UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)

 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from __________ to __________

 

001-35360

(Commission file No.)

 

PARETEUM CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

DELAWARE 95-4557538
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)  

 

100 Park1185 Avenue of the Americas, New York, City, NY 1001710036

USA

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

+ 1 (212) 984-1096(646) 975-0400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

Trading
Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.00001 par value per share NYSE MKT LLC
(Title of Class)TEUM (Name of each exchange on which registered)NASDAQ Capital Market

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   Yes  ¨  No  x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.   Yes  ¨  No  x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x¨   No  ¨x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and postedsubmit pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  x   No¨

 No  Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitionthe definitions of “large accelerated filer”,filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filer¨x
Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting companyx
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Emerging growth company ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes  x   No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes. Yes  ¨   Nox

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2016, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter,2018, was approximately $29$139 million based on the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on such date of U.S. $4.44$2.50 per share, as reported by the NYSE MKTAmerican LLC.

 

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: As of March 23, 2017,October 31, 2020, there were 12,766,102138,820,058 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

 

 

 

Explanatory Note

As previously disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Pareteum Corporation (the “Company” or “Pareteum”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on October 21, 2019, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company determined that the Company’s previously issued financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the interim periods contained therein (collectively, the “Non-Reliance Periods”) could no longer be relied upon. As a result, the Company is filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this “Amendment”) to amend and restate the Company’s original Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, which was filed with the SEC on March 18, 2019 (the “Original Form 10-K”). The Board also has determined that the Company’s previously issued unaudited financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2019, and June 30, 2019, can no longer be relied upon.

Restatement Background

The Board’s decision to restate the Company’s financial statements is based on the Company’s conclusion that certain revenues and the corresponding costs recognized during the Non-Reliance Periods should not have been recorded during the period.

This Amendment reflects the correction of the following errors identified subsequent to the filing of the Original Form 10-K (see Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, Note 1-Restatement for the full detail of the impact of the restatement errors on our consolidated financial statements):

A. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company determined that it incorrectly recognized revenue prior to customers obtaining control of certain products or customer acceptance requirement provisions in contracts, due to an ineffective review of information provided by the sales and procurement teams. As a result, customers had not obtained control of the products in accordance with ASC 606-10-25-30. The primary net effect of the corrections of these errors on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss resulted in reductions in total Revenues, Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization) and General and administrative expenses of $11,970,649, $255,364 and $1,001,493, respectively. Additionally, the Company determined that its accounting for activation fees under ASC 606 was incorrect. The Company had recognized the revenue upfront for activation fees versus being deferred and recognized over the life of the customer. The effect of the correction of this error was a reduction in Revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss and a corresponding increase in Net billings in excess of revenue on the Consolidated Balance Sheet of $197,223.

B. The Company determined adjustments were needed to correct the financial statement presentation due to immaterial accounting errors in the Company’s previously reported consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company made the following adjustments:

i.The Company determined that it had incorrectly recognized revenue on certain product sales prior to customers obtaining control of the products in accordance with ASC 606-10-25-30; this was also due to an ineffective review of information provided by the sales and procurement teams. Correction of these immaterial errors resulted in reduction in Accounts receivable of $184,856; and increases to Other comprehensive loss and Accumulated deficit of $8,191 and $176,664, respectively as of January 1, 2018, to adjust for the cumulative impact of the errors as of the beginning of the earliest period presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

ii.Through a review of its accounting for stock-based compensation, the Company identified immaterial errors in its recording of stock-based compensation expense for equity-classified awards granted to employees and non-employees in 2017. The employee awards were granted with vesting provisions ratably over a one- or two-year period and thus, in accordance with ASC 718 Compensation-Stock Compensation, stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period. The Company incorrectly recognized the stock-based compensation expense related to these awards at the time of grant. For awards granted to non-employees, stock-based compensation which subsequently vests through-out the term of the agreement, the amount of stock-based compensation recorded would be up to the vesting date. The Company incorrectly recognized the stock-based compensation expense related to these awards at the time of grant. The net effect of these immaterial errors resulted in reductions to Common stock and Accumulated deficit of $504,305 as of January 1, 2018 to adjust for the cumulative impact of the errors as of the beginning of the earliest period presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.


The Company also determined that at December 31, 2017 it incorrectly recorded equity-classified share-based awards as liability-classified awards and recorded stock-based compensation expense of $256,609 to Accrued expenses and other payables instead of recording to Common Stock in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet and reflecting such amount in the Company’s Consolidated Statements Of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity(Deficit). The effect of this immaterial error was an increase to Common Stock and a decrease to Accrued expenses and other payables as of January 1, 2018.

iii.The Company incorrectly translated its property and equipment balances at December 31, 2017 using an historical rate and not the current exchange rate at the balance sheet reporting date in accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters. Correction of these immaterial errors resulted in an increase in Property and Equipment, net of $1,126,178 with a corresponding decrease to Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of January 1, 2018 to adjust for the cumulative impact of the errors as of the beginning of the earliest period presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. During 2018, the Company continued to use the incorrect historical rate to translate its property and equipment balances and not the current exchange rate at the balance sheet reporting date. The correction of these errors at December 31, 2018 resulted in an increase in Property and Equipment, net at December 31, 2018 of $235,652 and a corresponding increase in Accumulated other comprehensive loss by the same amount.

In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 99, Materiality, and SAB No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, the Company evaluated the materiality of the errors from a qualitative and quantitative perspective and concluded that the effect of the errors were not material to our previously issued consolidated financial statements.

C. The accounting errors in recording stock-based compensation expense for the stock awards granted in 2017 discussed above impacted the Company’s results of operations in the current year. For certain grants of equity-classified awards granted during the year ended December 31, 2018 to employees and non-employees, the Company identified errors in recording stock-based compensation expense for the same reason noted above. The Company also determined that stock-based compensation expense related to the grant of options in 2018 was not being expensed over the appropriate vesting period. The impact of this error was isolated to the second and third quarter of 2018 with an offsetting effect between the two quarters. The aggregate impact of the Company’s error in recording stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 from this matter was a decrease in Loss from operations of $126,634. In addition, the Company identified incorrect accounting for stock-based compensation expense related to cancelled awards. This error resulted in an increase in the Loss from Operations of $327,107. Other immaterial errors in recording stock-based compensation expense was also identified by the Company.

D. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company determined that it incorrectly accounted for extinguishments of accounts payables for which the Company issued shares to settle the outstanding balances of accounts payable. In accordance with ASC 470-50-40-2, the difference between the reacquisition price of the debt and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt is recognized as a loss or gain in the period of extinguishment. The reacquisition price includes the fair value of any assets transferred or equity securities issued. The effect of these errors on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt, recorded in General and administrative expense, of $143,526 and a corresponding increase in Common stock on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

E. In addition to the matters described above in A, B, C and D, the Company also corrected for immaterial misstatements, including misstatements in certain footnotes, identified during an account review and analysis exercise.

F. The Company identified that it had misstatements in its application of purchase accounting for its acquisition of Artilium plc in October 2018. In accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, for a business combination achieved in stages the acquirer must measure its previously held equity interests in the acquiree at its acquisition-date fair value and recognize the resulting gain or loss, if any, in earnings. The fair value of previously held equity interest in the acquiree is included in the calculation of goodwill. The Company did not appropriately remeasure its previously held equity interest in Artilium at its acquisition-date fair value and record its resulting gain. The correction of this error on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss resulted in a gain on equity investment of $6,370,787 and a corresponding increase in Goodwill on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company also erroneously wrote off its equity investment in Artilium of $3,230,208 by reducing Common stock versus applying it to the calculation of goodwill. In addition, the Company identified errors in its preparation of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows to account for the net of effect of the acquisition and adjusted the impact on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed to appropriately account for cash flows for post-acquisition activity.


Internal Control and Disclosure Controls Considerations

In connection with this restatement, our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer determined that there were deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that constituted material weaknesses at December 31, 2018. Accordingly, our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer have concluded that disclosure controls and procedures (which the Company believes to be an integral part of its internal controls) were not effective at December 31, 2018 and management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective at December 31, 2018.

Items Amended In This Amendment

For the convenience of the reader, this Annual Report Form 10-K/A sets forth the Original Form 10-K, in its entirety, as amended to reflect the restatement. No attempt has been made in this Form 10-K/A to update other disclosures presented in the Original Form 10-K, except as required to reflect the effects of the restatement. The following items have been amended as a result of the restatement:

·Part I - Item 1. Business.

·Part I - Item 1A. Risk Factors.

·Part I – Item 3. Legal Proceedings

·Part I – Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

·Part II - Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

·Part II - Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

·Part II - Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

·Part IV- Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

This Amendment does not reflect adjustments for events occurring after March 18, 2019, the date of the filing of the Original Form 10-K, except to the extent they are otherwise required to be included and discussed herein and did not substantively modify or update the disclosures herein other than as required to reflect the adjustments described above. This Amendment should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC since the date of filing of the Original Form 10-K and all of the Company’s filings after the date hereof.

Item 9A (Controls and Procedures) to this Amendment discloses additional material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls associated with the restatement, as well as management’s restated conclusion that the Company’s internal controls over management reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2018. As disclosed therein, management is currently developing and implementing the changes needed in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting to remediate these material weaknesses.

The Company is also filing a Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm as Exhibit 23.1 and currently dated certifications from our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2 to this Amendment.


Pareteum Corporation

 

Form 10-K10-K/A

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Note on Forward-Looking Statements

 

PART I 8
   
Item 1.Description of Business.Business (restated).58
Item 1A.Risk Factors.Factors (restated).1113
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.2024
Item 2.Description of Property.Properties.2024
Item 3.Legal Proceedings.Proceedings (restated).2125
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosure.2227
   
PART II 27
   
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, and Related Stockholder Matters.Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (restated).2227
Item 6.Selected Financial Data.2329
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.Operations (restated).2329
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.3446
Item 8.Financial Statements.Statements and Supplementary Data (restated).3547
Item 9.Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.75110
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.Procedures (restated).75110
Item 9B.Other Information.76115
   
PART III 115
   
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.77115
Item 11.Executive Compensation.82120
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.92126
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.93126
Item 14.Principal AccountantAccounting Fees and Services.94127
   
PART IV 128
   
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.Schedules (restated).95128

 

2


FORWARD LOOKINGCAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Report, including the documents incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (this “Annual Report”), includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  With the exception of historical matters, the matters discussed in this Annual Report are forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events.   Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed herein, or implied by, these forward-looking statements.   Forward-looking statements are generally identified by words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would” and other similar expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. The statements that contain these or similar words should be read carefully because these statements discuss our future expectations, contain projections of our future results of operations or of our financial position, or state other “forward-looking” information. Pareteum Corporation believesHowever, our actual results may differ materially from those contained in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements.  Factors that it is importantcould cause actual results to communicate our future expectations to our stockholders. However, there may be eventsdiffer materially from those in the future that we are not able to accurately predict or control. Forward-lookingforward-looking statements included in this Report or our other filings with the SEC include, but are not necessarily limited to those relating to::

 

 ·risks and uncertainties associated with the integration of the assets and operations we have acquired and may acquire in the future;

 

 ·our possible inability to generate additional funds that will be necessary to expand our operations;
·

the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern expressed in the most recent report on our audited financial statements;

 

 ·our potential lack of revenue growth;

 ·the length of our potential inability to maintain compliance with the listing standards of the NYSE MKT LLC (“the Exchange”)sales cycle;

 

 ·pending  investigations by the SEC and other lawsuits;

·the outbreak and impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) on the global economy and our potential inability to continue as a going concernbusiness;

 

 ·our potential inability to add new products and services that will be necessary to generate increased sales;
·our potential inability to develop and successfully market platforms or services or our inability to obtain adequate funding to implement or develop our business;

 

 ·

our potential lackability to successfully remediate the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting disclosed in this report within the time periods and in the manner currently anticipated;

·the effectiveness of cash flows;our internal control over financial reporting, including the identification of additional control deficiencies;

 

·risks related to restrictions and covenants in our convertible debt facility that may adversely affect our business;
 ·our potential loss of key personnel;

·the availability ofpersonnel and our ability to find qualified personnel;

 

 ·international, national regional and local economic political changes;changes, political risks, and risks related to global tariffs and import/export regulations;
·

fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;

·our potential inability to use and protect our intellectual property;


·risks related to our continued investment in research and development, product defects or software errors, or cybersecurity threats;

 

 ·general economic and market conditions;
   
 ·regulatory risks and the potential consequences of non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations;

·increases in operating expenses associated with the growth of our operations;
·risks related to our capital stock, including the potentially dilutive effect of issuing additional shares and the fact that shares eligible for future sale may adversely affect the market for our common stock;

 

 ·the possibility of telecommunications rate changes and technological changes;
   
 ·disruptions in our networks and infrastructure;

·the potential for increased competition;competition and risks related to competing with major competitors who are larger than we are;
·our positioning in the marketplace as a smaller provider;

·risks resulting from the restatement of our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, the interim periods contained therein and the interim periods ending March 31, 2019 and June 30, 2019; and

 

 ·other unanticipated factors.those risks listed in the sections of this annual report entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this annual report.

 

The foregoing does not represent an exhaustive list of risks. Please see “Risk Factors” for additional risks, which could adversely impact our business and financial performance. Moreover, new risks emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all risks on our business or the extent to which any risk, or combination of risks, may cause actual results to differ from those contained in any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report are based on information available to us on the date of this Annual Report. Except to the extent required by applicable laws or rules, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained throughout this Annual Report.

3

 

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

 

We maintain a corporate website with the address www.pareteum.com. We intend to use our website as a regular means of disclosing material non-public information and for complying with disclosure obligations under Regulation FD promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).SEC. Such disclosures will be included on the website under the heading “News”“News – Press Releases” and “Investors – Press Releases”.News.” Accordingly, investors should monitor such portions of the website, in addition to following the Company’s press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and the webcasts.

We are not incorporating information contained in the website by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K/A.

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including us, at http://www.sec.gov. We make available, free of charge, through theour website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Qreports, proxy and Current Reports on Form 8-K,information statements and other information, and any amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such material with, or furnishing such material to, the SEC.

 

Materials filed with the SEC can be read and copies made at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1 800 SEC 0330 for further information about the Public Reference Room. The SEC also maintains a website, www.sec.gov containing the reports, proxy and other information filed with the SEC.

4

PART I

 

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, references to “Pareteum,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Pareteum Corporation, a Delaware corporation.

Item 1. Business (Restated)

 

Corporate Overview

 

a.Pareteum Vision

Pareteum Corporation (OTC: TEUM) is a rapidly growing cloud software communications platform company with a mission - to Connect Every Person and Every(Thing) ™.

 

Millions of people and devices are connected around the world using Pareteum’s global cloud software communications platform, enhancing their mobile experience. Pareteum’s goal is to unleash the power of applications and mobile services, which we believe will bring secure, ubiquitous, scalable, and seamlessly available voice, video, SMS/text messaging, and data services to our customers, making worldwide communications services easily and economically accessible to everyone. By harnessing the value of our cloud communications platform, Pareteum serves enterprises, communications service providers, early-stage innovators, developers, Internet-of-Things (“IoT”), and telecommunications infrastructure providers.

With estimates of up to 30 billion devices to be managed and connected according to a market research firm that specializes in global connectivity and emerging technology, the total available market is vast. Service providers, brand marketing companies, enterprise and IoT providers use Pareteum’s cloud communication services and turnkey solutions featuring relevant content, applications, and connectivity worldwide. Pareteum integrates a variety of disparate communications methods and services and offers them to customers and application developers, allowing communications to become a value-added service. We believe thatevery person, this is a major strategic goal for many industries, from legacy telecommunications providers to the disruptive technology and every thing, should be connected,data enterprises of today and will be connected if our customers and users wish to be connected.the future.

 

The way we connect every person,vast majority of our platform is comprised of our self-developed software and every thing, is by beingthe companyintellectual property, which can connect to all networks in the Cloud, on all layers of the software development stack (OSI 7-layer model).

We achieve this by delivering ourMobility, Messaging and Security Cloud Service Platformswhich enable:

Mobile Carriers, MNOs & MVNOs (mobile (virtual) network operators) to enter the Cloud-computing era, with a pay-as-you-grow business; to connect more people, in more creative and value-driven ways.

Enterprises can connect their customers, their employees, their assets and derive more value from them.

IoT (Internet of Things) Devices can connect to each other, and give control, with informational value, to their owners.

b.Pareteum Solution

Pareteum has developed aCommunications Cloud Services Platform, providing (i) Mobility, (ii) Messaging and (iii) Security services and applications, with a Single-Sign-On, API and software development suite:

 

Our solution has proven itself globally against much larger competitors and is installed in multiple companies in diverse countries around the world ranging from small service providers to one of the world’s largest telecoms companies, Vodafone, based in Europe. We had more than 1,100,000 active subscribers on our platforms as of December 31, 2016.

The market andprovides our customers tellwith flexibility in how they use our products and allows us that they need to find ways to reduce cost, they want to find ways to increase their revenues, and they want to scale and grow their business, and all consider Cloud capabilities as a vital means to achieve these goals. As we’ve listened to our customers and understood the business goals that they have, we believe Pareteum is well placed to help them achieve these goals, drive value for customers, and ultimately value for our own business.

be market driven going forward.  We have designed a solution that solves these problems. Each of thesethree platforms - mobility, messagingapproximately 73 patents granted in relation to techniques and security - can be marketedprocesses which support our cloud software and deployed independently, or they can be delivered as a single,communications platform solutions.  Our platform services partners (technologies integrated Cloud Service Platform, as illustrated in the figure above.

5

The Pareteum platform hosts integrated IT/Back Officeinto our cloud) include: Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, AT&T, Amazon Web Services, Sonus, Veniam, Oracle, Microsoft, NetNumber, Affirmed Networks and Core Network functionality for mobile network operators, and for enterprises implement and leverage mobile communications solutions on a fully outsourced SaaS (Software as a Service) , PaaS (Platform as a Service) and/or IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service) basis: made available either as an on-premise solution or as a fully hosted service in the Cloud depending on the needs of our customers. Pareteum also delivers an Operational Support System (“OSS”) for channel partners, with Application Program Interfaces (“APIs”) for integration with third party systems, workflows for complex application orchestration, customer support with branded portals and plug-ins for a multitude of other applications. These features facilitate and improve the ability of our channel partners to provide support and to drive sales.

Our integrated (or modular) Cloud Platform solution includes, more specifically, functionality such as service design and control, Intelligent Networking, subscriber provisioning, messaging, switching, real-time dynamic rating and pre- or post-paid charging and billing, call center and customer care support, reporting, self-care web portal environments, change management in active systems, SIM Management, (Data) Session Control Management, Voucher Management, Mobile Marketing systems, (Mobile) Payment Systems, Real Time Credit Checking Systems, Interactive Voice Response Systems, Voicemail Systems, Trouble Ticketing Systems, Device Management Systems, Mass Customer Migrations, life cycle management, database hardware and software, large scale real-time processing, and integrating, provisioning, all the while managing and maintaining specific core network components.

c.2016 Restructure

We made significant changes to the business in 2016 during a 3-phase restructuring, which saw headcount reduced from 253 at the end of 2015, to 62 at the start of 2017. In addition, end-2015/early-2016 saw significant changes to the Company’s management. In terms of product development, the Company also evolved its managed-servicesworld-class technology offering, into a complementary scalable, rapidly deployable, Communications Cloud Services Platform.providers.

d.Market Opportunity

Pareteum’s target communications markets consist of:

Retail mobile network operators (MNOs), or carriers, who own their own networks (such as existing customers Vodafone and ZAIN etc.).

Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs) who are marketing companies that own subscribers but don’t own their own networks.

Enterprises who are increasingly large businesses of any kind that understand that they can derive value and achieve success by taking control of and harnessing communications (in the broadest sense) whether for employee or customer management, inventory management or other value-added services.

Over the Top application providers (OTT) such as Skype, WhatsApp, etc., who ride over the networks of the retail mobile carriers.

Internet of Things (IoT) markets, made up of wireless devices communicating wherever they are in the world.

 

Pareteum is a providermission-focused company that seeks to empower “Every Person and Every(Thing)” to be globally connected, hence our slogan – ANY DEVICE, ANY NETWORK, ANYWHERE™. The Pareteum cloud communications platform targets large and growing sectors from IoT, Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNO), Smart Cities, and Application developer markets - each in need of mobile networking softwareplatforms, management and connectivity. These sectors need Communications-Platform-as-a-Service (CPaaS), which Pareteum delivers.

Coronavirus Pandemic

In March 2020, the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) began spreading across the globe and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization; the President of the United States declared this a national emergency. The economic effects of the pandemic and resulting social changes are not predictable.  There are a number of uncertainties arising from COVID-19 that could impact our operating results: the effectiveness of COVID-19 mitigation measures, the duration of the pandemic, and the effect on global economic conditions. Likewise, business operational changes, work from home, school from home and shop from home all impact consumer confidence and the availability of supply chain to support these activities. We expect operating and financial results to continue to be adversely impacted by COVID-19 for the duration of the pandemic.

We see an increase in usage consumption, particularly for messaging and consumer mobile services. However, our products and services for customers in the travel and hospitality industries remain negatively impacted. We expect volatility in customer demand and consumption habits as the pandemic continues, and we may experience constrained supply or curtailed customer demand that could adversely impact our operations. Specifically, we see slowed sales cycles, including customers and prospective customers delaying contract signatures or renewals. Customers in the pipeline are uncertain and may minimize commitments related to all of these markets. Pareteum’s Managed Service Platform (MSP) provides a platform for SIM connectivity, Voice, SMS Messagingthe products and Roaming solutionsservices that MNOs and other large service providers can offer their MVNOs. The Global Cloud Mobility Platform (GCMP) provides a complete turnkey (outsourced) solution for similar services to a wide array of service providers, enterprises and marketing channels. Lastly, Pareteum has recently introduced its Exchange Platform and Service Bureau, which can be offered to thousands of smaller service providers, application developers and Internet of Things solutions integrators.we offer.

 


Innovative Use Cases

Many sectors, from traditional network operators to disruptive technology and data-driven companies, have found many innovative use cases for our platforms. Beyond simply enabling communications between people and devices, the platforms of Pareteum are designed to enable any of the following, among others:

 6ØSmart homes, including smart appliances, smart energy meters, wearables etc.

The MVNO market has grown in excess of 20% annually and with demand from application and IoT developers is expected to continue to grow 20% for the foreseeable future. The MVNO market is estimated to be worth $89.25 billion by 2022, according to new research published byGlobal Market Insights, Inc.

HP Enterprise estimates that by 2020, some 30 billion IoT devices will be connected. This provides a substantial opportunity for businesses that are able to address customer issues in this space. Just how integral the IoT will be is further reinforced byGartner, who estimate that “By 2020 more than half of major new business processes and systems will incorporate some element of the Internet of Things”.

According to theGSMA, data growth is driving revenues as operations and investments rise from $1.14 trillion in 2014 to $1.4 trillion by 2020. This reflects the rapid scaling of the communication service provider industry with a total of 3.6 billion unique mobile subscribers at the end of 2014, with an additional one billion subscribers predicted by 2020. Fueled by the growing range of new services and applications, data traffic is expected to see an almost ten-fold increase by 2019. The figure below illustrates the three (3) combined addressable markets for the company:

 

Market share: The current MVNO market exceeds $40 billion. We estimate the MVNE market currently is 10% or $4 billion. At $12 million annualized revenue, Pareteum’s market share is less than 1%. We believe our directly addressable market in the next 3 years exceeds $300 million as illustrated in the figure below:

 

Speed and nature of technological change: Cloud technologies and feature functionality demanded by MNOs, MVNOs, enterprises and developers are continuously changing. Importantly, Pareteum offers MNOs the ability to meet the changing market needs more rapidly than in-house solutions which are typically tied to vertical vendor solutions.

Timing of new products, product enhancements: Pareteum’s contract with Vodafone is one of constant feature development and upgrades. The company rolled out its Exchange Platform & Service Bureau model in mere months. Future product enhancements in 2017 include:

 7ØConnected cars
 ØSmart cities

ØEcommerce engineSmart logistics and supply chains

ØWebRTC client and API

Session Border Controller

M2M IoT solutions

Mobile Payments

e.Existing Customers & PartnersSmart healthcare applications

 

Pareteum has two major mobile network/carrier customers, Vodafone and ZAIN, which together generate in excess of 88% of revenues. In addition our Platforms host mobile communication brands Lebara, SpeakUp and Lowi.es among others.

Pareteum also understandsto the importance of partnerships, and we are proud to have strong relationships with Cisco, Oracle, KPN, T-Mobile, Plusserver, Affirmed Networks, Itconic, HP Enterprises, Sonus among others.

f.Sales

Sales have historically been a highly technical function, but we are changing this. In the past there has been one dedicated sales person assigned to Zain and two technical bid managers focused on Vodafone. Under new strategic sales leadership, Pareteum is deploying a sophisticated sales, marketing and account management force around the world.

For sales and marketing purposes, four core territories have been established:

North America

EMEA

LATAM and Caribbean

APAC

Our current Global Sales Engineering resource will grow to manage individual Sales Engineers in each region. One Connectivity Specialist will focus on the supply chain requirements, procurement of network for the Exchange Platform & Service Bureau as well as negotiate better rates and reduce operational expense and technology cost. Prospective positions and some hires have been identified or engaged already to cover the above territories, which will focus on direct sales and channel sales and will build teams below them.

With the recent addition of a new sales staff and a modern marketing approach and through the use of salesforce.com and various industry resources, conferences, webinars and trade shows Pareteum has begun to touch significantly more qualified opportunities than before.

Sales Cycles:There are three (3) types of sales. The Managed Service Platform (MSP) offering is a software and solution sale and typically has a 6-month sales cycle. The Global Cloud Mobility Platform (GCMP) solution is closer to a 3-month sales cycle. Our Exchange Platform & Service Bureau (EPSB) model, where we are bringing carrier service providers together with our software or other partners, will have varying degrees between the first two scenarios but could also be less than one month.

g.Growth Strategy: 2017 and beyond

Pareteum intends to grow through the continued recruitment of key sales executives and their deployment to major territories including North America, Latin America, Europe, Middle East & Africa as well as the Asia-Pacific region.

There will be additional business rationalization such as additional closure of redundant foreign subsidiaries, and further consolidation of corporate and finance HQ roles into the USA. Pareteum will also be expanding its product set and broadening the types of customers served in 2017.

8

The first aspect of growth is to leverage its current customer relationships into new geographic markets and market segments. Pareteum also expects to respond to a number large-scale Managed Service Platform (MVNE) RFPs in 2017. The second aspect of growth is to expand the Global Mobility Cloud to enable any type of service provider and large enterprises to mobilize their customer or employee base. This market will require greater integration with traditional wireline and communication services.

The third area of growth is the expansion of the exchange platform and service bureau enabling a wide array of specialized and Internet of Things connectivity solutions across wired and wireless applications and services. This plug and play model will also require acquisition of assets and expertise as well as partnership agreements already in place or currently being negotiated.

h.Competition

Pareteum is positionedforegoing, as a cloud-based platform provider, delivering scalable, on-demand, SaaSresult of certain acquisitions completed in October 2018 and PaaS services, as well as managed services, integration, and cloud communications infrastructure.

Pareteum has three (3) distinct types of competitors, including (i) large network infrastructure vendors, (ii) software solution providers and integrators and (iii) small managed service SaaS/PaaS providers.

Competition in our multiple markets is based on price, breadth of offering and demonstrated performance. Both the recent restructuring and resilience of operations for Vodafone in the face of that restructuring position the company well on all fronts. Effective direct sales and channel relationships are also extremely important, and these are being significantly strengthened as major priorities in the Company’s growth plans.

We may need to accelerate the roll-out of our solutions to meet market demand. Telecommunications platforms and services will become more commoditized over the next five to ten years.

The more we can offer a comprehensive one stop shop solution for providing cloud-based communications, the more sustainable our advantages will be against multiple-point solutions and the additional integration and operational complexities they represent. As depth and breadth of solutions are important in addressing the one-stop-shop needs of our customers, a whole range of services should be kept under one roof. Pareteum may need to further invest in such services in the future, either with additional in-house development or through mergers and/or acquisitions.

9

i.Employees

As of December 31, 2016, we employed 62 full time equivalent employees.

Each of our employees and independent contractors is bound by confidentiality and non-competition obligations. Our Spanish employees are represented by a work council and subject to a certain type of collective bargaining agreement. We have not experienced any unilateral work stoppages and consider our relations with our current employees to be good.

Having completed a major restructure in 2016, which saw headcount reduced from 253 on December 31, 2015, to 62 on December 31, 2016, which process included voluntary and involuntary lay-offs, including the complete cessation of operations in Indonesia and China,February 2019, the Company may face further labor-law claims or similar severance or restructuring costs.

j.Intellectual Property

Ourhas acquired certain intellectual property (“portfolios, which it now manages through various wholly-owned direct and indirect subsidiaries (the “Acquired IP Rights”) is protected by a combination of. The Company utilizes patent, copyright, trademark copyright and trade secret laws in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere to protect the Acquired IP Rights.

Business Model

At Pareteum, our mission is to “Empower CSP’s, Enterprises and Developers to simply create and control their own (wireless) communications products and experience through our powerful combination of software, services and global connectivity.” We believe that open software and interfaces for communications services will create more innovation, economic freedom, and opportunity equality worldwide, just like the internet did for information. Our value proposition intersects with numerous applications and industries. It is our strong belief that no other jurisdictions.company in the CPaaS market offers similarly broad value in such a comprehensive way.

However, an easily accessible open mobility system for the world is challenging to scale because it requires a “network effect”. The network effect is the principle that a service yields increased value as it grows. The essence of this point is that our business and our services will grow in value as we grow and scale. We aim to achieve that growth by providing the marketplace exchange on which these communications and transactions take place, and in doing so we attract new users and more customers.

To achieve our desired growth, we are using our managed services solutions as a launching pad from which to grow our Pareteum Experience Cloud Platform by offering Mobility, Engagement, Intelligence and Control products and services to our existing and prospective customers. This process is already well underway, including with our anchor customer Vodafone.

Go-to-Market and Growth Strategy

Pareteum is in growth mode, which we expect to achieve through a combination of organic growth as well as targeted mergers and acquisitions, such as the 2018 acquisition of Artilium.

Pareteum seeks to continue winning new long-term contractual business. We expect this pace to increase throughout 2020 and beyond. Our focus is on selling and implementing new communications services and IoT opportunities as fast as reasonably possible, as the world of connected devices and people continues to rise on a daily basis.

Our go-to-market strategy uses a four-phase approach:

Phase 1:We continue to attract new subscribers across all verticals to all our platforms through direct sales, existing channel partnerships and new initiatives such as referral programs.

Phase 2:We will continue to on-board new communication services providers, multiplying our own growth, largely through business development and direct sales in each of our six defined sales regions (North America, Latin America, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pac).

Phase 3:We will drive adoption through a twin approach. First, we will be on-boarding more “things” (whether SIM cards, handsets, devices, vehicles etc.) to our Pareteum Experience Cloud Platform, as our initial user base. Second, we will be drawing in new and existing customers and end-users to add and consume more services into our existing Pareteum Experience Cloud Platform. These will be people with the greatest pain point, who are underserved by the current mobility networks and applications out in the market (including in developing markets).


Phase 4:At this stage, our strategic Pareteum Experience Cloud Platform customers will have their own go-to-market strategy, creating shared value, ranging from traditional consumer strategies to sophisticated B2B and B2B2C strategies, driving and expanding our ecosystem to new heights.

The phases described above are already being implemented, in parallel as far as possible, for the fastest, most sustainable growth and this highlights our strategy for accelerating the world’s shift to an open mobility and application network. When we’re successful, we believe it might accelerate the pace of innovation in the world, create more economic freedom, and provide better mobility services to billions of underserved people.

 

We have two patents, granted also follow an organic growth plan focused on three core areas:

Exploring cross and up-sale opportunities among Pareteum’s recent customer acquisitions – focused on offering new products and services that complement or supplements their existing or future needs so to accelerate their strategy;

Platform evolution – enhance and expand existing products and services; and

Geographic expansion—in 2016 (in the UKthis area, focusing on entering new markets such as South East Asia and Hong Kong), for an important function of our mobile platform, concerning the migration of subscriber populations from one network operator to another, without requiring a physical SIM card swap. As more and more network operators converge and merge, and as other enterprises start to use and deploy communications services, this technical invention is likely to offer an important commercial advantage and provide a competitive differentiation.Latin America.

Employees

 

The majorityAs of December 31, 2018, the Company had 140 full and part-time employees worldwide. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had 218 full and part-time employees worldwide.

Research & Development

Pareteum’s research and development function attempts to ensure that its communications platforms grow in line with customer needs and technological advancement, and remain resilient, reliable and secure. We have announced innovation in e-commerce, machine learning and predictive analytics, all supported by our IP subsists ingrowing Pareteum application exchange and development community. Enabling our proprietary software,CPaaS with identity management, transaction settlements and Pareteum ispayment solutions greatly expands the copyright holder of almost all key components inopportunity for our software solutions. One exception to this, iscustomers and revenue streams for the ValidSoft technology suite. However, following our divestment ofCompany. Product development expenses for the ValidSoft business on September 30, 2016, we retained a worldwide royalty-free perpetual license to use, sellyear ended December 31, 2018 and integrate ValidSoft’s security2017 were $3,082,956 and voice biometrics platforms with our own communications platform.$1,479,587, respectively.

Intellectual Property

 

Pareteum also ownsrelies on a numbercombination of trademarkspatents, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws in the United States, Europe and elsewhere. The Company protects its brand and reputation through the exploitation of a number of registered and unregistered trademarks and service marks. Pareteum has two granted patents for inventions embedded in its communications platforms, and with the addition of Artilium and iPass has a patent portfolio of some 73 granted patents. The current patent portfolio includes, but is not limited to, a set of developments embracing areas such as advanced network characterization and migration, automated configuration for network appliances, method and system for changing security information in a computer network, method and system for verifying and updating the configuration of an access device during authentication, service quality monitoring process, system and method for enabling wireless social networking and systems and methods for network curation, all expiring throughout 2034, and subject to renewals.

 

Although we take reasonable measuresPareteum further protects its intellectual property rights by requiring all its employees and independent contractors involved in the development of intellectual property to safeguardassign those rights to the Company, to the greatest extent permitted by applicable law.

Sales & Marketing

Pareteum’s sales and marketing teams work together to identify and establish relationships with prospective customers, acquire new ones and expand relationships with existing customers by encouraging their consumption of additional services and products existing in our IP,Pareteum Experience Cloud Platform. Our marketing team generates leads through appropriate licensesour website, online marketing campaigns, webinars, white papers, public relations and other contractual protections, unauthorized partiesoutbound lead development efforts.

We engage with prospective and existing customers through an enterprise sales approach. Our sales executives directly engage C-Level executives and other senior business, product and technical decision makers responsible for the end user experience and financial results at their companies. Our sales executives work to educate these decision makers and their teams about the benefits of using Pareteum Experience Cloud Platform to launch and scale robust communications experiences.


Customers

Our customers are tier 1 communications service providers that provide telecommunications services to end users, Fortune 1,000 companies, mobile virtual network enablers of all sizes, software developers, banks, financial and online payment services companies, global consulting companies, mobile marketing platforms, telecommunications applications, and many others.

A customer advocate is assigned to each new contract, and a multi-step process of handoff from sales to service is handled by this distinct team which is made up of experienced staff around the globe and supported by back office professionals throughout the United States, United Kingdom, Europe, Middle East, Africa and Latin America.

Pareteum provides multiple levels of customer support, including 24x7 support, to ensure service levels and network reliability to meet the expectations and requirements of Pareteum’s customers. Customers which use the Pareteum Experience Cloud Platform value the network reliability and availability, and responsive customer support, competitive pricing, and collaborative approach.

The Company has a significant customer and the loss of this customer could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial conditions. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, this significant customer accounted for approximately 20% and 64% of our revenues.

Competition

We compete with telecommunications solution providers, cloud software and service providers, communications’ platforms, and the in-house IT and network departments of communications companies as well as firms that provide IT services (including consulting, systems integration and managed services), software vendors that sell products for particular aspects of a total information system, software vendors that specialize in systems for particular communications services (such as Internet, land-line and mobile services, cable, satellite and service bureaus) and companies that offer software systems in combination with the sale of network equipment.

We believe that our ability to compete depends on several factors, including:

·the development of software products by others that are competitive with our products and services;

·the price at which others offer competitive software and services;

·the ability to make use of the networks of mobile network operators;

·the technological changes of telecommunication operators affecting our ability to run services over their networks;

·the ability of competitors to deliver projects at a level of quality that rivals our own;

·the responsiveness of our competitors to customer needs; and

·the ability of our competitors to hire, retain and motivate key personnel.

A number of our competitors have long operating histories, large customer bases, substantial financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources, and strong name recognition. Current and potential competitors have established, and may attemptestablish in the future, cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties.

The CPaaS market is moving quickly. The Company believes that the key competitive differentiators for Pareteum in the near-term will be:

§Scale and international reach of connectivity

§Comprehensiveness of platform offerings

§Ease of deployment and implementation

§Scalability and reliability of service

Pareteum considers itself well placed to misappropriatebe judged on those criteria. The Company is confident that its network of global and international connectivity partners will enable it to access markets that currently are under-served and compete equally with larger competitors in mature markets. In addition, Pareteum is confident that few other players have the breadth of value-added services to complement the core connectivity platforms, resulting in competitive positioning for each of the segments where it competes:

§MVNE services for Communication Service Providers (CSP): In a fragmented market without large competitors, Pareteum is well-known in the industry for a wide range of platform functionalities and high flexibility to adapt to customer needs and accommodate complex requirements at a competitive price. As a result, Pareteum is serving leading CSPs in Europe, Asia Pacific, North America, Latin American and Africa, untapping solid growth potential in each of these markets.


§Wi-Fi Connectivity aggregation for Enterprise customers: Pareteum has built an extensive Wi-Fi footprint with exclusive deals, covering more outdoor, hotels, airports, business and leisure areas.  Pareteum offers a unified user experience with seamless access across Wi-Fi hotspots to blue chip customers, with a variety of successful business models.

§SMS A2P for Enterprise customers: Leveraging global connectivity agreements enabling competitive price points and a strong competitive position in Europe, Pareteum offers fully programmable B2C messaging across a wide range of mobile and social channels with simple API integration.

§IoT connectivity platform for IoT solution providers: Leveraging on the above capabilities, Pareteum is in an advantageous position to build a unique proposition for IoT solution providers that would benefit from the large growth potential in IoT. The foundations are in place and Pareteum has already received very positive commercial traction.

Nevertheless, some of our technologycompetitors have greater financial, technical and sales and marketing resources, as well as greater brand and market awareness, and consequently may be able to react more quickly to competitive pressures. As we execute on our growth strategies, and enter new markets, or disrupt markets and replace incumbents, we expect competition to become more intense.

One key tenet in our competitive strategy, however, is to actually lower the competitive barriers to market for new customers to create new mobility and communications applications and businesses. We intend to disrupt existing markets and have the advantage of quick time-to-market for those newly enabled business models and opportunities. These include, for example:

§Uniquely tailored data services such as unlimited social media, messaging apps or streaming music services.

§Global roaming connectivity without local infrastructure: e.g. business executives using a multi-SIM worldwide phone.

§Creation of personal, branded, mobile services.

§One-stop shop for bundles of IoT and machine-to-machine (“M2M”) services: through plug-ins to multiple vertical applications and specialized platforms. One-stop shop for current and next-gen GSM and Wi-Fi connectivity, deployed seamlessly through our CPaaS solutions.

Regulatory

Pareteum is subject to several U.S. federal, state and foreign laws and regulations that involve matters central to our business. These laws and regulations involve privacy, data protection, intellectual property, telecommunications, trade and export sanctions or other subjects. Many of the laws and regulations to which we are subject are still evolving and may be tested or varied in courts and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business or damage our competitive position. Moreover, companies in our communications industries may own significant portfolios of IP rightsbusiness. In addition, the application and could threaten litigation. We are currently subject to, and expect to face in the future, allegations that we have infringed the intellectual property rights of third parties, including our competitors and non-practicing entities. At present, none of these allegations are material.

k.Regulation

We and our customers operate in a heavily regulated industry. As a multinational telecommunications company and provider of services to carriers and operators, we are directly and indirectly subject to varying degrees of regulation in each of the jurisdictions in which we provide our services. Local laws and regulations, and the interpretation of such laws and regulations, differ significantly among the jurisdictions in which we operate. Enforcement and interpretations of these laws and regulations can be unpredictable andoften are often subject to the informal views of government officials. Certain European, foreign, federal, and state regulations and local franchise requirements have been, are currently, and mayuncertain, particularly in the future be, the subject of judicial proceedings, legislative hearingsnew and administrative proposals. Such proceedings may relate to, among other things, the rates we may charge for our local, network access and other services, the mannerrapidly evolving markets in which the Company offerswe operate. Because applicable international laws and bundle our services, the terms and conditions of interconnection, unbundled network elements and resale rates, and could change the manner in which telecommunications companies operate. We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings or the impact they willregulations have on our business, our revenue and our cash flow. Because global regulations changecontinued to develop and evolve at a fast pace,rapidly, it is possible that we, our products or our platform may not be, or may not have been, or may not be, compliant with each such applicable regulationlaw or law at all times.regulation.

 

10

Corporate Information

l.Corporate History

 

Elephant Talk Communications, Inc. (“ETCI”)Pareteum Corporation, a Delaware corporation, was originally formed in 2001 as Elephant Talk Communications Corp. as a result of a merger between Staruni Corporation (USA, 1962) and Elephant Talk Limited (Hong Kong, 1994). In January 2007, through our acquisition of Benoit Telecom (Switzerland), we established a foothold in the European telecommunications market.

In March 2010, ETCI acquired the ValidSoft security and authentication business to complement its mobile telecommunications managed services solutions.

In September 2011, ETCI merged into Elephant Talk Communications Corporation (“ETCC”), a Delaware Corporation (the “Reincorporation”). The Reincorporation was approved by the stockholders at the annual shareholder meeting on September 14, 2011. As a result of the Reincorporation, the Company became a Delaware Corporation. ETCI ceased its corporate existence and ETCC became the surviving Corporation and continued to operate the business of the Company as it existed prior to the Reincorporation.

 

In December 2011, we upgradedthe Company moved its listing from ourthe OTCBB listing to the NYSE MKT LLC (the “Exchange” or “(now known as the NYSE”) American) and ourits stock began trading at that time under the ticker symbol “ETAK”.

In April 2013, the Company acquired most of the contractual assets of Telnicity LLC, a US-based MVNE/MVNO company headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and formed Elephant Talk North America Corporation. The Telnicity acquisition sought to provide the Company with an in-market management team with a view to leveraging existing relationships with certain major U.S. telecommunications companies.

On November 17, 2015, the Company announced the appointment of Robert H. Turner as Executive Chairman.

On September 30, 2016, Pareteum divested of the ValidSoft business, while retaining favorable perpetual, royalty-free, license rights to continue to exploit ValidSoft’s technology.“ETAK.”

 

Following approval at the Company’s 2016 annual shareholderstockholders’ meeting, on November 1, 2016, ETCCthe Company was rebranded and formally renamed to Pareteum Corporation and on November 3, 2016, started tradingthe Company’s ticker symbol on the ExchangeNYSE American was changed to “TEUM.” On October 23, 2018, the Company moved its listing to The Nasdaq Capital Market under its current ticker symbol “TEUM”“TEUM.” On November 10, 2020, Nasdaq notified the Company by letter that the Company’s common stock would be delisted and, accordingly, trading of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq’s Capital Market was suspended effective at the open of business on November 12, 2020 and prices for the Company’s common stock have since been quoted on the OTC Markets Group Inc.’s Pink Open Market.

Pareteum currently has offices in the United States of America, Spain, Bahrain, Indonesia, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands and India and maintains a minor presence in other locations.


Pareteum®, the Pareteum logo, the strapline to “Connect Every Person and Every(Thing)™” and other trademarks or service marks of Pareteum, as well as those trademarks or service marks of the Artilium and iPass group companies, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A are the property of Pareteum Corporation or its subsidiaries. Trade names, trademarks and service marks of other companies appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A are the property of their respective holders.

Acquisitions

Acquisition of Artilium

On October 1, 2018, the Company completed its previously announced acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of Artilium plc, a public limited company registered in England and Wales (“Artilium”) effected by a court-sanctioned scheme of arrangement between Artilium and the Artilium shareholders, whereby each Artilium ordinary shareholder received 0.1016 new shares of the Company’s common stock and 1.9 pence in cash (the “Artilium Acquisition”). In connection with the Artilium Acquisition, the Company issued an aggregate of 37,511,447 shares of the Company’s common stock to Artilium shareholders and cancelled 3,200,332 shares of common stock that were held by Artilium pre-acquisition. Following the Artilium Acquisition, Artilium has operated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and Artilium’s direct subsidiaries operate as indirect subsidiaries of the Company, wholly-owned by Artilium. Artilium is a software development company active in the enterprise communications and core telecommunications markets delivering software solutions which layer over disparate fixed, mobile and IP networks to enable the deployment of converged communications services and applications.

Acquisition of iPass

 

On November 1, 2016,12, 2018, the Company also announcedentered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “iPass Merger Agreement”) by and among the appointmentCompany, iPass Inc. (“iPass”), and TBR, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“TBR”). Pursuant to the iPass Merger Agreement, TBR commenced an exchange offer (the “iPass Offer”) for all of the outstanding shares of iPass’ common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, for 1.17 shares of the Company’s common stock, together with cash in lieu of any fractional shares, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes. The iPass offer and withdrawal rights expired at 5:00 p.m. New York City time on February 12, 2019, and promptly following such time TBR accepted for payment and promptly paid for all validly tendered iPass shares in accordance with the terms of the iPass Offer. In aggregate, the Company issued 9,867,041 shares of common stock to the iPass shareholders in March 2019. Prior to its acquisition by us, iPass was a new Chief Executive Officer, Victor Bozzo, to work alongside Mr. Turner.leading provider of global mobile connectivity, offering simple, secure, always-on Wi-Fi access on any mobile device.

 

Item 1A.  Risk Factors (Restated)

 

An investment in our common stock is subject to risks inherent in our business.  Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information included in this report.  In addition to the risks and uncertainties described below, other risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.  The value or market price of our common stock could decline due to any of these identified or other risks, and you could lose all of your investment.

 

Risks Related to Our Business

The restatement of our previously issued financial statements contained in this Amendment No. 1 to our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2018 on Form 10-K/A and in an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 we intend to subsequently file, may lead to additional risks and uncertainties, including regulatory, stockholder or other actions, loss of investor confidence and negative impacts on our stock price.

On October 21, 2019, our board of directors determined that the Company’s financial statements that were included in its annual report for the year ended December 31, 2018 and quarterly reports for the quarters ended March 31, 2019 and June 30, 2019 (collectively, the “Non-Reliance Periods”) should no longer be relied upon. Similarly, related press releases, earnings releases, and investor communications describing the Company’s financial statements for the Non-Reliance Periods should no longer be relied upon. This Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A contains restated financial statements for the Non-Reliance Periods that occurred in the year ended December 31, 2018, including the interim periods within such year. We arealso intend to file an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 that will contain restated financial statements for the Non-Reliance Periods that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2019.


As a result of this restatement and associated non-reliance on previously issued financial information, we have become subject to a number of additional costs and risks, including unanticipated costs for accounting and legal fees in connection with or related to the restatement and the remediation of our ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. Likewise, the attention of our management team has been diverted by these efforts. In addition, we could also be subject to additional stockholder, governmental, regulatory or other actions or demands in connection with the restatement or other matters. Any such proceedings will, regardless of the outcome, consume a significant restrictive debt covenants, which limitamount of management’s time and attention and may result in additional legal, accounting, insurance and other costs. If we do not prevail in any such proceedings, we could be required to pay damages or settlement costs. In addition, the restatement and related matters could impair our operating flexibility.reputation or could cause our customers, stockholders, or other counterparties to lose confidence in us. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and stock price. In connection with the restatement of our financial statements for the Non-Reliance Periods, our management identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as described in Item 9A, “Control and Procedures” of this report. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies in internal controls over financial reporting that results in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Further, management determined that control deficiencies existed with respect to certain aspects of our historical financial reporting and, accordingly, management has concluded that management’s reports related to the effectiveness of internal and disclosure controls may not have been correct.

Our business may be adversely impacted by risks, or the public perception of the risks, related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

The Amendedoutbreak of COVID-19 has resulted in a widespread health crisis that has adversely affected the economies and Restated Credit Agreement dated December 27, 2016 (further amended March 6, 2017) entered into byfinancial markets of many countries, resulting in a global economic downturn. As a response to the spread of COVID-19 many countries, including the United States, Great Britain and between the Company and Atalaya Administrative LLC, as the administrative agent and collateral agent,other jurisdictions in Europe, South America and the lenders party thereto contains covenantsMiddle East where we have employees, have been taking measures designated to limit the continued spread of COVID-19, including the closure of workplaces, restricting travel, prohibiting assembling, closing international borders and quarantining populated areas. Governments around the world have passed temporary emergency orders requiring all residents to remain in their homes along with limitations on which impose significantbusiness are allowed to remain open and the number of workers allowed at each site. Although many of these orders have been partially lifted in certain jurisdictions, the effects of these indefinite travel restrictions and alternative working arrangements are unknown, may negatively impact the productivity of our employee base, and may have a negative effect on our sales and operations functions, which could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

While the mannerfull impact of the COVID-19 outbreak is unknown at this time, we are closely monitoring the developments and continually assessing the potential impact on our subsidiaries operate, including (but not limited to) restrictionsbusiness. Our business may be adversely affected by the COVID-19 outbreak due to the following risks, any of which may lead to an adverse effect on the ability to:our financial condition and results of operations:

 

·create certain liens;a number of our employees may be infected and/or subject to quarantine periods and may be unable to perform their duties and our offices may be forced to operate with a reduced workforce and/or be forced to close under the temporary emergency regulations. This may lead to ineffective control over our business and a lower work efficiency, productivity and financial performance;
·incur debt and/or guarantees;
·enter into transactions other than on arm’s-length basis;
·pay dividends or make certain distributions or payments;
·engage, in relation to the Company, in any business activity or own assets or incur liabilities not authorized by the agreement;

11

 

·sell certain kindsa reduced workforce, lack of assets;international travel, and few face-to-face meetings with customers and potential customers may adversely affect our operations;

·impair any security interest on the assets serving as collateral for the notes issued under the agreement;we may experience difficulties in collecting amounts due from customers, including major customers, due to a downturn in their financial condition; and

·enter into any saledue to the pandemic, a significant number of our employees have moved to work from their homes and leaseback transactions;
·make certain investments or other typesremotely access our IT networks. Such remote working mode creates the risk of restricted payments;
·substantially changeattacking the natureend-point user stations, connection channels and gateways. These potential breaches of the Company’s or the group’s business;
·designate unrestricted subsidiaries; and
·effect mergers, consolidations or sale of assets.our security measures may harm our business.

 

These covenants could limitHistorically, a significant portion of our sales were conducted in person. Currently, as a result of the work and travel restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, substantially all of our sales and professional services activities are being conducted remotely. As of the date of this Annual Report, we do not yet know the extent of the negative impact on our ability to financeattract, serve or retain customers. Furthermore, as a result of uncertainty due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as general economic uncertainty and associated macroeconomic conditions, existing and potential customers may choose to reduce or delay technology spending in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, or attempt to renegotiate contracts and obtain concessions, which may materially and negatively impact our future operationsoperating results, financial condition and prospects. This could result in reductions in sales of our abilityplatform and services, longer sales cycles, reductions in subscription duration and value, slower adoption of new technologies and increased price competition. Any of these events could harm our business and operating results. In addition, there can be no assurance that cloud-based collaborative work management and productivity spending levels will increase following any recovery.


The number of companies whose employees are working remotely as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting government-ordered shutdowns has caused use of our platform to pursue acquisitionsincrease. If our data centers are unable to keep up with this increased usage, customers may experience delays or interruptions in service, which could result in the loss of customers who use our communications platform because of its reliability and other business activities.performance.

 

TheOur independent auditor’s report contains an explanatory paragraph that expresses substantial and continuing losses, and significant operating expenses incurred in the past few years may cause us to be unable to pursue all of our operational objectives if sufficient financing and/or additional cash from revenues is not realized. This raises doubt as toabout our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

WeBased on our current projection of revenue, expenses, capital expenditures and cash flows, we will not have incurred net losses of $31,444,704sufficient resources to fund our operations and $5,006,235meet the obligations specified in the documents governing our convertible financing for the years ended December 31, 2016next twelve months following the filing of this amended Annual Report. Our software platforms require ongoing funding to continue the current development and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2016,operational plans and 2015, we had an accumulated deficit of $287,080,234 and $255,635,531, respectively.

Although we have previously been able to attract financing as needed, such financing may nota history of net losses. We believe that we will continue to expend substantial resources for the foreseeable future in connection with the continued development of our software platforms. These expenditures will include costs associated with research and development activity, corporate administration, business development, and marketing and selling of our services. In addition, other unanticipated costs may arise. As a result, we believe that additional capital will be required to fund our operations. To access capital to fund operations and or provide growth capital to meet the obligations in the note, we may need to restructure our convertible indebtedness and raise capital in one or more debt and/or equity offerings. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising the necessary capital or that any such offering will be available at all, or if available, on reasonable terms as required. Further, the terms of such financing may be dilutive to existing shareholders or otherwiseus on terms not favorableacceptable to us, or existing shareholders.at all. If we are unable to secureraise additional financing, as circumstances require, or do not succeed in meeting our sales objectives, wecapital that may be requiredneeded on terms acceptable to change orus, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Furthermore, the recent outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted world financial markets, negatively impacted U.S. market conditions and may reduce our operations or ultimately may not be ableopportunities for us to continue our operations. Asseek out additional funding. In particular, a resultdecline in the market price of our historical net lossescommon stock could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and cash flow deficits, and net capital deficiency,price that we deem appropriate. For these conditions raisereasons, the audit report of our independent registered public accountants on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 contains an explanatory paragraph stating that there is substantial doubt as to the Company’sabout our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

The current economic climate, especially in Europe, may have an adverse effect in the markets in which we operate.

 

Much of our customers’ business is consumer driven, and to the extent there is a decline in consumer spending, our customers could experience a reduction in the demand for their services and consequently affect the demand for our services and a decrease in our revenues, net income and an increase in bad debts arising from non-payment of our trade receivables. The potential adverse effects of an economic downturn include:


·reduced demand for services, resulting in increased price competition or deferrals of purchases, with lower revenues not fully compensated through reduced costs;
·risk of financial difficulties or failures among our suppliers;

·increased demand for customer finance, difficulties in collection of accounts receivable and increased risk of counterparty default;

·risk of impairment losses related to our intangible assets as a result of lower forecasted sales of certain products;

·increased difficulties in forecasting sales and financial results as well as increased volatility in our reported results; and

·end user demand could also be adversely affected by reduced consumer spending on technology, changed operator pricing, security breaches and trust issues.

 

Uncertainties and risks associated with international markets could adversely impact our international operations.

 

We have significant international operations in Europe, and to a lesser extent in the US,U.S., Middle East and elsewhere. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the permits and operating licenses required for us to operate, obtain access to local transmission facilities on economically acceptable terms, or market services in international markets. In addition, operating in international markets generally involves additional risks, including unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, taxes, tariffs, customs, duties and other trade barriers, difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations, problems in collecting accounts receivable, political risks, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, restrictions associated with the repatriation of funds, technology export and import restrictions, and seasonal reductions in business activity. Our ability to operate and grow our international operations successfully could be adversely impacted by these risks.

 

12

We operate in a complex regulatory environment, and failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could adversely affect our business.

 

Our operations are subject to a broad range of complex and evolving laws and regulations. Because of our coverage in many countries, we must perform our services in compliance with the legal and regulatory requirements of multiple jurisdictions. Some of these laws and regulations may be difficult to ascertain or interpret and may change from time to time. Violation of such laws and regulations could subject us to fines and penalties, damage our reputation, constitute a breach of our client agreements, impair our ability to obtain and renew required licenses, and decrease our profitability or competitiveness. If any of these effects were to occur, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. Additionally, to serve our international markets, we maintain business entities in various jurisdictions around the world. Accordingly, we must maintain and operate these business entities in compliance with the applicable corporate, tax, employment and other laws of these various jurisdictions, which adds complexity to our operations. Our failure to maintain compliance with such laws and regulations could give rise to liabilities that could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

We may not be able to integrate new technologies and provide new services in a cost-efficient manner.

 

The telecommunications industry is subject to rapid and significant changes in technology, frequent new service introductions and evolving industry standards. We cannot predict the effect of these changes on our competitive position, our profitability or the industry generally.in general. Technological developments may reduce the competitiveness of our networks and our software solutions and require additional capital expenditures or the procurement of additional products that could be expensive and time consuming. In addition, new products and services arising out of technological developments may reduce the attractiveness of our services. If we fail to adapt successfully to technological advances or fail to obtain access to new technologies, we could lose customers and be limited in our ability to attract new customers and/or sell new services to our existing customers. In addition, delivery of new services in a cost-efficient manner depends upon many factors, and we may not generate anticipated revenue from such services.

 

We may not be able to develop and successfully market our mobile telecommunications platform and services as planned.

 

Pareteum operates in an exceptionally competitive environment where there is continuous innovation and new development. We are required to be a top performer in over a dozen highly specialized domains to effectively compete with our competitors. Ongoing investments are required to stay ahead of the competition. The sales process for our platform and the deployment process may be complicated and very slow. We are highly dependent on convincing MNOsmobile network operators (“MNOs”) and MVNOsmobile virtual network operators (“MVNOs”) to believe that outsourcing their requirements to us is the best way to go. We are exposed to business risks associated with turnkey projects and the scalability of our service and support organization. Although our policy is to avoid or minimize risks, it cannot be ruled out that in certain cases events occur that may seriously impact us and our performance.

 

Some of ValidSoft’s security solutions are dependent on mobile operators for network data access. Home-routing is sometimes preventing us from capitalizing on our capability. It tends to be a slow process to enter into definitive contracts with mobile operators. In addition, it is difficult to obtain network data access which is slowing our ability to timely address current market opportunities. The current market perception about safeguarding privacy remains challenging. Both the regulatory regime and consumer awareness of privacy protection are developing very slowly.

Implementation and development of our software platform business depends on our ability to obtain adequate funding.

 

Our software platforms require ongoing funding to continue the current development and operational plans. plans and we have a history of net losses. We believe that we will continue to expend substantial resources for the foreseeable future in connection with the continued development of our software platforms. These expenditures will include costs associated with research and development activity, corporate administration, business development, and marketing and selling of our services. In addition, other unanticipated costs may arise. When our available cash and cash equivalents become insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, or if and when we identify additional opportunities to do so, we will likely seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain additional credit facilities.

Failure to obtain such adequate financing will substantially delay our development, slow down current operations, result in loss of customers and adversely impact our results of operations.  Additionally, the funds we need may not be available when we need them, on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. Furthermore, the recent outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted world financial markets, negatively impacted U.S. market conditions and may reduce opportunities for us to obtain additional funding. In particular, a decline in the market price of our common stock could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate.

13

 

Disruptions in our networks and infrastructure may result in customer dissatisfaction, customer loss or both, which could materially and adversely affect our reputation and business.

 

Our systems are an integral part of our customers’ business operations. It is critical for our customers that our systems provide a continued and uninterrupted performance. Customers may be dissatisfied by any system failure that interrupts our ability to provide services to them. Sustained or repeated system failures would reduce the attractiveness of our services significantly and could result in decreased demand for our services.

