UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172020
Commission File Number: 000-53650
Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | 20-8198863 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
1985 Cedar Bridge Avenue, Suite 1, Lakewood, New Jersey | 08701 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(888) 808-7348
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). Yes¨ ☐ Nox ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨☐ No x☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x☒ No ¨☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x☒ No¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | Accelerated filer |
Non-accelerated filer | Smaller reporting company |
Emerging growth company |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.¨ ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨☐ No x☒
There is no established market for the Registrant’s common stock. The Registrant has adopted a Policy for Estimation of Common Stock Value (the “Estimated Valuation Policy”) pursuant to which it has estimated the net asset value per share of its common stock (“NAV per Share”). As of September 30, 2017,2020, the estimated NAV per Share was $7.98.$9.42. For a full description of the methodologies used to estimate the NAV per Share of the Registrant’s common stock, see Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities-Market Information” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. There were 24,996,58620.2 million shares of common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2017,2020, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. As of March 16, 2018,15, 2021, the registrant had 24.620.2 million shares of common stock outstanding.
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST V, INC.
(FORMERLY BEHRINGER HARVARD OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.)
FORM 10-K
Year Ended December 31, 20172020
i
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements include discussion and analysis of the financial condition of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. (formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.) and our subsidiaries (which may be referred to herein as the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”), including our ability to make accretive real estate or real estate-related investments, rent space on favorable terms, to address our debt maturities and to fund our liquidity requirements, to sell our assets when we believe advantageous to achieve our investment objectives, our anticipated capital expenditures, the amount and timing of anticipated future cash distributions to our stockholders, the estimated net asset value per share of our common stock (“NAV per Share”), and other matters. Words such as “may,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “would,” “could,” “should” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but reflect the intent, belief or current expectations of our management based on their knowledge and understanding of the business and industry, the economy and other future conditions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we caution stockholders not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including but not limited to the factors listed and described under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the factors described below:
market and economic challenges experienced by the U.S. and global economies or real estate industry as a whole and the local economic conditions in the markets in which our investments are | ||
located. Additionally, our business and financial performance may be adversely affected by current and future economic and other conditions; such as recession, political upheaval or uncertainty, terrorism and acts of war, natural and man-made disasters, cybercrime, and outbreaks of contagious diseases; |
uncertainties regarding the impact of the current COVID-19 pandemic, and restrictions and other measures intended to prevent its spread on our business and the economy generally; |
● | the availability of cash flow from operating activities for distributions, if any; | |
conflicts of interest arising out of our relationships with our advisor and its affiliates; | ||
our ability to retain our executive officers and other key individuals who provide advisory and property management services to us; | ||
our level of debt and the terms and limitations imposed on us by our debt agreements; | ||
the availability of credit generally, and any failure to obtain debt financing at favorable terms or a failure to satisfy the conditions and requirements of that debt; | ||
our ability to make accretive investments in a diversified portfolio of assets; | ||
future changes in market factors that could affect the ultimate performance of | ||
our ability to secure leases at favorable rental rates; | ||
our ability to sell our assets at a price and on a timeline consistent with our investment objectives; |
● | impairment charges; |
unfavorable changes in laws or regulations impacting our business, our assets or our key relationships; and |
● | factors that could affect our ability to qualify as a real estate investment trust. |
Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K reflect our management’s view only as of the date of this Report, and may ultimately prove to be incorrect. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results, except as required by applicable law. We intend for these forward-looking statements to be covered by the applicable safe harbor provisions created by Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.
Cautionary Note
The representations, warranties, and covenants made by us in any agreement filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are made solely for the benefit of the parties to the agreement, including, in some cases, for the purpose of allocating risk among the parties to the agreement, and should not be deemed to be representations, warranties, or covenants to or with any other parties. Moreover, these representations, warranties, or covenants should not be relied upon as accurately describing or reflecting the current state of our affairs.
ii
Organization
Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc., which changed its name to Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. effective, which was formerly known as Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. prior to July 20, 2017, (which may be referred to as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) was organized as a Maryland corporation on January 9, 2007 and has elected to be taxed, and currently qualifies, as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.
We were formed primarily to acquire and operate commercial real estate and real estate-related assets on an opportunistic and value-add basis. In particular, we have and expect to continue to focus generally on acquiring commercial properties with significant possibilities for capital appreciation, such as those requiring development, redevelopment, or repositioning, those located in markets and submarkets with high growth potential, and those available from sellers who are distressed or face time-sensitive deadlines. We have and expect to continue to acquire a wide variety of commercial properties, including office, industrial, retail, hospitality, and multifamily. We have and expect to continue to purchase existing, income-producing properties, and newly-constructed properties. Additionally, we have and may continue to invest in other real estate related investments, such as mortgage and mezzanine loans. We currently intend to hold our various real properties until such time as our board of directors determines that a sale or other disposition appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until it appears that the objectives will not be met. From our inception throughWe currently have one operating segment. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we have made an aggregate of 22had eight real estate investments including the origination of a mezzanine(five wholly owned properties and a mortgage loan. With respect to these 22three properties consolidated through investments we have cumulatively disposed of 15 investments through December 31, 2017, including the repayment of the mortgagein joint ventures) and mezzanine loans that we originated. Additionally, during 2013 we sold eight of the nine medical office buildings which comprised our Florida MOB Portfolio investment. We will not count the sale of these eight medical office buildings as the disposition of anone real estate-related investment until we sell the remaining medical office building, the Gardens Medical Pavilion, which was part of the Florida MOB Portfolio.(mezzanine loan).
Substantially all of our business is conducted through Behringer Harvard OpportunityLightstone REIT V OP II LP, a limited partnership organized in Delaware (the “Operating Partnership”). As of December 31, 2017,2020, our wholly-owned subsidiary, BHO II, Inc., a Delaware corporation, owned a 0.1% partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. As of December 31, 2017,2020, our wholly-owned subsidiary, BHO Business Trust II, a Maryland business trust, was the sole limited partner of the Operating Partnership and owned the remaining 99.9% interest in the Operating Partnership.
Subject to the oversight of our board of directors, ourOur business has beenis managed by an external advisor since the commencement of our initial public offering and we have no employees. From January 4, 2008 throughEffective February 10, 2017, an affiliate of Stratera Services, LLC, formerly known as “Behringer Harvard Holdings, LLC” (“Behringer”), acted as our external advisor (the “Behringer Advisor”). On February 10, 2017, we terminated our engagement of Behringer Advisor and engaged affiliates of The Lightstone Group, LLC (“Lightstone”), LSG-BH II Advisor LLC and LSG Development Advisor LLC (collectively, the “Advisor”), to provide advisory services to us. Our external advisorLightstone is majority owned by the chairman of our board of directors, David Lichtenstein. Pursuant to the terms of an advisory agreement and subject to the oversight of our board of directors, the Advisor is responsible for managing our day-to-day affairs and for services related to our acquisition, financing and disposition activities.
Our office is located at 1985 Cedar Bridge Avenue, Suite 1, Lakewood, New Jersey 08701 and our toll-free telephone number is (888) 808-7348.
Public Offerings of Common Stock
We commenced an initial public offering of our common stock on January 21, 2008 (the "Initial Offering"), including shares offered pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRP”). On July 3, 2011, the Initial Offering terminated in accordance with its terms. On July 5, 2011, we commenced a follow-on public offering of our common stock (the "Follow-On Offering"), including shares offered pursuant to our DRP. We terminated the primary component of the Follow-On Offering effective March 15, 2012 and the DRP component effective April 3, 2012. We raised gross offering proceeds of approximately $265.3 million from the sale of approximately 26.7 million shares under the Offerings, including shares sold under the DRP.
In connection with our initial capitalization, we issued 22,47122,500 shares of our common stock and 1,000 shares of our convertible stock to Behringerour previous advisor on January 19, 2007. Behringer transferred itsThe 1,000 shares of convertible stock were transferred to onean affiliate of its affiliatesLightstone on April 2, 2010.
As of April 2012, when we terminated the offering, we had issued 26.7 million shares of our common stock, including 22,471 shares owned by BehringerFebruary 10, 2017 and 2.2 million shares issued through the DRP.remain outstanding. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had redeemed 2.1 million shares of our common stock and had 24.620.2 million shares of common stock outstanding. As of December 31, 2017, we had 1,000 shares of convertible stock outstanding held by an affiliate of Lightstone, which shares were transferred from Behringer on February 10, 2017.
Our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange. The timing of a liquidity event for our stockholders will depend upon then prevailing market conditions. WeOur board of directors previously targeted June 30, 2023 as the commencement of a liquidity event, within six years after the termination of our initial public offering, which occurredhowever, on July 3, 2011. On June 29, 2017,January 9, 2020, our board of directors elected to extend the targeted timeline an additional six years until June 30, 20232028 based on their assessment of our investment objectives and liquidity options for our stockholders. However, weWe can provide no assurances as to the actual timing of the commencement of a liquidity event for our stockholders or theour ultimate liquidation of the Company.liquidation. We will seek stockholder approval prior to liquidating our entire portfolio.
20172020 Highlights
During 2017,2020, we completed the following key transactions:
On | ||
Gardens Medical Pavilion. Additionally, approximately $1.8 million of the remaining proceeds were distributed to the noncontrolling member. |
On | ||
Autumn Breeze Apartments Loan bears interest at 3.39% and requires monthly interest-only payments through June 30, 2023 and monthly principal and interest payments of approximately $0.1 million thereafter, through its stated maturity. The Autumn Breeze Apartments Loan is collateralized by the Autumn Breeze Apartments. |
● | On June 26, 2020, we and the noncontrolling member entered into a 10-year, $35.7 million non-recourse mortgage loan (the "Lakes of Margate Loan") scheduled to mature on July 1, 2030. The Lakes of Margate Loan bears interest at LIBOR + 2.98% and requires monthly interest-only payments through the first four years of the term and thereafter, monthly payments of principal and interest based upon a 30-year amortization schedule. The Lakes of Margate Loan is collateralized by the Lakes of Margate. Additionally, approximately $1.4 million of the financing proceeds were distributed to the noncontrolling member. |
For further information regarding our consolidated real estate properties, see Item 2. Additionally, see Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information related to subsequent events during the period from January 1, 2021 through the date of this filing.
Investment Objectives
Our primary investment objectives are:
to realize growth in the value of our investments; and |
● | generate income without subjecting our investors’ capital contribution to undue risk. |
Investment Policies
We have and expect to continue to invest in commercial properties, such as office, industrial, retail, hospitality, multifamily, and student housing, and other real estate-related investments such as mortgage loans and mezzanine loans. Our investments may be in existing income-producing properties and newly-constructed properties that are initially identified as opportunistic and value-add investments with significant possibilities for capital appreciation due to their property-specific characteristics or their market characteristics.
We have disposed of 15 of our original portfolio assets through December 31, 2017, including the repayment of the mortgage and mezzanine loans that we previously originated.
We have and expect to continue to generally make our real estate investments in fee title or a long-term leasehold estate through the Operating Partnership or indirectly through special purpose limited liability companies or through investments in joint ventures, partnerships, co-tenancies, or other co-ownership arrangements with the developers of the properties or other persons.
Borrowing Policies
There is no limitation on the amount we may invest in or borrow related to any single property or other investment. Under our charter, the maximum amount of our indebtedness cannot exceed 300% of our “net assets” (as defined by the Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts adopted by the North American Securities Administrators Association on May 7, 2007) as of the date of any borrowing; however, we may exceed that limit if approved by a majority of our independent directors. In addition to our charter limitation, our board of directors has adopted a policy to generally limit our aggregate borrowings to approximately 75% of the aggregate value of our assets unless substantial justification exists that borrowing a greater amount is in our best interests. Our board of directors must review our aggregate borrowings at least quarterly. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had an aggregate debt leverage ratio of approximately 38.1%62.4% of the aggregate value of our assets.
Disposition Policies
As each of our investments reaches what we believe to be the asset’s optimum value during the expected life of the program, we will consider disposing of the investment and may do so for the purpose of reinvesting the net sales proceeds into real estate and real estate-related investments, distributing the net sale proceeds to our stockholders or satisfying our obligations. A property may be sold before or after the expected holding period if, in the judgment of our Advisor and our independent board, the sale of the property is determined to be in our best interest and the best interests of the Company and itsour stockholders.
Distribution Policy
We made an election to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2008. U.S. federal tax law requires a REIT to distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP) determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. In order to continue to qualify for REIT status, we may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available. Distributions, if any, are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors based on their analysis of our performance over the previous periods and expectations of performance for future periods. Such analyses may include actual and anticipated operating cash flow, capital expenditure needs, general financial and market conditions, proceeds from asset sales and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant. Our board of directors’ decisions will be substantially influenced by their obligation to ensure that we maintain our federal tax status as a REIT. We cannot provide assurance that we will pay distributions at any particular level, or at all.
Prior to 2012, our board of directors declared distributions on a quarterly basis based on daily record dates, portions of which were paid on a monthly basis. During the first quarter of 2012, our board of directors determined to cease regular, monthly distributions in favor of payment of periodic special distributions.
Since 2012,During 2014 and 2015, our board of directors has declared a total of $77.1 million, or $3.00 per share of common stock, in special cash distributions, all of which were paid to stockholders during 2014, 2015, and 2016. These special cash distributions were paid with a portion of proceeds from asset sales. We did not make anyNo special cash distributions during 2017.have been declared or paid since 2016.
Competition
We are subject to significant competition in seeking tenants for the leasing of our properties and buyers for the potential sale of our properties. The competition for creditworthy tenants is intense, and we have been required to provide rent concessions, incur charges for tenant improvements, and provide other inducements in order to lease vacant space at our properties. Without these inducements, we may not be able to continue to lease vacant space timely, or at all, which would adversely impact our results of operations. We also compete with sellers of similar properties when we sell properties, which may result in our receiving lower proceeds from the sale of our properties or not being able to sell our properties at prices that will achieve our original return objectives. We compete for buyers and tenants with many third parties engaged in real estate investment activities, including other REITs, specialty finance companies, savings and loan associations, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, lenders, hedge funds, governmental bodies, and other entities. Many of our competitors, including larger REITs, have greater financial resources than we have and generally may be able to accept more risk. They also may enjoy competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies.
Regulations
Our investments are subject to various federal, state and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, including, among other things, zoning regulations, land use controls, environmental controls relating to air and water quality, noise pollution, and indirect environmental impacts such as increased motor vehicle activity. We believe that we have all permits and approvals necessary under current law to operate our investments.
COVID-19 Pandemic
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic leading many countries, including the United States, particularly at the individual state level, to subsequently impose various degrees of restrictions and other measures, including, but not limited to, mandatory temporary closures, quarantine guidelines, limitations on travel, and “shelter in place” rules in an effort to reduce its duration and the severity of its spread. Although the COVID-19 pandemic has continued to evolve, most of these previously imposed restrictions and other measures have now been reduced and/or lifted. However, the COVID-19 pandemic remains highly unpredictable and dynamic and its duration and extent is likely dependent on numerous developments such as the regulatory approval, mass production, administration and ultimate effectiveness of vaccines, as well as the timeline to achieve a level of sufficient herd immunity amongst the general population. Accordingly, the COVID-19 pandemic may continue to have negative effects on the overall health of the U.S. economy for the foreseeable future.
Our consolidated portfolio of properties currently consists of seven multi-family apartment complexes and one student housing complex. Despite past and current restrictions and mitigation strategies, our multi-family properties still have not yet seen any significant impact from the COVID-19 pandemic. Our student housing complex, which consists of the River Club Apartments and the Townhomes at River Club, are located in Athens, Georgia and principally serve as “off-campus” lodging for students attending the University of Georgia (“UGA”). Leases for the River Club Apartments and Townhomes at River Club generally have a term of one year running from August through July. UGA previously transitioned to online instruction during its Spring 2020 semester and for its other course offerings throughout the summer. However, UGA returned to “on-campus” classes beginning with its Fall 2020 semester and has continued “on-campus” classes into the current Spring 2021 semester. Our student housing complex is located “off-campus” and therefore, our tenants are not required to vacate even if UGA does not conduct “on-campus” classes. However, if UGA decides to return to online instruction for its students in lieu of ��on-campus” classes in future semesters, it could adversely impact leasing demand, occupancy levels and the operating results of our student housing complex in future periods. Additionally, our note receivable relates to a condominium development project located in New Yok City (the “Condominium Project”), which is subject to similar restrictions and risks. To date, our note receivable has not been significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
While our business has not yet seen any material impact from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the extent to which we may be affected in future periods will largely depend on both current and future developments, all of which are highly uncertain and cannot be reasonably predicted.
If our properties and real estate-related investments are negatively impacted in future periods for an extended period because (i) tenants are unable to pay their rent, (ii) demand for its student housing complex declines, and (iii) our borrower is unable to pay scheduled debt service on the outstanding note receivable; our business and financial results could be materially and adversely impacted.
Environmental
As an owner of real estate, we are subject to various environmental laws of federal, state, and local governments. Compliance with existing laws has not had a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, and management does not believe it will have such an impact in the future. However, we cannot predict the impact of unforeseen environmental contingencies or new or changed laws or regulations on properties in which we hold an interest.
Employees
We have no employees. Our Advisor and its affiliates perform a full range of real estate services for us, including asset management, accounting, legal, and property management, andas well as investor relations services.
We are dependent on the Advisor and its affiliates for services that are essential to us, including asset management and acquisition, disposition and financing activities, and other general administrative responsibilities. If these companies were unable to provide these services to us, we would be required to provide the services ourselves or obtain the services from other sources.
