SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 20152016

Commission File No. 000-25043

201-488-6400

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Shares of Beneficial Interest

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yeso Nox

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yeso Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YesxNoo

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-Kxo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Nox

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s shares of beneficial interest held by non-affiliates was approximately $106$109 million. Computation is based on the closing sales price of such shares as quoted on the over-the-counter-market on April 30, 2015,29, 2016, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter.

As of January 14, 2016,13, 2017, the number of shares of beneficial interest outstanding was 6,726,869.6,740,069.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 7, 20166, 2017 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORM 10-K

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain information included in this Annual Report contains or may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The registrant cautions readers that forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those relating to the registrant’s investment policies and objectives; the financial performance of the registrant; the ability of the registrant to borrow and service its debt; the economic and competitive conditions which affect the registrant’s business; the ability of the registrant to obtain the necessary governmental approvals for the development, expansion or renovation of its properties, the impact of environmental conditions affecting the registrant’s properties, and the registrant’s liquidity and capital resources, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Actual results or outcomes may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of risks and factors, including, without limitation, the registrant’s future financial performance; the availability of capital; general market conditions; national and local economic conditions, particularly long-term interest rates; federal, state and local governmental regulations that affect the registrant; and the competitive environment in which the registrant operates, including, the availability of retail space and residential apartment units in the areas where the registrant’s properties are located. In addition, the registrant’s continued qualification as a real estate investment trust involves the application of highly technical and complex rules of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”). The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Annual Report and the registrant assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons actual results could differ from those projected in such forward-looking statements.

PART I

First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey (“FREIT”) is an equity real estate investment trust (“REIT”) organized in New Jersey in 1961. FREIT acquires, develops, constructs and holds real estate properties for long-term investment and not for resale.

FREIT’s long-range investment policy is to review and evaluate potential real estate investment opportunities for acquisition that it believes will (i) complement its existing investment portfolio, (ii) generate increased income and distributions to its shareholders, and (iii) increase the overall value of FREIT’s portfolio. FREIT’s investments may take the form of wholly-owned fee interests, or if the circumstances warrant diversification of risk, ownership on a joint venture basis with other parties, including employees and affiliates of Hekemian & Co., Inc., FREIT’s managing agent (“Hekemian”) (See “Management Agreement”), provided FREIT is able to maintain management control over the property. While our general investment policy is to hold and maintain properties for the long-term, we may, from time-to-time, sell or trade certain properties in order to (i) obtain capital to be used to purchase, develop or renovate other properties which we believe will provide a higher rate of return and increase the value of our investment portfolio, and (ii) divest properties which we have determined or determine are no longer compatible with our growth strategies and investment objectives for our real estate portfolio.

FREIT Website: All of FREIT’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings for the past three years are available free of charge on FREIT’s website, which can be accessed at http://www.FREITNJ.com.

Fiscal Year 20152016 Developments

The Rotunda property in Baltimore, MDMaryland (owned by FREIT’s 60% owned affiliate Grande Rotunda, LLC) is an 11.5 acre site containing 138,000a building with approximately 132,000 sq. ft. of office buildingspace and approximately 78,00084,000 sq. ft. of retail space on the lower level of the office building. ThisIn September 2013, FREIT began construction to redevelop and expand this property is currently being redeveloped and, expanded.with the exception of tenant improvements, was substantially completed in the third quarter of Fiscal 2016 with costs to complete estimated at $1 million. The redevelopment and expansion plans includeincluded a modernization of the office building and smaller adjacent buildings, construction of 379 residential apartment rental units (referred to as “Icon”), an additional 75,000 square feet of new retail space, and 864 above level parking spaces. On December 9, 2013, GrandeAs of October 31, 2016, the residential section is approximately 29% leased and the retail space is approximately 71% leased. FREIT expects the Rotunda LLC closed with Wells Fargo Bankto generate positive cash flow in the latter half of fiscal year 2017. See “Item 1a-(i) (a)” under the caption Fiscal Year 2016 Developments for details on a construction loanthe financing of up to $120 million to be used to reconfigure and expand its Rotunda property. The construction loan is for a term of four (4) years, with one 12-month extension, at a rate of 225 basis points over the monthly LIBOR. FREIT started construction in September 2013, and is moving forward toward the completion of this construction project.

There were no planned dispositions or acquisitions in fiscal 2015.Fiscal 2016.

On January 11, 2016, FREIT was notified by Lakeland Bank (as successor by merger to Pascack Community Bank) of its election and exercise of the option to purchase the property leased by FREIT to Lakeland Bank located in Rochelle Park, New Jersey having a carrying value of $2,273,000 at October 31, 2015.Jersey. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, Lakeland Bank hashad the right to exercise this option at a price equal to the greater of $3 million or the fair market value of the property as determined by mutual agreement between tenant and landlord. The gain from the saleFREIT and Lakeland Bank agreed to a purchase price of $3.1 million. On June 17, 2016, FREIT sold this property, cannot be determined untilhaving a carrying amount of approximately $2.7 million (including a straight-line rent receivable in the purchase price is determined. However, theamount of approximately $0.5 million), to Lakeland Bank for $3.1 million resulting in a gain of approximately $0.3 million net of sales fees. This sale will resultresults in FREIT’s loss of future annual rents of approximately $241,000.$241,000, which would have increased periodically through September 2023. As the disposal of this property did not represent a strategic shift that would have a major impact on FREIT’s operations or financial results, the property’s operations were not reflected as discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements.

FREIT has two reportable segments: Commercial Properties and Residential Properties. These reportable segments have different types of tenants and are managed separately because each requires different operating strategies and management expertise. Segment information for the three years ended October 31, 20152016 is included in Note 14 “Segment Information” to FREIT’s consolidated financial statements.

