UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K

 

(Mark one)  
   
þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152018
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the transition period for          to

 

Commission file number 1-11588

 

SAGA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware 38-3042953
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
   
73 Kercheval Avenue 
Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan 48236
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(313) 886-7070

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value NYSE MKTNASDAQ

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes ¨     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes ¨     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ     No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K.  ¨þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer
¨
Accelerated
filer 
þ
Non-accelerated filer
¨
Smaller reportingReporting
Company ¨
  Emerging growth company
¨

(Do

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not check if a smaller reporting company)to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes ¨     No þ

 

Aggregate market value of the Class A Common Stock and the Class B Common Stock (assuming conversion thereof into Class A Common Stock) held by nonaffiliates of the registrant, computed on the basis of the closing price of the Class A Common Stock on June 30, 20152018 on the NYSE MKT: $187,331,876.American: $191,974,321.

 

The number of shares of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value, and Class B Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding as of March 3, 20164, 2019 was 4,996,1275,025,256 and 864,856,922,918, respectively.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year) are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.

 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

20152018 Form 10-K Annual Report

 

Table of Contents

 

  Page
   
PART I
Item 1.Business4
Item 1A.Risk Factors21
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments26
Item 2.Properties26
Item 3.Legal Proceedings26
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures26
 
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities2627
Item 6.Selected Financial Data30
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations31
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk4645
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data4645
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure4645
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures4645
Item 9B.Other Information4947
 
PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance4947
Item 11.Executive Compensation4947
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters4947
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence4947
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services4947
 
PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules5048
Signatures 87

 

 2 

 

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

Statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In addition, words such as “believes,” “expects”, “anticipates,” “estimates,” “plans,” “expects,“guidance,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are made as of the date of this report or as otherwise indicated, based on current expectations. We undertake no obligation to update this information. A number of important factors could cause our actual results for 20162019 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on our behalf. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance as they involve a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may prove to be incorrect and that may cause our actual results and experiences to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may affect our performance, which are described in Item 1A of this report, include our financial leverage and debt service requirements, dependence on key personnel, dependence on key stations, global, U.S. and local economic conditions, our ability to successfully integrate acquired stations, regulatory requirements, new technologies, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, information technology and terrorist attacks.cybersecurity failures and data security breaches. We cannot be sure that we will be able to anticipate or respond timely to changes in any of these factors, which could adversely affect the operating results in one or more fiscal quarters. Results of operations in any past period should not be considered, in and of itself, indicative of the results to be expected for future periods. Fluctuations in operating results may also result in fluctuations in the price of our stock.

 

 3 

 

 

PART I

 

Item 1.   Business

 

We are a broadcast company primarily engaged in acquiring, developing and operating broadcast properties. On September 1, 2017 we sold our Joplin, Missouri and Victoria, Texas television stations. The television stations that were sold constituted our entire television segment. The historical results of operations for the television stations are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented (see Note 4). As a result of the sale of our television stations and those stations being reported as discontinued operations we only have one reportable segment at December 31, 2018 and 2017. Unless indicated otherwise, the information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements relates to our continuing operations. As of February 29, 2016,28, 2019, we owned and/or operated four television stations and five low-power television stations serving two markets, and sixty-sevenseventy-nine FM and thirty-twothirty-four AM radio stations serving twenty-fourtwenty-seven markets, including Bellingham, Washington; Columbus, Ohio; Norfolk, Virginia; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Manchester, New Hampshire; and Des Moines, Iowa; and Joplin, Missouri.Iowa.

 

The following table sets forth information about our radio stations and the markets they serve as of February 29, 2016:28, 2019:

 

   2015 2015       2018 2018      
   Market Market       Market Market      
   Ranking Ranking       Ranking Ranking      
   By Radio By Radio   Target   By Radio By Radio    Target 
Station Market (a) Revenue (b) Market (b) Station Format Demographics Market (a) Revenue (b)  Market (b)  Station Format Demographics 
                     
FM:               
WKLH Milwaukee, WI 28 40 Classic Rock Men 40-64 Milwaukee, WI  30   41  Classic Rock  Men 40-64 
WHQG Milwaukee, WI 28 40 Rock Men 25-49 Milwaukee, WI  30   41  Rock  Men 18-49 
WJMR-FM Milwaukee, WI 28 40 Urban Adult Contemporary Women 25-54
WJMR-HD2 Milwaukee, WI 28 40 Religious 12+
WNRG-FM Milwaukee, WI 28 40 Contemporary Hits Adults 18-34
WJMR Milwaukee, WI  30   41  Urban Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 
WNRG Milwaukee, WI  30   41  Contemporary Hits  Adults 18-34 
WSNY Columbus, OH 33 37 Adult Contemporary Women 25-54 Columbus, OH  34   36  Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 
WNND Columbus, OH 33 37 Adult Hits Adults 35-54 Columbus, OH  34   36  Classic Hits  Adults 35-64 
WNNP Columbus, OH 33 37 Adult Hits Adults 35-54 Columbus, OH  34   36  Classic Hits  Adults 35-64 
WLVQ (c) Columbus, OH 33 37 Classic Rock Men 40-64
WLVQ Columbus, OH  34   36  Classic Rock  Men 40-64 
WVMX Columbus, OH 33 37 Hot Adult Contemporary Women 25-44 Columbus, OH  34   36  Hot Adult Contemporary  Women 25-44 
WNOR Norfolk, VA 40 43 Rock Men 18-49 Norfolk, VA  40   45  Rock  Men 18-49 
WAFX Norfolk, VA 40 43 Classic Rock Men 35-54 Norfolk, VA  40   45  Classic Rock  Men 35-64 
KSTZ Des Moines, IA 71 72 Hot Adult Contemporary Women 25-44 Des Moines, IA  67   70  Hot Adult Contemporary  Women 25-44 
KSTZ-HD Des Moines, IA 71 72 Country Legends Adults 45-64
KSTZ-HD2 Des Moines, IA  67   70  Country Legends  Adults 45-64 
KIOA Des Moines, IA 71 72 Classic Hits/Oldies Adults 45-64 Des Moines, IA  67   70  Classic Hits  Adults 45-64 
KIOA-HD2 Des Moines, IA  67   70  Contemporary Hits  Adults 18-34 
KAZR Des Moines, IA 71 72 Rock Men 18-34 Des Moines, IA  67   70  Rock  Men 25-49 
KAZR-HD2 Des Moines, IA 71 72 Adult Standards Adults 45+ Des Moines, IA  67   70  Oldies  Adults 45+ 
KMYR Des Moines, IA 71 72 Adult Contemporary Women 25-54 Des Moines, IA  67   70  Soft Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 
KIOA-HD2 Des Moines, IA 71 72 Contemporary Hits Adults 18-34
WMGX Portland, ME 79 91 Hot Adult Contemporary Women 25-44 Portland, ME  72   97  Hot Adult Contemporary  Women 25-44 
WMGX-HD2 Portland, ME 79 91 News Adults 35-64
WYNZ Portland, ME 79 91 Classic Hits/Oldies Adults 45-64 Portland, ME  72   97  Classic Hits  Adults 45-64 
WPOR Portland, ME 79 91 Country Adults 25-54 Portland, ME  72   97  Contemporary Country  Adults 25-54 
WCLZ Portland, ME 79 91 Adult Album Alternative Adults 25-54 Portland, ME  72   97  Adult Album Alternative  Adults 25-54 
WAVF Charleston, SC  86   78  Adult Contemporary  Adults 25-54 
WCKN Charleston, SC  86   78  Contemporary Country  Adults 25-54 
WMXZ Charleston, SC  86   78  Hot Adult Contemporary  Women 25-44 
WMXZ-HD2 Charleston, SC  86   78  Urban Hits  Adults 18-34 
WXST Charleston, SC  86   78  Urban Adult Contemporary  Adults 25-54 
WAQY Springfield, MA 103 92 Classic Rock Men 35-54 Springfield, MA  97   100  Classic Rock  Men 35-54 
WLZX Springfield, MA 103 92 Rock Men 18-34 Springfield, MA  97   100  Alternative Rock  Men 18-49 
WZID Manchester, NH 120 200 Adult Contemporary Women 25-54
WMLL Manchester, NH 120 200 Classic Hits Adults 40-64
WZID-HD2 Manchester, NH 120 200 Contemporary Hits Adults 18-34
WOXL-FM Asheville, NC 160 159 Adult Contemporary Women 25-54
WTMT Asheville, NC 160 159 Classic Rock Men 40+
WTMT-HD2 Asheville, NC 160 159 Country Legends Adults 45-64
WOXL-HD2 Asheville, NC 160 159 Adult Album Alternative Adults 18-49
WSIG Harrisonburg, VA 163 255 Classic Country Adults 40-64
WQPO Harrisonburg, VA 163 255 Contemporary Hits Women 18-34
WQPO-HD3 Harrisonburg, VA 163 255 Classic Rock Male 40-64
WMQR Harrisonburg, VA 163 255 Adult Contemporary Female 25-44
WWRE Harrisonburg, VA 163 255 Classic Hits Adults 45+
WLRW Champaign, IL 168 210 Hot Adult Contemporary Women 25-44
WREE Champaign, IL 168 210 Adult Hits Adults 35-44
WYXY Champaign, IL 168 210 Classic Country Adults 45-64
WOGK Ocala-Gainesville, FL  118   87  Contemporary Country  Adults 25-54 
WYND Ocala-Gainesville, FL  118   87  Classic Rock  Men 40-64 
WNDD Ocala-Gainesville, FL  118   87  Classic Rock  Men 40-64 
WNDN Ocala-Gainesville, FL  118   87  Classic Rock  Men 40-64 

(footnotes follow tables)

 

 4 

 

 

    2015 2015    
    Market Market    
    Ranking Ranking    
    By Radio By Radio   Target
Station Market (a) Revenue (b) Market (b) Station Format Demographics
           
WIXY-HD2 Champaign, IL 168 210 Rock Men 18-49
WIXY-HD3 Champaign, IL 168 210 Contemporary Hits Adults 18-34
WLRW-HD2 Champaign, IL 168 210 Oldies/Classic Hits Adults 45-64
WNAX-FM Yankton, SD 192 262 Country Adults 35+
WWWV Charlottesville, VA 219 206 Classic Rock Men 35+
WQMZ Charlottesville, VA 219 206 Adult Contemporary Women 25-54
WCNR Charlottesville, VA 219 206 Adult Album Alternative Adults 18-49
KEGI Jonesboro, AR 225 227 Classic Hits Men 25-54
KDXY Jonesboro, AR 225 227 Country Adults 25-54
KJBX Jonesboro, AR 225 227 Adult Contemporary Women 25-54
KJBX-HD2 Jonesboro, AR 225 227 Country Legends Adults 45-64
KDXY-HD2 Jonesboro, AR 225 227 Contemporary Hits Adults 18-34
KDXY-HD3 Jonesboro, AR 225 227 Sports ESPN Men 35+
KISM Bellingham, WA N/A N/A Classic Rock Men 25-54
KAFE Bellingham, WA N/A N/A Adult Contemporary Women 25-54
WKVT-FM Brattleboro, VT N/A N/A Classic Hits Adults 25-54
WRSY Brattleboro, VT N/A N/A Adult Album Alternative Adults 25-54
WQEL Bucyrus, OH N/A N/A Classic Hits Adults 25-54
WCVQ Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY N/A N/A Hot Adult Contemporary Women 25-54
WVVR Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY N/A N/A Country Adults 25-54
WZZP Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY N/A N/A Rock Men 18-34
WRND-FM Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY N/A N/A Classic Hits Adults 35-54
WHAI Greenfield, MA N/A N/A Adult Contemporary Women 25-54
WPVQ Greenfield, MA N/A N/A Country Adults 25-54
WIII Ithaca, NY N/A N/A Classic Rock Men 35-64
WQNY Ithaca, NY N/A N/A Country Adults 25-54
WYXL Ithaca, NY N/A N/A Adult Contemporary Women 25-54
WYXL-HD2 Ithaca, NY N/A N/A Adult Album Alternative Adults 35-54
WYXL-HD3 Ithaca, NY N/A N/A Sports Men 25-54
WQNY-HD2 Ithaca, NY N/A N/A Progressive Talk Adults 35+
WQNY-HD3 Ithaca, NY N/A N/A News Talk Adults 35+
WFIZ-FM Ithaca, NY N/A N/A Contemporary Hits Adults 18-34
WFIZ-HD2 Ithaca, NY N/A N/A Classic Hits/Oldies Adults 35+
WKNE Keene, NH N/A N/A Hot Adult Contemporary Women 25-54
WSNI Keene, NH N/A N/A Adult Contemporary Women 35-54
WINQ Keene, NH N/A N/A Country Adults 25-54
WKNE-HD2 Keene, NH N/A N/A Adult Album Alternative Adult 18-49
WKNE-HD3 Keene, NH N/A N/A Classic Hits/Oldies Adults 45-64
KMIT Mitchell, SD N/A N/A Country Adults 35+
KMIT-HD2 Mitchell, SD N/A N/A Adult Contemporary Women 25-54
KUQL Mitchell, SD N/A N/A Classic Hits/Oldies Adults 45-64
WRSI Northampton, MA N/A N/A Adult Album Alternative Adults 25-54
WLZX-HD2 Northampton, MA N/A N/A Contemporary Hits Adults 18-34
KICD-FM Spencer, IA N/A N/A Country Adults 35+
KMRR Spencer, IA N/A N/A Adult Contemporary Women 25-54
WYMG Springfield, IL N/A N/A Classic Rock Men 25-54
WQQL Springfield, IL N/A N/A Classic Hits/Oldies Adults 45-64
WDBR Springfield, IL N/A N/A Contemporary Hits Adults 18-34
WLFZ Springfield, IL N/A N/A Country Adults 25-54
WDBR-HD2 Springfield, IL N/A N/A Country Legends Adults 45-64
    2018  2018      
    Market  Market      
    Ranking  Ranking      
    By Radio  By Radio    Target 
Station Market (a) Revenue (b)  Market (b)  Station Format Demographics 
              
WZID Manchester, NH  133   201  Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 
WMLL Manchester, NH  133   201  Classic Hits  Adults 45-64 
WZID-HD2 Manchester, NH  133   201  Contemporary Hits  Adults 18-34 
WZID-HD3 Manchester, NH  133   201  Classic Country  Adults 45-64 
WOXL Asheville, NC  153   157  Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 
WTMT Asheville, NC  153   157  Classic Rock  Men 40-64 
WTMT-HD2 Asheville, NC  153   157  Classic Hits  Adults 45-64 
WTMT-HD3 Asheville, NC  153   157  Country Legends  Adults 45-64 
WOXL-HD2 Asheville, NC  153   157  Adult Album Alternative  Adults 25-54 
WOXL-HD3 Asheville, NC  153   157  Oldies  Adults 45+ 
WSIG Harrisonburg, VA  168   253  Classic Country  Adults 35-64 
WQPO Harrisonburg, VA  168   253  Contemporary Hits  Women 18-34 
WQPO-HD2 Harrisonburg, VA  168   253  Oldies  Adults 45+ 
WQPD-HD3 Harrisonburg, VA  168   253  Classic Rock  Male 40-64 
WMQR Harrisonburg, VA  168   253  Adult Contemporary  Female 25-44 
WWRE Harrisonburg, VA  168   253  Classic Hits  Adults 45-64 
WNAX Yankton, SD  182   260  Contemporary Country  Adults 25-54 
WNAX-HD2 Yankton, SD  182   260  Country Legends  Adults 45-64 
WWWV Charlottesville, VA  191   209  Classic Rock  Men 40-64 
WQMZ Charlottesville, VA  191   209  Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 
WCNR Charlottesville, VA  191   209  Adult Album Alternative  Adults 25-54 
WCVL Charlottesville, VA  191   209  Contemporary Country  Adults 25-54 
WLHH Hilton Head, SC  248   224  Classic Hits  Adults 45-64 
WOEZ Hilton Head, SC  248   224  Adult Contemporary  Women 35-64 
WVSC Hilton Head, SC  248   224  Soft Adult Contemporary  Women 35-64 
WVSC-HD2 Hilton Head, SC  248   224  Oldies/Classic Hits  Adults 45-64 
KISM Bellingham, WA  N/A   N/A  Classic Rock  Men 40-64 
KAFE Bellingham, WA  N/A   N/A  Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 
WKVT Brattleboro, VT  N/A   N/A  Classic Hits  Adults 40-64 
WRSY Brattleboro, VT  N/A   N/A  Adult Album Alternative  Adults 25-54 
WQEL Bucyrus, OH  N/A   N/A  Classic Hits  Adults 40-64 
WLRW Champaign, IL  N/A   N/A  Hot Adult Contemporary  Women 25-44 
WREE Champaign, IL  N/A   N/A  Classic Hits  Adults 40-64 
WYXY Champaign, IL  N/A   N/A  Classic Country  Adults 45-64 
WIXY Champaign, IL  N/A   N/A  Country  Adults 25-54 
WIXY-HD2 Champaign, IL  N/A   N/A  Rock  Men 18-49 
WIXY-HD3 Champaign, IL  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Hits  Adults 18-34 
WLRW-HD2 Champaign, IL  N/A   N/A  Oldies/Classic Hits  Adults 45-64 
WCVQ Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY  N/A   N/A  Hot Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 
WVVR Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Country  Adults 25-54 
WZZP Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY  N/A   N/A  Rock  Men 18-49 
WRND Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY  N/A   N/A  Classic Hits  Adults 40-64 
WCVQ-HD2 Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Christian  Adults 25-54 
WCVQ-HD3 Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY  N/A   N/A  Country Legends  Adults 45-64 
WHAI Greenfield, MA  N/A   N/A  Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 

(footnotes follow tables)

 

 5 

 

 

    2015 2015     
    Market Market     
    Ranking Ranking     
    By Radio By Radio   Target 
Station Market (a) Revenue (b) Market (b) Station Format Demographics 
            
AM:           
WJYI Milwaukee, WI 28 40 Christian Adults 18+ 
WJOI Norfolk, VA 40 43 Adult Standards Adults 45+ 
KRNT Des Moines, IA 71 72 Adult Standards/Sports Adults 45+ 
KPSZ Des Moines, IA 71 72 Christian Adults 18+ 
WGAN Portland, ME 79 91 News/Talk Adults 35+ 
WZAN Portland, ME 79 91 News/Talk/Sports Men 25-54 
WBAE Portland, ME 79 91 News/Talk/Sports Adults 35+ 
WGIN Portland, ME 79 91 News/Talk/Sports Adults 35+ 
WHNP Springfield, MA 103 92 News/Talk Adults 35+ 
WFEA Manchester, NH 120 200 News/Talk Adults 35+ 
WISE Asheville, NC 160 159 Sports/Talk Men 18+ 
WYSE Asheville, NC 160 159 Sports/Talk Men 18+ 
WSVA Harrisonburg, VA 163 255 News/Talk Adults 35+ 
WHBG Harrisonburg, VA 163 255 Sports ESPN Men 25+ 
WNAX Yankton, SD 192 262 News/Talk Adults 35+ 
WINA Charlottesville, VA 219 206 News/Talk Adults 35+ 
WVAX Charlottesville, VA 219 206 Sports Talk Men 18+ 
KGMI Bellingham, WA N/A N/A News/Talk Adults 35+ 
KPUG Bellingham, WA N/A N/A Sports/Talk Men 18+ 
KBAI Bellingham, WA N/A N/A Progressive Talk Adults 35+ 
WKVT Brattleboro, VT N/A N/A News/Talk Adults 35+ 
WBCO Bucyrus, OH N/A N/A Adult Standards Adults 45+ 
WRND Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY N/A N/A Classic Hits Adults 35-54 
WKFN Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY N/A N/A Sports/Talk ESPN Men 25+ 
WHMQ Greenfield, MA N/A N/A News/Talk Adults 35+ 
WNYY Ithaca, NY N/A N/A Progressive Talk Adults 35+ 
WHCU Ithaca, NY N/A N/A News/Talk Adults 35+ 
WKBK Keene, NH N/A N/A News/Talk Adults 35+ 
WZBK Keene, NH N/A N/A Sports Talk Men 18+ 
WHMP Northampton, MA N/A N/A News/Talk Adults 35+ 
KICD Spencer, IA N/A N/A News/Talk Adults 35+ 
WTAX Springfield, IL N/A N/A News/Talk Adults 35+ 

       2018   2018       
       Market   Market       
       Ranking   Ranking       
       By Radio   By Radio     Target 
Station   Market (a)  Revenue (b)   Market (b)  Station Format  Demographics 
                   
WPVQ   Greenfield, MA  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Country  Adults 25-54 
WIII   Ithaca, NY  N/A   N/A  Iconic Rock  Men 40-64 
WQNY   Ithaca, NY  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Country  Adults 25-54 
WQNY-HD3   Ithaca, NY  N/A   N/A  Alternative  Men 18-34 
WYXL   Ithaca, NY  N/A   N/A  Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 
WYXL-HD2   Ithaca, NY  N/A   N/A  Adult Album Alternative  Adults 25-54 
WYXL-HD3   Ithaca, NY  N/A   N/A  Sports  Men 25-64 
WFIZ   Ithaca, NY  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Hits  Adults 18-34 
WFIZ-HD2   Ithaca, NY  N/A   N/A  Oldies/Classic Hits  Adults 40-64 
KEGI   Jonesboro, AR  N/A   N/A  Classic Rock  Men 40-64 
KDXY   Jonesboro, AR  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Country  Adults 25-54 
KJBX   Jonesboro, AR  N/A   N/A  Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 
KJBX-HD2   Jonesboro, AR  N/A   N/A  Country Legends  Adults 45-64 
KDXY-HD2   Jonesboro, AR  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Hits  Adults 18-34 
KDXY-HD3   Jonesboro, AR  N/A   N/A  Sports ESPN  Men 35-64 
WKNE   Keene, NH  N/A   N/A  Hot Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 
WKNE-HD2   Keene, NH  N/A   N/A  Adult Album Alternative  Adults 25-54 
WKNE-HD3   Keene, NH  N/A   N/A  Classic Country  Adults 45-64 
WSNI   Keene, NH  N/A   N/A  Adult Contemporary  Women 25-44 
WSNI-HD2   Keene, NH  N/A   N/A  Adult Album Alternative  Adults 25-54 
WINQ   Keene, NH  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Country  Adults 25-54 
WINQ-HD2   Keene, NH  N/A   N/A  Classic Country  Adults 45-64 
KMIT   Mitchell, SD  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Country  Adults 25-54 
KMIT-HD2   Mitchell, SD  N/A   N/A  Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 
KMIT-HD3   Mitchell, SD  N/A   N/A  Sports  Men 18-64 
KUQL   Mitchell, SD  N/A   N/A  Classic Hits/Oldies  Adults 45-64 
WRSI   Northampton, MA  N/A   N/A  Adult Album Alternative  Adults 25-54 
WLZX-HD2   Northampton, MA  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Hits  Adults 18-34 
WLZX-HD3   Northampton, MA  N/A   N/A  Oldies  Adults 45+ 
KICD   Spencer, IA  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Country  Adults 25-54 
KMRR   Spencer, IA  N/A   N/A  Adult Contemporary  Women 25-54 
KMRR-HD2   Spencer, IA  N/A   N/A  Oldies  Adults 45+ 
KMRR-HD3   Spencer, IA  N/A   N/A  Soft Adult Contemporary  Female 35-64 
WYMG   Springfield, IL  N/A   N/A  Classic Rock  Men 25-54 
WDBR   Springfield, IL  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Hits  Adults 18-34 
WQQL   Springfield, IL  N/A   N/A  Classic Hits/Oldies  Adults 45-64 
WLFZ   Springfield, IL  N/A   N/A  Contemporary Country  Adults 25-54 
WDBR-HD2   Springfield, IL  N/A   N/A  Country Legends  Adults 45-64 
WDBR-HD3   Springfield, IL  N/A   N/A  Oldies  Adults 45+ 

(footnotes follow tables)

 

 6

     2018  2018      
     Market  Market      
     Ranking  Ranking      
     By Radio  By Radio     Target
Station Market (a)  Revenue (b)  Market (b)  Station Format  Demographics
               
AM:                
WJYI Milwaukee, WI  30   41   Christian  Adults 25-54
WJOI Norfolk, VA  40   45   Adult Standards  Adults 45-64
KRNT Des Moines, IA  67   70   Sports  Men 18-64
KPSZ Des Moines, IA  67   70   Christian  Adults 25-54
WGAN Portland, ME  72   97   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
WZAN Portland, ME  72   97   Talk/Sports  Men 18-64
WBAE Portland, ME  72   97   Soft Adult Contemporary  Female 35-64
WGIN Portland, ME  72   97   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
WSPO Charleston, SC  86   78   Gospel  Adults 25-54
WHNP Springfield, MA  97   100   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
WFEA Manchester, NH  133   201   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
WISE Asheville, NC  153   157   Sports/Talk  Men 18-64
WYSE Asheville, NC  153   157   Sports/Talk  Men 18-64
WSVA Harrisonburg, VA  168   253   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
WHBG Harrisonburg, VA  168   253   Sports ESPN  Men 18-64
WNAX Yankton, SD  180   260   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
WINA Charlottesville, VA  191   209   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
WVAX Charlottesville, VA  191   209   Sports Talk  Men 18-64
KGMI Bellingham, WA  N/A   N/A   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
KPUG Bellingham, WA  N/A   N/A   Sports/Talk  Men 18-64
KBAI Bellingham, WA  N/A   N/A   Classic Hits  Adults 40-64
WKVT Brattleboro, VT  N/A   N/A   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
WBCO Bucyrus, OH  N/A   N/A   Country Legends  Adults 45-64
WRND Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY  N/A   N/A   Classic Hits  Adults 40-64
WKFN Clarksville, TN — Hopkinsville, KY  N/A   N/A   Sports/Talk ESPN  Men 18-64
WHMQ Greenfield, MA  N/A   N/A   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
WPVQ Greenfield, MA  N/A   N/A   Classic Country  Adults 45+
WNYY Ithaca, NY  N/A   N/A   Oldies  Adults 45+
WHCU Ithaca, NY  N/A   N/A   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
WKBK Keene, NH  N/A   N/A   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
WZBK Keene, NH  N/A   N/A   Sports Talk  Men 18-64
WHMP Northampton, MA  N/A   N/A   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
KICD Spencer, IA  N/A   N/A   News/Talk  Adults 35-64
WTAX Springfield, IL  N/A   N/A   News/Talk  Adults 35-64

(footnotes follow tables)

(a)Actual city of license may differ from metropolitan market actually served.
  
(b)Derived from Investing in Radio 20152018 Market Report.
(c)Station operated under the terms of a Local Marketing Agreement (“LMA”) effective November 16, 2015.

 

 67 

 

The following table sets forth information about the television stations that we own or operate and the markets they serve as of February 29, 2016:

    2015 Market    
    Ranking by   Fall 2015
    Number of TV Station Station Ranking
Station Market (a) Households (b) Affiliate (by # of viewers) (b)
         
KOAM-TV Joplin, MO — Pittsburg, KS 151 CBS 1
KFJX(d) Joplin, MO — Pittsburg, KS 151 FOX 3
KAVU-TV Victoria, TX 203 ABC N/S
KVCT(c) Victoria, TX 203 FOX N/S
KMOL-LD Victoria, TX 203 NBC N/S
KXTS-LD Victoria, TX 203 CBS N/S
KUNU-LD Victoria, TX 203 Univision N/S
KVTX-LP Victoria, TX 203 Telemundo N/S
KQZY-LP Victoria, TX 203 Cozi TV N/S

(a)Actual city of license may differ from metropolitan market actually served.

(b)Derived from Fall 2015 A.C. Nielsen ratings and data.

(c)Station operated under the terms of a Time Brokerage Agreement (“TBA”).

(d)Station operated under the terms of a Shared Services Agreement.

N/SStation is a non-subscriber to the A.C. Nielsen ratings and data.

For purposes of business segment reporting, we have aligned operations with similar characteristics into two business segments: Radio and Television. The Radio segment includes twenty-four markets, which includes all ninety-nine of our radio stations. The Television segment includes two markets and consists of four television stations and five low power television (“LPTV”) stations. For more information regarding our reportable segments, see Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included with this Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Strategy

 

Our strategy is to operate top billing radio and television stations in mid-sized markets, which we define as markets ranked from 20 to 200 out of the markets summarized by Investing in Radio Market Report and Investing in Television Market Report.

 

Programming and marketing are key components in our strategy to achieve top ratings in both our radio and television operations. In many of our markets, the three or four most highly rated radio stations (radio and/or television) receive a disproportionately high share of the market’s advertising revenues. As a result, a station’s revenue is dependent upon its ability to maximize its number of listeners/viewers within an advertiser’s given demographic parameters. In certain cases we use attributes other than specific market listener data for sales activities. In those markets where sufficient alternative data is available, we do not subscribe to an independent listener rating service.

 

The radio stations that we own and/or operate employ a variety of programming formats, including Classic Hits, Adult Hits, Top 40, Country, Country Legends, Mainstream/Hot/Soft Adult Contemporary, Pure Oldies, Classic Rock, News/Talk and Country.News/Talk. We regularly perform extensive market research, including music evaluations, focus groups and strategic vulnerability studies. Our stations also employ audience promotions to further develop and secure a loyal following.

 

The television stations that we ownowned and/or operate areoperated, prior to their sale, during 2017 were comprised of two CBS affiliates, one ABC affiliate, two Fox affiliates, one Univision affiliate, one NBC affiliate, one Telemundo affiliate and one Cozi TV affiliate. In addition to securing network programming, we carefully selectselected available syndicated programming to maximize viewership. We also developdeveloped local programming, including a strong local news franchise in each of our television markets.

7

  

We concentrate on the development of strong decentralized local management, which is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the stations we own and/or operate. We compensate local management based on the station’s financial performance, as well as other performance factors that are deemed to affect the long-term ability of the stations to achieve financial performance objectives. Corporate management is responsible for long-range planning, establishing policies and procedures, resource allocation and monitoring the activities of the stations.

 

Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the “Telecommunications Act”), we are permitted to own as many as 8eight radio stations in a single market. See “Federal Regulation of Radio and Television Broadcasting”. We seek to acquire reasonably priced broadcast properties with significant growth potential that are located in markets with well-established and relatively stable economies. We often focus on local economies supported by a strong presence of state or federal government or one or more major universities. Future acquisitions will be subject to the availability of financing, the terms of our credit facility, and compliance with the Communications Act of 1934 (the “Communications Act”) and Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) rules.  

 

Advertising Sales  

 

Our primary source of revenue is from the sale of advertising for broadcast on our stations. Depending on the format of a particular radio station, there are a predetermined number of advertisements broadcast each hour. The number of advertisements broadcast on our television stations may bewere limited by certain network affiliation and syndication agreements and, with respect to children’s programs, federal regulation. We determine the number of advertisements broadcast hourly that can maximize a station’s available revenue dollars without jeopardizing listening/viewing levels. While there may be shifts from time to time in the number of advertisements broadcast during a particular time of the day, the total number of advertisements broadcast on a particular station generally does not vary significantly from year to year. Any change in our revenue, with the exception of those instances where stations are acquired or sold, is generally the result of pricing adjustments, which are made to ensure that the station efficiently utilizes available inventory.

 

Advertising rates charged by radio and television stations are based primarily on a station’s ability to attract audiences in the demographic groups targeted by advertisers, the number of stations in the market competing for the same demographic group, the supply of and demand for radio and television advertising time, and other qualitative factors including rates charged by competing radio and television stations within a given market. Radio rates are generally highest during morning and afternoon drive-time hours, while television advertising rates are generally higher during prime time evening viewing periods. Most advertising contracts are short-term, generally running for only a few weeks. This allows broadcasters the ability to modify advertising rates as dictated by changes in station ownership within a market, changes in listener/viewer ratings and changes in the business climate within a particular market.

 

8

Approximately $127,449,000$116,386,000 or 89%87% of our gross revenue for the year ended December 31, 20152018 (approximately $127,214,000$124,809,000 or 87% in fiscal 20142017 and approximately $122,400,000$131,233,000 or 87%85% in fiscal 2013)2016) was generated from the sale of local advertising.advertising for both continuing operations and discontinued operations. Additional revenue is generated from the sale of national advertising, network compensation payments, barter and other miscellaneous transactions. In all of our markets, we attempt to maintain a local sales force that is generally larger than our competitors. The principal goal in our sales efforts is to develop long-standing customer relationships through frequent direct contacts, which we believe represents a competitive advantage. We also typically provide incentives to our sales staff to seek out new opportunities resulting in the establishment of new client relationships, as well as new sources of revenue, not directly associated with the sale of broadcast time.

 

Each of our stations also engages independent national sales representatives to assist us in obtaining national advertising revenues. These representatives obtain advertising through national advertising agencies and receive a commission from us based on our net revenue from the advertising obtained. Total gross revenue resulting from national advertising for both continuing operations and discontinued operations in fiscal 20152018 was approximately $16,477,000$18,110,000 or 11%13% of our gross revenue (approximately $19,074,000$18,151,000 or 13% in fiscal 20142017 and approximately $18,904,000$23,545,000 or 13%15% in fiscal 2013)2016 which includes $5,183,000 in national political sales or 3%).

 

8

Competition

 

Both radio and television broadcasting are highly competitive businesses. Our stations compete for listeners/viewers and advertising revenues directly with other radio and/or television stations, as well as other media, within their markets. Our radio andstations (and prior to their sale, our television stationsstations) compete for listeners/viewers primarily on the basis of program content and by employing on-air talent which appeals to a particular demographic group. By building a strong listener/viewer base comprised of a specific demographic group in each of our markets, we are able to attract advertisers seeking to reach these listeners/viewers.

 

Other media, including broadcast television and/or radio (as applicable), cable television, newspapers, magazines, direct mail, the Internet, coupons and billboard advertising, also compete with us for advertising revenues.

 

The radio and television broadcasting industries are also subject to competition from new media technologies, such as the delivery of audio programming by cable and satellite television systems, satellite radio systems, direct reception from satellites, and streaming of audio on the Internet.

 

Seasonality  

 

Our revenue varies throughout the year. Advertising expenditures, our primary source of revenue, is generally lowest in the first quarter.

 

Environmental Compliance  

 

As the owner, lessee or operator of various real properties and facilities, we are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Historically, compliance with these laws and regulations has not had a material adverse effect on our business. There can be no assurance, however, that compliance with existing or new environmental laws and regulations will not require us to make significant expenditures of funds.

 

Employees  

 

As of December 31, 2015,2018, we had approximately 797687 full-time employees and 344 part-time employees, none of whom are represented by unions. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.

 

We employ several high-profile personalities with large loyal audiences in their respective markets. We have entered into employment and non-competition agreements with our President and with most of our on-air personalities, as well as non-competition agreements with our commissioned sales representatives.

 

Available Information  

 

You can find more information about us at our Internet website www.sagacommunications.com. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports are available free of charge on our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

 

9

Federal Regulation of Radio and Television Broadcasting 

 

Introduction.   The ownership, operation and sale of radio and television stations, including those licensed to us, are subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC, which acts under authority granted by the Communications Act. Among other things, the FCC assigns frequency bands for broadcasting; determines the particular frequencies, locations and operating power of stations; issues, renews, revokes and modifies station licenses; determines whether to approve changes in ownership or control of station licenses; regulates equipment used by stations; adopts and implements regulations and policies that directly or indirectly affect the ownership, operation and employment practices of stations; and has the power to impose penalties for violations of its rules or the Communications Act. For additional information on the impact of FCC regulations and the introduction of new technologies on our operations, see “Forward Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” contained elsewhere herein.

 

9

The following is a brief summary of certain provisions of the Communications Act and of specific FCC regulations and policies. Reference should be made to the Communications Act, FCC rules and the public notices and rulings of the FCC for further information concerning the nature and extent of federal regulation of broadcast stations.

 

License Renewal.   Radio and television broadcasting licenses are granted for maximum terms of eight years, and are subject to renewal upon application to the FCC. Under its “two-step” renewal process, the FCC must grant a renewal application if it finds that during the preceding term the licensee has served the public interest, convenience and necessity, and there have been no serious violations of the Communications Act or the FCC’s rules which, taken together, would constitute a pattern of abuse. If a renewal applicant fails to meet these standards, the FCC may either deny its application or grant the application on such terms and conditions as are appropriate, including renewal for less than the full 8-year term. In making the determination of whether to renew the license, the FCC may not consider whether the public interest would be served by the grant of a license to a person other than the renewal applicant. If the FCC, after notice and opportunity for a hearing, finds that the licensee has failed to meet the requirements for renewal and no mitigating factors justify the imposition of lesser sanctions, the FCC may issue an order denying the renewal application, and only thereafter may the FCC accept applications for a construction permit specifying the broadcasting facilities of the former licensee. Petitions may be filed to deny the renewal applications of our stations, but any such petitions must raise issues that would cause the FCC to deny a renewal application under the standards adopted in the “two-step” renewal process. All the Company’s licenses have been renewed for their regular terms. In the future, we intend to timely file renewal applications, as required for the Company’s stations. Radio station licenses generally expire along with the licenses of all other radio stations in a given state. The FCC accepts renewal applications for various groups of radio stations every two months, beginning in June 2019, when we must file applications for renewal of license of our radio stations in Virginia. In January 2018, the FCC designated the renewal applications of two AM radio stations for hearing based on the stations’ records of extended periods of silence during and following their respective license renewal terms. Under the Communications Act, if a broadcast station fails to transmit signals for any consecutive 12-month period, the FCC license expires at the end of that period, unless the FCC exercises its discretion to extend or reinstate the license “to promote equity and fairness.” The FCC, to date, has rarely exercised such discretion.