Financial
4
Available Information About Industry Segments
Our current business consists of owning, managing, operating, leasing, developing, investing in, and disposing of real estate and real estate-related investments. We internally evaluate all of our real estate investments as one reportable segment, and, accordingly, we do not report segment information.
Available Information
We electronically filesubmit various filings to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) including our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports with the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We also have filed with the SEC registration statements in connection with the Offerings.reports. Copies of our filings with the SEC may be obtained from our website atwww.lightstonecapitalmarkets.com or at the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov. Access to these filings is free of charge. We are not incorporating our website or any information from the website into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The factors described below represent the principal risks of an investment in our shares and that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements. Other factors may exist that we do not consider significant based on information that is currently available or that we are not currently able to anticipate. Our stockholders may be referred to as “you” or “your” in this Item 1A. “Risk Factors” section.
Risks Related to an Investment in Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. (formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)
There currently is no public trading market for our shares; therefore, it may be difficult for you to sell your shares. If you are able to sell your shares, you may have to sell them at a substantial discount from our estimated net asset value per common share (“NAV per Share”).
There currently is no public market for our shares and our charter does not require our board of directors to provide liquidity to our stockholders by a specified date, or at all. In addition, if you are able to sell your shares, the price you receive for the sale of any shares of our common stock is likely to be less than the estimated NAV per Share.
Therefore, it will be difficult for you to sell your shares promptly or at all. You may not be able to sell your shares in the event of an emergency, and, if you are able to sell your shares, you may have to sell them at a substantial discount from the estimated NAV per Share. It is also likely that your shares would not be accepted as the primary collateral for a loan.
We may not successfully implement an exit strategy, in which case you may have to hold your investment for an indefinite period.
Our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange. The timing of a liquidity event for our stockholders will depend upon then prevailing market conditions. We previously targeted the commencement of a liquidity event within six years after the termination of our initial public offering, which occurred on July 3, 2011. On June 29, 2017, our board of directors elected to extend the targeted timeline an additional six years until June 30, 2023 based on their assessment of our investment objectives and liquidity options for our stockholders.
As a result, if we do not begin the process of liquidating (or listing our shares on a national securities exchange) by June 2023, our charter requires that we hold a stockholders meeting to vote on a proposal for our orderly liquidation unless a majority of our board of directors and a majority of our independent directors vote to defer the meeting.
Market conditions and other factors could cause our board of directors and our independent directors to conclude that it is not in our best interests to hold a stockholders meeting for the purpose of voting on a proposal for our orderly liquidation in 2023. Our charter permits our board of directors, with the concurrence of a majority of our independent directors, to defer such a stockholder vote indefinitely. Therefore, if we are not successful in implementing an exit strategy, your shares will continue to be illiquid and you may, for an indefinite period of time, be unable to convert your investment into cash easily with minimum loss.
The estimated NAV per Share of our common stock may not reflect the actual value that stockholders may ultimately receive for their investment.
On December 4, 2017, pursuant to the Policy for Estimation of Common Stock Value (the “Estimated Valuation Policy”), our board of directors determined and approved our estimated NAV of approximately $198.7 million and resulting estimated NAV per Share of $7.98, based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding, all as of September 30, 2017, as described under “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities-Market Information” included in Part II, Item 5.
The estimated NAV per Share was based upon consultation with our external advisor and an independent, third-party valuation advisory firm engaged by us, using what the board of directors deemed to be appropriate valuation methodologies and assumptions under current circumstances in accordance with the Estimated Valuation Policy.
As with any valuation methodology, the methodology used to determine our estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share is based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may prove later not to be accurate or complete. Further, different participants with different property-specific and general real estate and capital market assumptions, estimates, judgments and standards could derive a different estimated NAV per Share, which could be significantly different from the estimated NAV per Share approved by our board of directors. The estimated NAV per Share approved by our board of directors does not represent the fair value of our assets and liabilities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, and such estimated NAV per Share is not a representation, warranty or guarantee that:
The Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Labor do not provide any guidance on the methodology an issuer must use to determine its estimated NAV per share. FINRA guidance provides that NAV valuations be derived from a methodology that conforms to standard industry practice.
Our estimated NAV per Share is based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities and other non-controlling interests divided by the number of our diluted shares of common stock outstanding, all as of the date indicated. Our estimated NAV per Share does not reflect a discount for the fact we are externally managed, nor does it reflect a real estate portfolio premium/discount versus the sum of the individual property values. Our estimated NAV per Share does not take into account estimated disposition costs or fees or penalties, if any, that may apply upon the prepayment of certain of our debt obligations or the impact of restrictions on the assumption of certain debt. Our estimated NAV per Share will fluctuate over time as a result of, among other things, future acquisitions or dispositions of assets, developments related to individual assets and the management of those assets and changes in the real estate and capital markets. Markets for real estate and real estate-related investments can fluctuate and values are expected to change in the future. Our Estimated Valuation Policy requires us to update our estimated NAV per Share value on at least an annual basis. Our board of directors will review and approve each estimate of NAV and resulting estimated NAV per Share.
The following factors may cause a stockholder not to ultimately realize distributions per share of common stock equal to the estimated NAV per Share upon liquidation:
For a full description of the methodologies used to value our assets and liabilities in connection with the calculation of the NAV per Share, see Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities - Market Information.”
Because we rely on affiliates of Lightstone for advisory and property management services, if Lightstone, or its majority owner, is unable to meet its obligations, we may be required to find alternative providers for these services, which could result in a significant and costly disruption of our business.
David Lichtenstein, the chairman of our board of directors, is the majority owner of Lightstone, and directly or indirectly owns the Advisor and our property manager. The operations of the Advisor and our property manager rely substantially on Mr. Lichtenstein and on Lightstone. Lightstone and its majority owner are dependent on fee income from their other sponsored real estate programs. Any real estate market disruptions could adversely affect the amount of such fee income. If Lightstone or its majority owner become unable to meet their obligations as they become due, we might be required to find alternative service providers, which could result in a significant disruption of our business and would likely adversely affect the value of your investment in us.
If we lose or are unable to retain key personnel, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered.
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of certain executive officers and other key personnel, of us, the Advisor and its affiliates, each of whom would be difficult to replace. We do not directly employ our executive officers and other key personnel, and we cannot guarantee that they will remain affiliated with us. Also, our executive officers and key personnel do not all have employment agreements with the Advisor, and we cannot guarantee that such persons will remain affiliated with the Advisor. We do not separately maintain key person life insurance on any of our key personnel.
Further, we believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon the Advisor’s and its affiliates’ ability to hire and retain highly skilled managerial and operational personnel. Competition for persons with these skills is intense, and we cannot assure you that the Advisor will be successful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel.
We are restricted in our ability to replace our property manager, an affiliate of the Advisor.
Under the terms of our property management agreement, we may terminate the agreement upon 30 days’ notice in the event of, and only in the event of, a showing of willful misconduct, gross negligence, or deliberate malfeasance by the property manager in performing its duties. Our board of directors may find the performance of our property manager to be unsatisfactory. However, unsatisfactory performance by the property manager may not constitute “willful misconduct, gross negligence, or deliberate malfeasance.” As a result, we may be unable to terminate the property management agreement, which may have an adverse effect on the management and profitability of our properties.
Payment of fees and reimbursement of expenses to the Advisor and its affiliates will reduce cash available for investment and may adversely affect the return on your investment.
The Advisor and its affiliates will perform services for us in connection with the management and leasing of our properties, the administration of our other investments and the acquisition, disposition and financing of our assets. They will be paid substantial fees for these services. In addition, we reimburse our Advisor a fee for expenses it incurs with respect to administrative services pursuant to the terms of the advisory agreement. These fees and expense reimbursements will reduce the amount of cash available for investment and may adversely affect the return on your investment.
Our stockholders may not be able to sell their shares under our share redemption program and, if our stockholders are able to sell their shares under the program, they may not be able to recover the amount of their investment in our shares.
Our board of directors has adopted a share redemption program that permits stockholders to sell their shares back to us, subject to the significant conditions and limitations of the program. Our board of directors can amend the provisions of our share redemption program without the approval of our stockholders. The terms on which we redeem shares may differ between Ordinary Redemptions and Exceptional Redemptions. From April 1, 2012 to May 15, 2014 our board of directors suspended accepting Ordinary Redemptions. Although our board of directors has resumed considering Ordinary Redemption requests, the cash available for redemptions (Ordinary and Exceptional) is limited to no more than $10.0 million in any twelve-month period. Our board of directors may determine to suspend accepting redemptions at any time, and we can provide no assurances that the $10.0 million of funds available for redemptions will be sufficient to honor all redemption requests submitted.
Any shares approved for redemption will be redeemed on a periodic basis as determined from time to time by our board of directors, and no less frequently than annually. We will not redeem, during any twelve-month period, more than 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the twelve-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption. Further, we have no obligation to redeem shares if the redemption would violate the restrictions on distributions under Maryland law, which prohibits distributions that would cause a corporation to fail to meet statutory tests of solvency. The redemption limitations apply to all redemptions, whether Ordinary or Exceptional Redemptions. These limits may prevent us from accommodating all redemption requests made in any year or for a specific redemption date.
Under our share redemption program, the purchase price per share for the redeemed shares submitted as an Ordinary Redemption and an Exceptional Redemption will equal the lesser of 80% and 90%, respectively, of:
On December 4, 2017, our board of directors approved an estimated NAV per Share of $7.98 as of September 30, 2017. For a full description of the methodologies and assumptions used to value our assets and liabilities in connection with the calculation of the estimated NAV per Share, see Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities - Market Information.” The value of our shares will fluctuate over time in response to developments related to individual assets in our portfolio and the management of those assets and in response to the real estate and finance markets. As such, the estimated NAV per Share does not take into account developments in our portfolio since December 4, 2017.
We currently expect to engage our Advisor and/or an independent valuation firm to update our estimated NAV per Share annually. Upon updating our estimated NAV per Share, the redemption price per share will also change. Because of the restrictions of our share redemption program, our stockholders may not be able to sell their shares under the program, and if stockholders are able to sell their shares, depending upon the then current redemption price, they may not recover the amount of their investment in us.
Risks Related to Our Business
We are uncertain of our sources for funding of future capital needs, which could adversely affect the value of our investments.
Our ability to fund future property capital needs, such as tenant improvements, leasing commissions, and capital expenditures, will depend on our ability to borrow, to sell assets or interests in assets, and to generate additional cash flows from operations. We will establish capital reserves on a property-by-property basis, as we deem appropriate. In addition to any reserves we establish, a lender may require escrow of capital reserves in excess of our established reserves. If these reserves are insufficient to meet our cash needs, we may have to obtain financing from either affiliated or unaffiliated sources to fund our cash requirements. Accordingly, in the event that we develop a need for additional capital in the future for the improvement of our properties or for any other reason, we have not identified any sources for such funding, and we cannot assure you that such sources of funding will be available to us for potential capital needs.
Market disruptions may adversely impact aspects of our operating results and operating condition.
Our business may be affected by adverse market and economic challenges experienced by the U.S. and global economies or the real estate industry as a whole or by the local economic conditions in the markets which our properties are located. These conditions may materially affect the value and performance of our properties, and may affect our ability to pay cash distributions, the availability or the terms of financing that we have or may anticipate utilizing, and our ability to make principal and interest payments on, or refinance, any outstanding debt when due. These challenging economic conditions may also impact the ability of certain of our tenants to enter into new leasing transactions or satisfy rental payments under existing leases. Specifically, global market disruptions may have many consequences including, but not limited to, these listed below:
Disruptions in the financial markets and adverse economic conditions in the geographic regions where our properties are located could adversely affect the value of our investments.
Market volatility will likely make the valuation of our investment properties more difficult. There may be significant uncertainty in the valuation, or in the stability of the value, of our properties that could result in a substantial decrease in the value of our properties. As a result, we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of our properties, and we may be required to recognize impairment charges, which will reduce our reported earnings.
If our Advisor were to waive or defer certain fees due to them, our results of operations may be artificially high.
Our Advisor may agree to waive or defer all or a portion of the acquisition, asset management or other fees, compensation or incentives due to them, pay general administrative expenses, or otherwise supplement stockholder returns in order to increase the amount of cash available to support our operations. As a result, our earnings may be artificially higher than normal and could be misleading in years when our Advisor waives or defers such fees and incentives.
Your interest in us will be diluted if we or the Operating Partnership issues additional securities.
Stockholders do not have preemptive rights to any shares issued by us in the future. Our charter currently has authorized 400,001,000 shares of capital stock, of which 350,000,000 shares are designated as common stock, 1,000 shares are designated as convertible stock and 50,000,000 are designated as preferred stock. Subject to any limitations set forth under Maryland law, our board of directors may amend our charter to increase the number of authorized shares of capital stock, increase or decrease the number of shares of any class or series of stock designated, and may classify or reclassify any unissued shares without the necessity of obtaining stockholder approval. Shares will be issued in the discretion of our board of directors. Stockholders will likely experience dilution of their equity investment in us in the event that we: (i) sell shares of our common stock in the future; (ii) sell securities that are convertible into shares of our common stock; (iii) issue shares of our common stock in a private offering of securities to institutional investors; (iv) issue shares of common stock upon the conversion of our convertible stock; (v) issue shares of common stock upon the exercise of any options granted to our independent directors or employees of our advisor or property manager and an affiliate of our advisor or property manager or their affiliates; (vi) issue shares to our advisor, its successors or assigns, in payment of an outstanding fee obligation as set forth under our advisory management agreement; or (vii) issue shares of our common stock to sellers of properties acquired by us in connection with an exchange of limited partnership interests of the Operating Partnership. In addition, the partnership agreement for the Operating Partnership contains provisions that allow, under certain circumstances, other entities to merge into or cause the exchange or conversion of their interest for interests of the Operating Partnership. Because the limited partnership interests of the Operating Partnership may be exchanged for shares of our common stock, any merger, exchange or conversion between the Operating Partnership and another entity ultimately could result in the issuance of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, thereby diluting the percentage ownership interest of other stockholders.
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
We are subject to conflicts of interest arising out of our relationships with the Advisor and its affiliates, including the material conflicts discussed below.
The Advisor and its affiliates, including our affiliated director and any executive officer who is also an employee of the Advisor or its affiliates, will face conflicts of interest caused by their compensation arrangements with us, which could result in actions that are not in the long-term best interests of our stockholders.
Our Advisor and its affiliates and our property manager, are entitled to substantial fees from us under the terms of the advisory management agreement and property management agreement. These fees could influence our Advisor’s advice to us, as well as the judgment of affiliates of our Advisor performing services for us. Among other matters, these compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to:
The fees the external advisor have or will receive in connection with transactions involving the purchase and management of an asset are based on the value of the investment, and not based on the quality of the investment or the quality of the services rendered to us. This may have or may influence the Advisor to recommend riskier transactions to us.
Our affiliated director and our officers face conflicts of interest related to the positions they hold with Lightstone and with entities affiliated with Lightstone, which could diminish the value of the services they provide to us.
Our affiliated director and certain of our executive officers are also officers of Lightstone and other entities affiliated with Lightstone, including the advisors and fiduciaries to other Lightstone-sponsored programs. As a result, these individuals owe duties to these other entities and their investors, which may conflict with the duties that they owe to us and our stockholders. Their loyalties to these other entities and investors could result in action or inaction that is detrimental to our business, which could harm the implementation of our business strategy and our investment and leasing opportunities. Conflicts with our business and interests are most likely to arise from involvement in activities related to (i) allocation of management time and services between us and the other entities, and (ii) the timing and terms of the sale of an asset. If we do not successfully implement our business strategy, we may be unable to maintain or increase the value of our assets and the overall return on your investment may be reduced.
The key personnel that conduct our day-to-day operations will face competing demands on their time, and this may cause our investment returns to suffer.
We rely upon our executive officers and the employees of our Advisor and its affiliates to conduct our day-to-day operations. These persons also conduct the day-to-day operations of other Lightstone-sponsored programs and may have other business interests as well. Because these persons have competing interests on their time and resources, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and these other activities. During times of intense activity in other programs and ventures, they may devote less time and resources to our business than is necessary or appropriate. If this occurs, the returns on our investments may suffer.
General Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate
Our opportunistic and value-add property-acquisition strategy involved a higher risk of loss than more conservative investment strategies.
Our strategy for acquiring properties has and may continue to involve the acquisition of properties in markets that are depressed or overbuilt, and/or have high growth potential in real estate lease rates and sale prices. As a result of our investment in these types of markets, we may face increased risks relating to changes in local market conditions and increased competition for similar properties in the same market, as well as increased risks that these markets will not recover and the value of our properties in these markets will not increase, or will decrease, over time. For these and other reasons, we cannot assure you that we will be profitable or that we will realize growth in the value of our real estate properties, and as a result, your overall investment return may be adversely affected. Our approach to acquiring and operating income-producing properties involves more risk than comparable real estate programs that may have a targeted holding period for investments that is longer than ours, utilize leverage to a lesser degree and/or employ more conservative investment strategies.
Our revenue and net income may vary significantly from one period to another due to opportunity oriented investments, which could increase the variability of our cash available to support our operations.
