Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x

Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31 2017., 2023.

 or

or

¨

Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period fromto.

Commission file number: 001-34833

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

    

Delaware

27-1537655

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

Identification No.)

1999 Harrison Street,1850 Mt. Diablo Boulevard, Suite 1530640

Oakland, Walnut Creek, California 9461294596

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(510) 522-9600

(510) 522-9600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Act.

Title of each class:

    

Shares

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of United States Agriculture Index Fund

NYSE Arca, Inc.each exchange
on which registered:

Shares of United States Commodity Index Fund

USCI

NYSE Arca, Inc.

Shares of United States Copper Index Fund

CPER

NYSE Arca, Inc.

(Title of each class)(Name of exchange on which registered)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NoneNone.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¨   Yes  x  No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ¨   Yes  x  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. xYes   ¨No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). xYes     ¨  No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”filer”, “accelerated filer,”filer”, “smaller reporting company,”company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filerAccelerated Filer

¨

Accelerated filerFiler

x

Non-accelerated filer

Non-Accelerated Filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting companyReporting Company

¨

 Emerging Growth Company

Emerging growth company

¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided in Section (7) a (2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.   Yes

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 13(a)12(b) of the Exchange Act.¨Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)Act.). ¨  Yes  x  No

The aggregate market value of the shares of each series of the registrant held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 20172023 and the number of outstanding shares of each series of the registrant as of March 12, 2018February 21, 2024 are included in the table below:

    

Aggregate Market Value of
Each Series’ Shares Held
by Non-Affiliates
as of June 30, 2023

    

Number of Outstanding Shares
as of February 21, 2024

United States Commodity Index Fund

 

$

166,298,582

2,750,000

United States Copper Index Fund

 

130,837,434

5,150,000

Total

 

$

297,136,016

7,900,000

  Aggregate Market Value of
Each Series’ Shares Held
by
Non-Affiliates
as of June 30, 2017
  Number of Outstanding
Shares as of
March 12, 2018
 
United States Commodity Index Fund $479,200,308   12,850,000 
United States Copper Index Fund  13,094,302   700,000 
United States Agriculture Index Fund  1,755,912    100,000 
Total $494,050,522    13,650,000 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

None.

UNITED STATES COMMODITY INDEX FUNDS TRUST 

Table of Contents

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Table of Contents

Part I

Page

Part I.

Item 1. Business.

2

1

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

36

39

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

47

57

Item 1C. Cybersecurity.

57

Item 2. Properties.

47

58

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

47

58

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

47

60

Part II.II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

48

61

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.[Reserved].

49

61

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

50

61

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

81

88

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

83

90

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements Withwith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

127

128

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

127

128

Item 9B. Other Information.

127

128

Part III.Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.

128

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

127

129

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

133

135

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

133

135

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

134

135

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

134

136

Part IV.IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

135

137

Exhibit Index.Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

135

138

Signatures.Exhibit Index.

137

136Signatures.

139


i

Part I

Item 1. Business.

What is the Trust and the Trust Series?

The United States Commodity Index Funds Trust (the “Trust”) is a Delaware Statutory Truststatutory trust formed on December 21, 2009. The Trust is a series trust formed pursuant to the Delaware Statutory Trust Act and is organized into fourthree separate series (each series, other than UCCO (defined below), a “Trust Series” and collectively, the “Trust Series”). As of December 31, 2017,2023, the Trust includes the United States Commodity Index Fund (“USCI”), a commodity pool formed on April 1, 2010 and first made available to the public on August 10, 2010, and the United States Copper Index Fund (“CPER”), a commodity pool formed on November 26, 2010 and first made available to the public on November 15, 2011, the United States Agriculture Index Fund (“USAG”), a commodity pool formed on November 26, 20102011. USCI and first made available to the public on April 13, 2012, and the USCF Canadian Crude Oil Index Fund (“UCCO”), which is currently in registration, and has not commenced operations.

The Trust and Trust Series maintain their main business offices at 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1530, Oakland, CA 94612. USCI, CPER and USAG each issues shares (“shares”) that may be purchased and sold on the NYSE Arca, Inc. (“NYSE Arca”).

The Trust, USCI, and each Trust SeriesCPER operate pursuant to the terms of the Trust’s Fourth Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement (the “Trust Agreement”), dated as of December 15, 2017 as amended from time to time, (the “Trust Agreement”), which grants full management control to their sponsor,2017. Wilmington Trust Company, a Delaware trust company, is the Delaware trustee of the Trust. The Trust, USCI and CPER are managed and controlled by United States Commodity Funds LLC (“USCF”).

USCF is a limited liability company formed in Delaware on May 10, 2005, that is registered as a commodity pool operator (“CPO”) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”). The Trust and Trust Series maintain their main business offices at 1850 Mt. Diablo Boulevard, Suite 640, Walnut Creek, California 94596.

USCI’s Investment Objective

USCI invests in futures contracts for commodities that are currently traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (the “NYMEX”), ICE Futures (“ICE Futures”), Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”), Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”), London Metal Exchange (“LME”), Commodity Exchange, Inc. (“COMEX”) or on other foreign exchanges (the NYMEX, ICE Futures, CBOT, CME, LME, COMEX and other foreign exchanges, collectively, the “Futures Exchanges”) (such futures contracts, collectively, “Futures Contracts”) and, to a lesser extent, in order to comply with regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, other commodity-based contracts and instruments such as cash-settled options on Futures Contracts, forward contracts relating to commodities, cleared swap contracts and other non-exchange traded over-the-counter (“OTC”) transactions that are based on the price of commodities and Futures Contracts (collectively, “Other Commodity-Related Investments”). Market conditions that USCF currently anticipates could cause USCI to invest in Other Commodity Related Investments would be those allowing USCI to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing. Futures Contracts and Other Commodity-Related Investments collectively are referred to as “Commodity Interests.”

The investment objective of USCI is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share net asset value (“NAV”) to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total ReturnSM (the “SDCI”), less USCI’s expenses. USCF does not intend to operate USCI in a fashion such that its per share NAV will equal, in dollar terms, the spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts (as defined below) that comprise the SDCI or the prices of any particular group of Futures Contracts. USCI will not seek to achieve its stated investment objective over a period of time greater than one day. USCI believes that it is not practical to manage the portfolio to achieve such an investment goal when investing in Futures Contracts and Other Commodity-Related Investments.

The SDCI is designed to reflect the performance of a diversified group of commodities. The SDCI is comprisedowned and maintained by SummerHaven Index Management, LLC (“SHIM”) and is calculated and published by Bloomberg L.P. Futures contracts for the commodities comprising the SDCI are traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”), ICE Futures (“ICE Futures”), Chicago Board of 14Trade (“CBOT”), Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”), London Metal Exchange (“LME”), and Commodity Exchange, Inc. (“COMEX” together with the NYMEX, ICE Futures, Contracts thatCBOT, CME, LME and COMEX, the “Futures Exchanges”) and are selected on a monthly basis from a list of 27 possible Futurescollectively referred to herein as “Futures Contracts. The Futures Contracts that at any given time make up the SDCI are referred to herein as “Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.” The SDCI is owned and maintainedrelative weighting of the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts will change on a monthly basis, based on quantitative formulas relating to the prices of the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts developed by SummerHaven Index Management, LLC (“SHIM”) and calculated and publishedSHIM.

USCI seeks to achieve its investment objective by Bloomberg, L.P. (“Bloomberg”). USCI invests firstinvesting primarily in the currentBenchmark Component Futures Contracts. Then, if constrained by regulatory requirements, risk mitigation measures, liquidity requirements, or in view of market conditions, USCI will invest next in other Futures Contracts based on the same commodity as the futures contracts subject to such regulatory constraints or market conditions, and finally, to a lesser extent, in other exchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts if one or more other Futures Contracts is not available. When USCI has invested to the fullest extent possible in exchange-traded futures contracts, USCI may then invest in other contracts and instruments based on the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, other Futures Contracts or the commodities included in the SDCI, such as cash-settled options, forward contracts, cleared swap contracts and swap contracts other than cleared swap contracts. Other exchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and other contracts and instruments based on the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts are collectively referred to as “Other Commodity-Related Investments,” and together with Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and other Futures Contracts, intended“Commodity Interests.”

USCI seeks to replicateachieve its investment objective by investing so that the returnaverage daily percentage change in USCI’s NAV for any period of 30 successive valuation days will be within plus/minus 10 percent (10%) of the average daily percentage change in the price of the SDCI over the same period. USCF believes that the market arbitrage opportunities will cause the daily changes in USCI’s share price on the currentNYSE Arca on a percentage basis to closely track the daily changes in USCI’s per share NAV on a percentage basis. USCF believes that the net effect of this expected relationship and the expected relationship described above between USCI’s per share NAV and the SDCI will be that the daily changes in the price of USCI’s shares on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis will closely track the daily changes in the SDCI on a percentage basis, less USCI’s expenses. While USCI is composed of Benchmark Component Futures

1

Contracts and thereafter may hold Futures Contracts inis therefore a particular commodity other than one specified asmeasure of the prices of the corresponding commodities comprising the SDCI for future delivery, there is nonetheless expected to be a reasonable degree of correlation between the SDCI and the cash or spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component Futures Contract,Contracts.

Investors should be aware that USCI’s investment objective is not for its NAV or may hold Other Commodity-Related Investments that are intendedmarket price of shares to replicateequal, in dollar terms, the return onspot prices of the Benchmark Futures Contracts, but may fail to closely track the SDCI’s total return movements. If USCI increases in size, due to its obligations to comply with regulatory limits or due to other market pricing or liquidity factors, USCI may invest in Futures Contract months other than the designated month specified ascommodities underlying the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts or the prices of any particular group of futures contracts. USCI will not seek to achieve its stated investment objective over a period of time greater than one day. This is because natural market forces called contango and backwardation have impacted the total return on an investment in Other Commodity-Related Investments, which may have the effect of increasing transaction related expenses and may result in increased tracking error.

USCI’s shares began trading on August 10, 2010.during the past year relative to a hypothetical direct investment in the various commodities and, in the future, it is likely that the relationship between the market price of USCI’s shares and changes in the spot prices of the underlying commodities will continue to be so impacted by contango and backwardation. (It is important to note that the disclosure above ignores the potential costs associated with physically owning and storing the commodities, which could be substantial). As of December 31, 2017,2023, USCI held 1,794813 Futures Contracts on the NYMEX, 3,297held 1,308 Futures Contracts on the ICE Futures, 1,573held 918 Futures Contracts on the CBOT, 1,225held 182 Futures Contracts on the CME, 6,796held 1,360 Futures Contracts on the LME and 701held 185 Futures Contracts on the COMEX.

CPER’s Investment Objective

The investment objective of CPER is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share NAV to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the SummerHaven Copper Index Total ReturnSM (the “SCI”), less CPER’s expenses. USCF does not intend to operate CPER in a fashion such that its per share NAV will equal, in dollar terms, the spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts (as defined below) that comprise the SCI or the prices of any particular group of Futures Contracts. CPER will not seek to achieve a stated investment objective over a period of time greater than one day. USCF believes that it is not practical to manage the portfolio to achieve such an investment goal when investing in Futures Contracts and Other Copper-Related Investments (as defined below).

The SCI is designed to reflect the performance of the investment returns from a portfolio of copper futures contracts.contracts on the Commodity Exchange, Inc. exchange (“COMEX”). The SCI is owned and maintained by SHIMSummerHaven Index Management, LLC (“SHIM”) and calculated and published by the NYSE Arca. The SCI is comprised of either twoone or three Eligible Copper Futures Contracts that are selected on a monthly basis based on quantitative formulas relating to the prices of the Eligible Copper Futures Contracts developed by SHIM. The Eligible Copper Futures Contracts that at any given time make up the SCI are referred to herein as “Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts.”


CPER seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing to the fullest extent possibleprimarily in the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts. Then, if constrained by regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, CPER willmay also, to a lesser extent, invest next in other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts and finally to a lesser extent, in other exchange traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar tobeyond the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts if one or more other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts is not available. When CPER has invested to the fullest extent possible in exchange-traded futures contracts, CPER may then invest in other contracts and instruments based on the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts or copper, such as cash-settled options, forward contracts, cleared swap contracts and swap contracts other than cleared swap contracts. Other exchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, as well as other investments based on copper, such as cash-settled options on Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, forward contracts for copper, cleared swap contracts, non-cleared “over-the-counter” or “OTC” transactions that are based on the price of copper and other contractsBenchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts and instrumentsindices based on the foregoing (collectively, “Other Copper-Related Investments”). The following factors, among others, may be considered when determining CPER’s investments in Eligible Copper Futures Contracts or in Other Copper-Related Investments: regulatory requirements, risk mitigation measures taken by CPER, CPER’s FCMs, counterparties or other market participants, liquidity and market conditions. Other factors that may impact CPER’s investments in other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts, other exchange-traded futures contracts, or Other Copper-Related Investments include allowing CPER to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing. In addition, CPER may need to hold significant portions of its portfolio in cash beyond what it has historically held for reasons including (but not limited to) the need to address the changes in market conditions, regulatory requirements or risk mitigation measures or the need to satisfy potential margin requirements. For convenience and unless otherwise specified, Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts and Other Copper-Related Investments collectively are referred to as “Copper Interests.”

CPER seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing so that the average daily percentage change in CPER’s NAV for any period of 30 successive valuation days will be within plus/minus 10 percent (10%) of the average daily percentage change in the price of the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts are referredover the same period. USCF believes that market arbitrage opportunities will cause daily changes in CPER’s share price on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis, to collectively as “Other Copper-Related Investments,”closely track the daily changes in CPER’s per share NAV on a percentage basis. USCF believes that the net effect of this expected relationship and together withthe expected relationship described above between CPER’s per share NAV and the SCI will be that the daily changes in the price of CPER’s shares on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis will closely track the daily changes in the SCI on a percentage basis, less CPER’s expenses. While CPER is composed of Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts and other Eligibleis therefore a measure of the prices of the corresponding commodities comprising the SCI for future delivery, there is nonetheless expected to be a reasonable degree of correlation between the SCI and the cash or spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, “Copper Interests.”Contracts.

Investors should be aware that CPER’s shares began trading on November 15, 2011. As of December 31, 2017, CPER held 153 Futures Contracts on the COMEX.

USAG’s Investment Objective

The investment objective is not for its NAV or market price of USAG is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share NAVshares to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the SummerHaven Dynamic Agriculture Index Total ReturnSM (the “SDAI”), less USAG’s expenses. USCF does not intend to operate USAG in a fashion such that its per share NAV will equal, in dollar terms, the spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component AgricultureCopper Futures Contracts (as defined below) that comprise the SDAI or the prices of any particular group of Futures Contracts. USAG

2

futures contracts. CPER will not seek to achieve its stated investment objective over a period of time greater than one day.  USCF believes thatThis is because natural market forces called contango and backwardation have impacted the total return on an investment in CPER’s shares during the past year relative to a hypothetical direct investment in various commodities and, in the future, it is not practical to managelikely that the portfolio to achieve such an investment goal when investingrelationship between the market price of CPER’s shares and changes in Futures Contracts and Other Agriculture-Related Investments (as defined below). The SDAI is designed to reflect the performance of a diversified group of agricultural commodities. The SDAI is owned and maintained by SHIM and calculated and published by the NYSE Arca. Futures contracts for the agricultural commodities comprising the SDAI are traded on ICE Future US, ICE Futures Canada, the CBOT, the Kansas City Board of Trade (“KCBT”) and the CME and are collectively referred to herein as “Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts.” The SDAI is comprised of 14 Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts that are selected on a monthly basis based on quantitative formulas developed by SHIM. The Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts that at any given time make up the SDAI are referred to herein as “Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts.” The relative weighting of the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts will change on a monthly basis, based on quantitative formulas relating to thespot prices of the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts developedunderlying commodities will continue to be so impacted by SHIM.

USAG seekscontango and backwardation. (It is important to achieve its investment objective by investing tonote that the fullest extent possible indisclosure above ignores the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts. Then, if constrained by regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, USAG will invest next in other Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts based onpotential costs associated with physically owning and storing the same agricultural commodity as the futures contracts subject to such regulatory constraints or market conditions, and finally, to a lesser extent, in other exchange traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts if one or more other Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts is not available. When USAG has invested to the fullest extent possible in exchange-traded futures contracts, USAG may then invest in other contracts and instruments based on the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts, other Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts or the agricultural commodities, included in the SDAI, such as cash-settled options, forward contracts, cleared swap contracts and swap contracts other than cleared swap contracts. Other exchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts and other contracts and instruments based on the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts, as well as metals included in the SDAI, are collectively referred to as “Other Agriculture-Related Investments,” and together with Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts and other Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts, “Agriculture Interests.”

USAG’s shares began trading on April 13, 2012.which could be substantial.) As of December 31, 2017, USAG2023, CPER held 341,342 Futures Contracts on the ICE Futures, 24 Futures Contracts on the CBOT, 10 Futures Contracts on the CME and 2 Futures Contract on the KCBT.

COMEX.

Other Defined Terms – Trust Series

The SDCI the SCI and the SDAISCI are referred to throughout this annual report on Form 10-K collectively as the “Applicable Index” or “Indices.”

Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts and Benchmark Component AgricultureCopper Futures Contracts are referred to throughout this annual report on Form 10-K collectively as “Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.”

Other Commodity-Related Investments and Other Copper-Related Investments and Other Agriculture-Related Interests are referred to throughout this annual report on Form 10-K collectively as “Other Related Investments.” Commodity Interests Copper Interests and AgricultureCopper Interests are collectively referred to herein as “Applicable Interests” throughout this annual report on Form 10-K.

Who is USCF?

USCF is a single member limited liability company that was formed in the state of Delaware on May 10, 2005. USCF maintains its main business office at 1999 Harrison Street,1850 Mt. Diablo Boulevard, Suite 1530, Oakland, CA 94612.640, Walnut Creek, California 94596. USCF is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wainwright Holdings, Inc.,USCF Investments, a Delaware corporation, (“Wainwright”) which is an intermediate holding company that owns USCF and another advisor of exchange traded funds. USCF Investments is a wholly owned subsidiary of Concierge Technologies, Inc.Marygold (publicly traded under the ticker CNCG) (“Concierge”).MGLD), a publicly traded holding company that owns various financial and non-financial businesses. Mr. Nicholas Gerber (discussed below), along with certain other family members and certain other shareholders, owns the majority of the shares of Concierge. Wainwrightin Marygold. USCF Investments is a holding company that currently holds both USCF, as well as USCF Advisers LLC, an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.amended, (“USCF Advisers”). USCF Advisers LLC serves as the investment adviser for the USCF SummerHaven SHPEN IndexDynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (“BUYN”SDCI”), the USCF SummerHaven SHPEI IndexMidstream Energy Income Fund (“BUY”UMI”), the USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund (“GLDX”); the USCF Dividend Income Fund (“UDI”), the USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (“ZSB”), USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (“USE”), USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (“ZSC”), and USCF Aluminum Strategy Fund (“ALUM”), each of which is a series of the USCF ETF Trust, as well as the USCF Commodity Strategy Fund, a series of the USCF Mutual Funds Trust. USCF ETF Trust and USCF Mutual Funds Trust are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). USCF Advisers LLCIt was also the investment adviser for the Stock Split Index Fund (“TOFR”) and the USCF Restaurant Leaders Fund (“MENU”), each atwo series of the USCF ETF Trust until October 2017 when both fundsthat liquidated all of their assets and distributed cash pro rata to all remaining shareholders.shareholders: the USCF SummerHaven SHPEI Index Fund (“BUY”), until October 2020, and the USCF SummerHaven SHPEN Index Fund (“BUYN”), until May 2020. The USCF ETF Trust is registered under the 1940 Act. The Board of Trustees for the USCF ETF Trust and USCF Mutual Funds Trust consistconsists of different independent trustees than those independent directors who serve on the Board of Directors of USCF. USCF is a member of the National Futures Association (the “NFA”)NFA and registered as a commodity pool operator (“CPO”)CPO with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”)CFTC on December 1, 2005 and as a swaps firm on August 8, 2013.

USCF is the sponsor of the Trust and each of its series: USCI and CPER. USCF also serves as the general partner of the United States Oil Fund, LP (“USO”), the United States Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNG”), the United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (“USL”), the United States GasolineBrent Oil Fund, LP (“UGA”BNO”), the United States Diesel-Heating OilGasoline Fund, LP (“UHN”), the United States Short Oil Fund, LP (“DNO”UGA”), the United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNL”) and the United States Brent Oil Fund, LP (“BNO”USO”).

USO, UNG, USL, UGA, UHN, DNO, UNL, USL and BNO are actively operating funds and all are listed on the NYSE Arca.

In addition, USCF is the sponsor of the USCF Funds Trust, a Delaware Statutory Trust, and each of its series, the REX S&P MLP Fund (“RMLP”), and the REX S&P MLP Inverse Fund (“MLPD”), which are currently in registration and have not commenced operations (together, the “REX Funds”), and the United States 3x Oil Fund (“USOU”) and the United States 3x Short Oil Fund (“USOD”), which commenced operations on July 20, 2017.

All funds listed previously, other than UCCO and the REX Funds, are referred to collectively herein as the “Related Public Funds.”

TheUSCI, CPER and the Related Public Funds are subject to reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). For more information about USCI, CPER and each of the Related Public Funds, investors in the Trust Series may call 1.800.920.0259 or visit www.uscfinvestments.com or the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) website at www.sec.gov.

USCF is required to evaluate the credit risk of each Trust Series to the futures commission merchant (“FCM”), oversee the purchase and sale of eachthe Trust Series’ shares by certain authorized purchasers (“Authorized Participants”), review daily positions and margin requirements of eachthe Trust Series and manage eachthe Trust Series’ investments. USCF also pays the fees of ALPS Distributors, Inc., which serves as the marketing agent for eachthe Trust Series (the “Marketing Agent” or “ALPS Distributors”), Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.and The Bank of New York Mellon (“BBH&Co.”BNY Mellon”), which

3

serves as the administrator (the “Administrator”) and the custodian (the “Custodian”) for eachthe Trust Series and SummerHaven Investment Management, LLC (“SummerHaven”), which serves as the commodity trading advisorprovides accounting and transfer agent services for, USCI, CPER and USAG.

There are no executive officers or employees of the Trust or any series thereof. Pursuant to the Trust Agreement, the affairs of the Trust and each series thereof are managed by USCF.

Series since April 1, 2020.

The business and affairs of USCF are managed by a board of directors (the “Board”), which is comprised of four management directors (the “Management Directors”), each of whom are also executive officers or employees of USCF, and three independent directors who meet the independent director requirements established by the NYSE Arca Equities Rules and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Management Directors have the authority to manage USCF pursuant to the terms of the Sixth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of USCF, dated as of July 22, 2011 (as amended from time to time, the “LLC Agreement”). Through its Management Directors, USCF manages the day-to-day operations of each Trust Series. The Board has an audit committee which is made up of the three independent directors (Gordon L. Ellis, Malcolm R. Fobes III and Peter M. Robinson). For additional information relating to the audit committee, please see“Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance – Audit Committee” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

There are no executive officers or employees of the Trust or any series thereof. Pursuant to the Trust Agreement, the affairs of the Trust and each series thereof are managed by USCF.

How Does Each Trust Series Operate?

An investment in the shares provides a means for diversifying an investor’s portfolio or hedging exposure to changes in commodities prices. An investment in the shares allows both retail and institutional investors to easily gain this exposure to the commodities market in a transparent, cost-effective manner.

The investment objective of each Trust Series is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its per share NAV to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the Applicable Index, less each Trust Series expenses. USCF does not intend to operate any Trust Series in a fashion such that its per share NAV will equal, in dollar terms, the price of the Applicable Index or the price of any particular Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract. USCF believes that it is not practical to manage each Trust Series’ portfolio to achieve such an investment goal when investing in the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and Other Related Investments.

How USCI Seeks to Achieve Its Investment Objective.USCI seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in a mix of Commodity Interests such that the daily changes in its’ per share NAV will closely track the daily changesprimarily in the SDCI. USCI’s positionsBenchmark Component Futures Contracts. Then, if constrained by regulatory requirements, risk mitigation measures, liquidity requirements, or in Commodity Interestsview of market conditions, USCI will invest next in other Futures Contracts based on the same commodity as the futures contracts subject to such regulatory constraints or market conditions, and finally, to a lesser extent, in other exchange-traded futures contracts that are rebalanced on a monthly basis in ordereconomically identical or substantially similar to track the changing nature of the SDCI. The portfolio rebalancing takes place during the last four business days of the month (“Rebalancing Period”). At the end of each of the days in the Rebalancing Period, one fourth of the prior month portfolio positions are replaced by equally-weighted positions reflecting the particular Benchmark Component Futures Contracts determinedif one or more other Futures Contracts is not available. When USCI has invested to the fullest extent possible in exchange-traded futures contracts, USCI may then invest in other contracts and instruments based on the Selection Date, which is the fifth business day before the end of the month (“USCI’s Selection Date”). At the end of the Rebalancing Period, the SDCI will have an equal-weight position of approximately 7.14% in each of the selected Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, which will be reflectedother Futures Contracts or the commodities included in the rebalanced portfolio. After fulfillingSDCI, such as cash-settled options, forward contracts, cleared swap contracts and swap contracts other than cleared swap contracts. Other exchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the collateral requirementsBenchmark Component Futures Contracts and other contracts and instruments based on the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts are collectively referred to as “Other Commodity-Related Investments,” and together with respectBenchmark Component Futures Contracts and other Futures Contracts, “Commodity Interests.”

Market conditions that USCF currently anticipates could cause USCI to its Commodity Interests,invest in Other Commodity-Related Investments include those allowing USCI to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing. USCI invests substantially the remainderentire amount of its proceeds fromassets in Futures Contracts while supporting such investments by holding the saleamounts of creation basketsits margin, collateral and other requirements relating to these obligations in short-term obligations of the United States of two years or less (“Treasuries”) or, cash equivalents, and/or merely holds such assets inand cash (generally in interest-bearing accounts).

equivalents. The daily holdings of USCI are available on USCI’s website at www.uscfinvestments.com.

How CPER Seeks to Achieve Its Investment Objective. CPER seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing to the fullest extent possibleprimarily in the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts. Then, if constrained by regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, CPER willmay also, to a lesser extent, invest next in other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts and finally to a lesser extent, inbeyond the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts or other exchange tradedexchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, if oneas well as other investments based on copper, such as cash-settled options on Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, forward contracts for copper, cleared swap contracts, non-cleared “over-the-counter” or more“OTC” transactions that are based on the price of copper and other Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts and indices based on the foregoing (collectively, “Other Copper-Related Investments”). The following factors, among others, may be considered when determining CPER’s investments in Eligible Copper Futures Contracts or in Other Copper-Related Investments: regulatory requirements, risk mitigation measures taken by CPER, CPER’s FCMs, counterparties or other market participants, liquidity and market conditions. Other factors that may impact CPER’s investments in other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts, is not available. When CPER has invested to the fullest extent possible inother exchange-traded futures contracts, it may then invest inor Other Copper-Related Investments. After fulfilling the collateral requirementsInvestments include allowing CPER to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with respectmore favorable pricing. In addition, CPER may need to its Copper Interests, CPER invests the remainderhold significant portions of its proceeds from the sale of creation baskets in Treasuries or cash equivalents, and/or merely holds such assetsportfolio in cash (generallybeyond what it has historically held for reasons including (but not limited to) the need to address the changes in interest-bearing accounts).

How USAG Seeks to Achieve Its Investment Objective. USAG seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing to the fullest extent possible in the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts. Then, if constrained bymarket conditions, regulatory requirements or in viewrisk mitigation measures or the need to satisfy potential margin requirements. For convenience and unless

4

otherwise specified, Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, other Eligible AgricultureCopper Futures Contracts and finallyOther Copper-Related Investments collectively are referred to a lesser extent,as “Copper Interests.”

CPER currently invests substantially the entire amount of its assets in other exchange traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component AgricultureEligible Copper Futures Contracts if one or more other Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts is not available. When USAG has invested towhile supporting such investments by holding the fullest extent possible in exchange-traded futures contracts, it may then invest in Other Agriculture-Related Investments. After fulfilling the collateral requirements with respect to its Agriculture Interests, USAG will invest the remainderamounts of its proceeds from the sale of creation basketsmargin, collateral and other requirements relating to these obligations in Treasuries, or cash equivalents, and/or merely hold such assets inand cash (generally in interest-bearing accounts).

equivalents. The anticipated datesdaily holdings of CPER are available on which USCI, USAG and CPER’s positions in Applicable Interests will be rebalanced on a monthly basis are posted on such Trust Series’ website www.uscfinvestments.com, and are subject to change without notice.

at www.uscfinvestments.com.

USCF employs a “neutral” investment strategy in order to track changes in the Applicable Index regardless of whether the Applicable Index goes up or goes down. A Trust Series’ “neutral” investment strategy is designed to permit investors generally to purchase and sell a Trust Series’ shares for the purpose of investing indirectly in the applicable commodities market in a cost-effective manner, and/or to permit participants in the applicable commodities or other industries to hedge the risk of losses in their applicable commodity-related transactions. Accordingly, depending on the investment objective of an individual investor, the risks generally associated with investing in the commodities market and/or the risks involved in hedging may exist. In addition, an investment in a Trust Series involves the risks that the daily changes in the price of the Trust Series’ shares, in percentage terms, will not accurately track the daily changes in the Applicable Index, in percentage terms, and that daily changes in the Applicable Index, in percentage terms, will not closely correlate with daily changes in the spot prices of the applicable commodities underlying the Applicable Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, in percentage terms.

Each Trust Series’ investment objective is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its per share NAV to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the Applicable Index,not to have the market price of its shares match, in dollar terms, changes in the price of the Applicable Index or the applicable commodities underlying the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts that make up the Applicable Index. Contango and backwardation may impact the total return on investment in shares of a Trust Series relative to a hypothetical direct investment in the commodities underlying the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts that make up the Applicable Index and, in the future, it is likely that the relationship between the market prices of a Trust Series’ shares and changes in the spot prices of the commodities underlying the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts that make up the Applicable Index could be impacted by contango and backwardation. It is important to note that this comparison ignores the potential costs associated with physically owning and storing commodities, which could be substantial. For a more in-depth discussion of the impact of contango and backwardation, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Furthermore, each Trust Series also purchases Treasuries and holds cash and/or cash equivalents to meet its current or potential margin or collateral requirements with respect to its investments in Applicable Interests and to hold cash not required to be used as margin or collateral. There is not expected to be any meaningful correlation between the performance of a Trust Series’ investments in Treasuries, cash or cash equivalents and the changes in the prices of commodities or Applicable Interests. While the level of interest earned on or the market price of these investments may in some respect correlate to changes in the prices of commodities, this correlation is not anticipated as part of the Trust Series’ efforts to meet its objective.


A Trust Series’ total portfolio composition is disclosed on the applicable Trust Series’ website on each business day that the NYSE Arca is open for trading. For a list of each of USCI’s, CPER’s and USAG’s current holdings, please see www.uscfinvestments.com. The website disclosure of portfolio holdings for each Trust Series is made daily and includes, as applicable, the name and value of each Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract, the specific types and values of Other Related Investments and characteristics of such Other Related Investments, the name and value of each Treasury and cash equivalent, and the amount of cash held in each Trust Series, as applicable. Each Trust Series’ website is publicly accessible at no charge. Each Trust Series’ assets used for margin and collateral are held in segregated accounts pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”) and CFTC regulations.

The shares issued by a Trust Series may only be purchased by Authorized Participants and only in blocks of 50,000 shares called “Creation Baskets” through the Marketing Agent. The amount of the purchase payment for a Creation Basket is equal to the aggregate NAV of the shares in the Creation Basket. Similarly, only Authorized Participants may redeem shares and only in blocks of 50,000 shares called “Redemption Baskets”. The amount of the redemption proceeds for a Redemption Basket is equal to the aggregate NAV of shares in the Redemption Basket. The purchase price for Creation Baskets and the redemption price for Redemption Baskets are the actual per share NAV calculated at the end of the business day when a request for a purchase or redemption is received by the applicable Trust Series. The NYSE Arca publishes an approximate per share NAV intra-day based on the prior day’s per share NAV and the current price of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, but the price of Creation Baskets and Redemption Baskets is determined based on the actual per share NAV calculated at the end of each trading day.

While each Trust Series only issues shares in Creation Baskets, shares are listed on the NYSE Arca and investors may purchase and sell shares at market prices like any security.

What is the Investment Strategy for each Trust Series?

In managing a Trust Series’ assets, USCF does not use a technical trading system that automatically issues buy and sell orders, other than to address monthly changes in the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, on a percentage basis. Instead, each time one or more baskets are purchased or redeemed, USCF will purchase or sell Applicable Interests with an aggregate market value that approximates the amount of Treasuries and/or cash received or paid upon the purchase or redemption of the basket(s).

Each Trust Series endeavors to place trades in Applicable Interests and otherwise manage its investments so that “A” will be within plus/minus ten percent (10%) of “B”, where:

A is the average daily percentage change in such Trust Series’ per share NAV for any period of 30 successive valuation days;i.e. i.e., any NYSE Arca trading day as of which the Trust Series calculates its per share NAV; and

B is the average daily percentage change in the price of the Applicable Index over the same period.
B is the average daily percentage change in the price of the Applicable Index over the same period.

USCF believes that market arbitrage opportunities will cause the daily changes in each Trust Series’ share price on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis to closely track the daily changes in such Trust Series’ per share NAV on a percentage basis. USCF further believes that the net effect of this expected relationship and the expected relationship described above between a Trust Series’ per share NAV and the Applicable Index will be that the daily changes in the price of a Trust Series’ shares on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis will closely track the daily changes in the Applicable Index on a percentage basis, less such Trust Series’ expenses. While the Applicable Index is composed of Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and is therefore a measure of the prices of the applicable commodities comprising the Applicable Index for future delivery, there is nonetheless expected to be a reasonable degree of correlation between the Applicable Index and the cash or spot prices of the commodities underlying the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.

5

Commodity Interests. The specific Commodity Interests purchased depend on various factors, including a judgment by USCF as to the appropriate diversification of USCI’s investments. While USCF has made significant investments in Benchmark Component Futures Contracts on the Futures Exchanges, for various reasons, including the ability to enter into the precise amount of exposure to the commodities market and position limits on Futures Contracts, it may also invest in economically equivalent Futures Contracts other than those that compose the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and Other Commodity-Related Investments. To the extent that USCI invests in Other Related Investments, it would prioritize investments in contracts and instruments that are economically equivalent to the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, including cleared swaps that satisfy such criteria, and then to a lesser extent, it would invest in other types of cleared swaps and other contracts, instruments and non-cleared swaps, such as swaps in over-the-counter market (or commonly referred to as the OTC market.“market”). If USCI is required by law or regulation, or by one of its regulators, including a Futures Exchange, to reduce its position in one or more Benchmark Component Futures Contracts to the applicable position limit or to a specified accountability level, a substantial portion of USCI’s assets could be invested in Other Commodity-Related Investments that are intended to replicate the return on the SDCI or particular Benchmark Component Futures Contracts. As USCI’s assets reach higher levels, USCI is more likely to exceed position limits, accountability levels or other regulatory limits and, as a result, it is more likely that it will invest in Other Commodity-Related Investments at such higher levels. In addition, market conditions that USCF currently anticipates could cause USCI to invest in Other Commodity-Related Investments include those allowing USCI to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing. See“Item 1. Business – Commodities Regulation” in this annual report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the potential impact of regulation on USCI’s ability to invest in OTC transactions and cleared swaps.


Copper Interests. The specific Copper Interests purchased will depend on various factors, including a judgment by USCF as to the appropriate diversification of CPER’s investments. USCF anticipates, particularly while CPER has lesser amounts of assets, that it will make significant investments in Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts on the COMEX. In addition, for various reasons, including the ability to enter into the precise amount of exposure to the copper market or due to market conditions regarding liquidity or pricing of differing futures contracts, it may invest in other exchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to, the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts. USCF further anticipates that as CPER grows larger, due to position limits on futures contracts or other regulatory requirements limiting CPER’s holdings, and market conditions, it may also invest in Other Copper-Related Investments. To the extent that CPER invests in Other Copper-Related Investments, it would prioritize investments in contracts and instruments that are economically equivalent to the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts. In considering the use of Other Copper-Related Investments, USCF anticipates that it would first make use of swaps that clear through derivatives clearing organizations that satisfy CPER’s criteria if such swaps are available with respect to the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts or the copper futures contracts included in the SCI. Then, and to a lesser extent, it would invest in other types of contracts, instruments and swaps, including uncleared swaps in the OTC market. If CPER is required by law or regulation, or by one of its regulators, including the COMEX, to reduce its position in one or more Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts to the applicable position limit or to a specified accountability level or if market conditions dictate it would be more appropriate to invest in Other Copper-Related Investments, a substantial portion of CPER’s assets could be invested in accordance with such priority in Other Copper-Related Investments that are intended to replicate the return on the SCI or particular Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts. As CPER’s assets reach higher levels, CPER is more likely to exceed position limits, accountability levels or other regulatory limits and, as a result, it is more likely that it will invest in accordance with such priority in Other Copper-Related Investments at such higher levels. In addition, market conditions that USCF currently anticipates could cause CPER to invest in Other Copper-Related Investments include those allowing CPER to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing. See“Item 1. Business – Commodities Regulation” in this annual report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the potential impact of regulation on CPER’s ability to invest in OTC transactions and cleared swaps.

Agriculture Interests.The specific Agriculture Interests purchased will depend on various factors, including a judgment by USCF as to the appropriate diversification of USAG’s investments. USCF anticipates, particularly while USAG has lesser amounts of assets, that it will make significant investments in Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts on ICE Futures US, ICE Futures Canada, CBOT, KCBT and the CME. In addition, for various reasons, including the ability to enter into the precise amount of exposure to the agricultural commodities market or due to market conditions regarding liquidity or pricing of differing futures contracts, it may invest in other exchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to, the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts. USCF further anticipates that as USAG grows larger, due to position limits on futures contracts or other regulatory requirements limiting USAG’s holdings, and market conditions, it may also invest in Other Agriculture-Related Investments. To the extent that USAG invests in Other Agriculture-Related Investments, it would prioritize investments in contracts and instruments that are economically equivalent to the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts. In considering the use of Other Agriculture-Related Investments, USCF anticipates that it would first make use of swaps that clear through derivatives clearing organizations that satisfy USAG’s criteria if such swaps are available with respect to the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts or the agricultural commodity futures contracts included in the SDAI. Then, and to a lesser extent, it would invest in other types of contracts, instruments and swaps, including uncleared swaps in the OTC market. If USAG is required by law or regulation, or by one of its regulators, including ICE Futures US, ICE Futures Canada, CBOT, KCBT or the CME, to reduce its position in one or more Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts to the applicable position limit or to a specified accountability level or if market conditions dictate it would be more appropriate to invest in Other Agriculture-Related Investments, a substantial portion of the USAG’s assets could be invested in accordance with such priority in Other Agriculture-Related Investments that are intended to replicate the return on the SDAI or particular Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts. As the USAG’s assets reach higher levels, USAG is more likely to exceed position limits, accountability levels or other regulatory limits and, as a result, it is more likely that it will invest in accordance with such priority in Other Agriculture-Related Investments at such higher levels. In addition, market conditions that USCF currently anticipates could cause USAG to invest in Other Agriculture-Related Investments include those allowing USAG to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing. See“Item 1. Business - Commodities Regulation” in this annual report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the potential impact of regulation on USAG’s ability to invest in OTC transactions and cleared swaps.

USCF may not be able to fully invest a Trust Series’ assets in Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts having an aggregate notional amount exactly equal to that Trust Series’ NAV. For example, as standardized contracts, the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts included in an Applicable Index are for a specified amount of a particular commodity, and the applicable Trust Series’ NAV and the proceeds from the sale of a Creation Basket in a particular Trust Series is unlikely to be an exact multiple of the amounts of those contracts. As a result, in such circumstances, a Trust Series may be better able to achieve the exact amount of exposure to changes in price of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts through the use of Other Related Investments, such as OTC contracts that have better correlation with changes in price of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.

Each Trust Series anticipates that, to the extent it invests in Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts other than the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and Other Related Investments that are not economically equivalent to the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, it will enter into various non-exchange-traded derivative contracts to hedge the short-term price movements of such Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and Other Related Investments against the current Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.

6

USCF does not anticipate letting its Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts expire and taking delivery of any commodities. Instead, USCF closes existing positions,e.g., in response to ongoing changes in the Applicable Index or if it otherwise determines it would be appropriate to do so and reinvests the proceeds in new Applicable Interests. Positions may also be closed out to meet orders for Redemption Baskets, in which case the proceeds from closing the positions will not be reinvested.


The Trust Agreement contains no restrictions on the ability of USCF to change the investment objective of any Trust Series. Notwithstanding this, USCF has no intention of changing the investment objective of any Trust Series or the manner in which it intends to achieve its investment objective. Should USCF seek to change the investment objective of a Trust Series, such change would be reflected in an amended prospectus and would provide advance notice to investors.

What are Futures Contracts?

Futures contracts are agreements between two parties. One party agrees to buy a commodity such as natural gas or copper from the other party at a later date at a price and quantity agreed-upon when the contract is made. Generally, futures contracts traded on the NYMEX and the COMEX are priced by floor brokers and other exchange members both through an “open outcry” of offers to purchase or sell the contracts and through an electronic, screen-based system that determines the price by matching electronically offers to purchase and sell. Futures contracts may also be based on commodity indices, in that they call for a cash payment based on the change in the value of the specified index during a specified period. Additional risks of investing in futures contracts are included in“Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Accountability Levels, Position Limits and Price Fluctuation LimitsLimits. . Designated contract markets (“DCMs”), such as the NYMEX and ICE Futures, have established accountability levels and position limits on the maximum net long or net short futures contracts in commodity interests that any person or group of persons under common trading control (other than as a hedge, which is not applicable to the Trust Series’ investments) may hold, own or control. These levels and position limits apply to the futures contracts that the Trust invests in to meet its investment objective. In addition to accountability levels and position limits, the NYMEX and ICE Futures may also set daily price fluctuation limits on futures contracts. The daily price fluctuation limit establishes the maximum amount that the price of a futures contract may vary either up or down from the previous day’s settlement price. Once the daily price fluctuation limit has been reached in a particular futures contract, no trades may be made at a price beyond that limit.

The accountability levels for the commodities comprising an Applicable Index and other futures contracts traded on U.S.-based futures exchanges are not a fixed ceiling, but rather a threshold above which such exchanges may exercise greater scrutiny and control over an investor’s positions. As of December 31, 2017,2023, USCI held 1,794813 Futures Contracts on the NYMEX, 3,297held 1,308 Futures Contracts on the ICE Futures, 1,573held 918 Futures Contracts on the CBOT, 1,225held 182 Futures Contracts on the CME, 6,796held 1,360 Futures Contracts on the LME and 701held 185 Futures Contracts on the COMEX. As of December 31, 2023, CPER held 1531,342 Futures Contracts on the COMEX. USAG held 34 Futures Contracts on the ICE Futures, 24 Futures Contracts on the CBOT, 10 Futures Contracts on the CME and 2 Futures Contract on the KCBT. No Trust Series exceeded accountability levels imposed by the NYMEX, COMEX, CME, CBOT, KCBTLME or ICE Futures.

Position limits differ from accountability levels in that they represent fixed limits on the maximum number of futures contracts that any person may hold and cannot allow such limits to be exceeded without express CFTC authority to do so. In addition to accountability levels and position limits that may apply at any time, the Futures Exchanges may impose position limits on contracts held in the last few days of trading in the near month contract to expire. It is unlikely that a Trust Series will run up against such position limits. A Trust Series does not typically hold the near month contract in its Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts. In addition, each Trust Series’ investment strategy is to close out its positions during each Rebalancing Period in advance of the period right before expiration and purchase new contracts. As such, none of the Trust Series anticipates that position limits that apply to the last few days prior to a contract’s expiration will impact it. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, no Trust Series exceeded position limits imposed by the NYMEX, COMEX, CME, CBOT, KCBTLME or ICE Futures.

The CFTC has proposed to adoptPart 150 of the CFTC’s regulations (“Position Limits Rule”) establishes federal position limits on speculative positions infor 25 physical commoditycore referenced futures contracts (comprised of agricultural, energy and metals futures contracts), futures and optionoptions linked to the core referenced futures contracts, as well asand swaps that are economically equivalent to suchthe core referenced futures contracts in the agriculture, energy and metals markets (the “Position Limit Rules”). The Position Limit Rules would, among other things: identify which contractsthat all market participants must comply with, with certain exemptions.

Certain Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts are subject to speculative position limits; set thresholds that restrictlimits under the size of speculative positions that a person may holdPosition Limits Rule, and the Trust Series’ trading does not qualify for an exemption therefrom. Accordingly, the Position Limits Rule could inhibit the Trust Series’ ability to invest in the spot month, other individual months,Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and all months combined; create an exemption for positions that constitute bona fide hedging transactions; impose responsibilities on designated contract markets (“DCMs”) and swap execution facilities (“SEFs”) to establish position limits or, in some cases, position accountability rules; and apply to both futures and swaps across four relevant venues: OTC, DCMs, SEFs as well as certain non-U.S. located platforms. The CFTC’s first attempt at finalizing the Position Limit Rules, in 2011, was successfully challenged by market participants in 2012 and, since then, the CFTC has re-proposed them and solicited comments from market participants multiple times. At this time, it is unclear how the Position Limit Rules may affect the Trust Series, but the effect may be substantial and adverse. By way of example, the Position Limit Rules maythereby could negatively impact the ability of athe Trust Series to meet its investment objectives through limits that may inhibit USCF’s ability to sell additional Creation Baskets of a Trust Series. See “The Commodity Interest Markets – Commodities Regulation” in this annual report on Form 10-K for additional information.objective.

Until such time as the Position Limit Rules are adopted, the regulatory architecture in effect prior to the adoption of the Position Limit Rules will govern transactions in commodities and related derivatives. Under that system, the CFTC enforces federal limits on speculation in nine agricultural products (e.g., corn, wheat and soy), while futures exchanges establish and enforce position limits and accountability levels for other agricultural products and certain energy products (e.g., oil and natural gas). As a result, a Trust Series may be limited with respect to the size of its investments in any commodities subject to these limits.

Under existing and recently adopted CFTC regulations, for the purpose of position limits, a market participant is generally required, subject to certain narrow exceptions, to aggregate all positions for which that participant controls the trading decisions with all positions for which that participant has a 10 percent or greater ownership interest in an account or position, as well as the positions of two or more persons acting pursuant to an express or implied agreement or understanding with that participant (the “Aggregation Rules”). The Aggregation Rules will also apply with respect to the Position Limit Rules if and when such Position Limit Rules are adopted.


Price VolatilityVolatility.. The price volatility of futures contracts generally has been historically greater than that for traditional securities such as stocks and bonds. Price volatility often is greater day-to-day as opposed to intra-day. Because each Trust Series invests a significant portion of its assets in futures contracts, the assets of each Trust Series, and therefore the price of each Trust Series’ shares, may be subject to greater volatility than traditional securities.

7

Marking-to-Market Futures PositionsPositions.. Futures contracts are marked to market at the end of each trading day and the margin required with respect to such contracts is adjusted accordingly. This process of marking-to-market is designed to prevent losses from accumulating in any futures account. Therefore, if a Trust Series’ futures positions have declined in value, such Trust Series may be required to post variation margin to cover this decline. Alternatively, if a Trust Series’ futures positions have increased in value, this increase will be credited to such Trust Series’ account.

What is the SDCI?

The SDCI was developed based upon academic research by Yale University professors Gary B. Gortonis a commodity sector index designed to broadly represent major commodities while overweighting the components that are assessed to be in a low inventory state and K. Geert Rouwenhorst, and Hitotsubashi University professor Fumio Hayashi.underweighting the components assessed to be in a high inventory state. The SDCI is designed to reflect the performance of a fully margined or collateralized portfolio of 14 eligible commodity futures contracts with equal weights, selected each month from a universe of 27 eligible commodity futures contracts. The SDCI is rules-based and rebalanced monthly based on observable price signals. In this context, the term “rules-based” is meant to indicate that the composition of the SDCI in any given month will be determined by quantitative formulas relating to the prices of the futures contracts that relate to the commodities that are eligible to be included in the SDCI. Such formulas are not subject to adjustment based on other factors. The overall return on the SDCI is generated by two components: (i) uncollateralized returns from the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts comprising the SDCI and (ii) a daily fixed income return reflecting the interest earned on a hypothetical 3-month U.S. Treasury Bill collateral portfolio, calculated using the weekly auction rate for the 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bills published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. SHIM is the owner of the SDCI.

TheCurrently, the SDCI is composed of physical non-financial commodity futures contracts with active and liquid markets traded upon futures exchanges in major industrialized countries. The futures contracts are denominated in U.S. dollars and weighted equally by notional amount. The SDCI currently reflects commodities in sixfive commodity sectors: energy (e.g.petroleum (e.g., crude oil, natural gas, heating oil, etc.), precious metals (e.g.(e.g., gold, silver platinum), industrial metals (e.g.(e.g., zinc, nickel, aluminum, copper, etc.), grains (e.g.(e.g., wheat, corn, soybeans, etc.), softs (e.g.and non-primary sector (e.g., sugar, cotton, coffee, cocoa), and livestock (e.g.,cocoa, natural gas, live cattle, lean hogs, feeder cattle).

8

Table 1 below lists the eligible commodities, the relevant futures exchange on which the futures contract is listed and quotation details. Table 2 lists the eligible futures contracts, their sector designation and maximum allowable tenor.

TABLE 1

Commodity

    

Commodity

Designated Contract

Exchange

Units

Quote

Aluminum

High Grade Primary Aluminum

LME

25 metric tons

USD/metric ton

Cocoa

Cocoa

ICE-US

10 metric tons

USD/metric ton

Coffee

Coffee “C”

ICE-US

37,500 lbs

U.S. cents/pound

Copper

Copper

COMEX

25,000 lbs

U.S. cents/pound

Corn

Corn

CBOT

5,000 bushels

U.S. cents/bushel

Cotton

Cotton

ICE-US

50,000 lbs

U.S. cents/pound

Crude Oil (WTI)

Light, Sweet Crude Oil

NYMEX

1,000 barrels

USD/barrel

Crude Oil (Brent)

Crude Oil

ICE-UK

1,000 barrels

USD/barrel

Gas Oil

Gas Oil

ICE-UK

100 metric tons

USD/metric ton

Gold

Gold

COMEX

100 troy oz.

USD/troy oz.

Heating Oil

Heating Oil

NYMEX

42,000 gallons

U.S. cents/gallon

Lead

Lead

LME

25 metric tons

USD/metric ton

Lean Hogs

Lean Hogs

CME

40,000 lbs.

U.S. cents/pound

Live Cattle

Live Cattle

CME

40,000 lbs.

U.S. cents/pound

Feeder Cattle

Feeder Cattle

CME

50,000 lbs.

U.S. cents/pound

Natural Gas

Henry Hub Natural Gas

NYMEX

10,000 mmbtu

USD/mmbtu

Nickel

Primary Nickel

LME

6 metric tons

USD/metric ton

Platinum

Platinum

NYMEX

50 troy oz.

USD/troy oz.

Silver

Silver

COMEX

5,000 troy oz.

U.S. cents/troy oz.

Soybeans

Soybeans

CBOT

5,000 bushels

U.S. cents/bushel

Soybean Meal

Soybean Meal

CBOT

100 tons

USD/ton

Soybean Oil

Soybean Oil

CBOT

60,000 lbs.

U.S. cents/pound

Sugar

World Sugar No. 11

ICE-US

112,000 lbs.

U.S. cents/pound

Tin

Tin

LME

5 metric tons

USD/metric ton

Unleaded Gasoline

Reformulated Blendstock for Oxygen Blending

NYMEX

42,000 gallons

U.S. cents/gallon

Wheat

Wheat

CBOT

5,000 bushels

U.S. cents/bushel

Zinc

Special High Grade Zinc

LME

25 metric tons

USD/metric ton


9

TABLE 2

Commodity

Symbol

Commodity


Name

Sector

Allowed Contracts

Max.

tenor

CO

Brent Crude

Energy

Petroleum

All 12 Calendar Months

12

9

CL

Crude Oil

Energy

Petroleum

All 12 Calendar Months

12

9

QS

Gas Oil

Energy

Petroleum

All 12 Calendar Months

12

4

HO

Heating Oil

Energy

Petroleum

All 12 Calendar Months

12

4

NG

XB

Natural Gas

RBOB

Energy

Petroleum

All 12 Calendar Months

12

4

XB

BO

RBOB

Soybean Oil

Energy

Grains

Jan, Mar, May, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Dec

1

C

Corn

Grains

Mar, May, Jul, Sep, Dec

4

S

Soybeans

Grains

Jan, Mar, May, Jul, Aug, Nov

4

SM

Soymeal

Grains

Jan, Mar, May, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Dec

3

W

Wheat (Soft Red Winter)

Grains

Mar, May, Jul, Sep, Dec

4

LA

Aluminum

Industrial Metals

All 12 Calendar months

4

HG

Copper

Industrial Metals

Mar, May, Jul, Sep, Dec

1

LL

Lead

Industrial Metals

All 12 Calendar Months

12

4

FC

LN

Nickel

Industrial Metals

All 12 Calendar Months

4

LT

Tin

Industrial Metals

All 12 Calendar Months

1

LX

Zinc

Industrial Metals

All 12 Calendar Months

4

GC

Gold

Precious Metals

Feb, Apr, Jun, Aug, Oct, Dec

1

PL

Platinum

Precious Metals

Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct

1

SI

Silver

Precious Metals

Mar, May, Jul, Sep, Dec

1

NG

Natural Gas

Non-Primary Sector

All 12 Calendar Months

6

FC

Feeder Cattle

Livestock

Non-Primary Sector

Jan, Mar, Apr, May, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov

5

1

LH

Lean Hogs

Livestock

Non-Primary Sector

Feb, Apr, Jun, Jul, Aug, Oct, Dec

5

1

LC

Live Cattle

Livestock

Non-Primary Sector

Feb, Apr, Jun, Aug, Oct, Dec

5

3

BO

CC

Soybean Oil

Cocoa

Grains

Non-Primary Sector

Jan, Mar, May, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Dec7
CCornGrains

Mar, May, Jul, Sep, Dec

12

1

S

KC

Soybeans

Coffee

Grains

Non-Primary Sector

Jan, Mar, May, Jul, Aug, Sep, Nov12
SMSoymealGrainsJan, Mar, May, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Dec7
WWheat (Soft Red Winter)Grains

Mar, May, Jul, Sep, Dec

7

1

LA

CT

Aluminum

Cotton

Industrial Metals

Non-Primary Sector

All 12 Calendar months12
HGCopperIndustrial MetalsAll 12 Calendar Months12
LLLeadIndustrial MetalsAll 12 Calendar Months7
LNNickelIndustrial MetalsAll 12 Calendar Months7
LTTinIndustrial MetalsAll 12 Calendar Months7
LXZincIndustrial MetalsAll 12 Calendar Months7
GCGoldPrecious MetalsFeb, Apr, Jun, Aug, Oct, Dec12
PLPlatinumPrecious MetalsJan, Apr, Jul, Oct5
SISilverPrecious MetalsMar, May, Jul, Sep, Dec5
CCCocoaSoftsMar, May, Jul, Sep, Dec7
KCCoffeeSoftsMar, May, Jul, Sep, Dec7
CTCottonSofts

Mar, May, Jul, Dec

7

1

SB

Sugar

Softs

Non-Primary Sector

Mar, May, Jul, Oct

7

3

Prior to the end of each month, SHIM determines the composition of the SDCI and provides such information to Bloomberg. Values of the SDCI are computed by Bloomberg and disseminated approximately every fifteen (15) seconds from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, which also publishes a daily SDCI value at approximately 5:30 p.m., New York City time, under the index ticker symbol “SDCITR:IND.” Only settlement and last-sale prices are used in the SDCI’s calculation, bids and offers are not recognized — including limit-bid and limit-offer price quotes. Where no last-sale price exists, typically in the more deferred contract months, the previous days’ settlement price is used. This means that the underlying SDCI may lag its theoretical value. This tendency to lag is evident at the end of the day when the SDCI value is based on the settlement prices of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, and explains why the underlying SDCI often closes at or near the high or low for the day.

Composition of the SDCI

The composition of the SDCI on any given day, as determined and published by SHIM, is determinative of the benchmark for USCI. However, it is not possible to anticipate all possible circumstances and events that may occur with respect to the SDCI and the methodology for its composition, weighting and calculation. Accordingly, a number of subjective judgments must be made in connection with the operation of the SDCI that cannot be adequately reflected in this description of the SDCI. All questions of interpretation with respect to the application of the provisions of the SDCI methodology, including any determinations that need to be made in the event of a market emergency or other extraordinary circumstances, will be resolved by SHIM.

The composition of the SDCI was revised beginning with the commodity selection process that commenced on December 24, 2020. SHIM revised the composition of the SDCI to consolidate the six commodity sectors that comprised the index into five sectors. Specifically, prior to December 24, 2020, the SDCI reflected commodities in six commodity sectors: energy (e.g., crude oil, natural gas, heating oil, etc.), precious metals (e.g., gold, silver platinum), industrial metals (e.g., zinc, nickel, aluminum, copper, etc.), grains (e.g., wheat, corn, soybeans, etc.), softs (e.g., sugar, cotton, coffee, cocoa), and livestock (e.g., live cattle, lean hogs, feeder cattle). During the year ended December 31, 2021, the composition of SDCI reflected the five commodity sectors: petroleum (e.g., crude oil, heating oil,

10

etc.), precious metals (e.g., gold, silver platinum), industrial metals (e.g., zinc, nickel, aluminum, copper, etc.), grains (e.g., wheat, corn, soybeans, etc.), and non-primary sector (e.g., sugar, cotton, coffee, cocoa, natural gas, live cattle, lean hogs, feeder cattle), discussed above and utilized the commodity selection as described below.

Contract Expirations

Because the SDCI is comprised of actively traded contracts with scheduled expirations, it can be calculated only by reference to the prices of contracts for specified expiration, delivery or settlement periods, referred to as contract expirations. The contract expirations included in the SDCI for each commodity during a given year are designated by SHIM, provided that each contract must be an active contract. An active contract for this purpose is a liquid, actively-traded contract expiration, as defined or identified by the relevant trading facility or, if no such definition or identification is provided by the relevant trading facility, as defined by standard custom and practice in the industry.


If a Futures Exchange ceases trading in all contract expirations relating to a particular Futures Contract, SHIM may designate a replacement contract on the commodity. The replacement contract must satisfy the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the SDCI. To the extent practicable, the replacement will be effected during the next monthly review of the composition of the SDCI. If that timing is not practicable, SHIM will determine the date of the replacement based on a number of factors, including the differences between the existing Futures Contract and the replacement Futures Contract with respect to contractual specifications and contract expirations.

If a contract is eliminated and there is no replacement contract, the underlying commodity will necessarily be dropped from the SDCI. The designation of a replacement contract, or the elimination of a commodity from the SDCI because of the absence of a replacement contract, could affect the value of the SDCI, either positively or negatively, depending on the price of the contract that is eliminated and the prices of the remaining contracts. It is impossible, however, to predict the effect of these changes, if they occur, on the value of the SDCI.

Commodity Selection

Fourteen of the 27 eligible Futures Contracts are selected for inclusion in the SDCI for the next month, subject to the constraint that each of the sixfour commodity sectors (excluding non-primary sector) is represented by at least one commodity. The methodology used to select the 14 Futures Contracts is based solely on quantitative data using observable futures prices and is not subject to human bias.

Monthly commodity selection is a two-step process based upon examination of the relevant futures prices for each commodity:

1)
1)The annualized percentage price difference between the closest-to-expiration Futures Contract and the next closest-to-expiration Futures Contract is calculated for each of the 27 eligible Futures Contracts on USCI’s Selection Date.
2)The 14 commodities with the highest percentage price difference are selected.

When evaluating the data from the first step, all four primary commodity sectors must be represented (Petroleum, Grains, Industrial Metals and Precious Metals). If the selection of the 27 eligible Futures Contracts on USCI’s Selection Date. The seven14 commodities with the highest percentage price difference are selected.

2) For the remaining 20 eligible commodities, the percentage price change of each commodity over the previous year is calculated, as measured by the change in the price of the closest-to-expiration Futures Contract on the Selection Date from the price of the closest-to-expiration Futures Contract a year prior to USCI’s Selection Date. The seven commodities with the highest percentage price change are selected.

When evaluating the data from the second step, all six commodity sectors must be represented. If the selection of the seven additional commodities with the highest price change fails to meet the overall diversification requirement that all sixfour primary commodity sectors are represented in the SDCI, the commodity with the highest percentage price changedifference among the commodities of the omitted primary sector(s) would be substituted for the commodity with the lowest percentage price changedifference among the seven additionalfourteen commodities.

The 14 commodities selected are included in the SDCI for the next month on an equally-weighted basis. Due to the dynamic monthly commodity selection, the sector weights will vary from approximately 7% to 43% over time, depending on the price observations each month. The Selection Date for the SDCI is the fifth business day prior to the end of that calendar month.

11

The following graph shows the sector weights of the commodities selected for inclusion in the SDCI as of December 31, 2017.2023.

USCI Sector WeightingsSDCI Commodity Weights as of December 31, 20172023

Graphic

11 

Source: Summerhaven Index

Management, Bloomberg

Contract Selection

For each commodity selected for inclusion into the SDCI for a particular month, the SDCI selects a specific Benchmark Component Futures Contract with a tenor (i.e.(i.e., contract month) among the eligible tenors (the range of contract months) based upon the relative prices of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts within the eligible range of contract months. The previous notwithstanding, the contract expiration is not changed for such month if a contract remains in the SDCI, as long as the contract does not expire or enter its notice period in the subsequent month.

Portfolio Construction

The portfolio rebalancing takes place during the Rebalancing Period. At the end of each of the days in the Rebalancing Period, one fourth of the prior month portfolio positions are replaced by an equally-weighted position in the commodity contracts determined on USCI’s Selection Date. At the end of the Rebalancing Period, the SDCI takes an equal-weight position of approximately 7.14% in each of the selected commodity contracts.

SDCI Total Return Calculation

The value of the SDCI on any business day is equal to the product of (i) the value of the SDCI on the immediately preceding business day multiplied by (ii) one plus the sum of the day’s returns for another version of the SDCI known as the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Excess Return (“SDCI ER”) (explained below) and one business day’s interest from hypothetical Treasuries. The value of the SDCI is calculated and published by Bloomberg.

12

SDCI Base Level

The SDCI was set to 100 on January 2, 1991.

SDCI ER Calculation

The total return of the SDCI ER reflects the percentage change of the market values of the underlying commodity futures. During the Rebalancing Period, the SDCI changes its contract holdings during a four day period. The value of the SDCI ER at the end of a business day “t” is equal to the SDCI ER value on day “t -1” multiplied by the sum of the daily percentage price changes of each commodity future factoring in each respective commodity future’s notional holding on day “t -1”.

Rebalancing Period

During the Rebalancing Period, existing positions are replaced by new positions based on the signals used for contract selection as outlined above. At the end of Selection Date, the signals are observed and on the first day following Selection Date a new portfolio is constructed that is equally weighted in terms of notional positions in the newly selected contracts.

What is the SCI?

The SCI is a single-commodity index designed to be an investment benchmark for copper as an asset class. The SCI is composed of copper futures contracts on the COMEX exchange. The SCI attempts to maximize backwardation and minimize contango while utilizing contracts in liquid portions of the futures curve.

The SCI is rules-based and is rebalanced monthly based on observable price signals described below in the section “Contract Selection and Weighting.” In this context, the term “rules-based” is meant to indicate that the composition of the SCI in any given month will be determined by quantitative formulas relating to the prices of the futures contracts that are included in the SCI. Such formulas are not subject to adjustment based on other factors.

The overall return on the SCI is generated by two components: (i) uncollateralized returns from the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts comprising the SCI, and (ii) a daily fixed income return reflecting the interest earned on hypothetical 3-month Treasuries, calculated using the weekly auction rate for 3-Month Treasuries published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. SHIM is the owner of the SCI.


Table 1 below lists the Futures Exchange on which the Eligible Copper Futures Contracts are listed and quotation details. Table 2 lists the Eligible Copper Futures Contracts, their sector designation and maximum allowable tenor.

TABLE 1

Commodity

    

Commodity

Designated Contract

Exchange

Units

Quote

Copper

Copper

COMEX

25,000 lbs

U.S. cents/pound

TABLE 2

Commodity Name

    

Commodity Name

Commodity


Symbol

Allowed Contracts

Max.

Tenor

Copper

HG

All 12 calendar months

12

Prior to the end of each month, SHIM determines the composition of the SCI and provides such information to the NYSE Arca. Values of the SCI are computed by the NYSE Arca and disseminated approximately every fifteen (15) seconds from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, which also publishes a daily SCI value at approximately 5:30 p.m., New York City time, under the index ticker symbol “SCI.” Only settlement and last-sale prices are used in the SCI’s calculation, bids and offers are not recognized — including limit-bid and limit-offer price quotes. Where no last-sale price exists, typically in the more deferred contract months, the previous days’ settlement price is used. This means that the underlying SCI may lag its theoretical value. This tendency to lag is evident at the end of the day when the SCI value is based on the settlement prices of the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, and explains why the underlying SCI often closes at or near the high or low for the day.

13

Composition of the SCI

The composition of the SCI on any given day, as determined and published by SHIM, is determinative of the benchmark for CPER. Neither the index methodology for the SCI nor any set of procedures, however, are capable of anticipating all possible circumstances and events that may occur with respect to the SCI and the methodology for its composition, weighting and calculation. Accordingly, a number of subjective judgments must be made in connection with the operation of the SCI that cannot be adequately reflected in this description of the SCI. All questions of interpretation with respect to the application of the provisions of the index methodology for the SCI, including any determinations that need to be made in the event of a market emergency or other extraordinary circumstances, will be resolved by SHIM.

Beginning with the commodity selection process that was scheduled to occur on December 31, 2020, the rebalancing period for the SCI changed from the first four business days of each month to the 11th-14th business days of each month, based on signals used for contract selection on the 10th business day of each month, rather than the last business day of each month. In addition, commencing with the first commodity selection date occurring after the change, the SCI was revised as follows: the number of Eligible Copper Futures Contracts was reduced, and the SCI itself is now comprised of one or three Eligible Copper Futures Contracts. Previously, the SCI could have been comprised of two or three Eligible Copper Futures Contracts. These revisions to the composition of the SCI are intended to ensure that the SCI components at any given time represent copper futures contracts for which there is an active and liquid trading market.

Contract Expirations

Because the SCI is comprised of actively traded contracts with scheduled expirations, it can be calculated only by reference to the prices of contracts for specified expiration, delivery or settlement periods, referred to as contract expirations. The contract expirations included in the SCI for each commodity during a given year are designated by SHIM, provided that each contract must be an active contract. An active contract for this purpose is a liquid, actively-traded contract expiration, as defined or identified by the relevant trading facility or, if no such definition or identification is provided by the relevant trading facility, as defined by standard custom and practice in the industry.

If a futures exchange, such as the COMEX, ceases trading in all contract expirations relating to an Eligible Copper Futures Contract, SHIM may designate a replacement contract. The replacement contract must satisfy the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the SCI. To the extent practicable, the replacement will be effected during the next monthly review of the composition of the SCI. If that timing is not practicable, SHIM will determine the date of the replacement based on a number of factors, including the differences between the existing Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contract and the replacement contract with respect to contractual specifications and contract expirations.

The designation of a replacement contract could affect the value of the SCI, either positively or negatively, depending on the price of the contract that is eliminated and the prices of the replacement contract. It is impossible, however, to predict the effect of these changes, if they occur, on the value of the SCI.

Contract Selection and Weighting

Weights for each of the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts are determined for the next month. The methodology used to calculate the SCI weighting is based solely on quantitative data using observable futures prices and is not subject to human bias.

The monthly weighting selection is a process based upon examination of the relevant futures prices for copper:

1) On CPER’s Selection Date (“CPER’s Selection Date”):

1)On CPER’s Selection Date (“CPER’s Selection Date”):
a)the copper futures curve is assessed to be in either backwardation or contango (as discussed below); and

b)the annualized percentage price difference between the Closest-to-Expiration Eligible Copper Futures Contract and each of the Next FourThree Eligible Copper Futures Contracts is calculated.are identified. For each month, the Closest-to-Expiration Eligible Copper Futures Contract and the Next FourThree Eligible Copper Futures Contracts are as follows:

14

Month

    

Month

January

January

February

February

March

March

April

April

May

May

June

June

July

July

August

August

September

September

October

October

November

November

December

Closest to Expiration Futures Contract

Mar

Mar

May

May

Jul

Jul

Sep

Sep

Dec

Dec

Dec

Mar

Closest-to-Expiration
Eligible Futures Contract
FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberJanuary
Next Four

Eligible Futures Contracts

April

Mar

May

June

May

July

Jul

August

Jul

September

Sep

October

Sep

November

Dec

December

Dec

January

Dec

February

Mar

March

Mar

May

July

July

Sep

Sep

Dec

Dec

Mar

Mar

Mar

May

May

May

July

June

Sep

July

Sep

August

Dec

September

Dec

October

Mar

November

Mar

December

May

January

May

February

May

March

Jul

April
JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMay
JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJune

Jul


A futures curve in backwardation occurs when the price of the closest-to-expiration contractEligible Copper Futures Contract is greater than or equal to the price of the thirdnext closest-to-expiration contract.Eligible Copper Futures Contract. These contracts will have expirations that are approximately two or three months apart. A curve not in backwardation is defined as being in contango, which occurs when the price of the closest-to-expiration contract is less than the price of the thirdnext closest-to-expiration contract.

2a) Backwardation: If the copper futures curve is in backwardation on the Selection Date, the SCI takes positions in the twofirst Eligible Copper Futures Contracts with the highest annualized percentage price difference, eachContract, weighted at 50%100%.

A hypothetical example is included below, with the two selected Eligible Copper Futures ContractsContract shaded below (the selected commodities are ranked 1 and 2):

below:

Contract

Copper Futures Contract

Expiration Date

Contract

Price

Nearest-to-maturity

November-10

December-10

374.70

Next nearest-to-maturity

March-11

365.20

Third nearest-to-maturity

Eligible Copper Futures Contracts

January-11

Price

December-10

365.20

374.70

Eligible Copper Futures Contracts Price  Annualized
Percentage
Price
Difference
  Ranking 
January-11  365.20   10.47%  1 
             
February-11  363.00   10.15%  4 
             
March-11  359.70   10.36%  3 
             
April-11  356.70   10.41%  2 

2b) Contango: If the copper futures curve is in contango, then the SCI takes positions in the first three Eligible Copper Futures Contracts, as follows: first, the SCI takes positions in the two Eligible Copper Futures Contracts with the highest annualized percentage price difference, each weighted at 25%; then, the SCI also takes a position in the closest-to-expiration December Eligible Future Contract that has expiration more distant than the fourth of the Next Four Eligible Copper Futures Contracts for the applicable month, which position is weighted at 50%33.33%.

A hypothetical example is included below, with the next twothree selected Eligible Copper Futures Contracts shaded below (the selected commodities are ranked 1 – 2):

indicated below:

Copper Futures Contract

Expiration Date

Contract
Price

Nearest-to-maturity

November-10

December-10

374.00

Next nearest-to-maturity

March-11

375.70

Third nearest-to-maturity

Eligible Copper Futures Contracts

January-11

Price

December-10

374.00

March-11

375.70

375.70

May-11

376.30

Eligible Copper Futures Contracts Price  Annualized
Percentage
Price
Difference
  Ranking 
January-11  375.70   (1.97)%  4 
             
February-11  376.00   (1.78)%  3 
             
March-11  376.30   (1.59)%  2 
             
April-11  376.40   (1.37)%  1 

Due to the dynamic monthly weighting calculation, the individual weights will vary-over time, depending on the price observations each month. CPER’s Selection Date for the SCI is the last10th business day of the calendar month.


15

The following graph shows the weights of the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts selected for inclusion in the SCI as of December 31, 2017.

2023.

SCI Commodity Weights as of December 31, 2023

Graphic

Portfolio Construction

The portfolio rebalancing takes place during the Rebalancing Period. At the end of each of the days in the Rebalancing Period one fourth of the prior month portfolio positions are replaced by the new weights for the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts determined on CPER’s Selection Date.

SCI Total Return Calculation

The value of the SCI on any business day is equal to the product of (i) the value of the SCI on the immediately preceding business day multiplied by (ii) one plus the sum of the day’s returns for another version of the SCI known as the SummerHaven Dynamic Copper Index Excess Return (“SCI ER”) (explained below) and one business day’s interest from the hypothetical Treasury Bill portfolio. The value of the SCI will be calculated and published by the NYSE Arca.

SCI Base Level

The SCI was set to 100 on January 2, 1991.

SCI ER Calculation

The total return of the SCI ER reflects the percentage change of the market values of the underlying commodity futures. During the Rebalancing Period, the SCI changes its contract holdings and weightings during a four day period. The value of the SCI ER at the end of a business day “t” is equal to the SCI ER value on day “t -1” multiplied by the sum of the daily percentage price changes of each commodity future factoring in each respective commodity future’s notional holding on day “t -1”.

Rebalancing Period

The SCI is rebalanced during the first 411th-14th business days of each calendarmonth, based on signals used for contract selection on the 10th business day of each month, when existing positions are placed by new positions and weightings based on the signals used for contract selection on the last business day of the prior calendar month as outlined above.

16

What is the SDAI?

The SDAI is an agricultural sector index designed to broadly represent major agricultural commodities while overweighting the components that are assessed to be in a low inventory state and underweighting the components assessed to be in a high inventory state.

The SDAI consistsTable of fourteen agricultural markets: soybeans, corn, soft red winter wheat, hard red winter wheat, soybean oil, soybean meal, canola, sugar, cocoa, coffee, cotton, live cattle, feeder cattle and lean hogs. Each agricultural commodity is assigned a base weight based on an assessment of market liquidity and the commodity’s overall economic importance. Each commodity is U.S. dollar based, with the exception of canola, which is quoted in Canadian dollars and converted to U.S. dollars for the purpose of the SDAI calculation.


Academic research by Professors Gorton, Rouwenhorst and Hayashi has shown that commodities in relatively low inventory states tend to have higher returns than commodities in relatively high inventory states. Furthermore, relative inventory comparisons can be estimated by the price-based signals momentum and basis. Momentum is the percentage price change in a commodity over the previous year. Basis is the annualized percentage difference between the nearest-to-maturity contract and the second nearest-to-maturity contract. Using these price-based signals, agricultural commodities determined to be in low inventory state will be weighted more heavily, and agricultural commodities in high inventory state will be weighted less heavily during any given month.

The SDAI is rules-based and rebalanced monthly based on observable price signals described above. In this context, the term “rules-based” is meant to indicate that the composition of the SDAI in any given month will be determined by quantitative formulas relating to the prices of the futures contracts that relate to the commodities that are included in the SDAI. Such formulas are not subject to adjustment based on other factors.

The overall return on the SDAI is generated by two components: (i) uncollateralized returns from the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts comprising the SDAI and (ii) a daily fixed income return reflecting the interest earned on a hypothetical 3-month U.S. Treasury Bill collateral portfolio, calculated using the weekly auction rate for the 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bills published by the U.S Department of the Treasury. SHIM is the owner of the SDAI.

Table 1 below lists the eligible agricultural commodities, the relevant Futures Exchange on which each Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contract is listed and quotation details. Table 2 lists the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts, their sector designation and maximum allowable tenor.

