UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162020
  
¨TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from [  ] to [  ]

 

Commission file number 333-177463

 

 

 

AudioEye, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware 20-2939845
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
5210 E. Williams Circle, Suite 750, Tucson, Arizona8571185711(866) 331-5324
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)(Registrant’s telephone number, Including area code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:866-331-5324

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

Trading

Symbol(s)

Name of Each Exchange Onon Which Registered
N/ACommon Stock, par value $0.00001 per share AEYEN/AThe Nasdaq Capital Market

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

N/ANone

(Title of class)

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes¨  No x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes¨ Nox

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the lastpast 90 days.  Yes  x   No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes¨x  Nox

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitionthe definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-212b–2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer¨ Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filerxSmaller reporting companyx
Emerging growth company¨   
Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting companyx

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes¨   No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ¨

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrantregistrant’s most recently completed second quarter ended as of June 30, 20162020 was $8,551,581.$52,997,510.

 

As of March 30, 2017, 111,994,1425, 2021, 10,705,684 shares of the registrant’s common stock were issued and outstanding.

 

Documents Incorporated by Reference:None DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the close of its fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item 1.BusinessPart I1
   
Item 1A.1.Risk FactorsBusiness142
   
Item 1B.1A.Unresolved Staff CommentsRisk Factors296
   
Item 2.1B.PropertiesUnresolved Staff Comments2917
   
Item 3.2.Legal ProceedingsProperties2917
   
Item 4.3.Mine Safety DisclosuresLegal Proceedings3017
   
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures17
Part II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities3018
   
Item 6.Selected Financial Data3118
   
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations3118
   
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk4527
   
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data4527
   
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure4527
   
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures4527
   
Item 9B.Other Information4729
   
Part III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance4730
   
Item 11.Executive Compensation5030
   
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Management and Related Stockholder Matters6330
   
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence6730
   
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services7030
   
Part IV
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules7130
Item 16.Form 10-K Summary36
   
 Consolidated Financial StatementsF-1

 

 

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In some cases, you may be able to identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “should,” “will,” “forecasts,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “projects,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of these terms and other similar expressions that predict or indicate future events or trends or that are not statements of historical matters. These forward-looking statements relate to our future plans, objectives, expectations, intentions and financial performance and the assumptions that underlie these statements, and are based only on our current beliefs, expectations and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans and strategies, projections, anticipated events and trends, the economy and other future conditions and speak only as of the date on which they are made.

Because these forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause actual results, events or developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other factors discussed in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” contained in this Annual Report. Risk factors that could cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include but are not limited to risks related to:

·the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures implemented to contain the spread of the virus have had, and are expected to continue to have, a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations;

·the uncertain market acceptance of our existing and future products;

·our need for, and the availability of, additional capital in the future to fund our operations and the development of new products;

·the success, timing and financial consequences of new strategic relationships or licensing agreements we may enter into;

·rapid changes in Internet-based applications that may affect the utility and commercial viability of our products;

·the timing and magnitude of expenditures we may incur in connection with our ongoing product development activities;

·the level of competition from our existing competitors and from new competitors in our marketplace; and

·the regulatory environment for our products and services.

Readers of this report are cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements, since there can be no assurance that these forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate.  Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we expressly disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.  You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. This cautionary note is applicable to all forward-looking statements contained in this report.

As used in this annual report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “AudioEye,” the “Company” and similar references refer to AudioEye, Inc.

PART I

 

Item 1.Business

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to either future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you may be able to identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of these terms or other synonymous terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors,” that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend, and we do undertake any obligation, to revise or update any of the forward-looking statements to match actual results. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made in this report, which aim to inform interested parties of the risks factors that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

As used in this annual report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “AudioEye” the “Firm” the “Company” and similar references refer to AudioEye, Inc.

 

Overview

 

AudioEye is a marketplace leader providing weban industry-leading software solution provider delivering website accessibility solutions for our clients’ customers through our Ally Platform products.compliance at all price points to businesses of all sizes. Our solutions advance accessibility with patented technology that reduces barriers, expands access for individuals with disabilities, and enhances the user experience for a broader audience of users.When implemented, weaudience. We believe that, when implemented, our solutions offersolution offers businesses and organizations the opportunity to reach more customers, improve brand image, and build additional brand loyalty. In addition, our solutions help organizations complyloyalty, and, most importantly, provide an accessible and usable web experience to the expansive and ever-growing global population of individuals with internationally accepted Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) as well as U.S., Canadian, Australian, and United Kingdom accessibility laws.disabilities.

 

We generate revenuesAudioEye primarily generates revenue through the sale of subscriptions offor our software-as-a-service (SaaS)(“SaaS”) accessibility solutions. Our solutions are backed by AudioEye’s machine-learning/AI-driven technology platform, calledthat finds and fixes common accessibility errors. Our core and supplemental solutions are designed to help websites and applications achieve and sustain substantial conformance with AudioEye’s interpretation of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (“WCAG”) which are web accessibility standards published by the Web Accessibility Initiative of the World Wide Web Consortium, the main international standards organization for the internet. Our solutions help mitigate a customer’s risk of costly digital accessibility-related legal action. AudioEye customers may purchase solutions directly through the AudioEye Ally Platform, to website owners, publishers, developers, and operators andMarketplace, through the delivery of managed services combineda platform partner or an agency, such as Duda, that integrates our solutions into their marketplace, through a vertical Content Management System (“CMS”) partner, or through an authorized reseller, or by working directly with the implementationAudioEye sales team. Our offerings serve businesses and organizations of all sizes and at all price points.

AudioEye stands out among its competitors because it delivers machine-learning/artificial intelligence (“AI”)-driven accessibility without fundamental changes to the website architecture. As another differentiator, we offer transparency. Our offerings provide automated remediations and a transparent compliance score with additional manually driven enhancements. AudioEye solution.pairs its patented technology solutions with certified accessibility experts, which allows our customers to achieve a higher level of compliance than competitors relying solely on automation. Our solutions have been adoptedtechnology publishes more than one billion remediations daily, and our solution is trusted by some of the largest and most influential companies in the world. Our customers span disparate industriesworld, including ADP, Tommy Hilfiger, 360 Media, Samsung, Darden, Landry’s and target market verticals, which encompass (but are not limited to)more. Government agencies, from the following categories: human resources, finance, transportation, media, and education. Government agenciesfederal level down to the local level, have also integrated our software in their digital platforms.platforms, including the Federal Communications Commission and the Social Security Administration.

 

Industry Background

 

Millions of Internet users suffer disabilities that prevent them from accessing and using information on an equivalent basis. If not coded properly, a website or application may not offer full access to content or functionality for all users,individuals with disabilities and, in particular, for users of assistive technology (AT)(“AT”), such as a screen reader. As a result, theythose sites may exclude potential users and customers. TheseAs discussed in more detail below, these sites also may not comply with U.S. and foreign laws addressing equal accessrequiring accessibility and digital inclusion.inclusion, such as Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. Website accessibility lawsuits have continued to increase in recent years. By some estimates, more than 3,000   lawsuits were filed in federal and state courts in 2020.

1

 

Traditional solutions addressing web accessibility may be costly and difficult to implement. Historically, the process for achieving compliance has been driven by costly consulting services and has not fully utilized emerging technologies to reduce the compliance cost burden. At the same time, web accessibility efforts have generally focused on a limited number of disability use cases, leaving many users’ accessibility needs for digital inclusion unaddressed. Businesses may have been reluctant to invest further in web accessibility solutions due to a perceived lack of commercial return on the significant investment required in order to design and implement a thorough and usable compliance solution.

 

ConventionalOther solutions have been developed to help users access websites, but these systems often require the installation of a plug-in or software to be installed on the user’s computer. Many of these solutionsSimilarly, some are tailored to either single or a limited number of use cases and do not encompass multiple tool setsa more holistic approach for addressing compliance and accessibility.


AudioEye Solutions

At its core, AudioEye’s provides an always-on testing, remediation, and monitoring solution that continually improves conformance with WCAG. This in turn helps businesses and organizations comply with WCAG standards as well as applicable U.S. and foreign accessibility laws. Our technology is capable of immediately identifying and fixing common accessibility errors and addresses a widerwide range of use cases. In some cases, these systems candisabilities including dyslexia, color blindness, epilepsy and more. AudioEye also offers additional solutions to provide for enhanced compliance and accessibility including periodic manual auditing, manual remediations and legal support services. Our solutions may be costly, unwieldypurchased through a subscription service on a month-to-month basis or with one or multi-year terms. We also offer PDF remediation services and inconvenient. Furthermore,Native Mobile App audit reports to help our customers with their digital accessibility needs.

AudioEye Customers

Our current and potential customer base includes a very broad range of private and public sector customers, including:

·Small- and medium-sized businesses;

·Corporate enterprises;

·Non-profit organizations;

·Federal government agencies, whose electronic and information technology must be accessible to people with disabilities, including employees and members of the public, pursuant to Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; and

·Foreign, state and local governments and agencies, which often have laws and regulations that require accessibility for people with disabilities.

AudioEye Channels / Go-to-market:

We go-to-market through two primary channels: Enterprise and Partner and Marketplace.

Enterprise channel consists of our larger customers and organizations, including those with non-platform custom websites, who generally engage directly with AudioEye sales personnel for custom pricing and solutions. This channel also includes federal, state and local government agencies.

Partner and Marketplace channel consists of our CMS partners, platform & agency partners, authorized resellers and the assistive software’s ability to understand, process,Marketplace. This channel serves small and interpret complex and dynamic web applicationsmedium sized businesses that are prevalent across the web today is dependent on the quality in which the code was designed and developed, including the level to which the website adheres to best practices and standards. a partner or reseller’s web-hosting platform or who purchase an AudioEye solution from our Marketplace.

 

The AudioEye SolutionCompany had one major customer (including the customer’s affiliates reflecting multiple contracts and a partnership with the Company) which accounted for approximately 16.7% of the Company’s revenue in the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company had one major customer which generated approximately 10% of its revenue in the year ended December 31, 2019.

 


AudioEye uses proprietary technology and development tools to offer web accessibility solutions that offer significant savings in time and money relative to traditional solutions. Our compliance solutions focus on rapid remediation of the most important accessibility issues, followed by in-depth analysis identifying and addressing a more comprehensive compliance program. Our technology was built totypical market sectors include, but are not only provide users with a cloud-based assistive toolset that gets embedded and made freely available to users within our client websites, but to also improve the code in a way that optimizes the user experience for users of existing third-party assistive technologies, such as screen readers.

Remediationlimited to:

 

By deploying AudioEye remediation technology to fix common and high-impact issues, AudioEye is able to improve the usability of our client sites on the first day that they implement our solution into their site. Over a period that we believe averages approximately 100 days, with actual time dependent on the complexity of the client’s web site and other client-specific factors, our proprietary Digital Accessibility Platform (DAP) empowers AudioEye engineers to run in-depth analyses to fully understand and manually fix issues. For organizations that do not want a managed SaaS solution and prefer to achieve WCAG 2.0 Level AA compliance on their own, our cloud-based Digital Accessibility Platform provides them with a comprehensive single-source solution for tracking and maintaining a compliance audit of their web environments. The Digital Accessibility Platform combined with Ally Managed Services that include AT testing and support services, provide transparency for our clients allowing product owners to better understand accessibility and usability issues as they look to fix issues at the source. Each month, AudioEye addresses millions of website problems for its clients; these site improvements help prevent usability issues and may enhance the user experience for site visitors – in particular, those customers accessing websites through the use of assistive technology such as those provided by Microsoft, Apple, Google, and others.

Business-Driven Accessibility

·Finance and banking institutions;

 

In addition to our compliance solutions, AudioEye offers business-driven, cloud-based tools that enable our clients to provide a more accessible, usable, and customizable experience to their customers. Improving digital experiences for end users leveraging their own assistive technology is just one focus for meeting the needs of our targeted end-users. In addition to AT users, a much larger demographic of users (many of whom do not self-identify as having a disability or impairment) may benefit from the availability of free user-friendly tools that allow them to customize and optimize their digital experience. In short, we seek to enhance the user experience for all individuals who arrive at digital experience without having full access to a high-quality user experience. Our mission is not only one of inclusion but to also provide a superior user experience for anyone accessing our proprietary assistive tools.

2·Travel and hospitality companies;

 

Implementation

·Public and private transportation companies;

 

We offer solutions that enable our clients to enhance their brand by demonstrating a robust approach to web accessibility. When adopting our technology, clients implement the Ally Toolbar into their website. By embedding the AudioEye JavaScript, our clients can offer the Ally Toolbar, our patented AT-in-the-Cloud solution that provides our clients’ new and returning customers the opportunity to thoroughly engage and interact with client websites in a more meaningful and customizable way, regardless of their device type, language preference, or preferred method of access. From the toolbar, site visitors are provided with a Player utility that allows them to listen to the content of the website read aloud, a Reader utility that allows them to customize the visual display of the website, a Voice utility that allows them to command the browser using their voice, and a Certification statement that helps our client promote their commitment to accessibility and digital inclusion.

·Retail and ecommerce companies;

 

These tools offer benefits to a broad range of site visitors, especially aging populations and individuals who have vision, hearing, motor and intellectual disabilities, including those who are color blind, dyslexic, learning to read, and looking to maintain focus or multi-task. 
·

Educational institutions (which occasionally enter into settlement agreements with the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights regarding accessibility);

 

·Food services companies; and

We provide our customers with detailed remediation statistics and analytics that demonstrate utilization of the Ally solution. This provides our clients with prompt feedback into the different ways in which their site visitors are engaging with their optimized website and digital content.

·SaaS service or solution providers.

 

Intellectual Property

Our technology development was initiated at the University of Arizona Science & Technology Park in Tucson, Arizona. In 2006, we received technology development venture funding from the Maryland Technology Development Corporation (TEDCO), which contributed to the development of our platform strategy. Beginning in 2009, we engaged in a multi-year technology development program with the Eller College of Management’s Department of Management Information Systems at the University of Arizona. In connection with our proprietary technology, our company has been issued a number of U.S. patents in two distinct patent families. Today, an experienced team of in-house engineers, designers, and developers in our Atlanta, GA, and Tucson, AZ, offices develop the Company’s technology and software and are actively engaged in the expansion of the AudioEye IP Portfolio.

  

Our intellectual property is primarily comprised of trade secrets, trademarks, issued, published and pending patent applications, copyrights and technological innovation. We have a patent portfolio comprised of sixseventeen (17) issued patents in the United States, weStates. We also have four published/eight (8) pending patent applications one pendingand two (2) international patent application and one patent application being prepared for filing withapplications filed via the PCT (internationally)Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”). The commercial value of these patents is unknown.

  

We have a trademark portfolio comprised of one allowed trademark application, two published trademark applications, and five trademark registrations. 

Our current patented invention relates to a server-side method and apparatus that enables users to audibly navigate websites and hear high-quality streaming audio narration and descriptions of websites. This patented invention involves creating an audio-enabled web experience by utilizing voice talent and automated text-to-speech conversion methods to read and describe web content. It involves the creation of audio files for each section within a website, and then assigning a hierarchy and navigation system in line with the website design. To implement the system, a script is installed across the pages of the website and, when loaded, it plays an audible tone upon a user’s visit indicating that the website is enhanced with our proprietary technology. Upon hearing the tone, a user presses a key on the keyboard to enter the audible website. Audible narration is played through the user’s computer, reading text and describing non-text information, such as images. The narration includes menus for navigating the site which have a hierarchy in line that of the original website. Users navigate the website menus and move from webpage to webpage by making keystrokes or using a mouse.

3

Our current portfolio has established a foundation for building unique technology solutions that contribute to the way in which we differentiate ourselves from other competitors in the B2B Web Accessibility marketplace. We plan to continue to invest in research and development and expand our portfolio of proprietary intellectual property.

 

Business Plan and StrategyCompetition

 

Leveraging our own patented and patent pending Ally Platform product suite, we provide cloud-based, enterprise-grade technology solutions, as well as managed services to fully implement our solution and provision our clients’ sites to conform with web accessibility best practices. Our technology and professional service offerings may be purchased through a subscription for either a one-year or multi-year term. Functionally, the business is organized into Technology, Operations and Customer Support, Sales and Marketing, and Intellectual Property Development. Intellectual Property Development is tasked with the development of new leading edge intellectual property.

Through the sale of managed and self-service contracts, our business model is to sell Business to Business and to secure revenue from multiple business channels, including (but not limited to): corporate website owners, publishers, developers, and operators, federal, state and local governments, educational institutions and e-learning websites, and not-for-profit organizations.

In what Forrester has called the “age of the customer”, we believe that, by adopting our solutions, our customers gain a competitive advantage by ensuring a superior digital experience for all of their customers, in particular for persons with diverse abilities. Some of the many leading advantagesMost of our solution include:competition falls within the following categories:

 

1.Maintaining a mission of inclusion and accessibility for the 5%-10% of the population with a disability or physical limitation who are denied full access to online digital content.

2.Increasing the client return on investment by improving market penetration, brand reputation and brand loyalty.

3.Ensuring conformance with WCAG 2.0 Level AA success criteria.

4.Deploying a cost effective and reliable solution that is scalable with rapid deployment and little to no project management.

5.Consistently providing an enhanced customer experience for our client customers by providing access to innovative and universally designed technology solutions.

Our primary objective is to establish and maintain a long standing relationship with our customers, as a trusted and relied upon provider of web accessibility technology and service. The key tenants of this strategy include:

1.Continually innovating and strengthening the capabilities of our solution offering to attract new customers and entice existing customers to expand their level of service.

2.Providing industry-leading analytics and site analysis reports that demonstrate a clear return on investment.

3.Maintaining a consistent record of low customer attrition through ongoing subscription renewals.

4.Expanding customer adoption across different target market vertical and leveraging strong customer relationships to establish a significant portfolio of clients within each vertical.

5.Establishing a global client base that demonstrates a clear and high level of value within the context of disparate international laws and regulations surrounding the issue of web accessibility and best practices.

6.Leveraging our board of directors and advisory board members to shorten sales cycles and to gain support and buy-in from C-level executives.

7.Investing in a long-term patent protection strategy to ensure industry leading technological innovations are protected.

4

8.Leading the dialogue and establishing our voice as technology leaders as it pertains to industry related topics, news, developments and events.

Product Service Offerings

We offer a diversified portfolio of service offerings that are broken into two broad business categories: subscription of our web accessibility technology platform and managed services.

Our web accessibility technology platform (The AudioEye Ally Platform) consists of the Digital Accessibility Platform and Ally Managed Service, which are offered as an Internet Cloud SaaS subscription service. AudioEye offers two distinct Web Accessibility solution offerings: Digital Accessibility Platform and Ally Managed Service.

The AudioEye Digital Accessibility Platform empowers web developers to improve their website using the most current, innovative, and industry-leading tools. Primarily, the Digital Accessibility Platform is a self-service solution for clients who want to own the accessibility process from beginning to end and puts the power of accessibility issue tracking, auditing and remediation in the hands of developers to improve the usability and accessibility of their web infrastructure. Customers leveraging the Digital Accessibility Platform have the option of embedding the AudioEye JavaScript into the front-end of their website, allowing them to not only get the benefits of auto-fixes that improve the usability and compliance level of their site, but it also allows them to manage the remediation process in a controlled environment that serves as an important resource for ongoing site auditing and issue tracking. At the same time, for organizations that are developing for accessibility, this robust site evaluation tool provides detailed information to help developers and designers fully understand the identified issues as well as the different WCAG 2.0 best practices that may be implemented in order to improve their website through changes implemented at the source.

For organizations looking to offload the accessibility process, the Ally Managed Service allows AudioEye Accessibility Engineers and AT Usability Testers to do all the heavy lifting in order to achieve accessibility and compliance for our clients. This unique offering leverages a balance of system and engineer generated remediation techniques to programmatically fix website problems that inhibit full access to our clients electronic information technologies. By providing our customers with full access to the Digital Accessibility Platform and working with them on a long-term basis to provide automated and manual testing in order to fully understand the issues of accessibility and how to develop with web accessibility in mind, AudioEye is able to reduce the burden on IT resources, leaving only limited work for finite client resources. In conjunction with the implementation of the AudioEye JavaScript, AudioEye makes available the option to publish the Ally Toolbar, which includes the Help Desk and Certification Statement. The Help Desk provides support for end users who have issues accessing content, while the Certification Statement outlines our client’s commitment to providing an accessible and usable website experience for individuals with disabilities. As part of the Ally Managed Service, AudioEye makes available detailed reporting that provide the client with the results of remediation efforts.

The AudioEye Ally Toolbar is included with Ally and provides easy-to-use, cloud-based assistive tools that allow our clients to enhance the customer experience for those looking to customize the way in which they engage with the web browser. The Ally patented AT-in-the-Cloud solution provides our clients’ site visitors with the opportunity to thoroughly engage and interact with our clients’ websites in a more engaging and fully customizable way, regardless of their device type, language preference, or preferred method of access.

5

From the Ally Toolbar, users may engage the Player utility that mirrors the features and functions of traditional screen reader software, allowing the user to engage with the web environment by using their keyboard (instead of a mouse) and listening to content instead of reading. Further, the built-in Reader utility allows users to enlarge the viewport, increase font sizes, change color contrast, highlight text as it is being read aloud, reduce clutter and distracting content, simplify and normalize the user interface (including complex site menus) and other features intended to optimize the user experience for addressing specific use cases. Lastly, in the first half of 2016, AudioEye released the first iteration of its Voice utility, which allows site visitors to command the website user experience using basic and standardized verbal commands. The free assistive tools made available within websites enabled with the AudioEye solution have benefits for all site visitors, but, in particular, aging populations and individuals who have vision, hearing, motor and intellectual disabilities, including those who are color blind, dyslexic, learning to read, and looking to maintain focus, or multi-task. Customers adopting this service also receive quarterly reports detailing usage analytics.

As an additional revenue source, AudioEye provides Managed Services that support the SaaS model infrastructure. When clients adopt the Digital Accessibility Platform as a self-service tool, AudioEye markets and sells managed services that include the following: Product Support, Accessibility Training from accessibility engineers and subject matter experts, Manual Assistive Technology Usability Testing, and other ad hoc services such as Video Transcription & Captioning, Manual Document Remediation (PDFs, et al), Audio Description Authoring, Accessibility Help Desk, and more. These same services are also provided to those customers adopting the Ally Managed Service solution and go beyond the inherent managed services that coincide with the implementation of website remediation, the provision of the Ally Toolbar, Player, Reader, and Voice utilities, and, ultimately, the certification of our clients’ web infrastructure.

Customers

Our potential customer base includes a broad range of private and public sector customers, in particular:

·Corporate enterprise;

·Educational institutions;

·Federal, state and local governments and agencies; and

·Not-for-profit organizations

If we are unable to establish, maintain or replace our relationships with customers and develop a diversified customer base, our revenues may fluctuate and our growth may be limited. The Company had two major customers including their affiliates which generated approximately 45.3% (23.8% and 21.5%) and 67.5% (56.3% and 11.2%) of its revenue in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Corporate Enterprise

Our management believes that corporate enterprise is a large market for the Company’s products and services. Management believes that the AudioEye Ally Managed Service product provides a business advantage for our clients by enabling them to better reach the large population of customers who are not able to gain equal access to our clients’ content, products and services delivered via their websites.

Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Actwas enacted to help eliminate barriers to access. Just as building owners must implement physical accommodations to remove any physical barrier to access, transportation, or communication, website owners must adhere to Web Accessibility best practices in order to ensure barrier-free access to their websites and online materials. Over time, a website owner must maintain and prove their implementation of those techniques, such as those outlined within the globally recognizedWeb Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Overall, there are over 6 million business (666,000 public and private employers) that must comply with ADA laws (source: http://www.ada.gov/pubs/mythfct.txt).

6

Internet technologies have the potential to give persons with disabilities the means to live on a more equitable basis within the global community in a manner that previously was not possible. Our management believes that there is significant market opportunity for our services as most websites are developed with the assumption that users can visually see the site. According to a study commissioned by Microsoft, conducted by Forrester Research, Inc., 22% (37.2 million) of working-age adults are very likely to benefit from the use of accessible technology due to severe difficulties and impairments (source: http://www.microsoft.com/enable/research/phase2.aspx). Persons with disabilities form the world’s largest minority according to the United Nations. One billion people are estimated by the World Health Organization to have a disability. According to a 2012 report from the United States Census Bureau, the overall percentage of people with a disability in the U.S. was 12.1% (source: http://www.disabilitystatistics.org/reports/2012/English/HTML/report2012.cfm).

Equally significant to this analysis of market size are the studies surrounding the market influence of this demographic. Consumers are good to businesses that do good and through cause-related marketing strategies, there exists a non-trivial business opportunity. The disability market represents an annual disposable income of $1 trillion—and $544 billion in the U.S. alone. When you include friends and family, this adds another 2.3 billion people who control an incremental $6.9 trillion in annual disposable income (source: Fifth Quadrant Analytics – The Global Economics of Disability Report - http://returnondisability.com/disability-market/). “When the global population reached 7 billion in 2012, 562 million (or 8.0 percent) were aged 65 and over. In 2015, 3 years later, the older population rose by 55 million. The next 10 years will witness an increase of about 236 million people aged 65 and older throughout the world” (Source: U.S. Census Bureau - An Aging World: 2015: International Population Reports - https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/p95-16-1.pdf). This market is likely to have significant disposable income and retirement investments.

Government and Not-for-Profit Organizations Market

Federal and state laws require that the information and services made available across government agency websites meet the diverse and unique needs of all site visitors. Conforming to Web Accessibility best practices and guidelines helps ensure public access to government information and improves the value of agency investment in their websites and online services.

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 requires that individuals with disabilities, who are members of the public seeking information or services from a federal department or agency, have access to and use of information and data that is comparable to that provided to the public without disabilities. The federal government also requires vendors selling to the government to be compliant under Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, unless covered by a provable exception. Canada and the European Union have similar requirements.

Seniors and print-impaired individuals need the Internet’s critical access to fundamental state, local and federal government services and information such as tax forms, social programs, emergency services and legislative representatives. In addition, the roughly 120,000 federal employees with disabilities require Internet accessibility for workplace productivity. The AudioEye Reader in the cloud provides an intuitive Internet experience across all Internet-enabled devices without imposing any additional costs on end users. For government site administrators, our Digital Accessibility Platform is designed to be user-friendly so that sites can be made accessible and maintained as part of any web management process.

The Twenty-First Century Communication and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 mandates that all government websites (city, state and federal) be compliant and provide accessibility to persons with disabilities. Since this legislation was adopted in 2010, a growing number of legal mandates point to the WCAG 2.0 standard – sources range from the Department of Justice (DOJ), the U.S. Access Board, and the Office of Civil Rights (OCR). The Company can help alleviate the risk that comes with non-conformance to these accepted guidelines and principles. Over 100 governments have signed and ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The Company’s certification seal demonstrates a website owner’s commitment to meeting internationally accepted accessibility standards (limited exclusions apply). As a result, our management believes that providing accessibility services for website owners and developers has become a significant market opportunity in view of the potential demand for our patented solutions.

7

The AudioEye solution provides a unique approach to solving a pervasive issue that has inhibited government agencies from embracing efficiencies gained through adopting new cost-effective technological capabilities. More and more federal agencies are beginning to embrace cloud-based service offerings and leveraging the capabilities afforded through the adoption of third-party cloud-based service providers. In many cases, when deployed, a deep understanding of the level of adherence to accessibility is overlooked or, in other cases, lack of adherence to accessibility restricts the federal agency from, ultimately, implementing the third-party solution. This hindrance is problematic for agencies that are striving to move their organizations ahead and keeping pace with the many benefits that come with integrating enterprise-level software solutions. Implementing the AudioEye solution allows federal, state, and local governments to provide constituents with a reliable, scalable, and fully accessible web environment. By pairing the AudioEye Solution with other disparate SaaS offerings, organizations can more readily comply with ADA standards. Implementing AudioEye mitigates risk of non-conformance and goes beyond basic levels of compliance through the inclusion of free cloud-based assistive tools, which lives up to the spirit of ADA - a noble and necessary aspiration for all federal and state government agencies.

Our solutions are sold by our direct sales team and through strategic partnerships and resellers. This strategy enables us to address all of the broad markets covered by our technology and allows for a depth and market penetration that we could never approach on our own.

Our management believes that the government market imposes certain barriers to entry to new potential entrants. However, our management believes that the potential for recurring revenue generation, the data value appreciation that occurs over time, and low turnover upon establishment of government business all contribute to ideal long term conditions that make this a good market for us to conduct direct sales.

The federal government boasts nearly 2,000 top-level .gov domains and 24,000 websites of varying purpose, design, navigation, usability and accessibility. Including the 50 states and all local government websites, there are over 600,000 government websites in the United States.

Potential additional market segments of focus include, but are not limited to:

·Finance & Banking Institutions

·Public & Private Transportation Companies

·Air Carriers (as a result of the Air Carrier Access Act – ACAA - recently updated by the United States Department of Transportation)

·Educational Institutions (as a results of frequent and recent settlement agreements involving and structured by the Department of Justice)

·SaaS Providers

Marketing and Sales

In addition to direct sales with industry specialization and geographical diversification, we use strategic business development referral partners, who maintain a long standing successful track record in securing introductions with C-level executives and key stakeholders that directly influence the buying decision of our technology and services. As a proven means of breaking down barriers to entry and shortening sales cycles, these strategic relationships contribute to the success of our sales operation. Conveying the return on investment of our technology to our prospective clients is critical as a differentiator in our space. Success in all these efforts is not only critical in order to meet our sales objectives, but they also raise market awareness of the Company’s products and brand.

In addition, the Company attends selected accessibility and industry trade conferences, maintains memberships with key, industry-specific organizations, serves as subject matter experts within well-attended panels covering industry-related topics, leverages paid SEO for those looking online to learn about or purchase accessibility products or services, and a variety of other conventional marketing and social marketing techniques.

8

Competition

Our management believes that the Company’s technology and solutions will primarily compete against the following:

1.Web Accessibility Assessment Technology Providers. There are a small number of Web Accessibilityweb accessibility audit and tracking platform providers but wethat purport to analyze websites for accessibility concerns. While these providers may sometimes identify issues for remediation, they typically do not believe theirprovide remediation technology or the additional solutions offer the specific functionality offered through thethat AudioEye Digital Accessibility Platform. Furthermore, their solutions are currently more standalone in that they are not combined with a cloud-based tool with a full suite of comparable assistive tools for end-users.offers.

 

2.·Web Accessibility Remediation Technology Providers. Currently, other technology provider(s) that utilize technologyproviders attempt to apply compliance remediation strictly through a server-sideautomation technology and accessibility toolbars. We believe their solutions do not pair their solutioncompete with the full breadth of solutions offered by AudioEye including the manual auditing and custom remediation services that are essential for achieving a full suitemeaningful level of assistive tools for end-userscompliance that mitigates compliance lawsuits and is, therefore, limited in its capacity to provide a fully inclusive user experience for theprovides customers adopting the technology.with negotiation leverage when defending against legal complaints.

 

3.·Web Accessibility Consulting Service Providers. There isare a substantial number of consulting service providers in the Web Accessibility industry.offering website and application accessibility. Each generally provides an analysis of the various compliance issues associated with theirits clients’ websites. They ultimately provide resources and assistance in applying fixes and changes at the source. While we provideWe believe our offerings are much more cost effective and comprehensive than these services, weproviders. We also provide tools that empower aan end-to-end fully managed service, as well as toolsresources that empower self-directed developers to fix issues without requiring source-code remediation.on their own.

 

4.Cloud-Based Assistive Technology Providers. There are other cloud-based assistive technology providers. However, they do not offer a screen-reader-like experience with mouse-less navigation and do not offer a solution with compliance detection and remediation for users of existing, native assistive technologies, such as screen readers. The Company’s patent portfolio should also help preclude competitors from competing as it pertains to this specific category.


Competitive Strengths

 

Our management believes the following competitive strengths will enable our success in the accessibility marketplace:

 

·Unique patented technology. AudioEye builds all its products with the primary goal of enhancing the user experience regardless of the end-user’s individual disability or physical limitation. AudioEye is a marketplace technology leader providing what we believe to be unparalleled web accessibility solutions for our customers through our suite of offerings.

·Broad price points and offerings. With a free 30-day trial for our base offering, AudioEye allows website owners to test our solution before choosing their preferred option. They range from low-cost offerings, to standard offerings, to our customized, enterprise-wide solutions.

·Unique combination of advanced technology and specialized managed service.expert-driven services. Our management believes unlike any other company in the marketplace,that AudioEye has addressedaddresses the problem of Web Accessibility holistically and has uniquely positioned itself to provideprovides a combination of leading edgeleading-edge technology and high-quality specialized managed service.services. Our one-of-a-kind, combined solution empowerssolutions are designed to provide our clientscustomers with reliable website accessibility compliance solutions, and to ensure the highest level of access and usability across their digital infrastructure, while reducing burden on finite IT resources, which leadslead to cost-savings and reduced time-to-market.time-to-market for our customers. Our management believes that the AudioEye solution allows our customers to focus not only on achieving compliance, but also enables a tangible and non-trivial return on investment – a true competitive advantage. This return on investment is derived from opening up access to help maintain compliance throughout the 5%-10%life of the population with a disability or physical limitation. This has allowed our clients to reach more customers, improve brand image, and build additional brand loyalty from their customers in a competitive manner.

·Unique patented technology. First and foremost, AudioEye builds all its products with the primary goal of enhancing the user experience, in every way possible, regardless of the end-user’s individual disability or physical limitation. AudioEye is a marketplace technology leader providing unparalleled Web Accessibility solutions for our clients’ customers through our Ally Platform Products. We own a unique patent portfolio comprised of six issued patents in the United States, we have received a notice of allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for a seventh patent, and have additional U.S. patents pending. Our portfolio includes patents and pending patent applications in the United States with over 60 issued claims.subscription.

 

9·

We offer greater transparency in marketing our offerings. We believe there is no fully automated solution on the market that can provide 100% compliance. Our offerings provide automated remediations and a transparent compliance score with additional manually driven enhancements. We think that as the industry develops, opaque products with unsubstantiated claims will ultimately fail.

Our current portfolio has established a foundation for building unique technology solutions that contribute to the way in which we differentiate ourselves from other competitors in the B2B Web Accessibility marketplace. We are actively pursuing the expansion of this portfolio to include a broad range of pertinent and novel concepts that AudioEye has employed (or is in the process of employing) for our growing client list. In this continued pursuit of expanding the capabilities of our technology and meeting the demands of our customers, AudioEye is committed to growing its IP portfolio.

 

·Highly experienced inventors, technologists and product development team.team. Our team is comprised of experienced software e-commerce, mobile marketing and Internet broadcastingSaaS developers and technologists that have worked together for over fifteen years. During their careers, this team has developed several technologies programs for Fortune 500 organizations; federal, state and local governments in the United States, and several leading organizations across the global marketplace.technologists.

  

PatentLegal and Trademark RightsRegulatory Framework

 

We have a portfolio comprised of six approved patents in the United States, we have received a notice of allowance fromCourts and the U.S. PatentDepartment of Justice (“DOJ”) broadly hold that Titles II and Trademark Office for a seventh patent, and we have several additional patents that are either pending or are being prepared for filing.

The following is a listIII of our patents, both issued and pending. The patents have been extended and cover a period from 2002 through 2026.

No.I.D.StatusTitle
1US7966184IssuedSystem and method for audible website navigation
2US7653544IssuedMethod and apparatus for website navigation by the visually impaired
3US8260616IssuedSystem and method for audio content generation
4US8046229IssuedMethod and apparatus for website navigation by the visually impaired
5US8296150IssuedSystem and method for audio content navigation
6US8589169IssuedSystem and method for creating audio files
713/280184Published/PendingSystem and method for audio content management
815/074818PendingModular Systems For Selectively Enabling Cloud-Based Assistive Technologies
914/587902Published/Pending

Tracking Device For Audio Playback 

1014/587915Published/PendingTracking Device For Audio Playback
1115/132140Published PendingAudio Onboarding of Digital Content With Enhanced Audio Communications

10

We have also registered the following trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office:

 No.I.D. StatusTitle
      
 186/877454 AllowedNCLUSION
      
 286/647591 PublishedALLY+
      
 386/698544 PublishedYOUR WEB ACCESSIBILITY ALLY
      
 44738981 RegisteredMOBILITY, USABILITY, ACCESSIBILITY
      
 54738980 RegisteredEQUAL ACCESS FOR ALL
      
 64738977 RegisteredWHAT ACCESSIBILITY SHOULD BE
      
 74402544 RegisteredAUDIOEYE
      
 84419997 RegisteredAUDIO INTERNET

Government Regulation

Government regulation in the United States that affects the market and commercial potential for our products and services includes the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the AmericanAmericans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, Section(“ADA”), together with Sections 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA), the Air Carrier Accessibility Act (ACAA), and various State Laws.

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 requires that individuals with disabilities, who are members of the public seeking information or services from a federal department or agency, have access to and use of information and data that is comparable to that provided to the public without disabilities. The federal government also requires vendors selling to the government be compliant under Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, unless covered by a provable exception. Canadarequire public and the European Union have similar requirements.

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was passedprivate websites and mobile applications to ensure equal opportunity forbe accessible to people with disabilities. It applies to employment, transportation, state and local government services, and businesses that provide public accommodations or facilities.

Title II andIn particular, Title III of the ADA preventgoverns private businesses and prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in the provision of services, programs, and activities provided by public entities (Title II)accommodations.  

While the law governing website and private entities consideredmobile application accessibility is still developing, most courts have held that websites and mobile applications fall within Title III’s scope. Some courts hold that Title III applies to be placesall customer-facing websites and mobile applications, while others apply a “nexus” approach, which requires websites and mobile applications to comply with Title III if the website or mobile application is heavily integrated with a physical location. The U.S. Supreme Court has yet to articulate a unified approach, so some degree of public accommodation (Title III). The Department of Justice (DOJ) issuesuncertainty remains. Similarly, the DOJ has not promulgated new regulations implementing those mandates, and is currently in the process of formulating rules regarding the accessibility oflaying out compliance standards for websites and mobile applications. The DOJ has divided its rulemaking into two efforts:In the first will provideabsence of clear guidance, to state and local entities to comply with Title II, and the second will establish rules for private entities to comply with Title III. The DOJ has delayed issuing those rulemakings several times; recent predictions suggest that the DOJ will issue the proposed rules in 2018. The DOJ has released abstract summaries for both rulemakings. 

11

Learn more atwww.ada.gov

Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Requires that federal agencies’ electronic and information technology is accessible to people with disabilities, including employees and the public.

The U.S. Government Access Board is expected to update the requirements to Section 508 compliance standards, commonly referred to as the “Section 508 Refresh,” further formalizing the mandate to adhere to specific webcourts generally measure accessibility best practices, namely those outlined underusing the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)(“WCAG”), which are promulgated by the international standards for web accessibility. Already, a growing number of legal mandates and recent settlements point toWorld Wide Web Consortium.

Although the WCAG 2.0 standardsdoes not carry force of law, courts may order defendants to comply with the WCAG as wella remedy for accessibility violations. Settlements and consent decrees generally require the same. We therefore design our products and services to help customer websites and mobile applications achieve and sustain substantial conformance with our interpretation of the informative guidance supplied through the WCAG, and we continue to improve and update our products and services as making it a requirement to hire third-party Accessibility Subject Matter Experts to maintain an accessibility audit and provide certification – sources range from the Department of Justice (DOJ), the U.S. Access Board, and the Office of Civil Rights (OCR).new guidance emerges.

 

For more information, visit www.section508.govLawsuits alleging website or mobile application accessibility claims typically follow a similar pattern. Both private commercial businesses and governmental agencies are regularly targeted for alleged violations. With an increasing amount of business taking place remotely, ensuring compliance with the relevant accessibility statutes is becoming increasingly important.

 

Section 504 ofThis growing focus on website and mobile application accessibility is also reflected by other federal and state laws. In 2010, Congress enacted the Rehabilitation Act entitles individuals with disabilities to equal access to any program or activity that receives federal subsidy – this includes Web-based communications for educational institutions and government agencies.

In October 2010, the Twenty-First21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 was enactedin an effort to update existing federal laws requiring communications and video programming accessibility and to fill in any current gaps in accessibility so as to ensure the full inclusion oftelecommunications protections for people with disabilities in all aspects of daily living through accessible, affordable and usable communication and video programming technologies.

Perdisabilities. Furthermore, the Department of Transportation Thehas issued rules interpreting and implementing the Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA, 49 U.S.C. 41705)and setting forth website accessibility standards for air carriers. The California Unruh Civil Right Act also prohibits discrimination by U.S. and foreign air carriers on the basis of physical or mental disability. The Department of Transportation, in interpretingdisability, and implementingCalifornia Government code Section 11546.7 requires state agency directors to certify that their websites comply with the ACAA, has issued a rule setting forth the standards of service which air carriers are expected to provide to disabled individuals.

Beyond the federal level, many states have enactedWCAG. This focus on website accessibility laws and, going further,is growing internationally as well, with over 100 Governments have signed andcountries having ratified the UNU.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

 

Given the many government regulations in place and/or in process, actions must be taken in order for businesses to comply with best practices and international standards. This presents a significant business opportunity as more pressure is being put on businesses and organizations to improve the accessibility of their web environments. In addition, from a risk mitigation standpoint, it is best if they consistently and reliably track and demonstrate their level of conformance to these internationally recognized standards over time, the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0).

Employees

 

As of March 30, 2017,December 31, 2020, we had 3189 full-time employees. We utilize independent contractors to supplement our staff, as needed. None of our employees areis subject to a collective bargaining agreement, and we believe that relations with our employees are very good.

 

12

Corporate Information and Background

 

AudioEye, Inc. was formed as a Delaware corporation on May 20, 2005. On March 31, 2010, CMG Holdings Group, Inc. (“CMGO”) acquired our company. In connectionWe file reports with the acquisition, the former stockholders of our company retained rights to receive cash from the exploitation of our technology (the “Rights”) consisting of 50% of any cash received from income earned, settlements or judgments directly resulting from our patent strategy and a share of our net income for 2010, 2011 and 2012 from the exploitation of our technology. The Rights were then contributed to a newly formed Nevada corporation, AudioEye Acquisition Corporation (“AEAC”) in exchange for shares of AEAC. During the period as a wholly-owned subsidiary of CMGO, we continued to expand our patent portfolio to protect our proprietary Internet content publication and distribution technology.

On June 22, 2011, CMGO entered into a Master Agreement with AEAC pursuant to which: (i) the stockholders of AEAC would acquire from the CMGO 80% of our capital stock (the “Separation”) and (ii) CMGO would distribute to its stockholders, in the form of a dividend, 5% of our capital stock (the “Spin-off”). Pursuant to the Master Agreement, AEAC was required to arrange for the release of senior secured notes (the “Senior Notes”) issued by CMGO in an aggregate principal amount of $1,025,000, which CMGO had been unable to service. On August 17, 2012, we, CMGO and AEAC completed the Separation. In connection with the Separation, AEAC arranged for the release of CMGO under the Senior Notes by payment to the holders thereof of $700,000, the delivery of a secured promissory note in the principal amount of $425,000 and the issuance of 1,500,000 shares of the common stock of AEAC. On February 6, 2013, the note was paid in full. On January 29, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective(“SEC”) and make available, free of charge, on or through our registration statementwebsite at www.audioeye.com, our annual reports on Form S-110-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy and information statements and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, respect to 1,500,259 shares of our common stock to be issued in the Spin-off. On February 22, 2013, CMGO completed the Spin-off.

In connection with the Separation, we entered into a Royalty Agreement with CMGO. Pursuantor furnish it to, the Royalty Agreement, forSEC. In addition, the SEC maintains a period of five years, we would pay to CMGO 10% of cash received from income earned or settlements on judgments directly resulting from our patent enforcement and licensing strategy, whether received by us on any of our affiliates, net in either case of any direct costs or tax implications incurred in pursuit of such strategy as they relate to the patents described in the Master Agreement. Additionally, we entered into a Services Agreement with CMGO whereby, without duplication to the amounts payable under the Royalty Agreement, for a period of 5 years, CMGO will receive a commission of 7.5% of all revenues received by us after the Separation from all business, clients or other sources of revenue procured by CMGO or its employees, officers or subsidiaries and directed to us and 10% of net revenues obtained from a specified customer.

On March 22, 2013, we and AEAC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which AEAC would be merged with and into our company (the “Merger”) with our company being the surviving entity. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each share of AEAC common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Merger effective date would be converted into .94134 share of our common stock and the outstanding convertible debentures of AEAC (the “AEAC Debentures”) in the aggregate principal amount of $1,400,200, together with accrued interest thereon, would be assumed by us and then exchanged for convertible debentures of our company (the “AE Debentures”).