FREIT was founded and organized for the principal purpose of acquiring, developing, and owning a portfolio of diverse income producing real estate properties. FREIT’s developed properties include residential apartment communities and commercial properties that consist of multi and single tenanted properties. Our properties are located in New Jersey, Maryland

and New York. We also currently own approximately 7.37 acres of unimproved land in New Jersey.SeeItem 2, “Properties - Portfolio of Investments.” 

FREIT elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. FREIT operates in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT in order to take advantage of certain favorable tax aspects of the REIT structure. Generally, a REIT will not be subject to federal income taxes on that portion of its ordinary income or capital gain that is currently distributed to its equity holders.

As an equity REIT, we generally acquire interests in income producing properties to be held as long-term investments. FREIT’s return on such investments is based on the income generated by such properties mainly in the form of rents.

From time to time, FREIT has sold, and may sell again in the future, certain of its properties in order to (i) obtain capital used or to be used to purchase, develop or renovate other properties which we believe will provide a higher rate of return and increase the value of our investment portfolio, and (ii) divest properties which FREIT has determined or determines are no longer compatible with our growth strategies and investment objectives for our real estate portfolio.

We do not hold any patents, registered trademarks, or licenses. 

Portfolio of Real Estate Investments

At October 31, 2015,2016, FREIT’s real estate holdings included (i) seven (7)eight (8) apartment buildings or complexes containing a total of 1,0931,472 rentable units, (ii) ten (10)nine (9) commercial properties (retail and office) containing approximately 1,265,0001,338,000 square feet of leasable space after giving effect to the sale of a property on June 17, 2016 (See Item 1- a(iii) – “Planned Dispositions and Acquisitions”), including one (1) single tenant store two (2) separate– a building located in Patchogue New York formerly occupied as a supermarket, one acre parcels(1) one-acre parcel subject to a ground leases,lease, and (iii) three (3) parcels of undeveloped land consisting of approximately 7.37 acres in total. FREIT and its subsidiaries own all such properties in fee simple.See Item 2, “Properties - Portfolio of Investments” of this Annual Report for a description of FREIT’s separate investment properties and certain other pertinent information with respect to such properties that is relevant to FREIT’s business.

Investment in Subsidiaries 

The consolidated financial statements (See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K) include the accounts of the following subsidiaries of FREIT:

Westwood Hills, LLC (“Westwood Hills”): FREIT owns a 40% membership interest in Westwood Hills, which owns and operates a 210-unit residential apartment complex in Westwood, NJ.New Jersey.

Wayne PSC, LLC (“Wayne PSC”): FREIT owns a 40% membership interest in Wayne PSC, which owns a 323,000322,000 square foot community shopping center in Wayne, NJ.New Jersey.

S And A Commercial Associates Limited Partnership (“S And A”): S And A owns a 100% interest in Pierre Towers, LLC, which owns a 266-unit residential apartment complex in Hackensack, NJ.New Jersey. FREIT owns a 65% partnership interest in S And A.

Grande Rotunda, LLC: FREIT owns a 60% membership interest in Grande Rotunda, which owns a 217,000291,000 square foot mixed use property (office and retail) and a 379-unit residential apartment complex in Baltimore, MD, and is currently involved inMaryland that has substantially completed a major redevelopment and expansion project at the property.property in the third quarter of Fiscal 2016.

Damascus Centre, LLC: FREIT owns a 70% membership interest in Damascus Centre, LLC which owns a 143,000 square foot shopping center in Damascus, Maryland.

WestFREIT, Corp: FREIT owns a 100% membership interest in WestFREIT, Corp., which owns Westridge, a 252,000253,000 square foot shopping center in Frederick, MD.Maryland.

WestFredic, LLC: FREIT owns a 100% membership interest in WestFredic, LLC, which assumed a $22 million mortgage loan that is secured by Westridge in Frederick, MD.Maryland.

FREIT Regency, LLC: FREIT owns a 100% membership interest in FREIT Regency, LLC, which owns a 132 unit132-unit residential apartment complex located in Middletown, New York.

Employees

On October 31, 2015,2016, FREIT and its subsidiaries had twenty seven (27)thirty (30) full-time employees and seven (7)ten (10) part-time employees who work solely at the properties owned by FREIT or its subsidiaries. The number of part-time employees varies seasonally.

Mr. Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Donald W. Barney, President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. John A. Aiello, Esq., Secretary and Executive Secretary, are the executive officers of FREIT. Mr. Hekemian devotes approximately seventy percent (70%) of his business activities to FREIT, Mr. Barney devotes approximately fifteen percent (15%) of his business activities to FREIT, and Mr. Aiello devotes approximately ten percent (10%) of his business activities to FREIT. Refer to “Item“Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.Governance.” Hekemian & Co., Inc. has been retained by FREIT to manage FREIT’s properties and is responsible for recruiting, on behalf

of FREIT, the personnel required to perform all services related to the operation of FREIT’s properties.See “Management Agreement” below. 

Management Agreement

On April 10, 2002, FREIT and Hekemian & Co. Inc. (“Hekemian”) executed a Management Agreement whereby Hekemian would continue as Managing Agent for FREIT. The term of the Management Agreement was renewed on November 1, 2015 for a two-year term which will expire on October 31, 2017. The Management Agreement automatically renews for successive periods of two years unless either party gives not less than six (6) months prior notice to the other of non-renewal. Hekemian currently manages all the properties owned by FREIT and its affiliates, except for the office building at the Rotunda located in Baltimore, Maryland, which is managed by an independent third party management company. However, FREIT may retain other managing agents to manage properties acquired after April 10, 2002 and to perform various other duties such as sales, acquisitions, and development with respect to any or all properties. Hekemian does not serve as the exclusive property acquisition advisor to FREIT and is not required to offer potential acquisition properties exclusively to FREIT before acquiring those properties for its own account. The Management Agreement includes a detailed schedule of fees for those services, which Hekemian may be called upon to perform. The Management Agreement provides for a termination fee in the event of a termination or non-renewal of the Management Agreement under certain circumstances.

Pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement, FREIT pays Hekemian certain fees and commissions as compensation for its services. From time to time, FREIT engages Hekemian to provide certain additional services, such as consulting services related to development, property sales and financing activities of FREIT. Separate fee arrangements are negotiated between Hekemian and FREIT with respect to such additional services. In Fiscal 2007, FREIT’s Board of Trustees approved and FREIT executed a development fee agreement for the Rotunda redevelopment project for the development services to be provided by Hekemian Development Resources, LLC (“Resources”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hekemian. The development fee agreement, as amended, for the Rotunda provides for Resources to receive a fee equal to 6.375% of the development costs as defined, less the amount of $3 million previously paid to Hekemian for the Rotunda project. In addition, the Board approved the payment of a fee to Resources in the amount of $1.4 million in connection with the revision to the scope of the Rotunda development project. The fee will be paid to Resources upon the following terms: (i) $500,000 of the $1.4 million will be paid on a monthly basis during the design phase (the $500,000 was paid in Fiscal 2013); and (ii) $900,000 of the $1.4 million will be paid upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the multi-family portion of the project.project (the $900,000 is included in accounts payable on consolidated balance sheets at October 31, 2016 and 2015). The minority ownership interest of Grande Rotunda, LLC is owned by Rotunda 100, LLC, which is principally owned by employees of Hekemian, including certain members of the immediate family of Robert S. Hekemian, FREIT’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, and Robert S. Hekemian, Jr., a trusteeTrustee of FREIT, and the members of the Hekemian family have majority management control of these entities.this entity. (See Note 9 to FREIT’s consolidated financial statements.)

Mr. Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and a Trustee of FREIT, is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Hekemian. Mr. Hekemian owns approximately 0.2% of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Hekemian. Mr. Robert S. Hekemian, Jr,Jr., a Trustee of FREIT, is the President of Hekemian, and owns approximately 33.3% of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Hekemian.

Real Estate Financing

FREIT funds acquisition opportunities and the development of its real estate properties largely through debt financing, including mortgage loans against certain of its properties. At October 31, 2015,2016, FREIT’s aggregate outstanding mortgage debt was $307.9$329.7 million with an average interest cost on a weighted average basis of 4.26%4.04%. FREIT has mortgage loans against certain properties which serve as collateral for such loans. See the tables inItem 2, “Properties - Portfolio of Investments” for the outstanding mortgage balances at October 31, 20152016 with respect to each of these properties.

FREIT is highly leveraged and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. This level of indebtedness presents an increase in debt service requirements that could adversely affect the financial condition and results of operations of FREIT. A number of FREIT’s mortgage loans are being amortized over a period that is longer than the terms of such loans; thereby requiring balloon payments at the expiration of the terms of such loans. FREIT has not established a cash reserve sinking fund with respect to such obligations and at this time does not expect to have sufficient funds from operations to make such balloon payments when due under the terms of such loans.See “Liquidity“Liquidity and Capital Resources”under Item 7.

FREIT is subject to the normal risks associated with debt financing, including the risk that FREIT’s cash flow will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; the risk that indebtedness on its properties will not be able to be renewed, repaid or refinanced when due; or that the terms of any renewal or refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of the indebtedness being replaced. If FREIT were unable to refinance its indebtedness on acceptable terms, or at all, FREIT might be forced to dispose of one or more of its properties on disadvantageous terms which might result in losses to FREIT. These losses could have a material adverse effect on FREIT and its ability to make distributions to shareholders and to pay amounts due on its debt. If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and FREIT is unable to meet mortgage payments, the mortgagee could foreclose upon the property, appoint a receiver and receive an assignment of rents and leases or pursue other remedies, all with a consequent loss of revenues and asset value to FREIT. Further, payment obligations on FREIT’s mortgage loans will not be reduced if there is a decline in the economic performance of any of

FREIT’s properties. If any such decline in economic performance occurs, FREIT’s revenues, earnings, and funds available for distribution to shareholders would be adversely affected.

Neither FREIT’s Declaration of Trust nor any policy statement formally adopted by the Board limits either the total amount of indebtedness or the specified percentage of indebtedness (based on the total capitalization of FREIT), which may be incurred by FREIT. Accordingly, FREIT may incur in the future additional secured or unsecured indebtedness in furtherance of its business activities, including, if or when necessary, to refinance its existing debt. Future debt incurred by FREIT could bear interest at rates which are higher than the rates on FREIT’s existing debt. Future debt incurred by FREIT could also bear interest at a variable rate. Increases in interest rates would increase FREIT’s variable interest costs (to the extent that the related indebtedness was not protected by interest rate protection arrangements), which could have a material adverse effect on FREIT and its ability to make distributions to shareholders and to pay amounts due on its debt or cause FREIT to be in default under its debt. Further, in the future, FREIT may not be able to, or may determine that it is not able to, obtain financing for property acquisitions or for capital expenditures to develop or improve its properties on terms which are acceptable to FREIT. In such event, FREIT might elect to defer certain projects unless alternative sources of capital were available, such as through an equity or debt offering by FREIT.

Competitive Conditions

FREIT is subject to normal competition with other investors to acquire real property and to profitably manage such property. Numerous other REITs, banks, insurance companies and pension funds, as well as corporate and individual developers and owners of real estate, compete with FREIT in seeking properties for acquisition and for tenants. Many of these competitors have significantly greater financial resources than FREIT.