10

 

The following table sets forth the market and broadcast power of each of the broadcast stations that we own or operate with an attributable interest and the date on which each such station’s FCC license expires:

 

    Power Expiration Date of
Station Market (1) (Watts) (2) FCC Authorization
       
FM:  
WOXLAsheville, NC25,000December 1, 2019
WTMTAsheville, NC50,000December 1, 2019
KISMBellingham, WA100,000February 1, 2022
KAFEBellingham, WA100,000February 1, 2022
WRSYBrattleboro, VT3,000April 1, 2022
WKVTBrattleboro, VT6,000April 1, 2022
WQELBucyrus, OH3,000October 1, 2020
WLRWChampaign, IL50,000December 1, 2020
WIXYChampaign, IL25,000December 1, 2020
WREEChampaign, IL25,000December 1, 2020
WYXYChampaign, IL50,000December 1, 2020
WWWVCharlottesville, VA50,000October 1, 2019
WQMZCharlottesville, VA6,000October 1, 2019
WCNRCharlottesville, VA6,000October 1, 2019
WCVQClarksville, TN/Hopkinsville, KY100,000August 1, 2020
WZZPClarksville, TN/Hopkinsville, KY6,000August 1, 2020
WVVRClarksville, TN/Hopkinsville, KY100,000August 1, 2020
WRNDClarksville, TN/Hopkinsville, KY6,000August 1, 2020
WSNYColumbus, OH50,000October 1, 2020
WNNPColumbus, OH6,000October 1, 2020
WNNDColumbus, OH6,000October 1, 2020
WVMXColumbus, OH6,000October 1, 2020
WLVQColumbus, OH50,000October 1, 2020
KSTZDes Moines, IA100,000February 1, 2021
KIOADes Moines, IA100,000February 1, 2021
KAZRDes Moines, IA100,000February 1, 2021
KMYRDes Moines, IA100,000February 1, 2021
WHAIGreenfield, MA3,000April 1, 2022
WPVQGreenfield, MA3,000April 1, 2022

(footnotes follow tables)

10

PowerExpiration Date of
StationMarket (1)(Watts) (2)FCC Authorization
       
WMQRWOXL Harrisonburg,Asheville, NC50,000December 1, 2019
WTMTAsheville, NC50,000December 1, 2019
KISMBellingham, WA100,000February 1, 2022
KAFEBellingham, WA100,000February 1, 2022
WRSYBrattleboro, VT3,000April 1, 2022
WKVTBrattleboro, VT6,000April 1, 2022
WQELBucyrus, OH3,000October 1, 2020
WLRWChampaign, IL50,000December 1, 2020
WIXYChampaign, IL25,000December 1, 2020
WREEChampaign, IL25,000December 1, 2020
WYXYChampaign, IL50,000December 1, 2020
WAVFCharleston, SC100,000December 1, 2019
WCKNCharleston, SC100,000December 1, 2019
WMXZCharleston, SC50,000December 1, 2019
WXSTCharleston, SC100,000December 1, 2019
WWWVCharlottesville, VA 25,00050,000 October 1, 2019
WQPOWQMZ Harrisonburg,Charlottesville, VA 50,0006,000 October 1, 2019
WSIGWCNR Harrisonburg,Charlottesville, VA 25,0006,000 October 1, 2019
WWREWCVL Harrisonburg,Charlottesville, VA 6,000 October 1, 2019
WYXLWCVQ Ithaca, NYClarksville, TN/Hopkinsville, KY100,000August 1, 2020
WZZPClarksville, TN/Hopkinsville, KY6,000August 1, 2020
WVVRClarksville, TN/Hopkinsville, KY100,000August 1, 2020
WRNDClarksville, TN/Hopkinsville, KY6,000August 1, 2020
WSNYColumbus, OH 50,000 JuneOctober 1, 2020
WQNYWNNP Ithaca, NYColumbus, OH6,000October 1, 2020
WNNDColumbus, OH6,000October 1, 2020
WVMXColumbus, OH6,000October 1, 2020
WLVQColumbus, OH 50,000 JuneOctober 1, 2020
WIIIKSTZ Ithaca, NYDes Moines, IA 50,000100,000 JuneFebruary 1, 20202021
KEGIKIOA Jonesboro, ARDes Moines, IA 50,000100,000 JuneFebruary 1, 20202021
KDXYKAZR Jonesboro, ARDes Moines, IA 25,000100,000 JuneFebruary 1, 20202021
KJBXKMYR Jonesboro, ARDes Moines, IA 6,000100,000 JuneFebruary 1, 20202021
WKNEWHAI Keene, NHGreenfield, MA 50,0003,000 April 1, 2022
WSNIWPVQ Keene, NHGreenfield, MA 6,0003,000 April 1, 2022
WINQWMQR Keene, NH6,000April 1, 2022
WZIDManchester, NH50,000April 1, 2022
WMLLManchester, NH6,000April 1, 2022
WKLHMilwaukee, WI50,000December 1, 2020
WHQGMilwaukee, WI50,000December 1, 2020
WNRGMilwaukee, WI6,000December 1, 2020
WJMRMilwaukee, WI6,000December 1, 2020
KMITMitchell, SD100,000April 1, 2021
KUQLMitchell, SD100,000April 1, 2021
WNORNorfolk,Harrisonburg, VA 50,00025,000 October 1, 2019
WAFXWQPO Norfolk,Harrisonburg, VA 100,00050,000 October 1, 2019
WRSIWSIG Northampton, MAHarrisonburg, VA 3,00025,000 AprilOctober 1, 20222019
WPORWWRE Portland, MEHarrisonburg, VA6,000October 1, 2019
WOEZHilton Head Island, SC25,000December 1, 2019
WLHHHilton Head Island, SC25,000December 1, 2019
WVSCHilton Head Island, SC25,000December 1, 2019
WYXLIthaca, NY 50,000 AprilJune 1, 2022
WCLZWQNY Portland, MEIthaca, NY 50,000 AprilJune 1, 2022
WMGXWIII Portland, MEIthaca, NY 50,000 AprilJune 1, 2022
WYNZWFIZ Portland, MEIthaca, NY 25,000April 1, 2022
KICDSpencer, IA100,000February 1, 2021
KMRRSpencer, IA25,000February 1, 2021
WLZXSpringfield, MA 6,000 AprilJune 1, 2022
WAQYSpringfield, MA50,000April 1, 2022
WYMGSpringfield, IL50,000December 1, 2020
WLFZSpringfield, IL50,000December 1, 2020
WDBRSpringfield, IL50,000December 1, 2020
WQQLSpringfield, IL25,000December 1, 2020
WNAXYankton, SD100,000April 1, 2021

 

(footnotes follow tables)

 11 

 

 

     Power  Expiration Date of
Station  Market (1) (Watts) (2)  FCC Authorization
         
 KEGI  Jonesboro, AR  50,000  June 1, 2020
 KDXY  Jonesboro, AR  25,000  June 1, 2020
 KJBX  Jonesboro, AR  25,000  June 1, 2020
 WKNE  Keene, NH  50,000  April 1, 2022
 WSNI  Keene, NH  6,000  April 1, 2022
 WINQ  Keene, NH  6,000  April 1, 2022
 WZID  Manchester, NH  50,000  April 1, 2022
 WMLL  Manchester, NH  6,000  April 1, 2022
 WKLH  Milwaukee, WI  50,000  December 1, 2020
 WHQG  Milwaukee, WI  50,000  December 1, 2020
 WNRG  Milwaukee, WI  6,000  December 1, 2020
 WJMR  Milwaukee, WI  6,000  December 1, 2020
 KMIT  Mitchell, SD  100,000  April 1, 2021
 KUQL  Mitchell, SD  100,000  April 1, 2021
 WNOR  Norfolk, VA  50,000  October 1, 2019
 WAFX  Norfolk, VA  100,000  October 1, 2019
 WOGK  Ocala, FL  100,000  February 1, 2020
 WYND  Ocala, FL  6,000  February 1, 2020
 WNDD  Ocala, FL  6,000  February 1, 2020
 WNDN  Ocala, FL  6,000  February 1, 2020
 WRSI  Northampton, MA  3,000  April 1, 2022
 WPOR  Portland, ME  50,000  April 1, 2022
 WCLZ  Portland, ME  50,000  April 1, 2022
 WMGX  Portland, ME  50,000  April 1, 2022
 WYNZ  Portland, ME  25,000  April 1, 2022
 KICD  Spencer, IA  100,000  February 1, 2021
 KMRR  Spencer, IA  25,000  February 1, 2021
 WLZX  Springfield, MA  6,000  April 1, 2022
 WAQY  Springfield, MA  50,000  April 1, 2022
 WYMG  Springfield, IL  50,000  December 1, 2020
 WLFZ  Springfield, IL  50,000  December 1, 2020
 WDBR  Springfield, IL  50,000  December 1, 2020
 WQQL  Springfield, IL  25,000  December 1, 2020
 WNAX  Yankton, SD  100,000  April 1, 2021
           
 AM:         
 WISE  Asheville, NC  5,000  December 1, 2019
 WYSE  Asheville, NC  5,000(3) December 1, 2019
 KGMI  Bellingham, WA  5,000  February 1, 2022
 KPUG  Bellingham, WA  10,000  February 1, 2022
 KBAI  Bellingham, WA  1,000  February 1, 2022
 WINQ  Brattleboro, VT  1,000  April 1, 2022
 WBCO  Bucyrus, OH  500(3) October 1, 2020
 WSPO  Charleston, SC  5,000  December 1, 2019
 WINA  Charlottesville, VA  5,000  October 1, 2019
 WVAX  Charlottesville, VA  1,000  October 1, 2019
 WQEZ  Clarksville, TN/Hopkinsville, KY  1,000(3) August 1, 2020
 WKFN  Clarksville, TN  4,000(3) August 1, 2020
 KRNT  Des Moines, IA  5,000  February 1, 2021
 KPSZ  Des Moines, IA  10,000  February 1, 2021
 WHMQ  Greenfield, MA  1,000  April 1, 2022
 WPVQ  Greenfield, MA  2,500(3) April 1, 2022
 WSVA  Harrisonburg, VA  5,000  October 1, 2019
 WHBG  Harrisonburg, VA  1,000(3) October 1, 2019

(footnotes follow tables)

 PowerExpiration Date of
StationMarket (1)(Watts) (2)FCC Authorization
12 
AM:
WISEAsheville, NC5,000December 1, 2019
WYSEAsheville, NC5,000(5)December 1, 2019
KGMIBellingham, WA5,000February 1, 2022
KPUGBellingham, WA10,000February 1, 2022
KBAIBellingham, WA1,000(5)February 1, 2022
WKVTBrattleboro, VT1,000April 1, 2022
WBCOBucyrus, OH500(5)October 1, 2020
WINACharlottesville, VA5,000October 1, 2019
WVAXCharlottesville, VA1,000October 1, 2019
WRNDClarksville, TN/Hopkinsville, KY1,000(5)August 1, 2020
WKFNClarksville, TN1,000(5)August 1, 2020
KRNTDes Moines, IA5,000February 1, 2021
KPSZDes Moines, IA10,000February 1, 2021
WHMQGreenfield, MA1,000April 1, 2022
WSVAHarrisonburg, VA5,000October 1, 2019
WHBGHarrisonburg, VA1,000(5)October 1, 2019
WHCUIthaca, NY5,000June 1, 2020
WNYYIthaca, NY5,000June 1, 2020
WKBKKeene, NH5,000April 1, 2022
WZBKKeene, NH1,000(5)April 1, 2022
WFEAManchester, NH5,000April 1, 2022
WJYIMilwaukee, WI1,000December 1, 2020
WJOINorfolk, VA1,000October 1, 2019
WHMPNorthampton, MA1,000April 1, 2022
WGANPortland, ME5,000April 1, 2022
WZANPortland, ME5,000April 1, 2022
WBAEPortland, ME1,000April 1, 2022
WGINPortland, ME1,000April 1, 2022
KICDSpencer, IA1,000February 1, 2021
WHNPSpringfield, MA2,500(5)April 1, 2022
WTAXSpringfield, IL1,000December 1, 2020
WNAXYankton, SD5,000April 1, 2021
TV/Channel:
KOAM (DTV Ch 7)Joplin, MO/Pittsburg, KSDTV 14,800  June 1, 2022
KFJX (3) (DTV Ch 13)Joplin, MO/Pittsburg, KSDTV 5,600    June 1, 2022
KAVU (DTV Ch 15)Victoria, TXDTV 900,000August 1, 2022
KVCT(3) (DTV Ch 11)Victoria, TXDTV 11,350  August 1, 2022
KUNU-LD(4) (Digital Ch 28)Victoria, TXDTV 15,000  August 1, 2022
KVTX-LP(4) (Digital Ch 45)Victoria, TXDTV 15,000  August 1, 2022
KXTS-LD(4) (Digital Ch 19)Victoria, TXDTV 15,000  August 1, 2022
KMOL-LD(4) (Digital Ch 17)Victoria, TXDTV 15,000  August 1, 2022
KQZY-LP(4)(Digital Ch 33)Victoria, TXDTV 4,000    August 2, 2022

 

     Power  Expiration Date of
Station  Market (1) (Watts) (2)  FCC Authorization
         
 WHCU  Ithaca, NY  5,000  June 1, 2022
 WNYY  Ithaca, NY  5,000  June 1, 2022
 WKBK  Keene, NH  5,000  April 1, 2022
 WZBK  Keene, NH  1,000  April 1, 2022
 WFEA  Manchester, NH  5,000  April 1, 2022
 WJYI  Milwaukee, WI  1,000  December 1, 2020
 WJOI  Norfolk, VA  1,000  October 1, 2019
 WHMP  Northampton, MA  1,000  April 1, 2022
 WGAN  Portland, ME  5,000  April 1, 2022
 WZAN  Portland, ME  5,000  April 1, 2022
 WBAE  Portland, ME  1,000  April 1, 2022
 WGIN  Portland, ME  1,000  April 1, 2022
 KICD  Spencer, IA  1,000  February 1, 2021
 WLZX  Springfield, MA  2,500(3) April 1, 2022
 WTAX  Springfield, IL  1,000  December 1, 2020
 WNAX  Yankton, SD  5,000  April 1, 2021

 

 (1)Some stations are licensed to a different community located within the market that they serve.

 

 (2)Some stations are licensed to operate with a combination of effective radiated power (“ERP”) and antenna height, which may be different from, but provide equivalent coverage to, the power shown. The ERP of our television stations is expressed in terms of visual (“vis”) components. WHBG, WYSE, WISE, KPSZ, KPUG, KGMI, KBAI, WZBK, WBCO, WRND,WQEZ, WKFN, WPVQ(AM), WNYY, WHCU, WINQ(AM), WSVA and WHCUWLZX(AM) operate with lower power at night than the power shown.
12

 

 (3)We provide services to KFJX pursuant to an shared services agreement with the licensee of KFJX, Surtsey Media, LLC (“Surtsey”).  We program KVCT pursuant to a time brokerage agreement with Surtsey. See Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included with this Form 10-K for additional information on our relationship with Surtsey.

(4)KUNU-LD, KXTS-LD, KVTX-LP, KMOL-LD and KQZY-LP are LPTV stations that operate as “secondary” stations (i.e., if they conflict with the operations of a “full power” television station, the LPTV stations must change their facilities or terminate operations).

(5)Operates daytime only or with greatly reduced power at night.

 

Ownership Matters.   The Communications Act prohibits the assignment of a broadcast license or the transfer of control of a broadcast licensee without the prior approval of the FCC. In determining whether to grant or renew a broadcast license, the FCC considers a number of factors pertaining to the licensee, including compliance with the Communications Act’s limitations on alien ownership; compliance with various rules limiting common ownership of broadcast, cable and newspaper properties; and the “character” and other qualifications of the licensee and those persons holding “attributable or cognizable” interests therein.

 

Under the Communications Act (Section 310(b)), broadcast licenses may not be granted to any corporation having more than one-fifth of its issued and outstanding capital stock owned or voted by aliens (including non-U.S. corporations), foreign governments or their representatives (collectively, “Aliens”). The Communications Act also prohibits a corporation, without FCC waiver, from holding a broadcast license if that corporation is controlled, directly or indirectly, by another corporation in which more than 25% of the issued and outstanding capital stock is owned or voted by Aliens. The FCC has issued interpretations of existing law under which these restrictions in modified form apply to other forms of business organizations, including partnerships. Although weWe serve as a holding company for most of our various radio station subsidiaries (where we could not have more than 25% of our stock owned or voted by Aliens), we directly own two radio stations and two FM translators so that we cannot have more than 20% of our stock owned by Aliens. In 2013, the FCC releasedReview of Foreign Ownership Policies for Common Carrier and Aeronautical Radio Licenses Under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, IB Docket No. 11-133, Second Report and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 5741 (2013) (2013 Foreign Ownership Second Report and Order). On November 6, 2015, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) that proposes to extend the foreign ownership rules and procedures established in the 2013 Foreign Ownership Second Report and Order to broadcast licensees, with certain modifications to tailor them to this context. The NPRM also seeks comment on whether and how to revise the methodology a licensee should use to assess its compliance with the 25 percent foreign ownership benchmark in section 310(b)(4) in order to reduce regulatory burdens on applicants and licensees. Finally, the NPRM makes several proposals to clarify and update existing policies and procedures for broadcast, common carrier and aeronautical licensees. The Company cannot predict what action the FCC may take as a result of this NPRM.

The Communications Act and FCC rules also generally prohibit or restrict the common ownership, operation or control of a radio broadcast station and a television broadcast station serving the same geographic market. In its2006 Quadrennial Regulatory Review , released February 4, 2008, the FCC adopted a presumption, in the top 20 Nielsen Designated Market Areas (“DMAs”), that it is not inconsistent with the public interest for one entity to own a daily newspaper and a radio station or, under the following limited circumstances, a daily newspaper and a television station, if (1) the television station is not ranked among the top four stations in the DMA and (2) at least eight independent “major media voices” remain in the DMA. In all other instances, the FCC adopted a presumption that a newspaper/broadcast station combination would not be in the public interest, with two limited exceptions, and emphasized that the Commission is unlikely to approve such transactions. Taking into account these respective presumptions, in determining whether the grant of a transaction that would result in newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership is in the public interest, the Commission will consider the following factors: (1) whether the cross-ownership will increase the amount of local news disseminated through the affected media outlets in the combination; (2) whether each affected media outlet in the combination will exercise its own independent news judgment; (3) the level of concentration in the DMA; and (4) the financial condition of the newspaper or broadcast outlet, and if the newspaper or broadcast station is in financial distress, the proposed owner’s commitment to invest significantly in newsroom operations.

 

The FCC established criteria for obtaining a waiver of thehas adopted rules to permit the ownership of two television stations inextend to broadcast licensees the same DMArules and procedures that would not otherwise complycommon carrier wireless licensees use to seek approval for foreign ownership, with the FCC’s rules. Under certain circumstances, a television station may merge with a “failed” or “failing” station or an “unbuilt” station if strict criteria are satisfied. Additionally, the FCC now permits a party to own up to two television stations (if permitted under the modified TV duopoly rule) and up to six radio stations (if permitted under the local radio ownership rules), or one television station and up to seven radio stations, in any market (“Qualifying Market”) where at least 20 independently owned media voices remain in the market after the combination is effected. The FCC will permit the common ownership of up to two television stations and four radio stations in any market where at least 10 independently owned media voices remain after the combination is affected. The FCC will permit the common ownership of up to two television stations (if permitted under the FCC’s local television multiple ownership rule) and one radio station notwithstanding the number of voices in the market. The FCC also adopted rules that make television time brokerage agreements or TBA’s count as if the brokered station were owned by the brokering station in making a determination of compliance with the FCC’s multiple ownership rules. TBA’s entered into before November 5, 1996, are grandfathered until the FCC announces a required termination date. As a result of the FCC’s rules, we would not be permitted to acquire a television broadcast station (other than LPTV) in a non-Qualifying Market in which we now own any television properties. The FCC revised its rules to permit a television station to affiliate with two or more major networks of television broadcast stations under certain conditions. (Major existing networks are still subject to the FCC’s dual network ban). For more detailed information, see the discussion of recent FCC action under “Time Brokerage Agreements.”broadcast-specific modifications.

 

 13 

 

The revised rules and procedures allow a broadcast licensee to request in a petition for declaratory ruling under Title 47 U.S.C. Section 310(b)(4):

(1)approval of up to and including 100 percent aggregate foreign ownership of its controlling U.S. parent;
(2)approval for a proposed, controlling foreign investor to increase its equity and/or voting interests in the U.S. parent up to and including 100 percent at some future time without filing a new petition—this applies where the foreign investor would acquire an initial controlling interest of less than 100 percent; and
(3)approval for a non-controlling foreign investor named in the petition to increase its equity and/or voting interests in the U.S. parent at some future time, up to and including a non-controlling 49.99 percent equity and/or voting interest.

The revised rules would require the Company to seek specific approval only of foreign individuals or entities with a greater than 5 percent ownership interest (or, in certain situations, an interest greater than 10 percent).

The revised rules allow broadcast licensees that have foreign ownership rulings to apply those rulings to all radio and television broadcast licenses then held or subsequently proposed to be acquired by the same licensee and its covered subsidiaries and affiliates, regardless of the broadcast service (e.g., AM, FM, or TV) or the geographic area in which the stations are located.

The revised methodology provides a framework for a publicly traded licensee or controlling U.S. parent to ascertain its foreign ownership using information that is “known or reasonably should be known” to the company in the ordinary course of business.

For publicly traded licensees and U.S. parent companies (like the Company), the revised rules formalize the current equitable practice of recognizing a licensee’s good faith efforts to comply with Section 310(b) where the non-compliance was due solely to circumstances beyond the licensee’s control that were not known or reasonably foreseeable to the licensee.

 

We are permitted to own an unlimited number of radio stations on a nationwide basis (subject to the local ownership restrictions described below).  We are permitted to own an unlimited number of television stations on a nationwide basis so long as the ownership of the stations would not result in an aggregate national audience reach (i.e., the total number of television households in the DMAs in which the relevant stations are located divided by the total national television households as measured by DMA data at the time of a grant, transfer or assignment of a license. For purposes of making this calculation, UHF television stations are attributed with 50 percent of the television households in their DMA market) of 39%. The multiple ownership rules now permit opportunities for newspaper-broadcast combinations, as follows:

 

In markets with three or fewer TV stations, no cross-ownership is permitted among TV, radio and newspapers. A company may obtain a waiver of that ban if it can show that the television station does not serve the area served by the cross-owned property (i.e., the radio station or the newspaper).

In markets with between 4 and 8 TV stations, combinations are limited to one of the following:

(A)A daily newspaper; one TV station; and up to half of the radio station limit for that market (i.e ., if the radio limit in the market is 6, the company can only own 3) or

(B)A daily newspaper; and up to the radio station limit for that market; (i.e ., no TV stations) or

(C)Two TV stations (if permissible under local TV ownership rule); and up to the radio station limit for that market (i.e., no daily newspapers).

In markets with nine or more TV stations, the FCC has eliminated the newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership ban and the television-radio cross-ownership ban.

Under the rules, the number of radio stations one party may own in a local Nielsen Audio-rated radio market is determined by the number of full-power commercial and noncommercial radio stations in the market as determined by Nielsen Audio and BIA/Kelsey. Radio markets that are not Nielsen Audio rated are determined by analysis of the broadcast coverage contours of the radio stations involved.   Numerous parties, including the Company, have sought reconsideration of the multiple ownership rules. InPrometheus Radio v. FCC , Case No. 03-3388 (U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit), on June 24, 2004, the court remanded the case to the FCC for the FCC to justify or modify its approach to setting numerical limits and for the FCC to reconsider or better explain its decision to repeal the failed station solicitation rule, and lifted a previously-imposed stay on the effect of the revised radio multiple ownership rules. ByFurther Notice of Proposed Rule Making (2006 Quadrennial Regulatory Review), released July 24, 2006, the Commission solicited comments. The rules adopted in the2006 Quadrennial Regulatory Review were vacated in part by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals inPrometheus Radio Project v. FCC (652 F. 3d 432 (2011)) because the FCC’s procedures in the rule making proceeding did not satisfy the Administrative Procedure Act. The newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership rule was vacated, but the media ownership rules were affirmed. The FCC had created special benefits for so-called “eligible entities.” Because there was no data attempting to show a connection between the FCC’s eligible entity definition and the goal of increasing ownership of minorities and women under §309(j) of the Telecommunication Act of 1996, the “eligible entity” definition adopted was vacated as arbitrary and capricious. On April 15, 2014, theFCC released its 2014 Quadrennial Regulatory Review which consists of a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“FNPRM”) andReport and Order(“R&O”) incorporating the record of its2010 Quadrennial Regulatory Review into the FNPRM. (In the2010 Quadrennial Regulatory Review,the FCC also sought comment on whether television local news service (“LNS”) agreements and shared service agreements (“SSA”) are substantively equivalent to agreements that are already subject to the FCC’s attribution rules, and are therefore attributable now or should be in the future.) The FNPRM seeks comment on whether to eliminate restrictions on newspaper/radio combinations and the radio/television cross-ownership rule in favor of reliance on the local radio rule and the local television rule. The FCC proposed to retain the current local television ownership rule with a minor modification to update the previous analog contour provision in light of the digital transition. The FCC sought comment on whether to retain the prohibition on the cross-ownership of newspapers and television stations, and if so, whether the FCC should reform the restriction to consider waivers for newspaper/television combinations. The FCC proposed to retain the current local radio ownership rule and the dual network rule without modification. In addition, in theR&O, the FCC attributed to the brokering station same-market television JSAs that cover more than 15 percent of the weekly advertising time for the brokered station. 

 

Under the Communications Act, and the FCC’s “Local Ownership Rule,” we are permitted to own radio stations (without regard to the audience shares of the stations) based upon the number of full-power radio stations in the relevant radio market as follows:

 

Number of Stations  
In Radio Market Number of Stations We Can Own
   
14 or Fewer Total of 5 stations, not more than 3 in the same service (AM or FM), except the Company cannot own more than 50% of the stations in the market.
15-29 Total of 6 stations, not more than 4 in the same service (AM or FM).
30-44 Total of 7 stations, not more than 4 in the same service (AM or FM).
45 or More Total of 8 stations, not more than 5 in the same service (AM or FM).

 

 14 

 

 

In November 2017, the FCC ended its 2010/2014 Quadrennial Review proceeding wherein (effective February 7,2018) it (1) eliminated the newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule (which prohibited the common ownership of a daily print newspaper and a full-power broadcast station (AM, FM or TV) if the station’s service contour encompassed the newspaper’s community of publication); (2) eliminated the radio/television cross-ownership rule (which prohibited an entity from owning two or more television stations and one radio station in the same market, unless the market met certain size criteria); (3) revised the “Local Television Ownership Rule” to eliminate the so called – “Eight-Voices Test” and to modify the “Top-Four Prohibition” to better reflect the competitive conditions in local markets; (4) declined to modify the market definitions relied on in the “Local Radio Ownership Rule” (discussed above), but provided a presumption for certain embedded markets (smaller markets, as defined by Nielsen Audio, that are included in a larger parent market) transactions; (5) eliminated the attribution rule for television joint sales agreements; and (6) retained the disclosure requirement for shared service agreements involving commercial television stations. The FCC also adopted a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (“NPRM”) to seek comment on an “incubator” program to promote ownership diversity. In December 2018, the FCC adopted an NPRM to initiate the 2018 Quadrennial Review of its media ownership rules. The three rules subject to review are the Local Radio Ownership Rule, the Local Television Ownership Rule, and the dual network rule(which permits a television station to affiliate with an entity maintaining two or more broadcast television networksunlessthe two or more networks consist of two or more of the major networks (i.e., ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox) or one of these four networks and either the UPN or WB television network.) The FCC is seeking comment on whether, given the current state of the media marketplace, the FCC should retain, modify, or eliminate any of these rules. The Company cannot predict what, if any action, the FCC may take as a result of its review.

New rules to be promulgated under the Communications Act may permit us to own, operate, control or have a cognizable interest in additional radio broadcast stations if the FCC determines that such ownership, operation, control or cognizable interest will result in an increase in the number of radio stations in operation. No firm date has been established for initiation of this rule-making proceeding. New rules could restrict the Company’s ability to acquire additional radio and television stations in some markets and could require the Company to terminate its arrangements with Surtsey.markets. The Court and FCC proceedings are ongoing and we cannot predict what action, if any, the Court or the FCC may take to further modify its rules. Due to changes in local radio markets, the ownership of some of our radio stations, in the future, could exceed the current ownership limits imposed by the Local Ownership Rule. Their current ownership structure is “grandfathered” by the FCC. Absent a waiver, it might not be possible to sell all of them as currently configured in “clusters” to a single purchaser. The statements herein are based solely on the FCC’s multiple ownership rules in effect as of the date hereof and do not include any forward-looking statements concerning compliance with any future multiple ownership rules.

 

The FCC generally applies its ownership limits to “attributable” interests held by an individual, corporation, partnership or other association. In the case of corporations holding broadcast licenses, the interests of officers, directors and those who, directly or indirectly, have the right to vote 5% or more of the corporation’s stock (or 20% or more of such stock in the case of certain passive investors that are holding stock for investment purposes only) are generally attributable, as are positions of an officer or director of a corporate parent of a broadcast licensee. Currently, noneone of our directors has an attributable interest or interests in companies applying for or licensed to operate broadcast stations other than us.

 

The FCC’s ownership attribution rules (a) apply to limited liability companies and registered limited liability partnerships the same attribution rules that the FCC applies to limited partnerships; and (b) include an equity/debt plus (“EDP”) rule that attributes the other media interests of an otherwise passive investor if the investor is (1) a “major-market program supplier” that supplies over 15% of a station’s total weekly broadcast programming hours, or (2) a same-market media entity subject to the FCC’s multiple ownership rules (including broadcasters, cable operators and newspapers) so that its interest in a licensee or other media entity in that market will be attributed if that interest, aggregating both debt and equity holdings, exceeds 33% of the total asset value (equity plus debt) of the licensee or media entity. We could be prohibited from acquiring a financial interest in stations in markets where application of the EDP rule would result in us having an attributable interest in the stations. In reconsidering its rules, the FCC also eliminated the “single majority shareholder exemption” which provides that minority voting shares in a corporation where one shareholder controls a majority of the voting stock are not attributable; however, in December 2001 the FCC “suspended” the elimination of this exemption until the FCC resolved issues concerning cable television ownership.

 

15

On January 21, 2010, the FCC launched an initiative on the future of media and the information needs of communities in the digital age, which will examine the changes underway in the media marketplace, analyze the full range of future technologies and services that will provide communities with news and information in the digital age, and, as appropriate, make policy recommendations to the FCC, other government entities, and other parties. Initial topics under consideration include: the state of TV, radio, newspaper, and Internet news and information services; the effectiveness and nature of public interest obligations in a digital era; the role of public media and private sector foundations; and many others. Proposals are before the FCC whereby the government would take back part of the spectrum allotted for over-the-air television in favor of wireless broadband. The FCC is conducting a proceeding whereby broadcasters may voluntarily participate in a “reverse auction” of their over-the-air broadcast spectrum, otherwise agree to modifications in the spectrum available to them, move from the UHF to the VHF band (with or without compensations), or become subject to restrictions on their usage of the spectrum. The Company has filed an application with the FCC seeking to participate in the reverse auction, however, the Company is not obligated at this time, to relinquish any of its spectrum.

 

In addition to the FCC’s multiple ownership rules, the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission and some state governments have the authority to examine proposed transactions for compliance with antitrust statutes and guidelines. The Antitrust Division has issued “civil investigative demands” and obtained consent decrees requiring the divestiture of stations in a particular market based on antitrust concerns.

Programming and Operation.   The Communications Act requires broadcasters to serve the “public interest.” Licensees are required to present programming that is responsive to community problems, needs and interests and to maintain certain records demonstrating such responsiveness. Complaints from listeners concerning a station’s programming often will be considered by the FCC when it evaluates renewal applications of a licensee, although such complaints may be filed at any time and generally may be considered by the FCC at any time. Stations also must follow various rules promulgated under the Communications Act that regulate, among other things, political advertising, sponsorship identification, the advertisement of contests and lotteries, obscene and indecent broadcasts, and technical operations, including limits on radio frequency radiation. The FCC now requires the owners of antenna supporting structures (towers) to register them with the FCC. As an owner of such towers, weour subsidiaries are subject to the registration requirements. The Children’s Television Act of 1990 and the FCC’s rules promulgated thereunder require television broadcasters to limit the amount of commercial matter which may be aired in children’s programming to 10.5 minutes per hour on weekends and 12 minutes per hour on weekdays. The Children’s Television Act and the FCC’s rules also require each television licensee to serve, over the term of its license, the educational and informational needs of children through the licensee’s programming (and to present at least three hours per week of “core” educational programming specifically designed to serve such needs). Licensees are required to publicize the availability of this programming and to file quarterly a report with the FCC on these programs and related matters. On April, 27, 2012, the FCC released aSecond Report and Order that requires television stations to post their public files online in a central, Commission-hosted database, rather than maintaining the files locally at their main studios. It did not impose any new reporting obligation on the Company. The FCC did not adopt new disclosure obligations for sponsorship identification and shared services agreements as had been proposed (But see the discussion in “Time Brokerage Agreements” concerning the disclosure of JSAs. On January 29, 2016, the FCC released aReport and Order which expanded to cable operators, direct satellite TV providers, broadcast radio licensees, and satellite radio licensees the requirement thatto post public inspection files be posted to the FCC's online database.database rather than maintaining them in a local public inspection file. The Company’s radio stations located inpost their public inspection files to the top 50 radio markets must comply withFCC’s website. Posting these rules within 30 days afterfiles to the FCC’s online database renders the materials more widely accessible to the public. The FCC has announcedwarned licensees of possible enforcement action if these files are found not to be in compliance at the Federal Register thattime of license renewal.

The Company is required to pay (1) FCC filing fees in connection with its applications and an (2) annual regulatory fee determined by the Office of Managementnumber and Budget has completed its reviewcharacter of the new rules under the Paperwork Reduction Act. All other radio stations owned by the Company must comply with the new rule by Marchowns as of October 1 2018. of each prior year.

15

 

Equal Employment Opportunity Rules.   Equal employment opportunity (EEO) rules and policies for broadcasters prohibit discrimination by broadcasters and multichannel video programming distributors (“MVPDs”).distributors. They also require broadcasters to provide notice of job vacancies and to undertake additional outreach measures, such as job fairs and scholarship programs. The rules mandate a “three prong” outreach program; i.e., Prong 1: widely disseminate information concerning each full-time (30 hours or more) job vacancy, except for vacancies filled in exigent circumstances; Prong 2: provide notice of each full-time job vacancy to recruitment organizations that have requested such notice; and Prong 3: complete two (for broadcast employment units with five to ten full-time employees or that are located in smaller markets) or four (for employment units with more than ten full-time employees located in larger markets) longer-term recruitment initiatives within a two-year period. These include, for example, job fairs, scholarship and internship programs, and other community events designed to inform the public as to employment opportunities in broadcasting. The rules mandate extensive record keeping and reporting requirements. The EEO rules are enforced through review at renewal time, at mid-term for larger broadcasters (which the FCC has proposed to eliminate), and through random audits and targeted investigations resulting from information received as to possible violations. The FCC has not yet decided on whether and how to apply the EEO rule to part-time positions. Failure to observe these or other rules and policies can result in the imposition of various sanctions, including monetary forfeitures, the grant of “short” (less than the full eight-year) renewal terms or, for particularly egregious violations, the denial of a license renewal application or the revocation of a license.

 

Time Brokerage Agreements.Agreements.   As is common in the industry, we have previously entered into what have commonly been referred to as Time Brokerage Agreements (“TBAs”). which are sometimes termed Local Marketing Agreements.” Such arrangements are an extension of the concept of agreements under which a licensee of a station sells blocks of time on its station to an entity or entities which purchase the blocks of time and which sell their own commercial advertising announcements during the time periods in question. While these agreements may take varying forms, under a typical TBA, separately owned and licensed radio or television stations agree to enter into cooperative arrangements of varying sorts, subject to compliance with the requirements of antitrust laws and with the FCC’s rules and policies. Under these types of arrangements, separately-owned stations agree to function cooperatively in terms of programming, advertising sales, and other matters, subject to the licensee of each station maintaining independent control over the financing, programming and station operations of its own station. One typical type of TBA is a programming agreement between two separately-owned radio or television stations serving a common service area, whereby the licensee of one station purchases substantial portions of the broadcast day on the other licensee’s station, subject to ultimate editorial and other controls being exercised by the latter licensee, and sells advertising time during such program segments.

 

16

The FCC’s rules provide that a station purchasing (brokering) time on another station serving the same market will be considered to have an attributable ownership interest in the brokered station for purposes of the FCC’s multiple ownership rules. As a result, under the rules, a broadcast station will not be permitted to enter into a time brokerage agreement giving it the right to purchase more than 15% of the broadcast time, on a weekly basis, of another local station that it could not own under the local ownership rules of the FCC’s multiple ownership rules. The FCC’s rules also prohibit a broadcast licensee from simulcasting more than 25% of its programming on another station in the same broadcast service (i.e., AM-AM or FM-FM) whether it owns the stations or through a TBA arrangement, where the brokered and brokering stations serve substantially the same geographic area. The Company currently has no TBAs. 

 

The FCC’s multiple ownership rules count stations brokered under a JSA toward the brokering station’s permissible ownership totals, as long as (1) the brokering entity owns or has an attributable interest in one or more stations in the local market, and (2) the joint advertising sales amount to more than 15% of the brokered station’s advertising time per week. In December, 2014, the Commission adopted aNotice of Proposed Rulemaking and Report and Order in connection with its2014 Quadrennial Regulatory Review – Review of the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“Report and Order ”). The Commission adopted a new attribution rule for JSAs that applies when: (1) both broadcast television stations are licensed to the same DMA; and (2) the brokering station is authorized to sell more than 15 percent of the weekly advertising time of the brokered station. In these circumstances, the brokering station will have an attributable interest in the brokered station. The rule became effective on June 19, 2014. However, as a result of action by the U. S. Congress in 2015, stations that have a television JSA signed before the release of theReport and Order will have until October 1, 2025, to ensure that the agreement complies with the Commission’s media ownership rules or to come into compliance with the media ownership rules by another means. For example, if the local television ownership rule (47 C.F.R. § 73.3555(b)) prohibits the brokering station from having an attributable interest in more than one broadcast television station in the same DMA, the licensees of the affected stations would either have to terminate the agreement or modify the agreement to ensure that the brokering station is authorized to sell no more than 15 percent of the brokered station’s weekly advertising time, or the licensee of the brokering station would have to take other steps to avoid having an attributable interest in more than one broadcast television station in the market. Licensees that believe application of the attribution rule to their particular circumstances would not serve the public interest may seek a waiver of this rule. Likewise, licensees that believe application of the local television ownership rule would adversely affect competition, diversity, or localism may seek a waiver of that rule. Television JSAs entered into after the release of theReport and Order must comply with the Commission’s media ownership rules at the time they are executed; the compliance period does not apply to any television JSA entered into after the release of theReport and Order . TheReport and Order requires that all attributable television JSAs be filed with the Commission, and we have complied with this deadline.

