Index to Financial Statements

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM10-K

(Mark One)

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year EndedDecember 31, 20142017

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________________ to __________________

Commission file number:001-36379

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

ENERGOUS CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware

 

46-1318953

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3590 North First Street, Suite 210, San Jose, CA 95134
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(408)963-0200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes¨   ☐    Nox

  ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes¨  ☐    Nox

  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yesx  ☒    No¨

  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yesx  ☒    No¨

  ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of RegulationS-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant'sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K.¨  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filer¨                  ☒
Non-accelerated filer¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting companyx ☐
Emerging growth company ☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Act):    Yes¨  ☐    Nox

  ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting andnon-voting common equity held bynon-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter ($15.12) was $99,383,907.$288,974,313. Solely for the purposes of this calculation, shares held by directors, executive officers and 10% owners of the registrant have been excluded. Such exclusion should not be deemed a determination or an admission by the registrant that such individuals are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant.

As of March 30, 2015,2, 2018, there were 12,796,50225,155,547 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The registrant intends to file a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.2017. Portions of such proxy statement are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-10-K.K.

 

 


Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I

1

Item 1. Business

1

Item 1A. Risk Factors

911

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

2024

Item 2. Properties

2024

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

2024

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

2024

PART II

2125

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

2125

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

2125

Item 7.  Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

2126

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.Risk

2732

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.Data

2733

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

2861

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.Procedures

2861

Item 9B. Other Information.

2962

PART III

3065

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

3065

Item 11. Executive Compensation

3065

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters.

3065

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

3065

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

3065

PART IV

3165

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules

31

65 


Index to Financial Statements

PART I

As used in this Annual Report on Form10-K, unless the context otherwise requires the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Energous” refer to Energous Corporation, a Delaware corporation.

FORWARD LOOKINGFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are intended to be covered by the “safe harbor” created by those sections. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terms such as “believe,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “seek,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “anticipate” or other comparable terms. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding our strategies, prospects, financial condition, operations, costs, plans and objectives are forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among others, statements we make regarding proposed services,business strategy; market opportunitiesopportunities; expectations for current and acceptance,potential business relationships; expectations for revenues, cash flows and financial performance, intentions for the futureperformance; and the anticipated results of ourresearch and development efforts. Forward-lookingThese forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based only on our current beliefs, expectationsinformation and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans and strategies, projections, anticipated events and trends, the economy and other future conditions.beliefs. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predictunpredictable and many of which are outside of our control. Our actualActual results and financial condition may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Therefore,what is anticipated, so you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial conditionoutcomes to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements include, among others, the following: our ability to develop a commercially feasible technology; receipt of necessary regulatory approval; our ability to find and maintain development partners, market acceptance of our technology, the amount and nature oftechnology; competition in our industry; our ability to protectprotection of our intellectual property; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Item 1. Business

Overview

We are developinghave developed a technology called WattUp®that can enable wire-freeconsists of proprietary semiconductor chipsets, software, hardware designs and antennas that enables radio frequency (“RF”) based charging for electronic devices, that provides power at a distanceproviding wire-free charging solutions for contact-based charging andat-a-distance charging, ultimately enabling charging with complete mobility under full software control. Our ultimate goal isPursuant to license our WattUpTM technology to deviceStrategic Alliance Agreement with Dialog Semiconductor plc (“Dialog”), Dialog manufactures and chip manufacturers, wireless service providers and other commercial partners to makedistributes integrated circuit (“IC”) products incorporating ourRF-based wire-free charging an affordable, ubiquitous and convenient service offeringtechnology. Dialog is our exclusive supplier of these ICs for end users.the general market. We believe our proprietary technology can potentially be utilized in a variety of devices, including smart phones,wearables, hearing aids, earbuds, Bluetooth headsets, Internet of Things (“IoT”) devices, smartphones, tablets,e-book readers, wearables, keyboards, mice, remote controls, rechargeable lights, cylindrical batteries, medical devices and any other device with similar charging requirements that would otherwise need a battery or a connection to a power outlet.

We believe our technology is novel in its approach, in that itwe are developing a solution that charges electronic devices by surrounding them with a three dimensional (“3D”)focused, radio frequency (“RF”)energy pocket (“RF energy pocket”). We are developingengineering solutions that we expect to enable the wire-free transmission of energy from multiple transmittersfor contact-based applications as well as far field applications of up to multiple receivers connected15 feet. We are also developing our Far Field transmitter

Index to Financial Statements

technology to seamlessly mesh (like a network ofWi-Fi routers) to form a wire-free charging network that will allow users to charge their devices as they move fromroom-to-roomor integrated into electronic devices, withthroughout a range of fifteen (15) feet in radius or in a circular charging envelope of thirty (30) feet. Welarge space. To date, we have developed multiple prototype systemstransmitter prototypes in various form factors and power capabilities. We have also developed multiple receiver prototypes, including smartphone battery cases, toys, fitness trackers, Bluetooth headsets and tracking devices, as well as stand-alone receivers. We are also in the pre-production stage leading to mass production with early adopters of the WattUp technology to bring the first contact-based transmitters and compatible receivers to market.

When the company was founded, we recognized the need to build and design an enterprise-class network management and control software (“NMS”) system that was integral to the architecture and development of our wire-free charging technology. Our NMS system can be scaled up to control an enterprise consisting of singlethousands of devices or scaled down to work in a home or IoT environment.

The power, distance and multiple transmittersmobility capabilities of the WattUp technology were validated by an internationally recognized independent testing lab in various forms and sizes, multiple smart phone receiver cases, various other forms of receiving devices and management software. We have validated the technology in our laboratories, however our technology is not yet optimized and may be too large or too expensive to be incorporated into commercially marketed products.October 2015.

Our technology solution consists principally of transmitter and receiver application specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”)ICs and novel antenna designs driven through innovative algorithms and software applications. We aresubmitted our first IC design for wafer fabrication in November 2013 and have since been developing multiple generations of transmitter and receiver ASICs,ICs, multiple antenna designs, as well as algorithms and software designs that we believe, in the aggregate, will optimize our technology by reducing size and cost, while increasing performance to a level that we believe will allow forenable our technology to be integrated into low-power devices (thata broad spectrum of devices. We have developed a “building block” approach which allows us to scale our product implementations by combining multiple transmitter building blocks and/or multiple receiver building blocks to provide the power, distance, size and cost performance necessary to meet application requirements. While the technology is very scalable, in order to provide the necessary strategic focus to grow the company effectively, we have defined our market as devices requiringthat require 10 watts or less than 10 watts), thereby eliminating the need for a charging cord or padof power to maintain a charge. We submitted our first ASIC design for wafer fabrication in November 2013. Since then, we have continued to improve on our ASIC developments and we expectintend to continue investingto invest in this area. We are also developing what we believe will be an enterprise class management and control system for our WattUp solution that will incorporate cloud based network managementIC development as well as in the necessary local interfaceother components of the WattUp system to improve product performance, efficiency, cost-performance and control forminiaturization as required to grow the transmitterbusiness and receiver.

expand the ecosystem, while also distancing us from any potential competitors.

We believe that if our development, regulatory and commercialization efforts are successful, our transmitter and receiver technology will support a broad spectrum of charging solutions will initially be ableranging from contact-based charging or charging at distances of a few millimeters (“near field”) to simultaneously chargecharging at distances of up to 12 mobile15 feet (“far field”).

In February 2015, we signed a Development and License Agreement with one of the top consumer electronic companies in the world based on total worldwide revenues. The agreement is milestone-based and while there are no guarantees that the WattUp® technology will ever be integrated into our strategic partner’s consumer devices, at varying charging levels, dependingwe continue to progress the relationship as evidenced by our 2017 revenues from engineering services resulting from the achievement of certain milestones under the agreement. We anticipate continued progress with the relationship, which we expect will result in additional engineering services revenue and ultimately, if our technology is incorporated into one or more products by our strategic partner, potentially significant revenues based on the number of devices, with a range of fifteen (15) feetWattUp® technology being integrated into products shipped to consumers.

In February 2016, we began delivering evaluation kits to potential licensees to allow their respective engineering and product management departments to test and evaluate our technology. We expect that the testing and evaluations currently taking place will lead to products beginning to be shipped to consumers in radius or in a circular charging envelope of thirty (30) feet. Subsequent development efforts will focus on increasing the power delivery capability, increasing distance, enhancing the management and control solution and lowering overall system cost.2018.

As part of our commercialization efforts, in May 2014 we executed our first of 16 joint development agreements with strategic partners which provide for the exchange of technology and which serve to describe the integration of our technology into the strategic partners’ products. At the 2015 Consumer Electronics Show in January, we met with over 100 existing or new potential joint development partners and investors and demonstrated whole house charging coverage through the use of WattUp technology through multiple transmitters packaged in a variety of consumer friendly form factors, including televisions, bed-side units, sound bars, wall units and speakers. It is our objective during the first and second quarter of 2015 to narrow our research and development efforts to strategic partners whose goals, capabilities and commercialization potential most closely aligns with ours. Accordingly, in January 2015,In November 2016, we entered into a funded product developmentStrategic Alliance Agreement with Dialog, pursuant to which Dialog manufactures and licensing agreement with a tier-one consumer electronics company.distributes IC products incorporating our wire-free charging technology. Dialog is our exclusive supplier of these products for the general market. Our WattUp technology will often use Dialog’s SmartBond® Bluetooth low energy solution as theout-of-band communications channel between the wireless transmitter and receiver. In most cases, Dialog’s power management technology will then be used to distribute

Index to Financial Statements

power from the WattUp receiver IC to the rest of the device while Dialog’s AC/DC Rapid Charge™ power conversion technology delivers power to the wireless transmitter.

We have pursued an aggressiveOur intellectual property strategy and are developingincludes pursuing patent protection for new patents.innovations. As of December 31, 2014,March 2, 2018, we had in excess of 125more than 170 pending U.S. patent and provisional patent applications. As of that date, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and international patent offices had issued 77 patents and had notified us of the allowance of 50 additional patents. In addition to the inventions covered by these patents and patent applications, we have also identified a significant number of additional specific inventions that we believe may beare novel and patentable. We intend to file for patent protection for the most valuable of these, as well asand for other new inventions that we expect to develop. Our strategy is to continually monitor the costs and benefits of each patent application and pursue those that we expect will best protect our business.

business and expand the core value of the Company.

We have recruited and hired a seasoned management team with both private and public company experience and relevant industry experience to develop and execute our operating plan. In addition, we have identified and hired additionalkey engineering resources in the areas of IC development, antenna development, hardware, software and firmware engineering as well as integration and testing which we expect will build upallow us to continue to expand our technology and intellectual property as well as meet the engineering capabilitysupport requirements of our internal team.

licensees.

Our common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ CapitalThe Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol “WATT”. As of December 31, 2014,March 2, 2018, we had 3668 full-time employees.employees, 60 of which were engineers. We were incorporated in Delaware in October 2012. Our corporate headquarters is located at 3590 North First Street, Suite 210, San Jose, CA 95134. Our website can be accessed atwww.energous.com. www.energous.com. The information contained on, or that may be obtained from our website, is not, and shall not be deemed to be, part of this Annual Report on Form10-K.

Index to Financial Statements

Our Technology

The wire-free charging solution we are developing employs 3D “pocketforming” via a transmitter technology that creates a targeted RF energy pocket in a room around a receiving device (which may be mobile(mobile or fixed).

Figure 1 below shows a simplebasic diagram of our solution. Today this solution is able to send wattageRF energy from the transmitter to individual receiver devices in our laboratory.single or multiple devices.

Figure 1: Our Wire-freeWire-Free Charging Solution Diagram

 

First, our proprietary transmitter locates the client receiver(s) in a 3-dimensional space via technology we have developed using standard Bluetooth technology.® communications. Next, the transmitter, through software control, generates a proprietary RF waveformcontrolled and focusedRF-waveform to create an RF energy pocket around the client receiver(s). We expect that client company receivers,Receiver(s) equipped with our antennas and ASICs,ICs, and drivencontrolled by our software, will beare able to gatherharvest power from this focused RF energy pocket. We believe that these client receivers will be incorporated into rechargeable-batteryvarious devices such as smart phones cases with embedded batteries, smart phones,smartphones, wearables, fitness trackers, keyboards and mice, cameras, tablets, e-book readers, keyboards, mice,toys, IoT devices, sensors, remote controls, rechargeable lights or anymedical devices and other device with similar charging requirements that would otherwise need a battery or a connection to a power outlet.

small electronics which contain embedded batteries.

Our transmitter uses proprietary software algorithms to dynamically direct, focus and control our proprietary RF waveform in three dimensions as it transmits energy to a moving object (such as a user holding their mobile phone indevice as they walk around a user’s pocket)room).

Figure 2 below depicts the front and back of a smart phone case that integrates our receiver technology and will, if used with our transmitter within the appropriate range, wirelessly charge a smart phone.

Figure 2: Front and Back of our Prototype Smart Phone Case with Embedded Energous Receiver Technology

Our initial demonstration system was able to output wattagetransmit energy to multiple devices withwithin a rangeradius of fifteen (15) feet in radius or in a circular charging envelope of thirty (30) feet and in real-time was able to refocus the RF pocket.15 feet. We believe our ASICscurrent generation ICs and those in development will also allow us to significantly reduce the size and cost of both our transmitter costs, while achieving highertransmitters and our receivers, and to increase delivered power and efficiency and faster synchronizing speeds.synchronization.

Index to Financial Statements

We submittedIn January 2016, we announced a new Miniature WattUp Near Field Transmitter (now called WattUp Near Field Transmitter Technology) and a small form factor receiver, both of which were developed as a direct result of our first ASIC designefforts to reduce cost and size. The WattUp Near Field Transmitter Technology offers contact-based charging, for wafer fabrication in November 2013. Since then,which we have submitted additionalreceived FCC approval, that allows for low power charging at up to five millimeter distances. Due to its low cost and small size, the miniature transmitter is anticipated to be bundledin-box with WattUp receiver enabled devices, replacing alternative charging solutions like power adapters and charging cables. The ability to provide a low cost, portable charging solution for receiver ASIC designsdevices established portability for the WattUp solution, and we expect it to accelerate the adoption of our wafer fabricator for production. Twotechnology. In 2017, we announced the High-Power version of these ASICs were usedthe WattUp nearfield transmitter that will have the ability to demonstrate our WattUp technology in prototypical consumer products in conjunction with our strategic partnerschange on contact at the Consumer Electronics Show in January 2015. Additional ASICs are under development and twolevels of these ASICs have entered the fabrication stage.

up to 10 watts.

Our Competition

There are numerousmany existing widelyand commercially available methods to provide power to rechargeable low-power fixed and mobilefor charging battery-powered devices, including wallplug-in recharging, charging, inductive recharging, power-mat recharging, battery rechargingcharging, magnetic resonance charging, charging stations and more. To our knowledge, almost all mobile consumer electronic devices equipped with a rechargeable battery come bundled with a method to rechargecharge the device (for example, a power cord). We are depending onStudies indicate that the development of aconsumer has grown tired and frustrated with tethered charging solutions and that the market thatis poised and will sufficiently value the convenience ofbe receptive to untethered wire-free recharging to pay the additional cost to purchasepower solutions like our wire-free charging solutions.

WattUp technology. We believe that the main advantagepositive market response and interest in the WattUp technology we have seen suggests that consumer electronic companies that develop products incorporating our technology will generate incremental sales and realize highly differentiated competitive advantages.

We believe our WattUp technology has a number of our wire-free charging technology, asadvantages compared to traditional charging technologies will be the ability to charge multiple devices anywhere within the charging area (expected to be a spanin terms of up to 30 feet) without the use of a charging pad. We believeproduct spectrum, distance, size, cost, mobility, foreign object detection and portability. Further, our technology is unique and flexible allowingallows us to target a fixed or mobile device and track that device if it moves, or is moving, and focus and transmit pockets offocused energy to the targeted device to charge the device without having to remove the battery or plug in the device. However, there are a

A variety of other wireless charging technologies are on the market or under development today. These competitive technologies fall into the following categories:

Magnetic Induction. Magnetic induction uses a magnetic coil to create resonance, which can transmit energy over very short distances. Power is delivered as a function of coil size (the larger the coil, the more power), and coils must be directly paired (one receiver coil to one transmitter coil = directly coupled pair) within a typical distance of less than one inch. Products utilizing magnetic induction have been available for 10+ years in products such as rechargeable electronic toothbrushes.

Magnetic Resonance. Magnetic resonance is similar to magnetic induction, as it uses magnetic coils to transmit energy. This technology uses coils that range in size depending on the power levels being transmitted. It has the ability to transmit power at distances up to ~11 inches (30cm) which can be increased with the use of resonance repeaters.

Conductive. Conductive charging uses conductive power transfer to eliminate wires between the charger (often a charging mat) and the charging device. It requires the use of a charging board as the power transmitter to deliver the power, and a charging device, with abuilt-in receiver, to receive the power. This technology requires direct metal contact between the charging board and the receiver. Once the charging board recognizes the receiver, the charging begins.

RF Harvesting. Harvesting RF energy is at the core of Energous’our WattUp technology. RF harvesting approaches typically utilizeutilizes directional antennas to target and deliver energy. To our knowledge, there are two other companies attempting to utilize a directional pocket of energy similar to that being developed by Energous.us.

Index to Financial Statements

Laser. Laser charging technology uses very short wavelengths of light to create a collimated beam that maintains its size over distance, using what is described as distributed resonance to deliver power to an optical receiver.

Ultrasound. Ultrasound charging technology converts electric energy into acoustic energy in the form of ultrasound waves. It then reconverts those waves through an “energy-harvesting” receiver.

4

Our Business Strategy

We intendPursuant to license our solution to consumer product companies who design, manufacture or cause to manufactureStrategic Alliance Agreement with Dialog, Dialog manufactures and market devices todistributes IC products incorporating our wire-free charging technology. Dialog is our exclusive supplier of these products for the consumer and who would benefit from wire-free charging.general market. We intend to pursue this licensing path because we believe there are several market verticals to whichvertical markets with large volumes of potential annual sales that would benefit from our technology, can apply, and as a result, we believe that thismay purchase our proprietary components through the Strategic Alliance Agreement. Our strategy is to support the most capital-efficient manner in which we can address manydevelopment and proliferation of them at once.our WattUp® technology to form a ubiquitous wire-free charging ecosystem.

In addition, weWe believe that our greatest market opportunity is to create a ubiquitous protocol forlies in wire-free charging at a distance, which we anticipate may develop in much the same way that as theWi-Fi is the standard for wire-free data. ecosystem has developed. The goal is to ensure interoperability between base stationstransmitters and receivers that are based on our technology, regardless of who made them, installed them into finished goods, or marketed them. The implementation of previous standardsubiquitous solutions, such asWi-Fi and Bluetooth, should help to illustrateillustrates our goal; goal. For example,Wi-Fi routers, regardless of their designer or manufacturer, work withWi-Fi receivers installed in various consumer electronic devices, regardless of the manufacturer. Accordingly, we are following the same rollout strategy asWi-Fi in that we endeavor to:

 

Carefully select initial target markets;

Build multiple silicon-based chips to advance the technology;

Partner with leading product companies;

Develop reference designs to reduce early adopter risks and foster adoption;

Provide game-changing benefits to the consumer in terms of utility and convenience;

Design initial iterations of the technology to be small but scalable implementations that are compatible on both a local and enterprise scale;

Invest in ease of use;

Develop a strategy to build out the ecosystem starting with the consumer and expanding to enterprise, industrial and military;

Implement a plan to initially sell ICs migrating to a combination of selling ICs and integrating our device libraries into third-party silicon such as Bluetooth Low Energy and Power Management Chips;

Develop and execute on a strategy to gain global regulatory approval for both contact and distance based charging; and

Support a consortium like the AirFuel™ Alliance (AFA) that is expected to lead to a qualification process to ensure compatibility of our WattUp technology across vendors and develop a common user experience at the application level.

In order for our technology to make ourbecome a ubiquitous solution the standard for charging at a distance, we intend to pursue an ecosystem strategy for our solution,technology, engaging not only potential licensees for our transmitter and receiver technologies, but also their upstream and downstream value chain partners. We also intend to capitalize on our first-to-market advantage and prioritize protectingprotection of our intellectual property portfolio, as we believe that keeping a firm grasp on this portfoliostrategy will make it less likely that a competing platform will be able to gain a solid foothold in theRF-based wirelesscharging-at-a-distance market and compete with our technology in a “standards battle.”meaningful way.

Index to Financial Statements

We believe our strategic relationshipsrelationship with key licenseesDialog will enable us to reap the benefits of our technology much faster and with greater penetration than by manufacturing and distributing or installing products ourselves. We believe this business model will also allowstrategic relationship allows us to solve the supply chain problem for major consumer electronic and IoT companies as well as leverage their highly regarded and experienced sales force while we concentrate our efforts and resources on engineering, development and commercialization projects more in line with our expertise as a research-and-development oriented company focused on generating licensable intellectual property. As we develop new applications for our technology, we expect to target new strategic relationships in different market sectors.

accelerate the introduction and adoption of the WattUp solution.

In order to demonstrateengage with potential licensees of the capabilityWattUp technology, we have developed evaluation kits consisting of oura transmitter and a receiver along with the enabling software to allow potential strategic partners to test the technology in their labs. The kits form a base “building block” component that is scalable to meet the needs of specific applications. We are developing processes and support capabilities to assist potential partners,customers as they evaluate the technology and develop specific designs to incorporate it.

In selecting initial customers, we are currently developing complete products, whichemploying a three-pronged strategy. First, we will convert into reference designs, whichare engaging with smaller, more nimble early adopters who have short product cycles to ship fully integrated WattUp enabled devices to the consumer as quickly as possible. These customers are important from a technology validation standpoint. Simultaneously, we intendare engaging with larger, top tier customers who have the ability to provideship WattUp enabled consumer and IoT devices in mass quantities beginning in the end of 2018. Finally, we continue to expand our licensees who will then modify and remanufacturecustomer based while we focus large opportunities with longer product cycles that should come to fit their own needs. These reference designs will be licensedfruition in 2019 where we expect to key partners, which we believe will allow themsee a significant increase in our revenues on the path to speed up incorporation of our technology into their product lines, create awareness and demand, and bring our power solution to market faster. We believe that our proprietary technology can potentially be utilized in a variety of devices, including smart phones, smart phone accessories, e-book readers, tablets, keyboards, mice, remote controls, rechargeable lights, cylindrical batteries, and any other device with similar charging requirements that would otherwise need a battery or a connection to a power outlet.

profitability.

Since we are developing a development stage company,new electronic device charging paradigm for consumers, we have not yet finalized some aspectsexpect the operational details of our strategy. For example,strategy to continue to evolve as our technology matures and our engagements with strategic partners solidify. As a result, we may decideexpect to sellmake operational course corrections as we steer the company towards our ASICs ourselves, rather than license the designgoal of those ASICs. That decision would depend on whether we believe selling ASICs ourselves would help meet the market demand of potential customers who would require our ASICs in order to provide their solution to the marketplace. However, we do not intend to manufacture our own ASICs. If we decide to sell our ASICs rather than license their designs, we will utilize a contract manufacturer to manufacture the ASICs. In any event, we do not intend to produce finished goods consumer products.

ubiquitous wire-free charging solution.

Our Initial Target Markets

We believe that our technology will be compelling to many endvertical markets, each of which may have several potential customers. In an effort toTo focus our activities and deliver a WattUp enable product tosee WattUp-enabled products in the consumerhands of consumers as quickly as possible, we may select certainhave selected initial target markets and strategic partners because of their time-to-market capabilities and theircustomers based on market potential.potential andtime-to-market capabilities. As we continue to develop our technology, we intend to add additionalmore markets and partners expanding our market presence.

partners.

We viewidentify our initialearly target markets in these two hardware categories.categories, transmitter target markets and receiver target markets.

5

Transmitter Target Markets

Wi-Fi Routers

We believeTransmitters are devices that consumers willbroadcast RF energy pockets that can be best able to understand our technologyaccessed byWatt-Up enabled receivers in the context of the wire-free data industry, since our technology allows devices to receive power while uncoupled in much the same way that the Wi-Fi router allowed devices to receive data while uncoupled. In addition, weconsumer electronic devices. We believe our transmitter technology can integrate well into form factorswill be developed and released in three basic categories:

Stand-alone transmitters that are either sold independently or bundled as part of a similar sizepairing with a WattUp-enabled receiver device;

Transmitters that are integrated into third party devices like televisions, computer monitors, sound bars, refrigerator doors, etc.; and

Transmitters that are integrated withWi-Fi routers to form a single device that provides both connectivity and wire-free power for a particular area.

Index to Financial Statements

Stand-Alone Transmitters:

We currently plan to release stand-alone transmitters in three categories:

Near Field WattUp Transmitters:

Because of the distinct advantages compared to other existing forms of contact-based wireless data routers. During the coursecharging including ease of our continuing system development,manufacturing and relative ease of regulatory approval, we expect that products using our Near Field transmitter technology will be the first WattUp enabled products on the market. Our Near Field transmitters are ideally suited for a broad spectrum of devices such as wearables, IoT devices and other small electronics that require a small form factor receiver and alow-cost charging solution as well as larger, more power-hungry devices like smartphones, smart watches and tablets. These solutions will initially beone-to-one (one transmitter to one receiver) withfollow-on versions being one transmitter to multiple receivers.

Mid Field WattUp Transmitters:

We expect that our Mid Field WattUp transmitters will be ablegeared to integratedesktop and automotive markets and will likely have a range of a few centimeters to one meter. We also intend for the Mid Field transmitters to have tracking ability to support mobile applications and multiple receiving devices. Midsized WattUp transmitters may include small desktop and nightstand transmitters designed to send power at distances for consumer electronic and IoT devices. The same technology may also be integrated into third party devices such as computer monitors, nightstand consumer electronics, accessories such as low voltage portable battery chargers and integrated automotive applications.

Far Field WattUp Transmitters:

Far Field WattUp transmitters are full featured transmitters with the power to charge multiple devices within a radius of up to 15 feet. We also expect that Far Field WattUp transmitters will have the ability to “pair” with other Far Field WattUp transmitters, allowing the user to create a large charging envelope encompassing many different rooms or large spaces while seamlessly providing charging to mobile devices that are moving through the coverage space. Far Field WattUp transmitters may also play a significant role in the powering of IoT devices that are fixed – such as security cameras and sensors. These may also be charged from a WattUp-enabledWi-Fi router, which addsRF-basedcharging-at-a-distance functionality.

Transmitters Integrated into Third Party Devices:

The “building block” core architecture developed for the WattUp technology is ideally suited to a broad spectrum of third party devices like televisions and refrigerator doors. The flexibility of the architecture in terms of size, power, distance, and cost affords Energous licensees the opportunity to match our technology with specific requirements and limitations typically found with complex integrations. For example, the WattUp technology could be integrated into form factors demanded by brandedthe door of a small refrigerator typically found in college dorm rooms providing charging capabilities to mobile devices anywhere in the room. Further, the “pairing” capabilities of the transmitter technology could enable licensees to develop venue-specific consumer electronics products like integrated televisions that are paired with integrated picture frames to provide mobile charging across a large room such as an airport lounge.

Wi-Fi Routers

We see the combination of the wire-free power router marketers.and theWi-Fi router as a natural integration point and a synergistic application of both technologies. The WattUp wire-free power router shares a number of technical characteristics withWi-Fi routers in that both devices operate in the airwaves in the unlicensed industrial, scientific and medical bands, both devices owe their success to the utility and convenience they bring to the

Index to Financial Statements

consumer, both devices rely on antenna structures to send power and data, and both devices “pair” or provide hand off capabilities which allow for large “enabled” sites similar to a mesh network. We also believe that our 3D pocketforming technology may be able to enhance the data signal of aWi-Fi router, which we believe will provide an even stronger value proposition to wireless data router manufacturers. In addition, we plan to collaborate with our tier-one consumer electronics company, development partner to engage with third party transmitter suppliers. Our belief is that through this joint approach we will be able to enhance the marketing of transmitters and manufacturing of transmitters which in turn would help drive the demand for receiving devices.