In addition, retailers at FREIT's commercial properties face increasing competition from discount shopping centers, outlet malls, sales through catalogue offerings, discount shopping clubs, marketing and shopping through cable and computer sources, particularly over the internet, and telemarketing. In many markets, the trade areas of FREIT's commercial properties overlap with the trade areas of other shopping centers. Renovations and expansions at those competing shopping centers and malls could negatively affect FREIT's commercial properties by encouraging shoppers to make their purchases at such new, expanded or renovated shopping centers and malls. Increased competition through these various sources could adversely affect the viability of FREIT's tenants, and any new commercial real estate competition developed in the future could potentially have an adverse effect on the revenues of and earnings from FREIT's commercial properties.

The revenues and value of FREIT’s commercial and residential apartment properties may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including, without limitation, the national economic climate; the regional economic climate (which may be adversely affected by plant closings, industry slow-downs and other local business factors); local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of retail space or apartment units); perceptions by retailers or shoppers of the security, safety, convenience and attractiveness of a shopping center; perception by residential tenants of the safety, convenience and attractiveness of an apartment building or complex; the proximity and the number of competing shopping centers and apartment complexes; the availability of recreational and other amenities and the willingness and ability of the owner to provide capable management and adequate maintenance. In addition, other factors may adversely affect the fair market value of a commercial property or apartment building or complex without necessarily affecting the revenues, including changes in government regulations (such as limitations on development or on hours of operation) changes in tax laws or rates, and potential environmental or other legal liabilities.

FREIT believes that its revenues and earnings, its ability to meet its debt obligations, and its funds available for distribution to shareholders would be adversely affected if space in FREIT's multi-store shopping center properties could not be leased or if anchor store tenants or satellite tenants failed to meet their lease obligations.

The success of FREIT's investment in its shopping center properties is largely dependent upon the success of its tenants. Unfavorable economic, demographic, or competitive conditions may adversely affect the financial condition of tenants and consequently the lease revenues from and the value of FREIT's investments in its shopping center properties. If the sales of stores operating in FREIT's shopping center properties were to decline due to deteriorating economic conditions, the tenants may be unable to pay their base rents or meet other lease charges and fees due to FREIT. In addition, any lease provisions providing for additional rent based on a percentage of sales would not be operative in this economic environment. In the event of default by a tenant, FREIT could suffer a loss of rent and experience extraordinary delays while incurring additional costs in enforcing its rights under the lease, which FREIT may not be able to recapture.

As at October 31, 2015,2016, the following table lists the ten (10) largest commercial tenants, which account for approximately 57.2%54.3% of FREIT’s leased commercial rental space and 38.9%33.9% of fixed commercial rents.

There is no assurance that we will be able to retain tenants at our commercial properties upon expiration of their leases. Upon expiration or termination of leases for space located in FREIT's commercial properties, the premises may not be relet or the terms of reletting (including the cost of concessions to tenants) may not be as favorable as lease terms for the terminated lease. If FREIT were unable to promptly relet all or a substantial portion of this space or if the rental rates upon such reletting were significantly lower than current or expected rates, FREIT's revenues and earnings, FREIT’s ability to service its debt, and FREIT’s ability to make expected distributions to its shareholders, could be adversely affected.

The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company and its affiliates, including Pathmark Stores, Inc. (“A&P”), filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code as disclosed in the bankruptcy filings. On December 23, 2015, FREIT was notified by A&P thatfilings and Pathmark’s lease ofat FREIT’s Patchogue, New York property would bewas rejected as of December 31, 2015. FREIT has recorded an expense in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2015 of $1,046,000 ($0.15 per share basic and diluted) for provision for loss related to the straight line rent receivable for Pathmark. The provision hashad no impact on cash flow orbut it did have an impact on funds from operations. However, asAs a result of the lease beinghaving been rejected, FREIT will loseis losing annual rents of approximately $1.4 million until the store is re-leased. See“Results of Operations – Segment Information – Commercial Segment” under Item 7 for further information

On February 3, 2012, Grande Rotunda, LLC, entered into a lease termination agreement (“Agreement”) with Giant, the tenant and operator of the 35,994 sq. ft. Giant supermarket at the Rotunda. Under the terms of the Agreement, Giant agreed to (i) waive its right to extend the term of the lease through March 31, 2035, (ii) terminate the lease and surrender the premises to Grande Rotunda, LLC no later than the earlier of commencement of the redevelopment of the property or March 31, 2015, and (iii) notwithstanding any earlier termination date, continue to pay monthly fixed rent payments plus its share of common area maintenance charges and taxes for the Rotunda property through March 31, 2015. Grande Rotunda, LLC has agreed (i) not to lease more than 20,000 sq. ft. of any space in the property for use as a food supermarket through March 31, 2035, and (ii) if Grande Rotunda, LLC decides to lease such space for use as a food supermarket, it must first offer Giant the space for the same use under terms acceptable to Grande Rotunda, LLC and Giant will have thirty days to accept the offer before the space may be leased to a third party. In November 2013, FREIT entered into a lease agreement with Mom’s Organic Market Inc., for approximately 14,300 square feet which was subsequently expanded in March 2014 by approximately 3,250 square feet. In accordance with the agreement Grande Rotunda, LLC has with Giant, Grande Rotunda, LLC first offered the lease of this space to Giant which declined the offer.

During Fiscal 2011, FREIT was notified by Giant of Maryland, LLC (“Giant”), the former tenant and operator of the 55,330 sq. ft. Giant Supermarketsupermarket at the Westridge Square shopping center, that it would not extend the term of its lease, which expired on October 31, 2011. On July 27, 2012, FREIT signed a lease agreement with G-Mart Frederick, Inc., the operator of an international grocery store chain (“G-Mart”), for a significant portion (40,000 square feet) of the space previously occupied by Giant. G-Mart opened for business at the center in September 2013. However, effective November 1, 2014, G-Mart notified FREIT that it had vacated its space at the Westridge Square shopping center and would be terminating its lease. A new lease for this 40,000 square foot space was signed by H-Mart, an international grocery store chain, in November 2014 and subsequently H-Mart expanded its space by an additional 15,300 square feet. H-Mart is currently renovating its space but began paying rent in May 2015. All of the tenant improvements related to G-Mart will be utilized for H-Mart.