We currently have a television TBA in the Victoria, Texas, market with Surtsey. On January 31, 2012, we entered into an agreement which included an extension of the grandfathered TBA for KVCT-TV and an assignable option with Surtsey for KVCT-TV. Even though the Victoria market is not a Qualifying Market such that the duopoly would otherwise be permissible, as discussed above, we believe that the TBA is “grandfathered” under the FCC’s rules and need not be terminated earlier than the date to be established in the ownership review proceeding. See “Ownership Matters” above.

16

On March 7, 2003 we entered into an agreement of understanding with Surtsey, whereby we have guaranteed up to $1,250,000 of the debt incurred by Surtsey in closing on the acquisition of a construction permit for KFJX-TV, a television station in Pittsburg, Kansas, serving the Joplin, Missouri television market. In consideration for our guarantee, Surtsey has entered into various agreements with us relating to the station, including a Shared Services Agreement, Agreement for Use of Ancillary Digital Spectrum and Agreement for the Sale of Commercial Time, which is considered by the FCC to be a JSA. On January 31, 2012, the Company and Surtsey amended these agreements and entered into an agreement which included an assignable option with Surtsey for KFJX-TV.

Other FCC Requirements.

  

The “V-Chip.”   The FCC adopted rules requiring every television receiver, 13 inches or larger, sold in the United States since January 2000 to contain a “V-chip” which allows parents to block programs on a standardized rating system. The FCC also adopted the TV Parental Guidelines, developed by the Industry Ratings Implementation Group, which apply to all broadcast television programming except for news and sports. As a part of the legislation, television station licensees are required to attach as an exhibit to their applications for license renewal a summary of written comments and suggestions received from the public and maintained by the licensee that comment on the licensee’s programming characterized as violent.

Digital Television.   Under the FCC’s rules all U.S. television broadcasters have been required to convert their operations from NTSC (analog) to digital television (“DTV”). DTV licensees may use their DTV channels for a multiplicity of services such as high-definition television broadcasts, multiple standard definition television broadcasts, data, audio, and other services so long as the licensee provides at least one free video channel equal in quality to the previous NTSC technical standard. Our full-service television stations and Low Power Television (“LPTV”) stations currently provide DTV service and have terminated NTSC operations. We hold licenses that authorize KOAM-TV to operate on Channel 7 for DTV and KAVU-TV to operate on Channel 15 for DTV. The FCC’s rules require broadcasters to include Program and System Information Protocol (“PSIP”) information in their digital broadcast signals.

Brokered Station KVCT is providing DTV service on Channel 11. KFJX-TV, with which KOAM-TV shares certain services, is providing DTV services on Channel 13.

In October 2003, the FCC adopted rules requiring “plug and play” cable compatibility which would allow consumers to plug their cable directly into their digital TV set without the need for a set-top box. In January 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated the rules. The Company cannot predict whether the FCC will adopt other proposals to address this matter. The FCC has adopted rules whereby television licensees are charged a fee of 5% of gross revenue derived from the offering of ancillary or supplementary services on DTV spectrum for which a subscription fee is charged. Licensees and “permittees” of DTV stations must file with the FCC a report by December 1 of each year describing such services. None of the Company’s stations to date are offering ancillary or supplementary services on their DTV channels.

White Spaces.   On September 23, 2010, the FCC adopted aSecond Memorandum Opinion and Order in ET Docket No. 04-186 that updated the rules for unlicensed wireless devices that can operate in broadcast television spectrum at locations where that spectrum is unused by licensed services. This unused TV spectrum is commonly referred to as television "white spaces." The rules allow for the use of unlicensed TV bands devices in the unused spectrum to provide broadband data and other services for consumers and businesses. It is possible that such operations have the potential for causing interference to broadcast operation, but we cannot yet judge whether such operations will have an adverse impact on the Company’s operations.

“Must-Carry” Rules.  The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, among other matters, requires cable television system operators to carry the signals of local commercial and non-commercial television stations and certain LPTV stations. Cable television operators and other MVPDs may not carry broadcast signals without, in certain circumstances, obtaining the transmitting station’s consent. A local television broadcaster must make a choice every three years whether to proceed under the “must-carry” rules or waive the right to mandatory-uncompensated coverage and negotiate a grant of retransmission consent in exchange for consideration from the MVPD. Such must-carry rights extend to the DTV signals broadcast by our stations. For the three-year period commencing on January 1, 2012, we generally elected “retransmission consent” in notifying MVPDs that carry our television programming in our television markets.

LPTV and Class A Television Stations.   Currently, the service areas of LPTV stations are not protected. LPTV stations can be required to terminate their operations if they cause interference to full power stations. LPTV stations meeting certain criteria were permitted to certify to the FCC their eligibility to be reclassified as “Class A Television Stations” whose signal contours would be protected against interference from other stations. Stations deemed “Class A Stations” by the FCC would thus be protected from interference. We own five operating LPTV stations, KUNU-LD, KVTX-LP, KXTS-LD, KMOL-LD, and KQZY-LD, Victoria, Texas, all of which operate in the digital mode. None of the stations qualifies under the FCC’s established criteria for Class A status.

17

Low Power FM Radio.   The FCC has createdThere exists a “low power radio service” on the FM band (“LPFM”) in which the FCC authorizes the construction and operation of noncommercial educational FM stations with up to 100 watts effective radiated power (“ERP”)ERP with antenna height above average terrain (“HAAT”) at up to 30 meters (100 feet). This combination is calculated to produce a service area radius of approximately 3.5 miles. The FCC’s rules will not permit any broadcaster or other media entity subject to the FCC’s ownership rules to control or hold an attributable interest in an LPFM station or enter into related operating agreements with an LPFM licensee. Thus, absent a waiver, we could not own or program an LPFM station. LPFM stations are allocated throughout the FM broadcast band, (i.e., 88.1 to 107.9 MHz), although they must operate with a noncommercial format. The FCC has established allocation rules that require FM stations to be separated by specified distances to other stations on the same frequency, and stations on frequencies on the first, second and third channels adjacent to the center frequency. The FCC has granted construction permits and licenses for LPFM stations. On January 4, 2011, the President signed into lawAs required by the Local Community Radio Act of 2010, which required the Commission to modify the rules authorizing the operation of LPFM, as proposed in MM Docket No. 99-25.  In an order released December 4, 2012, the FCC in 2012 modified its rules to implement the new law. The law requires the FCC to comply withmaintain its existing minimum distance separation requirements for full-service FM stations, FM translator stations, and FM booster stations that broadcast radio reading services via an analog subcarrier frequency to avoid potential interference by LPFM stations; and when licensing new FM translator stations, FM booster stations, and LPFM stations, to ensure that: (i) licenses are available to FM translator stations, FM booster stations, and LPFM stations; (ii) such decisions are made based on the needs of the local community; and (iii) FM translator stations, FM booster stations, and LPFM stations remain equal in status and secondary to existing and modified full-service FM stations.

 

On January 5, 2012, the FCC released a Report to Congress on the impact that LPFM stations will have on full-service commercial FM stations. The FCC “found no statistically reliable evidence that low-power FM stations have a substantial or consistent economic impact on full-service commercial FM stations,” and that “low-power FM stations generally do not have, and in the future are unlikely to have, a demonstrable economic impact on full-service commercial FM radio stations.” We cannot predict what, if any, impact the new LPFM stations will have on the Company’s full-service stations and FM translators.

 

Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service and Internet Radio.   In adopting its rules for the Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service (“DARS”) in the 2310-2360 MHz frequency band, the FCC stated, “although healthy satellite DARS systems are likely to have some adverse impact on terrestrial radio audience size, revenues and profits, the record does not demonstrate that licensing satellite DARS would have such a strong adverse impact that it threatens the provision of local service.” The FCC granted two nationwide licenses, one to XM Satellite Radio, which began broadcasting in May 2001, and a second to Sirius Satellite Radio, which began broadcasting in February 2002. The satellite radio systems provide multiple channels of audio programming in exchange for the payment of a subscription fee. The FCC approved the application of Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. and XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. to transfer control of the licenses and authorizations held by the two companies to one company, which is now known as Sirius XM Radio, Inc. Various companies have introduced devices that permit the reception of audio programming streamed over the Internet on home computers, on portable receivers, such as cell phones, and in automobiles. A number of digital music providers have developed and are offering their product through the Internet. Terrestrial radio operators (including the Company) are also making their product available through the Internet. We cannot predict whether, or the extent to which, such competing reception devices and DARS will have an adverse impact on our business.

 

Satellite Carriage of Local TV Stations.  The Satellite Home Viewer Improvement Act (“SHVIA”), a copyright law, prevents direct-to-home satellite television carriers from retransmitting broadcast network television signals to consumers unless those consumers (1) are “unserved” by the over-the-air signals of their local network affiliate stations, and (2) have not received cable service in the preceding 90 days. According to the SHVIA, “unserved” means that a consumer cannot receive, using a conventional outdoor rooftop antenna, a television signal that is strong enough to provide an adequate television picture. In December 2001 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld the FCC’s rules for satellite carriage of local television stations which require satellite carriers to carry upon request all local TV broadcast stations in local markets in which the satellite carriers carry at least one TV broadcast station, also known as the “carry one, carry all” rule. In December 2004, Congress passed and the President signed the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004 (“SHVERA”), which again amends the copyright laws and the Communications Act. The SHVIA governs the manner in which satellite carriers offer local broadcast programming to subscribers, but the SHVIA copyright license for satellite carriers was more limited than the statutory copyright license for cable operators. Specifically, for satellite purposes, “local,” though out-of-market (i.e., “significantly viewed”) signals were treated the same as truly “distant” (e.g., hundreds of miles away) signals for purposes of the SHVIA’s statutory copyright licenses. The SHVERA is intended to address this inconsistency by giving satellite carriers the option to offer Commission-determined “significantly viewed” signals to subscribers. In November, 2005, the FCC adopted aReport and Order to implement SHVERA to enable satellite carriers to offer FCC-determined “significantly viewed” signals of out-of-market broadcast stations to subscribers subject to certain constraints set forth in SHVERA. TheOrder includes an updated list of stations currently deemed significantly viewed. On November 23, 2010, the FCC released three orders that implemented the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 2010 (“STELA”). The FCC modified its Significantly Viewed (“SV”) rules to implement Section 203 of the STELA which amends Section 340 of the Communications Act to give satellite carriers the authority to offer out-of-market but SV broadcast television stations as part of their local service to subscribers. Section 203 of the STELA changes the restrictions on subscriber eligibility to receive SV network stations from satellite carriers. To implement the STELA, the FCC revised its satellite subscriber eligibility rules. The new rules could result in satellite carriers providing additional signals in DMAs where the Company operates television stations, but we cannot predict at this time, what, if any, impact the rules might have on the Company.

 1817 

 

 

In-Band On-Channel “Hybrid Digital” Radio.   The FCC has adoptedFCC’s rules permittingpermit radio stations to broadcast using in-band, on-channel (IBOC) as the technology that allows AM and FM stations to operate using the IBOC systems developed by iBiquity Digital Corporation. This technology has become commonly known as “hybrid digital” or HD radio. Stations broadcast the same main channel program material in both analog and digital modes. HD radio technology permits “hybrid” operations, the simultaneous transmission of analog and digital signals with a single AM and FM channel. HD radio technology can provide near CD-quality sound on FM channels and FM quality on AM channels. HD radio technology also permits the transmission of up to three additional program streams over the radio stations.stations (which streams do not count as separate radio stations under the multiple ownership rules.) At the present time, we are configured to broadcast in HD radio on 55 stations and we continue to convert stations to HD radio on an ongoing basis.53 stations.

 

Use of FM Translators by AM Stations and Digital Program Streams.   FM translator stations are relatively low power radio stations (maximum ERP: 250 Watts) that rebroadcast the programs of full-power AM and FM stations on a secondary basis, meaning they must terminate or modify their operation if they cause interference to a full-power station. The FCC permits AM stations to be rebroadcast on FM translator stations in order to improve reception of programs broadcast by AM stations. The Company intends to continue to use some of its existing FM translators in connection with some of its AM stations. The Company is using some of its existing FM translators to rebroadcast HD radio program streams generated by some of its FM stations, which is permitted by the FCC. In a 2015 Report and Order, released October 23, 2015,Revitalization of the AM Service,the FCC announced an opportunity, restricted to AM licensees and permittees, to apply for and receive authorizations for newto relocate existing FM translator stations within 250 miles for the sole and limited purpose of enhancing their existing service to the public. On January 29, 2016,To implement this policy, the FCC opened a one-time only filing window during which only Class C and Class D AM broadcast stations may participate. That window will close on July 28, 2016, and a second window will open on July 29, 2016, during which only Class A and Class B AM broadcast stations may participate. That window will close on“filing windows,” the last one closing October 31, 2016. Thereafter,Some of the Company’s subsidiaries that are AM licensees, acquired FM translators and during the filing window, and relocated them to their local markets to pair with some of the Company’s AM broadcast stations. The FM translators so acquired must rebroadcast the related AM station for at least four years, not counting any periods of silence. The FCC plans to openlater opened two windows permittingfor the licenseesfiling of AM stations to applyapplications for a construction permitpermits for a new FM translator to enhance their existing service.translators, the final window closing January 31, 2018. In the filing windows, qualifying AM licensees maycould apply for one, and only one, new FM translator station, in the non-reserved FM band to be used solely to re-broadcast the AM licensee’s AM signal to provide fill-in and/or nighttime service.service on a permanent basis. The FM translator must rebroadcastCompany filed applications in both windows and obtained some construction permits as a result. If the relatedCompany should decide that a subsidiary should sell or suspend operations of an AM station for at least four years, not counting any periodswith such an FM construction permit or license, the subsidiary would also be required to sell or suspend operations of silence.the FM translator. In May 2018, the FCC adopted an NPRM proposing to streamline the rules relating to interference caused by FM translators and expedite the translator interference complaint resolution process. The Company is an AM licenseeproposals, if implemented, could limit or avoid protracted and is participatingcontentious interference resolution disputes, provide translator licensees both additional flexibility to remediate interference and additional investment certainty, and allow expedited resolution of interference claims by affected stations. The rule changes proposed in the filing opportunities.NPRM, among other things, would require more definite information in listener complaints and that listener complaints beyond a certain contour would not be actionable

Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976.   The Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice, the federal agencies responsible for enforcing the federal antitrust laws, may investigate certain acquisitions. Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, an acquisition meeting certain size thresholdsthreshholds requires the parties to file Notification and Report Forms with the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice and to observe specified waiting period requirements before consummating the acquisition. Any decision by the Federal Trade Commission or the Department of Justice to challenge a proposed acquisition could affect our ability to consummate the acquisition or to consummate it on the proposed terms. We cannot predict whether the FCC will adopt rules that would restrict our ability to acquire additional stations.

  

Changes to Application and Assignment Procedures.   In January 2010, theThe FCC has adopted a First Report and Orderrules that givesgive Native American tribes a priority to obtain broadcast radio licenses in tribal communities. The Order providesrules provide an opportunity for tribes to establish new service specifically designed to offer programming that meets the needs of tribal citizens. In addition, the First Report and Orderrules modified the Commission’sFCC’s radio application and assignment procedures, assisting qualified applicants to more rapidly introduce new radio service to the public. These modifications (1) Prohibit an AM applicant that obtains a construction permit through a dispositive Section 307(b) preference from downgrading the service level that led to the dispositive preference; (2) RequiresRequire technical proposals for new or major change AM facilities filed with Form 175 (i.e ., FCC “short-form” Auction) applications to meet certain minimum technical standards to be eligible for further auction processing; and (3) GivesGive FCC operating bureaus authority to cap filing window applications. On December 29,In 2011, the FCC released its Third Report and Order which limits eligibility for authorizations associated with allotments added to the FM Table of Allotments using the “Tribal Priority” to the tribes whom the Tribal Priority was intended to benefit. In a Public Notice released December 2, 2010 (GN Docket No. 10-244)October 2018, the FCC sought comment on how it could design, adopt, and implement an additional new preference program in its competitive bidding process for persons or entities that have overcome substantial disadvantage and would be eligible forreleased a bidding credit. In a“Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, released October 10, 2014, andRulemaking” as part of its ongoing effort to assist AM broadcast stations in theQuadrennial Regulatory Review NPRM , the Commission also soughtproviding full-time service to their communities. The FCC is seeking comment on a proposal for applicantstechnical proposals to be accorded licensing preferences if they could demonstrate that they have overcome “significant social and economic disadvantages.” The Company cannot predict whether such preferences will be adopted, or whether they would have any impact on the Company.

Spectrum Auctions and Channel Sharing.Congress passed and the President signed into law the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, (codified at 47 U.S.C. § 309(j)(8)(G) 47 U.S.C. § 1452) (2012) (“Spectrum Act”). In aReport and Order, released June 2, 2014, in GN Docket 12-268, the FCC adopted rulesreduce nighttime interference afforded to implement the Spectrum Act, including rules to implement the auction of broadcast television spectrum for use by other services. The FCC stated its mandate to protect full power and Class A television facilities that already were operating pursuant to a license (or a pending application for a license to cover a construction permit) on February 22, 2012, and to protect facilities in addition to those the statute requires the FCC to protect, based on consideration of the potential impact on the FCC’s flexibility in the repacking process and its auction goals. The FCC concluded that protecting other categories of facilities, including stations and television translator stations, would unduly constrain the FCC’s flexibility in the repacking process and undermine the likelihood of meeting its objectives for the incentive auction. To help preserve the services provided by LPTV and TV translator stations, the FCC will open a special filing window for such stations that are displaced to select a new channel and will amend its rules to expedite the process for displacedwide-area “Class A” AM radio stations to relocate. The reverse and forward spectrum auctions will be integrated in a series of stages.  Each stage will consist of a reverse auction and a forward auction bidding process, and additional stages will be run if necessary.  Broadcasters will indicate through the pre-auction application processenable more local AM stations to increase their willingness to relinquish spectrum usage rights at the opening prices.  Based on broadcasters’ collective willingness, the initial spectrum clearing target will be set. Then the reverse auction bidding process will be run to determine the total amount of incentive payments to broadcasters required to clear that amount of spectrum. The forward auction bidding process will follow the reverse auction bidding process.  Full power and Class A station licensees will be eligible to participate in the reverse auction. They may bid to voluntarily relinquish the spectrum usage rights associated with station facilities that are eligible for protection in the repacking process. Bidders will have the three bid options specified by the Spectrum Act: (1) license relinquishment; (2) reassignment from a UHF to a VHF channel; and (3) channel sharing. UHF-to-VHF bidders may limit their bids to a high (channels 7 to 13) or low (channels 2 to 6) VHF channel. Bidders will have the additional option to bid for reassignment from a high VHF channel to a low VHF channel. Potential bidders will have to submit certified applications. Between the short-form application filing deadline and the announcement of the results of the reverse auction and the repacking process, all full power and Class A licensees will be prohibited from communicating directly or indirectly any reverse or forward auction applicant’s bids or bidding strategies to any other full power or Class A licensee or forward auction applicant. The FCC will share forward auction proceeds with licensees that relinquish rights in the reverse auction as soon as practicable following the successful conclusion of the incentive auction. The FCC will reimburse costs reasonably incurred by television stations that are reassigned to new channels in the repacking process. The FCC will grandfather existing broadcast station combinations that otherwise would no longer comply with the media ownership rules as a result of the reverse auction.nighttime service. The Company has timely filed an application to participate inno Class A AM radio stations, but has Class B, Class C and Class D AM radio stations, some of which might benefit if the reverse auction.FCC’s changes its rules as proposed.

 

 1918 

 

 

The Company pays for the use of music broadcast on its stations by obtaining licenses from organizations called performing rights societies,e.g. Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”), which, in turn pay composers, authors and publishers for their works. Another organization, Global Music Rights, has begun issuing licenses for the composers, authors and publishers that it represents. Federal law grants a performance right for sound recordings in favor of recording companies and performing artists for non-interactive digital transmissions and Internet radio. As a result, users of music, including the Company, are required to pay royalties for these uses through Sound Exchange, a non-profit performance rights organization. In 2009, a bill, H.R. 848, the Performance Rights Act, wasPeriodically, bills have been introduced in Congress, but did not pass in the 111th Congress. Ifthat if passed, this bill would have required the Company to pay additional fees to an organization called MusicFirst which would distribute the money to other entities. Efforts continue by MusicFirstcertain organizations to persuade Congress to enact a law that would require such payments. We cannot predict whether suchPeriodically, bills have been introduced in Congress that, if adopted, would require the Company to pay additional fees to one or more organizations that would distribute the money to performers or other entities. In late 2018, Congress passed the “Music Modernization Act” which was signed into law by the President. The law (1) improves compensation to songwriters and streamlining how their music is licensed; (2) enables legacy artists (who recorded music before 1972) to be paid royalties when their music is played on digital radio; and (3) provides a consistent legal process for studio professionals, including record producers and engineers to receive royalties for their contributions to music that they help to create. The law might be enacted. Should suchcreates a blanket license for digital music providers to make permanent downloads, limited downloads, and interactive streams, creates a collective to administer the blanket license, and makes various improvements to royalty rate proceedings. This new law be enacted, it wouldcould impose an additional financial burden on the Company, but the extent of the burden would depend on how the fee payment requirement was structured.

 

On January 3, 2013, the FCC released theSixth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, which sought comment on the requirement that persons with attributable interests in broadcast licensees and other entities filing an FCC Ownership Report provide an “FCC Registration Number” (“FRN”) linked to their social security numbers. Questions had been raised about the security of the FCC’s Registration System where this data would be stored. On January 20, 2016, the FCC released itsReport and Order, Second Report and Order and Order on Reconsiderationthat implemented a Restricted Use FRN (RUFRN) that individuals may use solely for the purpose of broadcast ownership report filings. The FCC stated its belief that the RUFRN willwould allow for sufficient unique identification of individuals listed on broadcast ownership reports without necessitating the disclosure to the CommissionFCC of individuals’ full Social Security Numbers (SSNs). The FCC eliminated the availability of the Special Use FRN (SUFRN) for broadcast station ownership reports, except in very limited circumstances. On January 4, 2017, the FCC’s Media Bureau issued an Order or Reconsideration denying petitions for reconsideration of the requirement. On February 2, 2017, the FCC set aside the Order on Reconsideration and returned the petitions for reconsideration to pending status to be considered by the full FCC. The FCC is also seeking comment on whether to expand the biennial ownership reporting requirement to include interests, entities and individuals that are not attributable because of (a) the single majority shareholder exemption and (b) the exemption for interests held in eligible entities pursuant to the higher EDP threshold. The Company has utilized the single majority shareholder exemption in reporting ownership interests in the Company. The Company cannot predict whether these proposals will be adopted, and if so, whether information provided by those persons with a reportable attributable interest in the Company will be secure.

Proposed Changes.   The FCC has under consideration, and may in the future consider and adopt, new laws, regulations and policies regarding a wide variety of matters that could, directly or indirectly, affect us and the operation and ownership of our broadcast properties. Application processing rules adopted by the FCC might require us to apply for facilities modifications to our standard broadcast stations in future “window” periods for filing applications or result in the stations being “locked in” with their present facilities. The FCC is authorized to use auctions for the allocation of radio broadcast spectrum frequencies for commercial use. The implementation of this law could require us to bid for the use of certain frequencies.

 

 2019 

 

 

Executive Officers

 

Our current executive officers are:

 

Name Age Position
     
Edward K. Christian 7174 President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman; Director
Warren S. Lada61Chief Operating Officer
Samuel D. Bush 5861 Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Marcia K. Lobaito 6770 Senior Vice President, Corporate Secretary, and Director of Business Affairs
Catherine A. Bobinski 5659 Senior Vice President/Finance, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller
Christopher S. Forgy58Senior Vice President of Operations

 

Officers are elected annually by our Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board. Set forth below is information with respect to our executive officers.

 

Mr. Christian has been President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman since our inception in 1986.

Mr. Lada has been Chief Operating Officer since March 2016. He was Executive Vice President, Operations since from 2012 to 2016. He was Senior Vice President, Operations from 2000 to 2012 and Vice President, Operations from 1997 to 2000. From 1992 to 1997 he was Regional Vice President of our subsidiary, Saga Communications of New England, Inc.

 

Mr. Bush has been Senior Vice President since 2002 and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since September 1997. He was Vice President from 1997 to 2002. From 1988 to 1997 he held various positions with the Media Finance Group at AT&T Capital Corporation, including senior vice president.

 

Ms. Lobaito has been Senior Vice President since 2005, Director of Business Affairs and Corporate Secretary since our inception in 1986 and Vice President from 1996 to 2005.

 

Ms. Bobinski has been Senior Vice President/Finance since March 2012 and Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller since September 1991. She was Vice President from March 1999 to March 2012. Ms. Bobinski is a certified public accountant.

 

Mr. Forgy has been Senior Vice President of Operations since May 2018. He was President/General Manager of our Columbus, Ohio market from 2010 to 2018 and was Director of Sales of our Columbus, Ohio market from 1995 to 2006. He has been with Saga for 20 years.

20

Item 1A.Risk Factors

 

The more prominent risks and uncertainties inherent in our business are described in more detail below. However, these are not the only risks and uncertainties we face. Our business may face additional risks and uncertainties that are unknown to us at this time.

 

Global Economic Conditions and Uncertainties May Continue to Affect our Business

 

We derive revenues from the sale of advertising and expenditures by advertisers tend to be cyclical and are reflective of economic conditions. Periods of a slowing economy, recession or economic uncertainty may be accompanied by a decrease in advertising. The global economic downturn that began in 2008 caused a decline in advertising and marketing by our customers, which had an adverse effect on our revenue, profit margins and cash flows. Global economic conditions have been slow to recover and remain uncertain. There can be no assurance that any of the recent economic improvements will be broad based and sustainable, or that they will enhance conditions in markets relevant to us. If economic conditions do not continue to improve, economic uncertainty increases or economic conditions deteriorate again; global economic conditions may once again adversely impact our business. Due to the continued uncertain pace of economic growth, we cannot predict future revenue trends. Further, there can be no assurance that we will not experience future adverse effects that may be material to our cash flows, competitive position, financial condition, results of operations, or our ability to access capital.

 

21

The volatility in global financial markets may also limit our ability to access the capital markets at a time when we would like, or need, to do so, which could have an impact on our flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions. Accordingly, if the economy does not fully recover or worsens, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

 

We Have Substantial Indebtedness and Debt Service Requirements

 

At December 31, 20152018 our long-term debt, (including our guaranteeincluding a current portion of debt of Surtsey Media, LLC)$5,000,000, was approximately $36,365,000.$20,000,000. We have borrowed and expect to continue to borrow to finance acquisitions and for other corporate purposes. Because of our indebtedness, a portion of our cash flow from operations is required for debt service. Our leverage could make us vulnerable to an increase in interest rates, a downturn in our operating performance, or a decline in general economic conditions. The term loan principal under our credit facility amortizes in equal installments of 5% of the term loan during each year, however, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, as defined in the credit facility, no amortization payment is required. The credit facility is also subject to mandatory prepayment requirements, including but not limited to, certain sales of assets, certain insurance proceeds, certain debt issuances and certain sales of equity. Any outstanding balance under the credit facility will be due on the maturity date of August 18, 2020.June 27, 2023. We believe that cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our debt service requirements for interest and scheduled payments of principal under the credit facility. However, if such cash flow is not sufficient, we may be required to sell additional equity securities, refinance our obligations or dispose of one or more of our properties in order to make such scheduled payments. We cannot be sure that we would be able to effectaffect any such transactions on favorable terms, if at all.

 

Our Debt Covenants Restrict our Financial and Operational Flexibility

 

Our credit facility contains a number of financial covenants which, among other things, require us to maintain specified financial ratios and impose certain limitations on us with respect to investments, additional indebtedness, dividends, distributions, guarantees, liens and encumbrances. Our ability to meet these financial ratios can be affected by operating performance or other events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will meet those ratios. Certain events of default under our credit facility could allow the lenders to declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable and, therefore, could have a material adverse effect on our business. We have pledged substantially all of our assets (excluding our FCC licenses and certain other assets) in support of the credit facility and each of our subsidiaries has guaranteed the credit facility and has pledged substantially all of their assets (excluding their FCC licenses and certain other assets) in support of the credit facility.

 

21

We Depend on Key Personnel

 

Our business is partially dependent upon the performance of certain key individuals, particularly Edward K. Christian, our President and CEO. Although we have entered into employment and non-competition agreements with Mr. Christian, which terminate on March 31, 2021,2025, and certain other key personnel, including on-air personalities, we cannot be sure that such key personnel will remain with us. We do not maintain key man life insurance on Mr. Christian’s life. We can give no assurance that all or any of these employees will remain with us or will retain their audiences. Many of our key employees are at-will employees who are under no legal obligation to remain with us. Our competitors may choose to extend offers to any of these individuals on terms which we may be unwilling to meet. In addition, any or all of our key employees may decide to leave for a variety of personal or other reasons beyond our control. Furthermore, the popularity and audience loyalty of our key on-air personalities is highly sensitive to rapidly changing public tastes. A loss of such popularity or audience loyalty is beyond our control and could limit our ability to generate revenues.

We Depend on Key Stations

 

Historically our top sixfive markets when combined represented 44%41%, 43%41%, and 44%43% of our net operating revenue for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively. Accordingly, we may have greater exposure to adverse events or conditions that affect the economy in any of these markets, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenue, results of operations and financial condition.

22

Local and National Economic Conditions May Affect our Advertising Revenue

 

Our financial results are dependent primarily on our ability to generate advertising revenue through rates charged to advertisers. The advertising rates a station is able to charge are affected by many factors, including the general strength of the local and national economies. Generally, advertising declines during periods of economic recession or downturns in the economy. Our revenue has been and is likely to be adversely affected during such periods, whether they occur on a national level or in the geographic markets in which we operate. During such periods we may also be required to reduce our advertising rates in order to attract available advertisers. Such a decline in advertising rates could also have a material adverse effect on our revenue, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Our Stations Must Compete for Advertising Revenues in Their Respective Markets

 

Both radio and televisionRadio broadcasting areis a highly competitive businesses.business. Our stations compete for listeners/viewerslisteners and advertising revenues within their respective markets directly with other radio and/or television stations, as well as with other media, such as broadcast television and/or radio (as applicable), cable television and/or radio, satellite television and/or satellite radio systems, newspapers, magazines, direct mail, the Internet, coupons and billboard advertising. Audience ratings and market shares are subject to change, and any change in a particular market could have a material adverse effect on the revenue of our stations located in that market. While we already compete in some of our markets with other stations with similar programming formats, if another radio station in a market were to convert its programming format to a format similar to one of our stations, if a new station were to adopt a comparable format or if an existing competitor were to strengthen its operations, our stations could experience a reduction in ratings and/or advertising revenue and could incur increased promotional and other expenses. Other radio or television broadcasting companies may enter into the markets in which we operate or may operate in the future. These companies may be larger and have more financial resources than we have. We cannot assure you that any of our stations will be able to maintain or increase their current audience ratings and advertising revenues.  

 

22

Our Success Depends on our Ability to Identify, Consummate and Integrate Acquired Stations

 

As part of our strategy, we have pursued and may continue to pursue acquisitions of additional radio and television stations, subject to the terms of our credit facility. Broadcasting is a rapidly consolidating industry, with many companies seeking to consummate acquisitions and increase their market share. In this environment, we compete and will continue to compete with many other buyers for the acquisition of radio and television stations. Some of those competitors may be able to outbid us for acquisitions because they have greater financial resources. As a result of these and other factors, our ability to identify and consummate future acquisitions is uncertain.

  

Our consummation of all future acquisitions is subject to various conditions, including FCC and other regulatory approvals. The FCC must approve any transfer of control or assignment of broadcast licenses. Such acquisitions could be delayed by shutdowns of the U.S. Government. In addition, acquisitions may encounter intense scrutiny under federal and state antitrust laws. Our future acquisitions may be subject to notification under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and to a waiting period and possible review by the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. Any delays, injunctions, conditions or modifications by any of these federal agencies could have a negative effect on us and result in the abandonment of all or part of attractive acquisition opportunities. We cannot predict whether we will be successful in identifying future acquisition opportunities or what the consequences will be of any acquisitions.

 

Certain of our acquisitions may prove unprofitable and fail to generate anticipated cash flows. In addition, the success of any completed acquisition will depend on our ability to effectively integrate the acquired stations. The process of integrating acquired stations may involve numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of operations, the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns, risk of entering new markets, and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired stations.

 

Future Impairment of our FCC Broadcasting Licenses Could Affect our Operating Results

 

As of December 31, 2015,2018, our FCC broadcasting licenses represented 43.1%38.3% of our total assets. We are required to test our FCC broadcasting licenses for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that our FCC broadcasting licenses might be impaired which may result in future impairment losses. For further discussion, see Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates included with this Form 10-K.

23

  

Our Business is Subject to Extensive Federal Regulation

 

The broadcasting industry is subject to extensive federal regulation which, among other things, requires approval by the FCC of transfers, assignments and renewals of broadcasting licenses, limits the number of broadcasting properties that may be acquired within a specific market, and regulates programming and operations. For a detailed description of the material regulations applicable to our business, see “Federal Regulation of Radio and Television Broadcasting” and “Other FCC Requirements” in Item 1 of this Form 10-K. Failure to comply with these regulations could, under certain circumstances and among other things, result in the denial or revocation of FCC licenses, shortened license renewal terms, monetary finesforfeitures or other penalties which would adversely affect our profitability. Changes in ownership requirements could limit our ability to own or acquire stations in certain markets.  

 

23

New Federal Regulations or Fees Could Affect our Broadcasting Operations

 

There has been proposed legislation in the past and there could be again in the future that requires radio broadcasters to pay additional fees such as a spectrum fee for the use of the spectrum or a royalty fee to record labels and performing artists for use of their recorded music. Currently, we pay royalties to song composers, publishers, and performers indirectly through third parties. Any proposed legislation that is adopted into law could add an additional layer of royalties to be paid directly to the record labels and artists. While this proposed legislation did not become law, it has been the subject of considerable debate and activity by the broadcast industry and other parties affected by the legislation. It is currently unknown what impact any potential required royalty payments would have on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

 

The FCC May Decide to Terminate “Grandfathered” Time Brokerage Agreements

The FCC attributes time brokerage agreements and local marketing agreements to the programmer under its ownership limits if the programmer provides more than 15% of a station’s weekly broadcast programming. However, TBAs entered into prior to November 5, 1996 are exempt from attribution for now.

The FCC will review these “grandfathered” TBAs in the future. During this review, the FCC may determine to terminate the “grandfathered” period and make all TBAs fully attributable to the programmer. If the FCC does so, we and Surtsey will be required to terminate the TBAs for station KVCT-TV unless the FCC simultaneously change its duopoly rules to allow ownership of two stations in the applicable markets.

FCC Regulations May Restrict our Ability to Create Duopolies under Joint Service Agreements, which Could Harm our Existing Operations

In our Joplin market, we have created a duopoly by entering into a joint sales agreement (“JSA”). The FCC is required to review its media ownership rules every four years and eliminate those rules it finds no longer serve the “public interest, convenience and necessity.” In March 2014, the FCC initiated its 2014 quadrennial review with the adoption of a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM). Concurrent with its adoption of the FNPRM, the FCC adopted a rule making television JSAs attributable ownership interests to the seller of advertising time in certain circumstances. Under this rule, where a party owns a full-power television station in a market and sells more than 15% of the weekly advertising time for another, non-owned station in the same market under a JSA, that party will be deemed to have an attributable ownership interest in the latter station for purposes of the local television ownership rule. Parties to existing JSAs that do not comply with the newly adopted rule were given two years from the effective date of this new rule to modify or terminate their JSAs to come into compliance. This rule became effective on June 19, 2014. However, as a result of action by the U.S. Congress in 2015, stations that have a television JSA signed before the release of FNPRM will have until October 1, 2025, to ensure that the agreement complies with the Commission’s media ownership rules or to come into compliance with the media ownership results by another means. Although the FCC will consider waivers of the new JSA attribution rule, the FCC thus far has not granted such a waiver and has provided little guidance on what factors must be present for a waiver to be granted. This new rule may require us to amend or terminate our existing JSA with Surtsey for periods following October 1, 2025. For further details on the quadrennial review see “Federal Regulation of Radio and Television Broadcasting” in Item 1 of this Form 10-K

 

The FCC’s Vigorous Enforcement of Indecency Rules Could Affect our Broadcasting Operations

 

Federal law regulates the broadcast of obscene, indecent or profane material. The FCC has increased its enforcement efforts relating to the regulation of indecency violations, and Congress has increased the penalties for broadcasting obscene, indecent or profane programming, and these penalties may potentially subject broadcasters to license revocation, renewal or qualification proceedings in the event that they broadcast such material. In addition, the FCC’s heightened focus on the indecency regulations against the broadcast industry may encourage third parties to oppose our license renewal applications or applications for consent to acquire broadcast stations. Because the FCC may investigate indecency complaints prior to notifying a licensee of the existence of a complaint, a licensee may not have knowledge of a complaint unless and until the complaint results in the issuance of a formal FCC letter of inquiry or notice of apparent liability for forfeiture. We may in the future become subject to inquiries or proceedings related to our stations’ broadcast of obscene, indecent or profane material. To the extent that any inquiries or other proceedings result in the imposition of fines, a settlement with the FCC, revocation of any of our station licenses or denials of license renewal applications, our result of operations and business could be materially adversely affected.

 

24

New Technologies May Affect our Broadcasting Operations

 

The FCC has and is considering ways to introduce new technologies to the broadcasting industry, including satellite and terrestrial delivery of digital audio broadcasting and the standardization of available technologies which significantly enhance the sound quality of AM broadcasters. We are unable to predict the effect such technologies may have on our broadcasting operations. The capital expenditures necessary to implement such technologies could be substantial. Moreover, the FCC may impose additional public service obligations on television broadcasters in return for their use of the digital television spectrum. This could add to our operational costs. One issue yet to be resolved is the extent to which cable systems will be required to carry broadcasters’ new digital channels. Our television stations are highly dependent on their carriage by cable systems in the areas they serve. FCC rules that impose no or limited obligations on cable systems to carry the digital television signals of television broadcast stations in their local markets could adversely affect our television operations.  