Effective March 25, 2013, the Merger was completed. In connection with the Merger, the stockholders of AEAC received on a pro rata basis the 24,004,143 shares of our common stock that were held by AEAC, and the former holders of the AEAC Debentures received an aggregate of 5,871,752 shares of our common stock pursuant to their conversion of all of the AE Debentures issued to replace the AEAC Debentures. The principal assets of AEAC were the Rights that had been contributed to AEAC by the former stockholders of our company. As a result of the Merger, the Rights have been extinguished.

On November 12, 2013, we and CMGO terminated the Royalty Agreement.

On December 30, 2013, we completed the repurchase of 2,184,583 shares of our common stock owned by CMGO which shares were transferred to us in January, 2014 and retired to treasury. In connection, with the repurchase, we paid CMGO $573,022 and forgave a $50,000 payable from an affiliate of CMGO.

13

Reports to Security Holders

We are not required to deliver an annual report to our stockholders, but will voluntarily send our annual audited financial statements upon request. We are required to file annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the SEC. Our SEC filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

The public may read and copy any materials filed by us with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. We are an electronic filer. The SEC maintains an Internet site that containswww.sec.gov containing reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The Internet address of the site is http://www.sec.gov.


 

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

 

In addition toInvesting in our securities involves a variety of risks and uncertainties, known and unknown, including, among others, those discussed below. Each of the following risks should be carefully considered, together with all the other information included in this Annual Report,Form 10-K, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, our financial statements and the following factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business, financial positionrelated notes and future prospects. Any of the following risks, either alone or taken together, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position or future prospects. If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from what we have projected. Investing in our common stock is highly speculative and involves a high degree of risk. Any potential investor should carefully considerother filings with the SEC. Furthermore, additional risks and uncertainties described below before purchasing any shares of our common stock. There may be additional risks that we do not presently knowknown to us or that we currently believe areto be immaterial which couldmay also materially adversely affect our business, financial position or future prospects. As a result, the trading price of our stock could decline, and you might lose all or part of your investment.business. Our business, financial condition, and operating results, or the value of any investment you make in the stock of our company, or both,cash flow and prospects could be materially and adversely affected by any of the factors listed and described below.these risks or uncertainties.

 

Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm expresses substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Our auditors, MaloneBailey LLP, have indicated in their report on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 that conditions exist that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to our recurring losses from operations. A “going concern” opinion could impair our ability to finance our operations through the sale of equity, incurring debt, or other financing alternatives.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had a working capital deficit of $2,692,090, principally due to the inclusion of non-cash derivative liability recorded in current liabilities. Excluding the derivative liability, the Company’s working capital would have been $786,536. In addition, the Company used actual net cash in operations of $2,340,281 during the year ended December 31, 2016. Even with a greater focus on cash revenue generation and the ongoing cost reductions, the conditions described in the first paragraph, above, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. While the Company has been successful in raising capital in the past, there is no assurance that it will be successful at raising additional capital in the future. Additionally, if the Company’s plans are not achieved and/or if significant unanticipated events occur, the Company may have to further modify its business plan.

14

We have a history of generating significant losses and may not be able to achieve and sustain profitability.

 

To date, we have not been profitable, and we may never achieve profitability on a full-year or consistent basis. We incurred net losses of $9,578,630$7,158,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.2020. As of December 31, 2016,2020, we havehad an accumulated deficit of $33,818,061 and working capital deficit of $2,692,090.$57,084,000. If we continue to experience losses, we may not be able to continue our operations, and investors may lose their entire investment.

 

Our success is dependent on members of our management team and employees, many of whom are relatively new in their positions with the Company.

Our success has depended, and continues to depend, on the efforts and talents of our senior management team and employees, including our engineers, product managers, sales and marketing personnel, and professional services personnel. Many members of our executive management team and our employees are relatively new to their positions, including our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Strategy Officer and our President, both of whom were appointed to their respective positions in August 2020. Our senior management team has not worked with other members of management and our employees for a significant period of time. We can provide no assurance that our management team will be able to effectively work together or with our employees. If they are unable to do so, there may be delays in execution of our business and operating strategies.

We may not receive forgiveness of all or a portion of our PPP Loan.

As discussed in this report, including in Note 6 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included herein, on April 15, 2020, we entered into a note agreement in the amount of $1,302,000 with Liberty Capital Bank (the “PPP Loan”) pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program of the CARES Act, which is being administered by the Small Business Administration. All or a portion of the Loan may be forgiven upon application by the Company in accordance with the Small Business Administration requirements. In October 2020, we submitted our application to obtain forgiveness of the PPP Loan in full. No assurance can be provided, however, that we will obtain forgiveness of all or a portion of the PPP Loan. If we are unable to obtain forgiveness of all or a portion of the PPP Loan, our liquidity could be reduced, and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

We intend to pursue business through a variety of new channels. The new channels may result in the use of a significant amount of our management resources and costs, and we cannot guarantee we will fully realize the expected benefits.

We intend to pursue business through a variety of new channels. Although we may devote significant resources and costs to the development of the new sales channels, we may struggle to successfully identify the channel partners, or to successfully conclude transactions with the channel partners. Should we be unable to identify or conclude important channel partnerships, or if our partners are unable to meet our expectations, our business prospects and operations could be adversely affected as a result of the devotion of significant managerial effort required. In addition, there can be no assurance that we would fully realize the potential benefit of the relationships. If we cannot do so, we may be unable to meet future revenue expectations.

Our new technology platform may not function as expected or may not be accepted by our clients.

We released a new platform for our digital accessibility product in the first quarter of 2021. We cannot guarantee that our platform will operate as expected or that our new platform will be accepted by our customers. If our new platform does not operate as expected or is not accepted, our ability to pursue and retain business may be damaged and our business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.


Our future development requires substantialwill require additional capital, and we may be unable to obtain needed capital or financing on satisfactory terms, or at all, which would prevent us from fully developing our business and generating revenues.

 

As of March 30, 2017, our cash available was $790,698.December 31, 2020, we had $9.1 million in cash. Our business plan will require additional capital expenditures, and our capital outlays could increase substantially over the next several years as we implement our business plan. As a result, and since we do not believe we will operate profitably during that period, we expect that we willmay need to raise substantial additional capital through future private or public equity offerings, strategic alliances or debt financing. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:including, among others: market conditions, sales personnel cost, costand marketing costs, mergers and acquisition activity, if any, costs of litigation in enforcing our patents,intellectual property rights, and information technology (IT) development and acquisition costs. No assurance can be given that we can successfully raise additional equity or debt capital, or that such financing will be available to us on favorable terms, if at all.

Weakened global economic conditions including current and ongoing microeconomic uncertainty may adversely affect our industry, business and results of operations.

 

We are subjectOur overall performance depends in part on worldwide economic and geopolitical conditions. The United States and other key international economies have experienced cyclical downturns from time to ongoing litigation.

In April 2015, two shareholder class action lawsuits were filed againsttime in which economic activity was impacted by falling demand for a variety of goods and services, restricted credit, poor liquidity, reduced corporate profitability, volatility in credit, equity and foreign exchange markets, bankruptcies and overall uncertainty with respect to the Company and former officers Nathaniel Bradley and Edward O’Donnell in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs allege various causes of action against the defendants arising from our announcement that our previously issued financial results for the first three quarters of 2014 and the guidance for the fourth quarter of 2014economy. These economic conditions can arise suddenly, and the full yearimpact of 2014such conditions can remain uncertain. In addition, geopolitical developments, such as existing and potential trade wars and other events beyond our control, such as the coronavirus pandemic, can increase levels of political and economic unpredictability globally and increase the volatility of global financial markets. For example, in response to the coronavirus pandemic, we have shifted certain of our customer events to virtual-only experiences and we may deem it advisable to similarly alter, postpone or cancel entirely additional customer, employee or industry events in the future. Moreover, these conditions can affect the rate of IT spending and could no longer be relied upon. The complaints sought among other relief, compensatory damagesadversely affect our customers’ ability or willingness to attend our events or to purchase our software, delay prospective customers’ purchasing decisions, reduce the value or duration of their subscription contracts, affect attrition rates, or decrease our ability to collect on accounts receivable, all of which could adversely affect our future sales and plaintiff’s counsel’s fees and experts’ fees. The Court appointed a lead plaintiff and lead counsel, and consolidated the actions. A consolidated amended complaint was filed under the captionIn re AudioEye, Inc. Sec. Litigation.The Company and individual defendants filed a motion to dismiss.operating results. 

 

On July 25, 2016, in connection with a voluntary mediation, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the consolidated actions. The settlement agreement isWe have been subject to definitive documentation, shareholder notice,litigation and court approval. The terms of the agreement include a settlement payment to the class of $1,525,000 from the Company’s insurer, with no admission of liability by any party. In 2015, the Company paid a deductible under its D&O insurance policymay in the amount of $100,000 regarding this matter.

On January 23, 2017, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement pursuantfuture be subject to the terms set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement, provisionally certifiedadditional litigation, which could have a settlement class of shareholders, and directed plaintiffs' counsel to provide notice to that class. The Court will hold a Final Settlement Hearingmaterial adverse effect on May 8, 2017 to consider any objections to the Settlement that might be raised by settlement class members, to consider plaintiffs’ counsel's application for an award of fees and costs, and to finally determine whether the Order and Final Judgment as provided under the Stipulation of Settlement should be entered, dismissing the case with prejudice.

On May 16, 2016, a shareholder derivative complaint entitled LiPoChing, Derivatively and on Behalf of AudioEye, Inc., v. Bradley, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. As a derivative complaint, the plaintiff-shareholder purported to act on behalf of the Company against the Named Individuals. The Company was named as a nominal defendant. The complaint asserted causes of action including breach of fiduciary duty and others, arising from the Company’s restatement of itsour financial results for the first three quarters of 2014. The complaint sought, among other relief, compensatory damages, restitution and attorneys’ fees. In October 2016, the Company and Named Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. In response, the Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the complaint without prejudice.

On July 26, 2016, a shareholder derivative complaint entitled Denese M. Hebert, derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant AudioEye, Inc., v. Bradley, et al., was filed in the State of Arizona Superior Court for Pima County. The complaint generally asserts causes of action related to the Company’s restatement of its financial statements for the first three fiscal quarters of 2014. As a derivative complaint, the plaintiff-shareholder purports to act on behalf of the Company against the Named Individuals.

The Company is named as a nominal defendant. The Company understands that the Named Individuals intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in February 2017, which presently is scheduled to be heard in May 2017. While the Company believes that its legal defense costs may be reimbursed by the Company’s insurance carrier, no reasonable estimate of the outcome of the litigation, the related legal fees,position or the impact on the financial results of the Company can be made as of the date of this statement.operations.

15

 

We may become involved in various other routine disputes and allegations incidentalrelated to our business operations. WhileBecause we are in a technology industry, these disputes may involve claims of intellectual property infringement or misappropriation. We have also been involved in securities law litigation in the past. These types of litigation can be very expensive, and we cannot assure you that our insurance policies will cover the costs. Because it is not possible to determine when and whether these disputes and allegations may arise or the ultimate disposition of thesesuch matters, our management believes that the resolution of any such matters, should they arise, is not likely tocould have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Current economic and credit conditions could adversely affect our plan of operations.

Our ability to secure additional financing and satisfy our financial obligations under indebtedness outstanding from time to time will depend upon our future operating performance, which is subject to the prevailing general economic and credit market conditions, including interest rate levels and the availability of credit generally, and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. The prolonged continuation or worsening of current credit market conditions would have a material adverse effect on our ability to secure financing on favorable terms, if at all.

Our revenue and collections may be materially adversely affected by an economic downturn.

Current macroeconomic conditions continue to show signs of volatility and potential weakness. We believe commercial purchasing habits and corporate information technology budgets have improved modestly in recent years, but remain relatively constrained and subject to such volatile and uncertain economic conditions. Any deterioration in prevailing economic conditions would likely result in reduced demand for our services and products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business financial position or results of operations.

An increase in market interest rates could increase our interest costs on future debt and could adversely affect our stock price.

 

If interest rates increase, so could our interest costs for any new debt. This increased cost could make financing, including the financing of any acquisition, costlier. We may incur variable interest rate indebtedness in the future. Rising interest rates could limit our ability to refinance debt when it matures or cause us to pay higher interest rates upon refinancing and increased interest expense on refinanced indebtedness.

 

16

 

We are dependent on certain members of our management and technical team.

Investors in our common stock must rely upon the ability, expertise, judgment and discretion of our management and the success of our technical team in exploiting our technology. Our performance and success are dependent, in part, upon key members of our management and technical team. The departure of key persons could be detrimental to our future success. Members of our current management hold a significant percentage of our common stock. We cannot assure you that our management will remain in place. We do not maintain “key person” life insurance policies. The loss of any of our management and technical team members could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition, as well as on the market price of our common stock.

We intend tomay pursue new strategic opportunities which may result in the use of a significant amount of our management resources or significant costs, and we may not be able to fully realize the potential benefit of such transactions.opportunities.

 

We intend tomay seek other strategic partnersopportunities to help us pursue our strategic, marketing, sales or technicalbusiness objectives. Although we may devote significant time and resources in pursuit of such transactions, we may struggle to successfully identify such opportunities, or to successfully conclude transactions with potential strategic partners.transactions. Should we be unable to identify or conclude important strategic transactions, our business prospects and operations could be adversely affected as a result of the devotion of significant managerial effort required, and the challenges of achieving our objectives in the absence of strategic partners.opportunities. In addition, we may incur significant costs in connection with seeking acquisitions or other strategic opportunities regardless of whether the transaction is completed, and in combining its operations with ours if such a transaction is completed. In the event that we consummate an acquisition or strategic alternativerelationship in the future, we cannot assure you that we would fully realize the potential benefit of such a transaction.transaction or that we would not be subject to unknown liabilities.

Our business plan may not be realized. If our business plan proves to be unsuccessful, our business may fail, and you may lose your entire investment.

 

Our operations are subject to all of the risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise with a limited operating history. The likelihood of our success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, complications, and delays frequently encountered in connection with the development of a new business. Unanticipated events may occur that could affect the actual results achieved during the forecast periods. Consequently, the actual results of operations during the forecast periods will vary from the forecasts, and such variations may be material. In addition, the degree of uncertainty increases with each successive year presented.presented in our business plan. We cannot assure you that we will succeed in the anticipated operation of our business plan. If our business plan proves to be unsuccessful, our business may fail, and you may lose your entire investment.

 

We have experienced and will continue to experience competition as more companies seek to provide products and services similar to our products and services, and because larger and better-financed competitors may affect our ability to compete in the marketplace and achieve profitability, our business may fail.

Competition in our market is intense, and we expect competition for our products and services to become even more intense. We compete directly against other companies offering similar products and services that compete or will compete directly with our proposed products and services. We also compete against established vendors in our markets. These companies may incorporate other competitive technologies into their product offerings, whether developed internally or by third parties. There are also established consultants who offer services to help their customers obtain compliance with accessibility standards. In many cases these consultants compete for the same funding from our prospective customers. For the foreseeable future, many of our competitors may be larger, better-financed companies that may develop products superior to our current and proposed products, which could create significant competitive advantages for those companies. Our future success depends on our ability to compete effectively with our competitors. As a result, we may have difficulty competing with larger, established competitors. Generally, these competitors may have:

·substantially greater financial, technical, and marketing resources;
·a larger customer base;
·better name recognition; and
·more expansive or different product offerings.

These competitors may command a larger market share than we do, which may enable them to establish a stronger competitive position, in part, through greater marketing opportunities. Further, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly than we are to new or emerging technologies and changes in user preferences and to devote greater resources to developing new products and offering new services. These competitors may develop products or services that are comparable or superior to ours. If we fail to address competitive developments quickly and effectively, we may not be able to remain a viable business.

If we are not able to adequately protect our patented rights, our operations wouldmay be negatively impacted.

 

Our ability to compete largely depends on the superiority, uniqueness and value of our technology and intellectual property. To protect our intellectual property rights, we will rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret laws, confidentiality agreements with our employees and third parties, and protective contractual provisions. We cannot assure you that infringement or invalidity claims (or claims for indemnification resulting from infringement claims) will not be asserted or prosecuted against us or that any such assertions or prosecutions will not materially adversely affect our business.

 

8

Regardless of whether these or any future claims are valid or can be successfully asserted, defending against such claims could cause us to incur significant costs, could jeopardize or substantially delay a successful outcome in any future litigation, and could divert resources away from our other activities. In addition, assertion of infringement claims could result in injunctions that prevent us from distributing our products. In addition to challenges against our existing patents, any of the following could also reduce the value of our intellectual property now, or in the future:

17

 

 ·our applications for patents, trademarks, and copyrights relating to our business may not be granted and, if granted, may be challenged or invalidated;

 ·issued trademarks, copyrights or patents may not provide us with any competitive advantages;

 

 ·our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights may not be effective in preventing misappropriation of our technology; or

 ·our efforts may not prevent the development and design by others of products or technologies similar to, competitive with, or superior to those that we develop.

��

Also, we may not be able to effectively protect our intellectual property rights in certain foreign countries where we may do business in the future or from which competitors may operate. Obtaining patents will not necessarily protect our technology or prevent our international competitors from developing similar products or technologies. Our inability to adequately protect our patented rights wouldmay have a negative impact on our operations and revenues.

 

In addition, legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability, and scope of protection of intellectual property rights in Internet-related businesses are uncertain and still evolving. Because of the growth of the Internet and Internet-related businesses, patent applications are continuously and simultaneously being filed in connection with Internet-related technology. There are a significant number of U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications in our areas of interest, and we believe that there has been, and is likely to continue to be, significant litigation in the industry regarding patent and other intellectual property rights.

We may commence legal proceedings against third parties who we believe are infringing on our intellectual property rights, and if we are forced to litigate to defend our intellectual property rights, or to defend claims by third parties against us relating to intellectual property rights, legal fees and court injunctions could adversely affect our financial condition orand potentially end our business.

 

At present, we do notWe have any active or pending litigation against a competitor related to the alleged violation of our patents.patents and other unfair trade practices, and we may engage in future litigation. We expect an increase in the number of third parties who could violate our patents as the market develops new uses of similar products and consumers begincontinue to increase their adoption of the technology and integrate it into their daily lives. We do foresee the potential need to enter into additional active litigation to defend the enforcement ofand enforce our patents. We anticipate that these legal proceedings could continue for several years and may require significant expenditures for legal fees and other expenses. In the event we are not successful through appeal and do not subsequently obtain monetary and injunctive relief, these litigation matters may significantly reduce our financial resources and have a material impact on our ability to continue our operations. The time and effort required of our management to effectively pursue or defend these litigation matters may adversely affect our ability to operate our business, since time spent on matters related to the lawsuits willwould take away from the time spent on managing and operating the business. We cannot assure thatyou any such potential lawsuits will result in a finalan outcome that is favorable to our shareholdersstockholders or the company.

We have experienced and will continue to experience competition as more companies seek to provide products and services similar to our products and services; and because larger and better-financed competitors may affect our ability to operate our business and achieve profitability, our business may fail.Company.

 

We expect competition for our products and services to become more intense. We compete directly against other companies offering similar products and services that will compete directly with our proposed products and services. We also compete against established vendors in our markets. These companies may incorporate other competitive technologies into their product offerings, whether developed internally or by third parties. There are also established consultants who offer services to help their customers obtain compliance with accessibilities standards. In many cases these consultants compete for the same funding from our prospective customers. For the foreseeable future, substantially all of our competitors are likely to be larger, better-financed companies that may develop products superior to our current and proposed products, which could create significant competitive advantages for those companies. Our future success depends on our ability to compete effectively with our competitors. As a result, we may have difficulty competing with larger, established competitors. Generally, these competitors have:

18

·substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources;

·a larger customer base;

·better name recognition; and

·more expansive or different product offerings.

These competitors may command a larger market share than us, which may enable them to establish a stronger competitive position, in part, through greater marketing opportunities. Further, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in user preferences and to devote greater resources to developing new products and offering new services. These competitors may develop products or services that are comparable or superior to ours. If we fail to address competitive developments quickly and effectively, we may not be able to remain a viable business.

The burdens of being a public company may adversely affect our ability to develop our business and pursue a litigation strategy.

As a public company, our management must devote substantial time, attention and financial resources to comply with U.S. securities laws. This may have a material adverse effect on our management’s ability to effectively and efficiently develop our business initiatives. In addition, our disclosure obligations under U.S. securities laws may require us to disclose information publicly that could have a material adverse effect on our potential litigation strategies.

The current regulatory environment for our products and services remains unclear.

 

We cannot assure you that our existing or planned product and service offerings will be in compliance with local, state, and/or federal U.S. laws or the laws of any foreign jurisdiction where we operate or may operate in the future. Further, we cannot assure you that we will not unintentionally violate such laws or that such laws will not be modified, or that new laws will not be enacted in the future, which would cause us to be in violation of such laws. More aggressive domestic or international regulation of the Internet may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, and future prospects.

As pressure of legal ramifications from non-compliance with Web Accessibility increases, clients may be less inclined to permit or may delay AudioEye from promoting client relationships and/or the specifics associated with those relationships, and if this restricts our public communications with investors and shareholders, it may negatively impact our ability to gain interest in our business from investors and shareholders.

Due to an undefined regulatory environment and a heightened sensitivity by plaintiffs seeking retribution for inaccessible and unusable digital interfaces, any organization may be sued or served legal demands claiming non-compliance. As these demands may be served with or without merit, they present a new level of risk for website owners and publishers. In an effort to avoid any potential unwanted attention pertaining to the subject of compliance, AudioEye clients may enforce rigid stipulations pertaining to AudioEye’s promotion of their involvement or engagement with AudioEye, regardless of the level of success or positive impact any such engagement may have or have had on their business. Whether through the enforcement of non-disclosure agreements or through specific non-disclosure language associated with client contracts, if AudioEye is not empowered to promptly make public announcements about its client base and the adoption of AudioEye products and services, it may have a deleterious effect on the company’s capacity to accelerate its business growth or attract investment from shareholders.


Our business greatly depends on the growth of online services, Internet of Things (“IOT”), kiosks, streaming, file transfer and other next-generation Internet-based applications.applications, and there is a risk that such growth may not occur as expected, or at all, which would harm our business.

 

The Internet may ultimately prove not to be a viable commercial marketplace for such applications for a number ofseveral reasons, including:

 

19

 ·unwillingness of consumers to shift to and use other such next-generation Internet-based audio applications;

 ·refusal to purchase our products and services;

 ·perception by end-users with respect to product and service quality and performance;

 ·limitations on access and ease of use;

 ·congestion leading to delayed or extended response times;

 ·inadequate development of Internet infrastructure to keep pace with increased levels of use; and

 ·increased government regulations.

Because of these and other factors, the growth of online services, IOT, kiosks, streaming, and other next-generation Internet-based applications may be impeded or not occur as expected. As a result, our business and operations could be adversely impacted.

If the market for our online services does not grow as anticipated, our business would be adversely affected.

 

While other next-generation Internet-based applications have grown rapidly in personal and professional use, we cannot assure you that the adoption of our products and services will grow at a comparable rate or grow at all.

We expect that we will experience long and unpredictable sales cycles, which may impact our operating results.

We expect that our sales cycles will be long and unpredictable due to a number of uncertainties such as:

·the need to educate potential customers about the current state of accessibility for those with disabilities.;

·customers’ willingness to invest potentially substantial resources and infrastructures to take advantage of our products and services;

·customers’ budgetary constraints;

·the timing of customers’ budget cycles; and

·delays caused by customers’ internal review and procurement processes.

We historically have been dependent on a concentrated number of customers, and have stopped doing business with the customers who have represented a significant portion of our revenues during the past two years as the Company migrates to a SaaS model.

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, two major customers generated approximately 45.3% and 67.5% of our revenue, respectively. In 2015, we mutually agreed to terminate our business relationship with the largest of these customers, representing 56.3% of our revenues in 2015. We have fundamentally shifted our business model to focus on software as a service (SaaS) product offerings. We have not yet proven that we can develop and maintain a diversified customer base who will subscribe to our SaaS–centric products and services. If we are unable to establish, maintain, grow or replace our relationships with customers and develop a diversified customer base, our revenues may fluctuate and our growth may be limited.

Our expansion into new products, services, technologies, and geographic regions subjects us to additional business, legal, financial, and competitive risks.

 

We may have limited or no experience in our newer market segments, and our customers may not adopt our new offerings. These offerings may present new and difficult technology challenges, and we may be subject to claims if customers of these offerings experience service disruptions or failures or other quality issues. In addition, profitability, if any, in our newer activities may be lower than in our older activities, and we may not be successful enough in these newer activities to recoup our investments in them. If any of this were to occur, it could damage our reputation, limit our growth, and negatively affect our operating results.

 

20

We face risks related to system interruption and lack of redundancy.

 

We experience occasional system interruptions and delays that make our websites and services unavailable or slow to respond and prevent us from efficiently providing services to third parties, which may reduce our net sales and the attractiveness of our products and services. If we are unable to continually add software and hardware, effectively upgrade our systems and network infrastructure, and take other steps to improve the efficiency of our systems, it could cause system interruptions or delays and adversely affect our operating results.

 

Our computer and communications systems and operations could be damaged or interrupted by fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure, earthquakes, acts of war or terrorism, acts of God, computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, and similar events or disruptions. Any of these events could cause system interruption, delays, and loss of critical data, and could prevent us from providing services, which could make our product and service offerings less attractive and subject us to liability. Our systems are not fully redundant, and our disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient. In addition, we may have inadequate insurance coverage to compensate for any related losses. Any of these events could damage our reputation and be expensive to remedy.

Government regulation is evolving, and unfavorable changes could harm our business.

 

We are subject to general business regulations and laws, as well as regulations and laws specifically governing the Internet, e-commerce, electronic devices, and other services. Existing and future laws and regulations may impede our growth. These regulations and laws may cover website accessibility, taxation, privacy, data protection, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, mobile communications, electronic device certification, electronic waste, energy consumption, environmental regulation, electronic contracts and other communications, competition, consumer protection, web services, the provision of online payment services, information reporting requirements, unencumbered Internet access to our services, the design and operation of websites, the characteristics and quality of products and services, and the commercial operation of unmanned aircraft systems. It is not clear how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, libel, and personal privacy apply to the Internet, e-commerce, digital content, and web services. Unfavorable regulations and laws could diminish the demand for our products and services and increase our cost of doing business.


We could be subject to additional sales tax or other indirect tax liabilities.

 

U.S. Supreme Court decisions restrict the imposition of obligations to collect state and local sales taxes with respect to remote sales. However, an increasing number of states have considered or adopted laws or administrative practices that attempt to impose obligations on out-of-state businesses to collect taxes on their behalf. A successful assertion by one or more states or foreign countries requiring us to collect taxes where we do not currently do so could result in substantial tax liabilities, including for past sales, as well as penalties and interest.

 

We may be subject to risks related to government contracts and related procurement regulations.

 

Our contracts with U.S., as well as state, local, and foreign, government entities are subject to various procurement regulations and other requirements relating to their formation, administration, and performance. We may be subject to audits and investigations relating to our government contracts, and any violations could result in various civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contract,contracts, refunding or suspending of payments, forfeiture of profits, payment of fines, and suspension or debarment from future government business. In addition, such contracts may provide for termination by the government at any time, without cause.

 

21

If we do not successfully adapt, enhance or develop our plannednew products and services in a cost-effective manner to meet customer demand in the rapidly evolving market for next-generation Internet-based applications and services, our business may fail.

 

The market for next-generation Internet-based applications and services is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, changes in customer needs, and frequent new service and product introductions. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to use new technologies effectively, to continue to develop our technical expertise and proprietary technology, to enhance our existing products and services, and to develop new products and services that meet changing customer needs on a timely and cost-effective basis. We may not be able to adapt quickly enough to changing technology, customer requirements, and industry standards. If we fail to use new technologies effectively, to develop our technical expertise and new products and services, or to enhance existing products and services inon a timely basis, either internally or through arrangements with third parties, our product and service offerings may fail to meet customer needs, which would adversely affect our revenues and prospects for growth.

In addition, if we are unable to, for technological, legal, financial, or other reasons, adapt in a timely manner to changing market conditions or customer requirements, we could lose customers, strategic alliances, and market share. Sudden changes in user and customer requirements and preferences, the frequent introduction of new products and services embodying new technologies, and the emergence of new industry standards and practices could render our existing products, services and systems obsolete. The emerging nature of products and services in the technology and communications industry and their rapid evolution will require that we continually improve the performance, features, and reliability of our products and services. Our survival and success will depend, in part, on our ability to:

 

 ·design, develop, launch and/or license our planned products, services, and technologies that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our prospective customers; and

 

 ·respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely basis.

 

The development of our planned products and services and other patented technology involves significant technological and business risks and requires substantial expenditures and lead time. We may be unable to use new technologies effectively. Updating our technology internally and licensing new technology from third parties may also require us to incur significant additional expenditures.

If our products and services do not continue to gain market acceptance, we may not be able to fund future operations.

 

A number of factors may affect the market acceptance of our products or services or any other products or services we develop or acquire, including, among others:

 

 ·the price of our products or services relative to other competitive products;products and services;

 

 ·the perception by users of the effectiveness of our products and services;

 

 ·our ability to fund our sales and marketing efforts; and

 

 ·the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts.

 

If our products and services do not continue to gain market acceptance, we may not be able to fund future operations, including the development of new products and services and/or our sales and marketing efforts for our current products and services, which inability would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.

 


We continually develop new products and product enhancements and actively capitalize software development costs, while making educated assumptions to anticipate the attributed revenue to be derived from each development or enhancement. If our assumptions are incorrect or if we are unable to accurately attribute revenue to each respective product or product enhancement, we may have to account for impairment, thus causing us to reverse the capitalized expenditures.

22

 

Our product developers are consistently programming new products and enhancements to existing products. Under applicable accounting guidance, we make determinations to estimate the useful life of each of these products and enhancements. Based on these determinations, we amortize software expenses over a pre-determined period of time. Should our estimates turn out to be inaccurate or should the business fail to attract new revenue in relation to each respective product or product enhancement, we may have to reverse or write off the related capitalized expenses.

Our products and services are highly technical and may contain undetected errors, which could cause harm to our reputation and adversely affect our business.

 

Our products and services are highly technical and complex and, when deployed, may contain errors or defects. Despite testing, some errors in our products and services may only be discovered after they have been installed and used by customers. Any errors or defects discovered in our products and services after commercial release could result in failure to achieve market acceptance, loss of revenue or delay in revenue recognition, loss of customers, and increased service and warranty cost, any of which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, we could face claims for product liability, tort, or breach of warranty. The performance of our products and services could have unforeseen or unknown adverse effects on the networks over which they are delivered as well as on third-party applications and services that utilize our products and services, which could result in legal claims against us, harming our business. Furthermore, we expect to provide implementation, consulting, and other technical services in connection with the implementation and ongoing maintenance of our products and services, which typically involves working with sophisticated software, computing systems, and communications systems. We expect thatMany of our contracts with customers will contain provisions relating to warranty disclaimers and liability limitations, whichbut such provisions may not be upheld. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, is costly and may divert our management’s attention and adversely affect the market’s perception of us and our products and services. In addition, if our business liability insurance coverage proves inadequate or future coverage is unavailable on acceptable terms or at all, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely impacted.

Malfunctions of third-party communications infrastructure, hardware and software expose us to a variety of risks we cannot control.control, and those risks could result in harm to our business.

 

Our business will dependdepends upon the capacity, reliability and security of the infrastructure owned by third parties over which our product offerings would beare deployed. We have no control over the operation, quality or maintenance of a significant portion of that infrastructure or over whether or not those third parties will upgrade or improve their equipment. We do depend on these companies to maintain the operational integrity of our integrated connections. If one or more of these companies is unable or unwilling to supply or expand its levels of service in the future, our operations could be adversely impacted. Also, to the extent the number of users of networks utilizing our future products and services suddenly increases, the technology platform and secure hosting services which will be required to accommodate a higher volume of traffic may result in slower response times or service interruptions. System interruptions or increases in response time could result in a loss of potential or existing users and, if sustained or repeated, could reduce the appeal of the networks to users. In addition, users depend on real-time communications; outages caused by increased traffic could result in delays and system failures. These types of occurrences could cause users to perceive that our products and services do not function properly and could therefore adversely affect our ability to attract and retain licensees, strategic partners and customers.

Security breaches, computer viruses, and computer hacking attacks could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, or reputation.

Security breaches, computer malware and computer hacking attacks have become more prevalent in our industry. Any security breach caused by hacking, which involves efforts to gain unauthorized access to information or systems, or to cause intentional malfunctions or loss or corruption of data, software, hardware or other computer equipment, or the inadvertent transmission of computer viruses could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or reputation.

Our corporate systems, third-party systems and security measures may be breached due to the actions of outside parties, employee error, malfeasance, a combination of these, or otherwise, and, as a result, an unauthorized party may obtain access to our data or any third-party data we may possess. Any such security breach could require us to comply with various breach notification laws and may expose us to litigation, remediation and investigation costs, increased costs for security measures, loss of revenue, damage to our reputation, and potential liability.

System failure or interruption or our failure to meet increasing demands on our systems could harm our business.

 

The success of our product and service offerings will dependdepends on the uninterrupted operation of various systems, secure data centers, and other computer and communication networks that we use or establish. To the extent the number of users of networks utilizing our future products and services suddenly increases, the technology platform and hosting services which will be required to accommodate a higher volume of traffic may result in slower response times, service interruptions or delays or system failures. The deployment of our products, services, systems and operations will also be vulnerable to damage or interruption from:

 


 ·power loss, transmission cable cuts and other telecommunications failures;

 

 ·damage or interruption caused by fire, earthquake and other natural disasters;

 

 ·computer viruses or software defects; and

 

 ·physical or electronic break-ins, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism, terrorist attacks and other events beyond our control.

 

23

System interruptions or failures and increases or delays in response time could result in a loss of potential or existing users and, if sustained or repeated, could reduce the appeal of our products and services to users. These types of occurrences could cause users to perceive that our products and services do not function properly and could therefore adversely affect our ability to attract and retain licensees, strategic partners and customers.customers

Our abilityWe do not expect to sell our solutions will be dependent on the qualitypay any dividends to holders of our technical support andcommon stock for the foreseeable future, which will affect the extent to which our failure to deliver high-quality technical support services could have a material adverse effectinvestors realize any future gains on our sales and results of operations.their investment.

 

If weWe do not effectively assist our customers in deploying our products and services, succeed in helping our customers quickly resolve post-deployment issues and provide effective ongoing support, or if potential customers perceiveanticipate that we may not be ablewill pay any dividends to successfully deliver the foregoing,holders of our ability to sell our products and services would be adversely affected, and our reputation with potential customers could be harmed. In addition, if we expand our operations internationally, our technical support team will face additional challenges, including those associated with delivering support, training and documentation in languages other than the English language. As a result, our failure to deliver and maintain high-quality technical support services to our customers could result in customers choosing to use our competitors’ products or servicescommon stock in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investment.

We will need to recruit and retain additional qualified personnel to successfully grow our business.

 

Our future success will depend in part on our ability to attract and retain qualified operations, marketing and sales personnel as well as technical personnel. Inability to attract and retain such personnel could adversely affect our business. Competition for technical, sales, marketing and executive personnel is intense, particularly in the technology and Internet sectors. We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract or retain such personnel.

 

Growth of internal operations and business may strain our financial resources.

We may need to significantly expand the scope of our operating and financial systems in order to build our business. Our growth rate may place a significant strain on our financial resources for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to, the following:

·the need for continued development of our financial and information management systems;

·the need to manage relationships with future licensees, resellers, distributors and strategic partners;

·the need to hire and retain skilled management, technical and other personnel necessary to support and manage our business; and

·the need to train and manage our employee base.

The addition of products and services and the attention they demand, may also strain our management resources.

We do not expectIf we fail to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future, which will affect the extent to which our investors realize any future gains on their investment.

We do not anticipate that we will pay any dividends to holders of our convertible preferred and common stock in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, investors must rely the ability to convert preferred stock to common stock and on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investment. 

24

We previously identified material weaknesses in ourmaintain effective internal control over financial reporting which resulted in a restatement of our previously issued quarterly financial statements during 2014. If our remedial measures were insufficientand effective disclosure controls and procedures, we may not be able to address the material weaknesses, or if additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting are discovered or occur in the future, our consolidated financial statements may contain errors and we could be required to further restate ourreport financial results accurately or on a timely basis, or to detect fraud, which could adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our business and stock price.

 

In 2015, we concluded that there were material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as we did not maintain effective controls over the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) related to revenue recognition for certain non-monetary transactions. Specifically, the members of our management teamconnection with the requisite level of accounting knowledge, experience and training commensurate with our financial reporting requirements did not analyze certain accounting transactions at the level of detail required to ensure the proper application of GAAP in certain circumstances. Errors in the application of the accounting principles and errors which impacted revenues recognition were related to our failure to maintain effective internal controls over the accounting for revenue recognition. Our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2014 were amended to reflect the restatement of our financial statements for the restated periods and the change in management’s conclusion regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.

The Company took steps to remediate the weaknesses described above. Multiple levels of supervision have been implemented and the firm has improved cross reconciliations of internal parties’ actions and approvals. Singular levels of approval, supervision and processing have been eliminated. All contracts are thoroughly reviewed by management and at certain levels require Board approval. The Company no longer engages in non-monetary transactions related to Intellectual Property. All sales transactions are representative of cash contracts in the form of Subscription and Services Agreements. Revenue is recognized by following stringent guidelines which include the appropriate application of journal entries in sales, deferred revenue and accounts receivable in the General Ledger. Revenue is recognized as a portion of the contract term as services are delivered, and deferred revenue is recorded, only upon the receipt of cash. Timing and accounts affected by the respective journal entry are triggered when payment is received and applied to invoices in accounts receivable.

With ourthis annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,report, our management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.procedures and of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that, primarily due to material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as described in this annual report, our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2016 in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.2020.

  

In addition,Our failure to establish and maintain the remediation steps werequired internal control over financial reporting, and to establish and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures, or any failure of those controls or procedures once established, could adversely impact our public disclosures regarding our business, financial condition or results of operations. Upon review of the required internal control over financial reporting, our management and/or our auditors have takenin the past and continuemay in the future identify material weaknesses and/or significant deficiencies that need to takebe addressed. Any actual or perceived weaknesses or conditions that need to be addressed in our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure of management's assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting or disclosure of our independent registered public accounting firm's attestation to or report on management's assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, or our failure to obtain such an attestation or report, could adversely impact the price of and our ability to list our common stock and may lead to stockholder claims and regulatory action against us. Failure to remediate our current material weaknesses or to maintain effective internal controls in the future could also result in a material misstatement of our annual or quarterly financial statements that would not be insufficientprevented or detected on a timely basis and that could cause us to prevent future restatements restate our financial statements for a prior period, cause investors to lose confidence in our financial statements and/or delays inlimit our ability to raise capital.

Additionally, any such failure may also negatively impact our operating results and financial reporting. Restatements or delays in filing the requisite materialscondition, impair our ability to timely file our periodic and other reports with the SEC, could reoccurconsume a significant amount of management's time, and may impact our abilitycause us to be allowedincur substantial additional costs relating to trade on various trading platforms. Such limitation may impact the trading priceimplementation of our shares.remedial measures.

 


Risks Related to the Market for Our Common Stock

 

OurAlthough our shares of common stock are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, historically we have had a limited trading volume and a higher price volatility. This may be volatile, and purchasersresult in reduced liquidity of our common stock.

Although our shares of common stock are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “AEYE,” historicallytrading volume in our common stock has been limited. In addition, our stock has also historically seen significant price volatility, which may reduce the liquidity of our common stock. The sale of a significant number of shares of common stock at any particular time could incur substantial losses.be difficult to achieve at the market prices prevailing immediately before such shares are offered, and may limit your liquidity options. 

If we cannot continue to satisfy the continuing listing criteria of the Nasdaq Capital Market, the exchange may subsequently delist our common stock.

 

OurThe Nasdaq Capital Market requires us to meet certain financial, public float, bid price and liquidity standards on an ongoing basis in order to continue the listing of our common stock. Generally, we must maintain a minimum amount of stockholders’ equity and a minimum number of holders of our securities, as well as meet certain disclosure and corporate governance requirements. If we fail to meet any of the continuing listing requirements, our common stock started being listed on the OTCQB and the OTC Bulletin Board effective April 15, 2013 under the symbol “AEYE.” Beginning on April 16, 2015,may be subject to delisting. If our common shares werestock is delisted and we are not able to list our common stock on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities would be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, our stockholders could face significant material adverse consequences, including limited availability of market quotations for our common stock and reduced liquidity for the OTC Pink marketplace duetrading of our securities. In addition, we could experience a decreased ability to our inability to timely file certain documents withissue additional securities and obtain additional financing in the SEC. We resumed trading on the OTCQB effective July 23, 2015.future.

 

As a result of this volatility, investors may not be able to sell their common stock. The market price for our common stock may be influencedfluctuate significantly, which could result in substantial losses by many factors, including, but not limited to:our investors.

 

25

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as:

 

·regulatory developments in the United States and any foreign countries where we may operate;outcomes of potential future patent litigation;

 

·our ability to monetize our future patents;

·changes in our industry;

·announcements of technological innovations, new products or product enhancements by us or others;

·announcements by us of significant strategic partnerships, out-licensing, in-licensing, joint ventures, acquisitions or capital commitments;

·changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by security analysts, if our common stock is covered by analysts;

·investors’ general perception of us;

·

future issuances of common stock;

·investors’ future resales of our securities;

·the recruitmentaddition or departure of key personnel;

 

·quarterly or annual variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;

·general market conditions, inincluding the industries in which we competevolatility of market prices for shares of technology companies, generally, and issuance of new or changed securities;

·analysts’ reports or recommendations;

·the failure of securities analystsother factors, including factors unrelated to cover our common stock or changes in financial estimates by analysts;

·the inability to meet the financial estimates of analysts who follow our common stock, if any;

·the issuance of any additional securities by us;

·investor perception of us and of the industry in which we compete;operating performance; and

 

·general economic, political and market conditions.the other factors described in this “Risk Factors” section.

 

Trading on the OTCQBThese factors and OTC Bulletin Boardany corresponding price fluctuations may be volatilematerially and sporadic, which could depressadversely affect the market price of our common sharesstock and make it difficult forresult in substantial losses by our stockholders to resell their shares.investors.

 

TradingFurther, the stock market in shares quoted ongeneral, and the OTCQBmarket for technology companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and OTC Bulletin Board is often thin and characterized by widevolume fluctuations in the past. Continued market fluctuations could result in extreme volatility in the price of our common stock, which could cause a decline in the value of our common stock.


Price volatility of our common stock might be worse if the trading prices, duevolume of our common stock is low. In the past, following periods of market volatility, stockholders have often instituted securities class action litigation. We have previously been the target of securities litigation and may in the future be subject to many factors that may have littleadditional securities litigation, which could result in substantial costs to do withus and divert resources and attention of management from our operations or business, prospects. This volatilityeven if we are successful in any such litigation. Future sales of our common stock could depressalso reduce the market price of sharessuch stock.

Moreover, the liquidity of our common stock is limited, not only in terms of the number of shares that can be bought and sold at a given price, but by delays in the timing of transactions and reduction in security analysts’ and the media’s coverage of us, if any. These factors may result in lower prices for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover,our common stock than might otherwise be obtained and could also result in a larger spread between the OTCQBbid and OTC Bulletin Board are notask prices for our common stock. In addition, without a large float, our common stock exchanges, and trading of securities on the OTCQB and OTC Bulletin Board is often more sporadicless liquid than the stock of companies with broader public ownership and, as a result, the trading of securities listed on exchanges like NASDAQ or NYSE MKT. Accordingly, stockholders may have difficulty reselling sharesprice of our common stock may be more volatile. In the absence of an active public trading market, an investor may be unable to liquidate its investment in our common stock. Trading of a relatively small volume of our common stock may have a greater impact on the trading price of our stock than would be the case if our public float were larger. We cannot predict the prices at which our common stock will trade in the future.

ASales or the availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may be sold intocause the price of our common stock to decline and adversely affect our ability to raise capital.

If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, at any time. Thisincluding pursuant to our currently effective Registration Statement on Form S-3, such sales or the anticipation of such sales could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even iffall. Such circumstances, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, also could make more difficult our business is doing well.ability to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.

 

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our common stock.

Our stock is a penny stock; trading of shares of our common stock may be restricted by the SEC’s penny stock regulations, which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our shares.

Our stock is a penny stock. The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors.” The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC, which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the shares that are subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common shares.

26

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell shares of our common stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules promulgated by the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or the FINRA, has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, the FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some brokerage customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy shares of our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell shares of our common stock.

When we issue additional shares of common stock in the future, including under our at-the-market program, in future financings or upon conversion of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, it will likely result in the dilution of our existing stockholders and may also result in a reduction in the market price of our common stock.

 

Our certificateCertificate of incorporationIncorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 250,000,00050,000,000 shares of common stock with a $0.00001 par value per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred sharesstock with a $0.00001 par value of $0.00001,per share, of which, 111,512,001 common shares were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 20162020, approximately 10,130,000 shares of common stock and 160,00090,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (convertible into 9,826,776 shares of common stock) were issued and outstandingoutstanding. Such shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, based upon the applicable conversion rate as of December 31, 2016. 2020, were at such time convertible into an aggregate of approximately 263,000 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2020, we also had outstanding warrants and options to purchase an aggregate of approximately 598,000 shares of our common stock and unvested, or vested but not yet settled, restricted stock units covering an aggregate of approximately 958,000 shares of common stock. The exercise of such options and warrants and the vesting or vesting and settlement of such restricted stock units would further increase the number of our outstanding shares of common stock.

In addition, in February 2021, we entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement under which the Company may offer and sell, from time to time at its sole discretion, shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $30 million.

From time to time, we may adopt new equity compensation plans or increase the number of shares available for issuance in connection with our existing equity compensation plans. Our board of directors may fix and determine the designations, rights, preferences or other variations of each class or series within each class of preferred stock and mayalso choose to issue some or all of suchour available shares to provide additional financing or acquire more businesses in the future.

 

Moreover, as of December 31, 2016, we had warrants and options to purchase an aggregate of 90,164,248 shares of our common stock, the exercise of which would further increase the number of outstanding shares. The issuance of any shares upon conversion of any preferred stock, including our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, under our equity compensation plans, for acquisition, licensing or financing efforts, upon conversion of any preferred stock or exercise of warrants and options, pursuant to our equity compensation plans, or otherwise may resultupon settlement of restricted stock units or in a reduction offinancings will dilute the book value and market price of the outstanding sharesinterests of our holders of common stock. If we issue any such additional shares, such issuance willstock and cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all then current stockholders.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock into the public market Any such issuances may also result in significant downward pressure on the price of our common stock and could affect your ability to realize the current trading price of our common stock.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could cause a reduction in the market price of our common stock. To

The interests of our controlling stockholders may not coincide with yours and such controlling stockholders may make decisions with which you may disagree.

As of February 3, 2021, five of our stockholders, two of whom are our Executive Chairman and our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Strategy Officer, and another of whom is a director, beneficially owned in the extent stockholders sellaggregate over 50% of the voting power of our outstanding shares of common stock and Series A Preferred Stock on an as-converted basis. As a result, these stockholders may be able to influence the outcome of matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. In addition, this concentration of ownership may delay or prevent a change in control of our company and make some future transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of our controlling stockholders. The interests of our controlling stockholders may not coincide with our interests or the interests of other stockholders.


If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price ofand trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock maywill depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We currently have new research coverage by securities and industry analysts. If one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, duewhich could cause our stock price and trading volume to the additional shares of common stock in the market.decline.

 

AnyWe are subject to financial reporting and other requirements that place significant downward pressuredemands on our resources.

We are subject to reporting and other obligations under the priceSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 requires us to conduct an annual management assessment of the effectiveness of our commoninternal control over financial reporting. These reporting and other obligations place significant demands on our management, administrative, operational, internal audit and accounting resources. Any failure to maintain effective internal controls, such as occurred as of December 31, 2019 and 2020, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price. Moreover, effective internal control is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, we may not be able to manage our business as stockholders sell their shareseffectively as we would if an effective control environment existed, and our business and reputation with investors may be harmed. We may also face claims by our investors, which could encourage short sales ofharm our common stock. Any such short sales could place further downward pressure on the price of our common stock.business and financial condition.

27

 

Risks Relating to Our Charter Documents and Capital Structure

We are close to being controlled by a small number of “insider” stockholders.stockholders, which could determine corporate and stockholder action on significant matters.

 

As of March 25, 2017,February 3, 2021, our directors and executive officers and other beneficial owners, beneficially own 123,565,645 common shares including warrants and options which is approximately 110.58%owned an aggregate of 4,114,782 of our outstanding 111,744,142shares of common shares. The holdingsstock and 60,000 shares of our directors, executive officersoutstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, which represents approximately 41% of the aggregate voting power of our outstanding shares of common stock and other affiliated owners represent 49.94%Series A Preferred Stock on a fully dilutedan as-converted basis. Accordingly, throughThrough their collective ownership of our outstanding common stock, such holders, if they were to act together, willwould be close to controlling the voting of our shares at all meetings of stockholders and, because the common stock does not have cumulative voting rights, will determineto determining the outcome of the election of all of our directors and determining corporate and stockholder action on other matters.

 

Provisions of our certificateCertificate of incorporationIncorporation and bylaws could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could deter or prevent a change in control.

 

Some provisions in our certificateCertificate of incorporationIncorporation and bylaws, as well as statutes, may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control. These provisions, including those providing for the possible issuance of shares of our preferred stock, which may be divided into series and with the preferences, limitations and relative rights to be determined by our board of directors, and the right of the board of directors to amend the bylaws, may make it more difficult for other persons, without the approval of our board of directors, to make a tender offer or otherwise acquire a substantial number of shares of our common stock or to launch other takeover attempts that a stockholder might consider to be in his or her best interest. These provisions could limit the price that some investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

Delaware law may delay or prevent takeover attempts by third parties and therefore inhibit our stockholders from realizing a premium on their stock.

 

We are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL. This section preventsLaw. These provisions prevent any stockholder who owns 15% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock from engaging in certain business combinations with us for a period of three years following the time that the stockholder acquired such stock ownership unless certain approvals were or are obtained from our board of directors or from the holders of 66 2/3% of our outstanding shares of common stock (excluding the shares of our common stock owned by the 15% or more stockholder). Our board of directors can use these and other provisions to discourage, delay or prevent a change in the control of our company or a change in our management. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction or a change in our board of directors or management could deter potential acquirers or prevent the completion of a transaction in which our stockholders could receive a substantial premium over the then current market price for theirof our shares. These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay for shares of our common stock.


Failure to manage growth effectively could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

The success of our future operating activities will depend upon our ability to expand our support system to meet the demands of our growing business. Any failure by our management to effectively anticipate, implement, and manage changes required to sustain our growth would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully operate acquired businesses (if any), become profitable in the future, or effectively manage any other change.

 

28

The elimination of the monetary liability againstof our directors officers and employees under Delaware law and the existence of indemnification rights toheld by our directors, officers and employees may result in substantial expenditures by us and may discourage lawsuits against our directors, officers and employees.

 

Our bylaws containCertificate of Incorporation contains specific provisions that eliminate the liability of our directors for monetary damages to our company and stockholders and permitrequires indemnification of our directors and officers to the extent provided by Delaware law. Our bylaws also contain provisions that require the indemnification of our directors, officers and employees. We may also have contractual indemnification obligations under our employment agreements with our officers. The foregoing limitation of liability and indemnification obligations could result in our company incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against directors and officers, which we may be unable to recoup. These provisions and resultant costs may also discourage our company from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by our stockholders against our directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit our company and our stockholders.

 

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

 

As a “smaller reporting company,” we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.Not applicable.

 

Item 2.    Properties

 

OurThe Company’s principal executive offices are located at 5210 E. Williams Circle, Suite 750, Tucson, Arizona 85711, consisting of approximately 2,3625,151 square feet as of Decemberunder a lease agreement that expires on October 31, 2016. The Company’s principal executive office is leased for an aggregate amount of $4,724 per month. We also have offices in Atlanta at 1855 Piedmont Road, Suite 200, Marietta, Georgia leased for an aggregate of $2,763 per month as of December 31, 2016. During 2015, offices located in New York were sublet, resulting in a savings of $21,135 per month. We closed the office in Washington D.C., saving $1,280 per month and the Principal Executive office was relocated and downsized with a monthly reduction in rent of $7,146. Beginning November 1, 2015, we subleased an office from a company controlled by our Executive Chairman in Scottsdale, AZ for $500 per month.2022.

 

The Company’s total rent expense was approximately $109,340Company also leases offices in Scottsdale, Arizona, and $314,485Atlanta, Georgia, and occupies shared office space in Portland, Oregon, and New York, New York, under office leasesmembership agreements which provide for membership fees based on the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.number of contracted seats.

 

We believe our current premises areThe Company believes that its space is adequate for ourits current operations although we may require additional premises inneeds and that suitable alternative space is available to accommodate expansion of the foreseeable future.Company’s operations.

 

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

 

In April 2015, two shareholder class action lawsuits were filed against the Company and former officers Nathaniel Bradley and Edward O’Donnell in the U.S. District Court for the Districtnormal course of Arizona. The plaintiffs allege various causes of action against the defendants arising from our announcement that our previously issued financial results for the first three quarters of 2014 and the guidance for the fourth quarter of 2014 and the full year of 2014 could no longer be relied upon. The complaints sought among other relief, compensatory damages and plaintiff’s counsel’s fees and experts’ fees. The Court appointed a lead plaintiff and lead counsel, and consolidated the actions. A consolidated amended complaint was filed under the captionIn re AudioEye, Inc. Sec. Litigation.The Company and individual defendants filed a motion to dismiss. 

On July 25, 2016, in connection with a voluntary mediation, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the consolidated actions. The settlement agreement isbusiness, we are subject to definitive documentation, shareholder notice,proceedings, lawsuits, regulatory agency inquiries, and court approval. The terms of the agreement include a settlement paymentother claims. All such matters are subject to the class of $1,525,000 from the Company’s insurer,uncertainties and outcomes that are not predictable with no admission of liability by any party. In 2015, the Company paid a deductible under its D&O insurance policy in the amount of $100,000 regarding this matter.

29

On January 23, 2017, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement pursuant to the terms set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement, provisionally certified a settlement class of shareholders, and directed plaintiffs' counsel to provide notice to that class. The Court will hold a Final Settlement Hearing May 8, 2017 to consider any objections to the Settlement that might be raised by settlement class members, to consider plaintiffs’ counsel's application for an award of fees and costs, and to finally determine whether the Order and Final Judgment as provided under the Stipulation of Settlement should be entered, dismissing the case with prejudice.

On May 16, 2016, a shareholder derivative complaint entitled LiPoChing, Derivatively and on Behalf of AudioEye, Inc., v. Bradley, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. As a derivative complaint, the plaintiff-shareholder purported to act on behalf of the Company against the Named Individuals. The Company was named as a nominal defendant. The complaint asserted causes of action including breach of fiduciary duty and others, arising from the Company’s restatement of its financial results for the first three quarters of 2014. The complaint sought, among other relief, compensatory damages, restitution and attorneys’ fees. In October 2016, the Company and Named Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. In response, the Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the complaint without prejudice.

On July 26, 2016, a shareholder derivative complaint entitled Denese M. Hebert, derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant AudioEye, Inc., v. Bradley, et al., was filed in the State of Arizona Superior Court for Pima County. The complaint generally asserts causes of action related to the Company’s restatement of its financial statements for the first three fiscal quarters of 2014. As a derivative complaint, the plaintiff-shareholder purports to act on behalf of the Company against the Named Individuals.

The Company is named as a nominal defendant. The Company understands that the Named Individuals intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in February 2017, which presently is scheduled to be heard in May 2017.assurance. While the Company believes that its legal defense costs may be reimbursed by the Company’s insurance carrier, no reasonable estimate of the outcome of the litigation, the related legal fees, or the impact on the financial results of the Company can be made as of the date of this statement.

We may become involved in various other routine disputes and allegations incidental to our business operations. While it is not possible to determine the ultimate disposition of these matters ourcould materially affect operating results when resolved in future periods, management believes that, after final disposition, including anticipated insurance recoveries in certain cases, any monetary liability or financial impact to the resolutionCompany beyond that provided for in the consolidated balance sheet as of any such matters, should they arise, isDecember 31, 2020, would not likelybe material to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or annual results of operations.

 

Item 4.     Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable.

 


PART II

 

Item 5.      Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Common Stock Information

 

Our common stock started beinghas been listed on the OTCQB and the OTC Bulletin Board effective April 15, 2013The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “AEYE.” Beginning on April 16, 2015, our common shares were quoted on the OTC Pink marketplace due to our inability to timely file certain documents with the SEC. We resumed trading on the OTCQB effective July 23, 2015. “AEYE” since September 4, 2018.

 

30

The following table sets forth the high and low sale pricesOn March 5, 2021, there were 187 holders of record of our common stock, on the OTC Bulletin Board/OTC Pink Marketplace for the periods indicated:

  High  Low 
Quarter ended March 31, 2015 $0.60  $0.40 
Quarter ended June 30, 2015 $0.40  $0.14 
Quarter ended September 30, 2015 $0.14  $0.04 
Quarter ended December 31, 2015 $0.06  $0.03 
Quarter ended March 31,2016 $0.20  $0.03 
Quarter ended June 30, 2016 $0.21  $0.13 
Quarter ended September 30, 2016 $0.18  $0.07 
Quarter ended December 31, 2016 $0.19  $0.07 

As of March 30, 2017, we had approximately 258 common stockholders and 12 preferred stockholders of record and a greater number of beneficial holders of our common stock for whom shares arewere held in a “nominee” or “street” name. As of that same date, there were seven holders of record of our preferred stock.

 

The transfer agent of our common stock is Equiniti Trust Company (f//a/ Corporate Stock Transfer,Transfer). Its address is 3200 Cherry Creek Drive, Suite 430, Denver, Colorado 80209, and its telephone number:number is (303) 282-4800.

Dividend Policy

 

In April 2015, the Company issued 175,000 shares of Series A preferred sharesConvertible Preferred Stock with cumulative 5% dividend rights payable when declared by the board of directors of the Company.

 

Dividends to preferred shareholdersstockholders take precedence over any dividends to common shareholders.stockholders. Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available.available therefor. We have not declared or paid any dividends toon our preferred or common stock since our inception, and we presently anticipate that all earnings, if any, will be retained for development of our business. There are no restrictions in our certificateCertificate of incorporationIncorporation or by-lawsBy-laws that prevent us from declaring dividends. Any future dispositiondeclaration of dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon, among other things, our future earnings, operating and financial condition, and capital requirements,requirements.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued an aggregate of 253,974 shares of its common stock upon exercise of previously issued warrants for net proceeds of $905,000 and other factors.43,504 shares of its common stock upon the conversion of previously issued preferred stock.  Such issuances were exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

Item 6.      Selected Financial Data

 

Disclosure in response to this item is not required of a smaller reporting company.Not applicable.

  

Item 7.      Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated audited financial statements and the related notes for the years ended December 31, 20162020 and 20152019 that appear elsewhere in this annual report.report on Form 10-K. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include but are not limited to those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K, particularly in the section entitled “Risk Factors.” The forward-looking statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K are made only as of the date hereof.

 

31

Background

 

AudioEye, Inc. was formed as a Delaware corporation on May 20, 2005. On March 31, 2010, CMG Holdings Group, Inc. (“CMGO”) acquired our company. In connection withAugust 1, 2018, the acquisition,Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split in the former stockholdersratio of our company retained rights to receive cash from the exploitation of our technology (the “Rights”) consisting of 50% of any cash received from income earned, settlements or judgments directly resulting from our patent strategy and a1 share of our net income for 2010, 2011 and 2012 from the exploitation of our technology. The Rights were then contributed to a newly formed Nevada corporation, AudioEye Acquisition Corporation (“AEAC”) in exchange forevery 25 shares of AEAC. Duringcommon stock and to reduce the period asnumber of authorized shares of common stock from 250,000,000 to 50,000,000. As a wholly-owned subsidiary of CMGO, we continued to expand our patent portfolio to protect our proprietary Internet content publication and distribution technology.

On June 22, 2011, CMGO entered into a Master Agreement with AEAC pursuant to which: (i) the stockholders of AEAC would acquire from the CMGO 80% of our capital stock (the “Separation”) and (ii) CMGO would distribute to its stockholders, in the form of a dividend, 5% of our capital stock (the “Spin-off”). Pursuant to the Master Agreement, AEAC was required to arrange for the release of senior secured notes (the “Senior Notes”) issued by CMGO in an aggregate principal amount of $1,025,000, which CMGO had been unable to service. On August 17, 2012, we, CMGO and AEAC completed the Separation. In connection with the Separation, AEAC arranged for the release of CMGO under the Senior Notes by payment to the holders thereof of $700,000, the delivery of a secured promissory note in the principal amount of $425,000 and the issuance of 1,500,000result, 186,994,384 shares of the Company’s common stock of AEAC. On February 6, 2013, the note was paid in full. On January 29, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective our registration statement on Form S-1 with respect to 1,500,259were exchanged for 7,479,775 shares of ourthe Company's common stock to be issued in the Spin-off. On February 22, 2013, CMGO completed the Spin-off.stock.

 

In connection with the Separation, we entered into a Royalty Agreement with CMGO. Pursuant to the Royalty Agreement, for a period of five years, we would pay to CMGO 10% of cash received from income earned or settlements on judgments directly resulting from our patent enforcement and licensing strategy, whether received by us on any of our affiliates, net in either case of any direct costs or tax implications incurred in pursuit of such strategy as they relate to the patents described in the Master Agreement. Additionally, we entered into a Services Agreement with CMGO whereby, without duplication to the amounts payable under the Royalty Agreement, for a period of 5 years, CMGO will receive a commission of 7.5% of all revenues received by us after the Separation from all business, clients or other sources of revenue procured by CMGO or its employees, officers or subsidiaries and directed to us and 10% of net revenues obtained from a specified customer.

On March 22, 2013, we and AEAC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which AEAC would be merged with and into our company (the “Merger”) with our company being the surviving entity. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each share of AEAC common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Merger effective date would be converted into .94134 share of our common stock and the outstanding convertible debentures of AEAC (the “AEAC Debentures”) in the aggregate principal amount of $1,400,200, together with accrued interest thereon, would be assumed by us and then exchanged for convertible debentures of our company (the “AE Debentures”).

Effective March 25, 2013, the Merger was completed. In connection with the Merger, the stockholders of AEAC received on a pro rata basis the 24,004,143 shares of our common stock that were held by AEAC, and the former holders of the AEAC Debentures received an aggregate of 5,871,752 shares of our common stock pursuant to their conversion of all of the AE Debentures issued to replace the AEAC Debentures. The principal assets of AEAC were the Rights that had been contributed to AEAC by the former stockholders of our company.  As a result of the Merger, the Rights have been extinguished.

On November 12, 2013, we and CMGO terminated the Royalty Agreement.

On December 30, 2013, we completed the repurchase of 2,184,583 shares of our common stock owned by CMGO which shares were transferred to us in January, 2014 and retired to treasury. In connection, with the repurchase, we paid CMGO $573,022 and forgave a $50,000 payable from an affiliate of CMGO.

32

Overview

 

AudioEye is a marketplace leader providing weban industry-leading software solution provider delivering website accessibility compliance at all price points to businesses of all sizes. Our solutions for our clients’ customers through ourAlly Platformproducts. Our technology advancesadvance accessibility with patented technology solutions that reducereduces barriers, expandexpands access for individuals with disabilities, and enhanceenhances the user experience for many users.When implemented, wea broader audience. We believe that, when implemented, our solutions offersolution offers businesses and organizations the opportunity to reach more customers, improve brand image, and build additional brand loyalty. In addition, our solutions help organizations complyloyalty, and, most importantly, provide an accessible and usable web experience to the expansive and ever-growing global population of individuals with internationally accepted Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) as well as US, Canadian, Australian, and United Kingdom accessibility laws.disabilities.

 

We generate revenuesAudioEye primarily generates revenue through the sale of subscriptions for our software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) accessibility solutions. Our solutions are backed by AudioEye’s machine-learning/AI-driven technology that finds and fixes the most common accessibility errors. Our core and supplemental solutions are designed to help websites and applications achieve and sustain substantial conformance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (“WCAG”) which are web accessibility standards published by the Web Accessibility Initiative of our SaaS technology platform, calledthe World Wide Web Consortium, the main international standards organization for the internet. Our solutions help mitigate a customer’s risk of costly digital accessibility-related legal action and improve their negotiation leverage when defending against claims of non-compliance. AudioEye customers may purchase solutions directly through the AudioEye Ally Platform, to website, owners, publishers, developers, and operators and through the delivery of managed services combineda platform or an agency partner, such as Duda, that integrates our solutions into their marketplace, through a vertical Content Management System (“CMS”) partner or through an authorized reseller, or by working directly with the implementationAudioEye sales team. We also provide PDF remediation and Mobile App report services. Our offerings serve businesses and organizations of all sizes and at all price points.

AudioEye stands out among its competitors because it delivers machine-learning/artificial intelligence (“AI”)-driven accessibility without fundamental changes to the website architecture. As another differentiator, we offer greater transparency. Our offerings provide automated remediations and a transparent compliance score with additional manually driven enhancements. AudioEye solution.pairs its patented technology solutions with certified accessibility experts, which allows our customers to achieve a higher level of compliance than competitors relying solely on the reach of automation. Our solutions have been adoptedtechnology publishes more than one billion remediations daily, and our solution is trusted by some of the largest and most influential companies in the world. Our customers span disparate industriesworld, including ADP, Tommy Hilfiger, 360 Media, Samsung, Darden, Landry's and target market verticals, which encompass (but are not limited to)more. Government agencies, from the following categories: human resources, finance, transportation, media, and education. Government agenciesfederal level down to the local level, have also integrated our software in their digital platforms.platforms, including the Federal Communications Commission and the Social Security Administration.

 

We manage customers through two primary channels, Enterprise and Partner and Marketplace. Enterprise channel consists of our larger customers and organizations, including those with non-platform custom websites, who generally engage directly with AudioEye sales personnel for custom pricing and solutions. This channel also includes federal, state and local government agencies. The Partner and Marketplace channel consists of our CMS partners, platform & agency partners, authorized resellers and the Marketplace. This channel serves small and medium sized businesses that are on a partner or reseller’s web-hosting platform or that purchase an AudioEye solution from our Marketplace. We saw strong growth in both our Enterprise and Partner and Marketplace channels in 2020, with revenue growth in each channel of 48% and 177%, respectively, in 2020 compared to 2019. Our Partner and Marketplace revenue growth was due to a significant number of additional customer implementations that each Partner offers, and represented about 57% of Monthly Recurring Revenue (“MRR”) contribution at the end of 2020. We define MRR as the sum of (i) for our Enterprise channel, the total of the average monthly recurring fee amount under each active paid contract at the date of determination, plus (ii) for our Partner and Marketplace channel, the recognized recurring monthly fee amount for all paying customers at the date of determination, in each case, assuming no changes to the subscription and without taking into account any usage above the subscription or recurring revenue base, if any, that may be applicable to such subscription. This determination includes both annual and monthly contracts for recurring products. Some of our contracts are cancelable, which may impact future MRR. MRR excludes revenue from our PDF remediation services and Mobile App report business. As of December 31, 2020, MRR was approximately $1.9 million, which represented an increase of 54% year-over-year.


Results of Operations

 

Our consolidated audited financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP” or “GAAP”). The discussion of the results of our operations compares the year ended December 31, 2020 with the year ended December 31, 2019. Our results of operations in these periods are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for any subsequent period. Due to rounding, numbers presented throughout this document may not add up precisely to the totals provided and percentages may not precisely reflect the absolute figures.

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Results of Operations      
Revenues  994,265   338,863 
Cost of sales  1,226,321   1,224,652 
Gross loss  (232,056)  (885,789)
         
Selling and marketing expenses  713,972   884,440 
Research and development expenses  343,712   375,817 
General and administrative expenses  2,568,227   4,633,702 
Impairment of non-marketable securities  50,000   - 
Amortization and depreciation  570,247   534,220 
Operating (loss)  (4,478,214)  (7,313,968)
Other Income (Expense)  750   3,814 
Realized gain (loss) on marketable securities  -   - 
Unrealized loss on investments  (2,400)  (10,200)
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative liabilities  (2,758,488)  187,932 
Loss on settlement of debt  (1,664,281)  - 
Interest expense  (675,997)  (76,723)
Net (loss) $(9,578,630) $(7,209,145)
Deemed dividend on Series A Convertible preferred stock  -   (594,641)
Dividend on Series A Convertible preferred stock  (80,000)  (58,733)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(9,658,630) $(7,862,519)
Net (loss) per weighted average common $(0.10) $(0.10)

 

In 2016,2020, the Company amended the categorization of certain expenses to conform to changes incurred in its operations, including internal department structure changes, employee movements, intellectual property and technology related expenses, and facility expenses. For the purposes of comparability, the company reclassified prior period results to conform with our net loss increased to $(9,658,630) from $(7,862,519) in 2015, primarily as a result of the following: current period presentation.

 

33
  

Year ended

December 31,

  

Favorable / (Unfavorable)

Change

 
(in thousands) 2020  2019  $  % 
Revenue $20,475  $10,765  $9,710   90%
Cost of revenue  5,961   4,406   1,555   35%
Gross profit  14,514   6,359   8,155   128%
Operating expenses:                
Selling and marketing  8,472   5,708   (2,764)  (48)%
Research and development  1,230   636   (594)  (93)%
General and administrative  11,945   7,833   (4,112)  (52)%
Total operating expenses  21,647   14,177   (7,470)  (53)%
Operating loss  (7,133)  (7,818)  685   9%
Other income (expense):                
Change in fair value of warrant liability  120   99   21   21%
Interest expense  (145)  (76)  (69)  (91)%
Other income (expense)  -   12   (12)  (100)%
Total other income (expense)  (25)  35   (60)  (171)%
Net loss $(7,158) $(7,783) $625   8%

 


Revenue

 

The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by sales channel:

  Year ended December 31,  Favorable / (Unfavorable) Change 
(in thousands) 2020  2019  $  % 
Enterprise $10,735  $7,252  $3,483  48%
Partner and Marketplace  9,740   3,513   6,227  177%
Total revenues $20,475  $10,765  $9,710  90%

Enterprise channel consists of our larger customers and organizations, including those with non-platform custom websites, who generally engage directly with AudioEye sales personnel for custom pricing and solutions. This channel also includes federal, state and local government agencies.

Partner and Marketplace channel consists of our CMS partners, platform & agency partners, authorized resellers and the Marketplace. This channel serves small & medium sized businesses that are on a partner or reseller’s web-hosting platform or that purchase an AudioEye solution from our Marketplace.

For the yearsyear ended December 31, 20162020, total revenue increased by 90%, over the prior year. We experienced revenue growth in both of our sales channels. The increase in Enterprise channel revenue was driven by growth in our managed solutions and 2015,the benefit from increased contribution by our PDF remediation services and Mobile App report business. The increase in Partner and Marketplace channel revenue in the amountwas a result of $994,265 and $338,863, respectively, consisted primarily of various levels of core product sales, software development, website design and maintenance. Revenues increased dueour continued focus on highly transactional industry verticals to a change of marketing focus.achieve higher penetration within our existing partnerships. 

 

Cost of SalesRevenue and Gross Profit

  Year ended December 31,  Favorable / (Unfavorable) Change 
(in thousands) 2020  2019  $  % 
Revenue $20,475  $10,765  $9,710  90%
Cost of sales  5,961   4,406   (1,555) (35)%
Gross profit $14,514  $6,359  $8,155  128%

Cost of revenue consists primarily of compensation and related benefits costs for our customer experience team, as well as a portion of our technology operations team that supports the delivery of our services, fees paid to our managed hosting and other third-party service providers, amortization of capitalized software development costs and patent costs, and allocated overhead costs.

 

For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,2020, cost of sales increased by 35% over the prior year. The increase in the amountcost of $1,226,321sales was primarily due to additions to our employee and $1,224,652, respectively, consisted primarily of sub-contractingcontractor headcount to outside sources, direct labor and direct technology costs.

Gross Loss

Thesupport the increase in revenue and delivery of our services, as well as an increase in sub-contracting and direct labor cost resulted in a gross profit/(loss)amortization of $(232,056) and $(885,789) forcapitalized software development costs.

For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Gross loss decreased as2020, gross profit increased by 128% over the prior year. The increase in gross profit was a result of increasing sales net with an increaseincreased revenue and continued improvement in sub-contracting and direct labor costs.technology driven efficiencies as we scale, offset in part by higher costs to support the revenue growth.

 

Selling and Marketing Expenses

  Year ended December 31,  Favorable / (Unfavorable) Change 
(in thousands) 2020  2019�� $  % 
Selling and marketing $8,472  $5,708  $(2,764)  (48)%

 

Selling and marketing expenses were $713,972consist primarily of compensation and $884,440 forbenefits related to our sales and marketing staff, as well as third-party advertising and marketing expenses.

For the yearsyear ended December 31, 20162020, selling and 2015, respectively.marketing expenses increased by 48% over the prior year. The decreaseincrease in selling and marketing expenses resultsresulted primarily from staffan increase in personnel costs driven by focused talent acquisition, higher commission costs, higher digital and salary reductionthird-party marketing agency expenses, and higher media spend as well as the elimination of outside selling contractors.we continued to expand our business.


 

Research and Development Expenses

  Year ended December 31,  Favorable / (Unfavorable) Change 
(in thousands) 2020  2019  $  % 
Research and development expense $1,230  $636  $(594)  (93)%
Plus: Capitalized research and development cost  1,157   307   (850)  (277)%
Total research and development cost $2,387   943  $(1,444)  (153)%

 

Research and development (“R&D”) expenses wereconsist primarily of compensation and $343,712related benefits, independent contractor costs, and $375,817 foran allocated portion of general overhead costs, including occupancy costs related to our employees involved in research and development activities. Total research and development cost includes the yearsamount of research and development expense reported within operating expenses as well as development cost that was capitalized during the fiscal period.

For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Research2020, research and development expenses decreased predominantlyincreased by 93% over the prior year. This was driven by increased investment in Machine Learning and non-capitalizable R&D efforts related to our new product and platform development as a result of a decreasewe test and learn new capabilities. For the year ended December 31, 2020, capitalized research and development cost increased 277% over the prior year, driven by increased investment in our platforms and products as we continue to improve our technology staff.and product delivery to help our customers and gain efficiencies as we scale. Total research and development cost, which includes both R&D expenses and capitalized R&D costs, increased 153% from 2019 to 2020.

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

  Year ended December 31,  Favorable / (Unfavorable)Change 
(in thousands) 2020  2019  $  % 
General and administrative $11,945  $7,833  $(4,112)  (52)%

General and administrative expenses were $2,568,227consist primarily of compensation and $4,633,702 forbenefits related to our executives, corporate support functions and administrative staff, general corporate expenses including legal fees, and occupancy costs.

For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. General2020, general and administrative expenses decreased as a resultincreased by 52% over the prior year. The increase in general and administrative expenses was due primarily to higher compensation costs, including stock-based compensation expense, driven by increased executive headcount to support the Company’s growth, systems infrastructure improvement and legal expenses towards corporate governance, litigation and intellectual property defense. In addition, in the third quarter of reduced headcount, reduction2020, we incurred $360,000 in contract labor costs, benefit reductions, as well as decrease in stock based compensation year over year.

Impairment of non-marketable securities

In 2016, we impaired non-marketable securitiesseverance expense associated with a carrying value of $50,000.our strategic decision to move our technology center from Atlanta, Georgia, to Portland, Oregon.

 

Amortization and Depreciation

Amortization and depreciation expenses were $570,247 and $534,220 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase in expense was primarily related to an increase in intellectual property amortization and intangibles.

Gain (loss) on changeChange in Fair Value of Derivative LiabilitiesWarrant Liability

 

  Year ended
December 31,
  Favorable / (Unfavorable)Change 
(in thousands) 2020  2019  $  % 
Change in fair value of warrant liability $120  $99  $21   21%

In October 2015 and in 2016, we issued warrants with embedded reset provisions. We value these derivatives each reporting period and record any change in fair market value as non-cash gains or losses. This resulted in a loss of $(2,758,488) on change

Change in fair value of derivative liabilitieswarrant liability consists of fair value adjustments associated with warrants to purchase 146,667 shares of the Company’s common stock, which were issued in consideration for the credit facility extended by Sero Capital in the third quarter of 2019. In the third quarter of 2020, the warrants were fully exercised and the related liability was extinguished, which led to a $120,000 gain being recognized for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to a gain of $187,932 for 2015.

34

Loss on settlement of Debt

In April 2016, we issued common stock warrants in settlement of convertible debt and accrued interest. As such, we incurred a non-cash loss on debt settlement between the estimated fair value of the issued warrants and the carrying value of the debt and accrued interest of $1,664,281.2020.

 

Interest Expense net

 

  Year ended
December 31,
  Favorable / (Unfavorable) Change 
(in thousands) 2020  2019  $  % 
Interest expense $145  $76  $(69)  (91)%

Interest expense, net during the year ended December 31, 2016 was $675,997 compared to $76,723 for the year ended December 31, 2015. For 2016 and 2015, interest expense consists primarily of amortization of debt discountsissuance costs from our line of credit, and interest incurred relatingon our PPP Loan and finance lease liabilities. The increase in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 was attributable to the amortization of deferred issuance costs associated with our issued notes payable.line of credit, which was not drawn upon through its one-year term which expired in August 2020.


Other Key Operating Metrics

 

Contracts in Process/Revenue RecognitionWe consider monthly recurring revenue (“MRR”) as a key operating metric and a key indicator of our overall business. We also use MRR as (i) one of the primary methods for planning and forecasting overall expectations and for evaluating, on at least a quarterly and annual basis, actual results against such expectations; and (ii) as a performance metric for certain executive stock-based compensation awards.

 

Under current accounting procedures,We define MRR as the Company only recognizessum of (i) for our Enterprise channel, the total of the average monthly recurring fee amount under each active paid contract at the date of determination, plus (ii) for our Partner and Marketplace channel, the recognized monthly fee amount for all paying customers at the date of determination, in each case, assuming no changes to the subscription and without taking into account any usage above the subscription or recurring revenue on newbase, if any, that may be applicable to such subscription. This determination includes both annual and monthly contracts for the actual services delivered in the period under the following criteria: (i) the contract has been signed and delivered to the Company; (ii) the services have been performed or delivered; and (iii) the client has been billed for the services delivered. The Company does not record deferred revenues for new contracts until the first payment for services has been received. The Company only records accounts receivable for the amount of revenue recognized as service is rendered, even if the client has been billed for the entire contract value. The table below summarizes the amount of contract value in excess of the revenue recognized of $1,044,362 and the deferred revenue recognized of $386,485, in the amount of $657,525. The Company also receives contracts for service hours but whose total contract value is uncertain. These “fee for service contracts” are recorded in the table below only if the services have been delivered and the associated revenue has been recognized.

A summaryrecurring products. Some of our contracts in process is as follows:are cancelable, which may impact future MRR. MRR excludes revenue from our PDF remediation services business and Mobile App report business. As of December 31, 2020, MRR was about $1.9 million, which represents an increase of 54% year-over-year driven primarily by our Partner and Marketplace channel.

 

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

  Contracts in Process 
  December 31, 2016 
     Revenue  Revenue
Recognized
  Deferred  Contract Amount in
Excess of Deferred
 
  Contract  Recognized  12 Months Ended  Revenue  Revenue and 
  Amount  prior to 2016  December 31, 2016  December 31, 2016  Recognized Revenue 
Fixed Contracts $2,088,372  $50,097  $994,265  $386,485  $657,525 

From time to time, we review adjusted financial measures that assist us in comparing our operating performance consistently over time, as such measures remove the impact of certain items, as applicable, such as our capital structure (primarily interest charges), items outside the control of the management team (taxes), and expenses that do not relate to our core operations, including transaction-related expenses and other costs that are expected to be non-recurring, such as severance related to strategic shift. In order to provide investors with greater insight, and allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the information used in our financial and operational decision-making, the Company has supplemented the Financial Statements presented on a GAAP basis in this Annual Report on Form 10-K with the following non-GAAP financial measures: Non-GAAP earnings (loss) and Non-GAAP earnings (loss) per diluted share.

These non-GAAP financial measures have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of Company results as reported under GAAP. The Company compensates for such limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using non-GAAP financial measures only as supplemental data. We also provide a reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP measures used. Investors are encouraged to carefully review this reconciliation. In addition, because these non-GAAP measures are not measures of financial performance under GAAP and are susceptible to varying calculations, these measures, as defined by us, may differ from and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

Non-GAAP Earnings (Loss) and Non-GAAP Earnings (Loss) per Diluted Share

We define: (i) Non-GAAP earnings (loss) as net income (loss), less non-cash valuation adjustments to liabilities, plus interest expense, plus stock-based compensation expense and plus certain severance expense; and (ii) Non-GAAP earnings (loss) per diluted share as net income (loss) per diluted common share, less non-cash valuation adjustments to liabilities, plus interest expense, plus stock-based compensation expense and plus certain severance expense, each on a per share basis. Non-GAAP earnings per diluted share would include incremental shares in the share count that are considered anti-dilutive in a GAAP net loss position. However, no incremental shares apply when there is a Non-GAAP loss per diluted share, as is the case for the periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Non-GAAP earnings (loss) and Non-GAAP earnings (loss) per diluted share are used to facilitate a comparison of our operating performance on a consistent basis from period to period and provide for a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business than GAAP measures alone. All of the items adjusted in the Non-GAAP earnings (loss) to net loss and the related per share calculations are either recurring non-cash items, or items that management does not consider in assessing our on-going operating performance. In the case of the non-cash items, such as stock-based compensation expense and valuation adjustments to assets and liabilities, management believes that investors may find it useful to assess our comparative operating performance because the measures without such items are expected to be less susceptible to variances in actual performance resulting from expenses that do not relate to our core operations and are more reflective of other factors that affect operating performance. In the case of items that do not relate to our core operations, management believes that investors may find it useful to assess our operating performance if the measures are presented without these items because their financial impact does not reflect ongoing operating performance.

Non-GAAP earnings (loss) is not a measure of liquidity under GAAP, or otherwise, and is not an alternative to cash flow from continuing operating activities, despite the advantages regarding the use and analysis of these measures as mentioned above. Non-GAAP earnings (loss) and Non-GAAP earnings (loss) per diluted share, as disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider these measures in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP; nor are these measures intended to be measures of liquidity or free cash flow for our discretionary use.


To properly and prudently evaluate our business, we encourage readers to review the GAAP financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business. The following table sets forth reconciliations of Non-GAAP loss to net loss, the most directly comparable GAAP-based measure, as well as Non-GAAP loss per diluted share to net loss per diluted share, the most directly comparable GAAP-based measure.

  Year ended December 31, 
(in thousands, except per share data) 2020  2019 
Non-GAAP Earnings (Loss) Reconciliation        
Net loss (GAAP) $(7,158) $(7,783)
Non-cash valuation adjustments to liabilities  (120)  (99)
Interest expense  145   76 
Stock-based compensation expense  4,138   1,216 
Severance expense (1)  360   - 
Non-GAAP loss $(2,635) $(6,590)
         
Non-GAAP Earnings (Loss) per Diluted Share Reconciliation        
Net loss per common share (GAAP) — diluted $(0.77) $(0.97)
Non-cash valuation adjustments to liabilities  (0.01)  (0.01)
Interest expense  0.02   0.01 
Stock-based compensation expense  0.44   0.16 
Severance expense (1)  0.04   - 
Non-GAAP loss per diluted share (2) $(0.28) $(0.81)
Diluted weighted average shares (3)  9,313   8,107 

(1)Represents severance expense associated with the move of our technology center to Portland, Oregon, and is exclusive of accrued vacation paid upon termination of employment. 
(2)Non-GAAP earnings per adjusted diluted share for our common stock is computed using the more dilutive of the two-class method or the if-converted method.

(3)The number of diluted weighted average shares used for this calculation is the same as the weighted average common shares outstanding share count when the Company reports a GAAP and non-GAAP net loss.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Working Capital

 

Our auditors, Malone Bailey LLP, have indicated in their report on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year endedAs of December 31, 20162020, we had $9.1 million in cash and working capital of $5.6 million. The increase in working capital in 2020 was primarily a result of a public offering whereby the Company raised net proceeds of $7.8 million by issuing 473,239 shares of its common stock, as well as $880,000 received from a cash exercise of warrants by Sero Capital. We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for working capital and general corporate purposes.

In addition, on February 11, 2021, we entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with B. Riley Securities, Inc. (“Agent”) under which the Company may offer and sell, from time to time at its sole discretion, shares of its common stock to or through the Agent as its sales agent, having an aggregate offering price of up to $30 million. As of March 8, 2021, we had sold a total of 378,108 shares of common stock under this Sales Agreement for total proceeds of approximately $14.1 million, net of estimated transaction costs.

These capital raises contributed to the improvement in our cash and working capital positions, and we believe that conditions exist that raise substantial doubt about our ability the Company has sufficient liquidity to continue as a going concern due to our recurring losses from operations. A “going concern” opinion could impair our ability to finance our operations through the sale of equity, incurring debt, or other financing alternatives.

35

next twelve months.

 

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had cash of $1,409,418 and working capital deficit of $2,692,090, principally due to the non-cash derivative liability recorded in current liabilities. Excluding the derivative liability, the Company’s working capital would have been $786,536. In addition, the Company used actual net cash in operations of $2,340,281 during the year ended December 31, 2016. Even with a greater focus on cash revenue generation and the ongoing cost reductions, the conditions described in the first paragraph, above, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. While the Company has been successful in raising capital, in the past, there is no assurance that it will be successful at raising additional capital in the future. Additionally, if the Company’s plans are not achieved and/or if significant unanticipated events occur, the Company may have to further modify its business plan.plan, which may require us to raise additional capital or reduce expenses.

 

  At December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Current Assets $1,474,823  $1,804,986 
Current Liabilities  4,166,913   891,245 
Working Capital (Deficit) $(2,692,090) $913,741 
  At December 31, 
 (in thousands) 2020  2019 
Current assets $14,631  $5,608 
Current liabilities  (9,015)  (6,726)
Working capital (deficit) $5,616  $(1,118)


Cash Flows

  Year ended December 31, 
(in thousands) 2020  2019 
Net cash used in operating activities $(1,906) $(5,617)
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,298)  (363)
Net cash provided by financing activities  10,327   2,210 
Net increase (decrease) in cash $7,123  $(3,770)

 

For the year ended December 31, 2020, in relation to the prior year, cash used in operating activities decreased primarily due to an increase in our paying customer base leading to our revenue growth. The effect of higher collections from this expanded customer base was partially offset by the increased personnel and sales and marketing costs, primarily driven by the increase in headcount and related expenses and higher consulting and third-party costs to support the Company’s growth. In addition, the Company paid $360,000 in severance, as well as $66,000 in accrued vacation, associated with the relocation of our technology center to Portland, Oregon, as part of our strategic plan to build scalable technology to improve efficiency.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, in relation to the prior year, cash used in investing activities increased primarily due to investment in new technologies for enhancements to our legacy solutions, product development, as well as patents costs to protect our intellectual property and solidify our portfolio.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, in relation to the prior year, cash provided by financing activities increased primarily due to net proceeds of $7.8 million that we received from a public offering in the third quarter of 2020, whereby we issued 473,239 shares of our common stock. We intend to use the proceeds from this offering for working capital (deficit) forand general corporate purposes, including the implementation of our business plan and growth of current operations. In addition, in the second quarter of 2020, we obtained a $1.3 million PPP Loan. The increase in cash from financing activities due to the capital raise and PPP Loan was partially offset by a $1 million reduction in proceeds from the exercise of options and warrants, which totaled $1.3 million and $2.3 million in the years ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015 was $(2,692,090) and $913,741,2019, respectively. The change in working capital was primarily due to the non-cash derivative liability recorded in current liabilities.

Cash Flows

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Net Cash (Used in) Operating Activities $(2,340,281) $(5,474,454)
Net Cash (Used in) Investing Activities $(42,640) $(277,131)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities $2,105,082  $5,765,941 
(Decrease) (Increase) in Cash $(277,839) $14,356 

We had cash in the amount of $ 1,409,418 and $1,687,257 as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

On January 15, 2015, the Company sold an additional 812,500 units under a private placement that had its initial close in December 2014 (the “December 2014 Private Placement”) to one institutional investor for gross proceeds of $325,000 with no commission payable. Each unit in the December 2014 Private Placement consisted of one share of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase 0.375 share for every common share purchased. The warrants have a term of five years and an exercise price of $0.60 per share.

On March 5, 2015, Paul Arena resigned as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Executive Chairman and was designated by AIM Group, Inc. as a consultant to the Company for the term of one year. On March 5, 2015, the Company and Mr. Arena, pursuant to a Separation and Release Agreement, agreed to the issuance of 500,000 restricted common shares in lieu of the January 27, 2014 issuance of 3,000,000 Performance Share Units. The agreement calls for the immediate release of 250,000 common shares, or 50%, and up to 250,000 common shares, or 50%, be held in escrow until April 1, 2016 or until the Company’s 2015 audited financials are final. The 250,000 shares earned during the three months ended March 31, 2015 were valued and expensed at $117,500 in 2015.

36

Commencing on May 1, 2015, the Company sold an aggregate of 175,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”) to 12 accredited investors at a purchase price of $10.00 per share (the “Purchase Price”) for proceeds of $1,750,000 in a private placement. Each share of the Preferred Stock may be converted into shares of common stock of the Company by dividing the Purchase Price plus any accumulated dividends with respect to such share by an initial conversion price of $0.1754 (subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends and similar actions). The Company may redeem the Preferred Stock at any time for an amount equal to $12.50 plus accumulated dividends. The Preferred Stock will bear a dividend of 5% of the purchase price when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors of the Company. The Company evaluated the convertible preferred stock under FASB ASC 470-20-30 and determined it contained a beneficial conversion feature. The intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature was determined to be $594,641. The beneficial conversion feature was fully amortized and recorded as a deemed dividend.

From January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, the Company also issued 109,855 shares of common stock pursuant to exercise of warrants for total proceeds of $43,942. The Company also issued 2,851,936 additional shares of common stock for services provided for a total expense of $564,626 (in addition to the 250,000 common shares issued to Mr. Arena described above which were valued and expensed at $117,500).

On October 9, 2015 (the “October 2015 Closing Date”), we entered into a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement with certain investors (the “Investors”) for the issuance and sale of convertible promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of up to $3,750,000 (the “Notes”) and warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase up to an aggregate of 37,500,000 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Common Stock”). Notes representing up to $2,500,000 in aggregate principal, and Warrants exercisable for up to 25,000,000 shares of Common Stock in the aggregate, may be issued and sold at one or more closings during the 30-day period immediately following the October 2015 Closing Date. The maximum of $2,500,000 in aggregate principal was sold as of November 8, 2015. In addition, upon the election of any Investor within the three-year period immediately following the October 2015 Closing Date, any Investor may purchase an additional Note in the principal amount equal to 50% of the principal amount of the Notes purchased by such Investor at previous closings (the “Option Principal Amount”) and an additional Warrant with an aggregate exercise price equal to such Investor’s Option Principal Amount. The Notes mature three years from the date of issuance (the “Maturity Date”) and, until the Notes are repaid or converted into shares of the Company’s equity securities (“Equity Securities”), accrue payable-in-kind interest at the rate of 10% per annum.

The fair value of the warrants issued in connection with the notes was determined to be $627,293 (see Note 8) and was recognized as a discount to the debt being amortized to interest expense over the life of the loans. During 2015, aggregate amortization of $26,992 was recognized against the discount.

If the Company sells Equity Securities in a single transaction or series of related transactions for cash of at least $2,000,000 (excluding the conversion of the Notes and excluding the shares of Common Stock to be issued upon exercise of the Warrants) on or before the Maturity Date (the “Equity Financing”), all of the unpaid principal on the Notes plus accrued interest shall be automatically converted at the closing of the Equity Financing into a number of shares of the same class or series of Equity Securities as are issued and sold by the Company in such Equity Financing (or a class or series of Equity Securities identical in all respects to and ranking pari passu with the class or series of Equity Securities issued and sold in such Equity Financing) as is determined by dividing (i) the principal and accrued and unpaid interest amount of the Notes by (ii) 60% of the price per share at which such Equity Securities are issued and sold in such Equity Financing. The Notes, if not converted, shall be due and payable in full on the Maturity Date. The Notes contain customary events of default provisions. In connection with the issuance of the Notes, on October 9, 2015, the Company entered into a Security Agreement with the Investors (the “Security Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company granted a security interest in all of its assets to the Investors as collateral for the Company’s obligations under the Notes. The Warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share and expire 60 months following the date of issuance. The Warrants are subject to anti-dilution protection, subject to certain customary exceptions.

37

On April 18, 2016 (the “April 2016 Closing Date”), the Company entered into a Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement with certain investors for the issuance and sale of 11,714,285 shares of common stock of the Company and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,312,000 shares of Common Stock, representing up to $1,640,000 of proceeds, in one or more closings within 30 days of the April 2016 Closing Date. The warrants are exercisable at $0.25 per share for five years from the date of issuance and subject to anti-dilution protection as defined. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had received proceeds, net of costs, of $1,579,082.

In December 2016, the Company entered into a Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement with certain investors for the issuance and sale of 3,928,573 shares of common stock of the Company and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 440,000 shares of Common Stock, representing $550,000 of proceeds, in one or more closings. The warrants are exercisable at $0.25 per share for five years from the date of issuance and subject to anti-dilution protection as defined.

We may raise additional capital through the sale of equity or debt securities or borrowings from financial institutions or third parties or a combination of the foregoing. Capital raised will be used to implement our business plan, grow current operations, make acquisitions or start new vertical businesses among some of the possible uses.

Contractual Obligations

Operating leases

Our principal executive offices are located at 5210 E. Williams Circle, Suite 750, Tucson, Arizona 85711, consisting of approximately 2,362 square feet as of December 31, 2016. The Company’s principal executive office is leased for an aggregate amount of $4,724 per month through September 1, 2016 and an aggregate amount of $5,474 per month as of December 31, 2016. We also have offices in Atlanta, previously located at 1855 Piedmont Road, Suite 200, Marietta, Georgia leased for an aggregate of $2,763 per month. Beginning September 1, 2016, we re-located offices located at 3901 Roswell Road, Suite 134, leased for an aggregate of $3,937 per month as of December 31,2016. During 2015, offices located in New York were sublet, resulting in a savings of $21,135 per month. Both the lease and sublease in New York have expired, as of December 31, 2016. We closed the office in Washington D.C., saving $1,280 per month and the Principal Executive office was relocated and downsized with a monthly reduction in rent of $7,146. Beginning November 1, 2015, we subleased an office from a company controlled by our Executive Chairman in Scottsdale, AZ for $500 per month.

The Company’s total rent expense was approximately $109,340 and $314,485 under office leases for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for all non-cancelable operating leases for each of the next three years ending December 31 and thereafter:

Year ended December 31,    
2017 $111,603 
2018  105,168 
2019  37,719 
Total $254,490 

Employment contracts

Our objective is to align the compensation of our senior executives with long term value creation for our stockholders. As such, we use certain performance goals to determine the number of shares that they are eligible to receive each year.

38

Dr. Carr Bettis.Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015, Dr. Carr Bettis is employed as our Executive Chairman. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is one year commencing July 1, 2015, terminable at will by either us or Dr. Bettis and subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual compensation of $175,000 during the employment period, paid at the end of every calendar quarter in the form of options to purchase shares of our common stock. The number of options to be issued for each quarterly period will be determined by means of a Black Scholes valuation whereby the number of options issued would have a value at the time of issuance equal to the dollar value of Dr. Bettis’ base salary for each calendar quarter. He is entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Dr. Bettis is also entitled to equity awards under our incentive compensation plans. In November, 2015 the board and Dr. Bettis agreed that Dr. Bettis equity awards would be limited to 750,000 options or warrants per quarter and the balance of his compensation would be paid to Dr. Bettis in a form mutually agreeable to Dr. Bettis and the board. On December 22, 2015, subject to shareholder approval of the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan the compensation committee of the board approved a performance option agreement for Dr. Bettis. The number of shares that vest under the performance options are determined based upon the company’s and Dr. Bettis (as applicable) performance compared to performance goals described below. The compensation committee established a target number of shares of 2,000,000 options whereby to each option will vest only upon: (a) satisfaction of a share price condition described below; and (b) 100% achievement of the performance goals by the company and Dr. Bettis, as applicable. Subject to the share price condition, 50% of the target award will be earned by Dr. Bettis at the 85% achievement level, and he can earn up to 150% of the target award at the 125% achievement level. Vesting shall be determined based upon performance measures at the end of each calendar year of 2016 and 2017, with 50% of each target award and performance increase subject to vesting during each performance period. Dr. Bettis shall have the opportunity to achieve full vesting of 100% of the target award and performance increase if there is a shortfall in the first performance period but cumulative performance goals are achieved for the two-year period ending on the measurement date at the end of the second performance period. The number of vested performance options shall be determined for a performance period by reference to the company’s actual achievement against the following performance objectives: (a) Targeted cash contract bookings (as to 33.33%); (b) Targeted net operating cash flow (as to 33.33%); (c) Board defined operations goals (as to 33.33%) for a performance period. And, vesting shall only occur if the closing share price of the company’s common stock on each of the 20 trading days before and including the end of a performance period is not less than $0.20 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, combinations, recapitalization and the like). The company’s board or committee shall in its sole discretion establish goals as to specific matters and amounts with respect to a performance period. The performance options shall have a term of five years from the date of grant and the exercise price shall be determined by using a 10-day average closing price of the company’s common stock over the ten (10) trading days beginning on January 4, 2016, which the committee has determined to be and the Board agrees is an amount that is not less than the fair market value of a share of the common stock of the company on such date.

On December 7, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an extension to and modification of the existing employment contract with Dr. Carr Bettis, as well as the grant of certain equity awards to Dr. Bettis under the Company’s 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan. To best preserve the Company’s limited cash resources, the Employment Contract provides generally that Dr. Bettis’s base compensation is paid in the form of Restricted Stock Units (RSU’s).

Todd Bankofier. Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement dated as of November 10, 2015 Mr. Bankofier was employed as our Chief Executive Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is one year commencing November 10, 2015 and subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual salary of $125,000. Mr. Bankofier is also entitled to equity awards under our incentive compensation plan. On December 22, 2015, subject to shareholder approval of the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan the compensation committee of the board approved a performance option agreement for Mr. Bankofier. The number of shares that vest under the performance options are determined based upon the company’s and Mr. Bankofier (as applicable) performance compared to performance goals described below.

39

The compensation committee established a target number of shares of 2,000,000 options whereby to each option will vest only upon: (a) satisfaction of a share price condition described below; and (b) 100% achievement of the performance goals by the company and Mr. Bankofier, as applicable. Subject to the share price condition, 50% of the target award will be earned by Mr. Bankofier at the 85% achievement level, and he can earn up to 150% of the target award at the 125% achievement level. Vesting shall be determined based upon performance measures at the end of each calendar year of 2016 and 2017, with 50% of each target award and performance increase subject to vesting during each performance period. Mr. Bankofier shall have the opportunity to achieve full vesting of 100% of the target award and performance increase if there is a shortfall in the first performance period but cumulative performance goals are achieved for the two-year period ending on the measurement date at the end of the second performance period. The number of vested performance options shall be determined for a performance period by reference to the company’s actual achievement against the following performance objectives: (a) Targeted cash contract bookings (as to 33.33%); (b) Targeted net operating cash flow (as to 33.33%); (c) Board defined operations goals (as to 33.33%) for a performance period. And, vesting shall only occur if the closing share price of the company’s common stock on each of the 20 trading days before and including the end of a performance period is not less than $0.20 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, combinations, recapitalization and the like). The company’s board or committee shall in its sole discretion establish goals as to specific matters and amounts with respect to a performance period. The performance options shall have a term of five years from the date of grant and the exercise price shall be determined by using a 10-day average closing price of the company’s common stock over the ten (10) trading days beginning on January 4, 2016, which the committee has determined to be and the Board agrees is an amount that is not less than the fair market value of a share of the common stock of the company on such date.

On December 7, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase to the base salary of Todd Bankofier, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Bankofier’s base annual salary was increased to $175,000. Mr. Bankofier also received a restricted stock unit award under the 2016 Plan (the “Bankofier RSUs”). The Bankofier RSUs have a seven-year term and represent the right to receive, subject to the terms and upon the conditions of the RSU award, 250,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, with such number of units to be reduced by the number of shares, if any, that are awarded to Mr. Bankofier in connection with the Performance Option Unit Agreement granted Mr. Bankofier in January 2016 under the 2016 Plan. The Bankofier RSUs vest under the Award Vesting Conditions.

On August 7, 2013, we entered into agreements with the following executive officers:

Sean Bradley. Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, Sean Bradley was employed as our Chief Technology Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is three years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual salary of $195,000 during the employment period. He is entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. Bradley is also entitled to equity awards under the AudioEye, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, the AudioEye, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan and the AudioEye, Inc. 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan. In connection with entry into the Executive Employment Agreement, we and Mr. Bradley terminated the existing employment agreement, dated April 1, 2010, between us and Mr. Bradley effective as of August 7, 2013.

Pursuant to a Performance Share Unit Agreement, Mr. Bradley was granted an award of an aggregate of 200,000 PSUs at target value of established goals. 37.5% of these awards are tied to targeted revenue goals of approximately $1.7 million, $8.0 million and $22 million over the years ended March 31, 2014, March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016, respectively. 37.5% of these awards are tied to a project plan deliverable schedule and related project budget, and 25% are tied to discretionary goals. The award will pay above or below the target number of shares based on performance. In order to receive any shares the threshold value of goals is 75% of the target, which will payout at 100,000 shares. The maximum share payout is 300,000 shares if 125% of performance targets are met. We use interpolation to determine share payouts if the performance metric values achieved are between the threshold, target and maximum goal levels. Pursuant to the first year goals, in 2014 Mr. Sean Bradley was granted 93,750 shares. In the third quarter of 2015 management determined that was highly improbably that any of the 2015 or 2016 performance period targets would be met.

40

Effective April 24, 2015, our board of directors appointed Sean Bradley to serve as President of our company as well as continuing as Chief Technology Officer and Secretary. Effective May 1, 2015, Mr. Bradley agreed to reduce his annual base salary to $150,000. Effective October 1, 2015 the board and Mr. Bradley agreed that in lieu of cash Mr. Bradley would receive up to $6,250 per quarter in compensation in the form of market value of options or warrants. On December 22, 2015, subject to shareholder approval of the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan the compensation committee of the board approved a performance option agreement for Mr. Bradley. The number of shares that vest under the performance options are determined based upon the company’s and Mr. Bradley’s (as applicable) performance compared to performance goals described below. The compensation committee established a target number of shares of 1,500,000 options whereby to each option will vest only upon: (a) satisfaction of a share price condition described below; and (b) 100% achievement of the performance goals by the company and Mr. Bradley, as applicable. Subject to the share price condition, 50% of the target award will be earned by Mr. Bradley at the 85% achievement level, and he can earn up to 150% of the target award at the 125% achievement level. Vesting shall be determined based upon performance measures at the end of each calendar year of 2016 and 2017, with 50% of each target award and performance increase subject to vesting during each performance period. Mr. Bradley shall have the opportunity to achieve full vesting of 100% of the target award and performance increase if there is a shortfall in the first performance period but cumulative performance goals are achieved for the two-year period ending on the measurement date at the end of the second performance period. The number of vested performance options shall be determined for a performance period by reference to the company’s actual achievement against the following performance objectives: (a) Targeted cash contract bookings (as to 33.33%); (b) Targeted net operating cash flow (as to 33.33%); (c) Board defined operations goals (as to 33.33%) for a performance period. And, vesting shall only occur if the closing share price of the company’s common stock on each of the 20 trading days before and including the end of a performance period is not less than $0.20 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, combinations, recapitalization and the like). The company’s board or committee shall in its sole discretion establish goals as to specific matters and amounts with respect to a performance period. The performance options shall have a term of five years from the date of grant and the exercise price shall be determined by using a 10-day average closing price of the company’s common stock over the ten (10) trading days beginning on January 4, 2016, which the committee has determined to be and the Board agrees is an amount that is not less than the fair market value of a share of the common stock of the company on such date.

The Board also approved the grant to Mr. Bradley of a long-term equity component of his compensation in the form of an RSU with a seven-year term representing the right to receive, subject to the terms and upon the conditions of the RSU, 150,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. This RSU is also subject to the Award Vesting Conditions.

Nathaniel Bradley (previous executive). Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, Nathaniel Bradley was employed as our Chief Executive Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is three years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual salary of $200,000 during the employment period. He is entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. Bradley is also entitled to equity awards under the AudioEye, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, the AudioEye, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan and the AudioEye, Inc. 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan. Pursuant to the first year goals, in 2014 Mr. Nathaniel Bradley was granted 83,333 shares. In connection with entry into the Executive Employment Agreement, we and Mr. Bradley terminated the existing employment agreement, dated April 1, 2010, between us and Mr. Bradley effective as of August 7, 2013.

41

Pursuant to a Performance Share Unit Agreement, Mr. Bradley was granted an award of an aggregate of 200,000 Performance Share Units (“PSUs”) at target value of established goals. Each PSU represented the right to receive one share of our common stock. 37.5% of these awards are tied to targeted revenue goals of approximately $1.7 million, $8.0 million and $22 million over the years ended March 31, 2014, March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016, respectively. 37.5% of these awards are tied to targeted cash flow goals over the three years, and 25% are tied to discretionary goals. The award would pay above or below the target number of shares based on performance. In order to receive any shares the threshold value of goals is 75% of the target, which would payout at 100,000 shares. The maximum share payout was 400,000 shares if 125% of performance targets are met. We would use interpolation to determine share payouts if the performance metric values achieved are between the threshold, target and maximum goal levels. In the third quarter of 2015 management determined that was highly improbably that any of the 2015 or 2016 performance period targets would be met.

Effective April 24, 2015, Nathaniel Bradley resigned as Chief Executive Officer and President of our company. Effective with his resignation as Chief Executive Officer and President, our board of directors appointed Mr. Bradley to serve as Founder and Chief Innovation Officer as well as Treasurer of our company. Effective May 1, 2015, Mr. Bradley agreed to reduce his annual base salary to $125,000. Effective August 27, 2015 Mr. Bradley resigned from his position as Chief Innovation Officer and member of the board.

James Crawford (previous executive). Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, James Crawford was employed as our Chief Operating Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is three years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual salary of $185,000 during the employment period. He is entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. Crawford is also entitled to equity awards under the AudioEye, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, the AudioEye, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan and the AudioEye, Inc. 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan.

Pursuant to a Performance Share Unit Agreement, Mr. Crawford was granted an award of an aggregate of 200,000 PSUs at target value of established goals. 75% of these awards are tied to targeted revenue goals of approximately $1.7 million, $8.0 million and $22 million over the years ended March 31, 2014, March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016, respectively and 25% were tied to discretionary goals. The award would pay above or below the target number of shares based on performance. In order to receive any shares the threshold value of goals was 75% of the target, which would payout at 100,000 shares. The maximum share payout was 300,000 shares if 125% of performance targets were met. We would use interpolation to determine share payouts if the performance metric values achieved were between the threshold, target and maximum goal levels. Pursuant to the first year goals, Mr. Crawford was granted 91,667 shares. In the third quarter of 2015 management determined that was highly improbably that any of the 2015 or 2016 performance period targets would be met.

Effective April 24, 2015, James Crawford resigned as Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer of our company.

Also on April 24, 2015, we and Crawdad, LLC. (“Crawdad”), a limited liability company wholly owned by Mr. Crawford, entered into a Consulting Agreement pursuant to which Crawdad, through Mr. Crawford, is to provide certain consulting services to us for a period of 12 months for a consulting fee of $5,000 per month.

The consulting agreement with Crawdad was terminated by mutual agreement on December 31, 2015.

Edward O’Donnell (previous executive). Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, Mr. O’Donnell was employed as our Chief Financial Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement was two years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He was to receive a base annual salary of $165,000 during the employment period. He was entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. O’Donnell was also entitled to equity awards under our incentive compensation plan.

Effective March 29, 2015, Edward O’Donnell resigned from his position as our Chief Financial Officer.

42

Constantine Potamianos (previous executive). Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, Constantine Potamianos was employed as our Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement was two years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He received a base annual salary of $150,000 during the employment period. He was entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. Potamianos was also entitled to equity awards under the AudioEye, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, the AudioEye, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan and the AudioEye, Inc. 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan.

On August 7, 2015 Constantine Potamianos employment contract expired.

Paul Arena (previous executive).On January 27, 2014, we entered into agreements with Paul Arena. Under an Executive Employment Agreement dated as of January 27, 2014, Mr. Arena had direct responsibility working in conjunction with our Chief Executive Officer, over operations, sales marketing, financial accounting and SEC reporting, operational budgeting, sales costing analysis, billing and auditor interfacing. The initial term of Mr. Arena’s employment was two years. Mr. Arena’s base salary was $275,000 per year. Mr. Arena received a signing bonus of $35,000 and was entitled to a quarterly bonus of up to $50,000 based on recognized revenues for the applicable quarter and additional bonuses at the discretion of our board of directors or compensation committee. Mr. Arena had been granted five year warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share and stock options to purchase 1,500,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.40 per share subject to vesting as set forth in the Executive Employment Agreement. Pursuant to a separate Performance Share Unit Agreement dated as of January 27, 2014, we granted to Mr. Arena an award of up to 3,000,000 PSUs. Each PSU represented the right to receive one share of common stock. The number of PSUs that Mr. Arena actually earned would have been determined by the level of achievement of the performance goals set forth in the Performance Share Unit Agreement. Mr. Arena was granted an award of an aggregate of 1,500,000 PSUs at target value of established goals. 35% of these awards were tied to targeted revenue goals over the years ended January 31, 2015 and January 31, 2016. 35% of these awards were tied to targeted cash flow goals over the years, and 30% are tied to discretionary goals. The award would pay above or below the target number of shares based on performance. In order to receive any shares the threshold value of goals is 75% of the target, which would payout at 1,000,000 shares. The maximum share payout was 3,000,000 shares if 125% of performance targets were met. We would have used interpolation to determine share payouts if the performance metric values achieved were between the threshold, target and maximum goal levels. Even though in the third quarter of 2015 management determined that was highly improbably that any of the 2015 or 2016 performance period targets would be met, this determination was preempted by the Separation and Release Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) discussed below.

On March 5, 2015, we and Paul Arena entered into a Separation Agreement pursuant to which Mr. Arena resigned as Executive Chairman/Chairman of the Board and a member of our board of directors. Under the Separation Agreement, we and Mr. Arena agreed that, pursuant to his Stock Option Agreement with us, options to purchase 500,000 common shares were vested, options to purchase an additional 500,000 shares (the “Second Tranche”) vested and options to purchase 500,000 shares were forfeited. Fifty percent of the options under the Second Tranche were subject to certain clawback provisions as set forth in the Separation Agreement and were clawed back due to the restatement of financial information for 2014. Additionally, Mr. Arena was granted 500,000 shares of our restricted common stock (the “Restricted Shares”) with 250,000 shares to be deposited in escrow to cover the clawback rights of our company. The Restricted Shares were clawed back due to the restatement of financial information for 2014. The Restricted Shares were being issued to Mr. Arena in lieu of any issuances which may be due him under his Performance Share Unit Agreement. The Restricted Shares and shares issuable pursuant to options described above were subject to a Lock-up/Leakage Agreement under which Mr. Arena is limited to a cap of $50,000 in gross proceeds from the sale of such shares in any month.

Also on March 5, 2015, we and AIM Group, Inc. (“AIM”), a corporation wholly owned by Mr. Arena, entered into a Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) pursuant to which AIM, through Mr. Arena, is to provide certain consulting services to us for a period of one year. Under the Consulting Agreement, AIM received a one-time net payment of $267,000.

43

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

 

Seasonality

We do not have a seasonal business cycle. Our revenues and operating profits are generally derived evenly throughout the months of the year.

Climate Change

We do not believe there is anything unique to our business which would result in climate change regulations having a disproportional effect on us as compared to U.S. industry overall.

Impact of Inflation

We believe that inflation has not had a material impact on our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. We cannot assure you that future inflation will not have an adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition.

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Preparing financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by our management’s application of accounting policies. We believe that understanding the basis and nature

The following is a summary of the estimates and assumptions involved with the following aspects ofCompany’s most critical accounting policies. Refer to Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies to our financial statements is critical to an understandingincluded in Part II, Item 8 for a complete discussion of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our financial statements.

 


Revenue Recognition

 

Revenue

The Company derives revenue primarily from the sale of internally-developed software by a software as a service (“SaaS”) delivery model, through our direct sales force or through our Partner and Marketplace channel. SaaS fees include support and maintenance. The Company also derives revenue from PDF remediation and Mobile App report services. The Company recognizes revenue when delivery of the promised goods or services is transferred to its customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration that the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services.

Performance obligations are the unit of accounting for revenue recognition and generally represent the distinct goods or services that are promised to the customer. If we determine that we have not satisfied a performance obligation, we will defer recognition of the revenue until the performance obligation is deemed to be satisfied. SaaS agreements are generally non-cancelable, although clients typically have the right to terminate their contracts for cause if we fail to perform material obligations.

Our SaaS (also referred to as “subscription”) revenue is recognized on a ratable basis over the contractual subscription term of the arrangement beginning on the date that our service is made available to the customer. Certain SaaS fees are invoiced in advance on an annual, semi-annual, or quarterly basis. Any funds received for services not provided yet are held in deferred revenue and are recorded as revenue when all applicable recognition criteriathe related performance obligations have been met, which generally include (a) persuasive evidencesatisfied.

Non-subscription revenue consists of an existing arrangement; (b) fixed or determinable price; (c) delivery has occurred or service has been rendered;PDF remediation and (d) collectability of the sales priceMobile App report services and is reasonably assured. For software and technology development contracts the Company recognizes revenuesrecognized upon delivery. Consideration payable under these arrangements is based on a percentage of completion method based upon several factors including but not limitedusage.

Refer to (a) estimate of total hours and milestonesNote 3 - Significant Accounting Policies to complete; (b) total hours completed; (c) delivery of services rendered; (d) changeour financial statements included in estimates; and (e) collectability of the contract.Part II, Item 8 for additional information regarding our revenue recognition policies.

 

Use of EstimatesAllowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

The preparationAccounts receivables are comprised of financial statements in conformityamounts owed the Company for solutions and services purchased. Contracts with GAAP requires managementindividual clients and resellers determine when receivables are due and payable. In determining the allowances for doubtful accounts, the unpaid receivables are reviewed periodically to determine the payment status based upon the most currently available information. During these periodic reviews, the Company determines the required allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the unwillingness or inability of its clients or resellers to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include the fair value of the Company’s stock, stock-based compensation, fair values relating to derivative liabilities, debt discounts and the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets. Actual results may differ from these estimates.required payments.

 

44

Stock based compensationStock-Based Compensation

 

The Company measures the cost of services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award. For employees and directors, the fair value of the award is measured on the grant date and for non-employees, the fair value of the award is generally re-measured on vesting dates and interim financial reporting dates until the service period is complete.date. The fair value amount is then recognized over the requisite vesting period during which services are required to be provided in exchange for the award, usuallyaward.

The fair value of options and warrants awards is measured on the grant date using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. We estimate the fair value of restricted stock unit awards with time- or performance-based vesting period. using the value of our common stock on the date of grant. We estimate the fair value of restricted stock units with market-based conditions using a Monte Carlo simulation model on the date of grant.

Stock-based compensation expense is recorded by the Company in the same expense classifications in the consolidated statements of operations as if such amounts were paid in cash.Refer to Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies to our financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 for additional information regarding our stock-based compensation.

 

Derivative Instrument LiabilityCapitalization of Software Development Costs

The Company accounts for derivative instruments inIn accordance with ASC 815, which establishes accounting350-40, the Company capitalizes certain computer software and reporting standardssoftware development costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining computer software for derivative instrumentsinternal use when both the preliminary project stage is completed, and hedging activities, including certain derivative instruments embeddedit is probable that the software will be used as intended. Capitalized software costs include only (i) external direct costs of materials and services utilized in other financial instrumentsdeveloping or contractsobtaining computer software and requires recognition(ii) compensation and related benefits for employees who are directly associated with the software project. Capitalized software costs are included in intangible assets on our balance sheet and amortized on a straight-line basis when placed into service over the estimated useful lives of all derivativesthe software. Amortization expense is included in cost of revenue on the balance sheet at fair value, regardlessstatements of hedging relationship designation. Accounting for changes in fair value of the derivative instruments depends on whether the derivatives qualify as hedge relationships and the types of relationships designated are based on the exposures hedged. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not have any derivative instruments that were designated as hedges.operations.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There are various updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to a have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

As a “smaller reporting company,” we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.Not applicable.

 

Item 8.      Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

Our Financial Statements begin on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 9.     Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

 

Conclusions of Management Regarding Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

At the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of and with the participation of our management, including the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operations of ourThe Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a – 15(e) and Rule 15d 15(e) underthat are designed to ensure that there is reasonable assurance that the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in ensuring that: (i) information required to be disclosed byin the Company inCompany’s reports that it files or submits tounder the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicablethe SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) materialthat such information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to ourthe Company’s management, including our CEOits Interim Chief Executive Officer and CFO,Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for accurate and timely decisions regarding required disclosure.disclosure based on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures to future periods are subject to the risk that controls or procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the controls or procedures may deteriorate.

 

45

DisclosureAs of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s senior management, including the Interim Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures. In light of the material weaknesses noted below, our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due primarilyeffective.

The Company assessed the material weaknesses’ impact to athe financial statements to ensure they were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and present fairly the financial results of operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020. Management concluded that the financial statements included in this Form 10-K present fairly, in all material weakness in the segregation of duties inaspects, the Company’s internal controlfinancial position, results of financial reporting as discussed below.operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

 


Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) and all related information appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

1.pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

 

2.provide reasonable assurance that the transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of management and/or of our Board of Directors; and

3.provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely detection of any unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness in future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management Our management (with the participation of our Interim Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer) conducted an evaluation of the design and operationeffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria in a framework developed by the Company’s management pursuant to and in compliance with2020 using the criteria established in Internal Control — 2013 Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included reviewCommission (COSO).

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the documentationCompany’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

In connection with management’s assessment of controls, evaluationour internal control over financial reporting, management has identified the following deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of the design effectivenessDecember 31, 2020:

1.A lack of segregation of duties.

2.A lack of formal policies that provide for multiple levels of supervision and reviews.

Because of controls, walkthroughs of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Based on this evaluation,these material weaknesses, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2016, because management identified a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting related to the segregation of duties as described below.

The Company concluded it is difficult with a very limited staff to maintain appropriate segregation of duties in the initiating and recording of transactions, thereby creating a segregation of duties weakness. Due to: (i) the significance of segregation of duties to the preparation of reliable financial statements; (ii) the significance of potential misstatement that could have resulted due to the deficient controls; and (iii) the absence of sufficient other mitigating controls, we determined that this control deficiency resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement or lack of disclosure within the2020. This annual or interim financial statements may not be prevented or detected.

Management’s Remediation Initiatives

This Annual Reportreport does not include an attestation report of the Company’sour registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report wasis not subject to attestation by the Company’sour registered, public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Companyus to provide only Management’smanagement’s report in this Annual Report.annual report.


Management’s Internal Control Remediation Initiatives

 

As part of our efforts to continuously improve our finance and accounting function and to remediate the material weaknesses that existed in our internal control over financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures, we have developed a remediation plan (the “Remediation Plan”) pursuant to which we have implemented, or plan to implement over the next few quarters, a number of measures. The Remediation Plan, among other things, includes the following:

 46·Staffing: We hired a new Controller and an accountant and have introduced new levels of reviews. We intend to add another member to our accounting team to allow for further increased segregation of duties and multiple level of reviews.
 ·Systems: We have implemented a cloud-based accounting software and are currently optimizing its usage, and plan on investing in few software solutions to enhance our processes and documentation in critical areas such as stock-based compensation.
·Policies and procedures: In addition to continue to document and implement formal policies and procedures to further enhance the controls over financial reporting, we plan to engage internal control consultants to assist in improving the design and documentation of our internal controls of financial reporting, as well as testing their operating effectiveness.

 

Management has evaluated, and continuesWe believe that actions taken to evaluate, avenues for mitigatingdate have improved our internal control over financial reporting, but we have not completed all corrective processes and procedures discussed above. The Remediation Plan, however, may not be sufficient to remedy the material weaknesses. Further, the material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until the applicable controls weaknesses, but mitigatingoperate for a sufficient period of time and management is able to conclude, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. We will continue to completely mitigatemonitor the effectiveness of our internal control weaknesses have beenover financial reporting and implement any new resources and policies deemed necessary by management to be impractical and prohibitively costly, due to the size ofensure that our organization at the current time. Management expects to continue to use reasonable care in following and seeking improvements to effective internal control processes that have been andfinancial statements continue to be in use at the Company. Because of the inherent limitationsfairly stated in all material respects.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended December 31, 2020, there were no changes to our internal control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assuranceover financial reporting that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occurhave materially affected, or that allare reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control issues within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks.over financial reporting, except as disclosed above.

 

Item 9B.  Other Information

 

None.Not applicable.

 


PART III

 

Item 10.   Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

The following information required by this item is ashereby incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of March 25, 2017Stockholders, which proxy statement is anticipated to be filed with respect to those persons who are serving as our directorsthe Securities and executive officers.

NameAgeDirector/Position
Dr. Carr Bettis53Executive Chairman/Chairman of the Board, and Director
Todd Bankofier56Chief Executive Officer
Sean Bradley36President, Chief Technology Officer, and Secretary
Anthony Coelho74Director
Christine Griffin66Director
Ernest Purcell65Director
Alexandre Zyngier47Director

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of each director and executive officer during at least the past five years, indicating each person’s principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which he was employed.Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2020.

 

Dr. Carr Bettis. Dr. Bettis has served as a director of ours since December 2012, and previously served as a director of ours from July 2007 to April 2010. Dr. Bettis has served as Executive Chairman/Chairman of the Board since March 2015. Dr. Bettis founded and has been the Chief Architect of numerous financial technology innovations and businesses over the last 15 years thatWe have been acquired by Merrill Lynch, Thomson Financial, Primark/Disclosure and Advanced Equities/Greenbook Financial. From 1996 to 2011, Dr. Bettis was the Chairman and Founder of Gradient Analytics, one of the largest independent equity research firms in the United States. He has served as Chairman and Co-Founder of Verus Analytics, a quantitative analytics and financial technology firm since 1996. He also serves on the board of directors of iMemories, an Arizona-founded technology company. Since 2007, he has also managed his family’s private equity portfolio via his firm, Fathom Lab. Dr. Bettis is a former tenured professor and maintains a clinical-affiliation with Arizona State University as Research Professor of Finance at the W.P. Carey School of Business. He is frequently cited in national and international financial media. His research has been published in academic and professional journals such as the Journal of Financial Economics, Review of Financial Studies, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, and the Financial Analyst Journal. Dr. Bettis holds undergraduate degrees in finance and accounting, and received his Ph.D. from Indiana University in 1992. We believe that Dr. Bettis’ extensive education and background in finance makes him qualified to serve as our Executive Chairman/Chairman of the Board and as a director.

47

Todd Bankofier.Mr. Bankofier was principal in Fairmont Capital Group (FCG) since 2008, Mr. Bankofier was responsible for day-to-day oversight of multiple asset holdings, including strategic planning, revenue generation, technology evolution, operational effectiveness and public relations for all FCG entities.

Mr. Bankofier served as General Manager of Ensynch, which was at the time one of Arizona’s largest Information Technology services companies. He was President and CEO of the Arizona Technology Council (ATC) from 2002 to 2006. Before joining the ATC, he spent four years as Vice President of National Sales for XO Communications, a national telecommunications company, where he managed a national sales team to four years of record sales growth for that company. Mr. Bankofier also served in Washington, D.C. for four years as a lobbyist for the Department of Energy, and served as Chief of Staff for Maricopa County Supervisor, Jim Bruner. He serves on the Advisory Board of Mutual of Omaha Bank, and he has served on the Arizona Governor’s Council for Innovation and Technology. He received a gubernatorial appointment to the State Board of Education (1998-2002). We believe that Mr. Bankofiers’ extensive experience in leadership roles in technology companies makes him qualified to serve as our Chief Executive Officer.

Sean Bradley. Mr. Bradley has been involved with us from our founding in 2005 to the present and has served as Secretary since April 2010, as Vice President from April 2010 to April 2015, as a director from August 2012 to June 2014, and as Chief Technology Officer since August 2012, and as President since April 2015. Mr. Bradley has co-founded several technology companies, including Kino Digital, LLC, and Kino Communications, LLC, from 1999-2005. Over the past ten years, he has led an international team of software developers, has produced global webcasting technologies, and planned, designed and managed the fulfillment of intellectual property assets, including the next generation mobile marketing solutions for industry leading Hipcricket. In the past, Mr. Bradley was chief architect of AdLife, BoomBox® Video and Audio Platforms for Augme Technologies, Inc. Mr. Bradley is proficient in several programming and web development languages and has engineered online communications systems for IBM, General Dynamics, Avnet and many others. In 2005, he was recognized by Arizona State’s WP Carey School of Business as a leader in his field for work he completed for the Arizona Department of Health and Human Services.

 Mr. Bradley is a former managing member of Bradley Brothers, LLC, an Arizona-based investment company. We believe that Mr. Bradley’s extensive education and background in business and technology make him qualified to serve as our President, Chief Technology Officer and Secretary. In 2003, Mr. Bradley obtained his BA from Arizona International College at the University of Arizona, graduating summa cum laude and with highest academic distinction for all eight undergraduate semesters.

Anthony Coelho. Mr. Coelho has served as a director since June 2014. Mr. Coelho was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1978 to 1989, where he authored the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). After leaving Congress, he joined Wertheim Schroder & Company, an investment banking firm in New York and became President and CEO of Wertheim Schroder Financial Services from 1990 to 1995. From 1995 to 1997, he served as Chairman and CEO of an education and training technology company that he established and subsequently sold. In 1998, President Clinton appointed him as the U.S. Commissioner General for the World’s Fair in Lisbon Portugal. He served as general chairman of the presidential campaign of former Vice President Al Gore from April 1999 until June 2000. Since 1997, Mr. Coelho has worked independently as a business and political consultant. Mr. Coelho also served as Chairman of the President’s Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities from 1994 to 2001. He previously served as Chairman of the Board of the Epilepsy Foundation. Mr. Coelho has served on a number of corporate boards. In the last five years he has served on the boards of CepTor Corporation, Cyberonics, Inc., Stem Cell Innovation, Inc., Universal Access Global Holdings, Inc, and since 1991, he has been a member of the board of Service Corporation International, a publicly traded company, and since 2001, he has been a member of the board of Warren Resources, Inc., a publicly traded company. Mr. Coelho earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from Loyola Marymount University in 1964. We believe that Mr. Coelho’s political acumen and contacts as well as his extensive executive, financial and business experience makes him qualified to serve as a director.

48

Christine Griffin.Ms. Griffin has served as a director since November 2015. Since 2013, Christine Griffin has served as the Executive Director of the Disability Law Center, a position that she held previously from 1996 to 2005. Ms. Griffin also served as the Assistant Secretary for Disability Policies and Programs for the Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services. As such, she was responsible for oversight of the Department of Developmental Services, the Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission, the Massachusetts Commission for the Blind, the Massachusetts Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, and the Soldiers’ Homes in Chelsea and Holyoke. Additionally, she had cross-Secretariat responsibility for disability-related policies and programs. Ms. Griffin has an extensive history of work involving disability across public and private sectors. As Deputy Director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, she was responsible for federal agencies’ implementation of President Obama’s Executive Order on Increasing Employment of Individuals with Disabilities in the Federal Workforce. Ms. Griffin also planned and implemented the first federal hiring event for people with disabilities and oversaw the creation of a newly established Government-wide Diversity and Inclusion Office. As a Commissioner on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, she was responsible for the development of enforcement policies, and she planned and presided over public EEOC hearings and investigations of federal employee complaints. She also established the LEAD (Leadership for Employment of Americans with Disabilities) Initiative, a national outreach and education campaign to address the declining number of federal employees with severe disabilities.

Ms. Griffin began her legal career as a Skadden Fellow at the Disability Law Center, where she provided outreach, training and representation on ADA issues to un-served and underserved communities within the disabled community in Massachusetts. With a history of providing capable leadership involving a range of disability policy issues, Ms. Griffin is currently Chair of the Board of the American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD) and a member of the Massachusetts Developmental Disabilities Council. Ms. Griffin, who holds a law degree from Boston College and earned her undergraduate degree from the Massachusetts Maritime Academy, also served on active duty in the United States Army from 1974 until 1977. We believe that Mrs. Griffin’s extensive education, private enterprise, public service and extensive background in accessibility related solutions makes her qualified to serve as a director.

Ernest Purcell. Mr. Purcell has served as a director of ours since March 2014. Mr. Purcell has more than two decades of experience in the financial services and advisory industries and has been involved in providing fairness and solvency opinions on numerous U.S. and European transactions. He has technical expertise in financial due diligence, strategic business valuation, financial restructurings and divestitures. Since 1997, Mr. Purcell has been employed by Houlihan Lokey, Inc., where he is currently a Senior Managing Director, a member of the Board of Directors of their European and Asian subsidiaries, and the Head of International Financial Advisory Services. Houlihan Lokey is an international investment bank with expertise in mergers and acquisitions, capital markets, financial restructuring, and valuation. The firm serves corporations, institutions, and governments worldwide with offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Houlihan Lokey is ranked as the No. 1 global restructuring advisor, the No. 1 M&A fairness opinion advisor for U.S. transactions over the past 10 years, and the No. 1 M&A advisor for U.S. transactions under $3 billion, according to Thomson Reuters. Mr. Purcell is based in Houlihan Lokey’s Miami office, having recently returned to the U.S. after serving more than six years in the London office. With significant experience in the valuation of securitized vehicles and structured investment vehicles, Mr. Purcell has advised numerous hedge fund and private equity sponsors on the valuation of their portfolio assets. He has structured, negotiated, and closed complex financial and capital transactions in many industries, including transportation, financial services, telecommunications, energy, aviation, consumer products and industrial products. From 1989 to 1996, Mr. Purcell served in a number of positions with Valuemetrics, Inc. / VM Equity Partners, where he specialized in the valuation of publicly owned and privately held companies, strategic financial planning, and bankruptcy analysis. Mr. Purcell earned bachelor’s degree in Economics and Finance from the University of Florida in 1973 and earned his MBA, with concentrations in Finance and Statistics, from the University of Chicago. He is a member of the Institute of Directors, British American Business and the Corporate Development Association. He is also a member of the Valuation Special Interest Group of the Institute of Chartered Financial Accountants in England and Wales, the Society of Share and Business Valuers, and the Business Valuation Association. We believe that Mr. Purcell’s extensive education and background in finance makes him qualified to serve as a director.

49

Alexandre Zyngier.Mr. Zyngier has served as a director since September 2015. Mr. Zyngier founded Batuta Advisors in 2013 to pursue high return investment opportunities in the distressed and turnaround sectors. Mr. Zyngier has over 20 years of investment, strategy, and operating experience. He is currently a director of GT Advanced Technologies and Atari SA. Mr. Zyngier has worked as a Portfolio Manager, investing in public and private opportunities, at Alden Global Capital, Goldman Sachs & Co. and Deutsche Bank Co. He was also a strategy consultant at McKinsey & Company and a technical brand manager at Procter & Gamble. Mr. Zyngier holds an MBA in Finance and Accounting from the University of Chicago and a BSc. in Chemical Engineering from UNICAMP in Brazil. We believe that Mr. Zyngier’s extensive education and background in finance and strategy makes him qualified to serve as a director.

All of our directors hold office until the next annual meeting of the stockholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their death, resignation or removal from office.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Company maintainsadopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, applicable to all directors, officers and other employeesincluding provisions enumerated in Item 406 of Regulation S-K (the “finance code of ethics”). The finance code of ethics is publicly available in the Company. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available without charge upon request in writingon the Governance Documents section of our website, which may be accessed from our homepage at www.audioeye.com.  If we make any substantive amendments to AudioEye, Inc. at 5210 E. Williams Circle, Suite 750, Tucson, AZ 85711 Attention: Operations.

Audit Committee

Our boardthe finance code of directors has established an audit committee, which represents and assistsethics or grant any waiver, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relatingcode to our financial statementsChief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, or Chief Accounting Officer and financial reporting process. Our audit committee is currently comprisedCorporate Controller, we will disclose the nature of Anthony Coehlo, Ernest Purcell and Alexandre Zyngier. Mr. Purcell isthat amendment or that waiver in the chairmanGovernance Documents section of our audit committee and qualifies as an audit financial expert, as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K, based on his extensive experience as an investment banker analyzing and evaluating financial statements.website.

 

Item 11.   Executive Compensation

 

The table below summarizes the compensation paid to the following persons:

(a) our principal executive officer;

(b)  each of our two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the year ended December 31, 2016; and

(c) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (b) but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the years ended December 31, 2016, who we will collectively refer to as the named executive officers of our company, are set out in the following summary compensation table, except that no disclosureinformation required by this item is provided for any named executive officer, other than our principal executive officer, whose total compensation did not exceed $100,000 for the respective fiscal year:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

                Non-Equity  Change in Pension
Value and
       
          Stock  Option/Warrant  Incentive Plan  Nonqualified Deferred  All Other    
Name and Principal   Salary  Bonus  Awards  Awards  Compensation  Compensation  Compensation  Total 
Position Year ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  Earnings  ($)  ($) 
Dr. Carr Bettis 2016 $-   -   72,917(1) $178,903(2) $14,580(3)  -   -  $266,400 
Executive Chairman, 2015 $-   -   200,000(4) $253,563(5) $72,944(6)  -   -  $526,507 
Chairman and Director                                  
                                   
Todd Bankofier 2016 $139,721   -   -  $24,451(7)  -   -   -  $164,172 
Chief Executive Officer 2015 $18,220   -   -  $14,329(8)  -   -   -  $32,549 
                                   
Sean Bradley 2015 $151,202   -   -  $38,752(9)  -   -   -  $189,954 
President, Chief Technology 2015 $143,699   -   -   -   -   -   -  $143,699 
Officer, Vice President, Secretary                                  

50

(1)Dr. Carr Bettis was granted a restricted stock award with performance based vesting and compensation of $72,917.

(2)Dr. Carr Bettis was granted 500,000 options on January 4, 2016 with a total market value of $9,018 at grant date, 250,000 warrants on January 5, 2016 with a total market value of $29,876 at grant date; 500,000 warrants on February 29, 2016 with a total market value of $28,058 at grant date; 347,995 warrants on April 15, 2016 with a total market value of $43,750 at grant date; 394,625 warrants on July 15, 2016 with a total market value of $43,750 at grant date; 2,000,000 performance based units on January 1, 2016 with a total market value at grant date of $24,451.

(3)Dr. Carr Bettis was entitled to $87,497 in compensation for the period July 1 to December 31, 2016. He has been granted restricted stock units with a value of $72,917 for that period. The difference of $14,580 is a liability of the Company.

(4)Dr. Carr Bettis was granted 1,250,000 shares on June 2, 2015 with a total market value of $200,000 at grant date

(5)Dr. Carr Bettis was granted 2,000,000 warrants on June 2, 2015 with a total market value of $239,007 and granted 500,000 options and 250,000 options on October 26, 2015 with a market value of $14,556 at grant dates.

(6)Dr. Carr Bettis was entitled to $87,500 in compensation for the period from July 1 to December 31, 2015. He has been granted options and warrants with a value of $14,666 for that period. The difference of $72,944 is a liability to the Company at December 31, 2015.

(7)Todd Bankofier was granted 2,000,000 performance based units on January 1, 2016 with a total market value at grant date of $24,451.

(8)Todd Bankofier, in his capacity as Advisory Board member was granted 150,000 options on June 2, 2015 with a total market value of $14,359 at grant date.

(9)Sean Bradley was granted 150,000 options on January 4, 2016 with a market value of $2,706 at grant date; 49,715 options on April 15, 2016 with a market value of $6,250 at grant date; 56,375 options on July 15, 2016 with a market value of $6,250 at grant date; 61,599 options on October 15, 2016 with a market value of $5,209 at grant date and performance based units on January 1, 2016, with a total market value of $18,337 at grant date.

Director Compensation

We have no formal plan for compensating our directors for their service in their capacity as directors and have not paid any director’s fees or other cash compensation for services rendered as a director since our inception. Although no director received and or/accrued any compensation specifically related to services as a director, directors may receive options at the discretion of our board of directors or a committee, which may be established in the future. Edward Withrow III, one of our former directors, was granted options to purchase 225,000 shares on December 19, 2012 as remuneration for services not related to his service as a director. The options have an exercise price of $0.25 per share with an aggregate fair market value of $54,903 at grant date. On August 20, 2013, we granted options to purchase 200,000 shares to each of Craig Columbus (a former director of ours), Dr. Carr Bettis and Edward Withrow III (a former director). The options have an exercise price of $0.50 per share and a term of five years with an aggregate fair market of $130,591 at grant date. In connection with the election of Ernest Purcell to our board, Mr. Purcell was granted five year options to purchase up to 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share with an aggregate fair market value of $37,805 at grant date.

51

In connection with the election of Anthony Coelho to our board, Mr. Coelho was granted five-year options to purchase up to 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share with an aggregate fair market value of $44,503 at grant date. In connection with the election of Matthew Mellon II (a former director of ours) to our board, Mr. Mellon was granted five-year options to purchase up to 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.65 per share with an aggregate fair market value of $101,248 at grant date. Mr. Mellon returned these options to our company when he resigned in April 2015.

In June 2015, our board of directors granted to Dr. Carr Bettis in connection with his service as Executive Chairman/Chairman of the Board 1,250,000 shares of our common stock and five-year warrants to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.16 per share with an aggregate fair market value of $328,309 at grant date. In June 2015, our board of directors granted to Ernest Purcell in connection with his service as Chairman of the Audit Committee 800,000 shares of our common stock and five-year warrants to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.16 per share with an aggregate fair market value of $190,608 at grant date.

In October 2015, our board of directors granted to Anthony Coelho and to Ernest Purcell each five-year options to purchase up to 750,000 shares of common stock at exercise price of $0.041, each with an aggregate fair value of $18.952 at grant date. In connection with the election of Alexandre Zyngier to our board, and pursuant to his role as Compensation Committee Chairman, our board granted Mr. Zyngier 750,000 five-year options with an exercise price of $0.041 per share was an aggregate fair value of $18,952 at grant date.

In connection with the election of Christine Griffin to our board, in November 2015, our board granted Ms. Griffin 500,000 five-year options with an exercise $0.049 per share was an aggregate fair value of $15,150 at grant date.

In May 2016, our board of directors granted to Anthony Coelho, Christine Griffin, Alexandre Zyngier and to Ernest Purcell each five-year options to purchase up to 700,000 shares of common stock at exercise price of $0.177, each with an aggregate fair value of $115,212 at grant date. In additional, our board of directors granted Ernest Purcell and Alexandre Zyngier each five-year options to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.177, each with an aggregate fair value of $49,377 at grant date for service as committee chairs.

Employment Contracts with Executive Officers

Our objective is to align the compensation of our senior executives with long term value creation for our stockholders. As such, we use certain performance goals to determine the number of shares that they are eligible to receive each year.

Dr. Carr Bettis.Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015, Dr. Carr Bettis is employed as our Executive Chairman. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is one year commencing July 1, 2015, terminable at will by either us or Dr. Bettis and subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual compensation of $175,000 during the employment period, paid at the end of every calendar quarter in the form of options to purchase shares of our common stock. The number of options to be issued for each quarterly period will be determined by means of a Black Scholes valuation whereby the number of options issued would have a value at the time of issuance equal to the dollar value of Dr. Bettis’ base salary for each calendar quarter. He is entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Dr. Bettis is also entitled to equity awards under our incentive compensation plans. In November, 2015 the board and Dr. Bettis agreed that Dr. Bettis equity awards would be limited to 750,000 options or warrants per quarter and the balance of his compensation would be paid to Dr. Bettis in a form mutually agreeable to Dr. Bettis and the board. On December 22, 2015, subject to shareholder approval of the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan the compensation committee of the board approved a performance option agreement for Dr. Bettis. The number of shares that vest under the performance options are determined based upon the company’s and Dr. Bettis (as applicable) performance compared to performance goals described below.

52

The compensation committee established a target number of shares of 2,000,000 options whereby to each option will vest only upon: (a) satisfaction of a share price condition described below; and (b) 100% achievement of the performance goals by the company and Dr. Bettis, as applicable. Subject to the share price condition, 50% of the target award will be earned by Dr. Bettis at the 85% achievement level, and he can earn up to 150% of the target award at the 125% achievement level. Vesting shall be determined based upon performance measures at the end of each calendar year of 2016 and 2017, with 50% of each target award and performance increase subject to vesting during each performance period. Dr. Bettis shall have the opportunity to achieve full vesting of 100% of the target award and performance increase if there is a shortfall in the first performance period but cumulative performance goals are achieved for the two-year period ending on the measurement date at the end of the second performance period. The number of vested performance options shall be determined for a performance periodhereby incorporated by reference to the company’s actual achievement against the following performance objectives: (a) Targeted cash contract bookings (as to 33.33%); (b) Targeted net operating cash flow (as to 33.33%); (c) Board defined operations goals (as to 33.33%)definitive proxy statement for a performance period. And, vesting shall only occur if the closing share priceour 2021 Annual Meeting of the company’s common stock on each of the 20 trading days before and including the end of a performance periodStockholders, which proxy statement is not less than $0.20 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, combinations, recapitalization and the like). The company’s board or committee shall in its sole discretion establish goals as to specific matters and amounts with respect to a performance period. The performance options shall have a term of five years from the date of grant and the exercise price shall be determined by using a 10-day average closing price of the company’s common stock over the ten (10) trading days beginning on January 4, 2016, which the committee has determinedanticipated to be and the Board agrees is an amount that is not less than the fair market value of a share of the common stock of the company on such date.

On December 7, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an extension to and modification of the existing employment contract with Dr. Carr Bettis, as well as the grant of certain equity awards to Dr. Bettis under the Company’s 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan. To best preserve the Company’s limited cash resources, the Employment Contract provides generally that Dr. Bettis’s base compensation is paid in the form of Restricted Stock Units (RSU’s).

Todd Bankofier. Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement dated as of November 10, 2015 Mr. Bankofier was employed as our Chief Executive Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is one year commencing November 10, 2015 and subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual salary of $125,000. Mr. Bankofier is also entitled to equity awards under our incentive compensation plan. On December 22, 2015, subject to shareholder approval of the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan the compensation committee of the board approved a performance option agreement for Mr. Bankofier. The number of shares that vest under the performance options are determined based upon the company’s and Mr. Bankofier (as applicable) performance compared to performance goals described below. The compensation committee established a target number of shares of 2,000,000 options whereby to each option will vest only upon: (a) satisfaction of a share price condition described below; and (b) 100% achievement of the performance goals by the company and Mr. Bankofier, as applicable. Subject to the share price condition, 50% of the target award will be earned by Mr. Bankofier at the 85% achievement level, and he can earn up to 150% of the target award at the 125% achievement level.

Vesting shall be determined based upon performance measures at the end of each calendar year of 2016 and 2017, with 50% of each target award and performance increase subject to vesting during each performance period. Mr. Bankofier shall have the opportunity to achieve full vesting of 100% of the target award and performance increase if there is a shortfall in the first performance period but cumulative performance goals are achieved for the two-year period ending on the measurement date at the end of the second performance period. The number of vested performance options shall be determined for a performance period by reference to the company’s actual achievement against the following performance objectives: (a) Targeted cash contract bookings (as to 33.33%); (b) Targeted net operating cash flow (as to 33.33%); (c) Board defined operations goals (as to 33.33%) for a performance period. And, vesting shall only occur if the closing share price of the company’s common stock on each of the 20 trading days before and including the end of a performance period is not less than $0.20 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, combinations, recapitalization and the like). The company’s board or committee shall in its sole discretion establish goals as to specific matters and amounts with respect to a performance period.

53

The performance options shall have a term of five years from the date of grant and the exercise price shall be determined by using a 10-day average closing price of the company’s common stock over the ten (10) trading days beginning on January 4, 2016, which the committee has determined to be and the Board agrees is an amount that is not less than the fair market value of a share of the common stock of the company on such date.

On December 7, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase to the base salary of Todd Bankofier, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Bankofier’s base annual salary was increased to $175,000. Mr. Bankofier also received a restricted stock unit award under the 2016 Plan (the “Bankofier RSUs”). The Bankofier RSUs have a seven-year term and represent the right to receive, subject to the terms and upon the conditions of the RSU award, 250,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, with such number of units to be reduced by the number of shares, if any, that are awarded to Mr. Bankofier in connectionfiled with the Performance Option Unit Agreement granted Mr. Bankofier in January 2016 under the 2016 Plan. The Bankofier RSUs vest under the Award Vesting Conditions.

On August 7, 2013, we entered into agreements with the following executive officers:

Sean Bradley. Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, Sean Bradley was employed as our Chief Technology Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is three years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual salary of $195,000 during the employment period. He is entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. Bradley is also entitled to equity awards under the AudioEye, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, the AudioEye, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation PlanSecurities and the AudioEye, Inc. 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan. In connection with entry into the Executive Employment Agreement, we and Mr. Bradley terminated the existing employment agreement, dated April 1, 2010, between us and Mr. Bradley effective as of August 7, 2013.

Pursuant to a Performance Share Unit Agreement, Mr. Bradley was granted an award of an aggregate of 200,000 PSUs at target value of established goals. 37.5% of these awards are tied to targeted revenue goals of approximately $1.7 million, $8.0 million and $22 million over the years ended March 31, 2014, March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016, respectively. 37.5% of these awards are tied to a project plan deliverable schedule and related project budget, and 25% are tied to discretionary goals. The award will pay above or below the target number of shares based on performance. In order to receive any shares the threshold value of goals is 75% of the target, which will payout at 100,000 shares. The maximum share payout is 300,000 shares if 125% of performance targets are met. We use interpolation to determine share payouts if the performance metric values achieved are between the threshold, target and maximum goal levels. Pursuant to the first year goals, in 2014 Mr. Sean Bradley was granted 93,750 shares. In the third quarter of 2015 management determined that was highly improbably that any of the 2015 or 2016 performance period targets would be met.

Effective April 24, 2015, our board of directors appointed Sean Bradley to serve as President of our company as well as continuing as Chief Technology Officer and Secretary. Effective May 1, 2015, Mr. Bradley agreed to reduce his annual base salary to $150,000. Effective October 1, 2015 the board and Mr. Bradley agreed that in lieu of cash Mr. Bradley would receive up to $6,250 per quarter in compensation in the form of market value of options or warrants. On December 22, 2015, subject to shareholder approval of the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan the compensation committee of the board approved a performance option agreement for Mr. Bradley. The number of shares that vest under the performance options are determined based upon the company’s and Mr. Bradley’s (as applicable) performance compared to performance goals described below.

54

The compensation committee established a target number of shares of 1,500,000 options whereby to each option will vest only upon: (a) satisfaction of a share price condition described below; and (b) 100% achievement of the performance goals by the company and Mr. Bradley, as applicable. Subject to the share price condition, 50% of the target award will be earned by Mr. Bradley at the 85% achievement level, and he can earn up to 150% of the target award at the 125% achievement level. Vesting shall be determined based upon performance measures at the end of each calendar year of 2016 and 2017, with 50% of each target award and performance increase subject to vesting during each performance period. Mr. Bradley shall have the opportunity to achieve full vesting of 100% of the target award and performance increase if there is a shortfall in the first performance period but cumulative performance goals are achieved for the two-year period ending on the measurement date at the end of the second performance period. The number of vested performance options shall be determined for a performance period by reference to the company’s actual achievement against the following performance objectives: (a) Targeted cash contract bookings (as to 33.33%); (b) Targeted net operating cash flow (as to 33.33%); (c) Board defined operations goals (as to 33.33%) for a performance period. And, vesting shall only occur if the closing share price of the company’s common stock on each of the 20 tradingExchange Commission within 120 days before and including the end of a performance period is not less than $0.20 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, combinations, recapitalization and the like). The company’s board or committee shall in its sole discretion establish goals as to specific matters and amounts with respect to a performance period. The performance options shall have a term of five years from the date of grant and the exercise price shall be determined by using a 10-day average closing price of the company’s common stock over the ten (10) trading days beginning on January 4, 2016, which the committee has determined to be and the Board agrees is an amount that is not less than the fair market value of a share of the common stock of the company on such date.

The Board also approved the grant to Mr. Bradley of a long-term equity component of his compensation in the form of an RSU with a seven-year term representing the right to receive, subject to the terms and upon the conditions of the RSU, 150,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. This RSU is also subject to the Award Vesting Conditions.

Nathaniel Bradley(previous executive). Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, Nathaniel Bradley was employed as our Chief Executive Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is three years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual salary of $200,000 during the employment period. He is entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. Bradley is also entitled to equity awards under the AudioEye, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, the AudioEye, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan and the AudioEye, Inc. 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan. Pursuant to the first year goals, in 2014 Mr. Nathaniel Bradley was granted 83,333 shares. In connection with entry into the Executive Employment Agreement, we and Mr. Bradley terminated the existing employment agreement, dated April 1, 2010, between us and Mr. Bradley effective as of August 7, 2013.

Pursuant to a Performance Share Unit Agreement, Mr. Bradley was granted an award of an aggregate of 200,000 Performance Share Units (“PSUs”) at target value of established goals. Each PSU represented the right to receive one share of our common stock. 37.5% of these awards are tied to targeted revenue goals of approximately $1.7 million, $8.0 million and $22 million over the years ended March 31, 2014, March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016, respectively. 37.5% of these awards are tied to targeted cash flow goals over the three years, and 25% are tied to discretionary goals. The award would pay above or below the target number of shares based on performance. In order to receive any shares the threshold value of goals is 75% of the target, which would payout at 100,000 shares. The maximum share payout was 400,000 shares if 125% of performance targets are met. We would use interpolation to determine share payouts if the performance metric values achieved are between the threshold, target and maximum goal levels. In the third quarter of 2015 management determined that was highly improbably that any of the 2015 or 2016 performance period targets would be met. 

55

Effective April 24, 2015, Nathaniel Bradley resigned as Chief Executive Officer and President of our company. Effective with his resignation as Chief Executive Officer and President, our board of directors appointed Mr. Bradley to serve as Founder and Chief Innovation Officer as well as Treasurer of our company. Effective May 1, 2015, Mr. Bradley agreed to reduce his annual base salary to $125,000. Effective August 27, 2015 Mr. Bradley resigned from his position as Chief Innovation Officer and member of the board.

James Crawford(previous executive). Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, James Crawford was employed as our Chief Operating Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is three years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual salary of $185,000 during the employment period. He is entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. Crawford is also entitled to equity awards under the AudioEye, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, the AudioEye, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan and the AudioEye, Inc. 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan.

Pursuant to a Performance Share Unit Agreement, Mr. Crawford was granted an award of an aggregate of 200,000 PSUs at target value of established goals. 75% of these awards are tied to targeted revenue goals of approximately $1.7 million, $8.0 million and $22 million over the years ended March 31, 2014, March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016, respectively and 25% were tied to discretionary goals.  The award would pay above or below the target number of shares based on performance. In order to receive any shares the threshold value of goals was 75% of the target, which would payout at 100,000 shares. The maximum share payout was 300,000 shares if 125% of performance targets were met. We would use interpolation to determine share payouts if the performance metric values achieved were between the threshold, target and maximum goal levels. Pursuant to the first year goals, Mr. Crawford was granted 91,667 shares. In the third quarter of 2015 management determined that was highly improbably that any of the 2015 or 2016 performance period targets would be met.

Effective April 24, 2015, James Crawford resigned as Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer of our company.

Also on April 24, 2015, we and Crawdad, LLC. (“Crawdad”), a limited liability company wholly owned by Mr. Crawford, entered into a Consulting Agreement pursuant to which Crawdad, through Mr. Crawford, is to provide certain consulting services to us for a period of 12 months for a consulting fee of $5,000 per month.

The consulting agreement with Crawdad was terminated by mutual agreement onafter December 31, 2015.2020.

Edward O’Donnell (previous executive). Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, Mr. O’Donnell was employed as our Chief Financial Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement was two years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He was to receive a base annual salary of $165,000 during the employment period. He was entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. O’Donnell was also entitled to equity awards under our incentive compensation plan.

Effective March 29, 2015, Edward O’Donnell resigned from his position as our Chief Financial Officer.

Constantine Potamianos (previous executive). Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, Constantine Potamianos was employed as our Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement was two years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He received a base annual salary of $150,000 during the employment period. He was entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. Potamianos was also entitled to equity awards under the AudioEye, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, the AudioEye, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan and the AudioEye, Inc. 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan.

On August 7, 2015 Constantine Potamianos employment contract expired.

56

Paul Arena (previous executive).On January 27, 2014, we entered into agreements with Paul Arena. Under an Executive Employment Agreement dated as of January 27, 2014, Mr. Arena had direct responsibility working in conjunction with our Chief Executive Officer, over operations, sales marketing, financial accounting and SEC reporting, operational budgeting, sales costing analysis, billing and auditor interfacing. The initial term of Mr. Arena’s employment was two years. Mr. Arena’s base salary was $275,000 per year. Mr. Arena received a signing bonus of $35,000 and was entitled to a quarterly bonus of up to $50,000 based on recognized revenues for the applicable quarter and additional bonuses at the discretion of our board of directors or compensation committee. Mr. Arena had been granted five year warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share and stock options to purchase 1,500,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.40 per share subject to vesting as set forth in the Executive Employment Agreement. Pursuant to a separate Performance Share Unit Agreement dated as of January 27, 2014, we granted to Mr. Arena an award of up to 3,000,000 PSUs. Each PSU represented the right to receive one share of common stock. The number of PSUs that Mr. Arena actually earned would have been determined by the level of achievement of the performance goals set forth in the Performance Share Unit Agreement. Mr. Arena was granted an award of an aggregate of 1,500,000 PSUs at target value of established goals. 35% of these awards were tied to targeted revenue goals over the years ended January 31, 2015 and January 31, 2016. 35% of these awards were tied to targeted cash flow goals over the years, and 30% are tied to discretionary goals. The award would pay above or below the target number of shares based on performance. In order to receive any shares the threshold value of goals is 75% of the target, which would payout at 1,000,000 shares. The maximum share payout was 3,000,000 shares if 125% of performance targets were met. We would have used interpolation to determine share payouts if the performance metric values achieved were between the threshold, target and maximum goal levels. Even though in the third quarter of 2015 management determined that was highly improbably that any of the 2015 or 2016 performance period targets would be met, this determination was preempted by the Separation and Release Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) discussed below.

On March 5, 2015, we and Paul Arena entered into a Separation Agreement pursuant to which Mr. Arena resigned as Executive Chairman/Chairman of the Board and a member of our board of directors. Under the Separation Agreement, we and Mr. Arena agreed that, pursuant to his Stock Option Agreement with us, options to purchase 500,000 common shares were vested, options to purchase an additional 500,000 shares (the “Second Tranche”) vested and options to purchase 500,000 shares were forfeited. Fifty percent of the options under the Second Tranche were subject to certain clawback provisions as set forth in the Separation Agreement and were clawed back due to the restatement of financial information for 2014. Additionally, Mr. Arena was granted 500,000 shares of our restricted common stock (the “Restricted Shares”) with 250,000 shares to be deposited in escrow to cover the clawback rights of our company. The Restricted Shares were clawed back due to the restatement of financial information for 2014. The Restricted Shares were being issued to Mr. Arena in lieu of any issuances which may be due him under his Performance Share Unit Agreement. The Restricted Shares and shares issuable pursuant to options described above were subject to a Lock-up/Leakage Agreement under which Mr. Arena is limited to a cap of $50,000 in gross proceeds from the sale of such shares in any month.

Also on March 5, 2015, we and AIM Group, Inc. (“AIM”), a corporation wholly owned by Mr. Arena, entered into a Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) pursuant to which AIM, through Mr. Arena, is to provide certain consulting services to us for a period of one year. Under the Consulting Agreement, AIM received a one-time net payment of $267,000.

57

AudioEye, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan, AudioEye, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan, AudioEye, Inc. 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan, AudioEye, Inc. 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan, and AudioEye, Inc. 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan

On December 19, 2012, our board of directors and holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock adopted and approved the AudioEye, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2012 Plan”); on August 20, 2013, our board of directors and holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock adopted and approved the AudioEye, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2013 Plan”); on January 27, 2014, our board of directors adopted and approved and on March 5, 2014 holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock adopted and approved the AudioEye, Inc. 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2014 Plan”); and on September 5, 2014, our board of directors adopted and approved and, on September 10, 2014, holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock adopted and approved the AudioEye, Inc. 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2015 Plan”, and together with the 2014 Plan, 2013 Plan and the 2012 Plan, the “Plans”). Our board of directors has approved a 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan that is still subject to approval by the majority of shareholders. The purpose of the Plans is to assist us in attracting, motivating, retaining and rewarding high-quality executives and other employees, officers, directors, consultants and other persons who provide services to us. The following summary of the Plans is qualified in its entirety by the specific language of the Plans.

Administration. The Plans are to be administered by a committee elected by the board of directors, provided, however, that except as otherwise expressly provided in the Plans, the board of directors may exercise any power or authority granted to the committee upon formation under the Plans. Subject to the terms of the Plans, the committee is authorized to select eligible persons to receive awards, determine the type, number and other terms and conditions of, and all other matters relating to, awards, prescribe award agreements (which need not be identical for each participant), and the rules and regulations for the administration of the Plans, construe and interpret the Plans and award agreements, and correct defects, supply omissions or reconcile inconsistencies in them, and make all other decisions and determinations as the committee may deem necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plans.

Eligibility. The persons eligible to receive awards under the Plans are the officers, directors, employees, consultants and other persons who provide services to us. An employee on leave of absence may be considered as still in the employ of ours for purposes of eligibility for participation in the Plans.

Types of Awards. The Plans provide for the issuance of stock options, performance stock units, stock appreciation rights, or SARs, restricted stock, deferred stock, warrants, dividend equivalents, bonus stock and awards in lieu of cash compensation, other stock-based awards and performance awards. Performance awards may be based on the achievement of specified business or personal criteria or goals, as determined by the committee.

Shares Available for Awards; Annual Per Person Limitations. The total number of shares of common stock that may be subject to the granting of awards under each of the Plans at any time during the term of each of the Plans is equal to 5,000,000 shares. This limit will be increased by the number of shares with respect to which awards previously granted under the Plans that are forfeited, expire or otherwise terminate without issuance of shares, or that are settled for cash or otherwise do not result in the issuance of shares, and the number of shares that are tendered (either actually or by attestation) or withheld upon exercise of an award to pay the exercise price or any tax withholding requirements.

The Plans impose individual limitations on the amount of certain awards. Under these limitations, during any fiscal year of ours, the number of options, stock appreciation rights, shares of restricted stock, shares of deferred stock, performance shares and other stock based-awards granted to any one participant under the Plans may not exceed 500,000 shares, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The maximum amount that may be paid out as performance units in any 12-month performance period is $250,000, and the maximum amount that may be paid out as performance units in any performance period greater than 12 months is $500,000.

The board of directors is authorized to adjust the limitations described in the two preceding paragraphs. The board of directors is also authorized to adjust performance conditions and other terms of awards in response to these kinds of events or in response to changes in applicable laws, regulations or accounting principles.

58

Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. The board of directors is authorized to grant stock options, including both incentive stock options, or ISOs, which can result in potentially favorable tax treatment to the participant, and non-qualified stock options, and stock appreciation rights entitling the participant to receive the amount by which the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of exercise exceeds the grant price of the stock appreciation right. The exercise price per share subject to an option and the grant price of a stock appreciation rights are determined by the board of directors, but in the case of an ISO must not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant. For purposes of the Plans, the term “fair market value” means the fair market value of common stock, awards or other property as determined by the board of directors or under procedures established by the committee upon formation. The maximum term of each option or stock appreciation right, the times at which each option or stock appreciation right will be exercisable, and provisions requiring forfeiture of unexercised options or stock appreciation rights at or following termination of employment generally are fixed by the committee, except that no option or stock appreciation right may have a term exceeding ten years.

Restricted and Deferred Stock. The board of directors is authorized to grant restricted stock and deferred stock. Restricted stock is a grant of shares of common stock which may not be sold or disposed of, and which may be forfeited in the event of certain terminations of employment, prior to the end of a restricted period specified by the committee. A participant granted restricted stock generally has all of the rights of a stockholder of ours, unless otherwise determined by the board of directors. An award of deferred stock confers upon a participant the right to receive shares of common stock at the end of a specified deferral period, subject to possible forfeiture of the award in the event of certain terminations of employment prior to the end of a specified restricted period. Prior to settlement, an award of deferred stock carries no voting or dividend rights or other rights associated with share ownership, although dividend equivalents may be granted, as discussed below.

Dividend Equivalents. The board of directors is authorized to grant dividend equivalents conferring on participants the right to receive, currently or on a deferred basis, cash, shares of common stock, other awards or other property equal in value to dividends paid on a specific number of shares of common stock or other periodic payments. Dividend equivalents may be granted alone or in connection with another award, may be paid currently or on a deferred basis and, if deferred, may be deemed to have been reinvested in additional shares of common stock, awards or otherwise as specified by the board of directors.

Bonus Stock and Awards in Lieu of Cash Obligations. The board of directors is authorized to grant shares of common stock as a bonus free of restrictions, or to grant shares of common stock or other awards in lieu of our obligations to pay cash under the Plans or other plans or compensatory arrangements, subject to such terms as the board of directors may specify.

Other Stock Based Awards. The board of directors is authorized to grant awards that are denominated or payable in, valued by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to shares of common stock. The board of directors determines the terms and conditions of such awards.

Performance Awards. The board of directors is authorized to grant performance awards to participants on terms and conditions established by the board of directors. Performance awards may be settled by delivery of cash, shares or other property, or any combination thereof, as determined by the board of directors. Performance awards granted to persons whom the committee expects will, for the year in which a deduction arises, be “covered employees” (as defined below) will, if and to the extent intended by the board of directors, be subject to provisions that should qualify such awards as “performance based compensation” not subject to the limitation on tax deductibility by us under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).

The board of directors may, in its discretion, determine that the amount payable as a performance award will be reduced from the amount of any potential award.

59

Other Terms of Awards. Awards may be settled in the form of cash, shares of common stock, other awards or other property, in the discretion of the board of directors. The board of directors may require or permit participants to defer the settlement of all or part of an award in accordance with such terms and conditions as the committee may establish, including payment or crediting of interest or dividend equivalents on deferred amounts, and the crediting of earnings, gains and losses based on deemed investment of deferred amounts in specified investment vehicles. The board of directors is authorized to place cash, shares of common stock or other property in trusts or make other arrangements to provide for payment of our obligations under the Plan.

Awards under the Plans are generally granted without a requirement that the participant pay consideration in the form of cash or property for the grant (as distinguished from the exercise), except to the extent required by law. The committee may, however, grant awards in exchange for other awards under the Plan, awards under other company plans or other rights to payment from us, and may grant awards in addition to and in tandem with such other awards, rights or other awards.

Acceleration of Vesting; Change in Control. The board of directors may, in its discretion, accelerate the exercisability, the lapsing of restrictions or the expiration of deferral or vesting periods of any award, and such accelerated exercisability, lapse, expiration and if so provided in the award agreement or otherwise determined by the committee, vesting will occur automatically in the case of a “change in control” of our company, as defined in the Plans (including the cash settlement of stock appreciation rights which may be exercisable in the event of a change in control). In addition, the board of directors may provide in an award agreement that the performance goals relating to any performance award will be deemed to have been met upon the occurrence of any “change in control.”

Amendment and Termination. The board of directors may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate the Plans or upon formation determine the committee’s authority to grant awards without further stockholder approval, except stockholder approval must be obtained for any amendment or alteration if such approval is required by law or regulation or under the rules of any stock exchange or quotation system on which shares of common stock are then listed or quoted. Thus, stockholder approval may not necessarily be required for every amendment to the Plans, which might increase the cost of the Plans or alter the eligibility of persons to receive awards. Stockholder approval will not be deemed to be required under laws or regulations, such as those relating to ISOs, that condition favorable treatment of participants on such approval, although the board of directors may, in its discretion, seek stockholder approval in any circumstance in which it deems such approval advisable. The Plans will terminate at the earliest of (a) such time as no shares of common stock remain available for issuance under the Plans, (b) termination of the applicable Plan by the board of directors, or (c) the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the applicable Plan. Awards outstanding upon expiration of the applicable Plan will remain in effect until they have been exercised or terminated, or have expired.

60

INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information regarding grants of plan-based awards to each of our named executive officers at December 31, 2016.

          All Other       
    Estimated  All Other  Option/Warrant       
    Future  Stock  Awards:       
    Payments  Awards:  Number of       
    under Equity  Number of  Shares  Exercise Price  Grant Date Fair 
    Incentive  Shares of  Underlying  of Option  Value of Stock 
    Plan Awards  Stock or  Options  Awards  and Option 
Name Grant Date (1) Target ($)  Units (#)  (#)(1)  ($/Share)  Awards ($)(2) 
                       
Dr. Carr Bettis 1/4/2016  -   2,000,000   -  $0.15  $29,500 
  1/4/2016  -   -   500,000  $0.038  $9,018 
  1/15/2016  -   -   250,000  $0.038  $29,876 
  2/29/2016          500,000  $0.077  $28,058 
  4/15/2016          347,995  $0.179  $43,750 
  7/15/2016  -   -   394,625  $0.156  $43,750 
                       
Todd Bankofier 1/4/2016  -   2000,000   -  $0.15  $29,500 
                       
Sean Bradley 1/4/2016  -   1,500,000   -  $0.15  $22,129 
  1/4/2016          150,000  $0.038  $2,706 
  4/15/2016          49,715  $0.179  $6,250 
  7/15/2016          56,375  $0.156  $6,250 
  10/15/2016          61,599  $0.125  $5,209 

(1)The amounts in the column under “Grant Date Fair Value of Option Awards” represent the fair value of the awards on the date of grant, as computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation.

Outstanding Equity Awards

The following table sets forth certain information concerning unexercised stock options for each of our named executive officers at December 31, 2016:

  Number of  Number of        Number of    
  securities  securities        shares or  Market value 
  underlying  underlying  Option/     units of  of shares or 
  unexercised  unexercised  Warrant  Option/Warrant  stock that  units of stock 
Named Executive options/warrants (#)  options/warrants (#)  Exercise  Expiration  have not  that have not 
Officer Exercisable  Unexercisable  Price ($)  Date  vested (#)  vested ($) 
Dr. Carr Bettis  200,000(1)  -  $0.5   8/20/2018   -   - 
   215,625(1)  84,375  $0.45   3/24/2019         
   500,000(2)  -  $0.041   1/15/2019   -   - 
   -(3)  2,000,000  $0.038   1/15/2021   -   - 
   750,000(4)     $0.041   10/26/2018   -   - 
   46,875(5)   - $0.60   12/31/2019   -   - 
   2,000,000(6)  -  $0.16   6/2/2020   -   - 
   250,000(7)  -  $0.038   2/14/2019   -   - 
   500,000(8)  -  $0.077   2/28/2019   -   - 
   347,995(9)  -  $0.179   4/14/2019   -   - 
   394,625(10)  -  $0.156   7/15/2019   -   - 
                         
Todd Bankofier  150,000(11)  -  $0.016   6/2/2018   -   - 
   -   2,000,000  $0.038   1/15/2021   -   - 
                         
Sean Bradley  93,750    - $0.25   12/19/17         
   150,000(12)  -  $0.038   1/15/2019   -   - 
   -(13)  1,500,000  $0.038   1/15/2021   -    - 
   49,715(14)  -  $0.179   4/15/2019   -   - 
   56,375(15)  -  $0.156   7/15/2019   -   - 
   61,599(16)  -  $0.125   10/15/2019   -   - 
   1,471,091(17)  -  $0.25   3/19/2018   -   - 
   20,833(18)  -  $0.25   3/31/2018   -   - 
   3,200(19)  -  $0.40   11/12/2018   -   - 

61

1.Dr. Carr Bettis was granted 200,000 options on August 20, 2013 and 300,000 options on March 24, 2014 as an independent director.

2.Dr. Carr Bettis was granted 500,000 options on January 15, 2016 pursuant to his July 1, 2015 employment agreement.

3.Dr. Carr Bettis was granted 2,000,000 options on January 15, 2016 pursuant to his July 1, 2015 employment agreement.

4.Dr. Carr Bettis was granted 500,000 options and 250,000 warrants on October 26, 2016 pursuant to his July 1, 2015 employment agreement.

5.Dr. Carr Bettis was granted 46,875 warrants on December 31, 2014 as part of his participation in a private placement.

6.Dr. Carr Bettis was granted 2,000,000 warrants on June 2, 2015 in his capacity as Executive Chairman before his employment agreement.

7.Dr. Carr Bettis was granted 250,000 warrants on January 15, 2016 pursuant to his July 1, 2015 employment agreement.

8.Dr. Carr Bettis was granted 500,000 warrants on February 29, 2016 pursuant to his July 1, 2015 employment agreement.

9.Dr. Carr Bettis was granted 347,995 warrants on April 15, 2016 pursuant to his July 1, 2015 employment agreement.

10.Dr. Carr Bettis was granted 394,625 warrants on July 15, 2016 pursuant to his July 1, 2015 employment agreement.

11.Todd Bankofier was granted 150,000 options on June 2, 2015 in his capacity as advisory board member.

12.Mr. Sean Bradley was granted 150,000 options on January 15, 2016 pursuant to his July 1, 2015 employment agreement.

13.Mr. Sean Bradley was granted 2,000,000 options on January 15, 2016 pursuant to his July 1, 2015 employment agreement.

14.Mr. Sean Bradley was granted 49,715 options on April 15, 2016 pursuant to his July 1, 2015 employment agreement.

15.Mr. Sean Bradley was granted 56,375 options on July 15, 2016 pursuant to his July 1, 2015 employment agreement.

16.Mr. Sean Bradley was granted 61,599 options on October 15, 2016 pursuant to his July 1, 2015 employment agreement.

17.Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,471,091 shares of common stock were issued to Sean Bradley as the related party payables forgiven.

18.Warrants to purchase up to 20,833 shares of common stock were granted to Sean Bradley in consideration for the release of related party payables.

19.Warrants to purchase up to 3,200 shares of common stock were granted to Sean Bradley in consideration for the release of related party payables.

62

Change in Control

There are no arrangements currently in effect, which may result in our “change in control,” as that term is defined by the provisions of Item 403(c) of Regulation S-K.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table gives the information about common stock that may be issued upon exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2016:

        (c) 
        Number of securities 
        remaining available for 
  (a)  (b)  future issuance under 
  Number of securities to  Weighted-average  equity compensation 
  be issued upon exercise  exercise price of  plans (excluding 
  of outstanding options,  outstanding options,  securities reflected in 
Plan Category warrants and rights  warrants and rights  column (a)) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  30,283,827  $0.25   4,716,173 
             
Total  30,283,827   -   4,716,173 

 

Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

The following table sets forth information regardingrequired by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the beneficial ownershipdefinitive proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of our common stock as of March 25, 2017 by:

·each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock;

·each of our named executive officers and directors; and

·all of our officers and directors as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment powerStockholders, which proxy statement is anticipated to be filed with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them.

For purposes of this table, “beneficial ownership” is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d) promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Act pursuant to which a person is deemed to have beneficial ownership of any shares of common stock that such stockholder has the right to acquireCommission within 60120 days of March 25, 2017. Unless otherwise noted, each person or group identified possesses sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares, subject to community property laws where applicable. The inclusion of any securities in the following table does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership by the persons named below.after December 31, 2020.

63

Name of Beneficial Owner Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned (1)
  Percentage
of Common
Stock
Owned
(1)(2)
 
       
5% Owners        
David Moradi (3)  11,163,240(4)  9.99%
         
Nathan Bradley (5)  11,853,091(6)  10.40%
         
Martin Shkreli (7)  9,066,692(8)  7.74%
         
KTK Capital Inc. (9)  13,238,005(10)  11.26%
         
Officers and Directors        
Dr. Carr Bettis (11)  19,610,335(12)  16.22%
         
Todd Bankofier  627,142(13)  * 
         
Sean Bradley  7,330,756(14)  6.44%
         
Anthony Coelho  1,575,000(15)  1.39%
         
Christine Griffin  1,025,000(16)  * 
         
Ernest Purcell (17)  10,790,321(18)  9.34%
         
Alexandre Zyngier (19)  4,001,142(20)  3.49%
         
All directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons)  44,959,696   34.77%

* Less than 1%

Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each of the individuals is 5210 E. Williams Circle, Suite 750, Tucson, Arizona 85711.

(1)Shares of common stock beneficially owned and the respective percentages of beneficial ownership of common stock assume the exercise of all options and other securities convertible into common stock beneficially owned by such person or entity currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017, except as otherwise noted. Shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and other securities convertible into common stock exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding and held by the holder of such options or other securities for computing the percentage of outstanding common stock beneficially owned by such person, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of outstanding common stock beneficially owned by any other person.

(2)These percentages have been calculated based on 111,744,142 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 25, 2017.

64

(3)Mr. Moradi’s business address is c/o Anthion Management LLC, 379 West Broadway, New York, New York 10012.

(4)Comprised of (i) 3,639,113 shares of common stock, warrants to purchase 2,939,583 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017, the terms of which such warrants include a “blocker” provision that restricts conversion to the extent the securities beneficially owned by the selling stockholder and its affiliates would represent beneficial ownership in excess of 9.99% of shares of our common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such conversion, and 3,123,584 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 50,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock; and (ii) 1,592,571 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 33,103,310 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017, the terms of which such warrants include a “blocker” provision that restricts conversion to the extent the securities beneficially owned by the selling stockholder and its affiliates would represent beneficial ownership in excess of 9.99% of shares of our common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such conversion, held by Anthion Partners II, LLC, an entity for which Mr. Moradi is deemed the beneficial owner.

(5)Former director and executive of the Company, Nathan Bradley’s business address is 504 W. 29th Street Tucson, AZ 85713.

(6)Comprised of (i) 249,075 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,724,555 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017; (ii) 6,694,700 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 946,667 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017 held by Bradley Brothers LLC, an entity for which Mr. Bradley is deemed the beneficial owner; (iii) 1,211,764 shares of common stock held by Bradley Lecrone Investment Group LP, an entity for which Mr. Bradley is deemed the beneficial owner; (iv) 32,900 shares of common stock held by Nathan Bradley IRA, an entity for which Mr. Bradley is deemed the beneficial owner; and (v) 993,430 shares of common stock held by Lecrone Bradley Asset Holdings LP, an entity deemed for which Mr. Bradley is deemed the beneficial owner.

(7)Mr. Shrkeli’s business address is 245 E. 40th Street, Apt 18H, New York, NY 10016.

(8)Comprised of 3,614,983 shares of common stock, warrants to purchase 2,328,125 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017 and 3,123,584 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 50,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

(9)KTK Capital’s business address is 100 South Pointe Drive #1501, Miami Beach, FL 33139.

(10)Comprised of (i) 5,861,349 shares of common stock, warrants to purchase 2,234,375 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017 and 624,717 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 10,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock; and (ii) 4,517,564 shares of common stock held by Keith Kosow, an entity for which KTK Capital is deemed the beneficial owner.

(11)Dr. Bettis business address is c/o Fathom Lab LLC, 16211 N. Scottsdale Rd, Suite A6A-628, Scottsdale, AZ 85254.

65

(12)Comprised of (i) 1,250,000 shares of common stock, options to purchase 1,431,250 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2016 and warrants to purchase 3,742,620 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017; (ii) 11,408,070 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 292,000 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017 held by CSB IV US Holdings LLC, an entity for which Mr. Bettis is deemed the beneficial owner; (iii) 115,000 shares of common stock held by Carr Bettis IRA, an entity for which Mr. Bettis is deemed the beneficial owner; and (iv) 699,803 shares of common stock, warrants to purchase 46,875 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017 and 624,717 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 10,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and accrued dividends held by J. Carr & Stephanie V. Bettis Revocable Trust, Dated 1/1/03, an entity for which Mr. Bettis is deemed the beneficial owner

(13)Comprised of 228,571 shares of common stock, options to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017 and warrants to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017.

(14)Comprised of (i) 169,587 shares of common stock, options to purchase 411,439 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017, warrants to purchase 1,495,124 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017 and 256,571 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 4,107 shares of Series A Preferred Stock; and (ii) 4,998,035 shares of common stock held by Banyon Tree LLC, an entity for which Mr. Bradley is deemed the beneficial owner.

(15)Consists of 50,000 shares of common stock and options to purchase 1,525,000 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017.

(16)Consists of vested stock options to purchase up to 1,025,000 shares.

(17)Mr. Purcell’s business address is c/o Houlihan Lokey, Inc., 1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1130, Miami, FL 33131.

(18)Comprised of (i) 4,885,603 shares of common stock, options to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017, warrants to purchase 1,180,000 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017 and 624,717 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 10,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock; and (ii) 2,100,001 shares of common stock held by Ernest W. Purcell & Anne M. Purcell JTTENN, an entity for which Mr. Purcell is deemed the beneficial owner.