 


We face the following risks to our networks, infrastructure and software applications:

 

·our territory can have significant weather events whichcan physically damage access lines;

·power surges and outages, computer viruses or hacking, earthquakes, terrorism attacks, vandalism and software or hardware defects which are beyond our control; and

·unusual spikes in demand or capacity limitations in our or our suppliers’ networks.

 

Disruptions may cause interruptions in service or reduced capacity for customers, either of which could cause us to lose customers and/or incur expenses, and thereby adversely affect our business, revenue and cash flow.

Cybersecurity breaches and other disruptions could adversely affect our business, and could compromise our information and expose us to liability and reputational harm.

The size and complexity of our information systems make such systems potentially vulnerable to service interruptions or to security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees or vendors, or from attacks by malicious third parties. Such attacks are of ever-increasing levels of sophistication and are made by groups and individuals with a wide range of motives and expertise. While we have invested in the protection of data and information technology, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent or quickly identify service interruptions or security breaches. Any such interruption or breach of our systems could adversely affect our business operations and/or result in the loss of critical or sensitive confidential information or intellectual property, and could result in financial, legal, business and reputational harm to us. Similarly, we could be subject to liability or our reputation could be harmed if technologies integrated into our products fail to prevent cyberattacks, or if our customers fail to safeguard the systems with security policies that conform to industry best practices. In addition, any cyberattack or security breach that affects a competitor’s product could lead to the negative perception that our products are similarly vulnerable to attacks or breaches.

In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property and proprietary and/or personally identifiable information of customers, partners, employees, and other third parties. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to our operations. Despite our security measures and precautions, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any hack or breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any unauthorized access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, disrupt our operations, lead to reputational harm or loss of confidence in our products and services, all of which could adversely affect our business.

 

Integration of acquisitions ultimately may not provide the benefits originally anticipated by management and may distract the attention of our personnel from the operation of our business.

 

We strive to broaden our solutions offerings as well as to increase the number of subscribers hosted on our platforms, volume of voice and data that we carry over our existing global network in order to reduce transmission costs and other operating costs as a percentage of net revenue, improve margins, improve service quality and enhance our ability to introduce new products and services. Strategic acquisitions in desired markets play a part of our growth strategy, and we may pursue additional acquisitions in the future to further strengthen our strategic objectives. Acquisitions of businesses and customer lists involve operational risks, including the possibility that an acquisition may not ultimately provide the benefits originally anticipated by management. Moreover, we may not be successful in identifying attractive acquisition candidates, completing and financing additional acquisitions on favorable terms, or integrating the acquired business or assets into our own. There may be difficulty in integrating technologies and solutions, in migrating customer bases and in integrating the service offerings, distribution channels and networks gained through acquisitions with our own. For example, our recent acquisitions have led to the unexpected addition of a significant amount of aged accounts payable to our balance sheet. Successful integration of operations and technologies requires the dedication of management and other personnel, which may distract their attention from the day-to-day business, the development or acquisition of new technologies, and the pursuit of other business acquisition opportunities. Therefore, successful integration may not occur in light of these factors.

 

Our revenue, earnings and profitability are affected by the length of our sales cycle, and a longer sales cycle could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

 

Our business is directly affected by the length of our sales cycle and strategic mobile partnership cycles with MNOs and other large enterprises. Our software platforms, outsourced solutions and value addedvalue-added communication services, are relatively complex and their purchase may involve a significant commitment of mostly human capital, with attendant delays frequently associated with the allocation of substantial human resources and procurement procedures within an organization. The purchase of these types of products typically also requires coordination and agreement across many departments within a potential customer. Delays associated with such timing factors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In periods of economic slowdown in the communications industry, which may recur in the current economic climate, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the government shutdown orders that have been implemented in many jurisdictions around the world in an effort to slow the spread of the pandemic, our typical sales cycle may lengthen, which means that the average time between our initial contact with a prospective customer and the signing of a sales contract increases. The lengthening of our sales and strategic mobile partnership cycle could reduce growth in our revenue in the future.future, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

14

Because most of our business is conducted outside the US,U.S., fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates versus the USU.S. Dollar could adversely affect our (reported) results of operations.

 

Currently most of our net revenue, expenses and capital expenditures are derived and incurred from sales and operations outside the US,U.S., whereas the reporting currency for our consolidated financial statements is the USU.S. Dollar (“USD”). The local currency of each country is the functional currency for each of our respective entities operating in that country, wheremaking the Euro is the predominant currency.currency in which our business is conducted. Considering the fact that most income and expenses are not subject to relevant exchange rate differences, it is only at a reporting level that the translation needs to be made to the reporting unit of USD. In the future, we expect to continue to derive a significant portion of our net revenue and incur a significant portion of our operating costs outside the US,U.S., and changes in exchange rates have had and may continue to have a significant, and potentially distorting effect (either negative or positive) on the reported results of operations, not necessarily being the result of operations in real terms. Our primary risk of loss regarding foreign currency exchange rate risk is caused by fluctuations in the followingUSD/Euro exchange rates: USD/Euro.rates.

 

We historically have not engaged in hedging transactions since we primarily operate in same currency countries, currently being the Euro (“EUR”). However, the operations of affiliates and subsidiaries in non-US countries have been funded with investments and other advances denominated in foreign currencies and more recently in USD. Historically, such investments and advances have been long-term in nature, and we have accounted for any adjustments resulting from currency translation as a charge or credit to accumulateAccumulated other comprehensive loss within the stockholders’ deficitStockholders’ Equity section of our consolidated balance sheets.Consolidated Balance Sheets. Although we have not engaged in hedging so far, we continue to assess on a regular basis the possible need for hedging.

 

We are substantially smaller than our major competitors, whose marketing and pricing decisions, and relative size advantage, could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain customers and are likely to continue to cause significant pricing pressures that could adversely affect our net revenues, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Our services related to cloud-based communications software and information systems, outsourced solutions and value addedvalue-added communication services are subject to competitive pressure, and we expect competition to continue to increase. We compete with telecom solution providers, independent software and service providers and the in-house IT and network departments of communications companies as well as firms that provide IT services (including consulting, systems integration and managed services), software vendors that sell products for particular aspects of a total information system, software vendors that specialize in systems for particular communications services (such as Internet, land-line and mobile services, cable, satellite and service bureaus) and companies that offer software systems in combination with the sale of network equipment. Also, in this more fragmented market, larger players exist with associated advantages described earlier which we need to compete against.

 

We believe that our ability to compete depends on a number ofseveral factors, including:

 

·the development by others of software products that are competitive with our products and services,
services;

·the price at which others offer competitive software and services,services;

·the ability to make use of the networks of mobile network operators,operators;

·the technological changes of telecommunication operators affecting our ability to run services over their networks,networks;

·the ability of competitors to deliver projects at a level of quality that rivals our own,own;

·the responsiveness of our competitors to customer needs,needs; and

·the ability of our competitors to hire, retain and motivate key personnel.

 

A number of our competitors have long operating histories, large customer bases, substantial financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources, and strong name recognition. Current and potential competitors have established, and may establish in the future, cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties. Many of our competitors are also able to offer service at lower prices than we are, forcing us to match their prices in response. This negatively affects our gross margins and financial results of operations. If we fail to effectively compete, we may experience lower revenues and/or net income, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 


Our positioning in the marketplace as a smaller provider places a significant strain on our resources, and if not managed effectively, could result in operational inefficiencies and other difficulties.

 

Our positioning in the marketplace may place a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources, and increase demand on our systems and controls. To manage this position effectively, we must continue to implement and improve our operational and financial systems and controls, invest in development &and engineering, critical systems and network infrastructure to maintain or improve our service quality levels, purchase and utilize other systems and solutions, and train and manage our employee base. As we proceed with our development, operational difficulties could arise from additional demand placed on customer provisioning and support, billing and management information systems, product delivery and fulfillment, sales and marketing and administrative resources.

 

15

For instance, we may encounter delays or cost overruns or suffer other adverse consequences in implementing new systems when required. In addition, our operating and financial control systems and infrastructure could be inadequate to ensure timely and accurate financial reporting.

We need to grow our business and revenue in order to achieve profitability.

We need to expand our network to maintain and grow our business and revenue. If we fail to expand and maintain an effective sales force or successfully develop our relationships with new customers, our business, prospects and brand may be materially and adversely affected. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully grow our client base or expand the number of services provided to them. If we fail to do so, our sales could fail to grow or could decline, and our ability to grow our business could be adversely affected, which could prevent our revenues from covering our fixed costs and deny the Company operating leverage, delaying the date at which we achieve profitability. Accordingly, if we do not grow our revenue and business, we will not achieve profitability in the near term, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and the trading price of our common stock.

 

We could suffer adverse tax and other financial consequences if USU.S. or foreign taxing authorities do not agree with our interpretation of applicable tax laws.

 

Our corporate structure is based, in part, on assumptions about the various tax laws, including withholding tax, and other relevant laws of applicable non-USnon-U.S. jurisdictions. Foreign taxing authorities may not agree with our interpretations or reach different conclusions. Our interpretations are not binding on any taxing authority and, if these foreign jurisdictions were to change or to modify the relevant laws, we could suffer adverse tax and other financial consequences or have the anticipated benefits of our corporate structure materially impaired.

The current restructuring and reorganization could result in significant disruption of our business and our relationships with our employees, suppliers and customers could be adversely affected.

In 2015 and particularly in 2016 we undertook significant restructuring and reorganization activities in order to improve operating efficiencies and reduce operating costs, including changes in our executive team and Board of Directors, or Board. Such activities may require significant efforts, including the integration, consolidation and rationalization of product development, sales and marketing efforts and general and administrative activities. These activities could result in the disruption of our business including relationships with employees, suppliers and customers, all of which could adversely affect our operating results. There can be no assurance that such activities would be successful or reduce operating costs.

We have recently experienced several changes in our management team and will need to re-align the organization and may need to recruit, hire and retain additional executive talent which may cause disruption in our business.

We recently had significant changes in executive leadership. In November 2015, Mr. Steven van der Velden resigned as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In connection with his resignation, Mr. Robert Hal Turner was appointed Executive Chairman, Mr. Gary Brandt was appointed as interim Chief Restructuring Officer and Mr. Armin Hessler as Chief Operating Officer. In January 2016, Mr. Martin Zuurbier resigned as Chief Technology Officer and Co-President Mobile Platform activities. In November 2016, Victor Bozzo was appointed Chief Executive Officer.

In addition to the foregoing management changes, we commenced in the fourth quarter of 2015 a substantial restructuring and rationalization of our operations.

These changes and the short time interval in which they have occurred have been disruptive to our employees and business and may add to the risk of control failures, including a failure in the effective operation of our internal control over financial reporting or our disclosure controls and procedures. Additionally, it may take time to hire new executives and for the new management team to become sufficiently familiar with our business and each other to effectively develop and implement our business strategies. Accordingly, disruption to our organization as a result of executive management transition This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Changes to company strategy, which can often occur with the appointment of new executives, can create uncertainty, may negatively impact our ability to execute quickly and effectively, and may ultimately be unsuccessful. In addition, executive leadership transition periods are often difficult and tension can result from changes in strategy and management style. Management transition inherently causes some loss of institutional knowledge, which can negatively affect strategy and execution. Until we integrate new personnel, and unless they are able to succeed in their positions, we may be unable to successfully manage and grow our business, and our results of operations and cash flows.

Our management has identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, that, if not remediated, or if we identify additional material weaknesses or other adverse findings in the future, may not allow us to be able to report our financial condition could suffer asor results of operations accurately or timely, which may result in a result. In addition, uncertainty regardingloss of investor confidence in our financial reports, significant expenses to remediate any internal control deficiencies, and ultimately have an adverse effect on the timing or effectiveness of our management transition process may also harm our reputation and adversely affect the tradingmarket price of our common stock.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, our management is required to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm is required to attest to, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As disclosed in Part II, Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, of this Annual Report, our management identified material weaknesses in internal controls related to:

(i)entity level controls were not effective due to certain executive management “tone at the top” issues which contributed to an ineffective control environment and to deficiencies aggregating to material weaknesses.

(ii)insufficient experienced resources to complete the documentation of internal control assessment;

(iii)ineffective design, implementation and monitoring of information technology general controls pertaining to the Company’s change management process;

(iv)the accurate and timely recognition of revenue leading to the premature or inaccurate recognition of revenue for certain customer transactions in 2018, impacting Revenues, Cost of Revenues, Operating Income, Net Loss, Accounts Receivable and other Balance Sheet line items;

 


 16(v)accounting for equity and incorrect recognition of stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock awards granted to employees and non-employees over appropriate vesting periods impacting line items on the Statement of Comprehensive Loss and;

(vi)valuation of fixed assets due to using a historical exchange rate for purchases to eliminate exchange rate fluctuations, impacting Property and equipment, net, and Accumulated other comprehensive loss.

(vii)proper purchase accounting treatment for a business combination achieved in stages in the acquisition of Artilium, resulting in adjustments to Goodwill with a corresponding Gain on equity investment.

 

As a result, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2018. As described in Part II, Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, of this Annual Report, we are implementing remedial measures that we believe will effectively remedy the material weakness. If we are unable to remediate the material weakness timely and sufficiently, or are otherwise unable to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, we could suffer future material misstatements in our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could harm our operating results and lead to a decline in our stock price. Additionally, ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject regulatory investigations, civil or criminal sanctions and class action litigation.

 

We must attract and retain skilled personnel. If we are unable to hire and retain technical, technical sales and operational employees, our business could be harmed.

 

Our ability to manage our reorganization and growth will be particularly dependent on our ability to develop and retain an effective sales force and qualified technical and managerial personnel. We need software development specialists with in-depth knowledge of a blend of IT and telecommunications or with a blend of security and telecom. We intend to hire additional necessary employees, including software engineers, communication engineers, project managers, sales consultants, employees and operational employees, on a permanent basis. The competition for qualified technical sales, technical, and managerial personnel in the communications and software industry is intense in the markets where we operate, and we may not be able to hire and retain sufficient qualified personnel. In addition, we may not be able to maintain the quality of our operations, control our costs, maintain compliance with all applicable regulations, and expand our internal management, technical, information and accounting systems in order to support our desired growth, which could have an adverse impact on our operations. Volatility in the stock market and other factors could diminish our use, and the value, of our equity awards as incentives to employees, putting us at a competitive disadvantage or forcing us to use more cash compensation.  Accordingly, our failure to attract and retain skilled personnel may materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

If we are not able to use and protect our intellectual property domestically and internationally, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Our ability to compete depends, in part, on our ability to use intellectual property internationally. We rely on a combination of patents, copyright, trade secrets and confidentiality, trademarks and licenses to protect our intellectual property. There is limited protection under patent law to protect the source codes we developed or acquired on our platform. The copyright and know-how protection on which we rely may not be sufficient. Our granted patents and pending patent applications may be challenged. We are also subject to the risks of claims and litigation alleging infringement of the intellectual property rights of others. The telecommunications industry is subject to frequent litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. We rely upon certain technology, including hardware and software, licensed from third parties. The technology licensed by us may not continue to provide competitive features and functionality. Licenses for technology currently used by us or other technology that we may seek to license in the future may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

 

We are dependent on one significant customer for our businesses and the loss of this customer could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

For the yearyears ended December 31, 2016,2019 and 2018, we had one significant customer which accounted for 82%20% and 64% of our revenue.revenue, respectively. Although no other customer accounted for greater than 10% of our net sales during this period, other customers may account for more than 10% of our net sales in future periods. TheAdditionally because many of our other customers produce net losses for us, the loss, or reduction in services to this significant customer or other discontinuation of their relationship with us for any reason, or if either of this significant customer reduces or postpones purchases that we expect to receive, it could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 


Our success depends on our continued investment in research and development, the level and effectiveness of which could reduce our profitability.

 

We intend to continue to make investments in research and development and product development in seeking to sustain and improve our competitive position and meet our customers’ needs. These investments currently include streamlining our suite of software functionalities, including modularization and improving scalability of our integrated solutions. To maintain our competitive position, we may need to increase our research and development investment, which could reduce our profitability and cash flows.flows, thereby causing a material and adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will achieve a return on these investments, nor can we assure you that these investments will improve our competitive position or meet our customers’ needs.

17

 

Product defects or software errors could adversely affect our business.

 

Design defects or software errors may cause delays in product introductions and project implementations, damage customer satisfaction and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our software systems are highly complex and may, from time to time, contain design defects or software errors that may be difficult to detect and correct. Because our products are generally used by our customers to perform critical business functions, design defects, software errors, misuse of our products, incorrect data from external sources or other potential problems within or outside of our control may arise during implementation or from the use of our products and may result in financial or other damages to our customers, for which we may be held responsible. Although we have license agreements with our customers that contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to potential claims and liabilities arising from customer problems, these provisions may not effectively protect us against such claims in all cases and in all jurisdictions. Our insurance coverage is not sufficient to protect against all possible liability for defects or software errors. In addition, as a result of business and other considerations, we may undertake to compensate our customers for damages caused to them arising from the use of our products, even if our liability is limited by a license or other agreement. Claims and liabilities arising from customer problems could also damage our reputation, adversely affecting our business, results of operations and the financial condition.

 

Political risks, including changes to United States tariff and import/export regulations may have a negative effect on our business.

There have been recent changes to United States trade policies, treaties and tariffs, including determinations made by the United States to reinstate or impose new sanctions levied by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) against certain nation states. The Company or its subsidiaries may engage in business with entities located in certain regions which may be impacted, directly or indirectly by such changes. If the Company is precluded as a result of changes to sanctions laws from doing business in certain jurisdictions or with certain entities, the loss of any related revenues could impact our business, results of operations and/or financial condition.

We, and certain of our directors and current and former officers, have been named as parties to various lawsuits and those lawsuits could adversely affect us, require significant management time and attention, result in significant legal expenses or damages, and cause our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows to suffer.

A number of lawsuits have been filed against us, including securities class action complaints. If these matters cannot be resolved expeditiously, management's attention may be diverted to this matter and there can be no assurance that the litigation would be settled.  If the current litigation proceeds or if additional claims are filed, the legal and other costs associated with the defense of these actions and their ultimate outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  While we expect insurance to cover many of the costs associated with defending such litigation, insurance coverage may be insufficient and could require a diversion of our resources.  There also may be adverse publicity associated with litigation that could negatively affect customer perception of our business, regardless of whether the allegations are valid or whether we are ultimately found liable.

Although we have directors and officers liability insurance, such insurance may be insufficient to cover the liabilities incurred under all claims and any claims against us may result in our incurring substantial costs and a diversion of resources.

Although we have directors and officers liability insurance, the coverage under such policies may be insufficient to cover any claim, including the claims pending against us and certain of our directors and officers resulting from the restatement of our financial statements (see “Item 3. Legal Proceedings”). Because we also have obligations to indemnify our current and former officers and directors under our governing documents, liabilities in excess of the limits of our insurance policies that may be imposed in connection with actions against certain of the Company’s past and present directors and officers and certain current and former employees who are entitled to indemnification will be funded by the Company with its existing cash resources. Such expenses could have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.


Risks Related to Our Industry

 

Changes in the regulation of the telecommunications industry could adversely affect our business, revenue or cash flow.

 

We operate in a heavily regulated industry. As a provider of communications technology, we are directly and indirectly subject to varying degrees of regulation in each of the jurisdictions in which we provide our services. Local laws and regulations, and the interpretation of such laws and regulations, differ significantly among the jurisdictions in which we operate. Enforcement and interpretations of these laws and regulations can be unpredictable and are often subject to the informal views of government officials. Certain European, foreign, federal, and state regulations and local franchise requirements have been, are currently, and may in the future be, the subject of judicial proceedings, legislative hearings and administrative proposals. Such proceedings may relate to, among other things, the rates we may charge for our local, network access and other services, the manner in which we offer and bundle our services, the terms and conditions of interconnection, unbundled network elements and resale rates, and could change the manner in which telecommunications companies operate. We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings or the impact they will have on our business, revenue and cash flow.

 

There can be no assurance that future regulatory changes will not have a material adverse effect on us, or that regulators or third parties will not raise material issues with regard toregarding our compliance or noncompliance with applicable regulations, any of which could have a material adverse effect upon us. Potential future regulatory, judicial, legislative, and government policy changes in jurisdictions where we operate could have a material adverse effect on us. Domestic or international regulators or third parties may raise material issues with regard toregarding our compliance or noncompliance with applicable regulations, and therefore may have a material adverse impact on our competitive position, growth and financial performance.

The market for communications services is highly competitive and fragmented, and we expect competition to continue to increase.

We compete with independent software and service providers and with the in-house IT and network departments of communications companies. Our main competitors include firms that provide communications services and IT services (including consulting, systems integration and managed services), software vendors that sell products for particular aspects of a total information system, software vendors that specialize in systems for particular communications services (such as Internet, wire line and wireless services, cable, satellite and service bureaus) and network equipment providers that offer software systems in combination with the sale of network equipment. We also compete with companies that provide digital commerce software and solutions.

18

 

The telecommunications industry is rapidly changing, and if we are not able to adjust our strategy and resources effectively in the future to meet changing market conditions, we may not be able to compete effectively.

 

The telecommunications industry is changing rapidly due to deregulation, privatization, consolidation, technological improvements, availability of alternative services such as mobile, broadband, DSL, Internet, VOIP, and wireless DSL through use of the fixed wireless spectrum, and the globalization of the world’s economies. In addition, alternative services to traditional land-line services, such as mobile, broadband, Internet and VOIP services, have shown a competitive threat to our legacy land-line traffic business. If we do not continue to invest and exploit our contemplated plan of development of our communications information systems, outsourced solutions and value addedvalue-added communication services to meet changing market conditions, or if we do not have adequate resources, we may not be able to compete effectively in providing technology solutions to our customers. The telecommunications industry is marked by the introduction of new product and service offerings and technological improvements. Achieving successful financial results will depend on our ability to anticipate, assess and adapt to rapid technological changes, and offer, on a timely and cost-effective basis, services including the bundling of multiple services into our technology platforms that meet evolving industry standards. If we do not anticipate, assess or adapt to such technological changes at a competitive price, maintain competitive services or obtain new technologies on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms, our financial results may be materially and adversely affected.

 

If we are not able to operate a cost-effective network, we may not be able to grow our business successfully.

 

Our long-term success depends on our ability to design, implement, operate, manage and maintain a reliable and cost-effective network. In addition, we rely on third parties to enable us to expand and manage our global network and to provide local, broadband Internet and mobile services. If we are unable to grow and operate a cost-effective network for our customers, our business may fail to grow or decline, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Risks Related to Our Capital Stock

 

Our stock price hasCovenant restrictions in our debt instruments may limit our flexibility to operate and grow our business, and if we are not able to comply with such covenants, our lenders could accelerate our indebtedness, proceed against certain collateral or exercise other remedies, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

On June 8, 2020, we closed the issuance of $17.5 million aggregate principal amount of our Senior Secured Convertible Notes due 2025 (the “2020 Note”) under the terms of a securities purchase agreement, also dated as of June 8, 2020 (together with the 2020 Note, the “Note Facility”). The covenants in the past not met,Note Facility documents contain a number of provisions that impose operating and may in the future not meet, the minimum bid price for continued listing on the NYSE MKT. Ourfinancial restrictions which, subject to certain exceptions, limit our ability to publicly or privately sell equity securities and the liquidityability of our subsidiaries to, among other things: incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends or make distributions or redeem or repurchase our securities, make certain investments, grant liens on assets, sell or dispose of any material assets; and acquire the assets of, or merge or consolidate with, other companies. Additionally, the Note Facility documents contain affirmative covenants that require to us take, and have taken by certain dates, specific actions, some of which have not been satisfied by the dates required, including (i) us filing our restated financial statements with the SEC on or prior to October 31, 2020,  (ii) after October 31, 2020, our timely filing subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q with the SEC and (iii) us maintaining the listing of our common stock could be adversely affected if we are delisted fromon the NYSE MKT.

We receivedNasdaq Stock Market. As a deficiency letter from the NYSE MKTresult, on December 6, 2016, indicating that our securities had been selling for1, 2020, we entered into a low price per share for a substantial period of time and, pursuant to Section 1003(f)(v)forbearance agreement with the holder of the NYSE MKT Company Guide (the “Company Guide”), our continued listing on the NYSE MKT was predicated on our effecting a reverse split or otherwise demonstrating sustained price improvement. This notice was in addition to a prior notice2020 Note under which we received from NYSE MKT on May 26, 2016, as previously disclosed on a Current Report on Form 8-K we filed on June 2, 2016. The NYSE MKT indicatedadmitted that we had an additional six months,were in default of several obligations and such holder acknowledged such defaults and agreed not to exercise any right or remedy under the Note Facility documents, including its right to accelerate the aggregate amount outstanding under the 2020 Note, until June 6, 2017,the earlier of December 31, 2020, the date of any new event of default or the initiation of any action by the Company to gain compliance with Section 1003(f)(v)invalidate any of the Company Guide.representations and warranties made in such forbearance agreement.

 


On February 27, 2017, we completed a 1-for-25 reverse splitComplying with these covenants, as well as those that may be contained in any future debt agreements, may limit our ability to finance our future operations or working capital needs or to take advantage of our issued and outstanding common stock. Although we believe we have regained compliance with Section 1003(f)(v) of the Company Guide, there can be no assurance that our common stock will continue to satisfy this rule. If we were to failfuture business opportunities. Our ability to comply with the Section 1003(f)(v)these covenants will depend on our future performance, which may be affected by events beyond our control. If we do not maintain and regain compliance with our continuing obligations or any covenants, terms and conditions of the Company Guide againNote Facility, after the expiration of the forbearance agreement, we could be in default and required to repay outstanding borrowings on an accelerated basis, which could subject us to decreased liquidity and other negative impacts on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In the future and became subjectcase of an event of default, we may not have sufficient funds available to delisting, such delisting from NYSE MKT would adversely affectmake the required payments under the Note Facility. If we are unable to repay amounts owed under the terms of our abilityNote Facility, the lenders thereunder may choose to raise additional financing throughexercise their remedies in respect to the public or privatecollateral, including a foreclosure of their lien which may result in a sale of equity securities, would significantly affect the ability of investors to trade our securities and would negatively affect the value and liquiditycertain of our common stock. Delisting also could have other negative results, includingassets to satisfy our obligations under the potential loss of confidence by employees, the loss of institutional investor interest and fewer business development opportunities.Note Facility.

 

We could issue additional common stock, which might dilute the book value of our capital stock.

 

Our Board of Directors has authority, without action or vote of our stockholders, to issue all or a part of our authorized but unissued shares of common stock. Any such stock issuance could be made at a price that reflects a discount or a premium to the then-current trading price of our common stock. In addition, in order to raise future capital, we may need to issue securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for a significant amount of our common stock. These issuances, if any, would dilute your percentage ownership interest in the company,Company, thereby having the effect of reducing your influence on matters on which stockholders vote. You may incur additional dilution if holders of stock options, whether currently outstanding or subsequently granted, exercise their options, or if warrant holders exercise their warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. As a result, any such issuances or exercises would dilute your interest in the companyCompany and the per share book value of the common stock that you owned, either of which could negatively affect the trading price of our common stock and the value of your investment.

 

19

As a “thinly-traded” stock, large sales can place downward pressure on our stock price.

Our stock experiences periods when it could be considered “thinly traded”. Financing transactions resulting in a large number of newly issued shares that become readily tradable, or other events that cause current stockholders to sell shares, could place further downward pressure on the trading price of our stock. In addition, the lack of a robust resale market may require a stockholder who desires to sell a large number of shares to sell the shares in increments over time to mitigate any adverse impact of the sales on the market price of our stock.

Shares eligible for future sale may adversely affect the market for our common stock.

 

As of March 23, 2017,September 30, 2020, there are 1,549,931 options and 4,292,403 warrants to purchase(i) 8,123,284 shares of our common stock outstanding. Allthat may be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, 52,462,384 shares of common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of outstanding warrants and 29,1666,667 shares issuable from exercise have been registered and are freely traded.of common stock that may be issued upon the conversion of outstanding convertible indebtedness. Options are exercisable at exercise prices between $1.32$3.71 and $23.25,$62.50 and the warrants are exercisable at exercise prices between $1.875$0.37 and $23.25.$5.38. Accrued interest owed on the 2020 Note may also be paid in the form of shares of our common stock from time to time. If and when these securities are exercised or converted into shares of our common stock, the number of our shares of common stock outstanding will increase. Such increase in our outstanding shares, and any subsequent sales of such shares, could have a material adverse effect on the market for our common stock and the market price of our common stock.

 

In addition, from time to time, certain of our stockholders may be eligible to sell all or some of their shares of common stock by means of ordinary brokerage transactions in the open market pursuant to Rule 144, promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), subject to certain limitations. In general, pursuant to Rule 144, after satisfying a six month holding period: (i) affiliated stockholders (or stockholders whose shares are aggregated) may, under certain circumstances, sell within any three month period a number of securities which does not exceed the greater of 1% of the then outstanding shares of common stock or the average weekly trading volume of the class during the four calendar weeks prior to such sale and (ii) non-affiliated stockholders may sell without such limitations, provided that we are current in our public reporting obligations. Rule 144 also permits the sale of securities by non-affiliates that have satisfied a one year holding period without any limitation or restriction. Any substantial sale of our common stock pursuant to Rule 144 or pursuant to any resale prospectus may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our securities.

 


Because certain principal stockholders own a large percentageOur common stock is quoted on the OTC Markets Group Inc.’s Pink Open Market which may have an unfavorable impact on our stock price and liquidity.

On November 10, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) notified the Company that, because of the Company’s failure to satisfy the conditions to the exception to Nasdaq’s listing standards granted by the Nasdaq Hearings Panel, our common stock would be delisted, and trading of our votingcommon stock other stockholders’ voting power may be limited.

Ason Nasdaq’s Capital Market was suspended effective at the open of March 27, 2017,business on November 12, 2020. After trading of the Company’s common stock was suspended by Nasdaq, prices for our three large shareholders: Corbin Mezzanine Fund I, L.P., Saffelberg Investments N.V., and Mr. Bernard Moncarey ownedcommon stock began being quoted on the OTC Markets Group Inc.’s Pink Open Market (the “Pink Sheets”). The Pink Sheets is a significantly more limited market than Nasdaq or controlled approximately 27.3%the New York Stock Exchange. The quotation of our outstanding common stock. If thoseshares on the Pink Sheets may result in a less liquid market available for existing and potential stockholders act together, they will have the ability to have a substantial influence on matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election and removal of directors and the approval of any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially alltrade shares of our assets. As a result, our other stockholders may have little or no influence over matters submitted for shareholder approval. In addition,common stock, could depress the ownership of such stockholders could preclude any unsolicited acquisition of us, and consequently, adversely affect thetrading price of our common stock.stock and could have a long-term adverse impact on our ability to raise capital in the future on favorable terms, or at all.

Because our common stock is no longer listed on a registered national securities exchange, we are subject to certain “blue sky” laws of the various states which impose restrictions on our ability to offer and sell our securities. These stockholders“blue sky” laws may make decisionsit more difficult for us to raise capital or to issue our common stock for equity compensation or other strategic purposes, which could adversely affect our ability to fund our operations or to attract and retain employees.

In addition, our common stock may be classified as a “penny stock” under Rule 3a51-1 under the Exchange Act. “Penny stocks” are subject to Rule 15g-9, which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers that aresell low-priced securities to persons other than established customers and institutional accredited investors. For transactions covered by this rule, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to sale. Consequently, the rule may affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our common stock and affect the ability of holders to sell their shares of our common stock in the secondary market. To the extent our common stock is subject to the penny stock regulations, the market liquidity for the shares will be adversely affected and could have a long-term adverse impact on our ability to your interests.raise capital in the future on favorable terms, or at all.

 

We have no dividend history and have no intention to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

We have never paid dividends on or in connection with our common stock and do not intend to pay any dividends to common stockholders for the foreseeable future.

 

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

 

Item 2.   Properties

 

We do not own any properties, but lease office space in the various countries for our shared service centers and lease data center locations for housing our equipment, applications and network interconnections to our customers and telecommunication network providers.

 

20

Our office in the United States is located at 1185 Avenue of the Americas, 37th Floor, New York, NY 10036. We lease this space pursuant to a lease which continues month to month. Our Pareteum office in The Netherlands is located at Wattstraat 52, 2171 TR, Sassenheim,Hornweg 7, 1432 GD Aalsmeer, The Netherlands, wherefore the contract is automatically renewed every month. 6 months.

The quarterly feeArtilium Dutch office is located at Soesterberg, Laan Blussé van oud Alblas 2a where we lease 500 square meters until December 31, 2020. Our Artilium Belgian offices are located at Bruges, Vaartdijkstraat 19 where we lease 580 square meters. The contract continues month by month and can be terminated with a 6-month notice. The main office is located at Rotselaar, Wingepark 5b for thiswhich we lease 269 square meters until August 2025. The contract can be terminated every 3-year period with a 6-month notice. We rent a shop in Lommel, Michiel Jansplein 28, of 50 square meters. The contract can be terminated every 3-year period (first period ending December 31, 2019) with a 6-month notice. The Indonesian office for Artilium is $4,530.located at the IB Building 4th floor, Jalang Imam Bonjol 163, 50132, Semarang. We rent 33 square meters which continues year by year with a 1-month notice. The German office for Artilium is located at Lubeck, Maria-Goeppert Street 7. We lease 155 square meters which continues month by month and can be terminated with a 9-month notice.

In Spain we currently rent office space for Pareteum at Paratge Bujonis, 17220 Sant Feliu de Guixols, (Girona) Spain, at a monthly rent of $2,804.Spain. This contract is valid till April 2017.continues on a month to month basis. In addition, the Company rents office space at Av. Dr. Severo Ochoa 36, 28100 Alcobendas, (Madrid) Spain for $1,618 perSpain. This contract also continues on a month valid till February 2018.to month basis. The Company rents office space in Lehmedeh, Bahrain for $1,008 per month. Thepursuant to a contract that is valid tilluntil December 2017.2019. iPass currently leases approximately 25,000 square feet of space for iPass’s headquarters in Redwood Shores, California. iPass signed a lease renewal effective May 1, 2015, that expires in January 2020. iPass also leases sales and support offices abroad in EMEA and Asia Pacific.

 


We also rent space for our telecom switches, servers and IT platforms at data centers (“co-locations”) at an aggregate monthly rent of $17,480. The various co-location spaces include: Amsterdam, Madrid, Barcelona, Oostkamp, Tongeren and other locations where our telecommunications equipment is located.

 

We believe the facilities currently under rent are adequate for our present activities and those additional facilities are available on competitive market terms to provide for such future expansion of our operations as may be warranted.

 

Item 3.   Legal Proceedings (Restated)

telSPACE -vs- Elephant Talk et al.,AAA Case No. 01-16-0003-8242.

Claimant commenced this AAA arbitration on or about September 7, 2016 by the filing of a statement of claim. Claimant asserted claims arising out of Software Licensing Agreements (“Licensing Agreements”) entered into by Claimant and mCash Holdings LLC (together, “Licensors”), on the one hand, and Telnicity LLC, on the other, which Telnicity subsequently assigned to the Company.  Pursuant to the Licensing Agreements, the Company obtained the license to use certain intellectual property in exchange for monthly payments to the Licensors.  Claimant alleged that the Company failed to make monthly payments from on or about November 2015, causing the Licensors to terminate the Licensing Agreements, and continued using Licensors’ intellectual property after such termination.  Based on these allegations, Claimant asserted claims for breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secret, and copyright infringement.  Claimant seeks unspecified damages, specific performance, prejudgment interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs.

On October 31, 2016, the Company filed a statement of answer denying Claimant’s claims.  On January 5, 2017, the arbitration panel scheduled the hearing for April 13, 2017.  The Parties have conducted limited discovery, which concluded on February 28, 2017.  On March 10, 2017, Claimant requested leave to move for a default judgment against the Company for failing to advance the AAA administrative fees, and for sanctions based on alleged spoliation of evidence.  On March 15, 2017, the Arbitration Chair denied Claimant’s request for leave to move for default, and granted Claimant’s request for leave to move for sanctions.  The Arbitration will proceed in Seattle, WA, on April 13, 2017.

21

Other.

 

We are involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to our business.  In the opinion of management, other than those matters set forth below, the ultimate resolution of such claims and lawsuits will not have a material effect on our financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.

SEC Subpoenas. As previously disclosed, the Audit Committee of the Company’s board of directors conducted an internal investigation into the source of the accounting errors causing the restatement. As a result of this investigation, the Company has instituted, and will continue to implement and evaluate, additional remedial measures and internal controls to ensure that it has the right processes, people and discipline in place.

Sec Investigation. August 2019 and February 2020, the SEC issued the Company subpoenas requiring the production of documents related to, among other things, the Company’s recognition of revenue, practices with certain customers, and internal accounting controls. The SEC investigation is ongoing and the Company and the SEC staff are engaged in preliminary discussions regarding a potential resolution of the investigation. We express no opinion as to the outcome of this matter.

In re Pareteum Securities Litigation is the consolidation of various putative class actions that were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The court consolidated the actions on January 10, 2020 and named the Pareteum Shareholder Investor Group as the Lead Plaintiff. The Lead Plaintiff is asserting claims on behalf of purported purchasers and/or acquirers of Company securities between December 14, 2017 and October 21, 2019. The defendants are the Company, Robert H. Turner, Edward O’Donnell, Victor Bozzo, Denis McCarthy, Dawson James Securities Inc., and Squar Milner (“Defendants”). The Lead Plaintiff alleges that Defendants caused the company to issue certain materially false or misleading statements in SEC filings and other public pronouncements in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. Lead Plaintiff seeks to recover compensatory damages with interest for itself and the other class members for all damages sustained as a result of Defendants’ alleged wrongdoing and reasonable costs and attorney’s fees incurred in the case.

Miller ex rel. Pareteum Corporation v. Victor Bozzo, et al. was filed on February 28, 2020 in the Supreme Court for the State of New York, New York County. It is a stockholder derivative suit brought by Plaintiff William Miller (“Plaintiff”), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, the Company, against certain officers and directors of Pareteum, including Victor Bozzo, Laura Thomas, Yves van Sante, Luis Jimenez-Tunon, Robert Lippert, Robert H. Turner, Edward O’Donnell, and Denis McCarthy (the “Individual Defendants”). Plaintiff alleges that the Individual Defendants caused the company to issue false or misleading statements in Securities Exchange Commission filings and other public pronouncements in violation of certain federal securities regulations. Plaintiff alleges that as a result of their misconduct, the Individual Defendants are liable for violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement and waste of corporate assets. Plaintiff seeks a judgment awarding Pareteum damages with interest sustained as a result of the Individual Defendants’ alleged misconduct, directing the Individual Defendants to take certain measures to reform and improve Pareteum’s corporate governance and internal procedures, awarding Pareteum restitution from the Individual Defendants, and awarding Plaintiff all costs and expenses incurred in pursuing the claims.


Zhang ex rel. Pareteum Corporation v. Robert H. Turner, et al. was filed on May 26, 2020 in the Supreme Court for the State of New York, New York County. It is a stockholder derivative suit brought by Plaintiff Wei Zhang (“Plaintiff”), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, the Company, against certain officers and directors of Pareteum, including Robert H. Turner, Edward O’Donnell, Denis McCarthy, Victor Bozzo, Rob Mumby, Luis Jimenez-Tunon, Robert Lippert, Laura Thomas, and Yves van Sante (the “Individual Defendants”). Plaintiff alleges that the Individual Defendants caused the company to issue false or misleading statements in Securities Exchange Commission filings and other public pronouncements in violation of certain federal securities regulations. Plaintiff alleges that as a result of their misconduct, the Individual Defendants are liable for violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement and waste of corporate assets. Plaintiff seeks a judgment awarding Pareteum damages with interest sustained as a result of the Individual Defendants’ alleged misconduct, directing the Individual Defendants to take certain measures to reform and improve Pareteum’s corporate governance and internal procedures, awarding Pareteum restitution from the Individual Defendants, and awarding Plaintiff all costs and expenses incurred in pursing the claim.

Shaw ex. rel. Pareteum Corporation v. Luis Jimenez-Tunon, et al. was filed on July 10, 2020 in the Supreme Court for the State of New York, New York County. It is a stockholder derivative suit brought by Plaintiff Michael Shaw (“Plaintiff”), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, the Company, against certain officers and directors of Pareteum, including Luis Jimenez-Tunon, Robert Lippert, Yves Van Sante, Robert H. Turner, Edward O’Donnell, Denis McCarthy, Victor Bozzo, and Laura Thomas (the “Individual Defendants”). Plaintiff alleges that the Individual Defendants caused the company to issue false or misleading statements in Securities Exchange Commission filings and other public pronouncements in violation of certain federal securities regulations. Plaintiff alleges that as a result of their misconduct, the Individual Defendants are liable for violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets. Plaintiff seeks a judgment awarding Pareteum damages sustained as a result of the Individual Defendants’ alleged misconduct, directing the Individual Defendants to take certain measures to reform and improve Pareteum’s corporate governance and internal procedures, and awarding Plaintiff all costs and expenses incurred in the Shaw Action.

In re Pareteum Corporation Stockholder Derivative Litigation (the “Delaware Derivative Action”) is a consolidated action that was originally filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and joins several related derivative actions. Specifically, on April 3, 2020, the District Court consolidated related suits brought by stockholders Edward Hayes, Juanita Silvera, and Brad Linton (“Plaintiffs”), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, the Company, against certain officers and directors of Pareteum, including Robert H. Turner, Edward O’Donnell, Denis McCarthy, Laura Thomas, Victor Bozzo, Luis Jimenez-Tunon, Robert Lippert, Rob Mumby and Yves Van Sante (the “Individual Defendants”). Plaintiffs in the related actions have alleged that the Individual Defendants caused Pareteum to issue false or misleading statements in Securities Exchange Commission filings and other public pronouncements in violation of certain federal securities regulations. Plaintiffs allege that as a result of the Individual Defendants’ misconduct, they are liable for violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and gross mismanagement. Plaintiffs seek a judgment (1) declaring that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties and/or aided and abetted the breach of their fiduciary duties; (2) awarding Pareteum damages sustained as a result of the Individual Defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duty and violations of federal securities laws; (3) ordering that the Individual Defendants disgorge any performance-based compensation that was received during, or as a result of, the Individual Defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duty; (4) directing the Individual Defendants to take certain measures to reform and improve Pareteum’s corporate governance and internal procedures; (5) granting appropriate equitable or injunctive relief to remedy the Individual Defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duties and other violations of laws; (6) awarding Pareteum restitution from the Individual Defendants; and (7) awarding Plaintiff all costs and expenses incurred in the Related Suits and Delaware Derivative Action. On July 22, 2020, this action was transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Since that transfer, a docket has not yet been opened in the Southern District of New York and Plaintiffs have yet to file a complaint.

Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd. v. Pareteum Corp., et al., No. 19-cv-10460 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Section 11 Action”), is an action brought under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 by an investor, Sabby Volatility Master Fund, Ltd. (“Plaintiff”), against the Company, Robert H. Turner, Edward O’Donnell, Denis McCarthy, Victor Bozzo, Robert Lippert, Yves Van Sante, and Luis Jimenez Tunon (collectively, the “Defendants”). It was filed on Nov. 11, 2019. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants caused the company to issue false or misleading statements in a Registration Statement filed with the Securities Exchange Commission. As a result of the alleged misconduct, Plaintiff claims that Defendants are liable for violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act, breaches of a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) entered into between Plaintiff and Pareteum, and contractual indemnification allegedly owed to Plaintiff under the SPA. Plaintiff seeks monetary damages and/or rescission of the SPA, and indemnification by Pareteum for any losses resulting from its alleged breach of the SPA, including costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Section 11 Action.

Artilium Africa, LLC et al. v. Artilium, PLC et al.; ICDR Case No. 01-19-0003-1680 and Artilium Africa, LLC and Tristar Africa Telecom, LLC v. Pareteum Corporation are related matters arising out of the same dispute. The former matter is an arbitration filed with the International Center for Dispute Resolution on October 1, 2019 alleging that Artilium Group Limited, a subsidiary of Pareteum Corporation formerly known as Artilium PLC (“Artilium”), breached an Operating Agreement relating to a joint venture called Artilium Africa formed by Artilium Green Globe Services LLC and Tristar Africa Telecom, LLC (“Tristar”) to provide mobile data, cloud, and telecommunications services throughout Africa. The Claimants in the ICDR arbitration are seeking $30 million. The latter matter is a civil case filed on October 10, 2019 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The Plaintiffs in the Delaware case allege that Pareteum Corporation tortuously interfered with Tristar’s contract with Artilium in order to enter into the same type of agreement with Artilium. The Plaintiffs are seeking $150,000 in damages.


Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable.

Part II

 

Item 5.  Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (Restated)

 

Since December 5, 2011, ourOur common stock was listed for quotation on the ExchangeNasdaq Capital Market, and traded under the symbol “ETAK.“TEUM.” As ofOn November 1, 2016,10, 2020, Nasdaq notified us by letter that our common stock has begunwould be delisted and, accordingly, trading underof our common stock on Nasdaq’s Capital Market was suspended effective at the symbol “TEUM”open of business on the Exchange.  The following table sets forth the highNovember 12, 2020 and low closing prices per share for each quarterly period from March 31, 2015 through December 31, 2016 asour common stock have since been quoted on the Exchange and published bywww.nasdaq.com. These quotations reflect prices between dealers and do not include retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions and may not reasonably represent actual transactions.OTC Markets Group Inc.’s Pink Open Market.

 

  Common Stock 
Quarter Ended High  Low 
December 31, 2016 $5.2475  $2.4500 
September 30, 2016 $4.7500  $3.0000 
June 30, 2016 $5.7475  $3.7625 
March 31, 2016 $6.9975  $4.7750 
December 31, 2015 $12.2500  $5.7500 
September 30, 2015 $15.7500  $6.8750 
June 30, 2015 $12.0000  $8.5000 
March 31, 2015 $21.0000  $9.2500 

As of March 29, 2017,October 31, 2020, we had approximately 4,137 record3,751 recorded holders of our common stock.

Dividends

 

We have not declared any cash dividends since inception and do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends is within the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, and other relevant factors. There are no restrictions that currently limit our ability to pay dividends on our common stock other than those generally imposed by applicable state law.

 

22

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

 

Plan Category Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
the equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
    Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
(a)
 Weighted-
average
exercise
prices of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
(b)
 Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future
issuance under
the equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 2008 Plan (1):  203,266  $10.74   843,781 
 (a) (b) (c)  2017 Plan (2):  3,941,103  $1.00   (648,014)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  2006 Plan (1): 0
2008 Plan (2): 1,040,211
   2006 Plan: n/a
2008 Plan: $13.25
   2006 Plan: 0
2008 Plan: 586,636
 
 2018 Plan (3):  1,000,000  $-   5,732,088 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  -   -   -    -  $-   - 
Total  1,040,211   -   586,636     5,144,369       5,927,855 

 

(1)Relates to the 2008 Pareteum Corp. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2008 Plan”). The Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 filed July 21, 2006.

(2)S-8 filedwith the SEC on July 11, 2008.2008 to register the offering and sale of the shares of common stock underlying the awards issued under the 2008 Plan. The stockholders approved the increase of the total number of shares of authorized to be issued under the 2008 Plan from 200,000 to 920,000, during 2013 the stockholders approved an increase from 920,000 to 1,840,000 and during 2014 an increase of the total number of shares available under the 2008 Plan from 1,840,000 to 2,240,000.

(2)Relates to the 2017 Pareteum Corp. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2017 Plan”). The stockholders approved 6,500,000 shares to be issued under the 2017 Plan, the offer and sale of 3,500,000 of which were registered under a registration statement on Form S-8 filed by the Company with the SEC on June 14, 2017 and the offer and sale of 3,000,000 of which shares were registered under a registration statement on Form S-8 filed by the Company with the SEC on April 13, 2018. Due to administrative error, the Company issued options exercisable for 648,014 more shares of common stock than were approved under the 2017 Plan. Accordingly, the Company expects to amend the 2017 Plan and register the issuance of the excess shares with the SEC prior to the exercise of such excess options.

(3)Relates to the 2018 Pareteum Corp. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2018 Plan”). The Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on October 10, 2018 to register the offering and sale of the shares of common stock underlying the awards issued under the 2008 Plan. The shareholders approved 8,000,000 common shares to be issued under the 2018 Plan, of which 8,000,000 were registered under the S-8. During 2018, 1,267,912 common shares have been issued at zero cost to certain executives.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Other than as set forth below or as previously disclosed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we did not sell any equity securities during the year ended December 31, 2018, in transactions that were not registered under the Securities Act. The issuance of such securities was made in transactions exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and/or Rule 506 promulgated thereunder.

During the Company’s first quarter ended March 31, 2018, the Company issued 47,937 unregistered shares of common stock in connection with the receipt of certain financial services, and 30,000 unregistered shares of common stock in connection with the receipt of certain investor relations services.

During the Company’s second quarter ended June 30, 2018, the Company issued 13,400 unregistered shares of common stock in connection with the receipt of certain consulting services, and 45,000 unregistered shares of common stock in connection with the receipt of certain investor relations services.

During the Company’s third quarter ended September 30, 2018, the Company issued 31,250 unregistered shares of common stock in connection with the receipt of certain advisory services.

During the Company’s fourth quarter ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued 39,750 unregistered shares of common stock in connection with a certain settlement arrangement.


Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

 

We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Regulation S-K and as such, are not required to provide the information contained in this item pursuant to Regulation S-K.

 

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Restated)

 

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K/A. In addition to historical consolidated financial statements, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. See “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K.10-K/A and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in the forepart of this Form 10-K/A.

 

Business overviewOverview

 

Pareteum has developedCorporation (OTC: TEUM) is aCommunications Cloud Services Platform, providing (i) Mobility, (ii) Messaging growth oriented cloud software communications platform company with a mission - to Connect Every Person and (iii) SecurityEvery(Thing) ™. Pareteum’s goal is to unleash the power of applications and mobile services, bringing secure, ubiquitous, scalable, and seamlessly available voice, video, SMS/text messaging, and data services to our customers, making worldwide communications services easily and economically accessible to everyone. By harnessing the value of our cloud communications platform, Pareteum serves enterprises, communications service providers, early-stage innovators, developers, IoT and telecommunications infrastructure providers.

Pareteum integrates a variety of disparate communications methods and services and applications,offers them to customers and application developers, allowing communications to become a value-added service. The vast majority of our platform is comprised of our self-developed software and intellectual property, which provides our customers with a Single-Sign-On, APIflexibility in how they use our products and allows us to be market driven going forward. We have approximately 73 patents granted in relation to techniques and processes which support our cloud software development suite:and communications platform solutions. Our platform services partners (technologies integrated into our cloud) include: HPE, IBM, Sonus, Oracle, Microsoft, NetNumber, Affirmed and other world-class technology providers.

 

 The Pareteum cloud communications platform targets large and growing sectors from IoT, Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNO), Smart Cities, and Application developer markets - each in need of mobile platforms, management and connectivity. These sectors need Communications-Platform-as-a-Service (CPaaS), which Pareteum delivers. Our vision is to empower Communication Service Providers, Enterprises and Developers to simply create and control their own wireless communications products and experiences through our powerful combination of software, services and global connectivity.

 

Our solutionPareteum Corporation, a Delaware corporation, was originally formed in 2001 as Elephant Talk Communications Corp. as a result of a merger between Staruni Corporation (USA, 1962) and Elephant Talk Limited (Hong Kong, 1994). Since 2016, our name has proven itself globally against much larger competitorsbeen Pareteum Corporation and our common stock is installed in multiple companies in diverse countries aroundlisted on the world ranging from small service providers to oneNasdaq Capital Market under the ticker symbol “TEUM.” On November 10, 2020, Nasdaq notified the Company by letter that the Company’s common stock would be delisted and, accordingly, trading of the world’s largest telecoms companies, Vodafone, basedCompany’s common stock on Nasdaq’s Capital Market was suspended effective at the open of business on November 12, 2020.

Coronavirus Pandemic

In March 2020, COVID-19 began spreading across the globe and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization; the President of the United States declared this a national emergency. The economic effects of the pandemic and resulting social changes are not predictable.  There are a number of uncertainties arising from COVID-19 that could impact our operating results: the effectiveness of COVID-19 mitigation measures, the duration of the pandemic, and the effect on global economic conditions. Likewise, business operational changes, work from home, school from home and shop from home all impact consumer confidence and the availability of supply chain to support these activities. We expect operating and financial results to continue to be adversely impacted by COVID-19 for the duration of the pandemic.

We see an increase in Europe.usage consumption, particularly for messaging and consumer mobile services. However, our products and services for customers in the travel and hospitality industries remain negatively impacted. We had more than 1,100,000 active subscribers onexpect volatility in customer demand and consumption habits as the pandemic continues, and we may experience constrained supply or curtailed customer demand that could adversely impact our platformsoperations. Specifically, we see slowed sales cycles, including customers and prospective customers delaying contract signatures or renewals. Customers in the pipeline are uncertain and may minimize commitments related to the products and services that we offer.


Restatement and Revision of Previously Issued Financial Statements

As described in Note 1, “Restatement” to our audited consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this amended Annual Report, we restated our audited financial statements as of December 31, 2016.2018 and for the year then ended. The impact of the restatement is reflected in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”). We have also restated certain unaudited quarterly results related to the three months ended March 31, 2018, the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. This MD&A also gives effect to these quarterly restatement adjustments to our previously filed Forms 10-Q. For additional discussion regarding the quarterly restatement, see Note 27, Unaudited Quarterly Data (Restated) to the Notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this amended Annual Report under the caption Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

 

The marketDelisting of the Company’s Common Stock

On November 5, 2020, the Company notified the Nasdaq Hearings Panel that it would not be able to file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2019, its amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2018, its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 or its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended March 31, 2020 and our customers tell usJune 30, 2020 by November 9, 2020, the date by which the Hearings Panel had required the Company to make such filings in order for the Company’s common stock to remain listed on Nasdaq.

In response to the Company’s notice to Nasdaq that they needit would not satisfy the conditions to find waysthe exception to reduce cost, they want to find ways to increase their revenues,the listing requirements granted by the Hearing Panel, Nasdaq notified the Company by letter dated November 10, 2020 that the Company’s common stock would be delisted, and they want to scale and grow theirtrading of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq��s Capital Market was suspended effective at the open of business and all consider Cloud capabilities as a vital means to achieve these goals. As we’ve listened to our customers and understoodon November 12, 2020. Since the business goals that they have, we believe Pareteum is well placed to help them achieve these goals, drive value for customers, and ultimately valuetrading of the Company’s common stock was suspended by Nasdaq, prices for our own business.

23

Wecommon stock have designed a solution that solves these problems. Each of thesethree platforms - mobility, messaging and security - can be marketed and deployed independently, or they can be delivered as a single, integrated Cloud Service Platform, as illustrated in the figure above.

The Pareteum platform hosts integrated IT/Back Office and Core Network functionality for mobile network operators, and for enterprises implement and leverage mobile communications solutions on a fully outsourced SaaS, PaaS and/or IaaS basis: made available either as an on-premise solution or as a fully hosted service in the Cloud dependingbeen quoted on the needs of our customers. Pareteum also delivers an Operational Support System (“OSS”) for channel partners, with Application Program Interfaces (“APIs”) for integration with third party systems, workflows for complex application orchestration, customer support with branded portals and plug-ins for a multitude of other applications. These features facilitate and improve the ability of our channel partners to provide support and to drive sales.OTC Markets Group Inc.’s Pink Open Market.

Our integrated (or modular) Cloud Platform solution includes, more specifically, functionality such as service design and control, Intelligent Networking, subscriber provisioning, messaging, switching, real-time dynamic rating and pre- or post-paid charging and billing, call center and customer care support, reporting, self-care web portal environments, change management in active systems, SIM Management, (Data) Session Control Management, Voucher Management, Mobile Marketing systems, (Mobile) Payment Systems, Real Time Credit Checking Systems, Interactive Voice Response Systems, Voicemail Systems, Trouble Ticketing Systems, Device Management Systems, Mass Customer Migrations, life cycle management, database hardware and software, large scale real-time processing, and integrating, provisioning, all the while managing and maintaining specific core network components.

Company Milestone Overview

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto and the other financial information included elsewhere in this document.

Operational Highlights:

·Elephant Talk Communications Corp. was renamed Pareteum Corporation, effective November 1, 2016;
·We trade on the NYSE MKT under the ticker symbol: TEUM;
·Pareteum derives from the words Pareto (referring to the Pareto Principle) and “team”;
·Pareteum named its first CEO: Vic Bozzo, who brings 20+ years of experience in the communication arena and very successful sales executive roles over the last 20 years;
·The Company sold its subsidiary, ValidSoft, for $3 million, ($2 million cash and $1 million note), and eliminated negative EBITDA impact of over $2 million annualized;
·Decreased headcount or full time equivalents (“FTEs”) from 253 FTEs on December 31, 2015 to 62 FTEs on December 31, 2016;
·Closed business units no longer core to operations and reduced suppliers, vendors, and services costs;
·Raised $6 million ($3.5 million PIPE (March 2016) and $2.5 million from Preferred Share issuances in equity capital;
·Borrowed additional $1.2 million (August 2016) and then subsequently paid $2 million to senior lender Atalaya, following the sale of ValidSoft (December 31, 2016);
·NYSE Listing Compliance Plan accepted by the Exchange subject to monthly, then quarterly, reviews to ensure that the plan is on track;
·Registration Statements: S-3 filed;
·PIPE Unit Holder Conversions have begun and further conversions are underway, thereby boosting shareholder equity on the balance sheet.

24

 

Results of Operations

 

Although the majority of our cost basebusiness activity is carried out in Euros, we report our financial statements in U.S. dollars (“USD”). The conversion of Euros and USD leads to period-to-period fluctuations in our reported USD results arising from changes in the exchange rate between the USD and the Euro. Generally, when the USD strengthens relative to the Euro, it has an unfavorable impact on our reported revenue and income and a favorable impact on our reported expenses. Conversely, when the USD weakens relative to the Euro, it produces a favorable impact on our reported revenue and income, and an unfavorable impact on our reported expenses. The aboveThese fluctuations in the USD/Euro exchange rate therefore result in currency translation effects (not to be confused with real currency exchange effects), which impact our reported USD results and may make it difficult to determine actual increases and decreases in our revenue and expenses which are attributable to our actual operating activities. We carry out our business activities primarily in Euros, and we do not currently engage in hedging activities.

 

The following table shows the USD equivalent of the major currencies used to translate our financial results for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015:2017:

 

 USD  USD 
 equivalent  Equivalent 
 2016 2015  2018 2017 
Euro  1.05356   1.09064  1.18102 1.13002 
British Pound  1.23016   1.48017  1.33501 1.28873 


Our results of operations for the periods presented were as follows:

  Year Ended December 31,    
  2018  2017  

Change

Increase(decrease)

 
  (as restated)       
REVENUES $20,257,605  $13,547,507  $6,710,098 
             
COST AND OPERATING EXPENSES            
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization)  10,054,030   3,683,609   6,370,421 
Product development  3,082,956   1,479,587   1,603,369 
Sales & Marketing  3,197,406   1,575,069   1,622,337 
General & administrative  17,329,163   10,097,027   7,232,136 
Restructuring and acquisition costs  7,259,561   966,292   6,293,269 
Depreciation and amortization  5,427,029   4,533,109   893,920 
Total cost and operating expenses  46,350,145   22,334,693   24,015,452 
             
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (26,092,540)  (8,787,186)  17,305,354 
             
Interest income  184,511   172,253   12,258 
Interest expense  (308,742)  (1,654,418)  (1,345,676)
Interest expense related to debt discount and conversion feature  (184,308)  (3,408,735)  (3,224,427)
Changes in derivative liabilities  1,283,914   794,691   489,223 
Gain on extinguishment of debt  -   163,835   (163,835)
Gain on equity investment  6,370,787   -   6,370,787 
Other income  577,537   705,140   (127,603)
Amortization of deferred financing costs  (28,711)  (341,354)  (312,643)
Total other income/ (loss)  7,894,988   (3,568,588)  11,463,576 
             
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (18,197,552)  (12,355,774)  5,841,778 
(Benefit) provision for income taxes  (173,918)  107,205   281,123 
NET LOSS  (18,023,634)  (12,462,979)  5,560,655 
             
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS            
Foreign currency translation loss  (199,971)  (1,219,782)  1,019,811 
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(18,223,605) $(13,682,761) $4,540,844 

 

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152017

 

Revenue

 

RevenueWe generate revenues primarily from our mobile and security solutions and other platform and professional services. Our mobile and security solutions are hosted software solutions that generate hosting and subscription revenue. We also offer customer support and professional services related to implementing and supporting our suite of applications. We offer managed services and bundled services for our mobile solutions services. Managed service revenues are recognized monthly based on an average number of end users managed and is calculated based on a pre-determined service fee per user. For bundled services, we provide both network administration as well as mobile airtime management services. Bundled service revenue is recognized monthly based on an average number of end users of managed and mobile air-      time usage, calculated based on a pre-determined service fee. We also earn revenue from telecommunications services we offer, which revenue is based on a pre-determined rate and number of user minutes and calls that we manage in a given month. We also earn revenue from professional services, including consulting services to support business process mapping, configuration, data migration, integration and training.


