UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 20032004

 

¨    TRANSITIONTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission File Number: 0-14338


AUTODESK, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

94-2819853

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. employer

Identification No.)

 

111 McInnis Parkway,

San Rafael, California

 

94903

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (415) 507-5000


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class


 

Name of each exchange

on which registered


None

 

None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value

Preferred Share Rights (currently attached to and trading only with Common Stock)

(Title of Class)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx No¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.x¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yesx No¨

 

As of July 31, 2002,2003, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, there were approximately 112.5110.6 million shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding, and the aggregate market value of such shares held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (based on the closing sale price of such shares on the Nasdaq National Market on July 31, 2002)2003) was approximately $1.5$1.6 billion. Shares of the Registrant’s common stock held by each executive officer and director and by each entity that owns 5% or more of the Registrant’s outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

 

As of April 1, 2003,2004, Registrant had outstanding approximately 113.5117.5 million shares of common stock.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the Proxy Statement for Registrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held June 19, 200317, 2004 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K. The Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days of the Registrant’s fiscal year ended January 31, 2003.2004.



PART I

 

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

 

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that are subject to assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are discussed in this Annual Report, includingincluded under “Risk Factors Which May Impact Future Operating Results.” Actual results may vary from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. If our assumptions about the future do not materialize or prove to be incorrect, the results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. A forward-looking statement is any statement that looks to future events, including any statements regarding the markets for our products in the future or the success of our products in these markets, as well as any statements of expectation, plans, strategies and objectives of management for the future and any statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. We assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made.

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

 

GENERAL

 

Autodesk is one of the world’s leading design software and digital content companies, foroffering customers involvedprogressive business solutions through powerful technology products and services. We help customers in the building, manufacturing, infrastructure and digital media sectors increase the value of their digital design civil engineering, manufacturing, utilities, telecommunicationsdata and media and entertainment.improve efficiencies across their entire project lifecycle management processes. We provide a broad range of integrated and interoperable design software, Internet services, wireless development platforms and point-of-location applications that empower more than five millionmillions of users. Our software products are sold in over 160 countries, both directly to customers and through a network of resellers and distributors.

 

Our strategy is to deliver advanced solutions that address our customers’ needs to leverage the digital design data created with Autodesk design tools, so as to improve their productivity throughout the creation, building, manufacture and management of the customers’ projects. To execute against this strategy, we are focused on delivering strong products on a more frequent release cycle, strengthening our desktop position, migrating our customers to more advanced technologies, expanding in emerging geographies and capturing the lifecycle management market opportunity.

We are organized ininto two reportable operating segments: the Design Solutions Segment, which accounted for 84%85% of revenue in fiscal 2003,2004, and the Discreet Segment, which accounted for 16%15% of revenue in fiscal 2003.2004. A summary of our net revenues, and condensed results of operations for our business segments is found in Note 13, “Segments,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

The Design Solutions Segment derives revenues from the sale of design software products and services tofor professionals orand consumers who design, build, manage and own building projects or manufactured goods and from the sale of mapping and infrastructure management technologiesgeographic information systems technology to public and private users. The principal products sold by the Design Solutions Segment include AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT products, which accounted for 43%45% of our consolidated net revenues for fiscal 2003.2004. In addition to software products, the Design Solutions Segment offers a range of services including consulting, support and training. To date, revenues generated from these services have been insignificant. Approximately 75% of Design Solutions Segment revenue is derived from several countries including the United States (“U.S.”), Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, France, Canada and China. Additionally, sales of new seat licenses accounted for 72% of fiscal 2003 revenues and upgrades accounted for 18% of fiscal 2003 Design Solutions Segment revenues. In years when major new products are released, revenue from customers upgrading and from new seat licenses has increased.

 

The Design Solutions Segment consists of the following industry specific business divisions: Manufacturing Solutions Division; Infrastructure Solutions Division (formerly Geographic Information Services);Division; Building Solutions Division; and Platform Technology Division and Other, which includes revenue from our LocationAutodesk Collaboration Services Division and Autodesk Professional Services Division.Consulting. Autodesk Professional Services, a newly created separate division,Consulting provides integrated consulting, training and support for customers seeking maximum benefit and performance from our products. Our Location Services Division offers a technology platform designed to deliver location-based applications to wired, mobile and wireless users. We market our product, LocationLogic, to wireless carriers and network operators around the world.

2


 

The Discreet Segment develops, integrates, markets, sells and supports film and television compositing systems, High Definition (HD) and Standard Definition (SD) broadcast editorial and finishing systems, Digital Cinema production systems for color grading and film finishing, and animation, visualization and streaming media products. Revenues are derived from the sale of products to broadcasters, post production facilities, film studios, broadcasters and creative professionals for a variety of applications, including feature films, television programs, commercials, music and corporate videos, interactive game production, design visualization, Web design and interactive Web streaming. Similar

In addition to the Design Solutions Segment, in years when newcustomers served by our operating segments, our Location Services Division offers a technology platform designed to deliver location-based applications to wired, mobile and wireless users. We market our product, cycles occur, revenue from customers upgradingLocationLogic, to wireless carriers and new customer sales has resulted in increased revenue.network operators around the world.

 

During2


To support our business strategy, during the last three years, we completed the following significant acquisitions:acquisitions, among others: CAiCE Software Corporation (“CAiCE”) in September 2002, Revit Technology Corporation (“Revit”) in April 2002, the software division of Media 100, Inc. (“Media 100”) in October 2001 and Buzzsaw.com, Inc. (“Buzzsaw”) in JulyAugust 2001. For more information about the strategic importance of these acquisitions, refer to Item 7, Management’s“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.Operations”.

 

We were incorporated in California in April 1982 and were reincorporated in Delaware in May 1994. Our principal executive office is located at 111 McInnis Parkway, San Rafael, California 94903. Our telephone number is (415) 507-5000, and our Internet home page is located at www.autodesk.com; however, the information in, or that can be accessed through, our home page is not part of this Annual Report. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports are available, free of charge, on our Internet home page shortly after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.Commission (“SEC”). Investors may also obtain copies of our SEC filings from the SEC Website at www.sec.gov.

 

PRODUCTS

 

Design Solutions Segment

 

The principal product offerings from the different divisions of the Design Solutions Segment are described below:

 

Platform Technology Division and Other

 

The Platform Technology Division and Other accounted for 58%59% of the Design Solutions Segment revenues and 50% of overall net revenues in fiscal 2003.2004. The division’s principal product offerings include:

 

AutoCAD

 

AutoCAD, which is our flagship product, is a design and drafting platform that automates design tasks and provides digital tools that can be used independently and in conjunction with other specific applications in fields ranging from construction and manufacturing to process plant design and mapping. Architects, engineers, drafters and design-related professionals use AutoCAD to create, view, manage, plot, share, and reuse accurate, information-richinformation–rich drawings.

 

In March 2003,2004, we introduced a new release of AutoCAD. AutoCAD 2004 includes new features such as productivity tools2005 provides enhanced capabilities that allow users to better manage and presentation graphics, CAD standards toolspublish sheet sets and electronic documentation using DWF (Design Web Format) filescommunicate project information for easier data sharingmarkup and licensing tools for more efficient software management.review. Among other improvements, this release enhances the creation and management of entire sets of related drawings directly inside the application. This release follows the successful launch of AutoCAD 20022004 in June 2001,March 2003, which took advantage of previous product enhancements and also included streamlined standards management using a suite of new, intranet/Internet-enabledproductivity tools and presentation graphics, CAD standards management tools and enhanced team collaboration features.licensing tools for more efficient software management.

3


 

AutoCAD LT

 

AutoCAD LT is used for 2D drafting and detailing by design professionals in allmultiple industries who require full DWG file format compatibility and do not need to customize their software. Users can share, with security, all design data with team members who use AutoCAD or Autodesk products built on AutoCAD.

 

Autodesk Buzzsaw

 

Autodesk Buzzsaw, (formerly known asoffered by Autodesk ProjectPoint)Collaboration Services, is an online collaboration service that allows users to store, manage, and share project documents from any Internet connection. The Autodesk Buzzsaw online work environment integrates a secure project hosting service with CAD-related software, tools, and services. Users benefit from the ability to connect with their project team anytime, regardless of organizational or geographical boundaries. Autodesk Buzzsaw has recently become part of the Building Solutions Division, but for fiscal year 2003 was reported in the Platform Technology Division and Other.

Autodesk LocationLogic

LocationLogic provides wireless carriers with location services, including the ability to handle high location services transaction volume, support for real-time data communication, and support for a variety of end-user devices, including mobile phones, PDAs and laptop computers. LocationLogic aggregates, integrates and manages all information relevant to a user’s location and preferences and makes that information useful for real-life applications, such as “Find me the nearest...” or “Provide the fastest route...”

 

Manufacturing Solutions Division

 

The Manufacturing Solutions Division accounted for 17% of Design Solutions Segment revenues in fiscal 2003.2004. The division’s solutions enable our manufacturing customers to rapidly adopt 3D design, create designs in a simple 2D/3D

3


environment, manage design data for additional business processes, and share design data across the enterprise and with the supply chain. The division’s principal product offerings include:

 

Autodesk Inventor Series

 

Autodesk Inventor Series, which accounts for a significant portion of the Manufacturing Solution Division’s revenues, delivers Autodesk Mechanical Desktop, based on AutoCAD software, and Autodesk Inventor software, in one solution. Autodesk Inventor software is a 3D mechanical design creation tool that provides users an assembly-centric solid modeling (3D) and drawing production (2D) system together with adaptive design functionality. Users benefit from on-demand large assembly segment loading, adaptive design, layout and assembly functionality for solving function before form, built-in collaboration and design management tools and AutoCAD file compatibility.

 

AutoCAD Mechanical

 

AutoCAD Mechanical software offers 2D mechanical design and engineering tools that are seamlessly compatible with all AutoCAD-based applications.

 

Building Solutions Division

 

The Building Solutions Division accounted for 10% of Design Solutions Segment revenues in fiscal 2003.2004. The division’s solutions enable our building industry customers to create high quality designs and documentation, securely distribute digital design data, accurately estimate project costs, manage project workflow, and securely collaborate with project team and others who require access to design data. The division’s principal product offerings include:

 

Autodesk Architectural Desktop

 

Autodesk Architectural Desktop software supports the architectural design process from conceptual design to design development, through construction documentation. Autodesk Architectural Desktop features industry-

4


specificindustry-specific 2D production drafting functionality and integrated and accessible 3D design options and all the functionality from AutoCAD. Users benefit from simplified mass modeling, intelligent building components, style definitions and layer management according to industry standards.

 

Autodesk Revit

 

The Autodesk Revit platform a new product offering since our acquisition of Revit in April 2002, provides architects, design-build teams and other building industry professionals a complete architectural design and documentation system supporting all phases of design and all the architectural drawings and schedules required for a building project. Autodesk Revit collects information about the building project and coordinates this information across all other representations of the project so that every drawing sheet, 2D and 3D view, and schedule is based on information from the same underlying building database. The Autodesk Revit parametric change engine automatically coordinates changes made anywhere—in model views or drawing sheets, schedules, sections or plans.

 

Infrastructure Solutions Division

 

The Infrastructure Solutions Division accounted for 15%14% of Design Solutions Segment revenues in fiscal 2003.2004. The division’s solutions enable our infrastructure customers to compile, analyze, and maintain digital design information, manage physical infrastructure projects, and securely distribute information to remote locations. The division’s principal product offerings include:

 

Autodesk Map

 

Autodesk Map is the Autodesk solution for precision mapping and geographic information system analysis in the AutoCAD environment. It contains the complete AutoCAD toolset to enhance productivity, plus itand also offers specialized functionality for creating, maintaining and producing maps and geospatial data.

 

Autodesk Land Desktop

 

Autodesk Land Desktop is our GIS (geographic information system) land development design tool for the AutoCAD environment built around a centralized product structure that stores critical data—points, terrain models and alignments—in a

4


central location where they can be shared by team members. Users benefit from tools that create and label survey points, define and edit parcels and roadway alignments, automate drafting procedures, create terrain models and calculate volumes and contours.

 

Discreet Segment

 

The Discreet Segment’s solutions enable our digital media customers to extend digital content across the value chain, increase productivity and creativity, and distribute content across multiple mediums and formats. The principal product offerings from the Discreet Segment are discussed below:

 

3ds max

 

3ds max is a professional 3D modeling, animation and rendering software package providing advanced tools for character animation, next-generation game development, design visualization and visual effects production. Animators, designers and game developers benefit from the unified, object-oriented platform, customizable real-time interface, multiple-processor support and 3D graphics acceleration capabilities, as well as support for a wide range of plug-ins and specialized products such as Discreet’s character studio.

 

flame

 

flame, Discreet’s flagship on-line visual effects system, is a creative solution that allows artists to craft visual effects for feature films, television commercials, music videos and broadcast promos and IDs at the highest resolutions from film to HDhigh definition (HD) television. It offers the ability to interactively create, composite and edit the mosthighly challenging sequences that merge live action with computer-generated imagery, including new support in

5


version 8 for editing, 3D graphics and mixed resolutions. Post-production facilities and broadcasters integrate flame within dedicated suites and networked environments.

 

inferno

 

inferno, an on-line visual effects system, is a creative solution that builds on the featuresfeature set of flame with film tools, and increased image resolution and color control for digital film work, including film specific tools for grain management, wire and scratch removal and color calibration. It is tuned to provide the highesthigh levels of feedback on large format imagery and is designed specifically for film and HD content.

 

smoke

 

smoke is an on-line, non-linear creative editing and finishing solution that enables editors to edit, conform and finish television commercials, broadcast programming and other content. Editors benefit from support for HD and standard definition resolutions, which offers a provensecure investment for HD mastering, as well as the ability to work in a 3D environment, and compatibility with Discreet’s visual effects systems flame and inferno.

 

cleaner XLOther Products

cleaner XL is Discreet’s media mastering tool used to prepare digital media for delivery to DVD, CD-Rom, websites, PDAs and mobile phones. As mobile devices and DVD production proliferates, compressionists and editors benefit from a rich set of video and audio filters and encoding support for a wide range of popular formats including Windows Media, Quick Time, Real and MPEG 2 and 4.

 

combustion

combustion is a powerful, resolution-independent, vector paint, animation and compositing solution for multi-format work from the web to video and HDTV to feature film. combustion is available for both Apple® Mac OS® (OS 9.x, OS X v10.x) and Windows® (XP, NT, 2000) systems and features an advanced object-oriented architecture with extensive caching, multiple views and real-time loop playback. combustion is setting a new standard for interactive performance on the desktop.

Autodesk Subscription Program

 

In addition to sales of new software licenses and upgrades, we offer customers a subscription option. The Autodesk Subscription Program is available for a majority of our Design Solution products as well as Discreet’s 3ds max.max product. Under the program, members who own the most recent version of the underlying product participate in a simplified upgrade process, feature-enhancing extensions, downloadable e-Learning courses and optional on-line support. Users benefit from incremental and new releases of the underlying product releases and extensions.extensions over one year and multi-year contract periods.

Subscription program revenues are reported separately on our Consolidated Statements of Income as Maintenance revenue.

5


Autodesk LocationLogic

LocationLogic provides wireless carriers with location services, including the ability to handle high location services transaction volume, support for real-time data communication, and support for a variety of end-user devices, including mobile phones, PDAs and portable computers. LocationLogic aggregates, integrates and manages all information relevant to a user’s location and preferences and makes that information useful for real-life applications, such as “Find me the nearest...” or “Provide the fastest route...”

 

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND INTRODUCTION

 

We continue to enhance our product offerings and develop new products to meet changing customer demands. Research and development expenditures amounted to 21%represented 22% of fiscal 2004 net revenues, 23% of fiscal 2003 net revenues and 20% of fiscal 2002 net revenues. Our software is primarily developed internally, with occasional use of independent software developers. Additionally, we acquire products or technology developed by others by purchasing some or all of the assets or stock of the entity that held ownership rights to the technology.

The majority of our basic research and product development is performed in the U.S., and Canada, while translation and localization of foreign-market versions, as well as some product development, is performed by development teams or contractors in our local markets. We generally translate and localize our products into French, Italian, German, Spanish, Japanese and various Chinese dialects. Various aspectsPortions of our product-related functions,product development, including some software development, localization, quality assurance and technical publications, are performed in Canada, Europe and Asia.

 

The technology industry is characterized by rapid technological change in computer hardware, operating systems and software, as well as changes in customer requirements and preferences. To keep pace with these

6


changes, we maintain an aggressive program of new product development to address demands in the marketplace for increased connectivity and use of digital data created by our products. We dedicate considerable technical and financial resources to research and development to further enhance our existing products and to create new products and technologies. TheseHowever, these investments may not result in sufficient revenue generation to justify their costs or our competitors may introduce new products and services that achieve acceptance among our current customers, either of which would likely adversely affect our competitive position.

 

Our software products are complex and, despite extensive testing and quality control, may contain errors or defects. These defects or errors could result in corrective releases to our software products, damage to our reputation, loss of revenues, an increase in product returns or lack of market acceptance of our products, any of which would likely harm our business.

 

We actively recruit and hire experienced software developers and license and acquire complementary software technologies and businesses. In addition, we actively collaborate with and support independent software developers who offer products that enhance and complement our products.

 

Independent firms and contractors perform some of our product development activities, while other technologies are licensed from third parties. Licenses may restrict use of such technology in ways that negatively affect our business. We generally either own or license the software developed by third parties. Because talented development personnel are in high demand, independent developers, including those who currently develop products for us, may not be able or willing to provide development support to us in the future. Similarly, we may not be able to obtain and renew existing license agreements on favorable terms, if at all, and any failure to do so would likely harm our business.

 

Our business strategy has historically depended in part on our relationships with third-party developers, who provide products that expand the functionality of our software. Some developers may elect to support other products or may experience disruption in product development and delivery cycles or financial pressure during periods of economic downturn. In particular markets, this disruptionThese disruptions could negatively impact these third-party developers and, in turn, end users, which could harm our business.

 

MARKETING AND SALES

 

We sell our products and services both through authorized distributors and resellers and directly to customers, which includeprimarily large corporations, and through established distributors and resellers.corporations. Our customer-related operations are divided into three geographic regions, the Americas, EuropeEurope/Middle East/Africa and Asia/Pacific, and are supported by global marketing and sales organizations. These organizations develop and manage overall marketing and sales programs and work closely with a network of domestic and foreign offices.

 

6


We also work directly with reseller and distributor sales organizations, computer manufacturers, other software developers and peripheral manufacturers in cooperative advertising, promotions and trade-show presentations. We employ mass-marketing techniques such as web casts, seminars, telemarketing, direct mailings and advertising in business and trade journals. We have a worldwide user group organization dedicated to the exchange of information related to the use of our products.

 

Our ability to effectively distribute our products depends in part upon the financial and business condition of our distributor and reseller network.networks. Computer software dealers and distributors are typically not highly capitalized and have previously experienced difficulties during times of economic contraction such as current worldwide economic conditions, and may do so in the future. In addition,While we have processes to ensure that we assess the changing distribution models resulting from the Internet, from increased focus on directcreditworthiness of dealers and distributors prior to sales to major accounts or from two-tiered distribution may impact our reseller network in the future.them, if their financial condition were to deteriorate, they might not be able to make repeat purchases. While no single customer, distributor or reseller accounted for more than 10 percent10% of our consolidated net revenues in any of the past three fiscal years, the loss of, or a significant reduction in, business or failure to achieve anticipated levels of sell-through with any one of our major international distributors or large U.S. resellers could harm our business.

7


 

We intend to continue to make our products available in foreign languages. We believe that international sales will continue to becomprise a significant portion of our consolidated net revenues. We are in a time of significant political unrest and economic troubles. Continued economicEconomic weakness in any of the countries which contribute a significant portion of our net revenues would likely have a material adverse effect on our business. A summary of our financial information by geographic location is found in Note 13, “Segments” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

CUSTOMER AND RESELLER SUPPORT

 

Through our Autodesk Professional Services Division for Design Solutions products and through Discreet for its products, weWe provide technical support and training to customers through a leveraged model, augmented by programs designed to address specific direct needs. We expect that endEnd users rely primarily on their resellers and distributors for technical support.support; however, we do provide certain direct support for our high-end Discreet hardware systems. We support the resellers and distributors through technical product training, sales training classes, the Internet and direct telephone support. SupportWe also provide optional online support through our subscription program and support content is also available on the Product Support portion of our Internet site. There are also a number of user group forums in which customers are able to share information.

While we expect the resellers and distributors to provide the majority of technical support to our customers, we have developed programs to deliver direct support to some customers.

 

DEVELOPER PROGRAMS

 

One of our key strategies is to maintain an open-architecture design of our software products to facilitate third-party development of complementary products and industry-specific software solutions. This approach enables customers and third parties to customize our products for a wide variety of highly specific uses. We offer several programs that provide marketing, sales, technical support and programming tools to developers who develop add-on applications for our products.

 

BACKLOG

 

We typically ship products shortly after receipt of an order, which is common in the computer software industry. Accordingly,Our backlog is primarily comprised of deferred revenue from our subscription program, but also includes current software license product orders which have not yet shipped. The category of current software license product orders which we have not yet shipped consists of orders from customers with approved credit status for currently available license software products and may include both orders with current ship dates and orders with ship dates beyond the current fiscal period. We typically experience temporarily higher levels of this component of backlog for quarters in which we retire a release of AutoCAD, as we did in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. Aggregate backlog at January 31, 2004 and January 31, 2003 was approximately $159.2 million and $97.5 million, respectively. Although the backlog at the end of fiscal 2004 was higher than normal, we do not maintain a significant backlog. Moreover, thebelieve that backlog as of any particular date gives no indicationis indicative of actual sales for any succeeding period.future results.

 

COMPETITION

 

We compete with a variety of companies in different aspects of our business.

 

In our Design Solutions Segment, our primary global competitors include Dassault Systems and its SolidWorks subsidiary, Parametric Technology Corporation, UGS PLM Solutions, Bentley Systems and ESRI. In our Discreet Segment, our primary competitors include Avid Technology, Alias Systems (a division of Silicon Graphics, Inc.) and Apple Computer.

In addition, in each of our markets, there are numerous regional and specialized software and services companies, with which we compete.

7


The software industry has limited barriers to entry, and the availability of desktop computers with continually expanding performance capacity at progressively lower prices contributes to the ease of market entry. The marketsdesign software market in which we compete areparticular is fairly mature and characterized by vigorous competition;competition in each of the vertical markets in which we compete, both by entry of competitors with innovative technologies and by consolidation of companies with complementary products and technologies. In addition, the availability of third-party application software is a competitive factor within the CAD market. all of our markets.

Because of these and other factors, competitive conditions in these industries are likely to continue to intensify in the future. Increased competition could result in price reductions, reduced net revenues and profit margins and loss of market share, any of which could harm our business. Furthermore, some of our competitors have greater financial, technical, sales and marketing and other resources.

 

We believe that our future results depend largely upon our ability to offer new products and to continue to provide existing product offerings that compete favorably with respect to reliability, performance, ease of use, range of useful features, continuing product enhancements, reputation, price and training.

8


 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND LICENSES

 

We protect our intellectual property through a combination of patents, copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions. Nonetheless, our intellectual property rights may not be successfully asserted in the future or may be invalidated, circumvented or challenged. In addition, the laws of various foreign countries where our products are distributed do not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as U.S. laws. Our inability to protect our proprietary information could harm our business.

 

From time to time, we receive claims alleging infringement of a third party’s intellectual property rights, including patents. Litigation often becomes more likely in times of economic downturn.uncertainty. Disputes involving our intellectual property rights or those of another party have in the past and may in the future lead to, among other things, costly litigation or product shipment delays, which could harm our business.

 

We retain ownership of software we develop. All software is licensed to users and provided in object code pursuant to either shrink-wrap, embedded or on-line licenses, or executedsigned license agreements. These agreements contain restrictions on duplication, disclosure and transfer.

 

We believe that because of the limitations of laws protecting our intellectual property and the rapid, ongoing technological changes in both the computer hardware and software industries, we must rely principally upon software engineering and marketing skills to maintain and enhance our competitive market position.

 

While we have recovered some revenues resulting from the unauthorized use of our software products, we are unable to measure the extent to which piracy of our software products exists. We believe, however, that software piracy is and can be expected to be a persistent problem.

 

PRODUCTION AND SUPPLIERS

 

Production of our Design Solutions Segment and certain Discreet Segment software products involves duplication of the software media and the printing of user manuals. The purchase of media and the transfer of the software programs onto media for distribution to customers are performed by us and by licensed subcontractors. Media for our products include CD-ROMs and diskettes, which are available from multiple sources. User manuals for our products and packaging materials are produced to our specifications by outside sources. Production is generally performed in leased facilities operated by us. Some product assembly is also performed by independent third-party contractors. To date, we have not experienced any material difficulties or delays in the production of our software and documentation.

 

In addition, the Discreet segment has historically relied on third-party vendors for the supply of hardware components used in its systems. Many of the Discreet’s software products currently run on workstations manufactured by Silicon Graphics, Inc. (“SGI”). There are significant risks associated with this reliance on SGI and Discreet may be impacted by unforeseen difficulties associated with adapting theirits products to future SGI products and the timing of the development and release of SGI products.

 

EMPLOYEES

 

As of January 31, 2003,2004, we had 3,498 full-time equivalent employees.employed 3,493 people. None of our employees in the U.S.United States are represented by a labor union; however, in certain foreign countries, our employees are represented by worker councils. We have never experienced any work stoppages.stoppages and believe our employee relations are good.

 

Our8


Competition in recruiting personnel in the software industry, especially highly skilled engineers, is intense. We believe our continued growth and future success is highly dependent on theour continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled employees.

 

9


ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

 

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

We lease approximately 1,234,000 square feet of office space in 89 locations in the United States and internationally through our foreign subsidiaries. Our executive offices and the principal offices for domestic marketing, and sales and production are located in leased office space in northernSan Rafael California. Our San Rafael facilities consist of approximately 270,000 square feet under leases that have expiration dates ranging from 2004 to 2007. We alsoand our foreign subsidiaries lease additional space in various locations throughout the U.S.world for local sales, development and technical support personnel. Our foreign subsidiaries lease office space for their operations including local sales, product development and technical support personnel. During fiscal 20032005, as part of our restructuring plan, we closedexpect to consolidate several domestic and international offices in an effort to further reduce operating expense levels.