Our opportunistic and value-add property investment strategy has and may continue to include investments in properties in various phases of development, redevelopment or repositioning, which may cause our revenues and net income to fluctuate significantly from one period to another. Projects do not produce revenue while in development or redevelopment. During any period when our projects in development or redevelopment or those with significant capital requirements increase without a corresponding increase in stable revenue-producing properties, our revenues and net income will likely decrease. Many factors may have a negative impact on the level of revenues or net income produced by our portfolio of properties and projects, including higher than expected construction costs, failure to complete projects on a timely basis, failure of the properties to perform at expected levels upon completion of development or redevelopment, and increased borrowings necessary to fund higher than expected construction or other costs related to the project. Further, our net income and shareholders’ equity could be negatively affected during periods with large portfolio investments, which generally require large cash outlays and may require the incurrence of additional financing. Any such reduction in our revenues and net income during such periods could cause a resulting decrease in our cash available to support our operations during the same periods.
Our operating results are affected by economic and regulatory changes that have an adverse impact on the real estate market in general, and we cannot assure you that we will be profitable or that we will be able to sustain or enhance the value of our real estate properties.
Our operating results are subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate, including:
For these and other reasons, we cannot assure you that we will be profitable or that we will be able to sustain or enhance the value of our real estate properties.
If our investment portfolio lacks diversification, downturns relating to certain geographic regions, types of assets, industries or business sectors may have a more significant adverse impact on our assets and your overall investment return than if we had a diversified investment portfolio.
We are not required to observe specific diversification criteria. Therefore, our investments in target assets may be concentrated in certain asset types that are subject to higher risk of foreclosure, or secured by assets concentrated in a limited number of geographic locations or industries. To the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in limited geographic regions, types of assets, industries or business sectors, downturns relating generally to such region, type of asset, industry or business sector may leave our profitability vulnerable to a downturn in such areas as a result of tenants defaulting on their lease obligations at a number of our properties within a short time period, which may reduce our earnings and our NAV per Share and accordingly reduce our stockholders’ overall return.
Properties that have significant vacancies could be difficult to sell, which could diminish the return on your investment.
A property may incur vacancies either by the continued default of tenants under their leases or the expiration of tenant leases. If vacancies continue for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues. In addition, the value of the property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property.
Many of our investments are or may be dependent on tenants for revenue; lease expirations and terminations could adversely affect our operations and your overall investment return.
The success of our real property investments often are or will be materially dependent on the occupancy rates of our properties and the financial stability of our tenants. If we are unable to renew or extend significant expiring leases at our medical office building under similar terms or are unable to negotiate new leases, or if our tenants default on lease payments, it could negatively impact our liquidity and consequently adversely affect our ability to fund our ongoing operations. A default by a significant tenant on its lease payments to us would cause us to lose the revenue associated with such lease and cause us to have to find an alternative source of revenue to meet mortgage payments and prevent a foreclosure. In the event of a tenant default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-letting our property. If significant leases are terminated, we cannot assure you that we will be able to lease the property for the rent previously received or sell the property without incurring a loss. Additionally, any loans that we make generally will relate to real estate. As a result, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be dependent on the financial stability of the tenants leasing the related real estate.
We may be unable to sell a property if or when we decide to do so, which could adversely impact our cash flow and results of operations.
We currently intend to hold the various real properties in which we invest until such time as we determine that a sale or other disposition appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until it appears that such objectives will not be met. We have no obligation to sell properties at any particular time, except upon our liquidation. If we do not begin the process of liquidating our assets or listing our shares by June 2023, our charter requires that we hold a stockholders meeting to vote on a proposal for our orderly liquidation unless a majority of our board of directors and a majority of our independent directors vote to defer such a meeting beyond June 2023. Market conditions and other factors could cause our board of directors and our independent directors to conclude that it is not in our best interests to hold a stockholders meeting for the purpose of voting on a proposal for our orderly liquidation in 2023. Therefore, if we are not successful in implementing an exit strategy, your shares will continue to be illiquid and you may, for an indefinite period of time, be unable to convert your investment into cash easily with minimum loss.
The real estate market is affected, as discussed above, by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand, that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any asset for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of an asset. If we are unable to sell an asset when we determine to do so, it could have a significant adverse effect on our cash flow and results of operations.
Our co-venture partners, co-tenants or other partners in co-ownership arrangements could take actions that decrease the value of an investment to us and lower your overall return.
We have or may enter into joint ventures with third parties for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties.
Such investments have or may involve risks not otherwise present with other forms of real estate investment, including, for example:
Any of the above might subject a property to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and thus reduce our returns on that investment.
Uninsured losses relating to real property or excessively expensive premiums for insurance coverage may adversely affect your returns.
Our Advisor attempts to ensure that all of our properties are adequately insured to cover casualty losses. The nature of the activities at certain properties we have invested in, such as student housing, will expose us and our operators to potential liability for personal injuries and property damage claims. In addition, there are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, pollution, environmental matters or extreme weather conditions such as hurricanes, floods and snowstorms that are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Insurance risks associated with potential terrorist acts could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Mortgage lenders generally insist that specific coverage against terrorism be purchased by commercial property owners as a condition for providing mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans. It is uncertain whether such insurance policies will be available, or available at reasonable cost, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our properties. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. We cannot assure you that we will have adequate coverage for such losses. In the event that any of our properties incurs a casualty loss that is not fully covered by insurance, the value of our assets will be reduced by the amount of any such uninsured loss. In addition, other than the capital reserve or other reserves we may establish, we have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured damaged property, and we cannot assure you that any such sources of funding will be available to us for such purposes in the future. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large amounts for insurance, we could suffer reduced earnings that may adversely affect the overall return on your investment.
Our operating results may be negatively affected by potential development and construction delays and result in increased costs and risks, which could diminish the return on your investment.
We have or may invest in the acquisition, development and/or redevelopment of properties upon which we, or a borrower, will develop and construct improvements. We could incur substantial capital obligations in connection with these types of investments. We may be subject to risks relating to uncertainties associated with rezoning for development and environmental concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups and our builder’s ability to control construction costs or to build in conformity with plans, specifications and timetables. The builder’s failure to perform may necessitate legal action by us to rescind the purchase or the construction contract or to compel performance. Performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond the builder’s control. Delays in completion of construction could also give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases for space at a newly developed project. We may incur additional risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to such builders prior to completion of construction. These and other such factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we may be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. Furthermore, we must rely upon projections of rental income and expenses and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price to be paid for the property at the time of acquisition of the property. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property, and the return on our investment could suffer.
If we set aside insufficient capital reserves, we may be required to defer necessary capital improvements.
If we do not have enough capital reserves to supply needed funds for capital improvements throughout the life of the investment in a property, and there is insufficient cash available from our operations, we may be required to defer necessary improvements to the property, which may cause the property to suffer from a greater risk of obsolescence or a decline in value, or a greater risk of decreased cash flow as a result of fewer potential tenants being attracted to the property. If this happens we may not be able to maintain projected rental rates for affected properties, and our results of operations may be negatively impacted.
Our student-housing properties are subject to an annual leasing cycle, short lease-up period, seasonal cash flows, changing university admission and housing policies, and other risks inherent in the student-housing industry, any of which could have a negative impact on your investment.
Student-housing properties generally have short-term leases of 12 months, ten months, nine months, or shorter. As a result, we may experience significantly reduced cash flows during the summer months from student-housing properties while most students are on vacation. Furthermore, student-housing properties must be almost entirely re-leased each year, exposing us to increased leasing risk. Student-housing properties are also typically leased during a limited leasing season that usually begins in August and ends in June of the following year. We would, therefore, be highly dependent on the effectiveness of our marketing and leasing efforts and personnel during this season.
Changes in university admission policies could also adversely affect us. For example, if a university reduces the number of student admissions or requires that a certain class of students, such as freshman, live in a university-owned facility, the demand for units at our student-housing properties may be reduced and our occupancy rates may decline. We rely on our relationships with colleges and universities for referrals of prospective student residents or for mailing lists of prospective student residents and their parents. Many of these colleges and universities own and operate their own competing on-campus facilities. Any failure to maintain good relationships with these colleges and universities could therefore have a material adverse effect on our ability to market our properties to students and their families.
Federal and state laws require colleges to publish and distribute reports of on-campus crime statistics, which may result in negative publicity and media coverage associated with crimes occurring on or in the vicinity of any student-housing properties. Reports of crime or other negative publicity regarding the safety of the students residing on, or near, our student-housing properties may have an adverse effect on our business.
We may face significant competition from university-owned student housing and from other residential properties that are in close proximity to student-housing properties we own, which could have a negative impact on our results of operations.
On-campus student housing has certain inherent advantages over off-campus student housing in terms of physical proximity to the university campus and integration of on-campus facilities into the academic community. Colleges and universities can generally avoid real estate taxes and borrow funds at lower interest rates than us.
We have and may continue to invest in apartment communities with short-term apartment leases, which may expose us to the effects of declining market rent more quickly and could have a negative impact on our results of operations.
Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term of one year or less. Because these leases generally permit the residents to leave at the end of the lease term without penalty, our rental revenues may be impacted by declines in market rents more quickly than if our leases were for longer terms.
We face competition from other apartment communities and the increased affordability of single-family homes, which may limit our profitability and returns to our stockholders.
The apartment communities we have and may acquire most likely compete with numerous housing alternatives in attracting residents, including other apartment communities, as well as single family homes and condominiums available to rent or purchase.
The residential apartment community industry is highly competitive. This competition could reduce occupancy levels and revenues at our apartment communities, which would adversely affect our operations. We expect to face competition from many sources, including from other apartment communities both in the immediate vicinity and the broader geographic market where our apartment communities are located. Overbuilding of apartment communities may occur. If so, this will increase the number of apartment units available and may decrease occupancy and apartment rental rates. In addition, increases in operating costs due to inflation may not be offset by increased apartment rental rates. We may be required to expend substantial sums to attract new residents.
We face increased competition from single-family homes and condominiums for rent or purchase, which could limit our ability to retain residents, lease apartment units or increase or maintain rents at our apartment communities.
The apartment communities we have or may invest in may compete with numerous housing alternatives in attracting residents, including single-family homes and condominiums available for rent or purchase. Such competitive housing alternatives may become more prevalent in a particular area because of the tightening of mortgage lending underwriting criteria, homeowner foreclosures, the decline in single-family home and condominium sales, and the lack of available credit. The number of single-family homes and condominiums for rent in a particular area could limit our ability to retain residents, lease apartment units, or increase or maintain rents.
In addition, the increasing affordability of single-family homes and condominiums available to purchase caused by low mortgage interest rates and government programs to promote home ownership could adversely affect our ability to retain our residents, lease apartment units and increase or maintain rental rates.
Our property manager’s failure to integrate its subcontractors into its operations in an efficient manner could reduce the return on your investment.
Our property manager may rely on multiple subcontractors for on-site property management of our properties. If our property manager is unable to integrate these subcontractors into its operations in an efficient manner, our property manager may have to expend substantial time and money coordinating with these subcontractors, which could be a negative impact on the revenues generated from such properties.
We are dependent on third-party managers if we acquire hotel properties.
In order to qualify as a REIT, we are unable to operate a hotel property or participate in the decisions affecting the daily operations of a hotel. We would lease any hotels we acquire to a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) in which we would own a 100% interest. Our TRS would enter into a management agreement with an eligible independent contractor that is not our subsidiary or otherwise controlled by us to manage the hotel. Thus, an independent hotel operator, under a management agreement with our TRS, would control the daily operations of any hotel we acquire.
We would depend on the independent management company to adequately operate any hotel we would acquire as provided for in a management agreement. We would not have the authority to require hotels we acquire to be operated in a particular manner or to govern any particular aspect of the daily operations of the hotel (for instance, setting room rates). Thus, even if we believe a hotel is being operated inefficiently or in a manner that does not result in satisfactory occupancy rates, average daily rates (“ADR”), and resulting revenue per available room (“RevPar”), we may not be able to force the management company to change its method of operation of the hotel. We can only seek redress if a management company violates the terms of the applicable management agreement with the TRS, and then only to the extent of the remedies provided for under the terms of the management agreement. In the event that we need to replace a management company, we may be required by the terms of the management agreement to pay substantial termination fees and may experience significant disruptions at the hotel.
We may have to make significant capital expenditures to maintain any hotels we acquire.
Hotels have an ongoing need for renovations and other capital improvements, including replacements of furniture, fixtures and equipment. Generally, we would be responsible for the costs of these capital improvements, which give rise to the following risks:
If we have insufficient cash flow from operations to fund needed capital expenditures, then we would need to borrow to fund future capital improvements.
General economic conditions and discretionary consumer spending may affect any hotel property we acquire and lower the return on your investment.
The operations of a hotel property in which we invest, depend upon a number of factors relating to discretionary consumer spending. Unfavorable local, regional or national economic developments or uncertainties regarding future economic prospects as a result of terrorist attacks, military activity or natural disasters could reduce consumer spending in the market in which we own a hotel property and adversely affect its operations. Consumer spending on luxury goods, travel and other leisure activities such as boating, skiing and health and spa activities may decline as a result of lower consumer confidence levels, even if prevailing economic conditions are favorable. In an economic downturn, consumer discretionary spending levels generally decline, at times resulting in disproportionately large reductions in expenditures on luxury goods, travel and other leisure activities. Our hotel may be unable to maintain its profitability during periods of adverse economic conditions or low consumer confidence, which could in turn affect the ability of the operator to make scheduled rent payments to us.
Seasonal revenue variations at any hotel property we acquire would require the operator to manage cash flow properly over time to meet its non-seasonal scheduled rent payments to us.
Most hotel properties are seasonal in nature. As a result of the seasonal nature, the hotel could experience seasonal variations in revenues that may require the operator to supplement revenue at the hotel in order to be able to make scheduled rent payments to us. The failure of an operator to manage its cash flow properly may result in the operator having insufficient cash on hand to make its scheduled payments to us during seasonally slow periods, which may adversely affect our cash flow from operations.
Adverse weather conditions at hotels we acquire may affect its operations or reduce our operators’ ability to make scheduled rent payments to us, which could reduce our cash flow from the hotel.
Adverse weather conditions may influence revenues at hotel investments. These adverse weather conditions might include hurricanes, tropical storms, high winds, heat waves, drought (or merely reduced rainfall levels), excessive rain and floods. For example, adverse weather could reduce the number of people that visit hotel properties. Hotel properties may be susceptible to damage from weather conditions such as hurricanes, which damage (including but not limited to property damage and loss of revenue) is not generally insurable at commercially reasonable rates. Poor weather conditions could also disrupt operations at hotel properties and could adversely affect both the value of our investments and the ability of our operators to make their scheduled rent payments to us.
Security breaches through cyber-attacks, cyber-intrusions, or otherwise, could disrupt our IT networks and related systems.
Risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber-attacks or cyber-intrusions over the Internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to e-mails, or otherwise, against persons inside our organization, persons with access to systems inside our organization, the U.S. government, financial markets or institutions, or major businesses, including tenants, could disrupt or disable networks and related systems, other critical infrastructures, and the normal operation of business. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attack or cyber-intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments, and cyber-terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity, and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Even though we may not be specifically targeted, cyber-attacks on the U.S. government, financial markets, financial institutions, or other major businesses, including tenants, could disrupt our normal business operations and networks, which may in turn have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our information technology (“IT”) networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations and they are subject to cybersecurity risks and threats. They also may be critical to the operations of certain of our tenants. Further, our Advisor provides our IT services, and there can be no assurance that their security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. It has been reported that unknown entities or groups have mounted cyber-attacks on businesses and other organizations solely to disable or disrupt computer systems, disrupt operations and, in some cases, steal data. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems, and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted security breaches evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Due to the nature of cyber-attacks, breaches to our systems could go unnoticed for a prolonged period of time. These cybersecurity risks could disrupt our operations and result in downtime, loss of revenue, or the loss of critical data as well as result in higher costs to correct and remedy the effects of such incidents. If our systems for protecting against cyber incidents or attacks prove to be insufficient and an incident were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. While, to date, we have not experienced a cyber-attack or cyber-intrusion, neither our Advisor nor we may be able to anticipate or implement adequate security barriers or other preventive measures. A security breach or other significant disruption involving our IT networks and related systems could:
Any or all of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
The costs of compliance with environmental laws and other governmental laws and regulations may adversely affect our income.
All real property and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous materials, and the remediation of contamination associated with disposals. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on tenants, owners or operators for the costs of investigation or remediation of contaminated properties, regardless of fault or the legality of the original disposal. In addition, the presence of these substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent such property or to use the property as collateral for future borrowing.
Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require material expenditures by us. For example, various federal, regional and state laws and regulations have been implemented or are under consideration to mitigate the effects of climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions. Among other things, “green” building codes may seek to reduce emissions through the imposition of standards for design, construction materials, water and energy usage and efficiency, and waste management. We are not aware of any such existing requirements that we believe will have a material impact on our current operations. However, future requirements could increase the costs of maintaining or improving our existing properties or developing new properties.
Discovery of previously undetected environmentally hazardous conditions may adversely affect our operating results.
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations (including those of foreign jurisdictions), a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. The costs of removal or remediation could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances.
In addition, when excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Concern about indoor exposure to mold has been increasing, as exposure to mold may cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold at any of our projects could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold from the affected property or development project, which would reduce our operating results.
The cost of defending against claims of liability, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements, of remediating any contaminated property, or of paying personal injury claims could materially adversely affect our business, assets or results of operations and, consequently, amounts available for distributions to stockholders.
We must comply with the Fair Housing Amendment Act, with respect to our investments in apartment communities, which may decrease our cash flow from operations.