The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by revenue source:

  Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2018    
  (as restated)  2017 
Monthly Service $19,170,276  $12,540,377 
Installation and Software Development  1,087,329   1,007,130 
Total revenues $20,257,605  $13,547,507 

The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by geography, based on the billing addresses of our customers.

  Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2018    
  (as restated)  2017 
Europe $18,752,751  $12,428,942 
Other geographic areas  1,504,854   1,118,565 
Total revenues $20,257,605  $13,547,507 

Our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $12,855,811, a decrease2018 were $20,257,605, an increase of $18,159,642$6,710,098, or 59%50%, compared to $31,015,453$13,547,507 for the year ended December 31, 2015.2017. This decreaseincrease was mainly due to the Company’s focus on growing the mobile managed services portion of the business which accounted for $13,677,179 of revenue for the full year of 2018, which was 68% of the total revenue for that year. Additionally, our newly acquired subsidiary, Artilium, contributed $5,171,680 of revenues in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues includes origination, termination, network and billing charges from telecommunications operators, costs of telecommunications service providers, network costs, data center costs, facility cost of hosting network and equipment and cost in providing resale arrangements with long distance service providers, cost of leasing transmission facilities, international gateway switches for voice, data transmission services, and the cost of professional services of staff directly related to the generation of revenues, consisting primarily of employee-related costs associated with these services, including share-based compensation and the cost of subcontractors. Cost of revenues excludes depreciation and amortization.

Cost of revenues for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2018 was $10,054,030, an increase of $6,370,421, or 173%, compared to $3,683,609 for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2017. The increase in 2018 was primarily due to higher costs related to volume growth and business acquisition of Artilium of $2,776,715 in 2018. Our gross margin may be affected based on the mix of volume in our customer base.

Product Development

Product development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses, including share-based expenses, of employees involved in the development of the Company’s services, which are expensed as incurred. Costs such as database architecture, and Pareteum BOSS & IN platform development and testing are included in this function.

Costs incurred during the application development stage of internal-use software projects, such as those used in the Company’s operations, are capitalized in accordance with the accounting guidance for costs of computer software developed for internal use. Capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis. When assigning useful lives to internal-use software, the Company considers the effects of obsolescence, competition, technology, and other economic factors. During the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company capitalized $1,282,054 and $661,605, respectively. The Artilium acquisition had no material effect on the 2018 capitalized software cost.

Product development expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $3,082,956 and $1,479,587, respectively, an increase of $1,603,369, or 108%, because of increased development on new products and newly acquired customers, as well as the acquisition of Artilium. We expect our product development expenses will continue to increase; however, the rate of increase is contingent upon on our mix of products and customers.


Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses, including share-based expenses, for our sales and marketing staff, including commissions, payments to partners and marketing programs. Marketing programs consist of advertising, events, corporate communications and brand building.

Sales and marketing expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $3,197,406 and $1,575,069, respectively, an increase of $1,622,337, or 103%. The increase was due to additions to the sales force as well as the inclusion of the Artilium sales and marketing expenses in 2018.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses are our largest cost and consist primarily of salaries and related expenses, including share-based compensation, for non-employee directors, finance and accounting, legal and human resources personnel, legal costs, professional fees and other corporate expenses.

General and administrative expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, were $17,329,163 and $10,097,027, respectively, an increase of $7,232,136, or 72%.  $7,711,885 of the increase resulted primarily from increased non-cash compensation, staff-related costs and the addition of Artilium. In 2019, the Company worked to decrease the compensatory costs from Artilium through identified synergies as a result of the acquisition.

Restructuring and Acquisition Costs

Restructuring charges for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $214,335 and $966,292, respectively, a decrease of $751,957 or 78%. The acquisition costs for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 were $7,045,226 related to our acquisition of Artilium. There were no acquisition costs in 2017. The restructuring plan from which the restructuring charges arose, which commenced in the fourth quarter of 2015, was designed to align actual expenses and investments with current revenues and continued after the acquisition of Artilium.

Share-based Compensation

Share-based compensation is comprised of:

·the expensing of the options granted under the 2017 Plan to staff and management;

·the expensing of the shares issued under the 2017 Plan to the directors and executive officers in lieu of cash compensation;

·the expensing of (restricted) shares issued for consultancy services; and

·the expensing of share awards granted under the 2008, 2017 and 2018 Plan to executive officers.

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we recognized share-based compensation expense of $6,782,759 and $4,289,033, respectively, an increase of $2,493,726 or 58%. This increase was driven by increased awards to the executive team as a result of the successful acquisition, as well as the inclusion of new executives from the Artilium business.

In the following table we show the allocation of share-based compensation according to functions in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss:

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2018  2017 
  (as restated)   
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization) $83,821  $70,025 
Product Development  150,396   74,148 
Sales and Marketing  471,522   207,735 
General and Administrative  6,077,020   3,937,125 
Total $6,782,759  $4,289,033 

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $5,427,029, an increase of $893,920, or 20%, compared to $4,533,109 for the same period in 2017. The increase is due to a full year of depreciation on the assets capitalized in 2017 and incremental depreciation on capitalized assets and intangible assets for 2018.


Interest Income and Expense

Interest income for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2018 was comparable to the prior year.

Interest expense for the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, was $308,742 and $1,654,418, respectively, a decrease of $1,345,676 or 81%, primarily as a result of the payoff in December 2017 of the senior secured debt.

Interest Expense Related to Debt Discount and Conversion Feature

For the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, interest expenses related to debt discount and conversion feature were $184,308 and $3,408,735, respectively, a decrease of $3,224,427, or 95%.

The decrease in the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2018, compared to 2017 was mainly caused by the accelerated amortization as a result of the repayment of the senior secured debt in 2017.

Changes in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities

Change in Fair Value of Conversion Feature and Warrant Liability

On December 18, 2015, the Company consummated an initial closing and on March 14, 2016, the Company consummated the last of twelve closings of a private placement offering of units (“Units”) to “accredited investors” (defined in Rule 501(a) of the Securities Act) as part of a “best efforts” private placement offering of up to $4,200,000 consisting of up to 140 Units, each Unit consisting of: (i) one 9% unsecured subordinated convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $30,000 (each a “Note” and collectively the “Notes”), which is convertible into shares (the “Note Shares”) of common stock of the Company at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $7.50 per share, subject to certain exceptions; and (ii) a five-year warrant (each a “Warrant” and collectively, the “Warrants”). The Notes contains elements that require liability accounting for the conversion feature. During the second quarter of 2017, the Company negotiated with the Note holders to eliminate any condition that required derivative accounting. This resulted in the calculation of the fair value as per the agreement date of the elimination of such feature and the subsequent accounting for the allocation of the remaining liability value towards extinguishment of debt and change in fair value of the conversion feature. Such renegotiations did not include the Saffelberg Note (as defined below).

During the third quarter of 2018, we renegotiated and settled the remaining outstanding amounts due under that certain promissory note held by Saffelberg Investments N.V. (the “Saffelberg Note”). The settlement resulted in the elimination of the derivative liability on the note and resulted in a combined revaluation gain of $1,283,914 for 2018, compared to a gain of $794,691 in 2017.

In the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company realized a gain on the extinguishment of debt of $163,835 as a result of the removal of the derivative liability that was associated with the senior secured debt. The amount was included in the consolidated statement of cash flows in the non-cash financing activities from amendments to fair market value adjustments to warrants liabilities and convertible feature liability.

The senior secured debt for which carried the derivative liability was completely paid in December of 2017. The company carried no senior secured debt and had no derivative liabilities for the full year ended December 31, 2018.

Gain on equity investment

Gain on equity investment represents the gain in our equity investment in Artilium at its carrying value of $3,230,208 at the time of our acquisition of Artilium compared to its acquisition-date fair value of $9,600,995.

Other Income and (expense), net

Other income and (expense) net, is income generated from non-operating activities. For the year ended December 31, 2018, it was $577,537 compared to $705,140 for the year ended December 31, 2017, a decline of 18%, which was caused by the realized exchange rate gains.


Amortization of Deferred Finance Costs

For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2018, there was an amount of $28,711 as amortization of deferred finance costs, compared to a $341,354 for period ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $312,643. The $341,354 of amortization cost in 2017 was the result of the accelerated recognitionamortization after voluntary conversion of certain previously issued 9% Unsecured Convertible notes.

Provision for Income Taxes

Income tax benefit for the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2018 was $173,918, compared to a provision for income taxes of $107,205 for the same period in 2017. This change was due to the deferred revenue caused by the termination of a contract with customer Iusacell in June 2015 of $11,571,458, decreasestax liability included in the Company’sArtilium acquisition.

Net Loss

As a result of the foregoing, net loss for the twelve months’ period ended December 31, 2018, was $18,023,634, an increase in loss of $5,560,655 or 45%, compared to the loss of $12,462,979 for the same period in 2017.

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

We record foreign currency translation gains and losses as part of other mobilecomprehensive income (loss), which amounted to a loss for the twelve-months ended December 31, 2018 of $199,971, compared to a loss of $1,219,782 for the year ended December 31, 2017, an improvement of $1,019,811. The 2017 effect was is primarily attributable to the translation effect resulting on fixed assets held by our subsidiaries.

Consolidated Quarterly Results Our quarterly financial results, as restated, and security business revenue of $6,822,886 offset by a positive EUR vs. USD currencythe impact of $195,272.the restatement adjustments are summarized in the following tables. Additional information regarding the restatement adjustments are discussed in Note 27, “Unaudited Quarterly Data (Restated)” in Item 8 of this amended Annual Report.


Selected Quarterly Financial Data                        
  For the quarters ended,             
  (as restated)  Adjustments/Increase(decrease) (a) 
  Mar. 31, 2018  June 30, 2018  Sept. 30, 2018  Dec. 31, 2018  Mar. 31, 2018  June 30, 2018  Sept. 30, 2018  Dec. 31, 2018 
  Q1  Q2  Q3  Q4  Q1  Q2  Q3  Q4 
REVENUES $3,650,113  $3,878,446  $3,999,958  $8,729,088  $(462,457) $(2,124,734) $(4,007,776) $(5,583,164)
                                 
COST AND OPERATING EXPENSES                                
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization)  1,199,509   1,836,421   2,279,283   4,738,817   4,986   56,539   150,600   (487,741)
Product development  727,767   804,013   704,901   846,277   922   50,082   (60,822)  - 
Sales and marketing  704,154   809,235   691,852   992,165   15,156   156,793   (150,891)  15,114 
General and administrative expenses  1,829,547   2,253,330   6,710,930   6,535,356   (467,305)  39,260   (1,417,052)  1,365,348 
Restructuring and acquistion costs  73,600   5,592   1,995,240   5,185,128   -   -   728   - 
Depreciation and amortization  965,290   994,318   998,856   2,468,564   -   -   -   - 
Total cost and operating expenses  5,499,867   6,702,909   13,381,062   20,766,307   (446,241)  302,674   (1,477,437)  892,721 
                                 
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (1,849,754)  (2,824,463)  (9,381,104)  (12,037,219)  (16,216)  (2,427,408)  (2,530,339)  (6,475,885)
                                 
OTHER INCOME/ (LOSS)  (300,981)  2,072,361   (150,058)  6,273,667   -   -   -   6,370,788 
                                 
INCOME/(LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (2,150,735)  (752,102)  (9,531,162)  (5,763,552)  (16,216)  (2,427,408)  (2,530,339)  (105,097)
Provision/(benefit) for income taxes  (418)  18,844   19,585   (211,929)  -   2   2   (30,082)
NET (LOSS)/INCOME  (2,150,317)  (770,946)  (9,550,747)  (5,551,623)  (16,216)  (2,427,410)  (2,530,341)  (75,015)
                                 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)                                
Foreign currency translation (loss)/income  192,686   (362,630)  (37,693)  7,666   88,284   (283,493)  (16,113)  5,440 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS) $(1,957,631) $(1,133,576) $(9,588,440) $(5,543,957) $72,068  $(2,710,903) $(2,546,454) $(69,575)

(a) For further details regarding the restatement adjustments, see Note 1, Restatement to the Notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this amended Anuual Report in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"


Selected Quarterly Financial Data   
             
  For the Quarters Ended ,          
  Mar. 31, 2018  Jun. 30, 2018  Sept. 30, 2018  Dec. 31, 2018  Six Months Ended  Nine Months Ended  Twelve Months
Ended
 
  Q1  Q2  Q3  Q4  Jun. 30, 2018  Sept. 30, 2018  Dec. 31, 2018 
  (as restated)  (as restated) 
REVENUES $3,650,113  $3,878,446  $3,999,958  $8,729,088  $7,528,559  $11,528,517  $20,257,605 
                             
COST AND OPERATING EXPENSES                            
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization)  1,199,509   1,836,421   2,279,283   4,738,817   3,035,930   5,315,213   10,054,030 
Product development  727,767   804,013   704,901   846,277   1,531,778   2,236,679   3,082,956 
Sales& Marketing  704,154   809,235   691,852   992,165   1,513,389   2,205,241   3,197,406 
General& administrative  1,829,547   2,253,330   6,710,930   6,535,356   4,082,877   10,793,807   17,329,163 
Restructuring and acquisition costs  73,600   5,592   1,995,240   5,185,128   79,193   2,074,433   7,259,561 
Depreciation and amortization  965,290   994,318   998,856   2,468,564   1,959,609   2,958,465   5,427,029 
Total cost and operating expenses  5,499,867   6,702,909   13,381,062   20,766,307   12,202,776   25,583,838   46,350,145 
                             
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (1,849,754)  (2,824,463)  (9,381,104)  (12,037,219)  (4,674,217)  (14,055,321)  (26,092,540)
                             
OTHER INCOME/ (LOSS)  (300,981)  2,072,361   (150,058)  6,273,667   1,771,379   1,621,321   7,894,988 
                             
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (2,150,735)  (752,102)  (9,531,162)  (5,763,552)  (2,902,838)  (12,434,000)  (18,197,552)
Provision/(benefit) for income taxes  (418)  18,844   19,585   (211,929)  18,426   38,011   (173,918)
NET LOSS  (2,150,317)  (770,946)  (9,550,747)  (5,551,623)  (2,921,264)  (12,472,011)  (18,023,634)
                             
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)                            
Foreign currency translation (loss)/income  192,686   (362,630)  (37,693)  7,666   (169,944)  (207,637)  (199,971)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(1,957,631) $(1,133,576) $(9,588,440) $(5,543,957) $(3,091,208) $(12,679,648) $(18,223,605)


Selected Quarterly Financial Data   
  For the Quarters Ended,          
  Mar. 31, 2017  June 30, 2017  Sept. 30, 2017  Dec. 31, 2017  Six Months Ended  Nine Months Ended  Twelve Months Ended 
  Q1  Q2  Q3  Q4  June 30, 2017  Sept. 30, 2017  Dec. 31, 2017 
REVENUES $2,794,943  $3,239,175  $3,498,688  $4,014,701  $6,034,118  $9,532,806  $13,547,507 
                             
COST AND OPERATING EXPENSES                            
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization)  841,903   945,687   791,334   1,104,685   1,787,590   2,578,924   3,683,609 
Product development  284,694   273,512   497,078   424,303   558,206   1,055,284   1,479,587 
Sales& Marketing  319,487   370,795   412,881   471,906   690,282   1,103,163   1,575,069 
General& administrative  2,365,388   1,490,838   1,578,960   4,661,841   3,856,226   5,435,186   10,097,027 
Restructuring and acquisition costs  129,229   458,877   253,014   125,172   588,106   841,120   966,292 
Depreciation and amortization  843,783   872,693   1,432,712   1,383,921   1,716,476   3,149,188   4,533,109 
Total cost and operating expenses  4,784,484   4,412,402   4,965,979   8,171,828   9,196,886   14,162,865   22,334,693 
                             
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (1,989,541)  (1,173,227)  (1,467,291)  (4,157,127)  (3,162,768)  (4,630,059)  (8,787,186)
                             
OTHER INCOME/ (LOSS)  697,688   (237,355)  (694,374)  (3,334,547)  460,333   (234,041)  (3,568,588)
                             
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (1,291,853)  (1,410,582)  (2,161,665)  (7,491,674)  (2,702,435)  (4,864,100)  (12,355,774)
Provision/(benefit) for income taxes  1,287   (67,782)  147,640   26,060   (66,495)  81,145   107,205 
NET LOSS  (1,293,140)  (1,342,800)  (2,309,305)  (7,517,734)  (2,635,940)  (4,945,245)  (12,462,979)
                             
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)                            
Foreign currency translation (loss)/income  (26,820)  16,169   2,139   (1,211,270)  (10,651)  (8,512)  (1,219,782)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(1,319,960) $(1,326,631) $(2,307,166) $(8,729,004) $(2,646,591) $(4,953,757) $(13,682,761)

Quarterly Results of Operations Discussion:

 

In 2016, total billings were $11,772,475 of which $11,517,711 was recognized as revenue with the remainder of $254,764 deferred over the remaining contract period in accordance with ASC 605-25. In addition, $1,338,100 was released from the balance sheet line item Net billings in excess of revenues to revenue Total revenue for 2016 was therefore 12,855,811.Revenues

 

In 2015,Comparison of three months ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017.

Revenues for the total billingsthree months ended March 31, 2018 were $21,262,228$3,650,113; a $855,170, or 31%, increase compared to $2,794,943 for the comparable three months in 2017. Our deployments with existing customers continued to grow, new implementations generated new revenues and $19,443,995new cloud-based revenues were all factors in our revenue growth.

Comparison of three months and six months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017.

Revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 were $3,878,446 and $7,528,559; a $639,271 and $1,494,441, respectively, or 20% and 25%, respectively, increase compared to $3,239,175 and $6,034,118, respectively, for the comparable three and six months in 2017. The increase was recognizeddriven by volume growth in revenue with the remainder deferred overexisting customer base and new customer implementations.

Comparison of three months and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017.

Revenues for the remaining contract periodthree and nine months ended September 30, 2018 were $3,999,958 and $11,528,517, respectively; a $501,271 and $1,995,711, respectively, or 14% and 21%, respectively, increase compared to $3,498,688 and $9,532,806, respectively, for the comparable three and nine months in accordance with ASC 605-25.2017. The increase was driven by continued volume growth in existing customer base as well as new customer implementations.

 

Cost of ServiceRevenues

 

Cost of servicerevenues includes origination, termination, network and billing charges from telecommunications operators, costs of telecommunications service providers, network costs, data center costs, facility cost of hosting network and equipment and cost in providing resale arrangements with long distance service providers, cost of leasing transmission facilities, international gateway switches for voice, data transmission services, and the cost of professional services of staff directly related to the generation of revenues, consisting primarily of employee-related costs associated with these services, including share-based compensation and the cost of subcontractors. Cost of service excludes depreciation and amortization.

 

Comparison of three months ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017.

Cost of servicerevenues for the twelve-month periodthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20162018 was $3,658,667, a decrease$1,199,509, an increase of $ $2,267,624$357,606, or 38%42%, compared to $5,926,291$841,903 for the twelve-monththree-month period in 2017. Cost of revenues increases were driven by higher volume related to revenue growth.


Comparison of three months and six months ended December 31, 2015. The negative impact of the EUR versus USD exchange rate in 2016 was $102,963.June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017.

 

The decreaseCost of revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 was $1,836,421 and $3,035,930, respectively, an increase of $890,734 and $1,248,340, respectively, or 94% and 70%, respectively, compared to $945,687 and $1,787,590, respectively, for the comparable three and six month periods in costs2017. Cost of $2,267,624 wasrevenues increases were driven by volume in revenue growth as well as material, network infrastructure and support expenses.

Comparison of three months and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017.

Cost of revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 were $2,279,283 and $5,315,213, respectively, an increase of $1,487,949 and $2,736,289, respectively, or 188% and 106%, respectively, compared to $791,334 and $2,578,924, respectively, for the comparable three and nine month periods in 2017. Cost of revenues increases were driven by higher data volume related to a decrease in cost of mobile bundled service businessrevenue growth and network of $1,236,915, decrease in cost of service related management & personnel expenses of $986,771 and a $43,938 reduction of non-cash related expenses.activation costs.

25

 

Product Development

 

Product Developmentdevelopment costs consist primarily of salaries and related expenses, including share-based expenses, of employees involved in the development of the Company’s services, which are expensed as incurred. Costs such as database architecture, and Pareteum BOSS &IN& IN platform development and testing are included in this function.

 

Costs incurred during the application development stageComparison of internal-use software projects, such as those used in the Company’s operations, are capitalized in accordance with the accounting guidance for costs of computer software developed for internal use. Capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis. When assigning useful lives to internal-use software, the Company considers the effects of obsolescence, competition, technology,three months ended March 31, 2018 and other economic factors. During the twelve-month period ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company capitalized $990,076 and $4,142,089, respectively. As a result of the ongoing restructuring measures, that also impacted the development department, the Company decided to suspend project capitalization during the third and fourth quarter of 2016.2017.

 

Product development expensescosts for the twelvethree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20162018 and 20152017 were $3,543,590$727,767 and $4,543,492, a decrease$284,694, respectively, an increase of $999,902$443,073 or 22%156%. The increase was due to the overall expansion of our lines of business year over year.

 

Comparison of three months and six months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017.

Product development costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 were $804,013 and $1,531,778, respectively, an increase of $530,501 and $973,572, respectively, or 194% and 174%, respectively, compared to $273,512 and $558,206, respectively, for the comparable three and six month periods in 2017. The net effect of the cost reductions in headcount of $4,101,426 along with the reduction in Non-cash compensation expense of $464,641increase was offsetcaused principally by the requirementoverall expansion of our lines of business and product offering year over year.

Comparison of three months and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017.

Product development costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 were $704,901 and $2,236,679, respectively, an increase of $207,823 and $1,181,395, respectively, or 42% and 112%, respectively, compared to expense costs that had previously been capitalized but whose projects were suspended or eliminated. That charge$497,078 and $1,055,284, respectively, for the comparable three and nine month periods in 2017. The increase was $3,566,165. A lower EUR vs. USD exchange rate in 2016 negatively impacteddue to a continued brand awareness campaign through various media outlets and the result by $49,132.overall expansion of our lines of business year over year.

 

Sales and Marketing

 

Sales and Marketingmarketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses, including share-based expenses, for our sales and marketing staff, including commissions, payments to partners and marketing programs. Marketing programs consist of advertising, events, corporate communications and brand building.

 

Comparison of three months ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017.

Sales and Marketingmarketing expenses for the twelvethree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20162018 and 20152017 were $1,340,959$704,154 and $2,633,958,$319,487, respectively, an increase of $384,667, or 120%. This increase was a decreasedirect result of $1,292,999hiring new employees and allocating resources to growing our business.

Comparison of three months and six months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017.

Sales and marketing expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 were $809,235 and $1,513,389, respectively, an increase of $438,440 and $823,107, respectively, or 49%. Included is118% and 119%, respectively, compared to $370,795 and $690,282, respectively, for the negative impactcomparable three and six month periods in 2017. This increase was due to higher expenses related to our brand awareness campaign in marketing, tradeshows and conferences, in addition, to hiring and allocating resources to growing our business.


Comparison of three months and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017.

Sales and marketing expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 were $691,852 and $2,205,241, respectively, an increase of $278,971 and $1,102,079, respectively, or 68% and 100%, respectively, compared to $412,881 and $1,103,163, respectively for the comparable three and nine month periods in 2017. This increase was due to higher EUR versus USD exchange rateexpenses related to our continued brand awareness campaign in 2015 of $74,210. The decrease included $568,983 attributablemarketing, tradeshows and conferences, in addition, to decreased staffing, $483,880 attributablehiring and allocating resources to non-cash related compensation expenses and $240,136 resulting from reduced third party PR and general marketing related expenses.growing our business.

 

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses are our largest cost and consist primarily of overhead related salaries and related expenses, including share-based compensation, for non-employee directors, finance and accounting, legal, internal audit and human resources personnel, legal costs, professional fees and other corporate expenses.

 

Comparison of three months ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017.

General and Administrativeadministrative expenses for the twelvethree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20162018 and 20152017 were $11,708,151$1,829,547 and $11,649,914,$2,365,388, respectively, an increasea decrease of $58,237 being less than 1%$535,841, or 23%. The negative impactreduction was related to share-based compensation and other staff related expenses.

Comparison of the EUR versus USD exchange rate in 2016 was $405,230.three months and six months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017.

 

General and administrative expenses increased by $58,237 as a result of increased stock based compensation of $1,328,180, General and Administrative related Management & Personnel expenses decreased by $130,071. Office rent, office supplies, travel and car expenses, local entity expenses, automation and communication, audit and accountancy, quality assurance, listing costs and other expenses decreased in total by $1,409,001. Corporate & local legal advice, investor relations and regulatory expenses increased in total by $525,883. Prior year adjustments, bad debt allowance, exchange rate expenses and other profit and losses decreased in total by $256,754.

Restructuring charges

Restructuring chargesforfor the twelvethree months ended December 31, 2016June 30, 2018 and 20152017 were $1,638,049$2,253,330 and $1,254,598, an increase of $383,451 or 31%.The substantial three phase restructuring plan (the “Plan”) was completed in the third quarter 2016. The Plan which commenced in the fourth quarter of 2015 was designed to align actual expenses and investments with current revenues as well as introduce new executive management.

26

Share-based compensation

Share-based compensation is comprised of:

·the expensing of the options granted under the 2008 Plan to staff and management;
·the expensing of the shares issued under the 2006 and 2008 Plans to the directors and executive officers in lieu of cash compensation;
·the expensing of restricted shares issued for consultancy services.

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we recognized share-based compensation expense of $3,897,437 and $3,481,908,$1,490,838, respectively, an increase of $415,529$762,492 or 12%51%. In 2016This increase was primarily the Company granted various non-cash awardsresults of increased travel, legal, accounting, and incentives in order to make sure that key players and staff kept focused and motivated to make the reorganization a success, this resulted in a substantial higher share-based compensation for the full year 2016. Contrary compared to 2016, in 2015 certain executives and managers of the Company elected to participate in a stock in lieu of cash program in order to preserve cash for the Company, which was the main reason for the increased share based expensing in previous year.marketing costs.

 

In the following table we show the allocation of share-based compensation according to functions in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss:

  2016  2015 
Cost of service $76,113  $120,051 
Product Development  183,072   647,713 
Sales and Marketing  157,428   641,308 
General and Administrative  3,480,824   2,072,836 
Total $3,897,437  $3,481,908 

DepreciationGeneral and Amortization

Depreciation and amortizationadministrative expenses for the yearsix months ended December 31, 2016June 30, 2018 and 2017 were $4,082,877 and $3,856,226, respectively, an increase of $226,651 or 6%.  This increase was $4,246,787, a decrease of $2,377,198 or 36%, compared to $6,623,985 for the same period in 2015. Depreciation and amortization expenses adjusted for exchange rate effect decreased by $2,229,863. This decrease is primarily the result of the impairment for assets heldincreased share-based compensation and used and the termination of the depreciation and amortization of the Assets Held for Sale.travel.

Impairment for assets heldComparison of three months and usednine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017.

 

In the Company’s review of the carrying amounts of its assets it was determined that following the impact of the recent restructuring on the current project list, $367,268 of certain assets classified under Construction in ProgressGeneral and Intangible assets needed to be impaired. As the result of the termination of the Verizon contract the Telnicity LLC intangible assets that were acquired in January 2013 are impaired for a total amount of $139,069. In September 2016, we ceased our Bandung, Indonesia operations. The closing of the local entity resulted in an impairment loss of $344,648. The total impairment charge, recorded in 2016, is $850,985.

Impairment of goodwill

After the divestment of ValidSoft and renewed strategy the Company decided to impair the carrying value of goodwill related to ValidSoft. Following the restructuring and rationalization that commenced in the fourth quarter 2015 the Morodo and Telnicity related projects were cancelled and the related headcount phased out. As a result the Company decided to fully impair the carrying value of goodwill related to Morodo and Telnicity. Total impact of the impairment of goodwill was $3,228,930.

Loss on sale of assets

The sale of ValidSoft at the end of the third quarteradministrative expenses for the price of $3.0 million was completedthree and the Company received $2.0 million in cashnine months ended September 30, 2018 were $6,710,930 and a $1.0 million promissory note. The $2.0 million in cash was used to pay down part of the senior secured loan. The divestment of ValidSoft resulted in a net loss of $ 1,542,374. In connection with the sale, the Company wrote off $4,577,908 of assets held for sale as of June 30, 2016.

27

Interest Income and Expense

Interest income for the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $112,169 and $106,028, respectively. Interest income consists of interest received on bank balances and interest charged to customers for extended payment terms.

Interest expense for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, was $1,228,201 and $1,488,203, respectively, a decrease of $260,002 or 17%. The lower levels of interest expense were the result of repaying the high interest bearing credit facility and substituting the need for liquidity with the lower interest bearing 9% convertible notes.

Interest Expense Related to Debt Discount and Conversion Feature

For the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, interest expenses related to debt discount and conversion feature were $6,041,607 and $682,389,$10,793,807, respectively, an increase of $5,359,218$5,131,970 and $5,358,621, respectively, or 785%.

The increase in the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2016325% and 99%, respectively, compared to 2015 was mainly due to the amendment of the third party credit agreement with higher repayment conditions$1,578,960 and additional warrants resulting in substantially higher charges compared to 2015.

Changes in Fair Value of Derivative liabilities

Change in Fair Value of Conversion Feature

In December 2015 and in the first quarter of 2016, we consummated twelve closings of our private placement offering, the 9% Unsecured Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note (“the Promissory Note”). The Promissory Note contains elements which require liability accounting$5,435,186, respectively, for the conversion feature. We have calculated the fair market value for the conversion feature at issuancecomparable three and performed a mark to market at each quarter-end which resultednine month periods in a cumulative change in fair value during the twelve month period of 2016, the variance of which amounted to a loss of $1,485,359 compared to the loss in 2015 of $44,804 were both accounted for through the profit and loss account during the respective years.

Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liabilities

The mark to market adjustment for the warrant liabilities can be broken down into the following origins.

The warrants issued as part of the offering of the 9% Unsecured Convertible Note resulting in a positive variance of $776,771 (gain) compared to a negative variance of $51,153 (loss) in 2015.

Warrants issued to the lender of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and between the Company and Atalaya Administrative LLC, as the administrative agent and collateral agent (“Atalaya”), and the lenders party thereto resulting in a negative variance of $2,702,178 (loss) compared to $0 in 2015 as no position existed yet.

Warrants issued in relation to the “Saffelberg Note” for investing in a 9% Unsecured Convertible Notes resulting in a negative variance of $8,687 (loss) compared to $0 in 2015 as no position existed yet.

Fair value movements of warrants issued to fundraise agents resulted in a positive variance of $103,253.

The value of the more complex warrants2017. This increase was determined by a third-party valuation expert using a Monte-Carlo Simulation model.

Gain/(Loss) on extinguishment of debt

The loss of $541,899 in 2016 is caused by the $867,338 (loss) as a result of the extinguishment of debt entries relating to the amendment of the credit agreement with Atalaya, $343,519 (gain) isprimarily the result of the conversion of the 9% notes held by various noteholdersincreased share-based compensation, travel, legal, accounting and $18,080 (loss) as a result of the repayment in shares of the CRI loan which was paid as an advance for the acquisition of ValidSoft which was finally not effectuated.

28

The gain of $2,475,799 in 2015 is the result of the extinguishment of debt related to the Chong Hing Bank debt of our subsidiary Pareteum Ltd in Hong Kong following the expiration of the statute of limitations in Hong Kong, as well as the verdict by California courts in 2011 that the Company was not liable as a successor in interest or otherwise, on the bank loans and overdraft account to Pareteum Ltd. The amounts released from the balance sheet were $433,480 (overdraft), $962,522 (loan payable) and $1,079,797 (accrued interest).

Other Income and (Expense)

Other income & (expense) for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2016 was a loss of $220,927 compared to a loss of $922,894 for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2015. As to 2016, the majority is caused by the unrealized exchange rate losses related to the exchange rate variances caused by the Atalaya Credit Agreement which is accounted for in the primary functional currency (EURO) of the company.

Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs

Amortization of debt issuance cost were $1,267,073 for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2016, an increase of $753,516 or 147%, compared to $513,557 for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2015.

Provision (Benefit) Income taxes

Income tax provision for the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2016 was an income tax provision of $38,286, compared to an income tax benefit of $17,225 for the same period in 2015.

Net Loss

Net loss for the twelve months’ period ended December 31, 2016, was $31,444,704, an increase in loss of $26,438,469 or 528%, compared to the loss of $5,006,235 for the same period in 2015. This increase was mainly caused by the full release in 2015 of deferred revenue of $11,571,458 related to the termination of the contract with Iusacell as well as the net loss on sale of assets ($1,542,374), impairment of goodwill ($3,228,930), impairment for assets held and used of ($850,985), changes in derivative liabilities ($3,316,199) as well as the interest expense related to debt discount and conversion feature ($6,041,607).

Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

We record foreign currency translation gains and losses as part of other comprehensive (loss) income, which amounted to a gain as of December 31, 2016 of $703,073, compared to a loss of $2,662,843 for the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of $3,365,916 or 126%. This change is primarily attributable to the translation effect resulting from the substantial fluctuations in the USD/Euro exchange rates in the reporting period, since our balance sheets position are largely denominated in Euro and are translated on balance sheet date.marketing costs.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company reported net (loss)losses of $(31,444,704)$18,023,634 and $(5,006,235)$12,462,979 for the years ended 2016December 31, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively, and had an accumulated deficit of $(287,080,234)$317,131,686 as of December 31, 20162018 and ($255,635,531)$299,543,213 as of December 31, 2015.2017.

 

The cash balance, including restricted cash and cash, of the Company at December 31, 20162018 was $ 931,189. Additional capital is required$6,482,364. The incremental equity raised during the fourth quarter 2016 to cover working capital deficiencies. The incremental loan during the third quarter provided vital liquidity in the short termterm. As of September 30, 2020, our cash balance, including restricted cash ($7.7 million), was approximately $11.1 million.

On June 8, 2020, we issued a $17.5 million 8% Senior Secured Convertible Note (the “High Trail Note”) to High Trail Investments SA LLC (“High Trail”) due April 1, 2025 for an aggregate purchase price of $14 million, of which $7 million is currently maintained in one or more blocked accounts. The terms of the High Trail Note and related documents require the Company is pursuing additional capital.to meet certain specified conditions and covenants, some of which have not been satisfied by the dates required, including (i) the Company filing its restated financial statements with the SEC for (a) the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (b) the quarter ended March 31, 2019 and (c) the quarter ended June 30, 2019, in each case on or prior to October 31, 2020, (ii) after October 31, 2020, the Company timely filing its subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or its subsequent annual reports on Form 10-K with the SEC in the manner and within the time periods required under the Exchange Act and (iii) the Company maintaining the listing of its common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market. As a result, on December 1, 2020, we entered into a forbearance agreement (the “Forbearance Agreement”) with High Trail under which: (i) we admitted that we were in default of several obligations under the High Trail Note and related agreements, (ii) High Trail acknowledged such defaults and agreed not to exercise any right or remedy under the High Trail Note or the related securities purchase agreement, warrant or security documents, including its right to accelerate the aggregate amount outstanding under the High Trail Note, until the earlier of December 31, 2020, the date of any new event of default or initiation of any action by the Company to invalidate any of the representations and warranties made in the Forbearance Agreement. As a result of the defaults, the interest rate paid on the principal outstanding under the High Trail Note increased to 18% per annum. As partial consideration for its agreement to not to exercise any right or remedy under the High Trail financing documents, we agreed with High Trail to make certain changes to the High Trail Note and related agreements. In this regard, we agreed to delete the “Floor Price” of $0.10 that had previously limited the number of shares of Company common stock into which (i) the outstanding indebtedness could be converted upon default and (ii) payments of interest could be made. We also agreed to increase the number of shares it was required to reserve for issuance upon conversion of the High Trail Note and to decrease the exercise price of the related warrant from $0.58 to $0.37.


Because of the limited nature of the relief provided under the Forbearance Agreement, which does not lower the amounts payable in principal or interest, we believe that we will not have sufficient resources to fund our operations and meet the obligations specified in the note for the next twelve months following the filing of this amended Annual Report. Our software platforms require ongoing funding to continue the current development and operational plans and we have a history of net losses. We will continue to expend substantial resources for the foreseeable future in connection with the continued development of our software platforms. These expenditures will include costs associated with research and development activity, corporate administration, business development, and marketing and selling of our services. In addition, other unanticipated costs may arise.

 

AlthoughAs a result, we believe that additional capital will be required to fund our operations and provide growth capital to meet the Company has previously been ableobligations under the High Trail Note. Accordingly, we will have to raise additional capital as needed,in one or more debt and/or equity offerings. However, there can be no assurance that additionalwe will be successful in raising the necessary capital or that any such offering will be available at all, or if available, on reasonable terms. Further, the terms of such financing may be dilutive to our existing stockholders or otherwiseus on terms not favorableacceptable to us, or our existing stockholders.at all. If we are unable to secureraise additional capital or unsuccessful in meeting our cash flow objectives orthat may be needed, this would have a material adverse effect on the Lender takes steps to callCompany. Furthermore, the loan before new capital is attracted,recent outbreak of the Company will be materially andCOVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted world financial markets, has negatively impacted U.S. market conditions and may reduce opportunities for us to seek out additional funding. In particular, a decline in the market price of our common stock, coupled with the stock’s delisting from the Nasdaq Capital Market, could make it more difficult to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we may havedeem appropriate. The factors discussed above raise substantial doubt as to initiate cost reduction measures.

29

our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued.

 

Operating activitiesActivities

 

TheWe reported net cash used in operating activities of $3,657,831$7,820,065 for the year ended December 31, 20162018, compared to net cash provided byused in operating activities of $8,979,835$2,616,160 in 2015 decreased by $12,637,666. This2017, an increase in 2015 was largely thecash used of $5,203,905. Operating activities decreased primarily as a result of the termination settlement agreement with our customer Iusacell (decreasing accounts receivable) and our control of expenses and deferred payments to suppliers and vendors (increasing accounts payable and accrued expenses). Thea decrease in 2016 was largely the resultadd back of several items such as the dispositionamortization of Validsoftdeferred financing costs, stock-based compensation, depreciation and continuing operating losses.amortization and change in fair value of warrant liability.

 

 2016  2015  2018 2017 
          
Net loss $(31,444,704) $(5,006,235) $(18,023,634) $(12,462,979)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:  25,065,690   12,400,001   5,511,242   12,564,439 
  (6,379,014)  7,393,766   (12,512,392)  101,460 
                
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:  2,721,183   1,586,069   4,692,327   (2,717,620)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities $(3,657,831) $8,979,835 
Net cash used in operating activities $(7,820,065) $(2,616,160)

 

Investing activitiesActivities

 

Net cash provided byused in investing activities for year ended December 31, 20162018, was $1,036,840$11,524,682 an increase of $8,746,812$10,802,859 or 113%1,497%, compared to $7,709,972$721,823 net cash used in investing activities in 2015.2017. This changeincrease is thea result of the decreaseacquisition of Artilium in the capitalization of product development costs totaling $3,152,013, decrease of lease installments $1,577,381year ended December 31, 2018 and less third party capital expenditures of $1,567,418. The proceeds of the sale of ValidSoft, includedcapitalized software which amounted to $3,403,071, which includes $2,000,000 in the net cash provided by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, was $2,000,000.During the first quarter of 2016 we received $450,000 of proceeds from the 9% Unsecured Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note and the of advance purchase payment on “Assets held for Sale.”software licenses.

 

Financing activitiesActivities

 

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 20162018, was $3,126,020,$12,107,513, compared to net cash used inprovided by financing activities of $3,106,697$15,859,090 for the year ended December 31, 2015. See Notes 14 and 162017. Financing activities decreased as a result of the Financial Statements for more information.Company’s equity raises offset by paying down all of the senior secured debt in 2017.

 


As a result of the above activities, we had a cash, and cash equivalents balanceand restricted cash of $931,189$6,482,364 as of December 31, 20162018, compared to $369,250$13,737,675 as of December 31, 2015,2017, a net increasedecrease in cash, and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $561,939.$7,255,311.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have either a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors, nor we have any relationships with unconsolidated organizations or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities that would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

 

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Revenue Recognition and Net billings in excess of revenues

 

Revenue represents amounts earned for (non-software) arrangements consisting of hosting subscriptions for mobile and security solutions. We also offer customer support and professional services related to implementing and supporting our suite of applications. Revenues generally are recognized net of any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.

 

30

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (Topic 606) "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." Topic 606 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605 “Revenue Recognition” (Topic 605), and requires entities to recognize revenue when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. We adopted Topic 606 as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method.

 

Hosting subscriptions provide customers accessAdoption of ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers

On January 1, 2018, we adopted Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606.

We recorded a net decrease to opening accumulated deficit of $107,520 as of January 1, 2018 due to the cumulative impact of adopting Topic 606, with the impact primarily related to our software oninstallation revenues that were previously deferred for which the performance obligation was determined to be complete as of the date of adoption.

Monthly Service Revenues

The Company’s performance obligations in monthly Software as a subscription basis,Service (SaaS) and support services (e.g. Network operating costsservice offerings are simultaneously received and second line helpdesk) related to those arrangements. Hosting subscriptionsconsumed by the customer and therefore, are recognized ratably over time. For recognition purposes, we do not unbundle such services into separate performance obligations. The Company typically bills its customer at the contract term commencingend of each month, with payment to be received shortly thereafter. The fees charged may include a combination of fixed and variable charges with the date ourvariable charges tied to the number of subscribers or some other measure of volume. Although the consideration may be variable, the volumes are estimable at the time of billing, with “true-up” adjustments occurring in the subsequent month. Such amounts have not been historically significant.

Installation and Software Development Revenues

The Company’s other revenues consist generally of installation and development projects.

Installation represents the activities necessary for a customer to obtain access and connectivity to the Company’s monthly SaaS and service is made available to customers and when allofferings. While installation may require separate phases, it represents one promise within the context of the following conditionscontract.

Development consists of programming and other services which adds new functionality to a customer’s existing or new service offerings. Each development project defines its milestones and will have been met: (i) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; (ii) delivery has occurred; (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability of the fee is reasonably assured.  its own performance obligation.


Revenue is recorded asrecognized over time if the installation and development activities create an asset that has no alternative use for which the Company is entitled to receive payment for performance completed to date. If not, then revenue is not recognized until the applicable performance obligation is satisfied.

Arrangements with Multiple Performance Obligations

The Company’s contracts with customers may include multiple performance obligations. For such arrangements, the Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. The Company generally determines standalone selling prices based on the prices charged to customers.

Net Billings in Excess of Revenues

The Company records net billings in excess of revenues when payments are made in advance of our performance, including amounts which are refundable. Net billings in excess of revenues was $227,304 as of December 31, 2018, a decrease of $15,682 as compared to $242,986 as of December 31, 2017.

Payment terms vary by the type and location of our customer and the products or services offered. The term between invoicing and when payment is due is not significant. For certain products or services and customer types, payment is required before allthe products or services are delivered to the customer.

Contract Assets

Given the nature of the relevant criteria for revenue recognition are satisfied.Company’s services and contracts, it has no contract assets.

Revenue Recognition under Topic 605

 

Beginning in 2013, when our business was transitions formtransitioned from the landline business to the mobile and security solutions business, the Company entered into multiple element arrangements which are accounted in accordance with ASC 605-25 “Revenue605 Revenue Recognition-Multiple Element Arrangements”Arrangements (“ASC 605”) for revenue recorded prior to the adoption of ASC Topic 606 Revenue for Customers with Contracts.

 

The elements in a multiple element arrangement are identified and are separated into separate units of accounting when both of the following criteria are met: The delivered item or items have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, meaning the delivered item or items have value on a standalone basis if it sold separately by any vendor or the customer could resell the delivered item or items on a stand-alone basis. And if the arrangement includes a general right of return related to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered item or items are considered probably and substantially in the control of the Company. Total consideration of a multiple-element arrangement is then allocated using the relative selling price method using the hierarchy prescribed in ASC 605-25.605. In accordance with that hierarchy if fair value of the vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) or, third-party evidence (TPE) does not exist for the element, then the best estimated selling price (BESP) is used.

 

Since the Company has neither VSOE nor TPE, the Company determines BESP for all deliverables in their hosting arrangements. In determining the BESP, the Company considers multiple factors which include, and are not limited to, the following: (i) gross margin objectives and internal costs for services; (ii) pricing practices, market conditions; (iii) competitive landscape; and (iv) growth strategy.

 

Accordingly, management’s judgment is applied regarding, among other aspects, conformance with acceptance criteria and if delivery of services has occurred and the degree of completion.

 

In the paragraphs below, we explain the revenue recognition policy for each element.

 

For the mobile solutions services the Company recognizes revenues from customers accessing our cloud-based application suite in two different service offerings, namely managed services and bundled services.

 

For managed services, revenues are recognized for network administration services provided to end users on behalf of Mobile Network Operators (MNO) and virtual Mobile Network Operators (MVNO’s). Managed service revenues are recognized monthly based on an average number of end-users managed and calculated on a pre-determined service fee per user. For bundled services, the Company provides both network administration as well as mobile airtime management services. Revenues for bundled services are recognized monthly based on an average number of end-users managed and mobile air time and calculated based on a pre-determined service fee. Technical services that meet the criteria to be separated as a separate unit of accounting are recognized as the services are performed. Otherwise they are deferred and recognized over the contract term. Our arrangements with customers do not provide the customer with the right to take possession of the software supporting the cloud-based application service at any time.

 


Telecommunication revenues were recognized when delivery occurred based on a pre-determined rate and number of user minutes and number of calls that the Company has managed in a given month.

 

Professional services and other revenue include fees from consultation services to support the business process mapping, configuration, data migration, integration and training. Amounts that have been invoiced are recorded in accounts receivable and in net billings in excess of revenues or revenue, depending on whether the revenue recognition criteria have been met. Revenue for professional and consulting services in connection with an implementation or implantation of a new customer that is deemed not to have stand-alone value is recognized over the contractual period commencing when the subscription service is made available to the customer. Revenue from other professional services that provide added value such as new features or enhancements to the platform that are deemed to have standalone value to the customer or are sold separately from the original hosting arrangement, are deferred and revenue recognition occurs when the feature is activated.

 

31

The Company used revenue recognition standards for ASC 605 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and adopted the revenue recognition standards for ASC 606 beginning on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method and applied these standards for the full year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Cost of servicerevenues and Operating Expenses

Cost of servicerevenues includes origination, termination, network and billing charges from telecommunications operators, costs of telecommunications service providers, materials and supplies, network costs, data center costs, facility cost of hosting network and equipment and cost in providing resale arrangements with long distance service providers, cost of leasing transmission facilities, international gateway switches for voice, data transmission services, and the cost of professional services of staff directly related to the generation of revenues, consisting primarily of employee-related costs associated with these services, including share-based expenses and the cost of subcontractors. Cost of servicerevenues excludes depreciation and amortization.

Income taxes

We estimate our income taxes separately for each tax jurisdiction in which we conduct operations. The provision for federal, state, foreign and local income taxes is calculated on income before income taxes based on current tax law and includes the cumulative effect of any changes in tax rates from those used previously in determining deferred tax assets and liabilities. Such provision differs from the amounts currently payable because certain items of income and expense are recognized in different reporting periods for financial reporting purposes than for income tax purposes.

We record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. In determining the net deferred tax assets and valuation allowances, we are required to make judgments and estimates in assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets. In making such determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent results of operations. If we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount or would no longer be able to realize our deferred income tax assets in the future as currently recorded, we would make an adjustment to the valuation allowance which would decrease or increase the provision for income taxes.

 

Share-based Compensation

 

Effective January 1, 2006, we adoptedThe Company follows the provisions of ASC 718 “Compensation-Stock Compensation”, using the prospective approach. As a result, we recognize share-based compensation expense for only those awards that are granted subsequent to December 31, 2005 and any previously existing awards that are subject to variable accounting, including certain share options that were exercised with convertible notes in 2003, until the awards are exercised, forfeited, or contractually expire in accordance with the prospective method and the transition rules of Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718.718”). Under ASC 718, share-based awards granted after December 31, 2005, are recorded at fair value as of the grant date and recognized as expense with an adjustment for forfeiture over the employee’s requisite service period (the vesting period, generally three years), which we have elected to amortizethe Company amortizes on a straight-line basis.

 

For both the long term contractors and advisory board members, we recognize the guidance for share-based compensation awards to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505-50 “Equity-BasedEquity-Based Payments to Non-Employees”Non-Employees (“ASC 505-50”). Under ASC 505-50, we determine the fair value of the options or share-based compensation awards granted as either the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.

 

Share-based compensation (cash and non-cash) related to equity plans for employees and non-employee directors are included within our cost of revenues and operating expenses.


Warrant and Conversion feature derivative liabilities

Warrants and convertible notes that are accounted for as derivative liabilities are remeasured at fair value each reporting period in accordance with the provisions of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”). The Company utilizes the Monte Carlo valuation model to determine the value of the outstanding warrants and the conversion feature in the convertible notes. Since the Monte Carlo valuation model requires special software and expertise to model the assumptions to be used, the Company uses a third-party valuation expert to fair value the derivative liabilities.

 

Business Combinations

 

We generally recognize the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interests in an acquiree at their fair values as of the date of acquisition, under the purchase method of accounting. We measure goodwill as the excess of consideration transferred, which we also measure at fair value, over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The acquisition method of accounting requires us to exercise judgment and make significant estimates and assumptions regarding the fair values of the elements of a business combination as of the date of acquisition, including the fair values of identifiable intangible assets, deferred tax asset valuation allowances, liabilities related to uncertain tax positions, and contingencies. This method also requires us to refine these estimates over a one-year measurement period to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the measurement of the amounts recognized as of that date. If we are required to retroactively adjust provisional amounts that we have recorded for the fair value of assets and liabilities in connection with acquisitions, these adjustments could materially decrease our operating income and net income and result in lower asset values on our balance sheet.

 

Significant estimates and assumptions that we must make in estimating the fair value of acquired technology, customer lists, and other identifiable intangible assets include future cash flows that we expect to generate from the acquired assets. If the subsequent actual results and updated projections of the underlying business activity change compared with the assumptions and projections used to develop these values, we could record impairment charges. In addition, we have estimated the economic lives of certain acquired assets and these lives are used to calculate depreciation and amortization expense. If our estimates of the economic lives change, depreciation or amortization expenses could be accelerated or slowed.

 

32

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Impairment

 

Intangible AssetsGoodwill is not amortized, but is tested for impairment on an annual basis and Impairmentbetween annual tests whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an operating segment, or one level below the operating segment. We operate in one operating segment, which is our only reporting unit.

We test for an indication of long Lived Assetsgoodwill impairment in the fourth quarter of each year, or sooner, when indicators of impairment exist, by comparing the fair value of our reporting unit to its carrying value. If there is an indication of impairment, we perform a “step two” test to measure the impairment. Impairments, if any, are recorded to the statement of operations in the period the impairment is recognized.

A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators include a sustained and significant decline in our stock price and market capitalization, a decline in our expected future cash flows, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate and unanticipated competition. There was no goodwill impairment for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

In accordance with ASC 350Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment charges. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives of the assets, between three and ten years. Other intangible assets are reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 350, on an annual basis, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Measurement of any impairment loss for long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets that management expects to hold and use, is based on the amount of the carrying value that exceeds the fair value of the asset. This is a critical accounting policy because ofThere was no intangible asset impairment for the judgementyears ended December 31, 2018 and estimates involved.2017.

 


Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In June 2016,See Note 2 to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurementconsolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” (“ASU 2016-13”) which requires measurement and recognitionthis report for a discussion of expected versus incurred credit losses for financial assets held. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company’s annual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted on January 1, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements; however at the current time the Company does not know what impact the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements, financial condition or results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”). The updated guidance changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payment awards to employees, including therecent accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The update to the standard is effective for the Company’s annual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-09 on its consolidated financial statements; however at the current time the Company does not know what impact the adoption of ASU 2016-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements, financial condition or results of operations.pronouncements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net).” This update provides clarifying guidance regarding the application of ASU 2014-09 when another party, along with the reporting entity, is involved in providing a good or a service to a customer. In these circumstances, an entity is required to determine whether the nature of its promise is to provide that good or service to the customer (that is, the entity is a principal) or to arrange for the good or service to be provided to the customer by the other party (that is, the entity is an agent). In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” which clarifies the identification of performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-11, “Revenue Recognition and Derivatives and Hedging: Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 Emerging Issues Task Force Meeting (“EITF”),” which rescinds SEC paragraphs pursuant to SEC staff announcements. These rescissions include changes to topics pertaining to accounting for shipping and handling fees and costs and accounting for consideration given by a vendor to a customer. In May 2016, the FASB also issued ASU No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,” which provides clarifying guidance in certain narrow areas and adds some practical expedients. The effective dates for these ASU’s are the same as the effective date for ASU No. 2014-09, for the Company’s annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of these ASU’s on its consolidated financial statements; however at the current time the Company is determining the impact the adoption of these ASU’s will have on its consolidated financial statements, financial condition or results of operations.

33

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Management is currently assessing the impact of this pronouncement on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10).” ASU 2016-01 enhances the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information by addressing certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The amendments simplify certain requirements and also reduce diversity in current practice for other requirements. ASU 2016-01 is effective for public companies’ fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Except for the early application guidance specifically allowed in ASU 2016-01, early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of ASU 2016-01 on our consolidated financial statements and have not yet determined the method by which we will adopt the standard.

On April 7, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”, which requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability, similar to the presentation of debt discounts. ASU 2015-03 is effective for public companies’ fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The Company has elected for early adoption and included it in their Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01, Income Statement — Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items (“ASU 2015-01”). ASU 2015-01 eliminates the concept of extraordinary items from GAAP but retains the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently and expands the guidance to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply ASU 2015-01 prospectively. A reporting entity may also apply ASU 2015-01 retrospectively to all periods presented in the financial statements. We believe the adoption of ASU 2015-01 will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows - Restricted Cash a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force.” This standard requires restricted cash and cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows under the retrospective transition approach. The guidance will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. When adopted, the Company is expected to include restricted cash and cash equivalents with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of the cash flows.

 

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

We are a “smaller reporting company” as defined by regulation S-K and as such, are not required to provide the information contained in this item pursuant to regulation S-K.

 

34

 

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

Pareteum Corporation

AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 PAGE
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM3648
  
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 20162018 (Restated) AND 201520173750
  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20162018 (Restated) AND 201520173851
  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20162018 (Restated) AND 201520173952
  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20162018 (Restated) AND 201520174053
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Restated)41-7554

 

35


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Pareteum Corporation

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pareteum Corporation (formerly Elephant Talk Communications Corp. or the “Company”)and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015, and2017, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. Theseended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether(collectively, the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pareteum Corporationthe Company as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (Untied States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. Our report dated December 14, 2020 expressed an opinion that the Company had not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.

Going Concern Uncertainty

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, hasnegative cash flows from operations and had an accumulated deficit of $287,080,234 and has negative working capital.$317.1 million as of December 31, 2018. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In addition, with respect to the ongoing and evolving coronavirus (“COVID-19”) outbreak, which was designated as a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020, the outbreak has cause substantial disruption in international and U.S. economies and markets and if repercussions of the outbreak are prolonged, could have a significant adverse impact on the Company’s business. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also are described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

/s/ Squar Milner,Restatement

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the 2018 financial statements have been restated to correct misstatements related to revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, business combinations, foreign currency translation and settlement of payables.

Change in Accounting Principle Related to Revenue Recognition

As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018 due to the adoption of the Accounting Standards Codification 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.”