24

 

New Laws or Regulations that Eliminate or Limit the Scope of our Cable Coverage Rights or Affect How We Negotiate Our Agreements, Could Have a Material Adverse Impact on our Television Operations

We no longer rely on “must carry” to obtain the retransmission of our full-power television stations on MVPDs. New laws or regulations could affect retransmission consent rights and the negotiation process between broadcasters and MVPDs and this may affect our negotiating strategies and the economic results we achieve in such negotiations.

Our low-power television stations do not have MVPD “must carry” rights. Some of our low-power television stations are carried on cable systems as they provide broadcast programming the cable systems desires and are part of the retransmission consent agreements we are party to. Where MVPDs are not contractually required to carry out low-power stations, we may face future uncertainty with respect to the availability of MVPD carriage for our low-power stations.

Retransmission Consent Agreements May be Terminated or Not Extended Following Their Current Termination Dates

We are also dependent, in significant part, on our retransmission consent agreements. Our current retransmission consent agreements expire at various times over the next several years. No assurances can be provided that we will be able to renegotiate all of such agreements on favorable terms, on a timely basis, or at all. The failure to negotiate future retransmission consent agreements could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Our ability to successfully negotiate future retransmission consent agreements may be hindered by potential legislative or regulatory charges to the framework under which these agreements are negotiated.

Retransmission Consent Revenue May Not Continue to Grow at Recent Rages and are Subject to Reverse Network Compensation

 

While we expect the amount of revenues generated from our retransmission consent agreements to continue to grow in the near-term and beyond, the rate of growth of such revenue may not continue at recent and current rates and may be detrimentally affected by network program suppliers seeking increased reverse network compensation and growing concentration in the cable television industry that may result in the amounts that cable operators are willing to pay for programming.

The Company is Controlled by our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

 

As of March 3, 2016,2, 2019, Edward K. Christian, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, holds approximately 63%65% of the combined voting power of our Common Stock (not including options to acquire Class B Common Stock and based on Class B shares generally entitled to ten votes per share). As a result, Mr. Christian generally is able to control the vote on most matters submitted to the vote of stockholders and, therefore, is able to direct our management and policies, except with respect to (i) the election of the two Class A directors, (ii) those matters where the shares of our Class B Common Stock are only entitled to one vote per share, and (iii) other matters requiring a class vote under the provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws or applicable law. For a description of the voting rights of our Common Stock, see Note 1112 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included with this Form 10-K. Without the approval of Mr. Christian, we will be unable to consummate transactions involving an actual or potential change of control, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then-current market prices.

  

We May Experience Volatility in the Market Price of our Common Stock

 

The market price of our common stock has fluctuated in the past and may continue to be volatile. In addition to stock market fluctuations due to economic or other factors, the volatility of our shares may be influenced by lower trading volume and concentrated ownership relative to many of our publicly-held competitors. Because several of our shareholders own significant portions of our outstanding shares, our stock is relatively less liquid and therefore more susceptible to price fluctuations than many other companies’ shares. If these shareholders were to sell all or a portion of their holdings of our common stock, then the market price of our common stock could be negatively affected. Investors should be aware that they could experience short-term volatility in our stock if such shareholders decide to sell all or a portion of their holdings of our common stock at once or within a short period of time.

 

25

Information technology and cybersecurity failures or data security breaches could harm our business

 

Any internal technology error or failure impacting systems hosted internally or externally, or any large scale external interruption in technology infrastructure we depend on, such as power, telecommunications or the Internet, may disrupt our technology network. Any individual, sustained or repeated failure of technology could impact our customer service and result in increased costs or reduced revenues. Our technology systems and related data also may be vulnerable to a variety of sources of interruption due to events beyond our control, including natural disasters, terrorist attacks, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, hackers and other security issues. While we have in place, and continue to invest in, technology security initiatives and disaster recovery plans, these measures may not be adequate or implemented properly to prevent a business disruption and its adverse financial and consequences to our business' reputation.

 

In addition, as a part of our ordinary business operations, we may collect and store sensitive data, including personal information of our clients, listeners and employees. The secure operation of the networks and systems on which this type of information is stored, processed and maintained is critical to our business operations and strategy. Any compromise of our technology systems resulting from attacks by hackers or breaches due to employee error or malfeasance could result in the loss, disclosure, misappropriation of or access to clients’, listeners’, employees’ or business partners’ information. Any such loss, disclosure, misappropriation or access could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, disrupt operations and damage our reputation, any or all of which could adversely affect our business.

  

25

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

 

Item 2.   Properties

 

Our corporate headquarters is located in Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan. The types of properties required to support each of our stations include offices, studios, and transmitter and antenna sites. A station’s studios are generally housed with its offices in business districts. The transmitter sites and antenna sites are generally located so as to provide maximum market coverage for our stations’ broadcast signals.

 

As of December 31, 20152018, the studios and offices of 2625 of our 28 operating locations, including our corporate headquarters in Michigan, are located in facilities we own. The remaining studios and offices are located in leased facilities with lease terms that expire in 8 months3.5 years to 96 years. We own or lease our transmitter and antenna sites, with lease terms that expire in 32 months to 7471 years. We do not anticipate any difficulties in renewing those leases that expire within the next five years or in leasing other space, if required.

 

No one property is material to our overall operations. We believe that our properties are in good condition and suitable for our operations.

 

We own substantially all of the equipment used in our broadcasting business.

 

Item 3.   Legal Proceedings

 

The Company is subject to various outstanding claims which arise in the ordinary course of business and to other legal proceedings. Management anticipates that any potential liability of the Company, which may arise out of or with respect to these matters, will not materially affect the Company’s financial statements.

 

Item 4.   Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable.

 

26

PART II

 

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

On January 16, 2013 the Company consummated a four-for-three stock split of its Class A and Class B Common Stock, resulting in an increase of issued and outstanding shares of approximately 1,219,000 and 199,000, respectively, for holders of record as of the close of business on December 28, 2012.

26

The Company’s Class A Common Stock trades on the NYSE MKTNASDAQ Global Market of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC under the ticker symbol SGA. There is no public trading market for the Company’s Class B Common Stock. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the Class A Common Stock as reported by the NYSE MKTNASDAQ for the calendar quarters indicated (prices for periods prior to the four-for-three stock split are adjusted for such split):

 

Year High Low  High  Low 
          
2014:        
2017:        
First Quarter $55.00  $42.28  $51.40  $47.55 
Second Quarter $50.93  $36.76  $51.95  $45.45 
Third Quarter $43.92  $33.58  $46.80  $37.75 
Fourth Quarter $45.49  $34.57  $46.60  $40.35 
2015:        
2018:        
First Quarter $45.61  $38.75  $42.60  $36.10 
Second Quarter $43.15  $37.51  $40.10  $36.50 
Third Quarter $40.80  $33.53  $39.00  $35.00 
Fourth Quarter $48.09  $33.57  $37.89  $30.05 

  

The closing price for the Company’s Class A Common Stock on March 3, 20164, 2019 as reported by the NYSE MKTNASDAQ was $39.92.$33.91. As of March 3, 2015,4, 2019, there were approximately 180165 holders of record of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, and one holder of the Company’s Class B Common Stock.

 

Dividends

 

On November 17, 2015During 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared afour quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per sharedividends and a special cash dividend of $0.25totaling $1.45 per share on its Classes A and B shares. This dividendThese dividends totaling $2.9approximately $8.6 million waswere accrued or paid during 2018. See Note 1 of the financial statements for specific details on December 11, 2015 to shareholders of record on November 30, 2015.the dividends.

 

On September 2, 2015During 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors declared afour quarterly cash dividends and a special cash dividend of $0.20totaling $2.00 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividendshares. These dividends totaling $1.2approximately $11.8 million waswere accrued or paid during 2017. See Note 1 of the financial statements for specific details on October 2, 2015 to shareholders of record on September 14, 2015.the dividends.

 

On June 10, 2015During 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors declared afour quarterly cash dividends and a special cash dividend of $0.20totaling $1.30 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividendshares. These dividends totaling $1.2approximately $7.6 million waswere paid during 2016. See Note 1 of the financial statements for specific details on July 10, 2015 to shareholders of record on June 22, 2015.

On March 25, 2015 the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend totaling $1.2 million was paid on April 17, 2015 to shareholders of record on April 6, 2015.

On December 3, 2014 the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share and a special cash dividend of $1.20 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend totaling $8.2 million was paid on December 29, 2014 to shareholders of record on December 15, 2014.

On September 23, 2014 the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend totaling $1.1 million was paid on October 17, 2014 to shareholders of record on October 3, 2014.

On June 30, 2014 the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend totaling $1.1 million was paid on July 25, 2014 to shareholders of record on July 11, 2014.

On November 21, 2013 the Company’s Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $1.80 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend totaling $10.3 million was paid on December 12, 2013 to shareholders of record on December 2, 2013.dividends.

 

 27 

 

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2015,2018, the number of securities outstanding under our equity compensation plans, the weighted average exercise price of such securities and the number of securities available for grant under these plans:

 

 (a) (b) (c)  (a)  (b)  (c)
     Number of Securities       Number of Securities
     Remaining Available for       Remaining Available for
 Number of Shares to   Future Issuance  Number of Shares to     Future Issuance
 be Issued Upon Weighted-Average Under Equity  be Issued Upon Weighted-Average Under Equity
 Exercise of
Outstanding
 Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
 Compensation
Plans
  Exercise of
Outstanding
 Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
 Compensation
Plans
Plan Category Options
Warrants, and Rights
 Warrants
and Rights
 (Excluding
Column (a))
  Options
Warrants, and Rights
  Warrants
and Rights
  (Excluding
Column (a))
             
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders:                 
Employees’ 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan  $ 421,376     $  520,665
2003 Stock Option Plan  $  
2005 Incentive Compensation Plan 135,824(1) $28.47(2) 464,565   109,176(1) $0.00(2) 396,719
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders:                 
None               
Total  135,824    885,941   109,176      917,384

 

 (1)Includes 106,789All 109,176 shares ofare restricted stock.

 

 (2)Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options.Options is $0.00 as they are all restricted stock.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities  

 

Not applicable.

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities  

 

The following table summarizes our repurchases of our Class A Common Stock during the three months ended December 31, 2015. All shares2018. Shares repurchased during the quarter were from the retention of shares for the payment of withholding taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock.stock and from the purchase of shares under our Stock Buy-Back Program.

 

           Approximate 
        Total Number  Dollar 
        of  Value of 
        Shares  Shares 
        Purchased  that May Yet 
     Average  as Part of  be 
  Total Number  Price  Publicly  Purchased 
  of Shares  Paid per  Announced  Under the 
Period Purchased  Share  Program  Program(a) 
October 1 - October 31, 2015  -  $-   -  $25,447,212 
November 1 – November 30, 2015  12,280  $42.55   522,514  $24,924,698 
December 1 – December 31, 2015  -  $-   -  $24,924,698 
Total  12,280  $42.55   522,514  $24,924,698 
           Approximate 
        Total Number  Dollar 
        of  Value of 
        Shares  Shares 
        Purchased  that May Yet 
     Average  as Part of  be 
  Total Number  Price  Publicly  Purchased 
  of Shares  Paid per  Announced  Under the 
Period Purchased  Share  Program  Program(a) 
October 1 - October 31, 2018  -  $-   -  $21,111,964 
November 1 – November 30, 2018  17,888  $37.280   -  $20,445,099 
December 1 – December 31, 2018  1,223  $31.405   1,223  $20,406,691 
Total  19,111  $36.904   1,223  $20,406,691 

 

 (a)We have a Stock Buy-Back Program which allows us to purchase our Class A Common Stock. In February 2013, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in the amount committed to the Buy-Back Program from $60 million to approximately $75.8 million.

 

 28 

 

 

Performance Graph

 

COMMON STOCK PERFORMANCE

 

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 20152018 of our Class A Common Stock against the cumulative total return of our New Index the NYSE MKTNASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies) and a New Peer Group selected by us consisting of the following radio broadcast companies: Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc., Cumulus Media Inc., Emmis Communications Corp., Entercom Communications Corp., Entravision Communications Corp., iHeart Communications, Inc., The Nielsen Company, Radio One Inc., Saga Communications, Inc., Salem Communications Corp., Sirius XM Radio Inc., Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc., and Townsquare Media, Inc. The Old Index was the NYSE American Stock Market (US Companies). The change to the New Index was a result of us listing on the NASDAQ instead of the NYSE American Stock Market in 2018. The Old Peer Group consisted of the following radio and/or television broadcast companies: Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc., CBS Corp., CC Media Holdings, Inc., Cumulus Media Inc., Emmis Communications Corp., Entercom Communications Corp., Entravision Communications Corp., The E.W. Scripps Company, The Nielsen Company, Radio One Inc., Saga Communications, Inc., Salem Communications Corp., Sirius XM Radio Inc., Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc., and Townsquare Media, Inc. The Old Peer Group consisted of the following radio and/or television broadcast companies: Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc., CBS Corp., CC Media Holdings, Inc., Cumulus Media Inc., Emmis Communications Corp., Entercom Communications Corp., Entravision Communications Corp., Journal Communications, Inc., The Nielsen Company, Radio One Inc., Saga Communications, Inc., Salem Communications Corp., Sirius XM Radio Inc. and Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. The change to the New Peer Group in 2015 was due to providing2018 provides a more comparable and similarly aligned Peer Group going forward given mergers and acquisitions withinin the industry.industry as well as the sale of our television stations during 2017. The graph and table assume that $100 was invested on December 31, 2010,2013, in each of our Class A Common Stock, the NYSE MKTNASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies) and the Peer Group and that all dividends were reinvested.  The information contained in this graph shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

 

Legend 
Symbol Total Return For: 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 
 Saga Communications Inc. 100.00 90.36 82.16 110.74 93.14 79.58 
                
 NYSE MKT Stock Market (US Companies) 100.00 105.09 81.73 91.90 101.08 93.84 
                
 CRSP Nasdaq Stock Market US 100.00 115.31 124.20 136.36 145.76 143.37 
                
 New Peer Group 100.00 98.02 104.65 107.33 115.18 104.15 
                
 Old Peer Group 100.00 93.27 91.40 104.38 105.68 90.15 

Legend

Symbol Total Return For: 12/10 12/11  12/12  12/13  12/14  12/15 
                    
 Saga Communications Inc. 100.00  143.79   186.14   277.80   251.01   228.23 
                         
 NYSE MKT Stock Market (US Companies) 100.00  91.23   100.21   110.47   116.09   90.28 
                         
 New Peer Group 100.00  125.53   166.60   256.56   239.30   234.50 
                         
 Old Peer Group 100.00  114.85   152.35   233.94   218.27   215.04 

The comparisons in the above table are required by the SEC. This table is not intended to forecast or to be indicative of any future return of our Class A Common Stock.

 29 

 

Item 6.   Selected Financial Data

 

 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
 2015(5) 2014(3)(4) 2013 (1)(2) 2012 (1)(2) 2011 (1)(2)  2018  2017 (2)(3)  2016 (2)(4)  2015 (2)(5)  2014 (2)(6)(7) 
 (In thousands except per share amounts)  (In thousands except per share amounts) 
                      
OPERATING DATA:                                        
Net Operating Revenue $132,856  $133,998  $129,478  $130,259  $125,273  $124,829  $118,149  $118,955  $111,792  $113,627 
Station Operating Expense  97,268   98,424   92,977   90,288   90,929   93,727   87,759   86,799   83,188   85,167 
Corporate General and Administrative  10,091   8,901   8,172   7,960   7,590   11,359   11,657   10,980   10,091   8,901 
Other operating (income) expense  541   (1,210)         
Other Operating (Income) Expense, net  61   55   (1,351)  509   (1,210)
Impairment of Intangible Assets  874   1,936   2,033            1,449      874   1,936 
Operating Income From Continuing Operations $24,082  $25,947  $26,296  $32,011  $26,754  $19,682  $17,229  $22,527  $17,130  $18,833 
Interest Expense $888  $1,064  $1,305  $1,733  $3,420  $946  $903  $744  $855  $1,032 
Net Income (Loss):                    
Net Income:                    
From Continuing Operations $13,414  $14,904  $15,050  $18,060  $12,885  $13,690  $22,246  $12,910  $9,146  $10,676 
From Discontinued Operations        223   (135)  (254)     32,471   5,276   4,268   4,228 
Net Income (Loss) $13,414  $14,904  $15,273  $17,925  $12,631 
Net Income $13,690  $54,717  $18,186  $13,414  $14,904 
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share:                                        
From Continuing Operations $2.31  $2.57  $2.62  $3.19  $2.28  $2.30  $3.77  $2.20  $1.58  $1.84 
From Discontinued Operations        0.04   (0.02)  (0.04)     5.50   0.90   0.73   0.73 
Earnings (Loss) Per Share $2.31  $2.57  $2.66  $3.17  $2.24 
Earnings Per Share $2.30  $9.27  $3.10  $2.31  $2.57 
Weighted Average Common Shares  5,706   5,700   5,681   5,659   5,651   5,829   5,803   5,761   5,706   5,700 
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:                                        
From Continuing Operations $2.29  $2.55  $2.60  $3.18  $2.28  $2.30  $3.77  $2.19  $1.56  $1.83 
From Discontinued Operations        0.04   (0.02)  (0.05)     5.50   0.90   0.73   0.72 
Earnings (Loss) Per Share $2.29  $2.55  $2.64  $3.16  $2.23 
Earnings Per Share $2.30  $9.27  $3.09  $2.29  $2.55 
Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares  5,740   5,753   5,745   5,672   5,656   5,829   5,807   5,771   5,740   5,753 
Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share $1.10   1.80   1.80   1.24     $1.45   2.00   1.30   1.10   1.80 

 

 December 31,  December 31, 
 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011  2018 (1)  2017 (2)(3)  2016 (2)(4)  2015 (2)(5)  2014 (2)(6)(7) 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
                      
BALANCE SHEET DATA:                                        
Working Capital $33,557  $30,554  $28,079  $27,066  $16,322  $45,430  $55,269  $36,727  $32,450  $29,476 
Net Property and Equipment $58,131  $55,187  $56,337  $58,462  $60,622  $59,103  $56,235  $49,174  $50,277  $47,514 
Net Intangible and Other Assets $98,545  $93,270  $94,806  $98,434  $98,752  $120,779  $116,360  $118,052  $106,399  $100,942 
Total Assets $204,571  $192,044  $193,224  $197,330  $190,334  $248,477  $248,769  $219,998  $203,464  $190,965 
Long-term Debt Including Current Portion $36,365  $36,078  $46,078  $58,828  $69,078  $20,000  $25,000  $35,287  $35,287  $35,000 
Stockholders’ Equity $122,816  $115,245  $109,701  $104,209  $92,975  $184,999  $179,465  $134,982  $122,816  $115,245 

(1)In January 2013,Reflects the Company consummated a four-for-three stock splitassets and liabilities of its Class AWOGK-FM, WNDT-FM, WNDD-FM, and Class B Common Stock. All share and per share information prior to the split has been adjusted to reflect the retroactive equivalent change in the weighted average shares.WNDN-FM acquired on December 31, 2018.

(2)In January 2013,On September 1, 2017, the Company sold WXVT-TV in Greenville, Mississippi.the Joplin, Missouri and Victoria, Texas television stations. The operatinghistorical results of WXVT-TV have been reported asoperations for the television stations are presented in the discontinued operations for all periods presented.
(3)Reflects the results of WCVL-FM operated under the terms of an LMA from February 1, 2015 until acquired on April 18, 2017.  Reflects the results of WCKN-FM, WMXF-FM, WXST-FM, WAVF-FM, WSPO-AM, W261-DG, W257BQ, WVSC-FM, WLHH-FM, WOEX-FM, W256CB, W293BZ acquired on September 1, 2017.
(4)Reflects the results of WLVQ-FM operated under the terms of an LMA from November 16, 2015 until acquired in February 2016.

 

(5)(3)Reflects the results of WSVA-AM, WHBG-AM, WQPO-FM, WWRE-FM, and WMQR-FM acquired in August 2015 and WSIG-FM acquired in September 2015. Reflects the results of WLVQ-FM operated under the terms of an LMA effective November 2015. In December 2015, the Company disposed of the Illinois Radio Network.

(6)In December 2014, the Company sold the Michigan Radio Network, the Michigan Farm Network, the Minnesota News Network, the Minnesota Farm Network.

 

(4)(7)Reflects the results of WFIZ-FM, acquired in January 2014.

(5)Reflects the results of WSVA-AM, WHBG-AM, WQPO-FM, WWRE-FM, and WMQR-FM acquired in August 2015 and WSIG-FM acquired in September 2015. In December 2015 the Company disposed of the Illinois Radio Network.

 

 30 

 

 

Item 7.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 1. Business, Item 6. Selected Financial Data and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Saga Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries contained elsewhere herein. The following discussion is presented on both a consolidated and segment basis. Corporate general and administrative expenses, interest expense, write-off debt issuance costs, other (income) expense, and income tax provision are managed on a consolidated basis and are reflected only in our discussion of consolidated results.

 

For purposesOn September 1, 2017 the Company sold its Joplin, Missouri and Victoria, Texas television stations. The historical results of businessoperations for the television stations are presented in the discontinued operations for all periods presented (see Note 4). As a result of the Company’s television stations being reported as discontinued operations the Company only has one reportable segment reporting, we have aligned operations with similar characteristics into two business segments: Radio and Television. The Radio segment includes twenty-four markets, which includes all ninety-nine of our radio stations and one Radio News Network that we disposed of onat December 31, 2015. The Television segment includes two markets2018 and consists of four television stations and five low power television (“LPTV”) stations.2017. Unless indicated otherwise, the information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements relates to the Company’s continuing operations. The discussion of our operating performance focuses on segment operating income because we manage our segmentsstations primarily on operating income. Operating performance is evaluated for each individual market.

 

We use certain financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) to assess our financial performance. For example, we evaluate the performance of our markets based on “station operating income” (operating income plus corporate general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, other operating (income) expenses, and impairment of intangible assets). Station operating income is generally recognized by the broadcasting industry as a measure of performance, is used by analysts who report on the performance of the broadcasting industry and it serves as an indicator of the market value of a group of stations. In addition, we use it to evaluate individual stations, market-level performance, overall operations and as a primary measure for incentive based compensation of executives and other members of management. Station operating income is not necessarily indicative of amounts that may be available to us for debt service requirements, other commitments, reinvestment or other discretionary uses. Station operating income is not a measure of liquidity or of performance in accordance with GAAP, and should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute, for our results of operations presented on a GAAP basis.

 

General

 

We are a broadcast company primarily engaged in acquiring, developing and operating broadcast properties. We actively seek and explore opportunities for expansion through the acquisition of additional broadcast properties. We review acquisition opportunities on an ongoing basis.

 

Continuing Operations - Radio SegmentStations

 

Our radio segment’sstation’s primary source of revenue is from the sale of advertising for broadcast on our stations. Depending on the format of a particular radio station, there are a predetermined number of advertisements available to be broadcast each hour.

 

Most advertising contracts are short-term and generally run for a few weeks only. The majority of our revenue is generated from local advertising, which is sold primarily by each radio markets’ sales staff. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, approximately 89%87%, 88% and 88%86%, respectively, of our radio segment’sstation’s gross revenue was from local advertising. To generate national advertising sales, we engage independent advertising sales representative firms that specialize in national sales for each of our broadcast markets.

 

Our revenue varies throughout the year. Advertising expenditures, our primary source of revenue, generally have been lowest during the winter months, which include the first quarter of each year. Political revenue significantly decreasedincreased in 20132018 and 2015 as they were non-election years. In 2014 we had significant increases in revenue2016 due to the increased number of congressional, senatorial, gubernatorialnational, state, and local elections in most of our markets.markets as compared to 2017.

31

 

Our net operating revenue, station operating expense and operating income vary from market to market based upon the market’s rank or size which is based upon population and the available radio advertising revenue in that particular market.

31

 

The broadcasting industry and advertising in general, is influenced by the state of the overall economy, including unemployment rates, inflation, energy prices and consumer interest rates. Our stations broadcast primarily in small to midsize markets. Historically, these markets have been more stable than major metropolitan markets during downturns in advertising spending, but may not experience increases in such spending as significant as those in major metropolitan markets in periods of economic improvement.

 

Our financial results are dependent on a number of factors, the most significant of which is our ability to generate advertising revenue through rates charged to advertisers. The rates a station is able to charge are, in large part, based on a station’s ability to attract audiences in the demographic groups targeted by its advertisers. In a number of our markets, this is measured by periodic reports generated by independent national rating services. In the remainder of our markets it is measured by the results advertisers obtain through the actual running of an advertising schedule. Advertisers measure these results based on increased demand for their goods or services and/or actual revenues generated from such demand. Various factors affect the rate a station can charge, including the general strength of the local and national economies, population growth, ability to provide popular programming, local market competition, target marketing capability of radio compared to other advertising media, and signal strength.

 

When we acquire and/or begin to operate a station or group of stations we generally increase programming and advertising and promotion expenses to increase our share of our target demographic audience. Our strategy sometimes requires levels of spending commensurate with the revenue levels we plan on achieving in two to five years. During periods of economic downturns, or when the level of advertising spending is flat or down across the industry, this strategy may result in the appearance that our cost of operations are increasing at a faster rate than our growth in revenues, until such time as we achieve our targeted levels of revenue for the acquired station or group of stations.

 

The number of advertisements that can be broadcast without jeopardizing listening levels (and the resulting ratings) is limited in part by the format of a particular radio station. Our stations strive to maximize revenue by constantly managing the number of commercials available for sale and by adjusting prices based upon local market conditions and ratings. While there may be shifts from time to time in the number of advertisements broadcast during a particular time of the day, the total number of advertisements broadcast on a particular station generally does not vary significantly from year to year. Any change in our revenue, with the exception of those instances where stations are acquired or sold, is generally the result of inventory sell out ratios and pricing adjustments, which are made to ensure that the station efficiently utilizes available inventory.

 

Our radio stations employ a variety of programming formats. We periodically perform market research, including music evaluations, focus groups and strategic vulnerability studies. Because reaching a large and demographically attractive audience is crucial to a station’s financial success, we endeavor to develop strong listener loyalty. Our stations also employ audience promotions to further develop and secure a loyal following. We believe that the diversification of formats on our radio stations helps to insulate us from the effects of changes in musical tastes of the public on any particular format.

 

The primary operating expenses involved in owning and operating radio stations are employee salaries, sales commissions, programming expenses, depreciation, and advertising and promotion expenses.

 

The radio broadcasting industry is subject to rapid technological change, evolving industry standards and the emergence of new media technologies and services. These new technologies and media are gaining advertising share against radio and other traditional media.

 

We are continuing to expand our digital initiative to provide a seamless experience across numerous platforms allowingmultiple platforms. Our goal is to allow our listeners and viewers to connect with our products wherebrands on demand wherever, however, and whenwhenever they want.choose. We continue to create opportunities through targeted digital advertising and an array of digital services that include online promotions, mobile messaging, and email marketing.

  

In addition, we continue the rollout of HD radio™. HD radio™ utilizes digital technology that provides improved sound quality over standard analog broadcasts and also allows for the delivery of additional channels of diversified programming or data streaming in each radio market.

 32 

 

 

During the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, our Columbus, Ohio; Des Moines, Iowa; Manchester, New Hampshire; Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Norfolk, Virginia markets, when combined, represented approximately 34%41%, 34%41%, and 34%43%, respectively, of our consolidated net operating revenue. An adverse change in any of these radio markets or relative market position in those markets could have a significant impact on our operating results as a whole.

 

The following tables describe the percentage of our consolidated net operating revenue represented by each of these markets:

 

 Percentage of Consolidated  Percentage of Consolidated 
 Net Operating Revenue  Net Operating Revenue 
 for the Years  for the Years 
 Ended December 31,  Ended December 31, 
 2015 2014 2013  2018  2017  2016 
              
Market:                        
Columbus, Ohio  7%  7%  7%  11%  11%  12%
Des Moines, Iowa  7%  6%  7%  7%  7%  8%
Manchester, New Hampshire  5%  5%  5%  5%  5%  6%
Milwaukee, Wisconsin  10%  11%  10%  12%  12%  12%
Norfolk, Virginia  5%  5%  5%  6%  6%  5%

 

During the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, the radio stations in our five largest markets when combined, represented approximately 36%48%, 32%48% and 39%49%, respectively, of our consolidated station operating income. The following tables describe the percentage of our consolidated station operating income represented by each of these markets:

 

 Percentage of  Percentage of 
 Consolidated Station  Consolidated Station 
 Operating Income (*)  Operating Income (*) 
 for the Years  for the Years 
 Ended December 31,  Ended December 31, 
 2015 2014 2013  2018  2017  2016 
              
Market:                        
Columbus, Ohio  8%  7%  8%  16%  15%  15%
Des Moines, Iowa  6%  5%  5%  6%  7%  7%
Manchester, New Hampshire  7%  7%  8%  6%  6%  9%
Milwaukee, Wisconsin  11%  10%  11%  14%  14%  14%
Norfolk, Virginia  4%  3%  7%  6%  6%  4%

 

 (*)Operating income plus corporate general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, other operating (income) expenses, and impairment of intangible assets.

 

 33 

 

 

Discontinued Operations - Television SegmentStations

We sold our television stations on September 1, 2017. All historical results of operations for the television stations are reported in the discontinued operations for all periods presented.

 

Our television segment’sstation’s primary source of revenue iswas from the sale of advertising for broadcast on our stations. The number of advertisements available for broadcast on our television stations iswere limited by network affiliation and syndicated programming agreements and, with respect to children’s programs, federal regulation. Our television stations’ local market managers determinedetermined the number of advertisements to be broadcast in locally produced programs only, which arewere primarily news programming and occasionally local sports or information shows.

 

Our net operating revenue, station operating expense and operating income vary from market to market based upon the market’s rank or size, which iswas based upon population, available television advertising revenue in that particular market, and the popularity of programming being broadcast.

 

Our financial results arewere dependent on a number of factors, the most significant of which iswas our ability to generate advertising revenue through rates charged to advertisers. The rates a station iswas able to charge are,were, in large part, based on a station’s ability to attract audiences in the demographic groups targeted by its advertisers, as measured principally by periodic reports by independent national rating services. Various factors affect the rate a station can charge, including the general strength of the local and national economies, population growth, ability to provide popular programming through locally produced news, sports and weather and as a result of syndication and network affiliation agreements, local market competition, the ability of television broadcasting to reach a mass appeal market compared to other advertising media, and signal strength including cable/satellite coverage, and government regulation and policies.

 

Our stations strivestrived to maximize revenue by constantly adjusting prices for our commercial spots based upon local market conditions, advertising demands and ratings. While there may behave been shifts from time to time in the number of advertisements broadcast during a particular time of day, the total number of advertisements broadcast on a station generally doesdid not vary significantly from year to year. Any change in our revenue, with the exception of those instances where stations arewere acquired or sold, iswas generally the result of pricing adjustments, which arewere made to ensure that the station efficiently utilizes available inventory.

 

Because audience ratings in the local market are crucial to a station’s financial success, we endeavorendeavored to develop strong viewer loyalty by providing locally produced news, weather and sports programming. We believe that this emphasis on the local market providesprovided us with the viewer loyalty we arewere trying to achieve.

 

Most of our revenue iswas generated from local advertising, which iswas sold primarily by each television markets’ sales staff. For the years8 months ended August 31, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2015, 20142016 approximately 83%, and 2013, approximately 85%, 83% and 82%,77% respectively, of our television segment’s gross revenue was from local advertising. To generate national advertising sales, we engageengaged independent advertising sales representatives that specialize in national sales for each of our television markets.

 

Our revenue varies throughout the year. Advertising expenditures, our primary source of revenue, generally have been lowest during the winter months, which include the first quarter of each year. Political revenue significantly decreasedincreased in 2013 and 2015 as they were non-election years. In 2014 we had significant increases in revenue2016 due to the increased number of congressional, senatorial, gubernatorialnational, state, and local elections in most of our markets.markets as compared to 2017.

 

The primary operating expenses involved in owning and operating television stations arewere employee salaries, sales commissions, programming expenses, including news production and the cost of acquiring certain syndicated programming, depreciation, and advertising and promotion expenses.

Our television market in Joplin, Missouri represented approximately 10%, 10% and 9% of our net operating revenues, and approximately 13%, 13% and 12% of our consolidated station operating income (operating income plus corporate general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, other operating (income) expenses, and impairment of intangible assets) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

 34 

 

 

Results of Operations

 

The following tables summarize our results of operations for the three years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.2016.

 

Consolidated Results of Operations

 

       2015 vs. 2014 2014 vs. 2013           2018 vs. 2017  2017 vs. 2016 (1) 
 Years Ended December 31, $ Increase % Increase $ Increase % Increase  Years Ended December 31,  $ Increase  % Increase  $ Increase  % Increase 
 2015 2014 2013 (Decrease) (Decrease) (Decrease) (Decrease)  2018  2017  2016  (Decrease)  (Decrease)  (Decrease)  (Decrease) 
 (In thousands, except %’s and per share information)  (In thousands, except %’s and per share information) 
Net operating revenue $132,856  $133,998  $129,478  $(1,142)  (0.9)% $4,520   3.5% $124,829  $118,149  $118,955  $6,680   5.7% $(806)  (0.7)%
Station operating expense  97,268   98,424   92,977   (1,156)  (1.2)%  5,447   5.9%  93,727   87,759   86,799   5,968   6.8%  960   1.1%
Corporate G&A  10,091   8,901   8,172   1,190   13.4%  729   8.9%  11,359   11,657   10,980   (298)  (2.6)%  677   6.2%
Other operating expense (income), net  541   (1,210)     1,751   N/M   (1,210)  N/M   61   55   (1,351)  6   N/M   1,406   N/M 
Impairment of intangible assets  874   1,936   2,033   (1,062)  (54.9)%  (97)  (4.8)%     1,449      (1,449)  N/M   1,449   N/M 
Operating income from continuing operations  24,082   25,947   26,296   (1,865)  (7.2)%  (349)  (1.3)%  19,682   17,229   22,527   2,453   14.2%  (5,298)  (23.5)%
Interest expense  888   1,064   1,305   (176)  (16.5)%  (241)  (18.5)%  946   903   744   43   4.8%  159   21.4%
Write-off debt issuance costs  557      55   557   N/M   (55)  N/M 
Other income  (417)  (71)  (106)  (346)  N/M   35   33.0%
Income from continuing operations before income tax  23,054   24,954   25,042   (1,900)  (7.6)%  (88)  (0.4)%
Income tax provision  9,640   10,050   9,992   (410)  (4.1)%  58   0.6%
Income from continuing operations, net of income tax  13,414   14,904   15,050   (1,490)  (10.0)%  (146)  (1.0)%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax        223         (223)  N/M 
Interest (income)  (631)        (631)  N/M       
Other (income) expense  (23)        (23)  N/M       
Income from continuing operations before taxes  19,390   16,326   21,783   3,064   18.8%  (5,457)  (25.1)%
Income tax expense (benefit)  5,700   (5,920)  8,873   11,620   N/M   (14,793)  N/M 
Income from continuing operations, net of tax  13,690   22,246   12,910   (8,556)  (38.5)%  9,336   N/M 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax     32,471   5,276   (32,471)  N/M   27,195   N/M 
Net income $13,414  $14,904  $15,273  $(1,490)  (10.0)% $(369)  (2.4)% $13,690  $54,717  $18,186  $(41,027)  N/M  $36,531   N/M 
Earnings (loss) per share:                            
Earnings per share:                            
From continuing operations $2.29  $2.55  $2.60  $(0.26)  (10.2)% $(0.05)  (1.9)% $2.30  $3.77  $2.19  $(1.47)  39.0% $1.58   72.2%
From discontinued operations        0.04         (0.04)  N/M      5.50   0.90   (5.50)  N/M   4.60   N/M 
Earnings per share (fully diluted) $2.29  $2.55  $2.64  $(0.26)  (10.2)% $(0.09)  (3.4)%
Earnings per share (diluted) $2.30  $9.27  $3.09  $(6.97)  N/M  $6.18   N/M 

 

 35 

 

 

Radio Broadcasting SegmentResults of Discontinued Operations

 

           2015 vs. 2014  2014 vs. 2013 
  Years Ended December 31,  $ Increase  % Increase  $ Increase  % Increase 
  2015  2014  2013  (Decrease)  (Decrease)  (Decrease)  (Decrease) 
  (In thousands, except %’s) 
Net operating revenue $111,792  $113,627  $109,818  $(1,835)  (1.6)% $3,809   3.5%
Station operating expense  83,188   85,167   79,933   (1,979)  (2.3)%  5,234   6.5%
Other operating expense (income), net  499   (1,210)     1,709   N/M   (1,210)  N/M 
Impairment of intangible assets  874   1,936   2,033   (1,062)  (54.9)%  (97)  (4.8)%
Operating income $27,231  $27,734  $27,852  $(503)  (1.8)% $(118)  (0.4)%
           2018 vs. 2017  2017 vs. 2016 
  Years Ended December 31,  $ Increase  % Increase  $ Increase  % Increase 
  2018  2017(1)  2016  (Decrease)  (Decrease)  (Decrease)  (Decrease) 
  (In thousands, except %’s and per share information) 
Net operating revenue $  $14,238  $23,636  $(14,238)  N/M  $(9,398)  (39.8)%
Station operating expense     9,757   14,743   (9,757)  N/M   (4,986)  (33.8)%
Other operating expense (income)     31   (42)  (31)  N/M   73   N/M 
Operating income from discontinued operations     4,450   8,935   (4,450)  N/M   (4,485)  (50.2)%
Interest expense     21   32   (21)  N/M   (11)  (34.4)%
Other income                     
Income before income taxes from discontinued operations     4,429   8,903   (4,429)  N/M   (4,474)  (50.3)%
Pretax gain on the disposal of discontinued operations     50,842      (50,842)  N/M   50,842   N/M 
Total pretax gain on discontinued operations     55,271   8,903   (55,271)  N/M   46,368   N/M 
Income tax expense     22,800   3,627   (22,800)  N/M   19,173   N/M 
Income from discontinued operations $  $32,471  $5,276  $(32,471)  N/M  $27,195   N/M 

(1)Results of operations for the Television stations are reflected through August 31, 2017. The effective date of the sale was September 1, 2017.