 

All facilities are in good condition and are operating at capacities averaging 75% occupancy worldwide. We believe that our existing facilities and offices are adequate to meet our requirements for the foreseeable future. See Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies,” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our lease commitments.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

On December 27, 2001, Spatial Corp. (“Spatial”) filed suit in Marin County Superior Court against Autodesk and one of our consultants, D-Cubed Ltd. (“D-Cubed”), seeking (1)among other things, termination of a declaration that (a) Autodesk had breached the ten year old development and license agreement between Spatial and Autodesk (“Development Agreement”) and (b) that Autodesk and D-Cubed had misappropriated the trade secrets of Spatial (2) an injunction preventing Autodesk from disclosing ACIS source code to D-Cubed and (3) an injunction preventing Autodesk from working with individuals who had previously workedcontractors under the agreement. On October 2, 2003, a jury found that Autodesk did not breach the agreement. The court ordered Spatial to pay Autodesh approximately $2.4 million for reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs of trial. Spatial filed a notice of appeal on ACIS source code for Spatial. ACIS is a geometric solid modeler upon which Autodesk ShapeManager is derived. Autodesk ShapeManager is incorporated into a number of Autodesk products, including Autodesk Inventor Series, AutoCAD based products and 3ds max.

After a hearing on January 23, 2002,December 2, 2003 appealing the Superior Court denied Spatial’s motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that Spatial had failed to establish that it was likely to prevail on the merits at trial. On August 1, 2002, Spatial amended its complaint to seek the following additional remedies: (1) a declaration regarding the appropriate locationdecision of the ACIS source codejury. The notice does not specify the basis on which Spatial intends to challenge the jury’s finding. We do not know of any basis on which an appeal would be successful, and (2) termination of Development Agreement, including our right to work with third party contractors on the ACIS source code and the perpetual right to incorporate and distribute ACIS with our products. On October 16, 2002, Spatial dismissed all of its claims for misappropriation of trade secrets against Autodesk and D-Cubed. On February 13, 2003, the Court granted D-Cubed Ltd.’s motion for summary judgment and denied our motion for summary adjudication of issues. We filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s ruling to be argued in May 2003. The case is now scheduled for trial in June 2003.

Weaccordingly, believe that Spatial’s claims are without merit, and we are contesting them vigorously. Although the results of litigation are inherently uncertain, we believe that the ultimate resolution of this matter will not have material effect on our consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, if Spatial were to prevail at trial on its request to terminate the perpetual license to ACIS, and we could not obtain a license on acceptable terms or license or develop a substitute technology, our business and operating results could be materially adversely affected. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 we recorded a $2.5 million reserve related to this matter.

On October 7, 2002, Digimation Inc. filed a demand for arbitration against Autodesk with the American Arbitration Association alleging breach of contract and interference with prospective economic advantage and business relations. The claims arise out of a November 1998 Preferred Publisher Agreement (the “PPA”) entered into with our Discreet division and relate to the marketing, publishing, development and support of software plug-ins for our 3ds max application. We have counter-claimed against Digimation for, among other things, Digimation’s failure to perform under the PPA. We believe that the ultimate resolution of this matter will not have a material effect on ourAutodesk’s consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of this matter could occur and materially affect our future results of operations, cash flows or financial position in a particular period.

 

Generally, weWe are involved in various legal proceedings from time to time arising from the normal course of business activities. In our opinion, resolution of thesepending matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or our financial position. However, depending on the amount and timing,it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of a matterone or more such proceedings could in the future materially affect our future results of operations, cash flows or financial position in a particular period.

 

10


ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

ITEM 4.SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003.2004.

 

Executive Officers of the RegistrantEXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

 

The following sets forth certain information as of January 31, 20032004 regarding our executive officers:

 

Name


  

Age



  

Position


Carol A. Bartz

  

54

55
  

Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President

Joseph H. Astroth

  

47

48
  

Executive Vice President, Location Services Division

Carl Bass

  

45

46
  

Senior Executive Vice President, Design Solutions Group

Jan Becker

  

49

50
  

Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Real Estate

Alfred J. Castino

  

50

51
  

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Paul Lypaczewski

  

45

46
  

Executive Vice President, Discreet Division

Marcia K. Sterling

  

59

60
  

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Michael E. Sutton

  

57

59
  

Executive Vice President, Business Operations

Tom Vadnais

55

Executive Vice President, Autodesk Professional Services

 

Carol A. Bartz joined Autodesk in April 1992 and serves as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President. Ms. Bartz is a director of Network Appliance, Inc., BEA Systems, Inc., and Cisco Systems, Inc., and the New York Stock Exchange. Prior to joining Autodesk, Ms.

9


Bartz held various positions at Sun Microsystems, Inc., including Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations from July 1990 through April 1992.

 

Joseph H. Astroth joined Autodesk in January 1996 and serves as Executive Vice President, Location Services Division. Previously, he was Executive Vice President, InfrastructureGIS Solutions Division from January 1996 to December 2000. From September 1989 through December 1995, Mr. Astroth held various positions with Graphic Data Systems Corporation including Director, Environmental Market Group, from January 1993 to June 1994, and Vice President of Product Management, Engineering, from June 1994 to December 1995.

 

Carl Bass joined Autodesk in September 1993 and serves as Senior Executive Vice President, Design Solutions Group. From August 2001 to February 2002, Mr. Bass served as Executive Vice President, Emerging Business and Chief Strategy Officer. From June 1999 to July 2001, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Buzzsaw.com, Inc., a spin-off from Autodesk. He has also held other executive positions within Autodesk. Prior to joining Autodesk, Mr. Bass was cofounder and Chief Technical Officeris a director of IthacaSerena Software, from May 1986 to August 1993.Inc.

 

Jan Beckerjoined Autodesk in September 1992 and has served as Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Real Estate since June 2000 and previously served in other capacities in the Human Resources Department.

 

Alfred J. Castinojoined Autodesk in August 2002 and serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Autodesk, Mr. Castino was Chief Financial Officer for Virage, Inc., a video and media communication software company from January 2000 to July 2002 and from August 1999 to January 2000 he served as Chief Financial Officer for RightPoint, Inc., an e-marketing company. Prior to this, Mr. Castino served as Vice President of Finance and then Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at PeopleSoft, Inc., an enterprise software company, where he worked from September 1997 to August 1999.

 

Paul Lypaczewski joined Autodesk in August 2000 as Executive Vice President, Discreet Division. Prior to joining Autodesk, Mr. Lypaczewski was Chief Operating Officer for Cyberwold, Inc., a multimedia software company, from October 1999 to August 2000 and from 1998 to October 1999 he served as President and CEO of TrueSpectra Inc., an image serving software company. From 1995 to 1998 he held various positions with Alias/Wavefront, a 3D graphics software company.

11


 

Marcia K. Sterling joined Autodesk in October 1995 and serves as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. From September 1982 to October 1995, she practiced corporate and securities law at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where she was a partner.

 

Michael E. Sutton joined Autodesk in October 1986 and serves as Executive Vice President, Business Operations. Previously, Mr. Sutton served as Executive Vice President, Worldwide Field Organization and in other capacities at Autodesk. From June 1993 through September 1998, Mr. Sutton served as Vice President, Europe/Europe, Middle East/Africa.

Tom Vadnaisjoined Autodesk in January 2002East and serves as Executive Vice President of Autodesk Professional Services. Prior to joining Autodesk, Mr. Vadnais was President and CEO of Mediaplex, Inc., a digital advertising and customer relationship management company, from April 2001 until Mediaplex was acquired by ValueClick, an internet advertising solutions company. During January 2002, and from May 1999 to January 2001, he served as President and COO of DPRC, a professional services company, until DPRC was acquired by Compuware Corporation, a software development company. Following the acquisition, Mr. Vadnais served as Executive Vice President, Professional Services of Compuware. Mr. Vadnais also served as President and COO of Tascor, Inc., from 1992 to 1999. Mr. Vadnais serves on the board of ValueClick, Inc.Africa.

 

There is no family relationship among any of our directors or executive officers.

 

12

10


PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

Our common stock is traded on The Nasdaq National Market under the symbol ADSK. The following table lists the high and low sales prices for each quarter in the last two fiscal years. These share prices were adjusted for the two-for-one stock split that was effective for record holders on April 4, 2002.

 

  

High


  

Low


Fiscal 2003

      
  High

  Low

Fiscal 2004

      

First Quarter

  

$

23.19

  

$

17.21

  $16.53  $13.29

Second Quarter

  

$

18.28

  

$

10.96

  $16.99  $14.11

Third Quarter

  

$

13.92

  

$

10.85

  $19.50  $14.75

Fourth Quarter

  

$

15.95

  

$

12.48

  $26.55  $19.40

 

  

High


  

Low


Fiscal 2002

      
  High

  Low

Fiscal 2003

      

First Quarter

  

$

19.72

  

$

12.59

  $23.19  $17.21

Second Quarter

  

$

19.40

  

$

15.27

  $18.28  $10.96

Third Quarter

  

$

19.42

  

$

14.80

  $13.92  $10.85

Fourth Quarter

  

$

20.79

  

$

16.59

  $15.95  $12.48

 

Dividends

 

Adjusted for a stock split in April 2002, we paid quarterly dividends of $0.03 per share in fiscal 20032004 and 20022003 to Autodesk stockholders. We currently intend to continue paying regular cash dividends on a quarterly basis.

 

Stockholders

 

As of January 31, 20032004 the number of common stockholders of record was 857.767. Because many of our shares of common stock are held by brokers or other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by the record holders.

 

13


ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The financial data for the years ended January 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002 are derived from, and are qualified by reference to, the audited consolidated financial statements and are included in this Form 10-K. The financial data for the years ended January 31, 20002001 and 19992000 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements which are not included in this Form 10-K.

 

  

Fiscal year ended January 31,


  Fiscal year ended January 31,

  

2003


  

2002


  

2001


  

2000


  

1999


  2004

  2003

  2002

  2001

  2000

  

(In thousands, except per share data)

  (In thousands, except per share data)

For the Fiscal Year

                              

Net revenues

  

$

824,945

  

$

947,491

  

$

936,324

  

$

848,051

  

$

893,832

  $951,643  $824,945  $947,491  $936,324  $848,051

Income from operations(1)

  

 

24,962

  

 

98,174

  

 

140,014

  

 

763

  

 

142,087

Net income(1)(2)(3)

  

 

31,904

  

 

90,313

  

 

93,233

  

 

9,808

  

 

97,132

Income from operations(1)

   106,237   24,962   98,174   140,014   763

Net income(1)(2)(3)

   120,316   31,904   90,313   93,233   9,808

At Year End

                              

Total assets

  

$

883,650

  

$

902,444

  

$

807,759

  

$

902,946

  

$

819,927

Total Assets

  $1,017,160  $883,650  $902,444  $807,759  $902,946

Long-term liabilities

  

 

4,414

  

 

2,479

  

 

1,208

  

 

1,255

  

 

3,486

   10,595   4,414   2,479   1,208   1,255

Common stock data

                              

Basic net income per share

  

$

0.28

  

$

0.83

  

$

0.82

  

$

0.08

  

$

0.86

  $1.08  $0.28  $0.83  $0.82  $0.08

Diluted net income per share

  

 

0.28

  

 

0.80

  

 

0.80

  

 

0.08

  

 

0.82

   1.04   0.28   0.80   0.80   0.08

Dividends paid per share

  

 

0.12

  

 

0.12

  

 

0.12

  

 

0.12

  

 

0.10

   0.12   0.12   0.12   0.12   0.12


(1)Fiscal 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2000 results were impacted by restructuring and other charges. See Note 11, Restructuring“Restructuring and Other, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

11


(2)Fiscal 2004 and 2003 results were impacted by non-recurring tax benefits of $26.7 million and $3.8 million, respectively. See Note 4, “Income Taxes,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion. Fiscal 2002 results were also impacted by a one-time non-cash gain of $9.5 million related to the dissolution of an affiliate.

(3)Fiscal 20032002, 2001 and 2000 results were also impacted by a non-recurring tax benefitgoodwill amortization charges of $3.8 million.$19.9 million, $24.3 million and $24.4 million, respectively. See Note 4, Income Taxes,1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
(3)Fiscal 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999 results were also impacted by goodwill amortization charges of $19.9 million, $24.3 million, $24.4 million and $25.1 million, respectively. See Note 1, Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

 

14

12


ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The discussion in “Management’sWe begin Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”Operations (“MD&A”) with our overall strategy and the strategy for our major business units to give the reader an overview of the goals of our business and the direction in which our business and products are moving. This is followed by a discussion of the Critical Accounting Policies that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results. In the next section, beginning on page 18, we discuss our Results of Operations for fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003 and for fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002, beginning with an Overview. We then provide an analysis of changes in our balance sheet and cash flows, and discuss our financial commitments in the sections entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” “Contractual Obligations” and “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.”

The MD&A should be read in conjunction with the other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Item 1: Business,” Item 6: “Selected Financial Data,” and Item 8: “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

The discussion in our MD&A contains trend analyses and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements consist of, among other things, statements regarding net revenues, revenue mix, costs and expenses, gross margins, allowance for bad debts, level of product returns, gross margins, costsrestructuring activity and expenses, legal contingenciesshort-term and restructuring activity,long-term cash requirements, as well as statements involving trend analyses and statements including such words as “we believe” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are subject to business and economic risks. As such, our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth elsewhere herein, includingbelow, included in “Risk Factors Which May Impact Future Operating Results.”Results” and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

STRATEGY

Our goal is to be the world’s leading design software and digital content company, offering customers progressive business solutions through powerful technology products and services. Our focus is to help customers in the building, manufacturing, infrastructure and digital media sectors increase the value of their digital design data and improve efficiencies across the entire lifecycle management processes.

We believe that our ability to make technology available to mainstream markets is one of our competitive advantages. By innovating in existing technology categories, we bring powerful design products to volume markets. Our architecture allows for extensibility and integration. Our products are designed to be easy to learn and use, and to provide customers low cost of deployment, low total cost of ownership and a rapid return on investment.

We have created a large global community of resellers, third party developers and customers allowing us broad reach into volume markets. Our reseller network is extensive, and provides our customers with resources for the purchase, support and training of our products globally in an effective and cost efficient manner. We have a significant number of registered third party developers, creating products that run on top of our products, further extending our reach into volume markets. Our installed base of millions of users has made Autodesk products a worldwide design software standard. Users trained on Autodesk products are broadly available both from universities and the existing work force, reducing the cost of training for our customers.

Our growth strategy derives from these core strengths. We continue to increase the business value of our desktop design tools for our customers in a number of ways. We improve the performance and functionality of existing products with each new release. Beyond our general design products, we develop products addressing specific vertical market needs. In addition, we believe that migration from our 2D products to our 3D products presents a significant growth opportunity. While the rate of migration to 3D varies from industry to industry, adoption of 3D design software should increase the productivity of our customers. However, this migration also poses various risks to us. In particular, if we do not successfully convert our 2D customer base to our 3D products, then sales of our 2D products may decrease without a corresponding conversion of customer seats to 3D products, which would harm our business.

Additionally, we are creating products to address our customers’ needs for better design information management tools, also known as lifecycle management. We believe that for each author of design information, there are 5 to 10 users of that information, whom we call downstream users. We are developing and introducing products that will allow downstream users, both within and external to our customer enterprises, to manage and share their designs. Our large installed base provides a unique opportunity to grow from design and engineering departments to adjacent departments and into the supply chain.

Expanding our geographic coverage is a key element of our growth strategy. We believe that the rapidly growing economies in China and Eastern Europe present significant growth opportunities for the company. In support of our growth efforts in China, we opened our China Application Development Center during fiscal 2004. With a level of understanding of

13


local markets that could not be obtained from remote operations, the Center will develop products to specifically address the Chinese market. In addition, we believe that our products will have a competitive advantage as a result of being engineered locally. Our ability to conduct research and development at various locations throughout the world allows us to optimize product development and lower costs. International development, however, involves significant costs and challenges, including whether we can adequately protect our intellectual property and derive significant revenue in areas where software piracy is a substantial problem.

A significant part of our growth strategy is based upon improving the installed base business model. A key element of this change is our current plan to release major products on at least an annual basis. Strong annual release cycles have a number of benefits. In particular, it permits us to deliver key performance and functionality improvements to the customer on a regular and timely basis. Annual releases also drive annual product retirement programs, thereby reducing the volatility of revenues we have experienced in the past, as both the release of the new version and retirement of the oldest supported version happen annually. Volatility may also be reduced through the Autodesk Subscription Program, as revenue is recognized ratably over the subscription contract period.

We are continually focused on improving productivity and efficiency in all areas of the company. Doing so will allow us to increase our investment in growth initiatives. During fiscal 2004, we conducted a rigorous study of our cost structure. Through the services of a top consulting firm, we benchmarked Autodesk metrics against averages of other companies as well as other leading software companies. As a result of the study, we are implementing efficiency initiatives throughout the company. Each division has short term and long term efficiency targets.

We believe that increases in our efficiency and productivity will allow us to increase investment in our growth initiatives while improving our profitability. We are committed to achieving annual operating margins in the 18% to 20% target range by fiscal year 2006. This goal is based upon current generally accepted accounting principles and makes no attempt to consider the effect of future changes to those principles, including the potential expensing of stock options which would have a material adverse effect on our operating margins. Longer term, we will continue to balance operating margin targets with revenue growth opportunities.

Autodesk generates significant cash flow. Our uses of cash include a $0.03 per share quarterly dividend, share repurchases to offset the dilutive impact of our employee stock plans, mergers and acquisitions, and investments in growth initiatives. We continually evaluate merger and acquisition and divestiture opportunities to the extent they support our strategy. Our typical acquisitions provide adjacency to our current products and services, specific technology or expertise and quick

14


product integration. Additionally, we continue to invest internally in growth initiatives including lifecycle management and Autodesk Location Services.

Design Solutions Segment

The Design Solutions Segment consists of the following industry specific divisions: Manufacturing Solutions Division, Infrastructure Solutions Division, Building Solutions Division and Platform Technology Division and Other, which includes our Autodesk Consulting and Autodesk Collaboration Services.

For the Manufacturing Solutions Division, our focus is to enable our customers to rapidly adopt 3D design, create designs in a simple 2D/3D environment, manage design data for additional business processes and share design data across the enterprise with the supply chain. Our primary solution offering is the Autodesk Inventor Series, which delivers Autodesk Mechanical Desktop, based on AutoCAD software, and Autodesk Inventor, a 3D mechanical design software with built in collaboration and design management tools, in one solution.

For the Infrastructure Solutions Division, our focus is to enable our customers to compile, analyze and maintain digital design information, manage physical infrastructure projects and securely distribute information to remote locations. Our primary offerings are Autodesk Map for precision mapping and geographic information system analysis in the AutoCAD environment and Autodesk Land Desktop, our land development design tool for the AutoCAD environment.

For the Building Solutions Division, our focus is to enable our customers to create high quality designs and documentation, securely distribute digital design data, accurately estimate project costs, manage project workflow and securely collaborate with project team and downstream users. Our primary offerings are Autodesk Architectural Desktop, based on AutoCAD software, and Autodesk Revit, a platform providing a complete architectural design and documentation platform supporting all phases of design and all the architectural drawings and schedules required for a building project.

For the Platform Technology Division our focus is on providing CAD design tools and technologies that allow our customers in multiple markets to create, manage, and share design data. Our primary offerings are AutoCAD, AutoCAD LT and Autodesk Buzzsaw.

Discreet Segment

The Discreet Segment serves the digital media sector. Our strategy is to provide powerful and sophisticated solutions that enable our customers to extend the use of digital content, increase their creative capability, increase their productivity and enable content distribution across multiple media and formats. Our primary offerings include visual effects solutions, editing and color grading solutions, 3D animation for next generation games development, design visualization solutions and media mastering and streaming solutions.

Location Services Division

For the Locations Services Division focus is on providing a technology platform designed to deliver location-based applications to wired, mobile and wireless users. Our primary offering is LocationLogic.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, net revenues, costs and expenses and related disclosures. We regularly evaluatere-evaluate our estimates and assumptions. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

We believe that of our significant accounting policies, which are described in Note 1, in the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,Statements”, the following policies involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity. Accordingly, these are the policies we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Revenue Recognition. Our accounting policies and practices are in compliance with Statement of Position 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.”

 

We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibilitycollection is probable. However, determining whether and when some of these

15


criteria have been satisfied often involves assumptions and judgments that can have a significant impact on the timing and amount of revenue we report.

 

BasedFor multiple element arrangements that include software products, we allocate and defer revenue for the undelivered elements based on their vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value, which is the price charged when that element is sold separately or the price as set by management with the relevant authority. We are required to exercise judgment in determining whether VSOE exists for each undelivered element based on whether our pricing for these elements is sufficiently consistent.

Our assessment of likelihood of collection is also a critical element in determining the sale istiming of revenue recognition.

Our product or service related, we recognize revenue as follows. Product sales to distributors and resellers are generally recognized at the time of shipment as long astitle to our product passes to the distributor or reseller, provided all other criteria for revenue recognition are met. This policy is predicated on our ability to estimate sales returns. We are also required to evaluate whether our distributors and resellers have been met. Subscription, customer supportthe ability to honor their commitment to make fixed and determinable payments, regardless of whether they collect cash from their customers. If we were to change any of these assumptions or judgments, it could cause a material increase or decrease in the amount of revenue that we report in a particular period.

In addition to product sales, Autodesk recognizes maintenance revenues from our subscription program and hosted service revenues are recognized ratably over the contract periods. Customer consulting and training revenues are recognized as the services are performed.

 

Allowance for Bad Debts. We maintain allowances for doubtful accountsbad debts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. At January 31, 2003, we had aOur bad debt reserve ofwas $9.7 million and $9.2 million.million at January 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

Estimated reserves are determined based upon historical loss patterns, the number of days that billings are past due and an evaluation of the potential risk of loss associated with specific problem accounts. The use of different estimates or assumptions could produce different allowance balances. While we believe our existing reserve for doubtful accounts is adequate and proper,appropriate, additional reserves may be required should the financial condition of our customers deteriorate or as unusual circumstances arise.

 

Product ReturnReturns and Price Adjustment Reserves. With the exception of contracts with certain distributors, our sales contracts do not contain specific product-return privileges. However, we permit our distributors and resellers to return product in certain instances, generally when new product releases supercede older versions. At January 31, 2004 and 2003, we had aour product returns reserve ofreserves were $20.6 million and $19.8 million.

15


In the past three years, productmillion, respectively. Product returns as a percentage of applicable revenues have beenwere 5.4% in the range offiscal 2004, 5.5% in fiscal 2003 and 6.0% in fiscal 2002.

For certain distributors in Europe, we offer incremental discounts, or price adjustments, ranging from less than 1% to 4% to 7% annually. During fiscal year, for certain qualifying sales. At January 31, 2004 and 2003, product returnsour price adjustment reserves were $4.2 million and $4.1 million, respectively. Price adjustment claims as a percentage of applicable revenue was 6%. revenues were 3.1% in fiscal 2004, 2.0% in fiscal 2003 and 0.3% in fiscal 2002.

The product returnreturns and price adjustment reserves are based on estimated channel inventory levels, the timing of new product introductions, channel sell-in for applicable markets, historical experience of actual product returns and price adjustment rates and other factors. The greater the channel inventory level or the closer the proximity of a major new product release such as AutoCAD 2004, the more product returns we expect. Similarly, the higher the applicable channel sell-in or the higher the channel inventory level, the more price adjustment claims we expect. During fiscal year 2003,2004, we recorded a reserve for product returns of $33.3$39.3 million and a reserve for price adjustments of $5.9 million, both of which reduced our gross sales.revenue.

 

While we believe our accounting practice for establishing and monitoring product returns and price adjustment reserves is adequate and proper,appropriate, any adverse activity or unusual circumstances could result in an increase in reserve levels in the period in which such determinations are made.

 

Realizability of Long-Lived Assets. We reviewassess the realizability of our long-lived assets and related intangible assets annually during the fourth fiscal quarter, or sooner whenevershould events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying values of such assets may not be recoverable. We consider some of the following factors important in decidingdetermining when to perform an impairment review: significant under-performance of a business or product line relative to budget; shifts in business strategies which impact the continued uses of the assets; significant negative industry or economic trends; and the results of past impairment reviews.

 

16


In assessing the recoverability of these long-lived assets, we first determine their fair values, which are based on assumptions regarding the estimated future cash flows that could reasonably be generated by these assets. When assessing long-lived assets, we use undiscounted cash flow models.models which include assumptions regarding projected cash flows and discount rates. Variances in these assumptions could have a significant impact on our conclusion as to whether an asset is impaired or the amount of the impairment charge. Impairment charges, if any, result in situations whenwhere the fair values of these assets are less than their carrying values. During fiscal 2004, we recognized an impairment charge of $1.8 million related to technology acquired as part of the software division of Media 100, Inc. (See Note 10, “Business Combinations”, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion).

 

In addition to our recoverability assessments, we routinely review the remaining estimated useful lives of our long-lived assets. Any reduction in the useful life assumption will result in increased depreciation and amortization expense in the quarter when such determinations are made, as well as in subsequent quarters. This situation occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 resulting in additional amortization expense of $0.3 million.

 

We will continue to evaluate the values of our long-lived assets in accordance with applicable accounting rules. As changes in business conditions and our assumptions occur, we may be required to record impairment charges.

 

Goodwill. On February 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.Assets.” Therefore, we no longer amortize goodwill. We test goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or sooner whenevershould events or changes in circumstances indicate potential impairment. As changes in business conditions and our assumptions occur, we may be required to record impairment charges.

 

Deferred Tax Assets. We currently have $27.2$17.6 million of net deferred tax assets, mostly arising from net operating losses, tax credits, reserves and timing differences for purchased technologies and capitalized software offset by the establishment of U.S.US deferred tax liabilities on unremitted earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries. We perform a quarterly assessment of the recoverability of these net deferred tax assets, which is principally dependent upon our achievement of projected future taxable income of approximately $70.0$46.0 million in specific geographies. Our judgments regarding future profitability may change due to future market conditions and other factors. These changes, if any, may require possible material adjustments to these net deferred tax assets, resulting in a reduction in net income in the period when such determinations are made.

 

Restructuring Expenses Associated with Office Closures.Expenses. In November 2003, the Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan that involves the elimination of between 550 and 650 positions and the closure of a number of offices worldwide. This plan is designed to further reduce operating expense levels to help achieve our targeted operating margins as well as redirect resources to product development, sales development and other critical areas. The restructuring charge under this plan is estimated to be up to $37.0 million and is expected to be substantially complete by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2005.

