UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162017

ORor

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to _____

Commission file number 1-08546

TRINITY PLACE HOLDINGS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(212) 235-2190

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities ActAct.

Yes¨ Nox

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes¨ Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesx No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yesx No¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.¨x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”,filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:Act.

Large Accelerated Filer¨   Accelerated Filerx	Accelerated Filerx
Non-Accelerated Filer¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller Reporting Company¨
Emerging Growth Company¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes¨ Nox

As of June 30, 2016,2017, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $151,304,000.$175,834,000.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distributions of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yesx No¨

As of March 15, 2017,2018, there were 29,343,44131,554,643 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to the registrant’s 20172018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed hereafter are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Form 10-K Index

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including information included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on or any supplement to this Annual Report, may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and information relating to us that are based on the beliefs of management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions that are not historical facts, and other statements identified by words such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” believes,” “plans,” “estimates,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative thereof or other and similar expressions. In addition, in some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by words or phrases such as “trend,” “potential,” “opportunity,” “believe,” “comfortable,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “current,” “intention,” “estimate,” “position,” “assume,” “outlook,” “continue,” “remain,” “maintain,” “sustain,” “seek,” “achieve,” and similar expressions. Such statements reflect our current views with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including among others:

In evaluating such statements, you should specifically consider the risks identified under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report and in any Annual Report supplement,on Form 10-K, any of which could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results or outcomes may vary materially from those contemplated by any forward looking statements. Subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements in this paragraph and elsewhere described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or, in the case of any documents incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the date of such document, in each case based on information available to us as of such date, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by law.

PART I

Overview

Trinity Place Holdings Inc. (“Trinity,” “we”, “our”, or “us”) is a real estate holding, investment and asset management company. Our business is primarily to own,acquire, invest in, own, manage, develop or redevelop and sell real estate assets and/or real estate related securities. Currently, ourOur largest asset is currently a property located at 77 Greenwich Street (“77 Greenwich”) in Lower Manhattan. 77 Greenwich iswas a vacant building that is beingwas demolished and is under development as a residential condominium tower that also includes plans for retail and a New York City elementary school. We also own a retail strip center located in West Palm Beach, Florida, formera property formerly occupied by a retail propertiestenant in Westbury, New York and Paramus, New Jersey, and, through a joint venture, a 50% interest in a newly constructed 95-unit multi-family property, known as The Berkley, located in Brooklyn, New York. In addition,York (see Item 2. Properties for a more detailed description of our properties). We are also under contract to purchase a newly built 105-unit, 12 story apartment building located at 237 11^th Street for $81.0 million, which we expect to close in the spring of 2018 (seeTransactions, Development and Other Activities During 2017 - Acquisitionsand Divestitures below for more details). We continue to evaluate new investment opportunities.

We also control a variety of intellectual property assets focused on the consumer sector, a legacy of our predecessor, Syms Corp. (“Syms”), including our on-line marketplace at FilenesBasement.com, launched in September 2015,our rights to the Stanley Blacker® brand, as well as the intellectual property associated with the Running of the Brides® event and weAn Educated Consumer is Our Best Customer® slogan. We also had approximately $230.2$231.0 million of federal net operating losses (“NOLs”)NOLs at December 31, 2016.2017.

Business and Growth Strategies

Our primary business objective is to maximize the risk adjusted return on investment in our legacy Syms assetsportfolio properties and new acquisitions and investments across all points of the economic cycle. Our strategies to achieve this objective include, among others, the following:

Transactions, Development and Other Activities During 2016

Acquisitions

We formed a 50/50 joint venture between a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, and an affiliate of Pacolet Milliken Enterprises, Inc., which purchased The Berkley, a newly constructed 95- unit multi-family property for $68,875,000 on December 5, 2016. The Berkley was 72.6% leased at December 31, 2016.

Developments/Redevelopments

We completed the environmental remediation and began interior demolition at 77 Greenwich, awarded the building demolition contract and completed the architectural drawings. We continue to work with the New York City School Construction Authority to refine the framework for the proposed construction of a public school on the lower floors of 77 Greenwich. We also received the necessary approvals from the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission, the Mayor’s Office and City Council for this project and have applied for the necessary building permits.

We completed the façade, roofing, parking lot and landscaping portions of the redevelopment project at our West Palm Beach property. We will incur additional lease-up costs as the current vacancies are filled.

We have entered into an agreement with an investment grade tenant pursuant to which we granted the tenant an option to lease our property in Paramus, New Jersey. The lease option agreement contemplates the construction of a building by the tenant after our demolition of the existing buildings and completion of minimal site work. The contemplated use and site plan under the lease option agreement are subject to town approvals.

We entered into short-term license agreements with a retail tenant at both our Westbury and Paramus properties in order to mitigate our carry costs while we evaluate a variety of opportunities.

Secured Debt Transactions

We closed on a loan of $12.6 million secured by our West Palm Beach, Florida property, of which $9.1 million was outstanding at December 31, 2016. This three-year loan bears interest at the 30-day LIBOR plus 230 basis points.

Together with our joint venture partner, we closed on a $42.5 million loan in connection with the acquisition of The Berkley. This 10-year loan bears interest at the 30-day LIBOR plus 216 basis points.

Equity Transactions

We established an “at-the-market” common stock offering program (the “ATM Program”) for up to $12.0 million of common shares and raised gross proceeds of approximately $1.2 million at a weighted average price of $9.76 per share.

Claims Satisfaction

We paid approximately $7.7 million of approved claims, including the final payment to the former Majority Shareholder following the occurrence of a General Unsecured Claims Satisfaction under the Plan.

Competition

The markets in which our properties are located are inherently competitive. With respect to our properties currently located in Paramus, New Jersey; West Palm Beach, Florida; Westbury, New York; our joint venture property located in Brooklyn, New York, and with respect to any future real estate assets that we acquire or develop, we will be competing for some of the same tenants, contractors, lenders and potential purchasers or investors with respect to other properties within the same markets but owned by other investors.

Competitive factors with respect to 77 Greenwich may have a more material effect on us as it is currently our most significant real estate asset. Various municipal entities are making and have indicated an intent to continue to make significant investments in the immediate vicinity of 77 Greenwich to support the growth of the downtown Manhattan neighborhood as a vibrant 24/7 community to work, visit and live. Several privately funded commercial and residential developments are being constructed or have been proposed to take advantage of the increasing desirability of the neighborhood. The impact of these changing supply and demand characteristics is uncertain, and they could positively or negatively impact our evolving plan to maximize the value of 77 Greenwich.

In addition, we will face competition in identifying and completing new investment and acquisition opportunities, including from larger and more established real estate firms with greater capital resources and access to financing.

Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Matters

Environmental Compliance

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real-estate may be required to investigate and remediate hazardous or toxic substances at a property, and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage or personal injuries and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by the parties in connection with the contamination. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator had knowledge of, or was responsible for, the release of the hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or lease real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral.

Other federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations require abatement or removal of asbestos-containing materials in the event of demolition or certain renovations or remodeling, the cost of which may be substantial for certain redevelopment projects that a potential purchaser would want to undertake with respect to any particular parcel of real estate we own. Such laws, ordinances and regulations also govern emissions from and exposure to asbestos fibers in the air. Federal and state laws also regulate the operation and removal of underground storage tanks. In connection with the ownership and management of certain properties, we could be held liable for the costs of remedial action with respect to these regulated substances or related claims.

Zoning and Planning

In connection with any development or redevelopment of our properties, whether currently owned or acquired or invest in the future, we will be required to comply with applicable zoning, land-use, building, occupancy, and other laws and regulations. In many cases we are and will continue to be required to obtain governmental permits, site plan approvals and/or other authorizations, or seek variances, prior to proceeding with planned development, acquisition or other activities.

Chapter 11 Cases and Plan of Reorganization of Syms Corp.

UnderTrinity is the successor to Syms, which also owned Filene’s Basement. Syms and its subsidiaries filed for relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code in 2011. In September 2012, the Syms Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) became effective and Syms and its subsidiaries consummated their reorganization under Chapter 11 through a series of transactions contemplated by the Plan and prioremerged from bankruptcy. As part of those transactions, reorganized Syms merged with and into Trinity, with Trinity as the surviving corporation and successor issuer pursuant to Rule 12g-3 under the General Unsecured Claim Satisfaction that occurred in 2016, our business plan was focused on the monetization of our commercial real estate properties, including the development of 77 Greenwich and related development rights, and the resolution of outstanding claims. During the period from the effective date of the Plan in 2012 through December 31, 2016, we sold 13 properties and paid approximately $116.2 million in approved claims, of which $7.7 million was paid in 2016.Exchange Act.

On or about March 8, 2016, a General Unsecured Claim Satisfaction occurred under the Plan. On March 14, 2016, we made the final Majority Shareholder payment (as defined in the Plan) to the former Majority Shareholder in the amount of approximately $6.9 million. Together these satisfied our remaining payment and reserve obligations under the Plan.  Also, in connection with these events and pursuant to the terms of our Certificate of Incorporation, the board terms of certain of our directors automatically terminated, following which the Board reappointed those directors, and shares of preferred stock issued in connection with the Plan, which conveyed certain governance rights in favor of creditors under the Plan, were automatically redeemed, resulting in the extinguishment of the governance and other rights associated with the shares of preferred stock.

As noted above, upon the effective date of the Plan of Reorganization in 2012 and pursuant to its terms, Syms and its subsidiaries were reorganized and, subject to the obligations under the Plan, discharged of all claims. To effect the reorganization, Syms was reincorporated in Delaware by way of a merger with and into Trinity. As a result of the merger, each share of Syms was converted into one share of Trinity. Under the Plan, Trinity was to attempt to monetize its real estate assets over time in a manner intended to maximize their value for the benefit of creditors and shareholders.

As of December 31, 2016, the amount of remaining multiemployer pension plan claims was $2.5 million (see Note 8 – Pension and Profit Sharing Plans to the Consolidated Financial Statements). In addition, we had insured claims (see Note 16 – Subsequent Events to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and other pension liabilities of $3.4 million.

In January 2017, we received approximately $1.0 million as part of a settlement concerning, among other things, funds that were being held as collateral by our pre-petition insurance carrier on account of escrows and draws on certain letters of credit. As of December 31, 2017, the amount of remaining multiemployer pension plan claims was $1.7 million (see Note 8 – Pension and Profit Sharing Plans to the Consolidated Financial Statements). In addition, we had other pension liabilities of $2.5 million.

PriorOn January 18, 2018, Syms and certain of its subsidiaries (together, the “Reorganized Debtors”) filed with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) a motion (the “Motion”) for entry of a final decree (the “Final Decree”) (i) closing the chapter 11 cases of the Reorganized Debtors; (ii) terminating the services of the claims and noticing agent; and (iii) retaining the Bankruptcy Court’s jurisdiction as provided for in the Plan, including to enforce or interpret its own orders pertaining to the completion of our payment obligations underchapter 11 cases including, but not limited to, the Plan and Final Decree. On the Plan provided forsame date, the Reorganized Debtors filed a corporate budget composedFinal Report in support of certain operating reservesthe Motion. On February 6, 2018, the Bankruptcy Court entered the Final Decree pursuant to fund working capital and our operations while we operated underwhich the Plan. Followingchapter 11 cases of the General Unsecured Claims Satisfaction, these reserve obligations no longer applied.Reorganized Debtors were closed.