Emphasis of Matter

As discussed in Note 28 to the financial statements, in the fourth quarter of 2019 the Company expects to record an impairment charge estimated at approximately $123,168,000 related to goodwill and finite-lived intangible assets acquired in connection with the acquisition of Artilium plc.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Baker Tilly US, LLP (formerly Squar Milner LLP)

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

 

Los Angeles, California

March 29, 2017

December 14, 2020

 

36


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
ASSETS        
         
CURRENT ASSETS        
         
Cash and cash equivalents $931,189  $369,250 
Financing receivable  -   272,425 
Restricted cash  564,018   246,151 
Accounts receivable, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $88,528 at December 31, 2016 and $269,608 at December 31, 2015  614,670   1,112,032 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,084,994   2,016,236 
   Total current assets  3,194,871   4,016,094 
         
NON-CURRENT ASSETS        
         
OTHER ASSETS  129,037   473,893 
         
NOTE RECEIVABLE  1,012,603   - 
         
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET  8,708,778   13,051,375 
         
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET  -   258,630 
         
ASSETS HELD FOR SALE  -   4,564,972 
         
GOODWILL  -   3,027,422 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $13,045,289  $25,392,386 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable and customer deposits  2,316,768   2,639,863 
Obligations under capital leases (current portion)  10,813   310,403 
Net billings in excess of revenues  951,791   1,259,545 
Accrued expenses and other payables  6,013,620   5,031,712 
Senior Secured Loan - Short Term (Principal repayments coming 12 months)  4,000,000   5,580,277 
   Total current liabilities  13,292,992   14,821,800 
         
LONG TERM LIABILITIES        
Derivative liabilities  4,265,829   945,618 
Non-current portion of obligation under capital leases  -   5,621 
Other long term liabilities  192,980   260,290 
Unsecured Convertible Promissory Note (net of Debt Discount and Debt Issuance)  821,048   238,829 
Senior Secured Loan - Long Term (net of Debt Discount, Debt Issuance and Principal repayments coming 12 months)  3,715,662   - 
Non-current portion of net billings in excess of revenues  121,309   1,066,687 
   Total long term liabilities  9,116,828   2,517,045 
         
   Total liabilities  22,409,820   17,338,845 
         
Commitments and Contingencies (See Notes)        
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
Preferred Stock $0.00001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 249 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016  2,143,196   - 
Common Stock $0.00001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 8,376,267 issued and outstanding  as of December 31, 2016 and 6,455,055 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015  280,653,362   269,470,165 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (5,086,902)  (5,789,975)
Accumulated deficit  (287,080,234)  (255,635,531)
   Pareteum Corporation stockholders’ (deficit) equity  (9,370,578)  8,044,659 
         
NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST  6,047   8,882 
   Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity  (9,364,531)  8,053,541 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) $13,045,289  $25,392,386 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

37

Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

  2016  2015 
REVENUES $12,855,811  $31,015,453 
         
COST AND OPERATING EXPENSES        
Cost of service (excluding depreciation and amortization)  3,658,667   5,926,291 
Product development  3,543,590   4,543,492 
Sales and marketing  1,340,959   2,633,958 
General and administrative  11,708,151   11,649,914 
Restructuring charges  1,638,049   1,254,598 
Depreciation and amortization of intangibles assets  4,246,787   6,623,985 
Impairment for assets held and used  850,985   2,681,407 
Impairment of goodwill  3,228,930   - 
Loss on sale of assets  1,542,374   - 
  Total cost and operating expenses  31,758,492   35,313,645 
         
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (18,902,681)  (4,298,192)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)        
Interest income  112,169   106,028 
Interest expense  (1,228,201)  (1,488,203)
Interest expense related to debt discount and conversion feature  (6,041,607)  (682,389)
Changes in derivative liabilities  (3,316,199)  299,948 
(Loss) Gain on Extinguishment of Debt  (541,899)  2,475,799 
Other income and (expense), net  (220,927)  (922,894)
Amortization of deferred financing costs  (1,267,073)  (513,557)
     Total other (expense)  (12,503,737)  (725,268)
         
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (31,406,418)  (5,023,460)
Provision (Benefit) for income taxes  38,286   (17,225)
NET LOSS  (31,444,704)  (5,006,235)
         
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS        
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)  703,073   (2,662,843)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(30,741,631) $(7,669,078)
         
Net loss per common share and equivalents – basic $(4.67) $(0.79)
         
Net loss per common share and equivalents – diluted $(4.67) $(0.79)
         
Weighted average shares outstanding during the period – basic  6,738,971   6,328,082 
         
Weighted average shares outstanding during the period – diluted  6,738,971   6,328,082 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2018  2017 
  (As Restated)    
ASSETS        
         
CURRENT ASSETS                  
Cash and cash equivalents $6,051,709  $13,537,899 
Restricted cash  430,655   199,776 
Accounts receivable, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $513,575 at December 31, 2018 and $90,173 at December 31, 2017  3,338,214   2,058,284 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,083,950   900,369 
Total current assets  11,904,528   16,696,328 
         
NON- CURRENT ASSETS                  
         
OTHER ASSETS  45,336   91,267 
         
NOTES RECEIVABLE, NON-CURRENT  1,082,436   594,520 
         
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET  5,443,775   4,713,710 
         
LONG-TERM INVESTMENT  -   3,230,208 
         
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET  39,658,325   - 
         
GOODWILL  101,374,874   - 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $159,509,274  $25,326,033 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES                  
Accounts payable and customer deposits $10,337,627  $1,978,726 
Net billings in excess of revenues  227,304   242,986 
Accrued expenses and other payables  7,740,828   5,250,130 
Promissory notes  681,220   - 

9% Unsecured subordinate convertible promissory notes (current portion net of debt discount and debt issuance costs)

  106,967   66,000 
Total current liabilities  19,093,946   7,537,842 
         
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES                   
Derivative liabilities  -   1,597,647 
Other long-term liabilities  212,703   151,163 
Unsecured convertible notes (non-current portion net of debt discount and debt issuance costs)  -   617,848 
Deferred income tax liabilities  8,385,748   - 
Related party loan  341,998   - 
Total long-term liabilities  8,940,449   2,366,658 
         
Total liabilities  28,034,395   9,904,500 
         
Commitments and Contingencies (See Notes)        
         
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Preferred Stock $0.00001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 0 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017  -   - 
Common Stock $0.00001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 98,292,530 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 46,617,093 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017  453,995,240   321,271,437 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (5,388,675)  (6,306,691)
Accumulated deficit  (317,131,686)  (299,543,213)
Total stockholders' equity  131,474,879   15,421,533 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $159,509,274  $25,326,033 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

38

Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20162018 AND 20152017

 

  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Other
comprehensive
  Accum-
 mulated
  Total stock-
 holders
 Equity
 
Description Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  loss  Deficit  (Deficit) 
Balance - December 31, 2014  -  $-   6,186,850  $264,359,674  $(3,127,132) $(250,629,296) $10,603,246 
Shares issued for warrant exercises  -   -   161,189   1,727,487   -   -   1,727,487 
Shares issued for employee stock option exercises  -   -   346   5,861   -   -   5,861 
Shares issued for board and management compensation  -   -   106,668   1,150,678   -   -   1,150,678 
Shares issued for acquisitions  -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Shares issued to consultants  -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Shares to be issued to officers and employees  -   -   -   24,305   -   -   24,305 
Amortization of Stock Options expense  -   -   -   1,814,531   -   -   1,814,531 
Costs attributable to share issuances  -   -   -   (65,000)  -   -   (65,000)
FMV of warrants issued classified as Debt Discount  -   -   -   452,629   -   -   452,629 
Other comprehensive loss due to foreign exchange rate translation net of tax  -   -   -   -   (2,662,843)  -   (2,662,843)
Net Loss  -   -   -   -   -   (5,006,235)  (5,006,235)
Reverse Stock Split Rounding  -   -   2   -   -   -   - 
Balance - December 31, 2015  -   -   6,455,055   269,470,165   (5,789,975)  (255,635,531)  8,044,659 
Preferred Stock  249   2,490,000       -           2,490,000 
Shares issued for warrant exercises  -   -   120,000   397,200   -   -   397,200 
Shares issued for board and management compensation  -   -   104,671   668,642   -   -   668,642 
Shares issued for Settlement of Debt  -   -   408,257   1,418,505   -   -   1,418,505 
Shares issued for Conversion of Notes  -   -   1,009,373   5,238,329   -   -   5,238,329 
Shares issued for Loan Amendments  -   -   46,315   153,305   -   -   153,305 
Stock awards issued to Management  -   -   160,000   711,900   -   -   711,900 
Stock awards issued to Staff  -   -   39,166   106,232   -   -   106,232 
Shares issued to consultants  -   -   33,427   77,105       -   77,105 
Shares to be issued to officers and employees  -   -   -   669,908   -   -   669,908 
Amortization of Stock Options expense  -   -   -   1,674,247   -   -   1,674,247 
Expenses attributable to share issuances  -   (346,804)  -   (21,252)  -   -   (368,056)
Repricing of warrants issued classified as Debt Discount  -   -   -   89,076   -   -   89,076 
Other comprehensive loss due to foreign exchange rate translation net of tax  -   -   -   -   703,073   -   703,073 
Net Loss  -   -   -   -   -   (31,444,703)  (31,444,703)
Reverse Stock Split Rounding  -   -   3   -   -   -   - 
Balance - December 31, 2016  249  $2,143,196   8,376,267  $280,653,362  $(5,086,902) $(287,080,234) $(9,370,578)

  For the year ended December 31, 
  2018  2017 
  (As Restated)    
REVENUES $20,257,605  $13,547,507 
         
COST AND OPERATING EXPENSES        
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization)  10,054,030   3,683,609 
Product development  3,082,956   1,479,587 
Sales and marketing  3,197,406   1,575,069 
General and administrative  17,329,163   10,097,027 
Restructuring and acquisition costs  7,259,561   966,292 
Depreciation and amortization  5,427,029   4,533,109 
Total cost and operating expenses  46,350,145   22,334,693 
         
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (26,092,540)  (8,787,186)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)        
Interest income  184,511   172,253 
Interest expense  (308,742)  (1,654,418)
Interest expense related to debt discount and conversion feature  (184,308)  (3,408,735)
Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities  1,283,914   794,691 
Gain on extinguishment of debt  -   163,835 
Gain on equity investment  6,370,787   - 
Other income and (expense), net  577,537   705,140 
Amortization of deferred financing costs  (28,711)  (341,354)
Total other income (expense)  7,894,988   (3,568,588)
         
LOSS BEFORE (BENEFIT) PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (18,197,552)  (12,355,774)
Income tax (benefit) provision  (173,918)  107,205 
NET LOSS  (18,023,634)  (12,462,979)
         
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS        
Foreign currency translation loss  (199,971)  (1,219,782)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(18,223,605) $(13,682,761)
         
Net loss per common share and equivalents - basic $(0.28) $(0.76)
         
Net loss per common share and equivalents - diluted $(0.28) $(0.76)
         
Weighted average shares outstanding during the period – basic  64,548,533   16,338,156 
         
Weighted average shares outstanding during the period – diluted  64,548,533   16,338,156 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

39


 

Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSCHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20162018 AND 20152017

 

  2016  2015 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net loss $(31,444,704) $(5,006,235)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  4,246,787   6,623,985 
Provision for doubtful accounts  (88,528)  269,608 
Stock based compensation  3,897,437   3,481,908 
Change in fair value of warrant liability  3,316,199   (299,948)
Amortization of deferred financing costs  1,267,073   513,557 
Interest expense relating to debt discount and conversion feature  6,041,607   682,389 
Other (income) and expense, net  220,927   922,894 
Loss (Gain) on Extinguishment of Debt  541,899   (2,475,799)
Impairment for assets held and  used  850,985   2,681,407 
Impairment of goodwill  3,228,930   - 
Loss on sale of assets  1,542,374   - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Decrease in accounts receivable  621,532   6,566,499 
Decrease in prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets  1,637,006   759,275 
Increase in accounts payable and customer deposits  80,520   2,627,745 
Decrease in net billings in excess of revenues  (1,169,136)  (9,753,225)
Increase in accrued expenses and other payables  1,551,261   1,385,775 
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities  (3,657,831)  8,979,835 
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Purchases of property and equipment  (1,413,160)  (7,709,972)
Advance Purchase Payment on “Assets held for Sale”  450,000   - 
Proceeds from sale of assets  2,000,000   - 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  1,036,840   (7,709,972)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Financing receivable  355,000   1,645,000 
Exercise of warrants & options  -   5,861 
Equity and Debt issuance costs paid  (1,338,821)  (532,558)
Principal payment on 2014 10% + Eurodollar 3rd Party Loan  (966,809)  (5,500,000)
Proceeds from convertible promissory note  2,273,000   1,275,000 
Unsecured promissory note  350,000   - 
Gross proceed from Preferred A and A-1 shares issuance  2,490,000   - 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  3,162,370   (3,106,697)
         
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  20,560   301,924 
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  561,939   (1,534,910)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD  369,250   1,904,160 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF THE PERIOD $931,189  $369,250 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
         
Cash paid during the period for interest $909,637  $1,136,021 
Cash paid during the period for income taxes  15,581   14,771 
NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Note receivable from sale of assets $1,000,000  $- 
NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Conversion of 9% unsecured convertible note $5,238,329  $- 
Shares issued for payables $700,425  $- 

                    Total stock- 
              Accumulated other     holders 
  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  comprehensive  Accumulated  Equity 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  loss  Deficit  (Deficit) 
                      
Balance - December 31, 2016  249   2,143,196   8,376,267  $280,653,362  $(5,086,902) $(287,080,234) $(9,370,578)
     ��                       
Preferred Stock (Issuance)  4,034   3,691,110   -   -   -   -   3,691,110 
Preferred Stock (Conversions)  (4,283)  (6,181,110)  5,836,020   6,181,110   -   -   - 
Shares issued for warrant exercises  -   -   4,865,743   5,049,905   -   -   5,049,905 
Shares issued for Equity Fundraises  -   -   21,420,379   21,202,239   -   -   21,202,239 
Shares issued/exchanges for Strategic Partnership  -   -   3,200,332   3,230,208   -   -   3,230,208 
Shares issued for board and management compensation  -   -   17,631   49,146   -   -   49,146 
Shares issued for Settlement of Debt  -   -   804,193   784,054   -   -   784,054 
Shares issued for Conversion of Notes  -   -   243,564   630,366   -   -   630,366 
Warrants issued attributable to loan amendments  -   -   -   2,530,605   -   -   2,530,605 
Stock awards issued to Management  -   -   1,527,880   1,470,540   -   -   1,470,540 
Stock awards issued to Staff  -   -   68,393   102,134   -   -   102,134 
Shares issued to consultants  -   -   248,396   299,501   -   -   299,501 
Shares to be issued  -   -   -   463,716   -   -   463,716 
Amortization of Stock Options expense  -   -   -   1,318,020   -   -   1,318,020 
Expenses attributable to share issuances  -   346,804   -   (3,267,682)  -   -   (2,920,878)
Warrants issued attributable to share issuances  -   -       162,689   -   -   162,689 
Warrants issued/repriced as part of IR management services  -   -   -   462,320   -   -   462,320 
Movements on Non-Corporate Equity Accounts  -   -       (50,796)  -   -   (50,796)
Other comprehensive loss due to foreign exchange rate translation net of tax  -   -   -   -   (1,219,782)  -   (1,219,782)
Net Loss  -   -   -   -   -   (12,462,979)  (12,462,979)
Net reverse stock split rounding and share cancellations  -   -   8,295   -   (7)      (7)
Balance - December 31, 2017  -   -   46,617,093   321,271,437   (6,306,691)  (299,543,213)  15,421,533 
Cumulative impact of accounting errors in previously reported consolidated financial statements  -   -   -   (247,697)  1,117,987   327,641   1,197,931 
ASC 606 transition adjustment  -   -   -   -   -   107,520   107,520 
Balance - January 1, 2018 (as restated)  -   -   46,617,093   321,023,740   (5,188,704)  (299,108,052)  16,726,984 
Shares issued for acquisition  -   -   37,511,447   112,534,809   -   -   112,534,809 
Shares cancelled, at par, in acquisition          (3,200,332)  (32)  -   -   (32)
Shares issued for warrant exercises  -   -   11,111,780   6,114,863   -   -   6,114,863 
Shares issued for Equity Fundraises  -   -   2,440,000   6,100,002   -   -   6,100,002 
Expenses attributable to share issuances  -   -   13,400   (700,817)  -   -   (700,817)
Stock-based compensation  -   -   -   6,754,879   -   -   6,754,879 
Shares issued for Settlement of accounts payable  -   -   375,857   794,333   -   -   794,333 
Shares issued for Conversion of Notes  -   -   410,205   1,314,243   -   -   1,314,243 
Shares issued for Exercised Stock Options  -   -   59,220   59,220   -   -   59,220 
Vesting of restricted and common stock awards  -   -   2,953,860   -   -   -   - 

Other comprehensive loss due to foreign exchange rate translation, net of tax

  -   -   -       (199,971)  -   (199,971)
Net Loss  -   -   -   -   -   (18,023,634)  (18,023,634)
Balance - December 31, 2018, (as restated)  -   -   98,292,530  $453,995,240  $(5,388,675) $(317,131,686) $131,474,879 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

  2018  2017 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES (As restated)    
Net loss $(18,023,634) $(12,462,979)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  5,427,029   4,533,109 
Provision for doubtful accounts  137,352   2,845 
Stock-based compensation  6,782,759   4,289,033 
Change in fair value of warrant liability  (1,283,914)  (794,691)
Amortization of deferred financing costs  28,711   341,354 
Interest expense relating to debt discount and conversion feature  184,308   3,408,735 
Shares issued for services  822,164   784,054 
Gain on equity investment  (6,370,787)  - 
Deferred income taxes  (255,296)  - 
Loss on disposal of assets  38,916   - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisition:        
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable  1,541,092   (1,446,459)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets  (628,745)  640,478 
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and customer deposits  4,649,913   (349,039)
Increase (decrease) in net billings in excess of revenues  84,349   (830,114)
(Decrease) in accrued expenses and other payables  (954,282)  (732,486)
Net cash used in operating activities  (7,820,065)  (2,616,160)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Purchases of property, equipment and software development  (3,707,016)  (721,823)
Acquisition of Artilium plc, net of cash acquired  (7,317,666)  - 
Purchase of note  (500,000)  - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (11,524,682)  (721,823)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Increase in short term loans  547,522   - 
Exercise of warrants and options  6,174,083   5,049,905 
Equity and debt issuance costs paid  -   (227,584)
Repayment on loans  (81,194)  - 
Gross proceeds from public offering  6,100,002   21,202,239 
Financing related fees  (632,900)  - 
Reclassify accrued interest to principal (Saffelberg Advance)  -   (83,634)
Principal repayment to senior secured lender  -   (10,081,836)
Net cash provided by financing activities  12,107,513   15,859,090 
         
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH  (18,077)  (278,639)
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH  (7,255,311)  12,242,468 
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD  13,737,675   1,495,207 
         
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, END OF PERIOD $6,482,364  $13,737,675 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash received during the period for interest $202,262  $129,390 
Cash paid during the period for interest $(120,530) $(1,494,527)
Cash (paid) received during the period for income taxes $(34,414) $2,359 
NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Shares issued to Artilium and Artilium shareholders $112,534,809  $3,230,208 
NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Conversion of notes, including converted accumulated interest $1,314,243  $630,366 
Conversion of 9% unsecured convertible note $678,372  $- 
Shares issued for settlement of payables $794,333  $784,054 
Conversion of preferred shares $-  $6,181,110 
Amendments and fair market value adjustments to warrants liabilities and convertible feature liability $313,860  $2,668,183 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Restatement

As previously disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Pareteum Corporation (the “Company” or “Pareteum”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on October 21, 2019, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company determined that the Company’s previously issued financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 and the interim periods contained therein (collectively, the “Non-Reliance Periods”) could no longer be relied upon. As a result, the Company is filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this “Amendment”) to amend and restate the Company’s original Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, which was filed with the SEC on March 18, 2019 (the “Original Form 10-K”).

The Board’s decision to restate the Company’s financial statements is based on the Company’s conclusion that certain revenues and the corresponding costs recognized during the year ended December 31, 2018, and in each of the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2018 should not have been recorded during the periods. This Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements discloses the nature of the restatement matters and their impact on the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018. Restated unaudited quarterly financial data for the interim periods in 2018 is presented in Note 27 – “Unaudited Quarterly Data (Restated)” and is, collectively with the restated annual information, referred to as the “Restatement”.

This Amendment reflects the correction of the following errors identified subsequent to the filing of the Original Form 10-K:

A. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company determined that it incorrectly recognized revenue prior to customers obtaining control of certain products or customer acceptance requirement provisions in contracts, due to an ineffective review of information provided by the sales and procurement teams. As a result, customers had not obtained control of the products in accordance with ASC 606-10-25-30. The primary net effect of the corrections of these errors on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss resulted in reductions in total Revenues, Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization) and General and Administrative expenses of $11,970,649, $255,364 and $1,001,493, respectively. Additionally, the Company determined that its accounting for activation fees under ASC 606 was incorrect. The Company had recognized the revenue upfront for activation fees versus being deferred and recognized over the life of the customer. The effect of the correction of this error was a reduction in Revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss and a corresponding increase in Net billings in excess of revenue on the Consolidated Balance Sheet of $197,223. See tables below for the full impact of this matter on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

B. The Company determined adjustments were needed to correct the financial statement presentation due to immaterial accounting errors in the Company’s previously reported consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company made the following adjustments:

40i.The Company determined that it had incorrectly recognized revenue on certain product sales prior to customers obtaining control of the products in accordance with ASC 606-10-25-30; this was also due to an ineffective review of information provided by the sales and procurement teams. Correction of these immaterial errors resulted in reduction in Accounts receivable of $184,856; and increases to Other comprehensive loss and Accumulated deficit of $8,192 and $176,664, respectively as of January 1, 2018, to adjust for the cumulative impact of the errors as of the beginning of the earliest period presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

 

ii.Through a review of its accounting for stock-based compensation, the Company identified immaterial errors in its recording of stock-based compensation expense for equity-classified awards granted to employees and non-employees in 2017. The employee awards were granted with vesting provisions ratably over a one- or two-year period and thus, in accordance with ASC 718, stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period. The Company incorrectly recognized the stock-based compensation expense related to these awards at the time of grant. For awards granted to non-employees, stock-based compensation which subsequently vests through-out the term of the agreement, the amount of stock-based compensation recorded would be up to the vesting date. The Company incorrectly recognized the stock-based compensation expense related to these awards at the time of grant. The net effect of these immaterial errors resulted in reductions to Common Stock and Accumulated Deficit of $504,305 as of January 1, 2018 to adjust for the cumulative impact of the errors as of the beginning of the earliest period presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

The Company also determined that at December 31, 2017 it incorrectly recorded equity-classified share-based awards as liability-classified awards and recorded stock-based compensation expense of $256,609 to Accrued expenses and other payables instead of recording to Common Stock in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet and reflecting such amount in the Company’s Consolidated Statements Of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity(Deficit). The effect of this immaterial error was an increase to Common Stock and a decrease to Accrued expenses and other payables as of January 1, 2018.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

iii.The Company incorrectly translated its property and equipment balances at December 31, 2017 using a historical rate and not the current exchange rate at the balance sheet reporting date in accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters. Correction of these immaterial errors resulted in an increase in Property and Equipment, net of $1,126,178 with a corresponding decrease to Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of January 1, 2018, to adjust for the cumulative impact of the errors (matter “B”) as of the beginning of the earliest period presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. During 2018, the Company continued to use the incorrect historical rate to translate its property and equipment balances and not the current exchange rate at the balance sheet reporting date. The correction of these errors at December 31, 2018 resulted in a decrease in Property and Equipment, net at December 31, 2018 of $235,652 and a corresponding increase in Accumulated other comprehensive loss by the same amount. In the tables presented below, the impact of the error on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 is included in matter “E”.

In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 99, Materiality, and SAB No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, the Company evaluated the materiality of the errors from a qualitative and quantitative perspective and concluded that the effect of the errors were not material to our previously issued consolidated financial statements.

C. The accounting errors in recording stock-based compensation expense for the stock awards granted in 2017 discussed above impacted the Company’s results of operations in the current year. For certain grants of equity-classified awards granted during the year ended December 31, 2018 to employees and non-employees, the Company identified errors in recording stock-based compensation expense for the same reason noted above. The Company also determined that stock-based compensation expense related to the grant of options in 2018 was not being expensed over the appropriate vesting period. The impact of this error was isolated to the second and third quarter of 2018 with an offsetting effect between the two quarters. The aggregate impact of the Company’s error in recording stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 from this matter was a decrease in Loss from operations of $126,634. In addition, the Company identified incorrect accounting for stock-based compensation expense related to cancelled awards. This error resulted in an increase in the Loss from Operations of $327,107. Other immaterial errors in recording stock-based compensation expense was also identified by the Company. See tables below for the full impact of this matter on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

D. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company determined that it incorrectly accounted for extinguishments of accounts payables for which the Company issued shares to settle the outstanding balances of accounts payable. In accordance with ASC 470-50-40-2, the difference between the reacquisition price of the debt and the net carrying amount of the extinguished debt is recognized as a loss or gain in the period of extinguishment. The reacquisition price includes the fair value of any assets transferred or equity securities issued. The correction of these errors on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt, recorded in General and administrative expense, of $143,526 and a corresponding increase in Common stock on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. See tables below for the full impact of this matter on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

E. In addition to the matters described above in A, B, C, and D the Company also corrected for immaterial misstatements, including misstatements in certain footnotes, identified during an account review and analysis exercise.

F. The Company identified that it had misstatements in its application of purchase accounting for its acquisition of Artilium plc in October 2018. In accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, for a business combination achieved in stages the acquirer must measure its previously held equity interests in the acquiree at its acquisition-date fair value and recognize the resulting gain or loss, if any, in earnings. The fair value of previously held equity interest in the acquiree is included in the calculation of goodwill. The Company did not appropriately remeasure its previously held equity interest in Artilium at its acquisition-date fair value and record its resulting gain. The correction of this error on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss resulted in a gain on equity investment of $6,370,787 and a corresponding increase in Goodwill on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company also erroneously wrote off its equity investment in Artilium of $3,230,208 by reducing Common stock versus applying it to the calculation of goodwill. In addition, the Company identified errors in its preparation of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows to account for the net of effect of the acquisition and adjusted the impact on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed to appropriately account for cash flows for post-acquisition activity. See tables below for the full impact of this matter on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table sets forth a summary of where the restatement adjustments had an effect on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018:

   As reported   Adjustments       As restated 
ASSETS                
Accounts receivable, net $15,361,594  $(11,829,269)   A  $3,338,214 
       (184,856)   B     
       (9,255)   E     
Total current assets  23,927,908   (12,023,380)      11,904,528 
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET  4,553,250   1,126,178    B   5,443,775 
       (235,653)   E     
GOODWILL  91,773,911   9,600,963    F   101,374,874 
Total assets $161,041,166  $(1,531,892)     $159,509,274 
LIABILITIES                
Accounts payable and customer deposits $10,337,629  $(2)   A  $10,337,627 
Net billings in excess of revenues  927,780   (700,476)   A   227,304 
Accrued expenses and other payables  7,952,380   (361,963)   A   7,740,828 
       14,954    C     
       135,457    E     
Total current liabilities  20,005,976   (912,030)      19,093,946 
Deferred income tax liabilities  8,415,825   (30,077)   E   8,385,748 
Total long-term liabilities  8,970,526   (30,077)      8,940,449 
Total liabilities  28,976,502   (942,107)      28,034,395 
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY                
Common stock  450,990,827   (611,824)   B   453,995,240 
       190,074    C     
       143,526    D     
       52,461    E     
       3,230,176    F     
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (6,300,780)  144,186    A   (5,388,675)
       1,010,466    B     
       (4,556)   C     
       (237,991)   E     
Accumulated deficit  (312,625,383)  (10,911,014)   A   (317,131,686)
       542,680    B     
       (200,472)   C     
       (143,526)   D     
       (164,758)   E     
       6,370,787    F     
Total stockholders’ equity  132,064,664   (589,785)      131,474,879 
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $161,041,166  $(1,531,892)     $159,509,274 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table sets forth a summary of where the restatement adjustments had an effect on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss for the year ended December 31, 2018:

  As Reported  Adjustments     As Restated 
REVENUES $32,435,736  $(12,167,872)   A  $20,257,605 
       (10,259)   E     
                 
COST AND OPERATING EXPENSES                
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization)  10,329,646   (255,364)   A   10,054,030 
       (20,252)   C     
Product development  3,092,776   (9,820)   C   3,082,956 
Sales and Marketing  3,161,234   36,172    C   3,197,406 
General and administrative  17,808,912   (1,001,493)   A   17,329,163 
       194,373    C     
       143,526    D     
       183,845    E     
Restructuring and acquisition costs  7,258,831   730    E   7,259,561 
Total cost and operating expenses  47,078,428   (728,283)      46,350,145 
                 
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (14,642,692)  (11,449,848)      (26,092,540)
                 
OTHER INCOME (LOSS)  1,524,202   6,370,786    EF   7,894,988 
                 
LOSS BEFORE BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES  (13,118,490)  (5,079,062)      (18,197,552)
Income tax benefit  (143,840)  (30,078)   E   (173,918)
NET LOSS  (12,974,650)  (5,048,984)      (18,023,634)
                 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS                
Foreign currency translation loss  5,911   (205,882)   E   (199,971)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(12,968,739) $(5,254,866)     $(18,223,605)
                 
Net loss per common share and equivalents - basic $(0.20)         $(0.28)
Net loss per common share and equivalents - diluted $(0.20)         $(0.28)


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table sets forth a summary of where the restatement adjustments had an effect on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2018:

  As Reported  Adjustments    As Restated 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES             
Net loss $(12,974,650) $(5,048,984) A $(18,023,634)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities             
Provision for doubtful accounts -   31,361  A  137,352 
      105,991  E    
Stock-based compensation 6,582,286   200,473  C  6,782,759 
Shares issued for services 1,075,983   143,526  D  822,164 
      (397,345) E    
Loss on disposal of assets -   38,916  E  38,916 
Gain on equity investment -   (6,370,787) F  (6,370,787)
Deferred income taxes (225,218)  (30,078) E  (255,296)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisition             
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (13,239,269)  11,904,315  A  1,541,092 
      (96,736) E    
      2,972,782  F    
(Increase) in prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets (1,169,435)  30,000  E  (628,745)
      510,690  F    
Increase in accounts payable and customer deposits 5,110,007   1,306  A  4,649,913 
      (461,400) F    
Increase in net billings in excess of revenues 677,191   (700,361) A  84,349 
      107,519  E    
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other payables 2,145,232   (362,121) A  (954,282)
      423,386  E    
      (3,160,779) F    
Net cash used in operating activities (7,661,739)  (158,326)    (7,820,065)
Purchases of property, equipment and software development (4,124,894)  417,878  F  (3,707,016)
Acquisition of Artilium plc, net of cash acquired (7,331,584)  13,918  F  (7,317,666)
Net cash used in investing activities (11,956,478)  431,796     (11,524,682)
Increase in short term loans 812,586   28,025  E  547,522 
      (293,089) F    
Financing related fees (700,817)  67,917  E  (632,900)
Net cash provided by financing activities 12,304,660   (197,147)    12,107,513 
              
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH 58,246   (76,323)    (18,077)
NET DECREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH (7,255,311)  -     (7,255,311)
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD 13,737,675   -     13,737,675 
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, END OF PERIOD 6,482,364  $-    $6,482,364 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 1.2. Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Description of Business

 

Pareteum has developedis an experienced provider of Communications Platform as aCommunications Cloud Services Platform, providing (i) Mobility, (ii) Messaging Service (“CPaaS”) solutions. Pareteum empowers enterprises, communications service providers, early stage innovators, developers, IoT, and (iii) Security servicestelecommunications infrastructure providers with the freedom and applications, with a Single-Sign-On, APIcontrol to create, deliver and software development suite.scale innovative communications experiences. The Pareteum CPaaS solutions connect people and devices around the world using the secure, ubiquitous, and highly scalable solution to deliver data, voice, video, SMS/text messaging, media, and content enablement.

 

Pareteum has developed mobility, messaging, connectivity and security services and applications. The Pareteum platform hosts integrated IT/Back Office and Core Network functionality for mobile network operators and forother enterprises, which allows our customers to implement and leverage mobile communications solutions on a fully outsourced SaaS, PaaS and/or IaaS basis: made available either as an on-premise solution or as a fully hosted service in the Cloud, depending on the needs of our customers.

Pareteum also delivers an Operational Support System (“OSS”) for channel partners, with Application Program Interfaces (“APIs”) for integration with third party systems, workflows for complex application orchestration, customer support with branded portals and plug-ins for a multitude of other applications. These features facilitate and improve the ability of our channel partners to provide support and to drive sales.

 

As of October 1, 2018, the Company now includes Artilium plc, which operates as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Artilium is a software development company active in the enterprise communications and core telecommunications markets delivering software solutions which layer over disparate fixed, mobile and IP networks to enable the deployment of converged communication services and applications.

As of February 12, 2019, the Company now includes iPass Inc., which operates as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. iPass is a cloud-based service provider of global mobile connectivity, offering Wi-Fi access on any mobile device through its SaaS platform.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Liquidity

 

As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company reported net (loss)loss of $(31,444,704)$18,023,634 and $(5,006,235)$12,462,979 for the years ended 2016December 31, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively, and had an accumulated deficit of $(287,080,234)$317,131,686 as of December 31, 2016.2018. The cash balance, including restricted cash, as of the Company at December 31, 20162018, was $ 931,189. Additional capital could be raised during 2017 to cover working capital deficiencies.$6,482,364.

 

On June 8, 2020, the Company issued a $17.5 million 8% Senior Secured Convertible Note (the “High Trail Note”) to High Trail Investments SA LLC (“High Trail”) due April 1, 2025 for an aggregate purchase price of $14 million, of which $7 million is currently maintained in one or more blocked accounts. The Company’sterms of the High Trail Note and related documents require the Company to meet certain specified conditions and covenants, some of which have not been satisfied by the dates required, including (i) the Company filing its restated financial statements throughwith the SEC for (a) the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018, (b) the quarter ended March 31, 2019 and (c) the quarter ended June 30, 2019, in each case on or prior to October 31, 2020, (ii) after October 31, 2020, the Company timely filing its subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or its subsequent annual reports on Form 10-K with the SEC in the manner and within the time periods required under the Exchange Act and (iii) the Company maintaining the listing of its common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market (see Note 28. Subsequent Events). As a result, on December 1, 2020, we entered into a forbearance agreement (the “Forbearance Agreement”) with High Trail under which: (i) we admitted that we were materially impactedin default of several obligations under the High Trail Note and related agreements, (ii) High Trail acknowledged such defaults and agreed not to exercise any right or remedy under the High Trail Note or the related securities purchase agreement, warrant or security documents, including its right to accelerate the aggregate amount outstanding under the High Trail Note, until the earlier of December 31, 2020, the date of any new event of default or initiation of any action by the Company to invalidate any of the representations and warranties made in the Forbearance Agreement. As a result of the defaults, the interest rate paid on the principal outstanding under the High Trail Note increased to 18% per annum. As partial consideration for its agreement to not to exercise any right or remedy under the High Trail financing documents, we agreed with High Trail to make certain changes to the High Trail Note and related agreements. In this regard, we agreed to delete the “Floor Price” of $0.10 that had previously limited the number of events:

·Divestiture of ValidSoft, on September 30, 2016, through a management buyout;

·Financing activity related to issuance of preferred shares and increase in note payable with its senior secured lender;

·Financing activity related to issuance of preferred shares and increase in note payable with its senior secured lender;

·the settlement with Cross River Investments (“CRI”) to issue 176,000 common shares related to the previous advance paid to complete the acquisition of ValidSoft; and

·the restructuring of the Company.

The substantial three phase restructuring plan (the “Plan”)shares of Company common stock into which (i) the outstanding indebtedness could be converted upon default and (ii) payments of interest could be made. We also agreed to increase the number of shares it was completed inrequired to reserve for issuance upon conversion of the third quarter 2016. The Plan which commenced inHigh Trail Note and to decrease the fourth quarterexercise price of 2015, was designedthe related warrant from $0.58 to align actual expenses and investments with current revenues as well as introduce new executive management.$0.37.

 

The first and second phaseBecause of the Plan encompassed fourth quarter 2015 through second quarter 2016. The third and final phaselimited nature of the Plan impacted third quarter 2016 results with a $0.6 millionrelief provided under the Forbearance Agreement, which does not lower the amounts payable in workforce reduction expenses primarily relatedprincipal or interest, the Company believes that it will not have sufficient resources to employee severances. Total workforce related restructuring charges to-date is $2.7 million including non-cash charges of $0.7 million.

The sale of ValidSoft atfund its operations and meet the end ofobligations specified in the third quarternote for the pricenext twelve months following the filing of $3.0 million was completedthis amended Annual Report. The Company’s software platforms require ongoing funding to continue the current development and operational plans and the Company received $2.0 millionhas a history of net losses. The Company will continue to expend substantial resources for the foreseeable future in cashconnection with the continued development of its software platforms. These expenditures will include costs associated with research and a $1.0 million promissory note. The $2.0 million in cash was used to pay downdevelopment activity, corporate administration, business development, and marketing and selling of the senior secured loan.Company’s services. In addition, other unanticipated costs may arise.

 

41

AlthoughAs a result, the Company has previously been ablebelieves that additional capital will be required to fund its operations and provide growth capital to meet the obligations under the High Trail Note. Accordingly, the Company will have to raise additional capital as needed,in one or more debt and/or equity offerings and continue to work with High Trail to cure the defaults. However, there can be no assurance that additional capital will be available at all, or if available, on reasonable terms. Further, the terms of such financing may be dilutive to our existing stockholders or otherwise on terms not favorable to us, or our existing stockholders. If we are unable to secure additional capital, and/or do not succeed in meeting our cash flow objectives or the Lender takes steps to call the loan before new capital is attracted, the Company will be materiallysuccessful in raising the necessary capital or that any such offering will be available to the Company on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital that may be needed and with acceptable terms, this would have a material adverse effect on the Company. Furthermore, the recent outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted world financial markets, has negatively impacted U.S. market conditions and we may havereduce opportunities for the Company to significantly reduce our operations. Asseek out additional funding. In particular, a decline in the market price of December 31, 2016, these eventsthe Company’s common stock, coupled with the stock’s delisting from the Nasdaq Capital Market, could make it more difficult to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that the Company deems appropriate. The factors discussed above raise substantial doubts aboutdoubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidatedconcern within one year after the date that the financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.are issued.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Dawson James Public Offering

 

On December 31,May 9, 2018, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with select accredited investors relating to a registered direct offering, issuance and sale of an aggregate of 2,440,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $2.50 per share for gross proceeds before deducting estimated offering expenses of approximately $6,100,000. The shares were issued pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2016, we had $931,189as amended October 21, 2016 and November 10, 2016 and declared effective November 14, 2016. Dawson James Securities, Inc. (the “Placement Agent”) acted as placement agent on a best-efforts basis in cash and cash equivalents. Based on our current expectationswith respect to our revenue and expenses, we expect that our current level of cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs forconnection with the next twelve months. If our revenues do not grow as expected and if we are not able to manage expenses sufficiently, including required paymentsoffering, pursuant to a placement agency agreement that was entered into on May 9, 2018. We also agreed to pay the Placement Agent a commission, to reimburse the Placement Agent’s out-of-pocket expenses, to issue the Placement Agent, in a private transaction, a warrant to purchase 122,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to 125% of the offering price per share, and to indemnify the Placement Agent against certain liabilities.

Artilium plc Acquisition

On October 1, 2018 we completed our previously announced Artilium plc (“Artilium”) Acquisition. In connection with the Artilium Acquisition, the Company issued an aggregate of 37,511,447 shares of the Company’s common stock to Artilium shareholders. At that time, the Company cancelled 3,200,332 shares of common stock that were held by Artilium pre-acquisition. Following the Artilium Acquisition, Artilium operates as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and Artilium’s direct subsidiaries operate as indirect subsidiaries of the Company, wholly owned by Artilium. Artilium is a software development company active in the enterprise communications and core telecommunications markets delivering software solutions which layer over disparate fixed, mobile and IP networks to enable the deployment of converged communications services and applications.

iPass Inc. Acquisition

On November 12, 2018, we entered into the iPass Merger Agreement by and among iPass Inc. (“iPass”), and TBR, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“TBR”). Pursuant to the iPass Merger Agreement, TBR commenced the iPass Offer for all of the outstanding shares of iPass’ common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, for 1.17 shares of the Company’s common stock, together with cash in lieu of any fractional shares, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes. The iPass offer and withdrawal rights expired at 5:00 p.m. New York City time on February 12, 2019, and promptly following such time TBR accepted for payment and promptly paid for all validly tendered iPass shares in accordance with the terms of the senior secured debt, we may be requirediPass Offer. In aggregate, the Company issued 9,867,041 shares of common stock to obtain additional equity or debt financian. In additiona, we currently have an S-3 registration statement filed with the SEC to potentially raise more capital.iPass shareholders in March 2019. iPass is a leading provider of global mobile connectivity, offering simple, secure, always-on Wi-Fi access on any mobile device.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pareteum Corporation and its subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). All intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company’s subsidiaries are:

 

·its wholly-owned subsidiary Elephant Talk Europe Holding B.V. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Elephant Talk Communications Italy S.R.L., Elephant Talk Business Services W.L.L., Guangzhou Elephant Talk Information Technology Limited, Elephant Talk Deutschland GmbH, Morodo Group Ltd. (dissolved May 10, 2016), and the majority owned (51%) subsidiaries Elephant Talk Communications PRS U.K. Limited and (51%) ET-UTS NV;

• its wholly owned subsidiary Pareteum North America Corp. with its wholly owned subsidiary, Pareteum UK Ltd.; 

·Elephant Talk Europe Holding B.V.’s wholly-owned subsidiary Elephant Talk Communication Holding AG and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Elephant Talk Communications S.L.U., Elephant Talk Mobile Services B.V., Elephant Talk Telekom GmbH, Elephant Talk Communication Carrier Services GmbH, Elephant Talk Communication Schweiz GmbH and the subsidiary Elephant Talk Communications Premium Rate Services Netherlands B.V.;

• its wholly owned subsidiary Pareteum Asia PTE. Ltd.; 

·Elephant Talk Telecomunicação do Brasil LTDA, is owned 90% by Elephant Talk Europe Holding B.V. and 10% by Elephant Talk Communication Holding AG;

• its wholly owned subsidiary TBR, Inc. (special purpose vehicle for iPass acquisition); 

·Elephant Talk Europe Holding B.V.’s majority (100%) owned subsidiary Elephant Talk Middle East & Africa (Holding) W.L.L., its wholly owned (100%) subsidiaries Elephant Talk Middle East & Africa (Holding) Jordan L.L.C., and its majority owned (99%) Elephant Talk Bahrain W.L.L.;

• its wholly-owned subsidiary Pareteum Europe B.V. (fka Elephant Talk Europe Holding B.V.) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Elephant Talk Mobile Services B.V., Elephant Talk PRS Netherlands BV, Elephant Talk Deutschland GmbH (dormant), Elephant Talk Middle East & Africa (Holding) W.L.L., Elephant Talk Luxembourg SA (dormant), Guangzhou Elephant Talk Information Technology Limited (dormant), Elephant Talk Communications Italy S.R.L. (dormant), Elephant Talk Business Services W.L.L., Elephant Talk Middle East & Africa (Holding) Jordan L.L.C. (dormant).; 

·its wholly-owned subsidiary Elephant Talk Limited (“ETL”) and its majority owned (50.54%) subsidiary Elephant Talk Middle East & Africa FZ-LLC.;

• its wholly owned Elephant Talk Communications Holding AG and its wholly owned subsidiaries Pareteum Spain SLU and ETC Carrier Services GmbH.; 

·its wholly-owned subsidiary Pareteum North America, Corp; and

• Pareteum Europe B.V. majority-owned subsidiaries Elephant Talk Bahrain W.L.L. (99%), ET de Mexico S.A.P.I. de C.V. (99.998%), ET-UTS NV; (51%) and LLC Pareteum (Russia) (50%) Elephant Talk; 

·Elephant Talk Europe Holding B.V.’s majority owned subsidiary (99.998%) ET de Mexico S.A.P.I. de C.V. and its majority owned subsidiary (99%) Asesores Profesionales ETAK S. de RL. de C.V.

• Elephant Talk Telecomunicação do Brasil LTDA, is owned 90% by Pareteum Europe B.V. and 10% by Elephant Talk Communication Holding AG; 

·PT Elephant Talk Indonesia is owned by Elephant Talk Europe Holding B.V.

• its wholly-owned subsidiary Elephant Talk Limited (“ETL”) and its wholly owned ET Guangdong Ltd. and its majority owned (50.54%) subsidiary Elephant Talk Middle East & Africa FZ-LLC.; 

• Asesores Profesionales ETAK S. de RL. de C.V. is owned 99% by Pareteum Europe B.V.; and 

• its wholly owned subsidiary Artilium Group Ltd. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Artilium NV, Speak UP BVBA, Ello Mobile BVBA, Artilium UK Ltd., Comsys Telecom & Media BV, Portalis BV, Comsys Connect GmbH, United Telecom N.V., Talking Sense BVBA, Wbase Comm. V, Artilium Trustee Company Limited, Comsys Connect BV, Livecom International BV, Comsys Connect AG and United Telecom BV.

 

42

Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

The functional currency is Euros forCompany’s consolidated financial statements were translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters (“ASC 830”). The majority of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary Elephant Talk Europe Holding B.V. and its subsidiaries. The financial statementsoperations are carried out in Euros. For all operations outside of the Company were translated to USD using period-end exchange rates as toUnited States, assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using the period end exchange rates and the average exchange rates as to revenues and expenses, and capital accounts were translated at their historical exchange rates when the capital transaction occurred. In accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters, net gains and losses resulting from translation of foreign currency financial statements are included in the statementStatement of changesChanges in stockholder’s equityStockholders’ Equity as otherOther comprehensive income (loss). Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in consolidated income/(loss),the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, under the line item ‘Other income/“Other income and (expense), net”.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements conforms with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. and requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.liabilities and intangible assets acquired in our acquisition of Artilium. Significant estimates include the bad debt allowance, revenue recognition, impairment of intangible assets and long-lived assets, valuation of financial instruments, realization of deferred tax assets, useful lives of long-lived assets and share-based compensation. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company has full access to the whole balance of cash and cash equivalents on a daily basis without any delay.

Financing Receivables

Financing receivables as As of December 31, 2016 is $0. The financing receivables reported as of December 31, 2015 relate to a timing difference between2018, the second closing of the Offering and the actual receipt of the related proceeds. The funds were in the process of being transferred from the escrow account kept by the placement agent and the company but were received on January 5,2016. The net financing receivable amounted to $272,425 as of December 31, 2015.Company had no cash equivalents.

 

Restricted Cash

 

Restricted cash as of December 31, 20162018 and 20152017, was $564,018$430,655 and $246,151$199,776 respectively and consists of cash deposited in blocked accounts as bank guarantees for national interconnection, wholesale agreements with telecom operatorscorporate credit cards and a bid offer guarantee(s). In the August 15, 2016 second amendmentportion of the 10% +Eurodollar 3rd Party Loan it was agreed that $500,000 was deposited into an escrow account under the sole dominion and control2018 balance relates to a Letter of the Chief Restructuring Officer.Credit issued to a vendor.

 

Accounts Receivables, Netnet

 

The Company’s customer base consists ofCompany has a geographically dispersed customer base. The Company maintains an allowance for potential credit losses on accounts receivable. The Company makes ongoing assumptions relating to the collectability of our accounts receivable. The accounts receivable amounts presented on our balance sheetsConsolidated Balance Sheets include reservesan allowance for accounts that might not be collected. In determining the amount of these reserves,the allowance, the Company considers its historical level of credit losses. The Company also makes judgments about the creditworthiness of significant customers based on ongoing credit evaluations, and the Company assesses current economic trends that might impact the level of credit losses in the future. The Company’s reservesallowances have generally been adequate to cover its actual credit losses. However, since the Company cannot reliably predict future changes in the financial stability of its customers, it cannot guarantee that its reservesallowances will continue to be adequate. If actual credit losses are significantly greater than the reserves, the Company would increase its general and administrative expenses and increase its reported net losses. Conversely, if actual credit losses are significantly less than our reserve,allowance, this would eventually decrease the Company’s general and administrative expenses and decrease its reported net losses. Allowances are recorded primarily on a specific identification basis. See Note 23 of the Financial Statements for more information.

 

43

Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries 

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Leasing Arrangements

 

At the inception of a lease covering equipment or real estate, the lease agreement is evaluated under the criteria ofASC 840, Leases. Leases meeting one of the four key criteria are accounted for as capital leases and all others are treated as operating leases. Under a capital lease, the discounted value of future lease payments becomes the basis for recognizing an asset and a borrowing, and lease payments are allocated between debt reduction and interest. For operating leases, payments are recorded as rent expense. Criteria for a capital lease include (i) transfer of ownership during the lease term; (ii) existence of a bargain purchase option under terms that make it likely to be exercised; (iii) a lease term equal to 75 percent or more of the economic life of the leased equipment; and (iv) minimum lease payments that equal or exceed 90 percent of the fair value of the property. Subsequent to initial recognition, the asset is accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable to that type of asset. The assets are amortized as per our accounting policy for property & equipment, and intangibles, as applicable.

 

Revenue Recognition and Net billings in excessExcess of revenuesRevenues

Revenue primarily represents amounts earned for our mobile and security solutions. Our mobile and security solutions are hosted software where the customer does not take possession of the software and are therefore accounted for as subscriptions. We also offer customer support and professional services related to implementing and supporting our suite of applications. Revenues generally are recognized net of any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.

 

Hosting subscriptions provide customers access to our software on a subscription basis, and support services (e.g. network operations and second line helpdesk) related to those arrangements. Hosting subscriptions for the use of our software generally include a usage-based license for which revenues are recognized commensurate with the customer utilization (for example, the number of mobile users on the network) commencing with the date our service is made available to customers and when all of the following conditions have been met: (i) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; (ii) delivery has occurred; (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability of the fee is reasonably assured.  Revenue is recorded as deferred revenue before all of the relevant criteria for revenue recognition are satisfied.

The Company enters into arrangements that include various combinations of hosting subscriptions and services, where elements are delivered over different periods of time. Such arrangements are accounted for in accordance with ASC 605-25 “Revenue605 Revenue Recognition-Multiple Element Arrangements.”Arrangements (“ASC 605”), as described in this section, for revenue recorded prior to the adoption of ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers which is discussed below. Revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements requires judgment to determine if multiple elements exist, whether elements can be accounted for as separate units of accounting, and if so, the fair value for each of the elements.

 

The elements in a multiple element arrangement are identified and are separated into separate units of accounting at the inception of the arrangement and revenue is recognized as each element is delivered. Delivered item or items are considered a separate unit of accounting when both of the following criteria are met: (i) the delivered item or items have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, meaning the delivered item or items have value on a standalone basis if it sold separately by any vendor or the customer could resell the delivered item or items on a stand-alone basis, and (ii) if the arrangement includes a general right of return related to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered item or items are considered probably and substantially in the control of the Company. Total consideration of a multiple-element arrangement is allocated to the separate units of accounting at the inception of the arrangement based on the relative selling price method using the hierarchy prescribed in ASC 605-25.605. In accordance with that hierarchy if vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value or, third-party evidence (TPE) does not exist for the element, then the best estimated selling price (BESP) is used. Since the Company does not have VSOE or TPE, the Company uses BESP to allocate consideration for all units of accounting in our hosting arrangements. In determining the BESP, the Company considers multiple factors which include, but are not limited to the following: (i) gross margin objectives and internal costs for services; (ii) pricing practices and market conditions; (iii) competitive landscape; and (iv) growth strategy.

 

In the paragraphs below we explain the revenue recognition policy for each element.

 

For the mobile solutions services the Company recognizes revenues from customers accessing our cloud-based application suite in two different service offerings, namely managed services and bundled services.

 

44

For managed services, revenues are recognized for network administration services provided to end users on behalf of Mobile Network Operators (MNO) and virtual Mobile Network Operators (MVNO’s). Managed service revenues are recognized monthly based on an average number of end-users managed and calculated on a pre-determined service fee per user. For bundled services, the Company provides both network administration as well as mobile airtime management services. Revenues for bundled services are recognized monthly based on an average number of end-users managed and mobile air time,air-time, calculated based on a pre-determined service fee. Technical services that meet the criteria to be separated as a separate unit of accounting are recognized as the services are performed. Services that do not meet the criteria to be accounted for as a separate unit of accounting are deferred and recognized ratably over the estimated customer relationship. Our arrangements with customers do not provide the customer with the right to take possession of the software supporting the cloud-based application service at any time.

 

Telecommunication revenues are recognized when delivery occurs based on a pre-determined rate and number of user minutes and calls that the Company has managed in a given month.

 

Professional services and other revenue include fees from consultation services to support the business process mapping, configuration, data migration, integration and training. Amounts that have been invoiced are recorded in accounts receivable and in net billings in excess of revenues or revenue, depending on whether the revenue recognition criteria have been met. Revenue for professional and consulting services in connection with an implementation or implantation of a new customer that is deemed not to have stand-alone value is recognized over the estimated customer relationship commencing when the subscription service is made available to the customer. Revenue from other professional services that provide added value such as new features or enhancements to the platform that are deemed to have standalone value to the customer are recognized when the feature is activated.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Adoption of ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers

On January 1, 2018, we adopted Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under Topic 605.

We recorded a net decrease to opening accumulated deficit of $107,520 as of January 1, 2018 due to the cumulative impact of adopting Topic 606, with the impact primarily related to our installation revenues that were previously deferred for which the performance obligation was determined to be complete as of the date of adoption. The impact of adopting Topic 606 as compared to revenue to be recognized under Topic 605 for the year ended December 31, 2018 was a reduction in reported revenues of $107,520, relating to the aforementioned installation revenues and an increase to the accumulated deficit.

Revenue Recognition under Topic 606

Our revenues represent amounts earned for our mobile and security solutions. Our solutions take many forms, but our revenue generally consists of fixed and/or variable charges for services delivered monthly under a combined services and SaaS model. We also offer discrete (one-time) services for implementation and for development of specific functionality to properly service our customers.

The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by revenue source:

  Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2018    
  (as restated)  2017 (1) 
Monthly Service $19,170,276  $12,540,377 
Installation and Software Development  1,087,329   1,007,130 
Total revenues $20,257,605  $13,547,507 

(1)As noted above, prior period amounts have not been adjusted under the modified retrospective method.

Monthly services revenues are recognized over time and installation and software development revenues are recognized over time.

The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by geography, based on the billing addresses of our customers:

  Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2018    
  (as restated)  2017 (1) 
Europe $18,752,751  $12,428,942 
Other geographic areas  1,504,854   1,118,565 
Total revenues $20,257,605  $13,547,507 

(1)As noted above, prior period amounts have not been adjusted under the modified retrospective method.

Monthly Service Revenues

The Company’s performance obligations in a monthly Software as a Service (SaaS) and service offerings are simultaneously received and consumed by the customer and therefore, are recognized over time. For recognition purposes, we do not unbundle such services into separate performance obligations. The Company typically bills its customer at the end of each month, with payment to be received shortly thereafter. The fees charged may include a combination of fixed and variable charges with the variable charges tied to the number of subscribers or some other measure of volume. Although the consideration may be variable, the volumes are estimable at the time of billing, with “true-up” adjustments occurring in the subsequent month. Such amounts have not been historically significant.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Installation and Software Development Revenues

The Company’s other revenues consist generally of installation and development projects.

Installation represents the activities necessary for a customer to obtain access and connectivity to the Company’s monthly SaaS and service offerings. While installation may require separate phases, it represents one promise within the context of the contract.

Development consists of programming and other services which adds new functionality to a customer’s existing or new service offerings. Each development project defines its milestones and will have its own performance obligation.

Revenue is recognized over time if the installation and development activities create an asset that has no alternative use for which the Company is entitled to receive payment for performance completed to date. If not, then revenue is not recognized until the applicable performance obligation is satisfied.

Arrangements with Multiple Performance Obligations

The Company’s contracts with customers may include multiple performance obligations. For such arrangements, the Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. The Company generally determines standalone selling prices based on the prices charged to customers.

Net Billings in Excess of Revenues

The Company records net billings in excess of revenues when payments are made in advance of our performance, including amounts which are refundable. Net billings in excess of revenues was $227,304 and $242,986 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Payment terms vary by the type and location of our customer and the products or services offered. The term between invoicing and when payment is due is not significant. For certain products or services and customer types, payment is required before the products or services are delivered to the customer.

Contract Assets

Given the nature of the Company’s services and contracts, it has no contract assets.

 

Cost of Revenues and Operating Expenses

 

Cost of ServiceRevenues

 

Cost of servicerevenues includes origination, termination, network and billing charges from telecommunications operators, costs of telecommunications service providers, supplies and materials, network costs, data center costs, facility cost of hosting network and equipment and cost in providing resale arrangements with long distance service providers, cost of leasing transmission facilities, international gateway switches for voice, data transmission services, and the Costcost of professional services of staff directly related to the generation of revenues, consisting primarily of employee-related costs associated with these services, including share-based expenses and the cost of subcontractors. Cost of servicerevenues excludes depreciation and amortization.

Research and Development Expense

Research and development expenditures are expensed in the period incurred, and these expenses are included within the operating expenses function Product Development.

Costs incurred during the application development stage of internal-use software projects, such as those used in the Company’s operations, are capitalized in accordance with the accounting guidance for costs of computer software developed for internal use in ASC 350-40. There are three main stages of computer software development. These stages are defined as (1) the preliminary project stage, (2) the application development stage, and (3) the post-implementation / operation stage. Only costs included in the application development stage are eligible for capitalization. Capitalization of costs begins once management authorizes and commits funding and the preliminary project stage is completed. Capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis. When assigning useful lives to internal-use software, the Company considers the effects of obsolescence, competition, technology, and other economic factors.

Product Development costs for the period ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $3,543,590 and $4,543,492, respectively. During the period ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company capitalized $990,076 and $4,142,089, respectively. As a result of the restructuring measures during 2016, that also impacted the development department, the Company decided to suspend project capitalization during the second half of 2016.

45

 

Reporting Segments

 

ASC 280, Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”), defines operating segments as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performances. The business operates as one single segment and discrete financial information is based on the whole, not segregated; and is used by the chief decision maker accordingly.

 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Financial Instruments

 

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes receivable, promissory notes (payable) and customer deposits approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature. The recorded values of long-term debt approximate their fair values, as interest approximates market rates. The Company’s conversion feature,unsecured convertible promissory notes, a derivative instrument, is recognized in the balance sheet at its fair values with changes in fair market value reported in earnings.

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

In accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”), the Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available.

 

Observable inputs are those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.

 

The fair value hierarchy is categorized into three levels based on the inputs as follows:

 

Level 1 – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.

 

Level 2 – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these financial instruments includeincludes cash instruments for which quoted prices are available but are traded less frequently, derivative instruments whose fair values have been derived using a model where inputs to the model are directly observable in the market and instruments that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.

 

Level 3 – Instruments that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These financial instruments are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

 

The degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for securitiesassets categorized in Level 3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls in its entirety is determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

 

The Company has threethe following asset groups that are valued at fair value categorized within Level 3: Derivative liabilities (recurring measurement), goodwillGoodwill and intangibles (non-recurring measurements) for the impairment test.test as well as for the Artilium acquisition. Below are discussions of the main assumptions used for the recurring measurements.

 

46

The Company used the Monte Carlo valuation model to determine the value of the outstanding warrants and conversion feature from the 2018 Offering (as defined below). Since the Monte Carlo valuation model requires special software and expertise to model the assumption to be used, the Company hired a third-party valuation expert. Because tradenames, customer relationships and the technology acquired as part of the acquisition of Artilium required expertise to model the assumptions to be used, the Company hired a third-party valuation expert.

 

Recurring Measurement - Warrant Derivative Liabilities and Conversion Feature Derivative (see also Note 1312 and 14)16)

 

Number of Outstanding Warrants and/or Convertible Notes

 

The number of outstanding warrants and/or convertible notes is adjusted every re-measurement date after deducting the exercise or conversion of any outstanding warrants convertible notes during the previous reporting period.

 

Stock Price at Valuation Date

 

The closing stock price at re-measurement date being the last available closing price of the reporting period taken from www.nasdaq.com.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Exercise Price

 

The exercise price is fixed and determined under the terms of the financing facility it was issued.

 

Remaining Term

 

The remaining term is calculated by using the contractual expiration dateestimated life of the 9% Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Noteoutstanding principal liability at the moment of re-measurement.re-measurement date.

 

Expected Volatility

 

Management estimates expected cumulative volatility giving consideration to the expected life of the note and/or warrants and calculated the annual volatility by using the continuously compounded return calculated by using the share closing prices of an equal number of days prior to the maturity date of the note (reference period). The annual volatility is used to determine the (cumulative) volatility of the Company´s common stock (= annual volatility * square root (expected life)).stock.

 

Liquidity Event

 

We estimate the expected liquidity event giving consideration toconsidering the average expectation of the timing of fundraises and the need for those funds offset against scheduled repayment dates and the costs and/or savings of the future steps in re-modelling the organization.

 

Risk-Free Interest Rate

 

Management estimates the risk-free interest rate using the “Daily Treasury Yield Curve Rates” from the US Treasury Department with a term equal to the reported rate or derived by using both spread in intermediate term and rates, up to the expected maturity date of the derivative involved.

 

Expected Dividend Yield

Management estimates the expected dividend yield by giving consideration to the Company´s current dividend policies as well as those anticipated in the future considering the Company´s current plans and projections.

Mandatory Conversion Condition

The Monte Carlo model includes Management currently does not believe that it is in the likelihood of meeting the condition in which the company will be able to call such mandatory conversion of outstanding convertible notes.

Mandatory Exercise Condition

The Monte Carlo model includes the likelihood of being able to force a mandatory exercisebest interest of the warrants priorCompany to the maturity of the warrant agreement.pay dividends at this time.

47

 

Share-based Compensation

 

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, (“ASC 718”). Under ASC 718, share-based awards are recorded at fair value as of the grant date and recognized as expense with an adjustment for forfeiture over the employee’s requisite service period (the vesting period, generally up to three years). The share-based compensation cost based on the grant date fair value is amortized over the period in which the related services are received.

 

For both contractors and advisory board members, we recognize the guidance for share-based compensation awards to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505-50 Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees (“ASC 505-50”). Under ASC 505-50, we determine the fair value of the options or share-based compensation awards granted as either the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.

