Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. FROM THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _____ TO _______.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017

2020

Commission file number 000-53239

 

 

 

Cavitation Technologies, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

Nevada 20-4907818
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

10019 CANOGA AVENUE, CHATSWORTH, CALIFORNIA  91311
(Address, including Zip Code, of Principal Executive Offices)

(818) 718-0905
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

NONE

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

Title of Each Class: Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value Over the Counter (Bulletin Board)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES ¨    NO x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES ¨    NO x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x    NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x    NO ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K, or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨Accelerated filer ¨Non-accelerated filerx¨Smaller reporting company x
  

(Do not check if a

smaller reporting company)

Emerging growth company ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES ¨    NO x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or of the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $6,365,938$5,077,000 as of December 31, 20162019 based on the closing price of $0.04$0.03 per share and 159,148,456169,226,931 non-affiliate shares outstanding.

The registrant had 196,797,906196,997,906 shares of common stock outstanding on October 13, 2017.5, 2020.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

None

 

 

 

CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 20172020
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 Page
PART I1
Item 1. Business41
Item 1A. Risk Factors7
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments7
Item 2. Properties7
Item 3. Legal Proceedings7
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures7
  
PART II8
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities8
Item 6. Selected Financial Data89
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations89
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk13
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data14
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure2934
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures2934
Item 9B. Other Information3035
  
PART III36
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance3136
Item 11. Executive Compensation3237
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters3439
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence3540
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services3540
  
PART IV42
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules3642
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary3743
  
Signatures3844

 

 2i 

 

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This annual report on Form 10-K and the exhibits attached hereto contain “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements concern our anticipated results and developments in our operations in future periods, planned exploration and development of our properties, plans related to our business and matters that may occur in the future. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management. We use words like “expects,” “believes,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “targets,” “projects” or “estimates” in this annual report. When used, these words and other, similar words and phrases or statements that an event, action or result “will,” “may,” “could,” or “should” result, occur, be taken or be achieved, identify “forward-looking” statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown, and assumptions.

 

Management has included projections and estimates in this annual report, which are based primarily on management’s experience in the industry, assessments of our results of operations, discussions and negotiations with third parties and a review of information filed by our competitors with the Securities and Exchange Commission or otherwise publicly available. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, except as required by law. We qualify all of the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report by the foregoing cautionary statements.

 

 3ii 

 

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

 

Cavitation Technologies, Inc. (referred to herein, unless otherwise indicated, as “the Company,” “CTi,” “we,” “us,” and “our”) is a Nevada corporation originally incorporated under the name Bio Energy, Inc. We are a process and product development firm that has developed, patented, and commercialized environmentally friendly technology basedtechnology-based systems that are designed to serve large, growing, global markets such as vegetable oil refining, renewable fuels, water treatment, wines and spirits enhancement, algae oil extraction, water-oil emulsions and crude oil yield improvement. Our systems are designed to process industrial liquids at a reduced processing time, lower operating cost, improved yield while operating in environmentally friendly manner. We have developed,Our patented and commercialized our proprietary technology that can be used in multiple liquid processing applications. Our patentedNano Reactor® isand LPN are the critical componentcomponents of our CTibusiness and we have generated all of our revenue while utilizing these components.

Nano Neutralization® SystemCovid-19

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared coronavirus COVID-19 a global pandemic. This contagious disease outbreak, which has been showncontinued to reducespread, has adversely affected workforces, customers, economies, and financial markets globally. It has also disrupted the normal operations of many businesses. This outbreak could decrease spending, adversely affect demand for the Company’s products, and harm the Company’s business and results of operations. During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company believes the COVID-19 pandemic did not materially impact its operating costsresults due to the nature of the Company’s business and increase yieldsits operations. The Company has not observed any impairments of its assets or a significant change in refining vegetable oils.the fair value of its assets due to the COVID-19 pandemic. At this time, it is not possible for the Company to predict the duration or magnitude of the adverse results of the outbreak and its effects on the Company’s business or results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.

Vegetable Oil Refining

 

Our first commercial application for our technology has been theCTi Nano Neutralization® Systemwhich has been utilized to improve edible vegetable oil refining process. Our environmentally friendly process has been shown to reduce refining costs, increase oil yield, and limit the amount of chemical additives used in chemical refining of vegetables oils. This patented process (US Patent # 7,762,715 and # 8,042,989) is designed to be incorporated into new and existing soybean, rapeseed, canola and canolapalm vegetable oil chemical refineries.

 

Our first pilot test of ourCTi NANO NeutralizationNeutralization® System was conducted in 2010 at Carolina Soya, a 200-metric ton/day crude soy oil refining plant in Estill, South Carolina. Our second system, which became operational in fiscal 2011, has been continuously utilized since 2011 at the plant that processes approximately 450 metric tons per day of soy oil. Further, we have successfully shipped over 3050 systems both domestically and abroad.internationally. We also continuously focus on developing additional Nano Reactor® applications and managing the intellectual property issues associated with new processes and applications.

 

The global demand forconsumption of vegetable oils has grown consistently at a rate of about 5.5%5.3% p.a. from 84.590.5 million metric tons in 19992001 to over 175approximately 204 million metric tons in 2015-20162019-2020, (https://www.statista.com/statistics/263937/vegetable-oils-global-consumption/). It is also a highly competitive commodity market in which the lowest-cost producer has the advantage.

 

Desmet Ballestra Agreement

 

On May 14, 2012 we signed a three-year globalR and D,&D, Marketing and Technology License Agreementwith Desmet Ballestra Group s.a. (Desmet), a Belgian company that is actively marketing theNANO NeutralizationNeutralization® System, the key component of which is our Nano Reactor® to soybean and other vegetable oil refiners. The Agreement provided Desmet (licensee) a limited, exclusive license and right to develop, design and supply ourNANO NeutralizationNeutralization® System which incorporates Nano Reactor® devices on a global basis tools and fats and oleo chemical applications Desmet provided, under certain conditions, limited monthly advance payments of $125,000 against future sales to us through May 2015. This Agreement was terminated in May 2015.applications.

 

On January 22, 2016, we signed a similar three-year agreement with Desmet effective August 1, 2015.2015 that expired on August 1, 2018. As part of the agreement, Desmet iswas to provide, under certain conditions, limited monthly advance payments of $50,000 that were applied against future sales to us. The agreement expires in Augustgross profit share from reactor sales.

On October 1, 2018, or may be terminated by Desmet every August 1 should Desmet and its affiliates failthe Company executed a new three year License Agreement with essentially the same terms with the January 2016 agreement. As part of the agreement, Desmet agreed to convert a minimumprovide us monthly advances of sixNANO Neutralization Systems$50,000 through October 1, 2022 to sold status during the period of June 1 to May 31. The agreement may also be terminated in case we were to lose our rights under the patents and patent applications being used in ourCTi NANO Neutralization System.applied against gross profit share from future sales.

1

 

Desmet, together with its affiliates, is a global engineering and equipment supply firm engaged in the development, design and supply of process equipment for oils and fats processing facilities including vegetable oil refining, biofuel, oleo chemical, seed crushing, surfactant and detergent markets. Desmet supplies these markets with services based on the latest globally sourced technologies. Desmet has relationships with major refiners globally A significant portion of global vegetable oil refineries include major refiners such as Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill, Inc. and Bunge Limited. Desmet has more than 40 sales representatives selling in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia. Since its founding in 1946, Desmet reports that it has built a global network that includes 1,300 employees, 17 global and 8 representative offices, and more than 5,7006,000 lines in a variety of applications. Desmet operates a separate division for each of the above markets and the Desmet Oils & Fats division has supplied small and large plants to approximately 1,7001,900 oil millers in 150 countries, covering over 6,0006300 process sections. We have developed a relationship with the North American arm of Desmet which operates in each of these markets and provides us with other potential opportunities such as palm oil refining.

 

4

We andAlong with Desmet, we have workedbeen working together to determine theaccelerate appropriate sales approachgoals and installation process. Our CTi Nano Neutralization SystemNeutralization® Systems is designed to be used as an add-on process to an existing neutralization system within soybean and other vegetable oil refineries. Desmet is now focusedDesmet’s focus has been on marketingour CTi’sCTi Nano Neutralization® Systems System to vegetable oil refiners to help them increase profits through cost savings and improved oil yields. Desmet purchases our CTi Nano Neutralization ReactorNeutralization® Systems from us and installs them at the refinery as part of an integrated neutralization system. Based on successful commercial implementations, Desmet guarantees minimum economic benefits to a facility that installs ourCTi Nano Neutralization® Systems. We are therefore substantially dependent on Desmet to identify prospects, complete sales contracts, install the system and manage relationships with end-users.

Additionally, in fiscal 2017 Desmet installed our first Nano Reactor at a bio-diesel production plant in South America. Bio-diesel industry has been under pricing pressure for a considerable period of time and slow to adopt to newer technologies. We are continuously working with Desmet pursuing additional sales opportunities in Asia and South America, however, the acceptance of our technology has been slow and there were no sales generated in our Fiscal 2020.

 

GEA Westfalia Agreement

 

In August 2012, we entered into a Technology and Licensing Agreement with the GEA Group AG - Westfalia Separator Group (“GEA”) pursuant to which the companies agreed to jointly develop and patent new applications of our core technologies. As part of the Agreement, GEA Westfalia willwas to assemble a complete commercial test system comprising Nano Reactors®. This Agreement was terminated in January 2017.

 

In January 2017 we have entered into a new three-year global technology license, R&D and marketing agreement with respect toGEA expiring on January 1, 2020, covering our patented Nano ReactorReactors® technology, processes and applications. Under the newthis agreement, GEA has been granted a worldwide exclusive license to integrate our patented technology into water treatment application, milk and juice pasteurization, and certain food related processes. The license agreement between us and GEA has a three-year term and providesprovided for the payment of $300,000 per year in advanced license fees to us. As of June 30, 2017,2020, the Company has not received any advancesapproximately $900,000 from GEA or recorded any revenues pursuant tounder this agreement.

 

Our agreement with GEA Westfalia Separator manufactures filtrationhas expired on January 1, 2020 and equipment such as separators, clarifiers, decantersboth companies anticipate to negotiate a new agreement toward the end of 2020 or in early 2021.

Enviro Watertek, LLC

In April 2019, we have entered into a licensing and membrane filtration systems.service contract agreement with Enviro Watertek, LLC (“EW”). This equipment is usedagreement covers our first commercial entrance into industrial treatment of produced and frac water. Fracking industry has seen a significant growth over the past ten years, reaching daily water consumption volume of over 58 million barrels per day. Our newly designed Low Pressure Nano Reactor (LPN) was specifically developed to be integrated into produced water treatment system along with our proprietary chemical formulations, and has depicted measurable and quantifiable advantages over industry standard processes and equipment. Our agreement with EW provides for the purification of suspensions, the separation of fluid mixtures with simultaneous removal of solids, extraction and concentration or removal of liquids from solids. The technological dominance of the company issales on LPN plus recurring revenue stream based on over one hundred fifteen yearsprocessing of innovation, first-class engineering solutionsproduced and comprehensive processing capabilities. The company was foundedfrac water volumes and utilization. Our agreement with EW has a fifteen-year term.

We sold our first LPN system in 1893the third quarter of our fiscal 2019, while generating additional LPNsales and recurring revenue in Oelde, Germany,our fiscal 2020. In March 2020, global pandemic of COVID-19 has taken an unexpected negative impact on the oil and since 1994gas industry worldwide, and has beenconsequently impaired our ability to rapidly accelerate LPN™ sales and recurring revenue stream. While the industry has gone through a part of the GEA Group AG and is amajor overhaul, we are starting to see business unit within the GEA Mechanical Equipment segment. In 1950, Westfalia Separator establishedopportunities evolving in US and Canadian corporationsexpect to serve as sales and marketing arms to competere-start the production in the burgeoning North American market for centrifuges. GEA isfourth quarter of 2020.

2

Alchemy Beverages, Inc

In fiscal 2014, Roman Gordon, one of the largest suppliers for the food processing industryour shareholders and a wide range of process industries that generated consolidated revenues of approximately EUR 4.6 billionformer officer, formed a company, Cameo USA LLC (Cameo). Since its formation, Cameo has had no revenue, no operations, and has had no assets or liabilities. On June 4, 2018, Mr. Gordon contributed his 100% interest in 2015.Cameo to Cavitation Technologies, Inc. As an international technology group, GEA focuses on process technology and components for sophisticated production processes in various end-user markets. The Group generates more than 70 percent of its revenueMr. Gordon had no basis in the food sector that enjoys long-term sustainable growth. Asvaluation of December 31, 2016,his investment in Cameo, there was no value assigned to the Company employed about 17,000 people worldwide. GEA is a market and technology leader in its business areas. GEA is listed on the German MDAX (G1A, WKN 660 200)contribution of Cameo.

On June 29, 2018, we agreed to license Cameo to Alchemy Beverages Inc. (“ABI”). In addition, GEAs sharewe have agreed to provide certain licensing rights related to our miniature low pressure nano-reactor (MLPN) to be used in developing and manufacturing of small home appliances to enhance alcoholic beverages. In consideration for these ABI has agreed to issue 19.9% of ABI’s outstanding common shares to us (limited to 20 million shares of ABI). ABI is a constituentprivate company and in the business of producing and selling alcoholic beverages, equipment, and home appliances. Prior to this agreement, ABI was independent of CTI and had no relation to us nor to our management.

Pursuant to the licensing agreements, ABI will have the exclusive global marketing and distribution rights of Cameo and our patented and patent pending technologies for the processing of alcoholic beverages. We have agreed to assist in the installation and maintenance of the MSCI Global Sustainability Indexes.MLPN to ABI and will receive royalty payments ranging from 1% to 3% on all net revenues, as defined in our license agreement for the life of the applicable patents. In addition, we will receive leasing, consulting, and manufacturing fees as defined in the licensing agreement.

To date, ABI hasn’t generated any sales under Cameo brand. Over the last 18 months, our company and ABI have developed a small table top home appliance unit Barmuze® utilizing MLPN , allowing consumers to experience a new way of enjoying wines and spirits, utilizing CTi’s patented and patent pending technologies to molecularly restructure alcohol, convert harsh acids to pleasant tasting esters, and reduce levels of certain impurities commonly present in alcohol..

On February 26, 2019 we have filed an application with U.S. Patent office, U.S. Patent Application No. 16/286,309  “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PURIFICATION OF DRINKING WATER, ETHANOL AND ALCOHOL BEVERAGES OF IMPURITIES” and on October 24, 2018, U.S. Patent Application No. 16/169,644 “METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PRODUCING OF HIGH QUALITY ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES”. During fiscal 2020, we have received approval for numerous claims in both applications, protecting our technology and processing rights, meanwhile expanding our broad portfolio of patents.

As of June 30, 2020 and the date of this report, there were no sales or royalties generated pertaining to our agreement with Alchemy Beverages, Inc. The investment in ABI has no value assigned to it, which approximates its fair value.

 

Customers Dependence

 

We continue to sell our CTi industrial capacity Nano Reactor® and Nano Reactor® Systems and technology only to two licensees,Neutralization® System through our strategic partners Desmet and GEA and they are responsible for installing and servicing the systems. Allmost of our revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 and 20162020, was derived from Desmet and GEA.

We have generated certain revenue pertaining to our licensing agreement with EW, however, in the second half of our fiscal 2020 we had no sales of productsLPN due to Desmet.COVID-19 that has significantly impacted oil production in US. Meanwhile, we are starting to see oil and gas industry early stage recovery and foresee a great opportunity for our technology providing a significant upside potential both at the point of sale and recurring revenue stream.

 

Sources and availability of raw materials and the names of principal suppliers

 

We have historically sourced reactor components from various domestic and international suppliers. We do not have any long-term contracts, agreements, or commitments with any supplier. We believe it would take approximately 30 days to find a new supplier, if necessary.

