UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
OR
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from __________ to _________
Commission file number 0-935
_______________________
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 36-4296006 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(407) 996-9630
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
| None | Not Applicable |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes¨ Noþ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes¨ Noþ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ No¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yesþ No¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ | Accelerated filer ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer¨ | Smaller reporting companyþ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the Company was $1,426,634,$9,145,062, based upon the closing price of shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, of $0.02$3.00 as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board on June 28, 2013,December 31, 2014, the last day of the Company’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding as ofApril 7, 2014 May 07, 2015 was1,904,591,796
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
MEDITE CANCER DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
December 31, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||
PART I | ||
Item | ||
Item | ||
Item 2. | 24 | |
Item 3. | ||
Item 4. | ||
| PART II | ||
Item 5. | ||
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | 26 |
| Item 7. | ||
Item 8. | ||
Item 9. | ||
Item 9A. | ||
Item 9B. | ||
| PART III | ||
Item 10. | ||
Item 11. | ||
Item 12. | ||
Item 13. | ||
Item 14. | ||
| PART IV | ||
Item 15. | 40 | |
| Signatures | ||
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains “forward-looking statements” – that is, statements related to future, not past, events. In this context, forward-looking statements often address our expected future business and financial performance and financial condition, and often contain words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “see,” or “will.” Forward-looking statements by their nature address matters that are, to different degrees, uncertain. For us, particular uncertainties that could cause our actual results to be materially different than those expressed in our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: our ability to raise capital; our ability to retain key employees; our ability to engage third party distributors to sell our products; economic conditions; technological advances in the medical field; demand and market acceptance risks for new and existing products, technologies, and healthcare services; the impact of competitive products and pricing; U.S. and international regulatory, trade, and tax policies; product development risks, including technological difficulties; ability to enforce patents; and numerous other matters of national, regional and global scale, including those of a political, economic, business and competitive nature. These uncertainties may cause our actual future results to be materially different than those expressed in our forward-looking statements. These uncertainties are described in more detail in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements.
Business |
Overview
MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”, “we”, or “us”), formerly Molecular Diagnostics,CytoCore, Inc., is developing,a medical technology company specializing in the development, engineering, manufacturing and plans to sell, an integrated familymarketing of cost-effective productspremium medical devices and consumables for the detection, diagnosis and treatment of cancer under the trade name ofCytoCore Solutions®. CytoCore Solutions products are intended to address sample collection, specimen preparation, specimen evaluation (including detection/screening and diagnosis), treatment and patient monitoring within vertical markets related to specific cancers. CurrentCytoCore Solutions products are focused upon cervical and breast cancer. We plan that this focus will later be expanded to include other gynecological cancers as well as bladder, lung, oral and anal cancers, among others. Within each of these markets, we anticipate that theCytoCore Solutions products will be sold as individual value-added drop-in replacements for existing products and as integrated systems that improve the efficiency and effectiveness of clinical and laboratory operations.
The year 2014 was a transition year and very important for the company with challenges, tremendous achievements and changes for the company. By acquiring MEDITE the company changed from solely research operations to an operating company with 76 employees in three countries, a distribution network to about 70 countries worldwide, a well-known and established brand name, a wide range of selling products and the established infrastructure necessary for a company acting in the medical industry. Both company structures and cultures were successfully merged to one new company organization.
Even during this transition year the company was successfully growing by 10 % to a revenue of $11 million on a consolidated basis.
Several synergies were realized with this strategy, e.g. a cost reduction of the former CytoCore research segment by about 50 %, complementary products in the cytology product segment in now addressing all components from cell collection through improved specimen qualitycell processing to finally diagnostic tools like cancer markers and accuracyscreening systems. Some of them are already selling and some are in a late stage of development expecting to sell within one or two years.
The cancer markers developed by the former CytoCore over the last three years are showing excellent results in internal studies but have not yet been tested in formal clinical trials. In our opinion, one of the tests based upon these biomarkers has the potential for displacing the current expensive Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) testing methods in both initial and follow up testing resulting in less costs for the patient, laboratory and payor. We believe the test results, bothmay identify cancerous and precancerous cells regardless of the presence of HPV. The company hopes to market the test globally outside the United States in terms2015 and in the United States by 2017.
Another major goal achieved in 2014 was the market entrance into China, the fastest growing and by 2016 we expect to be the largest market for our products. With our Chinese distributor UNIC Medical we successfully received China Food and Drug Administration (“CFDA”) approval for all MEDITE histology laboratory devices. The UNIC sales team now can sell MEDITE products in China and currently we are successfully doing so. By the date of this report orders for over $500,000 from China are already placed. Also, together with UNIC, we are part of a lower incidencegovernment supported project to standardize the histology laboratory process there using MEDITE equipment and consumables for the processing part of false negativesthe process, CytoCore assays, and fewer inadequate collectionsthe UNIC technology for digitalization and computer aided diagnostics utilizing the latest cloud technology.
Several other innovative product developments were brought closer to marketability in 2014. As of samples.this filing, the German priority patent for a fully automated system used in the histology lab, a “Lab-In-One” unit, has been granted. This technology if successfully accepted by the market has the ability to change the competitive landscape within the industry.
In our cytology product line the SureThin product line revenue grew in Europe. To sell the complete set in the US and therefore compete against the dominant suppliers, a US Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) application is required to be submitted and approved which currently is in the preparation process and is expected to be submitted soon. If our Sure Thin product is successfully sold in the USA market, the company could garner significant share of a $600m market.
Finally several important formal achievements for the OTC listing were also realized in changing the Company’s name to MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics, Inc., using the worldwide established brand and having a better description of the Company’s focus in it. We also believecompleted a 1:100 reverse split of our outstanding common stock which significantly reduced the system will expandamount of our outstanding shares of common stock and also had the numbereffect of women who can be tested, thereby increasing detection and diagnosis rates.
Background
We were incorporated in Delaware in December 1998 as the successor to Bell National Corporation, a company incorporated in California in 1958. In December 1998, Bell National, which was then a shell corporation, acquired InPath, LLC, a development stage company engaged in the design and development of products used in screening for cervical and other types of cancer. For accounting purposes, the acquisition was treated as if InPath had acquired Bell National. However, Bell National continued as the legal entity and the registrant for Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filing purposes. Bell National merged into Ampersand Medical Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary, in May 1999, in order to change its state of incorporation to Delaware.
Recent Developments
On January 11, 2014, MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics, Inc. (formerly CytoGlobe, Inc., the “Company“Company”) entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase“Purchase Agreement”) with MediteMEDITE Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Medite”MEDITE”), Medite GMBH,MEDITE GmbH, a corporation organized under the laws of Germany and wholly owned by MediteMEDITE (the “Subsidiary”), Michael Ott and Michaela Ott, the sole shareholders of the Company (collectively, the “Shareholders”).
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of MediteMEDITE from the Shareholders in exchange for the issuance of up to 1,500,000,00015,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) to the Shareholders. The Purchase Agreement also provides that the Shareholders will indemnify the Company for certain losses during the one year period following the closing.“Closing” as defined in the Purchase Agreement. In connection with such indemnification rights, the Purchase Agreement provides that 375,000,0003,750,000 of the Shares will be deposited with the Company and held for a period of 12 months to cover certain indemnification claims that the Company may have against the Shareholders.
MEDITE specializes in the development, manufacture and distribution of medical laboratory automation equipment and supplies for the cancer diagnostic segments of pathology, histology and cytology. Medite’sMEDITE’s focus is on the development of medical devices and consumables for detection, risk assessment and diagnosis of cancer and related diseases.
Closing of the acquisition of MediteMEDITE was conditioned upon: (i) the completion of a private placement transaction resulting in gross cash proceeds to the Company of $1.25 million (the “Private Placement”), and (ii) the conversion of certain accrued wages of the Company into shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, as of the closing,Closing, there shall be no more than 1,875,000,00018,750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock exclusive of any shares of the Company’s common stock issued in connection with the Private Placement.
On April 3, 2014, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement, as amended to date, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of MediteMEDITE in exchange for the issuance of up to 1,500,000,00015,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Shareholders, of which 1,468,750,00014,687,500 shares were issued upon the closingClosing of the Acquisition. In the event that the Company issues less than $2,500,000 of shares of common stock in the Private Placement, the Company shall be required to issue up to an additional 31,250,000312,500 shares of common stock to the Shareholders..Shareholders. Also, the Company issued 69,723,439697,234 shares of common stock for payment of certain accrued wages of the Company.
Upon closingthe Closing of the Acquisition, the Company conducted an initial closing of the Private Placement. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement executed in connection with the Private Placement, the Company issued 95,587,500955,875 shares of common stock to accredited investors for an aggregate gross purchase price of $1,529,400.
After closing this Private Placement was continued until October 28, 2014, and the Company received the amount of $295,000 in exchange for the issuance of an additional 184,375 shares.
To continue financing the business development of the Company, a subsequent private placement of unregistered common stock of up to $800,000 for a price of $1.60 per share for the period of November 1, 2014 until April 30, 2015 was offered to investors pursuant to Section 4(2) and Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Second Private Placement”). As of April 15, 2015, $540,000 was received by the Company in exchange for 337,500 shares pursuant to the Second Private Placement.
On September 26, 2014, the Company obtained the written consent of the holders of the majority of the issued and outstanding shares of its common stock to amended its Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock that it is authorized to issue from 2,000,000,000 to 3,500,000,000. This was approved by the board of directors of the Company (the “Board”) pursuant to a Resolution dated October 9th, 2014.
To use the well-established brand of MEDITE and to have a better description of the company’s business, the Board approved the name change to “MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics, Inc.” As a result, the Company’s trading symbol was changed to “MDIT”.
The Company authorized and completed a reverse split of its common stock of 1:100 to support its present capital needs and future anticipated growth. This was effective March 12, 2015. As a result of the reverse split, the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock was reduced from 1,942,733 to 19,427,331.
Information Aboutabout Industry Segments
The Company operates in one industry segment involving medicalfor cancer diagnostics instruments and consumables for histology and cytology laboratories.
| Definition: | Histology - Cancer diagnostics based on the structures of cells in tissues Cytology - Cancer diagnostics based on the structures of individual cells |
Cancers and precancerous conditions are defined in terms of structural abnormalities in cells. For this reason cytology is widely used for the detection of such conditions while histology is typically used for the confirmation, identification and characterization of the cellular abnormalities detected by cytology. Other diagnostics methods such as marker-based assays provide additional information that can supplement, but which cannot replace cytology and histology. The trend towards more personalized treatment of cancer increases the need for cytology, histology and assays for identifying and testing the best treatment alternatives. We believe that this segment will therefore be increasingly important for future development of strategies to fight the “cancer epidemic” (World Health Organization: World Cancer Report 2014) which expects about a 50 % increase in cancer cases worldwide within the next 20 years.
This segment sees a trend toward, and demand for, higher automation for more throughput in bigger laboratories, process standardization, digitalization of cell and tissue slides and computer aided diagnostic systems, while also looking for cost effective solutions. In the US the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is a national example for the industry. More people have health insurance and therefore can afford early cancer screening, devices, diagnostics,while at the same time the payers for health care continue looking for cost reductions.
MEDITE acts as a one-stop-shop for histology (also known as anatomic pathology) laboratories either as part of a hospital, as part of a chain of laboratories or individually. It is one out of only four companies offering all equipment and supplies. consumables for these laboratories worldwide. The MEDITE Brand stands for innovative and high quality products – most equipment made in Germany – and competitive pricing.
For the cytology market, MEDITE offers a wide range of consumable products and equipment; in particular for liquid-based-cytology which is an important tool in cancer screening and detection in the field of cervical, bladder, breast, lung and other cancer types. It also developed an innovative new type of easy to use standardized staining solutions, and a very innovative and effective early cancer detection marker-based assay. These new developments are cost effective solutions able to replace more expensive competitive products, and therefore are also becoming the first choice for the growing demand in emerging countries.
All of our operations during the reporting period were conducted and managed within this segment,these two segments, with a single management team that reportsteams reporting directly to our Chief Executive Officer.Officers. For information on revenues, profit or loss and total assets, among other financial data, attributable to our operations, see the consolidated financial statements included herein.
| 5 |
Description of Business
MEDITE develops, manufactures and sells a wide range of laboratory devices and consumable supplies for its target market in the histology and cytology cancer diagnostics segment. Therefore, most devices and some consumables are manufactured at its German facility. This facility also acts as central location managing all international sales and logistics outside of the Americas. A direct sales force is employed in Germany, Poland and the US, while about 70 more countries worldwide are covered with an existing and continuously expanding network of independent distributors. A general goal of MEDITE in sales is to act as a one- stop-shop for its customers. Instrument purchases are usually bigger investments, with prices often above the $50,000 level, which are more seasonal and depend significantly on investment budgets. Therefore, MEDITE also offers to sell the day to day consumables and sees its brand not just on the devices but also on the supply products. The US headquarters in Orlando manages the Company group and is developing, setting and realizing the strategic goals of the Company. It also acts as distributor for the Americas, maintaining a warehouse with instruments, repair parts and consumables available for sale and for warranty obligations to its customers, and taking care of centralized marketing, regulatory issues and finance. A second location in the US operates as our research laboratory for cancer marker and other cytology developments, and is located in the Chicago area. In 2014, we established a new research and development facility in Poland, so that we can derive local cost comparative advantages (facilities and salaries) with good availability of engineers for electronics, software and product design at a lower cost level than in Germany or the US to expand the Company’s development capabilities.
For sales, MEDITE is targeting three major areas; USA, Europe and China. While the US is currently the biggest market for our products at present, it is expected that China will surpass the US market by 2016 due to much higher growth rates that China is currently experiencing, and we expect such growth will continue in the future.
Currently, our principal customers are histology and cytology laboratories associated with hospitals or research institutions and independent laboratories in markets with direct sales and distributors in markets covered by them. In the US market, MEDITE executed several distribution contracts with third party sales organizations additionally to its direct sales. It also successfully achieved contracts with three of the largest Hospital Group Purchasing Organizations: HealthTrust Purchasing Group, Brentwood, MA (“HealthTrust”), which oversees approximately 1,400 hospitals and 2,600 other sites, Premier, Charlotte, NC, which oversees 2,500 hospitals, and another 70,000 other healthcare sites and Mid-Atlantic Group Network of Shared Services (“Magnet”) with over 600 hospitals and approximately 4,000 other healthcare sites.
For manufacturing of its high quality devices at the German facility, an enterprise resource planning software is used to manage the material flow and production planning for about 6,000 different parts. Due to the wide range of products, the availability of all parts is essential to finish a manufactured product within an acceptable lead time. Smaller equipment items and all consumable products have to be available at any time to guarantee the customer continues work. Usually orders of these goods are sent within 24 hours after receiving the order, while for the bigger equipment, delivery times of 6 weeks are usually acceptable. Even due to different models of the same devices, the final assembling usually starts after the confirmed order.
The Company’s strategy is to use its recent new developed innovative devices, consumables and cancer markers to set new standards in the industry, create new markets and to take over additional market shares from its competition.
Products
Histology
MEDITE offers its customers a comprehensive range of histology laboratory devices for processing tissue, from receiving the tissue in the laboratory to the final diagnosis. Most important to this segment are very high levels of reliability, efficiency, and safety.
Starting from receiving the biopsies, it can be necessary to decalcify them if for example from bone. TheUSE33is an ultrasonic decalcification instrument that automatically runs the process under controlled temperatures. Due to this innovative technology, it can increase the speed of decalcification by 300 % compared to just using acid. Instead of days or even weeks, the biopsies are ready much earlier for further processing, which shortens the patient’s diagnosis waiting time. This specific instrument also is often used in research labs.
The next step is the tissue processing (dehydration and fixation), which usually is run automatically by the laboratory overnight with no human supervision. Our instrument, theTPC15Duo or Trio, offers a very high capacity of 440 or 660 biopsies per run and also offers two or three independent protocols. Therefore, depending on the size and kind of tissue, it can process simultaneously the different steps, and therefore is replacing two or three not so flexible competitive instruments. It also offers a very high level of safety. In the unlikely situation of an error or just a power outage, it has a back-up battery, and the emergency mode puts the biopsies into a safe position. The price of the unit is very competitive in its market based on its high capacity.
After tissue processing, the tissue will be transferred into a paraffin block using an embedding center. MEDITE was the original inventor of the three piece units (heating, dispensing, and cooling). It is much more flexible to adapt to human and laboratory needs. While the dispensing unit usually is in the center, the others can be added to the right or left depending if right or left handed. Additional cooling units can also be added to extend the capacity. We offer two types: the low cost setTES99when price matters, and the high end versionTES Validawhen design and technology is more important. The TES Valida is recognized as the best system currently available worldwide. Every histology lab has at least one system, but usually two or more like this in place – meaning several thousand units placed each year.
With the paraffin block from the embedding center, the biopsy needs to be sectioned using a microtome. Several types of automation are demanded by the market. On the low end, there are manual microtomes with no need for power, in the middle there is the semi-automatic version, and on the high end, a fully automatic microtome. While originally all microtome manufacturers were located in Europe (Germany or UK), today only MEDITE still manufactures its microtomes in Germany. For a microtome, the most critical functionality is extremely precise mechanics able to cut slices of 1 or 2 microns in thickness. Five years ago, MEDITE developed first the semi-automatic versionM530, then the fully automatic versionA550and started in 2014 the development of the manual versionM380– mainly for the Chinese market – which we expect to start selling sometime in the first half of 2015. As part of the sectioning, the freezing microtome, cryostat, is used for fast biopsies when a patient needs a diagnosis immediately e.g. still being in the operational theater. This is a current development for MEDITE with first prototypes of theM630testing in the field, and we plan to start selling in the second half of 2015. Our goal for the cryostat is to offer a high quality device for a competitive price to win 20 to 30 % of the market (1,500 to 2,500 units annually).
When the sections of the tissue are transferred to a microscopy slide they undergo a staining process with several different protocols depending on the type of tissue. To manage high volumes, robotic multi-staining systems are used. MEDITE offers the most flexible system,TST44,which is computer controlled and can run several staining protocols simultaneously, and its unique feature software can even overtake slower with faster protocols. The maximum capacity is about 400 slides per hour with that system. For higher volume throughput, e.g. for cytology laboratories, MEDITE offers theCOT20linear staining system using a conveyor technology to realize a capacity of over 1,000 slides per hour.
Currently, the final step to the process is the stained microscope slide gets a cover over the tissue to preserve it for many years and make it ready for digital scanning or directly for diagnoses under the microscope by a pathologist. MEDITE therefore offers theRCM9000, the latest version of a stand-alone robotic coverslipper using glass coverslips. Another option MEDITE developed is theACS720glass coverslipper which can be connected directly to the TST44 multi-stainer creating a higher level of automation bridging the former manual step between two separate instruments. This instrument combination is very competitive and more and more public tenders are asking for it. Finally, to also support higher throughput laboratories, MEDITE developed the robotic coverslipperTWISTERin 2014 using a clear film instead of cover glass. This triples the capacity of a glass coverslipper up to 1,200 slides per hour. The prototypes of this new development are currently being tested in real laboratory environments and are expected to be available to sell an integrated familyin the near future.
Several smaller devices for stretching, drying, cooling, exhausting, recycling, printing etc. are also manufactured by MEDITE but not specifically described here. These products are usually competing mainly on price, but quality is still important.
In the segment of cost-effectivehistology consumables, MEDITE offers everything necessary to run its instruments and to run the complete histology lab. This includes embedding cassettes, microscope slides, paraffin, staining solutions, reagents and other products. Some of the consumable products are MEDITE developments and exclusively manufactured by or for us. Others products are MEDITE branded, but manufactured and delivered from external high quality vendors. The procurement focus therefore is on high quality, not lowest price.
Cytology
The product strategy of MEDITE in this market is to offer products for the detection and diagnosis of cancer under the trade name ofCytoCore Solutions.CytoCore Solutions products are intendedwhole process, from cell collection over processing to address sample collection, specimen preparation, specimen evaluation (including detection/screening and diagnosis), and patient monitoring within vertical markets related to specific cancers. CurrentCytoCore Solutions products are focused upon cervical and breast cancer. We expect that this focus will later be expanded to include other gynecological cancers as well as bladder, lung, oral and anal cancers, among others. Within each of these markets, we anticipate that theCytoCore Solutions products will be sold as individual value-added drop-in replacements for existing products and as integrated systems that improve the efficiency and effectiveness of clinical and laboratory operations.
Some of the collection systemprocessing histology instruments of MEDITE are also used in cytology labs, like the staining and coverslipping systems but, in addition others are specific for the detection of breast cancer totaled $10,000, or 42%, and $179,000, or 90% of total revenues in 2013 and 2012, respectively. License fee revenue totaled $14,000 or 58% in 2013 and $17,000, or 9% in 2012. Sales of ourSoftPaP® product accounted for revenue of $2,000, or 1%, of our revenue in 2012. There was no revenue from ourSoftPaP®in 2013.
The starting point in any clinical diagnostic test is the collection of a sample that contains the analyte of interest. To a very large extent, the characteristics of the sample collected determine the quality of the results of any tests performed on the sample. The sensitivity and/or accuracy of a test is, for example, likely to be reduced if the sample collection device or method does not capture a sufficient amount of the target analyte, alters the analyte of interest, or collects significant quantities of substances that interfere with the analysis. For this reason, the collection of samples from specific cells or tissues is one of our major focuses.
For collecting the cervical cells the former CytoCore developed theSoftPAPdevicefor the collection of cervical cell samples that are used in the detection of cervical dysplasia, cancer and human papillomavirus (“HPV”) infections. We believe thatSoftPAP,, which has been cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (‘FDA”) for sale in the United States, and which is CE Marked for international distribution, and is positioned as a premium value-added alternative to the spatula, broom and brush-style devices that have traditionally been used for these purposes. Unlike these traditional devices,SoftPAPcollects only exfoliated cells and does not scrape, cut or abrade the cervix. This unique sample collection method has been shown in clinical trials to reduce the frequency of false negative and false positive results when the sample is evaluated by cytological methods to detect the presence of dysplasia and cancer. A reduction in the false negative rate means that a greater percentage of patients who have cervical dysplasia, cancer or similar abnormalities are detected during cervical cancer screening (Pap testing) and can, therefore, be treated. A reduced false positive rate means that fewer patients are falsely identified as having cervical dysplasia or cancer, thus sparing these patients the unnecessary stress, discomfort and expense of the additional testing needed to verify that dysplasia or cancer is actually present. In addition, women have reported that having a cervical sample taken usingSoftPAPis more comfortable than when a traditional device is used. The presentSoftPAPconsists of a disposable collector and a reusable handle. A low costSoftPAP that combines the collector and handle into a completely disposable device and variants ofSoftPAP for the collection of exfoliated cell samples from tissues other than the cervix are being designed.