 

Television Broadcasting Segment

           2014 vs. 2013  2014 vs. 2013 
  Years Ended December 31,  $ Increase  % Increase  $ Increase  % Increase 
  2015  2014  2013  (Decrease)  (Decrease)  (Decrease)  (Decrease) 
  (In thousands, except %’s) 
Net operating revenue $21,064  $20,371  $19,660  $693   3.4% $711   3.6%
Station operating expense  14,080   13,257   13,044   823   6.2%  213   1.6%
Other operating expense  32         32   N/M      N/M 
Operating income $6,952  $7,114  $6,616  $(162)  (2.3)% $498   7.5%

N/M=M = Not meaningfulMeaningful

 

 36 

 

 

Reconciliation of segment operating income to consolidated operating income from continuing operations:

        Corporate    
Year Ended December 31, 2015: Radio  Television  and Other  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
Net operating revenue $111,792  $21,064  $  $132,856 
Station operating expense  83,188   14,080      97,268 
Corporate general and administrative        10,091   10,091 
Other operating expense  499   32   10   541 
Impairment of intangible assets  874         874 
Operating income (loss) from continuing operations $27,231  $6,952  $(10,101) $24,082 

        Corporate    
Year Ended December 31, 2014: Radio  Television  and Other  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
Net operating revenue $113,627  $20,371  $  $133,998 
Station operating expense  85,167   13,257      98,424 
Corporate general and administrative        8,901   8,901 
Other operating (income) expense  (1,210)        (1,210)
Impairment of intangible assets  1,936         1,936 
Operating income (loss) from continuing operations $27,734  $7,114  $(8,901) $25,947 

        Corporate    
Year Ended December 31, 2013: Radio  Television  and Other  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
Net operating revenue $109,818  $19,660  $  $129,478 
Station operating expense  79,933   13,044      92,977 
Corporate general and administrative        8,172   8,172 
Impairment of intangible assets  2,033         2,033 
Operating income (loss) from continuing operations $27,852  $6,616  $(8,172) $26,296 

Year Ended December 31, 20152018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014

Consolidated2017

 

For the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, consolidated net operating revenue was $132,856,000$124,829,000 compared with $133,998,000$118,949,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease2017, an increase of $1,142,000$6,680,000 or less than 1%5.7%. We had a decreasean increase of approximately $666,000 generated by stations we owned or operated for the comparable period in 2014 (“same station”), and a decrease in net operating revenue of approximately $476,000$5,440,000 that was attributable to stations that we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period.period, and an increase of $1,240,000 generated by stations we owned or operated for the comparable period in 2017 (“same station”). The decreaseincrease in same station revenue was due to decreasesprimarily the result of increases in gross political revenue, and gross national revenue of $3,140,000,$1,321,000, gross political revenue of $1,279,000, and $1,219,000, respectively,gross non-spot revenue of $458,000 from 2014.2017 partially offset by a decrease in gross local revenue of $1,811,000. The decreaseincrease in gross national revenue is due to increases in our Champaign, Illinois; Manchester, New Hampshire; Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Norfolk, Virginia markets. The increase in gross political revenue was due to a lowerhigher number of congressional, senatorial, gubernatorialnational, state and local elections in most of our markets. The increase in gross non-spot revenue is due to increases in our Ithaca, New York and Yankton, South Dakota markets. The decrease in gross national revenue was primarily attributable to declines in our Illinois Radio Network, Manchester, New Hampshire, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and Victoria, Texas markets. These decreases to revenue were partially offset by increases in gross retransmission revenue, gross interactive revenue, gross non-spot revenue, and gross local revenue of $1,616,000, $615,000, $389,000 and $362,000, respectively and a decrease in agency commission of $733,000 from 2014. The increase in gross retransmission revenue was due to increasesdecreases in both of our television markets during 2015. Gross interactive revenue increased primarily due to increased targeted display advertising sales in most of our radioChampaign, Illinois; Des Moines, Iowa; Harrisonburg, Virginia; Jonesboro, Arkansas; Northampton, Massachusetts and Springfield, Massachusetts markets. We had increases in gross non-spot revenue at our Manchester, New Hampshire and Milwaukee, Wisconsin markets. Gross local revenue increased 0.3%. Of the decrease in revenue attributable to stations we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period $2,398,000 was attributable to the radio information networks which we sold in 2014 and therefore had no revenue in 2015, offset by a $1,922,000 increase in revenue attributable to stations we acquired in 2015.

 

Station operating expense was $97,268,000$93,727,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, compared with $98,424,000$87,759,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease2017, an increase of $1,156,000$5,968,000 or 1.2%6.8%. The overall decreaseWe had an increase of approximately $5,326,000 that was attributable to a decrease in station operating expenses of $661,000 for those stations we owned and operated for the entire comparable period and a decrease of $495,000 attributable to stations that we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period.period, and an increase of approximately $642,000 generated by stations we owned or operated for the comparable period in 2017. The decreaseincrease is primarily attributable to an increase in same station is primarilyhealthcare costs of $365,000 and an increase in music licensing fees of $283,000 related to a credit we received in the third quarter of 2017 resulting from SESAC arbitration.

Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $19,682,000 compared to $17,229,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $2,453,000 or 14.2%. The increase was a result of a decreasethe increase in licensing agreements of $1,434,000net operating revenue partially offset by increases in sales commissions of $309,000, computer software fees of $293,000 and compensation related expenses of $184,000. Of the decrease in station operating expense attributable to stations we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period $2,258,000 was attributable to the radio information networks which we sold in 2014 and therefore had no expenses in 2015, offset by a $1,763,000 increase in station operating expense, described above, a decrease in our corporate general and administrative expenses of $298,000 or 2.6%, an increase in other operating expense of $6,000 from 2017 and an impairment charge of $1,449,000 in 2017. The decrease in corporate expenses is due to a decrease in key man life insurance of $220,000, and a decrease of $100,000 in compensation costs.

Income from continuing operations, net of tax for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $13,690,000 compared to $22,246,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $8,556,000 or 38.5%. The decrease in income from continuing operations, net of tax is primarily due to the income tax benefit of approximately $11.5 million in 2017 due to a decrease in the deferred tax rate for federal income tax from 35% to 21% as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, partially offset by the increase in operating income in 2018, described above, an increase in interest expense of $43,000 due to an increase in our interest rates, an increase in interest income of $631,000 and an increase in other income of $23,000. See Note 7 of the financial statements for more information on the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The increase in interest income is attributable to an increase in interest and dividend income earned on cash and cash equivalents. The increase in other income is due to insurance proceeds resulting from damage to the roof of our building in our Bellingham, Washington market.

We generated net income of $13,690,000 ($2.30 per share on a fully diluted basis) during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $54,717,000 ($9.27 per share on a fully diluted basis) for the year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $41,027,000. This is a direct result of the decrease in income from continuing operations, net of tax of $8,556,000 and a decrease in income from discontinued operations, net of tax of $32,471,000 due to the sale of the television stations we acquired in 2015.September 2017 and the related gain recognized on the sale. 

 

 37 

 

 

Operating income from continuing operationsYear Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016

For the year ended December 31, 2017, consolidated net operating revenue was $118,149,000 compared with $118,955,000 for the year ended December 31, 20152016, a decrease of $806,000 or 0.7%. We had an increase of approximately $2,885,000 that was $24,082,000 comparedattributable to $25,947,000stations that we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period, offset by a decrease of $3,691,000 generated by stations we owned or operated for the comparable period in 2016 (“same station”). The decrease in same station revenue was primarily the result of decreases in gross political revenue of $2,260,000, and gross local revenue of $1,587,000 from 2016. The decrease in gross political revenue was due to a lower number of national, state and local elections in most of our markets. The decrease in gross local revenue was due to decreases in our Bellingham, Washington; Columbus, Ohio and Springfield, Illinois markets.

Station operating expense was $87,759,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, compared with $86,799,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, an increase of $960,000 or 1.1%. We had an increase of approximately $2,442,000 that was attributable to stations that we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period, offset by a decrease of $1,865,000,approximately $1,482,000 generated by stations we owned or 7.2%operated for the comparable period in 2016. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease of $710,000 in licensing agreements, $387,000 in commission expenses due to lower revenues and $346,000 in compensation costs.

Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $17,229,000 compared to $22,527,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $5,298,000 or 23.5%. The decrease was a result of the decrease in net operating revenue offset byand the decreaseincrease in station operating expense, described above, combined with a $1,190,000, or 13.4%an increase in our corporate general and administrative expense,expenses of $677,000 or 6.2%, an impairment charge of $1,449,000 in 2017 and an increasea decrease in other operating expenseincome of $1,751,000. Operating income for 2015 and 2014 also included a non-cash impairment charge of $874,000 and $1,936,000, respectively in connection with our review of broadcast licenses during the fourth quarter of each year (see Note 2 in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements).$1,406,000 from 2016. The increase in corporate expenses is due to an increase in key man life insurance of $278,000, an increase of $212,000 in compensations costs and an increase in non-cash compensation related to the amortization of restricted stock grants of $829,000$179,000. In 2016, we had other operating income of $1,351,000 due to the gain of $1,415,000 received from the sale of a tower in Norfolk, Virginia.

Income from continuing operations, net of tax for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $22,246,000 compared to $12,910,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, an increase of $9,336,000 or 72.3%. The increase in income from continuing operations, net of tax is primarily due to the income tax benefit of approximately $11.5 million for the year due to a decrease in the deferred tax rate for federal income tax from 35% to 21% as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act partially offset by the decrease of operating income, described above, and an increase in consulting feesinterest expense of $293,000. Other operating expenses during 2015 included the loss of $400,000 incurred from the donation of WBOP-FM$159,000 due to Liberty University, Inc., as discussedan increase in our interest rates. See Note 97 of the financial statements. During 2014, otherstatements for more information on the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax for the period ended August 31, 2017 was $32,471,000 compared to $5,276,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 an increase of $27,195,000. The increase was a direct result of the pretax gain on the disposal of the operations of $50,842,000, a decrease in station operating expense of $4,986,000 or 33.8%, partially offset by a decrease in net operating revenue of $9,398,000 or 39.8% and an increase in income tax expense of $1,210,000 related$19,173,000 primarily attributable to the gain on the sale of fourthe television stations. For the period ended August 31, 2017, net operating revenue of our information networks (Michigan Radio Network, Michigan Farm Network, Minnesota News Networktelevision stations was $14,238,000 compared with $23,636,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $9,398,000 or 39.8% primarily due to only operating the television stations for eight months in 2017 and Minnesota Farm Network), as discusseda decrease in Note 9gross political revenue in our Joplin, Missouri market. Station operating expense in the television stations for the period ended August 31, 2017 was $9,757,000, compared with $14,743,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $4,986,000 or 33.8%. The decrease is primarily due to only operating the financial statements.television stations for the eight months in 2017 compared to the whole year in 2016.

 

We generated net income of $13,414,000$54,717,000 ($2.299.27 per share on a fully diluted basis) during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $18,186,000 ($3.09 per share on a fully diluted basis) for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared with $14,904,000 ($2.55 per share on2016, an increase of $36,531,000. This is a fully diluted basis) fordirect result of the year ended December 31, 2014, a decreaseincrease of $1,490,000 or 10%. In 2015 we had a decrease$27,195,000 in operatingincome from discontinued operations, net of tax and the increase in income from continuing operations, net of $1,865,000, as described above, and $557,000 related to the write-offtax of debt issuance costs during 2015. These were partially offset by a decrease in income tax expense of $410,000, a decrease in interest expense of $176,000 driven by a decrease in average debt outstanding and an increase in other income of $346,000 primarily attributable to a gain recognized from insurance proceeds related to lightning damage to two of our transmitters.

Radio Segment

For the year ended December 31, 2015, net operating revenue of the radio segment was $111,792,000 compared with $113,627,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of $1,835,000 or 1.6%. During 2015, we had a decline in net revenue generated by radio stations that we owned or operated for the comparable period in 2014 of $1,359,000 and a decrease in net operating revenue of approximately $476,000 attributable to stations that we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period. The decrease in same station revenue was primarily attributable to the decrease in gross political revenue of $1,731,000, partially offset by an increase in gross interactive revenue of $621,000 and an increase in gross non-spot revenue of $389,000. The decrease in gross political revenue was due to a lower number of congressional, senatorial, gubernatorial and local elections in most of our markets during 2015. Gross interactive revenue increased primarily due to increased targeted display advertising sales in most of our radio markets. We had increases in gross non-spot revenue at our Manchester, New Hampshire and Milwaukee, Wisconsin markets. Of the decrease in revenue attributable to stations we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period $2,398,000 was attributable to the radio information networks which we sold in 2014 and therefore had no revenue in 2015, offset by a $1,922,000 increase in revenue attributable to stations we acquired in 2015.

Station operating expense for the radio segment was $83,188,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared with $85,167,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of $1,979,000 or 2.3%. The overall decrease was attributable to a decrease of $1,484,000 for those stations we owned or operated for the entire comparable period and a decrease of $495,000 attributable to stations that we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period. The decrease in same station is primarily a result of a decrease in licensing agreements of $1,434,000. Of the decrease in station operating expense attributable to stations we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period $2,258,000 was attributable to the radio information networks which we sold in 2014 and therefore had no expenses in 2015, offset by a $1,763,000 increase in station operating expense attributable to stations we acquired in 2015.

Operating income for the radio segment decreased $503,000 or 1.8% to $27,231,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, from $27,734,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was a result of the decrease in net operating revenue offset by the decrease in station operating expense, described above, combined with an increase in other operating expense of $1,709,000. Operating income for 2015 and 2014 also included a non-cash impairment charge of $874,000 and $1,936,000, respectively in connection with our review of broadcast licenses during the fourth quarter of each year (see Note 2 in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements). Other operating expenses during 2015 included the loss of $400,000 incurred from the donation of WBOP-FM to Liberty University, Inc., as discussed in Note 9 of the financial statements. During 2014, other operating income of $1,210,000 related to the gain on the sale of four of our information networks (Michigan Radio Network, Michigan Farm Network, Minnesota News Network and Minnesota Farm Network), as discussed in Note 9 of the financial statements.

Television Segment

For the year ended December 31, 2015, net operating revenue of our television segment was $21,064,000 compared with $20,371,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of $693,000 or 3.4%. The increase in net operating revenue was due to increases in gross retransmission revenue and gross local revenue of $1,616,000 and $377,000, respectively and a decrease in agency commission of $198,000 from 2014. The increase in gross retransmission revenue was due to increases in both of our television markets during 2015. Gross local revenue increased due to an increase at our Victoria, Texas market. These improvements to revenue were offset by decreases in gross political revenue, and gross national revenue of $1,144,000, and $361,000, respectively, from 2014. The decrease in gross political revenue was due to a lower number of congressional, senatorial, gubernatorial and local elections in both of our markets. The decrease in gross national revenue was primarily attributable to declines in our Victoria, Texas market.$9,336,000. 

 

 38

Station operating expense in the television segment for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $14,080,000, compared with $13,257,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of $823,000 or 6.2%. The increase in station operating expense was due to increased retransmission fees of $257,000, an increase in compensation related expenses of $267,000 and an increase in advertising and promotion expenses of $68,000. The retransmission cost increases are a direct result of increased revenue in 2015.

Operating income in the television segment for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $6,952,000 compared with $7,114,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $162,000 or 2.3%. The decrease was a result of the increase in station operating expenses, partially offset by an increase in net operating revenue, described in detail above, combined with an increase in other operating expenses of $32,000 related to the loss on the disposal of fixed assets.

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013

Consolidated

For the year ended December 31, 2014, consolidated net operating revenue was $133,998,000 compared with $129,478,000 for year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $4,520,000 or 3.5%.   Gross political revenue, and gross local revenue increased $3,896,000, and $948,000, respectively, from 2013. The increase in gross political revenue was due to a number of congressional, senatorial, gubernatorial and local elections in most of our markets. The increase in local revenue was primarily attributable to improvements in our Asheville, NC, Bellingham, WA, Ithaca, NY and Milwaukee, WI markets, partially offset by a decline in gross local revenue in our Manchester, NH market. Gross interactive revenue decreased $427,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to 2013, primarily in our Milwaukee, WI market.

Station operating expense was $98,424,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared with $92,977,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $5,447,000 or 6%. The increase was primarily attributable to license agreements entered into during the 3rd and 4th quarter of 2014 to license historic Nielsen data in selected markets. Additionally in 2014, we had increases in health insurance, sales commissions, programming salaries and property and casualty insurance of $510,000, $346,000, $288,000 and $153,000, respectively.

Operating income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $25,947,000 compared to $26,296,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $349,000, or 1.3%. The decrease was primarily a result of the increase in station operating expense, described above, combined with a $729,000, or 9% increase in corporate general and administrative expense, offset by an increase in net operating revenue, described above and other operating income of $1,210,000 in 2014 related to the gain on the sale of four of our information networks (Michigan Radio Network, Michigan Farm Network, Minnesota News Network and Minnesota Farm Network). Operating income for 2014 and 2013 also included a non-cash impairment charge of $1,936,000 and $2,033,000, respectively in connection with our review of broadcast licenses during the fourth quarter of each year (see Note 2 in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements).

We recognized income from discontinued operations of $223,000 net of tax from the sale of our Greenville, Mississippi TV station in January 2013. Please refer to Note 3 – Discontinued Operations, in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for more information on our discontinued operations.

We generated net income of $14,904,000 ($2.55 per share on a fully diluted basis) for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared with $15,273,000 ($2.64 per share on a fully diluted basis) for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $369,000 or 2%. In 2014 we had a decrease in operating income from continuing operations of $349,000, as described above, and an increase in our tax expense of $58,000 for 2014. These were partially offset by a decrease in interest expense of $241,000 and increase in other income of $35,000. The decrease in interest expense was attributable to a decrease in average debt outstanding.

Radio Segment

For the year ended December 31, 2014, net operating revenue of the radio segment was $113,627,000 compared with $109,818,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $3,809,000 or 4%. Gross political revenue, and gross local revenue increased $2,967,000, and $1,220,000, respectively, from 2013. The increase in gross political revenue was due to a number of congressional, senatorial, gubernatorial and local elections in most of our markets during 2014. The increase in local revenue was primarily attributable to improvements in our Asheville, NC, Bellingham, WA, Ithaca, NY and Milwaukee, WI markets, partially offset by a decline in gross local revenue in our Manchester, NH market. Gross interactive revenue decreased $427,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to 2013, primarily in our Milwaukee, WI market.

Station operating expense for the radio segment was $85,167,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared with $79,933,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $5,234,000 or 7%. The increase was primarily attributable to license agreements entered into during the 3rdand 4th quarter of 2014 to license historic Nielsen data in selected markets. Additionally in 2014, we had increases in health insurance, sales commissions, programming salaries and property and casualty insurance of $402,000, $310,000, $289,000 and $127,000, respectively.

39

Operating income for the radio segment decreased $118,000 or less than 1% to $27,734,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, from $27,852,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease was primarily a result of the increase in station operating expense partially offset by the increase in net operating revenue, described above and other operating income of $1,210,000 in 2014 related to the gain on the sale of four of our information networks (Michigan Radio Network, Michigan Farm Network, Minnesota News Network and Minnesota Farm Network). Operating income for 2014 and 2013 also included a non-cash impairment charge of $1,936,000 and $2,033,000, respectively in connection with our review of broadcast licenses during the fourth quarter of each year (see Note 2 in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements). 

Television Segment

For the year ended December 31, 2014, net operating revenue of our television segment was $20,371,000 compared with $19,660,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $711,000 or 4%. The increase is primarily attributable to increases of $929,000 in gross political revenue and $238,000 in gross retransmission revenue partially offset by decreases in gross local revenue of $272,000 and $99,000 in gross national revenue. The increase in gross political revenue was due to a number of congressional, senatorial, gubernatorial and local elections in most of our markets during 2014. The decrease in gross local revenue was primarily attributable to our Victoria, TX market. The decrease in gross national revenue was due to a decrease in our Joplin, MO market offset by an increase in our Victoria, TX market.

Station operating expense in the television segment for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $13,257,000, compared with $13,044,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $213,000 or 2%. The increase in station operating expense was due to increased retransmission fees of $140,000 and an increase in health insurance of $108,000. The retransmission cost increases are a direct result of increased revenue in 2014.

Operating income in the television segment for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $7,114,000 compared with $6,616,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $498,000 or 8%. The increase was a result of the improvement in net operating revenue partially offset by an increase in station operating expense, described in detail above.

40 

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Debt Arrangements and Debt Service Requirements

 

On August 18, 2015, we entered into a new credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a group of banks.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., The Huntington National Bank, Citizens Bank, National Association and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. In connection with the execution of the Credit Facility, the credit agreement in place at June 30, 2015 (the “Old Credit Agreement”) was terminated, and all outstanding amounts were paid in full. The Credit Facility consists of a $100 million five-year revolving facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and matures on August 18, 2020. On June 27, 2018, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to its Credit Facility, dated August 18, 2015, and amended on September 1, 2017, extending the revolving credit maturity date under the Credit Agreement for five years after the date of the amendment to June 27, 2023.

 

We have pledged substantially all of our assets (excluding our FCC licenses and certain other assets) in support of the Credit Facility and each of our subsidiaries has guaranteed the Credit Facility and has pledged substantially all of their assets (excluding their FCC licenses and certain other assets) in support of the Credit Facility.

 

The proceeds from the Credit Facility were used to repay all amounts outstanding on our Old Credit Agreement and pay transactional fees. The unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility is available for general corporate purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures, permitted acquisitions and related transaction expenses and permitted stock buybacks. We wrote-off unamortized debt issuance costs relating to the Old Credit Agreement of approximately $557 thousand, pre-tax, due to entering into this new credit facility during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

Approximately $266 thousand$266,000 of debt issuance costs related to the Credit Facility were capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the Credit Facility. These deferred debt issuance costs are included in other assets, net in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. As a result of the Second Amendment, the Company incurred an additional $120,000 of transaction fees related to the Credit Facility that were capitalized. The cumulative transaction fees are being amortized over the remaining life of the Credit Facility.

 

Interest rates under the Credit Facility are payable, at our option, at alternatives equal to LIBOR (0.25%(2.4375% at December 31, 2015)2018), plus 1% to 2% or the base rate plus 0% to 1%. The spread over LIBOR and the base rate vary from time to time, depending upon our financial leverage. Letter of credit issued under the Credit Facility will be subject to a participation fee (which is equal to the interest rates applicable to Eurocurrency Loans, as defined in the Credit Agreement) payable to each of the Lenders and a fronting fee equal to 0.25% per annum payable to the issuing bank. We also pay quarterly commitment fees of 0.2% to 0.3% per annum on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility.

 

The Credit Facility contains a number of financial covenants (all of which we were in compliance with at December 31, 2015)2018) which, among other things, require us to maintain specified financial ratios and impose certain limitations on us with respect to investments, additional indebtedness, dividends, distributions, guarantees, liens and encumbrances.

 

We had approximately $65$80 million of unused borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility at December 31, 2015.2018.

 

Our OldOn February 4, 2019, the Company used $5,000,000 from funds generated by operations to voluntarily pay down a portion of its Revolving Credit Agreement consistedFacility and it is presented in current portion of a $30 million term loan and a $90 million revolving loan originally scheduled to mature on May 31, 2018. Our indebtedness under the Old Credit Agreement was secured by a first priority lien on substantially all oflong-term debt in our assets and of our subsidiaries, by a pledge of our subsidiaries’ stock and by a guarantee of our subsidiaries. The Old Credit Agreement was used for general corporate purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures, permitted acquisitions and related transaction expenses and permitted stock buybacks.

Interest rates under the Old Credit Agreement were payable, at our option, at alternatives equal to LIBOR (0.16925%balance sheet at December 31, 2014), plus 1.25%2018.

On September 4, 2018, the Company used $5,000,000 from funds generated by operations to 2.25% or the base rate plus 0.25% to 1.25%. The spread over LIBOR and the base rate varied from time to time, depending upon our financial leverage. We also paid quarterly commitment fees of 0.25% to 0.35% per annum on the unusedpay down a portion of theits Revolving Credit Facility under the Old Credit Agreement.Facility.

 

In 2003, we entered into anOn October 5, 2017 and November 3, 2017, the Company used $5,287,000 and $5,000,000, respectively, of the proceeds from the Television Sale to pay down a portion of its Revolving Credit Facility.

The loan agreement of understanding with Surtsey Media, LLC (“Surtsey Media”), a wholly-owned subsidiaryapproximately $1.1 million of Surtsey Productions, Inc., whereby we have guaranteed up to $1,250,000 of thesecured debt incurred in closing the acquisition of a construction permit for KFJX-TV station in Pittsburg, Kansas, a full power Fox affiliate serving Joplin, Missouri. At December 31, 2015, there was $1,078,000 of debt outstanding under this agreement. The loan agreement was amended in April 20142017 to extend the due date of the loan for three years to mature on May 1, 2017. We do not have any recourse provision in connection with our guarantee that would enable us to recover any amounts paid under2020. Our affiliate repaid this loan when the guarantee. As a result, at December 31, 2015, we have recorded $1,078,000 in debt and $1,000,000 in intangible assets, primarily broadcast licenses. In consideration for the guarantee, Surtsey Media entered into various agreements with us relating to the stations.television stations were sold on September 1, 2017.

 

 4139 

 

 

Sources and Uses of Cash

 

During the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, we had net cash flows from operating activities from continuing operations of $28,535,000, $25,416,000$25,559,000, $23,912,000 and $26,712,000,$21,828,000, respectively. We believe that cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet quarterly debt service requirements for interest and scheduled payments of principal under the Credit Facility. However, if such cash flow is not sufficient, we may be required to sell additional equity securities, refinance our obligations or dispose of one or more of our properties in order to make such scheduled payments. There can be no assurance that we would be able to effect any such transactions on favorable terms, if at all.

 

In March 2013, our board of directors authorized an increase to our Stock Buy-Back Program (the “Buy-Back Program”) to allow us to purchase up to $75.8 million of our Class A Common Stock. From its inception in 1998 through December 31, 2015,2018, we have repurchased two2.1 million shares of our Class A Common Stock for $50.8$55.3 million. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, approximately 13,00036,000 shares were repurchased for $1.3 million under our stock buy-back program and 18,000 shares were retained for payment of withholding taxes for $563,000$667,000 related to the vesting of restricted stock and approximately 116,000 shares were purchased in connection with the exercise of stock options of $4,163,000.stock.

 

Our capital expenditures, exclusive of acquisitions, for the year ended December 31, 20152018 were $5,543,000$5,922,000 ($5,524,0006,246,000 in 2014).2017) for continuing operations and $0 and $335,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, for discontinued operations. We anticipate capital expenditures in 20162019 to be approximately $5.0 million to $5.5 million, which we expect to finance through funds generated from operations.

 

On March 25, 2015,February 28, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.20$0.30 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling $1.2approximately $1.8 million, was paid on April 17, 2015March 30, 2018 to shareholders of record on April 6, 2015March 12, 2018 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

 

On June 10, 2015,May 15, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular cash dividend of $0.20$0.30 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling $1.2approximately $1.8 million, was paid on July 10, 2015June 22, 2018 to shareholders of record on June 22, 2015May 31, 2018 and fundfunded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

 

On September 2, 2015,August 14, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular cash dividend of $0.20$0.30 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling $1.2approximately $1.8 million was paid on October 2, 2015September 14, 2018 to shareholders of record on September 14, 2015August 31, 2018 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

 

On November 17, 201528, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.25$0.30 per share and a special cash dividend of $0.25 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock.shares. This dividend totaling $2.9approximately $3.3 million was paid on December 11, 2015January 4, 2019 to shareholders of record on November 30, 2015.December 10, 2018 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

 

On March 2, 2016,February 26, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular cash dividend of $0.25$0.30 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling approximately $1.5$1.8 million, will be paid on April 15, 2016March 29, 2019 to shareholders of record on March 28, 2016.12, 2019.

 

On August 1, 2015,January 16, 2017, we acquired two AM and threeentered into an asset purchase agreement to purchase an FM stations and one FM translator (WSVA-AM, WHBG-AM, WQPO-FM, WWRE-FM, WMQR-FM and WQPO-HD3)radio station (WCVL) from M. Belmont VerStandig, Inc.,WUVA, Incorporated, serving the Harrisonburg,Charlottesville, Virginia market for approximately $10,131,000, which included $128,000 in transactional costs. Cash was utilized to fund the acquisition.

On September 1, 2015, we acquired two FM stations (WSIG-FM and WBOP-FM) from Gamma Broadcasting, LLC, serving the Harrisonburg, Virginia market for approximately $1,558,000, which included $92,000 in transactional costs. Cash was utilized to fund the acquisition. FCC multiple ownership rules prohibit us from owning both of these stations. In order to satisfy the multiple ownership requirements and receive FCC approval for this acquisition, we simultaneously donated WBOP-FM to Liberty University, Inc, a charitable organization. In exchange for donating WBOP-FM, including the Station, the FCC License and the Assets, we received an FM Translator W267BA, the FM Translator Assets, and the FM Translator FCC license.

On November 2, 2015,$1,650,000. Simultaneously, we entered into an agreementa TBA to acquire an FM radiobegin operating the station (WLVQ) from Wilks Broadcast - Columbus, LLC, serving the Columbus, Ohio market for $13,000,000.on February 1, 2017. We completed this acquisition on February 3, 2016. We operated this station under a LMA from November 16, 2015 through our completion of the acquisition.April 18, 2017. This acquisition was financed through funds generated from operations.

40

On May 9, 2017 we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our Joplin, Missouri and Victoria, Texas television stations for approximately $66.6 million, subject to certain adjustments, to Evening Telegram Company d/b/a Morgan Murphy Media (the “Television Sale”). The Television Sale was completed on September 1, 2017 and the Company received net proceeds of $69.5 million which included the sales price of $66.6 million, the sales of accounts receivable of approximately $3.4 million, offset by certain closing adjustments and transactional costs of $500 thousand. The Company recognized a pretax gain of $50.8 million as a result of the Television Sale in the third quarter of 2017. The gain net of tax for the Television Sale was $29.9 million. Effective September 1, 2017, the Company used $24.2 million of the proceeds from the Television Sale to finance the acquisition of radio stations in South Carolina (as described in Note 10). On October 5, 2017 and November 3, 2017, the Company used $5,287,000 and $5,000,000, respectively of the proceeds from the Television Sale to pay down a portion of its Revolving Credit Facility (as defined and described in Note 5).

On May 9, 2017, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Apex Media Corporation and Pearce Development, LLC f/k/a Apex Real Property, LLC to purchase, for approximately $23 million (subject to certain purchase price adjustments) plus the right to air certain radio commercials, substantially all the assets related to the operation of the following radio stations principally serving the South Carolina area: WCKN (FM), WMXF(FM), WXST(FM), WAVF(FM), WSPO(AM), W261DG, W257BQ, WVSC(FM), WLHH(FM), WOEZ(FM), W256CB, W293BZ. The Company closed this transaction effective September 1, 2017, simultaneously with the closing of the Television Sale using funds generated from the Television Sale.

On October 29, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase WOGK-FM, WNDT-FM, WNDD-FM and WNDN-FM, from Ocala Broadcasting Corporation. The Company closed this transaction effective December 31, 2018 using funds generated from operations of $9.84 million, which included the purchase price of $9.3 million, the purchase of $566 thousand in 2016.accounts receivable by certain closing adjustments and transactional costs of approximately $25 thousand, of which $552 thousand was paid in January 2019.

 

We continue to actively seek and explore opportunities for expansion through the acquisitions of additional broadcast properties.

 

We anticipate that any future acquisitions of radio and television stations and dividend payments will be financed through funds generated from operations, borrowings under the Credit Agreement, additional debt or equity financing, or a combination thereof. However, there can be no assurances that any such financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all.

 

 4241 

 

 

Summary Disclosures About Contractual Obligations

 

We have future cash obligations under various types of contracts, including the terms of our Credit Facility, operating leases, programming contracts, employment agreements, and other operating contracts. The following table reflects a summary of our contractual cash obligations and other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2015:2018:

 

 Payments Due By Period  Payments Due By Period 
   Less Than     More Than     Less Than       More Than 
Contractual Obligations: Total 1 Year 1 to 3 Years 4 to 5 Years 5 Years  Total  1 Year  1 to 3 Years  4 to 5 Years  5 Years 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
                      
Long-Term Debt Obligations(1) $36,365  $  $1,078  $35,287  $  $20,000  $5,000  $  $15,000  $ 
Interest Payments on Long-Term Debt(2)  3,258   728   1,398   1,132      3,232   729   1,437   1,066    
Operating Leases  8,286   1,327   2,160   1,327   3,472   7,963   1,562   2,604   1,774   2,023 
Purchase Obligations(3)  53,112   28,340   15,967   7,089   1,716   29,535   14,597   9,886   3,555   1,497 
Other Long-Term Liabilities                              
                                        
Total Contractual Cash Obligations $101,021  $30,395  $20,603  $44,835  $5,188  $60,730  $21,888  $13,927  $21,395  $3,520 

 

 (1)Under our Credit Facility, the maturity on outstanding debt of $36.4$20 million could be accelerated if we do not maintain certain covenants. Long-Term Debt Obligations include the guarantee of debt of a related party of $1,078,000. (See Notes 4 and 10Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). We voluntarily paid down $5 million in debt in February 2019.
 (2)Interest payments on the long-term debt are based on scheduled debt maturities and the interest rates are held constant over the remaining terms.
 (3)Includes $19,486,000$19,920,000 in obligations under employment agreements and contracts with on-air personalities, other employees, and our President, CEO, and Chairman, Edward K. Christian, $21,275,000 in purchase obligations under general operating agreements and contracts including but not limited to syndicated programming contracts; sports programming rights; software rights; ratings services; television advertising; and other operating expenses and $12,351,000 in obligations under asset purchase agreements to acquire broadcast properties.Christian.

 

We anticipate that the above contractual cash obligations will be financed through funds generated from operations or additional borrowings under our Credit Facility, or a combination thereof.

 

 4342 

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures and contingencies. We evaluate estimates used in preparation of our financial statements on a continual basis, including estimates related to the following:

 

Revenue Recognition:   Revenue from the sale of commercial broadcast time to advertisers is recognized when commercials are broadcast. Revenue is reported net of advertising agency commissions. Agency commissions, when applicable, are based on a stated percentage applied to gross billing. All revenue is recognized in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, Topic 13,Revenue Recognition Revised and Updated and the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605,606,Revenue Recognitionfrom Contracts with Customers.

 

Carrying Value of Accounts Receivable and Related Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:   We evaluate the collectability of our accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances where we are aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us (e.g., bankruptcy filings, credit history, etc.), we record a specific reserve for bad debts against amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount we reasonably believe will be collected. For all other customers, we recognize reserves for bad debts based on past loss history and the length of time the receivables are past due, ranging from 50% for amounts 90 days outstanding to 100% for amounts over 120 days outstanding. If our evaluations of the collectability of our accounts receivable differ from actual results, additional bad debt expense and allowances may be required. Our historical estimates have been a reliable method to estimate future allowances and our reserves have averaged approximately 2-3%2-4% of our outstanding receivables. The effect of an increase in our allowance of 1% of our outstanding receivables as of December 31, 2015,2018, from 3.0%3.9% to 4.0%4.9% or from $664,000$759,000 to $883,000$948,000 would result in a decrease in net income of $131,400,$139,000, net of taxes for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018.

 

Purchase Accounting:   We account for our acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting. The total cost of acquisitions is allocated to the underlying net assets, based on their respective estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of consideration paid over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Determining the fair values of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management’s judgment and often involves the use of significant estimates including assumptions with respect to future cash inflows and outflows, discount rates, asset lives and market multiples, among other items.

 

Broadcast Licenses and Goodwill:   As of December 31, 2015,2018, we have recorded approximately $88,106,000$95,250,000 in broadcast licenses and $2,874,000$18,839,000 in goodwill, which represents 44.5%45.9% of our total assets. In assessing the recoverability of these assets, we must conduct impairment testing and charge to operations an impairment expense only in the periods in which the carrying value of these assets is more than their fair value. We perform an annual impairment test on October 1 of each year.

 

There was no impairment of broadcast licenses in 2018.

During the fourth quarter of 2015,2017, we recognized a $874,000$1,449,000 impairment charge for broadcast licenses in certain of our radio markets primarily due to declinesa decline in available market revenue, market revenue share, profit margins and estimated long-term growth rates in our Columbus, OhioSpringfield, Illinois market. There were no impairment indicators for goodwill. Please refer to Note 23 — Broadcast Licenses, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of several key assumptions used in the fair value estimate of our broadcast licenses during our fourth quarter annual impairment test.

 

43

During the fourth quarter of 2014, we recognized a $1,936,000

There was no impairment charge forof broadcast licenses in certain of our radio markets primarily due to declines in available market revenue, market revenue share, profit margins and estimated long-term growth rates in our Columbus, Ohio market. There were no impairment indicators for goodwill. Please refer to Note 2 — Broadcast Licenses, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of several key assumptions used in the fair value estimate of our broadcast licenses during our fourth quarter annual impairment test.

During the fourth quarter of 2013, we recognized a $2,033,000 impairment charge for broadcast licenses in certain of our radio markets primarily due to declines in available market revenue, market revenue share, profit margins, and estimated long-term growth rates, combined with an increase in technical equipment costs in three of our markets, Asheville, North Carolina; Keene, New Hampshire/Brattleboro, Vermont; and Mitchell, South Dakota. Please refer to Note 2 — Broadcast Licenses, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of several key assumptions used in the fair value estimate of our broadcast licenses during our fourth quarter annual impairment test.2016.

 

We believe our estimate of the value of our broadcast licenses is a critical accounting estimate as the value is significant in relation to our total assets, and our estimate of the value uses assumptions that incorporate variables based on past experiences and judgments about future operating performance of our stations. These variables include but are not limited to: (1) the forecast growth rate of each radio and television market, including population, household income, retail sales and other expenditures that would influence advertising expenditures; (2) market share and profit margin of an average station within a market; (3) estimated capital start-up costs and losses incurred during the early years; (4) risk-adjusted discount rate; (5) the likely media competition within the market area; and (6) terminal values. Changes in our estimates of the fair value of these assets could result in material future period write-downs in the carrying value of our broadcast licenses. For illustrative purposes only, had the fair values of each of our broadcasting licenses been lower by 10% as of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company would have recorded an additional broadcast license impairment of approximately $1.5$1.3 million; had the fair values of each of our broadcasting licenses been lower by 20% as of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company would have recorded an additional broadcast license impairment of approximately $4.0$4.8 million; and had the fair value of our broadcasting licenses been lower by 30% as of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company would have recorded an additional broadcast license impairment of approximately $7.9$9.6 million.