To determine the value of our stock options at grant date under our employee stock option plan, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The use of this model requires the Company to make a number ofmany subjective assumptions. The following addresses each of these assumptions and describes our methodology for determining each assumption:

 

Expected Life

 

The expected life represents the period that the stock option awards are expected to be outstanding. The Company uses the simplified method for estimating the expected life of the option, by taking the average between time to vesting and the contract life of the award.

 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Expected Volatility

 

The Company estimates expected cumulative volatility giving consideration to the expected life of the option of the respective award, and the calculated annual volatility by using the continuously compounded return calculated by using the share closing prices of an equal number of days prior to the grant-date (reference period). The annual volatility is used to determine the (cumulative) volatility of its common stock (= annual volatility x square root (expected life)).stock.

 

Forfeiture rate

 

The Company is using the aggregate forfeiture rate. The aggregate forfeiture rate is the ratio of pre-vesting forfeitures over the awards granted (pre-vesting forfeitures/grants). The forfeiture discount (additional loss) is released into the profit and loss in the same period as the option vesting-date. The forfeiture rate is actualized every reporting period and due to the firm reorganization the forfeiture rate has been set to zero to reflect the current expectation of the number of leavers.

 

Risk-Free Interest Rate

 

The Company estimates the risk-free interest rate using the “Daily Treasury Yield Curve Rates” from the U.S. Treasury Department with a term equal to the reported rate or derived by using both spread in intermediate term and rates, to the expected life of the award.

 

Expected Dividend Yield

 

The Company estimates the expected dividend yield by giving consideration to our current dividend policies as well as those anticipated in the future considering our current plans and projections. The Company does not currently calculate a discount for any post-vesting restrictions to which our awards may be subject.

 

Income Taxes

 

Current tax is based on the income or loss from ordinary activities adjusted for items that are non-assessable or disallowable for income tax purpose and is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax assets are recognized for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from various sources such as tax losses and tax credit carry-forwards. Establishment of a valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that deferred taxes will not be fully realized.

 

In the ordinary course of a global business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Some of these uncertainties arise as a consequence of revenue sharing and reimbursement arrangements among related entities, the process of identifying itemsidentification of revenue and expenses that qualify for preferential tax treatment and segregationassessment of foreignthe sustainability of tax positions based on several factors including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, settled audit issues and domestic income and expense to avoid double taxation.new audit activity.

48

 

The Company files federal income tax returns in the US,U.S., various USU.S. state jurisdictions and various foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s income tax returns are open to examination by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, generally for 3 years but can be extended to 6 years under certain circumstances. In other jurisdictions the period for examinations dependdepends on local legislation.legislation, typically ranging from three to eight years. The Company’s policy is to record estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as part of its income tax provision.

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

Comprehensive income (loss) include all changes in equity during a period from non-owner sources. For the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, the Company’s comprehensive loss consisted of its net losslosses and foreign currency translation adjustments.

 

Business Combinations

 

The acquisition method of accounting for business combinations as per ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”), requires us to use significant estimates and assumptions, including fair value estimates, as of the business combination date and to refine those estimates as necessary during the measurement period (defined as the period, not to exceed one year, in which the Company may adjust the provisional amounts recognized for a business combination).

 

Under the acquisition method of accounting, the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interests acquired in the acquisition are recognized as of the closing date for purposes of determining fair value. The Company measures goodwill as of the acquisition date as the excess of consideration transferred, over the net of the acquisition date fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Costs that the Company incurs to complete the business combination such as investment banking, legal and other professional fees are not considered part of consideration and the Company charges them to general and administrative expense as they are incurred.

 

During the measurement period, the Company adjusts the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the measurement of the amounts recognized as of that date. Measurement period adjustments are reflected retrospectively in all periods being presented in the financial statements.

 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Goodwill

 

The Company records goodwill when the fair value of consideration transferred in a business combination exceeds the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill and other intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but the Company tests them for impairment annually during its fourth fiscal quarter and whenever an event or change in circumstances indicates that the carrying value of the asset is impaired.

 

The authoritative guidance for the goodwill impairment model includes a two-step process. First, it requires a comparison of the carrying value of the reporting unit to its fair value. If the fair value is determined to be less than the carrying value, a second step is performed. In the second step, the Company compares the implied fair value of goodwill to its carrying value in the reporting unit. The shortfall of the fair value below carrying value, if any, would represent the amount of goodwill impairment charge. We are using the criteria in ASU no. 2011-08 Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which permits the Company to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than the carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impairment test. If the Company concludes that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less that its carrying amount, it would not need to perform the two-step impairment test for that reporting unit.

 

49

The Company tests goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or sooner should there be an indicator of impairment as perASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other.Other (“ASC 350”). The Company periodically analyzes whether any such indicators of impairment exist. Such indicators include a sustained, significant decline in the Company’s stock price and market capitalization, a decline in the Company’s expected future cash flows, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, unanticipated competition, and/or slower growth rate, among others. In the Company’s case, the indicator is the continuing losses.

 

After the divestment of ValidSoft and renewed strategy the Company decided to impair the carrying value of goodwill related to ValidSoft. Following the restructuring and rationalization that commenced in the fourth quarter 2015 and continued during 2016 the Morodo and Telnicity related projects were cancelled and the related headcount phased out. As a result, the Company decided to fully impair the carrying value of goodwill related to Morodo and Telnicity.

Long-livedLong-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets

 

In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment charges. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives of the assets, between three and ten years. Other indefinite life intangible assets are reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 350, on an annual basis, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Measurement of any impairment loss for long-lived assets and amortizing intangible assets that management expects to hold and use is tested for impairment when amounts may not be recoverable. Impairment is measured based on the amount of the carrying value that exceeds the fair value of the asset.

 

Property and Equipment, Internal Use Software and Third Party Software

 

Property and equipment are initially recorded at cost. Additions and improvements are capitalized, while expenditures that do not enhance the assets or extend the useful life are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Included in property and equipment are certain costs related to the development of the Company’s internally developed software technology platform.

 

The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 350-40, Accounting for the Costs of ComputerInternal-Use Software developed or obtained for internal use,, and therefore the costs incurred in the preliminary stages of development are expensed as incurred. The Company capitalizes all costs related to software developed or obtained for internal use when management commits to funding the project; the preliminary project stage is completed and when technological feasibility is established. Software developed for internal use has generally been used to deliver hosted services to the Company’s customers. Technological feasibility is considered to have occurred upon completion of a detailed program design that has been confirmed by documenting the product specifications, or to the extent that a detailed program design is not pursued, upon completion of a working model that has been confirmed by testing to be consistent with the product design. Once a new functionality or improvement is released for operational use, the asset is moved from the property and equipment category “construction in progress” (“CIP”) to a property and equipment asset subject to depreciation in accordance with the principle described in the previous sentence. In thisaddition, account management also records equipment acquired from third parties, until it is ready for use. Capitalization of costs ceases when the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Depreciation is applied using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets once the assets are placed in service.

 

Management evaluates the useful lives of these assets on an annual basis and tests for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances occur that could impact the recoverability of these assets. In 2018 and 2017, the Company did not record an impairment.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This update outlines a new, single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. This new revenue recognition model provides a five-step analysis in determining when and how revenue is recognized. The new model will require revenue recognition to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration a company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. ASU 2014-09 is now effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. We adopted Topic 606 as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method. This update requires expanded disclosures relating to the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Additionally, qualitative and quantitative disclosures are required for customer contracts, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10).” ASU 2016-01 enhances the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information by addressing certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The amendments simplify certain requirements and also reduce diversity in current practice for other requirements. ASU 2016-01 is effective for public companies’ fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Except for the early application guidance specifically allowed in ASU 2016-01, early adoption is not permitted. The Company impaired $850,985adopted this standard on January 1, 2018 and there was no material effect as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-01 on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”). The updated guidance changes how companies account for assets heldcertain aspects of share-based payment awards to employees, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and used.statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The update to the standard was effective for the Company’s annual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 2017. The Company has evaluated the impact of ASU 2016-09 on its consolidated financial statements and has determined that the impact of adopting of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements, financial condition or results of operations.

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows - Restricted Cash a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force.” This standard requires restricted cash and cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows under the retrospective transition approach. The guidance became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has retrospectively adopted this standard and the effects of the adoption are reflected on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (ASU 2016-02), which together with subsequent amendments, modified lessee accounting guidance under Topic 840. This ASU requires the Company to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leases with terms of more than twelve months. This ASU also requires disclosures enabling the users of financial statements to understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. This new standard will become effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 (including interim reporting periods within those periods). Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company will adopt the new standard in the first quarter of its fiscal year 2019 using the optional transition method allowed by ASU 2018-11. The Company will elect not to reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, not to reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, not to reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases, and not to separate non-lease components from lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with that lease component as a single lease component for new or modified leases. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on its financial statements for existing leases as of January 1, 2019. However, as a result of the iPass acquisition, the Company expects to record a Right of Use asset and related liability for the existing iPass leases subject to ASU 2016-02.

 

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” (“ASU 2016-13”) which requires measurement and recognition of expected versus incurred credit losses for financial assets held. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company’s annual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted on January 1, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements; however, at the current time the Company doeshas not knowdetermined what impact the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements, financial condition or results of operations.

 

50


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”). The updated guidance changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payment awards to employees, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The update to the standard is effective for the Company’s annual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-09 on its consolidated financial statements; however at the current time the Company does not know what impact the adoption of ASU 2016-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements, financial condition or results of operations.NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net).” This update provides clarifying guidance regarding the application of ASU 2014-09 when another party, along with the reporting entity, is involved in providing a good or a serviceReclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to a customer. In these circumstances, an entity is required to determine whether the nature of its promise is to provide that good or serviceconform to the customer (that is, the entity is a principal) or to arrange for the good or service to be provided to the customer by the other party (that is, the entity is an agent). In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” which clarifies the identification of performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-11, “Revenue Recognition and Derivatives and Hedging: Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 Emerging Issues Task Force Meeting (“EITF”),” which rescinds SEC paragraphs pursuant to SEC staff announcements. These rescissions include changes to topics pertaining to accounting for shipping and handling fees and costs and accounting for consideration given by a vendor to a customer. In May 2016, the FASB also issued ASU No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,” which provides clarifying guidance in certain narrow areas and adds some practical expedients. The effective dates for these ASU’s are the same as the effective date for ASU No. 2014-09, for the Company’s annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of these ASU’s on its consolidated financial statements; however at the current time the Company does not know what impact the adoption of these ASU’s will have on its consolidated financial statements, financial condition or results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Management is currently assessing the impact of this pronouncement on the Company’s financial statements.presentation.

In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10).” ASU 2016-01 enhances the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information by addressing certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The amendments simplify certain requirements and also reduce diversity in current practice for other requirements. ASU 2016-01 is effective for public companies’ fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Except for the early application guidance specifically allowed in ASU 2016-01, early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of ASU 2016-01 on our consolidated financial statements and have not yet determined the method by which we will adopt the standard.

51

On April 7, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”, which requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability, similar to the presentation of debt discounts. ASU 2015-03 is effective for public companies’ fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for financial statement that have not been previously issued. The Company has elected for early adoption and included it in their Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01, Income Statement — Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items (“ASU 2015-01”). ASU 2015-01 eliminates the concept of extraordinary items from GAAP but retains the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently and expands the guidance to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply ASU 2015-01 prospectively. A reporting entity may also apply ASU 2015-01 retrospectively to all periods presented in the financial statements. We believe the adoption of ASU 2015-01 will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows - Restricted Cash a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force.” This standard requires restricted cash and cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows under the retrospective transition approach. The guidance will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. When adopted, the Company is expected to include restricted cash and cash equivalents with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of the cash flows.

 

Note 2.3. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

Accounts receivable are presented on the balance sheet net of estimated uncollectible amounts. The Company records an allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts in an amount approximating anticipated losses. Individual uncollectible accounts are written off against the allowance when collection of the individual accounts appears doubtful.  The Company recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $88,528$513,575 and $269,608$90,173 as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, respectively.

Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts are as follows:

Allowance for doubtful accounts Balance
at the
beginning
of the
period A
  Currency
revaluation
B
  Total
Allowance
for
doubtful
accounts
A+B
  Additions-
allowance
for
doubtful
accounts
  Release
for
doubtful
accounts
  Balance
at the end
of the
period
 
Year ended December 31, 2016 $269,608  $9,542  $260,066  $88,528   260,066  $88,528 
Year ended December 31, 2015 $-  $-  $-  $269,608  $-  $269,608 

 

Note 3.4. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets were recorded at $1,084,994amounted to $2,083,950 and $900,369 as of December 31, 2016, compared with $2,016,236 as of December 31, 2015.2018 and 2017, respectively. Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted primarily of prepaid insurance, other prepaid operating expenses, prepaid taxes and prepaid Value Added Tax (“VAT”).  As of December 31, 2016, $592,4452018, $424,167 of the prepaid expenses was related to VAT. On December 31, 2015,2017, prepaid VAT represented $621,286.$358,901.

 

Note 4.5. Other Assets

 

Other assets at December 31, 20162018 and December 31, 20152017, are long-term in nature and consist of long-term deposits certain R&D credits, and loans to third parties amounting to $129,037 and $473,893, respectively.

52

As of December 31, 2016, there was $129,037 in long-term deposits made to various telecom carriers during the course of operations and office facilities in various countries, compared with $285,404 as of December 31, 2015.loans amounting to $45,336 and $91,267, respectively. The deposits are refundable at the termination of the business relationship with the carriers. The primary decrease in long-term deposits was for $47,514 related to the divestment of ValidSoft, $18,585 termination of the Indonesian Office lease and $90,268 that was mainly related to the termination of carrier contracts.

  

Note 5. Note6. Notes Receivable

 

The third quarter 2016 sale of ValidSoft at the end of the third quarter for the price of $3.0 million$3,000,000 was completed and the Company received $2.0 million$2,000,000 in cash and a $1.0 million$1,000,000 promissory note. The Principal amount of $1,000,000 together with all interest mustwas originally required to be paid by on or before September 30, 2018 bearing interest of 5% per annum. During 20162017 we accrued $12,603$21,639 for interest.interest, credited $375,594 for Company liabilities assumed by ValidSoft and credited $51,525 as a partial repayment on the principal which results in a remaining outstanding principal amount of $594,520. On July 22, 2018, an agreement was made to extend the maturity date of the note to September 30, 2019. At December 31, 2018 we accrued $4,780 for interest which results in a remaining outstanding principal amount of $576,769.

In June 2020, the Company amended the promissory note with ValidSoft and entered into a Replacement Note in the amount of $512,380 which represented the outstanding principal and interest balance as of December 31, 2019. The amendment extended the maturity date of the promissory note to March 31, 2021. In connection with the amendment, ValidSoft agreed to pay $53,769 in overdue fees in two installments with the first installment of $26,885 paid at the time of the amendment and the remaining balance was paid in October 2020. The amendment also contains a provision for a discount if ValidSoft prepays any or all amounts outstanding prior to their scheduled due dates.

On November 26, 2018, the Company executed a senior secured promissory note from Yonder Media Mobile (“Yonder”), an unrelated entity, with interest accruing at a simple rate of 6% per annum with a maturity date of May 26, 2020. The principal amount is $500,000 and accumulated interest for 2018 was $5,667 which results in a remaining outstanding amount of $505,667. All principal and interest are due on the maturity date. In July 2020, the Company settled this promissory note, and subsequent notes entered into in 2019, by conversion of the amounts outstanding into shares of Yonder.

The total notes receivable held by the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, was $1,082,436 and $594,520, respectively.

 

Note 6.7.  Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment at December 31, 20162018 and December 31, 20152017 consisted of:

 

 Average     
 Estimated     
 Useful     
 Lives December 31, December 31, 
 Average
Estimated
Useful
Lives
 December
31, 2016
  December
31, 2015
  December
31, 2015
(assets held
for sale)
  December
31, 2015
(excl. Assets
held for sale)
  (in years)  2018 2017 
Furniture and fixtures 5 $155,197  $283,387  $29,605  $253,782  5 $168,453 $139,857 
Computer, communication and network equipment  3 – 10  19,079,117   22,991,043   63,216   22,927,827  3 - 10 21,008,928 17,020,421 
Software 5  3,209,318   5,906,917   2,255,695   3,651,222  5 5,310,767 2,899,794 
Automobiles 5  11,897   37,428   -   37,428  5 12,944 10,744 
Construction in progress for internal use software    786,897   1,299,993   395,585   904,408 
Software development 1  1,734,866  398,654 
Total property and equipment    23,242,426   30,518,768   2,744,101   27,774,667    28,235,958 20,469,470 
                         
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization    (14,533,648)  (15,496,091)  (772,799)  (14,723,292)    (22,792,183)  (15,755,760)
Total property and equipment, net   $8,708,778  $15,022,677  $1,971,302  $13,051,375    $5,443,775 $4,713,710 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Computers, communications and network equipment includes the capitalization of our systems engineering and software programming activities. Typically, these investments pertain to the Company’s:

 

·Intelligent Network (IN) platform;
·CRM provisioning Software;
·Mediation, Rating & Pricing engine;
·ValidSoft security software applications;
·Operations and business support software; and
·Network management tools.

Construction in progress (“CIP”) for internal use software consists of software projects in developments that have not been completed, and equipment acquired from third parties but not yet ready for service.

 

The total amount of product development costs (internal use software costs) that are capitalized in Property &and Equipment during the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 was $990,076$1,282,054 and $4,142,089,$661,605, respectively.

Upon completion of development, the assets are reclassified from CIP to the appropriate Property and Equipment category, at which point the assets begin to depreciate or amortize. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company transferred $214,770 from CIP into Property and Equipment. In 2015, we transferred $5,697,792 from CIP into Property and Equipment.Following the restructuring and rationalization that commenced in the fourth quarter of 2015 and continued during 2016 the Company cancelled projects and impaired for an amount of $850,985 in 2016.

53

Note 7. Intangible Assets

Intangible assets include customer contracts, telecommunication licenses and integrated, multi-country, centrally managed switch-based interconnects as well as ValidSoft Intellectual Property, including but not limited to software source codes, applications, customer list & pipeline, registration & licenses, patents and trademark/brands.

Intangible assets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following:

  Useful
Lives
 December 31,
2016
  December
31,
2015
  December
31,
2015
(assets held
for sale)
  December
31,
2015
(excl. 
Assets held
for sale)
 
Customer Contracts, Licenses, Interconnect & Technology 5 - 10 $315,610  $688,963  $-  $688,963 
ValidSoft IP & Technology 1 - 10  -   13,257,272   12,930,083   327,189 
Total intangible assets    315,610   13,946,235   12,930,083   1,016,152 
                   
Less: Accumulated Amortization    (315,610)  (430,333)  -   (430,333)
Less: Accumulated Amortization ValidSoft IP & Technology    -   (10,663,602)  (10,336,413)  (327,189 
Total intangible assets, Net   $-  $2,852,300  $2,593,670  $258,630 

 

During the yearyears ended December 31, 2016, intangible assets were fully amortized.2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company amortized $900,723 and $896,039 of software development, respectively.

 

Note 8. Long Lived Assets held for Sale

In 2015, the Company committed to a plan to sell the subsidiaries ValidSoft Ireland Ltd and ValidSoft UK Ltd. (jointly ‘ValidSoft’) within a time period of less than 12 months as of balance sheet date. Combined with other criteria as described in ASC 360-10-45-9 and ASC 360-10-45-11 we determined the long lived assets related to ValidSoft should be classified as held for sale as of the fourth quarter of 2015.

On September 30, 2016, ValidSoft was divested through a management buyout.

  Average      
  Estimated      
  Useful December 31,  December 31, 
Assets Held for Sale Lives 2016  2015 
Property & Equipment          
Furniture and fixtures 5 $-  $29,605 
Computer, communication and network equipment 3 – 10  -   63,216 
Software 5  -   2,255,695 
Automobiles 5  -   - 
Construction in progress for internal use software    -   395,585 
     -   2,744,101 
           
Less: accumulated depreciation    -   (772,799)
Total property and equipment, net   $-  $1,971,302 
           
Intangible Assets          
IP and Technology 3 – 10  -   12,930,083 
           
Less: accumulated amortization    -   (10,336,413)
Total intangible Assets, net   $-  $2,593,670 
           
Total Assets Held for Sale          
Property & Equipment and Intangible Assets    -   15,674,184 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization    -   (11,109,212)
Total Assets Held for Sale, net   $-  $4,564,972 

54

Note 9. Goodwill

The carrying value of the Company’s goodwill as of December 31, 2016 and as of December 31, 2015 was as follows:

Goodwill December 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
 
Goodwill ValidSoft Ltd $-  $2,659,866 
Goodwill Morodo Ltd.  -   177,155 
Goodwill Telnicity  -   190,401 
Total $-  $3,027,422 

After the divestment of ValidSoft and the renewed strategy the Company decided to impair the carrying value of goodwill related to ValidSoft. Following the restructuring and rationalization that commenced in the fourth quarter 2015 the Morodo and Telnicity related projects were cancelled and the related headcount phased out. As a result, the Company decided to fully impair the carrying value of goodwill related to Morodo and Telnicity.

Note 10. Accounts payable and Customer DepositsLong-Term Investments

 

As of December 31, 2016 and2018, the Company no longer held any long-term investments. The long-term investment held by the Company as of the year ended December 31, 2015, the accounts payable and customer deposits were comprised2017, of the following:

  December 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
 
Accounts payable $2,316,768  $2,574,425 
Customer deposits  -   65,438 
Total Accounts payable and Customer Deposits $2,316,768  $2,639,863 

The customer deposits in 2015 relate to Dutch MVNOs of$3,230,208 was Artilium common shares, which the relationship was terminated during 2016.Company now owns 100% of and our investment in our subsidiary is eliminated upon consolidation.

 

Note 11.9. Net Billings in Excess of Revenues

 

Because the Company recognizes revenue upon performance of services, net billings in excess of revenues represents amounts received from the customers for which either delivery has not occurred or against future sales of services. As of December 31, 2016,2018, the balance of short term net billings in excess of revenues was $951,791 and long term portion was $121,309, totaling $1,073,100.$227,304. For the corresponding period in 2015,2017, the short term net billings in excess of revenues balance was $1,259,545 and the long term portion was $1,066,687, totaling $2,326,232.$242,986.

 

Note 12.10. Accrued Expenses

 

As of December 31, 20162018 and December 31, 2015,2017, the accrued expenses were comprised of the following:

 

  December 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
 
Accrued selling, general and administrative expenses $4,955,959  $3,648,920 
Accrued cost of service  394,496   297,370 
Accrued taxes (including VAT)  127,434   708,002 
Accrued interest payable  132,632   199,104 
Other accrued expenses  403,099   178,316 
Total accrued expenses $6,013,620  $5,031,712 

Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

55

  December 31,  December 31, 
Accrued expenses and other payables 2018  2017 
Accrued selling, general and administrative expenses $1,188,875  $1,119,571 
Accrued salaries and bonuses  1,596,212   1,178,856 
Accrued employee benefits  -   1,165,373 
Accrued restructuring & acquisition related costs  1,885,194   - 
Accrued cost of service  812,945   413,942 
Accrued taxes (including VAT)  1,833,764   877,366 
Accrued interest payable  67,613   96,801 
Other accrued expenses  356,225   398,221 
  $7,740,828  $5,250,130 

 

Accrued taxes include income taxes payable as of December 31, 20162018, amounting to $9,442.$81,378. See Note 2421 of the Financial Statements for more information.

 

Accrued Selling, General and Administrative expenses include social security premiums, personnel related costs such as payroll taxes, provision for holiday allowance, accruals for marketing and sales expenses, and office related expenses.

 

Note 13.11. Promissory Notes and Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes

 

Promissory Notes

The Promissory Notes of $681,220 are 4 bank notes secured through by Artilium with varying original maturity dates ranging between 6 and 18 months with an average interest rate of 2%. The notes are not convertible and are not included in any of the tables in the remainder of this note 11.

9% Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes

The Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes can beare split into two groups,a long-term portion and a current portion, at December 31, 2018 only the breakdown is as follows and we recognize the following events during the last quarter.current portion exists.

 

Breakdown of the Unsecured Convertible Promissory
Notes (net of debt discounts)
 Outstanding 
December
31, 2016
  Closing(s)
during
2016
  Regular
Amortizations 
(during
2016)
  Conversions 
(during
2016)
including
accelerated 
amortization
  December
31, 2015
 
9% Unsecured Convertible Note (Private Offering Q4-2015 - Q1-2016) $(320,729) $(453,176) $(693,592) $1,064,868  $(238,829)
9% Saffelberg Note (Unsecured Convertible) $(500,319) $(472,656) $(27,662) $-  $- 
  $(821,048) $(925,832) $(721,254) $1,064,868  $(238,829)
Breakdown of the Unsecured Convertible
Promissory Notes (net of debt discounts)
 Outstanding
December
31, 2018
  Long Term
to Short
Term re-
allocation
  Regular
Amortizations
(during
2018)
  Conversions
(during
2018)
including
accelerated 
amortization
  Outstanding
December
31, 2017
 
9% Unsecured Convertible Note (Private Offering Q4-2015 – Q1-2016) $-  $40,967  $(59,340) $56,348  $(37,975)
9% Unsecured Convertible Note (Saffelberg)  -   -   (42,150)  622,023   (579,873)
Total Long-Term  -   40,967   (101,490)  678,371   (617,848)
                     
9% Unsecured Convertible Note (Private Offering Q4-2015 – Q1-2016)  (106,967  (40,967  -   -   (66,000)
Total Short Term  (106,967  (40,967  -   -   (66,000)
                     
Total Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes $(106,967) $-  $(101,491) $678,372  $(683,848)

 

On December 18, 2015, the Company consummated a closing (“Initial Closing”) and on March 14, 2016, the Company consummated the last of twelve closings of its private placement offering (the “Offering”) of Units (as defined below)units (“Units”) to “accredited investors” (as defined in Rule 501(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the “Securities Act”) (“Investors”). The closings have been part of a “best efforts” private placement offering of up to $4,200,000 (the “Maximum Amount”) consisting of up to 140 units (the “Units”),Units, each Unit consisting of: (i) one 9% unsecured subordinated convertible promissory noteNote in the principal amount of $30,000, (each a “Note” and collectively the “Notes”), which is convertible into shares (the “Note Shares”)the Note Shares of common stock of the Company $.00001 par value, (the “Common Stock”) at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $7.50 per share, subject to certain exceptions; and (ii) a five-year warrant (each a “Warrant” and collectively, the “Warrants”)Warrant to purchase one hundred thousand (4,000) shares of Common Stockcommon stock (the “Warrant Shares”) at an exercise price of $11.25 per share, subject to certain exceptions.

 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Units were offered and sold pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(2)4(a)(2) and Regulation D of the Securities Act. During 2016 and 2015, the Company sold an aggregate of $3,548,000 principal amount of Notes and delivered Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 473,067 shares of Common Stock.common stock.

 

The Warrants entitle the holders to purchase shares of Common Stockcommon stock reserved for issuance thereunder for a period of five years from the date of issuance and contain certain anti-dilution rights on terms specified in the Warrants. The Note Shares and Warrant Shares will be subject to full ratchet anti-dilution protection for the first 24 months following the issuance date and weighted average anti-dilution protection for the 12 months period after the first 24 months following the issuance date. In December 2016, the Company and the holders agreed upon modification of the Warrants to redeem the above anti-dilution protection and offered an exercise price adjustment to $3.75 and 10% bonus warrants in return.

 

The Company filed ana Registration Statement on Form S-3 registration statement registering the resale of the Note Shares and Warrant Shares of the Offering whichthat became effective November 14, 2016.

 

56

In connection with the Private Placement Offering,offering, the Company retained a registered FINRA broker dealer (the “Placement Agent”) to act as the placement agent. For acting as the placement agent, we agreed to pay the Placement Agent, subject to certain exceptions: (i) a cash fee equal to seven percent (7%) of the aggregate gross proceeds raised by the Placement Agent in the Offering,offering, (ii) a non-accountable expense allowance of up to one percent (1%) of the aggregate gross proceeds raised by the Placement Agent in the Offering,offering, and (iii) at the final Closingclosing one five-year warrant to purchase such number of shares equal to 7% of the shares underlying the Notes sold in this Offeringoffering at an exercise price of $7.50 and one five-year warrant to purchase such number of shares equal to 7% of the shares underlying the Warrants sold in this Offeringoffering at an exercise price of $11.25. The total number of warrants earned by the Placement Agent arewere 33,115 warrants with an exercise price of $11.25 and 33,115 warrants with an exercise price of $7.50.

 

The aggregate number of unitsUnits sold during the offering period in 2015 and 2016 resulted in a gross proceedproceeds of $3,458,000 and a net proceed of $3,039,932. The Company used the net proceeds from the Offeringoffering primarily for working capital.

 

The value of the warrantsWarrants and the conversion feature to the investors and the Placement Agent cash fees and warrants have been capitalized and off setoffset against the liability for the Notes. By doing this the Company followed the new ASU 2015-03 guidelines to also offset the debt issuance costs against the liability of the convertible notes. This resulted in a total initial debt discount of $2,395,290 and $467,568 of financing costs incurred in connection with the offering. The debt discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the term of the Notes using the effective interest method.

 

Breakdown of the 9% Unsecured Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note

Breakdown of the 9% Unsecured Subordinated Convertible
Promissory Note
            
(Maturing December
2018)
                  
  December
31, 2015
  Additional
Closings
(during 
2016)
  Regular
Amortizations
(during 
2016)
  Conversions
(during 2016)
including
accelerated 
amortization
  10% Early
Repayment
Short Term
  Outstanding
December
31, 2016
 
Convertible Note Principal Amount                        
Principal Amount (Long Term) $(1,275,000) $(2,273,000) $-  $2,823,000  $-  $(725,000)
10% Early Repayment (Short Term)  -   -   -   255,300   (354,800)  (99,500)
                         
Debt Discounts & Financing Costs                        
Investor Warrants  543,548   1,105,059   (346,454)  (1,062,843)  -   239,310 
Conversion Feature value  214,159   296,414   (133,988)  (302,669)  -   73,916 
7% Agent Warrants  86,593   144,158   (63,284)  (134,657)  -   32,810 
Financing Costs  191,871   274,193   (149,866)  (513,263)  354,800   157,735 
  $(238,829) $(453,176) $(693,592) $1,064,868  $-  $(320,729)

(Maturing December 2018 through March 21, 2019)

 

Breakdown of the 9% Saffelberg Note (Unsecured Convertible)       
(Maturing August 18, 2019)           
 December 31,
2015
  Closing during
2016
  Regular
Amortizations
(during 2016)
  Conversions
(during 2016)
including
accelerated 
amortization
  Outstanding
December 31,
 2016
  December
31, 2018
 Regular
Amortizations
(during 
2018)
 Conversions
(during 2018)
including
accelerated 
amortization
 Outstanding
December
31, 2017
 
Convertible Note Principal Amount                             
Principal Amount (Long Term) $-  $(723,900) $-  $-  $(723,900)
Principal Amount $(105,000) $- $60,000 $(165,000)
10% Early Repayment (10,500) - 6,000 (16,500)
         
Debt Discounts & Financing Costs                             
Investor Warrants  -   179,527   (19,294)  -   160,234  1,719 (26,104) (5,149) 32,972 
Conversion Feature value  -   71,717   (8,369)  -   63,348  1,237 (6,912) (1,412) 9,561 
7% Agent Warrants 534 (3,027) (609) 4,170 
Financing Costs  -   -   -   -   -   5,043  (23,297)  (2,482)  30,822 
 $-  $(472,656) $(27,662) $-  $(500,319) $(106,967) $(59,340) $56,348 $(103,975)

 

57

Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Breakdown of the 9% Saffelberg Note (Unsecured Convertible)

(Maturing August 18, 2019)

  December 31,
2018
  Regular
Amortizations
(during 2018)
  Conversions
(during 2018)
including
accelerated 
amortization
  Outstanding
December 31,
 2017
 
Convertible Note Principal Amount                
Principal Amount (Long-Term) $-  $-  $723,900  $(723,900)
Debt Discounts & Financing Costs                
Investor Warrants  -   (30,154)  (73,900)  104,054 
Conversion Feature value  -   (11,996)  (27,977)  39,973 
  $-  $(42,150) $622,023  $(579,873)

On June 29, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with Saffelberg Investments N.V. (“Saffelberg”)  agreeing to (i) pay the balance and interest of the September 7, 2017 repayment agreement, (ii) convert at $2.37 per share on July 11, 2018 the August 18, 2016 $723,900 convertible note and accrued interest into 387,913 common shares, (iii) adjust the strike price of the 96,250 warrants to a fixed amount of $2.37 on June 29, 2018 and (iv) register converted 387,913 common shares, the 96,250 warrant and other shares held by Saffelberg in the next registration statement.

Breakdown of the conversion rights for outstanding convertible notes:

Number of underlying shares for
Conversion of outstanding
unsecured convertible notes
 Outstanding
December 31,
2018
  Agreement
Amendments
/ Interest
effects
  Exercises /
Conversions
/
Expirations
  Outstanding
December 
31, 2017
 
9% Convertible Note - Investors  39,500   763   (22,292)  61,029 
9% Convertible Note - Other Investor  -   (472,030)  (387,913)  859,943 
Outstanding Conversion Features  39,500   (471,267)  (410,205)  920,972 

 

Note 14.12. Warrant and Conversion Feature Liabilities

 

The issuanceIn the past the Company used equity instruments to improve the yield of the 9% Convertible NoteNotes (Investors), the Saffelberg Note (Other Investor), the 13%+Eurodollar Senior Secured Credit Agreement (Lender) and Placement Agent Fees (Agent). During 2018, all resulted in rights to convert outstanding debt or exercise rights to buy common shares of the Company. Theoutstanding derivative liabilities have either been renegotiated or extinguished by other reasons.

Currently, the Company has identified the following movements during 2018 for the number of rights owned by the holders for the following groups.

 

Number of underlying shares for
Warrants & Conversion Feature issued
in relation with the 9% Unsecured
Subordinated  Convertible Promissory
Note(s)
 Outstanding
December 31,
2016
  Additional
closings during
2016
  Agreement
Amendments /
Shares issued
for Converted
Interest
  Exercises /
Conversions
  Outstanding
December 31,
2015
 
                
9% Convertible Note - Investors  212,667   303,067   748,973   (1,009,373)  170,000 
9% Convertible Note - Other Investor  134,679   134,679   -   -   - 
FMV Conversion Feature  347,346   437,746   748,973   (1,009,373)  170,000 
Lender Warrants  1,273,018   -   1,273,018   -   - 
Investor Warrants  520,374   303,067   47,307   -   170,000 
Other Investor Warrants  96,520   96,520   -   -   - 
7% Agent Warrants  66,229   42,429   -   -   23,800 
8% Agent Warrants  68,445   -   68,445   -   - 
FMV Warrant Liabilities  2,024,586   442,016   1,388,770   -   193,800 
                     
Total  2,371,932   879,762   2,137,743   (1,009,373)  363,800 
Number of underlying
shares for Liability
Warrants & Conversion
Features
 Outstanding
December 31,
2018
  Agreement
Amendments
/
Interest effects
  

Exercises/

Conversions
/
Expirations

  

Outstanding

December 31,
2017

 
9% Convertible Note - Other Investor  -   (472,030)  (387,913)  859,943 
Outstanding Liability Conversion Features  -   (472,030)  (387,913)  859,943 
                 
Other 9% Convertible Note Warrants  -   (96,520)  -   96,520 
Outstanding Liability Warrants  -   (96,520)  -   96,520 
                 
Total  -   (568,550)  (387,913)  956,463 

 

Most of them initially contained certain conditions which resulted in the obligation to account for those elements as Derivative Liabilities. The Company has identified the following derivatives in fair market value amountsfor such derivative liabilities of outstanding rights owned by the holders for the following groups.

 

58
Fair Market Value
Liability Warrants &
Conversion Features
 FMV as
of
December 
31, 2018
  Agreement
Amendments/
Conversions/
FX effect
  Mark to
market
adjustment
Ytd-2018
  FMV as
Of
December 
31, 2017
 
9% Convertible Note - Other Investor $-  $(1,706,484) $279,581  $1,426,903 
FMV Conversion Feature Liability  -   (1,706,484)  279,581   1,426,903 
                 
Other 9% Convertible Note Warrants  -   (204,896)  34,152   170,744 
FMV Warrant Liabilities  -   (204,896)  34,152   170,744 
                 
Total $-  $(1,911,380) $313,733  $1,597,647 

 


 

Fair Market Value Warrants &
Conversion Feature
 FMV as of
December
31, 2016
  Additional
closings
during
2016
  Agreement
Amendments/  
Conversions
  Mark to
market
adjustment
Ytd-2016
  FMV as 
of
December
31, 2015
 
                
9% Convertible Note - Investors $-  $296,413  $(1,675,439) $1,118,628  $260,398 
9% Convertible Note - Other Investor  438,448   71,717   -   366,731   - 
FMV Conversion Feature $438,448  $368,130  $(1,675,439) $1,485,359  $260,398 
Lender Warrants  3,362,284   769,861   (109,756)  2,702,178   - 
Investor Warrants  -   1,105,059   (919,760)  (776,772)  591,473 
Other Investor Warrants  188,214   179,527   -   8,687   - 
7% Agent Warrants  121,200   144,158   -   (116,705)  93,747 
8% Agent Warrants  155,684   -   142,232   13,452   - 
FMV Warrant Liabilities $3,827,382  $2,198,605  $(887,284) $1,830,840  $685,220 
                     
Total $4,265,830  $2,566,736  $(2,562,723) $3,316,199  $945,618 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

Note 15. 2016 13%+Eurodollar Senior Secured Credit Agreement fka the 2014 10%+Eurodollar Third Party Loan Agreement

The following table shows the composition of the 13%+Eurodollar Senior Secured Credit Agreement reflected as the 2014 10% + Eurodollar 3rd Party Loan in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:

2014 10% + Eurodollar 3rd Party Term Loan Agreement December 31,  December 31, 
(Extinguished due to the amendment in August 2016) 2016  2015 
2014 10% Term Loan (principal amount) $-  $6,500,000 
Debt Discount - Repayment Premium  -     
Deferred Exit Fee  -   57,176 
Deferred Financing Costs  -   (343,130)
Debt Discount - Original Issue Discount  -   (132,567)
Debt Discount – Warrant  -   (501,202)
  $-  $5,580,277 
         
2016 13% + Eurodollar Senior Secured Credit Agreement    
(Refinancing of 2014 10% + Eurodollar Loan)(Maturing December 2018,
including provisional extensions)
 December 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
 
2016 13% + Eurodollar Senior Secured Credit Agreement (principal) $10,081,836  $- 
Debt Discount - 10% Warrants & Free Warrant shares  (422,202)  - 
Debt Discount - Original Issue Discount  (6,596)  - 
Deferred Financing Costs  (164,731)  - 
Debt Discount - Repayment Premium  (1,772,645)  - 
  $7,715,662  $- 

59

On November 17, 2014, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a term loan credit agreement with Atalaya Administrative LLC, as the administrative agent and collateral agent, and the lenders party thereto (the “2014 10% Term Loan Agreement”). The 2014 10% Term Loan Agreement provides for a twelve million dollar term loan facility (the “Term Loan Facility”), with advances to be made on the Closing Date. Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility shall bear interest at the Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin per annum equal to ten percent (10.00%), such margin decreased by two percent (2%) from 12% upon the satisfaction of certain post-closing conditions. The Term Loan Facility will mature on December 31, 2017.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

On July 9, 2015June 29, 2018, the Company entered into a First Amendment toamended the Credit AgreementSaffelberg convertible note dated November 17, 2014August 18, 2016 with Corbin Mezzanine Fund I, L.P. (‘Lender’) and Atalaya Administrative LLC, as administrative agent and collateral agent for Corbin Mezzanine Fund I.

Leading up to the amendment of the credit agreement the Company paid $10,100,000 on June 22, 2015 to Atalaya, comprising of a $5,500,000 pre-payment, and a $4,427,333 payment in anticipation of the conclusion of the amended credit agreement, totaling $9,927,333 which amount was debited against the outstanding principal of $12,000,000, resulting in an outstanding balance at June 30, 2015 of $2,072,667. The remainder of$723,900 and amended the $10,100,000 was used for default interestAugust 18, 2016 Warrant. These amendments removed the elements that generated the derivative liabilities and prepayment charges. After closing of the First Amendment the Company received approximately $ 4.5 million from Atalaya/Corbin to bring the outstanding principal to the agreed $6,500,000.

As of the third quarter of 2015 the Company has been in breach of certain covenants under the amended credit agreement and is therefore in default of the credit agreement.

On August 15, 2016 the Company entered into the second amendment to the credit agreement dated November 17, 2014 with Corbin Mezzanine Fund I, L.P. and Atalaya Administrative LLC, as administrative agent and collateral agent for Corbin Mezzanine Fund I.  Under the second amendment, the senior secured lender increased the loan facility by $1,202,447 of which $1,000,000 was paid to the Company and the remainder was offset against legal fees and other financing related costs, the lender waived the Company’s existing defaults under the financial covenants, raised the applicable margin to 13% and reset the agreed maturity date to December 31, 2016 with extended maturity options towards March 31, 2017 if certain conditions were met. Furthermore the amendment included additional prepayment premium in the following cases, equal to: (a) twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount prepaid if such prepayment occurs on or before October 15, 2016, (b) fifty percent (50%) of the amount prepaid if such prepayment occurs on or after October 16, 2016 and on or before December 31, 2016, and (c) seventy-five percent (75%) of the amount prepaid if such prepayment occurs on or after December 31, 2016. Considering the above amendments the Company concluded that the amendments constitute an extinguishment of the debt compared to the terms before the amendment. As a result the outstanding debt discounts and deferred financing costs have been accounted as extinguishment of debt.

On December 27, 2016, the Company agreed upon another amendment (the “Amendment”) of the credit agreement with Atalaya Administrative LLC as administrative agent and Corbin Mezzanine Fund I, L.P. Pursuant to the Amendment, the Borrower is indebted in the amount of $5,562,778, and has agreed to add the following amounts to the indebtedness: (i) the Additional Prepayment Premium (as agreed upon in the Amendment of August 15, 2016) of $4,149,893; (ii) the Prepayment Premium (as defined in the Original Credit Agreement) of $69,165 and (iii) the Exit Fee (as defined in the Original Credit Agreement) of $300,000, totaling $10,081,836 (the “Amended Term Loan Facility”).

The Amendment removes certain terms regarding the liquidation preference and the prepayment fee. In addition, the Amendment provides that credit agreement shall bear interest at Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin per annum equal to thirteen percent (13%). However, upon receipt by the Company of Net Equity Proceeds (as defined in the Amendment) of $3,000,000 and applying such amount to certain obligations, the interest rate shall be reduced to 12% per annum.

60

Pursuant to the Amendment, the initial maturity date of the loan is June 30, 2017, which shall be automatically extended to December 31, 2017 (the “First Extended Maturity Date”) upon a repayment of principal of at least $1,500,000 million by March 31, 2017 and another $1,500,000 by June 30, 2017, and no default then exits. The First Extended Maturity Date shall be automatically extended to February 28, 2018 (the “Second Extended Maturity Date”) if the financial statements required by the Amendment for the month ending November 30, 2017 have been delivered to Atalaya and the Lender, and as of December 31, 2017, the total leverage ratio of the Company and its subsidiaries is less than or equal to 2.50 to 1.00, and no default then exits. The Second Extended maturity Date shall be automatically extended to December 31, 2018 (the “Third Extended Maturity Date”) if the financial statements for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2017 have been delivered to Atalaya and the Lender, and as of December 31, 2017, the total leverage ratio of the Company and its subsidiaries is less than or equal to 2.50 to 1.00, and no default then exits.

In addition, pursuant to the Amendment, the Borrower agrees to respectively repay $250,000 by the end of each fiscal quarter of 2017 and $500,000 by the end of each fiscal quarter of 2018. The Amendment also provides that the Borrower shall pay to Atalaya a quarterly installment of $15,000 as the administration fee, which is $60,000 in total. Also, the Amendment updated the financial covenants.

Also on December 27, 2016, a Reaffirmation Agreement (the “Reaffirmation Agreement”) was entered by and among ET Europe, the Company, Pareteum North America and Atalaya, pursuant to which, among other things, the Borrower reaffirmed its obligations to Lender under each of the Credit Agreement (as defined in the Reaffirmation Agreement), the Security Agreement (as defined in the Reaffirmation Agreement) and the Pledge Agreement (as defined in the Reaffirmation Agreement) and Deed of Pledge over Shares (as defined in the Reaffirmation Agreement).

Upon closing of the amendment, the Company performed an analysis to determine whether this amendment of the Credit Agreement constituted an extinguishment to the existing credit agreement and concluded that such was not the case.

Note 16. Registered Direct Offering and Warrant Liabilities

In June 11, 2013, the “Company” entered into an Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment to SPA”) to certain Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) dated June 3, 2013 with certain institutional and other investors (“DJ Investors”) placed by Dawson James Securities Inc. (the “Placement Agent”) and Mr. Steven van der Velden, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (“Affiliated Investors”), relating to a registered direct public offering by the Company (the “Offering”). The gross proceeds of this SPA were $12,000,000 and resulted in net proceeds of $11,292,500 after the deduction of $707,500 for fundraising related expenses to various parties involved. The majority of the net proceeds were used to pay off the outstanding Senior 8% Secured Convertible Notes issued in 2012.

The number of shares issued relating to this SPA amounted to 697,025, the number of warrants amounted to 313,661 and was covered by the registration statement filed in 2012 for an amount of $75,000,000 (S-3/A Amendment No. 2, File No. 333-181738 dated June 6, 2012).

According to ASC 480-10 Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the accounting for an equity instrument with detachable warrants classified as a liability reflects the notion that the consideration received upon issuance must be allocated between the instruments issued. Proceedsexpense from the issuance of an equity instrument with stock purchase warrants are allocated to the two elements based on the following: (i) the liability element has initially been recorded at fair market value;convertible note and (ii) the remaining portion of the consideration has been allocated to the equity element.warrant.

The liability instrument was re-evaluated at each reporting period with changes in the fair value recognized through the applicable period Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss.

During 2015 the last outstanding warrants relating to the Offering were exercised and exchanged in to common shares. Due to the conditions within the warrant agreement, there was no additional cash proceed when the exercise took place.

61

 

Note 17.13. Obligations under Capital Leases

 

The Company hashad a financing arrangement with one of its vendors to acquire equipment and licenses. This trade arrangement matured in January 2017.

The current portion of the Capital Leases of $10,813 as of December 31, 2016 is included in Current Liabilities “Obligations under capital leases (current portion)” in the accompanying balance sheet as of December 31, 2016.

 

Note 18.14. Other long termlong-term payable

 

Other long term payable is summarized as follows:

  December 31, 
  2016 
Arrangement with creditor $251,079 
Less:    
Short-term portion (recorded in Accrued Expenses and Other Payables)  (58,099)
Total long term $192,980 

During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company reached an agreement with regulatory authorities regarding a debt for telecom license fees from 2013. As of December 31, 20162018, the outstanding long term portionother long-term liabilities amounted to $192,980$212,703 compared to $260,290$151,163 as of December 31, 2015.2017, respectively.

Note 15. Related Party Loan

As of December 31, 2018, Pareteum BV has an outstanding loan to Comsystems (a company owned by Gerard Dorenbos). Prior to the acquisition by Pareteum, Gerard Dorenbos was a shareholder of Artilium PLC, with approximately 15% of the total shares of Artilium PLC, and a board member of Artilium PLC.

The loan has a maturity date of December 31, 2021. The total current amount long term and short term, of $251,079outstanding balance as of December 2016 will be repaid31, 2018 was $341,998 which carries an 8% interest rate and is reflected as a related party loan in 49 monthly installments.the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. All principal and interest are due on the maturity date.

 

Note 19.16. Fair Value Measurements

 

The following tables summarize fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2016In case the Company needs to account for financial assets andderivative liabilities, measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

  December 31, 2016 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
Derivative Liabilities                
Conversion feature $-  $-  $438,448  $438,448 
Warrant Liabilities  -   -   3,827,381   3,827,381 
Total Derivatives Liabilities $-  $-  $4,265,829  $4,265,829 

Thethe Company uses the Monte Carlo valuation model and the Black-Scholes model to determine the value of the outstanding warrants and conversion feature. Since the Monte Carlo valuation model requires special software and expertise to model the assumptions to be used,feature, in these situations, the Company hiredhires a third partythird-party valuation expert.expert to prepare such calculations.

 

The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at December 31, 20152017 for financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

 December 31, 2015  December 31, 2017 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
Derivative Liabilities                         
Conversion feature $-  $-  $260,398  $260,398  $- $- $1,426,903 $1,426,903 
Warrant Liabilities  -   -   685,220   685,220   -  -  170,744  170,744 
Total Derivatives Liabilities $-  $-  $945,618  $945,618  $- $- $1,597,647 $1,597,647 

 

The Company has classified the historical outstanding warrants into level 3 due to the fact that some inputs are not published and not easily comparable to industry peers.

 

62

Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The Company determines the “Fair Market Value” using a Monte Carlo or Black-Scholes model by using the following assumptions:

 

Number of outstanding warrants

 

The number of outstanding exercise rights is adjusted every re-measurement date after deducting the number of exercised rights during the previous reporting period.

 

Stock price at valuation date

 

The closing stock price at re-measurement date being the last available closing price of the reporting period taken from www.nasdaq.com.

 

Exercise Price

 

The exercise price is fixed and determined in the warrant agreement.

 

Remaining Term

 

The remaining term is calculated by using the contractual expiration date of the warrant agreement at the moment of re-measurement. The remaining term for a warrant exercise using the exchange condition is fixed in the warrant agreement at five years.

 

Expected Volatility

 

We estimate expected cumulative volatility giving consideration to the expected life of the note and calculated the annual volatility by using the continuously compounded return calculated by using the share closing prices of an equal number of days prior to the maturity date of the note (reference period). The annual volatility is used to determine the (cumulative) volatility of our common stock (= annual volatility x SQRT (expected life)).

 

Liquidity Event

 

We estimate the expected liquidity event giving consideration to the expectation of sale of assets held for sale and the current substantial reorganization.

 

Risk-Free Interest Rate

 

We estimate the risk-free interest rate using the “Daily Treasury Yield Curve Rates” from the U.S. Treasury Department with a term equal to the reported rate or derived by using both spread in intermediate term and rates, up to the maturity date of the note.

 

Expected Dividend Yield

 

We estimate the expected dividend yield by giving consideration to our current dividend policies as well as those anticipated in the future considering our current plans and projections.

 

Note 20.17. Stockholders’ Equity

 

(A) Common Stock

 

The Company is presently authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares Common Stock.of common stock. The Company had 8,376,26797,852,911 shares of common stock issued by the Company’s stock transfer agent and outstanding as of December 31, 2016,2018, an increase of 1,830,42951,235,818 shares from December 31, 2015, largely due2017, the increase has mainly been caused by the net issuance of shares relating to the acquisition of Artilium (37,511,447 shares issued less shares cancelled in connection with the conversionacquisition of $2,823,0003,200,332), warrant exercises (11,111,780), equity fund raises (2,453,400), non-cash compensation for board and management (2,279,688), note conversions (410,205), settlement of debt (375,857), consultants (234,553) and option exercises by staff (59,220). As of December 31, 2018 approximately 439,619 stock awards vested under the Company’s non-cash compensation plans and the shares are reflected on convertible notesthe Consolidated Statement Of Changes In Stockholders’ Equity/Deficit as outstanding at December 31, 2018 for which resulted in the issuance of a total of 1,009,373 shares; 176,000the shares were issued as part offrom the settlement with Cross River Initiatives; 104,671 shares were issued as executive officers and directors compensation including 20,000 shares being part of a severance and independent contractor agreement with one of the former officers of the company; 166,316 shares were issued as part of the negotiations to amend the credit agreement with the lender, divided into 120,000 shares issued as a result of warrants exercise and 46,315 shares issued as debt discount; 199,166 shares were issued as specialCompany’s stock awards to staff and consultants; 232,257 shares were issued as part of the agreement with suppliers to settle the outstanding debt or service fee in shares in lieu of cash; 33,427 shares were issued to consultants in lieu of cash.transfer agent are pending.

 

63


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

Reconciliation with Stock Transfer Agent Records:

The shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 according to the stock transfer agent’s records are 8,386,104. The difference in number of issued shares recognized by the Company of 8,376,267 amounts to 9,837 and it is the result of the exclusion of the 9,357 unreturned shares from ‘cancelled’ acquisitions (pre-2006) and 480 treasury shares issued under the former employee benefits plan.NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

(B) Preferred Stock

 

The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of 50,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $0.00001 par value per share. 249No shares of Preferred Stockpreferred stock are issued and outstanding as per closingof December 31, 2016.2018 and 2017. Under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, the Board of Directors has the power, without further action by the holders of the Common Stock,common stock, subject to the rules of the NYSE MKT LLC,Exchange, to designate the relative rights and preferences of the Preferred Stock,preferred stock, and issue the Preferred Stockpreferred stock in such one or more series as designated by the Board of Directors. The designation of rights and preferences could include preferences as to liquidation, redemption and conversion rights, voting rights, dividends or other preferences, any of which may be dilutive of the interest of the holders of the Common Stockcommon stock or the Preferred Stockpreferred stock of any other series. The issuance of Preferred Stockpreferred stock may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company without further stockholder action and may adversely affect the rights and powers, including voting rights, of the holders of Common Stock.common stock. In certain circumstances, the issuance of Preferred Stockpreferred stock could depress the market price of the Common Stock.

On September 2, 2016, the Company consummated a closing (a “Closing”) of its private placement offering (the “Offering”) of Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.00001 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), to “accredited investors” (as defined in Rule 501(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the “Securities Act”) (the “Investors”). At the Closing, the Company sold 73 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for aggregate gross proceeds of $730,000.

On September 16, 2016, the Company consummated a Closing of the Offering of the “Series A Preferred Stock, to Investors. At the Closing, the Company sold 49 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for aggregate gross proceeds of $490,000.

From September 28 through September 30, 2016, the Company consummated Closings of the Offering of Series A Preferred Stock, to Investors. At the Closings, the Company sold 27 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for aggregate gross proceeds of $270,000.

The above Closings are part of a “best efforts” private placement offering of up to $1,500,000 (the “Maximum Amount”) consisting of up to 150 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. 149 shares of Series A Preferred Stock have been sold by the Company for gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $1.49 million.

On October 28, 2016, the Company entered into separate subscription agreements with certain Investors relating to the issuance and sale of 33 shares of the Company’s Series A-1 Preferred Stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $330,000. 

On November 10, 2016, the Company entered into separate subscription agreements with certain Investors relating to the issuance and sale of 62 shares of the Company’s Series A-1 Preferred Stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $620,000. 

On December 2, 2016, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with an Investor relating to the issuance and sale of 5 shares of the Company’s Series A-1 Preferred Stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $50,000.

64

The above closings have been part of a “best efforts” private placement offering conducted by the Company of up to $1,000,000 (the “Maximum Amount”), consisting of up to 100 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock (the “Offering”). As of the date hereof the Company has sold a total of 100 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,000,000.

Each share of the Series A and Series A-1 Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, into 0.04% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock immediately prior to conversion. Combined the Series A (149) and Series A-1 (100) preferred shares will be convertible into 9.96% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock immediately prior to conversion.

The Company has the right, in its discretion, to compel holders of the Series A and Series A-1 Preferred Stock to convert the preferred stock into shares of the Company’s common stock in the event that a change in control (as defined in the Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of the Series A and Series A-1 Preferred Stock, or the “Certificate of Designation”) occurs within one year after issuance. Further, at any time after one year after the issuance, the Company has the option to automatically convert the Series A-1 Preferred Stock into common stock.

The holders of the Series A and Series A-1 Preferred Stock are not entitled to receive any dividends and have no voting rights (except that the Company may only take certain corporate actions with the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Series A and Series A-1 Preferred Stock). Further, upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holders of the Series A and Series A-1 Preferred Stock will receive distributions on par with and on a pro rata basis with the holders of the Company’s common stock as though the Series A and Series A-1 Preferred Stock had been converted at the time of such liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.

The Investors in the Offering have also received piggy-back registration rights with respect to the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A and Series A-1 Preferred Stock.

In connection with the Offering, the Company retained a placement agent. The Company agreed to pay the placement agent, subject to certain exceptions, a cash fee equal to eight percent (8%) of the aggregate gross proceeds raised by the placement agent in the Offering plus the reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket expenses not exceeding $15,000.

The Series A and Series A-1 Preferred Stock was offered and sold pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) and Regulation D of the Securities Act.

During 2016, the Company issued 249 shares of Preferred Stock, compared to 0 shares of Preferred Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2015.

 Outstanding as per December 31,
2016
  Outstanding as per December 31,
2015
 
Preferred A & A-1 shares Number  Net Proceeds  Number  Net Proceeds 
             
Series A Preferred Stock (Initial Value)  149  $1,490,000   -  $- 
Initial Fundraise Costs (Pref A)      (183,521)  -   - 
Series A-1 Preferred Stock (Initial Value)  100   1,000,000   -   - 
Initial Fundraise Costs (Pref A-1)      (163,283)  -   - 
                 
Total  249  $2,143,196   -  $- 

65

The Initial Fundraise Costs are a combination of the 8% Placement Agent fee, Finder fee, Legal fee, Solicitation fee and Costs relating to the repricing of certain outstanding warrants.

 

(C) Warrants

 

Throughout the years, the Company has issued warrants with varying terms and conditions related to multiple fundingfinancing rounds, acquisitions and other transactions. Often these warrants could be classified as equity instead of a derivative. As of December 31, 2016, 1,504,2782018, no warrants have been classified as derivative warrants compared to 96,520 warrants outstanding as per December 31, 2017 (see note 12) with a total fair market value of $3,827,381. A number of 700,373 have been classified as non-derivative warrants. $170,744.

The table below summarizes the warrants outstanding at(in share amounts) as of December 31, 2015 have been recorded2018 and classified as non-derivative warrants, except for 170,000 warrants which the Company has valued and recorded for an amount of $685,220 in the balance sheet forDecember 31, 2017:

Warrants:

Number of Warrants
(in shares)

Outstanding as of January 1, 20172,204,586
Issued25,696,801
Exercised(7,362,786)
Expirations(2,402,769)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2017  18,135,832
Issued  196,750
Exercised  (14,463,097)
Expirations  (80,003)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2018  3,789,482

Outstanding Warrants Exercise/
Conversion
price(s)
(range)
  Expiring  December
31, 2018
  December
31, 2017
 
Equity Warrants – Fundraising  $1.05 - $5.375   2019 - 2023   3,789,482   18,039,312 
Liability Warrants – Fundraising $0.8418   2019   -   96,520 
           3,789,482   18,135,832 

The discussion below describes the warrant liabilities issuedactivity (in shares) during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Warrants - Issued

On May 9, 2018, Pareteum Corporation, entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with select accredited investors relating to a registered direct offering, issuance and sale (the “2018 Offering”) of an aggregate of 2,440,000 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, $0.00001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), at a purchase price of $2.50 per share for total gross proceeds of $6,100,002, with related financing fees totaling $700,817.

Dawson James Securities, Inc. (the “Placement Agent”) acted as placement agent on a best-efforts basis in connection with the Unsecured Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note Offering, describedpursuant to a placement agency agreement (the “Placement Agreement”) that was entered into on May 9, 2018. We agreed to issue the Placement Agent, in Note 13 including warrantsa private transaction, a warrant to be issuedpurchase 122,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price ($3.125) equal to 125% of the placement agent. The Weighted Average Exercise Price for the currently outstanding warrants in the table below is $4.6075.offering price per share.