SoftKitis a low cost disposable device for the self collectionself-collection of a sample that can be evaluated to provide an assessment of the health of the entire female genital tract. WeHaving granted the priority US patent, we applied for the national patent in Germany, UK, China and India as well in 2014. For 2015, we are inplanning to finish the final stagesdesign of developingSoftKit for the collection of cellular samples that can be screened for a variety of gynecological cancers (including cervical, endometrial, and ovarian), and for the collection of gynecological samples to be tested for the presence of HPV and additional indications such as sexually transmitted disease (“STD”) testing. SoftKit addresses a number of market niches and segments that are not addressed effectively bySoftPAPor traditional gynecological sampling devices. We believe thatSoftKit complementsSoftPAP in theCytoCore Solutions family of products. SoftKit is designed to eliminate the need for assistance from a medical professional when collecting gynecological samples for many screening applications. We believe that this feature, in addition to the range of tests that can be performed on aSoftKit sample andSoftKit’s SoftKit’s low cost, makesSoftKit particularly attractive for use in large scale public health screening programs. We are also investigating the use ofSoftKit in an internet-based, fee-for-service testing program outside of the United States.Additional uses, such as providing a simple and rapid means of monitoring patients who have had an abnormal Pap test or who are undergoing treatment for a gynecological cancer, are also being explored.
Current methods for breast cancer screening primarily comprise manual palpitation of the breast and radiographic methods, including classical radiography and mammography. Regular manual self examinationself-examination is recommended for all women, and periodic breast cancer screening using radiography or mammography is recommended for all women over the age of 40. These methods, however, are widely recognized as not providing the sensitivity needed in order to detect small early stage lesions, and are adversely affected by the presence of high density breast tissue. The high error rates associated with the use of imaging modalities, such as mammography on women having dense breasts (dense breasts being common in women under the age of 40), has led to medical societies and health authorities recommending against the use of these imaging methods when screening a woman under the age of 40 for breast cancer. Since the early 1990’s, it has been known that nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) can be used as a sample in the assessment of a woman’s risk of developing breast cancer, and that this method is applicable to the screening of women who have dense breasts. WeIn our opinion, currently available collection devices for that application offerred by the competition lack either usability or market orientation and are much too expensive. The former CytoCore team started the development of the more market- and user-orientatedBreastPap device. After the acquisition of MEDITE, their engineering team took over the project and are presently developing an instrumentclose to finishing the prototype. The goal is to sell affordable electro-mechanical-devices to cytology labs which then can be forwarded to their gynecologist clients. The gynecologist offices then will offer this breast cancer risk assessment test to its female patients in the age of 20 and up at a rate of approximately $75. MEDITE will therefore offer the collection device, the consumable set (including hygienic barrier) and also the necessary cancer marker for the automated collection of NAF in a convenient and non-invasive manner and assays for the cytological evaluation of these samples.
Cervical cytology specimens are traditionally prepared as “smears” where the cells on the collecting device are literally wiped or smeared onto a microscope slide. In the mid-1990s, an alternative method, variously called a “monolayer” or “liquid-based” preparation (“LBP”), was introduced. In this method, cells are washed off of the collection device into a preservative solution to form a cell suspension. A portion of this cell suspension is then transferred to a microscope slide. LBPs presently account for about 80% of the cervical cytology slides prepared in the United States (“U.S.”), but despite the technical benefits of LBPs, only about 20% of the cervical cytology slides in the European Union and much lower percentages in the rest of the world are prepared in this manner. The primary limitations to greater adoption of LBPs outside of the United States are the high equipment and ancillary supply costs associated with the two predominant LBP methods.
Once a cytology specimen has been deposited onto a microscope slide, it is stained in order to assist the cytologist in detecting and identifying the various features of the deposited cells that are relevant to determining whether the cells are normal, dysplastic or cancerous. We are developing several proprietary stains for use in cervical cytology and other screening applications. These stains are designed for first evaluation using our automated slide imaging and analysis system, (see below), but some may also be evaluated visually or using a flow cytometer. A study has been initiated
Very important, as already mentioned in Germany to validate certain of these stains for use in cervical cytology as well as for use in other cytological assays.
When “reading” athe cytology specimen, a cytologist traditionally examines the specimen by eye through a conventional optical microscope to detect, classify, record, mark, and report abnormal cells. While performing this examination, the cytologist is also referring to the patient’s medical history, assessing specimen adequacy, and capturing a variety of metrics and other information needed for regulatory compliance and operational purposes. Despite the widespread deployment of computers in the laboratory, many of these operations are still largely paper-based. Even in laboratories where medical histories are available to the cytologists in electronic form and reports are prepared on a computer, it is not uncommon for the data, and sometimes even draft reports, to be initially captured on paper and then transcribed.
Over the last few years, the former CytoCore introducedteam developed the AcCell® computer-assisted cytology workstation. AcCell provided a means to assist the cytologist by automatically capturing the information relevant to screening cytology specimens in electronic form, managing the captured information, and automatically generating the necessary specimen, regulatory and operational reports. The benefitsprototype of this approach were demonstrated in several cytology laboratories where installationan imaging system for computer aided diagnosis of the AcCell system reduced operating costs, eliminated transcription errors, and reduced the time needed to generate a reportable result.
Although the evaluation of cervical cytology specimens by automated image analysis can be traced back to the 1940s and a number of capable systems have been developed, the FDA has not to date approved any automated image analysis system to “diagnose”, or classify as normal or abnormal, cervical cytology specimens without human intervention. The FDA has, however, approved several systems including the AccuMed (a corporate predecessor to CytoCore) TracCell™ for use in “mapping” or “location-guided screening”. In these systems, image analysis is used to identify potentially abnormal cells which are then presented to a cytologist for classification. This approach, which has been shown to reduce the time required to differentiate between normal and abnormal specimens, has been increasingly adopted by high volume laboratories, but is presently too expensive for most laboratories. We believe that our imager will be marketable at a price that will be affordable for most laboratories.
OurImager is a highly advanced version of the AccuMed TracCell location-guided cytology screening system that has been optimized for use with our proprietary stains and assays. As these stains and assays are designed to be more effective in highlighting the cellular abnormalities associated with cancer and precancerous conditions than the traditional Pap and thionin stains used in conjunction with other automated cytology screening instruments, our Imager is expected to deliver superior performance when used in cytological screening applications. OurImager
In 2014, with the increasingly deepening relationship to the Chinese partner UNIC, who is intendedspecialized and has developed digitalization systems for slides, we begun to workmerge both technologies together to shorten the time to market for this development.
Product Development and Research
With the acquisition of MEDITE and the startup of our Polish facility which includes the addition of eight electrical and design engineers, our 15 person engineering team’s goal is to shorten the development period and time to market for several ongoing and new R&D projects.
The formerbio molecular cancer markersresearch laboratory in conjunctiondowntown Chicago was relocated to the northern suburb of Chicago in 2014, resulting in significant cost savings including much lower facility rent and reduced salaries. The team of experienced researchers in biochemistry, with our Workstationsuccessful track records and a very high reputation in that segment, are working on revolutionizing the diagnosis of pre-cancerous conditions in cytology and histology. Several markers are already found and the related intellectual property is secured.
All other developments in particular related to engineering skills and capabilities were transferred to the MEDITE product development department, including the new team in Poland. One example is the BreastPap development which was originally ordered from an external developing company, but is now improved and continued in its development by the new Polish engineering team. Due to its purpose of collecting breast aspirate cells for breast cancer risk assessment, the project manager is a female design engineer. MEDITE’s product development department is including engineering skills and technology in software development, multilayer circuit board design, electrical design, 3-D product design in (using the highly professional CREO design software), technical regulatory documentation and quality management based on its ISO certificate.
The main focus of the developing team in 2014 was working on innovative and new products like the cryostat M630, the manual microtome M380, the film coverslipper TWISTER, a cytology processor, the BreastPap and several module developments, including an new control computer with updating related control interface boards, and a new X-Y-Z robotic movement technology for the multistainer and tissue processor, a new user interface standard for all instruments, and a new standard control unit with color touch screen for most smaller instruments
Markets and Marketing Objectives
As described also in other paragraphs of this report, our target is basically the worldwide cancer diagnostics market. Currently we serve in particular the histology and cytology segments of this total market but we are open to entering other cancer diagnostics segments in the future when attractive economically. The total annual market volume of histology and cytology is approximately $5.8 billion with annual growth rates between 10 and 30% depending on the detailed market, cancer segment and country.
Cancer is a major threat for mankind and the recently published “World Cancer Report 2014” by the World Health Organization, states that the number of cases will increase by about 57% to 22 million cases in the next two decades. At the same time cancer deaths will rise from 8.2 million to 13 million per year.
MEDITE’s current and future products will assist in the early diagnoses of cancer with superior sensitivity for detecting precancerous and cancerous conditions, and provide the basis for more efficient and cost effective treatment through superior specificity which eliminates unnecessary tests and treatment for benign conditions originally suspected as precancerous or cancerous. The net effect of utilizing MEDITE’s anatomic pathology (tissue based) and cytology (cell based) products will result in more lives saved at lower costs.
While distributing currently into approximately 70+ countries of the world, our sales and marketing efforts are in particular focused on the three major regions of USA, China and Europe.
Currently the target groups are the histology and cytology laboratories as end users. In some countries we sell directly to these laboratories, while in other countries we sell indirectly to them through our international distributors. Several of the products that we are currently developing may also be usedsold to national health programs and/or non-governmental public health agencies, or possibly directly to consumers. We use several means like sales and technical training, advertising materials, special offers etc. to motivate our distributors selling MEDITE products. Depending on local markets, the contact to public health care organizations or other public authorities responsible for purchasing medical product is important. While in conjunction withmany markets the laboratories directly can decide about purchases, in others they have to undergo a conventional review microscope. When a specimen slidetender process. Therefore it is evaluated by our Imager, the locations on the slide of any potentially abnormal cells are recordedimportant for MEDITE sales and marketing to a data file. The slide is then transmitted to aWorkstation where the data file guides the workstation to present each of the potentially abnormal cells detectedact adapted to the cytologist for classification.
Worldwide, approximately 180 million Pap and 60 million breast cancer screening tests are performed annually. The potential market for each of these tests amounts to approximately 1.5 to 1.8 billion women. Many studies have shown that between 70 and 80% of a person’s entire healthcare expenditures over their whole life occur in the last four to six months of life. As a result, more and more attention is being given to the early detection of a disease or condition. Bio-molecular screening, diagnostic, and treatment products consequently are being developed to detect disease states early so they can be dealt with before they become life threatening and expensive to treat. We are designing and developing its products to satisfy this paradigm shift and focus more on diagnostic methods and tools for early detection.
With the new products currently in late stages of Care for All Populations
For the cytology and histology laboratories, we usually have annual product catalogs with a wide overview of the related product lines. These are available in English, German and Polish languages and offered as export catalogs to our international distributors who translate them into the appropriate local languages. The female populationcatalogs are sent directly to the laboratories where we are selling directly.
The Company also uses advertisings in segment-specific journals like the “The Journal of Histotechnology” in the US or “Der Pathologe” or “Cyto-Info” in Germany to both offer specific products and to increase the overall brand recognition. Our international distributors usually do the same in their specific country.
MEDITE is also attending several local, national and international exhibition and congresses which are segment specific or medical product orientated like the NSH in the USA, the ECP in Europe, the Arab Health exhibition in Dubai and the Medica exhibition in Germany and many more.
Sales and Distribution
The Company is distributing its products to over 70 countries worldwide while focusing on the three major areas of USA, Europe and China.
Depending on their experience, strength in their local market and potential sales volume, MEDITE uses exclusive or non-exclusive distribution national contracts. Due to the fact that the three major competitors Leica, Thermo and Sakura are changing their distribution strategy more towards direct sales, several well established distributor contacted MEDITE to sell our products in the future instead.
In the USA, as it is currently our biggest market, sales and distribution is more diversified. MEDITE has managed to become an approved vendor for three of the largest hospital group purchasing groups, Premier, HealthTrust and Magnet, with a total of over 5,000 member hospitals and health care providers. The contract with Premier was successfully renewed in 2015, and with Magnet as well by the date of this report. About 98 % of health care providers are members of one or more group purchasing companies, and therefore it is very important in the US to be a registered vendor to realize sales with their members. Being a registered vendor means usually being just one out of two or three vendors in that segment for the member hospitals, and also being released from individual purchase contracts with each customer in using the general term of the hospital group purchasing organization. While in 2014 we have still not utilized the full potential of this distribution channel, we are working on realizing more in the future. A second distribution channel in the US is selling MEDITE products through other established sales organizations, utilizing their sales agreements with end users and through their sales representative network. This was increasingly an important part of the distribution network to grow sales in 2014, and will be in the future. The third distribution channel is direct sales using employed product specialist e.g. in cytology or even using our service employees for technical assistance, training, installation and sales. The channel of directs sales using the Company’s own employees or sales representatives is planned to be extended in the future.
In Europe, the Company is selling direct in Germany and Poland with employed regional sales representatives and through a network of independent distributors in all other countries. Some of these sales partners are working with MEDITE for more than a decade. MEDITE offers several dates each year for training of distributors sales and technical service employees for free to keep a high experience level for our products, and also to collect feedback information for product improvement and development.
For the Chinese market, MEDITE entered into a strategic distribution agreement with its local partner UNIC. The major shareholder and CEO is a professor of pathology and has established a wide network of sales teams in China and other Asian countries. With his help, the brand name MEDITE recognition already went up to the second place in the segment. MEDITE together with UNIC successfully got CFDA approval for all MEDITE histology instruments late 2014. Since then the UNIC team has been increasingly successful is selling MEDITE products in China with orders of over $500k as of the date of this report. The combined goal in China is to become the market leader in the histology and cytology market.
The rest of the world is approximately 3 billion,covered by an experienced team of which 2 billion fallsexport professionals at the German facility also acting as logistic center. Especially in the range where reproductive healthcare monitoringmedical area, a deep knowledge of customs, international regulatory restrictions, international payment terms and dangerous goods shipment regulations are major skills needed by these employees. MEDITE is necessaryapproved and effective. This group falls into two sub-groups: (1) femalesauthorized by the AEO to manage several customs issues directly.
In the US and in the United States and other countries where effective healthcare is available to most (estimated at between 300 and 400 million women), and (2) the remainder of the female world population, where healthcare is limited or non-existent. We believe our products can address the needs of both groups since the principal requirements for both groups – minimal cost, near point-of-care delivery, ease of use, and reduced reliance on highly-trained and skilled professionals - are the same. We are developing our initial products to serve the needs of femalesGermany MEDITE also sells its consumables in developed nations and economies,online shops from its local websites, but anticipate subsequent deployment of such products to less well-developed countries.
Government Regulation, Clinical Studies and Regulatory Strategy
The development, manufacture, sale, and distribution of medical devices are subject to extensive governmental regulation worldwide. In the United States, our products are regulated under the Medical Device Amendments to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the “FD&C Act”) and cannot be sold, shipped or promoted in interstate commerce without prior “clearance” or “approval” by the FDA. In the European Union (“EU”), medical devices are regulated under the Medical Device, In-Vitro Device and other Directives that require that each product be CE Marked to show that it conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable Directive(s) before it can be imported into or sold in the EU.
The regulatory systems in other major markets such as China and South America continue to undergo substantial changes and now in many respects resemble the system in the EU. In particular, the CE Mark is now accepted or required in essentially all significant markets other than the U.S. In addition to having to obtain the appropriate regulatory approvals, we are also required to register our products with the National Health Authority in any countrymany countries in which we expect to do business; may have our quality and manufacturing systems inspected and/or audited by representatives of various National Health Authorities; and may have to conform to additional regulations imposed by individual countries.
Under these regulations, we are subject to certain registration, record-keeping and reporting requirements. Our manufacturing facilities and those of our strategic partners, may be obligated to conform to specified quality standards, and are subject to audits and inspections. We are also subject to national, state and local laws relating to such matters as safe working conditions, manufacturing practices and environmental protection. Failure to comply with these regulations could have a material adverse effect on our future operations and may impose additional costs and risks.
In the U.S., the FD&C Act generally bars selling, advertising, promoting, or other marketing of medical devices that have not been authorized (approved or cleared) by the FDA. The promotion or sale of medical devices for non-approved or “off-label” uses is prohibited. The FDA also regulates the design and manufacture of medical devices. These regulations have been largely, but not completely, harmonized with the ISO quality system standards for medical devices that are used for similar purposes in most other countries. This incomplete harmonization requires us to maintain two separate, but equal quality systems and increases the cost and complexity of regulatory compliance. The FDA and the corresponding regulatory agencies in other countries may withdraw product clearances or approvals for failure to comply with these regulatory standards and may impose additional sanctions.
In the US most low to moderate risk medical devices that have legally marketed predicates receive “clearance” to market through a process described in Section 510(k) of the FD&C Act. In order to receive clearance under this so-called 510(k) process, a product must be shown to be “substantially equivalent” to an appropriate legally marketed “predicate device”. High risk devices and devices that do not have a predicate require “approval” via a Pre MarketPre-Market Approval (“PMA”) submission in which de-novo demonstration of the safety and efficacy must be established. Changes to a product, its intended use, and/or its labeling often require the submission of another 510(k) or PMA application. Obtaining approval to market via the PMA process takes substantially longer and is far more expensive than obtaining clearance to market via the 510(k) notification process.
The e2 Collector, which is the predecessor to theSoftPAP collector, was cleared for marketing by the FDA on May 31, 2002, and theSoftPAP collector received FDA clearance on January 31, 2008. Although most future Company products are expected to qualify for premarket clearance via the 510(k) process, some future products may require PMA approval.
In 2010, the FDA began a major review of the 510(k) process, which has to date resulted in the announcement of a number of changes including some that will directly impact our future products. Additional changes, some of which have the potential to substantially increase the time and cost involved in obtaining marketing clearance via the 510(k) process, are under consideration.
In the U.S., we are subject to various federal and state laws pertaining to healthcare fraud and abuse, including federal and state anti-kickback laws and the federal Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which make it illegal for an entity to solicit, offer, receive or pay remuneration or anything of value in exchange for, or to induce, the referral of business or the purchasing, leasing or ordering of any item or service paid for by Medicare, Medicaid or certain other federal healthcare programs. These statutes have been broadly defined to prohibit a wide array of practices, and our activities may subject us and our partners to scrutiny under such laws. Violations may be punishable by criminal and/or civil sanctions, including fines, as well as the exclusion from participation in government-funded healthcare programs. Laws pertaining to these and related matters also exist in other countries.
Each country has historically imposed its own unique regulations on medical products. In recent years, however, there has been a trend toward the harmonization of these regulations resulting in greater consistency between countries. This has resulted in a large and growing number of countries (over 70 as of this writing) adopting the CE Mark as a central element of their regulatory process for medical devices. The U.S. is the only major country that has not adopted the CE Mark. In order for a product to be CE Marked, the manufacturer must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the regulatory authorities that the product is safe and effective (conforms to the “Essential Requirements” for that class of product) and that it is manufactured in accordance with specified quality standards. In most countries the CE Mark is a pre-condition for medical device registration and in some places such as the EU, is mandatory in order for a product to be imported into or sold within the country or region. Failure to comply with the regulations pertaining to CE Marking can result in product seizures and other sanctions.
Although companyCompany registration to the ISO 13485 quality system standard is not required for companies selling Class I (lowest risk category) medical devices and products in the EU, such registration is for all practical purposes mandatory for companies selling products in Class II and higher. All CytoCore products that are presently being sold and a significant portion of those that are in development are currently classified as Class I devices. However, some of our upcoming products are expected to be in Class II or Class IIa and some changes that are being discussed in the EU may, if they come to pass, result in the reclassification of some of our Class I products into Class II. In eitherOur quality system is presently registered to ISO 9001 which is the parent standard of these cases weISO 13485. We presently expect that our quality system will be required to undergo the expensive and time consuming process of registrationregistered to ISO 13485 in order to be able to continue selling our products in many countries outside of the U.S.
The CE Mark for a product must be renewed every five years and will generally also require renewal if the requirements imposed by these Directives and standards change. This renewal increases the cost of regulatory compliance. In addition, the specific quality system requirements imposed upon a product are determined by the risk category into which the product is assigned by the applicable Directives. All of our current and planned products are presently considered to be low risk devices and are assigned to Class I which imposes the lowest level of quality system requirements. If a new Company product falls within or a current is reclassified into a higher risk category, we will be required to register our quality system to ISO 13485incur higher regulatory costs in order to maintain the CE Mark on the affected product(s). Our quality system presently conforms to the requirements of ISO 13485, but we have not been formally registered to this standard. Registering a quality system to ISO 13485 and maintaining this registration will substantially increase the costs of regulatory compliance.
The EU is in the process of determining whether the various Directives pertaining to medical devices should be “recast” to bring them into conformance with the recommendations of the Global Harmonization Taskforce (GHTF) and is also studying the possibility of replacing these Directives, which must be transposed into national laws by each country in order to become effective, with EU-wide laws that do not require transposition. Conversion from the present Directives to corresponding EU laws could be beneficial in that it is expected to eliminate country-specific differences in how the Directives are applied and enforced and therefore facilitate our compliance with the pertinent regulations in the EU. Harmonization of the current medical device classification system with that recommended by the GHTF may, however, result in some or all of our products being placed in more restrictive categories that could significantly increase our regulatory compliance costs and time to market.
The Global Harmonization Taskforce (GHTF), which is comprised of representatives from major medical device regulatory agencies such as the FDA, is in the process of developinghas developed a single unified medical device identification system that when it goes into effect, will be mandatory as it is implemented worldwide. In late 2013 the FDAThese regulations went into effect in many countries during 2014 and the corresponding regulatory agencieswill be going into effect in several other countries issued their final rules for the implementation of such a system. The EU and many additional countries are expected to issue similar regulations in 2014.over the next two years. We are well positioned to comply with these new regulations as we have both the company and product specific GS-1/GTIN codes as well as product specific GMDA and EDMAmandated under this regulation for our current products and have the mechanisms in place to obtain additional such codes and the registrations of the affected products in the future. The proposedIn a number of countries these regulations include user fees that will increase our cost of regulatory compliance.
