Northfield Apartments, LP. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.

In January of 2012 the operating general partner advised the investment general partner that the lender had exercised theirits right to accelerate the mortgage. TheSince the operating general partner iswas unwilling to let this property go intoto foreclosure, and hasthe Operating Partnership filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for the Operating Partnership.on January 12, 2012. On April 6, 2012, the operating general partner submitted a reorganization plan to the bankruptcy court that includesfeatured restructuring of the secured and non-insider unsecured debt. The reorganization plan was subsequently amended on September 21, 2012 and was conditionally approved by the bankruptcy court pending approval by vote by all creditors and equity security holders. A final confirmation hearing was held on November 13, 2012 and the proposed plan was effectuated on December 21, 2012. The reorganization plan extended the loan maturity date from November 1, 2014 to November 1, 2017. In addition, all accrued interest, default interest, late fees and collection expenses have been deferred until maturity, but will not accrue any additional interest. Beginning on January 1, 2013 and continuing through the new loan maturity date, monthly interest only payments, based on the upheld 8.47% interest rate, are due and payable. At loan maturity a balloon payment equal to the current principal amount outstanding plus the aforementioned deferred amounts, approximately $2,990,623 in total, will be due. According to the operating general partner this will be addressed either through a refinancing or a potential re-syndication.

Note that the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2009 with respect to Northfield Apartments, LP. Consequently,L.P. Now that the aforementioned bankruptcy will not result in any risk of recapture costs for the investment limited partners.

In December 2006,plan has been approved, the investment general partner will re-start the process of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II – Series 14, Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III - Series 17, and Series 20 transferred 33% of their interest in College Greene Rental Associates Limited Partnership to entities affiliatedexploring various disposition strategies that would be consistent with the operating general partners for their assumption of one third of the outstanding mortgage balance. The cash proceeds received by Series 14, Series 17, and Series 20 were $25,740, $7,919, and $65,341, respectively. Of the proceeds received, $1,950, $599, and $4,951 for Series 14, Series 17, and Series 20, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds received by Series 14, Series 17, and Series 20 of $23,790, $7,320 and $60,390, respectively, were applied against the investment limited partners' investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting. In April 2010, the investment limited partner transferred 49% of its interest for $68,174, $20,977, and $173,058 for Series 14, Series 17 and Series 20, respectively. Of the proceeds received, $7,000, $3,400 and $15,000 for Series 14, Series 17 and Series 20, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer. The remaining proceeds of $61,174, $17,577 and $158,058, respectively, were returned to the cash reserves held by Series 14, Series 17 and Series 20, respectively. The proceeds were allocated to the investment limited partnerships based on their original equity investments in the Operating Partnership. The remaining investment limited partner interest was transferred on March 31, 2011. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $61,174, $17,577 and $158,058, respectively, for Series 14, Series 17, and Series 20, as of March 31, 2011.

In May 2010, the investment general partner of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III - Series 18 and Series 20, respectively, transferred their interests in Evergreen Hills Associates, Limited Partnership to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,635,694 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $29,680 and $12,720 in Series 18 and Series 20, respectively. Of the total proceeds received, $22,680 and $9,720, for Series 18 and Series 20, respectively, represents reporting fees due to an affiliateobjectives of the investment partnerships and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,000 and $3,000, for Series 18 and Series 20, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. No proceeds were returned to cash reserves held by Series 18 and Series 20, respectively. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership was recorded as of June 30, 2010.

In June 2010, the investment general partner of Series 20 and Series 41 transferred their respective interests in Cascade Commons LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $22,279,256 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $782,140 and $390,483 for Series 20 and Series 41, respectively. Of the total proceeds received, $18,709 and $9,757 for Series 20 and Series 41, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $763,431 and $380,726 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 20 and Series 41, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $763,431 and $380,726 for Series 20 and Series 41, respectively, as of June 30, 2010.

 

In April 2011, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Bennetts Pointe LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,274,688 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $60,000. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $55,000 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 20. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $55,000 as of April 30, 2011. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership entered into a partner interest pledge agreement with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the partner interest pledge agreement, if the property owned by the Operating Partnership is sold within 5 years from the initial transfer date, there would be a residual payment of up to $140,000 distributable to the investment partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement. The partnerspartners’ interest pledge agreement goes into effect at the date the investment limited partner transferred its interest.

In September 2011, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Cynthiana Properties Limited Partnership to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $403,513 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $48,000. Of the total proceeds received, $15,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $33,000 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 20. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $33,000 as of September 30, 2011.

In August 2011, the operating general partner of Goldenrod Limited entered into an agreement to sell the property to an unrelated third-party buyer and the transaction closed on October 18, 2011. The sales price of the property was $6,855,742, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $6,668,627 and cash proceeds of $187,115. Of the total proceeds, $50,000 represents transaction costs and $137,115 was a brokerage commission. There were no proceeds returned to cash reserves held by Series 20 and Series 22, respectively. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership was recorded.

 

In October 2011, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Floral Acres Apartments II to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $976,250 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $41,620. Of the total proceeds received, $16,020 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $10,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $15,600 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 20. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $15,600 as of December 31, 2011.

 

In December 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Bradley Elderly, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $748,904 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $10,000. Of the total proceeds received, $998 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $2,600 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $6,402 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 20. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $6,402 as of December 31, 2012. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership entered into a residual receipt promissory note (the RRN) with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the RRN, if there is a capital transaction involving the property owned by the Operating Partnership at any time within 15 years from the initial transfer date, there would be a residual payment distributable to the investment partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partner transferred its interest.

(Series 21). As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 65 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the series, in total, generated $192,182$499,635 and $233,195,$192,182, respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 and $0.05, respectively,for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

 

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 21 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $77,461$(94,652) and $(10,292),$77,461, respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income from Operating Partnerships and the fund management fee.

 

Fort Halifax Associates, LP (Fort Halifax Commons Apartment) is a 24-unit, 100% Low Income Housing Tax CreditLIHTC property located in Winslow, Maine. AccordingThe property continues to the 2011 audit, the property operatedoperate below breakeven due to low rental rates and a high interest rate on the debt. The property isdebt service. Occupancy remains strong, averaging 92% and 97% in 2011 and 2012, respectively, and increasing to 100% occupied as of March 31, 2012. Management has proposed a rent increase as part of its 2012 budget as increased rental income would offset high debt service, and management is awaiting approval of the budget by the operating general partner. As of March 31, 2012, the mortgage is current, but real estate taxes and insurance payments are delinquent.2013. On October 11, 2011, the lenderMaine State Housing Authority (MSHA) issued a notice of mortgage default on the property due to unpaid taxes, delays in past insurance payments, and underfunded tax, insurance, and replacement reserve escrow accounts. On November 11, 2011, theThe investment general partner issued a letter to the operating general partner on November 11, 2011, stating that the entity isoperating general partner was in violation of the Operating Partnership Agreement for failure to advance funds to meet operating expenses and debt service, including replacement reserves, as the operating general partner’s operating deficit guaranty is unlimited in time and amount. As of the end of

The insurance payment issue was resolved in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the operating general partner submitted a payment plan to the lenderMSHA to address the remaining default issues. However, in August 2012, it was learned that the operating general partner’s proposal was denied by MSHA and the note was called on the property demanding the immediate repayment of the outstanding mortgage balance due or the property would go to auction at a foreclosure sale. The operating general partner refused to make payment and requested consent from the investment general partner to file for protection under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code. The investment general partner determined consent to bankruptcy served the best interest of the Operating Partnership and approval was given and it was filed on September 12, 2012. The property continues its daily operations while in receivership and takes direction from the trustee appointed by the bankruptcy court. The operating general partner is awaitingin negotiations with MSHA to restructure the lender’s decision regarding the plan.debt at a lower interest rate. The investment general partner will continue to work with the operating general partner is working to ensureoutline an agreement that all taxeswill decrease the interest rate on the loan by two to three percentage points annually and reserves are paidinclude a balloon payment due at the end of year five. This would produce a savings of more than $40,000 annually and thatwould likely allow the default is cured.property to operate above breakeven. On December 31, 2009, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Fort Halifax Associates, LP. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.

In December 2011, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Pumphouse Crossing II LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,050,124 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $100,000. Of the total proceeds received, $36,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 will bewas paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $59,000 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 21. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $59,000 as of December 31, 2011.

Black River Run, LP (River Run Apartments) is a 48-unit family property located in Black River Falls, Wisconsin. Occupancy as of March 31, 2012 was 93%. Although expenses remain below the state averages for the investment limited partnership’s portfolio of properties, low rental rates in the area have prevented the property from achieving breakeven operations. The property’s taxes and insurance are current; however, the operating general partner stopped making debt service payments in 2009 due to cash flow shortfalls. In the first quarter of 2010, the investment general partner learned that the property was six months in arrears on its mortgage and that the lender had issued a notice of default. The note was accelerated in April of 2010. The operating general partner contacted the lender in the hope of gaining an interest only forbearance for a four-year period (the note matures in 2014). The lender did not agree to modify the terms of the loan and demanded a payment of $959,495 to be made by April 20, 2010 to cure the default. The operating general partner failed to provide the funds and the lender commenced a foreclosure proceeding. However, the operating general partner continued negotiationsdiscussions with the lender who eventually agreed to terminate the foreclosure proceeding, but in January of 2012 they issued a new notice of default on the loan. In April of 2012, the lender once again agreed to delay the foreclosure. However, on February 25, 2013, the investment general partner was notified that a foreclosure had occurred and was recorded in Jackson County, WI. On December 31, 2009, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Black River Run, LP. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.

A foreclosure sale occurring in 2012 wouldthat occurred did not result in any recapture or penalties because the property iswas beyond the compliance period. As the annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership had previously reduced the investment partnership’s tax basis carrying value to zero, no gain or loss would bewas recognized by the investment partnership as a result of the foreclosure. The operating general partner’s operating guarantee is still in force and he has continued to fund operating deficits.

Lookout Ridge, LP (Lookout Ridge Apartments), was sold to a third-party buyer on November 4, 2010 for $825,000 which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $658,441 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $61,749. Of the total proceeds received, $28,000 represents reporting fees paid to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of these remaining proceeds from the transfer, $8,020 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $25,729 were returned to cash reserves. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $25,729 as of December 31, 2010.

In December 2011, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Pinedale II LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,158,867 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $100,000. Of the total proceeds received, $36,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 will bewas paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $59,000 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 21. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $59,000 as of December 31, 2011.

 

In January 2011, the investment general partner transferred 49.5% of its interest in Tower View LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $526,958 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $0. The remaining 50.5% investment limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership was transferred in January 2012 for the assumption of approximately $417,156 of the remaining outstanding mortgage balance and cash proceeds of $2. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer has been recorded in the amount of $2 as of March 31, 2012. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment limited partnership entered into an agreement with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment, if any. Under the terms of the residual agreement if the property owned by the Operating Partnership is refinanced or sold, on or before December 18, 2013, and cash proceeds are paid to the Operating Partnership as a result of such refinance or sale, there will be a payment of cash proceeds distributable to the investment limited partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partnership transferred its interest.

 

(Series 22). As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had total of 2010 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

 

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the series, in total, generated $(721,904)$114,672 and $(348,651)$(721,904), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 22 was $0. By using the equity method, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(199,453)$173,710 and $541,236,$(199,453), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income from Operating Partnerships and the fund management fee.

 

Elks Tower Apartments, LP (Elks Tower Apartments) is a 27-unit development located in Litchfield, IL. Despite averageAverage occupancy of 96%increased from 88% in the first quarter of2011 to 94% in 2012, theand ended December 2012 at 85% with four vacant units. The property continuescontinued to operate below breakeven in 2012 due to insufficient rental rates and the inability to generate the necessary income to support the parking lot lease and related maintenance expenses. The cash flow. Annual debt service paymentsdeficit was reduced by 33%, but still ended the year with a ($28,000) shortfall. In March 2013, the property was 81% occupied with 5 vacant units. Management continues to focus on improving project cash flow, but most of $35,160the 27 units are roughly 32% of total income.at the maximum allowable rents issued by IHDA. In addition a new 40-unit Illinois Housing Development Authority (IHDA) low income housing tax credit property opened in close proximity to Elks Towers in 2011. Competition from this neighboring property with superior amenities has adversely impacted occupancy and operations at Elks Tower. The operating general partner covers deficitssubsidizes the deficit by accruing payments towards a parking lot lease and an annual maintenance contract owed to a related entity. During 2011, the operating general partner advanced funds to the Operating Partnership to cover a legal settlement of $10,000 with a contractor that worked on the original construction of the project. The mortgage, real estate taxes, and insurance payments are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2011.

 

Black River Run, LP (River Run Apartments) is a 48-unit family property located in Black River Falls, Wisconsin. Occupancy as of March 31, 2012 was 93%. Although expenses remain below the state averages for the investment limited partnership’s portfolio of properties, low rental rates in the area have prevented the property from achieving breakeven operations. The property’s taxes and insurance are current; however, the operating general partner stopped making debt service payments in 2009 due to cash flow shortfalls. In the first quarter of 2010, the investment general partner learned that the property was six months in arrears on its mortgage and that the lender had issued a notice of default. The note was accelerated in April of 2010. The operating general partner contacted the lender in the hope of gaining an interest only forbearance for a four-year period (the note matures in 2014). The lender did not agree to modify the terms of the loan and demanded a payment of $959,495 to be made by April 20, 2010 to cure the default. The operating general partner failed to provide the funds and the lender commenced a foreclosure proceeding. However, the operating general partner continued negotiationsdiscussions with the lender who eventually agreed to terminate the foreclosure proceeding, but in January of 2012 they issued a new notice of default on the loan. In April of 2012, the lender once again agreed to delay the foreclosure. However, on February 25, 2013, the investment general partner was notified that a foreclosure had occurred and was recorded in Jackson County, WI. On December 31, 2009, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Black River Run, LP. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.

A foreclosure sale occurring in 2012 wouldthat occurred did not result in any recapture or penalties because the property iswas beyond the compliance period. As the annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership had previously reduced the investment partnership’s tax basis carrying value to zero, no gain or loss would bewas recognized by the investment partnership as a result of the foreclosure. The operating general partner’s operating guarantee is still in force and he has continued to fund operating deficit.

In July 2010,August 2011, the operating general partner of Edmond Properties, A Limited Partnership approvedBayou Crossing LP entered into an agreement to sell the property to an unrelated third partythird-party buyer and the transaction closed on August 10, 2010.October 18, 2011. The sales price forof the property was $6,565,000,$7,907,011, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $4,198,481$7,679,103 and cash proceeds of $227,908. Of the total proceeds, $50,000 represents transaction costs and $177,908 was a brokerage commission. There were no proceeds returned to cash reserves held by Series 22 and Series 23, respectively. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership was recorded.

In December 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Richmond Hardin to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $727,661 and cash proceeds to the investment partnershipspartnership of $654,789 and $654,789 for Series 22 and Series 23, respectively.$34,240. Of the total proceeds received, $7,500$4,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and $7,500 for Series 22 and Series 23, respectively,the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale,transfer, which includesinclude third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $647,289 and $647,289 for Series 22 and Series 23, respectively,approximately $24,740 were returned to cash reserves.reserves held by Series 22. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current-operatingcurrent operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’spartnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $24,740 as of December 31, 2012.

In August 2011, the operating general partner of Goldenrod Limited entered into an agreement to sell the property to an unrelated third-party buyer and the transaction closed on October 18, 2011. The sales price of the property was $6,855,742, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $6,668,627 and cash proceeds of $187,115. Of the total proceeds, $50,000 represents transaction costs and $137,115 was a brokerage commission. There were no proceeds returned to cash reserves held by Series 20 and Series 22, respectively. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership was recorded.

In August 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Cobblestone Village LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,337,601 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $45,375. Of the total proceeds received, $3,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $41,875 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 22. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $41,875 as of September 30, 2012.

In August 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Quankey Hills LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $945,439 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $33,000. Of the total proceeds received, $600 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $3,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $28,900 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 22. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $28,900 as of September 30, 2012.

In August 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Salem Limited Partnership to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $837,568 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $33,000. Of the total proceeds received, $600 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $3,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $28,900 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 22. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $28,900 as of September 30, 2012.

In November 2012, the investment general partner sold its interest in Philadelphia Housing I to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $521,444 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $38,000. Of the total proceeds received by the investment partnership, $15,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $23,000 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 22. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $647,289$23,000 as of December 31, 2012.

In November 2012, the investment general partner sold its interest in Philadelphia Housing II to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $814,722 and $647,289cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $59,375. Of the total proceeds received by the investment partnership, $15,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $44,375 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 22. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $44,375 as of December 31, 2012.

In December 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Albemarle Village LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,327,770 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $49,500. Of the total proceeds received, $3,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $46,000 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 22. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $46,000 as of December 31, 2012.

In December 2012, the investment general partner of Series 22 and Series 23 transferred their respective interests in Crystal City/Festus Partnership LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,191,310 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $21,400 and $21,400 for Series 22 and Series 23, respectively. Of the total proceeds received, $2,500 and $2,500 for Series 22 and Series 23, respectively, aswas paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of September 30, 2010. In December 2010, the investment partnerships received additional proceeds for its share of the Operating Partnership’s cash in the amount of $15,150approximately $18,900 and $15,150 which$18,900 were returned to the cash reserves held by Series 22 and Series 23, respectively. In January 2011,The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnerships received its sharepartnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership’sPartnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $18,900 and $18,900 for Series 22 and Series 23, respectively, as of December 31, 2012.

In December 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Troy Villa to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,599,131 and cash totaling $2,472proceeds to the investment partnership of $68,480. Of the total proceeds received, $1,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which $1,236 and $1,236include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $61,980 were returned to the cash reserves held by Series 2222. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $61,980 as of December 31, 2012.

In January 2013, the investment general partner transferred 50% of its interest in Lake City LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $610,340 and no cash proceeds to the investment partnership. The remaining 50% investment limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership is scheduled to be transferred in January 2014 for the assumption of approximately $610,399 of the remaining outstanding mortgage balance and anticipated cash proceeds of $0. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership was recorded. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment limited partnership entered into an agreement with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment, if any. Under the terms of the residual agreement if the property owned by the Operating Partnership is refinanced or sold, on or before December 18, 2013, and cash proceeds are paid to the Operating Partnership as a result of such refinance or sale, there will be a payment of cash proceeds distributable to the investment limited partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partnership transferred its interest.

(Series 23). As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 11 properties at March 31, 2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the series, in total, generated $(427,580) and $(1,140,909), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 23 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $7,680 and $(176,389), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income from Operating Partnerships, miscellaneous income, and the fund management fee.

Colonna Redevelopment Company (Colonna House) is a 36-unit development located in Hempstead, NY. The property operated slightly below breakeven in 2011. In 2012 occupancy remained stable at 92% and the property operated above breakeven. Through the first quarter of 2013, occupancy averaged 93% and the property continued to operate above breakeven. However, the replacement reserve has not been fully funded and the accounts payable balance remains high. Further, over $360,000 is due from the operating general partner and affiliates for unapproved loans from the Operating Partnership. Additionally, the reporting from the operating general partner has been sporadic. The former management company was replaced on June 1, 2010 without the investment general partner’s approval. There is minimal management oversight at the property as there is only one maintenance person on site on a consistent basis. The investment general partner continues to work with the management company in an attempt to better understand operating results and initiatives for the property. On December 31, 2009, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Colonna Redevelopment Company.

Halls Ferry Apartments LP (Riverview Apartments) is a 42-unit complex located in St. Louis, MO. Despite average physical occupancy of 90% in the first quarter of 2013, the property operated below breakeven due to low economic occupancy caused by a soft rental market and insufficient rental rates. The operating general partner continues to focus on marketing, as there is considerable tax credit competition in the area. Management is aggressively advertising in local publications and online sources. To attract applicants, management continues to offer rental concessions and resident referral fees. The operating general partner continues to fund operating deficits despite the expiration of the operating deficit guarantee. To date, the operating general partner has advanced $146,810 to cover operating deficits. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes and insurance are current. On December 31, 2010, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Halls Ferry Apartments LP.

 

In August 2011, the operating general partner of Bayou Crossing LP entered into an agreement to sell the property to an unrelated third-party buyer and the transaction closed on October 18, 2011. The sales price of the property was $7,907,011, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $7,679,103 and cash proceeds of $227,908. Of the total proceeds, $50,000 represents transaction costs and $177,908 was a brokerage commission. There were no proceeds returned to cash reserves held by Series 22 and Series 23, respectively. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership was recorded.

 

Richmond Hardin, LP (Richmond Square Apartments) is a 32-unit family property located in Richmond, Missouri. Despite much stronger occupancy and a 13% drop in expenses, the property operated below breakeven in 2011. As a result of management’s marketing efforts, the property averaged 89% through first quarter, but increased to 97% in March 2012. Management increased advertising and outreach to social service agencies, area employers, and community organizations by distributing marketing materials within a 30 mile radius, and by advertising weekly in the local and county newspapers and on Craig’s List. Management also continued offering a temporary rental incentive of $105 off rent per month for the first year. Since occupancy has stabilized and the rents are low compared to the competition in the area, management plans on implementing a rent increase of $10 per unit effective January 1,In July 2012, which will increase gross potential rent by $3,840 annually. Management will evaluate the effects of the rent increase on occupancy and, if minimal, look to increase rents again in 2012. Real estate taxes were high due to the fact that the property pays both county and city taxes. The county rate is comparable to what other properties pay in the market; however, the city rate raises the total paid for real estate taxes to 24% more than properties in other counties across Missouri. As of March 31, 2012, the mortgage, real estate taxes and insurance are current. On December 31, 2009, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Richmond Hardin. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.

In August 2010, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Lost Tree Limited PartnershipMathis Apartments, Ltd. to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,320,388$850,902 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $100,050.$9,000. Of the total proceeds received, $2,875 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,950 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which included third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $91,225 were returned to cash reserves. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $91,225 as of September 30, 2010.

In December 2010, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Sacramento Properties Limited to a non-affiliated entity for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $412,797 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $5,001. Of the total proceeds received, $5,001 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. There were no proceeds returned to cash reserves held by Series 22. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership has been recorded as of December 31, 2010.

In August 2011, the operating general partner of Goldenrod Limited entered into an agreement to sell the property to an unrelated third-party buyer and the transaction closed on October 18, 2011. The sales price of the property was $6,855,742, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $6,668,627 and cash proceeds of $187,115. Of the total proceeds, $50,000 represents transaction costs and $137,115 was a brokerage commission. There were no proceeds returned to cash reserves held by Series 20 and Series 22, respectively. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership was recorded.

Kimbark 1200 Associates, Limited Partnership is a 48-unit property located in Longmont, Colorado. The property operated below breakeven in 2011. In the first quarter of 2012, the property continued to operate slightly below breakeven, but occupancy increased to 94%. Bad debt was high in 2011 as the new site manager evicted habitually non-paying residents after she was hired in March 2011. In the first quarter of 2012, bad debt decreased due to management’s stringent collections policies. Rental rates decreased over the past two years due to competitive market conditions but rebounded slightly in the first quarter of 2012. In 2011, maintenance expenses were high due to routine repairs required by the age of the property as well as resident turnover. Through the first quarter of 2012, maintenance expenses are within budget. Real estate taxes also increased in 2011; the operating general partner contracted with a firm to appeal the tax increases, but its efforts were unsuccessful. The investment general partner will continue to work with management and the operating general partner to ensure that occupancy continues to improve and maintenance expenses remain within budget. As of March 31, 2012, the mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current. On December 31, 2010, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Kimbark 1200 Associates, Limited Partnership. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.

(Series 23).    As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 15 properties at March 31, 2012, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the series, in total, generated $(1,140,909) and $45,249, respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 23 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the net income (loss) of the series was $(176,389) and $610,391, respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income from Operating Partnerships and the fund management fee.

Colonna Redevelopment Company (Colonna House) is a 36-unit development located in Hempstead, NY. Replacement reserves have not been fully funded and the accounts payable balance remains high. Over $360,000 is due from the operating general partner and affiliates for unapproved loans from the Operating Partnership. Asset management fees are guaranteed and remain outstanding. In addition, the Operating Partnership reporting from the operating general partner is sporadic. The former management company was replaced on June 1, 2010 without the investment general partner’s approval. On August 25, 2010, the lender filed a Summons and Complaint, which initiated the foreclosure process due to non-payment. The operating general partner and the lender came to a payment agreement in which payment in full was made on February 10, 2011 and the mortgage was assigned to an operating general partner related entity. Through 2011 average occupancy was 89% with operations remaining below breakeven. A site visit was conducted in the fourth quarter of 2011 that revealed several issues with regard to water infiltrating the brick/mortar throughout the building. A total of $28,300 was spent on roof repairs and repointing around the air conditioner sleeves in an attempt to stop the water infiltration. As this didn’t address the issue, management intends to seal the brick exterior of the building in 2012, costing approximately $50,000. The investment general partner continues to request the 2012 budget in order to understand how these capital initiatives will be funded. There is minimal management oversight at the property as there is only one maintenance person on site on a consistent basis. In first quarter 2012, occupancy continued to be stable at 89%. The investment general partner continues to liaise with the management company in an attempt to better understand operating results and initiatives for the property. On December 31, 2009, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Colonna Redevelopment Company.

Halls Ferry Apartments LP (Riverview Apartments) is a 42-unit complex located in St. Louis, MO. Despite average physical occupancy of 100% in the first quarter of 2012, the property operated below breakeven due to low economic occupancy caused by a soft rental market and insufficient rental rates. The operating general partner continues to focus on marketing, as there is considerable tax credit competition in the area. Management is aggressively advertising in local publications and online sources. To attract applicants, management continues to offer rental concessions and resident referral fees. The operating general partner continues to fund operating deficits despite the expiration of the operating deficit guarantee. To date, the operating general partner has advanced $146,810 to cover operating deficits. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes and insurance are current. On December 31, 2010, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Halls Ferry Apartments LP.

South Hills Apartments (South Hills Apartments, LP) is a 72-unit, family property located in Bellevue, Nebraska. In 2008, the property operated below breakeven as a result of low occupancy, low rental rates and overly burdensome debt, which carried an interest rate of 10.4%. Due to a number of job losses in the area, occupancy decreased to 82% for 2009. There were few qualified prospective residents that could afford the tax credit rents without obtaining rental assistance, which was limited. The property was also competing with newer properties, which offered superior amenity packages. Despite management’s marketing and rent collection efforts, the property continued to operate below breakeven in 2009.

Historically, the operating general partner had funded operating deficits in accordance with its operating deficit guarantee, which is unlimited in time and amount. However, in the first quarter of 2009, the operating general partner indicated that it would not continue to support the operations due to financial constraints. As a result, the Operating Partnership missed the April and June mortgage payments. In July 2009, the lender served the Operating Partnership with a Notice of Default and Election to Sell. In addition, the mortgage was in technical default, as it fell below the required minimum combined escrow (real estate taxes, insurance, and replacement reserves) balance of $50,000. The lender demanded a payment of $70,000 to be made by August 3, 2009, to cure the default; however, the operating general partner failed to provide such funds. The lender commenced a foreclosure action on August 4, 2009, with a foreclosure sale that was scheduled for October 20, 2009. At that time, the investment general partner determined that the costs associated with maintaining the property through December 31, 2010, the end of the low income housing tax credit compliance period, appeared to be greater than the benefit associated with maintaining tax credit compliance.

In September 2009, a buyer was identified who was willing to purchase the interests of the Operating Partnership for a nominal amount and keep the property affordable through the remainder of the compliance period, if the lender would agree to withdraw the foreclosure filing. However, the lender rejected this proposal and, in October, accepted a bid from another buyer to purchase from the lender the outstanding debt on the property. The new lender delayed the foreclosure for several weeks. On December 1, 2009, the operating general partner, investment general partner, and new lender signed an agreement to transfer the deed to the lender in lieu of foreclosure in January 2010. On January 4, 2010, the deed was transferred to the new lender. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the foreclosure of the Operating Partnership has been recorded as of March 31, 2010. It was originally estimated that a foreclosure occurring in 2010 would result in the Operating Partnership experiencing estimated recapture and interest of $360,713, equivalent to $106 per 1,000 BACs. However, the property appears to have maintained its affordable housing minimum set-aside through 2010, due to the three year vacancy decontrol rule set forth in Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code, which prevents owners from evicting current residents for three years. As a result, the actual recapture costs were based only on the units that were not occupied by income qualified residents in 2010. This resulted in recapture and interest of $148,802 to the Operating Partnership, equivalent to approximately $44 per 1,000 BACs.

In July 2010, the operating general partner of Edmond Properties, A Limited Partnership approved an agreement to sell the property to an unrelated third party and the transaction closed on August 10, 2010. The sales price for the property was $6,565,000, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $4,198,481 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $654,789 and $654,789 for Series 22 and Series 23, respectively. Of the total proceeds received, $7,500 and $7,500 for Series 22 and Series 23, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $647,289 and $647,289 for Series 22 and Series 23, respectively, were returned to cash reserves. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current-operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $647,289 and $647,289 for Series 22 and Series 23, respectively, as of September 30, 2010. In December 2010, the investment partnerships received additional proceeds for its share of the Operating Partnership’s cash in the amount of $15,150, and $15,150 which were returned to the cash reserves held by Series 22 and Series 23, respectively. In January 2011, the investment partnerships received its share of the remaining Operating Partnership’s cash totaling $2,472 of which $1,236 and $1,236 were returned to the cash reserves held by Series 22 and Series 23, respectively.

In August 2011, the operating general partner of Bayou Crossing LP entered into an agreement to sell the property to an unrelated third-party buyer and the transaction closed on October 18, 2011. The sales price of the property was $7,907,011, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $7,679,103 and cash proceeds of $227,908. Of the total proceeds, $50,000 represents transaction costs and $177,908 was a brokerage commission. There were no proceeds returned to cash reserves held by Series 22 and Series 23, respectively. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership was recorded.

In February 2010, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Broderick Housing Associates LP to a non-affiliated entity for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,611,311 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $51,780. The transaction closed on April 26, 2010. Of the total proceeds received $10,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $20,400$2,625 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the transfer of $21,380approximately $6,375 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 23. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’spartnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the saletransfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale,transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $21,380$6,375 as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010.

2012. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership entered into a residual receipt promissory note (the RRN) with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the RRN, if there is a capital transaction involving the property owned by the Operating Partnership at any time within 15 years from the initial transfer date, there would be a residual payment distributable to the investment partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partner transferred its interest. The investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership also executed a Transfer and Assignment of Mineral Rights preserving the investment partnership’s right to any potential proceeds that may be distributed from production of minerals at the property.

In March 2011,July 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Barlee Properties LPOrange Grove Seniors to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $721,401$621,696 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $23,250.$9,000. Of the total proceeds received, $7,281 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $12,300$2,625 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $3,669$6,375 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 23. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’spartnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the saletransfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale,transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $3,669$6,375 as of March 31, 2011.

Woodland Hills Properties, A LP (Woodland Hills Apartments)September 30, 2012. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership entered into a residual receipt promissory note (the RRN) with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the RRN, if there is a 10-unitcapital transaction involving the property located in Roland, OK. The property’s low-income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2009. The operating general partner ceased making debt service payments and funding deficits in September 2009. On February 24, 2010,owned by the lender declared default ofOperating Partnership at any time within 15 years from the loan and began foreclosure proceedings. On July 7, 2010,initial transfer date, there would be a foreclosure sale was completed and titleresidual payment distributable to the property was conveyed.investment partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partner transferred its interest. The investment general partner was not notifiedon behalf of the foreclosure byinvestment partnership also executed a Transfer and Assignment of Mineral Rights preserving the lender or operating general partner. Theinvestment partnership’s right to any potential proceeds that may be distributed from production of minerals at the property.

In December 2012, the investment general partner is workingof Series 22 and Series 23 transferred their respective interests in Crystal City/Festus Partnership LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner’s attorneypartner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,191,310 and cash proceeds to retrieve foreclosure documentation. Nothe investment partnerships of $21,400 and $21,400 for Series 22 and Series 23, respectively. Of the total proceeds received, $2,500 and $2,500 for Series 22 and Series 23, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $18,900 and $18,900 were returned to cash reserves.reserves held by Series 22 and Series 23, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, noa gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership wasof the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $18,900 and $18,900 for Series 22 and Series 23, respectively, as of September 30, 2010.December 31, 2012.

Kimbark 1200 Associates, Limited Partnership is a 48-unit property located in Longmont, Colorado. The property operated below breakeven in 2011. In the first quarter ofDecember 2012, the property continuedinvestment general partner transferred its interest in St. Peters Villa to operate slightly below breakeven, but occupancy increased to 94%. Bad debt was high in 2011 as the new site manager evicted habitually non-paying residents after she was hired in March 2011. In the first quarter of 2012, bad debt decreased due to management’s stringent collections policies. Rental rates decreased over the past two years due to competitive market conditions but rebounded slightly in the first quarter of 2012. In 2011, maintenance expenses were high due to routine repairs required by the age of the property as well as resident turnover. Through the first quarter of 2012, maintenance expenses are within budget. Real estate taxes also increased in 2011;an entity affiliated with the operating general partner contracted with a firmfor its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,521,457 and cash proceeds to appeal the tax increases, but its efforts were unsuccessful. The investment general partner will continuepartnership of $57,780. Of the total proceeds received, $1,500 represents reporting fees due to work with managementan affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $51,280 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 23. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating general partnerexpenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to ensure that occupancy continues to improvezero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and maintenance expenses remain within budget. Asexpense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of March 31, 2012, the mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current. On$51,280 as of December 31, 2010, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Kimbark 1200 Associates, Limited Partnership. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the Investment Partnership.2012.


(Series 24). As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 1813 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

 

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the series, in total, generated $(729,451)$603,180 and $275,678,$(729,451), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

 

As of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 24 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

 

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 the net income (loss) of the Series was $24,116$1,665,868 and $(117,314),24,116, respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income from Operating Partnerships and the fund management fee.

Commerce Parkway Limited Dividend Housing Associates (Park Meadows Apartments) is an 80-unit family property located in Gaylord, Michigan.  The property had declining occupancy which led to below breakeven operations in 2012.  The Gaylord, Michigan economy was weak in 2012 and several tenants lost their jobs as a result.  In addition, there are two new LIHTC projects that recently opened in the market along with two others under construction. The two new projects are located within three miles of Commerce Parkway and are contributing to the declining occupancy. In 2012, occupancy averaged 88% and as of March 31, 2013 occupancy was 79%. In the first quarter of 2013, operating expenses were a challenge. The property experienced higher than average turnover due to evictions for non-payment of rent, which in turn increased maintenance costs. Increased marketing efforts have contributed to higher than budgeted administrative costs. The operating general partner stated that continuing to increase the marketing budget will not counter the flow of tenants to the upgraded amenities at the newer properties. Only an increased renter pool as a result of an improved economy will reverse this trend. The mortgage, taxes and insurance are current.  On December 31, 2011, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Commerce Parkway Limited Dividend Housing Associates.

Elm Street Associates, LP (Elm Street Apartments) is a 35-unit property located in Yonkers, New York. The neighborhood has been a difficult one in which to operate due to high crime. Almost all the residents use some public subsidy, making this a very management-intensive property. Poor tenancy has historically resulted in operating deficits. Other management issues, including poor rent collections and deferred maintenance, have also negatively impacted the property. OccupancyPhysical occupancy averaged 88%93% in 2012, and through in 2011, but dropped \ slightly inMarch 2013 physical occupancy averaged 100%. Operating expenses through the first quarter of 2012 to an average of 84%. Operating expenses2013 are running higher than in 2012, are running slightly above 2011 actuals, primarily due to increased utilities.charged off bad-debt. The collections issue causes economic occupancy on this asset to average in the low 80% range and the property continues to operate below breakeven. The operating general partner has funded the operating deficits through cash infusions and deferred management fees. The replacement reserve is fully funded. The operating general partner’sManagement’s long-term goal is to work on improving and stabilizing the neighborhood in order to attract and retain residents. They have a longstanding and ongoing commitment to the residents of southwest Yonkers where their housing programs and service offices are located. The operating general partner remainsremain committed to the property and the neighborhood and have expressed a willingness to continue funding deficits. The mortgage, real estate taxes, and insurance payments are all current. TheOn December 31, 2010, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired December 31, 2010.with respect to Elm Street Associates, LP. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.

 

In June 2012, the investment general partners of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III LP - Series 19 and Series 24 and Series 42 transferred their respective interests in Jeremy Associates LP (Coopers Crossing Apartments) is a 93-unit family development located in Las Colinas, Texas. Despite years of maintaining very strong occupancy, the property consistently operates below breakeven due to high expenses. Occupancy averaged 99% in the first quarter of 2012. Expenses are high mainly due to high maintenance costs as a result of physical deficiencies in a number of buildings on site. Since construction, a number of the buildings have had differential settlement issues resulting in cracked floor slabs, cracked brick veneer, cracking windows and doors and sagging balconies. These concerns have been addressed on an ongoing basis via advances by the operating general partner. Cost control efforts include staffing reduction, reduced marketing and the shutting down of one boiler during warmer months. The operating general partner continues to fund operating deficits despite the expiration of the operating deficit guarantee. So farentity affiliated with the operating general partner has advanced over $2,100,000 for repairsits assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,804,427 and operating deficits in additioncash proceeds to deferring its affiliated company’s property management fee. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxesthe investment partnerships of $18,200, $4,536, and insurance are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2010. The$2,264, for Series 19, Series 24 and Series 42, respectively. Of the total proceeds received $13,200, $4,536, and $2,264, for Series 19, Series 24 and Series 42, respectively, represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the respective investment general partner ispartnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. No proceeds were returned to cash reserves held by Series 19, Series 24 and Series 42, respectively. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistentOperating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment objectiveslimited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the sale of the investment partnership.Operating Partnership was recorded as of June 30, 2012.

 

New Hilltop Apartments, Phase II (Hilltop Apartments) is a 72-unit property located in Laurens, SC. Only twenty-one of the property's units have rental assistance, and the property has trouble competing with properties that offer more units with rental assistance. In 2011, average occupancyOccupancy was 93% as of March 31, 2013. However, operations were below breakeven because increased concessions were required in order to 96% from 92% in the prior year and, as a result, the property operated above breakeven. Occupancy continued to increase in the first quarter ending March 2012 at 96%. The improved occupancy is the result of a new community manager and a one-month rent concession.maintain occupancy. Management continues to market the property through local media and civic organizations. The mortgage, real estate tax, insurance, and payables to non-related entities are current. The operating general partner’s guarantee expired at the end of 2010. On December 31, 2009, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to New Hilltop Apartments, Phase II. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.

Lake Apartments I, LP (Lake Apartments I) is a 24-unit property located in Fargo, ND. In 2011, the average occupancy was 93% and the property operated at breakeven, despite increased maintenance and administrative expenses relating to tenant turnover. In early 2010 management made the property pet friendly, opening the door to a new resident base, which had a positive effect on operations. At the close of the first quarter of 2012 the physical occupancy was 100% and the property was operating above breakeven. Management continues to remain diligent in reducing tenant turnover through aggressive marketing tactics, which include advertisements in the local newspaper and the Apartment Finder Magazine. Management states that market conditions have strengthened and leasing activities have increased. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes, and insurance are current. On December 31, 2009, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Lake Apartments I LP. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.

In July 2011, the investment general partner of Series 24 and Series 25 transferred its interest in New Madison Park IV LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $13,147,712 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $110,731 and $196,854 to Series 24 and Series 25, respectively. Of the total proceeds received, $3,600 and $6,400 from Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $107,131 and $190,454 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 24 and Series 25, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $107,131 and $190,454 by Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, as of July 31, 2011.

 

In December 2011, the investment general partner transferred its interest in North Hampton Place, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $624,027 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $38,520. Of the total proceeds received, $1,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 will bewas paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $32,020 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 24. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $32,020 as of December 31, 2011.

In April 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Coolidge Pinal II Associates LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,067,708 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $32,680. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 will bewas paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $27,680 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 24. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $27,680 as of June 30, 2012.