According to Infonetics Research, the wireless local area network (“WLAN”) market was approximately $4 billion in 2012. This includes enterprise access points, WLAN controllers and TheWi-Fi phone access points. The Wi-Fi router market has two segments: commercial and residential. The key differentiator between these segments is that commercial routers tend to have much more robust security features, including virtual private networks and advanced content filtering. We believe that our technology is applicable to both the commercial and residentialWi-Fi router markets. Consequently, we have begunmarkets based on the building block capabilities mentioned earlier that will enable the WattUp technology to engage with some of these leading firms ineffectively serve and support both of these segments.

markets.

In addition, theWi-Fi router market has other key players. These include consumer electronics supply chain firms, including original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), original design manufacturers (“ODMs”), component manufacturers and branded consumer electronics firms. We believe that each of these categories of players can help to integrate our technology into a commercially availableWi-Fi router.

An ODM designs products either collaboratively with their customers or on their own and manufactures them for sale to companies under the end customer’s brand. Additionally, an ODM may engage multiple companies with similar designs that are then marketed under several different end customers’ brands. An OEM manufactures products for sale under another firm’s brand. We believe that engaging with both types of organizations will be necessary to speed our entry into the market and extend our market reach.

Component suppliers are also a key part of our go-to-market strategy, as most ODMs and OEMs do not design their own components. We expect to be actively engaged with component companies that supply antennas, as well as mixed-signal, power and RF components to the major ODM and OEMs in the Wi-Fi router market.

As part of ourgo-to-market strategy under the Strategic Alliance Agreement with Dialog, we intend to market to major infrastructure developers, both forare currently working with customers offering consumer and commercial applications. Within these consumer markets, engagements will primarily be with consumer product companies who manufacture and market products to major residential home builders. For commercial installations, we will engage with the wireless network operators and private Wi-Fi system operators. We will also engage with concentrated consumer destinations (for example, coffee shop and restaurant chains, airport lounges and airports). We intend to educate concentrated consumer destinations on the benefitsapplications of our solutions to drive them to seek out and demand our solution from their vendors and suppliers.technology.

Receiver Target Markets

In January 2015, we signed a development and licensing agreement with a tier-one consumer electronics company to embed WattUp wire-free charging receiver technology in various products including, but not limited to mobile consumer electronics and related accessories. During the development phase and through our customer’s first customer shipment of product with our technology embedded in each licensed product category, we will afford this customer an exclusive time to market advantage in such licensed product categories.

This development and licensing agreement contains both invention and development milestones that we will need to achieve during the next two years. If we achieve such milestones, we are entitled to receive milestone-based development payments under the agreement.

This agreement, and the close collaboration with our partner it entails, will enable us to accelerate commercial development on a number of fronts. If successful, we believe this agreement also paves a very clear path to attaining critical mass in the market for WattUp wire-free power. We believe that this critical mass is driven by both wide adoption of our receiver technology, but just as importantly, having this wide adoption on the receiver side creates pull and demand for broad adoption of our transmitter technology. With the goal of promoting the establishment of a wire-free charging ecosystem based on the WattUp technology, we, and this partner, plan to collaborate to introduce WattUp technology to potential partner companies including router and accessory manufacturers.

Mobile Devices (Phones and Tablets)

We believe that the value proposition of our technology would be strengthened significantly if it were directly integrated into OEM subassemblies for mobile devices or the devices themselves, or alternatively, if our technology was integrated into third party silicon components already present in the mobile device. Both of these entry points would eliminate the need for accessory-based solutions. This presents an attractive market for us as the set of potential partners with whom to engage is readily identifiable and the opportunity with each is large given the concentrated market share of the major players. In January 2013, Gartner estimated that the size of the smart phone industry was approximately $117.5 billion in 2012, and would grow to approximately $175.4 billion in 2016. Gartner also estimated that the size of the combined media tablet and premium tablet industry was approximately $32 billion in 2012, and would grow to approximately $62.8 billion in 2016.

In order to develop relationships with the large mobile device OEMs, we believe it is important to build an ecosystem of key players across the value chain.

We have identified the key players in this value chain. We categorize these players as upstream providers (which produce components for OEMs and ODMs, such as baseband integrated circuits, application processors, Bluetooth modules, memory and batteries), midstream providers (which assemble devices for branded firms and test components for OEMs and ODMs) and downstream providers (which provide end-use services for consumers of devices sold by branded consumer electronics firms and include telecom operators and channel distributors).

Cases for Mobile Devices (Phones and Tablets)

We believe that cases for mobile devices (which include both phones and tablets) are an attractive initial market for our receiver. According to ABI Research, the mobile phone accessory market (which includes headphones and chargers as well as cases) was $20 billion in 2012. According to the NPD Group, the mobile phone case industry was approximately 36% of the overall mobile phone accessory market for the first half of 2012. If both of these figures are correct, the smartphone case market was approximately $7 billion in 2012.

In addition, this is a fiercely competitive market, with dozens of players looking for a way to differentiate themselves. There are hundreds of different types of mobile phone cases that range in price from under $10 to over $100, and are made of varying materials from simple polymers to full-grain leather. Some of these cases are differentiated by being thin and light, while others are differentiated by offering additional features such as external battery packs, waterproofing or credit card slots. We believe that this competition makes it more likely that we will be able to find a partner that chooses to differentiate its products by licensing our technology.

We further believe that this is an attractive market because the design cycles for these cases tend to be much shorter than those for the devices themselves. Though our longer-term goal remains integrating our receiver technology into the mobile devices themselves (through the branded consumer electronics firms that market them or the OEM or ODM that manufactures them), we believe that initially designing our receivers into cases will provide industry validation and “pull” our technology into the original mobile device manufacturer.

Other Markets

We believe there are many morea wide variety of potential marketsuses for our receiver technology, in the longer term. We are pursuing a licensing strategy so that we can bring our technology to multiple markets simultaneously.

Some potential long-term markets for our technology include:including:

 

WearableSmartphones

Hearing aids

IOT devices

Wearables

Tablets

Mice

Gaming consoles and controllers

Keyboards

e-book readers

 

Remote controls

 

Sensors (such as thermostats)

 

Toys

 

Rechargeable batteries

Rechargeable lights

 

Automotive accessories

 

Personal care products (such as toothbrushes or shavers)

 

Retail inventory management (such as RFID tags)

 

Hand-held industrial devices (such as scanners or keypads)

 

Medical devices

Index to Financial Statements

This list is meant for illustrative purposes only; we cannot guarantee that we will address any of these markets, and we may decide to address a market that is not on the above list. We intend to continuously evaluate our target markets and choose new markets based on factors including (but not limited to)time-to-market, market size and growth, and the strength of our value proposition for a specific application.

Key Strategic Partnership

In January 2015, we signed a Development and License Agreement with atier-one consumer electronics company to embed WattUp wire-free charging receiver technology in various products, including mobile consumer electronics and related accessories.

This Development and License Agreement, as amended, contains invention and development milestones requirements that we will need to achieve through fiscal 2018 and potentially beyond. We are entitled to receive development payments under the agreement, based on achievement of specified milestones.

During the development phase until one year after the first customer shipment of any WattUp enabled product within the partners portfolio of products, we will afford this customer a time to market advantage in the licensed product categories.

This agreement was last amended in December 2017 to allow us to market certain products that were previously restricted by the exclusivity terms of the agreement.

WattUp uses small form factor antennas that are formed using the existing device’s printed circuit board, removing the need for larger, more expensive coils. This enables broader adoption of wireless charging in a larger range of battery-powered devices, such as smartphones, tablets, IoT devices, small form factor wearables, gaming and Virtual Reality (VR)/Augmented Reality (AR) devices.

We believe this agreement, or one like it with another top tier consumer electronics company, presents an opportunity to accelerate critical mass adoption for WattUp® wire-free power. We also believe that partners are the key to adoption and critical mass by the broad distribution of embedded or stand-alone transmitters into other consumer electronics devices. Finally, having this wide adoption on both the transmitter and the receiver side should create demand for broad adoption of our technology from circles outside of our key strategic partners.

In November 2016, we entered into a Strategic Alliance Agreement with Dialog for the manufacture and distribution of IC products incorporating our wire-free charging technology. Dialog is our exclusive supplier of these products for specified fields of use. Our WattUp chipsets are ordered through and manufactured by Dialog, carry the Dialog brand and are shipped and supported by Dialog. Dialog agreed to not distribute, sell or work with any third party to develop any competing products without our approval. Energous and Dialog agreed on a revenue sharing arrangement and will collaborate on the commercialization of licensed products based on a mutually-agreed upon plan.

Our WattUp technology uses Dialog’s SmartBond®Bluetooth low energy solution as theout-of-band communications channel between the wireless transmitter and receiver. Dialog’s power management technology is used to distribute power from the WattUp receiver IC to the rest of the device while Dialog’s AC/DC Rapid Charge™ power conversion technology delivers power to the wireless transmitter.

Research and Development

Research and development costs accountaccounted for a substantial portionapproximately 66%, 69% and 63% of our total operating expenses.expenses for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our total research and development expenses were $12.5$33.2 million, $32.8 million, and $2.1$18.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2014,2017, 2016, and 2013,2015, respectively. Research and development expenses are expected to increase in the future as we concentrate our efforts and resources on the commercialization of our technology.

Index to Financial Statements

Our Intellectual Property

As a company primarily focused on licensing, we expect that our most valuable asset will be our intellectual property. This includes U.S. and foreign patents, patent applications andknow-how. We are pursuinghave implemented an aggressive intellectual property strategy and are developingcontinuing to pursue patent protection for new patents.

innovations. As of December 31, 2014,March 2, 2018, we had more than 170 pending patent applications in excess of 125 pendingthe U.S. and abroad. Additionally, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and international patent offices have issued 77 patents and provisional patentnotified us of the allowance of 50 additional patents applications. In addition to the inventions covered by these patents and patent applications, we have identified a significant number of additional specific inventions we believe may beare novel and patentable. We intend to file for patent protection for the most valuable of these, as well as for other new inventions that we expect to develop.

Our strategy is to continually monitor the costs and benefits of each patent application and pursue those that will best protect our business and expand the core value of the Company.

Government Regulation

Our wire-free charging technology involves the transmission of power using RF energy waves, which areis subject to regulation by the FCC,Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”), and may be subject to regulation by other federal, state, local and localinternational agencies. To our knowledge, the transmission of power in this manner by a consumer product at the ranges we are proposing is novel. We believe our technology is safe, and we are in the process of seeking FCC approval.

We believe our technology is safe because our proprietary waveform operates in the 2.4/5.8 GHz radio frequency range, which is the same range as Wi-Fi routers and several other wireless consumer electronics. For those types of products,continue to consult with the FCC grants what is known as Part 15and other regulatory bodies to establish a process by which devices incorporating WattUp® technology can secure required approvals.

As part of the regulatory approval if, among other things,process, devices incorporating the specific absorption rate (“SAR”) is below certain thresholds. In addition, because ourWattUp® technology involves the transmission of power greater than the power threshold limits of Part 15, we also expect towill need to obtain approvals under both FCC Part 15 and FCC Part 18, approval. To our knowledge, the transmission of power in this manner by a consumer product at the ranges we are proposingdepending on specific application. Energous has not yet been approvedreceived Part 15 and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain this approval or that other governmentalPart 18 FCC grants for WattUp enabled products and anticipates future domestic and international approvals will not be required.for new and updated designs.

 

Current FCC Approvals:

FCC ID

Description

Grant Date

2ADNG-MS300A

WPT Client Device with BLE 913 MHz

01/05/2018

2ADNG-NF130

RF Wireless Charger and Receiver 5.8 GHz

05/02/2017

2ADNG-MS300A

Digital Transmission System WPT Client Device with BLE 2.4 GHz

01/05/2018

2ADNG-MT100

Close Coupled 5.8 GHz Charger Pad

05/24/2016

2ADNG-MS300

Wireless Charger 913 MHz

12/26/2017

2ADNG-MLA1599

Digital Transmission System Bluetooth Accessory 2.4GHz

12/30/2014

2ADNG-NF130

Digital Transmission System RF Wireless Charger and Receiver 2.4 GHz

05/02/2017

2ADNG-MS300

Wireless Charger 2.4 GHz

12/26/2017

Employees

As of March 16, 2015,2, 2018, we had 3868 full-time employees. None of these employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and we believe our relationship with our employees is good. We also employ consultants, including technical advisors, on anas-needed basis to supplement existing staff. Consultants and technical advisors provide us with expertise in electrical engineering, software development and other specialized areas of engineering and science.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We are subject to variousmany risks that may materially harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. An investment in our common stock is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. In evaluating an investment in shares of our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks described below, together with the other information included in this prospectus.

If any of the events described in the following risk factors actually occurs, or if additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial later materialize, then our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition couldcondition. This discussion highlights some of the risks that might adversely affect our future operating results in material ways. We believe these are the risks and uncertainties that are the most important ones we face. We

Index to Financial Statements

cannot be materially adversely affected. Incertain that event, the tradingwe will successfully address these risks, and if we are unable to address them, our business may not grow, our stock price of our common stock could decline,may suffer and you maycould lose all or partthe value of your investment in our shares.company. Other risks and uncertainties that we do not currently recognize as material risks, or that are similar to risks faced by other companies in our industry, may also impair our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition. The risks discussed below include forward-looking statements, and our actual results may differ substantially from those discussedwhat is in these forward-looking statements.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have no history of generating sales or licensemeaningful product revenue, have a history of operating losses, and we may never achieve or maintain profitability.

We have a limited operating history upon which investors may evaluaterely in evaluating our business and its prospects. We have never generated sales or licenseonly very limited revenues to date and we have a history of losses from operations. As of December 31, 2014,2017, we had an accumulated deficit of $51,145,478, that included accumulated expense of $26,442,177 from changes in value of derivative liabilities and, accumulated stock based compensation expense of $2,564,126.approximately $174 million. Our ability to achieve material revenue-generating operations,generate revenues on a more reliable and ultimately,larger scale, and to achieve profitability, will depend on whether we can obtain additional capital when we need it,our ability to execute our business plan, complete the development of our technology, and incorporate it into products that technology into the products sold by our customers wish to buy, and then find customers who will purchase our future products and services. There can be no assurance thatto do so rapidly with appropriate financing if necessary. If we will everare unable to generate revenues orof significant scale to cover our costs of doing business, our losses will continue and we may not achieve profitability.

profitability, which could negatively impact the value of your investment in our securities.

Terms of our developmentDevelopment and licensing agreementLicense Agreement with atier-one consumer electronics company could inhibit potential licensees from working with us in specific markets.

We have entered into a Development and License Agreement with atier-one consumer electronics company to embed our WattUp wire-free charging receiver and transmitter technology in various products, including mobile consumer electronics and related accessories. This agreement provides our strategic partner atime-to-market advantage during the development and licensing agreement with a tier-one consumer products company that provides that company a time-to-market advantageuntil one year after the first customer shipment for certainspecified WattUp-enabled consumer products. The time-to-market advantage mightThis may inhibit anotherother potential licenseelicensees of our technology from engaging with us or theyon competing consumer products, and may be pressuredcause them to seek solutions offered by other solutionscompanies, which could have a negative impact on our future revenue opportunities.opportunities and financial results.

Our effortsWe may neverbe unable to demonstrate the feasibility of our technology.

We have developed a working prototypeprototypes of products using our technology, but significant additional research and development activity willis required to commercialize our technology for mid field and far field applications so that it can be required before we achieve asuccessfully integrated into commercial product.products. Our research and development efforts remain subject to all of the risks associated with the development of new products that are based on emerging technologies, including without limitationsuch as unanticipated technical or other problems, the inability to develop a productidentify products utilizing our technology that maywill be sold at anin demand with customers, getting our technology designed in to those products, designing new products for manufacturability, and achieving acceptable price pointpoints for final products. Our technology must also satisfy customer expectations and be suitable for them to use in consumer applications. Any delays in developing our technology that arise from factors of this sort would aggravate our exposure to the possible insufficiencyrisk of fundshaving inadequate capital to fund the research and development needed in order to complete development of these products and enable us to render services.products. Technical problems may result incausing delays andwould cause us to incur additional expenses that would increase our operating losses. If we cannot complete, or if we experience significant delays in developing our technology and products and services based on such technology,it for use in potential commercial applications, particularly after incurring significant expenditures, our business may fail. In particular, tofail and you could lose the value of your investment in our company. To our knowledge, the technological concepts we are applying to develop commercial applications of wire-free power for fixed and mobile low-power rechargeable devices have notnever previously been previously successfully applied by anyone else, ifapplied. If we fail to develop a practical efficient orand economical commercial productproducts based on those technological concepts,our technology, our business may fail.fail and you could lose the value of your investment in our stock.

Index to Financial Statements

WeThe FCC may not obtain FCCdeny approval for our technology, and existing laws or regulations or future legislative or regulatory changes may affectimpair our business.

Our wire-free charging technology involves the transmission of power using RFradio frequency (RF) energy, waves, which areis subject to regulation by the FCC, andFederal Communications Commission, or FCC. It may also be subject to regulation by other federal, state and local agencies. We intend to design our technology so that it willto operate in the 2.4/5.8 GHz radio frequency range, whicha RF band that is the same range as also used forWi-Fi routers and several other wireless consumer electronics. For those types of products, theSome customer applications may require us to develop our technology to work at different frequencies. The FCC grants what is known as Part 15product approval if, among other things, the specific absorption ratehuman exposure to radio frequency emissions is below certainspecified thresholds. In addition, because our technology involves the transmission ofFor products that transmit more power, greater than the power threshold limits of Part 15, we also expect to need to obtainadditional FCC Part 18 approval. To our knowledge, the transmission of power using RF energy waves by a consumer product at the ranges weapprovals are proposing has not yet been approved and thererequired. There can be no assurance that wedevices incorporating our technology will be able to obtain thisreceive FCC approval or that other governmental approvals will not be required. Our efforts to achieve required governmental approvals could beobtain FCC approval for devices using our technology is costly and time consuming and if weconsuming. If approvals are unable to receive any such required approvalsnot obtained in a timely and cost-efficient manner, our business and operating results maywould be materially adversely affected. The cost of compliance withharmed. In addition, new laws or regulations governing our technology or future products could adversely affect our financial results. New laws or regulations may impose restrictions or obligations on us that could forcerequire us to redesign our technology under development or other future products, and may impose restrictionsor that are not possibledifficult or practicableimpracticable to comply with, all of which could causewould adversely affect our business to fail. We cannot predict the impact on our business of any legislation or regulations related to our technology or future products that may be enacted or adopted in the future.

revenues and financial results.

We anticipate future lossesdepend upon our strategic relationship with Dialog Semiconductor, a provider of electronics products, and negative cash flow, and it is uncertain if or whenthere can be no assurance that we will become profitable.achieve the expected benefits of this relationship.

We have entered into a strategic cooperation agreement with Dialog Semiconductor, a provider of electronics products, pursuant to which we licensed our WattUp technology to Dialog and Dialog became the exclusive provider of our technology. We intend to leverage Dialog’s sales and distribution channels and its operational capabilities to accelerate market adoption of our technology, while we focus our resources on research and development of our technology. There can be no assurance that Dialog will promote our technology successfully, or that it will be successful in producing and distributing related products to our customers’ specifications. Dialog may have other priorities or may encounter difficulties in its own business that interfere with the success of our relationship. If this strategic relationship does not yet demonstrated an ability to generate license revenue, andwork as we intend, then we may never be ablerequired to produce material revenuesseek an arrangement with another strategic partner, or operate onto develop internal capabilities, which will require a profitable basis.commitment of management time and our financial resources to identify a replacement strategic partner, or to develop our own production and distribution capabilities. As a result, we have incurred losses sincemay be unable without undue expense to replace this agreement with one or more new strategic relationships to promote and provide our inception and expect to experience operating losses and negative cash flow for the foreseeable future.

We expect to expend significant resources on hiring of personnel and startup costs, including payroll and benefits, product and ASIC testing and development, intellectual property development and prosecution, marketing and promotion, capital expenditures, working capital and general and administrative expenses. We expect to incur costs and expenses related to prototype development, consulting costs, laboratory development costs, obtaining regulatory approvals required for our technology and reference product designs, marketing and other promotional activities, hiring of personnel, and the continued development of relationships with strategic business partners. We may not be able to obtain financing in a sufficient amount or at all. We anticipate our losses will continue to increase from current levels during our development stage.technology.

We expect tomay require additional financing in order to achieve our business plans.

We believe our technologyplans, and there is novel in offering the potential to make wire-free charging an affordable, ubiquitous and convenient service for end users. However, the consumer and commercial electronics industry in general and the power, recharging and alternative recharging segments ofno guarantee that industry in particular are subject to intense and increasing competition and rapidly evolving technologies. Accordingly, for our business plans to succeed we believe it will be important for us to move quickly to develop our technology, obtain required regulatory approvals and engage with strategic partners. As a small company, weavailable on acceptable terms, or at all.

We may be unable to successfully implement our ambitions of targeting very large markets in an intensely competitive industry segment without significantly increasing our resources. We do not have sufficient funds to fully implement our business plan, the ultimate goal of which is to license our technology to device manufacturers, wireless service providers and other commercial partners to make wire-free charging an affordable, ubiquitous and convenient service for end users.plans. We expect that unless we are able to obtain non-dilutive financing through licensing revenues or other strategic partner transactions, we will need to raise additional capital through new financings.financings, even if we begin to generate meaningful commercial revenue. Such financings could include equity financing, which may be dilutive to stockholders, or debt financing, which would likelycould restrict our ability to borrow from other sources. In addition, such securities may contain rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the rights of our current stockholders. There can be no assurance thatAs a result of economic conditions, general global economic uncertainty, political change, and other factors, we do not know whether additional fundscapital will be available when needed, or that, if available, we will be able to obtain additional capital on terms attractivereasonable terms. If we are unable to us,raise additional capital due to the volatile global financial markets, general economic uncertainty or at all. If adequate funds are not available,other factors, we may be required to curtail the development of our technology or materially curtailreduce operations as a result, or reduce our operations. We could be forced to sell or dispose of our rights or assets. Any inability to raise adequate funds on commercially reasonable terms could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operationoperations and financial condition, including the possibility that a lack of funds could cause our business to fail and liquidate with little or no return to investors.

Index to Financial Statements

We may have difficulty managing growth inExpanding our business.

Asbusiness operations as we expand our activities, thereintend will be additionalimpose new demands on our financial, technical, operational and management resources. The failure

To date we have operated primarily in the research and development phase of our business. If we are successful, we will need to continue toexpand our business operations, which will impose new demands on our financial, technical, operational and management resources. If we do not upgrade our technical, administrative, operating and financial control systems, or the occurrence of unexpected expansion difficulties arise, including issues relating to our research and development activities and retention of experienced scientists, managers and engineers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition andour results of operations and financial condition, and our ability to timely execute our business plan. If we are unable to implement these actions in a timely manner, our results may be adversely affected.

If we successfullyproducts incorporating our technology are launched commercially launch a product, and our product doesbut do not achieve widespread market acceptance, we will not be able to generate the revenue necessary to support our business.

AchievingMarket acceptance of a wire-free rechargingcharging system as a preferred method to rechargelow-power fixed and mobile electronic devices will be crucial to our continued success. Consumers and commercial customers will not begin to use or increase the use of our product unless they agree that the convenience of our solution would be worth the additional expense of purchasing our system. We have no history of marketing any product and we and our commercialization partners may fail to generate significant interest in the initial commercial products or any other product we or our partners may develop. These and otherThe following factors, including the following factors,among others, may affect the rate and level of the market acceptance:acceptance of products in our industry:

 

the price of products incorporating our system’s pricetechnology relative to other products or competing methods of recharging;technologies;

the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts;efforts of our commercialization partners;

the support and rate of acceptance of our technology and solutions with our joint development partners;

perceptionperceptions, by users, both individual and enterprise users, of our system’stechnology’s convenience, safety, efficiency and benefits compared to competing methods of recharging;technologies;

press and blog coverage, social media coverage, and other publicity and public relations factors whichthat are not within our control; and

regulatory developments related to marketing our products or their inclusion in others’ products.developments.

If we are unable to achieve or maintain market acceptance of our technology, and if related products do not win widespread market acceptance, our business wouldwill be significantly harmed.

If we successfullyproducts incorporating our technology are commercially launch a product,launched, we may experience seasonality or other unevenness in our financial results in consumer markets or a long and variable sales cycle in enterprise markets.

While we do not now have license revenue or a commercial product, ourOur strategy depends on developing athe development of successful commercial productproducts and effectively licensing our technology into the consumer, enterprise and commercial markets. We will need to understand procurement and buying cycles to be successful in licensing our technology into those markets. If we eventually generate a substantial portion of our revenues from licensing arrangements, wetechnology. We anticipate it is possible that demand for our technology could vary similarly with the market for products with which our technology may be used, for example, the market for new purchases of laptops, tablet, mobile phones, gaming systems, toys, wearables and the like. Such consumer markets are often seasonal, with peaks in and around the December holiday season and the August-Septemberback-to-school season. Enterprises and commercial markets may have annual or other budgeting and buying cycles that could affect us, and, particularly if we are designated as a capital improvement project, we may have a long or unpredictable sales cycle.

We may not be able to achieve all the product features we seek to include in our product.technology.

We have developed a prototypeworking prototypes of commercial products that utilize our product concept that displays limited functionality in a laboratory setting. There are a variety oftechnology. Additional features and performance specifications we seek to include in our product that wetechnology have not yet achieved. While we believe recharging multiple devices on one transmitterbeen developed. For example, some customer applications may require specific combinations of cost, footprint, efficiencies and

Index to Financial Statements

capabilities at a commercially acceptable level may be possible theoretically, we have not yet achieved these results, even in the laboratory.various charging power levels and distances as part of an overall system. We believe our research and development efforts will yield additional functionality and capabilities over time. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in achieving all the features we are targeting and our inability to do so may limit the appeal of our producttechnology to consumers.

Use ofFuture products based on our technology under development or other future products may require the user to purchase additional products to use with existing devices. To the extent these additional purchases are inconvenient, the adoption of our technology under development or other future products could be slowed, which would harm our business.

For rechargeable devices that will utilize our receiver technology, the technology may be embedded in a sleeve, case or other enclosure. For example, certain products such as remote controls or toys equipped with replaceable AA size or other sized batteries would need to be outfitted with enhanced batteries and other hardware that would enableenabling the devices to be rechargeable by our system. In each case, to use a device with our system, an end user willwould be required to retrofit the device with a receiver and may be required to upgrade the battery technology used with the device (unless, for example, a consumer electronics supply chain firm has built compatible battery technology and a receiver are built into the device). These additional steps and expenses may offset the convenience for some users and discourage some users from purchasing our technology under development or other future products. Such factors may inhibit adoption of our technology, which wouldcould harm our business. We have not developed thean enhanced battery to be usedfor use in devices with our technology, and our ability to enable use of our technology with devices that will require an enhanced battery will depend on our ability to develop a commercial version of such an enhanceda battery that could be manufactured at a reasonable cost. If we fail to develop or enable a commercially practicable enhanced battery, we expect our business wouldcould be harmed, and we may need to change our strategy and target markets.

Laboratory conditions differ from field conditions, which could affect the effectiveness of our technology under development or other future products. Failures to effectively move from laboratory to the field effectively would harm our business.

Our technology, whenWhen used in the field, our technology may not be able to match the observations, developments,perform as expected based on test results and performance thatof our technology may be able to achieve (and we may be able to document) under controlled laboratory circumstances. As oneFor example, of the difference between ideal laboratory conditions and field use, consider that in the laboratory we can arrange for the transmitter to have line-of-sighta configuration of obstructions of transmission to a receiver. If we intend to test the performance through obstructions, we can control the configurations of the obstructions and the materials from which such obstructions are made. In the field, however, the receiver maywill be obscured or obstructed, or placed around a corner. Also,arranged in some fashion, but in the field receivers may be obstructed in many different and unpredictable ways over which we will have no control over the configuration of the obstructions or the materials that comprise each obstruction.control. These conditions may significantly decrease or eliminatediminish the power received at the receiver or the effective range of the transmitter, because the RF energy from the transmitter may be absorbed by obscuring or blocking material or may need to be reflected off of a surface to reach the receiver, making the transmission distance longer than straight-line distances. The failure of products using our technology under development or other future products to be able to meet the demands of users in the field wouldcould harm our business.