We are also required to comply with certain environmental regulations with respect to products that are sold in the EU.various countries. One of these regulations is the Directive on Packaging and Packaging Wastes in the EU that: mandates the minimization of packaging; restricts the use of certain packaging materials; and imposes requirements, including possible “take-back” provisions, with respect to the recycling of packaging materials. All of our current products comply with the requirements of this Directive. At present, we comply with the recycling portions of this Directive by ensuring that all packaging materials are compatible with recycling programs that are in place in the EU. However, in the future we may be required to take a more active role in the recycling of certain types of products including possibly “taking back” and recycling laboratory instruments. Implementing a compliant take-back program will increase our operating and regulatory compliance costs.
In the EU electronic products, including clinical laboratory instruments such as the Imager and Workstation, are required to comply with two environmental Directives, one of which requires that the manufacturer “take back” and recycle the electronic portions of these instruments and the other (the so-called RoHS Directive) of which restricts the presence of certain materials in electronic products. We comply with the RoHS Directive by requiring our suppliers to use only RoHS complaint materials in the construction of our products. Upon commencement of instrument sales in the EU, if ever, we expect that we will be required to comply with the take-back requirements by contracting with an established electronic waste recycler in the EU. Such contracts will increase our operating costs.
The “REACH” regulation, which requires the registration of all chemical products produced in or imported into the EU is presently in its implementation phase. The long term impact of this extremely complex multi-level regulation on the Company is unknown at present, but is anticipated to be minimal in the near term as our sales of chemical products (stains, preservative, etc.) are and are expected to continue to be at less than the threshold levels for registration and reporting. An increase in sales of such products above currently forecast levels and/or a reduction in the applicable thresholds could potentially result in significant costs to us.
Data from clinical trials and studies is often required in regulatory submissions and is highly desirable for use in product marketing activities. In general, at least one trial or study is necessary for each new product and additional studies or trials are needed to support new or modified indications for use and new marketing claims.
Cost and Reimbursement
In the U.S., laboratory customers bill most insurers (including Medicare) for screening and diagnostic tests such as the Pap test. Insurers, such a private healthcare insurance or managed care payers, in addition to Medicare, reimburse for the testing, with a majority of these insurers using the annually-set Medicare reimbursement amounts as a benchmark in setting their reimbursement policies and rates. Other private payers do not follow the Medicare rates and may reimburse for only a portion of the testing or not at all. In addition, certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act are expected to significantly affect the reimbursements for many tests and diagnostic procedures. These changes are expected to be introduced over the next year or two. two Certain of the changes that have been proposed under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) would require that the cost effectiveness of novel new products be demonstrated in actual clinical use before CMS (the agency that manages Medicare) is allowed to provide reimbursement for such products. Historically, however, the medical community has generally been reluctant to adopt, or in some cases even to evaluate, novel products unless reimbursement is available. If these proposed ACA rules go into effect in their present form it is anticipated that the cost and time required to introduce a novel product into the US market will be substantially increased.
Outside of the U.S., healthcare providers and/or facilities are generally reimbursed through numerous payment systems designed by governmental agencies, such as the National Health Service in the United Kingdom, the Servicio Sanitaris Nazionale in Italy and the Spanish National Health System, as well as private insurance companies and managed care programs. The manner and level of reimbursement will depend on the procedures performed, the final diagnosis, the devices and/or drugs utilized, or any combination of these factors, with coverage and payment levels determined in the payer’s discretion.
Our ability to successfully commercialize theCytoCore Solutions System current and future products will depend, in part, on the extent to which coverage and reimbursement for such products will be available from third-party payers in the U.S. such as Medicare, Medicaid, health maintenance organizations and health insurers, and other public and private payers in foreign jurisdictions. The coverage policies and reimbursement levels of these third-party payers may impact the decisions of healthcare providers and facilities regarding which medical products they purchase and the prices they are willing to pay for those products. In some countries, our ability to commercialize products will also depend upon us becoming a qualified bidder on the tender offers issued by the National Healthcare Authority. IfWhen we succeed in bringing products to the market, we cannot be assured that third-party payers will pay for such products or establish and maintain price levels sufficient for realization of an appropriate return on our investment in product development. Additionally, we expect many payers to continue to explore cost-containment strategies (e.g., competitive bidding for clinical laboratory services within the Medicare program, so-called “pay-for-performance” programs implemented by various public and private payers, etc.) that could potentially impact coverage and/or payment levels for current or future CytoCoreMEDITE products.
Competition
Historically, competition in the healthcare industry has been characterized by the search for technological innovations and efforts to market such innovations. Technological advances have accelerated the pace of change in recent years. The cost of healthcare delivery has always been a significant factor in markets outside of the United States. In recent years, the U.S. market has also become much more cost conscious. We believe technological innovations incorporated into certain of our products offer cost-effective benefits that address this particular market opportunity.
MEDITE is currently focused upon histology and cytology which are the two major segments of the anatomic pathology market. Each of these segments is dominated by only 2 – 3 major players. In histology our own manufactured instrument line competes with those from Leica, Sakura and Thermo-Fisher while in cytology our current SureThin and SafePrep product lines compete with ours, or those thatproducts from the Cytyc Division of Hologic and the TriPath Division of Becton-Dickinson. Unlike certain of these competitors, MEDITE is a global one-stop supplier for all histology and cytology laboratories.
In histology our new patented fully automated system “Histo-Revolution” will become the only system worldwide which can provide a fully automated lab-in-one solution in histology. Due to our patent protection this technology isn’t replaceable until 2032 and no other company will be able to duplicate this.
In cytology we are developing. We believe the portion of our research and development efforts devoted to continued refinement and cost reduction of our products will permit us to remain or become competitive in the markets in which we presently distribute or intend to distribute our products.
We are several companies that produce automatedalso preparing the former CytoCore products Softkit, SoftPap and quantitative microscopy instruments. In the past, theBreastPap for market for these instruments has been primarily limited to research applications. However, asintroduction, CE marking and FDA and CFDA approval. As a result of recent advances in the area of molecular diagnostics, we believe the market for such instruments and applicationsimproved sample collection products will significantly increase over the next several years. We believe our instruments are the most versatile and cost-effective platforms available in the current market whether as an outright purchase or a fee-for-use application.
In general, we believe that our products must compete primarily on the basis of clinical performance, accuracy, functionality, reliability, quality, product features and effectiveness of the product in standard medical applications while being sufficiently versatile to support future applications. We also believe that cost control and cost effectiveness are additional key factors in achieving orand maintaining a competitive advantage. We focus a significant amount of product development effort on producing systems and tests that will not add to overall healthcare cost.
Operations
Our operations are several companies whose technologiesdivided in sales and marketing, research and development (including information technology), technical service, accounting and administration and manufacturing. The quality assurance is manage internally independent and authorized to act when necessary without a management agreement.
MEDITE instruments and certain other products are similar, adjunctivemanufactured in our factory in Burgdorf, Germany. Product manufacturing is monitored by Underwriters Laboratories (UL) while our quality system is periodically audited by TUV-Sud. Small lot manufacturing with Kanban flow control and ERP management is used to or may overlap with ours. Of these companies,ensure the timely delivery of our primary competitors are Rovers and Wallach in the area of cell collection devices and Cytyc and TriPath Imaging in specimen preparation and the automated morphological screening of these specimens. We believe that none of these companies offer a complete system comparable toCytoCore Solutions. In addition, both the Cytyc and TriPath systems are “closed” and are focused exclusively on the cervical cytology market whereas CytoCore offers an “open” system that is intended to addresssmaller instruments while minimizing our finished goods inventories. Larger instruments, most of which are customized to meet the 100+ types cytology testsunique requirements of their purchasers, are manufactured to order with a short turnaround. Extra safety stock is maintained for the few single source items that are currently performed. Indirect competitorsused in our products while qualified second sources are largely companies such as Qiagen and Greiner that offer HPV testsmaintained for all other critical items. All incoming purchased goods intended for resale, whether or not under the MEDITE brand name, or for use in cervical cancer screening. Our sample collection devices are suitable for use with these tests and our cytology products are adjunctive or complementary to them. Companies such as Ventana and Dako, which specialize in the preparation and evaluation of pathology, as opposed to cytology, specimens could potentially enter market segments of interest to CytoCore at some point in the future.
The sales and distribution department is organized into the two major departments of direct sales and export (distributors). For direct sales the goal for consumables and smaller instruments is to ship them within 24 hours after the receipt of the order. The export department is handling quotes, orders and shipments to almost every country worldwide. Every query should be answered within 24 hours. After receiving an order for larger equipment the manufacturing department informs the export department of the expected shipping date.
The MEDITE enterprise resource planning system is an integrated software package that handles sales, material management and production planning. It is also automatically connected to the accounting system, transferring customer and supplier invoices, payments and the material consumption as a just in time controlling tool.
Intellectual Property
We rely on a combination of patents, licenses, trade names, trademarks, know-how, proprietary technology, trade secrets and policies and procedures to protect our intellectual property. We consider such security and protection a very important aspect of the successful development and marketing of our products in the U.S. and foreign markets.
Patents, trademarks and copyrights are essential components in the United States,protection of our intellectual property worldwide. As we followmanufacture and sell products globally, we have designed our intellectual property strategy to provide the practicenecessary protection while containing and managing the associated costs. Two of the major components of this strategy are the aggressive filing of “provisional” patent applications in the US and of filing utility patent applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or similar entry points into national patent offices worldwide.
With the passage of the America Invents Act (AIA), the patent systems in all major countries now award patents on a provisional“first-to-file” basis that places a premium upon filing one or more patent application for an inventionapplications as soon as it has beenis determined that thean invention meets the minimum standards for patentability. WhileThis filing is in the form of a provisional“utility” application that meets all of the requirements for examination by a patent application doesoffice. The US, however, is unique in offering the opportunity to file “provisional” patent applications that, while not providebeing in form for examination and not providing any formal rights or protections, it does establish an official priorityis accepted by almost all countries as officially establishing the “priority” or invention date for the invention that carries over to any utility patent applications that are derived from it within one year of the date of the filing of the provisional application withinapplication. Provisional applications therefore provide a means of obtaining the next 12 months. Aearliest possible priority date while allowing time to refine and expand the scope of the invention and associated claims that are included in any resulting utility patent application begins the process that can culminate in the issuance of one or more U.S. or foreign patents. Weapplication. Our practice is to convert each outstandingof our provisional patent applicationapplications into some number of utility patent applications within this 12-month period. In most cases each provisional application results in one utility filing. However, in some cases a single provisional application has generatedcan generate two independentor more separate utility filings applications and/or multiple (up to five) provisional applications have beencan be consolidated into a single utility application. During the examination of a utility application, the examining patent office may require us to divide the application into two or more separate applications or we may file a continuation-in-part patent application that expands upon the technology disclosed in an earlier patent application and which has the potential of superseding or improving upon the disclosure of the earlier application. For these reasons, estimating the number of patents that are likely to be issued based upon the number of provisional and utility applications filed is difficult.
Prior to filing a utility application in the U.S., we review the application to determine whether obtaining patent coverage for the invention outside of the United States is necessary or desirable to support our business model. If so, a utility patent application is filed under thethrough a Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”). receiving office. This approach allows us to select the most appropriate receiving office to perform the initial patentability assessments while providing a single entry point into over 120 national patent offices worldwide. Depending upon the nature of the invention and business considerations, we typically nationalize PCT applications in some number of countries, the number depending upon anticipated market size and the locations of potential competitors.
We routinely prepare and seven have been abandoned as no longer being appropriateintend to our business. One Chinese patent had been issued and one European case has been abandoned. One U.S. and five foreign patent applications are filed and pending; in order to reduce the expenses related to patent prosecution, we are currently taking only those actions needed to keep them in effect. This group of patents and patent applications covers all aspects of theCytoCore Solutions System including, but not limited to, the point of service instrument, the personal and physicians’ collectors, and the slide-based test. We anticipate filing at least one PCT application during 2014 subject to obtaining funding. As a result of the acquisition of AccuMed, we acquired 33 issued U.S. patents, one U.S. patent application, and nine foreign patents, of which a combined total of 17 were transferred to a third party under a license agreement. Twenty-four additional foreign patent applications primarily covering the AcCell and AcCell Savant technology and related software were also acquired. We have recovered the 17 AcCell-related patents and patent applications from the third party. Two of the patients expire in late 2014 and early 2015. We do not consider these patients as relevant to our present business. The remaining patents expire between 2016 and 2020.
Patent applications filed prior to November 29, 2000 in the U.S. are maintained in secrecy until any resulting patents have issued. As there have been examples of U.S. patent applications that have remained “in prosecution” and, therefore, secret for decades, it is not possible to know with certainty that any U.S. patent that we may own, file for or have issued to us will not be pre-empted or impaired by patents filed before ours and that subsequently are issued to others. Utility patent applications filed in the United States after November 29, 2000 are published 18 months after the earliest applicable filing date. This revised standard reduces the chances that such a “submarine” patent will impair our intellectual property portfolio. Foreign patent applications are automatically published 18 months after filing. As the time required to prosecute a foreign utility patent application generally exceeds 18 months and the foreign patents use a “first to file” rather than a “first to invent” standard, we do not consider submarine patents to be a significant consideration in our patent protection outside of the United States.
Our products are or may be sold worldwide under trademarks and copyrights that we consider to be important to our business. We own the trademarksSoftPAP®,CytoCore®, relevant to these products andCytoCore Solutions®. We may file additional U.S. and foreign trademark and copyright applications in the future.
Our future technology acquisition efforts will be focused toward those technologies that have strong patent or trade secret protection.
We cannot be sure that patents or trademarks issued or which may be issued in the future will provide us with any significant competitive advantages. We cannot be sure any of our patent applications will be granted or that their validity or enforceability will not be successfully challenged. The cost of any patent-related litigation could be substantial even if we were to prevail. In addition, we cannot be sure that someone will not independently develop similar technologies or products, duplicate our technology or design around the patented aspects of our products. The protection provided by patents depends upon a variety of factors, which may severely limit the value of the patent protection, particularly in foreign countries. We intend to protect much of our core technology as trade secrets, either because patent protection is not possible or, in our opinion, would be less effective than maintaining secrecy. However, we cannot be sure that our efforts to maintain secrecy will be successful or that third parties will not be able to develop the technology independently.
Research and Development Expenditures
Our research and development efforts are focused on introducing new products as well as enhancing our existing product line. We utilize bothmainly in-house and contracted research and development personnel and in some cases external research and development services including in collaboration with universities, medical centers and other entities. All of ourOur research and development activities are presently conducted in the United States.
We believe research and development is critical to the success of our business strategy. Our research work in the area of chemical and biological components is expected to continue for the foreseeable future as we seek to refine the current process and add additional capabilities to our analysis procedure, including the detection of other forms of cancer and precursors to cancer.
The continuing development of new and update existing technology and consumables for histology and cytology to further increase our competitiveness we believe to spend a certain percentage of our revenue also in future years. With a further growing level of revenues we expect that percentage decreasing.
Components and Raw Materials
Most of the materials used in Company products are a key component of our business strategy. We designed theSoftPAP collection device using widely available and inexpensive silicone and plastic materials. These materials arereadily available from numerous sources and can be fabricated into finished devices by a variety of worldwide manufacturers based on our proprietary designs.
For paraffin the raw material is oil based and therefore the price is fluctuating depending on the raw material price. Therefore also our sales prices are flexible.
Some of the staining solutions reagents are depending on specific chemicals where the price also available fromis fluctuating. Usually we try to have a price fixed with our supplier for one year to cover that risk.
The availability of electronic and electrical parts for circuit board manufacturing is another issue we are closely monitor. For critical parts our suppliers give us a 12 month notice before discontinuing parts and, if necessary, we place a one-time order for a sufficient number of sources. Computers, cameras, automated slide-staining instrumentsthese parts to support the continued manufacture and automated slide-preparation instrumentssupport of all MEDITE products that use the part for the anticipated life of the MEDITE product. In addition we take advantage of the extended availability programs that are currently available from several large manufacturers.
Working Capital Practices
For further growth our need for working capital is expected to increase too. More revenue means an increase of inventory necessary to fulfill orders in time and also an increase of receivables. While the Company creates cash-flow from its operations, this is expected to be insufficient to finance the necessary increase of working capital.
The current level of working capital is partially financed by equity and working capital credit lines from the bank of the German subsidiaries. However, our credit lines have financed our U.S. operations and research and development efforts byonly very limited availability. In order for us to continue to grow the business, we plan on raising additional funds through borrowing and the sale of equity securities. We will continue to use these methods to fund our operations until such time as we are able to generate adequate revenues and profits from the sale of some or all of our products.
We believe that future sales of theCytoCore Solutions System or other products into foreign markets may result in collection periods that may be longer than those expected for domestic sales of these products. Our strategy will be to use down payments, letters of credit or other secured forms of payment, whenever possible,growth in sales of the existing and future MEDITE products in foreign markets.
Employees
As of March 27, 2013,December 31st, 2014, we employed a total of five full-time76 employees including 8 trainees and one part-time employee.7 part time employees which means 67 full-time-equivalent. None of our employees are members of a labor union. We also utilize independent consultants in the United States on an as-needed basis.
Financial Information Aboutabout Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales
Markets outside of North America are an important factor in our business strategy. Any business that operates on a worldwide basis and conducts its business in one or more local currencies is subject to the risk of fluctuations in the value of those currencies against the dollar, as well as foreign economic conditions. Such businesses are also subject to changing political climates, differences in culture and the local practices of doing business, as well as North American and foreign government actions such as export and import rules, tariffs, duties, embargoes and trade sanctions. We do not regard these risks, however, as a significant deterrent to our strategy to introduce ourCytoCore Solutions System MEDITE product lines to foreign markets in the future. AsOur current operations include payments and receivables in the three currencies of USD, EURO and Yen. For USD and Euro we begintry to marketnaturally hedge them by having revenues and sellexpenses in both currencies. Even in not handling other currencies directly the exchange rates to the USD and Euro might influence ourCytoCore Solutions System, we will closely review our foreign operational practices. cost and prices indirectly. We will attempt to adopt strategies to minimize the risks of changing economic and political conditions within foreign countries.
During the fiscal year ended December 31 2013,st, 2014, we did not have anyhad direct foreign operations.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
You should carefully consider the following risk factors that affect our business. Such risk factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those that are expressed or implied by forward-looking statements contained herein. Some of the risks described relate principally to our business and the industry in which we operate. Others relate principally to the securities market and ownership of our capital stock. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks are described elsewhere in this report under the Item 1 – Business, Item 3 – Legal Proceedings, and Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation sections, among others. Other risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently deem immaterial, also may become important factors that affect us. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks, and the trading price of our common stock could decline. The discussion of our risk factors should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included herein.
Risks Related to Our Business
We have a history of operating losses and thereThere isno guarantee of future profitability.profitability.
With the completion of the merger between MEDITE and our accumulated deficit at December 31, 2013 was approximately $102,800,000. We have sold onlythe former CytoCore, the operations of MEDITE are now burdened with the R&D and general administrative overhead of CytoCore, including the burden of now being a very limited amountSecurities and Exchange Commission registrant company. Future revenue growth and expense control will be dependent upon a number of factors, which may or which will be out of ourCytoCore Solutions System products to date and direct control. We therefore cannot be certain as to when, if ever, sales of our products might occur. Our future not withstanding the acquistion of Medite depends on obtaining new funding. As a result in connection with the acquisition of Medite, we are in process of completing our private placement for $2.5 million. The initial closing resulted in gross cash proceeds to us of $1.529 million. Additional funding for working capital may be necessary to support future sales growth and development of new products. There can be no assuranceguarantee that we will be able to secure necessary funds.
We currently depend onmay be unable to grow our business.
The Company has traditionally funded its operations in Germany through its income from operations and through working capital lines of credit with a local bank in Hannover. As of the saledate of a single product and product line.
Our future success will depend on our ability to develop new products and respond to technological changes in the markets in which we compete.
Our long-term ability to generate product-related revenue will depend, in part, on our ability to identify products and product candidatesideas that may utilize the different components of theCytoCore Solutions System, including our drug delivery system and slide-based tests. If internal efforts do not generate sufficient MEDITE product candidates, we will need to identify third parties that wish to collaborate with us to develop new products and applications.lines. Our ability to successfully pursue third-party relationships will depend in part oncontinue developing new and updating our abilityexisting product line is important to negotiate acceptable licensekeep and related agreements. Even if we are successful in establishing collaborative arrangements, they may never result in the successful development or commercialization of any product candidate or the generation of any sales or royalty revenues.
In addition, the markets for our products and services are characterized by rapid technological developments and innovations. Our success will depend in large part on our ability to correctly identify emerging trends, enhance capabilities, and develop and manufacture new products quickly, in a cost-effective manner, and at competitive prices. The development of new and enhanced products is a complex and costly process. We may need to make substantial capital expenditures and incur significant research and development costs to develop and introduce such new products and enhancements. Our choices for developing products may prove incorrect if customers do not adopt the products we develop or if the products ultimately prove to be medically or commercially unviable. Development schedules also may be adversely affected as the result of the discovery of performance problems. If we fail to timely develop and introduce competitive new products, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
The development, manufacture, sale and use of our products in the U.S. is subject to extensive regulation by the FDA as well as other governmental agencies at both the federal and state level. We must meet significant FDA requirements before we receive clearance or approval to market our products. Included in these FDA requirements may be the performance of lengthy and expensive clinical trials to prove the safety and efficacy of the products. We have limited experience in conducting and maintaining the preclinical and clinical trials necessary for regulatory approval, and face the risk that results in later trials may be inconsistent with results from earlier trials. A number of companies have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after promising early trial results.
Delays in receiving governmental approvals can be costly in terms of lost sales opportunities and increased clinical trial costs. The speed with which we complete such trials and receive approval will depend on several factors, many of which are beyond our control, including but not limited to, the rate of patient enrollment and retention, negative tests results, analysis of data obtained from testing activities and changes in regulatory policies. The FDA is in the early stages of a system level review that is widely expected to result in significant changes in the way that medical devices are regulated in the United States. Similarly, the European Union is in the later stages of revising the directivesDirectives that apply to the regulation of medical devices in the EU, and other countries, particularly in Asia and Latin America, are undertaking similar efforts.
Even if these trials are successfully completed, a clinical trial for theSoftPAP collector and received both FDA clearance and a CE Mark to market this device in the United States and the European Union. Future products will require additional clinical trials and filings for regulatory approval to market in the United States, European Union, and other jurisdictions. Wewe cannot be certain that the results of these future trials will result in regulatory approval to market these products will be granted, or that approval, if granted, will not be limited to specific indications for use or product claims. Obtaining regulatory approval is expensive, time-consuming and uncertain, and is expected to become even more so as a consequence of legislative and regulatory changes and initiatives that have recently been initiated in the United States, European Union and other jurisdictions.
Sales of medical devices and diagnostic tests outside the United States are subject to foreign regulatory requirements that vary from country to country. The time required to obtain regulatory clearance in a foreign country may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA marketing clearance. Export sales of certain devices that have not received FDA marketing clearance may be subject to regulations and permits, which may restrict our ability to export the products to foreign markets. If we are unable to obtain FDA clearance for our products, we may need to seek foreign manufacturing agreements to be able to produce and deliver our products to foreign markets. We cannot be certain that we will be able to secure such foreign manufacturing agreements on acceptable terms, if at all.
Once a product gains regulatory approval, whether in the United States or abroad, the product remains subject to regulatory requirements, including the monitoring of the performance of the product and the reporting of any adverse event reporting.events that may occur to the pertinent regulatory authorities. Failure to comply with post-approval requirements can, among other things, result in warning letters, recalls, fines, injunctions and suspensions or revocations of marketing licenses. Any enforcement action, even if unsuccessful, would be time-consuming, expensive, and potentially damaging to our reputation.
Finally, we may be restricted or prohibited from marketing or manufacturing a product, even after obtaining product approval, if the regulatory criteria change or if any unknown problems arise with respect to the product, its use or manufacture.manufacture,. With the widespread use of any product or device, serious adverse events may occur. Any safety issues could cause us to suspend or cease marketing our approved products, possibly subject us to substantial liabilities, and adversely affect our ability to generate revenues.
| 18 |
Changes in third-party reimbursement may negatively affect us.
Widespread adoption and commercial acceptance of ourSoftPAPdevice and theCytoCore Solutions System product lines in the United States and other countries is, in part, dependent upon the ability of healthcare providers and laboratories to secure adequate reimbursement from third-party payers such as private insurance plans, managed care organizations, Medicare and Medicaid, and foreign governmental healthcare agencies. We cannot guarantee that third parties will add our products to the coverage and that reimbursement will in fact be provided, that it will continue to be available, or that reimbursement levels will be adequate to enable healthcare providers and laboratories in the United States and other countries to use our products instead of conventional methods or existing therapies.
Reimbursement and healthcare payment systems in international markets vary significantly by country and include both government-sponsored healthcare and private insurance. There can be no assurance that foreign third-party payers will provide or continue to provide coverage, which third-party reimbursement will be made available at adequate levels, if at all, for our products under any such foreign reimbursement system or that healthcare providers or clinical laboratories will use our products in lieu of other methods. We also will be required to secure adequate reimbursement for any new products we develop or acquire, and we may not be able to do so successfully.
Healthcare policy changes, including recently passed healthcare reform legislation, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Political, economic and regulatory influences are subjecting the healthcare industry to potential fundamental changes that could substantially affect our results of operations. Government and private sector initiatives to limit the growth of healthcare costs, including price regulation, competitive pricing, coverage and payment policies, comparative effectiveness of therapies, technology assessments and alternative payment models, are continuing in many countries where we do business, including the U.S. These changes are causing the marketplace to put increased emphasis on the delivery of more cost-effective treatments. Our strategic initiatives include measures to address this trend; however, there can be no assurance that any of our strategic measures will successfully address this trend.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010 were enacted into law in the U.S. in March 2010. As a U.S. headquartered company, this healthcare reform law will materially impact us. Certain provisions of the law will not be effective until 2014 and 2015 and there are many programs and requirements for which the details have not yet been fully established or consequences not fully understood. However, on June 28, 2012, the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the law's mandate requiring individuals to purchase health insurance but rejected specific provisions that would have penalized states that did not expand their current Medicaid programs. As a result of this ruling and other factors, we expect implementation of most of the major provisions of the law to continue. As currently enacted, the law imposes on medical device manufacturers a 2.3 percent excise tax on gross U.S. sales of Class I, II and III medical devices beginning in 2013. U.S. net sales represented approximately 50 percent of our worldwide net sales in 2012 and, therefore, thisThis tax burden may have a material, negative impact on our results of operations and our cash flows. Other provisions of this law as currently enacted, including comparative effectiveness research, an independent payment advisory board, and pilot programs to evaluate alternative payment methodologies, could meaningfully change the way healthcare is developed and delivered, and may adversely affect our business and results of operations. Further, we cannot predict what healthcare programs and regulations will be ultimately implemented at the federal or state level, or the effect of any future legislation or regulation in the U.S. or internationally. However, any changes that lower reimbursements for our products, reduce medical procedure volumes or increase cost containment pressures on us or other participants in the healthcare industry could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our international operations will expose us to additional risks.
We expect that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of our future revenues in and believe international sales areit is a key element to our future success. As a result, we may be subject to the risks of doing business internationally, including:
| · | imposition of tariffs or embargoes; |
| · | trade barriers and disputes; |
| · | regulations related to customs and export/import matters; |
| · | fluctuations in foreign economies and currency exchange rates; |
| · | longer payment cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable; |
| · | the complexity and necessity of using foreign representatives and consultants; |
| · | tax uncertainties and unanticipated tax costs due to foreign taxing regimes; |
| · | the difficulty of managing and operating an enterprise spanning several countries, including difficulties in maintaining effective communications with employees and customers due to distance, language and cultural barriers; |
| · | the uncertainty of protection for intellectual property rights and differing legal systems generally; |
| · | compliance with a variety of laws; and |
| · | economic and geopolitical developments and conditions, including international hostilities, armed conflicts, acts of terrorism and governmental reactions, inflation, trade relationships and military and political alliances. |
The integration of Medite into our Company following the closing of thefuture acquisition may present challenges and impair our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition.
It might be possible to manage future acquisition to further increase the competitiveness of MEDITE. This may face significant challenges in combining Medite’s operations into our operations in a timely manner. The failure to successfully integrate Meditefuture acquisitions into our company and to successfully manage the challenges presented by the integration process may result in us not achieving the anticipated benefits of the acquisition of Medite including operation and financial synergies of the acquisition which may have the effect of depressing the market price of our common stock.
We compete in the highly competitive medical device and diagnostics marketplace and have several U.S. and foreign competitors, both publicly-traded and privately-held. Most of these companies have substantially greater financial, technical and research and development resources, established sales and marketing organizations and distribution networks, greater name recognition and longer-standing relationships with customers. Competitors with greater financial resources can be more aggressive in marketing campaigns, can survive sustained price reductions in order to gain market share, and can devote greater resources to support existing products and develop new products. Any period of sustained price reductions for our products would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. We may not be able to compete successfully in the future and competitive pressures may result in price reductions, loss of market share or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
It is also possible that competing products will emerge that may be superior in quality, effectiveness and performance and/or less expensive than our products, or that similar technologies may render our products obsolete or uncompetitive and prevent us from achieving or sustaining profitable operations. In addition, many of our competitors have significantly greater experience in conducting preclinical testing and clinical trials of products and obtaining regulatory approvals to market such products. Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in obtaining FDA approval for products more rapidly, which may give them an advantage in achieving market acceptance of their products.
We may not be able to market our products.
Our success and growth depend on the market acceptance of theSoftPAP collection deviceour existing and theCytoCoreSolutions System.future products. We do not intend to maintain and increase a direct sales force to marketcertain markets and sell our products.products but also depend on third party sales structures like distributors in many countries. Therefore, in order to successfully market and sell our products, we must be able to negotiate profitable distribution, marketing and sales agreements with organizations that have direct sales forces calling on domestic and foreign market participants that may use our products. We would not have the ability to control any such third party distributors and such third parties may focus resources on other products that generate larger fees or commissionsprofit contribution for them. If we are not able to negotiate such agreements on terms acceptable to us, if at all, we may be forced to market our products through our own sales force. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in developing and training such a sales force, should one be required, or that we will have the financial resources to carry out such development and training.
The accuracy, performance and cost of our products are critical to our business and reputation.
Due in part to increased competitive pressures in the healthcare industry to reduce costs, our ability to gain market acceptance of our products will depend, among other things, on our ability to keep product costs low and/or demonstrate that any increased cost of using our products is offset by the increased accuracy and performance achieved by using them. In particular, we need to convince healthcare providers, insurance companies and other third-party payers, as well as clinical laboratories, of the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of our products.
Occasionally, some of our products may have quality issues resulting from the design or manufacture of the product or, in the case of the platform, the hardware and software used in the product. Often these issues can be discovered prior to shipment and may result in shipping delays or even cancellation of orders by customers. Other times problems could be discovered after the products have shipped, which would require us to resolve issues in a manner that is timely and least disruptive to our customers. Such pre-shipment and post-shipment problems would have ramifications for us, including cancellation of orders, product returns, increased costs associated with product repair or replacement, and a negative impact on our goodwill and reputation.
We may be subject to product liability actions.
In addition, the sale and use of our products entail a risk of product failure, product liability or other claims. Coverage is confirmed by an insurance company up to $5milion, becoming increasingly expensive, and we may not be able to obtain adequate coverage at an acceptable cost in the future.future or the coverage may not be sufficient. Any product liability claims and related litigation would likely be time-consuming and expensive, may not be adequately covered by our insurance coverage, and may delay or terminate research and development efforts, regulatory approvals and commercialization activities.
| 20 |
We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property.
Our success in large part depends on our ability to maintain the proprietary nature of our technologies, trade secrets and other proprietary information. To protect our intellectual property and proprietary information, we rely primarily on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as internal procedures and contractual provisions. We hold a variety of patents and trademarks and have applied for a number of additional patents and trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and foreign patent authorities. We intend to file additional patent and trademark applications as dictated by our research and development projects and business interests. We cannot be certain that any of the currently pending patent or trademark applications, or any of those which may be filed in the future, will be granted or that they will provide any meaningful protection for our products or technologies or any competitive advantage. In order to provide protection, patents and trademarks must be enforced, which is costly and time-consuming, and trade secret and copyright laws afford only limited protection. In addition, the laws and enforcement mechanisms of some foreign countries may not offer the same level of protection as do the laws of the United States. Legal protections of our rights may be ineffective in such countries, and technologies developed in such countries may not be protected in jurisdictions where protection is ordinarily available. Our inability to protect our intellectual property both in the United States and abroad would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We protect much of our core technology as trade secrets because our management believes that patent protection would not be possible or would be less effective than maintaining secrecy, and we have in place certain internal procedures and contractual provisions designed to maintain such secrecy. Despite our efforts to safeguard and maintain our proprietary rights, we may not be successful in doing so. The steps taken by us may be inadequate to deter unauthorized parties from misappropriating our technologies or prevent them from obtaining and using our proprietary information, products and technologies. Moreover, our competitors may independently develop similar technologies or design around patents issued to us.
If we fail to protect, defend and maintain the intellectual property rights associated with our products or if we are subject to a third-party claim of infringement, the competitive position of our products could be impaired. We may be required to obtain licenses from third parties to avoid infringing third-party patents or other proprietary rights, yet there can be no assurance that such licenses would be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to obtain required third-party licenses, we may be delayed in or prohibited from developing, manufacturing or selling products that require such licenses. In addition, infringement, interference and other intellectual property claims and proceedings, with or without merit, are expensive and time-consuming to litigate, divert resources, and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We may not be able to maintain effective product distribution channels.
We currently rely primarily on third-party distributors for the sale and distribution of our products.products in most countries. Our relationships with these distributors, therefore, must remain positive. We have a limited agood history of working with these companies andbut have only limited control over their performance. We cannot predict the success of these relationships or the efforts of these companies in marketing theSoftPAP and our other products. MEDITE product line. Our sales and marketing efforts, including those of our distributors, may not be sufficient to successfully compete against more extensive and well-funded operations of certain of our competitors. Only two of our existing distributors purchased any product from us in 2013 and 2012. There were no sales in 2011. In addition, we must manage sales and marketing personnel in numerous countries around the world with the concomitant difficulties in maintaining effective communications due to distance, language and cultural barriers.
A significant portion of our revenues are attributable to the sale of products on behalf of a third-party.
We anticipate substantial fluctuations in our future operating results. A number of factors contribute to such fluctuations, including but not limited to:
| · | introduction and market acceptance of new products and product enhancements by both us and our competitors; |
| · | timing and execution of distribution and sale contracts; |
| · | competitive conditions in the medical device and diagnostic markets; |
| · | product development, sales and marketing expenses; |
| · | third-party reimbursement levels; and |
| · | changes in general economic conditions. |
The loss of existing key management and technical personnel or the inability to attract new hires could have a detrimental effect on us..
Our success depends on identifying, hiring, training, and retaining qualified professionals. Competition for qualified employees in our industry is intense and we expect this to remain so for the foreseeable future. Currently, our limited resources make it difficult for us to competitively compensate our current employees and potential employee candidates. If we were unable to attract and hire a sufficient number of employees, or if a significant number of our current employees or any of our senior managers resign, we may be unable to complete or maintain existing projects or develop and implement new projects of similar scope and revenue. Our success is particularly dependent on the retention of existing management and technical personnel, including Michaela Ott, Chief Executive Officer, Robert F. McCullough, Jr., our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, andMichael E. Ott, Chief Operating Officer, Richard A. Domanik, Ph.D., our Chief Operating Officer. We do not have an employment with either of our executive officers and do no maintain aMichael Jolley, Ph.D, both key man life insurance policy on any of our executive officers.researcher. The loss or unavailability of the services of these executives could impede our ability to effectively manage our operations.
We may not be able to get a written settlement on the legal proceeding with D&D Technology and may need to continue defending that case
We have a litigation case with D&D Technology, Inc., Union, NJ, about third party development costs. As of the filing this case is verbally settled with a final payment of $15,000 by MEDITE to D&D Technology, the written settlement is pending. While both parties’ attorneys verbally agreed on this settlement there is a risk that the final written settlement will not be executed and we need to continue to defend the case which would result in additional attorney fees, higher settlement amount and additional court expenses.
We have an on-going lawsuit with Hologic Deutschland GmbH (Germany)
On August 2013, the German local state court ruled the Company was not in breach of claims pursued by plantiff, Hologic Deutschland GmbH, Germany. However, the court ruled the Company must clearly differentiate their products in the German market from those offered by Hologic or be subject to court imposed penalties with a limit of $304,000. Hologic has appealed the verdict and in addition the Company has appealed the provision of the verdict which applies to the possible penalty as described.
We may need to expand our operations and we may not effectively manage any future growth.
As of December 31, 2013,2014, we employed five full-time persons and one part time person.76 persons. In the event our products and services obtain greater market acceptance, we may be required to expand our management team and hire and train additional technical and skilled personnel. We may need to scale up our operations in order to service our customers, which may strain our resources, and we may be unable to manage our growth effectively. If our systems, procedures, and controls are inadequate to support our operations, growth could be delayed or halted, and we could lose our opportunity to gain significant market share. In order to achieve and manage growth effectively, we must continue to improve and expand our operational and financial management capabilities. Any inability to manage growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Trading in our common stock has been limited, there is no significant trading market for our common stock, and purchasers of our common stock may be unable to sell their shares.
Our common stock is currently eligible for quotation on the OTCQB - the middle tier of the three marketplaces for trading over-the-counter stocks provided and operated by the OTC Bulletin Board (the “OTCBB”),Markets Group - however trading to date has been limited. If activity in the market for shares of our common stock does not increase, purchasers of our shares may find it difficult to sell their shares. We currently domay not meet the initial listing criteria for any registered securities exchange. The OTCBBOTCQB is a less recognized market than the foregoing exchanges and is often characterized by low trading volume and significant price fluctuations. These and other factors may further impair our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares when they want to and/or could depress our stock price. As a result, stockholders may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations of the price of, our securities because smaller quantities of shares could be bought and sold, transactions could be delayed and security analyst and news coverage of our Company may be limited. These factors could result in lower prices and larger spreads in the bid and ask prices for our shares of common stock.
The historically volatile market price of our common stock may affect the value of our stockholders’ investments.
The market price of our common stock has in the past been highly volatile. In fiscal years 20132014 and 2012,2013, the price of our common stock traded in a range of $0.01$0.50 to $0.06$10.00 per share.share (adjusted by the 1:100 reverse split). This volatility is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. Factors affecting potential volatility include:
| · | announcements of new products or technology by us or our competitors; |
| · | announcements of the FDA relating to products and product approvals; |
| · | announcements of private or public sales of securities; |
| · | ability to finance our operations; |
| · | announcements of mergers, acquisitions, licenses and strategic agreements; |
| · | fluctuations in operating results;and |
| · | general economic and other external market factors. |
In addition, the occurrence of any of the risks described in this Risk Factors section could have a material adverse impact on the price of our common stock.
We have never been paid dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.
We have never declared or paid a cash dividend or distribution on our common stock and we do not anticipate doing so for the foreseeable future. Our ability to declare dividends on our common stock is further limited by the terms of certain of our other securities, including several series of our preferred stock. We intend to reinvest any funds that might otherwise be available for the payment of dividends in the further development of our business. Accordingly, investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our shares.
There are currently outstanding a substantial number of securities convertible into shares of our common stock and we intend to raise additional funds in the future through issuances of shares of common stock or securities convertible into shares of our common stock, which will be dilutive to existing stockholders or impose operational restrictions.
We are authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. As of December 31, 2013,2014, we had: 47,250 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock outstanding, which convert into approximately 2,06421 shares of our common stock; 93,750 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock outstanding, which convert into approximately 37,500375 shares of our common stock; 38,333 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock outstanding, which convert into approximately 19,167192 shares of our common stock; 175,000 shares of Series D convertible preferred stock outstanding, which convert into approximately 175,0001750 shares of our common stock; and 19,022 shares of Series E convertible preferred stock outstanding, which convert into approximately 52,311524 shares of our common stock. There are cumulative dividends due on the Series B, Series C, Series D, and Series E convertible preferred stock, which may be paid in kind in shares of our common stock. Our Certificate of Incorporation permits our Board of Directors to issue the remaining 5,143,137 undesignated shares of preferred stock with such voting rights, if any, designations, rights, preferences and limitations as the Board may determine. At December 31, 2013,2014, we had outstanding warrants to purchase an aggregate 39,00058,515 shares of our common stock. The issuance of shares of our common stock upon the conversion of our preferred stock, or upon exercise of outstanding warrants, would cause dilution of existing stockholders’ percentage ownership of the Company. In addition, in connection with our acquisition of Medite,MEDITE, we issued 1.469 billion14.68 million shares of our common stock to the stockholders of Medite.MEDITE. Holders of our preferred and common stocks do not have preemptive rights, meaning thatcurrent stockholders do not have the right to purchase any new shares in order to maintain their proportionate ownership in the Company. Such stock issuances and the resulting dilution could also adversely affect the price of our common stock.
In addition, we intend to raise additional capital in the future to fund our operations through sales of shares of our common stock or securities convertible into shares of our common stock, as well as issuances of debt. Such additional financing will be dilutive to our stockholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants which may limit our operating flexibility. If additional capital is raised through the issuances of shares of our common stock or securities convertible into shares of our common stock, the percentage ownership of existing stockholders will be reduced. These stockholders may experience additional dilution in net book value per share and any additional equity securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock.
Applicable SEC rules governing the trading of “penny stocks” may limit the trading and liquidity of our common stock which may affect the trading price of our common stock.
Our common stock is a “penny stock” as defined under Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act, and is, therefore, subject to SEC rules and regulations that impose limitations upon the manner in which our common stock can be publicly traded. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a per share price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on some national securities exchanges). The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer’s presumed control over the market, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. In addition, broker-dealers who sell these securities to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors” must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. Consequently, these requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity, if any, of our common stock and reducing the liquidity of an investment in our common stock.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law may make a contested takeover of us more difficult.
Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware ("DGCL") could deter a change in our management or render more difficult an attempt to obtain control of us, even if such a proposal is favored by a majority of our stockholders. For example, we are subject to the provisions of the DGCL that prohibit a public Delaware corporation from engaging in a broad range of business combinations with a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns 15% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting shares (an "interested stockholder") for three years after the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. Our certificate of incorporation also includes undesignated preferred stock, which may enable our board of directors to discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a tender offer, proxy contest, merger or otherwise. Finally, w
Properties |
We occupy approximately 1,840a total of 68,208 square feet of property of which 24,324 is leased space. The owned building at the address Wollenweberstrasse 12, 31303 Burgdorf, Germany has a size of 43,884 square feet. In addition we use a leased neighborhood building with an additional 11,302 square feet in space for manufacturing. This contract has a three month termination term. The headquarter facility at 414 N. Orleans St.the address 4203 SW 34thStreet, Orlando, FL 32811, USA with a space of 5,520 square feet is leased until July 31st, Suite 503, Chicago, Illinois 60654, under a Three-year lease that expires in October 2016. This space houses our executive offices,2018 and the research laboratory facility at address Unit 306, 888 E. Belvidere Road, Gryslake, IL 60030, USA with a space of 1,904 square feet is leased until June 30th, 2016. The facility in Poland for R&D and engineering development facilities.some manufacturing has a size of 5,597 square feet at the address of ul. Zabia 2, 65-158 Zielona Gora, Poland and while lease contract is ending August 2017 we are able to use a three month termination term too. We consider our facilities to be well utilized, well maintained, and in good operating condition. Further, we consider the facilities to be suitable for their intended purposes and to have capacities adequate to meet current and projected needs for our operations.
The terms of our current facilities leases vary from 3 months’ notice for part of the German and 6 month notice for the Poland facility to a term agreement until June 30, 2015 for the laboratory facility in the Chicago area and until July 31, 2018 for the Orlando facility. The monthly rent for the Orlando facility will increase from currently $2,345 to $ 2,563 per month in the last year. The previous down town Chicago facility lease contract term is October 30, 2016 with a monthly lease of $4,270. This facility currently is subleased at $3,816 per month.
Legal Proceedings |
We have a litigation case with D&D Technology, Inc., Union, NJ, about third party development costs. As of the filing this case is verbally settled with a final payment of $15,000 by MEDITE to D&D Technology, the written settlement is pending. All expected liabilities are accrued in our financial statement.
On August 2013, the German local state court ruled the Company was not in breach of claims pursued by plantiff, Hologic Deutschland GmbH, Germany. However, the court ruled the Company must clearly differentiate their products in the German market from those offered by Hologic or be subject to court imposed penalties with a limit of $304,000. Hologic has appealed the verdict and in addition the Company has appealed the provision of the verdict which applies to the possible penalty as described.
Mine Safety Disclosures |
Not Applicable.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Market Information
Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “CYOE”“MDIT”. The following table lists the high and low bid information for our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported on the OTCBB.OTCQB. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, may not include retail mark-ups, mark-downs, or commissions, and may not reflect actual transactions.
| 24 |
| High | Low | ||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | |||||||
| 1st Quarter | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.01 | |||
| 2nd Quarter | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.01 | |||
| 3rd Quarter | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.01 | |||
| 4th Quarter | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.01 | |||
| Year Ended December 31, 2012 | |||||||
| 1st Quarter | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.01 | |||
| 2nd Quarter | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.01 | |||
| 3rd Quarter | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.01 | |||
| 4th Quarter | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.02 |
| High | Low | |||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2014 | ||||||||
| 1st Quarter | $ | 10.00 | $ | 1.01 | ||||
| 2nd Quarter | $ | 3.75 | $ | 1.90 | ||||
| 3rd Quarter | $ | 3.10 | $ | 0.52 | ||||
| 4th Quarter | $ | 9.00 | $ | 1.50 | ||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2013 | ||||||||
| 1st Quarter | $ | 2.60 | $ | 0.54 | ||||
| 2nd Quarter | $ | 2.50 | $ | 1.10 | ||||
| 3rd Quarter | $ | 2.00 | $ | 0.50 | ||||
| 4th Quarter | $ | 2.00 | $ | 1.00 | ||||
Holders
As of April 8, 2014,May 6, 2015, we had approximately 413440 record holders of shares of our common stock.
Dividends
We have not paid a cash dividend on shares of our common stock, and our Board of Directors is not contemplating paying dividends at any time in the foreseeable future. The terms of certain of our securities, including our Series B, C, D and E preferred stock, prohibit us from declaring any dividends on our common stock (or any other stock junior to such security) except for dividends payable in shares of stock of the Company of any class junior to such security, or redeem or purchase or permit any subsidiary to purchase any shares of common stock or such junior stock, or make any distributions of cash or property among the holders of the common stock or any junior stock by the reduction of capital stock or otherwise, if any dividends on the security are then in arrears.
We have a contingent obligation to pay cumulative dividends on various series of our convertible preferred stock in the aggregate amount of approximately $ 1,890,251 at December 31, 2014, $ 1,763,395 at December 31, 2013, which we intend to pay through the issuance of shares of our common stock, if and when the holders of the preferred shares elect to convert their shares into common stock.
Stock Transfer Agent
Our stock transfer agent is Computershare Shareowner Services, 199 Water Street, 26th Floor, New York, New York, 10038 and its telephone number is (212) 805-7100.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Companyformer CytoCore issued an aggregate of 15,000,000150,000 shares of restricted, unregistered common stock to qualified investors for $300,000, or $0.02$2.00 per share
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Companyformer CytoCore issued to two of the Company’sits directors, Mauro Scimia (“Scimia”) and Xavier Carbonell (“Carbonell”), 902,7649,028 and 1,805,52818,055 shares of restricted, unregistered common stock, respectively, for consulting services rendered, and the Company recorded a charge of $52,500, or $0.02$2.00 per share, as a selling, general and administrative expense.
The Companyformer CytoCore during the year ended December 31, 2013, also issued 2,346,14823,461 shares of restricted, unregistered common stock to a consultant for services rendered, and recorded $36,000 as a selling, general and administrative expense.
During the year ended December, 2013, Robert McCullough, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, converted $3,250,000 of debt owed to him into 162,500,0001,625,000 shares of restricted, unregistered common stock at a price of $0.02$2.00 per share. As a result of this transaction, Mr. McCullough beneficially owns 167,690,706 shares of common stock which is 61.99% of our outstanding common stock.
In addition, the Companyformer CytoCore issued to two current independent directors, Alexander Milley and Dr. John Abeles, an aggregate 7,500,00075,000 shares of restricted, unregistered common stock, respectively, for past directors fees totaling $150,000, or $0.02$2.00 per share. Also, the Company recorded the payment of $50,000 for services rendered to a former director in the form of 2,500,00025,000 shares of restricted, unregistered common stock valued at $0.02$2.00 per share. These shares have not yet been issued.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Companyformer CytoCore issued to Augusto Ocana (“Ocana”), a director and vice president of the Company, 1,805,52818,055 shares of restricted, unregistered common stock, for services rendered. The Companyformer CytoCore recorded a charge of $35,000, or $0.02$2.00 per share, as a selling, general and administrative expense.
During 2014, the company issued 1,259,625 shares for $2,024,400 in equity proceeds emanating from the sale of unregistered stock associated with two private placements (PIPE) “Private Placement in Public Entity” at $1.60 per share.
During 2015, the company issued 240,625 shares at $1.60 for proceeds of $385,000.
The Company owes Ventana Systems approximately $21,000 under a 2001 promissory note in the original principal amount of approximately $62,000. The note matured in 2003 and has been in default since then. On February 23. 2015, Ventana Medical Systems agreed to convert the Series “D” Preferred Stock, Stated and Liquidation value, $525,000 and accrued dividends of $660,000 into 12,100 shares of the Company’s unregistered common stock. In addition, the Company agreed to pay Ventana Medical Systems remaining outstanding principle and interest of $38,281 for a note dated November 30, 2003 currently in default.
We issued the foregoing securities in reliance on the safe harbor and exemptions from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for sales to a limited number of accredited investors, employees, service providers, or creditors with whom we had prior relationships, without engaging in any general solicitation, and without payment of underwriter discounts or commissions to any person.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
| Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
Not applicable
| Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”, “we”, or “us”), formerly CytoCore, Inc., is a medical technology company specializing in the development, engineering, manufacturing and marketing of premium medical devices and consumables for detection, risk assessment and diagnosis of cancer and related diseases. Depending upon the type of cancer, segments within the current target market of approximately $5.8 billion are developing an integrated family of cost-effective productsgrowing at annual rates between 10 and 30%.
The year 2014 was a transitional year and very important for the detection, diagnosisCompany, with challenges, tremendous achievements and treatmentchanges for the Company. By acquiring MEDITE, the Company changed from just research operations to an operating company with 76 employees in three countries, a distribution network to about 70 countries worldwide, a well-known and established brand name, a wide range of cancer under the trade name ofCytoCore Solutions. CytoCore Solutions products are intended to address sample collection, specimen preparation, specimen evaluation (including detection/screening and diagnosis), treatment and patient monitoring within vertical markets related to specific cancers. CurrentCytoCore Solutions products are focused upon cervical cancer. We plan that this focus will later be expanded to include other gynecological cancers as well as bladder, lung, and breast cancers, among others. Within each of these markets, we anticipate that theCytoCore Solutions products will be sold as individual value-added drop-in replacements for existingselling products and as integrated systems that improve the efficiencyestablished infrastructure necessary for a company acting in the medical industry. Both company structures and effectivenesscultures were successfully merged to one new company organization.
Even during this transitional year, the Company was successfully growing by 10 % to revenues of clinical and laboratory operations.
Several synergies were realized with this advance has come asstrategy, e.g. a result of new knowledgecost reduction of the human genomeformer CytoCore research segment by about 50 %, complementary products in the cytology product segment in now addressing all components from cell collection through cell processing, to finally diagnostic tools like cancer markers and related proteins, which form the foundation of cell biology and the functioning of the human body. Our goal is to utilize this research as a base to develop screening and diagnostic testing products for cancer and cancer-related diseases. We believe that the successsystems. Some of these products are already selling and some are in a late stage of development expecting to sell within one or two years.
The cancer markers developed by the former CytoCore over the last three years are showing excellent results in internal studies. Clinical trials have not been started yet. In management’s opinion, one of the prognostic cancer markers has the ability to displace the current expensive HPV testing methods (e.g. from Roche) by offering a significantly higher specificity and sensitivity. It is not just indicating there is a risk of cancer because of the detection of an HPV virus. Instead it identifies the small fraction of HPV infections that are likely to progress to cancer. It is testing all cells and therefore is showing much better results. It even reduces the cost and disadvantages for the patient of false positive diagnosis. By bringing this promising product into the market, the Company already set a strategy which will improve patient care through more accurate test performance, widerbe a major goal for the next two years.
Another major goal achieved in 2014 was the market entrance into China, the fastest growing, and by 2016 we expect to be the largest, market for our products. With our Chinese distributor UNIC Medical, we successfully received China Food and Drug Administration (“CFDA”) approval for all MEDITE histology laboratory devices. The UNIC sales team now can sell MEDITE products in China and is successfully doing so already. By the date of this report, orders for over $500,000 from China have already been placed. Also, together with UNIC, we are part of a government supported project to standardize the histology laboratory process there using MEDITE equipment and consumables for the processing aspect of the process, CytoCore assays, and the UNIC technology for digitalization and computer aided diagnostics utilizing the latest cloud technology.
Several other innovative product availabilitydevelopments were brought closer to marketability in 2014. As of the date of this filing, the German priority patent for the fully automated histology lab, a Lab-In-One unit, has been granted. This technology is in demand within the market, following the trend toward higher automation in the industry and more cost-effective service delivery.has the ability change the competition in histology.
In the cytology segment, the SureThin product line revenue grew in Europe. To sell the complete set in the US, and therefore compete against Hologic’s products, a US Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) application is in the preparation process and is expected to be submitted soon. This would open a great opportunity to offer a much cheaper alternative to the existing market leading brand and to win market share of this $600m market.
Finally, several important formal achievements for the OTC listing were also realized in changing the Company’s name to MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics, Inc., using the worldwide established brand which better describes the Company’s focus. We have developed an FDA-cleared sample collection devicealso completed a 1:100 reverse split of our outstanding common stock which significantly reduced the amount of our outstanding shares of common stock and are developing and testing stains and reagents for use withalso had the AIPS system to screen for various cancers.
Outlook
Management believes that its current business will continue to requiregrow and to improve profitability and cash-flows because of new promising products, additional capital. As a result, we will incur substantial operating losses until we are able to successfully market some, or all, of our products.
In 2013 the daily average exchange rate from Euro to USD was approximately $1.328. In 2014 the rate was approximately $1.329. However, in 2015 through the date of the filing, the daily average rate has dropped to $1.112. Should that reduction continue throughout the year, our results USD will appear lower on a year over year basis as approximately 90% of our activity currently occurs in Euros.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Results of Operations
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20132014 as compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20122013 (Dollars in thousand)
Because our merger between the former CytoCore, Inc. and MEDITE Enterprise, Inc. was recorded for accounting purposes as a reverse merger, the historical financial statements of the Company became those of MEDITE Enterprise, Inc. All of the transaction history of the former CytoCore, Inc. prior to the merger is no longer included in the attached financial statements. Therefore certain items in the statement of operations are not directly comparable from 2013 to 2014 because they include the results of the former CytoCore, Inc. in 2014 but only the results of MEDITE Enterprise, Inc. are shown in the results for 2013.
Revenue
Total revenues of $24,000$10,983 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20132014 represented a decreasean increase of $174,000,$1,025, or 88%10.3%, from revenues of $198,000$9,958 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.2013. This decreaseincrease was due to lower sales totaling $170,000mainly a result of the collection system relatinggrowing sales of the recently market launched cytology product lines to $1,852 (+38 %) and the detection of breast cancer, which we are selling on behalf of another company, a decreasegrowing revenue in sales ofourSoftPAP cervical cell collector totaling $1,000 and a reduction in licensing fees of $3,000.
Costs and Expenses
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues represents the cost of the product sold, freight, and other costs of selling our products.Cost of revenues totaled $8,000$7,164 (65% of revenue) for the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, as compared to $104,000$5,746 (58% of revenue) for the year ended December 31, 2012. The decrease2013. This mainly resulted from a higher percentage of distributor versus direct sales in cost of revenues is attributable primarily2014 compared to the decrease in sales of a third-party product along with a small increase in sales of our2013.
SoftPAP cervical cell collector.
Research and development expenses are an important part of our business to keep our existing products competitive and to develop new innovative solutions with interesting market potential that will help us grow future revenues. These expenses include research work for cancer marker consumables and developing work, including engineering and industrial design, for histology and engineering covering the disposable and instrument componentscytology laboratories worldwide. Major parts ofCytoCore SolutionsSystem, payments to medical and engineering consultants for advice related to the design and development of our products and their potential uses in the medical technology marketplace, and these expenses are payroll-related costs for in-house scientific research, mechanical and electrical engineering, scientific, laboratory,instrument related software development staff, prototype expenses and research management staff.
For the 20132014 fiscal year, research and development expenses were $250,000 aincreased to $1,243 compared to $336,000$934 for 2013. This increase of $309 or 33% is the 2012 fiscal year, a reduction of $85,000 or 25%. This reduction is attributable to $63,000 in fees paid to medical consultants, an decrease of $7,000 related to costs incurred for the ongoing improvementresult of theSoftPAP cervical collection device inclusion of the former CytoCore, Inc. results in 2014, which added approximately $194 versus none in 2013 and other research, a $4,000 decreaseinternal growth in depreciation expenseour R&D in Germany of $115. We expect to continue to expend considerable effort and a $12,000 decrease in personnel costs.
Selling, General and Administrative
For the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, SG&A expenses were $584,000 after an adjustment$2,800 versus $2,798 in 2013. Our 2014 costs are now burdened with the administrative costs of trade debt totaling $214,000, an adjustment relatingthe former CytoCore, Inc. which amounted to approximately $440, which also included one-time audit costs for MEDITE Enterprise Inc. Our SG&A for MEDITE therefore decreased on a year over basis of approximately $438 as a result of a settlement of $266 with a former subsidiary of MEDITE and cost reductions of $172.
Operating Income
The operating loss of $394 compared to the liquidationoperating profit of our subsidiaries$294 in 2013 MEDITE was primarily the result of $149,000 and an adjustment for an accrual for franchise taxes totaling $227,000. The SG&A expenses represent a $443,000, or 43%, decrease from SG&A expenses of $1,027,000 after an adjustment of trade debt totaling $546,000inclusion in 2014 the results post-merger for the corresponding periodformer CytoCore, Inc. which was approximately $638 in 2012. Of this $443,000 decrease, depreciation expense decreased $135,000, marketing costs decreased $67,000, consulting fees decreased $99,000, travel expenses decreased $11,000, administrative payroll cost decreased $87,000, leasing costs decreased $9,000, professional fees decreased $39,000, an adjustment related of trade debt totaled $214,000, an adjustment relating to the liquidation of our subsidiaries totaled $149,000, and a franchiseoperating losses.
Income Tax
The increase in income tax expense decreased $227,000. These decreases were partially offsetin 2014 was primarily the result of recording an allowance for US deferred tax assets for net operating losses incurred by increasesthe US subsidiary of MEDITE, which are now combined with those of the former CytoCore for US income tax reporting purposes. This allowance resulted in transfer agent fees of $8,000, insurancethe Company recording income tax expense of $5,000, directors’ feesapproximately $129 for the US subsidiary of $10,000, investor relations feesMEDITE. Because of $22,000, other costs decreased $3,000 and the adjustmenthistory of trade debt of $546,000losses for the former CytoCore, Inc. the company has allowed for all the deferred tax assets in the corresponding period in 2012.
Net Loss
The net loss for the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, totaled $923,000,$699, as compared to $1,514,000 for 2012, a decreasenet income of $591,000 or 39%. Of this decrease, $443,000 related to decreases in SG&A expenses, $86,000 related to decreases in R&D costs, $96,000 related to decreases in cost of revenues and $140,000 related to decreases in interest expense. These decreases were partially offset by decrease in revenues totaling $174,000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2012,2014 we havehad a working capital deficit of approximately $1,009. However, that deficit includes approximately $2,335 of accrued wages and payroll taxes and franchise taxes that we do not issued 2,363,194 sharesintend to pay until such time as we raise substantial additional cash either through operations or through future equity and debt raises.
In 2014 the Company raised gross proceeds of $1,979 in two private placement offerings of its common stock from 2012stock. In 2015, the Company raised an additional $325 in the second offering and prior periods.
In January 2015, MEDITE GmbH reduced its outstanding indebtedness under its master credit line with Hannoversche Volksbank to be under the Euro 1.6 million limit imposed by the Bank. The Company is required to pay down its line of credit with Hannoversche Volksbank further, by approximately Euro 500,000 on or before May 31, 2015 to Euro 1.1 million. The bank has already granted extensions to the Company and the Company believes that the bank will work with the Company as it raises additional equity. Should the bank be unwilling to grant further extensions, the Company believes that it can obtain bank funding elsewhere at equivalent terms or if necessary raise the funds needed through operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2013,2014, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partners, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
Financial Statementsand Supplementary Data |
Our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, together with the report of L J Soldinger Associates LLC, dated April 14, 2014, and the notes thereto, are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K commencing on page F-1 and are incorporated herein by reference.
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
Not Applicable.
Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) was carried out by us under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer,Chief Executive Officer, who serves as our principal executive officer, and our Chief Financial Officer, who serves as our principal financial officer. Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of December 31, 2013,2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure (i) that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer,Chief Executive Oofficer and Chief Financial Officer, in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officerChief Executive Officer, who serves as our principal executive officer, and our Chief Financial Officer, who serves as our principal financial officer, we conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (‘‘COSO’’) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on management’s assessment based on the criteria of the COSO, we concluded that, as of December 31, 2013,2014, our internal control over financial reporting is effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
| (i) | pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; |
| (ii) | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorization of our management and directors; and |
| (iii) | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. |
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which permits us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control system over financial reporting during the fourth fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20132014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Other Information |
On April 3, 2014, Richard A. Domanik resigned his position as the Chief Operating Officer of the Company, as a result of our acquisition of Medite.MEDITE. Mr. Domanik continues as an employee. There were no disagreements between us and Dr. Domanik on any matter relating to our operations, policies, or practices which led to his resignation.
Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance |
| Name | Age | Positions with the Company | |||
| Michaela Ott | Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||||
| Michael Ott | President, Chief Operating Officer and Director | ||||
| Robert F. McCullough, Jr. | Chief Financial Officer and Director | ||||
| John H. Abeles, M.D. | Director | ||||
| Alexander M. Milley | Director | ||||
| Augusto Ocana | Director | ||||
Board of Directors
We believe that our Board should be composed of individuals with sophistication and experience in many substantive areas that impact our business. We believe that experience, qualifications, or skills in the following areas are most important: accounting and finance; design, innovation and engineering; strategic planning; human resources and development practices; and board practices of other corporations. These areas are in addition to the personal qualifications described in this section. We believe that all of our current Board members possess the professional and personal qualifications necessary for board service, and have highlighted particularly noteworthy attributes for each Board member in the individual biographies below. The principal occupation and business experience, for at least the past five years, and educational background of each current director is as follows:
Michaela Ottwas appointed to serve as Chief Executive Officer and is member of the board of directors concurrently with our acquisition of MediteMEDITE on April 3, 2014. Mrs. Ott has served as Co-President of Medite GMBHMEDITE GmbH since 2006 and as a director Mediteof MEDITE Enterprises, Inc. since 2013. Ms. Ott has a degree in Industrial Business Management, was a major shareholder and COO of a Fiber Optic manufacturer company before and possesses particular knowledge and experience that strengthen the Board’s collective qualifications, skills, and experience.experience
Michael Ottwas appointed to serve as President and Chief Operating officer and is member of the board of directors concurrently with our acquisition of MediteMEDITE on April 3, 2014. Mr. Ott has served as Co-President of Medite GMBHMEDITE GmbH since 2006 and as Chief Executive Officer and President of MediteMEDITE Enterprises, Inc. since 2013. Mr. Ott has a Master of Business Administration in international management, has experience as CFO of a German medical device stock listed company, served as CEO of a German laser technology company and possesses particular knowledge and experience that strengthen the Board’s collective qualifications, skills, and experience.
Robert F. McCullough, Jr. was elected Chief Financial Officer and director of the Company in September 2005 and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in October 2007. Mr. McCullough was appointed to serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors on April 21, 2009.Effective April 3, 2014, Mr. McCullough resigned his position as Chief Executive Office of the Company.From October 2003 to January 2011, Mr. McCullough also served as President and as a Portfolio Manager of Summitcrest Capital, Inc., a money management firm and registered investment adviser, which was formerly a holder of approximately 4.9% of our issued and outstanding common stock. From April 1999 to July 2003, Mr. McCullough served as a Portfolio Manager at Presidio Management, a money management firm. Prior to this, Mr. McCullough served as a manager with the accounting firm of Ernst & Whinney (now Ernst & Young) and also served as a financial analyst, a portfolio manager and a Chief Financial Officer of several private companies. Mr. McCullough has a MastersMaster of Business Administration in finance and is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. McCullough possesses particular knowledge and experience in accounting and finance, organizational leadership and strategic planning that strengthen the Board’s collective qualifications, skills, and experience. In a civil action brought by the SEC in January 2011, the SEC alleged that Mr. McCullough failed to report transactions in Company securities, failed to accurately report his beneficial ownership of Company securities in our proxy statement, and aided and abetted us in violating Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act. In February 2011, Mr. McCullough consented to the entry of a final judgment pursuant to which he was permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, and from aiding and abetting violations of Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act and paid a civil penalty in the amount of $100,000.
John H. Abeles, M.D. has been a director of the Company since May 1999. Dr. Abeles is President of MedVest, Inc., a venture capital and consulting firm he founded in 1980. He is also General Partner of Northlea Partners, Ltd., a family investment partnership. Dr. Abeles previously served as a senior medical executive at Sterling Drug Company, Pfizer, Inc. and Revlon Healthcare, Inc. and subsequently was a medical analyst at Kidder, Peabody & Co. Dr. Abeles is a director of a number of companies operating in the medical device and healthcare fields, including publicly-traded companies DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and CombiMatrix Corp. Dr. Abeles has also served as a director of I-Flow Corporation (now a subsidiary of Kimberly Clark Corporation) and Oryx Technology Corp. Dr. Abeles possesses particular knowledge and experience in medical education, venture capital and finance, and the pharmaceutical industry that strengthen the Board’s collective qualifications, skills, and experience.
Alexander M. Milleyhas been a director of the Company since 1989. Mr. Milley is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of ELXSI Corp., a publicly-held holding company with subsidiaries operating in the restaurant and environmental inspection equipment industries. Mr. Milley has served as Chairman and CEO of ELXSI since September 1989, and was elected President of that company in August 1990. He is also President and Chairman of the Board of Azimuth Corporation, a holding company with subsidiaries operating in the trade show exhibit, retail environment design, and electrical components and fastener distribution industries. From 1988 until 2004, Mr. Milley served as a director and Vice President of Contempo Design, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of trade show exhibits. Contempo Design, Inc. filed a petition a petition under Chapter 11 of the federal Bankruptcy Code in 2004. Mr. Milley was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Bell National Corporation, our predecessor, until December 1998 and was President of Bell National from August 1990 until December 1998. Mr. Milley is the founder, President, sole director and majority stockholder of Milley Management, Inc., a private investment and management-consulting firm. Mr. Milley is also a director and executive officer of Cadmus Corporation, a private investment and management consulting firm, and Winchester National, Inc., an investment holding company. Mr. Milley possesses particular knowledge and experience in finance, management, marketing and public company governance that strengthen the Board’s collective qualifications, skills, and experience.
Dr. Mauro Scimia has served as a consultant to the Company since 2011. Prior to this, from 2009 to 2011, he served as a consultant to Greiner BioOne, a life sciences company, where he assisted with establishing distribution networks and developing a private laboratory network. During 2007 and 2008, he served as a consultant to Third Wave Technologies (Madison), a developer of cervical cancer screening tests, where he assisted with establishing distribution channels in Italy, France and Spain. From 2000 to 2006, Dr. Scimia served as the Country Manager for Cytyc Italy, a subsidiary of Cytyc Corporation. Prior to this, he served in several sales and management positions for several pharmaceutical and life sciences companies. As a result of these and other professional experiences, Dr. Scimia possesses particular knowledge and experience in sales strategies, product distribution and the life sciences industry which strengthens the Board’s collective qualifications, skills, and experience.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and holders of more than 10% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the Commission. They are also required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file with the SEC. Based solely on our review of copies of such forms received by us and/or any written representations from such persons that no other reports were required with respect to 2013,2014, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements were satisfied in a timely fashion during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2013,2014, except that Drs. Abeles, Scimia and Carbonell, Mr. Milley and Mr. Ocana failed to timely file Form 4s.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted ourCode of Ethics and Business Conduct for Officers, Directors and Employees that applies to all of our officers, directors and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. We filed the code as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Commission on April 14, 2004. The Code of Ethics is also available on our website at www.cytocoreinc.com.
Board of Directors and Committee Information
The Board of Directors currently has three standing committees – the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees were established by the Board in 2008.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee currently consists of Mr. Milley (Chairman) and Dr. Abeles, both of whom are independent under applicable independence requirements. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Milley qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act.
The Audit Committee acts pursuant to a written charter, which charter authorizes the committee’s overview of the financial operations and management of the Company, including a required review process for all quarterly, annual, and special filings with the Commission, review of the adequacy and efficacy of the accounting and financial controls of the Company as well as the quality of accounting principles and financial disclosure practices, and communications with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and members of financial management. A copy of the Audit Committee’s charter was filed as an appendix to the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2007 annual stockholders meeting, as filed with the SEC on May 15, 2007, and is available on our website. The Audit Committee met four times in 2013.
Stockholder Nominations
There were no material changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to our board of directors during the 20132014 fiscal year.
Executive Compensation |
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the compensation earned by the Company’s principal executive officer, and each of the Company’s two most highly compensated executive officers other than the principal executive officer whose compensation exceeded $100,000 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”), during the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012.
| Name | |||||||||
| and | Salary | Total | |||||||
| Principal Position | Year | ($) | ($) | ||||||
| Robert F. McCullough, Jr. (1) | 2013 | $ | 180,000 | (2) | $ | 180,000 | |||
| CEO, CFO and Chairman of the Board | 2012 | $ | 180,000 | (2) | $ | 90,000 | |||
| Richard A. Domanik, Ph.D. (3) | 2013 | $ | 150,000 | (4) | $ | 150,000 | |||
| COO | 2012 | $ | 150,000 | (4) | $ | 150,000 | |||
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock awards ($) | Option awards ($) | ||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Michaela Ott (1) | 2014 | 159,516 | (2) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
| CEO | 2013 | 226,347 | (2) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
| Michael Ott (3) | 2014 | 159,516 | (4) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
| COO anc President | 2013 | 218,395 | (4) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
| Robert F. McCullough, Jr. (5) | 2014 | 140,000 | (6) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
| CFO and Chairman of the Board | 2013 | 180,000 | (6) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
| Richard A. Domanik, Ph.D. (7) | 2014 | 37,500 | (8) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
| COO until April 3th, 2014 | 2013 | 150,000 | (8) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Nonequity incentive plan compensation ($) | Nonqualified deferred compensation earnings ($) | All other compensation | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | |||||||||||||||
| Michaela Ott (1) | 2014 | - | - | - | 159,516 | |||||||||||||||
| CEO | 2013 | - | - | - | 226,347 | |||||||||||||||
| Michael Ott (3) | 2014 | - | - | - | 159,516 | |||||||||||||||
| COO anc President | 2013 | - | - | - | 218,395 | |||||||||||||||
| Robert F. McCullough, Jr. (5) | 2014 | - | - | - | 140,000 | |||||||||||||||
| CFO and Chairman of the Board | 2013 | - | - | - | 180,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Richard A. Domanik, Ph.D. (7) | 2014 | - | - | - | 37,500 | |||||||||||||||
| COO until April 3th, 2014 | 2013 | - | - | - | 150,000 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | Mrs. Michaela Ott served as Chief Executive Officer from April 3, 2014 after the acquisition of MEDITE. | |
| (2) | Salary converted to USD based on agreement with MEDITE GmbH in EURO currency, EURO 120,000 | |
| (3) | Mr. Michael Ott, served as Chief Operating Officer from April 3, 2014 after the acquisition of MEDITE. | |
| (4) | Salary converted to USD based on agreement with MEDITE GmbH in EURO currency, EURO 120,000 | |
| (5) | Mr. McCullough served as our Chief Executive Officer from October 2007 through April 3, 2014 and as our Chief Financial Officer since September 2005. |
| Mr. McCullough has deferred payment of 100% of his salary earned in |
| Dr. Domanik served as our Chief Operating Officer from October 2007 through April 3, 2014, and has also served as our President from May 2007 until August 2008. |
| Dr. Domanik has deferred payment of 100% of his salary earned in 2013 and |
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
Our named executive officers did not own any outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 20132014 as we have no plans in place (see below).
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table
Mrs. Ott earned an annual salary of $159,516 in 2014 and $ 226,347 in 2013 based on the employment agreement with MEDITE GmbH. The higher amount in 2013 results form a royalty for profits in the fiscal year 2012 of the subsidiary MEDITE GmbH
Mr. Ott earned an annual salary of $ 159,516 in 2014 and $ 218,395 in 2013 based on the employment agreement with MEDITE GmbH. The higher amount in 2013 results form a royalty for profits in the fiscal year 2012 of the subsidiary MEDITE GmbH
Mr. McCullough earned an annual salary of $ 140,000 in 2014 and $180,000 in 2013, and 2012, respectively, and has elected to defer payment of 100% of such salary. We do not have any employment agreement with Mr. McCullough.
We have not entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Domanik, although the basic terms of his compensation have been established. Specifically, we pay Dr. Domanik an annual salary of $150,000,$75,000 (before April, 2014: $150,000), standard benefits as provided to other employees, and reimbursement of reasonable business expenses. Dr. Dominick elected to defer salary totaling $150,000 for the 2013 and 2012$37,500 for the first quarter of 2014 until fiscal years.
Equity Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In 1999, we adopted the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, both of which expired in 2009. For additional information, see“Equity Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan” in Item 12 below.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control
We do not offer or have in place any formal severance, change in control or similar compensation programs for our officers or employees. Rather, we individually negotiate with those employees for whom such compensation is deemed necessary. We do not currently have an agreement with any officer with respect to severance, change of control or a similar circumstance. We are obligated to provide warrants to our outside directors upon the occurrence of certain changes in control. For more information, see ““Compensation of Directors” below.
Compensation of Directors” below.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation of directors for our 20132014 fiscal year.
| Fees Earned | |||||||
| or Paid in | |||||||
| Cash | Total | ||||||
| Name(1) | ($) | ($) | |||||
| John H. Abeles, M.D. | $ | 20,000 | (2) | $ | 20,000 | (3) | |
| Alexander M. Milley | $ | 20,000 | (2) | $ | 20,000 | (3) | |
| Xavier Carbonell | $ | — | (4) | $ | — | ||
| Mauro Scimia | $ | — | (4) | $ | — | ||
| Augusto Ocana | $ | — | (4) | $ | — | ||
| Fees Earned or | ||||||||
| Paid in Cash | Total | |||||||
| Name | ($) | ($) | ||||||
| Michaela Ott | 159,516 | (1) | 159,516 | |||||
| Michael Ott | 159,516 | (1) | 159,516 | |||||
| Robert F. McCullough | 140,000 | (1) | 140,000 | |||||
| John H. Abeles, M.D. | 20,000 | (2) | 20,000 | (3) | ||||
| Alexander M. Milley | 20,000 | (2) | 20,000 | (3) | ||||
| Augusto Ocana | 20,000 | (4) | 20,000 | (3) | ||||
(1) Mrs. Ott, Mr. Ott and Mr. McCullough has been omitted from this table as he is aare management membermembers of our board of directors and is not separately compensated for his service on the board of directors.
(2) Represents director fees with respect to fiscal year 2013.2014. This amount includes $5,000 in fees payable to each director which were paid through the issuance of common stock.
(3) As of December 31, 2013,2014, each of these directors is entitled to receive 100,0001,000 (100,000 before the reverse split) shares of common stock in connection with a stock bonus provided to each of our directors in 2009.
(4) Does not include consulting fees and sales commissions earned in 2013.2014. See“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence”in item 13 below.
Narrative Disclosure to Director Compensation Table
We currently pay our outside directors a quarterly fee of $5,000 as compensation for their service on our board of directors. Since 2009, our directors have deferred receipt of such fees. We also reimburse all directors for their reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the board of directors. In addition, all outside directors are entitled to receive warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock when our annual revenues reach $20 million and warrants to purchase an additional 25,000 shares of common stock when our annual revenues reach $50 million. The exercise price of such warrants will be at a 33% discount to the average trading price of the common stock during the 45 days prior to the date we achieve each revenue milestone.
For information on other consideration received by directors or their affiliates from the Company, see “Transactions“Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons”Persons” in Item 13 below.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
Common Stock
The following table sets forth certain information, as of April 3,December 31, 2014 with respect to holdings of our common stock by (i) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding as of such date, (ii) each of our directors and executive officers, and (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each person is c/o CytoCore,MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics, Inc., 414 N. Orleans4203 SW 34th Street, Suite 503, Chicago, Illinois 60654.
| Amount and Nature of | Percent | ||||
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Beneficial Ownership(1) | of Class | |||
| Michaela Ott | 1,468,750,000 | (2) | 77.1 | % | |
| Michael Ott | 1,468,750,000 | (3) | 77.1 | % | |
| Robert F. McCullough | 167,690,706 | (4) | 8.8 | % | |
| Augusto Ocana | 9,090,835 | * | |||
| Mauro Scimia | 5,959,750 | * | |||
| John H. Abeles, M.D. | 12,625,598 | (5) | * | ||
| Alexander M. Milley | 4,652,950 | (6) | * | ||
| Xavier Carbonell | 6,569,823 | * | |||
| All current directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons) | 1,675,339,662 | 88.0 | % |
| Amount and Nature of | Percent | |||||||
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Beneficial Ownership(1) | of Class | ||||||
| Michaela Ott | 14,687,500 | (2) | 75.7 | % | ||||
| Michael Ott | 14,687,500 | (3) | 75.7 | % | ||||
| Robert F. McCullough, Jr. | 1.676,907 | (4) | 8.6 | % | ||||
| Augusto Ocana | 124,422 | * | ||||||
| Alexander M. Milley | 46,530 | (6) | * | |||||
| John H. Abeles, M.D. | 126,256 | (5) | * | |||||
| All current directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons) | 16,661,615 | 85.9 | % | |||||
| · | Less than one percent | ||
| (1) | Unless otherwise indicated, each of the persons named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite such person’s name. With respect to each person or group, percentages are calculated based on the number of shares beneficially owned, including shares that may be acquired by such person or group within 60 days of | ||
| 15, 2015. | |||
| (2) | Includes: (i) |
| (3) | Includes: (i) |
| (4) | Includes an aggregate | |
| (5) | Includes: (i) |
| (6) | Includes: (i) |
Series E Convertible Preferred Stock
The following table sets forth certain information, as of April 3, 201415, 2015 with respect to holdings of our Series E Convertible Preferred Stock by (i) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the total number of shares of our Series E Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of such date, (ii) each of our directors and executive officers, and (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group.
| Amount and Nature of | Percent | ||||
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) | Beneficial Ownership(2) | of Class | |||
| Kevin F. Flynn June 1992 Non-Exempt Trust | 6,667 | (3) | 35.0 | % | |
| 120 South LaSalle Street | |||||
| Chicago, IL 60602 | |||||
| Rolf Lagerquist | 2,000 | (4) | 10.5 | % | |
| 4522 CO Road 21 NE | |||||
| Elgin, MN 55932 |
| Amount and Nature of | Percent | |||||||
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) | Beneficial Ownership(2) | of Class | ||||||
| Kevin F. Flynn June 1992 Non-Exempt Trust | 68 | (3) | 35.8 | % | ||||
| 120 South LaSalle Street | ||||||||
| Chicago, IL 60602 | ||||||||
| Rolf Lagerquist | 20 | (4) | 10.5 | % | ||||
| 4522 CO Road 21 NE | ||||||||
| Elgin, MN 55932 | ||||||||
| (1) | No executive officers or directors own any shares of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock. |
| (2) | Unless otherwise indicated, each of the persons named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite such person’s name.With respect to each person or group, percentages are calculated based on the number of shares beneficially owned, including shares that may be acquired by such person or group within 60 days of April |
| (3) | Converts into |
| (4) | Converts into |
Equity Compensation Plan Information
| Number of securities | ||||||||
| Number of securities | remaining available for future | |||||||
| to be issued upon | Weighted-average | issuance under equity | ||||||
| exercise of outstanding | exercise price of | compensation plans (excluding | ||||||
| options, warrants and | outstanding options, | securities reflected in column | ||||||
| Plan category | rights | warrants and rights | (a)) | |||||
| (a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||
| Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders | ||||||||
| None | — | — | — | |||||
| Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders | ||||||||
| Warrants issued for officer, director and employee compensation (1) | 39,000 | $ | 0.01 | — | ||||
| Total | 39,000 | $ | 0.01 | — |
| Number of securities | ||||||||||||
| Number of securities | remaining available for future | |||||||||||
| to be issued upon | Weighted-average | issuance under equity | ||||||||||
| exercise of outstanding | exercise price of | compensation plans (excluding | ||||||||||
| options, warrants and | outstanding options, | securities reflected in column | ||||||||||
| Plan category | rights | warrants and rights | (a)) | |||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||||||
| Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders | ||||||||||||
| None | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders | ||||||||||||
| Warrants issued for officer, director and employee compensation (1) | 390 | $ | 1.00 | — | ||||||||
| Total | 390 | $ | 1.00 | — | ||||||||
| 1) | We have issued warrants in lieu of cash payment for employment services, for achieving certain goals or for other corporate reasons. During fiscal year |
Changes in Control
The acquisition of any arrangements (including any pledge by any personMEDITE Enterprise, Inc. in April 2014 in exchange for the majority of our securities), the operation offormer CytoCore, Inc. shares is considered as a reverse merger which did or may at a subsequent date resultsubsequently resulted in a change of control.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
The following section sets forth information regarding transactions since January 1, 2013,2014, or any currently proposed transactions, between us and certain related persons. For more information on the compensation received by our directors and officers, and the beneficial ownership of equity securities of the Company by such individuals, see Item 11 “Executive Compensation” and Item 12 “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” above.
Robert F. McCullough, Jr., Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors
Mr. McCullough loaned to us an aggregate $159,500 and $639,000 during the 20132013fiscal year, respectively. The amount of 10,000 was repaid in 2014 and 2012 fiscal years, respectively.2015. On May 20, 2013, we issued 162,500,0001,625,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. McCullough for the cancellation of $3.25 million of outstanding indebtedness payable by us to Mr. McCullough. The aggregate outstanding balance of $77,750$110,006 is payable upon demand and does not accrue interest.
Payment of Consulting Fees and Commissions to Directors
During the years ended December 31, 2013,2014, we engaged in the following transactions with our directors:
In 2013 we issued 1,805,528 shares of common stock to Xavier Carbonell in payment of consulting services;
Related Person Transaction Approval Policy
We recognize that related person transactions can present potential or actual conflicts of interest and create the appearance that our decisions are based on considerations other than the best interests of us and our stockholders. The Board of Directors, therefore, adopted a written policy in May 2008 that requires the review, approval or ratification of all such transactions by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors in accordance with the procedures established for such transactions.
For these purposes, a “related person transaction” is any transaction, arrangement or relationship (or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which we or any subsidiary is, was or will be a participant and in which a related person has, had or will have a direct or indirect interest. A “related person” includes executive officers, directors and nominees for election as a director, five percent holders, and any immediate family members of the foregoing. It also includes entities in which any of the foregoing is employed or is a partner or principal or in a similar position, or in which such person has a five percent or greater beneficial ownership interest.
In advance of each regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting, management must propose those transactions to be entered into by us for the coming calendar quarter, including the material terms of such transactions, the parties involved, the interests of the related person(s) in such transactions, and the proposed aggregate value of each such transaction (if calculable). After review, the Audit Committee must approve or disapprove such transactions and at each subsequently scheduled meeting, management must update the Audit Committee as to any material change to those proposed transactions. If advance approval of a related person transaction is not feasible, such transactions may be preliminarily entered into by management, subject to ratification by the Audit Committee at its next meeting. A transaction also may be approved by the Chairman of the Audit Committee, who possesses delegated authority to act between meetings, in circumstances where it is not practicable or desirable for us to wait until the next committee meeting.
Review and evaluation of a related person transaction include an examination of all material facts and relevant factors, including without limitation:
| · | the risks and benefits of such transaction to us; |
| · | the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction; |
| · | the impact on a director’s independence in the event the related person involved in the transaction is a director, an immediate family member or an affiliated entity; |
| · | if applicable, the availability of other sources of comparable products and services; and |
| · | whether such transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances. |
The Audit Committee shall approve or ratify only those transactions that, in light of known circumstances, are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and our stockholders, as the Audit Committee determines in good faith. The committee may also determine to provide standing approval of certain types of transactions. No director shall participate in any discussion or approval of a related person transaction for which he or she is a related person, except that the director is required to provide all material information concerning such transaction as requested by the Audit Committee or the Board of Directors.
Director Independence
Upon consideration of the criteria and requirements regarding director independence set forth in Rules 5000(a)(19) and 5605(a)(2) of the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, we have determined that Dr. Abeles and Messrs.Mr. Milley are independent. With regard to our audit committee, the board of directors has determined that Dr. Abeles and Mr. Milley, who constitute all members of the audit committee, are independent with respect to the independence criteria for audit committee members set forth in Rule 5605(c)(2) of the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
L J Soldinger Associates LLC (“LJSA”) served as our independent registered pubicpublic accounting firm each of the fiscal years ending December 31, 20132014 and 2012.
Fees
The following table presents fees for the professional services rendered by LJSA for fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively:
| Services Performed | 2013 | 2012 | |||||
| Audit Fees(1) | $ | 80,000 | $ | 85,000 | |||
| Audit-Related Fees(2) | 1,680 | 1,560 | |||||
| Tax Fees(3) | 4,352 | 2,772 | |||||
| All Other Fees(4) | — | — | |||||
| Total Fees | $ | 86,032 | $ | 89,332 | |||
| Services Performed | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
| Audit Fees(1) | $ | 205,961 | $ | 80,000 | ||||
| Audit-Related Fees(2) | 4,644 | 1,680 | ||||||
| Tax Fees(3) | 3,598 | 4,352 | ||||||
| All Other Fees(4) | — | — | ||||||
| Total Fees | $ | 214,203 | $ | 86,032 | ||||
| (1) | Audit fees represent fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. |
| (2) | Audit-related fees represent fees billed for assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements not reported in (1) above, including those incurred in connection with securities registration and/or other issues resulting from that process. |
| (3) | Tax fees represent fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services. |
| (4) | All other fees principally would include fees billed for products and services provided by the accountant, other than the services reported under the three captions above. |
Pre-Approval Policies
As required by applicable law, the Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm. In connection with such responsibilities, the Audit Committee is required, and it is the Audit Committee’s policy, to pre-approve the audit and permissible non-audit services (both the type and amount) performed by our independent registered public accounting firm in order to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair the firm’s independence, in appearance or fact.
The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit services provided to us during fiscal 2013.2014. Non-audit services provided to us during fiscal year 20132014 were for tax compliance.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
Documents filed as part of this Annual Report
| 1. | Financial Statements |
| 2. | Financial Statement Schedules |
| 3. | Exhibits |
(*) Denotes an exhibit filed herewith.
Exhibit No. | Description | |
| 2.1 | Stock Purchase Agreement by and among |
| 2.2 | Amendment No. 1 to Stock Purchase Agreement by and among | |
| 2.3 | Amendment No. 2 to Stock Purchase Agreement by and among | |
| 3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 26, 2001.) | |
| 3.2 | By-laws of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix E to the 1999 Proxy Statement.) | |
| 3.3 | Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, as filed with the SEC on March 29, 2001) | |
| 3.4 | Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, as filed with the SEC on March 29, 2001) | |
| 3.5 | Section 6 of Article VII of the By-laws of the Company, as amended. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-4 (Reg. # 333-61666), as filed with the SEC on May 25, 2000) | |
| 3.6 | Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-2 (Reg. # 333-83578), as filed with the SEC on February 28, 2002) | |
| 3.7 | Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-2 (Reg. # 333-83578), as filed with the SEC on February 28, 2002) | |
| 3.8 | Certificate of Amendment of Amended Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-2 (Reg. # 333-83578), as filed with the SEC on February 28, 2002) | |
| 3.9 | Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-2 (Reg. # 333-83578), as filed with the SEC on February 28, 2002) |
| 3.10 | Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.8 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-2 (Reg. # 333-83578), as filed with the SEC on February 28, 2002) | |
| 3.11 | Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated August 5, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the SEC on August 16, 2004) | |
| 3.12 | Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, dated June 22, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the SEC on August 21, 2006) | |
| 3.13 | Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated June 22, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the SEC on August 17, 2007) |
| 3.14 | Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated November 19, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the SEC on April 2, 2008) | |
| 4.1 | Registration Rights Agreement in connection with $7 million maximum offering of Units completed in March 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.22 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the SEC on April 2, 2008) | |
| 4.2 | Form of Warrant in connection with $7 million maximum offering of Units completed in March 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.23 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the SEC on April 2, 2008) | |
| 10.1 | Service agreement with Cell Solutions, LLC. Dated October 9, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on May 15, 2010) | |
| 10.2 | Distribution | |
| 10.3 | Consulting | |
| 14.1 | Code of Ethics and Business Conduct of Officers, Directors and Employees of CytoCore, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s | |
| 31.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 31.2* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 32.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 32.2* | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 101.INS** | XBRL Instance Document | |
| 101.SCH** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
| 101.CAL** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
| 101.DEF** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
| 101.LAB** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
| 101.PRE** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
By: | /s/ Michaela Ott | |
| Michaela Ott | ||
Chief Executive Officer Principal Executive Officer | ||
By: | /s/ Robert McCullough, Jr. | |
| Robert McCullough, Jr. | ||
| Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Principal Financial Officer | ||
| Date: | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
| /s/ Michaela Ott | Chief Executive Officer | |||
| Michaela Ott | (Principal Executive Officer) | |||
| and Director | ||||
| /s/ Michael Ott | Chief Operating Officer and | |||
| Michael Ott | Director | |||
| /s/ Robert McCullough, Jr. | Chief Financial Officer | |||
| Robert McCullough, Jr. | (Principal Financial Officer) and | |||
| Director | ||||
| /s/ Alexander M. Milley | Director | |||
| Alexander M. Milley | ||||
| /s/ John Abeles, M.D. | Director | |||
| John Abeles, M.D. | ||||
| /s/ Augusto Ocana | Director | |||
| Augusto Ocana | ||||
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of CytoCore,Medite Cancer Diagnostics , Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CytoCore,MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income , shareholders' deficitequity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of its internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CytoCore,MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics, Inc. as of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 and the results of their operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ L J Soldinger Associates, LLC
Deer Park, Illinois
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| December 31, | |||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
| Assets | |||||||
| Current Assets: | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1 | $ | 39 | |||
| Accounts receivable | 10 | 134 | |||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 5 | 10 | |||||
| Total current assets | 16 | 183 | |||||
| Property and equipment, net | 5 | 79 | |||||
| Total assets | $ | 21 | $ | 262 | |||
| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) | |||||||
| Current Liabilities: | |||||||
| Account payable | $ | 311 | $ | 681 | |||
| Accrued payroll costs | 3,324 | 2,705 | |||||
| Accrued expenses | 537 | 903 | |||||
| Advances from related parties | 85 | 3,175 | |||||
| Notes payable | 36 | 70 | |||||
| Total current liabilities | 4,293 | 7,534 | |||||
| Commitments and Contingencies | — | — | |||||
| Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit): | |||||||
| Preferred stock; $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 373,355 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012 (Liquidation value of all classes of preferred stock of $2,871 at December 31, 2013) | 1,487 | 1,487 | |||||
| Common stock, $0.001 par value; 2,000,000,000 and 500,000,000 shares authorized; 270,530,857 and 78,226,416 shares issued and issuable and 270,511,648 and 78,207,207 shares outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively | 271 | 78 | |||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 97,137 | 93,407 | |||||
| Treasury stock at cost: 19,209 shares at December 31, 2013 and 2012 | (327) | (327) | |||||
| Accumulated deficit | (102,840) | (101,917) | |||||
| Total stockholders’ deficit | (4,272) | (7,272) | |||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit | $ | 21 | $ | 262 | |||
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Current Assets: | ||||||||
| Cash | $ | 230 | $ | 75 | ||||
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts | 1,991 | 1,594 | ||||||
| Inventories | 3,415 | 3,953 | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 154 | 487 | ||||||
| Total current assets | 5,790 | 6,109 | ||||||
| Property and equipment, net | 2,091 | 1,867 | ||||||
| In-process Research and Development | 4,620 | |||||||
| Trademarks, trade names | 1,240 | |||||||
| Goodwill | 2,453 | - | ||||||
| Other Assets | 245 | 194 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 16,439 | $ | 8,170 | ||||
| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
| Current Liabilities: | ||||||||
| Secured lines of credit and current portion of long-term debt | $ | 2,555 | $ | 2,739 | ||||
| Account payable and accrued expenses | 4,134 | 1,236 | ||||||
| Advance – Related Parties | 110 | - | ||||||
| Total current liabilities | 6,799 | 3,975 | ||||||
| Long term debt, net of current portion | 1,209 | 1,571 | ||||||
| Total Liabilities | 8,008 | 5,546 | ||||||
| Commitments and Contingencies | ||||||||
| Stockholders’ Equity : | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 373,355 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014 (liquidation value of all classes of preferred stock $2,871 as of December 31, 2014) | 1,487 | - | ||||||
| Common stock, $0.001 par value; 3.5 billion shares authorized, 19,427,331 and 14,687,500 issued, issuable and outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 respectively | 19 | 15 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 5,763 | (15 | ) | |||||
| Treasury Stock | (327 | ) | - | |||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (149 | ) | 287 | |||||
| Retained Earnings | 1,638 | 2,337 | ||||||
| Total stockholders’ equity | 8,431 | 2,624 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 16,439 | $ | 8,170 | ||||
*Derived from audited information
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
| Net Sales | $ | 24 | $ | 198 | |||
| Operating Expenses | |||||||
| Cost of revenues | 8 | 104 | |||||
| Research and development | 250 | 336 | |||||
| Selling, general and administrative (net of adjustment of trade debt of $214,000, a reduction in accrued franchise tax of $227,000 and benefit from the liquidation of subsidiaries of $149,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and net of adjustment of trade debt of $546,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012) | 584 | 1,027 | |||||
| Total cost and expenses | 842 | 1,467 | |||||
| Operating Loss | (818) | (1,269) | |||||
| Other Income (Expense): | |||||||
| Interest expense | (8) | (14) | |||||
| Interest expense – related party | (97) | (231) | |||||
| Total other income (expense) | (105) | (245) | |||||
| Loss from operations before income taxes | (923) | (1,514) | |||||
| Income taxes | - | - | |||||
| Net Loss | (923) | (1,514) | |||||
| Preferred stock dividends – unpaid and undeclared | (266) | (266) | |||||
| Net loss applicable to common stockholders | $ | (1,189) | $ | (1,780) | |||
| Basic and fully diluted net loss per common share | $ | (0.01) | $ | (0.02) | |||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 197,214,005 | 72,224,186 | |||||
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Net Sales | $ | 10,983 | 9,958 | |||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||
| Cost of revenues | 7,164 | 5,746 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization expense | 170 | 202 | ||||||
| Research and development | 1,243 | 934 | ||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | 2,800 | 2,782 | ||||||
| Total cost and expenses | $ | 11,377 | 9,664 | |||||
| Operating Income (Loss) | $ | (394 | ) | 294 | ||||
| Other Expenses | ||||||||
| Interest expense | 276 | 314 | ||||||
| Interest Income | - | (48 | ) | |||||
| Other expenses (income) | (75 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||
| Total other expenses | 201 | 221 | ||||||
| Income (loss )from operations before income taxes | $ | (595 | ) | 73 | ||||
| Income taxes (benefit) | 104 | 19 | ||||||
| Net Income (loss) | $ | (699 | ) | 54 | ||||
| Preferred dividend | (109 | ) | - | |||||
| Net Income (loss) to common stockholders | (808 | ) | 54 | |||||
| Statement of Comprehensive Income | ||||||||
| Net Income (loss) | (699 | ) | 54 | |||||
| Other Comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | (436 | ) | 168 | |||||
| Comprehensive income (loss) | (1,135 | ) | 222 | |||||
| Earnings Per Share | ||||||||
| Net income (loss) to common stockholders | (808 | ) | 54 | |||||
| Basic and diluted earnings per share | (0.04 | ) | 0.00 | |||||
| Weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding (after 1:100 reverse split) | 18,116,000 | 14,687,500 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
| Operating Activities: | |||||||
| Net loss | $ | (923) | $ | (1,514) | |||
| Depreciation | 74 | 213 | |||||
| Interest expense imputed upon related party advances | 97 | 231 | |||||
| Benefit derived from liquidation of subsidiaries | (149) | ||||||
| Gain on settlements of trade indebtedness | (214) | (554) | |||||
| Stock issued for compensation | 35 | 55 | |||||
| Stock issued to non employees for services | 41 | 128 | |||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||
| Accounts receivable | 123 | (129) | |||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 6 | (1) | |||||
| Accounts payable | (94) | 48 | |||||
| Accrued expenses | 506 | 838 | |||||
| Net cash used for operating activities | (498) | (685) | |||||
| Investing activities: | |||||||
| Proceeds from sale of equipment | — | 70 | |||||
| Net cash provided from investing activities | — | 70 | |||||
| Financing activities: | |||||||
| Sale of common stock | 300 | — | |||||
| Proceeds from related parties | 160 | 639 | |||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 460 | 639 | |||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (38) | 24 | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 39 | 15 | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 1 | $ | 39 | |||
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | |||||||
| Non-cash transaction during the year for: | |||||||
| Payment of accrued wages with common stock | $ | 35 | $ | 55 | |||
| Common stock issued for director fees payable | $ | 200 | $ | — | |||
| Conversion of related party debt to common stock | $ | 3,250 | $ | — | |||
| Common stock issued for services | $ | 41 | $ | 128 | |||
| Imputed interest recorded | $ | 97 | $ | 231 | |||
| Cash paid for interest | $ | - | $ | - | |||
| Cash paid for taxes | $ | - | $ | - | |||
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | ||||||||
| Net Income (loss) | $ | (699 | ) | $ | 54 | |||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash (used in) provided by operations | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 170 | 202 | ||||||
| Deferred taxes | 80 | (33 | ) | |||||
| Non-cash Interest | 2 | - | ||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts | (594 | ) | (141 | ) | ||||
| Inventories | 146 | (557 | ) | |||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 114 | 177 | ||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (110 | ) | (106 | ) | ||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | (891 | ) | (404 | ) | ||||
| Cash Flows from Investing activity: | ||||||||
| Purchase of Equipment | (463 | ) | (95 | ) | ||||
| Cash Acquired in Merger | 1 | - | ||||||
| Net cash provided from (used in) investing activities | (462 | ) | (95 | ) | ||||
| Cash Flows from Financing activities: | ||||||||
| Advances net of repayments on lines of credit | 40 | 644 | ||||||
| Proceeds from Sale of Common Stock | 1,979 | - | ||||||
| Term note repayments | (202 | ) | (210 | ) | ||||
| Repayment of related party advance | (10 | ) | ||||||
| Equity raise costs | (103 | ) | - | |||||
| Net cash provided by (used by) financing activities | 1,704 | 434 | ||||||
| Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | (196 | ) | 75 | |||||
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 155 | 10 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 75 | 65 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period | $ | 230 | $ | 75 | ||||
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||||||
| Cash paid for interest | $ | 276 | $ | 314 | ||||
| Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 124 | $ | - | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’Equity EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(Dollars in thousands)
| Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Additional | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Par Value $0.001 | Par Value $0.001 | Treasury Stock | Paid-In | Accumulated | Stockholders’ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Deficit | |||||||||||||||||
| January 1, 2012 | 373,555 | $ | 1,487 | 66,408,694 | $ | 66 | 19,209 | $ | (327) | $ | 93,005 | $ | (100,403) | $ | (6,172) | ||||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | — | (1,514) | (1,514) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued for services | — | 8,086,524 | 8 | — | 120 | — | 128 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest imputed on related party advances | — | — | — | 231 | — | 231 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued for compensation | — | 3,731,198 | 4 | — | 51 | — | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2012 | 373,355 | $ | 1,487 | 78,226,416 | $ | 78 | 19,209 | $ | (327) | $ | 93,407 | $ | (101,917) | $ | (7,272) | ||||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | — | (923) | (923) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Sale of common stock | — | 15,000,000 | 15 | — | 285 | — | 300 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued for settlement of related partydebt | — | 162,500,000 | 163 | — | 3,087 | — | 3,250 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued for services | — | 12,998,913 | 13 | — | 228 | — | 241 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest imputed on related party advances | — | — | — | 97 | — | 97 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued for compensation | — | 1,805,528 | 2 | — | 33 | — | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2013 | 373,355 | $ | 1,487 | 270,530,857 | $ | 271 | 19,209 | $ | (327) | $ | 97,137 | $ | (102,840) | $ | (4,272) | ||||||||||
| Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Additional | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Par Value $0.001 | Par Value $0.001 | Treasury Stock | Paid-In | Comprehensive | Stockholders’ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Retained Earnings | Income | Deficit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| January 1, 2013 | - | $ | - | 14,687,500 | $ | 15 | - | $ | - | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 2,283 | $ | 118 | $ | 2,401 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income | 169 | 169 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Income (loss) | 54 | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2013 | - | - | 14,687,500 | 15 | - | - | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 2,337 | $ | 287 | $ | 2,624 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Merger | 373,335 | 1,487 | 3,502,706 | 3 | (19,209 | ) | (327 | ) | 3,901 | - | - | 5,064 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sale of common stock | - | - | 1,237,125 | 1 | - | - | 1,978 | - | - | 1,979 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance costs | - | - | - | - | - | - | (103 | ) | - | - | (103 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Imputed interest | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Income (loss) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (699 | ) | (436 | ) | (1,135 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2014 | 373,335 | $ | 1,487 | 19,427,331 | $ | 19 | (19,209 | ) | $ | (327 | ) | $ | 5,763 | $ | 1,638 | $ | (149 | ) | $ | 8,431 | ||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular data in thousands, except per share amounts)
Note 1. | The Company and Basis of Presentation |
MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics, Inc. (“CCI”MDIT”, “CytoCore”“MEDITE” or the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware in December 1998.
These statements include the context otherwise requires, “CCI,” “CytoCore”accounts of MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics, Inc. (former CytoCore, Inc., the “Company,”“Company”, “we” and “our” refers to“us”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, which consists of MEDITE Enterprise, Inc., MEDITE GmbH, Burgdorf, Germany, MEDITE GmbH, Salzburg, Austria, MEDITE Lab Solutions Inc. (formerly MEDITE Inc.), Orlando, USA, MEDITE sp. z o.o., Zilona-Gora, Poland and CytoGlobe, GmbH, Burgdorf, Germany.
In April 2014, in a transaction more fully described in Footnote 3, the shareholders of the Company consummated a transaction in which 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of MEDITE Enterprise, Inc. were acquired by CytoCore, Inc. and our dormant subsidiaries and predecessors.
MEDITE is a medical technology company specializing in the development, engineering, manufacturing and marketing of premium medical devices and consumables for detection, risk assessment and diagnosis of cancer and related diseases. By acquiring MEDITE the company changed from solely research operations to an operating company with 76 employees in three countries, a distribution network to about 70 countries worldwide, a well-known and established brand name, a wide range of selling products and the established infrastructure necessary for a company acting in the medical industry.
Note 2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Principles Principle of Consolidation, Basis of Presentation and Significant Estimates
The accompanying consolidated financial statements included herewithhave been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned dormant subsidiaries. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In preparing the accompanying financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to makehas made certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date ofin the financial statements and disclosures of contingencies. Significant assumptions are required in the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.The most significant estimates pertain to apportionment factors used to allocate certain state franchise taxes and for the timingvaluation of the future paymentsallowance for doubtful accounts and inventory, valuation of accrued wages to determine payroll taxes payable.
Revenue Recognition
The Company derives its revenue primarily from product sales in accordance with
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investmentscash on deposit and highly-liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturityoriginal maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash and cash equivalents.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives. Principal useful lives areof the assets as follows:
| Buildings | ||
| Machinery and equipment | ||
| Office furniture and equipment | ||
| Vehicles | ||
| Computer equipment | 3-5 yrs |
Normal maintenance and repairs for property and equipment are charged to expense as incurred, while significant improvements are capitalized.
Licenses, Patents,
Research and TechnologyDevelopment
All research and purchased technology are recorded at their acquisition cost. Costs to prepare patent filingsdevelopment costs are expensed whenas incurred. CostsResearch and development costs consist of engineering, product development, testing, developing and validating the manufacturing process, and regulatory related costs.
Acquired In-Process Research and Development
Acquired in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) that the Company acquires through business combinations represents the fair value assigned to abandoned or denied patents are written offincomplete research projects which, at the time of abandonmentacquisition, have not reached technological feasibility. The amounts are capitalized and are accounted for as indefinite-lived intangible assets, subject to impairment testing until completion or denial. Amortization is begun asabandonment of the dateprojects. Upon successful completion of acquisition or uponeach project, Medite will make a determination as to the grantthen useful life of the final patent. Costsintangible asset, generally determined by the period in which the substantial majority of the cash flows are amortized over the asset’s useful life, which ranges from twoexpected to 17 years.be generated, and begin amortization. The Company assesses licenses, patents, and technology periodicallytests IPR&D for impairment.
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets Including Finite Lived Intangibles
At each balance sheet date or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, management of the Company evaluates the recoverability of such assets. An impairment loss is recognized if the amount of undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, in which case the asset is written down to fair value. The fair value of the asset is measured by either quoted market prices or the present value of estimated expected future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with the risks involved.
ResearchImpairment of Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets Other Than Goodwill
The Company has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and Development Costs
Goodwill
We allocate goodwill to reporting units based on the reporting unit expected to benefit from the business combination. We evaluate our reporting units on an annual basis. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis (December 31 for us) and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. These events or circumstances could include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, operating performance indicators, competition, or sale or disposition of a significant portion of its research activities under contractual arrangements with scientists, researchers, universities,a reporting unit. Unless events or circumstances have changed significantly, we generally do not re-test at year end assets acquired from a business combination in the year of acquisition.
Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assignment of assets and liabilities to reporting units, assignment of goodwill to reporting units, and determination of the fair value of each reporting unit. The fair value of each reporting unit is estimated using a discounted cash flow methodology. This analysis requires significant judgments, including estimation of future cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the long-term rate of growth for our business, estimation of the useful life over which cash flows will occur, and determination of our weighted average cost of capital.
The estimates used to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit change from year to year based on operating results, market conditions, and other independent third parties.
Stock Based Compensation
We follow the guidance of FASB ASC 718-10, which requires that share-based payments be reflected as an expense based upon the grant-date fair value of those awards. The expense is recognized over the remaining vesting periods of the awards, if any.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and notes payable approximate their respective fair values due to their short maturities.
Net Loss Per Share
Basic loss per share is calculated based on the weighted-average number of outstanding common shares. Diluted loss per share is calculated based on the weighted-average number of outstanding common shares plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares, using the treasury stock method. CCI’sMEDITE’s calculation of diluted net loss per share excludes potential common shares as of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 as the effect would be anti-dilutive (i.e. would reduce the loss per share).
In accordance with SEC Accounting Series Release 280, the Company computes its income or loss applicable to common stock holders by subtracting dividends on preferred stock, including undeclared or unpaid dividends if cumulative, from it reported net loss and reports the same on the face of its statement of operations.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of currently due plus deferred taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting carrying amounts and the respective tax bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured using tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are provided against deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The Company follows the guidance of FASB ASC 740-10 which relates to the Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with the accounting and reporting for uncertainty in income tax positions. This Interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model for financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns.
RisksLegal Fees Associated with Loss Contingencies
It is the Company’s policy to estimate and accrue for its potential legal fees at the time of loss when it incurs a loss contingency that will require the services of legal professionals. Changes over time to the estimate of total legal fees to be incurred are expensed at the time of the change in estimate.
Recasting of Certain Prior Period Information
During 2014, we changed our reporting to show depreciation and amortization as its own line item within our statement of operations and comprehensive income. We have updated the results from Concentrations
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In the first quarter of 2013, the Company adopted guidance issued byMay 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”)issued amended accounting guidance on revenue recognition that simplifies how an entity tests indefinite-lived intangibles for impairment.will be applied to all contracts with customers. The amended guidance allows companies to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to performobjective of the quantitative impairment test. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
| Note 3. | Reverse merger |
In January 2014, the Company and the owners of MEDITE Enterprise, Inc. entered into an agreement to merge with the former CytoCore, Inc. The merger required as a pre-requisite that among other items CytoCore settle certain outstanding payroll amounts in stock and that CytoCore complete a private placement with gross proceeds of a minimum of $2 million, which was later amended to $1.5 million. On April 3, 2014 CytoCore issued 697,234 shares of its common stock in satisfaction of approximately $1.61 million in outstanding accrued payroll. On April 4, 2014 the Company closed on a private placement in which it received gross proceeds of $1.529 million and issued 955,875 shares of its common stock. The merger closed on April 4, 2014 with the owners of MEDITE Enterprise, Inc. receiving 14,687,500 shares of the Company’s common stock plus up to an additional 312,500 shares issuable if certain conditions are met, in exchange for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012.100% of the issued and outstanding stock of MEDITE Enterprise, Inc. As of the date of these financial statements, the Company has not yet determined if the additional shares should be issued. The adoptionconsideration paid has been determined based the number of this guidance hadshares outstanding from the former CytoCore, Inc. of approximately 3,502,700 common shares at $1.60 per share (the same price per share in the concurrent private placement noted above).
Because the owners of MEDITE Enterprise, Inc. received approximately 81.1% of the then issued and outstanding stock of the Company, the merger has been treated as a reverse acquisition, in which for accounting purposes MEDITE Enterprise, Inc. acquired CytoCore, Inc. and therefore no impactpro forma information has been presented.
Under the purchase method of accounting, the Company assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective fair values as of the transaction date. In connection with the merger, the consideration paid, and the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, recorded at fair value on the Company’s financial positiondate of acquisition, are summarized in the following table:
| In thousands | ||||
| Net assets acquired | ||||
| Cash | $ | 1 | ||
| Other current assets | 12 | |||
| Property and equipment | 81 | |||
| Trade name /trademark | 1,240 | |||
| In-Process research and development | 4,620 | |||
| Goodwill | 2,453 | |||
| $ | 8,407 | |||
| Liabilities assumed | ||||
| Accounts payable & accrued expenses | $ | 3,220 | ||
| Related party advances | 102 | |||
| Loans payable | 21 | |||
| $ | 3,343 | |||
| Net identifiable assets/consideration paid | $ | 5,064 | ||
We are treating the fair value assigned to trade names/trademarks as indefinite lived intangibles. The in process research and results of operations.