There were no other material lease expirations during Fiscal 20152016 and Fiscal 2014.2015. There are no additional material lease expirations expected during Fiscal 2016.2017.

Equity real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Accordingly, the ability of FREIT to vary its portfolio in response to changing economic, market or other conditions is limited. Also, FREIT's interests in its partially owned subsidiaries are subject to transfer constraints imposed by the operating agreements which govern FREIT’s investment in these partially owned subsidiaries. Even without such restrictions on the transfer of its interests, FREIT believes that there would be a limited market for its interests in these partially owned subsidiaries.

If FREIT had to liquidate all or substantially all of its real estate holdings, the value of such assets would likely be diminished if a sale were required to be completed in a limited time frame. The proceeds to FREIT from any such sale of the assets in FREIT’s real estate portfolio might be less than the fair market value of those assets.

Impact of Governmental Laws and Regulations on Registrant's Business

FREIT’s properties are subject to various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, including those relating to the environment and local rent control and zoning ordinances.

Both federal and state governments are concerned with the impact of real estate construction and development programs upon the environment. Environmental legislation affects the cost of selling real estate, the cost to develop real estate, and the risks associated with purchasing real estate.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, an owner of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at, on, in or under such property, as well as certain other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and penalties and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property). Such laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owners knew of, or were responsible for, the presence or disposal of such substances. Such liability may be imposed on the owner in connection with the activities of any operator of, or tenant at, the property. The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal injury or property damages and the property owner's liability therefore could exceed the value of the property and/or the aggregate assets of the owner. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner's ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral. If FREIT incurred any such liability, it could reduce FREIT's revenues and ability to make distributions to its shareholders.

A property can also be negatively impacted by either physical contamination or by virtue of an adverse effect upon value attributable to the migration of hazardous or toxic substances, or other contaminants that have or may have emanated from other properties.

At this time, FREIT is aware of the following environmental matters affecting its properties:

This property is in a Flood Hazard Zone. FREIT maintains flood insurance in the amount of $500,000 for the subject property, which is the maximum available under the Flood Program for the property. Any reconstruction of that portion of the property situated in the flood hazard zone is subject to regulations promulgated by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ("NJDEP"), which could require extraordinary construction methods.

The redeveloped Franklin Crossing shopping center was completed during the summer of 1997. Also in 1997, a historical discharge of hazardous materials was discovered at Franklin Crossing. The discharge was reported to the NJDEP in accordance with applicable regulations. FREIT completed the remediation required by the NJDEP.

In November 1999, FREIT received a No Further Action Letter from the NJDEP concerning the contaminated soil at Franklin Crossing. Monitoring of the groundwater will continue pursuant to a memorandum of agreement filed with the NJDEP.

Prior to its purchase, in November 2002 by Wayne PSC, LLC, a Phase I and Phase II Environmental Assessment of the Preakness shopping center revealed soil and ground water contamination with Percloroethylene (Dry Cleaning Fluid) caused by the mishandling of this chemical by a former dry cleaner tenant. The seller of the center to Wayne PSC, LLC has paid for and completed all required remediation work in accordance with the NJDEP standards, and this matter is now closed.

a) The State of New Jersey has adopted an underground fuel storage tank law and various regulations with respect to underground storage tanks.

FREIT no longer has underground storage tanks on any of its properties.

In prior years, FREIT conducted environmental audits for all of its properties except for its undeveloped land and retail properties in Franklin Lakes (Franklin Crossing) and Glen Rock, New Jersey. Except as notedfor the Preakness Shopping center in subparagraph (iii) above,Wayne, New Jersey which has been remediated by the seller, the environmental reports secured by FREIT have not revealed any environmental conditions on its properties which require remediation pursuant to any applicable federal or state law or regulation.

b) FREIT has determined that several of its properties contain lead based paint (“LBP”). FREIT believes that it complies with all federal, state and local requirements as they pertain to LBP.

FREIT does not believe that the environmental conditions described in subparagraphs (i) - (iv) above will have a material adverse effect upon the capital expenditures, revenues, earnings, financial condition or competitive position of FREIT.

Each of the apartment buildings or complexes owned by FREIT is subject to some form of rent control ordinance which limits the amount by which FREIT can increase the rent for renewed leases, and in some cases, limits the amount of rent which FREIT can charge for vacated units, except for Westwood Hills, and The Boulders at Rockaway, and Icon which are not subject to any rent control law or regulation.

Local zoning ordinances may prevent FREIT from renovating, expanding or converting its existing properties for their highest and best use as determined by the Board.

FREIT does not engage in operations in foreign countries and it does not derive any portion of its revenues from customers in foreign countries.

Almost all of FREIT’s income and cash flow are derived from the net rental income (revenues after expenses) from our properties. FREIT’s business and financial results are affected by the following fundamental factors:

A negative or adverse quality change in the above factors could potentially cause a detrimental effect on FREIT’s revenue, earnings and cash flow. If rental revenues decline, we would expect to have less cash available to pay our indebtedness and distribute to our shareholders.

Adverse Changes in General Economic Climate: FREIT derives the majority of its revenues from renting apartments to individuals or families, and from retailers renting space at its shopping centers. The improvement in the U.S. economy has been uneven, but trending data seem to indicate the recovery has finally gained traction. The following U.S. developments and factors are positive: (a) the improvement in the housing market is expected to continue and drag along ancillary services; (b) falling energy prices and slower increases in health care costs are keeping inflation low; (c) increasing consumer confidence should push spending modestly higher in 2016;2017; (d) private sector employment is expected to continue to grow steadily; and (e) credit availability has improved. These factors should aid economic growth in the United States. However, there are factors that can be a drag on long-term economic growth, including, without limitation: (i) continued political gridlock in

Washington; (ii) regulatory uncertainties; (iii) continued infrastructure deterioration; (iv) a dramatic international crisis; (v) increasing concerns regarding terrorism; (vi) continued stagnant economies in Europe and Asia; and (vii) uncertainty regarding the upcoming presidential election in the Unites States.Asia.