In August 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Edenfield Place Apartments LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,073,303 and receipt of a Promissory Note (the “Note”) to the investment partnership in the amount of $156,952 maturing on December 31, 2012. The Note was paid on November 7, 2012. Of the amounts paid under the Note, $5,010 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $146,942 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 24. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a receivable for the gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, was recorded in the amount of $146,942 as of September 30, 2012. As of December 31, 2012 the proceeds were received and applied against the receivable. An additional gain of $9,999 was recorded on the transfer as of December 31, 2012.

In August, 2012, with the consent of the investment general partner the operating general partner of Zwolle Partnership entered into an agreement to sell the property to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner and the transaction closed on August 17, 2012. The sales price of the property was $820,435, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $775,635 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $44,800. Of the total proceeds received by the investment partnership, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $39,800 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 24. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $39,800 as of September 30, 2012. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership executed a Transfer and Assignment of Mineral Rights preserving the investment partnership’s right to any potential proceeds that may be distributed from production of minerals at the property.

In November 2012, the operating general partner of SG Wyandotte LP entered into an agreement to sell the property to a non-affiliated third party buyer and the transaction closed on December 28, 2012. The sales price of the property was $8,793,375, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,768,832 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $1,533,196 and $2,117,270 for Series 24 and Series 25, respectively. Of the total proceeds received by the investment partnerships, $2,753 and $3,802 for Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of approximately $1,530,443 and $2,113,468 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 24 and Series 25, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $1,530,443 and $2,113,468 for Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, as of December 31, 2012. In February 2013, the investment partnerships received additional proceeds for its share of the Operating Partnership’s cash in the amount of $38,837 and $53,631, which were returned to the cash reserves held by Series 24 and Series 25, respectively.

In March 2013, the operating general partner of Lake Apartments I LP approved an agreement to sell the property to an unaffiliated entity and the transaction is scheduled to close in July 2013. The sales price for the property is $1,000,000, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $465,241 and estimated cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $359,099. Of the estimated proceeds to be received by the investment partnership, $31,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of approximately $322,599 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 24. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution.

 

(Series 25). As of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 117 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

 

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the series, in total, generated $587,709$(907,518) and $227,143,$587,709, respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 25 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

 

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $1,220,041$3,048,059 and $440,077,$1,220,041, respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income from Operating Partnerships, miscellaneous income, and the fund management fee.

 

In September 2010, the operating general partner of Sutton Place Apartments Limited Partnership entered into an agreement to sell the property to an unrelated third party buyer and the transaction closed on April 21, 2011. The sales price of the property was $9,400,000, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $5,010,000 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $947,216. Of the total proceeds received by the investment partnership, $60,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $15,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of approximately $872,216 were returned to cash reserves. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $872,216 as of April 30, 2011.

In December 2011, the investment general partner transferred its interest in M.R.H., LP (The Mary Ryder Home) to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $0 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $168,850. Of the total proceeds received, $3,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $15,244 will bewas paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $150,106 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 25. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. The sale proceeds were received in January 2012; so a receivable in the amount of $150,106 was recorded as of December 31, 2011. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $150,106 as of December 31, 2011.

In January 2010, the operating general partner of Sandstone Village Limited Partnership entered into an agreement to sell the property to an unrelated third party buyer and the transaction closed on April 9, 2010. The sales price of the property was $1,509,127, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,324,657 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $27,542. Of the total proceeds received, $13,134 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $14,408 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. No proceeds from the sale were returned to cash reserves. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.

In December 2010, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Maple Hill, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $621,609 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $98,292. Of the total proceeds received, $3,914 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $10,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $84,378 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 25. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $84,378 as of December 31, 2010. In addition, the investment partnership received $48,325 that was contingent upon several factors including timely completion of a minor rehabilitation on June 25, 2012. The additional proceeds were returned to cash reserves.

In January 2011, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Main Everett Housing LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $513,023 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $231,170. Of the total proceeds received, $15,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $216,170 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 25. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $216,170 as of March 31, 2011.

In January 2011, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Osborne Housing LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $354,307 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $183,965. Of the total proceeds received, $15,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $168,965 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 25. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $168,965 as of March 31, 2011.

In May 2011, the investment general partner of transferred its interest in Ohio Investors LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,167,881 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $7,071. Of the total proceeds received, $4,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. The remaining proceeds of approximately $2,571 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 25. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $2,571 as of May 31, 2011.

 

In July 2011, the investment general partner of Series 24 and Series 25 transferred its interest in New Madison Park IV LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $13,147,712 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $110,731 and $196,854 to Series 24 and Series 25, respectively. Of the total proceeds received, $3,600 and $6,400 from Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $107,131 and $190,454 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 24 and Series 25, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $107,131 and $190,454 by Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, as of July 31, 2011.

In July 2011, the investment general partner of transferred its interest in Smith House II LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $938,798 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $4,500. Of the total proceeds received, $4,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. No remaining proceeds were returned to cash reserves held by Series 25. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.

 

In August 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in 352 Lenox Associates LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $541,368 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $263,807. Of the total proceeds received, $3,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $255,807 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 25. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $255,807 as of September 30, 2012.

In November 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Mokapoke LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,163,254 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $10,000. Of the total proceeds received, $3,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $6,500 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 25. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $6,500 as of December 31, 2012. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership entered into a residual receipt promissory note (the RRN) with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the RRN, if there is a capital transaction involving the property owned by the Operating Partnership at any time within ten years from the initial transfer date, there would be a residual payment distributable to the investment partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partner transferred its interest.

In November 2012, the operating general partner of SG Wyandotte LP entered into an agreement to sell the property to a non-affiliated third party buyer and the transaction closed on December 28, 2012. The sales price of the property was $8,793,375, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,768,832 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $1,533,196 and $2,117,270 for Series 24 and Series 25, respectively. Of the total proceeds received by the investment partnerships, $2,753 and $3,802 for Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of approximately $1,530,443 and $2,113,468 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 24 and Series 25, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $1,530,443 and $2,113,468 for Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, as of December 31, 2012. In February 2013, the investment partnerships received additional proceeds for its share of the Operating Partnership’s cash in the amount of $38,837 and $53,631, which were returned to the cash reserves held by Series 24 and Series 25, respectively.

In January 2013, the investment general partner transferred 50% of its interest in Rose Square LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $185,416 and no cash proceeds to the investment partnership. The remaining 50% investment limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership is scheduled to be transferred in January 2014 for the assumption of approximately $185,416 of the remaining outstanding mortgage balance and anticipated cash proceeds of $0. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership was recorded. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment limited partnership entered into an agreement with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment, if any. Under the terms of the residual agreement if the property owned by the Operating Partnership is refinanced or sold, on or before December 18, 2013, and cash proceeds are paid to the Operating Partnership as a result of such refinance or sale, there will be a payment of cash proceeds distributable to the investment limited partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partnership transferred its interest.

In February 2013, the operating general partner of Century East II Apartments, Limited Partnership entered into an agreement to sell the property to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner and the transaction closed on March 28, 2013. The sales price of the property was $1,380,000, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,043,783 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $626,889. Of the total proceeds received by the investment partnership, $3,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $618,889 were be returned to cash reserves held by Series 25. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $618,889 as of March 31, 2013. As the proceeds from the sale were not received until April 2013 a receivablefor the gain on the sale was recorded as of March 31, 2013.

Dublin Housing Associates, Phase II, A North Carolina LP (Rosewood Estates, Phase II), is 16-unit, elderly property located in Bladenboro, NC. The property operated below breakeven in 2012 with a cash deficit of ($13,000). The low occupancy and insufficient rental rates largely contributed to the shortfall. During the first quarter of 2012, the operating general partner replaced the management company. During this transition, occupancy declined from 94% to 81%. As of March 31, 2013, occupancy increased to 100%. According to the 2013 operating budget, Rural Development has approved a $25 monthly rental increase per unit. Through March 31, 2013 the property was operating at a deficit. The property is funding the replacement reserve deposits as required, the balance in the replacement reserve account as of December 31, 2012 was nearly $84,000 ($5,250 per unit). The mortgage, taxes and insurance were all current through March 31, 2013. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2011.

(Series 26). As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 3931 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the series, in total, generated $(2,552,267)$(4,578,237) and $(3,886,326)$(2,552,267), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 and $0.01, respectively,for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

 

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships

for Series 26 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

 

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(148,277)$1,778,373 and $1,140,769,$(148,277), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income from Operating Partnerships, miscellaneous income, and the fund management fee.

 

Country Edge, LP (Country Edge Apts.)Beauregard Apartments Partnership, A L.D.H.A. (New Hope Bailey Apartments) is a 48-unit40-unit property located in Fargo, North Dakota.DeRidder, Louisiana. In 2011, occupancy averaged 93% and the property operated above breakeven. Operations improved due to increasedexperienced a decline in occupancy decreasedthat resulted in below breakeven operations. The operating expenses,general partner stated that many tenants had lost jobs or experienced reduced hours resulting in both skips and decreased bad debt. In order to increase marketability,evictions. To improve occupancy, the operating general partner made physical improvements, such as adding new landscapingopted to rent several units at a lower set aside of 50%. Management also advertised rental specials in the local newspaper to increase traffic to the property. As of December 31, 2012 occupancy increased to 93% and replacing appliances.operations were above breakeven. Management continued to focus on improving leasing and reducing expenditures associated with turnover costs in the first quarter of 2013. As of March 31, 2012, physical occupancy was 94%. A substantial storm struck2013, the property in July of 2011, causing shinglewas 93% occupied and siding damage. The repairs were paid out of operations with insurance proceeds being received in October 2011. Management remains diligent in marketing and advertising throughout the local community via billboards and fliers. Thewas operating general partner continues to fund all operating deficits as operations are supported by an unlimited guarantee.slightly above breakeven. The mortgage, trade payables, propertyreal estate taxes, and insurance are current. On December 31, 2012,2010, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period will expireexpired with respect to Country Edge, LP.Beauregard Apartments Partnership, A L.D.H.A.

Butler Estates A L.D.H.A. (Butler Estates Apartments) is a 10-unit development located in Leesville, Louisiana. A site visit in December 2012 revealed significant deferred maintenance. At the time of the inspection, six of the ten units were vacant. The investment general partner sent a letter to the operating general partner in January 2013 describing the issues that were observed and requested the issues be addressed within thirty days. The operating general partner responded in writing with its plan to address the repairs. The property operated slightly below breakeven for the year 2012. As of March 31, 2013, occupancy was at 80% and the property has stabilized and is now operating above breakeven,property’s operations remained below breakeven. In 2013, the investment general partner will cease reporting for Country Edge, LP subsequentintends to Marchcontinue to monitor the deferred maintenance repairs and occupancy levels at the property. All real estate tax and insurance payments are current. On December 31, 2012.2011, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Butler Estates A L.D.H.A.

 

Grandview Apartments, LP (Grandview Apts.) is a 36-unit property located in Fargo, North Dakota. In 2011, average occupancy remained at 95%Occupancy averaged 93% in 2012 and the property operated above breakeven. Operating expenses increased in 2011 as a result of higher administrative and maintenance costs. Despite a weak local economy and a large supply of affordable housing in Fargo, ND, Grandview Apartments maintained high occupancy through the third quarter of 2011. However, occupancy dipped in the fourth quarter of 2011, finishing at 83% on December 31. Occupancy remained at 83%to 94% as of March 31, 2012. Maintenance costs were high in 2011 due to a storm in July that caused shingle and siding damage.2013. The repairs were paid out of operations and an insurance claim was filed. All insurance proceeds have been received and the property operated above breakeven for the year 2012, including the required replacement reserve deposits. Other revenue was reduced substantially from 2011 to 2012 as result of the $23,000 in insurance proceeds that the Operating Partnership realized in 2011. Operating expenses were reduced by $12,000 in 2012 as result of savings in maintenance and administrative costs. These savings helped to offset the $7,000 increase in insurance premiums. The investmentoperating general partner continuesconfirmed the increase in the insurance premium was a result of storms which struck the Fargo area in previous years. Real estate taxes increased significantly in 2012, as this project is located in a redevelopment area which has increased valuation assessments to monitorsubsidize local infrastructure enhancements. The property has continued to operate at breakeven through the property’s leasing strategies and physical improvements to ensure steps are being taken to enhance marketability.first quarter of 2013. Revenue has grown slightly as a result of a $20 per unit rental rate increase. The operating general partner continues to fund all deficits as operations are supported by an unlimited guarantee. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes, and insurance are current.current through March 31, 2013. On December 31, 2011, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Grandview Apartments, LP. As the property has stabilized and is now operating above breakeven, the investment general partner will cease reporting for Grandview Apartments, LP subsequent to March 31, 2013.

Lake Apartments IV Limited Partnership (Lake Apartments IV) is a 24-unit property located in Fargo, ND. InPhysical occupancy averaged 93% in 2011, average95% in 2012, and 94% through the first quarter of 2013. The strengthened occupancy was 93%has increased revenue, but has not been sufficient enough to offset the property’s high operating costs. The property operated below breakeven in 2012 and the property operatedcontinues to operate below breakeven. Low occupancy and high administrative andbreakeven through the first quarter of 2013. In 2012, overall maintenance expenses adversely impacted operations. There is a large supply of affordable rental communities in the market and a limited pool of qualified residents. As of March 31, 2012, physical occupancy had improved to 100%. Maintenance costs were high due to a storm in July 20112012 that caused shingle and siding damage. The repairs were paid out offunded from operations and an insurance claim was filed. All insurance proceeds have been received. The operating general partner continues to fund all deficits as operations are supported by an unlimited guarantee. The investment general partner will continue to monitor operations and assist management in improving leasing efforts and reducing operating expenses. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes, and insurance are current. On December 31, 2010, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Lake Apartments IV Limited Partnership.

Lake Apartments V Limited Partnership (Lake Apartments V) is a 24-unit property located in Fargo, ND. Occupancy at the property averaged 92% in 2011. The improved occupancy helped operations, but the property continued to operate below breakeven for the year. Management stated the increase in 2011 operating costs was attributableOperating expenses were slightly higher than budget due to unit turnover. As of March 31, 2012, physical occupancy was 92%, with the property operating at breakeven.turnover costs and increased insurance premiums and real estate taxes. The operating general partner continues to fund all deficits as operations are supported by an unlimited guarantee. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes, and insurance are current.current through March 31, 2013. On December 31, 2010, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respectexpired.

In March 2013, the operating general partner of Lake Apartments IV LP approved an agreement to sell the property to an unaffiliated entity and the transaction is scheduled to close in July 2013. The sales price for the property is $1,000,000, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $525,805 and estimated cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $212,363. Of the estimated proceeds to be received by the investment partnership, $31,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of approximately $175,863 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution.

Lake Apartments V Limited Partnership.Partnership (Lake Apartments V) is a 24-unit property located in Fargo, ND. Physical occupancy averaged 92% and 96% in 2011 and 2012, respectively and increased to 100% as of March 31, 2013. The increased occupancy improved operations, but the property continued to operate below breakeven in 2012 and through the first quarter of 2013. Maintenance expenses remain high due to unit turnover costs. Insurance premiums increased significantly in 2012 due to claims filed for hail storm damages incurred in the prior year. Real estate taxes also increased significantly in 2012. The operating general partner continues to fund all deficits as operations are supported by an unlimited guarantee. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes, and insurance are current through March 31, 2013. On December 31, 2010, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired.

In March 2013, the operating general partner of Lake Apartments V LP approved an agreement to sell the property to an unaffiliated entity and the transaction is scheduled to close in July 2013. The sales price for the property is $1,000,000, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $502,097 and estimated cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $355,054. Of the estimated proceeds to be received by the investment partnership, $31,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of approximately $318,554 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution.

 

Maxton Green Associates Limited Partnership (Carolina Pines Apartments) is a 32-unit development in Maxton, NC. The property operated below breakeven in 2008 and 2009 with occupancy averaging 92% and 88%, respectively. The decrease in occupancy in 2009 was primarily due to evictions of several problematic tenants atIn 2011 the property thatexperienced a deficit caused unit damages. Security deposits were not refunded on those units and the funds were used to subsidize the cost of repairs. Tenants were held responsible for all additionalby high maintenance costs and a third party collection agency was utilizeddrop in occupancy to collect what the deposits did not cover. To address problem tenants and unit damages, management implemented quarterly unit inspections to ensure that tenants are maintaining units properly. In 2010, average occupancy increased to 93% and91%. Year-end 2012 operations were above breakeven because Rural Development allowed the property operated above breakeven due to higher revenuesreimburse maintenance expenses with funds from the replacement reserve account. In addition, overall operating expenses decreased, mainly because the property was employing two maintenance staff members in 2011 with one in training and lower maintenance expenses. Throughdropped down to one staff member in 2012. Despite the fourth quarterimprovement in operations, occupancy remained low with an average of 2011, occupancy averaged 91%86%. Occupancy decreased inBy the first quarter of 20122013, operations were back below breakeven due to 84%, andhigh maintenance expenses associated with the aging of the property, continuesand occupancy dropped to operated below breakeven.84% and revenue remained low. Finding qualified tenants in the small rural area has been a challenge for management. Out of 32 units, 5 do not have rental assistance and are difficult to occupy. In order to improveincrease occupancy, at the property, management has placedbeen running newspaper advertisements, contactedads in local and extended areas, placing fliers around the community, sending outreach letters to various agencies, and posted fliersworking closely with HUD to move in the community.more Section 8 voucher holders. In addition, they have begun to offer resident referrals fees to residents who refer a new tenant, and leasing concessions to attract new residents. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2011.

 

In December 2010, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Bradley Phase I, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,362,945 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $427,597. Of the proceeds received, $3,700 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $10,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $413,897 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $413,897 as of December 31, 2010. In addition, the investment partnership received $153,712 that was contingent upon several factors including timely completion of a minor rehabilitation on June 25, 2012. The additional proceeds were returned to cash reserves.

In December 2010, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Bradley Phase II, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $785,259 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $247,532. Of the proceeds received, $1,200 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $10,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $236,332 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $236,332 as of December 31, 2010. In addition, the investment partnership received $95,056 that was contingent upon several factors including timely completion of a minor rehabilitation on June 25, 2012. The additional proceeds were returned to cash reserves.

 

In December 2010, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Butler St./Hanover Towers, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $3,019,407 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $819,441. Of the total proceeds received, $7,704 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $10,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $801,737 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $801,737 as of December 31, 2010. In addition, the investment partnership received $289,475 that was contingent upon several factors including timely completion of a minor rehabilitation on June 25, 2012. The additional proceeds were returned to cash reserves.

T.R. Bobb Apartments Partnership, A L.D.H.A. (T.R. Bobb Apartments) is a 30-unit property in New Iberia, Louisiana. In 2010, occupancy averaged 75% and2012 the property operated with a cash flow deficit. Totalbelow breakeven due to low occupancy and high operating expenses were 13% overexpenses.  Occupancy averaged 81% in 2012, but ended the prior year state average despiteat 97%.  In 2012 the property had a 23% reduction in maintenance costs. In 2011expenditures and a 57% increase in administrative expenditures. The increase in administrative expense was caused in part by significant legal expenses incurred in the property operated below breakeven with a cash flowfourth quarter of 2012. These expenses include the legal cost of seven evictions as well as residual expenses from third quarter evictions. The deficit of ($57,164). Occupancy remained at 75% on average forwas funded by deferring related party management fees and by the year.operating general partner advancing funds to the Operating Partnership. As of March 31, 2012,2013, the property is 87% occupied. The investment general partner intends to continue to monitor the property until operations stabilize. Thewas 86% occupied and was operating slightly above breakeven.   All mortgage, real estate tax, and insurance payments are current. The low-incomeOn December 31, 2011, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2011.with respect to T.R. Bobb Apartments Partnership, A L.D.H.A.

 

In January 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Liberty Village, LP to a non-affiliated entity for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,691,405 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $50,843. Of the total proceeds received, $1,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,101 will bewas paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $44,242 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $44,242 as of January 31, 2012.

 

In January 2012, the investment general partner transferred 50% of its interest in Little Valley Estates, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $548,864 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $1. Of the total proceeds received, $1 was returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The remaining 50% investment limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership is scheduled to bewas transferred in January 2013 for the assumption of approximately $548,865 of the remaining outstanding mortgage balance and anticipated cash proceeds of $0. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $1 as of January 31, 2012. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment limited partnership entered into an agreement with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment, if any. Under the terms of the residual agreement if the property owned by the Operating Partnership is refinanced or sold, on or before December 18, 2013, and cash proceeds are paid to the Operating Partnership as a result of such refinance or sale, there will be a payment of cash proceeds distributable to the investment limited partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partnership transferred its interest.

In January 2012, the investment general partner transferred 50% of its interest in Tremont Station LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $552,029 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $1. Of the total proceeds received, $1 was returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The remaining 50% investment limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership is scheduled to bewas transferred in January 2013 for the assumption of approximately $552,028 of the remaining outstanding mortgage balance and anticipated cash proceeds of $0. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $1 as of January 31, 2012. In addition, the investment general partner, on behalf of the investment limited partnership, entered into an agreement with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment, if any. Under the terms of the residual agreement, if the property owned by the Operating Partnership is refinanced or sold, on or before December 18, 2013, and cash proceeds are paid to the Operating Partnership as a result of such refinance or sale, there will be a payment of cash proceeds distributable to the investment limited partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partnership transferred its interest.

 

In July 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Edgewood Estates LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $551,073 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $14,668. Of the total proceeds received, $5,668 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $2,625 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $6,375 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $6,375 as of September 30, 2012. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership entered into a residual receipt promissory note (the RRN) with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the RRN, if there is a capital transaction involving the property owned by the Operating Partnership at any time within 15 years from the initial transfer date, there would be a residual payment distributable to the investment partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partner transferred its interest. The investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership also executed a Transfer and Assignment of Mineral Rights preserving the investment partnership’s right to any potential proceeds that may be distributed from production of minerals at the property.

In July 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in The Willows to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,052,508 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $12,030. Of the total proceeds received, $3,030 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $2,625 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $6,375 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $6,375 as of September 30, 2012. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership entered into a residual receipt promissory note (the RRN) with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the RRN, if there is a capital transaction involving the property owned by the Operating Partnership at any time within 15 years from the initial transfer date, there would be a residual payment distributable to the investment partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partner transferred its interest. The investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership also executed a Transfer and Assignment of Mineral Rights preserving the investment partnership’s right to any potential proceeds that may be distributed from production of minerals at the property.

In August 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Decro Nordhoff Apartments LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,846,531 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $2,501. Of the total proceeds received, $2,500 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $1 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $1 as of September 30, 2012.

In September 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Mosby Forest LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $484,330 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $33,000. Of the total proceeds received, $3,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $29,500 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $29,500 as of September 30, 2012.

In November 2012, the investment general partners of Series 26, Series 32 and Series 45 transferred 50% of their respective interests in 200 East Avenue Associates LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $4,118,291 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $1,772, $1,449 and $5,442 for Series 26, Series 32 and Series 45, respectively. Of the total proceeds received $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $1,772, $1,449 and $442 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 26, Series 32 and Series 45, respectively. The remaining 50% investment limited partner interests in the Operating Partnership is scheduled to be transferred in December 2013 for the assumption of approximately $4,118,291 of the remaining outstanding mortgage balance and anticipated cash proceeds of $8,662. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $1,772, $1,449 and $442 for Series 26, Series 32 and Series 45, respectively, as of December 31, 2012.

In November 2012, the operating general partner of SG Hazeltine LP entered into an agreement to sell the property to a non-affiliated third party buyer and the transaction closed on December 28, 2012. The sales price of the property was $3,419,640, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,204,952 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $1,033,039. Of the total proceeds received by the investment partnership, $6,555 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $1,026,484 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $1,026,484 as of December 31, 2012. In February 2013, the investment partnership received additional proceeds for its share of the Operating Partnership’s cash in the amount of $58,923 which were returned to the cash reserves held by Series 26.

In December 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Escher SRO Project to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,940,198 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $350,000. Of the total proceeds received, $10,400 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $339,600 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 26. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. The buyer executed a Post Transfer Compliance and Indemnity Agreement indemnifying Series 26 in the event of recapture. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $339,600 as of December 31, 2012.

Brookhaven Apartments Partnership, A Louisiana Partnership (Brookhaven Apartments) is a 35-unit property located in Shreveport, Louisiana. In 2012, the property averaged 99% occupancy but high operating expenses resulted in below breakeven operations. The increase in operating costs was partially due to a 25% increase in management fees in 2012. The operating general partner resumed direct management of the property as of January 2013. The increase in management fees during 2012 was associated with the prior management firm and the increase of the fees are expected to be less in 2013 under the direct management of the operating general partner. In addition, the tax and insurance expenses increased by 16% and 18%, respectively, in 2012. The operating general partner has stated that the tax increase was a result of a parish-wide tax rate increase which was instituted as a means to raise tax revenue due to the weak local economy. The increase in insurance expenses was a result of an annual increase to the operating general partner’s umbrella policy premium. The umbrella policy premium has increased in 2012 due to several wind related claims submitted in the prior year. As of March 31, 2013, occupancy was 99% and the property continued to operate at a deficit. The operating general partner has stated that the projected 2013 deficit will be funded by deferring management fees and, if necessary, funds will be advanced to the Operating Partnership. All mortgage, tax, and insurance payments are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2011.

(Series 27). As of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 1513 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

 

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the series, in total, generated $(1,833,449)$(1,983,012) and $(2,736,351)$(1,833,449), respectively, respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.04 for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 27 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(273,280)$416,424 and $(1,035,645)$(273,280), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of lossesincome from Operating Partnerships, miscellaneous income, and the fund management fee, and impairment losses.fee.

In March 2012, the operating general partner of Holly Heights Apartments, LP (Holly Heights Apartments) is a 30-unit property located in Storm Lake, Iowa. The property had occupancy of 98% as of March 31, 2012. Despite average occupancy of 93% in 2011 and expenses in line with state averages,entered into an agreement to sell the property has continued to incur operating deficits due to low rental rates coupled with a high interest ratenon-affiliated entity and the transaction closed on the permanent mortgage. Management has presented the loan to various lenders in the hope of refinancing but the net operating incomeAugust 28, 2012. The sales price of the property cannot support a loan large enoughwas $510,000, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $446,116 and cash proceeds to take out the existing debt. The management company,investment partnership of $60,000. Of the total proceeds received by the investment partnership, $52,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,500 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. There were no remaining proceeds from the sale returned to cash reserves held by Series 27. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating general partner, is deferringexpenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all fees until operations improve. The operating general partner discontinued funding deficitsoutstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the fourth quarterOperating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of 2008. Ataccounting, had previously reduced the endinvestment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of first quarterthe Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer has been recorded. In December 2012, the 2008-2010 real estate taxesinvestment partnership received additional proceeds for its share of the Operating Partnership’s cash in the amount of $33,818 remained unpaid. Also, the mortgage matured on April 18, 2012 and has not been extended. Property taxes in Iowa are paid in semi-annual installments$11,619, which were used to pay reporting fees due in Septemberto an affiliate of the same year and March of the following year. Real estate taxes become delinquent if not paid by April 1 of the year following the year of the tax bill. A tax sale occurs on the third Monday of June of the year following the year of the tax bill. This occurred on June 21, 2010. One year and nine-months after the tax sale occurs, a warning is sent to the property owner stating that they have 90 days to pay taxes plus interest accrued before a tax sale deed is created. Ninety days after the warning the property is given to the tax sale holder, as long as the paperwork is completed and the redemption occurred. The operating general partner, who is not believed to be able to get financing, has no plans to secure new debt in order to pay off the existing mortgage. He is instead focused on selling the property and using the proceeds to pay off the debt. The investment general partner will continue to work with the operating general partner to resolve the real estate tax and mortgage loan issues. The insurance payments are current. The low-income housing tax credit compliance period ends on December 31, 2012.partnership.

 

Angelou Court (Angelou Court Apts.) is a 23-unit co-op property in Harlem, New York. Winn Residential became the managing agent effective October 1, 2010. Tenant receivables are an issue that has historically plagued the project. However, in 2010, the property made substantial progress collecting prior as well as current tenant receivables. Winn Management has implemented an aggressivea stringent rent collection policy and is workingcontinues to work with attorneys to follow up on all past cases that were allowed to lapse. The resulting increase in cash flow allowedlapsed under prior management companies. In 2012 the property to reportoperated slightly abovebelow breakeven, operations in 2010. Overall, the property’s performance declined significantly in 2011. A 26% increase in operating costs causedand the property to operate atincurred a deficit of ($30,889). Replacement reserves were1,354) cash deficit. Even though the property was fully fundedoccupied in accordance with2012, high operating expenses resulted in the Partnership Agreement.below breakeven results. Total 2012 operating expenses increased 26% over 2011 results. The increase in operating costs wasinsurance expense increased by $14,000 due to a $6,000 increase in administrative expenses, a $15,000 increase in utilitythe operating general partner switching insurance carriers during the year and paying the premium on two equivalent policies. In 2012, tenant receivables declined slightly by $1,000 but remained high at $14,716. Account payables decreased by $33,000 but accrued expenses and a $20,000 increase in maintenance expenses. Theaccrued management fees remained high. Through the first quarter of 2013 occupancy remained at 100%, and the property funded deficits through withdrawing from replacement reserves, withdrawing from tax and insurance escrow, and accruing asset management and partnership management fees. Theoperating below breakeven. Management has confirmed that the mortgage, taxes and insurance are current through the first quarter of 2012, with occupancy ending at 100% as of March 31, 2012. The property is real estate tax exempt. Angelou operated slightly below breakeven according to management’s March 31, 2012 quarterly report. The investment general partner met with Winn Management in January of 2012 to review the 2012 operating budget and initiatives. Management implemented a 3% rent increase effective in the first quarter of 2012. The operating general partner has formally addressed all maintenance issues that were raised during the investment general partner’s 2011 site visit.2013. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2013.

Lake Apartments II Limited Partnership (Lake Apartments II) is a 24-unit property located in Fargo, ND.  In 2011, occupancy averaged 90% and2012 the property operated below breakeven. Management remains diligentbreakeven, with a ($2,700) deficit.  Occupancy improved from the 90% average in marketing the2011, to a 98% average in 2012.  This resulted in approximately $12,000 of additional rental income in 2012.  Total operating expenses were reduced by $4,000 in 2012, largely due to reductions in administrative and maintenance expenses, which helped to offset increases in real estate taxes and property through on-line ads, fliers and billboards. As of March 31, 2012, physical occupancy was 100%.insurance.  The replacement reserves were fully funded in 2012.  The operating general partner states thatsubsidized the extremely harsh weather duringshortfall with a $6,800 advance to the past winter increased grounds, maintenance, and snow removal costs.Operating Partnership. The property has continued to operate below breakeven in the first quarter of 2013.  Physical occupancy is averaging 99% as of March 31, 2013. The operating general partner continues to fund all deficits as operations are supported by an unlimited guarantee.  The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes, and insurance are current.current through March 31, 2013.  On December 31, 2010, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Lake Apartments II, Limited Partnership.

In March 2013, the operating general partner of Lake Apartments II LP approved an agreement to sell the property to an unaffiliated entity and the transaction is scheduled to close in July 2013. The sales price for the property is $1,000,000, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $497,617 and estimated cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $364,470. Of the estimated proceeds to be received by the investment partnership, $31,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of approximately $327,970 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 27. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution.

In December 2010, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Harbor LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $7,528,742 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $1,658,582. Of the total proceeds received, $10,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $10,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $1,638,582 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 27. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to $2,321,435. Accordingly, a loss on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $(682,853) as of December 31, 2010. In addition, the investment partnership received $575,945 that was contingent upon several factors including timely completion of a minor rehabilitation on June 25, 2012. The additional proceeds were returned to cash reserves.

Kiehl Partners, LP (Park Crest Apartments) is a 216-unit family property located in Sherwood, AR. Despite ending the first quarteroccupancy of 74% as of December 31, 2012, at 79% occupied, the property continued to operate above breakeven for the year due to favorable low floating ratefloating-rate financing. ReplacementThe property suffered from staffing shortages during 2012 but has since hired a new manager, assistant manager and maintenance supervisor. In 2011, pressure by neighboring homeowners forced management to construct a fence surrounding the property. This reduced the replacement reserves continueby $40,000 and left a shortage of available funds to turn the vacant units. Management received approval for a special replacement reserve request of $15,000 from the loan servicer in January 2013. The additional funds were utilized to turn 43 units since January, increasing occupancy to 78% through March 2013. A new leasing agent was hired in April 2013 to help fill the recently turned units and the property was 83% leased through April. Management works closely with the housing authority, which continues to be fully funded. During the third quartergreat source of 2011 the property sustained fire damage. The fire was caused when a plug-in air freshener overheated and ignited a sofa in an apartment unit. No one was injured as a result of the fire and the resident was relocated to another unittraffic at the property. RepairsManagement is advertising in The Apartment Guide and using leasing banners to draw prospects into the unit are completeproperty. The property is offering a 50% reduction from the first month’s rent for new tenants. The city water department conducted an inspection in 2013, and the City of Sherwood issued a Certificate of Occupancy in December 2011. It should be noted that the property has been subject to ongoing Fair Housing Claims by residents. There was also a slip and fall claim by a resident that has been referred tomust install cutoff valves at each building in the event of leaks. The operating general partner’s insurance carrier.partner is in the process of obtaining bids and estimates that the work will be completed in 2013. All mortgage, tax and insurance payments are current.current through March 31, 2013. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2013.

C.R. Housing Limited Partnership (The Casa Rosa) is a 97-unit family property in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Despite the fact that all residents are receiving Section 8 rental assistance, the property operated below breakeven in 2011 due to insufficient rental rates, high operating expenses and high debt service. After averaging 94% occupancy in 2011, the property averaged 93% occupancy through March 2013. The property continues to operate below breakeven due to insufficient rental rates, high operating expenses and high debt service. Management petitioned for a $7 rent increase in 2012 and 2013, but has been denied. High electric utility costs and maintenance expenses continue to hinder performance. Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, the sole provider of electricity, is estimated to have raised rates 72% in each of the last two years. Without an alternative, and because electricity is included in the rent, the property has been forced to absorb the increases without the ability to pass along the costs in the form of a rent increase to its residents. Due to the age and design of the two buildings, whereby common kitchens and bathrooms serve multiple resident units and are heavily used, constant repair and maintenance is required, particularly to the plumbing infrastructure. Also, the elevator serving building one is in a constant state of disrepair due to the costs of service and the lack of replacement parts. The company that originally installed and serviced the elevator is no longer in business and there are no other vendors operating on the island. As a result, service calls and requests for parts are routed either to the United States or Canada, which inflates the expense of routine service calls. The real estate taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current on the property through March 31, 2013. On December 31, 2013, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period will expire with respect to C.R. Housing, Limited Partnership.

In December 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Harrisonville Heights LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $930,083 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $7,154. Of the total proceeds received, $114 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $757 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $6,283 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 27. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $6,283 as of December 31, 2012.

 

(Series 28). As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100% and 100%, respectively.. The series had a total of 2420 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

 

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the series, in total, generated $(295,324)$(1,727,632) and $(1,570,564)$(295,324), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

 

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 28 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

 

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(266,396)$145,521 and $(286,909)$(266,396), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income from Operating Partnerships, miscellaneous income, and the fund management fee.

Fairway II LDHA, (Fairway Apartments II) is a 48-unit family property located in Marlette, MI. Occupancy averaged 88% in 2011, but ended the year at 81%. Management explained that the decrease in occupancy was caused by the eviction of numerous problem tenants. Due to the property’s history of vandalism and drug related activity with residents, management thought it was necessary to tighten their tenant qualification standards. Management reported that finding quality tenants has been difficult, but they are processing new applicants for move-in. The site manager believes that at the very minimum tenants should occupy 44 out of the 48 units, as these 44 apartments are subsidized. Despite the increase in vacancy in the third and fourth quarters of 2011, the property operated above breakeven for the year. Occupancy was at 90% as of March 31, 2012, and the property was operating above breakeven through the first quarter of 2012. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are all current through December 31, 2011. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2012.

 

Maplewood Apartments Partnership (Maplewood Apartments) is a 40-unit property located in Winnfield, Louisiana. In 2009,A management change was made at the property averaged 74% occupancy and operated below breakeven. The investment general partner conducted a site visit in MarchApril 2010 to assess the physical condition of the property and to interview management. During the site visit, the investment general partner identified major deferred maintenance issues and fourteen vacant units that had not been turned over. Inin an effort to improve operations. Property operations at the property, the investment general partner approved a management change which was finalized in April 2010. The new management company has a strong track record of managing properties in this region and they made an immediate positive impact on operations. The operating general partner made a request for reserve funds in order to pay for the turnover of the vacant units in need of major repair. According to the operating general partner, all of these repairs were completed by October 15, 2010. In addition, they completed repairs to major cracks in the drives and walkways throughout the property. They also replaced 170 feet of sewer mainhave significantly improved under the property. In total,new management; however, operations remain slightly below breakeven through the managing agent spent $60,000 over the second halffirst quarter of 2010 to address deferred maintenance at the property and to ensure that all units were rent ready. As a result of their efforts, occupancy improved to 98% as of December 31, 2010. Occupancy reached 100% in March 2011, then fluctuated in the summer months of 2011 due to the loss of Section 8 vouchers by several tenants, and finally ended the year at 98%.2013. Management is workinghas worked with the local Housing and Urban Development field office to obtain moreadditional vouchers should they become available. Management has also started advertising to attract new qualified tenants. In 2011increase occupancy. Outreach marketing includes fliers to local businesses, churches, and social service providers. Additionally, leasing specials were advertised in local newspapers in the property operated below breakeven with a cash flow deficit of ($22,025). This is an improvement over prior year. Occupancy increased from an average of 73%first quarter. Average occupancy was 97% in 2010 to 90% in 2011, ending the year at 98%. As2012 and as of March 31, 2012,2013, the property is 100%was 95% occupied. Under new management, the property is better positioned to stabilize in 2012. The operating general partner's guarantee is unlimitedpartner has stated that all deficits in time2013 will be funded by deferring related party management fees and, amount.if necessary, funds will be advanced to the Operating Partnership. All real estatemortgage, tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2013.

1374 Boston Road, LP (1374 Boston Road) is a 15-unit property in the Bronx, New York. In 2003,The operating general partner has had a history of ignoring the terms of the Operating Partnership recorded a $112,000 loan fromAgreement, yet believes that he is in compliance with it. In 2003, the operating general partner recorded a loan for $112,000 to pay forcover a tax lien. Further investigation showed that the tax lien was incurred during the construction period. As a result,Rather than the loan should have been funded bybeing subordinate, the operating general partner without reimbursement, as part of his obligationwas making reimbursements back to complete construction of the property according to the Operating Partnership agreement and the development agreement.himself. The investment general partner’s repeated requests to restructure the loan went unheeded.were ignored. In September 2005, legal counsel for the investment general partner sent a letter demanding a removal of the loan from the Operating Partnership account and the return of all payments made on this loan. The operating general partner’s response failed to address the issue satisfactorily. Additionally, in December 2005, a title search on the Operating Partnership showed at least $60,000 in liens that were never reported to the investment general partner. The investment general partner evaluated what the impact of removing the operating general partner would be since these lien issues remain unresolved. The investment general partner has decided against proceeding due to the inadequate value of the property based on size and location, as well as the operating general partner's continued funding, neither of which supports an extended legal battle for removal. Management has been unresponsive in providing regular reporting.reporting and in October 2012 management was not present or responsive for the scheduled 2012 investment general partner site inspection. Sporadic occupancy reports show occupancy averaging 80% for 2010May 2011, March 2012 and 2011. AccordingDecember 2012. Reporting continues to be an ongoing issue but the 2010 and 2011 audit and first quarter 2012 unaudited financial statement report the property operated withis operating above breakeven operations.breakeven. The first mortgage was fully paid off as of December 31, 2010. The second mortgage maturesmatured in December 2012. Based on a review of the 2011 audit, it appears as though $3,000 is outstanding to make the mortgage current. There is insufficient operating cash to cover payables. However, the operating general partner continues to fund deficits. The investment general partner has not received any occupancy or financial reporting for firstthe second or third quarter in 2012. TheA demand notice for missing information was sent to the operating general partner requesting monthly reporting and updates on the maintenance and operations of the property. Despite the investment general partner’s non-receipt of any quarterly reports, the operating general partner responded stating that he has been sending reports to the investment general partner and did not elaborate on property has a tax abatement which will expire in 2028.operations. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2011.