(19)Mr. Zyngier’s business address is 475 Park Avenue South, Floor 12, New York, NY 10016.

(20)Comprised of (i) options to purchase 1,750,000 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017; and (ii) 1,251,142 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2017 held by Equity Trust Custodian, FBO Alexandre Zyngier IRA, an entity for which Mr. Zyngier is deemed the beneficial owner.

66

 

Item 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

 

Dr. Carr Bettis, Executive ChairmanThe information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which proxy statement is anticipated to be filed with the Securities and Chairman of Board of Directors

As ofExchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company owed Dr. Bettis $20,575 and $72,944, respectively, in accrued salary. In addition, AudioEye sub-leases an office for the Company’s CEO Todd Bankofier from Verus Analytics, Inc, a company in which Dr. Bettis has a controlling interest. The sub-lease amount is $500 per month totaling $6,000 and $1,000 in 2016 and 2015, respectively. The amount of $0 and $1,000 in rent payable is included within accounts payable within the balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. At December 31, 2016, there was an estimated $8,000 was due and accrued to Dr. Bettis for unreimbursed travel related expenses.2020.

On January 4, 2016, the Company issued to 500,000 options, which vest immediately, have an exercise price of $0.038, and expire January 4, 2019, to Dr. Bettis for services.

On January 15, 2016, the Company granted to Dr. Bettis 2,000,000 performance options to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.038 per share with a term of five years. Vesting shall only occur if the closing share price of the Company’s common stock on each of the 20 trading days before and including the end of any performance period is not less than $0.20 per share (market condition) and include performance conditions (as defined) with both conditions (market and performance) to be met before vesting. All determinations of whether performance goals have been achieved, the number of vested performance options earned by Dr. Bettis, and all other matters related to the award of performance options shall be made by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors in its sole discretion.

In December 7, 2016, the Company granted Dr. Bettis 602,620 RSUs for accrued and unpaid compensation for the period from July 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016 in the amount of $72,917 The RSUs vest upon the satisfaction of both of the following conditions: (i) Officer remains in service to the Company continuously through and until June 30, 2017, and (ii) the Company undergoes a change of control during the seven-year term of the award.

On December 7, 2016, the Company granted to Dr. Bettis 250,000 RSUs with a seven-year term representing the right to receive, subject to the terms and upon the conditions of the RSU, 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, with such number of shares to be reduced by the number of shares, if any, that are awarded to Dr. Bettis in connection with the Performance Option Unit Agreement granted Dr. Bettis in January 2016 under the 2016 Plan. These RSU is also subject the following conditions: (i) Dr. Bettis remains in service to the Company continuously through and until June 30, 2017, and (ii) the Company undergoes a change of control during the seven-year term of the award.

Sean Bradley, President, Chief Technology Officer, and Secretary

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company owed Sean Bradley $3,543 and 6,250, respectively, in accrued salary. 

On January 15, 2016, the Company granted to Mr. Bradley 1,500,000 performance options to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.038 per share with a term of five years. Vesting shall only occur if the closing share price of the Company’s common stock on each of the 20 trading days before and including the end of any performance period is not less than $0.20 per share (market condition) and include performance conditions (as defined) with both conditions (market and performance) to be met before vesting. All determinations of whether performance goals have been achieved, the number of vested performance options earned by Mr. Bradley, and all other matters related to the award of performance options shall be made by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors in its sole discretion.

67

On December 7, 2016, the Company granted to Mr. Bradley 150,000 RSUs with a seven-year term representing the right to receive, subject to the terms and upon the conditions of the RSU, 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. These RSU is also subject the following conditions: (i) Mr. Bradley remains in service to the Company continuously through and until June 30, 2017, and (ii) the Company undergoes a change of control during the seven-year term of the award.

Todd Bankofier, Chief Executive Officer

On January 15, 2016, the Company granted to Mr. Bankofier 2,000,000 performance options to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.038 per share with a term of five years. Vesting shall only occur if the closing share price of the Company’s common stock on each of the 20 trading days before and including the end of any performance period is not less than $0.20 per share (market condition) and include performance conditions (as defined) with both conditions (market and performance) to be met before vesting. All determinations of whether performance goals have been achieved, the number of vested performance options earned by Mr. Bankofier, and all other matters related to the award of performance options shall be made by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors in its sole discretion.

On December 7, 2016, the Company granted to Mr. Bankofier 250,000 RSUs with a seven-year term representing the right to receive, subject to the terms and upon the conditions of the RSU, 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. These RSU is also subject the following conditions: (i) Mr. Bankofier remains in service to the Company continuously through and until June 30, 2017, and (ii) the Company undergoes a change of control during the seven-year term of the award.

Anthony Coelho, member of the Company’s Board of Directors

On May 12, 2016, the Company granted 700,000 options to the Mr. Coelho, which vest 50% immediately and 50% vesting quarterly over 12 months, have an exercise price of $0.177, and expire on May 12, 2021, for services.

Christine Griffin, member of the Company’s Board of Directors

On May 12, 2016, the Company granted 700,000 options to the Ms. Griffin, which vest 50% immediately and 50% vesting quarterly over 12 months, have an exercise price of $0.177, and expire on May 12, 2021, for services.

Ernest W. Purcell, member of the Company’s Board of Directors

On May 12, 2016, the Company granted 1,000,000 options to the Mr. Purcell, which vest 50% immediately and 50% vesting quarterly over 12 months, have an exercise price of $0.177, and expire on May 12, 2021, for services.

On December 22, 2015, subject to shareholder approval of the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan the compensation committee of the board approved a performance option agreement for Mr. Purcell. The compensation committee established a target number of shares of 1,000,000 options whereby to each option will vest only upon satisfaction of a share price condition that the closing share price of the company’s common stock on each of the 20 trading days before and including the end of a performance period is not less than $0.20 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, combinations, recapitalization and the like). At the end of the performance period (December 31, 2016), the share price condition has not been achieved and the 1,000,000 options issued were forfeited.

Tyler D D’Amore, relative of Dr. Carr Bettis

On December 2, 2016, the Company issued 64,760 options to Mr. D’Amore, which vest 50% from January 1, 2017 through December 1, 2017; 25% from January 1, 2018 through December 1, 2018 and 25% from January 1, 2019 through December 1, 2019, have an exercise price of $0.121, and expire on December 2, 2021, for services.

Leland Bettis, relative of Dr. Carr Bettis

On December 2, 2016, the Company issued 43,125 options to Mr. Bettis, which vest 50% from January 1, 2017 through December 1, 2017; 25% from January 1, 2018 through December 1, 2018 and 25% from January 1, 2019 through December 1, 2019, have an exercise price of $0.121, and expire on December 2, 2021, for services.

68

David Moradi

As of December 31, 2015 the Company owed David Moradi $70,000 in principal and $4,280 in accrued interest. During the year ended December 31, 2016, Mr. Moradi was paid in full. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred a total of $44,912 legal expenses for services provided on corporate general matters by Anthion Management LLC, an entity affiliated with David Moradi.

Conversion of convertible notes payable

On April 18, 2016, the Company issued 2,506,849 shares of its common stock in settlement of an outstanding convertible note payable, issued in October 2015, for $200,000 and accrued interest $10,575 to KTK Capital, Inc., a material shareholder on a fully diluted basis.

On April 18, 2016, the Company issued 1,251,142 shares of its common stock in settlement of an outstanding convertible note payable, issued in October 2015, for $100,000 and accrued interest $5,096 to Equity Trust Custodian, FBO Alexandre Zynier IRA, an entity under the control of Alexandre Zynier, a member of the Company’s board of directors.

On April 18, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 18,353,310 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.175 per share with a term of five years in settlement of convertible notes payable, issued in October 2015, in aggregate of $1,475,000 and accrued interest of $66,678 to Anthion Partners and Anthion Partners II LLC; entities under common control with David Moradi.

Sales of common stock

In 2016, the Company sold to CSB IV Holdings, a company under the control of Carr Bettis, an aggregate of 2,607,143 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to acquire 292,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a term of five years, an exercise price of $0.25 per share and is subject to anti-dilution protection, as defined, for net proceeds of $365,000.

In 2016, the Company sold to Ernest Purcell, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, 1,607,137 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to acquire 180,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a term of five years, an exercise price of $0.25 per share and is subject to anti-dilution protection, as defined, for net proceeds of $225,000.

In 2016, the Company sold to Todd Bankofier, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, 178,571 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to acquire 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a term of five years, an exercise price of $0.25 per share and is subject to anti-dilution protection, as defined, for net proceeds of $25,000.

In 2016, the Company sold to Anthon Capital Management, an entity under the control of David Moradi, 892,857 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to acquire 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a term of five years, an exercise price of $0.25 per share and is subject to anti-dilution protection, as defined, for net proceeds of $125,000.

Other

The Company holds 60,000 shares in Peartrack Security Systems, formerly Ecologic Transportation, as of December 31, 2014 resulting from the conversion of a $60,000 accounts receivable balance in 2014. Peartrack Security Systems is an entity whose Executive Chairman was former Company director, Edward Withrow III. In 2014, the Company invested $50,000 in Cannonball Red in return for 97,500 shares held as of December 31, 2014. Former CEO, Chief Innovation Officer and director Nathan Bradley had a material interest in Cannonball Red at the time of the transaction. At December 31, 2016, the Company recorded an impairment of $50,000 relating to the 97,500 shares of Cannonball Red to a net carrying value of $0.

69

In summary, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the total balances of related party payables were $32,118 and $153,474 (see Note 9), respectively.

Other than employment agreements with our executive officers and other payments made to our executive officers, all as described above under the section entitled “Management - Executive Compensation,” and compensation paid to our directors as described above under the section entitled “Management - Director Compensation,” the following Directors are independent:

·Anthony Coelho

·Christine Griffin

·Ernest Purcell

·Alexandre Zyngier

 

Item 14:14.   Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 

The firminformation required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of MaloneBailey, LLP acts as our independent registered public accounting firm. The aggregate fees billed orStockholders, which proxy statement is anticipated to be billed forfiled with the most recently completed fiscal year endedSecurities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2016 and for fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our financial reports on Form S-1, Form 10-Qs in the future and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for these fiscal periods were as follows:2020.

 

  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Audit Fees $53,000  $98,647 
All Other Fees $3,000  $272,783 
Total $56,000  $371,430 

Audit and Other fees increased in 2015 due to the restatement of the 2014 first, second and third quarterly financial statements together with the amounts paid to contract a temporary CFO to compile the restatements, the 2014 10-K, and the quarterly 2015 financial statement. Multiple levels of supervision have been implemented and the firm has improved cross reconciliations of internal parties’ actions and approvals. Singular levels of approval, supervision and processing have been eliminated. All contracts are thoroughly reviewed by management and at certain levels require Board approval. The firm no longer engages in non-monetary transactions related to Intellectual Property. All transactions are representative of cash contracts in the form of Subscription and Services Agreements.

Our board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by our board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

Our board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by our independent auditors and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit, is compatible with maintaining our independent auditors’ independence.

70


PART IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

 a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:

 

 (1)Financial Statements — See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 below and the financial pages that follow.

 

 (2)Financial Statements Schedules — Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. All schedules other than those listed above are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is presented in the financial statements or related notes thereto.

 

    Additions       
Description Balance at Beginning of Period  Charged to
Costs and Expenses
  Charged
to Other
Accounts
  Deductions  Balance at
End of Period
 
(in thousands)                    
Year ended December 31, 2020:                    
Allowance for doubtful accounts $63  $128  $-  $(112) $79 
Year ended December 31, 2019:                    
Allowance for doubtful accounts $-  $13  $50  $-  $63 

All other schedules are omitted, since the required information is not applicable or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the financial statements and notes thereto.

 (3)Exhibits — The following exhibits are either filed herewith or have previously been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are referred to and incorporated herein by reference to such filings:

  

Exhibit No. Description
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of AudioEye, Inc., dated as of May 20, 2005 (1)
   
3.2 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of AudioEye, Inc., dated as of February 12, 2010 (1)
   
3.3 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of AudioEye, Inc., dated as of August 16, 2012 (2)
   
3.4 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of AudioEye, Inc. (12), dated as of March 26, 2014 (6)
   
3.5 By-lawsCertificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of AudioEye, Inc. (1), dated as of August 1, 2018 (13)
   
4.13.6 FormCertificate of Warrant (9)Designations - Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (18)
   
4.23.7 FormBy-laws of Warrant (9)AudioEye, Inc., as amended (18)
   
4.33.8 FormAmendment No. 1 to By-laws of Warrant (13)AudioEye, Inc. (20)
   
4.43.9 FormAmended and Restated By-laws as of Warrant (14)August 13, 2020 (21)
   
4.44.1 CertificateForm of Designations — Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (17)Warrant dated as of April 18, 2016 (10)
   
4.54.2 Form of Secured Convertible Promissory Note (19)
4.6Form of Warrant (19)
4.7Form of Warrant (20)
4.8Form of Omnibus Amendment to Secured Convertible Promissory Notes (20)dated as of April 18, 2016 (10)
   
4.94.3 Form of First Amendment to Common Stock Warrant (20)dated as of April 18, 2016 (10)


4.4Form of Registration Rights Agreement between AudioEye, Inc. and each Purchaser dated as of August 6, 2018 (13)
   
5.04.5 Form of Warrant (21)dated as of December 19, 2016 (11)
   
5.14.6 FormDescription of Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement (21)Registered Securities (18)
   
10.110.1** Master Agreement dated as of September 22, 2011 between CMG Holdings Group, Inc. and AudioEye Acquisition Corporation (1)
10.2Form of Services Agreement between CMG Holdings Group, Inc. and AudioEye, Inc. (1)
10.3Termination and Release Agreement dated October 24, 2011 between Maryland Technology Development Corp. and AudioEye, Inc. (3)
10.4Promissory Note dated October 24, 2011 between Maryland Technology Development Corp. and AudioEye, Inc. (4)
10.5AudioEye, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan effective December 19, 2012 (4)(3)

 71 

10.610.2** AudioEye, Inc. 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan effective August 20, 2013 (8)(4)
   
10.710.3** Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 22, 2013 between AudioEye, Inc. and AudioEye Acquisition Corporation (5)
10.8Executive Employment Agreement dated August 7, 2013 between Nathaniel Bradley and AudioEye, Inc. (7)
10.9Executive Employment Agreement dated August 7, 2013 between Sean Bradley and AudioEye, Inc. (7)
10.10Executive Employment Agreement dated August 7, 2013 between James Crawford and AudioEye, Inc. (7)
10.11Executive Employment Agreement dated August 7, 2013 between Edward O’Donnell and AudioEye, Inc. (7)
10.12Executive Employment Agreement dated August 7, 2013 between Constantine Potamianos and AudioEye, Inc. (7)
10.13Performance Share Unit Agreement dated August 7, 2013 between Nathaniel Bradley and AudioEye, Inc. (7)
10.14Performance Share Unit Agreement dated August 7, 2013 between Sean Bradley and AudioEye, Inc. (7)
10.15Performance Share Unit Agreement dated August 7, 2013 between James Crawford and AudioEye, Inc. (7)
10.16Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November 13, 2013 by and among the Company and the investors identified on the signature pages thereto (First Private Placement) (9)
10.17Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among the Company and the investors identified on the signature pages thereto (Second Private Placement) (9)
10.18Executive Employment Agreement dated January 27, 2014 between Paul Arena and AudioEye, Inc. (10)
10.19Performance Share Unit Agreement dated January 27, 2014 between Paul Arena and AudioEye, Inc. (10)
10.20AudioEye, Inc. 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan effective January 27, 2014 (11)(5)
   
10.2110.4** AudioEye, Inc. 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan effective September 5, 2014 (13)(7)
   
10.2210.5** Separation and Release Agreement dated March 5, 2015 between Paul Arena and AudioEye, Inc. (15)2016 Incentive Compensation Plan effective December 17, 2015 (14)
   
10.2310.6** Consulting Agreement dated March 5, 2015 between AIM Group, Inc. andForm of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreements for grants under the AudioEye, Inc. (15)2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 Incentive Compensation Plans (14)
   
10.2410.7** Separation and ReleaseForm of Performance Option Agreement dated March 29, 2015 between Edward O’Donnell andfor grants under the AudioEye, Inc. (16)2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 Incentive Compensation Plans (14)
   
10.2510.8** Form of Stock Option Agreement for grants under the AudioEye, Inc. 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 Incentive Compensation Plans (14)
10.9**AudioEye, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended and restated on May 18, 2020) (23)
10.10**AudioEye, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan – Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (15)
10.11**AudioEye, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan – Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (15)
10.12**AudioEye, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan – Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (15)
10.13**AudioEye, Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (25)
10.14**Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Time-Based) under the AudioEye, Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (25)  


10.15**Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Non-Employee Director Awards) under the AudioEye, Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (25)
10.16**Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement (Performance-Based) under the AudioEye, Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (25)
10.17**Form of Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement under the AudioEye, Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (25)
10.18**Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement under the AudioEye, Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (25)
10.19**Form of Other Stock-Based Award Agreement under the AudioEye, Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (25)
10.20**Executive Employment Agreement dated July 1,20151, 2015 between Dr. Carr Bettis and AudioEye, Inc. (18)(8)
   
10.2610.21** Executive Employment Agreement dated May 10, 2019 between Sachin Barot and AudioEye, Inc. (15)
10.22**Executive Employment Agreement dated February 25, 2020 between Heath Thompson and AudioEye, Inc. (19)
10.23**Executive Employment Agreement dated August 13, 2020 between Dominic Varacalli and AudioEye, Inc. (24)
10.24**Employment Agreement dated August 20, 2020 between David Moradi and AudioEye, Inc. (22)
10.25**Notice of Award of Performance Shares to David Moradi dated August 20, 2020 under the AudioEye, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (22)
10.26Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated October 9, 2015 between investors and AudioEye, Inc. (19)(9)


10.27 
10.27Security Agreement dated October 9, 2015 between investors and AudioEye, Inc. (19)
10.28Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated April 18, 2016 between investors and AudioEye, Inc. (20)
10.29First Amendment to Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated April 18, 2016 between investors and AudioEye, Inc. (20)(10)
   
14.110.28 Code of Ethics (6)Second Amendment to Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated October 11, 2017 between investors and AudioEye. Inc (12)
   
21.1*10.29 SubsidiariesCommon Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated April 18, 2016 between investors and AudioEye, Inc. (10)
10.30Form of Common Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated as of December 19, 2016 (11)
10.31Form of Securities Purchase Agreement by and between AudioEye, Inc. and each Purchaser dated August 6, 2018 (13)
10.32Schedule of Certain Parties to Securities Purchase Agreements and Registration Rights Agreements dated as of August 6, 2018 (14)
10.33**Form of Omnibus Amendment to Common Stock Warrants dated as of August 14, 2019 (16)
10.34Letter Agreement dated as of August 14, 2019 between the Company and Sero Capital LLC (16)
10.35Loan Agreement dated as of August 14, 2019 between the Company and Sero Capital LLC (16)
10.36**Form of AudioEye, Inc. Indemnification Agreement (Directors and Executive Officers) (17)

 72 

31.1*10.37 Severance Agreement and General Release of Claims dated January 17, 2020 between the Company and Todd Bankofier (18)
10.38*Note Agreement dated April 15, 2020 between Liberty Capital Bank and AudioEye, Inc.
14.1Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (14)
23.1*Consent of MaloneBailey LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
24.1*Power of Attorney (included in signature page)
31.1*Certification of the ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
31.2* Certification of the ChiefPrincipal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


32.1# 
32.1*Certification of the ChiefPrincipal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
32.2*32.2# Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1Resolutions adopted by the Board setting forth the information with respect to the Ratification required under Section 204 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (18)
   
101.INS* XBRL Instance Document
   
101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
   
101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
   
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
   
101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
   
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*Filed herewith.
**Constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
#Furnished herewith.

 

(1)(1)Incorporated by reference to Form S-1, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on October 21, 2011.2011 (File No. 333-177463).

 
(2)Incorporated by reference to Form S-1/A, filed with the SEC on October 1, 2012.2012 (File No. 333-177463).

 
(3)Incorporated by reference to Form S-1/A, filed with the SEC on February 10, 2012.

(4)Incorporated by reference to Form S-1/A, filed with the SEC on January 11, 2013.2013 (File No. 333-177463).

 (5)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 27, 2013.

 
(6)(4)Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013.

(7)Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 9, 2013.

(8)Incorporated by reference to Form S-8, filed with the SEC on August 28, 2013.2013 (File No. 333-177463).

 (9)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 26, 2013.

 
(10)(5)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 30, 2014.

(11)Incorporated by reference to Form S-1/A, filed with the SEC on February 4, 2014.2014 (File No. 333-177463).

 (12)
(6)Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014.

 (13)
(7)Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 7, 2014.

 (14)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 7, 2015.

73 

(8)(15)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 6, 2015.

(16)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 1, 2015.

(17)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 7, 2015.

(18)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 8, 20152015.

 (19)
(9)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 16, 20152015.

 (20)
(10)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 19, 20162016.

 (21)
(11)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 22, 20162016.
(12)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 16, 2017.
(13)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 7, 2018.
(14)Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 27, 2019.
(15)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 14, 2019.

 


(16)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 16, 2019.
 74
(17)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 16, 2019.
(18)Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 30, 2020.
(19)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 2, 2020.
(20)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2020.
(21)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 24, 2020.
(22)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 24, 2020.
(23)Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 13, 2020.
(24)Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 13, 2020.
 (25)Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 10, 2020.
 

 

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.


SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Section 13 or 15 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the 30th11th day of March, 2017.2021.

 

 AUDIOEYE, INC.
   
 By:/s/ Dr. Carr BettisDavid Moradi
  Dr. Carr BettisDavid Moradi
  Principal Executive Officer
   
 By:/s/ Todd BankofierSachin Barot
  Todd BankofierSachin Barot
  Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer

 

In accordancePOWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Dr. Carr Bettis, David Moradi and Sachin Barot, or either of them, his attorney-in-fact, with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature Title Date
     
/s/ Dr. Carr BettisDavid Moradi Interim Chief Executive Chairman/Chairman of the Board andOfficer, Chief Strategy Officer, Director 

March 30, 201711, 2021

Dr. Carr BettisDavid Moradi (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/ Todd BankofierSachin Barot Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer 

March 30, 201711, 2021

Todd BankofierSachin Barot (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  
     
/s/ Sean BradleyDr. Carr Bettis President, Chief Technology Officer, President, and SecretaryExecutive Chairman, Director 

March 30, 201711, 2021

Sean BradleyDr. Carr Bettis    
     
/s/ Anthony Coelho Director 

March 30, 201711, 2021

Anthony Coelho    
     
/s/ Christine GriffinJamil Tahir Director 

March 30, 201711, 2021

Christine GriffinJamil Tahir    
     
/s/ Ernest PurcellMarc Lehmann Director 

March 30, 201711, 2021

Ernest Purcell
/s/ Alexandre ZyngierDirectorMarch 30, 2017
Alexandre ZyngierMarc Lehmann    

 

75

 

ITEM 8 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

AUDIOEYE, INC.

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20162020 and 20152019F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Endedyears ended December 31, 20162020 and 20152019F-4
Consolidated StatementStatements of Stockholders’ Equity for the two Years Endedyears ended December 31, 20162020F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Endedyears ended December 31, 20162020 and 20152019F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7

 

F-1


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors and Stockholdersof

AudioEye, Inc.

Tucson, Arizona

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AudioEye, Inc. and its subsidiary (collectively, the(the “Company”) as of December 31, 20162020 and 20152019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements areended, and the responsibility ofrelated notes (collectively referred to as the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)“financial statements”). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of AudioEye, Inc. and its subsidiarythe Company as of December 31, 20162020 and 20152019 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The accompanyingBasis for Opinion

These financial statements have been prepared assuming thatare the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company will continuein accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a going concern. As described in Note 2,whole, and we are not, by communicating the Company hascritical audit matter below, providing a working capital deficit and has incurred losses from operations and net cash used in operating activities since inception. These factors raise substantial doubt aboutseparate opinion on the Company’s abilitycritical audit matters or on the account or disclosure to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to this mater are described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.which it relates.

Assessment of capitalized technology costs incurred on software development projects
Description of the MatterAs discussed in Notes 3 and 4 to the financial statements, the Company’s capitalized technology includes direct third party costs, and internal payroll and payroll-related costs used in the creation of internal-use software. The Company’s capitalized technology costs, net of accumulated amortization, was $1.4 million as of December 31, 2020. The Company invested $1.0 million in additions to amortizable intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2020, a portion of which related to internal-use software development projects.

We identified the assessment of capitalized technology costs incurred on software development projects as a critical audit matter. Specifically, assessing if the costs incurred on the software development project have met the capitalization criteria required a higher degree of auditor judgment. This included applying procedures to determine that the costs related to a project that had entered the application development stage, resulted in additional functionality, and for which it was probable that the project would be completed and used to perform the function intended. Evaluating these criteria required the assessment of the technical aspects of each individual project to which the capitalized costs are related.

How We Addressed the

Matter in Our Audit

For certain software development projects, we inspected the Company’s documentation  to evaluate whether the costs were capitalizable under the applicable accounting standards and tested selected capitalized costs. For those projects, we evaluated the Company’s documentation through direct inquiry with Company personnel responsible for overseeing and leading the software development activities.

 

/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP

www.malonebailey.com

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2011.

Houston, Texas

March 30, 201710, 2021

 

F-2


AUDIOEYE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 20162020 AND 20152019

 

 2016  2015  December 31, December 31, 
(in thousands, except per share data) 2020 2019 
ASSETS                
Current assets:                
Cash $1,409,418  $1,687,257  $9,095  $1,972 
Accounts receivable, net  44,645   22,741 
Marketable securities, held in related party  1,200   3,600 
Non-marketable securities, held in related party  -   50,000 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $79 and $63, respectively  5,096   2,958 
Unbilled receivables  -   160 
Deferred costs, short term  152   183 
Debt issuance costs, net  -   137 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  19,560   41,388   288   198 
Total current assets  1,474,823   1,804,986   14,631   5,608 
                
Intangible assets, net  2,313,249   2,840,856 
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $209 and $124, respectively  91   156 
Right of use assets  617   827 
Deferred costs, long term  77   145 
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $4,328 and $3,710, respectively  2,137   1,715 
Goodwill  700,528   700,528   701   701 
        
Total assets $4,488,600  $5,346,370  $18,254  $9,152 
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY                
Current liabilities:                
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $245,677  $213,620  $2,190  $973 
Notes and loans payable, current  23,800   24,000 
Related party payables  32,118   153,474 
Derivative liabilities  3,478,626   439,361 
Deferred rent  207   - 
Finance lease liabilities  49   52 
Operating lease liabilities  229   209 
Warrant liability  -   120 
Deferred revenue  386,485   60,790   6,328   5,372 
Term loan, short term  219   - 
Total current liabilities  4,166,913   891,245   9,015   6,726 
                
Long term liabilities:                
Deferred rent  14,450   - 
Convertible notes,-related party net  -   1,365,684 
Convertible notes and loans payable, net  -   557,815 
        
Finance lease liabilities  12   52 
Operating lease liabilities  427   655 
Deferred revenue  83   153 
Term loan, long term  1,083   - 
Total liabilities  4,181,363   2,814,744   10,620   7,586 
                
Commitments and contingencies  -   - 
        
Stockholders' equity:                
Preferred stock, $0.00001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 160,000 and 175,000 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively  2   2 
Common stock, $0.00001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 111,512,001 and 81,717,154 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively  1,115   817 
Additional paid in capital  34,124,181   26,770,238 
Preferred stock, $0.00001 par value, 10,000 shares authorized        
Series A Convertible Preferred stock, $0.00001 par value, 200 shares authorized, 90 and 105 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively  1   1 
Common stock, $0.00001 par value, 50,000 shares authorized, 10,130 and 8,877 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively  1   1 
Additional paid-in capital  64,716   51,490 
Accumulated deficit  (33,818,061)  (24,239,431)  (57,084)  (49,926)
Total stockholders' equity  307,237   2,531,626   7,634   1,566 
                
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $4,488,600  $5,346,370  $18,254  $9,152 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-3


AUDIOEYE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2016  2015 
Revenues $994,265  $338,863 
(in thousands, except per share data) 2020 2019 
Revenue $20,475  $10,765 
                
Cost of revenue  1,226,321   1,224,652   5,961   4,406 
                
Gross Loss  (232,056)  (885,789)
Gross profit  14,514   6,359 
                
Operating expenses:                
Selling and marketing  713,972   884,440   8,472   5,708 
Research and development  343,712   375,817   1,230   636 
General and administrative  2,568,227   4,633,702   11,945   7,833 
Impairment of related party non-marketable securities  50,000   - 
Amortization and depreciation  570,247   534,220 
Total operating expenses  4,246,158   6,428,179   21,647   14,177 
                
Operating loss  (4,478,214)  (7,313,968)  (7,133)  (7,818)
                
Other income (expense):                
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative liabilities  (2,758,488)  187,932 
Unrealized loss on marketable securities  (2,400)  (10,200)
Loss on settlement of debt  (1,664,281)  - 
Other income  750   3,814   -   12 
Change in fair value of warrant liability  120   99 
Interest expense  (675,997)  (76,723)  (145)  (76)
Total other income (expense)  (5,100,416)  104,823   (25)  35 
                
Net loss  (9,578,630)  (7,209,145)  (7,158)  (7,783)
                
Deemed dividend on Series A Convertible preferred stock  -   (594,641)
Dividend on Series A Convertible preferred stock  (80,000)  (58,733)
Dividends on Series A Convertible Preferred Stock  (51)  (52)
                
Net loss available to common stockholders $(9,658,630) $(7,862,519) $(7,209) $(7,835)
                
Net loss per common share-basic and diluted $(0.10) $(0.10) $(0.77) $(0.97)
                
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic and diluted  98,905,556   80,445,509   9,313   8,107 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-4


AUDIOEYE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20162020

 

              Additional       
  Common stock  Preferred stock  Paid in  Accumulated    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Total 
Balance, December 31, 2014  77,817,861  $778   -  $-  $22,893,463  $(17,030,286) $5,863,955 
Preferred stock issued for cash  -   -   175,000   2   1,749,998   -   1,750,000 
Common stock issued for cash and subscription receivables, net  812,500   8   -   -   324,992   -   325,000 
Common stock issued for exercise of warrants  109,855   1   -   -   43,940   -   43,941 
Common stock issued for services  3,101,936   31   -   -   682,095   -   682,126 
Warrants issued for cancellation of common stock  (124,998)  (1)  -   -   1   -   - 
Warrants, Options, PSU issued for services  -   -   -   -   1,075,749   -   1,075,749 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (7,209,145)  (7,209,145)
Balance, December 31, 2015  81,717,154  $817   175,000  $2  $26,770,238  $(24,239,431) $2,531,626 
Common stock issued for services  416,664   5   -   -   63,287   -   63,292 
Common stock issued in settlement of convertible notes and accrued interest  12,834,800   128   -   -   1,077,995   -   1,078,123 
Common stock issued for cash, net of placement costs of $60,918  15,642,858   156   -   -   2,128,926   -   2,129,082 
Common stock issued upon conversion of preferred stock  900,525   9   (15,000)  -   (9)  -   - 
Fair value of warrants issued in settlement of convertible debt and accrued interest  -   -   -   -   3,205,959   -   3,205,959 
Reclassify fair value of liability warrants issued in connection with sale of common stock  -   -   -   -   (280,777)  -   (280,777)
Warrants and Options issued for services  -   -   -   -   1,085,645   -   1,085,645 
Restricted stock units issued in payment of accrued compensation  -   -   -   -   72,917   -   72,917 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (9,578,630)  (9,578,630)
Balance, December 31, 2016  111,512,001  $1,115   160,000  $2  $34,124,181  $(33,818,061) $307,237 
              Additional       
  Common stock  Preferred stock  Paid-in  Accumulated    
(in thousands) Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Total 
Balance, December 31, 2018  7,580  $1   105  $1  $48,017  $(42,143) $5,876 
Common stock issued in exchange for exercise of options and warrants  1,297   -   -   -   2,257   -   2,257 
Stock-based compensation  -   -   -   -   1,216   -   1,216 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (7,783)  (7,783)
Balance, December 31, 2019  8,877  $1  105  $1  $51,490  $(49,926) $1,566 
Common stock issued upon exercise of warrants and options on a cashless basis  267   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Common stock issued upon exercise of warrants and options on a cash basis  353   -   -   -   1,264   -   1,264 
Common stock issued upon settlement of restricted stock units  117   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Common stock issued upon conversion of preferred stock  43   -   (15)  -   -   -   - 
Issuance of common stock for cash, net of transaction expenses  473   -   -   -   7,824   -   7,824 
Stock-based compensation  -   -   -   -   4,138   -   4,138 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (7,158)  (7,158)
Balance, December 31, 2020  10,130  $1   90  $1  $64,716  $(57,084) $7,634 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-5


AUDIOEYE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

  Year ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net (loss) $(9,578,630) $(7,209,145)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  570,247   534,220 
Amortization of debt discounts  600,301   26,992 
Option, warrant, RSU and PSU expense  1,085,645   1,075,749 
Stock issued or issuable for services  63,292   682,126 
Unrealized loss on marketable securities  2,400   10,200 
Impairment loss on non-marketable securities  50,000   - 
(Loss) gain on change in derivative liabilities  2,758,488   (187,932)
Loss on settlement of debt  1,664,281   - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (21,904)  238,935 
Related party receivable  -   10,000 
Other current assets  21,828   49,300 
Accounts payable and accruals  151,858   (566,272)
Billing in excess of costs  -   (123,908)
Deferred rent  14,657   - 
Deferred revenue  325,695   60,790 
Related party payables  (48,439)  (75,509)
Net cash (used in) operating activities  (2,340,281)  (5,474,454)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Cash (paid for) intellectual property  (42,640)  (43,689)
Software development costs  -   (233,442)
Net cash (used in) investing activities  (42,640)  (277,131)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Issuance of common stock and warrants for cash  2,129,082   325,000 
Collection of stock subscription receivable  -   1,175,000 
Issuance of preferred stock for cash  -   1,750,000 
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt of which $1,775,000 related party  -   2,500,000 
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants  -   43,941 
Repayments of notes payable  (24,000)  (28,000)
Net cash provided by financing activities  2,105,082   5,765,941 
         
Net (decrease) increase in cash  (277,839)  14,356 
Cash-beginning of period  1,687,257   1,672,901 
Cash-end of period $1,409,418  $1,687,257 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION        
Interest paid  -  $4,567 
Income taxes paid  -  $- 
         
Non cash investing and financing activities:        
Debt discount for warrants issued with debt  -  $627,293 
Warrant issued for cancellation of common stock  -  $1 
Deemed dividend beneficial conversion feature on convertible preferred stock  -  $594,641 
Common stock issued in settlement of convertible notes payable and accrued interest $1,078,123   - 
Fair value of warrants issued in settlement of convertible notes payable and accrued interest $3,205,959   - 
Reclassify fair value of liability warrants from equity to liability upon issuance $280,777   - 
Restricted stock units issued in payment of accrued compensation $72,917     
Common stock issued upon conversion of preferred stock $9     
  Year ended December 31, 
(in thousands) 2020  2019 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net loss $(7,158) $(7,783)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  963   723 
Stock-based compensation expense  4,138   1,216 
Amortization of deferred commissions  250   240 
Amortization of debt issuance costs  137   82 
Amortization of right of use assets  210   214 
Change in fair value of warrant liability  (120)  (99)
Provision for accounts receivable  128   13 
Accounts receivable and unbilled receivables  (2,106)  (2,959)
Prepaid expenses and other assets  (241)  (447)
Accounts payable and accruals  1,215   879 
Operating lease liability  (208)  (179)
Related party payables  -   (14)
Deferred revenue  886   2,497 
Net cash used in operating activities  (1,906)  (5,617)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Purchase of equipment  -   (56)
Software development costs  (1,157)  (307)
Patent costs  (141)  - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,298)  (363)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from common stock offering, net of transaction costs  7,824   - 
Proceeds from term loan  1,302   - 
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants  1,264   2,257 
Repayments of finance leases  (63)  (47)
Net cash provided by financing activities  10,327   2,210 
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  7,123   (3,770)
Cash and cash equivalents-beginning of period  1,972   5,742 
Cash and cash equivalents-end of period $9,095  $1,972 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES        
Interest paid $6  $6 
Income taxes paid  -   - 
         
Non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Right-of-use assets and operating lease obligations recognized upon adoption of ASU 2016-02 $-  $568 
Right-of-use assets and operating lease obligations recognized during the year  -   484 
Debt issuance costs originated from issuance of warrant in connection with credit facility  -   219 
Equipment acquired from finance leases  20   61 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-6


 

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 20162020 AND 20152019

 

NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

 

AudioEye, Inc. (the(“we”, “us”, “our”, “AudioEye” or the “Company”) was incorporated on May 20, 2005operates in the stateone segment as a provider of Delaware. On March 31, 2010, the Company was acquired by CMG Holdings Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“CMG”). Effective August 17, 2012, AudioEye Acquisition Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“AEAC”), acquired 80% of the Company’s then-outstanding common stock from CMG.

The Company has developed patented, Internet content publication and distribution software and related services that enables conversion of any mediadigital content into accessible formats and allows for real time distribution to end users on any Internet connected device. The Company’s focus is to create more comprehensive access to Internet, print, broadcast and other media to all people regardless of their network connection, device, location, or disabilities.

 

The Company is focused on developing innovations in the field of networked and device embedded audio technology. The Company owns a unique patent portfolio comprised of six issued patents in the United States, a notice of allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for a seventh patent, and two U.S. patents pending with additional patents being drafted for filing with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and internationally.

On August 17, 2012, AEAC acquired 80% of the Company from CMG. Pursuant to the agreement:

1.CMG would retain 15% of the Company.

2.CMG would distribute to its stockholders, in the form of a dividend, 5% of the capital stock of the Company.

3.The Company entered into a Royalty Agreement with CMG to pay to CMG 10% of cash received from income earned, settlements or judgments directly resulting from the Company’s patent enforcement and licensing strategy whether received by the Company or any of its affiliates, net of any direct costs or tax implications incurred in pursuit of such strategy pertaining to the patents.

4.The Company entered into a Services Agreement with CMG whereby CMG will receive a commission of not less than 7.5% of all revenues received by the Company after the closing date from all business, clients, or other sources of revenue procured by CMG or its employees, officers or subsidiaries, and directed to the Company, and 10% of net revenues obtained from a third party described in the agreement.

On March 22, 2013, the Company and AEAC entered into the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each share of AEACOur common stock issued and outstanding immediately prioris listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “AEYE” since September 4, 2018. Prior to the Merger effective date would be converted into .94134 share of the Company’sSeptember 4, 2018, our common stock was listed on the OTCQB and the outstanding convertible debentures of AEAC (the “AEAC Debentures”) inOTC Bulletin Board since April 15, 2013 under the aggregate principal amount of $1,400,200, together with accrued interest thereon of $67,732, would be assumed by the Company and then exchanged for convertible debentures of the Company (the “AE Debentures”). Effective March 25, 2013, the Merger was completed. In connection with the Merger, the stockholders of AEAC received on a pro rata basis the 24,004,143 shares of the Company’s common stock that were held by AEAC, and the former holders of the AEAC Debentures received an aggregate of 5,871,752 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to their conversion of all of the AE Debentures issued to replace the AEAC Debentures.

On November 12, 2013, the Company and CMG terminated the Royalty Agreement.

On December 30, 2013, the Company completed the repurchase of 2,184,583 shares of its common stock owned by CMG which shares were transferred to the Company in January, 2014 and retired to treasury. In connection, with the repurchase, the Company paid CMG $573,022 and forgave a $50,000 payable from an affiliate of CMG.

F-7

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015same symbol.

 

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN— CAPITAL RAISE AND MANAGEMENT’S LIQUIDITY PLANS

In the third quarter of 2020, we completed a public offering of common stock, whereby we issued 473,239 shares of our common stock at $17.75 per share, and raised a total of $7,824,000, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and other costs associated with the offering.

 

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had2020, cash of $1,409,418 and a working capital deficit of $2,692,090, principally due to the inclusion of non-cash derivative liability recorded in current liabilities. Excluding the derivative liability, the Company’s working capital would have been $786,536. In addition, the Company used actual net cash in operations of $2,340,281 duringtotaled $9,095,000 and $5,616,000, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company has2020, cash used in operating activities totaled $1,906,000.

We have incurred net losses since inception. These conditions raiseOur independent registered public accounting firm expressed in its report on our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 that there was substantial doubt about the Company’sour ability to continue as a going concern.

In 2016, Following the Company sold sharescapital raise during the third quarter of common stock2020, which contributed to the improvement in our cash and warrants for net proceeds, after commissions and other costs,working capital positions as of $2,129,082. It is anticipatedDecember 31, 2020, we believe that the proceeds from the sale of its common stock and warrants will provide the Company with cash sufficientsubstantial doubt about our ability to fund operations through July 2017.

The Company expects that cash used in operations will decrease significantly over the next several years as the Company executes its business plan. In the event that the Company is not able to fully achieve its plan, the Company may need to raise additional funds through equity or debt financing. If the Company is unsuccessful in raising additional financing, it will need to reduce costs and operations in the future.

Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which contemplates continuation of the Companycontinue as a going concern has been alleviated and that we have sufficient liquidity to continue as a going concern through the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities innext twelve months after the normal course of business. The carrying amounts of assets and liabilities presented indate that the financial statements do not necessarily purportare issued. Refer to represent realizable or settlement values. The financial statements do not include any adjustment that might resultNote 12 – Subsequent Events for information regarding additional capital raised from the outcome of this uncertainty.a common stock offering after December 31, 2020.

 

NOTE 3 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of Presentation

 

This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements. The Company has a fiscal year ending on December 31. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period classification.

 

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidatedAll amounts in the financial statements, include the accounts of the Companynotes and its wholly owned subsidiary, Empire Technologies, LLC (“Empire”). All significant inter-company accounts and transactionstables have been eliminated.

Duringrounded to the years ended December 31, 2016nearest thousand dollars, except share and 2015, Empire had no activity. Empire had no assets or liabilities as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

The Company acquired 19.5 % of Couponicate for a nominal cost in the year ended December 31, 2012. The entity has no assets or liabilities and has no net income or loss.

Capitalization of Software Development Costs

The Company expenses development costs for research and development until such time as the software became technologically feasible. The Company’s software became technologically feasible at the end of 2013. The software development was substantially completed by the end of August, 2014. The Company further determined that the life of the capitalized software development costs is three years. Further enhancements and Patentable improvements were developed in 2015 and are ongoing. New patents have been filed and are pending as discussed more fully in the Business Description.

F-8

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when all applicable recognition criteria have been met, which generally include (a) persuasive evidence of an existing arrangement; (b) fixed or determinable price; (c) delivery has occurred or service has been rendered; and (d) collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured. For software and technology development contracts the Company recognizes revenues on a percentage of completion method based upon several factors including but not limited to (a) estimate of total hours and milestones to complete; (b) total hours completed; (c) delivery of services rendered; (d) change in estimates; and (e) collectability of the contract.

The Company had two major customers including their affiliates which generated approximately 45.3% (23.8% and 21.5%) and 67.5% (56.3% and 11.2%) of its revenue in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

At December 31, 2016, the Company had two customers representing 29% and 18% of the outstanding accounts receivable.per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilitiesthe related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significantperiod. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates include the fair value of the Company’s stock,and judgments, including those related to stock-based compensation, fair values relating to derivative liabilities, debt discountscapitalization of software development costs, allowance for doubtful accounts, and the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets.impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 


AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Research and Technology ExpensesRevenue Recognition

 

ResearchWe derive our revenue primarily from the sale of internally-developed software by a software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) delivery model, as well as from professional services, through our direct sales force or through third-party resellers. Our SaaS fees include support and technology expensesmaintenance.

We recognize revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). The core principle of ASC 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

We determine revenue recognition through the following five steps:

·Identify the contract with the customer;

·Identify the performance obligations in the contract;

·Determine the transaction price;

·Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and

·Recognize revenue when, or as, the performance obligations are satisfied.

Performance obligations are expensedthe unit of accounting for revenue recognition and generally represent the distinct goods or services that are promised to the customer. If we determine that we have not satisfied a performance obligation, we will defer recognition of the revenue until the performance obligation is deemed to be satisfied. SaaS agreements are generally non-cancelable, although clients typically have the right to terminate their contracts for cause if we fail to perform material obligations.

We may execute more than one contract with a single customer. We evaluate whether the agreements were negotiated as a package with a single objective, whether the amount of consideration to be paid in one agreement depends on the price and/or performance of another agreement, or whether the goods or services promised in the period costsagreements represent a single performance obligation. The conclusions reached can impact the allocation of the transaction price to each performance obligation and the timing of revenue recognition related to those arrangements.