We receiveFREIT receives a substantial portion of ourits operating income as rent under long-term leases with commercial tenants. At any time, any of our commercial tenants could experience a downturn in its business that might weaken its financial condition. These tenants might defer or fail to make rental payments when due, delay lease commencement, voluntarily vacate the premises or declare bankruptcy, which could result in the termination of the tenant’s lease, and could result in material losses to us and harm to our results of operations. Also, it might take time to terminate leases of underperforming or nonperforming tenants and weFREIT might incur costs to remove such tenants. Also, if tenants are unable to comply with the terms of ourits leases, weFREIT might modify lease terms in ways that are less favorable to us.FREIT.

Tenants unable to pay rent:Financially distressed tenants may be unable to pay rents and expense recovery charges, where applicable, and may default on their leases. Enforcing ourFREIT’s rights as landlord could result in substantial costs and may not result in a full recovery of unpaid rent. If a tenant files for bankruptcy, the tenant’s lease may be terminated. In each such instance FREIT’s income and cash flow would be negatively impacted. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company and its affiliates, including Pathmark Stores, Inc. (“A&P”), filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code as disclosed in the bankruptcy filings. On December 23, 2015, FREIT was notified by A&P that Pathmark’s lease of FREIT’s Patchogue, New York property would be rejected as of December 31, 2015. FREIT has recorded an expense in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2015 of $1,046,000 ($0.15 per share basic and diluted) for provision for loss related to the straight line rent receivable for Pathmark. The provision has no impact on cash flow or funds from operations. However, as a result of the lease being rejected, FREIT will lose annual rents of approximately $1.4 million until the store is re-leased. See“Renewal of Leases and Reletting of Space”under Item 1 and“Results of Operations – Segment Information – Commercial Segment” under Item 7 for further information.

Costs of re-renting space: If tenants fail to renew leases, fail to exercise renewal options, or terminate their leases early, the lost rents due to vacancy and the costs of re-renting the space could prove costly to FREIT. In addition to cleaning and renovating the vacated space, we may be required to grant concessions to a new tenant, and may incur leasing brokerage commissions. The lease terms to a new tenant may be less favorable than the prior tenant’s lease terms, and will negatively impact FREIT’s income and cash flow and adversely affect ourFREIT’s ability to pay mortgage debt and interest or make distributions to ourits shareholders. A&P filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code as disclosed in the bankruptcy filings and Pathmark’s lease at FREIT’s Patchogue, New York property was rejected as of December 31, 2015. FREIT recorded an expense in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2015 of $1,046,000 ($0.15 per share basic and diluted) for provision for loss related to the straight line rent receivable for Pathmark. The provision had no impact on cash flow but did have an impact on funds from operations. As a result of the lease having been rejected, FREIT is losing annual rents of approximately $1.4 million until the store is re-leased. See preceding risk factor captioned“Renewal of Leases and Reletting of Space” under Item 1 and “Tenants unable to pay rent”Results of Operations – Segment Information – Commercial Segment.” under Item 7 for further information.

Inflation may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations:Increased inflation could have a pronounced negative impact on ourFREIT’s operating and administrative expenses, as these costs may increase at a higher rate than ourFREIT’s rents. While increases in most operating expenses at ourFREIT’s commercial properties can be passed on to retail tenants, increases in expenses at ourits residential properties cannot be passed on to residential tenants. Unreimbursed increased operating expenses may reduce cash flow available for payment of mortgage debt and interest, and for distributions to shareholders.

Development and construction risks:As part of its investment strategy, FREIT seeks to acquire property for development and construction, as well as to develop and build on land already in its portfolio. FREIT has recently substantially completed a major redevelopment and expansion project, atwith the Damascus Center and is engaged in a major redevelopmentexception of tenant improvements, at the Rotunda property in Baltimore, Maryland. Development and construction activities are challenged with the following risks, which may adversely affect ourFREIT’s cash flow:

Debt financing could adversely affect income and cash flow: FREIT relies on debt financing to fund its growth through acquisitions and development activities. To the extent third party debt financing is not available or not available on acceptable terms, acquisitions and development activities will be curtailed.

As of October 31, 2015,2016, FREIT had approximately $215.9$215.8 million of non-recourse mortgage debt subject to fixed interest rates, and $92approximately $114 million of variable interest rate debt relating to outstanding draws on the Grande Rotunda, LLC construction loan. These mortgages are being repaid over periods (amortization schedules) that are longer than the terms of the mortgages. Accordingly, when the mortgages become due (at various times), significant balloon payments (the unpaid principal amounts) will be required. FREIT expects to refinance the individual mortgages with new mortgages when their terms expire. To this extent we haveFREIT has exposure to capital availability and interest rate risk. If interest rates, at the time any individual mortgage note is due, are higher than the current fixed interest rate, higher debt service may be required and/or refinancing proceeds may be less than the amount of the mortgage debt being retired. To the extent we areFREIT is unable to refinance ourits indebtedness on acceptable terms, weFREIT may need to dispose of one or more of ourits properties upon disadvantageous terms.

OurFREIT’s revolving $12.8 million credit line (of which $12.8 million was available as of October 31, 2015)2016), and ourthe Grande Rotunda, LLC construction loan, which was entered into on December 9, 2013, contain financial covenants that could restrict ourFREIT’s acquisition activities and result in a default on these loans if we failFREIT fails to satisfy these covenants.