The descriptions of certain transactions, payments and other matters contemplated by the Plan above and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are summaries only and do not purport to be complete and are qualified in all respects by the actual provisions of the Plan and related documents.

Trademarks

Various trademarks are controlled by and/or owned by us, including “Filene’s Basement”®, “Stanley Blacker”®, “Running of the Brides”® and “An Educated Consumer is Our Best Customer,”® and have been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Financial Reporting and Fiscal Year

In response to the Chapter 11 filing, we adopted the liquidation basis of accounting effective October 30, 2011. Under the liquidation basis of accounting, assets are stated at their net realizable value, liabilities are stated at their net settlement amount and estimated costs over the period of liquidation are accrued to the extent reasonably determinable. Effective February 9, 2015, the closing date of the loan transaction described in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources, we ceased reporting on the liquidation basis of accounting in light of our available cash resources, the estimated range of outstanding payments on unresolved claims, and our ability to operate as a going concern. We resumed reporting on the going concern basis of accounting on February 10, 2015. The impact of this change in accounting is discussed below in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Change from Liquidation Accounting to Going Concern Accounting and Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements (Basis of Presentation).

Our fiscal year and that of our predecessor was historically a 52-week or 53-week period ending on the Saturday on or nearest to February 28. On November 12, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a change to a December 31 calendar year end, effective with the year ended December 31, 2015. The 2016 year is based on a calendar year and Fiscal 2015 is based on the period from March 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015.

Employees

As of December 31, 2016,2017, we had eightnine full-time employees and one part time employee staffed in executive, management, finance, accounting, operations and administrative capacities.

General Information about Trinity

Trinity was incorporated in Delaware immediately prior to the effective date of the Plan. Trinity maintains its headquarters at 717 Fifth340 Madison Avenue, New York, New York, 10022,10173, and the telephone number is (212) 235-2190.

Available Information

We are a public company and are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we file periodic reports and other information with the SEC. Such reports and other information may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549 or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding us and other issuers that file electronically.

Our website address iswww.trinityplaceholdings.com orwww.tphs.com. We make available without charge, through our website in the “Financials” section, copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with or furnished to the SEC. References in this document to our website are not and should not be considered part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business, operations and financial condition are subject to various risks. Some of these risks are described below, and stockholders should take such risks into account in evaluating us or any investment decision involving us. This section does not describe all risks that may be applicable to us, our industry or our business, and it is intended only as a summary of certain material risk factors. Additional risks and uncertainties that we do not presently know about or that we currently believe are not material may also adversely affect our business. More detailed information concerning certain of the risk factors described below is contained in other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Stockholders should also refer to the other information contained in our periodic reports, including the Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements section, our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section for a further discussion of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our business.

Risk Factors Related to Our Business

We have a limited operating history and have not generated a profit and consequently our business plan is difficult to evaluate and our long term viability cannot be assured.

Our prospects for financial success are difficult to assess because we have a limited operating history since emergence from bankruptcy and, more recently,we began reporting as a going concern. Our predecessor filed for Chapter 11 relief on November 2, 2011, we were formed, and we emerged from bankruptcy on September 14, 2012. We resumed reporting on the going concern basis of accounting on February 10, 2015. Since emergence from bankruptcy,our formation, we have generated limited revenues and had negative cash flow from operations and theoperations. The development of our business plan will require substantial capital expenditures. Our business could be subject to any or all of the problems, expenses, delays and risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including, but not limited to capital resources. There can be no assurance that our business will be successful, that we will be able to achieve or maintain a profitable operation, or that we will not encounter unforeseen difficulties that may deplete our capital resources more rapidly than anticipated. There can be no assurance that we will achieve or sustain profitability or positive cash flows from our operating activities.

MuchWe have generated minimal revenues from operations and have limited cash resources, and will be reliant on external sources of capital to fund ongoing operations.

Our revenue generating activities have not yet produced sufficient funds for profitable operations. In addition, we are required to set aside specified minimum levels of liquidity in connection with the development and financing of 77 Greenwich, and we anticipate that we may be required to do so in connection with the development and financing of other current and future properties as well. While 77 Greenwich is currently our most significant asset, the amounts required to be set aside in other situations could also be substantial. As a result, these amounts would not be available for investment or operating activities. Our continued operation will be dependent upon the success of future operations and will require raising additional capital on acceptable terms. We have relied and may continue to rely substantially upon equity and debt financing to fund our ongoing operations. There can be no assurance that additional sources of capital will be available to us on commercially favorable terms should our capital requirements exceed cash available from operations and existing cash and cash equivalents.

A significant part of our current business plan is focused on the development of 77 Greenwich, and an inability to execute this business plan due to adverse trends in the Manhattan condominium market or otherwise could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our business plan includes the development or redevelopment of our remaining commercial real estate properties and in particular the development of 77 Greenwich, which currently makes up a majority ofis our assets.largest asset. As a result, our revenues and future growth are heavily dependent on the success of implementing our business plan to developfor 77 Greenwich, which is currently in pre-development. An inability to successfully execute our business plan with respect to 77 Greenwich could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our business plan for 77 Greenwich may be adversely impacted by trends in the Manhattan condominium market.under development.

Our revenues and future growth are partially dependent on the success of monetizing 77 Greenwich, which is currently in pre-development.  Our plans for 77 Greenwich currently call for approximately 90 luxury residential condominium apartments, in addition to retail and a New York City elementary school.  There are a variety of factors that determine Manhattan condominium trends and that will ultimately impact the sales and pricing of condominiums at 77 Greenwich, including among others, supply, changes in interest rates, the availability of home mortgages, foreign exchange rates and local employment trends, prices and velocity of sales. Sales of condominiums in general, and in particular in Manhattan, have historically experienced greater volatility than detached single family houses, which may expose us to more risk.  These and other factors fluctuate over time and their status at the time we actually commence sales, which is itself uncertain, is inherently uncertain. An inability to successfully execute our business plan with respect to 77 Greenwich could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our development of 77 Greenwich is dependent upon our ability to obtain commercially reasonable financing.

Our ability to develop 77 Greenwich depends on our ability to obtain construction financing, permanent financing and/or letters of credit, on commercially reasonable terms. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such financing on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we are unable to obtain sufficient financing on commercially reasonable terms, our ability to develop 77 Greenwich could be materially adversely affected, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our investment in property development for 77 Greenwich and other properties may be more costly than anticipated.

We intend to continue to develop or redevelop our current and future properties. Our current and future development and construction activities, including with respect to 77 Greenwich, may be exposed to the following risks:

Investment returns from our77 Greenwich and other properties planned to be developedwe may develop may be less than anticipated.

Our properties planned to be developed may be exposed to the following risks:

Competition for new acquisitions may reduce the number of acquisition opportunities available to us and increase the costs of those acquisitions.

We may acquire properties when we are presented with attractive opportunities. We may face competition for acquisition opportunities from other investors, particularly those investors who are willing to incur more leverage, and this competition may adversely affect us by subjecting us to the following risks:

If we are unable to successfully acquire additional properties, our ability to grow our business could be adversely affected. In addition, increases in the cost of acquisition opportunities could adversely affect our results of operations.

We face risks associated with acquisitions of and investments in new properties.

We may acquire interests in properties, individual properties and portfolios of properties, including potentially large portfolios that could significantly increase our size and alter our capital structure. Our acquisition and investment activities may be exposed to, and their success may be adversely affected by, the following risks:

In addition, we may acquire properties subject to both known and unknown liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse to the seller. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us arising from our ownership of such a property, we might have to pay substantial sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our cash flow. Unknown liabilities with respect to properties acquired might include:

Our revenues and the value of our portfolio are affected by a number of factors that affect investments in leased commercial and residential real estate generally.

We are subject to the general risks of investing in and owning leased real estate in connection with our existing shopping centers, the residential property owned by our joint venture and new properties or investments in leased real estate. These risks include the ability to secure leases with new tenants, the non-performance of lease obligations by tenants, leasehold improvements that will be costly or difficult to remove or certain upgrades that may be needed should it become necessary to re-rent the leased space for other uses, rights of termination of leases due to events of casualty or condemnation affecting the leased space or the property or due to interruption of the tenant’s quiet enjoyment of the leased premises, and obligations of a landlord to restore the leased premises or the property following events of casualty or condemnation. The occurrence of any of these events, particularly with respect to larger leases at our commercial real estate properties, could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

In addition, if our competitors offer space at rental rates below our current rates or the market rates, we may lose current or potential tenants to other properties in our markets. Additionally, we may need to reduce rental rates below our current rates or offer incentives in order to retain tenants upon expiration of their leases or to attract new tenants. Our results of operations and cash flow may be adversely affected as a result of these factors.

We may be unable to lease vacant space, renew our current leases, or re-lease space as our current leases expire.

We cannot assure you that leases at our properties will be renewed or that such properties will be re-leased at favorable rental rates. If the rental rates for our properties decrease, our tenants do not renew their leases or we do not re-lease a significant portion of our available space, including vacant space resulting from tenant defaults or space that is currently unoccupied, and space for which leases are scheduled to expire, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected. There are numerous commercial developers, real estate companies, financial institutions and other investors with greater financial resources than we have that compete with us in seeking tenants who will lease space in our properties.

The bankruptcy of, or a downturn in the business of, any of the major tenants at our commercial real estate properties that causes them to reject their leases, or to not renew their leases as they expire, or renew at lower rental rates, may adversely affect our cash flows and property values. In addition, retailers at our properties face increasing competition from e-commerce, outlet malls, discount shopping clubs, direct mail and telemarketing, which could reduce rents payable to us and reduce our ability to attract and retain tenants at our properties leading to increased vacancy rates at our properties.

In addition, if we are unable to renew leases or re-lease a property, the resale value of that property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend in part upon the value of the leases of such property.

Competition may adversely affect our ability to purchase properties and make other investments.

Our competitors for new acquisitions and other investments include real estate investment trusts, financial institutions, private funds, insurance companies, pension funds, private companies, family offices, sovereign wealth funds and individuals. Many of our competitors have greater resources, including access to equity capital and debt financing, than we do. This competition may result in a higher cost for properties than we wish to pay.

We are subject to the risks associated with partnerships and joint ventures.

We formed a joint venture betweenwith a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours and an affiliate of Pacolet Milliken Enterprises, Inc.,third party to acquire and operate The Berkley in Brooklyn, New York. We may become involved in additional partnerships and/or joint ventures in the future with respect to current or future properties. Partnerships and joint venture investments may involve risks not otherwise present for investments made or owned solely by us, including the possibility that our partner or co-venturer might become bankrupt, or may take action contrary to our instructions, requests, policies or objectives. Other risks of joint venture investments include impasse on decisions, such as a sale, because neither we nor a joint venture partner would have full control over the joint venture, activities conducted by a partner that have a negative impact on the joint venture or us, and disputes with our partner. Also, there is no limitation under our organizational documents as to the amount of our funds that may be invested in joint ventures.

We may not receive or be able to maintain certain tax benefits if we are not in compliance with certain requirements of the NYC Department of Housing Preservation and Development.