TABLE 1

CommodityDesignated ContractExchangeUnitsQuote
SoybeansSoybeansCBOT5,000 bushelsU.S. cents/bushel
CornCornCBOT5,000 bushelsU.S. cents/bushel
Soft Red Winter WheatSoft Red Winter WheatCBOT5,000 bushelsU.S. cents/bushel
Hard Red Winter WheatHard Red Winter WheatKCBT5,000 bushelsU.S. cents/bushel
Bean OilBean OilCBOT60,000 lbs.U.S. cents/pound
Soybean MealSoybean MealCBOT100 tonsUSD/ton
CoffeeCoffee “C”ICE-US37,500 lbs.U.S. cents/pound
CocoaCocoaICE-US10 metric tonsUSD/metric ton
SugarWorld Sugar No. 11ICE-US112,000 lbs.U.S. cents/pound
CanolaCanolaICE- CANADA20 tonnesCAD/tonne
CottonCottonICE-US50,000 lbs.U.S. cents/pound
Feeder CattleFeeder CattleCME50,000 lbs.U.S. cents/pound
Live CattleLive CattleCME40,000 lbs.U.S. cents/pound
Lean HogsLean HogsCME40,000 lbs.U.S. cents/pound

TABLE 2

Commodity NameCommodity SymbolAllowed ContractsMax.
Tenor
SoybeansSJan, Mar, May, July, Aug, Sep, Nov,12
CornCMar, May, July, Sep, Dec12
Soft Red Winter WheatWMar, May, July, Sep, Dec7
Hard Red Winter WheatKWMar, May, July, Sep, Dec5
Bean OilBOJan, Mar, May, July, Aug, Sep, Oct, Dec7
Soybean MealSMJan, Mar, May, July, Aug, Sep, Oct, Dec7
CoffeeKCMar, May, July, Sep, Dec7
CocoaCCMar, May, July, Sep, Dec7
SugarSBMar, May, July, Oct,7
CanolaRSJan, Mar, May, July, Nov5
CottonCTMar, May, July, Dec7
Feeder CattleFCJan, Mar, April, May, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov5
Live CattleLCFeb, April, June, Aug, Oct, Dec5
Lean HogsLHFeb, April, June, July, Aug, Oct, Dec5

Prior to the end of each month, SHIM determines the composition of the SDAI and provides such information to the NYSE Arca. Values of the SDAI are computed by the NYSE Arca and disseminated approximately every fifteen (15) seconds from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, which also publishes a daily SDAI value at approximately 5:30 p.m., New York City time, under the index ticker symbol “SDAITR”. Only settlement and last-sale prices are used in the SDAI’s calculation, bids and offers are not recognized; including limit-bid and limit-offer price quotes. Where no last-sale price exists, typically in the more deferred contract months, the previous days’ settlement price is used. This means that the underlying SDAI may lag its theoretical value. This tendency to lag is evident at the end of the day when the SDAI value is based on the settlement prices of the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts, and explains why the underlying SDAI often closes at or near the high or low for the day.

Currency Conversion

Canola seed futures trade on the ICE Futures Canada and are denominated in Canadian dollars. Canola futures prices are divided by the USD/CAD foreign exchange spot price for purposes of index calculation and commodity weighting calculations. The USD/CAD price used for canola futures for the daily SDAI value is the 3:00 p.m. EST USD/CAD price quoted by Bloomberg under currency ticker “USDCAD F150”.

Composition of the SDAI

The composition of the SDAI on any given day, as determined and published by SHIM, is determinative of the benchmark for USAG. Neither the SDAI methodology nor any set of procedures, however, are capable of anticipating all possible circumstances and events that may occur with respect to the SDAI and the methodology for its composition, weighting and calculation. Accordingly, a number of subjective judgments must be made in connection with the operation of the SDAI that cannot be adequately reflected in this description of the SDAI. All questions of interpretation with respect to the application of the provisions of the SDAI methodology, including any determinations that need to be made in the event of a market emergency or other extraordinary circumstances, will be resolved by SHIM.

Contract Expirations

Because the SDAI is comprised of actively traded contracts with scheduled expirations, it can be calculated only by reference to the prices of contracts for specified expiration, delivery or settlement periods, referred to as contract expirations. The contract expirations included in the SDAI for each commodity during a given year are designated by SHIM, provided that each contract must be an active contract. An active contract for this purpose is a liquid, actively-traded contract expiration, as defined or identified by the relevant trading facility or, if no such definition or identification is provided by the relevant trading facility, as defined by standard custom and practice in the industry.

If a Futures Exchange ceases trading in all contract expirations relating to a particular Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contract, SHIM may designate a replacement contract on the particular agricultural commodity. The replacement contract must satisfy the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the SDAI. To the extent practicable, the replacement will be effected during the next monthly review of the composition of the SDAI. If that timing is not practicable, SHIM will determine the date of the replacement based on a number of factors, including the differences between the existing Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contract and the replacement contract with respect to contractual specifications and contract expirations.

If a Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contract is eliminated and there is no replacement contract, the underlying agricultural commodity will necessarily drop out of the SDAI. The designation of a replacement contract, or the elimination of an agricultural commodity from the SDAI because of the absence of a replacement contract, could affect the value of the SDAI, either positively or negatively, depending on the price of the contract that is eliminated and the prices of the remaining contracts. It is impossible, however, to predict the effect of these changes, if they occur, on the value of the SDAI.

Commodity Weighting

Each of the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts will remain in the SDAI from month to month. Weights for each of the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts in the SDAI are determined for the next month. The methodology used to calculate the SDAI weighting is based solely on quantitative data using observable futures prices and is not subject to human bias.

The monthly weighting selection is a three-step process based upon examination of the relevant futures prices for each agricultural commodity:

1)The annualized percentage price difference between the closest-to-expiration Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contract and the next closest-to-expiration Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contract is calculated for each of the 14 eligible agricultural commodities on the fifth business day prior to the first business day of the next calendar month (the “USAG’s Selection Date”). The four agricultural commodities with the highest percentage price difference are selected.

2)For the remaining 10 eligible agricultural commodities, the percentage price change of each agricultural commodity over the previous year is calculated, as measured by the change in the price of the closest-to- expiration Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contract on the Selection Date from the price of the closest-to-expiration Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contract a year prior to the Selection Date. The three agricultural commodities with the highest percentage price change are selected.

3)For the seven commodities selected through basis (step 1) and momentum (step 2), each commodity weight is increased by 2% above its base weighting for the following month. For the remaining seven commodities not selected, each commodity weight is decreased by 2% below its base weighting for the following month.

Due to the dynamic monthly agricultural commodity weighting calculation, the individual agricultural commodity weights will vary over time, depending on the price observations each month. USAG’s Selection Date for the SDAI is the fifth business day prior to the first business day of the next calendar month.

 

SDAI Commodity Weights

As of December 31, 2017

Contract Selection

For each agricultural commodity in the SDAI, the index selects a specific Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contract with a tenor (i.e., contract month) among the eligible tenors (the range of contract months) based upon the relative prices of the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts within the eligible range of contract months. The previous notwithstanding, the contract expiration is not changed for that month if a Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contract remains in the SDAI, as long as the contract does not expire or enter its notice period in the subsequent month.

Portfolio Construction

The portfolio rebalancing takes place during the Rebalancing Period. At the end of each of the days in the last four business days of each month (the “Rebalancing Period”) one fourth of the prior month portfolio positions are replaced by the new commodity weights for the commodity contracts determined on USAG’s Selection Date.

SDAI Total Return Calculation

The value of the SDAI on any business day is equal to the product of (i) the value of the SDAI on the immediately preceding business day multiplied by (ii) one plus the sum of the day’s returns for another version of the SDAI known as the SummerHaven Dynamic Agriculture Index Excess Return (“SDAI ER”) (explained below) and one business day’s interest from the hypothetical Treasury Bill portfolio. The value of the Agriculture will be calculated and published by the NYSE Arca.

SDAI Base Level

The SDAI was set to 100 on January 2, 1991.

SDAI ER Calculation

The total return of the SDAI ER reflects the percentage change of the market values of the underlying Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts. During the Rebalancing Period, the SDAI changes its contract holdings and weightings during a four day period. The value of the SDAI ER at the end of a business day “t” is equal to the SDAI ER value on day “t -1” multiplied by the sum of the daily percentage price changes of each commodity future factoring in each respective commodity future’s notional holding on day “t -1”.

18 

Rebalancing Period

During the Rebalancing Period, existing positions are replaced by new positions based on the signals used for contract selection as outlined above. At the end of the first day of the Rebalancing Period, the signals are observed and on the second day a new portfolio is constructed that is equally weighted in terms of notional positions in the newly selected contracts.

2018 Holiday Schedule for All Applicable Indices

None of the Applicable Indices will be computed on the following weekdays in 2018:

January1
January15
February19
March30
May28
July4
September3
November22
December25

The holiday schedule is subject to change. None of the Trust Series will accept orders for Creation Baskets or Redemption Baskets on these days.

Treasuries, Cash and Cash Equivalents

Each Trust Series seeks to have the aggregate “notional” amount of the Applicable Interests it holds approximate at all times its aggregate NAV. At any given time, however, most of the Trust Series holdings are in short-term Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents that support such Trust Series’ positions in Applicable Interests. For example, the purchase of an Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract with a stated or notional amount of $10 million would not require a Trust Series to pay $10 million upon entering into the contract; rather, only a margin deposit, generally of 5% to 30% of the notional amount, would be required. To secure its obligations under Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, a Trust Series would deposit the required margin with the FCM and would separately hold its remaining assets through its Custodian in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents. Such remaining assets may be used to meet future margin payments that a Trust Series is required to make on its Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts. Other Related Investments typically also involve collateral requirements that represent a small fraction of their notional amounts, so most of a Trust Series’ assets dedicated to Other Related Investments will also be held in Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents.

Each of the Trust Series earns income from the Treasuries and/or cash equivalents that it purchases and on the cash it holds through the Custodian. USCF anticipates that the earned income will increase each Trust Series’ NAV. Each Trust Series applies the earned income to the acquisition of additional investments or uses it to pay its expenses. If a Trust Series reinvests the earned income, it makes investments that are consistent with its investment objective.

What are the Trading Policies of the Trust Series?

Liquidity

Each Trust Series invests only in Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts that, in the opinion of USCF, are traded in sufficient volume to permit the ready taking and liquidation of positions in these financial interests and in OTC Applicable Interests that, in the opinion of USCF, may be readily liquidated with the original counterparty or through a third party assuming a Trust Series’ position.

Spot Commodities

While certain futures contracts can be physically settled, none of the Trust Series intends to take or make physical delivery. However, a Trust Series may from time to time trade in Other Related Investments, including contracts based on the spot price of the applicable commodities comprising the Applicable Index.

Leverage

LeverageAlthough permitted to do so under the Trust Agreement, the Trust Series has not and does not intend to leverage their assets and makes investments accordingly. Consistent with the foregoing, each Trust Series’ announced investment intentions noted above, and any changes thereto, will take into account the need for the relevant Trust Series to make permitted investments that also allow it to maintain adequate liquidity to meet its margin and collateral requirements and to avoid, to the extent reasonably possible, the Trust Series becoming leveraged. If market conditions require it, these risk reduction procedures, including the sale of investments, may occur on short notice if they occur other than during a roll or rebalance period.

Each Trust Series does not and will not borrow money or use debt to satisfy its margin or collateral obligations in respect of its investments, but it could become leveraged if the Trust Series were to hold insufficient assets that would allow it to meet not only the current, but also future, margin or collateral obligations required for such investments. Such a circumstance could occur if the Trust Series were to hold assets that have a value of less than zero.

USCF endeavors to have the value of aeach Trust Series’ Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents, whether held by a Trust Series or posted as margin or other collateral, at all times approximate the aggregate market value of its obligations under its Applicable InterestsFutures Contracts and Other Related Investments. Commodity pools’ trading positions in Futures Contracts or Other Related Investments are typically required to be secured by the deposit of margin funds that represent only a small percentage of a futures contract (or other commodity interest’s) entire market value. While USCF does not intend to leverage the assets of any Trust Series, it is not prohibited from doing so under the Trust Agreement.

19 

Borrowings

Borrowings are not used by any Trust Series unless it is required to borrow money in the event of physical delivery, if it trades in cash commodities, or for short-term needs created by unexpected redemptions. None of the Trust Series plans to establish credit lines.

17

OTC Derivatives (Including Spreads and Straddles)

In addition to Futures Contracts and options on Futures Contracts, derivative contracts that are tied to various commodities are entered into outside of public exchanges. These OTC contracts are usually entered into between two parties in private contracts. Unlike most of the exchange-traded futures contracts or exchange-traded options on futures contracts, each party to such a contract bears the credit risk of the other party,i.e., the risk that the other party may not be able to perform its obligations under its contract. To reduce the credit risk that arises in connection with such contracts, each Trust Series maywill generally enter into an agreement with each counterparty based on the Master Agreement published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) that provides for the netting of its overall exposure to its counterparty and requires the posting by each party to cover the mark-to-market exposure of a counterparty to the other counterparty.

USCF assesses or reviews, as appropriate, the creditworthiness of each potential or existing counterparty to an OTC contract pursuant to guidelines approved by USCF’s Board.

Each Trust Series may enter into certain transactions where an OTC component is exchanged for a corresponding futures contract (“Exchange for Related Position” or “EFRP” transactions). These EFRP transactions may expose a Trust Series to counterparty risk during the interim period between the execution of the OTC component and the exchange for a corresponding futures contract. Generally, the counterparty risk from the EFRP transaction will exist only on the day of execution.

Each Trust Series may employ spreads or straddles in its trading to mitigate the differences in its investment portfolio and its goal of tracking the price of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts. Each Trust Series would use a spread when it chooses to take simultaneous long and short positions in futures written on the same underlying asset, but with different delivery months.

During the 12 month reporting period ended December 31, 2017,2023, each Trust Series limited its derivatives activities to Futures Contracts.

Pyramiding

None of the Trust Series has employed and will not employ the technique, commonly known as pyramiding, in which the speculator uses unrealized profits on existing positions as variation margin for the purchase or sale of additional positions in the same or another commodity interest.

Who are the Service Providers?

Custodian, Registrar, Transfer Agent, and Administrator

In its capacity as the Custodian for each Trust Series, BBH&Co. may hold each Trust Series’ Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents pursuantUSCF engaged The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon”), a New York corporation authorized to do a custodial agreement. BBH&Co. is also the registrar and transfer agent for the shares. In addition, in its capacity as Administrator for each Trust Series, BBH&Co. performs certain administrative and accounting services forbanking business (“BNY Mellon”), to provide each Trust Series and prepareseach of the Related Public Funds with certain SEC, NFAcustodial, administrative and CFTC reports on behalfaccounting, and transfer agency services, pursuant to the following agreements with BNY Mellon dated as of each Trust Series.March 20, 2020 (together, the “BNY Mellon Agreements”), which were effective as of April 1, 2020: (i) a Custody Agreement; (ii) a Fund Administration and Accounting Agreement; and (iii) a Transfer Agency and Service Agreement. USCF pays BBH&Co.’sthe fees of BNY Mellon for these services.

BBH&Co.’s principal business address is 50 Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02110-1548. BBH&Co., a private bank founded in 1818, is neither a publicly held company nor insuredits services under the BNY Mellon Agreements and such fees are determined by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. BBH&Co. is authorizedparties from time to conduct a commercial banking business in accordance with the provisions of Article IV of the New York State Banking Law, New York Banking Law §§160–181, and is subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the New York State Department of Financial Services. BBH&Co. is also licensed to conduct a commercial banking business by the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Pennsylvania and is subject to supervision and examination by the banking supervisors of those states.

time.

Each Trust Series also employs ALPS Distributors as its marketing agent USCF pays the Marketing Agent an annual fee. In no event may the aggregate compensation paid to the Marketing Agent and any affiliate of USCF for distribution-related services in connection with the offering of shares exceed ten percent (10%) of the gross proceeds of the offering.

Marketing Agent

Each Trust Series also employs ALPS Distributors, Inc. (“ALPS Distributors”) as the Marketing Agent. USCF pays the Marketing Agent an annual fee. In no event may the aggregate compensation paid to the Marketing Agent and any affiliate of USCF for distribution-related services in connection with the offering of shares exceed ten percent (10%) of the gross proceeds of the offering.

ALPS Distributors’ principal business address is 1290 Broadway, Suite 1100, Denver, CO 80203. ALPS Distributors is a broker-dealer registered with the SEC and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.

18

Futures Commission Merchants

EachRBC Capital Markets, LLC

On June 25, 2018, the Trust Series hason behalf of USCI and CPER entered into an agreementa Futures and Cleared Derivatives Transactions Customer Account Agreement with Wells Fargo Securities,RBC Capital Markets, LLC whereby Wells Fargo Securities, LLC will(“RBC Capital” or “RBC”) to serve as a Futures Commission Merchantthe futures commission merchant (“FCM”) for USCI and CPER. This agreement requires RBC Capital to provide services to USCI and CPER, in connection with the purchase and sale of Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments for USCI and Futures Contracts and other Copper-Related Investments for CPER, in each Trust Series. Wells Fargo Securities, LLCcase that may be purchased or sold by or through RBC Capital for USCI’s or CPER’s account, as applicable. For the period June 25, 2018 and after, USCI and CPER pay RBC Capital commissions for executing and clearing trades on their behalf.

RBC Capital’s primary address is 200 Vesey St., New York, NY 10281. As of June 25, 2019, RBC Capital became the futures clearing broker for USCI and CPER. RBC Capital is registered in the United States with FINRA as a broker-dealer and with the CFTC as an indirect wholly owned subsidiaryFCM. RBC Capital is a member of Wells Fargo & Co.various U.S. futures and hassecurities exchanges.

RBC Capital is a principal placelarge broker dealer subject to many different complex legal and regulatory requirements. As a result, certain of business at 550 S. Tryon Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202.

Although Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, in its capacity as Broker-DealerRBC Capital’s regulators may from time to time conduct investigations, initiate enforcement proceedings and/or FCM,enter into settlements with RBC Capital with respect to issues raised in various investigations. RBC Capital complies fully with its regulators in all investigations being conducted and in all settlements it reaches. In addition, RBC Capital is and has been subject to regulatory disciplinarya variety of civil legal claims in various jurisdictions, a variety of settlement agreements and a variety of orders, awards and judgments made against it by courts and tribunals, both in regard to such claims and investigations. RBC Capital complies fully with all settlements it reaches and all orders, awards and judgments made against it.

RBC Capital has been named as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions and other litigation including those described below, arising in connection with its activities. Certain of the actual or threatened legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. RBC Capital is also involved, in other reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental and self-regulatory agencies regarding RBC Capital’s business, including among other matters, involvingaccounting and operational matters, certain of which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other sanctions,relief.

RBC Capital contests liability and/or the amount of damages as appropriate in each pending matter. In view of the date hereof neither Wells Fargo Securities, LLC norinherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases where claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages or where investigations and proceedings are in the early stages, RBC Capital cannot predict the loss or range of loss, if any, related to such matters; how or if such matters will be resolved; when they will ultimately be resolved; or what the eventual settlement, fine, penalty or other relief, if any, might be. Subject to the foregoing, RBC Capital believes, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of its principals has beensuch pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on the subjectconsolidated financial condition of any material administrative, civil or criminal action, including any actionRBC Capital.

On April 27, 2017, pursuant to an offer of settlement, a Panel of the Chicago Board of Trade Business Conduct Committee (“Panel”) found that has been pending, on appeal, or concluded withinRBC Capital engaged in EFRP transactions which failed to satisfy the last five years, except as follows:


NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION The National Credit Union Administration, asRules of the successor to various federal credit unions, has asserted claims against Wachovia Capital Markets, WFS’s predecessor and Wachovia Mortgage Loan Trust (“WMLT”) (as the issuerChicago Board of residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)Trade (the “Chicago Board of Trade”) in three separateone or more ways. Specifically, the Panel found that RBC Capital traders entered into EFRP trades in which RBC Capital accounts were on both sides of the transactions. While the purpose of the transactions was to transfer positions between the RBC Capital accounts, the Panel found that the manner in which the trades occurred violated the Chicago Board of Trade’s prohibition on wash trades. The Panel found that RBC Capital thereby violated CBOT Rules 534 and (legacy) 538.B. and C. In accordance with the settlement offer, the Panel ordered RBC Capital to pay a $175,000 fine. On October 1, 2019, the CFTC issued an order filing and settling charges against RBC Capital for the above activity, as well as related charges. The order required that RBC Capital cease and desist from violating the applicable regulations, pay a $5 million civil monetary penalty, and comply with various conditions, including conditions regarding public statements and future cooperation with the CFTC.

Various regulators are conducting inquiries regarding potential violations of antitrust law by a number of banks and other entities, including RBC Capital, regarding foreign exchange trading. Beginning in 2015, putative class actions were brought against RBC Capital and/or Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Capital’s indirect parent, in federal courts in Kansas (the “Kansas Actions”), California (the “California Action”),the U.S. and New York (the “New York Action”) as follows: National Credit Union Administration Board v. Wachovia Mortgage Loan Trust; National Credit Union Administration Board as Liquidating Agent of Western Corporate Federal Credit Union v. RBS Securities, Inc. f/k/a RBS Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., et al.; and National Credit Union Administration Board v. Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC n/k/a Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.Canada. These actions seekwere each brought against multiple foreign exchange dealers and allege, among other things, collusive behavior in global foreign exchange trading. In August 2018, the U.S. District Court entered a final order approving RBC Capital’s settlement with class plaintiffs. In November 2018, certain institutional plaintiffs who had previously opted-out of participating in the settlement filed their own lawsuit in U.S. District Court. In May 2020, the U.S. District Court dismissed RBC Capital from the opt-out action, but granted the plaintiffs’ motion to recover losses associatedamend the complaint. The Canadian class actions remain pending and RBC Capital has reached a settlement for an immaterial amount with respect to an action

19

brought by a class of indirect purchasers. RBC Capital is awaiting the court’s final approval of the settlement. In October 2020, RBC Capital and Royal Bank of Canada moved to dismiss the amended complaint. On July 28, 2021, the court dismissed Royal Bank of Canada from the case but denied the motion as to RBC Capital. Based on the facts currently known, it is not possible at this time for management to predict the ultimate outcome of these collective matters or the timing of their ultimate resolution.

On April 13, 2015, RBC Capital’s affiliate, Royal Bank of Canada Trust Company (Bahamas) Limited (“RBC Bahamas”), was charged in France with complicity in tax fraud. RBC Bahamas believes that its actions did not violate French law and contested the charge in the French court. The trial of this matter has concluded and a verdict was delivered on January 12, 2017, acquitting the company and the other defendants and on June 29, 2018, the French appellate court affirmed the acquittals. On January 6, 2021, the French Supreme Court issued a judgment reversing the decision of the French Court of Appeal dated June 29, 2018 and sent the case back to the French Court of Appeal for rehearing and therefore the proceeding is currently awaiting a new trial with the credit unions’ investmentFrench Court of Appeal.

Royal Bank of Canada and other panel banks for the setting of the U.S. dollar London interbank offered rate (“LIBOR”) have been named as defendants in RMBS underwritten or sold by WCM and/or issued by WMLT. These three matters were resolved in October of 2015 for $53 million and have now been dismissed.

New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund v. NovaStar Mortgage, et al. This is a class actionprivate lawsuits filed in the United StatesU.S. with respect to the setting of U.S. dollar LIBOR including a number of class action lawsuits which have been consolidated before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (“the Court”) involving six different NovaStar offeringsYork. RBC Capital has also been named as a defendant in which Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC served as one of those lawsuits. The complaints in those private lawsuits assert claims under various U.S. laws, including U.S. antitrust laws, the underwriters. Plaintiff alleged that the offering documents were materially misleading because they failed to disclose that NovaStar, which originated or acquired the loans backing the certificates, systematically disregarded its lending guidelines. In rulings in March 2011 and March 2012, the Court dismissed the action with prejudice. In March 2013 the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (“Second Circuit”) reversed the rulings and directed the Court to consider the possible inclusion with regard to the other five offerings. In February 2015 the Court added the other five offerings back to the case. The parties subsequently reached an agreement in principle to settle the matter for $165MM, with approximately $54MM representing Wells Fargo’s contribution to the settlement. The parties filed a motion for preliminary approval of the settlement with the Court on March 15, 2017. The Court issued an order granting the motion on May 10, 2017. Wells Fargo submitted its contribution to the settlement on June 1, 2017. Subsequently, one of the investors in the securities at issue, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”), did not submit timely its opt out notice and is now contesting the settlement. On September 12, 2017, the Court ruled that FHFA had received notice and therefore had waived the right to opt out. The Court set the final hearing to approve the settlement for September 20, 2017. FHFA filed an emergency appeal and motion for stay of the September 20, 2017 hearing with the Second Circuit. On September 19, 2017, the Second Circuit granted a temporary stay of the September 20, 2017 hearing while FHFA’s emergency motion is considered by a three-judge panel. On October 19, 2017, the Second Circuit entered an order denying FHFA’s motion for a stay of the Court’s proceedings. Wells Fargo awaits instruction from the Court as to rescheduling of the final approval hearing, which Wells Fargo expects will be the next step in the case.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. RHODE ISLAND COMMERCE CORP., ET AL. On March 7, 2016, the SEC filed a complaint in federal court for the District of Rhode Island against the Rhode Island Commerce Corp. (formerly the Rhode Island Economic Development Corp. (EDC)), two of the EDC’s officers, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and Peter Cannava, a banker at Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. The complaint charges Wells Fargo Securities, LLC with violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and (a)(3) of the Exchange Act, MSRB Rules G-17 and G-32, and Section 15B(c)(1) of theU.S. Commodity Exchange Act, and charges Mr. Cannava with aiding and abetting Wells Fargo Securities, LLC’s violations. The complaint alleges thatstate law. In addition to the LIBOR actions, in January 2019, a 2010 private offeringnumber of municipal securities by the EDC, for which Wells Fargo Securities, LLC served as lead placement agent, failed to disclose material information regarding the fees Wells Fargo Securities, LLC obtained and the financial solvencyinstitutions, including RBC Capital, were named in a purported class action in New York alleging violations of the underlying project, which was for the benefitU.S. antitrust laws and common law principles of video game company 38 Studios, LLC. The case isunjust enrichment in the discovery stage.

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC is a defendantsetting of LIBOR after the Intercontinental Exchange took over administration of the benchmark interest rate from the British Bankers’ Association in two actions filed in2014 (the “ICE LIBOR action”). On March 26, 2020, the Southern District of New York, captionedLoreley Financing (Jersey) No. 3 Limited et al v. Wells Fargo Securities LLC et al. andLBBW Luxemburg S.A. v. Wells Fargo Securities LLC, f/k/a Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Fortis Securities, LLC,  in which certain investors have brought claims against Wells Fargo Securities, LLC seeking compensation for losses in CDOs underwritten by its predecessor Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC.defendants’ motion to dismiss the ICE LIBOR action was granted. The cases allege a variety of state and federal claims relating to improper disclosures and omissions associated with the transactions. TheLoreley case is in the discovery stage; the potential liability is not known. In theLBBW case, on March 30, 2017, the court granted Wells Fargo’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case. LBBW hasplaintiffs filed a notice of appeal of that ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 24, 2020 and, thereafter, sought to substitute named plaintiffs. The Second Circuit permitted substitution, but has not yet ruled on the merits of the appeal. In August 2020, Royal Bank of Canada and other financial institutions were named as defendants in a separate, individual (i.e., non-class) action filed in California alleging that the usage and setting of LIBOR constitutes per se collusive conduct. In November 2020 and May 2021, plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction with respect to the setting of ICE LIBOR; defendants opposed these motions and sought to transfer the matter to New York. On June 3, 2021, the court denied defendants’ motion to transfer. Defendants then moved to dismiss. Plaintiffs’ motions for a preliminary injunction and defendants’ motion to dismiss remain pending. Based on the facts currently known, it is not possible at this time to predict the ultimate outcome of these proceedings or the timing of their resolution.

Please see RBC Capital’s Form BD, which is available on the FINRA BrokerCheck program, for more details.

RBC Capital will act only as clearing broker for a Trust Series and as such will be paid commissions for executing and clearing trades on behalf of a Trust Series. RBC Capital has not passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this annual report on Form 10-K. RBC Capital will not act in any supervisory capacity with respect to USCF or participate in the management of USCF or a Trust Series.

RBC Capital is not affiliated with any Trust Series or USCF. Therefore, neither USCF nor any Trust Series believes that there are any conflicts of interest with RBC Capital or its trading principals arising from its acting as the FCM for the Trust Series.

Marex North America, LLC

On August 23, 2021, the Trust, on behalf of USCI and CPER, entered into a Commodity Futures Customer Agreement with RCG Division of Marex Spectron, now Marex North America, LLC (“MNA”) to serve as an FCM for USCI and CPER. This agreement requires MNA to provide services to USCI and CPER in connection with the purchase and sale of futures that may be purchased or sold by or through MNA for USCI’s or CPER’s account, as applicable. Under this agreement, USCI and CPER pay MNA commissions for executing and clearing trades on their behalf.

MNA’s primary address is 140 E 4th Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10017. MNA is registered in the United States with FINRA as a broker-dealer and with the CFTC as an FCM. MNA is a member of various U.S. futures exchanges.

MNA is a large broker dealer subject to many different complex legal and regulatory requirements. As a result, certain of MNA’s regulators may from time to time conduct investigations, initiate enforcement proceedings and/or enter into settlements with MNA with respect to issues raised in various investigations. MNA complies fully with its regulators in all investigations which may be conducted and in all settlements it may reach.

20

MNA settled with the CFTC in September 2020 to pay a monetary penalty of $250,000 for failure to meet minimum adjusted net capital requirements. MNA improperly accounted for deductions arising out of an agreement that it entered to guarantee a revolving line of credit for an affiliated company when computing its net capital requirements.

MNA will act only as clearing broker for a Trust Series and as such will be paid commissions for executing and clearing trades on behalf of a Trust Series. MNA has not passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this annual report on Form 10-K. MNA will not act in any supervisory capacity with respect to USCF or participate in the management of USCF or a Trust Series.

MNA is not affiliated with any Trust Series or USCF. Therefore, neither USCF nor any Trust Series believes that there are any conflicts of interest with MNA or its trading principals arising from its acting as the FCM for the Trust Series.

Commodity Trading Advisor

Currently, USCF employs SummerHaven as a commodity trading advisor. SummerHaven provides advisory services to USCF with respect to the SDCI, the SCI and the SDAI and investment decisions for each of USCI CPER and USAG.CPER. Its advisory services include, but are not limited to, general consultation regarding the calculation and maintenance of the SDCI the SCI and the SDAI, anticipated changes to the SDCI, the SCI and the SDAI and the nature of the SDCI’s and the SCI’s and the SDAI’s current or anticipated component securities.investments. For these services, USCF pays fees to SummerHaven as set forth in the table below.

SummerHaven’s principal business address is 1266 East Main Street, Soundview Plaza, Fourth Floor, Stamford, CT 06902. SummerHaven is a commodity trading advisor and commodity pool operator registered with the NFA.

Other than as indicated below, there have been no material, civil, administrative, or criminal proceedings pending, on appeal, or concluded against SummerHaven or its principals in the past five (5) years.

On May 18, 2021, without admitting or denying the CFTC’s findings or conclusions, SummerHaven settled a CFTC administrative action arising out of certain trades executed in or around July of 2018 for the commodity futures portfolio of a third-party. Such trades were intended to move positions from one FCM to another. The CFTC alleged that the trades constituted “wash” trades, which are prohibited under the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations promulgated thereunder. The CFTC also alleged that the trades were non-competitive transactions and, therefore, violated CFTC regulation 1.38, and that their entry evidenced a supervisory failure. In connection with the settlement, SummerHaven has agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $500,000 and to cease and desist from further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations, as charged.

USCF has also entered into a licensing agreement with SummerHaven. Under this licensing agreement, SummerHaven has sub-licensed to each of USCI CPER and USAGCPER the use of certain names and marks, including the SDCI with respect to USCI and the SCI with respect to CPER, and the SDAI with respect to USAG, which SummerHaven licensed from SHIM, the owner of the SDCI the SCI and the SDAI.SCI. For this license, USCF pays a fee to SummerHaven as set forth in the table below.

SHIM’s principal business address is 1266 East Main Street, Soundview Plaza, Fourth Floor, Stamford, CT 06902.

Summary of Risk Factors

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the information in “Item 1A. Risk Factors”, including, but not limited to, the following risks:

Infectious disease outbreaks like COVID-19 could negatively affect the valuation and performance of CPER’s investments.
The NAV of a Trust Series’ shares relates directly to the value of its assets invested in accordance with the Applicable Index and other assets held by a Trust Series and fluctuations in the prices of these assets could materially adversely affect an investment in a Trust Series’ shares.
An investment in a Trust Series may provide little or no diversification benefits. Thus, in a declining market, a Trust Series may have no gains to offset losses from other investments, and an investor may suffer losses on an investment in a Trust Series while incurring losses with respect to other asset classes.
Historical performance of a Trust Series and its Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts is not indicative of future performance.
The market price at which investors buy or sell shares may be significantly more or less than NAV.
Daily percentage changes in a Trust Series’ NAV may not correlate with daily percentage changes in the price of the Applicable Index.

21

An investment in a Trust Series is not a proxy for investing in the commodities markets, and the daily percentage changes in the price of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, or the NAV of the Trust Series, may not correlate with daily percentage changes in the spot price of the physical commodities that underlie the Applicable Index.
Daily percentage changes in the price of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract may not correlate with daily percentage changes in the spot price of the corresponding commodity.
The price relationship between each Applicable Index at any point in time and the Futures Contracts that will become the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts on the next rebalancing date will vary and may impact both a Trust Series’ total return and the degree to which its total return tracks that of commodity price indices.
Accountability levels, position limits, and daily price fluctuation limits set by the exchanges have the potential to cause tracking error, which could cause the price of shares to substantially vary from the Applicable Index.
Risk mitigation measures imposed by the Trust Series’ FCMs have the potential to cause tracking error by limiting a Trust Series’ investments, including its ability to fully invest in the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract and other Futures Contracts, which could cause the price of the Trust Series’ shares to substantially vary from the price of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.
An investor’s tax liability may exceed the amount of distributions, if any, on its shares.
An investor’s allocable share of taxable income or loss may differ from its economic income or loss on its shares.
Items of income, gain, deduction, loss and credit with respect to shares could be reallocated, and for taxable periods beginning after December 31, 2017, the Trust Series could be liable for U.S. federal income tax, if the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) does not accept the assumptions and conventions applied by the Trust Series in allocating those items, with potential adverse consequences for an investor.
Each Trust Series could be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, which may substantially reduce the value of the shares.
The Trust is organized as a Delaware statutory trust, but each Trust Series is treated as a limited partnership in accordance with the provisions of the Trust Agreement and applicable state law, and therefore, each Trust Series has a more complex tax treatment than traditional mutual funds.
If a Trust Series is required to withhold tax with respect to any Non-U.S. shareholders, the cost of such withholding may be borne by all shareholders.
The impact of changes in U.S. federal income tax laws on the Trust Series is uncertain.
Each Trust Series will be subject to credit risk with respect to counterparties to OTC contracts entered into by the Trust on behalf of a Trust Series or held by special purpose or structured vehicles.
Valuing OTC derivatives may be less certain than actively traded financial instruments.

22

Fees of USCI CPER and USAGCPER

Fees and Compensation Arrangements with USCF, Non-Affiliated Service Providers and the Trustee

Service Provider

Compensation Paid by Each Trust Series and USCF

United States Commodity Funds LLC, Sponsor

Each Trust Series pays USCF a management fee based on its average daily net assets and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.80% for USCI and 0.65% for each of CPER and USAG.CPER.(1)

BBH&Co.,

BNY Mellon – Custodian and Administrator(3)

Minimum amount of $75,000 annually for its

Provides custody, fund accounting and fund administration and transfer agency services rendered to the Trust Series and the Related Public Funds, as well as a $20,000Funds’ based on average AUM. The annual fee for its transfer agency services. In addition, an asset-based charge of (a) 0.06%fees for the first $500 million ofTrust Series and the Trust Series’ and thecombined Related Public Funds’ combined net assets, (b) 0.0465%may range from $0.4 million to $2.4 million depending on average AUM for the Trust Series’ and the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets greater than $500 million but less than $1 billion, and (c) 0.035% once the Trust Series’ and the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets exceed $1 billion.any given year.(2)

ALPS Distributors - Marketing Agent

Each Trust Series pays

0.06% on total net assets up to $3 billion and 0.04% on total net assets in excess of $3 billion.billion for each Trust Series through September 30, 2022, and commencing October 1, 2022, USCI pays 0.10% on total net assets and CPER pays 0.025% on total net assets.(2)

WFS,

FCM and Clearing Broker

Each of Trust Series pays approximately $3.50$3.00 per buy or sell;sell on average; charges may vary.

SummerHaven, Commodity Trading Advisor

Advisory Fee:

On behalf of USCI, USCF pays a percentage of the average daily assets of USCI that is equal to the percentage fees paid to USCF by USCI minus 0.14%, with that result multiplied by 0.5, minus 0.06%.(2)

On behalf of each of CPER, and USAG, USCF pays a percentage of the average daily assets that is equal to the percentage fees paid to USCF by each of CPER and USAG minus 0.18%, with that result multiplied by 0.5, minus 0.06%.(2)

Sublicense Fee:

For each Trust Series, USCF paidpays $15,000 for theeach calendar year, 2017, plus an annual fee of 0.06% of the average daily assets of each Trust Series.(2)

 

Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee

On behalf of the Trust, USCF pays $3,000$3,300 annually.(2)

(1)(1)USCI CPER or USAG,CPER, as applicable, pays this compensation. Effective January 1, 2016, USCF permanently lowered the management fee to 0.80% (80 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for USCI and 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for both CPER and USAG, respectively.CPER. From May 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015, USCF contractually agreed to lower the management fee to 0.80% per annum of average daily total net assets for USCI, and 0.65% per annum of average daily total net assets for each of CPER and USAG.CPER. Prior to May 1, 2014, USCF waived the management fee on a discretionary basis paid by each of CPER and USAG from 0.95% per annum of average daily total net assets, to 0.65% and 0.80% per annum of average daily total net assets, respectively.

(2)(2)USCF pays this compensation.

(3)BNY Mellon has served as the Custodian and Administrator of USCI and CPER since April 1, 2020.

Asset-based fees are calculated on a daily basis (accrued at 1/365 of the applicable percentage of total net assets on that day) and paid on a monthly basis. Total net assets are calculated by taking the current market value of each Trust Series’ total assets and subtracting any liabilities.

23

Expenses Paid or Accrued by USCI from Inception through December 31, 20172023 in Dollar Terms:

Expenses:

Amount in Dollar Terms

Amount Paid or Accrued to USCF(4):

$

46,324,131

Amount Paid or Accrued in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:

$

5,346,102

Other Amounts Paid or Accrued(5)(6):

$

7,849,406

Total Expenses Paid or Accrued:

$

59,519,639

Expenses Waived(4)(6):

$

(88,304)

Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived(5)(7):

$

59,431,335

Expenses: Amount in Dollar Terms 
Amount Paid or Accrued to USCF(3) : $32,178,706 
Amount Paid or Accrued in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions: $3,701,345 
Other Amounts Paid or Accrued(4)(5) : $4,848,823 
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued: $40,728,874 
Expenses Waived(3)(5) : $(88,304)
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived(3)(5) : $40,640,570 

(4)(3)Effective January 1, 2016, USCF permanently lowered the management fee to 0.80% (80 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for USCI. From May 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015, USCF, has contractually lowered the management fee to 0.80% (80 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for USCI.
(5)(4)Includes expenses relating to legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses and tax reporting fees.
(6)(5)USCF paid certain expenses on a discretionary basis typically borne by USCI where expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of USCI’s NAV, on an annualized basis, through March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, the expense waiver ended.

22 

Expenses Paid or Accrued by USCI from Inception through December 31, 20172023 as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets:

Expenses:

Amount as a Percentage
of Average 

Expenses:

Daily Net Assets

Amount Paid or Accrued to USCF(6)(7):

0.84% annualized

0.86% annualized

Amount Paid or Accrued in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:

0.10% annualized

Other Amounts Paid or Accrued(7)(8)(9):

0.14% annualized

0.13% annualized

Total Expenses Paid or Accrued:

1.08% annualized

1.09% annualized

Expenses Waived(6)(8)(7)(9)::

0.00% annualized

(9)(8)

Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived(6)(8)(7)(10)::

1.08% annualized

1.09% annualized

(7)(6)Effective January 1, 2016, USCF permanently lowered the management fee to 0.80% (80 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for USCI. From May 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015, USCF contractually lowered the management fee to 0.80% (80 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for USCI.
(8)(7)Includes expenses relating to legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses and tax reporting fees.
(9)(8)USCF paid certain expenses on a discretionary basis typically borne by USCI where expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of USCI’s NAV, on an annualized basis, through March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, the discretionary expense waiver ended.
(10)(9)Represents less than 0.005%.

Other Fees.Fees. USCI also pays the fees and expenses associated with its audit expenses, professional fees, and tax accounting and reporting requirements. These fees were approximately $590,000$369,900 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2023. In addition, USCI is responsible for paying its portion of the directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for USCI, the other Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. In addition, as of July 8, 2011, USCI became responsible for paying the fees and expenses of the independent directors who also serve as audit committee members of USCI, the other Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. USCI shares the fees and expenses on a pro rata basis with the other Trust Series and each Related Public Fund, as described above, based on the relative assets of each fund computed on a daily basis. These fees and expenses for the year ended December 31, 20172023 were $536,375approximately $1,210,000 for the Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. USCI’s portion of such fees and expenses was $69,558.$81,283.

24

Expenses Paid or Accrued by CPER from Inception through December 31, 20172023 in Dollar Terms:

Expenses:

    

Amount in Dollar Terms

Amount Paid or Accrued to USCF(11):

$

4,171,476

Amount Paid or Accrued in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:

$

189,323

Other Amounts Paid or Accrued(12)(13):

$

2,223,358

Total Expenses Paid or Accrued:

$

6,584,157

Expenses Waived(11)(12):

$

(669,393)

Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived(11)(12):

$

5,914,764

Expenses: Amount in Dollar Terms 
Amount Paid or Accrued to USCF(10) : $157,370 
Amount Paid or Accrued in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions: $11,981 
Other Amounts Paid or Accrued(11)(12) : $456,155 
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued: $625,506 
Expenses Waived(10)(11) : $(428,989)
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived(10)(11) : $196,517 

(11)(10)Effective January 1, 2016, USCF permanently lowered the management fee to 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for CPER. From May 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015, USCF contractually lowered the management fee to 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for CPER. From May 29, 2012 through April 30, 2014, USCF waived the management fee paid by CPER on a discretionary basis from 0.95% (95 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets to 0.65% per annum of average daily total net assets.
(12)(11)USCF paid certain expenses on a discretionary basis typically borne by CPER where expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of CPER’s NAV, on an annualized basis. USCF has no obligation to continue such payments into subsequent periods.
(13)(12)Includes expenses relating to legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses and tax reporting fees.

23 

Expenses Paid or Accrued by CPER from Inception through December 31, 20172023 as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets:

Expenses:

Amount as a Percentage

Expenses:

of Average Daily Net Assets

Amount Paid or Accrued to USCF(13)(14):

0.65% annualized

0.67% annualized

Amount Paid or Accrued in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:

0.03% annualized

0.05% annualized

Other Amounts Paid or Accrued(14)(15)(16):

0.35% annualized

1.93% annualized

Total Expenses Paid or Accrued:

1.03% annualized

2.65% annualized

Expenses Waived(13)(15)(14)(16):

(0.10%) annualized

(1.82)% annualized

(8)

Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived(13)(15)(14)(16):

0.92% annualized

0.83% annualized

(14)(13)Effective January 1, 2016, USCF permanently lowered the management fee to 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for CPER. From May 1, 2014 and through December 31, 2015, USCF contractually lowered the management fee to 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for CPER. From May 29, 2012 through April 30, 2014, USCF waived the management fee paid by CPER on a discretionary basis from 0.95% (95 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets to 0.65% per annum of average daily total net assets.
(15)(14)Includes expenses relating to legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses and tax reporting fees.
(16)(15)USCF paid certain expenses on a discretionary basis typically borne by CPER where expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of CPER’s NAV, on an annualized basis. USCF has no obligation to continue such payments into subsequent periods.

Other Fees.Fees. CPER also pays the fees and expenses associated with its audit expenses, professional fees, and tax accounting and reporting requirements. These fees were approximately $46,000$431,500 for the periodyear ended December 31, 2017.2023. In addition, CPER is responsible for paying its portion of the directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for CPER, the other Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. In addition, as of July 8, 2011, CPER became responsible for paying the fees and expenses of the independent directors who also serve as audit committee members of CPER, the other Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. CPER shares the fees and expenses on a pro rata basis with the other Trust Series and with each Related Public Fund, as described above, based on the relative assets of each fund computed on a daily basis. These fees and expenses for the year ended December 31, 20172023 were $536,375approximately $1,210,000 for the Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. CPER’s portion of such fees and expenses was $1,823. 

$76,810.

Expenses Paid or Accrued by USAG from Inception through December 31, 2017 in Dollar Terms:

Expenses: Amount in Dollar Terms 
Amount Paid or Accrued to USCF(16) : $92,212 
Amount Paid or Accrued in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions: $13,844 
Other Amounts Paid or Accrued(17)(18) : $390,636 
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued: $496,692 
Expenses Waived(16)(18) : $(378,986)
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived(16)(18) : $117,706 

(16)Effective January 1, 2016, USCF permanently lowered the management fee to 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for USAG. From May 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015, USCF contractually lowered the management fee to 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for USAG. From May 29, 2012 through April 30, 2014, USCF waived the management fee paid by USAG on a discretionary basis from 0.95% (95 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets to 0.80% (80 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets.
(17)Includes expenses relating to legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses and tax reporting fees.
(18)USCF paid certain expenses on a discretionary basis typically borne by USAG where expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of USAG’s NAV, on an annualized basis. USCF has no obligation to continue such payments into subsequent periods.

Expenses Paid or Accrued by USAG from Inception through December 31, 2017 as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets:

Expenses:Amount as a Percentage
of Average Daily Net Assets
Amount Paid or Accrued to USCF(19) :0.72% annualized
Amount Paid or Accrued in Portfolio Brokerage Commissions:0.11% annualized
Other Amounts Paid or Accrued(20)(21) :3.02% annualized
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued:3.85% annualized
Expenses Waived(19)(21) :(2.94)% annualized
Total Expenses Paid or Accrued Including Expenses Waived(19)(21) :0.91% annualized

(19)Effective January 1, 2016, USCF permanently lowered the management fee to 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for USAG. From May 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015, USCF contractually lowered the management fee to 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for USAG. From May 29, 2012 through April 30, 2014, USCF waived the management fee paid by USAG on a discretionary basis from 0.95% (95 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets to 0.80% (80 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets.
(20)Includes expenses relating to legal fees, auditing fees, printing expenses and tax reporting fees.
(21)USCF paid certain expenses typically borne by USAG on a discretionary basis where expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of USAG’s NAV, on an annualized basis. USCF has no obligation to continue such payments into subsequent periods.

Other Fees. USAG also pays the fees and expenses associated with its audit expenses, tax accounting and reporting requirements. These fees were approximately $45,000 for the period ended December 31, 2017. In addition, USAG is responsible for paying its portion of the directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for USAG, the other Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. In addition, as of July 8, 2011, USAG became responsible for paying the fees and expenses of the independent directors who also serve as audit committee members of USAG, the other Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. USAG shares the fees and expenses on a pro rata basis with the other Trust Series and with each Related Public Fund, as described above, based on the relative assets of each fund computed on a daily basis. These fees and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $536,375 for the Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. USAG’s portion of such fees and expenses was $1,144.

24 

Form of Shares

Registered Form.Form. Shares are issued in registered form in accordance with the Trust Agreement. The Administrator has been appointed registrar and transfer agent for the purpose of transferring shares in certificated form. The Administrator keeps a record of all shareholders and holders of the shares in certificated form in the registry. The beneficial interests in such shares are held in book-entry form through participants and/or accountholders in the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”).

Book Entry. Individual certificates are not issued for the shares. Instead, shares are represented by one or more global certificates, which are deposited by the Administrator with DTC and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC. The global certificates

25

evidence all of the shares outstanding at any time. Shareholders are limited to: (1) participants in DTC such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies (“DTC Participants”), (2) those who maintain, either directly or indirectly, a custodial relationship with a DTC Participant (“Indirect Participants”), and (3) those banks, brokers, dealers, trust companies and others who hold interests in the shares through DTC Participants or Indirect Participants, in each case who satisfy the requirements for transfers of shares. DTC Participants acting on behalf of investors holding shares through such participants’ accounts in DTC will follow the delivery practice applicable to securities eligible for DTC’s Same-Day Funds Settlement System. Shares are credited to DTC Participants’ securities accounts following confirmation of receipt of payment.

DTC.

DTC. DTC has advised the Trust Series as follows: ItDTC is a limited purpose trust company organized under the laws of the State of New York and is a member of the Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code and a “clearing agency” registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act. DTC holds securities for DTC Participants and facilitates the clearance and settlement of transactions between DTC Participants through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of DTC Participants.

Inter-Series Limitation on Liability

Because the Trust was established as a Delaware Statutory Trust,statutory trust, each Trust Series will be operated so that it will be liable only for obligations attributable to such series and will not be liable for obligations of any other series or affected by losses of any other series. If any creditor or shareholder of any particular series asserts against the series a valid claim with respect to its indebtedness or shares, the creditor or shareholder will only be able to obtain recovery from the assets of that series and not from the assets of any other series or the Trust generally. The assets of each Trust Series will include only those funds and other assets that are paid to, held by or distributed to the series on account of and for the benefit of that series, including, without limitation, amounts delivered to the Trust for the purchase of shares in a series. This limitation on liability is referred to as the Inter-Series Limitation on Liability. The Inter-Series Limitation on Liability is expressly provided for under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, which provides that if certain conditions (as set forth in Section 3804(a)) are met, then the debts of any particular series will be enforceable only against the assets of such series and not against the assets of any other series or the Trust generally. In furtherance of the Inter-Series Limitation on Liability, every party providing services to the Trust, any Trust Series or USCF on behalf of the Trust or any Trust Series, will acknowledge and consent in writing to the Inter-Series Limitation on Liability with respect to such party’s claims.

The existence of a Trustee should not be taken as an indication of any additional level of management or supervision over any Trust Series. To the greatest extent permissible under Delaware law, the Trustee acts in an entirely passive role, delegating all authority for the management and operation of each Trust Series and the Trust to USCF. The Trustee does not provide custodial services with respect to the assets of any Trust Series.

Calculating Per Share NAV

Each Trust Series’ per share NAV is calculated by:

Taking the current market value of its total assets;
Subtracting any liabilities; and
Dividing that total by the total number of outstanding shares.

The Administrator calculates the per share NAV of each Trust Series once each NYSE Arca trading day. The per share NAV for a normal trading day is released after 4:00 p.m. New York time. Trading during the core trading session on the NYSE Arca typically closes at 4:00 p.m. New York time. The Administrator uses the closing prices on the relevant Futures Exchanges of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts (determined at the earlier of the close of such exchange or 2:30 p.m. New York time) for the Futures Contracts traded on the Futures Exchanges, but calculates or determines the value of all other investments of a Trust Series (including Other Related Investments) using market quotations, if available, or other information customarily used to determine the fair value of such investments as of the earlier of the close of the NYSE Arca or 4:00 p.m. New York time, in accordance with the Administrative Agency Agreement among BBH&Co.,the Administrator, the Trust Series and USCF. “Other information” customarily used in determining fair value includes information consisting of market data in the relevant market supplied by one or more third parties including, without limitation, relevant rates, prices, yields, yield curves, volatilities, spreads, correlations or other market data in the relevant market; or information of the types described above from internal sources if that information is of the same type used by a Trust Series in the regular course of its business for the valuation of similar transactions. The information may include costs of funding, to the extent costs of funding are not and would not be a component of the other information being utilized. Third parties supplying quotations

26

or market data may include, without limitation, dealers in the relevant markets, end-users of the relevant product, information vendors, brokers and other sources of market information.


In addition, in order to provide updated information relating to each Trust Series for use by investors and market professionals, the NYSE Arca calculates and disseminates throughout the core trading session on each trading day an updated indicative fund value. The indicative fund value is calculated by using the prior day’s closing per share NAV of a Trust Series as a base and updating that value throughout the trading day to reflect changes in the most recently reported price level of the Applicable Index as reported by Bloomberg or other reporting service. The indicative fund value share basis disseminated during NYSE Arca core trading session hours should not be viewed as an actual real time update of the per share NAV, because the per share NAV is calculated only once at the end of each trading day based upon the relevant end of day values of each Trust Series’ investments.

The indicative fund value is disseminated on a per share basis every 15 seconds during regular NYSE Arca core trading session hours of 9:30 a.m. New York time to 4:00 p.m. New York time. The normal trading hours of the Futures Exchanges vary, with some Futures Exchanges ending their trading hours before the close of the core trading session on the NYSE Arca (for example, the normal trading hours of the NYMEX are 9:00 a.m. New York time to 2:30 p.m. New York time). When a Trust Series holds Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts from Futures Exchanges with different trading hours than the NYSE Arca, there will be a gap in time at the beginning and/or the end of each day during which such Trust Series’ shares are traded on the NYSE Arca, but real-time Futures Exchange trading prices for Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts traded on such Futures Exchanges are not available. During such gaps in time the indicative fund value will be calculated based on the end of day price of such Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts from Futures Exchanges immediately preceding trading session. In addition, Other Related Investments and Treasuries held by a Trust Series will be valued by the Administrator, using rates and points received from client-approved third party vendors (such as Reuters and WM Company) and advisor quotes. These investments will not be included in the indicative fund value.

The NYSE Arca disseminates the indicative fund value through the facilities of CTA/CQ High Speed Lines. In addition, the indicative fund value is published on the NYSE Arca’s website and is available through on-line information services such as Bloomberg and Reuters.

Dissemination of the indicative fund value provides additional information that is not otherwise available to the public and is useful to investors and market professionals in connection with the trading of the shares of a Trust Series on the NYSE Arca. Investors and market professionals are able throughout the trading day to compare the market price of a Trust Series and the indicative fund value. If the market price of shares of a Trust Series diverges significantly from the indicative fund value, market professionals will have an incentive to execute arbitrage trades. For example, if a Trust Series appears to be trading at a discount compared to the indicative fund value, a market professional could buy shares of such Trust Series on the NYSE Arca and sell short Futures Contracts. Such arbitrage trades can tighten the tracking between the market price of such Trust Series and the indicative fund value and thus can be beneficial to all market participants.

In addition, other Futures Contracts, Other Related Investments and Treasuries held by a Trust Series are valued by the Administrator, using rates and points received from client-approved third party vendors (such as Reuters and WM Company) and advisor quotes. These investments are not included in the indicative value. The indicative fund value is based on the prior day’s per share NAV and moves up and down solely according to changes in the price of the Applicable Index as reported on Bloomberg or another reporting service.

The Trust reserves the right to adjust the share price of USCI or CPER in the future to maintain convenient trading ranges for investors. Any adjustments would be accomplished through stock splits or reverse stock splits. Such splits would decrease (in the case of a split) or increase (in the case of a reverse split) the proportionate NAV per share, but would have no effect on the net assets of the relevant Trust Series or the proportionate voting rights of shareholders.

Creation and Redemption of Shares

Each Trust Series creates and redeems shares from time to time, but only in one or more Creation Baskets or Redemption Baskets. The creation and redemption of baskets are only made in exchange for delivery to a Trust Series or the distribution by a Trust Series of the amount of Treasuries and/or cash represented by the baskets being created or redeemed, the amount of which is equal to the combined NAV of the number of shares included in the baskets being created or redeemed determined as of 4:00 p.m. New York time on the day the order to create or redeem baskets is properly received.

27

Authorized Participants are the only persons that may place orders to create and redeem baskets. Authorized Participants must be (1) either registered broker-dealers or other securities market participants, such as banks and other financial institutions, that are not required to register as broker-dealers to engage in securities transactions as described below, and (2) DTC Participants. To become an Authorized Participant, a person must enter into an Authorized Participant Agreement with USCF on behalf of a Trust Series (each such agreement, an “Authorized Participant Agreement”). The Authorized Participant Agreement provides the procedures for the creation and redemption of baskets and for the delivery of the Treasuries and/or cash required for such creations and redemptions. The Authorized Participant Agreement and the related procedures attached thereto may be amended by USCF, without the consent of any shareholder or Authorized Participant. Effective January 1, 2016, USCF permanently lowered the management fee to 0.80% (80 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for USCI and 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for both CPER and USAG, respectively.CPER. Authorized Participants pay each Trust Series a $350 transaction fee for each order placedthey place to create one or more Creation Baskets or to redeem one or more Redemption Baskets. The transaction fee may be reduced, increased or otherwise changed by USCF. Authorized Participants who make deposits with a Trust Series in exchange for baskets receive no fees, commissions or other form of compensation or inducement of any kind from either the Trust or USCF, and no such person will have any obligation or responsibility to the Trust or USCF to effect any sale or resale of shares. As of December 31, 2017, 112023, 10 Authorized Participants had entered into agreements with USCF on behalf of USCI. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, USCI issued 259 Creation Baskets and redeemed 10740 Redemption Baskets. As of December 31, 2017, 112023, 10 Authorized Participants had entered into agreements with USCF on behalf of CPER. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, CPER issued 1456 Creation Baskets and redeemed 994 Redemption Baskets. As of December 31, 2017, 11 Authorized Participants had entered into agreements with USCF on behalf of USAG. During the year ended December 31, 2017, USAG did not issue any Creation Baskets and did not redeem any Redemption Baskets.


Certain Authorized Participants are expected to be capable of participating directly in the applicable physical commodity and the Applicable Interest markets. Some Authorized Participants or their affiliates may from time to time buy or sell applicable commodities or Applicable Interests and may profit in these instances. USCF believes that the size and operation of the applicable commodities market make it unlikely that Authorized Participants’ direct activities in the applicable commodities or securities markets will significantly affect the price of applicable commodities, Applicable Interests, or the price of shares.

Each Authorized Participant is required to be registered as a broker-dealer under the Exchange Act and is a member in good standing with FINRA, or exempt from being or otherwise not required to be registered as a broker-dealer or a member of FINRA, and qualified to act as a broker or dealer in the states or other jurisdictions where the nature of its business so requires. Certain Authorized Participants may also be regulated under federal and state banking laws and regulations. Each Authorized Participant has its own set of rules and procedures, internal controls and information barriers as it determines is appropriate in light of its own regulatory regime.

Under the Authorized Participant Agreement, USCF, and the Trust under limited circumstances, have agreed to indemnify the Authorized Participants against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and to contribute to the payments the Authorized Participants may be required to make in respect of those liabilities.

The following description of the procedures for the creation and redemption of baskets is only a summary and an investor should refer to the relevant provisions of the Trust Agreement and the form of Authorized Participant Agreement for more detail, each of which is incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K.

Creation Procedures

On any business day, an Authorized Participant may place an order with the Marketing Agent to create one or more baskets. For purposes of processing purchase and redemption orders, a “business day” means any day other than a day when the NYSE Arca, the New York Stock Exchange, or any of the Futures Exchanges upon which an Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract is traded is closed for regular trading. Purchase orders must be placed by 10:30 a.m. New York time or the close of regular trading on the NYSE Arca, whichever is earlier. The day on which the Marketing Agent receives a valid purchase order is referred to as the purchase order date.

By placing a purchase order, an Authorized Participant agrees to deposit Treasuries, cash or a combination of Treasuries and cash with the Trust, as described below. Prior to the delivery of baskets for a purchase order, the Authorized Participant must also have wired to the Custodian the non-refundable transaction fee due for the purchase order. Authorized Participants may not withdraw a creationCreation Basket request, except as otherwise set forth in the procedures in the Authorized Participant Agreement.

The manner by which creations are made is dictated by the terms of the Authorized Participant Agreement. By placing a purchase order, an Authorized Participant agrees to (1) deposit Treasuries, cash, or a combination of Treasuries and cash with the Custodian, and (2) if required by USCF in its sole discretion, enter into or arrange for a block trade, an exchange for physical or exchange for swap, or any other OTC energy transaction (through itself or a designated acceptable broker) with a Trust Series for the purchase of a number and type of futures contracts at the closing settlement price for such contracts on the purchase order date. If an Authorized Participant fails

28

to consummate (1) and (2), the order shall be cancelled. The number and typetypes of contracts specified shall be determined by USCF, in its sole discretion, to meet a Trust Series’ investment objective and shall be purchased as a result of the Authorized Participant’s purchase of shares.

Determination of Required Deposits

The total deposit required to create each basketCreation Basket (“Creation Basket Deposit”) is the amount of Treasuries and/or cash that is in the same proportion to the total assets of a Trust Series (net of estimated accrued but unpaid fees, expenses and other liabilities) on the purchase order date as the number of shares to be created under the purchase order is in proportion to the total number of shares outstanding on the purchase order dates.date. USCF determines, directly in its sole discretion or in consultation with the Administrator, the requirements for Treasuries and cash, including the remaining maturities of the Treasuries and proportions of Treasuries and cash that may be included in deposits to create baskets. The Marketing Agent will publish an estimate of the Creation Basket Deposit requirements at the beginning of each business day. The amount of cash deposit required is the difference between the aggregate market value of the Treasuries required to be included in a Creation Basket Deposit as of 4:00 p.m. New York time on the date the order to purchase is properly received and the total required deposit.

Delivery of Required Deposits

An Authorized Participant who places a purchase order is responsible for transferring to a Trust Series’ account with the Custodian the required amount of Treasuries and/or cash by noon New York time on the second business day following the purchase order date. Upon receipt of the deposit amount, the Administrator directs DTC to credit the number of baskets ordered to the Authorized Participant’s DTC account on the second business day following the purchase order date.dates. The expense and risk of delivery and ownership of Treasuries until such Treasuries have been received by the Custodian on behalf of each Trust Series shall be borne solely by the Authorized Participant.


Because orders to purchase baskets must be placed by 10:30 a.m., New York time, but the total payment required to create a basket during the continuous offering period will not be determined until 4:00 p.m., New York time, on the date the purchase order is received, Authorized Participants will not know the total amount of the payment required to create a basket at the time they submit an irrevocable purchase order for the basket. A Trust Series’ per share NAV and the total amount of the payment required to create a basket could rise or fall substantially between the time an irrevocable purchase order is submitted and the time the amount of the purchase price in respect thereof is determined.

Rejection of Purchase Orders

USCF acting by itself or through the Marketing Agent shall have the absolute right, but shall have no obligation, to reject any purchase order or Creation Basket Deposit if USCF determines that:

the purchase order or Creation Basket Deposit is not in proper form;
it would not be in the best interest of the shareholders of a Trust Series;
due to position limits or otherwise, investment alternatives that will enable a Trust Series to meet its investment objective are not available to such Trust Series at that time;
the acceptance of the purchase order or the Creation Basket Deposit would have adverse tax consequences to a Trust Series or its shareholders;
the acceptance or receipt of which would, in the opinion of counsel to USCF, be unlawful; or
circumstances outside the control of USCF, the Marketing Agent or the Custodian make it, for all practical purposes, not feasible to process creations of Creation Baskets (including if USCF determines that the investments available to a Trust Series at that time will not enable it to meet its investment objective).

None of USCF, the Marketing Agent or the Custodian will be liable for the rejection of any purchase order or Creation Basket Deposit.

Redemption Procedures

The procedures by which an Authorized Participant can redeem one or more baskets mirror the procedures for the creation of baskets. On any business day, an Authorized Participant may place an order with the Marketing Agent to redeem one or more baskets. Redemption orders must be placed by 10:30 a.m. New York time or the close of regular trading on the NYSE Arca, whichever is earlier. A redemption order so received will be effective on the date it is received in satisfactory form by the Marketing Agent (“Redemption

29

Order Date”). The redemption procedures allow Authorized Participants to redeem baskets and do not entitle an individual shareholder to redeem any shares in an amount less than a Redemption Basket, or to redeem baskets other than through an Authorized Participant.

By placing a redemption order, an Authorized Participant agrees to deliver the baskets to be redeemed through DTC’s book-entry system to a Trust Series, as described below. Prior to the delivery of the redemption distribution for a redemption order, the Authorized Participant must also have wired to USCF’s account at the Custodian the non-refundable transaction fee due for the redemption order. An Authorized Participant may not withdraw a redemption order, except as otherwise set forth in the procedures in the Authorized Participant Agreement.

The manner by which redemptions are made is dictated by the terms of the Authorized Participant Agreement. By placing a redemption order, an Authorized Participant agrees to (1) deliver the Redemption Basket to be redeemed through DTC’s book-entry system to a Trust Series’ account with the Custodian not later than 3:00 p.m. New York time on the second business day following the effective date of the redemption order (“Redemption Distribution Date”), and (2) if required by USCF in its sole discretion, enter into or arrange for a block trade, an exchange for physical or exchange for swap, or any other OTC transaction (through itself or a designated acceptable broker) with a Trust Series for the sale of a number and type of futures contracts at the closing settlement price for such contracts on the Redemption Order Date. If an Authorized Participant fails to consummate (1) and (2) above, the order shall be cancelled. The number and type of contracts specified shall be determined by USCF, in its sole discretion, to meet a Trust Series’ investment objective and shall be sold as a result of the Authorized Participant’s sale of shares.

Determination of Redemption Distribution

The redemption distribution from a Trust Series consists of a transfer to the redeeming Authorized Participant of an amount of Treasuries and/or cash that is in the same proportion to the total assets of such Trust Series (net of estimated accrued but unpaid fees, expenses and other liabilities) on the date the order to redeem is properly received as the number of shares to be redeemed under the redemption order is in proportion to the total number of shares outstanding on the date the order is received. USCF, directly or in consultation with the Administrator, determines the requirements for Treasuries and cash, including the remaining maturities of the Treasuries and proportions of Treasuries and cash that may be included in distributions to redeem baskets. The Marketing Agent will publish an estimate of the redemption distribution per basket as of the beginning of each business day.


Delivery of Redemption Distribution

The redemption distribution due from a Trust Series will be delivered to the Authorized Participant on the second business day following the redemption order date if, by 3:00 p.m., New York time on such second business day, such Trust Series’ DTC account has been credited with the baskets to be redeemed. If such Trust Series’ DTC account has not been credited with all of the baskets to be redeemed by such time, the redemption distribution will be delivered to the extent of whole baskets received. Any remainder of the redemption distribution will be delivered on the next business day to the extent of remaining whole baskets received if USCF receives the fee applicable to the extension of the redemption distribution date which USCF may, from time to time, determine and the remaining baskets to be redeemed are credited to a Trust Series’ DTC account by 3:00 p.m., New York time on such next business day. Any further outstanding amount of the redemption order shall be cancelled. Pursuant to information from USCF, the Custodian will also be authorized to deliver the redemption distribution notwithstanding that the baskets to be redeemed are not credited to a Trust Series’ DTC account by 3:00 p.m., New York time on the second business day following the redemption order date if the Authorized Participant has collateralized its obligation to deliver the baskets through DTC’s book-entry system on such terms as USCF may from time to time determine.

Suspension or Rejection of Redemption Orders

USCF may, in its discretion, suspend the right of redemption, or postpone the redemption settlement date, (1) for any period during which the NYSE Arca or any of the Futures Exchanges upon which an Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract is traded is closed other than customary weekend or holiday closings, or trading on the NYSE Arca or the Futures Exchanges is suspended or restricted, (2) for any period during which an emergency exists as a result of which delivery, disposal or evaluation of Treasuries is not reasonably practicable, or (3) for such other period as USCF determines to be necessary for the protection of the shareholders. For example, USCF may determine that it is necessary to suspend redemptions to allow for the orderly liquidation of a Trust Series’ assets at an appropriate value to fund a redemption. If USCF has difficulty liquidating a Trust Series’ positions,e.g., because of a market disruption event in the futures markets or an unanticipated delay in the liquidation of a position in an over the counter contract, it may be appropriate to suspend redemptions until such time as such circumstances are rectified. None of USCF, the Marketing Agent, the

30

Administrator or the Custodian will be liable to any person or in any way for any loss or damages that may result from any such suspension or postponement.

Redemption orders must be made in whole baskets. USCF will reject a redemption order if the order is not in proper form, as described in the Authorized Participant Agreement, or the fulfillment of the order in the opinion of its counsel may be illegal under applicable laws and regulations, or if circumstances outside the control of USCF, the Marketing Agent or the Custodian make it for all practical purposes not feasible for the shares to be delivered under the Redemption Order. USCF may also reject a redemption order if the number of shares being redeemed would reduce the remaining outstanding shares to 100,000 shares (i.e.(i.e., two baskets) or less.less, unless USCF has reason to believe that the placer of the redemption order does in fact possess all the outstanding shares and can deliver them.

Creation and Redemption Transaction Fee

To compensate each Trust Series for its expenses in connection with the creation and redemption of baskets, an Authorized Participant is required to pay a transaction fee to each Trust Series per order to create or redeem baskets, regardless of the number of baskets in such order. Authorized Participants pay each Trust Series a $350 transaction fee for each order placed to create one or more Creation Baskets or to redeem one or more Redemption Baskets. The transaction fee may be reduced, increased or otherwise changed by USCF. USCF shall notify DTC of any change in the transaction fee and will not implement any increase in the fee for the redemption of baskets until 30thirty (30) days after the date of the notice.

Tax Responsibility

Authorized Participants are responsible for any transfer tax, sales or use tax, stamp tax, recording tax, value added tax or similar tax or governmental charge applicable to the creation or redemption of baskets, regardless of whether or not such tax or charge is imposed directly on the Authorized Participant, and agree to indemnify USCF and each Trust Series if they are required by law to pay any such tax, together with any applicable penalties, additions to tax and interest thereon.

Secondary Market Transactions

As noted, each Trust Series creates and redeems shares from time to time, but only in one or more Creation Baskets or Redemption Baskets. The creation and redemption of baskets are only made in exchange for delivery to a Trust Series or the distribution by a Trust Series of the amount of Treasuries and/or cash equal to the aggregate NAV of the number of shares included in the baskets being created or redeemed determined on the day the order to create or redeem baskets is properly received.

As discussed above, Authorized Participants are the only persons that may place orders to create and redeem baskets. Authorized Participants must be registered broker-dealers or other securities market participants, such as banks and other financial institutions that are not required to register as broker-dealers to engage in securities transactions. An Authorized Participant is under no obligation to create or redeem baskets, and an Authorized Participant is under no obligation to offer to the public shares of any baskets it does create. Authorized Participants that do offer to the public shares from the baskets they create will do so at per-share offering prices that are expected to reflect, among other factors, the trading price of the shares on the NYSE Arca, the NAV of a Trust Series’ shares at the time the Authorized Participant purchased the Creation Baskets, the per share NAV of the shares at the time of the offer of the shares to the public, the supply of and demand for shares at the time of sale, and the liquidity of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract market and the market for Other Related Investments. Baskets are generally redeemed when the price per share is at a discount to the per share NAV.


Shares initially comprising the same basket but offered by Authorized Participants to the public at different times may have different offering prices. An order for one or more baskets may be placed by an Authorized Participant on behalf of multiple clients. Authorized Participants who make deposits with a Trust Series in exchange for baskets receive no fees, commissions or other forms of compensation or inducement of any kind from either a Trust Series or USCF and no such person has any obligation or responsibility to USCF or a Trust Series to effect any sale or resale of shares. Shares trade in the secondary market on the NYSE Arca. Shares may trade in the secondary market at prices that are lower or higher relative to their per share NAV. The amount of the discount or premium in the trading price relative to the per share NAV may be influenced by various factors, including the number of investors who seek to purchase or sell shares in the secondary market and the liquidity of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract market and the market for Other Related Investments. While

In addition, while the Trust Series’ shares trade during the core trading session on the NYSE Arca until 4:00 p.m. New York time, liquidity in the market for Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and Other Related Investments may be reduced after

31

the close of the Futures Exchanges upon which the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts are traded. As a result, during this time, trading spreads, and the resulting premium or discount, on the shares may widen.

Who is the Trustee?

The sole Trustee of the Trust is Wilmington Trust, Company, a Delaware trust companyN.A. (the “Trustee”) serves as the Trust’s corporate trustee as required under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (“DSTA”). The Trustee’s principal offices are located at 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001. USCF pays the Trustee $3,300 annually for its services to the Trust.

The Trustee is unaffiliated with USCF.the sole trustee of the Trust. The Trustee’srights and duties of the Trustee and liabilitiesUSCF with respect to the offering of the shares and the management of the Trust Series and each Trust Seriesthe shareholders are limited to its express obligations undergoverned by the provisions of the DSTA and by the Trust Agreement.

The Trustee will accept service of legal process on the Trust in the State of Delaware and will make certain filings under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act.DSTA. The Trustee does not owe any other duties to the Trust, USCF or the shareholders. shareholders of the Trust Series. The Trustee’s principal offices are located at 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890. The Trustee is unaffiliated with USCF.

The Trustee is permitted to resign upon at least sixty (60) days’ notice to USCF. If nothe Trust, provided, that any such resignation will not be effective until a successor trustee has beenTrustee is appointed by USCF within such sixty-day period, the Trustee may, at the expense of the Trust, petition a court to appoint a successor. The Trustee is entitled to reasonable compensation for its services from USCF or an affiliate of USCF (including the Trust), and is indemnified by USCF against any expenses it incurs relating to or arising out of the formation, operation or termination of the Trust, or any action or inaction of the Trustee under the Trust Agreement, except to the extent that such expenses result from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the Trustee.USCF. USCF has the discretion to replace the Trustee.

Only the assets of the Trust and USCF are subject to issuer liability under the federal securities laws for the information contained in this prospectus and under federal securities laws with respect to the issuance and sale of the shares. Under such laws, neither the Trustee, either in its capacity as Trustee or in its individual capacity, nor any director, officer or controlling person of the Trustee is, or has any liability as, the issuer or a director, officer or controlling person of the issuer of the shares. The Trustee’s liability in connection with the issuance and sale of the shares is limited solely to the express obligations of the Trustee set forth in the Trust Agreement.

Under the Trust Agreement, the TrusteeUSCF has delegated to USCF the exclusive management and control of all aspects of the business of the Trust and the Trust Series.Trust’s business. The Trustee has no duty or liability to supervise or monitor the performance of USCF, nor doeswill the Trustee have any liability for the acts or omissions of USCF.

The shareholders have no voice in the day to day management of the business and operations of the Trust Series and the Trust, other than certain limited voting rights as set forth in the Trust Agreement. In the course of its management of the business and affairs of the Trust Series and the Trust, USCF may, in its sole and absolute discretion, appoint an affiliate or affiliates of USCF as additional sponsors and retain such persons, including affiliates of USCF, as it deems necessary to effectuate and carry out the purposes, business and objectives of the Trust.

Because the Trustee has no authority over the operation of the Trust,Trust’s operations, the Trustee itself is not registered in any capacity with the CFTC.

Investments

Use of Proceeds

USCF applies substantially allcauses the Trust Series to transfer the proceeds of athe sale of Creation Baskets to the Custodian or another custodian for use in trading activities. USCF will invest each Trust Series’ assets in Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and Other Related Investments, short-term Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents. When a Trust Series purchases Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and certain Other Related Investments that are exchange-traded, athe Trust Series is required to deposit with the FCM on behalf of the exchange a portion of the value of the contract or other interest as security to ensure payment for the obligation under the Applicable Interests at maturity. However, from time to time, the percentage of assets committed as margin may be substantially more, or less, than such range. This deposit is known as initial margin. Counterparties in transactions in OTC Applicable Interests generally impose similar collateral requirements on a Trust Series. USCF invests a Trust Series’ assets that remain after margin and collateral is posted in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents. Subject to these margin and collateral requirements, USCF has sole authority to determine the percentage of assets that will be:

held as margin or collateral with FCMs or other custodians;
used for other investments; and
held in bank accounts to pay current obligations and as reserves.

In general, aAn FCM, counterparty, government agency or commodity exchange could increase margin or collateral requirements applicable to each Trust Series posts betweento hold trading positions at any time. The percentage of assets committed as margin may be substantially more, or less, than 5% to 30% of the notional amount of an Applicable Interest as initial margin when entering into such Applicable Interest.range described above. Ongoing margin and collateral payments will generally be required for both exchange-traded and OTC Applicable Interests based on changes in the value of the Applicable Interests. Furthermore, ongoing collateral requirements with respect to OTC Applicable Interests are negotiated by the parties, and may be affected by overall market volatility, volatility of the underlying commodity or index, the ability of the counterparty to hedge its exposure under the Applicable Interest, and each party’s

32

creditworthiness. Margin is merely a security deposit and has no bearing on the profit or loss potential for any positions held. In light of the differing requirements for initial payments under exchange-traded and OTC Applicable Interests and the fluctuating nature of ongoing margin and collateral payments, it is not possible to estimate what portion of a Trust Series’ assets will be posted as margin or collateral at any given time. The Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents held by a Trust Series constitute reserves that are available to meet ongoing margin and collateral requirements. All interest income is used for a Trust Series’ benefit.

An FCM, counterparty, government agency or commodity exchange could increase margin or collateral requirements applicable to a Trust Series to hold trading positions at any time. Moreover, margin is merely a security deposit and has no bearing on the profit or loss potential for any positions held.

Each Trust Series’ assets posted as margin for Futures Contracts will be held in segregated accounts pursuant to CEA and CFTC regulations. Collateral posted in connection with OTC contracts held with a Trust Series’ FCM will be similarly segregated and if held with other counterparties will be segregated pursuant to a contract between such Trust Series and its counterparties.