During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003,2004, we recorded gross restructuring charges of $25.9$4.9 million of which $12.5$3.6 million related to the elimination of positions in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 under the fiscal 2004 restructuring plan, $0.2 million related to the closure of several domestica facility under the fiscal 2004 restructuring plan and international offices. These$1.1 million related to the office closures effected during previous years. The office closure costs were based upon the projected rental payments through the remaining terms of the underlying operating leases, offset by projected subleasingsublease income. The projected

16


subleasing sublease income amounts were calculated by using information provided by third-party real estate brokers andas well as management judgments and were based on assumptions for each of the real estate markets where the leased offices were located. Should real estate markets worsen and we are not able to sublease the properties as expected, we will record additional expenses in the period when such determinationsrental payments are made. This situation occurred during fiscal 2002, and 2003 and 2004; we therefore recorded additional charges as a result of the inability to sublease abandoned offices. If the real estate markets subsequently improve, and we are able to sublease the properties earlier or at more favorable rates than projected, we will reverse somea portion of the underlying restructuring accruals, which will result in increased net income in the period when such determinations are made.sublease becomes effective.

 

Legal Contingencies. As described in Item 3. Legal Proceedings3, “Legal Proceedings” and Note 7, Commitments“Commitments and Contingencies,Contingencies”, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we are periodically involved in various legal claims and proceedings. We routinely review the status of each significant matter and assess our potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any matter is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we record a liability for the estimated loss. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 we recorded a $2.5 million reserve related to the Spatial matter. Because of inherent uncertainties related to these legal matters, we base our loss reserves on the best information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, we reassess our potential liability and may revise our estimates. Such revisions could have a material impact on future quarterly results of operations.

 

Stock Option Accounting. We do not record compensation expense when stock option grants are awarded to employees at exercise prices equal to the fair market value of Autodesk common stock on the date of grant.

 

Had we recorded compensation expense, our net income would have been substantially less. In addition, if we are required to record compensation expense, our ability to achieve our target operating margins will be adversely affected. The impact of

17


expensing employee stock awards is further described in Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

During November 2002,In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” FIN 46 expands upon existing accounting guidance that addresses when a company should include in its financial statements the assets, liabilities and activities of another entity. A variable interest entity is a corporation, partnership, trust or any other legal structure used for business purposes that either (a) does not have equity investors with voting rights or (b) has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities. FIN 46 requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity’s activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns or both. The consolidation requirements of FIN 46 apply immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The consolidation requirements apply to older entities in the first fiscal year or interim period ending after December 15, 2003. Disclosure requirements apply to any financial statements issued after January 31, 2003. The adoption of this statement had no effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards BoardNo. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34” (“FIN 45”SFAS 149”). FIN 45 elaborates onSFAS 149 amends and clarifies the existing disclosure requirementsaccounting for a guarantorderivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in its interimother contracts, and annual financial statements about its obligationsfor hedging activities under guarantees issued. It also clarifies that at the time a guaranteeStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS 149 is issued, the guarantor must recognize an initial liabilitygenerally effective for the fair value of the obligations it assumes under the guarantee and must disclose that information in its financial statements. The initial recognition and measurement provisions apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issuedcontracts entered into or modified after DecemberJune 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. Adoption of SFAS 149 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity” (“SFAS 150”) which requires that certain financial instruments, which under previous guidance were accounted for as equity, must now be accounted for as liabilities. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2002,2003, and otherwise was effective at the disclosure requirements apply to guarantees outstanding as of December 31, 2002. We adopted the provisions of FIN 45 effective January 31, 2003. Somebeginning of the software licenses we grant contain provisions that indemnify licenseesfirst interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of this statement had no effect on our software from damages and costs resulting from claims alleging that our software infringes the intellectual property rightsconsolidated financial position, results of a third party. We have historically received only a limited number of requests for indemnification under these provisions and have not been required to make material payments pursuant to these provisions. Accordingly, we have not recorded a liability related to these indemnification provisions.operations or cash flows.

 

Overview of Fiscal 20032004 Results of Operations

(in thousands)

(in thousands)  For the year ended
January 31, 2004


  As a % of Net
Revenues


  For the year ended
January 31, 2003


  As a % of Net
Revenues


 

Net Revenues

  $951,643  100% $824,945  100%

Cost of revenues

   148,128  16%  145,810  18%

Operating expenses excluding amortization of purchased intangibles and restructuring and other charges

   693,573  73%  627,987  76%

Amortization of purchased intangibles

   522  —     299  —   

Restructuring and other

   3,183  —     25,887  3%
   

     

    

Income from Operations

  $106,237  11% $24,962  3%

 

     

For the year ended January 31, 2003


    

As a % of Net Revenues


     

For the year ended January 31, 2002


    

As a % of Net Revenues


 

Net Revenues

    

$

824,945

    

100

%

    

$

947,491

    

100

%

     

          

      

Cost of revenues

    

 

140,162

    

17

%

    

 

151,203

    

16

%

Operating expenses

    

 

633,635

    

77

%

    

 

643,581

    

68

%

Amortization of goodwill and

    purchased intangibles

    

 

299

    

 

    

 

20,903

    

2

%

Restructuring and other

    

 

25,887

    

3

%

    

 

33,630

    

4

%

     

          

      

Income from Operations

    

$

24,962

    

3

%

    

$

98,174

    

10

%

For fiscal 2004 our primary goals were to deliver a series of market-leading products and solutions to our customers to drive revenue growth, while increasing our operating efficiency to move our business model toward our long-term operating margin objectives. We made considerable progress towards our goals. Our fiscal 2004 product releases offered continued advancements in design and authoring productivity as well as project lifecycle management capability.

17


 

Our fiscal 2003 net revenues were down 13 percent15% higher in fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003 primarily due to strong upgrade and subscription revenues coupled with the positive effects of changes in foreign currencies, principally driven by the strength of the euro. Upgrade revenues, equally driven by price increases and volume growth, increased 88% from the prior year due to the strength of our product releases and to the announcement of our intention to retire the AutoCAD 2000-based product series during early calendar 2004. In addition, our AutoCAD-based product installed base grew to nearly 3.4 million at the end of fiscal 2004. Subscription revenues increased 51% from the prior year as our subscription program, now available to most customers in most major markets worldwide, continues to attract new customers with new enhancements such as Web support direct from Autodesk, e-learning and multi-year contracts.

18


We generate a significant amount of our revenue in the United States, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, China and Canada. The weaker value of the U.S. dollar, relative to international currencies, had a positive impact of $34.3 million on operating results in fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003. Had exchange rates from fiscal 2003 been in effect during fiscal 2004, translated international revenue billed in local currencies would have been $57.8 million lower and operating expenses would have been $23.5 million lower.

Our operating expenses, excluding amortization of purchased intangibles and restructuring and other, for fiscal 2004 increased $65.6 million but declined as a percentage of revenue as compared to fiscal 2003. The increase is due primarily to higher commission and bonus costs based on current financial performance as well as higher marketing costs. Our operating margins are very sensitive to changes in revenues, given the relatively fixed nature of most of our operating expenses, which consist primarily of employee-related expenditures, facilities costs and depreciation and amortization expense. In future periods, employee-related expenditures would likely increase if we are required to expense employee stock option grants.

During the second and third quarters of fiscal 2004, with the help of a major consulting firm, we analyzed our operations and cost structure. We identified a number of opportunities to help achieve our targeted operating margins as well as redirect investments to the most promising growth areas, such as product lifecycle management and development of our China sales and development infrastructure. As we executed on these plans, we began to incur restructuring charges beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. We expect to incur additional charges through the third quarter of fiscal 2005.

Throughout fiscal 2004, we maintained a strong balance sheet and generated $220.1 million of cash from our operating activities as compared to $85.6 million in the previous year. We finished the year with $529.5 million in cash and marketable securities, a higher deferred revenue balance and an improved days sales outstanding position as compared to the previous year. Approximately 65% of the deferred revenues balance at January 31, 2004 consisted of customer subscription contracts which will be recognized as revenue ratably over the life of the contracts, which is generally one year.

Results of Operations

Net Revenues

(in millions)     

Increase

(decrease)

compared to

prior

fiscal year


     

Increase

(decrease)

compared to

prior

fiscal year


   
   Fiscal 2004

  $

  percent

  Fiscal 2003

  $

  percent

  Fiscal 2002

Net Revenues:

                         

License and Other

  $836.7  $87.8  12% $748.9  ($152.9) (17%) $901.8

Maintenance

   114.9   38.9  51%  76.0  30.3  66%  45.7
   

  


    

  

    

   $951.6  $126.7  15% $824.9  ($122.6) (13%) $947.5
   

  


    

  

    

Net Revenues by Geographic Area:

                         

Americas

  $409.6  $35.4  9% $374.2  ($59.5) (14%) $433.7

Europe, Middle East and Africa

   337.2   73.8  28%  263.4  (27.4) (9%)  290.8

Asia Pacific

   204.8   17.5  9%  187.3  (35.7) (16%)  223.0
   

  


    

  

    

   $951.6  $126.7  15% $824.9  ($122.6) (13%) $947.5
   

  


    

  

    

Net Revenues by Operating Segment:

                         

Design Solutions

  $811.7  $117.3  17% $694.4  ($95.8) (12%) $790.2

Discreet

   139.6   11.1  9%  128.5  (27.6) (18%)  156.1

Other

   0.3   (1.7) (85%)  2.0  0.8  67%  1.2
   

  


    

  

    

   $951.6  $126.7  15% $824.9  ($122.6) (13%) $947.5
   

  


    

  

    

Net Design Solutions Revenues:

                         

Manufacturing Solutions Division

  $139.5  $20.7  17% $118.8  ($11.4) (9%) $130.2

Infrastructure Solutions Division

   115.2   11.8  11%  103.4  (13.0) (11%)  116.4

Building Solutions Division

   80.3   6.8  9%  73.5  (9.4) (11%)  82.9

Platform Technology Division and Other

   476.7   78.0  20%  398.7  (62.0) (13%)  460.7
   

  


    

  

    

   $811.7  $117.3  17% $694.4  ($95.8) (12%) $790.2
   

  


    

  

    

19


Fiscal 2004 Net Revenues Compared to Fiscal 2003 Net Revenues

Net revenues increased to $951.6 million in fiscal 2004 from $824.9 million in fiscal 2003. Net revenues increased in all three geographic areas, due primarily to strong upgrade and subscription revenues coupled with the positive effects of changes in foreign currencies.

In fiscal 2003 and part of fiscal 2004, customers in the industries we serve, particularly manufacturing, commercial construction and media and entertainment, were impacted by economic pressures in their own businesses, resulting in a difficult customer purchasing environment. During the last half of fiscal 2004, we saw a lessening of these economic pressures across the industries that constitute our customer base, particularly in the manufacturing and media and entertainment sectors. However, uncertainty remains as to the sustainability of an economic recovery in the industries we serve.

License and other revenues for fiscal 2004 were $836.7 million as compared to $748.9 million in fiscal 2003. The increase was primarily due to increased upgrade revenues across all major products as a result of our new product releases and the announced retirement of the AutoCAD 2000-based product series for early calendar 2004, as well as the positive impact of changes in foreign currencies. We expect significant upgrade revenues during fiscal 2005 as a result of new product releases across our divisions and the announcement of our retirement of the AutoCAD 2000i-based product series in January 2005. The installed base of the AutoCAD 2000i release is similar in size to the installed base of the AutoCAD 2000 release.

Maintenance revenues, consisting of revenues derived from the subscription program, were $114.9 million for fiscal 2004 as compared to $76.0 million in fiscal 2003. As a percentage of total net revenues, maintenance revenues were 12% and 9% for fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003, respectively. Our subscription program, now available to most customers in most major markets worldwide, continues to attract new customers with our planned annual product release cycle and new enhancements, such as Web support direct from Autodesk and e-learning. We expect maintenance revenues to continue to increase as a percentage of total net revenues.

Net revenues in the Americas increased 9% to $409.6 million in fiscal 2004 as compared to $374.2 million in fiscal 2003. Despite the difficult selling environment experienced during most of the first half of fiscal 2004, the overall increase is primarily due to strong upgrade and subscription revenue during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2004.

Net revenues in the Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”) region increased 28% to $337.2 million in fiscal 2004 from $263.4 million in fiscal 2003 due primarily to strong upgrade and subscription sales and favorable exchange rates. Ignoring the effects of changes in foreign currencies during the year, net revenues for EMEA increased approximately 10% as compared to fiscal 2003.

Net revenues in Asia Pacific increased 9% to $204.8 million in fiscal 2004 from $187.3 million in fiscal 2003. The increase in net revenues was due primarily to strong upgrade and subscription sales offset in part by the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome (“SARS”), especially in the Greater China region, during the second quarter of fiscal 2004. Ignoring the effects of changes in foreign currencies during the year, net revenues for Asia Pacific increased approximately 4% as compared to fiscal 2003.

For fiscal 2004, net revenues for the Design Solutions Segment were $811.7 million as compared to $694.4 million in fiscal 2003. Aggregate net revenues from sales of AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT products increased to $432.2 million in fiscal 2004 from $357.0 million in fiscal 2003. The increase in net revenues in fiscal 2004 for both the Design Solutions Segment and combined AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT products was due primarily to strong upgrade and subscription sales coupled with favorable exchange rates. Revenue from new seat licenses accounted for 50% of Design Solutions Segment fiscal 2004 revenues as compared to 65% for fiscal 2003 and upgrade revenue accounted for 27% of fiscal 2004 as compared to 15% for fiscal 2003. Maintenance revenue accounted for 14% of total Design Solutions Segment revenue for fiscal 2004 as compared to 11% in fiscal 2003. Although we have been shifting our focus to more vertically-oriented product lines, sales of AutoCAD, AutoCAD upgrades and AutoCAD LT continue to comprise a significant portion of our net revenues. Such sales, which are reflected in the net revenues for the Platform Technology Division and Other, accounted for 45% and 43% of our consolidated net revenues for fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. A critical component of our growth strategy is to convert our 2D customer base, including customers of AutoCAD, AutoCAD LT, and related vertical industry products, to our 3D products such as Autodesk Inventor Series or Autodesk Revit. However, should sales of AutoCAD, AutoCAD upgrades and AutoCAD LT products decrease without a corresponding conversion of the customer seats to 3D products, our results of operations will be adversely affected.

Net revenues for the Discreet Segment increased to $139.6 million in fiscal 2004 from $128.5 million in fiscal 2003. This increase was due primarily to demand for new versions of our advanced systems products during early fiscal 2004, increased demand related to the release of a new generation of workstations by Silicon Graphics, Inc. (“SGI”) late in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 and increased revenue from the most recent version of our 3ds max product released at the end of the third fiscal

20


quarter of fiscal 2004. Our Discreet advanced system products are generally sold as integrated solutions on workstations from SGI. Net revenues from our advanced systems products were $91.9 million during fiscal 2004 as compared to $80.1 million in fiscal 2003.

The weaker value of the U.S. dollar, relative to international currencies, had a positive impact on net revenues in fiscal 2004. Had exchange rates from the prior year been in effect in fiscal 2004, translated international revenue billed in local currencies would have been $57.8 million lower. Changes in the value of the U.S. dollar may have a significant impact on net revenues in future periods. To minimize this impact, we utilize foreign currency option collar contracts to reduce the current period exchange rate impact on the net revenue of certain anticipated transactions.

International sales accounted for approximately 63% of our net revenues in fiscal 2004 as compared to 61% in the prior fiscal year. This revenue decline resultedWe believe that international sales will continue to comprise a significant portion of net revenues. Economic weakness in an operating marginany of 3 percentthe countries which contribute a significant portion of our net revenues would have a material adverse effect on our business.

Fiscal 2003 Net Revenues Compared to Fiscal 2002 Net Revenues

Our net revenues for fiscal 2003 net revenueswere $824.9 million as compared to 10 percent$947.5 million in fiscal 2002 and 15 percent2002. Net revenues decreased in fiscal 2001.all three geographic areas. The decline in revenue this yearoverall decrease was due to two primary factors.

 

First, we faced a difficult customer purchasing environment across the industries we serve, particularly manufacturing, commercial construction and media and entertainment. Our customers both delayed purchases and purchased in smaller quantities than we would normally expect. We believe our customers were impacted by economic pressures in their own businesses.

 

Second, our revenues were impacted by a relatively slow year for new product releases across many of our divisions, leading to weakness in sales of both new commercial seats as well as sales of upgrades. In previous years, when new product cycles occurred such as for AutoCAD, our flagship product, revenues from customers upgrading and new commercial seat licenses resulted in significant revenue growth between years. During fiscal 2003, upgrade revenues for our AutoCAD-based software products decreased to $85.6$69.0 million from $258.4$229.7 million in the previous year, which is a decline much greater than the decrease in total net revenues between years. Our most significant new product releases occurred either late in fiscal 2003 or are scheduled for release early in fiscal 2004.

 

During fiscal 2002, we introduced in the U.S. the Autodesk Subscription Program, which is an option for our customers who own the most recent version of the underlying product. Through this program, which is available for a majority of our Design Solutions products as well as Discreet’s 3ds max, we offer customers strong value while allowing us to reduce our dependence on revenues from customers upgrading when new product cycles occur. While the customer subscription program met our internal growth goals during fiscal 2003, subscription revenues were not yet large enough to offset the relatively weak upgrade sales. This was due to the ratable revenue recognition model that we use for subscription bookings and the lack of availability of the subscription program in several regions outside of the U.S.

Each of our sales geographies suffered due to the two factors described above. We generate a significant amount of revenue in several countries, including the U.S., Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, France, Canada and China. Japan was particularly weak in our Asia Pacific region, due largely to continued weakness in the Japanese economy.

Our operating margins are very sensitive to reductions in sales revenues, given the relatively fixed nature of most of our operating expenses, which consist primarily of employee-related expenditures, facilities costs and depreciation and amortization expense. During fiscal 2003 we invested in several new internal product initiatives which we believe will contribute to future operating margin growth. These investments were in areas such as product lifecycle management, building lifecycle management, location based services, online collaborative services and desktop video.

We have chosen to continue each of these important investments during our current sales slowdown because we believe each of them is very promising, and we believe our ability to fund such investments during an economic slowdown is a strong competitive advantage. By continuing to fund these initiatives, we have explicitly chosen not to reduce our costs to a level that would achieve historical operating margin levels.

During fiscal 2003, we acquired three new businesses, Revit Technology Corporation, CAiCE Software Corporation and truEInnovations, Inc. These investments either provide us with future opportunities in markets where we have a limited presence or supplement existing technology. For a more detailed discussion, see Note 10, Business Combinations, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

During fiscal 2003, we continued our cost reduction efforts, primarily in areas such as employee and facilities related costs. The objective of this restructuring activity and other cost saving initiatives, such as no incentive bonus payouts and mandatory time off for our employees, was to provide a level of profitability and provide funding during fiscal 2003 for the investments described above. We believe that our recent activities will

18


result in an annual operating expense run rate between $650.0 million to $660.0 million, exclusive of any additional restructuring or unusual charges. At this operating expense level, we expect to continue to remain profitable at recent levels of revenue and be able to fund investments we believe will increase future revenues and operating margins.

Throughout fiscal 2003, we maintained a financially strong balance sheet and we generated $86.2 million of cash from our operating activities. We finished the year with $411.0 million in cash and marketable securities and a significantly higher deferred revenue balance as compared to the previous year. Over 60 percent of the deferred revenues balance at January 31, 2003 consisted of customer subscription contracts, which as described previously will be recognized as revenue ratably over the life of the contracts.

Results of Operations

Net Revenues

      

Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year


      

Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year


    
   

Fiscal 2003


  

$


   

percent


   

Fiscal 2002


  

$


   

percent


   

Fiscal 2001


   

(in millions)

Net Revenues by Geographic Area:

                              

Americas

  

$

374.2

  

$

(59.5

)

  

(14

%)

  

$

433.7

  

$

1.0

 

  

0

%

  

$

432.7

Europe

  

 

263.4

  

 

(27.4

)

  

(9

%)

  

 

290.8

  

 

(5.2

)

  

(2

%)

  

 

296.0

Asia Pacific

  

 

187.3

  

 

(35.7

)

  

(16

%)

  

 

223.0

  

 

15.4

 

  

7

%

  

 

207.6

   

  


      

  


      

   

$

824.9

  

$

(122.6

)

  

(13

%)

  

$

947.5

  

$

11.2

 

  

1

%

  

$

936.3

   

  


      

  


      

Net Revenues by Operating Segment:

                              

Design Solutions

  

$

696.4

  

$

(95.0

)

  

(12

%)

  

$

791.4

  

$

48.3

 

  

6

%

  

$

743.1

Discreet

  

 

128.5

  

 

(27.6

)

  

(18

%)

  

 

156.1

  

 

(37.1

)

  

(19

%)

  

 

193.2

   

  


      

  


      

   

$

824.9

  

$

(122.6

)

  

(13

%)

  

$

947.5

  

$

11.2

 

  

1

%

  

$

936.3

   

  


      

  


      

Net Design Solutions Revenues:

                              

Manufacturing Solutions Division

  

$

118.8

  

$

(11.4

)

  

(9

%)

  

$

130.2

  

$

(3.8

)

  

(3

%)

  

$

134.0

Infrastructure Solutions Division

  

 

103.4

  

 

(13.0

)

  

(11

%)

  

 

116.4

  

 

18.9

 

  

19

%

  

 

97.5

Building Solutions Division

  

 

73.5

  

 

(9.4

)

  

(11

%)

  

 

82.9

  

 

25.3

 

  

44

%

  

 

57.6

Platform Technology Division and Other

  

 

400.7

  

 

(61.2

)

  

(13

%)

  

 

461.9

  

 

7.9

 

  

2

%

  

 

454.0

   

  


      

  


      

   

$

696.4

  

$

(95.0

)

  

(12

%)

  

$

791.4

  

$

48.3

 

  

6

%

  

$

743.1

   

  


      

  


      

Our net revenues for fiscal 2003 were $824.9 million as compared to $947.5 million in fiscal 2002. Net revenues decreased in all three geographic areas. As previously described, the overall decrease was primarily due to a difficult selling environment across the industries we serve and by a slow year for new product releases. With most of our competitors suffering similar slowdowns, we do not believe we have lost market share to competitors. The timing of our product cycles typically impact the amount of sales in periods when new releases occur. Should the difficult economic environment continue, our net revenues in fiscal 2004 will be adversely affected.States.

 

Net revenues in the Americas decreased to $374.2 million in fiscal 2003 from $433.7 million in fiscal 2002 due primarily to lower sales of Design Solutions products as a result of poor economic conditions in the industries that constitute our customer base. Net revenues in Europe, Middle East and Africa decreased to $263.4 million in fiscal 2003 from $290.8 million in 2002 due to the impact of lower customer spending across product lines. Net revenues in Asia Pacific decreased to $187.3 million in fiscal 2003 from $223.0 million in fiscal 2002 due primarily to weakness in the Japanese economy.

 

19

In the Design Solutions Segment, net revenues from sales of combined AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT products decreased to $357.0 million in fiscal 2003 from $439.8 million in fiscal 2002 due primarily to a weak spending environment across the industries we serve, and reduced purchasing of then current product releases in anticipation of new product releases that started in March 2003. Such sales accounted for 43% of our consolidated net revenues in fiscal 2003 and 46% of our consolidated net revenues in fiscal 2002.


 

Net revenues for the Discreet Segment were $128.5 million in fiscal 2003 as compared to $156.1 million in fiscal 2002 as advanced system sales were significantly affected by the timing of new product releases and delays in customer purchases as those customers were severely impacted by the economic slow down in the media, advertising and entertainment sectors. Discreet advanced system sales are dependent upon capital spending from post production companies. Demand from post production companies is largely dependent upon television advertising spending. Television advertising spending has beenwas weak over the past two years.

In the Design Solutions Segment, net revenues from sales of combined AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT products decreased to $357.0 million in fiscal 2003 from $439.8 million in fiscal 2002 due primarily to a weak spending environment across the industries we serve, and reduced revenues in anticipation of new product releases. Although we have been reducing our dependence on key product lines, sales of AutoCAD, AutoCAD upgrades and AutoCAD LT continue to be a significant portion of our net revenues. Such sales, which are reflected in the net revenues for the Platform Technology Division and Other, accounted for 43 percent of our consolidated net revenues induring fiscal 2003 and 46 percent of our consolidated net revenues in fiscal 2002. Should sales of AutoCAD, AutoCAD upgrades and AutoCAD LT products decrease as a result of weakened demand due to poor economic conditions in the industries that constitute our customer base, our results of operations will be adversely affected.

 

The weaker value of the U.S. dollar, relative to international currencies, had a positive impact on net revenues in fiscal 2003. Had exchange rates from the prior year been in effect in fiscal 2003, translated international revenue billed in local currencies would have been $14.1 million lower. Changes in the value of the U.S. dollar may have a significant impact on net revenues in fiscal 2004.

 

21


International sales accounted for approximately 61 percent61% of our net revenues in fiscal 2003 as compared to 66 percent66% in the prior fiscal year. We believe that international sales will continue to be a significant portion of total revenues. Many world economies are in the midst of current economic slowdowns. Economic weakness in any of the countries which contribute a significant portion of our net revenues would have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our net revenues for fiscal 2002 were $947.5 million as compared to $936.3 million in fiscal 2001. Increased net revenues in Asia Pacific and the Americas were partially offset by lower sales in Europe.

Net revenues for the Discreet Segment were $156.1 million in fiscal 2002 as compared to $193.2 million in the prior fiscal year as advanced system sales were significantly affected by a slowdown in the media, advertising and entertainment sectors upon which product sales depend.

Net revenues for the Design Solutions Segment were $791.4 million in fiscal 2002 as compared to $743.1 million in the prior fiscal year. The overall increase in segment revenues was attributable to a stronger portfolio of product offerings, such as Autodesk Inventor, Autodesk Architectural Desktop, Autodesk Map, Autodesk Land Desktop and AutoCAD 2002, and increased customer demand for greater productivity tools. Sales of AutoCAD, AutoCAD upgrades and AutoCAD LT accounted for 46 percent of our consolidated net revenues in fiscal 2002 and 47 percent of our consolidated net revenues in fiscal 2001.

The stronger value of the U.S. dollar, relative to international currencies, had a negative impact on net revenues in fiscal 2002. Had exchange rates from the prior year been in effect in fiscal 2002, translated international revenue billed in local currencies would have been $23.2 million higher.

International sales accounted for approximately 66 percent of our net revenues in fiscal 2002 as compared to 60 percent in the prior fiscal year. We believe that international sales will continue to be a significant portion of total revenues.