We may not receive or be able to maintain certain existing or anticipated tax benefits related to The Berkley or our pending acquisition of 237 11^th Street if we are not in compliance with certain requirements of the NYC Department of Housing Preservation and Development (the “HPD”). Both of these properties currently benefit from a real estate tax exemption under New York Real Property Tax Law (the “RPTL”) Section 421-a, as a result of a specified percentage of the units in such buildings being designated as affordable rate units or market rate units and/or subject to rent stabilization guidelines, among other requirements. Section 421-a of the New York RPTL provides an exemption from real estate taxes on the amount of the assessed value of newly constructed improvements if certain requirements are met. A property cannot maintain or continue to receive Section 421-a tax benefits without HPD’s determination that all Section 421-a eligibility requirements have and continue to be met. Although the HPD has issued a final Certificate of Eligibility with respect to the 421-a tax benefits for The Berkley property and we are currently in compliance with all applicable 421-a requirements for such property, and the HPD has issued a preliminary Certificate of Eligibility with respect to the 421-a tax benefits for the 237 11th Street property and the seller of the 237 11^th Street property has represented to us that it is complying with all applicable 421-a requirements for such property, there can be no assurance that compliance with the 421-a requirements for either property will continue to be maintained. If we are not able to maintain compliance with the requirements of the Section 421-a partial tax exemption program, as applicable to either of the properties, the HPD may find that such property is ineligible to receive the tax exemption benefits related to the Section 421-a partial tax exemption program.

Our ability to develop or redevelop our properties and enter into new leases with tenants will depend on our obtaining certain permits, site plan approvals and other governmental approvals from local municipalities, which we may not be able to obtain on a timely basis or at all.

In order to develop or redevelop our properties, we will be required to obtain certain permits, site plan approvals or other governmental approvals from local municipalities. We may not be able to secure all the necessary permits or approvals on a timely basis or at all, which may prevent us from developing or redeveloping our properties according to our business plan. Additionally, potential acquirors or tenants may also need to obtain certain permits or approvals in order to utilize our properties in the manner they intend to do so. The specific permit and approval requirements are set by the state and the various local jurisdictions, including but not limited to city, town, county, township and state agencies having control over the specific properties. Lack ofOur inability to obtain permits and approvals to develop or redevelop our properties, or the inability of potential purchasers and tenants of our properties to obtain necessary permits and approvals, could severely and adversely affect our business.

We have generated minimal revenues from operations and have limited cash resources, and may be reliant on external sources of financing to fund operations in the future.

Our revenue generating activities have not yet produced sufficient funds for profitable operations. In addition, we anticipate that we may be required to set aside specified minimum levels of liquidity in connection with the development and financing of current and future properties, including 77 Greenwich. Such amounts could be substantial. As a result, these amounts would not be available for investment or operating activities. Our continued operation will be dependent upon the success of future operations and will likely require raising additional financing on acceptable terms. We have relied and may continue to rely substantially upon equity and debt financing to fund our ongoing operations. There can be no assurance that additional sources of financing would be available to us on commercially favorable terms should our capital requirements exceed cash available from operations and existing cash and cash equivalents.

The loss of key personnel upon whom we depend to operate our business or the inability to attract additional qualified personnel could adversely affect our business.

We believe that our future success will depend in large part on our ability to retain or attract highly qualified management and other personnel, including in particular our President and Chief Executive Officer, Matthew Messinger. We may not be successful in retaining key personnel or in attracting other highly qualified personnel. Any inability to retain or attract qualified management and other personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The failure of our subsidiaries to repay or refinance outstanding loans, and any liability we incur as a result of the financing arrangements and our guarantees of those loans, could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

All of our properties secure loan agreements that our subsidiaries have entered into. The failure by the borrower subsidiaries to make scheduled repayments under the loan agreements, or the default of any of the obligations under the loans, would have an adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the applicable subsidiary may be required to immediately repay all amounts outstanding under the respective loan and the lenders may exercise other remedies available to them, including foreclosing on the respective property securing the loan. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources and Note 10 – Loans Payable to our consolidated financial statements, for further discussion regarding each loan transaction.

Our ability to utilize our NOLs to reduce future tax payments may be limited as a result of future transactions.

We had approximately $230.2 million of federal NOLs at December 31, 2016. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code, contains rules that limit the ability of a company that undergoes an ownership change, which is generally any change in ownership by certain stockholders of more than 50% of its stock over a three-year period, to utilize its NOLs after the ownership change. These rules generally operate by focusing on ownership changes involving stockholders who directly or indirectly own 5% or more of the stock of a company and any change in ownership arising from a new issuance of stock by us. Generally, if an ownership change occurs, the annual taxable income limitation on the use of NOLs is equal to the product of the applicable long term tax exempt rate and the value of our stock immediately before the ownership change. If we experience an ownership change, our ability to utilize our NOLs would be subject to significant limitations.

Political and economic uncertainty could have an adverse effect on us.

We cannot predict how current political and economic uncertainty, including uncertainty related to taxation, will affect our critical tenants, joint venture partners, lenders, financial institutions and general economic conditions, including the health and confidence of the consumer and the volatility of the stock market.

Political and economic uncertainty poses a risk to us in that it may cause consumers to postpone discretionary spending in response to tighter credit, reduced consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer spending behavior, resulting in a downturn in the business of our tenants. In the event current political and economic uncertainty results in financial turmoil affecting the banking system and financial markets or significant financial service institution failures, there could be a new or incremental tightening in the credit markets, low liquidity, and extreme volatility in fixed income, credit, currency and equity markets. Each of these could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We may incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws and environmental contamination may impair our ability to lease and/or sell real estate.

Our operations and properties are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the protection of the environment, including air and water quality, hazardous or toxic substances and health and safety. Under some environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances released at a property. The owner or operator may also be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage or personal injuries and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by those parties because of the contamination. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of the release of the substances or caused the release. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination may impair our ability to sell or lease real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. Other laws and regulations govern indoor and outdoor air quality including those that can require the abatement or removal of asbestos-containing materials in the event of damage, demolition, renovation or remodeling and also govern emissions of and exposure to asbestos fibers in the air. The maintenance and removal of lead paint and certain electrical equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are also regulated by federal and state laws. We are also subject to risks associated with human exposure to chemical or biological contaminants such as molds, pollens, viruses and bacteria which, above certain levels, can be alleged to be connected to allergic or other health effects and symptoms in susceptible individuals. We could incur fines for environmental compliance and be held liable for the costs of remedial action with respect to the foregoing regulated substances or related claims arising out of environmental contamination or human exposure to contamination at or from our properties.

Each of our properties has been subject to varying degrees of environmental assessment. To date, these environmental assessments have not revealed any environmental condition material to our business. However, identification of new compliance concerns or undiscovered areas of contamination, changes in the extent or known scope of contamination, human exposure to contamination or changes in clean-up or compliance requirements could result in significant costs to us.

Breaches of information technology systems could materially harm our business and reputation.

We collect and retain on information technology systems certain financial, personal and other sensitive information provided by third parties, including tenants, vendors and employees. We also rely on information technology systems for the collection and distribution of funds.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information or the unauthorized distribution of funds. Any loss of this information or unauthorized distribution of funds as a result of a breach of information technology systems may result in loss of funds to which we are entitled, legal liability and costs (including damages and penalties), as well as damage to our reputation, that could materially and adversely affect our business and financial performance.

Compliance or failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act or other safety regulations and requirements could result in substantial costs.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) generally requires that public buildings, including our properties, meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons.  These rules are subject to interpretation and change. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or the award of damages to private litigants and/or legal fees to their counsel. If, under the ADA, we are required to make substantial alterations and capital expenditures in one or more of our operating properties, including the removal of access barriers, it could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life safety requirements.  If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could incur fines or private damage awards.  We do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated expenditures that will affect our cash flow and results of operations.

The loss of key personnel upon whom we depend to operate our business or the inability to attract additional qualified personnel could adversely affect our business.

We believe that our future success will depend in large part on our ability to retain or attract highly qualified management and other personnel, including in particular our President and Chief Executive Officer, Matthew Messinger. We may not be successful in retaining key personnel or in attracting other highly qualified personnel. Any inability to retain or attract qualified management and other personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The failure of our subsidiaries to repay or refinance outstanding loans, and any liability we incur as a result of the financing arrangements and our guarantees of those loans, could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

All of our properties secure loan agreements. The failure by our borrower subsidiaries to make scheduled repayments under the loan agreements, or the default of any of the obligations under the loans, would have an adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the applicable subsidiary may be required to immediately repay all amounts outstanding under the respective loan and the lenders may exercise other remedies available to them, including foreclosing on the respective property securing the loan. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources and Note 10 – Loans Payable and secured line of credit to our consolidated financial statements, for further discussion regarding our financing activities.

New U.S. tax laws.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law. This law imposes significant changes on the way we are taxed, including, among other things, changes to U.S. federal tax rates, imposing significant additional limitations on the deductibility of interest, and the migration to a new international system of taxation. There is substantial uncertainty regarding both the timing and the details of how these changes will affect us and the industry in which we operate.

Our ability to utilize our NOLs to reduce future tax payments may be limited as a result of future transactions.

We had approximately $231.0 million of federal NOLs at December 31, 2017. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code, contains rules that limit the ability of a company that undergoes an ownership change, which is generally any change in ownership by certain stockholders of more than 50% of its stock over a three-year period, to utilize its NOLs after the ownership change. These rules generally operate by focusing on ownership changes involving stockholders who directly or indirectly own 5% or more of the stock of a company and any change in ownership arising from a new issuance of stock by us. Generally, if an ownership change occurs, the annual taxable income limitation on the use of NOLs is equal to the product of the applicable long term tax exempt rate and the value of our stock immediately before the ownership change. If we experience an ownership change, our ability to utilize our NOLs would be subject to significant limitations.

Political and economic uncertainty could have an adverse effect on us.

We cannot predict how current political and economic uncertainty, including uncertainty related to taxation and increases in interest rates, will affect our critical tenants, joint venture partners, lenders, financial institutions and general economic conditions, including consumer confidence and the volatility of the stock market and real estate market.

Political and economic uncertainty poses a risk to us in that it may cause consumers to postpone discretionary spending in response to tighter credit, reduced consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer spending behavior, resulting in a downturn in the business of our tenants. In the event current political and economic uncertainty results in financial turmoil affecting the banking system and financial markets or significant financial service institution failures, there could be a new or incremental tightening in the credit markets, low liquidity, and extreme volatility in fixed income, credit, currency and equity markets. Each of these could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Breaches of information technology systems could materially harm our business and reputation.

We collect and retain on information technology systems certain financial, personal and other sensitive information provided by third parties, including tenants, vendors and employees. We also rely on information technology systems for the collection and distribution of funds.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information or the unauthorized distribution of funds. Any loss of this information or unauthorized distribution of funds as a result of a breach of information technology systems may result in loss of funds to which we are entitled, legal liability and costs (including damages and penalties), as well as damage to our reputation, that could materially and adversely affect our business and financial performance.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Our common stock is thinly traded and the price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.

Our common stock, is listed on the NYSE MKT. Our common stockAmerican, is thinly traded. We cannot assure stockholders that an active market for our common stock will develop in the foreseeable future or, if developed, that it will be sustained. As a result stockholders may not be able to resell their common stock. Because our common stock is thinly traded, even small trades can have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock. Volatility in the market price of our common stock may prevent stockholders from being able to sell their shares at or above the price paid for such shares. The market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly for various reasons, many of which are beyond our control, including:

In addition, until our common stock is more widely held and actively traded, small sales or purchases may cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate dramatically up or down without regard to our financial health or business prospects.

Stockholders may experience dilution of their ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of our common stock.