44

  

Stock Based Compensation:   We use a Black-Scholes valuation model to estimate the fair value of stock option awards. Under the fair value method, stock based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of share-based awards at grant date requires assumptions and judgments about expected volatility and forfeiture rates, among other factors. If actual results differ significantly from these assumptions, then stock based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that previously recorded.

 

The fair value of restricted stock awards is determined based on the closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the grant date and is adjusted at each reporting date based on the amount of shares ultimately expected to vest. We had no stock options outstanding at December 31, 2018 or 2017.

 

Litigation and Contingencies:   On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our exposure related to litigation and contingencies and record a liability when available information indicates that a liability is probable and estimable. We also disclose significant matters that are reasonably possible to result in a loss or are probable but not estimable.

 

Market Risk and Risk Management Policies

 

Our earnings are affected by changes in short-term interest rates as a result of our long-term debt arrangements. If market interest rates averaged 1% more in 20152018 than they did during 2015,2018, our interest expense would increase, and income before taxes would decrease by $351,000.$234,000. These amounts are determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing cost. This analysis does not consider the effects of the reduced level of overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of such magnitude, management would likely take actions to further mitigate its exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no changes in our financial structure.

 

Inflation

 

The impact of inflation on our operations has not been significant to date. There can be no assurance that a high rate of inflation in the future would not have an adverse effect on our operations.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In February 2016,Recent accounting pronouncements are described in Note 1 to the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02,“Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”)¸which requires that all leases with a term of more than one year, covering leased assets such as real estate, broadcasting towers and equipment, be reflected on the balance sheet as assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by these leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of this new standard on our consolidatedaccompanying financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17,“Income Taxes (Topic 740), Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”), which requires companies to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on the balance sheet instead of separating deferred taxes into current and noncurrent amounts. ASU 2015-17 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of this new standard on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-16,“Business Combinations (Topic 805), Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement Period Adjustments”,(“ASU 2015-16”), which eliminates the requirement that an acquirer in a business combination account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead an acquirer will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment, including the effect on earnings of any amounts it would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-05, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40), Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement ” (“ASU 2015-05”), with new guidance on whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license and the accounting for such an arrangement. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the software license element of the arrangement should be accounted for consistently with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the agreement should be accounted for as a service contract. ASU 2015-05 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of this new standard on our consolidated financial statements. 

 

 4544 

 

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, “Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs ” (“ASU 2015-03”), and in August 2015 the FAS issued ASU 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements. These ASUs require debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt consistent with debt discounts. The presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with line of credit, may be presented as an asset and amortized ratably over the term of the line of credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are outstanding borrowings on the arrangement. We currently present deferred financing costs related to our line of credit within Other assets.  ASU 2015-03 and ASU 2015-15 are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810), Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis ” (“ASU 2015-02”) , which amends the consolidation requirements in ASC 810, primarily related to limited partnerships and VIEs. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of this new standard on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01, “Income Statement-Extraordinary and Unusual Items ” (“ASU 2015-01”), which simplifies income statement presentation by eliminating the need to determine whether to classify an item as an extraordinary item. ASU 2015-01 is effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU 2014-15”), which requires management to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and provide related disclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”), which provides guidance for the recognition, measurement and disclosure of revenue resulting from contracts with customers and will supersede virtually all of the current revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. ASU 2014-09 is effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date" (“ASU 2015-14”), which delayed the effective date by one year. As a result, the standard is effective for us for fiscal and interim periods beginning January 1, 2018 and allows for full retrospective or modified retrospective methods of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

 

Information appearing under the caption “Market Risk and Risk Management Policies” in Item 7 is hereby incorporated by reference.

 

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

The financial statements attached hereto are filed as part of this annual report.

 

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.

 

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting were effective to ensure that material information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act to be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20152018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

46

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework as set forth inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Based on our evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015.2018. Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152018 has been audited by UHY LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which appears below.

 

 4745 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Saga Communications, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

We have audited Saga Communications, Inc.’s (the Company’s) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2018, based on criteria established in internalInternal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria)(COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of Saga Communications, Inc.’s as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018 and the related notes and financial statement schedule, and our report dated March 15, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, andrisk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the companyCompany are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’sCompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, Saga Communications, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Saga Communications, Inc., as of December 31, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015 of Saga Communications, Inc. and our report dated March 14, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ UHY LLP

Farmington Hills, Michigan

March 14, 2016

/s/ UHY LLP
Farmington Hills, Michigan
March 15, 2019

 

 4846 

 

 

Item 9B.  Other Information

 

None.

 

PART III

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our Proxy Statement for the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year. See also Item 1. Business — Executive Officers.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

 

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our Proxy Statement for the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year.

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our Proxy Statement for the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year. In addition, the information contained in the “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan Information” subheading under Item 5 of this report is incorporated by reference herein.

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our Proxy Statement for the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year.

 

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our Proxy Statement for the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year.

 

 4947 

 

 

PART IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)1.  Financial Statements

 

The following consolidated financial statements attached hereto are filed as part of this annual report:

  

ReportsReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmsFirm 5149
Consolidated Financial Statements:  
—  Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 5350
—  Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 5451
—  Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 5552
—  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 5653
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 5754

 

2.Financial Statement Schedules

 

Schedule II Valuation and qualifying accountsQualifying Accounts is disclosed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements attached hereto and filed as part of this annual report. All other schedules for which provision are made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

 

3.Exhibits

 

The Exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Exhibit Index, which is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 5048 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Saga Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015,2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended.These financial statements are the responsibilityeach of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosuresthree years in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessingperiod ended December 31, 2018, and the accounting principles usedrelated notes and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Schedule II, Valuation and Qualifying Accounts listed in the index at item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Saga Communications, Inc. at December 31, 2015,2018 and 2017, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the yearthree years in the period ended December 31, 2015,2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), Saga Communications, Inc.’sthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated March 14, 201615, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

/s/ UHY LLPBasis for Opinion

 

Farmington Hills, Michigan

March 14, 2016

51

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Saga Communications, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Saga Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

/s/ UHY LLP

In our opinion,

We have served as the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Saga Communications, Inc. at December 31, 2014, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.Company’s auditor since 2015.

 

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the company elected to adopt an amendment to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification resulting from Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, effective October 1, 2014. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Detroit,Farmington Hills, Michigan

March 13, 201515, 2019

 

 5249 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except par value)

 

 December 31,  December 31, 
 2015  2014  2018  2017 
          
ASSETS                
Current assets:                
Cash and cash equivalents $21,614  $17,907  $44,729  $53,030 
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $664 ($395 in 2014)  21,300   20,661 
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $759 ($727 in 2017)  19,984   19,307 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,608   2,957   2,556   2,517 
Barter transactions  1,266   1,217   1,326   1,320 
Deferred income taxes  1,107   845 
Total current assets  47,895   43,587   68,595   76,174 
Net property and equipment  58,131   55,187   59,103   56,235 
Other assets:                
Broadcast licenses, net  88,106   86,762   95,250   93,259 
Goodwill  2,874   326   18,839   15,558 
Other intangibles, deferred costs and investments, net of accumulated amortization of $11,336 ($11,796 in 2014)  7,565   6,182 
Other intangibles, deferred costs and investments, net of accumulated amortization of $13,682 ($12,588 in 2017)  6,690   7,543 
 $204,571  $192,044  $248,477  $248,769 
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
Current liabilities:                
Accounts payable $2,799  $2,133  $2,613  $2,206 
Accrued expenses:                
Payroll and payroll taxes  7,401   6,788   7,899   7,836 
Dividend payable  3,274   6,529 
Other  2,792   2,756   3,072   3,243 
Barter transactions  1,346   1,356   1,307   1,091 
Current portion of long-term debt  5,000    
Total current liabilities  14,338   13,033   23,165   20,905 
Deferred income taxes  27,688   23,786   23,732   21,072 
Long-term debt  36,365   36,078   15,000   25,000 
Broadcast program rights  780   805 
Other liabilities  2,584   3,097   1,581   2,327 
Liabilities of discontinued operations      
Total liabilities  81,755   76,799   63,478   69,304 
Commitments and contingencies              
Stockholders’ equity:                
Preferred stock, 1,500 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding            
Common stock:                
Class A common stock, $.01 par value, 35,000 shares authorized, 6,603 issued (6,446 in 2014)  66   64 
Class B common stock, $.01 par value, 3,500 shares authorized, 865 issued and outstanding (843 in 2014)  8   8 
Class A common stock, $.01 par value, 35,000 shares authorized, 6,732 issued (6,694 in 2017)  67   67 
Class B common stock, $.01 par value, 3,500 shares authorized, 923 issued and outstanding (898 in 2017)  9   9 
Additional paid-in capital  57,510   52,496   64,795   62,675 
Retained earnings  98,180   91,178   156,689   151,608 
Treasury stock (1,612 shares in 2015 and 1,489 in 2014, at cost)  (32,948)  (28,501)
Treasury stock (1,703 shares in 2018 and 1,656 in 2017, at cost)  (36,561)  (34,894)
Total stockholders’ equity  122,816   115,245   184,999   179,465 
 $204,571  $192,044  $248,477  $248,769 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

 5350 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Consolidated Statements of Income

 

 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
 2015  2014  2013  2018  2017  2016 
 (In thousands, except per share data)  (In thousands, except per share data) 
              
Net operating revenue $132,856  $133,998  $129,478  $124,829   118,149   118,955 
Operating expenses (income):                        
Station operating expense  97,268   98,424   92,977   93,727   87,759   86,799 
Corporate general and administrative  10,091   8,901   8,172   11,359   11,657   10,980 
Other operating expense (income), net  541   (1,210)     61   55   (1,351)
Impairment of intangible assets  874   1,936   2,033      1,449    
  108,774   108,051   103,182   105,147   100,920   96,428 
Operating income from continuing operations  24,082   25,947   26,296   19,682   17,229   22,527 
Other (income) expenses:                        
Interest expense  888   1,064   1,305   946   903   744 
Write-off debt issuance costs  557      55 
Interest income  (631)      
Other income  (417)  (71)  (106)  (23)      
Income from continuing operations before income tax  23,054   24,954   25,042 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes  19,390   16,326   21,783 
Income tax provision:                        
Current  6,000   6,665   7,187   3,040   2,290   6,626 
Deferred  3,640   3,385   2,805   2,660   (8,210)  2,247 
  9,640   10,050   9,992   5,700   (5,920)  8,873 
Income from continuing operations, net of income tax  13,414   14,904   15,050 
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax        223 
Income from continuing operations, net of tax  13,690   22,246   12,910 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax     32,471   5,276 
Net income $13,414  $14,904  $15,273  $13,690   54,717   18,186 
Basic earnings per share            
            
Basic earnings per share:            
From continuing operations $2.31  $2.57  $2.62  $2.30  $3.77  $2.20 
From discontinued operations        .04      5.50   0.90 
Basic earnings per share $2.31  $2.57  $2.66  $2.30  $9.27  $3.10 
Weighted average common shares  5,706   5,700   5,681   5,829   5,803   5,761 
Diluted earnings per share            
            
Diluted earnings per share:            
From continuing operations $2.29  $2.55  $2.60  $2.30  $3.77  $2.19 
From discontinued operations        .04      5.50   0.90 
Diluted earnings per share $2.29  $2.55  $2.64  $2.30  $9.27  $3.09 
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares  5,740   5,753   5,745   5,829   5,807   5,771 
Dividends declared per share $1.10  $1.80  $1.80  $1.45  $2.00  $1.30 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

 5451 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

Years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016

 

 Class A Class B Additional         Class A Class B Additional       Total 
 Common Stock  Common Stock  Paid-In  Retained  Treasury  Stockholders’  Common Stock  Common Stock  Paid-In  Retained  Treasury  Stockholders’ 
 Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Earnings  Stock  Equity  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Earnings  Stock  Equity 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Balance at January 1, 2013  6,369  $64   797  $8  $51,061  $81,746  $(28,670) $104,209 
Balance at January 1, 2016  6,603  $66   865  $8  $57,510  $98,180  $(32,948) $122,816 
Net income                      15,273       15,273                       18,186       18,186 
Conversion of shares from Class B to Class A  1       (1)                     12      (12)               
Issuance of restricted stock  30       20                      23      25                
Net proceeds from exercised options  9               275           275 
Dividends declared per common share                      (10,326)      (10,326)                 (7,633)     (7,633)
Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards                  135           135               2,101         2,101 
Purchase of shares held in treasury                          (95)  (95)                    (746)  (746)
401(k) plan contribution                  (15)      245   230               (54)     312   258 
Balance at December 31, 2013  6,409  $64   816  $8  $51,456  $86,693  $(28,520) $109,701 
Net income                      14,904       14,904 
Conversion of shares from Class B to Class A  3       (3)                   
Issuance of restricted stock  27       30                    
Net proceeds from exercised options  7               244           244 
Dividends declared per common share                      (10,419)      (10,419)
Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards                  826           826 
Purchase of shares held in treasury                          (254)  (254)
401(k) plan contribution                  (30)      273   243 
Balance at December 31, 2014  6,446  $64   843  $8  $52,496  $91,178  $(28,501) $115,245 
Balance at December 31, 2016  6,638  $66   878  $8  $59,557  $108,733  $(33,382) $134,982 
Net income                      13,414       13,414                       54,717       54,717 
Conversion of shares from Class B to Class A  40   1   (40)  (1)                 17      (17)                
Issuance of restricted stock  26       30                      19      29   1   (1)         
Forfeiture of restricted stock  (2)                             (1)                        
Net proceeds from exercised options  93   1   32   1   3,393       (4,162)  (767)  21   1   8      826      (826)  1 
Dividends declared per common share                      (6,412)      (6,412)                  (11,842)      (11,842)
Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards                  1,655           1,655               2,279         2,279 
Purchase of shares held in treasury                          (563)  (563)                     (946)  (946)
401(k) plan contribution                  (34)      278   244               14      260   274 
Balance at December 31, 2015  6,603  $66   865  $8  $57,510  $98,180  $(32,948) $122,816 
Balance at December 31, 2017  6,694  $67   898  $9  $62,675  $151,608  $(34,894) $179,465 
Net income                      13,690       13,690 
Conversion of shares from Class B to Class A  12      (12)               
Issuance of restricted stock  27      37                
Forfeiture of restricted stock  (1)                        
Dividends declared per common share                  (8,609)      (8,609)
Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards              2,201           2,201 
Purchase of shares held in treasury                      (2,000)  (2,000)
401(k) plan contribution              (81)      333   252 
Balance at December 31, 2018  6,732  $67   923  $9  $64,795  $156,689  $(36,561) $184,999 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

 5552 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
 2015  2014  2013  2018  2017  2016 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
              
Cash flows from operating activities:                        
Net income $13,414  $14,904  $15,273  $13,690  $54,717  $18,186 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax        223 
Income from continuing operations  13,414   14,904   15,050 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:                        
Income from discontinued operations     (32,471)  (5,276)
Depreciation and amortization  6,824   6,702   6,768   6,786   6,251   5,876 
Deferred income taxes  3,640   3,385   2,805   2,660   (8,210)  2,247 
Impairment of intangible assets  874   1,936   2,033      1,449    
Broadcast program rights amortization  637   637   637 
Amortization of deferred costs  131   187   204   51   53   53 
Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards  1,655   826   135   2,201   2,279   2,101 
(Gain) loss on sale of assets  541   (1,281)  (126)
Other (gains) losses, net        20 
Gain on insurance claim  (417)      
Loss (gain) on sale of assets  61   55   (1,351)
(Gain) on insurance claim  (23)      
Barter revenue, net  (113)  (208)  (11)  107   (251)  (254)
Deferred and other compensation  (41)  (129)  19   62   (337)  14 
Write-off of debt issuance costs  557      55 
Income tax expense (benefit) on exercise of options     10   (13)
Changes in assets and liabilities:                        
Decrease (increase) in receivables and prepaid expenses  233   (1,521)  160 
Payments for broadcast program rights  (635)  (627)  (628)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities  1,235   595   (396)
Increase in receivables and prepaid expenses  (157)  (434)  (885)
Increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities  121   811   1,117 
Total adjustments  15,121   10,512   11,662   11,869   (30,805)  3,642 
Net cash provided by operating activities  28,535   25,416   26,712 
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities  25,559   23,912   21,828 
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operating activities     (18,538)  7,478 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  25,559   5,374   29,306 
Cash flows from investing activities:                        
Acquisition of property and equipment  (5,543)  (5,524)  (5,152)  (5,922)  (6,246)  (3,967)
Proceeds from sale and disposal of assets  168   90   792   318   419   1,676 
Proceeds from insurance claim  777       
Proceeds from sale of networks     1,640    
Proceeds from sale of television station        2,960 
Acquisition of broadcast properties  (11,842)  (903)     (9,289)  (25,856)  (12,841)
Other investing activities  (666)  (11)  (410)  17   (5)  39 
Net cash used in investing activities  (17,106)  (4,708)  (1,810)
Net cash used in continuing investing activities  (14,876)  (31,688)  (15,093)
Net cash received provided by (used in) discontinued operations investing activities     69,193   (835)
Net cash (used in) received from investing activities  (14,876)  37,505   (15,928)
Cash flows from financing activities:                        
Payments on long-term debt  (35,000)  (10,000)  (12,750)  (5,000)  (10,287)   
Proceeds from long-term debt  35,287       
Cash dividends paid  (6,412)  (10,419)  (10,326)  (11,864)  (5,313)  (7,633)
Payments for debt issuance costs  (266)     (289)  (120)      
Other financing activities  (1,331)  (10)  176 
Purchase of shares held in treasury  (2,000)  (946)  (746)
Net cash used in financing activities  (7,722)  (20,429)  (23,189)  (18,984)  (16,546)  (8,379)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  3,707   279   1,713 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (8,301)  26,333   4,999 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  17,907   17,628   15,915   53,030   26,697   21,698 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $21,614  $17,907  $17,628  $44,729  $53,030  $26,697 

 

See accompanying notes.

  

 5653 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

1.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Nature of Business

 

Saga Communications, Inc. is a broadcasting company whose business is devoted to acquiring, developing and operating broadcast properties. As of December 31, 20152018, we owned or operated ninety-nineseventy-nine FM and thirty-three AM radio stations, four television stations, and five low-power television stations serving twenty-sixtwenty-seven markets throughout the United States.

Basis of Presentation

On January 16, 2013September 1, 2017 the Company consummatedsold its Joplin, Missouri and Victoria, Texas television stations. The historical results of operations for the television stations are presented in the discontinued operations for all periods presented (see Note 4). As a four-for-three stock split of its Class A and Class B Common Stock, to shareholders of record asresult of the close of business onCompany’s television stations being reported as discontinued operations the Company only has one reportable segment at December 28, 2012. The stock split increased31, 2018 and 2017. Unless indicated otherwise, the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock from 3,659,753 shares of Class A Common Stock and 597,504 shares of Class B Common Stock to 4,879,186 and 796,672 shares, respectively.

All share and per share information in the accompanying financial statements for periods priorNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements relates to the split have been restated retroactively to reflect the stock split. The common stock and additional paid-in capital accounts reflect the retroactive capitalization of the four-for-three stock split.Company’s continuing operations.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Saga Communications, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. While we do not believe that the ultimate settlement of any amounts reported will materially affect our financial position or results of future operations, actual results may differ from estimates provided.

 

Concentration of Risk

  

Certain cash deposits with financial institutions may at times exceed FDIC insurance limits.

Our top sixfive markets when combined represented 44%41%, 43%41% and 44%43% of our net operating revenue for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

 

We sell advertising to local and national companies throughout the United States. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and generally do not require collateral. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts at a level which we believe is sufficient to cover potential credit losses.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and time deposits with original maturities of three months or less. We did not have any time deposits at December 31, 20152018 and 2014.2017.

 

Financial Instruments

 

Our financial instruments are comprised of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The carrying value of long-term debt approximates fair value as it carries interest rates that either fluctuate with the euro-dollar rate, prime rate or have been reset at the prevailing market rate at December 31, 2015.2018.

 

 5754 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

A provision for doubtful accounts is recorded based on our judgment of the collectability of receivables. Amounts are written off when determined to be fully uncollectible. Delinquent accounts are based on contractual terms. The activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts during the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was as follows:

 

           Write Off of    
  Balance  Charged to  Allowance  Uncollectible  Balance at 
  at Beginning  Costs and  From  Accounts, Net of  End of 
Year Ended of Period  Expenses  Acquisitions  Recoveries  Period 
  (in thousands) 
                
December 31, 2015 $395  $339  $99  $(169) $664 
December 31, 2014 $578  $139  $  $(322) $395 
December 31, 2013 $577  $293  $  $(292) $578 
           Write Off of    
  Balance  Charged to  Allowance  Uncollectible  Balance at 
  at Beginning  Costs and  From  Accounts, Net of  End of 
Year Ended of Period  Expenses  Acquisitions  Recoveries  Period 
  (in thousands) 
                
December 31, 2018 $727  $444  $25  $(437) $759 
December 31, 2017 $518  $333  $181  $(305) $727 
December 31, 2016 $614  $195  $  $(291) $518 

 

Barter Transactions

 

Our radio and television stations trade air time for goods and services used principally for promotional, sales and other business activities. An asset and a liability are recorded at the fair market value of goods or services received. Barter revenue is recorded when commercials are broadcast, and barter expense is recorded when goods or services received are used.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are carried at cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. When property and equipment is sold or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the respective accounts and the gain or loss realized on disposition is reflected in earnings. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful life of the assets. We review our property and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of their carrying amounts to future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If the assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds its fair market value. We did not record any impairment of property and equipment during 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.2016.

 

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

 

 Estimated  December 31,  Estimated  December 31, 
 Useful Life  2015  2014  Useful Life  2018  2017 
    (In thousands)     (In thousands) 
              
Land and land improvements    $13,207  $11,026     $14,402  $13,594 
Buildings  31.5 years   34,543   33,275   31.5 years   35,812   34,905 
Towers and antennae  7-15 years   27,616   26,191   7-15 years   25,959   24,538 
Equipment  3-15 years   79,624   79,216   3-15 years   53,752   52,534 
Furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements  7-20 years   8,263   8,104   7-20 years   6,740   6,822 
Vehicles  5 years   3,821   3,790   5 years   3,555   3,463 
      167,074   161,602       140,220   135,856 
Accumulated depreciation      (108,943)  (106,415)      (81,117)  (79,621)
Net property and equipment     $58,131  $55,187      $59,103  $56,235 

 

Depreciation expense for continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $6,593,000, $6,648,000$5,692,000, $5,391,000 and $6,716,000,$5,234,000, respectively. Depreciation expense for discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $0, $445,000 and $1,387,000, respectively.

 

 5855 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

Intangible Assets

 

Intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives, which include broadcast licenses and goodwill, are not amortized and are subject to impairment tests which are conducted as of October 1 of each year, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise.

 

We have 107112 broadcast licenses serving 2627 markets, some of which are currently under renewal, while others require renewal over the period of 2016-2023.2019-2022. In determining that the Company’s broadcast licenses qualified as indefinite-lived intangible assets, management considered a variety of factors including our broadcast licenses may be renewed indefinitely at little cost; our broadcast licenses are essential to our business and we intend to renew our licenses indefinitely; we have never been denied the renewal of an FCC broadcast license nor do we believe that there will be any compelling challenge to the renewal of our broadcast licenses; and we do not believe that the technology used in broadcasting will be replaced by another technology in the foreseeable future.

 

Separable intangible assets that have finite lives are amortized over their useful lives using the straight-line method. Favorable lease agreements are amortized over the leases length, ranging from 4five to 26twenty-six years. Other intangibles are amortized over one to elevenfifteen years. Customer relationships are amortized over three years.

 

Deferred Costs

 

The costs related to the issuance of debt are capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt. As a result of the Second Amendment, the Company incurred an additional $120,000 of transaction fees related to the Credit Facility that were capitalized. The cumulative transaction fees are being amortized over the remaining life of the Credit Facility. During the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, we recognized interest expense related to the amortization of debt issuance costs of $131,000, $187,000$51,000, $53,000 and $204,000,$53,000, respectively. In 2015 we wrote-off unamortized debt issuance costs of $557,000, pre-tax, in connection with our new credit facility. In 2013 we also wrote-off unamortized debt issuance costs of $55,000, pre-tax, in connection with an amendment to our credit facility. See Note 4 – Long-Term Debt.

 

At December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 the net book value of debt issuance costs related to our line of credit was $244,000,$207,000, and $636,000,$138,000, respectively, and was presented in Otherother intangibles, deferred costs and investments in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Broadcast Program Rights

We record the capitalized costs of broadcast program rights when the license period begins and the programs are available for use. Amortization of the program rights is recorded using the straight-line method over the license period or based on the number of showings. Amortization of broadcast program rights is included in station operating expense. Unamortized broadcast program rights are classified as current or non-current based on terms of the syndication agreements and estimated usage in future years.

 

Treasury Stock

 

In March 2013, our board of directors authorized an increase in the amount committed to our Stock Buy-Back Program (the “Buy-Back Program”) from $60 million to $75.8 million. The Buy-Back Program allows us to repurchase our Class A Common Stock. As of December 31, 2015,2018, we had remaining authorization of $24.9$20.4 million for future repurchases of our Class A Common Stock.

 

Repurchases of shares of our Common Stock are recorded as Treasury stock and result in a reduction of Stockholders’ equity. During 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, we acquired 129,38453,713 shares at an average price of $36.53$37.24 per share, 6,16537,141 shares at an average price of $41.15$47.72 per share and 2,17918,612 shares at an average price of $43.98$40.06 per share, respectively.

 

 5956 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Revenue from the sale of commercial broadcast time to advertisers is recognized when commercials are broadcast. Revenue is reported net of advertising agency commissions. Agency commissions, when applicable are based on a stated percentage applied to gross billing. All revenue is recognized in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, Topic 13,Revenue Recognition Revised and Updated and The Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605,606,Revenue Recognitionfrom Contracts with Customers.

 

Time Brokerage Agreements/Local Marketing Agreements

 

We have entered into Time Brokerage Agreements (“TBA’s”TBAs”) or Local Marketing Agreements (“LMA’s”LMAs”) in certain markets. In a typical TBA/LMA, the FCC licensee of a station makes available, for a fee, blocks of air time on its station to another party that supplies programming to be broadcast during that air time and sells its own commercial advertising announcements during the time periods specified. Revenue and expenses related to TBA’s/LMA’sTBAs/LMAs are included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. Assets and liabilities related to the TBA’s/LMA’sTBAs/LMAs are included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

Advertising and Promotion Costs

 

Advertising and promotion costs are expensed as incurred. Such costs related to our continuing operations amounted to $2,804,000, $3,056,000$2,438,000, $2,441,000 and $3,225,000$2,633,000 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively. Advertising and promotion costs related to our discontinued operations amounted to $0, $240,000 and $341,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 

Income Taxes

 

DeferredThe provision for income taxes is calculated using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. Our effective tax rate is higher than the federal statutory rate as a result of the inclusion of state taxes in the income tax amount.

 

Dividends

 

On November 17, 201528, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.25$0.30 per share and a special cash dividend of $0.25 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock.shares. This dividend totaling $2.9approximately $3.3 million was paid on December 11, 2015January 4, 2019 to shareholders of record on November 30, 2015.December 10, 2018 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

 

On September 2, 2015August 14, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterlyregular cash dividend of $0.20$0.30 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling $1.2approximately $1.8 million was paid on October 2, 2015September 14, 2018 to shareholders of record on September 14, 2015.August 31, 2018 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

 

On June 10, 2015May 15, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterlyregular cash dividend of $0.20$0.30 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling $1.2approximately $1.8 million, was paid on July 10, 2015June 22, 2018 to shareholders of record on June 22, 2015.May 31, 2018 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

 

On March 25, 2015February 28, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.20$0.30 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling $1.2approximately $1.8 million, was paid on April 6, 2015March 30, 2018 to shareholders of record on April 17, 2015.

On December 3, 2014March 12, 2018 and funded by cash on the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share and a special cash dividend of $1.20 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend totaling $8.2 million was paid on December 29, 2014 to shareholders of record on December 15, 2014.

On September 23, 2014 the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend totaling $1.1 million was paid on October 17, 2014 to shareholders of record on October 3, 2014.

On June 30, 2014 the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend totaling $1.1 million was paid on July 25, 2014 to shareholders of record on July 11, 2014.

On November 21, 2013 the Company’s Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $1.80 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend totaling $10.3 million was paid on December 12, 2013 to shareholders of record on December 2, 2013.balance sheet.

 

 6057 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

On December 7, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.30 per share and a special cash dividend of $0.80 per share on its Classes A and B shares. This dividend totaling approximately $6.5 million was paid on January 5, 2018 to shareholders of record on December 18, 2017 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

On September 13, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular cash dividend of $0.30 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling approximately $1.8 million was paid on October 13, 2017 to shareholders of record on September 25, 2017 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

On May 3, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular cash dividend of $0.30 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling approximately $1.8 million, was paid on June 9, 2017 to shareholders of record on May 22, 2017 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

On March 3, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.30 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling approximately $1.8 million, was paid on April 14, 2017 to shareholders of record on March 28, 2017 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

On November 21, 2016 the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.30 per share and a special cash dividend of $0.20 per share on its Classes A and B shares. This dividend totaling $2.9 million was paid on December 23, 2016 to shareholders of record on December 5, 2016 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

On August 30, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular cash dividend of $0.30 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling $1.8 million was paid on September 30, 2016 to shareholders of record on September 14, 2016 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

On June 1, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular cash dividend of $0.25 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling $1.5 million, was paid on July 8, 2016 to shareholders of record on June 15, 2016 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

On March 2, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling $1.5 million, was paid on April 15, 2016 to shareholders of record on March 28, 2016 and funded by cash on the Company’s balance sheet.

  

Stock-Based Compensation

 

Stock-based compensation cost for stock option awards is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes valuation model and is expensed on a straight-line method over the vesting period of the options. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized net of estimated forfeitures. The fair value of restricted stock awards is determined based on the closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the grant date and is adjusted at each reporting date based on the amount of shares ultimately expected to vest. See Note 78 — Stock-Based Compensation for further details regarding the expense calculated under the fair value based method.

58

Saga Communications, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

Earnings Per Share

 

Earnings per share is calculated using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security. The Company has participating securities related to restricted stock units, granted under the Company’s Second Amended and Restated 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan, that earn dividends on an equal basis with common shares. In applying the two-class method, earnings are allocated to both common shares and participating securities.

 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

 

 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
 2015  2014  2013  2018  2017  2016 
 (In thousands, except per share data)  (In thousands, except per share data) 
              
Numerator:                        
Net income $13,414  $14,904  $15,273 
Less: Net income allocated to unvested participating securities  250   234   135 
Income from continuing operations $13,690  $22,246  $12,910 
Less: Income allocated to unvested participating securities  256   370   231 
Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders $13,434  $21,876  $12,679 
            
Income from discontinued operations $  $32,471  $5,276 
Less: Income allocated to unvested participating securities     541   94 
Income from discontinued operations available to common stockholders $  $31,930  $5,182 
            
Net income available to common stockholders $13,164  $14,670  $15,138  $13,434  $53,806  $17,861 
            
Denominator:                        
Denominator for basic earnings per share-weighted average shares  5,706   5,700   5,681   5,829   5,803   5,761 
Effect of dilutive securities:                        
Stock options  34   53   64      4   10 
Denominator for diluted earnings per share — adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversions  5,740   5,753   5,745   5,829   5,807   5,771 
            
Basic earnings per share:            
From continuing operations $2.30  $3.77  $2.20 
From discontinued operations     5.50   0.90 
Basic earnings per share $2.31  $2.57  $2.66  $2.30  $9.27  $3.10 
            
Diluted earnings per share $2.29  $2.55  $2.64             
From continuing operations $2.30  $3.77  $2.19 
From discontinued operations     5.50   0.90 
Diluted earnings per share $2.30  $9.27  $3.09 

 

The number ofThere were no stock options outstanding that had an antidilutive effect on our earnings per share calculation and therefore have been excluded from dilutive earnings per share calculation, was 0, 45,000 and 13,000 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively. The actual effect of these shares, if any, on the diluted earnings per share calculation will vary significantly depending on fluctuations in the stock price. 

 

 6159 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers”(“ASU 2014-09”), which provides guidance for the recognition, measurement and disclosure of revenue resulting from contracts with customers and will supersede virtually all of the current revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The FASB has also issued a number of updates to this standard. This amendment and all updates, which established Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606 (the “new revenue standard”) were adopted on January 1, 2018. The Company adopted the new revenue standard using the modified retrospective method. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under the new revenue standard, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under Topic 605. Impacts of the new revenue standard do not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (Topic 230): Statement of Cash Flows”(“ASU 2016-15”), which clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 also clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 was adopted on January 1, 2018 and did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – Not Yet Adopted

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)”(“ASU 2017-04”) which removes step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds it fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 will be applied prospectively and is effective for fiscal years and interim impairment tests performed in periods beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on our consolidated financial statements.

  In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”(“ASU 2016-13”), which amends guidance on reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized cost basis and available for sale debt securities. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02,“Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”)¸which requires that all leases with a term of more than one year, covering leased assets such as real estate, broadcasting towers and equipment, be reflected on the balance sheet as assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by these leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of this new standard on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015,2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17,“Income Taxes (Topic 740), Balance Sheet Classificationseveral updates to address certain practical expedients, codification improvements, and targeted improvements to the original guidance. Upon adoption, we expect to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability approximately $7 million to reflect the present value of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”), which requires companies to classify all deferred taxremaining lease payments under the existing leasing arrangements. While the recognition of such lease assets and liabilities as noncurrent on thewill impact our consolidated balance sheet, instead of separating deferred taxes into current and noncurrent amounts. ASU 2015-17 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of this new standard on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-16,“Business Combinations (Topic 805), Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement Period Adjustments”, (“ASU 2015-16”), which eliminates the requirement that an acquirer in a business combination account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead an acquirer will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment, including the effect on earnings of any amounts it would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted and arewe do not expected to haveexpect a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-05, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40), Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement” (“ASU 2015-05”), with new guidance on whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license and the accounting for such an arrangement. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the software license element of the arrangement should be accounted for consistently with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the agreement should be accounted for as a service contract. ASU 2015-05 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of this new standard on our consolidated statements of income or cash flows. We have elected to apply the modified retrospective transition approach without restatement of comparative periods financial statements. 

In April 2015,information, as permitted by the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, “Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Cost” (“ASU 2015-03”), and in August 2015 the FAS issued ASU 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements. These ASUs require debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt consistent with debt discounts. The presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with line of credit, may be presented as an asset and amortized ratably over the term of the line of credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are outstanding borrowings on the arrangement. We currently present deferred financing costs related to our line of credit within Other assets.  ASU 2015-03 and ASU 2015-15 are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810), Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis” (“ASU 2015-02”), which amends the consolidation requirements in ASC 810, primarily related to limited partnerships and VIEs. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of this new standard on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01, “Income Statement-Extraordinary and Unusual Items” (“ASU 2015-01”), which simplifies income statement presentation by eliminating the need to determine whether to classify an item as an extraordinary item. ASU 2015-01 is effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU 2014-15”), which requires management to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and provide related disclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. transition guidance.

 

 6260 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

In May 2014,

2.Revenue

Adoption of the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09,new revenue standard

 “Revenue from Contracts

We adopted the new revenue standard on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”), which providesno impact on our financial statements. The cumulative effect of initially adopting the new guidance had no impact on the opening balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. There was no material impact on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018, or on the condensed consolidated statement of income for the recognition, measurement and disclosure of revenue resulting from contracts with customers and will supersede virtually all of the current revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. ASU 2014-09 is effectiveyear ended December 31, 2018. Results for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date" (“ASU 2015-14”), which delayed the effective date by one year. As a result, the standard is effective for us for fiscal and interim periods beginning January 1, 2018 are presented under the new revenue standard, while prior periods amounts are not adjusted and allowscontinue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under Topic 605.

Disaggregation of Revenue

The following table presents revenues disaggregated by revenue source:

  

Twelve Months Ended

December 31,

 
  2018  2017  2016 
  (in thousands)
Types of Revenue            
Broadcast Advertising Revenue, net $114,929  $109,175  $110,053 
Digital Advertising Revenue  3,900   3,610   3,567 
Other Revenue  6,000   5,364   5,335 
Net Revenue $124,829  $118,149  $118,955 

Nature of goods and services

The following is a description of principal activities from which we generate our revenue:

Broadcast Advertising Revenue

Our primary source of revenue is from the sale of advertising for full retrospective or modified retrospective methodsbroadcast on our stations. We recognize revenue from the sale of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impactadvertising as performance obligations are satisfied upon airing of the provisionsadvertising; therefore, revenue is recognized at a point in time when each advertising spot is transmitted. Agency commissions are calculated based on a stated percentage applied to gross billing revenue for our advertising inventory placed by agency and are reported as a reduction of this standardadvertising revenue.

Digital Advertising Revenue

We recognize revenue from our digital initiatives across multiple platforms such as targeted digital advertising, online promotions, advertising on our consolidated financial statements.websites, mobile messaging, email marketing and other e-commerce. Revenue is recorded when each specific performance obligation in the digital advertising campaign takes place, typically within a one month period.

Other Revenue

Other revenue includes revenue from concerts, promotional events, tower rent and other miscellaneous items. Revenue is generally recognized when the event is completed, as the promotional events are completed or as each performance obligation is satisfied.

61

Saga Communications, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Contract Liabilities

Payment is generally due within 30 days although certain advertisers are required to pay in advance. When a customer pays for the services in advance of the performance obligations and therefore these prepayments are recorded as contract liabilities. Typical contract liabilities relate to prepayments for advertising spots not yet run; prepayments from sponsors for events that have not yet been held; and gift cards sold on our websites used to finance a broadcast advertising campaign. Generally all contract liabilities are expected to be recognized within one year and are included in Accounts payable in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and are immaterial.

Transaction Price Allocated to the Remaining Performance Obligations

As the majority of our contracts are one year or less, we have utilized the optional exemption under ASC 606-10-50-14 and will not disclose information about the remaining performance obligations for contracts which have original expected durations of one year or less.