Our SaaS (also referred to as “subscription”) revenue is comprised of fixed subscription fees from customer accounts on our platform. SaaS revenue is recognized on a ratable basis over the contractual subscription term of the arrangement beginning on the date that our service is made available to the customer. Certain SaaS fees are incurred. Forinvoiced in advance on an annual, semi-annual, or quarterly basis. Any funds received for services not provided yet are held in deferred revenue and are recorded as revenue when the related performance obligations have been satisfied.

Non-subscription revenue consists of PDF remediation and Mobile App report services and is recognized upon delivery. Consideration payable under these arrangements is based on usage.

The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by sales channel:

  Year ended December 31, 
(in thousands) 2020  2019 
Enterprise $10,735  $7,252 
Partner and Marketplace  9,740   3,513 
Total revenues $20,475  $10,765 


AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

The Company records accounts receivable for amounts invoiced to customers for which the Company has an unconditional right to consideration as provided under the contractual arrangement. Unbilled receivables include amounts related to the Company’s contractual right to consideration for completed performance obligations not yet invoiced. Deferred revenue includes payments received in advance of performance under the contract. Our unbilled receivables and deferred revenue are reported on an individual contract basis at the end of each reporting period. Unbilled receivables are classified as current or noncurrent based on the timing of when we expect to bill the customer. Deferred revenue is classified as current or noncurrent based on the timing of when we expect to recognize revenue.

The table below summarizes our deferred revenue as of December 31, 2020 and 2019:

  As of December 31, 
(in thousands) 2020  2019 
Deferred revenue - current $6,328  $5,372 
Deferred revenue - noncurrent  83   153 
Total deferred revenue $6,411  $5,525 

In the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, research and technology expenses totaled $343,712 and $375,817 respectively.

Billings2020 we recognized $5,269,000, or 95%, in Excess of Revenues

Revenue is recognized as a portion of the contract term as services are delivered, andrevenue from deferred revenue is recorded, only upon the receipt of cash. Timing and accounts affected by the respective journal entry are triggered when payment is received and applied to invoices in accounts receivable. There were no long-term contracts in processoutstanding as of December 31, 20162019.

We had one major customer (including the customer’s affiliates reflecting multiple contracts and 2015.a partnership with the Company) which accounted for approximately 16.7% of our revenue in the year ended December 31, 2020, and one major customer which generated approximately 10% of our revenue in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

Three customers with long standing relationships with the Company represented 25%, 13% and 13%, respectively, of total accounts receivable as of December 31, 2020. At December 31, 2019, one customer represented 40% of the outstanding accounts receivable.

 

ReclassificationDeferred Costs (Contract acquisition costs)

 

Certain reclassificationsOur sales commission plans may provide for multiple commission payments, including an initial payment in the period a customer contract is obtained, or the first invoice is paid, and deferred payments over the life of the contract as future payments are collected from the customers.

We capitalize initial and renewal sales commission payments in the period the commission is earned, which generally occurs when a customer contract is obtained or when the customer is billed, and amortize deferred commission costs on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefit, which we have deemed to be the contract term, except when the commission payment is expected to provide economic benefit for a period longer than the contract term, such as for new customer or incremental sales where renewals are expected, and renewal commissions are not commensurate with initial commissions. As a practical expedient, we expense sales commissions as incurred when the amortization period of related deferred commission costs would have been made to prior periods’ data to conform to the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported incomeone year or losses.

Fiscal Year Endless.

 

The Company has a fiscal year endingtable below summarizes the deferred commission costs as of December 31, 2020 and 2019:

  As of December 31, 
(in thousands) 2020  2019 
Deferred costs - current $152  $183 
Deferred costs - noncurrent  77   145 
Total deferred costs $229  $328 

Amortization expense associated with sales commissions was included in selling and marketing expenses on the statements of operations and totaled $250,000 and $240,000 for the years ended December 31.31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. There were no impairment losses for these capitalized costs for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue consists primarily of employee-related costs, including payroll, benefits and stock-based compensation expense for our technology operations and customer experience teams, fees paid to our managed hosting providers and other third-party service providers, amortization of capitalized software development costs and acquired technology, and allocated overhead costs.


AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers cash in savings accounts to be cash equivalents. The Company considers any short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less as cash and cash equivalents.

F-9

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Marketable Securities

The Company has elected the fair value option under ASC 825 for its marketable securities. Marketable securities are classified as available for sale and consist of common stock holdings of publicly traded companies. These securities are marked to market at the end of each reporting period based on the closing price of the security at each balance sheet date. Changes in fair value are recorded as unrealized gains or losses in the consolidated statement of operations in accordance with ASC 320.

Non-marketable Securities

From time to time, the Company invests in the securities of other entities where there exists no active market for the securities held. Non-marketable securities are recorded at the cost of the investment.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

The Company establishes anadjusts accounts receivable down to net realizable value with its allowance methodology. In determining the allowance for bad debts through a review of several factors includingdoubtful accounts for estimated losses, aged receivables are analyzed periodically by management. Each identified receivable is reviewed based upon historical collection experience, current aging status of the customer accounts, and financial condition of the Company’s customers.client and the status of any open or unresolved issues with the client preventing the payment thereof. Corrective action, if necessary, is taken by the Company to resolve open issues related to unpaid receivables. The Company does not generally require collateral for its accounts receivable. There was an allowance for doubtful accounts of $-0- as ofwas $79,000 and $63,000 at December 31, 20162020 and 2015. 2019, respectively. The Company believes that its reserve is adequate, however results may differ in future periods. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, bad debt expense totaled $128,000 and $13,000, respectively.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment includes office and computer equipment, as well as furniture and fixtures. Property and equipment are carried at the cost of acquisition, or construction and depreciated using the straight-line method over thetheir estimated useful lives, of the assets.which typically is 3 years. Costs associated with repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Costs associated with improvements which extend the life, increase the capacity or improve the efficiency of the Company’s property and equipment are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining life of the related asset. Gains andAny gain or losses on dispositionsdisposition of property and equipment is included in the results of operations in the year of disposal.

Total property and equipment acquired by cash and through finance leases totaled zero and $20,000, respectively, in the year ended December 31, 2020, and $56,000 and $61,000, respectively, in the year ended December 31, 2019. Depreciation expense was $86,000 and $69,000 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Capitalized Software Development Costs

In accordance with ASC 350-40, the Company capitalizes certain computer software and software development costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining computer software for internal use when both the preliminary project stage is completed, and it is probable that the software will be used as intended. Capitalized software costs include (i) external direct costs of materials and services utilized in developing or obtaining computer software, and (ii) compensation and related benefits for employees who are reflecteddirectly associated with the software project.

Capitalized software costs are included in operations. Depreciation is provided using theintangible assets on our balance sheet and amortized on a straight-line methodbasis when placed into service over the estimated useful lives of the software, which is typically three years. Amortization expense is included in cost of revenue on the statements of operations and totaled $449,000 and $279,000 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company reviews the carrying value for impairment whenever facts and circumstances exist that would suggest that assets might be impaired or that the useful lives should be modified. Refer to Note 4 – Intangible Assets for additional information regarding our Capitalized Software Development Costs.

Patents

We capitalize patent application costs, including registration, documentation, and other legal fees associated with the application, which are incurred through the months the patent application is filed. Costs associated with provisional application filings are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred to renew or extend the term of recognized intangible assets, including patent annuities and fees, and costs incurred in prosecuting alleged infringements of our patents are expensed as incurred. Patents are included in intangible assets on our balance sheet.


AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

We amortize capitalized patent costs on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which generally ranges from 5 to 7 years.10 years, beginning with the date the patents are issued. We evaluate the capitalized costs for impairment and write off the carrying value of abandoned patents or patent applications. We also write off capitalized costs associated to patents not granted. Refer to Note 4 – Intangible Assets for additional information regarding our patents.

 

Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets

 

Goodwill is carried at cost and is not amortized. The Company tests goodwilltested for impairment on an annual basis at least annually, and more frequently upon the endoccurrence of each fiscal year, relying on a number of factors including operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data. Company management uses its judgment in assessing whether goodwill has become impaired between annual impairment tests according to specifications set forth in ASC 350. The Company completed an evaluationcertain events that may indicate that the carrying value of goodwill at December 31, 2016 and 2015 and determinedmay not be recoverable. Events or circumstances that there was no impairment.

The fair valuecould trigger an impairment test include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in the business climate or in legal factors, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, a loss of the Company’s reporting unit is dependent upon the Company’s estimate of future cash flows and other factors. The Company’s estimates of future cash flows include assumptions concerning future operating performance and economic conditions and may differ from actual future cash flows. Estimated future cash flows are adjusted by an appropriate discount rate derived from the Company’s market capitalization plus a suitable control premium at date of the evaluation.

The financial and credit market volatility directly impacts the Company’s fair value measurement through the Company’s weighted average cost of capital that the Company uses to determine its discount rate and through the Company’s stock price that the Company uses to determine its market capitalization. Therefore,key personnel, significant changes in the stock price may also affectstrategy for our overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends, significant underperformance relative to operating performance indicators, a significant decline in market capitalization and significant changes in competition. We complete our annual impairment test during the amountfourth quarter of impairment recorded. each year, at the reporting unit level, which is at the company level as a whole, since we operate in one single reporting segment.

 

F-10

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

The Company recognizes an acquired intangible asset apart from goodwill whenever the intangible asset arises from contractual or other legal rights, or when it can be separated or divided from the acquired entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged, either individually or in combinationIntangible assets with a related contract, asset or liability. Such intangiblesfinite life are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Impairment losses are recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible asset subject to amortization is not recoverable from expected future cash flows and its carrying amount exceeds its fair value.

 

The Company reviews itsWe evaluate the need for an impairment charge relating to long-lived assets including property and equipment, identifiable intangibles, and goodwill annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assetsan asset may not be fully recoverable. To determine recoverabilityWe consider the following to be some examples of its long-lived assets, the Company evaluates the probabilityindicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) actual undiscounted cash flows significantly below historical or projected future undiscounted net cash flows will be less thanfor the carrying amountassociated assets; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of the assets.

Impairmentassets or in our overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of Long-Lived Assets

The Company’s long-livedthe assets including intangibles, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicateour overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; and (v) a significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period of time.

Once we determine that a potential impairment indicator exists, we perform the historical-costtest for recoverability by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the intangible assets with the intangible asset’s carrying amount. Where the carrying value of anthe intangible asset may no longer be appropriate. The Company assesses recoverability ofexceeds the asset by comparing thefuture undiscounted future net cash flows expected to result fromassociated with the intangible assets, it is determined that the value of those intangible assets cannot be recovered. For an intangible asset to its carrying value. Iffailing the carrying value exceeds the undiscounted future net cash flows of the asset,recoverability test, an impairment losscharge is measured and recognized. An impairment loss is measured asrecorded for the difference between the net bookcarrying value and the estimated fair value of the long-lived asset.

Long-lived assets were evaluated for impairment and novalue. No impairment losses were incurred during the years ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015, respectively.2019.

 

StockFair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is an estimate of the exit price, representing the amount that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants (i.e., the exit price at the measurement date). Fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction cost. Fair value measurement under U.S. GAAP provides for use of a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly, and reasonably available. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and are developed based compensationon market data obtained from sources independent of the Company.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflect the assumptions that the Company develops based on available information about what market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability.

An asset or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Availability of observable inputs can vary and is affected by a variety of factors. The Company uses judgment in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities and Level 3 assets and liabilities involve greater judgment than Level 1 and Level 2 assets or liabilities.


AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. Cash and cash equivalents are classified as Level 1. Long-term debt is classified as Level 2.

The Company had no assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

The table below provides information on our liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

     Fair Value 
(in thousands) Fair Value  Hierarchy 
Warrant liability (1), December 31, 2020 $-   Level 3 
Warrant liability (1), December 31, 2019 $120   Level 3 

(1)In the third quarter of 2020, the warrant liability was extinguished upon full exercise of the warrants, which were issued in connection with our credit facility (see Note 6 – Debt for additional information on our credit facility and related warrant liability). The fair value of the warrant liability was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, gains on fair value adjustments totaling $120,000 and $99,000, respectively, were included in the statements of operations within change in fair value of warrant liability.

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company measures the cost ofperiodically issues options, warrants and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) as compensation for services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award. For employees and directors, thereceived. The fair value of the award is measured on the grant date and for non-employees, the fair value of the award is estimated at the earlier of a commitment date of completion of services. The non-employee awards are generally re-measured on vesting dates and interim financial reporting dates until the service period is complete.date. The fair value amount is then recognized as expense over the requisite vesting period during which services are required to be provided in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period.award. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded by the Company in the same expense classifications in the consolidated statements of operations, as if such amounts were paid in cash.

 

The fair value of options and warrants awards is measured on the grant date using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, which includes assumptions that are subjective and are generally derived from external data (such as risk-free rate of interest) and historical data (such as volatility factor, expected term, and forfeiture rates). Future grants of equity awards accounted for as stock-based compensation could have a material impact on reported expenses depending upon the number, value, and vesting period of future awards.

We estimate the fair value of restricted stock unit awards with time- or performance-based vesting using the value of our common stock on the date of grant. We estimate the fair value of market-based restricted stock unit awards using a Monte Carlo simulation model on the date of grant.

We expense the compensation cost associated with time-based options, warrants and RSUs as the restriction period lapses, which is typically a one- to three-year service period with the Company. Compensation expense related to performance-based options and RSUs is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, provided that it is probable that performance conditions will be achieved, with probability assessed on a quarterly basis and any changes in expectations recognized as an adjustment to earnings in the period of the change. Compensation cost is not recognized for service- and performance-based awards that do not vest because service or performance conditions are not satisfied and any previously recognized compensation cost is reversed. Compensation costs related to awards with market conditions are recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period regardless of whether the market condition is satisfied, and is not reversed provided that the requisite service period derived from the Monte-Carlo simulation has been completed. If vesting occurs prior to the end of the requisite service period, expense is accelerated and fully recognized through the vesting date.

Income Taxes

 

DeferredWe use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. These assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.

 

The Company has net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income. Future tax benefits for these net operating loss carryforwards are recognized to the extent that realization of these benefits is considered more likely than not. To the extent that the Company will not realize a future tax benefit, a valuation allowance is established.

 


AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Earnings (Loss) Per Share (“EPS”)

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share are computedEPS is calculated by dividing net income or loss,(loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is calculated based on the net income (loss) available to common stockholders and the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, adjusted for the effects of all potential dilutive common stock issuances related to options, warrants, restricted stock units and convertible preferred stock. The dilutive effect of our share-based awards and warrants is computed using the treasury stock method, which assumes all share-based awards and warrants are exercised and the hypothetical proceeds from exercise are used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share and basic earnings (loss) per shareThe incremental shares (i.e., the difference between shares assumed to be issued versus purchased), to the extent they would have been dilutive, are not included in the denominator of the diluted EPS calculation. The dilutive effect of our convertible preferred stock is computed using the if-converted method, which assumes conversion at the beginning of the year. However, when a net loss exists, no potential common stock equivalents are included in the computation of the diluted per-share amount because the computation would result in an anti-dilutive per-share amount.

Potentially dilutive securities outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, which were excluded from the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share computation untilfor the Company has Net Income. Diluted loss per share including the dilutive effects of common stock equivalents on an “as if converted” basis would reduce the loss per share and thereby be antidilutive.years then ended, are as follows:

 

F-11

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

  December 31, 
(in thousands) 2020  2019 
Preferred stock  263   295 
Options  517   965 
Warrants  81   425 
Restricted stock units  958   429 
Total  1,819   2,114 

 

Derivative Instrument LiabilityLoss Contingencies

 

The Company accounts for derivative instrumentsWe are subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies arising in accordance with ASC 815, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other financial instruments or contracts and requires recognitionthe normal course of all derivatives onbusiness. We consider the balance sheet at fair value, regardless of hedging relationship designation. Accounting for changes in fair valuelikelihood of the derivative instruments depends on whether the derivatives qualify as hedge relationships and the typesloss or impairment of relationships designated are based on the exposures hedged. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not have any derivative instruments that were designated as hedges.

On October 9, 2015, the Company issued convertible promissory notes representing $2,500,000 in aggregate principal together with warrants exercisable for up to 25,000,000 shares of Common Stock. The warrants have a strike price of $0.10 and term of 5 years. In addition, in 2016, in connection with the sale of the Company’s common stock, the Company issued warrants exercisable for up to 1,752,000 shares of Common Stock. The warrants have a strike price of $0.25 and a term of 5 years.

In accordance with ASC 815, these outstanding warrants are deemed to contain embedded derivatives. The value of the derivative instrument will fluctuate with the price of the Company’s common stock and is recorded as a current liability on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The change in the value of the liability is recorded as “unrealized gain (loss) on derivative liability” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. This is a non-cash income (expense) item and is adjusted in the “operating activities” of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the derivative liability was stated at $3,478,626 and $439,361, respectively. The change in fair value of $2,758,488 was driven by the increased value of the Company’s common stock in the period and recorded as the “Loss on change in derivative liability” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. As the warrants are exercised or expire, the derivative liability will be adjusted on the balance sheet and an adjustment will be reflected in stockholders equity under additional paid-in capital.

Financial Instruments

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial instruments, consisting of cash equivalents, short-term investments, account and notes receivable, accounts and notes payable, short-term borrowings and certain other liabilities, approximate their fair value due to their relatively short maturities. The carrying amount of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value since the stated rate of interest approximates a market rate of interest.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is an estimate of the exit price, representing the amount that would be received to, sell an asset or paid to transferthe incurrence of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants (i.e.,as well as our ability to reasonably estimate the exit price at the measurement date). Fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction cost. Fair value measurement under generally accepted accounting principles provides for useamount of a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels: 

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly, and reasonably available. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflect the assumptions that the Company develops based on available information about what market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability.

F-12

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

An asset or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Availability of observable inputs can vary and is affected by a variety of factors. The Company uses judgmentloss in determining fair value of assets and liabilities and Level 3 assets and liabilities involve greater judgment than Level 1 and Level 2 assetsloss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it is probable that a liability has been incurred or liabilities.

In October and November 2015, the Company issued warrants with an exercise price of $0.10 in connection with a convertible debt instruments. The five year warrants also contain a provision that the warrant exercise price will automatically be adjusted for any common stock equity issuances at less than $0.10 per share. The Company determined that the warrants were not afforded equity classification because the warrants are not considered to be indexed to the Company’s own stock due to the anti-dilution provision. Accordingly, the warrants are treated as a derivative liability and are carried at fair value.

The Company estimated the fair value of these derivative warrants at initial issuance and again at each balance sheet date. The changes in fair value are recognized in earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Operations under the caption “unrealized gain/(loss) – derivative liability” until such time as the derivative warrants are exercised or expire. The Company used the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model to estimate the fair value of the dates of issuance, the price of the Company stock ranged $0.031 to $0.058, volatility was estimated to be 102%, the risk free rate ranged 1.14% to 1.75%asset has been impaired and the remaining term was 5 years.

In 2016, the Company issued warrants with an exercise priceamount of $0.25 in connection with the sale of Common Stock. The five year warrants also containloss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly evaluate current information available to us to determine whether to accrue for a provision that the warrant exercise price will automatically be adjusted forloss contingency and adjust any common stock equity issuances at less than $0.25 per share. The Company determined that the warrants were not afforded equity classification because the warrants are not considered to be indexed to the Company’s own stock due to the anti-dilution provision. Accordingly, the warrants are treated as a derivative liability and are carried at fair value.previous accrual.

The Company estimated the fair value of these derivative warrants at initial issuance and again at each balance sheet date. The changes in fair value are recognized in earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Operations under the caption “unrealized gain/(loss) – derivative liability” until such time as the derivative warrants are exercised or expire. The Company used the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model to estimate the fair value of the dates of issuance, the price of the Company stock ranged $0.150 to $0.195, volatility was estimated to be from 169% to 178%, the risk free rate ranged 1.22% to 1.55% and the remaining term was 5 years. The estimated initial fair value of these warrants of $280,777 was reclassified from equity to liability at the date of issuance.

At December 31, 2016, the price of the Company stock was 0.14, volatility was estimated to be 175.57%, the risk free rate of 1.47 to 1.93%% and the remaining term ranged from 3.77 to 4.97 years. As of December 31, 2016, the fair value of the warrants was determined to be $3,478,626, resulting in an unrealized loss on the change in the fair value of this derivative liability of $2,758,488 for the year ended December 31, 2016.

F-13

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

The following are the Company’s assets and liabilities, measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:

     Fair Value
  Fair Value  Hierarchy
Assets      
Marketable securities, December 31, 2016 $1,200  Level 1
Marketable securities, December 31, 2015 $3,600  Level 1
       
Liabilities      
Derivative Liability , December 31, 2016 $3,478,626  Level 3
Derivative Liability , December 31, 2015 $439,361  Level 3

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

There are various updates recentlyIn August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued most of which represented technical corrections toAccounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-15, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract.” This ASU clarifies the accounting literature or application to specific industries and aretreatment for implementation costs for cloud computing arrangements (hosting arrangements) that is a service contract. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that fiscal year. We adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2020. The adoption of this guidance did not expected to a have a material impact on the Company'sour financial position, results of operations or cash flows.disclosures.

 

NOTE 4 — MARKETABLE AND NON-MARKETABLE SECURITIESIn August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” This ASU adds, modifies, and removes several disclosure requirements relative to the three levels of inputs used to measure fair value in accordance with Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement.” This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that fiscal year. We adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2020. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact our financial position, results of operations or disclosures.

 

During 2014, the Company converted $60,000 of accounts receivable initially for a convertible note from Ecologic Transportation. Ecologic Transportation is affiliated with a former director of the Company. The note was convertible into 600,000 shares of Ecologic Transportation common stock. Subsequently, Ecologic Transportation merged into Peartrack Security Systems, Inc. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company held 60,000 shares in Peartrack Security Systems, Inc. The fair value of the investment on the date of conversion was $24,000 and as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $1,200 and $3,600, respectively. This resulted in a loss on the conversion date of the accounts receivable of $36,000 in 2014, and further unrealized losses of $2,400 and $10,200 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

During 2014, the Company entered into a licensing transaction where it received 1,200,000 shares of Beta Music Group. This investment was deemed to be an investment in nonmarketable securities and the shares were recorded at cost of $-0-. As of December 31, 2016, the Company continues to hold 1,200,000 shares of Beta Music Group.

During 2014, the Company invested $50,000 in Cannonball Red in return for 97,500 shares with the expressed purpose of achieving new customers. Cannonball Red is affiliated with a related party. The Company recorded the investment at cost of $50,000 and the investment was determined to be nonmarketable securities. Subsequent to the investment in 2014, the Company and Cannonball Red entered into an agreement where upon Cannonball Red would repurchase the investment for $60,000 at an agreed upon future date. The parties have not agreed upon such date. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company held 97,500 shares of Cannonball Red, and Cannonball Red does not have the resources to repurchase the securities.

At December 31, 2016, the Company management performed an evaluation of its investment in Cannonball Red for purposes of determining the implied fair value of the asset at December 31, 2016. The test indicated that the recorded book value of its investment exceeded its fair value for the year ended December 31, 2016. As a result, upon completion of the assessment, management recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $50,000, net of tax to reduce the carrying value to $0. The impairment charge is reflected as part of the loss from operations in the accompanying financial statements. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate the fair value. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from management’s estimates.

F-14

 

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 20162020 AND 20152019

 

NOTE 54PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENTINTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

Property, plantIntangible assets as of December 31, 2020 and equipment consist2019 consisted of the following:

 

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Computers and peripherals $25,478  $25,478 
Accumulated deprecation  (25,478)  (25,478)
Property, plant and equipment, net $-  $- 

  December 31, 
(in thousands)  2020  2019 
Finite-lived assets:        
Patents $3,779  $3,698 
Capitalized software development costs  2,676   1,717 
Accumulated amortization  (4,328)  (3,710)
Finite-lived assets, net  2,127   1,705 
Indefinite-lived assets:        
Domain name  10   10 
Intangible assets, net $2,137  $1,715 

Depreciation expense totaled $-0- and $651 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

NOTE 6 — INTANGIBLE ASSETSAs of December 31, 2020 and 2019, capitalized cost associated with pending patents totaled $141,000 and zero, respectively.

 

For the years ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015,2019, software development costs capitalized totaled $1,157,000 and $307,000, respectively.

Refer to Note 3 – Significant Accounting Policies for additional information regarding our intangible assets, including specific information on our patents and capitalized software development costs.

The following table summarizes amortization expense associated with intangible assets for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:

  Year ended December 31, 
(in thousands) 2020  2019 
Patents $428  $375 
Capitalized software development costs  449   279 
Total amortization expense $877  $654 

The weighted average remaining useful life of our finite-lived intangible assets (in years) as of December 31, 2020 are as follows:

Weighted average remaining amortization period (in years)
Patents2.1
Capitalized software development costs2.4

No loss on impairment of long-lived assets was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

NOTE 5 — LEASE LIABILITIES AND RIGHT OF USE ASSETS

We determine whether an arrangement is a lease at inception. Right-of-use assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease.

Finance Leases

The Company has finance leases to purchase computer equipment. The amortization expense of the leased equipment is included in depreciation expense. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company’s outstanding finance lease obligations totaled $61,000 and $104,000, respectively. The effective interest rate of the finance leases is estimated at 6.0% based on the implicit rate in the lease agreements.

The following summarizes the assets acquired under finance leases, included in property and equipment:

  As of December 31, 
(in thousands) 2020  2019 
Computer equipment $177  $157 
Less: accumulated depreciation  (116)  (60)
Assets acquired under finance leases, net $61  $97 


AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Operating Leases

Operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term. Right-of-use assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Since our lease arrangements do not provide an implicit rate, we use our estimated incremental borrowing rate for the expected remaining lease term at commencement date in determining the present value of future lease payments. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The Company has operating leases for office space in Tucson, Arizona and Marietta, Georgia. The lease for the principal office located in Tucson consists of approximately 5,200 square feet and ends in October 2022. The lease for the Marietta office, which consists of approximately 6,700 square feet, commenced in June 2019 and expires in August 2024. The company also leases office space in Scottsdale, Arizona from a company controlled by our Executive Chairman, which continues on a month-to-month basis, therefore was not measured under ASC 842.

In addition, the Company investedentered into membership agreements to occupy shared office space in PatentsNew York and Portland, Oregon. The membership agreements do not qualify as a lease under ASC 842 as the owner has substantive substitution rights, therefore the Company expenses membership fees as they are incurred. See Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies for further details on our shared office arrangements.

The Company made operating lease payments in the amountsamount of $42,640$255,000 and $43,689$231,000 during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

 

Patents, technologyThe following summarizes the total lease liabilities and other intangiblesremaining future minimum lease payments at December 31, 2020 (in thousands):

Year ending December 31, Finance
Leases
  Operating
Leases
  Total 
2021 $50  $262  $312 
2022  14   257   271 
2023  1   118   119 
2024  -   81   81 
Total minimum lease payments  65   718   783 
Less: present value discount  (4)  (62)  (66)
Total lease liabilities 61  $656  717 
Current portion of lease liabilities $49  229  278 
Long term portion of lease liabilities $12  $427  $439 

The following summarizes expenses associated with contractualour finance and operating leases for the year ended December 31, 2020 (in thousands):

Finance lease expenses:   
Depreciation expense $56 
Interest on lease liabilities  6 
Total Finance lease expense  62 
Operating lease expense  292 
Short-term lease and related expenses  155 
Total lease expenses $509 

The following table provides information about the remaining lease terms are generally amortized over their estimated useful livesand discount rates applied as of ten years. WhenDecember 31, 2020:

Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
Operating Leases2.95
Finance Leases1.44
Weighted average discount rate (%)
Operating Leases6.00
Finance Leases6.00


AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

NOTE 6 — DEBT

Related party credit facility

On August 14, 2019, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Sero Capital LLC (“Sero Capital”), a stockholder who owns more than 10% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company. The beneficial owner of Sero Capital is David Moradi, who became a director of the Company on November 8, 2019 and was appointed the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Strategy Officer on August 13, 2020. The Loan Agreement provided the Company with an unsecured credit facility under which the Company could have borrowed up to the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000. Any advances under the Loan Agreement would bear interest at a per annum rate of 10% (subject to increase in the event of a default). The term of the Loan Agreement extended through August 14, 2020 and provided for certain customary covenants, representations and events of default. No amounts were drawn under the credit facility through its expiration on August 14, 2020.

In consideration of the Loan Agreement, the Company issued to Sero Capital common stock warrants to acquire up to a total of 146,667 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share, which were classified as a liability instrument since the holder had the option to require the Company to repurchase the warrants when certain events occurred that were considered outside of the control of the Company. In the third quarter of 2020, the Company received $880,000 in cash in connection with Sero Capital’s full exercise of these warrants. The estimated fair value of the warrants held by Sero Capital was $219,000 at the date of issuance and was included in debt issuance costs on the balance sheets. Debt issuance cost was amortized as interest expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the associated credit facility. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the unamortized balance of debt issuance costs was zero and $137,000, respectively.

Term loan

On April 15, 2020, the Company entered into a loan agreement in the amount of $1,302,000 with Liberty Capital Bank (“Lender”) pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP Loan”) of the CARES Act, which is administered by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”). Pursuant to the terms of the PPP Loan, principal and interest payments are deferred until the date on which the SBA either remits to the Lender the amount of the PPP Loan that will be forgiven by the SBA or changesnotifies the Lender that the PPP Loan or a portion thereof will not be forgiven. The loan has a maturity of two years and bears an interest rate of 1.0% per annum. The PPP Loan is not collateralized and is not personally guaranteed. No fees were charged in operating conditions occur, an impairment assessment is performed and livesconnection with the loan. All or a portion of intangible assets with determinable livesthe PPP Loan may be adjusted.forgiven upon SBA’s approval of the Company’s pending forgiveness application. As of December 31, 2020 the outstanding principal balance of the PPP Loan totaled $1,302,000 and accrued interest thereon totaled $9,000.

 

Software development costs are amortized over their estimated useful life of three years.

Prior to any impairment adjustment, intangible assetsOutstanding principal balances on debt consisted of the following:

 

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
Patents $3,697,710  $3,655,070 
Capitalized software development  621,567   621,567 
Accumulated amortization  (2,006,028)  (1,435,781)
Intangible assets, net $2,313,249  $2,840,856 

Amortization expense for patents totaled $373,398 and $361,133 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Amortization expense for software development totaled $196,849 and $172,436 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Total amortization expense totaled $570,247 and $533,569 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

(in thousands) December 31, 2020 
Term Loan $1,302 
Less: Short term portion  (219)
Long term portion of debt $1,083 

 

NOTE 7 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Dr. Carr Bettis, Executive Chairman and Chairman of Board of DirectorsSERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

 

As of December 31, 20162020 and 2015,2019, the Company owed Dr. Bettis $20,575had 90,000 and $72,944105,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”) outstanding, respectively. These shares of Preferred Stock were issued at $10 per share (the “stated value”), accrue 5% in accrued salary, respectively. In addition, AudioEye sub-leases an office forcumulative annual dividends, and are convertible into the Company’s CEO Todd Bankofier from Verus Analytics, Inc,common stock at a company inprice of $4.385 per share. For the year ended December 31, 2020, preferred stockholders collectively earned, but were not paid, dividends totaling approximately $51,000, which Dr. Bettis haswere equivalent to 11,574 shares of common stock based on a controlling interest in. The sub-lease amount is $500conversion price of $4.385 per month totaling $6,000 and $1,000 in 2016 and 2015, respectively. The amount of $-0- and $1,000 in Rent Payable is included inside Accounts Payable within the Consolidated Balance Sheet asshare. As of December 31, 20162020 and 2015, respectively.2019, cumulative and unpaid dividends were approximately $255,000 and $245,000, respectively, which is equivalent to 58,288 and 55,927 shares of common stock, respectively, based on a conversion price of $4.385 per share.

On any matter presented to the stockholders of the Company for vote, holders of Preferred Stock are entitled to cast the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which their shares of Preferred Stock are convertible as of the record date to vote on such matter. As long as any shares of Preferred Stock are outstanding, the Company has certain restrictions on share repurchases and amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation in a manner that adversely affects any rights of the holders of Preferred Stock.

In addition, the holders of Preferred Stock have a liquidation preference for purposes of which the Preferred Stock would be valued at $10 per share plus accrued cumulative annual dividends. At December 31, 2016, an estimated $8,0002020 and 2019, the liquidation preference was duevalued at $1,155,000 and accrued$1,295,000, respectively. In the event of any liquidity event, holders of Preferred Stock shall be entitled to Dr. Bettis for unreimbursed travel related expenses.be paid their liquidation preference out of the assets of the Company legally available before any sums shall be paid to holders of common stock.

 

F-15

The Company is entitled to redeem any or all of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock at a per share price equal to 125% of the stated value, plus accumulated dividends, payable in cash. As of December 31, 2020, the aggregate amount to redeem all outstanding shares of Preferred Stock was $1,380,000.

 


AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 20162020 AND 20152019

 

Sean Bradley, President, Chief Technology Officer, and SecretaryNOTE 8 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

As discussed in Note 6 – Debt, we entered into a Loan Agreement with Sero Capital, a stockholder who owns more than 10% of December 31, 2016 and 2015,the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company. The beneficial owner of Sero Capital is David Moradi, who became a director of the Company owed Sean Bradley $3,543on November 8, 2019 and 6,250 in accrued salary. was appointed the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Strategy Officer on August 13, 2020. The Loan Agreement extended through August 14, 2020 and provided the Company with an unsecured credit facility under which we could have borrowed up to the aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000. No amounts were drawn under the credit facility though its expiration on August 14, 2020.

 

David Moradi

As of December 31, 2015In consideration for the Company owed David Moradi $70,000 in principal and $4,280 in accrued interest. During the year ended December 31, 2016, Mr. Moradi was paid in full. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurredLoan Agreement, we issued to Sero Capital common stock warrants to acquire up to a total of $44,912 legal expenses for services provided on corporate general matters by Anthion Management LLC, an entity affiliated with David Moradi.

Conversion of convertible notes payable

On April 18, 2016, the Company issued 2,506,849 shares of its common stock in settlement of an outstanding convertible note payable, issued in October 2015, for $200,000 and accrued interest $10,575 to KTK Capital, Inc., a material shareholder on a fully diluted basis.

On April 18, 2016, the Company issued 1,251,142 shares of its common stock in settlement of an outstanding convertible note payable, issued in October 2015, for $100,000 and accrued interest $5,096 to Equity Trust Custodian, FBO Alexandre Zynier IRA, an entity under the control of Alexandre Zynier, a member of the Company’s board of directors.

On April 18, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 18,353,310 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.175 per share for five years in settlement of convertible notes payable, issued in October 2015, in aggregate of $1,475,000 and accrued interest of $66,678 to Anthion Partners and Anthion Partners II LLC; entities under common control with David Moradi.

Sales of common stock

In 2016, the Company sold to CSB IV Holdings, a company under the control of Carr Bettis, an aggregate of 2,607,143146,667 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to acquire 292,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a term of five years,at an exercise price of $0.25$6.00 per shareshare. The warrants were fully exercised in August 2020 and is subject to anti-dilution protection, as defined,the warrant liability was extinguished. See Note- 6 – Debt for net proceeds of $365,000.

In 2016, the Company sold to Ernest Purcell, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, 1,607,137 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to acquire 180,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a term of five years, an exercise price of $0.25 per share and is subject to anti-dilution protection, as defined, for net proceeds of $225,000.

In 2016, the Company sold to Todd Bankofier, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, 178,571 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to acquire 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a term of five years, an exercise price of $0.25 per share and is subject to anti-dilution protection, as defined, for net proceeds of $25,000.

In 2016, the Company sold to Anthon Capital Management, an entity under the control of David Moradi, 892,857 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to acquire 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a term of five years, an exercise price of $0.25 per share and is subject to anti-dilution protection, as defined, for net proceeds of $125,000.

F-16

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Other

The Company holds 60,000 shares in Peartrack Security Systems, formerly Ecologic Transportation, as of December 31, 2014 resulting from the conversion of a $60,000 accounts receivable balance in 2014. Peartrack Security Systems is an entity whose Executive Chairman was former Company director, Edward Withrow III. In 2014, the Company invested $50,000 in Cannonball Red in return for 97,500 shares held as of December 31, 2014. Former CEO, Chief Innovation Officer and director Nathan Bradley had a material interest in Cannonball Red at the time of the transaction. At December 31, 2016, the Company recorded an impairment of $50,000 relating to the 97,500 shares of Cannonball Red to a net carrying value of $-0-.

In summary, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the total balances of related party payable were $32,118 and $153,474 (see Note 9), respectively.

NOTE 8 — NOTES PAYABLEadditional detail on our warrant liability.

 

As discussed in Note 5 – Lease Liabilities and Right of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has short term and long term notes payable of $23,800 and $-0-, and $24,000 and $1,923,499, respectively as shown in the table below. 

Notes and loans payable December 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
 
Short Term        
Maryland TEDCO $23,800  $24,000 
Total $23,800  $24,000 
Long Term        
Convertible Secured Note (net of unamortized discounts of $600,301 in 2015)  -   1,899,699 
Maryland TEDCO $-  $23,800 
Total $-  $1,923,499 

As of December 31, 2012, the Company had an outstanding loan toUse Assets, we lease office space from a third party in the amount of $74,900, which was originally issued during 2006 as part of an Investment Agreement. The loan was unsecured and bore interest at 25% per year for four years. The Company had accrued interest of $74,900, which was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. The note was in default until October 24, 2011, at which time the Company entered into a Termination and Release Agreement (“Release”) with the third party. The terms of the Release, among other things, terminated the Investment Agreement between the parties, and required the Company to issue a Promissory Note to the third-party in the combined amount of principal and accrued interest to date, for a total principal amount of $149,800. The note is interest free, and is payable in monthly installments of $2,000 beginning November 1, 2011. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the principal amount owing was $23,800 and $47,800, respectively, of which $23,800 and $24,000, respectively, has been recorded as the current portion of the note, and $-0- and $23,800, respectively, as the long-term portion of the note. The Company has paid $24,000 forcompany controlled by our Executive Chairman. For the year ended December 31, 2016.

On October 9, 2015 (the “Initial Closing Date”), AudioEye, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain investors (the “Investors”)2020, rent payments for the issuance and sale of convertible promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of up to $3,750,000 (the “Notes”) and warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase up to an aggregate of 37,500,000 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Common Stock”) (the “Transaction”). Notes representing up to $2,500,000 in aggregate principal, and Warrants exercisable for up to 25,000,000 shares of Common Stock in the aggregate, may be issued and sold at one or more closings during the 30-day period immediately following the Initial Closing Date. The maximum of $2,500,000 in aggregate principal was sold as of November 8, 2015. In addition, upon the election of any Investor within the three-year period immediately following the Initial Closing Date, any Investor may purchase an additional Note in the principal amount equal to 50% of the principal amount of the Notes purchased by such Investor at previous closings (the “Option Principal Amount”) and an additional Warrant with an aggregate exercise price equal to such Investor’s Option Principal Amount.

F-17

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

The Notes mature three years from the date of issuance (the “Maturity Date”) and, until the Notes are repaid or converted into shares of the Company’s equity securities (“Equity Securities”), accrue payable-in-kind interest at the rate of 10% per annum. As described in the Purchase Agreement, as amended (see below), if the Company sold Equity Securities in a single transaction or series of related transactions for cash of at least $1,000,000 (excluding the conversion of the Notes and excluding the shares of Common Stock to be issued upon exercise of the Warrants) on or before the Maturity Date (the “Equity Financing”), all of the unpaid principal on the Notes plus accrued interest shall be automatically converted at the closing of the Equity Financing into a number of shares of the same class or series of Equity Securities as are issued and sold by the Company in such Equity Financing (or a class or series of Equity Securities identical in all respects to and ranking pari passu with the class or series of Equity Securities issued and sold in such Equity Financing) as is determined by dividing (i) the principal and accrued and unpaid interest amount of the Notes by (ii) 60% of the price per share at which such Equity Securities are issued and sold in such Equity Financing. The Notes, if not converted, shall be due and payable in full on the Maturity Date.

The Notes contained customary events of default provisions. In connection with the issuance of the Notes, on October 9, 2015, the Company entered into a Security Agreement with the Investors (the “Security Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company granted a security interest in all of its assets to the Investors as collateral for the Company’s obligations under the Notes. As noted below, on April 18, 2016, the parties agreed to remove the security interest feature from the form of convertible promissory note that may be issued in the future under the Original Agreement.

The Warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share and expire 60 months following the date of issuance. The Warrants are subject to anti-dilution protection, subject to certain customary exceptions.

During 2015, the Company issued notes under this offering totaling $2,500,000. The fair value of the warrants issued in connection with the notes was determined to be $627,293 and was recognized as a discount to the debt being amortized to interest expense over the life of the loans. During year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, aggregate amortization of $600,301 and $26,992, respectively, was recognized against the discount.

In connection with the transaction, the Company also entered into amendments to certain agreements. On April 18, 2016, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement Amendment”) and an Omnibus Amendment to Secured Promissory Notes (the “Note Amendment”), which collectively amend that certain Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated as of October 9, 2015 (the “Original Agreement”) and the convertible promissory notes previously issued thereunder to, among other things (i) remove the right of Anthion Partners II, LLC (together with its affiliates, “Anthion”), entities under the control of David Moradi, to designate a member of the Board of Directors of the Company; (ii) amend the convertible promissory notes issued thereunder to provide that if a change of control of the Company occurs prior to the maturity date or an equity financing (as defined therein), the convertible promissory note shall be repaid in an amount equal to the product of (a) 1.4 and (b) the outstanding principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder; (iii) reduce the conversion threshold in the definition of “qualified financing” under the convertible promissory notes from $2,000,000 to $1,000,000; (iv) remove the security interest feature from the form of convertible promissory note that may be issued in the future under the Original Agreement, as amended, and (v) provide for optional conversion into warrants containing “blocker” provisions (“Special Warrants”) instead of shares upon an equity financing. The Company also made certain amendments to outstanding warrants to add similar “blocker” provisions.

On April 18, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 12,834,800 shares of its common stock to the Note holders other than Anthion, and 18,353,310 warrants to acquire its common stock to Anthion in lieu of common stock. Collectively the common stock and warrants issued were in full settlement of $2,500,000 convertible notes and accrued interest of $119,801. The warrants issued to Anthion are exercisable at $0.001 per share for five years from the date of issuance. 

F-18

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

At the date of conversion, the Company determined that the conversion price of $0.84 per share did not exceed the fair value of Common Stock at note inception, therefore there was no beneficial conversion feature upon conversion of $1,025,000 of convertible notes and accrued interest. However, the Company determined that the estimated fair value of the 18,353,310 warrants of $3,205,959 exceeded the settlement of $1,541,678 of convertible notes and accrued interest and accordingly recorded a loss of settlement of debt of $1,664,281 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company used the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model to estimate the fair value of the warrants at the date of conversion using the following assumptions: the price of the Company stock of $0.175, volatility was estimated to be 178%, the risk free rate of 1.24% and the remaining term was 5 years.office space totaled $70,000.

 

NOTE 9 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Operating leases

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 5210 E. Williams Circle, Suite 750, Tucson, Arizona 85711, consisting of approximately 2,362 square feet as of December 31, 2016. The Company’s principal executiveMembership agreement to occupy shared office is leased for an aggregate amount of $4,724 per month through September 1, 2016 and an aggregate amount of $5,474 per month as of December 31, 2016. The Company also has offices in Atlanta, previously located at 1855 Piedmont Road, Suite 200, Marietta, Georgia leased for an aggregate of $2,763 per month. Beginning September 1, 2016, we re-located offices located at 3901 Roswell Road, Suite 134, leased for an aggregate of $3,937 per month as of December 31,2016. During 2015, offices located in New York were sublet, resulting in a savings of $21,135 per month. Both the lease and sublease in New York have expired, as of December 31, 2016. We closed the office in Washington D.C., saving $1,280 per month and the Principal Executive office was relocated and downsized with a monthly reduction in rent of $7,146. Beginning November 1, 2015, we subleased an office from a company controlled by our Executive Chairman in Scottsdale, AZ for $500 per month.