20


 

Cost of RevenuesCosts and Expenses

 

   

Fiscal 2003


   

Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year


       

Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year


   

Fiscal 2001


 
     

$


   

percent


   

Fiscal 2002


   

$


    

percent


   
   

(in millions)

 

Cost of revenues

  

$

140.2

 

  

$

(11.0

)

  

(7

%)

  

$

151.2

 

  

$

1.0

    

1

%

  

$

150.2

 

As a percentage of net revenues

  

 

17

%

           

 

16

%

            

 

16

%

Autodesk previously classified Information Technology and other corporate service costs that benefit the entire organization as General and Administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, Autodesk re-evaluated its cost allocation methodology and reclassified these costs to other functional areas of the business that benefit from these services. As a result, fiscal 2004 General and Administrative expenses have been reduced by $46.4 million and fiscal 2004 total Cost of Revenues, Marketing and Sales and Research and Development have been increased by $5.1 million, $23.6 million and $17.7 million, respectively. This reclassification has no impact on Autodesk’s income from operations or net income. Fiscal 2003 and 2002 balances have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation. For a more detailed discussion, see Note 1, “Business and Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cost of Revenues

(in millions)     

Increase
(decrease)

compared to
prior

fiscal year


     

Increase
(decrease)

compared to
prior

fiscal year


    
   Fiscal 2004

  $

  percent

  Fiscal 2003

  $

  percent

  Fiscal 2002

 

Cost of revenues:

                          

License and other

  $132.7   ($3.0) (2%) $135.7  ($13.6) (9%) $149.3 

Maintenance

   15.4   5.3  52%  10.1  1.8  22%  8.3 
   


 


    


 

    


   $148.1  $2.3  2% $145.8  ($11.8) (7%) $157.6 
   


 


    


 

    


As a percentage of net revenues

   16%         18%        17%

 

Cost of license and other revenues includes direct material and overhead charges, royalties, amortization of purchased technology and capitalized software and the labor cost of processing orders and fulfilling service contracts. Direct material and overhead charges include the cost of hardware sold (mainly workstations manufactured by SGI for the Discreet Segment), costs associated with transferring our software to electronic media, printing of user manuals and packaging materials and shipping and handling costs.

 

The decreaseCost of $11.0license and other revenues decreased 2% during fiscal 2004, or $3.0 million, betweenas compared to fiscal years 2003 due primarily to reduced royalty expense and changes in product mix. Cost of license and other revenues in fiscal year 2003 was $13.6 million lower than fiscal year 2002 was due primarily to the mix of product sales and overall lower revenue between years.

 

The costCost of maintenance revenues includes direct program costs, amortization of capitalized software and overhead charges. Cost of maintenance revenues increased $5.3 million for fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003 primarily due to higher amortization of capitalized software related to underlying support systems and incremental direct program costs incurred as part of the expansion of the subscription program. Cost of maintenance revenues in fiscal year2003 increased $1.8 million as compared to fiscal 2002 was the same as a percentagedue primarily to additional amortization of net revenues and similar in absolute dollarscapitalized software related to cost of revenues in fiscal year 2001.underlying support systems.

 

In the future, cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues is likely to continue to be impacted by the mix of product sales, increased consulting and hosted service costs, software amortization costs, royalty rates for licensed technology embedded in our products and the geographic distribution of sales. However, we expect future cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues to remain within our historical range of 16 to 20 percent.

 

Marketing and Sales Expenses

 

  

Fiscal 2003


   

Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year


   

Fiscal 2002


   

Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year


   

Fiscal 2001


 
  

$


   

percent


   

$


    

percent


   
(in millions)    

Increase
compared

to prior fiscal
year


   

Decrease
compared

to prior fiscal
year


   
  

(in millions)

   Fiscal 2004

 $

  percent

 Fiscal 2003

 $

 percent

 Fiscal 2002

 

Marketing and sales

  

$

331.7

 

  

$

(11.8

)

  

(3

%)

  

$

343.5

 

  

$

25.7

    

8

%

  

$

317.8

 

  $393.2  $35.5  10% $357.7  ($10.2) (3%) $367.9 

As a percentage of net revenues

  

 

40

%

        

 

36

%

          

 

34

%

   41%     43%  39%

 

Marketing and sales expenses include salaries, dealer and sales commissions, and travel and facility costs for our marketing, sales, dealer training and support personnel.personnel and overhead charges. These expenses also include programs aimed at increasing revenues,

22


such as advertising, trade shows and expositions, as well as various sales and promotional programs designed for specific sales channels and end users.

 

The increase of $35.5 million between fiscal years 2004 and 2003 was due primarily to increased commission, bonus and other incentive compensation expenses of $21.3 million related to the increased sales volume as well as higher marketing costs related to new product introductions.

The decrease of $11.8$10.2 million between fiscal years 2003 and 2002 was due primarily to lower dealer and sales commissions of $4.6 million due to lower revenue, lower rent and occupancy charges of $1.4 million, which resulted from cost saving initiatives, and lower professional services of $4.5 million.

The increase of $25.7 million between fiscal years 2002 and 2001 was primarily due to higher employee-related expenses resulting from an increasing focus on direct sales to major accounts.

 

We expect to continue to invest in marketing and sales of our products to develop market opportunities and to promote our competitive position. Accordingly, we expect marketing and sales expenses to continue to be significant, both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues.

 

21


Research and Development Expenses

 

  

Fiscal 2003


   

Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year


   

Fiscal 2002


   

Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year


   

Fiscal 2001


 
  

$


    

percent


   

$


     

percent


   
(in millions)    

Increase
compared to

prior fiscal

year


   

Increase
compared to

prior fiscal
year


 
 
  

(in millions)

   Fiscal 2004

 $

  percent

 Fiscal 2003

 $

  percent

 Fiscal 2002

 

Research and development

  

$

173.0

 

  

$

4.4

    

3

%

  

$

168.6

 

  

$

(1.9

)

    

(1

%)

  

$

170.5

 

  $209.3  $19.0  10% $190.3  $5.2  3% $185.1 

As a percentage of net revenues

  

 

21

%

          

 

18

%

          

 

18

%

   22%     23%     20%

 

Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for software engineers, contract development fees, and depreciation of computer equipment used in software development. development and overhead charges.

The increase of $4.4$19.0 million between fiscal years 2004 and 2003 was due to higher bonus accruals based on current financial performance, higher costs associated with localizing our products for different markets worldwide and incremental development costs resulting from our acquisitions of Linius Technologies and Via Development Corporation during the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

The increase of $5.2 million between fiscal years 2003 and 2002 was primarily due to incremental costs resulting from our recent acquisitions of Revit Technology Corporation in April 2002 and CAiCE Software Corporation in September 2002 and our continued funding of location based services and product lifecycle management initiatives. Research and development expenses for fiscal year 2003 were offset by $3.6 million of capitalized development costs mostly associated with AutoCAD 2004, which was released in March 2003.

 

Research and development expenses in fiscal year 2002 were the same as a percentage of net revenues and similar in absolute dollars to research and development expenses in fiscal year 2001.

We expect that research and development spending will continue to be significant in fiscal 20042005 as we continue to invest in product development.

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

  

Fiscal 2003


   

Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year


   

Fiscal 2002


   

Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year


   

Fiscal 2001


 
  

$


     

percent


   

$


     

percent


   
(in millions)    

Increase
compared to

prior fiscal

year


   

Decrease
compared to

prior fiscal

year


   
  

(in millions)

   Fiscal 2004

 $

  Percent

 Fiscal 2003

 $

 percent

 Fiscal 2002

 

General and administrative

  

$

128.9

 

  

$

(2.6

)

    

(2

%)

  

$

131.5

 

  

$

(1.0

)

    

(1

%)

  

$

132.5

 

  $91.0  $10.9  14% $80.1  ($4.0) (5%) $84.1 

As a percentage of net revenues

  

 

16

%

          

 

14

%

          

 

14

%

   10%     10%  9%

 

General and administrative expenses include our information systems, finance, human resources, legal costs and other administrative operations. We generally do not allocate these costsoverhead charges.

The increase of $10.9 million between fiscal years 2004 and 2003 was due primarily to higher bonus accruals based on current financial performance offset in part by the business divisions they support, so such expenses impact general and administrative rather than costreversal of revenues, research and development or marketing and sales expenses. the Spatial legal accrual established in fiscal 2003.

The decrease of $2.6$4.0 million between fiscal years 2003 and 2002 was due primarily to lower rent and occupancy charges of $1.7 million, which resulted from cost saving initiatives, and a $4.9 million decrease in bad debt expense, as a result of improved

23


collection of trade receivables. These decreases were primarily offset by $3.5 million of additional legal settlement reserves,accruals, of which $2.5 million was specifically set aside for the Spatial legal proceedings matter.

 

GeneralGiven we do not plan to complete our restructuring activities until the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2005 and administrative expenses inwe plan to incur incremental costs related to our assessment of internal controls as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for fiscal year 2002 were the same as a percentage and similar in absolute dollars to2005, we currently expect that general and administrative expenses in fiscal year 2001.

We currently expect that in the coming year general and administrative expenses,expense, as a percentage of net revenues, will remain generally consistent within the level experienced inrange of 9% to 10% of revenue for fiscal 2003.2005.

 

Goodwill Amortization Expense

On February 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.Assets”. Therefore, Autodesk no longer amortizes goodwill but rather tests it for impairment annually in the fourth quarter. There was no impairment of goodwill during the year ended January 31, 2004 or 2003. Goodwill amortization expense was $19.9 million in fiscal 2002.

Other Intangible Amortization Expense

Amortization of purchased intangibles is provided on a straight-line basis over the respective useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years. Amortization expense was $0.5 million in fiscal 2004, $0.3 million in fiscal 2003 and $1.0 million in fiscal 2002 and $2.2 million in fiscal 2001.2002.

 

Goodwill Amortization Expense.    On February 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. Therefore, Autodesk no longer amortizes goodwill

22


but rather tests it for impairment annually in the fourth quarter. There was no impairment of goodwill during the year ended January 31, 2003. Goodwill amortization expense was $19.9 million in fiscal 2002 and $24.3 million in fiscal 2001.

Restructuring and Other Charges

 

   

Fiscal 2003


  

Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year


   

Fiscal 2002


  

Increase (decrease) compared to prior fiscal year


   

Fiscal 2001


 
     

$


   

percent


     

$


  

percent


   
   

(in millions)

 

Restructuring and other

  

$

25.9

  

$

(7.7

)

  

(23

%)

  

$

33.6

  

$

34.8

  

2900

%

  

$

(1.2

)

(in millions)     

Decrease compared to

prior fiscal year


     

Decrease compared to

prior fiscal year


   
   Fiscal 2004

  $

  percent

�� Fiscal 2003

  $

  percent

  Fiscal 2002

Restructuring and other

  $3.2  ($22.7) (88%) $25.9  ($7.7) (23%) $33.6

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 the Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan that involves the elimination of between 550 and 650 positions and the closure of a number of offices worldwide. This plan is designed to further reduce operating expense levels to enable us to achieve our targeted operating margins as well as redirect resources to product development, sales development and other critical areas. The restructuring charge under this plan is estimated to be up to $37.0 million incurred over the four quarters beginning the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. Of the $37.0 million, $26.0 million is attributable to one-time termination benefits and $11.0 million is attributable to office closure costs. As a result of this restructuring plan, we expect to realize pretax savings of $12.5 million per quarter upon completion of the plan, resulting in an annual savings of $50.0 million to be reflected in each on-going cost and expense line item in the consolidated statements of income. A portion of these annual savings will be reinvested in other parts of the business resulting in the creation of new positions in these reinvested areas.

During fiscal 2004 Autodesk recognized net $3.2 million of restructuring and other charges resulting solely from restructuring activities. The net charge of $3.2 million is comprised of $3.8 million related to the fiscal 2004 restructuring plan, recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, as well as $1.1 million related to additional office closure costs under the fiscal 2002 restructuring plan. Since the office closures in fiscal 2002, there has been a significant downturn in the commercial real estate market, particularly in areas of the United Kingdom where some of the offices are located. As such, Autodesk is unable to either buy-out the remaining lease obligations at favorable amounts or sub-lease the space at amounts originally estimated during fiscal 2002. These charges were offset by $1.7 million of credits resulting from restructuring accrual reversals related to underlying liabilities originally established under the fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003 restructuring plans. The underlying liabilities, primarily related to employee termination costs outside the United States, were ultimately settled for less than originally estimated.

Of the $3.8 million related to the fiscal 2004 plan, $0.2 million related to office closure costs and $3.6 million related to the termination of 71 employees in the United States and 15 employees outside the United States. Office closure costs included losses on operating leases and the write-off of leasehold improvements and equipment. Employee termination costs consisted of one-time termination benefits including severance benefits, medical benefits and outplacement costs.

 

During fiscal 2003 Autodesk recognized $25.9 million of restructuring and other charges resulting solely from restructuring activities.charges. Of the $25.9 million, $10.7 million related to additional costs associated with the fiscal 2002 restructuring plan and $18.2$18.3 million related to a new fiscal 2003 restructuring plan, partially offset by a credit of $3.0$2.1 million resulting fromrecorded as a result of accrual reversals.reversals and a credit of $1.0 million recorded related to the

24


reversal of the remaining restructuring charges related to our fiscal 2000 restructuring program. Of the $10.7 million, related to the fiscal 2002 plan, $1.2 million related to the further consolidation of certain European offices and the remaining $9.5 million resulted from increaseschanges to estimated accrued liabilities related to vacated facilities. Since these offices were closed in fiscal 2002, there has been a significant downturn in the real estate market, particularly in Northern California where some of the offices are located. As such, we were unable to either buyout the remaining lease obligations at favorable amounts or sub-lease the space at amounts originally estimated during fiscal 2002.

 

During the third quarter of fiscal 2003 the Board of Directors approved a new restructuring plan that resulted in the termination of 394 employees and the closure of several additional international and domestic offices. As a result of thethis restructuring plan, approved in the third quarter of 2003, we expect to realizerealized immediate pretax savings of $10.0 million per quarter and increased cash flows of $10.0 million per quarter. Thesequarter in addition to the savings are expected to last forrealized from the next several quarters and the pretax savings will be reflected in each on-going cost and expense line item in the consolidated statements of income.fiscal 2002 plan. Both the pretax and cash flow savings are being used to fundwere re-invested in other parts of the new business opportunities previously described.business. During the year ended January 31, 2003, weAutodesk recognized $18.2$18.3 million of expenses as part of this restructuring effort, of which $16.5 million related to employee termination costs and $1.7$1.8 million related to office closures. Employee termination costs consisted of wage continuation, advance notice pay, medical benefits and outplacement costs for 184 employees in the U.S.United States and 210 employees outside the U.S.United States. Office closure costs included losses on operating leases and the write-off of leasehold improvements and equipment. During fiscal year 2003 we also reversed $2.0$2.1 million and $1.0 million of facility related accruals related to restructuring reserves established in fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2000, respectively.2002. The facility-related accruals were settled for less than originally estimated.

 

During fiscal 2002 weAutodesk recognized $33.6 million of restructuring and other charges. These charges resulted from restructuring activities ($24.5 million), in-process research and development expenses related to the acquisition of the software division of Media 100 ($3.2 million)million—see Note 10, “Business Combinations”), the wind-down costs associated with the dissolution of RedSpark a development stage company ($3.6 million)million—see Note 5, “Gain on Disposal of Affiliate”), and a goodwill write-off of $2.3 million. The write-off of goodwill primarily related to an acquired Infrastructure Solutions Division business and resulted from a strategic decision to abandon the underlying product line.

 

The restructuring costs, which were part of a formal exit plan approved by our Board of Directors during the second quarter of fiscal 2002, were in connection with our effort to reduce operating expense levels. During that same quarter, we reduced our revenue estimates for the remainder of fiscal 2002. As a result of the restructuring, we realized immediate pretax savings of $6.0 million per quarter and increased cash flows of $4.0 million per quarter in addition to the savings expected to be realized from the 2003 restructuring plan.quarter. These savings are expected to last for the next several quarters and the pretax savings have been reflected in each on-going cost and expense line item in the consolidated statements of income. Both the pretax and cash flow savings were re-invested in other parts of the business.

 

23


During fiscal 2001 we reversed $1.2 million of accruals, $1.0 million of which related to a restructuring reserve established in fiscal 2000. The accruals were settled for less than originally estimated.

For additional information regarding the restructuring and other charges recorded over the past three fiscal years, see Note 11, Restructuring“Restructuring and Other,Other”, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Interest and Other Income

 

The following table sets forth the components of interest and other income, net (in thousands)millions):

 

  

2003


   

2002


   

2001


   2004

 2003

 2002

 

Interest and investment income

  

$

9,466

 

  

$

14,144

 

  

$

22,397

 

  $10.4  $9.4  $14.1 

Gains (losses) on foreign currency transactions

  

 

1,727

 

  

 

(440

)

  

 

(628

)

   3.3   1.7   (0.4)

Minority interest in net loss of RedSpark

  

 

—  

 

  

 

2,657

 

  

 

1,112

 

   —     —     2.7 

Write-downs of investments in privately-held businesses

  

 

(3,436

)

  

 

(2,861

)

  

 

(2,553

)

Realized gains (losses) on investments

  

 

2,069

 

  

 

2,775

 

  

 

(263

)

Write-downs of cost method investments

   (0.6)  (3.4)  (2.9)

Realized gains on sales of marketable securities

   1.6   2.1   2.8 

Other

  

 

3,678

 

  

 

2,783

 

  

 

983

 

   2.3   3.7   2.8 
  


  


  


  


 


 


  

$

13,504

 

  

$

19,058

 

  

$

21,048

 

  $17.0  $13.5  $19.1 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Interest and investment income increased $1.0 million during fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003 primarily due to $4.2 million of interest income related to a one time tax benefit realized during the second quarter of fiscal 2004 resulting from the favorable resolution with the IRS of an industry-wide issue regarding Foreign Sales Corporations, partially offset by continued declining interest rates on the investment of cash and marketable securities balances.

 

Investment income fluctuates based on average cash and marketable securities balances, average maturities and interest rates. The decrease in interest and other incomedecreased between fiscal 2003 2002 and 2001 was2002 primarily due to a trend of declining interest rates on the investment of cash and marketable securities balances combined with lowerbalances. Investment income fluctuates based on average cash and marketable securities balances.balances, average maturities and interest rates.

 

Gain on disposal of affiliate.affiliate

During the third quarter of fiscal 2002 we recognized a one-time non-cash gain of $9.5 million related to the dissolution of RedSpark. Because we owned greater than 50 percent50% of the voting stock, we had been consolidating RedSpark’s operating losses since RedSpark was formed in April 2000. RedSpark’s expenses, which were primarily research and development related, were included within the operating expense categories of our statementconsolidated statements of income. The gain, which resulted from the

25


reversal of the minority interest liability balance, represents the reversal of cumulative losses recognized in excess of the $3.2 million we originally invested.

Provision for income taxes

 

Provision for income taxes.Absent the impact of the non-recurring tax benefit resultingbenefits from the resolution of a Foreign Sales Corporation (“FSC”) issue and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) audit resolution for fiscal 1997-1999,2000, described below, our effective income tax rate was 27 percent24% in fiscal 2004, 27% in fiscal 2003 30 percent(absent the impact of the non-recurring tax benefit from the IRS audit resolution for fiscal 1997-1999) and 30% in fiscal 2002 (absent the impact of the gain on disposal of an affiliate) and 32 percent in fiscal 2001. The non-recurring net tax benefit of $3.8 million resulted from the resolution of our IRS audit for the fiscal years ended 1997-1999 and the establishment of U.S. deferred income taxes on previously permanently reinvested foreign earnings.. The effective tax rate for fiscal 20032004 is less than the federal statutory rate of 35 percent35% due to the extraterritorial income exclusion (“ETI”), research credits and tax-exempt interest. The fiscal 2004 tax rate was lower than the fiscal 2003 and 2002 tax rates due to a relatively higher impact of these items offset by benefits associated with our foreign earnings which are taxed at rates different from the federal statutory rate research credits and tax-exempt interest, partially offset by additional taxes provided onin the prior year foreign earnings. Additional taxes on prior year foreign earnings relate to a foreign tax audit and to intercompany transfer pricing adjustments. The fiscal 2003 tax rate was lower than the fiscal 2002 and 2001 tax rates due to a relatively higher impact of these permanent items.years.

 

Our future effective tax rate may be materially impacted by the amount of benefits associated with our foreign earnings, which are taxed at rates different from the federal statutory rate, ETI, research credits, tax-exempt interest and tax-exempt interest.changes in the tax law. We currently believe that our fiscal 20042005 effective tax rate will be less than 27 percent primarily dueapproximate 24% subject to a relatively higher impact of benefits associated withany material changes related to our foreign earnings which are taxed at rates different from the federal statutory rate.rate, ETI, research credits, tax-exempt interest and changes in the tax law.

 

At January 31, 20032004, we had net deferred tax assets of $27.2$17.6 million. Realization of these assets is dependent on our ability to generate approximately $70.0$46.0 million of future taxable income in appropriate tax jurisdictions. We believe that sufficient income will be earned in the future to realize these assets.

 

24

During fiscal 2004, we recognized an income tax benefit of $19.7 million due to a favorable resolution of an industry-wide matter surrounding our FSC for the fiscal years ended 1993 through 1998. In connection with the refund of these tax payments previously made, the Company received payment and recognized interest income of $4.2 million during fiscal 2004.


Also during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we recognized a non-recurring income tax benefit of $7.0 million resulting from the resolution of an IRS audit for the fiscal year ended 2000.

 

Equity in net loss of affiliate.affiliate

In August 2001, we acquired the remaining 60 percent60% interest in Buzzsaw, Inc. that we did not own. Consequently, from the date of the acquisition, Buzzsaw’s on-going revenues and costs and expenses have been included in each of the respective line items in our consolidated statements of income.

We In fiscal 2002, prior to the acquisition, we recognized equity in net losses of $1.2 million in fiscal 2002 and $16.3 million in fiscal 2001, representing our proportionate share of Buzzsaw’s losses during those periods. In April 2000 we invested $17.5 million in Buzzsaw and maintained a 40 percent interest. Loss recognition was suspended during the first quarter of 2002, after we fully expensed all previous investments in Buzzsaw.that period.

 

Business Combinations

 

Over the past three years, we acquired new technology or supplemented our technology by purchasing businesses focused in specific markets or industries. During this time period, we acquired the following businesses:

 

Date


  

Company and Purchase Consideration


  

Details


March 2003

VIA Development CorporationThe acquisition of certain assets of VIA Development Corporation provided us with electrical schematics, wire diagram, and controls engineering automation technology. This acquisition has been integrated into our Manufacturing Solutions Division within the Design Solutions Segment.

February 2003

Linius Technologies, Inc.The acquisition of certain assets of Linius Technologies, Inc. brought us technology that allows a wire harness designer to create 3D prototypes in our Autodesk Inventor Professional product.

26


This acquisition has been integrated into our Manufacturing Solutions Division within the Design Solutions Segment.

December 2002

  

truEInnovations, Inc.

$1.7 million in cash

  

truEInnovations, Inc. developedThis acquisition brought us file and data management software that is very tightlyhas been integrated into our Autodesk Inventor Series environment. The truEInnovations, Inc. acquisition has been integrated with our Manufacturing Solutions Division.

September 2002

  

CAiCE Software Corporation

$10.0 million in cash

  

This acquisition allowsallowed us to expand our presence in the transportation software market as well as enhance our core civil design industry business. The CAiCE acquisition has been integrated with our Infrastructure Solutions Division.

April 2002

  

Revit Technology Corporation

$139.5 million, of which $133.0 million was in cash

  

This acquisition providesprovided us with parametric building information modeling technology and provides us with potential next generation technology. The Revit acquisition has been integrated with our Building Solutions Division.

October 2001

  

Software Division of Media 100

$16.0 million in cash

  

This acquisition providesprovided us with streaming media technology, cleaner brand encoding software, production and editing tools. This business has been integrated with our Discreet segment.

August 2001

  

Buzzsaw, Inc.

$28.3 million of which $15.0 million was in cash

  

We acquired the remaining 60 percent60% of stock in Buzzsaw that we did not own. This acquisition providesprovided us with leading online project collaboration applications to improve efficiencies and reduce costs for the building industry. Buzzsaw’s results are reported in the Platform Technology Division and Other.

 

These acquisitions were all accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations.”

Of these acquisitions, $3.2 million of the Media 100 purchase price was allocated to in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) and was expensed immediately since the technology had not yet reached technological feasibility and no alternative future uses could be identified.

As of the acquisition date, the IPR&D substantially consisted of the Hitman product, an enterprise encoding system that automates the encoding process and allows for the encoding of multiple jobs at the same time. The Hitman product was 75 percent complete at the time, with $0.4 million of estimated remaining costs to reach technological feasibility. We recently released this product with actual costs to complete that approximated the initial $0.4 million estimate.

25


In valuing the developed and in-process technologies, we used a discounted cash flow analysis basedFor additional information on projected net revenues, cost of revenues, operating expenses and income taxes resulting from such technologies over a 6-year period. The projected financial results, which were discounted using a 40 percent rate for the developed technology and a 50 percent rate for the IPR&D, were based on expectations of Media 100 on a stand-alone basis.

The revenue projections for developed technologies, which considered the release dates of new products, assumed a gradual decline. We based the revenue projections for the IPR&D on expected trends in technology and the timing of new product introductions.

For a more detailed discussion of the allocation of the total purchase considerations for each of the acquired businesses described above which includes among other things liabilities assumed, see Note 10, Business Combinations,“Business Combinations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

At January 31, 20032004, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and marketable securities totaling $411.0$529.5 million and net accounts receivable of $132.8$166.8 million. Additionally, we currently have a $40.0 million line of credit with a financial institution.Other than operating leases, described below we do not engage in off-balance sheet financing arrangements or any special purpose entities.

During fiscal 2003 we generated $86.2 million of cash from operating activities as compared to $210.2 million in fiscal 2002.Cash flows from operating activities, together with the proceeds from stock issuances resulting from our employee stock plans, continue to be our principal means of generating cash. Cash flows from operating activities have historically resulted from sales of our software products and changes in working capital accounts and add-backs of non-cash expense items such as depreciation and amortization.accounts.

 

During fiscal 2004, we generated $220.1 million of cash from operating activities as compared to $85.6 million in fiscal 2003. Working capital uses of cash included increases in accounts receivable and inventories and a decrease in other accrued liabilities. Accounts receivable increased over January 2003 levels, primarily due to higher revenue. Our days sales outstanding improved to 51 days at January 31, 2004 as compared to 62 days at January 31, 2003. Overall our inventory levels were higher by 41% at the end of fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003 primarily due to higher levels of hardware for our newer Discreet Segment products. The decrease in other accrued liabilities was primarily due to the utilization of restructuring accruals during fiscal 2004. Working capital sources of cash included increases in accrued compensation, largely due to higher accruals for bonus and commission expenses based on fiscal 2004 financial performance, and deferred revenue due to higher subscription program revenues.