 

2.  3.Broadcast Licenses, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

 

We evaluate our FCC licenses for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. We operate our broadcast licenses in each market as a single asset and determine the fair value by relying on a discounted cash flow approach assuming a start-up scenario in which the only assets held by an investor are broadcast licenses. The fair value calculation contains assumptions incorporating variables that are based on past experiences and judgments about future operating performance using industry normalized information for an average station within a market. These variables include, but are not limited to: (1) the forecasted growth rate of each radio or television market, including population, household income, retail sales and other expenditures that would influence advertising expenditures; (2) the estimated available advertising revenue within the market and the related market share and profit margin of an average station within a market; (3) estimated capital start-up costs and losses incurred during the early years; (4) risk-adjusted discount rate; (5) the likely media competition within the market area; and (6) terminal values. If the carrying amount of FCC licenses is greater than their estimated fair value in a given market, the carrying amount of FCC licenses in that market is reduced to its estimated fair value.

 

We also evaluate goodwill in each of its reporting units (reportable segment) for impairment annually, or more frequently if certain circumstances are present. If the carrying amount of goodwill in a reporting unit is greater than the implied value of goodwill determined by completing a hypothetical purchase price allocation using estimated fair value of the reporting unit, the carrying amount of goodwill in that reporting unit is reduced to its implied value.

 

We utilize independent appraisals in testing FCC licenses and goodwill for impairment when indicators of impairment are present.

 

We evaluate amortizable intangible assets for recoverability when circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred, using an undiscounted cash flow methodology. If the future undiscounted cash flows for the intangible asset are less than net book value, then the net book value is reduced to the estimated fair value. Amortizable intangible assets are included in Otherother intangibles, deferred costs and investments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.consolidated balance sheets.

 

 6362 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

Broadcast Licenses

 

We have recorded the changes to broadcast licenses for the years ended December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 as follows:

 

 Radio  Television  Total  Continuing
Operations
  Discontinued
Operations
  Total 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
              
Balance at January 1, 2014 $78,872  $9,588  $88,460 
Balance at January 1, 2017 $86,622  $9,607  $96,229 
Acquisitions  219   19   238   8,086      8,086 
Dispositions     (9,607)  (9,607)
Impairment charge  (1,936)     (1,936)  (1,449)     (1,449)
Balance at December 31, 2014 $77,155  $9,607  $86,762 
Balance at December 31, 2017 $93,259  $  $93,259 
Acquisitions  2,218      2,218   1,991      1,991 
Impairment charge  (874)     (874)
Balance at December 31, 2015 $78,499  $9,607  $88,106 
Balance at December 31, 2018 $95,250  $  $95,250 

 

20152018 Impairment Test

 

We completed our annual impairment test of broadcast licenses during the fourth quarter of 20152018 and determined that the fair value of the broadcast licenses were lesswas greater than the amount reflected in the balance sheet for one of the Company’s radio markets, Columbus, Ohio, and recorded non-cash impairment charge of $874,000 to reduce the carrying value recorded for each of these assets to the estimated fair market value. The reasons for theour markets and, accordingly, no impairment to the broadcasting licenses recognized in the fourth quarter of 2015 were primarily due to declines in available market revenue, market revenue share, profit margins and estimated long-term growth rates in our Columbus, OH market.was recorded.

 

The following table reflects certain key estimates and assumptions used in the impairment test in the fourth quarter of 2015.2018, 2017 and 2016. The ranges for operating profit margin and market long-term revenue growth rates vary by market. In general, when comparing between 20152018, 2017 and 2014:2016: (1) the market specific operating profit margin range remained relatively consistent; (2) the market long-term revenue growth rates were relatively consistent; (3) the discount rate remained relatively consistent; and (4) current year revenues were 0.9 %3.9% lower than previously projected for 2015.2018.

 

  Fourth Fourth 
  Quarter Quarter 
  2015 2014 
Discount rates 12.2% - 12.4% 12.3% - 12.4% 
Operating profit margin ranges 19.5% - 36.4% 20.8% - 36.4% 
Market long-term revenue growth rates 1.3 % - 3.1% 1.2 % - 4.1% 

Fourth

Quarter
2018

Fourth

Quarter
2017

Fourth
Quarter
2016
Discount rates12.0% - 12.0%12.4% - 12.5%12.3% - 12.4%
Operating profit margin ranges19.0% - 36.4%19.0% - 36.4%19.5% - 36.4%
Market long-term revenue growth rates0.5% - 2.9%1.1% - 3.5 %1.0% - 2.9 %

 

If actual market conditions are less favorable than those estimated by us or if events occur or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of our broadcast licenses below the carrying value, we may be required to recognize additional impairment charges in future periods. Such a charge could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

63

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

20142017 Impairment Test

 

We completed our annual impairment test of broadcast licenses during the fourth quarter of 20142017 and determined that the fair value of the broadcast licenses were less than the amount reflected in the balance sheet for one of the Company’s radio markets, Columbus, Ohio,Springfield, Illinois, and recorded non-cash impairment charge of $1,936,000$1,449,000 to reduce the carrying value of these assets to the estimated fair market value. The reasons for the impairment to the broadcasting licenses recognized in the fourth quarter of 20142017 were primarily due to declines in available market revenue, market revenue share, profit margins and estimated long-term growth rates in our Columbus, OHSpringfield, Illinois market.

The following table reflects certain key estimates and assumptions used in the impairment test in2016 Impairment Test

During the fourth quarter of 2014. The ranges2016, we completed our annual impairment test of broadcast licenses and determined that the fair value of the broadcast licenses was greater than the carrying value recorded for operating profit margineach of our markets and, market long-term revenue growth rates vary by market. In general, when comparing between 2014accordingly, no impairment was recorded.

Goodwill

During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company performed its annual impairment test of its goodwill in accordance with ASC 350 and 2013: (1)determined under the market specific operating profit margin range remained relatively consistent; (2)first step that the market long-term revenue growth rates were relatively consistent; (3)fair value of our continuing operations was in excess of its carrying value.

We have recorded the discount rate remained relatively consistent;changes to goodwill for each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and (4) current year revenues were 1.6 % lower than previously projected for 2014.2017 as follows:

  Total 
  (in thousands) 
    
Balance at January 1, 2017 $7,407 
Acquisitions  8,151 
Balance at December 31, 2017 $15,558 
Acquisitions  3,281 
Balance at December 31, 2018 $18,839 

 

 64 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

  Fourth Fourth 
  Quarter Quarter 
  2014 2013 
Discount rates 12.3% - 12.4% 12.2% - 12.4% 
Operating profit margin ranges 20.8% - 36.4% 19.9% - 35.8% 
Market long-term revenue growth rates 1.2 % - 4.1% 1.9 % - 3.3% 

If actual market conditions are less favorable than those estimated by us or if events occur or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of our broadcast licenses below the carrying value, we may be required to recognize additional impairment charges in future periods. Such a charge could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

2013 Impairment Test

We completed our annual impairment test of broadcast licenses during the fourth quarter of 2013 and determined that the fair value of the broadcast licenses were less than the amount reflected in the balance sheet for three of the Company’s radio markets, Asheville, North Carolina; Keene, New Hampshire/Brattleboro, Vermont; and Mitchell, South Dakota, and recorded non-cash impairment charge of $2,033,000 to reduce the carrying value of these assets to the estimated fair market value. The reasons for the impairment to the broadcasting licenses recognized in the fourth quarter of 2013 were primarily due to declines in available market revenue, market revenue share, profit margins, and estimated long-term growth rates, combined with an increase in technical equipment costs in three of our markets.

The following table reflects certain key estimates and assumptions used in the impairment test in the fourth quarter of 2013. The ranges for operating profit margin and market long-term revenue growth rates vary based on our specific markets. In general, when comparing between 2013 and 2012: (1) the market specific operating profit margin range remained relatively consistent; (2) the market long-term revenue growth rates were relatively consistent; (3) the discount rate remained relatively consistent; and (4) current year revenues were 2.3% lower than previously projected for 2013.

  Fourth Fourth 
  Quarter Quarter 
  2013 2012 
Discount rates 12.2% - 12.4% 12.0% - 12.2% 
Operating profit margin ranges 19.9% - 35.8% 17.4% - 35.8% 
Market long-term revenue growth rates 1.9 % - 3.3% 1.75 % - 3.1% 

Goodwill

During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company performed its annual impairment test of its goodwill in accordance with ASC 350 and determined under the first step that the fair value of the Radio reporting unit was in excess of its carrying value (each segment is a reporting unit), and therefore, no impairment was indicated. For the years presented there was no goodwill related to the television reporting unit.Other Intangible Assets

 

We have recorded the changes to goodwillamortizable intangible assets at December 31, 2018 as follows:

  Gross       
  Carrying  Accumulated  Net 
  Amount  Amortization  Amount 
  (In thousands) 
Non-competition agreements $3,861  $3,861  $ 
Favorable lease agreements  5,965   5,504   461 
Customer relationships  4,660   2,634   2,026 
Other intangibles  1,943   1,683   260 
Total amortizable intangible assets $16,429  $13,682  $2,747 

We have recorded amortizable intangible assets at December 31, 2017 as follows:

  Gross       
  Carrying  Accumulated  Net 
  Amount  Amortization  Amount 
  (In thousands) 
Non-competition agreements $3,861  $3,861  $ 
Favorable lease agreements  5,965   5,468   497 
Customer relationships  3,546   1,529   2,017 
Other intangibles  1,834   1,630   204 
Total amortizable intangible assets $15,206  $12,488  $2,718 

Aggregate amortization expense for each ofthese intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 20152018, 2017 and 2014 as follows:2016, was $1,094,000, $860,000 and $642,000, respectively. Our estimated annual amortization expense for the years ending December 31, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 is $1,029,000, $813,000, $387,000, $39,000 and $35,000, respectively.

  Radio  Television  Total 
  (In thousands) 
          
Balance at January 1, 2014 $  $  $ 
Acquisitions  326      326 
Balance at December 31, 2014 $326  $  $326 
Acquisitions  2,548      2,548 
Balance at December 31, 2015 $2,874  $  $2,874 

 

 65 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Other Intangible Assets

We have recorded amortizable intangible assets at December 31, 2015 as follows:

  Gross       
  Carrying  Accumulated  Net 
  Amount  Amortization  Amount 
  (In thousands) 
Non-competition agreements $3,861  $3,861  $ 
Favorable lease agreements  5,990   5,638   352 
Customer relationships  1,346   177   1,169 
Other intangibles  1,920   1,638   282 
Total amortizable intangible assets $13,117  $11,314  $1,803 

We have recorded amortizable intangible assets at December 31, 2014 as follows:

  Gross       
  Carrying  Accumulated  Net 
  Amount  Amortization  Amount 
  (In thousands) 
Non-competition agreements $3,861  $3,861  $ 
Favorable lease agreements  5,862   5,613   249 
Other intangibles  1,766   1,609   157 
Total amortizable intangible assets $11,489  $11,083  $406 

Aggregate amortization expense for these intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, was $231,000, $54,000 and $52,000, respectively. Our estimated annual amortization expense for the years ending December 31, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 is $520,000, $520,000, $343,000, $71,000 and $67,000, respectively.

3.4.Discontinued Operations

 

On April 3, 2012May 9, 2017 we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our Greenville, Mississippi TV stationJoplin, Missouri and Victoria, Texas television stations (“WXVT”Television Sale”) for $3approximately $66.6 million, subject to certain adjustments, to H3 Communications, LLC (“H3”). This transactionEvening Telegram Company d/b/a Morgan Murphy Media. The Television Sale was completed on January 31, 2013September 1, 2017 and wethe Company received net proceeds of $69.5 million which included the sales price of $66.6 million, the sale of accounts receivable of approximately $3.4 million, offset by certain closing adjustments and transactional costs of $500 thousand. The Company recognized a pretax gain of approximately $223,000,$50.8 million as a result of the Television Sale in the third quarter of 2017. The gain net of tax onfor the saleTelevision Sale was $29.9 million. Effective September 1, 2017, the Company used $24.2 million of WXVT during the first quarterproceeds from the Television Sale to finance the acquisition of 2013,radio stations in South Carolina, which included within incomethe purchase price of $23 million, the purchase of $1.3 million in accounts receivable offset by certain closing adjustments and transactional costs of approximately $50,000 (as described in Note 10). On October 5, 2017 and November 3, 2017, the Company used $5,287,000 and $5,000,000 respectively of the proceeds from discontinued operations.the Television Sale to pay down a portion of its Revolving Credit Facility (as defined and described in Note 5).

 

In accordance with authoritative guidance we have reported the results of operations of WXVTthe Joplin, Missouri and Victoria, Texas television stations as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. For all previously reported periods, certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified. TheAll of the assets and liabilities of WXVTthe Joplin, Missouri and Victoria, Texas television stations have been classified as held for salediscontinued operations and the net results of operations have been reclassified from continuing operations to discontinued operations. WXVT wasThese were previously included in the Company’s television segment.

The following table shows the components of the results from discontinued operations associated with the Television Sale as reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2018  2017(4)  2016 
          
Net operating revenue $  $14,238  $23,636 
Station operating expense(1)     9,757   14,743 
Other operating (income) expense     31   (42)
Operating income     4,450   8,935 
Interest expense(2)     21   32 
Income before income taxes     4,429   8,903 
Pretax gain on the disposal of discontinued operations     50,842    
Total pretax gain on discontinued operations     55,271   8,903 
Income tax expense(3)     22,800   3,627 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax $  $32,471  $5,276 

(1)No depreciation expense was recorded by the Company beginning May 9, 2017, the date the Television segment assets’ were held for sale.

(2)Interest expense related to the Surtsey debt that is guaranteed by the Television stations. Our affiliate repaid this loan when the television stations were sold on September 1, 2017.

(3)The effective tax rates on pretax income from discontinued operations were approximately 41%.

(4)Results of operations for the Television stations are reflected through August 31, 2017. The effective date of the sale was September 1, 2017.

 

 66

SAGA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL

STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table represents the components of the results from discontinued operations associated with the Television Sale as reflected in the Company’s unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands):

  

December 31,

2018

  December 31,
2017
  December 31,
2016
 
          
Cash paid during the period            
Interest $  $21  $32 
Income taxes     23,260   2,677 
             
Significant operating non-cash items            
Depreciation and amortization(1) $  $445  $1,387 
Broadcast program rights amortization     418   628 
Barter revenue, net     18   32 
Acquisition of property and equipment        43 
Loss (gain) on sale of assets     31   (42)
Pretax gain on television sale     50,842    
             
Significant investing items            
Acquisition of property and equipment $  $335  $894 
Proceeds from sale and disposal of assets        (59)
Net proceeds from sale of television stations(2)     69,528    
Proceeds from insurance claim         

(1)No depreciation expense was recorded by the Company beginning May 9, 2017, the date the Television segment assets’ were held for sale.

(2)Net proceeds from the sale of the television stations reflect the sales price of $66.6 million, the sale of accounts receivable of approximately $3.4 million, offset by certain closing adjustments and transactional costs of approximately $500 thousand.

67 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

4.5.Long-Term Debt

 

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

 

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2015  2014 
  (In thousands) 
    
Credit Facility:        
Revolving Credit Facility $35,287  $- 
Old Credit Agreement:        
Term Loan  -   30,000 
Revolving credit  -   5,000 
Secured debt of affiliate  1,078   1,078 
   36,365   36,078 
Amounts payable within one year  -   - 
  $36,365  $36,078 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2018  2017 
  (In thousands) 
    
Credit Facility:        
Revolving Credit Facility $20,000  $25,000 
Amounts payable within one year  (5,000)   
  $15,000  $25,000 

 

Future maturities of long-term debt are as follows:

 

Year Ending December 31, (In thousands) 
    
2016 $ 
2017  1,078 
2018   
2019   
2020  35,287 
Thereafter   
  $36,365 
Year Ending
December 31,
 Amount 
  (In thousands) 
    
2019 $5,000 
2020   
2021   
2022   
2023  15,000 
Thereafter   
  $20,000 

 

On August 18, 2015, we entered into a new credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., The Huntington National Bank, Citizens Bank, National Association and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. In connection with the execution of the Credit Facility, the credit agreement in place at June 30, 2015 (the “Old Credit Agreement”) was terminated, and all outstanding amounts were paid in full. The Credit Facility consists of a $100 million five-year revolving facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and matures on August 18, 2020. On June 27, 2018, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to its Credit Facility, dated August 18, 2015, and amended on September 1, 2017, extending the revolving credit maturity date under the Credit Agreement for five years after the date of the amendment to June 27, 2023.

 

We have pledged substantially all of our assets (excluding our FCC licenses and certain other assets) in support of the Credit Facility and each of our subsidiaries has guaranteed the Credit Facility and has pledged substantially all of their assets (excluding their FCC licenses and certain other assets) in support of the Credit Facility.

 

 The proceeds from the Credit Facility were used to repay all amounts outstanding on our Old Credit Agreement and pay transactional fees. The unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility is available for general corporate purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures, permitted acquisitions and related transaction expenses and permitted stock buybacks. We wrote-off unamortized debt issuance costs relating to the Old Credit Agreement of approximately $557,000, pre-tax, due to entering into this new agreement during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Approximately $266,000 of debt issuance costs related to the Credit Facility were capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the Credit Facility. ThoseThese debt issuance costs are included in other assets, net in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. As a result of the Second Amendment, the Company incurred an additional $120,000 of transaction fees related to the Credit Facility that were capitalized. The cumulative transaction fees are being amortized over the remaining life of the Credit Facility.

 

 6768 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

Interest rates under the Credit Facility are payable, at our option, at alternatives equal to LIBOR (0.25%(2.4375% at December 31, 2015)2018), plus 1% to 2% or the base rate plus 0% to 1%. The spread over LIBOR and the base rate vary from time to time, depending upon our financial leverage. LetterLetters of credit issued under the Credit Facility will be subject to a participation fee (which is equal to the interest rate applicable to Eurocurrency Loans, as defined in the Credit Agreement) payable to each of the Lenders and a fronting fee equal to 0.25% per annum payable to the issuing bank. We also pay quarterly commitment fees of 0.2% to 0.3% per annum on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility.

 

 The Credit Facility contains a number of financial covenants (all of which we were in compliance with at December 31, 2015)2018) which, among other things, require us to maintain specified financial ratios and impose certain limitations on us with respect to investments, additional indebtedness, dividends, distributions, guarantees, liens and encumbrances.

 

We had approximately $65$80 million of unused borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility at December 31, 2015.2018.

 

Our OldOn February 4, 2019, the Company used $5,000,000 from funds generated by operations to voluntarily pay down a portion of its Revolving Credit Agreement consistedFacility and it is presented in current portion of a $30 million term loan and a $90 million revolving loan originally scheduled to mature on May 31, 2018. Our indebtedness under the Old Credit Agreement was secured by a first priority lien on substantially all oflong-term debt in our assets and of our subsidiaries, by a pledge of our subsidiaries’ stock and by a guarantee of our subsidiaries. The Old Credit Agreement was used for general corporate purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures, permitted acquisitions and related transaction expenses and permitted stock buybacks.

 Interest rates under the Old Credit Agreement were payable, at our option, at alternatives equal to LIBOR (0.16925%balance sheet at December 31, 2014), plus 1.25%2018.

On September 4, 2018, the Company used $5,000,000 from funds generated by operations to 2.25% or the base rate plus 0.25% to 1.25%. The spread over LIBOR and the base rate varied from time to time, depending upon our financial leverage. We also paid quarterly commitment fees of 0.25% to 0.35% per annum on the unusedpay down a portion of theits Revolving Credit Facility underFacility.

On October 5, 2017 and November 3, 2017, the OldCompany used $5,287,000 and $5,000,000, respectively, of the proceeds from the Television Sale to pay down a portion of its Revolving Credit Agreement.Facility.

 

 The loan agreement of approximately $1.1 million of secured debt of affiliate was amended in April, 20142017 to extend the due date of the loan for three years to mature on May 1, 2020. Our affiliate repaid this loan when the television stations were sold on September 1, 2017.

  

5.  6.Supplemental Cash Flow Information

 

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
  (In thousands) 
          
Cash paid during the period for:            
Interest $751  $874  $1,103 
Income taxes $6,164  $7,319  $7,134 
Non-cash transactions:            
Barter revenue $3,863  $3,844  $3,855 
Barter expense $3,750  $3,636  $3,844 
Purchase of treasury shares in connection with exercise of stock options $3,294  $  $ 
Acquisition of property and equipment $48  $91  $104 
Acquisition of broadcast properties $50  $  $ 

On May 31, 2013, we amended the Old Credit Agreement to, among other things, change the allocation between the term loan and the revolving credit facility to $30 million and $90 million, respectively. This change in allocation was a non-cash transaction resulting in an increase of $27,750,000 on the revolving credit facility outstanding and a decrease in the term loan outstanding of $27,750,000.  

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2018  2017  2016 
  (In thousands) 
          
Cash paid during the period for:            
Interest $884  $850  $636 
Income taxes $2,864  $2,420  $6,555 
Non-cash transactions:            
Barter revenue $3,570  $3,618  $3,471 
Barter expense $3,677  $3,367  $3,217 
Purchase of treasury shares in connection with exercise of stock options $  $826  $ 
Acquisition of property and equipment $11  $8  $49 
Use of treasury shares for 401(k) match $252  $274  $258 

 

 6869 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

6.  7.Income Taxes

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code, including, but not limited to, the following that impact us: (1) reducing the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent; (2) eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) and changing how existing AMT credits can be realized; (3) creating a new limitation on deductible interest expense; (4) repealing the domestic production activities deduction; (5) limiting the deductibility of certain executive compensation; and (6) limiting certain other deductions.

The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act. SAB 118 provides for a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date for companies to complete the accounting relating to the Tax Act under ASC 740. In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the Tax Act for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete. To the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in its financial statements. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in its financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of the Tax Act.

As a result of our initial analysis of the impact of the Tax Act, we recorded a provisional amount of net tax benefit of $11.5 million in 2017 related to the remeasurement of our deferred tax balance and other effects. We completed our accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Act in 2018, and no material adjustments were required to the provisional amounts initially recorded.

70

Saga Communications, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

  

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows:

 

 December 31,  December 31, 
 2015  2014  2018  2017 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
          
Deferred tax liabilities:                
Property and equipment $7,093  $7,727  $5,145  $4,333 
Intangible assets  21,668   18,134   19,324   17,640 
Prepaid expenses  374   621   350   317 
Total deferred tax liabilities  29,135   26,482   24,819   22,290 
Deferred tax assets:                
Allowance for doubtful accounts  226   158   118   116 
Compensation  2,210   3,264   906   1,058 
Other accrued liabilities  118   119   63   44 
  2,554   3,541   1,087   1,218 
Less: valuation allowance            
Total net deferred tax assets  2,554   3,541   1,087   1,218 
Net deferred tax liabilities $26,581  $22,941  $23,732  $21,072 
Current portion of deferred tax assets $1,107  $845  $303  $300 
Non-current portion of deferred tax liabilities  (27,688)  (23,786)  (24,035)  (21,372)
Net deferred tax liabilities $(26,581) $(22,941) $(23,732) $(21,072)

 

Deferred tax assets are required to be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. At December 31, 20152018 and December 31, 2014,2017, we do not have a valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets.

 

At December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, net deferred tax liabilities include a deferred tax asset of $1,074,000$1,087,000 and $2,082,000,$1,175,000, respectively, relating to deferred compensation, and stock-based compensation expense. Full realization ofexpense, accrued compensation, the tax asset related to stock based compensation requires stock options to be exercised at a price equaling or exceeding the sum of the grant price plus the fair value of the option at the grant dateallowance for doubtful accounts, and restricted stock to vest at a price equaling or exceeding the fair market value at the grant date. Accounting guidance, however, does not allow a valuation allowance to be recorded unless the company’s future taxable income is expected to be insufficient to recover the asset. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the price of the Company’s common stock will increase to levels sufficient to realize the entire tax benefit currently reflected in the balance sheets at December 31, 2015 and 2014. See Note 7 — Stock-Based Compensation for further discussion of stock-based compensation expense. During the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately 59,000 stock options expired of which approximately $893,000 had been previously recognized as stock compensation resulting in approximately $360,000 in tax expense. There were no stock option expirations in 2014 or 2013 that resulted in tax expense.other accrued expenses.

 

 6971 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

The significant components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:

 

 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
 2015  2014  2013  2018  2017  2016 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
              
Current:                        
Federal $4,850  $5,540  $6,210  $2,205  $2,545  $5,616 
State  1,150   1,125   1,125   835   (255)  1,010 
Total current  6,000   6,665   7,335   3,040   2,290   6,626 
Total deferred  3,640   3,385   2,805   2,660   (8,210)  2,247 
 $9,640  $10,050  $10,140 
Taxes are allocated as follows:            
Continuing operations $9,640  $10,050  $9,992 
Discontinued operations        148 
 $9,640  $10,050  $10,140 
Total Income Tax Provision $5,700  $(5,920) $8,873 

 

In addition, we recognized a tax expense (benefit) of $230,000, $10,000$0, ($100,000), and a tax benefit of $9,200$0 as a result of stock option exercises for the difference between compensation expense for financial statement and income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

 

The reconciliation of income tax at the U.S. federal statutory tax rates to income tax expense (benefit) is as follows:

 

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
  (In thousands) 
          
Tax expense at U.S. statutory rates $7,922  $8,630  $8,894 
State tax expense, net of federal benefit  1,115   1,249   1,192 
Other, net  603   178   105 
Change in valuation allowance on loss carry forwards     (7)  (51)
  $9,640  $10,050  $10,140 
Discontinued operations        148 
  $9,640  $10,050  $9,992 
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2018  2017  2016 
  (In thousands) 
          
Tax expense at U.S. statutory rates $4,017  $5,716  $7,665 
State tax expense (benefit), net of federal benefit  1,134   (769)  926 
Other, net  549   633   282 
Federal tax reform - deferred tax rate change     (11,500)   
  $5,700  $(5,920) $8,873 

The 2018 and 2016 effective tax rates exceed the federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes. The 2017 effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the impacts of the Tax Act and state income tax benefit on 2017’s earnings.  

 

The Company files income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and in various state and local jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal examinations by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for years prior to 2014.2015. During the first quarter of 2015, the IRS commenced an examination of the Company’s 2013 U.S. federal income tax return which was completed in the first quarter of 2016 and resulted in no changes to the return. The Company is subject to examination for income and non-income tax filings in various states.

 

As of December 31, 20152018, and 20142017 there were no accrued balances recorded related to uncertain tax positions.

 

We classify income tax-related interest and penalties that are related to income tax liabilities as interest expense and corporate general and administrative expense, respectively.a component of income tax expense. For the years ended December 31, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, we had no$31,000, $0, and $0, respectively, tax-related interest orand penalties and had $0 accrued at December 31, 20152018 and 2014.2017.

 

 7072 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

7.  8.Stock-Based Compensation

 

2005 Incentive Compensation Plan

 

On October 16, 2013 our stockholders approved the Second Amended and Restated Saga Communications, Inc. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan, (thewhich was amended in 2018 after approval of the amendment by our stockholders at our 2018 annual meeting (as amended, the “Second Restated 2005 Plan”). The 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan was first approved by stockholders in 2005 and replaced our 2003 Stock Option Plan (the “2003 Plan”), subsequently this plan was re-approved by stockholders in 2010. The changes made in 2013 in the Second Restated 2005 Plan (i) increased the number of authorized shares by 233,334 shares of Common Stock, (ii) extended the date for making awards to September 6, 2018, (iii) includes directors as participants, (iv) targets awards according to groupings of participants based on ranges of base salary of employees and/or retainers of directors, (v) requires participants to retain 50 % of their net annual restricted stock awards during their employment or service as a director, and (vi) includes a clawback provision. The 2018 amendment to the Second Restated 2005 planPlan (i) extended the date for making awards to September 6, 2023 and (ii) increased the number of authorized shares under the Plan by 90,000 shares of Class B Common Stock. The Second Restated 2005 Plan allows for the granting of restricted stock, restricted stock units, incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, and performance awards to eligible employees and non-employee directors.

 

The number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Second Restated 2005 Plan may not exceed 280,000370,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, 900,000990,000 shares of Class A Common Stock of which up to 620,000 shares of Class A Common Stock may be issued pursuant to incentive stock options and 280,000370,000 Class A Common Stock issuable upon conversion of Class B Common Stock. Awards denominated in Class A Common Stock may be granted to any employee or director under the Second Restated 2005 Plan. However, awards denominated in Class B Common Stock may only be granted to Edward K. Christian, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors, and the holder of 100% of the outstanding Class B Common Stock of the Company. Stock options granted under the Second Restated 2005 Plan may be for terms not exceeding ten years from the date of grant and may not be exercised at a price which is less than 100% of the fair market value of shares at the date of grant.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company’s stock-based compensation expense is measured and recognized for all stock-based awards to employees using the estimated fair value of the award. Compensation expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. For these awards, we have recognized compensation expense using a straight-line amortization method. Accounting guidance requires that stock-based compensation expense be based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest; therefore stock-based compensation has been adjusted for estimated forfeitures. When estimating forfeitures, we consider voluntary termination behaviors as well as trends of actual option forfeitures. All stock options were fully expensed at December 31, 2012, therefore there was no compensation expense related to stock options for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

 

 7173 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

All stock options were fully vested and expensed at December 31, 2012, therefore there was no compensation expense related to stock options for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. We calculated the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The estimated expected volatility, expected term of options and estimated annual forfeiture rate were determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

 

The following summarizes the stock option transactions for the Second Restated 2005 Plan, and the 2003 Plan for the year ended December 31:

 

      Weighted          Weighted    
      Average          Average    
    Weighted Remaining Aggregate     Weighted Remaining Aggregate 
 Number of Average Contractual Intrinsic  Number of Average Contractual Intrinsic 
 Options  Exercise Price  Term (Years)  Value  Options  Exercise Price  Term (Years)  Value 
                         
Outstanding at January 1, 2013  260,660  $34.69   3.0  $1,253,039 
Outstanding at January 1, 2016  29,035  $28.47   1.4  $289,769 
Granted                            
Exercised  (8,910)  29.41                       
Forfeited/canceled/expired  (17,963)  54.35                       
Outstanding at December 31, 2013  233,787  $33.38   2.1  $4,058,035 
Outstanding at December 31, 2016  29,035  $28.47   0.4  $633,834 
Granted                            
Exercised  (7,294)  34.80           (29,035)  28.47         
Forfeited/canceled/expired  (13,323)  57.93                       
Outstanding at December 31, 2014  213,170  $31.79   1.2  $2,519,147 
Outstanding at December 31, 2017    $     $ 
Granted                            
Exercised  (125,354)  27.09                       
Forfeited/canceled/expired  (58,781)  43.47                       
Outstanding at December 31, 2015  29,035  $28.47   1.4  $289,769 
Vested and Exercisable at December 31, 2015  29,035  $28.47   1.4  $289,769 
Outstanding at December 31, 2018    $     $ 
Vested and Exercisable at December 31, 2018    $     $ 

 

The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $1,120,153, $100,300,$0, $664,321, and $155,500,$0, respectively. Cash received from stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $101,200, $291,600$0, $354 and $311,500,$0, respectively.

 

There were no options granted during 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 and allthere were no stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2015 are fully vested.2018.

 

 7274 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

The following summarizes the restricted stock transactions for the year ended December 31:

 

    Weighted     Weighted 
    Average     Average 
    Grant Date     Grant Date 
 Shares  Fair Value  Shares  Fair Value 
             
Outstanding at January 1, 2013  5,531  $17.97 
Outstanding at January 1, 2016  106,789  $40.28 
Granted  50,062   46.51   48,471   48.60 
Vested  (5,531)  17.97   (51,368)  41.20 
Forfeited/canceled/expired        (630)  38.83 
Outstanding at December 31, 2013  50,062  $46.51 
Outstanding at December 31, 2016  103,262  $43.73 
Granted  56,756   38.11   48,780   44.20 
Vested  (16,529)  46.51   (54,598)  42.13 
Forfeited/canceled/expired  (457)  46.51   (805)  46.23 
Outstanding at December 31, 2013  89,832  $41.20 
Outstanding at December 31, 2017  96,639  $44.85 
Granted  55,081   40.09   63,811   37.37 
Vested  (36,142)  42.11   (49,493)  43.98 
Forfeited/canceled/expired  (1,982)  43.62   (1,781)  45.39 
Non-vested and outstanding at December 31, 2015  106,789  $40.28 
Non-vested and outstanding at December 31, 2018  109,176  $40.87 
Weighted average remaining contractual life (in years)  4.7       2.3     

 

The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock that vested during 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $1,522,000, $769,000$2,385,000, $2,300,000 and $99,000,$2,116,000, respectively. The net value of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards aggregated $3,993,000, $3,526,000$4,166,000, $4,063,000 and $2,210,000$4,223,000 at December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 we had $1,655,000, $826,000$2,201,000, $2,279,000 and $135,000,$2,101,000, respectively, of total compensation expense related to restricted stock-based arrangements. The expense is included in corporate general and administrative expenses in our results of operations. The associated tax benefit recognized for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $662,000, $330,000$251,000, $912,000 and $53,000,$840,000, respectively.

 

8.  9.Employee Benefit Plans

 

401(k) Plan

 

We have a defined contribution pension plan (“401(k) Plan”) that covers substantially all employees. Employees can elect to have a portion of their wages withheld and contributed to the plan. The 401(k) Plan also allows us to make a discretionary contribution. Total administrative expense under the 401(k) Plan was $2,300, $7,000$1,100, $1,700 and $5,000$1,200 in 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively. The Company’s discretionary contribution to the plan was approximately $250,000 $260,000$265,000, $255,000 and $240,000$275,000 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

 

 7375 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

Deferred Compensation Plan

 

In 1999 we established a Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan which allows officers and certain management employees to annually elect to defer a portion of their compensation, on a pre-tax basis, until their retirement. The retirement benefit to be provided is based on the amount of compensation deferred and any earnings thereon. Deferred compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $138,000, $123,000$149,000, $211,000 and $193,000,$184,000, respectively. We invest in company-owned life insurance policies to assist in funding these programs. The cash surrender values of these policies are in a rabbi trust and are recorded as our assets.

 

Split Dollar Officer Life Insurance

 

The Company provides split dollar insurance benefits to certain executive officers and records an asset equal to the cumulative premiums paid on the related policies, as the Company will fully recover these premiums under the terms of the plan. The Company retains a collateral assignment of the cash surrender values and policy death benefits payable to insure recovery of these premiums.

 

9.  10.Acquisitions and Dispositions

 

We actively seek and explore opportunities for expansion through the acquisition of additional broadcast properties. The consolidated statements of income include the operating results of the acquired stations from their respective dates of acquisition. All acquisitions were accounted for as purchases and, accordingly, the total purchase consideration was allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition dates. The excess of the consideration paid over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired have been recorded as goodwill. The Company accounts for acquisition under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 805,Business Combinations.

 

Management assigned fair values to the acquired property and equipment through a combination of cost and market approaches based upon each specific asset’s replacement cost, with a provision for depreciation, and to the acquired intangibles, primarily an FCC license, based on the Greenfield valuation methodology, a discounted cash flow approach.

 

2018 Acquisitions

Pending Acquisition

 

On November 2, 2015, weOctober 29, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to acquirepurchase WOGK-FM, WNDT-FM, WNDD-FM and WNDN-FM, from Ocala Broadcasting Corporation, LLC for an FM radio station (WLVQ) from Wilks Broadcast - Columbus, LLC, serving the Columbus, Ohio market for $13,000,000. We completedaggregate purchase price of $9.3 million, subject to certain purchase price adjustments. The Company closed this acquisition in the on February 3, 2016. We operated this station under a LMA from November 16, 2015 through our completion of the acquisition. This acquisition was financed throughtransaction effective December 31, 2018 using funds generated from operations in 2016.

2015 Acquisitions and Disposition

On July 13, 2015 we acquired an FM translator serving the Manchester, New Hampshire market for approximately $45,000. 

On August 1, 2015 we acquired two AM and three FM stations and one FM translator (WSVA-AM, WHBG-AM, WQPO-FM, WMQR-FM, WWRE-FM and WQPO-HD3) from M. Belmont VerStandig, Inc., serving the Harrisonburg, Virginia market for approximately $10,131,000,of $9.84 million, which included $128,000the purchase price of $9.3 million, the purchase of $566 thousand in accounts receivable by certain closing adjustments and transactional costs. Cashcosts of approximately $25 thousand, of which $552 thousand was utilized to fund the acquisition.paid in January 2019. Management attributes the goodwill recognized in the acquisition to the power of the existing brands in the Harrisonburg, VirginiaOcala, Florida market as well as the synergies and growth opportunities expected through the combination with the Company’s existing stations.

2017 Acquisitions and Dispositions

On August 26, 2015May 9, 2017 we acquired an FM translator serving the Asheville, North Carolina marketentered into a definitive agreement to sell our Joplin, Missouri and Victoria, Texas television stations for approximately $125,000. $66.6 million, subject to certain adjustments, to Evening Telegram Company d/b/a Morgan Murphy Media. The Television Sale was completed on September 1, 2017 and the Company received net proceeds of $69.5 million which included the sales price of $66.6 million, the sale of accounts receivable of approximately $3.4 million, offset by certain closing adjustments and transactional costs of approximately $500 thousand.

 

 7476 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

On May 9, 2017, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Apex Media Corporation and Pearce Development, LLC f/k/a Apex Real Property, LLC to purchase radio stations principally serving the South Carolina area for approximately $23 million (subject to certain purchase price adjustments) plus the right to air certain radio commercials, substantially all the assets related to the operation of the following radio stations: WCKN(FM), WMXF(FM), WXST(FM), WAVF(FM), WSPO(AM), W261DG, W257BQ, WVSC(FM), WLHH(FM), WOEZ(FM), W256CB, W293BZ. The Company closed this transaction effective September 1, 2015 we acquired two FM stations (WSIG-FM and WBOP-FM)2017, simultaneously with the closing of the Television Sale using funds generated from Gamma Broadcasting, LLC, serving the Harrisonburg, Virginia market for approximately $1,558,000,Television Sale of $24.2 million, which included $92,000the purchase price of $23 million, the purchase of $1.3 million in accounts receivable offset by certain closing adjustments and transactional costs. Cash was utilized to fund the acquisition. FCC multiple ownership rules prohibit us from owning bothcosts of these stations. In order to satisfy the multiple ownership requirements and receive FCC approval for this acquisition, we simultaneously donated WBOP-FM to Liberty University, Inc, a charitable organization. In exchange for donating WBOP-FM, including the Station, the FCC License and the Assets, we received an FM Translator W267BA, the FM Translator Assets, and the FM Translator FCC license, valued at approximately $50,000. We incurred a pre-tax loss of $400,000 as a result of this donation. This loss is recorded in other operating (income), expense, net on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and reported in cash flows from operating activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Management attributes the goodwill recognized in the acquisition to the power of the existing brands in the Harrisonburg, VirginiaCharleston, South Carolina and Hilton Head, South Carolina market as well as the synergies and growth opportunities expected through the combination with the Company’s existing stations.