Rent expense charged to operations, which differs from rent paid due to rent credits and to increasing amounts of base rent, is calculated by allocating total rental payments on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, rent expense was $109,340 and $314,485, respectively and as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, net deferred rent payable was $14,657 and $-0-, respectively.;

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for all non-cancelable operating leases for each of the next three years ending December 31 and thereafter:

Year ended December 31,    
2017 $111,603 
2018  105,168 
2019  37,719 
Total $254,490 

Employment contractsspace

Nathaniel Bradley. Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, Nathaniel Bradley was employed as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is three years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual salary of $200,000 during the employment period. He is entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of the Company’s board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. Bradley is also entitled to equity awards under the Company’s incentive compensation plans. In connection with entry into the Executive Employment Agreement, the Company and Mr. Bradley terminated the existing employment agreement, dated April 1, 2010, between the Company and Mr. Bradley effective as of August 7, 2013. 

F-19

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

 

In April 2015, two shareholder class action lawsuits were filed against usthe second quarter of 2020, the Company entered into a membership agreement to occupy shared office space in Portland, Oregon. The membership agreement ends in August 2021 and our former officer Nathaniel Bradley and former officer Edward O’Donnell inprovides for fees which are based on the U.S. District Court for the Districtnumber of Arizona. The plaintiffs allege various causes of action against the defendants arising from our announcement that our previously issued financial results for the first three quarters of 2014contracted seats and the guidance for the fourth quarteruse of 2014 and the full year of 2014 could no longer be relied upon. The complaints seek, among other relief, compensatory damages and plaintiff’s counsel’s fees and experts’ fees. The Court has appointed a lead plaintiff and lead counsel. We have responded to the complaints and also filed a motion to dismiss. We believe that the lawsuits have no merit and intend to mount a vigorous defense. Given the current stage of the proceedings in this case, our management currently cannot assess the probability of losses, or reasonably estimate the range of losses, related to these matters.optional office services. As of December 31, 2015, we have paid the deductible pursuant to the D&O insurance policy, in the amount of $100,000 regarding2020, minimum fees due under this matter.

Effective April 24, 2015, Nathaniel Bradley resigned as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company. Effective with his resignation as Chief Executive Officer and President, the Company’s board of directors appointed Mr. Bradley to serve as Founder and Chief Innovation Officer as well as Treasurer of the Company. Effective May 1, 2015, Mr. Bradley agreed to reduce his annual base salary to $125,000.

Effective August 27, 2015 Mr. Bradley resigned from his position as Chief Innovation Officer and member of the board of directors.

Sean Bradley. Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, Sean Bradley was employed as the Company’s Chief Technology Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is three years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual salary of $195,000 during the employment period. He is entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of the Company’s board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. Bradley is also entitled to equity awards under the Company’s incentive compensation plans. In connection with entry into the Executive Employment Agreement, the Company and Mr. Bradley terminated the existing employment agreement, dated April 1, 2010, between the Company and Mr. Bradley effective as of August 7, 2013. 

Effective April 24, 2015, the Company’s board of directors appointed Sean Bradley to serve as President of the Company as well as continuing as Chief Technology Officer and Secretary. Effective May 1, 2015, Mr. Bradley agreed to reduce his annual base salary to $150,000. October 1, 2015 the board and Mr. Bradley agreed that in lieu of cash Mr. Bradley would receive up to $6,250 per quarter in compensation in the form of market value of options or warrants. On December 22, 2015, subject to shareholder approval of the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan the compensation committee of the board approved a performance option agreement for Mr. Bradley. The number of shares that vest under the performance options are determined based upon the company’s and Mr. Bradley’s (as applicable) performance compared to performance goals described below. The compensation committee established a target number of shares of 1,500,000 options whereby to each option will vest only upon: (a) satisfaction of a share price condition described below; and (b) 100% achievement of the performance goals by the company and Mr. Bradley, as applicable. Subject to the share price condition, 50% of the target award will be earned by Mr. Bradley at the 85% achievement level, and he can earn up to 150% of the target award at the 125% achievement level. Vesting shall be determined based upon performance measures at the end of each calendar year of 2016 and 2017, with 50% of each target award and performance increase subject to vesting during each performance period. Mr. Bradley shall have the opportunity to achieve full vesting of 100% of the target award and performance increase if there is a shortfall in the first performance period but cumulative performance goals are achieved for the two-year period ending on the measurement date at the end of the second performance period. The number of vested performance options shall be determined for a performance period by reference to the company's actual achievement against the following performance objectives: (a) Targeted cash contract bookings (as to 33.33%); (b) Targeted net operating cash flow (as to 33.33%); (c) Board defined operations goals (as to 33.33%) for a performance period. And, vesting shall only occur if the closing share price of the company’s common stock on each of the 20 trading days before and including the end of a performance period is not less than $0.20 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, combinations, recapitalization and the like).

F-20

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

The Company’s board or committee shall in its sole discretion establish goals as to specific matters and amounts with respect to a performance period. The performance options shall have a term of five years from the date of grant and the exercise price shall be determined by using a 10-day average closing price of the company’s common stock over the ten (10) trading days beginning on January 4, 2016, which the committee has determined to be and the Board agrees is an amount that is not less than the fair market value of a share of the common stock of the company on such date.

The Board also approved the grant to Mr. Bradley of a long-term equity component of his compensation in the form of an RSU with a seven-year term representing the right to receive, subject to the terms and upon the conditions of the RSU, 150,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. This RSU is also subject to the Award Vesting Conditions.

James Crawford. Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, James Crawford was employed as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is three years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual salary of $185,000 during the employment period. He is entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of the Company’s board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. Crawford is also entitled to equity awards under the Company’s incentive compensation plans.

Effective April 24, 2015, James Crawford resigned as Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer of the Company.

Also on April 24, 2015, the Company and Crawdad, LLC. (“Crawdad”), a limited liability company wholly owned by Mr. Crawford, entered into a Consulting Agreement pursuant to which Crawdad, through Mr. Crawford, is to provide certain consulting services to the Company for a period of 12 months for a consulting fee of $5,000 per month.

The consulting agreement with Crawdad was terminated by mutual agreement on December 31, 2015.

Edward O’Donnell. Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, Mr. O’Donnell was employed as our Chief Financial Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement was two years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He was to receive a base annual salary of $165,000 during the employment period. He was entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. O’Donnell was also entitled to equity awards under our incentive compensation plan.

Effective March 29, 2015, Edward O’Donnell resigned from his position as our Chief Financial Officer.

Constantine Potamianos. Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, Constantine Potamianos was employed as the Company’s Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is two years commencing August 7, 2013, subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He was to receive a base annual salary of $150,000 during the employment period. He was entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of the Company’s board of directors or the compensation committee. Mr. Potamianos was also entitled to equity awards under the Company’s incentive compensation plan.

On August 7, 2015 Constantine Potamianos employment contract expired.

Paul Arena. On January 27, 2014, the Company entered into agreements with Paul Arena. Under an Executive Employment Agreement dated as of January 27, 2014, Mr. Arena had direct responsibility working in conjunction with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, over operations, sales marketing, financial accounting and SEC reporting, operational budgeting, sales costing analysis, billing and auditor interfacing. The initial term of Mr. Arena’s employment was two years. Mr. Arena’s base salary was $275,000 per year. Mr. Arena received a signing bonus of $35,000 and is entitled to a quarterly bonus of up to $50,000 based on recognized revenues for the applicable quarter and additional bonuses at the discretion of our board of directors or compensation committee. 

F-21

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Mr. Arena was granted five year warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share and stock options to purchase 1,500,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.40 per share subject to vesting as set forth in the Executive Employment Agreement. Pursuant to a separate Performance Share Unit Agreement dated as of January 27, 2014, the Company granted to Mr. Arena an award of up to 3,000,000 PSUs. Each PSU represents the right to receive one share of common stock. The number of PSUs that Mr. Arena actually earned was to be determined by the level of achievement of the performance goals set forth in the Performance Share Unit Agreement. Mr. Arena was granted an award of an aggregate of 1,500,000 PSUs at target value of established goals. 35% of these awards were tied to targeted revenue goals over the years ended January 31, 2015 and January 31, 2016. 35% of these awards were tied to targeted cash flow goals over the years, and 30% were tied to discretionary goals. The award was to pay above or below the target number of shares based on performance. In order to receive any shares the threshold value of goals was 75% of the target, which would have had a payout at 1,000,000 shares. The maximum share payout was 3,000,000 shares if 125% of performance targets were met. The Company would have used interpolation to determine share payouts if the performance metric values achieved are between the thresholds, target and maximum goal levels.

On March 5, 2015, the Company and Paul Arena entered into a Separation and Release Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) pursuant to which Mr. Arena resigned as Executive Chairman/Chairman of the Board and a member of the Board of Directors. Under the Separation Agreement, the Company and Mr. Arena agreed that, pursuant to his Stock Option Agreement with the Company, options to purchase 500,000 common shares have been vested, options to purchase an additional 500,000 shares (the “Second Tranche”) are vested and options to purchase 500,000 shares will be forfeited.

Fifty percent of the options under the Second Tranche are subject to certain clawback provisions as set forth in the Separation Agreement. Additionally, Mr. Arena was being granted 500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted Common Stock (the “Restricted Shares”) with 250,000 shares being deposited in escrow to cover the clawback rights of the Company. The Restricted Shares are being issued to Mr. Arena in lieu of any issuances which may be due him under his Performance Share Unit Agreement. The Restricted Shares and shares issuable pursuant to options described above are subject to a Lock-up/Leakage Agreement under which Mr. Arena is limited to a cap of $50,000 in gross proceeds from the sale of such shares in any month.

Also on March 5, 2015, the Company and AIM Group, Inc. (“AIM”), a corporation wholly owned by Mr. Arena, entered into a Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) pursuant to which AIM, through Mr. Arena, is to provide certain consulting services to the Company for a period of one year. Under the Consulting Agreement, AIM was to receive a one-time net payment of $267,000. The Company filed the Separation Agreement as an exhibit to an 8-K filing. The Separation and Release Agreement specified that Mr. Arena is to receive a fee of $425,000 as well as other consideration valued at $54,892, for total consideration of $479,892. $250,909 was paid to Mr. Arena by the Company during 2014.

Dr. Carr Bettis. Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015, Dr. Carr Bettis was employed as our Executive Chairman. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is one year commencing July 1, 2015, terminable at will by either us or Dr. Bettis and subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual compensation of $175,000 during the employment period, paid at the end of every calendar quarter in the form of options to purchase shares of our common stock. The number of options to be issued for each quarterly period will be determined by means of a Black Scholes valuation whereby the number of options issued would have a value at the time of issuance equal to the dollar value of Dr. Bettis’ base salary for each calendar quarter. He is entitled to receive bonuses at the sole discretion of our board of directors or the compensation committee. Dr. Bettis is also entitled to equity awards under our incentive compensation plans. In November, 2015 the board and Dr. Bettis agreed that Dr. Bettis equity awards would be limited to 750,000 options or warrants per quarter and the balance of his compensation would be paid to Dr. Bettis in a form mutually agreeable to Dr. Bettis and the board. On December 22, 2015, subject to shareholder approval of the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan the compensation committee of the board approved a performance option agreement for Dr. Bettis. The number of shares that vest under the performance options are determined based upon the company’s and Dr. Bettis (as applicable) performance compared to performance goals described below.

F-22

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

The compensation committee established a target number of shares of 2,000,000 options whereby to each option will vest only upon: (a) satisfaction of a share price condition described below; and (b) 100% achievement of the performance goals by the company and Dr. Bettis, as applicable. Subject to the share price condition, 50% of the target award will be earned by Dr. Bettis at the 85% achievement level, and he can earn up to 150% of the target award at the 125% achievement level. Vesting shall be determined based upon performance measures at the end of each calendar year of 2016 and 2017, with 50% of each target award and performance increase subject to vesting during each performance period. Dr. Bettis shall have the opportunity to achieve full vesting of 100% of the target award and performance increase if there is a shortfall in the first performance period but cumulative performance goals are achieved for the two-year period ending on the measurement date at the end of the second performance period. The number of vested performance options shall be determined for a performance period by reference to the company's actual achievement against the following performance objectives: (a) Targeted cash contract bookings (as to 33.33%); (b) Targeted net operating cash flow (as to 33.33%); (c) Board defined operations goals (as to 33.33%) for a performance period. And, vesting shall only occur if the closing share price of the company’s common stock on each of the 20 trading days before and including the end of a performance period is not less than $0.20 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, combinations, recapitalization and the like). The company’s board or committee shall in its sole discretion establish goals as to specific matters and amounts with respect to a performance period. The performance options shall have a term of five years from the date of grant and the exercise price shall be determined by using a 10-day average closing price of the company’s common stock over the ten (10) trading days beginning on January 4, 2016, which the committee has determined to be and the Board agrees is an amount that is not less than the fair market value of a share of the common stock of the company on such date.

On December 7, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an extension to and modification of the existing employment contract with Dr. Carr Bettis, as well as the grant of certain equity awards to Dr. Bettis under the Company’s 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan. To best preserve the Company’s limited cash resources, the Employment Contract provides generally that Dr. Bettis’s base compensation is paid in the form of Restricted Stock Units (RSU’s).

In its December 7, 2016 action by written consent, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an award of RSU’s to Dr. Bettis in consideration of services Dr. Bettis rendered subsequent to June 30, 2016. The number of Employment Contract RSUs awarded was 602,620, which was determined by dividing $72,917 (the amount of compensation for the period July 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016) by $0.121, representing the 10-day average closing price of the Company’s Common Stock over the 10 trading days beginning November 17, 2016 (the “Award Pricing Methodology”). The Employment Contract RSUs of Dr. Bettis vest upon the satisfaction of both of the following conditions: (i) Dr. Bettis remains in service to the Company continuously through and until June 30, 2017, and (ii) the Company undergoes a change of control during the seven-year term of the award (the “Award Vesting Conditions”).

The Board also approved the grant to Dr. Bettis of a long-term equity component of his compensation in the form of an RSU with a seven-year term representing the right to receive, subject to the terms and upon the conditions of the RSU, 250,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, with such number of shares to be reduced by the number of shares, if any, that are awarded to Dr. Bettis in connection with the Performance Option Unit Agreement granted Dr. Bettis in January 2016 under the 2016 Plan. This RSU is also subject to the Award Vesting Conditions.

Todd Bankofier. Pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement dated as of November 10, 2015 Mr. Bankofier was employed as our Chief Executive Officer. The term of the Executive Employment Agreement is one year commencing November 10, 2015 and subject to extension upon mutual agreement. He is to receive a base annual salary of $125,000. Mr. Bankofier is also entitled to equity awards under our incentive compensation plan. On December 22, 2015, subject to shareholder approval of the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan the compensation committee of the board approved a performance option agreement for Mr. Bankofier. The number of shares that vest under the performance options are determined based upon the company’s and Mr. Bankofier (as applicable) performance compared to performance goals described below.

F-23

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

The compensation committee established a target number of shares of 2,000,000 options whereby to each option will vest only upon: (a) satisfaction of a share price condition described below; and (b) 100% achievement of the performance goals by the company and Mr. Bankofier, as applicable. Subject to the share price condition, 50% of the target award will be earned by Mr. Bankofier at the 85% achievement level, and he can earn up to 150% of the target award at the 125% achievement level. Vesting shall be determined based upon performance measures at the end of each calendar year of 2016 and 2017, with 50% of each target award and performance increase subject to vesting during each performance period. Mr. Bankofier shall have the opportunity to achieve full vesting of 100% of the target award and performance increase if there is a shortfall in the first performance period but cumulative performance goals are achieved for the two-year period ending on the measurement date at the end of the second performance period. The number of vested performance options shall be determined for a performance period by reference to the company's actual achievement against the following performance objectives: (a) Targeted cash contract bookings (as to 33.33%); (b) Targeted net operating cash flow (as to 33.33%); (c) Board defined operations goals (as to 33.33%) for a performance period. And, vesting shall only occur if the closing share price of the company’s common stock on each of the 20 trading days before and including the end of a performance period is not less than $0.20 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, combinations, recapitalization and the like). The company’s board or committee shall in its sole discretion establish goals as to specific matters and amounts with respect to a performance period. The performance options shall have a term of five years from the date of grant and the exercise price shall be determined by using a 10-day average closing price of the company’s common stock over the ten (10) trading days beginning on January 4, 2016, which the committee has determined to be and the Board agrees is an amount that is not less than the fair market value of a share of the common stock of the company on such date.

On December 7, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase to the base salary of Todd Bankofier, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Bankofier’s base annual salary was increased to $175,000. Mr. Bankofier also received a restricted stock unit award under the 2016 Plan (the “Bankofier RSUs”). The Bankofier RSUs have a seven-year term and represent the right to receive, subject to the terms and upon the conditions of the RSU award, 250,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, with such number of units to be reduced by the number of shares, if any, that are awarded to Mr. Bankofier in connection with the Performance Option Unit Agreement granted Mr. Bankofier in January 2016 under the 2016 Plan. The Bankofier RSUs vest under the Award Vesting Conditions.

Litigation

In April 2015, two shareholder class action lawsuits were filed against the Company and former officers Nathaniel Bradley and Edward O’Donnell in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs allege various causes of action against the defendants arising from our announcement that our previously issued financial results for the first three quarters of 2014 and the guidance for the fourth quarter of 2014 and the full year of 2014 could no longer be relied upon. The complaints sought among other relief, compensatory damages and plaintiff’s counsel’s fees and experts’ fees. The Court appointed a lead plaintiff and lead counsel, and consolidated the actions. A consolidated amended complaint was filed under the captionIn re AudioEye, Inc. Sec. Litigation.The Company and individual defendants filed a motion to dismiss. 

On July 25, 2016, in connection with a voluntary mediation, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the consolidated actions. The settlement agreement is subject to definitive documentation, shareholder notice, and court approval. The terms of the agreement include a settlement payment to the class of $1,525,000 from the Company’s insurer, with no admission of liability by any party. In 2015, the Company paid a deductible under its D&O insurance policy in the amount of $100,000 regarding this matter.

F-24

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

On January 23, 2017, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement pursuant to the terms set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement, provisionally certified a settlement class of shareholders, and directed plaintiffs' counsel to provide notice to that class. The Court will hold a Final Settlement Hearing May 8, 2017 to consider any objections to the Settlement that might be raised by settlement class members, to consider plaintiffs’ counsel's application for an award of fees and costs, and to finally determine whether the Order and Final Judgment as provided under the Stipulation of Settlement should be entered, dismissing the case with prejudice.

On May 16, 2016, a shareholder derivative complaint entitled LiPoChing, Derivatively and on Behalf of AudioEye, Inc., v. Bradley, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. As a derivative complaint, the plaintiff-shareholder purported to act on behalf of the Company against the Named Individuals. The Company was named as a nominal defendant. The complaint asserted causes of action including breach of fiduciary duty and others, arising from the Company’s restatement of its financial results for the first three quarters of 2014. The complaint sought, among other relief, compensatory damages, restitution and attorneys’ fees. In October 2016, the Company and Named Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. In response, the Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the complaint without prejudice.

On July 26, 2016, a shareholder derivative complaint entitled Denese M. Hebert, derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant AudioEye, Inc., v. Bradley, et al., was filed in the State of Arizona Superior Court for Pima County. The complaint generally asserts causes of action related to the Company’s restatement of its financial statements for the first three fiscal quarters of 2014. As a derivative complaint, the plaintiff-shareholder purports to act on behalf of the Company against the Named Individuals.shared office arrangement totaled $31,000.

 

The Company is named asalso entered into a nominal defendant. The Company understands that the Named Individuals intendmembership agreement to vigorously defend the lawsuit. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaintoccupy shared office space in February 2017, which presently is scheduled to be heard in May 2017. While the Company believes that its legal defense costs may be reimbursed by the Company’s insurance carrier, no reasonable estimateNew York, NY through July 2021. As of the outcome of the litigation, the related legalDecember 31, 2020, minimum fees or the impact on the financial results of the Company can be made as of the date ofdue under this statement.shared office arrangement totaled $59,000.

Litigation

 

We may become involved in various other routine disputes and allegations incidental to our business operations. While it is not possible to determine the ultimate disposition of these matters, our management believes that the resolution of any such matters, should they arise, is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

 


AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

NOTE 10 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

On December 9, 2020, the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2020 Plan”) was approved, replacing the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan. The 2020 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Company’s employees, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors. Awards under the 2020 Plan can be granted in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock units, other stock-based awards and cash incentive awards. Outstanding awards issued under previous equity incentive plans will continue to be governed by their respective terms until exercised, expired or otherwise terminated or canceled, but no further equity awards will be made under those plans.

The following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense recorded for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:

  Year ended December 31, 
(in thousands) 2020  2019 
Stock Options $300  $322 
Restricted Stock Units  3,789   894 
Unrestricted Shares of Common Stock  49   - 
Total $4,138  $1,216 

 

As of December 31, 20162020, the outstanding unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to options and 2015, the Company had 111,521,001restricted stock units (“RSUs”) was $1,373,000 and 81,717,154 shares$6,413,000, respectively, which may be recognized through August 2025, subject to achievement of common stock issuedservice, performance, and outstanding, respectively, and the Company had 160,000 and 175,000 sharesmarket conditions. As of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, respectively, issued at $10 per share, paying a 5% cumulative annual dividend and convertible at 0.1754 per share of common stock.December 31, 2020, there was no remaining unamortized stock-based compensation expense related to warrants.

 

On January 15, 2015, the Company sold 812,500 unitsStock Options

Options granted under the December 2014 Private Placement to one institutional investor for gross proceeds of $325,000 with no commission payable. Each unit in the December 2014 Private Placement consisted of one share of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase 0.375 share for every common share purchased (304,688 warrants were issued). The warrantsour equity incentive plans generally have a termterms of five years, and an exercise pricetypically vest and become fully exercisable ratably over three years of $0.60 per share.continuous service to the Company from the date of grant.

 

F-25

The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:

 

        Weighted     Intrinsic 
     Weighted  Average     Value 
  Number of  Average  Remaining     of 
  Options  Exercise Price  Term  Exercisable  Options 
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  997,989  $4.67   2.14   925,545  $4,705,000 
Granted  189,599   6.54   9.25         
Exercised  (37,528)  1.75             
Forfeited/Expired  (185,017)  11.83             
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  965,043  $3.70   3.01   759,631  $1,666,000 
Granted  220,267   12.31   5.00         
Exercised  (433,180)  2.07             
Forfeited/Expired  (235,219)  7.00             
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  516,911  $7.24   2.70   294,894  $9,610,000 
Exercisable as of December 31, 2020  294,894  $3.95   1.02      $6,452,000 

The 2020 and 2019 stock-based compensation was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for each fiscal year:

  2020  2019 
Expected life 3.16 years  4.70 years 
Risk-free interest rate 0.19%  1.87% 
Weighted average volatility factor 107.28%  148.41% 
Dividend yield    


AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 20162020 AND 20152019

 

On March 5, 2015, Paul Arena resigned as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Executive Chairman and was designated by AIM Group, Inc. as a consultant to the Company for the term of one year. The consulting agreement includes a fee of $425,000, which is offset by prior payments of $158,000 for a net amount of $267,000. In a separation agreement executed on March 5, 2015, the Company agreed to pay COBRA for Mr. Arena for a period of eighteen months. Mr. Arena also agreed to assume all obligations under an existing apartment lease in New York City under the remainder of the lease term and return $48,000 security deposit paid by the company, $6,250 or half of the final month’s rent of $12,500 and receive a 1099 not to exceed $20,000 representing the fair value of furniture in the apartment. In regard to the option agreement of 1,500,000 warrants dated January 27, 2014, the Company and Mr. Arena agree the 500,000 warrants are vested, 500,000 are subject to mutually agreed upon provisions and 500,000 warrants are forfeited. On March 5, 2015, the Company and Mr. Arena agree to the issuance of 500,000 restricted common shares in lieu of an issuances related to the January 27, 2014 issuance of 3,000,000 PSUs. The agreement calls for the immediate release for 250,000 common shares (valued at $117,500 and recognized during 2015), or 50% and up to 250,000 common shares or 50% be held in escrow until April 1, 2016 or until the Company’s 2015 audited financials are final. The restricted common stock shall be subject to a Lock-up/Leak-out agreement.Restricted Stock Units

 

Commencing on May 1, 2015, the Company sold an aggregate of 175,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”)We issue RSUs to 12 accredited investors at a purchase price of $10.00 per share (the “Purchase Price”) for proceeds of $1,750,000 in a private placement. Each share of the Preferred Stock may be converted into shares of common stock of the Company by dividing the Purchase Price plus any accumulated dividends with respect to such share by an initial conversion price of $0.1754 (subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividendsemployees, officers, directors, and similar actions). The Company may redeem the Preferred Stock at any time for an amount equal to $12.50 plus accumulated dividends. The Preferred Stock will bear a dividend of 5% of the purchase price when, as and if declared by the Board of Directorsconsultants of the Company. The Company evaluated the convertible preferred stock under FASB ASC 470-20-30 and determined it containedrestrictions on time-based RSUs generally lapse over a beneficial conversion feature. The intrinsic valueone- to three-year term of the beneficial conversion feature was determined to be $594,641. The beneficial conversion feature was fully amortized and recorded as a deemed dividend. Aggregate cumulative dividends earned during the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled $58,733.

On June 2, 2015, the Company granted 1,250,000 shares of common stock valued at $200,000 and five-year warrants to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.16 per share for services.

On June 2, 2015, the Company granted 800,000 shares of common stock valued at $128,000 and five-year warrants to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.16 per share for services.

On October 26, 2015, the Company agreed with its consultant to issue 41,667 warrants in lieu of 41,667 in stock each month, effective August 15, 2015. Total of 208,332 warrants were issued as of December 31, 2015 of which 124,998 were issued for the return and cancellation of 124,998 previously issued common shares.

In addition to the 2,300,000 common shares described above, during the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued an additional 801,936 common shares for services under consulting and referral agreements valued at $236,626 and 109,855 common shares in connection with a warrant exercise for total proceeds of $43,941.

On October 9, 2015 the Company entered into a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement with accredited investors for the sale of convertible promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of up to $3.75 million and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 37.50 million shares of common stock of the Company. The Company issued notes representing $2.5 million in aggregate principal, and five year warrants exercisable for up to 25.0 million shares of common stock in the aggregate. In addition, upon the election of any investor on or before October 9, 2018, any Investor may purchase an additional note in the principal amount equal to 50% of the principal amount of the Notes purchased by such Investor at previous closings (the “Option Principal Amount”) and an additional warrant with an aggregate exercise price equal to such Investor’s Option Principal Amount. The notes mature three yearscontinuous service from the date of issuance and, until the notes are repaid or converted into shares of the Company’s equity securities, accrue payable-in-kind interest at the rate of 10% per annum.

F-26

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015grant.

 

The notes plus accrued interest will be automatically converted into equity securities iffollowing table summarizes the Company sells equity securities in a single transaction or series of related transactionsRSU activity for cash of at least $2.0 million. At the closing of the equity financing, the notes plus accrued interest will convert into a number of shares of the same class or series of equity securities as are issuedyears ended December 31, 2020 and sold by the Company at 60% of the price per share at which the equity securities are issued and sold in the equity financing. The notes, if not converted, shall be due and payable in full on the maturity date. The notes contain customary events of default provisions. The Company entered into a security agreement with the Investors pursuant to which the Company granted a security interest in all of its assets to the investors as collateral for the Company’s obligations under the notes. The Warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share and expire 60 months following the date of issuance.2019:

Restricted stock units outstanding as of December 31, 2018222,514
Granted206,405
Forfeited/Canceled-
Restricted stock units outstanding as of December 31, 2019428,919
Granted800,695
Settled(116,656)
Forfeited/Canceled(154,580)
Total restricted stock units outstanding at December 31, 2020958,378
Vested restricted stock units at December 31, 2020285,108
Unvested restricted stock units as of December 31, 2020673,270

 

In April 2016, the third quarter of 2020, we granted 260,000 RSUs with performance-based and market-based conditions to our Interim Chief Executive Officer. The performance condition for 105,000 of such RSUs is based on the achievement of Monthly Recurring Revenue (“MRR”) targets. In 2020, we recorded $314,000 in stock-based compensation expense associated with 55,000 RSUs, the performance target for which achievement during the requisite period was deemed probable. The Company issued an aggregate 83,336 shareswill continue to reassess the probability of its common stockachieving the performance conditions in paymentfuture periods and record the appropriate expense if necessary. The market condition for consulting services at a fair value of $14,292.

In April 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 12,834,800 shares of its common stock to Note holdersremaining 155,000 RSUs in settlement of $1,025,000 in convertible notes and $53,123 in accrued interest (Note 8).

In May 2016, the Company sold an aggregate of 11,714,285 shares of common stock of the Company and 1,312,000 warrants to purchaseaward is based on the Company’s common stock to accredited investors for net proceeds of $1,579,082, net of $63,292 of offering costs. The warrants have a term of five years, an exercise price of $0.25 per share and are subject to anti-dilution protection, as defined.

In May 2016, the Company issued 900,525 shares of its common stock upon conversion of 15,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and accrued dividends.

In July 2016, the Company issued an aggregate 124,998 shares of its common stock in payment for consulting services at a fair value of $20,666.

In August 2016, the Company issued an aggregate 41,666 shares of its common stock in payment for consulting services at a fair value of $6,208.

In September 2016, the Company issued an aggregate 41,666 shares of its common stock in payment for consulting services at a fair value of $6,292.

In October 2016, the Company issued an aggregate 41,666 shares of its common stock in payment for consulting services at a fair value of $5,208.

In November 2016, the Company issued an aggregate 41,666 shares of its common stock in payment for consulting services at a fair value of $4,917.

In December 2016, the Company issued an aggregate 41,666 shares of its common stock in payment for consulting services at a fair value of $5,709.

In December 2016, the Company sold an aggregate of 3,928,573 shares of common stock of the Company and 440,000 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock to accredited investors for net proceeds of $550,000. The warrants have a term of five years, an exercise price of $0.25 per share and are subject to anti-dilution protection, as defined.

F-27

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Registration rights

Under the purchase agreement, the Company has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to prepare and file with the SEC registration statement within 60 days of the initial closing date, covering the resale by the investors of any common stock previously issued to the investors, and any common stock into which any convertible promissory notes previously issued to the investors are convertible and any common stock for which the warrants or any warrants previously issued to the investors are exercisable.targets. The Company filed a registration statement on September 30, 2016 and became effective on December 21, 2016. 

Options

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has outstanding options to purchase 26,731,207 and 14,759,914 shares of common stock, respectively.

              Intrinsic 
        Wtd Avg.     Value 
  Number of  Wtd Avg.  Remaining     of 
  Options  Exercise Price  Term  Exercisable  Options 
Outstanding at December 31, 2014  11,434,350  $0.47   3.79   5,635,250  $460,941 
Granted  8,278,880   0.16             
Forfeited/Expired  (4,953,316)  0.00             
Outstanding at December 31, 2015  14,759,914  $0.30   3.61   8,374,294  $235,330 
                     
Granted  12,508,877   0.09   4.87        
Forfeited/Expired  (1,537,584)  0.29            
                     
Outstanding at December 31, 2016  25,731,207  $0.20   3.34   15,091,366  $1,161,244 

On January 15, 2016, the Company granted performance options to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock in aggregate of 6,500,000 to key board member and officers at an exercise price of $0.038 per share for five years. Vesting shall only occur if the closing share price of the Company’s common stock on each of the 20 trading days before and including the end of any performance period is not less than $0.20 per share (market condition). Of the granted options, 5,500,000 include performance conditions (as defined) with both conditions (market and performance) to be met before vesting. All determinations of whether performance goals have been achieved, the number of vested performance options earned by the grantee, and all other matters related to the award of performance options shall be made by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors in its sole discretion.

The estimated fair values of the options with performance and market conditions were determined usingused a Monte Carlo pricing model. Significantsimulation to determine the grant-date fair value for the market-based RSUs. The weighted-average assumptions used in the valuation include expected termMonte-Carlo simulation were as follows: 5-year historical volatility of 136.52%, 5-year risk-free rate of 0.26%, and a performance period of 5 years, expected volatility of 162%, risk free interest rate of 1.46%, and expected dividend yield of 0%.

Nonperformance option grants during the year ended December 31, 2016 were valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Significant assumptions usedyears. The Company recorded $1,506,000 in the valuation include expected term of 1.5 to 3.5 years, expected volatility of 102.00% to 176.77%, risk free interest rate of 0.87% to 1.73%, and expected dividend yield of 0%.

On January 4, 2016, the Company issued 500,000 and 150,000 options, which vest immediately, have an exercise price of $0.038, and expire January 4, 2019 to Carr Bettis and Sean Bradley, respectively; officers of the Company.

On April 15, 2016, the Company issued 49,715 options to Sean Bradley, an officer of the Company, which vest immediately, have an exercise price of $0.179, and expire on April 15, 2019. The value on the grant date of the options was $6,250.

F-28

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

On May 12, 2016, the Company issued 100,000 options, which vest 50% after one year and 4.17% every month thereafter, have an exercise price of $0.177, and expire on May 12, 2021. The value on the grant date of the options was $16,694.

On May 12, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,400,000 options to the Company’s board of directors, which vest 50% immediately and 50% vesting quarterly over 12 months, have an exercise price of $0.177, and expire on May 12, 2021. The value on the grant date of the options was $559,603.

On June 15, 2016, the Company issued 300,000 options, which vest 50% on one year anniversary and 1/24th on monthly anniversary of the date of grant following one year anniversary and expire on June 15, 2021. The value on the grant date of the options was $40,723.

On July 15, 2016, the Company issued 56,375 options to Sean Bradley, an officer of the Company, which vest immediately, have an exercise price of $0.156, and expire on July 15, 2019. The value on the grant date of the options was $6,250.

On October 15, 2016, the Company issued 61,599 options to Sean Bradley, an officer of the Company, which vest immediately, have an exercise price of $0.121, and expire on October 15, 2019. The value on the grant date of the options was $5,209.

On December 2, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,391,188 options, which vest 50% from January 1, 2017 through December 1, 2017; 25% from January 1, 2018 through December 1, 2018 and 25% from January 1, 2019 through December 1, 2019, have an exercise price of $0.121, and expire on December 2, 2021. The value on the grant date of the options was $150,875.

For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, total stockstock-based compensation expense related to the options totaled $864,024 and $823,478, respectively.

The outstanding unamortized stock compensation expense related to options was $482,153 (which will be recognized through December 2019) and $406,157 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.these market-based RSUs in 2020.

 

Warrants

Below is a table summarizing the Company’s outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

           Intrinsic 
        Wtd Avg.  Value 
  Number of  Wtd Avg.  Remaining  of 
  Warrants  Exercise Price  Term  Warrants 
Outstanding at December 31, 2014  16,527,989  $0.46   3.69  $309,821 
Granted  28,913,020   0.11         
Exercised  (109,855)  0.40         
Forfeited  (2,084,296)  0.43         
Outstanding at December 31, 2015  43,246,858  $0.22   4.15  $1,167 
Granted  21,681,264   0.03   4.87    
Forfeited/Expired  (1,495,081)  0.48        
                 
Outstanding at December 31, 2016  63,433,041  $0.15   3.55  $3,662,610 

F-29

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

The warrant grants during the year ended December 31, 2016 were valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Significant assumptions used in the valuation include expected term of 1.5 to 2.5 years, expected volatility of 166.74% to 178.98%, risk free interest rate of 0.71% to 1.08%, and expected dividend yield of 0%.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,575,954 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise prices of $0.038 to $0.179 per share vested immediately for services. The fair value on the grant date of the warrants was $150,500. Of the 1,575,954 warrants issued, 1,492,620 warrants were issued to Carr Bettis, an officer of the Company.

In April 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 18,353,310 warrants to acquire its common stock in settlement of $1,541,678 convertible notes and accrued interest. The warrants issued to Anthion are exercisable at $0.001 per share for five years from the date of issuance.

The Company determined that the estimated fair value of the 18,353,310 warrants of $3,205,959 exceeded the settlement of $1,541,678 of convertible notes and accrued interest and accordingly recorded a loss of settlement of debt of $1,664,281 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company used the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model to estimate the fair value of the warrants at settlement with the following assumptions: the price of the Company stock of $0.175, volatility was estimated to be 178%, the risk free rate of 1.24% and the remaining term was 5 years.

In May 2016, the Company issued 1,312,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.25 in connection with the sale of Common Stock. The five year warrants also contain a provision that the warrant exercise price will automatically be adjusted for any common stock equity issuances at less than $0.25 per share.

In December 2016, the Company issued 440,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.25 in connection with the sale of Common Stock. The five year warrants also contain a provision that the warrant exercise price will automatically be adjusted for any common stock equity issuances at less than $0.25 per share.

For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has incurred warrant-based expense of $221,621 and $510,436, respectively. The outstanding unamortized stock compensation expense related to warrants was $47,685 (which will be recognized through March 2018) and $106,852 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Restricted stock units (“RSU”)

 

The following table summarizes the restricted stockwarrant activity for the two years ended December 31, 2015:2020 and 2019:

 

Restricted shares issued as of January 1, 2015-
Granted-
Total Restricted Shares Issued at December 31, 2015-
Granted1,252,620
Total Restricted Shares Issued at December 31, 20161,252,620
Vested at December 31, 2016-
Unvested restricted shares as of December 31, 20151,252,620
        Weighted  Intrinsic 
     Weighted  Average  Value 
  Number of  Average  Remaining  of 
  Warrants  Exercise Price  Term  Warrants 
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  1,781,715  $4.2   2.23  $8,930,000 
Granted  146,667   6.00   0.62     
Exercised  (1,279,550)  1.85         
Forfeited/Expired  (224,124)  5.33         
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  424,708   5.31   0.82   189,000 
Granted  -   -         
Exercised  (321,467)  4.77         
Forfeited/Expired  (22,188)  9.59         
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  81,053  $6.25   0.94  $1,587,000 

 

In December 7, 2016,August 2019, the Company granted 602,620 RSUs for accrued and unpaid compensation fornegotiated with holders of certain warrants to purchase the period from July 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016Company’s common stock with respect to a transaction in the amount of $72,917 The RSUs vest upon the satisfaction of both of the following conditions: (i) Officer remains in service towhich the Company continuouslyand the holders agreed to amend certain warrant agreements to provide that, from the date of amendment through August 16, 2019, the exercise price was reduced from $2.50 to $1.63 per share for warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,194,990 shares and until June 30, 2017,from $6.25 to $4.07 per share for warrants to purchase an aggregate of 85,719 shares, provided that any exercise during such period was in full and (ii)the exercise price was paid in cash. In August 2019, an aggregate of 1,212,136 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock were exercised for net proceeds of $2,115,000.

In the third quarter of 2020, the Company undergoesreceived $880,000 in cash in connection with the exercise of 146,667 stock warrants by a change of control during the seven-year term of the award.related party. Refer to Note 6 – Debt and Note 8 – Related Party Transactions for additional information on these warrants.

 

F-30

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 20162020 AND 20152019

 

The Board also approved the grant to an aggregate of 650,000 RSUs to officers with a seven-year term representing the right to receive, subject to the terms and upon the conditions of the RSU, 650,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, with such number of shares to be reduced by the number of shares, if any, that are awarded to Dr. Bettis in connection with the Performance Option Unit Agreement granted Dr. Bettis in January 2016 under the 2016 Plan. These RSU is also subject the following conditions: (i) Officer remains in service to the Company continuously through and until June 30, 2017, and (ii) the Company undergoes a change of control during the seven-year term of the award. The fair value of the 650,000 RSUs of $87,750 was unrecognized at December 31, 2016 due to the performance condition not met.

In connection with the issuance of the above described RSUs as payment for accrued compensation, the Company reclassified to equity the outstanding salary accrual of $72,917 during the year ended December 31, 2016.

NOTE 11 — INCOME TAXES

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, federal and state income tax expense totaled zero.

 

The Company accountshas net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income. As of December 31, 2020, net operating loss carry forwards totaled $42,636,000 and will expire at various dates through 2040. Future tax benefits for income taxes under ASC 740, “Income Taxes”. Temporary differencesthese net operating loss carryforwards are differences betweenrecognized to the extent that realization of these benefits is considered more likely than not. To the extent that the Company will not realize a future tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Abenefit, a valuation allowance is recorded when the ultimate realization of a deferred tax as The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented below:established.

  December 31,  December 31, 
Deferred tax assets: 2016  2015 
       
Net operating loss carry forwards $7,558,530  $6,373,434 
Less valuation allowance  (7,558,530)  (6,373,434)
Net deferred tax asset $0  $0 

  

At this time, the Company is unable to determine if it will be able to benefit from its deferred tax asset. There are limitations on the utilization of net operating loss carry forwards,carryforwards, including a requirement that losses be offset against future taxable income, if any. In addition, there are limitations imposed by certain transactions, which are deemed to be ownership changes. Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been established for the entireour net deferred tax asset. The approximate net operating loss carry forwardasset was $22,230,971 and $18,745,343zero as of December 31, 20162020 and 2015, respectively2019 as the Company established a full valuation allowance of $ 13,304,000 and will start$7,758,000, respectively.

Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 consist of the following:

  December 31, 
(in thousands) 2020  2019 
Deferred tax assets:        
Intangible assets $269  $- 
Bad debt expense  21   - 
Accrued compensation expense  83   - 
Deferred revenue and costs  2   - 
Stock-based compensation  1,494   - 
Operating lease liability  193   - 
State NOL carryforwards  2,516   1,380 
Federal NOL carryforwards  8,954   6,378 
Total Deferred Tax Assets  13,532   7,758 
Valuation allowance  (13,304)  (7,758)
Net deferred tax assets  228   - 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Property and equipment  (62)  - 
Right of use assets  (166)  - 
Total deferred tax liabilities  (228)  - 
Net deferred tax asset (liability) $-  $- 

The Company is subject to expireU.S. federal income tax as well as income taxes in 2030.multiple state and local jurisdictions. The Company’sCompany has concluded all U.S. federal tax returnmatters for years through December 31, 2016. All material state and local income tax matters have been concluded for years through December 31, 2015. The Company is no longer subject to IRS examination for the tax years ended on or before December 31, 2016; however, carryforward losses that were generated through the tax year 2013, 2014ended December 31, 2016 may still be adjusted by the IRS if they are used in a future period. The Company had no reserve for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2020 and 2015 are open to IRS inspection.2019.

 

NOTE 12 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Employee options/warrantsWe have evaluated subsequent events occurring after December 31, 2020 and based on our evaluation we did not identify any events that would have required recognition or disclosure in these financial statements, except for the following.

 

On January 3, 2017,February 11, 2021, we entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with B. Riley Securities, Inc. (“Agent”) under which the Company granted 100,000 optionsmay offer and sell, from time to an employee as compensation for services rendered. The options are exercisabletime at $0.159 for five years with 50% vesting on January 3, 2018 and 50% vesting monthly beginning on first year anniversary over the next 24 months. The exercise price was determined using the 10-day average closing price beginning with the closing price on January 3, 2017.

On January 14, 2017, the Company issued 250,000 warrants to a consultant as compensation for services rendered. The warrants are exercisable at $0.12 for three five years, vesting immediately.

On March 10, 2017, the Company granted 100,000 options to an employee as compensation for services rendered. The options are exercisable at $0.145 for five years with 50% vesting on January 16, 2018 and 50% vesting monthly beginning on first year anniversary over the next 24 months. The exercise price was determined using the 10-day average closing price beginning with the closing price on February 24, 2017.

F-31

AUDIOEYE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Common stock

In January 2017, the Company issued 41,666its sole discretion, shares of its common stock for consulting services rendered valued at $6,625.

In January 2017,to or through the CompanyAgent as its sales agent, having an aggregate offering price of up to $30,000,000. As of March 8, 2021, we had sold 357,143a total of 378,108 shares of common stock under this Sales Agreement for total proceeds of approximately $14.1 million, net of estimated transaction costs.

In the first quarter of 2021, our Interim Chief Executive Officer vested in 55,000 RSUs with market conditions based on the Company’s stock price targets. In connection with the settlement of these RSUs, the Company and 40,000 warrants to purchasepaid $373,000 in taxes on behalf of our Interim Chief Executive Officer in exchange for the surrender of 15,651 shares of the Company’s common stock to an accredited investor for net proceeds of $50,000. The warrants have a term of five years, an exercise price of $0.25 per share and are subject to anti-dilution protection, as defined.

In February 2017, the Company issued 41,666 shares of its common stock for consulting services rendered valued at $5,333

In March 2017, the Company issued 41,666 shares of its common stock for consulting services rendered valued at $5,917.

Restricted stock units (“RSU”)

In February 23, 2017, the Company granted 402,297 RSUs for accrued and unpaid compensation for the period from December 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 in the amount of $58,333 The RSUs vest upon the satisfaction of both of the following conditions: (i) Officer remains in service to the Company continuously through and until June 30, 2017, and (ii) the Company undergoes a change of control during the seven-year term of the award.stock.

 

F-32