Yale Village, LP (Yale Village Apartments) is an 8-unit property in Yale, OK. Throughout 2010, occupancy was at 100%. Operating expenses were 15% above the state average, but the property still managed to generate cash flow for the year. In 2011, overall operating expenses increased even more. Maintenance expenses were particularly high due to staircase replacements on the property that were expensed in 2011. The property was not be reimbursed by the replacement reserve account due to Rural Development regulations. Also due to Rural Development restrictions, the property is required to contract out all maintenance work at a higher cost instead of using affiliated company employees. Despite an average occupancy of 94% in 2011, and 100% as of March 31, 2012, high maintenance expenses caused operations to fall below breakeven. The property has generated cash flow through the first quarter of 2012 as maintenance expenses have decreased. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as needed. The property’s mortgage, real estate taxes, and insurance payments are all current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2012.

Blanchard Partnership, A LA Partnership (Blanchard Place II) is a 32-unit complex in Shreveport, LA. In 2009, occupancy averaged 80% and the property operated below breakeven. Poor management brought about deferred maintenance, and problems with resident retention. In April 2010, the investment general partner approved an operating general partner transfer in an effort to improve operations. The incoming operating general partner has the experience, personnel, and systems in place needed to bolster occupancy, increase resident retention, and address five years of deferred maintenance. Management continues to focus on leasing and marketing, and requires that the site manager and supervisor submit a written rent-up plan for review by senior management. Occupancy increased in 2010 and 2011, to an average of 96% for both years. Through the first quarter of 2012, occupancy has averaged 93%, with current occupancy at 94% as of March 31, 2012. While operations have improved since the operating general partner transfer, the property continues to operate below breakeven due to high maintenance expenses as management continues to address five years of deferred maintenance at the property. The operating general partner states that they expect maintenance expenses to continue to decrease as the amount of deferred maintenance at the site has decreased. The investment general partner will continue to monitor occupancy and expenses at the site, and will continue to work with the new operating general partner until operations stabilize. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2012.

Athens Partners, LP (Park Village Apartments) is an 80-unit family property located in Athens, TN. Through the first quarter of 2012, the property continued to operate above breakeven. Park Village ended the first quarter of 2012 with 93% physical occupancy. During 2011 the property sustained wind damage caused by severe thunderstorms. No residents were displaced as a result of the wind damage and the repairs were completed to the property in November 2011. All mortgage, tax and insurance payments are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2013. As the property has stabilized and is now operating above breakeven, the investment general partner will cease reporting for Athens Partners, LP subsequent to March 31, 2012.

 

In January 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Milton Senior LP to a non-affiliated entity for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,167,648 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $35,099. Of the total proceeds received, $3,840 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,070 will bewas paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $26,189 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 28. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $26,189 as of January 31, 2012.

In January 2012, the operating general partner of Clubview Partners entered into an agreement to sell the property to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner and the transaction closed on March 1, 2012. The sales price of the property was $3,500,000, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $3,404,135 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $13,805. Of the total proceeds received by the investment partnership, $2,935 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $10,870 will bewere returned to cash reserves held by Series 28. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale has been recorded in the amount of $10,870 as of March 31, 2012.

In July 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Evangeline Partnership to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $929,592 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $32,200. Of the total proceeds received, $23,200 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $2,625 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $6,375 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 28. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer has been recorded in the amount of $6,375 as of September 30, 2012. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership entered into a residual receipt promissory note (the RRN) with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the RRN, if there is a capital transaction involving the property owned by the Operating Partnership at any time within 15 years from the initial transfer date, there would be a residual payment distributable to the investment partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partner transferred its interest. The investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership also executed a Transfer and Assignment of Mineral Rights preserving the investment partnership’s right to any potential proceeds that may be distributed from production of minerals at the property.

In July 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Ashberry Manor, Limited to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $689,877 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $20,000. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $15,000 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 28. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer has been recorded in the amount of $15,000 as of September 30, 2012. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership entered into a residual receipt promissory note (the RRN) with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the RRN, if there is a capital transaction involving the property owned by the Operating Partnership at any time within 5 years from the initial transfer date, there would be a residual payment distributable to the investment partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment general partner transferred its interest.

In August 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Tilghman Square LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $643,875 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $27,500. Of the total proceeds received, $600 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $3,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $23,400 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 28. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer has been recorded in the amount of $23,400 as of September 30, 2012.

In January 2013, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Cottonwood Partnership, A LA Partnership in Commendam to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $687,538 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $30,600. Of the total proceeds received, $19,200 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $2,625 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $8,775 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 28. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer has been recorded in the amount of $8,775 as of March 31, 2013. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership entered into a residual receipt promissory note (the RRN) with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the RRN, if there is a capital transaction involving the property owned by the Operating Partnership at any time within 15 years from the initial transfer date, there would be a residual payment distributable to the investment partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partner transferred its interest. The investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership also executed a Transfer and Assignment of Mineral Rights preserving the investment partnership’s right to any potential proceeds that may be distributed from production of minerals at the property.

In May 2013, the investment general partner transferred 49% of its interest in Sumner House LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $122,500. Of the total proceeds received, $65,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,500 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $50,000 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 28. The remaining 51% investment limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership is scheduled to be transferred no later than June 2017 pending lender approval for anticipated cash proceeds of $127,500, which will be returned to the cash reserves held by Series 28. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution.

(Series 29). As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 99.2% and 99.2%, respectively. The series had a total of 21 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, 20 of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

 

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 20102011 the series, in total, generated $(407,539)$(1,878,927) and $(2,006,046)$(407,539), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 and $0.01, respectively,for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 29 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

 

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(299,048)$(445,991) and $(376,809)$(299,048), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of losses from Operating Partnerships and the fund management fee.

 

Collins Housing Limited Partnership (The Meadows Apartments) is a 36-unit, family property located in Collins, Mississippi. The property operated below breakeven in 2011 primarily due to lowCollins Housing ended the first quarter of 2013 at 75% physical occupancy. As of March 31, 2012, the occupancy was at 69%. Due to weak and declining economic conditions, which began in 2010 and have continued through the first quarter of 2012,into 2013, many employers have either closed or significantly reduced employee hours. Because a large portion of the tenant base is composed of hourly-wage employees, evictions and move outsmove-outs have increased. Management reported that residents who are no longer able to afford their rent continue to move back in with friends or family. Due to the property’s rural location, traffic has been limited. Management has been aggressively marketing the community by distributing fliers throughout the area and having brightly colored directional signage installed. Additionally, a tenant referral program and move-in specials are being offered.

 

During the first quarter of 2012 the property sustained fire damage, resulting fromwhich occurred when a fire which started in a resident’s kitchen. The resident was cooking on the stove and left their unit to do some shopping. The food eventually ignited and causedstove on unattended. No one was injured but the fire. The fire spread through the attic and caused significant damage. No one was injured as a result of the fire. All displaced residents temporarily relocated temporarily to live with family or moved into vacant units at the property. The cost to repair the damage iswill be approximately $342,814$345,000 and will be covered entirely by insurance proceeds. Management is awaitingAs of June 30, 2012 the resultdemolition associated with the repairs had been completed. In May 2012, the operating general partner submitted a tax credit application and in October of three separate repair estimates, as required by Rural Development.2012 tax credits were awarded. All the units must be placed in service before December 31, 2014 to avoid recapture. The operating general partner does not anticipate having any difficultly meeting that deadline. The mortgage payments, taxes, insurance and accounts payable are all current. On December 12, 2012, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period will expireexpired with respect forto The Meadows Apartments.

Lombard Partners, LP (Lombard Heights Apts.), located in Springfield, Missouri, operated below breakeven starting in 2005. The property suffered from ineffective management, which led to poor physical condition and low occupancy. Average occupancy was 72%, 47% and 70%, respectively, in 2005, 2006 and 2007. In the first quarter of 2007, the investment general partner learned that the property was five months in arrears on its mortgage and that the lender had issued a notice of default. The lender replaced on-site management with a third-party management company at the end of the second quarter of 2007.  To stabilize the property, the lender depleted the replacement reserve account to fund unit turnovers, which improved occupancy to the mid-90%s. The investment general partner and the lender discussed a possible workout, which included replenishing the reserves and paying down the outstanding mortgage. In December 2007, the lender polled the bondholders for their preference in resolving the default. They were given the options of foreclosure sale, 18-month debt forbearance as part of a workout plan, or refinancing the property. On June 30, 2008 the lender notified the investment general partner that the bondholders had approved proceeding with a foreclosure sale. The property was sold on July 31, 2008 for $772,800. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain from the sale of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.

As a result of the foreclosure, the Operating Partnership lost remaining credits of $47,840. The investment general partner has determined that the new owner will not continue to operate the property as a Section 42 property. As a result, the Operating Partnership also experienced recapture and interest of $199,516. This represents a loss of tax credits, and recapture and interest of $12 and $49, respectively, per 1,000 BACs. The investment general partner has started to pursue the guarantors under the guaranty with a view to recovering the investment general partner’s losses. Counsel recently resolved jurisdictional issues and is now pursuing the guarantors in Massachusetts. Additionally, the operating general partner’s attorney withdrew as counsel in September 2009. While the individual guarantors have the option of representing themselves, the court ordered the operating general partner’s ownership entity to obtain new counsel and file a notice of appearance by November 6, 2009, which it did not do. This failure to comply with the court order now exposesexposed the defendants to the risk of sanctions up to and including a default judgment. The investment general partner's counsel filed a motion for sanctions with the court in December 2009 that led to the scheduling of a court hearing on this matter in May 2010. In late May 2010, the court granted the investment general partner’s motion for sanctions. The hearing on the sanctions occurred on January 31, 2011. On March 30, 2011 the court approved a damages judgment of $389,043, plus legal costs and interest of $29,726. This developmentdecision likely increases the chance of some recovery from the guarantors; however, the size of that recovery is difficult to predict since the guarantors’ financial situation is unknown to the investment general partner at this time. partner.

As a follow up to the judgment rendered by the Massachusetts court, counsel for the investment general partner filed a motion “in aid of judgment” in mid-April 2011 requesting that the court authorize him to depose the defendants regarding their current financial situation and their ability to pay the aforementioned judgment. A ruling on this motion was expected by the end of the second quarter of 2011; however, that did not occur as a result of local Missouri counsel not filing the petition to register the judgment until October 6, 2011. In late December 2011, the attorney for the operating general partner and the guarantors filed a motion to squashquash the aforementioned deposition. This motion was subsequently withdrawn by the attorney for the guarantors on January 12, 2012. On February 28, 2012, new counsel for the operating general partner filed a motion in Missouri to quash the deposition and to stay enforcement of the Massachusetts judgment. On March 1, 2012, the Missouri Court approved the aforementioned motion. This sent the case back to the Massachusetts court to correct the original judgment. A hearing is now scheduled inOn May 21, 2012, the Massachusetts court indenied the operating general partner’s motion for relief from judgment and amended the judgment previously entered. At the end of the second quarter of 2012, counsel for the investment general partner was notified by counsel for the operating general partner that it intends to file an appeal of the May 2012. It is now uncertain when21, 2012 ruling. On June 20, 2012, the Missouri court lifted its stay and authorized commencement of post-judgment discovery.

Counsel for the investment general partner took a deposition of the operating general partner/guarantorpartner on August 8, 2012 in an effort to ascertain whether the operating general partner has the financial capacity to pay the judgment and penalties that have been awarded to date. Based on information revealed during the deposition, it appears that the operating general partner has been depleting its assets via transfers of assets to various family members. Counsel for the investment general partner filed a petition in Missouri Circuit Court on October 30, 2012 arguing that the aforementioned asset transfers were fraudulent, notifying the transferees that the assets they received from the guarantors were transferred to them fraudulently, and requesting that the subject transfers be voided. In late December 2012, the guarantors filed a motion with the court denying that the conveyance of assets was fraudulent. Counsel for the investment general partner responded in early January 2013 by requesting documentation on the asset transfers and explanations from the guarantors as to why the transfers were not fraudulent in nature under the Missouri Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. The defendant filed an appeal of the judgment in Massachusetts Court on January 22, 2013, the last day permitted for filing such an appeal. On March 7, 2013, counsel for the investment general partner filed its appeal brief with the Massachusetts Court. A hearing on the appeal will occur.be held in the fall 2013. According to counsel for the investment general partner, judges in Massachusetts take six months on average to issue their ruling following an appeal hearing. In September 2012, counsel for the investment general partner proposed a settlement equal to the judgment amount (waiving legal fees and interest penalties) to counsel for the operating general partner; this offer was not accepted. To date, the parties have beenremain unable to agree on the appropriatesuitable size of a settlement.

Bryson Apartments, Limited Partnership (Pecan Hill Apartments) is a 16-unit development located in Bryson, TX, which has a population of approximately 500. With only 16 units, the occupancy at the property fluctuates significantly when only two or three units become vacant. Through the fourthfirst quarter of 2011, the property was 91% occupied and was operating at breakeven. In the first quarter 2012,2013, occupancy continues to be strong at 92%averaged 85% and the property is operatingoperated with a slight deficit. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as necessary. The mortgage, taxes and insurance are all current. On December 31, 2012, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period will expireexpired with respect to Bryson Apartments, Limited Partnership.

 

Northfield Apartments III, LPL.P. (Willow Point Apartments III) is a 120-unit property located in Jackson, Mississippi. Through the first quarter of 2012, theThe property continued to operate below breakeven through the first quarter 2013 due to low occupancy, high operating expenses, insufficient rental rates and high maintenance and utility expenses. Occupancy trended downward in 2011, butburdensome debt service. Although occupancy decreased slightly to 83% at month end March 2013, the property still maintained anaverage for the first quarter of 2013 was 86%, slightly above the 2012 average occupancy of 90%83%. According to management, resident skips and eviction for non-payment of rent remain problematic. The tenant base has a large hourly-wage employee component and the year. Management noted that manyweak job market has resulted in a continued reduction of hours. Additionally, management struggles to stabilize occupancy because the move-outs were residents who movedJackson market is saturated with newer affordable units at comparable rents. Consequently, to remain competitive, rents have been adjusted downward by $82, $178 and $152 below the maximum allowable rates on one, two and three bedroom units, respectively. The constant tenant turnover has resulted in during the $99 move-in promotioncontinuous maintenance and were unable to make timely rental payments. Occupancy continued to trend downward in 2012 as average occupancy for the quarter ending March 31, 2012 was 83%. Maintenance expenses have remained high as management continues to turn vacant units. Additionally,repair costs. In addition, the property is older and many fixtures require repair and replacement on a consistent basis; therefore high maintenancebasis. Maintenance expenses are expected to negatively impact the property for the foreseeable future. DuringOperating expenses are also adversely impacted by the third quarter of 2011,high water rates charged by the water company in Jackson, MS. The investment general partner conducted a site visitcontinues bi-weekly communication with the operating general partner to inspect the physical condition of the property, analyze the local marketdiscuss operations and interview the property management team. While the management team appeared qualified for the role, the property is tired and shows signs of wear. Further, the Jackson market is saturated with affordable units and the property faces competition from newer affordable communities.

occupancy concerns. All mortgage, real estate taxes and insurance payments are current as of March 31, 2012. However, during the third quarter of 2011, the lender had to advance funds to pay delinquent 2010 real estate taxes. Real estate taxes for 2011 totaling approximately $59,000, which were due on February 1, 2012, were not paid. The lender may be unwilling to advance additional funds to pay the 2011 real estate taxes and the operating general partner, who is not under an operating deficit guaranty, has limited capacity to fund deficits.2013. The 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period with respect to Northfield Apartments III, LP will expireexpired on December 31, 2012. However, if the property is foreclosed in 2012, the estimated tax credit recapture cost and interest penalty of $173,404 is equivalent to recapture and interest of $43 per 1,000 BACs.

Forest Hill Apartments, L.P. (The Arbors) is an 85-unit senior property located in Richmond, VA. Through the fourth quarter of 2011,In 2012, the property operated with an average physical occupancy of 87%. However, occupancy declined significantly during the fourth quarter.89%, a 2% increase from 2011. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2011,2013, the property’s physical occupancy was 72%92%. In December 2009, Forest Hill leased 20 units to residents that were displaced by a fire at a nearby senior property with HUD subsidized rents. As of the third quarter 2011, repairs had been completed on the damaged property and it was leasing again. Many of the residents that were relocated to Forest Hill in 2009 returned to their former property in late 2011, causing an occupancy issue at Forest Hill. Forest Hill continued to operate below breakeven in 2011 due in large part to the ongoing vacancy challenges. The management company, an affiliate of the operating general partner, appearshas focused on marketing initiativesand community outreach in order to increase applicant traffic andtraffic. The operating general partner stated that concessions have been the driving force behind the sustained increase in occupancy. PhysicalHowever, even with the concessions, the improved occupancy improved slightly to 87% as of March 31, 2012. However,has resulted in the property still operated belowoperating slightly above breakeven duringin the first quarter of 2012.2013. Recently, the operating general partner informed the investment general partner that a housing discrimination complaint that was filed by an evicted tenant was settled with no findings, and that a separate trespassing lawsuit filed by another tenant was dropped. Management believes the property will maintain breakeven or better operations in 2013. The mortgage, real estate taxes, and property insurance escrowspayments are current. The operating general partner continues to fund all operating deficits as necessary. On December 31, 2013, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period will expire with respect to Forest Hill Apartments II, LP.

Kiehl Partners, LP (Park Crest Apartments) is a 216-unit family property located in Sherwood, AR. Despite ending the first quarteroccupancy of 74% as of December 31, 2012, at 79% occupied, the property continued to operate above breakeven for the year due to favorable low floating ratefloating-rate financing. ReplacementThe property suffered from staffing shortages during 2012 but has since hired a new manager, assistant manager and maintenance supervisor. In 2011, pressure by neighboring homeowners forced management to construct a fence surrounding the property. This reduced the replacement reserves continueby $40,000 and left a shortage of available funds to turn the vacant units. Management received approval for a special replacement reserve request of $15,000 from the loan servicer in January 2013. The additional funds were utilized to turn 43 units since January, increasing occupancy to 78% through March 2013. A new leasing agent was hired in April 2013 to help fill the recently turned units and the property was 83% leased through April. Management works closely with the housing authority, which continues to be fully funded. During the third quartergreat source of 2011 the property sustained fire damage. The fire was caused when a plug-in air freshener overheated and ignited a sofa in an apartment unit. No one was injured as a result of the fire and the resident was relocated to another unittraffic at the property. RepairsManagement is advertising in The Apartment Guide and using leasing banners to draw prospects into the unit are completeproperty. The property is offering a 50% reduction from the first month’s rent for new tenants. The city water department conducted an inspection in 2013, and the City of Sherwood issued a Certificate of Occupancy in December 2011. It should be noted that the property has been subject to ongoing Fair Housing Claims by residents. There was also a slip and fall claim by a resident that has been referred tomust install cutoff valves at each building in the event of leaks. The operating general partner’s insurance carrier.partner is in the process of obtaining bids and estimates that the work will be completed in 2013. All mortgage, tax and insurance payments are current.current through March 31, 2013. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2013.

 

Westfield Apartments Partnership (Westfield Apartments) is a 40-unit developmentproperty located in Welsh, Louisiana. OccupancyIn 2012, the property averaged 85%72% occupancy and 74%operated at a deficit. Marketing includes the distribution of fliers to local businesses and advertising in 2009area newspapers. The operating general partner attributed the lack of qualified applicants to the economic downturn but stated new companies and 2010, respectively. In 2011, occupancy decreased furtheremployment opportunities are slowly returning to average 68% for the year. However, in the fourth quarter, occupancy started to stabilize and reached 80% by year-end 2011 and was 78% asarea. As of March 31, 2012.

2013, occupancy was 85%. However, the property has continued to operate at a deficit. The property operated with a cash deficit in both 2010 and 2011 due to low revenues and fluctuating expenses. The investmentoperating general partner has stated that the projected 2013 deficit will complete a site visit in 2012be funded by deferring management fees and, if necessary, funds will be advanced to inspect for potential deferred maintenance issues at the site due to significantly reduced maintenance expenses from prior years.Operating Partnership. All real estatemortgage, tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current. The 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2013.

Palmetto Place Apartments Partnership, A LA Partnership (Palmetto Place Apartments) is a 40-unit property located in Benton, Louisiana. In 2012, the property averaged 98% occupancy but high operating expenses resulted in below breakeven operations. The high operating expenses consisted of a large increase in maintenance expenses, mostly contract labor costs, and an increase in administrative expense, largely in salary. The maintenance expense increase was caused by the repair of deferred maintenance items. The expense should be reduced in 2013. Also, the operating general partner resumed direct management of the property as of January 2013, which should help lower costs. The property was previously managed by a third party that had unsuccessfully attempted to purchase the property. When the sale fell through, management shifted back the operating general partner’s affiliated management company. As of March 31, 2013, occupancy was 99% and the property continued to operate at a deficit. The operating general partner has stated that the projected 2013 deficit will expirebe funded by deferring management fees and, if necessary, funds will be advanced to the Operating Partnership. All mortgage, tax, and insurance payments are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2013.

 

(Series 30). As of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 1716 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

 

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the series, in total, generated $(804,507)$(436,171) and $(1,776,275)$(804,507), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 and $0.04, respectively,for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

 

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 30 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

 

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(187,318)$(99,836) and $(161,274)$(187,318), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income from Operating Partnerships and the fund management fee, and impairment losses.fee.

Bellwood Four LP (Whistle Stop Apartments) is a 28-unit complex in Gentry, Arkansas. Occupancy hasThe property is operating below breakeven due to historically been low at the property,occupancy as it is in a result of its very rural area withlocation yielding limited rental demand. Average occupancy was 76%77% in 2011. 20112012, but increased in December to 93%, and from January to March 2013, average occupancy was particularly low as management94%. The operating general partner attributes the increased evictions for non-payment of rent. The property is operating slightly above breakeven with 89% occupancy as of March 2012. The recent increase in occupancy is due to a seasonalnew on-site manager that is more attentive to property needs and issues. It is expected that this upward trend that the property has experienced each of the past three years.is sustainable and rental rates will follow suit over time. In an effort to increase occupancy, management continues to run advertisements in local media outlets and distributesdistribute fliers in adjacent towns in hopes of attracting qualified tenants. Management has an ongoing dialogue with the local Department of Housing ansand Urban Development office seeking new residents and aid for current residents who have difficulty making rent payments.paying rent. Management notes that Gentry is not as desirable as nearby Shiloam Springs, and that the local applicant pool consists primarily of food factory employees, most of whom exceed income qualifications. As a rental incentive, management continues to offer two months of free electricity. In an effort to minimize expenses, property management completes as many work orders as possible in-house. It should also be noted that the operating general partner has recently obtained approval from the investment general partner to restructure and extend the maturity date of the current $300,000 mortgage loan from June 1, 2013 to April 1, 2018. Property performance should marginally improve as the new loan terms are more favorable and will reduce annual debt service. Furthermore, the loan with the Arkansas Development Finance Authority is currently in default due to the Operating Partnership’s inability to fund principal and interest payments commencing on June 1, 2012 due to insufficient cash flow. The mortgage, taxesoperating general partner intends to restructure the ADFA loan after closing the above loan extension. Taxes and insurance are current. On December 31, 2012, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period will expireexpired with respect to Bellwood Four LP.

JMC, LLC (Farwell Mills Apts.) is a 27-unit property in Lisbon, ME. The property continued to operate below breakeven inthrough the first quarter of 20122013 due to a droplow occupancy in occupancy to 85%,January 2013, high concession loss, turnover costs, seasonal operating expenses, and required improvements to the property. Occupancy declined asrebounded from 81% in January 2013 to 96% in March 2013 due primarily to concessions of one month’s free rent in January and a $299 move-in special in February and March. Since the property lost a total of $2,835 to concessions and occupancy is strong, management evicted residents for non-payment of rent. Management is working diligently to increase leasing by havingwill no longer offer these concessions in the site accept and process applications rather than the corporate office.second quarter. In the first quarter, the property’s website was revamped and re-launched. Management continues to advertise the property twice a week on Craigslist and in newspapers in the towns directly surrounding the property. Given the occupancy increase, management began advertisinghas a rent increase planned for April 1, 2013, which will increase gross potential rent by $5,052 annually. To retain residents, management plans on creating a mini-basketball court in Apartments 24-7, a more affordable and interactive online advertising venue, and started offering a move-in specialthe common area of the first month freeparking lot for the many families that have moved in. The property suffered from excessive heating and $299 applied towardsnow removal costs due to a harsh winter. These seasonal operating expenses are expected to normalize in the security deposit.second quarter. Due to the age of the property, management continues to make a number of necessary improvements during unit turns. These items cannot be reimbursed from the replacement reserve as the reserve has been depleted. To offset high maintenance expenses, management plans on implementing a 2.5% rent increase effective April 1, 2012.and repairs. The operating general partner funds cash deficits by deferring fees owed to hisaffiliated management and maintenance companies. All tax, insurance, and mortgage payments are current. The operating general partner’s operating deficit guarantee, capped at $400,000, expires in July 2013. On December 31, 2012, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period will expireexpired with respect to JMC, LLC.

 

Linden Partners II (Western Trails Apartments II) is a 30-unit property located in Council Bluffs, IA. Average occupancy declined from 95% in 2010 toOccupancy averaged 91% in 2011. Management attributed2012 and operated at a deficit of ($1,700). Occupancy at the drop in occupancyproperty increased to flooding concerns93% through March 2013. As the rental market in the Council Bluffs and Carter Lake section of Iowa. As severe flooding continued through early 2011, Pottawattamie County leaders declared a disaster on May 31, 2011, resulting in evacuations, voluntary power outages and road closures. Many residents of Council Bluffs chosesurrounding area continues to live with family members out of state or at nearby properties not threatened by a levee break along the Missouri River. Althoughbe competitive, the property is outsidecurrently offering one free month of rent with a 12 month lease or the 100-year floodplaininstallation of a washer and was not affected by local flooding, management saw a significant declinedryer, which will remain in traffic in 2011. As the threat of flooding has subsided, traffic has rebounded and occupancy improvedunit upon move-out. Management continues to 100% in March 2012. As a result,work on attracting more qualified prospects, but as the property is operating above breakeven throughages, this remains an ongoing challenge. Operating expenses have remained stable during the first quarter of 2013 and management has implemented a $20 per unit rental increase upon lease renewal. In February 2012, the HOME loan was amended to defer principal and interest payments until the fourth quarter of 2012. The amended agreement called for $9,353 payable in the fourth quarter of 2012, $10,304 on August 15, 2013, $11,250 on August 15, 2014 and the remaining principal balance of $165,111 on August 15, 2015. The operating general partner has received a verbal approval to defer the 2012 Home Loan Payment of $9,353 until 2013, but the operating general partner has still not received any written documentation noting the extension. Deficits are funded through general partner advances. The taxes, insurance, and mortgage payments are all current.current through March 31, 2013. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2013.

In September 2012, the investment general partner of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV LP – Series 30 and Series 34, respectively, transferred their interests in Millwood Park LP (Millwood Park Apartments) is a 172-unit family property in Douglasville, Georgia. Historically, the property has struggled in this highly competitive market. Management utilizes move-in specials and increased advertising with local businesses and rental guides. As part of the Operating Partnership restructuring in June of 2008, the new operating general partner agreed to extend the expiring operating deficit guarantee through September 2011. Deficits have been and continue to be largely funded by operating general partner advances along with accruing management fees. The investment general partner found the property to be in good physical condition during a site inspection in January 2012. In 2010 and 2011 the property operated below breakeven primarily due to high operating expenses, bad debt, high vacancy losses, and a burdensome debt service.

During 2011, occupancy averaged 89%, although it declined to an average of 81% for the fourth quarter of 2011. During the first quarter of 2012 occupancy started to improve averaging 85% for the quarter and ending at 87% at March 31, 2012. The property continued to operate significantly below breakeven in 2011 and the first quarter of 2012. The property continues to offer the $99 move-in special alongentity affiliated with reduced rental rates of $599 for two-bedroom units and $695 for three-bedroom units. Management also offers complimentary carpet steam clean and touch up painting to all current residents that renew within 30 days of the lease expiration date. The operating general partner hired a third party consultant to formulate a new marketing plan during the third quarter of 2010. This plan was still in effect through the first quarter of 2012.

The property manager resigned effective March 1, 2011 and the assistant property manager was promoted. The new property manager continues to focus on resident retention efforts by hosting monthly tenant birthday gatherings, lease renewal parties, crime awareness meetings, and an after school program. The private security company continues to have a positive impact as crime at the property has decreased. Management will continue to fund the private security operations with the hope that the decrease in home invasions will have a residual effect on surrounding community violence, increasing property appeal and occupancy. A new maintenance supervisor was hired in May 2011. The operating general partner hired a new regional director of operations in the fourth quarter to oversee its Georgia portfolio. The operating general partner has funded all operating deficits through 2011 and the first quarter of 2012. In January 2012, the operating general partner informedfor its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $6,929,737 and nominal consideration to the investment general partner that its ability and/or willingnesspartnerships. There are no cash proceeds to continuebe returned to fundcash reserves held by Series 30 and Series 34, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating deficits for the remainderexpenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the compliance period wouldinvestment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be severely limited. Both parties are discussing scenarios to assess additional funding sources for 2012 and beyond. The operating general partner continues to have regular conversations withdistributed based on the lender about re-structuringnumber of BACs held by each investor at the existing mortgage debt; however, no definitive plan has been offeredtime of distribution. As the annual losses generated by the lender. AllOperating Partnership had previously reduced the investment partnership’s tax insurance,basis carrying value to zero, no gain or loss was recognized by the investment partnership as a result of the transfer. In addition, the buyer executed a Post Transfer Compliance and mortgage payments are current asIndemnity Agreement and a Guaranty Agreement indemnifying Series 30 and Series 34, respectively, in the event of March 31, 2012. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2014. If the property is foreclosed in 2012, the estimated tax credit recapture cost and interest penalty of $333,404 is equivalent to tax credit recapture and interest of $123 per 1,000 BACs.recapture.

 

In December 2010, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Byam, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $722,105 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $163,641. Of the total proceeds received, $2,300 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $10,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $151,341 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 30. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $151,341 as of December 31, 2010. In addition, the investment partnership received $72,943 that was contingent upon several factors including timely completion of a minor rehabilitation on June 25, 2012. The additional proceeds were returned to cash reserves.

Hillside Terrace Associates, LP (Hillside Terrace Apartments) is a 64-unit property in Poughkeepsie, NY. In the first quarter ofDuring 2012, the property operated around breakeven, andproperty's occupancy averaged 100%. Operating expenses were high, but the property was still able to generate cash. While the property’s operations are stable, the property encountered a problem with its septic system’s leeching field. Since its installation in 2000-2001, the field has failed to perform in a consistent manner. As a result, management initiated a program to pump the system monthly. Over the years, the pumping has occurred more frequently due to flooding in the field. In an effort to temporarily reduce the flooding and associated pumping costs, the property has effectively reduced its flow rate by utilizing conservation methods including low-flow faucets and front loading washing machines. As a more permanent solution, the investment general partner and the operating general partner began negotiationsnegotiated with the abutting property owner to connect to its sewer system. The negotiation bogged down in late 2011 dueone-time cost to an unrelated conflict betweenconnect to the abuttersystem was paid utilizing funds from the operating reserve account, the operating account, replacement reserves, and the Town of Poughkeepsie. As of the first quarter of 2012, the conflict has been resolved and negotiations are continuing. The investment general partner intends to continue to work with management andadvances from the operating general partner to remedy the failed septic system. Another issue was that the Operating Partnership underfunded its operating reserve account per the terms of the lender’s regulatory agreement. This technically represents an event of default, which could result in demanding immediate full payment of the loan. Based on history with the lender, management does not believe the loan will be called. The investment limited partner will work with theand investment general partner on soliciting a loan covenant waiver to ensure thatpartner. The use of all reserve funds was approved by the mortgage will not be called.state agency and lender. Construction completed in March 2013. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2014. As the property has stabilized and is now operating above breakeven, the investment general partner will cease reporting for Hillside Terrace Associates, LP subsequent to March 31, 2013.

Jeffries Associates Limited Partnership (New River Gardens) is a 48-unit property located in Radford, Virginia. In 2012, the property operated below breakeven and lost $(5,844) in cash. Below breakeven operations in 2012 were primarily caused by depressed occupancy as the property averaged 84% occupancy for the year. An ineffectual site manager was removed during the third quarter of 2012 and the regional manager operated the property (with the assistant manager) through the end of 2012 at which time occupancy began to improve. A new site manager was hired during the first quarter of 2013, and occupancy has continued to improve. As of March 31, 2013, the property was 98% occupied. The improved occupancy can also be attributed to the continued use of a USDA-RD approved leasing incentive equal to one month free rent that was implemented in May 2012. Going forward, the leasing incentive will remain necessary to maintain high occupancy given the historically soft rental market in this rural community. Despite the marked improvement in occupancy, the property continued to operate slightly below breakeven during the first quarter of 2013 due to a combination of reduced rental income from the incentive, high administrative costs, and increased water and sewer costs. Salaries and payroll expenses will remain elevated as a new office has been established at the property; New River Gardens will no longer share personnel with a neighboring property. Management anticipates that the new office will help to keep occupancy high and control expenses. Water usage was higher than normal during the first quarter of 2013 and management is investigating the cause. Mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current.

 

(Series 31). As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 2625 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

 

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the series, in total, generated $(1,014,213)$(2,098,176) and $(1,522,805)$(1,014,213), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 and $0.01, respectively,for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

 

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 31 was $0 and $31,776, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method.$0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

 

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(391,897)$(173,701) and $(360,341)$(391,897), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, and impairment losses.

Canton Housing One, LP (Madison Heights Apartments) is an 80-unit property located in Canton, Mississippi. Occupancy was 79%71% at the end of the first quarter of 2012.2013. The property continues to experience increased turnover primarily due to evictions for non-payment of rent and skips. Maintenance costs remain high due to turnover. In addition, there were several gang-related incidents at or near the property in 2010.2012. Because of the gang activity, management hired a police officer to patrol the site and is working with the local police department to ensure extra patrols and support for the property. These actions have increased security at the site. Management has also taken several measures in its effort to increase occupancy. Advertisements have been placed in the local newspapers and management is offering move-in rental concessions. Further, arrangements were made to employ a full-time manager at the site and extra personnel have been hired to turn vacancies. As a result of low occupancy and high maintenance expenses, the property operated below breakeven in the first quarter of 2012.2013. All mortgage, insurance, and tax payments are current. On December 31, 2012, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period will expireexpired with respect to Canton Housing One, LP.

San Angelo Bent Tree, LP (San Angelo Bent TreeCanton Housing Two (Canton Village Apartments) is a 112-unit development42-unit property located in San Angelo, Texas.Canton, Mississippi. Occupancy was 88% at the end of the first quarter of 2013. The property experienced increased turnover primarily due to evictions for non-payment of rent and skips. The continued struggle with vacancy is a direct reflection of economic conditions in Canton, where ongoing job losses have led to increased evictions and migration from the area. In addition, there were several gang-related incidents at or near the property in 2012. Because of the gang activity, management hired a police officer to patrol the site and is working with the local police department to ensure extra patrols and support for the property. The police officer stays at Canton Housing One, a nearby property. Management has also taken several measures in its effort to increase occupancy. Management continues to focus marketing efforts on internet advertising. They also perform outreach to the local HUD office, the Mississippi Housing Authority, and the Madison County housing agencies. Advertisements have been placed in the local newspapers and management is offering move-in rental concessions. As a result of March 31, 2012,low occupancy, was 96% and the property operated above breakeven. Management’s marketing strategy focused on aggressive businessbelow breakeven in the first quarter of 2013. All mortgage, insurance, and community outreach programs coupled with print and on-line advertising. To promote resident retention and appeal to prospective residents, management organizes weekly social events and free monthly workshops for residents on various topics. To reduce utility expenses, management organizes informational seminars for residents on reducing consumption and puts out a monthly newsletter that outlines various energy conservation tips. The operating general partner continues to fund operating deficits as needed. All real estate tax mortgage, and insurance payments are current. On December 31, 2013,2012, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period will expireexpired with respect to San Angelo Bent Tree,Canton Housing Two, LP. As

Canton Housing Four, LP (Canton Manor Apartments) is a 32-unit property located in Canton, Mississippi. Occupancy was 78% at the end of the first quarter of 2013. The property continues to experience increased turnover primarily due to evictions for non-payment of rent and skips. The continued struggle with vacancy is a direct reflection of economic conditions in Canton, where ongoing job losses have led to increased evictions and migration from the area. In addition, there were several gang-related incidents at or near the property has stabilizedin 2012. Because of the gang activity, management hired a police officer to patrol the site and is now operating aboveworking with the local police department to ensure extra patrols and support for the property . The police officer stays at Canton Housing One, a nearby property. Management has also taken several measures in its effort to increase occupancy. Advertisements have been placed in the local newspapers and management is offering move-in rental concessions. As a result of low occupancy, the property operated below breakeven in the investment general partner will cease reporting for San Angelo Bent Tree, LP subsequentfirst quarter of 2013. All mortgage, insurance, and tax payments are current. On December 31, 2012, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to March 31, 2012.Canton Housing Four, LP.

 

Riverbend Housing Associates, LP (Riverbend Estates) is a 28-unit development in Biddeford, ME. The property continued to operate below breakeven through the first quarter of 20122013 as a result of low occupancy and high administrativeutility and maintenance expenses. AlthoughOccupancy remained low, ending March 2013 at 82%, due to a bed bug outbreak. A number of residents vacated because of the property averaged 86% occupancy inproblem. To remediate the bed bug issue, management signed a one year pest control contract. There were no more cases of bed bugs by the end of the first quarter of 2012, occupancy rebounded to 93% as of March 31, 2012. Occupancy increased as management began accepting tenants at lower income levels.2013. The majority of the rental applicants only satisfy the 30% and 40% area median income standard rather than the targeted 60% level. SinceManagement has therefore reduced the four remaining vacant units areincome requirement in order to improve occupancy. Additionally, the property’s website was revamped and re-launched. In an effort to retain residents, management will hold a BBQ in June and a new site manager is at the 60% level, management loweredproperty two days a week. In the 60% rentsfirst quarter of 2013, the property suffered from excessive heating and snow removal costs due to a harsh winter. Heating costs are typically high in the 40% rents since applicants cannot afford the 50% level. Management continues to reach out to the 25 peoplewinter months for two reasons. First, when residents turn on the waitlistheat in their units, the heat is automatically switched on in the hallways. Secondly, the outdoor temperature sensor that tells the hallway heat to determine what rent they can afford. Management advertises the property on websites such as Craig’s List and The Apartment Guide. They are also offering rental incentives including one month of free rent and $300 for resident referrals.turn off is broken. The property also suffered from high administrative and maintenancedoes not have the $10,000 it would cost to repair the system. These seasonal operating expenses as a resultare expected to normalize in the second quarter of evictions for non-payment of rent and appliance replacements due to the age of the property.2013. All tax, insurance, and mortgage payments are current. The operating general partner is responsible for funding operating deficits, capped at $300,000, through the end of the tax credit compliance period. The operating general partner funds cash deficits by deferring fees owed to his management and maintenance companies. On December 31, 2013, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period will expire with respect to Riverbend Housing Associates, LP.

Seagraves Apartments, L.P., A Texas Limited Partnership, (Western Hills Apartments) is a 16-unit family property in Ferris, TX. Occupancy decreasedTexas. Beginning in 2011, weak and declining economic conditions caused an increased number of skips and evictions for non-payment of rent. This trend resulted in the average annual occupancy decreasing to an average of 77% through 2011,in 2011. The reduced revenue and increased turnover expenses caused operations to decline to below breakeven for the property operatedyear. Although occupancy improved slightly to 79% in 2012, annual operations remained below breakeven. ThroughAccording to the first quarteroperating general partner, only 13 of 2012, average occupancy remains at 77%, with current occupancy being 81% as of March 31, 2012.the 16 total units offer rental assistance, and management has had difficulty finding qualified applicants who are able to afford the rent for the three units that do not offer rental assistance. The operating general partner states that ithopes to increase rents at $10-$20 per year on the units with rental assistance to achieve breakeven operations with only 13 units leased. Although this strategy will take time, USDA RD has become difficult to attract qualified applicants who can afford the rent because the property does not offer fullapproved 2013 rental assistance.rate increases of $13 per one bedroom units and $19 per two bedroom units. Management continues to market the property through advertisementsthe approved Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan. This plan consists of informational letters sent out biannually to local charity, church, and disability programs. Advertisements in local newspapers and fliers. While there has been an increase in traffic to the property, a number of applicants have failed the required criminal background check, and have been ineligible to reside at the property. The operating general partner continues to monitor occupancy and operations atmaintain exposure for the property and is currently considering offering a concessionalert potential residents to specials offered for available units throughout the year. Despite these efforts, occupancy remained low in the first quarter of a month’s rent2013, averaging 79%, and the property continued to qualified applicants.operate below breakeven. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits. Alldeficits and all real estate taxes, insurance, and mortgage payments are current. The investment general partner intends to continue to monitor occupancy and operations to ensure that occupancy rises above 90%, and the property returns to breakeven operations. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2014.