 

During December 2015On October 10, 2017, Pareteum Corporation closed on a public offering of common stock for gross proceeds of $1,569,750. The offering was a shelf takedown off of our registration statement on Form S-3 and first quarter of 2016, 66,229 warrants were issued as part of service provided bywas conducted pursuant to a placement agency agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into between us and Dawson James Securities, Inc., the placement agent for our offering of the 9% Unsecured Convertible Note, these warrants are containing conditions which classify these warrants ason a derivative liability.

On August 15, 2016, the Company amended the outstanding Credit Agreement, the 10%+Eurodollar 3rd Party Loan. As part of the amendment the Company exercised, free of charge, 166,316 warrants which were outstanding as per December 31, 2015. Additionally, the Company issued 1,273,018 warrants to the lenders, these warrants are containing conditions which make it necessary for the Company to account for those as being derivative warrants.

Also, the Company formalized and issued the $723,900 convertible note and 96,520 warrantsbest-efforts basis with respect to the initial agreementoffering (the “Placement Agent”), that was entered into on October 5, 2017. The Company sold 1,495,000 shares of common stock in the offering at a purchase price of $1.05 per share.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Dawson James Securities, Inc. (the “Placement Agent”) received as compensation for services rendered issued a warrant to settlepurchase 74,750 shares of Common Stock at the 2015 severance agreement withone five-year warrant to purchase such number of Shares equal to 5.0% of the former CEO which were assigned to Saffelberg Investments NV. These 96,520 warrants have also conditions which forcesShares sold in this Offering at an exercise price of $1.3125 (125% of the Company to account for these warrants as derivate warrants.price per Share).

Warrants – Exercised

 

During December 2016, the company engaged the placement agent also used for the issuance2018 several warrant holders decided to exercise, some of the convertibles notes offered in December 2015 and Q1 2016, to facilitate in the communication towards the note holders to persuade them to convert their notes, in combination with other incentives, in common shares. Their servicesexercises have been successful and the company committed to issue a variable number of warrants which have been determined to be 68,511 warrants as per closing December 31, 2016.

The below table summarizes the warrants outstandingmade “cashless” as per the below reporting:conditions stipulated in the agreement in certain situations. In total 14,463,097 warrants were exercised, resulting in 11,111,870 shares issued, 8,826,567 of them were exercised cashless resulting in no cash collection by the Company and 5,636,530 warrants were exercised at an average exercise price of $1.0847, with cash received of $6,114,083 during 2018.

 

Outstanding Warrants Exercise/ Conversion
price(s) (range)
 Expiring 2016  2015 
Equity Warrants - Fundraising $3.75 - $23.25 2016 - 2021  700,373   346,316 
Liability Warrants - Fundraising $3.25 - $11.25 2019 - 2021  1,504,278   170,000 
Equity Warrants - Other NA NA  -   746 
       2,204,651   517,062 

Warrants – Expirations

During 2018 warrants totaling 80,003 expired of which 80,000 were not exercised by the holder as the exercise price was higher than the actual share price on the stock market and another 3 warrants were eliminated due to rounding as a result of the reversed-stock-split

 

Note 21.18.  Non-controlling Interest

 

TheAs of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had no non-controlling interests in its subsidiaries.

Net losses attributable to non-controlling interests were insignificantsubsidiaries of zero dollars for all the years presented.both periods.

66

 

Note 22.19. Basic and diluted net loss per share

 

Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share (“ASC 260”). Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase Common Stock at the average market price during the period. The Company uses the ‘if converted’ method for its senior secured convertible notes. Weighted average number of shares used to compute basic and diluted loss per share is the same since the effect of dilutive securities is anti-dilutive.

 

The diluted share base for fiscal 20162018 and 20152017 excludes incremental shares related to convertible debt, warrants to purchase Common Stock, stock-based compensation shares waiting to be issued and employee awards and or stock options as follows:

 

Dilutive Securities 2016  2015  2018 2017 
Convertible Notes  212,667   170,000  39,500 920,972 
Warrants  2,204,651   517,062  3,789,482 18,135,832 
Shares “Pending to be issued” - 620,056 
Time Conditioned Share Awards 1,480,557 1,518,055 
Employee Stock Options  1,040,211   1,434,563   3,663,812  3,028,184 
  3,457,529   2,121,625   8,973,351  24,223,099 

 

These sharesDilutive securities were excluded due to their anti-dilutive effect on the loss per share recorded in each of the years presented. Except for shares pending to be issued due to compensation in lieu of cash and a certain warrant exercise, no additional securities were outstanding that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share.

 

Note 23. Option Compensation Plan and 2008 Long Term Incentive Compensation20. Employee Benefit Plan

 

2008 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan

 

In 2008, the Company adopted the 2008 Plan. The 2008 Plan initially authorized total awards of up to 200,000 shares of Common Stock, in the form of incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance units, restricted stock awards and performance bonuses. The amount of Common Stock underlying the awards to be granted remained the same after the 1-for-25 reverse stock-split that was effectuated on June 11, 2008.

 

InOn September 14, 2011, the stockholders approved an increase in the shares available under the 2008 Plan from 200,000 to 920,000 shares of Common Stock.

 


InPareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On December 17, 2013, the Company’s stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the 2008 Plan, which increased the number of authorized shares by 920,000 to 1,840,000 shares of Common Stock.

 

InOn September 12, 2014, the Company’s stockholders approved another amendment and restatement of the 2008 Plan, which increased the number of authorized shares by 400,000 shares.to 2,240,000 shares of Common Stock.

 

During 2016, 337,1592018, 120,529 shares were issued under the 2008 Plan, all of which 299,731 asthem being non-cash compensation and or bonus granted to senior staff, management and board members for services during the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first, second and third quarter of 2016,2018, no shares were issued under the plan as a result of employee option exercises.

 

67

During 2018, the board decided to revoke the outstanding options of 786,697, the staff involved was compensated with awards from the 2018 plan, another 138,246 options expired (post-vesting) and 175 options were forfeited (pre-vesting).

 

The current 2008 Plan is considered dormant and in principle only exists of historically granted options which are mostly far out of the money as per December 31, 2018 and will have little chance in being exercised, the outstanding number of options is 203,266 at an average exercise price of $10.74 ranging between $3.705 and $62.50.

 

Reconciliation of registered and available shares and/or options as of December 31, 2016:2018:

 

 Full Year 
2016
   Total  Full Year 
2018
 Total 
          
Registered 2008  -   200,000  - 200,000 
Registered 2011  -   720,000  - 720,000 
Approved increase 2013  -   920,000  - 920,000 
Approved increase 2014  -   400,000  -  400,000 
Total Registered under this plan      2,240,000 
Shares (issued to):        
Total Approved under this plan    2,240,000 
Less shares (issued to):     
Consultants  33,428   46,428  - 326,140 
Directors, Officers and staff  299,731   471,441  120,529 771,529 
Options exercised  -   95,284  - 95,284 
Options (movements):        
Issued and Outstanding      1,040,211 
Available for grant at December 31, 2016:      586,636 
Less options (movements):     
Revoked/Expired and Outstanding 925,118  203,266 
Available for grant at December 31, 2018:    843,781 

 

Common Stock options related to the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan consisted of the following as of the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015:2017:

Options: Number of
Options
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Initial Fair
Market Value
(Outstanding
Options)
 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016  1,040,211  $13.35  $8,836,640 
Granted in 2017  213,700   2.10   293,720 
Forfeitures (Pre-vesting)  15,024   3.72   (55,232)
Expirations (Post-vesting)  (140,551)  27.65   (2,220,933)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2017  1,128,384   9.40   6,854,195 
Revoked (cancelled) in 2018  (786,697)  6.33   (3,494,552)
Forfeitures (Pre-vesting)  (175)  3.07   (353)
Expirations (Post-vesting)  (138,246)  25.60   (1,996,852)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2018  203,266  $10.74  $1,362,438 

At December 31, 2018, the unrecognized expense portion of share-based awards granted to employees under the 2008 Plan was $0.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Options: Number of
Options
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Initial Fair
Market Value
(Outstanding
Options)
 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014  1,602,243  $33.00  $30,737,254 
Granted in 2015  613,186   14.25   4,635,518 
Exercised (with delivery of shares)  (347)  17.00   (2,451)
Forfeitures (Pre-vesting)  (527,825)  26.25   (9,425,694)
Expirations (Post-vesting)  (252,694)  43.50   (4,730,900)
Exchanged for Cashless exercise  -   -   - 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015  1,434,563   28.75   21,213,727 
Granted in 2016  498,218   3.75   1,368,955 
Exercised (with delivery of shares)  -   -   - 
Forfeitures (Pre-vesting)  (240,107)  16.75   (2,751,204)
Expirations (Post-vesting)  (652,463)  38.50   (10,994,838)
Exchanged for Cashless exercise  -   -   - 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016  1,040,211  $13.35  $8,836,640 

2017 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan

 

In 2016, options awarded had a weighted average exercise priceOn April 13, 2018, the Company filed an S-8 to register the issuance and sale of $3.75. The initial fair market valuethe remaining 3,000,000 shares of common stock of the 2017 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan which was previously ratified by our stockholders on September 12, 2017 at grant dateour annual meeting. This incentive plan provides for awards of these options,up to 6,500,000 shares of common stock, in the aggregate, was $1,368,955.form of options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights (“SAR’s”), performance units and performance bonuses to eligible employees and the grant of nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards, SAR’s and performance units to consultants and eligible directors.

 

The weighted average assumptions usedDuring 2018, 1,141,172 shares of common stock were issued to directors, officers and staff, 387,130 shares of common stock were issued to consultants for theservices provided and 59,220 were issued to staff for exercising options, furthermore 480,557 shares of common stock are currently reserved for time conditioned share awards for management (236,113) and board members (244,444) and 3,460,546 options were granted in 2016 using the Black-Scholes options model are: expected cumulative volatility of 214% based on calculated annual volatility of 85%, contractual life of 7.04 years, expected option life of 6.49 years (using the simplified method) and a Risk Free Interest Rate of 2.31%. The expected dividend yield is zero.are reserved for management, board members and staff.

 

Reconciliation of registered and available shares and/or rights as of December 31, 2018:Total
 68
Approved by the Shareholders6,500,000
Registered 2017 (S-8 dated June 14, 2017)3,500,000
Registered 2018 (S-8 dated April 13, 2018)3,000,000 

 

  Movement    
Less shares (issued to): 2018    
Consultants  387,130   507,281 
Directors, Officers and staff  1,141,172   2,640,410 
Options exercised  59,220   59,220 
Total Shares issued in 2018:      3,206,911 
         
Available for issuance at December 31, 2018 (under the S-8 registration statements)      3,293,089 
         
Less outstanding rights (movements):        
Options  1,560,746   3,460,546 
Time Conditioned Share Awards  (1,023,604)  480,557 
Available for grant at December 31, 2018: (approved by shareholders)      (648,014)

 

The Company plans on filing an additional S-8 registration statement for issuances that have been approved by shareholders, but still require registration. Due to administrative error, the Company issued options exercisable for 648,014 more shares of common stock than were approved under the 2017 Plan. Accordingly, the Company expects to amend the 2017 Plan and register the issuance of the excess shares with SEC prior to the exercise of such excess options.

Common Stock options related to the 2017 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan consisted of the following as of the years ended December 31, 2018:

Options:  Number of Options  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Initial Fair Market
Value
(Outstanding
Options)
 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016  -  $-  $- 
Granted in 2017  1,971,800   1.00   1,092,507 
Forfeitures (Pre-vesting)  (72,000)  1.00   (39,681)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2017  1,899,800   1.00   1,052,826 
Granted in 2018  1,999,685   2.51   3,356,202 
Exercised (with delivery of shares)  (59,220)  1.00   (59,220)
Forfeitures (Pre-vesting)  (374,663)  1.59   (792,724)
Expirations (Post-vesting)  (5,056)  1.00   (5,056)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2018  3,460,546  $1.81  $3,552,028 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Following is a summary of the status and assumptions used of options outstanding as of the years ended December 31, 2016,2018, and 2015:2017:

 

 Twelve month period ending:  Twelve months period ended 
 December 2016 December 2015  December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 
Grants        
Option Grants        
During the year  498,218   613,186   1,999,685   1,971,800 
Weighted Average Annual Volatility  85%  81%  130%  93%
Weighted Average Cumulative Volatility  214%  160%  216%  156%
Weighted Average Contractual Life of grants (Years)  7.04   4.42   4.07   3.99 
Weighted Average Expected Life of grants (Years)  6.49   3.97   2.79   2.84 
Weighted Average Risk Free Interest Rate  2.3105%  1.3513%  2.6928%  1.4906%
Dividend yield  0.0000%  0.0000%  0.0000%  0.0000%
Weighted Average Fair Value at Grant-date $2.75  $7.55  $1.678  $0.553 
                
Options Outstanding                
Total Options Outstanding  1,040,211   1,434,563   3,460,546   1,899,800 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  4.47   2.83   2.98   3.51 
Weighted Average Remaining Expected Life (Years)  4.92   2.31   1.84   2.35 
Weighted Average Exercise Price $13.35  $28.75  $1.81  $1.00 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (all options) $-  $- 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (only in-the-money options) $0  $52,500 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in-the-money options) $1,723,086  $2,032,786 
                
Options Exercisable                
Total Options Exercisable  643,153   866,457   841,053   - 
Weighted Average Exercise Price $17.86  $36.75  $1.00  $- 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  3.76   1.93   2.24   - 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (all options) $-  $- 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (only in-the-money options) $0  $- 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value $580,327  $- 
                
Unvested Options                
Total Unvested Options  397,058   568,106   2,619,493   1,899,800 
Weighted Average Exercise Price $6.04  $16.50  $2.06  $1.00 
Forfeiture rate used for this period ending (staff only)  0.000%  16.260%
Forfeiture rate used for this period ended  11.247%  3.651%
                
Options expected to vest                
Number of options expected to vest corrected by forfeiture  397,058   498,048   2,324,885   1,830,429 
Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense $1,802,691  $3,636,518  $2,448,790  $866,889 
Weighting Average remaining contract life (Years)  6.33   4.26   2.86   3.38 
                
Exercises                
Total shares delivered/issued  0   346   59,220   - 
Weighted Average Exercise Price $-  $17.00  $1.00  $- 
Intrinsic Value of Options Exercised $-  $1,052  $101,084  $- 

 

At December 31, 2016,2018, the unrecognized expense portion of the share-based option awards granted to management, directors and employees under the 20082017 Plan was approximately $1,802,691 with each stock-award,$1,985,465 adjusted for cancellations, forfeitures and returns. The forfeiture ratereturns during the preceding period.

2018 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan

On October 10, 2018, the Company filed an S-8 to register the issuance and sale of the remaining 8,000,000 shares of common stock of the 2018 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan which was adjusted from 16.3% as per closing December 2015previously ratified by our stockholders on September 12, 2017 at our annual meeting. This incentive plan provides for awards of up to 0% as per closing December 20168,000,000 shares of common stock, in the form of options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights (“SAR’s”), performance units and performance bonuses to eligible employees and the corresponding profitgrant of nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards, SAR’s and loss effect has been accounted forperformance units to consultants and eligible directors.

During 2018, 1,267,912 shares of common stock were issued to certain officers under the 2018 Plan. This is included in 2015.the accompanying consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) under vesting of restricted and common stock awards.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reconciliation of registered and available shares and/or rights as of December 31, 2018:Total
Approved by the Shareholders8,000,000
Registered 2018 (S-8 dated October 10, 2018)8,000,000

  Movement    
Less shares (issued to): 2018    
Consultants -  - 
Directors, Officers and staff  1,267,912   1,267,912 
Options exercised  -   - 
Total Shares issued:      1,267,912 
         
Available for issuance at December 31, 2018 (under the S-8 registration statement)      6,732,088 
         
Less outstanding rights (movements):        
Options  -   - 
Time Conditioned Share Awards  1,000,000   1,000,000 
Available for grant at December 31, 2018:      5,732,088 

The outstanding Time Conditioned Share Awards will be expensed at the fair market value on the date of grant. The current award will vest pro-rata during the 12 months of 2019.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

 

The Company recorded for the year ended December 31, 2016, $3,897,4372018, $6,782,759 of share-based compensation for both equity and liability classified awards, of which $3,654,369$120,000 relate to the 2008 Plan, $2,977,834 to the 2017 Plan, $3,249,999 relate to the 2018 Plan and $243,068$434,926 relates to the expensing of shares issued as restricted securities as defined in Rule 144 of the Securities Act and not issued under the 2008 Plan or 2017 Plan. For the comparable period in 20152017 the expensing was in total $3,481,908, $3,368,783$1,845,520 for shares issued under the 2008 Plan, $2,006,173 to the 2017 Plan and $113,125$437,340 for expensing of the issuance of restricted shares under the Rule 144 of the Securities Act. In case of grant of options, the Company utilized the Black-Scholes valuation model for estimating the fair value of the stock-options at grant and subsequent expensing until the moment of vesting.

 

69

Share-based Compensation Expense

 

 Twelve Twelve 
 months ended months ended 
Stock-Based Compensation Expense December 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
  Twelve
months ended
December 31,
2018
 Twelve
months ended
December 31,
2017
 
Consultancy services $243,068  $113,125  $536,686  $674,553 
Directors and Officers (shares and options)  2,275,068   2,266,704   5,141,213   3,070,520 
Employees (shares and options)  1,379,300   1,102,079   1,104,860   543,960 
Total $3,897,437  $3,481,908  $6,782,759  $4,289,033 

 

Note 24.21.  Income taxes

 

For financial statement purposes, loss before the income tax (benefit) provision is divided amongstgenerated by the following;

 

 2016 2015  2018 2017 
Domestic $(34,186,424) $(6,939,848) $(19,368,370) $(11,993,500)
Foreign  2,780,006   1,916,388   1,170,818   (362,274)
Total loss before income tax provision $(31,406,418) $(5,023,460) $(18,197,552) $(12,355,774)


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The Company files income tax returns in the USU.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The applicable statutory tax rates vary betweenfrom none (zero) andto 34%. However, because the Company and its subsidiaries have incurred annual corporate income tax losses since their inception, management has determined that it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of its US and foreign net deferred tax assets. Therefore, in all jurisdictions where the Company has a net deferred tax asset, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance to reduce the net carrying amount of the deferred taxestax assets to zero. The Company’s 2016 provision for2018 income taxestax benefit of $38,286$0.2 million relates to the benefit associated with the net losses in certain foreign jurisdictions offset by current taxes in other foreign jurisdictions with taxable income in some jurisdictions.income.

 

InThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the ordinary course of business,Act, was enacted on December 22, 2017, which reduced the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, among other changes. Effective in 2018, the Company is subject to global intangible low tax examinationsincome ("GILTI") which is a tax on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. Due to the jurisdictionscomplexity of the GILTI tax rules, companies are allowed to make an accounting policy choice of either (1) treating taxes due on future US inclusions in which it filestaxable income related to GILTI as a current-period expense incurred or (2) factoring such amounts into a company's measurement of deferred taxes. The Company is electing to treat taxes due on future US inclusions in taxable income related to GILTI as a current-period expense when incurred and, therefore, there is no impact to the deferred tax returns. The Company’s statute of limitations for tax examinations is four years for federal and state purposes and four to six yearsrate in the major foreign jurisdictions in which the company files.2018.

 

Income tax (benefit)/expense for each year is summarized as follows:

 

  December 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
 
Current:        
Federal $-  $- 
State  -   - 
Foreign  38,286   (17,225)
   38,286   (17,225)
Deferred:        
Federal  -   - 
State  -   - 
Foreign  -   - 
Income tax (benefit)/ expense $38,286  $(17,225)

70

  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 
Current:        
Federal $-  $- 
State  -   - 
Foreign  81,378   107,205 
   81,378   107,205 
Deferred:        
Federal  -   - 
State  -   - 
Foreign  (255,296)  - 
   (255,296)    
         
Income tax (benefit) expense $(173,918) $107,205 

 

The following is a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes at the US federal statutory rate (21%) and (34%) to the foreign income tax rate for the years ended:

 

 December 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
  December 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 
Tax expense (credit) at statutory rate federal  34%  34%
State tax expense net of federal tax  -   - 
Tax expense at statutory rate federal  21%  34%
Foreign income tax rate difference  (3)%  (7)%  -   (3)%
Transaction costs  (7)%  - 
Compensation  (6)%  - 
GILTI  (1)%  - 
Non-operating gain on stock acquisition  8%    
Change in valuation allowance  (33)%  (29.8)%  (15)%  (32)%
Other  0%  0%  1%  - 
Income tax (benefit)/ expense $(2)%  (2.8)%
  1%  (1)%

 

The tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, are as follows:

 

  2016  2015 
Deferred tax assets:        
Net Operating Losses $47,284,369  $41,191,934 
Total gross deferred tax assets  47,284,369   41,191,934 
Less: valuation allowance  (47,284,369)  (41,191,934)
Net deferred tax assets $-  $- 
  2018  2017 
Deferred tax attributable to:        
Net operating losses $31,927,996  $35,524,856 
Stock-based compensation expense  301,831   - 
Accrued liabilities and allowances  256,802   - 
Other  65,758   - 
Less: valuation allowance  (29,811,597)  (35,524,856)
Total deferred tax assets  2,740,790   - 
         
Deferred tax liabilities attributable to:        
Intangibles assets  (10,002,912)  - 
Deferred revenue  (1,123,626)  - 
Total deferred tax liabilities  (11,126,538)  - 
Net deferred tax liabilities $(8,385,748) $- 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of October 1, 2018, the Company acquired Artilium PLC, as a result of the purchase price allocation the company recorded a net deferred tax liability of $8.6 million for basis difference on acquired intangible assets and tax attributes from the business combination.

 

As of December 31, 2016,2018, and 2015,2017, the Company had significant net operating losses carryforwards of approximately $143$150 million and $157$109 million, respectively. TheAny net deferred tax assets in a jurisdiction have been offset by a full valuation allowance in 2016both 2018 and 20152017 due to the uncertainty of realizing any tax benefit for such losses. Releases of the valuation allowances in the future, if any, will be recognized through earnings.

 

As of December 31, 2016,2018, and 2015,2017, the Company’s US based subsidiaries had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards of approximately $80$64 million and $45$57 million, respectively. Federal and state net operating loss carry forwards in the US startstarted to expire in 2018. At December 31, 2016,2018, the net operating loss carryforwards for foreign countries amounts to approximately $63$86 million. Losses in material foreign jurisdictions will begin to expire in 2016.2018 and forward.

71

 

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code limits the use of net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards in certain situations where changes occur in the stock ownership of a company. In the event the Company has a change in ownership, utilization of the carry forward could be restricted.limited.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to tax examinations in the jurisdictions in which it files tax returns. The Company’s statute of limitations for assessment is three years for federal and three to four years for state purposes. The federal net operating loss carry forwards remain open for adjustment until the net operating losses are fully utilized. The Company's statute of limitations is four to six years in the major foreign jurisdictions in which the Company files.

 

The Company files income tax returns in the US federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. Due to the net operating loss, all the tax years are open for tax examination. As of December 31, 2016,2018 and 2015,2017, the Company accrued an ASC 740-10 tax reservea liability of $0 and $0,$246,370, respectively, for an uncertain tax (benefits)/liabilityposition, including interest and penalties. For the year ended December 31, 2018, there were no events that occurred that would cause the Company to record an uncertain tax position. The uncertain tax position from the prior year was resolved by either settlement with the tax authorities within the jurisdiction or payment resolution.

 

Note 25.22. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP, claimed legal fees.

On May 5, 2017, the Company’s former legal counsel, Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP, commenced litigation proceedings in New York alleging breach of contract and claiming $817,822 in unpaid legal fees for January 2015 through November 2016. On June 29, 2017, the parties entered into a settlement agreement for the full $817,822 with agreed-upon monthly installment payments through August 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2018, the amount outstanding on the settlement agreement is $365,815.

The Company is involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to our business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of such claims and lawsuits will not have a material effect on our financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.

telSPACE -vs-v. Elephant Talk et al.,AAA Case No. 01-16-0003-8242.

 

ClaimanttelSPACE, LLC (“Claimant”) commenced this AAA arbitration on or about September 7, 2016, by the filing of a statement of claim. ClaimanttelSPACE, LLC asserted claims arising out of Software Licensing Agreements (“Licensing Agreements”) entered into by Claimant and mCash Holdings LLC (together, “Licensors”), on the one hand, and Telnicity, LLC, on the other, which Telnicity subsequently assigned to the Company. Pursuant to the Licensing Agreements, the Company obtained the license to use certain intellectual property in exchange for monthly payments to the Licensors. Claimant alleged that the Company failed to make monthly payments from on or about November 2015, causing the Licensors to terminate the Licensing Agreements, and continued using Licensors’ intellectual property after such termination. Based on these allegations, Claimant asserted claims for breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secret, and copyright infringement. Claimant seeks unspecified damages, specific performance, prejudgment interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs.

 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On October 31, 2016, the Company filed a statement of answer denying Claimant’s claims. On January 5, 2017, the arbitration panel scheduled the hearing for April 13, 2017. The Parties have conducted limited discovery, which concluded on February 28, 2017. On March 10, 2017, Claimant requested leave to move for a default judgment against the Company for failing to advance the AAA administrative fees, and for sanctions based on alleged spoliation of evidence. On March 15, 2017, the Arbitration Chair denied Claimant’s request for leave to move for default and granted Claimant’s request for leave to move for sanctions.  The Arbitration will proceed

After a two-day arbitration hearing in Seattle, WA, the Arbitration tribunal, on April 13, 2017.or about June 9, 2017, issued an award for the benefit of Claimant in the amount of $510,916, inclusive of AAA tribunal and administrative fees (the “Award”). On or about July 25, 2017, the parties entered into a forbearance agreement, pursuant to which Claimant agreed to forbear from commencing any confirmation or enforcement proceedings and from taking any collection efforts or discovery related to the Award in exchange for the Company’s agreement to pay the Award in agreed-upon installment payments.

 

Saffelberg Investments N.V. unsecured $350,000 Promissory Note repaymentAll remaining payment obligations to telSPACE were settled by the Company in the year ended December 31, 2018 and is reflected in the financial statements. 

 

Following a mutually agreed extension of maturityArtilium Africa, LLC et al. v. Artilium, PLC et al

Artilium Africa, LLC et al. v. Artilium, PLC et al.; ICDR Case No. 01-19-0003-1680 and Artilium Africa, LLC and Tristar Africa Telecom, LLC v. Pareteum Corporation are related matters arising out of the Note from December 31, 2016,same dispute. The former matter is an arbitration filed with the International Center for Dispute Resolution on October 1, 2019 alleging that Artilium Group Limited, a subsidiary of Pareteum Corporation formerly known as Artilium PLC (“Artilium”), breached an Operating Agreement relating to March 31, 2017,a joint venture called Artilium Africa formed by Artilium Green Globe Services LLC and Tristar Africa Telecom, LLC (“Tristar”) to provide mobile data, cloud, and telecom services throughout Africa. The Claimants in the Company intendsICDR arbitration are seeking $30 million. The latter matter is a civil case filed on October 10, 2019 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The Plaintiffs in the Delaware case allege that Pareteum Corporation tortuously interfered with Tristar’s contract with Artilium in order to repay to Saffelbergenter into the unsecured $350,000 Promissory Note on or before the new maturity date.same type of agreement with Artilium. The Plaintiffs are seeking $150,000 in damages.

 

OtherSEC Subpoenas and other proceedings

 

The Audit Committee of the Company’s board of directors has conducted an internal investigation into the source of the accounting errors causing the restatement. As a result of this investigation, the Company has instituted, and will continue to implement and evaluate, additional remedial measures and internal controls to ensure that it has the right processes, people and discipline in place.

Sec Investigation. August 2019 and February 2020, the SEC issued the Company subpoenas requiring the production of documents related to, among other things, the Company’s recognition of revenue, practices with certain customers, and internal accounting controls. The SEC investigation is involvedongoing and the Company and the SEC staff are engaged in various claims and lawsuits incidental to our business.  In the opinion of management, the ultimatepreliminary discussions regarding a potential resolution of suchthe investigation. We express no opinion as to the outcome of this matter.

In re Pareteum Securities Litigation is the consolidation of various putative class actions that were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The court consolidated the actions on January 10, 2020 and named the Pareteum Shareholder Investor Group as the Lead Plaintiff. The Lead Plaintiff is asserting claims on behalf of purported purchasers and/or acquirers of Company securities between December 14, 2017 and lawsuits will not haveOctober 21, 2019. The defendants are the Company, Robert H. Turner, Edward O’Donnell, Victor Bozzo, Denis McCarthy, Dawson James Securities Inc., and Squar Milner (“Defendants”). The Lead Plaintiff alleges that Defendants caused the company to issue certain materially false or misleading statements in SEC filings and other public pronouncements in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. Lead Plaintiff seeks to recover compensatory damages with interest for itself and the other class members for all damages sustained as a material effectresult of Defendants’ alleged wrongdoing and reasonable costs and attorney’s fees incurred in the case.

Douglas Loskot v. Pareteum Corp. et al. is a putative class action that was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo, on our financial position, liquidity,May 29, 2020. It was brought on behalf of all former shareholders of iPass Inc. who received shares of Pareteum common stock pursuant to a February 12, 2019 exchange tender offer. The Complaint alleges that the defendants caused the Company to issue materially false or resultsmisleading statements in SEC filings submitted in connection with the tender offer in violation of operations.Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act.

 

72

Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Miller ex rel. Pareteum Corporation v. Victor Bozzo, et al. was filed on February 28, 2020 in the Supreme Court for the State of New York, New York County. It is a stockholder derivative suit brought by Plaintiff William Miller (“Plaintiff”), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, the Company, against certain officers and directors of Pareteum, including Victor Bozzo, Laura Thomas, Yves van Sante, Luis Jimenez-Tunon, Robert Lippert, Robert H. Turner, Edward O’Donnell, and Denis McCarthy (the “Individual Defendants”). Plaintiff alleges that the Individual Defendants caused the company to issue false or misleading statements in Securities Exchange Commission filings and other public pronouncements in violation of certain federal securities regulations. Plaintiff alleges that as a result of their misconduct, the Individual Defendants are liable for violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets. Plaintiff seeks a judgment awarding Pareteum damages with interest sustained as a result of the Individual Defendants’ alleged misconduct, directing the Individual Defendants to take certain measures to reform and improve Pareteum’s corporate governance and internal procedures, awarding Pareteum restitution from the Individual Defendants, and awarding Plaintiff all costs and expenses incurred in pursuing the claims.

Zhang ex rel. Pareteum Corporation v. Robert H. Turner, et al. was filed on May 26, 2020 in the Supreme Court for the State of New York, New York County. It is a stockholder derivative suit brought by Plaintiff Wei Zhang (“Plaintiff”), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, the Company, against certain officers and directors of Pareteum, including Robert H. Turner, Edward O’Donnell, Denis McCarthy, Victor Bozzo, Rob Mumby, Luis Jimenez-Tunon, Robert Lippert, Laura Thomas, and Yves van Sante (the “Individual Defendants”). Plaintiff alleges that the Individual Defendants caused the company to issue false or misleading statements in Securities Exchange Commission filings and other public pronouncements in violation of certain federal securities regulations. Plaintiff alleges that as a result of their misconduct, the Individual Defendants are liable for violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets. Plaintiff seeks a judgment awarding Pareteum damages with interest sustained as a result of the Individual Defendants’ alleged misconduct, directing the Individual Defendants to take certain measures to reform and improve Pareteum’s corporate governance and internal procedures, awarding Pareteum restitution from the Individual Defendants, and awarding Plaintiff all costs and expenses incurred in pursing the claim.

Shaw ex. rel. Pareteum Corporation v. Luis Jimenez-Tunon, et al. was filed on July 10, 2020 in the Supreme Court for the State of New York, New York County. It is a stockholder derivative suit brought by Plaintiff Michael Shaw (“Plaintiff”), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, the Company, against certain officers and directors of Pareteum, including Luis Jimenez-Tunon, Robert Lippert, Yves Van Sante, Robert H. Turner, Edward O’Donnell, Denis McCarthy, Victor Bozzo, and Laura Thomas (the “Individual Defendants”). Plaintiff alleges that the Individual Defendants caused the company to issue false or misleading statements in Securities Exchange Commission filings and other public pronouncements in violation of certain federal securities regulations. Plaintiff alleges that as a result of their misconduct, the Individual Defendants are liable for violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets. Plaintiff seeks a judgment awarding Pareteum damages sustained as a result of the Individual Defendants’ alleged misconduct, directing the Individual Defendants to take certain measures to reform and improve Pareteum’s corporate governance and internal procedures, and awarding Plaintiff all costs and expenses incurred in the Shaw Action.

In re Pareteum Corporation Stockholder Derivative Litigation (the “Delaware Derivative Action”) is a consolidated action the was originally filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and joins several related derivative actions. Specifically, on April 3, 2020, the District Court consolidated related suits brought by stockholders Edward Hayes, Juanita Silvera, and Brad Linton (“Plaintiffs”), derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, the Company, against certain officers and directors of Pareteum, including Robert H. Turner, Edward O’Donnell, Denis McCarthy, Laura Thomas, Victor Bozzo, Luis Jimenez-Tunon, Robert Lippert, Rob Mumby and Yves Van Sante (the “Individual Defendants”). Plaintiffs in the related actions have alleged that the Individual Defendants caused Pareteum to issue false or misleading statements in Securities Exchange Commission filings and other public pronouncements in violation of certain federal securities regulations. Plaintiffs allege that as a result of the Individual Defendants’ misconduct, they are liable for violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and gross mismanagement. Plaintiffs seek a judgment (1) declaring that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties and/or aided and abetted the breach of their fiduciary duties; (2) awarding Pareteum damages sustained as a result of the Individual Defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duty and violations of federal securities laws; (3) ordering that the Individual Defendants disgorge any performance-based compensation that was received during, or as a result of, the Individual Defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duty; (4) directing the Individual Defendants to take certain measures to reform and improve Pareteum’s corporate governance and internal procedures; (5) granting appropriate equitable or injunctive relief to remedy the Individual Defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duties and other violations of laws; (6) awarding Pareteum restitution from the Individual Defendants; and (7) awarding Plaintiff all costs and expenses incurred in the Related Suits and Delaware Derivative Action. On July 22, 2020, this action was transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Since that transfer, a docket has not yet been opened in the Southern District of New York and Plaintiffs have yet to file a complaint.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd. v. Pareteum Corp., et al., No. 19-cv-10460 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Section 11 Action”), is an action brought under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 by an investor, Sabby Volatility Master Fund, Ltd. (“Plaintiff”), against the Company, Robert H. Turner, Edward O’Donnell, Denis McCarthy, Victor Bozzo, Robert Lippert, Yves Van Sante, and Luis Jimenez Tunon (collectively, the “Defendants”). It was filed on Nov. 11, 2019. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants caused the company to issue false or misleading statements in a Registration Statement filed with the Securities Exchange Commission. As a result of the alleged misconduct, Plaintiff claims that Defendants are liable for violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act, breaches of a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) entered into between Plaintiff and Pareteum, and contractual indemnification allegedly owed to Plaintiff under the SPA. Plaintiff seeks monetary damages and/or rescission of the SPA, and indemnification by Pareteum for any losses resulting from its alleged breach of the SPA, including costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Section 11 Action.

Severance and Change of Control

Robert H. Turner - The employment agreement with Mr. Turner is for an indefinite term. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Turner is entitled to severance if Mr. Turner’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Turner for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the Employment Agreement) the Company will pay Mr. Turner, 12 months’ salary at the rate of his salary as of such termination, together with payment of the average earned bonuses (regular and extraordinary) since November 1, 2015.

Victor Bozzo – The employment agreement with Mr. Bozzo is for an indefinite term. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Bozzo is entitled to a severance if he is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Bozzo for “good reason” the Company will pay Mr. Bozzo 12 months’ salary at the rate of his salary as of such termination.

Edward O’Donnell – The employment agreement with Mr. O’Donnell is for an indefinite term. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. O’Donnell is entitled to a severance if he is terminated by the Company, then, subject to a mutual release, the Company will pay Mr. O’Donnell’s base salary for an additional 270 days after termination in accordance with customary payroll practices.

 

Note 26.23. Geographic Information

 

Year ended December 31, 2016

Year ended December 31, 2018         
  Europe  Other foreign
countries
  Total 
Revenues from unaffiliated customers $18,752,751  $1,504,854  $20,257,605 
Identifiable assets $153,471,150  $6,038,124  $159,509,274 

 

  Europe  Other foreign
countries
  Total 
Revenues from unaffiliated customers $11,953,015  $902,796  $12,855,811 
Identifiable assets $9,766,602  $3,278,687  $13,045,289 

Year ended December 31, 2015

Year ended December 31, 2017       
 Europe  Other foreign
countries
  Total  Europe Other foreign
countries
 Total 
Revenues from unaffiliated customers (restated) $13,034,020  $17,981,433  $31,015,453 
Revenues from unaffiliated customers $12,428,942  $1,118,565  $13,547,507 
Identifiable assets $22,269,243  $3,123,143  $25,392,386  $7,214,217  $18,111,816  $25,326,033 

 

Note 27.24. Concentrations

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist of accounts receivable and unbilled receivables. Those customers that comprised 10% or more of our revenue, accounts receivable and unbilled receivables are summarized as follows:

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, the Company had one customer that accounted for 82%64% of total revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, the Company had two customers that accounted for 50% and 33%96.9% of total revenue.

 

TheAs of December 31, 2018, the Company had one customer that accounted for 10% of accounts receivable including unbilled revenue. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had two customers that accounted for 81%49.7% and 16%23.9%, respectively, of accounts receivable andincluding unbilled revenue.

Note 25. Business Combinations

Acquisition of Artilium plc.  Artilium plc ("Artilium") is an innovative software development company active in the enterprise communications and core telecommunication markets delivering software solutions which layer over disparate fixed, mobile and IP networks to enable the deployment of converged communication services and applications.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In October 2017, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Artilium. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, Artilium agreed to issue and deliver to the Company an aggregate of 27,695,177 of its newly issued ordinary shares in exchange for 3,200,332 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $3,230,208 (the Company’s ownership was approximately 7%). The Company accounted for the Exchange Agreement as a cost method equity investment in the amount of $3,230,208.

On June 7, 2018, the Artilium Board and the Pareteum Board announced that they had reached agreement regarding the terms of a recommended share and cash offer by Pareteum to acquire the issued and to be issued ordinary share capital of Artilium not already owned by Pareteum. Under the terms of the acquisition, each Artilium shareholder was entitled to receive 0.1016 Pareteum shares and 1.9 pence in cash per Artilium share upon completion of the transaction. The acquisition valued each Artilium share at 19.55 pence and the entire issued and to be issued ordinary share capital of Artilium at approximately $104.7 million (or £78.0 million), based on Pareteum’s closing share price of $2.33 on June 6, 2018 and the exchange rate of US$1.3413: £1.

On September 13, 2018, shareholders of Pareteum approved the proposed acquisition of the entire issued and to be issued ordinary shares of Artilium.

On October 1, 2018, The Pareteum completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of Artilium. In connection with the acquisition, the Company issued an aggregate of 37,511,447 common shares of the Company’s stock which included 4,107,714 common shares issued to certain Artilium officers. The Company also paid 6,248,184 pounds or $8,142,009 in cash.

At the time of the acquisition, the Company remeasured its previously held equity investment in Artilium with a carrying value of $3,230,208 (3,200,332 shares) and recorded a gain on investment of $6,370,787 based on the Company’s stock price of $3.00 per share on October 1, 2018. The shares previously issued to Artilium were cancelled at the time of the acquisition. The acquisition-date fair value of the Company’s equity investment is included in the purchase consideration.

The allocation of the purchase price was as follows (in thousands):

Purchase consideration:   
Cash consideration $8,142 
Shares issued to shareholders’  112,535 
Fair value of previously held equity investment  9,601 
Purchase price allocation  130,278 
     
Purchase price allocation:    
Assets:    
Current and long-term assets (including cash and cash equivalents of $825)  4,726 
Intangible assets  40,800 
Total assets  45,526 
Liabilities:    
Current and long-term liabilities  7,982 
Deferred tax liabilities  8,641 
Total liabilities  16,623 
Estimated fair value of net assets acquired  28,903 
Goodwill $101,375 

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company’s consolidated financial statements included Artilium and its subsidiaries from the acquisition date of October 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The allocation of the purchase price for Artilium’s intangible assets were as follows (in thousands):

  Estimated
Fair
Value
  Useful
 Life
(Years)
 
Technology $20,600   6 
Customer relationships  16,800   18 
Tradename  3,400   5 
Intangible assets $40,800     

 

Note 28.26. Related Party Transactions

 

During 2018 and 2017, the Company retained Robert Turner of InTown Legal Services, who is the son of Robert H. Turner, Executive Chairman of the Board. InTown Legal Services has a $5,000 per month minimum retainer with the Company and was paid $133,194 in 2018 and $66,114 in 2017. The agreement between the Company and InTown Legal Services is an at will agreement.

There were no

As of December 31, 2018, Pareteum BV has an outstanding loan to Comsystems (a company owned by Gerard Dorenbos). Prior to the acquisition by Pareteum, Gerard Dorenbos was a shareholder of Artilium PLC, with approximately 15% of the total shares of Artilium PLC, and a board member of Artilium PLC.

The loan has a maturity date of December 31, 2021. The total amount outstanding as of December 31, 2018 was $341,998 which carries an 8% interest rate and is reflected as a related party transactionsloan in 2016 or 2015, exceptthe accompanying consolidated balance sheet. All principal and interest are due on the maturity date.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 27. Unaudited Quarterly Data (Restated)

Restatement information related to unaudited quarterly periods

The following tables present the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for (i) the salequarters in 2018. A summary of former subsidiary ValidSoft;the effects of the prior period errors, as described in Note 1. Restatement, on the consolidated financial statements are as follows:

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet at March 31, 2018

  As reported  Adjustments    As restated 
ASSETS              
Accounts receivable,net $1,954,495  $(912,607) AB $1,041,888 
Total current assets  19,096,882   (912,607)    18,184,275 
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET  4,176,199   1,322,278  BE  5,498,477 
Total assets $27,198,601  $409,671    $27,608,272 
LIABILITIES              
Accounts payable and customer deposits $2,286,345  $4,680  A $2,291,025 
Net billings in excess of revenues  316,040   (265,000) A  51,040 
Accrued expenses and other payables  4,841,163   (230,410) BE  4,610,753 
Total current liabilities  7,562,361   (490,730)    7,071,631 
Total liabilities  10,211,950   (490,730)    9,721,220 
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY              
Common stock  324,866,254   (724,814) BC  324,141,440 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (6,202,289)  1,206,271  AB  (4,996,018)
Accumulated deficit  (301,677,314)  418,944  ABCE  (301,258,370)
Total stockholders’ equity  16,986,651   900,401     17,887,052 
               
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $27,198,601  $409,671    $27,608,272 


Pareteum Corporation and (ii) the debt restructuring transactions with Atalaya Capital ManagementSubsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations and Corbin Mezzanine Fund I, L.P.Comprehensive Loss

Three Months ended March 31, 2018: As Reported  Adjustments    As Restated 
REVENUES $4,112,570  $(462,457)  A $3,650,113 
               
COST AND OPERATING EXPENSES              
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization)  1,194,523   4,986   A  1,199,509 
Product development  726,845   922   C  727,767 
Sales and marketing  688,998   15,156   C  704,154 
General and administrative  2,296,852   (467,305)  CE  1,829,547 
Total cost and operating expenses  5,946,108   (446,241)    5,499,867 
               
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (1,833,538)  (16,216)    (1,849,754)
               
OTHER INCOME (LOSS)  (300,981)  -     (300,981)
               
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (2,134,519)  (16,216)    (2,150,735)
Benefit for income taxes  (418)  -     (418)
NET LOSS  (2,134,101)  (16,216)    (2,150,317)
               
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME              
Foreign currency translation income  104,402   88,284   E  192,686 
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(2,029,699) $72,068    $(1,957,631)
               
Net loss per common share and equivalents - basic $(0.04)       $(0.04)
Net loss per common share and equivalents - diluted $(0.04)       $(0.04)


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows

Three Months ended March 31, 2018:           
  As Reported  Adjustments    As Restated 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES              
Net loss $(2,134,101) $(16,216)   $(2,150,317)
Adjustements to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities              
Stock based compensation  1,077,625   (487,819)  C  589,806 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities              
Decrease in accounts receivable  110,684   727,752   A  838,436 
Increase in accounts payable and customer deposits  307,619   4,679   A  312,298 
(Increase) decrease in net billings in excess of revenues  54,885   (265,000)  A  (210,115)
Decrease in accrued expenses and other payables  (383,139)  36,900   E  (346,239)
Net cash provided by operating activities  28,571   296     28,867 
               
Net cash used in investing activities  (433,749)  -     (433,749)
               
Net cash provided by financing activities  2,525,037   -     2,525,037 
               
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH  131,111   (296)    130,815 
NET INCREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH  2,250,970   -     2,250,970 
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD  13,737,675   -     13,737,675 
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, END OF PERIOD $15,988,645  $-    $15,988,645 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet at June 30, 2018

  As reported  Adjustments   As restated 
ASSETS             
Accounts receivable,net $3,852,866  $(2,508,400) AB$1,344,466 
Total current assets  24,461,818   (2,508,400)   21,953,418 
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET  4,680,006   977,834  BE 5,657,840 
Total assets $33,056,779  $(1,530,566)  $31,526,213 
LIABILITIES             
Accounts payable and customer deposits $2,568,505  $27,713  A$2,596,218 
Net billings in excess of revenues  258,904   207,047  A 465,951 
Accrued expenses and other payables  3,697,831   (232,583) ABE 3,465,248 
Total current liabilities  6,659,253   2,177    6,661,430 
Total liabilities  7,399,757   2,177    7,401,934 
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY             
Common stock  331,959,299   (447,055) BCD 331,512,244 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (6,281,426)  922,778  AB (5,358,648)
Accumulated deficit  (300,020,851)  (2,008,466) ABCDE (302,029,317)
Total stockholders’ equity  25,657,022   (1,532,743)   24,124,279 
              
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $33,056,779  $(1,530,566)  $31,526,213 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

Three Months ended June 30, 2018: As Reported  Adjustments   As Restated 
REVENUES $6,003,180  $(2,124,734) A$3,878,446 
              
COST AND OPERATING EXPENSES             
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization)  1,779,882   56,539  AC 1,836,421 
Product development  753,931   50,082  C 804,013 
Sales and marketing  652,442   156,793  C 809,235 
General and administrative  2,214,070   39,260  CDE 2,253,330 
Total cost and operating expenses  6,400,235   302,674    6,702,909 
              
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (397,055)  (2,427,408)   (2,824,463)
              
OTHER INCOME (LOSS)  2,072,361   -    2,072,361 
              
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  1,675,306   (2,427,408)   (752,102)
Provision for income taxes  18,842   2  E 18,844 
NET INCOME (LOSS)  1,656,464   (2,427,410)   (770,946)
              
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS             
Foreign currency translation loss  (79,137)  (283,493) E (362,630)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) $1,577,327  $(2,710,903)  $(1,133,576)
              
Net income(loss) per common share and equivalents - basic $0.03       $(0.01)
Net Income(loss) per common share and equivalents - diluted $0.03       $(0.01)


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

Six Months ended June 30, 2018: As Reported  Adjustments   As Restated 
REVENUES $10,115,750  $(2,587,191) A$7,528,559 
              
COST AND OPERATING EXPENSES             
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization)  2,974,405   61,525  AC 3,035,930 
Product development  1,480,776   51,002  C 1,531,778 
Sales and marketing  1,341,440   171,949  C 1,513,389 
General and administrative  4,510,922   (428,045) CDE 4,082,877 
Total cost and operating expenses  12,346,345   (143,569)   12,202,776 
              
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (2,230,595)  (2,443,622)   (4,674,217)
              
OTHER INCOME (LOSS)  1,771,378   1    1,771,379 
              
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (459,217)  (2,443,621)   (2,902,838)
Provision for income taxes  18,424   2   E 18,426 
NET LOSS  (477,641)  (2,443,623)   (2,921,264)
              
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)             
Foreign currency translation income (loss)  25,266   (195,210)  E (169,944)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(452,375) $(2,638,833)  $(3,091,208)
              
Net loss per common share and equivalents - basic $(0.01)      $(0.06)
Net loss per common share and equivalents - diluted $(0.01)      $(0.06)


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows

Six Months ended June 30, 2018:          
  As Reported  Adjustments   As Restated 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES             
Net loss $(477,641) $(2,443,623) A$(2,921,264)
Adjustements to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities             
Stock based compensation  1,771,580   (224,480) C 1,547,100 
Shares issued for services  86,778   31,594  D 118,372 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities             
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable  (1,851,046)  2,323,544  A 472,498 
Increase in accounts payable and customer deposits  606,393   27,873  A 634,266 
Increase in net billings in excess of revenues  22,627   207,046  A 229,673 
Decrease in accrued expenses and other payables  (1,508,005)  17,552  A (1,490,453)
Net cash used in operating activities  (952,476)  (60,494)   (1,012,970)
              
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,877,477)  -    (1,877,477)
              
Net cash provided by financing activities  8,484,428   -    8,484,428 
              
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH  42,185   60,494    102,679 
NET INCREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH  5,696,660   -    5,696,660 
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD  13,737,675   -    13,737,675 
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, END OF PERIOD $19,434,335  $-   $19,434,335 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet at September 30, 2018

  As reported  Adjustments     As restated 
ASSETS            
Accounts receivable,net $7,200,014  $(6,488,064)  AB  $711,950 
Total current assets  27,007,590   (6,488,064)      20,519,526 
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET  3,944,659   987,077   BE   4,931,736 
Total assets $34,809,219  $(5,500,987)     $29,308,232 
LIABILITIES                
Accounts payable and customer deposits $2,795,981  $261,692   A  $3,057,673 
Net billings in excess of revenues  122,906   (122,227)  A   679 
Accrued expenses and other payables  3,891,454   (268,567)  AB   3,622,887 
Total current liabilities  6,900,649   (129,102)      6,771,547 
Total liabilities  6,995,648   (129,102)      6,866,546 
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY                
Common stock  341,157,837   (1,739,749)  BCD   339,418,088 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (6,303,005)  906,665   AB   (5,396,340)
Accumulated deficit  (307,041,261)  (4,538,801)  ABCDE   (311,580,062)
Total stockholders’ equity  27,813,571   (5,371,885)      22,441,686 
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $34,809,219  $(5,500,987)     $29,308,232 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

Three Months ended September 30, 2018: As Reported  Adjustments     As Restated 
REVENUES $8,007,734  $(4,007,776)  A  $3,999,958 
                 
COST AND OPERATING EXPENSES                
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization)  2,128,683   150,600   AC   2,279,283 
Product development  765,723   (60,822)  C   704,901 
Sales and marketing  842,743   (150,891)  C   691,852 
General and administrative  8,127,982   (1,417,052)  ACDE   6,710,930 
Restructuring and acquisition costs  1,994,512   728   E   1,995,240 
Total cost and operating expenses  14,858,499   (1,477,437)      13,381,062 
                 
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (6,850,765)  (2,530,339)      (9,381,104)
                 
OTHER INCOME (LOSS)  (150,058)  -       (150,058)
                 
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (7,000,823)  (2,530,339)      (9,531,162)
Provision for income taxes  19,583   2       19,585 
NET LOSS  (7,020,406)  (2,530,341)      (9,550,747)
                 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS                
Foreign currency translation loss  (21,580)  (16,113)  E   (37,693)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(7,041,986) $(2,546,454)     $(9,588,440)
                 
Net loss per common share and equivalents - basic $(0.13)         $(0.16)
Net loss per common share and equivalents - diluted $(0.13)         $(0.16)


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

Nine Months ended September 30, 2018: As Reported  Adjustments     As Restated 
REVENUES $18,123,484  $(6,594,967)  A  $11,528,517 
                 
COST AND OPERATING EXPENSES                
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization)  5,103,088   212,125   AC   5,315,213 
Product development  2,246,499   (9,820)  C   2,236,679 
Sales and marketing  2,184,183   21,058   C   2,205,241 
General and administrative  12,638,904   (1,845,097)  ACDE   10,793,807 
Restructuring and acquisition costs  2,073,705   728   E   2,074,433 
Total cost and operating expenses  27,204,844   (1,621,006)      25,583,838 
                 
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (9,081,360)  (4,973,961)      (14,055,321)
                 
OTHER INCOME (LOSS)  1,621,319   2       1,621,321 
                 
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (7,460,041)  (4,973,959)      (12,434,000)
Provision for income taxes  38,007   4       38,011 
NET LOSS  (7,498,048)  (4,973,963)      (12,472,011)
                 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS                
Foreign currency translation income (loss)  3,686   (211,323)  E   (207,637)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(7,494,362) $(5,185,286)     $(12,679,648)
                 
Net loss per common share and equivalents - basic $(0.14)         $(0.23)
Net loss per common share and equivalents - diluted $(0.14)         $(0.23)


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows

Nine Months ended September 30, 2018:

  As Reported  Adjustments    As Restated 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES              
Net loss $(7,498,048) $(4,973,963) A $(12,472,011)
Adjustements to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities              
Stock based compensation  7,409,592   (1,625,380) C  5,784,212 
Shares issued for services  249,548   74,289  D  323,837 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities              
(Increase) decrease  in accounts receivable  (5,077,689)  6,303,208  A  1,225,519 
Increase in accounts payable and customer deposits  798,573   261,851  A  1,060,424 
Decrease in net billings in excess of revenues  (127,683)  (122,227) A  (249,910)
Decrease in accrued expenses and other payables  (1,421,435)  6,469  AE  (1,414,966)
Net cash used in operating activities  (3,823,929)  (75,753)    (3,899,682)
               
Net cash used in investing activities  (2,189,415)  -     (2,189,415)
               
Net cash provided by financing activities  11,089,560   -     11,089,560 
               
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH  50,461   75,753     126,214 
NET INCREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH  5,126,677   -     5,126,677 
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD  13,737,675   -     13,737,675 
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, END OF PERIOD $18,864,352  $-    $18,864,352 


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

Three Months ended December 31, 2018:

  As Reported  Adjustments    As Restated 
REVENUES $14,312,252  $(5,583,164) AE $8,729,088 
               
COST AND OPERATING EXPENSES              
Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation and amortization)  5,226,558   (487,741) A  4,738,817 
Sales and marketing  977,051   15,114  C  992,165 
General and administrative  5,170,008   1,365,348  ACDE  6,535,356 
Total cost and operating expenses  19,873,586   892,721     20,766,307 
               
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (5,561,334)  (6,475,885)    (12,037,219)
               
OTHER INCOME (LOSS)  (97,121)  6,370,788  EF  6,273,667 
               
LOSS BEFORE BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES  (5,658,455)  (105,097)    (5,763,552)
Income tax benefit  (181,847)  (30,082) E  (211,929)
NET LOSS  (5,476,608)  (75,015)    (5,551,623)
               
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME              
Foreign currency translation income  2,226   5,440  E  7,666 
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS $(5,474,382) $(69,575)   $(5,543,957)
               
Net loss per common share and equivalents - basic $(0.06)       $(0.06)
Net loss per common share and equivalents - diluted $(0.06)       $(0.06)


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 29.28. Subsequent Events

 

March 2017 Underwritten Common Stock OfferingiPass Inc. Acquisition

On March 10, 2017,February 12, 2019, Pareteum Corporation entered into the Consent with iPass SPV, and Fortress Credit Corp. (together with its affiliates, “Fortress”). Also, on February 12, 2019 the Company entered into the Joinder to Security Agreement, the Joinder to Guarantee and the Pledge Agreement, each for the benefit of or with Fortress, guaranteeing the Loan and granting a first-priority security interest in all of the assets of the Company to Fortress.

Pursuant to the Consent, Fortress consented to the consummation of the Merger Agreement by and among the Company, iPass Inc. (“iPass”) and TBR, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company paid Fortress a cash fee of $150,000 and issued to Fortress warrants to purchase an aggregate of 325,000 shares of common stock.

The Fortress loan to iPass bears an annual interest at a stated rate of 11.0% plus the greater of the following i) Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, ii) the Prime Rate, iii) the sum of the LIBOR in effect plus 1.0%, or iv) 2.0%. During the first 18 months following the closing date, payments under the Loan are interest-only, with iPass able to elect that up to 5.5% of the accrued interest to be paid in-kind by capitalizing and adding such interest to the unpaid principal amount. The Loan provides that beginning in November 2019, iPass shall make thirty monthly principal payments, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, and upon completion will fully payoff the Loan under the terms of the Agreement. At the end of the term or upon earlier prepayment by iPass, iPass will pay a fee equal to 5.0% of the principal of the term loan.

On November 12, 2018, the Company entered into an underwritingAgreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and among the Company, Purchaser, and iPass. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Purchaser commenced the Offer for the iPass Shares for the transaction consideration provided for under the Merger Agreement, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Prospectus/Offer to Exchange dated December 4, 2018 (together with any amendments and supplements thereto, the “Offer to Exchange”), and the related Letter of Transmittal. The Offer and withdrawal rights expired at 5:00 p.m. New York City time on February 12, 2019, and promptly following such time Purchaser accepted for payment and promptly paid for all validly tendered iPass Shares in accordance with the terms of the Offer.

On February 12, 2019, following acceptance and payment for the validly tendered iPass Shares and pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, the Company completed its acquisition of iPass from the stockholders of iPass when Purchaser merged with and into iPass, with iPass surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “iPass Merger”). The iPass Merger was governed by Section 251(h) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, as amended with no stockholder vote required to consummate the iPass Merger. At the effective time of the iPass Merger, each iPass Share outstanding was converted into the right to receive the iPass Merger consideration. The iPass Shares are no longer be listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market as a result of the transaction.

The consideration paid to stockholders of iPass by the Company was $30,654,194 which consisted of the issuance of 10,570,412 shares of its common stock at a stock price of $2.90 per share.

Devicescape Holdings, Inc.

On April 22, 2019, the Company, together with Devicescape Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Holdco” and together with the Company, the “Buyer”) entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Underwriting“Purchase Agreement”) with Joseph Gunnar & Co.Devicescape Software, Inc., LLC (the “Underwriter”a California corporation (“Devicescape”), relatingwhereby the Buyer acquired certain assets of Devicescape and assumed certain liabilities of Devicescape, such that Holdco shall continue as a surviving subsidiary of the Company holding the acquired assets and assuming those certain liabilities of Devicescape (the “Devicescape Purchase”). In connection with the Devicescape Purchase, and pursuant to the issuanceterms and salesubject to the conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, the Company paid cash consideration of 2,333,334$2,000,000 and issued to the stockholders of Devicescape an aggregate of 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock parat a value $0.00001of $1,692,000 based on our closing price on April 22, 2019, of $4.23 per share.

Post Road Group Debt Facility

On February 26, 2019, Pareteum Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Post Road Administrative Finance, LLC and its affiliate Post Road Special Opportunity Fund I LLP (collectively, “Post Road”). Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, Post Road will provide the Company with a secured loan of up to $50,000,000 (the “Loan”), with an initial loan of $25,000,000 funded on February 26, 2019, and additional loans in increments of $5,000,000 as requested by the Company before the 18 month anniversary of the initial funding date. No additional loan shall be funded until the later of delivery of certain third party consents (the “Consents”), the filing of Pareteum’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2019, or June 1, 2019. All amounts owed under the Credit Agreement shall be due on February 26, 2022.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The unpaid principal amount of the Loan shall bear interest from the relevant funding dates at a rate per year of 8.5% plus Libor in effect from time to time, provided however, that upon an event of default or if certain of the Consents are not delivered prior to May 1, 2019 or June 1, 2019, as applicable, the unpaid principal amount of the Loan shall bear interest from the relevant funding dates at a rate per year of 11.5% plus Libor in effect from time to time until the Consents are delivered. The interest shall be due and payable monthly in cash in arrears, provided, however, that the Company may elect to pay any or all of the interest in the form of PIK interest due and payable at maturity at a maximum percentage per year equal to (a) through and including the first anniversary of the initial funding date, 3%, (b) after the first anniversary of the initial funding date through and including the second anniversary of the initial funding date, 2%, and (c) after the second anniversary of the initial funding date, 1%.