We must comply with the Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988 (“FHAA”), which requires that apartment communities first occupied after March 13, 1991 be accessible to handicapped residents and visitors. Compliance with the FHAA could require removal of structural barriers to handicapped access in a community, including the interiors of apartment units covered under the FHAA. Recently, there has been heightened scrutiny of multifamily housing communities for compliance with the requirements of the FHAA and an increasing number of substantial enforcement actions and private lawsuits have been brought against apartment communities to ensure compliance with these requirements. Noncompliance with the FHAA could result in the imposition of fines, awards of damages to private litigants, payment of attorneys’ fees and other costs to plaintiffs, substantial litigation costs and substantial costs of remediation.
Risks Associated with Debt Financing
We incur mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which increases our business risks.
We have and currently expect to continue to acquire real properties and other real estate-related investments by using either existing financing or borrowing new funds. We also may borrow funds for payment of cash distributions to stockholders, in particular if necessary to satisfy the requirement that we distribute to stockholders at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income, or otherwise as is necessary or advisable to assure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and/or avoid federal income tax.
There is no limitation on the amount we may invest in or borrow related to any single property or other investment. Under our charter, the maximum amount of our indebtedness shall not exceed 300% of our “net assets” (as defined in our charter) as of the date of any borrowing; however, we may exceed that limit if approved by a majority of our independent directors.
In addition to our charter limitation, our board of directors has adopted a policy to generally limit our aggregate borrowings to approximately 75% of the aggregate value of our assets unless substantial justification exists that borrowing a greater amount is in our best interests. Our policy limitation, however, does not apply to individual real estate assets. For these purposes, the value of our assets is based on methodologies and policies determined by the board of directors and may include, but do not require, independent appraisals.
We have not and do not intend to incur mortgage debt on a particular real property unless we believe the property’s projected cash flow is sufficient to service the mortgage debt. However, if there is a shortfall in cash flow available to service our mortgage debt, then our cash flow from operations will be adversely affected. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss because (i) loss in investment value is generally borne entirely by the borrower until such time as the investment value declines below the principal balance of the associated debt and (ii) defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in foreclosure actions initiated by lenders and our loss of the property securing the loan that is in default. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but would not receive any cash proceeds from the foreclosure. We may give full or partial guarantees to lenders of mortgage debt to the entities that own our properties. When we give a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity. If any mortgages contain cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, there is a risk that more than one real property may be affected by a default. If any of our properties are foreclosed upon due to a default, your overall investment return will be adversely affected.
If mortgage debt is unavailable at reasonable rates, we may not be able to refinance our properties, which could reduce the overall return on your investment.
When we place mortgage debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance the properties when the loans come due, or of being unable to refinance on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when the properties are refinanced, we may not be able to finance the properties at reasonable rates and our income could be reduced. If this occurs, it would reduce the overall return on your investment, and it may prevent us from borrowing more money.
Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make cash distributions to our stockholders.
In connection with obtaining financing, a lender could impose restrictions on us that affect our ability to incur additional debt, to make distributions and operating policies. In general, we expect our loan agreements to restrict our ability to encumber or otherwise transfer our interest in the respective property without the prior consent of the lender. Loan documents we enter may contain other customary negative covenants that may limit our ability to further mortgage the property, discontinue insurance coverage, replace our Advisor or impose other limitations. Any such restriction or limitation may have an adverse effect on our operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Interest-only indebtedness may increase our risk of default and ultimately may reduce our funds available for cash distribution to our stockholders.
We have and expect to continue to finance certain of our property acquisitions using interest-only mortgage indebtedness. During the interest-only period, the amount of each scheduled payment will be less than that of a traditional amortizing mortgage loan. The principal balance of the mortgage loan will not be reduced (except in the case of prepayments) because there are no scheduled monthly payments of principal during this period. After the interest-only period, we will be required either to make scheduled payments of amortized principal and interest or to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. These required principal or balloon payments will increase the amount of our scheduled payments and may increase our risk of default under the related mortgage loan. If the mortgage loan has an adjustable interest rate, the amount of our scheduled payments also may increase at a time of rising interest rates. Increased payments and substantial principal or balloon maturity payments will reduce the funds available for cash distribution to our stockholders because cash otherwise available for distributions will be required to pay principal and interest associated with these mortgage loans.
Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect the overall return on your investment.
We have and expect to continue to incur indebtedness that bears interest at a variable rate. In addition, from time to time we may pay mortgage loans or finance and refinance our properties in a rising interest rate environment. Accordingly, increases in interest rates could increase our interest costs, which could have an adverse effect on our operating cash flow. In addition, if rising interest rates cause us to need additional capital to repay indebtedness in accordance with its terms or otherwise, we may need to liquidate one or more of our investments at times that may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments. Prolonged interest rate increases could also negatively impact our ability to make investments with positive economic returns.
Financing arrangements involving balloon payment obligations may adversely affect the overall return on your investment.
Some of our financing arrangements require us to make a lump-sum or balloon payment at maturity. Our ability to make a balloon payment at maturity is uncertain and may depend upon our ability to obtain additional financing or our ability to sell the property. At the time the balloon payment is due, we may not be able to refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. The effect of a refinancing or sale could affect the rate of return to stockholders and the projected time of disposition of our assets. In addition, payments of principal and interest made to service our debts may leave us with insufficient cash to pay the distributions that we are required to pay to maintain our qualification as a REIT and/or avoid federal income tax. Any of these results would have a significant, negative impact on your investment.
The lender on our 22 Exchange loan (outstanding balance of approximately $19.0 million as of December 31, 2017) elected to sweep the cash from operations for this property beginning in January 2018 because we did not meet the required debt service coverage ratio for any of the quarters during 2017. Additionally, the cash from operations was not sufficient to fully pay the scheduled monthly debt service due on January 5, 2018, which constituted an event of default and therefore, the 22 Exchange loan which was scheduled to mature in May 2023 is now due on demand. We received notice on January 9, 2018 that the 22 Exchange loan had been transferred to a special servicer effective immediately. Subsequently, the special servicer placed the property in receivership and commenced foreclosure proceedings. However, we believe the loss of cash flow and the expected loss of this property will not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
In addition to the 22 Exchange loan, as of March 16, 2018, the Company had aggregate balloon payments totaling approximately $56.6 million associated with (i) River Club and the Townhomes at River Club ($23.4 million due at scheduled maturity date of May 1, 2018), (ii) Parkside ($9.6 million due at scheduled maturity date of June 1, 2018) and (iii) Arbors Harbor Town ($23.6 million due at maturity date of January 1, 2019) maturing over the next twelve months.
We have broad authority to incur debt, and high debt levels could decrease the value of your investment.
Our board of directors has adopted a policy to generally limit our aggregate borrowings to approximately 75% of the aggregate value of our assets, but we may exceed this limit under some circumstances. Such debt may be at a level that is higher than real estate investment trusts with similar investment objectives or criteria. High debt levels could cause us to incur higher interest charges, could result in higher debt service payments, and could be accompanied by restrictive covenants. These factors could result in a decline in the value of your investment.
Risks Associated with Investments in Mortgage, Bridge and Mezzanine Loans
Mezzanine loans may be impacted by unfavorable real estate market conditions, which could decrease the value of the loan and the return on your investment.
We have and may continue to invest in mezzanine loans and we may be at risk of defaults on the loans caused by many conditions beyond our control, including local and other economic conditions affecting real estate values and interest rate levels. We do not know whether the value of the property securing any loan will remain at the levels existing on the date we complete the underwriting of the loan. If the value of an underlying property declines, our risk will increase because of the lower value of the security associated with the loan.
Our mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans will be subject to interest rate fluctuations, which could reduce our returns as compared to market interest rates and reduce the value of the loans in the event we sell them.
We have and may continue to invest in fixed-rate, long-term mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans. If interest rates rise, the loans could yield a return lower than then-current market rates. If interest rates decrease, we would be adversely affected to the extent that mortgage, bridge or mezzanine loans are prepaid, because we may not be able to make new loans at the previously higher interest rate. If we invest in variable-rate loans and interest rates decrease, our revenues also decrease. When interest rates increase on our variable-rate loans, the value of the loans we own at such time would decrease, which would lower the proceeds we would receive in the event we sell such assets. For these reasons, our returns on these types of loans and the value of your investment will be subject to fluctuations in interest rates.
Delays in liquidating a defaulted mezzanine loan could reduce our investment returns.
If there is a default under a mezzanine loan, we may not be able to repossess and quickly sell the property securing the loan. The resulting time delay could reduce the value of the investment in the defaulted loan. An action to foreclose on a property securing a loan is regulated by state statutes and regulations and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of any lawsuit brought in connection with the foreclosure if the defendant raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a mortgagor, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the mortgaged property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the loan.
The mezzanine loans in which we may invest involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income-producing real properties.
We have and may continue to invest in mezzanine loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the real property or the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the real property. This type of investment involves a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income producing real property because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. Further, the borrower of these loans may be a real estate developer, and the investment may involve additional risks, including dependence for repayment on successful completion and operation of the project, difficulties in estimating construction or rehabilitation costs and loan terms that often require little or no amortization. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of the entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our loan or on debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our loan would be satisfied only after the senior debt is paid in full. Where debt senior to our loan exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements may limit our ability to amend our loan documents, assign our loans, accept prepayments, exercise our remedies (through “standstill periods”), and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment.
Foreclosures create additional ownership risks that could adversely impact our returns on mortgage investments.
If we acquire property by foreclosure following a default under a mezzanine loan, we will have the economic and liability risks as the owner.
The liquidation of our assets may be delayed as a result of our investment in mezzanine loans, which could delay cash distributions to our stockholders.
Mezzanine loans we may originate are particularly illiquid investments due to their short life, unsuitability for securitization and greater difficulty of recoupment in the event of a borrower’s default. Any intended liquidation of us may be delayed beyond the time of the sale of all of our properties until the mezzanine loans expire or are sold.
Risks Related to Our Operations
To hedge against exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations, we may use derivative financial instruments that may be costly and ineffective and may reduce the overall returns on your investment and affect cash available for distributions to our stockholders.
We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in exchange rates and interest rates on loans secured by our assets. Derivative instruments may include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap or floor contracts, futures or forward contracts, options or repurchase agreements. Our actual hedging decisions will be determined in light of the facts and circumstances existing at the time of the hedge and may differ from time to time. Our hedging may fail to protect or could adversely affect us because, among other things:
Any hedging activity we engage in may adversely affect our earnings, which could adversely affect cash available for distributions to our stockholders. Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to reduce interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged or liabilities being hedged may vary materially. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the interest rate risk sought to be hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended accounting treatment and may expose us to risk of loss.
To the extent that we use derivative financial instruments to hedge against exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations, we will be exposed to credit risk, basis risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. Basis risk occurs when the index upon which the contract is based is more or less variable than the index upon which the hedged asset or liability is based, thereby making the hedge less effective. Finally, legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks, including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract. If we are unable to manage these risks effectively, our results of operations, financial condition and your overall investment return will be adversely affected.
Hedging instruments often are not traded on regulated exchanges, guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house, or regulated by any U.S. or foreign governmental authorities and involve risks and costs.
The cost of using hedging instruments increases as the period covered by the instrument increases and during periods of rising and volatile interest rates. We may increase our hedging activity and thus increase our hedging costs during periods when interest rates are volatile or rising and hedging costs have increased. In addition, hedging instruments involve risk since they often are not traded on regulated exchanges, guaranteed by an exchange or its clearing house, or regulated by any U.S. or foreign governmental authorities. Consequently, there are no requirements with respect to record keeping, financial responsibility or segregation of customer funds and positions. Furthermore, the enforceability of agreements underlying derivative transactions may depend on compliance with applicable statutory, commodity and other regulatory requirements and, depending on the identity of the counterparty, applicable international requirements. The business failure of a hedging counterparty with whom we enter into a hedging transaction will most likely result in a default. Default by a party with whom we enter into a hedging transaction may result in the loss of unrealized profits and force us to cover our resale commitments, if any, at the then current market price. It may not always be possible to dispose of or close out a hedging position without the consent of the hedging counterparty, and we may not be able to enter into an offsetting contract in order to cover our risk. We cannot be certain that a liquid secondary market will exist for hedging instruments purchased or sold, and we may be required to maintain a position until exercise or expiration, which could result in losses.
Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively.
The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”) may limit our ability to hedge our assets and operations. Under these provisions, any income that we generate from transactions intended to hedge our interest rate, inflation and/or currency risks will be excluded from gross income for purposes of the REIT 75% and 95% gross income tests if the instrument hedges (i) interest rate risk on liabilities incurred to carry or acquire real estate; (ii) risk of currency fluctuations with respect to any item of income or gain that would be qualifying income under the REIT 75% or 95% gross income tests; or (iii) to manage risk with respect to the termination of prior hedging transactions described in (i) and/or (ii) above, and in each case, such instrument is properly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations. Income from hedging transactions that do not meet these requirements will generally constitute nonqualifying income for purposes of both the REIT 75% and 95% gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may have to limit our use of hedging techniques that might otherwise be advantageous, which could result in greater risks associated with interest rate or other changes than we would otherwise incur.
There can be no assurance that the direct or indirect effects of the Dodd-Frank Act and other applicable non-U.S. regulations will not have an adverse effect on our interest rate hedging activities.
Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) imposed additional regulations on derivatives markets and transactions. Such regulations and, to the extent we trade with counterparties organized in non-US jurisdictions, any applicable regulations in those jurisdictions, are still being implemented, and will affect our interest rate hedging activities. While the full impact of the regulation on our interest rate hedging activities cannot be fully assessed until all final rules and regulations are implemented, such regulation may affect our ability to enter into hedging or other risk management transactions, may increase our costs in entering into such transactions, and/or may result in us entering into such transactions on less favorable terms than prior to implementation of such regulation. For example, but not by way of limitation, the Dodd-Frank Act and the rulemaking thereunder provides for significantly increased regulation of the derivative transactions used to affect our interest rate hedging activities, including: (i) regulatory reporting, (ii) subject to an exemption for end-users of swaps upon which we and our subsidiaries generally rely, mandated clearing of certain derivatives transactions through central counterparties and execution on regulated exchanges or execution facilities and, (iii) to the extent we are required to clear any such transactions, margin and collateral requirements. The imposition, or the failure to comply with, any of the foregoing requirements may have an adverse effect on our business and our stockholders’ return.
Potential reforms to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could adversely affect us.
There is significant uncertainty surrounding the futures of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Through their lender originator networks, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are significant lenders to buyers of multifamily real estate. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have a mandate to support multifamily housing through their financing activities and any changes to their mandates, further reductions in their size or the scale of their activities, or loss of their key personnel could have a significant impact on us and may, among other things, adversely affect values for multifamily assets, interest rates, capital availability, and potential sales of multifamily communities which in turn could adversely affect our ability to dispose of our multifamily assets. Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s regulator has set overall volume limits on most of Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s lending activities. The regulator in the future could require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to focus more of their lending activities on small borrowers or properties the regulator deems affordable, which may or may not include our assets, which could also adversely impact us.
Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure
A limit on the number of shares a person may own may discourage a takeover.
Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Unless exempted by our board of directors, no person may own more than 9.8% of our outstanding shares of common or preferred stock. This restriction may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might otherwise provide stockholders with the opportunity to receive a control premium for their shares.
Our charter permits our board of directors to issue stock with terms that may subordinate the rights of the holders of our current common stock or discourage a third party from acquiring us.
Our charter permits our board of directors to issue up to 400,001,000 shares of capital stock. Our board of directors, without any action by our stockholders, may (i) increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares, (ii) increase or decrease the number of shares of any class or series we have authority to issue, or (iii) classify or reclassify any unissued common stock or preferred stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications, or terms or conditions of redemption of any such stock. Thus, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of such stock with terms and conditions that could subordinate the rights of the holders of our current common stock or have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock.
Maryland law prohibits certain business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us to be acquired.
Under Maryland law, “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange, or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested stockholder is defined as:
A person is not an interested stockholder under the statute if the board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which he/she otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, the board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the board.
After the expiration of the five-year period described above, any business combination between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder must generally be recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the corporation’s common stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares. Maryland law also permits various exemptions from these provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by the board of directors before the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. The business combination statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
Maryland law also limits the ability of a third party to buy a large stake in us and exercise voting power in electing directors.
Maryland law provides a second anti-takeover statute, the Control Share Acquisition Act, which provides that “control shares” of a Maryland corporation acquired in a “control share acquisition” have no voting rights except to the extent approved by the corporation’s disinterested stockholders by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares of stock owned by interested stockholders, that is, by the acquirer, by officers or by directors who are employees of the corporation, are excluded from the vote on whether to accord voting rights to the control shares. “Control shares” are voting shares of stock that would entitle the acquirer to exercise voting power in electing directors within specified ranges of voting power. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval. A “control share acquisition” means the acquisition of control shares. The control share acquisition statute does not apply to (i) shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction or (ii) acquisitions approved or exempted by a corporation’s charter or bylaws. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share Acquisition Act any and all acquisitions by any person of shares of our stock. We can offer no assurance that this provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future. This statute could have the effect of discouraging offers from third parties to acquire us and increasing the difficulty of successfully completing this type of offer by anyone other than our affiliates or any of their affiliates.
Our charter includes an anti-takeover provision that may discourage a stockholder from launching a tender offer for our shares.
Our charter provides that any tender offer made by a stockholder, including any “mini-tender” offer, must comply with most provisions of Regulation 14D of the Exchange Act. The offering stockholder must provide us notice of such tender offer at least ten business days before initiating the tender offer. If the offering stockholder does not comply with these requirements, we will have the right to redeem that stockholder’s shares and any shares acquired in such tender offer. In addition, the non-complying stockholder shall be responsible for all of our expenses in connection with that stockholder’s noncompliance. This provision of our charter may discourage a stockholder from initiating a tender offer for our shares and prevent a stockholder from receiving a premium price for his shares in such a transaction.