Failure of banking and financing institutions:Banking and financing institutions such as insurance companies provide FREIT with credit lines and construction financing. The credit lines available to FREIT may be used for a variety of business purposes, including general corporate purposes, acquisitions, construction, and letters of credit. Construction financing enables FREIT to develop new properties, or renovate or expand existing properties. A failure of the banking institution making credit lines available may render the line unavailable and adversely affect FREIT’s liquidity, and negatively impact ourFREIT’s operations in a number of ways. A failure of a financial institution unable to fund its construction financing obligations to FREIT may cause the construction to halt or be delayed. Substitute financing may be significantly more expensive, and construction delays may subject FREIT to delivery penalties.

Failure of insurance carriers:FREIT’s properties are insured against unforeseen liability claims, property damages, and other hazards. The insurance companies FREIT uses have good ratings at the time the policies are put into effect. Financial failure of ourFREIT’s carriers may result in their inability to pay current and future claims. This inability to pay claims may have an adverse impact on FREIT’s financial condition. In addition, a failure of a FREIT insurance carrier may cause FREIT’s insurance renewal or replacement policy costs to increase.

Real estate is a competitive business:FREIT is subject to normal competition with other investors to acquire real property and to profitably manage such property. Numerous other REITs, banks, insurance companies and pension funds, as well as corporate and individual developers and owners of real estate, compete with FREIT in seeking properties for acquisition and for tenants. Many of these competitors have significantly greater financial resources than FREIT. In addition, retailers at FREIT's commercial properties face increasing competition from discount shopping centers, outlet malls, sales through catalogue offerings, discount shopping clubs, marketing and shopping through cable and computer sources, particularly over the internet, and telemarketing. In many markets, the trade areas of FREIT's commercial properties overlap with the trade areas of other shopping centers. Renovations and expansions at those competing shopping centers and malls could negatively affect FREIT's commercial properties by encouraging shoppers to make their purchases at such new, expanded or renovated shopping centers and malls. Increased competition through these various sources could adversely affect the viability of FREIT's tenants, and any new commercial real estate competition developed in the future could potentially have an adverse effect on the revenues of and earnings from FREIT's commercial properties.

FREIT also faces competition with respect to its residential properties based on a variety of factors, including perception by residential tenants of the safety, convenience and attractiveness of an apartment building or complex; the proximity and the number of competing shopping centers and apartment complexes; the availability of recreational and other amenities and the willingness and ability of the owner to provide capable management and adequate maintenance. Certain of these factors, such as the availability of amenities in the area surrounding a residential property, are not within FREIT’s control.

Illiquidity of real estate investment:Real estate investments are relatively difficult to buy and sell quickly. Accordingly, the ability of FREIT to vary its portfolio in response to changing economic, market or other conditions is limited. Also, FREIT’s interests in its partially owned subsidiaries are subject to transfer constraints by the operating agreements that govern FREIT’s investment in these partially owned subsidiaries.

Environmental problems may be costly:Both federal and state governments are concerned with the impact of real estate construction and development programs upon the environment. Environmental legislation affects the cost of selling real estate, the cost to develop real estate, and the risks associated with purchasing real estate.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, an owner of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at, on, in or under such property, as well as certain other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and penalties and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property). Such laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owners knew of, or were responsible for, the presence or disposal of such substances. Such liability may be imposed on the owner in connection with the activities of any operator of, or tenant at the property. The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal injury or property damages and the property owner's liability therefore could exceed the value of the property and/or the aggregate assets of the owner. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner's ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral. If FREIT incurred any such liability, it could reduce FREIT's revenues and ability to make distributions to its shareholders. In prior years, FREIT conducted environmental audits for all of its properties except for its undeveloped land and retail properties in Franklin Lakes (Franklin Crossing) and Glen Rock, New Jersey. Except for the Preakness Shopping center in Wayne, New Jersey which has been remediated by the seller, the environmental reports secured by FREIT have not revealed any environmental conditions on its properties which require remediation pursuant to any applicable federal or state law or regulations.

A property can also be negatively impacted by either physical contamination or by virtue of an adverse effect upon value attributable to the migration of hazardous or toxic substances, or other contaminants that have or may have emanated from other properties.

Qualification as a REIT:Since its inception in 1961, FREIT has elected to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and will continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT. In order to qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy a number of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Governmental legislation, new regulations, and

administrative interpretations may significantly change the tax laws with respect to the requirements for qualification as a REIT, or the federal income tax consequences of qualifying as a REIT. Although FREIT intends to continue to operate in a manner to allow it to qualify as a REIT, future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause it to revoke the REIT election or fail to qualify as a REIT. Such a revocation would subject FREIT’s income to federal income tax at regular corporate rates, and failure to qualify as a REIT would also eliminate the requirement that weFREIT pay dividends to ourits shareholders.

Change of investment and operating policies:FREIT’s investment and operating policies, including indebtedness and dividends, are exclusively determined by the Board, and not subject to shareholder approval.

None.

Portfolio of Investments:The following tables set forth certain information relating to each of FREIT's real estate investments in addition to the specific mortgages encumbering the properties. 

(1) FREIT owns a 40% equity interest in Westwood Hills. See "Investment in Subsidiaries".

(2) Pierre Towers is 100% owned by S And A Commercial Associates LP, which is 65% owned by FREIT.

(3) Construction completed in August 2006 on land acquired in 1963 / 1964.

(4) On November 19, 2013, the Hammel Gardens loanFREIT owns a 60% equity interest in Grande Rotunda, LLC.  A major redevelopment and expansion project was refinancedsubstantially completed in the amountthird quarter of $8.5 million at an interest rate of 4.54%.Fiscal 2016, in which a 379-unit residential complex was constructed upon property acquired in 2005.

(5) On November 19, 2013, the Steuben Arms loan was refinanced in the amount of $11.2 million at an interest rate of 4.54%.