Permitted use of proceeds for the initial $25,000,000 of the Loan include approximately $11,000,000 for payment in full of outstanding secured debt owed to Fortress Credit Corp. (together with its affiliates, “Fortress”) incurred in connection with the Company’s previously disclosed acquisition of iPass Inc. (“iPass”) on February 12, 2019, as well as remaining amounts for permitted acquisitions and investments, for general working capital purposes and to pay approximately $885,000 in transaction fees related to the Loan. Proceeds from additional Loans, if any, are to be used for permitted acquisitions and to fund growth capital expenditures and other growth initiatives.

The Loan is subject to prepayment upon the receipt of proceeds outside the ordinary course of business in excess of $1,000,000 and the Company must pay a commitment fee of 1% per year for an unfunded commitment. The initial $25,000,000 loan is reduced by an original issue discount of (i) 0.75% of $25,000,000 and (ii) 1.25% of $50,000,000, and any additional loans will be reduced by an original issue discount of 0.75% of the funded amounts.

The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by a first-priority security interest in all of the assets of the Company and guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of the Company. The Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and indemnification provisions. The Credit Agreement also contains affirmative and negative covenants with respect to operation of the business and properties of the Company as well as financial performance, including requirements to maintain a minimum of $2,000,000 of unrestricted cash, certain maximum total leverage ratios, a debt to asset ratio, maximum churn rate and minimum adjusted EBITDA. The Credit Agreement further provides customary events of default and cure periods for certain specified events of default, and in the event of uncured default, the acceleration of the maturity date, an increase in the applicable interest rate with respect to amounts outstanding under the Loan and payment of additional fees.

On February 26, 2019, pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company issued to Post Road 425,000 shares of common stock valued at $1,606,500 and recorded the amount as a debt issuance cost and amortized it through February 26, 2022. The Company will issue an additional 200,000 shares of its common stock upon the next subsequent funding, if any, under the Loan.

On August 22, 2019, the Company and Post Road entered into an agreement (the “Amendment”) to amend and waive certain provisions of the Credit Agreement. Pursuant to the Amendment, Post Road agreed to waive terms of certain obligations and covenants in the Credit Agreement and fund the Company an additional loan of $2,500,000. The Company agreed to issue to Post Road 550,000 shares of its common stock and an additional 200,000 shares of its common stock on November 15, 2019.

In September 2019, the Company paid off the Credit Agreement from the proceeds received from the Securities Purchase Agreement discussed below.

Other Financing

Securities Purchase Agreement

In September 2019, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with institutional and accredited investors and sold: (i) 18,852,272 common stock units. Each unit consisted one share of common stock, one Series A warrant to purchase one share of common stock and one Series B Warrant to purchase one share of common stock at price of $1.76 per share (the “Common Stock”),and (ii) 3,875,000 pre-funded warrants for the purchase of common stock units at a price to the public of $1.50$1.75 per share. These common stock units consisted of one share together with five-year warrantsof common stock, one Series A warrant to purchase an aggregateone share of 1,166,667 sharescommon stock and one Series B Warrant to purchase one share of Common Stockcommon stock at an exercise price of $1.87. The Underwriter agreed to purchase the shares from the Company pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement at a price of $1.3949$0.01 per share. The grossCompany received net proceeds toof $37,658,167 after deducting expenses of $2,303,083.

The Series A warrant provides for an exercise price of $2.25 per share and expires in September 2024. The Series B warrant provides for an exercise of $1.84 and expires in March 2021. The pre-funded warrants do not expire and are immediately exercisable except that the Company from the offering were approximately $3.5 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payablepre-funded warrants cannot be exercised by the Company. The offering closed on March 15, 2017. In addition, underholder if, after giving effect thereto, the termsholder would beneficially own more than 9.99% of the UnderwritingCompany’s common stock, subject to certain exceptions. The pre-funded warrants are classified as equity in accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and the fair value of the pre-funded warrants was recorded as a credit to common stock and is not subject to remeasurement. In October 2019, all of the pre-funded warrants were exercised in a cashless transaction resulting in the issuance of 3,845,193 shares of common stock.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company granted the Underwriterissued warrants to a 45-day optionplacement agent to purchase up to (i) up to 350,000 additional909,091 shares of Commonits common stock. These warrants have exercise price of $3.00 per share and expire in September 2024. These warrants are classified as equity.

Redeemable Preferred Stock

From December 31, 2019 through July 2020, the Company issued 221 shares of 8% Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Option Shares”“Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock”) atin a purchase priceseries of $1.3949 per one Option Share, taking into accountprivate placement transactions exempt from the Underwriter’s discount, and/or (ii) warrants to purchase up to 175,000 additional sharesregistration requirements of Common Stock (the “Option Warrants”). The Underwriter partially exercised their over-allotment option on 109,133 Option Warrants.

The offering was made pursuant to the Company’s effective registration statement on Form S-3 (Registration Statement No. 333-213575) previously filed with and declared effective by the SEC and a prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus filed with the SEC.

The Underwriting Agreement contained customary representations, warranties and agreements by the Company, customary conditions to closing, indemnification obligations of the Company and the Underwriter, including for liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, other obligationsfor an aggregate purchase price of $14,132,951.

The Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock is governed by the terms of a Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of the parties and termination provisions. The representations, warranties and covenants contained in the Underwriting Agreement were made only for purposes of such agreement and as of specific dates, were solely for the benefit of the parties to such agreement, and may be subject to limitations agreed upon by the contracting parties.

Conversion of Preferred shares into common stock

On March 7, 2017, the Company received conversion notices from holders of an aggregate of $1,950,000, or 195 shares of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series A-1 ConvertibleC Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Shares”).  The Preferred Shares converted into shares of common stock, $0.00001 par value per share, of the Company at a 13% discount to a public offering and became effective upon the filing by the Company of a prospectus supplement disclosing the terms of an offering. The closing of the public offering took place March 15, 2017 and the public offering price was set at $1.50, therefore the discounted conversion price for the preferred shareholders was calculated at $1.305. The number of shares to be issued was approximately 881,226.

73

Amendment 2016 13% + Eurodollar rate Senior Secured Credit Agreement

On March 6, 2017, Elephant Talk Europe Holding B.V., an entity organized under the laws of the Netherlands (the “Borrower”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, as borrower, the Company, Pareteum North America Corp., a Delaware corporation, Elephant Talk Group International B.V., an entity organized under the laws of the Netherlands, Corbin Mezzanine Fund I, L.P. (“Lender”) and Atalaya Administrative LLC, a New York limited liability company, as administrative agent and collateral agent for the Lender, entered into a Letter Agreement (the “Agreement”) to amend certain terms of the credit agreement among the parties, dated November 17, 2014, as has been amended from time to time (as so amended, the “Amended and Restated Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning as set forth in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.

Pursuant to the Agreement, (i) the Maturity Date will be extended to December 31, 2018; (ii) the amortization schedule will be as follows: Q1-17: $1,500,000; Q2-17: $1,500,000; Q3-17: $500,000; Q4-17: $500,000; Q1-18: $750,000; Q2-18: $750,000; Q3-18: $750,000; Q4-18: Balloon; (iii) a new financial covenants package shall be agreed upon by the parties by April 30, 2017; and (iv) the Warrants will be amended as follows: (a) the aggregate amount of shares of common stock underlying the Warrants will be increased to 1,446,000 (post-reverse split); (b) the exercise price of the Warrants will be set at the lesser of (A) $3.25 per share (post-reverse split) or (B) a 13% discount to the offering price of shares of common stock in an underwritten public offering (the “Equity Offering”) of the Company; and (c) the anti-dilution sections (Sections 9(d) and 9(h)) of the Warrants shall be removed.

Reversed Stock-Split

On February 23, 2017, the Company filed a certificate of amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation (the “Certificate of Amendment”Designation”), effective after the market closed on February 24, 2017 (the “Effective Date”),file with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, in order to effectwhich establishes and designates the previously announced 1-for-25 reverse stock splitrights, powers and preferences of such securities. Under the Certificate of Designation, each share of Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock has a stated value of $100,000 per share (the “Reverse Split”“Stated Value”). PursuantNon-cumulative dividends are required to be paid on each share of the Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock at a rate of 8% per annum of the Stated Value. The Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock ranks senior to our common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company. Upon any liquidation event, the holders of the Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock are entitled to be paid out of the assets of the Company legally available for distribution to its stockholders a liquidation preference of $0.00001 per share, plus an amount equal to any unpaid dividends to and including the date of payment, but without interest, before any distribution of assets is made to holders of the Company’s common stock, or any other class or series of stock. The Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock has no voting rights except as required by law. On the one-year anniversary of the date of issuance of the Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock, the Company is required to redeem, out of legally available funds, each such share of Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock at a price per share equal to 112.5% of the Stated Value.

The issuance of this Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock was accounted for as a liability in accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. Accordingly, the Company recorded a liability of $22,066,951 equal to the Reverse Split, every 25stated value of the issued shares through July 2020 and a debt discount of $7,934,000 for the difference between the stated value and the gross proceeds of $14,132,951. The Company incurred placement and legal fees totaling $366,521. The debt discount is being amortized from the various issuance dates through to the various redemption dates using the effective interest rate method. The placement and legal fees are being amortized from December 2019, the date of the first issuance of such securities, through December 2020.

By their terms, the shares of Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock are not convertible into other securities of the Company. However, the Company entered into Exchange Agreements as of various dates from July 2020 through October 2020, with the Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock holders (collectively, the “Agreements”). Under such Agreements, the Company and the holders agreed that (i) the Company may exchange outstanding shares of Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock for shares of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock have beenon the one-year anniversary of the issuance date of those shares; and (ii) the holders may exchange outstanding shares of Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock for shares of the Company’s common stock at any time prior to the one-year anniversary of the issuance date of those shares. Such exchanges are subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including approval of the Company’s stockholders of the issuance of such common stock and the Company’s ability to issue shares of common stock not subject to restrictions on resale. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon exchange of the Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock under the Agreements will determined by the application of a formula in which (i) the stated value of the shares of Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock being converted into oneplus the value of any accrued and unpaid dividends plus, with respect to certain agreed upon shares of the Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock, a premium of 12.5% on the stated value is divided by (ii) the conversion price. The conversion price for holders of 159 shares of Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock in the aggregate is $0.70, while the conversion price for the holder of the other 62 shares of Series C Redeemable Preferred Stock is the lower of (i) $0.60 and (ii) the greater of (x) the average daily volume-weighted average price per share of common stock.Common Stock during the five trading days before the closing of the exchange and (y) $0.40.

Senior Convertible Note

On June 8, 2020, the Company issued an $17,500,000 in principal amount of an 8% Senior Secured Convertible Note due April 1, 2025 (the “Senior Convertible Note” or the “Note”) to High Trail Investments SA LLC (“High Trail”) for $14,000,000.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On June 8, 2020, the Company received $4,000,000 of the $14,000,000 and incurred legal fees of $332,546. The Reverse Split took effect at 4:01 p.m., Eastern Time,remaining balance $10,000,000 was received by the Company but was deposited into a non-springing bank account based on terms of an Control Agreement. Under the terms of the Control Agreement, the Company has no right or any other right or ability to control, access, pick up, withdraw or transfer, deliver or dispose of items or funds from the non-springing account. Under the terms of the Senior Convertible Note, the remaining balance of $10,000,000 will be released to the Company subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions as follows:

·$3,000,000 when the Company receives $4,000,000 in additional financing. The Company received the additional financing in July 2020 and the $3,000,000 was released to the Company to be used for working capital purposes.

·$7,000,000 when the Company meets certain specified conditions (the “Specified Conditions”) on or prior to October 31, 2020 the “Specified Conditions Date”). The $7,000,000 will be reported as restricted cash until the Specified Conditions are met on the Specified Conditions Date.

The Specified Conditions include satisfaction of certain equity conditions and other conditions as of any date and on each of the 20 previous trading days prior to such date as defined in the Senior Convertible Note. The satisfaction of the certain equity conditions includes:

·the Company’s being able to issue shares of its common stock upon conversion that are not subject to restrictions on resale;

·High Trail not, upon conversion, beneficially owning in excess of 4.99% of the Company’s outstanding common stock;

·the Company at all times having sufficient authorized and unissued shares of its common stock available for the issuance of common stock upon conversion equal to the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest;

·the average daily volume-weighted average price per share of the Company’s common stock being not less than $0.50 (for a common stock change event as defined in the Note) and the daily dollar trading volume (as reported on Bloomberg) for the Company’s common stock on such date and for at least 17 of the prior 20 trading days being not less than $750,000;

·there being no defaults or events of a default that have occurred or are continuing;

·the Company having obtained the requisite stockholder approval required by the Nasdaq Stock Market for the issuance of the shares of its common stock upon conversion;

·the average daily volume-weighted average price per share of the Company’s common stock being not less than $0.85 (for a common stock change event as defined in the Note); and

·the absence of any defaults or events of default.

The Note contains customary events of default, as well as events of default if the Company fails to use reasonable efforts to obtain the approval of its stockholders of the issuance of the shares issuable upon conversion by October 31, 2020, the Company’s shares cease to be traded on the Effective Date,NASDAQ Stock Market, or the Company fails to restate its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 and the quarters ended March 31, 2019 and June 30, 2019, in each case, prior to October 31, 2020 or fails to timely file its subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or its subsequent annual reports on Form 10-K with the SEC in the manner and within the time periods required by the Exchange Act. The Company is currently in default.

Beginning October 1, 2020, and on the first day of each calendar month thereafter, at the election of High Trail, the Company can be required to redeem a portion of the Note. The amount of each redemption payment will be up to $3,500,000, provided, that in any case the amount of any redemption payment will not exceed the principal amount then outstanding under the Notes.

If the Company elects the option to pay an optional redemption payment in shares of its common stock beganon any optional redemption date, High Trail shall have the right to allocate all or any portion of the applicable optional redemption payment (or applicable portion thereof) to one or more scheduled trading days during the period beginning on, and including, the applicable optional redemption date and ending on, and including, the scheduled trading day immediately before the subsequent optional redemption date or defer such optional redemption payment (or applicable portion thereof) to any future optional redemption date selected by High Trail.

The Senior Convertible Note has a split-adjusted basis whenstated interest rate of 8.0% per year, payable monthly in arrears at the market openedCompany’s option in cash or shares of its common stock or a combination of both cash and shares of the Company’s common stock beginning on February 27, 2017.  No fractionalAugust 1, 2020. On December 8, 2020 the Company and High Trail entered into a letter agreement whereby the Company agreed that High Trail would accept 1,093,750 shares were issued if,of the Company’s common stock in full satisfaction of the Company’s obligation to make an interest payment on December 1, 2020.

If the Company fails to pay any amount payable on this Note on or before the due date as provided in the Note, then, regardless of whether such failure constitutes an event of default, or a default or event of default occurs as set forth in the Note (such amount payable or the principal amount outstanding as of such failure to pay or default or event of default, (as applicable, a “Defaulted Amount”), then in each case, interest (“Default Interest”) will accrue on such Defaulted Amount at a rate per annum equal to 18.0%, from, and including, such due date or the date of such default or event of default, as applicable, to, but excluding, the date such failure to pay or default or event of default is cured and all outstanding Default Interest under the Note has been paid, as applicable. As a result of the Reverse Split,Company’s defaults under the terms of the High Trail Note, it is currently paying the Default Interest rate.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

If the Company elects to pay the stated interest (or any applicable portion thereof) in shares of its common stock, High Trail shall have the right to allocate all or any portion of the applicable payment of the stated interest (or applicable portion thereof) to one or more scheduled trading days as defined in the Senior Convertible Note) during the period beginning on, and including, the applicable interest payment date and ending on, and including, the scheduled trading day immediately before the subsequent interest payment date (or defer such payment of the stated interest (or applicable portion thereof) to any future Interest payment date selected by High Trail.

The number of shares of common stock to be issued by the Company for payment for both the optional redemption payment and the stated interest amounts are determined as set forth in the Note by dividing each amount by 85% of the lowest average daily volume-weighted average price per share of the Company’s common stock during the 10 trading day period ending on the trading day immediately prior to such interest payment or the optional redemption payment payable in shares of common stock.

The Senior Convertible Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock including any portion constituting an optional redemption payment amount and other circumstances as set forth in the Note at High Trail’s election. The initial conversion rate is equal to 1,666.667 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Note, or $0.60 per share. However, when the Company receives the $4,000,000 in additional financing and if the additional financing date conversion rate is lower than the initial current conversion rate, the initial conversion rate shall be reduced to equal the additional financing date conversion rate; and, provided, further, that on the Specified Conditions Date, if the Specified Conditions conversion rate is lower than the then current conversion rate, the conversion rate at the time shall be reduced to equal the Specified Conditions conversion rate. The conversion rate is further subject to changes based on subsequent equity issuances as defined in the Note.

The additional financing conversion rate is computed as follows: per $1,000 principal amount of the Senior Convertible Note divided by the last reported stock price on the trading date prior to the additional financing date multiplied by 105% (based on the last reported stock price prior to the Company receiving the additional financing). In July 2020, the Company received the additional financing amount and the additional financing conversion rate was higher than the initial conversion rate of 1,666.667, based on the last reported stock on the trading date prior to the Company receiving the additional financing. As a stockholder would otherwise have been entitledresult, the initial conversion rate remained the same.

The Specified Conditions conversion rate is computed as follows: per $1,000 principal amount of the Senior Convertible Notes divided by the last reported stock price on the trading date prior to a fractional share. Instead, each stockholder was entitled to receive a cash payment which was based upon the volumeadditional financing date multiplied by 105% on the weighted average price forof the five (5) days precedingCompany’s common stock in respect of the Effective Date.period from the scheduled open of trading until the scheduled close of trading immediately before the Specified Conditions Date, which the Company has not yet met.

 

74

The Reverse Split followed (i) the granting of authority to the Board of DirectorsNote is secured by a first lien on substantially all assets of the Company (the “Board”),and substantially all assets of its material U.S. organized subsidiaries and the assets of Pareteum Europe BV, a subsidiary organized in the Netherlands. In addition, the Note contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including restrictions on indebtedness, equity securities, liens, dividends, distributions, acquisitions, investments, sale or transfer of assets, transactions with affiliates and maintenance of certain financial ratios.

All payments due under the Note rank senior to all other indebtedness of the Company to the extent of the value of the Collateral and any Subordinated Indebtedness.

If the Company undergoes a fundamental change as set forth in the Note, High Trail will have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or part of the Note in cash equal to of the greater of (i) 120% of the then outstanding principal amount of the Note (or portion thereof) and (ii) 120% of the product of (A) the conversion rate in effect as of the trading day immediately preceding the effective date of such fundamental change; (B) the principal amount of this Note to be repurchased upon a fundamental change divided by $1,000; and (C) the highest daily volume-weighted average price per share of the Company’s common stock occurring during the consecutive volume-weighted average price per share of the Company’s common stock trading days ending on, and including, the daily volume-weighted average price per share of the Company’s common stock on the trading day immediately before the effective date of such fundamental change.

If the Company enters into a bankruptcy proceeding as set forth in the Note, then the then-outstanding portion of the principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest will immediately become due and payable to High Trail. In addition, at High Trail’s option, the Note will become due and payable immediately for cash equal to an default acceleration amount upon certain events of default as set forth in the Note, which includes, the Company not filing its restated financial statements with the SEC for (A) the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (B) the quarter ended March 31, 2019 and (C) the quarter ended June 30, 2019, in each case on or prior to October 31, 2020 and in compliance with all requirements under the Exchange Act and after October 31, 2020 (A) the Company timely filing its subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or its subsequent annual reports on Form 10-K with the SEC in the manner and within the time periods required by the Exchange Act.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The default acceleration amount is equal to the greater of (A) 120% of the then outstanding principal amount of this Note plus accrued and unpaid interest; and (B) 120% of the product of (i) the conversion rate in effect as of the trading day immediately preceding the date such notice is delivered; (ii) the total then outstanding principal portion of the Note plus accrued and unpaid interest; and (iii) the greater of (x) the highest daily volume-weighted average price per share of the Company’s stockholderscommon stock occurring during the 30 consecutive volume-weighted average price per share of the Company’s common stock trading days ending on, and including, the daily volume-weighted average price per share of the Company’s common stock on the trading day before the date the applicable event of default occurred.

In connection with Senior Convertible Note, the Company granted a warrant to purchase 15,000,000 shares of its common stock to High Trail at an exercise price of $0.58 per share expiring on June 8, 2025. Under the 2016 Annual MeetingForbearance Agreement, the exercise price of Stockholders heldthe warrant was reduced to $0.37 per share.

Goodwill and Intangible impairment (in thousands)

During the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2019, the Company performed its annual impairment test for goodwill and impairment test of finite-lived intangible assets based on August 16, 2016,the existence of certain triggering events. The results of the impairment tests are preliminary. As a result of the deteriorating business conditions, the Company estimates an impairment charge of $123,168 related to the goodwill and finite-lived intangible assets associated with the Company’s acquisition of Artilium. The Company hired a third-party valuation expert to value the assets due to the significant judgements and expertise required to model the assumptions used. The Company operates in a single reporting unit. The Company estimated the fair value of its discretion,reporting unit utilizing a discounted cash flow model. The Company utilized various income-based and cost-based methods to determine whetherthe fair value of the intangible assets in the impairment test.

Changes in Executive Officers

On November 1, 2019, the Company’s board of directors replaced Edward O’Donnell, the Company’s previous chief financial officer. Mr. O’Donnell subsequently separated from the Company.

On November 22, 2019, the Company’s board of directors terminated Robert H. Turner from his positions as Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

On October 9, 2019, the Company and Denis McCarthy, the Company’s former chief operating officer, entered into a settlement agreement and release (the “McCarthy Separation Agreement”) pursuant to proceedwhich Mr. McCarthy’s at-will employment agreement with the Reverse SplitCompany was terminated and Mr. McCarthy ceased all positions with the Company and its subsidiaries, including as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer. Pursuant to select and file the CertificateMcCarthy Separation Agreement, Mr. McCarthy received a severance payment of Amendment$225,000, paid in equal monthly installments according to the Company’s certificatepayroll practices over a period of incorporation12 months from the date of the McCarthy Separation Agreement, and agreed not to effect the Reverse Split at a ratio to be determined by the Board and (ii) the subsequent approval bytrade in the Company’s Board on February 14, 2017securities through October 1, 2021. Mr. McCarthy also agreed to forego earned and unearned bonuses and vested and unvested stock options will lapse. The McCarthy Separation Agreement also includes customary provisions regarding nondisclosure of confidential information, non-disparagement, release, representations and warranties, and the return of confidential information.

On June 9, 2020, the Company and Victor Bozzo, the Company’s Chief Commercial Officer, entered into a separation agreement (the “Bozzo Separation Agreement”) pursuant to which Mr. Bozzo resigned as Chief Commercial Officer of the enactmentCompany, and from all other offices and positions he held with the Company or any of its subsidiaries, effective as of June 9, 2020. Pursuant to the Reverse Split atBozzo Separation Agreement, Mr. Bozzo received as severance pay: (i) an amount equal to his then-current salary, paid over time in accordance with the ratioCompany’s normal payroll practices, for a period of 1-for-25. 

All warrant, option, share and per share information in these financial statements and footnotes give retroactive effect for the Reverse Split. All numbers in the financial statements and footnotes included herein give effect to all financial information as if the Reverse Split had occurredfour months beginning on the date reported. of the Bozzo Separation Agreement; and (ii) a continuation of Company-provided health insurance benefits during such four-month period on the same terms with respect to sharing of premium costs as apply to active employees enrolled for the same coverage. The Company also agreed to award Mr. Bozzo options to purchase up to 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. These stock options have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, vested immediately upon issuance and expire three years from the date of the grant. Mr. Bozzo agreed to forego earned and unearned bonuses and unvested stock options will lapse. The Bozzo Separation Agreement also includes customary provisions regarding the release of the Company for any claims by Mr. Bozzo, nondisclosure of confidential information, non-disparagement and the return of confidential information. Following his separation, Mr. Bozzo continues to be subject to certain restrictive covenants, including, non-competition and non-solicitation covenants.


Pareteum Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Delisting of the Company’s Common Stock

On November 5, 2020, the Company notified the Nasdaq Hearings Panel that it would not be able to file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2019, its amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2018, its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 or its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020 by November 9, 2020, the date by which the Hearing Panel had required the Company to make such filings in order for the Company’s common stock to remain listed on Nasdaq. In response to the Company’s notice to Nasdaq that it would not satisfy the conditions to the exception to the listing requirements granted by the Hearings Panel, Nasdaq notified the Company by letter dated November 10, 2020 that the Company’s common stock would be delisted, and trading of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq’s Capital Market was suspended effective at the open of business on November 12, 2020. After the trading of the Company’s common stock was suspended by Nasdaq, prices for the Company’s common stock began to be quoted on the OTC Markets Group Inc.’s Pink Open Market.


ItemItem 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.

 

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures (Restated)

 

(a)(a)Material Weaknesses Identified in Original Filing - Disclosure Controls and Procedures.Procedures

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our interim chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our

In connection with preparing the Original Filing, management with the participation of our principal executive officer and chief financial officer (our principal financial officer), hashad evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 131-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). In accordance with guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, companies are permitted to exclude acquisitions from their final assessment of internal control over financial reporting for the first fiscal year in which the acquisition occurred. Our management’s evaluation of internal control over financial reporting excluded the internal control activities of Artilium PLC. (“Artilium”), which we acquired in October 2018, as discussed in Note 25, "Business Combinations," of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We have included the financial results of these in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Total revenues and net income subject to Artilium’s internal control over financial reporting represented approximately 26% and 4% of our consolidated total revenues and net loss for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, respectively. Total assets and net assets subject to Artilium’s internal control over financial reporting represented approximately 20% and 13% of our consolidated total assets and net assets, excluding acquisition method fair value adjustments, as of December 31, 2016.2018, respectively. Based on that evaluation our managementthe Company concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, as further described below, because of material weaknesses in our control environment and therefore our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2016. 2018.

 

 75(b)

(b)Material Weaknesses Identified in Original Filing - Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial ReportingReporting. .

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

 

·pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

 

·provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

 

·provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

 

In connection with preparing the Original Filing, our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and in making this assessment used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).  Based on the foregoing evaluation, our management has identified the following deficiencies that constitute material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting:

·Inadequate and ineffective management assessment of internal control over financial reporting, including insufficient experienced resources to complete the documentation of internal control assessment; and

·Ineffective design, implementation and monitoring of information technology general controls pertaining to the Company’s change management process.

Based on these material weaknesses, the Company’s management concluded that at December 31, 2018, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective.

Baker Tilly US, LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, expressed an unqualified opinion for the audit of our consolidated financial statements, as reported in our original Form 10-K, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 and issued an adverse opinion in its report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.


(c)Additional Material Weaknesses Identified in this Form 10-K

As part of management’s re-evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting in connection with preparing this amended Form 10-K, management identified additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, where the Company did not maintain an effective design and operating procedures for:

·entity level controls were not effective due to certain executive management “tone at the top” issues which contributed to an ineffective control environment and to deficiencies aggregating to material weaknesses and;

·

the Company did not have sufficient accounting and finance department resources to effectively assess risk, and design, operate and oversee effective internal controls over financial reporting, which contributed to the failure in the effectiveness of certain controls. In addition, the Company’s controls related to revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, business combination, foreign currency translation and settlement of payables were not effective.

Collectively, the material weaknesses identified in the Original Filing and the additional material weaknesses identified in this amended Form 10-K resulted in misstatements in multiple accounts and the related footnote disclosures for the quarterly and annual periods in 2018. These misstatements were corrected through restatement of the financial statements for this period.

Remediation to Address Material Weaknesses

Management and the Company’s board of directors have been implementing and continue to implement measures designed to ensure that control deficiencies contributing to the material weakness are remediated, such that these controls are designed, implemented and operating effectively.

The audit committee of the Company’s board of directors, with the assistance of independent legal counsel and a separate independent accounting firm, took action to immediately begin investigating the causes of the Restatement as soon as the board, upon the recommendation of the audit committee, and after consultation with management and the auditors, concluded that the Company’s financial statements included in the Original Form 10-K and other reports could not be relied upon. As a result of this independent investigation and related deliberations, the board of directors terminated or otherwise separated each of the following executive officers who served during the time period of the conduct that gave rise to the Company’s need to effect the Restatement: Robert H. Turner, the Company’s former chief executive officer, Edward O’Donnell, the Company’s former chief financial officer, Denis McCarthy, the Company’s former chief operating officer, and Victor Bozzo, the Company’s former chief commercial officer. The Company has also taken and will continue to take significant and comprehensive remedial actions in response to the conduct and other factors that led to the Restatement, including actions to begin to remediate the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Remediation actions already implemented include (i) a thorough review and documentation of all processes involved in our financial reporting to ensure that there is segregation of duties, (ii) access security and documented review processes in place that happen at appropriate intervals throughout the year that covers all elements of the Company’s financial reporting. This includes, but is not limited to, testing samples and documenting that testing has occurred with the results of the findings being reported to senior management and that they occur at appropriate intervals and continuously making improvements to our processes as necessary.

To address ineffective design, implementation and monitoring of information technology general controls pertaining to the Company’s change management process, the Company has (iii) removed all live access to all developers, internal and external, from being able to make coding changes directly in our reporting system; (iv) will continue to monitor and document all changes made in our reporting system and add additional layers of documented review of these changes; (v) will institute sample testing of changes made in our reporting system to ensure the documented policies are being followed and report the results of these tests to senior management in regular appropriate intervals; (vi) document and implement information technology policies based upon industry leading practices; (vii) adding personnel who will have information technology control oversight and support roles and (viii) enhance our quarterly reporting on the remediation measures to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

Additionally, to ensure the company maintains a strong internal control environment and to remediate the additional material weakness in internal controls over financial reporting identified in this amended Form 10-K, the Company: (ix) has ceased the employment of personnel responsible for the revenue restatement and oversight of accounting for stock-based compensation; (x) is designing and implementing enhancements to internal controls over financial reporting including those related to sales processing, revenue recognition and equity accounting; (xi) has implemented a periodic review of financial reports and month-over-month balances with the purpose of identifying and investigating fluctuations and discrepancies in key accounts and transactions; (xii) will provide training to its finance and sales staff and key personnel on the appropriate guidelines to account for revenue in the telecom industry and emphasizing the importance of adherence to policies and procedures; (xiii) is implementing a new application to manage equity; (xiv) engaged outside resources and hired in-house controls personnel to monitor and assess internal controls over financial reporting.


We believe that these actions will remediate the material weaknesses. While we have taken measures to strengthen our internal controls related to these additional material weaknesses, we have not fully completed our assessment. The material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until the applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.

As our management continues to evaluate and work to improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we may determine to take additional measures to address these deficiencies or determine to modify certain of the remediation measures described above.



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Pareteum Corporation

Opinion on the Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Pareteum Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described below on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control — IntegratedFramework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013 (“COSO”).

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Artilium PLC., which is included in the December 31, 2018 consolidated financial statements of the Company and constituted 20% and 13% of total and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2018 and 26% and 4% of revenues and net loss, respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Artilium PLC.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended (collectively, the “financial statements”) and our report dated December 14, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included explanatory paragraphs relating to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, the restatement of its 2018 financial statements and the change in accounting principle related to revenue recognition.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s assessment:

The Company’s entity level controls were not effective due to certain “tone at the top” issues which contributed to an ineffective control environment and to deficiencies aggregating to material weaknesses.

The Company conducted an inadequate and ineffective management assessment of internal control over financial reporting, including insufficient experienced resources to complete the documentation of internal control assessment and ineffective design, implementation and monitoring of information technology general controls pertaining to the Company’s change management process.

The Company did not have sufficient accounting and finance department resources to effectively assess risk, and design, operate and oversee effective internal controls over financial reporting, which contributed to the failure in the effectiveness of certain controls. In addition, the Company’s controls related to revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, business combination, foreign currency translation and settlement of payables were not effective.

These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2018 financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated December 14, 2020 on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements due to its inherent limitations.  Management’smisstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as to future periods are subject to the risksrisk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 and in making this assessment used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Framework) in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Based on the foregoing evaluation, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

 

/s/ Baker Tilly US, LLP (formerly Squar Milner LLP)

(c)Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended

Los Angeles, California 

December 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.14, 2020


Item 9B. Other Information

 

Effective as of March 31, 2016, Mark Nije, through his management entity, LMI Europe B.V., resigned from the Company as its Chief Financial Officer. The Company has an agreement with Mr. Nije to make monthly cash severance payments for twelve months to LMI Europe B.V. equal to an aggregate of Euro 240,000, plus VAT.

Effective as of March 31, 2016, Alex Vermeulen, through his management entity, Scere Company Italy S.R.I., resigned from the Company as its General Counsel, Secretary and Compliance Officer. The Company has an agreement with Mr. Vermeulen to (i) make monthly cash severance payments for six months to Scere Company Italy S.R.I. equal to an aggregate of Euro 81,000, (ii) grant to Mr. Vermeulen 4,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock and (iii) allow 1,333 options which had not yet vested to vest immediately.

Effective as of December 31, 2016, it was mutually agreed with Gary Brandt and his management entity, Blue Ridge Consulting LLC, that the restructuring consultancy services, including the services of Mr. Brandt as Chief Restructuring Officer would cease. This agreed cessation of services was not as a result of any disagreement between Mr. Brandt and the Company.

Effective as of January 31, 2016, Timothy Payne, stepped down as Interim President of the Company’s North America subsidiary, ET North America Corp. The Company has an agreement with Mr Payne to (i) pay severance equivalent to six monthly gross base salaries (US$ $105.000) less taxes; (ii) vest and accelerate certain stock options (pursuant to 4,000 options which were granted on April 17, 2014). Mr Payne did not resign as a result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company's operations, policies or practices.

Effective as of September 30, 2016, Patrick M. Carroll, resigned from all positions held at the Company, following the divestment and management-lead buy-out of ValidSoft.

76

Effective as of March 31, 2017, Erik Kloots will resign from the Company as its Principal Accounting Officer. The Company has an agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Mr. Kloots to (i) make a lump sum severance payment of gross Euro 121,289.41 (USD $ 129,746) no later than March 31, 2017, (ii) pay all unused holidays and pro-rata calculations of 2016 holiday allowance, (iii) keep the Company laptop, and (iv) keep all past awarded stock-options through the life of the options. Mr. Kloots will not resign as a result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices.

Effective as of November 2, 2016, Armin Gustav Hessler submitted his resignation as the Company’s Chief Operations Officer. The Company has agreed to make monthly cash severance payments to Mr. Hessler for a period of nine months from the date of his resignation, equal to an aggregate gross amount of Euro 180,000 (USD $ 198,034).  The Company has also agreed to allow Mr. Hessler to keep an aggregate of 88,000 vested stock options.   Mr. Hessler did not resign as a result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices.

None.

 

PART III

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.Governance

 

Directors & Executive Officers

 

Set forth below are the Company’s Directors and key Executive Officers as atof December 31, March 2017,2018, together with an overview of their professional experience and expertise.

 

Name Age Position(s) Held Director
Since
 Age Position(s) Held Director
Since
        
Robert H. Turner 67 Executive Chairman of the Board 2015 68 Executive Chairman of the Board 2015
Robert Skaff (1) (2) (3) 47 Director 2015
Roderick de Greef (1) (2) (3) 56 Director 2015
Yves van Sante (1) (2) (3) 55 Director 2014 58 Director 2014
Luis Jimenez-Tuñon (1) (2) (3) 37 Director 2017 39 Director 2017
Robert Lippert (1) (2) (3) 55 Director 2018
Victor Bozzo 49 Chief Executive Officer N/A 50 Chief Executive Officer N/A
Edward O’Donnell (4) 51 Chief Financial Officer N/A
Erik Kloots (5) 52 Principal Accounting Officer N/A
Alexander Korff (6) 34 General Counsel, Secretary & Compliance Officer N/A
Edward O’Donnell 53 Chief Financial Officer N/A
Denis McCarthy 44 President N/A

 

(1)Currently a member of the Audit and Finance Committee.
(2)Currently a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
(3)Currently a member of the Compensation Committee.
(4)Chief Financial Officer since January 9, 2017
(5)Principal Accounting Officer from April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017
(6)Significant employee

 


Robert H. Turnerwas appointed Executive Chairman of the Board on November 16, 2015. Mr. Turner has 40 years’ experience, cultivating and growing “all stage” global software, telecom and tech companies. He emphasizes strategy, sales, organizational leadership, and fundamental financial results and leads with a culture that passionately serves the needs of valued constituents, while sustaining growth. Mr. Turner launched his career at AT&T, where he rose to serve at the highest ranks in a broad spectrum of international, start-up, and corporate firms, including (selected highlights): NeoNova Network Services, Inc.; Pac West; Telecom, Inc.; Panterra Networks; PTT Telecom Netherlands, US Inc. (now KPN); and BellSouth Communications, Inc. (now AT&T). Mr. Turner is also an advisory board member of The Capital Angels, affiliated with SC Angel Network. Mr. Turner earned a Bachelor of Science degree and a Master of Business Administration from the University of South Carolina, where he was presented with a Distinguished Alumni award in 2010. Mr. Turner is Guest Lecturer in the Darla Moore School of Business Professional MBA program

77

Robert Skaffhas been a director since December 16, 2015. Mr. Skaff is the founder of DiNotte Lighting Hampton which has developed world-class OEM and recreational lighting products since 2005 and currently serves as a consultant for various manufacturing companies. Mr. Skaff was previously the president of ID Control, a manufacturer of patented mobile video equipment for police vehicles and served as Vice President for Decatur Electronics. Mr. Skaff was a principal and director of Management Information Systems at Johnson and Johnston Associates which was later acquired by Gould Electronics, a subsidiary of Japan Energy.program.

 

Roderick de Greefhas beenYves van Sante was appointed a director since September 23, 2015. He previously served as a director of the Company from January 2008 to October 2011. Mr. de Greef (1961) is Chief Financial Officer of BioLife Solutions, Inc, a publicly listed biotechnology company. He has over 25 years of public company CFO experience with companies such as Cardiac Science, BioLife Solutions, Inc., and Cambridge Heart, Inc. Mr. de Greef has been extensively involved in numerous financing transactions and several domestic international M&A transactions. Mr. de Greef has also been member of the board of directors of several public and private companies over the past 15 years, including Endologix, Inc. He was a member of the Board and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Pareteum Communications, Inc., from 2008 to 2011. Mr. de Greef received a BA in Economics and International Relations from San Francisco State University and an MBA from the University of Oregon.

Yves van Santehas been a director sinceon June 1, 2014. From July 2011 to May 2014, Mr. van Sante was a board observer for our Company, following his service on our Board of Directors from October 2006 to July 2011. MrMr. van Sante (1960) studied Marketing, Communication and Commercial Management. He started his career in 1982 as an advisor at United Brokers and became sales manager for Brinkers International, the market leader in refining oil for the food industry, a year later. From 1987 until 1993 he served as Sales and Marketing manager Central Europe at 3C Communications in Luxemburg, where he launched Credit Card Telephony across Europe. Following this position, he became a business unit manager Public Telephony at Belgacom, the Belgium incumbent, where he managed a department of 650 employees and a € 40 million business. In 1994, together with Steven van der Velden, Yves van Sante co-founded InTouch Telecom. As its managing director he was responsible for business development, sales and marketing. In 1999, when achieving a turnover of € 25 million and having grown to 125 staff, InTouch was sold to GTS, a pan European Telecom operator. Mr. van Sante became vice-president Business Services with GTS in London, where he consolidated acquisitions and turned the voice Telco around into an IP operator. In 2000 he became Managing Director of Eport, a call centrecenter owned by the Port of Ostend. After six months Eport was sold to the Dutch call-centrecall-center Call-IT, and Mr. van Sante became advisor to its Management Board. In 2002 he founded Q.A.T. Investments. Concurrently, he has held various Management and Board functions in companies in the QAT portfolio. Mr. van Sante is a member of De Warande and member of the Board of Directors of Festival of Flanders.

 

Luis Jimenez-Tuñon has been was appointed a director sinceDirector of Pareteum Corporation on March 1, 2017. Mr. Jimenez-Tuñon is a distinguished mobile telecommunications industry leader, havingand a highly accomplished senior executive with +15 years of success in telecommunications, mobile, technology, satellite, IoT and banking industries. In his executive career, he held leadership positions at Eutelsat EPA:ETL (Worldwide Executive Vice President); Red Queen Ventures (CEO); Vodafone Enabler Spain (CEO); Vodafone LON:VOD (Senior Vice President; previously VP Strategy; and before Executive for New Business); and INSA (Deputy Commercial Director), among others. He grew companies and teams from $0 to + $300m annual revenue consistently exceeding financial, commercial and operational goals across global B2B and B2C markets.

Mr. Jimenez-Tuñon served as CEO of the Company’sPareteum’s largest customer, Vodafone Enabler Spain S.L. (“Vodafone Enabler”) from July 2011 to December 2016. As Chief executive of Vodafone Enabler, he pioneered the Company’s innovative business model and powered the launch of Vodafone Spain’s second brand Lowi.es which was awarded best Spanish MVNO in 2015 and 2016. As a start-up born within the Group in 2011, and under his leadership, Vodafone enabler boosted its revenue, profit and operational performance, and achieved internationalization. In addition to his role at Vodafone Enabler, during a decade at Vodafone, Mr. Jimenez-Tuñon has also held leadership positions at Vodafone Spain where he was responsible for business development and strategy of the group’s Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs), enablers, roaming services, international carriers and wholesale fixed broadband business lines.lines, growing business to hundreds of millions of euros in yearly revenue.

Since November 2017, and as Group’s Worldwide Executive Vice President of Eutelsat – one of the leading satellite operators in the world with around 1.5 billion euro in yearly revenue, Mr. Jimenez-Tuñon is currently founderreports to its Group‘s Deputy CEO and CEO ofleads its worldwide data business comprising satellite IoT, Corporate, Telecom and new data solutions; fixed data services, wholesale and NGO & humanitarian affairs. On the entrepreneurial front, Mr. Jimenez-Tuñon founded Red Queen Ventures S.L. (www.redqueen-ventures.com), a global high-tech advisory and Investment Company focused on early-stage technology, telecom, MVNO/E, satellite and aerospace. As Chief executive of Vodafone Enabler, he pioneered the Company’s innovative business modelaerospace companies in hubs like Madrid, London, New York, Miami, Palo Alto and powered the launch of Vodafone Spain’s second brand Lowi.es which was awarded best Spanish MVNO in 2015 and 2016. Started in 2011, under his leadership, Vodafone enabler boosted its revenue, profit and operational performance, and achieved internationalization. Previously, Luis held several executive positions at Vodafone Spain, including Senior Vice President where he grew business to hundreds of millions of euros in yearly revenue. Los Angeles CA.

Mr. Jimenez began his career in the satellite industry in 2002 holding various positions including Research engineer at the National Space Institute of Denmark and later Deputy Commercial Director of INSA (today ISDEFE), Spain’s leading satellite operations company managing NASA and ESA tracking stations. Luis has received several professional and academic awards at international and national levels. LuisJimenez-Tuñon earned an Executive MBA from EOI Business School, a Master’s Degree in Satellite Communications from Polytechnic University of Madrid, and an MSca M.S. in Telecommunications Engineering from the University of Zaragoza in cooperation with the Technical University of Denmark. He also completed the prestigious Executive Management Program (SEP) from the Graduate School of businessBusiness at Stanford University in California, of which he is lifetime alumni. AlongMr Jimenez-Tuñon has served on boards and advisory councils, has won numerous awards and recognitions, and has participated as speaker in many business events and round tables.


Robert Lippert was appointed a director on November 16, 2018. Dr. Lippert is a financial economist who has held corporate, consulting and academic positions in the areas of finance and strategy. He has more than two decades of business experience around the world. Dr. Lippert is also the coauthor of The New CFOs: How Finance Teams and Their Leaders Can Revolutionize Modern Business coauthored with his executive career, LuisLiz Mellon, David C. Nagel and Nigel Slack. He has been guest speakeron the faculty of Emory University, Georgia State University, Rutgers University and the University of South Carolina. He has won numerous teaching awards, published extensively, taught and consulted in 50 plus countries and been Key Note Speaker at internationalnumerous events across five continents. He currently designs and delivers a variety of Executive Education courses for DukeCE, Emory, UCLA, UNC-Chapel Hill, and University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business. Among others, clients have included: AbbVie, Alcatel, Bank of America/Merrill Lynch, BCBS, CenturyLink, ComcastNBCU, CVS, Enterprise Ireland, Farmers Insurance, HP, Home Depot, IBM, KPMG, Owens Corning, PWC, Samsung, U.S. Navy, UPS and Verizon. In addition to being a faculty member, his work in executive development, consulting, and executive coaching, Dr. Lippert was interim CFO and Vice President of Strategic Planning for the Seibels Bruce Group, a publicly traded holding company, which specialized in insurance-related activities. His primary duties in these capacities were to manage the acquisition, integration and divestiture of existing businesses; oversee the formulation and implementation of the corporate strategic plan; manage the business summitsplanning and has published several papers.

budgeting process; co-manage a multi-million-dollar investment portfolio; and interact with Wall Street analysts, investment bankers and investors in the financial community. Dr. Lippert earned his Ph.D. in Finance from the University of South Carolina and a BSBA from Xavier University.

 

78

Victor Bozzo was appointed Chief Executive Officer on November 1, 2016. Mr. Bozzo served as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Marketing for Telarix Inc., a market leader in interconnect solutions for service providers. Under Mr. Bozzo’s sales and marketing leadership, sales increased significantly, and the company received numerous market leadership accolades, ultimately leading to a highly successful exit for investors. Prior to joining Telarix, Mr. Bozzo served as President and General Manager of Pac-West’s Emerging Technologies division after selling Pac-West his startup, Factor Communications, an innovative portfolio of cloud-based communications services. He was also responsible for significant revenue and customer growth and investor returns at exTone Communications, ITXC Corporation, and Voxware.

 

Edward O’Donnell became our was appointed Chief Financial Officer effectiveon January 9, 2017. Mr. O’Donnell has over 23 years of experience in investment banking, advertising, private equity, investment, venture capital, technology, internet and other new media businesses. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. O’Donnell served as the Chief Financial Officer of Ameri Holdings, Inc. (OTC: AMRH) from January 2016 through December 2016. Mr. O’Donnell has served as the Chief Operating Officer of Radbourne Property Group, Inc., an innovative operator of family entertainment centers, where his primary responsibilities included raising capital, external reporting, outlining capital structure and budgeting. From February 2013 until April 2015, Mr. O’Donnell served as chief financial officer of AudioEye, Inc. (OTC: AEYE) From December 2010 until January 2013, Mr. O’Donnell served as Vice President of Finance for Augme Technologies, Inc. (Previously OTC: AUGT), which provides strategic services and mobile marketing technology to leading consumer and healthcare brands. From January 2007 until November 2010, Mr. O’Donnell served as Chief Financial Officer of Carlyle Capital Group LLC, a venture capital and private equity firm. Previously, Mr. O’Donnell also served as Senior Vice President of Finance & Investor Relations of ACTV, Inc. (previously NASDAQ: IATV), where he developed the investor relations department before the company was purchased by OpenTV, a subsidiary of Liberty Media. Previously, Mr. O’Donnell was a member of Aloysius Lyons, LLC. Aloysius Lyons, LLC filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the federal bankruptcy laws in 2007. Aloysius Lyons, LLC received a discharge relating to the matter in 2009 and has been dissolved. Mr. O’Donnell is a Certified Public Accountant in New York and a member of NYSSCPAs and AICPA. Mr. O’Donnell earned a B.S, degree in Accountancy from Villanova University in 1991 and an M.B.A. from Columbia Business School in 2003. We believe that Mr. O’Donnell’s extensive education and background in accounting and finance makes him qualified to serve as our Chief Financial Officer.

 

Erik KlootsDenis McCarthy was appointed President on October 1, 2018 and joined Pareteum January 1, 2018 as Principal Accounting Officer, effective April 1, 2016.SVP of Corporate Development. From 2014 through 2017, Mr. McCarthy was Senior Vice President of Operations and Finance at Mosaic Networx Inc., which delivers cloud-based data and telephony services to enterprises, where he handled all aspects of finance, systems integration, human resources and strategic relationships including merger and acquisition activity. From 2011 through 2013, Mr. McCarthy was Senior Vice President of Finance with United Brands Product Design. Prior to that, Mr. McCarthy was CFO of AP Telecom, a global sales channel manager for Undersea Cable Installations. He was CFO and COO of Pac-West Telecomm, a provider of next generation VoIP solutions for enterprise and communications services providers, which includes Telastic, a division of PacWest that developed cutting edge cloud-based telephony, billing and support systems. Mr. McCarthy began his appointment, Mr. Kloots was employed as the Company’s European Business Controllercareer and then as the Company’s Global Director of Corporate Control & Finance, reporting directly to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer since January 1, 2007. In these roles, Mr. Kloots has been fully accountable for the Global Corporate Control and Finance department of the Company, preparing group budget and strategic plans, quarterly rolling forecasts, SEC filings and investor presentations. Prior to working at the Company, Mr. Kloots worked as Business Controller for eighteenspent nearly ten years in Martinair Holland N.V.,public accounting, providing assurance and advisory services in the high technology and software industry, including telecommunications and bio-tech companies both at Arthur Andersen and RSM. He holds a well-known Dutch airline company. At Martinair, Mr. Kloots was, as the business controllerBachelor of the CargoScience in Business Unit, responsible for the planning & control-cycle (strategic planning), preparing financial reportingAdministration and analysis, designa Master of the control framework involving the introduction of Business Balanced Scorecard, among other responsibilities. Mr. Kloots studied Business Economics at the Hogeschool voor Economische Studies (HES),Science in Amsterdam and for Corporate Controller at the Financiele Academie in Den Bosch.Administration from Bryant University.

Alexander Korffwas appointed General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer effective April 1, 2016. Mr Korff oversees the legal affairs of the group, including corporate, commercial and financial transactions, intellectual property, governance and regulatory compliance. Before joining Pareteum, Mr Korff worked at international law firms Clifford Chance (in their London, Amsterdam and Warsaw offices) and Bird & Bird in London, specializing in contentious and non-contentious commercial, IT and intellectual property law – predominantly for technology- and telecom-sector clients. He has also worked as in-house legal counsel to defense and aviation group EADS Airbus at their European headquarters in France. He previously held commercial posts with technology companies WorldPay and Autonomy. Mr Korff read law (LL.B) at Durham University, England, and undertook post-graduate legal studies at the London College of Law. He speaks English, Dutch, German and French.

79

 

None of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any legal proceeding enumerated in Regulation S-K Item 401 within the time periods described in that regulation.

 


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Committees

 

Our Board of Directors has established three standing committees: (1) Audit and Finance, (2) Nominating and Corporate Governance, and (3) Compensation.

 

All committees operate under a charter that has been approved by the Board of Directors and which is available on our website, www.pareteum.com.

 

Audit and Finance Committee

 

Our Board of Directors has an Audit and Finance Committee, abbreviated to Audit Committee, composed of Messrs. de Greef (Chairman and member since September 23, 2015), Skaff (member since February 18, 2016), van Sante (member since February 18, 2016) and Jimenez-Tuñon (member since March 1, 2017) and Mr. Lippert (Chairman since November 16, 2018). Ms. Thomas (member since July 25, 2017), resigned from the Board and the Audit Committee as Chairwoman effective November 16, 2018). Mr. Lippert serves as the Audit and Finance Committee financial expert. The Audit and Finance Committee met four (4) times during 2016.2018 and acted by unanimous written consent four times in 2018. Each of the then-current members was present at all of the Audit and Finance Committee meetings held during 2016.2018.

 

The Audit Committee oversees our corporate accounting, financial reporting practices and the audits of financial statements. For this purpose, the Audit and Finance Committee has a charter (which is reviewed annually) and performs several functions. The Audit and Finance Committee:

 

·evaluates the independence and performance of, and assesses the qualifications of, our independent auditor, and engages such independent auditor;

 

·approves the plan and fees for the annual audit, quarterly reviews, tax and other audit-related services, and approves in advance any non-audit service to be provided by the independent auditor;

 

·reviews and approves related-party transactions;

 

·monitors the independence of the independent auditor and the rotation of partners of the independent auditor on our engagement team as required by law;

 

·reviews the financial statements to be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and reviews with management and the independent auditors the results of the annual audit and reviews of our quarterly financial statements;

 

·oversees all aspects our systems of internal accounting control and corporate governance functions on behalf of the Board of Directors; and

 

·provides oversight assistance in connection with legal, ethical and risk management compliance programs established by management and the Board of Directors, including Sarbanes-Oxley implementation, and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding corporate governance issues and policy decisions.

 

80

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

 

Our Board of Directors has a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, abbreviated to Nominating Committee, presently composed of Messrs. van Sante (Chairman. Member since December 16, 2015), de Greef (member since September 23, 2015), Skaff (member(Chairman and member since December 16, 2015) and Jimenez-Tuñon (member since March 1, 2017) and Mr. Lippert (member since November 16, 2018). Ms. Thomas (member since July 25, 2017) resigned from the Board and the Nominating Committee effective November 16, 2018. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee did not convene as such during 2016, preferring the affairsa meeting in 2018, but acted by unanimous written consent one time in 2018. Each of the then-committee members was present at all of the Compensation Committee to be addressed by the full Board. meetings held during 2018.

 

The Nominating Committee is charged with the responsibility of reviewing our corporate governance policies and with presenting new potential director-nominees to the Board of Directors for consideration. The Nominating Committee has a charter which is reviewed annually. All members of the Nominating Committee are independent directors as defined by the rules of the NYSE MKT.Exchange. The Nominating Committee will consider director nominees recommended by stockholders. To recommend a nominee, please write to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o the General Counsel,Company Secretary, Pareteum Corporation, 100 Park1185 Avenue Suite 1600,of the Americas, 37th Floor, New York, City, NY 10017, USA.10036. The Nominating Committee will assess all director nominees using the same criteria it applies generally, described in this Form 10-K under the heading “Director and Officer Qualifications.” During 2016,2017, we did not pay any fees to any third parties to assist in the identification of nominees.

 


Compensation Committee

 

Our Board of Directors also has a Compensation Committee composed of Messrs. Skaff (Chairman)Mr. Jimenez-Tuñon (Chairman, since July 25, 2017), de Greef,Mr. van Sante and van Sante. Before DecemberMr. Lippert (member since November 16, 2015,2018). Ms. Thomas (member since July 25, 2017) resigned from the Compensation Committee was composed of Messrs. Bustillo, Stevens, De Greef and Ros.effective November 16, 2018. The Compensation Committee reviews or recommends the compensation arrangements for our management and employees and also assists the Board of Directors in reviewing and approving matters such as Company benefit and insurance plans. The Compensation Committee met two (2) timesdid not meet during 2016 and2018 but acted by Unanimous Written Consent one (1) timeunanimous written consent four times in 2016. Each of the then-committee members was present at all of the Compensation Committee meetings held during 2016.2018.

 

The Compensation Committee has the authority to directly engage, at the Company’s expense, any compensation consultants or other advisers as it deems necessary to carry out its responsibilities in determining the amount and form of employee, executive and director compensation. In 2016,2018, the Compensation Committee did not engage any such compensation consultants or advisers.

Director and Officer Qualifications

 

We have not formally established any specific, minimum qualifications that must be met by each of our officers or directors or specific qualities or skills that are necessary for one or more of our officers or members of the Board of Directors to possess. However, our Nominating Committee generally evaluates and recommends candidates with a focus on the following qualities: educational background, diversity of professional experience, knowledge of our industry and business, integrity, professional reputation, independence, wisdom and ability to represent the best interests of our stockholders and other stakeholders.

 

Our Board of Directors and officers are composed of a diverse group of leaders. In their prior positions they have gained experience in core management skills, such as strategic and financial planning, public company financial reporting, compliance, risk management and leadership development. Most of our officers and directors also have experience serving on boards of directors and board committees of other public companies or private companies, and have an understanding of corporate governance practices and trends, which provides an understanding of different business processes, challenges and strategies.

 

Attendance at Board, Committee and Stockholder Meetings

 

Our Board of Directors met in person and telephonically fourteen (14)9 times during 20162018 and also approved Board resolutions or acted by unanimous written consent eleven (11)24 times. Each of the then-members of our Board of Directors was present at 75% or more of the Board of Directors meetings held in 2016.2018.

 

In 2016, Mr. Turner and Mr. De Greef attended the annual stockholder meeting. We have encouraged, but do not require, that all of our directors be in attendance at the Annual Meetingour annual shareholder meeting either in person or by remote communication. In addition, we have encouraged, but do not require, our directors to attend future2018, Mr. Turner, via teleconference, attended the annual stockholder meetings in person.meeting.

 

81

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires that our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock (referred to herein as the “reporting persons”) file with the SEC various reports as to their ownership of and activities relating to our common stock. Such reporting persons are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely upon a review of copies of Section 16(a) reports and representations received by us from reporting persons, and without conducting any independent investigation of our own, in 2016,2017, there werewas one (1) untimely filingsfiling of Formsa Form 3, 4 and 5 as outlined herein, specifically: (i) one report on Form 4 covering one transaction filed by Mark Nije; (ii) four reports on Form 4 covering four transactions filed by Patrick M. Carroll; (iii) one report on Form 4 covering one transaction filed by Martin Zuuriber; (iv) one report on Form 4 covering one transaction filed by Jaime Bustillo Velasco, (v) two reports on Form 4 covering two transactions filed by Roderick de Greef; (vi) one report on Form 4 covering one transaction filed by Robert Skaff Jr; (vii) two reports on Form 4 covering two transactions filed by Francisco Ros; (vii) three reports on Form 4 covering three transactions filed by Yves Roger van Sante; (viii) two reports on Form 4 covering two transactions filed by Gary G. Brandt; (ix) one report on Form 4 covering one transaction filed by Robert Harold Turner, and (x) one report on Form 3 covering one transaction filed by Victor Bozzo.and/or 5: Edward O’Donnell (Form 4).

 

Code of Conduct

 

We have adopted a code of conduct that outlines the principles, policies and laws that govern our activities and establishes guidelines for conduct in the workplace. The code of conduct applies to all employees, as well as each member of our Board of Directors. All employees are required to read the code of conduct and affirm in writing their acceptance of the code. Our code of conduct is posted on our website, www.pareteum.com. We intend to satisfy any disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our code of conduct by posting such information on our website, www.pareteum.com. A copy of our code of conduct is also available in print, without charge, upon written request to Pareteum Corporation, 100 Park1185 Avenue Suite 1600,of the Americas, 37th Floor, New York, NY 10017, USA.10036, Attn: General Counsel.Corporate Secretary.