If a Trust Series enters into a swap agreement, it must post both collateral and independent amounts to its swap counterparty(ies). The amount of collateral The Trust Series posts changes according to the amounts owed by the Trust Series to its counterparty on a given swap transaction, while independent amounts are fixed amounts posted by the Trust Series at the start of a swap transaction. Collateral and independent amounts posted to swap counterparties will be held by a third party custodian.

The Commodity Interest Markets

General

The CEA governs the regulation of commodity interest transactions, markets and intermediaries. The CEA provides for varying degrees of regulation of commodity interest transactions depending upon: (1) the type of instrument being traded (e.g.(e.g., contracts for future delivery, forwards, options, swaps or spot contracts), (2) the type of commodity underlying the instrument (distinctions are made between instruments based on agricultural commodities, energy and metals commodities and financial commodities), (3) the nature of the parties to the transaction (e.g., retail or eligible contract participant), (4) whether the transaction is entered into on a principal-to-principal or intermediated basis, (5) the type of market on which the transaction occurs, and (6) whether the transaction is subject to clearing through a clearing organization.

The offer and sale of shares of each Trust Series as well as shares of each Related Public Fund, is registered under the Securities Act. Each Trust Series and the Related Public Funds are subject to the requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations adopted thereunder as administered by the SEC. The Firm’sFirms’ participation in the distribution of shares areis regulated as described above, as well as by the self-regulatory association, FINRA.

Futures Contracts

A futures contract is a standardized contract traded on, or subject to the rules of, an exchange that calls for the future delivery of a specified quantity and type of a commodity at a specified time and place. Futures contracts are traded on a wide variety of commodities, including agricultural products, bonds, stock indices, interest rates, currencies, energy and metals. The size and terms of futures contracts on a particular commodity are identical and are not subject to any negotiation, other than with respect to price and the number of contracts traded between the buyer and seller.

The contractual obligations of a buyer or seller may generally be satisfied by taking or making physical delivery of the underlying commodity or by making an offsetting sale or purchase of an identical futures contract on the same or linked exchange before the designated date of delivery. The difference between the price at which the futures contract is purchased or sold and the price paid for the offsetting sale or purchase, after allowance for brokerage commissions, constitutes the profit or loss to the trader. Some futures contracts, such as stock index contracts, settle in cash (reflecting the difference between the contract purchase/sale price and the contract settlement price) rather than by delivery of the underlying commodity.

In market terminology, a trader who purchases a futures contract is long in the market and a trader who sells a futures contract is short in the market. Before a trader closes out his long or short position by an offsetting sale or purchase, his outstanding contracts are known as open trades or open positions. The aggregate amount of open positions held by traders in a particular contract is referred to as the open interest in such contract.

Forward Contracts

A forward contract is a contractual obligation to purchase or sell a specified quantity of a commodity at or before a specified date in the future at a specified price and, therefore, is economically similar to a futures contract. Unlike futures contracts, however, forward

33

contracts are typically traded in the OTC markets and are not standardized contracts. Forward contracts for a given commodity are generally available for various amounts and maturities and are subject to individual negotiation between the parties involved. Moreover, generally there is no direct means of offsetting or closing out a forward contract by taking an offsetting position as one would a futures contract on a U.S. exchange. If a trader desires to close out a forward contract position, he generally will establish an opposite position in the contract but will settle and recognize the profit or loss on both positions simultaneously on the delivery date. Thus, unlike in the futures contract market where a trader who has offset positions will recognize profit or loss immediately, in the forward market a trader with a position that has been offset at a profit will generally not receive such profit until the delivery date, and likewise a trader with a position that has been offset at a loss will generally not have to pay money until the delivery date. Nevertheless, in some instances forward contracts now provide a right of offset or cash settlement as an alternative to making or taking delivery of the underlying commodity.

In general, the CFTC does not regulate the interbank and forward foreign currency markets with respect to transactions in contracts between certain sophisticated counterparties such as a Trust Series or between certain regulated institutions and retail investors. Although U.S. banks are regulated in various ways by the Federal Reserve Board, the Comptroller of the Currency and other U.S. federal and state banking officials, banking authorities do not regulate the forward markets to the same extent that the swap markets are regulated by the CFTC and SEC.

Regulation exempts both foreign exchange swaps and foreign exchange forwards from the definition of “swap” and, by extension, certain regulatory requirements applicable to swaps (such as clearing and margin). The exemption does not extend to other foreign exchange derivatives, such as foreign exchange options, currency swaps, and non-deliverable forwards.


While the U.S. government does not currently impose any restrictions on the movements of currencies, it could choose to do so. The imposition or relaxation of exchange controls in various jurisdictions could significantly affect the market for that and other jurisdictions’ currencies. Trading in the interbank market also exposes the Trust Series to a risk of default since failure of a bank with which a Trust Series had entered into a forward contract would likely result in a default and thus possibly substantial losses to the Trust Series.

Options on Futures Contracts

Options on futures contracts are standardized contracts traded on an exchange. An option on a futures contract gives the buyer of the option the right, but not the obligation, to take a position at a specified price (the striking, strike, or exercise price) in the underlying futures contract or underlying interest. The buyer of a call option acquires the right, but not the obligation, to purchase or take a long position in the underlying interest, and the buyer of a put option acquires the right, but not the obligation, to sell or take a short position in the underlying interest.

The seller, or writer, of an option is obligated to take a position in the underlying interest at a specified price opposite to the option buyer if the option is exercised. The seller of a call option must stand ready to take a short position in the underlying interest at the strike price if the buyer should exercise the option. The seller of a put option, on the other hand, must stand ready to take a long position in the underlying interest at the strike price.

A call option is said to be in-the-money if the strike price is below current market levels and out-of-the-money if the strike price is above current market levels. Conversely, a put option is said to be in-the-money if the strike price is above the current market levels and out-of-the-money if the strike price is below current market levels.

Options have limited life spans, usually tied to the delivery or settlement date of the underlying interest. Some options, however, expire significantly in advance of such date. The purchase price of an option is referred to as its premium, which consists of its intrinsic value (which is related to the underlying market value) plus its time value. As an option nears its expiration date, the time value shrinks and the market and intrinsic values move into parity. An option that is out-of-the-money and not offset by the time it expires becomes worthless. On certain exchanges, in-the-money options are automatically exercised on their expiration date, but on others unexercised options simply become worthless after their expiration date.

Regardless of how much the market swings, the most an option buyer can lose is the option premium. The option buyer deposits his premium with his broker, and the money goes to the option seller. Option sellers, on the other hand, face risks similar to participants in the futures markets. For example, since the seller of a call option is assigned a short futures position if the option is exercised, his risk is the same as someone who initially sold a futures contract. Because no one can predict exactly how the market will move, the option seller typically posts margin to demonstrate his ability to meet any potential contractual obligations.

34

Options on Forward Contracts or Commodities

Options on forward contracts or commodities operate in a manner similar to options on futures contracts. An option on a forward contract or commodity gives the buyer of the option the right, but not the obligation, to take a position at a specified price in the underlying forward contract or commodity. However, unlike options on futures contracts, options on forward contracts or on commodities are individually negotiated contracts between counterparties and are typically traded in the OTC market. Therefore, options on forward contracts and physical commodities possess many of the same characteristics of forward contracts with respect to offsetting positions and credit risk that are described above.

Swap Contracts

Swap transactions generally involve contracts between two parties to exchange a stream of payments computed by reference to a notional amount and the price of the asset that is the subject of the swap. Swap contracts are principally traded off-exchange, although certain swap contracts are also being traded in electronic trading facilities and cleared through clearing organizations.

Swaps are usually entered into on a net basis, that is, the two payment streams are netted out in a cash settlement on the payment date or dates specified in the agreement, with the parties receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments. Swaps do not generally involve the delivery of underlying assets or principal. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to swaps is generally limited to the net amount of payments that the party is contractually obligated to make. In some swap transactions one or both parties may require collateral deposits from the counterparty to support that counterparty’s obligation under the swap agreement. If the counterparty to such a swap defaults, the risk of loss consists of the net amount of payments that the party is contractually entitled to receive less any collateral deposits it is holding.

Some swap transactions are cleared through central counterparties. “Clearing” refers to the process by which a trade that is bilaterally executed by two parties is submitted to a central clearing counterparty, via a clearing member (i.e.(i.e., an FCM), and replaced by two mirror swaps, with the central clearing counterparty becoming the counterparty to both of the initial parties to the swap. These transactions, known as cleared swaps, involve two counterparties first agreeing to the terms of a swap transaction, then submitting the transaction to a clearing house that acts as the central counterparty. Once accepted by the clearing house, the original swap transaction is terminated and replaced by two mirror trade andtrades, for which the central clearing counterparty becomes the counterparty to each of the original parties based upon the trade terms determined in the original transaction. In this manner each individual swap counterparty reduces its risk of loss due to counterparty nonperformance because the clearing house acts as the counterparty to each transaction.


Commodities Regulation

Futures exchanges in the United States are subject to varying degrees of regulation under the CEA depending on whether such exchange is a designated contract market, exempt board of trade or electronic trading facility. Clearing organizations are also subject to the CEA and the rules and regulations adopted thereunder and administered by the CFTC. The CFTC is the governmental agency charged with responsibility for regulation of futures exchanges and commodity interest trading. The CFTC’s function is to implement the CEA’s objectives of preventing price manipulation and excessive speculation and promoting orderly and efficient commodity interest markets. In addition, the various exchanges and clearing organizations themselves exercise regulatory and supervisory authority over their member firms.

The CFTC also regulates the activities of “commodity trading advisors” and “commodity pool operators” and the CFTC has adopted regulations with respect to certain of such persons’ activities. Pursuant to its authority, the CFTC requires a CPO, such as USCF, to keep accurate, current and orderly records with respect to each pool it operates. The CFTC may suspend, modify or terminate the registration of any registrant for failure to comply with CFTC rules or regulations. Suspension, restriction or termination of USCF’s registration as a CPO would prevent it, until such time (if any) as such registration were to be reinstated, from managing, and might result in the termination of, the Trust Series or the Related Public Funds.

Under certain circumstances, the CEA grants shareholders the right to institute a reparations proceeding before the CFTC against USCF (as a registered commodity pool operator), as well as those of their respective employees who are required to be registered under the CEA. Shareholders may also be able to maintain a private right of action for certain violations of the CEA.

Pursuant to authority in the CEA, the NFA has been formed and registered with the CFTC as a registered futures association. The NFA is the only self-regulatory association for commodities professionals other than the exchanges. As such, the NFA promulgates rules governing the conduct of commodity professionals and disciplines those professionals that do not comply with such standards. The

35

CFTC has delegated to the NFA responsibility for the registration of commodity pool operators. USCF is a member of the NFA. As a member of the NFA, USCF is subject to NFA standards relating to fair trade practices, financial condition, and consumer protection.

The CEA requires all FCMs, i.e., USCI’s CPER’s or USAG’sCPER’s clearing brokers, to meet and maintain specified fitness and financial requirements, to segregate customer funds from proprietary funds and account separately for all customers’ funds and positions, and to maintain specified books and records open to inspection by the staff of the CFTC. The CFTC has similar authority over introducing brokers, or persons who solicit or accept orders for commodity interest trades but who do not accept margin deposits for the execution of trades. The CEA authorizes the CFTC to regulate trading by FCMs and by their officers and directors, permits the CFTC to require action by exchanges in the event of market emergencies, and establishes an administrative procedure under which customers may institute complaints for damages arising from alleged violations of the CEA.

The regulations of the CFTC and the NFA prohibit any representation by a person registered with the CFTC or by any member of the NFA, that registration with the CFTC, or membership in the NFA, in any respect indicates that the CFTC or the NFA, as the case may be, has approved or endorsed that person or that person’s trading program or objectives. The registrations and memberships of the parties described in this summary must not be considered as constituting any such approval or endorsement. Likewise, no futures exchange has given or will give any similar approval or endorsement.

CFTC Regulationsregulations require enhanced customer protections, risk management programs, internal monitoring and controls, capital and liquidity standards, customer disclosures and auditing and examination programs for FCMs. These regulations are intended to afford greater assurances to market participants that customer segregated funds and secured amounts are protected, customers are provided with appropriate notice of the risks of futures trading and of the FCMs with which they may choose to do business, FCMs are monitoring and managing risks in a robust manner, the capital and liquidity of FCMs are strengthened to safeguard the continued operations, and the auditing and examination programs of the CFTC and the self-regulatory organizations are monitoring the activities of FCMs in a thorough manner.

Each Trust Series’ investors are afforded prescribed rights for reparations under the CEA against USCF (as a registered commodity pool operator), as well as its respective employees who are required to be registered under the CEA. Investors may also be able to maintain a private right of action for violations of the CEA. The CFTC has adopted rules implementing the reparation provisions of the CEA, which provide that any person may file a complaint for a reparations award with the CFTC for violation of the CEA against a floor broker or an FCM, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, CPO, and their respective associated persons.

The regulation of commodity interest trading in the United States and other countries is an evolving area of the law. Below are discussed several key regulatory items that are relevant to the Funds. The various statements made in this summary are subject to modification by legislative action and changes in the rules and regulations of the CFTC, the NFA, the futures exchanges, clearing organizations and other regulatory bodies. In addition, with regard to any other rules that the CFTC or SEC may adopt in the future, the effect of any such regulatory changes on the Trust and each Trust Series is impossible to predict, but it could be substantial and adverse.

33 

Futures Contracts and Position Limits

The CFTC is generally prohibited by statute from regulating trading on non-U.S.Position Limits Rule establishes federal position limits for 25 core referenced futures exchangescontracts (comprised of agricultural, energy and markets. The CFTC, however, has adopted regulations relatingmetals futures contracts), futures and options linked to the marketing of non-U.S.core referenced futures contracts, in the United States. These regulations permit certain contracts on non-U.S. exchanges to be offered and sold in the United States.

As discussed above, the CFTC has proposed to adopt limits on speculative positions in 25 physical commodity futures, and option contracts as well as swaps that are economically equivalent to suchthe core referenced futures contracts in the agriculture, energy and metals markets. The Position Limit Rules would, among other things: identify which contractsthat all market participants must comply with, with certain exemptions.

Certain Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts are subject to speculative position limits; set thresholds that restrictlimits under the size of speculative positions that a person may holdPosition Limits Rule, and the Trust Series’ trading does not qualify for an exemption therefrom. Accordingly, the Position Limits Rule could inhibit the Trust Series’ ability to invest in the spot month, other individual months,Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and all months combined; create an exemption for positions that constitute bona fide hedging transactions; impose responsibilities on DCMs and SEFs to establish position limits or, in some cases, position accountability rules; and apply to both futures and swaps across four relevant venues: OTC, DCMs, SEFs as well as certain non-U.S. located platforms. The CFTC’s first attempt at finalizing the Position Limit Rules, in 2011, was successfully challenged by market participants in 2012 and, since then, the CFTC has re-proposed them and solicited comments from market participants multiple times. At this time, it is unclear how the Position Limit Rules may affect the Trust Series, but the effect may be substantial and adverse. By way of example, the Position Limit Rules maythereby could negatively impact the ability of athe Trust Series to meet its investment objectives through limits that may inhibit USCF’s ability to sell additional Creation Baskets of a Trust Series.

Until such time as the Position Limit Rules are adopted, the regulatory architecture in effect prior to the adoption of the Position Limit Rules will govern transactions in commodities and related derivatives. Under that system, the CFTC enforces federal limits on speculation in nine agricultural products (e.g., corn, wheat and soy), while futures exchanges establish and enforce position limits and accountability levels for other agricultural products and certain energy products (e.g., oil and natural gas). As a result, a Trust Series may be limited with respect to the size of its investments in any commodities subject to these limits.

Under existing and recently adopted CFTC regulations, for the purpose of position limits, a market participant is generally required, subject to certain narrow exceptions, to aggregate all positions for which that participant controls the trading decisions with all positions for which that participant has a 10 percent or greater ownership interest in an account or position, as well as the positions of two or more persons acting pursuant to an express or implied agreement or understanding with that participant. The Aggregation Rules will also apply with respect to the Position Limit Rules if and when such Position Limit Rules are adopted.

objective.

Margin Requirements

Futures and Cleared Swaps

Original or initial margin is the minimum amount of funds that must be deposited by a commodity interest trader with the trader’s broker to initiate and maintain an open position in futures contracts. Maintenance margin is the amount (generally less than the original margin) to which a trader’s account may decline before he must deliver additional margin. A margin deposit is like a cash performance bond. It helps assure the trader’s performance of the futures contracts that he or she purchases or sells. Futures contracts are customarily bought

36

and sold on initial margin that represents a very small percentage (ranging upward from 5%) of the aggregate purchase or sales price of the contract. Because of such low margin requirements, price fluctuations occurring in the futures markets may create profits and losses that, in relation to the amount invested, are greater than are customary in other forms of investment or speculation. As discussed below, adverse price changes in the futures contract may result in margin requirements that greatly exceed the initial margin. In addition, the amount of margin required in connection with a particular futures contract is set from time to time by the exchange on which the contract is traded and may be modified from time to time by the exchange during the term of the contract.

Brokerage firms, such as the Trust Series’ clearing brokers, carrying accounts for traders in commodity interest contracts may not accept lower, and generally require higher, amounts of margin as a matter of policy to further protect themselves. The clearing brokers require a Trust Series to make margin deposits equal to exchange minimum levels for all commodity interest contracts. This requirement may be altered from time to time in the clearing brokers’ discretion.

Margin requirements are computed each day by the relevant clearing organization and a trader’s clearing broker. When the market value of a particular open commodity interest position changes to a point where the margin on deposit does not satisfy maintenance margin requirements, a margin call is made by the broker. With respect to a Trust Series’ trading, a Trust Series (and not its investors) is subject to margin calls.

Finally, many major U.S. exchanges have passed certain cross margining arrangements involving procedures pursuant to which the futures and options positions held in an account would, in the case of some accounts, be aggregated and margin requirements would be assessed on a portfolio basis, measuring the total risk of the combined positions.

Options

When a trader purchases an option, there is no margin requirement; however, the option premium must be paid in full. When a trader sells an option, on the other hand, he or she may be required to deposit margin in an amount determined by the margin requirements established for the underlying interest and, in addition, an amount substantially equal to the current premium for the option. The margin requirements imposed on the selling of options, although adjusted to reflect the probability that out-of-the-money options will not be exercised, can in fact be higher than those imposed in dealing in the futures markets directly. Complicated margin requirements apply to spreads and conversions, which are complex trading strategies in which a trader acquires a mixture of options positions and positions in the underlying interest.

34 

OTC Swaps

In October 2015,Rules put in place by U.S. federal banking regulators, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the FDIC, the Farm Credit Administration,CFTC and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (each an “Agency” and, collectively,SEC require the “Agencies”) jointly adopted final rules to establish minimumdaily exchange of variation margin and capital requirementsinitial margin for registeredswaps between swap dealers, major swap participants, security-based swap dealers, and major security-based swap participants (“Swap Entities”) that are subject to the jurisdiction of one of the Agencies (such entities, “Covered Swap Entities”, and the joint final rules, the “Final Margin Rules”).

The Final Margin Rules will subject non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps between Covered Swap Entities and their counterparties that are “financial end-users” (such rules, the “Margin Rules”). The Margin Rules require Swap Entities and between Coveredto exchange variation margin with all of their counterparties who are financial end-users. The minimum variation margin amount is the daily mark-to-market change in the value of the swap, taking into account the amount of variation margin previously posted or collected. Swap Entities andare required to exchange initial margin with their financial end users thatend-users who have material“material swaps exposureexposure” (i.e., an average daily aggregate notional of $8 billion or more in non-cleared swaps calculated in accordance with the Final Margin Rules), to a mandatory two-way minimum initial margin requirement.. The minimum amount of the initial margin required to be posted or collected would be either the amount calculated by the Covered Swap Entity using a standardized schedule set forth as an appendix to the Final Margin Rules, which provides the gross initial margin (as a percentage of total notional exposure) for certain asset classes, or an internal margin model of the Covered Swap Entity conforming to the requirements of the Final Margin Rules that is approved by the Agency having jurisdiction over the particular Covered Swap Entity. The Final Margin Rules specify the types of collateral that may be posted or collected as initial margin for non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps with financial end usersor variation margin (generally cash, certain government, government-sponsored enterprise securities, certain liquid debt, certain equity securities, certain eligible publicly traded debt, and gold); and sets forth haircuts for certain collateral asset classes.

The Final Margin Rules require minimum variation margin to be exchanged daily for non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps between Covered Swap Entities and Swap Entities and between Covered Swap Entities and all financial end-users (without regard to the swaps exposure of the particular financial end-user). The minimum variation margin amountNo Trust Series is the daily mark-to-market change in the value of the swap to the Covereda Swap Entity taking into account variation margin previously posted or collected. For non-cleared swaps and security-based swaps between Covered Swap Entities and financial end-users, variation margin may be posted or collected in cash or non-cash collateral that is considered eligible for initial margin purposes. Variation margin is not subject to segregation with an independent, third-party custodian, and may, if permitted by contract, be rehypothecated.

The initial margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules are being phased in over time, and the variation margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules are currently in effect. The Trust Series are not Covered Swap Entities under the Final Margin Rules, but they areeach is a financial end-users.end-user. Accordingly, theeach Trust Series are currentlywill be subject to the variation margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules.Rules for any swaps that it enters into. However, theno Trust Series do not havehas material swaps exposure and, accordingly, theno Trust Series will not be subject to the initial margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act required the CFTC and the SEC to adopt their own margin rules to apply to a limited number of registered swap dealers, security-based swap dealers, major swap participants, and major security-based swap participants that are not subject to the jurisdiction of one of the Agencies. On December 16, 2015, the CFTC finalized its margin rules, which are substantially the same as the Final Margin Rules and have the same implementation timeline. The SEC has yet to finalize its margin rules.

Mandatory Trading and Clearing of Swaps

CFTC regulations require that certain swap transactions be executed on organized exchanges or “swap execution facilities” and cleared through regulated clearing organizations (“derivative clearing organizations” (“DCOs”)), if the CFTC mandates the central clearing of a particular class of swap and such swap is “made available to trade” on a swap execution facility. Currently, swap dealers, major swap participants, commodity pools, certain private funds and entities predominantly engaged in activities that are financial in nature are required to execute on a swap execution facility, and clear, certain interest rate swaps and index-based credit default swaps. As a result, if a Trust Series enters into an interest rate or index-based credit default swapsswap that is subject to these requirements, such swap will be

37

required to be executed on a swap execution facility and centrally cleared. Mandatory clearing and “made available to trade” determinations with respect to additional types of swaps are expectedmay be issued in the future, and, when finalized, could require each Trust Series to electronically execute and centrally clear certain OTC instruments presently entered into and settled on a bi-lateral basis. If a swap is required to be cleared, initial and variation margin requirements are set by the relevant clearing organization, subject to certain regulatory requirements and guidelines. Additional margin may be required and held by a Trust Series’sSeries’ FCM.

Other Requirements for Swaps

In addition to the margin requirements described above, swapsSwaps that are not required to be cleared and executed on ana SEF but that are executed bilaterally are also subject to various requirements pursuant to CFTC regulations, including, among other things, reporting and recordkeeping requirements and, depending on the status of the counterparties, trading documentation requirements and dispute resolution requirements.


Derivatives Regulations in Non-U.S. Jurisdictions

In addition to U.S. laws and regulations, a Trust Series may be subject to non-U.S. derivatives laws and regulations if it engages in futures and/or swap transactions with non-U.S. persons. For example, each Trust Series may be impacted by European laws and regulations to the extent that it engages in futures transactions on European exchanges or derivatives transactions with European entities. Other jurisdictions impose requirements applicable to futures and derivatives that are similar to those imposed by the U.S., including position limits, margin, clearing and trade execution requirements.

The CFTC is generally prohibited by statute from regulating trading on non-U.S. futures exchanges and markets. The CFTC, however, has adopted regulations relating to the marketing of non-U.S. futures contracts in the United States. These regulations permit certain contracts on non-U.S. exchanges to be offered and sold in the United States.

SEC Reports

The Trust makes available, free of charge, on its website, its annual reports on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, its current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after these forms are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. These reports are also available from the SEC through its website at: www.sec.gov.

CFTC Reports

The Trust also makes available its monthly reports and its annual reports required to be prepared and filed with the NFA under the CFTC regulations.

Intellectual Property

USCF owns trademark registrations for USCI (and Design) (U.S. Reg. No. 4437230) for “fund“Fund investment services,” in use since September 30, 2012, and USCI UNITED STATES COMMODITY INDEX FUND (U.S. Reg. No. 4005166) for “fund investment services,” in use since August 10, 2010, and USCI UNITED STATES COMMODITY INDEX FUND (and Design) (U.S. Reg. No. 4005167) for “fund“Fund investment services,” in use since August 10, 2010. USCF owns trademark registrations for CPER UNITED STATES COPPER INDEX FUND (and Design) (U.S. Reg. No. 4440922) for “Financial investment services in the field of copper futures contracts, cash-settled options on copper futures contracts, forward contracts for copper, over-the-counter transactions based on the price of copper, and indices based on the foregoing,” in use since September 30, 2012, CPER UNITED STATES COPPER INDEX FUND (and Mining Design) (U.S. Reg. no. 4304002) for “fund investment services,” in use since November 15, 2011, UNITED STATES COPPER INDEX FUND (U.S. Reg. No. 4270057) for “fund“Fund investment services,” in use since November 15, 2011, and THE FIRST COPPER ETF (U.S. Reg. No. 4472746), filed on February 28, 2013. USCF owns trademark registrations for UNITED STATES AGRICULTURE INDEX FUND (U.S. Reg. No. 4270059 for “fund investment services,” in use since April 13, 2012, USAG UNITED STATES AGRICULTURE INDEX FUND (and Design) (U.S. Reg. No. 4304003) for “fund investment services,” in use since April 13, 2012, and USAG UNITED STATES AGRICULTURE INDEX FUND (and Leaf Design) (U.S. Reg. No. 4440921) for “Financial investment services in the field of agriculturecopper futures contracts, cash-settled options on agriculturecopper futures contracts, forward contracts for agriculture,copper, over-the-counter transactions based on the price of agriculture,copper, and indices based on the foregoing,” in use since June 28,February 13, 2012. USCF relies upon these trademarks through which it markets its services and strives to build and maintain brand recognition in the market and among current and potential investors. So long as USCF continues to use these trademarks to identify its services, without challenge from any third party, and properly maintains and renews the trademark registrations under applicable laws, rules and regulations, it will continue to have indefinite protection for these trademarks under current laws, rules and regulations.

USCF owns trademark registrations for USCF (and Design) (U.S. Reg. No. 5127374) for “Fund investment services,” in use since April 10, 2016, USCF (U.S. Reg No. 5040755) for “fund investment services,”, and USCF UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUNDS LLC & Design (U.S. Reg. No. 4304004) for “fund“Fund investment services,” in use since June 24, 2008. USCF UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUNDS LLC THE 3RD GENERATION OF COMMODITY INDEX FUNDS (U.S. Reg. No. 4250812), USCF THE 3RD GENERATION OF COMMODITY INDEX FUNDS (U.S. Reg. No 4250813, USCF UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUNDS LLC THE 3RD GENERATION OF COMMODITY INDEX FUNDS (U.S. Reg No. 4258460)2008, and USCF THE 3RD GENERATION OF COMMODITY INDEX FUNDS (U.S. Reg No. 4258461) in use since May 14, 2012.  USCF applied for trademark registration for INVEST IN WHAT’S REAL (Serial(U.S. Reg. No. 87073498)5450808) for “Fund investment services,” in use since April 2014.2016. USCF relies upon these trademarks and service mark through which it markets its services and strives to build and maintain brand recognition in the market and among current and potential

38

investors. So long as USCF continues to use these trademarks to identify its services, without challenge from any third party, and properly maintains and renews the trademark registrations under applicable laws, rules and regulations; it will continue to have indefinite protection for these trademarks under current laws, rules and regulations. USCF has been granted two patents Nos. 7,739,186 and 8,019,675, for systems and methods for an exchange traded fund (ETF) that tracks the price of one or more commodities.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The following risk factors should be read in connection with the other information included in this annual report on Form 10-K, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and financial statements and the related notes.

Each Trust Series’ investment objective is for the daily percentage changechanges in the NAV per share to reflect the daily percentage changes of the Applicable Index, less the Trust Series’ expenses. Each Trust Series seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in a combination of Futures Contracts and Other Commodity Related Investments such that the daily percentage changes in its NAV, measured in percentage terms, will closely track the changes in the daily price of the Applicable Index, also measured in percentage terms. Each Trust Series’ investment strategy is designed to provide investors with a cost-effective way to invest indirectly in various commodities and to hedge against movements in the spot price of applicable commodities. An investment in a Trust Series therefore, involves investment risk and correlation risk, or the risk that investors purchasing shares to hedge against movements in the price of commodities will have an efficient hedge only if the return from their shares closely correlates with the return of the Applicable Index. In addition to investment risk and correlation risk, an investment in a Trust Series involves tax risks, OTC risks, and other risks.

36 

Investment Risk

The NAV of a Trust Series shares relates directly to the value of its assets invested in accordance with the Applicable Index and other assets held by a Trust Series and fluctuations in the prices of these assets could materially adversely affect an investment in a Trust Series’ shares.

The net assets of each Trust Series consist primarily of investments in Futures Contracts and, to a lesser extent, in Other Commodity-Related Investments. The NAV of a Trust Series’ shares relates directly to the value of these assets (less liabilities, including accrued but unpaid expenses), which in turn relates to the market price of the commodities which comprise the Applicable Index.

Economic conditions.conditions. The demand for commodities, in general, correlates closely with general economic growth rates. The occurrence of recessions or other periods of low or negative economic growth will typically have a direct adverse impact on commodity prices, demand and, therefore, may have an adverse impact on commodity prices. Other factors that affect general economic conditions in the world or in a major region, such as changes in population growth rates, periods of civil unrest, military conflicts, war (such as the current war between Russia and Ukraine), pandemics (e.g., COVID-19), government austerity programs, or currency exchange rate fluctuations, can also impact the demand for commodities. Sovereign debt downgrades, defaults, inability to access debt markets due to credit or legal constraints, liquidity crises, the breakup or restructuring of fiscal, monetary, or political systems such as the European Union, and other events or conditions (e.g., pandemics such as COVID-19)that impair the functioning of financial markets and institutions also may adversely impact the demand for commodities.

Other demand-related factors.factors. Other factors may affect the demand for certain commodities and therefore their price. For example, with respect to energy commodities, such factors may include technological improvements in energy efficiency; seasonal weather patterns, which affect the demand for commodities associated with heating and cooling; increased competitiveness of alternative energy sources that have so far generally not been competitive with such commodity without the benefit of government subsidies or mandates; and changes in technology or consumer preferences that alter fuel choices, such as toward alternative fueled vehicles.vehicles or electric transportation and broad-based changes in personal income levels. With respect to agricultural commodities, changes in consumer preference may lead to demand for a commodity such as grains.

Other supply-related factors.factors. Commodities prices also vary depending on a number of factors affecting supply.supply, including geopolitical risk associated with wars (such as the current war between Russia and Ukraine), terrorist attacks and tensions between countries, including sanctions imposed as a result of the foregoing that can adversely affect commodity trade flows by limiting or disrupting trade between countries or regions. For example, increased supply from the development of hybrid crops (such as corn and soybeans) and technologies for efficient farming tends to reduce prices in such commodity to the extent such supply increases are not offset by commensurate growth in demand. Similarly, increases in industry manufacturing capacity may impact the supply of a particular crop. World food supply levels can also be affected by factors that reduce available supplies, such as embargoes, the occurrence of geopolitical

39

risk associated with wars, hostile actions,terrorist attacks and tensions between countries, including sanctions imposed as a result of the foregoing that can adversely affect commodity trade flows by limiting or disrupting trade between countries or regions, natural disasters, disruptions in competitors’ operations, or unexpected unavailability of distribution channels that may disrupt supplies. Technological change can also alter the relative costs for companies to produce, and process and distribute a commodity, which in turn may affect the supply of and demand of such commodity.

Other market factors.factors. The supply of and demand for agricultural and other commodities may also be impacted by changes in interest rates, inflation, and other local or regional market conditions.

Price Volatility May Possibly Causevolatility may possibly cause the Total Losstotal loss of Your Investment. your investment.Futures contracts have a high degree of price variability and are subject to occasional rapid and substantial changes. Consequently, you could lose all or substantially all of your investment in a Trust Series.

Significant market volatility has recently occurred in the commodities markets. Such volatility is attributable in part to the COVID-19 pandemic, related supply chain disruptions, war, including the war between Russia and Ukraine, and continuing disputes among oil-producing countries. These and other events could cause continuing or increased volatility in the future, which may affect the value, pricing and liquidity of some investments or other assets, including those held by or invested in by a Trust Series and the impact of which could limit the Trust Series’ ability to have a substantial portion of its assets invested in the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts. In such a circumstance, the Trust Series could, if it determined it appropriate to do so in light of market conditions and regulatory requirements, invest in other Futures Contracts and/or Other Related Investments.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and sanctions brought by the United States and other countries against Russia and others, have caused disruptions in many business sectors, resulting in significant market disruptions that may lead to increased volatility in the price of certain commodities, and may lead to volatility in a Trust Series’ NAV or share price.

On February 24, 2022, Russia launched a large-scale invasion of Ukraine. The extent and duration of the military action, and resulting sanctions, and future market or supply disruptions in the region, are impossible to predict, but could be significant and may have a severe adverse effect on the region.

The United States and other countries and certain international organizations have imposed broad-ranging economic sanctions on Russia and certain Russian individuals, banking entities and corporations as a response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and additional sanctions may be imposed in the future. Such sanctions (and any future sanctions) will adversely impact the economies of Russia and Ukraine, and certain sectors of each country’s economy may be particularly affected, including but not limited to, financial services, energy, metals and mining, engineering and defense and defense-related materials sectors. Among other things, the extent and duration of the military action, the responses of countries and political bodies to Russia’s actions, including sanctions, future market or supply disruptions, and Ukraine’s military response and the potential for wider conflict may increase financial market volatility generally, have severe adverse effects on regional and global economic markets, and cause volatility in the markets for commodities including the price of commodity futures, and the NAV or share price of a Trust Series.

A resolution to the war in Ukraine also could impact the markets for certain commodities, and may have collateral impacts, including increased volatility, and cause disruptions to the availability of certain commodities, commodity and futures prices and the supply chain globally. The longer-term impact on commodities and futures prices, including the spot price of the commodities that the Trust Series invest in and the prices of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, is difficult to predict and depends on a number of factors that may have a negative impact on the Trust Series in the future.

Infectious disease outbreaks like COVID-19 could negatively affect the valuation and performance of the Trust Series’ investments.

An outbreak of infectious respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 was first detected in China in December 2019 and spread globally. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. COVID-19 resulted in numerous deaths, travel restrictions, closed international borders, enhanced health screenings at ports of entry and elsewhere, disruption of and delays in healthcare service preparation and delivery, prolonged quarantines and the imposition of both local and more widespread “work from home” measures, cancellations, loss of employment, supply chain disruptions, and lower consumer and institutional demand for goods and services, as well as general concern and uncertainty. The ongoing spread of COVID-19 has had, and may continue to have, a material adverse impact on local economies in the affected jurisdictions and also on the global economy, as cross border commercial activity and market sentiment were impacted by the outbreak and government and other measures seeking to contain its spread.

40

Infectious disease outbreaks like COVID-19 may arise in the future and could adversely affect individual issuers and capital markets in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen. In addition, actions taken by government and quasi-governmental authorities and regulators throughout the world in response to such an outbreak, including the potential for significant fiscal and monetary policy changes, may affect the value, volatility, pricing and liquidity of some investments or other assets, including those held by or invested in by the Trust Series. Public health crises caused by infectious disease outbreaks may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social and economic risks in certain countries or globally and their duration cannot be determined with certainty.

Historical performance of a Trust Series and the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts is not indicative of future performance.

Past performance of a Trust Series or the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts is not necessarily indicative of future results. Therefore, past performance of a Trust Series or the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts should not be relied upon in deciding whether to buy shares of a Trust Series.

Correlation Risk

An investment in a Trust Series may provide little or no diversification benefits. Thus, in a declining market, a Trust Series may have no gains to offset losses from other investments, and an investor may suffer losses on an investment in a Trust Series while incurring losses with respect to other asset classes.

Investors purchasing shares to hedge against movements in the price of commodities will have an efficient hedge only if the return from their shares closely correlates with the return from the Applicable Index, which in turn, correlates with the price of commodities that comprise the Applicable Index. Investing in shares of a Trust Series for hedging purposes involvesincludes the following risks:

The market price at which the investor buys or sells shares may be significantly more or less than NAV.

The market price at which the investor buys or sells shares may be significantly more or less than NAV.
Daily percentage changes in NAV may not closely correlate with daily percentage changes in the price of the Applicable Benchmark.
Daily percentage changes in the prices of the Applicable Benchmark may not closely correlate with daily percentage changes in the price of the commodities that comprise the Applicable Index.

Historically, Futures Contracts and Other Commodity-Related Investments have generally been non-correlated to the performance of other asset classes such as stocks and bonds. Non-correlation means that there is a low statistically valid relationship between the performance of futures and other commodity interest transactions, on the one hand, and stocks or bonds, on the other hand.

However, there can be no assurance that such non-correlation will continue during future periods. If, contrary to historic patterns, a Trust Series’ performance were to move in the same general direction as the financial markets, investors will obtain little or no diversification benefits from an investment in a Trust Series’ shares. In such a case, a Trust Series may have no gains to offset losses from other investments, and investors may suffer losses on their investment in a Trust Series at the same time they incur losses with respect to other investments.

Variables such as drought, floods, weather military conflicts, pandemics (such as COVID-19), embargoes, tariffs and other political events may have a larger impact on commodity prices and commodity-linked instruments, including Futures Contracts and Other Commodity-Related Investments, than on traditional securities. These additional variables may create additional investment risks that subject a Trust Series’ investments to greater volatility than investments in traditional securities.

Non-correlation should not be confused with negative correlation, where the performance of two asset classes would be opposite of each other. There is no historical evidence that the spot price of the Applicable Benchmark.

Daily percentage changes in thea commodity and prices of other financial assets, such as stocks and bonds, are negatively correlated. In the Applicable Benchmark may not closely correlate with daily percentage changes inabsence of negative correlation, a Trust Series cannot be expected to be automatically profitable during unfavorable periods for the price of the commodities that comprise the Applicable Index.

stock market, or vice versa.

The market price at which investors buy or sell shares may be significantly moreless or lessmore than NAV.

Each Trust Series’ NAV per share will change throughout the day as fluctuations occur in the market value of such Trust Series’ portfolio investments. The public trading price at which an investor buys or sells shares during the day from their broker may be different from the NAV of the shares. PriceGenerally, price differences may relate primarily to supply and demand forces at work in the secondary trading market for shares that are closely related to, but not identical to, the same forces influencing the prices of the commodities comprising

41

the Applicable Index and the Applicable Index at any point in time. USCF expects that exploitation of certain arbitrage opportunities by Authorized Participants and their clients and customers will tend to cause the public trading price to track NAV per share closely over time, but there can be no assurance of that.


The NAV of a Trust Series’ shares may also be influenced by non-concurrent trading hours between the NYSE Arca and the various futures exchanges on which a commodity comprising the Applicable Index is traded. While the shares trade on the NYSE Arca from 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time, the trading hours for the futures exchanges on commodities trade may not necessarily coincide during all of this time. For example, while the shares trade on the NYSE Arca until 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time, liquidity in the global light sweet crude market will be reduced after the close of the NYMEX at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time. As a result, during periods when the NYSE Arca is open and the futures exchanges on which sweet, light crude oil is traded are closed, trading spreads and the resulting premium or discount on the shares may widen and, therefore, increase the difference between the price of the shares and the NAV of the shares.

Daily percentage changes in a Trust Series’ NAV may not correlate with daily percentage changes in the price of the Applicable Index.Index.

It is possible that the daily percentage changes in aA Trust Series’ NAV per share will change throughout the day as fluctuations occur in the market value of that Trust Series’ portfolio investments. The public trading price at which an investor buys or sells shares during the day from their broker may be different from the NAV of the shares, which is also the price shares can be redeemed with the Trust Series by Authorized Participants in Redemption Baskets. Generally, price differences may relate primarily to supply and demand forces at work in the secondary trading market for shares that are closely related to, but not identical to, the same forces influencing the prices of the commodities comprising the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and the Applicable Index at any point in time. USCF expects that exploitation of certain arbitrage opportunities by “Authorized Participants,” the institutional firms that directly purchase and redeem shares in blocks of 50,000 shares (“Creation Baskets” and “Redemption Baskets” respectively, together, “baskets”) and their clients and customers will tend to cause the public trading price to track NAV per share closely correlateover time, but there can be no assurance of that. For example, a shortage of a Trust Series’ shares in the market and other factors could cause that Trust Series’ shares to dailytrade at a premium. Investors should be aware that such premiums can be transitory. To the extent an investor purchases shares that include a premium (e.g., because of a shortage of shares in the market due to the inability of Authorized Participants to purchase additional Creation Baskets from a Trust Series that could be resold in the market) and the cause of the premium no longer exists causing the premium to disappear (e.g., because more shares are available for purchase from the Trust Series by Authorized Participants that could be resold into the market) such investor’s return on its investment would be adversely impacted due to the loss of the premium.

Daily percentage changes in the price of the Applicable Index. Non-correlation may be attributable to disruptions in the market for a particular commodity, the imposition of position or accountability limits by regulators or exchanges, or other extraordinary circumstances. As a Trust Series approaches or reaches position limits with respect to a Benchmark Component Futures Contract or other Futures Contracts or in view of market conditions, a Trust Series may begin investing in Other Commodity-Related Investments. In addition, a Trust Series is not able to replicate exactly the changes in the price of the Applicable Index because the total return generated by a Trust Series is reduced by expenses and transaction costs, including those incurred in connection with a Trust Series’ trading activities, and increased by interest income from a Trust Series’ holdings of Treasury securities. Tracking the Applicable Index requires trading of a Trust Series’ portfolio with a view to tracking the Applicable Index over time and is dependent upon the skills of USCF and its trading principals, among other factors.

Daily percentage changes in the price of the Benchmark Component Futures Contract may not correlate with daily percentage changes in the spot price of the corresponding commodity.

The correlation between changes in prices of aan Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract and the spot price of the corresponding commodity may at times be only approximate. The degree of imperfection of correlation depends upon circumstances such as variations in the speculative commodities market, supply of and demand for Futures Contracts (including the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract) and Other Commodity-Related Investments, and technical influences in futures trading.

In addition, a Trust Series is not able to replicate exactly the changes in the price of the Applicable Index because the total return generated by the Trust Series is reduced by expenses and transaction costs, including those incurred in connection with the Trust Series’ trading activities, and increased by interest income from the Trust Series’ holdings of Treasuries. Tracking the Applicable Index requires trading of the relevant Trust Series’ portfolio with a view to tracking the Applicable Index over time and is dependent upon the skills of USCF and its trading principals, among other factors.

An investment in a Trust Series is not a proxy for investing in the commodities markets, and the daily percentage changes in the price of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, or the NAV of the Trust Series, may not correlate with daily percentage changes in the spot price of the physical commodities that underlie the Applicable Index.

An investment in a Trust Series is not a proxy for investing in the commodities markets. To the extent that investors use a Trust Series as a means of indirectly investing in physical commodities, there is the risk that the daily changes in the price of the Trust Series’ shares on the NYSE Arca, on a percentage basis, will not closely track the daily changes in the spot price of the commodities on a percentage basis. This could happen if the price of shares traded on the NYSE Arca does not correlate closely with the value of the Trust Series’ NAV; the changes in the Trust Series’ NAV do not correlate closely with the changes in the price of the Benchmark Component Futures Contract; or the changes in the price of the Benchmark Component Futures Contract does not closely correlate with the changes in the

42

cash or spot price of the commodities. This is a risk because if these correlations do not exist, then investors may not be able to use the Trust Series as a cost-effective way to indirectly invest in commodities or as a hedge against movements in the spot price of commodities. The degree of correlation among a Trust Series’ share price, the price of the Benchmark Component Futures Contract and the spot price of commodities depends upon circumstances such as variations in the speculative commodities market, supply of and demand for Futures Contracts (including the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts) and Other Related Investments, and technical influences on trading futures contracts. Investors who are not experienced in investing in futures contracts or the factors that influence that market or speculative trading in futures markets and may not have the background or ready access to the types of information that investors familiar with these markets may have and, as a result, may be at greater risk of incurring losses from trading in a Trust Series’ shares than such other investors with such experience and resources.

The price relationship between each Applicable Index at any point in time and the Futures Contracts that will become the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts on the next rebalancing date will vary and may impact both a Trust Series’ total return and the degree to which its total return tracks that of commodity price indices.

The design of each Applicable Index is such that every month it is made up of different Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, and a Trust Series’ investment must be rebalanced on an ongoing basis to reflect the changing composition of the Applicable Index. In the event of a commodity futures market where near month contracts to expire trade at a higher price than next month contracts to expire, a situation referred todescribed as “backwardation,”“backwardation” in the futures market, then absent the impact of the overall movement in commodity prices, the value of the Applicable Index would tend to rise as it approaches expiration. As a result, a Trust Series may benefit because it would be selling more expensive contracts and buying less expensive ones on an ongoing basis. Conversely, in the event of a commodity futures market where near month contracts trade at a lower price than next month contracts, a situation referred todescribed as  “contango,”“contango” in the futures market, then absent the impact of the overall movement in commodity prices, the value of the Applicable Index would tend to decline as it approaches expiration. As a result, a Trust Series’ total return may be lower than might otherwise be the case because it would be selling less expensive contracts and buying more expensive ones. The impact of backwardation and contango may cause the total return of a Trust Series to vary significantly from the total return of other price references, such as the spot price of the commodities comprising the Applicable Index. In the event of a prolonged period of contango, andMoreover, absent the impact of rising or falling commodity prices, thisa prolonged period of contango could have a significant negative impact on a Trust Series’ per share NAV and total return and investors could lose part or all of their investment.

Accountability levels, position limits, and daily price fluctuation limits set by the exchanges have the potential to cause tracking error, which could cause the price of shares to substantially vary from the price of the Applicable Index.

Designated contract markets, such as the NYMEX and ICE Futures, have established accountability levels and position limits on the maximum net long or net short futures contracts in commodity interests that any person or group of persons under common trading control (other than as a hedge, which an investment by a Trust Series is not) may hold, own or control. These levels and position limits apply to the futures contracts that the Trust Series invest in to meet their investment objectives. In addition to accountability levels and position limits, the NYMEX and ICE Futures, also set daily price fluctuation limits on futures contracts. The daily price fluctuation limit establishes the maximum amount that the price of a futures contract may vary either up or down from the previous day’s settlement price. Once the daily price fluctuation limit has been reached in a particular futures contract, no trades may be made at a price beyond that limit.

As discussed above, the CFTC has proposed to adoptThe Position Limits Rule establishes federal position limits on speculative positions infor 25 physical commoditycore referenced futures contracts (comprised of agricultural, energy and metals futures contracts), futures and optionoptions linked to the core referenced futures contracts, as well asand swaps that are economically equivalent to suchthe core referenced futures contracts, and swaps that are economically equivalent to the core referenced futures contracts that all market participants must comply with, with certain exemptions.

Certain of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts will be subject to position limits under the Position Limits Rule, and the Trust Series’ trading does not qualify for an exemption therefrom. Accordingly, the Position Limits Rule could inhibit the Trust Series’ ability to invest in the agriculture, energyApplicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and metals markets. The Position Limit Rules would, among other things: identify which contracts are subject to speculative position limits; set thresholds that restrict the size of speculative positions that a person may hold in the spot month, other individual months, and all months combined; create an exemption for positions that constitute bona fide hedging transactions; impose responsibilities on DCMs and SEFs to establish position limits or, in some cases, position accountability rules; and apply to both futures and swaps across four relevant venues: OTC, DCMs, SEFs as well as certain non-U.S. located platforms. The CFTC’s first attempt at finalizing the Position Limit Rules, in 2011, was successfully challenged by market participants in 2012 and, since then, the CFTC has re-proposed them and solicited comments from market participants multiple times. At this time, it is unclear how the Position Limit Rules may affect the Trust Series, but the effect may be substantial and adverse. By way of example, the Position Limit Rules maythereby could negatively impact the ability of athe Trust Series to meet its investment objectives through limits that may inhibit USCF’s ability to sell additional Creation Baskets of a Trust Series.


Until such time as the Position Limit Rules are adopted, the regulatory architecture in effect prior to the adoption of the Position Limit Rules will govern transactions in commodities and related derivatives. Under that system, the CFTC enforces federal limits on speculation in nine agricultural products (e.g., corn, wheat and soy), while futures exchanges establish and enforce position limits and accountability levels for other agricultural products and certain energy products (e.g., oil and natural gas). As a result, a Trust Series may be limited with respect to the size of its investments in any commodities subject to these limits.objective.

Under existing and recently adopted CFTC regulations, for the purpose of position limits, a market participant is generally required, subject to certain narrow exceptions, to aggregate all positions for which that participant controls the trading decisions with all positions for which that participant has a 10 percent or greater ownership interest in an account or position, as well as the positions of two or more persons acting pursuant to an express or implied agreement or understanding with that participant. The Aggregation Rules will also apply with respect to the Position Limit Rules if and when such Position Limit Rules are adopted.

All of theseThese limits may potentially cause a tracking error between the price of a Trust Series’ shares and the Applicable Index. This may in turn prevent investors from being able to effectively use a Trust Series as a way to hedge against commodity-related losses or as a way to indirectly invest in a commodity.

43

Risk mitigation measures that could be imposed by the Trust Series’ FCMs have the potential to cause tracking error by limiting a Trust Series’ investments, including its ability to fully invest in the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract and other Futures Contracts, which could cause the price of the Trust SeriesSeries’ shares to substantially vary from the price of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.

The Trust Series’ FCMs have limiteddiscretion to impose limits on the size of their offering and eachpositions that a Trust Series is committedmay hold in the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts as well as certain other months. To date, the Trust Series’ FCMs have not imposed any such limits. However, were the FCMs to utilizing substantially allimpose limits on a Trust Series, such Trust Series’ ability to have a substantial portion of its assets invested in the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract and other Futures Contracts could be severely limited, which could lead the Trust Series to invest in other Futures Contracts or, potentially, Other Related Investments. The Trust Series could also have to more frequently rebalance and adjust the types of holdings in its portfolio than is currently the case. This could inhibit the Trust Series from pursuing its investment objective in the same manner that it has historically and currently.

In addition, when offering Creation Baskets for purchase, limitations imposed by exchanges and/or any of the FCMs could limit a Trust Series’ ability to invest the proceeds to purchaseof the purchases of Creation Baskets in Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and Other Commodity-Related Investments.other Futures Contracts. If athis were the case, the Trust Series encounters accountability levels, position limits, or price fluctuation limits for Futures Contracts onmay invest in other permitted investments, including Other Related Investments, and may hold larger amounts of Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents, which could impair the NYMEX or ICE Futures, it may then, if permitted under applicable regulatory requirements, purchase Futures Contracts on other exchanges that trade the listed applicable commodity futures or enter into swaps or other transactionsTrust Series’ ability to meet its investment objective. In addition, if a Trust Series exceeds accountability levels on either the NYMEX or ICE Futures and is required by such exchanges to reduce its holdings, such reduction could potentially cause a tracking error between the price of a Trust Series’ shares and the Applicable Index.

Tax Risk

Tax Risk

An investor’s tax liability may exceed the amount of distributions, if any, on its shares.

Cash or property will be distributed at the sole discretion of USCF. USCF has not and does not currently intend to make cash or other distributions with respect to shares. Investors will be required to pay U.S. federal income tax and, in some cases, state, local, or foreign income tax, on their allocable share of a Trust Series’ taxable income, without regard to whether they receive distributions or the amount or value of any distributions. Therefore, the tax liability of an investor with respect to its shares may exceed the amount of cash or value of property (if any) distributed.distributed with respect to such shares.

An investor’s allocable share of taxable income or loss may differ from its economic income or loss on itsthe shares.

Due to the application of the assumptions and conventions applied by a Trust Series in making allocations for tax purposes and other factors, an investor’s allocable share of a Trust Series’ income, gain, deduction or loss may be different than its economic profit or loss from itsthe shares for a taxable year. This difference could be temporary or permanent and, if permanent, could result in it being taxed on amounts in excess of its economic income.

Items of income, gain, deduction, loss and credit with respect to shares could be reallocated, and for taxable periods beginning after December 31, 2017,U.S. federal income tax purposes and the Trust Series could be liable for US. FederalU.S. federal income tax, if the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)IRS does not accept the assumptions and conventions applied by the Trust Series in allocating those items, with potential adverse consequences for an investor.

The U.S. federal income tax rules pertaining to entities taxedtreated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes are complex and their application to large, publicly traded entities such as the Trust Series is in many respects uncertain. The Trust Series applyapplies certain assumptions and conventions in an attempt to comply with the intent of the applicable rules and to report taxable income, gains, deductions, losses and credits in a manner that properly reflects shareholders’ economic gains and losses. TheseIt is possible that the IRS could successfully challenge the application by a Trust Series of these assumptions and conventions mayas not fully complycomplying with all aspects of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations, however, and it is possible that the IRS will successfully challenge the Trust Series’ allocation methods andwhich would require the Trust Series to reallocate items of income, gain, deduction, loss or credit in a manner that adversely affects investors. If this occurs, investors may be required to file an amended U.S. federal income tax return and to pay additional taxes, plus deficiency interest.interest, and may be subject to penalties.

In addition, for periods beginning after December 31, 2017, theThe Trust Series may be liable for U.S. federal income tax on any “imputed understatement”underpayment” of tax resulting from an adjustment as a result of an IRS audit. The amount of the imputed understatementunderpayment generally includes increases in allocations of items of income or gainsgain to any investor and decreases in allocations of items of deduction, loss, or credit to any investor without any offset for any corresponding reductions in allocations of items of income or gain to any investor or increases in allocations of items of deduction, loss, or credit to any investor. If the Trust Series is required to pay any U.S. federal income taxes on any imputed understatement,underpayment, the resulting tax liability would reduce the net assets of the Trust Series and would likely have an adverse impact on the value of the shares. Under certain

44

circumstances, the Trust Series may be eligible to make an election to cause the investors to take into account the amount of any imputed understatement,underpayment, including any associated interest and penalties. The ability of a publicly traded partnership such as the Trust Series to makeelect this electiontreatment is uncertain. If the election is made, the Trust Series would be required to provide investors who owned beneficial interests in the shares in the year to which the adjusted allocations relate with a statement setting forth their proportionate shares of the adjustment (“Adjusted K-1s”). The investors would be required to take the adjustment into account in the taxable year in which the Adjusted K-1s are issued. The resulting tax liability on an investor of taking the adjustment into account in the year in which the Adjusted K-1 is issued may be less favorable to the investor than if the adjustment were taken into account in the reviewed year.

39 

Each Trust Series could be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which may substantially reduce the value of the shares.

The Trust, on behalf of each Trust Series, has received an opinion of counsel that, under current U.S. federal income tax laws, each Trust Series will be treated as a partnership that is not taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, provided that (i) at least 90 percent of the Trust Series’ annual gross income will be derived from (a) income and gains from commodities (not held as inventory) or futures, forwards, options, swaps and other notional principal contracts with respect to commodities, and (b) interest income,income; (ii) the Trust and each Trust Series is organized and operated in accordance with its governing agreements and applicable lawlaw; and (iii) neither the Trust and eachnor the Trust Series does not electelects to be taxed as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Although USCF anticipates that each Trust Series has satisfied and will continue to satisfy the “qualifying income” requirement for all of its taxable years that result cannot be assured. No Trust Series has requested and nor will any Trust Seriesnot request any ruling from the IRS with respect to its classification as a partnership not taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the IRS were to successfully assert that a Trust Series is taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes in any taxable year, rather than passing through its income, gains, losses, deductions and deductionscredits proportionately to its shareholders, the Trust Series would be subject to U.S. federal income tax imposed at applicable corporate rates on its net income for the year at corporate tax rates.year. In addition, although USCF does not currently intend to make distributions with respect to its shares, if a Trust Series were treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, any distributions made with respect to the Trust Series’ shares would be taxable to Shareholdersshareholders as dividend income.income to the extent of a Trust Series’ current and accumulated earnings and profits. Taxation of the Trust and each Trust Series as a corporation could materially reduce the after-tax return on an investment in shares and could substantially reduce the value of the shares.

The Trust is organized as a Delaware statutory trust but each Trust Series is taxed as a limited partnership in accordance with the provisions of the Trust Agreement and applicable state law, but each Trust Series is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and therefore, each Trust Series has a more complex tax treatment than traditional mutual funds.

The Trust is organized as a Delaware statutory trust but each Trust Series is taxed as a limited partnership in accordance with the provisions of the Trust Agreement and applicable state law.law, but each Trust Series is taxed as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. No U.S. federal income tax is paid by any Trust Series on its income. Instead, each Trust Series will furnish shareholders each year with tax information on IRS ScheduleSchedules K-1 and/or K-3 (Form 1065) and each U.S. shareholder is required to report on its U.S. federal income tax return its allocable share of the income, gain, loss, deduction, and deductioncredit of each Trust Series. ThisThese amounts must be reported without regard to the amount (if any) of cash or property the shareholder receives as a distribution from an applicable Trust Series during the taxable year. A shareholder, therefore, may be allocated income or gain by a Trust Series but receive no cash distribution with which to pay the tax liability resulting from the allocation, or may receive a distribution that is insufficient to pay such liability.

IfIn addition to U.S. federal income taxes, shareholders may be subject to other taxes, such as state and local income taxes, unincorporated business taxes, business franchise taxes and estate, inheritance or intangible taxes that may be imposed by the various jurisdictions in which the Trust Series do business or own property or where the shareholders reside. Although an analysis of those various taxes is not presented here, each prospective shareholder should consider their potential impact on its investment in a Trust Series.  It is each shareholder’s responsibility to file the appropriate U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign tax returns.

If the Trust Series isare required to withhold tax with respect to any Non-U.S.non-U.S. shareholders, the cost of such withholding may be borne by all shareholders.

Under certain circumstances, athe Trust Series may be required to pay withholding tax with respect to allocations to Non-U.S.non-U.S. shareholders. Although the Trust Agreement provides that any such withholding will be treated as being distributed to the Non-U.S.non-U.S. shareholder, athe Trust Series may not be able to cause the economic cost of such withholding to be borne by the Non-U.S.non-U.S. shareholder on whose behalf such amounts were withheld since it does not generally expect to make any distributions. Under such circumstances, the economic cost of the withholding may be borne by all shareholders, not just the shareholders on whose behalf such amounts were withheld. This could have a material impact on the value of the shares.

45

The impact of changes in U.S. federal income tax reformlaws on each Trust Series is uncertain.

In general, legislative or other actions relating to U.S. federal income taxes could have a negative effect on the Trust Series is uncertain.

or their investors. The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. On December 22, 2017, H.R. 1,August 16, 2022, President Biden signed the bill formerly known as the Tax Cuts and JobsInflation Reduction Act of 20172022 (the “Tax Act”“IRA”), was signed into law. The Tax Act substantially altersAt this time, the U.S. federal tax system in a variety of ways, including significant changes to the taxation of business entities, the deductibility of interest expense, and the tax treatment of capital investment. WeTrust cannot predict with certainty how any changes in the tax lawsprovisions of the IRA or any other proposed or future tax legislation might affect the U.S. economyTrust, the Trust Series, investors in the Trust Series or the demand for andinvestments held by the price of commodities. As a result, it is possible that the Tax Act, as well as any U.S. Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions interpreting the Tax Act and any future legislation related to tax reform, could have unexpected or negative impacts on a Trust Series and some or all of its shareholders. ShareholdersSeries. Investors are urged to consult with their tax advisor regarding taxwith respect to the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in a Trust Series.

40 

our shares.

OTC Contract Risk

Each Trust Series will be subject to credit risk with respect to counterparties to OTC contracts entered into by the Trust on behalf of a Trust Series or held by special purpose or structured vehicles.

Each Trust Series faces the risk of non-performance by the counterparties to the OTC contracts. Unlike in futures contracts, the counterparty to these contracts is generally a single bank or other financial institution, rather than a clearing organization backed by a group of financial institutions. As a result, there will be greater counterparty credit risk in these transactions. A counterparty may not be able to meet its obligations to a Trust Series, in which case the Trust Series could suffer significant losses on these contracts. The two-way margining requirements imposed by U.S. regulators discussed in “Item 1. Business – Commodities Regulation,are intended to mitigate this risk.

Nevertheless, if If a counterparty becomes bankrupt or otherwise fails to perform its obligations due to financial difficulties, a Trust Series may experience significant delays in obtaining any recovery in a bankruptcy or other reorganization proceeding. The Trust on behalf of a Trust Series may obtain only limited recovery or may obtain no recovery in such circumstances.

Each Trust Series mitigates these risks by typically entering into transactions only with major, global financial institutions.

Valuing OTC derivatives may be less certain thatthan actively traded financial instruments.

In general, valuing OTC derivatives is less certain than valuing actively traded financial instruments such as exchange tradedexchange-traded futures contracts and securities or cleared swaps because, for OTC derivatives, the price and terms on which such OTC derivatives are entered into or can be terminated are individually negotiated, and those prices and terms may not reflect the best price or terms available from other sources. In addition, while market makers and dealers generally quote indicative prices or terms for entering into or terminating OTC contracts, they typically are not contractually obligated to do so, particularly if they are not a party to the transaction. As a result, it may be difficult to obtain an independent value for an outstanding OTC derivatives transaction.

Each Trust Series’ rights under an OTC contract may be restricted by regulations.

Regulations adopted by global prudential regulators that are now in effect require certain prudentially regulated entities and certain of their affiliates and subsidiaries (including swap dealers) to include in their derivatives contracts and certain other financial contracts terms that delay or restrict the rights of counterparties (such as a Trust Series) to terminate such contracts, foreclose upon collateral, exercise other default rights or restrict transfers of credit support in the event that the prudentially regulated entity and/or its affiliates are subject to certain types of resolution or insolvency proceedings. Similar regulations and laws have been adopted in non-U.S. jurisdictions that may apply to each Trust Series’ counterparties located in those jurisdictions. It is possible that these new requirements, as well as potential additional resulted government regulation, could adversely affect each Trust Series’ ability to terminate existing derivatives contracts, exercise default rights, or satisfy obligations owed to it with collateral received under such contracts.

The use of swap agreements may expose a Trust Series to early termination risk, which could result in significant losses to the Trust Series.

Swap agreements do not have uniform terms. A swap counterparty may have the right to close out the Trust Series’ position due to the occurrence of certain events (for example, if a counterparty is unable to hedge its obligations to the Trust Series, or if the Trust Series defaults on certain terms of the swap agreement, or if there is a material decline in the Trust Series’ NAV on a particular day) and request immediate payment of amounts owed by the Trust Series under the agreement. If the level of the Trust Series’ NAV has a dramatic intraday move, the terms of the swap agreement may permit the counterparty to close out a transaction with the Trust Series at a price calculated by the counterparty that, in good faith, represents such counterparty’s loss. which may not represent fair market value. A swap counterparty may also have the right to close out the Trust Series’ position for no reason, in some cases with same day notice.

46

Other Risks

Neither Trust Series is leveraged, but a Trust Series could become leveraged if it had insufficient assets to completely meet its margin or collateral requirements relating to its investments.

Neither Trust Series is leveraged, and neither intends to leverage, its assets through borrowings or otherwise, and each makes its investments accordingly. Consistent with the foregoing, each Trust Series’ announced investment intentions, and any changes thereto, will take into account the need for the Trust Series to make permitted investments that also allow it to maintain adequate liquidity to meet its margin and collateral requirements and to avoid, to the extent reasonably possible, the Trust Series becoming leveraged. If market conditions require it, a Trust Series may implement risk reduction procedures, which may include changes to its investments, and such changes may occur on short notice if they occur other than during a roll or rebalance period.

Although neither Trust Series borrows or will borrow money or use debt to satisfy its margin or collateral obligations in respect of its investments, it could become leveraged if the Trust Series were to hold insufficient assets that would allow it to meet not only the current, but also future, margin or collateral obligations required for such investments. Such a circumstance could occur if a Trust Series were to hold assets that have a value of less than zero.

USCF endeavors to have the value of each Trust Series’ Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents, whether held by the Trust Series or posted as margin or other collateral, at all times approximate the aggregate market value of its obligations under its Futures Contracts and Other Related Investments. Although permitted to do so under the Trust Agreement, neither Trust Series has, nor does it intend to, leverage its assets by making investments beyond its potential ability to meet the potential margin and collateral obligations relating to such investments. Consistent with this, each Trust Series’ investment decisions will take into account the need for the Trust Series to make permitted investments that also allow it to maintain adequate liquidity to meet its margin and collateral requirements and to avoid, to the extent reasonably possible, the Trust Series becoming leveraged, including by its holding of assets that have a high probability of having a value of less than zero. If market conditions require it, these risk reduction measures may occur on short notice.

A Trust Series may temporarily limit the offering of Creation Baskets.

A Trust Series may determine to limit the issuance of its shares through the offering of Creation Baskets to its Authorized Participants in order to allow it to reinvest the proceeds from sales of its Creation Baskets in currently permitted assets in a manner that meets its investment objective. A Trust Series will announce to the market through the filing of a Current Report on Form 8-K if it intends to limit the offering of Creation Baskets at any time. In such case, orders for Creation Baskets will be considered for acceptance in the order they are received by the Trust Series and the Trust Series would continue to accept requests for redemption of its shares from Authorized Participants through Redemption Baskets during the period of the limited offering of Creation Baskets.

The Trust Series pay fees and expenses that are incurred regardless of whether they are profitable.

Unlike mutual funds, commodity pools or other investment pools that manage their investments in an attempt to realize income and gains and distribute such income and gains to their investors, the Trust Series generally do not distribute cash shareholders. You should not invest in a Trust Series if you will need cash distributions from the Trust Series to pay taxes on your share of income and gains of the Trust Series, if any, or for any other reason.

You will have no rights to participate in the management of a Trust Series and will have to rely on the duties and judgment of USCF to manage the Trust Series.

The Trust Series is subject to actual and potential inherent conflicts involving USCF, various commodity futures brokers and “Authorized Participants,” USCF’s officers, directors and employees do not devote their time exclusively to the Trust Series. USCF’s personnel are directors, officers or employees of other entities that may compete with the Trust Series for their services, including other commodity pools (funds) that USCF manages. USCF could have a conflict between its responsibilities to the Trust Series and to those other entities. As a result of these and other relationships, parties involved with the Trust Series have a financial incentive to act in a manner other than in the best interest of the Trust Series and the shareholders.

Certain of a Trust Series’ investments could be illiquid, which could cause large losses to investors at any time or from time to time.

Futures positions cannot always be liquidated at the desired price. It is difficult to execute a trade at a specific price when there is a relatively small volume of buy and sell orders in a market. A market disruption, such as war or a foreign government taking political

47

actions that disrupt the market for its currency, its crude oil production or exports, or another major export, can also make it difficult to liquidate a position. Because both Futures Contracts and Other Commodity-Related Investments may be illiquid, a Trust Series’ Commodity Interests may be more difficult to liquidate at favorable prices in periods of illiquid markets and losses may be incurred during the period in which positions are being liquidated. The large size of the positions that a Trust Series may acquire increases the risk of illiquidity both by making its positions more difficult to liquidate and by potentially increasing losses while trying to do so.

OTC contracts that are not subject to clearing may be even less marketable than futures contracts because they are not traded on an exchange, do not have uniform terms and conditions, and are entered into based upon the creditworthiness of the parties and the availability of credit support, such as collateral, and in general, they are not transferable without the consent of the counterparty. These conditions make such contracts less liquid than standardized futures contracts traded on a commodities exchange and could adversely impact a Trust Series’ ability to realize the full value of such contracts. In addition, even if collateral is used to reduce counterparty credit risk, sudden changes in the value of OTC transactions may leave a party open to financial risk due to a counterparty default since the collateral held may not cover a party’s exposure on the transaction in such situations.

EachThe Trust Series isare not actively managed and trackstheir investment objectives are for the Applicable Index during periodsdaily changes in whichpercentage terms of their shares’ per share NAV for any period of 30 successive valuation days to be within plus/minus ten percent (10%) of the average daily percentage change in the price of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts are flat or declining, as well as whenover the price is rising.same period.

EachThe Trust Series isare not actively managed by conventional methods. Accordingly, if a Trust Series’ investments in Related Interests are declining in value, in the ordinary course, the Trust Series will not close out such positions except in connection with paying the proceeds to an Authorized Participant upon the redemption of a basket or closing out futuresits positions in the applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and other permitted investments (i) connection with the monthly change in the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.Contracts; (ii) when the Trust Series otherwise determines it would be appropriate to do so, e.g., due to regulatory requirements or risk mitigation measures; (iii) or to avoid the Trust Series becoming leveraged, and it reinvests the proceeds in new Benchmark Component Futures Contracts or other related investments to the extent possible. USCF will seek to cause the NAV of eacha Trust Series’Series shares to track the Applicable Index during periods in which the price is flat or declining as well as when the price is rising.

The ability of each Trust Series to invest in the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts could be limited as a result of any or all of the following: evolving market conditions, a change in regulatory accountability levels and position limits imposed on the Trust Series with respect to its investment in Futures Contracts, additional or different risk mitigation measures taken by market participants, generally, including a Trust Series, with respect to such Trust Series acquiring additional Futures Contracts, or such Trust Series selling additional shares.

A Trust Series may not meet the listing standards of NYSE Arca, which would adversely impact an investor’s ability to sell shares.

NYSE Arca may suspend a Trust Series’ shares from trading on the exchange with or without prior notice to the Trust Series upon failure of such Trust Series to comply with the NYSE’s listing requirements or, when in its sole discretion, the NYSE Arca determines that such suspension of dealings is in the public interest or otherwise warranted. There can be no assurance that the requirements necessary to maintain the listing of each Trust Series’ shares will continue to be met or will remain unchanged. If a Trust Series were unable to meet the NYSE’s listing standards and were to become delisted, an investor’s ability to sell its shares would be adversely impacted.

The NYSE Arca may halt trading in a Trust Series’ shares, which would adversely impact an investor’s ability to sell shares.

As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, each Trust Series’ shares are listed for trading on the NYSE Arca under the market symbols “USCI”, and “CPER” and “USAG”. Trading in shares may be halted due to market conditions or, in light of NYSE Arca rules and procedures, for reasons that, in the view of the NYSE Arca, make trading in shares inadvisable. In addition, trading is subject to trading halts caused by extraordinary market volatility pursuant to “circuit breaker” rules that require trading to be halted for a specified period based on a specified market decline. Additionally, there can be no assurance that the requirements necessary to maintain the listing of a Trust Series’ shares will continue to be met or will remain unchanged.

The liquidity of the shares may also be affected by the withdrawal from participation of Authorized Participants, which could adversely affect the market price of the shares.

In the event that one or more Authorized Participants which have substantial interests in the shares withdraw from participation, the liquidity of the shares will likely decrease, which could adversely affect the market price of the shares and result in investors incurring a loss on their investment.


48

Shareholders that are not Authorized Participants may only purchase or sell their shares in secondary trading markets, and the conditions associated with trading in secondary markets may adversely affect investors’ investment in the shares.

Only Authorized Participants may createdirectly purchase shares from, or redeem shares with, a Trust Series through Creation Baskets or Redemption Baskets.Baskets, respectively. All other investors that desire to purchase or sell shares must do so through the NYSE Arca or in other markets, if any, in which the shares may be traded. Shares may trade at a premium or discount relative to NAV per share.

The lack of an active trading market for a Trust Series’ shares may result in losses on an investor’s investment in a Trust Series at the time the investor sells the shares.

Although each Trust Series’ shares are listed and traded on the NYSE Arca, there can be no guarantee that an active trading market for the shares will be maintained. If an investor needs to sell shares at a time when no active trading market for them exists, the price the investor receives upon sale of the shares, assuming they were able to be sold, likely would be lower than if an active market existed.

Limited partners may have limited liability in certain circumstances, including potentially having liability for the return of wrongful distributions.

Under Delaware law, a limited partner might be held liable for a Trust Series’ obligations as if it were a general partner if the limited partner participates in the control of the partnership’s business and the persons who transact business with the partnership think the limited partner is the general partner.

A limited partner will not be liable for assessments in addition to its initial capital investment in any of a Trust Series’ shares. However, a limited partner may be required to repay to a Trust Series any amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to it under some circumstances. Under Delaware law, a Trust Series may not make a distribution to limited partners if the distribution causes a Trust Series’ liabilities (other than liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interests and nonrecourse liabilities) to exceed the fair value of a Trust Series’ assets. Delaware law provides that a limited partner who receives such a distribution and knew at the time of the distribution that the distribution violated the law will be liable to the limited partnership for the amount of the distribution for three years from the date of the distribution.

SummerHaven is leanly staffed and relies heavily on key personnel to manage advisory activities.

SummerHaven is leanly staffed and relies heavily on key personnel to manage advisory activities. In providing trading advisory services to each Trust Series with respect to its Applicable Index, SummerHaven relies heavily on Messrs. Kurt Nelson and Ashraf Rizvi and Dr. K. Geert Rouwenhorst. Messrs.Mr. Nelson and Rizvi, and Dr. Rouwenhorst intend to allocate their time to managing the assets of each Trust Series in a manner that they deem appropriate. If such key personnel of SummerHaven were to leave or be unable to carry out their present responsibilities, it may have an adverse effect on the management of SummerHaven.

TheUSCF’s LLC Agreement provides limited authority to the Non-Management Directors, and any Director of USCF may be removed by USCF’s parent company, which is wholly owned by Concierge,The Marygold Companies, Inc., a controlled public company where the majority of shares are owned by Nicholas D. Gerber along with certain of his other family members and certain other shareholders.

USCF’s Board of Directors currently consists of four Management Directors, each of whomwho are also executive officers or employees of USCF, and three Non-Management Directors, each of whomwho are considered independent for purposes of applicable NYSE Arca and SEC rules. Under USCF’s LLC Agreement, the Non-Management Directors have only such authority as the Management Directors expressly confer upon them, which means that the Non-Management Directors may have less authority to control the actions of the Management Directors than is typically the case with the independent members of a company’s Board of Directors. In addition, any Director may be removed by written consent of USCF Investments, Inc. (“USCF Investments”), formerly Wainwright Holdings, Inc. (“Wainwright”), which is the sole member of USCF. The sole shareholder of WainwrightUSCF Investments is The Marygold Companies, Inc., formerly Concierge Technologies, Inc. (“Marygold”), a company publicly traded under the ticker symbol “CNCG” (“Concierge”).“MGLD.” Mr. Nicholas D. Gerber, along with certain otherof his family members and certain other shareholders, owns the majority of the shares in Concierge,Marygold, which is the sole shareholder of Wainwright,USCF Investments, the sole member of USCF. Accordingly, although USCF is governed by the USCF Board of Directors, which consists of both Management Directors and Non-Management Directors, pursuant to the LLC Agreement, it is possible for Mr. Gerber to exercise his indirect control of WainwrightUSCF Investments to effect the removal of any Director (including the Non-Management Directors which comprise the Audit Committee) and to replace that Director with another Director. Having control in one person could have a negative impact on USCF and each Trust Series, including their regulatory obligations.

There is a risk that a Trust Series will not earn trading gains sufficient to compensate for the fees and expenses that it must pay and as such a Trust Series may not earn any profit.

Each Trust Series pays brokerage charges of approximately 0.10% of average total net assets based on brokerage fees of $3.50$3.00 per buy or sell, management fees of 0.95%0.65% of NAV on its average net assets (beforein the case of CPER and 0.80% in the case of USCI (in each case, before any applicable voluntary or contractual expense waivers), and OTC spreads and extraordinary expenses (e.g.(e.g., subsequent offering expenses, other expenses not in the ordinary course of business, including the indemnification of any person against liabilities and obligations to the extent permitted by law and required under the Trust Agreement and under agreements entered into by USCF on each Trust Series’ behalf and the bringing and defending of actions at law or in equity and otherwise engaging in the conduct of litigation and the incurring of legal expenses and the settlement of claims and litigation) that cannot be quantified.


These fees and expenses must be paid in all cases regardless of whether each Trust Series’ activities are profitable. Accordingly, each Trust Series must earn trading gains sufficient to compensate for these fees and expenses before it can earn any profit.

49

Each Trust Series is subject to extensive regulatory reporting and compliance.