(6) On December 29, 2014, FREIT Regency, LLC closed on a loan in the amount of $16.2 million bearing a floating interest rate equal to 125 basis points over the one-month BBA LIBOR and the loan will mature on December 15, 2024.LIBOR.  In order to minimize interest rate volatility during the term of the loan, FREIT Regency, LLC entered into an interest rate swap agreement that converted the floating interest rate to a fixed interest rate of 3.75% over the term of the loan.

(6) On December 9, 2013, Grande Rotunda, LLC closed with Wells Fargo Bank on a construction loan of up to $120 million to be used to redevelop and expand the Rotunda property in Baltimore, Maryland with a term of four (4) years, with one 12-month extension, at a rate of 225 basis points over the monthly LIBOR. As of October 31, 2016, approximately $114 million of this loan was drawn down (including approximately $21.1 million during Fiscal 2016), of which $19 million was used to pay off the loan from FREIT, and $95 million was used toward the construction at the Rotunda.  Approximately 58.9% of this outstanding loan balance was allocated to the residential segment based on proportionate percentages set forth in the construction loan agreement dated December 9, 2013.  (See Note 5 to FREIT’s consolidated financial statements.)

* Average annualized rent per sq. ft. includes the impact of straight-line rent escalations and the amortization of rent concessions and abatements.

(1) Security for draws against FREIT's Credit Line.

(2) The original 33,000 sq. ft. shopping center was replaced with a new 87,66987,661 sq. ft. center that opened in October 1997.

(3) FREIT owns a 100% interest in WestFREIT Corp, that owns the center.

(4) The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company and its affiliates, including Pathmark Stores, Inc. ("A&P"),&P filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code as disclosed in the bankruptcy filings.  On December 23, 2015, FREITfilings and Pathmark’s lease at FREIT’s Patchogue, New York property was notified by A&P that this lease would be rejected as of December 31, 2015.   See “Renewal of Leases and Reletting of Space” and “Results of Operations – Segment Information – Commercial Segment” under Item 7 for further information.  See also Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.

(5) FREIT owns a 40% equity interest in Wayne PSC, LLC, that owns the center.

(6) FREIT owns a 70% equity interest in Damascus Centre, LLC, that owns the center. A major renovation and expansion project was completed in November 1, 2011.

(7) FREIT owns a 60% equity interest in Grande Rotunda, LLC, that owns the center.

(8) Effective January 1, 2013,2016, the monthly debt service has been reduced to interest rate on loan was renegotiated to a fixed rate of 4.5%. All other terms of the loan remain unchanged.only.

(9) On December 26, 2012, Damascus Centre, LLC refinanced theits construction loan with along-term financing provided by People’s United Bank and the first tranche of the new mortgage loan was taken-down in the amount of $20 million, bearingmillion.  Based on leasing and net operating income at the shopping center, People’s United Bank agreed to a floating rate equal to 210 basis points overtake-down of the BBA LIBOR,second tranche of this loan on April 22, 2016 in the amount of $2,320,000, of which approximately $470,000 was readily available and the new loan will mature on January 3, 2023.remaining $1,850,000 is held in escrow and available to Damascus Centre, LLC once certain tenants open and begin paying rent.  In order to minimize interest rate volatility during the term of thethis loan, Damascus Centre, LLC entered into an interest rate swap agreement that, in effect, converted the floating interest rate to a fixed interest rate on each tranche of this loan, resulting in a fixed rate of 3.81% over the term of the first tranche of this loan and a fixed rate of 3.53% over the term of the second tranche of this loan.

(10) On December 9, 2013, Grande Rotunda, LLC closed with Wells Fargo Bank on a construction loan of up to $120 million construction loan to be used to reconfigureredevelop and expand itsthe Rotunda property in Baltimore, MD.Maryland with a term of four (4) years, with one 12-month extension, at a rate of 225 basis points over the monthly LIBOR. As of October 31, 2015,2016, approximately $92$114 million of this loan was drawn on the line,down (including approximately $21.1 million during Fiscal 2016), of which $19 million was used to pay off the loan from FREIT, and $73$95 million was used towardstoward the construction at the Rotunda.  Approximately 41.1% of this outstanding loan balance was allocated to the commercial segment based on proportionate percentages set forth in the construction loan agreement dated December 9, 2013.  (See Note 5 to FREIT’s consolidated financial statements.)

(11) Giant supermarket, which leased 55,330 sq. ft., elected not to extend their lease as of November 1, 2011. Effective April 2013, 40,000 sq. ft. of this space was leased to G-Mart. However, effective November 1, 2014, G-Mart notified FREIT that it had vacated its space at the Westridge Square shopping center and would be terminating its lease. A new lease for this 40,000 sq. ft. space was signed by H-Mart, an international grocery store chain, in November 2014 and subsequently H-Mart expanded its space by an additional 15,300 square feet.  H-Mart is currently renovating its space but began paying rent in May 2015.

(12) The Rotunda shopping center is currently undergoing aA major redevelopment and expansion project aswas substantially completed in the third quarter of Fiscal 2016, which included modernization of the office building containing 132,000 sq. ft. of office space and approximately 84,000 sq. ft. of retail space on the lower level of the building and an additional 75,000 square feet of new retail space.

(13) On September 29, 2016, Wayne PSC, LLC refinanced its $24.2 million mortgage loan held with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, with a result, approximately 71% is currently leasable space.new mortgage loan from People's United Bank in the amount of $25.8 million.  The new loan bears a floating interest rate equal to 220 basis points over the one-month BBA LIBOR with a maturity date of October 1, 2026.  In order to minimize the interest rate volatility during the term of the loan, Wayne PSC, LLC entered into an interest rate swap agreement that, in effect, converted the floating interest rate to a fixed interest rate of 3.625% over the term of the loan.  

Supplemental Segment Information:

Land Under Development and Vacant Land as of October 31, 2015:2016: