UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON,Washington, DC 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 orOR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192021

 

OR

 

  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission File Number 0-12305For the transition period from ____________ to __________

 

Commission file number 0-12305

REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

NEW YORK13-3044880

NEW YORK

13-3044880

(State or Other Jurisdictionother jurisdiction of Incorporationincorporation or Organization)

organization)

(IRSI.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

24 CARPENTER ROAD, CHESTER, NY

10918

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

 

(845)-469-2042(845)-469-2042

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Codetelephone number, including area code

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

Trading symbol(s)

Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

common stock, $0.01 par value

KRMD

The Nasdaq Stock Market


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE

(Title of Class)

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  No 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T  (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files.) Yes  No 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No

 

Based on the closing sales price of June 28, 2019,30, 2021, the aggregate market value of the voting and nonvoting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $54,741,695.$120,485,383.

 

The numberAs of issued and outstandingFebruary 28, 2022, 44,671,160 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value was 39,686,746 at March 4, 2020,per share, were outstanding, which excludes 2,737,2313,420,502 shares of Treasury Stock.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statementproxy statement for the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated herein by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent stated herein. Such proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.2021.

 



REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10-K

INDEX


Page

Page

PART I

PART I

Item 1.

Business

1

Item 1.

Business

3

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

8

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

7

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

18

23

Item 2.

Properties

18

23

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

18

23

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

20

23

PART II

Item 5.

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

20

23

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

20

24

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

20

24

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

25

29

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

25

29

Item 9.

Changes Inin and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

41

48

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

42

48

Item 9B.

Other Information

42

49

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

42

49

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

42

49

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

42

49

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

42

49

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

43

49

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

43

50

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

43

51

Signatures

44

52


- 2ii -



PART I


Throughout this report, “KORU,” the “Company,” “KORU Medical,” “KORU,” “we,” “us” andor “our” refer to Repro Med Systems, Inc. d/b/a KORU Medical Systems.


FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS


This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisionsSection 27A of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as: “believe”,“believe,” “plan,” “goal,” “intend,” “seek,” “positions,“expect,“vision”, “confident,“will, “future,” “will” and similar references to future periods. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among others, statements we make regarding our ability to achieve our goals set forth in our Strategic Plan, under “Our MissionStrategy” in Business under Item 1 of this Form 10-K and under “Overview” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Item 7 of this Form 10-K, and statements regarding our move to defend pending litigation claims.the newly leased facility including continuity of product supply, compliance with EU MDR, transition to our secondary manufacturing source, and 2022 expenses, capital investments, and inventory levels. Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based only on our current beliefs, expectations, and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans and strategies, projections, anticipated events and trends, the economy and other future conditions.  Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control.  Our actual results and financial condition may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Therefore, readers should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements.


Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements include, among others, those discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in particular, the risks discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in Item 1A, and those discussed in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).


Any forward-looking statement made by us in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is based only on information currently available to us and speaks only as of the date on which it is made.  We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.


ITEM 1. BUSINESS


OUR BUSINESS


REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a KORU Medical Systems (“KORU Medical,” “KORU”, the “Company” “our” or “we”), designs, manufactures and markets proprietary portable and innovative portable medical devices, primarily for the ambulatory infusion market in compliance withas governed by the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) quality and regulatory system and international standards for quality system management. Our development and marketing focus is primarily concentrated on our mechanical infusion products, the FREEDOM Infusion Systems (which we refer to as the “FREEDOM System” when used with one or more accessories), which include the FREEDOM60® Syringe Driver, the FreedomEdge® Syringe Driver, HIgH-Flo Subcutaneous Safety Needle SetsSets™ and Precision Flow Rate TubingTubing™.  The Company incorporated

Our revenues derive from three business sources: (i) domestic core, (ii) international core, and (iii) novel therapies.  Our core domestic and international revenues consist of sales of our products for the delivery of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (“SCIg”) to treat Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (“PIDD”), Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”), and other disease states that are FDA cleared for use with the KORU Medical syringe driver. Novel therapies consist of product revenues related to the sales of our infusion system (syringe drivers, tubing and needles) for feasibility/clinical trials (pre-clinical studies, Phase I, Phase II, Phase III) of biopharmaceutical companies in the State of New York in March 1980.drug development process as well as non-recurring engineering services revenues received from biopharmaceutical companies to ready or customize the FREEDOM System for clinical and commercial use.


OUR MISSION


Our mission is to improve the quality of life of patients around the world by delivering innovative, effective, and easy-to-use drug delivery systems that can be used at home or alternate site settings.settings, for patient self-administration of drug therapy.


OUR STRATEGY


In January 2019, the Board of Directors approved our strategicWe plan to become the preferred drug delivery partnerleading provider of solutions for specific infusion therapies in select markets.subcutaneous large-volume infusions defined as greater than 10ml . We intend to accomplish this objective by building on the market leading positionincreasing penetration of our FREEDOM®60 Syringe Infusion System that allows for the self-administration ofcore SCIg market and extending into new subcutaneous immunoglobulin (“SCIg”) to treat Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PIDD), Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP), and other disease states.drug therapies.


- 1 -


We have identified multiple factors driving growth of the SCIg market. These include:

Increasing diagnoses of Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (“PIDD”), which often require Ig treatment
New on-label indications for SCIg drugs such as Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”), Secondary Immunodeficiencies (“SID”), and others in clinical development
Increase in the number of available SCIg medications such as the introduction of Cutaquig® and Xembify® in the United States and Europe, planned launches of Cuvitru® and HyQvia® in Japan, and others
Biopharmaceutical investment in SCIg products, such as prefilled syringe formats that make infusion easier for patients, which may make more patients eligible for SCIg therapy
Increasing supply of donated plasma, which increases the global supply of Ig medications
Favorable patient preference, side effect profile, and health economics for at-home SCIg compared with IVIg therapy

We intend to capitalize on multiple industry growth drivers, including a growing demand formaintain and accelerating development ofextend our leadership position in the SCIg increasing awareness of PIDDmarket through clinical and CIDP,product innovation and commercial excellence. By improving our products, establishing thought leadership in subcutaneous therapy, partnering with SCIg drug manufacturers, expanding geographically, and executing commercially we intend to increase our overall global share position and the ongoing shift from institutional care to home and alternate site settings.  We plan to continue to support the product demand for the accelerating adoptionnumber of Hizentra®, Cuvitru®, Xembify® and other formulations of SCIg therapy, and participate in the migration of other therapeutics into the global home health marketplace.patients prescribed SCIg.


- 3 -



Furthermore, we plan to leverageexpand into new therapies outside of SCIg. We estimate that at least 100 large-volume drugs are in clinical development utilizing subcutaneous infusion. The pipeline is driven by the need to deliver high therapeutic doses, difficulty in formulating large molecules into small volumes, patient preference for and superior economics of subcutaneous infusion over intravenous infusion, the COVID-19 pandemic causing pharmaceutical companies to shift development programs toward at-home SC therapy, and other factors. Biopharmaceutical manufacturers seek device partners during the drug development process. We intend to partner with them during clinical development—generating services revenues to prepare and customize our specialty pharmacy customer baseproducts for clinical use and regulatory clearance and product revenues by introducing additional innovative productsselling devices for evaluations and services toclinical use—and, subsequently, commercialization.

Our track record of regulatory clearance and successful patient use combined with our channel with a focus on value based health care, which includes clinical and cost advantages and user friendly products with compliance/data focused characteristics.  We are focused on identifying new entrants intoaccess position KORU to both maximize our growth in the SCIgcore SCIG market and outside the immunoglobulin space, where we can supply our infusion system in their clinical trials and ultimately commercialization.expand into new therapeutic areas.


The financial goals for our strategic plan through 2022 are:


$50 million net revenue run rate

70%+ gross margins, and

20%+  annual organic revenue growth


OUR PRODUCTS


FREEDOM SYSTEM


The FREEDOM System comprises the FREEDOM60 Syringe Driver (standard 60/50ml syringe compatible) and FreedomEdge Syringe Driver (standard 30ml and 20ml syringe and prefilled syringe compatible), HIgH-Flo Subcutaneous Safety Needle Sets and Precision Flow Rate Tubing.  The systems are portable, easy to operate, maintenance free and do not require batteries or electricity. The FREEDOM System operates at a lower pressure than an electrical, volumetric pump and maintains a balance between what a patient’s subcutaneous tissues are able tocan absorb and what the system delivers, or what we refer to as DynEq®.


The FDA issued a 510(k) clearance for the KORU “Integrated Catch-Up Freedom Syringe Driver Infusion System,” which is our FREEDOM System, effective August 31, 2017, which includes the Precision Flow Tubing and our HIgH-Flo Subcutaneous Safety Needle Sets.  The FREEDOM System is cleared by the FDA for a wide range of flow rates and certain medications for subcutaneous and intravenous indications, including specific clearance for leading immune globulins that includeCutaquig ®, Cuvitru®, Hizentra®, and Cuvitru®Xembify® and a variety of antibiotics. The FDA clearance (No. K162613) includesFREEDOM System is the only infusion system specifically cleared for use with a Caution Statement regarding FDA’s approved proper use.prefilled syringe, the Hizentra® 20ml prefilled syringe.


Ambulatory infusion systems are most prevalent in the home care and alternate site markets.  The use of the FREEDOM System for treatment of PIDD through SCIg administration continues to increase and remains the market leading delivery system in the U.S. for these infusions.  There is an expanded indication for Hizentra® for patients with CIDP which is an acquired immune-mediated inflammatory disorder of the peripheral nervous system.  It is expected that new SCIg drugs may enter the market.  We believe the FREEDOM System is an ideal system for SCIg administration because:


the patient is able to self-administer in any location;

the system has less adverse events;

the pump is easily configured for this application;

it is the best value infusion system available in a heavily cost constrained market; and

it has demonstrated ultimate effectiveness and an impeccable safety profile.

from millions of patient infusions.


- 2 -


HIgH-Flo Subcutaneous Safety Needle Sets are a critical element of the FREEDOM System, are available in 26- and 24-gauge sizes and feature unique design elements specific to subcutaneous self-administration.  One such feature includes a back-cut needle designed for more comfort and less tissue damage with flexible wings to minimize patient discomfort.


Precision Flow Rate Tubing is designed for repeatable flow rates and will not allow any free-flow, bolus or overdose of medication.without allowing unrestricted flow.  The tubing regulates the flow rate and infusion time for various applications when used with the FREEDOM System.  Each tubing set provides a different level of flow restriction and consistently delivers medication with low residual volume to minimize drug waste.


SALES AND DISTRIBUTION


The FREEDOM System is sold through both direct sales and medical device distributors to specialty pharmacy customers and home infusion providers.  Our products and those of our competitors are sold principally through a small number of distributors so our specialty pharmacy customers receive the benefit of remote inventory management and one-stop shopping.  We sell mostthe majority of our products through two distributors in the U.S. and two distributors outside the U.S.  As of December 31, 2019,2021, these four distributors comprised approximately 67%62% of our net revenues.revenues with one of our U.S. distributors contributing approximately 41%.


Specialty pharmacies, and home infusion providers, and distributors are our primary call point,points, although we provide education and training materials to clinicians, patients and patient advocates both in the field and online.


- 4 -



MANUFACTURING AND RAW MATERIALS


We currently perform product assembly, calibration, pre- and post-assembly quality control inspection and testing, and final packaging for all of our products at our Chester, NY facility.facility and expect to continue such activities for certain of our products at our newly leased facility in Mahwah, NJ commencing on or about June 2022.  In the fourth quarter of 2020, we entered into an agreement with Command Medical Products, Inc. (“Command”), to manufacture and supply the Company’s subassemblies, needle sets and tubing products for supply continuity and cost savings. We expect the transition to Command to be completed in July 2022.


Our ability to meet customer demand depends, in part, on our ability to obtain timely and adequate delivery of components for our products. All of the components that go into the manufacturing of our products and accessories are sourced from third-party suppliers and some of these components areon a single source including subassembliesbasis. We believe alternative sources of supply for all equivalent materials are available from Command Medical Products, Inc., molded plastic parts from aother sources or can be produced by the Company, and the Company does not believe it is substantially dependent on any suppliers. The Company uses single-source suppliers in part due to governmental approval and validation requirements. A change in supplier, in Taiwanor the use of multiple suppliers of the same materials, often would necessitate additional approvals and tubing from Natvar, a Tekni-Plex Co., Inc.validations, which the Company seeks to avoid unless and until the need arises. The Company does not have any contracts with suppliers that impose material binding obligations on the Company or provide the Company with any material rights or benefits, other than the agreement with Command.


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT


We recognize the importance of innovation to our long-term success and are committed to research and new product development activities.  Our product development team along with outside engineering resources isare engaged in continuously improving existing product performance and researching new product opportunities to increaseenhance our pipeline.product portfolio.  We spent $0.7$2.5 million and $1.3 million on research and development for the yearyears ended December 31, 2019,2021 and $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020, respectively.  We intend to make additional investments in research and development over the next twelve months.


REGULATORY


Our medical devices and technologies, as well as our business activities, are subject to a complex set of regulations and rigorous enforcement, includingprincipally by the U.S. Department of Justice, Health and Human Services-Office of the Inspector General,FDA, and numerous other federal, state, and non-U.S. governmental authorities.  To varying degrees, each of these agencies requires us to comply with laws and regulations governing the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, marketing and distribution of our products.


BothThe FDA regulates, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacturing, approval, labeling, storage, recordkeeping, advertising, promotion and marketing, distribution, post approval monitoring and reporting and import and export of medical devices in the U.S. to assure the safety and effectiveness of medical products for their intended use.  Thus, both before and after a product is commercially released, we have ongoing responsibilities under the FDA and other applicable non-U.S. government agency regulations.FDA. For instance, all medical devices marketed in the U.S. must be manufactured in accordance with the FDA’s quality system regulations.regulations (“QSRs”).  Accordingly, our facility and procedures and those of our suppliers are also subject to periodic inspections by the FDA to determine compliance with applicable laws and regulations.  The Federal Trade Commission also regulates the advertising of our products.  Further, we are subject to laws directed at preventing fraud and abuse, which subject our sales and marketing, training and other practices to government scrutiny.


- 3 -


Our business is also affected by patient privacy laws and government payor cost containment initiatives, as well as environmental health and safety laws and regulations.

U.S. Device Classification and Clearance

Except where an exemption applies, each new or significantly modified medical device we seek to commercially distribute in the U.S. will require either a premarket notification to the FDA requesting permission for commercial distribution under Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FFDCA”), also known as a 510(k) clearance, or approval of a pre-market approval (“PMA”) application.  For example, the use of our FREEDOM System with therapies not covered by the existing FDA clearance will require additional 510(k) clearance or PMA approval.

Under the 510(k) process, applicants must demonstrate to the FDA that a device is as safe and effective as, or substantially equivalent to, a legally marketed device, known as the “predicate” device.  Applicants must submit performance data to establish substantial equivalence.  In some instances, data from human clinical trials must also be submitted in support of a 510(k), and these data must be collected in a manner that conforms to the applicable Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”) regulations.  The FDA must issue a substantial equivalence determination before commercial distribution can occur.  Changes to cleared devices that will not significantly affect the safety or effectiveness of the device can generally be made without additional 510(k) submissions.  Changes that will significantly affect the safety or effectiveness of the device will require a new 510(k) prior to marketing of the modified device. Notably, the FDA has announced its intention to pursue comprehensive reforms to its current 510(k) clearance pathway which is used for clearance of low- to moderate-risk devices that are substantially equivalent to a device already on the market, and to its post-market safety monitoring process.  We cannot predict with any certainty how these reforms may impact our business.  See ITEM“ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.


Under the PMA application process, the applicant must demonstrate that the device is safe and effective for its intended use.  This approval process applies to most Class III devices, and generally requires clinical data to support the safety and effectiveness of the device, obtained in conformance with IDE regulations.  The FDA will approve a PMA application if it finds that there is a reasonable assurance that the device is safe and effective for its intended purpose, and that the proposed manufacturing is in compliance with the QSRs.  For novel technologies, the FDA will seek input from an advisory panel of medical experts regarding the safety and effectiveness of, and their benefit-risk analysis for the device.  The PMA process is generally more detailed, lengthier and more expensive than the 510(k) process, though both processes can be expensive and lengthy, and requires payment of significant user fees, unless an exemption is available.

We are also required to comply with the regulations of every other country where we commercialize products before we can launch or maintain new products on the market.  Many countries that previously did not have medical device regulations, or had minimal regulations, are now introducing them.

International sales of medical devices manufactured in the U.S. that are not approved by the FDA for use in the U.S., or that are banned or deviate from lawful performance standards, are subject to FDA export requirements.  Additionally, exported devices are subject to the regulatory requirements of each country to which the device is exported.  Some countries do not have medical device regulations, but in most foreign countries, medical devices are regulated.  Frequently, regulatory approval may first be obtained in a foreign country prior to application in the U.S. due to differing regulatory requirements; however, other countries require approval in the country of origin first.  Most countries outside of the U.S. require that product approvals be recertified on a regular basis, generally every five years.  The recertification process requires that we evaluate any device changes and any new regulations or standards relevant to the device and, where needed, conduct appropriate testing to document continued compliance.  Where recertification applications are required, they must be approved in order to continue selling our products in those countries.

Post-Approval Regulation

Even after a device is cleared or approved by FDA for marketing, numerous regulatory requirements continue to apply.  The FDA and other worldwide regulatory agencies and competent authorities actively monitor compliance to local laws and regulations through review and inspection of design and manufacturing practices, record-keeping, reporting of adverse events, labeling and promotional practices.  The FDA can ban certain medical devices, detain or seize adulterated or misbranded medical devices, order repair, replacement or refund of these devices and require notification of health professionals and others with regard to medical devices that present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health.  The FDA may also enjoin and restrain a company for certain violations of the FFDCA and the Safe Medical Devices Act pertaining to medical devices or initiate action for criminal prosecution of such violations.  In addition, FDA and other governmental agencies such as the Department of Justice can take action against a company that promotes “off-label” uses.  Regulatory agencies and authorities in the countries where we do business can halt production in or distribution within their respective country or otherwise take action in accordance with local laws and regulations.  Any adverse regulatory action, depending on its magnitude, may restrict a company from effectively marketing and selling its products, may limit a company’s ability to obtain future premarket clearances or approvals, and could result in a substantial modification to a company’s business practices and operations.

- 4 -


Manufacturing Regulation

We must also comply with FDA and foreign agency regulations governing medical device manufacturing practices.  The FDA and foreign agencies require manufacturers to register their establishments, and they monitor compliance with device manufacturing requirements through inspections of manufacturing facilities.  If an investigator observes conditions that might be violative, the manufacturer must correct those conditions or explain them satisfactorily or face potential regulatory action that might include physical removal of the product from the marketplace.  We are an FDA-registered medical device manufacturer and must demonstrate that we comply with the FDA’s QSR and Current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMPs”).

We believe that our products and procedures are in compliance with all applicable FDA and international regulations.  There is no assurance, however, that other products we are developing or products that we may develop in the future will be cleared by the FDA and classified as Class II products, or that additional regulations restricting the sale of our present or proposed products will not be promulgated by the FDA or other foreign agencies.  In addition, changes in FDA, or other federal or state health, environmental or safety regulations or their applications could adversely affect our business.

Other Healthcare Laws

We are subject to additional healthcare regulation and enforcement by the federal government and by authorities in the states and foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct our business.  These laws include:

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, in exchange for or to induce either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service for which payment may be made under federal healthcare programs, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs.  A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation;
federal false claims laws which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal third-party payors that are false or fraudulent.  In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act;
the federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which prohibits, among other things, offering or transferring remuneration to a federal healthcare beneficiary that a person knows or should know is likely to influence the beneficiary’s decision to order or receive items or services reimbursable by the government from a particular provider or supplier;
federal criminal laws that prohibit executing a scheme to defraud any federal healthcare benefit program or making false statements relating to healthcare matters;
the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, which governs the conduct of certain electronic healthcare transactions and protects the security and privacy of protected health information;
the federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act, which requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) information related to payments or other “transfers of value” made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), certain health care professionals beginning in 2022, and teaching hospitals and ownership and investment interests held by the physicians described above and their immediate family members, and payments or other “transfers of value” to such physician owners; and
analogous state and foreign law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers; state laws that require pharmaceutical and device companies to comply with the industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the applicable compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; state laws that require device manufacturers to track and report information related to payments and other “transfers of value” to physicians and other healthcare providers or pricing, marketing expenditures and information; and state laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts.

- 5 -


Violations of any of the laws described above include civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, the curtailment or restructuring of an entity’s operations, the debarment, suspension or exclusion from federal and state healthcare programs and/or imprisonment.

Coverage and Reimbursement

Our profitability and operations are subject to changes in legislative, regulatory and reimbursement policies and decisions as well as changes in private payer reimbursement coverage and payment decisions and policies.  Our products are purchased by specialty pharmacies and ambulatory service providers or hospitals that typically bill various third-party payors, such as governmental programs (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, and comparable non-U.S. programs), private insurance plans and managed care plans, for the healthcare services and products provided to their patients.  The ability of our customers to obtain appropriate coverage and reimbursement for our products and the drugs they administer is critical because it affects which products customers purchase and the price they are willing to pay.  Third-party payors are increasingly reducing coverage and reimbursement for certain healthcare services and products and challenging prices charged for healthcare services and products.

Environmental Health and Safety Laws

We are required to comply with federal, state, and local environmental laws; however, there is no significant effect of compliance on capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position.  We do not use significant amounts of hazardous materials in the assembly of our products.


COMPETITION AND THE MARKET


Competition for the FreedomFREEDOM System includes electronic (volumetric) pumps, elastomeric (“infuser”) pumps, and at least one other fully mechanical pump.pumps as well as other types of pumps.  Safety, ease of use, familiarity, cost effectiveness, accuracy, pressure, etc. are driving influencers of pump selection.  Electronic pumps deliver drugs at a programmed flow rate.  They are expensivemore costly and require electricity or batteries, extensive training and maintenance and must be programmed by a qualified pharmacist or clinician. Elastomeric pumps are one-time-use balloon type devices used for infusion of drugs in intravenous (“IV”) and surgical wound site applications.  Pharmacies are required to fill them with drugs and deliver them to the patient.  They are easy to use from the patient point of view but can be more costly and time consuming to fill, are temperature sensitive and have larger residual volumes than other delivery systems. Other

Competition for infusion devices for new drugs includes a variety of technologies and companies. No single technological approach—autoinjectors, electronic (volumetric pumps), mechanical pumps, can be less expensive but may have larger residualneedle-free injectors, on-body wearable pumps, pen injectors, and pre-filled syringes—will meet the needs of all or even a majority of drugs. For drugs requiring infusion volumes over 3 ml, the segment most similar to the SCIg drugs currently delivered by the FREEDOM System, the most relevant approaches include mechanical pumps, on-body wearable pumps, and lower performance than ours.simple electronic pumps. Challenges to their successful commercialization include high costs per infusion, increased environmental impact, complexity for users, and complex mechanisms with multiple failure modes.


EMPLOYEESHUMAN CAPITAL RESOURCES


As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had 7177 full time employees and 0no part time employees.  As of December 31, 2021, approximately 57% of the Company’s workforce was female and approximately 20% of the Company’s employees in managerial roles were female.  Approximately 41% were minorities (non-White) in the Company workforce as of December 31, 2021.  None of our employees are represented by a collective bargaining agreement.


To help drive consistent execution of our business strategy, including our customer focused philosophy, and support their development, we provide training opportunities to our employees that align with their responsibilities over their career with us.  We maintain a dedicated Internet-based learning platform with a broad portfolio of written, audio-visual and interactive enterprise-wide and discipline-specific policy and training materials.  This platform includes a library of self-directed courses and virtual, instructor-led programs for employees at all levels of our organization.  Managers and supervisors are provided training to help their employees progress in their professional development.

We believe our employees are key to achieving our business objectives.  We have COVID-19 prevention protocols in place to minimize the spread of COVID-19 in our workplace.  These protocols, which remain in place, meet or exceed the Centers for Disease Control guidelines and where applicable, state mandates.

Our key human capital measures include employee safety, turnover, absenteeism and production.  We frequently benchmark our compensation practices and benefits programs against those of comparable industries and in the geographic areas where our facilities are located.  We believe that our compensation and employee benefits are competitive and allow us to attract and retain skilled and unskilled labor throughout our organization.  Our notable health, welfare and retirement benefits include:

- 56 -



Company subsidized health insurance
401(k) Plan with Company matching contributions
Paid time off
Life and disability insurance

We strive to maintain an inclusive environment free from discrimination of any kind, including sexual or other discriminatory harassment.  Our employees have multiple avenues available through which inappropriate behavior can be reported, including a confidential hotline.  All reports of inappropriate behavior are promptly investigated with appropriate action taken to stop such behavior.

PATENTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY


We filed and received U.S. and foreign protection for many of our products relating to infusion systems and related components. We had seven patentsone patent granted in the U.S. and seveneleven foreign patents granted outside the U.S. in 2019.2021.  As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had elevenhave six applications pending in the U.S. and 4513 applications pending in foreign jurisdictions.  Expiration dates for the entire patent portfolio range (US & Foreign) from 2022 to 2037.2038. In some cases where it was no longer deemed economically beneficial, we have allowed certain patent and/or trademark protections to lapse.  In addition, the patent application process for both the U.S. and foreign countries is highly uncertain and involves complex legal and factual issues that differ from country to country.Consequently, there can be no assurance that patent applications relating to products or technology will result in patents being granted or that, if issued, the patents will afford protection against competitors with similar technology.  There can be no assurance that we will have the financial resources necessary to enforce any patent rights we may hold. See ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS for details regarding our patent litigation.