3

 

Competition

 

Our competitors who sell equipment and engineering services for the vegetable oil refining business are a myriad of companies both large and small that provide equipment and technology to oil refiners. These include known companies that have longer operating histories, more experience, and stronger financial capabilities. Competitors include Alfa Laval, and Crown Iron Works as well as many firms that provide advice and services to small and regional firms. In addition, Arisdyne Systems, a designer of cavitation devices, is marketing a system using similar technology. The vegetable oil refining business is a highly competitive commodity market in which where the lowest-cost producer has the advantage. We intend to compete by offering solutions that help our clients remain or become a low-cost producer. Because the industry in which we compete has had limited new technology introduced in the last 50 years, we believe ourCTi Nano Neutralization® Systems provide a unique opportunity for refiners to increase margins. We seek to differentiate ourselves by offering solutions based on our proprietary and patented designs, processes, and applications to help our clients described in our issued and patent pending applications. We compete by offering solutions that we believe can reduce operating expenses and increase oil yield vs currently applied technologiestechnologies.

 

5

In addition, our competitors in produced and frac water treatment application range from local service providers to multi-national global corporations with considerable financial resources, engineering expertise, established and proven technologies. We believe that LPN™ is a conceptually new technology that has not been introduced in the field of water treatment applications up to now. LPN™ has demonstrated exceptional results in treating produced and frac water commercially, significantly reducing the usage of hazards chemicals during the process, meanwhile, achieving desirable water quality for industrial re-use or disposal.

 

Patents

 

Our Cavitation Generator patent was issued during fiscal 2011. In addition, we have a patent for our Multi-Stage Cavitation Device Nano Reactor® that was issued on October 25, 2011. In the fiscal 2014 we received approvals for another apparatus patent and 2 additional process patents in the US. During fiscal years 2015 and 2016, we also received approvals in the US for another 5As of June 30, 2020, our portfolio of patents for various processes. In fiscal year 2017, we received approvals in the US for 3 process patents and approval for a 4th process patent in fiscal year 2018.

In international applications, we received 1 patent approval for a process patent in Singapore in fiscal year 2016. In fiscal year 2017, we received patent approvals for process patents in Mexico and Canada.

We also have 3 US and 7 international patent applications pending that apply to the design of our reactor and the processes involving use of the same. We filed a number of process patent applications incorporating these patented devices for processing fluids in vegetable oil refining, waste water treatment, algae oil extraction, and alcoholic beverage enhancement. We received comments from the United States Patent and Trademark Office with regards to our process for increasing bioalcohol yield from biomass and have responded. We also received comments in multiples of our international applications and are responding to those as well. There is no assurance that our patents pending will be ultimately issued.

We believe our technology can be applied to other liquid processing industries where there is a need to solve environmental problems, reduce operating costs, and/or improve quality and yield. Ourincluded 19 issued patents allowed patents, and pending applications support potential uses of the Company’s proprietary technology in markets that include, but are not limited to, vegetable oils refining, renewable fuel production, alcoholic beverage enhancement, water purification, and algae oil extraction. In addition, we believe our proprietary technology may also be applied to fuel mixing and crude oil refining. During fiscal 2011, we received the “CE Marking” certification which allows us to market our systems in the European Union. Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain patents, maintain trade secrets, and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others both in the United States and other countries. There12 issued patents internationally. Our patents cover multiple process and applications of our technology in vegetable oil refining, production of biodiesel, treatment of process and industrial water, upgrade of hydrocarbons and enhancing of alcoholic beverages. We continuously develop new technologies and applications, as we have filed new patent applications for Low Pressure Nano-Reactors LPN. LPN is a highly efficient homogenizer and emulsifier that can be no assurances that patents issuedutilized in multiple fluids processing applications. Recently, we have filed a patent application for a small home appliance. This new product is designed directly with consumer in mind and the first step for our company to us will not be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, or thatintroduce our technology outside of the rights granted hereunder will provide proprietary protection or competitive advantage to us. industrial sector where we typically sell our products.

Issued

USCavitation Generator7,762,715
USMulti-Stage Cavitation Device8,042,989
USProcess for Producing Biodiesel Through Lower Molecular Weight Alcohol-Targeted Cavitation8,603,198
USHigh-Throughput Cavitation and Electro Coagulation Apparatus8,673,129
USExtraction of Oil from Algae by Hydrodynamic Cavitation for Biodiesel Production8,709,750
USFlow-Through Cavitation-Assisted Rapid Modification of Crude Oil8,894,273
USMethod for Cavitation-Assisted Refining, Degumming and Dewaxing of Oil and Fat8,911,808
USProcess to Remove Impurities from Triacylglycerol Oil8,945,644
USProcess for Producing Biodiesel Through Lower Molecular Weight Alcohol-Targeted Cavitation8,981,135
USProcess for Removing Waxes and Phospholipids from Vegetable Oils and Increasing Production of Food Grade Lecithin Therefrom9,357,790

4

USMethod and Flow Through Hydrodynamic Cavitational Apparatus for Alterations of Beverages9,474,301
USMethod for Cavitation-Assisted Refining, Degumming and Dewaxing of Oil and Fat9,481,853
USProcess for Extracting Carbohydrates from Biomass and Converting the Carbohydrates into Biofuels9,611,496
USFlow-Through Cavitation-Assisted Rapid Modification of Crude Oil9,719,025
USProcesses for Increasing Bioalcohol Yield from Biomass9,944,964
USProcesses for Increasing Bioalcohol Yield from Biomass9,988,651
USProcesses for Extracting Carbohydrates from Biomass and Converting the Carbohydrates into Biofuels10.093.953
USVariable Flow Through Cavitation Device10,507,442
USSystem and Method for Purification of Drinking Water, Ethanol and Alcohol Beverages of Impurities10,781,113
Int’lProcess to Remove Impurities from Triacylglycerol OilAr AR083000B1
Int’lCavitation GeneratorBr - PI0919602-1
Int’lProcess to Remove Impurities from Triacylglycerol OilCa - 2,809,236
Int’lProcess to Remove Impurities from Triacylglycerol OilMalaysia MY164311A
Int’lProcess to Remove Impurities from Triacylglycerol OilMexico - MX/E/2013/015504
Int’lProcess to Remove Impurities from Triacylglycerol OilSingapore P187241
Int’lProcess to Remove Impurities from Triacylglycerol OilMexico - MX/a/2016/006201
Int’lProcess to Remove Impurities from Triacylglycerol OilEU 10 857 392.4
Int’lMethod for Cavitation-Assisted Refining, Degumming and Dewaxing of Oil and FatBr PI0919602-1
Int’lProcess to Remove Impurities from Triacylglycerol OilFr E 2 616 156
Int’lProcess to Remove Impurities from Triacylglycerol OilGr 2 616 156
Int’lProcess to Remove Impurities from Triacylglycerol OilUK 2 616 156

5

Patent Pending

USVariable Flow Through Cavitation Device
USSystem and Method for Purification of Drinking Water, Ethanol and Alcohol Beverages of Impurities
USMethod and Device for Producing of High Quality Alcoholic Beverages
USTabletop Beverage Cavitation Device
USMethod for Purification of Drinking Water, Ethanol and Alcohol Beverages of Impurities
USProcess for Increasing Plant Protein Yield from Biomass
BrProcess to Remove Impurities from Triacylglycerol Oil
EuSystem and Method for Purification of Drinking Water, Ethanol and Alcohol Beverages of Impurities
BrProcess to Remove Impurities from Triacylglycerol Oil

We plan to continue to invest in R&Dresearch and development and file for new and improved patents.

 

Royalty Agreements

 

On July 1, 2008, our wholly owned subsidiary entered into Patent Assignment Agreements with two parties, our President as well as our former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) who currently serves as our Technology Senior Manager, where certain devices and methods involved in theour hydrodynamic cavitation processes invented by the President and former CEO/current Technology Senior Manager have been assigned to the subsidiary. In exchange, that subsidiary agreed to pay a royalty of 5% of gross revenues to each of the President and former CEO/current Technology Senior Manager for licensing of the technology and leasing of the related equipment embodying the technology. These agreements were subsequently assumed by us on May 13, 2010 from our subsidiary. Our former CEO/current Technology Senior Manager and President both waived their rights to receive royalty payments that have accrued, or that may accrue, on any gross revenue generated through June 30, 2017.2020.

 

On April 30, 2008 and as amended on November 22, 2010, our wholly owned subsidiary entered into an employment agreement with its former Director of Chemical and Analytical Department (the “Inventor”) to pay, in the first year, an amount equal to 5% of actual gross revenue received by us on any patent for which the Inventor was a legally named inventor, and, in each subsequent year, 3% of actual gross revenue received by us on any such patent. Since entering into that employment agreement, and during the term of this employment agreement, we have not received any revenue on any patents for which the Inventor was a legally named inventor.

 

Governmental Approval and Regulations and Environmental Compliance

 

Due to the nature of our products, we have incurred no costs with respect to environmental compliance with federal, state, and local laws. To our knowledge, our products do not require governmental approval, and we do not foresee that governmental regulations will have a material impact on our business.

 

6

Employees

 

OnAs of June 30, 20172020 we had fourfive full-time employees and had engaged several consultants and independent contractors over the past year. Members of our staff and technical team are comprised of experienced professionals who are chemists, civil, chemical, and mechanical engineers with expertise in hydrodynamic cavitation, nano technology and water treatment. These individuals hold degrees in Civil, Chemical, and Mechanical Engineering.

 

6

Research and Development Expenditures

 

During the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we spent $27,105$19,000 and $29,371$25,000, respectively, on research and development activities.

 

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

 

Not applicable for smaller reporting companies.

 

ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

 

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

 

Our corporate headquarter is located in Chatsworth, California, with an area of approximately 5,000 square foot facility, which includes office space and an area to conduct research and development.  Our lease agreement for this space will end onin February 1, 2018.2025.  Our monthly rent payments approximate $5,000.$6,000 up to $7,000 over the term of the lease. We do not anticipate any material difficulties with the renewal of our rental agreement when it expires or in securing replacement facilities on commercially reasonable terms.

 

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

We areThe Company may be involved in certain legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of ourits business. As of June 30, 2017, we were a party to legal proceedings related to claims for payment of unpaid wages that are currently accrued for in our financial statements and are described in more detail below. Except for income tax contingencies, we recordthe Company records accruals for contingencies to the extent that management concludes that the occurrence is probable and that the related amounts of loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal expenses associated with the contingency are expensed as incurred. Material legal proceedings that are currently pending are as follows:

 

On September 5, 2013, a former employee who was also a former Director (Plaintiff) filed an administrative Complaint for approximately $179,000 in unpaid wages, plus penalties and interest, with the California Labor Commissioner’s Office (CLCO).  In January 2016, the CLCO ruled in favorThe Company is not aware of us and dismissed the case. As a result of this ruling, our obligation to the former employee and former Director only amounted to approximately $131,000 which was accrued in prior periods and included as part of Accrued Payroll and payroll taxes due to officers in the accompanying balance sheet.any pending litigation.

In February 2016, the same former employee and who is also a former Director has now appealed this ruling to the Los Angeles County Superior Court.  While we believe our case to be strong, no assurance can be given that we will prevail on appeal. In addition to defending ourselves, we also filed a cross-complaint against this former employee and Director for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty as a Director.

In October 2017, the Company settled the lawsuit with the Plaintiff for $30,000. Upon payment of the settlement amount, the Complaint and Cross-complaint between the Company and the Plaintiff will be dismissed with prejudice.  As a result, the Company will record a gain of $101,000 in October 2017 to extinguish the remaining accrual upon payment of the settled amount of $30,000.

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not applicable.

 

 7 

 

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Common Stock

 

Our Common Stock is traded on the OTCQB Market under the symbol CVAT. The following table sets forth the high and low price per share based on the closing price of our Common Stock for the periods indicated.

 

    HIGH  LOW 
         
Fiscal 2016 First Quarter $0.06  $0.03 
  Second Quarter  0.03   0.02 
  Third Quarter  0.04   0.02 
  Fourth Quarter  0.04   0.03 
    HIGH LOW
       
Fiscal 2019  First Quarter $0.03  $0.02 
   Second Quarter  0.03   0.02 
   Third Quarter  0.03   0.02 
   Fourth Quarter  0.03   0.02 

 

    HIGH  LOW 
         
Fiscal 2017 First Quarter $0.03  $0.02 
  Second Quarter  0.04   0.02 
  Third Quarter  0.05   0.03 
  Fourth Quarter  0.04   0.03 
Fiscal 2018 First Quarter  0.04   0.03 
    HIGH LOW
       
Fiscal 2020  First Quarter $0.04  $0.02 
   Second Quarter  0.04   0.02 
   Third Quarter  0.04   0.02 
   Fourth Quarter  0.03   0.01 
            
Fiscal 2021  First Quarter  0.04   0.01 

 

We became a public company through a share exchange that was effectedaffected in October 2008. The first day of public trading of our stock was November 11, 2008. Since our fiscal year end was changed to June 30, public trading of our stock began in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. As of October 13, 2017,September 30, 2020, there were approximately 1,1001,140 holders of record of our Common Stock. This does not reflect the number of persons or entities who hold stock in nominee or “street” name through various brokerage firms. The closing price of our common stock on October 5, 2020 was $0.02 per share.

 

Dividend Policy

 

We have neither declared nor paid any dividends on our Common Stock in the preceding two fiscal years. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to fund ongoing operations and finance the growth and development of our business and, therefore, do not anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends on our Common Stock for the foreseeable future. Any future decision to declare or pay dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

 

None.

 

8

Recent Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

We did not sell any equity securities during the year ended June 30, 20172020 in transactions that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, other than as previously disclosed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

  

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

None.

 

ITEM 6.   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

Not applicable for smaller reporting companies.

 

ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes. This discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as its plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Its actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.

 

8

Overview of Our Business

 

We are a Nevada corporation originally incorporated under the name Bio Energy, Inc. On January 29, 2007, we incorporated a wholly owned subsidiary, Hydrodynamic Technology, Inc. as a California corporation.

 

We have developed, patented, and commercialized proprietary technology that can be used for processing of various industrial and consumer-oriented fluids. Our patentedNano Reactor®is the critical components ofthe CTi Nano Neutralization® System which has been shown to reduce operating costs and increase yields in processing oils and fats. CTi holds and applied for numerous patents covering technology and various processes in US and Internationally, covering vegetable and crude oil refining, wasteprocessed and frac water treatment, algae oil extraction, and alcoholic beverage enhancement. During our Fiscal 2020, we have developed additional technologies and products, such as, low pressure nano reactor (LPN™). LPN is designed to become a highly efficient mixer and homogenizer. We believe that LPN has a great commercial utilization opportunity by providing efficient and cost-effective solution in multiple fluid processing industries. LPN has a number of advantages over current mechanically operated mixers and homogenizers. Industrial application of our technology in produced and frac water treatment system, LPN along with our proprietary chemical formulations have depicted measurable and quantifiable advantages over industry standard processes and equipment. Additionally, our miniature low pressure nano reactor MLPN has become an integral part of Barmuze®, a small home appliance device for enhancing taste and extracting unwanted impurities typically present in alcoholic beverages.

 

During the year ended June 30, 2017,2020, we recorded revenuerevenues of $1,063,054. Our net loss from operations in 2017 was $1,066,945$1,663,000 and net cash used in operating activities was $53,311.income of $128,000, respectively.

 

Management’s Plan of Operation

 

At June 30, 2017 weWe are continuously engaged in manufacturing of our Nano Reactor® andNano Neutralization SystemNeutralization® Systemswhich are designed to help refine vegetable oils such as soybean, canola and rapeseed. Additionally, our near-term goal is to develop strategic and marketing tools to apply our technologieswe have developed LPN’s that can be commercially acceptedprovide commercial opportunity in enhancement of wines and spirits, industrial water treatment, enhancement of alcoholic beverages, and MLPN being utilized in a consumer related products.small home appliance.

 

WeDuring the year ended June 30, 2020, we recognized net income of $128,000 and generated net cash from operations of $56,000. However, as of June 30, 2020, we have a working capital deficiency of $1,297,730$522,000 and a stockholders’ deficit of $1,144,720 as of June 30, 2017. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern.$490,000.