27


During fiscal 2004, we used $59.0 million in net cash for investing activities compared to $65.0 million during fiscal 2003. The increase in cash generated together withfrom operating activities compared to fiscal 2003 resulted in net purchases of available-for-sale investments in fiscal 2004. Capital expenditures decreased to $25.9 million in fiscal 2004 as compared to $36.1 million in fiscal 2003 due in part to cost saving measures. Current capital expenditures reflect our continuing investment in our IT infrastructure. In addition, we acquired two businesses for an aggregate $5.2 million.

We used $76.5 million in net cash and securities available at the startfor financing activities in fiscal 2004, compared to $3.9 million during fiscal 2003. The major financing use of the year,cash in both years was used to fundfor the repurchase of 4.4 million shares of our common stock for $64.8 million, the acquisition of Revit for $133.0 million, the acquisition of two other businesses for $12.2 million, capital and other expenditures of $36.1 million and dividend payments totaling $13.6 million.

shares. Between November 1999 and March 2001December 2003, the Board of Directors approved plans to repurchase up to 44.060.0 million shares of our common stock. Of these 44.0 million shares, 33.9 million have been repurchased and retired as of January 31, 2003. The purpose of the stock repurchase program is, among other things, to help offset the dilution to earnings per share caused by the issuance of stock under our employee stock plans. During fiscal 2004 we repurchased 9.1 million shares for $178.5 million and during fiscal 2003 we repurchased 4.4 million shares for $64.8 million. At January 31, 2004 approximately 17.1 million shares remained available for repurchase under the existing repurchase authorization. We expect to continue our stock repurchase programs to offset the impact of our employee equity programs. The other financing use of cash for both years was for the payment of dividends. Dividend payments were $13.4 million in fiscal 2004 and $13.6 million in fiscal 2003. The principal source of cash from financing activities was $115.4 million in fiscal 2004 and $74.7 million in fiscal 2003 of proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our stock option and stock purchase plans.

 

As of February 2003During fiscal 2004, we havehad a U.S. line of credit permittingavailable that permitted unsecured short-term unsecured borrowings of up to $40.0 million, which may be used from time to time for working capital or other business needs.million. This credit facility contains restrictive covenants that, among other provisions require Autodesk to maintain certain financial ratios and expiresexpired in February 2004.

We generally do not enter into binding purchase commitments. Principal commitments at January 31, 2003, consisted of obligations under operating leases for facilities and some computer equipment. At January 31, 2003 the future minimum lease payments under these lease commitments wereplan to renew this facility as follows (in millions). Of these amounts $10.2 million has been included in our restructuring accruals at January 31, 2003.

2004

  

$

37.8

2005

  

 

33.3

2006

  

 

21.5

2007

  

 

13.1

2008

  

 

7.5

Thereafter

  

 

28.1

   

   

$

141.3

   

26


Wewe believe our existing cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities available line of credit and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our currently anticipated short-term and long-term cash requirements. Long-term cash requirements, other than normal operating expenses, are anticipated for the development of new software products and incremental product offerings resulting from the enhancement of existing products; financing anticipated growth; dividend payments; the share repurchase program; the acquisition of businesses, software products, or technologies complementary to our business; and capital expenditures. In February 2003, we acquiredexpenditures, including the assetspurchase of Linius Technologies, Inc. for $1.0 millioncustomer relationship management software and services.

At January 31, 2004 approximately 54% of our consolidated cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were held with financial institutions in cash andthe United States; the remaining balances are held with financial institutions outside the United States. For tax consequences of the unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, see Note 4, “Income Taxes,” in March 2003, we acquired certain assets of VIA Development Corporation for approximately $4.2 million in cash. Capital expenditures for fiscal 2004 are currently anticipatedthe Notes to approximate what was incurred during fiscal 2003, but could be reduced if our revenues are less than anticipated.Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Our international operations are subject to currency fluctuations. To minimize the impact of these fluctuations, we use foreign currency option contracts to hedge our exposure on anticipated transactions and forward contracts to hedge our exposure on firm commitments, primarily certain payablesreceivables and receivablespayables denominated in foreign currencies. Our foreign currency instruments, by policy, have maturities of less than three months and settle before the end of each quarterly period. The principal currencies hedged during fiscal 20032004 were the Euro,euro, Swiss franc,francs, Canadian dollars, British pound, Canadian dollarpounds and Japanese yen. We monitor our foreign exchange exposures to ensure the overall effectiveness of our foreign currency hedge positions.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our significant financial contractual obligations at January 31, 2004 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods. This table excludes amounts already recorded on our balance sheet as current liabilities at January 31, 2004.

   Payments due by period

(in millions)  Total

  

Less than

1 year


  1 –3 years

  3 –5 years

  More than
5 years


Operating lease obligations

  $120.9  $38.6  $45.4  $14.4  $22.5

Purchase obligations

   15.5   12.8   2.7   —     —  
   

  

  

  

  

Total(1)

  $136.4  $51.4  $48.1  $14.4  $22.5

(1)Total does not include contractual obligations recorded on the balance sheet or certain purchase obligations as discussed below.

For the purposes of this table, contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding on Autodesk and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Purchase orders or contracts for the purchase of supplies, services and other goods and services are not included in the table above. We are not able to determine the aggregate amount of such purchase orders that represent contractual obligations, as purchase orders may represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements. Our purchase orders are based on our current procurement or development needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time horizons. We do not have significant agreements for the purchase of supplies, services or other goods specifying minimum quantities or set prices that exceed our

28


expected requirements for three months. We also enter into contracts for outsourced services; however in most instances, the obligations under these contracts were not significant and the contracts contain clauses allowing for cancellation without significant penalty. In addition we have certain software royalty commitments associated with the shipment and licensing of certain products. Royalty expense is generally based on the number of units shipped or a percentage of the underlying revenue. Royalty expense, included in cost of license and other revenues, was $8.6 million, $7.6 million and $10.8 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Principal commitments at January 31, 2004, consisted of obligations under operating leases for facilities and computer equipment, IT infrastructure costs, marketing costs, contractual development costs and certain capital expenditures related to the purchase and implementation of customer relationship management software and services.

The expected timing of payment of the obligations discussed above is estimated based on current information. Timing of payments and actual amounts paid may be different depending on the time of receipt of goods or services or changes to agreed-upon amounts for some obligations.

We provide indemnifications of varying scopes and certain guarantees, including limited product warranties. Historically, costs related to these warranties and indemnifications have not been significant, and because potential future costs are highly variable, we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these guarantees on our future results of operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Other than operating leases, we do not engage in off-balance sheet financing arrangements or have any variable-interest entities. As of January 31, 2004 we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.

 

Stock Compensation

 

We maintain three active stock option plans for the purpose of granting stock options to employees and members of Autodesk’s Board of Directors: the 1996 Stock Plan (available to employees but not directors), the Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (available only to non-executive employees) and the 2000 Directors’ Option Plan (available only to outside directors). Additionally, there are five expired plans with options outstanding. Our 1996 Stock Plan expires during calendar 2006.

 

Our stock option program is a broad-based, long-term retention program. Essentially all of our employees participate. Approximately 91 percent88% of the options we granted during fiscal 20032004 were awarded to employees other than our CEO and four of the most highly compensated executive officers. Options granted under the above mentionedabove-mentioned plans vest over periods ranging from one to five years and expire within ten years. The exercise price of the stock options is equal to the fair market value of the stock on the grant date.

 

With the exception of grants to our outside directors, all stock option grants to executive officers and guidelines for grants to other employees are made by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors. All members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors, as defined in the application rules for issuers traded on The Nasdaq StockNational Market. See the “Report of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors on Executive Compensation” appearing in Autodesk’s proxy statement dated May 20, 2002,2003, for further information concerning theAutodesk’s policies and procedures of Autodesk and the Compensation Committee regarding the use of stock options. Grants to our outside directors are non-discretionary and are pre-determined by the terms of the 2000 Directors’ Option Plan.

 

Additional information regarding stock compensation is incorporated by reference to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled “Employee and Director Stock Options”.

27


 

Risk Factors Which May Impact Future Operating Results

 

We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of risks, many of which are beyond our control. The following discussion highlights some of these risks and the possible impact of these factors on future results of operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be adversely impacted, causing the trading price of our common stock to decline.

 

General economic conditions may continue to reduce our net revenues and harm our business.

As our business has grown, we have become increasingly subject to the risks arising from adverse changes in domestic and global economic and political conditions, including the conflict in the Persian Gulf and the potential economic impact from current concerns about severe acute respiratory syndrome (“SARS”). Because of the continued slowdown in the U.S. and other countries’ economies, many customers are delaying or reducing technology purchases. If this slowdown continues, particularly in industries or countries that contribute a significant portion of our net revenues, it will likely continue to result in reductions in sales of our products, longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies and increased price competition. In addition, weakness in the end-user market could continue to negatively affect the cash flow of our distributors and resellers who could, in turn, delay paying their obligations to us, which would increase our credit risk exposure. Any of these events would likely harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Because we derive a substantial portion of our net revenues from a limited number of products, if these products are not successful, our net revenues will be adversely affected.

 

We derive a substantial portion of our net revenues from sales of AutoCAD software, including products based on AutoCAD that serve specific vertical markets, upgrades to those products and products that are interoperable with AutoCAD. As such, any factor adversely affecting sales of these products, including product liferelease cycle, market acceptance, product

29


performance and reliability, reputation, price competition and the availability of third-party applications, would likely harm our operating results.

 

In the Discreet business, our customers’ buying patterns are heavily influenced by advertising and entertainment industry cycles, which hashave resulted in and may continue to have a negative impact on our operating results. In addition, Discreet’s advanced systems products rely on workstations manufactured by Silicon Graphics, and failureInc. (“SGI”). Failure of Silicon GraphicsSGI to deliver products or product upgrades in a timely manner would likely result in an adverse effect upon our financial results for a given period.

 

Our operating results fluctuate within each quarter and from quarter to quarter making our future revenues and operating results difficult to predict.

 

Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to do so in the future. These fluctuations could cause our stock price to change significantly or experience declines. Some of the factors that could cause our operating results to fluctuate include, among other things, the timing of the introduction of new products by us or our competitors, slowing of momentum in upgrade or maintenance revenue, failure to achieve anticipated levels of customer acceptance of key new applications, unexpected costs or changes in marketing or other operating expenses, changes in product pricing or product mix, platform changes, delays in product releases, distribution channel management, changes in sales compensation practices, the timing of large systems sales and general economic or political conditions, particularly in countries where we derive a significant portion of our net revenues.

 

We have also experienced fluctuations in operating results in interim periods in certain geographic regions due to seasonality or regional economic conditions. In particular, our operating results in Europe during the third quarter are usually impacted by a slow summer period, and the Asia Pacific operations typically experience seasonal slowing in the third and fourth quarters. Operating expenses may also increase in periods when major product releases occur.

 

28


Additionally, our operating expenses are based in part on our expectations for future revenues and are relatively fixed in the short term. Accordingly, any revenue shortfall below expectations could have an immediate and significant adverse effect on our profitability. Further, gross margins may be adversely affected if our sales of AutoCAD LT, upgrades and systems products, which historically have had lower margins, grow at a faster rate than sales of our higher-margin products.

General economic conditions may affect our net revenues and harm our business.

As our business has grown, we have become increasingly subject to the risks arising from adverse changes in domestic and global economic and political conditions. If economic growth in the United States and other countries’ economies is slowed, many customers may delay or reduce technology purchases. This could result in reductions in sales of our products, longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies and increased price competition. In addition, weakness in the end-user market could negatively affect the cash flow of our distributors and resellers who could, in turn, delay paying their obligations to us, which would increase our credit risk exposure. Any of these events would likely harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Existing and increased competition may reduce our net revenues and profits.

 

The software industry has limited barriers to entry, and the availability of desktop computers with continually expanding performance at progressively lower prices contributes to the ease of market entry. The markets in which we compete are fairly mature and characterized by vigorous competition, both by entry of competitors with innovative technologies and by consolidation of companies with complementary products and technologies. In addition, some of our competitors have greater financial, technical, sales and marketing and other resources. Furthermore, a reduction in the number and availability of comparable third-party applications may adversely affect the sale of our products. Because of these and other factors, competitive conditions in the industry are likely to intensify in the future. Increased competition could result in continued price reductions, reduced net revenues and profit margins and loss of market share, any of which would likely harm our business.

 

We believe that our future results depend largely upon our ability to offer products that compete favorably with respect to reliability, performance, ease of use, range of useful features, continuing product enhancements, reputation and price.

 

30


We rely on third party technologies and if we are unable to use or integrate these technologies, our product and service development may be delayed.

 

We rely on certain software that we license from third parties, including software that is integrated with internally developed software and used in our products to perform key functions. An example of this type of software is the ACIS geometric solid modeler we license from Spatial.Spatial Corp. These third-party software licenses may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, and the software may not be appropriately supported, maintained or enhanced by the licensors. The loss of licenses to, or inability to support, maintain and enhance any such software could result in increased costs, or in delays or reductions in product shipments until equivalent software could be developed, identified, licensed and integrated, which would likely harm our business.

 

In addition, for certain of our products and services, we rely on third party hardware and services.services, like the workstations supplied by SGI. Financial difficulties or even failure of these third parties, like SGI, may impact our ability to deliver such on-line collaboration applicationsproducts and services and, as a result, may adversely impact our business.

 

Disruptions with licensing relationships, independent developers and third party developers could adversely impact our business.

 

Independent firms and contractors perform some of our product development activities, while other technologies are licensed from third parties. Licenses may restrict use of such technology in ways that negatively affect our business. We generally either own or license the software developed by third parties.

 

Because talented development personnel are in high demand, independent developers, including those who currently develop products for us, may not be able or willing to provide development support to us in the future. Similarly, we may not be able to obtain and renew license agreements on favorable terms, if at all, and any failure to do so could harm our business.

 

Our business strategy has historically depended in part on our relationships with third-party developers, who provide products that expand the functionality of our design software. Some developers may elect to support other products or may experience disruption in product development and delivery cycles or financial pressure

29


during periods of economic downturn. In particular markets, this disruption would likely negatively impact these third-party developers and end users, which could harm our business.

 

Net revenues or earnings shortfalls or the volatility of the market generally may cause the market price of our stock to decline, which could harm our business.

 

The market price for our common stock has experienced significant fluctuations and may continue to fluctuate significantly. The market price for our common stock may be affected by a number of factors, including the following: net revenues or earnings shortfalls and changes in estimates or recommendations by securities analysts; the announcement of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors; quarterly variations in our or our competitors’ results of operations; developments in our industry; one-time events such as acquisitions and litigation; and general market conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors.

 

In addition, stock prices for many companies in the technology sector have experienced wide fluctuations that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. Historically, after extended periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, a company becomes more susceptible to securities class action litigation. This type of litigation is often expensive and diverts management’s attention and resources.

 

Our efforts to develop and introduce new products and service offerings expose us to risks such as limited customer acceptance, costs related to product defects and large expenditures that may not result in additional net revenues.

 

Rapid technological change as well as changes in customer requirements and preferences characterize the software industry. We are devoting significant resources to the development of technologies, like our Linux based applications in the Discreet Segment, and service offerings to address demands in the marketplace for increased connectivity and use of digital data created by computer-aided design software. As a result, we are transitioning to new business models, requiring a considerable investment of technical and financial resources. Such investments may not result in sufficient revenue generation to justify their costs, or competitors may introduce new products and services that will achieve acceptance among our current customers, adversely affecting our competitive position. In particular, a critical component of our growth strategy is to convert our 2D customer base, including customers of AutoCAD, AutoCAD LT, and related vertical industry products, to our 3D products such as Autodesk Inventor Series or Autodesk Revit. However, should sales of AutoCAD, AutoCAD upgrades and AutoCAD LT products

31


decrease without a corresponding conversion of the customer seats to 3D products, our results of operations will be adversely affected.

 

Additionally, the software products we offer are complex, and despite extensive testing and quality control, may contain errors or defects. These defects or errors could result in corrective releases to our software products, damage to our reputation, loss of revenues, an increase in product returns or lack of market acceptance of our products, any of which would likely harm our business.

 

Our business could suffer as a result of risks associated with strategic acquisitions, divestures and investments.

 

We periodically acquire or invest in businesses, software products and technologies that are complementary to our business through strategic alliances, equity investments and the like. For example, in April 2002February 2003 we acquired Revitassets of Linius Technologies, Inc., in March 2003 we acquired certain assets of VIA Development Corporation, and in September 2002March 2004 we acquired CAiCE.entered into an agreement to purchase certain assets of MechSoft.com, Inc., subject to standard closing contingencies. The risks associated with such acquisitions or investments include, among others, the difficulty of assimilating the operations and personnel of the companies, the failure to realize anticipated synergies and the diversion of management’s time and attention. In addition, such investments and acquisitions, as well as business divestures, may involve significant transaction-related costs. We may not be successful in overcoming such risks, and such investments, acquisitions and acquisitionsdivestures may negatively impact our business. In addition, such investments and acquisitions have in the past and may in the future contribute to potential fluctuations in quarterly results of operations. The fluctuations could arise from merger-related costs and charges associated with eliminating redundant expenses or write-offs of impaired assets recorded in connection with acquisitions. These costs or charges could negatively impact results of operations for a given period or cause lack of a consistent increase quarter to quarter variability in our operating results.

30


 

Our international operations expose us to significant regulatory, intellectual property, collections, exchange fluctuations and other risks, which could adversely impact our future net revenues.revenues and increase our net expenses.

 

We anticipate that international operations will continue to account for a significant portion of our consolidated net revenues.revenues and will provide significant support to our overall development efforts. Risks inherent in our international operations include the following: unexpected changes in regulatory practices and tariffs, difficulties in staffing and managing foreign sales and development operations, longer collection cycles for accounts receivable, potential changes in tax laws and laws regarding the management of data, greater difficulty in protecting intellectual property and the impact of fluctuating exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies in markets where we do business.

 

Our international results maywill also continue to be impacted by general economic and political conditions in these foreign markets or in specific large foreign markets. In particular, war in the Persian Gulf or the potential economic impact from concerns about SARSthe failure of expected continued growth in Asia Pacific (particularly China) in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 could disrupt trade and market relationships in a way that could harm our business. These and other factors may adversely impact our future international operations and consequently our business as a whole.

 

Our risk management strategy uses derivative financial instruments in the form of foreign currency forward and option contracts for the purpose of hedging foreign currency market exposures in the current quarter, which exist as a part of our ongoing business operations. Nevertheless, significant fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and foreign currency markets may adversely impact our future net revenues.

 

If we do not maintain our relationship with the members of our distribution channel, or achieve anticipated levels of sell-through, our ability to generate net revenues will be adversely affected.

 

We sell our software products both directly to customers and through a network of distributors and resellers. Our ability to effectively distribute our products depends in part upon the financial and business condition of our reseller network. Computer software dealers and distributors are typically not highly capitalized and have previously experienced difficulties during times of economic contraction such as current worldwide economic conditions, and may do so in the future. While we have processes to ensure that we assess the creditworthiness of dealers and distributors prior to our sales to them, if their financial condition were to deteriorate, they might not be able to make repeat purchases. In addition, the changing distribution models resulting from the Internet, from increased focus on direct sales to majorstrategic accounts or from two-tiered distribution may impact our reseller network in the future. No single customer, distributor or reseller accounted for more than 10 percent10% of our consolidated net revenues in during fiscal 2004, 2003 2002 or 2001. However, we2002. We rely significantly upon major distributors and resellers in both the U.S. and international regions and theregions. The loss of or a significant reduction in business with those distributors or resellers or the failure to achieve anticipated levels of sell-through with any one of our major international distributors or large resellers could harm our business. In particular, if one or more of such resellers should be unable to meet their

32


obligations with respect to accounts payable to us, we could be forced to write off such accounts, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in a given period.

 

Product returns could exceed our estimates and harm our net revenues.

 

With the exception of contracts with some distributors, our sales contracts do not contain specific product-return privileges. However, we permit our distributors and resellers to return products in certain instances. For example, we generally allow our distributors and resellers to return older versions of products which have been superceded by new product releases. We anticipate that product returns will continue to be impacted by product update cycles, new product releases such as AutoCAD 2004 and software quality.

 

We establish reserves for stock balancing and product rotation. These reserves are based on historical experience, estimated channel inventory levels and the timing of new product introductions and other factors. While we maintain strict measures to monitor these reserves, actual product returns may differ from our reserve estimates, and such differences could harm our business.

 

31


If we are not able to adequately protect our proprietary rights, our business could be harmed.

 

We rely on a combination of patents, copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. Despite such efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties from time to time have copied aspects of our software products or have obtained and used information that we regard as proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of our software products is time-consuming and costly. While we have recovered some revenues resulting from the unauthorized use of our software products, we are unable to measure the extent to which piracy of our software products exists, and software piracy can be expected to be a persistent problem. Furthermore, our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate, and our competitors may independently develop similar technology.

 

We may face intellectual property infringement claims that could be costly to defend and result in our loss of significant rights.

 

We expect thatAs more and more software product developers will be increasingly subject to infringement claimspatents are granted worldwide and as the number of products and competitors in our industry segments grows and as the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps.overlap, we expect that software product developers will be increasingly subject to infringement claims. Infringement, invalidityinvalid claims or misappropriation claims may be asserted against us, and any such assertions could harm our business. Litigation often becomes more likely in times of economic downturn. Additionally, certain patent holders have become more aggressive in threatening litigation in attempts to obtain fees for licensing the right to use patents. Any such claims or threats, whether with or without merit, could be time-consuming to defend, result in costly litigation and diversion of resources, cause product shipment delays, or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. In addition, such royalty or license agreements, if required, may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all, which would likely harm our business.

 

The loss of key personnel or the inabilityIf we are required to expense options granted under our employee stock plans as compensation, our net income and earnings per share would be significantly reduced and we may be forced to change our business practices to attract and retain additional personnel could harm our business.employees.

 

Our continued growthHistorically, we have used stock options as a key component of our employee compensation packages. We believe that stock options provide an incentive to our employees to maximize long-term stockholder value and, success depends significantly onthrough the continued serviceuse of highly skilledvesting, encourage valued employees to remain with us. Certain proposals related to accounting for the grant of an employee stock option as an expense have been issued for comment by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. If such proposals are implemented, our net income and earnings per share will be negatively impacted. As a result, we may decide to reduce the number of employees who receive stock options or grant fewer options to particular employees. This could adversely affect our ability to retain existing employees and independent developers. attract qualified candidates, and also could increase the cash compensation we would have to pay to them.

Our abilityplanned restructuring for fiscal year 2005 could result in disruptions to attract and retain key personnel is dependent on a number of factors, including our continued abilitybusiness or to grant stock incentive awards. Changes in the accounting rules for stock options,our employee base which are granted to most of our employees and which have been a significant factor in attracting and retaining key technical and management experts, could have a material adverse effect on our business. The loss of key personnel or inability to recruit new employees or independent developers would negatively impact anticipated revenues during those periods.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we announced a planned restructuring which included workforce reduction and closure of certain facilities. We expect related restructuring charges to be charged through the third quarter of fiscal 2005. If we fail to effect all of the planned headcount and facilities reductions, our business. In addition, weresults of operations for those periods may experience increased compensation costsbe negatively impacted

33


or may result in unanticipated fluctuations in quarterly results of operations. Additionally, disruptions to attract and retain skilled personnel.our employee base may adversely impact anticipated revenues during those periods.

ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Foreign currency exchange risk

 

Our revenues, earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our risk management strategy utilizes foreign currency forward and option contracts to manage our foreign currency exposures that exist as part of our ongoing business operations. Contracts are primarily denominated in Euro,euro, Swiss francs,Franc, Canadian dollars,dollar, British pounds and Japanese yen. We do not enter into any foreign exchange derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

 

A sensitivity analysis, was performed on our hedging portfolio as of January 31, 2003. This analysis2004, indicated that a hypothetical 10 percent10% appreciation of the U.S. dollar from its value at January 31, 2004 would increase the fair value of our forward exchange and option contracts by $6.1 million. Conversely, a hypothetical 10% depreciation of the dollar from its value at January 31, 2004 would decrease the fair value of our forward exchange and option contracts by $4.1 million. These results are consistent with the sensitivity analysis performed on our hedging portfolio as of January 31, 2003, which indicated that a hypothetical 10% appreciation of the U.S. dollar from its value at January 31, 2003 would increasehave increased the fair value of our forward exchange/exchange and option contracts by $6.6 million. Conversely,million and a hypothetical 10 percent10% depreciation of the dollar from its value at January 31, 2003 would decreasehave decreased the fair value of our forward exchange/exchange and option contracts by $4.4 million. We do not anticipate any material adverse impact to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as a result of these foreign currency forward and option contracts.

 

32


Interest rate sensitivity

 

We had an investment portfolio of fixed income securities, including those classified as security deposits, of $247.3 million at January 31, 2004 and $224.7 million at January 31, 2003. These securities are subject to interest rate fluctuations and will decrease in market value if interest rates increase.

 

A sensitivity analysis was performed on our investment portfolio as of January 31, 2003.2004. This sensitivity analysis is based on a modeling technique that measures the hypothetical market value changes that would result from a parallel shift in the yield curve of plus 50, plus 100 or plus 150 basis points occurring in either six months or 12 months. For the 6-monthsix-month time horizon the market value changes for a 50, 100, or 150 basis point increase were reductions of $1.6 million, $3.1 million and $4.6 million, respectively. For the 12-month time horizon the market value changes for a 50, 100 or 150 basis point increase were reductions of $1.3 million, $2.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively.

The same sensitivity analysis was performed on our investment portfolio as of January 31, 2003. For the six-month time horizon the market value changes for a 50, 100, or 150 basis point increase were reductions of $1.7 million, $3.3 million and $4.9 million, respectively. For the 12-month time horizon the market value changes for a 50, 100 or 150 basis point increase were reductions of $1.4 million, $2.8 million and $4.1 million, respectively.

 

We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio to manage interest rate risk. We place our investments in instruments that meet high credit quality standards, as specified in our investment policy guidelines, which limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issue, issuer or type of instrument.

 

Investments in privately-held businesses

 

We have an investment portfolio with a remaining net book value of approximately $0.6 million as of January 31, 2003 that includes minority equity investments in several privately-held technology companies, many of which are in the development stage. We account for these minority equity investments using the cost method of accounting because our ownership interests are less than 20 percent20% and we do not have the ability to exert significant influence on the investees.