Each Trust Series is subject to a comprehensive scheme of regulation under the federal commodities and securities laws. Each Trust Series could be subject to sanctions for a failure to comply with those requirements, which could adversely affect its financial performance (in the case of financial penalties) or ability to pursue its investment objective (in the case of a limitation on its ability to trade).

Because each Trust Series’ shares are publicly traded, a Trust Series is subject to certain rules and regulations of federal, state and financial market exchange entities charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded. These entities include the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”), the SEC, the CFTC, the NFA and NYSE Arca and these authorities have continued to develop additional regulations or interpretations of existing regulations. Each Trust Series is in ongoing efforts to comply with these regulations and interpretations have resulted in, and are likely to continue resulting in, a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance related activities.

Each Trust Series is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Each Trust Series’ internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to its management regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective may provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Fewer representative commodities may result in greater Applicable Index volatility.

Each Applicable Index is concentrated in terms of the number of commodities represented. Investors should be aware that other commodities indices are more diversified in terms of both the number and variety of commodities included. Concentration in fewer commodities may result in a greater degree of volatility in an Applicable Index and the NAV of a Trust Series which tracks an Applicable Index under specific market conditions and over time.

RegulationRegulatory changes or actions, including the implementation of the commodity interests and energy marketsnew legislation is extensive and constantly changing; future regulatory developments are impossible to predict but may significantly and adversely affect a Trust Series.

The futures markets are subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations, and margin requirements. In addition, the CFTC and futures exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of a market emergency, including, for example, the retroactive implementation of speculative position limits or higher margin requirements, the establishment of daily price limits and the suspension of trading. Regulation of commodity interest transactions in the United States is a rapidly changing area of law and is subject to ongoing modification by governmental and judicial action. Considerable regulatory attention has been focused on non-traditional investment pools that are publicly distributed in the United States. In addition, the SEC, CFTC and the exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of a market emergency, including, for example, the retroactive implementation of speculative position limits or higher margin requirements, the establishment of daily price limits and the suspension of trading. Further, various national governments outside of the United States have expressed concern regarding the disruptive effects of speculative trading in the energycommodities markets and the need to regulate the derivatives markets in general. The effect of any future regulatory change on a Trust Series is impossible to predict, but it could be substantial and adverse. For a more detailed discussion of the regulations to be imposed by the CFTC and the SEC and the potential impacts thereof on a Trust Series, please see“Item “Item 1. Business – Commodities Regulation” in this annualAnnual report on Form 10-K.

An investment in a Trust Series may provide little or no diversification benefits. Thus, in a declining market, a Trust Series may have no gains to offset losses from other investments, and an investor may suffer losses on an investment in such Trust Series while incurring losses with respect to other asset classes.

Historically, Futures Contracts and Other Commodity-Related Investments have generally been non-correlated to the performance of other asset classes such as stocks and bonds. Non-correlation means that there is a low statistically valid relationship between the performance of futures and other commodity interest transactions, on the one hand, and stocks or bonds, on the other hand.

However, there can be no assurance that such non-correlation will continue during future periods. If, contrary to historic patterns, a Trust Series’ performance were to move in the same general direction as the financial markets, investors will obtain little or no diversification benefits from an investment in such Trust Series’ shares. In such a case, a Trust Series may have no gains to offset losses from other investments, and investors may suffer losses on their investment in such Trust Series at the same time they incur losses with respect to other investments.

Variables such as drought, floods, weather, embargoes, tariffs and other political events may have a larger impact on commodity prices and commodity-linked instruments, including Futures Contracts and Other Commodity-Related Investments, than on traditional securities. These additional variables may create additional investment risks that subject a Trust Series’ investments to greater volatility than investments in traditional securities.

Non-correlation should not be confused with negative correlation, where the performance of two asset classes would be opposite of each other. There is no historical evidence that the spot price of a commodity and prices of other financial assets, such as stocks and bonds, are negatively correlated. In the absence of negative correlation, a Trust Series cannot be expected to be automatically profitable during unfavorable periods for the stock market, or vice versa.

The Trust is not a registered investment company, so shareholders do not have the protections of the 1940 Act.

The Trust is not an investment company subject to the 1940 Act. Accordingly, investors do not have the protections afforded by that statute, which, for example, requires investment companies to have a majority of disinterested directors and regulates the relationship between the investment company and its investment manager.

Trading in international markets could expose a Trust Series to credit and regulatory risk.

Each Trust Series invests primarily in Futures Contracts, a significant portion of which are traded on United States exchanges, including the NYMEX. However, a portion of a Trust Series’ trades may take place on markets and exchanges outside the United States. Some non-U.S. markets present risks because they are not subject to the same degree of regulation as their U.S. counterparts. Trading on such non-U.S. markets or exchanges presents risks because they are not subject to the same degree of regulation as their U.S. counterparts, including potentially different or diminished investor protections. In trading contracts denominated in currencies other

50

than U.S. dollars, a Trust Series is subject to the risk of adverse exchange-rate movements between the dollar and the functional currencies of such contracts. Additionally, trading on non-U.S. exchanges is subject to the risks presented by exchange controls, expropriation, increased tax burdens and exposure to local economic declines and political instability. An adverse development with respect to any of these variables could reduce the profit or increase the loss earned on trades in the affected international markets.

43 

Each Trust Series and USCF may have conflicts of interest, which may permit them to favor their own interests to the detriment of shareholders.

Each Trust Series is subject to actual and potential inherent conflicts involving USCF, various commodity futures brokers and any Authorized Participants. USCF’s officers, directors and employees do not devote their time exclusively to a Trust Series and also are directors, officers or employees of other entities that may compete with each Trust Series for their services. They could have a conflict between their responsibilities to a Trust Series and to those other entities. As a result of these and other relationships, parties involved with a Trust Series have a financial incentive to act in a manner other than in the best interests of such Trust Series and the shareholders. USCF has not established any formal procedure to resolve conflicts of interest. Consequently, investors are dependent on the good faith of the respective parties subject to such conflicts of interest to resolve them equitably. Although USCF attempts to monitor these conflicts, it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, for USCF to ensure that these conflicts do not, in fact, result in adverse consequences to the shareholders.

A Trust Series may also be subject to certain conflicts with respect to the FCM,its FCMs, including, but not limited to, conflicts that result from the FCM receiving greater amounts of compensation from other clients, or purchasing opposite or competing positions on behalf of third partythird-party accounts traded through the FCM.FCMs. In addition, USCF’s principals, officers, directors or employees may trade futures and related contracts for their own account. A conflict of interest may exist if their trades are in the same markets and at the same time as a Trust Series trades using the clearing broker to be used by such Trust Series. A potential conflict also may occur if USCF’s principals, officers, directors or employees trade their accounts more aggressively or take positions in their accounts which are opposite, or ahead of, the positions taken by a Trust Series.

The Trust Series, USCF and SummerHaven may have conflicts of interest, which may cause them to favor their own interests to the detriment of shareholders.

The Trust Series, USCF and SummerHaven may have inherent conflicts to the extent USCF and SummerHaven attempt to maintain each Trust Series’ asset size in order to preserve its fee income and this may not always be consistent with such Trust Series’ objective of having the value of its shares’ NAV track changes in the value of an Applicable Index.

USCF’s and SummerHaven’s officers, directors and employees do not devote their time exclusively to each Trust Series. For example, USCF’s directors, officers and employees act in such capacity for other entities, including the Related Public Funds that may compete with each Trust Series for their services. They could have a conflict between their responsibilities to each Trust Series and to the Related Public Funds.

USCF has sole current authority to manage the investments and operations of each Trust Series. It has delegated management of each Trust Series’ investments in its Applicable Interests to its commodity trading advisor, SummerHaven. This authority to manage the investments and operations of each Trust Series may allow either USCF or SummerHaven to act in a way that furthers its own interests in conflict with the best interests of investors. Shareholders have very limited voting rights, which will limit the ability to influence matters such as amending the Trust Agreement, changing a Trust Series’ basic investment objective, dissolving a Trust Series, or selling or distributing a Trust Series’ assets.

Shareholders have only very limited voting rights and have the power to replace USCF only under specific circumstances. Shareholders do not participate in the management of a Trust Series and do not control USCF, so they do not have any influence over basic matters that affect each Trust Series. In addition, each Trust Series could terminate at any time and cause the liquidation and potential loss of an investment and could upset the overall maturity and timing of an investment portfolio.

Shareholders have very limited voting rights with respect to each Trust Series’ affairs.affairs and have none of the statutory rights normally associated with the ownership of shares of a corporation (including, for example, the right to bring “oppression” or “derivative” actions). Shareholders may elect a replacement sponsor only if USCF resigns voluntarily or loses its corporate charter. Shareholders are not permitted to participate in the management or control of any Trust Series or the conduct of its business. Shareholders must therefore rely upon the duties and judgment of USCF to manage each Trust Series’ affairs.

51


A Trust Series could terminate at any time and cause the liquidation and potential loss of an investor’s investment and could upset the overall maturity and timing of an investor’s investment portfolio.

A Trust Series couldmay terminate at any time, regardless of whether that Trust Series has incurred losses, subject to the terms of the Trust Agreement. In particular, unforeseen circumstances, including but not limited to the death, adjudication of incompetence, bankruptcy, dissolution, withdrawal, or removal of USCF as the sponsor of the Trust could cause the Trust Series to terminate unless a successor is appointed in accordance with the Trust Agreement. Circumstances that could cause the sponsor to resign include, but are not limited to, if USCF determines market conditions, regulatory requirements, risk mitigation measures taken by a Trust Series, third parties or otherwise that would lead the Trust Series to determine that it could no longer foreseeably meet its investment objective or that the Trust Series’ aggregate net assets in relation to its operating expenses or its margin or collateral requirements make the continued operation of the Trust Series unreasonable or imprudent. In addition, USCF may terminate a Trust Series if it determines that the Trust Series’ aggregate net assets in relation to its operating expenses make the continued operation of the Trust Series unreasonable or imprudent. However, no level of losses will require USCF to terminate a Trust Series. A Trust Series’ termination would cause the liquidation of its assets and potential lossthe distribution of an investor’s investment.the proceeds thereof, first to creditors and then to shareholders in accordance with their positive book capital account balances, after giving effect to all contributions, distributions and allocations for all periods, and the Trust Series could incur losses in liquidating its assets in connection with a termination. Termination could also negatively affect the overall maturity and timing of an investor’s investment portfolio.

The Trust Series do not expect to make cash distributions.

No Trust Series has previously made any cash distributions and intends to reinvest any realized gains in additional Commodity Interests rather than distributing cash to limited partners.shareholders. Therefore, unlike mutual funds, commodity pools or other investment pools that actively manage their investments in an attempt to realize income and gains from their investing activities and distribute such income and gains to their investors, a Trust Series generally does not expect to distribute cash. An investor should not invest in a Trust Series if the investor will need cash distributions from the Trust Series to pay taxes on its share of income and gains of a Trust Series, if any, or for any other reason. Nonetheless, although a Trust Series does not intend to make cash distributions, the income earned from its investments held directly or posted as margin may reach levels that merit distribution,e.g., at levels where such income is not necessary to support its underlying investments in Commodity Interests and investors adversely react to being taxed on such income without receiving distributions that could be used to pay such tax. If this income becomes significant then cash distributions may be made.

An unanticipated number of redemptionRedemption Basket requests during a short period of time could have an adverse effect on a Trust Series’ NAV.

If a substantial number of requests for redemption of Redemption Baskets are received by a Trust Series during a relatively short period of time, such Trust Series may not be able to satisfy the requests from the Trust Series assets not committed to trading. As a consequence, it could be necessary to liquidate positions in a Trust Series’ trading positions before the time that the trading strategies would otherwise dictate liquidation.

The suspension in the ability of Authorized Participants to purchase Creation Baskets could cause a Trust Series’ NAV to differ materially from its trading price.

Money Market ReformIn the event that there was a suspension in the ability of Authorized Participants to purchase additional Creation Baskets, Authorized Participants and other groups that make a market in shares of a Trust Series would likely still continue to actively trade the shares. However, in such a situation, Authorized Participants and other market makers may seek to adjust the market they make in the shares. Specifically, such market participants may increase the spread between the prices that they quote for offers to buy and sell shares to allow them to adjust to the potential uncertainty as to when they might be able to purchase additional Creation Baskets of shares. In addition, Authorized Participants may be less willing to offer to quote offers to buy or sell shares in large numbers. The potential impact of either wider spreads between bid and offer prices, or reduced number of shares on which quotes may be available, could increase the trading costs to investors in the Trust Series compared to the quotes and the number of shares on which bids and offers are made if the Authorized Participants still were able to freely create new baskets of shares. In addition, there could be a significant variation between the market price at which shares are traded and the shares’ NAV, which is also the price shares can be redeemed with the Trust Series by Authorized Participants in Redemption Baskets. The foregoing could also create significant deviations from the Trust Series’ investment objective. Any potential impact to the market for shares of the Trust Series that could occur from the Authorized Participant’s inability to create new baskets would likely not extend beyond the time when additional shares would be registered and available for distribution.

52

A Trust Series may determine that, to allow it to reinvest the proceeds from sales of its Creation Baskets in currently permitted assets in a manner that meets its investment objective, it may limit its offers of Creation Baskets.

A Trust Series may determine to limit the issuance of its shares through the offering of Creation Baskets to its Authorized Participants. As a result of certain circumstances described herein, including (1) the need to comply with regulatory requirements (including, but not limited to, exchange accountability levels and position limits); (2) market conditions (including but not limited to those allowing USCI to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing); and (3) risk mitigation measures taken by the Trust Series’ current and other FCMs that limit the Trust Series and other market participants from investing in particular commodity futures contracts, a Trust Series’ management can determine that it will limit the issuance of shares and the offerings of Creation Baskets because it is unable to invest the proceeds from such offerings in investments that would permit it to reasonably meet its investment objective.

If such a determination is made, the same consequences associated with a suspension of the offering of Creation Baskets, as described in the foregoing risk factor, “The suspension in the ability of Authorized Participants to purchase Creation Baskets could cause a Trust Series’ NAV to differ materially from its trading price,” could also occur as a result of a Trust Series determining to limit the offering of creation baskets.

In a rising rate environment, the Trust Series may not be able to fully invest at prevailing rates until any current investments in Treasury Bills mature in order to avoid selling those investments at a loss.

When interest rates rise, the value of fixed income securities typically falls. In a rising interest rate environment, a Trust Series may not be able to fully invest at prevailing rates until any current investments in Treasury Bills mature in order to avoid selling those investments at a loss. Interest rate risk is generally lower for shorter term investments and higher for longer term investments. The risk to the Trust Series of rising interest rates may be greater in the future due to the end of a long period of historically low rates, the effect of potential monetary policy initiatives, including actions taken by the U.S. Federal Reserve and other foreign equivalents to curb inflation, and resulting market reactions to those initiatives. When interest rates fall, the Trust Series may be required to reinvest the proceeds from the sale, redemption or early prepayment of a Treasury Bill or money market security at a lower interest rate.

A Trust Series may potentially lose money by investing in government money market funds.

The SEC adopted amendments to Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which became effectiveTrust Series invests in 2016, to reformgovernment money market funds. Although such government money market funds (“MMFs”). Whileseek to preserve the new rule applies onlyvalue of an investment at $1.00 per share, there is no guarantee that they will be able to MMFs, itdo so and a Trust Series may indirectly affect institutional investors such as the Trust. A portion of the Trust’s assets that are not used for margin or collateral in the Futures Contracts currently are invested in government MMFs. The Trust does not hold any non-government MMFs and, particularly in light of recent changes to the rule governing the operation of MMFs, does not anticipate investing in any non-government MMFs. However, if the Trust invests in other types of MMFs besides government MMFs in the future, the Trust could be negatively impactedlose money by investing in a government money market fund. An investment in a government money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), or any other government agency. The share price of a government money market fund can fall below the $1.00 share price. No Trust Series can rely on or expect a government money market fund’s adviser or its affiliates to enter into support agreements or take other actions to maintain the government money market fund’s $1.00 share price. The credit quality of a government money market fund’s holdings can change rapidly in certain markets, and the default of a single holding could have an MMF that does not maintainadverse impact on the government money market fund’s share price. Due to fluctuations in interest rates, the market value of securities held by a stable $1.00 NAV government money market fund may vary. A government money market fund’s share price can also be negatively affected during periods of high redemption pressures and/or that has the potential to impose redemption fees and gates (temporary suspension of redemptions).illiquid markets.

The failure or bankruptcy of a clearing broker could result in a substantial loss of the Trust Series’ assets and could impair the Trust Series in its ability to execute trades.

The CEA and CFTC regulations impose several requirements on FCMs and clearing houses that are designed to protect customers, including mandating the implementation of risk management programs, internal monitoring and controls, capital and liquidity standards, customer disclosures, and auditing and examination programs. In particular, the CEA and CFTC regulations require FCMs and clearing houses to segregate all funds received from customers from proprietary assets. There can be no assurance that the requirements imposed by the CEA and CFTC regulations will prevent losses to, or not materially adversely affect, the Trust Series or its investors.

In particular, in the event of thean FCM’s or clearing house’s bankruptcy, of a clearing broker or an Exchange’s clearing house, athe Trust Series could be exposedlimited to recovering either a riskpro rata share of all available funds segregated on behalf of the FCM’s combined customer accounts or the Trust Series may not recover any assets at all. The Trust Series may also incur a loss with respect toof any unrealized profits on its assets that are posted as margin. Ifopen and closed positions. This is because if such a bankruptcy were to occur, the Trust Series would be afforded the protections granted to customers of an FCM, and participants to transactions cleared through a clearing house, under the United States Bankruptcy Code and applicable CFTC regulations. Such

53

provisions generally provide for a pro rata distribution to customers of customer property held by the bankrupt FCM or an Exchange’s clearing house if the customer property held by the FCM or the Exchange’s clearing house is insufficient to satisfy all customer claims. In any case, there can be no assurance that these protections will be effective in allowing the Trust Series to recover all, or even any, of the amounts it has deposited as margin.

Bankruptcy of a clearing FCM can be caused by, among other things, the default of one of the FCM’s customers. In this event, the Exchange’s clearing house is permitted to use the entire amount of margin posted by thea Trust Series (as well as margin posted by other customers of the FCM) to cover the amounts owed by the bankrupt FCM. Consequently, the Trust Series could be unable to recover amounts due to it on its futures positions, including assets posted as margin, and could sustain substantial losses.

CFTC regulations impose several requirements on FCMs that are designed to protect customers, including mandating certain customer protections and the implementation of risk management programs, internal monitoring and controls, capital and liquidity standards, customer disclosures, and auditing and examination programs. There can be no assurance these regulations will prevent losses to, or not materially adversely affect, the Trust Series or the Shareholders.

Notwithstanding that athe Trust Series could sustain losses upon the failure or bankruptcy of its FCM, the majority of a Trust Series’ assets are held in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents with the Custodian and would not be impacted by the bankruptcy of an FCM.

45 

The failure or bankruptcy of the Trust Series’ Custodian could result in a substantial loss of the Trust Series’ assets.

The majority of a Trust Series’ assets are held in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents with the Custodian. The insolvency of the Custodian could result in a complete loss of a Trust Series’ assets held by that Custodian, which, at any given time, would likely comprise a substantial portion of such Trust Series’ total assets.

The liability of SHIM and SummerHaven is limited, and the value of the shares may be adversely affected if USCF and any Trust Series are required to indemnify SHIM and/or SummerHaven.

Under the licensing agreement among SHIM, SummerHaven and USCF, and the advisory agreement between SummerHaven and USCF, neithernone of SHIM, SummerHaven and its affiliates, nor any of their respective officers, directors, shareholders, members, partners, employees and any person who controls SHIM or SummerHaven is liable to USCF or any Trust Series absent willful misconduct, gross negligence, bad faith, or material breaches of applicable law or the applicable agreement on the part of SHIM or SummerHaven. In addition, SHIM, SummerHaven and its officers, directors, shareholders, members, directors, officers, shareholders,partners, employees and any person who controls SHIM or SummerHaven or their representatives, agents, attorneys, service providers, successors and assigns have the right to be indemnified, defended and held harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities, obligations, judgments, causes of action, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) (collectively, “Losses”) in connection with or arising out of the licensing agreement or advisory agreement, unless such Losses result from any willful misconduct, gross negligence or bad faith on the part of SHIM, SummerHaven, or a material breach by SummerHavenUSCF of applicable law or the applicable agreement. Furthermore, SHIM, SummerHaven will not be liable to USCF or any Trust Series for any indirect, incidental, special or consequential damages, even if SHIM, SummerHaven or an authorized representative of SHIM or SummerHaven has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

The liability of USCF and the Trustee are limited, and the value of the shares will be adversely affected if any Trust Series is required to indemnify the Trustee or USCF.

Under the Trust Agreement, the Trustee and USCF are not liable, and have the right to be indemnified, for any liability or expense incurred absent gross negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the Trustee or USCF or breach by USCF of the Trust Agreement, as the case may be. As a result, USCF may require the assets of any Trust Series to be sold in order to cover losses or liability suffered by it or by the Trustee. Any sale of that kind would reduce the NAV of such Trust Series and the value of its shares.

Although the shares of each Trust Series are limited liability investments, certain circumstances such as bankruptcy or indemnification of a Trust Series by a shareholder will increase the shareholder’s liability.

The shares of each Trust Series are limited liability investments; shareholders may not lose more than the amount that they invest plus any profits recognized on their investment. However, shareholders could be required, as a matter of bankruptcy law, to return to the estate of a Trust Series any distribution they received at a time when such Trust Series was in fact insolvent or in violation of its Trust Agreement. In addition, a number of states do not have “statutory trust” statutes such as the Delaware statutes under which the Trust has been formed in the State of Delaware. It is possible that a court in such state could hold that, due to the absence of any statutory provision to the contrary in such jurisdiction, the shareholders, although entitled under Delaware law to the same limitation on personal liability as stockholders in a private corporation for profit organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, are not so entitled in such state. Finally, in the event the Trust or any Trust Series is made a party to any claim, dispute, demand or litigation or otherwise incurs any liability or expense as a result of or in connection with any shareholder’s (or assignee’s) obligations or liabilities unrelated to the business of the Trust or such Trust Series, as applicable, such shareholder (or assignees cumulatively) is required under the Trust Agreement to indemnify the Trust or such Trust Series, as applicable, for all such liability and expense incurred, including attorneys’ and accountants’ fees.

54

Investors cannot be assured of the continuation of the agreement between SummerHaven and USCF for use of an Applicable Index, and discontinuance of an Applicable Index may be detrimental to a Trust Series.

Investors cannot be assured that the license agreement between SummerHavenSHIM and USCF for use of an Applicable Index will continue for any length of time. Should the agreement between SummerHavenSHIM and USCF for use of an Applicable Index be terminated, USCF will be required to find a replacement index, which may have an adverse affecteffect on a Trust Series.

Investors cannot be assured of SummerHaven’s continued services, and discontinuance may be detrimental to a Trust Series.

Investors cannot be assured that SummerHaven will be willing or able to continue to service each Trust Series for any length of time. SummerHaven was formed for the purpose of providing investment advisory services, and provides these services to each Trust Series on a contractual basis pursuant to a licensing agreement and an advisory agreement. If SummerHaven discontinues its activities on behalf of any Trust Series, such Trust Series may be adversely affected. If SummerHaven’s registration with the CFTC or membership in the NFA were revoked or suspended, SummerHaven would no longer be able to provide services to any Trust Series.

All of the Trust Series are series of the Trust and, as a result, a court could potentially conclude that the assets and liabilities of one Trust Series are not segregated from those of another Trust Series, thereby potentially exposing assets in one Trust Series to the liabilities of another Trust Series.Series.

Each Trust Series is a series of a Delaware Statutory Truststatutory trust and not itself a separate legal entity. The Delaware Statutory Trust Act provides that if certain provisions are included in the formation and governing documents of a statutory trust organized in series and if separate and distinct records are maintained for any series and the assets associated with that series are held in separate and distinct records and are accounted for in such separate and distinct records separately from the other assets of the statutory trust, or any series thereof, then the debts, liabilities, obligations and expenses incurred by a particular series are enforceable against the assets of such series only, and not against the assets of the statutory trust generally or any other series thereof. Conversely, none of the debts, liabilities, obligations and expenses incurred with respect to any other series thereof shall be enforceable against the assets of such series. USCF is not aware of any court case that has interpreted this Inter-Series Limitation on Liability or provided any guidance as to what is required for compliance. USCF intends to maintain separate and distinct records for each Trust Series and account for each Trust Series separately from any other series of the Trust, Series, but it is possible a court could conclude that the methods used do not satisfy the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, which would potentially expose assets in one series to the liabilities of another Trust Series.

The Trust Agreement limits the forum in which claims may be brought against USCF, the Trust, the Trustee or their respective directors and officers.

46 The rights of USCF, the Trust, the Trust Series, DTC (as registered owner of the Trust Series’ global certificate for shares) and the shareholders are governed by the laws of the State of Delaware. USCF, the Trust, the Trust Series and DTC and, by accepting shares, each DTC Participant and each shareholder, consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of Delaware and any federal courts located in Delaware other than for a person to assert a claim of Delaware jurisdiction over USCF, the Trust or the Trust Series. As a result, any claims, suits, actions or proceedings arising out of or relating in any way to the 1933 Act, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Trust, the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (the “Trust Act”), the Trust Agreement or asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs (or similar) doctrine including, without limitation, any claims, suits, actions or proceedings to interpret, apply or enforce (i) the provisions of the Trust Agreement, or (ii) the duties (including fiduciary duties), obligations or liabilities of the Trust to USCF, the shareholders or the Trustee, or of USCF or the Trustee to the Trust, to the shareholders or each other, or (iii) the rights or powers of, or restrictions on, the Trust, the Trustee or the shareholders, or (iv) any provision of the Trust Act or other laws of the State of Delaware pertaining to trusts made applicable to the Trust pursuant to the Trust Act, or (v) any other instrument, document, agreement or certificate contemplated by any provision of the Trust Act or the Trust Agreement relating in any way to the Trust, shall be exclusively brought in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or, if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction thereof, any other court in the State of Delaware with subject matter jurisdiction.

We believe this provision benefits us and the shareholders: (1) by having disputes resolved by a forum with the experience and established precedent for resolving these types of disputes under Delaware law, (2) by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law in the types of lawsuits to which it applies, and, (3) as a result of the foregoing, limiting the time cost and uncertainty of litigation. However, this provision may limit the right of a Trust Series’ shareholders to bring a claim in a judicial forum they believe is more favorable for its disputes against USCF, the Trust, or the Trustee. In addition, it may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against USCF, the Trust, the Trustee, or their respective directors and officers. Although the Trust Agreement contains the exclusive choice of forum provision described above and such provisions are expressly permitted under the Trust Act, there are no court cases that

55

we are aware of that have interpreted the Trust Act in this regard and thus, it is possible that a court could rule that such a provision is inapplicable for a particular claim or action or that such provision is unenforceable. With the validity and enforceability of exclusive forum selection provisions still somewhat in question outside of the State of Delaware, there may be increased litigation over such provisions. Challenging shareholders might bring actions in courts outside of Delaware to attack a forum selection clause that specifies Delaware as the exclusive jurisdiction. A non-Delaware court could view negatively a forum selection clause in favor of Delaware, in particular, because such a provision may appear to divest the non-Delaware court of its legal jurisdiction.

Section 27 of the Exchange Act vests exclusive federal jurisdiction for all claims brought to enforce any duty or liability created under the Exchange Act. Therefore, any exclusive forum selection clauses will not apply to any such claim. In addition, Section 22 of the 1933 Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the 1933 Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. As a result, there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce an exclusive forum selection clause in connection with claims arising under the 1933 Act and/or the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder, and in any event, stockholders will not be deemed to have waived the Company’s compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

USCF and the Trustee are not obligated to prosecute any action, suit or other proceeding in respect of any Trust Series property.

Neither USCF nor the Trustee is obligated to, although each may in its respective discretion, prosecute any action, suit or other proceeding in respect of any Trust Series property. The Trust Agreement does not confer upon shareholders the right to prosecute any such action, suit or other proceeding.

Third parties may infringe upon or otherwise violate intellectual property rights or assert that USCF has infringed or otherwise violated their intellectual property rights, which may result in significant costs and diverted attention.

It is possible that third parties might utilize a Trust Series’ intellectual property or technology, including the use of its business methods, trademarks and trading program software, without permission. USCF has a patent for each Trust Series’ business method and has registered its trademarks. The Trust Series do not currently have any proprietary software. However, if it obtains proprietary software in the future, any unauthorized use of a Trust Series’ proprietary software and other technology could also adversely affect its competitive advantage. The Trust Series may not have adequate resources to implement procedures for monitoring unauthorized uses of its patents, trademarks, proprietary software and other technology. Also, third parties may independently develop business methods, trademarks or proprietary software and other technology similar to that of USCF or claim that USCF has violated their intellectual property rights, including their copyrights, trademark rights, trade names, trade secrets and patent rights. As a result, USCF may have to litigate in the future to protect its trade secrets, determine the validity and scope of other parties’ proprietary rights, defend itself against claims that it has infringed or otherwise violated other parties’ rights, or defend itself against claims that its rights are invalid. Any litigation of this type, even if USCF is successful and regardless of the merits, may result in significant costs, divert its resources from the Trust Series, or require it to change its proprietary software and other technology or enter into royalty or licensing agreements.

Due to the increased use of technologies, intentional and unintentional cyber-attacks pose operational and information security risks.

With the increased use of technologies such as the Internetinternet and the dependence on computer systems to perform necessary business functions, the Funds are susceptible to operational and information security risks. In general, cyber incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events.events such as a cyber-attack against Fund, a natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, failure of the Trust’s disaster recovery systems, or consequential employee error. Cyber-attacks include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. Cyber-attacks may also be carried out in a manner that does not require gaining unauthorized access, such as causing denial-of-service attacks on websites. Cyber security failures or breaches of a Fund’s clearing broker or third party service provider (including, but not limited to, index providers, the administrator and transfer agent, the custodian), have the ability to cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses, the inability of Fund shareholders to transact business, violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, and/or additional compliance costs. Adverse effects can become particularly acute if those events affect Fund’s electronic data processing, transmission, storage, and retrieval systems, or impact the availability, integrity, or confidentiality of our data.

In addition, a service provider that has experienced a cyber-security incident may divert resources normally devoted to servicing a Trust Series to addressing the incident, which would be likely to have an adverse effect on a Trust Series’ operations. Cyber-attacks may also cause disruptions to the futures exchanges and clearinghouses through which a Trust Series invests in futures contracts, which could result in disruptions to a Trust Series’ ability to pursue its investment objective, resulting in financial losses to a Trust Series and its shareholders.

In addition, substantial costs may be incurred in order to prevent any cyber incidents in the future. The FundsA Trust Series and theirits shareholders could be negatively impacted as a result. While USCF and the Related Public Funds, including a Trust Series, have established business continuity plans, there are inherent limitations in such plans.plans, including the possibility that certain risks have not been identified or that new risks will emerge before countervailing measures can be implemented. Furthermore, a Trust Series cannot control cybersecurity plans and systems of its service providers, market makers or Authorized Participants.

A Trust Series’ investment returns could be negatively affected by climate change and greenhouse gas restrictions.

Driven by concern over the risks of climate change, a number of countries have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, regulatory frameworks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or production and use of oil and gas. These include adoption of cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, trade tariffs, minimum renewable usage requirements, restrictive permitting, increased efficiency standards, and incentives or mandates for renewable energy. Political and other actors and their agents increasingly seek to advance climate change objectives indirectly, such as by seeking to reduce the availability of or increase the cost for, financial and investment in the oil and gas sector and taking actions intended to promote changes in business strategy for oil and gas companies. Many governments are also providing tax

56

advantages and other subsidies to support transitioning to alternative energy sources or mandating the use of specific fuels other than oil or natural gas. Depending on how policies are formulated and applied, they could have the potential to negatively affect a Trust Series’ investment returns and make oil and natural gas products more expensive or less competitive.

USCF is the subject of class action, derivative, and other litigation. In light of the inherent uncertainties involved in litigation matters, an adverse outcome in this litigation could materially adversely affect USCF’s financial condition.

USCF and USCF’s directors and certain of its officers are currently subject to litigation. Estimating an amount or range of possible losses resulting from litigation proceedings to USCF is inherently difficult and requires an extensive degree of judgment, particularly where the matters involve indeterminate claims for monetary damages and are subject to appeal. In addition, because most legal proceedings are resolved over extended periods of time, potential losses are subject to change due to, among other things, new developments, changes in legal strategy, the outcome of intermediate procedural and substantive rulings and other parties’ settlement posture and their evaluation of the strength or weakness of their case against USCF. For these reasons, we are currently unable to predict the ultimate timing or outcome of, or reasonably estimate the possible losses or a range of possible losses resulting therefrom. In light of the inherent uncertainties involved in such matters, an adverse outcome in this litigation could materially adversely affect USCF’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in any particular reporting period. In addition, litigation could result in substantial costs and divert USCF’s management’s attention and resources from conducting USCF’s operations, including the management of the Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. For more information, see “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

In general, cybersecurity incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events such as a cyber-attack against USCF, a natural catastrophe, an industrial accident, failure of the Trust’s disaster recovery systems, or consequential employee error. Cyber-attacks include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. Cyber-attacks may also be carried out in a manner that does not require gaining unauthorized access, such as causing denial-of-service attacks on websites. Cyber security failures or breaches of a fund’s clearing broker or third party service provider (including, but not limited to, index providers, the administrator and transfer agent, the custodian), have the ability to cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses, the inability of fund shareholders to transact business, violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, and/or additional compliance costs.

Risk Management

The Trust does not have computer systems or networks. Pursuant to the terms of the Trust Agreement, the Trust’s affairs are managed by USCF. USCF has implemented an information security program that is focused on ensuring the security and protection of computer systems and oversight of third-party service providers. This program includes specific provisions pertaining to data security and the security of information that, if disclosed, could have detrimental effects on the Trust, USCI and CPER. Such provisions relate to the handling of information and computers, as well as the protection of computer systems and software from unauthorized persons. As needed, but no less frequently than annually, USCF evaluates its cybersecurity risk profile in accordance with its compliance policies and procedures. The risk assessment aims to confirm that USCF’s policies are being followed and enforced, and to identify risks that may have otherwise been unknown.  To mitigate the risks from cybersecurity threats posed by third parties, USCF conducts due diligence on its critical third-party service providers with respect to (1) the cybersecurity programs and policies that they have in place as well as how they safeguard sensitive information, and (2) how those programs and policies apply to customers, including USCF and the Trust.

USCF’s procedures include guidance for determining the materiality of cybersecurity incidents, including with respect to cybersecurity incidents experienced by third-party service providers. Such determinations are made by USCF’s senior management, including its Chief Executive Officer, which uses both qualitative and quantitative factors in assessing the material impact of an incident. The factors include the functional impact, the information impact, costs, the observed activity, the location of observed activity, actor characterization, and recoverability of information. As of the date of this report, USCF is not aware of any material risks from cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Trust Series, including its business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition.

57

Governance

The Director of Compliance, as identified below, provides regular reports to USCF’s Board of Directors on developments to the information security and cybersecurity risks facing the Trust. Reports may include, among other things, an overview of the controls and procedures related to assessing, identifying, and managing risks related to cybersecurity threats, oversight of third-party service providers and related cybersecurity threats, and management’s evaluation of cybersecurity risks material to the Trust.

Item 2. Properties.

Not applicable.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.Proceedings.

Although eachFrom time to time, a Trust Series may be involved in legal proceedings arising primarily from the ordinary course of its business. None of the Trust Series is currently party to any material legal proceedings. In addition, USCF, as sponsor of the Trust and general partner of the Related Public Funds may, from time to time, be involved in litigation arising out of its operations in the normalordinary course of its business. Except as described herein, neither Trust Series nor USCF is currently party to any material legal proceedings.

Optimum Strategies Action

On April 6, 2022, USO and USCF were named as defendants in an action filed by Optimum Strategies Fund I, LP, a purported investor in call option contracts on USO (the “Optimum Strategies Action”). The action was in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut at Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00511.

The Optimum Strategies Action asserted claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”), Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act (“CUSA”). It purported to challenge statements in registration statements that became effective in February 2020, March 2020, and on April 20, 2020, as well as public statements between February 2020 and May 2020, in connection with certain extraordinary market conditions and the attendant risks that caused the demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The complaint was seeking damages, interest, costs, attorney’s fees, and equitable relief.

On March 15, 2023, the court granted the USO defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. In its ruling, the court granted the USO defendants’ motion to dismiss, with prejudice, the plaintiff’s claims under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and a claim for control person liability under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. Having dismissed all claims over which the court had original jurisdiction, the court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claim under CUSA and dismissed the claim without prejudice. No notice of appeal was filed.

Settlement of SEC and CFTC Investigations

On November 8, 2021, USCF and USO announced a resolution with each of the SEC and the CFTC relating to matters set forth in certain Wells Notices issued by the staffs of each of the SEC and CFTC as more fully described below.

On August 17, 2020, USCF, USO, and John Love received a “Wells Notice” from the staff of the SEC (the “SEC Wells Notice”). The SEC Wells Notice stated that the SEC staff made a preliminary determination to recommend that the SEC file an enforcement action against USCF, USO, and Mr. Love alleging violations of Sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”), and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

Subsequently, on August 19, 2020, USCF, USO, and Mr. Love received a Wells Notice from the staff of the CFTC (the “CFTC Wells Notice”). The CFTC Wells Notice stated that the CFTC staff made a preliminary determination to recommend that the CFTC file an enforcement action against USCF, USO, and Mr. Love alleging violations of Sections 4o(1)(A) and (B) and 6(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936, as amended (the “CEA”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 6o(1)(A) and (B) and 9(1) (2018), and CFTC Regulations 4.26, 4.41, and 180.1(a), 17 C.F.R. §§ 4.26, 4.41, 180.1(a) (2019).

On November 8, 2021, acting pursuant to an offer of settlement submitted by USCF and USO, the SEC issued an order instituting cease-and-desist proceedings, making findings, and imposing a cease-and-desist order pursuant to Section 8A of the 1933 Act, directing USCF and USO to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of Section 17(a)(3) of the 1933 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)(3) (the “SEC Order”). In the SEC Order, the SEC made findings that, from April 24, 2020 to May 21, 2020, USCF and USO violated Section 17(a)(3) of 1933 Act, which provides that it is “unlawful for any person in the offer or sale of any securities to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or otherwise, nonewould operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.” USCF and USO consented to entry of the Trust SeriesSEC Order without admitting or denying the findings contained therein, except as to jurisdiction.

58

Separately, on November 8, 2021, acting pursuant to an offer of settlement submitted by USCF, the CFTC issued an order instituting cease-and-desist proceedings, making findings, and imposing a cease-and-desist order pursuant to Section 6(c) and (d) of the CEA, directing USCF to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of Section 4o(1)(B) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. § 6o(1) (B), and CFTC Regulation 4.41(a)(2), 17 C.F.R. § 4.41(a)(2) (the “CFTC Order”). In the CFTC Order, the CFTC made findings that, from on or about April 22, 2020 to June 12, 2020, USCF violated Section 4o(1)(B) of the CEA and CFTC Regulation 4.41(a)(2), which make it unlawful for any commodity pool operator (“CPO”) to engage in “any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or participant or prospective client or participant” and prohibit a CPO from advertising in a manner which “operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or participant or prospective client or participant,” respectively. USCF consented to entry of the CFTC Order without admitting or denying the findings contained therein, except as to jurisdiction.

Pursuant to the SEC Order and the CFTC Order, in addition to the command to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of Section 17(a)(3) of the 1933 Act, Section 4o(1)(B) of the CEA, and CFTC Regulation 4.14(a)(2), civil monetary penalties totaling two million five hundred thousand dollars ($2,500,000) in the aggregate were required to be paid to the SEC and CFTC, of which one million two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($1,250,000) was paid by USCF to each of the SEC and the CFTC, respectively, pursuant to the offsets permitted under the orders.

In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation

On June 19, 2020, USCF, USO, John P. Love, and Stuart P. Crumbaugh were named as defendants in a putative class action filed by purported shareholder Robert Lucas (the “Lucas Class Action”). The Court thereafter consolidated the Lucas Class Action with two related putative class actions filed on July 31, 2020 and August 13, 2020, and appointed a lead plaintiff. The consolidated class action is currentlypending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York under the caption In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-04740.

On November 30, 2020, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint (the “Amended Lucas Class Complaint”). The Amended Lucas Class Complaint asserts claims under the 1933 Act, the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint challenges statements in registration statements that became effective on February 25, 2020 and March 23, 2020 as well as subsequent public statements through April 2020 concerning certain extraordinary market conditions and the attendant risks that caused the demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint purports to have been brought by an investor in USO on behalf of a partyclass of similarly-situated shareholders who purchased USO securities between February 25, 2020 and April 28, 2020 and pursuant to anythe challenged registration statements. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint seeks to certify a class and to award the class compensatory damages at an amount to be determined at trial as well as costs and attorney’s fees. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint named as defendants USCF, USO, John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Nicholas D. Gerber, Andrew F Ngim, Robert L. Nguyen, Peter M. Robinson, Gordon L. Ellis, and Malcolm R. Fobes III, as well as the marketing agent, ALPS Distributors, Inc., and the Authorized Participants: ABN Amro, BNP Paribas Securities Corporation, Citadel Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman Sachs & Company, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corporation, Morgan Stanley & Company Inc., Nomura Securities International Inc., RBC Capital Markets LLC, SG Americas Securities LLC, UBS Securities LLC, and Virtu Financial BD LLC.

The lead plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of its claims against BNP Paribas Securities Corporation, Citadel Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Morgan Stanley & Company, Inc., Nomura Securities International, Inc., RBC Capital Markets, LLC, SG Americas Securities LLC, and UBS Securities LLC.

USCF, USO, and the individual defendants in In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation intend to vigorously contest such claims and have moved for their dismissal.

Wang Class Action

On July 10, 2020, purported shareholder Momo Wang filed a putative class action complaint, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, against defendants USO, USCF, John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Nicholas D. Gerber, Andrew F Ngim, Robert L. Nguyen, Peter M. Robinson, Gordon L. Ellis, Malcolm R. Fobes, III, ABN Amro, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Citadel Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman Sachs & Company, JP Morgan Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp., Morgan Stanley & Company Inc., Nomura Securities International Inc., RBC Capital Markets LLC, SG Americas Securities LLC, UBS Securities LLC, and Virtu Financial BD LLC, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California as Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-4596 (the “Wang Class Action”).

The Wang Class Action asserted federal securities claims under the 1933 Act, challenging disclosures in a March 19, 2020 registration statement. It alleged that the defendants failed to disclose to investors in USO certain extraordinary market conditions and the attendant

59

risks that caused the demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The Wang Class Action was voluntarily dismissed on August 4, 2020.

MehanAction

On August 10, 2020, purported shareholder Darshan Mehan filed a derivative action on behalf of nominal defendant USO, against defendants USCF, John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Nicholas D. Gerber, Andrew F Ngim, Robert L. Nguyen, Peter M. Robinson, Gordon L. Ellis, and Malcolm R. Fobes, III (the “Mehan Action”). The action is pending material legal proceedings.in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Alameda as Case No. RG20070732.

The Mehan Action alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to USO and failed to act in good faith in connection with a March 19, 2020 registration statement and offering and disclosures regarding certain extraordinary market conditions that caused demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The complaint seeks, on behalf of USO, compensatory damages, restitution, equitable relief, attorney’s fees, and costs. All proceedings in the Mehan Action are stayed pending disposition of the motion(s) to dismiss in In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation.

USCF, USO, and the other defendants intend to vigorously contest such claims.

In re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation

On August 27, 2020, purported shareholders Michael Cantrell and AML Pharm. Inc. DBA Golden International filed two separate derivative actions on behalf of nominal defendant USO, against defendants USCF, John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Andrew F Ngim, Gordon L. Ellis, Malcolm R. Fobes, III, Nicholas D. Gerber, Robert L. Nguyen, and Peter M. Robinson in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York at Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-06974 (the “Cantrell Action”) and Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-06981 (the “AML Action”), respectively.

The complaints in the Cantrell and AML Actions are nearly identical. They each allege violations of Sections 10(b), 20(a) and 21D of the Exchange Act, Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and common law claims of breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets. These allegations stem from USO’s disclosures and defendants’ alleged actions in light of the extraordinary market conditions in 2020 that caused demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The complaints seek, on behalf of USO, compensatory damages, restitution, equitable relief, attorney’s fees, and costs. The plaintiffs in the Cantrell and AML Actions have marked their actions as related to the Lucas Class Action.

The Court consolidated the Cantrell and AML Actions under the caption In re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-06974 and appointed co-lead counsel. All proceedings in In re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation are stayed pending disposition of the motion(s) to dismiss in In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation.

USCF, USO, and the other defendants intend to vigorously contest the claims in In re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

47 

60

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Price Range of Shares

USCI’s shares have traded on the NYSE Arca under the symbol “USCI” since August 10, 2010. CPER’s shares have traded on the NYSE Arca under the symbol “CPER” since November 15, 2011. USAG’s shares have traded on the NYSE Arca under the symbol “USAG” since April 13, 2012. The following tables set forth the range of reported high and low sales prices of the shares as reported on the NYSE Arca for the periods indicated below for each of USCI, CPER and USAG.

USCI

  High  Low 
Fiscal year 2017        
First quarter $40.89  $38.57 
Second quarter $39.35  $37.04 
Third quarter $41.06  $37.93 
Fourth quarter $42.53  $39.82 

  High  Low 
Fiscal year 2016        
First quarter $41.55  $38.46 
Second quarter $43.76  $39.75 
Third quarter $43.52  $40.98 
Fourth quarter $42.17  $40.00 

As of December 31, 2017,2023, USCI had approximately 57,23518,300 holders of shares.

CPER

  High  Low 
Fiscal year 2017        
First quarter $18.26  $16.24 
Second quarter $17.51  $16.10 
Third quarter $20.21  $17.05 
Fourth quarter $21.16  $18.88 

  High  Low 
Fiscal year 2016        
First quarter $15.33  $12.97 
Second quarter $15.06  $13.48 
Third quarter $15.03  $13.63 
Fourth quarter $17.61  $13.70 

As of December 31, 2017,2023, CPER had approximately 2,51419,000 holders of shares.

USAG

  High  Low 
Fiscal year 2017        
First quarter $19.48  $17.96 
Second quarter $18.00  $17.56 
Third quarter $17.61  $16.17 
Fourth quarter $17.32  $15.87 

  High  Low 
Fiscal year 2016        
First quarter $19.64  $18.29 
Second quarter $20.15  $18.23 
Third quarter $20.80  $18.90 
Fourth quarter $19.13  $18.07 

As of December 31, 2017, USAG had approximately 169 holders of shares.

48 

Dividends

None of the Trust Series has made, and does not currently intend to make, cash distributions to its shareholders.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

USCI

USCI does not purchase shares directly from its shareholders. In connection with its redemption of baskets held by Authorized Participants, USCI redeemed 106 baskets (comprising 500,000300,000 shares) and 10740 baskets (comprising 5,350,0002,000,000 shares) for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2017,2023, respectively. Monthly redemptions for the last three months are detailed below.

Total Number of Shares

Average Price Per

Period

    

Redeemed

    

Share

10/1/23 to 10/31/23

 

50,000

$

56.98

11/1/23 to 11/30/23

 

50,000

$

57.78

12/1/23 to 12/31/23

 

200,000

$

57.43

Total

 

300,000

 

Period Total Number
of Shares
Redeemed
  Average Price
Per Share
 
10/1/17 to 10/31/17  -   NA 
11/1/17 to 11/30/17  150,000  $41.10 
12/1/17 to 12/31/17  350,000  $41.12 
Total  500,000     

CPER

CPER does not purchase shares directly from its shareholders. In connection with its redemption of baskets held by Authorized Participants, CPER did not redeemredeemed 18 basket (comprising 900,000 shares) and 94 baskets (comprising 4,700,000 shares) for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and redeemed 9 baskets (comprising 450,000 shares) for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017.

PeriodTotal Number
of Shares

Redeemed
Average Price
Per Share
10/1/17 to 10/31/17-NA
11/1/17 to 11/30/17-NA
12/1/17 to 12/31/17-NA
Total-

USAG

USAG does not purchase shares directly from its shareholders. In connection with its redemption of baskets held by Authorized Participants, USAG did not redeem any baskets2023, respectively. Monthly redemptions for the last three or twelve months ended December 31, 2017.are detailed below.

Total Number of Shares

Average Price Per

Period

Redeemed

Share

10/1/23 to 10/31/23

 

400,000

$

22.31

11/1/23 to 11/30/23

 

300,000

$

22.93

12/1/23 to 12/31/23

 

200,000

$

23.94

Total

 

900,000

 

  

PeriodTotal Number
of Shares

Redeemed
Average Price
Per Share
10/1/17 to 10/31/17-NA
11/1/17 to 11/30/17-NA
12/1/17 to 12/31/17-NA
Total-

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.[Reserved].

Financial Highlights for USCI (for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013)

(Dollar amounts in 000’s except for per share information)

  Year ended
December 31,
 2017
  Year ended
December 31,
 2016
  Year ended
December 31,
 2015
  Year ended
December 31,
 2014
  Year ended
December 31,
 2013
 
Total assets $504,277  $643,374  $521,732  $753,942  $513,723 
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on futures transactions, inclusive of commissions $27,280  $(12,203) $(98,593) $(135,557) $(17,220)
Net income (loss) $26,491  $(15,640) $(103,688) $(141,838) $(22,367)
Weighted-average shares  12,996,575   14,559,973   12,705,890   12,419,041   9,051,370 
Net income (loss) per share $2.46  $(0.50) $(7.72) $(7.82) $(2.39)
Net income (loss) per weighted average share $2.04  $(1.07) $(8.16) $(11.42) $(2.47)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $464,781  $601,266  $474,315  $711,985  $474,124 

49 

Financial Highlights for CPER (for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013)

(Dollar amounts in 000’s except for per share information)

  Year ended
December 31,
2017
  Year ended
December 31,
 2016
  Year ended
December 31,
 2015
  Year ended
December 31,
 2014
  Year ended
December 31,
 2013
 
Total assets $13,127  $5,805  $2,184  $2,912  $2,379 
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on futures transactions, inclusive of commissions $2,257  $248  $(623) $(383) $(233)
Net income (loss) $2,265  $237  $(636) $(405) $(251)
Weighted-average shares  577,397   200,546   118,082   150,411   100,000 
Net income (loss) per share $4.69  $2.12  $(4.86) $(3.82) $(2.51)
Net income (loss) per weighted average share $3.92  $1.18  $(5.39) $(2.69) $(2.51)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $9,300  $5,388  $1,871  $2,729  $2,041 

Financial Highlights for USAG (for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013)

(Dollar amounts in 000’s except for per share information)

  Year ended
December 31,
 2017
  Year ended
December 31,
 2016
  Year ended
December 31,
 2015
  Year ended
December 31,
 2014
  Year ended
December 31,
 2013
 
Total assets $1,798  $1,972  $2,023  $2,338  $2,366 
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on futures transactions, inclusive of commissions $(151) $(72) $(304) $36  $(255)
Net income (loss) $(150) $(79) $(317) $18  $(277)
Weighted-average shares  100,000   100,000   100,000   100,000   100,000 
Net income (loss) per share $(1.50) $(0.79) $(3.17) $0.18  $(2.77)
Net income (loss) per weighted average share $(1.50) $(0.79) $(3.17) $0.18  $(2.77)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $1,594  $1,782  $1,821  $2,142  $2,099 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto of the Trust included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Forward-Looking Information

This annual report on Form 10-K, including this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains forward-looking statements regarding the plans and objectives of management for future operations. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Trust’seach Trust Series’ actual results,

61

performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Each Trust Series believes these factors include, but are not limited to, the following: changes in inflation in the United States, movements in U.S. and foreign currencies, market volatility in the commodities markets and futures markets in part attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic in February 2020, the Russia-Ukraine war and conflicts in the Middle East. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe the Trust’seach Trust Series’ future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend” or “project,” the negative of these words, other variations on these words or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that may be incorrect, and theeach Trust Series cannot assure investors that the projections included in these forward-looking statements will come to pass. The Trust’sEach Trust Series’ actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors.


TheEach Trust Series has based the forward-looking statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K on information available to it on the date of this annual report on Form 10-K, and theeach Trust Series assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Although theeach Trust Series undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, investors are advised to consult any additional disclosures that theeach Trust Series may make directly to them or through reports that theeach Trust Series files in the future files with the SEC,Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

Introduction

Each Trust Series is a commodity pool that issues shares representing fractional undivided beneficial interests in such Trust Series that may be purchased and sold on the NYSE Arca. The Trust Series are series of the Trust, a Delaware Statutory Truststatutory trust formed on December 21, 2009.

United States Commodity Index Fund

USCI invests in futures contracts for commodities that are traded on the Futures Exchanges and, to a lesser extent, in order to comply with regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, Other Commodity-Related Investments. Market conditions that USCF currently anticipates could cause USCI to invest in Other Commodity Related Investments would beinclude, but are not limited to, those allowing USCI to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing.

The investment objective of USCI is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share NAVnet asset value (“NAV”) to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the SDCI,SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total ReturnSM (the “SDCI”), less USCI’s expenses.

The SDCI is designed to reflect the performance of a diversified group of commodities. The SDCI is owned and maintained by SummerHaven Index Management, LLC (“SHIM”) and is calculated and published by Bloomberg L.P. Futures contracts for the commodities comprising the SDCI are traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”), ICE Futures (“ICE Futures”), Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”), Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”), London Metal Exchange (“LME”), and Commodity Exchange, Inc. (“COMEX”) (the NYMEX, ICE Futures, CBOT, CME, LME and COMEX, collectively, the “Futures Exchanges”) and are collectively referred to herein as “Futures Contracts.” The Futures Contracts that at any given time make up the SDCI are referred to herein as “Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.” The relative weighting of the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts will change on a monthly basis, based on quantitative formulas relating to the prices of the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts developed by SHIM.

USCI seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts. Then, if constrained by regulatory requirements, risk mitigation measures, liquidity requirements or in view of market conditions, USCI will invest next in other Futures Contracts based on the same commodity as the futures contracts subject to such regulatory constraints or market conditions, and finally, to a lesser extent, in other exchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts if one or more other Futures Contracts is not available. When USCI has invested to the fullest extent possible in exchange-traded futures contracts, USCI may then invest in other contracts and instruments based on the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, other Futures Contracts or the commodities included in the SDCI, such as cash-settled options, forward contracts, cleared swap contracts and swap contracts other than cleared swap contracts. Other exchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and other contracts and instruments based on the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts are collectively referred to as

62

“Other Commodity-Related Investments,” and together with Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and other Futures Contracts, “Commodity Interests.”

USCI seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing so that the average daily percentage change in USCI’s NAV for any period of 30 successive valuation days will be within plus/minus ten percent (10%) of the average daily percentage change in the price of the SDCI over the same period. USCF does not intendbelieves that the market arbitrage opportunities will cause the daily changes in USCI’s share price on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis to operate USCIclosely track the daily changes in a fashion such that itsUSCI’s per share NAV on a percentage basis. USCF believes that the net effect of this expected relationship and the expected relationship described above between USCI’s per share NAV and the SDCI will be that the daily changes in the price of USCI’s shares on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis will closely track the daily changes in the SDCI on a percentage basis, less USCI’s expenses. While USCI is composed of Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and is therefore a measure of the prices of the corresponding commodities comprising the SDCI for future delivery, there is nonetheless expected to be a reasonable degree of correlation between the SDCI and the cash or spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.

Investors should be aware that USCI’s investment objective is not for its NAV or market price of shares to equal, in dollar terms, the spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts that comprise the SDCI or the prices of any particular group of Futures Contracts. The SDCI is owned and maintained by SHIM and calculated and published by the Bloomberg. The SDCI is comprised of 14 Futures Contracts that are selected on a monthly basis from a list of 27 possible Futures Contracts.futures contracts. USCI invests first in the current Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and other Futures Contracts intended to replicate the return on the current Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and, thereafter may hold Futures Contracts in a particular commodity other than one specified as the Benchmark Component Futures Contract, or may hold Other Commodity-Related Investments that may fail to closely track the SDCI’s total return movements. If USCI increases in size, and due to its obligations to comply with regulatory limits or due to other market pricing or liquidity factors, USCI may invest in Futures Contract months other than the designated month specified as the Benchmark Component Futures Contract, or in Other Commodity-Related Investments, which may have the effect of increasing transaction related expenses and may result in increased tracking error.

USCI seekswill not seek to achieve its stated investment objective by investing in Futures Contracts and Other Commodity-Related Investments such that daily changes in its per share NAV closely track the daily changes in the price of the SDCI. USCI’s positions in Commodity Interests are rebalanced on a monthly basis in order to track the changing nature of the SDCI. If Futures Contracts relating to a particular commodity remain in the SDCI from one month to the next, such Futures Contracts are rebalanced to the 7.14% target weight. Specifically, on the Selection Date, it will be determined if a current Benchmark Component Futures Contract will be replaced by a new Futures Contract in either the same or different underlying commodity as a Benchmark Component Futures Contract for the following month, in which case USCI’s investments would have to be changed accordingly. In order that USCI’s trading does not unduly cause extraordinary market movements, and to make it more difficult for third parties to profit by trading based on market movements that could be expected from changes in the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, USCI’s investments typically are not rebalanced entirely on a single day, but rather typically rebalanced over a period of four days. After fulfillingtime greater than one day. This is because natural market forces called contango and backwardation have impacted the margintotal return on an investment in USCI’s shares during the past year relative to a hypothetical direct investment in the various commodities and, collateral requirements with respect to its Commodity Interests, USCF investsin the remainderfuture, it is likely that the relationship between the market price of USCI’s proceeds fromshares and changes in the salespot prices of shares in Treasuries or cash equivalents, and/or merely hold such assets in cash (generally in interest-bearing accounts).the underlying commodities will continue to be so impacted by contango and backwardation. (It is important to note that the disclosure above ignores the potential costs associated with physically owning and storing the commodities, which could be substantial.) As of December 31, 2017,2023, USCI held 1,794813 Futures Contracts on the NYMEX, 3,297held 1,308 Futures Contracts on the ICE Futures, 1,573held 918 Futures Contracts on the CBOT, 1,225held 182 Futures Contracts on the CME, 6,796held 1,360 Futures Contracts on the LME and 701held 185 Futures Contracts on the COMEX.COMEX, totaling 4,766 futures contracts.

United States Copper Index Fund

CPER invests in Futures Contracts for commodities that are traded on the COMEX and, to a lesser extent, in order to comply with regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, Other Copper-Related Investments. Market conditions that USCF currently anticipates could cause CPER to invest in Other Copper-Related Investments would beinclude, but are not limited to, those allowing CPER to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing.

The investment objective of CPER is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share NAV to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the SCI,SummerHaven Copper Index Total ReturnSM (the “SCI”), less CPER’s expenses. USCF does not intendCPER seeks to operate CPERachieve its investment objective by investing so that the average daily percentage change in a fashion such that its per shareCPER’s NAV for any period of 30 successive valuation days will equal, in dollar terms, the spot pricesbe within plus/minus ten percent (10%) of the commodities underlyingaverage daily percentage change in the prices of the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts that compriseover the SCI or the prices of any particular group of Futures Contracts.same period. The SCI is designed to reflect the performance of the investment returns formfrom a portfolio of copper futures contracts.contracts on the COMEX. The SCI is owned and maintained by SHIM and calculated and published by the NYSE Arca. The SCI is comprised of either twoone or three Eligible Copper Futures Contracts that are selected on a monthly basis based on quantitative formulas relating to the prices of the Eligible Copper Futures Contracts developed by SHIM. The Eligible Copper Futures Contracts that at any given time make up the SCI are referred to herein as “Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts.”


CPER seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing to the fullest extent possibleprimarily in the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts. Then, if constrained by regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, CPER willmay also, to a lesser extent, invest next in other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts and finally to a lesser extent, inbeyond the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts or other exchange tradedexchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, if oneas well as other investments based on copper, such as cash-settled options on Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, forward contracts for copper, cleared swap contracts, non-cleared “over-the-counter” or more“OTC” transactions that are based on the price of copper and other Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts and indices based on the foregoing (collectively, “Other Copper-Related Investments”). The following factors, among others, may be considered when determining CPER’s investments in Eligible Copper Futures Contracts or in Other Copper-Related Investments: regulatory requirements, risk mitigation measures taken by CPER, CPER’s FCMs, counterparties or other market participants, liquidity and market conditions. Other factors that may impact CPER���s investments in other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts, is not available. When CPER has invested to the fullest extent possible inother exchange-traded futures contracts, CPER may then invest inor Other Copper-Related Investments. As of December 31, 2017,Investments include allowing CPER held 153 Futures Contracts on the COMEX.

United States Agriculture Index Fund

USAG invests in Futures Contracts for commodities that are traded on ICE Futures US, ICE Futures Canada, CBOT, KCBT and the CME, and to a lesser extent, in order to comply with regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, Other Agriculture-Related Investments. Market conditions that USCF currently anticipates could cause USAG to invest in Other Agriculture-Related Investments would be those allowing USAG to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing. In addition, CPER may need to hold significant portions of its portfolio in cash beyond what it has historically held for reasons including (but not limited to) the need to address the changes in market conditions, regulatory requirements or risk mitigation measures or the need to satisfy

63

potential margin requirements. For convenience and unless otherwise specified, Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts and Other Copper-Related Investments collectively are referred to as “Copper Interests.”

TheCPER seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing so that the average daily percentage change in CPER’s NAV for any period of USAG is for30 successive valuation days will be within plus/minus ten percent (10%) of the average daily percentage change in the prices of the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts over the same period. USCF believes that market arbitrage opportunities will cause daily changes in CPER’s share price on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis, to closely track the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’CPER’s per share NAV to reflecton a percentage basis. USCF believes that the net effect of this expected relationship and the expected relationship described above between CPER’s per share NAV and the SCI will be that the daily changes in the price of CPER’s shares on the NYSE Arca on a percentage termsbasis will closely track the daily changes in the SCI on a percentage basis, less CPER’s expenses. While CPER is composed of Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts and is therefore a measure of the SDAI, less USAG’s expenses. USCF doesprices of the corresponding commodities comprising the SCI for future delivery, there is nonetheless expected to be a reasonable degree of correlation between the SCI and the cash or spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts.

Investors should be aware that CPER’s investment objective is not intendfor its NAV or market price of shares to operate USAG in a fashion such that its per share NAV will equal, in dollar terms, the spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component AgricultureCopper Futures Contracts that comprise the SDAI or the prices of any particular group of Agriculture Futures Contracts. The SDAIfutures contracts. CPER will not seek to achieve its stated investment objective over a time period of greater than one day. This is designedbecause natural market forces called contango and backwardation have impacted the total return on an investment in CPER’s shares during the past year relative to reflecta hypothetical direct investment in various commodities and, in the performancefuture, it is likely that the relationship between the market price of a diversified groupCPER’s shares and changes in the spot prices of agricultural commodities. The SDAIthe underlying commodities will continue to be so impacted by contango and backwardation. (It is ownedimportant to note that the disclosure above ignores the potential costs associated with physically owning and maintained by SHIM and calculated and published bystoring the NYSE Arca, comprisedcommodities, which could be substantial.) CPER’s shares began trading on November 15, 2011. As of 14 Eligible AgricultureDecember 31, 2023, CPER held 1,342 Futures Contracts thaton the COMEX.

Other Defined Terms

The SCI, together with the SDCI, are selectedreferred to throughout this annual report on a monthly basis based on quantitative formulas developed by SHIM. The Eligible AgricultureForm 10-K collectively as the “Applicable Index” or “Indices.”

Benchmark Component Futures Contracts that at any given time make up the SDAIand Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts are referred to throughout this annual report on Form 10-Q collectively as “Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.”

Other Commodity-Related Investments and Other Copper-Related Investments are collectively referred to herein as “Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts.“Other Related Investments.

USAG seeks Commodity Interests and Copper Interests are collectively referred to achieve its investment objective by investing to the fullest extent possible in Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts. Then, if constrained by regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, USAG will invest next in other Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts basedherein as “Applicable Interests” throughout this annual report on the same agricultural commodity as the futures contracts subject to such regulatory constraints or market conditions, and finally, to a lesser extent, in other exchange traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts, if one or more Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts is not available. When USAG has invested to the fullest extent possible in exchange-traded futures contracts, USAG may then invest in Other Agriculture-Related Interests. As of December 31, 2017, USAG held 34 Futures Contracts on the ICE Futures, 24 Futures Contracts on the CBOT, 10 Futures Contracts on the CME and 2 Futures Contract on the KCBT.Form 10-K.

Regulatory Disclosure

Regulation of Commodity Interests

The regulation of commodity interest trading in the United States and other countries is an evolving area of the law. Below are certain key regulatory requirements that are, or may be, relevant to the Trust Series. The various statements made in this summary are subject to modification by legislative action and changes in the rules and regulations of the SEC, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), CFTC, the NFA, the SEC, the futures exchanges, clearing organizations and other regulatory bodies. Pending final resolution of all applicable regulatory requirements, some examples of how new rules and regulations could impact the Trust Series are discussed in“Item “Item 1. Business” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Exchange Accountability Levels, Position Limits and Price Fluctuation Limits. Designated contract markets (“DCMs”), such as the NYMEX and ICE Futures, have established accountability levels and position limits on the maximum net long or net short futures contracts in commodity interests that any person or group of persons under common trading control (other than as a hedge, which is not applicable to the Trust Series’ investments) may hold, own or control. These levels and position limits apply to the futures contracts that each Trust Series invests in to meet the investment objective of such Trust Series. In addition to accountability levels and position limits, the NYMEX and ICE Futures may also set daily price limits on futures contracts. The daily price fluctuation limit establishes the maximum amount that the price of a futures contract may vary either up or down from the previous day’s settlement price. Once the daily price fluctuation limit has been reached in a particular futures contract, no trades may be made at a price beyond that limit.

64

The accountability levels for the commodities comprising an Applicable Index and other futures contracts traded on U.S. based futures exchanges are not a fixed ceiling, but rather a threshold above which such exchanges may exercise greater scrutiny and control over an investor’s positions.

As of December 31, 2023, USCI held 813 Futures Contracts on the NYMEX, held 1,308 Futures Contracts on the ICE Futures, held 918 Futures Contracts on the CBOT, held 182 Futures Contracts on the CME, held 1,360 Futures Contracts on the LME and held 185 Futures Contracts on the COMEX, totaling 4,766 futures contracts. As of December 31, 2023, CPER held 1,342 Futures Contracts on the COMEX. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, no Trust Series exceeded accountability levels imposed by the NYMEX, COMEX, CME, CBOT, LME or ICE Futures.

Position limits differ from accountability levels in that they represent fixed limits on the maximum number of futures contracts that any person may hold and cannot allow such limits to be exceeded without express CFTC authority to do so. In addition to accountability levels and position limits that may apply at any time, the Futures Exchanges may impose position limits on contracts held in the last few days of trading in the near month contract to expire. It is unlikely that a Trust Series will run up against such position limits. A Trust Series does not typically hold the near month contract in its Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts. In addition, each Trust Series’ investment strategy is to close out its positions during each Rebalancing Period in advance of the period right before expiration and purchase new contracts. As such, none of the Trust Series anticipates that position limits that apply to the last few days prior to a contract’s expiration will impact it. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, no Trust Series exceeded position limits imposed by the NYMEX, COMEX, CME, CBOT, LME or ICE Futures.

Federal Position Limits

Part 150 of the CFTC’s regulations (the “Position Limits Rule”) establishes federal position limits for 25 core referenced futures contracts (comprised of agricultural, energy and metals futures contracts), futures and options linked to the core referenced futures contracts, and swaps that are economically equivalent to the core referenced futures contracts that all market participants must comply with, with certain exemptions.

Certain Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts are subject to position limits under the Position Limits Rule, and the trading by each Trust Series does not qualify for an exemption therefrom. Accordingly, the Position Limits Rule could inhibit the Trust Series’ ability to invest in the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and thereby could negatively impact the ability of the Trust Series to meet its investment objective.

Margin for OTC Swaps

Rules put in place by U.S. federal banking regulators, the CFTC and the SEC require the daily exchange of variation margin and initial margin for swaps between swap dealers, major swap participants, security-based swap dealers, and major security-based swap participants (“Swap Entities”) and swaps between Swap Entities and their counterparties that are “financial end-users” (such rules, the “Margin Rules”). The Margin Rules require Swap Entities to exchange variation margin with all of their counterparties who are financial end-users. The minimum variation margin amount is the daily mark-to-market change in the value of the swap, taking into account the amount of variation margin previously posted or collected. Swap Entities are required to exchange initial margin with their financial end-users who have “material swaps exposure” (i.e., an average daily aggregate notional of $8 billion or more in non-cleared swaps calculated in accordance with the Margin Rules). The Margin Rules specify the types of collateral that may be posted or collected as initial margin or variation margin (generally cash, certain government, government-sponsored enterprise securities, certain liquid debt, certain equity securities, certain eligible publicly traded debt, and gold) and sets forth haircuts for certain collateral asset classes.

No Trust Series is a Swap Entity under the Margin Rules, but each is a financial end-user. Accordingly, each Trust Series will be subject to the variation margin requirements of the Margin Rules for any swaps that it enters into. However, no Trust Series has material swaps exposure and, accordingly, no Trust Series will be subject to the initial margin requirements of the Margin Rules.

Mandatory Trading and Clearing of Swaps

CFTC regulations require that certain swap transactions be executed on organized exchanges or “swap execution facilities” and cleared through regulated clearing organizations (“derivative clearing organizations” (“DCOs”)), if the CFTC mandates the central clearing of a particular class of swap and such swap is “made available to trade” on a swap execution facility. Currently, swap dealers, major swap participants, commodity pools, certain private funds and entities predominantly engaged in activities that are financial in nature are required to execute on a swap execution facility, and clear, certain interest rate swaps and index-based credit default swaps. As a result,

65

if a Trust Series enters into an interest rate or index-based credit default swap that is subject to these requirements, such swap will be required to be executed on a swap execution facility and centrally cleared. Mandatory clearing and “made available to trade” determinations with respect to additional types of swaps may be issued in the future, and, when finalized, could require each Trust Series to electronically execute and centrally clear certain OTC instruments presently entered into and settled on a bi-lateral basis. If a swap is required to be cleared, initial and variation margin requirements are set by the relevant clearing organization, subject to certain regulatory requirements and guidelines. Additional margin may be required and held by a Trust Series’ FCM.

Other Requirements for Swaps

Swaps that are not required to be cleared and executed on a SEF but that are executed bilaterally are also subject to various requirements pursuant to CFTC regulations, including, among other things, reporting and recordkeeping requirements and, depending on the status of the counterparties, trading documentation requirements and dispute resolution requirements.

Derivatives Regulations in Non-U.S. Jurisdictions

In addition to U.S. laws and regulations, a Trust Series may be subject to non-U.S. derivatives laws and regulations if it engages in futures and/or swap transactions with non-U.S. persons. For example, each Trust Series may be impacted by European laws and regulations to the extent that it engages in futures transactions on European exchanges or derivatives transactions with European entities. Other jurisdictions impose requirements applicable to futures and derivatives that are similar to those imposed by the U.S., including position limits, margin, clearing and trade execution requirements.

The CFTC is generally prohibited by statute from regulating trading on non-U.S. futures exchanges and markets. The CFTC, however, has adopted regulations relating to the marketing of non-U.S. futures contracts in the United States. These regulations permit certain contracts on non-U.S. exchanges to be offered and sold in the United States.

Infectious disease outbreaks like COVID-19 could negatively affect the valuation and performance of a Trust Series’ investments.

An outbreak of infectious respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 was first detected in China in December 2019 and spread globally.

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. COVID-19 resulted in numerous deaths, travel restrictions, closed international borders, enhanced health screenings at ports of entry and elsewhere, disruption of and delays in healthcare service preparation and delivery, prolonged quarantines and the imposition of both local and more widespread “work from home” measures, cancellations, loss of employment, supply chain disruptions, and lower consumer and institutional demand for goods and services, as well as general concern and uncertainty. The spread of COVID-19 had a material adverse impact on local economies in the affected jurisdictions and also on the global economy, as cross border commercial activity and market sentiment were impacted by the outbreak and government and other measures seeking to contain its spread.

Infectious disease outbreaks like COVID-19 may arise in the future and could adversely affect individual issuers and capital markets in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen. In addition, actions taken by government and quasi-governmental authorities and regulators throughout the world in response to such an outbreak, including the potential for significant fiscal and monetary policy changes, may affect the value, volatility, pricing and liquidity of some investments or other assets, including those held by or invested in by each Trust Series. Public health crises caused by infectious disease outbreaks may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social and economic risks in certain countries or globally and their duration cannot be determined with certainty.

In a rising rate environment, the Trust Series may not be able to fully invest at prevailing rates until any current investments in Treasury Bills mature in order to avoid selling those investments at a loss.

When interest rates rise, the value of fixed income securities typically falls. In a rising interest rate environment, a Trust Series may not be able to fully invest at prevailing rates until any current investments in Treasury Bills mature in order to avoid selling those investments at a loss. Interest rate risk is generally lower for shorter term investments and higher for longer term investments. The risk to the Trust Series of rising interest rates may be greater in the future due to the end of a long period of historically low rates, the effect of potential monetary policy initiatives, including actions taken by the U.S. Federal Reserve and other foreign equivalents to curb inflation, and resulting market reactions to those initiatives. When interest rates fall, a Trust Series may be required to reinvest the proceeds from the sale, redemption or early prepayment of a Treasury Bill or money market security at a lower interest rate.

66

A Trust Series may potentially lose money by investing in government money market funds.

The Trust Series invest in government money market funds. Although such government money market funds seek to preserve the value of an investment at $1.00 per share, there is no guarantee that they will be able to do so and a Trust Series may lose money by investing in a government money market fund. An investment in a government money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), or any other government agency. The share price of a government money market fund can fall below the $1.00 share price. A Trust Series cannot rely on or expect a government money market fund’s adviser or its affiliates to enter into support agreements or take other actions to maintain the government money market fund’s $1.00 share price. The credit quality of a government money market fund’s holdings can change rapidly in certain markets, and the default of a single holding could have an adverse impact on the government money market fund’s share price. Due to fluctuations in interest rates, the market value of securities held by a government money market fund may vary. A government money market fund’s share price can also be negatively affected during periods of high redemption pressures and/or illiquid markets.

Commodity Markets

Commodity Futures Price Movements

Year Ended December 31, 2017

2023

As measured by the four major diversified commodity indexes listed below, commodity futures prices exhibited a mostlystrong upward trend during the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. The table below compares the total returns of the SDCI to the fourthree major diversified commodity indexes over this time period.

SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total ReturnSM (“SDCI”)(1)

1.60

8.07

%

S&P GSCI Commodity Index (GSCI®) Total Return(2)

(4.27)

5.77

%

Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return(2)

(7.91)

1.70

%

Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Total ReturnTM(2)

(7.12)

6.16

%

(1)(1)The inception date for the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total ReturnSM is December 2009.
(2)(2)Source: Bloomberg

The value of the SDCI as of January 1, 2017December 31, 2022 was $1,262.46.$1,933.23. As of December 31, 2017,2023, the value of the SDCI was $1,364.38,$ 1,964.25, up approximately 8.07%1.60% over the year.year ended December 31, 2023.

Of the 27 components of SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index (SDCI), sixteen had positive returns for first-half 2022. Gas Oil returned 57.7% in the first-half 2022 while Copper declined by -17.4%. The best performing sector was energy (up 57.7%). Commodities have continued the 2021 rally as inflation grew from 1.4% in 2020 to 9.1% in 2022. Inflation is a headwind for stocks and bonds and a tailwind for real assets such as commodities. Historically, commodities have been a hedge against inflation and positive inflation shocks. In 2022, as the fact of high inflation became more evident, stocks and Bonds suffered losses while commodities continued to perform well. The age-old wisdom of stock-bond diversification has been challenged in an unprecedented way. Since the inception in 1976 of US aggregate bond index, 2022 is the only year where both US stocks and bonds have experience significant negative returns (-20.0% and -10.3% respectively). In contrast, USCI’s NAV was up 18.47% for the nine months ended September 30, 2023.

The return of approximately 8.07%1.60% on the SDCI listed above is a hypothetical return only and could not actually be achieved by an investor holding Futures Contracts due to the impact of trading costs and other expenses. USCI’s per share NAV began the year at $40.02$56.23 and ended the year at $42.48$56.34 on December 31, 2017,2023, an increase of approximately 6.15%0.20% over the year. USCI’s per share NAV reached its high for the year on December 31, 2017 at $42.48 and reached its low for the year on June 20, 2017 at $37.13. See Tracking Each Trust Series’ BenchmarkBenchmark” below for information about how expenses and income affect USCI’s per share NAV.

The Russia-Ukraine war and the emerging conflict in the Middle East due to Hamas’ attack on Israel have raised concerns among investors that a global shortage of many commodities is possible. Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus are major producers and exporters of many metals, grains, and energy products that are critical to global supply. Substantial productive capacity has been halted in Ukraine, and Russia may be unable or unwilling to export what it produces. This has put upward pressure on commodity prices globally, beyond the impact of bullish fundamentals that were already in place. Should the war continue or escalate, or if sanctions or retaliation lead to a further reduction in production and exports from Ukraine, Russia, and Belarus, then commodity prices could rise further and prices could become more volatile. Conversely, should concerns about commodity shortages resulting from the Russia-Ukraine war ebb due to an expected or actual resolution of the war, then commodity prices could stabilize or decline. Likewise, the situation in the Middle East has impacted energy prices, with WTI and Brent crude oil rising approximately 10% in the first two weeks after the Hamas attack. Crude, along with gasoline, heating oil, and gasoil would experience even stronger gains if production or transportation of crude oil is disrupted. If the situation remains contained primarily to Israel, and or, should hostilities end, then prices for crude oil and its derivatives could stabilize or decline.


67

Copper Markets

Copper Futures Price Movements

Year Ended December 31, 2017

2023

As measured by the two major copper indexes, copper futures prices exhibited a mostlyan upward trend during the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. The table below compares the total returns of the SCI to the Bloomberg Copper Subindex Total Return over this time period.

SummerHaven Copper Index Total ReturnTMSM(“SCI”)(1)

5.88

31.02

%

Bloomberg Copper Subindex Total Return(2)

4.73

29.17

%

(1)(1)The inception date for the SummerHaven Copper Index Total ReturnTM is November 2010.
(2)(2)Source: Bloomberg

The value of the SCI as of January 1, 2017December 31, 2022 was $815.94.$1,222.97. As of December 31, 2017,2023, the value of the SCI was $1,069.01,$ 1,294.82, up approximately 31.02%5.88% over the year.

year ended December 31, 2023.

The return of approximately 31.02%5.88% on the SCI listed above is a hypothetical return only and could not actually be achieved by an investor holding Futures Contracts due to the impact of trading costs and other expenses. CPER’s per share NAV began the year at $16.36$23.07 and ended the year at $21.05$24.10 on December 31, 2017,2023, an increase of approximately 28.67%4.46% over the year. CPER’s per share NAV reached its high for the year on December 28, 2017 at $21.09 and reached its low for the year on May 10, 2017 at $16.18. See Tracking Each Trust Series’ Benchmark” for information about how expenses and income affect CPER’s NAV.

Agriculture Markets

Agriculture Futures Price Movements

Year Ended December 31, 2017

As measured by the three major agriculture indexes listed below, agriculture futures prices exhibited moderate daily swings along with a mostly downward trend during the year ended December 31, 2017. The table below compares the total returns of the SDAI to the two major agriculture indexes over this time period.

SummerHaven Dynamic Agriculture Index Total ReturnSM(“SDAI”)(1)(7.19)%
Bloomberg Agriculture Subindex Total ReturnSM(2)(11.05)%
Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Agriculture ReturnTM(2)(5.18)%

(1)The inception date for the SummerHaven Dynamic Agriculture Index Total ReturnSM is September 2010.
(2)Source: Bloomberg

The value of the SDAI as of January 1, 2017 was $273.11. As of December 31, 2017, the value of the SDAI was $253.46, down approximately (7.19)% over the year.

The return of approximately (7.19)% on the SDAI listed above is a hypothetical return only and could not actually be achieved by an investor holding Futures Contracts due to the impact of trading costs and other expenses. USAG’s per share NAV began the year at $19.01 and ended the year at $17.51 on December 31, 2017, a decrease of approximately (7.89)% over the period. USAG’s per share NAV reached its high for the period on January 23, 2017 at $20.07 and reached its low for the period on December 12, 2017 at $16.97. See“Tracking Each Trust Series’ Benchmark” below for information about how expenses and income affect USAG’sCPER’s per share NAV.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the price of the front month copper futures contract traded in a range between $3.2105 per pound and $4.9290 per pound. Prices decreased by 16.78% between December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2023 finishing the period at $3.8105. Copper futures markets rose dramatically from 2020 to mid-April 2022. Copper prices declined sharply from late spring to mid-summer due to concerns about demand from the manufacturing sector, monetary tightening and related concerns about a slowdown in global growth, and COVID-19 flare ups in China.  In the second half of 2022, Copper recovered some of it’s earlier losses for the year, partially as a result of China reopening its economy. Long-term, copper demand is likely to remain robust and supply is also likely to remain constrained and slow to respond to demand increases.

The Russia-Ukraine war has affected many commodities in which Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus are major producers and exports, such as certain metals, grains, and energy products. However, copper is not one of the metals that depends heavily on supply from the region. As a result, copper prices rose only modestly from the outbreak of the war in comparison to other metals, such as Nickel. Copper supply is more affected by events, such as protests and labor strikes, that impact mining in south American nations, including Chile and Peru. Meanwhile, copper demand typical depends on the state of the global economy, particularly China, which drives industrial, commercial, and manufacturing use.

Valuation of Futures Contracts and the Computation of the Per Share NAV

Each Trust Series’ NAV is calculated once each NYSE Arca trading day. The per share NAV for a particular trading day is released after 4:00 p.m. New York time. Trading during the core trading session on the NYSE Arca typically closes at 4:00 p.m. New York time. The Trust Series’ Administrator uses the closing prices on the relevant Futures Exchanges of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts (determined at the earlier of the close of such exchange or 2:30 p.m. New York time) for the contracts held on the Futures Exchanges, but calculates or determines the value of all other investments of such Trust Series using market quotations, if available, or other information customarily used to determine the fair value of such investments.

Results of Operations

On July 30, 2010, USCI received a notice of effectiveness from the SEC for its registration of 50,000,000 shares on Form S-1 with the SEC. On August 10, 2010, USCI listed its shares on the NYSE Arca under the ticker symbol “USCI.” USCI established its initial offering per share NAV by setting the price at $50 and issued 100,000 shares to the initial Authorized Participant, Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp., in exchange for $5,000,000 in cash on August 10, 2010. USCI commenced investment operations on August 10, 2010 by purchasing Futures Contracts traded on the Futures Exchanges. In order to satisfy NYSE Arca listing standards that at least 100,000 shares be outstanding at the beginning of the trading day on the NYSE Arca, USCF purchased the initial Creation Basket from the initial Authorized Participant at the initial offering price. The $1,000 fee that would otherwise be charged to the Authorized Participant in connection with an order to create or redeem was waived in connection with the initial Creation Basket. USCF agreed not to resell the shares comprising such basket except that it may require the initial Authorized Participant to repurchase all of these shares at a per share price equal to USCI’s per share NAV within five days following written notice from USCF, subject to the conditions that:

68

(i) on the date of repurchase, the initial Authorized Participant must immediately redeem these shares in accordance with the terms of the Authorized Participant Agreement and (ii) immediately following such redemption at least 100,000 shares of USCI remain outstanding. USCF held such initial Creation Basket until September 3, 2010, at which time the initial Authorized Participant repurchased the shares comprising such basket in accordance with the specified conditions noted above. On September 14, 2011, USCF redeemed the 20 Sponsor Shares of USCI, and on September 19, 2011, USCF purchased five shares of USCI in the open market.


Since its initial offering of 50,000,000 shares, USCI has not registered any subsequent offerings10,000,000 additional shares as of its shares.December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2017,2023, USCI had issued 30,800,00041,600,000 shares, 11,800,0003,000,000 of which were outstanding. As of December 31, 2017, there were 19,200,0002023, USCI had registered an unlimited number of shares registered but not yet issued.available for issuance. More shares may have been issued by USCI than are outstanding due to the redemption of shares.

In connection with the Second Amended and Restated Trust Agreement dated November 10, 2010, USAG and CPER were designated as two additional series of the Trust. Following the designation of the additional series, an initial capital contribution of $3,000 was transferred from USCF to the Trust. On November 10, 2010, the Trust transferred $1,000 to each of USAG and CPER, which was deemed a capital contribution to each series. On November 14, 2011, USCF received 40 Sponsor Shares of CPER in exchange for the previously received capital contribution, representing a beneficial interest in CPER. On December 7, 2011, USCF redeemed the 40 Sponsor Shares of CPER and purchased 40 shares of CPER in the open market. On April 13, 2012, USCF received 40 Sponsor Shares of USAG in exchange for the previously received capital contribution, representing a beneficial interest in USAG. On June 28, 2012, USCF redeemed the 40 Sponsor shares of USAG and on October 3, 2012, purchased 5 shares of USAG on the open market.

The order to permit listing CPER and USAG on the NYSE Arca was received on October 20, 2011. On November 15, 2011, CPER listed its shares on the NYSE Arca under the ticker symbol “CPER.” CPER established its initial offering per share NAV by setting the price at $25.00 and issued 100,000 shares to the initial Authorized Participant, Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp., in exchange for $2,500,000 in cash on November 15, 2011. The $1,000 fee that would otherwise be charged to the Authorized Participant in connection with an order to create or redeem was waived in connection with the initial Creation Basket.

Since its initial offering of 30,000,000 shares, CPER has not registered any subsequent offerings50,000,000 additional shares as of its shares.December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2017,2023, CPER had issued 1,250,00026,700,000 shares, 600,0005,450,000 of which were outstanding. As of December 31, 2017, there were 28,750,0002023, CPER had registered an unlimited number of shares registered but not yet issued.available for issuance. More shares may have been issued by CPER than are outstanding due to the redemption of shares.

On April 13, 2012, USAG listed its shares onUSCF and the NYSE Arca underTrustee entered into the ticker symbol “USAG.” USAG established its initial per share NAV by setting the price at $25.00. On April 14, 2012, USCF purchased 2 initial Creation BasketsFourth Amended and Restated Declaration of USAG. In accordance with applicable requirements of Regulation M under the Exchange Act, no Creation Baskets were offered to Authorized Participants nor were the shares listed on the NYSE Arca until five business days had elapsed from the date of USCF’s purchase of the initial Creation Basket on April 4, 2012. The fee that would have otherwise been charged in connection with an order to create or redeem was waived in connection with the initial Creation Basket.

Since its initial offering of 20,000,000 shares, USAG has not registered any subsequent offerings of its shares. AsTrust and Trust Agreement effective as of December 31, 2017, USAG had issued 200,000 shares, 100,000 of which were outstanding. As of December 31, 2017, there were 19,800,000 shares registered but not yet issued. More shares may have been issued by USAG than are outstanding due to the redemption of shares.

Unlike funds that are registered under the 1940 Act, shares that have been redeemed by the Trust Series cannot be resold. As a result, each Trust Series contemplates that additional offerings of its shares will be registered with the SEC in the future in anticipation of additional issuances and redemptions.

15, 2017.

As of December 31, 2017,2023, USCI CPER and USAGCPER had the following Authorized Participants: BNP Paribas Prime Brokerage, Inc.,ABN AMRO Clearing USA LLC, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Citadel Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC, Goldman Sachs & Company, Jefferies & Company Inc.LLC., JP Morgan Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp., Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC,Company Inc., RBC Capital Markets LLC and Virtu Financial BDAmericas LLC.


For the Year Ended December 31, 20172023 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2016; and for the Year Ended December 31, 2016, Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2015

2022

USCI

 For the Year Ended
December 31, 2017
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2016
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2015
 
Per share net asset value, end of period $42.48  $40.02  $40.52 

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

    

December 31, 

December 31, 

2023

2022

Per share net asset value, end of year

$

56.34

$

56.23

Average daily total net assets $515,814,138  $601,364,520  $564,246,884 

$

195,955,986

$

304,583,861

Dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents $4,017,753  $1,984,573  $462,464 

$

9,655,167

$

4,484,233

Annualized yield based on average daily total net assets  0.78%  0.33%  0.08%

 

4.93

%

 

1.47

%

Management fee $4,126,513  $4,810,916  $4,513,975 

$

1,567,809

$

2,436,671

Total fees and other expenses excluding management fees $1,223,298  $1,404,582  $1,773,760 

$

611,390

$

846,627

Total commissions accrued to brokers $527,610  $776,649  $711,491 

$

160,196

$

208,672

Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets  0.10%  0.13%  0.13%

 

0.08

%

 

0.07

%

Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing $505,199  $752,519  $675,051 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing  95.75%  96.89%  94.88%
Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity $22,411  $24,130  $36,440 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity  4.25%  3.11%  5.12%

Portfolio Expenses. The Trust Series’USCI’s expenses consist of investment management fees, brokerage fees and commissions, certain offering costs, licensing fees, registration fees, the fees and expenses of the independent directors of USCF and expenses relating to tax accounting and reporting requirements. The management fee that each Trust SeriesUSCI pays to USCF is calculated as a percentage of the total net assets of each Trust Series.USCI. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.

The increase in the per share NAV for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 20162022, was due to the increase in values of the Futures Contracts held by USCI;USCI.

Average interest rates earned on short-term investments held by USCI, including cash, cash equivalents and forTreasuries, were higher during the year ended December 31, 2016,2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015,2022. As a result, the decrease in the per share was due to the decrease in valuesamount of the Futures Contracts held by USCI.

The increase in dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents forby USCI as a percentage of average daily total net assets was higher during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to USCI’s increase on interest earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents; and for the year ended December 31, 2016,2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015,2022. To the increase in dividend and interestdegree that the aggregate yield is higher, the net expense ratio, inclusive of income, earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents was primarily due to USCI’s increase on interest earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents.

will be lower.

The decrease in total gross fees and other expenses excluding management fees for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 20162022 was due primarily due to a decrease in USCI’stotal commissions accrued tax;to brokers and for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, the decrease in total gross fees and expenses excluding management fees was primarily due to a decrease in USCI’s accrued tax.professional fees.

69

The decrease in USCI’s total commissions accrued to brokers for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 20162022, was due primarily due to a decrease in contracts traded during rebalancing;lower number of Futures Contracts being held and for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, the increase in USCI’s total commissions accrued to brokers was primarily due to an increase in contracts traded during rebalancing.traded.


CPER

Year ended

    

Year ended

December 31, 

December 31, 

2023

2022

Per share net asset value, end of year

$

24.10

$

23.07

Average daily total net assets

$

141,711,675

$

192,081,124

Dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents

$

6,985,479

$

2,559,897

Annualized yield based on average daily total net assets

 

4.93

%

 

1.33

%

Management fee

$

921,146

$

1,248,527

Total fees and other expenses excluding management fees

$

547,132

$

610,920

Fees and expenses related the registration or offering of additional shares

$

$

24,092

Total commissions accrued to brokers

$

38,792

$

55,612

Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets

 

0.03

%

 

0.03

%

  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2017
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2016
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2015
 
Per share net asset value, end of period $21.05  $16.36  $14.24 
Average daily total net assets $10,341,070  $2,949,214  $1,963,135 
Dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents $80,677  $9,625  $1,408 
Annualized yield based on average daily total net assets  0.78%  0.33%  0.07%
Management fee $67,217  $19,170  $12,760 
Total fees and other expenses excluding management fees $55,735  $80,063  $62,540 
Total amount of the expense waiver $40,153  $75,640  $59,601 
Expenses before allowance for the expense waiver $122,952  $99,233  $75,300 
Expenses after allowance for the expense waiver $82,799  $23,593  $15,699 
Total commissions accrued to brokers $5,461  $1,628  $947 
Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets  0.05%  0.06%  0.05%
Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing $4,390  $1,455  $588 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing  80.39%  89.37%  62.13%
Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity $1,071  $173  $359 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity  19.61%  10.63%  37.87%

Portfolio Expenses. The Trust Series’CPER’s expenses consist of investment management fees, brokerage fees and commissions, certain offering costs, licensing fees, registration fees, the fees and expenses of the independent directors of USCF and expenses relating to tax accounting and reporting requirements. The management fee that each Trust SeriesCPER pays to USCF is calculated as a percentage of the total net assets of each Trust Series.CPER. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.

The increase in the per share NAV for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 20162022, was primarily due to the increasean increase/decrease in values of the Futures Contracts held by CPER; and for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, the increase in the per share NAV was primarily due to the increase in values of the Futures Contracts held by CPER.

The dividend andAverage interest incomerates earned on Treasuries,short-term investments held by CPER, including cash, and/or cash equivalents forand Treasuries, were higher during the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, compared to December 31, 2016, was higher primarily due to higher average interest rates. The dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to year ended December 31, 2015 was higher primarily due to higher average interest rates.2022. As a result, the amount of income earned by CPER as a percentage of average daily total net assets was higher during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to year ended 2016 and2023. To the degree that the aggregate yield is higher, during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to year ended December 31, 2015.

net expense ratio, inclusive of income, will be lower.

The decrease in total gross fees and other expenses excluding management fees for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 20162022 was due primarily due to a decrease in certain of CPER’s operating expenses;total commissions accrued to brokers and for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, the increase in total gross fees and expenses excluding management fees was primarily due to an increase in certain of CPER’s operating expenses.

professional fees.

The increasedecrease in CPER’s total commissions accrued to brokers for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 20162022, was due primarily to an increase ina lower number of contracts traded;Futures Contracts being held and for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to December 31, 2015, the increase in total commissions accrued to brokers was primarily due to the increase in number of contracts traded.

USAG

  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2017
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2016
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2015
 
Per share net asset value, end of period $17.51  $19.01  $19.80 
Average daily total net assets $1,848,181  $1,984,755  $2,092,129 
Dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents $13,898  $6,205  $1,466 
Annualized yield based on average daily total net assets  0.75%  0.31%  0.07%
Management fee $12,013  $12,901  $13,599 
Total fees and other expenses excluding management fees $48,340  $75,162  $59,456 
Total amount of the expense waiver $45,533  $72,173  $56,318 
Expenses before allowance for the expense waiver $60,353  $88,063  $73,055 
Expenses after allowance for the expense waiver $14,820  $15,890  $16,737 
Total commissions accrued to brokers $1,923  $2,150  $3,116 
Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets  0.10%  0.11%  0.15%
Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing $1,923  $2,150  $3,116 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing  

100.00

%  100.00%  100.00%
Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity $  $  $ 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity  %  %  %

Portfolio Expenses. TheTracking Each Trust Series’ expenses consist of investment management fees, brokerage fees and commissions, certain offering costs, licensing fees,Benchmark

USCF seeks to manage each Trust Series’ portfolio such that changes in its average daily per share NAV, on a percentage basis, closely track the fees and expensesdaily changes in the average price of the independent directors of USCF and expenses relating to tax accounting and reporting requirements. The management fee that each Trust Series pays to USCF is calculated asApplicable Index, also on a percentage basis. Specifically, USCF seeks to manage the portfolio such that over any rolling period of 30-valuation days, the average daily change in a Trust Series’ per share NAV is within a range of 90% to 110% (0.9 to 1.1) of the total net assetsaverage daily change in the price of each Trust Series. The fee is accruedthe Applicable Index. As an example, if the average daily and paid monthly.

The decrease inmovement of the price of the Applicable Index for a particular 30-valuation daytime period was 0.50% per day, USCF would attempt to manage the portfolio such that the average daily movement of the per share NAV for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 was due to the decrease in valuesduring that same time period fell between 0.45% and 0.55% (i.e., between 0.9 and 1.1 of the Futures Contracts held by USAG; and forApplicable Index’s results). Each Trust Series’ portfolio management goals do not include trying to make the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, the decrease in thenominal price of its per share NAV was dueequal to the decrease in valuesnominal price of the Applicable Index, the nominal price of any particular commodity Futures Contract or the spot price for any particular commodity. USCF believes that it is not practical to manage the portfolio to achieve such an investment goal when investing in listed Futures Contracts held by USAG.

The dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to year ended December 31, 2016 was higher primarily due to higher average interest rates. The dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to year ended December 31, 2015 was higher primarily due to higher average interest rates. As a result, the amount of income earned by USAG as a percentage of average daily total net assets was higher during the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to year ended 2015 and higher during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to year ended 2015.

The decrease in gross total fees and expenses excluding management fees for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, was primarily due to a decrease in certain of USAG’s operating expenses; and the increase in gross total fees and expenses excluding management fees for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, was primarily due to an increase in certain of USAG’s operating expenses.

The decrease in USAG’s total commissions accrued to brokers for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 was due to a decrease in number of contracts traded; and for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to December 31, 2015, the decrease in total commissions accrued to brokers were primarily due was due to the decrease in number of contracts traded.


For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to the Three Months Ended December 31, 2016; and for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to the Three Months Ended December 31, 2015

USCI

  For the Three
Months Ended
December 31, 2017
  For the Three
Months Ended
December 31, 2016
  For the Three
Months Ended
December 31, 2015
 
Per share net asset value, end of period $42.48  $40.02  $40.52 
Average daily total net assets $485,695,629  $658,091,080  $524,673,153 
Dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents $1,314,097  $615,612  $185,129 
Annualized yield based on average daily total net assets  1.07%  0.37%  0.14%
Management fee $979,375  $1,323,374  $1,057,971 
Total fees and other expenses excluding management fees $327,955  $317,702  $380,185 
Total commissions accrued to brokers $86,604  $168,953  $190,423 
Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets  0.07%  0.10%  0.14%
Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing $84,189  $167,743  $180,598 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing  97.21% $99.28%  94.84%
Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity $2,415  $1,210  $9,825 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity  2.79%  0.72%  5.16%

The increase in the per share NAV for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016 was due to the increase in values of the Futures Contracts held by USCI; and the decrease in the per share NAV for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2015 was primarily due to the decrease in values of the Futures Contracts held by USCI.

The decrease in USCI’s average daily total net assets for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016, assets was primarily due to a decrease in shares outstanding; and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2015, the increase in USCI’s average daily total net assets was primarily due to an increase in shares outstanding.

The increase in USCI’s dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016 was due to higher yield earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents; and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2015, the increase was due to higher yield earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents.

The increase in USCI’s total fees and expenses excluding management fees for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016 was due to an increase in USCI’s audit and legal expenses; and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2015, the decrease in USCI’s total fees and expenses excluding management fees was due to a decrease in USCI’s commissions resulting from USCI’s smaller size as represented by total net assets.

The decrease in USCI’s total commissions accrued to brokers for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016, was primarily due to fewer contracts traded; and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months December 31, 2015, the decrease in USCI’s total commissions accrued to brokers was primarily due to a decrease in USCI’s total net assets resulting in fewer contracts traded.


CPER

  For the Three 
Months Ended
December 31, 2017
  For the Three 
Months Ended
December 31, 2016
  For the Three
Months Ended
December 31, 2015
 
Per share net asset value, end of period $21.05  $16.36  $14.24 
Average daily total net assets $8,658,563  $3,932,994  $2,215,133 
Dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents $23,433  $3,816  $569 
Annualized yield based on average daily total net assets  1.07%  0.39%  0.10%
Management fee $14,186  $6,426  $3,629 
Total fees and other expenses excluding management fees $7,916  $21,038  $16,780 
Total amount of the expense waiver $4,574  $19,556  $15,952 
Expenses before allowance for the expense waiver $22,102  $27,464  $20,409 
Expenses after allowance for the expense waiver $17,528  $7,908  $4,457 
Total commissions accrued to brokers $1,317  $386  $213 
Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets  0.06%  0.04%  0.04%
Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing $1,176  $309  $213 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing  89.29%  80.05%  100.00%
Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity $141  $77  $ 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity  10.71%  19.95%  %

The increase in the per share NAV for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to the increase in values of the Futures Contracts held by CPER; and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2015, the increase in the per share NAV was primarily due to the increase in values of the Futures Contracts held by CPER.

The increase in CPER’s average daily total net assets for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016 were due to an increase in values of Futures Contracts held in CPER and net creates; and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2015, the increase in CPER’s average daily total net assets was primarily due to an increase in values of Futures Contracts held in CPER.

The increase in CPER’s dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016 were due to higher yield earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents and net creates; and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2015, the increase was due to higher yield earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents.

The decrease in CPER’s total gross fees and expenses excluding management fees for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016 was due to a decrease in CPER’s professional expenses; and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2015, the increase in USCI’s total fees and expenses excluding management fees was due to an increase in CPER’s professional expenses.

The increase in CPER’s total commissions accrued to brokers for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016, was primarily due to an increase in CPER’s total net assets due to creates resulting in more contracts traded; and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months December 31, 2015, the increase in CPER’s total commissions accrued to brokers was primarily due to an increase in CPER’s total net assets due to creates resulting in more contracts traded.


USAG

  For the Three 
Months Ended
December 31, 2017
  For the Three
Months Ended
December 31, 2016
  For the Three 
Months Ended
December 31, 2015
 
Per share net asset value, end of period $17.51  $19.01  $19.80 
Average daily total net assets $1,756,306  $1,940,085  $2,010,205 
Dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents $4,775  $1,714  $484 
Annualized yield based on average daily total net assets  1.08%  0.35%  0.10%
Management fee $2,877  $3,170  $3,294 
Total fees and other expenses excluding management fees $9,355  $19,852  $16,761 
Total amount of the expense waiver $8,708  $19,162  $16,121 
Expenses before allowance for the expense waiver $12,232  $23,022  $20,055 
Expenses after allowance for the expense waiver $3,524  $3,860  $3,934 
Total commissions accrued to brokers $410  $362  $1,510 
Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets  0.09%  0.07%  0.30%
Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing $410  $362  $1,150 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing  100.00%  100.00%  100.00%
Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity $  $  $ 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity  %  %  %

The decrease in the per share NAV for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016 was due to the decrease in values of the Futures Contracts held by USAG; and the decrease in the per share NAV for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2015, was due to the decrease in values of the Futures Contracts held by USAG.

USAG’s average daily total net assets for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016, were lower primarily due to a decrease in values of the Futures Contracts held by USAG; and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2015, USAG’s average daily total net assets was lower primarily due to a decrease in values of the Futures Contracts held by USAG.

The increase in CPER’s dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016 was due to higher yield earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents; and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2015, the increase was due to higher yield earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents.

The decrease in total gross fees and expenses excluding management fees for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016, was primarily due to a decrease in certain USAG’s operating expenses; and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2015, the increase in total gross fees and expenses excluding management fees was primarily due to an increase in certain USAG’s operating expenses.

USAG’s total commissions accrued to brokers for the three months ended December 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016 were higher and primarily due to the total number of contracts traded; and for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to the three month ended December 31, 2015, were lower and primarily due to the total number of contracts traded.

59 

Other-Related Investments.

Portfolio Holdings for USCI

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, USCI’s portfolio held at all times Futures Contracts based on at least fourteen different commodities. Due to changes in the composition of the SDCI, each month the list of Benchmark Component Futures Contracts held by

70

USCI changed (see the section The SDCI“The SDCI” below). The table below lists the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts held during the year ended December 31, 2017.each month in 2023.

Benchmark Component Futures Contracts for USCI

 

= Component

Source: Bloomberg


Commodity

1/1/2023

2/1/2023

3/1/2023

4/1/2023

5/1/2023

6/1/2023

7/1/2023

8/1/2023

9/1/2023

10/1/2023

11/1/2023

12/1/2023

Aluminum

l

Cocoa

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Coffee

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Copper

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Corn

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Cotton

l

l

l

l

Crude Oil (Brent)

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Crude Oil (WTI)

l

l

l

l

l

l

Feeder Cattle

l

Gas Oil

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Gold

Heating Oil

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Lead

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Lean Hogs

l

l

l

l

Live Cattle

l

l

l

l

l

l

Natural Gas

l

Nickel

Platinum

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Silver

l

l

Soybean Meal

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Soybean Oil

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Soybeans

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Sugar

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Tin

l

l

l

l

Unleaded Gasoline

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Wheat

Zinc

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

The table below reflects the same listing of monthly Benchmark Component Futures Contracts as the tables above with two changes. First, the table below includes a column showing the change in the spot price of each of the 27 commodities for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. Second, while the tables above list the order of the commodities alphabetically, (firstthe table below lists the commodities first by which of the sixfive sectors a commodity falls into and then within each sector), the table below lists the commoditiessector from the commodity that had the highest positive change in spot price to the commodity that had the lowest positive change or largest negative change in spot price. Investors are cautioned that the change in the spot price of a given commodity does not represent the actual return that USCI might have earned on any holdings in futures contracts based on that commodity. This is due to two factors. First, the return on a futures contract may be higher, or lower, than the change in the spot price of the commodity due to the impact of backwardation or contango. Second, USCI may not have owned any such futures contract for the entire time period represented in the table below. Thus, USCI’s total actual return on its holdings in any of the commodities shown below may be higher, or lower, than the actual change in the spot price of the particular commodity.

71

Benchmark Component Futures Contracts for USCI

YTD Spot

Commodity

1/1/2023

2/1/2023

3/1/2023

4/1/2023

5/1/2023

6/1/2023

7/1/2023

8/1/2023

9/1/2023

10/1/2023

11/1/2023

12/1/2023

 Price Performance

Soybean Meal

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

(14.9)

%

Corn

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

(19.3)

%

Wheat

(20.7)

%

Soybean Oil

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

(25.0)

%

Soybeans

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

(30.5)

%

Lead

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

2.1

%

Zinc

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

1.7

%

Nickel

0.1

%

Tin

l

l

l

l

(11.6)

%

Copper

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

(12.0)

%

Aluminum

l

(45.0)

%

Live Cattle

l

l

l

l

l

l

61.4

%

Cotton

l

l

l

l

21.0

%

Sugar

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

12.6

%

Coffee

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

12.2

%

Lean Hogs

l

l

l

l

2.7

%

Natural Gas

l

(2.8)

%

Feeder Cattle

l

(22.5)

%

Cocoa

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

(43.8)

%

Heating Oil

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

(10.3)

%

Crude Oil (WTI)

l

l

l

l

l

l

(10.7)

%

Unleaded Gasoline

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

(14.5)

%

Gas Oil

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

(18.5)

%

Crude Oil (Brent)

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

(24.1)

%

Silver

l

l

13.4

%

Platinum

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

0.2

%

Gold

(7.3)

%

• = Component

* From 12/31/22 to 12/31/2023 Source: Bloomberg

Tracking each Trust Series’ Benchmark

USCF seeks to manage each Trust Series’ portfolio such that changes in its average daily per share NAV, on a percentage basis, closely track the changes in the average price of the Applicable Index, also on a percentage basis. Specifically, USCF seeks to manage the portfolio such that over any rolling period of 30-valuation days, the average daily change in a Trust Series’ per share NAV is within a range of 90% to 110% (0.9 to 1.1) of the average daily change in the price of the Applicable Index. As an example, if the average daily movement of the price of the Applicable Index for a particular 30-valuation day time period was 0.50% per day, USCF would attempt to manage the portfolio such that the average daily movement of the per share NAV during that same time period fell between 0.45% and 0.55% (i.e., between 0.9 and 1.1 of the Applicable Index’s results). Each Trust Series’ portfolio management goals do not include trying to make the nominal price of its per share NAV equal to the nominal price of the Applicable Index, the nominal price of any particular commodity Futures Contract or the spot price for any particular commodity. USCF believes that it is not practical to manage the portfolio to achieve such an investment goal when investing in listed Futures Contracts and Other Related Investments.

USCI

For the 30 valuation30-valuation days ended December 31, 2017,2023, the simple average daily change in the SDCI was 0.1484%(0.137)%, while the simple average daily change in the per share NAV of USCI over the same time period was 0.1379%(0.140)%. The average daily difference was (0.0105)%0.003% (or (1.05)0.3 basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the SDCI, the average errordifference in daily tracking by the per share NAV was (3.04)(1.728)%, meaning that over this time period USCI’s tracking errordifference was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal.

Since the commencement of the offering of USCI’s shares to the public on August 10, 2010 through December 31, 2023, the simple average daily change in the SDCI was 0.013%, while the simple average daily change in the per share NAV of USCI over the same time period was 0.007%. The average daily difference was 0.006% (or 0.6 basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the SDCI, the average difference in daily tracking by the per share NAV was (6.416)%, meaning that over this time period USCI’s tracking difference was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal.

The following two charts demonstrate the correlation between the changes in SDCI’s NAV and the changes in the SDCI. The first chart below shows the daily movement of USCI’s per share NAV versus the daily movement of the SDCI for the 30-valuation day period ended December 31, 2017,29, 2023, the last trading day in December. The second chart below shows the monthly total returns of USCI as compared to the monthly value of the Benchmark Component Futures ContractsSDCI for the five years ended December 31, 2017.2023.


72

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Graphic

 

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Graphic

 

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS


An alternative tracking measurement of the return performance of USCI versus the return of theits SDCI can be calculated by comparing the actual return of USCI, measured by changes in its per share NAV, versus theexpected changes in its per share NAV under the assumption that USCI’s returns had been exactly the same as the daily changes in the price of theits SDCI.

For the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, the actual total return of USCI as measured by changes in its per share NAV was 6.15%0.20%. This is based on an initial per share NAV of $40.02 on$56.23 as of December 31, 20162022 and an ending per share NAV as of December 31, 20172023 of $42.48.

73

$56.34. During this time period, USCI made no distributions to its shareholders. However, if USCI’s daily changes in its per share NAV had instead exactly tracked the changes in the daily total return of the SDCI, USCI would have had an estimated per share NAV of $43.25$57.13 as of December 31, 2017,2023, for a total return over the relevant time period of 8.07%1.60%. The difference between the actual per share NAV total return of USCI of 6.15%0.20% and the expected total return based on the SDCI of 8.07%1.60% was an errora difference over the time period of (1.92)(1.40)%, which is to say that USCI’s actual total return underperformed the SDCI resultits benchmark by that percentage. USCI incurs expenses primarily composed of the management fee, brokerage commissions for the buying and selling of futures contracts, and other expenses. The impact of these expenses, offset by interest and dividend income, and net of positive or negative execution, tends to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of USCI to track slightly lower or higher than daily changes in the price of the SDCI. These expenses are offset in part by the income that USCI collects on its cash and cash equivalent holdings. During the year ended December 31, 2017, USCI earned interest income of $4,017,753, which is equivalent to a weighted average income rate of approximately 0.78% for such period. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, USCI also collected $15,750 from its Authorized Participants for creating or redeeming baskets of shares. This income also contributed to USCI’s actual total return. However, if the total assets of USCI continue to increase, USCF believes that the impact on actual total returns of these fees from creations and redemptions will diminish as a percentage of the actual total return. During the year ended December 31, 2017, USCI incurred total expenses of $5,349,811. Income from interest and Authorized Participant collections net of expenses was $(1,316,308), which is equivalent to a weighted average net income rate of approximately (0.26)% for the year ended December 31, 2017.

By comparison, for the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, the actual total return of USCI as measured by changes in its per share NAV was (1.23)%29.47%. This wasis based on an initial per share NAV of $40.52 on$43.43 as of December 31, 20152021 and an ending per share NAV as of December 31, 20162022 of $40.02.$56.23. During this time period, USCI made no distributions to its shareholders. However, if USCI’s daily changes in its per share NAV had instead exactly tracked the changes in the daily total return of the SDCI, USCI would have had an estimated per share NAV of $40.42$57.17 as of December 31, 2016,2022, for a total return over the relevant time period of (0.25)%31.64%. The difference between the actual per share NAV total return of USCI of (1.23)%29.47% and the expected total return based on the SDCI of (0.25)%31.64% was an errora difference over the time period of (0.98)(2.17)%, which is to say that USCI’s actual total return underperformed the SDCI resultits benchmark by that percentage. USCI incurred expenses primarily composed of the management fee, brokerage commissions for the buying and selling of futures contracts, and other expenses. The impact of these expenses, offset by interest and dividend income, and net of positive or negative execution, tended to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of USCI to track slightly lower than daily changes in the price of the SDCI. These expenses are offset in part by the income that USCI collects on its cash and cash equivalent holdings. During the year ended December 31, 2016, USCI earned interest income of $1,984,573, which is equivalent to a weighted average income rate of approximately 0.33% for such period. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2016, USCI also collected $17,500 from its Authorized Participants for creating or redeeming baskets of shares. This income also contributed to USCI’s actual total return. However, if the total assets of USCI continue to increase, USCF believes that the impact on actual total returns of these fees from creations and redemptions will diminish as a percentage of the actual total return. During the year ended December 31, 2016, USCI incurred total expenses of $6,215,498. Income from interest and Authorized Participant collections net of expenses was $(4,213,425), which is equivalent to a weighted average net income rate of approximately (0.70)% for the year ended December 31, 2016.

By comparison, for the year ended December 31, 2015, the actual total return of USCI as measured by changes in its per share NAV was (16.00)%. This was based on an initial per share NAV of $48.24 on December 31, 2014 and an ending per share NAV as of December 31, 2015 of $40.52. During this time period, USCI made no distributions to its shareholders. However, if USCI’s daily changes in its per share NAV had instead exactly tracked the changes in the daily return of the SDCI, USCI would have had an estimated per share NAV of $41.37 as of December 31, 2015, for a total return over the relevant time period of (14.24)%. The difference between the actual per share NAV total return of USCI of (16.00)% and the expected total return based on the SDCI of (14.24)% was an error over the time period of (1.76)%, which is to say that USCI’s actual total return underperformed the SDCI result by that percentage. USCI incurred expenses primarily composed of the management fee, brokerage commissions for the buying and selling of futures contracts, and other expenses. The impact of these expenses, offset by interest and dividend income, and net of positive or negative execution, tended to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of USCI to track slightly lower than daily changes in the price of the SDCI. These expenses are offset in part by the income that USCI collects on its cash and cash equivalent holdings. During the year ended December 31, 2015, USCI earned interest income of $462,464, which is equivalent to a weighted average income rate of approximately 0.08% for such period. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2015, USCI also collected $15,400 from its Authorized Participants for creating or redeeming baskets of shares. This income also contributed to USCI’s actual total return. However, if the total assets of USCI continue to increase, USCF believes that the impact on actual total returns of these fees from creations and redemptions will diminish as a percentage of the actual total return. During the year ended December 31, 2015, USCI incurred total expenses of $6,287,735. Income from interest and Authorized Participant collections net of expenses was $(5,810,221), which is equivalent to a weighted average net income rate of approximately (1.03)% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

CPER

For the 30 valuation days ended December 31, 2017, the simple average daily change in the SCI was 0.2478%, while the simple average daily change in the per share NAV of CPER over the same time period was 0.2402% The average daily difference was (0.0076)% (or (0.76) basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the SCI, the average error in daily tracking by the per share NAV was 0.0693%, meaning that over this time period CPER’s tracking error was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal.  The first chart below shows the daily movement of CPER’s per share NAV versus the daily movement of the SCI for the 30-valuation day period ended December 31, 2017, the last trading day in December. The second chart below shows the monthly total returns of CPER as compared to the monthly value of the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts for the five years ended December 31, 2017.


Since the commencement of the offering of CPER’s shares to the public on November 15, 2011 to December 31, 2017, the simple average daily change in the SCI was 0.0010%, while the simple average daily change in the per share NAV of CPER over the same time period was (0.0032)%. The average daily difference was (0.0042)% (or (0.42) basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the SCI, the average error in daily tracking by the per share NAV was (3.35)%, meaning that over this time period CPER’s tracking error was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal.

 

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

64 

 

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

An alternative tracking measurement of the return performance of CPER versus the return of the SCI can be calculated by comparing the actual return of CPER, measured by changes in its per share NAV, versus theexpected changes in its per share NAV under the assumption that CPER’s returns had been exactly the same as the daily changes in the price of the SCI.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the actual total return of CPER as measured by changes in its per share NAV was 28.67%. This is based on an initial per share NAV of $16.36 on December 31, 2016 and an ending per share NAV as of December 31, 2017 of $21.05. During this time period, CPER made no distributions to its shareholders. However, if CPER’s daily changes in its per share NAV had instead exactly tracked the changes in the daily return of the SCI, CPER would have had an estimated per share NAV of $21.43 as of December 31, 2017, for a total return over the relevant time period of 30.99%. The difference between the actual per share NAV total return of CPER of 28.67% and the expected total return based on the SCI of 30.99% was an error over the time period of (2.32)%, which is to say that CPER’s actual total return underperformed the SCI result by that percentage. CPER incurs expenses primarily composed of the management fee, brokerage commissions for the buying and selling of futures contracts, and other expenses. The impact of these expenses, offset by interest and dividend income, and net of positive or negative execution, tended to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of CPER to track slightly lower than daily changes in the price of the SCI. These expenses are offset in part by the income that CPER collects on its cash and cash equivalent holdings. During the year ended December 31, 2017, CPER earned interest income of $80,677, which is equivalent to a weighted average income rate of approximately 0.78% for such period. During the year ended December 31, 2017, CPER collected $4,550 in fees from its Authorized Participants for creating or redeeming baskets of shares. During the year ended December 31, 2017, CPER incurred net expenses of $82,799. Income from interest and Authorized Participant collections net of expenses was $2,428, which is equivalent to a weighted average net income rate of approximately 0.023% for the year ended December 31, 2017.

By comparison, for the year ended December 31, 2016, the actual total return of CPER as measured by changes in its per share NAV was 14.89%. This was based on an initial per share NAV of $14.24 on December 31, 2015 and an ending per share NAV as of December 31, 2016 of $16.36. During this time period, CPER made no distributions to its shareholders. However, if CPER’s daily changes in its per share NAV had instead exactly tracked the changes in the daily return of the SCI, CPER would have had an estimated per share NAV of $16.50 as of December 31, 2016, for a total return over the relevant time period of 15.87%. The difference between the actual per share NAV total return of CPER of 14.89% and the expected total return based on the SCI of 15.87% was an error over the time period of (0.98)%, which is to say that CPER’s actual total return underperformed the SCI result by that percentage. USCI incurred expenses primarily composed of the management fee, brokerage commissions for the buying and selling of futures contracts, and other expenses. The impact of these expenses, offset by interest and dividend income, and net of positive or negative execution, tended to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of CPER to track slightly lower than daily changes in the price of the SCI. These expenses are offset in part by the income that CPER collects on its cash and cash equivalent holdings. During the year ended December 31, 2016, CPER earned interest income of $9,625, which is equivalent to a weighted average income rate of approximately 0.33% for such period. During the year ended December 31, 2016, CPER collected $1,400 in fees from its Authorized Participants for creating or redeeming baskets of shares. During the year ended December 31, 2016, CPER incurred net expenses of $23,593. Income from interest and Authorized Participant collections net of expenses was $(12,568), which is equivalent to a weighted average net income rate of approximately (0.43)% for the year ended December 31, 2016.

65 

By comparison, for the year ended December 31, 2015, the actual total return of CPER as measured by changes in its per share NAV was (25.45)%. This was based on an initial per share NAV of $19.10 on December 31, 2014 and an ending per share NAV as of December 31, 2015 of $14.24. During this time period, CPER made no distributions to its shareholders. However, if CPER’s daily changes in its per share NAV had instead exactly tracked the changes in the daily return of the SCI, CPER would have had an estimated per share NAV of $14.35 as of December 31, 2015, for a total return over the relevant time period of (24.85)%. The difference between the actual per share NAV total return of CPER of (25.45)% and the expected total return based on the SCI of (24.85)% was an error over the time period of (0.60)%, which is to say that CPER’s actual total return underperformed the SCI result by that percentage. USCI incurred expenses primarily composed of the management fee, brokerage commissions for the buying and selling of futures contracts, and other expenses. The impact of these expenses, offset by interest and dividend income, and net of positive or negative execution, tended to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of CPER to track slightly lower than daily changes in the price of the SCI. These expenses are offset in part by the income that CPER collects on its cash and cash equivalent holdings. During the year ended December 31, 2015, CPER earned interest income of $1,408, which is equivalent to a weighted average income rate of approximately 0.07% for such period. During the year ended December 31, 2015, CPER collected $700 in fees from its Authorized Participants for creating or redeeming baskets of shares. During the year ended December 31, 2015, CPER incurred net expenses of $15,699. Income from interest and Authorized Participant collections net of expenses was $(13,591), which is equivalent to a weighted average net income rate of approximately (0.69)% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

USAG

For the 30-valuation days ended December 31, 2017, the simple average daily change in the SDAI was (0.0104)%, while the simple average daily change in the per share NAV of USAG over the same time period was (0.0233)%. The average daily difference was (0.0129)% (or (1.29)% basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the SDAI, the average error in daily tracking by the per share NAV was 17.92%, meaning that over this time period USAG’s tracking error was not within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal. The first chart below shows the daily movement of USAG’s per share NAV versus the daily movement of the SDAI for the 30-valuation day period ended December 31, 2017, the last trading day in December. The second chart below shows the monthly total returns of USAG as compared to the monthly value of the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts for the five years ended December 31, 2017.

Since the commencement of the offering of USAG’s shares to the public on April 13, 2012 to December 31, 2017, the simple average daily change in the SDAI was (0.0197)%, while the simple average daily change in the per share NAV of USAG over the same time period was (0.0222)%. The average daily difference was (0.0025)% (or (0.25) basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the SDAI, the average error in daily tracking by the per share NAV was 4.74%, meaning that over this time period USAG’s tracking error was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal.

 

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

66 

 

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

An alternative tracking measurement of the return performance of USAG versus the return of the SDAI can be calculated by comparing the actual return of USAG, measured by changes in its per share NAV, versus theexpected changes in its per share NAV under the assumption that USAG’s returns had been exactly the same as the daily changes in the price of the SDAI.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the actual total return of USAG as measured by changes in its per share NAV was (7.89)%. This is based on an initial per share NAV of $19.01 on December 31, 2016 and an ending per share NAV as of December 31, 2017 of $17.51. During this time period, USAG made no distributions to its shareholders. However, if USAG’s daily changes in its per share NAV had instead exactly tracked the changes in the daily total return of the SDAI, USAG would have had an estimated per share NAV of $17.64 as of December 31, 2017, for a total return over the relevant time period of (7.21)%. The difference between the actual per share NAV total return of USAG of (7.89)% and the expected total return based on the SDAI of (7.21)% was an error over the time period of (0.68)%, which is to say that USAG’s actual total return underperformed the SDAI result by that percentage. USAG incurs expenses primarily composed of the management fee, brokerage commissions for the buying and selling of futures contracts, and other expenses. The impact of these expenses, offset by interest and dividend income, and net of positive or negative execution, tends to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of USAGUSCI to track slightly lower or higher than daily changes in the price of the SDAI. These expenses are offsetSDCI.

CPER

For the 30-valuation days ended December 31, 2023, the simple average daily change in partthe SCI was 0.142%, while the simple average daily change in the per share NAV of CPER over the same time period was 0.138%. The average daily difference was 0.004% (or 0.4 basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the SCI, the average difference in daily tracking by the incomeper share NAV was (3.436)%, meaning that USAG collectsover this time period CPER’s tracking difference was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal.

Since the commencement of the offering of CPER’s shares to the public on November 15, 2011 through December 31, 2023, the simple average daily change in the SCI was 0.012%, while the simple average daily change in the per share NAV of CPER over the same time period was 0.008%. The average daily difference was 0.004% (or 0.4 basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the SCI, the average difference in daily tracking by the per share NAV was (2.917)%, meaning that over this time period CPER’s tracking difference was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its cashbenchmark tracking goal.

The following two charts demonstrate the correlation between the changes in CPER’s NAV and cash equivalent holdings. Duringthe changes in the SCI. The first chart below shows the daily movement of CPER’s per share NAV versus the daily movement of the SCI for the 30-valuation day period ended December 29, 2023, the last trading day in December. The second chart below shows the monthly total returns of CPER as compared to the monthly value of the SCI for the five years ended December 31, 2023.

74

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Graphic

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Graphic

An alternative tracking measurement of the return performance of CPER versus the return of its SCI can be calculated by comparing the actual return of CPER, measured by changes in its per share NAV, versus the expected changes in its per share NAV under the assumption that CPER’s returns had been exactly the same as the daily changes in its SCI.

75

For the year ended December 31, 2017, USAG earned interest income of $13,898, which is equivalent to a weighted average income rate of approximately 0.75% for such period. During the year ended December 31, 2017, USAG did not have any baskets for creates or redeems. However, if the total assets of USAG continue to increase, USCF believes that the impact on actual total returns of these fees from creations and redemptions will diminish as a percentage of the actual total return. During the year ended December 31, 2017, USAG incurred net expenses of $14,820. Income from interest and Authorized Participant collections net of expenses was $(922), which is equivalent to a weighted average net income rate of approximately (0.05)% for the year ended December 31, 2017.

By comparison, for the year ended December 31, 2016,2023, the actual total return of USAGCPER as measured by changes in its per share NAV was (3.99)%4.46%. This wasis based on an initial per share NAV of $19.80 on$23.07 as of December 31, 20152022 and an ending per share NAV as of December 31, 20162023 of $19.01.$24.10. During this time period, USAGCPER made no distributions to its shareholders. However, if USAG’sCPER’s daily changes in its per share NAV had instead exactly tracked the changes in the daily total return of the SDAI, USAGSCI, CPER would have had an estimated per share NAV of $18.97$24.40 as of December 31, 2016,2023, for a total return over the relevant time period of (4.19)%5.77%. The difference between the actual per share NAV total return of USAGCPER of (3.99)%4.46% and the expected total return based on the SDAISCI of (4.19)%5.77% was an errora difference over the time period of 0.20%(1.31)%, which is to say that USAG’sCPER’s actual total return underperformed the SDAI resultits benchmark by that percentage. USAG incurredCPER incurs expenses primarily composed of the management fee, brokerage commissions for the buying and selling of futures contracts, and other expenses. The impact of these expenses, offset by interest and dividend income, and net of positive or negative execution, tendedtends to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of USAGCPER to track slightly lower or higher than daily changes in the price of the SDAI. These expenses are offset in part by the income that USAG collects on its cash and cash equivalent holdings. During the year ended December 31, 2016, USAG earned interest income of $6,205, which is equivalent to a weighted average income rate of approximately 0.31% for such period. During the year ended December 31, 2016, USAG did not have any baskets for creates or redeems. However, if the total assets of USAG continue to increase, USCF believes that the impact on actual total returns of these fees from creations and redemptions will diminish as a percentage of the actual total return. During the year ended December 31, 2016, USAG incurred net expenses of $15,890. Income from interest and Authorized Participant collections net of expenses was $(9,685), which is equivalent to a weighted average net income rate of approximately (0.35%) for the year ended December 31, 2016.SCI.


By comparison, for the year ended December 31, 2015,2022, the actual total return of USAGCPER as measured by changes in its per share NAV was (13.80)(15.31)%. This wasis based on an initial per share NAV of $22.97 on$27.24 as of December 31, 20142021 and an ending per share NAV as of December 31, 20152022 of $19.80.$23.07. During this time period, USAGCPER made no distributions to its shareholders. However, if USAG’sCPER’s daily changes in its per share NAV had instead exactly tracked the changes in the daily total return of the SDAI, USAGSCI, CPER would have had an estimated per share NAV of $19.85$23.42 as of December 31, 2015,2022, for a total return over the relevant time period of (13.58)%-14.02%. The difference between the actual per share NAV total return of USAGCPER of (13.80)%-15.31% and the expected total return based on the SDAISCI of (13.58)(14.02)% was an errora difference over the time period of (0.22)(1.29)%, which is to say that USAG’sCPER’s actual total return underperformed the SDAI resultits benchmark by that percentage. USAG incurredCPER incurs expenses primarily composed of the management fee, brokerage commissions for the buying and selling of futures contracts, and other expenses. The impact of these expenses, offset by interest and dividend income, and net of positive or negative execution, tendedtends to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of USAGCPER to track slightly lower or higher than daily changes in the price of the SDAI. These expenses are offset in part by the income that USAG collects on its cash and cash equivalent holdings. During the year ended December 31, 2015, USAG earned interest income of $1,466, which is equivalent to a weighted average income rate of approximately 0.07% for such period. During the year ended December 31, 2015, USAG did not have any baskets for creates or redeems. However, if the total assets of USAG continue to increase, USCF believes that the impact on actual total returns of these fees from creations and redemptions will diminish as a percentage of the actual total return. During the year ended December 31, 2015, USAG incurred net expenses of $16,737. Income from interest and Authorized Participant collections net of expenses was $(15,271), which is equivalent to a weighted average net income rate of approximately (0.73)% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

SCI.

Factors That Can Impact Ability to Track Futures Contracts

the Applicable Index

There are currently five factors that have impacted or are most likely to impact a Trust Series’ ability to accurately track anits Applicable Index.

First, a Trust Series may buy or sell its holdings in the then current Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts at a price other than the closing settlement price of that contract on the day during which such Trust Series executes the trade. In that case, a Trust Series may pay a price that is higher, or lower, than that of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, which could cause the changes in the daily per share NAV of a Trust Series to either be too high or too low relative to the daily changes in the price of the Applicable Index. During the year ended December 31, 2017, USCF attemptedattempts to minimize the effect of these transactions by seeking to execute its purchase or sale of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts at, or as close as possible to, the end of the day settlement price. However, it may not always be possible for a Trust Series to obtain the closing settlement price and there is no assurance that failure to obtain the closing settlement price in the future will not adversely impact a Trust Series’ attempt to track the Applicable Index over time.

Index.

Second, each Trust Series incurs expenses primarily composed of the management fee, brokerage commissions for the buying and selling of futures contracts, and other expenses. The impact of these expenses tends to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of such Trust Series to track slightly lower than daily changes in the price of the Applicable Index. At the same time, each Trust Series earns dividend and interest income on its cash, cash equivalents and Treasuries. A Trust Series is not required to distribute any portion of its income to its shareholders and none of the Trust Series madedid not make any distributions to shareholders during the during the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. Interest payments, and any other income, were retained within the portfolio and added to each Trust Series’ NAV. AtWhen this income exceeds the same time, eachlevel of a Trust Series incurredSeries’ expenses for its management fee, brokerage commissions and other expenses (including ongoing registration fees). The calculationfees, licensing fees and the fees and expenses of each Applicable Index includes an interest portion, calculated daily using the 90-Day U.S. Treasury Bill’s total return, but does not include an expense component. When a Trust Series’ income exceeds the sumindependent directors of its expenses by the yield on the 90-Day U.S. Treasury Bill,USCF), such Trust Series realizes a net yield that tendswill tend to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of such Trust Series to track slightly higher than daily changes in the price of the Applicable Index. If this net yield is lower than the yield on the 90-Day U.S. Treasury Bill, that tends to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of such Trust Series to track slightly lower than daily changes in the price of the Applicable Index. If short-term interest rates rise above the currentthese levels, the level of deviation created by the yield would decrease.increase. Conversely, if short-term interest rates were to decline, the amount of error created by the yield would increase.decrease. When short-term yields drop to a level lower than the combined expenses of the management fee and the brokerage commissions, then the tracking error becomes a negative number and would tend to cause the daily returns of the per share NAV to underperform the daily returns of the Applicable Index. USCF anticipates that interest rates willmay continue to remain atincrease over the near future from historical lows and, therefore, itlows. It is anticipated that fees and expenses paid by each Trust Series willmay continue to be higher than interest earned by each Trust Series. As such, USCF anticipates that each Trust Series will continue to underperform tracking the Applicable Index until such a time whencould possibly outperform its benchmark so long as interest earned at least equals or exceedsis higher than the fees and expenses paid by each Trust Series.

Third, a Trust Series may hold Futures Contracts in a particular commodity other than the one specified as the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract, or may hold Other Related Investments in its portfolio that may fail to closely track the Applicable Index’s

76

total return movements. Taking USCI as an example, assume for a given month one of the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts is the NYMEX WTI physically settled Futures Contract, trading under the symbol “CL,” for the contract month of November 2017.2020. It is possible that USCI could hold a NYMEX WTI financially settled Futures Contract, trading under the symbol “WS,” for the contract month of November 2017.2020. Alternatively, and using the same example, USCI could hold the ICE WTI financially settled Futures Contract, also for the contract month of November 2017.2020. As a third example, USCI could hold the NYMEX WTI physically settled Futures Contract, trading under the symbol “CL,” but for a contract month other than November 2017.2020. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, no Trust Series held any Other Related Investments.

Fourth, a Trust Series could hold Other-Related Investments. In any of these cases,that case, the error in tracking the Applicable Index could result in daily changes in the per share NAV of a Trust Series that are either too high, or too low, relative to the daily changes in the price of the Applicable Index. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, none of the Trust Series held any Other-Related Investments, but did, at times, temporarily hold Futures Contracts that were in months other than the months specified as the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract. If any Trust Series increases in size, and due to its obligations to comply with regulatory limits, or due to other market pricing or liquidity factors, such Trust Series may invest in Futures Contract months other than the designated month specified as the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contract, or in Other-Related Investments, which may have the effect of increasing transaction related expenses and may result in increased tracking error.


Finally, a Trust Series could hold the same Futures contracts as its benchmark but at a different weight. This is due to the fact that the benchmark can theoretically own a fractional percentage of a Futures contract but a Trust Series must own a full contract. For a Trust Series with smaller asset base, this percentage difference can have a material impact.

Hypothetical Performance of Each Applicable Index

the SDCI

The table and chart below show the hypothetical performance of the SDCI from December 31, 2007January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2017.2023. The composition of the SDCI was revised effective December 24, 2020. Beginning with the commodity selection process that commenced on December 24, 2020, SHIM revised the composition of the SDCI to consolidate the six commodity sectors that comprised the index into five sectors. Specifically, prior to December 24, 2020, the SDCI reflected commodities in six commodity sectors: energy (e.g., crude oil, natural gas, heating oil, etc.), precious metals (e.g., gold, silver platinum), industrial metals (e.g., zinc, nickel, aluminum, copper, etc.), grains (e.g., wheat, corn, soybeans, etc.), softs (e.g., sugar, cotton, coffee, cocoa), and livestock (e.g., live cattle, lean hogs, feeder cattle).

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT USCI WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING.

FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

Since the SDCI was launched on December 18, 2009, there is only actual performance history of the SDCI from that date to the present. This data is available for periods prior to December 18, 2009. However, the components of the SDCI and the weighting of the components of the SDCI are established each month based on purely quantitative data that is not subject to revision based on other external factors. As a result, the table below reflects how the SDCI would have performed from December 31, 2007 through December 31, 2017 had it been in effect during such time period. The performance data does not reflect any reinvestment or distribution of profits, commission charges, management fees or other expenses that would have been incurred in connection with operating and managing a commodity pool designed to track the SDCI. Such fees and expenses would reduce the performance returns shown in the table below.

77

* PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Hypothetical Performance Results** for

the periods ending 2007 to 2017period from Year Ending 2013 through December 31, 2023

Year

    

Ending Level*

    

Annual Return

 

2013

 

1,678.73

(2.77)

%

2014

 

1,475.68

(12.10)

%

2015

 

1,265.58

(14.24)

%

2016

 

1,262.46

(0.25)

%

2017

 

1,364.38

8.07

%

2018

 

1,221.18

(10.50)

%

2019

 

1,219.05

(0.17)

%

2020

1,089.40

(10.64)

%

2021

 

1,468.49

34.80

%

2022

1,933.23

31.65

%

2023

1,964.25

1.60

%

Year Ending Level*  Annual Return 
2007  1,518.71   36.11%
2008  1,175.77   (22.58)%
2009  1,532.84   30.37%
2010  1,852.04   20.82%
2011  1,703.23   (8.03)%
2012  1,726.55   1.37%
2013  1,678.73   (2.77)%
2014  1,475.68   (12.10)%
2015  1,265.58   (14.24)%
2016  1,262.46   (0.25)%
2017  1,364.38   8.07%

* The “base level” for the SDCI was set at 100 on January 2, 1991. The “Ending Level” represents the value of the components of the SDCI on the last trading day of each year and is used to illustrate the cumulative performance of the SDCI. In addition to the actual performance of the SDCI, this chart includes the hypothetical performance of the SDCI had the changes to the composition of the SDCI, which became effective on December 24, 2020, been effective during the January 1, 2013 through December 24, 2020 period.

**PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

69 

SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total ReturnSM (“SDCI”) Year-Over-Year

Hypothetical Total Returns 2007(Year Ending 2013 through 12/31/2023)* YTD)

Graphic

Source: SummerHaven Index Management, Bloomberg

78

* In addition to 2017

 

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

the actual performance of the SDCI, this chart includes as “SDCI Hypothetical TR” the hypothetical performance of the SDCI had the changes to the composition of the SDCI, which became effective on December 24, 2020, been effective during the January 1, 2013 through December 24, 2020 period.

The following table and chart compare the hypothetical total return of the SDCI in comparison with the actual total return of three major indexes for the period from December 31, 1997 to December 31, 2017.2023.

  Hypothetical and Historical Results for the period
from December 31, 1997 through December 31, 2017
 
  BCOM TR  S&P GSCI TR  DB LCI
 OY TR
  SDCI 
Total return  16.42%  (16.42)%  174.68%  506.34%
Average annual return (total)  2.81%  3.06%  7.83%  11.40%
Annualized volatility  16.27%  22.69%  18.70%  14.89%
Annualized Sharpe ratio  0.05   0.04   0.30   0.61 

Source: SHIM, Bloomberg

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Hypothetical and Historical Results for the period

from December 31, 1997 through December 31, 2023

S&P GSCI

DB LCI OY

SDCI TR

    

BCOM TR

    

TR

    

TR

    

Actual

 

Total return

 

46.48

%  

9.40

%  

308.11

%  

772.92

%

Average annualized return (total)

 

3.27

%  

3.97

%  

8.03

%  

10.57

%

Annualized volatility

 

16.00

%  

23.06

%  

18.80

%  

15.39

%

Annualized Sharpe ratio

 

0.08

 

0.08

 

0.31

 

0.54

The table immediately above shows the performance of the SDCI from December 31, 1997 through December 31, 20172023 in comparison with three traditional commodities indices: the S&P GSCI Commodity Index (GSCI®(GSCI®) Total Return, Bloomberg Commodity Index Total ReturnSM (“BCOM TR”), and the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Total ReturnTM (“DB LCI OYTR”). The S&P GSCI®GSCI® Commodity Index Total Return is a composite index of commodity sector returns representing an unleveraged, long-only investment in commodity futures that is broadly diversified across the spectrum of commodities. The Bloomberg Commodity Index Total ReturnSM is currently composed of futures contracts on a diversified basket of commodities traded on U.S. exchanges. The Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Total ReturnTM is designed to reflect the performance of certain wheat, corn, light sweet crude oil, heating oil, gold and aluminum futures contracts plus the returns from investing in 3-month U.S. Treasury Bills. The data for the SDCI Total Return Index is derived by using the SDCI’s calculation methodology with historical prices for the futures contracts comprising the SDCI. The information about each of the indices comes from publicly-available material about such indices but is not designed to provide a thorough overview of the methodology of each index.

None of the indices has an investment objective identical to the SDCI. As a result, there are inherent limitations in comparing the performance of such indices against the SDCI. For more information about these indices and their methodologies, please refer to the material published by the sponsors of each such index which may be found on their websites. USCI is not responsible for any information found on such websites, and such information is not part of this annual report on Form 10-K.

In the table above, “Total Return” refers to the return of the relevant index from December 31, 1997 to December 31, 2017;2023; “Annualized Volatility” is a measure of the amount of variation or fluctuation in the returns of the relevant index. Annualized Volatility is calculated by taking the monthly standard deviation of the relevant index’s return and multiplying it by the square root of 12; and “Annualized Sharpe Ratio” is a measure of the total return of each relevant index adjusted by the risk-free interest rate (the 90-Day U.S. Treasury Bill yield) and the volatility of each index. Many investors consider volatility to be a measure of risk, and lower volatility of investment returns is considered a positive investment attribute as opposed to higher volatility. Annualized Sharpe Ratio is a standard measure for investors to compare two different investments or indexes that have different levels of volatility. If two indexes have the same total return, but one has lower Annualized Volatility, then its Annualized Sharpe Ratio will be higher. The higher the Annualized Sharpe Ratio, the better the risk-adjusted performance. Annualized Sharpe Ratio is calculated by taking the average monthly total return of the relevant index and subtracting the then current yield on the 90-Day U.S. Treasury Bill. The annualized return of this series is then divided by the Annualized Volatility of this series, and this result is the Annualized Sharpe Ratio for the relevant index. A higher Sharpe Ratio is not a guarantee that one investment or index will in the future produce better risk adjustment total returns, but USCF believes it is a useful tool for investors to consider when making investment decisions.

The following chart compares the hypothetical total return of the SDCI in comparison with the actual total return of three major indexes between December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2023, where the SDCI TR includes the initial composition of the index until December 24, 2020 when changes to the index composition became effective.


79

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Ten Year Comparison of Index Returns of the BCOM TR,

S&P GSCI TR, DB LCI OY TR, and the Hypothetical Returns of the SDCI TR (12/31/2013– 12/31/2023)

(12/31/2007 — 12/31/2017)

 

Graphic

Source: SHIM, Bloomberg

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS


The following chart compares the hypothetical total return of the SDCI in comparison with the actual total return of three major indexes over a five year period.period, where the SDCI TR includes the initial composition of the index until December 24, 2020 when changes to the index composition became effective.

80

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Five Year Comparison of Index Returns of the BCOM TR,

S&P GSCI TR, DB LCI OY TR, and the Hypothetical Returns of the SDCI TR (12/31/2018– 12/31/2023)

(12/31/2012 — 12/31/2017)Graphic

 

Source: SHIM, Bloomberg

SCI

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTSThe SCI is a single-commodity index designed to be an investment benchmark for copper as an asset class. The SCI is composed of copper futures contracts on the COMEX exchange. The SCI attempts to maximize backwardation and minimize contango while utilizing contracts in liquid portions of the futures curve.

The SCI is rules-based and is rebalanced monthly based on observable price signals described below in the section “Contract Selection and Weighting.” In this context, the term “rules-based” is meant to indicate that the composition of the SCI in any given month will be determined by quantitative formulas relating to the prices of the futures contracts that are included in the SCI. Such formulas are not subject to adjustment based on other factors.

The overall return on the SCI is generated by two components: (i) uncollateralized returns from the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts comprising the SCI, and (ii) a daily fixed income return reflecting the interest earned on hypothetical 3-month Treasuries, calculated using the weekly auction rate for 3-Month Treasuries published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. SHIM is the owner of the SCI.

81

Hypothetical Performance of the SCI

The table and chart below show the hypothetical performance of the SCI from December 31, 2007January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2017.2023.

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT CPER WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

Since the SCI was launched on November 4, 2010, there is no actual performance history of the SCI to present. However, the components of the SCI and the weighting of the components of the SCI are established each month based on purely quantitative data that is not subject to revisions based on other external factors. This data is available for periods prior to November 4, 2010. As a result, the table below reflects how the SCI would have performed from December 31, 2007 through December 31, 2017 had it been in effect during such time period. The performance data does not reflect any reinvestment or distribution profits, commission charges, management fees or other expenses that would have been incurred in connection with operating and managing a commodity pool designed to track the SCI. Such fees and expenses would reduce the performance returns shown in the table below.

72 

Hypothetical Performance Results for the SCI for the period

from 2007 to 2017

Year Ending Level*  Annual Return 
2007  1,059.17   16.25%
2008  497.18   (53.06)%
2009  1,153.12   131.93%
2010  1,491.95   29.38%
2011  1,164.51   (21.95)%
2012  1,123.15   5.04%
2013  1,114.30   (8.90)%
2014  937.33   (15.88)%
2015  704.39   (24.85)%
2016  815.94   15.84%
2017  1,069.01   31.02%

*The “base level” for the SCI was set at 100 on January 2, 1991. The “Ending Level” represents the value of the components of the SCI on the last trading day of each year and is used to illustrate the cumulative performance of the SCI.

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

SCI Year-Over-Year

Hypothetical Total Returns (12/31/07-12/31/17)Performance Results* for the SCI for the period from Year Ending December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2023

Year

    

Ending Level*

    

Annual Return

 

2013

 

1,114.30

 

(8.90)

%

2014

 

937.33

 

(15.88)

%

2015

 

704.39

 

(24.85)

%

2016

 

815.94

 

15.84

%

2017

 

1,069.01

 

31.02

%

2018

 

842.94

 

(21.15)

%

2019

 

905.32

 

7.40

%

2020

 

1,124.23

 

24.18

%

2021

 

1,422.52

 

26.53

%

2022

 

1,222.97

 

(14.03)

%

2023

1,294.82

5.88

%

 

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

 The “base level” for the SCI was set at 100 on January 2, 1991. The “Ending Level” represents the value of the components of the SCI on the last trading day of each year and is used to illustrate the cumulative performance of the SCI.

The following table compares the hypothetical total return of the SCI in comparison with the actual total return a major index and spot copper prices (less storage cost) from December 31, 1997 through December 31, 2017.2023.

82

  Hypothetical and Historical Results for the period
from December 31, 1997 through December 31, 2017
 
  BCOM
HG TR
  Spot Copper
(less storage)
  SCI TR 
Total return  308.51%  135.99%  582.64%
Average annual return (total)  13.62%  10.44%  16.95%
Annualized volatility  26.68%  25.76%  26.11%
Annualized Sharpe ratio  0.43   0.33   0.56 

Source: SHIM, Bloomberg

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

SummerHaven Copper Index (“SCI”) Year-Over-Year Hypothetical Total Returns (1/1/2013– 12/31/2023 YTD)

Graphic

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Hypothetical and Historical Results for the period

from December 31, 1997 through December 31, 2023

BCOM

Spot Copper

SCI TR

    

Copper TR

    

(less storage)

    

Actual

Total return

 

444.80

%  

393.72

%  

726.83

%

Average annualized return (total)

 

12.04

%  

12.53

%  

14.15

%

Annualized volatility

 

25.34

%  

31.77

%  

24.85

%

Annualized Sharpe ratio

 

0.39

 

0.33

 

0.48

Source: SHIM, Bloomberg

The table above shows the performance of the SCI from December 31, 1997 through December 31, 20172023 in comparison with a traditional commodity index and spot copper prices: the Bloomberg Copper Subindex Total ReturnSM and spot copper prices less warehouse storage rents. The Bloomberg Copper Subindex Total ReturnSM includes the contract in the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return that relates to a single commodity, copper (currently the Copper High Grade futures contract traded on the COMEX). The data for the SCI Total Return Index is derived by using the SCI’s calculation methodology with historical prices for the futures contracts comprising the SCI. The information about the index above comes from publicly-available material about such index but is not designed to provide a thorough overview of the methodology of such index. The index noted above does not have investment objectives identical to the SCI. As a result, there are inherent limitations in comparing such performance against the SCI. For more information about the index and its methodologies, please refer to the material published by the sponsor of the Bloomberg Copper Subindex Total Return which may be found on its website. In addition to the actual performance of the SCI, this chart includes as “SCI Hypothetical TR” the hypothetical performance of the SCI had the changes to the composition of the SCI, which became effective on January 1, 2021, been effective during the period from December 31, 1997 through December 31, 2020. USCF is not responsible for any information found on such website, and such information is not part of this annual report on Form 10-K.


83

In the table above, “Total Return” refers to the return of the relevant index from December 31, 1997 to December 31, 2017;2023; “Annualized Volatility” is a measure of the amount of variation or fluctuation in the returns of the relevant index. Annualized Volatility is calculated by taking the monthly standard deviation of the relevant index’s return and multiplying it by the square root of 12; and “Annualized Sharpe Ratio” is a measure of the total return of each relevant index adjusted by the risk-free interest rate (the 90-Day U.S. Treasury Bill yield) and the volatility of each index. Many investors consider volatility to be a measure of risk, and lower volatility of investment returns is considered a positive investment attribute as opposed to higher volatility. Annualized Sharpe Ratio is a standard measure for investors to compare two different investments or indexes that have different levels of volatility. If two indexes have the same total return, but one has lower Annualized Volatility, then its Annualized Sharpe Ratio will be higher. The higher the Annualized Sharpe Ratio, the better the risk-adjusted performance. Annualized Sharpe Ratio is calculated by taking the average monthly total return of the relevant index and subtracting the then current yield on the 90-Day U.S. Treasury Bill. The annualized return of this series is then divided by the Annualized Volatility of this series, and this result is the Annualized Sharpe Ratio for the relevant index. A higher Sharpe Ratio is not a guarantee that one investment or index will in the future produce better risk adjustment total returns, but USCF believes it is a useful tool for investors to consider when making investment decisions.

The following chart compares the hypothetical total return of the SCI in comparison with the actual return of three major indexes over a ten year period.

Ten Year Comparison of Index Returnsbetween December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2023, where the SCI includes the original composition of the S&P GSCI Copper TR,

BCOM HG TR, Spot Copper price, Spot Copper Price less Storage Cost,index until the changes described above and

became effective on January 1, 2021, from which point then the Hypothetical Returnsrevised composition of the SCI (12/31/2007-12/31/2017)index is included.

 

Source: SHIM, Bloomberg, LME

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Ten Year Comparison of Index Returns of


BCOM HG TR, Spot Copper Price, Spot Copper Price less Storage Cost, and the Hypothetical Returns of the SCI TR (12/31/2013– 12/31/2023)

Graphic

Source: SHIM, Bloomberg, LME

The following chart compares the hypothetical total return of the SCI in comparison with the actual total return of two major indices and spot copper prices (less storage cost) over a five year period.period , where the SCI includes the original composition of the index until the

84

changes described above and became effective on January 1, 2021, from which point then the revised composition of the index is included.

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Five Year Comparison of Index Returns of the S&P GSCI Copper TR,

BCOM HG TR, Spot Copper price,Price, Spot Copper Price less Storage

Cost, and the Hypothetical Returns of the SCI (12/31/2012-12/2018- 12/31/2017)2023)

 

Graphic

Source: SHIM, Bloomberg, LME

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2021

SDAI

The table and chart below show the hypothetical performancecomparison of the SDAI fromfiscal years ended December 31, 2007 through December 31, 2017.

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT USAG WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

Since the SDAI was launched on September 23, 2010, there is only actual performance history of the SDAI from that date to the present. However, the components of the SDAI2022 and the weighting of the components of the SDAI are established each month based on purely quantitative data that is not subject to revisions based on other external factors. This data is available for periods prior to September 23, 2010. As a result, the table below reflects how the SDAI would have performed from December 31, 2007 through December 31, 2017 had it been in effect during such time period. The performance data does not reflect any reinvestment or distribution of profits, commission charges, management fees or other expenses that would have been incurred in connection with operating and managing a commodity pool designed to track the SDAI. Such fees and expenses would reduce the performance returns shown2021 can be found in the table below.

75 

Hypothetical Performance Results for the period

from December 31, 2007 through December 31, 2017

Year Ending Level*  Annual Return 
2007  315.85   21.59%
2008  261.02   (17.36)%
2009  282.24   8.13%
2010  377.90   33.89%
2011  348.78   (7.71)%
2012  360.61   3.39%
2013  324.10   (10.12)%
2014  329.88   1.78%
2015  285.01   (13.60)%
2016  273.11   (4.18)%
2017  253.46   (7.19)%

*The “base level” for the SDAI was set at 100 on January 2, 1991. The “Ending Level” represents the value of the components of the Index on the last trading day of each year and is used to illustrate the cumulative performance of the Index.

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Summerhaven Dynamic Agriculture Index Year-Over-Year

Hypothetical Total Returns (12/31/2007-12/31/2017)

 

Source: SHIM, Bloomberg

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

The following table and chart compare the hypothetical total return of the SDAI in comparison with the actual total return of three major indexes from December 31, 1997 through December 31, 2017.

  Hypothetical and Historical Results for the period from
December 31, 1997 through December 31, 2017
 
  BCOM AG TR  S&P GSCI
Ag TR
  DB LCI OY
Ag TR
  SDAI 
Total return  (45.17)%  (70.01)%  (28.94)%  17.62%
Average annual return (total)  (1.44)%  (4.39)%  (0.44)%  1.76%
Annualized volatility  19.81%  20.58%  19.07%  14.87%
Annualized Sharpe ratio  (0.17)  (0.30)  (0.13)  (0.01)

The table above shows the performance of the SDAI from December 31, 1997 through December 31, 2017 in comparison with three traditional agricultural commodities indices: the S&P GSCI® Agriculture Index Total Return, Bloomberg Agriculture Subindex Total ReturnSM, and the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Agriculture Total ReturnTM. The S&P GSCI® Agriculture Index Total Return comprises the commodities: Wheat (Chicago and Kansas), Corn, Soybeans, Cotton, Sugar, Coffee, and Cocoa, and is part of a series of sub-indices representing components of the S&P GSCI. The Bloomberg Agriculture Subindex Total ReturnSM is currently composed of seven futures contracts on agricultural commodities traded on U.S. exchanges. The Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Agriculture Total ReturnTM is designed to reflect the performance of certain corn, wheat, soybean and sugar futures contracts plus the returns from investing in 3 month U.S. Treasury Bills. The data for the SDAI is derived by using the SDAI’s calculation methodology with historical prices for the futures contracts comprising the SDAI. The information about each of the indices comes from publicly-available material about such indices but is not designed to provide a thorough overview of the methodology of each index. None of the indices have investment objectives identical to the SDAI. As a result, there are inherent limitations in comparing the performance of such indices against the SDAI. For more information about these indices and their methodologies, please refer to the material published by the sponsors of each such index which may be found on their websites. USAG is not responsible for any information found on such website, and such information is not part of this Trust’s annual report on Form 10-K.

In10-K for the table above, “Total Return” refers to the return of the relevant index fromfiscal year ended December 31, 1997 through December 31, 2017; “Annualized Volatility”2022 located within Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which is a measure of the amount of variation or fluctuation in the returns of the relevant index. Annualized Volatility is calculatedincorporated by taking the monthly standard deviation of the relevant index’s return and multiplying it by the square root of 12; and “Annualized Sharpe Ratio” is a measure of the total return of each relevant index adjusted by the risk-free interest rate (the 90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill yield) and the volatility of each index. Many investors consider volatility to be a measure of risk, and lower volatility of investment returns is considered a positive investment attribute as opposed to higher volatility. Annualized Sharpe Ratio is a standard measure for investors to compare two different investments or indexes that have different levels of volatility. If two indexes have the same total return, but one has lower Annualized Volatility, then its Annualized Sharpe Ratio will be higher. The higher the Annualized Sharpe Ratio, the better the risk-adjusted performance. Annualized Sharpe Ratio is calculated by taking the average monthly total return of the relevant index and subtracting the then current yield on the 90 Day U.S. Treasury Bill. The annualized return of this series is then divided by the Annualized Volatility of this series, and this result is the Annualized Sharpe Ratio for the relevant index. A higher Sharpe Ratio is not a guarantee that one investment or index will in the future produce better risk adjustment total returns, but USCF believes it is a useful tool for investors to consider when making investment decisions.

Ten Year Comparison of Index Returns of the BCOM AG TR, S&P GSCI Ag TR,

DB LCI OY Ag TR, and the Hypothetical Returns of the SDAI

(12/31/2007-12/31/2017)

 

Source: SHIM, Bloomberg

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS


The following chart compares the hypothetical total return of the SDAI in comparison with the actual total return of three major indexes over a five year period.

Five Year Comparison of Index Returns of the BCOM AG TR, S&P GSCI Ag TR,

DB LCI OY Ag TR, and the Hypothetical Returns of the SDAI

(12/31/2012-12/31/2017)

 

Source: SHIM, Bloomberg

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

reference herein.

Critical Accounting Policies

Preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures in compliance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the application of appropriate accounting rules and guidance, as well as the use of estimates. The Trust’s application of these policies involves judgments and actual results may differ from the estimates used.

USCF has evaluated the nature and types of estimates that it makes in preparing the Trust’s financial statements and related disclosures and has determined that the valuation of Applicable Interests, which are not traded on a United States or internationally recognized futures exchange (such as forward contracts and OTC swaps) involves a critical accounting policy. The values which are used by each Trust Series for its Futures Contracts are provided by its commodity broker who uses market prices when available, while OTC swaps are valued based on the present value of estimated future cash flows that would be received from or paid to a third party in settlement of these derivative contracts prior to their delivery date and valued on a daily basis. In addition, each Trust Series estimates interest

85

income on a daily basis using prevailing rates earned on its cash and cash equivalents. These estimates are adjusted to the actual amount received on a monthly basis and the difference, if any, is not considered material.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

None of the Trust Series has made, and does not anticipate making, use of borrowings or other lines of credit to meet its obligations. Each Trust Series has met, and it is anticipated that each Trust Series will continue to meet, its liquidity needs in the normal course of business from the proceeds of the sale of its investments, or from the Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents that it intends to hold at all times. Each Trust Series’ liquidity needs include: redeeming shares, providing margin deposits for its existing Futures Contracts or the purchase of additional Futures Contracts and posting collateral for its OTC swaps, if applicable, and payment of its expenses, summarized below under Contractual Obligations.”Obligations.”

Each Trust Series currently generates cash primarily from: (i) the sale of Creation Baskets and (ii) income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents. Each Trust Series has allocated substantially all of its net assets to trading in Applicable Interests. Each Trust Series invests in Applicable Interests to the fullest extent possible without being leveraged or unable to satisfy its current or potential margin or collateral obligations with respect to its investments in Applicable Interests. A significant portion of each Trust Series’ NAV is held in Treasuries, cash and cash equivalents that are used as margin and as collateral for its trading in Applicable Interests. The balance of the assets is held in each Trust Series’ account at the Custodian and in investments in Treasuries at the FCM.one or more FCMs. Income received from any investments in money market funds and Treasuries by a Trust Series will be paid to such Trust Series. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the2023, each Trust Series’ expenses did not exceed the income earned or the cash earned from the sale of Creation Baskets and the redemption of Redemption Baskets. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Trust Series’ expenses exceeded the income each Trust Series earned and the cash earned from the sale of Creation Baskets and the redemption of Redemption Baskets. ToBaskets exceeded the extent expenses exceed income, the Trust Series’ NAV was negatively impacted.expenses.


Each Trust Series’ investments in Applicable Interests may be subject to periods of illiquidity because of market conditions, regulatory considerations and other reasons. For example, most commodity exchanges limit the fluctuations in futures contractcontracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily limits.” During a single day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. Once the price of a futures contract has increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit, positions in the contracts can neither be taken nor liquidated unless the traders are willing to effect trades at or within the specified daily limit. Such market conditions could prevent a Trust Series from promptly liquidating its positions in Futures Contracts. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, none of the Trust Series purchased or liquidated any of its positions while daily limits were in effect; however, no Trust Series can predict whether such an event may occur in the future.

Prior to the initial offering of each Trust Series, all payments with respect to each Trust Series’ expenses are paid by USCF. None of the Trust Series has an obligation or intention to refund such payments made by USCF. USCF is under no obligation to pay any Trust Series’ future expenses. Since the initial offering of shares, each Trust Series has been responsible for expenses relating to: (i) management fees, (ii) brokerage fees and commissions, (iii) ongoing registration expenses in connection with offers and sales of its shares subsequent to the initial offering, (iv) other expenses, including tax reporting costs, (v) the fees of the Trustee in connection with its services as Delaware trustee of the Trust, (vi) fees and expenses of the independent directors of USCF and (vii) other extraordinary expenses not in the ordinary course of business, while USCF has been responsible for expenses relating to the fees of the Trust Series’ Marketing Agent, Administrator and Custodian, the trading advisory and licensing fees of SummerHaven and offering expenses relating to the initial offering of shares of each Trust Series. If USCF and each Trust Series are unsuccessful in raising sufficient funds to cover these respective expenses or in locating any other source of funding, one or more of the Trust Series could terminate and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

Market Risk

Trading in Applicable Interests, such as Futures Contracts, involves each Trust Series entering into contractual commitments to purchase or sell specified amounts of commodities at a specified date in the future. The aggregate market value of the contracts will significantly exceed each Trust Series’ future cash requirements since each Trust Series intends to close out its open positions prior to settlement. As a result, each Trust Series is generally only subject to the risk of loss arising from the change in value of the contracts. Each Trust Series considers the “fair value” of its derivative instruments to be the unrealized gain or loss on the contracts. The market risk associated with each Trust Series’ commitments to purchase a specific commodity will be limited to the aggregate market value of the contracts held.

Each Trust Series’ exposure to market risk depends on a number of factors, including the markets for commodities, the volatility of interest rates and foreign exchange rates, the liquidity of the Applicable Interest markets and the relationships among the contracts held by each such Trust Series. The limited experience that each Trust Series has had in utilizing its model to trade in Applicable Interests in

86

a manner intended to track the changes in the Applicable Index, as well as drastic market occurrences, could ultimately lead to the loss of all or substantially all of an investor’s capital.

Credit Risk

When a Trust Series enters into Futures Contracts and Other Related Investments, it is exposed to the credit risk that the counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations. The counterparty for the Futures Contracts traded on the Futures Exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with the particular exchange. In general, in addition to margin required to be posted by the clearinghouse in connection with cleared trades, clearinghouses are backed by their members who may be required to share in the financial burden resulting from the nonperformance of one of their members and, therefore, this additional member support should significantly reduce credit risk. The Trust Series are not currently a member of any clearinghouse. Some foreign exchanges are not backed by their clearinghouse members but may be backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions. Unlike in the case of exchange-traded Futures Contracts, the counterparty to an OTC contract is generally a single bank or other financial institution. As a result, there will be greater counterparty credit risk in OTC transactions. There can be no assurance that any counterparty, clearinghouse, or their members or their financial backers will satisfy their obligations to a Trust Series in such circumstances.

USCF attempts to manage the credit risk of each Trust Series by following various trading limitations and policies. In particular, each Trust Series generally posts margin and/or holds liquid assets that are approximately equal to the market value of its obligations to counterparties under the Futures Contracts and Other Related Investments it holds. USCF has implemented procedures that include, but are not limited to, executing and clearing trades and entering into OTC transactions only with creditworthy parties and/or requiring the posting of collateral or margin by such parties for the benefit of each Trust Series to limit its credit exposure. Each Trust Series’ commodity broker, or any other broker that may be retained by a Trust Series in the future, when acting as the Trust Series’ FCM in accepting orders to purchase or sell Futures Contracts on United States exchanges, is required by CFTC regulations to separately account for and segregate as belonging to a Trust Series, all assets of a Trust Series relating to domestic Futures Contracts trading. FCMs are not allowed to commingle a Trust Series’ assets with their other assets. In addition, the CFTC requires commodity brokersFCMs to hold in a secure account a Trust Series’ assets related to foreign Futures Contracts trading. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the only foreign exchanges on which2023, USCI made investments wereon the ICE Futures, which is a London based futures exchange, and the LME, which is a London based metal commodities exchange. Those Futures Contracts are denominated in U.S. dollars.Metal Exchange. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, CPER did not makemade investments on any foreign exchanges. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the only foreign exchange on which USAG made investments was the ICE Futures. Such Futures Contracts are denominated in Canadian dollars and U.S. dollars.


London Metal Exchange. In the future, a Trust Series may purchase OTC swaps, see“Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in this annual report on Form 10-K for a discussion of OTC swaps.

As of December 31, 2017,2023, each of USCI CPER and USAGCPER held cash deposits and investments in Treasuries and money market funds in the amount of $497,389,644, $10,097,982$172,109,309 and $1,753,032,$127,101,194, respectively, with the custodian and FCM.FCMs. Some or all of these amounts held by a custodian or an FCM, as applicable, may be subject to loss should the Trust Series’ custodian and/or FCM,FCMs, as applicable, cease operations.

Off Balance Sheet Financing

As of December 31, 2017,2023, neither the Trust nor any Trust Series had any loan guarantee, credit support or other off-balance sheet arrangementarrangements of any kind other than agreements entered into in the normal course of business, which may include indemnification provisions relating to certain risks that service providers undertake in performing services which are in the best interests of any Trust Series. While each Trust Series’ exposure under these indemnification provisions cannot be estimated, they are not expected to have a material impact on any Trust Series’ financial position.

European Sovereign Debt

None of the Trust Series had direct exposure to European sovereign debt as of December 31, 2017 or had direct exposure to European sovereign debt as of the filing of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Redemption Basket Obligation

In order to meet its investment objective and pay its contractual obligations described below, each Trust Series requires liquidity to redeem shares, which redemptions must be in blocks of 50,000 shares called “Redemption Baskets.” Each Trust Series has to date satisfied this obligation by paying from the cash or cash equivalents it holds or through the sale of its Treasuries in an amount proportionate to the number of shares being redeemed. Authorized Participants pay each Trust Series $350 for each order placed to create one or more Creation Baskets or to redeem one or more Redemption Baskets.

Contractual Obligations

The Trust’s (and each series thereunder) primary contractual obligations are with USCF and certain other service providers. USCF, inIn return for its services, USCF is entitled to a management fee calculated as a fixed percentage of a Trust Series’ NAV. Effective January 1, 2016, USCF permanently lowered theThe management fee payable to USCF is 0.80% (80 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for USCI and 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for both CPER and USAG.CPER. Ongoing fees, costs and expenses of its operation for which a Trust Series is responsible include:

brokerage and other fees and commissions incurred in connection with the trading activities of each Trust Series;

87

Contents

expenses incurred in connection with registering additional shares of each Trust Series or offering shares of each Trust Series after the time any shares of each Trust Series have begun trading on the NYSE Arca;

the routine expenses associated with distribution, including printing and mailing, of any monthly, annual and other reports to shareholders required by applicable U.S. federal and state regulatory authorities;

payment for routine services of the Trustee, legal counsel and independent accountants;

payment for fees associated with tax accounting and reporting, routine accounting, bookkeeping, whether performed by an outside service provider or by affiliates of USCF;

Postage and insurance, including directors’ and officers’ liability insurance;

costs and expenses associated with investor relations and services;

the payment of any distributions related to redemption of shares;

payment of all federal, state, local or foreign taxes payable on the income, assets or operations of each Trust Series and the preparation of all tax returns related thereto; and

extraordinary expenses (including, but not limited to, indemnification of any person against liabilities and obligations to the extent permitted by law and required under the Trust Agreement and the bringing and defending of actions at law or in equity and otherwise engaging in the conduct of litigation and the incurring of legal expense and the settlement of claims and litigation).

expenses incurred in connection with registering additional shares of each Trust Series or offering shares of each Trust Series after the time any shares of each Trust Series have begun trading on the NYSE Arca;
the routine expenses associated with distribution, including printing and mailing, of any monthly, annual and other reports to shareholders required by applicable U.S. federal and state regulatory authorities;
payment for routine services of the Trustee, legal counsel and independent accountants;
payment for fees associated with tax accounting and reporting, routine accounting, bookkeeping, whether performed by an outside service provider or by affiliates of USCF;
postage and insurance, including directors’ and officers’ liability insurance;
costs and expenses associated with investor relations and services;
the payment of any distributions related to redemption of shares;
payment of all federal, state, local or foreign taxes payable on the income, assets or operations of each Trust Series and the preparation of all tax returns related thereto; and
extraordinary expenses (including, but not limited to, indemnification of any person against liabilities and obligations to the extent permitted by law and required under the Trust Agreement and the bringing and defending of actions at law or in equity and otherwise engaging in the conduct of litigation and the incurring of legal expense and the settlement of claims and litigation).

While USCF has agreed to pay registration fees to the SEC, FINRA, NYSE Arca or any other regulatory agency or exchange in connection with the initial offer and sale of the shares and the legal, printing, accounting and other expenses associated with such registration, each Trust Series is responsible for any registration fees and related expenses incurred in connection with any subsequent offer and sale of its shares after the initial offering of shares. In addition, any Trust Series, in its Registration Statement, may provide for different allocation of expenses among the Sponsor and such Trust Series, in each case solely with respect to such Trust Series.

Each Trust Series pays its own brokerage and other transaction costs. Each Trust Series pays fees to FCMs in connection with its transactions in Futures Contracts. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, FCM fees were approximately 0.10% of average daily total net assets for USCI, approximately 0.07% of average daily total net assets for CPER,USCI, and approximately 0.10%0.03% of average daily total net assets for USAG.CPER. In general, transaction costs on OTC Applicable Interests and on Treasuries and other short-term securities are embedded in the purchase or sale price of the instrument being purchased or sold, and may not readily be estimated. USCF had voluntarily agreed to pay certain expenses normally borne by USCI to the extent that such expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of USCI’s NAV, on an annualized basis, through March 31, 2011. As of March 31,June 30, 2011 thewhen such expense waiver was no longer in effect for USCI.terminated. USCF has voluntarily agreed to pay certain expenses typically borne by each of CPER and USAG to the extent that such expenses exceed 0.15% (15 basis points) of each of CPER’s or USAG’s NAV, on an annualized basis. USCF can terminate this agreement at any time in its sole discretion. If this Agreement were terminated such expense waiver as of April 30, 2021. As a result, the Annual Fund Operating Expenses could increase,increased, which would negatively impact your total return from an investment in CPER and USAG.CPER. This voluntary expense waiver iswas in addition to those amounts USCF is contractually obligated to pay as described in Note 5 to the financial statements of the Trust.

Trust and terminated on April 30, 2021.

The parties cannot anticipate the amount of payments that will be required under these arrangements for future periods, as each Trust Series’ NAVs and trading levels to meet its investment objective will not be known until a future date. These agreements are effective for a specific term agreed upon by the parties with an option to renew, or, in some cases, are in effect for the duration of a Trust Series’ existence. Either party may terminate these agreements earlier for certain reasons described in the agreements.

As of December 31, 2017,2023, USCI’s portfolio consisted of 15,3864,766 Futures Contracts traded on the Futures Exchanges and CPER’s portfolio consisted of 153 Futuresheld 1,342 Contracts traded on the COMEX, and USAG’s portfolio consisted of 70 Futures Contracts traded on the Futures Exchanges.COMEX. For a list of each of USCI’s CPER’s and USAG’sCPER’s current holdings, please see www.uscfinvestments.com. See “Portfolio Holdings” for a complete list of Futures Contracts held by each of USCI, CPER and USAG during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Commodity Price Risk.

Risk

USCI USAG, and CPER are exposed to commodity price risk. In particular, each Trust Series is exposed to commodity risk of the commodities that comprise the Applicable Index for such Trust Series through its holdings of Futures Contracts together with any other derivatives in which it may invest, which are discussed below. As a result, fluctuations in the value of the Futures Contracts that each Trust Series holds in its portfolio, as described in“Contractual Obligations”under Item 2.7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOperations” ,”above, are expected to directly affect the value of the shares of the Trust Series.

88

OTC Contract Risk

Currently, OTC transactions are subject to changing regulation.

USCI USAG, and CPER may purchase OTC Commodity-Related Interests, Agriculture-Related Interests and Copper-Related Interests, such as forward contracts or swap or spot contracts, respectively.contracts. Unlike most exchange-traded futures contracts or exchange-traded options on such futures, each party to an OTC swap bears the credit risk that the other party may not be able to perform its obligations under its contract.

The Trust, on behalf of each Trust Series, may enter into certain transactions where an OTC component is exchanged for a corresponding futures contract (“Exchange for Related Position” or “EFRP” transactions). In the most common type of EFRP transaction entered into by the Trust, the OTC component is the purchase or sale of one or more baskets of a Trust Series shares. These EFRP transactions may expose a Trust Series to counterparty risk during the interim period between the executionsexecution of the OTC component and the exchange for a corresponding futures contract. Generally, the counterparty risk from the EFRP transaction will exist only on the day of execution.

Swap transactions, like other financial transactions, involvesinvolve a variety of significant risks. The specific risks presented by a particular swap transaction necessarily depend upon the terms and circumstances of the transaction. In general, however, all swap transactions involve some combination of market risk, credit risk, counterparty credit risk, funding risk, liquidity risk and operational risk.

Highly customized swap transactions in particular may increase liquidity risk, which may result in a suspension of redemptions. Highly leveraged transactions may experience substantial gains or losses in value as a result of relatively small changes in the value or level of an underlying or related market factor.

In evaluating the risks and contractual obligations associated with a particular swap transaction, it is important to consider that a swap transaction may be modified or terminated only by mutual consent of the original parties and subject to agreement on individually negotiated terms. Therefore, it may not be possible for USCF to modify, terminate or offset a Trust Series’ obligations or its exposure to the risks associated with a transaction prior to its scheduled termination date.

To reduce the credit risk that arises in connection with such contracts, a Trust Series will generally enter into an agreement with each counterparty based on the Master Agreement published by ISDAthe International Swaps and Derivatives Association that provides for the netting of its overall exposure to its counterparty, if the counterparty is unable to meet its obligations to the Trust Series due to the occurrence of a specified event, such as the insolvency of the counterparty.


A Trust Series assesses or reviews, as appropriate, the creditworthiness of each potential or existing counterparty to an OTC contract pursuant to guidelines approved by USCF’s Board.board of directors (the “Board”). Furthermore, USCF on behalf of a Trust Series only enters into OTC contractsswaps with counterparties who are, or are affiliates of, (a) banks regulated by a United States federal bank regulator, (b) broker-dealers regulated by the SEC, (c) insurance companies domiciled in the United States, or (d) producers, users or traders of energy, whether or not regulated by the CFTC. Any entity acting as a counterparty shall be regulated in either the United States or the United Kingdom unless otherwise approved by the Board after consultation with its legal counsel. Existing counterparties are also reviewed periodically by USCF. A Trust Series will also require that the counterparty be highly rated and/or provide collateral or other credit support. Even if collateral is used to reduce counterparty credit risk, sudden changes in the value of OTC transactions may leave a party open to financial risk due to a counterparty default since the collateral held may not cover a party’s exposure on the transaction in such situations.

In general, valuing OTC derivatives is less certain than valuing actively traded financial instruments such as exchange-traded futures contracts and securities or cleared swaps because the price and terms on which such OTC derivatives are entered into or can be terminated are individually negotiated, and those prices and terms may not reflect the best price or terms available from other sources. In addition, while market makers and dealers generally quote indicative prices or terms for entering into or terminating OTC swaps, they typically are not contractually obligated to do so, particularly if they are not a party to the transaction. As a result, it may be difficult to obtain an independent value for an outstanding OTC derivatives transaction.

During the 12twelve month reporting period ended December 31, 2017,2023, no Trust Series had any OTC activities.

Each Trust Series anticipates that the use of Other Related Investments together with its investments in Futures Contracts will produce price and total return results that closely track the investment goals of such Trust Series. However, there can be no assurance of this. OTC swaps may result in higher transaction-related expenses than the brokerage commissions paid in connection with the purchase of Futures Contracts, which may impact a Trust Series’ ability to successfully track its Applicable Index.


89

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

USCF assessed the effectiveness of the Trust’s and each Trust Series’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2023. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission inInternal Control Integrated Framework (2013). Based on the assessment, USCF believes that, as of December 31,  2017,2023, the internal control over financial reporting for the Trust and each Trust Series is effective.


91

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Sponsor and Shareholders of

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition, including the schedules of investments, of United States Commodity Index Funds Trust (the “Trust”), theincluding United States Commodity Index Fund theand United States Copper Index Fund, andeach a Series of the United States Agriculture Index Fund (collectively, the “Series”),Trust, in total and for theeach Series, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, including the schedule of investments as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and2023, the related statements of operations, changes in capital, and changes in shares outstanding and cash flows for the yearsyear then ended, December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). We also have audited the Trust’s and theits Series’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of United States Commodity Index Fundsthe Trust the United States Commodity Index Fund, the United States Copper Index Fund and the United States Agriculture Index Fundits Series as of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2023 and the results of their operations, changes in capital, and their cash flows for the yearsyear then ended, December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Also, in our opinion, the Trust and theits Series maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172023 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

The Trust’s and its Series’ financial statements and internal control over financial reporting for the years ended December 31, 2022, and prior, were audited by other auditors whose report dated February 27, 2023, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

Opinions

The Trust’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Trust’s and its Series’ financial statements and an opinion on the Trust’s and theits Series’ internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)(“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Trust and theits Series in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

85 92

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

Critical audit matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. We determined that there are no critical audit matters.

We have served as the Trust’s auditor since 2023.

/s/ Cohen & Company, Ltd.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

February 29, 2024

93

GraphicSPICER JEFFRIES LLP

Certified Public Accountants

4601 DTC BOULEVARD • SUITE 700

DENVER, COLORADO 80237

TELEPHONE: (303) 753-1959

FAX: (303) 753-0338

www.spicerjeffries.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Sponsor and Shareholders of

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying statement of financial condition of United States Commodity Index Funds Trust (the “Trust”) and its Series including United States Commodity Index Fund, and United States Copper Index Fund, in total and for each Series as of December 31, 2022, including the schedule of investments as of December 31, 2022, and the related statements of operations, changes in capital and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). We also have audited the Trust’s and its Series’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Trust and its Series as of December 31, 2022, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Trust and its Series maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

Basis for Opinion

The Trust’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Trust’s and its Series’ financial statements and an opinion on the Trust’s and its Series’ internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Trust and its Series in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Graphic

94

Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A Trust’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A Trust’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly  reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Trust are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Trust; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Trust’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

Critical audit matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. We determined that there are no critical audit matters.

/s/ Spicer Jeffries LLP

We have served as the Trust’s auditor since 2009.

Greenwood Village,Denver, Colorado

March 14, 2018February 29, 2024

86 

95

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Financial Condition

At December 31, 20172023 and 2016

December 31, 2022

United States Commodity Index Fund

    

December 31, 2023

    

December 31, 2022

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $159,067,804 and $233,130,983, respectively) (Notes 2 and 6)

$

159,067,804

$

233,130,983

Equity in trading accounts:

  

Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $13,041,505 and $12,926,388, respectively)

 

13,041,505

  

 

12,926,388

Unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts

 

(3,305,080)

  

 

9,398,730

Dividends receivable

 

268,784

  

 

833,949

Interest receivable

 

333,401

  

 

64,059

Prepaid insurance

14,764

11,886

  

Total Assets

$

169,421,178

$

256,365,995

  

Liabilities and Capital

  

Management fees payable (Note 4)

$

121,486

  

$

178,702

Professional fees payable

 

264,875

  

 

340,128

Brokerage commissions payable

 

3,955

  

 

3,955

Directors’ fees payable

4,294

  

5,696

  

Total Liabilities

 

394,610

  

 

528,481

  

Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 4, 5 & 6)

  

  

Capital

  

Sponsor

 

  

 

Shareholders

169,026,568

  

255,837,514

Total Capital

 

169,026,568

  

 

255,837,514

  

Total Liabilities and Capital

$

169,421,178

$

256,365,995

  

Shares outstanding

3,000,000

  

4,550,000

Net asset value per share

$

56.34

$

56.23

Market value per share

$

56.28

$

56.28

  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Assets        
Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $393,488,946 and $601,266,026, respectively)  
      (Notes 2 and 6)
 $393,488,946  $601,266,026 
Short-Term Investments (at cost $71,291,769 and $—, respectively) (Note 6)  71,291,769   —  
Equity in trading accounts:        
Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $32,608,929 and $40,050,520, respectively)  32,608,929   40,050,520 
Unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts  6,872,970   2,055,460 
Interest receivable  13,598   1,261 
ETF transaction fees receivable  350   350 
         
Total assets $504,276,562  $643,373,617 
         
Liabilities and Capital        
Payable for shares redeemed $2,120,429  $6,015,383 
Management fees payable (Note 4)  326,005   445,163 
Professional fees payable  539,417   560,068 
Brokerage commissions payable  43,305   54,015 
Directors' fees and insurance payable  5,496   6,164 
         
Total liabilities  3,034,652   7,080,793 
         
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 4, 5 and 6)        
         
Capital        
Sponsor      
Shareholders  501,241,910   636,292,824 
Total Capital  501,241,910   636,292,824 
         
Total liabilities and capital $504,276,562  $643,373,617 
         
Shares outstanding  11,800,000   15,900,000 
Net asset value per share $42.48  $40.02 
Market value per share $42.53  $40.00 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

87 

96

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Financial Condition

At December 31, 20172023 and 2016

December 31, 2022

United States Copper Index Fund

    

December 31, 2023

    

December 31, 2022

Assets

 

  

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $125,475,483 and $158,307,387, respectively) (Notes 2 and 6)

$

125,475,483

$

158,307,387

Equity in trading accounts:

 

  

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $1,625,711 and $6,906,529, respectively)

 

1,625,711

 

6,906,529

Unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts

 

3,996,334

 

3,972,853

Dividends receivable

 

148,433

 

549,553

Interest receivable

 

332,445

 

35,104

Prepaid professional fees

9,610

6,112

Prepaid insurance

4,521

13,045

 

  

 

  

Total Assets

$

131,592,537

$

169,790,583

 

  

 

  

Liabilities and Capital

 

  

 

  

Management fees payable (Note 4)

$

71,188

$

94,784

Professional fees payable

 

160,958

 

152,375

Directors’ fees payable

 

7,049

 

7,049

 

 

Total Liabilities

 

239,195

 

254,208

 

  

 

  

Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 4, 5 & 6)

 

  

 

  

 

 

Capital

 

  

 

  

Sponsor

 

 

Shareholders

131,353,342

169,536,375

Total Capital

 

131,353,342

 

169,536,375

 

 

Total Liabilities and Capital

$

131,592,537

$

169,790,583

 

  

 

  

Shares outstanding

5,450,000

7,350,000

Net asset value per share

$

24.10

$

23.07

Market value per share

$

24.14

$

23.09

  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Assets        
Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $7,124,096 and $5,387,655, respectively)  
      (Notes 2 and 6)
 $7,124,096  $5,387,655 
Short-Term Investments (at cost $2,175,807 and $—, respectively) (Note 6)  2,175,807    
Equity in trading accounts:        
Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $798,079 and $253,165, respectively)  798,079   253,165 
Unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts  881,938   88,575 
Receivable for shares sold  2,104,935    
Receivable from Sponsor (Note 4)  40,153   75,640 
Interest receivable  1,137    
Directors' fees and insurance receivable  35    
ETF transaction fees receivable  350    
         
Total assets $13,126,530  $5,805,035 
         
Liabilities and Capital        
Payable due to Broker $442,429  $ 
Management fees payable (Note 4)  5,282   3,038 
Professional fees payable  48,916   77,296 
Directors' fees and insurance payable     47 
         
Total liabilities  496,627   80,381 
         
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 4, 5 and 6)        
         
Capital        
Sponsor      
Shareholders  12,629,903   5,724,654 
Total Capital  12,629,903   5,724,654 
         
Total liabilities and capital $13,126,530  $5,805,035 
         
Shares outstanding  600,000   350,000 
Net asset value per share $21.05  $16.36 
Market value per share $21.06  $16.35 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

88 

97

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Financial Condition

At December 31, 20172023 and 2016

United States Agriculture Index Fund

  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Assets        
Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $1,297,110 and $1,781,515, respectively)  
      (Notes 2 and 6)
 $1,297,110  $1,781,515 
Short-Term Investments (at cost $296,550 and $—, respectively) (Note 6)  296,550    
Equity in trading accounts:        
Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $159,372 and $208,306, respectively)  159,372   208,306 
Unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts  (1,125)  (89,700)
Receivable from Sponsor (Note 4)  45,533   72,173 
Interest receivable  269    
Directors' fees and insurance receivable  183    
         
Total assets $1,797,892  $1,972,294 
         
Liabilities and Capital        
Management fees payable (Note 4) $2,032  $2,129 
Professional fees payable  44,877   69,395 
Directors' fees and insurance payable     15 
         
Total liabilities  46,909   71,539 
         
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 4, 5 and 6)        
         
Capital        
Sponsor      
Shareholders  1,750,983   1,900,755 
Total Capital  1,750,983   1,900,755 
         
Total liabilities and capital $1,797,892  $1,972,294 
         
Shares outstanding  100,000   100,000 
Net asset value per share $17.51  $19.01 
Market value per share $16.51  $18.07 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

89 

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Financial Condition

At December 31, 2017 and 2016

2022

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

    

December 31, 2023

    

December 31, 2022

Assets

 

  

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $284,543,287 and $391,438,370, respectively) (Notes 2 and 6)

$

284,543,287

$

391,438,370

Equity in trading accounts:

 

  

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $14,667,216 and $19,832,917, respectively)

 

14,667,216

 

19,832,917

Unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts

 

691,254

 

13,371,583

Dividends receivable

 

417,217

 

1,383,502

Interest receivable

 

665,846

 

99,163

Prepaid professional fees

9,610

6,112

Prepaid insurance

19,285

24,931

Total Assets

$

301,013,715

$

426,156,578

 

 

Liabilities and Capital

 

 

Management fees payable (Note 4)

$

192,674

$

273,486

Professional fees payable

 

425,833

 

492,503

Brokerage commissions payable

 

3,955

 

3,955

Directors’ fees payable

 

11,343

 

12,745

 

 

Total Liabilities

 

633,805

 

782,689

 

  

 

  

Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 4, 5 and 6)

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Capital

 

  

 

  

Sponsor

 

 

Shareholders

 

300,379,910

 

425,373,889

Total Capital

 

300,379,910

 

425,373,889

 

 

Total Liabilities and Capital

$

301,013,715

$

426,156,578

 

 

Shares Outstanding

 

8,450,000

 

11,900,000

  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Assets        
Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $401,910,152 and $608,435,196, respectively)  
      (Notes 2 and 6)
 $401,910,152  $608,435,196 
Short-Term Investments (at cost $73,764,126 and $—, respectively) (Note 6)  73,764,126   —    
Equity in trading accounts:        
Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $33,566,380 and $40,511,991, respectively)  33,566,380   40,511,991 
Unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts  7,753,783   2,054,335 
Receivable for shares sold  2,104,935    
Receivable from Sponsor (Note 4)  85,686   147,813 
Interest receivable  15,004   1,261 
Directors' fees and insurance receivable  218    
ETF transaction fees receivable  700   350 
         
Total assets $519,200,984  $651,150,946 
         
Liabilities and Capital        
Payable due to Broker $442,429  $ 
Payable for shares redeemed  2,120,429   6,015,383 
Management fees payable (Note 4)  333,319   450,330 
Professional fees payable  633,210   706,759 
Brokerage commissions payable  43,305   54,015 
Directors' fees and insurance payable  5,496   6,226 
         
Total liabilities  3,578,188   7,232,713 
         
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 4, 5 and 6)        
         
Capital        
Sponsor      
Shareholders  515,622,796   643,918,233 
Total Capital  515,622,796   643,918,233 
         
Total liabilities and capital $519,200,984  $651,150,946 
         
Shares outstanding  12,500,000   16,350,000 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

90 

98

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Schedule of Investments

At December 31, 20172023

United States Commodity Index Fund

  Notional
Amount
  Number of
Contracts
  Value/
Unrealized Gain
(Loss) on Open
Commodity
Contracts
  % of
Capital
 
Open Futures Contracts - Long��               
Foreign Contracts                
LME Zinc Futures LX January 2018 contracts, expiring January 2018 $35,972,181   446  $1,213,069   0.24 
LME Aluminum Futures LA February 2018 contracts, expiring February 2018  41,453,762   840   6,148,048   1.23 
ICE Brent Crude Oil Futures CO April 2018 contracts, expiring February 2018  35,223,750   534   255,210   0.05 
LME Lead Futures LL April 2018 contracts, expiring April 2018  35,815,794   598   1,402,231   0.28 
LME Nickel Futures LN April 2018 contracts, expiring April 2018  35,062,350   495   2,888,310   0.58 
LME Tin Futures LT May 2018 contracts, expiring May 2018  36,803,605   377   902,050   0.18 
LME Lead Futures LL August 2018 contracts, expiring August 2018  35,868,369   567   (482,358)  (0.10)
LME Zinc Futures LX August 2018 contracts, expiring August 2018  35,569,000   436   279,657   0.05 
ICE-US Gas Oil Futures QS December 2018 contracts, expiring December 2018  33,607,075   612   986,225   0.20 
   325,375,886   4,905   13,592,442   2.71 
United States Contracts                
CME Live Cattle Futures LC February 2018 contracts, expiring February 2018  35,304,070   726   (5,950)  0.00*
COMEX Copper Futures HG March 2018 contracts, expiring March 2018  33,763,700   430   1,716,675   0.34 
NYMEX Natural Gas Futures NG April 2018 contracts, expiring March 2018  36,539,670   1,368   1,066,650   0.21 
CME Feeder Cattle Futures FC March 2018 contracts, expiring March 2018  35,426,138   499   171,275   0.03 
LME Aluminum Futures LA April 2018 contracts, expiring April 2018  36,208,836   643   315,455   0.06 
ICE-US Sugar #11 Futures SB May 2018 contracts, expiring April 2018  36,330,022   2,151   (145,040)  (0.03)
NYMEX Heating Oil Futures HO June 2018 contracts, expiring May 2018  31,096,531   426   4,297,423   0.86 
CBOT Wheat Futures W July 2018 contracts, expiring July 2018  38,725,288   1,573   (3,077,175)  (0.61)
COMEX Gold Futures GC August 2018 contracts, expiring August 2018  34,939,800   271   924,340   0.19 
   318,334,055   8,087   5,263,653   1.05 
Open Futures Contracts - Short**                
Foreign Contracts                
LME Zinc Futures LX January 2018 contracts, expiring January 2018  (36,749,919)  446   (438,284)  (0.09)
LME Aluminum Futures LA February 2018 contracts, expiring February 2018  (43,373,100)  840   (4,234,182)  (0.84)
LME Nickel Futures LN April 2018 contracts, expiring April 2018  (31,247,256)  495   (6,706,684)  (1.34)
LME Lead Futures LL April 2018 contracts, expiring April 2018  (36,661,056)  598   (560,927)  (0.11)
LME Tin Futures LT May 2018 contracts, expiring May 2018  (1,458,475)  15   (43,048)  (0.01)
   (149,489,806)  2,394   (11,983,125)  (2.39)
Total Open Futures Contracts*** $494,220,135   15,386  $6,872,970   1.37 

    

    

    

Fair

    

Value/Unrealized

Gain (Loss) on

Open

Number of

Commodity

% of Partners’

Notional Amount

Contracts

Contracts

Capital

Open Commodity Futures Contracts - Long

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

United States Contracts

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

NYMEX Natural Gas Futures NG March 2024 contracts, expiring February 2024

$

12,234,110

 

529

$

75,720

 

0.05

CME Live Cattle Futures LC February 2024 contracts, expiring February 2024

 

12,319,030

 

182

 

(52,230)

 

(0.03)

ICE Cocoa Futures CC March 2024 contracts, expiring March 2024

 

12,018,720

 

284

 

(102,080)

 

(0.06)

CBOT Soybean Oil Futures BO March 2024 contracts, expiring March 2024

 

13,009,224

 

417

 

(954,588)

 

(0.56)

CBOT Soybean Futures S March 2024 contracts, expiring March 2024

 

12,337,075

 

188

 

(135,875)

 

(0.08)

CBOT Soybean Meal Futures SM March 2024 contracts, expiring March 2024

 

13,045,080

 

313

 

(963,280)

 

(0.57)

ICE Coffee Futures KC March 2024 contracts, expiring March 2024

 

10,218,713

 

169

 

1,714,800

 

1.01

COMEX Copper Futures HG March 2024 contracts, expiring March 2024

 

11,597,812

 

126

 

657,263

 

0.39

NYMEX NY Harbour ULSD Futures HO April 2024 contracts, expiring March 2024

 

12,075,273

 

115

 

(236,943)

 

(0.14)

COMEX Gold 100 OZ Futures GC April 2024 contracts, expiring April 2024

 

12,386,220

 

59

 

(44,600)

 

(0.03)

ICE Sugar #11 Futures SB May 2024 contracts, expiring April 2024

 

14,783,563

 

538

 

(2,479,287)

 

(1.47)

NYMEX WTI Crude Oil Futures CL October 2024 contracts, expiring September 2024

 

12,633,382

 

169

 

(637,762)

 

(0.38)

United Kingdom Contracts

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

ICE Low Sulphur Gasoil Futures QS February 2024 contracts, expiring February 2024

 

12,014,425

 

157

 

(361,100)

 

(0.21)

ICE Brent Crude Futures CO November 2024 contracts, expiring September 2024

 

12,616,630

 

160

 

(571,830)

 

(0.34)

Foreign Contracts

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

LME Lead Futures LL January 2024 contracts, expiring January 2024*

 

13,170,786

 

246

 

(598,649)

 

(0.36)

LME Zinc Futures LX January 2024 contracts, expiring January 2024*

 

26,874,701

 

434

 

1,801,849

 

1.07

Open Commodity Futures Contracts - Short**

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Foreign Contracts

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

LME Lead Futures LL January 2024 contracts, expiring January 2024*

 

(12,667,814)

 

246

 

95,676

 

0.05

LME Zinc Futures LX January 2024 contracts, expiring January 2024*

 

(28,164,386)

 

434

 

(512,164)

 

(0.30)

Total Open Futures Contracts*

$

172,502,544

 

4,766

$

(3,305,080)

 

(1.96)

91

99

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Schedule of Investments (Continued)

At December 31, 20172023

United States Commodity Index Fund

   Principal
Amount
  Market  
Value
  % of
Capital
 
Cash Equivalents               
United States Treasury Obligations                
U.S. Treasury Bills:               
1.12%, 1/04/2018     $30,000,000  $29,997,213   5.98 
1.11%, 1/11/2018      5,000,000   4,998,465   1.00 
1.10%, 1/18/2018      10,000,000   9,994,853   1.99 
1.12%, 1/25/2018      25,000,000   24,981,417   4.98 
0.83%, 2/01/2018      10,000,000   9,992,896   1.99 
1.12%, 2/15/2018      5,000,000   4,993,063   1.00 
1.06%, 3/01/2018      12,000,000   11,979,399   2.39 
1.14%, 3/08/2018      12,000,000   11,975,085   2.39 
1.16%, 3/22/2018      10,000,000   9,974,444   1.99 
1.07%, 3/29/2018      15,000,000   14,961,672   2.99 
1.19%, 4/05/2018      4,000,000   3,987,623   0.80 
1.22%, 4/12/2018      10,000,000   9,965,913   1.99 
1.23%, 4/19/2018      15,000,000   14,945,212   2.98 
1.16%, 4/26/2018      40,000,000   39,853,135   7.95 
1.27%, 5/03/2018      20,000,000   19,914,600   3.97 
1.32%, 5/10/2018      20,000,000   19,906,117   3.97 
1.37%, 5/17/2018      10,000,000   9,948,717   1.99 
1.27%, 5/24/2018      25,000,000   24,875,074   4.96 
1.43%, 5/31/2018      20,000,000   19,881,667   3.97 
1.43%, 6/07/2018      10,000,000   9,938,072   1.98 
1.46%, 6/14/2018      10,000,000   9,934,172   1.98 
1.27%, 6/21/2018      20,000,000   19,880,181   3.97 
1.50%, 6/28/2018      25,000,000   24,815,819   4.95 
Total Treasury Obligations          361,694,809   72.16 
                 
United States - Money Market Funds                
Fidelity Investments Money Market Funds - Government Portfolio      3,000,000   3,000,000   0.60 
Goldman Sachs Financial Square Funds - Government Fund - Class FS      3,000,000   3,000,000   0.60 
Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds - Government Portfolio      3,000,000   3,000,000   0.60 
Total Money Market Funds          9,000,000   1.80 
Total Cash Equivalents         $370,694,809   73.96 

    

Shares/Principal

    

    

% of Partners’

Amount

Market Value

Capital

Cash Equivalents

 

  

 

  

 

  

United States Treasury Obligations

 

  

 

  

 

  

U.S. Treasury Bills:

 

  

 

  

 

  

5.40%, 1/02/2024

$

7,000,000

$

6,998,968

 

4.14

5.43%, 1/23/2024

 

8,000,000

 

7,973,927

 

4.72

5.39%, 2/08/2024

 

4,000,000

 

3,977,770

 

2.36

5.30%, 2/15/2024

 

5,000,000

 

4,967,219

 

2.94

5.30%, 2/29/2024

 

5,000,000

 

4,957,061

 

2.93

5.23%, 3/12/2024

 

4,000,000

 

3,958,426

 

2.34

5.21%, 3/26/2024

 

7,000,000

 

6,913,147

 

4.09

5.28%, 3/28/2024

 

3,000,000

 

2,962,118

 

1.75

Total United States Treasury Obligations

 

 

42,708,636

 

25.27

United States Money Market Funds

 

  

 

  

 

  

Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Money Market Fund - Institutional Shares, 5.32%#

 

55,800,000

 

55,800,000

 

33.01

Total United States Money Market Funds

 

  

 

55,800,000

 

33.01

Total Cash Equivalents

 

  

$

98,508,636

 

58.28

#Reflects the 7-day yield at December 31, 2023.

*Collateral amounted to $13,041,505 on open commodity futures contracts.

Short-Term Investments                
United States Treasury Obligations                
1.35%, 7/19/2018     $15,000,000  $14,889,527   2.97 
1.21%, 8/16/2018      16,000,000   15,879,280   3.17 
1.32%, 9/13/2018      12,000,000   11,889,358   2.37 
1.40%, 10/11/2018      15,000,000   14,837,491   2.96 
1.54%, 11/08/2018      6,000,000   5,921,213   1.18 
1.69%, 12/06/2018      8,000,000   7,874,900   1.57 
Total Treasury Obligations          71,291,769   14.22 
Total Short-Term Investments       $71,291,769   14.22 

* Represents less than 0.005%.

**All short contracts are offset by the same number oflong positions in Commodity Futures Contracts in the corresponding long positions and are acquired solely for the purpose of reducing a long position (e.g., due to a redemption or to reflect a rebalancing of the SDCI).

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

100

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Schedule of Investments

At December 31, 2022

United States Commodity Index Fund

Fair 

 

Value/Unrealized 

 

Gain (Loss) on 

 

Open 

 

Number of

Commodity

% of Partners’

 

    

Notional Amount

    

Contracts

    

 Contracts

    

 Capital

 

Open Commodity Futures Contracts - Long

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

United States Contracts

 

NYMEX Natural Gas Futures NG March 2023 contracts, expiring February 2023

$

17,320,648

 

410

$

(494,248)

 

(0.19)

ICE Cotton Futures CT March 2023 contracts, expiring March 2023

 

16,096,743

 

437

 

2,119,602

 

0.83

CBOT Soybean Oil Futures BO March 2023 contracts, expiring March 2023

 

19,398,240

 

462

 

(1,638,036)

 

(0.64)

CBOT Soybean Meal Futures SM March 2023 contracts, expiring March 2023

 

16,928,530

 

411

 

2,429,570

 

0.95

ICE Cocoa Futures CC March 2023 contracts, expiring March 2023

 

18,202,920

 

698

 

(54,920)

 

(0.02)

ICE Coffee Futures KC March 2023 contracts, expiring March 2023

 

18,688,763

 

294

 

(243,938)

 

(0.10)

COMEX Copper Futures HG March 2023 contracts, expiring March 2023

 

16,504,500

 

191

 

1,690,638

 

0.66

NYMEX Platinum Futures PL April 2023 contracts, expiring April 2023

 

18,068,140

 

356

 

1,207,480

 

0.47

NYMEX NY Harbour ULSD Futures HO May 2023 contracts, expiring April 2023

 

18,013,969

 

145

 

136,058

 

0.05

ICE Sugar #11 Futures SB May 2023 contracts, expiring April 2023

 

16,524,715

 

864

 

1,590,254

 

0.62

CBOT Corn Futures C May 2023 contracts, expiring May 2023

 

18,507,338

 

546

 

2,062

 

0.00

United Kingdom Contracts

 

 

ICE Low Sulphur Gasoil Futures QS April 2023 contracts, expiring April 2023

 

17,671,800

 

206

(58,800)

(0.02)

Foreign Contracts

 

 

LME Tin Futures LT January 2023 contracts, expiring January 2023*

19,951,610

 

175

1,738,984

0.68

LME Lead Futures LL February 2023 contracts, expiring February 2023*

 

18,166,713

 

320

341,288

0.13

LME Zinc Futures LX February 2023 contracts, expiring February 2023*

 

21,522,369

 

297

628,263

0.25

Open Commodity Futures Contracts - Short**

Foreign Contracts

 

 

LME Tin Futures LT January 2023 contracts, expiring January 2023*

 

(21,600,331)

 

175

(90,263)

(0.04)

LME Zinc Futures LX February 2023 contracts, expiring February 2023*

 

(3,823,800)

 

50

94,737

0.04

Total Open Futures Contracts*

$

246,142,867

 

6,037

$

9,398,730

3.67

    

Shares/Principal

    

    

% of Partners’

Amount

Market Value

Capital

Cash Equivalents

United States Money Market Funds

Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Money Market Fund - Institutional Shares, 4.27%#

 

233,050,000

$

233,050,000

 

91.09

Total United States Money Market Funds

 

  

$

233,050,000

 

91.09

Represents less than 0.005%.

#

Reflects the 7-day yield at December 31, 2022.

*

Collateral amounted to $12,926,388 on open commodity futures contracts.

**

All short contracts are offset by long positions in Commodity Futures Contracts and are acquired solely for the purpose of reducing a long position (e.g., due to a redemption or to reflect a rebalancing of the SDCI).

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

101

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Schedule of Investments

At December 31, 2023

United States Copper Index Fund

    

    

    

Fair

    

Value/Unrealized

Gain (Loss) on

Open

Number of

Commodity

% of Partners’

Notional Amount

Contracts

Contracts

Capital

Open Commodity Futures Contracts - Long

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

United States Contracts

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

COMEX Copper Futures HG March 2024 contracts, expiring March 2024

$

42,284,764

 

450

$

1,483,361

 

1.13

COMEX Copper Futures HG May 2024 contracts, expiring May 2024

 

42,189,925

 

446

 

1,389,850

 

1.06

COMEX Copper Futures HG July 2024 contracts, expiring July 2024

 

42,662,927

 

446

 

1,123,123

 

0.85

Total Open Futures Contracts*

$

127,137,616

 

1,342

$

3,996,334

 

3.04

    

Shares/Principal

    

    

% of Partners’

Amount

Market Value

Capital

Cash Equivalents

 

  

 

  

 

  

United States Treasury Obligations

 

  

 

  

 

  

U.S. Treasury Bills:

 

  

 

  

 

  

5.39%, 2/08/2024

$

4,000,000

$

3,977,770

 

3.03

5.30%, 2/15/2024

 

4,000,000

 

3,973,775

 

3.03

5.30%, 2/29/2024

 

5,000,000

 

4,957,061

 

3.77

5.21%, 3/26/2024

 

5,000,000

 

4,937,962

 

3.76

5.28%, 3/28/2024

 

3,000,000

 

2,962,119

 

2.25

Total United States Treasury Obligations

 

  

 

20,808,687

 

15.84

United States Money Market Funds

 

  

 

  

 

  

Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Money Market Fund - Institutional Shares, 5.32%#

 

32,950,000

 

32,950,000

 

25.09

Total United States Money Market Funds

 

  

 

32,950,000

 

25.09

Total Cash Equivalents

 

  

$

53,758,687

 

40.93

#Reflects the 7-day yield at December 31, 2023.

*** Collateral amounted to $32,608,929$1,625,711 on open commodity futures contracts.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

92

102

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Schedule of Investments

At December 31, 20162022

United States Copper Index Fund

    

    

    

Fair 

    

Value/Unrealized

Gain (Loss) on

Number of

Open Commodity

% of Partners’

Notional Amount

Contracts

Contracts

Capital

Open Commodity Futures Contracts - Long

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

United States Contracts

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

COMEX Copper Futures HG March 2023 contracts, expiring March 2023

$

109,593,997

 

1,187

$

3,482,590

 

2.05

COMEX Copper Futures HG May 2023 contracts, expiring May 2023

 

55,964,338

 

592

 

490,263

 

0.29

Total Open Futures Contracts*

$

165,558,335

 

1,779

$

3,972,853

 

2.34

    

Shares/Principal

    

    

% of Partners’

Amount

Market Value

Capital

Cash Equivalents

 

  

 

  

 

  

United States Money Market Funds

 

  

 

  

 

  

Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Government Money Market Fund - Institutional Shares, 4.27%#

 

158,200,000

$

158,200,000

 

93.31

Total United States Money Market Funds

 

  

$

158,200,000

 

93.31

#

Reflects the 7-day yield at December 31, 2022.

*

Collateral amounted to $6,906,529 on open commodity futures contracts.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

103

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021

United States Commodity Index Fund

  Notional
Amount
  Number of
Contracts
  Value/
Unrealized Gain
(Loss) on Open
Commodity
Contracts
  % of  
Capital
 
Open Futures Contracts - Long                
Foreign Contracts                
LME Aluminum Futures LA January 2017 contracts, expiring January 2017 $48,011,306   1,106  $(1,172,206)  (0.19)
LME Tin Futures LT January 2017 contracts, expiring January 2017  52,192,055   611   12,573,896   1.98 
LME Aluminum Futures LA February 2017 contracts, expiring February 2017  45,164,525   1,067   (80,638)  (0.01)
LME Tin Futures LT February 2017 contracts, expiring February 2017  45,664,580   434   305,433   0.05 
ICE-US Cocoa Futures CC March 2017 contracts, expiring March 2017  54,942,630   2,030   (11,784,830)  (1.85)
LME Zinc Futures LX April 2017 contracts, expiring April 2017  51,449,744   883   5,474,631   0.86 
ICE-US Sugar #11 Futures SB May 2017 contracts, expiring April 2017  50,163,781   2,216   (2,386,821)  (0.38)
LME Lead Futures LL May 2017 contracts, expiring May 2017  50,146,225   978   (769,450)  (0.12)
LME Nickel Futures LN July 2017 contracts, expiring July 2017  47,868,434   695   (5,868,193)  (0.92)
ICE Brent Crude Oil Futures CO December 2017 contracts, expiring October 2017  45,543,090   777   90,120   0.01 
ICE-US Gas Oil Futures QS December 2017 contracts, expiring December 2017  45,455,550   869   (6,850)  0.00*
   536,601,920   11,666   (3,624,908)  (0.57)
United States Contracts                
CBOT Soybean Oil Futures BO March 2017 contracts, expiring March 2017  42,867,888   2,138   1,593,960   0.25 
COMEX Copper Futures HG March 2017 contracts, expiring March 2017  47,789,237   722   (2,564,963)  (0.40)
CME Feeder Cattle Futures FC March 2017 contracts, expiring March 2017  44,529,438   721   569,113   0.09 
COMEX Gold Futures GC April 2017 contracts, expiring April 2017  45,813,580   398   127,560   0.02 
NYMEX Natural Gas Futures NG October 2017 contracts, expiring September 2017  40,270,450   1,283   5,532,650   0.87 
NYMEX WTI Crude Oil Futures CL December 2017 contracts, expiring November 2017  45,500,740   798   33,140   0.00*
NYMEX Heating Oil Futures HO December 2017 contracts, expiring November 2017  45,531,528   605   130,242   0.02 
   312,302,861   6,665   5,421,702   0.85 
Open Futures Contracts - Short**                
Foreign Contracts                
LME Aluminum Futures LA January 2017 contracts, expiring January 2017  (46,912,056)  1,106   65,634   0.01 
LME Tin Futures LT January 2017 contracts, expiring January 2017  (62,903,883)  611   (1,864,792)  (0.29)
LME Zinc Futures LX April 2017 contracts, expiring April 2017  (12,025,981)  180   421,463   0.07 
LME Lead Futures LL May 2017 contracts, expiring May 2017  (50,664,331)  978   1,281,082   0.20 
LME Nickel Futures LN July 2017 contracts, expiring July 2017  (42,360,120)  695   355,279   0.05 
   (214,866,371)  3,570   258,666   0.04 
Total Open Futures Contracts*** $634,038,420   21,901  $2,055,460   0.32 

Year ended

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

    

December 31, 2023

December 31, 2022

December 31, 2021

Income

  

 

  

 

  

Gain (loss) on trading of commodity futures contracts:

  

 

  

 

  

Realized gain (loss) on closed commodity futures contracts

$

2,123,019

$

59,921,738

$

58,239,578

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts

 

(12,703,810)

 

4,552,856

 

(2,447,470)

Dividend income

 

5,301,761

 

4,009,510

 

47,548

Interest income

 

4,353,406

 

474,723

 

2,186

ETF transaction fees

 

10,850

 

15,750

 

12,950

Total Income (Loss)

$

(914,774)

$

68,974,577

$

55,854,792

 

 

 

Expenses

 

 

 

Management fees (Note 4)

$

1,567,809

$

2,436,671

$

1,681,043

Professional fees

 

369,911

 

553,920

 

212,800

Brokerage commissions

 

160,196

 

208,672

 

151,236

Directors’ fees and insurance

 

81,283

 

71,043

 

45,061

Other fees

6,375

Registration fees

 

 

6,617

 

32,976

Total Expenses

$

2,179,199

$

3,283,298

$

2,123,116

Net Income (Loss)

$

(3,093,973)

$

65,691,279

$

53,731,676

Net Income (Loss) per share

$

0.11

#

$

12.80

$

10.85

Net Income (Loss) per weighted average share

$

(0.89)

$

11.75

$

10.12

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

3,490,411

 

5,589,726

 

5,311,644

#

93

The amount shown for a share outstanding throughout the year may not agree with the change in the aggregate gains and losses for the year because of the timing of sales and repurchases of the Fund’s shares in relation to fluctuating market values for the Fund.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

104

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust
Schedule

Statements of Investments (Continued)
AtOperations

For the years ended December 31, 20162023, 2022 and 2021

United States Copper Index Fund

Year ended

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

    

December 31, 2023

December 31, 2022

December 31, 2021

Income

  

 

  

 

  

Gain (loss) on trading of commodity futures contracts:

  

 

  

 

  

Realized gain (loss) on closed commodity futures contracts

$

1,358,100

$

(32,719,288)

$

20,590,837

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts

 

23,481

 

(3,280,075)

 

2,956,865

Dividend income

 

3,535,741

 

2,337,669

 

55,984

Interest income

 

3,449,738

 

222,228

 

2,309

ETF transaction fees

 

17,500

 

17,500

 

36,750

Total Income (Loss)

$

8,384,560

$

(33,421,966)

$

23,642,745

 

 

 

Expenses

 

 

 

Management fees (Note 4)

$

921,146

$

1,248,527

$

1,565,147

Professional fees

 

431,530

 

444,451

 

308,342

Brokerage commissions

 

38,792

 

55,612

 

65,088

Directors’ fees and insurance

 

76,810

 

80,390

 

53,747

Other fees

6,375

Registration fees

24,092

117,738

Total Expenses

$

1,468,278

$

1,859,447

$

2,110,062

Expense waiver (Note 4)

 

 

 

(63,274)

Net Expenses

$

1,468,278

$

1,859,447

$

2,046,788

Net Income (Loss)

$

6,916,282

$

(35,281,413)

$

21,595,957

Net Income (Loss) per share

$

1.03

$

(4.17)

$

5.52

Net Income (Loss) per weighted average share

$

1.16

$

(4.51)

$

2.36

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

5,955,616

 

7,829,863

 

9,143,699

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

105

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

December 31, 2023

December 31, 2022

December 31, 2021

Income

 

  

 

  

 

  

Gain (loss) on trading of commodity futures contracts:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Realized gain (loss) on closed commodity futures contracts

$

3,481,119

$

27,202,450

$

78,830,415

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts

 

(12,680,329)

 

1,272,781

 

509,395

Dividend income

 

8,837,502

 

6,347,179

 

103,532

Interest income

 

7,803,144

 

696,951

 

4,495

ETF transaction fees

 

28,350

 

33,250

 

49,700

Total Income (Loss)

$

7,469,786

$

35,552,611

$

79,497,537

 

 

 

Expenses

 

 

 

Management fees (Note 4)

$

2,488,955

$

3,685,198

$

3,246,190

Professional fees

 

801,441

 

998,371

 

521,142

Brokerage commissions

 

198,988

 

264,284

 

216,324

Directors’ fees and insurance

 

158,093

 

151,433

 

98,808

Other fees

12,750

Registration fees

30,709

150,714

Total Expenses

$

3,647,477

$

5,142,745

$

4,233,178

Expense waiver (Note 4)

 

 

 

(63,274)

Net Expenses

$

3,647,477

$

5,142,745

$

4,169,904

Net Income (Loss)

$

3,822,309

$

30,409,866

$

75,327,633

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

106

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Changes in Capital

For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021

United States Commodity Index Fund

Shareholders*

Year ended

Year ended

Year ended

December 31, 

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

    

2021

Balances at beginning of year

$

255,837,514

$

234,520,505

$

110,783,068

Addition of 450,000, 2,150,000 and 3,300,000 shares, respectively

 

25,739,124

 

117,728,095

 

121,879,808

Redemption of (2,000,000), (3,000,000) and (1,300,000) shares, respectively

(109,456,097)

(162,102,365)

(51,874,047)

Net income (loss)

 

(3,093,973)

 

65,691,279

 

53,731,676

Balances at end of year

$

169,026,568

$

255,837,514

$

234,520,505

*

Sponsors’ shares outstanding and capital for the periods presented were zero.

   Principal
Amount
  Market  
Value
  % of
Capital
 
Cash Equivalents               
United States Treasury Obligations                
U.S. Treasury Bills:               
0.34%, 1/05/2017     $40,000,000  $39,998,489   6.29 
0.38%, 1/12/2017      30,000,000   29,996,517   4.72 
0.43%, 1/19/2017      20,000,000   19,995,750   3.14 
0.36%, 1/26/2017      20,000,000   19,995,000   3.14 
0.45%, 2/16/2017      20,000,000   19,988,500   3.14 
0.45%, 3/02/2017      20,000,000   19,985,000   3.14 
0.47%, 3/09/2017      20,000,000   19,982,505   3.14 
0.43%, 3/30/2017      20,000,000   19,978,978   3.14 
0.47%, 4/13/2017      20,000,000   19,973,367   3.14 
0.46%, 4/20/2017      20,000,000   19,972,447   3.14 
0.47%, 4/27/2017      35,000,000   34,947,558   5.49 
0.49%, 5/04/2017      35,000,000   34,941,105   5.49 
0.55%, 5/11/2017      25,000,000   24,950,799   3.92 
0.60%, 5/18/2017      30,000,000   29,932,071   4.70 
0.61%, 5/25/2017      30,000,000   29,927,100   4.70 
0.60%, 6/01/2017      10,000,000   9,975,043   1.57 
0.62%, 6/08/2017      40,000,000   39,892,033   6.27 
0.65%, 6/15/2017      40,000,000   39,881,750   6.27 
0.64%, 6/22/2017      30,000,000   29,908,266   4.70 
0.60%, 6/29/2017      10,000,000   9,970,167   1.57 
Total Cash Equivalents         $514,192,445   80.81 

* Represents less than 0.005%.

** All short contracts are offset by the same number of Futures Contracts in the corresponding long positions and are acquired solely for the purpose of reducing a long position (e.g., due to a redemption or to reflect a rebalancing of the SDCI).

*** Collateral amounted to $40,050,520 on open futures contracts.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

94

107

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust
Schedule

Statements of Investments
AtChanges in Capital

For the years ended December 31, 2017

2023, 2022 and 2021

United States Copper Index Fund

Shareholders*

Year ended

Year ended

Year ended

December 31, 

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

    

2021

Balances at beginning of year

$

169,536,375

$

228,783,408

$

65,163,704

Addition of 2,800,000, 4,350,000 and 14,150,000 shares, respectively

 

68,182,109

 

107,138,968

 

372,651,530

Redemption of (4,700,000), (5,400,000) and (8,750,000) shares, respectively

(113,281,424)

(131,104,588)

(230,627,783)

Net income (loss)

 

6,916,282

 

(35,281,413)

 

21,595,957

Balances at end of year

$

131,353,342

$

169,536,375

$

228,783,408

*

Sponsors’ shares outstanding and capital for the periods presented were zero.

  Notional
Amount
  Number of
Contracts
  Value/
Unrealized Gain
(Loss) on Open
Commodity
Contracts
  % of  
Capital
 
Open Futures Contracts - Long                
United States Contracts                
COMEX Copper Futures HG May 2018 contracts, expiring May 2018* $11,797,938   153  $881,938   6.98 

   Principal
Amount
  Market  
Value
   
Cash Equivalents                
United States Treasury Obligations                
U.S. Treasury Bills:               
0.92%, 1/04/2018     $250,000  $249,981   1.98 
1.12%, 1/25/2018      100,000   99,926   0.79 
0.82%, 2/01/2018      200,000   199,860   1.58 
1.13%, 2/08/2018      100,000   99,881   0.79 
1.12%, 2/15/2018      250,000   249,653��  1.98 
1.02%, 3/01/2018      500,000   499,174   3.95 
1.14%, 3/15/2018      300,000   299,313   2.37 
1.16%, 3/22/2018      500,000   498,722   3.95 
1.02%, 3/29/2018      250,000   249,390   1.98 
1.19%, 4/05/2018      200,000   199,381   1.58 
1.22%, 4/12/2018      200,000   199,318   1.58 
1.23%, 4/19/2018      300,000   298,904   2.37 
1.15%, 4/26/2018      400,000   398,540   3.16 
1.27%, 5/03/2018      100,000   99,573   0.79 
1.37%, 5/17/2018      500,000   497,436   3.94 
1.28%, 5/24/2018      300,000   298,485   2.36 
1.43%, 5/31/2018      300,000   298,225   2.36 
1.43%, 6/07/2018      300,000   298,142   2.36 
1.46%, 6/14/2018      500,000   496,709   3.93 
1.42%, 6/21/2018      400,000   397,331   3.15 
1.50%, 6/28/2018      500,000   496,316   3.93 
Total Treasury Obligations          6,424,260   50.88 
                 
United States - Money Market Funds                
Fidelity Investments Money Market Funds - Government Portfolio      330,000   330,000   2.61 
Goldman Sachs Financial Square Funds - Government Fund - Class FS      330,000   330,000   2.61 
Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds - Government Portfolio      330,000   330,000   2.61 
Total Money Market Funds          990,000   7.83 
Total Cash Equivalents         $7,414,260   58.71 

Short-Term Investments                
United States Treasury Obligations                
1.36%, 7/19/2018     $400,000  $397,016   3.14 
1.44%, 8/16/2018      400,000   396,419   3.14 
1.32%, 9/13/2018      300,000   297,230   2.35 
1.39%, 10/11/2018      300,000   296,771   2.35 
1.58%, 11/08/2018      400,000   394,614   3.12 
1.68%, 12/06/2018      400,000   393,757   3.12 
Total Treasury Obligations          2,175,807   17.22 
Total Short-Term Investments       $2,175,807   17.22 

* Collateral amounted to $798,079 on open futures contracts.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

95

108

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust
Schedule

Statements of Investments
AtChanges in Capital

For the years ended December 31, 20162023, 2022 and 2021

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Shareholders*

Year ended

Year ended

Year ended

December 31, 

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

    

2021

Balances at beginning of year

$

425,373,889

$

463,303,913

$

175,946,772

Addition of 3,250,000, 6,500,000 and 17,450,000 shares

 

93,921,233

 

224,867,063

494,531,338

Redemption of (6,700,000), (8,400,000) and (10,050,000) shares

 

(222,737,521)

 

(293,206,953)

���

(282,501,830)

Net income (loss)

 

3,822,309

 

30,409,866

75,327,633

 

 

  

Balances at end of year

$

300,379,910

$

425,373,889

$

463,303,913

*

Sponsors’ shares outstanding and capital for the periods presented were zero.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

109

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021

United States Commodity Index Fund

Year ended

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

December 31, 

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2023

2022

2021

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Net income (loss)

$

(3,093,973)

$

65,691,279

$

53,731,676

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

Change in unrealized (gain) loss on open commodity futures contracts

12,703,810

(4,552,856)

2,447,470

(Increase) decrease in dividends receivable

 

565,165

 

(829,327)

 

(2,243)

(Increase) decrease in interest receivable

 

(269,342)

 

(64,015)

 

(44)

(Increase) decrease in prepaid insurance

 

(2,878)

 

(4,612)

 

(2,062)

(Increase) decrease in prepaid registration fees

6,616

(6,616)

Increase (decrease) in Management fees payable

 

(57,216)

 

20,879

 

84,889

Increase (decrease) in professional fees payable

 

(75,253)

 

146,824

 

(119,157)

Increase (decrease) in directors’ fees payable

 

(1,402)

 

1,215

 

2,956

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

9,768,911

 

60,416,003

 

56,136,869

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

 

 

Addition of shares

 

25,739,124

 

117,728,095

 

121,879,808

Redemption of shares

 

(109,456,097)

 

(162,102,365)

 

(51,874,047)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

(83,716,973)

 

(44,374,270)

 

70,005,761

 

 

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

(73,948,062)

 

16,041,733

 

126,142,630

 

 

 

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Equity in Trading Accounts, beginning of year

 

246,057,371

 

230,015,638

 

103,873,008

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Equity in Trading Accounts, end of year

$

172,109,309

$

246,057,371

$

230,015,638

 

 

 

Components of Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Equity in Trading Account:

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

159,067,804

$

233,130,983

$

217,583,826

Equity in Trading Accounts:

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

13,041,505

 

12,926,388

 

12,431,812

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Equity in Trading Accounts

$

172,109,309

$

246,057,371

$

230,015,638

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

110

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021

United States Copper Index Fund

Year ended

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

December 31, 

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2023

2022

2021

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Net income (loss)

$

6,916,282

$

(35,281,413)

$

21,595,957

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

Change in unrealized (gain) loss on open commodity futures contracts

 

(23,481)

 

3,280,075

 

(2,956,865)

(Increase) decrease in receivable from Sponsor

 

 

 

58,202

(Increase) decrease in dividends receivable

 

401,120

 

(544,714)

 

(3,524)

(Increase) decrease in interest receivable

 

(297,341)

 

(35,033)

 

(65)

(Increase) decrease in prepaid professional fees

(3,498)

(6,112)

(Increase) decrease in prepaid insurance

 

8,524

 

(5,629)

 

(7,188)

(Increase) decrease in prepaid registration fees

 

 

24,092

 

(24,092)

Increase (decrease) in payable due to Broker

 

 

 

(1,428,240)

Increase (decrease) in Management fees payable

 

(23,596)

 

(38,525)

 

102,193

Increase (decrease) in professional fees payable

 

8,583

 

(48,932)

 

140,063

Increase (decrease) in directors’ fees payable

186

1,788

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

6,986,593

 

(32,656,005)

 

17,478,229

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

 

 

Addition of shares

 

68,182,109

 

107,138,968

 

372,651,530

Redemption of shares

 

(113,281,424)

 

(131,104,588)

 

(230,627,783)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

(45,099,315)

 

(23,965,620)

 

142,023,747

 

 

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

(38,112,722)

 

(56,621,625)

 

159,501,976

 

 

 

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Equity in Trading Accounts, beginning of year

 

165,213,916

 

221,835,541

 

62,333,565

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Equity in Trading Accounts, end of year

$

127,101,194

$

165,213,916

$

221,835,541

 

 

 

Components of Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Equity in Trading Account:

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

125,475,483

$

158,307,387

$

213,185,032

Equity in Trading Accounts:

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

1,625,711

 

6,906,529

 

8,650,509

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Equity in Trading Accounts

$

127,101,194

$

165,213,916

$

221,835,541

  Notional
Amount
  Number of
Contracts
  Value/  
Unrealized Gain
(Loss) on Open
Commodity
Contracts
  % of  
Capital
 
Open Futures Contracts - Long   
United States Contracts                
COMEX Copper Futures HG March 2017 contracts, expiring March 2017 $2,604,987   46  $276,338   4.83 
COMEX Copper Futures HG May 2017 contracts, expiring May 2017  3,076,563   46   (187,763)  (3.28)
Total Open Futures Contracts* $5,681,550   92  $88,575   1.55 

   Principal
Amount
  Market  
Value
   
Cash Equivalents                
United States Treasury Obligations                
U.S. Treasury Bills:                
0.34%, 1/05/2017    $250,000  $249,990   4.37 
0.44%, 1/26/2017      150,000   149,955   2.62 
0.46%, 2/16/2017      150,000   149,913   2.62 
0.48%, 3/09/2017      150,000   149,866   2.62 
0.46%, 4/06/2017      250,000   249,700   4.36 
0.47%, 4/13/2017      250,000   249,667   4.36 
0.46%, 4/20/2017      250,000   249,656   4.36 
0.47%, 4/27/2017      400,000   399,401   6.98 
0.49%, 5/04/2017      350,000   349,411   6.10 
0.55%, 5/11/2017      300,000   299,410   5.23 
0.60%, 5/18/2017      350,000   349,207   6.10 
0.60%, 6/01/2017      200,000   199,501   3.48 
0.62%, 6/08/2017      500,000   498,650   8.71 
0.65%, 6/15/2017      500,000   498,522   8.71 
0.64%, 6/22/2017      500,000   498,471   8.71 
Total Cash Equivalents         $4,541,320   79.33 

* Collateral amountedSee accompanying notes to $253,165 on open futures contracts.financial statements.

111

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Year ended

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

    

2023

2022

2021

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Net income (loss)

$

3,822,309

$

30,409,866

$

75,327,633

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Change in unrealized (gain) loss on open commodity futures contracts

 

12,680,329

 

(1,272,781)

 

(509,395)

(Increase) decrease in receivable from Sponsor

 

 

 

58,202

(Increase) decrease in dividends receivable

 

966,285

 

(1,374,041)

 

(5,767)

(Increase) decrease in interest receivable

 

(566,683)

 

(99,048)

 

(109)

(Increase) decrease in prepaid professional fees

(3,498)

(6,112)

(Increase) decrease in prepaid insurance

 

5,646

 

(10,241)

 

(9,250)

(Increase) decrease in prepaid registration fees

30,708

(30,708)

Increase (decrease) in payable due to Broker

 

 

 

(1,428,240)

Increase (decrease) in Management fees payable

 

(80,812)

 

(17,646)

 

187,082

Increase (decrease) in professional fees payable

 

(66,670)

 

97,892

 

20,906

Increase (decrease) in directors’ fees payable

 

(1,402)

 

1,401

 

4,744

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

16,755,504

 

27,759,998

 

73,615,098

 

 

 

  

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Addition of shares

 

93,921,233

 

224,867,063

 

494,531,338

Redemption of shares

 

(222,737,521)

 

(293,206,953)

 

(282,501,830)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

(128,816,288)

 

(68,339,890)

 

212,029,508

 

 

  

 

  

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

(112,060,784)

 

(40,579,892)

 

285,644,606

 

 

  

 

  

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Equity in Trading Accounts, beginning of year

 

411,271,287

 

451,851,179

 

166,206,573

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Equity in Trading Accounts, end of year

$

299,210,503

$

411,271,287

$

451,851,179

 

  

 

  

 

  

Components of Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Equity in Trading Account:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents

$

284,543,287

$

391,438,370

$

430,768,858

Equity in Trading Accounts:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents

 

14,667,216

 

19,832,917

 

21,082,321

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Equity in Trading Accounts

$

299,210,503

$

411,271,287

$

451,851,179

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

96

112

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust
ScheduleTable of Investments
At December 31, 2017
Contents

United States Agriculture Index Fund

  Notional
Amount
  Number of
Contracts
  Value/
Unrealized Gain
(Loss) on Open
Commodity
Contracts
  % of  
Capital
 
Open Futures Contracts - Long                
Foreign Contracts                
ICE-Canola Futures RS March 2018 contracts, expiring March 2018 $87,058   11  $(1,314)  (0.07)
                 
United States Contracts                
CME Live Cattle Futures LC February 2018 contracts, expiring February 2018  192,810   4   1,670   0.10 
ICE-US Cotton #2 Futures CT March 2018 contracts, expiring March 2018  136,540   4   20,720   1.18 
CBOT Wheat Futures W March 2018 contracts, expiring March 2018  182,513   8   (11,713)  (0.67)
ICE-US Cocoa Futures CC March 2018 contracts, expiring March 2018  80,070   4   (4,390)  (0.25)
KCBT Hard Red Winter Wheat Futures KW March 2018 contracts, expiring March 2018  43,112   2   (387)  (0.02)
CME Feeder Cattle Futures FC March 2018 contracts, expiring March 2018  71,125   1   213   0.01 
CME Lean Hogs Futures LH April 2018 contracts, expiring April 2018  149,360   5   1,940   0.11 
ICE-US Sugar #11 Futures SB May 2018 contracts, expiring April 2018  198,005   12   3,864   0.22 
CBOT Soybean Meal Futures SM July 2018 contracts, expiring July 2018  67,160   2   (2,460)  (0.14)
CBOT Soybean Oil Futures BO July 2018 contracts, expiring July 2018  21,252   1   (1,080)  (0.06)
ICE-US Coffee-C Futures KC July 2018 contracts, expiring July 2018  149,756   3   (2,438)  (0.14)
CBOT Soybean Futures S November 2018 contracts, expiring November 2018  196,988   4   (1,838)  (0.11)
CBOT Corn Futures C December 2018 contracts, expiring December 2018  176,712   9   (3,912)  (0.22)
   1,665,403   59   189   0.01 
Total Open Futures Contracts* $1,752,461   70  $(1,125)  (0.06)

97

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust
Schedule of Investments (Continued)
At December 31, 2017

United States Agriculture Index Fund

   Principal
Amount
  Market  
Value
  % of
Capital
 
Cash Equivalents   
United States Treasury Obligations                
U.S. Treasury Bills:               
1.12%, 1/04/2018     $100,000  $99,991   5.71 
1.11%, 1/11/2018      100,000   99,969   5.71 
1.12%, 2/01/2018      100,000   99,904   5.71 
1.12%, 2/15/2018      250,000   249,653   14.26 
1.14%, 3/08/2018      50,000   49,896   2.85 
1.16%, 3/22/2018      50,000   49,872   2.85 
1.19%, 4/05/2018      100,000   99,691   5.69 
1.27%, 5/03/2018      50,000   49,786   2.84 
1.37%, 5/17/2018      50,000   49,744   2.84 
1.43%, 5/24/2018      50,000   49,719   2.84 
1.43%, 5/31/2018      50,000   49,704   2.84 
1.49%, 6/21/2018      50,000   49,648   2.84 
1.50%, 6/28/2018      50,000   49,632   2.83 
Total Treasury Obligations          1,047,209   59.81 

United States - Money Market Funds   
Fidelity Investments Money Market Funds - Government Portfolio     100,000   100,000   5.71 
Goldman Sachs Financial Square Funds - Government Fund - Class FS      100,000   100,000   5.71 
Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds - Government Portfolio      100,000   100,000   5.71 
Total Money Market Funds          300,000   17.13 
Total Cash Equivalents         $1,347,209   76.94 

Short-Term Investments                
United States Treasury Obligations                
1.33%, 7/19/2018     $50,000  $49,635   2.83 
1.44%, 8/16/2018      50,000   49,551   2.83 
1.51%, 9/13/2018      50,000   49,471   2.83 
1.67%, 10/11/2018      50,000   49,353   2.82 
1.58%, 11/08/2018      50,000   49,326   2.82 
1.70%, 12/06/2018      50,000   49,214   2.81 
Total Treasury Obligations          296,550   16.94 
Total Short-Term Investments       $296,550   16.94

* Collateral amounted to $159,372 on open futures contracts.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

98

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust
Schedule of Investments
At December 31, 2016

United States Agriculture Index Fund

  Notional
Amount
  Number of
Contracts
  Value/  
Unrealized Gain
(Loss) on Open
Commodity
Contracts
  % of  
Capital
 
Open Futures Contracts - Long                
Foreign Contracts                
ICE-US Cotton #2 Futures CT March 2017 contracts, expiring March 2017 $140,385   4  $915   0.05 
ICE-Canola Futures RS March 2017 contracts, expiring March 2017  22,444   3   63   0.00*
ICE-US Cocoa Futures CC March 2017 contracts, expiring March 2017  182,800   7   (33,980)  (1.79)
ICE-US Sugar #11 Futures SB May 2017 contracts, expiring April 2017  251,250   11   (14,090)  (0.74)
ICE-US Coffee-C Futures KC July 2017 contracts, expiring July 2017  255,900   4   (43,350)  (2.28)
   852,779   29   (90,442)  (4.76)
United States Contracts                
CBOT Soybean Oil Futures BO March 2017 contracts, expiring March 2017  79,884   4   3,300   0.17 
CBOT Wheat Futures W March 2017 contracts, expiring March 2017  134,387   6   (11,988)  (0.63)
CME Feeder Cattle Futures FC March 2017 contracts, expiring March 2017  124,063   2   1,038   0.06 
CME Lean Hogs Futures LH April 2017 contracts, expiring April 2017  74,900   3   6,790   0.36 
CME Live Cattle Futures LC April 2017 contracts, expiring April 2017  132,980   3   4,510   0.24 
KCBT Hard Red Winter Wheat Futures KW May 2017 contracts, expiring May 2017  43,300   2   (300)  (0.02)
CBOT Soybean Meal Futures SM July 2017 contracts, expiring July 2017  163,270   5   (2,270)  (0.12)
CBOT Soybean Futures S November 2017 contracts, expiring November 2017  196,437   4   1,412   0.07 
CBOT Corn Futures C December 2017 contracts, expiring December 2017  191,750   10   (1,750)  (0.09)
   1,140,971   39   742   0.04 
Total Open Futures Contracts** $1,993,750   68  $(89,700)  (4.72)

   Principal
Amount
  Market  
Value
   
Cash Equivalents   
United States Treasury Obligations                
U.S. Treasury Bills:               
0.34%, 1/05/2017     $250,000  $249,991   13.15 
0.45%, 2/16/2017      250,000   249,856   13.15 
0.49%, 5/04/2017      400,000   399,327   21.01 
0.60%, 5/18/2017      250,000   249,434   13.12 
0.64%, 6/22/2017      250,000   249,235   13.11 
Total Cash Equivalents         $1,397,843   73.54 
                 
* Represents less than 0.005%.      
** Collateral amounted to $208,306 on open futures contracts.      