9

 

Management’s plan is to generate income from operations by licensing our technology globally through our licensees, Desmet Ballestra Group (Desmet), agreements with EnviroWaterTek and GEA Westfalia Group (GEA).Alchemy Beverages, Inc. In January 2016,October 2018, we signed a three-year globalR and D, Marketing and Technology License Agreementwith Desmet for the sale and licensing of our reactors. TheNano Reactor® and Nano Neutralization® Systems. This agreement expiresis a continuation of the original agreement we signed with Desmet in August 2018 or may be terminated by Desmet every August 1 should Desmet and its affiliates fail to convert a minimum of six Nano Reactors System to sold status during the period of June 1 to May 31. The agreement may also be terminated in case we lose ownership of patents and patent applications being used in ourCTi Nano Neutralization System.2012. As part of the agreement, Desmet is also obligated to provide us with monthly advances of $50,000 to be applied against future sales.our share in gross profit from the sale of reactors. During the year ended June 30, 2017,2020, advances received from Desmet amounted to $500,000.$600,000, of which $266,000 was recorded as revenues. These funds service operational expenses on a monthly basis.

 

In January 2017, we signed a three-year global R&D, Marketing and Technology License Agreement with GEA Group, (GEA) covering certain processes and patented applications. This agreement provides the Companyprovided us with $25,000 monthly advances to be applied against future sales.license fees or our share in gross profit from the sale of reactors. The agreement with GEA expired in December 2019, and during the term of the agreement, the Company did not sell any reactors to GEA. Accordingly, for the year ending June 30, 2020, the Company recognized $877,000 of non-refundable payments received in 2017 to 2019 as revenue.

In April 2019, the Company entered into a licensing and service contract agreement with Enviro Watertek, LLC (“EW”). This agreement maycovers the Company’s industrial treatment process for produced and frack water. The Company’s Low Pressure Nano Reactor (LPN), was specifically developed to be integrated into frack water treatment system along with proprietary chemical formulations, and has depicted measurable and quantifiable advantages over industry standard processes and equipment. The agreement with EW provides for sales on Nano Reactors® plus recurring revenue stream based on processing frack water volumes and utilization or usage fees. Our agreement with EW is for a period of 15 years but can be terminated by either party on each anniversary date. As ofevery anniversary. During the year ended June 30, 2017,2020, we recorded revenues of $38,000 from the Companysale of reactors and usage fees.

In June 2018, we agreed to license Cameo USA LLC, to Alchemy Beverages Inc. (“ABI”). In addition, we have agreed to provide certain licensing rights related to our miniature low pressure nano-reactor (MLPN) to be used in developing and manufacturing of small home appliances to enhance alcoholic beverages. In consideration for these ABI has not yet received any advances from GEA or recorded any revenues under this agreement. Subsequentagreed to issue 19.9% of ABI’s outstanding common shares to us (limited to 20 million shares of ABI). ABI is a private company and in the business of producing and selling alcoholic beverages, equipment, and home appliances. Since the start of the agreement up to June 30, 2017, we received advances totaling $100,000.2020, there was no revenue recognized with regards to our agreement with Alchemy Beverages, Inc.

  

In addition to these advances, weWe anticipate that we may need additional funding, and we may attempt to raise additional debt and/or equity financing to fund operations and to provide additional working capital. However, there is no assurance that such financing will be consummated or obtained in sufficient amounts necessary to meet our needs, or that we will be able to meet our future contractual obligations. Should management fail to obtain such financing, we may curtail its operations. Management estimates that cash on hand together with advances from Desmet and GEA will allow us to operate beyond fiscal 2018.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from our inability to continue as a going concern. As a result of the aforementioned factors, our independent auditors, in their report on our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended June 30, 2017, expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Revenue Recognition

 

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. The accounting policies and estimates described below are those we consider most critical in preparing its consolidated financial statements. The following is a review of the accounting policies and estimates that include significant judgments made by management using information available at the time the estimates are made. However, these estimates could change materially if different information or assumptions were used instead.

 

9

Note 3 to our1 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements includes a summary of significant accounting policies, estimates, and methods used in the preparation of our financial statements. Accounting estimates are an integral part of the preparation of financial statements and are based on judgments by management using its knowledge and experience about the past and current events and assumptions regarding future events, all of which we consider to be reasonable. These judgments and estimates reflect the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain and that affect the carrying value of our assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities and reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Revenue from the sale of ourNano Reactor® systems is being recognized when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists; shipment has occurred, including transfer of title and risk of loss for product sales, services have been rendered for service revenues; the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectability was reasonably assured. 

We are also entitled to a profit share from our distributor from the sale of the reactors to their customers.  Pursuant to the May 2012 agreement with our distributor, the profit share was fixed and determinable at the time of shipment, and as such, recorded upon shipment and acceptance of the reactors by the distributor. Pursuant to the January 2016 agreement with the Company’s distributor, the profit share is not fixed at the time of delivery, and as such, revenue is recognized when the profit share is fixed and determinable, which is generally be upon delivery and installation of the NANO Neutralization System by the distributor to its customer.

Recoverability of Intangible and Long-Lived Assets

Management believes that the accounting estimate related to the recoverability of its intangible and long-lived assets is a “critical accounting estimate” because significant changes in the assumptions used to develop the estimates could materially affect key financial measures, including net income and non-current assets.

Testing intangible and long-lived assets for impairment involves a high degree of judgment due to the assumptions that underlie the undiscounted cash flows analysis. In accordance with ASC 350-30, we evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net book value may not be recoverable. When such factors and circumstances exist, we compare the projected undiscounted future cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value based on market value when available or discounted expected cash flows of those assets and is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. Management believes there is no impairment of its long-lived assets. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for our products under development will continue. Either of these could result in future impairment of long-lived assets.

Share-Based Compensation

We periodically issue stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. We account for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on the authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board whereas the value of the award is measured on the date of grant and recognized over the vesting period. We account for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non- employees in accordance with the authoritative guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board whereas the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges generally are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, option grants are immediately vested and the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded in the period of the measurement date.

 10 

 

 

DeterminingRevenue Recognition

The Company follows the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASC 606 creates a five-step model that requires entities to exercise judgment when considering the terms of contracts, which includes (1) identifying the contracts or agreements with a customer, (2) identifying our performance obligations in the contract or agreement, (3) determining the transaction price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the separate performance obligations, and (5) recognizing revenue as each performance obligation is satisfied. The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that the Company will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the services it transfers to its clients

Revenue from sale of our Nano Reactor® and LPN is recognized when products are shipped from our manufacturing facilities as this is our sole performance obligation under these contracts and we have no continuing obligation to the customer.

The Company also recognizes revenue from its share of gross profit to be earned from distributors, as defined, which we treat as variable consideration and recognize using the most likely amount method. Estimates are available from our distributor which are considered in the determination of the most likely amount. However, given the lack of control over the sale to the end customer and the lack of history of prior sales, the amount of gross profit revenue recognized is limited to the actual amount of cash received under the contract which the Company has determined is not refundable and that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract will not occur.

In addition, the Company also recognizes revenues from usage fees of certain reactors. Usage fees are recognized based on actual usage by the customer and when collectability is reasonably assured.

Lease

The Company accounts for leases under the guidance of ASC 842, Leases (“ASC 842”), which requires an entity to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all leases. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. The Company accounts for the lease and non-lease components of its office lease as a single lease component. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for share-based awards to employees and nonemployees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at fair value of share-based awards aton the measurementgrant date requires judgment, including estimating the expected termand that stock options and warrants will be outstanding prior to exercise, the associated volatility, and the expected dividends. We estimate the fair value of options grantedis recognized as expense over the requisite service, or vesting, period.

11

The Company values its equity awards using the Black-Scholes valuation model.option pricing model, and accounts for forfeitures when they occur. Use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of subjective assumptions including expected volatility, expected term, and a risk-free interest rate. The Company estimates volatility using a blend of its own historical stock price volatility as well as that of market comparable entities since the Company's common stock has limited trading history and limited observable volatility of its own. The expected lifeterm of the options used in this calculation is estimated by using the period the options aresimplified method to estimate expected to be outstanding and has been determined based on historical exercise experience. Expected stock price volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock for a period approximating the expected life, and theterm. The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on US Treasury zero-coupon issues approximating the expected life. Judgment is also required in estimating the amount of share-based awards that will be forfeited prior to vesting. We believe that these assumptions are “critical accounting estimates” because significant changes in the assumptions used to develop the estimates could materially affect key financial measures including net income (loss).estimated using comparable published federal funds rates.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

See Note 31 of the financial statements for discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

 

Results of Operations

 

Below is summary comparing fiscal 20172020 and fiscal 2016.2019.

 

 For the Years Ended       For the Years Ended    
 June 30,       June 30,    
 2017  2016  $ Change  % Change  2020 2019 $ Change % Change
                 
Revenue  $1,063,054  $1,798,217  $(735,163)  

-41

% $1,663,000  $1,090,000  $573,000   53 %
Cost of revenue  69,441   121,505   (52,064)  

-43

%  (40,000)  (69,000)  (29,000)  (43)%
Gross profit  993,613   1,676,712   (683,099)  

-41

%  1,623,000   1,021,000   602,000   59%
                                
General and administrative expenses  2,033,453   1,214,561   818,892   67%  1,469,000   1,719,000   (250,000)  (15)%
Research and development expenses  27,105   29,371   (2,266)  

-8

%  18,000   25,000   (7,000)  – %
Total operating expenses  2,060,558   1,243,932   816,626   66%  1,487,000   1,744,000   (257,000)  (14)%
Net income (loss) $(1,066,945) $432,780   (1,499,725)  

-347

%
Income (loss) from Operations  136,000   (723,000)  859,000   118 %
Loss on transfer of accrued payroll  (8,000)     8,000   100 %
Net Income (Loss) $128,000  $(723,000) $851,000   118 %

 

Revenue

 

During the year ended June 30, 20172020 revenue decreasedincreased by 41%53% to $1,063,054$1,663,000 and was derived from the sale of eight of ourNano Reactor® and CTi Nano Neutralization Systems and twenty-two reactor lines (a total of 66 reactors) delivered to Desmet as part of $427,000 and corresponding share in gross profit in the revisedaggregate of $266,000. In addition, the Company also recorded an aggregate revenue of $40,000 from the sale of LPN™ reactors and usage fees to Enviro Watertek, LLC. Also, we recorded revenue of $887,000 to account for fees received pursuant to our agreement entered intowith GEA that expired in January 2016. December 2019.

During the year ended June 30, 2016,2019, we recorded revenue of $1,798,217$1,090,000, which was derived largely from the sale of four of ourNano Reactor® and CTi Nano Neutralization Systemsthrough Desmet Ballestra, consisting of $533,000 for $517,000 and 16 additional reactor linescorresponding share in ordergross profit of $517,000. Additionally, we have recorded $40,000 from the sale of our LPN™ reactors to close-out the May 2012 agreement that expired in August 2015.EW.

12

 

Operating Expenses

 

Operating expenses for fiscal 20172020 amounted to $2,060,558$1,487,000 versus $1,243,932$1,744,000 in fiscal 2016, an increase2019, a decrease of $816,626$257,000 or 66%15%. The increasedecrease in operating expenses was mostly attributableattributed to non-cash costs resulting from the issuance of 2.8 million shares of commonlower legal fees, office expenses and stock and 11.6 million warrantscompensation expense compared to acquire shares of our common stock to officers, consultants and a director of with a fair value of $545,000.fiscal 2019. Non-cash expense items such as amortization and depreciation expense of $50,967,$39,000, primarily amounted to a small proportion of operating expenses, with major expense categories being salaries and write-offpayroll taxes of inventory $28,049approximately $686,000, legal and professional fees of approximately $119,000 and $154,000 for travel, insurance and marketing services combined. Research and development (R&D) expense was $18,000 compared to $25,000 the same as in the year ended June 30, 2019.

Operating expenses for fiscal 2019 amounted to $1,744,000. Non-cash expense items such as amortization and depreciation expense of $41,000 among others, amounted to a small proportion of operating expenses, with major expense categories being salaries and payroll taxes of approximately $548,000,$699,000, legal and professional fees of approximately $376,000,$97,000, various insurance policies, amounting to $115,000 and travel insurance and marketing services fees. Research and development (R&D) expense decreased by $2,266 or 7.7% for the year ended June 30, 2017.amounting to $167,000.

 

11

Operating expenses forLoss on transfer of accrued payroll

In fiscal 2016 amounted to $1,243,932. Non-cash expense items such as amortization and depreciation expense of $60,126, and write-off of inventory of $18,792 among others, amounted2020, $196,000 due to a small proportionformer officer was acquired from the former officer by an unrelated party. The former officer, the unrelated party, and the Company agreed that the amount of operating expenses, with majorthe accrued payroll $204,000, and the Company recorded a loss on the transfer of the liability of $8,000. There was no similar expense categories being salaries and payroll taxes of approximately $505,000, legal and professional fees of approximately $174,000, various insurance policies amounting to $96,333 and travel, insurance and marketing services fees.in fiscal 2019.

Net Income (Loss)

 

Our reported Net Lossnet income in fiscal 20172020 was $1,066,945 vs Net Income$128,000 compared to net loss in fiscal 20162019 of $432,780.$723,000.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

DuringOur cash balance at June 30, 2020 increased to $759,000 compared to $649,000 at June 30, 2019. For the fiscal year ended on June 30, 2017,2020, cash used inprovided by operating activities was $53,311 and$56,000, cash used in investing activities was $55,500 resulting from$50,000, and cash provided by financing activities was $104,000. For the purchase of equipment which was financed with cash reserves and proceeds from reactor sales from our partner, Desmet Ballestra, resulted in net decrease in cash of $108,811.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016,2019, net cash used in operating activitiesoperations was $759,604 and$280,000, cash used in investing activities was $61,565 resulting$16,000, and there was no cash generated from the purchase of equipment of $61,565 resulted in net decrease in cash of $821,169.financing activities.

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern.  During the year ended June 30, 2017, we recorded net loss of $1,066,945 and utilized $53,311 of cash in operations. As of June 30, 2017,2020, we had a stockholders’ deficit of $490,000, and a working capital deficiency of $1,297,730, and stockholders’ deficit of $1,144,720.   We have also been dependent on certain aspects of our funding from a technology agreement with a distributor.$522,000. These factors,conditions, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying consolidatedconcern within one year of the date that the financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from an inability of us to continue as a going concern.are issued. In addition, ourthe Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its report on our June 30, 2017 consolidated2020 financial statements, has raised substantial doubt about ourthe Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management’s plan is to generate income from operations by continuing to license ourits technology globally through our strategic partner with the Desmet Ballestra Group (Desmet). Pursuant toglobally. Currently, we have a R&D, Marketing and Technology License agreement with Desmet that was signed in January 2016,October 2018, in which Desmet has provided us monthlyprovides advances to the Company of $50,000 which started in January of 2016 and are expected to continue up to the expiration of the agreement in August 2018 but can be terminated on each August 1 under certain circumstances. These advances willper month through October 2021 be applied againstto future salesgross profit revenues. Additionally, we anticipate to Desmet. During the year ended June 30, 2017 advances receivedgenerate revenues from Desmet amounted to $500,000.

In January 2017, we signed a three-year global R&D, Marketingour agreements with EW and Technology License Agreement with GEA Group, (GEA) covering certain processes and patented applications. This agreement provides the company with $25,000 monthly advances against future sales. This agreement may be terminated by either party on each anniversary date. As of June 30, 2017, the Company has not yet received any advances from GEA or recorded any revenues under this agreement. Subsequent to June 30, 2017, we received advances totaling $100,000.ABI.

 

We willmay also attempt to raise additional debt and/or equity financing to fund operations and to provide additional working capital. There is no assurance that such financing will be available in the future or obtained in sufficient amounts necessary to meet our needs, that we will be able to achieve profitable operations or that we will be able to meet our future contractual obligations. Should management fail to obtain such financing, we may curtail its operations.

Sources and Uses of Cash

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, net cash used in operating activities amounted to $53,311, a decrease over fiscal 2016 of almost $706,293. During the year ended June 30, 2017 we received proceeds totaling $1,373,750 from Desmet Ballestra from sale of reactors which included $500,000 in advances for gross profit share. This cash was used largely to pay operating costs, legal and professional service providers, acquire new inventory, pay management salaries and to pay travel and insurance expenses.

During fiscal 2016, net cash used in operating activities amounted to $759,604 and we received gross proceeds of $500,000 in advances against future gross profit share from our partner, Desmet Ballestra.