These investments are inherently risky because At January 31, 2004, the markets for the technologies or products the portfolio companies have under development are typically in the early stages and may never develop into commercially viable products. We assess theremaining net book value of these investments on a regular basis and when we identify other than temporary declines in the values of these investments, we write down the carrying valueswas reduced to their fair values.zero. Write downs of our investments in privately-held businesses totaled $0.6 million in fiscal 2004, $3.4 million in fiscal 2003 and $2.9 million in fiscal 2002 and $2.6 million in fiscal 2001. Due to the inherently risky nature of these investments, we may incur additional losses in the future up to the remaining carrying value of $0.6 million recorded in our consolidated balance sheet at January 31, 2003.2002.

 

33

34


ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The supplementary data required by Item 8 is presented in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

AUTODESK, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

 

  

Fiscal year ended January 31,


 
  

2003


   

2002


   

2001


   Fiscal year ended January 31,

 
  

(in thousands, except per share data)

   2004

 2003

 2002

 

Net revenues

  

$

824,945

 

  

$

947,491

 

  

$

936,324

 

  (in thousands, except per share data) 

Net revenues:

   

License and other

  $836,737  $748,944  $901,812 

Maintenance

   114,906   76,001   45,679 
  


 


 


Total net revenues

   951,643   824,945   947,491 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Costs and expenses:

            

Cost of revenues

  

 

140,162

 

  

 

151,203

 

  

 

150,198

 

Cost of license and other revenues

   132,727   135,687   149,314 

Cost of maintenance revenues

   15,401   10,123   8,314 

Marketing and sales

  

 

331,721

 

  

 

343,508

 

  

 

317,806

 

   393,234   357,667   367,930 

Research and development

  

 

172,985

 

  

 

168,574

 

  

 

170,487

 

   209,349   190,252   185,084 

General and administrative

  

 

128,929

 

  

 

131,499

 

  

 

132,524

 

   90,990   80,068   84,142 

Amortization of goodwill and purchased intangibles

  

 

299

 

  

 

20,903

 

  

 

26,529

 

   522   299   20,903 

Restructuring and other

  

 

25,887

 

  

 

33,630

 

  

 

(1,234

)

   3,183   25,887   33,630 
  


  


  


  


 


 


  

 

799,983

 

  

 

849,317

 

  

 

796,310

 

Total costs and expenses

   845,406   799,983   849,317 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Income from operations

  

 

24,962

 

  

 

98,174

 

  

 

140,014

 

   106,237   24,962   98,174 

Interest and other income, net

  

 

13,504

 

  

 

19,058

 

  

 

21,048

 

   16,959   13,504   19,058 

Gain on disposal of affiliate

  

 

—  

 

  

 

9,461

 

  

 

—  

 

   —     —     9,461 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Income before income taxes

  

 

38,466

 

  

 

126,693

 

  

 

161,062

 

   123,196   38,466   126,693 

Provision for income taxes

  

 

(6,562

)

  

 

(35,169

)

  

 

(51,540

)

   (2,880)  (6,562)  (35,169)

Equity in net loss of affiliate

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(1,211

)

  

 

(16,289

)

   —     —     (1,211)
  


  


  


  


 


 


Net income

  

$

31,904

 

  

$

90,313

 

  

$

93,233

 

  $120,316  $31,904  $90,313 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Basic net income per share

  

$

0.28

 

  

$

0.83

 

  

$

0.82

 

  $1.08  $0.28  $0.83 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Diluted net income per share

  

$

0.28

 

  

$

0.80

 

  

$

0.80

 

  $1.04  $0.28  $0.80 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Shares used in computing basic net income per share

  

 

113,035

 

  

 

108,815

 

  

 

114,375

 

   111,497   113,035   108,815 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Shares used in computing diluted net income per share

  

 

114,775

 

  

 

112,275

 

  

 

117,028

 

   115,652   114,775   112,275 
  


  


  


  


 


 


 

See accompanying notes.

 

34

35


AUTODESK, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

  

January 31, 2003


   

January 31, 2002


   January 31,
2004


 January 31,
2003


 
  

(in thousands)

   (in thousands) 

ASSETS

           

Current assets:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

  

$

186,377

 

  

$

157,687

 

  $282,249  $186,377 

Marketable securities

  

 

60,643

 

  

 

180,124

 

   81,275   60,643 

Accounts receivable, net

  

 

132,803

 

  

 

140,465

 

   166,816   132,803 

Inventories

  

 

12,284

 

  

 

17,999

 

   17,365   12,284 

Deferred income taxes

  

 

28,923

 

  

 

31,477

 

   25,410   28,923 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  

 

28,602

 

  

 

36,118

 

   24,137   28,602 
  


  


  


 


Total current assets

  

 

449,632

 

  

 

563,870

 

   597,252   449,632 
  


  


Marketable securities

  

 

164,029

 

  

 

166,800

 

   165,976   164,029 

Computer equipment, software, furniture and leasehold improvements, at cost:

         

Computer equipment, software and furniture

  

 

210,900

 

  

 

200,568

 

   206,319   210,900 

Leasehold improvements

  

 

32,913

 

  

 

29,652

 

   34,526   32,913 

Less accumulated depreciation

  

 

(167,691

)

  

 

(157,400

)

   (174,371)  (167,691)
  


  


  


 


Net computer equipment, software, furniture and leasehold improvements

  

 

76,122

 

  

 

72,820

 

   66,474   76,122 

Purchased technologies and capitalized software, net

  

 

30,125

 

  

 

19,336

 

   19,378   30,125 

Goodwill, net

  

 

155,945

 

  

 

39,987

 

   160,094   155,945 

Deferred income taxes

  

 

—  

 

  

 

29,459

 

Other assets

  

 

7,797

 

  

 

10,172

 

   7,986   7,797 
  


  


  


 


  

$

883,650

 

  

$

902,444

 

  $1,017,160  $883,650 
  


  


  


 


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

           

Current liabilities:

         

Accounts payable

  

$

45,122

 

  

$

53,769

 

  $52,307  $45,122 

Accrued compensation

  

 

44,869

 

  

 

57,540

 

   92,830   44,869 

Accrued income taxes

  

 

39,802

 

  

 

91,922

 

   50,695   39,802 

Deferred revenues

  

 

93,241

 

  

 

65,474

 

   127,276   93,241 

Other accrued liabilities

  

 

86,994

 

  

 

101,946

 

   61,814   86,994 
  


  


  


 


Total current liabilities

  

 

310,028

 

  

 

370,651

 

   384,922   310,028 

Deferred income taxes, net

  

 

1,678

 

  

 

—  

 

   7,849   1,678 

Other liabilities

  

 

2,736

 

  

 

2,479

 

   2,746   2,736 

Commitments and contingencies

         

Stockholders’ equity:

         

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 2,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding at January 31, 2003 and 2002

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.01 par value; 250,000 shares authorized; 112,264 shares outstanding at January 31, 2003 (111,287 shares in 2002)

  

 

479,874

 

  

 

458,135

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 2,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding at January 31, 2004 and 2003

   —     —   

Common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.01 par value; 400,000 shares authorized; 111,720 shares outstanding at January 31, 2004 (112,264 shares in 2003)

   473,673   479,874 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  

 

(11,568

)

  

 

(19,972

)

   (4,754)  (11,568)

Deferred compensation

  

 

(2,185

)

  

 

(713

)

   (451)  (2,185)

Retained earnings

  

 

103,087

 

  

 

91,864

 

   153,175   103,087 
  


  


  


 


Total stockholders’ equity

  

 

569,208

 

  

 

529,314

 

   621,643   569,208 
  


  


  


 


  

$

883,650

 

  

$

902,444

 

  $1,017,160  $883,650 
  


  


  


 


 

See accompanying notes.

 

35

36


AUTODESK, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

  

Fiscal year ended January 31,


   Fiscal year ended January 31,

 
  

2003


   

2002


   

2001


   2004

 2003

 2002

 
  

(in thousands)

   (in thousands) 

Operating activities

            

Net income

  

$

31,904

 

  

$

90,313

 

  

$

93,233

 

  $120,316  $31,904  $90,313 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

            

Charge for acquired in-process research and development

  

 

—  

 

  

 

3,180

 

  

 

—  

 

   —     —     3,180 

Depreciation and amortization

  

 

48,844

 

  

 

62,907

 

  

 

68,844

 

   50,292   48,844   62,907 

Stock compensation expense

   1,775   2,753   769 

Gain on disposal of affiliate

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(9,461

)

  

 

—  

 

   —     —     (9,461)

Write-downs of cost-method and other investments

  

 

3,436

 

  

 

2,861

 

  

 

2,553

 

Write-downs of cost-method investments

   596   3,436   2,861 

Equity in net loss of affiliate

  

 

—  

 

  

 

1,211

 

  

 

16,289

 

   —     —     1,211 

Net loss on fixed asset disposals

  

 

940

 

  

 

2,016

 

  

 

—  

 

   —     940   2,016 

Tax benefits from employee stock plans

  

 

—  

 

  

 

12,176

 

  

 

21,055

 

   —     —     12,176 

Restructuring related reserve additions (reversals), net

  

 

25,887

 

  

 

26,816

 

  

 

(1,034

)

Restructuring related charges, net

   3,183   25,887   26,816 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business combinations:

            

Accounts receivable

  

 

8,202

 

  

 

18,383

 

  

 

(46,583

)

   (34,013)  8,202   18,383 

Inventories

  

 

5,715

 

  

 

(357

)

  

 

2,009

 

   (5,081)  5,715   (357)

Deferred income taxes

  

 

38,990

 

  

 

7,789

 

  

 

6,170

 

   9,684   38,990   7,789 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  

 

7,657

 

  

 

(5,771

)

  

 

(725

)

   4,465   7,657   (5,771)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  

 

(60,271

)

  

 

(8,576

)

  

 

8,016

 

   23,938   (63,623)  (9,035)

Deferred revenues

  

 

27,050

 

  

 

11,856

 

  

 

17,189

 

   34,035   27,050   11,856 

Accrued income taxes

  

 

(52,120

)

  

 

(5,187

)

  

 

9,103

 

   10,893   (52,120)  (5,187)
  


  


  


  


 


 


Net cash provided by operating activities

  

 

86,234

 

  

 

210,156

 

  

 

196,119

 

   220,083   85,635   210,466 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Investing activities

            

Investments in unconsolidated companies

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(25,799

)

Purchases of available-for-sale marketable securities

  

 

(837,560

)

  

 

(1,416,274

)

  

 

(2,353,616

)

   (421,540)  (837,560)  (1,416,274)

Sales and maturities of available-for-sale marketable securities

  

 

960,565

 

  

 

1,359,457

 

  

 

2,476,310

 

   397,501   960,565   1,359,457 

Business combinations, net of cash acquired

  

 

(145,231

)

  

 

(34,271

)

  

 

—  

 

   (5,150)  (145,231)  (34,271)

Capital and other expenditures

  

 

(36,103

)

  

 

(45,068

)

  

 

(32,412

)

   (25,852)  (36,103)  (45,068)

Purchases of software technologies and capitalization of software development costs

  

 

(3,656

)

  

 

(12,365

)

  

 

(3,094

)

   (4,230)  (3,656)  (12,365)

Other investing activities

  

 

(3,033

)

  

 

2,970

 

  

 

—  

 

   279   (3,033)  2,970 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

  

 

(65,018

)

  

 

(145,551

)

  

 

61,389

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (58,992)  (65,018)  (145,551)
  


  


  


  


 


 


Financing activities

            

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

  

 

74,088

 

  

 

80,495

 

  

 

114,036

 

   115,401   74,687   80,185 

Repurchase of common stock

  

 

(64,817

)

  

 

(97,293

)

  

 

(359,293

)

   (178,463)  (64,817)  (97,293)

Dividends paid

  

 

(13,566

)

  

 

(13,092

)

  

 

(13,580

)

   (13,408)  (13,566)  (13,092)

(Repayments) on borrowings

  

 

(210

)

  

 

(486

)

  

 

(427

)

Repayments on borrowings

   —     (210)  (486)

Minority interest

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(2,656

)

  

 

13,957

 

   —     —     (2,656)
  


  


  


  


 


 


Net cash used in financing activities

  

 

(4,505

)

  

 

(33,032

)

  

 

(245,307

)

   (76,470)  (3,906)  (33,342)
  


  


  


  


 


 


Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  

 

11,979

 

  

 

(6,168

)

  

 

(11,657

)

   11,251   11,979   (6,168)
  


  


  


  


 


 


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

  

 

28,690

 

  

 

25,405

 

  

 

544

 

   95,872   28,690   25,405 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  

 

157,687

 

  

 

132,282

 

  

 

131,738

 

   186,377   157,687   132,282 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  

$

186,377

 

  

$

157,687

 

  

$

132,282

 

  $282,249  $186,377  $157,687 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Supplemental noncash information:

            

Shares issued in connection with an acquisition

  

$

—  

 

  

$

450

 

  

$

2,780

 

  $—    $—    $450 
  


  


  


  


 


 


 

See accompanying notes.

 

36

37


AUTODESK, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

Common stock

and additional

paid-in capital


   

Comprehensive income


   

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)


   

Deferred compensation


  

Retained earnings


   

Total stockholders’ equity


 
 

Shares


  

Amount


        

Common stock

and additional

paid-in capital


 Comprehensive
income


  

Accumulated

other

comprehensive

income (loss)


  

Deferred

compensation


  

Retained

earnings


  

Total

stockholders’

equity


 
 

(in thousands)

   Shares

 Amount

 

Balances, January 31, 2000

 

118,481

 

 

$

561,814

 

     

$

(14,822

)

  

$

(1,338

)

 

$

56,645

 

  

$

602,299

 

Common shares issued under stock option and stock purchase plans

 

9,236

 

 

 

114,036

 

             

 

114,036

 

Tax effect of stock plans

   

 

21,055

 

             

 

21,055

 

Shares issued in connection with an acquisition

 

156

 

 

 

2,780

 

             

 

2,780

 

Compensation expense related to stock options

   

 

260

 

        

 

166

 

    

 

426

 

Comprehensive income:

                  

Net income

      

$

93,233

 

       

 

93,233

 

  

 

93,233

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

                  

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments

      

 

3,727

 

           

Foreign currency translation adjustment

      

 

(5,009

)

           
      


           

Other comprehensive income

      

 

(1,282

)

  

 

(1,282

)

       

 

(1,282

)

      


           

Comprehensive income

      

$

91,951

 

           
      


           

Dividends paid

   

 

(2,053

)

          

 

(11,527

)

  

 

(13,580

)

Repurchase and retirement of common shares

 

(18,445

)

 

 

(273,240

)

          

 

(86,053

)

  

 

(359,293

)

 

 


     


  


 


  


  (in thousands) 

Balances, January 31, 2001

 

109,428

 

 

 

424,652

 

     

 

(16,104

)

  

 

(1,172

)

 

 

52,298

 

  

 

459,674

 

  109,428  $424,652  $(16,104) $(1,172) $52,298  $459,674 

Common shares issued under stock option and stock purchase plans

 

7,099

 

 

 

80,185

 

             

 

80,185

 

  7,099   80,185   80,185 

Tax effect of stock plans

   

 

12,176

 

             

 

12,176

 

    12,176   12,176 

Shares issued in connection with an acquisition

 

23

 

 

 

450

 

             

 

450

 

  23   450   450 

Compensation expense related to stock options

   

 

310

 

        

 

459

 

    

 

769

 

    310   459   769 

Comprehensive income:

                     

Net income

      

$

90,313

 

       

 

90,313

 

  

 

90,313

 

   $90,313   90,313   90,313 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

                     

Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments

      

 

(111

)

           

Change in unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments

    (111) 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

      

 

(3,757

)

               (3,757) 
      


              


 

Other comprehensive income

      

 

(3,868

)

  

 

(3,868

)

       

 

(3,868

)

    (3,868)  (3,868)  (3,868)
      


              


 

Comprehensive income

      

$

86,445

 

              $86,445  
      


              


 

Dividends paid

              

 

(13,092

)

  

 

(13,092

)

    (13,092)  (13,092)

Repurchase and retirement of common shares

 

(5,263

)

 

 

(59,638

)

          

 

(37,655

)

  

 

(97,293

)

  (5,263)  (59,638)  (37,655)  (97,293)
 

 


     


  


 


  


  

 


 


 


 


 


Balances, January 31, 2002

 

111,287

 

 

 

458,135

 

     

 

(19,972

)

  

 

(713

)

 

 

91,864

 

  

 

529,314

 

  111,287   458,135   (19,972)  (713)  91,864   529,314 

Common shares issued under stock option and stock purchase plans

 

5,384

 

 

 

74,687

 

             

 

74,687

 

  5,384   74,687   74,687 

Options assumed in connection with an acquisition

   

 

5,353

 

        

 

(4,556

)

    

 

797

 

    5,353   (4,556)  797 

Compensation expense related to stock options

   

 

(599

)

        

 

3,084

 

    

 

2,485

 

    (599)  3,084   2,485 

Comprehensive income:

                     

Net income

      

$

31,904

 

       

 

31,904

 

  

 

31,904

 

   $31,904   31,904   31,904 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

                     

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments

      

 

753

 

           

Change in unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments

    753  

Foreign currency translation adjustment

      

 

7,651

 

               7,651  
      


              


 

Other comprehensive income

      

 

8,404

 

  

 

8,404

 

       

 

8,404

 

    8,404   8,404   8,404 
      


              


 

Comprehensive income

      

$

40,308

 

              $40,308  
      


              


 

Dividends paid

              

 

(13,566

)

  

 

(13,566

)

    (13,566)  (13,566)

Repurchase and retirement of common shares

 

(4,407

)

 

 

(57,702

)

          

 

(7,115

)

  

 

(64,817

)

  (4,407)  (57,702)  (7,115)  (64,817)
 

 


     


  


 


  


  

 


 


 


 


 


Balances, January 31, 2003

 

112,264

 

 

$

479,874

 

     

$

(11,568

)

  

$

(2,185

)

 

$

103,087

 

  

$

569,208

 

  112,264   479,874   (11,568)  (2,185)  103,087   569,208 

Common shares issued under stock option and stock purchase plans

  8,517   115,401   115,401 

Compensation expense related to stock options

    41   1,734   1,775 

Comprehensive income:

   

Net income

   $120,316   120,316   120,316 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

   

Change in unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities

    (1,460) 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

    8,274  
 

 


     


  


 


  


   


 

Other comprehensive income

    6,814   6,814   6,814 
   


 

Comprehensive income

   $127,130  
   


 

Dividends paid

    (13,408)  (13,408)

Repurchase and retirement of common shares

  (9,061)  (121,643)  (56,820)  (178,463)
  

 


 


 


 


 


Balances, January 31, 2004

  111,720  $473,673  $(4,754) $(451) $153,175  $621,643 
  

 


 


 


 


 


 

See accompanying notes.

 

37

38


AUTODESK, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

January 31, 20032004

 

Note 1. Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Business

 

Autodesk, Inc. (“Autodesk” or “the Company”) is one of the world’s leading design software and digital content companies, foroffering customers involvedprogressive business solutions through powerful technology products and services. The Company helps customers in the building, design, civil engineering, manufacturing, utilities, telecommunications andinfrastructure, digital media, and entertainment.wireless data services fields increase the value of their digital design data and improve efficiencies across their entire project lifecycle management processes. Autodesk provides a broad range of integrated and interoperable design software, Internet services, wireless development platforms and point-of-location applications that empower more than five millionmillions of users. Autodesk software products are sold in over 160 countries, both directly to customers and through a network of resellers and distributors.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Autodesk and its wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The equity method of accounting is used for investments in companies in which Autodesk has significant influence, which is generally represented by stock ownership of at least 20 percent20% but not more than 50 percent.50%. During the fiscal yearyears ended January 31, 2004 and 2003, Autodesk no longer had any investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting. For additional information regarding investments accounted for under the equity method in fiscal year 2002, see Note 10, Business Combinations.“Business Combinations”.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in Autodesk’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. On a regular basis, management evaluates these estimates and assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates.

 

Significant estimates and assumptions made by management involve the establishment of provisions for bad debts, product returns, the determination of the fair value of stock awards to employees for purposes of the pro forma disclosures in Note 1, Employee Stock Compensation, and Note 9, Stock“Stock Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans,Plans”, realizability of deferred tax assets and long-lived assets, goodwill valuation, legal settlement reserves and the adequacy of office closure and employee termination related restructuring accruals.

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

The assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated from their respective functional currencies into U.S. dollars at the rates in effect at the balance sheet date, and revenue and expense amounts are translated at weighted average rates during the period. Foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded as other comprehensive income.

 

Gains and losses realized from foreign currency transactions, those transactions denominated in currencies other than the subsidiary’s functional currency, are included in interest and other income, as described in Note 12, Interest and Other Income.income. These amounts are immaterial.

 

Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts (“Forwards”) and Option Contracts (“Options”)

 

Autodesk hedges a portion of its European, Asian and Canadian currency exposures in certain receivables and payables as well as certain anticipated cash flows denominated in foreign currencies using forwards and options.

38


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

These foreign currency instruments by policy have maturities of less than three months and settle before the end of each quarterly period.

 

During fiscal 2001 gains and losses associated39


In accordance with exchange rate fluctuations on forwards and options were recorded in interest and other income and offset corresponding gains and losses on the underlying assets, liabilities and anticipated cash flows being hedged.

At the start of fiscal 2002 Autodesk adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”), which required Autodesk to recognizerecognizes all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. Gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value are accounted for depending upon the use of the derivative and whether it is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting under SFAS 133.

 

The costs of forwards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the contract to interest and other income, while option premiums are expensed entirely onwithin the date of purchasequarter because of the short-term life of the options.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Autodesk considers all highly liquid investments with insignificant interest rate risk and original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.

 

Marketable Securities

 

Marketable securities are stated at fair value. Marketable securities maturing within one year that are not restricted are classified as current assets.

 

Autodesk determines the appropriate classification of its marketable securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such classification as of each balance sheet date. Autodesk has classifiedclassifies all of its marketable securities as available-for-sale and carries such securities at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in stockholders’ equity until disposition or maturity.

 

Accounts Receivable, Net

 

Accounts receivable, net consisted of the following as of January 31:

 

  

2003


   

2002


   2004

 2003

 
  

(in thousands)

   (In thousands) 

Trade accounts receivable

  

$

161,792

 

  

$

174,224

 

  $201,251  $165,880 

Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts

  

 

(9,192

)

  

 

(13,181

)

   (9,654)  (9,192)

Less: Product returns reserve

  

 

(19,797

)

  

 

(20,578

)

Less: Product returns and price adjustment reserves

   (24,781)  (23,885)
  


  


  


 


  

$

132,803

 

  

$

140,465

 

  $166,816  $132,803 
  


  


  


 


 

Concentration of Credit Risk

 

Autodesk places its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities with and in the custody of financial institutions with high credit standing and, by policy, limits the amounts invested with any one institution, type of security and issuer.

39


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Autodesk’s accounts receivable are derived from sales to a large number of direct customers, resellers and distributors in the Americas, Europe and the Asia Pacific region. Autodesk performs ongoing evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and limits the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary, but generally requires no collateral. No single customer accounted for more than 10 percent10% of consolidated net revenues or accounts receivable in fiscal 2004, 2003 2002 or 2001.2002.

 

Allowances for uncollectible trade receivables are based upon historical loss patterns, the number of days that billings are past due and an evaluation of the potential risk of loss associated with specific problem accounts.

 

Inventories

 

Inventories consisted of the following as of January 31:

 

  

2003


  

2002


  2004

  2003

  

(in thousands)

  (in thousands)

Raw materials and finished goods

  

$

9,851

  

$

14,511

  $13,875  $9,851

Demonstration inventory, net

  

 

2,433

  

 

3,488

   3,490   2,433
  

  

  

  

  

$

12,284

  

$

17,999

  $17,365   $12,284
  

  

  

  

 

40


Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost (determined on the first-in, first-out method) or market. Appropriate consideration is given to excess and obsolete inventory levels in evaluating lower of cost or market.

 

Computer Equipment, Software, Furniture and Leasehold Improvements

 

Computer equipment, software and furniture are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from two to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the lease term. Depreciation expense was $34.3 million in fiscal 2004, $31.6 million in fiscal 2003 and $26.3 million in fiscal 2002 and $26.2 million in fiscal 2001.2002.

 

Costs incurred for computer software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized for application development activities and immediately expensed for preliminary project activities and post-implementation activities.

 

Purchased Technologies and Capitalized Software

 

Costs incurred in the initial design phase of software development are expensed as incurred. Once the point of technological feasibility is reached, production costs (programming and testing) are capitalized. Certain acquired software-technology rights are also capitalized. Capitalized software costs are amortized ratably, asusing the ratio of current gross revenues are recognized,for a product to the total of current and anticipated future gross revenues for that product, but not less than on a straight-line basis over 18-monththe estimated economic life of the product, which range from 12 months to seven-year periods.seven years. Amortization expense, which is included as a component of cost of revenues, was $15.5 million in fiscal 2004, $16.9 million in fiscal 2003 and $15.7 million in fiscal 2002 and $16.1 million in fiscal 2001. The actual lives of Autodesk’s purchased technologies or capitalized software may be less than management’s initial estimates.2002.

 

Purchased technologies and capitalized software and the related accumulated amortization at January 31 were as follows:follows (in thousands):

 

   

2003


   

2002


 
   

(In thousands)

 

Purchased technologies

  

$

133,029

 

  

$

108,949

 

Capitalized software

  

 

18,444

 

  

 

14,844

 

   


  


   

 

151,473

 

  

 

123,793

 

Less: Accumulated amortization

  

 

(121,348

)

  

 

(104,457

)

   


  


Purchased technologies and capitalized software, net

  

$

30,125

 

  

$

19,336

 

   


  


40


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   2004

  2003

 

Purchased technologies

  $133,041  $133,029 

Capitalized software

   20,875   18,444 
   


 


    153,916   151,473 

Less: Accumulated amortization

   (134,538)  (121,348)
   


 


Purchased technologies and capitalized software, net

  $19,378  $30,125 
   


 


 

Expected future amortization expense for purchased technologies and capitalized software for each of the fiscal years ended through January 31, 20082009 is as follows (in thousands):

 

Year ending January 31,


      

2004

  

$

13,030

2005

  

 

11,849

  $13,488

2006

  

 

3,851

   3,369

2007

  

 

912

   927

2008

  

 

483

   912

2009

   682
  

  

Total

  

$

30,125

  $19,378
  

  

 

Goodwill

 

On February 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). Therefore, Autodesk no longer amortizes goodwill andbut instead tests it for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or more often if and when circumstances indicate that goodwill may not be recoverable. There was no impairment of goodwill during the year ended January 31, 2003.2004. Goodwill amortization expense was $19.9 million in fiscal 2002 and $24.3 million in fiscal 2001.2002.