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our executive officers as of March 4, 2020:2, 2022:


NameAge

Name

Age

Position / Held Since

Linda Tharby

53

Donald B. Pettigrew

52

President and Chief Executive Officer and President (since February 2019)

April 2021)

President and Chief Commercial Officer (from September 2018-February 2019)

Karen Fisher

53

55

Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer (since 2015)

Manuel Marques

47

49

Chief Operating Officer (since December 2018)


Executive officers hold office at the discretion of the Board of Directors.


Mr. PettigrewMs. Tharby was appointed as President and CEO in April 2021. Ms. Tharby has more than 23over 25 years of salesexecutive leadership experience building and business development experienceleading strong performing global organizations that develop and commercialize products and service innovations, while delivering solutions to patients in the medical device industry, including the home infusion space.setting. Prior to joining KORU, Ms. Tharby spent the last 24 years working in various roles of increased responsibility at Becton Dickinson (“BD”). Ms. Tharby was a member of the Executive Leadership team of BD that transformed the company from an $8 billion medical supplies company to an $18 billion global medical technology company. Ms. Tharby’s most recent role at BD was Chief Customer Experience Officer from July 2018 Mr. Pettigrew held senior leadership positions at market leading medical firms suchthrough December 2020. In her prior role, as Moog, Inc. as Group Director, Global Business DevelopmentBD’s Chief Human Resources Officer, from October 2016 through July 2018, she led the company through its $24 billion acquisition and Group Director, Global Sales and Professional Services from 2011 through 2018, where he led commercialization and business development for the IV infusion and enteral feeding franchisesintegration of C.R. Bard in both the U.S. and international markets.  Mr. Pettigrew2017. She also held management positionsnumerous global business leadership roles at Baxter (formerly Gambro)BD, including Executive Vice President and President of Life Sciences, Group President of Pre-Analytical Systems and Biosciences, Worldwide President of Diabetes Care, and Vice President/General Manager of Pharmaceutical Systems. Ms. Tharby has an Honors Bachelor of Business Administration from 2008-2011, Boston Scientific from 1995-2008, and E&J Gallo from 1990-1995.  Mr. Pettigrew earned his B.A.Wilfrid Laurier University in Biology from the University of Colorado.  Waterloo, Ontario Canada.


Ms. Fisher has more than 2526 years of financial experience at a variety of industries.  Prior to joining KORU in 2015, Ms. Fisher was Assistant Controller, Senior Manager for Armored Autogroup, Inc., a worldwide consumer products company from February 2012 to January 2015.company.  Before joining Armored Autogroup, Inc., she spent seven years at Gilman Ciocia, Inc., where she served in a variety of financial roles, including Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer, and, earlier, as Controller. Before Gilman Ciocia, Inc., she held multiple financial management roles at The New York Times Company and Thomson Financial.  Ms. Fisher is a Certified Public Accountant and a graduate of Arizona State University with a B.S. in accounting.


Mr. Marques was appointed as Chief Operating Officer in December 2018.  Prior to that, Mr. Marques served as our Vice President of Operations and Engineering sincefrom February 2016 and joined KORU as Director of Manufacturing and Manufacturing Engineering in July 2015. Prior to joining KORU, Mr. Marques Servedserved as Lean Manufacturing Champion at Nobel Biocare Procera LLC, a manufacturer of dental implants and CAD/CAM-based individualized prosthetics, from February 2013 until joining KORU.  Mr. Marques has over 2324 years of experience within the dental, medical device, and automotive industries, and holds two U.S. patents for cardiovascular medical devices.  Mr. Marques obtained a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology and also an M.S. in Engineering Management from the New Jersey Institute of Technology.


- 67 -



ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS


RISK FACTORS


An investment in our common stock involves significant risks.  Before making an investment in our common stock, you should carefully consider all of the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other filings with the SEC including the material risks and uncertainties that we have identified below.  The risks and uncertainties identified below are not the only risks and uncertainties we face.  If any of the material risks or uncertainties that we face were to occur, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you could lose part or all of your investment.  Please note that additional risks not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may adversely affect our business, operations, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.


Risks Related to Our Business


If we are unable to successfully introduce new products or fail to keep pace with advances in technology, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We need to successfully introduce new products to achieve our strategic business objectives.  A significant element of our strategy is to increase revenue growth by investing in innovation and new product development, which will require substantial resources.  Our successful product development will depend on many factors, including our ability to attract strong talent to lead our research and development efforts, properly anticipate and satisfy customer needs, adapt to new technologies, obtain regulatory concurrence on a timely basis, demonstrate satisfactory clinical results, manufacture products in an economical and timely manner, obtain appropriate intellectual property protection for our products, gain and maintain market acceptance of our products, and differentiate our products from those of our competitors.  In addition, patents attained by others can preclude or delay our commercialization of a product. There can be no assurance that any products now in development or that we may seek to develop in the future will achieve technological feasibility, obtain regulatory concurrence or gain market acceptance.  If we cannot successfully introduce new products or adapt to changing technologies, our products may become obsolete, and our revenue and profitability could suffer.

Our business depends on an adequate supply of drugs to be administered by our products.

Demand for our products depends on the availability of drugs to be administered by them.  Currently, most of our products require immunoglobulin therapies that rely on blood plasma collection for drugs such as Hizentra® and Cuvitru®.  Any disruption in the supply of these drugs for any reason, including contamination, could significantly adversely affect our business.  The change of any drug indication by the FDA or comparable foreign governmental agencies could also result in decreased demand for our products.  In addition, pharmaceutical companies and other competitors have or are developing alternative therapies for disease states that are deliverable without a medical device.  The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the collection of plasma, the source of the active ingredient of SCIg medications, which may limit the supply of these drugs. If there is not an adequate supply of drugs requiring administration by medical devices such as those provided by us or alternative therapies are developed, our sales may suffer and/or our products may become obsolete.

Our compliance with EU MDR regulations by May 2024 will require significant investment and, if we are not in compliance by that time, we will not be able to sell our products in the EU.

In the European Union (“EU”), we are required to comply with the new Medical Device Regulation (“MDR” or “EU MDR”) effective May 2021, which supersedes the prior Medical Device Directives. Medical devices which have a valid CE certificate to the current Medical Device Directives (issued before May 2021), as do all of our current products, can continue to be sold until May 2024 or until the CE certificate expires, whichever comes first, providing there are no significant changes as defined in Article 120 of EU MDR. The MDR was published in May 2017 with a 3-year transition period. That transition period was extended to May 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The CE mark required to sell medical devices in the EU is affixed following conformity assessment and either approval from an appointed independent notified body or through self-certification by the manufacturer. The selected pathway to CE marking is based on product risk classification. CE marking indicates conformity to the applicable essential requirements of the relevant Medical Device Directives and in the future to the general safety and performance requirements for the new MDR. The MDR will change multiple aspects of the existing regulatory framework for CE marking, such as increased clinical evidence requirements and other new requirements, including Unique Device Identification (“UDI”) as well as many other post-market obligations. MDR also significantly modifies and increases the compliance requirements for the industry and will require significant investment by us in the near future to implement.

If we are unable to comply with the MDR by May 2024, we will not be able to sell our products in the EU, which will materially impact our net revenues.

- 8 -


Interruption of our manufacturing operations, including due to transitioning to our new facility, could adversely affect our future revenues and operating income.

The FDA and other U. S. and non-U.S. government agencies regulate our manufacturing operations, which includes product assembly, calibration, pre- and post-assembly quality control inspection and testing, and final packaging for all of our products. Variations in the manufacturing process may result in production failures which could lead to launch delays, product shortage, unanticipated costs, lost revenues and damage to our reputation.  A failure to identify and address manufacturing problems prior to the release of products to our customers may also result in a quality or safety issue that could result in a recall or other inability to sell our products.

Our products are currently manufactured and stored at our corporate headquarters and manufacturing facility. Products are also stored in storage facilities in the local NY area.  Loss or damage to our manufacturing and storage sites due to weather, vandalism, terrorism, a natural disaster, issues in our manufacturing process, equipment failure or other factors, could adversely affect our ability to manufacture sufficient quantities of products or otherwise deliver products to meet customer demand or contractual requirements which may result in a loss of revenue and other adverse business consequences, including damage to our relationship with customers.

We take precautions to safeguard our facility and storage site, including acquiring insurance, adopting health and safety protocols and utilizing off-site storage of computer data.  Our insurance may not cover our losses in any particular case.  In addition, regardless of the level of insurance coverage, damage to our facilities may harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our business has been and could continue to be adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has and will continue affecting economies and businesses around the world.  We are closely monitoring the impact of COVID-19 on all aspects of our business, including how it may impact our employees and business operations.  While we did not incur significant manufacturing disruptions during 2021 from the COVID-19 pandemic, customer purchasing patterns and clinical trial activity have been less predictable. The COVID-19 pandemic has also impacted the rate of diagnosis of many conditions due to fewer infections causing patients to seek diagnosis, reduced access to healthcare professionals, and other factors including conditions treated by SCIg using the FREEDOM infusion system.  We also believe COVID-19 has precipitated limited availability and rising costs of raw materials and labor, which may impact our financial results if current trends continue. We may experience disruptions that could severely impact our results of operations and financial condition.  We are unable to predict the impact that COVID-19 will have on our future operating results and financial condition due to numerous uncertainties.  These uncertainties include the geographic spread of the pandemic, the severity of the virus, the impact of the virus directly on our employees or those of our suppliers, the duration of the outbreak, governmental actions, travel restrictions and social distancing, business closures or business disruptions (including those impacting our supply chain), delays in clinical trials, the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States and other countries to contain and treat the disease, the availability of plasma and drugs that are administered by our products, the number of new prescriptions for PIDD and CIDP, purchasing patterns of customers in response to the pandemic, changes to our operations, or whether the United States and additional countries are required to move to complete lock-down status, among others.  Our sales representatives are unable to hold in-person meetings with customers and health care providers to discuss our products, which may further impact our sales. As local jurisdictions continue to put restrictions in place, our ability to continue to manufacture our products may also be limited. Such events may result in a period of business and manufacturing disruption, and in reduced operations, any of which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.  The health of our workforce and our ability to meet staffing needs at our facility cannot be predicted and is vital to our operations.  We will continue to monitor the COVID-19 situation closely and intend to follow health and safety guidelines as they evolve.  Further, the spread of COVID-19, which has caused a broad impact globally, may materially affect us economically.  While the potential economic impact brought by, and the duration of, COVID-19 may be difficult to assess or predict, it has resulted in significant disruption of global financial markets, which could reduce our ability to access capital, negatively affecting our liquidity.  In addition, the recession resulting from the spread of COVID-19 could materially affect our business and the value of our common stock.  The ultimate long-term impact of COVID-19 is highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence.

We may be unable to compete successfully in our highly competitive industry.


We operate in a single market – ambulatory infusion – and are a global companydependent upon our success in that facesmarket. We face competition in our market from a wide range of international and domestic companies, including those that deliver electronic volumetric pumps, elastomeric infuser pumps and other mechanical devices.  These include large medical device companies with multiple product lines, some of which may have greater financial and marketing resources than we do.  We also face competition from companies that are even more specialized than ours with respect to particular markets or product lines.  Some of those companies have greater financial and sales and marketing resources than we do or offer products at a lower price point than ours.  In addition, former employees may develop products that are competitive with ours or capitalize on customer relationships developed while employed with us, subject to their continuing obligations under confidentiality agreements and other restrictive covenants that may survive their employment.  We face competition on the basis of product features, clinical or economic outcomes, product quality, availability, price, services, technological innovation and other factors.  In addition, we face changing customer preferences and requirements, changes in the ways health care services are delivered, including the transition of high-acuity care to lower-acuity, and non-acute care settings.

- 9 -


Competition may increase further as additional companies begin to enter our marketsmarket or modify their existing products to compete directly with ours.  If we are forced to reduce our prices due to increased competition, our business could suffer.


The medical technology industry has also experienced a significant amount of consolidation, resulting in larger companies with greater access to markets.  Health care systems, other health care companies and even retail pharmacies are also consolidating, resulting in greater purchasing power for these companies.  As a result, competition among medical device suppliers to provide goods and services has increased.  Group purchasing organizations and integrated health delivery networks have also served to concentrate purchasing decisions for some customers, which has led to downward pricing pressure for medical device suppliers.  Further consolidation in the industry could intensify competition among medical device suppliers and exert additional pressure on the prices of our products.


Consolidation in the medical industry could have a negative impact with payor and provider relationships and distributor relationships, as we could lose market share as consolidation occurs.


Technological developments by others may disrupt our business and negatively impact our revenues.


The medical device industry is subject to rapid technological change and discovery and frequent product introductions.  The development of new or improved products, processes or technologies by other companies that provide better features, pricing or clinical outcomes or economic value may render our products or proposed products obsolete or less competitive.  If our competitors respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or we do not introduce new versions or upgrades to our product portfolio in response to those requirements, our products may not be marketable.  If competitors develop more effective or affordable products or achieve earlier patent protection or product commercialization for new products than we do, our operations will likely be adversely affected.


If we are unable to successfully introduce new products or fail to keep pace with advances in technology, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.


We need to successfully introduce new products to achieve our strategic business objectives. A significant element of our strategy is to increase revenue growth by investing in innovation and new product development, which will require substantial resources. Our successful product development will depend on many factors, including our ability to attract strong talent to lead our research and development efforts, properly anticipate and satisfy customer needs, adapt to new technologies, obtain regulatory concurrence on a timely basis, demonstrate satisfactory clinical results, manufacture products in an economical and timely manner, obtain appropriate


- 7 -



intellectual property protection for our products, gain and maintain market acceptance of our products, and differentiate our products from those of our competitors. In addition, patents attained by others can preclude or delay our commercialization of a product. There can be no assurance that any products now in development or that we may seek to develop in the future will achieve technological feasibility, obtain regulatory concurrence or gain market acceptance.  If we cannot successfully introduce new products or adapt to changing technologies, our products may become obsolete and our revenue and profitability could suffer.


Proposed changes to the FDA 510(k) clearance pathway and post-market safety monitoring process could adversely affect our ability to offer our new and existing products.


The FDA has announced its intention to pursue comprehensive reforms to its current 510(k) clearance pathway, which is used for clearance of low- to moderate-risk devices that are substantially equivalent to a device already on the market, and to its post-market safety monitoring process.  The proposals, among other things, could prevent the use of certain older predicate devices as support for 510(k) clearance, provide for a “de novo” classification process to permit an evaluation of novel devices without a predicate device, establish an alternative 510(k) pathway for “well-understood” devices relying on objective safety and performance criteria, and expand post-market safety surveillance measures.  These reforms could delay or prevent us from obtaining or maintaining 510(k) clearances or other premarket authorizations for our existing or new devices.  Compliance with the new rules could require us to undertake significant additional costs prior to and following commercialization of our products, which may reduce the profitability of those products.  


We are subject to costly and complex laws and governmental regulations and any adverse regulatory action may materially adversely affect our financial condition and business operations.


Our medical devices and technologies, as well as our business activities, are subject to a complex set of regulations and rigorous enforcement, includingprincipally by the U.S. Department of Justice, Health and Human Services-Office of the Inspector General,FDA, and numerous other federal, state, and non-U.S. governmental authorities.  To varying degrees, each of these agencies requires us to comply with laws and regulations governing the design, development, and manufacturing; testing, manufacturing, labeling, content and language of instructions for use and storage; clinical trials; product safety; establishment registration and device listing; marketing, promotion, and distribution of our products. products; premarket clearance and approval; record keeping procedures; advertising and promotion; recalls and field safety corrective actions; post-market surveillance, including reporting of deaths or serious injuries and malfunctions that, if they were to recur, could lead to death or serious injury; post-market approval studies; and product import and export.

In the U.S., our device products are subject to clearance or approval by FDA under the FFDCA.  Before we can market a new medical device, or a new use of, new claim for, or significant modification to, an existing product, we must first receive either 510(k) clearance or approval of a PMA application from the FDA, unless an exemption applies.  Under the 510(k) process, the manufacturer must submit to the FDA a premarket notification, demonstrating that the device is “substantially equivalent,” as defined in the statute, to a legally marketed predicate device.  To be “substantially equivalent,” the proposed device must have the same intended use as the predicate device, and either have the same technological characteristics as the predicate device or have different technological characteristics and not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness than the predicate device.  If the manufacturer is unable to demonstrate substantial equivalence to FDA’s satisfaction, or if there is no available predicate device, then the manufacturer may be required to seek approval through the PMA application process, which is generally more costly and time consuming than the 510(k) process.  Through the PMA application process, the applicant must submit data and information demonstrating reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use.  Accordingly, a PMA application typically includes, but is not limited to, extensive technical information regarding device design and development, pre-clinical and clinical trial data, manufacturing information, labeling and financial disclosure information for the clinical investigators in device studies.

We cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain FDA 510(k) clearance or premarket approval for our new products or enhancements or modifications to existing products (including the use of our FREEDOM System with therapies not covered by the existing FDA clearance), and the failure to maintain approvals or clearances, or obtain approval or clearance could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Even if we are able to obtain approval or clearance, it may:


take a significant amount of time

require the expenditure of substantial resources

involve stringent clinical and pre-clinical testing, as well as increased post-market surveillance

involve modifications, repairs, or replacements of our products, and

limit the proposed uses of our products.


- 10 -


Both before and after a product is commercially released, we have ongoing responsibilities under the FDA and other applicable non-U.S. government agency laws and regulations.  For instance, all medical devices marketed in the U.S. must be manufactured in accordance with the FDA’s quality system regulations.  Accordingly, our facilityThe FDA and procedures and those of our suppliers are also subject to periodic inspections by the FDA to determineother worldwide regulatory agencies actively monitor compliance with applicable regulations.local laws and regulations through review and inspection of design and manufacturing practices, recordkeeping, reporting of adverse events, labeling and promotional practices.  The results of these inspections can include inspectional observations on the FDA’s Form 483, warning letters, or other forms of enforcement.  Additionally, as a manufacturer of medical devices, we are subject to annual registration and listing requirements, and associated user fees.  If the FDA, state or foreign regulatory authorities were to conclude that we are not in compliance with any applicable laws or regulations, or that any of our medical products are ineffective or pose an unreasonable health risk, the FDAthey could deem our products adulterated or misbranded, and take enforcement action against us.  FDA, state and foreign regulatory authorities have broad enforcement powers.  Possible enforcement actions include, but are not limited to:  banningtemporarily or permanently suspending the sale and/or distribution of such medical products; detaining or seizing all adulterated or misbranded medical products; ordering recall, repair, replacement, or refund of such products; refusing to grant pending pre-market approval or 510(k) clearance applications; and/or requiring us to notify health professionals and others that the devices present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health.  In addition, the FDA prohibits device manufacturers from promoting their products for uses and indications other than those set forth in the approved product labeling, and failure to comply with this prohibition could subject us to significant civil or criminal exposure, administrative obligations and costs, and/or other potential penalties from, and/or agreements with, the federal government.  The FDA and other non-U.S. government agencies may also assess civil or criminal penalties against us, our officers or employees and impose operating restrictions on a company-wide basis.  The FDA may also recommend prosecution to the U.S. Department of Justice.  Any adverse regulatory action, depending on its magnitude, may restrict us from effectively marketing and selling our products and limit our ability to obtain future pre-market clearances or approvals, and could result in a substantial modification to our business practices and operations.


In addition, the FDA has taken the position that device manufacturers are prohibited from promoting their products other than for the uses and indications set forth in the approved product labeling, and any failure to comply could subject us to significant civil or criminal exposure, administrative obligations and costs, and/or other potential penalties from, and/or agreements with, the federal government.


- 8 -



Regulations regarding the development, manufacture and sale of medical devices are evolving and subject to future change.Wechange and have tended to become more stringent over time.  Regulatory changes could result in restrictions on our ability to continue or expand our operations, higher than anticipated costs, or lower than anticipated sales. We cannot predict what impact, if any, those changes might have on our business; however, failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.  Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product or manufacturer could result in fines, delays or suspensions of regulatory clearances or approvals, seizures or recalls of products, physician advisories or other field actions, operating restrictions and/or criminal prosecution.  We may also initiate field actions as a result of a failure to strictly comply with our internal quality policies.  The failure to receive product approval clearance on a timely basis, suspensions of regulatory clearances, seizures or recalls of products, physician advisories or other field actions, or the withdrawal of product approval by the FDA or by comparable agencies in foreign countries could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.


Governmental regulations outside the U.S. have also, and may continue to, become increasingly stringent and common.  In the European Union,EU, for example, a new Medical Device RegulationMDR was published in 2017 which, when it enters into full force in 2020,May 2021, will include significant additional premarket and post-market requirements.  Penalties for regulatory non-compliance could be severe, including fines and revocation or suspension of a company’s EU business license, mandatory price reductionsdevice approval, ability to distribute products and criminal sanctions.  Future foreign governmental laws and regulations may have a material adverse effect on us.


In addition, exported devices are subject to the regulatory requirements of each country to which the device is exported.  Some countries do not have medical device regulations, but in most foreign countries, medical devices are regulated.  Frequently, regulatory approval may first be obtained in a foreign country prior to application in the U.S. due to differing regulatory requirements; however, other countries, such as China for example, require approval in the country of origin or legal manufacturer first.  Most countries outside of the U.S. require that product approvals be renewed or recertified on a regular basis, generally every four to five years.  The renewal or recertification process requires that we evaluate any device changes and any new regulations or standards relevant to the device and conduct appropriate testing to document continued compliance.  Where renewal or recertification applications are required, they may need to be renewed and/or approved in order to continue selling our products in those countries.  There can be no assurance that we will receive the required approvals for new products or modifications to existing products on a timely basis or that any approval will not be subsequently withdrawn or conditioned upon extensive post market study requirements.

Our global regulatory environment is becoming increasingly stringent and unpredictable, which could increase the time, cost and complexity of obtaining regulatory approvals for our products, as well as the clinical and regulatory costs of supporting those approvals.  Several countries that did not have regulatory requirements for medical devices have established such requirements in recent years and other countries have expanded on existing regulations.  Certain regulators are exhibiting less flexibility and are requiring local preclinical and clinical data in addition to global data.  While harmonization of global regulations has been pursued, requirements continue to differ significantly among countries.  In the United Kingdom, for example, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is responsible for regulating the UK medical device market.  With recent changes in the United Kingdom’s membership with the European Union, the MHRA has and will continue to impose new regulatory obligations becoming effective in 2021 through 2023, for medical device manufacturers.  We expect this global regulatory environment will continue to evolve, which could impact our ability to obtain future approvals for our products or could increase the cost and time to obtain such approvals in the future.

- 11 -


Our business and financial results may be materially adversely affected if our facility is not ready for manufacturing when the lease on our current facility expires in December 2022.

The lease on our current corporate headquarters and manufacturing facility expires in December 2022. We have entered into a lease for a new facility for our operations, and we expect to complete our move into that facility in June 2022. If we are unable to establish continuous manufacturing operations in our new facility before our existing lease expires, our revenues will suffer. We may not be able to establish such operations before our existing lease expires due to a number of factors, including delays in construction caused by raw materials, labor shortages and unforeseen complications; delays in receiving necessary regulatory approvals from U.S. and international authorities; unexpected manufacturing quality issues; inability to hire or retain necessary personnel; and other unforeseen circumstances. We have begun building our product inventory and expect to continue to do so through the second quarter of 2022, in order to ensure we can continue to service our customers in the event we are unable to maintain continuous manufacturing operations. Additionally, we have established Command as an alternate source of manufacturing as needed for continuity.

Proposed changes to the FDA 510(k) clearance pathway and post-market safety monitoring process could adversely affect our ability to offer our new and existing products.

As discussed above, the FDA’s and other regulatory authorities’ policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates.  In addition, the FDA may change its clearance and approval policies, adopt additional regulations or revise existing regulations, or take other actions which may prevent or delay approval or clearance of our future products under development.

In fact, the FDA has announced its intention to pursue comprehensive reforms to its current 510(k) clearance pathway, which is used for clearance of low- to moderate-risk devices that are substantially equivalent to a device already on the market, and to its post-market safety monitoring process.  In May 2019, the FDA solicited public feedback on its plans to develop proposals to drive manufacturers utilizing the 510(k) pathway toward the use of newer predicates, including whether the FDA should publish a list of devices that have been cleared on the basis of demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate devices that are more than 10 years old.  The FDA sought input on whether it should consider certain actions, such as whether to sunset certain older devices that were used as predicates under the 510(k)-clearance pathway.  These proposals have not yet been finalized or adopted, and the FDA may work with Congress to implement such proposals through legislation.  Accordingly, it is unclear the extent to which any proposals, if adopted, could impose additional regulatory requirements on us that could delay our ability to obtain new 510(k) clearances, increase the costs of compliance, or restrict our ability to maintain our current clearances, or otherwise create competition that may negatively affect our business.