In the future, we may issue additional equity securities in capital raising transactions or otherwise, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of our present stockholders. We are currently authorized to issue an aggregate of 120,000,000 shares of capital stock consisting of 79,999,997 shares of common stock, two shares of a class of preferred stock (which were redeemed in accordance with their terms and may not be reissued), one share of a class of special stock and 40,000,000 shares of blank-check preferred stock. As of December 31, 2017, there were 31,451,796 shares of our common stock and one share of special stock outstanding.

Any future issuance of our equity securities may dilute then-current stockholders’ ownership percentages and could also result in a decrease in the fair market value of our equity securities, because our assets would be owned by a larger pool of outstanding equity. We may need to raise additional capital through public or private offerings of our common stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our common stock. We may also issue such securities in connection with hiring or retaining employees and consultants, as payment to providers of goods and services, in connection with future acquisitions and investments, development, redevelopment and repositioning of assets, or for other business purposes. Our board of directors may at any time authorize the issuance of additional common stock without stockholder approval, unless the approval of our common stockholders is required by applicable law, rule or regulation, including NYSE American regulations, or our certificate of incorporation. The terms of preferred equity securities we may issue in future transactions may be more favorable to new investors, and may include dividend and/or liquidation preferences, superior voting rights and the issuance of warrants or other derivative securities, which may have a further dilutive effect. Also, the future issuance of any such additional shares of common stock or other securities may create downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock. There can be no assurance that any such future issuances will not be at a price or have exercise prices below the price at which shares of the common stock are then traded.

A sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline and may impair our ability to raise capital in the future.

FinanceCapital-raising transactions resulting in a large amount of newly issued shares that become readily tradable, or other events that cause current stockholders to sell shares, could place downward pressure on the trading price of our stock. In addition, the lack of a robust resale market may require a stockholder who desires to sell a large number of shares of common stock to sell the shares in increments over time to mitigate any adverse impact of the sales on the market price of our stock.

If our stockholders sell, or the market perceives that our stockholders intend to sell for various reasons, including the ending of restrictions on resale of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, the market price of our common stock could fall. A significant amount of restricted shares previously issued by us have been registered for resale on registration statements filed with the SEC, and we agreed to file a resale registration statement with the SEC with respect to the shares purchased from us and certain selling shareholders in connection with the private placement in February 2017.SEC.

In addition, sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate. In addition, untilappropriate, which would impair our common stock is more widely held and actively traded, small sales or purchases will likely cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate dramatically up or down without regard to our financial health or business prospects.

Stockholders may experience dilution of their ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of our common stock.

In the future, we may issue additional equity securities in capital raising transactions or otherwise, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of our present stockholders. We are currently authorized to issue an aggregate of 120,000,000 shares of capital stock consisting of 79,999,997 shares of common stock, two shares of a class of preferred stock (which have been redeemed in accordance with their terms and may not be reissued), one share of a class of special stock and 40,000,000 shares of blank-check preferred stock. As of December 31, 2016, there were 25,663,820 shares of our common stock and one share of special stock outstanding and, subsequent to year-end, we issued an additional 3,585,000 shares of common stock in a private placement that closed in February 2017.

Any future issuance of our equity securities may dilute then-current stockholders’ ownership percentages and could also result in a decrease in the fair market value of our equity securities, because our assets would be owned by a larger pool of outstanding equity. We may needability to raise additional capital through public or private offerings of our common stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our common stock. We may also issue such securities in connection with hiring or retaining employees and consultants, as payment to providers of goods and services, in connection with future acquisitions and investments, development, redevelopment and repositioning of assets, or for other business purposes. Our board of directors may at any time authorize the issuance of additional common stock without stockholder approval, unless the approval of our common stockholders is required by applicable law, rule or regulation, including NYSE MKT regulations, or our certificate of incorporation. The terms of preferred equity securities we may issue in future transactions may be more favorable to new investors, and may include dividend and/or liquidation preferences, superior voting rights and the issuance of warrants or other derivative securities, which may have a further dilutive effect. Also, the future issuance of any such additional shares of common stock or other securities may create downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock. There can be no assurance that any such future issuances will not be at a price or have exercise prices below the price at which shares of the common stock are then traded.capital.

OverMore than 50% of our shares of common stock are currently controlled by fourfive of our stockholders who may have the ability to influence the election of directors and the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders.

OverMore than 50% of our shares of common stock are controlled by fourfive of our stockholders. As a result, these stockholders may have the ability to significantly influence the outcome of issues submitted to our stockholders.stockholders for a vote. The interests of these stockholders may not always coincide with our interests or the interests of other stockholders, and they may act in a manner that advances their best interests and not necessarily those of other stockholders. The concentration of ownership could also deter unsolicited takeovers, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices.

The holder of our special stock has the right to appoint a member to our board of directors and, consequently, the ability to exert influence over us.

In connection with the investment in us by Third Avenue Trust, on behalf of Third Avenue Real Estate Value Fund (“Third Avenue”), a beneficial holder of 16.3%15.56% of our common stock, Third Avenue was issued one share of a class of special stock and our certificate of incorporation was amended to provide that, subject to the other terms and conditions of our certificate of incorporation, from the issuance of the one share of special stock and until the “Special Stock Ownership Threshold” of 2,345,000 shares of common stock is no longer satisfied, Third Avenue has the right to elect one director to the board of directors. As a result, this stockholder may be able to exert influence over our policies and management, potentially in a manner which may not be in our best interests or the best interests of the other stockholders, until such time as the Special Stock Ownership Threshold is no longer satisfied.

In order to protect our ability to utilize our NOLs and certain other tax attributes, our certificate of incorporation includes certain transfer restrictions with respect to our stock, which may limit the liquidity of our common stock.

To reduce the risk of a potential adverse effect on our ability to use our NOLs and certain other tax attributes for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, our certificate of incorporation contains certain transfer restrictions with respect to our stock by substantial stockholders. These restrictions may adversely affect the ability of certain holders of our common stock to dispose of or acquire shares of our common stock and may have an adverse impact on the liquidity of our stock generally.

We have not paid dividends on our common stock in the past and do not expect to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any return on investment may be limited to the value of our common stock.

No cash dividends have been paid on our common stock. We expect that any income received from operations will be devoted to our future operations and growth. We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the near future. Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our profitability at the time, cash available for those dividends, and such other factors as our board of directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because a return on an investor’s investment will only occur if our stock price appreciates.

Our charter documents and Delaware law could prevent a takeover that stockholders consider favorable and could also reduce the market price of our stock.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change in control of us. These provisions could also make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. In addition to the matters identified in the risk factors above relating to the provisions of our certificate of incorporation, these provisions include:

These and other provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and under Delaware law could discourage potential takeover attempts, reduce the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of common stock and result in the market price of the common stock being lower than it would be without these provisions.

None.

Below is certain information regarding our commercial real estate properties as of December 31, 2016:2017:

(1)77 Greenwich. We are currently in the development stage for the development of an over 300,000 gross square foot mixed-use building that corresponds to the approximate total of 233,000 zoning square feet. The plans call for the development of approximately 90 luxury residential condominium apartments, 7,500 square feet of street level retail space, a 476-seat elementary school serving New York City District 2, includes the adaptive reuse of the landmarked Robert and Anne Dickey House, and construction of a new handicapped accessible subway entrance on Trinity Place. The school project has obtained city council and mayoral approval. Environmental remediation and demolition was completed in the third quarter of 2017, and excavation and foundation work has begun. On December 22, 2017, we closed on a $189.5 million construction loan. We will draw down proceeds available to us under the construction loan as costs related to the construction are incurred over the next few years. We currently anticipate that the proceeds available under the construction loan, together with equity funded by us to date and future contributions by the New York City School Construction Authority (“SCA”), will be sufficient to finance the construction and development of 77 Greenwich without us making any further equity contributions. (see Note 10 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit for further information).

Through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we also entered into an agreement with the SCA, whereby we will construct a school that will be sold to the SCA as part of our condominium development at the 77 Greenwich property. Pursuant to the agreement, the SCA will pay us $41.5 million which has been allocated to land and reimburse us for the costs associated with constructing the school (including a construction supervision fee of approximately $5.0 million). Payments for construction will be made by the SCA to the general contractor in installments as construction on their condominium progresses. Payments for the land and development fee will be received starting in January 2018 through September 2019. Upon Substantial Completion, as defined, the SCA shall purchase the school condominium unit. We are required to substantially complete construction of the school by September 6, 2023. To secure our obligations, the 77 Greenwich property has been ground leased to the SCA and leased back to us until title to the school is transferred to the SCA. We have also guaranteed certain obligations with respect to the construction. The condominium apartments along with the subway improvements are currently scheduled to be completed by year end 2020.

(2)Paramus Property. The Paramus property consists of a one-story and partial two-story, 73,000 square foot freestanding building and an outparcel building of approximately 4,000 square feet, for approximately 77,000 total square feet of rentable space. The primary building is comprised of approximately 47,000 square feet of ground floor space, and two separate mezzanine levels of approximately 21,000 and 5,000 square feet. The 73,000 square foot building was leased pursuant to a short-term license agreement to Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: RH) (“Restoration Hardware”) from October 15, 2015 to February 29, 2016 when the tenant vacated the property. Subsequently, we entered into a new twelve month license agreement with Restoration Hardware that began on June 1, 2016, which is terminable upon one month’s notice to the other party, and which has since been extended to end on March 31, 2019. The outparcel building is leased to a tenant whose lease expires on March 31, 2019. The tenant has been in the space since 1996. The land area of the Paramus property consists of approximately 292,000 square feet, or approximately 6.7 acres. We have entered into an option agreement with Carmax (NYSE:KMX), pursuant to which Carmax will construct a new building after we obtain approvals and demolish the existing buildings. The option agreement includes a fully negotiated lease agreement. This transaction is subject to town approvals based on the potential tenant’s intended use of the site.

(3)West Palm Beach Property. The West Palm Beach property consists of a one-story neighborhood retail strip center that is comprised of approximately 112,000 square feet of rentable area, which includes three outparcel locations with approximately 11,000 combined square feet. The land area of the West Palm Beach property consists of approximately 515,000 square feet, or approximately 11.8 acres. Our redevelopment and repositioning of the center is complete. We will incur additional lease-up costs as the current vacancies are filled. Our two largest tenants are Walmart Marketplace, with 41,662 square feet of space and Tire Kingdom, a national credit tenant who took possession of a 5,400 square feet outparcel.

(4)223 North 8^th Street. Through a joint venture with Pacolet Milliken Enterprises, Inc., we own a 50% interest in the entity formed to acquire and operate The Berkley, a newly constructed 95-unit multi-family property encompassing approximately 99,000 gross square feet (65,000 rentable square feet) on 223 North 8^th Street in North Williamsburg, Brooklyn, New York. The Berkley is in close proximity to public transportation and offers a full amenity package. Apartments feature top-of-the-line unit finishes, central air conditioning and heating and most units have private outdoor space. The property benefits from a 25-year 421-a real estate tax exemption.

Lease Expirations

The following chart shows the tenancy, by year of lease expiration, of our retail properties for all tenants in place as of December 31, 2016,2017, excluding the license agreementsagreement with Restoration Hardware ($(dollars in 000’s)thousands):

Corporate Headquarters

We lease our corporate headquarters in New York, New York (approximately 3,5006,271 square feet). The lease expires in September 2017.March 2025.

We are a party to routine legal proceedings, which are primarily incidental to our former business. Some of the actions to which we are a party are covered by insurance and are being defended or reimbursed by our insurance carriers. Based on an analysis performed by our actuary and available information and taking into account accruals where they have been established, management currently believes that any liabilities ultimately resulting from this routine litigation will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Additionally, as discussed in Item 1. Business, we currently operate underon January 18, 2018, the Reorganized Debtors filed with the Bankruptcy Court a motion (the “Motion”) for entry of the Final Decree (i) closing the chapter 11 cases of the Reorganized Debtors; (ii) terminating the services of the claims and noticing agent; and (iii) retaining the Bankruptcy Court’s jurisdiction as provided for in the Plan, that was approvedincluding to enforce or interpret its own orders pertaining to the chapter 11 cases including, but not limited to, the Plan and Final Decree. On the same date, the Reorganized Debtors filed a Final Report in connection with the resolutionsupport of the ChapterMotion. On February 6, 2018, the Bankruptcy Court entered the Final Decree pursuant to which the chapter 11 cases involving Syms and its subsidiaries.of the Reorganized Debtors were closed.

Not applicable.

PART II

On December 21, 2015 our common stock began trading on the NYSE MKT. Prior to this, our common stock was quoted in the OTCQB.American. The trading symbol of our common stock is “TPHS”.

The following table summarizes the quarterly high and low sales prices per share of the common stock as reported in the NYSE MKTAmerican for the quarterly periods for the yearyears ended December 31, 2016. For the period from March 1, 2015 through2017 and December 31, 2015, the table summarizes the quarterly high2016, respectively.

Outstanding Common Stock and low bid quotations prices per shareHolders

As of theMarch 15, 2018, we had 36,984,753 shares issued and 31,554,643 shares outstanding and there were approximately 177 record holders of our common stock as reported in the OTCQB for the period from March 1, 2015 until December 18, 2015 and the high and low sales prices as reported by the NYSE MKT for the period from December 21, 2015 through December 31, 2015. The OTCQB quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.stock.

Outstanding Common Stock and Holders

As of March 15, 2017, we had 34,444,923 shares issued and 29,343,441 shares outstanding and there were approximately 212 record holders of our common stock.

Dividends

No dividends were paid during either of the yearyears ended December 31, 2016 or the periods from February 10, 2015 to February 28, 20152017 and March 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015.2016.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

In accordance with the terms of the employment agreement between us and Matthew Messinger, our President and Chief Executive Officer, on December 29, 2016,2017, Mr. Messinger was granted 30,000 restricted stock unit awards (the “RSU Awards”). The issuance of the RSU Awards was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

We made nodid not repurchase any stock repurchases during the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.

Performance Graph

The following graph is a comparison of the cumulative return of our shares of common stock from October 2, 2012 (the first date following our emergence from bankruptcy that our common stock was quoted)January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2016,2017, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “S&P 500 Index”) and the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts’ (“NAREIT”) All Equity Index, a peer group index. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on September 14, 2012January 1, 2013 in our shares of common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the NAREIT All Equity Index and assumes the reinvestment of all dividends (if applicable), and that no commissions were paid. There can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below.

The following table sets forth our selected financial data and should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The below selected financial data does not include any information prior to February 10, 2015 as we were reporting on the liquidation basis of accounting during the periods prior to February 10, 2015. Under the liquidation basis of accounting, assets are stated at their net realizable value, liabilities are stated at their net settlement amount and estimated costs over the period of liquidation are accrued to the extent reasonably determinable. Our accounting basis reverted to the going concern basis of accounting on February 10, 2015, resulting in all remaining assets and liabilities at that date being adjusted to their net book value less an adjustment for depreciation and/or amortization calculated from the date we entered liquidation through the date we emerged from liquidation. Accordingly, this change in accounting basis resulted in a decrease in the reporting basis of the respective assets and liabilities. Also on November 12, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a change to our fiscal year end from the Saturday closest to the last day of February to a December 31 calendar year end, effective with the year ended December 31, 2015. The period that resulted from this change is March 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. Because the bases of accounting are non-comparable to each other as well as due to the change in our fiscal year, we are not reporting selected financial data for the periods prior to February 10, 2015.

The following discussion related to our consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements appearing in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

Trinity Place Holdings Inc. (referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as “Trinity,” “we,” “our,”(“Trinity”, “we”, “our”, or “us”) is a real estate holding, investment and asset management company. Our business is primarily to own,acquire, invest in, own, manage, develop or redevelop and sell real estate assets and/or real estate related securities. Currently,

Transactions, Development and Other Activities During 2017

77 Greenwich

Environmental remediation and demolition was completed in the third quarter of 2017, and excavation and foundation work has begun. On December 22, 2017, we entered into a $189.5 million construction loan agreement. We will draw down proceeds available to us as costs related to the construction are incurred for 77 Greenwich over the next few years, in addition to equity already funded by us and future contributions by the SCA. In conjunction with the closing of the construction loan, we repaid in full the outstanding balance, including accrued interest, of our largest assetloan from Sterling National Bank in the aggregate amount of $40.1 million. The balance outstanding under this new construction loan agreement was $32.3 million at December 31, 2017 and $36.5 million at February 28, 2018.

Through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we also entered into an agreement with the SCA, whereby we will construct a school that will be sold to the SCA as part of our condominium development at the 77 Greenwich property. Pursuant to the agreement, the SCA will pay us $41.5 million which has been allocated to land and reimburse us for the costs associated with constructing the school (including a construction supervision fee of approximately $5.0 million). Payments for construction will be made by the SCA to the general contractor in installments as construction on their condominium progresses. Payments for the land and development fee will be received starting in January 2018 through September 2019. Upon Substantial Completion, as defined, the SCA shall purchase the school condominium unit. We are required to substantially complete construction of the school by September 6, 2023. To secure our obligations, the 77 Greenwich property has been ground leased to the SCA and leased back to us until title to the school is transferred to the SCA. We have also guaranteed certain obligations with respect to the construction. The condominium apartments along with the subway improvements are currently scheduled to be completed by year end 2020.

Although there can be no assurances, we currently anticipate that the proceeds available under the construction loan, together with equity funded by us to date and future contributions by the SCA, will be sufficient to finance the construction and development of 77 Greenwich without us making any further equity contributions.

Acquisitions and Divestitures

On September 8, 2017, we entered into an agreement pursuant to which we acquired an option to purchase a newly built 105-unit, 12 story apartment building located at 237 11th Street, Brooklyn, New York for a purchase price of $81.0 million.  We exercised the option on March 9, 2018. We paid an initial deposit of $8.1 million upon entering into the agreement. The purchase price will be funded through acquisition financing and cash on hand. Following the closing and pursuant to a separate agreement, an affiliate of the seller may continue to manage and promote the 237 11^th Street property for a limited period and an affiliate of such manager will have the ability to receive an additional payment based on the performance of the property as it relates to revenues and concessions and other expenses during such period, which is currently estimated to be up to approximately 1% of the purchase price. The acquisition of the 237 11^th Street property, which is subject to customary closing conditions, is expected to close in the spring of 2018.

In August 2017, we sold our property located in Westbury, New York for a gross sale price of $16.0 million. The sale resulted in a gain of $3.9 million and generated approximately $15.2 million in net proceeds to us.

Equity Transactions

On February 14, 2017, we issued an aggregate of 3,585,000 shares of common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $7.50 per share, and received gross proceeds of $26.9 million (the “Private Placement”). On April 5, 2017, we issued an aggregate of 1,884,564 shares of common stock in a rights offering at a purchase price of $7.50 per share and received gross proceeds of $14.1 million (the “Rights Offering”). We have been using the proceeds from the private placement and the Rights Offering for the development of 77 Greenwich, Street (“77 Greenwich”)potential new real estate acquisitions and investment opportunities and for working capital.

Secured Debt Transactions

On February 22, 2017, we entered into two secured lines of credit for an aggregate of $12.0 million, with Sterling National Bank as the lender, which were secured by our properties located in Lower Manhattan. Paramus, New Jersey, and Westbury, New York, respectively, and had an original maturity date of February 22, 2018. On August 4, 2017, in connection with the sale of the Westbury, New York property, the $2.9 million line of credit that was secured by this property, and which was undrawn, matured on that date. The $9.1 million line of credit, which is secured by the Paramus, New Jersey property, was increased to $11.0 million in September 2017, and we extended the maturity date to February 22, 2019. The line of credit bears interest, for drawn amounts only, at 100 basis points over Prime (as defined in the loan agreement), with a floor of 3.75%, and is pre-payable at any time without penalty. As of December 31, 2017 and March 15, 2018, this line of credit was undrawn and the full $11 million was available.

Other Developments/Redevelopments

We also ownextended short-term lease and license agreements with our retail tenants at our Paramus property in order to mitigate our carry costs while we evaluate a retail strip center locatedvariety of opportunities.

Results of Operations

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2016

The discussion below includes revenue and expenses from the Westbury, New York property as of May 8, 2017 when the property was classified as an asset held for sale through its date of sale on August 4, 2017. In prior periods, this property’s revenues and expenses were capitalized as the property was considered as real estate under development.

Rental revenues were relatively flat for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, at $1.3 million. Tenant reimbursements increased by $34,000 to $575,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $541,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in tenant reimbursements was mainly due to increased tenancy for the full year in 2017 as compared to 2016 at the West Palm Beach, Florida and former retail properties inproperty, as well as the inclusion of the revenues at the Westbury, New York property, partially offset by the reconciliation of real estate tax recoveries in 2016 for certain tenants whose leases commenced in 2015.

Property operating expenses increased by $109,000 to $733,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $624,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. These amounts consisted of costs incurred for maintenance and Paramus,repairs, utilities and general operating expenses at our West Palm Beach, Florida property and the Westbury, New Jersey. ThroughYork property. The increase was mainly due to the increased tenancy at the West Palm Beach, Florida property and the inclusion of the Westbury, New York property.

Real estate tax expense increased by $192,000 to $467,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $275,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase related to increased real estate taxes at the West Palm Beach, Florida property and inclusion of the Westbury, New York property.

General and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $1.6 million to $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from approximately $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately $1.1 million related to stock-based compensation, $2.0 million related to payroll and payroll related expenses, $1.7 million related to other corporate costs including board fees, corporate office rent and insurance and $1.0 million related to legal, accounting and other professional fees. For the year ended December 31, 2016, approximately $2.8 million related to stock-based compensation, $1.6 million related to payroll and payroll related expenses, $1.5 million related to other corporate costs including board fees, corporate office rent and insurance and $1.5 million related to legal, accounting and other professional fees. The overall decrease of approximately $1.6 million is mainly a result of a $1.7 million reduction in stock-based compensation related to restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that were granted in the first quarter of 2016, which included 99,000 RSU grants that vested immediately.

Transaction related costs decreased by $160,000 to $83,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $243,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. These costs represent professional fees and other costs incurred in connection with formation activities and the underwriting and evaluation of potential acquisitions and investments for deals that were not consummated. The decrease is also due to the adoption of a new accounting standard in 2017 that provides for the capitalization of costs relating to acquisitions that were expensed prior to January 1, 2017 (see Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Accounting Standards Update).

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately $87,000 to $544,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from approximately $457,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately $246,000 related to depreciation for the West Palm Beach, Florida property, approximately $3,000 related to computers and furniture and fixtures, and approximately $295,000 related to the amortization of trademarks and lease commissions. For the year ended December 31, 2016, approximately $205,000 related to depreciation for the West Palm Beach, Florida property and approximately $252,000 related to the amortization of trademarks and lease commissions. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016 was primarily attributable to depreciation commencing in June 2016 when the assets relating to redevelopment at the West Palm Beach, Florida location were placed in service.

Costs relating to demolished assets for the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $3.4 million. This related to the 77 Greenwich property’s acceleration of depreciation of the building and building improvements and the demolition costs at 77 Greenwich which was accelerated due to the completion of demolition of the 57,000 square foot six-story commercial building in 2017.

Operating loss increased by approximately $2.0 million to $9.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as a result of the changes in revenues and operating expenses as described above.

Equity in net loss from unconsolidated joint venture we own aincreased by approximately $749,000 to $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to approximately $308,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. This represents our 50% interestshare in athe joint venture of the newly constructed 95-unit multi-family property known as The Berkley, located in Brooklyn, New York (see Item 2. Properties for a more detailed descriptionpurchased on December 5, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2017 our share of the loss is primarily comprised of operating income before depreciation of $1.2 million offset by depreciation and amortization of $1.5 million, interest expense of $726,000 and other expenses of $6,000. For the year ended December 31, 2016 our properties). We also continueshare of the loss is primarily due to evaluate new investment opportunities.one-time transaction related costs of $198,000 and depreciation and amortization of $110,000.

We also controlInterest income, net increased by approximately $173,000 to $215,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from approximately $42,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2017, there was approximately $2.5 million of gross interest incurred, all of which was capitalized, and $215,000 of interest income. For the year ended December 31, 2016, there was approximately $2.1 million of gross interest incurred, of which there was approximately $1.9 million of capitalized interest, and $223,000 of interest income. The increase in interest income, net, for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $173,000 is primarily attributable to a varietyhigher percent of intellectual property assets focused oncapitalized interest for the consumer sector, including our on-line marketplace at FilenesBasement.com, our rightsyear ended December 31, 2017 compared to the Stanley Blacker® brand, as well as the intellectual property associated with the Running of the Brides® event and An Educated Consumer is Our Best Customer® slogan. We also had approximately $230.2 million of federal net operating losses (“NOLs”) atyear ended December 31, 2016.

As described in greater detail in Item 1. Business, the predecessor to Trinity is Syms Corp. (“Syms”). Syms and its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 in the United States Bankruptcy CourtInterest expense - amortization of deferred finance costs were $0 for the Districtyear ended December 31, 2017 compared to $98,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2017, all $742,000 of Delaware (the “Court”) in 2011. In August 2012, the Court entered an order confirming the Syms Planamortization of Reorganization. In September 2012, the Plan became effective and the Debtors consummated their reorganization under Chapter 11 through a series of transactions contemplated by the Plan and emerged from bankruptcy. As part of those transactions, reorganized Syms merged with and into Trinity, with Trinity as the surviving corporation and successor issuer pursuantdebt issuance costs were capitalized to Rule 12g-3 under the Exchange Act.

From the effective date of the Plan in 2012 through the date the General Unsecured Claims Satisfaction occurred, our business plan was historically focused on the monetization of our commercial real estate properties, includingunder development. For the development of 77 Greenwich, and the payment of approved claims in accordance with the terms of the Plan. During the period from the effective date of the Plan throughyear ended December 31, 2016, we sold 14 properties, including one condominium, and paid approximately $116.2$345,000 of the $443,000 of amortization was capitalized to real estate under development.

We recorded an adjustment to our claims liability for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $1.0 million in respectdue to the settlement with our insurance carrier. We recorded an adjustment to our claims liability for the year ended December 31, 2016 of approved claims, including$132,000 which was due mainly to the final payment topositive settlement of the former Majority Shareholder liability.

Gain on March 14, 2016sale of real estate for the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $3.9 million due to the sale of the Westbury, New York property on August 4, 2017 which generated approximately $15.2 million in the amountnet proceeds. No properties were sold during 2016.

We recorded an income tax benefit of approximately $6.9$3.1 million which followedfor the occurrenceyear ended December 31, 2017. This was due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”) whereby Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) credit carryforwards will be eligible for a General Unsecured Claims Satisfaction on or about March 8,50% refund through tax years 2018 through 2020. Beginning in tax year 2021, any remaining AMT credit carryforwards would be 100% refundable. As a result of these new regulations, we have released our valuation allowance of $3.1 million formerly reserved against our AMT credit carryforwards. We recorded approximately $26,000 in tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2016. As of

Net loss available to common stockholders decreased by $5.4 million to $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as a result of the amountchanges in revenue and expenses detailed above.

Results of remaining multiemployer pension plan claims was $2.5 million (see Note 8 – Pension and Profit Sharing PlansOperations for the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to the Consolidated Financial Statements). In addition, we had insured claims (see Note 16 – Subsequent EventsTen-Month Period from March 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015

Our fiscal year and that of our predecessor was historically a 52-week or 53-week period ending on the Saturday on or nearest to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and other pension liabilities of $3.4 million.

February 28. On November 12, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a change to our fiscal year end from the Saturday closest to the last day of February to a December 31 calendar year end, effective with the year endingended December 31, 2015. The transition period that resulted from this change was March 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. Because the bases of accounting are non-comparable to each other as well as due to the change in our fiscal year, we are excluding all information from the period prior to February 10, 2015 from any disclosure or discussion.

Change from Liquidation Accounting to Going Concern Accounting

In response to the Chapter 11 filing we adopted the liquidation basis of accounting on October 30, 2011. Under the liquidation basis of accounting, assets are stated at their net realizable value, liabilities are stated at their net settlement amount and estimated costs over the period of liquidation are accrued to the extent reasonably determinable. On February 10, 2015, we changed our basis of accounting from the liquidation basis to the going concern basis of accounting. Accordingly, our accounting basis for real estate and trademark assets were adjusted to their net book values at the date we changed back to the going concern basis of accounting, adjusted for depreciation and amortization calculated from the date we entered liquidation through the date we emerged from liquidation. This change in accounting basis resulted in a decrease in the reporting basis of the respective assets and liabilities.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts in our consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. A summary of our significant accounting policies is presented in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in our consolidated financial statements. Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements included in this report. Certain of the accounting policies used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are particularly important for an understanding of the financial position and results of operations presented in the historical consolidated financial statements included in this report and require the application of significant judgment by management and, as a result, are subject to a degree of uncertainty.

Critical Accounting Policies

As noted above, we resumed reporting on the going concern basis of accounting on February 10, 2015 and adjusted our assets and liabilities back to their historical cost, adjusted for a catchup of depreciation and amortization during the liquidation period.

Results of Operations

Due to the change in our fiscal year end, approved by our Board of Directors on November 12, 2015, the comparable period presented only covers the ten-month period from March 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, which is a shorter period than the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and thus is not directly comparable.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to the Ten-Month Period from March 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015

Total rental revenues and tenant reimbursement revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 were approximately $1.9 million. Total revenues for the ten-month period ended December 31, 2015 were approximately $841,000. These amounts represent rental revenues and tenant expense reimbursements from our West Palm Beach, Florida and Paramus, New Jersey properties. The relative increase was mainly due to the increased occupancy at the West Palm Beach property since June 2016.

Property operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were approximately $624,000. Property operating expenses for the ten-month period ended December 31, 2015 were approximately $576,000. These amounts consisted of costs incurred for maintenance and repairs, utilities and general operating expenses at our West Palm Beach, Florida property.

Real estate tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $275,000 for the West Palm Beach, Florida property. Real estate tax expense for the ten-month period ended December 31, 2015 was approximately $165,000, primarily for the West Palm Beach, Florida property.

General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were approximately $5.9$7.4 million. Of this amount, approximately $2.8 million related to stock-based compensation, $1.6 million related to payroll and payroll related expenses, and $1.5 million related to other corporate costs including board fees, corporate office rent and insurance.insurance and $1.5 million related to legal, accounting and other professional fees. General and administrative expenses for the ten-month period ended December 31, 2015 were approximately $4.3$6.5 million. Of this amount, approximately $1.4 million related to stock-based compensation, $1.5 million related to payroll and payroll related costs, and $1.4 million related to other corporate costs including board fees, corporate office rent and insurance.insurance and $2.2 million related to legal, accounting and other professional fees. The total increase of $1.6$0.9 million in general and administrateadministrative expenses from 2015 mainly related to the vesting of stock-based compensation related to RSU grants from the December 2015 rights offering.

Professional fees

Transaction related costs of $243,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 were approximately $1.5 million. These costs consisted of general corporate legal fees of approximately $473,000, bankruptcy related professional fees of approximately $277,000, accounting, tax, audit and audit related fees of approximately $336,000, intellectual property maintenance, licensing, operating and start-up costs (inclusive of FilenesBasement.com) of approximately $317,000, and other professional fees of approximately $120,000. Professional fees for the ten-month period ended December 31, 2015 were approximately $2.2 million which consisted of general corporate legal fees of approximately $296,000, bankruptcy related professional fees of approximately $449,000, accounting, tax, audit and audit related fees of approximately $511,000, professional fees related to work on our intellectual property of $937,000 and other professional fees of approximately $44,000. The total decrease in professional fees of $714,000 from 2015 mainly related to the one-time startup costs incurred in 2015 related to the launch of our e-commerce marketplace at FilenesBasement.com.

Transaction related costs of $243,000 represent professional fees and other costs incurred in connection with formation activities and underwriting and evaluating potential acquisitions and investments which are required to be expensed in accordance with the accounting for business combinations.

Depreciation and amortization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were approximately $457,000. These costs consisted of depreciation for the West Palm Beach, Florida property of approximately $165,000$205,000 and the amortization of trademarks and lease commissions and tenant improvements of approximately $292,000.$252,000. Depreciation and amortization expenses for the ten-month period ended December 31, 2015 were approximately $309,000. These costs consisted of depreciation for the West Palm Beach, Florida property of $122,000, as well as amortization of trademarks and deferred financing costs of $187,000.

Operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $7.2 million. Operating loss for the ten-month period ended December 31, 2015 was approximately $6.7 million.

NetEquity in net loss in equity of unconsolidated joint venture for the year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $308,000. This amount represents our 50% share in the joint venture of the newly constructed 95-unit multi-family property in Brooklyn, New York purchased on December 5, 2016. Our share of the loss is primarily due to one-time transaction related costs of $198,000 and depreciation and amortization of $110,000.

Interest income, net, for the year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $42,000, which consisted of $2.1 million of gross interest expense offset by $1.9 million of capitalized interest and $223,000 of interest income. Interest expense, net, for the ten-month period ended December 31, 2015 was approximately $246,000 which consisted of $1.5 million of gross interest expense offset by $1.2 million of capitalized interest and $87,000 of interest income.

AmortizationInterest expense-amortization of deferred financingfinance costs for the year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $98,000, which consisted of $443,000 of amortization of costs related to obtaining the loans encumbering 77 Greenwich and West Palm Beach, Florida partially offset by $345,000 of capitalized costs. AmortizationInterest expense-amortization of deferred financingfinance costs for the ten-month period ended December 31, 2015 was approximately $63,000, which consisted of $291,000 of amortization of costs related to obtaining the loan encumbering 77 Greenwich partially offset by $228,000 of capitalized costs.

We recorded an adjustment to our claims liability for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $132,000 which was due mainly to the positive settlement of the former Majority Shareholder liability. We recorded an adjustment to our claims liability for the ten-month period ended December 31, 2015 of $557,000 which was due to the lower settlement of certain claims.

We recorded approximately $26,000 in tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2016. We recorded tax expense for the ten-month period ended December 31, 2015 of approximately $67,000.

Net loss available to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $7.4 million. Net loss available to common stockholders for the ten-month period ended December 31, 2015 was approximately $6.6 million.

Operating Activities for the Period from February 10, 2015 through February 28, 2015

Total revenues for the period were approximately $43,000. This represents rental revenues for the West Palm Beach, Florida and Paramus, New Jersey properties.

Property operating expenses for the period were approximately $14,000 and consists of costs incurred for maintenance and repairs, utilities and general operating costs.

Real estate tax expense for the period was approximately $12,000 and consists of real estate taxes for the West Palm Beach, Florida property.

General and administrative expenses for the period were approximately $181,000 and consist of payroll and payroll related costs and costs to maintain the corporate office. Of this amount approximately $85,000 relates to stock-based compensation.

Professional fees for the period were approximately $121,000. These costs consist of general corporate legal fees of approximately $20,000, bankruptcy related professional fees of approximately $30,000, audit fees of approximately $11,000, professional fees related to work on the intellectual property of $29,000 and other professional fees of approximately $31,000.

Depreciation and amortization expenses for the period were approximately $18,000 and consists of depreciation for the West Palm Beach, Florida property.

Operating loss for the period was approximately $303,000.

Interest expense for the period was approximately $40,000 and mainly consists of interest on the $40.0 million loan payable that has a variable interest rate. Interest of $68,000 was capitalized as part of real estate under development.

Amortization of deferred financing costs for the period was approximately $17,000, which consisted of amortization of costs related to obtaining the loan encumbering 77 Greenwich.

We recorded tax expense of approximately $2,000 during the period.

Net loss available to common stockholders for the period was approximately $362,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We currently expect that our principal sources of funds to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements for working capital and funds for acquisition and development or redevelopment of properties, tenant improvements, leasing costs, and repayments of outstanding indebtedness will include:

Cash flow from operations is primarily dependent upon the occupancy level of our portfolio, the net effective rental rates achieved on our leases, the collectability of rent, operating escalations and recoveries from our tenants and the level of operating and other costs.

On February 22,As of December 31, 2017, we entered into two secured lineshad total cash of credit for an aggregate$24.2 million, of $12.0which approximately $15.3 million with Sterling National Bank as lender. The lines, which are secured by our properties located in Paramus, New Jersey,was cash and Westbury, New York, mature in 12 months. We have an option to extend the maturity date of each line for an additional 12 months, subject to certain conditions. The lines, which bear interest at 100 basis points over prime with a floor of 3.75%, are prepayable at any time without penalty.

On February 14, 2017, we closed on a private placement of common shares in which we raised gross proceeds ofcash equivalents and approximately $26.9 million. We also commenced a rights offering to our existing stockholders for up to 3.7$8.9 million shares of common stock on March 3, 2017.

was restricted cash. As of December 31, 2016, we had total cash of $8.4 million, of which approximately $4.7 million was cash and cash equivalents and approximately $3.7 million was restricted cash. As of December 31, 2015, we had total cash of $41.8 million, of which approximately $38.2 million was cash and cash equivalents and approximately $3.6 million was restricted cash. Restricted cash represents reserves required to be restricted under the 77 Greenwich Loan agreementour loan agreements (see Note 10 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit to our consolidated financial statements), deposit on property acquisitions and the West Palm Beach, Florida tenant related security deposits and loan related reserves.deposits. The decreaseincrease in total cash during the period fromyear ended December 31, 2015, to December 31, 20162017 was primarily the result of the final payment made toPrivate Placement and the former Majority Shareholder,Rights Offering, in which we raised total net proceeds of approximately $40.6 million, as well as the purchasesale of a 50% joint venture interest in a newly constructed 95-unit multi-family property in Brooklyn,our Westbury, New York as well asproperty, which generated approximately $15.2 million in net proceeds. The proceeds generated from these activities were partially offset by payments for operating expenses and pre-development and development activities. As of February 28, 2018, we had total cash of $33.6 million which is comprised of cash and cash equivalents of $25.4 million and restricted cash of $8.2 million.

On December 22, 2017, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours closed on a $189.5 million construction loan facility for 77 Greenwich (the “77 Greenwich Construction Loan”). We will draw down proceeds available to us as costs related to the construction are incurred for 77 Greenwich over the next few years. In connection with the closing of the 77 Greenwich Construction Loan on December 22, 2017, a portion of the proceeds on the closing date was used to pay in full the outstanding balance, including accrued interest, under our loan with Sterling National Bank, in an aggregate amount of $40.1 million. The balance of the 77 Greenwich Construction Loan was $32.3 million at December 31, 2017 and $36.5 million at February 28, 2018. The 77 Greenwich Construction Loan has a four-year term with one extension option for an additional year under certain circumstances. The collateral for the 77 Greenwich Construction Loan is Borrower’s fee interest in 77 Greenwich, which is the subject of a mortgage in favor of Lender. The 77 Greenwich Construction Loan will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (i) 8.25% in excess of LIBOR and (ii) 9.25% (see Note 10 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion). Although there can be no assurances, we currently anticipate that the proceeds available under the 77 Greenwich Construction Loan, together with equity funded by us to date and future contributions by the SCA, will be sufficient to finance the construction and development of 77 Greenwich without us making any further equity contributions.

On February 22, 2017, we entered into two secured lines of credit for an aggregate of $12.0 million, with Sterling National Bank as the lender, which were secured by our properties located in Paramus, New Jersey, and Westbury, New York, respectively, and had an original maturity date of February 22, 2018. On August 4, 2017, we closed on the sale of the Westbury, New York property and the $2.9 million line of credit that was secured by this property, which was undrawn, matured on that date. The $9.1 million line of credit, which is secured by the Paramus, New Jersey property, was increased to $11.0 million in September 2017, and we extended the maturity date to February 22, 2019. The line of credit bears interest, for drawn amounts only, at 100 basis points over Prime, as defined, with a floor of 3.75%, and is pre-payable at any time without penalty. As of December 31, 2017 and March 15, 2018, the $11.0 million line of credit was undrawn.

On May 11, 2016, our subsidiary that owns our West Palm Beach, Florida property, commonly known as The Shoppes at Forest Hill, entered into a loan agreement with Citizens Bank, National Association, as Lender, pursuant to which the Lender agreed to provide a loan in the amount of up to $12.6 million, subject to the terms and conditions as set forth in the loan agreement.agreement (the “WPB Loan”). Our subsidiary borrowed $9.1 million at closing. This loan requires interest-only payments and bears interest at the 30-day LIBOR plus 230 basis points. The effective rate at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was 3.86% and 3.07%., respectively. This loan matures on May 11, 2019, subject to extension until May 11, 2021 under certain circumstances. The balance of the WPB Loan was $9.1 million at both December 31, 2017 and February 28, 2018. The Borrower can prepay the Loan at any time, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty.

On December 8, 2015, we consummated a common stock rights offering and the transactions contemplated by the Investment Agreements, dated as of September 11, 2015, between the Company and each of MFP Partners, L.P. and Third Avenue. The consummation of the rights offering and the transactions contemplated by the Investment Agreements resulted in our issuance of 5,000,000 shares of common stock whereby we received gross proceeds of $30.0 million.

On February 9, 2015, a newly formed special purpose entity and wholly-owned subsidiary of ours (“TPH Borrower”) entered into a loan agreement pursuant to which the lenders agreed to extend credit to TPH Borrower in the amount of $40.0 million (the “77 Greenwich Loan”). The 77 Greenwich Loan can be increased up to $50.0 million subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. The 77 Greenwich Loan bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (i) the rate published from time to time in the Wall Street Journal as the U.S. Prime Rate plus 1.25% (the “Contract Rate”) or (ii) 4.50% and requires interest only payments through maturity. The interest rate on the 77 Greenwich Loan was 4.50% through December 16, 2015, when it was then increased to 4.75% through December 15, 2016 and then increased to 5.00%. The 77 Greenwich Loan was extended to August 8, 2017 after having satisfied certain conditions. We are currently evaluating our options which include, among others, an extension of the existing loan or refinancing as part of a construction loan. The collateral for the 77 Greenwich Loan is our fee interest in 77 Greenwich and the related air rights owned by us with respect to 77 Greenwich. See Note 10 – Loans Payable to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

We had claims liabilities recorded in our consolidated financial statements of approximately $2.5 million and $10.5 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The claims liability included the multi-employer pension plan of approximately $2.5 million and $3.4 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, which is payable in quarterly distributions of $0.2 million until completely paid (see Note 8 - Pension and Profit Sharing Plans to our consolidated financial statements) as well as the obligation to the former Majority Shareholder of approximately $7.1 million at December 31, 2015. On March 8, 2016, a General Unsecured Claim Satisfaction occurred and on March 14, 2016, we made the final payment to the Majority Shareholder in the amount of approximately $6.9 million. Following this General Unsecured Claim Satisfaction and final payment to the former Majority Shareholder as described above “- Claims Payment Process,” we satisfied our payment and reserve obligations under the Plan and we had no liability to the former Majority Shareholder at December 31, 2016 (see Note 13 - Related Party Transactions to our consolidated financial statements).

We believe our existing balances of cash and cash equivalents, together with proceeds raised from equity issuances, debt issuances, dispositions of properties and/or draws on our $11 million line of credit, will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital needs and projected capital and other expenditures associated with our operations over the next 12 months.

At-The-Market Equity Offering Program

In December 2016, we entered into an "at-the-market"“at-the-market” equity offering program (the “ATM Program”), to sell up to an aggregate of $12.0 million of our common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we sold 120,299 shares of our common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of $1.2 million (excluding approximately $218,000 in professional and brokerage fees) at a weighted average price of $9.76 per share. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued 2,492 shares of our common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $23,000 at a weighted average price of $9.32 per share. As of December 31, 2016,2017, $10.8 million of common stock remained available for issuance under the ATM Program. The sale agreement with our broker expired in accordance with its terms on December 31, 2017. We may enter into a similar sale agreement in the future.

Cash Flows

Cash Flows for the year endedYear Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2016

Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to approximately $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease of approximately $10.2 million of net cash used during this period reflects the net loss availablewas due mainly to common stockholders of $7.4a one-time $6.9 million a decrease in the obligationpayment to the former Majority Shareholder of $6.9 million, a decreasemade in pension liabilities of $1.4 million and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1.5 million. This2016, which was partially offset by the impact of non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $2.8 million.

Net cash used in investing activities for year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $26.2 million. The net cash used reflectsgain on the payments for certain property development and redevelopment costs of $11.9 million capitalized as partsale of the real estate under developmentWestbury, New York property of approximately $3.9 million in 2017, as well as our equity investmenta $5.4 million decrease in net loss, a $1.6 million write-off of $14.3demolished asset and the release of $3.2 million inof restricted cash related to the joint venture which acquired The Berkley property in Brooklyn, New York.

Net cash provided by financing activities for year ended December 31, 2016 was approximately $7.6 million. This amount was primarily from the net proceeds of $8.6$40.0 million received from the WPBPrior 77 Greenwich Loan net proceeds of $0.9 million from the at-the-market stock offering, net of professional fees and brokerage fees,payment, partially offset by the repurchase of approximately $2.0$3.1 million of common stock unitsAMT receivable resulting from certain employees in order to pay withholding taxes on those common stock units for those employees.

Cash Flows for the period ended December 31, 2015

Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $7.0 million for the period ended December 31, 2015. The net cash used during this period reflects the net loss available to common stockholders of $6.6 million as well as a decrease in other liabilities, primarily lease settlement liabilities, of $16.2 million and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1.9 million related mainly to payments of other non-lease related claims, as well as a decrease in pension liabilities of $1.2 million. This was partially offset by a reduction of $18.0 million of restricted cash for the use of paying claims, as well as the impact of non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $1.4 million.ACT.