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

99

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

United States Commodity Index Fund

  Year ended December
31, 2017
  Year ended December
31, 2016
  Year ended December
31, 2015
 
Income            
Gain (loss) on trading of commodity futures contracts:            
Realized gain (loss) on closed positions $22,989,718  $(22,063,913) $(127,566,722)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open positions  4,817,510   10,637,687   29,684,932 
Realized gain (loss) on short-term investments        3,645 
Interest income*  4,017,753   1,984,573   462,464 
ETF transaction fees  15,750   17,500   15,050 
             
Total income (loss)  31,840,731   (9,424,153)  (97,400,631)
             
Expenses            
Management fees (Note 4)  4,126,513   4,810,916   4,513,975 
Professional fees  626,130   553,904   948,893 
Brokerage commissions  527,610   776,649   711,491 
Directors' fees and insurance  69,558   74,029   113,376 
             
Total expenses  5,349,811   6,215,498   6,287,735 
             
Net income (loss) $26,490,920  $(15,639,651) $(103,688,366)
Net income (loss) per share $2.46  $(0.50) $(7.72)
Net income (loss) per weighted average share $2.04  $(1.07) $(8.16)
Weighted average shares outstanding  12,996,575   14,559,973   12,705,890 

 * Interest income does not exceed paid in kind of 5%.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

100

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

United States Copper Index Fund

  Year ended December
 31, 2017
  Year ended December
 31, 2016
  Year ended December
 31, 2015
 
Income            
Gain (loss) on trading of commodity futures contracts:            
Realized gain (loss) on closed positions $1,468,825  $(19,600) $(639,262)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open positions  793,363   269,200   16,900 
Realized gain (loss) on short-term investments  (23)     17 
Interest income*  80,677   9,625   1,408 
ETF transaction fees  4,550   1,400   700 
             
Total income (loss)  2,347,392   260,625   (620,237)
             
Expenses            
Management fees (Note 4)  67,217   19,170   12,760 
Professional fees  48,451   78,043   61,175 
Brokerage commissions  5,461   1,628   947 
Directors' fees and insurance  1,823   392   418 
             
Total expenses  122,952   99,233   75,300 
             
Expense waiver (Note 4)  (40,153)  (75,640)  (59,601)
             
Net expenses  82,799   23,593   15,699 
             
Net income (loss) $2,264,593  $237,032  $(635,936)
Net income (loss) per share $4.69  $2.12  $(4.86)
Net income (loss) per weighted average share $3.92  $1.18  $(5.39)
Weighted average shares outstanding  577,397   200,546   118,082 

* Interest income does not exceed paid in kind of 5%.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

101

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

United States Agriculture Index Fund

  Year ended December
 31, 2017
  Year ended December
 31, 2016
  Year ended December
 31, 2015
 
Income            
Gain (loss) on trading of commodity futures contracts:            
Realized gain (loss) on closed positions $(238,006) $26,386  $(373,442)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open positions  88,575   (95,857)  72,733 
Realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions  (31)  (113)  18 
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on foreign currency translations  612   504   (1,120)
Interest income*  13,898   6,205   1,466 
             
Total income (loss)  (134,952)  (62,875)  (300,345)
             
Expenses            
Management fees (Note 4)  12,013   12,901   13,599 
Professional fees  45,273   72,711   55,955 
Brokerage commissions  1,923   2,150   3,116 
Directors' fees and insurance  1,144   301   385 
             
Total expenses  60,353   88,063   73,055 
             
Expense waiver (Note 4)  (45,533)  (72,173)  (56,318)
             
Net expenses  14,820   15,890   16,737 
             
Net income (loss) $(149,772) $(78,765) $(317,082)
Net income (loss) per share $(1.50) $(0.79) $(3.17)
Net income (loss) per weighted average share $(1.50) $(0.79) $(3.17)
Weighted average shares outstanding  100,000   100,000   100,000 

* Interest income does not exceed paid in kind of 5%.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

102

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

  Year ended December
 31, 2017
  Year ended December
 31, 2016
  Year ended December
 31, 2015
 
Income            
Gain (loss) on trading of commodity futures contracts:            
Realized gain (loss) on closed positions $24,220,537  $(22,057,127) $(128,761,842)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open positions  5,699,448   10,811,030   29,911,129 
Realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions  (31)  (113)  18 
Realized gain (loss) on short-term investments  (23)     3,812 
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on foreign currency translations  612   504   (1,120)
Interest income*  4,112,328   2,000,403   465,496 
ETF transaction fees  20,300   18,900   16,100 
             
Total income (loss)  34,053,171   (9,226,403)  (98,366,407)
             
Expenses            
Management fees (Note 4)  4,205,743   4,842,987   4,542,429 
Professional fees  719,854   704,658   1,075,066 
Brokerage commissions  534,994   780,427   715,863 
Directors' fees and insurance  72,525   74,722   114,250 
             
Total expenses  5,533,116   6,402,794   6,447,608 
             
Expense waiver (Note 4)  (85,686)  (147,813)  (124,812)
             
Net expenses  5,447,430   6,254,981   6,322,796 
             
Net income (loss) $28,605,741  $(15,481,384) $(104,689,203)

* Interest income does not exceed paid in kind of 5%.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

103

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Changes in Capital

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

United States Commodity Index Fund

  Sponsor  Shareholders  Total 
Balances, at December 31, 2014 $  $709,120,840  $709,120,840 
Additions     155,622,096   155,622,096 
Redemptions     (240,418,600)  (240,418,600)
Net income (loss)     (103,688,366)  (103,688,366)
Balances, at December 31, 2015     520,635,970   520,635,970 
Additions     207,139,996   207,139,996 
Redemptions     (75,843,491)  (75,843,491)
Net income (loss)     (15,639,651)  (15,639,651)
Balances, at December 31, 2016     636,292,824   636,292,824 
Additions     49,804,005   49,804,005 
Redemptions     (211,345,839)  (211,345,839)
Net income (loss)     26,490,920   26,490,920 
Balances, at December 31, 2017 $  $501,241,910  $501,241,910 

Statements of Changes in Shares Outstanding

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

  Sponsor  Shareholders  Total 
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2014     14,700,000   14,700,000 
Additions     3,500,000   3,500,000 
Redemptions     (5,350,000)  (5,350,000)
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2015     12,850,000   12,850,000 
Additions     4,900,000   4,900,000 
Redemptions     (1,850,000)  (1,850,000)
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2016     15,900,000   15,900,000 
Additions     1,250,000   1,250,000 
Redemptions     (5,350,000)  (5,350,000)
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2017     11,800,000   11,800,000 

Net Asset Value Per Share:   
At December 31, 2014 $48.24 
At December 31, 2015 $40.52 
At December 31, 2016 $40.02 
At December 31, 2017 $42.48 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

104

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Changes in Capital

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

United States Copper Index Fund

  Sponsor  Shareholders  Total 
Balances, at December 31, 2014 $  $2,865,627  $2,865,627 
Additions     799,533   799,533 
Redemptions     (893,834)  (893,834)
Net income (loss)     (635,936)  (635,936)
Balances, at December 31, 2015     2,135,390   2,135,390 
Additions     3,352,232   3,352,232 
Redemptions         
Net income (loss)     237,032   237,032 
Balances, at December 31, 2016     5,724,654   5,724,654 
Additions     12,667,909   12,667,909 
Redemptions     (8,027,253)  (8,027,253)
Net income (loss)     2,264,593   2,264,593 
Balances, at December 31, 2017 $  $12,629,903  $12,629,903 

Statements of Changes in Shares Outstanding

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

  Sponsor  Shareholders  Total 
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2014     150,000   150,000 
Additions     50,000   50,000 
Redemptions     (50,000)  (50,000)
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2015     150,000   150,000 
Additions     200,000   200,000 
Redemptions         
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2016     350,000   350,000 
Additions     700,000   700,000 
Redemptions     (450,000)  (450,000)
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2017     600,000   600,000 

Net Asset Value Per Share:   
At December 31, 2014 $19.10 
At December 31, 2015 $14.24 
At December 31, 2016 $16.36 
At December 31, 2017 $21.05 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

105

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Changes in Capital

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

United States Agriculture Index Fund

  Sponsor  Shareholders  Total 
Balances, at December 31, 2014 $  $2,296,602  $2,296,602 
Additions         
Redemptions         
Net income (loss)     (317,082)  (317,082)
Balances, at December 31, 2015     1,979,520   1,979,520 
Additions         
Redemptions         
Net income (loss)     (78,765)  (78,765)
Balances, at December 31, 2016     1,900,755   1,900,755 
Additions         
Redemptions         
Net income (loss)     (149,772)  (149,772)
Balances, at December 31, 2017 $  $1,750,983  $1,750,983 

Statements of Changes in Shares Outstanding

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

  Sponsor  Shareholders  Total 
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2014     100,000   100,000 
Additions         
Redemptions         
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2015     100,000   100,000 
Additions         
Redemptions         
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2016     100,000   100,000 
Additions         
Redemptions         
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2017     100,000   100,000 

Net Asset Value Per Share:   
At December 31, 2014 $22.97 
At December 31, 2015 $19.80 
At December 31, 2016 $19.01 
At December 31, 2017 $17.51 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

106

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Changes in Capital

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

  Sponsor  Shareholders  Total 
Balances, at December 31, 2014 $  $716,264,689  $716,264,689 
Additions     156,421,629   156,421,629 
Redemptions     (243,246,235)  (243,246,235)
Net income (loss)     (104,689,203)  (104,689,203)
Balances, at December 31, 2015     524,750,880   524,750,880 
Additions     210,492,228   210,492,228 
Redemptions     (75,843,491)  (75,843,491)
Net income (loss)     (15,481,384)  (15,481,384)
Balances, at December 31, 2016     643,918,233   643,918,233 
Additions     62,471,914   62,471,914 
Redemptions     (219,373,092)  (219,373,092)
Net income (loss)     28,605,741   28,605,741 
Balances, at December 31, 2017 $  $515,622,796  $515,622,796 

Statements of Changes in Shares Outstanding

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

  Sponsor  Shareholders  Total 
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2014     15,050,000   15,050,000 
Additions     3,550,000   3,550,000 
Redemptions     (5,500,000)  (5,500,000)
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2015     13,100,000   13,100,000 
Additions     5,100,000   5,100,000 
Redemptions     (1,850,000)  (1,850,000)
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2016     16,350,000   16,350,000 
Additions     1,950,000   1,950,000 
Redemptions     (5,800,000)  (5,800,000)
Shares Outstanding, at December 31, 2017     12,500,000   12,500,000 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

107

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

United States Commodity Index Fund

  Year ended December
31, 2017
  Year ended December
 31, 2016
  Year ended December
31, 2015
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:            
Net income (loss) $26,490,920  $(15,639,651) $(103,688,366)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:            
(Increase) decrease in short-term investments  (71,291,769)      —  
(Increase) decrease in commodity futures trading account - cash and cash equivalents  7,441,591   15,941,203   24,230,603 
Unrealized (gain) loss on open futures contracts  (4,817,510)  (10,637,687)  (29,684,932)
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable  (12,337)      
(Increase) decrease in directors' fees and insurance receivable     6,190   (6,190)
(Increase) decrease in ETF transaction fees receivable     (350)  1,050 
Increase (decrease) in management fees payable  (119,158)  85,619   (172,237)
Increase (decrease) in professional fees payable  (20,651)  (133,821)  199,184 
Increase (decrease) in brokerage commissions payable  (10,710)  11,200    
Increase (decrease) in directors' fees and insurance payable  (668)  6,164   (15,638)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (42,340,292)  (10,361,133)  (109,136,526)
             
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:            
Addition of shares  49,804,005   207,139,996   155,622,096 
Redemption of shares  (215,240,793)  (69,828,108)  (284,155,249)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (165,436,788)  137,311,888   (128,533,153)
             
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents  (207,777,080)  126,950,755   (237,669,679)
             
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of year  601,266,026   474,315,271   711,984,950 
Cash and Cash Equivalents,end of year $393,488,946  $601,266,026  $474,315,271 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

108

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

United States Copper Index Fund

  Year ended December
 31, 2017
  Year ended December
31, 2016
  Year ended December
31, 2015
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:            
Net income (loss) $2,264,593  $237,032  $(635,936)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:            
(Increase) decrease in short-term investments  (2,175,807)      
(Increase) decrease in commodity futures trading account - cash and cash equivalents  (544,914)  180,275   (96,292)
Unrealized (gain) loss on open futures contracts  (793,363)  (269,200)  (16,900)
(Increase) decrease in receivable from Sponsor  35,487   (16,039)  (16,771)
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable  (1,137)     25 
(Increase) decrease in directors' fees and insurance receivable  (35)  32   (32)
(Increase) decrease in ETF transaction fees receivable  (350)      
Increase (decrease) in payable due to Broker  442,429       
Increase (decrease) in management fees payable  2,244   1,882   (456)
Increase (decrease) in professional fees payable  (28,380)  30,138   2,581 
Increase (decrease) in directors' fees and insurance payable  (47)  47   (35)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (799,280)  164,167   (763,816)
             
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:            
Addition of shares  10,562,974   3,352,232   799,533 
Redemption of shares  (8,027,253)     (893,834)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  2,535,721   3,352,232   (94,301)
             
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents  1,736,441   3,516,399   (858,117)
             
Cash and Cash Equivalents,beginning of year  5,387,655   1,871,256   2,729,373 
Cash and Cash Equivalents,end of year $7,124,096  $5,387,655  $1,871,256 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

109

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

United States Agriculture Index Fund

  Year ended December
 31, 2017
  Year ended December
31, 2016
  Year ended December
31, 2015
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:            
Net income (loss) $(149,772) $(78,765) $(317,082)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:            
(Increase) decrease in short-term investments  (296,550)      
(Increase) decrease in commodity futures trading account - cash and cash equivalents  48,934   (68,839)  83,359 
Unrealized (gain) loss on open futures contracts  (88,575)  95,857   (72,733)
(Increase) decrease in receivable from Sponsor  26,640   (15,849)  (17,185)
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable  (269)  46    
(Increase) decrease in directors' fees and insurance receivable  (183)      
Increase (decrease) in management fees payable  (97)  (42)  877 
Increase (decrease) in professional fees payable  (24,518)  28,414   1,131 
Increase (decrease) in directors' fees and insurance payable  (15)  (49)  (40)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (484,405)  (39,227)  (321,673)
             
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:            
Addition of shares         
Redemption of shares         
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities         
             
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents  (484,405)  (39,227)  (321,673)
             
Cash and Cash Equivalents,beginning of year  1,781,515   1,820,742   2,142,415 
Cash and Cash Equivalents,end of year $1,297,110  $1,781,515  $1,820,742 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

110

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

  Year ended December
31, 2017
  Year ended December
 31, 2016
  Year ended December
31, 2015
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:            
Net income (loss) $28,605,741  $(15,481,384) $(104,689,203)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:            
(Increase) decrease in short-term investments  (73,764,126)      
(Increase) decrease in commodity futures trading account - cash and cash equivalents  6,945,611   16,052,639   24,535,826 
Unrealized (gain) loss on open futures contracts  (5,699,448)  (10,811,030)  (29,911,129)
(Increase) decrease in receivable from Sponsor  62,127   (31,888)  3,829 
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable  (13,743)  46   36 
(Increase) decrease in directors' fees and insurance receivable  (218)  6,222   (6,222)
(Increase) decrease in ETF transaction fees receivable  (350)  (350)  1,050 
Increase (decrease) in payable due to Broker  442,429       
Increase (decrease) in management fees payable  (117,011)  87,459   (172,944)
Increase (decrease) in professional fees payable  (73,549)  (75,269)  163,900 
Increase (decrease) in brokerage commissions payable  (10,710)  11,200    
Increase (decrease) in directors' fees and insurance payable  (730)  6,162   (15,792)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (43,623,977)  (10,236,193)  (110,090,649)
             
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:            
Addition of shares  60,366,979   210,492,228   156,421,629 
Redemption of shares  (223,268,046)  (69,828,108)  (286,982,884)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (162,901,067)  140,664,120   (130,561,255)
             
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents  (206,525,044)  130,427,927   (240,651,904)
             
Cash and Cash Equivalents,beginning of year  608,435,196   478,007,269   718,659,173 
Cash and Cash Equivalents,end of year $401,910,152  $608,435,196  $478,007,269 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

111

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust

Notes to Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 20152021

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

The United States Commodity Index Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware Statutory Truststatutory trust on December 21, 2009. The Trust is a series trust formed pursuant to the Delaware Statutory Trust Act and includes the United States Commodity Index Fund (“USCI”), a commodity pool formed on April 1, 2010 and first made available to the public on August 10, 2010, and the United States Copper Index Fund (“CPER”), a commodity pool formed on November 26, 2010 and first made available to the public on November 15, 2011, and the United States Agriculture Index Fund (“USAG”), a commodity pool formed on November 26, 2010 and first made available to the public on April 13, 2012. In addition, a fourth series of the Trust, the USCF Canadian Crude Oil Index Fund (“UCCO”) was formed on June 1, 2016. UCCO is currently in registration and has not commenced operations as of the filing of this annual report on Form 10-K. USCF as the sponsor of the Trust and its series the United States Metals Index Fund (“USMI”), terminated USMI effective March 18, 2015 and USMI was also delisted from NYSE Arca. On March 24, 2015, USMI liquidated all its assets and distributed cash pro rata to all remaining shareholders as of such date.

2011.

USCI CPER and USAGCPER each issue shares (“shares”) that may be purchased and sold on the NYSE Arca, Inc. (“NYSE Arca”). USCI CPER, and USAGCPER are collectively referred to herein as the “Trust Series.” The Trust and each Trust Series operateof its series operates pursuant to the Fourth Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement dated as of December 15, 2017 (the “Trust Agreement”). United States Commodity Funds LLC (“USCF”) is the sponsor of the Trust and the Trust Series and is also responsible for the management of the Trust and the Trust Series. For purposes of the financial statement presentation, unless specified otherwise, all references will be to the Trust Series.

USCF has the power and authority to establish and designate one or more series of the Trust and to issue shares thereof, from time to time as it deems necessary or desirable. USCF has exclusive power to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences as between the shares of any series as to right of redemption, special and relative rights as to dividends and other distributions and on liquidation, conversion rights, and conditions under which the series shall have separate voting rights or no voting rights. The term for which the Trust is to exist commenced on the date of the filing of the Certificate of Trust, and the Trust and any Trust Series will exist in perpetuity, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Trust Agreement. Separate and distinct records must be maintained for each Trust Series and the assets associated with a Trust Series must be held in such separate and distinct records (directly or indirectly, including a nominee or otherwise) and accounted for in such separate and distinct records separately from the assets of any other Trust Series. Each Trust Series is separate from all other Trust Series created as series of the Trust in respect of the assets and liabilities allocated to that Trust Series and represents a separate investment portfolio of the Trust.

In connection with the Third Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated March 22, 2013, a new series of the Trust was designated on June 1, 2016, the USCF Canadian Crude Oil Index Fund (“UCCO”). UCCO is currently in registration and has not commenced operations as of the filing of this annual report on Form 10-K.

The sole Trustee of the Trust is Wilmington Trust Company (the “Trustee”), a Delaware banking corporation. The Trustee is unaffiliated with USCF. The Trustee’s duties and liabilities with respect to the offering of shares and the management of the Trust are limited to its express obligations under the Trust Agreement.

USCF is a member of the National Futures Association (the “NFA”) and became a commodity pool operator (“CPO”) registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) effective December 1, 2005. The Trust and each Trust Series havehas a fiscal year ending on December 31.

USCF is also the general partner of the United States Oil Fund, LP (“USO”), the United States Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNG”), the United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (“USL”), the United States Gasoline Fund, LP (“UGA”) and the United States Diesel-Heating Oil Fund, LP (“UHN”), which listed their limited partnership shares on the American Stock Exchange (the “AMEX”) under the ticker symbols “USO” on April 10, 2006, “UNG” on April 18, 2007, “USL” on December 6, 2007, “UGA” on February 26, 2008 and “UHN” on April 9, 2008, respectively. As a result of the acquisition of the AMEX by NYSE Euronext, each of USO’s, UNG’s, USL’s, UGA’s and UHN’s shares commenced trading on the NYSE Arca on November 25, 2008. USCF is also the general partner of the United States Short Oil Fund, LP (“DNO”), the United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNL”) and the United States Brent Oil Fund, LP (“BNO”), which listed their limited partnership shares on the NYSE Arca under the ticker symbols “DNO” on September 24, 2009, “UNL” on November 18, 2009.

USO, UNG, UGA, UNL, USL and “BNO” on June 2, 2010, respectively.

In addition, USCF is the sponsor of the USCF Funds Trust, a Delaware statutory trust, and each of its series, the REX S&P MLP Fund (“RMLP”), and the REX S&P MLP Inverse Fund (“MLPD”),which are currently in registration and have not commenced operations (together, the “REX Funds”), and the United States 3x Oil Fund (“USOU”) and the United States 3x Short Oil Fund (“USOD”), which commenced operations on July 20, 2017.

All funds listed previously, other than UCCO and the REX Funds,BNO are referred to collectively herein as the “Related Public Funds.”

112

Effective as of May 1, 2012, eachEach of USCI CPER and USAGCPER issue shares to certain authorized purchasers (“Authorized Participants”) by offering baskets consisting of 50,000 shares (“Creation Baskets”) through ALPS Distributors, Inc., as the marketing agent (the “Marketing Agent”). Prior to May 1, 2012, each of USCI, CPER and USAG issued shares to Authorized Participants by offering baskets consisting of 100,000 shares through the Marketing Agent. The purchase price for a Creation Basket is based upon the net asset value (“NAV”) of a share calculated shortly after the close of the core trading session on the NYSE Arca on the day the order to create the basket is properly received.

Authorized Participants pay each Trust Series a $350 transaction fee of $350 for each order placed to create one or more Creation Baskets or to redeem one or more baskets (“Redemption Baskets”), consisting of 50,000 shares. Shares may be purchased or sold on a nationally recognized securities exchange in smaller increments than a Creation Basket or Redemption Basket. Shares purchased or sold on a nationally recognized securities exchange are not purchased or sold at the per share NAV of each Trust Series but rather at market prices quoted on such exchange.

113

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”)GAAP as detailed in the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification. Each Trust Series is an investment company for accounting purposes and follows the accounting and reporting guidance in FASB Topic 946.

Revenue Recognition

Commodity futures contracts, forward contracts, physical commodities and related options are recorded on the trade date. All such transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis and marked to market daily. Unrealized gains or losses on open contracts are reflected in the statements of financial condition and represent the difference between the original contract amount and the market value (as determined by exchange settlement prices for futures contracts and related options and cash dealer prices at a predetermined time for forward contracts, physical commodities, and their related options) as of the last business day of the year or as of the last date of the financial statements. Changes in the unrealized gains or losses between periods are reflected in the statements of operations. Each Trust Series earns income on funds held at the custodian or futures commission merchant (“FCM”) at prevailing market rates earned on such investments.

Brokerage Commissions

Brokerage commissions on all open commodity futures contracts are accrued on a full-turn basis.

Income Taxes

The Trust Series are not subject to federal income taxes; each investor reports his/her allocable share of income, gain, loss, deductions or credits on his/her own income tax return.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, each Trust Series is required to determine whether a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any tax related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Each Trust Series files an income tax return in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and may file income tax returns in various U.S. states. None of the Trust Series is subject to income tax return examinations by major taxing authorities for years before 2014.2019. The tax benefit recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. De-recognition of a tax benefit previously recognized results in each Trust Series recording a tax liability that reduces net assets. However, each Trust Series’ conclusions regarding this policy may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, on-going analysis of and changes to tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. Each Trust Series recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax fees payable, if assessed. No interest expense or penalties have been recognized as of and for the yearperiod ended December 31, 20172023 for any Trust Series.

Trust Capital and Allocation of Income and Losses

Profit or loss shall be allocated among the shareholders of each Trust Series in proportion to the number of shares each investor holds as of the close of each month. USCF may revise, alter or otherwise modify this method of allocation as described in the Trust Agreement.

Creations and Redemptions

Authorized Participants may purchase Creation Baskets or redeem Redemption Baskets only in blocks of 50,000 shares. Effective as of May 1, 2012, Authorized Participants may purchase Creation Baskets or redeem Redemption Baskets for USCI CPER and USAGCPER only in blocks of 50,000 shares at a price equal to the NAV of the shares calculated shortly after the close of the core trading session on the NYSE Arca on the day the order is placed. Prior to May 1, 2012, Authorized Participants could only purchase Creation Baskets or redeem Redemption Baskets for USCI, CPER and USAG in blocks of 100,000 shares.

Each Trust Series receives or pays the proceeds from shares sold or redeemed within two business days after the trade date of the purchase or redemption. The amounts due from Authorized Participants are reflected in each Trust Series’ statements of financial condition as receivable for shares sold and amounts payable to Authorized Participants upon redemption are reflected as payable for shares redeemed.

Authorized Participants pay each Trust Series a $350 transaction fee for each order placed to create one or more Creation Baskets or to redeem one or more Redemption Baskets.

113

114

Trust Capital and Allocation of Income and Losses

Profit or loss shall be allocated among the shareholders of each Trust Series in proportion to the weighted-average number of shares each investor holds as of the close of each month. USCF may revise, alter or otherwise modify this method of allocation as described in the Trust Agreement.

Calculation of Per Share NAV

Each Trust Series’ per share NAV is calculated on each NYSE Arca trading day by taking the current market value of its total assets, subtracting any liabilities and dividing thethat amount by the total number of shares issued and outstanding. Each Trust Series uses the closing prices on the relevant Futures Exchanges (as defined in Note 3 below) of the Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts (as defined in Note 3 below) that at any given time make up the Applicable Index (as defined in Note 3 below) (determined at the earlier of the close of such exchange or 2:30 p.m. New York time) for the contracts traded on the Futures Exchanges, but calculates or determines the value of all other investments of each Trust Series using market quotations, if available, or other information customarily used to determine the fair value of such investments.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Net income (loss) per share is the difference between the per share NAV at the beginning of each period and the per share NAV at the end of each period. The weighted average number of shares outstanding was computed for purposes of disclosing net income (loss) per weighted average share. The weighted average shares are equal to the number of shares outstanding at the end of the period, adjusted proportionately for shares added and redeemed based on the amount of time the shares were outstanding during such period. As of December 31, 2017,2023, USCF held 5 shares of USCI and 40 shares of CPER and 5 shares of USAG.

CPER.

Offering Costs

Offering costs incurred in connection with the registration of shares prior to the commencement of the offering are borne by USCF. Offering costs incurred in connection with the registration of additional shares after the commencement of the offering are borne by each Trust Series. These costs include registration fees paid to regulatory agencies and all legal, accounting, printing and other expenses associated with such offerings. Costs borne by the Trust Series after the commencement of an offering are accounted for as a deferred charge and thereafter amortized to expense over twelve months on a straight-line basis or a shorter period if warranted.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include money market funds and overnight deposits or time deposits with original maturity dates of sixthree months or less.

Reclassifications

Reclassification

Certain prior year amounts have beenin the accompanying financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires USCF to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of the revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions.

NOTE 3 - TRUST SERIES

In connection with the execution of the First Trust Agreement on April 1, 2010, USCI was designated as the first series of the Trust. USCF contributed $1,000 to the Trust upon its formation on December 21, 2009, representing an initial contribution of capital to the Trust. Following the designation of USCI as the first series of the Trust, the initial capital contribution of $1,000 was transferred from the Trust to USCI and deemed an initial contribution to USCI. In connection with the commencement of USCI’s initial offering of shares, USCF received 20 Sponsor Shares of USCI in exchange for the previously received capital contribution, representing a beneficial ownership interest in USCI.

115

On July 30, 2010, USCI received a notice of effectiveness from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)SEC for its registration of 50,000,000 shares on Form S-1 with the SEC. On August 10, 2010, USCI listed its shares on the NYSE Arca under the ticker symbol “USCI”. USCI established its initial per share NAV by setting the price at $50.00 and issued 100,000 shares in exchange for $5,000,000 on August 10, 2010. USCI also commenced investment operations on August 10, 2010 by purchasing Futures Contracts traded on the Futures Exchanges. In order to satisfy NYSE Arca listing standards that at least 100,000 shares be outstanding at the beginning of the trading day on the NYSE Arca, USCF purchased the initial Creation Basket from the initial Authorized Participant at the initial offering price. The $1,000 fee that would otherwise be charged to the Authorized Participant in connection with an order to create or redeem was waived in connection with the initial Creation Basket. USCF held such initial Creation Basket until September 3, 2010, at which time the initial Authorized Participant repurchased the shares comprising such basket in accordance with the specified conditions noted above. On September 14, 2011, USCF redeemed the 20 Sponsor Shares of USCI and, on September 19, 2011, USCF purchased five5 shares of USCI in the open market. On June 10, 2012, USCF received 40 Sponsor Shares of USMI in exchange for the previously received capital contribution, representing a beneficial interest in USMI. On August 27, 2012, USCF redeemed the 40 Sponsor Shares of USMI and on September 4, 2013, purchased 5 shares of USMI on the open market. On March 18, 2015, all Sponsor Shares of USMI were redeemed and USMI discontinued trading.

114

In connection with the Second Amended and Restated Trust Agreement dated November 10, 2010, USMI, USAG and CPER werewas designated as three additional series of the Trust. USCF and the Trustee entered into the Fourth Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement effective as of December 15, 2017. Following the designation of theCPER as an additional series, USCF made an initial capital contribution of $3,000 was transferred from USCF to the Trust. OnTrust and on November 10, 2010, the Trust transferred $1,000 to each of USMI, USAG and CPER, which was deemed a capital contribution to eachthe series. On November 14, 2011, USCF received 40 Sponsor Shares of CPER in exchange for the previously received capital contribution, representing a beneficial interest in CPER. On December 7, 2011, USCF redeemed the 40 Sponsor Shares of CPER and purchased 40 shares of CPER in the open market. On April 13, 2012, USCF received 40 Sponsor Shares of USAG in exchange for the previously received capital contribution, representing a beneficial interest in USAG. On June 28, 2012, USCF redeemed the 40 Sponsor Shares of USAG and on October 3, 2012, purchased 5 shares of USAG on the open market.

CPER and USAG received notice of effectiveness from the SEC for its registration of 30,000,000 CPER shares and 20,000,000 USAG shares on September 6, 2011. The order to permit listing CPER and USAG on the NYSE Arca was received on October 20, 2011. On November 15, 2011, CPER listed its shares on the NYSE Arca under the ticker symbol “CPER.” CPER established its initial per share NAV by setting the price at $25 and issued 100,000 shares to the initial Authorized Participant, Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp., in exchange for $2,500,000 in cash on November 15, 2011. The $1,000 fee that would otherwise be charged to the Authorized Participant in connection with an order to create or redeem was waived in connection with the initial Creation Basket.

On April 13, 2012, USAG listed its shares on the NYSE Arca under the ticker symbol “USAG.” USAG established its initial per share NAV by setting the price at $25. On April 14, 2012, USCF purchased two initial Creation Baskets of USAG. In accordance with applicable requirements of Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (“Exchange Act”), no Creation Baskets were offered to Authorized Participants nor were the shares listed on the NYSE Arca until five business days had elapsed from the date of USCF’s purchase of the initial Creation Basket on April 4, 2012. The $1,000 fee that would have otherwise been charged in connection with an order to create or redeem was waived in connection with the initial Creation Basket.

A new series of the Trust was designated on June 1, 2016, the USCF Canadian Crude Oil Index Fund (“UCCO”). UCCO has not commenced operations as of the filing of this annual report on Form 10-K. USCF and the Trustee entered into the Fourth Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement effective as of December 15, 2017.

USCI’s Investment Objective

The investment objective of USCI is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share net asset value (“NAV”) to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total ReturnSM (the “SDCI”), less USCI’s expenses.

USCI invests in futuresThe SDCI is designed to reflect the performance of a diversified group of commodities. The SDCI is owned and maintained by SummerHaven Index Management, LLC (“SHIM”) and is calculated and published by Bloomberg L.P. Futures contracts for the commodities thatcomprising the SDCI are currently traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (the “NYMEX”(“NYMEX”), ICE Futures (“ICE Futures”), Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”), Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”), London Metal Exchange (“LME”), and Commodity Exchange, Inc. (“COMEX”) or on other foreign exchanges (the together with the NYMEX, ICE Futures, CBOT, CME LME, COMEX and other foreign exchanges, collectively,LME, the “Futures Exchanges”) (such futures contracts,and are collectively “Futures Contracts”) and, to a lesser extent, in order to comply with regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, other commodity-based contracts and instruments such as cash-settled options on Futures Contracts, forward contracts relating to commodities, cleared swap contracts and other non-exchange traded over-the-counter (“OTC”) transactions that are based on the price of commodities and Futures Contracts (collectively, “Other Commodity-Related Investments”). Market conditions that USCF currently anticipates could cause USCI to invest in Other Commodity Related Investments would be those allowing USCI to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing. Futures Contracts and Other Commodity-Related Investments collectively are referred to herein as “Commodity Interests.“Futures Contracts.

The investment objective of USCI is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share NAV to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total ReturnSM (the “SDCI”), less USCI’s expenses. USCF does not intend to operate USCI in a fashion such that its per share NAV will equal, in dollar terms, the spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts (as defined below) that comprise the SDCI or the prices of any particular group of Futures Contracts. USCI will not seek to achieve its stated investment objective over a period of time greater than one day. USCI believes that it is not practical to manage the portfolio to achieve such an investment goal when investing in Futures Contracts and Other Commodity-Related Investments. The SDCI is designed to reflect the performance of a diversified group of commodities. The SDCI is comprised of 14 Futures Contracts that are selected on a monthly basis from a list of 27 possible Futures Contracts. The Futures Contracts that at any given time make up the SDCI are referred to herein as “Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.” The SDCI is owned and maintainedrelative weighting of the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts will change on a monthly basis, based on quantitative formulas relating to the prices of the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts developed by SummerHaven Index Management, LLC (“SHIM”) and calculated and publishedSHIM.

USCI seeks to achieve its investment objective by Bloomberg, L.P. USCI invests firstinvesting primarily in the current ApplicableBenchmark Component Futures Contracts. Then, if constrained by regulatory requirements, risk mitigation measures, liquidity requirements or in view of market conditions, USCI will invest next in other Futures Contracts based on the same commodity as the futures contracts subject to such regulatory constraints or market conditions, and finally, to a lesser extent, in other exchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts if one or more other Futures Contracts is not available. When USCI has invested to the fullest extent possible in exchange-traded futures contracts, USCI may then invest in other contracts and instruments based on the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, other Futures Contracts or the commodities included in the SDCI, such as cash-settled options, forward contracts, cleared swap contracts and swap contracts other than cleared swap contracts. Other exchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and other contracts and instruments based on the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts are collectively referred to as “Other Commodity-Related Investments,” and together with Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and other Futures Contracts, intended“Commodity Interests.”

116

USCI seeks to replicateachieve its investment objective by investing so that the returnaverage daily percentage change in USCI’s NAV for any period of 30 successive valuation days will be within plus/minus ten percent (10%) of the average daily percentage change in the price of the SDCI over the same period. USCF believes that the market arbitrage opportunities will cause the daily changes in USCI’s share price on the currentNYSE Arca on a percentage basis to closely track the daily changes in USCI’s per share NAV on a percentage basis. USCF believes that the net effect of this expected relationship and the expected relationship described above between USCI’s per share NAV and the SDCI will be that the daily changes in the price of USCI’s shares on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis will closely track the daily changes in the SDCI on a percentage basis, less USCI’s expenses. While USCI is composed of Benchmark Component Futures Contracts and thereafter may hold Futures Contracts inis therefore a particular commodity other than one specified asmeasure of the prices of the corresponding commodities comprising the SDCI for future delivery, there is nonetheless expected to be a reasonable degree of correlation between the SDCI and the cash or spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component Futures Contract,Contracts.

Investors should be aware that USCI’s investment objective is not for its NAV or may hold Other Commodity-Related Investments that are intendedmarket price of shares to replicateequal, in dollar terms, the return onspot prices of the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, but may fail to closely track the SDCI’s total return movements. If USCI increases in size, and due to its obligations to comply with regulatory limits or due to other market pricing or liquidity factors, USCI may invest in Futures Contract months other than the designated month specified ascommodities underlying the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts or the prices of any particular group of futures contracts. USCI will not seek to achieve its stated investment objective over a period of time greater than one day. This is because natural market forces called contango and backwardation have impacted the total return on an investment in Other Commodity-Related Investments,USCI’s shares during the past year relative to a hypothetical direct investment in the various commodities and, in the future, it is likely that the relationship between the market price of USCI’s shares and changes in the spot prices of the underlying commodities will continue to be impacted by contango and backwardation. (It is important to note that the disclosure above ignores the potential costs associated with physically owning and storing the commodities, which may have the effect of increasing transaction related expenses and may result in increased tracking error.could be substantial.)

USCI’s shares began trading on August 10, 2010. As of December 31, 2017,2023, USCI held 1,794 813 Futures Contracts on the NYMEX, 3,297 held 1,308 Futures Contracts on the ICE Futures, 1,573 held 918 Futures Contracts on the CBOT, 1,225 held 182 Futures Contracts on the CME, 6,796 held 1,360 Futures Contracts on the LME and 701 held 185 Futures Contracts on the COMEX, totaling 15,386 4,766 futures contracts.

115

CPER’s Investment Objective

The investment objective of CPER is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share NAV to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the SummerHaven Copper Index Total ReturnSM (the “SCI”), plus interest earned on CPER’s collateral holdings, less CPER’s expenses. USCF does not intend to operate CPER in a fashion such that its per share NAV will equal, in dollar terms, the spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts (as defined below) that comprise the SCI or the prices of any particular group of Futures Contracts. CPER will not seek to achieve a stated investment objective over a period of time greater than one day. USCF believes that it is not practical to manage the portfolio to achieve such an investment goal when investing in Futures Contracts and Other Copper-Related Investments (as defined below).

The SCI is designed to reflect the performance of the investment returns from a portfolio of copper futures contracts.contracts on the COMEX. The SCI is owned and maintained by SHIM and calculated and published by the NYSE Arca. The SCI is comprised of either twoone or three Eligible Copper Futures Contracts that are selected on a monthly basis based on quantitative formulas relating to the prices of the Eligible Copper Futures Contracts developed by SHIM. The Eligible Copper Futures Contracts that at any given time make up the SCI are referred to herein as “Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts.”

CPER seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing to the fullest extent possibleprimarily in the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts. Then, if constrained by regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, CPER willmay also, to a lesser extent, invest next in other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts and finally to a lesser extent, in other exchange traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar tobeyond the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts if one or more other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts is not available. When CPER has invested to the fullest extent possible in exchange-traded futures contracts, CPER may then invest in other contracts and instruments based on the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts or copper, such as cash-settled options, forward contracts, cleared swap contracts and swap contracts other than cleared swap contracts. Other exchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, as well as other investments based on copper, such as cash-settled options on Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, forward contracts for copper, cleared swap contracts, non-cleared “over-the-counter” or “OTC” transactions that are based on the price of copper and other contractsBenchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts and instrumentsindices based on the foregoing (collectively, “Other Copper-Related Investments”). The following factors, among others, may be considered when determining CPER’s investments in Eligible Copper Futures Contracts or in Other Copper-Related Investments: regulatory requirements, risk mitigation measures taken by CPER, CPER’s FCMs, counterparties or other market participants, liquidity and market conditions. Other factors that may impact CPER’s investments in other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts, other exchange-traded futures contracts, or Other Copper-Related Investments include allowing CPER to obtain greater liquidity or to execute transactions with more favorable pricing. In addition, CPER may need to hold significant portions of its portfolio in cash beyond what it has historically held for reasons including (but not limited to) the need to address the changes in market conditions, regulatory requirements or risk mitigation measures or the need to satisfy potential margin requirements. For convenience and unless otherwise specified, Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, other Eligible Copper Futures Contracts and Other Copper-Related Investments collectively are referred to as “Copper Interests.”

CPER seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing so that the average daily percentage change in CPER’s NAV for any period of 30 successive valuation days will be within plus/minus ten percent (10%) of the average daily percentage change in the prices of the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts are referredover the same period. USCF believes that market arbitrage opportunities will cause daily changes in CPER’s share price on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis, to collectively as “Other Copper-Related Investments,”closely track the daily changes in CPER’s per share NAV on a percentage basis. USCF believes that the net effect of this expected relationship and together withthe expected relationship described above

117

between CPER’s per share NAV and the SCI will be that the daily changes in the price of CPER’s shares on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis will closely track the daily changes in the SCI on a percentage basis, less CPER’s expenses. While CPER is composed of Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts and other Eligibleis therefore a measure of the prices of the corresponding commodities comprising the SCI for future delivery, there is nonetheless expected to be a reasonable degree of correlation between the SCI and the cash or spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts, “Copper Interests.”Contracts.

Investors should be aware that CPER’s shares began trading on November 15, 2011. As of December 31, 2017, CPER held 153 Futures Contracts on the COMEX.

USAG’s Investment Objective

The investment objective is not for its NAV or market price of USAG is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share NAVshares to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the SummerHaven Dynamic Agriculture Index Total ReturnSM (the “SDAI”), less USAG’s expenses. USCF does not intend to operate USAG in a fashion such that its per share NAV will equal, in dollar terms, the spot prices of the commodities underlying the Benchmark Component AgricultureCopper Futures Contracts (as defined below) that comprise the SDAI or the prices of any particular group of Futures Contracts. USAGfutures contracts. CPER will not seek to achieve its stated investment objective over a period of time greater than one day. USCF believes thatThis is because natural market forces called contango and backwardation have impacted the total return on an investment in CPER’s shares during the past year relative to a hypothetical direct investment in various commodities and, in the future, it is not practical to managelikely that the portfolio to achieve such an investment goal when investingrelationship between the market price of CPER’s shares and changes in Futures Contracts and Other Agriculture-Related Investments (as defined below). The SDAI is designed to reflect the performance of a diversified group of agricultural commodities. The SDAI is owned and maintained by SHIM and calculated and published by the NYSE Arca. Futures contracts for the agricultural commodities comprising the SDAI are traded on ICE Future US, ICE Futures Canada, the CBOT, the Kansas City Board of Trade (“KCBT”) and the CME and are collectively referred to herein as “Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts.” The SDAI is comprised of 14 Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts that are selected on a monthly basis based on quantitative formulas developed by SHIM. The Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts that at any given time make up the SDAI are referred to herein as “Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts.” The relative weighting of the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts will change on a monthly basis, based on quantitative formulas relating to thespot prices of the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts developedunderlying commodities will continue to be so impacted by SHIM.

USAG seekscontango and backwardation. (It is important to achieve its investment objective by investing tonote that the fullest extent possible indisclosure above ignores the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts. Then, if constrained by regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, USAG will invest next in other Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts based onpotential costs associated with physically owning and storing the same agricultural commodity as the futures contracts subject to such regulatory constraints or market conditions, and finally, to a lesser extent, in other exchange traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts if one or more other Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts is not available. When USAG has invested to the fullest extent possible in exchange-traded futures contracts, USAG may then invest in other contracts and instruments based on the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts, other Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts or the agricultural commodities, included in the SDAI, such as cash-settled options, forward contracts, cleared swap contracts and swap contracts other than cleared swap contracts. Other exchange-traded futures contracts that are economically identical or substantially similar to the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts and other contracts and instruments based on the Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts, as well as metals included in the SDAI, are collectively referred to as “Other Agriculture-Related Investments,” and together with Benchmark Component Agriculture Futures Contracts and other Eligible Agriculture Futures Contracts, “Agriculture Interests.” USAG’swhich could be substantial.) CPER’s shares began trading on April 13, 2012.November 15, 2011. As of December 31, 2017, USAG2023, CPER held 34 1,342 Futures Contracts on the ICE Futures, 24 Futures Contracts on the CBOT, 10 Futures Contracts on the CME and 2 Futures Contract on the KCBT, totaling 70 futures contracts.

COMEX.

Other Defined Terms – Trust Series

The SDCI the SCI and the SDAISCI are referred to throughout these Notes to Financial Statements collectively as the “Applicable Index” or “Indices.”

116

Benchmark Component Futures Contracts, Benchmark Component Copper Futures Contracts and Benchmark Component AgricultureCopper Futures Contracts are referred to throughout these Notes to Financial Statements collectively as “Applicable Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.”

Other Commodity-Related Investments and Other Copper-Related Investments and Other Agriculture-Related Interests are referred to throughout these Notes to Financial Statements collectively as “Other Related Investments.”

Trading Advisor and Trustee

The Trust Series’ trading advisor is SummerHaven Investment Management, LLC (“SummerHaven”), a Delaware limited liability company that is registered as a commodity trading advisor and CPO with the CFTC and is a member of the NFA. In addition, SummerHaven is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 with the SEC. SummerHaven provides advisory services to USCF with respect to the Applicable Index of each Trust Series and the investment decisions of each Trust Series.

The Trustee accepts service of legal process on the Trust in the State of Delaware and makes certain filings under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act. The Trustee does not owe any other duties to the Trust, USCF or the shareholders.

NOTE 4 - FEES PAID BY EACH TRUST SERIES AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

USCF Management Fee

Under the Trust Agreement, USCF is responsible for investing the assets of each Trust Series in accordance with the objectives and policies of each such Trust Series. In addition, USCF has arranged for one or more third parties to provide trading advisory, administrative, custody, accounting, transfer agency and other necessary services to each Trust Series. For these services, each of USCI CPER and USAGCPER is contractually obligated to pay USCF a fee, which is paid monthly, equal to 0.95% per annum of average daily total net assets. Effective January 1, 2016, USCF permanently lowered the management fee toof 0.80% (80 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for USCI and 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for both CPER and USAG, respectively.

CPER.

Trustee Fee

The Trustee is the Delaware trustee of the Trust. In connection with the Trustee’s services, USCF is responsible for paying the Trustee’s annual fee in the amount of $3,000.

$3,300.

Ongoing Registration Fees and Other Offering Expenses

Each Trust Series pays the costs and expenses associated with the ongoing registration of its shares subsequent to the initial offering. These costs include registration or other fees paid to regulatory agencies in connection with the offer and sale of shares, and all legal, accounting, printing and other expenses associated with such offer and sale. DuringFor the years ended December 31,  2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015, none2021,

118

USCI incurred any$0, $6,617 and $32,976 respectively, in registration fees or otherand offering expenses.

For the years ended December 31,  2023, 2022 and 2021, CPER incurred $0, 24,092 and $117,738 respectively, in registration fees and offering expenses. On April 30, 2021, 10,000,000 additional shares were registered for USCI and 50,000,000 additional shares were registered for CPER. On January 27, 2023 the SEC declared effective registration statements filed by each of USCI and CPER that registered an unlimited number of shares. As a result, USCI and CPER each have an unlimited number of shares that can be issued in the form of Creation Baskets.

Independent Directors’ and Officers’ Expenses

Each Trust Series is responsible for paying its portion of the directors’ fees and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for such Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. Each Trust Series shares the fees and expenses on a pro rata basis with each other Trust Series and each other Related Public Fund, as described above, based on the relative assets of each fund computed on a daily basis. These fees and expenses for the year endedending December 31, 2017 amounted2023 are estimated to be a total of $536,375$1,210,000 for the Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. USCI’s portion of such fees and expenses for the year endedending December 31, 2017 was $69,558,2023 totaled $81,283 and CPER’s portion of such fees and expenses for the year endedending December 31, 2017 was $1,823. USAG’s portion of such fees and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $1,144.2023 totaled $76,810. For the year endedending December 31, 2016,2022, these fees and expenses were $582,050$1,258,000 for the Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. USCI’s portion of such fees and expenses for the year endedending December 31, 20162022 was $74,029,$71,043 and CPER’s portion of such fees and expenses for the year ending December 31, 2022 was $80,390. For the year ended December 31, 2016 was $392, USAG’s2021, these fees and expenses were $1,081,963 for the Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. USCI’s portion of such fees and expenses for the year endedending December 31, 20162021  was $301.

$45,061 and CPER’s portion of such fees and expenses for the year ending December 31, 2021 was $53,747.

Investor Tax Reporting Cost

The fees and expenses associated with each Trust Series’ audit expenses and tax accounting and reporting requirements are paid by such Trust Series. These costs amounted to a total of $590,000 forFor the yearyears ended December 31, 2017 for2023, 2022 and 2021, USCI $46,000 forincurred $369,911, $553,920 and $198,650 respectively, in investor tax reporting costs. For the yearyears ended December 31,  2017 for2023, 2022 and 2021, CPER incurred $431,530, $423,101 and $45,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 for USAG.$280,967 respectively, in investor tax reporting costs. Tax reporting costs fluctuate between years due to the number of shareholders during any given year.

Other Expenses and Fees and Expense Waivers

In addition to the fees described above, each Trust Series pays all brokerage fees and other expenses in connection with the operation of such Trust Series, excluding costs and expenses paid by USCF as outlined in Note 5 – Contracts and Agreementsbelow. In addition, USCF payspreviously paid certain expenses normally borne by each of CPER and USAG to the extent that such expenses exceed 0.15% (15 basis points) of each of CPER’s and USAG’s NAV, on an annualized basis. USCF has no obligation to continueterminated such payments into subsequent periods.expense waiver as of April 30, 2021. For the year ended December 31,  2017,2023, 2022 and 2021 USCF waived $40,153 in$0, $0 and $63,274, respectively, of expenses for CPER and $45,533 for USAG.CPER. This voluntary expense waiver iswas in addition to those amounts USCF is contractually obligated to pay as described inNote 5 – Contracts and Agreements below.

117

below and terminated on April 30, 2021.

NOTE 5 - CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS

Marketing Agent Agreement

USCF and the Trust, each on its own behalf and on behalf of each Trust Series, are party to a marketing agent agreement, dated as of July 22, 2010, as amended from time to time, with the Marketing Agent, whereby the Marketing Agent provides certain marketing services for each Trust Series as outlined in the agreement. TheThrough September 30, 2022, the fee of the Marketing Agent, which is borne by USCF, iswas equal to 0.06% on each Trust Series’ assets up to $3 billion and 0.04% on each Trust Series’ assets in excess of $3 billion. The agreement with the Marketing Agent has been amended and, commencing October 1, 2022, the fee of the Marketing Agent, which is calculated daily and payable monthly and borne by USCF, is equal to 0.10% of USCI’s total net assets and 0.025% of CPER’s total net assets. In no event may the aggregate compensation paid to the Marketing Agent and any affiliate of USCF for distribution relateddistribution-related services exceed 10% of the gross proceeds of each Trust Series’ offering.

The above fee does not include website construction and development costs, which are also borne by USCF.

119

Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.Table of Contents

Custody, Transfer Agency and Fund Administration and Accounting Services Agreements

USCF andengaged The Bank of New York Mellon, a New York corporation authorized to do a banking business (“BNY Mellon”), to provide the Trust on its own behalfSeries and on behalfeach of each Trust Series, are also partythe Related Public Funds with certain custodial, administrative and accounting, and transfer agency services, pursuant to a custodian agreement,the following agreements with BNY Mellon dated July 22, 2010, as amended from time to time, with Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (“BBH&Co.”of March 20, 2020 (together, the “BNY Mellon Agreements”), whereby BBH&Co. holds investments on behalfwhich were effective as of each Trust Series.April 1, 2020: (i) a Custody Agreement; (ii) a Fund Administration and Accounting Agreement; and (iii) a Transfer Agency and Service Agreement. USCF pays the fees of the custodian, which are determined by the parties from time to time. In addition, USCF and the Trust, on its own behalf and on behalf of each Trust Series, are party to an administrative agency agreement, dated July 22, 2010, as amended from time to time, with BBH&Co., whereby BBH&Co. acts as the administrative agent, transfer agent and registrar for each Trust Series. USCF also pays the fees of BBH&Co.BNY Mellon for its services under such agreementthe BNY Mellon Agreements and such fees are determined by the parties from time to time.

Currently, USCF pays BBH&Co. for its services, in the foregoing capacities, a minimum amount of $75,000 annually for its custody, fund accounting and fund administration services rendered to each Trust Series and each of the Related Public Funds, as well as a $20,000 annual fee for its transfer agency services. In addition, USCF pays BBH&Co. an asset-based charge of: (a) 0.06% for the first $500 million of the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets, (b) 0.0465% for the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets greater than $500 million but less than $1 billion, and (c) 0.035% once the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets exceed $1 billion. The annual minimum amount will not apply if the asset-based charge for all accounts in the aggregate exceeds $75,000. USCF also pays BBH&Co. transaction fees ranging from $7 to $15 per transaction.

Brokerage and Futures Commission Merchant Agreements

On July 7, 2014, theThe Trust, on behalf of each Trust Seriesof USCI and CPER, entered into a Futures and Cleared SwapsDerivatives Transactions Customer Account Agreement with Wells Fargo Securities,RBC Capital Markets LLC (“WFS”RBC”). WFS is, in June of 2018. The Trust, on behalf of each of USCI and CPER, entered into a Commodity Futures Customer Agreement with Marex North America, LLC (“MNA”), in August of 2021. RBC and MNA are each referred to as the FCM.a “Futures Commissions Merchant” or “FCM.” The agreements with the FCMs for each Trust Series require the FCMFCMs to provide services to eachthe applicable Trust Series in connection with the purchase and sale of Futures Contracts and Other Related Investmentsfutures contracts that may be purchased and sold by or through the applicable FCM for eachthe applicable Trust Series’ account. In accordance with theeach agreement, the FCM charges eachthe applicable Trust Series commissions of approximately $7 to $8 per round-turn trade, including applicable exchange, clearing and NFA fees for Futures Contracts and options on Futures Contracts. Such fees include those incurred when purchasing Futures Contracts and options on Futures Contracts when each Trust Series issues shares as a result of a Creation Basket, as well as fees incurred when selling Futures ContactsContracts and options on Futures Contracts when each Trust Series redeems shares as a result of a Redemption Basket. Such fees are also incurred when Futures Contracts and options on Futures Contracts are purchased or redeemed for the purpose of rebalancing the portfolio. Each Trust Series also incurs commissions to brokers for the purchase and sale of Futures Contracts, Other Commodity-Related Investments or short-term obligations of the United States of two years or less (“Treasuries”).

USCI

Year ended

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

 

December 31, 

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2023

2022

2021

 

Total commissions accrued to brokers

$

160,196

$

208,672

$

151,236

Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets

 

0.08

%

 

0.07

%  

 

0.07

%

USCI 

  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2017
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2016
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2015
 
Total commissions accrued to brokers $527,610  $776,649  $711,491 
Total commissions as an annualized percentage of net assets  0.10%  0.13%  0.13%
Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing $505,199  $752,519  $675,051 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing  95.75%  96.89%  94.88%
Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity $22,411  $24,130  $36,440 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity  4.25%  3.11%  5.12%

The decrease in USCI’s total commissions accrued to brokers for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, was due primarily a result of decreased brokerage fees due to a lower number of contracts held and traded, and fortraded.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to2023, the monthly average volume of open future contract notional value was $259,074,838. For the year ended December 31, 2015,2022, the increase in USCI’s total commissions accrued to brokersmonthly average volume of open future contract notional value was primarily a result of increased brokerage fees due to a higher number of contracts held and traded. However, there can be no assurance that commission costs and portfolio turnover will not cause commission expenses to rise in future quarters.

118

$384,940,596.

CPER

Year ended

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

 

December 31, 

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2023

2022

2021

 

Total commissions accrued to brokers

$

38,792

$

55,612

$

65,088

Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets

 

0.03

%

 

0.03

%  

 

0.03

%

  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2017
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2016
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2015
 
Total commissions accrued to brokers $5,461  $1,628  $947 
Total commissions as an annualized percentage of net assets  0.05%  0.06%  0.05%
Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing $4,390  $1,455  $588 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing  80.39%  89.37%  62.09%
Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity $1,071  $173  $359 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity  19.61%  10.63%  37.91%

The increasedecrease in CPER’s total commissions accrued to brokers for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, was primarily a result of increased brokerage fees due to a higher number of contracts held and traded as well as net creates; and for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, the increase in CPER’s total commissions accrued to brokers was primarily a result of increased brokerage fees due to a higher number of contracts held and traded as well as net creates. However, there can be no assurance that commission costs and portfolio turnover will not cause commission expenses to rise in future quarters.

USAG

  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2017
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2016
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2015
 
Total commissions accrued to brokers $1,923  $2,150  $3,116 
Total commissions as an annualized percentage of net assets  0.10%  0.11%  0.15%
Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing $1,923  $2,150  $3,116 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing  100.00%  100.00%  100.00%
Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity $  $  $ 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity  %  %  %

USAG’s total commissions accrued to brokers for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, was lower primarily as a result of decreased brokerage fees due to a lower number of contracts held and traded; and for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, was lower primarily as a result of decreased brokerage fees due to a lower number of contracts held and traded.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, the monthly average volume of open future contract notional value was $143,271,265. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the monthly average volume of open future contract notional value was $201,590,276.

120

SummerHaven Agreements

USCF is party to an Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement, dated Julyas of May 1, 2011,2018, as amended from time to time, with SummerHaven, whereby SummerHaven provides advisory services to USCF with respect to the Applicable Index for each Trust Series and investment decisions for each Trust Series. SummerHaven’s advisory services include, but are not limited to, general consultation regarding the calculation and maintenance of the Applicable Index for each Trust Series anticipated changes to each Applicable Index and the nature of each Applicable Index’s current or anticipated component securities.investments. For these services, USCF pays SummerHaven a fee based on a percentage of the average total net assets of each Trust Series. For USCI,USCF pays SummerHaven an annual fee of $15,000 per each Trust Series as well as an annual fee of 0.06% of the fee is equal to the percentage fees paid to USCF minus 0.14%, with that result multiplied by 0.5, minus 0.06% to arrive at the actual fee paid. Foraverage daily total net assets of each of CPER and USAG, the fee is equal to the percentage fees paid to USCF minus 0.18%, with that result multiplied by 0.5, minus 0.6% to arrive at the actual fee paid.

Trust Series.

USCF is also party to an Amended and Restated Licensing Agreement, dated Julyas of May 1, 2011,2018, as amended by that certain Amendment to Amended and Restated Licensing Agreement dated as of September 15, 2020, and as further amended from time to time, with SummerHaven whereby SummerHaven sub-licensedand SHIM, pursuant to each Trust Serieswhich SHIM grants a license to USCF for the use of certain names and marks, including the Applicable Index for each Trust Series in exchange for whicha fee to be paid by USCF to SHIM. USCF pays licensing fees to SummerHaven has a sub-license from SHIM, the owner of each Applicable Index. Under the Licensing Agreement, USCF paid SummerHavenequal to an annual fee of $15,000 per each Trust Series, for the year ended December 31, 2017, plus an annual fee of 0.06% of the average daily total net assets of each Trust Series.

As a result of the amendment and restatement of the Licensing Agreement and Advisory Agreement in May of 2018, the fees required to be paid by USCF to SummerHaven and SHIM in the aggregate have not changed from the aggregate fees paid by USCF under the two agreements prior to the amendment and restatement.

NOTE 6 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISKS AND CONTINGENCIES

Each Trust Series engages in the trading of futures contracts, options on futures contracts, cleared swaps and OTC swaps(collectively,swaps (collectively, “derivatives”). As such, each Trust Series is exposed to both market risk, which is the risk arising from changes in the market value of the contracts, and credit risk, which is the risk of failure by another party to perform according to the terms of a contract.

Each Trust Series may enter into futures contracts, options on futures contracts and cleared swaps to gain exposure to changes in the value of an underlying commodity. A futures contract obligates the seller to deliver (and the purchaser to accept) the future delivery of a specified quantity and type of a commodity at a specified time and place. Some futures contracts may call for physical delivery of the asset, while others are settled in cash. The contractual obligations of a buyer or seller may generally be satisfied by taking or making physical delivery of the underlying commodity or by making an offsetting sale or purchase of an identical futures contract on the same or linked exchange before the designated date of delivery. Cleared swaps are agreements that are eligible to be cleared by a clearinghouse, e.g., ICE Clear Europe, and provide the efficiencies and benefits that centralized clearing on an exchange offers to traders of futures contracts, including credit risk intermediation and the ability to offset positions initiated with different counterparties.

119

The purchase and sale of futures contracts, options on futures contracts and cleared swaps require margin deposits with an FCM. Additional deposits may be necessary for any loss on contract value. The Commodity Exchange Act requires an FCM to segregate all customer transactions and assets from the FCM’s proprietary activities.

transactions and assets.

Futures contracts, options on futures contracts and cleared swaps involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (specifically commodity price risk) and exposure to loss in excess of the amount of variation margin. The face or contract amounts reflect the extent of the total exposure each Trust Series has in the particular classes of instruments. Additional risks associated with the use of futures contracts are an imperfect correlation between movements in the price of the futures contracts and the market value of the underlying securities and the possibility of an illiquid market for a futures contract. Buying and selling options on futures contracts exposes investors to the risks of purchasing or selling futures contracts.

All of the Futures Contractsfutures contracts held by each Trust Series through December 31, 20172023 were exchange-traded. The risks associated with exchange-traded contracts are generally perceived to be less than those associated with OTC swaps since, in OTC swaps, a party must rely solely on the credit of its respective individual counterparties. However, in the future, if each Trust Series were to enter into non-exchange traded contracts (including Exchange for Related Position or EFRP), it would be subject to the credit risk associated with counterparty non-performance. The credit risk from counterparty non-performance associated with such instruments is the net unrealized gain, if any, on the transaction. Currently, each Trust Series has credit risk under its futures contracts since the sole counterparty to all domestic and foreign futures contracts is the clearinghouse for the exchange on which the relevant contracts are traded. In addition, each Trust Series bears the risk of financial failure by the clearing broker.

Significant market volatility has recently occurred in the commodity markets and the commodity futures markets. Such volatility is attributable in part to the COVID-19 pandemic, related supply chain disruptions, war, including the Russia-Ukraine war, attacks or

121

threats of attack by terrorists, conflicts in the Middle East, and continuing disputes among natural gas-producing countries. These and other events could cause continuing or increased volatility in the future, which may affect the value, pricing and liquidity of some investments or other assets, including those held by or invested in by a Trust Series and have a negative impact on such Trust Series or it ability to have all of its assets invested in the Benchmark Component Futures Contracts.

A Trust Series’ cash and other property, such as Treasuries, deposited with an FCM are considered commingled with all other customer funds, subject to the FCM’s segregation requirements. In the event of an FCM’s insolvency, recovery may be limited to a pro rata share of segregated funds available. It is possible that the recovered amount could be less than the total of cash and other property deposited. The insolvency of an FCM could result in the complete loss of a Trust Series’ assets posted with that FCM; however, the majority of each Trust Series’ assets are held in investments in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents with the Trust Series’ custodian and would not be impacted by the insolvency of an FCM. The failure or insolvency of the Trust Series’ custodian, however, could result in a substantial loss of each Trust Series’ assets.

USCF may invest a portion of each Trust Series’ cash in money market funds that seek to maintain a stable per share NAV. Each Trust Series may be exposed to any risk of loss associated with an investment in such money market funds. As of December 31, 2017,2023 and December 31, 2022, USCI CPER and USAG held investments in money market funds in the amounts of $9,000,000, $990,000$55,800,000 and $300,000,$233,050,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, none of the Trust Series2023 and December 31, 2022, CPER held investments in money market funds.funds in the amounts of $32,950,000 and $158,200,000, respectively. Each Trust Series also holds cash deposits with its custodian. Pursuant to a written agreement with BBH&Co., uninvested overnight cash balances are swept to offshore branches of U.S. regulated and domiciled banks located in Toronto, Canada, London, United Kingdom, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands and Nassau, Bahamas which are subject to U.S. regulation and regulatory oversight. As of December 31, 20172023 and December 31, 2016,2022, USCI held cash deposits and investments in Treasuries in the amounts of $488,389,644$116,309,309 and $641,316,546,$13,007,371, respectively, with the custodian and FCM.FCMs. As of December 31, 20172023 and December 31, 2016,2022, CPER held cash deposits and investments in Treasuries in the amounts of $9,107,982$94,151,194 and $5,640,820,$7,013,916, respectively, with the custodian and FCM. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, USAG held cash deposits and investments in Treasuries in the amounts of $1,453,032 and $1,989,821, respectively, with the custodian and FCM.FCMs. Some or all of these amounts may be subject to loss should the Trust Series’ custodian and/or FCMFCMs cease operations.

For derivatives, risks arise from changes in the market value of the contracts. Theoretically, each Trust Series is exposed to market risk equal to the value of Futures Contracts purchased and unlimited liability on such contracts sold short. As both a buyer and a seller of options, each Trust Series pays or receives a premium at the outset and then bears the risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the contract underlying the option.

The Trust Series’ policy is to continuously monitor its exposure to market and counterparty risk through the use of a variety of financial, position and credit exposure reporting controls and procedures. In addition, the Trust Series or USCF have a policy of requiring review of the credit standing of each broker or counterparty with which they conduct business.

The financial instruments held by the applicable Trust Series are reported in its statements of financial condition at market or fair value, or at carrying amounts that approximate fair value, because of their highly liquid nature and short-term maturity.

122

NOTE 7 - FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following tables presenttable presents per share performance data and other supplemental financial data for each Trust Series for the years ended December 31,  2017, 20162023, 2022 and 20152021 for the shareholders. This information has been derived from information presented in the financial statements.

USCI

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

 

December 31, 

December 31, 

December 31, 

2023

2022

2021

 

Per Share Operating Performance:

Net asset value, beginning of year

 

$

56.23

$

43.43

$

32.58

Total income (loss)

0.73

13.39

11.25

Total expenses

(0.62)

(0.59)

(0.40)

Net increase (decrease) in net asset value

0.11

#

12.80

10.85

Net asset value, end of year

 

$

56.34

$

56.23

$

43.43

Total Return

0.20

%

29.47

%

33.30

%

Ratios to Average Net Assets

Total income (loss)

(0.47)

%

22.65

%

26.58

%

Management fees

0.80

%*

0.80

%*

0.80

%*

Total expenses excluding management fees

0.31

%

0.28

%

0.21

%

Net income (loss)

(1.58)

%

21.57

%

25.57

%

#

120

USCI

  Year ended
December 31, 2017
  Year ended
December 31, 2016
  Year ended
December 31, 2015
 
Per Share Operating Performance:            
Net asset value, beginning of year $40.02  $40.52  $48.24 
Total income (loss)  2.87   (0.07)  (7.23)
Net expenses  (0.41)  (0.43)  (0.49)
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value  2.46   (0.50)  (7.72)
Net asset value, end of year $42.48  $40.02  $40.52 
Total Return  6.15%  (1.23)%  (16.00)%
Ratios to Average Net Assets            
Total income (loss)  6.17%  (1.57)%  (17.26)%
Management fees  0.80%*  0.80%*  0.80%**
Total expenses excluding management fees  0.24%  0.23%  0.31%
Expenses waived  %*  %*  %**
Net expenses excluding management fees  0.24%  0.23%  0.31%
Net income (loss)  5.14%  (2.60)%  (18.38)%

*Effective January 1, 2016, USCF permanently lowered

The amount shown for a share outstanding throughout the management feeyear may not agree with the change in the aggregate gains and losses for the year because of the timing of sales and repurchases of the Fund's shares in relation to 0.80% (80 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assetsfluctuating market values for USCI.

**From May 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015, USCF contractually lowered the management fee to 0.80% per annum of average daily total net assets for USCI.Fund.

CPER

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

    

Year ended

 

December 31, 

December 31, 

December 31, 

2023

2022

2021

 

Per Share Operating Performance:

Net asset value, beginning of year

 

$

23.07

$

27.24

$

21.72

Total income (loss)

1.28

(3.93)

5.74

Total expenses

(0.25)

(0.24)

(0.22)

Net increase (decrease) in net asset value

1.03

(4.17)

5.52

Net asset value, end of year

 

$

24.10

$

23.07

$

27.24

Total Return

4.46

%

(15.31)

%

25.41

%

Ratios to Average Net Assets

Total income (loss)

5.92

%

(17.40)

%

9.82

%

Management fees

0.65

%

0.65

%

0.65

%

Total expenses excluding management fees

0.39

%

0.32

%

0.23

%

Expense waived

%

%

(0.03)

%

Net expense excluding management fees

0.39

%

0.32

%

0.20

%

Net income (loss)

4.88

%

(18.37)

%

8.97

%

  Year ended
December 31, 2017
  Year ended
December 31, 2016
  Year ended
December 31, 2015
 
Per Share Operating Performance:            
Net asset value, beginning of year $16.36  $14.24  $19.10 
Total income (loss)  4.83   2.24   (4.73)
Net expenses  (0.14)  (0.12)  (0.13)
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value  4.69   2.12   (4.86)
Net asset value, end of year $21.05  $16.36  $14.24 
Total Return  28.67%  14.89%  (25.45)%
Ratios to Average Net Assets            
Total income (loss)  22.70%  8.84%  (31.59)%
Management fees  0.65%*  0.65%*  0.65%**
Total expenses excluding management fees  0.54%  2.71%  3.19%†
Expenses waived  (0.39)%*†  (2.56)%*†  (3.04)%**†
Net expenses excluding management fees  0.15%  0.15%  0.15%†
Net income (loss)  21.90%  8.04%  (32.39)%

*Effective January 1, 2016, USCF permanently lowered the management fee to 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for CPER.
**From May 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015, USCF contractually lowered the management fee to 0.65% per annum of average daily total net assets for CPER.
USCF paid certain expenses on a discretionary basis typically borne by CPER where expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of CPER’s NAV, on an annualized basis. USCF has no obligation to continue such payments into subsequent periods.

121

USAG

  Year ended
December 31, 2017
  Year ended
December 31, 2016
  Year ended
December 31, 2015
 
Per Share Operating Performance:            
Net asset value, beginning of year $19.01  $19.80  $22.97 
Total income (loss)  (1.35)  (0.63)  (3.00)
Net expenses  (0.15)  (0.16)  (0.17)
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value  (1.50)  (0.79)  (3.17)
Net asset value, end of year $17.51  $19.01  $19.80 
Total Return  (7.89)%  (3.99)%  (13.80)%
Ratios to Average Net Assets            
Total income (loss)  (7.30)%  (3.17)%  (14.36)%
Management fees  0.65%*  0.65%*  0.65%**
Total expenses excluding management fees  2.62%  3.79%  2.84%†
Expenses waived  (2.47)%*†  (3.64)%*†  (2.69)%**†
Net expenses excluding management fees  0.15%  0.15%  0.15%†
Net income (loss)  (8.10)%  (3.97)%  (15.16)%

*Effective January 1, 2016, USCF permanently lowered the management fee to 0.65% (65 basis points) per annum of average daily total net assets for USAG.
**From May 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015, USCF contractually lowered the management fee to 0.65% per annum of average daily total net assets for USAG.
USCF paid certain expenses on a discretionary basis typically borne by USAG where expenses exceeded 0.15% (15 basis points) of USAG’s NAV, on an annualized basis. USCF has no obligation to continue such payments into subsequent periods.

Total returns are calculated based on the change in value during the period. An individual shareholder’s total return and ratio may vary from the above total returns and ratios based on the timing of contributions to and withdrawals from each Trust Series. Additionally, only Authorized Participants purchase and redeem shares from each Trust Series at the NAV per share. Most shareholders will

123

purchase and sell shares in the secondary market at market prices, which may differ from the NAV per share and result in a higher or lower total return.

NOTE 8 – QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)

The following summarized (unaudited) quarterly financial information presents the results of operations and other data for the three-month periods ended March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 20172023 and 2016.

2022.