In September 2019, the FDA finalized a guidance to describe an optional “safety and performance based” premarket review pathway for manufacturers of “certain, well-understood device types” to demonstrate substantial equivalence under the 510(k) clearance pathway, by demonstrating that such device meets objective safety and performance criteria established by the FDA, obviating the need for manufacturers to compare the safety and performance of their medical devices to specific predicate devices in the clearance process.  The FDA intends to maintain a list of device types appropriate for the “safety and performance-based pathway” and develop product-specific guidance documents that identify the performance criteria for each such device type, as well as the testing methods recommended in the guidance, where feasible.  The FDA may establish performance criteria for classes of devices for which we or our competitors seek or currently have received clearance.  It is unclear the extent to which such performance standards, if established, could impact our ability to obtain new 510(k) clearances or otherwise create competition that may negatively affect our business.

These reforms could delay or prevent us from obtaining or maintaining 510(k) clearances or other premarket authorizations for our existing or new devices.  Compliance with the new rules could require us to undertake significant additional costs prior to and following commercialization of our products, which may reduce the profitability of those products.

In addition, FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products.  Any new statutes, regulations or revisions or reinterpretations of existing regulations may impose additional costs or lengthen review times of any future products or make it more difficult to obtain clearance or approval for, manufacture, market or distribute our products.  We cannot determine what effect changes in regulations, statutes, legal interpretation or policies, when and if promulgated, enacted or adopted may have on our business in the future. Such changes could, among other things, require: additional testing prior to obtaining clearance or approval; changes to manufacturing methods; recall, replacement or discontinuance of our products; or additional record keeping.

- 12 -


Health care policy changes and industry cost-containment measures could result in downward pricing pressure for our products and limit our sales.


Most of our customers, and those to whom our customers supply medical devices, rely on third-party payers, including government programs and private health insurance plans, to reimburse some or all of the cost of the medical devices we manufacture.  The continuing efforts of governmental authorities, insurance companies and other payers of health care costs to contain or reduce these costs and, more generally, to reform the health care system, could limit the prices we are able to charge for our products or the amounts of reimbursement available for our products or the drugs that they administer, which would put pressure on us to reduce our prices for our products and/or limit our sales.  The adoption of some or all of these proposals could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.


Our business depends on an adequate supply of drugs to be administered by our products.


Demand for our products depends on the availability of drugs to be administered by them.  Currently, most of our products require immunoglobulin therapies that rely on blood plasma collection for drugs such as Hizentra® and Cuvitru®. Any disruption in the supply of these drugs for any reason, including contamination, could significantly adversely affect our business.  The change of any drug indication by the FDA or comparable foreign governmental agencies could also result in decreased demand for our products. In addition, pharmaceutical companies and other competitors have or are developing alternative therapies for disease states that are deliverable without a medical device. If there is not an adequate supply of drugs requiring administration by medical devices such as those provided by us or alternative therapies are developed, our sales may suffer and/or our products may become obsolete.


Issues with product quality could have an adverse effect upon our business, subject us to regulatory actions, cause a loss of customer confidence in us or our products, among other negative consequences.


Quality management plays an essential role in determining and meeting customer requirements, preventing defects, improving our products and services, and assuring the safety and efficacy of our products.  Our future success depends on our ability to maintain and continuously improve our quality management program.  While we have a quality system that covers the lifecycle of our products, quality and safety issues may occur with respect to any of our products.  A quality or safety issue may result in adverse inspection reports, voluntary or official action indicated, warning letters, import bans, product recalls (either voluntary or required by the FDA or

similar governmental authorities in other countries) or seizures, monetary sanctions, injunctions to halt manufacture and distribution of products, civil or criminal sanctions, costly litigation, refusal of a government to grant approvals and licenses, restrictions on operations or withdrawal of existing approvals and licenses.  An inability to address a quality or safety issue in an effective and timely manner may also cause negative publicity, a loss of customer confidence in us or our current or future products, which may result in the loss of sales and difficulty in successfully launching new products.


Defects or quality issues associated with our products could adversely affect the results of our operations.


The design, manufacture and marketing of medical devices involve certain inherent risks.  Manufacturing or design defects, component failures, unapproved or improper use of our products, or inadequate disclosure of risks or other information relating to the use of our products can lead to injury or other serious adverse events.  We are subject to the FDA’s medical device reporting regulations and similar foreign regulations, which require us to report to the FDA when we receive or become aware of information that reasonably suggests that one or more of our products may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that, if the malfunction were to recur, it could cause or contribute to a death or serious injury.  The timing of our obligation to report is triggered by the date we become aware of the adverse event as well as the nature of the event.  If we fail to comply with our reporting obligations, the FDA could take action, including warning letters, untitled letters, administrative actions, criminal prosecution, imposition of civil monetary penalties, revocation of our device clearances or approvals, seizure of our products, or delay in clearance or approval of future products.

These adverse events could also lead to recalls or safety alerts relating to our products or recalls (either voluntary or as required by the FDA or similar governmental authorities in other countries), and could result, in certain cases, in the removal of a product from the market.  A recall could result in significant costs and lost sales and customers, enforcement actions and/or investigations by state and federal governments or other enforcement bodies, as well as negative publicity and damage to our reputation that could reduce future demand for our products.  Any corrective action, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well as defending ourselves in a lawsuit, will require the dedication of our time and capital, distract management from operating our business and may harm our reputation and financial results.

Personal injuries relating to the use of our products can also result in significant product liability claims being brought against us.  A product liability claim, regardless of its merit or outcome, could not only result in significant legal defense costs, but also have a material adverse effect on our business and reputation and ability to attract and retain customers for our products.  In some circumstances, adverse events could also cause delays in regulatory approval of new products or the imposition of post-market approval requirements.


- 913 -



Interruption of our manufacturing operations could adversely affect our future revenues and operating income.


There is a strict regulatory regime governing our manufacturing operations, which includes product assembly, calibration, pre- and post-assembly quality control inspection and testing, and final packaging for all of our products at our Chester, NY facility.  Variations in the manufacturing process may result in production failures which could lead to launch delays, product shortage, unanticipated costs, lost revenues and damage to our reputation. A failure to identify and address manufacturing problems prior to the release of products to our customers may also result in a quality or safety issue that could result in a recall or other inability to sell our products.


Our products are manufactured and stored at a single manufacturing facility in Chester, NY. Loss or damage to our manufacturing and storage site due to weather, vandalism, terrorism, a natural disaster, issues in our manufacturing process, equipment failure or other factors, could adversely affect our ability to manufacture sufficient quantities of products or otherwise deliver products to meet customer demand or contractual requirements which may result in a loss of revenue and other adverse business consequences, including damage to our relationship with customers. Because of the time required to approve and license a manufacturing facility, a third party manufacturer may not be available on a timely basis (if at all) to replace production capacity in the event we lose manufacturing capacity or products are otherwise unavailable due to natural disaster, regulatory action or otherwise.


We take precautions to safeguard our facility and storage site, including acquiring insurance, adopting health and safety protocols and utilizing off-site storage of computer data. Our insurance may not cover our losses in any particular case. In addition, regardless of the level of insurance coverage, damage to our facilities may harm our business, financial condition and operating results.


We may need to substantially change our manufacturing operations in order to expand.


We currently have six options to extend our current lease of our manufacturing facility, which is also our headquarters, through August 2022.  Although we believe our current space is sufficient to significantly increase current production requirements, we are considering various alternatives to expand our manufacturing operations and carry out our business plan.  There is no guaranty that any of these alternatives will be realized on favorable terms, or at all.  If we do find an appropriate alternative, we may need to expend significant resources to ensure continued regulatory compliance.  Changes to our corporate headquarters and/or manufacturing operations could cause us to incur significant expenses and could delay or reduce our ability to manufacture our products for some time. Our financial condition and results of operation could be materially adversely affected by any such change.


We are subject to lawsuits.


We are currently party to several lawsuits with a competitor.  In the future wehave been and may be party to lawsuits, settlement discussions, mediations, arbitrations and other disputes, including patent and product liability claims, whether brought by companies, individuals or governmental authorities.  These current and future matters may result in a loss of patent protection, reduced revenue, incurrence of significant liabilities and diversion of our management’s time, attention and resources. Our insurance coverage may not provide adequate protection against actual losses.  In addition, we are subject to the risk that one or more of our insurers may become insolvent and become unable to pay claims that may be made in the future.  Even if we maintain adequate insurance, claims could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations and on our ability to obtain suitable, adequate or cost-effective insurance in the future.  Litigation and other disputes, including any adverse outcomes, may have an adverse impact on our business, operations or financial condition.  Even claims without merit could subject us to adverse publicity and require us to incur significant legal fees.


The outcome of pending EMED legal proceedings could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.


We are involved in several lawsuits with our competitor, EMED Technologies Corporation (“EMED”), wherein EMED has alleged our needle sets infringe various patents controlled by EMED.  Certain of these lawsuits also allege antitrust violations, unfair business practices and various other claims.  Although we believe we will prevail on the merits, an adverse outcome in this matter could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. See “LEGAL PROCEEDINGS” for a further description of this litigation.


If we are unable to protect our patents or other proprietary rights, or if we infringe the patents or other proprietary rights of others, our competitiveness and business prospects may be materially damaged.


Patent and other proprietary rights are essential to our business.  We own patents, trade secrets, trademarks and/or other intellectual property rights related to many of our products.  Our success depends to a significant degree on our ability to obtain and enforce patents, both in the U.S. and in other countries.  We can lose the protection afforded by these intellectual property assets through patent expirations, legal challenges or governmental action.  Additionally, our intellectual property rights may be challenged or infringed


- 10 -



upon by third parties, particularly in countries where property rights are not highly developed or protected, or we may be unable to enter into license agreements with third-party owners of intellectual property on reasonable terms.  Unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights or inability to preserve existing intellectual property rights could adversely impact our competitive position and results of operations.


The patent position of a medical device company is often uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions.  Significant litigation concerning patents and products is pervasive in our industry.  Patent claims include challenges to the coverage and validity of our patents on products or processes as well as allegations that our products infringe patents held by competitors or other third parties.  A loss in any of these types of cases could result in a loss of patent protection or the ability to market products, which could lead to a significant loss of sales, or otherwise materially affect future results of operations.  We also rely on trademarks, trade secrets and know-how to develop, maintain and strengthen our competitive positions.  Third parties may know, discover or independently develop equivalent proprietary information or techniques, or they may gain access to our trade secrets or disclose our trade secrets to the public.


Although our employees, consultants, parties to collaboration agreements and other business partners are generally subject to confidentiality or similar agreements to protect our confidential and proprietary information, these agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies in the event of a breach of confidence.  To the extent that our employees, consultants, parties to collaboration agreements and other business partners use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.


Furthermore, our intellectual property, other proprietary technology and other sensitive company data is potentially vulnerable to loss, damage or misappropriation from system malfunction, computer viruses, unauthorized access to our data or misappropriation or misuse thereof by those with permitted access and other events.  While we have invested to protect our intellectual property, confidential information and other data, and continue to work diligently in this area, there can be no assurance that our precautionary measures will prevent breakdowns, breaches, cyber incidents or other events. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations.


Misappropriation or other loss of our intellectual property from any of the foregoing would have an adverse effect on our competitive position and may cause us to incur substantial litigation costs.


We need to attract and retain key employees to be competitive.


Our ability to compete effectively depends upon our ability to attract and retain executives and other key employees, including people in technical, marketing, sales, research and development, quality assurance and regulatory compliance positions.  We depend on key management personnel and attracting and retaining other qualified personnel, and our business could be harmed if we lose key management personnel or cannot attract and retain other qualified personnel.  We do not maintain any “key man” insurance policies on the lives of any of our employees.


- 14 -


In addition, if we expect to grow our operations, it will be necessary for us to attract and retain additional qualified personnel.  In particular, we will need to find experienced key employees to lead our research and development and quality assurance and regulatory complianceoperations functions.  The failure to attract, integrate, motivate, and retain additional skilled and qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business.  We compete for such personnel against numerous companies, including larger, more established companies with significantly greater financial resources than we possess.  Our ability to recruit such talent will depend on a number of factors, including compensation and benefits, work location and work environment.  There can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting or retaining such personnel and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


We sell a majority of our products through only a few distributors.distributors on whom we depend, and our financial results depend on their purchasing patterns.


Most of our customers prefer to purchase our products through distributors, rather than directly from us, because of “one-stop shopping” convenience and their ability to ship directly to patients.  We sell most of our products through a small number of distributors, two in the U.S. and two outside the U.S.  As of December 31, 2019,2021, these four distributors comprised approximately 67%62% of our net revenues.revenues with one U.S. distributor contributing 41%.  Purchasing patterns by these distributors cannot always be predicted and fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year based on, among other things, their expectations of customer demand.  Any decline in business with the distributors outside the U.S. could have an adverse impact on our business.  If we were unable to sell through the distributors outside the U.S., we would have to find other distributors or broaden our customer base and expand direct relationships with customers.  Other distributors may not be available or may not agree to arrangements that are commercially reasonable.  In the U.S. we could transition to direct customer purchase; however, customers may not want to purchase directly from us and may decide to purchase competitors’ products through their distributors.  Moreover, a transition from distributors to direct customer purchase would be time consuming and costly.


We and our customers are subject to extensive regulation by governments around the world, and if these regulations are not complied with, existing and future operations may be curtailed, and we could be subject to liability.

Our devices and our customers’ drug-device combination products, and/or compatible products, that may utilize our device are subject to extensive regulation by governmental authorities in the United States, Europe and other countries, including the FDA.  Not only do these regulations present challenges during the regulatory approval process, but after our devices or our customers’ drug-device combination products, and/or compatible products, that may utilize our device are approved for new indications and placed in the market, numerous regulatory requirements will apply.  These include, but are not limited to QSR, labeling regulations and FDA prohibitions against the promotion of products for uncleared, unapproved or “off label” uses, medical device reporting regulations and post-market surveillance regulations, and laws and regulations that govern the development, testing, manufacturing, advertising, marketing and distribution of medical devices, including our devices and our customers’ drug-device combination products, and/or compatible products, that may utilize our device.  The FDA has broad post-market and regulatory enforcement powers.

In the European Union (“EU”), we are required to comply with the new Medical Device Regulation (“MDR” or “EU MDR”) effective May 2021, which will supersedes the prior Medical Device Directives.  Medical devices which have a valid CE certificate to the current Medical Device Directives (issued before May 2021) can continue to be sold until May 2024 or until the CE certificate expires, whichever comes first, providing there are no significant changes as defined in Article 120 of EU MDR.  The MDR was published in May 2017 with a 3-year transition period.  That transition period was extended to May 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.  The CE mark required to sell medical devices in the EU is affixed following conformity assessment and either approval from an appointed independent notified body or through self-certification by the manufacturer.  The selected pathway to CE marking is based on product risk classification.  CE marking indicates conformity to the applicable essential requirements of the relevant Medical Device Directives and in the future to the general safety and performance requirements for the new MDR.  The MDR will change multiple aspects of the existing regulatory framework for CE marking, such as increased clinical evidence requirements and other new requirements, including Unique Device Identification (“UDI”) as well as many other post-market obligations.  MDR also significantly modifies and increases the compliance requirements for the industry and will require significant investment in the near future to implement.

If our devices are commercialized as part of a drug-delivery combination product we, as the manufacturer of the device component of that combination product, we are subject to unannounced and preapproval inspections by the FDA of our manufacturing facility to determine our compliance with QSR and cGMP.

Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in an enforcement action by the FDA or other regulatory authority, which may include any or all of the following sanctions: fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties, recall or seizure of our products or our customers’ drug-device combination products, operating restrictions, partial suspensions or total shutdown of production, refusing our customers’ requests for regulatory approvals of their drug-device combination products or new intended uses, as applicable, refusing our requests for regulatory approval of our devices, withdrawing our customers’ or our regulatory approvals that may be granted and criminal prosecution.

- 1115 -



The therapeutic efficacy of certain of our customers’ drug-device combination products, and/or compatible products, that may utilize our device are either unproven in humans or has only been proven in limited circumstances, and we may not be able to successfully develop and sell our products in combination with our customers’ drug-or-drug-device combination products.

While some of our customers use our products with established, approved drugs, in certain instances, the benefits of those drugs as injectable therapies are either unproven or have only been proven in limited circumstances.  Our ability to generate revenue from our products will depend heavily on the successful development, commercialization and sales of our customers’ drug products or drug-device combination products, which is subject to many potential risks.  For example, data developed in clinical trials or following the commercialization of our customers’ drugs or drug-device combination products may show that such therapies do not prove to be effective treatments for the targets they are being designed to act against (or as effective as other treatments available). In clinical trials or following commercialization, it may be shown that those drugs interact with human biological systems in unforeseen, ineffective or harmful ways.  If those drugs are associated with undesirable side effects or have characteristics that are unexpected, the pharmaceutical companies that make those drugs may need to abandon clinical development or discontinue commercial sales or limit clinical development or sales to certain uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective.  As a result of these and other risks described herein that are inherent in the development and sale of therapeutic agents, pharmaceutical companies may never successfully develop or successfully commercialize their drugs, or the commercialization of their drugs may be abandoned or severely limited, which may limit our profitability with respect to customers with drugs or drug-device combination products including those drugs and our device, and we may not be successful in achieving commercial scale production and sales of our injectable drug delivery systems in combination with certain drugs.

Certain of the injectable therapies being targeted for use with our products are not approved but are in various phases of clinical development. These injectable therapies may be independently terminated by their makers prior to submission of a regulatory filing or even after regulatory approval, resulting in the cessation of any revenue associated with that contract or program.

We work with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies who are targeting the use of our products with a variety of injectable therapies.  Certain of those injectable therapies are not FDA approved and are in various phases of clinical development.  The clinical development of these pipeline therapies can be terminated by their developers at any stage.  Furthermore, these pharmaceutical companies could obtain regulatory approval for their injectable therapies and decide for business reasons not to require or encourage utilization of our device.  Prior investments we have made in manufacturing capacity or research and development will then not result in the generation of revenue that would have previously been anticipated.

Our commercial success depends upon the attainment of significant market acceptance of drug product candidates to be included in our customers’ drug-device combination and/or compatible products, that may utilize our device, if approved, among physicians, patients, healthcare payers or the medical community.

Even if pharmaceutical companies obtain regulatory approval for their drug product candidates, their product candidates may not gain sufficient levels of market acceptance among physicians, healthcare payers, patients or the medical community to make them commercially feasible. Market acceptance of our customers’ product candidates, if they receive approval, depends on a number of factors, including the:

efficacy and safety of the product candidates;
clinical indications for which the product candidates are approved;
acceptance by physicians, patients and the medical community of the product candidates as a safe and effective treatment;
potential and perceived advantages of the product candidates over alternative treatments;
safety of the product candidates seen in a broader patient group;
prevalence and severity of any side effects;
product labeling or product insert requirements of the FDA or other regulatory authorities;
timing of market introduction of the product candidates as well as competitive products;
cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments;
availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement and pricing by third party payers and government authorities;
relative convenience and ease of administration; and
effectiveness of the pharmaceutical companies’ sales and marketing efforts.

If pharmaceutical companies’ candidates are approved but fail to achieve market acceptance among physicians, patients or healthcare payers, we may not be able to generate anticipated revenue.  This may limit our ability to generate anticipated revenue from our prior investments.  Moreover, even if we achieve commercial scale production and sales of our injectable drug delivery systems in combination with certain injectable therapies, the makers of such therapies may face indirect competition from companies who develop and market other brand name, biosimilar or generic injectable therapies as well as alternative treatments and delivery methods that compete with our customers’ drug-device combination products, and/or compatible products, that may utilize our device, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, our financial condition and/or cash flows.

- 16 -


Most brand name injectable therapies will face future competition from generic or biosimilar therapies, which could significantly reduce their commercial viability.

Brand name injectable therapies will usually become exposed to competition from generic or biosimilar rivals at some time after their regulatory approval and commercial launch.  The average selling price and market share of brand name injectable therapies can be significantly diminished following the introduction of generic or biosimilar competition.  These factors may result in our customers using our products with their brand name injectable therapies seeking to withdraw such injectable therapy from the market or change market tactics in a way that makes the use of our products cost prohibitive.  This may result in reduction of revenues due to lower demand, termination of supply contracts, and other factors.

All of our components and raw materials are sourced from single suppliers. If we are unable to obtain sufficient components or raw materials on a timely basis or for a cost-effective price, or if we experience other supply difficulties, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.


Our ability to meet customer demand depends, in part, on our ability to obtain timely and adequate delivery of raw materials and components for our products.  All of the materials and components that go into the manufacturing of our products are sourcedsingle-sourced from third-party suppliers.


The price and supply of materials and components for our products may be impacted or disrupted for reasons beyond our control. While we work with suppliers to ensure continuity of supply, no assurance can be given that these efforts will be successful.  Although we do carry strategic inventory and maintain insurance to help mitigate the potential risk related to any supply disruption, there can be no assurance that such measures will be sufficient or effective.  The termination, reduction or interruption in supply of raw materials and components and an inability to quickly develop acceptable alternative sources for such supply, could adversely impact our ability to manufacture and sell certain of our products in a timely or cost-effective manner.


Some of the components for our products are provided by a single supplier, including our Taiwan-based supplier of molded plastic parts and our U.S.-based supplier of tubing.  We also rely on a single supplier to provide subassemblies for our products.  We do not have long-term agreements in place with these suppliers, although we are in the process of negotiating such agreements with certainany of our suppliers. We are alsosuppliers, with the exception of a long-term agreement with our needle set subassembly supplier which we entered in the process of seeking alternative sources of supply for our products.2020. Due to regulatory requirements relating to the qualification of suppliers, however, we mayare not likely to be able to establish additional or replacement sources on a timely basis or without excessive cost.  We are in the process of establishing alternative sources of supply for our raw materials and components, but there can be no assurance we will be able to do so.


Additionally, Command manufactures and supplies the Company’s subassemblies, needle sets and tubing products in Nicaragua. There could be a delay in providing the products timely due to their climate and international boundaries.

Additionally, volatility in our cost of energy, raw materials, components, subassemblies, transportation/freight, and manufacturing and distribution could adversely affect our results of operations.  Climate change (including laws or regulations passed in response to it) could increase our costs, in particular our costs of supply, energy and transportation/freight.  Material or sustained increases in the price of oil and natural gas could have an adverse impact on the cost of many of the plastic materials we use to make and package our products, as well as our transportation/freight costs.  These outcomes may in turn result in customers transitioning to available competitive products, loss of market share, negative publicity, reputational damage, loss of customer confidence or other negative consequences (including a decline in stock price).


Our failure to comply with laws and regulations relating to reimbursement of health care products may subject us to penalties and adversely impact our reputation, business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.


Our devices are purchased principally by specialty pharmacies and ambulatory service providers or hospitals that typically bill various third-party payers, such as governmental programs (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid and comparable non-U.S. programs), private insurance plans and managed care plans, for the healthcare services provided to their patients.  The ability of those customers to obtain appropriate reimbursement from third-party payers for our products and the drugs they administer is critical because it affects which products customers purchase and the prices they are willing to pay.  As a result, our devices are subject to regulation regarding quality and cost by U.S. governmental agencies, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), as well as comparable state and non-U.S. agencies responsible for reimbursement and regulation of health care goods and services, including laws and regulations related to kickbacks, false claims, self-referrals and health care fraud.  Many states have similar laws that apply to reimbursement by state Medicaid and other funded programs, and in some cases to all payers.  In certain circumstances, insurance companies can attempt to bring a private cause of action against a manufacturer for causing a false claim to be filed under the Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. In addition, as a manufacturer of FDA-approved devices reimbursable by federal healthcare programs, we are subject to the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires us to annually report certain payments and other transfers of value we make to U.S.-licensed physicians or U.S. teaching hospitals.  Any failure to comply with these laws

and regulations could subject us or our officers and employees to criminal and civil financial penalties.  Similar reporting requirements applicable to medical device manufacturers have also been implemented by some states. Failure to comply with these state requirements could result in civil monetary penalties being assessed against us.


- 17 -


These laws and regulations, among other things, constrain our business, marketing and other promotional activities by limiting the kinds of financial arrangements, including sales programs, we may have with hospitals, physicians or other potential purchasers of our products. Due to the breadth of these laws, the narrowness of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors available, and the range of interpretations to which they are subject, it is possible that some of our current or future practices might be challenged under one or more of these laws.

To enforce compliance with the healthcare regulatory laws, certain enforcement bodies have recently increased their scrutiny of interactions between healthcare companies and healthcare providers, which has led to a number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions and settlements in the healthcare industry. Responding to investigations can be time-and resource-consuming and can divert management’s attention from the business. Additionally, as a result of these investigations, healthcare providers and entities may have to agree to additional compliance and reporting requirements as part of a consent decree or corporate integrity agreement. Any such investigation or settlement could increase our costs or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business.  Even an unsuccessful challenge or investigation into our practices could cause adverse publicity and be costly to respond to.  If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the healthcare laws or regulations described above or any other healthcare regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including administrative, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, imprisonment, contractual damages, reputational harm, disgorgement and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations.  In addition, we are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-corruption laws outside the U.S. Actual or alleged violation of these laws by our employees, consultants, sales agents or distributors could subject us to investigations by the U.S. or foreign governments, significant criminal or civil sanctions and other liabilities, and damage our reputation.

We may need additional funding in the future, and if we are unable to raise capital when needed, we may be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development, commercial efforts, or sales efforts.