Safety concerns and legal action by private parties may affect our business.

We believe that our technology is safe. However, it is possible that we could discover safety issues with our technology or keep that some people may be concerned with wire-free transmission of power in a manner that has occurred with some other wireless technologies as they were put into residential and commercial use, such as the safety concerns that were raised by some regarding the use of cellular telephones and other devices to transmit data wirelessly in close proximity to the human body. While we plan to at least partially address this potential concern by developing our management software to be configurable by users to selectively recharge devices in ways that would be intended to avoid recharging in close proximity to a human body, such as recharging only during predetermined time periods or recharging only when the device is not moving, we do not plan to conduct any tests to determine whether RF waves produce harmful effects on humans or other animals. We may be unable to effectively prevent recharging in close proximity to a user’s body, which could affect the marketability of our technology or could result in requests for law or regulation governing our technology under development or a class of products in which our technology under development would be included. In addition, while we believe our technology is safe, users of our technology under development or other future products who suffer medical ailments may blame the use of products incorporating our products,technology, as occurred with a small number of users of cellular telephones. A discovery of safety issues relating to our technology wouldcould have a material adverse effect on our business and any legal action against us claiming our productstechnology caused harm could be expensive, divert management and adversely affect us or cause our business to fail, whether or not such legal actions were ultimately successful.

Index to Financial Statements

Our industry is subject to intense competition and rapid technological change, which may result in products or new solutionstechnology that areis superior to our technology under development or other future products we may bring to market from time to time.ours. If we are unable to anticipate or keep pace with changes in the marketplace and the direction of technological innovation and customer demands, our technology and products may become less useful or obsolete and our operating results will suffer.

The consumer and commercial electronics industry in general, and the power, recharging and alternative recharging segments of that industry in particular, are subject to intense and increasing competition and rapidly evolving technologies. Because products incorporating our productstechnology are expected to have long development cycles, we must anticipate changes in the marketplace and the direction of technological innovation and customer demands. To compete successfully, we will need to demonstrate the advantages of our products and technologies over well-established alternative solutions, productsestablished alternatives, and technologies, as well asover newer methods of power delivery and convince consumers and enterprises of the advantages of our products and technologies.delivery. Traditional wallplug-in recharging remains an inexpensive alternative to our technology under development. Also, directlytechnology. Directly competing technologies such as inductive charging, magnetic resonance charging, conductive charging, ultrasound and other yet unidentified solutions may have greater consumer acceptance than the technologies we have developed. Furthermore, certain competitors may have greater resources than uswe have and may be better established in the market than we are. We cannot be certain which other companies may have already decided to or may in the future choose to enter our markets. For example, consumer electronics products companies may invest substantial resources in wireless power or other recharging technologies and may decide to enter our target markets. Successful developments of competitors that result in new approaches for recharging could reduce the attractiveness of our products and technologies or render them obsolete.

Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to establish and maintain a competitive position in current and future technologies. Rapid technological development may render our technology under development or future products based on our technology obsolete. Many of our competitors have or may have greater corporate, financial, operational, sales and marketing resources andthan we have, as well as more experience in research and development than we have.development. We cannot assure you that our competitors will not succeed in developingdevelop or marketingmarket technologies or products that are more effective or commercially attractive than our products or that would render our technologies and products obsolete. We may not have or be able to raise or develop the financial resources, technical expertise, marketing, distribution or support capabilities to compete successfully in the future. Our success will depend in large part on our ability to maintain a competitive position with our technologies.

Our competitive position also depends on our ability to:

generate widespread awareness, acceptance and adoption by the consumer and enterprise markets of our technology under development and future products;

design a product that may be sold at an acceptable price point;

develop new or enhanced technologies or features that improve the convenience, efficiency, safety or perceived safety, and productivity of our technology under development and future products;

properly identify customer needs and deliver new products or product enhancements to address those needs;

limit the time required from proof of feasibility to routine production;

limit the timing and cost of regulatory approvals;

attract and retain qualified personnel;

protect our inventions with patents or otherwise develop proprietary products and processes; and

secure sufficient capital resources to expand both our continued research and development, and sales and marketing efforts.

If our technology under development isdoes not or our future products are not competitivecompete well based on these or other factors, our business wouldcould be harmed.

Index to Financial Statements

It is difficult and costly to protect our intellectual property and our proprietary technologies, and we may not be able to ensure their protection.

Our success depends significantly on our ability to obtain, maintain and protect our proprietary rights to the technologies used in products incorporating our products.technologies. Patents and other proprietary rights provide uncertain protections, and we may be unable to protect our intellectual property. For example, we may be unsuccessful in defending our patents and other proprietary rights against third party challenges.

As of December 31, 2014, If we had in excess of 125 pending U.S. patents and provisional patent applications on file, but do not have any issued patentsthe resources to defend our intellectual property, the value of our intellectual property and our licensed technology will decline, threatening our potential revenue and results of operations.

We depend upon a combination of patent, trade secrets, copyright and trademark laws to protect our intellectual property and technology.

In addition to patents, we expect toWe rely on a combination of patents, trade secrets, copyright and trademark laws, nondisclosure agreements and other contractual provisions and technical security measures to protect our intellectual property rights. These measures may not be adequate to safeguard the technology underlying our products.technology. If they do not protect our rights adequately, third parties could use our technology, and our ability to compete in the market would be reduced. Although we are attempting to obtain patent coverage for our technology where available and where we believe appropriate, there are aspects of the technology for which patent coverage may never be sought or received. We may not possess the resources to or may not choose to pursue patent protection outside the United States or any or every country other than the United States where we may eventually decide to sell our future products. Our ability to prevent others from making or selling duplicate or similar technologies will be impaired in those countries in which we have no patent protection. Although we have in excessa number of 125 pending U.S. patents and provisional patent applications on file in the United States, protecting aspects of our technology under development, ourthe patents may not issue, as a result of those applications drawing priority or otherwise based on those patent applications, may issue only with limited coverage or may issue and be subsequently successfully challenged by others and held invalid or unenforceable.

Similarly, even if patents do issueare issued based on our applications or future applications, any issued patents may not provide us with any competitive advantages. Competitors may be able to design around our patents or develop products that provide outcomes comparable or superior to ours. Our patents may be held invalid or unenforceable as a result of legal challenges by third parties, and others may challenge the inventorship or ownership of our patents and pending patent applications. In addition, if we choose to and are able to secure protection in countries outside the United States, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. In the event a competitor infringes upon our patent or other intellectual property rights, enforcing those rights may be difficult and time consuming. Even if successful, litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights or to defend our patents against challenge could be expensive and time consuming and could divert our management’s attention. We may not have sufficient resources to enforce our intellectual property rights or to defend our patents against a challenge.

We may also in the future as one of our strategiesOur strategy is to deploy our technology into the market licenseby licensing patent and other proprietary rights to aspects of our technology to third parties and customers. Disputes with our licensors may arise regarding the scope and content of these licenses. Further, our ability to expand into additional fields with our technologies may be restricted by our existing licenses or licenses we may grant to third parties in the future.

The policies we use to protect our trade secrets may not be effective in preventing misappropriation of our trade secrets by others. In addition, confidentiality agreements executed by our employees, consultants and advisors may not be enforceable or may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary information in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure. Litigating a trade secret claim is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, courts outside the United States are sometimes less willing to protect trade secrets. Moreover, our competitors may independently develop equivalent knowledge methods andknow-how. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, we may be unable to prevent competitors from using our own inventions and intellectual property to compete against us, and our business may be harmed.

Index to Financial Statements

We may be subject to patent infringement or other intellectual property lawsuits which maythat could be costly to defend.

Because our industry is characterized by competing intellectual property, we may be sued for violatingbecome involved in litigation based on claims that we have violated the intellectual property rights of others. Determining whether a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual issues, and the outcome of patent litigation actions is often uncertain. We have not conducted any significant search of patents issued to third parties, and noNo assurance can be given that third party patents containing claims covering our products, parts of our products, technology or methods do not exist, have not been filed, or could not be filed or issued. Because of the number of patents issued and patent applications filed in our technical areas or fields (including some pertaining specifically to wireless charging technologies), our competitors or other third parties may assert that our products and technology and the methods we employ in the use of our products and technology are covered by United States or foreign patents held by them. In addition, because patent applications can take many years to issue and because publication schedules for pending applications vary by jurisdiction, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware, and which may result in issued patents that our technology under development or other future products would infringe. Also, because the claims of published patent applications can change between publication and patent grant, there may be published patent applications that may ultimately issue with claims that we infringe. There could also be existing patents that one or more of our technologies, products or parts may infringe and of which we are unaware. As the number of competitors in the market for wire-free power and alternative recharging solutions increases, and as the number of patents issued in this area grows, the possibility of patent infringement claims against us increases. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively than we can because they have substantially greater resources. In addition, any uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise the funds necessary to continue our operations.

In the event that we become subject to a patent infringement or other intellectual property lawsuit and if the relevant patents or other intellectual property were upheld as valid and enforceable and we were found to infringe or violate the terms of a license to which we are a party, we could be prevented from selling any infringing products of ours unless we could obtain a license or were able to redesign the product to avoid infringement. If we were unable to obtain a license or successfully redesign, we might be prevented from selling our technology under development or other future products. If there is an allegation ora determination that we have infringed the intellectual property rights of a competitor or other person, we may be required to pay damages, orpay a settlement, or pay ongoing royalties.royalties, or be enjoined. In these circumstances, we may be unable to sell our products or license our technology at competitive prices or at all, and our business and operating results could be harmed.

We could become subject to product liability claims, product recalls, and warranty claims that could be expensive, divert management’s attention and harm our business.

Our business exposes us to potential liability risks that are inherent in the marketing and sale of products used by consumers. We may be held liable if our technology under development now or in the future causes injury or death or are found otherwise unsuitable during usage. Our technology under development incorporates sophisticated components and computer software. Complex software can contain errors, particularly when first introduced. In addition, new products or enhancements may contain undetected errors or performance problems that, despite testing, are discovered only after installation. While we believe our technology is safe, users could allege or possibly prove defects (some of which could be alleged or proved to cause harm to users or others) because we design our productstechnology to perform complex functions involving RF energy, possibly in close proximity to users. A product liability claim, regardless of its merit or eventual outcome, could result in significant legal defense costs. The coverage limits of our insurance policies we may choose to purchase to cover related risks may not be adequate to cover future claims. If sales of products incorporating our productstechnology increase or we suffer future product liability claims, we may be unable to maintain product liability insurance in the future at satisfactory rates or with adequate amounts. A product liability claim, any product recalls or excessive warranty claims, whether arising from defects in design or manufacture or otherwise, could negatively affect our sales or require a change in the design or manufacturing process, any of which could harm our reputation and business, harm our relationship with licensors of our products, result in a decline in revenue and harm our business.

Index to Financial Statements

In addition, if a product that we designedor a strategic partner design is defective, whether due to design or manufacturing defects, improper use of the product or other reasons, we or our strategic partners may be required to notify regulatory authorities and/or to recall the product. A required notification to a regulatory authority or recall could result in an investigation by regulatory authorities of products incorporating our products,technology, which could in turn result in required recalls, restrictions on the sale of thesuch products or other penalties. The adverse publicity resulting from any of these actions could adversely affect the perception of our customers and potential customers. These investigations or recalls, especially if accompanied by unfavorable publicity, could result in our incurring substantial costs, losing revenues and damaging our reputation, each of which would harm our business.

We are subject to risks associated with our utilization of consultants.

To improve productivity and accelerate our development efforts while we build out our own engineering team, we may use experienced consultants to assist in selected business functions, including the development of our ASICs.projects. We take steps to monitor and regulate the performance of these independent third parties. However, arrangements with third party service providers may make our operations vulnerable if these consultants fail to satisfy their obligations to us as a result of their performance, changes in their own operations, financial condition, or other matters outside of our control. Effective management of our consultants is important to our business and strategy. The failure of our consultants to perform as anticipated could result in substantial costs, divert management’s attention from other strategic activities, or create other operational or financial problems for us. Terminating or transitioning arrangements with key consultants could result in additional costs and a risk of operational delays, potential errors and possible control issues as a result of the termination or during the transition.

We expect to depend on consumer electronics supply chain firms to manufacture, market and distribute our technology under development. If these strategic partners fail to successfully manufacture, market and distribute our technology under development, our business will be materially harmed.

We currently intend to license our system architecture, proprietary waveform, antenna design and ASIC designs to consumer electronics supply chain firms rather than manufacture our technology under development ourselves. We will not be able to control the efforts and resources these consumer electronics supply chain firms would devote to marketing our technology under development or other future products. Those third parties may not be able to successfully market and sell the products they develop based on our technology, may not devote sufficient time and resources to support the marketing and selling efforts and may not market those products at prices that will permit the products to develop, achieve or sustain market acceptance. Finding new licensors could be an expensive and time-consuming process and we may not be able to find suitable consumer electronics supply chain firms and other distribution strategic partners on acceptable terms or at all. If we cannot find suitable third party partners or our third party partners experience difficulties, do not actively market our technology under development or future products or do not otherwise perform under our license agreements, our potential for revenue may be dramatically reduced, and our business could be harmed.

16

We intend to pursue licensing of our technology as a primary means of commercialization but we may not be able to secure advantageous license agreements. If we are not able to secure advantageous license agreements for our technology, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected.

We are pursuingpursue the licensing of our technology as a primary means of commercialization.revenue generation. We believe there are many companies that would be interested in implementing our technology into their devices. Many of these companies are well-known, world-wide companies. We have entered into one product development and license agreement with atier-one consumer electronics company that has the potential to yield license revenue. In addition, weWe have also entered into a totalnumber of 16evaluation and joint development agreements providing for our development of reference designs which serve to describe the integration of our technology into thewith potential strategic partner’s products.partners. However, the joint developmentthese agreements do not commit either party to a long-term relationship and any of these parties may disengage with us at any time. Creating a license or otherlicensing business relationship with these classes of companies will takeoften takes a substantial effort, as we expect to have to convince themthe counterparty of the efficacy of our technology, meet their design and manufacturing requirements, satisfy their marketing and product needs, and comply with their selection, review and contracting requirements. There can be no assurance that we will be able to gain entryaccess to these companies,potential licensing partners, or that they will ultimately decide to integrate our technology with their products. We may not be able to secure license agreements with customers on advantageous terms, that are advantageous to us. Furthermore,and the timing and volume of revenue earned from license agreements will be outside of our control. If the license agreements we enter into do not prove to be advantageous to us, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Our business is subject to data security risks, including security breaches.

We, or our third-party vendors on our behalf, collect, process, store and transmit substantial amounts of information, including information about our customers. We take steps to protect the security and integrity of the information we collect, process, store or transmit, but there is no guarantee that inadvertent or unauthorized use or disclosure will not occur or that third parties will not gain unauthorized access to this information despite such efforts. Security breaches, computer malware, computer hacking attacks and other compromises of information security measures have become more prevalent in the business world and may occur on our systems or those of our vendors in the future. Large Internet companies and websites have from time to time disclosed sophisticated

and targeted attacks on portions of their websites, and an increasing number have reported such attacks resulting in breaches of their information security. We and our third-party vendors are at risk of suffering from similar

Index to Financial Statements

attacks and breaches. Although we take steps to maintain confidential and proprietary information on our information systems, these measures and technology may not adequately prevent security breaches and we rely on our third-party vendors to take appropriate measures to protect the security and integrity of the information on those information systems. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to or to sabotage information systems change frequently and may not be known until launched against us, we may be unable to anticipate or prevent these attacks. In addition, a party who is able to developillicitly obtain a technology that meetscustomer’s identification and password credentials may be able to access the customer’s account and certain account data.

Any actual or suspected security breach or other compromise of our development partner's specifications. Even if we succeedsecurity measures or those of our third-party vendors, whether as a result of hacking efforts,denial-of-service attacks, viruses, malicious software,break-ins, phishing attacks, social engineering or otherwise, could harm our reputation and business, damage our brand and make it harder to retain existing customers or acquire new ones, require us to expend significant capital and other resources to address the breach, and result in developing a technology that meets allviolation of applicable laws, regulations or other legal obligations. Our insurance policies may not be adequate to reimburse us for direct losses caused by any such security breach or indirect losses due to resulting customer attrition.

We rely on email and other messaging services to connect with our existing and potential customers. Our customers may be targeted by parties using fraudulent spoofing and phishing emails to misappropriate passwords, payment information or other personal information or to introduce viruses through Trojan horse programs or otherwise through our customers’ computers, smartphones, tablets or other devices. Despite our efforts to mitigate the specifications ineffectiveness of such malicious email campaigns through product improvements, spoofing and phishing may damage our developmentbrand and licensing agreement,increase our development partner could decline to use our technology in its products.costs. Any of these events would have a material adverse effect on our business.

The terms of our only development and licensing agreement with a tier-one consumer products company require us to meet stringent performance specifications and aggressive technical milestones. While we are devoting substantial corporate time and resources to the development of our technology for this company’s products, there can be no assurance that we can meet the performance specifications and technical milestones in the timeframe required by the development and licensing agreement or at all. Further, the decision to embed our technology within its products is completely in our development partner’s discretion and itcircumstances could decline to use our technology in its products even if we meet all the performance specifications and technical milestones set forth in the agreement. Additionally, the development and licensing agreement prohibits us from the development of our technology for certain product categories until our development partner has introduced products with our technology embedded in those categories to consumers. If we are unable to meet the stringent performance specifications and aggressive technical milestones required by the development and licensing agreement or our development partner declines to embed our technology in its products,materially adversely affect our business, would be significantly harmed. The harm to our business resulting from either of these scenarios will exacerbated by the fact that we have agreed to limited exclusivity in certain product categories with our development partner.

financial condition and operating results.

We are highly dependent on certain key members of our executive management team. Our inability to retain these individuals could impede our business plan and growth strategies, which could have a negative impact on our business and the value of your investment.

Our ability to implement our business plan depends, to a critical extent, on the continued efforts and services of Stephen Rizzone (Chief Executive Officer), Michael Leabman (Chief Technology Officer), George Holmes (Senior Vice Presidenta very small number of Sales and Marketing) and Cesar Johnston (Senior Vice President of Engineering).key executives. If we lose the services of any of these persons, we would likelycould be forcedrequired to expend significant time and money in the pursuit of replacements, which may result in a delay in the implementation of our business plan and plan of operations. WeIf necessary, we can give no assurance that we could find satisfactory replacements for these individuals on terms that would not be unduly expensive or burdensome to us. We do not currently carry akey-man life insurance policy that would assist us in recouping our costs in the event of the death or disability of eitherany of these executives.

Our long-term success and growth strategy depend on our ability to attract, integrate and retain high-level engineering talent.

Because of the highly specialized and complex nature of our business, our success and future growth also depends on management’sour ability to attract, hire, train, integrate and retain high-level engineering talent. Competition for such personnel is intense asbecause we compete for talent as a pre-revenue company against many large profitable companies and our inability to adequately staff our operations with highly qualified and well-trained engineers could render us less efficient and impede our ability to develop and deliver a commercial product. Such a competitive market could put upward pressure on labor costs for engineering talent. In addition, risingWe may incur significant costs associated with certain employee benefits,to attract and retain highly qualified talent, and we may lose new employees to our competitors or other technology companies before we realize the benefit of our investment in particular employee health coverage, could limitrecruiting and training them. Volatility or lack of performance in our stock price may also affect our ability to provide certain employee benefits in the future. If we are unableattract and retain qualified personnel.

Index to provide a competitive employee benefits package, including continuing equity incentive grants, recruiting and retaining qualified personnel may become more difficult.

Financial Statements

Risks Related to OwningOwnership of Our Common Stock

As an investor, youYou may lose all of your investment.

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. As an investor, you may never recoup all, or even part of, your investment and you may never realize any return on your investment. You must be prepared to lose all of your investment.

Our stock price couldis likely to continue to be volatile and investors may have difficulty selling their shares.volatile.

Our common stock is currently listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “WATT.” For the period from March 28, 2014 when trading began on the NASDAQ Capital Market through December 31, 2014, the daily trading volume for shares of our common stock ranged from 6,200 to 2,403,900 shares traded per day, and the average daily trading volume during such period was 162,713 shares.

The market price of the common stock has fluctuated significantly since it was first listed on the NASDAQ CapitalThe Nasdaq Stock Market on March 28,in 2014. Since this date, through December 31, 2014, theOur common stock has experienced an intra-day trading price has fluctuated fromhigh of $33.50 per share and a low of $7.11 to a high of $16.44.$6.91 per share over the last 52 weeks. The price of our common stock mayis likely to continue to fluctuate significantly in response to many factors some of whichthat are beyond our control, includingincluding:

Regulatory announcements, such as the following:recent FCC approval of ourmid-range transmitter and receiver technology;

actual or anticipated variations in operating results;

the limited number of holders of the common stock;

changes in the economic performance and/or market valuations of other technology companies;

our announcements of significant strategic partnerships, orregulatory developments and other events;

announcements by other companies in the wire-free charging space;

articles published or rumors circulated by third parties regarding our business, technology or development partners;

additions or departures of key personnel; and

sales or other transactions involving our capital stock, including sales that may occur following the termination of applicable lock-up periods.stock.

We are an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Actcompany,” and are able to take advantage of 2012 and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements, excluding applicable to emerging growth companies, maywhich could make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, (“JOBS Act”), and, for as long as we maycontinue to be an emerging growth company, we intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements, that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with theprovide auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,our internal controls, reduced disclosure obligations regardingabout executive compensation, in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptionsexemption from the requirements of holdingrequirement to hold a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approvalcompensation. However, we chose not to delay compliance with new or revised financial accounting standards. We could be an emerging growth company until 2019 or, if earlier, the year when the market value of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions.held by non-affiliates exceeds $700.0 million as of the last business day of our most recent second quarter end. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result of reduced disclosure of this sort, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, although we will lose that status sooner if our revenues exceed $1 billion, if we issue more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt in a three year period, or if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30.

decline.

Our status as an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act of 2012 may make it more difficult to raise capital as and when we need it.

Because of the exemptions from various reporting requirements provided to us as an “emerging growth company,” we may be less attractive to investors and it may be difficult for us to raise additional capital as and when we need it. Investors may be unable to compare our business with other companies in our industry if they believe that our reporting is not as transparent as other companies in our industry. If we are unable to raise additional capital as and when we need it,maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy of our financial conditionreports.

As a public company, we are required to maintain internal control over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in such internal controls. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we evaluate and determine the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Although our management has

Index to Financial Statements

determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017, we cannot assure you that we not identify a material weakness in our internal control in the future.

If we have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting in the future, we may not detect errors on a timely basis. If we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or if we identify a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting in the future, it could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet our SEC reporting obligations or Nasdaq listing requirements, adversely affect our reputation, cause our stock price to decline or result in inaccurate financial reporting or material misstatements in our annual or interim financial statements. Further, if there are material weaknesses or failures in our ability to meet any of operationsthe requirements related to the maintenance and reporting of our internal controls such as Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and that could cause the price of our common stock to decline. We could become subject to investigations by Nasdaq, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional management attention and which could adversely affect our business.

In addition, our internal control over financial reporting will not prevent or detect all errors and fraud. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud will be materially and adversely affected.

detected.

We have not paid dividends in the past and have no immediate plans to pay dividends.

We plan to reinvest all of our earnings, to the extent we have earnings, in order to market our products and technology and to cover operating costs and to otherwise become and remain competitive. We do not plan to pay any cash dividends with respect to our securities in the foreseeable future. We cannot assure you that we would, at any time, generate sufficient surplus cash that would be available for distribution to the holders of our common stock as a dividend.

Concentration of ownership among our existing executive officers, directors and significant stockholders may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions.

All decisions with respect to the management of the Company will beour company are made by our board of directors and our officers, who collectively, beneficially own approximately 4.4%7.6% of our common stock as calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.collectively. In addition, otherour greater than 5% stockholders such as Dialog, Emily and Malcolm Fairbairn, Hood River Capital Management, DvineWave, Holdings LLC whichand BlackRock Inc. beneficially ownsowned approximately 15% of our common stock, AWM Investment Company Inc. which beneficially owns approximately 7% of our common stock17.6%, 7.0%, 6.7%, 6.7%, and Absolute Ventures, which owns approximately 5%5.4%, respectively, of our common stock as calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.February 15, 2018. As a result, these stockholders will be able to exercise a significant level of control over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, amendment of our certificate of incorporation and approval of significant corporate transactions. This control could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our Companycompany or changes in management and will make the approval of certain transactions difficult or impossible without the support of these stockholders.

We expect to continue to incur significant costs as a result of being a public reporting company that reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission and our management will be required to devote substantial time to meet our compliance obligations.

As a public company reporting to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”),company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. We are subject to reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that impose significant requirements on public companies, including requiring establishmentrequire us to establish and maintenance ofmaintain effective disclosure controls and financial controls, and changes inas well as some specific corporate governance practices. In addition, on July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Protection Act was enacted. There are significant corporate governance and executive compensation-related provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act that are expected to increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and may also place undue strain on our personnel, systems and resources. Our management and other personnel are expected to devote a substantial amount of time to these new compliance initiatives.initiatives associated with our public reporting company status.

Index to Financial Statements

We may be subject to securities litigation, which is expensive and could divert management attention.

Our stock price has fluctuated in the past, most recently following our announcement of Federal Communications Commission approval of ourmid-field transmitter technology, and it may be volatile in the future. In addition, we expect these rules and regulationsthe past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their securities have been subject to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance,securities class action litigation, and we may be requiredthe target of litigation of this sort in the future. Securities litigation is costly and can divert management attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm our business and the value of your investment in our company.

An active trading market for our common stock may not be maintained.

Our stock is currently traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market, but we can provide no assurance that we will be able to accept reduced policy limits and coveragemaintain an active trading market on this or incur substantially higher costs to obtainany other exchange in the same or similar coverage. As a result,future. If an active market for our common stock is not maintained, it may be more difficult for our stockholders to sell or purchase shares. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital to continue to fund operations by selling shares and impair our ability to acquire other companies or technologies using our shares as consideration.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. There can be no assurance that analysts will continue to attract and retain qualified peoplecover us or provide favorable coverage. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock or change their opinion of our stock, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to serveregularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

Our ability to use net operating loss carry forwards to reduce future tax payments may be limited if our taxable income does not reach sufficient levels.

As of December 31, 2017, we had a Federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward of $84,418,000. Under the U.S. Tax Code, NOL can generally be carried forward to offset future taxable income for a period of 20 years. Our ability to use our NOL during this period will be dependent on our boardability to generate taxable income, and the NOL could expire before we generate sufficient taxable income. As of directors,December 31, 2017, based on our board committees or as executive officers.

19

history of operating losses it is possible that a portion of our NOL is not fully realizable.

Our charter documents and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover that stockholders consider favorable.

Provisions of our Certificatecertificate of Incorporation (“Certificate”)incorporation and bylaws, and applicable provisions of Delaware law, may delay or discourage transactions involving an actual or potential change in control or change in our management, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares, or transactions that our stockholders might otherwise deem to be in their best interests. The provisions in our Certificatecertificate of incorporation and bylaws:

 

authorize our board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval and to designate the rights, preferences and privileges of each class; if issued, such preferred stock would increase the number of outstanding shares of our capital stock and could include terms that may deter an acquisition of us;

limit who may call stockholder meetings;

do not permit stockholders to act by written consent;

do not provide for cumulative voting rights; and

Index to Financial Statements
provide that all vacancies may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of directors then in office, even if less than a quorum.