 

41


The following table sets forth Autodesk’s net income and per share amounts had the provisions of SFAS 142 been in effect during the fiscal yearsyear ended January 31, 2002 and 2001.2002.

 

   

Fiscal year ended


   

2003


  

2002


  

2001


   

(In thousands, except per share data)

Net income as reported

  

$

31,904

  

$

90,313

  

$

93,233

Add back amortization of goodwill, net of tax

  

 

—  

  

 

13,912

  

 

16,525

   

  

  

Adjusted net income

  

$

31,904

  

$

104,225

  

$

109,758

   

  

  

Basic net income per share—as reported

  

$

0.28

  

$

0.83

  

$

0.82

   

  

  

Basic net income per share—pro forma

  

$

0.28

  

$

0.96

  

$

0.96

   

  

  

Diluted net income per share—as reported

  

$

0.28

  

$

0.80

  

$

0.80

   

  

  

Diluted net income per share—pro forma

  

$

0.28

  

$

0.93

  

$

0.94

   

  

  

(In thousands, except per share amounts)  Fiscal year ended
2002


Net income as reported

  $90,313

Add back amortization of goodwill, net of tax

   13,912
   

Adjusted net income

  $104,225
   

Basic net income per share – as reported

  $0.83
   

Basic net income per share – pro forma

  $0.96
   

Diluted net income per share – as reported

  $0.80
   

Diluted net income per share – pro forma

  $0.93
   

 

41


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

At January 31, 2004 all of the goodwill associated with fiscal year 2004 acquisitions was allocated to the Design Solutions segment. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the two years ended January 31, 20032004 are as follows:follows (in thousands):

 

  

Design Solutions


   

Discreet


   

Total


 
  

(In thousands)

 

Balance as of January 31, 2001

  

$

51,625

 

  

$

2,648

 

  

$

54,273

 

Media 100 acquisition goodwill

  

 

—  

 

  

 

4,262

 

  

 

4,262

 

Goodwill from other acquisitions

  

 

3,723

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

3,723

 

Write down of goodwill

  

 

(2,310

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(2,310

)

Amortization

  

 

(19,457

)

  

 

(504

)

  

 

(19,961

)

  


  


  


  Design Solutions

 Discreet

  Total

 

Balance as of January 31, 2002

  

 

33,581

 

  

 

6,406

 

  

 

39,987

 

  $33,581  $6,406  $39,987 

Revit acquisition goodwill

  

 

107,234

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

107,234

 

   107,234   —     107,234 

CAiCE acquisition goodwill

  

 

7,546

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

7,546

 

   7,546   —     7,546 

TruEInnovations goodwill

  

 

1,178

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

1,178

 

   1,178   —     1,178 
  


  


  


  


 

  


Balance as of January 31, 2003

  

$

149,539

 

  

$

6,406

 

  

$

155,945

 

   149,539   6,406   155,945 

Linius acquisition goodwill

   978   —     978 

VIA acquisition goodwill

   3,450   —     3,450 

Other

   (279)  —     (279)
  


  


  


  


 

  


Balance as of January 31, 2004

  $153,688  $6,406  $160,094 
  


 

  


 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

Annually or sooner, as circumstances dictate, Autodesk assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the undiscounted net cash flows associated with such assets against their respective carrying values. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying value over the fair value. There was noDuring the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, Autodesk identified an impairment related to certain intangible assets related to Media 100, attributed to the Discreet Segment of Autodesk. See Note 10, “Business Combinations”, for a more detailed discussion of the Company’s long-lived assets during the year ended January 31, 2003.impairment.

 

In addition to the recoverability assessments, Autodesk routinely reviews the remaining estimated useful lives of its long-lived assets. Any reduction in the useful life assumption will result in increased depreciation and amortization expense in the quarter when such determinations are made, as well as in subsequent quarters. This situation occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 resulting in additional amortization expense of $0.3 million.

Web Site Development Costs

During the third quarter of fiscal 2001, Autodesk adopted the provisions of the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) consensus No. 00-2, “Accounting for Web Site Development Costs.” This consensus provides guidance on what types of costs associated with web site development should be capitalized or expensed. Autodesk did not capitalize any web site development costs in fiscal 2003. Autodesk capitalized web site development costs totaling $0.6 million in fiscal 2002 and $1.7 million in fiscal 2001. Such capitalized amounts are being amortized over a two-year period.

 

Deferred Tax Assets

 

Deferred tax assets arise primarily from net operating losses, tax credits, reserves and timing differences for purchased technologies and capitalized software. They are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are recorded. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

 

Investments in Privately-held Businesses

 

Autodesk has several minority investments in privately-held technology companies, many of which are in the development stage. As of January 31, 2003 and 2002, the carrying value of these investments totaled $0.6 million and $4.1 million. These investments are accounted for using the cost method of accounting because

42


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Autodesk’s ownership interest in the investees is less than 20 percent20% and Autodesk does not have the ability to exercise significant influence on the investees. The value of these investments is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Autodesk monitors these investments for impairment and makes appropriate reductions in carrying values when declines in their fair value are determined to be other-than-temporary.

 

42


During fiscal 2004, the carrying value of these investments was reduced to zero; as of January 31, 2003, the carrying value was $0.6 million.

Employee Stock Compensation

 

During December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Compensation – Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS 148”). SFAS 148 amends the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 to require more prominent disclosures in both the annual and interim financial statements aboutregarding the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The additional disclosure requirements of SFAS 148 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The Company has elected to continue to follow the intrinsic value method of accounting as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” (“APB 25”) to account for employee stock options.

 

As permitted by SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS 148, Autodesk measures compensation expense for its stock-based employee compensation plans usinghas elected to continue to follow the intrinsic value method prescribed by of accounting in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25.25”) to account for employee stock options.

 

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if Autodesk had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 as amended by SFAS 148 to stock-based employee compensation:

 

   

Fiscal year ended January 31,


 
   

2003


   

2002


   

2001


 
   

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

Net income—as reported

  

$

31,904

 

  

$

90,313

 

  

$

93,233

 

Add: Stock-based compensation cost, net of related tax effects, included in the determination of net income as reported

  

 

1,917

 

  

 

571

 

  

 

462

 

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

  

 

(48,923

)

  

 

(44,510

)

  

 

(37,265

)

   


  


  


Pro forma net income (loss)

  

$

(15,102

)

  

$

46,374

 

  

$

56,430

 

Earnings (loss) per share:

               

Basic—as reported

  

$

0.28

 

  

$

0.83

 

  

$

0.82

 

   


  


  


Basic—pro forma

  

$

(0.13

)

  

$

0.43

 

  

$

0.49

 

   


  


  


Diluted—as reported

  

$

0.28

 

  

$

0.80

 

  

$

0.80

 

   


  


  


Diluted—pro forma

  

$

(0.13

)

  

$

0.41

 

  

$

0.48

 

   


  


  


   Fiscal year ended January 31,

 
   2004

  2003

  2002

 
   (In thousands, except per share amounts) 

Net income – as reported

  $120,316  $31,904  $90,313 

Add: Stock-based employee compensation cost, net of related tax effects, included in the determination of net income as reported

   1,243   1,917   571 

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation cost determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

   (45,383)  (48,923)  (44,510)
   


 


 


Pro forma net income (loss)

  $76,176   ($15,102) $46,374 
   


 


 


Net income (loss) per share:

             

Basic – as reported

  $1.08  $0.28  $0.83 
   


 


 


Basic – pro forma

  $0.68   ($0.13) $0.43 
   


 


 


Diluted – as reported

  $1.04  $0.28  $0.80 
   


 


 


Diluted – pro forma

  $0.67   ($0.13) $0.41 
   


 


 


 

Revenue Recognition

 

Autodesk recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. Autodesk’s revenue recognition policies are in compliance with the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public

43


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Accountants’ Statement of Position 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition” (“SOP 97-2”), as amended, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.”

 

Autodesk recognizes revenue as follows.follows: Product sales, which include software licenses and theany related hardware and peripherals, are recognized at the time of shipment to our distributors, resellers and direct customers, providing all other criteria for recognition of revenue have been met. In addition to product sales, Autodesk recognizes maintenance revenues from our subscription program and hosted service revenues ratably over the contract periods. Customer consulting and training revenues are recognized as the services are performed, and revenues from post contract customer support and other related services are recognized ratably as the obligations are fulfilled, or when the related services are performed. In arrangements that include multiple software products and/or services, the Company allocates the total arrangement fee among each of the deliverables using the residual method, under which revenue is allocated to undelivered elements based on vendor specificvendor-specific objective evidence of(“VSOE”) for fair value of such undelivered elements and the residual amounts of revenue are allocated to delivered elements. VSOE is the price charged when that element is sold separately or the price as set by management with the relevant authority.

For reporting purposes, Autodesk reports revenue generated from the subscription program separately as maintenance revenue on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Revenue from all other sales types including product, consulting, training, hardware support, and hosting services, are reported as License and Other Revenue on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Revenue from the sales of our services, training and support are immaterial for all periods presented.

 

With the exception of contracts with certain distributors, sales contracts do not contain specific product-return privileges. However, Autodesk permits its distributors and resellers to return product in certain instances, generallysuch as during periods of product

43


transition and during update cycles. In addition, for certain distributors in Europe, we offer incremental discounts, or price adjustments, ranging from 1% to 4% for certain qualifying sales.

 

Autodesk establishes reserves for product returns.return and price adjustments. These reserves are based upon channel inventory levels and the timing of new product introductions, channel sell-in for applicable markets, historical experience of actual product returns and price adjustment rates and other factors. These reserves are recorded as a direct reduction of revenue and accounts receivable at the time the related revenue is recognized.

 

Shipping and Handling Costs

Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of revenues for all periods presented.

Advertising Expenses

 

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Total advertising expenses incurred were $11.7 million in fiscal 2004, $9.8 million in fiscal 2003 and $13.8 million in fiscal 2002 and $15.3 million in fiscal 2001.2002.

 

Net Income Per Share

 

Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the combination of the dilutive effect of stock options and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Autodesk has no potentially dilutive securities other than stock options.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

During November 2002In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Indebtedness to Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 andVariable Interest Entities.” FIN 46 expands upon existing accounting guidance that addresses when a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34” (“FIN 45”). FIN 45 elaborates on the existing disclosure requirements for a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees issued. It also clarifies that at the time a guarantee is issued, the guarantor must recognize an initial liability for the fair value of the obligations it assumes under the guarantee and must disclose that informationcompany should include in its financial statements.statements the assets, liabilities and activities of another entity. A variable interest entity is a corporation, partnership, trust or any other legal structure used for business purposes that either (a) does not have equity investors with voting rights or (b) has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities. FIN 46 requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity’s activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns or both. The initial recognitionconsolidation requirements of FIN 46 apply immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The consolidation requirements apply to older entities in the first fiscal year or interim period ending after December 15, 2003. Disclosure requirements apply to any financial statements issued after January 31, 2003. The adoption of this statement had no effect on Autodesk’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and measurement provisions apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issuedHedging Activities,” (“SFAS 149”). SFAS 149 amends and clarifies the accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS 149 is generally effective for contracts entered into or modified after DecemberJune 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. Adoption of SFAS 149 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity” (“SFAS 150”) which requires that certain financial instruments, which under previous guidance were accounted for as equity, must now be accounted for as liabilities. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2002,2003, and otherwise was effective at the disclosure requirements apply to guarantees outstanding as of December 31, 2002. Autodesk adopted the provisions of FIN 45 effective January 31, 2003. Somebeginning of the software licenses granted by Autodesk contain provisions that indemnify licenseesfirst interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of this statement had no effect on Autodesk’s software from damages and costs resulting from claims alleging that the Autodesk’s software infringes the intellectual property rightsconsolidated financial position, results of a third party. Autodesk has historically received only a limited

44


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

number of requests for indemnification under these provisions and has not been required to make material payments pursuant to these provisions. Accordingly, Autodesk has not recorded a liability related to these indemnification provisions.operations or cash flows.

 

Stock Split

 

On March 14, 2002, the Board of Directors authorized a two-for-one stock split in the form of a stock dividend to stockholders of record as of April 4, 2002. All references in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto with respect to the number of shares, per share amounts and market prices of Autodesk’s common stock have been restated to reflect the effect of the stock split.

 

44


Reclassifications

 

Certain reclassifications have been made to the fiscal 20022003 and 20012002 balances to conform to the 20032004 presentation. Certain funds held offshore were deemedAutodesk previously classified Information Technology and other corporate service costs that benefit the entire organization as General and Administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, Autodesk re-evaluated its cost allocation methodology and reclassified these costs to other functional areas of the business that benefit from these services. As a result, fiscal 2004 General and Administrative expenses have been reduced by management to be highly liquid in nature as opposed to short term. Accordingly, in the consolidated balance sheet, cash$46.4 million and cash equivalentsfiscal 2004 total Cost of Revenues, Marketing and Sales and Research and Development have increased and short term marketable securities correspondingly decreased by $20.9 million in fiscal 2002. In the consolidated statement of cash flows, net cash (used in) provided by investing activitiesbeen increased by $5.0$5.1 million, $23.6 million and decreased by $7.2$17.7 million, in both fiscalrespectively. This reclassification has no impact on Autodesk’s income from operations or net income. Fiscal 2003 and 2002 and 2001, respectively and cash and cash equivalents at beginningbalances have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation.

The effect of year increased by $23.1 million in 2001. In addition, the notes to thethis reclassification on previously reported consolidated financial statements have changed to reflect the changes to the related consolidated financial statements.are as follows:

   Fiscal year ended January 31,

   2003

  2002

   As previously
reported


  As reclassified

  As previously
reported


  As reclassified

   (In thousands)

Cost of revenues

  $140,162  $145,810  $151,203  $157,628

Marketing and sales

   331,721   357,667   343,508   367,930

Research and development

   172,985   190,252   168,574   185,084

General and administrative

   128,929   80,068   131,499   84,142

Income from operations

   24,962   24,962   98,174   98,174

 

Note 2. Net Income Per Share

 

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the basic and diluted net income per share amounts follows:

 

  

Fiscal year ended January 31,


  Year ended January 31,

  

2003


  

2002


  

2001


  2004

  2003

  2002

  

(In thousands)

  (In thousands)

Numerator:

                  

Numerator for basic and diluted net income per share—net income

  

$

31,904

  

$

90,313

  

$

93,233

  $120,316  $31,904  $90,313
  

  

  

  

  

  

Denominator:

                  

Denominator for basic net income per share—weighted average shares

  

 

113,035

  

 

108,815

  

 

114,375

   111,497   113,035   108,815

Effect of dilutive common stock options

  

 

1,740

  

 

3,460

  

 

2,653

   4,155   1,740   3,460
  

  

  

  

  

  

Denominator for diluted net income per share

  

 

114,775

  

 

112,275

  

 

117,028

   115,652   114,775   112,275
  

  

  

  

  

  

 

The computation of diluted net income per share does not include 19.58.2 million options for fiscal 2004, 18.7 million options for fiscal 2003 and 8.0 million options for fiscal 2002 and 11.9 million options for fiscal 2001.2002. Such options were excluded because the options had exercise prices greater than the average market prices of common stock during the respective periods and therefore were not dilutive.

45


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 3. Financial Instruments

 

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

 

Estimated fair values of financial instruments are based on quoted market prices. The carrying amounts and fair value of Autodesk’s financial instruments are as follows:

 

  

January 31, 2003


  

January 31, 2002


  January 31, 2004

  January 31, 2003

  

Cost


  

Fair value


  

Cost


  

Fair value


  Cost

  Fair value

  Cost

  Fair value

  

(In thousands)

  (In thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents

  

$

186,377

  

$

186,377

  

$

157,687

  

$

157,687

  $282,249  $282,249  $186,377  $186,377

Marketable securities

  

 

219,756

  

 

224,672

  

 

343,621

  

 

346,924

   244,729   247,251   219,756   224,672

Forward foreign currency contracts

  

 

694

  

 

694

  

 

68

  

 

68

   630   630   694   694

Foreign currency option contracts

  

 

205

  

 

205

  

 

199

  

 

199

   181   181   205   205

 

Autodesk uses derivative instruments to manage its earnings and cash flow exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Under its risk management strategy, Autodesk uses foreign currency forward and option contracts to manage its exposures of underlying assets, liabilities and other obligations, which exist as part of the ongoing business operations. These

45


foreign currency instruments by policy have maturities of less than three months and settle before the end of each quarterly period. Generally, Autodesk’s practice is to hedge a majority of its short-term foreign exchange transaction exposures. Contracts are primarily denominated in Euros,euros, Swiss francs, Canadian dollars, British pounds and Japanese yen, and Autodesk does not enter into any foreign exchange derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

 

Forwards

 

Autodesk’s forward contracts, which are not designated as hedging instruments under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” (“SFAS 133,133”), have average maturities of 90 days or less. The forwards are used to reduce the exchange rate risk associated primarily with receivables and payables. Forward contracts are marked-to-market at the end of each reporting period, with gains and losses recognized as other income or expense to offset the gains or losses resulting from the settlement of the underlying foreign currency denominated receivables and payables.

 

The notional amounts of foreign currency contracts were $26.0 million at January 31, 2004 and $32.0 million at January 31, 2003 and $45.2 million at January 31, 2002.2003. While the contract or notional amount is often used to express the volume of foreign exchange contracts, the amounts potentially subject to credit risk are generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which the counterparties’ obligations under the agreements exceed the obligations of Autodesk to the counterparties. Gains resulting from foreign currency transactions were not material in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001.

 

Options

 

In addition to the forward contracts, Autodesk utilizes foreign currency option collar contracts to reduce the exchange rate impact on the net revenue of certain anticipated transactions. These option contracts, which are designated and documented as cash flow hedges and qualify for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS 133, have maturities of less than three months and settle before the end of each fiscal quarter. For cash flow hedges, derivative gains and losses included in comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings at the time the forecasted revenue is recognized or the option expires. Autodesk’s financial exposure is generally limited to the amount paid for the options.

46


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The notional amounts of foreign currency option contracts were $42.0 million at January 31, 2004 and $36.2 million at January 31, 2003 and $41.1 million at January 31, 2002 and the critical terms were generally the same as those of the underlying exposure. Gains, if any, from the effective portion of the option contracts, as determinable under SFAS 133, are recognized as net revenues, while the ineffective portion of the option contract is recorded in interest and other income.income, net. During fiscal 2004 and 2003, there were no settlement gains recorded as net revenue. Amounts associated with net settlement losses totaling $0.8 million were recorded as other income during fiscal 2003. During fiscal 2002, Autodesk recognized net settlement gains of $0.8 millionrecorded as net revenues. Amounts associated with net settlement lossesthe cost of the options totaling $0.6$0.8 million during fiscal 2004 and $0.8 million during fiscal 2003 were recorded asin interest and other income, during fiscal 2002.net.

 

Marketable Securities

 

Marketable securities include the following available-for-sale securities at January 31, 20032004 and 2002:2003:

 

  

January 31, 2003


     January 31, 2004

   
  

Cost


  

Gross unrealized gains


  

Gross unrealized losses


   

Estimated fair value


  Cost

  

Gross

unrealized

gains


  

Gross

unrealized

losses


  

Estimated

fair value


  

(In thousands)

  (In thousands)

Short-term:

                        

Municipal Bonds

  

$

46,813

  

$

119

  

$

(10

)

  

$

46,922

  $69,894  $132  $—    $70,026

Preferred Stock

  

 

6,000

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

6,000

Money Market

  

 

7,721

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

7,721

Mutual Funds

   11,249   —     —     11,249
  

  

  


  

  

  

  

  

  

 

60,534

  

 

119

  

 

(10

)

  

 

60,643

   81,143   132   —     81,275

Long-term:

                        

Municipal Bonds

  

 

159,222

  

 

4,807

  

 

—  

 

  

 

164,029

   163,586   2,390   —     165,976
  

  

     

  

  

  

  

  

$

219,756

  

$

4,926

  

$

(10

)

  

$

224,672

  $244,729  $2,522  $—    $247,251
  

  

  


  

  

  

  

  

 

   

January 31, 2002


   

Cost


  

Gross unrealized gains


  

Gross unrealized losses


   

Estimated fair value


   

(In thousands)

Short-term:

                 

Municipal Bonds

  

$

144,285

  

$

261

  

$

(84

)

  

$

144,462

Preferred Stock

  

 

28,975

  

 

33

  

 

—  

 

  

 

29,008

Money Market

  

 

6,654

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

6,654

   

  

  


  

   

 

179,914

  

 

294

  

 

(84

)

  

 

180,124

Long-term:

                 

Municipal Bonds

  

 

163,707

  

 

3,101

  

 

(8

)

  

 

166,800

   

  

  


  

   

$

343,621

  

$

3,395

  

$

(92

)

  

$

346,924

   

  

  


  

46


      January 31, 2003

   
   Cost

  Gross
unrealized
gains


  Gross
unrealized
losses


  Estimated
fair value


   (In thousands)

Short-term:

                

Municipal Bonds

  $46,813  $119  $(10) $46,922

Preferred Stock

   6,000   —     —     6,000

Mutual Funds

   7,721   —     —     7,721
   

  

  


 

    60,534   119   (10)  60,643

Long-term:

                

Municipal Bonds

   159,222   4,807   —     164,029
   

  

  


 

   $219,756  $4,926  $(10) $224,672
   

  

  


 

The short-term mutual fund balances represent amounts held by Autodesk for deferred compensation arrangements.

 

The contractual maturities of Autodesk’s long-term marketable securities at January 31, 20032004 were as follows: $99.4$116.6 million between one and two years; $48.9$30.3 million maturing in three years; $15.7$18.0 million maturing in four to five years; and $0$1.1 million beyond five years. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay or call obligations without prepayment penalties. Realized gains on the sale of available-for-sale securities were $1.6 million in fiscal 2004, $2.1 million in fiscal 2003 and $2.8 million in fiscal 2002. Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities were immaterial in fiscal 2001. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Proceeds from the sale of marketable securities were $202.6 million in fiscal 2004, $145.9 million in fiscal 2003, and $191.0 million in fiscal 2002, and $202.2 million in fiscal 2001.

47


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

2002.

 

Note 4. Income Taxes

 

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

 

  

Fiscal year ended January 31,


   Fiscal year ended January 31,

 
  

2003


   

2002


   

2001


   2004

 2003

 2002

 
  

(In thousands)

   (In thousands) 

Federal:

            

Current

  

$

(38,377

)

  

$

9,468

 

  

$

26,350

 

  $(20,354) $(38,377) $9,468 

Deferred

  

 

42,660

 

  

 

6,735

 

  

 

289

 

   16,856   42,660   6,735 

State:

            

Current

  

 

(1,532

)

  

 

5,441

 

  

 

4,914

 

   819   (1,532)  5,441 

Deferred

  

 

(561

)

  

 

(2,507

)

  

 

(452

)

   (4,121)  (561)  (2,507)

Foreign:

            

Current

  

 

7,112

 

  

 

12,621

 

  

 

15,657

 

   11,536   7,112   12,621 

Deferred

  

 

(2,740

)

  

 

3,411

 

  

 

4,782

 

   (1,856)  (2,740)  3,411 
  


  


  


  


 


 


  

$

6,562

 

  

$

35,169

 

  

$

51,540

 

  $2,880  $6,562  $35,169 
  


  


  


  


 


 


 

The tax benefit associated with dispositions from employee stock plans did not reduce taxes currently payable in fiscal 2004 or fiscal 2003. The tax benefit associated with dispositions from employee stock plans reduced taxes currently payable by $0 million for fiscal 2003, $12.2 million for fiscal 2002 and $21.0 million for fiscal 2001.2002. Foreign pretax income was $126.7 million in fiscal 2004, $59.5 million in fiscal 2003 and $85.7 million in fiscal 2002 and $86.4 million in fiscal 2001.2002.

 

47


The principal reasons that the aggregate income tax provisions differ from the U.S. statutory rate are as follows:

 

   

Fiscal year ended January 31,


 
   

2003


   

2002


   

2001


 
   

(In thousands)

 

Income tax provision at statutory rate

  

$

13,463

 

  

$

44,342

 

  

$

56,372

 

Foreign income taxed at rates different from the U.S. statutory rate

  

 

(1,861

)

  

 

(7,449

)

  

 

(5,058

)

State income taxes, net of the federal benefit

  

 

(1,361

)

  

 

1,907

 

  

 

2,436

 

Tax-exempt interest

  

 

(2,551

)

  

 

(2,882

)

  

 

(3,526

)

Goodwill amortization

  

 

—  

 

  

 

4,308

 

  

 

4,711

 

Utilization of net operating losses not previously benefited

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(3,473

)

Research and development tax credit benefit

  

 

(2,668

)

  

 

(1,433

)

  

 

(1,162

)

Net tax benefit from closure of IRS audit

  

 

(3,824

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Non-taxable gain on disposition of unconsolidated affiliate

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(3,311

)

  

 

—  

 

Additional taxes provided on prior year foreign earnings

  

 

6,884

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Extraterritorial income exclusion/Foreign Sales Corporation tax benefit

  

 

(1,632

)

  

 

(2,690

)

  

 

(2,007

)

Other

  

 

112

 

  

 

2,377

 

  

 

3,247

 

   


  


  


   

$

6,562

 

  

$

35,169

 

  

$

51,540

 

   


  


  


48


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   Fiscal year ended January 31,

 
   2004

  2003

  2002

 
   (In thousands) 

Income tax provision at statutory rate

  $43,119  $13,463  $44,342 

Foreign income taxed at rates different from the U.S. statutory rate

   —     (1,861)  (7,449)

State income taxes, net of the federal benefit

   (2,279)  (1,361)  1,907 

Tax-exempt interest

   (1,846)  (2,551)  (2,882)

Goodwill amortization

   —     —     4,308 

Research and development tax credit benefit

   (3,968)  (2,668)  (1,433)

Net income tax benefit from resolution of the Foreign Sales Corporation issue

   (19,674)  —     —   

Net income tax benefit from closure of IRS audit

   (7,013)  (3,824)  —   

Non-taxable gain on disposition of unconsolidated affiliate

   —     —     (3,311)

Additional taxes provided on prior year foreign earnings

   —     6,884   —   

Extraterritorial income exclusion/Foreign Sales Corporation tax benefit

   (4,575)  (1,632)  (2,690)

Other

   (884)  112   2,377 
   


 


 


   $2,880  $6,562  $35,169 
   


 


 


 

Significant components of Autodesk’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

 

  

January 31,


   January 31,

 
  

2003


   

2002


   2004

 2003

 
  

(In thousands)

   (In thousands) 

Purchased technology and capitalized software

  

$

33,816

 

  

$

34,423

 

  $29,888  $33,816 

Reserves for product returns and bad debts

  

 

9,207

 

  

 

9,967

 

   7,805   9,207 

Tax loss carryforwards

  

 

43,439

 

  

 

13,022

 

   57,969   43,439 

Accrued compensation and benefits

  

 

8,252

 

  

 

6,932

 

   7,568   8,252 

Fixed assets

  

 

8,554

 

  

 

10,073

 

   8,931   8,554 

Research and development credit carryforwards

  

 

7,304

 

  

 

—  

 

   15,635   7,304 

Foreign tax credit carryforwards

  

 

6,679

 

  

 

—  

 

   11,463   6,679 

Other accruals not currently deductible for tax

  

 

14,449

 

  

 

15,239

 

   12,974   14,449 

Other

   1,408   —   
  


  


  


 


Total deferred tax assets

  

 

131,700

 

  

 

89,656

 

   153,641   131,700 

Less: valuation allowance

  

 

(11,865

)

  

 

(4,266

)

   (23,734)  (11,865)
  


  


  


 


Net deferred tax assets

  

 

119,835

 

  

 

85,390

 

   129,907   119,835 
  


  


  


 


Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries

  

 

(88,445

)

  

 

(21,323

)

   (112,346)  (88,445)

Other

  

 

(4,145

)

  

 

(3,131

)

   —     (4,145)
  


  


  


 


Total deferred tax liability

  

 

(92,590

)

  

 

(24,454

)

   (112,346)  (92,590)
  


  


  


 


Net deferred tax assets

  

$

27,245

 

  

$

60,936

 

  $17,561  $27,245 
  


  


  


 


 

The valuation allowance increased by $11.9 million in fiscal 2004 and $7.6 million in fiscal 2003, and decreased by $0.6 million in fiscal 2002 and $3.1 million in fiscal 2001. .Approximately $9.0$21.1 million of the valuation allowance at January 31, 2004 and $9.0 million at January 31, 2003 relates to tax benefits of stock option deductions for fiscal 2004 and 2003 respectively, which will be credited to equity if and when realized.