 

(Series 32).    As of March 31,In August 2012, and 2011, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 15 properties at March 31, 2012, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the series, in total, generated $(2,057,492) and $(3,889,255), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.01 and $0.14, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 32 was $0 and $52,794, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the net income (loss) of the series was $(341,661) and $(380,952), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income (losses) from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, and impairment losses.

In December 2010, the investment general partner soldtransferred its membership interestsinterest in Bradley Phase I of Massachusetts LLC, Bradley Phase II of Massachusetts LLC, Byam Village of Massachusetts LLC, Hanover Towers of Massachusetts LLC, Harbor Towers of Massachusetts LLC and Maple Hill of Massachusetts LLC. A gain on the sale of the membership interests has been recorded in the amount of $499,998 as of December 31, 2010.

In August 2010,San Angelo Bent Tree Apartments, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of FFLM Associates – Carriage Pointe entered into an agreement to sell the property to an unrelated third party buyer and the transaction closed on September 24, 2010. The sales price of the property was $775,000, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $115,914$2,294,384 and cash proceeds to the investment partnershipspartnership of $75,000 and $75,000 to Series 32 and Series 33, respectively.$118,230. Of the total proceeds received, $15,000$65,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and $15,000 from Series 32 and Series 33, respectively,$5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $60,000 and $60,000approximately $48,230 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 32 and Series 33, respectively.31. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the saletransfer of the Operating Partnership net of the overhead and expense reimbursement,proceeds from the transfer has been recorded in the amountsamount of $60,000 and $60,000 for Series 32 and Series 33, respectively,$48,230 as of September 30, 2010.2012.

(Series 32). As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 15 properties at March 31, 2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the series, in total, generated $(1,272,688) and $(2,057,492), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 and $0.01, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 32 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.


For the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(250,554) and $(341,661), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income (losses) from Operating Partnerships and the fund management fee.

Indiana Development, LP (Clear Creek Apartments) is a 64-unit development, located in North Manchester, Indiana. In the years prior to 2008, the property operated considerably below breakeven as a result of low occupancy and incurred significant cash deficits. During that period, the operating general partner, who does not have an affiliated management company, engaged five different management companies. In early 2008 in connection with a portfolio-wide debt restructuring, the operating general partner engaged the current third party management company to manage its portfolio of LIHTC properties including Clear Creek Apartments. This management company appearshas been more effective than any of the previous management firms and operations have moderately improved. For the quarter ending March 31, 2012, averageThe local economy in northern Indiana has improved slightly in recent years, but in general it remains weak. Average occupancy was 97%94% for the first quarter of 2013 compared to average occupancies of 96% and 93%97% reported for 2012 and 2011, and 2010, respectively. For the quarter ending March 31, 2012 the property generated net cash flow of approximately $9,000. Net cash flows expended from property operations totaled ($32,066) and ($23,707) in 2011 and 2010, respectively. Although the quality of the tenant base and physical occupancy have improved since 2009, administrative, maintenance and bad debt expenses remain high. Also, rentalRental rates have remainedrecently begun to increase due to the higher occupancy levels, but they remain at a reduced level in order to compete with other properties in the sub-market. The local economyproperty operated below breakeven in northern Indiana has improved slightly but overall remains weak. To date,the first quarter of 2013 primarily due to continued high maintenance and bad debt expenses. Net cash flows expended from property operations totaled ($52,402) and ($32,066) in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Negative operations have been financed by operating deficit advances from the operating general partner, has funded all operating deficits, althougheven though its unlimited operating deficit guaranteeguaranty expired in SeptemberJune 2004. The operating deficit advances provided by the operating general partner financedtotaled $52,907 and $41,123 in 2012 and 2011, respectively. In 2008, the operating deficitsgeneral partner entered into an $85,000 second mortgage note on behalf of $41,123the Operating Partnership with a lender other than the first mortgage lender. The second mortgage note was executed without the approval of either the investment general partner or the first mortgage lender. In October 2012 and $30,012again in 2011December 2012, the first mortgage lender communicated to the operating general partner that the second mortgage note was in violation of the first mortgage covenants and 2010, respectively.that the first mortgage lender was reserving its rights which include declaring an event of default. In late December 2012, the second mortgage note, which had a balance at the time of approximately $45,000, was paid in full from funds advanced by the operating general partner. The mortgage, tax and insurance payments are current as of March 31, 2012.

2013.

Parkside Plaza, L.P. (Parkside Plaza Apartments) is a 35-unit co-op property in Harlem, New York. The property operated below breakeven infrom 2005 2006, 2007, and 2008 due to high utility, maintenance and administrative expenses combined with collection loss. Operations improved to above breakeven status in 2009. Occupancy was 100% as of March 31, 2012. Due to high bad debt and operating expenses, the property operated slightly below breakeven in 2010. Excessive receivablereceivables and accounts payable continued to hinderimpact operations as the property operated significantly below breakeven in 2011. The deficit was funded by drawing down $46,000 of operating reserves in addition to accruing another $45,000 of payables. In their2012 the property operated above breakeven, generating $62,000 of surplus cash. In 2011 the property wrote off $83,705 in bad debt. Tenant receivables as of December 31, 2012 were $19,520, which represented a decrease of $9,000 over the tenant receivables at year-end 2011. Vendor payables decreased by $41,000 in 2012 over 2011, but accrued expenses still remain high. The first full calendar yearquarter unaudited financial statements reflect above breakeven operations. Occupancy remained at 100% as of managing operations, management was proactive in evicting delinquent tenants and raising the rents for new tenants, closer to the tax credit maximum. The investment general partner met with management in January 2012 to review the 2012March 31, 2013. Despite operating budget and initiatives. Management did implement rent increases averaging 3% in January 2012. The investment general partner plans to meet with managementexpenses slightly increasing during the second quarter of 2012 to discuss the timely payment of vendor invoices. This outstanding payables balance decreased from $78,000 at year end 2011 to $58,000 at the end of the first quarter 2012. Thefrom recognizing the annual audit expense, the strong occupancy at the property contributed to accretive net operating general partnerincome. Management has formally addressed all maintenance issuesconfirmed that were raised during the investment general partner’s 2011 site visit. The mortgage and insurance are current, through the first quarter and the property is tax exempt. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2015.

(Series 33).   As of March 31, 2012 and 2011 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 8 properties at March 31, 2012, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the series, in total, generated $(1,058,730) and $(1,858,275), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.02 and $0.11, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 33 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the net income (loss) of the Series was $(92,813) and $(241,815), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income (losses) from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, and impairment losses.

 

In August 2010,November 2012, the investment general partners of Series 26, Series 32 and Series 45 transferred 50% of their respective interests in 200 East Avenue Associates LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of FFLM Associates – Carriage Pointe entered into an agreement to sell the property to an unrelated third party buyer and the transaction closed on September 24, 2010. The sales price of the property was $775,000, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $115,914$4,118,291 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $75,000$1,772, $1,449 and $75,000 to$5,442 for Series 26, Series 32 and Series 33,45, respectively. Of the total proceeds received $15,000 and $15,000 from Series 32 and Series 33, respectively,$5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includesinclude third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $60,000$1,772, $1,449 and $60,000$442 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 26, Series 32 and Series 33,45, respectively. The remaining 50% investment limited partner interests in the Operating Partnership is scheduled to be transferred in December 2013 for the assumption of approximately $4,118,291 of the remaining outstanding mortgage balance and anticipated cash proceeds of $8,662. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’spartnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the saletransfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amountsamount of $60,000$1,772, $1,449 and $60,000$442 for Series 26, Series 32 and Series 33,45, respectively, as of September 30, 2010.December 31, 2012.

Pearl Partners, L.P. (Colony Park Apartments) is a 192-unit property located in Pearl, Mississippi. In 2012, the property averaged 93% occupancy and operated above breakeven. The property continued to operate above breakeven in the first quarter of 2013 and was 94% occupied as of March 31, 2013. On March 18, 2013, the property suffered structural damage caused by a severe hail and wind storm. No residents were injured or displaced, and no credit loss is anticipated. The operating general partner estimates that the damage will exceed its deductible amount and is working with the insurance carrier to file a claim and complete repairs. The investment limited partner intends to continue to closely monitor the repairs process. Mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current at the property.

Pecan Manor Apartments (Pecan Manor Apartments) is a 40-unit property located in Natchitoches, Louisiana. Despite the property averaging 99% occupancy in 2012, high operating expenses resulted in below breakeven operations. The operating general partner resumed direct management of the property as of January 2013. As of March 31, 2013, occupancy was 99% and the property continued to operate at a deficit. The operating general partner has stated that the projected 2013 deficit will be funded by deferring management fees and, if necessary, funds will be advanced to the Operating Partnership. All mortgage, tax, and insurance payments are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2013.

(Series 33). As of March 31, 2013 and 2012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 8 properties at March 31, 2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the series, in total, generated $(816,434) and $(1,058,730), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 and $0.02, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 33 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the net income (loss) of the Series was $(123,940) and $(92,813), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of income (losses) from Operating Partnerships and the fund management fee.

 

Merchants Court, LLLP (Merchants Court Apartments) is a 192-unit family property located in Dallas, GA. The property operatedcontinued to operate below breakeven through the first quarter of 2012 as a result of vacancy and concession loss and high maintenance expenses. At the close of the first quarter of 20122013; however, the property was 86% occupied.did see an increase in average occupancy to 98% for the quarter, 7% above the average reported for 2012. Management continues to offer a concession of one half offhas sharpened its marketing efforts by reducing the first month’s rent. Givenrent to a maximum of $350 and has increased awareness of the weak local economy, the concessions are necessaryproperty through mobile billboards. Resident skips and evictions for non-payment of rent have remained problematic, resulting in order to keep occupancy strong. Turnover remains a challenge for the property; each month several residents are forced to vacate units for non-payment. The high vacancy loss and bad debt expense. In addition, consistent turnover has caused maintenance expensescosts to remain high. Additionally, the vendor hiredIn order to turn the vacant units shut off the partnership’s account due to non-payment. However, management was successful in finding another vendor to complete the unit turns. To reducelimit turnover and improvereduce bad debt, management remains focused on building a strong resident profile. As such, a formal applicant approval process is in place, including landlord, credit, criminal and rental background checks. In addition, because Georgia is a tenant-friendly state, causing the resident base,eviction process to be lengthy, management changeduniformly issues eviction notices to all delinquent tenants on the resident referral program to increase the referral fee.

All mortgage and insurance payments are current assixth of March 31, 2012. The real estate taxes for this property of approximately $136,000 were delinquent as of March 31, 2012.each month. Although a third party collection agency is also engaged, success has been limited. The operating general partner is currently working on a plan to pay the real estate taxes. The operating general partner is also currently attempting to refinance the mortgage debt which has an interest rate of 7.85%, higher than current market rates. Per the. The operating general partner the lender verbally acknowledgedreports that it would waivewill be submitting a refinancing loan application package to an identified lender by the yield maintenance penaltyend of June 2013. The investment general partner intends to continue to monitor the progress of the refinance on thea weekly basis. All mortgage, note to facilitate a refinancing.

insurance and real estate tax payments are current as of March 31, 2013.

Stearns Assisted Housing Associates, LP (Stearns Assisted Housing) is a 20-unit senior property in Millinocket, ME. Despite strong occupancy of 100% as of March 31, 2012,2013, the property continued to operate at a deficit through the first quarter of 2012 due to high utility and maintenance expenses. Management indicated that even if occupancy were to stay at 100%, the property would not be able to support the high operating expenses. The high utility costs are directly related to the increased cost of fuel, coupled with an inefficient heating system.system, and greater heating demand during the winter months. Maintenance expenses also continued to be high in the first quarter due to costly HVAC repairs, as well as carpetcleaning of the drain and vinyl replacement.sewer lines, and seasonal snow-plowing. To offset the high expenses, management was grantedwill implement a $10$15 rent increase scheduledeffective May 1, 2013 for May 2012.the 11 non-voucher holders which will increase gross potential rent by $1,980 annually. The operating general partner’s operating deficit guaranty is unlimited in time and amount and he continues to fund cash deficits as necessary. All mortgage, tax and insurance payments are current.

Southaven Partners I, LP (Bradford Park Apartments) is a 208-unit family property located in Southaven, MS. The property operated above breakeven through the first quarter of 2012 and ended March 2012 with 99% occupancy. During 2011 the property sustained wind damage caused by severe thunderstorms and fire damage caused when lightning struck a satellite dish and started a fire on the roof of a building. At the close of the fourth quarter of 2011, all repair work was complete and in November a certificate of occupancy for the fire-damaged building was issued by the city of Southaven, MS. All mortgage, tax and insurance payments are current. As the property has stabilized and is now operating above breakeven, the investment general partner will cease reporting for Southaven Partners I, LP subsequent to March 31, 2012.

 

In October 2011, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Bradford Group Partners of Jefferson County, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $978,663 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $60,000. Of the total proceeds received, $30,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $8,434 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $21,566 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 33. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $21,566 as of December 31, 2011. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment partnership entered into a residual receipt promissory note (RRN)(the RRN) with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the RRN, if there is a capital transaction involving the property owned by the Operating Partnership at any time within 5 years from the expiration of the LIHTC Compliance Period on December 31, 2014, there will be a residual payment distributable to the investment partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partner transferred its interest.

(Series 34). As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 1413 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

 

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the series, in total, generated $(1,450,564)$(334,649) and $(1,349,972)$(1,450,564), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.00 and $0.19, respectively,for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 34 was $0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

 

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the Series was $(367,740)$(241,582) and $(996,746)$(367,740), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of losses from Operating Partnerships and the fund management fee, and impairment losses.fee.

 

Belmont Affordable Housing II, LP (Belmont Affordable Housing Two Apartments) is a 20-unit family scattered site rehabilitation property in West Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  The property operated below breakeven in 2010.  Turnover in 2010 led2011 due to higher maintenance and bad debthigh operating expenses.  Operating expenses along with significantly increased tenant accounts receivable.  The operating general partner attributed high maintenance costs to heating repairs, but also to the wear and tear that has occurred over the past twelve years.  The tenant profile has a history of damaging the units prior to move out.  The operating general partner has not provided occupancy reports since the second quarter of 2011, but a recent site visit conducted on October 7, 2011, indicated 100% occupancy at that time.  In 2011, operating expenses increasedapproximately $5,000 from the prior year due to taxes, professional fees, management fees, insurance, and compliance monitoring. Although there is stillwas a cash flow deficit, operations improved from 2010 with2010. The operating general partner has been unresponsive to various requests and questions from the annual deficit at ($28,975).investment general partner; specifically not addressing improvements to quarterly reporting as well as site visit follow up. A demand notice for missing information was sent to the operating general partner requesting monthly reporting and updates on the maintenance and operations of the property. The investment general partner sent the notice as a certified letter on January 3, 2013, and gave the operating general partner 30 days to respond. To date, quarterly financial and occupancy reporting remains outstanding. The mortgage, taxes and insurance are all current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2013.

 

HWY. 18 Partners, LP (Summer Park Apartments) is a 216-unit family property located in Jackson, MS. In 2012, the property closed the fourth quarter 75% occupied, with operations below breakeven. During the first quarter of 2013, occupancy remained at 75%, totaling 54 vacant units. Management continues to focus on getting vacant units ready for occupancy and leasing. Management has set an assertive goal of five move-ins per/week and is currently offering a reduced deposit of $99 and a 50% reduction on the first month’s rent. During the first quarter of 2013 there were 15 move-ins and 17 move-outs. Management continues to evict tenants for non-payment of rent but many tenants have been leaving the property due to the increased crime in the Jackson, MS area. There were three security related lawsuits against the property in 2012. The first two lawsuits were a result of the same incident involving an armed robbery at the property and were settled by the insurance company in April of 2013. The third lawsuit filed in February 2013, resulted from an alleged car robbery on the property premises. This case is also being handled by the Operating Partnership’s insurance carrier. An evaluation of a favorable or unfavorable outcome is not possible at this time. Damages awarded in this claim cannot exceed a $200,000 jurisdictional limit. Management does not expect a considerable increase in insurance premium as result of the settled or pending litigations. Management is looking to add security at the property but lacks sufficient funds to include in the 2013 budget. Management has requested bids from several security companies to determine if this additional cost can be supported by future operations. Currently, management has deployed additional patrols by the courtesy office and staff. Supplemental lighting has also been added to existing light poles and to the exterior of 14 buildings. Operating expenses continued to decrease during the first quarter of 2013 as much of the work needed to turn vacant units has been completed in-house. Two new maintenance directors were hired for the Ambling portfolio in Jackson. The maintenance directors will oversee the maintenance staffs at each property and provide additional resources to complete more work internally at a lower cost. A special replacement reserve withdrawal was approved by the lender and has helped pay down closed accounts with vendors and enabled management to turn vacant units quickly. All mortgage, insurance and real estate tax payments are current as of March 31, 2013 and the low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2014.

Merchants Court, LLLP (Merchants Court Apartments) is a 192-unit family property located in Dallas, GA. The property operatedcontinued to operate below breakeven through the first quarter of 2012 as a result of vacancy and concession loss and high maintenance expenses. At the close of the first quarter of 20122013; however, the property was 86% occupied.did see an increase in average occupancy to 98% for the quarter, 7% above the average reported for 2012. Management continues to offer a concession of one half offhas sharpened its marketing efforts by reducing the first month’s rent. Givenrent to a maximum of $350 and has increased awareness of the weak local economy, the concessions are necessaryproperty through mobile billboards. Resident skips and evictions for non-payment of rent have remained problematic, resulting in order to keep occupancy strong. Turnover remains a challenge for the property; each month several residents are forced to vacate units for non-payment. The high vacancy loss and bad debt expense. In addition, consistent turnover has caused maintenance expensescosts to remain high. Additionally, the vendor hiredIn order to turn the vacant units shut off the partnership’s account due to non-payment. However, management was successful in finding another vendor to complete the unit turns. To reducelimit turnover and improvereduce bad debt, management remains focused on building a strong resident profile. As such, a formal applicant approval process is in place, including landlord, credit, criminal and rental background checks. In addition, because Georgia is a tenant-friendly state, causing the resident base,eviction process to be lengthy, management changeduniformly issues eviction notices to all delinquent tenants on the resident referral program to increase the referral fee.

All mortgage and insurance payments are current assixth of March 31, 2012. The real estate taxes for this property of approximately $136,000 were delinquent as of March 31, 2012.each month. Although a third party collection agency is also engaged, success has been limited. The operating general partner is currently working on a plan to pay the real estate taxes. The operating general partner is also currently attempting to refinance the mortgage debt which has an interest rate of 7.85%, higher than current market rates. Per the. The operating general partner the lender verbally acknowledgedreports that it would waivewill be submitting a refinancing loan application package to an identified lender by the yield maintenance penaltyend of June 2013. The investment general partner intends to continue to monitor the progress of the refinance on thea weekly basis. All mortgage, note to facilitate a refinancing.insurance and real estate tax payments are current as of March 31, 2013.

 

RHP 96–I, LP (Hillside Club I Apartments) is a 56-unit property located in Petoskey, Michigan. In the years prior to 2008, Hillside Club I Apartments operated below breakeven as a result of low occupancy and incurred significant cash deficits. Also prior to 2008, the operating general partner, who does not have an affiliated management company, engaged several third party management companies to manage the property. In early 2008, in connection with a portfolio wideportfolio-wide restructuring, the operating general partner hired the current third party management company, who subsequently was able to make some improvements to property operations. Average occupancy forwas 93% in the first quarter of 2013; and 92% and 91% in 2012 was 88%, down slightly from recent years. Occupancy had improved moderately to average 91% and 90% for 2011, and 2010, respectively. Management is currently offeringhas improved occupancy in recent years through increased overall marketing efforts as well as implementing a reduced security deposit requirement as a leasing incentive has eliminatedand elimination of the application fee, and has increased overall marketing efforts.fee.

 

The local economy in northern Michigan has suffered over the last several years although it did begin to improve slightly in 2011. DuringProperty operations have also improved recently. The property operated at about breakeven in the first quarter of 2012,2013. This compared to net cash flow expended from property operations totaled approximatelytotaling ($6,000). During 2011, net cash flow expended from operations totaled10,586) and ($71,888) due toin 2012 and 2011, respectively. In 2012, the property experienced higher maintenance and bad debt expenses offset by higher rental income and lower real estate taxes (further discussed below). Negative operations were financed through increased payables. In 2011, the property suffered from increases in real estate taxes, utilities and maintenance expenses. Net cash flow expendedAs a result, negative operations in 2011 waswere funded through advances from the operating general partner and proceeds from a loan provided by the investment general partner (further discussed below. During 2010, net cash flow expended from property operations totaled ($15,613)below). The operating general partner’s unlimited operating deficit guarantee expired as of July 31, 2003.

On December 6, 2010 the Operating Partnership received a formal Default Noticedefault notice from itsthe first mortgage lender indicating a mortgage payment deficiency of $40,426. The first mortgage lender did continuecontinued to accept monthly mortgage payments through June 2011 during the period of the on-goingongoing mortgage default. On May 11, 2011 the Operating Partnership received an Eventevent of Default Noticedefault notice accelerating the full amount of the debt and triggering the accrual of default interest. In addition, the Operating Partnership’s 2010 PILOT payment of $31,697 was due to the local taxing authority by June 15, 2011.

 

On June 30, 2011 the investment general partner provided a loan of $78,448 from fund reserves to the Operating Partnership. From these funds, $46,751 was paid to the first mortgage lender to cure the mortgage default and $31,697 was paid to the taxing authority for the outstanding 2010 PILOT charge. The loan from the investment general partner bears interest at prime plus 1%, is payable from property cash flow by December 31, 2013, and is secured by the operating general partner’s general partner interest in the Operating Partnership as well as cash flows from the general partnership interest in Hillside Club II LDHA LP, an unaffiliated entity owningthat owns the adjacent, Phase II property.

 

The PILOT for Hillside Club I Apartments expired effectiveon December 31, 2010, resulting in an increase in real estate taxes from $31,697 in 2010 to $66,898 in 2011. On February 1, 2012, the lender issued a notice of default to the Operating Partnership because the real estate tax escrow did not have sufficient funds to pay the initial installment due to the taxing authority on February 14, 2012 of approximately $52,000. The lender subsequently used replacement reserves and other funds to make a protective advance to pay the initial real estate tax installment. On March 30, 2012, the operating general partner reached an installment payment agreement with the lender to repay the amount of the protective advance at the default rate and replenish the replacement reserves. The last payment installment to repay the protective advance was made by the operating general partner to the lender on April 30, 2012. In addition, the operating general partner reported that it had reached an agreement with the taxing authority to reduce the assessed value of the property so that real estate taxes would bewere reduced to approximately $42,000 in 2012.

The operating general partner is considering refinancing the first mortgage loan. If successful, the refinance is anticipated to occur late$34,000 in 2012. In addition, the operating general partnerAs of March 31, 2013, all mortgage, tax, and investment general partnerinsurance payments are exploring selling the property, along with Phase II, to a buyer who will continue to operate both properties in accordance with Section 42.current. The 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period with respect to RHP-I 96, LP expires on December 31, 2013. As of March 31, 2012, all mortgage, tax, and insurance payments are current.2014.

 

In September 2012, the investment general partner of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV LP – Series 30 and Series 34, respectively, transferred their interests in Millwood Park LP (Millwood Park Apartments) is a 172-unit family property in Douglasville, Georgia. Historically, the property has struggled in this highly competitive market. Management utilizes move-in specials and increased advertising with local businesses and rental guides. As part of the Operating Partnership restructuring in June of 2008, the new operating general partner agreed to extend the expiring operating deficit guarantee through September 2011. Deficits have been and continue to be largely funded by operating general partner advances along with accruing management fees. The investment general partner found the property to be in good physical condition during a site inspection in January 2012. In 2010 and 2011 the property operated below breakeven primarily due to high operating expenses, bad debt, high vacancy losses, and a burdensome debt service.

During 2011, occupancy averaged 89%, although it declined to an average of 81% for the fourth quarter of 2011. During the first quarter of 2012 occupancy started to improve averaging 85% for the quarter and ending at 87% at March 31, 2012. The property continued to operate significantly below breakeven in 2011 and the first quarter of 2012. The property continues to offer the $99 move-in special alongentity affiliated with reduced rental rates of $599 for two-bedroom units and $695 for three-bedroom units. Management also offers complimentary carpet steam clean and touch up painting to all current residents that renew within 30 days of the lease expiration date. The operating general partner hired a third party consultant to formulate a new marketing plan during the third quarter of 2010. This plan was still in effect through the fourth quarter of 2011.

The property manager resigned effective March 1, 2011 and the assistant property manager was promoted. The new property manager continues to focus on resident retention efforts by hosting monthly tenant birthday gatherings, lease renewal parties, crime awareness meetings, and an after school program. The private security company continues to have a positive impact as crime at the property has decreased. Management will continue to fund the private security operations with the hope that the decrease in home invasions will have a residual effect on surrounding community violence, increasing property appeal and occupancy. A new maintenance supervisor was hired in May 2011. The operating general partner hired a new regional director of operations in the fourth quarter to oversee its Georgia portfolio. The operating general partner has funded all operating deficits through 2011 and the first quarter of 2012. In January 2012, the operating general partner informedfor its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $6,929,737 and nominal consideration to the investment general partner that its ability and/or willingnesspartnerships. There are no cash proceeds to continuebe returned to fundcash reserves held by Series 30 and Series 34, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating deficits for the remainderexpenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the compliance period wouldinvestment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be severely limited. Both parties are discussing scenarios to assess additional funding sources for 2012 and beyond. The operating general partner continues to have regular conversations withdistributed based on the lender about re-structuringnumber of BACs held by each investor at the existing mortgage debt; however, no definitive plan has been offeredtime of distribution. As the annual losses generated by the lender. AllOperating Partnership had previously reduced the investment partnership’s tax insurance,basis carrying value to zero, no gain or loss was recognized by the investment partnership as a result of the transfer. In addition, the buyer executed a Post Transfer Compliance and mortgage payments are current asIndemnity Agreement and a Guaranty Agreement indemnifying Series 30 and Series 34, respectively, in the event of March 31, 2012. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2014. If the property is foreclosed in 2012, the estimated tax credit recapture cost and interest penalty of $642,173 is equivalent to tax credit recapture and interest of $178 per 1,000 BACs.recapture.

Howard Park Limited Partnership (Howard Park Apartments) is a 16-unit family property located in Florida City, FL. In 2007 the property was assessed incorrectly, resulting in high property taxes for years 2007-2009 that2007-2009; property operations could not support.were unable to support the high real estate tax burden. The operating general partner was successful in reducing the property’s assessed value for 2010 onward, but needed to obtain a personal loansloan to pay the 2007 and 2008 taxes. Funds could not be obtained to pay the 2009 taxes. The operating general partner should have made the personal loansloan to Howard Park as a subordinated operating general partner advance; however, improper monthly payments of principal and interest were made on the loansloan from the Operating Partnership during 2010.2010 and 2011. This additional debt drove operations below breakeven. The 2011 operations are also below breakeven due to these loan payments, despite high average occupancy of 97%.occupancy. A demand notice was sent to the operating general partner toduring the first quarter of 2012 requesting the return of the funds improperly paid out of the Operating Partnership towards histhe personal loans. Once paymentsloan. The investment general partner also discussed the loan treatment with the auditors and the operating general partner has indicated they are no longer being madeworking to resolve the issue on the additional debt, the property is anticipated to operate above breakeven.2012 audit. In the first quarter of 2012, the investment general partner advanced funds to the Operating Partnership to pay the delinquent 2009 taxes in order to avoid a tax liensale and preserve credit delivery. Subsequently, the operating general partner advanced funds to pay the outstanding real estate taxes and through the first quarter of 2013, real estate taxes are current for the property. The operating general partner has not submitted the 2012 audit or the 2013 first quarter financial reports. However, through the fourth quarter 2012, occupancy averaged 98% and the property has generated positive net operating income. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2014.

 

Southaven Partners I, LP (Bradford Park Apartments) is a 208-unit family property located in Southaven, MS. The property operated above breakeven through the first quarter of 2012 and ended March 2012 with 99% occupancy. During 2011 the property sustained wind damage caused by severe thunderstorms and fire damage caused when lightning struck a satellite dish and started a fire on the roof of a building. At the close of the fourth quarter of 2011, all repair work was complete and in November a certificate of occupancy for the fire-damaged building was issued by the city of Southaven, MS. All mortgage, tax and insurance payments are current. As the property has stabilized and is now operating above breakeven, the investment general partner will cease reporting for Southaven Partners I, LP subsequent to March 31, 2012.

(Series 35). As of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 1110 properties at March 31, 20122013 all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 20102011 the series, in total, generated $(1,183,327)$(1,614,161) and $(1,555,594)$(1,183,327), respectively, in passive tax income

(losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.08$0.02 and $0.58,$0.08, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 35 was $0 and $93,491, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method.$0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(320,129)$(229,818) and $(2,938,167)$(320,129), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships and the fund management fee and impairment losses.

Brazoswood Apartments, LP (Brazoswood Apartments) is a 72-unit property located in Clute, Texas. In 2011, the property maintained an average occupancy of 93% with operations above breakeven status. As of March 31, 2012, the property occupancy was 96%. Maintenance expenses remain high due to turnover costs. Utility expenses are high due to high water rates in the City of Clute. The continued struggle with vacancy is a direct reflection of economic conditions in rural Texas, where ongoing job losses have led to increased evictions and migration from the area. The property is not located in a densely populated area and the majority of residents are retail employees struggling with diminishing work hours and layoffs. Management’s marketing strategy focuses on aggressive business and community outreach programs coupled with print and on-line advertising. To promote resident retention and appeal to prospective residents, management organizes weekly social events and free monthly workshops for residents on various topics. Management has also added concessions and other incentives to improve occupancy. They are currently offering a one month rent concession prorated over a 12-month period, a $200 resident referral gift card incentive, and a finder’s fee of one month’s rent to realtors who bring in qualified residents. The investment general partner continues to work with management to attempt to reduce economic vacancy and control expenses. All real estate tax, insurance and mortgage payments are current. As the property has stabilized and is now operating above breakeven, the investment general partner will cease reporting for Brazoswood Apartments, LP subsequent to March 31, 2012.

fee.

Columbia Woods, LP (Columbia Woods Townhomes) is a 120-unit family property in Newnan, GA. Columbia Woods Townhomes has historically struggled to maintain averagewith low occupancy above 90% and operating expenses are also high. In 2010, average occupancy for the year improved to 91%, but dropped to 88% during the fourth quarter. The drop in occupancy combined with high operating expenses, resultedresulting in below breakeven operations in 2010. Operations in 2011 were similar. Occupancy was an average of 90%, but declined during the second half of the year to 82%. Expenses continued to be high in 2011 andfor many years. In 2012, the property again operatedclosed the fourth quarter 94% occupied and operations remained below breakeven. Occupancy duringbreakeven for 2012. During the first quarter of 2012 was 85%2013, management offered a $99 move-in special and operations are still below breakeven. In an effortas a result, occupancy remained strong, closing the quarter at 94% occupancy. Management continues to increase occupancy, management has been distributing fliers at local businessesmarket the property via rental websites and print marketing. Management also offers merchants a $50 referral fee. The resident referral fee is currently $300 and competing properties are being offeredprogram for current residents who refer a $100 referral fee. Current rents arenew resident to the property. During the first quarter, the investment general partner conducted a site visit at the maximum allowable rate. Management is workingproperty. The property was found to control expensesbe in good condition and anticipates that turnover expenses in particular will be reduced over the next several months.management team appeared well qualified to manage the property. The operating general partner’s obligation to fund deficits under the operating deficit guaranty has expired; however, the operating general partner continues to fund deficits and advanced $198,515 during 2011, bringing total advanceshas affirmed its commitment to $1,402,394.continue doing so. The operating general partner is currently exploring refinancing options that would result in a lower interest rate thanthe debt service on the property. However, the current loan which is at 8.25%. However,includes a largesubstantial yield maintenance premium which would be associated withincurred upon early repayment; thus far, the prepayment of the existing loan.lender has been unwilling to negotiate this penalty. Real estate taxes, mortgage and insurance payments are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2016. Real estate taxes, mortgage and insurance payments are current.

Hillside Terrace Associates, LP (Hillside Terrace Apartments) is a 64-unit property in Poughkeepsie, NY. In the first quarter ofDuring 2012, the property operated around breakeven, andproperty's occupancy averaged 100%. Operating expenses were high, but the property was still able to generate cash. While the property’s operations are stable, the property encountered a problem with its septic system’s leeching field. Since its installation in 2000-2001, the field has failed to perform in a consistent manner. As a result, management initiated a program to pump the system monthly. Over the years, the pumping has occurred more frequently due to flooding in the field. In an effort to temporarily reduce the flooding and associated pumping costs, the property has effectively reduced its flow rate by utilizing conservation methods including low-flow faucets and front loading washing machines. As a more permanent solution, the investment general partner and the operating general partner began negotiationsnegotiated with the abutting property owner to connect to its sewer system. The negotiation bogged down in late 2011 dueone-time cost to an unrelated conflict betweenconnect to the abuttersystem was paid utilizing funds from the operating reserve account, the operating account, replacement reserves, and the Town of Poughkeepsie. As of the first quarter of 2012, the conflict has been resolved and negotiations are continuing. The investment general partner intends to continue to work with management andadvances from the operating general partner to remedy the failed septic system. Another issue was that the Operating Partnership underfunded its operating reserve account per the terms of the lender’s regulatory agreement. This technically represents an event of default, which could result in demanding immediate full payment of the loan. Based on history with the lender, management does not believe the loan will be called. The investment limited partner intends to work with theand investment general partner on soliciting a loan covenant waiver to ensure thatpartner. The use of all reserve funds was approved by the mortgage will not be called.state agency and lender. Construction was completed in March 2013. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2014. As the property has stabilized and is now operating above breakeven, the investment general partner will cease reporting for Hillside Terrace Associates, LP subsequent to March 31, 2013.

In July 2012, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Brazoswood Apartments, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,835,833 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $60,000. Of the total proceeds received, $2,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of approximately $52,500 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 35. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer has been recorded in the amount of $52,500 as of September 30, 2012.

 

(Series 36). As of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 119 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 20102011 the series, in total, generated $(945,248)$216,523 and $(1,353,467)$(945,248), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.03$0.00 and $0.45,$0.03, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.


As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 36 was $0$0. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and $57,706,for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $1,171,987 and $(191,788), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships and the fund management fee.

In March 2012, the operating general partner of Aloha Housing LP entered into an agreement to sell the property to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner and the transaction closed on December 21, 2012. The sales price of the property was $5,500,000, which included the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,749,703, a seller’s note equal to $750,000 (which the investment limited partnership has a 50% ownership interest), and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $1,324,272. Of the total proceeds received by the investment partnership, $77,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $1,242,272 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 36. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. The buyer executed a Post Transfer Compliance and Indemnity Agreement indemnifying Series 36 in the event of recapture. Note that the operating general partner wired an additional $131,000 from its share of the net sale proceeds to the investment general partner to be held as security for the Post Transfer Compliance and Indemnity Agreement. The $131,000 will be returned to the operating general partner approximately three years after the expiration of the compliance period assuming there is no event of recapture. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer has been recorded in the amount of $1,242,272 as of December 31, 2012.

Nowata Village, LP (Nowata Village Apartments) is a 28-unit property in Nowata, OK. In 2011, occupancy averaged 86%. The low occupancy combined with an increase in operating expenses caused the property to operate below breakeven in 2011. Maintenance expenses were particularly high in 2011 due to Rural Development restrictions imposed on the property. Management is required to contract out all maintenance work at a higher cost instead of using affiliated company employees.  In 2012, the property averaged 88% occupancy and continued to operate below breakeven. High maintenance costs continued to be an issue. The maintenance work done in 2012 included carpet and tile replacements, range replacements, and air conditioner repairs. Rural Development approved some replacement reserve withdrawals which helped cash flow but did not cover all repairs for the year. In the first quarter of 2013, the property had the roof replaced which was covered by the replacement reserve. The property was 89% occupied as of March 31, 2013 and was operating above breakeven after consideration of reserve withdrawals. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as needed. The property’s mortgage, real estate taxes, and insurance payments are all current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2014.

In January 2013, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Annadale Housing Partners to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $7,571,733 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $7,500. Of the total proceeds received, $7,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. There were no remaining proceeds returned to cash reserves held by Series 36. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership was recorded.

(Series 37). As of March 31, 2013 and 2012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 7 properties at March 31, 2013 all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the series, in total, generated $(1,598,753) and $(1,391,842), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.06 and $0.26, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 37 was $0. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(191,788)$(195,816) and $(1,931,251)$(208,996), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships and the

fund management fee, and impairment losses.

Farmington Meadows Apartments (Aloha Housing Limited Partnership) is a 69-unit apartment complex located in Aloha, OR, with project-based Section 8 subsidy on 100% of the units. The property operated above breakeven through 2007; however, in 2008, despite strong occupancy of 95%, the property operated below breakeven due to the high debt service requirements. Occupancy remains strong, with an average of 99% for 2011 and the first quarter of 2012. Despite strong occupancy, operations continue to struggle due to the high debt service payments. The property operated below breakeven in 2011 and in the first quarter of 2012. A number of other issues have also affected cash flow, resulting in several late payments on the mortgage. The property’s balconies deteriorated significantly from 2006 to 2008. Work to remediate the balconies was completed in the first quarter of 2009.

Due to limited funds, the Operating Partnership had been alternating between paying vendors and making its debt service payments; however, the mortgages have remained current since 2009, partially through a release of funds from the Operating Partnership’s debt service reserve. At the end of the first quarter of 2012, the real estate tax and insurance payments and the two mortgages are current; however, the debt service reserve fund and the transition fund remain underfunded. To date, the lender has not issued a default notice. At the end of the second quarter of 2010 the operating general partner agreed to pursue refinancing the current debt. In the second quarter of 2011 the operating general partner was advised by the potential lender it had been working with for the prior nine months that, due to the operating general partner’s inability to satisfy the lender’s underwriting criteria, the lender would not be able to refinance the mortgage debt at that time.

On March 22, 2012 the operating general partner and an affiliate of the current management company executed a purchase and sale agreement, in which the management company plans to purchase and rehabilitate the property and re-syndicate a new stream of LIHTC. The sale is contingent upon the management company receiving an award of 2013 LIHTC, which is expected to be determined in the third quarter of 2012. If the management company purchases the property, it intends to keep the property compliant with LIHTC regulations through the end of the compliance period on December 31, 2013. If a sale or some type of refinancing does not occur and the operating general partner does not keep the mortgage payments current, the property could be sold at a foreclosure sale as early as 2012. A foreclosure sale in 2012 would require the Operating Partnership to recognize estimated tax credit recapture costs and an interest penalty of approximately $330,130, equivalent to $155 per 1,000 BACs. The investment general partner intends to continue to monitor the progress of the sale and all other issues and will continue to encourage the operating general partner to fund deficits in a timely manner.


(Series 37). As of March 31, 2012 and 2011 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 7 properties at March 31, 2012 all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the series, in total, generated $(1,391,842) and $(1,377,085), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.26 and $0.83, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 37 was $0 and $36,479, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the net income (loss) of the series was $(208,996) and $(1,886,664), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, impairment losses, and amortization of acquisition costs.fee.