Net cash used in investing activities for property and equipment during fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 amounted to $55,500 and $61,565 respectively.

We did not conduct any financing activities in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

12

  

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on its financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

 

ITEM 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

 

Not applicable for Smaller Reporting Companies.

 

 13 

 

 

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Cavitation Technologies, Inc.
Los Angeles,Chatsworth, CA

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cavitation Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 20172020 and 2016 and2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficiency and stockholders’ deficit at June 30, 2020. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform ourthe audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. OurAs part of our audits included considerationwe are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that we considered appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion,We have served as the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cavitation Technologies, Inc. as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.Company’s auditor since 2013.

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the/s/ Weinberg & Company, will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2, the Company has experienced recurring net losses since inception and has a stockholders’ deficit as of June 30, 2017. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2 to the financial statements. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.P.A.

 

/s/ Weinberg & Company, P.A.

Weinberg & Company, P.A.

Los Angeles, California
November 3, 2017

October 13, 2020  

 

 14 

 

CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 June 30, June 30, 
 2017  2016  June 30,
2020
 June 30,
2019
         
ASSETS                
                
Current assets:                
Cash and cash equivalents $548,585  $657,396 
Inventory, net  143,136   153,811 
Cash $759,000  $649,000 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,000 and $0, respectively  104,000   240,000 
Inventory  47,000   57,000 
Total current assets  691,721   811,207   910,000   946,000 
                
Property and equipment, net  140,606   122,641   76,000   65,000 
Patents, net  2,904   16,336 
Right-of-use assets, net of accumulated amortization of $60,000  308,000    
Other assets  9,500   9,500   10,000   10,000 
Total assets $844,731  $959,684  $1,304,000  $1,021,000 
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT                
                
Current liabilities:                
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $245,452  $171,029  $316,000  $187,000 
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes due to officers  994,033   994,033 
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes-related parties  693,000   892,000 
Related party payable  1,147   1,147   1,000   1,000 
Advances from distributor, net  748,819   436,250 
Operating lease liability, current portion  54,000    
Advances from distributors  368,000   760,000 
Total current liabilities  1,989,451   1,602,459   1,432,000   1,840,000 
        
Operating lease liability, non-current portion  258,000    
Note payable, non-current  104,000    
Total liabilities  1,794,000   1,840,000 
                
Commitments and contingencies                
                
Stockholders' deficit:                
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively  -   - 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 196,797,906 and 193,997,906 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively  196,798   193,998 
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively      
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 196,997,906 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively  197,000   197,000 
Additional paid-in capital  22,625,088   22,062,888   23,291,000   23,090,000 
Accumulated deficit  (23,966,606)  (22,899,661)  (23,978,000)  (24,106,000)
Total stockholders' deficit  (1,144,720)  (642,775)  (490,000)  (819,000)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $844,731  $959,684  $1,304,000  $1,021,000 

 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statements

 

 15 

 

CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 For the Years Ended  For the Years Ended
 June 30,  June 30,
 2017  2016  2020 2019
         
Revenue $1,063,054  $1,798,217  $1,663,000  $1,090,000 
Cost of revenue  69,441   121,505   (40,000)  (69,000)
Gross profit  993,613   1,676,712   1,623,000   1,021,000 
                
General and administrative expenses  2,033,453   1,214,561   1,469,000   1,719,000 
Research and development expenses  27,105   29,371   18,000   25,000 
Total operating expenses  2,060,558   1,243,932   1,487,000   1,744,000 
                
Income (loss) from operations  136,000   (723,000)
        
Loss on transfer of accrued payroll  (8,000)   
        
Income (loss) before income taxes  128,000   (723,000)
Provision for income taxes      
Net income (loss) $(1,066,945) $432,780  $128,000  $(723,000)
                
Net income (loss) per share,        
Basic and Diluted $(0.00) $0.00 
Net income (loss) per share, Basic and Diluted $0.00  $(0.00)
                
Weighted average shares outstanding,        
Basic  195,053,401   193,997,906 
        
Diluted  195,053,401   194,352,745 
Weighted average shares outstanding, Basic and diluted  196,997,906   196,997,906 

 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statements

 

 16 

 

 

CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 20172020 AND 20162019

 

  Series A
Preferred
  Common
Stock
  Additional
Paid-
  Common
Stock
  Accumulated    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  in Capital  Issuable  Deficit  Total 
Balance at June 30, 2015  -  $-   184,968,551  $184,968  $21,259,285  $812,633  $(23,332,441) $(1,075,555)
Issuance of common stock          9,029,355   9,030   803,603   (812,633)      - 
Net income                          432,780   432,780 
Balance at June 30, 2016  -   -   193,997,906   193,998   22,062,888   -   (22,899,661)  (642,775)
Issuance of common stock for services          2,800,000   2,800   109,200   -       112,000 
Fair value of warrants issued for services                  453,000           453,000 
Net loss                          (1,066,945)  (1,066,945)
Balance at June 30, 2017  -  $-   196,797,906  $196,798  $22,625,088  $-  $(23,966,606) $(1,144,720)
  Common
Stock
 Additional
Paid-
 Accumulated  
  Shares Amount in Capital Deficit Total
Balance at June 30, 2018  196,997,906  $197,000  $22,641,000  $(23,383,000) $(545,000)
Fair value of warrants granted for services        115,000      115,000 
Fair value of amended warrants        334,000      334,000 
Net loss           (723,000)  (723,000)
Balance at June 30, 2019  196,997,906   197,000   23,090,000   (24,106,000)  (819,000)
Fair value of warrants granted for services        194,000      194,000 
Fair value of amended options and warrants        7,000      7,000 
Net income           128,000   128,000 
Balance at June 30, 2020  196,997,906  $197,000  $23,291,000  $(23,978,000) $(490,000)

 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statements

 

 17 

 

 

CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 

 

  Years Ended June 30, 
  2020  2019 
       
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net income (loss) $128,000  $(723,000)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  39,000   41,000 
Fair value of warrants granted for services  194,000   115,000 
Fair value of amended options and warrants  7,000   334,000 
Amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets  60,000    
Loss on transfer of accrued payroll  8,000    
Allowance for bad debts  5,000    
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  131,000   (240,000)
Inventory  10,000   (23,000)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  (75,000)  (120,000)
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes due to officers  (3,000)  3,000 
Advances from distributors  (392,000)  333,000 
Operating lease liability  (56,000)   
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  56,000   (280,000)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Purchase of property and equipment  (50,000)  (16,000)
Net cash used in investing activities  (50,000)  (16,000)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from note payable  104,000    
Net cash provided by financing activities  104,000    
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  110,000   (296,000)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  649,000   945,000 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $759,000  $649,000 
         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
Cash paid for interest $  $ 
Cash paid for income taxes $  $ 
Supplemental disclosures on non-cash investing and financing activities        
Transfer of accrued payroll to accounts payable and accrued expenses $204,000  $ 
Initial recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease obligations upon adoption of ASC Topic 842 $368,000  $ 

  Years Ended June 30, 
  2017  2016 
       
Operating activities:        
Net income (loss) $(1,066,945) $432,780 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  50,967   60,126 
Fair value of common stock issued for services  112,000   - 
Fair value of vested warrants  453,000   - 
Allowance for inventory obsolescence  -   18,792 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Inventory  10,675   (37,004)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  74,423   (27,657)
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes due to officers  -   (22,190)
Advances from distributor  500,000   436,250 
Reduction in advances due to realization of revenues from distributor  (187,431)  (1,620,701)
Net cash used in operating activities  (53,311)  (759,604)
         
Investing activities:        
Purchase of property and equipment  (55,500)  (61,565)
Net cash used in investing activities  (55,500)  (61,565)
         
Net change in cash  (108,811)  (821,169)
Cash, beginning of period  657,396   1,478,565 
Cash, end of period $548,585  $657,396 
         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
Cash paid for interest $-  $- 
Cash paid for income taxes $1,600  $1,600 

 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of theseto the consolidated financial statements

 

 18 

 

 

CAVITATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 20172020 AND 20162019

 

Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Cavitation Technologies, Inc. (referred to herein, unless otherwise indicated, as “the(“the Company,” “CTi,” “we,” “us,” and “our”) is a Nevada corporation originally incorporated in January 2007 under the name Bio Energy, Inc. CTiThe Company has developed, patented, and commercialized proprietary technology that may be used in liquid processing applications. CTi’s patentedNano Reactor® is the critical component of CTiNano Neutralization® System which has commercially been shown to reduce operating costs and increase yields in refining vegetable oils. We have three US and one international patented systems, as well as eight US approved patents for various processes, and have filed another fifteen US and international patents to employ our proprietary technology in applications including vegetable and oil refining, waste water treatment, algae oil extraction, and alcoholic beverage enhancement.

In addition, we have commercialized ourCTi Nano Neutralization® Systemin the refining process of certain vegetable oils which has proven to reduce costs and increase yields for our customers.

Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Going Concern

 

Going Concern

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles which contemplate continuationthe normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, at June 30, 2020, the Company ashad a going concern.  During the year ended June 30, 2017, the Company incurred a net lossstockholders’ deficit of $1,066,945$490,000 and utilized $53,311 of cash in operations. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had a working capital deficiency of $1,297,730 and a stockholders’ deficit of $1,144,720. The Company has also been dependent on certain aspects of its funding from a technology and license agreement with a distributor that expires in August 2018.$522,000. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from an inability of the Company to continue as a going concern. Management’s

At June 30, 2020, the Company had cash in the amount of $759,000. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to continue to implement its business plan. Currently, management’s plan is to generate income from operationsincrease revenues by continuing to license its technology globally through our strategic partner withglobally. While the Desmet Ballestra Group (Desmet). PursuantCompany believes in the viability of its strategy to increase revenues, there can be no assurances to that effect. Currently, we have a R&D, Marketing and Technology License agreement with Desmet that was signed in January 2016,which Desmet has providedprovides advances to the Company with monthly advances of $50,000 which started in January of 2016 and are expected to continueper month through expiration of the technology and license agreement in August 2018. These advances are expected to be applied against future sales to Desmet. During the year ended June 30, 2017 advances received from Desmet amounted to $500,000.

In January 2017, the Company signed a three-year global R&D, Marketing and Technology License Agreement with GEA Group, (GEA) covering certain processes and patented applications. This agreement provides the Company with $25,000 monthly advances against future sales, and may be terminated by either party on each anniversary date. As of June 30, 2017, the Company has not yet received any advances from GEA or recorded any revenues under this agreement. Subsequent to June 30, 2017, we received advances totaling $100,000.October 2021.

 

The Company may also attempt to raise additional debt and/or equity financing to fund operations and to provide additional working capital. There is no assurance that such financing will be available in the future or obtained in sufficient amounts necessary to meet the Company’s needs, that the Company will be able to achieve profitable operations or that the Company will be able to meet its future contractual obligations. Should management fail to obtain such financing, the Company may curtail its operations.

 

Note 3 - Significant Accounting Policies

COVID-19

 

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared coronavirus COVID-19 a global pandemic. This contagious disease outbreak, which has continued to spread, has adversely affected workforces, customers, economies, and financial markets globally. It has also disrupted the normal operations of many businesses. This outbreak could decrease spending, adversely affect demand for the Company’s products, and harm the Company’s business and results of operations. During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company believes the COVID-19 pandemic did not materially impact its operating results due to the nature of the Company’s business and its operations. The Company has not observed any impairments of its assets or a significant change in the fair value of its assets due to the COVID-19 pandemic. At this time, it is not possible for the Company to predict the duration or magnitude of the adverse results of the outbreak and its effects on the Company’s business or results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.

As of June 30, 2020, the Company has been following the recommendations of local health authorities to minimize exposure risk for its employees, including the temporary closure of its corporate office and having employees work remotely. Most vendors have transitioned to electronic submission of invoices and payments.

19

Principles of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cavitation Technologies, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Hydrodynamic Technology, Inc. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the financial statement date, and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include estimates for allowance for doubtful accounts, reserves for inventory obsolescence, assumptions used in valuing our stock options, stock warrants and common stock issued for services, the valuation allowance for our deferred tax asset, and the accrual of potential liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASC 606 creates a five-step model that requires entities to exercise judgment when considering the terms of contracts, which includes (1) identifying the contracts or agreements with a customer, (2) identifying our performance obligations in the contract or agreement, (3) determining the transaction price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the separate performance obligations, and (5) recognizing revenue as each performance obligation is satisfied. The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that the Company will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the services it transfers to its clients.

Revenue from sale of our Nano Reactors is recognized when products are shipped from our manufacturing facilities as this is our sole performance obligation under these contracts and we have no continuing obligation to the customer.

The Company also recognizes revenue from its share of gross profit to be earned from distributors, as defined, which we treat as variable consideration and recognize using the most likely amount method. Estimates are available from our distributor which are considered in the determination of the most likely amount. However, given the lack of control over the sale to the end customer and the lack of history of prior sales, the amount of gross profit revenue recognized is limited to the actual amount of cash received under the contract which the Company has determined is not refundable and that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract will not occur.

In addition, the Company also recognizes revenues from usage fees of certain reactors. Usage fees are recognized based on actual usage by the customer.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates market value.

The Company maintains its cash with one domestic financial institution. From time to time, cash balances in this domestic bank may exceed federally insured limits provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) of up to $250,000.

As of June 30, 2020, and 2019, Company had deposits in excess of federally insured limit with one bank. The Company believes that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to this cash balances because of its assessment of the creditworthiness and financial viability of this financial institution.

20

Accounts Receivable

The Company evaluates the collectability of our trade accounts receivable based on a number of factors. In circumstances where it becomes aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us, a specific reserve for bad debts is estimated and recorded which reduces the recognized receivable to the estimated amount that management believes will ultimately be collected. In addition to specific customer identification of potential bad debts, bad debt charges are recorded based on our historical losses and an overall assessment of past due trade accounts receivable outstanding.

As of June 30, 2020, the Company recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,000. There was no allowance for doubtful accounts recorded as of June 30, 2019.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined on a specific item basis. Inventory is composed of finished goods and represents costs incurred to manufacture the Company’s Nano Reactor® systems and LPN.

There was no recorded allowance for excess quantities and obsolescence as of June 30, 2020 and 2019.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is presented at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Betterments, renewals, and extraordinary repairs that extend the life of the assets are capitalized; other repairs and maintenance charges are expensed as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation applicable to retired assets are removed from the Company’s accounts, and the gain or loss on dispositions, if any, is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives.

Leasehold improvementsShorter of life of asset or lease term
Furniture5-7 Years
Office equipment5 Years
Lab equipment4 Years
Skid systems4 Years

Management assesses the carrying value of property and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If there is indication of impairment, management prepares an estimate of future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If these cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized to write down the asset to its estimated fair value.

For the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company did not recognize any impairment for its property and equipment.

Income Taxes

The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes.  The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect the estimated future tax effects, calculated at anticipated future tax rates, of future deductible or taxable amounts attributable to events that have been recognized on a cumulative basis in the financial statements. A valuation allowance related to a deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and rates of the date of enactment.

21

Leases

Prior to July 1, 2019, the Company accounted for leases under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 840, Accounting for Leases. Effective July 1, 2019, the Company adopted the guidance of ASC 842, Leases (“ASC 842”), which requires an entity to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all leases. The Company adopted ASC 842 using a modified retrospective approach. As a result, the comparative financial information has not been updated and the required disclosures prior to the date of adoption have not been updated and continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. The Company accounts for the lease and non-lease components of its office lease as a single lease component. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The adoption of ASC 842 on July 1, 2019 resulted in the initial recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets of $368,000, lease liabilities for operating leases of $368,000, and a zero cumulative-effect adjustment to accumulated deficit (see Note 3).

Fair Value Measurement

 

FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820-10 requires entities to disclose the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized on the balance sheet for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. ASC 820-10 defines the fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties.

19

 

In addition to defining fair value, the standard expands the disclosure requirements around fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which are determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are:

  

Level 1 - inputs are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

 

Level 2 - inputs are based upon significant observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

Level 3 - inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques.

 

As of June 30, 2017,2020, and 2019, the carrying value of certain accounts such as accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued payroll approximates their fair value due to the short-term nature of such instruments.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the financial statement date, and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates are used in reserves for inventory obsolescence, valuing our stock options, stock warrants and common stock issued for services and realization of our deferred tax asset, among other items. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from the sale of the Company’sNano Reactor® Systems is recognized when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists; shipment has occurred, including transfer of title and risk of loss for product sales, or services have been rendered for service revenues; the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company is also entitled to a profit share from its distributor from the sale of the reactors to their customers. Pursuant to the May 2012 agreement with our distributor, the profit share was fixed and determinable at the time of shipment, and as such, recorded upon shipment and acceptance of the reactors by the distributor.Pursuant to the January 2016 agreement with the Company’s distributor, the profit share is not fixed at the time of delivery, and as such, revenue is recognized when the profit share is fixed and determinable, which will generally be upon delivery and installation of theNANO Neutralization Systemby the distributor to its customer.

Cash

The Company considers highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates market value. 

The Company maintains its cash with one domestic financial institution. From time to time, cash balance in this domestic bank may exceed federally insured limits provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) of up to $250,000. As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, before adjustments for outstanding checks and deposits in transit, the Company had approximately $549,000 and $657,000, respectively, on deposit with one bank. The Company believes that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to this cash balances because of its assessment of the creditworthiness and financial viability of this financial institution.

20

 

Inventory

Inventory, net of an allowance for excess quantities and obsolescence, is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a specific item basis. Inventory is composed of finished goods and represents costs incurred to manufacture the Company’sNano Reactor®systems.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is presented at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Betterments, renewals, and extraordinary repairs that extend the life of the assets are capitalized; other repairs and maintenance charges are expensed as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation applicable to retired assets are removed from the Company’s accounts, and the gain or loss on dispositions, if any, is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives.

Leasehold improvementsShorter of life of asset or lease
Furniture5-7 Years
Office equipment5 Years
Lab equipment4 Years
Skid systems4 Years

Management assesses the carrying value of property and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If there is indication of impairment, management prepares an estimate of future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If these cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized to write down the asset to its estimated fair value. For the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not recognize any impairment for its property and equipment.

Patents

Capitalized patent costs represent legal fees associated with procuring and filing patent applications. The Company accounts for patents in accordance with ASC 350-30,General Intangibles Other Than Goodwill. The Company has five patents issued in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011. As of June 30, 2017, the Company has a total of 25 patents pending. The patents have duration of twenty years from filing date. The Company amortizes its patents over a four-year period which we believe is a reasonable estimate based upon its estimate of time until the next generation of reactors is developed or until other forms of competition appear.

During the year ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized patent amortization expense of $13,432. As of June 30, 2017, total capitalized patent costs amounted to $129,363 and accumulated amortization of $126,459 or a net balance of $2,904.

During the year ended June 30, 2016, the Company recognized patent amortization expense of $20,830. As of June 30, 2016, total capitalized patent costs amounted to $129,363 and accumulated amortization of $113,027 or a net balance of $16,336.

At June 30, 2017, future estimated patent amortization costs are as follows:

Year Ended   
June 30, Amount 
2018  2,904 
Total $2,904 

21

Impairment of Intangible and Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with ASC 350-30,General Intangibles Other than Goodwill, the Company evaluates amortizable intangibles and long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their net book value may not be recoverable. When such factors and circumstances exist, the Company compares the projected undiscounted future cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value, based on market value when available, or discounted expected cash flows, of those assets and is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. Based on the Company annual impairment tests, management believes there is no impairment of its intangibles and long-lived assets as of June 30, 2017 and 2016. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s products under development will continue. Either of these could result in future impairment of intangibles and long-lived assets.

Share-Based Compensation

 

The Company periodically issues stock options and warrantsaccounts for share-based awards to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for servicesnonemployees and for financing costs. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on the authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board whereas the value of the award is measured on the date of grant and recognized over the vesting period. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employeesconsultants in accordance with the authoritative guidanceprovisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at fair value on the Financial Accounting Standards Board whereasgrant date and that fair value is recognized as expense over the requisite service, or vesting, period.

In periods through June 30, 2019, the Company accounted for share-based compensation issued to non-employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 505-50, Equity - Based Payments to Non-Employees. Measurement of share-based payment transactions with non-employees is based on the fair value of whichever is more reliably measurable: (a) the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached,goods or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earnservices received; or (b) the equity instruments is complete. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges generally are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, option grants are immediately vested and the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded in the period of the measurement date.

issued. The final fair value of the Company’s common stock option and warrant grantsshare-based payment transaction is determined at the performance completion date. For interim periods, the fair value is estimated, and the percentage of completion is applied to that estimate to determine the cumulative expense recorded.

22

On July 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2018-07 simplifies the accounting for share-based transactions by expanding the scope of Topic 718 from only being applicable to share-based payments to employees to also include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. As a result, nonemployee share-based transactions are measured by estimating the fair value of the equity instruments at the grant date, taking into consideration the probability of satisfying performance conditions. The adoption of ASU 2018-07 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2020 or the previously reported financial statements.

The Company values its equity awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected lifeand accounts for forfeitures when they occur. Use of the options and warrants, and future dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of subjective assumptions including expected volatility, expected term, and based on actual experience.a risk-free interest rate. The assumptions used inCompany estimates volatility using a blend of its own historical stock price volatility as well as that of market comparable entities since the Black-Scholes option pricing model could materially affect compensation expense recorded in future periods.Company's common stock has limited trading history and limited observable volatility of its own. The expected term of the options is estimated by using the simplified method to estimate expected term. The risk-free interest rate is estimated using comparable published federal funds rates.

 

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10,Income Taxes.  The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect the estimated future tax effects, calculated at anticipated future tax rates, of future deductible or taxable amounts attributable to events that have been recognized on a cumulative basis in the financial statements. A valuation allowance related to a deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and rates of the date of enactment.

ASC 740-10 prescribes a recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance on recognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition issues. The Company classifies interest and penalties as a component of interest and other expenses. To date, there have been no interest or penalties assessed or paid.

The Company measures and records uncertain tax positions by establishing a threshold for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  Only tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date may be recognized or continue to be recognized.

Advertising Costs

 

Advertising costs, including marketing expense, incurred in the normal course of operations are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses amounted to $30,996$20,000 and $45,241$16,000 for the years ended June 30, 20172020 and 20162019 respectively and was reported as part of General and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

Research and Development Costs

 

Research and development expenses relate primarily to the development, design, testing of preproduction prototypes and models, compensation, and consulting fees, and are expensed as incurred. Total research and development costs recorded during the years ended June 30, 20172020 and 20162019 amounted to $27,105$18,000 and $29,371,$25,000, respectively.

 

22

Warranty Policy

 

The Company provides a limited warranty with every set of reactors sold, typically 2 to 5 years. The Company has not experienced significant claims under its warranty policy, and management determined no accrual for warranty reserve was necessary at June 30, 20172020 and 2016.2019.

  

Net Income (loss)(Loss) Per Share

 

The Company’s computation of earningsnet income (loss) per share (“EPS”) includes basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is measured as the income (loss) available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution, using the treasury stock method, that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the income of the Company as if they had been converted at the beginning of the periods presented, or issuance date, if later. In computing diluted income per share, the treasury stock method assumes that outstanding options and warrants arewere exercised and the proceeds are used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Options and warrants may have a dilutive effect under the treasury stock method only when the average market price of the common stock during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options and warrants. Potential common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS.

 

23

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted incomeloss per common share.

 

 June 30,  June 30,
 2017  2016  2020 2019
         
Net income (loss) $(1,066,945) $432,780  $128,000  $(723,000)
                
Weighted average common shares – basic  195,053,401   193,997,906   196,997,906   197,997,906 
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options  -   354,839 
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and warrants      
Weighted average shares – diluted  195,053,401   194,352,745   196,997,906   197,997,906 
                
Net income (loss) per common share:        
Net loss per common share:        
Basic and Diluted $(0.00) $0.00  $(0.00) $(0.00)

 

There were no adjustments to net income (loss)loss required for purposes of computing diluted earnings per share. At June 30, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Company excluded the outstanding securities summarized below, which entitle the holders thereof to acquire shares of common stock, from its calculation of its diluted earnings per share, as their effect would have been antidilutive.anti-dilutive.

 

 June 30, 2017  June 30, 2016  June 30, 2020 June 30, 2019
Options  11,685,852   12,241,153   11,000,000   11,000,000 
Warrants  75,926,510   64,326,510   87,696,511   79,263,176 

Concentrations

During the year ended June 30, 2020 we recorded revenues of 53% from GEA, 45% Desmet and 2% EW, compared to 97% of recorded revenues from Desmet an 3% EW in Fiscal 2019. from (see Note 2).

At June 30, 2020, 100% of accounts receivable were due from Desmet.

Segment

As of June 30, 2020, the Company operated one reportable business segment. In accordance with the “Segment Reporting” Topic of the ASC, the Company’s chief operating decision maker has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire Company. Existing guidance, which is based on a management approach to segment reporting, establishes requirements to report selected segment information quarterly and to report annually entity-wide disclosures about products and services, major customers, and the countries in which the entity holds material assets and reports revenue. All material operating units qualify for aggregation under “Segment Reporting” due to their similar customer base and similarities in: economic characteristics; nature of products and services; and procurement, manufacturing and distribution processes. Since the Company operates in one segment, all financial information required by “Segment Reporting” can be found in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

24

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The adoption of this pronouncement could affect the timing of the recognition of the Company’s revenues related to the gross profit share from the sale of reactors by our distributor to the end customer. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09 on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

In FebruaryJune 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards UpdateASU No. 2016-02,2016-13, LeasesCredit Losses - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASC 326”). ASU 2016-022016-13 requires entities to use a lesseeforward-looking approach based on current expected credit losses (“CECL”) to record a rightestimate credit losses on certain types of use asset and a corresponding lease liability onfinancial instruments, including trade receivables. This may result in the balance sheetearlier recognition of allowances for all leases with terms longer than 12 months.losses. ASU 2016-022016-13 is effective for all interimthe Company beginning January 1, 2023, and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018.early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe the potential impact of the new guidance and related codification improvements will be material to its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity. ASU 2020-06 will simplify the accounting for convertible instruments by reducing the number of accounting models for convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock. Limiting the accounting models will result in fewer embedded conversion features being separately recognized from the host contract as compared with current GAAP. Convertible instruments that continue to be subject to separation models are (1) those with embedded conversion features that are not clearly and closely related to the host contract, that meet the definition of a derivative, and that do not qualify for a scope exception from derivative accounting and (2) convertible debt instruments issued with substantial premiums for which the premiums are recorded as paid-in capital. ASU 2020-06 also amends the guidance for the derivatives scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity to reduce form-over-substance-based accounting conclusions. ASU 2020-06 will be effective July 1, 2024, for the Company. Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective transition approachpermitted, but no earlier than July 1, 2021, including interim periods within that year. Management is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is in the process ofcurrently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-02 on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

23

In July 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Non-controlling Interests with a Scope Exception ("ASU 2017-11"). ASU 2017-11 allows companies to exclude a down round feature when determining whether a financial instrument (or embedded conversion feature) is considered indexed to the entity's own stock. As a result, financial instruments (or embedded conversion features) with down round features may no longer be required to be accounted for as derivative liabilities. A company will recognize the value of a down round feature only when it is triggered and the strike price has been adjusted downward. For equity-classified freestanding financial instruments, an entity will treat the value of the effect of the down round as a dividend and a reduction of income available to common shareholders in computing basic earnings per share. For convertible instruments with embedded conversion features containing down round provisions, entities will recognize the value of the down round as a beneficial conversion discount to be amortized to earnings. ASU 2017-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance in ASU 2017-11 can be applied using a full or modified retrospective approach. The adoption of ASU 2017-11 is2020-06 on the consolidated financial statements, but currently does not expected tobelieve ASU 2020-06 will have anya significant impact on the Company's financial statement presentation or disclosures.Company.

 

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.

Dependence on Desmet Ballestra

The Company’s revenue is entirely dependent on Desmet Ballestra who is its exclusive distribution agent with regard to theCTi Nano Neutralization® System for edible oils. During the year ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, 100% of the Company’s revenue was derived from Desmet (see Note 4).

 

Note 4 - Agreement2 – Contracts with Desmet BallestraCustomers

 

2012Desmet Ballestra Agreement

 

On May 14, 2012 the CompanyIn October 2018, we signed a three-year globalResearch R and Development,D, Marketing and Technology License Agreementwith Desmet for the n.v.sale and licensing of our reactors. This agreement is a continuation of an original agreement we signed with Desmet Ballestra Group s.a. (Desmet), a Belgian company that is actively marketing theNANO Neutralization System, the key component of which is the Company’s reactor to soybeanin fiscal 2012 and other vegetable oil refiners. The agreement provided Desmet (licensee) a limited, exclusive license and right to develop, design and supply Nano Reactor® systems which incorporate Nano Reactor® devices on a global basis but is limited to oils and fats and oleo chemical applications. The Company (licensor) remains owneramended in fiscal 2016. As part of the current patents and patent applications butOctober 2018 agreement, Desmet willagreed to provide us monthly advances of $50,000 through October 1, 2021 to be co-owner of any new process patent applications jointly developed. Desmet provided, under certain conditions, limited monthly advance payments of $125,000applied against our gross profit share from future sales to CTi through May 15, 2015. The agreement with Desmet expired in May 2015.sales.

 

Pursuant to the 2012 Agreement, theThe Company was recognizingrecognizes revenue from the sale of the reactors upon shipment and acceptance by Desmet, as the Company hadhas no further obligations to Desmet other than the reactor’s two-year standard warranty. In addition,accordance with ASC 606, the Company wasrecognizes the revenue from the sale of reactors at the time of shipment of the Nano reactor hardware as such shipment is deemed to be the Company’s only performance obligation and the Company has no more continuing obligation. Desmet pays for such reactors on credit terms and the amount of the sale is recorded as a receivable upon acceptance by Desmet.

25

The Company also entitled toreceives a non-refundable share in gross profit, as defined, from the sale of Desmet’s integrated neutralization system to its customercustomers of which the reactors are an integral component. Such revenues were recognized upon shipmentamount is subject to adjustment based on certain factors including cost overruns. The Company has no control with regards to the sale and installation of Nano Reactor® and CTi Nano Neutralization® System, between Desmet and the end customer. In accordance with ASC 606, the Company has determined that the gross profit to be earned from Desmet is variable consideration, and evaluates the amount of the reactors to Desmet as these amounts were fixedpotential payments and the Company had no further obligation or commitmentlikelihood that the payments will be received using the most likely amount approach (subject to the variable consideration constraint). Estimates are available from our distributor which are considered in the installationdetermination of the integrated neutralization systemmost likely amount. However, given the lack of control over the sale to Desmet’sthe end customer other thanand the reactors warranty.lack of history of prior sales, the Company considered these as variable revenue constraints, and as such, the amount of revenue recognized is limited to the actual amount of cash received under the contract which the Company has determined is not refundable and probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur. Further, Company has been able to develop an expectation of the actual collection based on its historical experience.

 

During the year ended June 30, 20162020, the Company recorded revenues from reactor sales of $420,001$483,000 from Nano Reactor® sales and $266,000 from gross profit share of $1,200,700 orfor a total revenue of $1,620,701 pursuant to the 2012 agreement.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had no further obligations to Desmet under this agreement. There were no revenues recorded under this agreement in fiscal 2017.

2016 Agreement

On January 22, 2016, the Company signed a similar three-year agreement with Desmet effective August 1, 2015. In addition for the payment upon shipment of the nano reactors, Desmet agreed to provide monthly advance payments of $50,000 to be applied against gross profit share earned by the Company on installation of the nano reactors by Desmet to its customers. The agreement expires in August 2018 or may be terminated by Desmet every August 1 should Desmet and its affiliates fail to convert a minimum of six Nano Reactors systems to sold status during the period of June 1 to May 31. The agreement may also be terminated in case the Company were to lose its rights under the patents and patent applications being used in the Company’sCTi NANO Neutralization System.