Producing and marketing our developed products is costly.  Although we believe we currently have adequate capital to fulfill our near-term funding needs, we may need to raise substantial additional capital in the future in order to execute our business plan and help us fund the development and commercialization of new products.  We raised approximately $26.6 million from the equity offering in 2020.


- 12 -



We may finance future cash needs through public or private equity offerings and may also use debt financings or strategic collaboration and licensing arrangements.  We may seek to access the public or private equity markets whenever conditions are favorable, even if we do not have an immediate need for additional capital.  To the extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our shareholders may experience additional dilution; any debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants and could result in high interest expense.  If we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements, it may require us to relinquish certain enumerated rights to our product candidates, processes, technologies, or development projects, or to enter into licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.  We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all.  If adequate funds are not available from the foregoing sources, we may consider additional strategic financing options, or we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate our research or development and/or some of our commercialization efforts.


We may experience difficulties resulting from our newevolving management structure and executive team and members of the Board of Directors.team.


Since July 2018, the compositionWe have made a number of changes to our executive team and Board of Directors has changed substantially.  In addition, we have implemented a new management structure throughout the organization since July 2018 and have recently filled a number of these positions while we are actively recruiting to fill others.  Although, we believe the persons who currently and will serve in these positions are and will be qualified to do so, they may take time to integrate into the organization and with each other, if at all.  Many of these persons have or will have had little to no experience with our company prior to joining us, which may result in delays in our ability to implement our business plans.  If we are unable to integrate, motivate and retain the services of our new executives and other managers, and our directors, or if integration takes longer than we expect, it may have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.


Changes in tax or labor laws or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could increase our costs and reduce our margins.


Changes to the tax and labor laws in the U.S. or other countries in which we operate could have an adverse effect on our operating results.  In particular,  the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Reform”), including, among other things, certainCertain changes in tax rates, deductibility of interest, deductibility of executive compensation expense, expensing of capital expenditures, the ability to use certain tax credits, taxation on earnings from international business operations, and the system of taxation (from worldwide to territorial) could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.  In certain instances, Tax Reform could have a negative effect on our tax rate and the carrying value of deferred tax balances.  Taxing authorities may audit us from time to time and disagree with certain positions we have taken in respect of our tax liabilities.  We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision.  However, we may not accurately predict the outcome of these audits, and as a result the actual outcome of these audits may have an adverse impact on our financial results.


- 18 -


Prior to the U.S. presidential election, President Biden proposed an increase in the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 21% to 28%, the creation of a 10% penalty on certain imports and a 15% minimum tax on worldwide book income.

Our manufacturing operations depend on low-cost labor.  Recent increases in U.S. minimum wage requirements, as well as those imposed by the state of New York and New Jersey will increase our costs for employees to support those operations, reduce our margins and negatively impact our profit.


A downturn in global economic conditions could adversely affect our operations.


Deterioration in the global economic environment, particularly in countries with government-sponsored healthcare systems, may cause decreased demand for our products and increased competition, which could result in lower sales volume and downward pressure on the prices for our products, longer sales cycles, and slower adoption of new technologies.  A weakening of economic conditions in the U.S. and/or abroad may also adversely affect our suppliers, which could result in interruptions in supply.


We are subject to foreign currency exchange risk.


A portion of our revenues is currently, and we expect in the future to be, derived from international operations.  Our revenues from sales outside the U.S. may be adversely affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.  We cannot predict with any certainty changes in foreign currency exchange rates or our ability to mitigate these risks.  We may experience additional volatility as a result of inflationary pressures and other macroeconomic factors.  If we cannot adequately mitigate foreign currency exchange rates, our revenues and profit may suffer.


- 13 -



Our distribution network and other operations outside the U.S. subject us to certain risks.


Approximately 16%17% of our net salesrevenues in the year ended December 31, 20192021, came from our operations outside the U.S., and we intend to continue to pursue growth opportunities in foreign markets.  Our foreign operations subject us to certain risks, including, among others, the effects of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange, uncertainties with respect to local economic and political conditions, competition from local companies, trade protectionism and restrictions on the transfer of goods across borders, U.S. diplomatic and trade relations with the governments of the foreign countries in which we operate, foreign regulatory requirements or changes in such requirements, local product preferences and product requirements, longer payment terms for accounts receivable than we experience in the U.S., difficulty in establishing, staffing and managing foreign operations, changes to international trade agreements and treaties, changes in tax laws, weakening or loss of the protection of intellectual property rights in some countries, and import or export licensing requirements.


In addition, we are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-corruption laws outside the U.S. Actual or alleged violation of these laws by our employees, consultants, sales agents or distributors could subject us to investigations by the U.S. or foreign governments, significant criminal or civil sanctions and other liabilities, and damage our reputation.


Brexit may impact our business in the United Kingdom.


One of our two most significant international distributors is located in the United Kingdom (“UK”), and the other is in Finland, a member of the European Union (“EU”).  The June 2016 referendum result in the UK to exit the EU (commonly known as “Brexit”), and the subsequent commencement of the official withdrawal process by the UK government in March 2017, has created uncertainties affecting business operations in the UK and the EU.  Until the terms of the transition period following the UK’s exit from the EU onOn January 31, 2020, are determined, it is difficult to predict its impact. It is possible thatthe UK withdrew from the EU. Under the withdrawal could, among other things, affect the legal and regulatory environments to which our business and the businesses of our distributors are subject, impact tradeagreement agreed between the UK and the EU, the UK was subject to a transition period until December 31, 2020 (the “Transition Period”) during which EU rules continued to apply.  During the Transition Period, negotiations between the UK and other parties,the EU continued in relation to the future customs and create economictrading relationship between the UK and political uncertaintythe EU following the expiration of the Transition Period. Due to the current COVID-19 global pandemic, negotiations between the UK and the EU scheduled have either been postponed or occurred in a reduced forum via video conference.  However, on December 24, 2020, the region.negotiators from the EU and UK reached an agreement on a new partnership.  This agreement sets out the rules that apply between the EU and the UK as of January 1, 2021.   New regulations require medical device registration with the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA") before being placed on the Great Britain market (England, Wales, and Scotland). Additionally, all medical devices will require a UK Conformity Assessed mark (“UKCA”) by July 1, 2023. CE marks issued by Notified Bodies will remain valid until this time. Therefore, we must be compliant with applicable legislation in order to identify our devices with the UKCA mark and continue to market and sell our devices in Great Britain beyond July 1, 2023.


We are dependent on information technology systems and subject to privacy and security laws, and our systems and infrastructure face certain risks, including from cyber security breaches and data leakage.


Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems, and those of third parties on which we rely, are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, malware, natural disasters, terrorism, war, telecommunication and electrical failures, cyber-attacks or cyber-intrusions over the Internet, attachments to emails, persons inside our organization, or persons with access to systems inside our organization.  While we do not believe that we have experienced any such system failure, accident, or security breach to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our systems, it could result in a material disruption of our operations.  To the extent that any disruption or security breach results in a loss of or damage to our data or applications or other data

- 19 -


or applications relating to our technology, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liabilities, damage to our reputation, and the further development of our product candidates could be delayed.  Additionally, such disruptions and security breaches, when there is a risk of patient harm, may require devices changes to fix vulnerabilities and strengthen cybersecurity.  Such changes could, in some cases, require reporting to and approval by the FDA prior to implementation, which could cause a delay in the continued marketing of the underlying product that will result in a loss of revenues to us. Furthermore, failure to adhere to good cybersecurity practices with regards to medical devices could result in enforcement action by the FDA including warning letters or other forms of enforcement.


We cannot guarantee that any of our strategic acquisitions, investments or alliances will be successful.


We may seek to supplement our internal growth through strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances.  Such transactions are inherently risky, and the integration of any newly-acquirednewly acquired business requires significant effort and management attention.  The success of any acquisition, investment or alliance may be affected by a number of factors, including our ability to properly assess and value the potential business opportunity or to successfully integrate any business we may acquire into our existing business.  There can be no assurance that any past or future transaction will be successful.


Our operating results and financial condition may fluctuate.


Our operating results and financial condition may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year for a number of reasons.  Events such as a delay in product development, increases in litigation expenses, changes to our expectations or strategy or even a relatively small revenue shortfall may cause financial results for a period to be below our expectations or projections.  As a result, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance.  Our operating results and financial condition are also subject to fluctuation from all of the risks described throughout this section.  These fluctuations may adversely affect our results of operations and financial conditions and our stock price.


- 14 -



Future material impairments in the value of our long-lived assets could negatively affect our operating results.


We review our long-lived assets, including identifiable intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, for impairment.  Long-lived assets are reviewed when there is an indication or triggering event that impairment may have occurred.  Changes in market conditions or other changes in the future outlook of value may lead to impairment charges in the future.  In addition, we may from time to time sell assets that we determine are not critical to our strategy.  Future events or decisions may lead to asset impairments and/or related charges. Certain non-cash impairments may result from a change in our strategic goals, business direction or other factors relating to the overall business environment.  Material impairment charges could negatively affect our results of operations.


Actions of activist stockholders could have an adverse effect on our business.


From time to time, we may be subject to proposals by stockholders urging us to take certain corporate actions.  If activist stockholder activities ensue, our business could be adversely affected because responding to proxy contests and reacting to other actions by activist stockholders can be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our operations and divert the attention of management and our employees. For example, we may be required to retain the services of various professionals to advise us on activist stockholder matters, including legal, financial and communications advisors, the costs of which may negatively impact our future financial results.  In addition, perceived uncertainties as to our future direction, strategy or leadership created as a consequence of activist stockholder initiatives may result in the loss of potential business opportunities, harm our ability to attract new investors, customers, employees, and joint venture partners, and cause our stock price to experience periods of volatility or stagnation.


Natural disasters, war and other events could adversely affect our suppliers and customers.


Natural disasters (including pandemics), war, terrorism, labor disruptions and international conflicts, and actions taken by the U.S. and other governments or by our customers or suppliers in response to such events, could cause significant economic disruption and political and social instability in the U.S. and areas outside of the U.S. in which we operate.  CertainMost of the subassemblies used in our products are manufacturedassembled and packaged in Nicaragua, where there is currently civil unrest whose outcome cannot be predicted.  This and similar events could increase the costs for or cause interruptions in the supply of materials, result in decreased demand for our products or adversely affect our manufacturing and distribution capabilities.


Our insurance coverage may be inadequate to cover all the liabilities we may incur.


We face the risk of exposure to liability claims if any product that we develop causes injury.  Although we carry insurance at levels customary for companies in our industry, such coverage may become unavailable or be inadequate to cover all liabilities we may incur.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to maintain such insurance, or obtain comparable insurance at a reasonable cost, if at all.  If we are unable to obtain sufficient insurance coverage at an acceptable cost or otherwise, or if the amount of any claim against us exceeds the coverage under our policies, we may face significant expenses.


- 20 -


Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock


There may be circumstances in which the interests of our significant stockholders could be in conflict with your interests as a stockholder.


Two stockholders, together with their respective affiliates, beneficially own approximately 31%24% and 18%,13% of our outstanding common stock, respectively.  An affiliate of Horton Freedom, L.P. currently serves on our Board of Directors.  Circumstances may arise in which these stockholders may have an interest in exerting influence to pursue or prevent acquisitions, divestitures or other transactions, including the issuance of additional shares or debt, that, in their judgment, could enhance their investment in us or another company in which they invest.  Such transactions might adversely affect us or other holders of our common stock. Furthermore, our significant concentration of share ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock because investors may perceive disadvantages in owning shares in companies with significant stockholders.


We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock.


We have never paid dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to pay any dividends to holders of our common stock for the foreseeable future.  We currently intend to invest our future earnings, if any, to fund our growth.  Therefore, you are not likely to receive any dividends on your common stock for the foreseeable future.


- 15 -



Future sales and issuances of shares of our common stock or rights to purchase our common stock, including pursuant to our stock option plan,equity compensation plans, could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders.


We may need additional capital in the future to continue our planned operations.  To the extent we raise additional capital by issuing equity and/or convertible securities, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution.  We may sell our common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner, we determine from time to time. If we sell our common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities, investors may be materially diluted.  These sales may also result in material dilution to our existing stockholders, and new investors could gain rights superior to our existing stockholders.


We provide and intend to continue to provide additional equity-based compensation to our employees, officers, directors consultants and independent contractors throughconsultants.  We have two equity compensation plans, under which a stock option plan. Under our stock option plan, 6,000,000total of 7,000,000 shares of our common stock have been reserved for issuance to our employees, including officers, consultants and directors, which number may be increased with the approval of our stockholders. We may issue equity-based compensation outside of our equity compensation plans as inducement for new employees.  If our Board elects to issue additional stock options under the plan,or other equity-based compensation, our stockholders may experience additional dilution, which could cause our stock price to decline.  Because stock options granted under the planour equity compensation plans will generally only be exercised when the exercise price for such option is below the then market value of the common stock, the exercise of such options or the issuance of shares will cause dilution to the book value per share of our common stock and to existing and new investors.


There has been volatility in the price of shares of our common stock.


Since our common stock was listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market on October 17, 2019, it has traded between $3.83$2.30 per share to $6.62$12.84 per share.  Our stock price is subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors, including:


quarterly variations in operating results;

announcements related to our ongoing litigation;

announcement of new products or customers by our competitors;

changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;

low trading volume on the Nasdaq Capital Market;

announcements related to litigation;

general economic conditions; or

other events or factors that are beyond our control.


In addition, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the trading prices of equity securities of many biotechnology companies.  These fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies.  Any negative change in the public’s perception of the prospects of medical device companies could further depress our stock price regardless of our results.  Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, particularly by our two most significant stockholders, or the perception that such sales might occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock and our stock price may decline substantially in a short time and our stockholders could suffer losses or be unable to liquidate their holdings.


- 21 -


If we do not maintain compliance with itsthe listing standards NASDAQof the Nasdaq Capital Market, Nasdaq may delist our Common Stockcommon stock from trading on its exchange.


The Nasdaq Capital Market on which our common stock trades has continued listing standards that we must maintain on an ongoing basis in order to continue the listing of our common stock.  If we fail to meet these continued listing requirements, our common stock may be subject to delisting.  If our common stock is delisted and we are not able to list our common stock on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities would be quoted on an over-the-counter market.  If this were to occur, our stockholders could face significant material adverse consequences, including limited availability of market quotations for our common stock and reduced liquidity for the trading of our common stock.  In addition, we could experience a decreased ability to issue additional securities and obtain additional financing in the future, if or when needed.


We may fail to meet our publicly announced Strategic Plan goals or other expectations about our business, which could cause our stock price to decline.


We have publicly announced certain financial goals through 2020 under our Strategic Plan.  Correctly identifying key factors affecting business conditions and predicting future events is inherently an uncertain process and we may not be able to meet our goals. Our goals are based on certain assumptions such as those relating to anticipated sales volumes and prices and cost reductions. If we are not able to meet our goals, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly.


- 16 -



We are a smaller reporting company and non-accelerated filer, and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to us will make our common stock less attractive to investors.


We are currently a “smaller reporting company” and a “non-accelerated filer”, as those terms are defined in the Securities Act.  Accordingly, we take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “smaller reporting companies” and “non-accelerated filers,” including, but not limited to, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requiring that independent registered public accounting firms provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.  Decreased disclosures in our SEC filings due to our status as a “smaller reporting company” and “non-accelerated filer” may make it harder for investors to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects.


We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive if we rely on these exemptions.  If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our share price may be more volatile.


Our significant shareholders, officers and directors can sell their stock, which may have a negative effect on our stock price and ability to raise additional capital, and may make it difficult for investors to sell their stock at any price.


A resale registration statement covering 17%10% and 8%7% of our outstanding common stock held by two stockholders, respectively, are freely tradeable in the market pursuant to a resale registration statement.  These stockholders purchased those shares at prices significantly lower than the price at which our common stock is currently trading.  In the event either of these significant stockholders choose to sell a substantial portion of their holdings, the price of our common stock may decline suddenly and sharply.  This may make it difficult or impossible for other investors to sell their stock at any price.


Our officers and directors beneficially own approximately 39%34% of our outstanding common stock as of February 27, 2020.December 31, 2021.  Each individual officer and director may be able to sell up to 1% of our outstanding common stock every ninety (90) days in the open market pursuant to Rule 144, which may have a negative effect on our stock price. In addition, if our officers and directors are selling their stock into the open market, it may make it difficult or impossible for investors to sell their stock at any price.


The price of our common stock may be adversely affected by the future issuance and sale of shares of our common stock or other equity securities.


We cannot predict the size of future issuances or sales of our common stock or other equity securities future acquisitions or capital raising activities, or the effect, if any, that such issuances or sales may have on the market price of our common stock. The issuance and sale of substantial amounts of common stock or other equity securities or announcement that such issuances and sales may occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Any decline in the price of our common stock may encourage short sales, which could place further downward pressure on the price of our common stock and may impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities.


You may find it difficult to sell our common stock.


Only recently has there been any active trading market in our common stock.  We cannot assure you that such an active trading market for our common stock will be sustained.  Regardless of whether an active and liquid public market exists, negative fluctuations in our actual or anticipated operating results will likely cause the market price of our common stock to fall, making it more difficult for you to sell our common stock at a favorable price, or at all.


- 22 -


If we fail to continue to meet the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”), our common stock may be delisted, which could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity of our common stock.


Our common stock is currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market.  Nasdaq has requirements that a company must meet in order to remain listed on Nasdaq.  In particular, Nasdaq rules require us to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share of our common stock. If the closing bid price of our common stock were to fall below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days or we do not meet other listing requirements, we would fail to be in compliance with Nasdaq listing standards. There can be no assurance that we will continue to meet the minimum bid price requirement,all of these requirements, or any other requirement in the future.  If we fail to meet the minimum bid price requirement, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC may initiate the delisting process. In addition, we may be unable to meet other applicable Nasdaq listing requirements, including maintaining minimum price, levels of stockholders’ equity or market values of our common stock, in which case, our common stock could be delisted.  If our common stock were to be delisted, the liquidity of our common stock would be adversely affected and the market price of our common stock could decrease.


- 17 -



ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS


Not applicable.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES


We currently rent a masonry and steel frame building erected on 3.27 acres of land located at 24 Carpenter Road, Chester, New York 10918.York. This facility is used as our headquarters and for our general operations.


On February 28, 2019, we completed year twenty We expect to move in June 2022 from this building into 43,975 square feet of a twenty year lease.  On November 14, 2017, we executed abuilding located at 100 Corporate Drive, Mahwah, New Jersey. The Company’s existing lease extension, which calls for six month extensions beginningexpires December 31, 2022, and the new lease commences March 1, 2019, with the option to renew six times.  The Company exercised three additional renewal options for September 1, 2019 through February 28, 2021.


We believe our current facilities are suitable2022 and adequate for our current business operations. We continue to seek another location with more square footage to provide us room for growth.  In addition to the increased costs of occupying a larger space, we expect to incur additional costs in connection with construction and FDA compliance with respect to the new location.expires August 31, 2032.


ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


We are involved in several lawsuits with our principal competitor, EMED Technologies Corporation (“EMED”).  EMED has alleged that our needle sets infringe various patents controlled by EMED.  Certain of these lawsuits also allege antitrust violations, unfair business practices, and various other business tort claims.  We are vigorously defending against all of the lawsuits brought by EMED. Although no assurances can be given, we believe we have meritorious defenses to all of EMED’s claims.None.


The initial case involving EMED was filed by us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on September 20, 2013 (the “California case”), in response to a letter from EMED claiming patent infringement by us, and seeking a declaratory judgment establishing the invalidity of the patent referenced in the letter – EMED’s US patent 8,500,703 – “‘703.”  EMED answered the complaint and asserted patent infringement of the ‘703 patent and several counterclaims relating generally to claims of unfair business practices against us. We responded by adding several claims against EMED, generally relating to claims of unfair business practices on EMED’s part.  Both parties have requested injunctive relief and monetary damages in unspecified amounts.  On June 16, 2015, the California court entered a preliminary injunction against KORU Medical for making certain statements regarding products cleared for use by the FDA, or that could be safely used, with KORU Medical’s Freedom60 pump, without voiding the product warranty.  On September 11, 2015, we requested an ex parte reexamination of the ‘703 patent by the US Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). The ex parte reexamination resulted in a Final Office Action, dated July 19, 2017, rejecting all of EMED’s claims in the issued patent.  On January 25, 2018, EMED filed an Appeal Brief with a Petition for Revival, which was accepted.  On April 9, 2018, the USPTO denied EMED’s request for reconsideration of the order rejecting all claims in the ‘703 patent.  On June 26, 2019, the Examiner responded to EMED’s appeal brief and maintained all of the final rejections.  On December 31, 2019, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the USPTO issued its decision sustaining the invalidity of claims 1-10 of the ‘703 patent, but reversing the Examiner’s rejection of claim 11, leaving claim 11 as the only surviving claim of the ‘703 patent.  Claim 11 of the ‘703 patent, however, was not asserted in the California case.  Both the California case and EMED’s appeal of the USPTO rejections are pending.  EMED’s deadline to take action in response to the PTAB decision has not yet expired.


The second court case was filed by EMED in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “Texas Court”) on June 25, 2015, claiming patent infringement on another of its patents (US 8,961,476 – “‘476”), by our needle sets, and seeking unspecified monetary damages (“ED Texas ‘476 matter”). This ‘476 patent is related to the now rejected EMED ‘703 patent.


On September 17, 2015, we requested an inter partes review (“IPR”) of the ‘476 patent, and in response to our request, the Court entered an order staying the ED Texas ‘476 matter until after the PTAB made a decision regarding the validity of the patent.  On January 12, 2017, the PTAB issued its Final Written Decision in our favor, invalidating all but one (“dependent Claim 9”) of the claims in the ‘476 patent.  EMED appealed the PTAB’s ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which affirmed the PTAB’s Final Written Decision in our favor on April 3, 2018.  On April 18, 2018, EMED filed a petition for en banc rehearing, which was denied.  On August 16, 2018, EMED petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a Writ of Certiorari to review the Federal Circuit’s upholding the PTAB’s Final Written Decision.  On October 29, 2018, the United States Supreme Court denied EMED’s Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, thus finally affirming the PTAB’s invalidation of ‘476, save for one dependent claim.


Following the PTAB’s Final Written Decision in the IPR regarding the ‘476 patent, EMED filed a new patent application claiming priority back to the application that issued as ‘703, which is the patent at issue in the California case.  Submitted for accelerated examination, this new application issued as US 9,808,576 – “‘576” on November 7, 2017.  On this same date, EMED filed a new case (the “third case”) in the Texas Court claiming patent infringement of ‘576, also directed to our needle sets, and seeking unspecified


- 18 -



damages and a preliminary injunction against marketing and sales of our needle sets.  We filed a Motion to Dismiss or Transfer Venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”), which resulted in the transfer of the third case to SDNY (“SDNY ‘576 matter”) on May 30, 2018.


On April 23, 2018, EMED filed a new civil case (the “fourth case”) against us in the Texas Court asserting antitrust, defamation and unfair business practice claims, and seeking unspecified damages, similar to those previously presented in the California case, described above.  The fourth case also names Andrew Sealfon, then President and CEO of KORU Medical, individually as a defendant.  As the result of a hearing on November 14, 2018, on December 7, 2018, the Court entered an order transferring the fourth case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (the “California Court”).  The California Court set an initial schedule for a preliminary motion phase and on August 30, 2019, EMED filed a second amended complaint.  On September 30, 2019, KORU Medical and Sealfon filed a motion to dismiss that complaint, and Sealfon filed a separate motion to dismiss the case as to him for lack of jurisdiction.  Ultimately, we expect this case to be coordinated or consolidated with the California case, or dismissed, as the California Court sees fit.


At the same hearing on November 14, 2018, the Texas Court granted EMED leave to amend its infringement contentions, following the IPR decision invalidating all but one claim of the ‘476 patent, in order to assert infringement of that sole remaining claim, namely dependent Claim 9.  The Texas Court’s order allowing EMED’s amendment of its infringement contentions against us was entered on December 7, 2018.


The ED Texas ‘476 matter proceeded under EMED’s amended infringement contention to incorporate the surviving dependent Claim 9, which incorporates Claims 1 and 8 of the ‘476 patent, meaning that, to prove infringement on our part, EMED must prove more elements of infringement than it originally charged against us.  In April 2019, EMED served its damages expert’s report opining that EMED’s past infringement damages amount to $1.5 million, and in May KORU Medical served its damages expert’s rebuttal report opining that EMED’s expert miscalculated damages which if properly calculated would amount to less than $100,000.  The Texas Court had set a trial date of August 19, 2019, for the trial of the ED Texas ‘476 matter.  On June 24, 2019, the Texas Court Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation decision finding no infringement, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by KORU Medical’s accused products.  EMED filed its objections on June 26, 2019.  On June 28, 2019, the Texas Court issued a Final Judgment in favor of KORU Medical and adopted the decision of the Magistrate Judge that was issued on June 24, 2019, overruled EMED’s objections, awarded court costs to KORU Medical, and dismissed the case. A final judgment has been entered.  KORU Medical has submitted its Bill of Costs for approximately $16,000 and moved to declare the case exceptional and for recovery of its attorney fees and expenses of approximately $2.3 million in defense of EMED’s assertion of the ‘476 Patent.  EMED has objected to our Bill of Costs, opposed the motion for fees, and filed a notice of appeal of the non-infringement judgment to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  On September 16, 2019, EMED filed its opening appeal brief.  On October 28, 2019, KORU Medical filed its responsive brief, and on November 7, 2019 EMED filed its reply brief.  On November 20, 2019, KORU Medical filed a motion for leave to file a sur-reply brief to respond to a new argument raised by EMED in its reply brief, which EMED opposed, and which the Court has referred to the judicial panel that will hear the appeal for consideration.  The appeal remains pending, with oral argument scheduled for April 8, 2020.  The Texas Court has stayed proceedings in the district court until the appeal process is completed.  KORU Medical’s fee motion remains pending lifting of the stay.


The SDNY ‘576 matter proceeded in the New York court through claim construction on the ‘576 Patent, whereupon KORU Medical sought permission from the New York court to file a motion for summary judgement, to which EMED objected.  The New York court granted KORU Medical’s request, and on July 10, 2019, KORU Medical filed its motion for summary judgement.  EMED opposed that motion, and on August 30, 2019, the New York court granted summary judgement, and dismissed the lawsuit.  A final judgement has been entered.  KORU Medical has submitted a Bill of Costs for approximately $1,500, to which EMED has objected, and has moved the New York court to declare the case exceptional and for recovery of its attorney fees and expenses of at least $1.16 million.  EMED has opposed that motion, which was referred to a United States District Court Magistrate Judge to prepare a report and recommendation.  On November 12, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation that KORU Medical’s fee motion be granted, and KORU Medical be awarded approximately $1.1 million in fees and expenses.  EMED has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, to which KORU Medical has responded, and which objections are now pending before the District Court Judge for resolution.  EMED has also appealed the New York court’s judgment of non-infringement to the Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, which matter also is pending.  EMED’s opening appeal brief was due November 8, 2019, but EMED filed its brief on November 12, 2019.  EMED filed a motion to extend the time to file its opening brief, which KORU Medical opposed, but the motion was granted.  KORU Medical filed its responsive brief on December 23, 2019, on January 9, 2020 EMED filed the joint appendix in support of the parties’ briefing, and on January 13, 2020, EMED filed its reply brief.  The appeal remains pending, waiting for the Court to schedule oral argument.


As is required by the respective Courts in both the SDNY ‘576 matter and the ED Texas ‘476 matter, the parties have engaged in settlement discussions and have conducted a court-sponsored mediation session, which did not result in settlement.


- 19 -



Although we believe KORU Medical has meritorious claims and defenses in all of the above-described actions and proceedings, their outcomes cannot be predicted with any certainty. If any of these actions against us are successful, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.


ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES


Not applicable.


PART II


ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


We are authorized to issue 77,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 75,000,000 are designatedMarket Information

Our common stock $0.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”), and 2,000,000 are designated preferred stock. As of December 31, 2019, 39,502,557 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding and there were approximately 734 stockholders of record.  There were no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.


Our Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “KRMD”.“KRMD.”  We have not paid any cash dividends on our Common Stockcommon stock and do not plan to pay any such dividends in the foreseeable future.  We currently intend to use all available funds for our business operations.


On February 20, 2019, the BoardWe are authorized to issue 77,000,000 shares of Directorscapital stock, of the Company approved non-employee director compensation of  $50,000 annually effective January 1, 2019, and an additional $10,000 annually for the chair of each Board committee effective February 20, 2019, in each case to be paid quarterly half in cash and half inwhich 75,000,000 are designated common stock, at the end$0.01 par value per share, and 2,000,000 are designated preferred stock.  As of each fiscal quarter.  In Mr. Fletcher’s role as Chairman, he will receive an additional $50,000 in annual compensation, to be paid quarterly inFebruary 28, 2022, 44,671,160 shares of KORUour common stock based on the closing pricewere issued and outstanding held by approximately 552 stockholders of therecord.  There were no shares of preferred stock on the last dayissued and outstanding.

Unregistered Sales of each quarter. Equity Securities

The Company issued an aggregate of 58,27349,998 shares of common stock to its non-employee directors during the yearthree months ended December 31, 2019 that were not previously reported in2021 under its 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan.

The Company issued options to purchase 350,000 shares of common stock at a quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed byweighted average exercise price of $3.13 to three new employees during the Company.


During the yearthree months ended December 31, 2019, excluding those previously reported in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed by the Company, there were options exercised for an aggregate 160,000 shares of common stock.2021 under its 2015 Stock Option Plan.


All of the securities issued by the Company as described in this Item were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On November 16, 2020, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program under which the Company may purchase up to $10.0 million of its outstanding common stock through December 31, 2021.  As of December 31, 2020, the Company had purchased 683,271 shares for an aggregate $3,499,358 pursuant to this program. No purchases have been made since that time.

- 23 -



ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


Not applicable.


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included under ITEM 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  This discussion contains forward-looking statements about our business and operations.  Our actual results may differ materially from those we currently anticipate as a result of many factors, including those described under Part I – FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS and elsewhere in this Annual Report.


OVERVIEW


The Company designs, manufactures and markets proprietary portable and innovative medical devices primarily for the ambulatory infusion market as governed by the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) quality and regulatory system and international standards for quality system management.

KORU Medical continues to monitor its operations and government recommendations as they relate to the COVID-19 pandemic. We manufacturecannot predict the effects the pandemic may have on our business, in particular with respect to demand for our products, our strategy, and sell mechanicalour prospects, the effects on our customers, or the impact on our financial results.  For example, our future net revenue growth may continue to be impacted due to fewer new prescriptions for individuals with Primary Immune Deficiency Disease (“PIDD”) and Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”) as a result of patients not seeking care during the pandemic. We believe that the pandemic has precipitated limited availability and rising costs of raw materials and labor. We have accounted for these costs of which we are aware, but we may see a future impact on our financial results if current trends continue.

On March 15, 2021, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its President and Chief Executive Officer, Linda Tharby. Ms. Tharby has over 25 years of executive leadership experience building and leading strong performing global organizations, developing and commercializing products and service innovations, and delivering solutions to patients in the home setting.

The Company began its implementation of secondary sourcing of our needle and tubing sets to Command at the beginning of 2021 and is expected to complete the implementation by the second half of 2022. The Company has entered into a lease commencing March 1, 2022 for a new manufacturing facility and corporate headquarters, into which the Company expects to move in June 2022.

Our revenues derive from three business sources: (i) domestic core, (ii) international core, and (iii) novel therapies.  Our core domestic and international revenues consist of sales of our products for the delivery of subcutaneous drugs that are FDA cleared for use with the KORU Medical infusion pumps,system, with the primary delivery today for immunoglobulin to treat PIDD and single-use flow rateCIDP.  Novel therapies consist of product revenues of our infusion system (syringe drivers, tubing and needle sets that allow patientsneedles) for feasibility/clinical trials (pre-clinical studies, Phase I, Phase II, Phase III) of biopharmaceutical companies in the drug development process as well as non-recurring engineering services revenues received from biopharmaceutical companies to self-administer subcutaneousready or customize the FREEDOM System for clinical and intravenous infusion therapy.  During 2019 we continued to expand our market presence by executing oncommercial use.

The Company achieved four quarters of sequential quarterly growth in 2021, ending the objectives included in our Strategic Plan which was approved by our Boardyear with net revenues of Directors in January 2019.


We ended 2019 with record net sales of $23.2$23.5 million, an increase of 33.5% comparedor 2.8% below 2020, with the same periodshortfall driven by novel therapies where we had a large clinical trial order in 2020. Our domestic core net revenues for 2021 were 0.8% higher than last year mostly due to price in the second half of the year, and our international core net revenues were up 14.5% compared to last year driven primarily by higher sales volume in needle sets, tubing and pump sales, and to a lesser extent, price increases.  The volume increase was driven by what we believe was a result of growth in diagnosis of primary immunodeficiency diseases (“PIDD”) and expansion into the neurology market with expanded Hizentra® indication for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (“CIDP”).key customers.


- 20 -



Our gross margin, percentage, which is our gross profit stated as a percentage of net sales, improved to 64%revenues, for 2021 was 58.6%, upa decline from 62%prior year of 61.8%. The majority of the decline was driven by delays in the priortransition to our secondary manufacturing source. We expect this transition to be completed in the second half of 2022.

Operating expenses in 2021 increased by 28.9%, or $4.6 million compared to last year, mostly due to higher volume and to a lesser extent price increases.


Net income was $0.6 million for the year, compared with $0.9 million for the previous year, driven by higher net sales, offset by increased legal fees for litigation activitycosts associated with building out our executive team, regulatory efforts in support of 510(k) approvals and higher salaryresearch and related expenses resulting from the executive management changes and new hires.


Our cash balance at December 31, 2019, was $5.9 million up from $5.3 million last year.


We appointed R. John Fletcher as Chairman of the Boarddevelopment spend in September 2019 and shareholders elected Kathy S. Frommer as a new, independent membersupport of our board in April 2019.  We received FDA 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for our High-Flo Super26 Subcutaneous Needle Sets,filled key management roles throughout the organization, uplisted to the NASDAQ Capital Market, and rebranded our Company to KORU Medical Systems.innovation efforts.


- 24 -


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Year Ended December 31, 20192021 compared to Year Ended December 31, 20182020


Net SalesRevenues


The following table summarizes our net salesrevenues for the years ended December 31, 2019,2021 and 2018.2020:


 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

Change from Prior Year

 

% of Net Sales

 

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

$

 

%

 

2019

 

2018

 

Net Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

$

19,467,788

 

$

14,235,689

 

$

5,232,099

 

36.8%

 

84.0%

 

82.0%

 

International

 

 

3,694,833

 

 

3,118,048

 

 

576,785

 

18.5%

 

16.0%

 

18.0%

 

Total

 

$

23,162,621

 

$

17,353,737

 

$

5,808,884

 

33.5%

 

 

 

 

 

  Years Ended December 31, Change from Prior Year % of Net Sales 
  2021 2020 $ % 2021 2020 
Net Revenues                
Domestic Core��$19,045,512 $18,895,923 $149,589 0.8% 81.1% 78.2% 
Novel Therapies  443,173  1,782,530  (1,339,357)(75.1%)1.9% 7.3% 
Total Domestic  19,488,685  20,678,453  (1,189,768)(5.8%)83.0% 85.5% 
                 
International Core  3,856,972  3,368,519  488,453 14.5% 16.4% 13.9% 
Novel Therapies  144,518  129,476  15,042 11.6% 0.6% 0.6% 
Total International  4,001,490  3,497,995  503,495 14.4% 17.0% 14.5% 
Total $23,490,175 $24,176,448 $(686,273)(2.8%)    


Net sales increased $5.8Total net revenues decreased $0.7 million or 33.5%2.8% for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared withto the prior year period, driven by lower novel therapies revenue due to a large clinical trial in 2020. Domestic core revenue grew 0.8% mostly due to price in the second half of the year and international core grew 14.5%, driven by growth in all product categories (needles, tubing, and pumps) in the Freedom System.  The growth includes clinical trials at several customers as well as price increases.  We believe the volume growth continues to be driven the growth in the diagnosis of PIDD and expansion into the neurology market with expanded Hizentra® indications for CIDP.key customers.


Gross Profit


Our gross profit for the years ended December 31, 2019,2021, and 20182020 is as follows:


 

Years Ended December 31,

 

Change from Prior Year

 Years Ended December 31, Change from Prior Year

 

2019

 

2018

 

$

 

%

 2021 2020 $ %

Gross Profit

 

$

14,853,810

 

$

10,810,488

 

$

4,043,322

 

37.4%

 $13,769,578 $14,936,086 $(1,166,508(7.8%)

Stated as a Percentage of Net Sales

 

64.1%

 

 

62.3%

 

 

 

 

 

Stated as a Percentage of Net Revenues 58.6% 61.8% 


Gross profit decreased $1.2 million or 7.8% for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $4.0 million or 37.4%2021, as compared to the same period last year. in 2020.

Gross profit, stated as a percentage of net revenues, which is referred to as gross margin, improved 1.8 percentage pointsdeclined to 58.6% for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to 61.8% for the same period last year. The majority of the decline was driven mostly by volumeunfavorable product mix and a delay in the transition to our secondary manufacturing source. This was partially offset by price increases.favorability due to a price increase in the second half of 2021.


Selling, general and administrative, Litigation, and Research and development


Our selling, general and administrative, expenseslitigation and research and development costs for the years ended December 31, 2019,2021, and 20182020 are as follows:


 

Years Ended December 31,

 

Change from Prior Year

 Years Ended December 31, Change from Prior Year

 

2019

 

2018

 

$

 

%

 2021 2020 $ %

Selling, general and administrative

 

$

9,771,744

 

$

8,196,562

 

$

1,575,182

 

19.2%

 $17,862,314 $12,028,309 $5,834,005 48.5% 

Litigation

 

 

3,415,683

 

 

899,003

 

 

2,516,680

 

279.9%

  2,447,213 (2,447,213)(100.0%)

Research and development

 

 

740,475

 

 

241,124

 

 

499,351

 

207.1%

  2,473,669  1,296,754  1,176,915 90.8% 

 

$

13,927,902

 

$

9,336,689

 

$

4,591,213

 

49.2%

 $20,335,983 $15,772,276 $4,563,707 28.9% 

Stated as a Percentage of Net Sales

 

 

60.1%

 

 

53.8%

 

 

 

 

 

Stated as a Percentage of Net Revenues 86.6% 65.2%    


- 21 -



Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1.6$5.8 million, or 19.2%48.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021 compared withto the same period last year. The increase was mostly driven byyear, due to higher salary, and related benefits totaling $1.3 million, mostly due to the executive and senior management changes and headcount additions during the year, including a performance bonus payment to our former interim Chief Executive Officer in the amount of $0.3 million, as well as stock option expense totaling $0.9 million.  Higher consulting fees of $0.3 million related to strategic initiatives, and higher investor relation expenses and director fees also contributed $0.4 million to the increase.  Partially offsetting these expenses were lower general corporate counsel fees and recruiting fees of $2.4 million related to new hires to support expansion of our quality and regulatory, commercial and business development teams. Further contributing to the increase was $1.6 million in costs associated with the departure and replacement of the former chief executive officer and the recruitment of two new Board members, which includes non-cash equity expense of $0.4 million. Market research, testing and consulting fees to support commercialization and regulatory filings of $1.1 million and higher director fees and director and officer liability insurance of $0.8 million also contributed.


- 25 -


Litigation fees continued to increase, up $2.5decreased $2.4 million compared to the same period last year due to the continued defense and increased activity against our competitor.  We have had several favorable rulingssettlement agreement reached with EMED Technologies Corporation (“EMED”) in the New York and Texas courts dismissing those cases and have filed motions for court costs and attorney fees of which one fee motion has been recommended to be granted by the Magistrate Judge in New York, and the fee motion in Texas is stayed pending appeal of the case.  Refer to Note 9 Legal Proceedings in the Notes to the Financial Statements.prior year.


Research and development costsexpenses increased $0.5$1.2 million or 207.1%,for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared with the same period last year mostly due to an increase in headcount and expandedfees related to personnel to support product development initiatives compared with last year.development.


Depreciation and amortization


For the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, depreciation and amortization expense increased $30,966,$44,535, or 10.0%10.6%, compared with the same period last year.  We continued to invest in capital assets, mostly related to production equipment,manufacturing and computer equipment and leasehold improvements, and in patent applications and their maintenance.equipment.


Net IncomeLoss

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

Change from Prior Year

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

$

 

%

Net Income

 

$

564,349

 

$

910,570

 

$

(346,221)

 

(38.0%)

Stated as a Percentage of Net Sales

 

 

2.4%

 

 

5.2%

 

 

 

 

 


  Years Ended December 31, Change from Prior Year
  2021 2020 $ %
Net Loss $(4,562,823)$(1,212,063)$(3,350,760)(276.5%)
Stated as a Percentage of Net Revenues  (19.4%) (5.0%)    

Our net incomeloss for the year ended December 31, 20192021, was $0.6$4.6 million, as compared to net incomeloss of $0.9$1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.  This decrease was2020, driven by increasedhigher selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development costs, partially offset by lower litigation fees,costs, all as described above. Further offsetting the loss was a tax benefit of $0.3 million resulting from book to tax differences related to stock option expense and the tax benefit for the net operating losses of approximately $1.5 million.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


Our principal source of liquidity is our cash of $5.9$25.3 million as of December 31, 2019.  Additionally, we have a $1.52021, and $3.5 million line of funds available under our revolving credit with no outstanding amounts against it.facility. Our principal source of operating cash inflows is from sales of our products to customers. Our principal cash outflows relate to the purchase and production of inventory and related costs, selling, general and administrative expenses and litigation fees.research and development costs.


To develop new products, support future growth, achieve operating efficiencies, and maintain product quality, we must continue to invest in manufacturing technologies, facilities and equipment, and research and development. We believeestimate expenses to be between $27.0 million and $28.0 million in 2022. We expect our 2022 capital investments for manufacturing and leasehold improvements for our new facility to be in aggregate between $1.5 million and $2.0 million, net of financing arrangements.

Our inventory position was $6.1 million at December 31, 2021. We expect these levels to rise as we build to ensure timely order fulfillment as we complete the transition of the manufacturing of our needle sets and tubing products to our secondary source and for supply continuity as we move our manufacturing facility to our new location in 2022. As the relocation and transition to our secondary source are completed, this inventory is expected to convert to a source of cash in the future.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) was signed into law. The CARES Act contains a provision known as the Employee Retention Credit (“ERC”), a refundable payroll tax credit for qualified wages paid to retained full-time employees between March 13, 2020, and December 31, 2020. The Consolidations Appropriations Act (CAA), signed into law on December 27, 2020, significantly modified and expanded the provisions of the ERC to include wages paid in 2021. For 2021, the ERC provides employers a refundable federal tax credit equal to 70% of the first $10,000 of qualified wages and benefits paid to retained employees between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. Credits may be claimed immediately by reducing payroll taxes sent to the Internal Revenue Service. To the extent that the credit exceeds employment withholdings, the employer may request a refund of prior taxes paid. The Company has determined that it has qualified for this credit and anticipates utilizing benefits under this act to aid its liquidity position and as a result has recorded a receivable of $0.7 million as of December 31, 2019, cash on hand and cash expected to be generated from future operating activities will be sufficient to fund our operations, including further research and development, and capital expenditures, for the next 12 months.  We believe KORU Medical’s home infusion products continue to find a solid following in the subcutaneous immunoglobulin market and into new markets like neurology where Hizentra® received an expanded indication for CIDP.2021.


We continue to be in litigation with a competitor, EMED Technologies Corp., (“EMED”) and have incurred a significant amount of legal fees in connection with that process.  AlthoughIn 2020, the Company believes it has meritorious claims and defensespurchased 683,271 shares of its common stock outstanding for $3.5 million under its stock repurchase program, which expired on December 31, 2021. No repurchases under the program were made in the actions and proceedings, their outcomes cannot be predicted with any certainty. If any of these actions against the Company are successful, they could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.2021.


- 26 -


Cash Flows


The following table summarizes our cash flows:

 

 

Year Ended
December 31, 2019

 

Year Ended
December 31, 2018

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

320,620

 

$

1,479,662

 

Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities

 

$

1,310,209

 

$

(1,729,824

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

$

501,297

 

$

14,429

 


  Year Ended
December 31, 2021
 Year Ended
December 31, 2020
 
Net cash used in operating activities $(4,319,510)$(743,323)
Net cash used in investing activities $(366,169)$(1,036,152)
Net cash provided by financing activities $2,705,282 $23,223,832 

- 22 -



Operating Activities


NetOperating cash provided by operating activities of $0.3outflows were $4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 resulted from the2021 and was mostly attributable to net loss adjusted for non-cash charges for stock based compensation of $1.2$3.2 million, depreciation and amortizationan increase in accounts receivable of long lived tangible and intangible asset of $0.3$1.0 million as well as increases in accrued expenses of $0.6 million primarily due to bonus, rebate and legal accrualshigher sales in the fourth quarter of this year compared with last year, an increase in other receivables of $0.7 million for the ERC refund, an increase in prepaids of $0.8 million related to raw materials in transit, all partially offset by a decrease in inventory of $0.7 million, and an increase in accrued taxesaccounts payable of $0.2$0.6 million.  Partially offsetting these were higher accounts receivable of $1.8 million, increased inventory of $0.3 million as we build stock to keep pace with sales growth, as well as severance payments paid this year against last year’s accrual and increases in prepaids of $0.1 million related to directors and officers insurance.


Net cash provided byused in operating activities of $1.5$0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, was primarilymostly attributable to net income of $0.9 million, non-cash charges for stock-based compensation and litigation settlement expense of $0.3$2.9 million, forand an increase in accrued expenses and accrued payroll of $1.4 million, driven by the litigation settlement with EMED and customer rebates.  Further adding to the increase was an increase in depreciation and amortization of long lived tangible and intangible assets, stock based compensation of $0.4 million and a decrease in accounts receivable of $0.5 million.  Partially offsetting$0.7 million due to timing of collections.  Offsetting these waswere primarily working capital changes which include an increase in inventory of $0.4$4.4 million as we buildbuilt inventory to keep pace with sales growth and to ensure timely order fulfillment during the transition to our secondary manufacturing source, an increase our reservein prepaid expenses and other assets of inventory.$0.4 million relating to increased insurance premiums, and a decrease in accrued tax liability of $0.2 million resulting from book to tax differences related to stock option expense.


Investing Activities


Our net cash provided byused in investing activities of $1.3$0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, was mostly the result of the maturation of a certificate of depositprimarily for $1.5 million and the sale of the house the Company owned for $0.2 million, offset by capital expenditures for manufacturing equipment and computers for new hires and replacement of $0.2 million and patent applications and maintenance of existing applications of $0.2 million.  retired computers.

Our net cash used forin investing activities of $1.7$1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, was mostly the result of the purchase of a certificate of deposit.primarily for capital expenditures for research and development and strategic initiatives.


Financing Activities


The $0.5$2.7 million provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was a result of warrants and2021 is attributed to cash received for options exercised duringof $1.3 million, the period.  Net cashissuance of common stock as settlement for litigation of $0.9 million, and $0.5 million on borrowings from indebtedness.

The $23.2 million provided by financing activities was $14,429 for the year ended December 31, 2018, resulting mostly2020 is from the exercise$26.6 million capital raise, net of expenses, and $0.1 million from options less paymentexercised, offset against the repurchase of the Company’s common stock outstanding of $3.5 million.  

We expect that our cash on hand, cash flows from operations, and our fully available credit facility will be sufficient to meet our requirements at least through the next 12 months and thereafter for cancelled shares.the foreseeable future.


See “NOTE 10 — DEBT OBLIGATIONS” for further detail regarding the promissory note and loan agreement, and “NOTE 11 — EQUITY” regarding the equity offering in the accompanying “Notes to Financial Statements” appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Also, see “NOTE 4 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION” for further detail regarding the EMED settlement.

Debt and Borrowing Capacity

Refer to “NOTE 10 — DEBT OBLIGATIONS” in the accompanying “Notes to Financial Statements” appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details regarding debt.

- 27 -


COMMITMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Lease Commitments


We currently rent a masonry and steel frame building erected on 3.27 acres of land located at 24 Carpenter Road, Chester, New York 10918.York.  This facility is used as our headquarters and for our general operations.


On February 28, 2019, we completed year twenty We expect to move in June 2022 from this building into 43,975 square feet of a twenty year lease.  On November 14, 2017, we executed abuilding located at 100 Corporate Drive, Mahwah, New Jersey. The Company’s existing lease extension, which calls for six month extensions beginningexpires December 31, 2022, and the new lease commences March 1, 2019 with the option to renew six times.  The Company exercised three additional renewal options for September 1, 2019, through February 28, 2021.2022, and expires August 31, 2032.

 

We believeRefer to “NOTE 5 – LEASES” in the accompanying “Notes to Financial Statements” appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details regarding our current facilities are suitableoperating and adequate for our current business operations. As we execute on our strategic plan, we continue to seek another location with more square footage to provide us room for growth.  In addition to the increased costsfinance leases.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of occupying a larger space, we expect to incur additional costs in connection with construction and FDA compliance with respect to the new location.


ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Preparationfinancial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted inof the United States (“GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts reportedof assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent liabilities in ourthe financial statements and accompanying notes.  TheseThe SEC has defined a company’s critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of the company’s financial condition and results of operations, and which require the company to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain.  Based on this definition, we have identified some of our more critical accounting estimates below.  We also have other key accounting policies, which involve the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that are significant to understanding our results.  For additional information, see “NOTE 1 — NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES” in the accompanying “Notes to Financial Statements” appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Although we believe that our estimates, assumptions, and judgments are reasonable, they are based on our best knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the future.  Estimates used in accounting are, among other items, allowance for excess and obsolete inventory, useful lives for depreciation and amortization of long lived assets, contingencies and allowances for doubtful accounts.upon information presently available.  Actual results may ultimately differ significantly from ourthese estimates although we do not generally believe such differences would materially affect the financial statements in any individual year.under different assumptions, judgments, or conditions.


Revenue Recognition

- 23 -



NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES


Management of the Company believes that investors’ understanding of the Company’s performance is enhanced by disclosing non-GAAP financial measures as a reasonable basis for comparison of the Company’s ongoing results of operations. These non-GAAP measures should not be considered a substitute for GAAP-basis measures and results. Our non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures of other companies. The table below provides a disclosure of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most closely analogous measure determined in accordance with GAAP.


Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.  They are limited in value because they exclude charges that have a material effect on our reported results and, therefore, should not be relied upon as the sole financial measures to evaluate our financial results.  The non-GAAP financial measures are meant to supplement, and to be viewed in conjunction with, GAAP financial results.


We disclose and discuss Adjusted EBITDA as a non-GAAP financial measure in our public releases, including quarterly earnings releases, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings (net income) before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, reorganization charges, litigation and stock option expenses. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is used by investors and other users of our financial statements as a supplemental financial measure that, when viewed with our GAAP results and the accompanying reconciliation, we believe provides additional information that is useful to gain an understanding of the factors and trends affecting our business. We also believe the disclosure of Adjusted EBITDA helps investors meaningfully evaluate and compare our cash flow generating capacity from quarter to quarter and year to year. Adjusted EBITDA is used by management as a supplemental internal measure for planning and forecasting overall expectations and for evaluating actual results against such expectations. Because management uses Adjusted EBITDA for such purposes, the Company uses Adjusted EBITDA as a significant criterion for determining the amount of annual cash incentive compensation paid to our executive officers and employees. We have historically found that Adjusted EBITDA is superior to other metrics for our company-wide cash incentive program, as it is more easily explained and understood by our typical employee.


A reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures is below:


Reconciliation of GAAP Net Income

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

to Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA:

 

2019

 

2018

 

GAAP Net Income

 

$

564,349

 

$

910,570

 

Tax Expense

 

 

132,069

 

 

266,380

 

Depreciation/Amortization

 

 

340,229

 

 

309,263

 

Interest Income, Net

 

 

(80,663

)

 

(28,104

)

Reorganization Charges

 

 

354,926

 

 

996,447

 

Litigation

 

 

3,415,683

 

 

899,003

 

Stock Option Expense

 

 

888,319

 

 

248,040

 

Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

5,614,912

 

$

3,601,599

 


Reorganization Charges.  We have excluded the effect of Reorganization Charges in calculating our non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA measure.  We incurred significant expenses in connection with the termination and replacement of C-suite executives and senior management which we would not otherwise incur in periods presented as part of our continuing operations.  Reorganization charges include costs related to the replacement of C-suite executives including a transition bonus and recruiting fees, prior to March 31, 2019.


Litigation.We have excluded litigation expenses in calculating our non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA measure.  We continue to evaluate our business performance excluding litigation fees, which we expect will continue in future periods.


Stock Option Expense.  We have excluded the effect of stock option expenses in calculating our non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA measure. Although stock option compensation is a key incentive offered to our employees, we continue to evaluate our business performance excluding stock option compensation expenses. We record non-cash compensation expense related to grants of options and depending upon the size, timing and the terms of the grants, the non-cash compensation expense may vary significantly but will recur in future periods.


- 24 -



RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS


In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13—Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326); Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which amends guidance on reporting credit lossesprovides a single comprehensive model for assets held at amortized cost basis and availableentities to use in accounting for sale debt securities.  For assets held at amortized cost basis, Topic 326 eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold in current GAAP and, instead, requires an entity to reflect its current estimate of all expected credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deductedrevenue arising from the amortized cost basis of the financial assets to present the net amount expected to be collected.  For available for sale debt securities, credit losses should be measured in a manner similar to current GAAP, however Topic 326 will require that credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down.  This ASU affects entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off balance sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash.  The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company is assessing the impact of the adoption of the ASU on its financial statements, disclosure requirements and methods of adoption.


In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13 Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820):  Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure for Fair Value Measurement.  The amendments in this ASU modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820 based on the concepts in the Concepts Statement, including the consideration of costs and benefits. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendments on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements, and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively for only the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial fiscal year of adoption. All other amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented upon their effective date. Early adoption is permitted upon issuance of this ASU. An entity is permitted to early adopt any removed or modified disclosures upon issuance of this ASU and delay adoption of the additional disclosures until their effective date.  The adoption ofcontracts with customers.  We adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2020, is not expected to have a material effect on our financial statement disclosures.


In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15 Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract.  The amendments in this ASU align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is not affected by the amendments in this ASU.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the amendments in this ASU is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for all entities.  The amendments in this ASU should be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption.  The Company adopted this new accounting guidance on January 1, 2020, on a prospectivefull retrospective basis.  The implementationAdoption of this standard isdid not expectedresult in significant changes to our accounting policies, business processes, systems or controls, or have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated operatingour financial position, results of operations and cash flows financial condition or related disclosures.  As such, prior period financial statements were not recast.


In December 2019,The Company’s revenues result from the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12 Income Taxes (Topic 740):  Simplifyingsale of assembled products.  We recognize revenues when shipment occurs, and at which point the Accounting for Income Taxes.  The amendments in this ASU simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing several exceptions including the exception to the general methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period when a year-to-date loss exceeds the anticipated loss for the year.  The amendments also improve consistent application ofcustomer obtains control and simplify GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020.  The Company is assessing the impactownership of the adoption of the ASU on its financial statements, disclosure requirementsgoods.  Shipping costs generally are billed to customers and methods of adoption.are included in sales.


The Company considersgenerally does not accept return of goods shipped unless it is a Company error.  The only credits provided to customers are for defective merchandise.  The Company warrants the applicabilitysyringe driver from defects in materials and impactworkmanship under normal use and the warranty does not include a performance obligation.  The costs under the warranty are expensed as incurred.

Provisions for distributor pricing and annual customer growth rebates are variable consideration and are recorded as a reduction of all recently issued accounting pronouncements. Recent accounting pronouncements not specifically identifiedrevenue in our disclosuresthe same period the related sales are either not applicablerecorded or when it is probable the annual growth target will be achieved.  Rebates are provided to distributors for the difference in selling price to distributor and pricing specified to select customers.

The Company or are not expected toestablished an allowance for charging off uncollectible trade accounts receivable that have both of the following characteristics: (a) They have a material effectcontractual maturity of one year or less, (b) They arose from the sale of goods or services.

Inventory

Inventories of raw materials are stated at the lower of standard cost, which approximates average cost, or market value including allocable overhead.  Work-in-process and finished goods are stated at the lower of standard cost or market value and include direct labor and allocable overhead.

- 28 -


We maintain reserves for excess and obsolete inventory resulting from the potential inability to sell certain products at prices in excess of current carrying costs. We make estimates regarding the future recoverability of the costs of these products and record provisions based on our financial conditionhistorical experience, expiration of sterilization dates and expected future trends. If actual product life cycles, product demand or resultsacceptance of operations.new product introductions are less favorable than projected by management, additional inventory write downs may be required, which could unfavorably affect future operating results.

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS RECENTLY ADOPTED

Refer to “NOTE 1 — NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES” in the accompanying “Notes to Financial Statements” appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET ADOPTED

Refer to “NOTE 1 — NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES” in the accompanying “Notes to Financial Statements” appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


Not applicable.


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


- 2529 -



REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 256)31
Financial Statements
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 202033
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 202034
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity as of December 31, 2021 and 202035
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 202036
Notes to Financial Statements37

- 30 -


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Repro Med Systems, Inc.

Chester, New York


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Repro Med Systems, Inc. (the “Company”)Company) as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, the related statements of operations, changes instockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, December 31, 2019, and 2018, and the related notes to the financial statements (collectively, referred to as the “financial statements”)financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019,2021 and 2018,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, December 31, 2019, and 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.


Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Grant of Stock Options

Description of the Matter:

As discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements, the Company granted 2,000,000 options to purchase shares of its common stock with 10-year terms and a grant-date fair value of $5,699,986 to employees, directors and consultants during the year ended December 31, 2021. Management is required to analyze the fair value of each option granted and amortize it over its vesting period.

We identified the grant of the stock options as a critical audit matter. Management’s estimates regarding the fair value of options result in the application of a high degree of auditor judgment.

- 31 -


How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit:

We obtained an understanding of the Company’s processes and controls in place for determining the fair value of each granted option. We evaluated the option price model management selected to determine the fair value, and analyzed the underlying data used to estimate the fair value of the awards. We also recalculated the fair value of each option granted during the year.

/s/ McGrail Merkel Quinn & Associates, P.C.


We have served as the Company’sCompany's auditor since 2014.


Scranton, Pennsylvania

March 4, 20202, 2022


- 2632 -



REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS


 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 December 31, December 31, 

 

2019

 

2018

 

 2021 2020 

 

 

 

 

 

      

ASSETS

ASSETS

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

CURRENT ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

5,870,929

 

$

3,738,803

 

 $25,334,889 $27,315,286 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

 

 

1,517,927

 

Accounts receivable less allowance for doubtful accounts of $32,645 and $37,500 for December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively

 

 

3,234,521

 

 

1,425,854

 

Accounts receivable less allowance for doubtful accounts of $24,271 and $24,469 for December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, respectively 3,592,886 2,572,954 

Inventory

 

 

2,388,477

 

 

2,103,879

 

 6,106,338 6,829,772 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

387,396

 

 

246,591

 

Other receivables 718,220  
Prepaid expenses and other  1,568,821  807,780 

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS

 

 

11,881,323

 

 

9,033,054

 

 37,321,154 37,525,792 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

611,846

 

 

858,781

 

 1,106,445 1,167,623 

Patents, net of accumulated amortization of $288,967 and $239,581 at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively

 

 

807,135

 

 

632,156

 

Right of use assets, net

 

 

373,734

 

 

 

Deferred tax asset

 

 

188,241

 

 

1,466

 

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $263,729 and $199,899 at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively 808,813 843,587 
Operating lease right-of-use assets 95,553 236,846 
Deferred income tax assets, net 1,941,254 125,274 

Other assets

 

 

19,582

 

 

19,582

 

 19,812 19,812 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

$

13,881,861

 

$

10,545,039

 

 $41,293,031 $39,918,934 

 

     

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

CURRENT LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

Deferred capital gain - current

 

$

 

$

3,763

 

Accounts payable

 

 

572,656

 

 

453,498

 

 $1,227,533 $624,920 

Accrued expenses

 

 

1,296,612

 

 

688,649

 

 2,709,704 2,610,413 
Note Payable 508,583  
Deferred Revenue 90,000  

Accrued payroll and related taxes

 

 

190,265

 

 

421,714

 

 160,603 287,130 

Accrued tax liability

 

 

204,572

 

 

16,608

 

Finance lease liability - current

 

 

5,296

 

 

 

Operating lease liability - current

 

 

136,888

 

 

 

Finance lease liability – current  2,646 
Operating lease liability – current  95,553  141,293 

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES

 

 

2,406,289

 

 

1,584,232

 

 4,791,976 3,666,402 

Finance lease liability, net of current portion

 

 

2,646

 

 

 

Operating lease liability, net of current portion

 

 

236,846

 

 

 

    95,553 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

 

 

2,645,781

 

 

1,584,232

 

  4,791,976  3,761,955 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Refer to Note 8)     

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized, 42,239,788 and 40,932,911 shares issued; 39,502,557 and 38,195,680 shares outstanding at December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively

 

 

422,398

 

 

409,329

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized, 48,044,162 and 46,680,119 shares issued; 44,623,660 and 43,259,617 shares outstanding at December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, respectively 480,441 466,801 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

6,293,069

 

 

4,595,214

 

 40,774,245 35,880,986 

Retained earnings

 

 

4,864,817

 

 

4,300,468

 

 

 

11,580,284

 

 

9,305,011

 

Less: Treasury stock, 2,737,231 shares at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, at cost

 

 

(344,204

)

 

(344,204

)

Treasury stock, 3,420,502 shares at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, at cost (3,843,562) (3,843,562)
Retained (deficit)/earnings  (910,069) 3,652,754 

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

11,236,080

 

 

8,960,807

 

  36,501,055 36,156,979 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

$

13,881,861

 

$

10,545,039

 

 $41,293,031 $39,918,934 


TheSee accompanying notes are an integral part of theseNotes to Financial Statements.


- 2733 -



REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


      

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

For the Years Ended

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31

 

 2021 2020 

 

2019

 

2018

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

NET SALES

 

$

23,162,621

 

$

17,353,737

 

NET REVENUES $23,490,175 $24,176,448 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

8,308,811

 

 

6,543,249

 

  9,720,597  9,240,362 

Gross Profit

 

 

14,853,810

 

 

10,810,488

 

  13,769,578  14,936,086 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

Selling, general and administrative

 

9,771,744

 

 

8,196,562

 

 17,862,314 12,028,309 

Litigation

 

3,415,683

 

 

899,003

 

  2,447,213 

Research and development

 

740,475

 

 

241,124

 

 2,473,669 1,296,754 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

340,229

 

 

309,263

 

  463,130  418,595 

Total Operating Expenses

 

 

14,268,131

 

 

9,645,952

 

  20,799,113  16,190,871 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

Net Operating Profit

 

585,679

 

 

1,164,536

 

Net Operating Loss (7,029,535) (1,254,785)

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

Non-Operating Income/(Expense)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of fixed asset

 

47,830

 

 

4,930

 

Loss on foreign currency exchange

 

(17,754

)

 

(20,620

)

Non-Operating Income     
Gain/(Loss) on foreign currency exchange (28,905) 1,536 
Gain on disposal of fixed assets 1,009 16,591 
Other Income 679,907  

Interest income, net

 

 

80,663

 

 

28,104

 

 13,083 42,395 
TOTAL OTHER INCOME  665,094  60,522 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

INCOME BEFORE TAXES

 

696,418

 

 

1,176,950

 

LOSS BEFORE TAXES (6,364,441) (1,194,263)

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

Income tax expense

 

 

132,069

 

 

266,380

 

Income tax benefit/(expense)  1,801,618  (17,800)

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

NET INCOME

 

$

564,349

 

$

910,570

 

NET LOSS $(4,562,823) $(1,212,063)

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

NET INCOME PER SHARE

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET LOSS PER SHARE     

Basic

 

$

0.01

 

$

0.02

 

 $(0.10) $(0.03)

Diluted

 

$

0.01

 

$

0.02

 

 $(0.10) $(0.03)

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

Basic

 

 

38,778,074

 

 

38,128,260

 

  44,385,032  41,929,736 

Diluted

 

 

39,061,310

 

 

38,921,622

 

  44,385,032  41,929,736 


TheSee accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.Notes to Financial Statements.


- 2834 -



REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.

STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 AND DECEMBER 31, 2018

                   
    Additional Retained   Total 
  Common Stock Paid-in Earnings Treasury Stockholders’ 
  Shares Amount Capital /(Deficit) Stock Equity 
                   
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2019 42,239,788 $422,398 $6,293,069 $4,864,817 $(344,204)$11,236,080 
                   
Issuance of stock-based compensation 32,181  322  240,638      240,960 
Compensation expense related to stock options     1,377,772      1,377,772 
Litigation settlement options     347,008      347,008 
Litigation settlement share issuance 95,238  952  937,142      938,094 
Repurchases of shares         (3,499,358) (3,499,358)
Issuance upon options exercised 719,162  7,191  88,689      95,880 
Capital raise 3,593,750  35,938  26,596,668      26,632,606 
Net loss       (1,212,063)   (1,212,063)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2020 46,680,119 $466,801 $35,880,986 $3,652,754 $(3,843,562)$36,156,979 
                   
Issuance of stock-based compensation 95,725  958  432,696      433,654 
Compensation expense related to stock options     2,049,041      2,049,041 
Issuance of Restricted Stock     224,859      224,859 
Litigation settlement share issuance 95,238  952  937,142      938,094 
Issuance upon options exercised 1,173,080  11,730  1,249,521      1,261,251 
Net loss       (4,562,823)   (4,562,823)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2021 48,044,162 $480,441 $40,774,245 $(910,069)$(3,843,562)$36,501,055 


 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Retained

 

Treasury

 

Stockholders’

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Stock

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2017

 

40,731,529

 

$

407,315

 

$

4,216,718

 

$

3,389,898

 

$

(344,204

)

$

7,669,727

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of stock based compensation

 

99,134

 

 

991

 

 

117,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

118,041

 

Compensation expense related to stock options

 

 

 

 

 

248,040

 

 

 

 

 

 

248,040

 

Cancellation of common stock

 

(22,752

)

 

(227

)

 

(36,594

)

 

 

 

 

 

(36,821

)

Issuance of options exercised

 

125,000

 

 

1,250

 

 

50,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

51,250

 

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

910,570

 

 

 

 

910,570

 

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2018

 

40,932,911

 

$

409,329

 

$

4,595,214

 

$

4,300,468

 

$

(344,204

)

$

8,960,807

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of stock based compensation

 

148,877

 

 

1,489

 

 

315,036

 

 

 

 

 

 

316,525

 

Compensation expense related to stock options

 

 

 

 

 

888,319

 

 

 

 

 

 

888,319

 

Cancellation of common stock

 

(2,000

)

 

(20

)

 

(2,800

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2,820

)

Issuance of options exercised

 

160,000

 

 

1,600

 

 

57,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,900

 

Issuance of warrants exercised

 

1,000,000

 

 

10,000

 

 

440,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

450,000

 

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

564,349

 

 

 

 

564,349

 

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2019

 

42,239,788

 

$

422,398

 

$

6,293,069

 

$

4,864,817

 

$

(344,204

)

$

11,236,080

 


TheSee accompanying notes are an integral part of theseNotes to Financial Statements.


- 2935 -



REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 

$

564,349

 

$

910,570

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock based compensation expense

 

 

1,204,844

 

 

366,081

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

340,229

 

 

309,263

 

Gain on sale of fixed asset

 

 

(47,830

)

 

(4,930

)

Deferred capital gain

 

 

(3,763

)

 

(22,480

)

Deferred taxes

 

 

(186,775

)

 

(23,141

)

Provision for returns and doubtful accounts

 

 

(4,855

)

 

(39,567

)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase)/ Decrease in accounts receivable

 

 

(1,803,812

)

 

475,662

 

Increase in inventory

 

 

(284,598

)

 

(445,198

)

Increase in prepaid expense

 

 

(140,805

)

 

(75,852

)

Decrease in other assets

 

 

 

 

12,000

 

Increase/(Decrease) in accounts payable

 

 

119,158

 

 

(900

)

(Decrease)/Increase in accrued payroll and related taxes

 

 

(231,449

)

 

86,811

 

Increase in accrued expense

 

 

607,963

 

 

30,589

 

Increase/(Decrease) in accrued tax liability

 

 

187,964

 

 

(99,246

)

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

320,620

 

 

1,479,662

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments for capital expenditures

 

 

(201,174

)

 

(297,018

)

Payments for patents

 

 

(224,365

)

 

(184,148

)

Purchase of certificate of deposit

 

 

 

 

(1,500,000

)

Proceeds from certificates of deposit

 

 

1,517,927

 

 

245,342

 

Proceeds on sale of fixed assets

 

 

217,821

 

 

6,000

 

NET CASH PROVIDED BY/(USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

1,310,209

 

 

(1,729,824

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock issuances

 

 

508,900

 

 

51,250

 

Finance lease

 

 

(4,783

)

 

 

Payment for cancelled shares

 

 

(2,820

)

 

(36,821

)

NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

501,297

 

 

14,429

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

 

2,132,126

 

 

(235,733

)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR

 

 

3,738,803

 

 

3,974,536

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR

 

$

5,870,929

 

$

3,738,803

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the years for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

342

 

$

 

Taxes

 

$

130,879

 

$

378,000

 

NON-CASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock as compensation

 

$

316,525

 

$

118,041

 

        
  For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
  2021 2020 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES       
Net Loss $(4,562,823)$(1,212,063)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:       
Stock-based compensation expense  2,707,554  1,618,732 
Stock-based litigation settlement expense    1,285,102 
Depreciation and amortization  463,130  418,595 
Gain on disposal of fixed assets  (1,009) (16,591)
Deferred income taxes  (1,815,980) 62,967 
Provision for doubtful accounts    (8,176)
Abandonment of intangible assets    41,919 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:       
(Increase)/Decrease in accounts receivable  (1,019,932) 669,743 
Decrease/(Increase) in inventory  723,434  (4,441,295)
Increase in other receivables  (718,220)  
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets  (761,041) (420,614)
Increase in accounts payable  602,613  52,264 
(Decrease)/Increase in accrued payroll and related taxes  (126,527) 96,865 
Increase in deferred revenue  90,000   
Increase in accrued expenses  99,291  1,313,801 
Decrease in accrued tax liability    (204,572)
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES  (4,319,510) (743,323)
        
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES       
Purchases of property and equipment  (346,178) (920,604)
Purchases of intangible assets  (29,056) (140,548)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment  9,065  25,000 
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES  (366,169) (1,036,152)
        
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES       
Proceeds from issuance of equity  1,261,251  26,728,486 
Common stock issuance settlement of litigation  938,094   
Purchase of treasury stock    (3,499,358)
Borrowings from indebtedness  924,389  4,976,508 
Payments on indebtedness  (415,806) (4,976,508)
Payments on finance lease liability  (2,646) (5,296)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES  2,705,282  23,223,832 
        
NET (DECREASE)/INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (1,980,397) 21,444,357 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR  27,315,286  5,870,929 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR $25,334,889 $27,315,286 
        
Supplemental Information       
Cash paid during the years 5for:       
Interest $13,241 $27,736 
Income taxes $1,903 $321,983 
Schedule of Non-Cash Operating, Investing and Financing Activities:       
Issuance of common stock as compensation $433,654 $240,960 
Issuance of common stock as settlement for litigation $938,094 $938,094 


TheSee accompanying notes are an integral part of theseNotes to Financial Statements.


- 3036 -



REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2019 AND DECEMBER 31, 2018


NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


NATURE OF OPERATIONS


REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC. (the “Company”, “KORU”“Company,” “KORU Medical,” “KORU,” “we,” “us” or “our”) designs, manufactures and markets proprietary portable and innovative medical devices primarily for the ambulatory infusion market as governed by the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) quality and regulatory system and international standards for quality system management.  The Company operates as one segment.


BASIS OF PRESENTATION

We prepare our financial statements and accompanying notes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).  Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation in our Financial Statements.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS


For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  The Company holds cash in excess of $250,000$250,000 at its depository, which exceeds the FDIC insurance limits and is, therefore, uninsured.


CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSITINVENTORY


The certificate of deposit was recorded at cost plus accrued interest. The certificate of deposit earned interest at a rate of 1.73% and matured in May 2019, at which time the funds were moved into a money market account earning interest at 2.25%.  As of December 31, 2019,  the money market account interest rate was 1.71%.


INVENTORY


Inventories of raw materials are stated at the lower of standard cost, which approximates average cost, or market value including allocable overhead.  Work-in-process and finished goods are stated at the lower of standard cost or market value and include direct labor and allocable overhead.


PATENTS


Costs incurredWe maintain reserves for excess and obsolete inventory resulting from the potential inability to sell certain products at prices in obtaining patents have been capitalized and are being amortized overexcess of current carrying costs.  We make estimates regarding the legal lifefuture recoverability of the patents.costs of these products and record provisions based on historical experience, expiration of sterilization dates and expected future trends.  If actual product life cycles, product demand or acceptance of new product introductions are less favorable than projected by management, additional inventory write downs may be required, which could unfavorably affect future operating results.


INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Certain of our identifiable intangible assets, including patents and trademarks, are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives which range from 6 to 20 years.  All of our intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Our management is responsible for determining if impairment exists and considers various factors when making these determinations.  Amortization expense related to intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $63,830 and $62,177, respectively.

The estimated amortization expense for the succeeding years for the intangible assets is approximately:

Schedule of amortization expense

Year Ending December 31,  
2022 $60,617
2023  59,842
2024  59,842
2025  59,842
2026  59,842
Thereafter  508,828
Total amortization expense $808,813

- 37 -


INCOME TAXES


Deferred income taxes are provided using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences.


The Company believes that it has no uncertain tax positions requiring disclosure or adjustment.  Generally, tax years starting with 2017 are subject to examination by income tax authorities.


PROPERTY EQUIPMENT, AND DEPRECIATIONEQUIPMENT


Property and equipment isare stated at original acquisition cost less accumulated depreciation.  Additions and improvements are capitalized which increase the value or extend the life of an asset, while maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.  When assets are retired or otherwise disposed, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization is depreciated usingremoved from the respective accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in income.  Depreciation and amortization are calculated on the straight-line methodbasis over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets.assets which generally range from 3-10 years for furniture and office equipment, 3-12 years for manufacturing equipment and tooling and shorter of the lease term or their estimated useful lives for leasehold improvements. Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $399,300 and $356,418, respectively.


STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION


The Company maintains various long-term incentivea stock benefit plansoption plan under which it grants stock options and stock to certain executives, key employees and consultants. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  All options are charged against income at their fair value.  The entire compensation expense of the award is recognized over the vesting period. Shares of stock granted for director fees are recorded at the fair value of the shares at the grant date.


- 31 -The Company also maintains an omnibus equity incentive plan. To date the Company has only granted shares of stock for director fees under this plan and those shares of stock granted are recorded at the fair value of the shares at the grant date.