Columbia Woods, LP (Columbia Woods Townhomes) is a 120-unit family property in Newnan, GA. Columbia Woods Townhomes has historically struggled to maintain averagewith low occupancy above 90% and operating expenses are also high. In 2010, average occupancy for the year improved to 91%, but dropped to 88% during the fourth quarter. The drop in occupancy combined with high operating expenses, resultedresulting in below breakeven operations in 2010. Operations in 2011 were similar. Occupancy was an average of 90%, but declined during the second half of the year to 82%. Expenses continued to be high in 2011 andfor many years. In 2012, the property again operatedclosed the fourth quarter 94% occupied and operations remained below breakeven. Occupancy duringbreakeven for 2012. During the first quarter of 2012 was 85%2013, management offered a $99 move-in special and operations are still below breakeven. In an effortas a result, occupancy remained strong, closing the quarter at 94% occupancy. Management continues to increase occupancy, management has been distributing fliers at local businessesmarket the property via rental websites and print marketing. Management also offers merchants a $50 referral fee. The resident referral fee is currently $300 and competing properties are offeringprogram for current residents who refer a $100 referral fee. Current rents arenew resident to the property. During the first quarter, the investment general partner conducted a site visit at the maximum allowable rate. Management is workingproperty. The property was found to control expensesbe in good condition and anticipates that turnover expenses in particular will be reduced over the next several months.management team appeared well qualified to manage the property. The operating general partner’s obligation to fund deficits under the operating deficit guaranty has expired; however, the operating general partner continues to fund deficits and advanced $198,515 during 2011, bringing total advanceshas affirmed its commitment to $1,402,394.continue doing so. The operating general partner is currently exploring refinancing options that would result in a lower interest rate thanthe debt service on the property. However, the current loan which is at 8.25%. However,includes a largesubstantial yield maintenance premium which would be associated withincurred upon early repayment; thus far, the prepayment of the existing loan.lender has been unwilling to negotiate this penalty. Real estate taxes, mortgage and insurance payments are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2016. Real estate taxes, mortgage and insurance payments are current.

 

Stearns Assisted Housing Associates, LP (Stearns Assisted Housing) is a 20-unit senior property in Millinocket, ME. Despite strong occupancy of 100% as of March 31, 2012,2013, the property continued to operate at a deficit through the first quarter of 2012 due to high utility and maintenance expenses. Management indicated that even if occupancy were to stay at 100%, the property would not be able to support the high operating expenses. The high utility costs are directly related to the increased cost of fuel, coupled with an inefficient heating system.system, and greater heating demand during the winter months. Maintenance expenses also continued to be high in the first quarter due to costly HVAC repairs, as well as carpetcleaning of the drain and vinyl replacement.sewer lines, and seasonal snow-plowing. To offset the high expenses, management was grantedwill implement a $10$15 rent increase scheduledeffective May 1, 2013 for May 2012.the 11 non-voucher holders which will increase gross potential rent by $1,980 annually. The operating general partner’s operating deficit guaranty is unlimited in time and amount and he continues to fund cash deficits as necessary. All mortgage, tax and insurance payments are current.

 

Baldwin Villas Limited Partnership (Baldwin Villas) is a 65-unit property located in Pontiac, MI. The project consists of three and four-bedroom single family rental homes, with a home ownership option available to qualifying tenants. Because the cost to build the project approximated the cost for a single-family development, construction of the project required a significant amount of debt. As a result, the rent structure required to support the project is high, and most tenants need significant subsidies to afford the $1,000+$900+/per month rents. The property has experienced a significant decline in operations and cash flow since 2006. As of March 31, 2012,2013, Baldwin Villas had significant unpaid debt service obligations, accrued real estate taxes, and operating payables. It also had a list of deferred maintenance items that could not be addressed due to the property’s weak operating cash flow.

 

Since 2008, Baldwin Villas has had numerous monetary and technical defaults on its first mortgage debt. The Operating Partnership obtained the initial funding for this project from variable rate bonds issued by the state housing authority. These bonds were secured by an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a local bank. The letter of credit fee, which had been accruing at approximately $33,000 per quarter, totaled approximately $213,000 on August 30, 2011 when the letter of credit was drawn on and the bonds were paid in full. This event converted the original bond financing for the Operating Partnership to a traditional commercial mortgage loan.

On August 30, 2011, Baldwin Villas entered into a Settlement Agreement with the lender resulting in a new mortgage note being issued which is guaranteed by the operating general partner and its principals. Under the terms of the new mortgage note, the principal balance outstanding for the loan was confirmed at $4,809,749. In addition, there is a deferred amount owed to the bank for unpaid letter of credit fees and other bank costs (e.g. legal costs) of $459,856. The interest rate on the new mortgage note was set at 2% over prime. The note has a maturity date of June 30, 2013, and monthly installments of $35,000 that commenced on October 22, 2011. According to the Settlement Agreement, Baldwin Villas was required to make $30,000 installment payments in August and September 2011 to pay down the principal balance of the new mortgage note, as well as pay the 2009, 2010 and 2011 outstanding real estate taxes based on an agreed upon payment schedule. In addition, one of the principals of the operating general partner iswas required to pay the lender an additional $400,000 toward the mortgage debt with two, $200,000 installment payments due on April 30, 2012 and November 30, 2012, respectively, from distributions or income from certain unrelated entities owned by that principal. Furthermore, as part of the Settlement Agreement, Baldwin Villas provided the lender with “consent and confession judgments” through the Circuit Court of Oakland County, MI, which, in the event of a default under the Settlement Agreement, would allow the lender to appoint a receiver who would have the authority to sell the property. The Settlement Agreement was executed without the knowledge or consent of the investment general partner.

 

The operating general partner has an unlimited operating deficit guaranty to provide operating deficit advances to the Operating Partnership. In February 2013 and February 2012, the operating general partner provided $109,055approximately $98,500 and $109,000, respectively, to pay the 2010 and 2009 outstanding real estate taxes, interest and penalties. InFurthermore, in the first quarter of 2013 and during 2012 and 2011, the operating general partner provided $146,382approximately $51,000, $448,500, and $146,500, respectively, of operating deficit advances to Baldwin Villas to satisfy the required payment obligations of the new mortgage note and settlement agreement. From inception through March 31, 2012,2013, the operating general partner has provided operating deficit advances to Baldwin Villas totaling $357,283.approximately $955,000. As of June 27, 2012May 7, 2013 the required monthly installment payments of the new mortgage note and settlement agreement have been made; however, the 20102012 and 2011 real estate taxes and related interest and penalties, totaling approximately $97,800$108,800 and $89,300,$104,800, respectively, have not been paid. Also, the operating general partner indicated that the April 20, 2012$200,000 installment payment ofoutlined above and due on April 30, 2012 has been paid; however, the $200,000 installment payment that was due from certain unrelated entities owned by a principal ofon November 30, 2012 has been delayed as the operating general partner has been paid.  Nocontinues to negotiate with the lender on an exit strategy for the property (discussed further below).  As of May 7, 2013, no default notice has been received by the partnershipOperating Partnership from the lender as of June 27, 2012.lender.

 

For the quarter ending March 31, 2012, average occupancy had further eroded to 67%. Average occupancy decreased to 80%at the property for 2011the first quarter of 2013 was 64%, compared to 89% for 2010.65% and 79% in 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increased vacancy at the property is due to the continued poor local economy and limited job opportunities in the Pontiac area, as well as the lack of available funds to complete costly tenant turnovers, as further discussed below. The reported unemployment rate in Pontiac, MI for March 2012 was 21.1% compared to 8.8% for the State of Michigan. In recent years Section 8 vouchers have again become available and as of March 31, 20122013 approximately 40%65% of the property’s tenant base consists ofleased units are occupied by Section 8 voucher holders. Since 2009, management has tried to improve occupancy through working with the local housing authority to obtain voucher holder referrals, held several open houses, and increased online and newspaper advertisements. A new full time property manager was hired in January 2012.

 

The property has operated significantly below breakeven for the past few years. Operating expenses remain well above state averages due to the fact that the property consists of three and four-bedroom single-family homes. In previous years, maintenance expenses were very high due to extremely costly unit turnover expenses for these single-family homes. However, forin the first quarter ending March 31,of 2013 and during 2012 and in 2011, maintenance expenses had generally decreased due to poorlower occupancy and less cash flow available to address the property’s maintenance needs. Although there are qualified tenants available, vacancies continue to remain high due to the lack of available funds to complete the costly tenant turnovers. Utility expenses increased inhave been a problem at the quarter ending March 31, 2012, 2011 andproperty since 2010 duewhen occupancy started to decline as the chargesOperating Partnership is required to maintainpay for basic heating and lighting costs rather than tenants for increasing unoccupied homes.the increased number of vacant units. This problem continued into the first quarter of 2013.

In January 2011, Baldwin Villas received a tax foreclosure notice from Oakland County regarding past due2008 real estate taxes.  Total taxes, interest and penalties of $105,695 were due on March 31, 2011 or the County had the right to take the property through foreclosure.  On March 16, 2011, the lender made a protective advance for the outstanding amount to prevent the property from being taken through foreclosure. The protective advance was added to the principal balance in the new mortgage note and Settlement Agreement discussed above.

 

ForIn recent years the Operating Partnership has experienced significant negative operations. In the first quarter ending March 31,of 2013 and in 2012, the Operating Partnership expended net cash flow of approximately ($95,000)130,000) and ($665,046), respectively, due to low occupancy and consequentlythe resulting low rental revenue, high debt service payment requirements from the Settlement Agreement, and high real estate taxes. Negative operations were primarily funded by advances from the operating general partner and accrual of real estate taxes. In 2011, the Operating Partnership has expended net cash flows of approximately ($606,688) funded primarily through the increase in mortgage debt from default fees from the Settlement Agreement and operating deficit advances from the operating general partner, as well as accruals of operating payables and real estate taxes. In 2010, the Operating Partnership expended net cash flows of ($306,845) funded primarily through increased accruals in operating payables, interest, letter of credit fees, and real estate taxes.

 

As noted above, the operating general partner reports that the lender has not yet issued a default notice to the Operating Partnership with regard to the new mortgage note and Settlement Agreement. Also, the operating general partner indicated that it is negotiating with the lender to extend or re-structure the new mortgage note that matures on June 30, 2013. As of March 2012,31, 2013, the Operating Partnership remains current on its property insurance obligations. Real estate taxes for 20112012 and 20102011 totaling approximately $185,000$213,600 remain unpaid. The operating general partner indicated that it did file appeals for the 20112012 and 20102011 real estate taxes, which are currently pending. The investment general partner continues to press the operating general partner to provide operating deficit advances to: 1) pay the mortgage obligations of the Settlement Agreement and real estate tax deficiencies, 2) pay down growing payables, and 3) fund deferred maintenance and tenant turnover expenses which will improve occupancy at the property. Also, the operating general partner is discussing a house by house sales effort that would be executed in coordination with a nonprofit affordable housing agency and the lender; all sales would be to low-income qualified homebuyers in order to avoid recapture costs for the investment limited partner. Note that the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period for Baldwin Villas expires on December 31, 2015. If the property is foreclosed in 2012,2013, the estimated tax credit recapture cost and interest penalty of $761,943$585,204 is equivalent to recapture and interest of $297$228 per 1,000 BACs.

HWY. 18 Partners, LP (Summer Park Apartments) is a 216-unit family property located in Jackson, MS. In 2012, the property closed the fourth quarter 75% occupied, with operations below breakeven. During the first quarter of 2013, occupancy remained at 75%, totaling 54 vacant units. Management continues to focus on getting vacant units ready for occupancy and leasing. Management has set an assertive goal of five move-ins per/week and is currently offering a reduced deposit of $99 and a 50% reduction on the first month’s rent. During the first quarter of 2013 there were 15 move-ins and 17 move-outs. Management continues to evict tenants for non-payment of rent but many tenants have been leaving the property due to the increased crime in the Jackson, MS area. There were three security related lawsuits against the property in 2012. The first two lawsuits were a result of the same incident involving an armed robbery at the property and were settled by the insurance company in April of 2013. The third lawsuit filed in February 2013, resulted from an alleged car robbery on the property premises. This case is also being handled by the Operating Partnership’s insurance carrier. An evaluation of a favorable or unfavorable outcome is not possible at this time. Damages awarded in this claim cannot exceed a $200,000 jurisdictional limit. Management does not expect a considerable increase in insurance premium as result of the settled or pending litigations. Management is looking to add security at the property but lacks sufficient funds to include in the 2013 budget. Management has requested bids from several security companies to determine if this additional cost can be supported by future operations. Currently, management has deployed additional patrols by the courtesy office and staff. Supplemental lighting has also been added to existing light poles and to the exterior of 14 buildings. Operating expenses continued to decrease during the first quarter of 2013 as much of the work needed to turn vacant units has been completed in-house. Two new maintenance directors were hired for the Ambling portfolio in Jackson. The maintenance directors will oversee the maintenance staffs at each property and provide additional resources to complete more work internally at a lower cost. A special replacement reserve withdrawal was approved by the lender and has helped pay down closed accounts with vendors and enabled management to turn vacant units quickly. All mortgage, insurance and real estate tax payments are current as of March 31, 2013 and the low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2014.

 

(Series 38). As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 10 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the series, in total, generated $(902,661)$(906,551) and $(789,484)$(902,661), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.50$0.04 and $0.83,$0.50, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 38 was $30,033$0 and $999,523,$30,033, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

 

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(1,076,160)$(143,068) and $(2,942,239)$(1,076,160), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, and impairment losses.

Columbia Creek, LP (Columbia Creek Apartments) is a 172-unit family property in Woodstock, GA. Columbia Creek Apartments has historically struggled to maintain average occupancy above 90% and operating expenses are also high. In 2010 and 2011, average. Low occupancy of 88% and 90%, respectively, coupled with high operating expenses resulted inhave caused below breakeven operations in bothfor many years. Occupancy duringIn 2012, the property operated below breakeven and continued to struggle with low occupancy and high maintenance expenses. During the first quarter of 20122013, the property continued to operate below breakeven and occupancy remained a challenge. As of March 31, 2013, the property was 90% and operations remain below breakeven. In an effort85% occupied. Management continues to increase occupancy, management has been distributing fliers at local businesses and offers merchantsmarket the property via a $50 referral fee. The resident referral fee is currently $300program, online rental websites and competing properties are offeringvia print media. During the first quarter, the investment general partner conducted a $100 referral fee. Management’s goal is to reach 95% minimum occupancy during the second quarter of 2012. Current rents aresite visit inspection at the maximum allowable rate. Management is workingproperty. The property was in good condition and the management team appeared qualified to control expenses and anticipates that turnover expenses in particular will be reduced overmanage the next several months.property. The operating general partner’s obligation to fund deficits under the operating deficit guaranty has expired; however, the operating general partner continues to fund deficits and advanced $307,879 during 2011.deficits. The operating general partner is currently exploring refinancing options that would result in a lower interest rate thanthe debt service on the property. However, the current loan which is at 8.20%. However,includes a largesubstantial yield maintenance premium which would be associated withincurred upon early repayment and the prepayment of the existing loan.lender has been unwilling to negotiate this penalty. Real estate taxes, mortgage and insurance payments are current. The low income tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2016. Real estate taxes, mortgage and insurance payments are current.

Bristow Place Apartments, Limited Partnership (Bristow Place Apartments) is a 28-unit family property in Bristow, OK. In 2010, operations fell2011, Bristow Place was operating below breakeven due toas a drop inresult of declining occupancy and a 47% increase inincreased operating expenses, particularly maintenance and insurance costs. The majority of the maintenance costs were replacement items that were not reimbursed from the replacement reserve account due to Rural Development restrictions. In addition, Rural Development required the property tothat management contract out all maintenance work at a higher cost rather than using affiliated company employees. A spike in insurance claims across the Midwest in 2008 and 2009 resulted in significantly higher insurance premiums. As a result of the lower occupancy and increased operating expenses, Bristow Place suffered a cash flow deficit in 2010. In 2011, average occupancy dropped to 82%. Although operating expenses decreased in 2011, the lower rental income resulted in the property operating below breakeven. Through the first quarter of 2012, the property is averaging 91%operated above breakeven due to a rent increase and higher occupancy. The property averaged 89% occupancy for the year and is generating cash.the increase in rental income allowed the property to generate cash flow. As of March 31, 2013, the property was 89% occupied and was operating slightly above breakeven. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as needed. The property’s mortgage, real estate taxes, and insurance payments are all current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2015. As the property has stabilized and is now operating above breakeven, the investment general partner will cease reporting for Bristow Place Apartments, Limited Partnership subsequent to March 31, 2013.

 

(Series 39). As of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 9 properties at March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 20102011 the series, in total, generated $(688,752)$(967,720) and $(900,642)$(688,752), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.71$0.09 and $0.93,$0.71, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 39 was $127,952$0 and $1,378,166,$127,952, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(1,392,463)$(254,218) and $(2,757,577)$(1,392,463), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, and impairment losses.

Columbia Creek, LP (Columbia Creek Apartments) is a 172-unit family property in Woodstock, GA. Columbia Creek Apartments has historically struggled to maintain average occupancy above 90% and operating expenses are also high. In 2010 and 2011, average. Low occupancy of 88% and 90%, respectively, coupled with high operating expenses resulted inhave caused below breakeven operations in bothfor many years. Occupancy duringIn 2012, the property operated below breakeven and continued to struggle with low occupancy and high maintenance expenses. During the first quarter of 20122013, the property continued to operate below breakeven and occupancy remained a challenge. As of March 31, 2013, the property was 90% and operations remain below breakeven. In an effort85% occupied. Management continues to increase occupancy, management has been distributing fliers at local businesses and offers merchantsmarket the property via a $50 referral fee. The resident referral fee is currently $300program, online rental websites and competing properties are offeringvia print media. During the first quarter, the investment general partner conducted a $100 referral fee. Management’s goal is to reach 95% minimum occupancy during the second quarter of 2012. Current rents aresite visit inspection at the maximum allowable rate. Management is workingproperty. The property was in good condition and the management team appeared qualified to control expenses and anticipates that turnover expenses in particular will be reduced overmanage the next several months.property. The operating general partner’s obligation to fund deficits under the operating deficit guaranty has expired; however, the operating general partner continues to fund deficits and advanced $307,879 during 2011.deficits. The operating general partner is currently exploring refinancing options that would result in a lower interest rate thanthe debt service on the property. However, the current loan which is at 8.20%. However,includes a largesubstantial yield maintenance premium which would be associated withincurred upon early repayment and the prepayment of the existing loan.lender has been unwilling to negotiate this penalty. Real estate taxes, mortgage and insurance payments are current. The low income tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2016. Real estate taxes, mortgage and insurance payments are current.

(Series 40). As of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 16 properties at March 31, 2010,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

 

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 20102011 the series, in total, generated $(625,030)$(652,403) and $(1,024,814)$(625,030), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.82$0.11 and $0.92,$0.82, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 40 was $307,320$0 and $2,491,075,$307,320, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method.

By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.


For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(2,411,765)$(506,558) and $(2,748,973)$(2,411,765), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, and impairment losses.


Baldwin Villas Limited Partnership (Baldwin Villas) is a 65-unit property located in Pontiac, MI. The project consists of three and four-bedroom single family rental homes, with a home ownership option available to qualifying tenants. Because the cost to build the project approximated the cost for a single-family development, construction of the project required a significant amount of debt. As a result, the rent structure required to support the project is high, and most tenants need significant subsidies to afford the $1,000+$900+/per month rents. The property has experienced a significant decline in operations and cash flow since 2006. As of March 31, 2012,2013, Baldwin Villas had significant unpaid debt service obligations, accrued real estate taxes, and operating payables. It also had a list of deferred maintenance items that could not be addressed due to the property’s weak operating cash flow.

Since 2008, Baldwin Villas has had numerous monetary and technical defaults on its first mortgage debt. The Operating Partnership obtained the initial funding for this project from variable rate bonds issued by the state housing authority. These bonds were secured by an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a local bank. The letter of credit fee, which had been accruing at approximately $33,000 per quarter, totaled approximately $213,000 on August 30, 2011 when the letter of credit was drawn on and the bonds were paid in full. This event converted the original bond financing for the Operating Partnership to a traditional commercial mortgage loan.

On August 30, 2011, Baldwin Villas entered into a Settlement Agreement with the lender resulting in a new mortgage note being issued which is guaranteed by the operating general partner and its principals. Under the terms of the new mortgage note, the principal balance outstanding for the loan was confirmed at $4,809,749. In addition, there is a deferred amount owed to the bank for unpaid letter of credit fees and other bank costs (e.g. legal costs) of $459,856. The interest rate on the new mortgage note was set at 2% over prime. The note has a maturity date of June 30, 2013, and monthly installments of $35,000 that commenced on October 22, 2011. According to the Settlement Agreement, Baldwin Villas was required to make $30,000 installment payments in August and September 2011 to pay down the principal balance of the new mortgage note, as well as pay the 2009, 2010 and 2011 outstanding real estate taxes based on an agreed upon payment schedule. In addition, one of the principals of the operating general partner was required to pay the lender an additional $400,000 toward the mortgage debt with two, $200,000 installment payments due on April 30, 2012 and November 30, 2012, respectively, from distributions or income from certain unrelated entities owned by that principal. Furthermore, as part of the Settlement Agreement, Baldwin Villas provided the lender with “consent and confession judgments” through the Circuit Court of Oakland County, MI, which, in the event of a default under the Settlement Agreement, would allow the lender to appoint a receiver who would have the authority to sell the property. The Settlement Agreement was executed without the knowledge or consent of the investment general partner.

The operating general partner has an unlimited operating deficit guaranty to provide operating deficit advances to the Operating Partnership. In February 2013 and February 2012, the operating general partner provided approximately $98,500 and $109,000, respectively, to pay the 2010 and 2009 outstanding real estate taxes, interest and penalties. Furthermore, in the first quarter of 2013 and during 2012 and 2011, the operating general partner provided approximately $51,000, $448,500, and $146,500, respectively, of operating deficit advances to Baldwin Villas to satisfy the required payment obligations of the new mortgage note and settlement agreement. From inception through March 31, 2013, the operating general partner has provided operating deficit advances to Baldwin Villas totaling approximately $955,000. As of May 7, 2013 the required monthly installment payments of the new mortgage note and settlement agreement have been made; however, the 2012 and 2011 real estate taxes and related interest and penalties, totaling approximately $108,800 and $104,800, respectively, have not been paid. Also, the operating general partner indicated that the $200,000 installment payment outlined above and due on April 30, 2012 has been paid; however, the $200,000 installment payment that was due on November 30, 2012 has been delayed as the operating general partner continues to negotiate with the lender on an exit strategy for the property (discussed further below).  As of May 7, 2013, no default notice has been received by the Operating Partnership from the lender.

Average occupancy at the property for the first quarter of 2013 was 64%, compared to 65% and 79% in 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increased vacancy at the property is due to the continued poor local economy and limited job opportunities in the Pontiac area, as well as the lack of available funds to complete costly tenant turnovers, as further discussed below. The reported unemployment rate in Pontiac, MI for March 2012 was 21.1% compared to 8.8% for the State of Michigan. In recent years Section 8 vouchers have again become available and as of March 31, 2013 approximately 65% of the property’s leased units are occupied by Section 8 voucher holders.

The property has operated significantly below breakeven for the past few years. Operating expenses remain well above state averages due to the fact that the property consists of three and four-bedroom single-family homes. In previous years, maintenance expenses were very high due to extremely costly unit turnover expenses for these single-family homes. However, in the first quarter of 2013 and during 2012 and 2011, maintenance expenses had generally decreased due to lower occupancy and less cash flow available to address the property’s maintenance needs. Although there are qualified tenants available, vacancies continue to remain high due to the lack of available funds to complete the costly tenant turnovers. Utility expenses have been a problem at the property since 2010 when occupancy started to decline as the Operating Partnership is required to pay for basic heating and lighting costs rather than tenants for the increased number of vacant units. This problem continued into the first quarter of 2013.

In January 2011, Baldwin Villas received a tax foreclosure notice from Oakland County regarding past due2008 real estate taxes.  Total taxes, interest and penalties of $105,695 were due on March 31, 2011 or the County had the right to take the property through foreclosure.  On March 16, 2011, the lender made a protective advance for the outstanding amount to prevent the property from being taken through foreclosure. The protective advance was added to the principal balance in the new mortgage note and Settlement Agreement discussed above.

In recent years the Operating Partnership has experienced significant negative operations. In the first quarter of 2013 and in 2012, the Operating Partnership expended net cash flow of approximately ($130,000) and ($665,046), respectively, due to low occupancy and the resulting low rental revenue, high debt service payment requirements from the Settlement Agreement, and high real estate taxes. Negative operations were primarily funded by advances from the operating general partner and accrual of real estate taxes. In 2011, the Operating Partnership expended net cash flows of ($606,688) funded primarily through the increase in mortgage debt from default fees from the Settlement Agreement and operating deficit advances from the operating general partner, as well as accruals of operating payables and real estate taxes. As noted above, the operating general partner reports that the lender has not yet issued a default notice to the Operating Partnership with regard to the new mortgage note and Settlement Agreement. Also, the operating general partner indicated that it is negotiating with the lender to extend or re-structure the new mortgage note that matures on June 30, 2013. As of March 31, 2013, the Operating Partnership remains current on its property insurance obligations. Real estate taxes for 2012 and 2011 totaling approximately $213,600 remain unpaid. The operating general partner indicated that it did file appeals for the 2012 and 2011 real estate taxes, which are currently pending. The investment general partner continues to press the operating general partner to provide operating deficit advances to: 1) pay the mortgage obligations of the Settlement Agreement and real estate tax deficiencies, 2) pay down growing payables, and 3) fund deferred maintenance and tenant turnover expenses which will improve occupancy at the property. Also, the operating general partner is discussing a house by house sales effort that would be executed in coordination with a nonprofit affordable housing agency and the lender; all sales would be to low-income qualified homebuyers in order to avoid recapture costs for the investment limited partner. Note that the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period for Baldwin Villas expires on December 31, 2015. If the property is foreclosed in 2013, the estimated tax credit recapture cost and interest penalty of $119,846 is equivalent to recapture and interest of $45 per 1,000 BACs.

Sedgwick - Sundance Apartments, Limited Partnership (Sedgwick - Sundance Apartments) is a 24-unit senior property in Sedgwick, Kansas. The property operated below breakeven in 2011 due to a decline in occupancy, insufficient rental rates, and high debt service. After averaging 92% occupancy in 2011, the property was 100% occupied as of December 31, 2012 and 96% occupied as of March 31, 2013. The decline in occupancy in 2011 was due to a number of deaths and residents moving to assisted living facilities. The improvement is attributed to increased marketing and advertising efforts beyond the property's normal geographic area. By aggressively marketing the surrounding areas with fliers, cold calling local agencies, advertising in the local newspaper, and offering a $99 move-in special for the first month, management was successful in releasing the vacant units. The property continues to operate below breakeven due to insufficient rental rates. Management petitioned the Kansas Housing Resources Corporation for a $35 per unit, per month, rent increase on all units, effective August 2012, and received approval. The full impact of the increase will not be experienced until the first quarter 2013 as management was not able to increase rents on its existing tenant base until lease renewals which mostly occurred in December 2012. Once fully implemented, the increase will add an additional $10,080 annually to gross revenue, but is still not likely to improve performance above breakeven without a reduction in the debt service. No further rent increases are planned for 2013. The operating general partner is exploring refinancing options but is finding it difficult to attract lenders due to the size of the loan. The current plan is to package a portfolio of refinancing to obtain the best terms. The real estate taxes, mortgage and insurance are all current as of March 31, 2013. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2016.

MA NO 2, LLC (Parkview Apartments) is a 25-unit family property in Springfield, MA. During the third quarter of 2012 occupancy declined to 80% due to a fire occurring in one of the units at the property. The cause was attributed to a tenant turning on the stove and then leaving the apartment. Most of the damage sustained in the unit was due to water damage from the sprinkler system. Three additional units were also affected by water damage but have since been rented. Occupancy subsequently improved to 100% during the fourth quarter of 2012. In 2012 the property operated well, generating $23,000 of cash. As of March 31, 2013, occupancy was 92%, and the property operated below breakeven. High maintenance and utility expenses negatively impacted net operating income. Management reported that repairs from a leaking boiler and carpet replacement from fire damage contributed to the higher expenses. Utility expenses also increased as the property provided space heaters to tenants during the new boiler installation. Management expects to subsidize this first quarter short-fall with replacement reserve withdrawals. Once the funds are received, management projects the property to operate at breakeven in 2013. Management has confirmed that the mortgage, property taxes, and insurance are current through March 31, 2013. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2016.

(Series 41) As of March 31, 2013 and 2012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 20 properties at March 31, 2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the series, in total, generated $(911,814) and $(1,729,160), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.36 and $0.74, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 41 was $0 and $892,598, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(1,379,525) and $(2,401,457), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, impairment losses and amortization of acquisition costs.

Rural Housing Partners of Mt. Carroll, LP (Mill Creek Village) is a 12-unit family property in Mt. Carroll, IL. The property is located in a depressed rural area. Occupancy at the property averaged 74% in 2012 and it was 75% occupied as of March 31, 2013. The low occupancy is the result of weak economic conditions in the area. Two of the units lost rental assistance from Rural Development several years ago because they were vacant for more than six months. It is now difficult to find tenants who can afford the rents of these two units without rental assistance. According to the operating general partner, there is little chance of regaining the lost rental assistance. As a result, the operating general partner has focused on reducing operating expenses. However, the property operated below breakeven through the first quarter of 2013. The mortgage, property taxes, and insurance are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2016.

Rural Housing Partners of Mendota, LP (Northline Terrace) is a 24-unit family property in Mendota, IL. The property is located in a depressed rural area and receives rental assistance from Rural Development. The low occupancy is the result of weak economic conditions in the area. Occupancy was 85% as of March 31, 2013. Management has intensified its leasing efforts by using concessions and other incentives, such as one month rent free prorated over a 12-month lease. In addition, management has focused on reducing operating expenses. However, the property operated below breakeven through the first quarter of 2013. The mortgage, property taxes, and insurance are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2016.

Rural Housing Partners of Fulton, LP (Palisades Park) is a 16-unit family property in Fulton, IL. The property is located in a depressed rural area and receives rental assistance from Rural Development. Management has intensified its leasing efforts by using concessions and other incentives, such as one month rent free prorated over a 12-month lease. As a result of management’s efforts, occupancy increased to 93% as of March 31, 2013 and operations have been slightly above breakeven through the first quarter of 2013. The mortgage, property taxes and insurance are current. As the property has stabilized and is now operating above breakeven, the investment general partner will cease reporting for Rural Housing Partners of Fulton, LP subsequent to March 31, 2013.

Rural Housing Partners of Franklin Grove, LP (Franklin Green) is a 12-unit family property in Franklin Grove, IL. The property is located in a depressed rural area. Occupancy was 83% as of March 31, 2013. The low occupancy is the result of weak economic conditions in the area. The operating general partner has increased marketing by adding new signage and increasing the property’s newspaper and on-line presence. The operating general partner is also using a tenant referral incentive to help increase occupancy. In addition, management has focused on reducing operating expenses. However, the property operated below breakeven through the first quarter of 2013. The mortgage, property taxes, and insurance are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2016.

Hawthorne Associates, LP (Sandalwood Apartments) is a 20-unit property located in Toppenish, Washington. As of December 31, 2012, occupancy was 100% and the property operated above the breakeven. Through the first quarter of 2013, average physical occupancy continues to be strong at 95% and the property is now operating slightly above breakeven. Improved operations are due to higher occupancy and better rent collection. If occupancy levels are maintained, management is optimistic that the property will continue to operate above breakeven through 2013. In addition, the balance sheet is strong with sufficient operating cash to cover all accrued expenses and accounts payable. All required reserves are fully funded. The taxes, mortgage and insurance are all current. The low income tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2015.

Bienville Partnership, A L.P. (Bienville Apartments) is a 32-unit family property in Ringgold, Louisiana. In April 2010, the operating general partner transferred its ownership interest in forty-three partnerships, including Bienville Apartments, to the replacement operating general partner, as part of an initiative to improve property operations and address critical deferred maintenance concerns. Although the operating losses at the site have continued to decline since the operating general partner interest was transferred, the property’s operations remained below breakeven in 2012. Property insurance costs increased substantially in 2012 and negatively impacted cash flow. According to management, rates have increased portfolio-wide due to the volume of claims filed in 2011. Management is now focused on educating the maintenance staff on preventative measures and decreasing rates by reducing the number of filed claims. The operating general partner intends to continue to fund deficits as needed. Although occupancy declined from 93% in 2011 to 89% in 2012, occupancy stabilized in the first quarter of 2013 at 100%. The investment general partner intends to continue to work with the operating general partner to improve resident selection. All real estate taxes, insurance, and mortgage payments are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2016.

Cranberry Cove Limited Partnership (Cranberry Cove Apartments) is a 28-unit property located in Beckley, West Virginia. Through the first quarter of 2013, the property was able to operate above breakeven due to increased management oversight. During the first quarter, the operating general partner hired a well regarded management company in a consulting capacity to help improve operations at the property. Occupancy improved throughout the first quarter and was 93% in March 2013. The property has also been able to mitigate operating expenses through the first quarter by carefully monitoring costs, and all capital expenditures going forward will be funded through replacement reserve funds versus through operations. The property has also benefitted from USDA-RD rental assistance on eight units, which has helped stabilize occupancy. The operating general partner is also exploring the possibility of bringing in a replacement operating general partner during the second quarter of 2013. Assuming the operating general partner transfer takes place, the well regarded management company intends to take over management of the property. The investment general partner will work closely with management to improve operations and vet any prospective new partners. All mortgage, real estate tax, and insurance payments are current.

(Series 42). As of March 31, 2013 and 2012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 21 properties at March 31, 2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 the series, in total, generated $(1,350,231) and $(994,217), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and and also provided $0.77 and $0.92, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2013 and 2012 Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 42 was $109,918 and $1,676,228, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 the net income (loss) of the series was $(1,816,283) and $(2,368,983), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee and impairment losses.

Commerce Parkway Limited Dividend Housing Associates (Park Meadows Apartments) is an 80-unit family property located in Gaylord, Michigan.  The property had declining occupancy which led to below breakeven operations in 2012.  The Gaylord, Michigan economy was weak in 2012 and several tenants lost their jobs as a result.  In addition, there are two new LIHTC projects that recently opened in the market along with two others under construction. The two new projects are located within three miles of Commerce Parkway and are contributing to the declining occupancy. In 2012, occupancy averaged 88% and as of March 31, 2013 occupancy was 79%. In the first quarter of 2013, operating expenses were a challenge. The property experienced higher than average turnover due to evictions for non-payment of rent, which in turn increased maintenance costs. Increased marketing efforts have contributed to higher than budgeted administrative costs. The operating general partner stated that continuing to increase the marketing budget will not counter the flow of tenants to the upgraded amenities at the newer properties. Only an increased renter pool as a result of an improved economy will reverse this trend. The mortgage, taxes and insurance are current.  On December 31, 2011, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Commerce Parkway Limited Dividend Housing Associates.

Wingfield Apartments Partnership II LP (Wingfield Apartments II) is a 42-unit property in Kinder, Louisiana. In 2012, the property averaged 80% occupancy and operated below breakeven. Management reported that the most significant barrier to achieving stabilized occupancy was unqualified applicants. Nearby casinos employ a large portion of the population in the area. However, casinos tend to pay higher wages, which disqualifies their employees as residents because the employees exceed the income limitations. The onsite management team continues to offer move-in incentives to encourage qualified applicants to lease. The investment general partner conducted a site visit in May 2012 and found the property in good condition. The investment general partner is scheduled to return to the site in June 2013. As of March 31, 2013, the property was 86% occupied and operating below breakeven. The operating general partner has stated that the projected 2013 operating deficit will be funded by deferring affiliated management fees and, if necessary, funds will be advanced to the Operating Partnership. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2016. All mortgage and tax, and insurance payments are current.

Dorchester Court Limited Dividend Housing Association, LP (Dorchester Court Apartments) is a 131-unit apartment complex located in Port Huron, MI, with 75% of the units devoted to elderly housing. Due to construction delays and slow initial lease-up, the property experienced difficulty generating positive cash flow from the onset. Further, one of the two original members of the operating general partner entity was unable to contribute his share of the advances required under the operating deficit guarantee. In July 2005, that member was replaced and a new member was admitted as the second member of the operating general partner entity. Although the new second member did not assume the obligations of the guarantor, it had significant resources and contributed over $190,000 to the Operating Partnership to fund the property’s operating deficits during the 2006-2007 periods. In 2008, however, growing tensions between the two members resulted in less attention to management of the property and diminished willingness of the operating general partner to fund deficits. In May 2009, the Operating Partnership approved the transfer of interests within the operating general partner entity; the new second member transferred its interest to the remaining single member. As noted above, the members had been at odds and the transfer was deemed likely to clarify control of the entity and result in improved performance of the property. In addition, the management company was replaced in May 2009 with a management company affiliated with the remaining single member of the operating general partner.

Average occupancy improved to 99% in the first quarter of 2013, compared to 93% and 88% in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Also, the property operated above breakeven in the first quarter of 2013 and during 2012 after operating below breakeven in 2011. The improvement in operations was primarily due to increased net rental income from lower vacancies as well as lower maintenance expenses. Management has been effective as it continues marketing heavily throughout the area to improve occupancy. A fire occurred on December 25, 2010 that resulted in fire and water damage to one unit and water damage to two other units and some hallways. No residents were injured in the fire. Rehabilitation of these units was completed in the fourth quarter of 2011. The damages were covered under the Operating Partnership’s property insurance. The Operating Partnership has been funding the replacement reserve in accordance with the loan and Operating Partnership agreements. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2018. Mortgage, real estate tax and insurance payments are all current as of March 31, 2013.

In June 2012, the investment general partners of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III LP - Series 19 and Series 24 and Series 42 transferred their respective interests in Jeremy Associates LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,804,427 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $18,200, $4,536, and $2,264, for Series 19, Series 24 and Series 42, respectively. Of the total proceeds received $13,200, $4,536, and $2,264, for Series 19, Series 24 and Series 42, respectively, represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the respective investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. No proceeds were returned to cash reserves held by Series 19, Series 24 and Series 42, respectively. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership was recorded as of June 30, 2012.

Lynnelle Landing Limited Partnership (Lynnelle Landing Apartments) is a 56-unit property located in Charleston, West Virginia. The property continued to operate below breakeven through the first quarter of 2013 as a result of low average occupancy of 87% and high unit turnover costs. However, occupancy rebounded in March, ending the quarter at 95%. The investment general partner conducted a site inspection subsequent to the end of the first quarter and found the property was in overall good condition, but suggested a few management changes to help improve operations. The suggestions included adding credit checks to the resident screening process to help improve the quality of tenants and establishing a firm collections policy to improve revenue. Management indicated they will be conducting quarterly occupied inspections to view the condition of the units and charge for any damages that occurred as a result of the residents; this should prevent future high turn costs like those experienced in 2012. During the first quarter, the operating general partner hired a well regarded management company in a consulting capacity to help improve operations at the property. The property was able to secure lower insurance premiums by utilizing the new management’s insurance provider. With additional management oversight and changes to the screening policy and collections policy, the investment general partner expects the property’s operations to rebound. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits despite the expiration of his operating deficit guarantee. All mortgage, real estate tax, and insurance payments are current.

(Series 43) As of March 31, 2013 and 2012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 23 properties as of March 31, 2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 the series, in total, generated $(1,070,334) and $(746,314), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.90 and $0.93, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 43 was $1,467,908 and $4,021,942, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(2,884,319) and $(3,114,804), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, impairment loss, and amortization of acquisition costs.

Dorchester Court Limited Dividend Housing Association, LP (Dorchester Court Apartments) is a 131-unit apartment complex located in Port Huron, MI, with 75% of the units devoted to elderly housing. Due to construction delays and slow initial lease-up, the property experienced difficulty generating positive cash flow from the onset. Further, one of the two original members of the operating general partner entity was unable to contribute his share of the advances required under the operating deficit guarantee. In July 2005, that member was replaced and a new member was admitted as the second member of the operating general partner entity. Although the new second member did not assume the obligations of the guarantor, it had significant resources and contributed over $190,000 to the Operating Partnership to fund the property’s operating deficits during the 2006-2007 periods. In 2008, however, growing tensions between the two members resulted in less attention to management of the property and diminished willingness of the operating general partner to fund deficits. In May 2009, the Operating Partnership approved the transfer of interests within the operating general partner entity; the new second member transferred its interest to the remaining single member. As noted above, the members had been at odds and the transfer was deemed likely to clarify control of the entity and result in improved performance of the property. In addition, the management company was replaced in May 2009 with a management company affiliated with the remaining single member of the operating general partner.

Average occupancy improved to 99% in the first quarter of 2013, compared to 93% and 88% in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Also, the property operated above breakeven in the first quarter of 2013 and during 2012 after operating below breakeven in 2011. The improvement in operations was primarily due to increased net rental income from lower vacancies as well as lower maintenance expenses. Management has been effective as it continues marketing heavily throughout the area to improve occupancy. A fire occurred on December 25, 2010 that resulted in fire and water damage to one unit and water damage to two other units and some hallways. No residents were injured in the fire. Rehabilitation of these units was completed in the fourth quarter of 2011. The damages were covered under the Operating Partnership’s property insurance. The Operating Partnership has been funding the replacement reserve in accordance with the loan and Operating Partnership agreements. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2018. Mortgage, real estate tax and insurance payments are all current as of March 31, 2013.

Carpenter School I Elderly Apartments, LP (Carpenter School I Elderly Apartments) is a 38-unit property located in Natchez, Mississippi. The property averaged 98% occupancy in 2012 but operated below breakeven. Through the first quarter of 2013, average occupancy was 93% and the property operated slightly above breakeven due to what is likely a temporary drop in expenses caused by seasonality. The property struggles to generate cash flow as its effective rents are low and cannot support its expenses. The management company continues to market the available units by working closely with the housing authority and by employing various marketing efforts to attract qualified residents. Marketing consists of advertisements in the local newspaper and distributing fliers to local business, churches, and schools. The mortgage, real estate taxes, insurance, and account payables are all current.

Parkside Plaza, L.P. (Parkside Plaza Apartments) is a 35-unit co-op property in Harlem, New York. The property operated below breakeven from 2005 – 2008 due to high utility, maintenance and administrative expenses combined with collection loss. Operations improved to above breakeven status in 2009. Due to high bad debt and operating expenses, the property operated slightly below breakeven in 2010. Excessive receivables and accounts payable continued to impact operations as the property operated significantly below breakeven in 2011. The deficit was funded by drawing down $46,000 of operating reserves in addition to accruing another $45,000 of payables. In 2012 the property operated above breakeven, generating $62,000 of surplus cash. In 2011 the property wrote off $83,705 in bad debt. Tenant receivables as of December 31, 2012, were $19,520, which represented a decrease of $9,000 over the tenant receivables at year-end 2011. Vendor payables decreased by $41,000 in 2012 over 2011, but accrued expenses still remain high. The first quarter unaudited financial statements reflect above breakeven operations. Occupancy remained at 100% as of March 31, 2013. Despite operating expenses slightly increasing during the first quarter from recognizing the annual audit expense, the strong occupancy at the property contributed to accretive net operating income. Management has confirmed that the mortgage and insurance are current, the property is tax exempt. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2015.

Alexander Mills, Limited Partnership (Alexander Mills Apartments) is a 224-unit family property located approximately 30 miles northeast of Atlanta, in Lawrenceville, GA. Occupancy, which averaged 94% during 2008, began to decline in the fourth quarter of 2008, reaching 89% occupancy in December 2008. Occupancy was relatively stable during 2009 and the first half of 2010 at 90%, but this could only be achieved with rent concessions. During the third and fourth quarters of 2010 occupancy regressed to levels not seen since July 2009 and only averaged 85% and 83%, respectively, and ended 2010 at 83% occupancy due to move-outs, evictions and fewer new leases. The major employers in the area cut either staffing levels or worker’s hours and this situation had not started to improve as of December 31, 2010. Since most residents of Alexander Mills are hourly employees, those who retained their jobs had their income significantly reduced. Also, the significant decline in the construction industry in the Atlanta Metro area led to additional vacancies at the site. Management was very proactive in managing expenses, collecting tenant receivables, and developing rent payment workout plans to retain residents where possible. In spite of these efforts, the management company reported a material increase in bad debt expense in the second quarter of 2010. Bad debt expense did decline in the third and fourth quarters of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2010; however, it was still significantly above what would be considered normal for a multi-family apartment community. The investment general partner performed a site visit in January 2012 and revisited the property in January 2013. The property was found to be in good physical condition. The investment general partner intends to continue to monitor operations until they are stabilized with above breakeven operations.

The September 2009 mortgage payment was late and the operating general partner indicated it was unwilling to continue to advance funds to subsidize the Operating Partnership’s below breakeven operations. In addition, the operating general partner hoped that its decision to stop mortgage payments would trigger negotiations with the first mortgage lender on a possible loan restructure or forbearance agreement. This tactic resulted in a forbearance agreement that closed on April 13, 2010, and converted the loan to an interest only payment schedule through December 31, 2011, at which time the contractual mortgage amortization restarted. At closing on the forbearance agreement, the past due interest was paid and a $200,000 operating deficit reserve was established. At the time the forbearance agreement closed in April 2010, the investment general partner expected that property operations would be able to pay the interest only debt service payments through year end 2011 without needing to access monies in the newly established operating deficit reserve. That did not turn out to be the case as operations at Alexander Mills deteriorated over the second half of 2010 due to general weakness in the Lawrenceville, GA sub-market as evidenced by low physical and economic occupancy at the property and resulting incremental costs for bad debt, evictions and unit turn expenses. As of December 31, 2011, the balance in the operating deficit reserve was fully depleted.

In the first quarter 2011 there were signs that the local economy was improving as occupancy increased to 90% from 83% in the fourth quarter 2010 and negative cash flow declined to ($29,000) for the first quarter 2011. This improvement in market conditions continued in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2011 as physical occupancy improved to average 95%, 94% and 96%, respectively. For the last two months of the second quarter of 2011 and all of the third and fourth quarters of 2011, the property operated at a breakeven level. While the rental market started to improve in the first half of 2011, and continued to improve in the second half of 2011 and through the first half of 2012, operations at Alexander Mills were not strong enough at the start of 2012 to pay debt service including amortization which re-started with the February 1, 2012 mortgage payment. The operating general partner forecasted a cash flow deficit of $150,000 to $180,000 in 2012. As calendar year 2012 began, the operating general partner and the investment general partner agreed to start the year funding deficits on a month by month basis by reducing the property management fee to 3% (from 5%) and making advances from fund reserves while monitoring the local apartment market. Through December 31, 2012, $152,422 from fund reserves had been advanced to the Operating Partnership to keep the mortgage current during 2012. For 2013, the operating general partner has forecast a deficit of approximately $85,000 - $100,000 after the operating general partner agreed to continue charging the reduced 3% management fee. The investment general partner has also decided to start 2013 again utilizing fund reserves to finance deficits and keep the mortgage current. As of March 31, 2013, only $38,472 had been advanced from fund reserves in 2013 as a result of improved occupancy of 96% in the first quarter of 2013 and bad debt expense declining to only 2.2% of net rental income. If market conditions and property operations start to deteriorate at any point during 2013, or the investment general partner determines that fund reserves are no longer available to finance monthly deficits at Alexander Mills, the Operating Partnership faces a high probability of a mortgage payment default, a resulting foreclosure and potential recapture costs in 2013. If recapture was to occur in 2013, the Operating Partnership would lose future tax credits of $83,550, and incur recapture and interest penalty costs of $983,316, equivalent to approximately $23 and $270 per 1,000 BACs respectively. If recapture was to be delayed to 2014, the Operating Partnership would have no remaining future tax credits to lose; however, it would incur recapture and interest penalty costs of $835,507, equivalent to approximately $229 per 1,000 BACs.

Due to the aforementioned risks, the operating general partner contacted the loan servicer in May 2011 to initiate conversations about extending the expiration date of the existing forbearance period or amending the mortgage loan terms in some other fashion. In June 2011, the loan was transferred to the special servicer to address the operating general partner’s request. The investment general partner and the operating general partner negotiated with the special servicer throughout the fourth quarter of 2011; however, these negotiations were unsuccessful and the loan terms remained unchanged. The mortgage payment, real estate taxes and insurance payments were current as of March 31, 2013.

Henderson Fountainhead L.P., A Texas Limited Partnership (Seven Points Apartments) is a 36-unit family property in Seven Points, Texas. The property continued to operate below breakeven in 2012 due to increased maintenance expenses associated with making vacant units rent ready. Although vacancy declined in 2012, the average annual occupancy remained low at 88%. Furthermore, occupancy declined to 64% in December 2012 after management eliminated all move-in concessions. To remain competitive in the marketplace, management has increased its community outreach efforts to social service providers. In addition, print advertisements are regularly circulated in the local newspapers. Consequently, occupancy improved to 87% in the first quarter of 2013, ending March at 86%. The investment general partner intends to work with the operating general partner to improve resident selection, reduce maintenance expenses, and increase occupancy. The operating general partner will continue to fund deficits. All real estate taxes, insurance, and mortgage payments are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2017.

Bohannon Place, Limited (Bohannon Place Apartments) is a 12-unit family property in Bowling Green, KY.  The property operated at a ($4,400) deficit in 2012 due to a bed bug issue that caused low occupancy and increased maintenance costs related to efforts to remedy the problem. Bad debt has also been an issue as the property was only able to achieve 70% economic occupancy in 2012.  However, management is projecting the property to operate above breakeven in 2013 with improved occupancy and reduced expenses.  In 2012, occupancy averaged 87% and has continued to decrease through the first quarter of 2013 to an average of 81% as of March 31, 2013. Management states that the occupancy has reached 100% as of May 2013. The operating deficit guarantee expires July 31, 2014. The 2012 deficits were funded by deferring required replacement reserve deposits and utilizing $7,000 of reserve funds. Boston Capital had the property secretly shopped in the first quarter of 2013, which revealed poor results with staffing and a low level of professionalism.  Subsequently, the regional manager stated that a new site manager was hired. All mortgage, taxes and insurance are current through March 31, 2013.  The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2017.

(Series 44) As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 10 properties at March 31, 2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 the series, in total, generated $(2,137,461) and $(819,364), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.86 and $0.97, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 44 was $1,079,218 and $2,365,868, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share

of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(1,930,330) and $(3,379,213), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, impairment losses and amortization of acquisition costs.

Brookside Park Limited Partnership (Brookside Park Apartments) is a 200-unit family property in Atlanta, Georgia. Occupancy fell to a low of 89% in March 2007, as a result of crime in the surrounding neighborhood. Management responded by replacing chain link fencing with more durable hard fence, thinning shrub cover and installing alarm systems in every unit. Due to an operating general partnership transfer in June of 2008, the new operating general partner agreed to extend the operating deficit guarantee through June of 2011. The operating general partner continued to fund all deficits through the end of 2011 even though its operating deficit guarantee expired. The operating deficits in 2009, 2010 and 2011 were ($76,000), ($132,000) and ($123,000), respectively. In early January of 2012, the operating general partner informed the investment general partner that its willingness to continue to fund operating deficits for the remainder of the compliance period would be limited. Both parties discussed scenarios to evaluate additional funding sources for 2012 and beyond. Although no agreement was reached between the operating general partner and the investment general partner during 2012, the operating general partner continued to fund $242,489 of deficits through the December 1, 2012 mortgage payment; however, the deficit funding stopped for the January 1, 2013 mortgage payment. As a result, the mortgage bonds are currently in default. The operating general partner intends to either transfer its general partner interest to the investment general partner or transfer the property to the lender in a deed in lieu of a foreclosure transaction if the investment general partner elects not to become the operating general partner due to the forecast of unending operating deficits that would need to be funded through the end of the tax credit compliance period on December 31, 2019, or the unwillingness of the servicing agent for the mortgage bonds, to meaningfully re-structure the payment terms on the mortgage bonds. During the first quarter of 2013 and the first month of the second quarter of 2013, the investment general partner has been in negotiations with the servicing agent and the syndicator of the state tax credits for Brookside Park Limited Partnership, in an attempt to re-structure the mortgage bonds and avoid foreclosure and possible recapture. In late March 2013, the servicing agent indicated a willingness to redeem and then reissue the mortgage bonds with more favorable payment terms. The servicing agent estimated the cost of this re-issuance at $400,000 - $500,000. These are costs that would have to be paid by the Operating Partnership and shared by the state and federal tax credit investors. The investment general partner is investigating selling some or all of the remaining federal tax credits to source the federal tax credit investors’ share of the new capital needed in order to: a) cure the existing mortgage bond default, b) facilitate the redemption and re-issuance of the mortgage bonds, and c) avoid foreclosure and the accompanying recapture costs. This means that all or a portion of the existing investment limited partner’s interest in Brookside Park Limited Partnership may need to be sold in order raise capital to avoid foreclosure and recapture.

Occupancy improved in 2010 averaging 94% and remained strong during 2011 and 2012 averaging 94%. Occupancy in the first quarter of 2013 declined nominally to 93%. Currently, management offers a move-in special on the two-bedroom terrace level apartments where prospective tenants will pay a reduced rent of $699 for the first six months, and the regular rate of $745 for the remainder of the year lease. Management continues to market the property by distributing fliers to local and city businesses, using on-line advertising sites, and leaving property information at the local housing authority for recent voucher recipients. Recently, the property partnered with Community Connections, a social service organization. During the fourth quarter of 2009, management implemented a surety bond as an incentive for new residents. The residents will pay a minimal amount for a surety bond as opposed to a higher amount for a security deposit. The property will receive a guarantee that the surety bond, limited to the bond cap amount, will cover all damage incurred to a unit.

Management hired a new leasing consultant in May 2011 to aid in further improving occupancy. The operating general partner hired a new regional director of operations in the fourth quarter of 2011 to oversee its Georgia portfolio. Though occupancy remains strong, the property continued to operate below breakeven in 2011, 2012 and the first quarter of 2013. This decline in cash flow is attributable to high tenant receivables, bad debt expense, higher than budgeted vacancy losses, rental concessions, and high utility costs. In June 2012 the operating general partner decided to change the property management company responsible for managing its apartment portfolio in the Southeastern United States including Brookside Park. The effective date of the management change was August 15, 2012. The investment general partner had previously indicated that it intended to monitor this change to determine whether the new management company would be able to deliver better operating results for Brookside Park. This was after the Operating Partnership reported negative cash flow in each year from 2008 - 2012. After funding these deficits since 2008, the operating general partner notified the investment general partner in December 2012 that it had been unsuccessful in its attempt to negotiate a loan modification with the servicer of the mortgage bonds that finance Brookside Park Apartments and that it would no longer fund deficits. As a result, there was a payment default in January 2013 and the servicer sent the Operating Partnership a default notice on January 14, 2013. The cure period for the subject default ended on February 1, 2013 without the default being cured. If the investment general partner is unable to negotiate a loan modification or forbearance agreement with the servicer for the mortgage bonds, there is a high probability that the mortgage will be foreclosed in 2013. The property’s real estate tax and insurance payments were current as of March 31, 2013. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2019. If recapture were to occur in 2013, the Operating Partnership would lose future tax credits of $45,499, and incur recapture and interest penalty costs of $51,966, equivalent to approximately $17 and $19 per 1,000 BACs respectively. If recapture were to occur in 2014, the Operating Partnership would lose future tax credits of $27,713, and incur recapture and interest penalty costs of $59,658, equivalent to approximately $10 and $22 per 1,000 BACs respectively.

Alexander Mills, Limited Partnership (Alexander Mills Apartments) is a 224-unit family property located approximately 30 miles northeast of Atlanta, in Lawrenceville, GA. Occupancy, which averaged 94% during 2008, began to decline in the fourth quarter of 2008, reaching 89% occupancy in December 2008. Occupancy was relatively stable during 2009 and the first half of 2010 at 90%, but this could only be achieved with rent concessions. During the third and fourth quarters of 2010 occupancy regressed to levels not seen since July 2009 and only averaged 85% and 83%, respectively, and ended 2010 at 83% occupancy due to move-outs, evictions and fewer new leases. The major employers in the area cut either staffing levels or worker’s hours and this situation had not started to improve as of December 31, 2010. Since most residents of Alexander Mills are hourly employees, those who retained their jobs had their income significantly reduced. Also, the significant decline in the construction industry in the Atlanta Metro area led to additional vacancies at the site. Management was very proactive in managing expenses, collecting tenant receivables, and developing rent payment workout plans to retain residents where possible. In spite of these efforts, the management company reported a material increase in bad debt expense in the second quarter of 2010. Bad debt expense did decline in the third and fourth quarters of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2010; however, it was still significantly above what would be considered normal for a multi-family apartment community. The investment general partner performed a site visit in January 2012 and revisited the property in January 2013. The property was found to be in good physical condition. The investment general partner intends to continue to monitor operations until they are stabilized with above breakeven operations.

The September 2009 mortgage payment was late and the operating general partner indicated it was unwilling to continue to advance funds to subsidize the Operating Partnership’s below breakeven operations. In addition, the operating general partner hoped that its decision to stop mortgage payments would trigger negotiations with the first mortgage lender on a possible loan restructure or forbearance agreement. This tactic resulted in a forbearance agreement that closed on April 13, 2010, and converted the loan to an interest only payment schedule through December 31, 2011, at which time the contractual mortgage amortization restarted. At closing on the forbearance agreement, the past due interest was paid and a $200,000 operating deficit reserve was established. At the time the forbearance agreement closed in April 2010, the investment general partner expected that property operations would be able to pay the interest only debt service payments through year end 2011 without needing to access monies in the newly established operating deficit reserve. That did not turn out to be the case as operations at Alexander Mills deteriorated over the second half of 2010 due to general weakness in the Lawrenceville, GA sub-market as evidenced by low physical and economic occupancy at the property and resulting incremental costs for bad debt, evictions and unit turn expenses. As of December 31, 2011, the balance in the operating deficit reserve was fully depleted.

In the first quarter 2011 there were signs that the local economy was improving as occupancy increased to 90% from 83% in the fourth quarter 2010 and negative cash flow declined to ($29,000) for the first quarter 2011. This improvement in market conditions continued in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2011 as physical occupancy improved to average 95%, 94% and 96%, respectively. For the last two months of the second quarter of 2011 and all of the third and fourth quarters of 2011, the property operated at a breakeven level. While the rental market started to improve in the first half of 2011, and continued to improve in the second half of 2011 and through the first half of 2012, operations at Alexander Mills were not strong enough at the start of 2012 to pay debt service including amortization which restarted with the February 1, 2012 mortgage payment. The operating general partner forecasted a cash flow deficit of $150,000 to $180,000 in 2012. As calendar year 2012 began, the operating general partner and the investment general partner agreed to start the year funding deficits on a month by month basis by reducing the property management fee to 3% (from 5%) and making advances from fund reserves while monitoring the local apartment market. Through December 31, 2012, $152,422 from fund reserves had been advanced to the Operating Partnership to keep the mortgage current during 2012. For 2013, the operating general partner has forecast a deficit of approximately $85,000 - $100,000 after the operating general partner agreed to continue charging the reduced 3% management fee. The investment general partner has also decided to start 2013 again utilizing fund reserves to finance deficits and keep the mortgage current. As of March 31, 2013, only $38,472 had been advanced from fund reserves in 2013 as a result of improved occupancy of 96% in the first quarter of 2013 and bad debt expense declining to only 2.2% of net rental income. If market conditions and property operations start to deteriorate at any point during 2013, or the investment general partner determines that fund reserves are no longer available to finance monthly deficits at Alexander Mills, the Operating Partnership faces a high probability of a mortgage payment default, a resulting foreclosure and potential recapture costs in 2013. If recapture was to occur in 2013, the Operating Partnership would lose future tax credits of $102,121, and incur recapture and interest penalty costs of $1,201,863, equivalent to approximately $38 and $444 per 1,000 BACs respectively. If recapture was to be delayed to 2014, the Operating Partnership would have no remaining future tax credits to lose; however, it would incur recapture and interest penalty costs of $1,021,201, equivalent to approximately $378 per 1,000 BACs.

Due to the aforementioned risks, the operating general partner contacted the loan servicer in May 2011 to initiate conversations about extending the expiration date of the existing forbearance period or amending the mortgage loan terms in some other fashion. In June 2011, the loan was transferred to the special servicer to address the operating general partner’s request. The investment general partner and the operating general partner negotiated with the special servicer throughout the fourth quarter of 2011; however, these negotiations were unsuccessful and the loan terms remained unchanged. The mortgage payment, real estate taxes and insurance payments were current as of March 31, 2013.

United Development CO. 2001 LP (Memphis 102) is a 102-unit single family home scattered site development, located in Memphis, TN. Due to a downturn in the local economy and rising unemployment, average occupancy has suffered at Memphis 102 since 2007. Average occupancy fell significantly in recent years, averaging 72% in the first quarter of 2013 and 68% and 76% in 2012 and 2011, respectively, due to the continuing downward trends in the rental market and the lack of job opportunities in Memphis. Also, for a period of time in 2011 Section 8 vouchers were unavailable from the Memphis Housing Authority due to the operating general partner not being current on the real estate taxes owed by Memphis 102. In late 2011, the Housing Authority once again started to refer Section 8 voucher holders to Memphis 102. Management has recently increased its advertising and marketing efforts and continues to offer rental concessions; however, occupancy remains a significant challenge for the property. In 2012 the property continued to operate significantly below breakeven due to high real estate taxes and accompanying interest charges and penalties, as well as high maintenance expenses and bad debt. In 2011, net cash flow expended by property operations totaled ($204,196) again due to high real estate taxes, maintenance expenses and bad debt charges. Negative operations in 2012 and 2011 were funded primarily by the accrual of real estate taxes and accompanying interest and other penalties levied by the City of Memphis and Shelby County, as well as by net advances (approximately $21,000 in 2011) from the operating general partner and its affiliates.

During a site visit to the property in August 2011, the investment general partner noted that the management company, an affiliate of the operating general partner, lacked certain internal controls, communication, and structure to provide accurate and timely reporting. It was also noted that the weak economy and lack of job opportunities in the Memphis area have continued to negatively impact occupancy. Furthermore, the operating general partner indicated that it was negotiating with City and County officials on a repayment plan for outstanding real estate taxes which have been accruing for most of Memphis 102 individual tax parcels since 2006. The estimated accrued real estate tax liability for Memphis 102 totals approximately $770,000 as of March 31, 2013.

On September 2, 2011, the lender filed a complaint with the Chancery Court of Shelby County, TN requesting the appointment of a receiver for Memphis 102 and four other unrelated LIHTC partnerships of the operating general partner primarily due to significant unpaid real estate taxes and incomplete reporting. A hearing was originally scheduled for September 21, 2011. The attorneys representing the operating general partner negotiated with the lender and obtained several continuances of the hearing. As conditions of these continuances, the lender required that Memphis 102 and the four other unrelated LIHTC partnerships meet certain conditions, including: 1) providing complete information on the status of past due real estate taxes for all properties, 2) obtaining written agreements with the County and City to stay all tax sales, 3) executing and complying with repayment plans for the real estate tax liabilities with both the City and Shelby County, and 4) installing new operating and financial management controls at the management company in order to provide reporting satisfactory to the lender.

As of late November 2012, Memphis 102 and the operating general partner had not completed these conditions to the satisfaction of the lender. As a result, the lender filed an amended complaint on November 29, 2012 requesting the appointment of a receiver for Memphis 102 and the four other unrelated LIHTC partnerships controlled by the operating general partner. On January 23, 2013 a receiver (“Receiver”) was appointed by the Court for Memphis 102. Note that the investment general partner did not object to this action by the lender.

In early February 2013, the Receiver hired a third party management company to manage the property. The new management company inspected each unit and issued a report indicating that occupancy was 72% and that deferred maintenance totaling approximately $212,000 was needed to make the 28 vacant units rent ready. Also, in early February 2013, the Receiver became aware of numerous 8823s that had been issued to the Operating Partnership by a state agency relating to a March 27, 2012 inspection which noted several issues of noncompliance which had not been responded to by the operating general partner. After a review by the Receiver and the investment general partner it was determined that the Operating Partnership will recognize recapture in 2012 totaling $281,707, equivalent to $104 per 1,000 BACs.

The Receiver was also given broad authority by the Court to sell the property through a receivership sale, which will legally leave the land use and regulatory agreement in place with all requirements under Section 42. As of June 20, 2013, the Receiver continues to negotiate with potential buyers but has not reached an agreement with any potential buyer on sale terms. The offers that have been received are substantially less than the outstanding mortgage debt and accrued real estate taxes. The lender has indicated that it would accept a discounted payment of the outstanding mortgage debt to allow the sale of the property to take place. If the property was to be sold in 2013, the Operating Partnership would not receive a portion of the tax credits scheduled to be delivered in 2013 depending on the sale date (i.e. a potential sale of the property that would occur effective September 30, 2013 would result in an estimated tax credit loss of $84,848, which is equivalent to a tax credit loss of $32 per 1,000 BACs). If the property is sold and continues to be operated according to Section 42, the Operating Partnership would not incur tax credit recapture and interest penalties as a result of the sale of the property.

Insurance payments were current as of March 31, 2013; however, mortgage payments and real estate taxes were not current as of this date. The most recent mortgage payment was made in January 2013 and the last year real estate taxes were paid was before 2006. These two deficiencies represent undeclared defaults on the mortgage. Furthermore, in May 2013 the Receiver was notified by the Shelby County Treasurer that due to the significant delinquent real estate taxes it will begin the tax lien sale process for each of the 102 homes, pending the receivership sale. The lender has indicated that it would not make a protective advance to pay the delinquent real estate taxes to avoid tax lien sales of the homes. Consequently, if a receivership sale of the property does not take place and the property is either foreclosed in 2013 or lost through tax lien sales, the estimated credit loss of $490,439 and tax credit recapture cost and interest penalty of $1,652,686 is equivalent to a credit loss of $181 per 1,000 BACs and tax credit recapture and interest penalties of $612 per 1,000 BACs. As mentioned above, the low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2018.

United Development Limited Partnership 2001 (Families First II) is a 66-unit single family development, located in West Memphis, AR. Average occupancy is not strong due to continued weakness in the local economy and ineffectiveness of prior management (further discussed below). Average occupancy was 85% as of March 31, 2013 after averaging 80% and 85% in 2012 and 2011, respectively. The property has seen an increase in bad debt resulting from job loss and reduction in take-home pay among current residents. Although the property was able to generate a small positive cash flow in 2011, it operated below breakeven during 2012 and in the first quarter of 2013. These deficits were primarily financed by an increase in the accounts payables balance. On March 26, 2013, the investment general partner removed the property management company affiliated with the operating general partner and replaced it with a third party property management company due to ineffective and underachieving operations as well as incomplete and untimely reporting by previous management. The mortgage payments, real estate taxes and insurance are current as of March 31, 2013. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2018.

(Series 45) As of March 31, 2013 and 2012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 30 properties as of March 31, 2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 the series, in total, generated $(1,650,716) and $(1,653,370), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.95 for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 45 was $4,953,547 and $8,228,807, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(3,626,224) and $(5,737,784), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, impairment losses and amortization of acquisition costs.

Baldwin Villas Limited Partnership (Baldwin Villas) is a 65-unit property located in Pontiac, MI. The project consists of three and four-bedroom single family rental homes, with a home ownership option available to qualifying tenants. Because the cost to build the project approximated the cost for a single-family development, construction of the project required a significant amount of debt. As a result, the rent structure required to support the project is high, and most tenants need significant subsidies to afford the $900+/per month rents. The property has experienced a significant decline in operations and cash flow since 2006. As of March 31, 2013, Baldwin Villas had significant unpaid debt service obligations, accrued real estate taxes, and operating payables. It also had a list of deferred maintenance items that could not be addressed due to the property’s weak operating cash flow.

Since 2008, Baldwin Villas has had numerous monetary and technical defaults on its first mortgage debt. The Operating Partnership obtained the initial funding for this project from variable rate bonds issued by the state housing authority. These bonds were secured by an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a local bank. The letter of credit fee, which had been accruing at approximately $33,000 per quarter, totaled approximately $213,000 on August 30, 2011 when the letter of credit was drawn on and the bonds were paid in full. This event converted the original bond financing for the Operating Partnership to a traditional commercial mortgage loan.

 

On August 30, 2011, Baldwin Villas entered into a Settlement Agreement with the lender resulting in a new mortgage note being issued which is guaranteed by the operating general partner and its principals. Under the terms of the new mortgage note, the principal balance outstanding for the loan was confirmed at $4,809,749. In addition, there is a deferred amount owed to the bank for unpaid letter of credit fees and other bank costs (e.g. legal costs) of $459,856. The interest rate on the new mortgage note was set at 2% over prime. The note has a maturity date of June 30, 2013, and monthly installments of $35,000 that commenced on October 22, 2011. According to the Settlement Agreement, Baldwin Villas was required to make $30,000 installment payments in August and September 2011 to pay down the principal balance of the new mortgage note, as well as pay the 2009, 2010 and 2011 outstanding real estate taxes based on an agreed upon payment schedule. In addition, one of the principals of the operating general partner iswas required to pay the lender an additional $400,000 toward the mortgage debt with two, $200,000 installment payments due on April 30, 2012 and November 30, 2012, respectively, from distributions or income from certain unrelated entities owned by that principal. Furthermore, as part of the Settlement Agreement, Baldwin Villas provided the lender with “consent and confession judgments” through the Circuit Court of Oakland County, MI, which, in the event of a default under the Settlement Agreement, would allow the lender to appoint a receiver who would have the authority to sell the property. The Settlement Agreement was executed without the knowledge or consent of the investment general partner.

The operating general partner has an unlimited operating deficit guaranty to provide operating deficit advances to the Operating Partnership. In February 2013 and February 2012, the operating general partner provided $109,055approximately $98,500 and $109,000, respectively, to pay the 2010 and 2009 outstanding real estate taxes, interest and penalties. InFurthermore, in the first quarter of 2013 and during 2012 and 2011, the operating general partner provided $146,382approximately $51,000, $448,500, and $146,500, respectively, of operating deficit advances to Baldwin Villas to satisfy the required payment obligations of the new mortgage note and settlement agreement. From inception through March 31, 2012,2013, the operating general partner has provided operating deficit advances to Baldwin Villas totaling $357,283.approximately $955,000. As of June 27, 2012May 7, 2013 the required monthly installment payments of the new mortgage note and settlement agreement have been made; however, the 20102012 and 2011 real estate taxes and related interest and penalties, totaling approximately $97,800$108,800 and $89,300,$104,800, respectively, have not been paid. Also, the operating general partner indicated that the April 20, 2012$200,000 installment payment ofoutlined above and due on April 30, 2012 has been paid; however, the $200,000 installment payment that was due from certain unrelated entities owned by a principal ofon November 30, 2012 has been delayed as the operating general partner has been paid.  Nocontinues to negotiate with the lender on an exit strategy for the property (discussed further below).  As of May 7, 2013, no default notice has been received by the partnershipOperating Partnership from the lender as of June 27, 2012.lender.

For the quarter ending March 31, 2012, average occupancy had further eroded to 67%.

Average occupancy decreased to 80%at the property for 2011the first quarter of 2013 was 64%, compared to 89% for 2010.65% and 79% in 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increased vacancy at the property is due to the continued poor local economy and limited job opportunities in the Pontiac area, as well as the lack of available funds to complete costly tenant turnovers, as further discussed below. The reported unemployment rate in Pontiac, MI for March 2012 was 21.1% compared to 8.8% for the State of Michigan. In recent years Section 8 vouchers have again become available and as of March 31, 20122013 approximately 40%65% of the property’s tenant base consists ofleased units are occupied by Section 8 voucher holders. Since 2009, management has tried to improve occupancy through working with the local housing authority to obtain voucher holder referrals, held several open houses, and increased online and newspaper advertisements. A new full time property manager was hired in January 2012.

 

The property has operated significantly below breakeven for the past few years. Operating expenses remain well above state averages due to the fact that the property consists of three and four-bedroom single-family homes. In previous years, maintenance expenses were very high due to extremely costly unit turnover expenses for these single-family homes. However, forin the first quarter ending March 31,of 2013 and during 2012 and in 2011, maintenance expenses had generally decreased due to poorlower occupancy and less cash flow available to address the property’s maintenance needs. Although there are qualified tenants available, vacancies continue to remain high due to the lack of available funds to complete the costly tenant turnovers. Utility expenses increased inhave been a problem at the quarter ending March 31, 2012, 2011 andproperty since 2010 duewhen occupancy started to decline as the chargesOperating Partnership is required to maintainpay for basic heating and lighting costs rather than tenants for increasing unoccupied homes.

the increased number of vacant units. This problem continued into the first quarter of 2013.

In January 2011, Baldwin Villas received a tax foreclosure notice from Oakland County regarding past due2008 real estate taxes.  Total taxes, interest and penalties of $105,695 were due on March 31, 2011 or the County had the right to take the property through foreclosure.  On March 16, 2011, the lender made a protective advance for the outstanding amount to prevent the property from being taken through foreclosure. The protective advance was added to the principal balance in the new mortgage note and Settlement Agreement discussed above.

 

ForIn recent years the Operating Partnership has experienced significant negative operations. In the first quarter ending March 31,of 2013 and in 2012, the Operating Partnership expended net cash flow of approximately ($95,000)130,000) and ($665,046), respectively, due to low occupancy and consequentlythe resulting low rental revenue, high debt service payment requirements from the Settlement Agreement, and high real estate taxes. Negative operations were primarily funded by advances from the operating general partner and accrual of real estate taxes. In 2011, the Operating Partnership has expended net cash flows of approximately ($606,688) funded primarily through the increase in mortgage debt from default fees from the Settlement Agreement and operating deficit advances from the operating general partner, as well as accruals of operating payables and real estate taxes. In 2010, the Operating Partnership expended net cash flows of ($306,845) funded primarily through increased accruals in operating payables, interest, letter of credit fees, and real estate taxes.

As noted above, the operating general partner reports that the lender has not yet issued a default notice to the Operating Partnership with regard to the new mortgage note and Settlement Agreement. Also, the operating general partner indicated that it is negotiating with the lender to extend or re-structure the new mortgage note that matures on June 30, 2013. As of March 2012,31, 2013, the Operating Partnership remains current on its property insurance obligations. Real estate taxes for 20112012 and 20102011 totaling approximately $185,000$213,600 remain unpaid. The operating general partner indicated that it did file appeals for the 20112012 and 20102011 real estate taxes, which are currently pending. The investment general partner continues to press the operating general partner to provide operating deficit advances to: 1) pay the mortgage obligations of the Settlement Agreement and real estate tax deficiencies, 2) pay down growing payables, and 3) fund deferred maintenance and tenant turnover expenses which will improve occupancy at the property. Also, the operating general partner is discussing a house by house sales effort that would be executed in coordination with a nonprofit affordable housing agency and the lender; all sales would be to low-income qualified homebuyers in order to avoid recapture costs for the investment limited partner. Note that the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period for Baldwin Villas expires on December 31, 2015. If the property is foreclosed in 2012,2013, the estimated tax credit recapture cost and interest penalty of $156,018$34,665 is equivalent to recapture and interest of $58$9 per 1,000 BACs.

Western Gardens Partnership (Western Gardens Apartments) is a 48-unit complex located in Dequincey, LA. In 2009, occupancy averaged 78% and the property operated below breakeven. In addition to the occupancy issues in 2009, maintenance costs increased 171% over 2008 figures. According to the operating general partner, the large increase in maintenance expenses was due to Rural Development required repairs. In 2010, occupancy averaged 76% and the property operated at breakeven. Occupancy steadily improved throughout most of 2011, from 63% at the end of the first quarter, to 79% at the end of the second quarter, to 85% at the end of the third quarter of 2011. At year-end the property was back down to 65% occupied. As of March 31, 2012, occupancy has improved to 88%. The investment general partner plans to continue to work with the operating general partner to further increase and stabilize occupancy. All tax, insurance and mortgage payments are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2015.

Sedgwick - Sundance Apartments, Limited Partnership (Sedgwick - Sundance Apartments) is a 24-unit senior property in Sedgwick, Kansas. A decline in occupancy in 2011 and insufficient rental rates resulted in below breakeven operations for the year. Despite an average annual occupancy of 92% in 2011, occupancy declined below 90% in the second half of the year due to a number of deaths and residents moving to assisted living facilities. In an effort to reduce vacancy, management has been actively marketing the area with fliers, cold calling local agencies, advertising in the local newspaper, and offering a $99 move-in special for the first month. Occupancy averaged 93% in the first quarter of 2012, ending March 2012 at 92%. Despite this improvement, operations have remained below breakeven through the first quarter of 2012. Kansas Housing approved the last rate increase in April 2011; management will continue to implement rent increases as they are allowed. The real estate taxes, mortgage and insurance are all current.

(Series 41) As of March 31, 2012 and 2011 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 20 properties at March 31, 2012, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the series, in total, generated $(1,729,160) and $(627,565), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.74 and $0.76, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 41 was $892,598 and $2,811,584, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the net income (loss) of the series was $(2,401,457) and $(2,025,799), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, impairment losses and amortization of acquisition costs.

Rural Housing Partners of Mt. Carroll, LP (Mill Creek Village) is a 12-unit family property in Mt. Carroll, IL. The property is located in a depressed rural area. Occupancy at the property averaged 71% in 2011 and was 75% as of March 31, 2012. The low occupancy in 2011 was the result of weak economic conditions in the area. Two of the units lost rental assistance from Rural Development several years ago because they were vacant for more than six months. It is now difficult to find tenants who can afford the rents of these two units without rental assistance. According to the operating general partner, there is little chance of regaining the lost rental assistance. As a result, the operating general partner has focused on reducing operating expenses. The property operated slightly above breakeven through the first quarter of 2012. The mortgage, property taxes, and insurance are current.

Rural Housing Partners of Fulton, LP (Palisades Park) is a 16-unit family property in Fulton, IL. The property is located in a depressed rural area and receives rental assistance from Rural Development. In 2011 the property operated with an average occupancy of 86%. Occupancy was 88% as of March 31, 2012. The low occupancy was the result of the poor economic condition of the surrounding area. Operations have been slightly above breakeven through the first quarter of 2012 as the operating general partner has focused on reducing expenses. The mortgage, property taxes and insurance are current.

Hawthorne Associates, LP (Sandalwood Apartments) is a 20-unit property located in Toppenish, Washington. As of December 31, 2011, occupancy is 90%, down from 95% at the end of September, 2011, with operations slightly below breakeven. In first quarter 2012, average occupancy improved to 90%; however, the property continues to operate slightly below breakeven due to collections issues. The rent collection and eviction policies are a focus for the management company and they are being strictly enforced. The taxes, mortgage and insurance are all current. The low income tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2015.

Bienville Partnership (Bienville Apartments) is a 32-unit complex in Ringgold, LA. In 2009, average occupancy declined to 79% and the property operated below breakeven. Poor management brought about security issues, deferred maintenance, and problems with resident retention. In April 2010, the investment general partner approved an operating general partner transfer to try and improve operations. The incoming operating general partner had the experience, personnel, and systems in place needed to bolster occupancy, increase resident retention, and address five years of deferred maintenance. To address security issues, management began working with local authorities, prompting police patrols to frequently drive through the property on random evenings. They also built a fence around the property, added high intensity exterior lighting, and closed off one entrance to the property to reduce drive-thru traffic. Security has since improved as a result of these efforts. Management continues to focus on leasing and marketing, and requires that the site manager and supervisor submit a written rent-up plan for review by senior management to help understand how current marketing efforts are working. Occupancy increased in 2010 and 2011, to an average of 88% and 93%, respectively. Through the first quarter of 2012, occupancy has averaged 93%, with current occupancy at 91% as of March 31, 2012. While operations have improved since the operating general partner transfer, the property continues to operate below breakeven from high maintenance expenses, as management continues to address five years of deferred maintenance at the property. The operating general partner states that they expect high maintenance expenses to continue decreasing, as there have been improvements in the annual audits performed by Rural Development, which outline any required maintenance. The investment general partner intends to continue to monitor occupancy and expenses at the site, and plans continue to work with the new operating general partner until operations stabilize. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2016.

In June 2010, the investment general partner of Series 20 and Series 41 transferred their respective interests in Cascade Commons LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $22,279,256 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $782,140 and $390,483 for Series 20 and Series 41, respectively. Of the total proceeds received, $18,709 and $9,757 for Series 20 and Series 41, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $763,431 and $380,726 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 20 and Series 41, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $763,431 and $380,726 for Series 20 and Series 41, respectively, as of June 30, 2010.

(Series 42). As of March 31, 2012 and 2011 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 22 properties at March 31, 2012, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 the series, in total, generated $(994,217) and $(843,276), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.92 for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2012 and 2011 Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 42 was $1,676,228 and $3,740,801, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 the net income (loss) of the series was $(2,368,983) and $(2,337,443), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee and impairment losses.

Wingfield Apartments Partnership II LP (Wingfield Apartments II) is a 42-unit multifamily development located in Kinder, Louisiana. In 2009, occupancy averaged 70% and the property operated below breakeven. Occupancy declined further in 2010, averaging 65%, with operations remaining below breakeven. Occupancy improved to 79% as of year-end 2010. In 2011, occupancy averaged 91% but ended the year at 74%. While the local economy has been a factor contributing to the occupancy issues, manager turnover has also been a recurring issue at the property in past years. The investment general partner ordered a secret shopping report in June 2010 in which the manager received a very poor score. According to the report, the manager was rude and exhibited no closing ability. According to the operating general partner, this manager was removed in August 2010. They replaced this manager with one of their experienced managers from another property who has a proven track record for leasing up rural properties located in economically challenged locations. The investment general partner conducted a site visit in October of 2011 to assess the physical condition of the property as well as the effectiveness of the new manager. With the exception of some cracking to asphalt drives and walks, the property was in very good physical condition. It was also concluded that the new manager was professional and effective in her role. As of March 31, 2012, occupancy was 81%. The investment general partner intends to continue to monitor occupancy and expenses at the property. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2016. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.

Dorchester Court Apartments (Dorchester Court Limited Dividend Housing Association, LP) is a 131-unit apartment complex located in Port Huron, MI, with 75% of the units devoted to elderly housing. Due to construction delays and slow initial lease-up, the property experienced difficulty generating positive cash flow from the onset. Further, one of the two original members of the operating general partner entity was unable to contribute his share of the advances required under the operating deficit guarantee. In July 2005, that member was replaced and a new member was inserted as the second member of the operating general partner entity. Although the new second member did not assume the obligations of the guarantor, it had significant resources and contributed over $190,000 to the Operating Partnership to fund the property’s operating deficits during the 2006-2007 periods. In 2008, however, growing tensions between the two members resulted in less attention to management of the property and diminished willingness of the operating general partner to fund deficits. In May 2009, the Operating Partnership approved the transfer of interests within the operating general partner entity; the new second member transferred its interest to the remaining single member. As noted above, the members had been at odds and the transfer was deemed likely to clarify control of the entity and result in improved performance of the property. In addition, the management company was replaced in May 2009 with a management company affiliated with the remaining single member of the operating general partner.

Occupancy averaged only 88% for 2011, but improved to 91% for the first quarter of 2012. Operations were below breakeven in 2011; however, as of March 31, 2012 the property is now operating at breakeven. Management is marketing heavily throughout the area to improve occupancy. A fire occurred on December 25, 2010 that resulted in fire and water damage to one unit and water damage to two other units and some hallways. No residents were injured in the fire. Rehabilitation of these units was completed in the fourth quarter of 2011. The damages were covered under the Operating Partnership’s property insurance. The Operating Partnership has been funding the replacement reserve in accordance with the loan and Operating Partnership agreements. The mortgage, taxes and insurance payments are all current as of March 31, 2012. Accounts payable and accrued expenses stood at approximately $67,000 as of the end of the first quarter 2012, which equates to about one and one half months of operating expenses. The investment general partner intends to continue to monitor improvements in operations and management’s efforts to reduce payables.

Jeremy Associates, LP (Coopers Crossing Apartments) is a 93-unit family development located in Las Colinas, Texas. Despite years of maintaining very strong occupancy, the property consistently operates below breakeven due to high expenses. Occupancy averaged 99% in the first quarter of 2012. Expenses are high mainly due to high maintenance costs as a result of physical deficiencies in a number of buildings on site. Since construction, a number of the buildings have had differential settlement issues resulting in cracked floor slabs, cracked brick veneer, cracking windows and doors and sagging balconies. These concerns have been addressed on an ongoing basis via advances by the operating general partner. Cost control efforts include staffing reduction, reduced marketing and the shutting down of one boiler during warmer months. The operating general partner continues to fund operating deficits despite the expiration of the operating deficit guarantee. So far the operating general partner has advanced over $2,100,000 for repairs and operating deficits in addition to deferring its affiliated company’s property management fee. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes and insurance are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2010. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.

(Series 43) As of March 31, 2012 and 2011 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 23 properties as of March 31, 2012, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 the series, in total, generated $(746,314) and $(1,212,245), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, also provided $0.93 for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 43 was $4,021,942 and $6,613,148, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.


For the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the net income (loss) of the series was $(3,114,804) and $(3,989,777), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, impairment loss, and amortization of acquisition costs.

Dorchester Court Apartments (Dorchester Court Limited Dividend Housing Association, LP) is a 131-unit apartment complex located in Port Huron, MI, with 75% of the units devoted to elderly housing. Due to construction delays and slow initial lease-up, the property experienced difficulty generating positive cash flow from the onset. Further, one of the two original members of the operating general partner entity was unable to contribute his share of the advances required under the operating deficit guarantee. In July 2005, that member was replaced and a new member was inserted as the second member of the operating general partner entity. Although the new second member did not assume the obligations of the guarantor, it had significant resources and contributed over $190,000 to the Operating Partnership to fund the property’s operating deficits during the 2006-2007 periods. In 2008, however, growing tensions between the two members resulted in less attention to management of the property and diminished willingness of the operating general partner to fund deficits. In May 2009, the Operating Partnership approved the transfer of interests within the operating general partner entity; the new second member transferred its interest to the remaining single member. As noted above, the members had been at odds and the transfer was deemed likely to clarify control of the entity and result in improved performance of the property. In addition, the management company was replaced in May 2009 with a management company affiliated with the remaining single member of the operating general partner.

Occupancy averaged only 88% for 2011, but improved to 91% for the first quarter of 2012. Operations were below breakeven in 2011; however, as of March 31, 2012 the property is now operating at breakeven. Management is marketing heavily throughout the area to improve occupancy. A fire occurred on December 25, 2010 that resulted in fire and water damage to one unit and water damage to two other units and some hallways. No residents were injured in the fire. Rehabilitation of these units was completed in the fourth quarter of 2011. The damages were covered under the Operating Partnership’s property insurance. The Operating Partnership has been funding the replacement reserve in accordance with the loan and Operating Partnership agreements. The mortgage, taxes and insurance payments are all current as of March 31, 2012. Accounts payable and accrued expenses stood at approximately $67,000 as of the end of the first quarter 2012, which equates to about one and one half months of operating expenses. The investment general partner intends to continue to monitor improvements in operations and management’s efforts to reduce payables.

Lakewood Apartments-Saranac, LP (Lakewood Apartments) is a 24-unit property located in Saranac, MI. The area suffers from high unemployment, lack of public transportation, and limited shopping. In addition, the property only has seven subsidized units while other area properties are 100% subsidized. As a result, the property has struggled to maintain consistent occupancy and has operated below breakeven every year since construction completion. In 2011 the property continued to operate below breakeven. Though occupancy averaged 92% in 2011, management was forced to offer significant concessions, which resulted in the negative cash flow. In the first quarter 2012, the property operated with 90% average occupancy and operations were slightly above breakeven. However, the property still has high levels of accounts payable caused by unpaid management fees. These management fees are owed to both the previous and current management companies. However, the property has been able to keep all other vendors current since early 2011, while paying a full management fee each month. The outstanding management fees will be paid as cash flow becomes available. All taxes and insurance are current. The replacement reserve account is fully funded. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2010.

Riverview Apartments – Blissfield L.D.H.A., LP (Riverview Apartments) is a 32-unit property in Blissfield, MI. The property has suffered from inconsistent occupancy in recent years due to its isolated location and the decline of the Michigan economy. The property continued to struggle in 2010 and ended the year 83% occupied. The property operated below breakeven for the year as a result of the low occupancy. Because of the poor operating results, a USDA Rural Development Workout Agreement was put in place in 2010 which waived the annual replacement reserve deposit until December 31, 2012. In 2011, management continued to focus on marketing the vacant units through community outreach. Occupancy averaged 90% for the year and operating results were close to breakeven. In the first quarter 2012 average occupancy improved to 92% and the property operated slightly above breakeven. Management has continued offering a one month concession as a means of attracting more residents to the property. Marketing focused on internet sources such as Craigslist and Rent Linx Plus as well as advertising in the local newspaper. The property’s tax and insurance escrow is fully funded. All real estate taxes, mortgage, and insurance payments are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2017.

Carpenter School I Elderly Apartments, LP (Carpenter School I Elderly Apartments) is a 38-unit property located in Natchez, MS. Average physical occupancy was 97% in 2011; however, the property was unable to operate at breakeven due to low rental rates. In first quarter 2012, average physical occupancy continued to be strong at 97%. Despite the strong physical occupancy, low rental rates resulted in the property operating below breakeven. The management company continues to market the available units by working closely with the housing authority and by running various marketing efforts to attract qualified residents. Marketing consists of advertisements in the local newspaper and distributing fliers to local business, churches, and schools. Management has also contacted the local housing authority and has instituted a resident referral program. To help retain residents, management is organizing on-site events to enhance the sense of community at the property. The investment general partner is working with management to develop more regular social programs and activities at the property. The investment general partner intends to continue to work with the operating general partner in an effort to stabilize operations above breakeven. The mortgage, real estate taxes, insurance, and account payables are all current.

Parkside Plaza, L.P. (Parkside Plaza Apartments) is a 35-unit co-op property in Harlem, New York. The property operated below breakeven in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 due to high utility, maintenance and administrative expenses combined with collection loss. Operations improved to above breakeven status in 2009. Occupancy was 100% as of March 31, 2012. Due to high bad debt and operating expenses, the property operated slightly below breakeven in 2010. Excessive receivable and accounts payable continued to hinder operations as the property operated significantly below breakeven in 2011. The deficit was funded by drawing down $46,000 of operating reserves in addition to accruing another $45,000 of payables. In their first full calendar year of managing operations, management was proactive in evicting delinquent tenants and raising the rents for new tenants, closer to the tax credit maximum. The investment general partner met with management in January 2012 to review the 2012 operating budget and initiatives. Management did implement rent increases of an average of 3% in January 2012. The investment general partner will be meeting with management during the second quarter of 2012 to discuss the timely payment of vendor invoices. This outstanding payables balance decreased from $78,000 at year end 2011 to $58,000 at the end of the first quarter 2012. The operating general partner has formally addressed all maintenance issues that were raised during the investment general partner’s 2011 site visit. The mortgage and insurance are current through the first quarter and the property is tax exempt. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2015.

Alexander Mills, Limited Partnership (Alexander Mills Apartments) is a 224-unit family property located approximately 30 miles northeast of Atlanta, in Lawrenceville, GA. Occupancy, which averaged 94% during 2008, began to decline in the fourth quarter of 2008, reaching 89% occupancy in December 2008. Occupancy was relatively stable during 2009 and the first half of 2010 at 90%, but this could only be achieved with rent concessions. During the third and fourth quarters of 2010 occupancy regressed to levels not seen since July 2009 and only averaged 85% and 83%, respectively, and ended 2010 at 83% occupancy due to move-outs, evictions and fewer new leases. The major employers in the area cut either staffing levels or worker’s hours and this situation had not started to improve as of December 31, 2010. Since most residents of Alexander Mills are hourly employees, those who have retained their jobs have had their income significantly reduced. Also, the significant decline in the construction industry in the Atlanta Metro area led to additional vacancies at the site. Management has been very proactive in managing expenses, collecting tenant receivables, and developing rent payment workout plans to retain residents where possible. In spite of these efforts, the management company reported a material increase in bad debt expense in the second quarter of 2010. Bad debt expense did decline in the third and fourth quarters of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2010; however, it was still significantly above what would be considered normal for a multi-family apartment community. The investment general partner performed a site visit in March 2011 and revisited the property in January 2012. The property was found to be in excellent condition. The investment general partner intends to continue to monitor operations to achieve stabilization.

The September 2009 mortgage payment was late and the operating general partner indicated it was unwilling to continue to advance funds to subsidize the Operating Partnership’s below breakeven operations. In addition, the operating general partner hoped that its decision to stop mortgage payments would trigger negotiations with the first mortgage lender on a possible loan restructure or forbearance agreement. This tactic resulted in a forbearance agreement that closed on April 13, 2010, and converted the loan to an interest only payment schedule through December 31, 2011, at which time the contractual mortgage amortization restarted. At closing on the forbearance agreement, the past due interest was paid and a $200,000 operating deficit reserve was established. At the time the forbearance agreement closed in April 2010, the investment general partner expected that property operations would be able to pay the interest only debt service payments through year end 2011 without needing to access monies in the newly established operating deficit reserve. That did not turn out to be the case as operations at Alexander Mills deteriorated over the second half of 2010 due to general weakness in the Lawrenceville, GA sub-market as evidenced by low physical and economic occupancy at the property and resulting incremental costs for bad debt, evictions and unit turn expenses. As of December 31, 2011, the balance in the operating deficit reserve was fully depleted. In the first quarter 2011 there were signs that the local economy was improving as occupancy increased to 90% from 83% in the fourth quarter 2010 and negative cash flow declined to ($29,000) for the first quarter 2011. This improvement in market conditions continued in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2011 as physical occupancy improved to average 95%, 94% and 96%, respectively. For the last two months of the second quarter of 2011 and all of the third and fourth quarters of 2011, the property operated at a breakeven level. While the rental market in Cobb County started to improve in the first half of 2011, continued to improve in the second half of 2011 and thru the first quarter of 2012, operations at Alexander Mills were not strong enough at the start of 2012 to pay debt service including amortization which re-started with the February 1, 2012 mortgage payment. The operating general partner is forecasting a cash flow deficit of $150,000 to $180,000 in 2012. As calendar year 2012 began, the operating general partner and the investment general partner agreed to start the year funding deficits on a month by month basis by reducing the property management fee to 3% (from 5%) and making advances from fund reserves while monitoring the local apartment market. Through March 31, 2012, $36,685 from fund reserves of the investment general partners of Alexander Mills, L.P., had been advanced to the Operating Partnership to keep the mortgage current. If the market strengthening does not continue, or the investment general partner determines that fund reserves are no longer available to finance monthly deficits at Alexander Mills, then the Operating Partnership faces a high probability of foreclosure and potential recapture costs in 2012. If recapture were to occur in 2012, the Operating Partnership would lose future tax credits of $324,495, and incur recapture and interest penalty costs of $888,890, equivalent to approximately $89 and $244 per 1,000 BACs respectively.

Due to the aforementioned risks, the operating general partner contacted the loan servicer in May 2011 to initiate conversations about extending the expiration date of the existing forbearance period or amending the mortgage loan terms in some other fashion. In June 2011, the loan was transferred to the special servicer to address the operating general partner’s request. The investment general partner and the operating general partner negotiated with the special servicer throughout the fourth quarter of 2011; however, these negotiations were unsuccessful. The initial response from the special servicer in August 2011 was that it would not extend the forbearance period, nor amend any other loan terms unless the Operating Partnership paid down the loan by 13% - 17% (i.e. $1.5M - $2.0M) of the outstanding principal. The investment general partner and the operating general partner continued to negotiate with the special servicer during the fourth quarter of 2011; however, the special servicer offered no compromise from the pay down. The mortgage payment, real estate taxes and insurance payments were current as of March 31, 2012.

(Series 44) As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 10 properties at March 31, 2012, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.


For the tax years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 the series, in total, generated $(819,364) and $(1,645,360), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.97 and $0.96, respectively, in tax credits per BAC to the investors.

As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 44 was $2,365,868 and $5,205,103, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the net income (loss) of the series was $(3,379,213) and $(3,202,227), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, impairment losses and amortization of acquisition costs.

Post Oak East Apartments (Post Oak East L.P.) is a 240-unit family property located in Euless, Texas. Occupancy began to decline in the fourth quarter of 2009, reaching 85% in December 2009. A new management company, hired in December 2009, implemented a comprehensive marketing and resident retention program in an effort to increase occupancy and find more qualified residents. As a result, occupancy improved to and remained at an average of 92% in 2010 and 2011.

Prior to the construction loan converting to conventional permanent fixed-rate financing in November 2010, the property was operating above breakeven. However, the debt payments under the construction loan (floating rate, tax-exempt bonds) consisted of only interest payments with no principal amortization payments. Had the loan converted to permanent financing under the floating rate for tax-exempt bonds, as originally planned, and the property maintained the then current levels of bad debt expense, unit turnover costs, and real estate taxes, operations would have been below breakeven.

In November 2010, simultaneously with the conversion to conventional permanent financing, and with the approval of the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs and the investment general partner, the Operating Partnership admitted a new non-profit operating general partner that assumed 51% of the original operating general partner interest. The remaining 49% of the original operating general partner interest was converted to a Class B limited partner interest, owned by the original operating general partner. Because of its non-profit status, the new operating general partner entitles the property to a full abatement of the real estate taxes, saving the property approximately $150,000 annually. Under the terms of the permanent loan (principal of $13,600,000 and a fixed interest rate of 5.50%) and a full abatement of the real estate taxes, the property is operating above breakeven.

In an effort to facilitate the closing of the permanent financing in November 2010, the investment general partner approved the release of the remaining equity prior to the Operating Partnership meeting rental achievement. In October of 2011, the Operating Partnership was able to document rental achievement. The property’s mortgage and insurance payments are current as of March 31, 2012.

Brookside Park Limited Partnership (Brookside Park Apartments) is a 200-unit family property in Atlanta, Georgia. Occupancy fell to a low of 89% in March 2007, as a result of crime in the surrounding neighborhood. Management responded by replacing chain link fencing with more durable hard fence, thinning shrub cover and installing alarm systems in every unit. Due to an operating general partnership transfer in June of 2008, the new operating general partner agreed to extend the operating deficit guarantee through June of 2011. The operating general partner continued to fund all deficits through the end of 2011 even as theirthough its operating deficit guarantee expired. The operating deficits in 2009, 2010 and 2011 were ($76,000), ($132,000) and ($123,000), respectively. In early January of 2012, the operating general partner informed the investment general partner that its willingness to continue to fund operating deficits for the remainder of the compliance period would be limited. Both parties are discussingdiscussed scenarios to assessevaluate additional funding sources for 2012 and beyond. Note thatAlthough no agreement was reached between the operating general partner did continueand the investment general partner during 2012, the operating general partner continued to fund $242,489 of deficits through the AprilDecember 1, 2012 mortgage payment; however, the deficit funding stopped for the January 1, 2013 mortgage payment. As a result, the mortgage bonds are currently in default. The operating general partner intends to either transfer its general partner interest to the investment general partner or transfer the property to the lender in a deed in lieu of a foreclosure transaction if the investment general partner elects not to become the operating general partner due to the forecast of unending operating deficits that would need to be funded through the end of the tax credit compliance period on December 31, 2019, or the unwillingness of the servicing agent for the mortgage bonds, to meaningfully restructure the payment terms on the mortgage bonds. During the first quarter of 2013 and the first month of the second quarter of 2013, the investment general partner has been in negotiations with the servicing agent and the syndicator of the state tax credits for Brookside Park Limited Partnership, in an attempt to re-structure the mortgage bonds and avoid foreclosure and possible recapture. In late March 2013, the servicing agent indicated a willingness to redeem and then re-issue the mortgage bonds with more favorable payment terms. The servicing agent estimated the cost of this reissuance at $400,000 - $500,000. These are costs that would have to be paid by the Operating Partnership and shared by the state and federal tax credit investors. The investment general partner is investigating selling some or all of the remaining federal tax credits to source the federal tax credit investors’ share of the new capital needed in order to: a) cure the existing mortgage bond default, b) facilitate the redemption and re-issuance of the mortgage bonds, and c) avoid foreclosure and the accompanying recapture costs. This means that all or a portion of the existing investment limited partner’s interest in Brookside Park Limited Partnership may need to be sold in order raise capital to avoid foreclosure and recapture.

 

Occupancy improved in 2010 averaging 94% and remained strong during 2011 and 2012 averaging 94%. Occupancy remained strong averaging 95% in 2011 and during the first quarter of 2012.2013 declined nominally to 93%. Currently, management offers a move-in special on the two-bedroom terrace level apartments where prospective tenants will pay a reduced rent of $699 for the first six months, and the regular rate of $745 for the remainder of the year lease. Management continues to market the property by distributing fliers to local and city businesses, using on-line advertising sites, and leaving property information at the local housing authority for recent voucher recipients. Recently, the property partnered with Community Connections, a social service organization. During the fourth quarter of 2009, management implemented a surety bond as an incentive for new residents. The residents will pay a minimal amount for a surety bond as opposed to a higher amount for a security deposit. The property will receive a guarantee that the surety bond, limited to the bond cap amount, will cover all damage incurred to a unit.

Management hired a new leasing consultant in May 2011 to aid in further improving occupancy. The operating general partner hired a new regional director of operations in the fourth quarter of 2011 to oversee its Georgia portfolio. Though occupancy remains strong, the property continued to operate below breakeven throughin 2011, 2012 and the endfirst quarter of 2011.2013. This dropdecline in cash flow is attributable to high tenant receivables, bad debt expense, higher than budgeted vacancy losses, rental concessions, and high utility costs.

In June 2012 the operating general partner decided to change the property management company responsible for managing its apartment portfolio in the Southeastern United States including Brookside Park. The effective date of the management change was August 15, 2012. The investment general partner had previously indicated that it intended to monitor this change to determine whether the new management company would be able to deliver better operating results for Brookside Park. This was after the Operating Partnership reported negative cash flow in each year from 2008 - 2012. After funding these deficits since 2008, the operating general partner notified the investment general partner in December 2012 that it had been unsuccessful in its attempt to negotiate a loan modification with the servicer of the mortgage bonds that finance Brookside Park Apartments and that it would no longer fund deficits. As a result, there was a payment default in January 2013 and the servicer sent the Operating Partnership a default notice on January 14, 2013. The cure period for the subject default ended on February 1, 2013 without the default being cured. If the investment general partner is unable to negotiate a loan modification or forbearance agreement with the servicer for the mortgage bonds, there is a high probability that the mortgage will be foreclosed in 2013. The property’s mortgage, real estate tax and insurance payments arewere current as of March 31, 2012.2013. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2019. If recapture were to occur in 2012,2013, the Operating Partnership would lose future tax credits of $63,284,$1,218,393, and incur recapture and interest penalty costs of $44,511,$1,391,602, equivalent to approximately $23$303 and $16$347 per 1,000 BACs respectively.

Alexander Mills, Limited Partnership (Alexander Mills Apartments) is a 224-unit family property located approximately 30 miles northeast of Atlanta, in Lawrenceville, GA. Occupancy, which averaged 94% during 2008, began to decline in the fourth quarter of 2008, reaching 89% occupancy in December 2008. Occupancy was relatively stable during 2009 and the first half of 2010 at 90%, but this could only be achieved with rent concessions. During the third and fourth quarters of 2010 occupancy regressed to levels not seen since July 2009 and only averaged 85% and 83%, respectively, and ended 2010 at 83% occupancy due to move-outs, evictions and fewer new leases. The major employers in the area cut either staffing levels or worker’s hours and this situation had not started to improve as of December 31, 2010. Since most residents of Alexander Mills are hourly employees, those who have retained their jobs have had their income significantly reduced. Also, the significant decline in the construction industry in the Atlanta Metro area led to additional vacancies at the site. Management has been very proactive in managing expenses, collecting tenant receivables, and developing rent payment workout plans to retain residents where possible. In spite of these efforts, the management company reported a material increase in bad debt expense in the second quarter of 2010. Bad debt expense did decline in the third and fourth quarters of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2010; however, it was still significantly above what would be considered normal for a multi-family apartment community. The investment general partner performed a site visit in March 2011 and revisited the property in January 2012. The property was found to be in excellent condition. The investment general partner intends to continue to monitor operations to achieve stabilization.

The September 2009 mortgage payment was late and the operating general partner indicated it was unwilling to continue to advance funds to subsidize the Operating Partnership’s below breakeven operations. In addition, the operating general partner hoped that its decision to stop mortgage payments would trigger negotiations with the first mortgage lender on a possible loan restructure or forbearance agreement. This tactic resulted in a forbearance agreement that closed on April 13, 2010, and converted the loan to an interest only payment schedule through December 31, 2011, at which time the contractual mortgage amortization restarted. At closing on the forbearance agreement, the past due interest was paid and a $200,000 operating deficit reserve was established. At the time the forbearance agreement closed in April 2010, the investment general partner expected that property operations would be able to pay the interest only debt service payments through year end 2011 without needing to access monies in the newly established operating deficit reserve. That did not turn out to be the case as operations at Alexander Mills deteriorated over the second half of 2010 due to general weakness in the Lawrenceville, GA sub-market as evidenced by low physical and economic occupancy at the property and resulting incremental costs for bad debt, evictions and unit turn expenses. As of December 31, 2011, the balance in the operating deficit reserve was fully depleted. In the first quarter 2011 there were signs that the local economy was improving as occupancy increased to 90% from 83% in the fourth quarter 2010 and negative cash flow declined to ($29,000) for the first quarter 2011. This improvement in market conditions continued in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2011 as physical occupancy improved to average 95%, 94% and 96%, respectively. For the last two months of the second quarter of 2011 and all of the third and fourth quarters of 2011, the property operated at a breakeven level. While the rental market in Cobb County started to improve in the first half of 2011, continued to improve in the second half of 2011 and thru the first quarter of 2012, operations at Alexander Mills were not strong enough at the start of 2012 to pay debt service including amortization which re-started with the February 1, 2012 mortgage payment. The operating general partner is forecasting a cash flow deficit of $150,000 to $180,000 in 2012. As calendar year 2012 began, the operating general partner and the investment general partner agreed to start the year funding deficits on a month by month basis by reducing the property management fee to 3% (from 5%) and making advances from fund reserves while monitoring the local apartment market. Through March 31, 2012, $36,685 from fund reserves of the investment general partners of Alexander Mills, L.P., had been advanced to the Operating Partnership to keep the mortgage current. If the market strengthening does not continue, or the investment general partner determines that fund reserves are no longer available to finance monthly deficits at Alexander Mills, then the Operating Partnership faces a high probability of foreclosure and potential recapture costs in 2012. If recapture were to occur in 2012,2014, the Operating Partnership would lose future tax credits of $397,410,$742,111, and incur recapture and interest penalty costs of $1,086,449$1,597,559, equivalent to approximately $147$185 and $402 per 1,000 BACs respectively.

Due to the aforementioned risks, the operating general partner contacted the loan servicer in May 2011 to initiate conversations about extending the expiration date of the existing forbearance period or amending the mortgage loan terms in some other fashion. In June 2011, the loan was transferred to the special servicer to address the operating general partner’s request. The investment general partner and the operating general partner negotiated with the special servicer throughout the fourth quarter of 2011; however, these negotiations were unsuccessful. The initial response from the special servicer in August 2011 was that it would not extend the forbearance period, nor amend any other loan terms unless the Operating Partnership paid down the loan by 13% - 17% (i.e. $1.5M - $2.0M) of the outstanding principal. The investment general partner and the operating general partner continued to negotiate with the special servicer during the fourth quarter of 2011; however, the special servicer offered no compromise from the pay down. The mortgage payment, real estate taxes and insurance payments were current as of March 31, 2012.

United Development CO. 2001 LP (Memphis 102) is a 102-unit single family home scattered site development, located in Memphis, TN. Due to a downturn in the local economy and rising unemployment, average occupancy has suffered at Memphis 102 since 2007. In 2011, average occupancy fell significantly to 76% at Memphis 102 due to the continuing downward rental market and the lack of job opportunities in Memphis, as well as the unavailability of Section 8 vouchers from the Memphis Housing Authority due to the operating general partner not being current on the real estate taxes owed by Memphis 102. In late 2011, the Housing Authority once again started to refer Section 8 voucher holders to Memphis 102. For the quarter ending March 31, 2012, occupancy continued to fall averaging 62%. Management has recently begun radio and other advertising marketing efforts as well as offering rental concessions; however, occupancy remains a significant challenge in 2012. For the quarter ending March 31, 2012 and in 2011, net cash flow expended by property operations totaled approximately ($55,000) and ($269,262), respectively, due to high real estate taxes, maintenance expenses and bad debt. Negative operations were funded primarily by the accrual of real estate taxes and accompanying interest and other penalties levied by the City and Shelby County, as well as by advances from the operating general partner and its affiliates. In 2010, occupancy was relatively stable at 88%, but the property operated below breakeven due to high real estate taxes, and maintenance and bad debt expenses. In 2010, net cash flow expended by property operations totaled ($17,842), which was funded with operating general partner deficit advances.

During a site visit to the property in August 2011, the investment general partner noted that the management company, an affiliate of the operating general partner, lacked certain internal controls, communication, and structure to provide accurate and timely reporting. It was also noted that the weak economy and lack of job opportunities in the Memphis area have continued to negatively impact occupancy. Furthermore, the operating general partner indicated that it was negotiating with city and county officials on a repayment plan for outstanding real estate taxes which have been accruing for most of Memphis 102 individual tax parcels since 2006. The estimated accrued real estate tax liability for Memphis 102 totals approximately $602,000 as of March 31, 2012.

On September 2, 2011, the lender filed a complaint with the Chancery Court of Shelby County, TN requesting the appointment of a receiver for Memphis 102 and four other unrelated LIHTC partnerships of the operating general partner primarily due to significant unpaid real estate taxes and incomplete reporting. A hearing was originally scheduled for September 21, 2011. The attorney representing the estate of one of the operating general partners negotiated with the lender and obtained several continuances of the hearing extending the date of the hearing until July 2012. As conditions of the continuances, the lender is requiring that Memphis 102 and the four other unrelated LIHTC partnerships meet certain conditions, including: 1) providing complete information on the status of past due real estate taxes for all properties, 2) obtaining written agreements with the County and City to stay all tax sales, 3) executing and complying with repayment plans for the real estate tax liabilities with both the City and Shelby County, and 4) installing new operating and financial management controls at the management company in order to provide reporting satisfactory to the lender. Memphis 102 and the operating general partner are in the process of completing these conditions and are continuing to negotiate with the lender. The mortgage and insurance payments are current as of March 31, 2012, although the significant unpaid real estate taxes are an undeclared default on the mortgage.

The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2018. If the property is foreclosed in 2012, the estimated credit loss of $1,013,286 and tax credit recapture cost and interest penalty of $1,650,752 is equivalent to credit loss of $375 and tax credit recapture and interest of $611 per 1,000 BACs.

United Development Limited Partnership 2001 (Families First II) is a 66-unit single family development, located in West Memphis, AR. Occupancy averaged 85% in 2011 and declined to 73% in the first quarter 2012 due to continued weakness in the local economy. The property has seen an increase in bad debt resulting from job loss and reduction in take-home pay among current residents. However, despite these issues, the property was able to generate a small positive cash flow in 2011. In the first quarter of 2012, the property has operated below breakeven. In addition to low occupancy, the property is struggling with a high level of accounts payable. Management is focused on paying outstanding bills but the limited cash flow has made it difficult to do so. The mortgage payments, real estate taxes and insurance are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2018.

North Forty Aspen Plus, L.P. (Aspen Village Townhomes), is a 30-unit apartment complex located approximately 45 miles southwest of Washington D.C. in Bealeton, Virginia.  The units are all three-bedrooms and they are located in fifteen duplex townhomes.  The property experienced a decline in occupancy in 2011, caused primarily by weakness in the local economy.  In 2012, occupancy has rebounded and remained strong at 97% as of March 2012, largely due to increased marketing and a strengthening economy.  The property operated above breakeven through March because of the increased occupancy. In addition, the property was inspected in December 2011, and was found in excellent condition.  The operating general partner expects to make minor parking lot repairs in 2012, which will be funded from the replacement reserve account.  All real estate tax, insurance and mortgage payments are current.

(Series 45) As of March 31, 2012 and 2011 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 30 properties as of March 31, 2012, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

For the tax years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 the series, in total, generated $(1,653,370) and $(1,900,372), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.95 for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.


As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 45 was $8,228,807 and $12,086,770, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.


For the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the net income (loss) of the series was $(5,737,784) and $(4,306,886), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee, impairment losses and amortization of acquisition costs.

Baldwin Villas Limited Partnership (Baldwin Villas) is a 65-unit property located in Pontiac, MI. The project consists of three and four-bedroom single family rental homes, with a home ownership option available to qualifying tenants. Because the cost to build the project approximated the cost for a single-family development, construction of the project required a significant amount of debt. As a result, the rent structure required to support the project is high, and most tenants need significant subsidies to afford the $1,000+/per month rents. The property has experienced a significant decline in operations and cash flow since 2006. As of March 31, 2012, Baldwin Villas had significant unpaid debt service obligations, accrued real estate taxes, and operating payables. It also had a list of deferred maintenance items that could not be addressed due to the property’s weak operating cash flow.

Since 2008, Baldwin Villas has had numerous monetary and technical defaults on its first mortgage debt. The Operating Partnership obtained the initial funding for this project from variable rate bonds issued by the state housing authority. These bonds were secured by an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a local bank. The letter of credit fee, which had been accruing at approximately $33,000 per quarter, totaled approximately $213,000 on August 30, 2011 when the letter of credit was drawn on and the bonds were paid in full. This event converted the original bond financing for the operating partnership to a traditional commercial mortgage loan.

On August 30, 2011, Baldwin Villas entered into a Settlement Agreement with the lender resulting in a new mortgage note being issued which is guaranteed by the operating general partner and its principals. Under the terms of the new mortgage note, the principal balance outstanding for the loan was confirmed at $4,809,749. In addition, there is a deferred amount owed to the bank for unpaid letter of credit fees and other bank costs (e.g. legal costs) of $459,856. The interest rate on the new mortgage note was set at 2% over prime. The note has a maturity date of June 30, 2013, and monthly installments of $35,000 that commenced on October 22, 2011. According to the Settlement Agreement, Baldwin Villas was required to make $30,000 installment payments in August and September 2011 to pay down the principal balance of the new mortgage note, as well as pay the 2009, 2010 and 2011 outstanding real estate taxes based on an agreed upon payment schedule. In addition, one of the principals of the operating general partner is required to pay the lender an additional $400,000 toward the mortgage debt with two, $200,000 installment payments due on April 30, 2012 and November 30, 2012, respectively, from distributions or income from certain unrelated entities owned by that principal. Furthermore, as part of the Settlement Agreement, Baldwin Villas provided the lender with “consent and confession judgments” through the Circuit Court of Oakland County, MI, which, in the event of a default under the Settlement Agreement, would allow the lender to appoint a receiver who would have the authority to sell the property. The Settlement Agreement was executed without the knowledge or consent of the investment general partner.

The operating general partner has an unlimited operating deficit guaranty to provide operating deficit advances to the Operating Partnership. In February 2012, the operating general partner provided $109,055 to pay 2009 outstanding real estate taxes, interest and penalties. In 2011, the operating general partner provided $146,382 of operating deficit advances to Baldwin Villas to satisfy the required payment obligations of the new mortgage note and settlement agreement. From inception through March 31, 2012, the operating general partner has provided operating deficit advances to Baldwin Villas totaling $357,283. As of June 27, 2012 the required monthly installment payments of the new mortgage note and settlement agreement have been made; however, the 2010 and 2011 real estate taxes, totaling approximately $97,800 and $89,300, respectively have not been paid. Also, the operating general partner indicated that the April 20, 2012 installment payment of $200,000 due from certain unrelated entities owned by a principal of the operating general partner has been paid.  No default notice has been received by the partnership from the lender as of June 27, 2012.

For the quarter ending March 31, 2012, average occupancy had further eroded to 67%. Average occupancy decreased to 80% for 2011 compared to 89% for 2010. The increased vacancy at the property is due to the continued poor local economy and limited job opportunities in the Pontiac area, as well as the lack of available funds to complete costly tenant turnovers, as further discussed below. In recent years Section 8 vouchers have again become available and as of March 31, 2012 approximately 40% of the property’s tenant base consists of Section 8 voucher holders. Since 2009, management has tried to improve occupancy through working with the local housing authority to obtain voucher holder referrals, held several open houses, and increased online and newspaper advertisements. A new full time property manager was hired in January 2012.

The property has operated significantly below breakeven for the past few years. Operating expenses remain well above state averages due to the fact that the property consists of three and four-bedroom single-family homes. In previous years, maintenance expenses were very high due to extremely costly unit turnover expenses for these single-family homes. However, for the quarter ending March 31, 2012 and in 2011, maintenance expenses decreased due to poor occupancy and less cash flow available to address the property’s maintenance needs. Although there are qualified tenants available, vacancies continue to remain high due to the lack of available funds to complete the costly tenant turnovers. Utility expenses increased in the quarter ending March 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 due to the charges to maintain basic heating and lighting for increasing unoccupied homes.

In January 2011, Baldwin Villas received a tax foreclosure notice from Oakland County regarding past due2008 real estate taxes.  Total taxes, interest and penalties of $105,695 were due on March 31, 2011 or the County had the right to take the property through foreclosure.  On March 16, 2011, the lender made a protective advance for the outstanding amount to prevent the property from being taken through foreclosure. The protective advance was added to the principal balance in the new mortgage note and Settlement Agreement discussed above.

For the quarter ending March 31, 2012, the Operating Partnership expended net cash flow of approximately ($95,000) due to low occupancy and consequently low rental revenue, high debt service payment requirements from the Settlement Agreement, and high real estate taxes. Negative operations were primarily funded by advances from the operating general partner and accrual of real estate taxes. In 2011, the Operating Partnership has expended net cash flows of approximately ($606,688) funded primarily through the increase in mortgage debt from default fees from the Settlement Agreement, operating deficit advances from the operating general partner, as well as accruals of operating payables and real estate taxes. In 2010, the Operating Partnership expended net cash flows of ($306,845) funded primarily through increased accruals in operating payables, interest, letter of credit fees, and real estate taxes.

As noted above, the operating general partner reports that the lender has not yet issued a default notice to the Operating Partnership with regard to the new mortgage note and Settlement Agreement. As of March, 2012, the Operating Partnership remains current on its property insurance obligations. Real estate taxes for 2011 and 2010 totaling approximately $185,000 remain unpaid. The operating general partner indicated that it did file appeals for the 2011 and 2010 real estate taxes, which are currently pending. The investment general partner continues to press the operating general partner to provide operating deficit advances to: 1) pay the mortgage obligations of the Settlement Agreement and real estate tax deficiencies, 2) pay down growing payables, and 3) fund deferred maintenance and tenant turnover expenses which will improve occupancy at the property. If the property is foreclosed in 2012, the estimated tax credit recapture cost and interest penalty of $45,103 is equivalent to recapture and interest of $11 per 1,000 BACs.

Brookside Park Limited Partnership (Brookside Park Apartments) is a 200-unit family property in Atlanta, Georgia. Occupancy fell to a low of 89% in March 2007, as a result of crime in the surrounding neighborhood. Management responded by replacing chain link fencing with more durable hard fence, thinning shrub cover and installing alarm systems in every unit. Due to an operating general partnership transfer in June of 2008, the new operating general partner agreed to extend the operating deficit guarantee through June of 2011. The operating general partner continued to fund all deficits through the end of 2011 even as their operating deficit guarantee expired. In early January of 2012, the operating general partner informed the investment general partner that its willingness to continue to fund operating deficits for the remainder of the compliance period would be limited. Both parties are discussing scenarios to assess additional funding sources for 2012 and beyond. Note that the operating general partner has continued to fund deficits through the April 1, 2012 mortgage payment.

Occupancy improved in 2010 averaging 94%. Occupancy remained strong averaging 95% in 2011 and during the first quarter of 2012. Currently, management offers a move-in special on the two-bedroom terrace level apartments where prospective tenants will pay a reduced rent of $699 for the first six months, and the regular rate of $745 for the remainder of the year lease. Management continues to market the property by distributing fliers to local and city businesses, using on-line advertising sites, and leaving property information at the local housing authority for recent voucher recipients. Recently, the property partnered with Community Connections, a social service organization. During the fourth quarter of 2009, management implemented a surety bond as an incentive for new residents. The residents will pay a minimal amount for a surety bond as opposed to a higher amount for a security deposit. The property will receive a guarantee that the surety bond, limited to the bond cap amount, will cover all damage incurred to a unit. Management hired a new leasing consultant in May 2011 to aid in further improving occupancy. The operating general partner hired a new regional director of operations in the fourth quarter of 2011 to oversee its Georgia portfolio. Though occupancy remains strong, the property continued to operate below breakeven through the end of 2011. This drop in cash flow is attributable to high tenant receivables, bad debt, higher than budgeted vacancy losses, rental concessions, and high utility costs.