24

Revenue from the sale of ourNano Reactor® systems is being recognized when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists; shipment has occurred, including transfer of title and risk of loss for product sales, services have been rendered for service revenues; the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectability was reasonably assured.  We are also entitled to a profit share from our distributor from the sale of the reactors to their customers.  Pursuant to the January 2016 agreement with the Company’s distributor, the profit share is not fixed at the time of delivery, and as such, revenue is recognized when the profit share is fixed and determinable, which is generally be upon delivery and installation of the NANO Neutralization System by the distributor to its customer.

During the year ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded revenues of $177,516 from reactor sales and received $500,000 of advance payments pursuant to the 2016 agreement. As of June 30, 2016, $63,750 of the recorded revenues was not yet collected, as such, for financial reporting purposes the Company deducted this amount from the advance payments received which resulted in a net balance of $436,250 in advances$749,000 from Desmet.

 

During the year ended June 30, 2017,2019, the Company recorded revenuessales of $895,000$533,000 from reactorNano Reactor® sales and $168,054$517,000 from gross profit share for a total revenue of $1,063,054 and received $500,000 of advance payments pursuant to the 2016 agreement. $1,050,000.

As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, advances received from Desmet related to the Company’s share in gross profit amounted to $367,000 and $33,000, respectively. These advances will only be recognized as revenues once the condition for revenue recognition have been met.

GEA Westfalia Agreement

In January 2017 $85,000the Company entered into a global technology license, R&D and marketing agreement with GEA Westfalia (GEA). Under the agreement, GEA was granted a worldwide exclusive license to integrate our patented technology into water treatment application, milk and juice pasteurization, and certain food related processes. The agreement with GEA was for three years, and provided for non-refundable payments of $300,000 per year that were to be applied to future license fees, or the Company’s share of gross profit from the sale of GEA’s system to its customers. From January 2017 through December 2019, the Company received total non-refundable payments of $877,000 from GEA. For the years ending June 30, 2017 through June 30, 2019, the Company accounted for these payments as advances from distributors in the consolidated balance sheet as they represent deferred profit sharing revenue in anticipation of future sales of the recorded revenues was not yet collected, as such, for financial reporting purposesCompany’s reactors to GEA. The agreement with GEA expired in December 2019 and during the term of the agreement, the Company deducted this amountdid not sell any reactors to GEA. The Company determined that its performance obligation to provide reactors to GEA had expired based on terms of the agreement. Accordingly, for the year ending June 30, 2020, the Company recognized the $877,000 of non-refundable payments received in 2017 to 2019 as revenue.

Enviro Watertek, LLC Agreement

In April 2019, the Company entered into a licensing and service contract agreement with Enviro Watertek, LLC (“EW”). This agreement covers the Company’s industrial treatment process for produced and frack water. The Company’s Low Pressure Nano Reactor (LPN), was specifically developed to be integrated into frack water treatment system along with proprietary chemical formulations, and has depicted measurable and quantifiable advantages over industry standard processes and equipment. The agreement with EW provides for sales on Nano Reactors® plus recurring revenue stream based on processing frack water volumes and utilization or usage fees. Our agreement with EW is for a period of 15 years but can be terminated by either party every anniversary.

Revenues from sale of reactors is recognized upon shipment of the reactors while usage fees from processing of frack water volumes and utilization will only be recognized upon actual usage and collectability is deemed certain.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company recognized $5,000 from sale of reactors and usage fees of $33,000 for a total of $38,000. During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company recognized $40,000 from sale of reactors. There were no usage fees recognized in 2019.

26

Note 3 – Operating Lease

The Company leases certain warehouse and corporate office space under an operating lease agreement. We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Lease assets are presented as operating lease right-of-use assets and the related liabilities are presented as lease liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.

Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the advancelease. Generally, the implicit rate of interest in lease arrangements is not readily determinable and the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate in determining the present value of lease payments. The Company’s incremental borrowing rate is a hypothetical rate based on its understanding of what its credit rating would be. The operating lease ROU asset includes any lease payments received which resulted in a net balancemade and excludes lease incentives.

The components of $748,819 in advances from Desmet.lease expense and supplemental cash flow information related to leases for the period are as follows:

  June 30, 2020
Lease costs:  
Operating lease (included in general and administrative in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations) $73,000 
     
Other information    
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities $69,000 
     
Weighted average remaining lease term – operating leases (in years)  4.6 
Average discount rate – operating leases  4% 
     
The supplemental balance sheet information related to leases for the period is as follows:    
Long-term right-of-use assets $308,000 
     
Short-term operating lease liabilities $54,000 
Long-term operating lease liabilities  258,000 
Total operating lease liabilities $312,000 

Maturity of the Company’s lease liabilities are as follows:

Year Ending June 30: Operating Lease
2021  $71,000 
2022   72,000 
2023   75,000 
2024   78,000 
2025 and thereafter   47,000 
Total lease payments   343,000 
Less: Imputed interest/present value   (31,000)
Present value of lease liabilities  $312,000 

27

 

Note 54 - Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment consistsconsist of the following as of June 30, 20172020 and June 30, 2016:2019:

 

 June 30, June 30,  June 30, June 30,
 2017  2016  2020 2019
         
Leasehold improvement $2,475  $2,475  $2,000  $2,000 
Furniture  26,837   26,837   27,000   27,000 
Office equipment  1,499   1,499   2,000   2,000 
Equipment  68,380   68,380   356,000   306,000 
Systems  408,155   352,655   187,000   187,000 
  507,346   451,846   574,000   524,000 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization  (366,740)  (329,205)  (498,000)  (459,000)
Property and equipment, net $140,606  $122,641  $76,000  $65,000 

 

Depreciation expense for the years ended June 30, 20172020 and 20162019 amounted to $37,535$39,000 and $39,296,$41,000, respectively and was reportedrecorded as part of General and administrativeAdministrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

Note 6 - 5 – Related Party Transactions

Accrued Payroll and Payroll Taxes

In prior periods, the Company accrued salaries and estimated payroll taxes due to Officerscurrent and former officers of the Company. As of June 30, 2019, total accrued payroll and payroll taxes-related parties amounted to $892,000. During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company reduced accrued payroll by $3,000. In addition, $196,000 due to a former officer was acquired from the former officer by Strategic IR (SIR), an unrelated party. The former officer, SIR, and the Company agreed that the amount of the accrued payroll $204,000, and the Company recorded a loss on the transfer of the liability to SIR of $8,000. As of June 30, 2020, accrued payroll and payroll taxes-related parties totaled $693,000.

Note 6 – Note Payable

On April 16, 2020, the Company received loan proceeds in the amount of $104,000 pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “Cares Act”), which was enacted on March 27, 2020. The note is scheduled to mature in April 2022 and has a 1% interest rate and is subject to the terms and conditions applicable to loans administered by the Small Business Administration (SBA) under the CARES Act. The Company applied ASC 470, Debt, to account for the PPP loan. The loan and accrued interest are forgivable as long as the Company uses the loan proceeds for eligible purposes, including payroll, benefits, rent and utilities, and maintains its payroll levels. Forgiveness of the note is only available for principal that is used for the limited purposes that qualify for forgiveness under SBA requirements, and that to obtain forgiveness, the Company must request it and must provide documentation in accordance with the SBA requirements, and certify that the amounts the Company is requesting to be forgiven qualify under those requirements. The Company also understands that it shall remain responsible under the note for any amounts not forgiven, and that interest payable under the note will not be forgiven but that the SBA may pay the loan interest on forgiven amounts.

 

As of June 30, 2017 and 2016,2020, the outstanding balance of the note payable amounted to $104,000. The Company is currently in the process of applying for forgiveness of the entire PPP loan with respect to these qualifying expenses, however, the Company had accrued unpaid salaries to officerscannot assure that such forgiveness of any portion of the PPP loan will occur. As for the potential loan forgiveness, once the PPP loan is, in part or wholly, forgiven and former officers amounting to $994,033.a legal release is received, the liability would be reduced by the amount forgiven and a gain on extinguishment would be recorded.

28

 

Note 7 - Stockholders’ Deficit

Common Stock

Year ended June 30, 2017

During the year ended June 30, 2017 the Company issued 2,800,000 shares of common stock valued at $112,000 to service providers and a director for services rendered. These shares were valued at fair value at the date of issuance.

Year ended June 30, 2016

On September 25, 2015, the Company issued 9,029,355 shares of common stock with a value of $812,633 pursuant to a settlement of notes payable in April 2014. These shares were reflected as Common Stock issuable in the accompanying Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit as of June 30, 2016. Such amounts were reclassified to additional paid in capital upon their issuance during the year ended June 30, 2016.

25

 

Preferred Stock

 

On March 17, 2009, the Company filed an Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and created two new series of preferred stock, the first of which is designated Series A Preferred Stock and the second of which is designated as Series B Preferred Stock. The total number of shares of Common Stock which this corporation has authority to issue is 1,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock of which 5,000,000 shares are designated as Series A Preferred Stock, and 5,000,000 shares are designated as Series B Preferred Stock, with the rights, preferences and privileges of the Series B Preferred Stock to be designated by the Board of Directors. Each share of Common Stock and Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.001.

As of June 30, 20172020, and 2016,2019, there are no shares of Series A or Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.

Common Stock

During the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 the Company did not issue any shares of common stock.

 

Stock Options

 

The Company has not adopted a formal stock option plan. However, it has assumed outstanding stock options resulting from the acquisition of its wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary, Hydrodynamic Technology, Inc. In addition, the Company has made periodic non- plannon-plan grants. A summary of the stock option activity from June 30, 20172020 and 20162019 is as follows:

      Weighted-
      Average
    Weighted Remaining
    Average Contractual
    Exercise Life
  Option Price (Years) 
       
Outstanding at June 30, 2018   11,378,754  $0.31   2.23 
- Granted          
- Forfeited          
- Exercised          
- Expired   (378,754)      
Outstanding at June 30, 2019   11,000,000  $0.03   3.36 
- Granted          
- Forfeited          
- Exercised          
- Expired           
Outstanding at June 30, 2020   11,000,000  $0.03   6.07 

During the year ended June 30, 2020, stock options granted in prior years to purchase 8,500,000 shares of common stock were modified to increase its expiration period to ten years. All other terms of the original grant did not change. As a result of this modification, the Company recorded stock compensation expense of $2,000 to account for the incremental change in fair value of these options before and after the modification based upon a Black-Scholes Option Pricing model.

 

        Weighted- 
        Average 
     Weighted-  Remaining 
     Average  Contractual 
     Exercise  Life 
  Options  Price  (Years) 
          
Outstanding June 30, 2015  12,810,957  $0.44   5.35 
- Granted  -   -   - 
- Forfeited  -   -   - 
- Exercised  -   -   - 
- Expired  (214,965)  -   - 
Outstanding at June 30, 2016  12,595,992  $0.44   4.96 
- Granted  -   -   - 
- Forfeited  -   -   - 
- Exercised  -   -   - 
- Expired  (910,140)  -   - 
Outstanding at June 30, 2017  11,685,852  $0.37   2.41 
29

As of June 30, 2017 and 2016,2020, all outstanding options were fully vested and exercisable. The intrinsic value of the outstanding options as of June 30, 20172020 was $110,000. zero as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the trading price of the Company’s stock.

The following table summarizes additional information concerning options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2017.2020.

 

  Options Outstanding  Options Exercisable 
     Weighted  Weighted     Weighted 
     Average  Average     Average 
Exercise Number  Remaining  Exercise  Number  Remaining 
Price of Shares  Life (Years)  Price  of Shares  Life (Years) 
                
$0.03  11,000,000   5.36  $0.03   11,000,000   5.36 
$0.33  174,022   0.89  $0.33   174,022   0.89 
$0.67  511,830   0.97  $0.67   511,830   0.97 
   11,685,852           11,685,852     

26
     Options Outstanding   Options Exercisable 
         Weighted   Weighted       Weighted 
         Average   Average       Average 
 Exercise   Number   Remaining   Exercise   Number   Remaining 
 Price   of Shares   Life (Years)   Price   of Shares   Life (Years) 
                       
$0.03   11,000,000   6.07  $0.01   11,000,000   6.07 

 

Warrants

 

A summary of the Company’s warrant activity and related information from as of June 30, 20172020 and 20162019 is as follows.

  

      Weighted-
      Average
    Weighted- Remaining
    Average Contractual
    Exercise Life
  Warrants Price (Years)
       
Outstanding at June 30, 2018  75,926,510  $0.06   3.81 
Granted  4,336,666   0.03   4.49 
Exercised           
Expired  (1,000,000)        
Outstanding at June 30, 2019  79,263,176   0.07   4.45 
Granted  9,800,000   0.03   10.00 
Exercised           
Expired  (1,366,665)        
Outstanding at June 30, 2020  87,696,511  $0.07   5.64 

        Weighted- 
        Average 
     Weighted-  Remaining 
     Average  Contractual 
     Exercise  Life 
  Warrants  Price  (Years) 
          
Outstanding at June 30, 2015  68,259,843  $0.07   5.77 
Granted  -         
Exercised  -         
Expired  (3,933,333)        
Outstanding at June 30, 2016  64,326,510  $0.07   5.09 
Granted  11,600,000   0.03   7.5 
Exercised  -         
Expired  -         
Outstanding at June 30, 2017  75,926,510  $0.06   4.81 

During the year ended June 30, 2020, stock warrants granted in prior years to purchase 27,100,000 shares of common stock were modified to increase its expiration period to ten years. All other terms of the original grant did not change. As a result of this modification, the Company recorded stock compensation expense of $5,000 to account for the incremental change in fair value of these warrants before and after the modification based upon a Black-Scholes Option Pricing model.

 

In January of 2017,

30

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company issuedgranted warrants to purchase 11,600,0004,336,666 shares of common stock to Directors, Officers, employees and consultants.consultants for services rendered. The warrants are fully vested, exercisable at $0.03 per share, vesting immediately and expiringwill expire in 10 years from the grant date.five years. Total fair value of these warrants at grant date was $453,000 using theamounted to $115,000 based upon a Black-Scholes Option Pricing model withmodel. In addition, the following average assumptions:Company amended certain warrants granted in prior years to purchase approximately 19 million common shares in order to extend the term or life to five years. As a result of this modification, the Company recorded stock pricecompensation expense of $0.04 per share, estimated life$334,000 to account for the incremental change in fair value of 7.5 years; risk free interest rate of 2.15%; volatility of 173%,these warrants before and dividend yield of 0%.after the modification based upon a Black-Scholes Option Pricing model.

 

As of June 30, 2017 and 2016,2020, all outstanding warrants were fully vested and exercisable. The intrinsic value of the outstanding warrants as of June 30, 20172020 was $116,000. zero as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the trading price of the Company’s stock.

The following table summarizes additional information concerning warrants outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2017.2020.

 

 Warrants Outstanding  Warrants Exercisable    Warrants Outstanding  Warrants Exercisable 
    Weighted Weighted     Weighted      Weighted   Weighted     Weighted 
    Average Average     Average      Average   Average     Average 
Exercise Number Remaining Exercise Number Exercise    Number   Remaining   Exercise   Number   Exercise 
Price of Shares  Life (Years)  Price  of Shares  Price    of Shares   Life (Years)   Price   of Shares   Price 
                                
0.03 - 0.07  55,599,851   6.75  $0.05   55,599,851  $0.05 
0.12  20,326,659   3.25  $0.12   20,326,659  $0.12 
$0.03 - $0.05   68,736,518   7.80  $0.04   68,736,518  $0.04 
$0.12   18,959,993   3.49  $0.12   18,959,993  $0.12 
  75,926,510           75,926,510        87,696,511           87,696,511     

The fair value of the warrant awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes method based on the following weighted-average assumptions:

  June 30, June 30,
  2020 2019
     
Risk-free interest rate  0.56%   2.60% 
Contractual terms (years)  6.75   4.82 
Expected volatility  264%   138% 
Expected dividend yield  0%   0% 

The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of measurement corresponding with the expected term of the award; the contractual term represents the weighted-average period of time the awards granted are expected to be outstanding giving consideration to vesting schedules, contractual terms, and historical participant exercise behavior; the expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of the Company’s Common Stock; and the expected dividend yield is based on the fact that the Company has not paid dividends in the past and does not expect to pay dividends in the future.

31

 

Note 8 - Income Taxes

 

TotalFor the year ended June 30, 2020 the Company recorded no provision for income tax expense differedtaxes due to available Federal net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards of approximately $9.8 million that are available to reduce taxable income. For the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company has no provision for income taxes due to net losses incurred.

Deferred income taxes result from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. Federal and state income tax rate before income tax expense as a result of the NOL carry forward. Therefore, the Company’s effective tax rate is 0.0%. The Company files income tax returnstemporary differences in the United States (“Federal”)recognition of income and California (“State”) jurisdictions.expenses for the financial reporting purposes and for tax purposes. The Company is subject to Federal and State incomecomponents of deferred tax examinations by tax authorities for all years since its inception.assets are presented below.

 

At June 30, 2017,2020, the Company had available Federal and State net operatingNOL carryforwards of approximately $9.8 million that are available to reduce future taxable income. The Federal carryforward expires in 2036. The NOL is subject to statutory limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 regarding substantial changes in ownership of companies with loss carry forwards available to offset future taxable income of approximately $10 million. These carry forwards will begin to expire inforwards.

During the year endingended June 30, 2018 through 2023, subject2020 and 2019, management has determined that it is more likely than not that the Company will not be able to IRS limitations, including change in ownership.

The Company periodically evaluatesrealize the likelihoodtax benefit of the realization ofcarryforwards due to recurring operating losses. Based on their evaluation, the Company determined that the net deferred tax assets, do not meet the requirements to realize, and adjustsas such, the carrying amount of the deferred tax assets byCompany has provided a full valuation allowance to the extent the future realization of the deferred tax assets is not judged to be more likely than not. The Company considers many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of our deferred tax assets, including recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income or loss, the carry-forward periods available to us for tax reporting purposes, and other relevant factors.against them.

27

 

At June 30, 2017, based on2029 and 2019, significant component of the weight of available evidence, including cumulative losses in recent years and expectations of future taxable income, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that itsCompany’s deferred tax assets of approximately $4.4 million would not be realized. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for 100% of its cumulative deferred tax assets. The components of our deferred tax assetsand liabilities are as follows.follows:

 

 June 30, June 30,  June 30, June 30,
 2017  2016  2020 2019
Net Operating loss carryforwards  $4,118,000  $3,585,000  $2,620,000  $2,827,000 
Stock compensation expense   957,000   725,000   840,000   783,000 
Amortization of Patents   69,000   58,000 
Reserve for Obsolete Inventory   68,000   68,000 
Total net deferred tax assets   5,212,000   4,436,000 
Total deferred tax assets   3,460,000   3,610,000 
Less valuation discount   (5,212,000)  (4,436,000)  (3,460,000)  (3,610,000)
Net deferred tax assets $-  $-  $  $ 

  

A reconciliation of the difference between the expense andeffective income taxes as thetax to statutory US federal income tax areis as follows:

 

 June 30, June 30,  June 30, June 30,
 2017  2016  2020 2019
Federal statutory rate   (34)%  34%  (21)%   (21)% 
State income taxes   (7)%  7%
State income taxes, net of Federal benefit  (7)%   (7)% 
Net operating loss/carryforward   41%  (41)%  28 %   28 % 
Income tax provision   -   -       

 

AsAccounting rules prescribes a result of the implementation of certain provisions of ASC 740-10, the Company performed an analysis of its previousrecognition threshold that a tax filings and determined that there were no positions taken that it considered uncertain. Therefore, there were no unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2017.

Future changesposition is required to meet before being recognized in the unrecognized tax benefit are not expected to have an impactfinancial statements and provides guidance on the effective tax rate due to the existence of the valuation allowance.recognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition issues. The Company estimates that the unrecognized tax benefit will not change within the next twelve months. The Company will continue to classify income taxclassifies interest and penalties and interest, if any, as parta component of interest and other expenses in its consolidated statements of operations. There isexpenses. To date, there have been no interest or penalties accrued asassessed or paid.

32

The Company measures and records uncertain tax positions by establishing a threshold for the financial statement recognition and measurement of June 30, 2017.a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Only tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date may be recognized or continue to be recognized.

 

The following summarizes the open tax years for each major jurisdiction:

 

Jurisdiction  Open Tax Years
   
Federal  2013 - 20172014 – 2019
California  2012 - 20172014 – 2019

 

The Company’s net operating loss carry forwards are subject to IRS examination until they are utilized and such tax years are closed.

 

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies

Lease Agreement

The Company leases approximately 5,000 square feet of office and warehouse space under a non-cancellable operating lease agreement through February 1, 2018.  Monthly payments are approximately $5,000 per month. The Company has a security deposit of $9,500 associated with this lease. Future minimum lease payments under our non-cancelable operating lease through February 2018 are $35,000.

Total rent expense was $64,822 and $53,359 for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and was reported as part of General and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations,

28

 

Royalty Agreements

 

On July 1, 2008, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary entered into Patent Assignment Agreements with two parties, its President as well as its former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and current Technology Senior Manager, where certain devices and methods involved in the hydrodynamic cavitation processes invented by the President and former CEO/ current Technology Senior Manager have been assigned to the Company.  In exchange, the Company agreed to pay a royalty of 5% of gross revenues to each of the President and former CEO/ current Technology Senior Manager for licensing of the technology and leasing of the related equipment embodying the technology. These agreements were subsequently assigned to Cavitation Technologies on May 13, 2010. The Company’s former CEO/ current Technology Senior Manager and President both waived their rights to receive royalty payments that have accrued, or that may accrue, on any gross revenue generated through June 30, 2017.2020 and 2019.

 

On April 30, 2008 (as amended November 22, 2010), the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary entered into an employment agreement with the Director of Chemical and Analytical Department (the “Inventor”) providing that the Inventor shall receive an amount equal to 5% of actual gross royalties received from the royalty stream in the first year in which the Company receives royalty payments from the patent which the Inventor was the legally named inventor, and 3% of actual gross royalties received by the Company resulting from the patent in each subsequent year. As of June 30, 2017,2020, and 2019, no patents have been granted in which this person is the legally named inventor.

Litigation

The Company may be involved in certain legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of its business. Except for income tax contingencies (commencing April 1, 2009), the Company records accruals for contingencies to the extent that management concludes that the occurrence is probable and that the related amounts of loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal expenses associated with the contingency are expensed as incurred.

In August 2014, a former employee and former Director filed an administrative Complaint for approximately $179,000 in unpaid wages, plus penalties and interest, with the California Labor Commissioner’s Office (CLCO).  In January 2016, the CLCO ruled in favor of the Company and dismissed the case. As a result of this ruling, the Company’s obligation to the former employee and former Director only amounted to approximately $131,000 which was already accrued in prior periods and included as part of Accrued Payroll and payroll taxes due to officers in the accompanying balance sheet.

In February 2016, the former employee and former Director appealed this ruling to the Los Angeles County Superior Court.  In addition to defending itself, the Company also has filed a cross-complaint against the former employee and former Director for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty as a Director. 

In October 2017, the Company settled the lawsuit with the Plaintiff for $30,000. Upon payment of the settlement amount, the Complaint and Cross-complaint between the Company and the Plaintiff will be dismissed with prejudice.  As a result, the Company will record a gain of $101,000 in October 2017 to extinguish the remaining accrual upon payment of the settled amount of $30,000.

 

Note 10 - Subsequent Events

 

In January 2017, we signed a three-year global R&D, Marketing and Technology License Agreement with GEA Group, (GEA) covering certain processes and patented applications. This agreement providesJuly 2020, the Company executed a loan agreement with $25,000 monthly advances against future sales. This agreement may be terminatedthe U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) under the Economic Injury Disaster Loan program in the amount of $150,000. The loan is secured by either party on each anniversary date. In July 2017,all tangible and intangible assets of the Company received advances totaling $100,000 pursuant to this agreement.and payable over 30 years at an interest rate of 3.75% per annum. Installment payments, including principal and interest, will begin on July 2021.

33

.

ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

None.

 

ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

In accordance with rule 13a-15(a), our management must maintain disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) and (c), management must also evaluate the effectiveness of these disclosure control and procedures at the end of each fiscal year. As of June 30, 2017,2020, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2017.2020.

29

 

Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed under the supervision of our principal executive and principal financial officer, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

 

(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

 

(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

 

(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures, (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act)) as of the year ended June 30, 2017. Based on2020. Management conducted as assessment of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting are ineffective. Our management discovered certain conditions that we deemed to be material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in our internal controls, as follows:

 

·34A lack of accounting and finance resources as well as effective oversight by those in charge of governance resulted in insufficient controls over timely financial statement preparation and review as well as the preparation and review around accounting for certain complex transactions.

 

·The design of monitoring controls used to assess the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls is inadequate. We also do not have an adequate internal process to report deficiencies in internal control to management on a timely basis.

 

·A lack of control relating to the recognition of certain gross profit share earned upon delivery and acceptance to the end user by our distributor caused by improper communication between us and our distributor, which resulted in restatement of previously reported quarterly revenue.

The Company did not maintain an effective control environment, which is the foundation necessary for effective internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, the Company (i) had an insufficient number of personnel appropriately qualified to perform control design, execution and monitoring activities (ii) had an insufficient number of personnel with an appropriate level of U.S. GAAP knowledge and experience and ongoing training in the application of U.S. GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements commensurate with the Company’s financial reporting requirements; (iii) had inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; and (iv) did not formally document policies and controls to enable management and other personnel to understand and carry out their internal control responsibilities including the lack of closing checklists, budget-to-actual analyses, balance sheet variation analysis, proforma financial statements, and the usage of key spreadsheets for monitoring. Additionally, the Company did not have an adequate process in place to complete its testing and assessment of the design and operating effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in a timely manner.

 

We are in the continuous process of improving our internal control over financial reporting in an effort to eliminate these material weaknesses through improved supervision and training of our staff, but additional effort is needed to fully remedy these deficiencies.material weaknesses. We intend on hiringto hire the necessary staff to address the material weaknesses once additional capital is obtained which will allow full operations to commence. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

 

We have taken numerous steps to address the underlying causes of the material weaknesses in our internal control deficiencies,controls, primarily through the development and implementation of policies, improved processes and documented procedures, the retention of third-party experts and contractors, and the hiring of additional accounting personnel with technical accounting and inventory accounting experience.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 20172020 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Attestation

 

Pursuant to Item 308(b) of Regulation S-K, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Wall Street Reform Act), this report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. The Wall Street Reform Act permanently exempts small public companies from the requirement to obtain an external audit on the effectiveness of internal financial reporting controls.

 

ITEM 9B.  Other Information

 

None.

 

 3035 

 

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

 

Person Age  Position
       
Igor Gorodnitsky  5760  President, PEO, Secretary &and Director
Naum Voloshin  5457  Principal Accounting Officer
James Fuller  7780  Director
Gerald Bailey*76Director

·Resigned in September of 2017

 

Audit committee standing members consisted of Igor Gorodnitsky and James Fuller as of June 30, 2017.2020. We anticipate forming compensation, governance, and other committees as necessary.

 

Igor Gorodnitsky.Mr. Gorodnitsky has been our President and member of the Board of Directors since September 26, 2008, and he became the Company's Secretary and Principal Executive Officer in November of 2012. Mr. Gorodnitsky developed expertise in handling and processing hazardous waste material. As a Senior Haz-Mat Specialist, he coordinated and successfully completed more than 500 emergency response Haz-mat clean-ups over the past 20 years. He coordinated and supervised Haz Mat projects, emergency and routine spill clean-ups, and confined space entry tasks. He coordinated and scheduled manpower and purchased and scheduled equipment and materials for containment and treatment of spills. He successfully managed, coordinated and supervised projects including Hazscanning, sampling, lab-packing, manifesting, profiling, labeling, and other special procedures for a variety of commercial clients and municipalities. He is a chemist by training and holds numerous certifications and licenses including Hazwoper Training Program, Confined Space Entry and Gas Vapour HazCating, Certified Uniform Waste Manifest Training, Basic and Intermediate HazCating, On-Scene Incident Commander Emergency, Site Remediation Methods, Underground Storage Tank Removal, Health & Safety Supervisor Certification, Hazardous Certification, and Tosco Refinery Safety. Mr. Gorodnitsky was president of Express Environmental Corp. since its inception in 1980 until he sold his interest in January 2009. Based on his significant industry experience and management skills it was determined that Mr. Gorodnitsky should serve on the Company’s Board.

 

James Fuller. Mr. Fuller is an independent director and has been Chairman of our Audit Committee and Independent Financial Expert since February 2010. He was formerly a Vice President of the New York Stock Exchange and director of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. In addition to his over 30 years of experience in the securities markets, Mr. Fuller sat on the Board of Trustees of the University of California, Santa Cruz and previously served as Chairman of their Audit Committee and Independent Financial Expert. Jim is a partner at Baytree Capital Associates, LLC. He received his BS in Political Science from San Jose State University and his MBA from California State University - Fresno. Mr. Fuller also served as a Director of Propell Technologies Group, Inc (OTCQB: Propell), a public company engaged in oil and gas exploration from October 14, 2011 until February 17, 2015. Based on Mr. Fuller’s extensive experience in finance as well as his prior public company experience it was determined that Mr. Fuller should serve on the Company’s Board.

 

Naum Voloshin.Mr. Voloshin has over 2025 years of experience in investment banking, business operations and marketing. Prior to joining CTi, Mr. Voloshin has worked for several developmental stage companies in US, Europe and Asia. The scope of his duties was to provide management, supervision, business experiencefinancial reporting, funding, and marketing skills.expertise.

 

Family Relationships

 

Roman Gordon is a founder and current Global Technology ManagerManger of the Company. He was a former member of the Company’s Board of Directors and FounderChief Technology Officer up to July 15, 2016. He is aalso the brother of Mr. Igor Gorodnitsky.Gorodnitsky, President, Principal Executive Officer and member of the Company’s Board of Directors.

 

 

36

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our executive officers, directors, persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, and immediate family members living in the same household to file an Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership on Form 3 and changes in ownership on Form 4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Such "insiders" are required by SEC rules to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

 

31

Based on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us during fiscal 20162020 updated forms were filed, ended June 30, 2017,2019, there were no delinquent forms filed during the year.

 

Director Independence

 

Although our common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange, for purposes of independence we use the definition of independence applied by the NASDAQ stock market. The Board has determined that Messrs. Zotos andMr. Fuller are ”independent”is an” independent” in accordance with such definition. Messrs.Mr. Gorodnitsky and Gordon areis not independent due to theirhis current positions with the Company.

 

Code of Ethics

 

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all officers, directors and employees. A copy may also be obtained free of charge by mailing a request in writing to: Cavitation Technologies, Inc., 10019 Canoga Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311 USA. If we make any substantive amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or grant any waiver from a provision of the Code to any executive officer or director, we will promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver in a current report on Form 8-K.

 

ITEM 11. Executive Compensation.

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table sets forth a summary of cash and non-cash compensation awarded, earned or paid for services rendered to us during the years ended June 30, 20172020 and 20162019 by our “named executive officers,” consisting of (i) each individual serving as principal executive officer, during the year ended June 30, 2017, and (ii) our Chief Financial Officer/Chief Operating Officer, our other executive officer.

 

              Changes in                   Changes in     
              Pension                  Pension     
              Value and                 Non-Equity Value and     
            Non-Equity Non-Qualified All               Incentive Non-Qualified All   
        Stock Warrant Incentive Plan Deferred Other           Stock Warrant Plan Deferred Other   
 Year Salary  Bonus  Awards (1)  Awards  Compensation  Compensation  Compensation  Totals  Year Salary Bonus Awards (1) Awards Compensation Compensation Compensation Totals 
Igor Gorodnitsky * 2017 $169,000(1) $-   -  $120,000  $-  $-  $-  $289,000 
Igor Gorodnitsky 2020 $173,800(i) $  $ $ $ $ $173,800 
President, Principal Executive Officer 2016 $169,000(1) $-   -  $-  $-  $-  $-  $169,000  2019 $173,000(i) $  $ $ $ $ $173,000 
                                                     
Naum Voloshin 2017 $156,000(2) $-   -  $120,000  $-  $-  $-  $276,000  2020 $173,800(ii) $  $ $ $ $ $173,800 

Principal Accounting Officer

 2016 $97,000(2) $-   -  $-  $-  $-  $-  $97,000  2019 $173,000(ii) $  $ $ $ $ $173,000 
                                  
Roman Gordon *** 2017 $169,000(3) $-   -  $120,000  $-  $-  $-  $289,000 

Chief Technology Officer (Resigned)

 2016 $169,000(3) $-   -  $   $ - $-  $-  $169,000 

 

·Mr. Roman Gordon resigned as Chief Technology Officer

 

 3237 

 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

The table below reflects all outstanding equity awards made to each of the named executive officers that are outstanding as of June 30, 2017.  2020

  

    Option Awards          Option Awards     
    Number Number          Number   Number     
    of securities of securities          of securities   of securities     
    Underlying Underlying          Underlying   Underlying     
 Option/warrant Unexercised Unexercised Option/warrant Option/warrant   Option/warrant   Unexercised   Unexercised   Option/warrant   Option/warrant 
 grant Options/warrants Options/warrants Exercise expiration   grant   Options/warrants   Options/warrants   Exercise   expiration 
Name date  # Exercisable  # Unexercisable  Price  date   date   # Exercisable   # Unexercisable   Price   date 
                                        
Igor Gorodnitsky  12/18/2012   4,250,000   -  $0.05   12/18/2022   1/13/2017   3,000,000     $0.03   1/13/2027 
President and  3/20/2013   5,000,000   -  $0.04   3/20/2023   12/26/2019   3,000,000     $0.03   12/26/2029 
Principal Executive Officer  1/13/2017   3,000,000   -  $0.03   1/13/2027   5/18/2020   3,000,000     $0.045   5/18/2030 
                      5/18/2020   2,000,000     $0.03   5/18/2030 
Roman Gordon  12/18/2012   4,250,000   -  $0.05   12/18/2022 
Senior Technology Manager  3/20/2013   5,000,000   -  $0.04   3/20/2023 
  5/18/2020   3,000,000     $0.03   5/18/2030 
  1/13/2017   3,000,000   -  $0.03   1/13/2027   5/18/2020   1,250,000     $0.03   5/18/2030 
                                        
Naum Voloshin  10/10/2013   3,000,000   -  $0.04   10/10/2023   12/26/2019   3,000,000     $0.03   12/26/2029 
Principal Accounting Officer  1/13/2017   3,000,000   -  $0.03   1/13/2027   5/18/2020   3,000,000     $0.045   5/18/2030 
  5/18/2020   3,000,000     $0.03   5/18/2030 

 

The fair value of each option grant is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatility is calculated based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a term equal to the expected life of the options at the time of grant.

 

Employment Agreements

 

Our executive officers work as at-will employees.

 

Code Section 162(m) Provisions

 

Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, or the Code, generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the Chief Executive Officer or any of the four most highly compensated officers. Performance-based compensation arrangements may qualify for an exemption from the deduction limit if they satisfy various requirements under Section 162(m). Although we consider the impact of this rule when developing and implementing our executive compensation programs, we believe it is important to preserve flexibility in designing compensation programs. Accordingly, we have not adopted a policy that all compensation must qualify as deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code. While our stock options are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” (as defined by the Code), amounts paid under our other compensation programs may not qualify as such. 

 

 3338 

 

 

20162020 Director Compensation

 

The following table sets forth information for the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172019 regarding the compensation of our directors who at June 30, 20172020 were not also named executive officers.

 

 Fees       Non-equity         Fees     Non-equity       
 Earned       inventive Non-qualified       Earned     inventive Non-qualified     
 or paid Stock Option plan deferred All other     or paid Stock Option plan deferred All other   
 in cash Awards Awards compensation compensation compensation Total  in cash Awards Awards compensation compensation compensation Total 
Name ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  Earnings  ($)  ($)  ($) ($) ($) ($) Earnings ($) ($) 
                                           
James Fuller (1) $-  $8,000  $39,130  $-  $-  $-  $47,130  $ $   $  $ $ $ $  
Gerald Bailey (resigned) $-  $-  $15,652  $-  $-  $-  $15,652 
 $ $ $  $ $ $ $  

 

As of June 30, 20172020, the following table sets forth the number of aggregate outstanding option awards held by each of our directors who were not also named executive officers:

 

Name 

Aggregate

Number of

Option Awards

James Fuller  1,000,000 
Gerald Bailey400,000

 

ITEM 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

 

The following table provides information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of October 18, 2017,5, 2020, (the “Evaluation Date”) by: (i) each of our current directors, (ii) each of our named executive officers, and (iii) all such directors and executive officers as a group. We know of no other person or group of affiliated persons who beneficially own more than five percent of our common stock. The table is based upon information supplied by our officers, directors and principal stockholders and a review of Schedules 13D and 13G, if any, filed with the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the table and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe that each of the stockholders named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned.

 

Applicable percentages are based on 196,597,906196,997,906 shares outstanding as of the Evaluation Date, adjusted as required by rules promulgated by the SEC. These rules generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to those securities. In addition, the rules include shares of our common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options or warrants that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the Evaluation Date. These shares are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding those options for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person, but they are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

 

      Amount and    
      Nature of    
    Title of Beneficial  Percent of 
Name of Beneficial Owner   Class Ownership  Class (1) 
Igor Gorodnitsky (2) Common Stock  21,573,475   10.5%(3)
President , Principal Executive Officer, Director            
             
James Fuller (2) Common Stock  1,037,500   0.5%
Chairman of Audit Committee, Director            
             
Roman Gordon (2) Common Stock  27,938,475   13.6%(3)
Senior Technology Manager            
             
Naum Voloshin (2) Common Stock  6,000,000   3.0%
Principal Accounting Officer            
             
Gerald Bailey * (2) Common Stock  400,000   0.2%(5)
Director            
             
West Point Partners LLC (4) Common Stock  15,220,000   7.45%(4)
             
Directors and Officers   Common Stock  56,949,450   25.1%
(as a group, five individuals)            

*less than 1%

      Amount and  
      Nature of  
    Title of Beneficial Percent of
Name of Beneficial Owner   Class Ownership Class (1)
Igor Gorodnitsky  (2) Common Stock  5,000,000   2.54% 
President, Principal Executive Officer, Director              
               
James Fuller  (2)Common Stock  2,837,500   1.44% 
Chairman of Audit Committee, Director              
               
Naum Voloshin  (2) Common Stock  1,100,0000   .56% 
Principal Accounting Officer              
               
Directors and Officers     Common Stock  8.937,500   4.54% 
(as a group, three individuals)              

 

(1)Unless otherwise set forth below, the mailing address of Executive Officers, Directors and 5% or greater holders is c/oin care of the Company,

Igor Gorodnitsky

James Fuller

Jon Gruber >5% 

 

 3439 

 

ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

Certain Related Party Transactions

 

Since the beginning of our last fiscal year , there has not been, and there is not currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or will be a party in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years and in which any of our directors, executive officers, holders of more than five percent of any class of our voting securities or any member of the immediate family of the foregoing persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Accrued Payroll and Payroll Taxes

As of June 30, 2020, and 2019, the Company had accrued unpaid salaries to officers and former officers amounting to $897,000 and $892,000 respectively.

Cameo USA LLC

In fiscal 2014, Roman Gordon, one of the Company’s shareholders and a former officer, formed a company called Cameo USA LLC (Cameo). Since its formation, Cameo has had no revenue, no operations, and has had no assets or liabilities. On June 4, 2018, Mr. Gordon contributed his 100% interest in Cameo to the Company. As Mr. Gordon had no basis in his investment in Cameo, there was no value assigned to the contribution of Cameo. Subsequent to the contribution of Cameo to the Company, Cameo was sold to Alchemy Beverages Inc.

 

Director Independence

 

As our common stock is currently traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, we are not subject to the rules of any national securities exchange which require that a majority of a listed company's directors and specified committees of the board of directors meet independence standards prescribed by such rules. For the purpose of preparing the disclosures in this Report on Form 10-K regarding director independence, we have used the definition of "independent director" set forth in the Marketplace Rules of The NASDAQ, which defines an "independent director" generally as a person other than an executive officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company's board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Consistent with these standards, we believe that James Fuller is an Independent Financial Expert and independent director and that John Zotos is an independent director.Expert.

Roman Gordon is a brother of Mr. Igor Gorodnitsky

 

ITEM 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fee Summary

 

The following table provides information regarding the fees billed to us by Weinberg & Company, P.A. for the years ended June 30, 20172020 and 2016.2019. All fees described below were approved by the Board:

   

 

June 30,

2017

 

June 30,

2016

  

June 30,

2020

 

June 30,

2019

         
Audit Fees and Expenses (1) $68,140  $76,730  $96,000  $77,000 
Audit Related Fees (2)              
All Other Fees $19,409  $8,440  $7,000  $7,000 

 

(1)Audit fees and expenses were for professional services rendered for the audit and reviews of the consolidated financial statements of the Company, professional services rendered for issuance of consents and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC.

(2)The audit related fees were for professional services rendered for additional filing for registration statements and forms with the SEC.

40

 

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

 

Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility for appointing, setting compensation and overseeing the work of the independent registered public accounting firm. In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.

 

Prior to the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm for the next year’s audit, management will submit a list of services and related fees expected to be rendered during that year for audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other fees to the Audit Committee for approval.

 

 3541 

 

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K:

 

1.   Financial Statements

 

The financial statements are filed as part of this report under Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.

 

2.   Financial Statement Schedules

 

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is presented in the financial statements and notes thereto.

 

3.   Exhibits

 

The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are included in Item 15(b) below.

 

(b) - Exhibits. 

Exhibit   Filed   Incorporated by Reference
Number Exhibit Description Herewith Form Period Ended Exhibit Filing Date
             
3(i)(a) Articles of Incorporation - original name of Bioenergy, Inc.   SB-2 N/A 3.1 October 19, 2006
3(i)(b) Articles of Incorporation - Amended and Restated   10-Q December 31, 2008 3-1 February 17, 2009
3(i)(c) Articles of Incorporation - Amended and Restated   10-Q June 30, 2009 3-1 May 14, 2009
3(i)(d) Articles of Incorporation - Amended; increase in authorized shares   8-K N/A N/A October 29, 2009
3(i)(e) Articles of Incorporation - Certificate of Amendment; forward split   10-Q September 30, 2009 3-1 November 16, 2009
             
10.1 Patent Assignment Agreement between the Company and Roman Gordon dated July 1, 2008.   8-K June 30, 2009 10.1 May 18, 2010
10.2 Patent Assignment Agreement between the Company and Igor Gorodnitsky dated July 1, 2008.   8-K June 30, 2009 10.2 May 18, 2010
10.3 Assignment of Patent Assignment Agreement between the Company and Roman Gordon   8-K June 30, 2009 10.3 May 18, 2010
10.4 Assignment of Patent Assignment Agreement between the Company and Igor Gorodnitsky   8-K June 30, 2009 10.4 May 18, 2010
10.5 Employment Agreement between the Company and Roman Gordon date March 17, 2008   10-K/A June 30, 2009 10.3 October 20, 2011
10.6 Employment Agreement between the Company and Igor Gorodnitsky dated March 17, 2008   10-K/A June 30, 2009 10.4 October 20, 2011
10.7 Employment Agreement with R.L. Hartshorn dated Sept. 22, 2009   10-Q December 31, 2011 10.70 February 10, 2012
10.8 Employment and Confidentiality and Invention Assignment Agreement between the Company and Varvara Grichko dated April 30, 2008   10-Q December 31, 2010 10.3 February 11, 2011
10.9 Board of Director Agreement - James Fuller   10-Q December 31, 2011 10.12 October 20, 2011
10.10 Technology and License Agreement with Desmet Ballestra dated  May 14, 2012   10-K June 30, 2012 10.10 October 12, 2012
10.11 Convertible Note Payable - Prolific Group LLC - $25,000   10-Q December 31, 2011 10.40 February 10, 2012
10.12 Convertible Note Payable - Tripod Group LLC - $30,000   10-Q December 31, 2011 10.41 February 10, 2012
14.1 Code of Business Conduct and Ethics*   10-K June 30, 2011 14.1 September 28, 2011
31.1 Certificate of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 X        
31.2 Certificate of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 X        
32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. X        
Exhibit   Filed   Incorporated by Reference
Number Exhibit Description Herewith Form Period Ended Exhibit Filing Date
             
3(i)(a) Articles of Incorporation - original name of Bioenergy, Inc.   SB-2 N/A 3.1 October 19, 2006
3(i)(b) Articles of Incorporation - Amended and Restated   10-Q December 31, 2008 3-1 February 17, 2009
3(i)(c) Articles of Incorporation - Amended and Restated   10-Q June 30, 2009 3-1 May 14, 2009
3(i)(d) Articles of Incorporation - Amended; increase in authorized shares   8-K N/A N/A October 29, 2009
3(i)(e) Articles of Incorporation - Certificate of Amendment; forward split   10-Q September 30, 2009 3-1 November 16, 2009
             
10.1 Patent Assignment Agreement between the Company and Roman Gordon dated July 1, 2008.   8-K June 30, 2009 10.1 May 18, 2010
10.2 Patent Assignment Agreement between the Company and Igor Gorodnitsky dated July 1, 2008.   8-K June 30, 2009 10.2 May 18, 2010
10.3 Assignment of Patent Assignment Agreement between the Company and Roman Gordon   8-K June 30, 2009 10.3 May 18, 2010
10.4 Assignment of Patent Assignment Agreement between the Company and Igor Gorodnitsky   8-K June 30, 2009 10.4 May 18, 2010
10.5 Employment Agreement between the Company and Roman Gordon date March 17, 2008   10-K/A June 30, 2009 10.3 October 20, 2011
10.6 Employment Agreement between the Company and Igor Gorodnitsky dated March 17, 2008   10-K/A June 30, 2009 10.4 October 20, 2011

 

 

 3642 

 

 

10.7 Employment Agreement with R.L. Hartshorn dated Sept. 22, 2009   10-Q December 31, 2011 10.70 February 10, 2012
10.8 Employment and Confidentiality and Invention Assignment Agreement between the Company and Varvara Grichko dated April 30, 2008   10-Q December 31, 2010 10.3 February 11, 2011
10.9 Board of Director Agreement - James Fuller   10-Q December 31, 2011 10.12 October 20, 2011
10.10 Technology and License Agreement with Desmet Ballestra dated  May 14, 2012   10-K June 30, 2012 10.10 October 12, 2012
10.11 Convertible Note Payable - Prolific Group LLC - $25,000   10-Q December 31, 2011 10.40 February 10, 2012
10.12 Convertible Note Payable - Tripod Group LLC - $30,000   10-Q December 31, 2011 10.41 February 10, 2012
14.1 Code of Business Conduct and Ethics*   10-K June 30, 2011 14.1 September 28, 2011
31.1 Certificate of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 X        
31.2 Certificate of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 X        
32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. X        
32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. X         Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. X        
99.1 Loan Agreement - Desmet Ballestra - Oct. 26, 2010   10-Q September 30, 2010 99.1 November 12, 2010 Loan Agreement - Desmet Ballestra - Oct. 26, 2010   10-Q September 30, 2010 99.1 November 12, 2010
                        
101.INS XBRL Instance Document X         XBRL Instance Document X        
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema X         XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema X        
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase X         XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase X        
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase X         XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase X        
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase X         XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase X        
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase X         XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase X        
            
* In accordance with Regulation S-K 406 of the Securities Act of 1934, we undertake to provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of our “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics”. A copy may be requested by sending an email to info@cavitationtechnologies.com.          

*In accordance with Regulation S-K 406 of the Securities Act of 1934, we undertake to provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of our “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics”. A copy may be requested by sending an email to info@cavitationtechnologies.com.

 

(c) - Financial Statement Schedules

 

See Item (a) 2 above.

 

ITEM 16. SUMMARY. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

 

Not applicable

 

 3743 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THIS REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF OF THE REGISTRANT AND IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED

 

SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
     
/s/ Igor Gorodnitsky President; Member of Board of Directors November 3, 2017October 13, 2020
Igor Gorodnitsky (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/ N. Voloshin Chief Financial Officer 

November 3, 2017

October 13, 2020
N. Voloshin (Principal Financial Officer)  
     
/s/ James Fuller Audit Committee Chairman, 

November 3, 2017

October 13, 2020
James Fuller Independent Financial Expert  

 

 3844