Item 11. Executive Compensation

 

Summary Compensation TableSUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Name and principle
position
 Year Salary ($)(1)  Bonus ($)  Option
Awards
($)(2)
 Option
Awards (in
options)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
  Total ($) Total
Number
of shares
 Total
Number
of options
Robert H. Turner (i)  2016 $331,021(a) $675,000(f)  $530,838  200,000(h) $257,785  $1,794,644   86,000 200,000
(Executive Chairman)  2015 $40,628(a) $   661,437  100,000(j) $-  $702,065              - 100,000
Victor Bozzo (ii)  2016 $54,457(b) $50,000(g) $394,213  120,000(k)  $-  $498,671              - 120,000
(CEO & Chief Executive Officer)  2015 $-(b) $-  $   -  $-  $-              - -
Alex Korff (iii)  2016 $153,676(c) $   $-  -(l) $186,870  $340,546 49,807 -
(General Counsel, Secretary & Compliance Officer)  2015 $125,349(c)  $   $15,656  1,500  $(9,029) $131,975       - -
Edward O’Donnell (iv)  2016 $-(d) $   $-  -(l) $-  $-              - -
(Chief Financial Officer)  2015 $-(d) $   $-  -(l) $-  $-              - -
Erik Kloots (v)  2016 $139,925(e) $   $-  -(l) $134,262  $274,186 44,791 -
(Vice President-Finance and Principal Accounting Officer)  2015 $119,253(e) $   $15,656  1,500(l) $-  $134,909              - -

82

Name and
principal
position
 Year  Salary ($)(1)  Bonus ($) Bonus
Stock
Awards (in $)
  Bonus
Stock
Awards (in
shares)
  Option
Awards
($)(2)
  Option
Awards (in
options)
  Stock
Awards
($)(1)
 Stock
Awards
(in
shares)
  All Other
Compensation ($)
 Total ($) Total
Number
of shares
 Total
Number of
options
Robert H. Turner *  2018  $321,225(a)   $600,000(f) $2,921,563   1,375,000(i) $-   -    $               $1,439,055(o) $5,281,843 1,375,000 -
(Executive Chairman)  2017  $326,044    $300,000  $1,605,965   1,196,436  $265,520   100,000  $         $     $2,497,529 1,196,436 100,000
Victor Bozzo  2018  $293,162(b)   $325,000(g) $687,788   306,943(j) $460,064   500,000(l) $           $395,521(p) $2,161,536 306,943 500,000
(Chief Executive Officer)  2017  $307,063    $83,500  $352,513   330,555  $-   -  $         $     $743,076 330,555 -
Alex Korff  2018  $134,319(c)   $-  $304,581   208,329(k) $-   -  $           $-  $438,900 208,329 -
(General Counsel, Secretary & Compliance Officer)  2017  $208,164        $224,249   108,333  $24,389   20,000  $         $     $456,802 108,333 20,000
Edward O'Donnell  2018  $212,197(d)   $60,000(h) $-   -  $151,397   100,000(m) $           $14,354(q) $437,948 - 100,000
(Chief Financial Officer)  2017  $209,388  $     $2,915   1,000  $220,201   290,000  $         $     $432,504 1,000 290,000
Denis McCarthy  2018  $198,509(e)   $-  $-   -  $138,021   150,000(n) $           $17,662(q) $354,192 - 150,000
(President)  2017  $-    $-  $-   -  $-   -  $         $     $- - -

 

Notes:

 

 (i)Mr. Turner was appointed on November 16, 2015, compensation received in 2015 was pro-rated.2015.

 

 (ii)Mr. Bozzo was appointed on November 1, 2016, compensation received in 2016 was pro-rated.2016.

 

 (iii)Mr. Korff was appointed on April, 1, 2016 and replacing2016. Effective December 1, 2017, Mr. A. Vermeulen who left theKorff transitioned from General Counsel to Company March 31, 2016.Secretary.

 

 (iv)Mr. O’Donnell was appointed January 8, 2017, compensation to be received in 2017 will bewas pro-rated.

 (v)Mr. KlootsMcCarthy was appointed AprilJanuary 1, 2016 compensation received in 2016 was pro-rated.2018, increase of salary implemented as per October 1, 2018.

 

(1)These are the base salaries before any bonus and or non-cash awards. The base salary is determined and paid on a monthly basis in euros, therefore, calculations include exchange results from euros to U.S. dollars. Payment can be elected either in cash or in shares in lieu of salary and bonus. When officers opt for payment in shares there is a 25% discount on the purchase price. The amounts, however, are shown at fair market value by using the share price of the preceding month closing price. In principle, officers may earn up to approximately 33% more than the ‘agreed’ cash salary in the event they elect to receive 100% compensation in shares. Such beneficial discount is included in “All Other Compensation” at the fair market value of the equity, reduced by the denominated value in U.S. dollars of the cash salary used for this ‘exchange’ into non-cash compensation.

(2)The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock option awards granted to the named executive officers in 2016 and 2015, respectively. We estimate the fair value of awards on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions made in calculating the grant date fair value amounts for stock option awards are incorporated herein by reference to the discussion of those assumptions in Note 23 to the financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. Note that the amounts reported in this column reflect the Company’s accounting cost for the stock option awards, and do not correspond to the actual economic value that will be received by the named executive officers from the award. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts in this column exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. In case the options have not vested yet the company has expensed a pro-rata portion until date of vesting. Expensing of performance based options will start after setting the performance targets.

(3)With respect to 2016 this value relates to the non-cash bonus for the chairman of the board  and other officers granted in 2016 and issued in January 2017 and in case of 2015 the value represents the 25% purchase price discount the named executive officer received by way of electing equity compensation in lieu of cash compensation adjusted for fair value at date of issuance.

(a)These amounts have been agreed in USD and amounts to an annual amount of USD 300,000. The total salary in 20162018 amounts to $331,021$321,225 which includes the employer part of the social securities.

 
(b)These amounts have been agreed in USD and amounts to an annual amount of USD 275,000. The total salary in 20162018 amounts to $54,457$293,162 which includes the employer part of the social securities and represents salary as of November 1, 2016.staff allowances.

 
(c)These amounts have been agreed in GBP. The amount for 20162018 has been agreed upon GBP 110,700.100,000. The average exchange rate is $1.388 for 2016 and $1.440$1.3432 in 2015.2018. These averages are the average of the 4 exchange rates used during the respective year by using the exchange rate of the first working day of each quarter.

 
(d)NoThese amounts have been agreed in USD and amounts to an annual amount of USD 200,000. The total salary in 2015 and 2016, started in January 2016.2018 amounts to $212,197 which includes the employer part of the social securities.

 
(e)These amounts have been agreed in euro. Amount for 2016 has been EUR 108,230USD and for 2015 EUR 96,006.started with an annual amount of USD 175,000, which was increased as of Q4-2018 to an annual amount of $225,000. The average exchange rate is $1.114 for 2016 and $1.133 for 2015. These averages aretotal salary in 2018 amounts to $198,509 which includes the averageemployer part of the 4 exchange rates used during the respective year by using the exchange rate of the first working day of each quarter.social securities.

 


(x)These amounts have been agreed in EUR and amounts to an annual amount of €240,000. The 2018 salary only represent 3 months, the officer uses a consultancy construction for his compensation and is paid by one of the subsidiaries. Options are granted by Headquarter office and the award value represent the expensing during 2018 for the Black-Scholes value during the time until vesting of the award.
 83 

(f)2017 Bonus amount granted for an amount of USD 75,000 based on achievement$600,000 which was equally paid through the twelve months of certain milestone.2018.
(g)2017 Bonus granted for an amount of $600,000$325,000 which was equally paid through the twelve months of 2018.
(h)2017 Bonus granted for an amount of $60,000 which was equally paid through the twelve months of 2018.
(i)Comprised of 375,000 shares being the remainder of a 1,500,000 Restricted Stock Award granted November 17, 2017 and accrued in1,000,000 shares being part of the fourth quarter to2017 Performance Equity Grant (granted September 29, 2018 totaling 2,000,000 shares), as of December 2018, 1,000,000 shares will be paid in the future.vesting and delivered during 2019.

 

(j)(g)Sign-in bonus for an amountComprised of USD 50,000.306,943 shares being the remainder of a 850,000 Restricted Stock Award granted November 17, 2017. As of December 2018, 236,113 shares will be vesting and delivered during 2019.

 

(h)(k)Comprised of 200,000 shares being the remainder of a total grant200,000 Restricted Stock Award granted November 17, 2017 and an accidental excess delivery of 300,0008,329 shares which are in total divided between  the years 2016 and 2017, the 200,000 options which have been granted with immediate effect represent an initial fair market value of $530,838, following the Black and Scholes calculation method.a process to be returned.

 (j)
(l)Comprised500,000 options granted May 10, 2018 with a Black-Scholes value of 100,000$935,921, options withhave an exercise price of $8.25$2.49 and will start vesting at February 5, 2019 for 1/3 and will be followed by 24 equal subsequent monthly vestings.
(m)100,000 options granted May 10, 2018 with a total initial fairBlack-Scholes value of USD 661,437. In the years 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 equal tranches of 25,000$187,184, options will vest each year.

(k)Comprised of 120,000 options withhave an exercise price of $4.3725$2.49 and will start vesting at February 5, 2019 for 1/3 and will be followed by 24 equal subsequent monthly vestings.
(n)Comprised of two options agreements totaling to 150,000 options granted May 10, 2018 with a total initial fair marketBlack-Scholes value of USD 394,213 using the Black$280,776, options have an exercise price of $2.49 and Scholes valuation model. The options will annually vest in 4 equal tranches of 30,000 optionsstart vesting at February 5, 2019 for 1/3 and have a term of 7 years. The first tranche vested in 2016, others will vest in 2017, 2018 and 2019. Expensing will be accountedfollowed by 24 equal subsequent monthly vestings.
(o)Result of an agreement between Mr. Turner and the company that the company will pay for the taxes levied on the stock-based compensation granted
(p)Comprised of an amount of $370,786 as a result of an agreement between Mr. Bozzo and spread over the period until vesting.company that the company will pay for the taxes levied on the stock-based compensation granted and an amount of $24,736 for Other Staff Allowances.
(q)Relating to Other Staff Allowances.

 

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table

Consultancy and Employment Agreements

 

We currently have the following agreements with our named executive officers:

 

Robert H. Turner, Executive Chairman – We entered into ana letter of employment, agreement, effective as of November 17, 2015, with Mr. Turner, to serve as Executive Chairman of the Company. MrMr. Turner is paid a base compensation of USD $300,000 gross per year. Mr. Turner receives no fees (cash or stock) for serving on our Board of Directors. Mr. Turner has a number of granted options set at 2,500,000 carrying a 7 years exercise period after granting; the options would vest in four equal annual installments, following the joining date. Mr. Turner is eligible to a performance related bonus, depending on business performance by the Group performance. Such bonus shall be based solely upon your achievement of Board-approved and mutually agreed upon performance targets. For 2016 the on-target bonus percentage is set at 100% against the Base salary paid in that year, capped at 200% maximum on cash payment; performance over and above 200% is paid in equity at the then-current value of the Company.

 

Additionally, Onon November 18, 2016, the Company entered into ana new employment agreement with Mr. Turner, the Company’s Executive Chairman and Principal Executive Officer (the “Employment Agreement”).Turner. The Employment Agreementemployment agreement modifies and supplements the terms of the prior employment letter between the Company and Mr. Turner dated November 2015 by providing for the following additional terms: (i) one-time bonuses of USD $300,000 for achieving previously determined business and restructuring goals established by the Board and an extraordinary bonus of USD $300,000 for Mr. Turner’s efforts on behalf of the Company during late 2015 and 2016 and to be paid as set forth in the Employment Agreement;employment agreement; (ii) restricted common stock grants of 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock; (iii) options to purchase up to 7,500,000 shares of the Company’s stock, which options shall vest over a period of three (3) calendar years, with 1,875,000 shares vesting immediately, and the remaining 5,625,000 shares vesting in 3 equal installments of 1,875,000 each, on the first, second and third anniversary of the option grant. The exercise price of the options is $.14 per share; and (iv) other customary allowances, bonuses, reimbursements and vacation pay. The Employment Agreementemployment agreement also provides that if Mr. Turner’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Turner for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the Employment Agreement)employment agreement) the Company will pay Mr. Turner, 12 months’ salary at the rate of his salary as of such termination, together with payment of the average earned bonuses (regular and extraordinary) since November 1, 2015.

 

84


Victor Bozzo, Chief Executive Officer– We entered into an employment agreement, effective as of November 1, 2016, with Mr. Bozzo, to server as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Bozzo is paid a base compensation of USD $275,000 gross per year. Mr. Bozzo received a signing bonus of USD $50,000 gross and has a total number of restricted common stock grants of shares with the equivalent value of USD $10,000. Additionally, Mr. Bozzo received a restricted grant with the equivalent value of USD $15,000 within a reasonable time following the 6-month anniversary of the Effective Dateeffective date and USD $50,000 within the first calendar year anniversary date, with each of these grants being subject to certain conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement.employment agreement. Additionally, Mr. Bozzo is entitled to purchase options up to 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, of which options to purchase 750,000 shares of common stock will vest immediately, and the remaining 2,250,000 shares shall vest in 3 installments of 750,000 each annually on the first, second and third anniversary of the option grant. The exercise price of the options is $.1749 per share; andshare. Mr. Bozzo also received other customary allowances, bonuses, reimbursements and vacation pay. The Employment Agreementemployment agreement also provides that if Mr. Bozzo’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Bozzo for “good reason” the Company will pay Mr. Bozzo 12 months’ salary at the rate of his salary as of such termination. Mr. Bozzo is also subject to customary non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality requirements during and after the term of his employment.

 

Denis McCarthy, President – Mr. McCarthy joined the Company as of January 1, 2018 in the capacity of SVP of Corporate Development. We then entered an employment agreement as of October 1, 2018, with Mr. McCarthy, to serve as President of the Company, for the purpose of expanding Mr. McCarthy’s responsibilities with the Company during his continued term of employment. Mr. McCarthy is paid a base compensation of USD $225,000 gross per year. Mr. McCarthy is eligible to receive an annual bonus of up to 100% of the amount of his gross base salary, subject to the achievement of certain business-plan targets. Mr. McCarthy is also entitled to other customary allowances, bonuses, reimbursements for certain expenses and vacation pay. The agreement is an “at-will” agreement, and also provides that if Mr. McCarthy is terminated by the Company, then, subject to a mutual release, the Company will pay to Mr. McCarthy his base salary for an additional 12 months after termination in accordance with customary payroll practices. Mr. McCarthy is subject to the Company’s customary confidentiality requirements consummate with his position during and after his term of employment.

Edward O’Donnell, Chief Financial Officer – The Company entered into an employment agreement, effective as of January 9, 2017 with Mr. O’Donnell, to perform as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. O’Donnell is paid a base compensation of USD $175,000$200,000 gross and is entitled to an annual bonus of up to USD $75,000 gross. Additionally, Mr. O’Donnell received a signing bonus of 25,0001,000 restricted common shares, and options to purchase up to 1,000,000250,000 shares of the Company’s stock, subject to the Company’s employee stock option plan including restrictions and vesting schedule. Mr. O’Donnell is also entitled to other customary allowances, bonuses, reimbursements and vacation pay. The employment agreement between the Company and Mr. O’Donnell is an “at will” agreement, which also provides that if Mr. O’Donnell’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company, then, subject to a mutual release, the Company will pay Mr. O’Donnell’s base salary for an additional 270 days after termination in accordance with customary payroll practices. Mr. O’Donnell is also subject to customary confidentiality requirements during and after the term of his employment.

 

Alexander Korff, Former General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer During 2016, the Company’s Swiss subsidiary and Mr. Korff were parties to a consultancy agreement with his consulting company Karkinos IP Consulting Ltd which was paid approximately GBP 110,700 in 2016. Effective February 2017, Mr. Korff was engaged as an employee of the Company under an employment agreement for a total of GBP 120,000£120,000 (USD $149,383) gross per annum. Additionally, Mr. Korff received options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s stock, subject to the Company’s employee stock option plan including restrictions and vesting schedule. Additionally, MrMr. Korff will also be eligible for a bonus of up to fifty percent (50%) of his base salary above, where any such bonus is subject to the Company’s achievement of its business plan targets. Mr. Korff is also entitled to other customary allowances, bonuses, reimbursements and vacation pay. The employment agreement between the Company andEffective December 1, 2017, Mr. Korff is an “at will” agreement, which also provides that if Mr. Korff’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company, then, subject to a mutual release, the Company will pay Mr. Korff’s base salary for an additional 180 days after termination in accordance with customary payroll practices. Mr. Korff is also subject to customary confidentiality requirements duringresigned from his position as General Counsel and after the term of his employment.

Erik Kloots, Principal Accounting Officer – The Company entered into an employment agreement, effective as of January 1, 2007 with Mr. Kloots to serve as the Company's European Business Controller and then as the Company's Global Director of Corporate Control & Finance, reporting directly to the Company's Chief FinancialCompliance Officer. On April 1, 2016, Mr. Kloots was appointed as Principal Accounting Officer and paid a base compensation of Euro 121,289.41 (USD $137,728). Mr. Kloots is also entitled to other customary allowances, bonuses, reimbursements and vacation pay. Mr. Kloots is also subject to customary confidentiality requirements during and after the term of his employment. Effective as of March 31, 2017, Erik Kloots, will resign from the Company as its Principal Accounting Officer. The Company has an agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Mr. Kloots to (i) make a lump sum severance payment of gross Euro 121,289.41 (USD $129,746) gross no later than March 31, 2017, (ii) pay all unused holidays and pro-rata calculations of 2016 holiday allowance, (iii) keep the Company laptop, and (iv) keep all past awarded stock-options through the life of the options. Mr. Kloots will not resign as a result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company's operations, policies or practices. 

85

 

Severance and Change of Control

 

The named executive officers (and certain former executive officers) have individual severance terms as described below. In addition, outstanding equity awards made to our named executive officers under the 2008 Plan and 2017 Plan are subject to acceleration of any unvested portion of such awards upon a change of control unless the terms of a particular award state otherwise.

 


Other than as set out below, none of the agreements with named executives include any provisions for severance benefits or other payments upon a change of control regardless of whether a named executive officer’s employment is terminated by him with or without good reason, or whether the named executive officer is terminated by the Company with or without cause.

 

Robert H. Turner - The employment agreement with Mr. Turner is for an indefinite term. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Turner is entitled to severance if Mr. Turner’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Turner for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the Employment Agreement)employment agreement) the Company will pay Mr. Turner, 12 months’ salary at the rate of his salary as of such termination, together with payment of the average earned bonuses (regular and extraordinary) since November 1, 2015.

Victor Bozzo – The employment agreement with Mr. Bozzo is for an indefinite term. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Bozzo is entitled to a severance if he is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Bozzo for “good reason” the Company will pay Mr. Bozzo 12 months’ salary at the rate of his salary as of such termination.

 

Denis McCarthy – The employment agreement with Mr. McCarthy is for an indefinite term. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. McCarthy is entitled to a severance if he is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. McCarthy for “good reason” the Company will pay to Mr. McCarthy 12 months’ salary at the rate of his salary as of such termination.

Edward O’Donnell – The employment agreement with Mr. O’Donnell is for an indefinite term. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. O’Donnell is entitled to a severance if he is terminated by the Company, then, subject to a mutual release, the Company will pay Mr. O’Donnell’s base salary for an additional 270 days after termination in accordance with customary payroll practices.

 

Alexander Korff – The employment agreement entered on February 1, 2017 with Mr. Korff iswas for an indefinite term. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Korff iswas entitled to a severance if he is terminated by the Company, then, subject to a mutual release, the Company willwould pay Mr. Korff’s base salary for an additional 180 days after termination in accordance with customary payroll practices. Effective December 1, 2017, Mr. Korff resigned from his position as General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer.

 

Erik Kloots – The employment agreement with Mr. Kloots is for an indefinite term. Under the terms of an additional agreement with the Board of Directors on December 15, 2016, Mr. Kloots is entitled to severance if he is terminated by the Company without cause. In the event the agreement were terminated by the Company without cause, the Company would be required to pay Mr. Kloots severance in cash equal to six (6) months base-salary in addition to accrued but unpaid compensation and accrued vacation. Mr. Kloots has an agreement with the Company to resign from all positions that he holds with the Company as of March 31, 2017. For a more detailed description, see Item 9B, “Other Information.”GRANT OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

 

Martin Zuurbier - The consultancy agreement with Mr. Zuurbier was for a term of two (2) years and three (3) months and commenced on January, 1 2015 and was due to end on March 31, 2017. On January 29, 2016, Mr. Martin Zuurbier entered into certain Severance and Independent Contractor Agreement pursuant to which Mr. Zuurbier resigned, effective December 31, 2015, from the Chief Technology Officer and Co-President of Mobile Platform Activities and other executive positions of the Company for personal reasons. Mr. Zuurbier did not resign as a result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company's operations, policies or practices. In connection with his severance, Mr. Zuurbier received (i) a severance entitlement of Euro 100,000 (USD $109,096) and (ii) a grant of 500,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. On November 14, 2016, Mr. Zuurbier and the Company entered into an Equity Conversion and Settlement Agreement, in which both parties agreed that the Company would issue to Mr. Zuuriber the total of 1,115,000 shares of common stock that were included in the S-3, in order to settle an outstanding balance for the total of 115,00. Further, it was agreed between the Company and Mr.. Zuurbier that the Company would also pay in cash the total of Euro 19,500 (USD $21,274) before December 2, 2016 towards the outstanding liability, and the Company would also pay the remaining payment of Euro 50,000 (USD $54,548) before March 31, 2017 to settle the payment liabilities as prescribed by the Severance and Independent Contractor Agreement.

86

Mark Nije - The consultancy agreement with Mr. Nije was for a term of three (3) years which commenced on January 1, 2015. Under the terms of the consultancy agreement, Mr. Nije is entitled to severance if he is terminated by the Company without cause. In the event the agreement were terminated by the Company without cause, the Company would be required to give two (2) month’s written notice of termination and pay Mr. Nije severance in cash equal to four (4) months base-salary in addition to accrued but unpaid compensation and accrued vacation, but only if, Mr. Nije and us execute a valid and comprehensive mutual release of any and all claims that they may have against us in a form provided by us and they executes such form within seven (7) days of tender. Mr. Nije has an agreement with the Company to resign from all positions that he holds with the Company as of March 31, 2016. For a more detailed description, see Item 9B, “Other Information”. Effective on December 20, 2016, Mr. Nije and the Company entered into an Amendment of the Severance Agreement, in which the Company agreed to make an initial cash payment to Mr. Nije of Euro 42,500 (USD $44,390) and beginning January 1, 2017 the Company shall pay to Mr. Nije the monthly amount of Euro 10,000 (USD $10,445) up to cover the total outstanding balance of Euro 338,407 (USD $353,459) including the accrued statutory interest. In the event the Company fails to pay timely the monthly invoiced amounts, the Company shall next to the monthly payment, without need of demand, make a penalty payment of in the amount of Euro 5,000 (USD $5,222), plus interests thereon for each failure. In the event that the Company is able to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or debt securities, from which the Company receives gross proceeds of not less than USD $3,000,000, the Company shall, within 14 days thereof, make a lump sum payment to Mr. Nije in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the then outstanding balance of the obligation. The then outstanding balance, including accumulated interest over the declining balance, is to be paid in equal monthly installments of no less than Euro 10,000 (USD $10,445) plus any amount due thereunder to satisfy any value added taxes per month until the Obligation is repaid in full. The Company shall arrange for the removal, at the Company’s sole expense, on or before December 29, 2016 (the “Removal Date”), of the trading restriction on the 692,785 shares of stock issued to the Mr. Nije and the 141,910 shares of stock issued to the Management Entity (collectively, the “Shares”), provided however that the Mr. Nije have complied with the applicable requirements under Rule 144 by the Removal Date and the required broker’s rep letter and seller’s rep letter are provided to counsel engaged for purposes of issuing the opinion relating to the removal of the trading restrictions on the Shares. Upon removal of such restrictions, the Company will be solely responsible for arranging for the electronic delivery of the certificates evidencing the Shares, without restrictions, manner of sale or direct resale requirements, to a broker designated by Mr. Nije. In the event that the Company fails to comply with the obligations set out in clause 2 prior to the Removal Date, the Company shall, without need of demand, make a penalty payment in the amount of Euro 25,000 (USD $26,112). The Company shall remove, on or before February 28, 2017, Mr. Nije as a statutory director from Elephant Talk Communications SLU, Spain, including the removal from the applicable registers at the chambers of commerce and tax authorities (the “Spain Removal”). In the event that the Company is unable to complete the Spain Removal by the date set forth above, the Company shall make a payment to Mr. Nije as penalty in the amount of Euro 10,000 (USD $10,455). The Company shall remove, on or before March 31, 2017, Mr. Nije as a statutory director from the all existing legal entities, including the removal from the applicable registers at the chambers of commerce and tax authorities. In the event that the Company is unable to complete the Removal by the date set forth above, the Company shall make a payment to M. Nije as penalty in the amount of Euro 5,000 (USD $5,222) for each entity Mr. Nije is still a registered statutory director.

Alex Vermeulen - The consultancy agreement with Mr. Vermeulen was for a term of three (3) years and commenced on January, 1 2015. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Vermeulen was entitled to severance if he is terminated by the Company without cause. In the event the agreement were terminated by the Company without cause, the Company would be required to give two (2) month’s written notice of termination and pay Mr. Vermeulen severance in cash equal to four (4) months base salary in addition to accrued but unpaid Compensation and accrued vacation, but only if, Mr. Vermeulen and the Company execute a valid and comprehensive mutual release of any and all claims that they may have against in a form provided by the Company and they executes such form within seven (7) days of tender. Mr. Vermeulen resigned from all positions that he held with the Company as of March 31, 2016. For a more detailed description, see Item 9B, “Other Information.” On October 20, 2016, it has been agreed to a settlement of liabilities between the Company and Mr. Vermeulen, and their respective officers and directors, under the severance agreement of March 28, 2016, and it was also agreed that the Company would issue to Mr. Vermeulen 600,000 restricted shares of common stock that would be included in the S-3 registration statement, in order to settle an outstanding balance for the amount of Euro 60,000 (USD $65,868). Further it is agreed that the Company would pay the remaining part of the outstanding debt in cash, being then Euro 24,857.14 (USD $27,288), before December 24, 2016.

87

Armin Hessler –The employment agreement with Mr. Hessler was for an indefinite term. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Hessler was entitled to severance if he were terminated by the Company without cause. In the event the agreement were terminated by the Company before July 1, 2017, the Company would be required to pay Mr. Hessler severance in cash equal to the greater of i) base salary for the number of months between the date Mr. Hessler employment terminates and July 1, 2017; or ii) six (6) months’ base salary. In the event the agreement is terminated by us after July 1, 2017, we would be required to pay Mr. Hessler severance in cash equal to six (6) months’ base salary. Mr. Hessler submitted his resignation as the Company’s Chief Operations Officer effective as of November 2, 2016. The Company has agreed to make monthly cash severance payments to Mr. Hessler for a period of nine months from the date of his resignation, equal to an aggregate gross amount of Euro 180,000 (USD $198,034). The Company has also agreed to allow Mr. Hessler to keep an aggregate of 2,200,000 vested stock options. Mr. Hessler did not resign as a result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices.

GRANT OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
    Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
 All
Other
Stock
Awards
:
  All
Other
Stock
Option
Awards
       
Name and principle
position
 Grant-
date
 Threshold
($)
 Target ($)  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
 Target (#)  Maximum
(#)
  Number
of
shares
of
Stocks
or Units
(#)
  :
Number
 of
Securities
Underlying
Options
 #
  Exercises
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(1)
 
Robert H. Turner 18-Nov-16                          200,000  $3.50  $530,838 
(Executive Chairman)                                      
Victor Bozzo 1-Nov-16                          120,000  $4,3725  $394,213 
(CEO & Chief Executive Officer)                                      
Alex Korff 8-Aug-16                      40,000   -  $-  $140,100 
(General Counsel, Secretary & Compliance Officer) 28-Jul-16                      9,807           36,336 
Erik Kloots 8-Aug-16                      40,000           140,100 
Vice President-Finance and Principal Accounting Officer 28-Jul-16                      4,791           17,751 
Edward O’Donnell                        -          $- 
(Chief Finance Officer)                        -          $- 

    Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
  All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of shares
  All Other
Stock
Option
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock and
 
Name and
principle
position
 Grant
date
 Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
  of Stocks
or Units
(#)
  Underlying
Options
#
  Option
Awards
($/Sh)
  Option
Awards
($)(1)
 
Robert H. Turner 17-Nov-17                                                    375,000                   $992,188 
(Executive Chairman) 29-Sep-18              1,000,000           1,000,000          $1,980,000 
  29-Sep-18                                     $1,690,000 
Victor Bozzo 17-Nov-17                          306,943          $736,663 
(CEO & Chief Executive Officer) 17-Nov-17              259,724                      $438,934 
  10-May-18                              500,000  $2.49  $935,921 
Alex Korff 17-Nov-17                          208,329          $540,823 
(General Counsel, Secretary & Compliance Officer)                                          
Edward O’Donnell 8-Jan-17                              250,000  $1.0000  $121,806 
(Chief Financial Officer) 10-May-18                              100,000  $2.4900  $187,184 
Denis McCarthy 10-May-18                              50,000  $2.4900  $93,592 
  10-May-18                              100,000  $2.4900  $187,184 
Bart Weijermars 17-Oct-18                              138,655  $3.0400  $189,344 
(CEO EMEA)                                          

 

The Company issued the compensation shares to the above executive officers from the shares authorized under its Amended2017 Plan and Restated 2008 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (“2008 Plan”). 2018 Plan.

88

 


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

 

The following table discloses information regarding outstanding equity awards granted or accrued as of December 31, 20162018 for each of our named executive officers.

Outstanding Equity Awards
  Option Awards  Stock Awards
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock that
have not
Vested (#)
  Market Value of
Shares or Units
of Stock that
have not
Vested ($)
 
Robert H. Turner                1,000,000(a) $1,690,000 
(Executive Chairman)                      
                       
Victor Bozzo      500,000(1) $2.4900  5-Feb-22        
(CEO & Chief Executive Officer)                236,113(b) $399,031 
                       
Alex Korff                      
(General Counsel, Secretary & Compliance Officer)                      
                       
Edward O'Donnell  159,717(2)     $1.0000  7-Jan-20        
(Chief Financial Officer)      90,283(2) $1.0000  7-Jan-20        
       100,000(1) $2.4900  5-Feb-22        
                       
Denis McCarthy      50,000(1) $2.4900  5-Feb-22        
       100,000(1) $2.4900  5-Feb-22        

 

Outstanding Equity Awards
  Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
have not
Vested (#)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
have not
Vested ($)
 
Robert H. Turner  25,000(1)     $8.25  16-Nov-22     $  
(Executive Chairman)  25,000(1)     $8.25  16-Nov-22     $  
       25,000(2) $8.25  16-Nov-22     $  
       25,000(2) $8.25  16-Nov-22     $  
   50,000      $3.50  18-Nov-23     $  
       50,000  $3.50  18-Nov-23     $  
       50,000  $3.50  18-Nov-23     $  
       50,000  $3.50  18-Nov-23     $  
                       
Victor Bozzo  30,000      $4,3725  1-Nov-23     $  
(CEO & Chief Executive Officer)      30,000  $4,3725  1-Nov-23     $  
       30,000  $4,3725  1-Nov-23     $  
       30,000  $4,3725  1-Nov-23     $  
                       
Alex Korff  1,000      $62.50  1-Jan-21     $  
(General Counsel, Secretary & Compliance Officer)  1,000      $62.50  1-Jan-21     $  
   1,000      $62.50  1-Jan-21     $  
   500      $28.75  15-Jan-17     $  
   500      $28.75  15-Jan-17     $  
   500      $28.75  15-Jan-17     $  
   500      $38.00  15-Jan-18     $  
   500      $38.00  15-Jan-18     $  
       500  $38.00  15-Jan-18     $  
   3,072      $22.00  15-Apr-17     $  
   500      $20.50  16-Jan-19     $  
       500  $20.50  16-Jan-19     $  
       500  $20.50  16-Jan-19     $  
                       
Edward O’Donnell         $         $  
(Chief Finance Officer)         $         $  
                       
Erik Kloots  1,000      $33.75  1-Jan-20     $  
(Vice President-Finance and Principal Accounting Officer)  1,000      $33.75  1-Jan-20     $  
   1,000      $62.50  1-Jan-21     $  
   1,000      $62.50  1-Jan-21     $  
   1,000      $62.50  1-Jan-21     $  
   1,000      $62.50  1-Jan-21     $  
   500      $28.75  15-Jan-17     $  
   500      $28.75  15-Jan-17     $  
   500      $28.75  15-Jan-17     $  
   500      $38.00  15-Jan-18     $  
   500      $38.00  15-Jan-18     $  
       500  $38.00  15-Jan-18     $  
   2,505      $22.00  15-Apr-17     $  
   500      $20.50  16-Jan-19     $  
       500  $20.50  16-Jan-19     $  
       500  $20.50  16-Jan-19     $  

 89(a)Unvested Time Conditioned Restricted Stock Award granted September 29, 2018. The total number of Restricted Stock Awarded was 2,000,000 shares of which 1,000,000 have actually been issued and 1,000,000 remained unvested as per December 31, 2018, The remaining 1,000,000 are scheduled to vest equally over the 12 months of 2019.

(1)          The stock options vested on the grant date November 16, 2015, and have a term of seven years from the date of grant.

 

(2)          The stock options were granted on November 16, 2015, have a term of seven years from the date of grant and will vest in equal tranches in the years 2016, 2017 and 2018.

(3)          The stock options vested on the grant date December 4, 2013, and have a term of five years from the date of grant.

(4)          The stock options vested on the grant date April 5, 2013, and have a term of three years from the date of grant.

(5)          The stock options vested on the grant date January 23, 2015, and have a term of three years from the date of grant.

(6)          The stock options vested on the grant date January 23, 2015, and have a term of three years from the date of grant.

(7)          The stock options were granted on January 29, 2015, have a term of four years from the date of grant and will vest in three equal tranches in the years 2016, 2017 and 2018.

(8)          The stock options were granted on April 1, 2015, have a term of five years from the date of grant and will vest in four equal tranches in the years 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019.

 90(b)Unvested Time Conditioned Restricted Stock Award granted November 17, 2017. The total number of Restricted Stock Awarded was 850,000 shares of which 613,887 have actually been issued and 236,113 remained unvested as per December 31, 2018.

 1The stock options vested on the grant date May 10, 2018 and will start vesting February 5, 2019 for 1/3 and will be followed by 24 equal monthly vestings, expiration date will be February 5, 2022.

 

2The stock options were granted on January 9, 2017, start vesting January 7, 2018 for 1/3 and will have 24 subsequent equally monthly vestings, expiration date will be January 7, 2020.

 

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

 

The following table represents stock options that have been exercised and restricted stock awards that have vested as of December 31, 2016.2018.

 

 Option Awards  Stock Awards  Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
 Value Realized on
Exercise ($)
 Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)(a)
 Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)
  Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
 Value Realized on
Exercise ($)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)(a)
 Value Realized on
Vesting ($)
 
Robert H. Turner  0  $-   86,000  $257,785   0  $-   1,375,000  $2,986,250.00 
                                
Vic Bozzo  0  $-   0  $-   0  $-   306,943   736,663.20 
                                
Alex Korff  0  $-   49,807  $186,870   0  $-   208,329   542,906.27 
                                
Edward O’Donnell  0  $-   0  $-   0  $-   0   - 
                                
Erik Kloots  0  $-   44,791  $134,262 
Denis McCarty          0  $            -         0   - 
                
Laura Thomas  0  $-   0   - 
          1,890,272  $4,265,819 

 


Our named executive officers did not participate in, or otherwise receive any benefits under, any pension or retirement plan sponsored by us during 2016. In addition, our named executive officers did not participate in, or otherwise receive any benefits under, a nonqualified deferred compensation plan during 2016.2018.

 

 (a)The awards have been granted in 2017 and 2018 and vested in 2016,during 2017 and 2018, however, some of the shares vested in 2017 were only issued and delivered early 2017.2018. The corresponding share-based compensation expenses have been accounted for in 2016.the year of vesting with an fair market value adjustment at the delivery date of the shares of common stock.

 

Director Compensation

The basic compensation for serving as a non-executive director is USD $80,000 per year, with an additional USD $10,000 for non-executive directors serving in one committee and USD $20,000 paid to non-executive directors who serve on more committees of our Board of Directors, USD $30,000 for serving as chairman of the Audit Committee and USD $5,000 for serving as a chairman of the other committees. Generally, during a non-executive director’s first year of service, a minimum of 50% of such director’s compensation is paid through the issuance of common stock with the remaining portion paid in cash. In subsequent years of service, a non-executive director gets to elect the method and proportion of payment. Compensation was paid per quarter in arrears, whereby the conversion of cash in shares was done at the average closing share price of the Company of the 10 days prior to the startend of the respective quarter discounted by 25%. This is in line with our policy to stimulate as much as possible conversion into shares to preserve our cash position.

 

The following table represents compensation earned or paid in 20162018 to our non-executive directors.

Name Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Option
Awards
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
  Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total ($) 
Yves van Sante (2) $129,851  $237,865  $-  $                     -  $(42,767) $                  -  $324,949 
Laura Thomas (3)  181,054   47,002   31,941   -   (48,048)      -   211,948 
Luis Jimenez Tuñon (4)  40,000   437,758   -   -   (97,749)  -   380,009 
Robert Lippert (5)  -   -   -   -   19,899   -   19,899 

 

Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Option
Awards
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
  Non-
Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
  All Other Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 
Carl Stevens $-  $18,131  $      $      $      $      $18,131 
Yves van Sante (2) $-  $140,428  $      $      $      $      $

140,428

 
Francisco Ros (3) $6,381  $9,972  $      $      $      $      $16,353 
Roderick de Greef (4) $81,250  $65,817  $      $      $      $      $147,067 
Robert Skaff (5) $52,170  $71,059  $      $      $      $      $123,229 

 91

(1)The amounts included in these columns are the aggregate fair values of the awards granted by the Company to the directors in the fiscal year in lieu of cash fees or other awards, valued in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.2018. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts in these columns exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The share prices used for the 20162018 calculations in this table are the share prices of the last 10 trading days of the quarter covering the compensation related period. Compensation to the directors can be elected by the directors, at the beginning of the quarter, either in cash or in shares. When directors opt for payment in shares there is a 25% discount on the ‘purchase’ price. The amounts however are shown at fair market value by using the closing share price at the last working daydate of the compensated quarter.delivery. In principle non-executive officer directors might earn up to approximately 33% more than the standard director fees if they have elected to receive 100% compensation in shares.

 

(2)Mr. van Sante electedearned a cash directorship fees of $129,851 which includes deferred board fee payable as per December 31, 2017. During 2018 Mr. van Sante earned €25,000 outside the normal board fee arrangement and furthermore Mr. van Sante was compensated $26,042 for directorships activities for Pareteum subsidiaries. During 2018 a fair market value of $237,865 in shares of common stock were issued to Mr van Sante for shares which were awarded in 2017 and vested during 2018 66,666 shares and an award of 40,000 shares. Mr. van Sante did not elect to have his directorship fees paid in shares.shares for 2018. Currently $49,459 of his fees is still unpaid. The number of shares pending to be issued as per December 31, 2018 for non-cash compensation in lieu of cash for services prior to 2018 is 133,052 which have a fair market value of $294,512 and are expected to be issued in the first quarter of 2019.

 

(3)Mr. RosMs. Thomas earned cash directorship fees of $6,381$181,054 in 2016,2018, of which have not yet been paid.$7,113 was paid as a deferred part of her 2017 cash compensation.

 

(4) (5)Mr. de Greef earnedLippert joined our Board of Directors in November 2018 and didn’t receive cash directorship fees in 2018, however, an amount of $81,250$8,125 is currently being booked as deferred cash fees and is expected to be paid in 2016, of which $10,417 has not yet been paid.early 2019, another $11,774 being the fair market value as per December 31, 2018 for 6,967 shares is being accounted for and shares are expected to be delivered early 2019.

 

(5)Mr. Skaff earned cash directorship fees of $52,170 in 2016, which have not yet been paid.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Plan Category Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
the equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  2006 Plan (1): 0
2008 Plan (2): 1,040,211
   2006 Plan: n/a
2008 Plan: $13.35
   2006 Plan: 0
2008 Plan: 586,636
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  -   -   - 
Total  1,040,211   -   586,636 

(1)S-8 Filed July 21, 2006.

(2)S-8 Filed July 11, 2008. The stockholders approved the increase of the total number of shares of authorized to be issued under the 2008 Plan from 200,000 to 920,000, during 2013 the stockholders approved an increase from 920,000 to 1,840,000 and during 2014 an increase of the total number of shares available under the Plan from 1,840,000 to 2,240,000.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.Matters

 

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS, OFFICERS ANDDirectors

The following table sets forth, based on 12,766,102109,399,780 shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of March 27, 2017,18, 2019, certain information as to the stock ownership of each person known by us to own beneficially five percent or more of our outstanding Common Stock, of each of the named executive officers and directors, and of all the named executive officers and directors as a group. In computing the outstanding shares of Common Stock, we have excluded all shares of Common Stock subject to options, warrants or other securities that are not currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days and are therefore not deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding the options, warrants or other securities for the purpose of computing the number of shares beneficially owned and the percentage ownership of that person. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each person listed below is c/o Pareteum Corporation, at 100 Park1185 Avenue Suite 1600,of the Americas, 37th Floor, New York, NY 10017, USA.10036.

 

92

Name of Beneficial Holder Number of Shares of Common Stock Owned(A)  Percent of Class as of March 27, 2017 
Saffelberg Investments N.V.  1,263,844(1)  9.9%
Corbin Mezzanine Fund I, L.P.  1,248,381(2)  9%
Bernard Moncarey  1,140,840(3)  8.7%
         
Officers & Directors        
         
Yves Van Sante  50,297   * 
Hal Turner  230,972(4)  2.1%
Roderick de Greef  18,078    
Robert Skaff  72,167    
Luis Jimenez-Tuñon  0   * 
Victor Bozzo  41,036(5)  * 
Edward O’Donnell  22,036(6)  * 
Erik Kloots  55,797(7)  * 
Alexander Korff  64,844(8)  * 
         
         
All Officers and Directors as a Group  555,227   4.3%

* Less than one percent  

Name of Beneficial Holder Number of Shares of
Common Stock Owned(A)
  Percent of Class as
of March 18, 2019
 
5% or More Holders (none reported)        
         
Officers & Directors        
Yves Van Sante  286,285(2)  0.3%
Robert H. Turner  2,765,973(4)  2.5%
Luis Jimenez-Tuñon  280,056(5)  0.3%
Robert Lippert  16,967(1)  0.0%
Victor Bozzo  803,757(6)  0.7%
Denis McCarthy  -(3)    
Edward O’Donnell  228,697(7)  0.2%
All Officers and Directors as a Group (7 Persons)  4,381,735(2)-(7)  4.0%

 

(A) Calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-(3)(d)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

(1) Issued options have not yet vested. 

(2) Excludes 133,333 shares of common stock pursuant to a restricted stock award which does not vest within 60 days of March 18, 2019. 

(3) Issued options have not yet vested. 

(4) Includes 226,172stock received and purchased through March 18, 2019. 

(5) Excludes 105,558 shares underlyingof common stock pursuant to a warrant exercisablerestricted stock award which does not vest within 60 days of March 18, 2019. 

(6) Includes 194,445 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options vested or to be vested within 60 days of March 18, 2019. 

(7) Includes (i) 36,111 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options vested or to be vested within 60 days of March 18, 2019, at an exercise price of $1.87$2.37, and 90,812 shares underlying the 9% Note. Their address is in Gooik, Belgium.

(2) Includes 1,082,066 shares underlying a warrant exercisable at $3.25 per share. Corbin Capital Partners, L.P., is an adviser to this entity, and Corbin Capital Partners Management, LLC, the sole general partner of this entity, may be deemed to beneficially own the(ii) 180,549 shares of Common Stock that maycommon stock issuable upon exercise of options vested or to be deemed beneficially owned by this entity. Their address is 590 Madison Avenue, 31st Floor, New York, New York 10022.

(3) Includes 410,000 shares underlying a warrant exercisablevested within 60 days of March 18, 2019, at $3.50. His address is Rue Emile Lavandier, Luxembourg.

(4) Includes options to purchase 125,000 shares of our Common Stock, all of which are exercisable on or before March 27, 2017, of which 75,000 options have an exercise price of $3.50 and 50,000 options have an exercise price of $8.25.$1.00.

(5) Includes options to purchase 30,000 shares of our Common Stock, all of which are exercisable on or before March 27, 2017, and which have an exercise price of $4.3725.

(6) Includes options to purchase 10,000 shares of our Common Stock, all of which are exercisable on or before March 27, 2017, and which have an exercise price of $2.755.

(7) Includes options to purchase 11,005 shares of our Common Stock, all of which are exercisable on or before March 27, 2017, of which 2,000 have an exercise price of $33.75; 4,000 have an exercise price of $62.50; 1,500 have an exercise price of $38.00; 2,505 have an exercise price of $22.00; 1,000 have an exercise price of $20.50.

(8) Includes options to purchase 15,072 shares of our Common Stock, all of which are exercisable on or before March 27, 2017, of which 3,000 have an exercise price of $62.50; 1,500 have an exercise price of $28.75; 1,500 have an exercise price of $38; 3,072 have an exercise price of $22; 1000 have an exercise price of $20.50; 5,000 have an exercise price of $2.8775. (Significant Employee).

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships, and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.Independence

 

Transactions with Related Persons

 

Management of the Company is not aware of a material interest, direct or indirect, of any director or officer of the Company, any other informed person of the Company, or any associate or affiliate of any such person, in any transaction since the commencement of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year or in any proposed transaction which has materially affected or would materially affect the Company or any of its subsidiaries, except for (i)for:

During 2017 and 2018, the saleCompany retained Robert Turner of former subsidiary ValidSoft;InTown Legal Services, who is the son of Robert H. Turner, Executive Chairman of the Board. InTown Legal Services has a $5,000 per month minimum retainer with the Company and (ii)was paid $66,114 in 2017 and $133,194 in 2018. The agreement between the debt restructuring transactions with Atalaya Capital ManagementCompany and Corbin Mezzanine Fund I, L.P. – in each case as described elsewhere herein. InTown Legal Services is an at will agreement.

 

In the event of any future transactions between us and our officers, directors or five percent stockholders, and respective affiliates will be on terms no less favorable than could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties and will be approved by our independent directors.

 

93

Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions

Related party transactions are subject to the advance review and approval of the Audit and Finance Committee and/or the full Board of Directors, with advice from the General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer as well as outside Counsel.counsel. In its review, the Audit Committee and/or Board is provided with full disclosure of the parties involved in the transaction and considers the relationships amongst the parties and members of our Board of Directors and executive officers.

 

Independence Standards for Directors

 

There are no arrangements between our directors and any other person pursuant to which our directors were nominated or elected for their positions.

 

FourThree of our current directors, Roderick de Greef, Rob Skaff, Yves van Sante, and Luis Jimenez-Tuñon and Robert Lippert are not related to each other and are “independent” under Section 803 of the NYSE MKTExchange rules. Each of Messrs. De Greef, Skaff, van Sante and Jimenez-Tuñon and Lippert serve on the Audit and Finance Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Executive Chairman is not independent.

 

In addition, Messrs. de Greef, Skaff,Mr. van Sante and Mr. Jimenez-Tuñon and Mr. Lippert qualify as “independent” under the standards established by the SEC for members of audit committees. The Board of Directors has determined that Roderick de GreefMr. Lippert is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K. Stockholders should understand that this designation is a disclosure requirement of the SEC related to Mr. de Greef’sLippert’ experience and understanding with respect to certain accounting and auditing matters. The designation does not impose upon Mr. de GreefLippert any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than those generally imposed on him as a member of the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors, and his designation as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this SEC requirement does not affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the Audit Committee or the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors also determined that Mr. de GreefLippert has sufficient knowledge in reading and understanding financial statements to serve on the Audit Committee.

 

Item 14. Principal AccountantAccounting Fees and Services

 

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed by Squar MilnerBaker Tilly US, LLP (“Squar Milner”Baker Tilly”), our independent registered accounting firm, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20152018 and December 31, 2016.2017. These fees are categorized as audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees, and all other fees. The nature of the services provided in each category is described in the table below.

 

 2016 2015  2018 2017 
Audit fees $220,000  $220,000  $350,000  $240,000 
Audit-related fees $14,000  $20,000   -   - 
Tax fees $-  $-   28,000   28,000 
All other fees $-  $-   -  $60,000 
Total Fees $234,000  $240,000  $378,000  $328,000 

 

Audit fees. Consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the consolidated financial statements and review of the quarterly interim consolidated financial statements. These fees also include the review of registration statements and the delivery of consents in connection with registration statements.

 

Audit-relatedTax fees. ConsistConsists of fees paid to Baker Tilly related to the reviewfilings of SEC comment lettersFederal and management response.State returns during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

TaxAll other fees. There were noConsists of fees billed by Squar Milner for professional services rendered for tax compliancerelated to letters to underwriters in connection with certain registration statements for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015.2017.

All other fees. There were no fees billed by Squar Milner for professional services rendered for other compliance purposes for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

94

 

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has established its pre-approval policies and procedures, pursuant to which the Audit Committee approved the foregoing audit and audit-related services provided by Squar MilnerBaker Tilly in 20162018 and 20152017 consistent with the Audit Committee’s responsibility for engaging our independent auditors. The Audit Committee also considered whether the non-audit services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm are compatible with an auditor maintaining independence. The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of such services is compatible with Squar MilnerBaker Tilly maintaining its independence.

 


PART IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

The following exhibits are filed with this Report.

 

Number Description
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger between Pareteum Communication Corporation a Delaware Corporation and Pareteum Communications, Inc., a California Corporation (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed dated July 26, 2011). (**)
2.2 Rule 2.7 Announcement dated June 7, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated June 7, 2018).
2.22.3 Co-operation Agreement, dated June 7, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated June 7, 2018).
2.4Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated March 17, 2010, by and among the CompanyPareteum Corporation and the stockholders of ValidSoft Limited other than Enterprise Ireland (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated March 23, 2010). (**)
2.5 
2.3SaleAgreement and Purchase Agreement, dated March 17, 2010,Plan of Merger by and the Companyamong iPass Inc., TBR, Inc. and Enterprise IrelandPareteum Corporation dated November 12, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K8-k dated March 23, 2010)November 13, 2018). (**)
3.1 
3.1Certificate of Merger (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 4, 2011). (**)
3.2 
3.2Certificate of Incorporation of Pareteum Communication Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013). (**)
3.3 
3.3By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Appendix C of the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A dated July 26, 2011). (**)
3.4 
3.4Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2016). (**)
3.5 
3.5Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A Preferred Stock as corrected (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated September 9, 2016). (**)
3.6 
3.6Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A-1 Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated November 3, 2016). (**)
3.7 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated November 3, 2016).
3.73.8 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K dated November 3, 2016). (**)
3.8Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2017). (**)

95

4.13.9 Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated November 8, 2017).
4.1Form of Warrant, dated November 17, 2014, issued to Corbin Mezzanine Fund I, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2014). (**)
4.2 
4.2Form of Conversion Letter Agreement, dated November 17, 2014, issued to Saffelberg Investments NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2014). (**)
4.3 
4.3Form of Warrant, dated November 17, 2014, issued to Saffelberg Investments NV.NV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2014). (**)
4.4 
4.4Form of Warrant, dated July 9, 2015, issued to Corbin Mezzanine Fund I, L.P (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on July 14, 2014). (**)
4.5 
4.5Form of Warrant, dated July 9, 2015, issued to Corbin Mezzanine Fund I, L.P (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on July 14, 2014). (**)
4.6 
4.6Form of Warrant issued in the 9% Unsecured Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note Financing (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 24, 2015). (**)
4.7 
4.7Corbin Warrant, dated December 27, 2016 issued to Corbin Mezzanine Fund I, L.P to purchase 27,051,627 shares of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2016). (**)
4.8 
4.8ACM Warrant, dated December 27, 2016 issued to ACM Carry-I LLC.LLC to purchase 4,773,817 shares of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2016). (**)


4.9 
10.1AmendmentsAmendment No. 1 to Loan AgreementsCorbin Warrant, dated January 27, 2009, February 15, 2009, March 4, 2009, March 31, 2009, May 4, 2009, and May 27, 2009 by and between QAT II Investments S.A. and the Company, dated June 29, 20092017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated July 2, 2009)filed on April 6, 2017). (**)
4.10 
10.2Amendment No. 1 to Loan AgreementsACM Warrant, dated January 27, 2009, February 15, 2009, March 4, 2009, March 31, 2009, May 4, 2009, May 27, 2009, July 1, 2009 and July 8, 2009 by and between QAT II Investments S.A. and the Company, dated July 15, 20092017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14.2 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated July 21, 2009)filed on April 6, 2017).(**)

10.34.11 Form of New Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on July 17, 2017).
4.12Form of Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 1, 2017).
4.13Form of Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2019
10.1Contract between Vodafone Enabler Espana, S.L. and Pareteum Europe Holding, B.V., dated November 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013). (**)
10.2 
10.4Credit Agreement, dated as of November 17, 2014, by and among Pareteum Europe Holding B.V., as the Borrower, Pareteum Corporation, as the Parent and Guarantor, the other Subsidiaries of the Parent, from time to time party hereto as Guarantors, the Lenders from time to time party hereto and Atalaya Administrative LLC, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2014). (**)
10.3 
 10.5Security Agreement, dated as of November 17, 2014, by and among Pareteum Europe Holding B.V., Pareteum Corporation, the other Grantors from time to time party hereto, and Atalaya Administrative LLC, as Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2014). (**)

96

10.610.4 First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2015, by and among Pareteum Europe Holding B.V., as the Borrower, Pareteum Corporation, as the Parent and Guarantor, the other Subsidiaries of the Parent, from time to time party hereto as Guarantors, the Lenders from time to time party hereto and Atalaya Administrative LLC, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’st Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on July 14, 2014). (**)
10.5 
10.7Trademark Security Agreement, dated as of November 17, 2014, between Pareteum Europe Holding B.V. and Atalaya Administrative LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2014). (**)
10.6 
10.8Release and Settlement Agreement, dated as of June 12, 2015, by and between Pareteum de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V., Pareteum Europe Holding BV, and Pareteum Corporation, and Iusacell, S.A., de C.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2015). (**)
10.7 
10.9Severance Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2015, between Pareteum Corporation and Steven van der Velden (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on November 17, 2015). (**)
10.8 
10.10Form of Subscription Agreement issued in the 9% Unsecured Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note Financing (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 24, 2015). (**)
10.9 
10.11Form of 9% Unsecured Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note issued in the 9% Unsecured Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note Financing (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.2 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K filed on December 24, 2015). (**)
10.10 
10.12Amended and Restated Pareteum Corporation 2008 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company’st Pareteum Corporation’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14 A filed on November 21, 2013). (**)
10.11 
10.13Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Pareteum Corporation 2008 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14 A filed on August 11, 2014). (**)
10.12 
10.14Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated September 9, 2016). (**)
10.13 
10.15Form of Share Purchase Agreement dated September 30, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 6, 2016). (**)

10.1610.14 Promissory Note dated September 30, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 6, 2016). (**)
10.15 
10.17License Agreement dated September 30, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 6, 2016). (**)


10.16 
10.18Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated November 3, 2016). (**)
10.17 
10.19Letter Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated December 21, 2016). (**)

97

10.2010.18 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 27, 2016, by and among Elephant Talk Europe Holding B.V., as the Borrower, Pareteum Corporation, as the Parent and Guarantor, the other Subsidiaries of the Parent, from time to time party hereto as Guarantors, the Lenders from time to time party hereto and Atalaya Administrative LLC, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated December 29, 2016). (**)
10.19 
10.21Reaffirmation Agreement, dated as of December 27, 2016, by and among Elephant Talk Europe Holding B.V., as the Borrower, Pareteum Corporation, as the Parent and Guarantor Pareteum North America Corp., from time to time party hereto as Guarantors and Atalaya Administrative LLC, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated December 29, 2016). (**)
10.20 
10.22Letter Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2017, by and among Elephant Talk Europe Holding B.V., as the Borrower, Pareteum Corporation, as the Parent and Guarantor, the other Subsidiaries of the Parent, from time to time party hereto as Guarantors, the Lenders from time to time party hereto and Atalaya Administrative LLC, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated March 7, 2017). (**)
10.21 
21.1Subsidiaries of the RegistrantAgreement, dated March 30, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.110.1 to the Company’s annualPareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December8-K dated March 31, 2013)2017). (**)
10.22 Amendment, dated March 31, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated April 6, 2017).
23.110.23 Consent public accounting firm Squar Milner, LLP (*)Form of Warrant Exercise Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated July 17, 2017).
10.24 Pareteum Corporation 2017 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Pareteum Corporation’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14 A filed on July 27, 2017).
31.110.25 Placement Agency Agreement, dated October 5, 2017, between Pareteum Corporation and Dawson James Securities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 5, 2017).
10.26Form of Share Exchange Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 16, 2017).
10.27Form of Strategic Alliance Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated October 16, 2017).
10.28Form of Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2017).
10.29Form of Placement Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2017).
10.30Form of Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated May 9, 2018).
10.31Form of Placement Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated May 9, 2018).
10.32Management Services Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated June 7, 2018).
10.33Amendment dated June 7, 2018 to Management Services Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated June 7, 2018).
10.34Consent and Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement by and among iPass Inc., iPass IP LLC, Fortress Credit Corp., FIP UST LP and DBD Credit Funding LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated February 13, 2019).
10.35Joinder to Security Agreement by Pareteum Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated February 13, 2019).
10.36Joinder to Guarantee by Pareteum Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated February 13, 2019).
10.37Joinder to Pledge Agreement by Pareteum Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Pareteum Corporation’s current report on Form 8-K dated February 13, 2019).


10.38***Credit Agreement between Pareteum Corporation and certain subsidiaries of Pareteum Corporation, Post Road Administrative Finance, LLC and Post Road Special Opportunity Fund I LLP
10.39***Security Agreement between Pareteum Corporation and certain subsidiaries of Pareteum Corporation, Post Road Administrative Finance, LLC and Post Road Special Opportunity Fund I LLP
10.40***Patent Security Agreement between Pareteum Corporation and certain subsidiaries of Pareteum Corporation, Post Road Administrative Finance, LLC and Post Road Special Opportunity Fund I LLP
10.41***Trademark Security Agreement between Pareteum Corporation and certain subsidiaries of Pareteum Corporation, Post Road Administrative Finance, LLC and Post Road Special Opportunity Fund I LLP
21.1Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1. to Pareteum’s Form 10-K filed March 18, 2019)
23.1*Consent of Baker Tilly US, LLP
31.1*Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (*)
31.2* 
31.2Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (*)
32.1* 
32.1Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (*)
32.2* 
32.2Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (*) 

101.INS  XBRL Instance Document. (*)
   
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. (*)
   
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. (*)
   
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. (*)
   
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. (*)
   
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. (*)

*Filed Herewith
**Previously FiledEmployee Compensation Plan
***Confidential Treatment has been requested for certain portions of this Exhibit

 

98

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 Pareteum Corporation
   
 By:/s/ Hal TurnerBart Weijermars
 Name:Hal TurnerBart Weijermars
 Title:Interim Chief Executive Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)Officer
   
  
Date: March 29, 2017December 14, 2020

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Person Capacity Date
     
/s/ Hal TurnerMary Beth Vitale Chairman of the Board and Directorof Directors March 29, 2017December 14, 2020
Hal TurnerMary Beth Vitale (Principal
/s/ Bart WeijermarsInterim Chief Executive OfficerDecember 14, 2020
Bart Weijermars (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/ Vic BozzoLaura Thomas Chief Executive OfficerMarch 29, 2017
Vic Bozzo(Chief Executive Officer)
/s/ Ted O’DonnellInterim Chief Financial Officer March 29, 2017December 14, 2020
Ted O’DonnellLaura Thomas (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  
     
/s/ Roderick de GreefLuis Jimenez-Tuñon Director March 29, 2017December 14, 2020
Roderick de Greef
/s/ Yves van SanteDirectorMarch 29, 2017
Yves van SanteLuis Jimenez-Tuñon    
     
/s/ Robert SkaffLippert Director March 29, 2017December 14, 2020
Robert SkaffLippert    
     
/s/ Luis Jimenez-TuñonDirectorMarch 29, 2017
Luis Jimenez-Tuñon

 

99