The following is a summary of the components of inventories (in thousands):
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Raw materials | $ | 1,229 | $ | 1,748 | ||||
| Work in progress | 33 | 137 | ||||||
| Finished Goods | 2,153 | 2,068 | ||||||
| $ | 3,415 | $ | 3,953 | |||||
No amounts were reserved for scrap or obsolete inventory as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
| Note 5. | Property and Equipment |
The following is a summary of the followingcomponents of property and equipment as of (in thousands):
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Land | $ | 233 | $ | 244 | ||||
| Buildings | 1,291 | 1,352 | ||||||
| Machinery and equipment | 529 | 407 | ||||||
| Office furniture and equipment | 265 | 240 | ||||||
| Vehicles | 103 | 39 | ||||||
| Computer equipment | 110 | 86 | ||||||
| Construction in progress | 559 | 386 | ||||||
| Less: Accumulated depreciation | (999 | ) | (887 | ) | ||||
| $ | 2,091 | $ | 1,867 | |||||
| Note 6. | Bank Debts and Lines of Credit |
Our outstanding note payable indebtedness was as follows as of (in thousands):
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Hannoversche Volksbank credit line #1 | $ | 1,880 | $ | 2,092 | ||||
| Hannoversche Volksbank credit line #2 | 465 | 444 | ||||||
| Hannoversche Volksbank term loan #1 | 135 | 211 | ||||||
| Hannoversche Volksbank term loan #2 | 81 | 138 | ||||||
| Hannoversche Volksbank term loan #3 | 270 | 393 | ||||||
| Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. Promissory Note | 21 | - | ||||||
| Related party advances | 110 | - | ||||||
| DZ Equity Partners Participation rights | 912 | 1,032 | ||||||
| $ | 3,874 | $ | 4,310 | |||||
In July 2006, MEDITE GmbH, Burgdorf, entered into a master line of credit agreement #1 with Hannoversche Volksbank. The line of credit was amended in 2012 and was later amended to increase the credit limit to 1.8 million Euros. In January 2015, the master credit line was reduced to Euro 1.6 million and in March 2015 was to be reduced by a further Euro 500,000. The March 2015 reduction has been extended to May 31, 2015. The total credit line has a flexible use either as floating credit line with a variable interest rate of 8% per annum as of December 31, 2014, as “Eurocredit” fixed for one or more months with a short term fixed interest rate of 3.77% as of December 31, 2014 or as bank guarantee and for letters of credit in import business. The line of credit is collateralized by the accounts receivable and inventory of MEDITE GmbH, Burgdorf, a mortgage on the buildings owned by the Company and is guaranteed by Michaela Ott and Michael Ott, the former sole shareholders of the Company. At December 31, 2014 the Company had an unused and fully available credit line of Euro 150,000 with Hannoversche Volksbank.
In June 2012, CytoGlobe, GmbH, Burgdorf, entered into a line of credit agreement #2 with Hannoversche Volksbank. The line of credit granted a maximum borrowing authority of 400,000 Euros. The total credit line has a flexible use either as floating credit line with a variable interest rate of 8% per annum as of December 31, 2014, as “Eurocredit” fixed for one or more months with a short term fixed interest rate of 3.77% as of December 31, 2014 or as bank guarantee and for letters of credit in import business. The line of credit has no stated maturity date but may be cancelled by the bank upon notice to the Company. The line of credit is collateralized by the accounts receivable and inventory of CytoGlobe GmbH, Burgdorf and is guaranteed by Michaela Ott and Michael Ott, the former sole shareholders of the parent company and the state of Lower Saxony to support high-tech companies in the area.
In December 2006, MEDITE GmbH, Burgdorf, entered into a 500,000 Euro term loan agreement #1 with Hannoversche Volksbank with an interest rate of 3.4% per annum. The term loan has a maturity of September 2016 and requires semi-annual principal payments of approximately 27,780 euros each. The term loan is guaranteed by Michaela Ott and Michael Ott, the former sole stockholders of the Company and also a mortgage on the property of the Company.
In June 2006, MEDITE GmbH, Burgdorf, entered into a 400,000 Euro term loan #2 with Hannoversche Volksbank with an interest rate of 3.6 % per annum. The term loan has a maturity of June 2016, requires 18 semi-annual principal repayments of approximately 22,220 Euro each. The term loan is guaranteed by Michaela Ott and Michael Ott, the former sole stockholders of the Company and also has subordinated assignments of all of the receivables and inventories of MEDITE GmbH, Burgdorf and also has a subordinated pledge of stockholder term life insurance policies.
In November 2008, MEDITE GmbH, Burgdorf, entered into a 400,000 euro term loan #3 with Hannoversche Volksbank with a variable interest rate of approximately 4.7% per annum as of December 31, 2014. The term loan has a maturity of December 31, 2018, and requires quarterly principal repayments of 13,890 euro each. The term loan is guaranteed by the Ott’s and also includes a partial subordinated pledge of the receivables and inventory of MEDITE GmbH, Burgdorf.
In March 2009, the Company entered into a participation rights agreement in the form of a debenture which a mezzanine lender agreed to advance the Company up to 1.5 million euros in two tranches of 750,000 euros each. The first tranche was paid to the Company at closing with the second tranche being conditioned on MEDITE GmbH, Burgdorf and its subsidiaries hitting certain performance targets. Those targets were not met and the second tranche was never called. The debenture pays interest at the rate of 12.15% per annum and matures at December 31:
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||
| Furniture and fixtures | $ | 40 | $ | 47 | |||
| Laboratory equipment | 508 | 508 | |||||
| Computer and communications equipment | 261 | 261 | |||||
| Design and tooling | 1,204 | 1,204 | |||||
| 2,013 | 2,020 | ||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (2,008) | (1,941) | |||||
| Total | $ | 5 | $ | 79 | |||
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, depreciation expense2014 the remaining balance of approximately $21,000 on the note payable to Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. was $74,000 and $213,000, respectively.in default, however, on February 23, 2015, The Company did not allocate anyreached an agreement with Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. whereby both parties have agreed that Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. accept $38,281 as payment in full for all outstanding principal and accrued interest. As part of this agreement Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. has agreed to convert $1.75 million stated value of Series D Preferred stock and all outstanding accrued dividends of $656,250 for 12,000 shares of the depreciation expensecompany common stock. Prior to the execution of this agreement the company had failed to make principal and interest payments when due and is in breach of certain warranties and representations under the notes included above.
At the time of the machinerymerger, the Company owed its then CEO and equipment orChairman of the designBoard for prior advances of approximately $121,700. During 2014, the Company had re-paid $10,000 and tooling into inventory as there was no manufacturing. This depreciation was included as a selling, general and administrative expense as excess idle time.
The following table summarizes the maturities of the Company’s outstanding long-term indebtedness, at December 31, 2014 over the following five years (in thousands):
| Year | ||||
| 2015 | $ | 189 | ||
| 2016 | 1,074 | |||
| 2017 | 68 | |||
| 2018 | 67 | |||
| 2019 | - | |||
| Total | $ | 1,398 | ||
| Note 7. | Accrued Expenses |
Accrued expenses include the following at December 31:
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||
| Accrued interest | $ | 30 | $ | 65 | |||
| Accrued taxes | 328 | 484 | |||||
| Accrued compensation for Directors | 40 | 190 | |||||
| Other accrued expenses | 139 | 164 | |||||
| Total | $ | 537 | $ | 903 | |||
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Accrued taxes and withholdings | $ | 445 | 211 | |||||
| Accrued warranty reserve | 46 | 98 | ||||||
| Accrued wages | 2,064 | 57 | ||||||
| Other accrued expenses | 623 | 120 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 3,178 | $ | 486 | ||||
Note 8. |
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||
| Xillix Technologies Corporation, $361,000 Promissory Note issued June 26, 1998; interest rate Canadian Prime plus 6% per annum; represents a debt of AccuMed; due December 27, 1999 | — | 34 | |||||
| Robert Shaw, $25,000 Promissory Note issued September 20, 2001; interest rate 9% per annum | 15 | 15 | |||||
| Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., $62,946 Promissory Note issued November 30, 2003; due December 31, 2003; interest at 8% per annum payable after December 31, 2003 | 21 | 21 | |||||
| $ | 36 | $ | 70 | ||||
In February 2015, the Company liquidated AccuMed, its wholly owned subsidiary. Asreceived approval for and affected a result, the note and accrued interest totaling $73,000 due to Xillex Technologies Corporation was recorded as a reduction in selling, general and administration expense.
Earnings (loss) per share
A reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator used in the calculation of earnings (loss) per share is as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
| Basic and Diluted: | |||||||
| Reported net loss (in thousands) | $ | (923) | $ | (1,514) | |||
| Less unpaid and undeclared preferred stock dividends | (266) | (266) | |||||
| Net loss applicable to common stockholder | $ | (1,189) | $ | (1,780) | |||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 197,214,005 | 74,224,186 | |||||
| Net loss per common share | $ | (0.01) | $ | (0.02) | |||
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Basic and Diluted: | ||||||||
| Reported net loss (in thousands) | $ | (699 | ) | $ | 54 | |||
| Less unpaid and undeclared preferred stock dividends | (109 | ) | - | |||||
| Net loss applicable to common stockholder | $ | (808 | ) | $ | 54 | |||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding | 18,116,000 | 14,687,500 | ||||||
| Net income (loss) per common share | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.00 | |||
Because the following instruments would be anti-dilutive at all times presented, the potentially issuable common stock from warrants to purchase39,000 142,308 and922,667 39 shares in 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively and preferred stock convertible into634,586 and604,214 shares for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, of 4,991 and 2012,4,738 common shares respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share applicable to common stockholders, as they are anti-dilutive as a result of net losses for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
Preferred Stock
A summary of the Company’s preferred stock as of December 31 is as follows:
| Shares Issued & | Preferred Stock Dividends | ||||||||||
| Shares | Outstanding | Undeclared and Unpaid | |||||||||
| Offering | Authorized | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
| Series A convertible | 590,197 | 47,250 | 47,250 | — | — | ||||||
| Series B convertible, 10% cumulative | 1,500,000 | 93,750 | 93,750 | 37,500 | 37,500 | ||||||
| Series C convertible, 10% cumulative | 1,666,666 | 38,333 | 38,333 | 11,500 | 11,500 | ||||||
| Series D convertible, 10% cumulative | 300,000 | 175,000 | 175,000 | 175,000 | 175,000 | ||||||
| Series E convertible, 10% cumulative | 800,000 | 19,022 | 19,022 | 42,000 | 42,000 | ||||||
| Undesignated Preferred Series | 5,143,137 | — | — | — | — | ||||||
| Total Preferred Stock | 10,000,000 | 373,355 | 373,355 | 266,000 | 266,000 | ||||||
| Shares Issued & | Preferred Stock Dividends | |||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Outstanding | Undeclared and Unpaid | ||||||||||||||||||
| Offering | Authorized | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
| Series A convertible | 590,197 | 47,250 | 47,250 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Series B convertible, 10% cumulative | 1,500,000 | 93,750 | 93,750 | 28,125 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Series C convertible, 10% cumulative | 1,666,666 | 38,333 | 38,333 | 8,625 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Series D convertible, 10% cumulative | 300,000 | 175,000 | 175,000 | 41,250 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Series E convertible, 10% cumulative | 800,000 | 19,022 | 19,022 | 31,500 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Undesignated Preferred Series | 5,143,137 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total Preferred Stock | 10,000,000 | 373,355 | 373,355 | 109,500 | — | |||||||||||||||
The undeclared and unpaid preferred stock dividends were calculated from the date of the merger through December 31, 2014.
Summary of Preferred Stock Terms
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
| Liquidation Value: | $4.50 per share, $212,625 |
| Conversion Price: | $ |
| Conversion Rate: | |
| Voting Rights: | None |
| Dividends: | None |
| Conversion Period: | Any time |
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
| Liquidation Value: | $4.00 per share, $375,000 |
| Conversion Price: | $ |
| Conversion Rate: | |
| Voting Rights: | None |
| Dividends: | 10%—Quarterly—Commencing March 31, 2001 |
| Conversion Period: | Any time |
Cumulative dividends in arrears at December 31, 20132014 were $482,000
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
| Liquidation Value: | $3.00 per share, $115,000 |
| Conversion Price: | $ |
| Conversion Rate: | |
| Voting Rights: | None |
| Dividends: | 10%—Quarterly—Commencing March 31, 2002 |
| Conversion Period: | Any time |
Cumulative dividends in arrears at December 31, 20132014 were $140,000
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock
| Liquidation Value: | $ |
| Conversion Price: | $ |
| Conversion Rate: | |
| Voting Rights: | None |
| Dividends: | 10%—Quarterly—Commencing April 30, 2002 |
| Conversion Period: | Any time |
Cumulative dividends in arrears at December 31, 20132014 were $629,400
Series E Convertible Preferred Stock
| Liquidation Value: | $22.00 per share, $418,488 |
| Conversion Price: | $ |
| Conversion Rate: | |
| Voting Rights: | Equal in all respects to holders of common shares |
| Dividends: | 10%—Quarterly—Commencing May 31, 2002 |
| Conversion Period: | Any time |
Cumulative dividends in arrears at December 31, 20132014 were $512,000
Issuance of Securities
Common Stock
Issuance of Common Stock for Cash
During 2014, the quarter ended December 31, 2013,company issued 1,237,125 shares for $1,979,400 in equity proceeds emanating from the Company issued1,000,000 sharessale of restricted, unregistered common stock to a qualified investor for $20,000, or $0.02associated with two private placements (PIPE) “Private Placement in Public Entity” at $1.60 per share.
Our officers and directors own an aggregate199,199,145 16,661,615 shares of common stock which is73.64 approximately 86 % of our outstanding common stock.
The Company does not have any outstanding stock options.
Warrants outstanding
| Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
| Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
| Average | Aggregate | Remaining | ||||||||||||||
| Options and | Exercise | Intrinsic | Contractual | |||||||||||||
| Warrants | Price | Value | Life (Years) | |||||||||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2012 | — | $ | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| Granted | — | $ | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| Exercised | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Expired | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2013 | — | $ | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| Outstanding as result of the merger | 62,140 | 4.00 | — | 9.00 | ||||||||||||
| Granted | 81,298 | 1.60 | — | 4.50 | ||||||||||||
| Expired | (130 | ) | 4.00 | — | — | |||||||||||
| Outstanding at December 31. 2014 | 143,308 | $ | 2.64 | — | 6.46 | |||||||||||
| Note9. | Leases |
The terms of December 31, 2013, we have a totalour current facilities leases vary from 3 months’ notice for part of4,863,194 shares of common stock issuable from the currentGerman and prior periods.
| Total Warrant | Warrant Shares | Exercise Price | Weighted Average | |||||
| Shares Outstanding | Exercisable | (not weighted) | Years until Expiration | |||||
| 39,000 | 39,000 | $ | 0.01 | 1.50 | ||||
| Weighted | ||||||||||
| Weighted | Average | |||||||||
| Average | Aggregate | Remaining | ||||||||
| Options and | Exercise | Intrinsic | Contractual | |||||||
| Warrants | Price | Value | Life (Years) | |||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2011 | 39,000 | $ | 0.08 | — | ||||||
| Granted | 13,000 | $ | 0..01 | — | ||||||
| Exercised | — | |||||||||
| Forfeited | (13,000) | |||||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2012 | 39,000 | $ | 0.01 | — | ||||||
| Granted | 11,000 | $ | 0.01 | |||||||
| Exercised | — | |||||||||
| Forfeited | (11,000) | |||||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2013 | 39,000 | $ | 0.01 | — | 1.50 | |||||
Future minimum annual lease paymentsobligations under these leases as of December 31, 20122014 are:
| Operating | ||||
| Year | Leases | |||
| (in thousands) | ||||
| 2014 | $ | 51 | ||
| 2015 | 53 | |||
| 2016 | 45 | |||
| 2017 | — | |||
| 2018 | — | |||
| Total | $ | 149 |
| Operating | ||||
| Year | Leases | |||
| (in thousands) | ||||
| 2015 | $ | 112 | ||
| 2016 | 72 | |||
| 2017 | 33 | |||
| 2018 | 18 | |||
| 2019 | ||||
| Total | $ | 235 | ||
Note | Income Taxes |
The provision for income taxes consists of the following for the years ended December 31 :
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
| Federal | $ | — | $ | — | |||
| State and local | — | — | |||||
| Foreign | — | — | |||||
| Total income tax expense | $ | — | $ | — | |||
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||
| Current | — | — | |||
| Deferred | — | — | |||
| Total Income Tax Expense | — | — |
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Federal | $ | 129 | $ | 19 | ||||
| State and local | — | — | ||||||
| Foreign | (25 | ) | — | |||||
| Total income tax expense | $ | 104 | $ | 19 | ||||
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Current | 152 | 51 | ||||||
| Deferred | (48 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||
| Total Income Tax Expense | 104 | 19 | ||||||
At December 31, 2013, Medite had a deferred tax asset on the books of its US subsidiary of approximately $129,000, mostly as a result of prior year net operating loss carryforwards. Upon the consummation of the merger, the Company determined that the deferred tax asset had to be allowed for due to the subsidiary now be consolidated with the former CytoCore for income tax reporting purposes in the United States. The effect was to increase current year income tax expense by $129,000.
For the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the provision for income taxes differs from the expected tax provision computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate to income before taxes as a result of the following:
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||
| Statutory U.S. federal rate | (34.0) | % | (34.0) | % | |
| Permanent differences | — | — | |||
| Valuation allowance | 34.0 | % | 34.0 | % | |
| Provision for income tax expense(benefit) | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % |
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| Statutory U.S. federal rate | (35.0 | )% | 25.0 | % | ||||
| Permanent differences | — | — | ||||||
| Change in estimate of German tax rates | (10 | )% | — | |||||
| Application of valuation allowance to US deferred tax assets upon merger | 18 | % | — | |||||
| Other | — | — | ||||||
| Valuation allowance | 44.0 | % | — | % | ||||
| Provision for income tax expense(benefit) | 17 | % | 25 | % | ||||
The significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
| 2013 | 2012 | ||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||
| Deferred Tax Assets: | |||||||
| Net Operating Loss Carryforwards | $ | 30,317 | $ | 30,288 | |||
| Non-cash compensation | 1,250 | 1,043 | |||||
| Writedown of intangibles | 63 | 63 | |||||
| Accrued Liabilities | 86 | 71 | |||||
| Total Deferred Tax Assets | 31,716 | 31,465 | |||||
| Deferred Tax Liabilities: | |||||||
| Total Deferred Tax Liabilities | — | — | |||||
| Net Deferred Tax Asset | 31,716 | 31,465 | |||||
| Valuation Allowance | (31,716) | (31,465) | |||||
| Net Deferred Tax Asset | $ | — | $ | — | |||
| 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Deferred Tax Assets: | ||||||||
| Net Operating Loss Carryforwards | $ | 24,500 | 129 | |||||
| Accounts receivable timing differences | 115 | 156 | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 93 | |||||||
| Total Deferred Tax Assets | 24,708 | 285 | ||||||
| Deferred Tax Liabilities: | ||||||||
| Inventory Adjustment | - | (16 | ) | |||||
| Other | (39 | ) | - | |||||
| Total Deferred Tax Liabilities | (39 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||
| Net Deferred Tax Asset | 24,669 | 269 | ||||||
| Valuation Allowance | (24,500 | ) | - | |||||
| Net Deferred Tax Asset | $ | 169 | 269 | |||||
At December 31, 2013
For financial reporting purposes, the entire amount of deferred tax assets related principally to the net operating loss carry forwards has been offset by a valuation allowance due to uncertainty regarding the realization of the assets. The valuation allowance increased by approximately $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31,
In 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Tax Uncertainties
The Company follows the provisions of FASC 740-10 in accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. This guidance prescribes recognition and measurement parameters for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the Company’s tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
The Company has analyzed filing positions in all of the federal and state jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as open tax years in these jurisdictions. The periods subject to examination for the Company’s tax returns are for the years 2010, 20112012, 2012 and 2012.2013. The Company believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions would be sustained on audit and does not anticipate any adjustments that would result in a material change to its financial position. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits (in millions)thousands):
| Amount | ||||
| Gross Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, | $ | — | ||
| Increases in tax positions for current year | — | |||
| Settlements | — | |||
| Lapse in statute of limitations | — | |||
| Gross Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, | $ | — | ||
The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax including state and local jurisdictions. Currently, no federal or state income tax returns are under examination by the respective taxing jurisdictions.
The Company’s accounting policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The Company has not accrued interest for any periods.
Note | Commitments and contingencies |
Legal Proceedings
Settled in 2013
None
Pending as of December 31, 2013
In 2014, we became subject to a number of other proceedings, informal demands, or debt for serviceslawsuit brought by D&D Technologies, Inc. (“D&D”) in the state of New Jersey for breach of contract and breach of implied covenant of good faith that occurred in 2013 and prior by the former unsecured creditorsCytoCore for failure to collectpay for past due amounts forcontractual services. CCIThe original complaint was dismissed and then refiled by D&D. D&D is attemptingseeking damages over $86,000 plus equitable relief. In 2015, the Company and D&D engaged in settlement negotiations and at the time of this filing had verbally agreed to settle these demandsthe matter for approximately $15,000, however, no formal written settlement has yet been entered into.
CytoGlobe is subject to a court settlement on an alleged breach of the German competition law with Hologic Deutschland GmbH from August 2013. Both parties appealed the district court verdict at the higher regional court in September 2013, however at this time, the court has not schedule any further action and unfilled claims. CCIuntil such time as it does, not consider anythe matter is at a standstill. As part of these claims to be material.
Other Commitments
As a result of cash constraints experienced by the Company,former CytoCore, the Illinois Franchise Taxes due for the year 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 have not been filed or paid. CCIThe Company believes that it has made adequate provision for the liability including penalties and interest.
| Note12. | Segment Information |
The Company operates in one operating segment. However, the Company was advanced $639,000 from related parties. These advance are payable upon demandhas assets and are non-interest bearing.
| United States | Germany | Poland | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 9,387 | $ | 811 | $ | 6,989 | $ | 7,359 | $ | 63 | $ | - | ||||||||||||
| Property & equipment, net | 98 | 17 | 1,985 | 1,850 | 8 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
| Intangible Assets | 8,315 | 2 | 58 | 63 | 4 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | 1,349 | 673 | 9,633 | 9,285 | 1 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | (730 | ) | (20 | ) | 76 | 74 | (45 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||
Note | Subsequent Event |
During 2015, the company issued 240,625 shares of unregistered stock to qualified individuals under SEC Rule 144 at $1.60 for proceeds of $385,000.
On January 11, 2014, the “Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”)February 23, 2015, The Company reached an agreement with Medite Enterprises,Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Medite”), Medite GMBH, a corporation organized under the laws whereby both parties have agreed that Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. accept $38,281 as payment in full for all outstanding principal and accrued interest. As part of Germanythis agreement Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. has agreed to convert $1.75 million stated value of Series D Preferred stock and wholly owned by Medite (the “Subsidiary”), and the sole shareholdersall outstanding accrued dividends of Medite (collectively, the “Shareholders”).
To date the Company for certain losses during the one year period following the closing. In connectionhas reached a verbal settlement regarding outstanding litigation with such indemnification rights, the Agreement provides that375,000,000 of the Shares will be deposited with the Company and heldD&D Technology which calls for a periodfinal payment of 12 months$15,000 by MEDITE to cover certain indemnification claims thatD&D Technology, the Company may have against the Shareholders.