The property’s mortgage, real estate tax and insurance payments are current as of March 31, 2012. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2019. If recapture were to occur in 2012, the Operating Partnership would lose future tax credits of $1,694,674, and incur recapture and interest penalty costs of $1,191,984, equivalent to approximately $422 and $297$398 per 1,000 BACs respectively.

 

Lone Terrace, Limited Partnership (Lone Terrace Apartments) is a 31-unit family property in Lone Grove, OK. In 2010, operations fell below breakeven for the year due to a 6% drop in occupancy and an increase in maintenance and insurance costs. The majority of maintenance costs were replacement items that were not reimbursed from the replacement reserve account due to Rural Development restrictions. In addition, Rural Development required the propertymanagement to contract out all maintenance work at a higher cost instead of using affiliated company employees. Insurance costs also increased due to a spike in claims across the Midwest in 2008 and 2009. In 2011, occupancy averagedincreased to an average of 92%. As; however, as a result of a further increaseincreases in maintenance expenses, operations remained below breakeven in 2011. Through the first quarter ofbreakeven. In 2012, the property operated above breakeven due to increased revenue and a utility reimbursement from the Lone Grove Trust Authority. The reimbursement was for an overcharge of utilities for the prior 12 months. Occupancy averaged 89% in 2012. As of March 31, 2013, the property is averaging 86% occupancy94% occupied and is currently operating belowabove breakeven. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as needed. The property’s mortgage, real estate taxes, and insurance payments are all current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2018.

 

Sulphur Terrace, Limited Partnership (Sulphur Terrace Apartments) is a 32-unit family propertyIn November 2012, the investment general partners of Series 26, Series 32 and Series 45 transferred 50% of their respective interests in Sulphur, OK. In 2010, the property generated a cash flow deficit for the year. The primary cause of the deficit was that Rural Development restrictions prohibited the property from reimbursing maintenance costs from the replacement reserve account. Also due200 East Avenue Associates LP to Rural Development restrictions,an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $4,118,291 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $1,772, $1,449 and $5,442 for Series 26, Series 32 and Series 45, respectively. Of the total proceeds received $5,000 was requiredpaid to contract out all maintenance work at a higher cost insteadBCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of using$1,772, $1,449 and $442 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 26, Series 32 and Series 45, respectively. The remaining 50% investment limited partner interests in the affiliated company employees. A spikeOperating Partnership is scheduled to be transferred in insurance claims across the Midwest in 2008 and 2009 also caused insurance costs to double. In 2011, the property recovered and operated well, averaging 95% occupancyDecember 2013 for the yearassumption of approximately $4,118,291 of the remaining outstanding mortgage balance and generating positiveanticipated cash flow. Rural Development approvedproceeds of $8,662. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a rent increase effective January 1, 2011 which helped boost revenues. Throughgain on the first quartertransfer of 2012, the property continued to have strong occupancy at 97%Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and it generated positive cash flow. The operating general partner continues to fund deficitsexpense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $1,772, $1,449 and $442 for Series 26, Series 32 and Series 45, respectively, as needed. The property’s mortgage, real estate taxes, and insurance payments are all current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires onof December 31, 2018.2012.


(Series 46) As of March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 15 properties as of March 31, 2012,2013, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.

 

For the tax years ended December 31, 20112012 and 20102011 the series, in total, generated $(1,287,129)$(1,390,016) and $(1,194,058)$(1,287,129), respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors, and also provided $0.97 for both years in tax credits per BAC to the investors.


As of March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 46 was $8,838,302$5,995,347 and $11,632,800,$8,838,302, respectively. The decrease is a result of the way the Fund accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.

For the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the net income (loss) of the series was $(3,128,561)$(3,165,494) and $(3,098,043)$(3,128,561), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund's share of loss from Operating Partnerships, the fund management fee and impairment loss.

 

Agent Kensington LP (Kensington Heights Apartments) is a 126-unit senior property located in Kansas City, MO.  The property hadhas operated below breakeven operations resulting fromsince 2010 due to high operating expenses, specifically maintenance costs.  During the second quarter of 2010, it was identified that the property was dealing with acosts relating to bed bug issue.  Since that time, the bed bug remediation has become an extensive and on-going problem.bugs.  In 2011, maintenance costs continued to increase as a new contractor was engaged to assist in eradicating the bed bug infestation.  DespiteIn 2012, the ongoing pest issue was more manageable and treatment costs have decreased significantly. Overall operating expenses decreased in 2012, with operations expected to be close to breakeven for the 2011 occupancyyear. Occupancy in 2012 averaged 96%98% and has continued to remain strong through the first quarter of 2012, averaging 95%2013 at 99%. Management is projectingThe operating general partner submitted a $13,000 deficit in 2012.plan to replace the domestic hot water tank and repair the HVAC of which a portion will be funded with an operating partner advance and a portion from the replacement reserve withdrawal. Although the operating deficit guarantee has expired, the operating general partner has been funding deficits.  If necessary, the operating general partner have stated that they are willingcontinues to fund the shortfall.deficits.  All mortgage, taxes and insurance are current.  The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2018.

Rosehill Apartments (Rosehill Place of Topeka, L.L.C.) (Rosehill Apartments) is a 48-unit elderlysenior apartment complex located in Topeka, Kansas.  Despite strong occupancy of 97%averaging 98%, the property operated just below breakeven in 2011.  Thethe first quarter of 2013 due to high operating expenses and insufficient rental rates.  Although the operating managing member hired a real estate tax consulting firm to appeal the 2011 real estatetax assessment, via the payment under protest process, when the first half of the 2011 taxes were paid in December 2011;however, the appealthis was not approvedultimately rejected by the tax authority. The operating managing memberThis ruling could appeal furtherhave been appealed; however, the legal expense to go to court would have been greater than the state tax court; however, it has been determined that theactual cost to do so, would far exceed the anticipated reduction in the taxes.savings. In addition, because occupancy isremained strong, the stateState tax credit-allocating agency approved a $15 per unit per month rent increase which took effect in November 2010 and another2010; unfortunately, this did not bring 2011 operations above breakeven. Despite a second $10 per unit per month rent increase, took effectmade effective May 1, 2012.  These increases in rental income along with a slight reduction in real estate taxes should result in2012, and occupancy ending December 2012 at 98%, the property operating above breakeven.  The property operated slightly aboveremained below breakeven inthrough the first quarter of 2012 at 97% occupancy.  In December 2010, with the approval of the investment general partner, the2013. The operating managing member closed a transaction, which re-set the principal balance outstanding on the first mortgage loan from its then current balance to its original commitment amount.  This provided enough capital to pay the past due real estate taxes, which were approximately two and a half years in arrears.  The operating general partner reports that the monthly mortgage, tax, and insurance escrow payments are current as of March 31, 2012.2013.

  

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

None.

136

Principal Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), which require the Fund to make various estimates and assumptions. The following section is a summary of some aspects of those accounting policies that may require subjective or complex judgments and are most important to the portrayal of the Fund’s financial condition and results of operations. The Fund believes that there is a low probability that the use of different estimates or assumptions in making these judgments would result in materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements.

 

The Fund is required to assess potential impairments to its long-lived assets, which are primarily investments in limited partnerships. The Fund accounts for its investment in limited partnerships in accordance with the equity method of accounting since the Fund does not control the operations of the Operating Partnerships. The purpose of an impairment analysis is to verify that the real estate investment balance reflected on the balance sheet does not exceed the value of the underlying investments.

 

If the book value of the Fund’s investment in an Operating Partnership exceeds the estimated value derived by management, which generally consists of the remaining future Low-Income Housing Credits allocable to the Fund and the estimated residual value to the Fund, the Fund reduces its investment in the Operating Partnership.

 

The main reason an impairment losses typically occurs is that the annual operating losses, recorded in accordance with the equity method of accounting, of the investment in limited partnership does not reduce the balance as quickly as the annual use of the tax credits. In years prior to the year ended March 31, 2009, management included remaining tax credits as well as residual value in the calculated value of the underlying investments. However, management decided to take a more conservative approach to the investment calculation and determined that the majority of the residual value component of the valuation was zero for the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012. However, it is important to note that this change in the accounting estimate to the calculation method of the impairment losses has no effect on the actual value or performance of the overall investment, nor does it have any effect on the remaining credits to be generated.

 

In accordance with the accounting guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities, the Fund determines when it should include the assets, liabilities, and activities of a variable interest entity (VIE) in its financial statements, and when it should disclose information about its relationship with a VIE. The analysis that must be performed to determine which entity should consolidate a VIE focuses on control and economic factors.  A VIE is a legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets, which must be consolidated by a company if it is the primary beneficiary because it has (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. If multiple unrelated parties share such power, as defined, no party will be required to consolidate the VIE. Further, the guidance requires continual reconsideration of the primary beneficiary of a VIE. 

Principal Accounting Policies and Estimates - continued

 

Based on this guidance, the Operating Partnerships in which the Partnership invests meet the definition of a VIE because the owners of the equity at risk in these entities do not have the power to direct their operations.  However, management does not consolidate the Partnership’s interests in these VIEs, as it is not considered to be the primary beneficiary since it does not have the power to direct the activities that are considered most significant to the economic performance of these entities.  The Partnership currently records the amount of its investment in these partnerships as an asset on its balance sheets, recognizes its share of partnership income or losses in the statements of operations, and discloses how it accounts for material types of these investments in its financial statements. The Partnership’s balance in investment in Operating Partnerships, advances made to Operating Partnerships, plus the risk of recapture of tax credits previously recognized on these investments, represents its maximum exposure to loss.  The Partnership’s exposure to loss on these partnerships is mitigated by the condition and financial performance of the underlying Housing Complexes as well as the strength of the general partners and their guarantee against credit recapture to the investors of the Partnership.

 

Recent Accounting Changes

 

In June 2009,May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued an amendmentupdate to the accountingexisting guidance related to fair value measurements on how to measure fair value and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIEs). The amended guidance modifies the consolidation modelwhat disclosures to one based on control and economics, and replacedprovide about fair value measurements. For fair value measurements categorized as level 3, a reporting entity should disclose quantitative primary beneficiary analysis with a qualitative analysis. The primary beneficiary of a VIE will be the entity that has (1) the power to direct the activitiesinformation of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performanceunobservable inputs and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. If multiple unrelated parties share such power, as defined, no party will be required to consolidate the VIE. Further, the amended guidance requires continual reconsiderationassumptions, a description of the primary beneficiaryvaluation processes and narrative description of a VIE and adds an additional reconsideration event for determinationthe sensitivity of whether an entitythe fair value to changes in unobservable inputs. This update is a VIE. Additionally, the amendment requires enhanced and expanded disclosures around VIEs. This amendment was effective for fiscal yearsinterim and annual periods beginning after NovemberDecember 15, 2009.2011. The adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2010update did not have a material effect onmaterially affect the Fund’sFund's condensed financial statements.

138

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative DisclosureDisclosures About Market Risk
  
 Not Applicable
  
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
  
 The information required by this item is contained in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
  
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
  
 

None

 

Item 9A. Controls &and Procedures
   
 (a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
   
  As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Fund’s general partner, under the supervision and with the participation of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of C&M Management Inc., carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Fund’s “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, with respect to each series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole.  Based on that evaluation, the Fund’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the disclosure controls and procedures with respect to each series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole, were adequate and effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to any series or the Fund as a whole required to be included in the Fund’s periodic SEC filings.

 

 (b)Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
   
  Management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) of each series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole. The Fund’s internal control system over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Fund’s management regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
   
  Due to inherent limitations, an internal control system over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
  The Fund's general partner, under the supervision and with the participation of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Boston Capital Associates IV LLC, assessed the effectiveness of the internal controls and procedures over financial reporting with respect to each series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole, as of March 31, 2012.2013. In making this assessment, the Fund's management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of March 31, 2012,2013, its internal control over financial reporting with respect to each series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole was effective.
   
 (c)Changes in Internal Controls
   
  There were no changes in the Fund management's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 20122013 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Fund management's internal control over financial reporting.
   
Item 9B. Other Information
   
  Not Applicable

PART III

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance of the Fund
  
 (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)  

 

The Fund has no directors or executives officers of its own. The following biographical information is presented for the partners of the General Partners and affiliates of those partners (including Boston Capital Partners, Inc. ("Boston Capital")) with principal responsibility for the Partnership's affairs.

 

John P. Manning, age 63,64, is co-founder, and since 1974 has been the President and Chief Executive Officer, of Boston Capital Corporation. As co-founder and CEO of Boston Capital, Mr. Manning’s primary responsibilities include strategic planning, business development and the continued oversight of newopportunities.In addition to his responsibilities at Boston Capital Corporation, Mr. Manning is a proactive leader in the multifamily real estate industry. He served in 1990 as a member of the Mitchell-Danforth Task Force, which reviewed and suggested reforms to the Low Income Housing Tax Credit program. He was the founding President of the Affordable Housing Tax Credit Coalition and is a former member of the board of the National Leased Housing Association. During the 1980s, he served as a member of the Massachusetts Housing Policy Committee as an appointee of the Governor of Massachusetts. In addition, Mr. Manning has testified before the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee and the U.S. Senate Finance Committee on the critical role of the private sector in the success of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit. In 1996, President Clinton appointed him to the President’s Advisory Committee on the Arts at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. In 1998, President Clinton appointed Mr. Manning to the President’s Export Council, the premiere committee comprised of major corporate CEOs that advise the President on matters of foreign trade and commerce. In 2003, he was appointed by Boston Mayor Tom Menino to the Mayors Advisory Panel on Housing. Mr. Manning sits on the Board of Directors of the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library in Boston where he serves as Chairman of the Distinguished Visitors Program. He is also on the Board of Directors of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. Mr. Manning is a graduate of Boston College.

 

Mr. Manning is the managing member of Boston Associates. Mr. Manning is also the principal of Boston Capital Corporation. While Boston Capital is not a direct subsidiary of Boston Capital Corporation, each of the entities is under the common control of Mr. Manning.

 

Jeffrey H. Goldstein,age5051, is Chief Operating Officer and has been the Director of Real Estate of Boston Capital Corporation since 1996. He directs Boston Capital Corporation’s comprehensive real estate services, which include all aspects of origination, underwriting, due diligence and acquisition. As COO, Mr. Goldstein is responsible for the financial and operational areas of Boston Capital Corporation and assists in the design and implementation of business development and strategic planning objectives. Mr. Goldstein previously served as the Director of the Asset Management division as well as the head of the dispositions and troubled assets group. Utilizing his 16 years experience in the real estate syndication and development industry, Mr. Goldstein has been instrumental in the diversification and expansion of BostonCapital Corporation’s businesses. Prior to joining Boston Capital Corporation in 1990, Mr. Goldstein was Manager of Finance for A.J. Lane & Co., where he was responsible for placing debt on all new construction projects and debt structure for existing apartment properties. Prior to that, he served as Manager for Homeowner Financial Services, a financial consulting firm for residential and commercial properties, and worked as an analyst responsible for budgeting and forecasting for the New York City Council Finance Division. He graduated from the University of Colorado and received his MBA from Northeastern University.

Kevin P. Costello,age 65,66, is Executive Vice President and has been the Director of Institutional Investing of Boston Capital Corporation since 1992 and serves on the firm’s Executive Committee. He is responsible for all corporate investment activity and has spent over 20 years in the real estate syndication and investment business. Mr. Costello’s prior responsibilities at Boston Capital Corporation have involved the management of the Acquisitions Department and the structuring and distribution of conventional and tax credit private placements. Prior to joining Boston Capital Corporation in 1987, he held positions with First Winthrop, Reynolds Securities and Bache & Company. Mr. Costello graduated from Stonehill College and received his MBA with honors from Rutgers’ Graduate School of Business Administration.

 

Marc N. Teal,age 48,49, has been Chief Financial Officer of Boston Capital Corporation since May2003. Mr. Teal previously served as Senior Vice President and Director of Accounting and prior to that served as Vice President of Partnership Accounting. He has been with Boston Capital Corporation since 1990. In his current role as CFO he oversees all of the accounting, financial reporting, SEC reporting, budgeting, audit, tax and compliance for Boston Capital Corporation, its affiliated entities and all Boston Capital Corporation sponsored programs. Additionally, Mr. Teal is responsible for maintaining all banking and borrowing relationships of Boston Capital Corporation and treasury management of all working capital reserves. He also oversees Boston Capital Corporation’s information and technology areas, including the strategic strategic planning for Boston Capital Corporation and its affiliaties. Prior to joining Boston Capital in 1990, Mr.

Teal was a Senior Accountant for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes, a multifaceted real estate company, and prior to that was a Senior Accountant for Liberty Real Estate Corp. He received a Bachelor of Science Accountancy from Bentley College and a Masters in Finance from Suffolk University.

 

(f)Involvement in certain legal proceedings.
  
 None.  
  
(g)Promoters and control persons.
  
 None.
  
(h) and (i)The Fund has no directors or executive officers and accordingly has no audit committee and no audit committee financial expert.  The Fund is not a listed issuer as defined in Regulation 10A-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  
 The general partner of the Fund, Boston Capital Associates IV LP, has adopted a Code of Ethics which applies to the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of C&M Management, Inc.  The Code of Ethics will be provided without charge to any person who requests it. Such request should be directed to, Marc N. Teal, Boston Capital Corp., One Boston Place, Boston, MA 02108.
Item 11.Executive Compensation
 (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)

 

The Fund has no officers or directors and no compensation committee. However, under the terms of the Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Fund, the Fund has paid or accrued obligations to the general partner and its affiliates for the following fees during the 20102013 fiscal year:

1.    An annual fund management fee based on .5 percent of the aggregate cost of all apartment complexes acquired by the Operating Partnerships, less the amount of reporting fees received, has been accrued or paid to Boston Capital Asset Management Limited Partnership. The annual fund management fees charged to operations for the year ended March 31, 20122013 was $5,052,521.

$4,523,004.

2.    The Fund has reimbursed or accrued as a payable to an affiliate of the general partner a total of $375,646$445,581 for amounts charged to operations during the year ended March 31, 2012.2013. The reimbursement is for items like postage, printing, travel, and overhead allocations.

 

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and ManagementandManagement and Related Partner Matters

 

 (a)Security ownership of certain beneficial owners.  

 

  As of March 31, 2012,2013, 83,651,080 BACs had been issued.  The following Series are known to have an investor, Everest Housing, 199 South Los Robles Ave. Suite 200, Pasadena, CA 91101, with holdings in excess of 5% of the total outstanding BACs in the series.

 

Series 21 6.10%
Series 22 8.64%
Series 23 6.72%
Series 26 8.56%
Series 27 9.23%
Series 28 8.17%
Series 29 7.20%
Series 30 7.26%
Series 31 6.84%
Series 32 9.24%
Series 33 8.23%
Series 34 9.18%
Series 35 7.90%
Series 36 6.96%
Series 37 8.55%
Series 38 8.98%
Series 39 8.31%
Series 40 6.04%
Series 41 9.68%
Series 42 6.82%
Series 43 7.35%
Series 44 7.33%
Series 45 5.30%
Series 46 7.08%

 

  As of March 31, 2012,2013, 83,651,080 BACs had been issued. The following Series are known to have an investor, Summit Venture, P.O. Box 47638, Phoenix, AZ 85068, with holdings in excess of 5% of the total outstanding BACs in the series.

 

Series 20 6.43%
Series 25 6.88%

  

 (b)Security ownership of management.

  

The general partner has a 1% interest in all profits, losses, credits and distributions of the Fund.

 (c)Changes in control.
   
  There exists no arrangement known to the Fund the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Fund.  There is a provision in the Fund’s Partnership Agreement which allows, under certain circumstances, the ability to change control.

  The Fund has no compensation plans under which interests in the Fund are authorized for issuance.
   
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 (a)Transactions with related persons
   
  The Fund has no officers or directors.  However, under the terms of the Prospectus, various kinds of compensation and fees are payable to the general partner and its affiliates during the organization and operation of the Fund. Additionally, the general partner will receive distributions from the Fund if there is cash available for distribution or residual proceeds as defined in the Fund Agreement.  See Note B of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for amounts accrued or paid to the general partner and its affiliates for the period April 1, 1995 through March 31, 2012.2013.

 (b)Review, Approval or Ratification of transactions with related persons.
   
  

The Fund’s response to Item 13(a) is incorporated herein by reference.

 (c)Promoters and certain control persons.
   
  Not applicable.
   
 (d)Independence.
   
  The Fund has no directors.

Item 14.Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services
Fees paid to the Fund’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2013 were comprised of the following:

Fee Type Ser. 20  Ser. 21  Ser. 22  Ser. 23  Ser. 24 
Audit Fees $15,081  $11,436  $17,106  $14,676  $16,296 
                     
Audit Related Fees  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Tax Fees  6,170   4,370   6,970   5,970   6,570 
                     
All Other Fees  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Total $21,251  $15,806  $24,076  $20,646  $22,866 

Fee Type Ser. 25  Ser. 26  Ser. 27  Ser. 28  Ser. 29 
Audit Fees $14,676  $24,399  $14,274  $18,729  $16,704 
                     
Audit Related Fees  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Tax Fees  6,170   10,570   5,570   7,770   6,770 
                     
All Other Fees  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Total $20,846  $34,969  $19,844  $26,499  $23,474 

Fee Type Ser. 30  Ser. 31  Ser. 32  Ser. 33  Ser. 34 
Audit Fees $15,084  $18,729  $14,274  $11,844  $13,869 
                     
Audit Related Fees  -   265   530   -   - 
                     
Tax Fees  5,970   7,770   5,570   4,370   5,370 
                     
All Other Fees  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Total $21,054  $26,764  $20,374  $16,214  $19,239 
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services - continued
Fees paid to the Fund’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2013 were comprised of the following:

Fee Type Ser. 35  Ser. 36  Ser. 37  Ser. 38  Ser. 39 
Audit Fees $12,654  $12,654  $11,034  $12,249  $11,844 
                     
Audit Related Fees  1,060   530   530   1,590   1,590 
                     
Tax Fees  4,770   4,770   3,970   4,570   4,370 
                     
All Other Fees  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Total $18,484  $17,954  $15,534  $18,409  $17,804 

Fee Type Ser. 40  Ser. 41  Ser. 42  Ser. 43  Ser. 44 
Audit Fees $14,679  $16,299  $17,109  $17,514  $12,249 
                     
Audit Related Fees  3,975   4,505   4,240   5,300   2,120 
                     
Tax Fees  5,770   6,570   6,970   7,170   4,970 
                     
All Other Fees  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Total $24,424  $27,374  $28,319  $29,984  $19,339 

Fee Type Ser. 45  Ser. 46 
Audit Fees $20,349  $14,274 
         
Audit Related Fees  7,420   3,975 
         
Tax Fees  8,570   5,570 
         
All Other Fees  -   - 
         
Total $36,339  $23,819 
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services - continued
  
 Fees paid to the Fund’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2012 were comprised of the following:

Fee Type Ser. 20  Ser. 21  Ser. 22  Ser. 23  Ser. 24 
Audit Fees $16,273  $11,923  $17,848  $15,873  $15,873 
                     
Audit Related Fees  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Tax Fees  6,585   4,635   7,949   6,585   6,585 
                     
All Other Fees  380   380   380   380   380 
                     
Total $23,238  $16,938  $26,177  $22,838  $22,838 

 

Fee Type Ser. 25  Ser. 26  Ser. 27  Ser. 28  Ser. 29 
Audit Fees $15,873  $24,948  $14,298  $18,248  $16,276 
                     
Audit Related Fees  -   -   260   -   260 
                     
Tax Fees  6,195   10,875   5,609   7,365   6,585 
                     
All Other Fees  380   380   380   380   380 
                     
Total $22,448  $36,203  $20,547  $25,993  $23,501 

 

Fee Type Ser. 30  Ser. 31  Ser. 32  Ser. 33  Ser. 34 
Audit Fees $15,076  $18,251  $14,301  $11,926  $13,501 
                     
Audit Related Fees  520   260   1,560   780   1,040 
                     
Tax Fees  5,805   7,365   6,975   4,635   5,025 
                     
All Other Fees  380   380   380   380   380 
                     
Total $21,781  $26,256  $23,216  $17,721  $19,946 
Item 14.Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services - continued
  
 Fees paid to the Fund’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2012 were comprised of the following:

 

Fee Type Ser. 35  Ser. 36  Ser. 37  Ser. 38  Ser. 39 
Audit Fees $12,326  $12,326  $10,751  $11,926  $11,526 
                     
Audit Related Fees  1,560   1,820   780   2,340   2,340 
                     
Tax Fees  4,440   4,440   3,660   4,440   4,245 
                     
All Other Fees  380   380   380   380   380 
                     
Total $18,706  $18,966  $15,571  $19,086  $18,491 

 

Fee Type Ser. 40  Ser. 41  Ser. 42  Ser. 43  Ser. 44 
Audit Fees $14,301  $16,276  $16,676  $17,051  $11,926 
                     
Audit Related Fees  3,380   3,640   2,600   4,160   2,080 
                     
Tax Fees  6,389   6,585   6,585   8,145   4,245 
                     
All Other Fees  380   380   380   380   380 
                     
Total $24,450  $26,881  $26,241  $29,736  $18,631 

 

Fee Type Ser. 45  Ser. 46 
Audit Fees $19,826  $13,901 
         
Audit Related Fees  7,280   3,900 
         
Tax Fees  8,145   5,220 
         
All Other Fees  380   380 
         
Total $35,631  $23,401 
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services- continued
Fees paid to the Fund’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2011 were comprised of the following:

Fee Type Ser. 20  Ser. 21  Ser. 22  Ser. 23  Ser. 24 
Audit Fees $16,225  $12,750  $18,928  $16,228  $17,003 
                     
Audit Related Fees  -   255   -   -   - 
                     
Tax Fees  6,730   4,975   8,095   6,730   7,120 
                     
All Other Fees  -   520   -   -   - 
                     
Total $22,955  $18,500  $27,023  $22,958  $24,123 

Fee Type Ser. 25  Ser. 26  Ser. 27  Ser. 28  Ser. 29 
Audit Fees $16,228  $25,078  $13,903  $17,753  $15,828 
                     
Audit Related Fees  765   1,530   1,020   1,020   1,275 
                     
Tax Fees  6,730   11,410   5,755   7,510   6,730 
                     
All Other Fees  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Total $23,723  $38,018  $20,678  $26,283  $23,833 

Fee Type Ser. 30  Ser. 31  Ser. 32  Ser. 33  Ser. 34 
Audit Fees $14,678  $17,753  $13,903  $11,603  $13,153 
                     
Audit Related Fees  2,295   2,295   2,805   1,275   2,040 
                     
Tax Fees  5,950   7,510   7,120   4,780   5,170 
                     
All Other Fees  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Total $22,923  $27,558  $23,828  $17,658  $20,363 
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services- continued
Fees paid to the Fund’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2011 were comprised of the following:

Fee Type Ser. 35  Ser. 36  Ser. 37  Ser. 38  Ser. 39 
Audit Fees $11,978  $11,978  $10,453  $11,603  $11,228 
                     
Audit Related Fees  1,785   2,295   1,275   2,295   2,295 
                     
Tax Fees  4,585   4,585   3,805   4,585   4,390 
                     
All Other Fees  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Total $18,348  $18,858  $15,533  $18,483  $17,913 

Fee Type Ser. 40  Ser. 41  Ser. 42  Ser. 43  Ser. 44 
Audit Fees $13,903  $15,828  $16,603  $16,603  $11,603 
                     
Audit Related Fees  3,825   3,825   3,825   5,100   2,040 
                     
Tax Fees  6,535   6,730   6,925   8,290   4,390 
                     
All Other Fees  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Total $24,263  $26,383  $27,353  $29,993  $18,033 

Fee Type Ser. 45  Ser. 46          
Audit Fees $19,303  $13,528             
                     
Audit Related Fees  7,395   3,825             
                     
Tax Fees  8,290   5,365             
                     
All Other Fees  -   -             
                     
Total $34,988  $22,718                

 

Audit Committee
  
 The Fund has no Audit Committee.  All audit services and any permitted non-audit services performed by the Fund’s independent auditors are pre-approved by C&M Management, Inc.

PART IV

 

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a) 1 & 2Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules; Filed herein as Exhibit 13
  
 Boston Capital Tax Credit IV L.P.; filed herein as Exhibit 13

 

 Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
Balance Sheets, March 31, 20122013 and 20112012
  
 Statements of Operations for the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 20112012
  
 Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital (Deficit) for the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 20112012
  
 Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 20122013 and 20112012
  
 Notes to Financial Statements, March 31, 20122013 and 20112012

 

 Schedules not listed are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the information is included in the financial statements or the notes thereto.
  
(b) 1Exhibits (listed according to the number assigned in the table in Item 601 of Regulation S-K)

 

Exhibit No. 3 - Organization Documents.

Exhibit No. 3 - Organization Documents.  

 

a.Certificate of Limited Partnership of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3 to the Fund's Registration Statement No. 33-70564 on Form S-11 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 19, 1993).

 

Exhibit No. 4 - Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures.

Exhibit No. 4 - Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures.  

 

a.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.  (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4 to the Fund's Registration Statement No. 33-70564 on Form S-11 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 19, 1993).

 

Exhibit No. 10 - Material contracts.

Exhibit No. 10 - Material contracts.  

 

a.Beneficial Assignee Certificate.  (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10A to the Fund's Registration Statement No. 33-70564 on Form S-11 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 19, 1993).

 

Exhibit No. 13 - Financial Statements.

Exhibit No. 13 - Financial Statements.

 

a.Financial Statement of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.; Filed herein

Exhibit No. 23 - Consents of experts and counsel.

Exhibit No. 23 - Consents of experts and counsel.

 

a.Independent Auditor's Reports for Operating Partnerships; Filed herein.

 

Exhibit No. 28 - Additional exhibits.

Exhibit No. 28 - Additional exhibits.

 

a.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Better Homes for Havelock Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 1, 1995).

b.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cynthiana Properties Limited (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 1, 1995).

c.Agreement of Limited Partnership of North Hampton Place Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 13, 1995).

d.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Brook Summitt Apartments, LP (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 1996).

e.Agreement of Limited Partnership of New Madison Park IV Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 1997).

f.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Smith House II Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 1997).

g.Agreement of Limited Partnership of New Madison Park IV Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 1997).

h.Agreement of Limited Partnership of M.R.H.,L.P. (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 1997).

i.Agreement of Limited Partnership of 352 Lenox Associates, L.P.(Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 1997).

j.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Decro Nordoff, L.P. (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current  report on Form 8-K  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 1997).
161

k.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hurricane Hills, L.P. (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 1997).

l.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Main Everett Housing, L.P. (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 1997).

m.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Mokapoke Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 1997).

n.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Autumn Ridge L.P. (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

o.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Century East Apartments II Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

p.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Coolidge-Pinal II Associates (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

q.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Dublin Housing Associates Phase II (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

r.Agreement of Limited Partnership of East Park Apartments II Limited Partnership(Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

s.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Edenfield Place Apartments, L.P. (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

t.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ethel Housing, L.P. (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

u.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Los Lunas Limited Partnership(Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

v.Agreement of Limited Partnership of New Devonshire West, Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

w.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Northfield Housing, L.P.(Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

x.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ohio Investors Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

y.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Osborne Housing, L.P.(Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

z.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Overton Associates Limited Partnership(Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

aa.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Pahrump Valley Investors (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

ab.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Osborne Housing, L.P.(Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

ac.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Shannon Housing, L.P. (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

ad.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sutton Place Apartments (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

ae.Agreement of Limited Partnership of West Point Housing, L.P.(Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997).

af.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Jeremy Associates Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 1997).

ag.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Laurelwood Park Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 1997).

ah.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Jeremy Associates Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 1997).
ai.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Roxbury Housing Veterans Limited Partnership (Incorporated by reference from Registrant's current report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 1997).

aj.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Elm Street Associates, L.P. (incorporated by reference from Registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 7, 1997.)

ak.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Brookhaven Apartments Partnership (incorporated by reference from Registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 21, 1997.)

al.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Maple Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from Registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 1997.)

am.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Byam Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from Registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 1997.)

an.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Harbor Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 1997.)

ao.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Bradley Phase II Limited Partnership (incorporated by Reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 1997.)

ap.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Butler Street/Hanover Towers Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 1997.)

aq.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Bradley Phase I Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 1997.)

ar.Agreement of Limited Partnership of 1374 Boston Road Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5, 1997.)

as.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Centenary Housing Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5, 1997.)

at.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Lake Apartments II Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5, 1997.)
au.Agreement of Limited Partnership of AHAB Project One, LP (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 1997.)

av.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Grandview Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 1998.)

aw.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Angelou Associates, L.P. (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 1998.)

ax.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Country Edge Apartments I Limited Partnership(incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-k as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 1998.)

ay.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sumner House Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 1998.)

az.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Magnolia Place Apartments Partnerships (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 1998.)

ba.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Edgewood Apartments Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 1998.)

bb.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Harrisonville Heights L.P. (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 1998.)

bc.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Neighborhood Restorations Limited Partnership VII incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 1998.)

bd.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Escher SRO Project, L.P. (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 1998.)

be.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Silver Creek/MHT Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 1999.)

bf.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Meridian Housing Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 1999.)
bg.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Southaven Partners I, L.P. (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange on July 27, 1999.)

bh.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Athens Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 27, 1999.)

bi.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Pearl Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 30, 1999.)

bj.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Harbor Pointe/MHT Limited Dividend Housing Association Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 28, 1999.)

bk.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Level Creek Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 1999.)

bl.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Lake City Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 3, 2000.)

bm.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Pine Ridge Apartments Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange on on February 9, 2000.)

bn.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Pecan Manor Apartments Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10, 2000.)

bo.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Pyramid Four Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2000.)

bp.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Lombard Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 26, 2000.)

bq.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Belmont Affordable Housing II LP (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2000.)

br.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Jackson Bond LP (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2000.)

bs.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Fort Bend NHC, L.P. (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2000.)

bt.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Breezewood II, L.P. (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 30, 2002.)

bu.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Wingfield Apartments II L.P. (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2002.)

bv.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Natchez Place Apartments L.P. (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2002.)

bw.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Rural Housing Partners of Mendota LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 30, 2002.)

bx.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Springfield Metro (incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2003.)

by.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Rural Housing Partners of Mt. Carroll LP incorporated(incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2003.)

bz.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Meadowside Associates incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2003.)

ca.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Los Lunas Apts. LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2003.)

cb.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Edna Vanderbilt incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2003.)

cc.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hawthorne Assoc. LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2003.)

cd.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Rural Housing Partners of Franklin Grove LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2003.)
ce.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Rural Housing Partners of Fulton LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2003.)

cf.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Heritage Two LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2003.)

cg.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Parkhurst Place incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2003.)

ch.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hattiesburg Housing LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

ci.Agreement of Limited Partnership of 1374 Boston Road LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

cj.Agreement of Limited Partnership of 200 East Avenue Associates LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

ck.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Casa Rosa Apartments incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

cl.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Lake Apartments II LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

cm.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Northrock Housing Associates LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

cn.Agreement of Limited Partnership of AHAB Project One LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

co.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Randolph Village Associates LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

cp.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Sr. Suites Chicago Austin LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

cq.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Clubview Partners LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)
cr.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Edgewood Apartments Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

cs.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Harbor Pointe/MHT LDHA LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

ct.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Lombard Partners LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

cu.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Millwood Park LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

cv.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Hillside Terrace Associates LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

cw.Agreement of Limited Partnership of San Angelo Bent Tree Apts. LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

cx.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Montfort Housing LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

cy.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Summerdale Partners LP II incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

cz.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Seagraves Apartments LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

da.Agreement of Limited Partnership of FFLM Associates LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

db.Agreement of Limited Partnership of COGIC Village LDHA LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dc.Agreement of Limited Partnership of FFLM Associates LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dd.Agreement of Limited Partnership of FFLM Associates LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)
de.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Pyramid Four Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

df.Agreement of Limited Partnership of 200 East Avenue Associates LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dg.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Parkside Plaza LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dh.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Granada Rose LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

di.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Northrock Housing Assoc. LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dj.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Southaven Partners I LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dk.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Howard Park Ltd incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dl.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Washington Courtyards LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dm.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Highway Partners 18 LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dn.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Wedgewood Park LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

do.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Washington Courtyards LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dp.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Annadale Housing Partners incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dq.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ashton Ridge LDHA LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)
dr.Agreement of Limited Partnership of FAH Silver Pond LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

ds.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ashton Ridge LDHA LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dt.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Aldine Westfield Apts., LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

du.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Arbors at Eagle Crest LDHA LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dv.Agreement of Limited Partnership of KC Shalom Housing LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dw.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Breeze Cove Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dx.Agreement of Limited Partnership of DS Housing LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dy.Agreement of Limited Partnership of CC Housing LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

dz.Agreement of Limited Partnership of TS Housing LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

ea.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Carpenter School I Elderly Apts. LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

eb.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Lyceum Housing LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

ec.Agreement of Limited Partnership of New Shinnston I LP incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003.)

ed.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Lyceum Housing Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current  report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on March 31, 2004.)
ee.Agreement of Limited Partnership of New Shinniston I Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2004.)

ef.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Gilbert Apartments Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2004.)

eg.Agreement of Limited Partnership of HS Housing Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2004.

eh.Agreement of Limited Partnership of SM Housing Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2004.)

ei.Agreement of Limited Partnership of CT Housing Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2004.)

ej.Agreement of Limited Partnership of North Fort Aspen Plus Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26,2004.)

ek.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Strawberry Lake Apartments Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2004.)

el.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Byam Village Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 28, 2004.)

em.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Kiehl Partners Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 28, 2004.)

en.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Trinity Life Gardens Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29,2004.)

eo.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Athens Partners, LP Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 2004.)

ep.Agreement of Limited Partnership of San Diego/Fox Hollow Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 1, 2004.)
eq.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Elma Gardens of Grays Harbor Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 2, 2004.)

er.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Kimberly Danbury Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 2, 2004.)

es.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Tanglewood Village Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2004.)

et.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Portland Ocean East I Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 24, 2005.)

eu.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Clayton Station Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 24, 2005.)

ev.Agreement of Limited Partnership of Deer Meadows Limited Partnership incorporated by reference from registrants current report on form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 24, 2005.)

 

Exhibit No. 31 Certification 302

Exhibit No. 31 Certification 302

 

a.Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herein
b.Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herein

 

b.Exhibit No. 32 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herein906

 

Exhibit No. 32 Certification 906

a.Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herein

 

b.Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herein

 

Exhibit No. 101

Exhibit No. 101

 

The following materials from the Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2012 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Statements of Operations, (iii) the Condensed Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital (Deficit), (iv) the Condensed Statements of Cash Flows and (v) related notes, furnished herewith

The following materials from the Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2013 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Balance Sheets, (ii) the Statements of Operations, (iii) the Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital (Deficit), (iv) the Statements of Cash Flows and (v) related notes, furnished herewith

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Fund has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.  
 
By:

Boston Capital Associates IV L.P.

General Partner

  
 By:

BCABoston Capital Associates Limited Partnership

IV L.P.

General Partner

   
 By:

BCA Associates Limited Partnership

General Partner
By:C&M Management, Inc.

General Partner

   
Date: July 13, 201210, 2013 By:/s/ John P. Manning
   John P. Manning

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Fund and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

DATE: SIGNATURE: TITLE:
     
July 13, 201210, 2013 /s/ John P. Manning Director, President (Principal
  John P. Manning (Principal Executive
Officer), C&M
    Management, Inc.;
Director, President
    (Principal Executive Officer) BCTC
    Officer) BCTC IV
Assignor Corp.
     
July 13, 2012 10, 2013 /s/ Marc N. Teal Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial
  Marc N. Teal Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and
    Financial Officer) C&M Management
Inc.; Sr. Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer (Principal
    Accounting and
Financial Officer) 
C&M Management Inc.; 
Sr. Vice President, 
Chief Financial 
Officer (Principal
Accounting and
Financial Officer)
    BCTC IV Assignor
Corp.

   

163174