Net cash used in investing activities for the periodyear ended December 31, 20152017 was approximately $6.3 million.$9.7 million as compared to approximately $26.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease of approximately $16.5 million mainly pertained to the net cash used reflectsproceeds from the payments for certain property development and redevelopment costs capitalized as partsale of the real estate under development.Westbury, New York property on August 4, 2017 of approximately $15.2 million partially offset by approximately $4.9 million more in development work being performed this year at our properties compared to the same period last year. There was also a $14.3 million investment in our unconsolidated joint venture in 2016 as compared to an $8.1 million restricted initial cash deposit for our option to purchase a property at 237 11th Street, Brooklyn, New York in 2017.

Net cash provided by financing activities for periodthe year ended December 31, 20152017 was approximately $27.6 million.$25.0 million as compared to approximately $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This amount was primarilyincrease mainly results from theour Private Placement of common stock in February 2017 in which we raised net proceeds of $29.6approximately $26.6 million as well as our Rights Offering in April 2017 in which we raised net proceeds of approximately $13.9 million. Partially offsetting this was the payment in full of the Prior 77 Greenwich Loan in the amount of $40.0 million and the receipt of proceeds of $32.3 million from the Rights Offering, partially offset by the repurchase of approximately $2.0our new 77 Greenwich Construction Loan, excluding $5.3 million of common stock units from certain employees in orderfees related to pay withholding taxes on those common stock units for those employees.this loan.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20162017 (dollars in thousands):

Capital Expenditures

We estimate that for the year ending December 31, 2017,2018, we may incur approximately $9.9 million$350,000 of capital expenditures and development or redevelopment expenditures (including tenant improvements and leasing commissions) on existing properties.properties, other than 77 Greenwich. We anticipate funding these capital expenditures through a combination of operating cash flow, additional property level mortgage financings, construction financing, issuance of equity and cash on hand.hand, additional property level mortgage financings and operating cash flow. We currently anticipate that the proceeds available under the construction loan, together with equity funded by us to date and future contributions by the SCA, will be sufficient to finance the construction and development of 77 Greenwich without us making any further equity contributions. Future property acquisitions may require substantial capital investments for refurbishment and leasing costs.

Inflation

Substantially all of our leases provide for separate real estate tax and operating expense escalations. In addition, many of the leases provide for fixed base rent increases. We believe that inflationary increases will be at least partially offset by the contractual rent increases and expense escalations described above.

Net Operating Losses

We believe that our U.S. Federal NOLs as of the emergence date were approximately $162.8 million and believe our U.S. Federal NOLs at December 31, 20162017 were approximately $230.2$231.0 million. Pursuant to the Act, AMT credit carryforwards will be eligible for a 50% refund through tax years 2018 through 2020. Beginning in tax year 2021, any remaining AMT credit carryforwards would be 100% refundable. As a result of these new regulations, we have released our valuation allowance of $3.1 million formerly reserved against our AMT credit carryforwards. We have recorded a tax benefit and refund receivable of $3.1 million in connection with this valuation allowance release.   Based on management’s assessment, it is more likely than not that the entire deferred tax assets will not be realized by future taxable income or tax planning strategy.strategies. Accordingly a valuation allowance of $95.3$59.5 million was recorded as of December 31, 2016.2017.

We believe that the rights offering and the redemption of the Syms shares owned by the former Majority Shareholder that occurred in connection with our emergence from bankruptcy on September 14, 2012 resulted in us undergoing an “ownership change,” as that term is used in Section 382 of the Code. However, while the analysis is complex and subject to subjective determinations and uncertainties, we believe that we should qualify for treatment under Section 382(l)(5) of the Code. As a result, we currently believe that our NOLs are not subject to an annual limitation under Code Section 382. However, if we were to undergo a subsequent ownership change in the future, our NOLs could be subject to limitation under Code Section 382.

Notwithstanding the above, even if all of our regular U.S. Federal income tax liability for a given year is reduced to zero by virtue of utilizing our NOLs, we may still be subject to the U.S. Federal alternative minimum tax and to state, local or other non-Federal income taxes.

On February 12, 2015, we amended our certificate of incorporation to, among other things, add a new provision to the certificate of incorporation intended to help preserve certain tax benefits primarily associated with our NOLs (the “Protective Amendment”). The Protective Amendment generally prohibits transfers of stock that would result in a person or group of persons becoming a 4.75% stockholder, or that would result in an increase or decrease in stock ownership by a person or group of persons that is an existing 4.75% stockholder.

Change from Liquidation Accounting to Going Concern Accounting

In response to the Chapter 11 filing, we adopted the liquidation basis of accounting effective October 30, 2011. Under the liquidation basis of accounting, assets are stated at their net realizable value, liabilities are stated at their net settlement amount and estimated costs over the period of liquidation are accrued to the extent reasonably determinable. On February 10, 2015, we changed our basis of accounting from the liquidation basis of accounting to the going concern basis of accounting. Accordingly, our accounting basis for real estate and trademark assets were adjusted to their net book values at the date we changed back to the going concern basis of accounting, adjusted for depreciation and amortization calculated from the date we entered liquidation through the date we emerged from liquidation. This change in accounting basis resulted in a decrease in the reporting basis of the respective assets and liabilities.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts in our consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. A summary of our significant accounting policies is presented in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in our consolidated financial statements. Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements included in this report. Certain of the accounting policies used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are particularly important for an understanding of the financial position and results of operations presented in the historical consolidated financial statements included in this report and require the application of significant judgment by management and, as a result, are subject to a degree of uncertainty.

Critical Accounting Policies

As noted above, we resumed reporting on the going concern basis of accounting on February 10, 2015 and adjusted our assets and liabilities back to their historical cost, adjusted for a catchup of depreciation and amortization during the liquidation period.

Accounting Standards Updates

See Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements.

Market risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and other market changes affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business strategies, the primary market risk which we are exposed to is interest rate risk.

Low to moderate levels of inflation during the past several years have favorably impacted our operations by stabilizing operating expenses. At the same time, low inflation has had the indirect effect of reducing our ability to increase tenant rents. However, our tenant leases include expense reimbursements and other provisions to minimize the effect of inflation.

The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or interest rates. Of our long-term debt, which consists of secured financings, the 77 Greenwich Construction Loan bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (i) 8.25% in excess of the rate published from time to time by the Wall Street Journal as the U.S. Prime Rate plus 1.25% orLIBOR and (ii) 4.50%9.25% and the WPB Loan bears interest at the 30-day LIBOR plus 230 basis points. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. From time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps, collars, and treasury lock agreements in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We would not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes. We do not have any foreign operations and thus we are not exposed to foreign currency fluctuations.

As of December 31, 2016,2017, our debt consisted of two variable-rate secured mortgage loans payable, with carrying values of $40.0$32.3 million and $9.1 million, which approximated their fair value at December 31, 2016.2017. Changes in market interest rates on our variable-rate debt impact the fair value of the loans and interest incurred or cash flow. For instance, if interest rates increase 100 basis points and our variable-rate debt balance remains constant, we expect the fair value of our obligation to decrease, the same way the price of a bond declines as interest rates rise. The sensitivity analysis related to our variable–rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their December 31, 20162017 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would result in a decrease in the fair value of our variable-rate debt by $0.5 million.approximately $445,000. A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would result in an increase in the fair value of our variable-rate debt by $0.5 million.approximately $451,000. These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates changes on our borrowing costs, and assuming no other changes in our capital structure.

As of December 31, 2016,2017, the debt on the unconsolidated joint venture, in which we hold a 50% interest, consisted of a variable-rate secured mortgage loan payable, with a carrying value of $42.5 million (see Note 14 – Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture to the consolidated financial statements), which approximated its fair value at December 31, 2016.2017. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates on the loan taken out by the unconsolidated joint venture would result in a decrease in the fair value of the joint ventures’ variable-rate debt by $0.5 million.approximately $480,000. A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would result in an increase in the fair value of the joint ventures’ variable-rate debt by $0.5 million.approximately $485,000. These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates changes on borrowing costs, and assuming no other changes in the capital structure of the joint venture.

As the information presented above includes only those exposures that existed as of December 31, 2016,2017, it does not consider exposures or positions arising after that date. The information represented herein has limited predictive value. Future actual realized gains or losses with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on cumulative exposures, hedging strategies employed and the magnitude of the fluctuations. As the information presented above includes only those exposures that existed as of December 31, 2016,2017, it does not consider exposures or positions arising after that date. The information represented herein has limited predictive value. Future actual realized gains or losses with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on cumulative exposures, hedging strategies employed and the magnitude of the fluctuations.

See Index to Financial Statements and Supplemental Data on page 35.33.

None.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that it will detect or uncover failures within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in our periodic reports.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to give reasonable assurances to the timely collection, evaluation and disclosure of information relating to the Company that would potentially be subject to disclosure under the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of Trinity Place Holdings Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) Rule 13(a)-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162017 as required by Exchange Act Rule 13(a)-15(c). In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth in the framework in Internal Control–Integrated Framework (2013 Framework) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). Based on our evaluation under the COSO criteria, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 20162017 to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

BDO USA, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm that audited our Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2017, which appears below in this Item 9A.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period from September 30, 20162017 to December 31, 20162017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Report of the independent registered public accounting firmIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Shareholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders

Trinity Place Holdings Inc.

New York, New York

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Trinity Place HoldingsHolding Inc.’s (the “Company’s”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control -– Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria)criteria. Trinity Place Holdings Inc.’s

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and the period from March 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, and the related notes and financial statement Schedule III and our report dated March 15, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Trinity Place Holdings Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Trinity Place Holdings Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 and the period from March 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 and the period from February 10, 2015 to February 28, 2015, the consolidated statements of changes in net assets for the period from March 1, 2014 to February 9, 2015 (liquidation basis), the consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2016 and the periods from March 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 and February 10, 2015 to February 28, 2015, the consolidated statements of changes in net assets for the periods from March 1, 2014 to February 10, 2015, and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016 and the period from March 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 and our report dated March 15, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP
New York, New York
March 15, 2017

None.

PART III

We maintain a code of ethics applicable to our Principal Executive Officer and senior financial and professional personnel (including our Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer or controller and persons performing similar functions). Our code of ethics is posted on our website at www.tphs.com under “Financials”. In the event we have any amendments to or waivers from any provision of our code of ethics applicable to our Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, we intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K by posting such information on our website.

The other information required by this Item will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement relating to our 20172018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (the “2017 Proxy Statement”), and is incorporated herein by reference. If such proxy statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2017,2018, the information called for by this Item will be filed as part of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K on or before such date.

The information required by this Item will be set forth in the 20172018 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. If such proxy statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2017,2018, the information called for by this Item will be filed as part of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K on or before such date.

The information required by this Item will be set forth in the 20172018 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. If such proxy statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2017,2018, the information called for by this Item will be filed as part of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K on or before such date.

The information required by this Item will be set forth in the 20172018 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. If such proxy statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2017,2018, the information called for by this Item will be filed as part of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K on or before such date.

The information required by this Item will be set forth in the 20172018 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. If such proxy statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2017,2018, the information called for by this Item will be filed as part of an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K on or before such date.

PART IV

Schedules other than those listed are omitted as they are not applicable or the required information has been included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

* Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.

None.