Stockholders have limited control over changes in our policies and operations.
Our board of directors determines our major policies, including our policies regarding financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of the stockholders. Under our charter and the Maryland General Corporation Law, our stockholders currently have a right to vote only on the following matters:
All other matters are subject to the discretion of our board of directors.
Our board of directors may change our investment policies and objectives generally and at the individual investment level without stockholder approval, which could alter the nature of your investment.
Our charter requires that our independent directors review our investment policies at least annually to determine that the policies we are following are in the best interests of the stockholders. In addition to our investment policies and objectives, we may also change our stated strategy for any investment in an individual property. These policies may change over time. The methods of implementing our investment policies may also vary, as new investment techniques are developed. Our investment policies, the methods for their implementation, and our other objectives, policies and procedures may be altered by our board of directors without the approval of our stockholders. As a result, the nature of your investment could change without your consent.
Our rights and the rights of our shareholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited.
Maryland law provides that a director or officer has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, our charter eliminates our directors’ and officers’ liability to us and our shareholders for money damages except for liability resulting from actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment and which is material to the cause of action. In addition, our charter requires us to indemnify our directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law for liability actually incurred in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be made, a party, except to the extent that the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was either committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services, or, in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. As a result, we and our shareholders may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors and officers.
Federal Income Tax Risks
Failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect our operations and our ability to make cash distributions.
In order for us to qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy certain requirements set forth in the Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulations and various factual matters and circumstances that are not entirely within our control. We intend to structure our activities in a manner designed to satisfy all of these requirements. However, if certain of our operations were to be recharacterized by the Internal Revenue Service, such recharacterization could jeopardize our ability to satisfy all of the requirements for qualification as a REIT and may affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT. In addition, new legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly change the tax laws with respect to qualifying as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of qualifying.
Our qualification as a REIT depends upon our ability to meet, through investments, actual operating results, distributions and satisfaction of specific stockholder rules, the various tests imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. We cannot assure you that we will satisfy the REIT requirements in the future. If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income for that year at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT status. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer qualify for the dividends-paid deduction, and we would no longer be required to make distributions. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax. Our failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect the return on your investment.
Qualification as a REIT is subject to the satisfaction of tax requirements and various factual matters and circumstances that are not entirely within our control. New legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of being a REIT. Our failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect your return on your investment.
Our investment strategy may cause us to incur penalty taxes, lose our REIT status, or own and sell properties through taxable REIT subsidiaries, each of which would diminish the return to our stockholders.
In light of our opportunistic and value-add investment strategy and our current disposition strategy, it is possible that one or more sales of our properties may be considered “prohibited transactions” under the Internal Revenue Code. Any subdivision of property, such as the sale of condominiums, would almost certainly be considered such a prohibited transaction. If we are deemed to have engaged in a “prohibited transaction” (i.e., we sell a property held by us primarily for sale in the ordinary course of our trade or business) all net income that we derive from such sale would be subject to a 100% penalty tax. The Internal Revenue Code sets forth a safe harbor for REITs that wish to sell property without risking the imposition of the 100% penalty tax. A principal requirement of the safe harbor is that the REIT must hold the applicable property for not less than two years prior to its sale. Given our opportunistic and value-add investment strategy, along with our current disposition strategy, the sale of one or more of our properties may not fall within the prohibited transaction safe harbor.
If we desire to sell a property pursuant to a transaction that does not fall within the safe harbor, we may be able to avoid the 100% penalty tax if we acquired the property through a TRS or acquired the property and transferred it to a TRS for a non-tax business purpose prior to the sale (i.e., for a reason other than the avoidance of taxes). However, there may be circumstances that prevent us from using a TRS in a transaction that does not qualify for the safe harbor. Additionally, even if it is possible to effect a property disposition through a TRS, we may decide to forgo the use of a TRS in a transaction that does not meet the safe harbor, based on our own internal analysis, the opinion of counsel or the opinion of other tax advisors that the disposition will not be subject to the 100% penalty tax. In cases where a property disposition is not effected through a TRS, the Internal Revenue Service could successfully assert that the disposition constitutes a prohibited transaction, in which event all of the net income from the sale of such property will be payable as a tax and none of the proceeds from such sale will be distributable by us to our stockholders or available for investment by us.
If we acquire a property that we anticipate will not fall within the safe harbor from the 100% penalty tax upon disposition, then we may acquire such property through a TRS in order to avoid the possibility that the sale of such property will be a prohibited transaction and subject to the 100% penalty tax. If we already own such a property directly or indirectly through an entity other than a TRS, we may contribute the property to a TRS if there is another, non-tax related business purpose for the contribution of such property to the TRS. Following the transfer of the property to a TRS, the TRS will operate the property and may sell such property and distribute the net proceeds from such sale to us, and we may distribute the net proceeds distributed to us by the TRS to our stockholders. Though a sale of the property by a TRS likely would eliminate the danger of the application of the 100% penalty tax, the TRS itself would be subject to a tax at the federal level, and potentially at the state and local levels, on the gain realized by it from the sale of the property, as well as on the income earned while the property is operated by the TRS. In addition, the REIT has to pay a 100% penalty tax on some payments that it receives or on some deductions taken by a TRS if the economic arrangements between the REIT, the REIT’s customers, and the TRS are not comparable to similar arrangements between unrelated parties. This tax obligation would diminish the amount of the proceeds from the sale of such property that would be distributable to our stockholders. As a result, the amount available for distribution to our stockholders would be substantially less than if the REIT had not operated and sold such property through the TRS and such transaction was not successfully characterized as a prohibited transaction. The maximum federal corporate income tax rate currently is 35%. Federal, state and local corporate income tax rates may be increased in the future, and any such increase would reduce the amount of the net proceeds available for distribution by us to our stockholders from the sale of property through a TRS after the effective date of any increase in such tax rates.
As a REIT, the value of the non-mortgage securities we hold in all of our TRSs may not exceed 25% (20% for taxable years after 2017) of the value of all of our assets at the end of any calendar quarter. If the Internal Revenue Service were to determine that the value of our interests in all of our TRSs exceeded this limit at the end of any calendar quarter, then we would fail to qualify as a REIT. If we determine it to be in our best interests to own a substantial number of our properties through one or more TRSs, then it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service may conclude that the value of our interests in our TRSs exceeds 25% (or 20%, as applicable) of the value of our total assets at the end of any calendar quarter and therefore cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT. Additionally, as a REIT, no more than 25% of our gross income with respect to any year may be from sources other than real estate. Distributions paid to us from a TRS are considered to be non-real estate income. Therefore, we may fail to qualify as a REIT if distributions from all of our TRSs, when aggregated with all other non-real estate income with respect to any one year, are more than 25% of our gross income with respect to such year. We will use all reasonable efforts to structure our activities in a manner intended to satisfy the requirements for our continued qualification as a REIT. Our failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect the return on your investment.
Certain fees paid to us may affect our REIT status.
Income received in the nature of fees or noncustomary services, in some cases, may not qualify as rental income and could be characterized by the Internal Revenue Service as non-qualifying income for purposes of satisfying the “income tests” required for REIT qualification. If this income were, in fact, treated as non-qualifying, and if the aggregate of such income and any other non-qualifying income in any taxable year ever exceeded 5% of our gross revenues for such year, we could lose our REIT status for that taxable year and the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT status. We will use commercially reasonable efforts to structure our activities in a manner intended to satisfy the requirements for our continued qualification as a REIT. Our failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect the return on your investment.
If our operating partnership fails to maintain its status as a partnership, its income may be subject to taxation, which would reduce the cash available to us for distributions to our stockholders.
We intend to maintain the status of the Operating Partnership as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. However, if the Internal Revenue Service were to successfully challenge the status of the operating partnership as an entity taxable as a partnership, the Operating Partnership would be taxable as a corporation. In such event, this would reduce the amount of distributions that the operating partnership could make to us. This could also result in our losing REIT status, and becoming subject to a corporate level tax on our income. This would substantially reduce the cash available to us to make distributions and the return on your investment. In addition, if any of the partnerships or limited liability companies through which the operating partnership owns its properties, in whole or in part, loses its characterization as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, it would be subject to taxation as a corporation, thereby reducing distributions to the operating partnership. Such a recharacterization of an underlying property owner could also threaten our ability to maintain REIT status.
In certain circumstances, we may be subject to federal, state and foreign taxes, which would reduce our cash available for distributions to our stockholders.
Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may become subject to federal and state taxes, including alternative minimum tax (“AMT”). In addition, we may be subject to foreign taxes on our investments. For example, if we have net income from a “prohibited transaction,” such income will be subject to a 100% penalty tax. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. We may also decide to retain income we earn from the sale or other disposition of our assets and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. We may also be subject to state and local taxes, including potentially the “margin tax” in the State of Texas, on our income or property, either directly or at the level of the operating partnership or at the level of the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets. Any federal, state or foreign taxes paid by us will reduce the cash available to us for distributions to our stockholders.
Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect the returns to our investors.
In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of the federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in shares of our common stock. Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur, and we cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of a stockholder. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets. You are urged to consult with your own tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation on your investment in our shares and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our shares. You also should note that our counsel’s tax opinion is based upon existing law and Treasury Regulations, applicable as of the date of its opinion, all of which are subject to change, either prospectively or retroactively.
Distributions that we make to our taxable stockholders out of current and accumulated earnings and profits (and not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income) generally will be taxable as ordinary income. For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, noncorporate stockholders are entitled to a 20% deduction with respect to these ordinary REIT dividends which would, if allowed in full, result in a maximum effective federal income tax rate on them of 29.6% (or 33.4% including the 3.8% surtax on net investment income). However, a portion of our distributions may (1) constitute a return of capital generally to the extent that they exceed our accumulated earnings and profits as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (2) be designated by us as capital gain dividends generally taxable as long-term capital gain to the extent that they are attributable to net capital gain recognized by us, or (3) be designated by us as qualified dividend income, taxable at capital gains rates, generally to the extent they are attributable to dividends we receive from our TRSs. A return of capital is not taxable, but has the effect of reducing the basis of a stockholder’s investment in our Common Shares. Distributions that exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits and a stockholder’s tax basis in our common stock generally will be taxable as capital gain.
As a REIT, we generally would not be subject to federal or state corporate income taxes on that portion of our ordinary income or capital gain that we distribute currently to our stockholders, and we thus expect to avoid the “double taxation” to which other corporations are typically subject. It is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that invests in real estate to elect to be taxed for federal income tax purposes as a corporation. As a result, our charter provides our board of directors with the power, under certain circumstances, to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election and cause us to be taxed as a corporation, without the vote of our stockholders. Our board of directors has fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders and could only cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in the best interests of our stockholders.
Equity participation in mortgage, bridge, mezzanine or other loans may result in taxable income and gains from these properties that could adversely impact our REIT status.
If we participate under a loan in any appreciation of the properties securing the mortgage loan or its cash flow and the Internal Revenue Service characterizes this participation as “equity,” we might have to recognize income, gains and other items from the property for federal income tax purposes. This could affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.
Our investments in debt instruments may cause us to recognize“phantom income”for federal income tax purposes even though no cash payments have been received on the debt instruments.
We may acquire debt instruments in the secondary market for less than their face amount. The amount of such discount will generally be treated as “market discount” for federal income tax purposes. We may acquire distressed debt investments that are subsequently modified by agreement with the borrower. If the amendments to the outstanding debt are “significant modifications” under the applicable Treasury regulations, the modified debt may be considered to have been reissued to us in a debt-for-debt exchange with the borrower. This deemed reissuance may prevent the modified debt from qualifying as a good REIT asset if the underlying security has declined in value.
In general, we will be required to accrue original issue discount on a debt instrument as taxable income in accordance with applicable federal income tax rules even though no cash payments may be received on such debt instrument.
In the event a borrower with respect to a particular debt instrument encounters financial difficulty rendering it unable to pay stated interest as due, we may nonetheless be required to continue to recognize the unpaid interest as taxable income. Similarly, we may be required to accrue interest income with respect to investments in commercial mortgage-backed securities at the stated rate regardless of when their corresponding cash payments are received.
As a result of these factors, there is a significant risk that we may recognize substantial taxable income in excess of cash available for distribution. In that event, we may need to borrow funds or take other action to satisfy the REIT distribution requirements for the taxable year in which this “phantom income” is recognized.
REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan.
We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP) determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain, in order to maintain our REIT qualification. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed REIT taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we pay out to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under federal tax laws. We intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.
From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our income for financial reporting purposes, or our taxable income may be greater than our cash flow available for distributions to stockholders (for example, where a borrower defers the payment of interest in cash pursuant to a contractual right or otherwise). If we do not have other funds available in these situations we could be required to borrow funds, sell investments at disadvantageous prices or find another alternative source of funds to make distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.
Risks Related to Investments by Benefit Plans Subject to ERISA and Certain Tax-Exempt Entities (including IRAs)
If the fiduciary of an employee pension benefit plan subject to ERISA (such as profit sharing, Section 401(k) or pension plan) or any other retirement plan or account fails to meet the fiduciary and other standards under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code as a result of an investment in our stock, you could be subject to criminal and civil penalties.
There are special considerations that apply to employee benefit plans subject to ERISA (such as profit sharing, section 401(k) or pension plans) and other retirement plans or accounts subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (such as an IRA) that are investing in our shares. If you are investing the assets of such a plan or account in our common stock, you should satisfy yourself that:
With respect to the annual valuation requirements described above, we currently expect to provide an estimated value for our shares annually. For information regarding our NAV per Share, see Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of equity Securities - Market Information” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We can make no claim whether such estimated value will or will not satisfy the applicable annual valuation requirements under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. The Department of Labor or the Internal Revenue Service may determine that a plan fiduciary or an IRA custodian is required to take further steps to determine the value of our common stock. In the absence of an appropriate determination of value, a plan fiduciary or an IRA custodian may be subject to damages, penalties or other sanctions.
Failure to satisfy the fiduciary standards of conduct and other applicable requirements of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code may result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties and could subject the fiduciary to claims for damages or for equitable remedies. In addition, if an investment in our shares constitutes a prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code, the fiduciary or IRA owner who authorized or directed the investment or a related party may be subject to the imposition of excise taxes with respect to the amount invested. In the case of a prohibited transaction involving an IRA owner, the IRA may be disqualified and all of the assets of the IRA may be deemed distributed and subjected to tax. ERISA plan fiduciaries and IRA custodians should consult with counsel before making an investment in our common shares.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not applicable.
General
The following table presents certain additional information about our consolidated investments in real estate as of December 31, 2017:2020:
Property Name | Location | Date Acquired | Approximate Rentable Square Footage or Number of Units and Beds | Description | Encumbrances (dollars in thousands) | Ownership Interest | Occupancy of 2017 | Occupancy as of the | Effective Monthly Rent per Square Foot/Unit/Bed for 2017(1) | Effective Monthly Rent per Square Foot/Unit/Bed for 2016(1) | Location | Date Acquired | Number of Units or Beds | Description | Encumbrances (dollars in thousands) | Ownership Interest | Occupancy as of the end of 2020 | Occupancy as of the end of 2019 | Effective Monthly Rent per Unit/Bed for 2020 (1) | Effective Monthly Rent per Unit/Bed for 2019 (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gardens Medical Pavillion | Palm Beach Gardens, Florida | October 20, 2010 | 75,374 sq ft | Medical office building | $ | - | 81.8 | % | 70 | % | 72 | % | $ | 2.20 | $ | 1.97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
River Club and the Townhomes at River Club(2) | Athens, Georgia | April 25, 2011 | 1,134 beds | Student housing | 23,511 | 85.0 | % | 95 | % | 98 | % | 507.98 | 401.68 | Athens, Georgia | April 25, 2011 | 1,134 beds | Student housing | $ | 30,359 | 85.0 | % | 95 | % | 96 | % | $ | 489.79 | $ | 462.39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lakes of Margate | Margate, Florida | October 19, 2011 | 280 units | Multifamily | 13,973 | 92.5 | % | 88 | % | 94 | % | 1,274.88 | 1,273.61 | Margate, Florida | October 19, 2011 | 280 units | Multifamily | $ | 35,700 | 92.5 | % | 95 | % | 95 | % | $ | 1,393.29 | $ | 1,429.69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arbors Harbor Town | Memphis, Tennessee | December 20, 2011 | 345 units | Multifamily | 24,153 | 94.0 | % | 92 | % | 94 | % | 1,299.08 | 1,213.26 | Memphis, Tennessee | December 20, 2011 | 345 units | Multifamily | $ | 29,000 | 100.0 | % | 96 | % | 92 | % | $ | 1,348.42 | $ | 1,300.62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 Exchange | Akron, Ohio | April 16, 2013 | 471 beds / 22,104 sq ft retail space | Student housing | 18,963 | 90.0 | % | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parkside Apartments (“Parkside”) | Sugar Land, Texas | August 8, 2013 | 240 units | Multifamily | 9,721 | 90.0 | % | 93 | % | 96 | % | 1,116.33 | 1,142.08 | Sugar Land, Texas | August 8, 2013 | 240 units | Multifamily | $ | 17,289 | 90.0 | % | 95 | % | 93 | % | $ | 1,169.59 | $ | 1,185.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flats at Fishers | Fishers, Indiana | November 30, 2017 | 306 Units | Multifamily | - | 100.0 | % | 73 | % | (5 | ) | 1,094.71 | (5 | ) | Fishers, Indiana | November 30, 2017 | 306 units | Multifamily | $ | 28,800 | 100.0 | % | 96 | % | 92 | % | $ | 1,182.01 | $ | 1,125.48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Axis at Westmont | Westmont, Illinois | November 27, 2018 | 400 units | Multifamily | $ | 37,600 | 100.0 | % | 93 | % | 94 | % | $ | 1,177.56 | $ | 1,171.72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Valley Ranch Apartments (3) | Ann Arbor, Michigan | February 14, 2019 | 384 units | Multifamily | $ | 43,414 | 100.0 | % | 94 | % | 93 | % | $ | 1,449.30 | $ | 1,415.84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autumn Breeze Apartments (4) | Noblesville, Indiana | March 17, 2020 | 280 units | Multifamily | $ | 29,920 | 100.0 | % | 95 | % | N/A | $ | 1,057.28 | N/A |
(1) | Effective monthly rent is calculated using leases in place as of December 31 of the indicated year and takes into account any rent concessions. |
(2) | River Club and the Townhomes at River Club consist of two student housing complexes with a total of 1,134 beds. |
(3) |
(4) |
The following information generally applies to our consolidated investments in our real estate properties:
● | we believe our real estate property is adequately covered by insurance and suitable for its intended purpose;
As of the date hereof, we are not a party
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure.