The Company issues restricted stock awards. Restricted stock awards are equity classified and measured at the fair market value of the underlying stock at the grant date. The fair value of restricted stock awards vesting at certain market capitalization thresholds were estimated on the date of grant using the Brownian Motion Monte Carlo lattice model. The fair value of restricted stock awards with time-based vesting were estimated on the date of grant at the current stock price. We recognize restricted stock expense using the straight-line attribution method over the requisite service period and account for forfeitures as they occur.

NET INCOMELOSS PER COMMON SHARE


Basic earnings per share are computed on the weighted average of common shares outstanding during each year.  Diluted earnings per share includeincludes only an increase in the weighted average shares by the common shares issuable upon exercise of employee, director and consultant stock options (See Note 5).options.  See “NOTE 4 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION” for further detail.


Schedule of net income per common share

      

 

For the Years Ended

 

 Years Ended 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

 

 December 31, 2021  December 31, 2020 

 

 

 

 

 

     

Net income

 

$

564,349

 

$

910,570

 

Net loss $(4,562,823) $(1,212,063)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average Outstanding Shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding shares

 

38,778,074

 

 

38,128,260

 

 44,385,032 41,929,736 

Option shares includable

 

 

283,236

 

 

793,362

 

  (a)  (a)

 

 

39,061,310

 

 

38,921,622

 

  44,385,032  41,929,736 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss per share 

Basic

 

$

0.01

 

$

0.02

 

 $(0.10) $(0.03)

Diluted

 

$

0.01

 

$

0.02

 

 $(0.10) $(0.03)


__________

(a)Option shares of 273,110 and 239,935 for 2021 and 2020, respectively were not included as the impact is anti-dilutive.

- 38 -


USE OF ESTIMATES IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principlesGAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Important estimates include but are not limited to asset lives, valuation allowances, inventory valuation, and accruals.


REVENUE RECOGNITION


The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09—2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers.  We adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2018, on a full retrospective basis.  Adoption of this standard did not result in significant changes to our accounting policies, business processes, systems or controls, or have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows or related disclosures.  As such, prior period financial statements were not recast.


The Company’s revenues result from the sale of assembled products.  We recognize revenues when shipment occurs, and at which point the customer obtains control and ownership of the goods.  Shipping costs generally are billed to customers and are included in sales.


The Company generally does not accept return of goods shipped unless it is a Company error.  The only credits provided to customers are for defective merchandise.  The Company warrants the syringe driver from defects in materials and workmanship under normal use and the warranty does not include a performance obligation.  The costs under the warranty are expensed as incurred.


Provisions for distributor pricing and annual customer volumegrowth rebates are variable consideration and are recorded as a reduction of revenue in the same period the related sales are recorded or when it’sit is probable the annual growth target will be achieved.  Rebates are provided to distributors for the difference in selling price to distributor and pricing specified to select customers.


The Company established an allowance for charging off uncollectible trade accounts receivable that have both of the following characteristics: (a) They have a contractual maturity of one year or less, (b) They arose from the sale of goods or services.

The following table summarizes net revenues by geography for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:

Schedule of net sales by geography

        
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2021 2020 
Net Revenues       
Domestic $19,488,685 $20,678,453 
International  4,001,490  3,497,995 
Total $23,490,175 $24,176,448 

LEASES

In February 2016, the FASB issued a standard related to leases to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring the recognition of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet.  Most prominent among the changes in the standard is the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities by the Company for those leases classified as operating leases under current GAAP, while our accounting for capital leases remains substantially unchanged.  Under the standard, disclosures are required to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.  The standard became effective for us on January 1, 2019.  The standard had a material impact on our balance sheets but did not have a material impact on our statements of operations.  See “NOTE 5 LEASES” for further detail.

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS RECENTLY ADOPTED

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740):  Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The amendments in this ASU simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing several exceptions including the exception to the general methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period when a year-to-date loss exceeds the anticipated loss for the year.  The amendments also improve consistent application of and simplify GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020.  The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2021, and it had no impact on our financial statement disclosures.

- 3239 -



RECENTLY ISSUED

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET ADOPTED


In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)ASU No. 2016-13—2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326);: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which amends guidance on reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized cost basis and available for sale debt securities.  For assets held at amortized cost basis, Topic 326 eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold in current GAAP and, instead, requires an entity to reflect its current estimate of all expected credit losses.  The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial assets to present the net amount expected to be collected.  For available for sale debt securities, credit losses should be measured in a manner similar to current GAAP, however Topic 326 will require that credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down.  This ASU affects entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income.  The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off balance sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash.  The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company is assessing the impact of the adoption of the ASU on its financial statements, disclosure requirements and methods of adoption.


In August 2018,March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13 Fair Value Measurement2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 820):  Disclosure Framework – Changes848), which provided elective amendments for entities that have contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to the Disclosure for Fair Value Measurement.be discontinued because of reference rate reform.  The amendments in this ASU modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820 based on the concepts in the Concepts Statement, including the consideration of costs and benefits. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendments on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements, and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty shouldmay be applied to impacted contracts and hedges prospectively for only the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial fiscal year of adoption. All other amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented upon their effective date. Early adoption is permitted upon issuance of this ASU. An entity is permitted to early adopt any removed or modified disclosures upon issuance of this ASU and delay adoption of the additional disclosures until their effective date.  The adoption of this ASU, effective January 1, 2020, is not expected to have a material effect on our financial statement disclosures.


In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15 Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract.  The amendments in this ASU align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is not affected by the amendments in this ASU.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning afterthrough December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the amendments in this ASU is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for all entities.  The amendments in this ASU should be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption.  The Company adopted this new accounting guidance on January 1, 2020, on a prospective basis.  The implementation of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated operating results, cash flows, financial condition or related disclosures.


In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12 Income Taxes (Topic 740):  Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.  The amendments in this ASU simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing several exceptions including the exception to the general methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period when a year-to-date loss exceeds the anticipated loss for the year.  The amendments also improve consistent application of and simplify GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020.31, 2022.  The Company is assessingcurrently evaluating the impact of the adoption of the ASUthis guidance will have on its financial statements, disclosure requirements and methods of adoption.statements.


The Company considers the applicability and impact of all recently issued accounting pronouncements.  Recent accounting pronouncements not specifically identified in our disclosures are either not applicable to the Company or are not expected to have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.


FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTSMEASUREMENTS


Fair value is the exit price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability.  Fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined using assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value should maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  To measure fair value, the Company uses the following fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.  Value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques and includes instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet forof cash trade receivables,and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximateare considered to be representative of their fair values because of the short-term nature of those instruments.  There were no transfers between levels in the fair value based onhierarchy during the short-term maturity of these instruments.year ended December 31, 2021.


- 33 -



ACCOUNTING FORIMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS


The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment at least annuallywhenever events or whenever thechanges in circumstances and situations change such that there is an indicationindicate that the carrying amountsamount of the assets may not be fully recoverable.  AsAn impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than the carrying amount.  The impairment loss, if recognized, would be based on the excess of the carrying value of the impaired asset over its respective fair value.  No impairment losses have been recorded through December 31, 2019, the Company does not believe that any of its assets are impaired.2021.


- 40 -


NOTE 2 INVENTORY


Inventory consists of:


 December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

 

       

Raw materials and Work-in-process

 

$

1,863,978

 

$

1,155,632

 

Raw materials and work-in-process $2,997,807 $2,279,054 

Finished goods

 

 

552,989

 

 

1,020,930

 

  3,176,836  4,562,315 

Total

 

 

2,416,967

 

 

2,176,562

 

 6,174,643 6,841,369 

Less: reserve for obsolete inventory

 

 

28,490

 

 

72,683

 

  (68,305) (11,597)

Inventory, net

 

$

2,388,477

 

$

2,103,879

 

 $6,106,338 $6,829,772 


NOTE 3 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT


Property and equipment consists of the following at:


 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

 

Estimated
Useful Lives

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

$

 

$

54,030

 

 

 

 

Building

 

 

 

 

171,094

 

 

20 years

 

Furniture, office equipment, and leasehold improvements

 

 

1,135,107

 

 

1,058,507

 

 

3-10 years

 

Manufacturing equipment and tooling

 

 

1,295,978

 

 

1,279,865

 

 

3-12 years

 

   Total

 

 

2,431,085

 

 

2,563,496

 

 

 

 

Less: accumulated depreciation

 

 

1,819,239

 

 

1,704,715

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

 

$

611,846

 

$

858,781

 

 

 

 

  December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020 
        
Furniture and office equipment $818,897 $753,536 
Leasehold improvements  556,907  542,796 
Manufacturing equipment and tooling  2,042,675  1,856,909 
   Total property and equipment  3,418,479  3,153,241 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization  (2,312,034) (1,985,618)
Property and equipment, net $1,106,445 $1,167,623 


On May 21, 2019, the Company sold the house it owned for $0.2 million.


Depreciation expense was $286,004 and $273,450 for the years ended December 31, 2019, and ended December 31, 2018, respectively.


NOTE 4 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONSSTOCK-BASED COMPENSATION


BUILDING LEASE


Mr. Pastreich, a former director, is a principal in the entity that owns the building leased by us for our corporate headquarters and manufacturing facility at 24 Carpenter Road, Chester, New York 10918.  On February 28, 2019, we completed year twenty of a twenty year lease with monthly lease payments of $11,042.  On November 14, 2017, we executed a lease extension, which calls for six month extensions beginning March 1, 2019 with the option to renew six times at a monthly lease amount of $12,088. The Company exercised three additional renewal options for September 1, 2019, through February 28, 2021.


The lease payments were $142,964 and $132,504 for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The Company also paid property taxes in the amount of $52,195 and $50,072 for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively.


NOTE 5   STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION


On June 29, 2016, the Board of Directors amendedhas two equity incentive plans: the 2015 Stock Option Plan, (asas amended (the “2015 Plan”) and the “Plan”)  authorizing the Company to grant awards to certain executives, key employees, and consultants under the2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan which was approved by shareholders at the Annual Meeting held on September 6, 2016.  The total number of shares of Common Stock, with respect to which awards may be granted pursuant to the Plan, may not exceed 6,000,000 pursuant to an amendment to the Plan approved by shareholders on April 23, 2019, at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.


- 34 -



(the “2021 Plan”). As of December 31, 2019,2021, there were options to purchase 3,672,500 shares of the Company had 3,647,000 time-basedCompany’s common stock options outstanding to certain executives, key employees and consultants under the 2015 Plan, of which 1,400,000, net of forfeitures,2,000,000 were issued during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019.  The Company also had 1,000,000 performance-based2021. Additional options outstandingmay be issued under the 2015 Plan as outstanding options are forfeited, subject to a maximum 6,000,000 available for issuance under the 2015 Plan. The 2021 Plan provides for the grant of up to 1,000,000 incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock awards, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and/or stock appreciation rights to employees, consultants and directors. As of December 31, 2019,2021, there had been issued 59,658 shares of common stock as directors fees under the 2021 Plan.

Prior to its President and Chief Executive Officer, of which all were issued during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019.


On February 20, 2019, the Board of DirectorsJanuary 1, 2021, each non-employee director of the Company approved an increase in compensation for each non-employee director from $25,000was eligible to $50,000receive $50,000 annually effective(effective January 1, 2019, and an additional $10,000 annually2019), plus $10,000 for the chair of eachchairing a Board committee effective(effective February 20, 2019, in each case2019), all to be paid quarterly half in cash and half in common stock at the endstock.  The Chairman of each fiscal quarter.  On September 30, 2019, the Board of Directorswas eligible to receive an additional $50,000 annually (effective October 1, 2019), all to be paid in common stock.

Effective January 1, 2021, each non-employee director of the Company named R. John Fletcher, a current KORU director, as(other than the Chairman replacing Executive Chairman, Daniel S. Goldberger, who will remain as a non-executive member of KORU’sthe Board) and Board advisor were eligible to receive of Directors.  In Mr. Fletcher’s role as Chairman, he will receive an additional $50,000 in annual compensation, $75,000 annually, to be paid quarterly $12,500 in cash and $6,250 in common stock.  The Chairman of the Board is eligible to receive $100,000 annually, to be paid quarterly $12,500 in cash and $12,500 in common stock.   Effective May 18, 2021, each non-employee director of the Company (other than the Chairman of the Board) and Board advisor are eligible to receive of $110,000 annually, to be paid quarterly $12,500 in cash and $15,000 in common stock.  The Chairman of the Board is eligible to receive $140,000 annually, to be paid quarterly $12,500 in cash and $22,500 in common stock. All payments were and are pro-rated for partial service.

On May 20, 2020, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with EMED Technologies Corporation (“EMED”) to settle all claims in connection with all pending litigation matters between them.  Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company issued to EMED (i) 95,238 restricted stock units, which vested on May 21, 2020, and 95,238 restricted stock units, which vested on January 1, 2021, and (ii) an option to purchase up to 400,000 shares of KORUthe Company’s common stock based on the closingat an exercise price of the stock on the last day of each quarter.$11.21 per share prior to February 1, 2021, which was not exercised.


PursuantOn April 12, 2021, pursuant to Daniel S. Goldberger’san employment agreement dated October 12, 2018,entered into on February 1, 2019, when Donald B. Pettigrew was appointed toMarch 15, 2021, with Linda Tharby, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Goldberger was awarded a performance bonus in the amountCompany issued three restricted stock awards for an aggregate 1,000,000 shares of $270,000common stock for an aggregate stock price of $3,310,000 and each vesting subject to be paid half in cash and half in stockemployment on April 1, 2019.  The number of shares thatthe respective vesting date. These awards were issued totaled 90,604 and was based upon the closing price of the Common Stock of the Company on February 1, 2019, as reported by the OTCQX.  These shares were issued on April 3, 2019.an inducement employment.


- 41 -


2015 STOCK OPTION PLAN, as amended


Time-Based Stock Options


The per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the yearyears ended December 31, 2019,2021, and December 31, 20182020 was $1.33$2.85 and $0.83,$6.53, respectively.  The fair value of each award is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in the yearyears ended December 31, 2019,2021, and December 31, 2018.2020.  Historical information was the primary basis for the selection of the expected volatility, expected dividend yield and the expected lives of the options.  The risk-free interest rate was selected based upon yields of the U.S. Treasury issues with a term equal to the expected life of the option being valued.  The following table summarizes the assumptions used in determining fair value. These assumptions are subjective and generally require significant analysis and judgment to develop. We have recognized tax benefits associated with stock-based compensation of $175,257 and $62,393 for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.


 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividend yield

 

 

0.00%

 

 

0.00%

 

Expected Volatility

 

 

56.1-60.3%

 

 

61.1%-65.2%

 

Weighted-average volatility

 

 

 

 

 

Expected dividends

 

 

 

 

 

Expected term (in years)

 

 

10 Years

 

 

5-10 Years

 

Risk-free rate

 

 

1.60-2.72%

 

 

2.8%-3.15%

 


Schedule of fair value of the stock options granted Black-Scholes option valuation model

  December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020 
        
Dividend yield  0.00%  0.00% 
Expected volatility  74.0177.91%  62.11 - 62.18% 
Weighted-average volatility  0  0 
Expected dividends  0  0 
Expected term (in years)  10 Years  10 Years 
Risk-free rate  1.20-1.62%  0.63 - 0.64% 

The following table summarizes the status of the Company’s stock option plan:


 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at January 1

 

 

2,419,000

 

$

1.00

 

 

1,038,000

 

$

0.41

 

Granted

 

 

1,650,000

 

$

1.92

 

 

1,518,000

 

$

1.34

 

Exercised

 

 

160,000

 

$

0.37

 

 

125,000

 

$

0.41

 

Forfeited

 

 

262,000

 

$

2.74

 

 

12,000

 

$

0.87

 

Outstanding at year end

 

 

3,647,000

 

$

1.32

 

 

2,419,000

 

$

1.00

 

Options exercisable

 

 

1,078,510

 

$

0.82

 

 

785,094

 

$

0.55

 

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period

 

 

 

 

$

1.33

 

 

 

 

$

0.83

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

$

594,956

 

 

 

 

$

248,040

 


Schedule of stock option plan

  December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020 
  Shares Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Shares Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
          
Outstanding at January 1  2,922,494 $2.46  3,647,000 $1.32 
Granted  2,000,000 $3.64  360,000 $9.54 
Exercised  1,062,500 $1.19  884,506 $0.71 
Forfeited  187,494 $3.36  200,000 $2.09 
Outstanding at year end  3,672,500 $3.42  2,922,494 $2.46 
Options exercisable  983,750 $2.73  906,244 $1.40 
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period   $2.85   $6.53 
Stock-based compensation expense   $2,457,788   $874,869 

Total stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, for stock option awards totaled $594,956$2,457,788 and $248,040$874,869 for the yearyears ended December 31, 2019,2021, and 2018,2020, respectively.  Cash received from option exercises for the years ended December 31, 20192021, and 20182020 was $58,900$1,261,251 and $51,250,$95,880, respectively. We have recognized tax benefits associated with options exercised of $665,700 and zero for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.


- 35 -



The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2019,2021, and 2018,2020, was $2,202,678 $5,699,986 and $1,255,234$2,350,264, respectively.  The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2019,2021, and 2018,2020, was $58,900$697,920 and $51,250,$397,962, respectively.


The following table presents information pertaining to options outstanding as of December 31, 2019:2021:


Range of Exercise Price

 

Number
Outstanding

 

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Number
Exercisable

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$0.38-3.15

 

3,647,000

 

6.0 years

 

$

1.32

 

1,078,510

 

$

0.82

 


Schedule of information pertaining to options outstanding

Range of Exercise Price Number
Outstanding
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Number
Exercisable
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
              
$1.57 - $9.76 3,672,500 8.5 years $3.42 983,750 $2.73 

- 42 -


As of December 31, 2019,2021, there was $2,188,008$6,158,501 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the 2015 Plan.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4446 months.  The total fair value of shares vested options was $539,553$1,923,179 and $258,666$803,171 at December 31, 2019,2021, and December 31, 2018,2020, respectively.


Performance-Based Stock Options


The per share weighted average fair value ofThere were no performance-based stock options granted during the yeartwelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021, and 2018, was $1.16 and zero, respectively.  The fair value of each award is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in the year ended December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018.  Historical information was the primary basis for the selection of the expected volatility, expected dividend yield and the expected lives of the options.  The risk-free interest rate was selected based upon yields of the U.S. Treasury issues with a term equal to the expected life of the option being valued.2020.


 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividend yield

 

 

0.00%

 

 

 

Expected Volatility

 

 

58.9%

 

 

 

Weighted-average volatility

 

 

 

 

 

Expected dividends

 

 

 

 

 

Expected term (in years)

 

 

10 Years

 

 

 

Risk-free rate

 

 

2.07%

 

 

 


The following table summarizes the status of the 2015 Plan with respect to performance-based stock options:options as of December 31, 2021:


 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

 

 

Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at January 1

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

Granted

 

1,000,000

 

$

1.70

 

 

 

$

 

Exercised

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

Forfeited

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

Outstanding at year end

 

1,000,000

 

$

1.70

 

 

 

$

 

Options exercisable

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period

 

 

$

1.16

 

 

 

$

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

$

293,363

 

 

 

$

 


Schedule of performance base options outstanding

  December 31, 2021  December 31, 2020 
  Shares Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Shares Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
           
Outstanding at January 1 1,000,000 $1.70   1,000,000 $1.70 
Granted 0 $0   0 $0 
Exercised 0 $0   0 $0 
Forfeited 1,000,000 $1.70   0 $0 
Outstanding at year end 0 $   1,000,000 $1.70 
Options exercisable 0 $0   333,333 $1.70 
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period 0 $   0 $ 
Stock-based compensation expense  $(408,747)   $502,904 

Total performance stock-based compensation expense totaled $293,363$(408,747) and zero$502,904 for the years ended December 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. All performance-based stock options were forfeited as of December31, 2021, and there was 0 unrecognized compensation cost remaining.


- 36 -RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS



On April 12, 2021, pursuant to an employment agreement entered into on March 15, 2021, with Linda Tharby, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and as an inducement to her employment, the Company issued three restricted stock awards for an aggregate 1,000,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate stock price of $3,310,000 and each vesting subject to employment on the respective vesting date. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted duringfollowing table summarizes the yearsactivities for our unvested restricted stock awards for the twelve months ended December 31, 20192021, and 2018, was $1,162,561 and zero, respectively.2020.


  Twelve Months Ended December 31, 
  2021 2020 
  Shares Weighted
Average
Grant-Date Fair Value
 Shares Weighted
Average
Grant-Date Fair Value
 
          
Unvested at January 1 0 $0 0 $0 
Granted 1,000,000 $3.01 0 $0 
Vested 0 $0 0 $0 
Forfeited/canceled 0 $0 0 $0 
Unvested at December 31 1,000,000 $3.01 0 $0 

The following table presents information pertaining to performance-based options outstanding as of December 31, 2019:


Range of Exercise Price

 

Number
Outstanding

 

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Number
Exercisable

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$1.70

 

1,000,000

 

10 years

 

$

1.70

 

 

$

 


As of December 31, 2019,2021, there was $869,198$2,299,726 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share option-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That costunvested employee restricted shares. This amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3139 months. The total fair valueWe have recognized tax benefits associated with restricted stock award compensation of shares vested as of$47,220 and zero for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019,2021 and 2018 was zero for both periods.2020, respectively.


- 43 -


NOTE 6  5 — LEASES


We have finance and operating leases for our corporate office and certain office and computer equipment.  Our leases have remaining lease terms of 1 to 30.6 years, some of which include options to extend the leases annually and some with options to terminate the leases within 1 year.


At contract inception, we evaluate whether an arrangement is or contains a lease for which we are the lessee (that is, arrangements which provide us with the right to control a physical asset for a period of time).  Operating leases are accounted for on the balance sheets with ROU assets being recognized in “Operating lease right-of-use assets” and lease liabilities recognized in “Operating lease liability – current” and “Operating lease liability, net of current portion.” Finance leases are accounted for on the balance sheets recognized in “Property and equipment, net” and lease liabilities recognized in “Finance lease liability – current” and “Finance lease liability, net of current portion.”

Operating lease expenses are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.  With respect to finance leases, amortization of the ROU asset is presented separately from interest expense related to the finance lease liability.

We have elected to combine lease and non-lease components for all lease contracts where we are the lessee.  Additionally, for arrangements with lease terms of 12 months or less, we do not recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities and lease payments are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term with variable lease payments recognized in the period in which the obligation is incurred.  ROU assets are measured for impairment when a triggering event occurs.

The components of lease expense were as follows:


Schedule of components of lease expense

      
 Years Ended 
 December 31, 

 

Year Ended
December 31, 2019

 

 2021 2020 

 

 

 

 

      

Operating lease cost

 

$

149,594

 

 $149,476 $151,686 
Short-term lease cost 146,604 65,227 
Total lease cost $296,080 $216,913 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance lease cost:

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of right-of-use assets

 

$

4,837

 

 $2,586 $5,302 

Interest on lease liabilities

 

 

239

 

 60 237 

Total finance lease cost

 

$

5,076

 

 $2,646 $5,539 


Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows:


Schedule of cash flow information related to leases

 

Year Ended
December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:

 

 

 

Finance cash flows from finance leases

$

4,783

 

Finance lease cost:

 

 

 

Amortization of right-of-use assets

$

4,837

 

Interest on lease liabilities

 

239

 

Total finance lease cost

$

5,076

 

        
  Years Ended 
  December 31, 
  2021 2020 
        
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:       
Operating cash flows from operating leases $141,293 $136,888 
Financing cash flows from finance leases $2,646 $5,296 


- 3744 -



Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows:


 

 

Year Ended
December 31, 2019

 

Operating Leases

 

 

 

 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

$

373,734

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease current liabilities

 

 

136,888

 

Operating lease long term liabilities

 

 

236,846

 

Total operating lease liabilities

 

$

373,734

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance Leases

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, at cost

 

$

12,725

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

4,837

 

Property and equipment, net

 

$

7,888

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance lease current liabilities

 

 

5,296

 

Finance lease long term liabilities

 

 

2,646

 

Total finance lease liabilities

 

$

7,942

 


Schdeule of balance sheet information related to leases

  December 31,
2021
 December 31,
2020
 
Operating Leases       
Operating lease right-of-use assets $95,553 $236,846 
        
Operating lease liability - current  95,553  141,293 
Operating lease liability, net of current portion    95,553 
Total operating lease liabilities $95,553 $236,846 
        
Finance Leases       
Property and equipment, at cost $12,725 $12,725 
Accumulated depreciation  (12,725) (10,139)
Property and equipment, net $ $2,586 
        
Finance lease liability – current    2,646 
Finance lease liability, net of current portion     
Total finance lease liabilities $ $2,646 

  December 31,
2021
 December 31,
2020
 
      
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term     
Operating leases 0.6 Years 1.4 Years 
Finance leases 0 Years 0.7 Years 
      
Weighted Average Discount Rate     
Operating leases 4.75% 4.75% 
Finance leases 4.75% 4.75% 

 

Year Ended
December 31, 2019

Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term

Operating leases

2.4 Years

Finance leases

1.3 Years

Weighted Average Discount Rate

Operating leases

4.75%

Finance leases

4.75%


Maturities of lease liabilities are as follows:


Year Ended December 31,

 

Operating Leases

 

Finance Leases

 

2020

 

$

151,686

 

$

5,533

 

2021

 

 

149,476

 

 

2,705

 

2022

 

 

97,256

 

 

 

Total lease payments

 

 

398,418

 

 

8,238

 

Less imputed interest

 

 

(24,684

)

 

(296

)

Total

 

$

373,734

 

$

7,942

 


Schedule of maturities of lease liabilities

Year Ending December 31, Operating Leases Finance Leases 
2022  97,256  0 
2023  0  0 
2024  0  0 
2025  0  0 
Thereafter  0  0 
Total undiscounted lease payments  97,256    
Less: imputed interest  (1,703) 0 
Total lease liabilities $95,553 $ 

NOTE 76 — FEDERAL AND STATE INCOME TAXES


TheIncome tax expense consisted of the following:

Schedule of provision for income taxes as of December 31, 2019, and 2018 consisted of:

      
  Year Ended
December 31,
2021
 Year Ended
December 31,
2020
 
State income tax:     
Current, net of refund $(12,800)$(17,800)
Federal income tax:       
Deferred  1,814,418  (62,967)
Current    62,967 
Income tax benefit/(expense) $1,801,618 $(17,800)


 

 

December 31,
2019

 

December 31,
2018

 

State income tax:

 

 

 

 

 

Current, net of refund

 

$

22,514

 

$

12,391

 

Federal income tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred

 

 

(186,775

 

23,141

 

Current

 

 

296,330

 

 

230,848

 

Total

 

$

132,069

 

$

266,380

 


- 3845 -



The reconciliation of income taxes shown in the financial statements and amounts computed by applying the Federal expected tax rate of 21% for year 20192021 and 20182020 is as follows:


Schedule of reconciliation of income taxes

 

 

December 31,
2019

 

December 31,
2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before tax

 

$

696,418

 

$

1,176,950

 

Computed expected tax

 

$

146,248

 

$

247,160

 

State income and franchise tax

 

 

22,514

 

 

12,391

 

Other

 

 

(36,693

)

 

6,829

 

Provision for taxes

 

$

132,069

 

$

266,380

 

      
  Year Ended
December 31,
2021
 Year Ended
December 31,
2020
 
      
Loss before taxes $(6,364,441)$(1,194,263)
Income taxes computed at the federal statutory rate $1,336,533 $250,795 
State income and franchise tax  (12,800) (17,800)
Permanent differences and other  477,885  (250,795)
Income tax benefit/(expense) $1,801,618 $(17,800)


The significant components of deferred income tax assets, net are as follows:

Schedule of components of deferred tax assets at December 31, 2019,

  December 31,
2021
 December 31,
2020
 
      
Deferred compensation cost $389,981 $239,036 
Depreciation and amortization  (116,911) (135,092)
R&D credit  142,538    
NOL  1,507,982    
Allowance for bad debts and other  17,664  21,330 
Deferred income tax assets, net $1,941,254 $125,274 

Our U.S. federal and state income tax returns remain open to examination for the tax years 2018 respectively, are as follows:through 2021.