In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law may limit our ability to engage in any business combination with a person who beneficially owns 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock unless certain conditions are satisfied. This restriction lasts for a period of three years following the share acquisition. These provisions may have the effect of entrenching our management team and may deprive you of the opportunity to sell your shares to potential acquirers at a premium over prevailing prices. This potential inability to obtain a control premium could reduce the price of our common stock.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comment

Comments

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties

Our principal office isIn 2014, we entered into a lease agreement for our corporate headquarters located at Northpointe Business Center, 3590 North First Street Suite 210,in San Jose, California. The lease will expire in August 2019. This space is used for our headquarters and for research and development efforts. In 2015, we entered into two sub-lease agreements for additional laboratory space in San Jose, CA, 95134. Asboth of December 31, 2014,which expire in June 2019. In May 2017, we are leasing approximately 15,000 square feet of office and laboratory space underentered into a lease thatagreement for office space in Costa Mesa, CA which is due toutilized by our engineers residing in Southern California, which will expire in September 2019. The initial monthly base rent was $36,720 per month. In addition, pursuant to the lease we issued to the landlord 41,563 shares of restricted stock valued at $500,000, of which $400,000 will be applied to reduce the Company’s base rent by $6,732 per month and of which $100,000 was used for certain tenant improvements.

On February 26, 2015, we agreed to rent an additional 3,491 square feet of classroom space from an existing tenant in the same building in which we currently lease space through a sub-lease agreement which expires on June 30, 2019 (3 months prior to the expiration of our existing facility lease). The additional space is required to accommodate the build out of additional laboratory and testing space. Per the agreement, we anticipate additional monthly office rent expense of $6,109.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are not currently a party to any pending legal proceedings that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our business or financial conditions. We may, however, be subject to various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business from time to time.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

20

Index to Financial Statements

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our shares of common stock are listed on the NASDAQ CapitalThe Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol “WATT.” The table below provides, for the fiscal quarters indicated, the reported high and low closing sales prices for our common stock on the NASDAQ CapitalThe Nasdaq Stock Market since March 28, 2014.January 1, 2016.

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2014 High  Low 
First Quarter (beginning March 28) $14.75  $10.58 
Second Quarter $15.57  $10.53 
Third Quarter $14.60  $10.01 
Fourth Quarter $11.46  $7.25 

   Price Range 
   High   Low 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016

    

First Quarter

  $11.02   $3.86 

Second Quarter

  $13.65   $9.58 

Third Quarter

  $19.61   $11.74 

Fourth Quarter

  $19.26   $12.92 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017

    

First Quarter

  $19.16   $13.61 

Second Quarter

  $16.45   $12.30 

Third Quarter

  $16.51   $8.95 

Fourth Quarter

  $31.57   $7.38 

As of December 31, 2014,2017, there were 5413 holders of record of our common stock. Westock, and we believe we have significantly more beneficial holders of our common stock.

We have never paid cash dividends on our securities and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our shares of common stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain any future earnings for reinvestment in our business. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors, and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant.

Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

On March 27, 2014, our Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (Reg. No. 333-193522) was declared effective in connection with the IPO of our common stock, pursuant to which we sold 4,600,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $6.00 per share, including the full exercise of the underwriters' option to purchase additional shares. The offering closed on April 2, 2014, as a result of which we received In April 2014 we completed our IPO of 4,600,000 shares of common stock through which we raised net proceeds of approximately $24.8 million after deducting approximately $2.4 million in underwriting discounts, commissions and expenses and approximately $0.4 offering expenses payable by us. MDB Capital Group, Inc. was the underwriter for the offering. No payments were made by us to directors, officers or persons owning ten percent or more of our common stock or to their associates, or to our affiliates, other than payments in the ordinary course of business to officers for salaries and to non-employee directors as compensation for board or board committee service.

There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our IPO as described in our final prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on March 27, 2014.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto.

 

   2017  2016  2015 

Selected data from the Statements of Operations:

    

Revenue

  $1,154,009  $1,451,941  $2,500,000 

Loss from operations

  $(49,387,828 $(45,830,720 $(27,577,339

Net loss

  $(49,376,875 $(45,817,394 $(27,561,702

Basic and diluted loss per common share

  $(2.31 $(2.60 $(2.07

Selected data from Balance Sheets:

    

Total Assets

  $15,405,445  $35,258,940  $32,675,528 

Not applicable.The Company has had no long-term liabilities, preferred stock or dividends declared.

Index to Financial Statements

Item 7. Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

We are developinghave developed a technology to enablecalled WattUp® that consists of proprietary semiconductor chipsets, software, hardware designs and antennas that enables radio frequency (“RF”) based charging for electronic devices, providing wire-free charging of electronic devices at a distancesolutions for contact-based charging and at-a-distance charging, ultimately enabling charging with complete mobility under full software control. Our ultimate goal isPursuant to license our WattUpTMtechnology to consumer product companies, device manufacturers, wireless data router manufacturersStrategic Alliance Agreement with Dialog Semiconductor plc (“Dialog”), Dialog manufactures and other commercial partners to makedistributes integrated circuit (“IC”) products incorporating our RF-based wire-free charging an affordable, ubiquitous and convenient service offeringtechnology. Dialog is our exclusive supplier of these ICs for end users.the general market. We believe our proprietary technology can potentially be usedutilized in a variety of devices, including smart phones,wearables, hearing aids, earbuds, Bluetooth headsets, Internet of Things (“IoT”) devices, smartphones, tablets, e-book readers, wearables, keyboards, mice, remote controls, rechargeable lights, cylindrical batteries, medical devices and any other devicesdevice with similar charging requirements that would otherwise need a battery or a connection to a power outlet.

We believe our technology is novel in its approach, in that itwe are developing a solution that charges electronic devices by surrounding them with a three dimensional (“3D”)focused, radio frequency (“RF”)energy pocket (“RF energy pocket”). We are developingengineering solutions that we expect to enable the wire-free transmission of energy from one or multiple transmitter(s) to multiple receivers connected to or integrated into electronic devices, at distancesfor contact-based applications as well as far field applications of up to fifteen (15)15 feet. We have developed multiple prototype systems consisting of either a single or multiple transmitter(s) in various forms and sizes, multiple smart phone receiver cases, various other forms of receiving devices and management software.

We are also developing what we believe will be an enterprise class management and control system for our WattUp solutionFar Field transmitter technology to seamlessly mesh (like a network of Wi-Fi routers) to form a wire-free charging network that will incorporate cloud based networkallow users to charge their devices as they move from room-to-room or throughout a large space. To date, we have developed multiple transmitter prototypes in various form factors and power capabilities. We have also developed multiple receiver prototypes, including smartphone battery cases, toys, fitness trackers, Bluetooth headsets and tracking devices, as well as stand-alone receivers. We are also in the pre-production stage leading to mass production with early adopters of the WattUp technology to bring the first contact-based transmitters and compatible receivers to market.

In November 2016, we entered into a Strategic Alliance Agreement with Dialog, pursuant to which Dialog will manufacture and distribute IC products incorporating our wire-free charging technology. Dialog is our exclusive supplier of these products for the general market. Our WattUp technology will use Dialog’s SmartBond® Bluetooth low energy solution as theout-of-band communications channel between the wireless transmitter and receiver. In most cases, Dialog’s power management technology will then be used to distribute power from the WattUp receiver integrated circuit to the rest of the device while Dialog’s AC/DC Rapid Charge™ power conversion technology delivers power to the wireless transmitter.

On December 26, 2017, we announced Federal Communications Commission (FCC) certification of our first-generation WattUp Mid Field transmitter, which sends focused,RF-based power to devices at a distance of up to three feet, while also charging multiple devices at once. Our WattUp Mid Field transmitter underwent rigorous, multi-month testing to verify it met consumer safety and regulatory requirements. We believe this achievement represents the first certification of a Part 18 FCC approvedpower-at-a-distance wireless charging transmitter, and also establishes a precedent that will streamline both our future FCC and international regulatory approvals, as well as the necessary local interface and control for the transmitter and receiver.

We believe that if our development, regulatory and commercialization efforts are successful, our transmitter and receiver solutions will initially be able to simultaneously charge up to 24 devices, ranging from ¼ watt up to sixteen (16) watts, depending on the number of devices, with a range of fifteen (15) feet in radius or in a charging envelop bounded by thirty (30) feet. Subsequent development efforts will focus on increasing the power delivery capability, increasing distance, enhancing the management and control solution and lowering overall system cost.

As partapprovals of our commercialization efforts, in May 2014 we executed our first of 16 joint development agreements with strategic partners which providecustomers for the exchange of technology and which serve to describe the integration of our technology into the strategic partners’ products. At the Consumer Electronics Show, January 5-9, 2015, we met with over 100 existing or new potential joint development partners, demonstrated various electronic devices employing the WattUp technology and demonstrated an end-to-end wire-free power solution in a typical home environment. It is our objective during the first and second quarter of 2015 to narrow our research and development efforts to those strategic partners whose goals, capabilities and commercialization potential we believe most closely aligns with ours.

In January 2015, we signed a development and licensing agreement with a tier-one consumer electronics company to embed WattUp wire-free charging receiver technology in various products including, but not limited to mobile consumer electronics and related accessories. During the development phase and through customer shipment of the first licensed product, we will afford this customer an exclusive time to market advantage in the licensed product categories.

This development and licensing agreement contains both invention and development milestones that we will need to achieve during the next two years. Pursuant to the Agreement, we will receive development payments based upon its achievement of milestones, as provided for in the Agreement, including the receipt of an initial payment of $500,000 earned upon the signing of the Agreement. There can be no assurance that we will meet all required milestones under this agreement or that this strategic partner will include our technology in any products.

We have pursued an aggressive intellectual property strategy and are developing new patents. As of December 31, 2014, we had in excess of 125 pending U.S. patents and provisional patent applications. In addition to the inventions covered by these patent applications, we have identified a significant number of additional specific inventions we believe may be novel and patentable. We intend to file for patent protection for the most valuable of these, as well as for other new inventions that we expect to develop. Our strategy is to continually monitor the costs and benefits of each patent application and, when appropriate, pursue those that will best protect our business.

their respectiveend-products.

We have recruited and hired a seasoned management team with both private and public company experience and relevant industry experience to develop and execute our operating plan. In addition, we have identified and hired additionalkey engineering resources in the areas of IC development, antenna development, hardware, software and firmware engineering as well as integration and testing which we expect will build up the engineering capability of our internal team. We were incorporated in Delaware on October 30, 2012 under the name DvineWave Inc. and in January 2014 we changed our name to Energous Corporation. We are located in San Jose, CA. To date, our operations have been funded through the sale of our common stock and convertible debt (which has since been converted into shares of our common stock).

We have not generated any revenue to date, and have incurred significant losses from operations since inception. We expectallow us to continue to incur operating lossesexpand our technology and intellectual property as well as meet the support requirements of our licensees.

The market for products using our technology is nascent and unproven, so the foreseeable future as we develop our technology.Company’s success is sensitive to many factors, including technological feasibility, regulatory approval, customer acceptance, competition and global market fluctuations.

Index to Financial Statements
22

Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Certain accounting policies and estimates are particularly important to the understanding of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by our management or can be materially affected by changes from period to period in economic factors or conditions that are outside of our control. As a result, they are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying these policies, our management uses their judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates. Those estimates are based on our historical operations, our future business plans and projected financial results, the terms of existing contracts, our observance of trends in the industry, information provided by our customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. Please see Note 3 to our financial statements for a more complete description of our significant accounting policies.

Basis of Presentation. The accompanying audited financial statements and footnotes for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and applicable rules and regulations of the SEC regarding financial information.

Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue when the following criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, collection of the revenue is reasonably assured, and the fees are fixed or determinable.

We record revenue associated with product development projects that we enter into with certain customers. In general, these projects are associated with complex technology development, and as such we do not have certainty about our ability to achieve the program milestones. Achievement of the milestone is dependent on our performance and the milestone typically needs to be accepted by the customer. The payment associated with achieving the milestone is generally commensurate with our effort or the value of the deliverable and is nonrefundable. We record the expenses related to these projects, generally included in research and development expense, in the periods incurred.

We also receive nonrefundable payments, typically at the beginning of a customer relationship, for which there are no milestones. We recognize this revenue ratably over the initial engineering product development period. We record the expenses related to these projects, generally included in research and development expense, in the periods incurred.

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we recorded revenue of $1,154,009, $1,451,941 and $2,500,000, respectively.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses are charged to operations as incurred. For internally developed patents, all patent application costs are expensed as incurred as research and development expense. Patent application costs, generally legal costs, are expensed as research and development costs until such time as the future economic benefits of such patents become more certain. The Company incurred research and development costs of $12,511,647$33,230,668, $32,832,677 and $2,109,890$18,825,041 for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

Income Taxes. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of items that have been included or excluded in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their respective financial reporting amounts (“temporary differences”) at enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.

Index to Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, the Company had $12,511,647$23,601,688, $31,848,990 and $2,095,367,$15,464,406, respectively, of research and development expenses capitalized for federal income tax purposes, with amortization commencing upon the Company receiving an economic benefit from the related research. As of December 31, 2014,2017, the Company had $5,814,569approximately $84,418,000 gross federal and state net operating loss carryovers (“NOLs”) and a federal tax credit carryover of $877,597. For the years endedapproximately $2,686,000. As of December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, deferred tax assets consisted principally of net operating loss and tax credit carryovers, the research and development costs and stock-based compensation, and such deferred tax assets were fully reserved. Accordingly, the Company’s effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 was 0%.

Internal Revenue Code Section 382 imposes limitations on the use of net operating loss carryovers when the stock ownership of one or more 5% shareholders (shareholders owning 5% or more of the Company’s outstanding capital stock) has increased on a cumulative basis by more than 50 percentage points. Management cannot control the ownership changes occurring as a result of public trading of the Company’s Common Stock. Accordingly, there is a risk of an ownership change beyond the control of the Company that could trigger a limitation of the use of the loss carryover. AsThe Company completed a Section 382 analysis as of December 31, 2014, the Company has not completed an analysis whether an ownership change occurred under Section 382, which, if it did occur, could substantially limit its ability in the future to utilize2017 and determined that none of its NOLs and other tax carryforwards.

or R&D credits would be limited.

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the future generation of taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and taxing strategies in making this assessment. Based on this assessment, management has established a full valuation allowance against all of the net deferred tax assets for each period, since it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Tax benefits are recognized only for tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement. A liability for “unrecognized tax benefits” is recorded for any tax benefits claimed in the Company’s tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards. As of December 31, 2014,2017 and 2013,2016, no liability for unrecognized tax benefits was required to be reported. The guidance also discusses the classification of related interest and penalties on income taxes. The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. No interest or penalties were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2014,2017, 2016 and 2013.

Convertible Instruments. The Company accounts for hybrid contracts that feature conversion options in accordance with ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging Activities,” (“ASC 815”) and ASC 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” (“ASC 480”), which require companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments according to certain criteria. The criteria includes circumstances in which (i) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (ii) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (iii) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument. The Company accounts for convertible instruments that have been determined to be free standing derivative financial instruments (when the Company has determined that the embedded conversion options should be bifurcated from their host instruments) in accordance with ASC 815. Under ASC 815, a portion of the proceeds received upon the issuance of the hybrid contract is allocated to the fair value of the derivative. The derivative was subsequently marked to market at each reporting date based on current fair value, with the changes in fair value reported in results of operations.

Conversion options that contain variable settlement features such as provisions to adjust the conversion price upon subsequent issuances of equity or equity linked securities at exercise prices more favorable than that featured in the hybrid contract generally result in their bifurcation from the host instrument.

The Company accounted for convertible debt instruments, when the Company has determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments, in accordance with ASC 470-20 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options”. The Company records, when necessary, discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized under the effective interest method over the term of the related debt.

On April 2, 2014, all convertible debt instruments and the related derivative liabilities were extinguished and converted into 1,930,128 shares of common stock.

2015.

Common Stock Purchase Warrants and Other Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement ornet-share settlement or (ii) provides a choice ofnet-cash settlement or settlement in the Company’s own shares (physical settlement ornet-share settlement) providing that such contracts are indexed to the Company’s own stock as defined in ASC815-40 “Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity” (“ASC815-40”). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) requirenet-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the Company’s control) or (ii) givesgive the counterparty a choice ofnet-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement ornet-share settlement). The Company assesses classification of common stock purchase warrants and other free standing derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between assets and liabilities or equity is required.

Results of Operations

For the Years Ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016

Revenues.

Revenues.  Through During the years ended December 31, 2014,2017 and 2016, we have not generated revenues.recorded revenue of $1,154,009 and $1,451,941, respectively, upon the achievement of milestones under a development and licensing agreement. The

Index to Financial Statements

decrease in revenue of $297,932 is due to the rescoping of project milestones, affecting the amount and timing of the achievement of these milestones.

Operating Expenses and Loss from OperationsExpenses.. Operating expenses are made upconsist of derivative instrument issuance, research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative and marketing expenses. Loss from operationsOperating expenses for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013 was $20,374,7092016 were $50,541,837 and $4,435,470, respectively. Derivative instrument issuance expense was $0 and $887,062 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013,$47,282,661, respectively.

Research and Development Expenses.Research and development expenses include costs for developing our technology, such as IC design costs, salaries, software and facility costs. Research and development costs for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 were $12,511,647$33,230,668 and $2,109,890,$32,832,677, respectively. The $397,991 increase in research and development expenses is primarily due to a $3,287,398$5,939,073 increase in compensation, including a $4,296,494 increase in stock-based compensation of $924,702,and a $1,642,579 increase in payroll and related compensation expense, from a largergreater average headcount withinand the department,issuance of additional restricted stock unit (RSU) awards, and a $3,575,586$390,072 increase in spending on components, designdepreciation due to a higher asset base in lab equipment and perpetual engineering software licenses, partially offset by a $3,966,298 decrease in chip development, manufacturing and engineering suppliescomponent costs due to more transmitter and receiver chip development work being done in house, a $973,467 decrease in term-based engineering software licenses and $931,834 decrease in consulting costs.

Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses for the demonstration units at the Consumer Electronics Show (“CES”), a $1,051,158years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $5,207,746 and $3,201,549, respectively. The $2,006,197 increase in legal costssales and marketing expenses is primarily due to an increase of $1,753,758 in compensation, including a $969,398 increase in payroll and related to patent application filingsexpense and a $2,193,539$784,360 increase in hardwarestock-based compensation, due to a higher average headcount and software consulting expenses related to preparation for the demonstration unit presented at CES.issuance of additional RSU grants and a $235,506 increase in tradeshow expenses.

General and Administrative Expenses.General and administrative expenses include costs for general and corporate functions, including facility fees, travel, telecommunications, insurance, professional fees, consulting fees and other overhead. General and administrative costs for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 were $5,059,703$12,103,423 and $1,204,896,$11,248,435, respectively. The $854,988 increase in general and administrative expense is primarily due to a $1,546,656$1,180,146 increase in compensation, including a $1,213,790 increase in stock-based compensation of $1,023,890,and a $33,644 decrease in payroll costs, a $136,122 decrease in general office expenses, and a $117,692 decrease in consulting and third party service costs.

Loss from adding two new employees within the department and the retention of a full-time Chief Executive OfficerOperations. Loss from operations for the entireyears ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $49,387,828 and $45,830,720, respectively.

Interest Income. Interest income for the year in 2014, a $749,581 increase in investor relations and consulting costs, a $159,144 increase in insurance costs, primarily asended December 31, 2017 was $11,679, compared to $13,326 for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Net Loss. As a result of larger D&O premiums,the above, net loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $49,376,875, compared to $45,817,394 for the year ended December 31, 2016.

For the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

Revenues. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we recorded revenue of $1,451,941 and $2,500,000, respectively, upon the achievement of milestones under a $188,021 increasedevelopment and licensing agreement. The decrease in facilities costs, primarily from increased office rent after relocationrevenue of $1,048,059 is due to the San Joserescoping of project milestones, affecting the amount and timing of the achievement of these milestones.

Operating Expenses. During 2016 and 2015, operating expenses are made up of research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses. Operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $47,282,661 and $30,077,339, respectively.

Index to Financial Statements

Research and Development Expenses.Research and development expenses include costs for developing our technology, such as IC design costs, salaries, software and facility a $444,762 increase in recruiting costs related to our efforts to recruitcosts. Research and retain certain key employees and an increase of $368,088 in depreciation expense as a result of our acceleration in capital purchases during the second half of 2014.

Marketingdevelopment costs for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 were $2,803,359$32,832,677 and $233,622,$18,825,041, respectively. The increase in research and development costs of $14,007,636 is primarily due to increaseda $4,640,880 increase in compensation of $1,346,077, including(including an increase in stock-based compensation of $583,238,$1,409,597) from hiring five additional employeesa larger headcount within the department, a $4,483,417 increase in chip design, development and manufacturing costs for our receiver and transmitter chips, a $1,564,187 increase in patent legal costs related to the department during 2014,management of our patent portfolio, an $883,272 increase in software expense due to incurring a full year of $662,448 in public relations and consulting expensesthe hosted design solution package and an increase of $256,368 in travel costs associated with the preparation of CESvarious engineering software licenses needed to support a larger staff and meetings with potential customersan $819,503 increase in consulting fees to assist in our quality assurance, design and strategic partners.regulatory efforts.

Sales and Marketing Expenses.

Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities.  Change in fair value of derivative liabilities Sales and marketing expenses for the years ended December 31, 2014,2016 and 2013 was $26,265,177,2015 were $3,201,549 and $177,000,$3,221,303, respectively. The decrease in sales and marketing costs of $19,754 is primarily due to minor decreases in consulting and travel, partially offset by minor increases in compensation, recruiting and tradeshow expenses.

General and Administrative Expenses.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense General and administrative expenses include costs for general and corporate functions, including facility fees, travel, telecommunications, insurance, professional fees, consulting fees and other overhead. General and administrative costs for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013 was $1,024,7742015 were $11,248,435 and $908,611, respectively,$8,030,995, respectively. The increase in general and included amortizationadministrative expense of debt discount$3,217,440 is primarily due to a $2,966,474 increase in compensation, including stock-based compensation increase of $2,547,733, from increased headcount within the department and newly executed executive stock award agreements, a $305,390 increase in telecommunications and miscellaneous office expenses to support a larger company headcount, a $232,667 increase in legal, accounting and insurance fees, partially offset by a $163,341 decrease in consulting and outside service fees.

Loss from Operations. Loss from operations for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013 of $964,8512015 was $45,830,720 and $705,289,$27,577,339, respectively.

Interest Income. Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $13,326 as compared to $15,637 for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Gain on Debt ExtinguishmentNet Loss..  Gain on debt extinguishment As a result of the above, net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $45,817,394 as compared to $27,561,702 for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded revenue of $1,154,009 and $1,451,941, respectively. We incurred a net loss of $49,376,875 and $45,817,394 for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2016, respectively. Net cash used in operating activities was $2,084,368 as compared to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2013. The gain on debt extinguishment resulted from the conversion of the convertible notes$34,430,298 and the related extinguishment of the notes, accrued interest payable and the derivative liability.

Net Loss.  Net loss$33,062,247 for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013 was $45,603,110 and $5,521,081, respectively.

25

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have not generated revenues and have net losses of $45,603,110 and $5,521,081 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013,2016, respectively. Since inception, we have met our liquidity requirements principally through the private placement of convertible notes, the sale of our common stock in a registered initial public offerings,offering, the sale of our common stock to a strategic investor, the issuance of our common stock to ourthe Company’s landlord to reduce ourits monthly base rent obligation and pay for certain tenant improvements, and the sale of common stock in a December 2014 secondary offering.

twofollow-on public offerings, sales of stock to investors in private placements, and revenue received under product development projects entered into with customers.

As of December 31, 2014,2017, we had cash on handand cash equivalents of $31,494,592. In April 2014$12,795,254. Also, as noted in the subsequent event section of our 2017 audited financial statements, during January 2018, we completed our IPOraised $38,999,989 (net of 4,600,000 sharesunderwriters’ discount of common$1,000,000) from the sale of stock at a price to the public of $6.00 per share through which we raised net proceeds of approximately $24.8 million. In connection with the completion of the IPO, our outstanding convertible notes and interest accrued thereon were converted into 1,833,336 and 96,792 shares, respectively, of common stock, thus extinguishing the debt associated with the notes. On April 4, 2014, we issued 210,527 shares of common stock to a strategic investor upon the receipt of net proceeds of $900,000 ($300,000 received on March 27, 2014, $700,000 received on April 4, 2014, net of commissions paid of $100,000).

On December 15, 2014, we completedin an underwritten public“at-the-market” equity offering of our common stock at a pricestock.

Index to the public of $7.00 per share through which we raised net proceeds of approximately $21.0 million.

Financial Statements

We believe our current cash on hand, together with anticipated payments under product development projects entered into with customers, will be sufficient to fund our operations into the second quarter of 2016.2019. However, depending on how soon we expectare able to achieve meaningful commercial revenues, we may require additional financing to fully implement our business plan, the ultimate goal of which is to license our technology to device manufacturers, wireless service providers and other commercial partners to make wire-free charging an affordable, ubiquitous and convenient service for end users. Potential financing sources could includefollow-on equity offerings, debt financing,co-development agreements or other alternatives. Depending upon market conditions, we may choose to pursue additional financing to, among other reasons, accelerate our product development efforts, regulatory activities and business development and support functions with a view to capitalizing on the market opportunity we see for our wire-free charging technology.

On April 24, 2015, we filed a “shelf” registration statement on FormS-3, which became effective on April 30, 2015. The “shelf” registration statement allows the Company from time to time to sell any combination of debt or equity securities described in the registration statement up to aggregate proceeds of $75,000,000, of which approximately $60,700,000 has already been sold.

During the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, cash flows used in operating activities were $15,606,422,$34,430,298, consisting of a net loss of $45,603,110,$49,376,875, lessnon-cash expenses aggregating $28,107,842$17,194,309 (representing principally the amortization of debt discount of $964,851, stock basedstock-based compensation of $2,547,978$15,802,819 and the change in fair valuedepreciation expense of derivative liabilities of $26,265,177 offset by the gain on the conversion of notes of $2,084,368)$1,309,980), an increasea $2,683,073 decrease in accounts payable, of $1,354,973, primarily due to increased component purchasing, use of consultantspartially offset by a $348,275 decrease in prepaid expenses and patent filing legal fees incurredother current assets and invoiceda $149,500 decrease in December 2014 and paid in early 2015 and an increase in accrued expenses of $838,945, primarily due to increases in accrued employee compensation and an accrued stock warrant payable to a vendor.accounts receivable. During the year ended December 31, 2013,2016, cash flows used in operating activities were $3,430,978,$33,062,247, consisting of a net loss of $5,521,081,$45,817,394, lessnon-cash expenses aggregating $10,546,795 (representing principally stock-based compensation of $9,508,175 and depreciation expense of $957,836), a $2,382,790 increase in accounts payable, a $492,616 increase in accrued expenses, partially offset by non-casha $652,336 increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, cash flows used in investing activities were $814,648 and $1,137,446, respectively. The cash used for year ended December 31, 2017 consisted of $1,631,879purchases of laboratory equipment and net changes in operating assetssoftware to help with chip development and liabilitiestesting. The cash used for the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted of $458,224.

purchases of laboratory and software to accommodate a larger engineering staff and to help with chip development and testing.

During the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, cash flows used in investing activities were $1,619,695 and $199,054, respectively. The increase for the year December 31, 2014 consisted principally of the purchase of laboratory and computer equipment and software while developing an initial prototype for demonstration at CES, as well as furniture, fixtures and tenant improvements for the new office in San Jose, CA.

During the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, cash flows provided by financing activities were $46,766,929 and$16,781,563, which consisted principally of the net proceeds from our IPO of $24,872,170, net proceeds from our secondary offering of $20,993,759 and net proceeds of $900,000$14,932,547 from the saleissuance of our common stock.shares to private investors, proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $979,950 and proceeds from contributions to the employee stock purchase program (“ESPP”) of $869,066. During the year ended December 31, 2013,2016, cash flows provided by financing activities were $5,582,818 and$35,585,766, which primarily consisted principally of $5,500,009 innet proceeds of $34,788,311 from the issuance of shares to private investors, proceeds from contributions to the employee stock purchase program (“ESPP”) of $727,784, proceeds from the saleexercise of convertible debtstock options of $382,351, offset by a total of $312,680 in shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of RSUs and $200,681 in proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common stock.

PSUs.

Research and development of new technologies is, by its nature, unpredictable. Although we intend to undertake development efforts with commercially reasonable diligence, there can be no assurance that our available resources including the net proceeds from our public offerings will be sufficient to enable us to develop our technology to the extent needed to create future revenues to sustain our operations.

We cannot assure that our technology will be adopted, that we will ever earn revenues sufficient to support our operations, or that we will ever be profitable. Furthermore, since we have no committed source of financing, we cannot assure youthere can be no assurance that we will be able to raise capital as and when we need it to continue our operations.

Contractual Obligations

In the ordinary course of business, we routinely enter into purchase commitments for various aspects of our operations, such as purchases of engineering supplies, lab equipment, chip design engineering, engineering

Index to Financial Statements

consulting services and software licenses. We do not believe these commitments will have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2017 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods:

   Total   Less than 1
Year
   1 to 3 Years   More than 3
Years
 

Operating leases

  $1,097,787   $640,202   $457,585   $—   

Engineering software commitment

   198,105    198,105    —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,295,892   $838,307   $457,585   $—   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

We do not have anyoff-balance sheet transactions.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

In the ordinary course of business, we may be exposed to certain market risks, such as interest rates. The annual impact of our results of operations of a 100 basis point interest rate change on December 31, 2017 would be minimal. After an assessment of these risks to our operations, we believe that the primary market risk exposures (within the meaning of RegulationS-K Item 305) are not material and are not expected to have any material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the next fiscal year.

 

Not applicable.

Index to Financial Statements

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Page(s)
  Page(s)

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-1
 34 

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016

F-2
 35 

Statements of Operations for the years ended December  31, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015

F-3
 36 

Statement of Changes in Stockholders'Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015

F-4
 37 

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December  31, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015

F-5
 38 

Notes to Financial Statements

F-739

Index to Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Energous Corporation (f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Energous Corporation (f/k/a DvineWave Inc.) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013 and2016, the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years then ended.  in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s financial statements based on our audits.

audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our auditsaudits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included considerationAs part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred/S/ Marcum LLP

MarcumLLP

Melville, NY

March 16, 2018

Index to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Energous Corporation (f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Marcum LLP
Marcum LLP
Melville, NY
March 30, 2015
Financial Statements

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

BALANCE SHEETS

 

  As of 
  December 31, 2014  December 31, 2013 
ASSETS        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $31,494,592  $1,953,780 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  416,580   127,197 
Prepaid rent, current  80,784   - 
Total current assets  31,991,956   2,080,977 
         
Property and equipment, net  1,515,299   189,612 
Prepaid rent, non-current  299,020   - 
Deferred offering costs  -   88,319 
Other assets  22,648   6,959 
Total assets $33,828,923  $2,365,867 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $1,716,011  $361,038 
Accrued expenses  792,349   243,623 
Convertible promissory notes, net  -   829,298 
Derivative liabilities  -   6,277,000 
Total current liabilities  2,508,360   7,710,959 
         
Commitments and contingencies        
         
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)        
Preferred Stock, $0.00001 par value, 10,000,000 and 0 shares authorized at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively;  no shares issued or outstanding.  -   - 
Common Stock, $0.00001 par value, 50,000,000 and 40,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively; 12,781,502 and 2,708,217 shares  issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.  127   27 
Additional paid-in capital  82,465,914   197,249 
Accumulated deficit  (51,145,478)  (5,542,368)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)  31,320,563   (5,345,092)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit) $33,828,923  $2,365,867 
         

   As of 
   December 31,
2017
  December 31,
2016
 
ASSETS   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $12,795,254  $31,258,637 

Accounts receivable

   —     149,500 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   1,026,310   1,374,585 

Prepaid rent, current

   80,784   80,784 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   13,902,348   32,863,506 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

   1,413,917   2,209,475 

Prepaid rent,non-current

   56,668   137,452 

Other assets

   32,512   48,507 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $15,405,445  $35,258,940 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   

Current liabilities:

   

Accounts payable

  $2,024,690  $4,707,763 

Accrued expenses

   1,622,025   1,867,995 

Deferred revenue

   —     131,959 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   3,646,715   6,707,717 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

   

Stockholders’ equity:

   

Preferred Stock, $0.00001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016; no shares issued or outstanding

   —     —   

Common Stock, $0.00001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016; 22,584,588 and 20,367,929 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

   225   202 

Additionalpaid-in capital

   185,659,954   153,075,595 

Accumulated deficit

   (173,901,449  (124,524,574
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

   11,758,730   28,551,223 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $15,405,445  $35,258,940 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Index to Financial Statements
F-2

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2014  2013 
       
Operating expenses:        
Derivative instrument issuance $-  $887,062 
Research and development  12,511,647   2,109,890 
General and administrative  5,059,703   1,204,896 
Marketing  2,803,359   233,622 
Loss from operations  (20,374,709)  (4,435,470)
         
Other (expense) income:        
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (26,265,177)  (177,000)
Interest, net  (1,024,774)  (908,611)
Loss on retirement of fixed assets  (22,818)  - 
Gain on debt extinguishment  2,084,368   - 
Total  (25,228,401)  (1,085,611)
         
Net loss $(45,603,110) $(5,521,081)
         
Basic and diluted net loss per common share $(5.75) $(2.11)
         
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted  7,933,791   2,617,022 

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2017  2016  2015 

Revenue

  $1,154,009  $1,451,941  $2,500,000 

Operating expenses:

    

Research and development

   33,230,668   32,832,677   18,825,041 

Sales and marketing

   5,207,746   3,201,549   3,221,303 

General and administrative

   12,103,423   11,248,435   8,030,995 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

   50,541,837   47,282,661   30,077,339 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss from operations

   (49,387,828  (45,830,720  (27,577,339
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

    

Interest income, net

   11,679   13,326   15,637 

Loss on sale of property and equipment

   (726  —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   10,953   13,326   15,637 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(49,376,875 $(45,817,394 $(27,561,702
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic and diluted loss per common share

  $(2.31 $(2.60 $(2.07
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted

   21,343,001   17,649,013   13,303,715 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Index to Financial Statements
F-3

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS'STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

 

  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-in
  Accumulated  Total
Stockholders'
 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity (Deficit) 
                
Balance at January 1, 2013  1,924,813  $19  $9,981  $(21,287) $(11,287)
                     
Common stock sold on January 28, 2013 to founder at $0.0052 per share  80,201   1   416   -   417 
                     
Common stock sold on March 4, 2013 to affiliate of a director at $0.24 per share  668,338   7   159,993   -   160,000 
                     
Common stock sold on May 7, 2013 to third party investor at $0.24 per share  20,051   -   4,800   -   4,800 
                     
Restricted common stock sold on May 14, 2013 under the 2013 Stock Plan of DvineWave, Inc., to consultant at $0.40 per share  88,882   1   35,463   -   35,464 
                     
Repurchase and retirement of restricted common stock from consultant on November 30, 2013 at $0.40 per share  (74,068)  (1)  (29,552)  -   (29,553)
                     
Stock-based compensation  -   -   16,148   -   16,148 
                     
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2013  -   -   -   (5,521,081)  (5,521,081)
                     
Balance at December 31, 2013  2,708,217  $27  $197,249  $(5,542,368) $(5,345,092)
                     
Stock-based compensation - stock options  -   -   1,333,943   -   1,333,943 
                     
Stock-based compensation - IR consultant warrant  -   -   263,972   -   263,972 
                     
Stock-based compensation - consultant restricted stock units ("RSUs")  -   -   900,063   -   900,063 
                     
Stock-based compensation - shares issued to consultant for services rendered  5,353   -   50,000   -   50,000 
                     
Issuance of shares to strategic investor, net of commission expense  210,527   2   899,998   -   900,000 
                     
Initial public offering on April 2, 2014, net of underwriter's discount and offering costs of $2,816,149  4,600,000   46   24,783,805   -   24,783,851 
                     
Conversion of convertible notes on April 2, 2014  1,930,128   19   26,790,158   -   26,790,177 
                     
Sale of IPO underwriter warrant on April 2, 2014  -   -   1,000   -   1,000 
                     
Extinguishment of derivative for consulting warrant and financing warrant on June 25, 2014  -   -   5,752,000   -   5,752,000 
                     
Shares issued to landlord for prepaid rent  41,563   -   500,000   -   500,000 
                     
Secondary offering on December 15, 2014, net of underwriter's discount and offering costs of $2,006,239  3,285,714   33   20,993,726   -   20,993,759 
                     
Net loss  -   -   -   (45,603,110)  (45,603,110)
                     
Balance, December 31, 2014  12,781,502  $127  $82,465,914  $(51,145,478) $31,320,563 

  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 
  Shares  Amount    

Balance, January 1, 2015

  12,781,502  $127  $82,465,914  $(51,145,478 $31,320,563 

Issuance of shares for services

  15,000   —     147,900   —     147,900 

Stock-based compensation - stock options

  —     —     1,037,399   —     1,037,399 

Stock-based compensation - IR warrants

  —     —     85,831   —     85,831 

Stock-based compensation - restricted stock units (“RSUs”)

  —     —     4,225,728   —     4,225,728 

Stock-based compensation - employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”)

  —     —     113,217   —     113,217 

Stock-based compensation - performance share units (“PSUs”)

  —     —     489,239   —     489,239 

Issuance of shares for RSUs

  304,340   3   (3  —     —   

Issuance of shares for PSUs

  1,072   —     —     —     —   

Exercise of stock options

  21,786   —     65,647   —     65,647 

Disgorgement on account of short swing profit

  —     —     12,611   —     12,611 

Cashless exercise of warrants

  128,480   1   (1  —     —   

Shares purchased from contributions to the ESPP

  46,023   —     289,787   —     289,787 

Secondary offering on November 20, 2015, net of underwriter’s discount and offering costs of $1,651,578

  3,000,005   30   19,048,426   —     19,048,456 

Net loss

  —     —     —     (27,561,702  (27,561,702
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2015

  16,298,208  $161  $107,981,695  $(78,707,180 $29,274,676 

Stock-based compensation - stock options

  —     —     1,045,081   —     1,045,081 

Stock-based compensation - restricted stock units (“RSUs”)

  —     —     5,735,032   —     5,735,032 

Stock based compensation - deferred stock units (“DSUs”)

  —     —     123,644   —     123,644 

Stock-based compensation - employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”)

  —     —     318,735   —     318,735 

Stock-based compensation - performance share units (“PSUs”)

  —     —     2,285,683   —     2,285,683 

Issuance of shares for RSUs

  519,200   5   (5  —     —   

Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of RSUs

  (20,669  —     (266,217  —     (266,217

Issuance of shares for PSUs

  209,673   2   (2  —     —   

Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of PSUs

  (3,607  —     (46,463  —     (46,463

Exercise of stock options

  130,354   1   382,350   —     382,351 

Cashless exercise of warrants

  475,683   5   (5  —     —   

Shares purchased from contributions to the ESPP

  85,356   1   727,783   —     727,784 

Issuance of shares and warrants in private placements, net of issuance costs of $211,676

  2,673,731   27   34,788,284   —     34,788,311 

Net loss

  —     —     —     (45,817,394  (45,817,394
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

  20,367,929  $202  $153,075,595  $(124,524,574 $28,551,223 

Stock-based compensation - stock options

  —     —     764,723   —     764,723 

Stock-based compensation - restricted stock units (“RSUs”)

  —     —     13,043,171   —     13,043,171 

Stock based compensation - deferred stock units (“DSUs”)

  —     —     1,362   —     1,362 

Stock-based compensation - employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”)

  —     —     331,913   —     331,913 

Stock-based compensation - performance share units (“PSUs”)

  —     —     1,661,650   —     1,661,650 

Issuance of shares for RSUs

  781,051   8   (8  —     —   

Issuance of shares for DSUs

  14,953   —     —     —     —   

Issuance of shares for PSUs

  90,000   1   (1  —     —   

Exercise of stock options

  272,205   3   979,947   —     979,950 

Cashless exercise of warrants

  19,611   —     —     —     —   

Shares purchased from contributions to the ESPP

  62,700   1   869,065   —     869,066 

Issuance of shares and warrants in private placements, net of issuance costs of $67,388

  976,139   10   14,932,537   —     14,932,547 

Net loss

  —     —     —     (49,376,875  (49,376,875
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

  22,584,588  $225  $185,659,954  $(173,901,449 $11,758,730 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Index to Financial Statements
F-4

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2014  2013 
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net loss $(45,603,110) $(5,521,081)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  371,189   4,717 
Loss on retirement of fixed assets  22,818   - 
Stock based compensation  2,547,978   16,148 
Amortization of debt discount  964,851   705,289 
Warrant expense  -   724,000 
Write-off of abandoned trademark  -   4,725 
Gain on conversion of notes payable and accrued interest  (2,084,368)  - 
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities  26,265,177   177,000 
Amortization of prepaid rent from stock issuance to landlord  20,196     
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (289,383)  (127,197)
Other assets  (15,689)  (6,959)
Accounts payable  1,354,973   359,163 
Accrued expenses  838,945   233,217 
Net cash used in operating activities  (15,606,423)  (3,430,978)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Purchase of property and equipment  (1,619,694)  (194,329)
Costs of trademark  -   (4,725)
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,619,694)  (199,054)

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2017  2016  2015 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net loss

  $(49,376,875 $(45,817,394 $(27,561,702

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to:

    

Net cash used in operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   1,309,980   957,836   817,729 

Stock based compensation

   15,802,819   9,508,175   5,951,414 

Loss on sale of property and equipment

   726   —     —   

Amortization of prepaid rent from stock issuance to landlord

   80,784   80,784   80,784 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable

   149,500   (149,500  —   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   348,275   (652,336  (157,769

Other assets

   15,995   2,823   (28,682

Accounts payable

   (2,683,073  2,382,790   608,962 

Accrued expenses

   53,530   492,616   283,530 

Deferred revenue

   (131,959  131,959   —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

   (34,430,298  (33,062,247  (20,005,734
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Purchases of property and equipment

   (817,448  (1,137,446  (1,032,795

Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment

   2,800   —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (814,648  (1,137,446  (1,032,795
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Proceeds from shares issued under shelf registration, net of underwriter’s discount and offering expenses

   —     —     19,048,456 

Net proceeds from issuance of shares to private investors

   14,932,547   34,788,311   —   

Proceeds from the exercise of stock options

   979,950   382,351   65,647 

Proceeds from contributions to employee stock purchase plan

   869,066   727,784   289,787 

Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of RSUs

   —     (266,217  —   

Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of PSUs

   —     (46,463  —   

Proceeds from the disgorgement of short-swing profit

   —     —     12,611 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

   16,781,563   35,585,766   19,416,501 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

   (18,463,383  1,386,073   (1,622,028

Cash and cash equivalents - beginning

   31,258,637   29,872,564   31,494,592 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents - ending

  $12,795,254  $31,258,637  $29,872,564 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure ofnon-cash financing activities:

    

Common stock issued for services

  $—    $—    $147,900 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Common stock issued for RSUs

  $8  $6  $3 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Common stock issued for PSUs

  $1  $2  $—   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cashless exercise of warrants

  $—    $5  $1 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Increase in accrued expenses for the purchase of property and equipment

  $—    $299,500  $—   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2014  2013 
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from the sale of common stock  -   200,681 
Payment of deferred offering cost  -   (88,319)
Repurcharse of restricted common stock  -   (29,553)
Proceeds from IPO, net of underwriter's discount and offering expenses  24,872,170   - 
Proceeds from secondary offering, net of underwriter's discount and offering expenses  20,993,759     
Proceeds from the sale of senior secured convertible notes  -   5,500,009 
Proceeds from the sale of stock to strategic investor, net  900,000   - 
Sale of warrant to IPO underwriter  1,000   - 
Net cash provided by financing activities  46,766,929   5,582,818 
         
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  29,540,812   1,952,786 
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning  1,953,780   994 
Cash and cash equivalents - ending $31,494,592  $1,953,780 
         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:        
Decrease in deferred offering costs charged to the IPO $88,319  $- 
Common stock issued upon conversion of notes payable and accrued interest payable $26,790,177  $- 
Increase in additional paid in capital upon extinguishment of derivative liability for warrants $5,752,000  $- 
Common stock issued to landlord for tenant improvements of $100,000 and prepaid rent of $400,000 $500,000  $- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Index to Financial Statements
F-6

Energous CorporationENERGOUS CORPORATION

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 1 - Business Organization, Nature of Operations

Energous Corporation (f/k/a DvineWave Inc.) (the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware on October 30, 2012 (inception).2012. The Company ishas developed a technology company focused on developing technologycalled WattUp® that can enableconsists of proprietary semiconductor chipsets, software, hardware designs and antennas that enablesRF-based wire-free charging offor electronic devices, providing power at a distance and ultimately enabling charging with complete mobility. mobility under software control. Pursuant to a Strategic Alliance Agreement with Dialog, a related party (see Note 10—Related Party Transactions), Dialog manufactures and distributes IC products incorporating the Company’sRF-based wire-free charging technology. Dialog will be the exclusive supplier of these ICs for the general market. The Company believes our proprietary technology can be utilized in a variety of devices, including wearables, Internet of Things (“IoT”) devices, smartphones, tablets,e-book readers, keyboards, mice, remote controls, rechargeable lights, cylindrical batteries and any other device with similar charging requirements that would otherwise need a battery or a connection to a power outlet.

The Company is developingusing its WattUp technology to develop solutions that charge electronic devices by surrounding them with a contained 3D RF energy pocket. The Company is engineering solutions that are expected to enable the wire-free transmission of energy from a transmittermultiple WattUp transmitters to multiple receivers at distancesWattUp receiving devices within a range of up to fifteen (15)15 feet in radius or in a circular charging envelope of up to 30 feet. The Company is also developing multiple generationsa transmitter technology to seamlessly mesh, like a network of transmitter and receiver application specific integrated circuit chips (“ASICs) whose designs will be licensedWi-Fi routers, to customers, andform a wire-free charging network that we believe will optimize our technology reducing size and cost, while increasing performance to a level that we believe will allow for themusers to be integrated into low-powercharge their devices eliminatingas they move fromroom-to-room or throughout a large space. To date, the need for a charging cord or pad to maintain charge.Company has developed multiple transmitter prototypes in various form factors and power capabilities. The Company submitted its first ASIC designhas also developed multiple receiver prototypes supporting smartphone battery cases, toys, fitness trackers, Bluetooth headsets and tracking devices, as well as stand-alone receivers.

The market for wafer fabrication in November 2013. Since then, the Company submitted transmitter and receiver ASIC designs to its wafer fabricator for production. Two of these ASICs were used to demonstrate its WattUp technology in prototypical consumer products in conjunction with its strategic partners at the Consumer Electronics Show in January 2015. Additional ASICs are under development and two of these ASICs have entered the fabrication stage.

On January 2, 2014, the board of directors and stockholders approved the name change for the Company to Energous Corporation from DvineWave Inc.

Effective March 26, 2014, pursuant to authority granted by the stockholders and the Board of Directors of the Company, the Company implemented a 1-for-3.99 reverse split ofusing the Company’s issuedtechnology is nascent and outstanding common stock (the “Reverse Split”). All shareunproven, so the Company’s success is sensitive to many factors, including technological feasibility, regulatory approval, customer acceptance, competition and per share information in these financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the Reverse Split.global market fluctuations.

Note 2 – Liquidity and Management Plans

As ofDuring the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, the Company had not yet completed the developmenthas recorded revenue of its product and had not yet recorded any revenues. Since inception, the Company’s primary activities have consisted of developing its technology, developing its business plan, raising capital, relocating to a larger facility and recruiting and hiring its workforce and executive team. To date, these activities have been funded primarily through the sale of Senior Secured Convertible Notes (“Convertible Notes”) (See Note 6- Private Placement), the funding of the Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”), which was consummated on April 2, 2014 (See Note 8 – Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)), the sale of the Company common stock to a strategic investor (See Note 8 – Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)), the issuance of common stock to our landlord (See Note 7 - Commitments and Contingencies) and the funding of the Company’s secondary offering which was consummated on December 15, 2014 (See Note 8 – Stockholder’s Equity (Deficit)).

$1,154,009. The Company has not generated revenues since its inceptionincurred a net loss of $49,376,875, $45,817,394 and had net losses of $45,603,110 and $5,521,081$27,561,702 for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively. Net cash used in operating activities was $34,430,298, $33,062,247 and $20,005,734 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company is currently meeting its liquidity requirements principally through sales of shares to three different private investors during August 2016, November 2016, December 2016 and July 2017, raising net proceeds of $49,720,858, and payments received under product development projects.

F-7

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had cash on hand of $12,795,254. The Company expects that cash on hand as of December 31, 2017, together with anticipated payments to be received under current product development projects and anticipated royalties from chip revenue, together with potential new financing activities including potential sales of stock, will be sufficient to fund the Company’s operations into the first quarter of 2019. As noted in Note 12—Subsequent Events, the Company raised $38,999,989 (net of underwriters’ discount of $1,000,000) from the sales of stock in January 2018.

Energous CorporationResearch and development of new technologies is, by its nature, unpredictable. Although the Company intends to undertake development efforts with commercially reasonable diligence, there can be no assurance that its available resources will be sufficient to enable it to develop and obtain regulatory approval of its technology

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 2 – Liquidity and Management Plans, continued

 

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had cash on hand of $31,494,592. In April 2014, the Company completed its IPO of 4,600,000 shares of common stock through which the Company raised net proceeds of approximately $24.8 million. In connection with the completion of the IPO, the Company’s outstanding convertible notes and interest accrued thereon were converted into 1,833,336 and 96,792 shares, respectively, of common stock, thus extinguishing the debt associated with the notes. On April 4, 2014, the Company issued 210,527 shares of common stock to a strategic investor upon the receipt of net proceeds of $900,000 ($300,000 received on March 27, 2014, $700,000 received on April 4, 2014 less $100,000 to MDB Capital Group as a commission ). On September 10, 2014, the Company issued 41,563 shares of common stock to the Company’s landlord as prepaid rent and tenant improvements. On November 12, 2014, the Company issued 5,353 shares of common stock to a search firm for services associated with recruiting certain employees. In December 2014, the Company completed a secondary offering of 3,285,714 shares of common stock through which the Company raised net proceeds of approximately $21.0 million. The Company expects that cash on hand as of December 31, 2014 will be sufficient to fund the Company’s operations into the second quarter of 2016.

Research and development of new technologies is, by its nature, unpredictable.  Although the Company will undertake development efforts with commercially reasonable diligence, there can be no assurance that our available resources including the net proceeds from the Company’s recently completed IPO, secondary offering, and strategic investor financing will be sufficient to enable it to develop and obtain regulatory approval of its technology to the extent needed to create future revenues sufficient to sustain its operations. The Company expects that it may choose to pursue additional financing, depending upon the market conditions, which could includefollow-on equity offerings, debt financing,co-development agreements or other alternatives.alternatives, depending upon market conditions. Should the Company choose to pursue additional financing, there is no assurance that the Companyit would be able to do so on terms that it would find acceptable.are favorable to the Company or its stockholders.

Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“USU.S. GAAP”), and pursuant to the accounting and disclosure rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaU.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported expenses during the reporting periods.

The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the valuation of the Company’s common stock, the valuation of stock-based compensation instruments, and the valuationrecognition of derivative financial instruments, the amortization of deferred financing costs,revenue, the useful lives of long-lived assets, and income tax expense. Some of these judgments can be subjective and complex, and, consequently, actual results may differ from these estimates. Although the Company believes that its estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information available at the time the estimates and assumptions were made. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

F-8

The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments with an original maturity at the date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash balances that may be uninsured or in deposit accounts that exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits. The Company maintains its cash deposits with major financial institutions.

Energous CorporationRevenue Recognition

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, collection of the revenue is reasonably assured, and the fees are fixed or determinable.

The Company records revenue associated with product development projects that it enters into with certain customers. In general, these projects are associated with complex technology development, and as such the Company does not have certainty about its ability to achieve the program milestones. Achievement of the milestone is dependent on our performance and the milestone typically needs to be accepted by the customer. The payment associated with achieving the milestone is generally commensurate with the Company’s effort or the value of the deliverable and is nonrefundable. The Company records the expenses related to these projects, generally included in research and development expense, in the periods incurred.

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

Revenue Recognition, continued

The Company also receives nonrefundable payments, typically at the beginning of a customer relationship, for which there are no milestones. The Company recognizes this revenue ratably over the initial engineering product development period. The Company records the expenses related to these projects, generally included in research and development expense, in the periods incurred.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses are charged to operations as incurred. For internally developed patents, all patent application costs are expensed as incurred as research and development expense. Patent application costs, generally legal costs, are expensed as research and development costs until such time as the future economic benefits of such patents become more certain. The Company incurred research and development costs of $12,511,647$33,230,668, $32,832,677 and $2,109,890$18,825,041 for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to employees in accordance with accounting guidance that requires awards to be recorded at their fair value on the date of grant and are amortized over the vesting period of the award. The Company recognizes compensation costs on a straight line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is typically the vesting term of the equity instrument issued.

On April 10, 2015, the Company’s board of directors approved the Energous Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), under which 600,000 shares of common stock were reserved for purchase by the Company’s employees, subject to approval by the stockholders. On May 21, 2015, the Company’s stockholders approved the ESPP. Under the plan, employees may purchase a limited number of shares of the Company’s common stock at a 15% discount from the lower of the closing market prices measured on the first and last days of each half-year period. The Company recognizes compensation expense for the fair value of the purchase options, as measured on the grant date.

Income Taxes

Tax benefits are recognized only for tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement. A liability for “unrecognized tax benefits” is recorded for any tax benefits claimed in the Company’s tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards. As of December 31, 2014,2017, no liability for unrecognized tax benefits was required to be reported. The guidance also discusses the classification of related interest and penalties on income taxes. The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. No interest or penalties were recorded during the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013.

2015. The Company files income tax returns with the United States and California governments.

Net Income (Loss)Loss Per Common Share

Basic net income (loss)loss per share is computed by dividing net income (loss)loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and, if dilutive, potential common shares

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

Net Loss Per Common Share, continued

outstanding during the period. Potential common shares consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants (using the treasury stock method), the vesting of restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and performance stock units (“PSUs”) and the exercise and/or conversionenrollment of employees in the Company’s convertible notes (using the if-converted method).ESPP. The computation of diluted loss per share excludes potentially dilutive securities of 3,261,3607,324,400, 6,975,651 and 3,525,9044,994,425 for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively, because their inclusion would be antidilutive.

Potentially dilutive securities outlined in the table below have been excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss)loss per share because the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

 

  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
  2014  2013 
Convertible Notes – principal  -   2,650,858 
Convertible Notes – accrued interest  -   100,224 
Consulting Warrant to purchase common stock  278,228   278,228 
Financing Warrant to purchase common stock  152,778   220,905 
IPO Warrants  to purchase common stock  460,000   - 
IR Consulting Warrant  36,000   - 
Options to purchase common stock  1,607,075   275,689 
RSUs  727,279   - 
Total potentially dilutive securities  3,261,360   3,525,904 

F-9

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

Fair Value Measurements

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received upon the sale of an asset or payment to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the inputs in measuring fair value as follows:  

Level 1Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3Significant unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by market data.

The assets or liability’s fair value measurement within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following table provides a summary of the liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

  Total  Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets or
Liabilities
(Level 1)
  Quoted
Prices for
Similar
Assets or
Liabilities in
Active
Markets 
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Derivative Liabilities:                
December 31, 2013:                
Conversion Feature $5,573,000  $-  $-  $5,573,000 
Financing Warrant  175,000   -   -   175,000 
Consulting Warrant  529,000   -   -   529,000 
Total $6,277,000  $-  $-  $6,277,000 

As of December 31, 2014, the Company no longer had financial instruments which were derivative liabilities.

The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis: 

  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2014
 
Beginning balance $6,277,000 
Change in fair value of conversion feature and warrants  26,265,177 
Extinguishment of derivative liability upon conversion of Convertible Notes  (26,790,177)
Extinguishment of derivative liability upon modification of Financing Warrant  (1,733,000)
Extinguishment of derivative liability upon modification of Consulting Warrant  (4,019,000)
Ending balance $- 

F-10

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

Fair Value Measurements, continued

The conversion feature of the Convertible Notes immediately prior to conversion was measured at fair value using a Monte Carlo simulation (which also represented the intrinsic value of the conversion feature) and was classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The warrant liabilities for the Financing Warrant and the Consulting Warrant, immediately prior to modification were measured at fair value using a Monte Carlo simulation and were classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The significant assumptions and valuation methods that the Company used to determine fair value and the change in fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments are discussed in Note 6 – Private Placement.

Level 3 liabilities are valued using unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the derivative liabilities. For fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the Company’s Interim Chief Financial Officer determined its valuation policies and procedures. The development and determination of the unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements and fair value calculations are the responsibility of the Company’s Interim Chief Financial Officer with support from the Company’s consultants and which are approved by the Interim Chief Financial Officer.

Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the derivative liabilities for which there is no current market for these securities such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. Changes in fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are analyzed each period based on changes in estimates or assumptions and recorded as appropriate.

The Company used a Monte Carlo model to value Level 3 financial liabilities at inception and on subsequent valuation dates, except that the conversion feature of the convertible notes immediately prior to conversion was valued at intrinsic value. This simulation incorporates transaction details such as the Company’s stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as, volatility. The Company also used a binomial simulation and Black-Scholes economic model as supplemental valuation tools in order to validate the reasonableness of the results of the Monte Carlo simulation when measuring the Financing Warrant and the Consulting Warrant.

A significant increase in the volatility or a significant increase in the Company’s stock price, in isolation, would result in a significantly higher fair value measurement. Changes in the values of the derivative liabilities were recorded in Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities within Other Expense (Income) on the Company’s Statements of Operations.

As of December 31, 2014, there were no transfers in or out of level 3 from other levels in the fair value hierarchy.

In accordance with the provisions of ASC 815, the Company presented the conversion feature and warrant liabilities at fair value on its balance sheet, with the corresponding changes in fair value recorded in the Company’s statement of operations for the applicable reporting periods.

Management determined that the results of its valuations are reasonable.

F-11

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2017   2016   2015 

Consulting Warrant to purchase common stock

   —      —      146,252 

Financing Warrant to purchase common stock

   13,889    13,889    152,778 

IPO Warrants to purchase common stock

   11,600    11,600    460,000 

IR Consulting Warrant

   —      23,250    36,000 

IR Incentive Warrant

   —      15,000    15,000 

Warrants issued to private investors

   3,035,688    2,381,675    —   

Options to purchase common stock

   1,037,239    1,309,444    1,487,785 

RSUs

   2,274,327    2,052,223    1,560,996 

PSUs

   951,657    1,153,617    1,135,614 

DSUs

   —      14,953    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total potentially dilutive securities

   7,324,400    6,975,651    4,994,425 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, "Revenue “Revenue from Contracts with Customers"Customers” (Topic 606) (“ASU2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASCASU Topic 605, "Revenue“Revenue Recognition," and most industry-specific guidance. This ASU2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The amendments inOriginally, ASU2014-09 would be effective for the ASU must be appliedCompany starting January 1, 2017 using oneeither of two methods: (i) retrospective methodsto each prior reporting period presented with the option to elect certain practical expedients as defined within ASU2014-09; or (ii) retrospective with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application and areproviding certain additional disclosures as defined per ASU2014-09. In July 2015, FASB voted to amend ASU2014-09 by approving aone-year deferral of the effective date as well as providing the option to early adopt the standard on the original effective date. There have also been multiple clarifying ASU’s issued subsequent to ASU 2014-09. This standard has an effective date of January 1, 2018, and the Company anticipates using the modified retrospective implementation method, whereby a cumulative effect adjustment is recorded to retained earnings as of the date of initial application, if needed. In preparing for annualadoption, the Company has evaluated the terms, conditions and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted.performance obligations under our existing contracts with customers. The Company will evaluatedoes not expect to have a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings, and does not anticipate that the effects, if any, that adoption of this guidancenew standard will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation." This ASU removes the definition of a development stage entity from the ASC, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from GAAP. In addition, the ASU eliminates the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statementscondition, results of operations or cash flows, and stockholders’ equity, (2) label the financial statements as thoseflows.

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 3 – Summary of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The Company elected to adopt this ASU effective with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2014 and its adoption resulted in the removal of previously required development stage disclosures.Significant Accounting Policies, continued

The FASB has issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718):Recent Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. This ASU requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance

target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. This update further clarifies that compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company elected to adopt this ASU effective with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 10, 2014 and its adoption did not have a material effect on its financial statements.Pronouncements, continued

 

In August 2014, FASB issued ASUNo. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. This standard is intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Under U.S.US GAAP, financial statements are prepared under the presumption that the reporting organization will continue to operate as a going concern, except in limited circumstances. Financial reporting under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting.

F-12

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

Recent Accounting Pronouncements, continued

The going concern basis of accounting is critical to financial reporting because it establishes the fundamental basis for measuring and classifying assets and liabilities. Currently, U.S.US GAAP lacks guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. This ASU provides guidance to an organization’s management, with principles and definitions that are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of disclosures that are commonly provided by organizations today in the financial statement footnotes. The amendments are effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted ASU2014-15 and management has made the appropriate evaluations and disclosures in Note 2 - Liquidity and Management Plans.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” This standard amends existing guidance to require the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of a deferred charge. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company has adopted ASU2015-03, and the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated withLine-of-Credit Arrangements”—Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015, which clarified the SEC staff’s position on presenting and measuring debt issuance costs incurred in connection withline-of-credit arrangements. ASU2015-15 should be adopted concurrently with the adoption of ASU2015-03. The Company has adopted ASU2015-15, and the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU2015-17”). The standard requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. ASU2015-17 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early applicationadoption is permitted. ASU2015-17 may be applied either prospectively, for all deferred tax assets and liabilities, or retrospectively. The Company has early adopted ASU2015-17 effective December 31, 2015, retrospectively. The adoption of this standard had no impact on the results of operations.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASU2016-01”). The standard addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU2016-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this new standard will have on its financial statements.

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

Recent Accounting Pronouncements, continued

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU2016-02”). This standard requires that a lessee recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from operating leases. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and aright-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. ASU2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this new standard will have on its financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” ASUNo. 2016-09 includes provisions to simplify certain aspects related to the accounting for share-based awards and the related financial statement presentation. This ASU includes a requirement that the tax effect related to the settlement of share-based awards be recorded in income tax benefit or expense in the statements of earnings. This change is required to be adopted prospectively in the period of adoption. In addition, the ASU modifies the classification of certain share-based payment activities within the statements of cash flows and these changes are required to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented, or in certain cases prospectively, beginning in the period of adoption. ASUNo. 2016-09 is effective for annual or interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company adopted ASU2016-09 effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” ASUNo. 2016-13 provides financial statement reader more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. It is effective for whichannual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company will evaluate the effects, if any, that adoption of this guidance will have on its financial statementsstatements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASUNo. 2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have not previously been issued.on its financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Restricted Cash.” ASUNo. 2016-18 requires an entity to include amounts described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling thebeginning-of-period andend-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In December 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” ASUNo. 2016-20 amends certain aspects of ASUNo. 2014-09

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

Recent Accounting Pronouncements, continued

and clarifies, rather than changes, the core revenue recognition principles in ASUNo. 2014-09. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) – Scope of Modification Accounting.” ASUNo. 2017-09 provides clarity and reduces complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718 for changes in terms or conditions of share-based payment awards. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this new standard will have on its financial statements.

In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued atwo-part Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)No. 2017-11, I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments With Down Round Features and II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests With a Scope Exception (“ASU2017-11”). ASU2017-11 amends guidance in FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, FASB ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The amendments in Part I of ASU2017-11 change the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with down round features. The amendments in Part II of ASU2017-11re-characterize the indefinite deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented as pending content in the Codification, to a scope exception. Those amendments do not have an accounting effect. ASU2017-11 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this new standard will have on its financial statements.

Management’s Evaluation of Subsequent Events

The Company evaluates events that have occurred after the balance sheet date of December 31, 2014,2017, through the date which the financial statements are issued. Based upon the review, other than asthe event disclosed in Note 12 – Subsequent Events, the Company did not identify any subsequent events that would have required adjustment or disclosure in the financial statements.

Note 4 – Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are as follows:

 

 As of   As of December 31, 
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013   2017   2016 
Computer software $459,861  $114,876   $1,418,457   $1,085,258 
Computer hardware  725,739   36,240    2,289,687    2,109,983 
Furniture and fixtures  342,452   28,458    529,287    533,175 
Leasehold improvements  343,734   14,755    613,111    613,111 
  1,871,786   194,329   

 

   

 

 
   4,850,542    4,341,527 
Less – accumulated depreciation  (356,487)  (4,717)   (3,436,625   (2,132,052
  

 

   

 

 
Total property and equipment, net $1,515,299  $189,612   $1,413,917   $2,209,475 
  

 

   

 

 

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 4 – Property and Equipment, continued

 

The Company currently uses the following expected life terms for depreciating property and equipment: computer software –1-2 years, computer hardware – 3 years, furniture and fixtures – 7 years, leasehold improvements – remaining life of the lease.

Total depreciation and amortization expense of the Company’s property and equipment was $371,189$1,309,980, $957,836 and $4,717,$817,729 for the years ended ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013, respectively, reflected within general and administrative expense.

2015, respectively.

Note 5 – Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses consist of the following:

 

  As of 
  December 31, 2014  December 31, 2013 
Accrued interest payable $-  $207,945 
Accrued compensation  425,824   19,894 
Other accrued expenses  366,525   15,784 
Total $792,349  $243,623 

F-13

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 6 – Private Placement

Senior Secured Convertible Notes

On May 16, 2013, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with accredited investors (the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of $5,500,009 principal amount of senior secured convertible notes (the “Convertible Notes”). In connection with the sale of the Convertible Notes (the “Bridge Financing”), the Company entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) and a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”) with the Investors. The closing of the Bridge Financing was completed on May 16, 2013. The Convertible Notes bore interest at 6% per annum and would have matured on August 16, 2014.

In connection with the funding of the IPO, on April 2, 2014, the principal and interest due under the Convertible Notes of $5,500,009 and $290,219, were converted into 1,833,336 and 96,792 shares, respectively, of common stock. The security agreement terminated on April 2, 2014, upon the conversion of the Convertible Notes.

Accounting for the Senior Secured Convertible Notes

Pursuant to the terms of the Convertible Notes, the conversion price was subject to adjustment in the event of an IPO, other financing and upon certain other events. The embedded conversion feature was not clearly and closely related to the host instrument and was bifurcated from the host Convertible Notes as a derivative, principally because the instrument’s variable exercise price terms would not qualify as being indexed to the Company’s own common stock. Accordingly, through April 1, 2014, this conversion feature instrument was classified as a derivative liability.  Derivative liabilities are initially recorded at fair value and are then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings during the reporting period.

The Company calculated the fair value of the embedded conversion feature of the Convertible Notes at April 2, 2014 at the conversion features’ fair value, with the observable assumptions as provided in the table below.  

  As of 
  April 2, 2014 
Stock price on valuation date $13.88 
Conversion price $3.00 
Fair value $26,790,177 

The amortization of debt discount related to the Convertible Notes was $964,851 and $705,289, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.  During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded an increase of $21,217,177 and $197,000, respectively, in the fair value of the derivative liability for the conversion feature of the Convertible Notes, which was recorded as a change in the fair value of derivative liabilities within the statement of operations. On April 2, 2014, upon the consummation of the IPO, the Convertible Notes and Accrued Interest were converted to 1,833,336 and 96,792 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock. This conversion was accounted for as an extinguishment. Accordingly, on April 2, 2014, the Company recorded a gain of $2,084,368 upon the extinguishment of the Convertible Notes, accrued interest, and the related derivative liability. Thereupon, the 1,930,128 shares of common stock were issued and were recorded at their aggregate fair value of $26,790,177.

F-14

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 6 – Private Placement, continued

Placement Agent Agreement

On January 23, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Placement Agent Agreement”) with MDB Capital Group, Inc. (“MDB”), pursuant to which the Company appointed MDB to act as the Company’s placement agent in connection with the sale of the Company’s securities (“Offering or Offerings”). Specifically, MDB was the placement agent in connection with the sale of its Convertible Notes.

In connection with the sale of the Convertible Notes, the Company paid MDB a cash fee of $538,393 and sold to MDB for $1,000 in cash, a warrant issued on May 16, 2013 (the “Financing Warrant”) to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The Financing Warrant was fully vested upon issuance, has a term of five years and may not be exercised until six months after the consummation of a qualifying firm commitment underwritten initial public offering. Pursuant to the terms of the Financing Warrant, the aggregate exercise price is fixed at $550,000, with the per share exercise price being $3.60 based upon 120% of the conversion price of $3.00 of the Convertible Notes upon the consummation of the IPO. As of December 31, 2014, the Financing Warrant was exercisable into 152,778 shares of the Company’s common stock, assuming an exercise price of $3.60 per share (or 120% of the Convertible Notes conversion price of $3.00 per share).

As originally executed and through June 24, 2014, in the event of a non-liquid exit transaction, as defined in the Financing Warrant agreement, the holder of the Financing Warrant could have put the Financing Warrant back to the Company for a cash settlement at a fair value amount that would be determined by appraisal and agreed to by both parties (the “Financing Warrant Put”). On June 25, 2014, the Financing Warrant was modified to remove the Financing Warrant put feature.

MDB shall have certain registration rights with respect to the common stock issued upon exercise of the Financing Warrant, including a onetime demand registration right with respect to such common stock.

Consulting Agreement

On January 23, 2013, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with MDB (the “Consulting Agreement”), pursuant to which MDB agreed to provide financial, strategic and intellectual property advisory services. The Consulting Agreement had an initial term of 180 days, and was renewed automatically upon the expiration of its initial term, after which it will continue in effect until it is terminated by either party with 30 days written notice to the other party. On July 11, 2014, the Company provided notice to MDB of its termination of the Consulting Agreement.

As consideration for services provided under the Consulting Agreement prior to May 16, 2013, the Company sold to MDB for $1,500 in cash, a warrant (the “Consulting Warrant”) for the purchase of an aggregate of 278,228 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Consulting Warrant was fully vested upon issuance, has a term of five years, an exercise price of $0.04 per share and may not be exercised until six months after the consummation of the IPO. The Consulting Warrant may be exercised on a cashless basis. As originally executed and through June 24, 2014, in the event of a non-liquid exit transaction, as defined in the Consulting Warrant, the holder of the Consulting Warrant could have put the Consulting Warrant back to the Company for a cash settlement at a fair value amount that would be determined by appraisal and agreed to by both parties (the “Consulting Warrant Put”). On June 25, 2014, the Consulting Warrant was modified to remove the Consulting Warrant put feature.

MDB shall have certain registration rights with respect to the common stock issued upon exercise of the Consulting Warrant, including a onetime demand registration right with respect to such common stock.

F-15

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 6 – Private Placement, continued

Accounting for the Financing Warrant and the Consulting Warrant

The Company determined that due to their cash settlement features, as originally issued, both the Financing Warrant and the Consulting Warrant qualified as derivative instruments.  Accordingly upon issuance, these instruments were classified as derivative liabilities.  Derivative liabilities are initially recorded at fair value and are then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings during the reporting period. Effective on June 25, 2014, upon the removal of the cash settlement put features within the Financing Warrant and the Consulting Warrant, (as discussed above), each of the Consulting Warrant and the Financing Warrant no longer qualified as derivative instruments. Accordingly, on June 25, 2014, after first recording a mark-to-market adjustment to fair value, the aggregate fair value of $5,752,000 for both warrants was reclassified to additional paid in capital.

The Company calculated the fair value of the Financing Warrant and the Consulting Warrant using a Monte Carlo simulation, with the observable assumptions as provided in the table below. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the reporting entity’s Financing Warrant and the Consulting Warrant are expected stock prices, levels of trading and liquidity of the Company’s common stock. Significant increases in the expected stock prices and expected liquidity would result in a significantly higher fair value measurement. Significant increases in either the probability or severity of default of the host instrument would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. 

Provided below are the principal assumptions used in the measurement of the fair values of the Financing Warrant and the Consulting Warrant as of June 24, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

  As of June 24, 2014  As of December 31, 2013 
  Financing 
Warrant
  Consulting
Warrant
  Financing
Warrant
  Consulting
Warrant
 
Stock price on valuation date $14.69  $14.69  $1.68  $1.68 
Exercise price $3.60  $0.04  $2.49  $0.04 
Term (years)  3.89   3.89   4.38   4.38 
Expected volatility  60%  60%  60%  60%
Dividend yield  0%  0%  0%  0%
Weighted average risk-free interest rate  1.33%  1.33%  1.75%  1.75%
Number of warrants  152,778   278,228   220,905   278,228 
Number of trials  20,000   20,000   20,000   20,000 
Aggregate fair value $1,733,000  $4,019,000  $175,000  $529,000 

The initial fair value of the Financing Warrant was $186,500 and was accounted for as derivative issuance expense and along with the other derivative issuance expenses (see below), was expensed upon the issuance of the Convertible Notes. The initial fair value of the Consulting Warrant was $537,500, and was expensed immediately as a consulting fee and was recorded within general and administrative expenses in the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded an increase of $5,048,000 and decrease of $20,000, respectively, in the fair values of the derivative liability of the Financing Warrant and the Consulting Warrant, which was recorded as a change in the fair value of derivative liabilities within the statement of operations.

F-16

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 6 – Private Placement, continued

Patent Assignment

On May 16, 2013, the Company entered into a patent assignment and Security Agreement with the Investors, in order to grant a continuing security interest in the patents included as collateral pledged in connection with the Convertible Notes. The security interest in the Company’s patents terminated on April 2, 2014, in connection with the conversion of the Convertible Notes.

   As of December 31, 
   2017   2016 

Accrued compensation

  $948,935   $997,908 

Accrued legal expenses

   445,684    283,160 

Accrued equipment cost

   —      299,500 

Other accrued expenses

   227,406    287,427 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,622,025   $1,867,995 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note 76 – Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

Investor Relations Agreement

Effective January 13,On September 10, 2014, the Company entered into an agreementa Lease Agreement with a vendor (“IR Firm”Balzer Family Investments, L.P. (the “Landlord”) related to provide investor relations servicesspace located at Northpointe Business Center, 3590 North First Street, San Jose, California. The initial term of the lease is 60 months, with initial monthly base rent of $36,720 and the lease is subject to certain annual escalations as defined in the Company. Pursuant to the agreement, in addition to monthly cash compensation of $8,000 per month, on March 27,agreement. On October 1, 2014, the Company relocated its headquarters to this new location. The Company issued to the IR firm a consulting warrant (“IR Consulting Warrant”) for the purchase of 36,000Landlord 41,563 shares of common stock. The IR Consulting Warrant has a strike price of $7.80, representing 130% of the IPO price. The IR Consulting Warrant had an initial catch up vesting equivalent to 3,000 shares per month of service, partial months to be prorated on a thirty (30) day basis, from the effective date of this agreement until March 27, 2014. Thereafter, the IR Consulting Warrant vested at a rate of 3,000 shares per month of service. In addition, the Company agreed to issue to the IR Firm incentive warrants (“IR Incentive Warrants”) to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock with a strike price of $7.80 in the event of and upon each qualified investor, institutional or brokerage firm purchasing at least $250,000 in value of the Company’s common sharesstock valued at $500,000, of which $400,000 will be applied to reduce the IPO price or greater in the open market on or after the 46th day following March 27, 2014. All IR Incentive Warrants granted during a sixCompany’s monthly base rent obligation by $6,732 per month period will collectively vest at each six month anniversary. Both the IR Consulting Warrant and IR Incentive Warrants will have an expiration date four (4) years from the grant date.of which $100,000 was for certain tenant improvements. The shares underlying both the IR Consulting Warrant and the IR Incentive Warrants will either be registered at the next available opportunity or the warrants will include a cashless exercise provision.

As of December 31, 2014, 34,800 shares under the IR Consulting Warrant were vested.

As of December 31, 2014 a total of 15,000 IR Incentive Warrants were deemed to have vested. Accordingly as of December 31, 2014, the Company recorded $400,000 as prepaid rent on its balance sheet, which is being amortized over the accrued valueterm of the IR Incentive Warrant of approximately $92,000 in generallease and administrative expenses, since the Company does not record stock-based compensation until the associated warrant is approved by the Board of Directors and issued. recorded $100,000 as leasehold improvements.

On February 26, 2015, the Board of Directors approvedCompany entered into asub-lease agreement for additional space in the issuance ofSan Jose, California area. The agreement has a warrant to purchase 15,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company incurred stock-based compensation expense of $263,972 in connection with the IR Consulting warrant,term which was included in general and administrative expense.

Operating Leases

On October 4, 2013, the Company executed a lease expiringexpires on June 4, 2014 for 3,562 square feet of office space in Pleasanton, California from an affiliate of Greg Brewer, one of the Company’s former directors, with30, 2019 and a base rent of $6,055 per month. The lease was amended and extended to September 30, 2014 with a basecurrent monthly rent of $8,548$6,493 per month. On August 25, 2015, the Company entered into an additional amendedsub-lease agreement for additional space in San Jose, California. The agreement has a term which expires on June 30, 2019 and a current monthly rent of $4,458 per month. These leases are subject to certain annual escalations as defined in the agreements.

On July 9, 2015, the Company entered into asub-lease agreement for additional space in Costa Mesa, California. The agreement has a term which expired on September 30, 2017 and a monthly rent of $6,376 per month. On May 31, 2017, the Company entered into a lease agreement for the period June 5, 2014 throughsame space in Costa Mesa, California. The agreement has a term that expires on September 30, 2014.2019 with initial monthly rent of $9,040 and is subject to certain annual escalations as defined in the agreement.

Index to Financial Statements
F-17

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 76 – Commitments and Contingencies, continued

Operating Leases, continued

 

The future minimum lease payments for leased locations are as follows:

For the Years Ended December 31,

  Amount 

2018

  $640,202 

2019

   457,585 
  

 

 

 

Total

  $1,097,787 
  

 

 

 

Development and Licensing Agreements

In 2015, the Company signed a development and licensing agreement with a consumer electronics company to embed WattUp wire-free charging receiver technology in various products including, but not limited to, certain mobile consumer electronics and related accessories. On September 10, 2014,March 31, 2016, the Company received payment of $500,000 pursuant to the February 15, 2016 commencement of the second phase described in the third amendment of this agreement, of which the Company recorded $108,959 and $391,041 in revenue during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company also recognized milestone revenue of $1,000,000 for both years related to this agreement.

In 2016, the Company entered into a Leasedevelopment and license agreement with a commercial and industrial supply company, under which the Company developed wire-free charging solutions. The Company recognized $44,550 and $59,400 of revenue from this agreement during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the customers from the development and license agreement accounted for approximately 100% of the Company’s revenue. As of December 31, 2017, the Company did not have an accounts receivable balance. As of December 31, 2016, the customers from these two agreements accounted for 100% of the accounts receivable balance.

Hosted Design Solution Agreement (the “Lease”)

On June 25, 2015, the Company entered into a three-year agreement to license electronic design automation software in a hosted environment. Pursuant to the agreement, under which services began July 13, 2015, the Company is required to remit quarterly payments in the amount of $100,568 with Balzer Family Investments, L.P. (the “Landlord”) relatedthe last payment due March 30, 2018. On December 18, 2015, the agreement was amended to space located at Northpointe Business Center, 3590 North First Street, San Jose, California. redefine the hardware and software configuration and the quarterly payments increased to $198,105.

Amended Employee Agreement – Stephen Rizzone

On April 3, 2015, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement with Stephen R. Rizzone, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“Employment Agreement”).

The Employment Agreement has an effective date of January 1, 2015 and an initial term of four years (the “Initial Employment Period”). The Employment Agreement provides for an annual base salary of $365,000, and Mr. Rizzone is eligible to receive quarterly cash bonuses with a total target amount equal to 100% of his base salary based upon achievement of performance-based objectives established by the lease is 60 months, with initialCompany’s board of directors.

Pursuant to Mr. Rizzone’s prior employment agreement, on December 12, 2013 Mr. Rizzone was granted a ten year option to purchase 275,689 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.68 vesting over four years

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies, continued

Amended Employee Agreement – Stephen Rizzone, continued

in 48 monthly base rent of $36,720. Oninstallments beginning October 1, 2014,2013 (“First Option”). Mr. Rizzone was also granted a second option award to purchase 496,546 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 (“Second Option”). The Second Option vests over the same vesting schedule as the First Option.

Effective May 21, 2015, with the approval by the Company’s stockholders of its new performance-based equity plan, the Employment Agreement provided and Mr. Rizzone received, a grant of 639,075 Performance Share Units (the “PSUs”). The PSUs, which represent the right to receive shares of common stock, shall be earned based on the Company’s achievement of market capitalization growth between the effective date of the Employment Agreement and the end of the Initial Employment Period. If the Company’s market capitalization is $100 million or less, no PSUs will be earned. If the Company relocatedreaches a market capitalization of $1.1 billion or more, 100% of the PSUs will be earned. For market capitalization between $100 million and $1.1 billion, the percentage of PSUs earned will be determined on a quarterly basis based on straight line interpolation. PSUs earned as of the end of a calendar quarter will be paid 50% immediately and 50% will be deferred until the end of the Initial Employment Period subject to Mr. Rizzone’s continued employment with the Company (See Note 8).

Mr. Rizzone is also eligible to receive all customary and usual benefits generally available to senior executives of the Company.

The Employment Agreement provides that if Mr. Rizzone’s employment is terminated due to his death or disability, if Mr. Rizzone’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or if he resigns for good reason, twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares subject to the First Option and the Second Option shall immediately vest and become exercisable, he will have a period of one year post-termination to exercise the First Option and the Second Option, and if a Liquidation Event (as defined in the Employment Agreement) shall occur prior to the termination of the First Option and the Second Option, one hundred percent (100%) of the shares subject to the First Option and Second Option shall immediately vest and become exercisable effective immediately prior to the consummation of the Liquidation Event. In addition, any outstanding deferred PSUs shall be immediately vested and paid, but any remaining unearned portion of the PSUs shall immediately be canceled and forfeited.

Strategic Alliance Agreement

In November 2016, the Company and Dialog, a related party (see Note 10—Related Party Transactions), entered into a Strategic Alliance Agreement (“Alliance Agreement”) for the manufacture, distribution and commercialization of products incorporating the Company’s wire-free charging technology (“Licensed Products”). Pursuant to the terms of the Alliance Agreement, the Company agreed to engage Dialog as the exclusive supplier of the Licensed Products for specified fields of use, subject to certain exceptions (the “Company Exclusivity Requirement”). Dialog agreed to not distribute, sell or work with any third party to develop any competing products without the Company’s approval (the “Dialog Exclusivity Requirement”). In addition, both parties agreed on a revenue sharing arrangement and will collaborate on the commercialization of Licensed Products based on a mutually-agreed upon plan. Each party will retain all of its headquarters to this new location.intellectual property.

The Alliance Agreement has an initial term of seven years and will automatically renew annually thereafter unless terminated by either party upon 180 days’ prior written notice. The Company issuedmay terminate the Alliance Agreement at any time after the third anniversary of the Agreement upon 180 days’ prior written notice to Dialog, or if Dialog breaches certain exclusivity obligations. Dialog may terminate the Alliance Agreement if sales of Licensed Products do not meet specified targets. The Company Exclusivity Requirement will terminate

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies, continued

Strategic Alliance Agreement, continued

upon the earlier of January 1, 2021 or the occurrence of certain events relating to the Landlord 41,563 shares ofCompany’spre-existing exclusivity obligations. The Dialog Exclusivity Requirement will terminate if no Licensed Products have received the Company’s common stock valued at $500,000, of which $400,000 will be appliednecessary Federal Communications Commission approvals within specified timeframes.

In addition to reduce the Company’s monthly base rent obligation by $6,732 per monthAlliance Agreement, the Company and of which $100,000 was for certain tenant improvements. The Company recorded $400,000 as prepaid rent on its balance sheet, which will be amortized over the term of the lease and recorded $100,000 as leasehold improvements.

The future minimum lease payments are as follows:

For the Year Ended December 31, Amount 
2015  362,555 
2016  373,432 
2017  384,635 
2018  396,174 
2019  303,766 
Thereafter  0 
Total $1,820,562 

Dialog entered into two securities purchase agreements (see Note 7 - Stockholders’ Equity).

Note 87 – Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Authorized Capital

The holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to one vote per share. Holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by the board of directors out of legally available funds. Upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets of the Company that are legally available for distribution.

SaleFiling of Common Stock

The Company entered into a stock purchase agreement dated March 7, 2014, under which a strategic investor (‘Strategic Investor”) agreed to purchase 210,527 shares of our common stock $0.0001 par value for gross proceeds of $1,000,000. On April 4, 2014, the Company issued 210,527 shares of common stock upon the receipt of the proceeds of $1,000,000 ($300,000 received on March 27, 2014, $700,000 received on April 4, 2014). In connection with this sale, the Company paid a commission of $100,000 to MDB. The shares issued are subject to a one year lock-up and a one year voting control agreement.

F-18

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 8 – Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit), continued

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation 

Registration Statement

On March 26, 2014,April 24, 2015, the Company’s boardCompany filed a “shelf” registration statement on FormS-3, which became effective on April 30, 2015. The “shelf” registration statement allows the Company from time to time to sell any combination of directors and stockholders approveddebt or equity securities described in the Second Amended and Restated Certificateregistration statement up to aggregate proceeds of Incorporation which increased the authorized shares to 60,000,000 of which 10,000,000 shares are designated as preferred stock. In addition, a special meeting of stockholders can only be called by the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President or the majority of the board of directors and shall be limited to matters relating$75,000,000.

Pursuant to the purpose or purposes stated in the notice of meeting. Any actions required, as a result of a special stockholder meeting, can only be taken upon the vote of the stockholders and not by written consent. The stockholders empowered the board of directors at any time prior to the effectiveness of the filing of this Second Amendment and Restated Certificate to abandon the proposed amendment.

Initial Public Offering

Theshelf registration, statement for the Company’s IPO was declared effective on March 27, 2014. On April 2, 2014,November 17, 2015, the Company consummated the Public Offeringan offering of 4,600,000 shares of common stock (including 600,000 shares issued pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the underwriter) at $6.00 per share and received from the underwriter net proceeds of $25,214,596 (net of underwriter’s discount of $2,208,000 and underwriter offering expenses of $177,404). The Company incurred additional offering expenses of $430,745, yielding net proceeds from the IPO of $24,783,851.

IPO Underwriter Warrant

Simultaneous with the funding of the IPO, the Company issued to the underwriter a warrant to purchase 460,000 shares of common stock (“IPO Underwriter Warrant”) at an exercise price of $7.50 per share with an expiration date of April 2, 2024. The IPO underwriter warrant was recorded net of the proceeds from the IPO.

Secondary Offering

The registration statement for the Company’s Secondary Offering was declared effective on December 15, 2014. On December 15, 2014, the Company consummated the Public Offering of 3,285,7143,000,005 shares of common stock at $7.00$6.90 per share and received from the underwriters’ net proceeds of $21,239,998$19,333,032 (net of underwriters’ discount of $1,610,000$1,242,002 and underwriters’ offering expenses of $150,000)$125,000). The Company incurred additional offering expenses of $246,239,$284,576, yielding net proceeds from the IPOoffering under shelf registration of $20,993,759.$19,048,456. Also, as noted in Note 12—Subsequent Events, the Company raised net proceeds of $38,999,989 (net of underwriters’ discount of $1,000,000) from the sales of 2,221,455 shares of stock in January 2018.

Private Placements

F-19

On August 9, 2016, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Ascend Legend Master Fund, Ltd. pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to Ascend Legend Master Fund, Ltd., and its affiliates, 1,618,123 shares of common stock at a price of $12.36 per share and a warrant to purchase up to 1,618,123 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $23.00 per share. The aggregate proceeds from the sale of these shares was $20,000,000.

Energous CorporationOn November 7, 2016, the Company and Dialog, a related party (see Note 10—Related Party Transactions), entered into a securities purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to Dialog 763,552 shares of common stock at a price of $13.0967 per share and a warrant to purchase up to 763,552 shares of common stock that may be exercised only on a cashless basis at a price of $17.0257 per share, and may be exercised at any time between the date that is six months and a day after the closing date of the transaction and the three-year anniversary of the closing date. The aggregate proceeds from the sale of these shares was $10,000,011.

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 7 – Stockholders’ Equity, continued

Private Placements, continued

On December 30, 2016, the Company and JT Group entered into a securities purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to JT Group 292,056 shares of common stock at a price of $17.12 per share. The aggregate proceeds from the sale of these shares was $4,999,975.

On June 28, 2017, the Company and Dialog Semiconductor, a related party (see Note 10 – Related Party Transactions), entered into a securities purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell Dialog 976,139 shares of common stock at a price of $15.3666 per share and a warrant to purchase up to 654,013 shares of common stock that may be exercised only on a cashless basis at a price of $19.9766 per share, and may be exercised at any time between the date that is six months and one day after the closing date of the transaction and the three-year anniversary of the closing date. The aggregate proceeds from the sale of these shares, which were issued on July 5, 2017, was $14,999,935.

Note 98 – Stock Based Compensation

Equity Incentive Plans

2013 Equity Incentive Plan

In December 2013, the Company’s board of directors and stockholders approved the “2013Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan”,Plan, providing for the issuance of equity based instruments covering up to an initial total of 1,042,167 shares of common stock. Effective on March 27, 2014, the aggregate total shares which may be issued under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan were increased to 2,335,967, as described below.

Effective on March 10, 2014, the Company’s board of directors and stockholders approved the First Amendment to the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan which provided for an increase in the aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to the Plan to equal 18% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately following the completion of the IPO (assuming for this purpose the issuance of all shares issuable under the Company’s equity plans, the conversion into common stock of all outstanding securities that are convertible by their terms into common stock and the exercise of all options and warrants exercisable for shares of common stock and including shares and warrants issued to the underwriters for such IPO upon exercise of its over-allotment options).

Effective March 27, 2014, the aggregate total shares which may be issued under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan were increased to 2,335,967.

Effective on May 19, 2016, the Company’s stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder by 2,150,000 shares, bringing the total number of approved shares to 4,485,967 under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.

As of December 31, 2014, 531,6612017, 829,515 shares of common stock remain eligible to be issued through equity basedequity-based instruments under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.

2014Non-Employee Equity Compensation Plan

On March 6, 2014, the Company’s board of directors and stockholders approved the 2014Non-Employee Equity Compensation Plan for the issuance of equity basedequity-based instruments covering up to 250,000 shares of common stock to directors and othernon-employees.

As of December 31, 2014, 211,184 shares of common stock remains eligible

Index to be issued through equity based instruments under the 2014 Non-Employee Equity Compensation Plan.

Financial Statements

Option Valuation

The Company has computed the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Option forfeitures are estimated at the time of valuation and reduce expense ratably over the vesting period. This estimate will be adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual option forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate, when it is material. The expected term used for options issued to non-employees is the contractual life and the expected term used for options issued to employees is the estimated period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The Company utilizes the “simplified” method to develop an estimate of the expected term of “plain vanilla” employee option grants. Since the Company’s stock has not been publicly traded for a sufficiently long period of time, the Company is utilizing an expected volatility figure based on a review of the historical volatilities, over a period of time, equivalent to the expected life of the instrument being valued, of similarly positioned public companies within its industry. The risk-free interest rate was determined from the implied yields from U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with a remaining term consistent with the expected term of the instrument being valued.

F-20

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 98 – Stock Based Compensation, continued

Equity Incentive Plans, continued

Stock Options

On December 12, 2013, Mr. Rizzone,Effective on May 19, 2016, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, was granted an option understockholders approved the 2013amendment and restatement of the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan to purchase 275,689increase the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder by 350,000 shares, bringing the total number of approved shares to 600,000 under the 2014Non-Employee Equity Compensation Plan.

As of December 31, 2017, 292,655 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $1.68 per share, with a term of ten years and which vests 1/48 for each completed month of service and for purposes of vesting only, the first completed month of service was determinedremain eligible to be October 2013. The option has a grant date fair value of $258,373 utilizingissued through equity-based instruments under the Black-Scholes option pricing model.2014Non-Employee Equity Compensation Plan.

2015 Performance Share Unit Plan

On January 7, 2014,April 10, 2015, the Company’s board of directors approved the Energous Corporation 2015 Performance Share Unit Plan (the “Performance Share Plan”), under which 1,310,104 shares of common stock became available for issuance as PSUs to a select group of employees and directors, subject to approval by the stockholders. On May 21, 2015 the Company’s stockholders approved the Performance Share Plan.

As of December 31, 2017, 31,951 shares of common stock remain eligible to be issued through equity based instruments under the Performance Share Unit Plan.

2017 Equity Inducement Plan

On December 28, 2017, the Board of Directors approved the 2017 Equity Inducement Plan. Under the plan, the Board of Directors reserved 600,000 shares for the grant of RSUs. These grants will be administered by a committee of the Board of Directors or the Board of Directors acting as a Committee. These awards will be granted to various employees and consultants from the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan stock options to purchaseindividuals who (a) are being hired as an aggregate of 537,845 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.49 per share and having a term of ten years. Included in these grants were 57,644 options to Michael Leabman, Chief Technical Officer, pursuant to his employment contract, 80,201 options to George Holmes, Vice President of Sales and Marketing, and 319,799 options to other employees and consultants. The option awards granted to Mr. Leabman vested 3/48ths on the date of grant, and will vest 1/48th monthly over the following 45 months. The option award granted to Mr. Holmes vested 25% on October 1, 2014 and then continues to vest 1/48th of the initial award monthly for the subsequent 36 months. Option awards granted to all other employees and consultants cliff vest 25% of the award on the later of the first anniversary of the date they started working forEmployee by the Company or October 1, 2014any Subsidiary and then will vest 1/48thsuch Award is a material inducement to such person being hired; (b) are being rehired as an Employee following a bona fide period of the initial award monthly for the following 36 months. The options had an aggregate grant date fair valueinterruption of $762,699 utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

On February 27, 2014,employment with the Company granted non-qualified stock options for the purchase of 25,979 shares of the Company’s common stock each to two new independent directorsor any Subsidiary; or (c) will become an Employee of the Company as part of their compensation for serving on the Company’s board of directors. The options have an exercise price of $3.63 per share and haveor any Subsidiary in connection with a termmerger or acquisition.

of ten years. The Options vest 25% on March 31, 2014, June 30, 2014, September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014. The options had an aggregate grant date fair value of $100,000 utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

On March 15, 2014 and March 20, 2014, the Company granted non-qualified stock options from the 2014 Non-Employee Equity Compensation Plan for the purchase of an aggregate of 34,781 shares of the Company’s common stock to two new independent directors of the Company as part of their compensation for serving on the Company’s board of directors. The options have a weighted average exercise price of $5.45 per share and have a term of ten years. The Options vest 25% on March 31, 2014, June 30, 2014, September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014. The options had an aggregate grant date fair value of $100,000 utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

On March 15, 2014,April 10, 2015, the Company’s board of directors granted to a single employee an optionapproved the ESPP, under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan to purchase 80,201which 600,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for purchase by the Company’s common stock atemployees, subject to approval by the stockholders. On May 21, 2015, the Company’s stockholders approved the ESPP. Employees may designate an amount not less than 1% but not more than 10% of their annual compensation, but for not more than 7,500 shares during an offering period. An offering period shall be six months in duration commencing on or about January 1 and July 1 of each year. The exercise price of $4.99.  Thethe option award grantedwill be the lesser of 85% of the fair market of the common stock on the first business day of the offering period and 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the applicable exercise date.

As of December 31, 2017, 405,921 shares of common stock remain eligible to be issued through equity based instruments under the ESPP. For the year ended December 31, 2017, eligible employees contributed $869,066 through payroll deductions to the employee has a tenESPP and 64,542 shares were deemed delivered for the year termended December 31, 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2016, eligible employees contributed $727,784 through payroll deductions to the ESPP and cliff vests 25% of85,356 shares were deemed delivered for the award on the anniversary of the employee’s date of hire and then will vest 1/48th of the initial award monthly during the following 36 months. The option had a grant date fair value of $229,365 utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model.year ended December 31, 2016.

On March 26, 2014, the Company’s board of directors granted

Index to Mr. Rizzone, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, an option under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan to purchase 496,546 shares of the Company’s common stock, at a price of $6.00 per share, with a term of ten years and which vests 6/48 of the award on the grant date and 1/48 of the award on the last day of each of the subsequent 42 months. The option had a grant date fair value of $1,667,784 utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Financial Statements

F-21

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 9 – Stock Based Compensation, continued

Stock Options, continued

On March 26, 2014, the Company’s board of directors granted to Michael Leabman, Chief Technical Officer, pursuant to his employment contract a stock option under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan to purchase 251,474 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $6.00.  The option award granted to Mr. Leabman has a ten year term and vests 6/48th of the award on the grant date and 1/48th of the award on the last day of each of the subsequent 42 months. The option had a grant date fair value of $844,643 utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

On March 26, 2014, the Company’s board of directors granted to Mr. Holmes a stock option under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan to purchase 89,672 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $6.00.  The option award granted to the consultant has a ten year term and vested 25% of the award on September 30, 2014 and continues to vest 1/48th of the award on the last day of each of the subsequent 36 months. The option had a grant date fair value of $303,869 utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The Company estimated the fair value of stock options awarded during the year ended December 31, 2014 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair values of stock options granted were estimated using the following assumptions:

Option Grants
Awarded During the
Year Ended
December 31, 2014
Stock price$2.49 to $6.00
Dividend yield0%
Expected volatility60%
Risk-free interest rate1.30% to 2.03%
Expected life3.75 to 6.25 years

As of December 31, 2014, the unamortized value of options held by employees was $2,611,490. As of December 31, 2014, the unamortized portion will be expensed over a weighted average period of 2.68 years.

F-22

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 98 – Stock Based Compensation, continued

 

Stock Option Award Activity

The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity during the year ended December 31, 2014:2017:

 

 Number of
Options
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life In
Years
 Intrinsic
Value
 
Outstanding, January 1, 2014  275,689  $1.68  $-   -  $- 
  Number of
Options
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life In
Years
   Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2017

   1,309,444  $4.55    7.1   $16,107,929 
Granted  1,542,477   4.63   2.60   -   -    —     —      —      —   
Exercised  -   -   -   -   -    (272,205 3.60    —      —   
Forfeited  (211,091)  2.49   1.57   -   -    —     —      —      —   
Outstanding December 31, 2014  1,607,075  $4.41  $2.46   9.0  $10,532,322 
                      

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 
Exercisable, January 1, 2014  17,231  $1.68  $-   -  $- 
Vested  533,067   4.41   -   -   - 
Exercised  -   -   -   -   - 
Forfeited  -   -   -   -   - 
Exercisable, December 31, 2014  550,298  $4.33  $2.41   9.1  $3,649,854 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

   1,037,239  $4.80    6.4   $15,198,044 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2017

   1,037,239  $4.80    6.4   $15,198,044 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

As of December 31, 2017, the unamortized value of options was $0.

The following table presents information related to stockaggregate intrinsic value of options outstandingexercised was $2,864,845, $984,144 and exercisable at$92,728 for the years ended December 31, 2014:2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Options Outstanding  Options Exercisable 
Exercise Price  Outstanding
Number of
Options
  Weighted Average
Remaining Life In
Years
  Exercisable Number of
Options
 
$1.68   275,689   8.9   86,153 
 2.49   326,754   9.0   115,627 
 3.63   51,958   9.2   51,958 
 4.99   99,214   9.2   19,013 
 6.00   853,460   9.2   277,547 
     1,607,075   9.1   550,298 

No options were granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)

On June 3, 2014,During the first quarter of 2017, the compensation committee of the board of directors of the Company(“Compensation Committee”) granted to a member of the Company’s advisory board, an RSU awardvarious directors RSUs under which the holder hasholders have the right to receive 4,035an aggregate of 48,844 shares of common stock. These awards were granted under the 2014Non-Employee Equity Compensation Plan. The awards vest fully on the first anniversary of the grant date.

During the first quarter of 2017, the Compensation Committee granted employees RSU awards under which the holders have the right to receive an aggregate of 246,000 shares of common stock. The award wasawards vest over four years beginning on the anniversary of the employee hire dates.

During the first quarter of 2017, the Compensation Committee granted various employees RSU awards under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan under which the holders have the right to receive an aggregate of 351,080 shares of common stock. The awards vest over terms from two to four years.

During the second quarter of 2017, the Compensation Committee granted various consultants RSUs under which the holders have the right to receive an aggregate of 8,400 shares of common stock. These awards were granted under the 2014Non-Employee Equity Compensation Plan. The awards vest over terms from two to four years.

During the second quarter of 2017, the Compensation Committee granted employees RSU had a grant date fair valueawards under which the holders have the right to receive an aggregate of $49,590 based upon the fair value120,000 shares of common stock. A majority of the Company’s common stockawards vest over four years beginning on the date of grant. This RSU had 1,513 shares vested as of December 31, 2014 and vests 504 shares on eachanniversary of the next five succeeding three month anniversaries of the grant date.employee hire dates.

Index to Financial Statements
F-23

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 98 – Stock Based Compensation, continued

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”), continued

 

On July 14, 2014,During the compensation committeesecond quarter of 2017, the board of directorsCompensation Committee granted to George Holmes anemployees RSU under which the holder has the right to receive 44,836 shares of the Company’s common stock. The award was grantedawards under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan. The RSU had a grant date fair value of $593,180 based upon the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The award granted to Mr. Holmes vests 25% on March 28, 2015 and then 25% annually until fully vested. March 28, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the award, the shares not vested terminate upon separation from the Company.

On July 14, 2014, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted to various employees and consultants, RSUsPlan under which the holders have the right to receive 228,500an aggregate of 308,059 shares of the Company’s common stock. TheseThe awards werevest over terms from two to four years.

During the third quarter of 2017, the Compensation Committee granted employees RSU awards under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and the RSU’s had an aggregate grant date fair value of $3,023,055 based upon the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The awards granted vest 25% on March 28, 2015 and then 25% annually until fully vested on March 28, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the awards, the shares not vested terminate upon separation from the Company.

On August 14, 2014, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted to various employees and consultants, RSUs under which the holders have the right to receive 86,823an aggregate of 117,514 shares of the Company’s common stock. TheseThe awards werevest over terms from two to four years.

During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Compensation Committee granted employees RSU awards under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and the RSU’s had an aggregate grant date fair value of $981,100 based upon the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The awards granted vest over four years beginning on the first anniversary of the employee’s date of hire. Pursuant to the terms of the awards, the shares not vested terminate upon separation from the Company.

In addition, on August 14, 2014, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted two inducement RSU awards to Cesar Johnston, the Company’s Senior Vice President of Engineering. Under the first award, Mr. Johnston has the right to receive 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and this award vests over four years beginning on the first anniversary of his employment start date of July 14, 2014. In addition, Mr. Johnston was granted 20,000 performance based RSU awards. On February 26, 2015, the compensation committee of the board of director determined that Mr. Johnston had successfully met all conditions provided for in the performance based RSU award. The RSU’s had an aggregate grant date fair value of $1,356,000 based upon the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The awards granted vest over four years beginning on the first anniversary of the employee’s date of hire. Pursuant to the terms of the awards, the shares not vested terminate upon separation from the Company.

On November 13, 2014, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted inducement RSU awards to various employees and consultants, under which the holders have the right to receive 261,686an aggregate of 53,188 shares of the Company’s common stock. These inducement awards were not granted under a plan. These RSUs had an aggregate grant date fair value of $2,266,201 based upon the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Pursuant to the termsA majority of the awards the shares are not vested upon separation from the Company.

In addition, on November 13, 2014, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted to various employees and consultants, RSUs under which the holders have the right to receive 5,100 shares of the Company’s common stock. These awards were granted under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan as an incentive reward for being a named inventor on one or more of the Company’s patent applications, and the RSUs had an aggregate fair value of $44,166 based upon the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Pursuant to the terms of the awards, the shares vested immediately upon grant and common stock delivery is one year from the related patent application date.

F-24

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 9 – Stock Based Compensation, continued

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”), continued

On December 24, 2014, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted inducement RSU awards to various employees and consultants, under which the holders have the right to receive 77,856 shares of the Company’s common stock. These inducement awards were not granted under a plan. These RSUs had an aggregate grant date fair value of $620,512 based upon the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The awards granted vest over a four years beginning on the first anniversary of the employee’s date of hire. Pursuant to the terms of the awards, the shares not vested terminate upon separation from the Company.

On December 24, 2014, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted an RSU award to a consultant, under which the holder has the right to receive 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. This award was granted under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and had a grant date fair value of $39,850 based upon the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The awards granted vest over four years beginning on the first anniversary of the employee’s date of hire. Pursuant to the terms of the awards, the shares not vested terminate upon separation from the Company.

year term.

The Company accounts for RSUs granted to consultants using the accounting guidance included in ASC505-50 “Equity-Based Payments toNon-Employees” (“ASC505-50”). In accordance with ASC505-50, the Company estimates the fair value of the unvested portion of the RSU award each reporting period using the closing price of the Company’s common stock.

At December 31, 2014,2017, the unamortized value of the RSUs was $6,734,336.$24,701,605. The unamortized amount will be expensed over a weighted average period of 3.472.7 years. A summary of the activity related to RSUs for the year ended December 31, 20142017 is presented below:

 

  Total  Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair
Value
  Total Grant
Date Fair Value
 
Nonvested at January 1, 2014  -  $-  $- 
RSU Granted  837,672   10.75   9,006,874 
RSUs vested  (6,349)  9.94   (63,116)
RSUs forfeited  (104,044)  12.57   (1,308,067)
Nonvested at December 31, 2014  727,279   10.50  $7,635,691 
Vested at December 31, 2014  6,349  $9.94  $63,116 
   Total   Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2017

   2,052,223   $11.58 

RSUs granted

   1,253,085   $15.81 

RSUs forfeited

   (249,928  $12.63 

RSUs vested

   (781,055  $11.53 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

   2,274,325   $13.75 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

F-25

Performance Share Units (“PSUs”)

Energous CorporationPerformance share units (“PSUs”) are grants that vest upon the achievement of certain performance goals. The goals are commonly related to the Company’s market capitalization or market share price of the common stock.

(f/k/The PSUs originally issued during 2015 to certain board members and senior management shall be earned based on the Company’s achievement of market capitalization growth between the effective date of the Employment Agreement and the end of the Initial Employment Period. If the Company’s market capitalization is $100 million or less, no PSUs will be earned. If the Company reaches a DvineWave Inc.)market capitalization of $1.1 billion or more, 100% of the PSUs will be earned. For market capitalization between $100 million and $1.1 billion, the percentage of PSUs earned will be determined on a quarterly basis based on straight line interpolation.

The Company determined that the PSUs were equity awards with both market and service conditions. The Company utilized a Monte Carlo simulation to determine the fair value of the market condition, as described

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 98 – Stock Based Compensation, continued

Performance Share Units (“PSUs”), continued

below. Grantees of PSUs are required to be employed through December 31, 2018 in order to earn the entire award, if and when vested. No PSUs were granted during the year ended December 31, 2017.

   Performance Share
Units (PSUs) Granted
During the Year Ended
December 31, 2016
 

Market capitalization

  $106,600,000 

Dividend yield

   0

Expected volatility

   75

Risk-free interest rate

   1.04

The fair value of the grants of PSUs to purchase a total of 1,342,061 shares of common stock (including 1,278,153 PSUs granted under the 2015 Performance Share Unit Plan and 63,908 granted as an inducement) was determined to be approximately $3,218,000, and is amortized over the service period of May 21, 2015 through December 31, 2018, on a straight-line basis.

On October 24, 2016, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted Mr. Rizzone a PSU award under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan under which Mr. Rizzone has the right to receive 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The shares of this award vest upon the Company’s stock price meeting specific targets.

For the PSU award grant issued to Mr. Rizzone, a Monte Carlo simulation was used to determine the fair value at each of the five target prices of the Company’s common stock, using a market capitalization of $298,857,000, dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 75% and a risk-free interest rate of 0.66%.

The fair value of the PSUs granted to Mr. Rizzone under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan was determined to be $2,332,000, and is amortized over the estimated service period from October 24, 2016 through October 30, 2017.

Amortization for all PSU awards was $1,661,650 and $2,285,683 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

At December 31, 2017, the unamortized value of all PSUs was approximately $819,910. The unamortized amount will be expensed over a weighted average period of 1.0 years. A summary of the activity related to PSUs for the year ended December 31, 2017 is presented below:

   Total   Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2017

   1,153,617   $3.66 

PSUs granted

   —     $—   

PSUs forfeited

   (111,960  $2.62 

PSUs vested

   (90,000  $13.82 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

   951,657   $2.65 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred Stock Units (“DSUs”)

On January 4, 2016, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted to John Gaulding, director and chairman of the board, DSUs under the 2014Non-Employee Equity Compensation Plan for which

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 8 – Stock Based Compensation, continued

Deferred Stock Units (“DSUs”), continued

Mr. Gaulding has the right to receive 14,953 shares of the Company’s common stock. These shares were issued to Mr. Gaulding in lieu of $125,000 of his anticipated compensation for his services on the board, including $75,000 worth of DSUs and $50,000 of his regular board stipends. The award granted vests fully on the first anniversary of the grant date. Amortization was $1,362 and $123,644 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

At December 31, 2017, the unamortized value of the DSUs was $0. A summary of the activity related to DSUs for the year ended December 31, 2017 is presented below:

   Total   Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2017

   14,953   $8.36 

DSUs granted

   —     $—   

DSUs forfeited

   —     $—   

DSUs vested

   (14,953  $8.36 
  

 

 

   

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

   —     $—   
  

 

 

   

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”)

During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were two offering periods for the ESPP. The first offering period started on January 1, 2017 and concluded on June 30, 2017. The second offering period started on July 1, 2017 and concluded on December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2016, there were also two offering periods for the ESPP. The first offering period started on January 1, 2016 and concluded on June 30, 2016. The second offering period started on July 1, 2016 and concluded on December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2015, there was one initial offering period for the ESPP which started on July 1, 2015 and concluded on December 31, 2015.

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the purchase option for each designated share purchased under this plan was approximately $5.42, $5.20 and $2.46 during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which represents the fair value of the option, consisting of three main components: (i) the value of the discount on the enrollment date, (ii) the proportionate value of the call option for 85% of the stock and (iii) the proportionate value of the put option for 15% of the stock. The Company recognized compensation expense for the plan of $331,913, $318,735 and $113,217 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 8 – Stock Based Compensation, continued

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), continued

The Company estimated the fair value of the purchase options granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair values of the purchase options granted were estimated using the following assumptions:

   For the Year Ended
December 31, 2017
 

Stock price range

  $16.08  -17.59 

Dividend yield

   0

Expected volatility range

   56 – 66

Risk-free interest rate range

   0.62 – 1.11

Expected life

   6 months 
   For the Year Ended
December 31, 2016
 

Stock price range

  $8.36 – 12.16 

Dividend yield

   0

Expected volatility range

   56 – 100

Risk-free interest rate range

   0.37 – 0.49

Expected life

   6 months 
   For the Year Ended
December 31, 2015
 

Stock price

  $7.41 

Dividend yield

   0

Expected volatility

   65

Risk-free interest rate

   0.13

Expected life

   6 months 

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

The following tables summarize total stock basedstock-based compensation costs recognized for the yearyears ended December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013.2015:

 

 Year Ended December 31,   For the Years Ended December 31, 
 2014 2013   2017   2016   2015 
Stock options $1,333,943  $16,148   $764,723   $1,045,081   $1,037,399 
RSUs  900,063   -    13,043,171    5,735,032    4,225,728 
IR warrant  263,972   - 
Shares issued to consultant for services rendered  50,000   - 

PSUs

   1,661,650    2,285,683    489,239 

DSUs

   1,362    123,644    —   

ESPP

   331,913    318,735    113,217 

IR warrants

   —      —      85,831 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 
Total $2,547,978  $16,148   $15,802,819   $9,508,175   $5,951,414 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 8 – Stock Based Compensation, continued

Stock-Based Compensation Expense, continued

 

The total amount of stock-based compensation was reflected within the statements of operations as:

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2014  2013 
Research and development $924,702  $- 
General and administrative  1,040,038   16,148 
Sales and marketing  583,238   - 
Total $2,547,978  $16,148 

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2017   2016   2015 

Research and development

  $8,522,798   $4,226,304   $2,816,707 

Sales and marketing

   1,113,120    328,760    729,329 

General and administrative

   6,166,901    4,953,111    2,405,378 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $15,802,819   $9,508,175   $5,951,414 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note 10 -9 – Income Taxes

AsOn December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Tax Act”) was enacted. The 2017 Tax Act includes a number of changes to existing U.S. tax laws that impact the company, most notably a reduction of the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. The company measures deferred tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that will apply in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or paid. Accordingly, the company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were remeasured to reflect the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, resulting in a $19,432,000 decrease in net deferred tax assets for the year ended December 31, 2017 and a corresponding $19,432,000 decrease in valuation allowance as of December 31, 2014 and 2013,2017.

The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) to address the Company’sapplication of U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the 2017 Tax Act enactment date for companies to complete the accounting for the income tax effects of certain elements of the 2017 Tax Act. In accordance with SAB 118, we have recognized the provisional tax impacts related to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets (liabilities) consistedand liabilities and included these amounts in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The ultimate impact may differ from these provisional amounts, possibly materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions we have made, additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, and actions we may take as a result of the effects of temporary differences attributable2017 Tax Act.

Index to the following:

Financial Statements

  December 31, 
Deferred tax assets (liabilities): 2014  2013 
Tax credit and net operating loss carryovers $3,191,795  $900,830 
Property and equipment  (20,282)  - 
Research and development costs  5,820,399   845,900 
Start-up and organizational costs  1,443   1,554 
Stock-based compensation  448,893   647 
Other accruals  188,439   90,680 
Total gross deferred tax assets  9,630,687   1,839,611 
Less: valuation allowance  (9,630,687)  (1,839,611)
Deferred tax assets, net $-  $- 

F-26

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 10 -9 – Income Taxes, continued

 

As of December 31, 2017, and 2016, the Company’s deferred tax assets (liabilities) consisted of the effects of temporary differences attributable to the following:

   December 31, 
   2017   2016 

Deferred tax assets (liabilities):

    

Tax credit

  $4,335,394   $2,802,573 

Net operating loss carryovers

   23,630,008    16,174,712 

Property and equipment

   99,756    (58,747

Research and development costs

   15,372,328    18,628,913 

Start-up and organizational costs

   774    1,222 

Stock-based compensation

   2,473,591    1,829,843 

Other accruals

   260,113    341,090 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total gross deferred tax assets

   46,171,964    39,719,606 

Less: valuation allowance

   (46,171,964   (39,719,606
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred tax assets, net

  $—     $—   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The change in the Company’s valuation allowance is as follows:

 

  2014  2013 
January 1, $1,839,611  $8,472 
Increase in valuation allowance  7,791,076   1,831,139 
December 31, $9,630,687  $1,839,611 

   2017   2016 

January 1,

  $39,719,606   $22,085,888 

Increase in valuation allowance

   6,452,358    17,633,718 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31,

  $46,171,964   $39,719,606 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Company has afederal and state net operating loss carryovercarryovers of approximately $5,815,000$84,418,000 and a$85,515,000, respectively, available to offset future taxable income. The federal and state NOL carryforwards will expire at various dates beginning in 2033. The Company has federal and state research and development tax credit carryovercarryovers of approximately $878,000 that$2,686,000 and $2,088,000, respectively. The federal R&D credit carryovers will expire beginning in 2032.2032 and state R&D credit carryovers do not expire. The ultimate realization of the net operating loss is dependent upon future taxable income, if any, of the Company and may be limited in any one period by alternative minimum tax rules. Although management believes that the Company may have sufficient future taxable income to absorb the net operating loss carryovers and research and development tax credit carryovers before the expiration of the carryover period, there may be circumstances beyond the Company’s control that limit such utilization. Accordingly, management has determined that a full valuation allowance of the deferred tax asset is appropriate at December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 9 – Income Taxes, continued

 

Internal Revenue Code Section 382 imposes limitations on the use of net operating loss carryovers when the stock ownership of one or more 5% shareholders (shareholders owning 5% or more of the Company’s outstanding capital stock) has increased on a cumulative basis by more than 50 percentage points. Management cannot control the ownership changes occurring as a result of public trading of the Company’s Common Stock. Accordingly, there is a risk of an ownership change beyond the control of the Company that could trigger a limitation of the use of the loss carryover. AsThe Company completed a Section 382 analysis as of December 31, 2014, the Company has not completed an analysis whether an ownership change occurred under Section 382, which, if it did occur, could substantially limit2017 and determined that none of its ability in the future to utilize its net operating loss and other tax carryforwards.NOLs or R&D credits would be limited.

 

F-27

Energous Corporation

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes to Financial Statements

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
           2017                  2016         

Tax benefit at federal statutory rate

   (34.0)%   (34.0)% 

State income taxes

   (10.2  (5.7

Permanent differences:

   

Stock-based compensation

   (2.5  0.8 

Meals and entertainment

   0.1   0.1 

True-up of federal deferred taxes

   (2.8  1.7 

True-up of state deferred taxes

   —     1.2 

Change in effective tax rate

   39.4   —   

Research and development tax credit, federal

   (1.4  (1.5

Research and development tax credit, state

   (1.6  (1.1

Increase in valuation allowance, federal

   1.3   32.9 

Increase in valuation allowance, state

   11.7   5.6 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effective income tax rate

   0.0  0.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Note 10 - Income Taxes, continued

  For the Year
Ended
December 31,
2014
  For the Year
Ended
December 31,
2013
 
Tax benefit at federal statutory rate  (34.0)%  (34.0)%
State income taxes  (5.8)  (5.8)
Permanent difference:        
Stock-based compensation  1.1   0.1 
Derivative instrument issuance - financing warrant  -   1.3 
Change in fair value of derivative liability  22.9   1.3 
General and administrative expense - consulting warrant  -   3.9 
Amortization of debt discount  0.8   - 
Gain on debt extinguishment  (1.8)  - 
Other  0.6   - 
Federal research and development tax credit  (0.9)  - 
Increase in valuation allowance  17.1   33.2 
Effective income tax rate  0.0%  0.0%

Note 11 – Related Parties

On October 4, 2013, the Company executed a lease expiring on June 4, 2014 for 3,562 square feet of office space in Pleasanton, California from an affiliate of Greg Brewer, one of the Company’s former directors, with a base rent of $6,055 per month. The lease was amended and extended to September 30, 2014 with a base monthly rent of $8,548 for the period June 5, 2014 through September 30, 2014.

Party Transactions

On July 14, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed Howard Yeaton as the Company’s Interim Chief Financial Officer. On July 13, 2015, the Company appointed Brian Sereda as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, replacing Interim Chief Financial Officer Howard Yeaton. Howard Yeaton is the Managing Principal of Financial Consulting Strategies LLC (“FCS”). During the yearyears ended December 31, 2014,2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company has paid to FCS $68,413had incurred fees of $0, $0 and $61,848 in connection with HowardMr. Yeaton’s services as Interim Chief Financial OfficerOfficer. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and $126,1532015, the Company incurred fees of $0, $13,306 and $88,813 for other financial advisory and accounting services provided by FCS.

In November 2016, the Company and Dialog Semiconductor plc (“Dialog”) entered into an Alliance Agreement for the manufacture, distribution and commercialization of products incorporating the Company’s wire-free charging technology (See Note 6 - Commitments and Contingencies,Strategic Alliance Agreement). On November 7, 2016 and June 28, 2017, the Company and Dialog entered into securities purchase agreements under which Dialog acquired a total of 1,739,691 shares and received warrants to purchase up to 1,417,565 shares (See Note 7 - Stockholders’ Equity,Private Placements). Dialog presently owns approximately 7.7% of the Company’s outstanding common shares, and could potentially own approximately 13.2% of the Company’s outstanding common shares if it exercised all of its warrants for common shares. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company paid $516,725 to Dialog for chip development costs incurred, which is recorded under research and development expense.

Index to Financial Statements

ENERGOUS CORPORATION

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 11 – Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information

Summarized quarterly information for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is listed below:

   For the quarter ended 
   March 31  June 30  September 30  December 31 

2017

     

Revenue

  $575,368  $299,506  $250,000  $29,135 

Operating expenses

  $13,051,387  $13,220,879  $13,001,623  $11,267,948 

Net loss

  $(12,473,140 $(12,919,010 $(12,748,248 $(11,236,477

Loss per share, basic and diluted

  $(0.61 $(0.63 $(0.58 $(0.50

2016

     

Revenue

  $136,364  $181,818  $1,003,973  $129,786 

Operating expenses

  $10,936,772  $10,468,990  $11,131,994  $14,744,905 

Net loss

  $(10,796,542 $(10,284,555 $(10,125,063 $(14,611,234

Loss per share, basic and diluted

  $(0.66 $(0.62 $(0.57 $(0.75

Note 12 – Subsequent Events

Development and Licensing Agreement

EffectiveDuring January 28, 2015,2018, the Company signed a development and licensing agreement with a consumer electronics company to embed WattUp wire-free charging receiver technology in various products including, but not limited to mobile consumer electronics and related accessories. Duringraised $38,999,989 (net of underwriters’ discount of $1,000,000) from the development phase and through customer shipmentsale of their first product, Energous will afford this customer an exclusive time to market advantage in the licensed product categories.

This development and licensing agreement contains both invention and development milestones that the Company will need to achieve during the next two years. Pursuantstock to the Agreement,public in an“at-the-market” equity offering of its common stock.

In March 2018, the Company will receive development payments based upon its achievementCompany’s Board of milestones, as provided for inDirectors (“Board”), on the Agreement, including the receipt of an initial payment of $500,000 earned upon the signingrecommendation of the Agreement.

F-28

Board’s Compensation Committee (“Compensation Committee”), approved the Energous Corporation MBO Bonus Plan (“Bonus Plan”) for executive officers of the Company. To be eligible to receive a bonus under the Bonus Plan, an executive officer must be continuously employed throughout the applicable performance period, and in good standing, and achieve the performance objectives selected by the Compensation Committee.

(f/k/a DvineWave Inc.)

Notes

Index to Financial Statements

Note 12 – Subsequent Events, continued

Grants of RSUs

On January 22, 2015, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted to various employees and consultants, RSUs under which the holders have the right to receive 54,500 shares of the Company’s common stock. The awards granted were vested on the date of grant.

On February 26, 2015, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted to two employees RSUs under which the holders have the right to receive 6,800 shares of the Company’s common stock. The awards granted were vested on the date of grant.

On February 26, 2015, the compensation committee of the board of directors granted to Mr. Rizzone, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, RSUs under which Mr. Rizzone has the right to receive 246,226 shares of the Company’s common stock. The awards were granted under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and vest over four years beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

Issuance of Common Stock

On February 4, 2015, the Company entered into an advisory agreement with Insight Capital Consultants Corporation (“Insight”), pursuant to which, on February 26, 2015, the Company issued to Insight 15,000 shares of common stock.

Lease Agreement

On February 26, 2015, the Company entered into a sub-lease agreement for additional space in the San Jose area. The agreement has a term which expires on June 30, 2019 at an initial monthly rent of $6,109 per month.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to us is made known to the officers who certify our financial reports and the board of directors.

Based on their evaluation as of December 31, 2014,2017, our principal executive and principal financial and accounting officers have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Exchange Ac)Act) were effective as of December 31, 20142017 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and that material information relating to the Company is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule13a-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting is a process used to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our board of directors and management; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

An internal control system over financial reporting has inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

The Company’s management, under the supervision of and with the participation of the principal executive and principal financial and accounting officers, have assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20142017 based on criteria for effective control over financial reporting described in Internal Control —Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) created by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, the Company’s management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014.2017.

This annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting as such report is not required for non-accelerated filers.at this time under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012.

Index to Financial Statements

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

For the quarteryear ended December 31, 2014,2017, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving its objectives. Our principal executive and principal financial and accounting officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at that reasonable assurance level.

Item 9B. Other Information.

Approval of Energous Corporation MBO Bonus Plan

Not applicable.On March 15, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors (“Board”), on the recommendation of the Board’s Compensation Committee (“Compensation Committee”), approved the Energous Corporation MBO Bonus Plan (“Bonus Plan”) for executive officers of the Company. To be eligible to receive a bonus under the Bonus Plan, an executive officer must be continuously employed throughout the applicable performance period, and in good standing, and achieve the performance objectives selected by the Compensation Committee.

Under the Bonus Plan, the Compensation Committee is responsible for selecting the amounts of potential bonuses for executive officers, the performance metrics used to determine whether any such bonuses will be paid, and determining whether those performance metrics have been achieved.

The Compensation Committee may select one or more performance metrics from among the following measures, in any combination, on a GAAP ornon-GAAP basis, and measured, on an absolute basis or relative to apre-established target.

(a) Bookings or billings;

(b) Revenue or net revenue;

(c) Gross profit or gross margin;

(d) Operating income and Operating margin;

(e) Net income;

(f) Operating expenses or operating margin;

(g) Net income;

(h) Earnings (which may include earnings before interest and taxes, earnings before taxes, net earnings, stock-based compensation expenses, depreciation and amortization), including earnings per share;

(i) Total stockholder return;

(j) Market share;

(k) Return on assets or net assets;    

(l) The Company’s stock price;

(m) Growth in stockholder value relative to apre-determined index;

(n) Return on equity;

Index to Financial Statements

(o) Return on invested capital;

(p) Cash flow (including free cash flow or operating cash flows)

(q) Cash conversion cycle;

(r) Economic value added;

(s) Individual confidential business objectives;

(t) Contract awards or backlog;

(u) Expense reduction;

(v) Credit rating;

(w) Strategic plan development and implementation;

(x) Succession plan development and implementation;

(y) Improvement in workforce diversity;

(z) Customer satisfaction;

(aa) New product invention or innovation;

(bb) Attainment of research and development milestones;

(cc) Improvements in productivity;

(dd) Balance of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities;

(ee) Completion of an identified special project;

(ff) Completion of a joint venture or other corporate transaction;

(gg) Employee satisfaction and/or retention;

(hh) Research and development expenses;

(ii) Working capital targets and changes in working capital;

(jj) Completion of a goal within an existing contract;

(kk) Revenue related to a particular product, service or customer; group of products services, or customers or type of products, services or customers;

(ll) Attainment of regulatory goals or milestones;

(mm) Attainment of any phase of a development, design, fabrication, production or fulfillment goal;

(nn) Customer acquisition, retention or engagement;

(oo) Completion of financing goals; and

(pp) Any other metric that is capable of measurement as determined by or suggested to the Committee.

Approval of Severance and Change in Control Agreement

On March 15, 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a form of Severance and Change in Control Agreement (“SeveranceAgreement”) that the Company may enter into with executive officers (“Executives”).

Under the Severance Agreement, if an Executive is terminated in a qualifying termination, the Company agrees to pay the Executive six to 12 months of that Executive’s monthly base salary. If Executive elects continued coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended (“COBRA”) the Company will pay the full amount of Executive’s premiums under the Company’s health, dental and vision plans, including coverage for the Executive’s eligible dependents, for the six to 12 month period following the Executive’s termination.

Index to Financial Statements

If an Executive is terminated in a change in control qualifying termination (“CICQualifyingTermination”), as defined in the Severance Agreement, the Company agrees to pay the Executive: six to 12 months of the Executive’s monthly base salary, and an amount up to 100% of the Executive’s target bonus, and a prorated bonus for the year in which such CIC Qualifying Termination occurs. Finally, the Company will have the ability to allow 0 to 100% of the executive’s unvested time or performance based equity awards, as defined in the severance agreement, to become fully vested.

The Executive’s potential COBRA benefits under a CIC Qualifying Termination are the same as for a qualifying termination above. Additionally, in the case of a CIC Qualifying Termination, each of Executive’s then-outstanding unvested equity awards, as defined in the Severance Agreement and including awards that would otherwise vest only upon satisfaction of performance criteria, accelerate and become vested and exercisable with respect to 100% of the then unvested shares subject to all equity awards.

Under the Severance Agreement, the Executive agrees to sign a general release of claims, and to cooperation andnon-disparagement covenants lasting six months after the Executive’s termination. The Severance Agreement terminates three years after its effective date.

Index to Financial Statements

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information required under this item is incorporated by reference to the following sections of our proxy statement for our 20142018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: “Information Concerning Directors and Nominees for Director,“Executive Compensation,” “Information Concerning Executive Officers,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters,” and “The Board of Directors and Itsits Committees.”

Item 11. Executive Compensation

TheAdditional information required under this item is incorporated by reference to the following sections of our proxy statement for our 20142018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: “Compensation and Other Information Concerning Directors and Officers,“Executive Compensation,” and “The Board of Directors and Itsits Committees.”

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters.

The information required under this item is incorporated by reference to the following sections of our proxy statement for our 20142018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: “Equity Compensation Plan Information”“Executive Compensation” and “Securities Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required under this item is incorporated by reference to the following sections of our proxy statement for our 20142018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters.”

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required under this item is incorporated by reference to the following sections of our proxy statement for our 20142018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Pre-Approval“Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.”

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules

 

(a)List of documents filed as part of this report:

 

1.Financial Statements (see “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” at Item 8 and incorporated herein by reference).

 

2.Financial Statement Schedules (Schedules to the Financial Statements have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the accompanying Financial Statements or notes thereto)

 

3.Exhibit Index (The exhibits required

Index to Financial Statements

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit

No.

Description of Document

3.1Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Energous Corporation (incorporated by reference to beExhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1/A (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on March 13, 2014)
3.2Amendment No.  1 to the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Energous Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on May  14, 2014)
3.3Amended and Restated Bylaws of Energous Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No.  1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1/A (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on March 13, 2014)
4.1Specimen Certificate representing shares of common stock of Energous Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1/A (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on March 21, 2014)
4.2Amended and Restated Warrant issued to MDB Capital Group, LLC(ARW-1) dated December  13, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1 (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on January  24, 2014)
4.3Amended and Restated Warrant issued to MDB Capital Group, LLC(ARW-2) dated December  13, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1 (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on January  24, 2014)
4.4Form of Underwriter’s Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Amendment No.  2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1/A (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on March 21, 2014)
4.5Form of Amendment to Warrant to Purchase Common Stock Dated June  25, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on August 13, 2014
10.1Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Michael Leabman dated October  1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1 (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on January  24, 2014)*
10.2Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1 (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)*
10.3Energous Corporation 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1 (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)*
10.4Form of stock option award under 2013 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1 (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)*
10.5Form ofNon-Statutory Option Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1/A (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on March 13, 2014)*
10.6First Amendment to Energous Corporation 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Amendment No.  1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1/A (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on March 13, 2014)*
10.72014Non-Employee Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1/A (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on March 13, 2014)*


Index to Financial Statements

Exhibit

No.

Description of Document

10.8Form of stock option award under 2014Non-Employee Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1/A (FileNo. 333-193522) filed on March 21, 2014)*
10.9Offer Letter effective as a part of thisJuly  14, 2014 between Energous Corporation and Cesar Johnston (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report are listedon Form10-Q filed on November 10, 2014)*
10.10Consulting Agreement effective as of July  14, 2014 between Energous Corporation and Howard Yeaton (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on November 10, 2014)*
10.11Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement effective as of August  14, 2014 between Energous Corporation and Cesar Johnston (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on November 10, 2014)*
10.12Lease Agreement dated as of September  10, 2014 between the Company and Balzer Family Investments, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on September 16, 2014)
10.13Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2013 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed on March 30, 2015)*
10.14Form of Inducement Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed on March 30, 2015)*
10.15Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated as of April  3, 2015 between the Company and Stephen R. Rizzone (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on April 9, 2015)*
10.16Energous Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on May 22, 2015)*
10.17Energous Corporation 2015 Performance Unit Share Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on May 22, 2015)*
10.18Amendment No.  1 to Energous Corporation 2015 Performance Unit Share Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on May 22, 2015)*
10.19Energous Corporation Director Compensation Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on August 13, 2015)
10.20Brian Sereda Offer Letter (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on July 14, 2015)*
10.21Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy, dated December  17, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed on March 15, 2016)
10.22Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and Ascend Legend Master Fund, Ltd., dated August 9, 2016+(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed on March 16, 2017)
10.23Amendment No. 1 to Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and Ascend Legend Master Fund, Ltd., dated August  12, 2016**(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed on March 16, 2017)
10.24Strategic Alliance Agreement between the Company and Dialog Semiconductor (UK) Ltd., dated November 6, 2016**(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed on March 16, 2017)


Index to Financial Statements

Exhibit

No.

Description of Document

10.25Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and Dialog Semiconductor (UK) Ltd., dated November  6, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed on March 16, 2017)
10.26Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and Dialog Semiconductor (UK) Ltd., dated June  28, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on August 9, 2017)
10.27Amended and Restated Warrant to Purchase Common Stock between the Company and Emily T Fairbairn Roth IRA, dated October 6, 2017+
10.28Amended and Restated Warrant to Purchase Common Stock between the Company and Malcom P Fairbairn Roth IRA, dated October 6, 2017+
10.29Energous Corporation 2017 Equity Inducement Plan*+
10.30Offer Letter effective as of October 9, 2014 between Energous Corporation and Neeraj Sahejpal+
10.31

Form of Severance and Change in Control Agreement*+

10.32Energous Corporation MBO Plan*+
10.33Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy, as amended December 28, 2018+
21.1Subsidiaries of the Exhibit Index).Registrant+
23.1Consent of Marcum LLP+
24.1Power of Attorney (included on signature page)+
31.1Certification Pursuant toRule 13a-14(a) orRule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 +
31.2Certification Pursuant toRule 13a-14(a) orRule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 +
32.1Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002+
101.INSXBRL Instance Document+
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Schema+
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase+
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase+
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase+
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase+

 

31*Indicates a management contract or any compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
+Filed herewith.
**Registrant has omitted portions of the referenced exhibit and submitted such exhibit separately with a request for confidential treatment under Rule24b-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act.


Index to Financial Statements

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Energous Corporation
 

Energous Corporation

Dated: March 30, 201516, 2018

By:

/s/ Stephen R. Rizzone

 

Stephen R. Rizzone

President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director

Dated: March 16, 2018

By:

/s/ Brian Sereda

 
Dated:   March 30, 2015By: /s/ Howard R. Yeaton
 

Howard R. YeatonBrian Sereda

Interim

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY AND SIGNATURES

We,KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned officers and directors of Energous Corporation, a Delaware corporation, do hereby severally constitute and appoint Stephen R. Rizzone our true and Brian Sereda, or each of them individually, the lawful attorney,attorneys-in-fact and agents with full power and authority to himdo any and all acts and things and to execute any and all instruments which said attorneys and agents, and any one of them, determine may be necessary or advisable or required to enable said corporation to comply with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and any rules or regulations or requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with this Registration Statement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing power and authority, the powers granted include the power and authority to sign for usthe names of the undersigned officers and in our namesdirectors in the capacities indicated below any amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K,Registration Statement, to any and generallyall amendments, bothpre-effective and post-effective, and supplements to dothis Registration Statement, and to any and all thingsinstruments or documents filed as part of or in our namesconjunction with this Registration Statement or amendments or supplements thereof, and on our behalf in such capacities to enable Exact Sciences Corporation to comply with the provisionseach of the Securities Exchange Actundersigned hereby ratifies and confirms that all said attorneys and agents, or any one of 1934, as amended, and all the requirements of the Securities Exchange Commission.

them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signatures

  

Title

 

Date

/s/ Stephen R. Rizzone

Stephen R. Rizzone

  

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

 March 30, 201516, 2018
Stephen R. Rizzone

/s/ Michael Leabman

Michael Leabman

  Chief Technology Officer and

Director

 March 30, 201516, 2018
Michael Leabman

/s/ John R. Gaulding

John R. Gaulding

  

Director and Chairman

 March 30, 201516, 2018
John R. Gaulding

/s/ Martin Cooper

Martin Cooper

  
/s/ Nicolaos Alexopoulos

Director

 March 30, 201516, 2018
Nicolaos Alexopoulos

/s/ Robert J. Griffin

Robert J. Griffin

  

Director

 March 30, 201516, 2018
Robert J. Griffin

/s/ Rex S. Jackson

Rex S. Jackson

  

Director

 March 30, 2015
Rex S. Jackson

16, 2018

Exhibit Index to Annual Report on Form 10-K

Exhibit
No.
Description of Document
3.1Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Energous Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-193522) filed on March 13, 2014)
3.2Amendment No. 1 to the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Energous Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2014)
3.3Amended and Restated Bylaws of Energous Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-193522) filed on March 13, 2014)
4.1Specimen Certificate representing shares of common stock of Energous Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-193522) filed on March 21, 2014)
4.2Amended and Restated Warrant issued to MDB Capital Group, LLC (ARW-1) dated December 13, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)
4.3Amended and Restated Warrant issued to MDB Capital Group, LLC (ARW-2) dated December 13, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)
4.4Form of Underwriter’s Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-193522) filed on March 21, 2014)
4.5Voting Agreement between the Company and Hanbit Electronics Co. Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-193522) filed on March 13, 2014)
4.6Form of Amendment to Warrant to Purchase Common Stock Dated June 25, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 13, 2014
10.1 Form of Securities Purchase Agreement between the registrant and investors for an offering completed on May 16, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)
10.2 Form of Registration Rights Agreement between the registrant and investors for an offering completed on May 16, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)
10.3 Form of Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note issued by the registrant to investors in the offering completed on May 16, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)
10.4 Form of Security Agreement between the registrant and investors for the offering completed on May 16, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)
10.5 Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Stephen R. Rizzone dated October 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)*
10.6 Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Michael Leabman dated October 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)*
10.7Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)

10.8Registration Rights Agreement between the registrant and MDB Capital Group, LLC dated May 16, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)
10.9Energous Corporation 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)*
10.10Form of stock option award under 2013 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)*
10.11Standard Industrial/Commercial Multi-Tenant Lease between the registrant and ProSoft Engineering, Inc. dated October 4, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-193522) filed on January 24, 2014)
10.12Form of Non-Statutory Option Award (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-193522) filed on March 13, 2014)*
10.13First Amendment to Energous Corporation 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-193522) filed on March 13, 2014)*
10.142014 Non-Employee Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-193522) filed on March 13, 2014)*
10.15Form of stock option award under 2014 Non-Employee Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-193522) filed on March 21, 2014)*
10.16Offer Letter effective as of July 14, 2014 between Energous Corporation and Cesar Johnston (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 10, 2014)*
10.17 Consulting Agreement effective as of July 14, 2014 between Energous Corporation and Howard Yeaton (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 10, 2014)*
10.18 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement effective as of August 14, 2014 between Energous Corporation and Cesar Johnston (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 10, 2014)*
10.19 Director Compensation Policy dated August 14, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 10, 2014)*
10.20 Lease Agreement dated as of September 10, 2014 between the Company and Balzer Family Investments, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2014)
10.21Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2013 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan* +
10.22Form of Inducement Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement*+
21.1Subsidiaries of the Registrant+
23.1Consent of Marcum LLP+
24.1Power of Attorney (included on signature page)+
31.1Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934+
31.2Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934+
32.1Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002+

101.INS XBRL Instance Document+
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Schema+
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase+
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase+
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase+
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase+

*Indicates a management contract or any compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

+Filed herewith.