None
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
There currently is no established public trading market for our shares of common stock. Therefore, there is a risk that a stockholder may not be able to sell
Estimated Net Asset Value (“NAV”) and NAV per Share of Common Stock (“NAV per Share”)
On
The estimated NAV of our shares was calculated as of a particular point in time. The estimated NAV of our shares will fluctuate over time in response to developments related to individual assets in the portfolio and the management of those assets and in response to the real estate and finance markets. There is no assurance of the extent to which the current estimated valuation should be relied upon for any purpose after its effective date Process and Methodology
Our business is managed by
Our estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share as of September 30,
In arriving at an estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share, our board of directors reviewed and considered the valuation analyses prepared by The engagement of Capright with respect to our estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share as of September 30,
Capright’s opinion was subject to various limitations. In forming its opinion, Capright relied on certain information provided by our Advisor and third parties without independent verification. Our Advisor provided Capright with certain information regarding lease terms and the physical condition and capital expenditure requirements of each property. Capright did not perform engineering or structural studies or environmental studies of any of the properties, nor did they perform an independent appraisal of the other assets and liabilities included in our estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share.
In forming their conclusion as to the “as-is” value of the real estate investments held by
In addition to their appraisals of seven of our eight consolidated properties, Capright also evaluated the following information to arrive at their
Capright has acted as a valuation advisor to
The following is a summary of the valuation methodologies used for each type of asset: Investments in
In forming its opinion, Capright prepared appraisals on
While we and our Advisor believe that the approaches used by appraisers in valuing our real estate assets, including an income approach using discounted cash flow analysis and sales comparable analysis, is standard in the real estate industry, the estimated values for our investments in real estate may or may not represent current market values or fair values determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). Real estate is currently carried at its amortized cost basis in our financial statements, subject to any adjustments applicable under GAAP.
Cash and cash equivalents.The estimated value of our cash and cash equivalents approximate their carrying value due to their short term maturities. Marketable securities, available for sale. The estimated values of our marketable securities are based on Level 2 inputs. Level 2 inputs are inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. All of our marketable securities measured using Level 2 inputs were valued based on a market approach using readily available quoted market prices for similar assets. Restricted cash.The estimated value of our restricted cash approximate their carrying value due to their short term maturities. Note receivable, net. The estimated value of our note receivable, net approximates its carrying value as of September 30, 2020 based on current market rates for similar instruments.
Notes payable.
8 Other assets and liabilities, net.Our other assets and liabilities, net consist of
Noncontrolling
Common
Our estimated NAV per Share was calculated by aggregating the value of our assets, subtracting the value of both our liabilities and noncontrolling interests, and dividing the net amount by the fully-diluted shares of common stock outstanding, all as of September 30,
Allocation of Estimated NAV per Share
The table below sets forth the calculation of
Notes:
The following are ranges of the key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow models to estimate the value of
The estimated values of
While we believe that our assumptions utilized are reasonable, a change in these assumptions would affect the calculation of the value of our real estate assets. The table below presents the estimated increase or decrease to our estimated NAV per Share resulting from a 25 basis point increase and decrease in the discount rates and capitalization
Historical Estimated NAV per Share
The historical reported estimated NAV per Share of our common stock as approved by
Limitations and Risks
As with any valuation methodology, the methodology used to determine our estimated NAV and resulting NAV per Share is based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may prove later not to be accurate or complete. Further, different participants with different property-specific and general real estate and capital market assumptions, estimates, judgments and standards could derive a different estimated NAV per Share, which could be significantly different from the estimated NAV per Share approved by our board of directors. The estimated NAV per Share approved by our board of directors does not represents the fair value of our assets and liabilities in accordance with GAAP, and such estimated NAV per Share is not a representation, warranty or guarantee that:
The Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Labor do not provide any guidance on the methodology an issuer must use to determine its estimated NAV per share. FINRA guidance provides that NAV valuations be derived from a methodology that conforms to standard industry practice.
As with any valuation methodology, our methodology is based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. Different parties with different assumptions and estimates could derive different estimated NAVs and resulting NAVs per share, and these differences could be significant. The estimated NAV per Share is not audited and does not represent the fair value of our assets less our liabilities in accordance GAAP, nor do they represent an actual liquidation value of our assets and liabilities or the amount shares of our common stock would trade at on a national securities exchange. Our estimated NAV per Share is based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities and other non-controlling interests divided by the number of our diluted shares of common stock outstanding, all as of the date indicated. Our estimated NAV per Share does not reflect a discount for the fact we are externally managed, nor does it reflect a real estate portfolio premium/discount versus the sum of the individual property values. Our estimated NAV per Share does not take into account estimated disposition costs or fees or penalties, if any, that may apply upon the prepayment of certain of our debt obligations or the impact of restrictions on the assumption of certain debt. Our estimated NAV per Share will fluctuate over time as a result of, among other things, future acquisitions or dispositions of assets, developments related to individual assets and the management of those assets and changes in the real estate and capital markets. Different parties using different assumptions and estimates could derive different NAVs and resulting estimated NAVs per share, and these differences could be significant. Markets for real estate and real estate-related investments can fluctuate and values are expected to change in the future. Our Estimated Valuation Policy requires us to update our estimated NAV per Share value on
The following factors may cause a stockholder not to ultimately realize distributions per share of common stock equal to the estimated NAV per Share upon liquidation:
Holders
As of March
Distributions
We made an election to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2008. U.S. federal tax law requires a REIT distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP) determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. In order to continue to qualify for REIT status, we may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available. Distributions are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors based on their analysis of our performance over the previous periods and expectations of performance for future periods. Such analyses may include actual and anticipated operating cash flow, capital expenditure needs, general financial and market conditions, proceeds from asset sales and other factors that our board of directors
During 2014 and 2015,
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
Tender Offers 2020 Tender Offer We commenced a tender offer on June 16, 2020, pursuant to which we The 2020 Tender Offer terminated on July 24, 2020, and a total of 26,637 shares were validly tendered and not withdrawn pursuant to the 2020 Tender Offer as of such date. In accordance with the terms of the 2020 Tender Offer, we subsequently repurchased all of the tendered shares for approximately $0.1 million in August 2020.
2019 Tender Offer
We commenced a tender offer on December 17, 2019, pursuant to which we offered to acquire up to 2.0 million shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $7.75 per share, or $15.5 million in the aggregate (the “2019 Tender Offer”). The 2019 Tender Offer terminated on February 28, 2020, and a total of 2,183,888 shares were validly tendered and not withdrawn pursuant to the 2019 Tender Offer as of such date, an amount that exceeded the maximum number of shares we offered to purchase pursuant to the 2019 Tender Offer. In accordance with the terms of the 2019 Tender Offer, we subsequently repurchased a total of approximately 2.0 million shares for approximately $15.6 million in April 2020. Because the amount of repurchase requests exceeded the maximum number of shares we had offered to repurchase, we repurchased shares on a pro-rata basis, subject to “odd lot” priority as described in the 2019 Tender Offer. Excluding the stockholders eligible for “odd lot” priority that were not be subject to proration, approximately 91.58% of the number of shares tendered by each remaining stockholder who participated in the 2019 Tender Offer were repurchased by us. Share Redemption Program and Redemption Price
Our board of directors has adopted a share redemption program (the “SRP”) that permits stockholders to sell their shares back to us, subject to the significant conditions and limitations of the
On August 9, 2017, our board of directors adopted a Fourth Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program (the “Fourth Amended SRP”) which became effective July 1, 2018. The
Pursuant to the
Any redemption requests are honored pro rata among all requests received based on funds available and are not honored on a first come, first served basis.
On In accordance with our Fifth Amended SRP, the per share redemption price On December 13, 2019, our board of directors approved the suspension of the Our board of directors will continue to consider the liquidity available to stockholders going forward, balanced with our other long-term interests and other long-term interests of the stockholders. It is possible that in the
On an annual basis, we will not redeem in excess of 0.5% of the number of
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.
Executive Overview
We were formed primarily to acquire and operate commercial real estate and real estate-related assets on an opportunistic and value-add basis. In particular, we have focused generally on acquiring commercial properties with significant possibilities for capital appreciation, such as those requiring development, redevelopment or repositioning, those located in markets and submarkets with high growth potential, and those available from sellers who were distressed or faced time-sensitive deadlines. In addition, our opportunistic and value-add investment strategy has included investments in real estate-related assets that present opportunities for higher current income. Since inception, we have acquired a wide variety of commercial properties, including office, industrial, retail, hospitality, and multifamily. We have purchased existing, income-producing properties and newly constructed properties. We have also invested in mortgage and mezzanine loans. We have made our investments in or in respect of real estate assets located in the United States and other countries based on our view of existing market conditions.
14 COVID-19 Pandemic On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic leading many countries, including the United States, particularly at the individual state level, to subsequently impose various degrees of restrictions and other measures, including, but not limited to, mandatory temporary closures, quarantine guidelines, limitations on travel, and “shelter in place” rules in an effort to reduce its duration and the severity of its spread. Although the COVID-19 pandemic has continued to evolve, most of these previously imposed restrictions and other measures have now been reduced and/or lifted. However, the COVID-19 pandemic remains highly unpredictable and dynamic and its duration and extent is likely dependent on numerous developments such as the regulatory approval, mass production, administration and ultimate effectiveness of vaccines, as well as the timeline to achieve a level of sufficient herd immunity amongst the general population. Accordingly, the COVID-19 pandemic may continue to have negative effects on the overall health of the U.S. economy Our consolidated portfolio of
While our business has not yet seen any material impact from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the extent to which we may be affected in future periods will largely depend on both current and future developments, all of If our
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We had cash and cash equivalents of
We have borrowed money to acquire properties and make other investments. Under our charter, the maximum amount of our indebtedness is limited to 300% of our “net assets” (as defined by our charter) as of the date of any borrowing; however, we may exceed that limit if approved by a majority of our independent directors. In addition to our charter limitation, our board of directors has adopted a policy to generally limit our aggregate borrowings to approximately 75% of the aggregate value of our assets unless substantial justification exists that borrowing a greater amount is in our best interests. Our policy limitation, however, does not apply to individual real estate assets.
Autumn Breeze Apartments On March 17, 2020, we acquired a 280-unit multifamily property located in Noblesville, Indiana (the “Autumn Breeze Apartments”) from an unrelated third party for a contractual purchase price of $43.0 million. In connection with the acquisition, we subsequently entered into a 10-year $29.9 million non-recourse mortgage loan (the “Autumn Breeze Apartments Loan”) scheduled to mature on April 1, 2030. The Autumn Breeze Apartments Loan bears interest at 3.39% and requires monthly interest-only payments through June 30, 2023 and monthly principal and interest payments of approximately $0.1 million thereafter, through its stated maturity. The Autumn Breeze Apartments Loan is collateralized by the Autumn Breeze Apartments. Valley Ranch Apartments On February 14, 2019, we completed the acquisition of a 384-unit multifamily property located in Ann Arbor, Michigan (the “Valley Ranch Apartments”) from an unrelated third party, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $70.3 million, excluding closing and other related transaction costs. In connection with the acquisition of the Valley Ranch Apartments, we simultaneously entered into a seven-year $43.4 million non-recourse mortgage loan (the “Valley Ranch Mortgage”) scheduled to mature on March 1, 2026. The Valley Ranch Mortgage bears interest at 4.16% and requires monthly interest-only payments through its stated maturity. The Valley Ranch Mortgage is collateralized by the Valley Ranch Apartments. 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan On February 28, 2019, we, as the lender, and an unrelated third party (the “500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan Borrower), as the borrower, entered into a promissory note (the “500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan”) pursuant to which we would fund up to $12.0 million of mezzanine financing. The 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan is classified in Note Receivable on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. See Note 7 – “Note Receivable” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Disposition Activity and Properties Held for Sale Gardens Medical Pavilion On January 15, 2020, we and the noncontrolling member completed the disposition of the Gardens Medical Pavilion for an aggregate contractual sales price of $24.3 million. In connection with the disposition of the Gardens Medical Pavilion, we recognized a gain on the sale of investment property of approximately $5.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2020. Approximately $12.6 million of the proceeds were used towards the repayment in full of a mortgage loan (the “Gardens Medical Mortgage”) secured by the Gardens Medical Pavilion . Additionally, approximately $1.8 million of the remaining proceeds were distributed to the noncontrolling member. As of December 31, 2019, the Gardens Medical Pavilion met the criteria to be classified as held for sale and therefore, its associated assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019. Lakes of Margate Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2019, Lakes of Margate met the criteria to be classified as held for sale and therefore, its associated assets and liabilities, which were expected to be sold within 12 months, were previously classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets as of both March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. However, because of the COVID-19 pandemic we subsequently decided during the second quarter of 2020 to discontinue our marketing efforts and to retain the property for the foreseeable future. Additionally, on June 26, 2020 we obtained a new 10-year mortgage financing (the “Lakes of Margate Loan”) on the property, which previously was unencumbered. As a result, we determined the property should no longer be classified as held for sale effective as of June 30, 2020 because a sale was no longer considered probable within the next 12 months. Since the fair value of the property was in excess of our carrying value, we recorded catch-up depreciation for the period the property was previously classified as held for sale. In addition, we no longer have classified the long-lived asset as held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019. Despite us discontinuing marketing efforts and deciding to retain the property for the foreseeable future, we were approached by an unrelated third-party during the third quarter of 2020 and ultimately entered into a purchase and sale agreement (the “Lakes of Margate Agreement”) with Lakes at Margate Apartments FL LLC (the “Lakes of Margate Buyer”). Pursuant to the terms of the Lakes of Margate Agreement, the Lakes at Margate would be sold to the Lakes of Margate Buyer for aggregate consideration of $51.0 million, including the assumption of the existing Lakes of Margate Loan, which was subject to the Lakes of Margate Buyer obtaining the lender’s consent. Because the proposed transaction was contingent on the Lakes of Margate Buyer obtaining lender approval for the assumption of the existing Lakes of Margate Loan, which was outside of our control, a sale of the property within the next 12 months was not deemed probable as of September 30, 2020 and we continued to classify Lakes of Margate as held for use on our consolidated balance sheet as of that date. During the fourth quarter of 2020, the Lakes of Margate Buyer successfully obtained the lender’s approval to assume the existing Lakes of Margate Loan in connection with the proposed transaction and, as a result, the Lakes of On March 17, 2021, the disposition of the Lakes of Margate was completed pursuant to the terms of the Lakes of Margate Agreement. At closing, the Buyer paid $15.3 million and Additionally, see Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information related to
Debt Financings
From time to time, we have obtained mortgage, bridge, or mezzanine loans for acquisitions and investments, as well as property development. In the future, we may obtain financing for property development or to refinance our existing real estate assets, depending on multiple factors.
Debt Transactions On February 14, 2019, we entered into the Valley Ranch Mortgage scheduled to mature on On
On On March 17, 2020, we entered into the Autumn Breeze Apartments Loan scheduled to mature on April 1, 2030. The Autumn Breeze Apartments Loan bears interest at 3.39% and requires monthly interest-only payments through June 30, 2023 and monthly principal and interest payments of approximately $0.1 million thereafter, through its stated maturity. The Autumn Breeze Apartments Loan is collateralized by the Autumn Breeze Apartments. On June 26, 2020, we and the noncontrolling member entered into a 10-year, $35.7 million non-recourse mortgage loan (the "Lakes of Margate Loan") scheduled to mature on July 1, 2030. The Lakes of Margate Loan bears interest at LIBOR + 2.98% and requires monthly interest-only payments through the first four years of the term and thereafter, monthly payments of principal and interest based upon a 30-year amortization. The Lakes of Margate Loan is collateralized by the Lakes of Margate. In connection with the Lakes of Margate Loan, we paid the Advisor an aggregate of approximately $0.4 million in financing fees. Additionally, approximately $1.4 million of the financing proceeds were distributed to the noncontrolling member. On March 15,
Contractual Obligations
One of our principal short-term and long-term liquidity requirements includes the repayment of maturing debt. The following table provides information with respect to the contractual maturities and scheduled principal repayments of our indebtedness as of December 31,
Results of Operations
As of December 31, On March 17, 2020, we On February 28, 2019, we entered into a mezzanine loan (500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan) and in January 2019, we received proceeds of approximately $10.9 million related to our equity method investment in Prospect Park representing the minimum amount payable for On January 15,
Year ended December 31,
Our results of operations for the year ended December 31,
The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the years ended December 31,
The following table reflects total rental
The tables below reflect occupancy and effective monthly rental rates for our Same Store properties:
Revenues. Rental revenues for the year ended December 31,
Property Operating Expenses. Property operating expenses for the year ended December 31,
Real Estate Taxes. Real estate taxes for the year ended December 31,
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31,
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $9.6 million, an increase of $0.4 million, compared to $9.2 million for the same period in 2019. Excluding the effect of our acquisition and disposition activities, interest expense increased slightly by $0.1 million for our Same Store
Gain on Sale of
Summary of Cash Flows Operating activities
Investing activities
The net cash
Financing activities
The net cash
Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings, improvements, and straight-line amortization of intangibles, which implies that the value of a real estate asset diminishes predictably over time. We believe that, because real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including, but not limited to, inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using the historical accounting convention for depreciation and certain other items may be less informative.