USCI

 First Quarter
2017
  Second Quarter
2017
  Third Quarter
2017
  Fourth Quarter
2017
 

    

First

    

Second

    

Third

    

Fourth

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

2023

2023

2023

2023

Total Income (Loss) $(9,365,854) $(9,718,956) $21,340,388  $29,585,153 

$

(8,310,360)

$

(1,854,670)

$

17,560,299

$

(8,310,043)

Total Expenses  1,431,730   1,424,635   1,186,116   1,307,330 

 

626,477

 

497,872

 

517,215

 

537,635

Net Income (Loss) $(10,797,584) $(11,143,591) $20,154,272  $28,277,823 

$

(8,936,837)

$

(2,352,542)

$

17,043,084

$

(8,847,678)

Net Income (Loss) per Share $(0.81) $(0.75) $1.62  $2.40 

$

(1.95)

$

(0.64)

$

5.48

$

(2.78)

 First Quarter
2016
  Second Quarter
2016
  Third Quarter
2016
  Fourth Quarter
2016
 

    

First

    

Second

    

Third

    

Fourth

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

2022

2022

2022

2022

Total Income (Loss) $(731,412) $37,071,255  $(23,532,292) $(22,231,704)

$

65,920,524

$

(2,222,314)

$

(19,228,766)

$

24,505,133

Total Expenses  1,348,751   1,451,019   1,774,652   1,641,076 

 

686,919

 

946,715

 

880,271

 

769,393

Net Income (Loss) $(2,080,163) $35,620,236  $(25,306,944) $(23,872,780)

$

65,233,605

$

(3,169,029)

$

(20,109,037)

$

23,735,740

Net Income (Loss) per Share $(0.11) $2.66  $(1.57) $(1.48)

$

11.76

$

(0.28)

$

(3.46)

$

4.78

CPER

 First Quarter
2017
  Second Quarter
2017
  Third Quarter
2017
  Fourth Quarter
2017
 

    

First

    

Second

    

Third

    

Fourth

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

2023

2023

2023

2023

Total Income (Loss) $392,246  $114,427  $830,774  $1,009,945 

$

14,293,505

$

(10,888,325)

$

(432,010)

$

5,411,390

Total Expenses  36,305   34,700   29,845   22,102 

 

395,626

 

356,803

 

378,678

 

337,171

Expense waivers  (17,779)  (7,307)  (10,493)  (4,574)
Net expenses  18,526   27,393   19,352   17,528 
Net Income (Loss) $373,720  $87,034  $811,422  $992,417 

13,897,879

(11,245,128)

(810,688)

5,074,219

Net Income (Loss) per Share $0.95  $0.19  $1.47  $2.08 

$

1.97

$

(1.88)

$

(0.05)

$

0.99

122

    

First

    

Second

    

Third

    

Fourth

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

2022

2022

2022

2022

Total Income (Loss)

$

13,989,842

$

(54,315,842)

$

(12,686,525)

$

19,590,559

Total Expenses

 

488,722

 

559,756

 

456,016

 

354,953

Net Income (Loss)

13,501,120

(54,875,598)

(13,142,541)

19,235,606

Net Income (Loss) per Share

$

1.66

$

(6.48)

$

(1.87)

$

2.52

  First Quarter
2016
  Second Quarter
2016
  Third Quarter
2016
  Fourth Quarter
2016
 
Total Income (Loss) $14,977  $3,652  $9,405  $232,591 
Total Expenses  20,562   23,415   27,792   27,464 
Expense waivers  (16,334)  (17,699)  (22,051)  (19,556)
Net expenses  4,228   5,716   5,741   7,908 
Net Income (Loss) $10,749  $(2,064) $3,664  $224,683 
Net Income (Loss) per Share $0.29  $(0.01) $0.02  $1.82 

USAG

  First Quarter
2017
  Second Quarter
2017
  Third Quarter
2017
  Fourth Quarter
2017
 
Total Income (Loss) $(10,243) $(13,891) $(113,661) $2,843 
Total Expenses  22,497   7,643   17,981   12,232 
Expense waivers  (18,575)  (3,979)  (14,271)  (8,708)
Net expenses  3,922   3,664   3,710   3,524 
Net Income (Loss) $(14,165) $(17,555) $(117,371) $(681)
Net Income (Loss) per Share $(0.14) $(0.18) $(1.17) $(0.01)

  First Quarter
2016
  Second Quarter
2016
  Third Quarter
2016
  Fourth Quarter
2016
 
Total Income (Loss) $(11,112) $172,101  $(204,613) $(19,251)
Total Expenses  18,802   20,729   25,510   23,022 
Expense waivers  (14,946)  (16,612)  (21,453)  (19,162)
Net expenses  3,856   4,117   4,057   3,860 
Net Income (Loss) $(14,968) $167,984  $(208,670) $(23,111)
Net Income (Loss) per Share $(0.15) $1.68  $(2.09) $(0.23)

NOTE 9  FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Trust and each Trust Series value their investments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. The changes to past practice resulting from the application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between: (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Trust and each Trust Series (observable inputs) and (2) the Trust’s and each Trust Series’ own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available under the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The three levels defined by the ASC 820 hierarchy are as follows:

Level I – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identicalidenticalassets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

124

Level II – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level I that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level II assets include the following: quoted prices for similarsimilarassets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market-corroborated inputs).

Level III – Unobservable pricing input at the measurement date for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.

In some instances, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest input level that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

The following table summarizes the valuation of USCI’s securities at December 31, 2023 using the fair value hierarchy:

123

At December 31, 2023

    

Total

    

Level I

    

Level II

    

Level III

Short-Term Investments

$

98,508,636

$

98,508,636

$

$

Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts

 

United States Contracts

(3,158,862)

(3,158,862)

Foreign Contracts

 

(146,218)

(146,218)

The following table summarizes the valuation of USCI’s securities at December 31, 20172022 using the fair value hierarchy:

At December 31, 2017 Total  Level I  Level II  Level III 

At December 31, 2022

    

Total

    

Level I

    

Level II

    

Level III

Short-Term Investments $441,986,578  $441,986,578  $  $ 

$

233,050,000

$

233,050,000

$

$

Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts                

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

United States Contracts

 

6,744,521

 

6,744,521

 

 

Foreign Contracts  1,609,317   1,609,317       

 

2,654,209

 

2,654,209

 

 

United States Contracts  5,263,653   5,263,653       

During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.

The following table summarizes the valuation of USCI’s securities at December 31, 2016 using the fair value hierarchy:

At December 31, 2016 Total  Level I  Level II  Level III 
Short-Term Investments $514,192,445  $514,192,445  $  $ 
Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts                
Foreign Contracts  (3,366,242)  (3,366,242)      
United States Contracts  5,421,702   5,421,702       

During the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.

The following table summarizes the valuation of CPER’s securities at December 31, 20172023 using the fair value hierarchy:

At December 31, 2017 Total  Level I  Level II  Level III 

At December 31, 2023

    

Total

    

Level I

    

Level II

    

Level III

Short-Term Investments $9,590,067  $9,590,067  $  $ 

$

53,758,687

$

53,758,687

$

$

Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts                

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

United States Contracts  881,938   881,938       

 

3,996,334

 

3,996,334

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.

The following table summarizes the valuation of CPER’s securities at December 31, 20162022 using the fair value hierarchy:

At December 31, 2016 Total  Level I  Level II  Level III 

At December 31, 2022

    

Total

    

Level I

    

Level II

    

Level III

Short-Term Investments $4,541,320  $4,541,320  $  $ 

$

158,200,000

$

158,200,000

$

$

Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts                

 

United States Contracts  88,575   88,575       

3,972,853

3,972,853

During the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.

The following table summarizes the valuation of USAG’s securities at December 31, 2017 using the fair value hierarchy:

At December 31, 2017 Total  Level I  Level II  Level III 
Short-Term Investments $1,643,759  $1,643,759  $  $ 
Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts                
Foreign Contracts  (1,314)  (1,314)      
United States Contracts  189   189       

During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.

The following table summarizes the valuation of USAG’s securities at December 31, 2016 using the fair value hierarchy:

At December 31, 2016 Total  Level I  Level II  Level III 
Short-Term Investments $1,397,843  $1,397,843  $  $ 
Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts                
Foreign Contracts  (90,442)  (90,442)      
United States Contracts  742   742       

During the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no transfers between Level I and Level II.

124

The Trust and each Trust Series have adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 815 — Derivatives and Hedging, which require presentation of qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts and gains and losses on derivatives.

125

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments Held by USCI

Statements of 

Financial

Condition

Fair Value at

Fair Value at

Derivatives not Accounted for as Hedging Instruments

    

Location

    

December 31, 2023

    

December 31, 2022

Futures - Commodity Contracts

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts

 

$

(3,305,080)

$

9,398,730

Derivatives not Accounted for as
Hedging Instruments
 Statements of
Financial Condition
Location
 Fair Value At
December 31, 2017
  Fair Value At
December  31, 2016
 
Futures - Commodity Contracts Assets $6,872,970  $2,055,460 
           

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments Held by CPER

Statements of 

Financial

Condition

Fair Value at

Fair Value at

Derivatives not Accounted for as Hedging Instruments

    

Location

    

December 31, 2023

    

December 31, 2022

Futures - Commodity Contracts

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts

 

$

3,996,334

$

3,972,853

Derivatives not Accounted for as
Hedging Instruments
 Statements of
Financial Condition
Location
 Fair Value At
December 31, 2017
  Fair Value At
December  31, 2016
 
Futures - Commodity Contracts Assets $881,938  $88,575 
           

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments Held by USAG

Derivatives not Accounted for as
Hedging Instruments
 Statements of
Financial Condition
Location
 Fair Value At
December  31, 2017
  Fair Value At
December 31, 2016
 
Futures - Commodity Contracts Assets $(1,125) $(89,700)
           

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statements of Operations of USCI

    

For the year ended

For the year ended

    

For the year ended

December 31, 2023

December 31, 2022

December 31, 2021

Change in

Change in

Change in

Location of

Realized Gain

Unrealized Gain

Realized Gain

Unrealized Gain

Realized Gain

Unrealized Gain

Derivatives

Gain (Loss)

(Loss) on

(Loss) on

(Loss) in

(Loss) on

(Loss) in

(Loss) on

not

on

Derivatives

Derivatives

Derivatives

Derivatives

Derivatives

Derivatives

Accounted for as

Derivatives

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Hedging Instruments

    

Recognized in Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

Futures - Commodity Contracts

 

Realized gain (loss) on closed commodity futures contracts

$

2,123,019

$

59,921,738

$

58,239,578

 

 

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts

$

(12,703,810)

$

4,552,856

$

(2,447,470)

    For the year ended
December 31, 2017
  For the year ended
December 31, 2016
  For the year ended
December 31, 2015
 
Derivatives
not Accounted
for as
Hedging
Instruments
 Location of
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
 Realized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Change in
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Realized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Change in
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Realized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Change in
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
 
                     
Futures - Commodity Contracts Realized gain (loss) on closed positions $22,989,718      $(22,063,913)     $(127,566,722)    
  Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open positions     $4,817,510      $10,637,687      $29,684,932 

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statements of Operations of CPER

    

    

For the year ended

    

For the year ended

    

For the year ended

December 31, 2023

December 31, 2022

December 31, 2021

Change in

Change in

Change in

Derivatives

Location of

Realized

Unrealized

Realized

Unrealized

Realized

Unrealized

not Accounted

Gain (Loss)

Gain (Loss)

Gain (Loss) on

Gain (Loss)

Gain (Loss) on

Gain (Loss)

Gain (Loss) on

for as

on Derivatives

on Derivatives

Derivatives

in Derivatives

Derivatives

in Derivatives

Derivatives

Hedging

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Instruments

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

Futures - Commodity Contracts

 

Realized gain (loss) on closed commodity futures contracts

$

1,358,100

$

(32,719,288)

$

20,590,837

 

  

 

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on commodity futures contracts positions

$

23,481

$

(3,280,075)

$

2,956,865

    For the year ended
December 31, 2017
  For the year ended
December 31, 2016
  For the year ended
December 31, 2015
 
Derivatives
not Accounted
for as
Hedging
Instruments
 Location of
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
 Realized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Change in
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Realized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Change in
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Realized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Change in
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
 
                     
Futures - Commodity Contracts Realized gain (loss) on closed positions $1,468,825      $(19,600)     $(639,262)    
  Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open positions     $793,363      $269,200      $16,900 

125

126

The EffectTable of Derivative Instruments on the Statements of Operations of USAGContents

    For the year ended
December 31, 2017
  For the year ended
December 31, 2016
  For the year ended
December 31, 2015
 
Derivatives
not Accounted
for as
Hedging
Instruments
 Location of
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
 Realized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Change in
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Realized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Change in
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Realized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
  Change in
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on
Derivatives
Recognized
in Income
 
                     
Futures - Commodity Contracts Realized gain (loss) on closed positions $(238,006)     $26,386      $(373,442)    
  Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open positions     $88,575      $(95,857)     $72,733 

NOTE 10 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In August 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, modifying ASU 2014-09.  The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  ASU 2015-14 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods.  Early application is permitted.  At this time, management does not believe there will be any impact to the Fund’s financial statements.

NOTE 1110 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Trust and each Trust Series have performed an evaluation of subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued. This evaluation did not result in any subsequent events that necessitated disclosures and/or adjustments.

126

United States Commodity Funds LLC

____________

Contents

Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF - 2
Statements of Financial ConditionF - 3
Notes to Statements of Financial ConditionF - 4


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Member of
United States Commodity Funds LLC

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of United States Commodity Funds LLC (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related notes to these financial statements (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ BPM LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.

San Francisco, California

February 28, 2018

F-2 

United States Commodity Funds LLC127

StatementsTable of Financial Condition

December 31, 2017 and 2016

  2017  2016 
ASSETS        
         
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $4,071,378  $5,941,128 
Short-term investments  184,322   1,041 
Management fees receivable - related party  1,596,581   2,199,866 
Prepaid income taxes  -   931,556 
Other current assets  157,321   100,526 
         
Total current assets  6,009,602   9,174,117 
         
Deferred tax assets, net  752,180   1,085,720 
Other assets  8,558   8,558 
         
Total assets $6,770,340  $10,268,395 
         
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER'S EQUITY        
         
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $1,368,406  $1,695,149 
Dividend payable - related party  -   2,000,000 
Expense waivers payable - related party  866,316   939,385 
         
Total current liabilities  2,234,722   4,634,534 
         
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)        
         
Member's equity  4,535,618   5,633,861 
         
Total liabilities and member's equity $6,770,340  $10,268,395 

F-3Contents

United States Commodity Funds LLC
Notes to the Financial Statements

1.Business

In May 2005, United States Commodity Funds, LLC (“USCF” or the “Company”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wainwright Holdings Inc. (“Wainwright”), was formed as a single member limited liability company in the State of Delaware. On December 9, 2016, Wainwright was acquired by Concierge Technologies, Inc., (“Concierge” or “CNCG”), a public company currently traded on the OTC Markets QB Exchange with majority ownership held by two shareholders who also are majority owners of Wainwright. CNCG will continue to operate USCF as an independent wholly-owned subsidiary of Wainwright. USCF will also maintain its current independent and management director structure. USCF is a registered commodity pool operator with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”) and serves as the General Partner (“General Partner”) for various limited partnerships (“LP”) as noted below.

The Company’s operating activities consist primarily of providing management services to thirteen active public funds.

The Company is currently the General Partner in the following Securities Act of 1933 LP commodity based index funds, and a Sponsor (“Sponsor”) for the fund series within the United States Commodity Index Funds Trust (“USCIF Trust”) and USCF Funds Trust:

USCF as General Partner for the following Funds:
United States Oil Fund, LP (“USO”)Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in May 2005
United States Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNG”)Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in November 2006
United States Gasoline Fund, LP (“UGA”)Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in April 2007
United States Diesel Heating Oil Fund, LP (“UHN”)Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in April 2007
United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (“USL”)Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in June 2007
United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNL”)Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in June 2007
United States Short Oil Fund, LP (“DNO”)Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in June 2008
United States Brent Oil Fund, LP (“BNO”)Organized as a Delaware limited partnership in September 2009
USCF as fund Sponsor - each a series within the USCIF Trust:
United States Commodity Index Funds Trust (“USCIF Trust”)A series trust formed in Delaware December 2009
United States Commodity Index Fund (“USCI”)A commodity pool made public August 2010
United States Copper Index Fund (“CPER”)A commodity pool made public November 2011
United States Agriculture Index Fund (“USAG”)A commodity pool made public April 2012
USCF Canadian Crude Oil Index Fund (“UCCO”)Currently in registration and has not commenced operations
USCF as fund Sponsor - each a series within the USCF Funds Trust:
USCF Funds TrustA series trust formed in Delaware March 2016
United States 3x Oil Fund (“USOU”)A commodity pool made public July 2017
United States 3x Short Oil Fund (“USOD”)A commodity pool made public July 2017

In addition, USCF is the sponsor of the USCF Funds Trust, a Delaware statutory trust, and each of its series, the REX S&P MLP Fund (“RMLP”) and the REX S&P MLP Inverse Fund (“MLPD”), which are currently in registration and have not commenced operations (together, the “REX Funds”). All USCF funds are collectively referred to as the “Funds” hereafter.

F-4

United States Commodity Funds LLC
Notes to the Financial Statements

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The accompanying statements of financial condition of the Company have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition — Related Parties

The Company recognizes revenue under the Funds’ respective Limited Partnership Agreements, as amended from time to time (the “Limited Partnership Agreements”) and the Trust Agreement, as amended from time to time (the “Trust Agreement”). These Agreements provide for fees based upon a percentage of the daily average net asset value of the Funds. The Company is responsible for investing the assets of the Funds in accordance with the objectives and policies of the respective Funds. In addition, the Company has arranged for one or more third parties to provide administrative, custody, accounting, transfer agency and other necessary services to the Funds and is contractually obligated to pay for these services. The Funds are contractually obligated to pay the Company a management fee, which is paid monthly, based on the average daily net assets of the Funds.

USO pays a management fee of 0.45% (45 basis points) per annum on its average daily net assets. UNG pays a fee equal to 0.60% (60 basis points) per annum on average daily net assets of $1,000,000,000 or less and 0.50% (50 basis points) of average daily net assets that are greater than $1,000,000,000. USL, UGA, UHN, and DNO each pay a fee of 0.60% (60 basis points) per annum on their average daily net assets. From inception through April 30, 2010, the Company has been charging UNL a management fee at a reduced rate of 0.60% (60 basis points) per annum of average daily net assets. Effective May 1, 2010, the Company resumed charging UNL its standard rate of 0.75% (75 basis points) per annum of average daily net assets. The difference of 0.15% (15 basis points) per annum of average daily net assets since inception through April 30, 2010 has been waived by the Company and will not be recouped from UNL. BNO pays a management fee of 0.75% (75 basis points) per annum on its average daily net assets. USOU and USOD each pay a management fee of 0.95% (95 basis points) per annum on its average daily net assets.

Effective January 1, 2014 and continuing through December 31, 2015, the Company contractually agreed to lower the management fee for USCI to 0.80% (80 basis points), 0.65% (65 basis points) for CPER and 0.65% (65 basis points) for USAG, per annum on its average daily net assets. Effective January 1, 2016, the Company permanently lowered the management fee to 0.80% (80 basis points) for USCI, 0.65% (65 basis points) for CPER and 0.65% (65 basis points) for USAG, per annum on its average daily net assets.

Management fees are recognized in the period earned in accordance with the terms of their respective agreements.

F-5

United States Commodity Funds LLC
Notes to the Financial Statements

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

Expense Waivers

The Company has voluntarily agreed to pay certain expenses normally borne by UGA, UHN, DNO, UNL, BNO, CPER and USAG to the extent such expenses exceed 0.15% (15 basis points) of the respective fund’s average daily net assets, on an annualized basis. The Company has no obligation to continue such payments into subsequent periods. These expenses totaled $866,316 and $939,385 for the years ended December 31,2017and2016, respectively, and are included in general and administrative expense. Expense waivers payable totaled $866,316 and $939,385 as of December 31,2017and2016, respectively.

Fund Startup Expenses

The Company expenses all startup expenses associated with the registration of each fund and the expense is charged to general and administrative expense. Fund startup expenses include costs relating to the initial registration of shares and include, but are not limited to, legal fees pertaining to the initial registration of shares, SEC and FINRA registration fees, initial fees to be listed on an exchange, and other similar costs.

The Funds pay for all brokerage fees, taxes and other expenses, including registration or other fees paid to the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) formerly the National Association of Securities Dealers, or any other regulatory agency in connection with the offer and sale of subsequent shares after their initial registration and all legal, accounting, printing and other expenses associated therewith.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company places its cash with various high credit quality institutions. At times, the Company maintains cash deposits in excess of the United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation coverage of $250,000, but the Company does not expect any losses.

Management Fees Receivable – Related Party

Management fees receivable generally consist of one month of management fees which are collected in the month after they are earned. The Company is the general partner or fund sponsor of various funds for which we earn a management fee.

Management closely monitors receivables and records an allowance for any balances that are determined to be uncollectible. As of December 31,2017and2016, the Company considered all remaining accounts receivable to be fully collectible.

Investments

Management determines the appropriate classification of investments at the time of purchase based upon management’s intent with respect to such investments. Short-term investments consist of equities, futures, and money market funds. Short-term investments are classified as available-for-sale securities. The Company measures the investments at estimated fair value at period end with any changes in estimated fair value reflected as unrealized gains (losses) in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

F-6

United States Commodity Funds LLC
Notes to the Financial Statements

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

Fair Value Measurements

The Company’s short-term investments are carried at estimated fair value. In determining fair value, the Company follows the guidance of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820,Fair Value Measurement(“ASC 820”). Under ASC 820, the fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities, without adjustment.

Level 2 – Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active for identical or similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in active markets of similar assets or liabilities, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 – Pricing inputs are unobservable and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment.

Unrealized gains and losses on investments resulting from market fluctuations are recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) account. Realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined on a specific identification basis.

Short-term investments are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded.

Income Taxes

The Company has filed an election with the Internal Revenue Service to be treated as an association taxable as a corporation. The Company files a federal consolidated income tax return with entities not included on these financials. In connection with filing a consolidated federal income tax return, the tax benefit of utilizing tax losses generated by the consolidated group is not reflected on USCF’s statements of financial condition. The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, valuation of net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards, if any.

F-7

United States Commodity Funds LLC
Notes to the Financial Statements

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

Income Taxes, continued

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. If necessary, a valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets until it is more likely than not that such assets will be realized.

The Company provides for uncertain tax positions using guidance which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized upon the adoption of the accounting standard and in subsequent periods. In addition, the accounting standard provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.

On December 22, 2017, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) was enacted into law with new legislation containing several key tax provisions which affects the Company including a reduction of the corporate income tax rate to 21% from 34%, effective January 1, 2018, among others. The Company is required to recognize the effect of the tax law changes in the period of enactment, such as re-measuring its U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities as well as reassessing the net realizability of its deferred tax assets and liabilities. 

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentrations of management fees receivable as of December 31,2017and2016 are as follows:

  December 31, 2017 
Fund Management Fees Receivable 
       
USO $799,623   50%
USCI  326,005   20%
UNG  312,466   20%
All Others  158,487   10%
         
Total $1,596,581   100%

  December 31, 2016 
Fund Management Fees Receivable 
       
USO $1,256,213   57%
USCI  445,163   20%
UNG  303,354   14%
All Others  195,136   9%
         
Total $2,199,866   100%

F-8

United States Commodity Funds LLC
Notes to the Financial Statements

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, continued

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02,Leases. In September 2017 the FASB issued ASU 2017-13,Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and Leases (Topic 842):Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to the Staff Announcement at the July 20, 2017 EITF Meeting and Rescission of Prior SEC Staff Announcements and Observer Comments, which further elaborates on the original ASU No. 2016-02. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for public business entities with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods.All other entities are required to adopt ASC Topic 842 for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of the new standard.

No other recently issued accounting pronouncements are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

3.Investments and Fair Value Measurements

Investments measured at estimated fair value consist of the following as of December 31,2017and2016:

  December 31, 2017 
     Gross  Gross    
     Unrealized  Unrealized  Estimated 
  Cost  Gains  (Losses)  Fair Value 
             
Money market funds $96  $-  $-  $96 
Futures  395,000   -   (211,912)  183,088 
Equities  1,577   -   (439)  1,138 
                 
Total short-term investments $396,673  $-  $(212,351) $184,322 

  December 31, 2016 
     Gross  Gross    
     Unrealized  Unrealized  Estimated 
  Cost  Gains  Losses  Fair Value 
             
Money market funds $96  $-  $-  $96 
Equities  1,577   -   (632)  945 
                 
Total short-term investments $1,673  $-  $(632) $1,041 

As of December 31,2017and2016, the Company did not have any investments with gross unrealized losses greater than 12 months on a continuous basis.

F-9

United States Commodity Funds LLC
Notes to the Financial Statements

3.Investments and Fair Value Measurements,continued

The following tables summarize the valuation of the Company’s securities at December 31, 2017 and 2016 using the fair value hierarchy:

  December 31, 2017 
  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Money market funds $96  $96  $-  $- 
Futures  183,088   -   183,088   - 
Other equities  1,138   1,138   -   - 
Total $184,322  $1,234  $183,088  $- 

  December 31, 2016 
  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Money market funds $96  $96  $-  $- 
Other equities  945   945   -   - 
Total $1,041  $1,041  $-  $- 

 During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2.

4.Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is included in member’s equity on the statements of financial condition. Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:

Balance, December 31, 2015 $(707)
     
  Other comprehensive income  75 
     
Balance, December 31, 2016 $(632)
     
  Other comprehensive (loss)  (211,719)
     
Balance, December 31, 2017 $(212,351)

5.Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

The Company leases office space in Oakland, California under an operating lease, which expires in October 2018.

Future minimum rental payments required under the operating lease, are as follows:

For the year ending December 31:   
2018 $113,304 
     
  $113,304 

Contingencies

From time to time, the Company is involved in legal proceedings arising mainly from the ordinary course of its business. In management’s opinion, the legal proceedings are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

F-10

United States Commodity Funds LLC
Notes to the Financial Statements

6.Income Taxes

The Company has filed an election with the Internal Revenue Service to be treated as an association taxable as a corporation. The Company files a federal consolidated income tax return with entities not included on these financials. In connection with filing a consolidated federal income tax return, the tax benefit of utilizing tax losses generated by the consolidated group is not reflected on USCF’s statements of financial condition. In connection with filing a consolidated federal income tax return, the Company has recorded federal income tax expense and deferred tax assets at the legal entity level as if it was filing its own stand-alone taxes.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

  2017  2016 
       
Deferred tax assets:        
Fund start-up costs $730,270  $1,041,325 
Capital loss carryover  12,334   6,969 
Accruals, reserves and other  21,910   44,395 
         
Gross deferred tax assets  764,514   1,092,689 
Less valuation allowance  (12,334)  (6,969)
         
Total deferred tax assets, net $752,180  $1,085,720 

The majority of the deferred tax assets relate to startup costs associated with the organization and registration of the Funds for which the Company is a general partner and having paid such costs.

On December 22, 2017, the TCJA (Tax Cut and Jobs Act) was enacted into law, which significantly changes existing U.S. tax law. The reduction of the U.S. federal statutory tax rate from 34% to 21% is effective January 1, 2018.

During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company remeasured the deferred taxes to reflect the reduced rate that will apply when these deferred taxes are settled or realized in future periods. This write down resulted in a decrease in the deferred tax asset and created tax expense that is recorded in the Statement of Operations. The reduction in the deferred tax asset was $403,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon future taxable income, if any, the amount and timing of which is uncertain. Based upon available objective evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable for capital loss carryover. Accordingly, management has established a valuation allowance related to this deferred tax asset. The valuation allowance increased by approximately $5,000 during 2017 and decreased $13,000 during 2016. The change in the valuation allowance is due to additional capital losses during the year.

The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. The Company’s tax years 2013 through 2017 will remain open for examination by the federal and state authorities for three and four years, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, there were no active taxing authority examinations.

The Company had unrecognized tax benefits (“UTBs”) of approximately $15,000 and $29,000 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company will recognize interest and penalties, when they occur, related to uncertain tax provisions as a component of tax expense. There is no interest or penalties to be recognized for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company does not expect its UTBs to change significantly over the next 12 months.

F-11

United States Commodity Funds LLC
Notes to the Financial Statements

7.Related Party Transactions

The Funds are deemed by management to be related parties. The Company’s revenues, totaling $21,045,593 and $25,425,892 for the years ended December 31,2017and2016, respectively, were earned from these related parties. Accounts receivable, totaling $1,596,581 and $2,199,866 as of December 31,2017and2016, respectively, were owed from these relate parties. Expense waivers, totaling $866,316 and $939,385 for the years ended December 31,2017and2016, respectively, were incurred on behalf of these related parties. Waivers payable, totaling $866,316 and $939,385 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were owed to these related parties.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company paid $6,600,000 and $2,100,000, respectively, in distributions to its member Wainwright.

The Company files a federal consolidated income tax return with entities not included on these financials. In connection with filing a consolidated federal income tax return, the tax benefit of utilizing tax losses generated by the consolidated group is not reflected on USCF’s statements of financial condition. The Company’s taxes are computed as if it files on a stand-alone basis (see Note 6).

8.Subsequent Events

The Company evaluated subsequent events for recognition and disclosure through February 28, 2018, the date the statements of financial condition were issued or filed. Nothing has occurred outside normal operations since that required recognition or disclosure in these statements of financial condition other than the items noted below.

On January 3, 2018, the Company approved a $1,000,000 dividend to Wainwright and was paid on January 18, 2018.


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Trust and each Trust Series maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Trust’s periodic reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) rules and forms.

The duly appointed officers of USCF, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, who perform functions equivalent to those of a principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Trust if the Trust had any officers, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Trust’s and each Trust Series’ disclosure controls and procedures and have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures of the Trust and each Trust Series have been effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Trust and each Trust Series are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Trust’s and each Trust Series’ internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to USCF and the Board of USCF regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. USCF’s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth above under the heading, “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” in Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Trust’s or any Trust Series’ internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trust’s or any Trust Series’ internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

No officers or directors of the Company have adopted, modified or terminated trading plans under either a Rule 10b5-1 or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as such terms are defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933) for the three-month period ended December 31, 2023.

Monthly Account Statements

Pursuant to the requirement under Rule 4.22 under the CEA, each month the Trust and each Trust Series publish account statements for the Trust Series’ shareholders, which include Statements of Income (Loss), Statements of Changes in Net Asset Value and Statements of Changes in Shares Outstanding. The account statements are furnished to the SEC on a current report on Form 8-K pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and posted each month on each Trust Series’ website at www.uscfinvestments.com.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.

Not applicable.

128

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Principals and Key Personnel of USCF. The Trust has no executive officers. Pursuant to the terms of the Trust Agreement, the Trust’s affairs are managed by USCF. The following principals of USCF serve in the below mentioned capacities:

Name
Age
Capacity
Nicholas D. Gerber

Name 

55

Age

Capacity

John P. Love

52

Management Director, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Vice President

Andrew F Ngim57Chief Operating Officer, Management Director and Portfolio Manager
Robert Nguyen58Management Director
John P. Love46President and Chief Executive Officer

Stuart P. Crumbaugh

54

60

Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

Carolyn M. Yu

Andrew F Ngim

59

63

General Counsel

Chief Operating Officer and Chief Compliance OfficerPortfolio Manager

Robert L. Nguyen

64

Management Director

Kathryn D. Rooney

51

Management Director, Chief Marketing Officer

Daphne G. Frydman

49

Director of Compliance

Ray W. Allen

61

67

Portfolio Manager

Kevin A. Baum

47

53

Chief Investment Officer Portfolio Manager

Gordon L. Ellis

71

77

Independent Director

Malcolm R. Fobes III

53

59

Independent Director

Peter M. Robinson

60

67

Independent Director

127

Ray W. Allen, 61,67, Portfolio Manager of USCF since January 2008. Mr. Allen was the portfolio manager of: (1) UGA from February 2008 until March 2010, and then portfolio manager since May 2015, (2) UHN from April 2008 until March 2010, and then portfolio manager sincefrom May 2015 to September 2018, (3) UNL from November 2009 until March 2010, and then portfolio manager since May 2015. In addition, he has been the portfolio manager of: (1) DNO sincefrom September 2009 to September 2018, (2) USO and USL since March 2010, (3) BNO since June 2010, (4) UNG since May 2015, (5) United States 3x Oil Fund and (4) USOUUnited States 3x Short Oil Fund from July 2017 to December 2019, and USOD since July 2017.(6) the USCF Commodity Strategy Fund, a series of USCF Mutual Funds Trust, from October 2017 to March 2019. Mr. Allen also has served as the portfolio manager of the USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund, a series of the USCF Mutual FundsETF Trust, from May 2018 to October 2021 and then portfolio manager since October 2017.January 2022. Mr. Allen has been a principal of USCF listed with the CFTC and NFA since March 2009 and has been registered as an associated person of USCF since July 2015 and from March 2008 to November 2012. Additionally, Mr. Allen has been approved as an NFA swaps associated person of USCF since July 2015. As of February 2017, he also is an associated person and swap associated person of USCF Advisers, LLC.LLC (“USCF Advisers”). USCF Advisers, LLC, an affiliate of USCF, is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and, as of February 2017, is registered as a commodity pool operator, NFA member and swap firm. Mr. Allen earned a B.A. in Economics from the University of California at Berkeley and holds an NFA Series 3 registration.

Kevin A. Baum, 47,53, has served as a Portfolio Manager of USCF since March 2016 and as the Chief Investment Officer of USCF since September 1, 2016.2016 and as a Portfolio Manager of USCF from March 2016 to April 2017. He also serves as the Chief Investment Officer of USCF Advisers since June 2021. Prior to joining USCF, Mr. Baum temporarily retired from December 2015 to March 2016. Mr. Baum served as the Vice President and Senior Portfolio Manager for Invesco, PowerShares Capital Management LLC, an investment manager that manages a family of exchange-traded funds, from October 2014 through December 2015. Mr. Baum was temporarily retired from May 2012 through September 2014. From May 1993 to April 2012, Mr. Baum worked as the Senior Portfolio Manager, Head of Commodities for OppenheimerFunds, Inc., a global asset manager. Mr. Baum has been approved with respect to USCF as an NFA member since March 2016 and a principal swap associated person, and associated person of USCF since April 2016, and as of January 2017, a branch manager of USCF. As of February 2017, heswap associated person since November 2020. He also is an associated person of USCF Advisers as of February 2017, and, as of June 2021, a principal and swap associated person and branch manager of USCF Advisers LLC.Advisers. USCF Advisers, LLC, an affiliate of USCF, is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and, as of February 2017, is registered as a commodity pool operator, NFA member and swap firm. Mr. Baum is a CFA Charterholder, CAIA Charterholder, and earned a B.B.A. in Finance from Texas Tech University.University and holds NFA Series 3 and FINRA Series 7 registration.

Stuart P. Crumbaugh, 60, 54,Management Director of USCF since April 2023 and Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of USCF since May 2015 and also2015. Also, Mr. Crumbaugh served as the Chief Financial Officer of The Marygold Companies, Inc., formerly Concierge Technologies, Inc. (“Marygold”), the parent of USCF Investments, Inc. (formerly Wainwright Holdings, Inc.) (“Wainwright”USCF Investments”) from December 2017 to January 2024 and as a management director on the board of directors of Marygold from April 2023 to January 2024. He is also the Treasurer and a member of the Board of Directors of Marygold & Co., a subsidiary of Marygold, since December 2017.November 2019. In addition, Mr. Crumbaugh has served as a director of Wainwright,USCF Investments, the parent and sole member of USCF, since December 2016. Mr. Crumbaugh has been a principal of USCF listed with the CFTC and NFA since July 1, 2015 and, as of

129

January 2017, he is a principal of USCF Advisers LLC.Advisers. USCF Advisers, LLC, an affiliate of USCF, is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and, as of February 2017, is registered as a commodity pool operator, NFA member and swap firm. Since June 2015, Mr. Crumbaugh has been the Treasurer and Secretary of USCF Advisers LLC.Advisers. He also serveshas served as a Management Trustee, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of USCF ETF Trust fromsince May 2015 to present and as Management Trustee of the USCF Mutual Funds Trust from October 2016 to present.2015. Mr. Crumbaugh joined USCF as the Assistant Chief Financial Officer on April 6, 2015. Prior to joining USCF, Mr. Crumbaugh was the Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Sikka Software Corporation, a software service healthcare company providing optimization software and data solutions from April 2014 to April 6, 2015. Mr. Crumbaugh served as a consultant providing technical accounting, IPO readiness and M&A consulting services to various early stage companies with the Connor Group, a technical accounting consulting firm, for the periods of January 2014 through March 2014; October 2012 through November 2012; and January 2011 through February 2011. From December 2012 through December 2013, Mr. Crumbaugh was Vice President, Corporate Controller and Treasurer of Auction.com, LLC, a residential and commercial real estate online auction company. From March 2011 through September 2012, Mr. Crumbaugh was Chief Financial Officer of IP Infusion Inc., a technology company providing network routing and switching software enabling software-defined networking solutions for major mobile carriers and network infrastructure providers. Mr. Crumbaugh earned a B.A. in Accounting and Business Administration from Michigan State University in 1987 and is a Certified Public Accountant – Michigan (inactive).

Daphne G. Frydman, 49, General Counsel of USCF and USCF Advisers, LLC since May 2018, and Director of Compliance of USCF since April 2022. She is also the Chief Legal Officer of USCF ETF Trust since May 2018 and Secretary of the same since December 2021. Ms. Frydman served as Deputy General Counsel of USCF and USCF Advisers, LLC from May 2016 through May 2018. From September 2001 through April 2016, Ms. Frydman was an attorney in private practice at the law firm Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP. Ms. Frydman is listed as a principal of USCF as of June 1, 2022. Ms. Frydman earned her JD from the Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law and a B.A. in College of Letters and Spanish from Wesleyan University.

John P. Love,Nicholas D. Gerber 52,, 55, President and Chief Executive Officer of USCF since May 15, 2015, Management Director of USCF since October 2016 and Chairman of the Board of Directors of USCF since June 2005.October 2019. Mr. GerberLove also served as President and Chief Executive Officeris a director of USCF from June 2005 through June 2015 and Vice PresidentInvestments, a position he has held since June 2015. Mr. Gerber co-founded USCF in 2005 and prior to that, he co-founded Ameristock Corporation in March 1995, a California-based investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 from March 1995 until January 2013. From January 26, 2015 to the present, Mr. Gerber is also the Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary of Concierge Technologies, Inc. (“Concierge”), which is a company publicly traded under the ticker symbol “CNGC.” Concierge is the sole shareholder of Wainwright. From August 1995 to January 2013, Mr. Gerber served as Portfolio Manager of Ameristock Mutual Fund, Inc. On January 11, 2013, the Ameristock Mutual Fund, Inc. merged with and into the Drexel Hamilton Centre American Equity Fund, a series of Drexel Hamilton Mutual Funds. Drexel Hamilton Mutual Funds is not affiliated with Ameristock Corporation, the Ameristock Mutual Fund, Inc. or USCF. From the period June 2014 to the present, Mr. Gerber also serves as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of USCF ETF Trust, an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and has previously served as President of USCF Advisers LLC. From October 2016 to the present, Mr. Gerber also serves as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of USCF Mutual Funds Trust, an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. USCF Advisers LLC, an affiliate of USCF, is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and, as of February 2017, is registered as a commodity pool operator, NFA member and swap firm. In addition to his role as Chairman of the Board of USCF ETF Trust, he also served as its President and Chief Executive Officer from June 2014 until December 2015. Mr. Gerber also has served USCF Advisers on the Board of Managers since June 2013 and as the Vice President since June 2015. In the above roles, Mr. Gerber has gained extensive experience in evaluating and retaining third-party service providers, including custodians, accountants, transfer agents, and distributors. Mr. Gerber has been a principal of USCF listed with the CFTC and NFA since November 2005, an NFA associate member and associated person of USCF since December 2005 and a Branch Manager of USCF since May 2009. Mr. Gerber is a principal of USCF Advisers LLC as of January 2017. Additionally, as of February 2017, he is an associated person, swap associated person, and branch manager of USCF Advisers LLC. Mr. Gerber earned an MBA degree in finance from the University of San Francisco, a B.A. from Skidmore College and holds an NFA Series 3 registration.

128

John P. Love, 46, President and Chief Executive Officer of USCF since June 2015 and Management Director of USCF since October 2016. Mr. Love previously served as a Senior Portfolio Manager for the Related Public Funds from March 2010 through JuneMay 15, 2015. Prior to that, while still at USCF, he was a Portfolio Manager beginning with the launch of USO in April 2006. Mr. Love was the portfolio manager of USO from April 2006 until March 2010 and the portfolio manager for USL from December 2007 until March 2010. Mr. Love has been the portfolio manager of UNG since April 2007, and the portfolio manager of UGA, UHN, and UNL since March 2010. Mr. Love has served as on the Board of Managers of USCF Advisers LLC,since November 2016 and as its President since June 18, 2015. USCF Advisers, an affiliate of USCF, is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and, as of February 2017, is registered as a commodity pool operator, NFA member and swap firm. He also acted as co-portfolio manager of the Stock Split Index Fund, a series of the USCF ETF Trust for the period from September 2014 to December 2015, when he was promoted to the position of President and Chief Executive Officer upon Mr. Gerber’s resignation from those positions. In addition, Mr. Love has served as onof the Board of Managers of USCF Advisers LLC since November 2016 and as its President since June 2015. Mr. Love also is a director of Wainwright Holdings Inc., a position he has held since December 2016.ETF Trust. Mr. Love has been a principal of USCF listed with the CFTC and NFA since January 17, 2006. Mr. Love has been registered as an associated person of USCF since February 2015 and from December 1, 2005 to April 16, 2009. Mr. Love has also been registered as a branch manager of USCF since March 2016. Additionally, Mr. Love has been approved as an NFA swaps associated person since February 2015. Mr. Love is a principal of USCF Advisers LLC as of January 2017. Additionally, effective as of February 2017, he is an associated person and, swap associated person and branch manager of USCF Advisers LLC.Advisers. Mr. Love earned a B.A. from the University of Southern California, holds an NFA Series 3 and FINRA Series 7 registrations and is a CFA Charterholder.

Andrew F Ngim57,, 63, co-founded USCF in 2005 and has served as a Management Director sincefrom May 2005 to April 2023 and, since August 15, 2016, has served as the Chief Operating Officer of USCF. Mr. Ngim has served as the portfolio manager for USCI CPER and USAGCPER since January 2013.2013 and for the United States Agriculture Index Fund from January 2013 to September 2018. Mr. Ngim also served as USCF’s Treasurer from June 2005 to February 2012. In addition, he has been on the Board of Managers and has served as the Assistant Secretary and Assistant Treasurer of USCF Advisers since its inception in June 2013.2013 and Chief Operating Officer of USCF Advisers since March 2021. Prior to and concurrent with his services to USCF and USCF Advisers, from January 1999 to January 2013, Mr. Ngim served as a Managing Director for Ameristock Corporation, a California-based investment adviser, which he co-founded in March 1995, and was Co-Portfolio Manager of Ameristock Mutual Fund, Inc. from January 2000 to January 2013., Mr. Ngim also served as portfolio manager of (a) the following series of the USCF ETF Trust: (1) the Stock Split Index Fund from September 2014 to October 2017, and (2) the USCF Restaurant Leaders Fund from November 2016 to October 2017, both series of the(3) USCF ETF Trust. FromSummerHaven SHPEI Index Fund from December 2017 to October 2020, (4) USCF SummerHaven SHPEN Index Fund from December 2017 to April 2020, and (b) a series of USCF Mutual Funds Trust, the present,USCF Commodity Strategy Fund, from March 2017 to March 2019. Mr. Ngim also serves as the portfolio manager for the USCF SummerHaven SHPEI Index Fund and the USCF SummerHaven SHPEN Index Fund, both of which arefollowing series of the USCF ETF Trust.Trust: (1) USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund, from May 2018 to present, (2) the USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund from January 2023 to present, (3) the USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund from May 2023 to present, (4) the USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund from August 9, 2023 to present, and (5) the USCF Aluminum Strategy Fund from October 6, 2023 to present. Mr. Ngim servesserved as a Management Trustee of the USCF ETF Trust from August 2014 to the present and as a Management Trustee for the USCF Mutual Funds Trust from October 2016 to present.August 2023. Mr. Ngim has been a principal of USCF listed with the CFTC and NFA since November 2005 and a principal of USCF Advisers LLC since January 2017. USCF Advisers, LLC, an affiliate of

130

USCF, is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and, as of February 2017, is registered as a commodity pool operator, NFA member and swap firm. Mr. Ngim earned his B.A. from the University of California at Berkeley.

Robert L. Nguyen, 58,64, Management Director and principal since July 2015. Mr. Nguyen served on the Board of WainwrightUSCF Investments from December 2014 to December 2016. Mr. Nguyen co-founded USCF in 2005 and served as a Management Director until March 2012. Mr. Nguyen was an Investment Manager with Ribera Investment Management, an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, from January 2013 to March 2015. Prior to and concurrent with his services to USCF, from January 2000 to January 2013, Mr. Nguyen served as a Managing Principal for Ameristock Corporation, a California-based investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, which he co-founded in March 1995. Mr. Nguyen was a principal of USCF listed with the CFTC and NFA from November 2005 through March 2012 and an associated person of USCF listed with the CFTC and NFA from November 2007 through March 2012. Mr. Nguyen has been a principal of USCF listed with the CFTC and NFA since July 2015 and an associated person and a swap associated person of USCF listed with the CFTC and NFA since December 2015. As of February 2017, he also is an associated person and swap associated person of USCF Advisers LLC.Advisers. USCF Advisers, LLC, an affiliate of USCF, is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and, as of February 2017, is registered as a commodity pool operator, NFA member and swap firm. Mr. Nguyen earned his B.S. from California State University at Sacramento, and holds NFA Series 3 and FINRA Series 7 registrations.

Carolyn M. Yu, 59, General CounselKathryn D. Rooney, 51, Management Director of USCF since April 2023 and Chief ComplianceMarketing Officer of USCF since May 2015 and February 2013, respectively, and from August 2011 through April 2015, Ms. Yu served as Assistant General Counsel.January 2016. Since May 2015, Ms. YuJanuary 2016. She also has served as Chief Legal Officer and Chief Compliance Officera member of the Board of Directors of The Marygold Companies, which is the parent of USCF Advisers LLCInvestments, Inc., from January 2017 to April 2023 USCF Investments, Inc. is the sole member of USCF. Previously, Ms. Rooney was the National Sales Director at USCF from January 2007 to December 2015. Ms. Rooney was the Director of Business Development at the Ameristock Corporation, a California-based registered investment adviser, from September 2003 to January 2007. Prior to joining the Ameristock Corporation, she was Regional Sales Director at Accessor Capital Management, a registered investment adviser that was based in Seattle, Washington, from October 2002 to August 2003, National Sales Director at ALPS Mutual Fund Services, Inc., a boutique investment services company offering outsourced back office operations and USCF ETFdistribution services to mutual fund managers, from June 1999 to October 2002, and Trust Officer at Fifth Third Bancorp, an American bank holding company headquartered in Ohio, from June 1994 to May 1999. Additionally, Ms. Rooney has been registered as well as Chief AML Officeran associated person of USCF ETF Trust. Priorsince August 2015 and from December 2005 to May 2015, Ms. Yu was the Assistant Chief Compliance OfficerApril 2009 and AML Officer of the USCF ETF Trust. Previously, Ms. Yu servedis listed as Branch Chief with the Securities Enforcement Branch for the State of Hawaii, Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs from February 2008 to August 2011. Since August 2013, in the casea principal of USCF and Januaryeffective as of April 2023. Additionally, effective as of February 2017, in the caseshe is an associated person of USCF Advisers LLC, Ms. Yu has been a principal listed with the CFTC and NFA. USCF Advisers, LLC, an affiliate of USCF, which is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and, as of February 2017, is registered as a commodity pool operator, NFA member and swap firm. Ms. Yu earned her JDRooney graduated from Golden Gate University SchoolWellesley College with a Bachelor of LawArts in economics and a B.S.psychology in business administration from San Francisco State University.June 1994.

Gordon L. Ellis, 71,77, Independent Director of USCF since September 2005. Previously, Mr. Ellis was a founder of International Absorbents, Inc., Director and Chairman since July 1985 and July 1988, respectively, and Chief Executive Officer and President since November 1996. He also served as Chairman of Absorption Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of International Absorbents, Inc., which is a leading developer and producer of environmentally friendly pet care and industrial products, from May July 1985 until July 2010 when it was sold to Kinderhook Industries, a private investment banking firm and remained as a director until March 2013 when Absorption Corp was sold again to J. Rettenmaier & Söhne Group, a German manufacturing firm. Concurrent with that, he founded and has served as Chairman from November 2010 to present of Lupaka Gold Corp., a firm that acquires, explores develops, and evaluates golddeveloped mining properties and is currently driving an arbitration suit against the Republic of Peru. He also serves as a director of Goldhaven Resources, a firm that acquires, explores and develops mining properties in Peru, South America.Canada and Chile, from August 2020 to present. Mr. Ellis has his Chartered Directors designation from The Director’s College (a joint venture of McMaster University and The Conference Board of Canada). He has been a principal of USCF listed with the CFTC and NFA since November 2005. Mr. Ellis is ana professional engineer, retired, and earned an MBA in international finance.

129

Malcolm R. Fobes III, 53,59, Independent Director of USCF and Chairman of USCF’s audit committee since September 2005. He founded and is the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief ExecutiveInvestment Officer of Berkshire Capital Holdings, Inc., a California-based investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 that has been sponsoring and providing portfolio management services to mutual funds since June 1997. Mr. Fobes serves as Chairman and President of The Berkshire Funds, a mutual fund investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Since 1997, Mr. Fobes has also served as portfolio manager of the Berkshire Focus Fund, a mutual fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which concentrates its investments in the electronic technology industry. He was also contributing editor of Start a Successful Mutual Fund: The Step-by-Step Reference Guide to Make It Happen (JV Books, 1995). Mr. Fobes has been a principal of USCF listed with the CFTC and NFA since November 2005. He earned a B.S. in finance with a minor in economics from San Jose State University in California.

Peter M. Robinson, 60,66, Independent Director of USCF since September 2005. Mr. Robinson has been a Research Fellow since 1993 with the Hoover Institution, a public policy think tank located on the campus of Stanford University. He authored three books and has

131

been published in the New York Times,Red Herring,, and Forbes ASAP and is the editor of Can Congress Be Fixed?: Five Essays on Congressional Reform (Hoover Institution Press, 1995). Mr. Robinson has been a principal of USCF listed with the CFTC and NFA since December 2005. He earned an MBA from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, graduated from Oxford University in 1982 after studying politics, philosophy, and economics and graduated summa cum laude from Dartmouth College in 1979.

The following are individual Principals, as that term is defined in CFTC Rule 3.1, for USCF: John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Daphne G. Frydman, Nicholas D. Gerber, Melinda D. Gerber, Andrew F Ngim, Robert L. Nguyen, Peter M. Robinson, Kathryn D. Rooney, Scott Schoenberger, Gordon L. Ellis, Malcolm R. Fobes III, Ray W. Allen, Kevin A. Baum, Carolyn Yu and USCF Investments, Inc., formerly Wainwright Holdings, Inc. The individuals who are Principals due to their positions are John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Nicholas D. Gerber,Daphne G. Frydman, Andrew F Ngim, Robert L. Nguyen, Peter M. Robinson, Kathryn D. Rooney, Gordon L. Ellis, Malcolm R. Fobes III, Ray W. Allen, and Kevin Baum and Carolyn Yu.A. Baum. In addition, WainwrightUSCF Investments is a Principal because it is the sole member of USCF. None of the Principals owns or has any other beneficial interest in USCIFT. Ray Allen and John P. Love makeany Trust Series. Andrew F Ngim makes trading and investment decisions for USCIFT. John P. Loveeach Trust Series. Andrew F Ngim, Darius Coby, Seth Lancaster and Ray AllenZach Sanchez execute trades on behalf of USCIFT.each Trust Series. In addition, Nicholas D. Gerber, John P. Love, Robert L. Nguyen, Ray W. Allen, Kevin A. Baum, Kathryn Rooney, Maya Lowry, and Ryan Katz are registered with the CFTC as Associated Persons of USCF and are NFA Associate Members. John P. Love, Robert Nguyen,Kevin A. Baum and Ray W. Allen and Kevin Baum are also registered with the CFTC as Swaps Associated Persons. In addition, Nicholas D. Gerber, John P. Love, Robert Nguyen, Ray Allen, Kevin Baum, Kathryn Rooney, Maya Lowry, and Ryan Katz are registered with the CFTC as Associated Persons of USCF and are NFA Associate Members. John P. Love, Robert Nguyen, Ray Allen and Kevin Baum are also registered with the CFTC as Swaps Associated Persons.

SummerHaven

SummerHaven

Background of SummerHaven

SummerHaven is a Delaware limited liability company formed on August 11, 2009. Its offices are located at Soundview Plaza, 1266 East Main Street, 4th Floor, Stamford CT 06902. SummerHaven has been registered under the CEA as a commodity pool operator and a commodity trading advisor since October 9, 2009. SummerHaven became an NFA member effective October 9, 2009. SummerHaven was a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, from September 2009 to January 2010, when it withdrew its registration because its assets under management were below $25 million. Since September 2017, SummerHaven has been re-registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 with the SEC. The firm’s management team has over 50 years of combined capital markets experience including commodity research and modeling, trading, investment management and risk management expertise.

Background of SHIM

SHIM is the owner, creator and licensor of commodity indices including the SCI, the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total ReturnSM (“SDCI”) and the SummerHaven Dynamic Agriculture Index Total ReturnSM (“SDAI”). SHIM is a Delaware limited liability company formed on August 11, 2009. It maintains its main business office at Soundview Plaza, 1266 East Main Street, 4th4th Floor, Stamford, CT 06902. The firm maintains a website atwww.summerhavenindex.com. www.summerhavenindex.com. The firm creates innovative commodities indices focused on providing investors with better risk-adjusted returns than traditional commodity index benchmarks.

Principals of SummerHaven

Kurt J. Nelsonhas been employed by SummerHaven since August 2009 as a partner. His duties include investor relations, marketing and product structuring. From September 2007 to July 2009, Mr. Nelson was employed by UBS Investment Bank as a Managing Director where he led the U.S. commodity index for UBS. Mr. Nelson was a supervisory committee member of the UBS Bloomberg CMCI Index and Dow-Jones UBS Commodity Index, and he was responsible for launching the UBS exchange-traded note platform (E-TRACS). From March 1998 to January 2007, Mr. Nelson was employed by AIG Financial Products Corp. as a Managing Director. Mr. Nelson created and managed the high-net-worth derivatives business for AIG Financial Products, and he also provided equity derivative and commodity index solutions for U.S. corporations, institutional dealers and principal dealers. Mr. Nelson was not employed from January 2007 to September 2007. Mr. Nelson became listed as a principal of SummerHaven effective October 1, 2009, as an associated person of SummerHaven effective October 12, 2009 and as an associate member of the NFA effective October 12, 2009. Mr. Nelson is 4852 years old.

130

Ashraf R. Rizvihas been employed by SummerHaven since April 2009 as a partner. His duties include trading and operational management. From October 1994 to February 2008, Mr. Rizvi was employed by UBS Investment Bank as a Managing Director and Global Head of Commodities Trading. Mr. Rizvi was not employed from February 2008 to April 2009. Mr. Rizvi became listed as a principal of SummerHaven effective October 9, 2009, as an associated person of SummerHaven effective September 9, 2011 and as an associate member of the NFA effective September 9, 2011. Mr. Rizvi is 55 years old.

K. Geert Rouwenhorsthas been employed by SummerHaven since April 2009 as a partner. His duties include research and investor relations. From July 1990 to present, Dr. Rouwenhorst has been employed by Yale School of Management as a Professor of Finance. Dr. Rouwenhorst became listed as a principal of SummerHaven effective October 8, 2009, as an associated person of SummerHaven effective September 1, 2011 and as an associate member of the NFA effective September 1, 2011. Dr. Rouwenhorst is 5761 years old.

132

Joseph J. SchultzTable of Contents

Robert Dieterhas been employed byserved as Chief Financial Officer of SummerHaven since April 2011May 2017 and also as a partner. His duties include supervision of the firm’s reporting, accounting, operations and compliance. From February 2004 to April 2011, Mr. Schultz was the Chief Operating Officer and Chief Compliance Officer of SummerHaven since January 2020. At SummerHaven he has responsibility for operations, corporate accounting, tax and financial reporting as well as compliance. Prior to joining SummerHaven in May 2017, Mr. Dieter founded a Managing Partner at Basso Capital Management, L.P., an employee ownedconsulting practice focused on providing chief financial officer and compliance services to small and medium investment advisors where he worked from October 2009 to present. Mr. Dieter co- founded Seacross Global Advisors, a hedge fund sponsor which provides servicesfirm where he served as the Chief Financial Officer from April 2007 to pooledSeptember 2009. Mr. Dieter received his M.B.A. from Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College in 1972 and a B.A. from Tufts University in 1969.

Babu V. Sonti, of SummerHaven Investment Management is the Chief Technology Officer since June 2016 and, since 2021, also the Chief Operating Officer. Previously, he was a Special Consultant to the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund from September 2015 to May 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Sonti was the Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of Ameritas Investment Partners, a registered investment vehicles focused primarily on convertible securitiesadviser managing equity, fixed income and their underlying equity shares,index derivatives, from January 2006 to August 2015 where he was responsible for the oversight of the firm’s day-to-day operations. From May 1997 to February 2004, Mr. Schultz was a Vice President at AIG Trading Group, a subsidiary of American International Group, Inc. which provides currencydeveloping, maintaining and commodity prime brokerage, back-office support, access to e-commerceresearching infrastructure and trading portals, and political-economic research and consulting services for the financial services industry, where he designed systems, procedural protocol and managed the dailytechnologies along with trading operations for theequity, fixed income and foreign currency options departmentindex derivatives. Mr. Sonti was part of the founding team at Summit Investment Partners from June 1988 where he worked until December 2005, when Summit Investment Partners was acquired by Ameritas. Summit Investment Partners was a registered investment adviser that managed Summit Mutual Funds along with separate accounts with equity, fixed income and hedge funds. On July 11, 2011,index derivatives for institutional investors. Mr. Schultz became listed asSonti’s application to be a principal of SummerHaven.SummerHaven was submitted to the National Futures Association on March 17, 2022 and remains pending. Mr. SchultzSonti received a B.B.A.his M.A. in FinanceMathematics from Baruchthe University of Maine and was the Assistant Professor of Mathematics & Computer Science at the College andof Wooster. Mr. Sonti is 4666 years old.

Audit Committee

The Board of USCF has an audit committee which is made up of the three independent directors (Gordon L. Ellis, Malcolm R. Fobes III, and Peter M. Robinson). The audit committee is governed by an audit committee charter that is posted on each Trust Series’ website at www.uscfinvestments.com. Any shareholder of a Trust Series may also obtain a printed copy of the audit committee charter, free of charge, by calling 1-800-920-0259. The Board has determined that each member of the audit committee meets the financial literacy requirements of the NYSE Arca and the audit committee charter. The Board has further determined that each of Messrs. Ellis and Fobes have accounting or related financial management expertise, as required by the NYSE Arca, such that each of them is considered an “Audit Committee Financial Expert” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.

Other Committees

Since the individuals who perform work on behalf of each Trust Series are not compensated by such Trust Series, but instead by USCF, none of the Trust Series has a compensation committee. Similarly, since the directors noted above serve on the Board of USCF, there is no nominating committee of the Board that acts on behalf of any Trust Series. USCF believes that it is necessary for each member of the Board to possess many qualities and skills. USCF further believes that all directors should possess a considerable amount of business management and educational experience. When vacancies in USCF’s Board occur, the members of the Board consider a candidate’s management experience as well as his/her background, stature, conflicts of interest, integrity and ethics. In connection with this, the Board also considers issues of diversity, such as diversity of gender, race and national origin, education, professional experience and differences in viewpoints and skills. The Board does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity; however, the Board believes that it is essential that the Board members represent diverse viewpoints.

Corporate Governance Policy

The Board of USCF has adopted a Corporate Governance Policy that applies to each Trust Series and the Related Public Funds. Each Trust Series has posted the text of the Corporate Governance Policy on its website at www.uscfinvestments.com. Any shareholder of the Trust Series’ may also obtain a printed copy of the Corporate Governance Policy, free of charge, by calling 1-800-920-0259.

Code of Ethics

USCF has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, and also to each Trust Series. Each Trust Series has posted the text of the Code of Ethics on its website at www.uscfinvestments.com. Any shareholder of the Trust Series’ may also obtain a printed copy of the Code of Ethics, free of charge, by calling 1-800-920-0259. Each Trust Series intends to disclose any amendments or waivers to the Code of Ethics applicable to USCF’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, on its website.

Executive Sessions of the Non-Management Directors

In accordance with the Corporate Governance Policy of USCF, the non-management directors of the Board (who are the same as the independent directors of the Board) meet separately from the other directors in regularly scheduled executive sessions, without the presence of Management Directors or executive officers of USCF. The non-management directors have designated Gordon L. Ellis to preside over each such executive session. Interested parties who wish to make their concerns known to the non-management directors

133

may communicate directly with Mr. Ellis by writing to 475 Milan Drive, No. 103, San Jose, CA 95134-2453 or by e-mail at uscf.director@gmail.com.

131

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of USCF is led by a Chairman, Nicholas Gerber. Mr. John P. Love separatelywho also serves as USCF’s President and Chief Executive Officer. The Board’s responsibilities include: (i) the selection, evaluation, retention and succession of the Chief Executive Officer and the oversight of the selection and performance of other executive officers, (ii) understanding, reviewing and monitoring the implementation of strategic plans, annual operating plans and budgets, (iii) the selection and oversight of each Trust Series’ independent auditors and the oversight of each Trust Series’ financial statements, (iv) advising management on significant issues, (v) the review and approval of significant company actions and certain other matters, (vi) nominating directors and committee members and overseeing effective corporate governance and (vii) the consideration of other constituencies, such as USCF’s and the Trust Series’ customers, employees, suppliers and the communities impacted by each Trust Series. The non-management directors have designated Gordon L. Ellis as the presiding independent director. Mr. Ellis’ role as the presiding independent director includes presiding over each executive session of the non-management directors, facilitating communications by shareholders and employees with the non-management directors and may also include representing the non-management directors with respect to certain matters as to which the views of the non-management directors are sought pursuant to the Trust Series’ Corporate Governance Policy.

The Board believes that Mr. GerberLove is best situated to serve as Chairman of USCF because he is the director most familiar with the business of USCF as the founderPresident and CEO of USCF. Because of his background, he is most capable of effectively leading the discussiondiscussions and execution of new strategic objectives.objectives while facilitating information flow between USCF and the full Board, including the independent directors, which is essential to effective governance. The independent directors of USCF are actively involved in the oversight of USCF and, because of their varied backgrounds, provide different perspectives in connection with the oversight of USCF, the Trust Series’ and the Related Public Funds. USCF’s independent directors bring expertise from outside USCF and the commodities industry, while Mr. GerberLove brings company-specific and industry-specific experience and expertise.

Risk Management

The full Board is actively involved in overseeing the management and operation of USCF, including oversight of the risks that face the Trust Series’ and the Related Public Funds. For example, the Board has adopted an Investment PolicyUSCF’s compliance policies and a Policy for Use of Derivatives. The policiesprocedures are intended to ensure that USCF takes prudent and careful action while entering into and managing investments taken by each Trust Series, including Oil Futures Contracts orand Other RelatedOil-Related Investments such as OTC swap contracts. Additionally, the policies are intended to provide assurance that there is sufficient flexibility in controlling risks and returns associated with the use of investments by each Trust Series. The policies and procedures, among other things, limit each Trust Series’ ability to have too high of a concentration of its assets in non-exchange traded futures contracts or clearedprovide criteria for OTC swap contracts or concentrating its investments in too few counterparties absent prior approval from the Board. Existing counterparties are reviewed periodically by the Board to ensure that they continue to meet the criteria outlined in the policies. The Board tasks USCF with assessing risks, including market risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, cash flow risk, basis risk, legal and tax risk, settlement risk, and operational risk.

documentation.

There are certain risks that may arise as a result of a growth in assets under management. For example, if position limits are imposed on each Trust Series and the assets under management continue to increase, then a Trust Series may not be able to invest solely in the Applicable Benchmark Futures ContractContracts and may have to invest in OTC swap contracts or Other RelatedOil-Related Investments as it seeks to track its benchmark. Other Futures Contracts in which a Trust Series may invest may not track changes in the Applicable Index.price of the Benchmark Futures Contract. Other RelatedOil-Related Investments, including OTC swap contracts, may also expose each Trust Series to increased counterparty credit risk and may be less liquid and more difficult to value than Futures Contracts. The Trust Series and the Related Public Funds ameliorate the potential credit, liquidity and valuation risks by fully collateralizing any OTC swap contracts or other investments.

Other Information134

In addition to the certificationsTable of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of USCF filed or furnished with this annual report on Form 10-K regarding the quality of each of the Trust Series’ public disclosure, each Trust Series will submit, within 30 days after filing this annual report on Form 10-K, to the NYSE Arca a certification of the Chief Executive Officer of USCF certifying that he is not aware of any violation by a Trust Series, as applicable, of NYSE Arca corporate governance listing standards.Contents

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires directors and executive officers of USCF and persons who are beneficial owners of at least 10% of a Trust Series’ shares to file with the SEC an Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities on Form 3 within 10 calendar days of first becoming a director, executive officer or beneficial owner of at least 10% of a Trust Series’ shares and a Statement of Changes of Beneficial Ownership of Securities on Form 4 within 2 business days of a subsequent acquisition or disposition of shares of a Trust Series. To each Trust Series’ knowledge, based upon a review of copies of reports furnished to it with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and upon the written representations of the directors and executive officers of USCF, all of such persons have filed all required reports.

132

Part III

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Compensation to USCF and Other Compensation

None of the Trust Series directly compensates any of the executive officers noted above. The executive officers noted above are compensated by USCF for the work they perform on behalf of each Trust Series and other entities controlled by USCF. None of the Trust Series reimburses USCF for, nor does it set the amount or form of any portion of, the compensation paid to the executive officers by USCF. Each Trust Series pays fees to USCF pursuant to the Trust Agreement. Each of USCI CPER and USAGCPER is contractually obligated to pay USCF a fee, which is paid monthly, equal to 0.95% per annum of average daily total net assets. From May 1, 2014 through December 31, 2017,2023, USCF contractually lowered the management fee to 0.80% per annum of average daily total net assets for USCI 0.65% per annum of average daily total net assets for CPER, and 0.65% per annum of average daily total net assets for USAG.

CPER.

For 2017,2023, each of USCI CPER and USAGCPER accrued aggregate management fees of $4,126,513, $67,217,$1,567,809 and $12,013,$921,146, respectively.

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth compensation earned during the year ended December 31, 20172023 by the directors of USCF. Each of USCI’s CPER’s and USAG’sCPER’s portion of the aggregate fees paid for director’s fees and insurance for the year ended December 31, 20172023 was $41,728, $835$81,283 and $150,$76,810, respectively.

    

    

    

    

    

Change in

    

    

Pension

 

Fees

Value and

 

Earned

Nonqualified

 

or

Non-Equity

Deferred

 

Paid in

Stock

Option

Incentive Plan

 

Compensation

All Other

Name

    

Cash

    

Awards

    

Awards

    

Compensation

     

Plan

    

Compensation

    

Total

Management Directors

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

John P. Love

$

 

NA

 

NA

 

NA

$

$

$

Stuart P. Crumbaugh

$

 

NA

 

NA

 

NA

$

$

$

Robert L. Nguyen

$

 

NA

 

NA

 

NA

$

$

$

Kathryn D. Rooney

$

NA

NA

NA

$

$

$

Independent Directors

 

  

 

  

 

  

Peter M. Robinson

$

14,499

 

NA

 

NA

 

NA

$

$

$

14,499

Gordon L. Ellis

$

14,499

 

NA

 

NA

 

NA

$

$

$

14,499

Malcolm R. Fobes III(1)

$

17,399

 

NA

 

NA

 

NA

$

$

$

17,399

Name Fees
Earned
or
Paid in
Cash
  Stock
Awards
 Option
Awards
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
 Change in
Pension
Value  and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Plan
  All Other
Compensation
  Total 
Management Directors                      
Nicholas Gerber $0  NA NA NA $0  $0  $0 
John P. Love $0  NA NA NA $0  $0  $0 
Andrew F Ngim $0  NA NA NA $0  $0  $0 
Robert L. Nguyen $0  NA NA NA $0  $0  $0 
Independent Directors                      
Peter M. Robinson $13,348  NA NA NA $0  $0  $13,348 
Gordon L. Ellis $13,348  NA NA NA $0  $0  $13,348 
Malcolm R. Fobes III(1) $16,017  NA NA NA $0  $0  $16,017 

(1)Mr. Fobes serves as chairman of the audit committee of USCF and receives additional compensation from USCF, in recognition of the additional responsibilities he has undertaken in this role.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

None of the directors or executive officers of USCF owns any shares of any Trust Series. USCF owns 5 shares of USCI 5 shares of USAG and 40 shares of CPER. In addition, USCF is not aware of any 5% holder of shares of USCI or USAG as of February 8, 2018.CPER.

As of February 8, 2018, the following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of CPER’s shares by each person or entity known to it to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of its outstanding shares. The information in the table is based solely on a Schedule SC 13D/A filed with the SEC on February 6, 2018 by Counsel Portfolio Services, Inc.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
  Percent of Class 
       
Counsel Portfolio Services, Inc.*
2680 Skymark Avenue, 7th Floor
Mississauga, Ontario A6 L4W 5L6
  151,099   21.5855%

*Counsel Portfolio Services, Inc. has reported that it has sole voting power and sole dispositive power over the shares.

133

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Each Trust Series has and will continue to have certain relationships with USCF and its affiliates. However, there have been no direct financial transactions between any Trust Series and the directors or officers of USCF that have not been disclosed herein. See “Item“Item 11. Executive CompensationCompensation” and Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. Any transaction with a related person that must be disclosed in accordance with SEC Regulation S-K item 404(a), including financial transactions by any Trust Series with directors or executive officers of USCF or holders of beneficial interests in USCF or any

135

Trust Series of more than 5%, will be subject to the provisions regarding “Fiduciary Duty” as set forth in Section 5.6 of the Trust Agreement and will be reviewed and approved by the audit committee of the Board of USCF.

Director Independence

In February 2016,2022, the Board undertook a review of the independence of the directors of USCF and considered whether any director has a material relationship or other arrangement with USCF, the Trust Series or the Related Public Funds that could compromise his ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his responsibilities. As a result of this review, the Board determined that each of Messrs. Fobes, Ellis and Robinson is an “independent director,” as defined under the rules of NYSE Arca.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The fees for services billed to USCI by its independent auditors for the last two fiscal years are as follows:

    

2023

    

2022

Audit fees

$

107,500

$

115,000

Audit-related fees

 

 

Tax fees

 

17,000

 

All other fees

 

5,000

 

$

129,500

$

115,000

  2017  2016 
Audit fees $165,000  $165,000 
Audit-related fees  -   - 
Tax fees  -   - 
All other fees  -   - 
  $165,000  $165,000 

The fees for services billed to CPER by its independent auditors for the last two fiscal years are as follows:

    

2023

    

2022

Audit fees

$

67,500

$

75,000

Audit-related fees

 

 

Tax fees

 

17,000

 

All other fees

 

5,000

 

$

89,500

$

75,000

  2017  2016 
Audit fees $25,000  $25,000 
Audit-related fees  -   - 
Tax fees  -   - 
All other fees  -   - 
  $25,000  $25,000 

The fees for services billed to USAG by its independent auditors for the last fiscal year are as follows

  2017  2016 
Audit fees $25,000  $25,000 
Audit-related fees  -   - 
Tax fees  -   - 
All other fees  -   - 
  $25,000  $25,000 

Audit fees consist of fees paid to Cohen & Company, Ltd. and Spicer Jeffries LLP for (i) the audit of each of the Trust’s and the Trust Series’ annual financial statements included in the annual report on Form 10-K, and review of financial statements included in the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and certain of the Trust’s and the Trust Series’ current reports on Form 8-K; (ii) the audit of the Trust’s and each Trust Series’ internal control over financial reporting included in the annual report on Form 10-K; and (iii) services that are normally provided by the Independent Registered Public Accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings of registration statements.

Tax fees consist of fees paid to Spicer Jeffries LLP for professional services rendered in connection with tax compliance and partnership income tax return filings.

The audit committee has established policies and procedures which are intended to control the services provided by the Trust’s and the Trust Series’ independent auditors and to monitor their continuing independence. Under these policies and procedures, no audit or permitted non-audit services (including fees and terms thereof), except for thede minimis exceptions for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act, may be undertaken by the Trust Series’ independent auditors unless the engagement is specifically pre-approved by the audit committee. The audit committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees consisting of one or more members when appropriate, including the authority to grant pre-approvals of audit and permitted non-audit services, provided that decisions of such subcommittee to grant pre-approvals must be presented to the full audit committee at its next scheduled meeting.

134

136

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

1.See Index to Financial Statements on page 83.93.

2.No financial statement schedules are filed herewith because (i) such schedules are not required or (ii) the information required has been presented in the aforementioned financial statements.

3.Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

Exhibit Index

Listed below are the exhibits which are filed or furnished as part of this annual report on Form 10-K (according to the number assigned to them in Item 601 of Regulation S-K):

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit

Number

Description of Document

3.1(1)

Certificate of Statutory Trust of the Registrant.

3.2(2)

Fourth Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement.

3.3(8)

3.3(5)

Sixth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of the Sponsor.

10.1(11)

4.1(9)

Description of Securities.

10.1(7)

Form of Authorized Participant Agreement.

10.2(4)

10.1(8)

Futures and Cleared Derivatives Transactions Customer Agreement with RBC Capital Markets, LLC

10.2(3)

Marketing Agent Agreement.

10.3(5)

10.3(4)

Amendment Agreement to Marketing Agent Agreement.

10.4(4)

10.3(5)

Custodian Agreement.

10.5(5)Amendment Agreement to Custodian Agreement.
10.6(4)Administrative Agency Agreement.
10.7(5)Amendment Agreement to Administrative Agency Agreement.
10.8(6)Licensing Agreement.
10.9(6)Advisory Agreement.
10.10(7)Amendment No. 1 to Licensing Agreement.
10.11(7)Amendment No. 1 to Advisory Agreement.
10.12(7)Amendment No. 2 to Licensing Agreement.
10.13(7)Amendment No. 2 to Advisory Agreement.
10.14(9)Amendment No. 3 to Licensing Agreement.
10.15(9)Amendment No. 3 to Advisory Agreement.
10.16(10)Second Amendment Agreement6 to the Marketing Agent Agreement.Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2022, between United States Commodity Funds LLC, United States Commodity Index Funds Trust, and ALPS Distributors, Inc.

10.17(10)

10.4(6)

Second AmendmentForm of Custody Agreement to the Custodian Agreement.with The Bank of New York Mellon.

10.18(10)

10.5(6)

Second AmendmentForm of Transfer Agency and Service Agreement to thewith The Bank of New York Mellon.

10.6(6)

Form of Fund Administration and Accounting Agreement with Administrative Agency Agreement.Agreement with The Bank of New York Mellon.

14.1(8)

10.7(8)

Code of Ethics.Amended and Restated Licensing Agreement.

23.1(12)

10.8(8)

Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement.

23.1(10)

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

23.2(12)

31.1(10)

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

31.1(12)Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2(12)

31.2(10)

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1(12)

32.1(10)

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U. S. C. 1350).

32.2(12)

32.2(10)

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U. S. C. 1350).

101.INS

97.1(10)

Dodd-Frank Compensation Recoupment Policy.

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.

(1)

(1)

Incorporated by reference to the initial Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-164024) filed on December 24, 2009.

(2)

Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 15, 2017.

(4)

(3)

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 5 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-164024) filed on July 23, 2010.

137

(5)

(4)

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-170844) filed on August 31, 2011.

(6)

(5)

Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-164024) filed on June 21, 2010.
(7)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-170844) filed on November 26, 2010.
(8)

Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed on March 11, 2016.

(9)

(6)

Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011,8-K, filed on August 15, 2011.March 30, 2020.

(10)

(7)

Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, filed on August 9, 2012
(11)

Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 (File No. 333-195018) filed on March 31, 2016.

(12)

(8)

Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 24, 2018.

(9)

Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed on March 13, 2020.

(10)

Filed herewith.

135

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

None

138

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

United States Commodity Index Funds Trust (Registrant)

(Registrant)

By: United States Commodity Funds LLC, as Sponsor

By:

By:

/s/John P. Love

John P. Love

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal executive officer)

Date: February 29, 2024

Date: March 14, 2018

By:

/s/Stuart P. Crumbaugh

Stuart P. Crumbaugh

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal financial and accounting officer)

Date: March 14, 2018February 29, 2024

136

139

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities* and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitle (Capacity)Date
/s/John P. LoveChief Executive Officer ofMarch 14, 2018
John P. LoveUnited States Commodity Funds, LLC
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/Stuart P. CrumbaughChief Financial Officer ofMarch 14, 2018
Stuart P. CrumbaughUnited States Commodity Funds, LLC
(Principal Financial Officer)

*The Registrant is a trust and the persons are signing in their capacities as officers of United States Commodity Funds LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.

137