 

On October 23, 2015January 16, 2017, we acquiredentered into an asset purchase agreement to purchase an FM translatorradio station (WCVL) from WUVA, Incorporated, serving the Charlottesville, Virginia market for approximately $30,000. 

On November 12, 2015$1,658,000, which included $8,000 in transactional costs. Simultaneously, we acquired an FM translator servingentered into a LMA to begin operating the Bucyrus, Ohio market for approximately $30,000. 

On November 23, 2015 we acquired an FM translator serving the Charlottesville, Virginia market for approximately $150,000. 

On December 31, 2015 we donated the Illinois Radio Network (“the network”) to the Illinois Policy Institute. The net book value of the networkstation on February 1, 2017. We completed this acquisition on April 18, 2017. This acquisition was approximately $7,000.

2014 Acquisitions and Dispositions

On January 31, 2014 we acquired one FM station (WFIZ-FM) and three FM Translators serving the Ithaca, New York market for approximately $720,000. 

On February 28, 2014 we acquired an FM translator serving the Jonesboro, Arkansas market for approximately $35,000. 

On May 9, 2014 we acquired an FM translator serving the Clarksville, Tennessee market for approximately $30,000. 

On May 14, 2014 we acquired an FM translator serving the Portland, Maine market for approximately $44,750. 

On May 16, 2014 we acquired two FM translators serving the Asheville, North Carolina market for approximately $100,000. 

On June 16, 2014 we acquired an FM translator serving the Des Moines, Iowa market for approximately $87,500. 

On November 4, 2014 we acquired an LPTV servicing the Victoria, Texas market for approximately $18,500.

On December 2, 2014 we sold the Michigan Radio Network, the Michigan Farm Network, the Minnesota News Network and the Minnesota Farm Network, for approximately $1,640,000. The net assets of these networks approximated $430,000, and as such recognized a gain of approximately $1,210,000 that is included in Other operating (income) expense in our 2014 Consolidated Statements of Income. Thefinanced through funds generated from operations. Unaudited proforma results of operations for the sale of these networksthis acquisition are not required, as such information is not material to our financial statements and as such aretherefore is not presented. These radio networks have historically been presented within our radio segment. The radio networks did not meetin the criteria of discontinued operations. pro forma tables in the following pages.

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet of 2018 and 2017 Acquisitions:

The following condensed balance sheets represent the estimated fair value assigned to the related assets and liabilities of the 2018 and 2017 acquisitions at their respective acquisition dates.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet of 2018 and 2017 Acquisitions

  Acquisitions in 
  2018  2017 
  (In thousands) 
Assets Acquired:        
Current assets $559  $1,390 
Property and equipment  3,007   6,678 
Other assets:        
Broadcast licenses  1,991   8,086 
Goodwill  3,281   8,151 
Other intangibles, deferred costs and investments  1,123   2,019 
Total other assets  6,395   18,256 
Total assets acquired  9,961   26,324 
Liabilities Assumed:        
Current liabilities  120   468 
Total liabilities assumed  120   468 
Net assets acquired $9,841  $25,856 

 7577 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet of 2015 and 2014 Acquisitions:

The following condensed balance sheets represent the estimated fair value assigned to the related assets and liabilities of the 2015 and 2014 acquisitions at their respective acquisition dates. The allocation of the purchase price for the 2015 acquisitions is preliminary at December 31, 2015. 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet of 2015 and 2014 Acquisitions

  Acquisitions in 
  2015  2014 
  (In thousands) 
Assets Acquired:        
Current assets $977  $45 
Property and equipment  4,614   424 
Other assets:        
Broadcast licenses-Radio segment  2,218   219 
Broadcast licenses-Television segment     19 
Goodwill-Radio segment  2,548   326 
Goodwill-Television segment      
Other intangibles, deferred costs and investments  1,623   3 
Total other assets  6,389   567 
Total assets acquired  11,980   1,036 
Liabilities Assumed:        
Current liabilities  82    
Total liabilities assumed  82    
Net assets acquired $11,898  $1,036 

Pro Forma Results of Operations for Acquisitions (Unaudited)

 

The following unaudited pro forma results of our operations for the years ended December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 assume the 20152018 and 2017 acquisitions occurred as of January 1, 2014.2017. The translators are start-up stations and therefore, have no pro forma revenue and expenses. The pro forma results give effect to certain adjustments, including depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, increased interest expense on acquisition debt and related income tax effects. The pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to indicate the results of operations which would actually have occurred had the combinations been in effect on the dates indicated or which may occur in the future.

 

76

Saga Communications, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

  

Years Ended December 31,

 
  2015  2014 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
Pro forma Consolidated Results of Operations      
Net operating revenue $139,458  $143,238 
Station operating expense  102,226   104,912 
Corporate general and administrative  10,091   8,901 
Other operating expenses (income), net  541   (1,210)
Impairment of intangible assets  874   1,936 
Operating income  25,726   28,699 
Interest expense  888   1,064 
Write-off of debt issuance costs  557    
Other income  (417)  (71)
Income taxes  10,314   11,179 
Net income $14,384  $16,527 
Basic earnings per share $2.52  $2.90 
Diluted earnings per share $2.51  $2.87 

  

Years Ended December 31,

 
  2015  2014 
  (In thousands) 
Radio Broadcasting Segment        
Net operating revenue $118,394  $122,867 
Station operating expense  88,146   91,655 
Other operating expenses (income), net  499   (1,210)
Impairment of intangible assets  874   1,936 
Operating income $28,875  $30,486 

  

Years Ended December 31,

 
  2015  2014 
  (In thousands) 
Television Broadcasting Segment        
Net operating revenue $21,064  $20,371 
Station operating expense  14,080   13,257 
Other operating expenses  32    
Operating income $6,952  $7,114 

77


Saga Communications, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Reconciliation of pro forma segment operating income to pro forma consolidated operating income:

  Radio  Television  

Corporate and
Other

  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
Year Ended December 31, 2015:            
Net operating revenue $118,394  $21,064  $  $139,458 
Station operating expense  88,146   14,080      102,226 
Corporate general and administrative        10,091   10,091 
Other operating expenses  499   32   10   541 
Impairment of intangible assets  874         874 
Operating income (loss) $28,875  $6,952  $(10,101) $25,726 

 Radio  Television  

Corporate and
Other

  Consolidated  Years Ended December 31, 
 (In thousands)  2018  2017 
Year Ended December 31, 2014:         
 (In thousands, except per share data) 
Pro forma Consolidated Results of Operations        
Net operating revenue $122,867  $20,371  $  $143,238  $129,228  $128,180 
Station operating expense  91,655   13,257      104,912   97,314   96,218 
Corporate general and administrative        8,901   8,901   11,359   11,657 
Other operating income  (1,210)        (1,210)
Other operating expenses  61   55 
Impairment of intangible assets  1,936         1,936      1,449 
Operating income (loss) $30,486  $7,114  $(8,901) $28,699 
Operating income  20,494   18,801 
Interest expense  946   903 
Interest income  (631)   
Other income  (23)   
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense  20,202   17,898 
Income tax expense (benefit) expense  5,944   (5,276)
Income from continuing operations, net of tax  14,258   23,174 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax     32,471 
Net income $14,258  $55,645 
Basic earnings per share:        
From continuing operations $2.40  $3.93 
From discontinued operations     5.50 
Basic earnings per share $2.40  $9.43 
        
Diluted earnings per share:        
From continuing operations $2.40  $3.93 
From discontinued operations     5.50 
Diluted earnings per share $2.40  $9.43 

 

 78 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

10.11.Related Party Transactions

 

Principal Stockholder Employment Agreement

 

In June 2011, we entered into a new employment agreement with Edward K. Christian, Chairman, President and CEO, which became effective as of June 1, 2011, and replaces and supersedes his prior employment agreement. OnWe entered into amendments to the agreement on February 12, 2016 we entered into an amendment to the agreement.(the “First Amendment”) and February 26, 2019 (the “Second Amendment”). The amendment extendsFirst Amendment extended the term of the employment agreement to March 31, 2021. The amendmentFirst Amendment also states that on each anniversary of the effective date of the employment agreement, the Company’s Compensation committee shall determine in its discretion the amount of any annual increases (which shall not be less than the greater of 4 % or a defined cost of living increase). Mr. Christian may defer any or all of his annual salary. The Second Amendment extends the term of the employment agreement from March 31, 2021 to March 31, 2025 and also makes certain clarifying modifications to the employment agreement.

 

Under the agreement, Mr. Christian is eligible for discretionary and performance bonuses, stock options and/or stock grants in amounts determined by the Compensation Committee and will continue to participate in the Company’s benefit plans. The Company will maintain insurance policies, will furnish an automobile, will pay for an executive medical plan and will maintain an office for Mr. Christian at its principal executive offices and in Sarasota County, Florida. The amendmentFirst Amendment adds that the Company is authorized to pay for Mr. Christian’s tax preparation services on an annual basis and that this amount will be subject to income tax as additional compensation. The agreement provides certain payments to Mr. Christian in the event of his disability, death or a change in control. Upon a change in control, Mr. Christian may terminate his employment. The agreement also provides generally that, upon a change in control, the Company will pay Mr. Christian an amount equal to 2.99 times the average of his total annual salary and bonuses for each of the three immediately preceding periods of twelve consecutive months, plus an additional amount for tax liabilities, related to the payment. For the three years ended December 31, 20152018 Mr. Christian’s average annual compensation, as defined by the employment agreement was approximately $1,463,000.$1,898,000.

 

In addition, if Mr. Christian’s employment is terminated for any reason, other than for cause, the Company will continue to provide health insurance and medical reimbursement and maintain existing life insurance policies for a period of ten years, and the current split dollar life insurance policy shall be transferred to Mr. Christian and his wife, and the Company shall reimburse Mr. Christian for any tax consequences of such transfer. The agreement contains a covenant not to compete restricting Mr. Christian from competing with the Company in any of its markets if he voluntarily terminates his employment with the Company or is terminated for cause, for a three year period thereafter. The first amendment also entitles Mr. Christian to receive severance pay equal to 100% of his then base salary for 24 months payable in equal monthly installments and after the date upon which notice of termination is given, any unvested or time-vested stock options previously granted to Mr. Christian by the Company shall become immediately one hundred percent (100%) vested to the extent permitted by law.

 

On December 16, 2013,13, 2016, Mr. Christian agreed to defer approximately $100,000 of his 20142017 salary to which was paid 100% on January 16, 2015.5, 2018. On December 2, 2014,5, 2017, Mr. Christian agreed to defer approximately $100,000 of his 20152018 salary which was paid 100% on January 8, 2016.4, 2019. On December 21, 2015,14, 2018, Mr. Christian agreed to defer approximately $100,000 of his 20162019 salary to be paid 100% on January 6, 2017.3, 2020.

 

79

Saga Communications, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Change in Control Agreements

 

In December 2007, Samuel D. Bush, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Warren S. Lada, Chief Operating Officer, Marcia K. Lobaito, Senior Vice President, Corporate Secretary and Director of Business Affairs, and Catherine Bobinski, Senior Vice President/Finance, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller, entered into Change in Control Agreements. In September 2018, Christopher S. Forgy, Senior Vice President of Operations entered into a Change in Control Agreement. A change in control is defined to mean the occurrence of (a) any person or group becoming the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 30% of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities and Mr. Christian ceasing to be Chairman and CEO of the Company; (b) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which results in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent more than 50% of the combined voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity; or (c) the approval of the stockholders of the Company of a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of its assets.

79

Saga Communications, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

If there is a change in control, the Company shall pay a lump sum payment within 45 days thereof of 1.5 times the average of the executive’s last three full calendar years of such executive’s base salary and any annual cash bonus paid. In the event that such payment constitutes a “parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G subject to an excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Company shall pay the executive an additional amount so that the executive will receive the entire amount of the lump sum payment before deduction for federal, state and local income tax and payroll tax. In the event of a change in control (other than the approval of plan of liquidation), the Company or the surviving entity may require as a condition to receipt of payment that the executive continue in employment for a period of up to six months after consummation of the change in control. During such six months, executive will continue to earn his pre-existing salary and benefits. In such case, the executive shall be paid the lump sum payment upon completion of the continued employment. If, however, the executive fails to remain employed during this period of continued employment for any reason other than (a) termination without cause by the Company or the surviving entity, (b) death, (c) disability or (d) breach of the agreement by the Company or the surviving entity, then executive shall not be paid the lump sum payment. In addition, if the executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause within six months prior to the consummation of a change in control, then the executive shall be paid the lump sum payment within 45 days of such change in control.

  

80

Saga Communications, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Transactions with Affiliate and Other Related Party Transactions

 

Until the Television Sale (discussed in Note 4) Surtsey Media, LLC (“Surtsey Media”) ownsowned the assets of television station KVCT in Victoria, Texas. Surtsey Media is a multi-media company 100%-owned by the daughter of Mr. Christian, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman. We operateoperated KVCT under a Time Brokerage Agreement (“TBA”) with Surtsey Media which we entered into in May 1999. Under the FCC’s ownership rules, we arewere prohibited from owning or having an attributable or cognizable interest in this station. In January 2012, the TBA was amended. Pursuant to the amendment, (i) the term was extended nine years commencing from June 1, 2013, with rights to extend for two additional eight year terms, (ii) we paid Surtsey Media an extension fee of $27,950 upon execution of the amendment, (iii) the monthly fees, payable to Surtsey Media were increased for each extension period, and (iv) we havehad an exclusive option, while the TBA iswas in effect, to purchase all of the assets of station KVCT, subject to certain conditions, based on a formula. Under the amended TBA, prior to the Television Sale, during 2015, 20142017, and 20132016 we paid Surtsey Media fees of approximately $3,800 $3,600 and $3,400$3,900 per month, respectively plus accounting fees and reimbursement of expenses actually incurred in operating the station. The TBA was terminated at the time of the completion of the Television Sale of September 1, 2017.

 

In March 2003, we entered into an agreement of understanding with Surtsey Media whereby we havehad guaranteed up to $1,250,000 of the debt incurred, in Surtsey Media closing the acquisition of a construction permit for KFJX-TV station in Pittsburg, Kansas, a full power Fox affiliate serving Joplin, Missouri. At December 31, 2015, there was $1,078,000 of debt outstanding under this agreement. We do not have any recourse provision in connection with our guarantee that would enable us to recover any amounts paid under the guarantee. As a result, at December 31, 2015, we have recorded $1,078,000 in debt and $1,000,000 in intangible assets, primarily broadcast licenses. In consideration for the guarantee, Surtsey Media entered into various agreements with us relating to the station, including a Shared Services Agreement, Technical Services Agreement, and Agreement for the Sale of Commercial Time and Broker Agreement (the “Station Agreements”). The station went on the air for the first time on October 18, 2003. Under the FCC’s ownership rules we arewere prohibited from owning or having an attributable or cognizable interest in this station. In January 2012, the Station Agreements were amended. Pursuant to the amendment, (i) the Broker Agreement and the Technical Services Agreement were terminated, (ii) the terms of the continuing Station Agreements were extended nine years commencing from June 1, 2013 , with rights to extend for two additional eight year terms, (iii) we paid Surtsey Media $37,050 upon execution of the amendment, (iv) the monthly fees payable to Surtsey Media were increased for each extension period, and (v) we havehad an exclusive option, while the Agreement for the Sale of Commercial Time and Shared Services Agreement arewere in effect, to purchase all of the assets of Station KFJX subject to certain conditions, based on a formula, together with a payment of $1.2 million. Under the amended Station Agreements, prior to the Television Sale, during 2015, 20142017 and 20132016 we paid fees of approximately $5,000, $4,800$5,200, and $4,500$5,100 per month, respectively, plus accounting fees and reimbursement of expenses actually incurred in operating the station. We generally prepayprepaid Surtsey quarterly for its estimated expenses.

80

Saga Communications, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued) As part of completion of the Television Sale, the debt we guaranteed was paid in full and the amended Station Agreements were terminated.

 

Surtsey Productions, Inc., the parent company of Surtsey Media, leases office space in a building owned by us, and paid us rent of $6,000, $6,000,$3,000 and $6,000 during the yearsfirst eight months of the year ended December 31, 2015, 20142017 prior to the Television Sale and 2013,the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

In December 2013, we soldSaga Quad States, our fully owned subsidiary, completed the acquisition from Apex Media Corporation, a used vehicleSouth Carolina corporation (“AMC”), and Pearce Development, LLC f/k/a Apex Real Property, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company (“ARP” and together with AMC, “Seller”), of substantially all of Seller’s assets related to the sonoperation of certain radio and translator stations, upon the satisfaction of certain closing conditions described in the Asset Purchase Agreement dated May 9, 2017 (the “Apex Agreement”) by and among Seller, Saga Quad States, and, solely in his role as guarantor under the Apex Agreement, G. Dean Pearce, as further described in the Form 8-K filed by Saga on May 10, 2017. Mr. Christian.Pearce is President of AMC and ARP, and currently serves on the Board of Directors of Saga. The vehiclepurchase price under the Apex Agreement was sold at its fair market value$23,000,000.00, subject to certain purchase price adjustments, payable in cash. The purchase price was determined through arm’s-length negotiations, and was approved by the Saga Board, and Finance and Audit Committee, in accordance with the requirements of $41,000.Saga’s Corporate Governance Guidelines for the review of related party transactions. In connection with this agreement, we received 500 hours of service from New Pointe Systems, a subsidiary of Pearce Development and have agreed to provide 1,000, 30 second, spots of airtime to Pearce Development. As of December 31, 2018, we have used the hours of service from New Pointe Systems, and we have approximately 1,000, 30 second spots left to provide to Pearce Development. During 2018 and 2017, we also paid approximately $4,100 and $3,300 rent per month, respectively to Pearce Development for our Hilton Head studio and office space beginning September 1, 2017.

81

Saga Communications, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

11.  12.Common Stock

 

Dividends.   Stockholders are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by our Board of Directors out of funds legally available for such purpose. However, no dividend may be declared or paid in cash or property on any share of any class of Common Stock unless simultaneously the same dividend is declared or paid on each share of the other class of common stock. In the case of any stock dividend, holders of Class A Common Stock are entitled to receive the same percentage dividend (payable in shares of Class A Common Stock) as the holders of Class B Common Stock receive (payable in shares of Class B Common Stock).

 

Voting Rights.   Holders of shares of Common Stock vote as a single class on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders, with each share of Class A Common Stock entitled to one vote and each share of Class B Common Stock entitled to ten votes, except (i) in the election for directors, (ii) with respect to any “going private” transaction between the Company and the principal stockholder, and (iii) as otherwise provided by law.

 

In the election of directors, the holders of Class A Common Stock, voting as a separate class, are entitled to elect twenty-five percent, or two, of our directors. The holders of the Common Stock, voting as a single class with each share of Class A Common Stock entitled to one vote and each share of Class B Common Stock entitled to ten votes, are entitled to elect the remaining directors. The Board of Directors consisted of sixseven members at December 31, 2015.2018. Holders of Common Stock are not entitled to cumulative voting in the election of directors.

 

The holders of the Common Stock vote as a single class with respect to any proposed “going private” transaction with the principal stockholder or an affiliate of the principal stockholder, with each share of each class of Common Stock entitled to one vote per share.

 

Under Delaware law, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of any class of common stock is required to approve, among other things, a change in the designations, preferences and limitations of the shares of such class of common stock.

 

Liquidation Rights.   Upon our liquidation, dissolution, or winding-up, the holders of Class A Common Stock are entitled to share ratably with the holders of Class B Common Stock in accordance with the number of shares held in all assets available for distribution after payment in full of creditors.

 

In any merger, consolidation, or business combination, the consideration to be received per share by the holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock must be identical for each class of stock, except that in any such transaction in which shares of common stock are to be distributed, such shares may differ as to voting rights to the extent that voting rights now differ among the Class A Common Stock and the Class B Common Stock.

 

Other Provisions.   Each share of Class B Common Stock is convertible, at the option of its holder, into one share of Class A Common Stock at any time. One share of Class B Common Stock converts automatically into one share of Class A Common Stock upon its sale or other transfer to a party unaffiliated with the principal stockholder or, in the event of a transfer to an affiliated party, upon the death of the transferor.

 

 8182 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

12.  13.Commitments and Contingencies

 

Leases

 

We lease certain land, buildings and equipment under noncancellable operating leases. Rent expense for our continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 20152018 was $1,477,000$1,603,000 ($1,503,0001,558,000 and $1,394,000$1,519,000 for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively).

 

Minimum annual rental commitments under noncancellable operating leases consisted of the following at December 31, 20152018 (in thousands):

 

2016 $1,327 
2017  1,144 
2018  1,016 
2019  732  $1,562 
2020  595   1,369 
2021  1,235 
2022  1,067 
2023  707 
Thereafter  3,472   2,023 
 $8,286  $7,963 

 

Broadcast Program RightsPerformance Fees

 

We haveThe Company incurs fees from performing rights organizations (“PRO”) to license the Company’s public performance of the musical works contained in each PRO’s repertory. The Radio Music Licensing Committee, of which the Company is a represented participant, (1) entered into contractsan industry-wide settlement with American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers that was effective January 1, 2017 for broadcast program rightsa five-year term; (2) is currently seeking reasonable industry-wide fees from Broadcast Music, Inc. effective January 1, 2017; (3) reached an agreement with the Society of European Stage Authors and Composers that expire at various dates duringis retroactive to January 1, 2016; and (4) filed in November 2016 a motion in the next five years. The aggregate minimum payments relatingU.S. District Court in Pennsylvania against Global Music Rights (“GMR”) arguing that GMR is a monopoly demanding monopoly prices and asking the Court to these commitments consisted ofsubject GMR to an antitrust consent decree. In January 2017, the following at December 31, 2015 (in thousands):Company obtained an interim license from GMR for fees effective January 1, 2017 to avoid any infringement claims by GMR for using GMR’s repertory without a license.

2016 $610 
2017  477 
2018  180 
2019  37 
2020  31 
Thereafter  55 
  $1,390 
Amounts due within one year (included in accounts payable)  610 
  $780 

 

Contingencies

 

In 2003, in connection with our acquisition of one FM radio station, WJZK-FM serving the Columbus, Ohio market, we entered into an agreement whereby we would pay the seller up to an additional $1,000,000 if we obtain approval from the FCC for a city of license change.

 

 8283 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

13.14.Fair Value Measurements

 

FairAs defined in ASC Topic 820, fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To increase the comparability of fair value measures, the following hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation methodologies used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

 

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data available, which requires management to develop its own assumptions in pricing the asset or liability.

 

We measure theOur assets and liabilities disclosed at fair value are summarized below ($000’s omitted):

    Fair Value 
Financial Instrument Fair Value
Hierarchy
 December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 
Cash and cash equivalents Level 1 $44,729  $53,030 
Revolving Credit Facility Level 2  20,000   25,000 

Our financial instruments are comprised of cash and cash equivalents, and long-term debt. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The fair value of time deposits based oncash and cash equivalents is derived from quoted market prices of similar assets and other significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data and are considered a level 2.1. Interest on the Credit Facility is at a variable rate, and as such the debt obligation outstanding approximates fair value and is considered a level 2.

 

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements

 

The Company has certain assets that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis under the circumstances and events described in Note 23 — Broadcast Licenses and Other Intangibles, and are adjusted to fair value only when the carrying values are more than the fair values.

 

During the fourth quarter of 2015,2018, the Company reviewed the fair value of the assets that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and concluded that these assets were not impaired as the fair value of these assets equaled or exceeded their carrying values.

During the fourth quarter of 2017, as a result of our annual impairment test, the Company wrote down broadcast licenses with a carrying value of $13,282,000$3,649,000 to their fair value of $12,408,000,$2,200,000, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $874,000,$1,449,000, which is included in net income for the year ended December 31, 2015.2017.  The categorization of the framework used to price the assets is considered a level 3, due to the subjective nature of the unobservable inputs used to determine the fair value. (See Note 2 for the disclosure of certain key assumptions used to develop the unobservable inputs.)

 

During the fourth quarter of 2014, as a result of our annual impairment test,2016, the Company wrote down broadcast licenses with a carrying value of $15,218,000 to theirreviewed the fair value of $13,282,000, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $1,936,000, which is included in net income for the year ended December 31, 2014.  The categorization of the framework used to price the assets is consideredthat are measured at fair value on a level 3, due tonon-recurring basis and concluded that these assets were not impaired as the subjective nature of the unobservable inputs used to determine the fair value. (See Note 2 for the disclosure of certain key assumptions used to develop the unobservable inputs.)

During the fourth quarter of 2013, as a result of our annual impairment test, the Company wrote down broadcast licenses with a carrying value of $8,620,000 to their fair value of $6,587,000, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $2,033,000, which is included in net income for the year ended December 31, 2013.  The categorization of the framework used to price thethese assets is considered a level 3, due to the subjective nature of the unobservable inputs used to determine the fair value. (See Note 2 for the disclosure of certain key assumptions used to develop the unobservable inputs.)

14.  Segment Information

We evaluate the operating performance of our markets individually. For purposes of business segment reporting, we have aligned operations with similar characteristics into two business segments: Radio and Television.

83

Saga Communications, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The Radio segment includes twenty-four markets, which includes all ninety-nine of our radio stations and one radio network in 2015 and five radio networks in 2014 and 2013. The Television segment includes two markets and consists of four television stations and five low power television (“LPTV”) stations. The Radio and Television segments deriveequaled or exceeded their revenue from the sale of commercial broadcast inventory. The category “Corporate general and administrative” represents the income and expense not allocated to reportable segments. carrying values.

        Corporate    
  Radio  Television  and Other  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
             
Year ended December 31, 2015:                
Net operating revenue $111,792  $21,064  $  $132,856 
Station operating expense  83,188   14,080      97,268 
Corporate general and administrative        10,091   10,091 
Other operating expense  499   32   10   541 
Impairment of intangible assets  874         874 
Operating income (loss) from continuing operations $27,231   6,952   (10,101)  24,082 
Depreciation and amortization $5,135   1,399   290   6,824 
Capital additions $3,436   1,970   137   5,543 
Broadcast licenses, net $78,499   9,607      88,106 
Total assets at December 31, 2015 $150,855   23,091   30,625   204,571 

        Corporate    
  Radio  Television  and Other  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
             
Year ended December 31, 2014:                
Net operating revenue $113,627  $20,371  $  $133,998 
Station operating expense  85,167   13,257      98,424 
Corporate general and administrative        8,901   8,901 
Other operating income  (1,210)        (1,210)
Impairment of intangible assets  1,936         1,936 
Operating income (loss) from continuing operations $27,734   7,114   (8,901)  25,947 
Depreciation and amortization $5,023   1,411   268   6,702 
Capital additions $3,856   929   739   5,524 
Broadcast licenses, net $77,155   9,607      86,762 
Total assets at December 31, 2014 $142,068   22,509   27,467   192,044 

 

 84 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

        Corporate    
  Radio  Television  and Other  Consolidated 
  (In thousands) 
             
Year ended December 31, 2013:                
Net operating revenue $109,818  $19,660  $  $129,478 
Station operating expense  79,933   13,044      92,977 
Corporate general and administrative        8,172   8,172 
Impairment of intangible assets  2,033         2,033 
Operating income (loss) from continuing operations $27,852  $6,616  $(8,172) $26,296 
Depreciation and amortization $5,119  $1,421  $228  $6,768 
Capital additions $3,884  $872  $396  $5,152 

 

15.Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

 

 March 31,  June 30,  September 30,  December 31,  March 31,  June 30,  September 30,  December 31, 
 2015  2014  2015  2014  2015  2014  2015  2014  2018  2017*  2018  2017  2018  2017  2018  2017 
 (In thousands, except per share data)  (In thousands, except per share data) 
Net operating revenue $29,061  $29,423  $34,358  $33,831  $33,831  $34,373  $35,606  $36,371  $28,009  $26,155  $32,234  $30,261  $31,648  $30,269  $32,938  $31,464 
Station operating expenses  22,765   22,947   24,311   23,499   24,324   26,366   25,868   25,612   23,397   21,340   23,140   21,426   23,429   21,755   23,761   23,238 
Corporate G&A  2,482   2,153   2,583   2,120   2,577   2,307   2,449   2,321   2,544   2,863   2,848   2,880   2,813   3,132   3,154   2,782 
Other operating expense (income), net        14      433      94   (1,210)  (251)  (21)  213   79   85   (127)  14   124 
Impairment of intangible assets                    874   1,936                        1,449 
Operating income from continuing operations  3,814   4,323   7,450   8,212   6,497   5,700   6,321   7,712   2,319   1,973   6,033   5,876   5,321   5,509   6,009   3,871 
Other (income) expenses:                                                                
Interest expense  241   272   244   272   229   268   174   252   219   208   255   229   243   254   229   212 
Write-off of debt issuance costs              557             
Other (income) expenses  (8)  (15)  (409)  (30)     7      (33)
Income before income tax  3,581   4,066   7,615   7,970   5,711   5,425   6,147   7,493 
Income tax provision  1,450   1,627   3,141   3,193   2,599   2,180   2,450   3,050 
Interest (income)  (89)     (188)     (167)     (187)   
Other (income) expense              (25)     2    
Income from continuing operations before income taxes  2,189   1,765   5,966   5,647   5,270   5,255   5,965   3,659 
Income tax provision (benefit)  660   718   1,795   2,272   1,575   2,290   1,670   (11,200)
Income from continuing operations, net of tax  1,529   1,047   4,171   3,375   3,695   2,965   4,295   14,859 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax     891      1,159      30,451      (30)
Net income $2,131  $2,439  $4,474  $4,777  $3,112  $3,245  $3,697  $4,443  $1,529  $1,938  $4,171  $4,534  $3,695  $33,416  $4,295  $14,829 
                                                                
Basic earnings (loss) per share                                
From continuing operations $0.26  $0.18  $0.70  $0.57  $0.62  $0.50  $0.72  $2.52 
From discontinued operations     0.15      0.20      5.16      (0.01)
Basic earnings per share $.37  $.43  $.77  $.83  $.54  $.56  $.63  $.77  $0.26  $0.33  $0.70  $0.77  $0.62  $5.66  $0.72  $2.51 
Weighted average common shares  5,710   5,690   5,712   5,699   5,724   5,699   5,732   5,709   5,842   5,795   5,834   5,803   5,822   5,807   5,820   5,815 
                                                                
Diluted earnings (loss) per share                                
From continuing operations $0.26  $0.18  $0.70  $0.57  $0.62  $0.50  $0.72  $2.52 
From discontinued operations     0.15      0.20      5.16      (0.01)
Diluted earnings per share $.36  $.42  $.77  $.82  $.53  $.56  $.63  $.76  $0.26  $0.33  $0.70  $0.77  $0.62  $5.66  $0.72  $2.51 
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares  5,762   5,757   5,757   5,754   5,752   5,742   5,741   5,757   5,842   5,808   5,834   5,806   5,822   5,807   5,820   5,815 

* March 31, 2017 quarterly data have been reclassified to conform with current presentation. 

 85 

 

 

Saga Communications, Inc.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

 

16. Litigation

16.Litigation

 

The Company is subject to various outstanding claims which arise in the ordinary course of business and to other legal proceedings. Management anticipates that any potential liability of the Company, which may arise out of or with respect to these matters, will not materially affect the Company’s financial statements.

 

Nielsen Audio, Inc. (formerly Arbitron, Inc.) (“Nielsen”) filed suit against the Company and one of its subsidiaries, Lakefront Communications, LLC, in the United States District Court in Delaware alleging they have infringed certain of Nielsen’s copyrights.  The case was dismissed on December 1, 2014 when we entered into agreements to license historic Nielsen data in selected markets, in conjunction with entering into licenses to receive Nielsen reports and services for future periods in those markets. The historic data that was licensed will allow us to make historic period comparisons as we utilize the Nielsen reports and services in the future, and the related license fee for the historic data was expensed in 2014.

17. Other Income

17.Other Income

 

During the secondthird quarter of 2015, two transmitters2016, the Company sold a tower in our Victoria, TexasNorfolk, Virginia market were significantly damaged by lightning.for approximately $1,619,000 to SBA Towers IX, LLC (“SBA”). Subsequently, we entered into a ten year lease for tower space from SBA with three renewal periods of five years each. The Company’s insurance policy provided coveragetransactions described have been accounted for as a sale-leaseback transaction. Accordingly, the replacement costCompany recognized a gain on the sale of assets of approximately $1,415,000, which is the amount of the transmitters. The insurance settlement was finalized during the second quarter and the Company received cash proceeds of $777,000, resulting in a $417,000 gain. The gain on insurance settlement represents the difference between the replacement cost and carryingsale in excess of present value of future lease payments and will recognize the transmitters.remaining approximately $65,000 in proportion to the related gross rental charged to expense over the term of the lease. The gain is recorded in the other income,operating (income) expense, net in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

18. Subsequent Events

18.Subsequent Events

 

On March 2, 2016,February 26, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular cash dividend of $0.25$0.30 per share on its Classes A and B Common Stock. This dividend, totaling approximately $1.5$1.8 million, will be paid on April 15, 2016March 29, 2019 to shareholders of record on March 28, 2016.12, 2019.

 

 86 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 14, 2016.15, 2019.

 

 SAGA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
   
 By:/s/   Edward K. Christian
  Edward K. Christian
  President

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 14, 2016.15, 2019.

 

Signatures  
   
/s/  Edward K. Christian President, Chief Executive Officer and
Edward K. Christian Chairman of the Board
   
/s/  Samuel D. Bush Senior Vice President,
Samuel D. Bush Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
   
/s/  Catherine A. Bobinski Senior Vice President/Finance,
Catherine A. Bobinski Chief Accounting Officer and
  Corporate Controller
   
/s/ Clarke R. Brown, Jr. Director
Clarke R. Brown, Jr.  
   
/s/  Timothy J. Clarke Director
Timothy J. Clarke  
   
/s/  Roy F. Coppedge III Director
Roy F. Coppedge  
   
/s/  David B. StephensG. Dean Pearce Director
David B. StephensG. Dean Pearce
/s/  Warren LadaDirector
Warren Lada  
   
/s/  Gary G. Stevens Director
Gary G. Stevens  

 

 87 

 

  

EXHIBIT INDEX

  

Exhibit No.   Description
     
3(a) 3 Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation, restated as of December 12, 2003.
3(b) 6 Certificate of Amendment to the Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
3(c) 4 Bylaws, as amended May 23, 2007.
10(a) 1 Summary of Executive Insured Medical Reimbursement Plan.
10(b) 2 Saga Communications, Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Option Plan.
10(c) 7 Chief Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan.
10(d) 9 Second Amended and Restated Saga Communications, Inc. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan
10(e) 10 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Second Amended and Restated Saga Communications, Inc. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan.
10(f) 10 Form of Restricted Stock Option Agreement under the Second Amended and Restated Saga Communications, Inc. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan.
10(g) 8 Employment Agreement of Edward K. Christian dated as of June 17, 2011.
10(h) 5 Change in Control Agreement of Samuel D. Bush dated as of December 28, 2007.
10(i) 5 Change in Control Agreement of Warren S. Lada dated as of December 28, 2007.
10(j) 5 Change in Control Agreement of Marcia K. Lobaito dated as of December 28, 2007.
10(k) *13 Change in Control Agreement of Catherine A. Bobinski dated as of December 28, 20072007.
10(l) 12 Amendment to Employment Agreement of Edward K. Christian dated as of February 12, 2016.
10(m) 11 Credit Agreement dated August 18, 2015 entered into between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., The Huntington National Bank and Citizens Bank.
2110(n) *14 Subsidiaries.Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Saga Broadcasting, LLC, Saga Quad States Communications, LLC, Saga Communications, Inc. and Evening Telegram Company d/b/a Morgan Murphy Media, dated May 9, 2017.

23.1

10(o)
 

*

14
 

Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Apex Media Corporation, Pearce Development, LLC f/k/a Apex Real Property, LLC, Saga Quad States Communications, LLC and G. Dean Pearce, dated May 9, 2017.

10(p)15Amendment to the Second Amendment and Restated Saga Communications, Inc. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan as of April 16, 2018.
10(q)16First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated September 1, 2017 entered into between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., The Huntington National Bank and Citizens Bank.
10(r)16Letter of Employment for Christopher S. Forgy, Senior Vice President / Operations effective May 28, 2018.
10(s)17Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated June 27, 2018 entered into between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., The Huntington National Bank and Citizens Bank.
10(t)18Change in Control Agreement of Christopher Forgy dated as of September 28, 2018.
10(u)19Amendment to Employment Agreement of Edward K. Christian dated as of February 26, 2019.
21*Subsidiaries.
23*Consent of UHY LLP.

23.231.1 * Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
31.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 * Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32 * Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS * XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH * XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL * XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF * XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB * XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE * XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

  

 88 

 

 

*Filed herewith.
  
1Exhibit filed with Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated by reference herein.
 
12Exhibit filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1From 8-A (File No. 33-47238)333-107686) filed on December 10, 1992 and incorporated by reference herein.
2Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,August 5, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein.
  
3Exhibit filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No. 001-11588) filed on January 6, 2004 and incorporated by reference herein.
  
4Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.
  
5Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2008 and incorporated by reference herein.
  
6Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 29, 2009 and incorporated by reference herein.
  
7Exhibit filed with the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and incorporated by reference herein.
  
8Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and incorporated by reference herein.
  
9Exhibit filed as Appendix A to the Company’s Consent Solicitation (File No. 001-11588) filed on September 17, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein.
  
10Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein.
  
11Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2015 and incorporated by reference herein.

12

 
12Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2016 and incorporated by reference herein.
13Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and incorporated by reference herein.
14Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 8-K filed on May 10, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein.
15Exhibit filed as Appendix A to the Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement (File No. 001-11588) filed on April 16, 2018 and incorporated by reference herein.
16Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 and incorporated by reference herein.
17Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 27, 2018 and incorporated by reference herein.
18Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 28, 2018 and incorporated by reference herein.
19Exhibit filed with the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 1, 2019 and incorporated by reference herein.

 

 89