 

 

December 31,
2019

 

December 31,
2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred compensation cost

 

$

259,068

 

$

79,632

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(71,331

)

 

(79,640

)

Allowance for bad debts and other

 

 

504

 

 

1,474

 

Deferred tax asset

 

$

188,241

 

$

1,466

 


NOTE 8  7 — MAJOR CUSTOMERS


For the years ended December 31, 2019,2021 and December 31, 2018,2020, approximately 53%41% and 52%51%, respectively, of the Company’s net product revenues were derived from one major customer.  As of December 31, 2019,2021 and December 31, 2018,2020, accounts receivable due from this customer were $1.9was $1.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively.for each period.


The largest customer in both years is a domestic medical products and supplies distributor.  Although, a number of larger infusion customers have elected to consolidate their purchases through one or more distributors in recent years, we continue to maintain strong direct relationships with them.  We do not believe that their continued purchase of FREEDOM System products and related supplies is contingent upon the distributor.


NOTE 9  8 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


We areThe Company has been and may again become involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business.  Except as described below, KORU Medical is not presently a party to any litigation or other legal proceeding that is believed to be material to its financial condition.

Litigation

From 2013 until May 2020, we were involved in several lawsuits with our principal competitor, EMED.  EMED Technologies Corporation (“EMED”).  EMED has alleged that our needle sets infringeinfringed various patents controlled by EMED.  Certain of these lawsuits also allegealleged antitrust violations, unfair business practices, and various other business tort claims.  We are vigorously defending againstOn May 26, 2020, the parties announced the settlement of all of the lawsuits broughtlitigation between KORU Medical and EMED.  The settlement agreement provides KORU Medical with freedom to operate under EMED’s existing patent portfolio, dismissal of all litigation with prejudice (including the claims against Andrew Sealfon, our former President and Chief Executive Officer), and an equity payment by EMED. Although no assurances can be given, we believe we have meritorious defensesKORU Medical to all of EMED’s claims.EMED.


The initial case involving EMED was filed by us in the United States District CourtRefer to our Form 10-Q for the Eastern District of California on September 20, 2013 (the “California case”), in response to a letter from EMED claiming patent infringement by us, and seeking a declaratory judgment establishingquarterly period ended June 30, 2020 regarding the invalidity of the patent referenced in the letter – EMED’s US patent 8,500,703 – “‘703.”  EMED answered the complaint and asserted patent infringement of the ‘703 patent and several counterclaims relating generally to claims of unfair business practices against us. We responded by adding several claims against EMED, generally relating to claims of unfair business practices on EMED’s part.  Both parties have requested injunctive relief and monetary damages in unspecified amounts.  On June 16, 2015, the California court entered a preliminary injunction against KORU Medical for making certain statements regarding products cleared for use by the FDA, or that could be safely used,dismissed case with KORU Medical’s Freedom60 pump, without voiding the product warranty.  On September 11, 2015, we requested an ex parte reexamination of the ‘703 patent by the US Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). The ex parte reexamination resulted in a Final Office Action, dated July 19, 2017, rejecting all of EMED’s claims in the issued patent.  On January 25, 2018, EMED filed an Appeal Brief with a Petition for Revival, which was accepted.  On April 9, 2018, the USPTO denied EMED’s request for reconsideration of the order rejecting all claims in the ‘703 patent.  On June 26, 2019, the Examiner responded to EMED’s appeal brief and maintained all of the final rejections.  On December 31, 2019, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the USPTO issued its decision sustaining the invalidity of claims 1-10 of the ‘703 patent, but reversing the Examiner’s rejection of claim 11, leaving claim 11 as the only surviving claim of the ‘703 patent.  Claim 11 of the ‘703 patent, however, was not asserted in the California case.  Both the California case and EMED’s appeal of the USPTO rejections are pending.  EMED’s deadline to take action in response to the PTAB decision has not yet expired.our principal competitor, EMED.


- 3946 -



The second court case was filed by EMED in

OTHER

On November 11, 2020, the United States District Court forCompany entered into a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement with Command Medical Products, Inc. (“Command”), pursuant to which Command has agreed to manufacture and supply the Eastern District of Texas (the “Texas Court”) on June 25, 2015, claiming patent infringement on another of its patents (US 8,961,476 – “‘476”), by ourCompany’s subassemblies, needle sets and seeking unspecified monetary damages (“ED Texas ‘476 matter”). This ‘476 patent is relatedtubing products pursuant to the now rejected EMED ‘703 patent.Company’s specifications and purchase orders.  The first binding purchase order pursuant to the Manufacturing and Supply Agreement was made on November 17, 2020 (the “Effective Date”).


On September 17, 2015, we requested an inter partes review (“IPR”)The Manufacturing and Supply Agreement provides for a term of five years from the Effective Date.  Either party may terminate the Manufacturing and Supply Agreement upon a material breach by the other Party that has not been cured within 90 days, upon the bankruptcy or insolvency of the ‘476 patent, and in response to our request, the Court entered an order staying the ED Texas ‘476 matter until after the PTAB made a decision regarding the validity of the patent.  On January 12, 2017, the PTAB issued its Final Written Decision in our favor, invalidating all but one (“dependent Claim 9”) of the claimsother Party or as expressly set forth elsewhere in the ‘476 patent.  EMED appealedAgreement.  If the PTAB’s rulingCompany terminates the Manufacturing and Supply Agreement other than for those reasons within the first three years from the Effective Date, the Company is obligated to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which affirmed the PTAB’s Final Written Decision in our favor on April 3, 2018.  On April 18, 2018, EMED filed a petition for en banc rehearing, which was denied.  On August 16, 2018, EMED petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a Writ of Certioraripay an early termination fee to review the Federal Circuit’s upholding the PTAB’s Final Written Decision.  On October 29, 2018, the United States Supreme Court denied EMED’s Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, thus finally affirming the PTAB’s invalidation of ‘476, save for one dependent claim.Command.


Following the PTAB’s Final Written Decision in the IPR regarding the ‘476 patent, EMED filed a new patent application claiming priority back to the application that issued as ‘703, which is the patent at issue in the California case.  Submitted for accelerated examination, this new application issued as US 9,808,576 – “‘576” on November 7, 2017.  On this same date, EMED filed a new case (the “third case”) in the Texas Court claiming patent infringement of ‘576, also directed to our needle sets, and seeking unspecified damages and a preliminary injunction against marketing and sales of our needle sets.  We filed a Motion to Dismiss or Transfer Venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”), which resulted in the transfer of the third case to SDNY (“SDNY ‘576 matter”) on May 30, 2018.


On April 23, 2018, EMED filed a new civil case (the “fourth case”) against us in the Texas Court asserting antitrust, defamation and unfair business practice claims, and seeking unspecified damages, similar to those previously presented in the California case, described above.  The fourth case also names Andrew Sealfon, then President and CEO of KORU Medical, individually as a defendant.  As the result of a hearing on November 14, 2018, on December 7, 2018, the Court entered an order transferring the fourth case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (the “California Court”).  The California Court set an initial schedule for a preliminary motion phase and on August 30, 2019, EMED filed a second amended complaint.  On September 30, 2019, KORU Medical and Sealfon filed a motion to dismiss that complaint, and Sealfon filed a separate motion to dismiss the case as to him for lack of jurisdiction.  Ultimately, we expect this case to be coordinated or consolidated with the California case, or dismissed, as the California Court sees fit.


At the same hearing on November 14, 2018, the Texas Court granted EMED leave to amend its infringement contentions, following the IPR decision invalidating all but one claim of the ‘476 patent, in order to assert infringement of that sole remaining claim, namely dependent Claim 9.  The Texas Court’s order allowing EMED’s amendment of its infringement contentions against us was entered on December 7, 2018.


The ED Texas ‘476 matter proceeded under EMED’s amended infringement contentionManufacturing and Supply Agreement also includes customary provisions relating to, incorporate the surviving dependent Claimamong other things, delivery, inspection procedures, warranties, quality management, business continuity plans, handling and transport, intellectual property, confidentiality and indemnification.

NOTE 9 which incorporates Claims 1 and 8 of the ‘476 patent, meaning that, to prove infringement on our part, EMED must prove more elements of infringement than it originally charged against us.  In April 2019, EMED served its damages expert’s report opining that EMED’s past infringement damages amount to $1.5 million, and in May KORU Medical served its damages expert’s rebuttal report opining that EMED’s expert miscalculated damages which if properly calculated would amount to less than $100,000.  The Texas Court had set a trial date of August 19, 2019, for the trial of the ED Texas ‘476 matter.  On June 24, 2019, the Texas Court Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation decision finding no infringement, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by KORU Medical’s accused products.  EMED filed its objections on June 26, 2019.  On June 28, 2019, the Texas Court issued a Final Judgment in favor of KORU Medical and adopted the decision of the Magistrate Judge that was issued on June 24, 2019, overruled EMED’s objections, awarded court costs to KORU Medical, and dismissed the case. A final judgment has been entered.  KORU Medical has submitted its Bill of Costs for approximately $16,000 and moved to declare the case exceptional and for recovery of its attorney fees and expenses of approximately $2.3 million in defense of EMED’s assertion of the ‘476 Patent.  EMED has objected to our Bill of Costs, opposed the motion for fees, and filed a notice of appeal of the non-infringement judgment to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  On September 16, 2019, EMED filed its opening appeal brief.  On October 28, 2019, KORU Medical filed its responsive brief, and on November 7, 2019 EMED filed its reply brief.  On November 20, 2019, KORU Medical filed a motion for leave to file a sur-reply brief to respond to a new argument raised by EMED in its reply brief, which EMED opposed, and which the Court has referred to the judicial panel that will hear the appeal for consideration.  The appeal remains pending, with oral argument scheduled for April 8, 2020.  The Texas Court has stayed proceedings in the district court until the appeal process is completed.  KORU Medical’s fee motion remains pending lifting of the stay.


- 40 -



The SDNY ‘576 matter proceeded in the New York court through claim construction on the ‘576 Patent, whereupon KORU Medical sought permission from the New York court to file a motion for summary judgement, to which EMED objected.  The New York court granted KORU Medical’s request, and on July 10, 2019, KORU Medical filed its motion for summary judgement.  EMED opposed that motion, and on August 30, 2019, the New York court granted summary judgement, and dismissed the lawsuit.  A final judgement has been entered.  KORU Medical has submitted a Bill of Costs for approximately $1,500, to which EMED has objected, and has moved the New York court to declare the case exceptional and for recovery of its attorney fees and expenses of at least $1.16 million.  EMED has opposed that motion, which was referred to a United States District Court Magistrate Judge to prepare a report and recommendation.  On November 12, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation that KORU Medical’s fee motion be granted, and KORU Medical be awarded approximately $1.1 million in fees and expenses.  EMED has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, to which KORU Medical has responded, and which objections are now pending before the District Court Judge for resolution.  EMED has also appealed the New York court’s judgment of non-infringement to the Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, which matter also is pending.  EMED’s opening appeal brief was due November 8, 2019, but EMED filed its brief on November 12, 2019.  EMED filed a motion to extend the time to file its opening brief, which KORU Medical opposed, but the motion was granted.  KORU Medical filed its responsive brief on December 23, 2019, on January 9, 2020 EMED filed the joint appendix in support of the parties’ briefing, and on January 13, 2020, EMED filed its reply brief.  The appeal remains pending, waiting for the Court to schedule oral argument.


As is required by the respective Courts in both the SDNY ‘576 matter and the ED Texas ‘476 matter, the parties have engaged in settlement discussions and have conducted a court-sponsored mediation session, which did not result in settlement.


Although we believe KORU Medical has meritorious claims and defenses in all of the above-described actions and proceedings, their outcomes cannot be predicted with any certainty. If any of these actions against us are successful, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.


NOTE 10  EMPLOYEE BENEFITS


We provide a safe harbor 401(k) plan for our employees that allows for employee elective contributions, Company matching contributions and discretionary profit-sharing contributions.  Employee elective contributions are funded through voluntary payroll deductions.  The Company makes safe harbor matching contributions in an amount equal to 100% of the employee’s contribution, not to exceed 3% of employee’s compensation plus 50% of employee’s pay contributed between 3% and 5% of employee’s compensation.compensation.  Company matching expense for the periodyears ended December 31, 2019,2021 and December 31, 2018,2020 was $118,632$166,014 and $121,834,$156,789, respectively.  The Company has not provided for a discretionary profit-sharing contribution.


NOTE 11  10 — DEBT OBLIGATIONS


On February 8, 2018,July 26, 2021, the Company entered into a commercial insurance premium finance and security agreement with AON Premium Finance, LLC in the aggregate principal amount of $0.9 million bearing an annual percentage rate of 4.17%, to finance its insurance premiums. Monthly payments are due on the first of each month beginning August 1, 2021 through June 1, 2022.

On April 14, 2020, the Company issued a Promissory Notepromissory note to KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”) in the aggregate principal amount of $1.5$3.5 million (the “Note”) as an extension of its line of credit, replacing its then current line of credit agreement.  The $3.5 million Note is in the form of a variable rate non-disclosable revolving line of credit loan due on demand with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.25%, collateralized with a certificate of depositPrime Rate announced by the Bank minus 0.75%.  The Note was renewed on June 24, 2021, in the amountsame form with an interest rate of $1.5 million.Prime Rate announced by the Bank minus 1.50%. Interest is due monthly, and all principal and unpaid interest is due on June 1, 2022.  The $3.5 million Note may be prepaid at any time prior to maturity with no prepayment penalties.  The $3.5 million Note contains events of default and other provisions customary for a loan of this type.

In connection with the Note, the Company entered into this arrangement to establish a credit lending history and, in the event needed, to have additional cash on hand for future expansion.  On September 25, 2018, KeyBank released the certificate of deposit as collateral for the loan and the Company executed a Commercial Security Agreement as collateralwith the Bank dated April 14, 2020 (the “Security Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company granted a security interest in substantially all assets of the Company to secure the obligations of the Company under the Note.  The Security Agreement contains terms and conditions typical for the granting of security interests of this kind.

The Company had no amount outstanding against the line of credit as of December 31, 2021.

On April 27, 2020, the Company entered into a Progress Payment Loan and Security Agreement (“PPLSA”) and a Master Security Agreement (the “MSA”), each dated as of April 20, 2020, with Key Equipment Finance, a division of the Bank (“KEF”), to provide up to $2.5 million in financing for equipment purchases from third party vendors.  The PPLSA allows the Company to make draws with KEF to make certain payments to the equipment suppliers prior to the commencement of periodic payments under a term loan. Each draw under the PPLSA will bear interest at a variable rate equal to the then-current Prime Rate and will be secured by the financed equipment under the MSA.  At the end of each calendar quarter or year, the advances made under the PPLSA will be converted to term loans, subject to KEF’s approval of the equipment and certain other closing conditions being met.  Once the draws under the PPLSA are converted into a term loan, each promissory note will bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.07% per annum, subject to adjustment based on KEF’s cost of funds, with principal and interest payable in 84 equal consecutive monthly installments.  Each fixed rate installment promissory note may be prepaid, subject to a penalty if prepaid before the fifth anniversary of its issuance.  As of December 31, 2019, and 2018,2021, the Company had no amount outstanding amounts against the linePPLSA. This PPLSA expires on June 1, 2022.

- 47 -


NOTE 11 — EQUITY

On June 18, 2020, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Piper Sandler & Co. and Canaccord Genuity LLC, as representatives of credit.the several underwriters named therein (the “Underwriters”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell 3,125,000 shares of its common stock.  Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company granted to the Underwriters an option, exercisable for a period of 30 days, to purchase up to an additional 468,750 shares of the Company’s common stock, which the Underwriters exercised in full on June 19, 2020.  The Underwriters purchased the shares pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, including the shares subject to the option, at a price of $7.52 per share.  Proceeds to the Company, net of discounts, commissions, fees and expenses, were $26.6 million.

On November 16, 2020, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program under which the Company may purchase up to $10.0 million of its outstanding common stock through December 31, 2021.  As of December 31, 2020, the Company had purchased 683,271shares since inception of this plan. No purchases were made under the plan in 2021.

NOTE 12 — SUBSEQUENT EVENT

We have entered into a lease for a new facility located at 100 Corporate Drive, Mahwah, New Jersey to serve as our headquarters and for our general operations. We expect to move out of our current building into this 43,975 square foot facility in June 2022. The new lease term commences March 1, 2022 and expires August 31, 2032. Our monthly base rent is approximately $38,000 in the first year commencing March 1, 2022, with annual increases up to approximately $50,000 in the last year.

On February 16, 2022, we extended our current facility lease at 24 Carpenter Road, Chester, New York, which expires on August 31, 2022, to December 31, 2022 to ensure continuity as we transition to our new location in Mahwah, New Jersey.


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


None.


ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officerprincipal executive officer or CEO, and Chief Financial Officerprincipal financial officer or CFO, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of December 31, 2019.2021.  Based on that evaluation, our management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded that as of December 31, 2019,2021, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


- 41 -



MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING


Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive Officerprincipal executive officer and Chief Financial Officer,principal financial officer, and implemented in conjunction with management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.


There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls.  Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.


Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2021.  This assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  Based on this assessment, management determined that, as of December 31, 2019,2021, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting.


- 48 -


CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING


There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarteryear ended December 31, 20192021, that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION


On March 2, 2020, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, the Board of Directors approved annual performance bonuses pursuant to their employment contracts and objectives set by the Company to the following persons in the following amounts:  Donald Pettigrew, President and Chief Executive Officer - $262,440; Karen Fisher, Chief Financial Officer - $94,725; and Manuel Marques, Chief Operating Agreement - $83,525.None.


PART III


ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Information regarding our executive officers required by Item 10 of Part III is set forth in Item 1 of Part I “Business — Executive Officers.”  Information required by Item 10 of Part III regarding our directors and any material changes to the process by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Board of Directors is included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.  Information relating to our Code of Ethics and to compliance with Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act is set forth in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.  We intend to disclose amendments to our Code of Ethics, as well as waivers of the provisions thereof, on our website under the heading “Investors - Governance” at www.korumedical.com.


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Information required by Item 11 of Part III is included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS


Information required by Item 12 of Part III is included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE


Information required by Item 13 of Part III is included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.


- 42 -



ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES


Information required by Item 14 of Part III is included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.


- 49 -


PART IV


ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not required, not applicable, not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or the required information is otherwise included.


The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference as part of this Annual Report.


Exhibit No.Description

Exhibit No.

Description

3.1(i)

3.1(i)

Restated Certificate of Incorporation effective March 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2019).

3.1(ii)

Amended and Restated By-Laws dated December 5, 2018 (incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 7, 2018).

4.1

Description of Securities, (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K filed herewith.

with the SEC on March 23, 2021).

10.1

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement made as of January 1, 2020 between Repro Med Systems, Inc. and Karen Fisher (incorporated by reference to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 24, 2020).*

10.2

Employment Agreement made as of September 4, 2018 between Repro Med Systems, Inc. and Donald B. Pettigrew (incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 4, 2018).*

10.3

Employment Agreement made as of October 10, 2017 between Repro Med Systems, Inc. and Manuel Marques, (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K filed herewith.with the SEC on March 4, 2020).*

10.4

10.3

Lease Extension Agreement dated February 16, 2022 (filed herewith).

10.42015 Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to the Company'sCompany’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on July 28, 2016).

10.5

Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December 17, 2018 by and among Repro Med Systems, Inc., the Sellers named therein and the Purchasers named therein2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company'sCompany’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on April 5, 2021).

10.6Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 23, 2021).
10.7Form of Incentive Stock Option (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 23, 2021).
10.7Management Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 17, 2018)April 14, 2020).

23.1

10.8
Manufacturing and Supply Agreement dated as of November 11, 2020 between Repro Med Systems, Inc. and Command Medical Products (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 12, 2020).  Certain information has been excluded from this exhibit because it is both (i) not material and (ii) would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed.
10.9Separation Agreement and General Release dated January 24, 2021 between the Company and Donald B. Pettigrew (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 23, 2021).+
10.10Promissory Note in the aggregate principal amount of $3.5 million dated April 14, 2020 issued by the Company to KeyBank National Association (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 30, 2020).
10.11Commercial Security Agreement dated April 14, 2020 between the Company and KeyBank National Association (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 30, 2020).

continued

- 50 -


 

Exhibit No.

Description
10.12Loan Agreement dated April 20, 2020 between the Company and KeyBank National Association (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 30, 2020).
10.13Progress Payment Loan and Security Agreement dated as of April 20, 2020 between the Company and Key Equipment Finance, a Division of KeyBank National Association (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 30, 2020).
10.14Master Security Agreement dated as of April 20, 2020 between the Company and Key Equipment Finance, a Division of KeyBank National Association (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 30, 2020).
10.15Employment Agreement effective as of March 15, 2021 between Repro Med Systems, Inc. and Linda Tharby (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 23, 2021).* ^
10.16Lease dated as of January 21, 2022 between the Company and Breit Industrial Canyon NJ1W05 LLC (filed herewith).
23.1Consent of Independent Auditors, filed herewith.

(filed herewith).

31.1

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer of registrant required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

(filed herewith).

31.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of registrant required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

(filed herewith).

32.1

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer of registrant required under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

(filed herewith).

32.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of registrant required under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

(filed herewith).

101

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document - the XBRL Instance Document does not appear in the Interactive Data File (Annual Report on Form 10-K, forbecause its XBRL tags are embedded within the year ended December 31, 2019),Inline XBRL document.

101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

__________

+Certain schedules, appendices and/or exhibits to this agreement have been omitted in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted schedule and/or exhibit will be furnished in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language).

supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission staff upon request.
*Denotes management compensatory agreement or arrangement.
^Certain information has been omitted from this exhibit because it is not material and would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed.


ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY


None.


- 4351 -



SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 4, 2020.2, 2022.


REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.


/s/ Donald B. PettigrewLinda Tharby

Donald B. Pettigrew,Linda Tharby, President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Karen Fisher

Karen Fisher, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 4, 2020.2, 2022.


/s/ R. John Fletcher

R. John Fletcher, Chairman of the Board


/s/ James M. Beck

James M. Beck, Director

/s/ Robert T. Allen

Robert T. Allen, Director


/s/ David Anderson

David Anderson, Director


/s/ James M. Beck

James M. Beck, Director


/s/ Kathy S. Frommer

Kathy S. Frommer, Director


/s/ Daniel S. Goldberger

Daniel S. Goldberger, Director


/s/ Joseph M. Manko, Jr.

Joseph M. Manko, Jr., Director


/s/ Shahriar Matin

Shariar Matin, Director

/s/ Donna French

Donna French, Director

- 4452 -