Because of these factors, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"), an industry trade group, has published a standardized measure of performance known as funds from operations ("FFO"), which is used in the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. We believe FFO, which excludes certain items such as real estate-related depreciation and amortization, is an appropriate supplemental measure of a REIT's operating performance. FFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under GAAP.
We
We believe that the use of FFO provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to management, and reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income.
Changes in the accounting and reporting promulgations under GAAP that were put into effect in 2009 subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT's definition of FFO, such as the change to expense as incurred rather than capitalize and depreciate acquisition fees and expenses incurred for business combinations, have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, specifically acquisition fees and expenses, as items that are expensed under GAAP across all industries. These changes had a particularly significant impact on publicly registered, non-listed REITs, which typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity in the early part of their existence, particularly during the period when they are raising capital through ongoing initial public offerings.
Because of these factors, the Investment Program Association (the "IPA"), an industry trade group, published a standardized measure of performance known as modified funds from operations ("MFFO"), which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered, non-listed REITs. MFFO is designed to be reflective of the ongoing operating performance of publicly registered, non-listed REITs by adjusting for those costs that are more reflective of acquisitions and investment activity, along with other items the IPA believes are not indicative of the ongoing operating performance of a publicly registered, non-listed REIT, such as straight-lining of rents as required by GAAP. We believe it is appropriate to use MFFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance because we believe that both before and after we have deployed all of our offering proceeds and are no longer incurring a significant amount of acquisition fees or other related costs, it reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under GAAP.
We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA's Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations (the "Practice Guideline") issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for acquisition and transaction-related fees and expenses and other items. In calculating MFFO, we follow the Practice Guideline and exclude acquisition and transaction-related fees and expenses (which includes costs incurred in connection with strategic alternatives), amounts relating to deferred rent receivables and amortization of market lease and other intangibles, net (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments), accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments and borrowings, mark-to-market adjustments included in net income (including gains or losses incurred on assets held for sale), gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. Certain of the above adjustments are also made to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, such as for the amortization of a premium and accretion of a discount on debt and securities investments, amortization of fees, any unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives, securities or other investments, as well as other adjustments. MFFO excludes non-recurring impairment of real estate-related investments. We assess the credit quality of our investments and adequacy of reserves on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as necessary. Significant judgment is required in this analysis. We consider the estimated net recoverable value of a loan as well as other factors, including but not limited to the fair value of any collateral, the amount and the status of any senior debt, the prospects for the borrower and the competitive situation of the region where the borrower does business.
We believe that, because MFFO excludes costs that we consider more reflective of acquisition activities and other non-operating items, MFFO can provide, on a going-forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we are acquiring properties and once our portfolio is stabilized. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the non-listed REIT industry and allows for an evaluation of our performance against other publicly registered, non-listed REITs.
Not all REITs, including publicly registered, non-listed REITs, calculate FFO and MFFO the same way. Accordingly, comparisons with other REITs, including publicly registered, non-listed REITs, may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations as determined under GAAP as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with other GAAP measurements as an indication of our performance. FFO and MFFO should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating our operating performance. The methods utilized to evaluate the performance of a publicly registered, non-listed REIT under GAAP should be construed as more relevant measures of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP measures, FFO and MFFO, and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.
Neither the SEC, NAREIT, the IPA nor any other regulatory body or industry trade group has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, NAREIT, the IPA or another industry trade group may publish updates to the White Paper or the Practice Guidelines or the SEC or another regulatory body could standardize the allowable adjustments across the publicly registered, non-listed REIT industry, and we would have to adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO accordingly.
Our calculations of FFO and MFFO
Distributions
We made an election to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2008. U.S. federal tax law requires a REIT to distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP) determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. In order to continue to qualify for REIT status, we may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available. Distributions, if any, are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors based on their analysis of our performance over the previous periods and expectations of performance for future periods. Such analyses may include actual and anticipated operating cash flow, capital expenditure needs, general financial and market conditions, proceeds from asset sales and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant.
During 2014 and 2015, our board of directors
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include such items as purchase price allocation for real estate acquisitions, impairment of long-lived assets, depreciation and amortization, and allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Below is a discussion of the accounting policies that we consider to be critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of other subsidiaries over which we have control. All inter-company transactions, balances, and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. In addition, interests in entities acquired are evaluated based on applicable GAAP, and deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIE”) in which we are the primary beneficiary are also consolidated. If the interest in the entity is determined not to be a VIE, then the entity is evaluated for consolidation based on legal form, economic substance, and the extent to which we have control, substantive participating rights or both under the respective ownership agreement. For entities in which we have less than a controlling interest
There are judgments and estimates involved in determining if an entity in which we have made an investment is a VIE and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary. The entity is evaluated to determine if it is a VIE by, among other things, calculating the percentage of equity being risked compared to the total equity of the entity. Determining expected future losses involves assumptions of various possibilities of the results of future operations of the entity, assigning a probability to each possibility and using a discount rate to determine the net present value of those future losses. A change in the judgments, assumptions, and estimates outlined above could result in consolidating an entity that should not be consolidated or accounting for an investment using the equity method that should in fact be consolidated, the effects of which could be material to our financial statements.
The cost of the real estate assets acquired in an asset acquisition is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases for acquired in-place leases and the value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values. Fees incurred related to asset acquisitions are capitalized as part of the cost of the investment. Upon the acquisition of real estate properties that qualify as a business, we recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest as of the acquisition date, measured at their fair values. The acquisition date is the date on which we obtain control of the real estate property. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed may consist of land, inclusive of associated rights, buildings, assumed debt, identified intangible assets and liabilities, and asset retirement obligations. Identified intangible assets generally consist of above-market leases, in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, in-place leasing commissions, and tenant relationships. Identified intangible liabilities generally consist of below-market leases. Goodwill is recognized as of the acquisition date and measured as the aggregate fair value of consideration transferred and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. Likewise, a bargain purchase gain is recognized in current earnings when the aggregate fair value of consideration transferred and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree is less than the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. Acquisition-related costs are expensed in the period incurred. Initial valuations are subject to change until our information is finalized, which is no later than twelve months from the acquisition date.
The fair value of the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land and buildings, is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and buildings. Land values are derived from appraisals, and building values are calculated as replacement cost less depreciation or management’s estimates of the fair value of these assets using discounted cash flow analyses or similar methods believed to be used by market participants. The value of hotels and all other buildings is depreciated over the estimated useful lives of 39 years and 25 years, respectively, using the straight-line method.
We determine the fair value of assumed debt by calculating the net present value of the scheduled mortgage payments using interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities that management believes we could obtain at the date of the debt assumption. Any difference between the fair value and stated value of the assumed debt is recorded as a discount or premium and amortized over the remaining life of the loan using the effective interest method.
We
disposal costs. For sales of real estate or assets classified as held for sale, we evaluate whether a disposal transaction meets the criteria of a strategic shift
Investment Impairment
For all of our real estate and real estate-related investments, we monitor events and changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable. Examples of the types of events and circumstances that would cause management to assess our assets for potential impairment include, but are not limited to: a significant decrease in the market price of an asset; a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used; an accumulation of costs in excess of the acquisition basis plus construction of the property; major vacancies and the resulting loss of revenues; natural disasters; a change in the projected holding period; legitimate purchase offers; and changes in the global and local markets or economic conditions. To the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in limited geographic locations, downturns specifically related to such regions may result in tenants defaulting on their lease obligations at those properties within a short time period, which may result in asset impairments. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, we assess potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset and from its eventual disposition to the carrying amount of the asset. These projected cash flows are prepared internally by the Advisor and reflect in-place and projected leasing activity, market revenue and expense growth rates, market capitalization rates, discount rates, and changes in economic and other relevant conditions. Our management reviews these projected cash flows to assure that the valuation is prepared using reasonable inputs and assumptions that are consistent with market data or with assumptions that would be used by a third-party market participant and assume the highest and best use of the investment. We consider trends, strategic decisions regarding future development plans, and other factors in our assessment of whether impairment conditions exist. In the event that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the asset to estimated fair value. While we believe our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding factors such as market rents, economic conditions, and occupancy rates could significantly affect these estimates.
In evaluating our investments for impairment, management may use appraisals and make estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, the projected date of disposition of the properties, the estimated future cash flows of the properties during our ownership, and the projected sales price of each of the properties. A future change in these estimates and assumptions could result in understating or overstating the carrying value of our investments, which could be material to our financial statements. In addition, we may incur impairment charges on assets classified as held for sale in the future if the carrying amount of the asset upon classification as held for sale exceeds the estimated fair value, less costs to sell.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The information required by this Item 8 is included in our Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) and Rule 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated,
We believe, however, that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud or error, if any, within a
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated,
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31,
None.
27
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Directors
Because our directors take a critical role in guiding our strategic direction and overseeing our management, they must demonstrate broad-based business and professional skills and experiences, concern for the long-term interests of our stockholders, and personal integrity and judgment. In addition, our directors must have time available to devote to board activities and to enhance their knowledge of our industry. As described further below, we believe our directors have the appropriate mix of experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills required of our board members in the context of the current needs of our company.
Andreas K. Bremer,
Our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Bremer is qualified to serve as one of our directors for reasons including his more than 25 years of financial and general management experience, including international corporate finance and commercial lending. Mr. Bremer has served in various financial management positions and has significant experience in acquisition, disposition, management, and administration of commercial real estate investments. In addition, Mr. Bremer’s international background brings a unique perspective to our board.
Diane S. Detering-Paddison,
Our board of directors has concluded that Ms. Detering-Paddison is qualified to serve as one of our directors for reasons including her more than Jeffrey F. Joseph,
Our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Joseph is qualified to serve as one of our directors for reasons including his more than 40 years of real estate industry experience.
David Lichtenstein,
Our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Lichtenstein is qualified to serve as one of our directors for reasons including his more than 25 years of financial and general management experience, including significant experience in acquisition, disposition, management, and administration of commercial real estate investments.
Jeffrey P. Mayer,
Our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Mayer is qualified to serve as one of our directors and as Chairman of our Audit Committee for reasons including his more than 30 years of accounting and finance experience in the commercial real estate industry. In particular, Mr. Mayer has served as Chief Financial Officer for two commercial real estate companies and has significant management experience relating to preparing and reviewing financial statements and coordinating with external auditors. Mr. Mayer continues to provide consulting services to the commercial real estate industry and is in tune with current industry trends and issues.
Cynthia Pharr Lee,
Our board of directors has concluded that Ms. Lee is qualified to serve as one of our directors for reasons including her more than
Steven Spinola,
Our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Spinola is qualified to serve as one of our directors for reasons including his extensive experience in the real estate industry.
Executive Officers
In addition, the following individuals serve as our executive officers:
Mitchell Hochberg,
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires each director, officer, and individual beneficially owning more than 10% of a registered security of the Company to file with the SEC, within specified time frames, initial statements of beneficial ownership (Form 3) and statements of changes in beneficial ownership (Forms 4 and 5) of common stock of the Company. These specified time frames require the reporting of changes in ownership within two business days of the transaction giving rise to the reporting obligation. Reporting persons are required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms filed with the SEC. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company during and with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31,
Code of Ethics
Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct Policy that is applicable to all members of our board of directors, our executive officers and employees of our Advisor and its affiliates. We have posted the policy on the website maintained for us atwww.lightstonecapitalmarkets.com. If, in the future, we amend, modify or waive a provision in the Code of Business Conduct Policy, we may, rather than filing a Current Report on Form 8-K, satisfy the disclosure requirement by promptly posting such information on the website maintained for us as necessary.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Audit Committee consists of independent directors Jeffrey P. Mayer, the chairman, Andreas K. Bremer, Diane S. Detering-Paddison, Jeffrey F. Joseph, Steven Spinola and Cynthia Pharr Lee. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Mayer is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the rules of the SEC. The biography of Mr. Mayer, including his relevant qualifications, is previously described in this Item 10. 31
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Executive Compensation
We do not directly compensate our named executive officers, nor do we reimburse
Reimbursement for the costs of salaries and benefits of
Directors’ Compensation
All directors receive reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of our board of directors. If a director is also an affiliate director, we do not pay compensation for services rendered as a director.
Director Compensation Table
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our director compensation during the fiscal year ended December 31,
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of our compensation committee served as an officer or employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries during the fiscal year ended December 31,
32
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table sets forth information as of March
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.
Policies and Procedures for Transactions with Related Persons
We do not currently have written formal policies and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of transactions with related persons, as defined by Item 404 of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act. Under that definition, transactions with related persons are transactions in which we were or are a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Related parties include any executive officers, directors, director nominees, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our voting securities, immediate family members of any of the foregoing persons, and any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed and in which such person has 10% or greater beneficial ownership interest.
However, in order to reduce or eliminate certain potential conflicts of interest, our charter contains a number of restrictions relating to (1) transactions we enter into with our Advisor and its affiliates, (2) certain future offerings, and (3) allocation of investment opportunities among affiliated entities. As a general rule, any related party transactions must be approved by a majority of the directors (including a majority of independent directors) not otherwise interested in the transaction. In determining whether to approve or authorize a particular related party transaction, these persons will consider whether the transaction between us and the related party is fair and reasonable to us.
Related Party Transactions
Advisor and Property Manager
leasing agreement. The following discussion describes the fees and expenses payable to
The following table represents the fees incurred associated with the payments to our Advisor for the periods indicated (amounts in thousands):
As of December 31, 2020, we had no amounts payable to the
$6,000.
We are dependent on Advance from Advisor On March 16, 2020, the Advisor provided an advance of $25.0 million to us that bore interest at a fixed-rate of 5.00%. On March 31, 2020, we repaid $15.0 million of the advance and on June 29, 2020, we repaid the remaining $10.0 million of the advance and aggregate accrued interest of $0.2 million. Approximately $0.2 million of interest expense was incurred on the advance during the year ended December 31. 2020. Independence
Although our shares are not listed for trading on any national securities exchange and therefore our board of directors is not subject to the independence requirements of the NYSE or any other national securities exchange, our board has evaluated whether our directors are “independent” as defined by the NYSE. The NYSE standards provide that to qualify as an independent director, in addition to satisfying certain bright-line criteria, the board of directors must affirmatively determine that a director has no material relationship with us (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us).
Consistent with these considerations, after review of all relevant transactions or relationships between each director, or any of his or her family members, and the Company, our senior management and our independent registered public accounting firm, the board has determined that the majority of the members of our board, and each member of our audit committee, compensation committee and nominating committee, is “independent” as defined by the NYSE.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
EisnerAmper LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since April 2017. Our management believes that they are knowledgeable about our operations and accounting practices and well qualified to act as our independent registered public accounting firm.
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
The following table presents the aggregate fees
Our audit committee considers the provision of these services to be compatible with maintaining the independence of our independent registered accounting firms.
Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Our audit committee must approve any fee for services to be performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm in advance of the service being performed. For proposed projects using the services of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that are expected to cost under $100,000, our audit committee will be provided information to review and must approve each project prior to commencement of any work. For proposed projects using the services of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that are expected to cost $100,000 and over, our audit committee will be provided with a detailed explanation of what is being included, and asked to approve a maximum amount for specifically identified services in each of the following categories: (1) audit fees; (2) audit-related fees; (3) tax fees; and (4) all other fees for any services allowed to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. If additional amounts are needed, our audit committee must approve the increased amounts prior to the previously approved maximum being reached and before the work may continue. Approval by our audit committee may be made at its regularly scheduled meetings or otherwise, including by telephonic or other electronic communications. The Company will report the status of the various types of approved services and fees, and cumulative amounts paid and owed, to our audit committee on a regular basis. Our audit committee has considered the independent registered public accounting firm’s non-audit services provided to the Company and has determined that such services are compatible with maintaining its independence.
Our audit committee approved all of the services provided by, and fees paid to, EisnerAmper LLP
37
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
The list of the financial statements filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is set forth on page F-1 herein.
The list of exhibits filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is submitted in the Exhibit Index following the financial statements in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
The exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
All financial statement schedules
None.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our
We conducted our
Our
Critical Audit Matter The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates. Investment Property – Indicators of Impairment As of December 31, 2020, the Company had investment property, net of accumulated depreciation, of approximately $267.7 million. As more fully described in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company monitors events and changes in circumstances representing triggering events that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the investment property may not be recoverable. Examples of the types of events and circumstances that would cause management to assess the Company’s investment property for potential impairment include, but are not limited to: a significant decrease in the market price of an asset; a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used; an accumulation of costs in excess of the acquisition basis plus construction of the property; major vacancies and the resulting loss of revenues; natural disasters; a change in the projected holding period; legitimate purchase offers; and changes in the global and local markets or economic conditions. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, the Company assesses potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset and from its eventual disposition to the carrying amount of the asset. These projected cash flows reflect in-place and projected leasing activity, market revenue and expense growth rates, market capitalization rates, discount rates, and changes in economic and other relevant conditions. In evaluating the Company’s investment property for impairment, management may use appraisals and make estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to: the projected date of disposition of the properties, the estimated future cash flows of the properties during the Company’s ownership, and the projected sales price of each of the properties. We identified the evaluation of indicators of impairment as a critical audit matter due to significant judgment by management in identifying indicators of impairment. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and audit effort in performing procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management's significant estimates and assumptions related to impairment evaluation including identifying events and circumstances that exist that would indicate the carrying amount of investment property may not be recoverable. Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence, in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements. We obtained an understanding and evaluated the design of controls over the Company’s impairment evaluation. Our procedures included, among others, assessing the methodologies applied and identifying the existence of any triggering events, including comparing budget to actual operating income, comparing actual operating income to projected future operating income, and comparing actual, budgeted and projected occupancy percentages, and considering if the determination was reasonable considering the past and current performance of the property and if consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. We tested the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by management in its evaluation. We held discussions with management about the current status of certain properties to understand how management’s significant estimates and assumptions are developed considering potential future market conditions. /s/ EisnerAmper LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.
EISNERAMPER LLP Iselin, New Jersey March
F-3
Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4 Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity For the (dollars and shares in thousands)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended December 31,
(dollars in
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar
1. Business and Organization Business
Substantially all of
Organization
In connection with
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions) 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant assumptions and estimates relate to the valuation of real estate including impairment and depreciable lives. Application of these assumptions requires the exercise of judgment as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
There are judgments and estimates involved in determining if an entity in which
The cost of the real estate assets acquired in an asset acquisition is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases for acquired in-place leases and the value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values. Fees incurred related to asset acquisitions are capitalized as part of the cost of the investment. Upon the acquisition of real estate
The fair value of the tangible assets acquired, consisting of land and buildings, is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and buildings. Land values are derived from appraisals, and building values are calculated as replacement cost less depreciation or management’s estimates of the fair value of these assets using discounted cash flow analyses or similar methods believed to be used by market participants. The value of hotels and all other buildings is depreciated over the estimated useful lives of 39 years and 25 years, respectively, using the straight-line method.
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions) The Company determines the fair value of assumed debt by calculating the net present value of the scheduled mortgage payments using interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities that management believes
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Restricted Cash
As required by
Marketable Securities
Marketable securities currently consist of debt securities that are designated as available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value. Unrealized holding gains or losses for debt securities are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss). Realized gains or losses resulting from the sale of these securities are determined based on the specific identification of the securities sold. An impairment charge is recognized when the decline in the fair value of a security below the amortized cost basis is determined to be other-than-temporary. The Company considers various factors in determining whether to recognize an impairment charge, including the duration and severity of any decline in fair value below the Company’s amortized cost basis, any adverse changes in the financial condition of the issuers’ and its intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company did not recognize any impairment charges. F-10 Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions) Investment Impairment For all of
In evaluating
During the
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture
Revenue Recognition
Other Assets Other assets primarily consist of
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar
Income Taxes
To maintain its qualification as a REIT, the Company engages in certain activities As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had no material uncertain income tax positions. Additionally, even if the Company continues to qualify as a REIT, it may still be subject to some U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income and
Concentration of Credit Risk At December 31,
Noncontrolling Interest Noncontrolling interest represents the noncontrolling Earnings per Share
COVID-19 Pandemic On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic leading many countries, including the United States, particularly at the individual state level, to subsequently impose various degrees of restrictions and other measures, including, but not limited to, mandatory temporary closures, quarantine guidelines, limitations on travel, and “shelter in place” rules in an effort to reduce its duration and the severity of its spread. Although the COVID-19 pandemic has continued to evolve, most of these previously imposed restrictions and other measures have now been reduced and/or lifted. However, the COVID-19 pandemic remains highly unpredictable and dynamic and its duration and extent is likely dependent on numerous developments such as the regulatory approval, mass production, administration and ultimate effectiveness of vaccines, as well as the timeline to achieve a level of sufficient herd immunity amongst the general population. Accordingly, the COVID-19 pandemic may continue to have negative effects on the
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar
The Company’s consolidated portfolio of properties currently consists of seven multi-family apartment complexes and one student housing complex. Despite past and current restrictions and mitigation strategies, the Company’s multi-family properties still have not yet seen any significant impact from the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company’s student housing complex, which consists of the River Club Apartments and the Townhomes at River Club, are located in Athens, Georgia and principally serve as “off-campus” lodging for students attending the University of Georgia (“UGA”). Leases for the River Club Apartments and Townhomes at River Club generally have a term of one year running from August through July. UGA previously transitioned to online instruction during its Spring 2020 semester and for its other course offerings throughout the summer. However, UGA returned to “on-campus” classes beginning with its Fall 2020 semester and has continued “on-campus” classes into the current Spring 2021 semester. The Company’s student housing complex is located “off-campus” and therefore, its tenants are not required to vacate even if UGA does not conduct “on-campus” classes. However, if UGA decides to return to online instruction for its students in lieu of “on-campus” classes in future semesters, it could adversely impact leasing demand, occupancy levels and the operating results of the Company’s student housing complex in future periods. Additionally, the Company’s note receivable relates to a condominium development project located in New Yok City (the “Condominium Project”), which is subject to similar restrictions and risks. To date, the Company’s note receivable has not been significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. While the Company’s business has not yet seen any material impact from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the extent to which it may be affected in future periods will largely depend on current and future developments, all of which are highly uncertain and cannot be reasonably predicted. If the Company’s properties and real estate-related investments are negatively impacted in future periods for an extended period because (i) tenants are unable to pay their rent, (ii) demand for its student housing complex declines, and (iii) its borrower is unable to pay scheduled debt service on the outstanding note receivable; the Company’s business and financial results could be materially and adversely impacted. Reclassifications Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year Presentation. 3. New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2016, the FASB issued
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar
Marketable Securities The following is a summary of the Company’s available for sale securities:
Fair Value Measurements Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may
The fair values of the Company’s investments in debt securities are measured using quoted prices for
not active. As of December 31,
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar
5. Financial Instruments not Reported at Fair Value
As of December 31, The fair value of the notes payable is categorized as a Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis valuation on the estimated borrowing rates currently available for loans with similar terms and maturities. The fair value of the notes payable was determined by discounting the future contractual interest and principal payments by a market rate. Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of December 31,
Carrying amounts of
6. Real Estate and Real Estate-Related Investments
Note:
Real Estate Asset Acquisitions
On
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar
The capitalization rate for the acquisition of the
Valley Ranch Apartments
On February 14, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of a 384-unit multifamily property located in Ann Arbor, Michigan (the “Valley Ranch Apartments”) from an unrelated third party, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $70.3 million, excluding closing and other related transaction costs. In connection with the acquisition, the Advisor received an aggregate of approximately $1.2 million in acquisition fees and acquisition expense reimbursements.
In connection with the acquisition of the Valley Ranch Apartments, the Company simultaneously entered into a seven-year $43.4 million non-recourse mortgage loan (the “Valley Ranch Mortgage”) scheduled to mature on March 1, 2026. The Valley Ranch Mortgage bears interest at 4.16% and requires monthly interest-only payments through its stated maturity. The Valley Ranch Mortgage is collateralized by the Valley Ranch Apartments. See Note 11 for additional information. The Company determined this acquisition was an asset acquisition and allocated the total purchase price, including acquisition fees and expenses of $1.2 million, to the assets acquired based on their relative fair value. Approximately $24.1 million was allocated to land and improvements, $46.3 million was allocated to building and improvements, and $1.1 million was allocated to in-place lease intangibles. Real Estate Asset Dispositions - Continuing Operations The following disposition did not represent a strategic shift that had a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results and therefore did not qualify to be reported as discontinued operations and its operating results are reflected in the Company’s results from continuing operations in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented through the date of disposition: Gardens Medical Pavilion On December 23, 2019, the Company and CPI/AHP Garden Medical Pavilion Mob Owner, L.L.C. (the “Gardens Medical Pavilion Buyer”), an unaffiliated third party, entered into a purchase and sale agreement (the “Gardens Medical Pavilion Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company would dispose of the Gardens Medical Pavilion to the Gardens Medical Pavilion Buyer for an aggregate contractual sales price of $24.3 million. As of December 31, 2019, the Gardens Medical Pavilion met the criteria to be classified as held for sale and therefore, its associated assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019. On January 15, 2020, the Company completed the disposition of the Gardens Medical Pavilion to the Gardens Medical Pavilion Buyer for an aggregate contractual sales price of $24.3 million. In connection with the disposition of the Gardens Medical Pavilion, the Company recognized a gain on the sale of investment property of approximately $5.5 million during the first quarter of 2020. Approximately $12.6 million of the proceeds were used towards the repayment the Gardens Medical Mortgage. Additionally, approximately $1.8 million of the remaining proceeds were distributed to the noncontrolling member. See Notes 9 and 10 for additional information. Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar
7. Note Receivable
On February 28, 2019, the Company, as the lender, and an unrelated third party (the “500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan Borrower”), as the borrower, entered into a loan promissory note (the “500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan”) pursuant to which the Company would fund up to $12.0 million of mezzanine financing. On the same date, the Company initially funded $8.0 million of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan. Subsequently, through the first quarter of 2020, the Company funded an additional $4.0 million and as a result, the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan has been fully funded. The The 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan is due August 31, 2021 and is collateralized by the ownership interests of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan Borrower. The 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan Borrower owns a parcel of land located at 500 West 22nd Street, New York, New York on which it is developing and constructing the Condominium Project. Although New York City previously restricted certain non-essential construction activities because of the COVD-19 pandemic, which led to a temporarily suspension of construction of the Condominium Project, construction activities for the Condominium Project resumed in early May 2020 and its anticipated construction timeline has not been significantly impacted to date. The 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR + 11.0% per annum with a floor of 13.493% (13.493% as of December 31, 2020). The Company received an origination fee of 1.0% of the loan balance, or approximately $0.1 million, which is presented in the consolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan and is being amortized to interest income, using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method, over the initial term of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan. The 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan may be extended two additional six-month periods by the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan Borrower provided certain conditions are met, including the establishment of an additional reserve for interest and the payment of an extension fee equal to 0.25% of the outstanding loan balance. In connection with the initial funding under the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan, the Company retained approximately $2.1 million of the proceeds to establish a reserve for interest and other items, which is presented in the consolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan and are being applied against the first 8.0% of monthly interest due during the initial term of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan. Through December 31, 2020, approximately $1.7 million of the reserve has been recognized as interest income and the remaining balance of the reserve was approximately $0.4 million as of December 31, 2020. The additional monthly interest due above the 8.0% threshold is added to the balance of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan and payable at maturity. As of December 31, 2020, approximately $1.2 million of additional interest due is included in the balance of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan. During the years ended December 31,
F-17
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions) 8. Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture
Pursuant to the terms of the mezzanine loan,
On December 15, 2017, the Borrower sold Prospect Park to an unrelated third-party for a contractual sales price of approximately $100.5 million. In connection with the sale, the Borrower repaid the Senior Construction Loan in full and
On January
However, because of the COVID-19 pandemic the Company Despite the Company discontinuing marketing efforts and deciding to retain the property for the foreseeable future, it was approached by an unrelated third-party during the third quarter of 2020 and ultimately entered into a purchase and sale agreement (the “Lakes of Margate Agreement”) with Lakes at Margate Apartments FL LLC (the “Lakes of Margate Buyer”). Pursuant to the
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar
On March 17, 2021, the
The following
Gardens Medical Pavilion On December 23, 2019, the Company and the Gardens Medical Pavilion Buyer entered into the Gardens Medical Pavilion Agreement pursuant to which the Company would dispose of the Gardens Medical Pavilion to the Gardens Medical Pavilion Buyer for an aggregate contractual sales price of $24.3 million.
As of December 31, The following summary presents the
On January 15, 2020, the Company completed the disposition of the Gardens Medical Pavilion to
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar
10. Notes Payable
The
On
On On June 13, 2019, the Company entered into a seven-year $28.8 million non-recourse mortgage loan (the “Flats at Fishers Mortgage”) scheduled to mature on July 1, 2026. The Flats at Fishers Mortgage bears interest at 3.78% and requires monthly interest-only payments through the first two years of the term and thereafter, monthly payments of principal and interest based upon a 30-year amortization. The Flats at Fishers Mortgage is collateralized by the Flats at Fishers. On December 31, 2019, the Company repaid in full its Lakes of Margate Mortgage collateralized by the Lakes of Margate. On May 1, 2018, the Company entered into a seven-year non-recourse mortgage loan (the “River Club Mortgage”) in the amount of $30.4 million. The River Club Mortgage bears interest at Libor plus 1.78% and requires monthly interest-only payments during the first five years and interest and principal payments pursuant to Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)
On December
The following table provides information with respect to the contractual maturities and scheduled principal repayments of
Note:
Notes Payable included in Liabilities Held for Sale Lakes of Margate Loan On June 26, 2020, the Company and its noncontrolling member entered into a 10-year, $35.7 million non-recourse mortgage loan (the “Lakes of Margate Loan”) scheduled to mature on July 1, 2030. The Lakes of Margate Loan bears interest at LIBOR + 2.98% and requires monthly interest-only payments through the first four years of the term and thereafter, monthly payments of principal and interest based upon a 30-year amortization schedule. The Lakes of Margate Loan is collateralized by the Lakes of Margate. In As of December 31, 2020, the Lakes of Margate met the criteria to be classified as held for sale and therefore, its associated assets and liabilities, which include the Lakes of Margate Loan, are classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, On March 17, 2021, the
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar
On June 28, 2018, the Company entered into a three-year non-recourse mortgage loan (the “Gardens Medical Mortgage”) in the amount of $13.0 million. The Gardens Medical Mortgage bore interest at Libor plus 1.90% and required monthly interest and principal payments through its stated maturity with the
upon maturity. The
As of December 31, On January 15, 2020, the
Capitalization
As of December 31,
As of December 31,
The shares of convertible stock will be converted into shares of common stock automatically if (1)
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions) The timing of the conversion of any or all of the convertible stock may be deferred by Tender Offers 2020 Tender Offer The Company commenced a tender offer on June 16, 2020, pursuant to which it offered to acquire up to 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $2.25 per share, or approximately $0.7 million in the aggregate (the “2020 Tender Offer”). The 2020 Tender Offer terminated on July 24, 2020, and a total of 26,637 shares were validly tendered and not withdrawn pursuant to the 2020 Tender Offer as of such date. In accordance with the terms of the 2020 Tender Offer, the Company subsequently repurchased all of the tendered shares for approximately $0.1 million in August 2020. 2019 Tender Offer The Company commenced a tender offer on December 17, 2019, pursuant to which it offered to acquire up to 2.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $7.75 per share, or $15.5 million in the aggregate (the “2019 Tender Offer”). The 2019 Tender Offer terminated on February 28, 2020, and a total of 2,183,888 shares were validly tendered and not withdrawn pursuant to the 2019 Tender Offer as of such date, an amount that exceeded the maximum number of shares the Company offered to purchase pursuant to the 2019 Tender Offer. In accordance with the terms of the 2019 Tender Offer, the Company subsequently repurchased a total of approximately 2.0 million shares for approximately $15.6 million in April 2020. Because the amount of repurchase requests exceeded the maximum number of shares the Company had offered to repurchase, the Company repurchased shares on a pro-rata basis, subject to “odd lot” priority as described in the 2019 Tender Offer. Excluding the stockholders eligible for “odd lot” priority that were not be subject to proration, approximately 91.58% of the number of shares tendered by each remaining stockholder who participated in the 2019 Tender Offer were repurchased by the Company.
Share Redemption Program and Redemption Price
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company redeemed 1.2 million shares of its common stock at average prices per share of $7.94. On August 9, 2017, the Company’s board of directors adopted a Fourth Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program (the “Fourth Amended SRP”) which became effective July 1, 2018. The
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)
On In accordance with the Fifth Amended SRP, the per share redemption price On December 13, 2019, the Company’s board of directors approved the suspension of the SRP. Pursuant to the terms of the SRP, while the SRP is suspended, the Company will not accept any requests for redemption and any such requests and all pending requests will not be honored or retained, but will be returned to the requestor. Effective March 25, 2021, the Company’s Board of Directors reopened the SRP solely for redemptions submitted in connection with a stockholder’s death and set the price for all such purchases to $9.42, which is 100% of the NAV per Share. Deaths that occurred subsequent to January 1, 2020 are eligible for consideration. Beginning January 1, 2022, requests for redemptions in connection with a stockholder’s death must be submitted and received by the Company within one year of the stockholder’s date of death for consideration. On an annual basis, the Company will not redeem in excess of 0.5% of the number of shares outstanding as of the The Company’s board of directors will continue to consider the liquidity available to stockholders going forward, balanced with other long-term interests of the stockholders and the Company. It is possible that in the
Distributions The Company made an election to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2008. U.S. federal tax law requires a REIT distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP) determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. In order to continue to qualify for REIT status,
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar
Advisor and The Company has agreements with the Advisor and its affiliates leasing agreement. The following discussion describes the fees and expenses payable to
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar
Lightstone Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollar
As of December 31,
Advance from Advisor
On March
****
EXHIBIT INDEX
|