As part of the Revit Technology Corporation acquisition, the Company recorded $5.3 million of additional net deferred tax assets. See Note 10 for further discussion.

 

No provision has been made for federal income taxes on unremitted earnings of certain of Autodesk’s foreign subsidiaries (cumulatively $144.0 million at January 31, 2003)2004) because Autodesk plans to reinvest such earnings for the foreseeable future. At January 31, 2003,2004, the unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings was approximately $49.0$ 49.0 million.

 

Realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets of $27.2$17.6 million is dependent upon the Company generating approximately $70.0$46.0 million of future taxable income in appropriate tax jurisdictions to obtain benefit from the reversal of temporary differences, net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits. The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable is subject to adjustment in future periods if estimates of future taxable income are reduced.

 

Cash refunds for income taxes were approximately $19.3 million in fiscal 2004. Cash payments for income taxes were approximately $19.3 million in fiscal 2003 and $20.0 million in fiscal 2002 and $14.0 million in fiscal 2001.2002.

 

48


The Company has $121.0$164.2 million of cumulative federal tax loss carryforwards and $22.8$12.1 million of cumulative state tax loss carryforwards, which may be available to reduce future income tax liabilities in certain jurisdictions. The federal tax loss carryforwards will expire beginning January 31, 2008 through January 31,

49


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

2024. 2025. The state tax loss carryforwards will expire beginning January 31, 20042006 through January 31, 2014.2015. Autodesk has recorded a valuation allowance against some deferred tax assets including the tax benefit of certain tax loss carryforwards of acquired companies due to the uncertainty of their realizability.

 

The Company has $5.9$11.5 million of cumulative federal research tax credit carryforwards and $1.4$4.1 million of cumulative state research tax credit carryforwards, which may be available to reduce future income tax liabilities in the U.S. and California. The federal credit carryforwards will expire beginning January 31, 2019 through January 31, 2024.2025. The state credit carryforwards may reduce future California income tax liabilities indefinitely.

 

The Company also has $6.7$11.4 million of cumulative foreign tax credit carryforwards, which may be available to reduce future U.S. tax liabilities. The federal credits will expire beginning January 31, 2009.2009 through January 31, 2010.

 

As a result of certain employment actions and capital investments undertaken by Autodesk, income earned in certain countries is subject to reduced tax rates and in some cases is wholly exempt from taxes for years through fiscal 2009. The income tax benefits attributable to the tax status of these subsidiaries are estimated to be $0 in fiscal 2004, $0.4 million ($0.00 perimpact on basic net income per share) in fiscal 2003 and $4.4 million ($0.04 perimpact on basic net income per share) in fiscal 20022002.

During the fiscal year 2004, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $19.7 million due to a favorable resolution of an industry-wide matter surrounding the Company’s Foreign Sales Corporation for the fiscal years ended 1993 through 1998. In connection with the refund of these tax payments previously made, the Company received payment and $2.0recognized interest income of $4.2 million ($0.02 per basic netduring fiscal 2004.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the statute of limitations lapsed with respect to the fiscal year ended 2000. As a result of the Company’s resolution of its Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) audit and closure for that year, the Company recognized an income per share) in fiscal 2001.tax benefit of approximately $7.0 million for items dealing primarily with various international tax matters and research and development tax credits.

 

In fiscal 2003, the Company resolved its Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)IRS audit for the fiscal years ended 1997-1999, and the statute of limitations lapsed with respect to these years in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. The closure of these years resulted in a current income tax benefit of approximately $61.7 million which related primarily to various international tax matters and research and development tax credits. Also in the fourth quarter, the Company provided an additional $57.9 million in U.S. deferred income taxes on previously permanently reinvested foreign earnings to reflect a potential repatriation of such foreign earnings to meet expected U.S. cash needs, including the Company’s current stock repurchase program. The impact of these events iswas a net income tax benefit of $3.8 million.

 

Note 5. Gain on Disposal of Affiliate

 

During October 2001, the shareholders of RedSpark, Inc. (“RedSpark”) approved a plan to dissolve the company. Previously, Autodesk had maintained a majority interest in RedSpark’s voting stock since RedSpark was formed in April 2000. Accordingly, Autodesk consolidated RedSpark’s financial position and results of operations.

 

As a result of the plan to dissolve RedSpark, Autodesk recognized a one-time non-cash gain of $9.5 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2002. This gain, which resulted from the reversal of the minority interest liability balance, represents the reversal of cumulative losses recognized in excess of the amount that Autodesk originally invested.

 

Note 6. Borrowing Arrangements

 

During fiscal 2003,2004, Autodesk had a U.S. line of credit available that permitted unsecured short-term borrowings of up to $75.0$40.0 million, which could be used from time to time for working capital or other business needs. This credit facility expired in January 2003.February 2004. There were no borrowings outstanding under this agreement at the time it expired. Autodesk does not plan to renew this credit facility.

 

In February 2003, Autodesk entered into a U.S. line of credit agreement that permits short-term unsecured borrowings of up to $40.0 million, which may be used from time to time for working capital or other business

5049


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

needs. This credit facility, which expires in February 2004, contains restrictive covenants that, among other provisions, require Autodesk to maintain certain financial ratios.

Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Leases

 

Autodesk leases office space and computer equipment under noncancelable operating lease agreements. The leases generally provide that Autodesk pay taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses related to the leased assets. Future minimum lease payments for fiscal years ended January 31 are as follows (in millions):

 

2004

  

$

37.8

 

2005

  

 

33.3

 

  $38.6 

2006

  

 

21.5

 

   29.0 

2007

  

 

13.1

 

   16.4 

2008

  

 

7.5

 

   9.4 

2009

   5.0 

Thereafter

  

 

28.1

 

   22.5 
  


  


  

$

141.3

 

   120.9 

Less: Sublease income

  

 

(6.2

)

   (8.5)
  


  


  

$

135.1

 

  $112.4 
  


  


 

Of these amounts, $10.2 million$7.7million has been included in our restructuring accruals at January 31, 2003.2004. Rent expense was $33.5 million in fiscal 2004, $41.1 million in fiscal 2003 and $40.9 million in fiscal 2002 and $31.8 million in fiscal 2001.2002.

 

Guarantees and Indemnifications

 

In the normal course of business, Autodesk adopted the provisionsprovides indemnifications of FIN 45 effective January 31, 2003. SeeRecently Issued Accounting Standards in Note 1. Somevarying scopes to customers against claims of the software licenses granted by Autodesk contain provisions that indemnify licensees of Autodesk’s software from damages and costs resulting from claims alleging that Autodesk’s software infringes the intellectual property rightsinfringement made by third parties arising from the use of its products and certain guarantees, including limited product warranties. Autodesk accrues for known indemnification and warranty issues if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. Historically, costs related to these warranties and indemnifications have not been significant, and because potential future costs are highly variable, Autodesk is unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these guarantees on its future results of operations.

In connection with the sale or license to third party.parties of assets or businesses, Autodesk has historically received only a limited numberentered into customary indemnity agreements related to the assets or businesses sold or licensed. Historically, costs related to these guarantees have not been significant, but because potential future costs are highly variable, Autodesk is unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of requeststhese guarantees on its future results of operations.

As permitted under Delaware law, Autodesk has agreements whereby it indemnifies its officers and directors for indemnification under these provisions and has not beencertain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was, serving at Autodesk’s request in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments Autodesk could be required to make material payments pursuant tounder these provisions. Accordingly,indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, Autodesk has not recordeddirector and officer insurance coverage that reduces its exposure and would generally enable Autodesk to recover a liability related toportion of any future amounts paid. Autodesk believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification provisions.agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

On December 27, 2001, Spatial Corp. (“Spatial”) filed suit in Marin County Superior Court against Autodesk whichand D-Cubed Ltd. (“D-Cubed”), seeking among other things, seekstermination of a declaration that Autodesk had breached a ten year old development agreement between Spatial and Autodesk and an injunction preventing Autodesk from disclosing source code licensed fromworking with contractors under the development agreement. On October 2, 2003, a jury found that Autodesk did not breach the development agreement. Spatial to third parties. The Complaint was later amended to seekfiled a remedynotice of preventing Autodesk from distributingappeal on December 2, 2003, appealing the licensed code to end users.

Autodesk believes that Spatial’s claims are without merit, and is contesting them vigorously. Althoughdecision of the results of litigation are inherently uncertain,jury. Autodesk believes that the ultimate resolution of this matter will not have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, if Spatial were to prevail at trial on its request to terminate the perpetual license to the code, and Autodesk could not obtain a license on acceptable terms or license or develop a substitute technology, our business and operating results could be materially adversely affected. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, Autodesk recorded a $2.5 million reserve related to this matter.

 

51


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

On October 7, 2002, Digimation Inc. filed a demand for arbitration against Autodesk with the American Arbitration Association alleging breach of contract and interference with prospective economic advantage and business relations. We believe that Digimation’s claims are without merit and that the ultimate resolution of this matter will not have material effect on our consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Additionally,Generally, Autodesk is involved in various legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business activities. In management’sits opinion, resolution of thesepending matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on Autodesk’sits consolidated results of operations, cash flows or its financial position. However, depending on the amount and timing,it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of a matter could materially affect Autodesk’sthe future results of operations, cash flows or financial position in a particular period.

50


Note 8. Stockholders’ Equity

 

Preferred Stock

 

Under Autodesk’s Certificate of Incorporation, 2.0 million shares of preferred stock are authorized. At January 31, 2003,2004, there were no preferred shares issued or outstanding. The Board of Directors has the authority to issue the preferred stock in one or more series and to fix rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including dividends, and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of such series, without any further vote or action by the stockholders.

 

In December 1995, the Board of Directors approved a Preferred Shares Rights Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”). The Rights Agreement is intended to protect stockholders’ rights in the event of an unsolicited takeover attempt. It is not intended to prevent a takeover of the Company on terms that are favorable and fair to all stockholders and will not interfere with a merger approved by the Board of Directors. Each right entitles stockholders to buy1/1000 of a share of preferred stock at an exercise price of $100, subject to further adjustment. The rights will become exercisable for half-priced common stock if a person or group acquires or announces a tender offer or exchange offer to acquire 15 percent15% or more of the Company’s common stock. The rights will expire no later than December 14, 2005.

 

Common Stock Repurchase Programs

 

Autodesk repurchased and retired 9.1 million shares in fiscal 2004 at an average repurchase price of $19.69 per share, 4.4 million shares in fiscal 2003 at an average repurchase price of $14.71 per share and 5.3 million shares in fiscal 2002 at an average repurchase price of $18.49 per share and 18.4 million shares in fiscal 2001 at an average repurchase price of $19.48 per share. The purpose of the stock repurchase program is, among other things, to help offset the dilution to earnings per share caused by the issuance of stock under Autodesk’s employee stock plans.

 

Between November 1999 and March 2001,December 2003, the Board of Directors approved plans to repurchase a totalup to 60.0 million shares of 44.0 millionour common shares.stock. Of these 44.060.0 million shares, 33.942.9 million shares were repurchased and retired as of January 31, 2003.2004. The number of shares acquired and the timing of the purchases are based on several factors, including general market conditions and the trading price of Autodesk common stock.

 

In fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, Autodesk repurchased its common stock through open market purchases. In fiscal 2001 Autodesk repurchased its common stock through a combination of open market purchases and settlement of equity collar contracts.

52


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Dividends

 

During fiscal 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002 Autodesk paid annual cash dividends of $0.12 per share at a rate of $0.03 each quarter.quarter, reducing retained earnings by $13.4 million, $13.6 million, and $13.1 million, respectively.

 

Note 9. Stock Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans

 

Stock Option Plans

 

Autodesk maintains three active stock option plans for the purpose of granting stock options to employees and members of Autodesk’s Board of Directors: the 1996 Stock Plan, the Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan and the 2000 Directors’ Option Plan. Additionally, there are five expired plans with options outstanding.

 

Autodesk’s continued growth and success is dependent upon its ability to attract and retain highly skilled employees. Competition for these employees in the marketplace, especially in the technology industries, has historically been intense. As such, Autodesk uses stock option awards as one means of attracting and retaining highly skilled employees.

 

The 1996 Stock Plan, which was approved by stockholders, allows for options to be granted to employees, including officers. At January 31, 2003, 8.82004, 9.5 million shares were available for future issuance. This amount will automatically be increased on the first trading day of each fiscal year by an amount equal to the lesser of 10.0 million shares or 3.5 percent3.5% of the total of (1) outstanding shares plus (2) any shares repurchased by Autodesk during the prior fiscal year. The plan expires duringin calendar 2006.

 

In 1996, Autodesk adopted the Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan andwhich allows for options to be granted to employees and consultants. Officers and members of Autodesk’s Board of Directors are not eligible to participate in this plan. Autodesk does not have a practice of awarding stock options to consultants. This plan was not subject to stockholder approval. At January 31, 2003, 0.22004, 0.1 million shares were available for future issuance.

 

The 2000 Directors’ Option Plan, which was approved by the stockholders, allows for an automatic annual grant of options to members of Autodesk’s outside Board of Directors. At January 31, 2003, 0.52004, 0.3 million shares were available for future issuance.

 

51


Options granted under the above mentioned plans vest over periods ranging from one to five years and generally expire within ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price of the stock options is generally equal to the fair market value of the stock on the grant date.

 

53


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

A summary of stock option activity is as follows:

 

  

Number of shares


   

Weighted average price per share


  

(Shares in thousands)

  Number of
shares


 Weighted
average
price per
share


Options outstanding at January 31, 2000

  

31,834

 

  

$

15.24

Granted

  

8,910

 

  

 

16.00

Exercised

  

(7,392

)

  

 

13.05

Canceled

  

(6,354

)

  

 

16.87

  

     (Shares in thousands)

Options outstanding at January 31, 2001

  

26,998

 

  

$

15.72

  26,998  $15.72

Granted

  

8,724

 

  

 

16.77

  8,724   16.77

Exercised

  

(5,017

)

  

 

12.62

  (5,017)  12.62

Canceled

  

(1,541

)

  

 

17.42

  (1,541)  17.42
  

     

 

Options outstanding at January 31, 2002

  

29,164

 

  

$

16.50

  29,164  $16.50

Granted

  

7,356

 

  

 

15.41

  7,356   15.41

Options assumed in an acquisition

  

255

 

  

 

1.51

Options assumed in acquisitions

  255   1.51

Exercised

  

(3,428

)

  

 

14.42

  (3,428)  14.42

Canceled

  

(3,902

)

  

 

17.64

  (3,902)  17.64
  

     

 

Options outstanding at January 31, 2003

  

29,445

 

  

 

16.19

  29,445  $16.19

Options exercisable at January 31, 2003

  

14,710

 

  

 

16.67

Options available for grant at January 31, 2003

  

9,557

 

   

Granted

  6,460   17.46

Exercised

  (6,425)  14.48

Canceled

  (3,012)  17.13

Options outstanding at January 31, 2004

  26,468  $16.80

Options exercisable at January 31, 2004

  13,253   17.00

Options available for grant at January 31, 2004

  9,947  

 

The following table summarizes information about options outstanding and exercisable at January 31, 2003:2004:

 

   

Options Exercisable


  

Options Outstanding


   

Number of shares (in thousands)


  

Weighted average exercise price


  

Number of shares (in thousands)


    

Weighted average contractual life (in years)


  

Weighted average exercise price


Range of per share exercise prices:

                   

$ 0.01 – 12.72

  

3,908

  

$

11.49

  

7,920

    

7.5

  

$

11.35

$ 12.84 – 16.28

  

3,017

  

 

14.89

  

7,508

    

7.6

  

 

14.93

$ 16.50 – 19.03

  

4,231

  

 

17.69

  

7,777

    

7.5

  

 

17.63

$ 19.13 – 36.75

  

3,554

  

 

22.68

  

6,240

    

6.7

  

 

22.06

   
  

  
    
  

   

14,710

  

$

16.67

  

29,445

    

7.3

  

$

16.19

   Options Exercisable

  Options Outstanding

   Number of
shares (in
thousands)


  Weighted
average
exercise
price


  Number of
shares (in
thousands)


  Weighted
average
contractual
life (in
years)


  Weighted
average
exercise
price


Range of per share exercise prices:

                 

$   0.08 – 14.60

  3,770  $11.89  6,971  6.7  $12.22

$ 14.61 – 16.28

  2,065   15.49  6,487  8.0   15.25

$ 16.50 – 19.20

  3,939   17.73  6,159  6.8   17.67

$ 19.31 – 36.75

  3,479   22.61  6,851  6.3   22.13
   
  

  
  
  

   13,253  $17.00  26,468  6.9  $16.80

 

These options will expire if not exercised at specific dates ranging through January 2013.2014.

 

A total of 44.141.8 million shares of Autodesk’s common stock have been reserved for future issuance under existing stock option and stock purchase programs.

 

1998 Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan

 

Under Autodesk’s employee qualified stock purchase plan, which was approved by stockholders in 1998, eligible employees may purchase shares of Autodesk’s common stock at their discretion using up to 15 percent15% of their compensation subject to certain limitations, at not less than 85 percent85% of fair market value as defined in

54


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

the plan agreement. At January 31, 2003,2004, a total of 5.15.4 million shares were available for future issuance. This amount will automatically be increased on the first trading day of each fiscal year by an amount equal to the lesser of 5.0 million shares or 2.0 percent2.0% of the total of (1) outstanding shares plus (2) any shares repurchased by Autodesk during the prior fiscal year. Autodesk issued 2.1 million shares at an average price of $10.96 per share in fiscal 2004, 2.0 million shares at an average price of $11.55 per share in fiscal 2003, and 2.1 million shares at an average price of $9.43 per share in fiscal 2002, and 1.9 million shares at an average price of $9.14 in fiscal 2001.2002. The provisions of this plan expire during 2018.

 

52


Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following table summarizes the number of outstanding options granted to employees and directors, as well as the number of securities remaining available for future issuance, under these plans (number of securities in thousands) as of January 31, 2003.2004.

 

     

(a)

    

(b)

    

(c)

 

Plan category


    

Number of securities

to be issued upon

exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights


    

Weighted-average

exercise price of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights


    

Number of securities remaining

available for future issuance

under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))


 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)

    

19,456

    

$

16.10

    

14,380

(2)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (3)

    

9,989

    

$

16.40

    

217

 

     
    

    

Total

    

29,445

    

$

16.19

    

14,597

 


   (a)  (b)  (c) 

Plan category


  

Number of securities

to be issued upon

exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights


  

Weighted-average

exercise price of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights


  

Number of securities remaining

available for future issuance

under equity compensation plans

(excluding securities reflected

in column (a))


 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

  19,269  $16.85  15,213(2)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(3)

  7,199  $16.66  109 
   
  

  

Total

  26,468  $16.80  15,322 

(1)Included in these amounts are 0.40.3 million securities available to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options with a weighted-average exercise price of $16.14$15.94 related to equity compensation plans assumed in connection with previous business mergers and acquisitions.

(2)Included in this amount are 5.15.4 million securities available for future issuance under Autodesk’s 1998 Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan.

(3)Amounts correspond to Autodesk’s Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, which is not subject to stockholder approval.

 

Pro Forma Net Income (Loss) Information

 

Autodesk applies APB 25 in accounting for its employee stock plans. Accordingly, no compensation expense is recognized in Autodesk’s consolidated statementstatements of operations,income, other than for stock awards that have exercise prices less than the fair market value of Autodesk’s common stock at the date of grant.

 

For purposes of disclosures pursuant to SFAS 123 as amended by SFAS 148, the estimated fair value of options is amortized to expense over the options’ vesting period. Refer to Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for further discussion.

 

The weighted average estimated fair value of stock options granted was $7.82$8.07 per share during fiscal 2004, $7.82 during fiscal 2003 and $8.93 during fiscal 2002 and $8.75 during fiscal 2001.2002. These were estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, based on the following assumptions:

 

  

2003


  

2002


  

2001


  2004

 2003

 2002

 

Volatility

  

0.6

  

0.6

  

0.6

  0.6  0.6  0.6 

Weighted-average estimated life

  

5 years

  

5 years

  

5 years

  5 years  5 years  5 years 

Weighted-average risk-free interest rate

  

3.0 percent

  

4.8 percent

  

5.7 percent

  3.2% 3.0% 4.8%

Dividend yield

  

0.8 percent

  

0.7 percent

  

0.8 percent

  0.7% 0.8% 0.7%

The weighted average estimated fair value of shares granted under the employee qualified stock purchase plan was $3.93 per
share during fiscal 2004, $4.81 during fiscal 2003 and $4.14 during fiscal 2002. These were estimated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model, based on the following assumptions:

The weighted average estimated fair value of shares granted under the employee qualified stock purchase plan was $3.93 per
share during fiscal 2004, $4.81 during fiscal 2003 and $4.14 during fiscal 2002. These were estimated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model, based on the following assumptions:

 
  2004

 2003

 2002

 

Volatility

  0.5  0.5  0.6 

Weighted-average estimated life

  0.5 years  0.5 years  0.5 years 

Weighted-average risk-free interest rate

  1.2% 2.1% 3.3%

Dividend yield

  0.7% 0.8% 0.7%

 

5553


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The weighted average estimated fair value of shares granted under the employee qualified stock purchase plan was $4.81 per share during fiscal 2003, $4.14 during fiscal 2002 and $4.29 during fiscal 2001. These were estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, based on the following assumptions:

   

2003


  

2002


  

2001


Volatility

  

0.5

  

0.6

  

0.7

Weighted-average estimated life

  

0.5 years

  

0.5 years

  

0.5 years

Weighted-average risk-free interest rate

  

2.1 percent

  

3.3 percent

  

5.3 percent

Dividend yield

  

0.8 percent

  

0.7 percent

  

0.8 percent

Pretax Savings Plan

 

Autodesk has a 401(k) plan that covers nearly all U.S. employees. Eligible employees may contribute up to 20 percent20% of their pretax salary, subject to limitations mandated by the Internal Revenue Service. Autodesk makes voluntary cash contributions and matches a portion of employee contributions in cash. Autodesk’s contributions were $6.2 million in fiscal 2004, $6.3 million in fiscal 2003 and $5.8 million in fiscal 2002 and $5.0 million in fiscal 2001.2002. Autodesk does not allow participants to invest in Autodesk common stock through the 401(k) plan.

 

Autodesk provides defined-contribution plans in certain foreign countries where required by statute. Autodesk’s funding policy for foreign defined-contribution plans is consistent with the local requirements in each country. Autodesk’s contributions to these plans were $4.4 million in fiscal 2004, $4.2 million in fiscal 2003 and $4.4 million in fiscal 2002 and $2.8 million in fiscal 2001.2002.

 

Note 10. Business Combinations

 

The following acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase methodStatement of accounting and, accordingly,Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations (“SFAS 141”). Accordingly, the results of operations of each acquisition are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income since the acquisition date, and the related assets and liabilities were recorded based upon their relative fair values at the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented for any of the acquisitions, except the Buzzsaw acquisition, because the effects of these acquisitions were not significant to Autodesk on either an individual or an aggregate basis.

 

VIA Development Corporation (“VIA”)

In March 2003, Autodesk acquired certain assets of VIA for approximately $4.2 million in cash. This acquisition provides Autodesk with electrical schematics, wire diagram, and controls engineering automation technology. Autodesk allocated the purchase consideration to the following intangible assets, which are deductible for tax purposes: $0.7 million to purchased technology and $3.5 million to goodwill. The purchased technology is being amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of 2 years. The goodwill was assigned to the Manufacturing Solutions Division of the Design Solutions Segment.

Linius Technologies, Inc. (“Linius”)

In February 2003, Autodesk acquired certain assets of Linius for approximately $1.0 million in cash. In addition, Autodesk assumed approximately $0.2 million in liabilities. This acquisition provides Autodesk with software that allows a wire harness designer to create 3D prototypes. Autodesk allocated the purchase consideration to the following intangible assets, which are deductible for tax purposes: $0.2 million to purchased technology and $1.0 million to goodwill. The purchased technology is being amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of 3 years. The goodwill was assigned to the Manufacturing Solutions Division of the Design Solutions Segment.

truEInnovations

 

In December 2002, Autodesk acquired certain assets of truEInnovations for approximately $1.7 million in cash. This acquisition provided Autodesk accounted for this acquisition under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141”).with file and data management software that has been integrated into the Autodesk Inventor Series environment. The purchase consideration was allocated principally to purchased technology and goodwill, which are deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill was assigned to the Manufacturing Solutions Division of the Design Solutions Segment.

 

CAiCE Software Corporation (“CAiCE”)

 

In September 2002, Autodesk acquired certain assets and liabilities of CAiCE for $10.0 million in cash. This acquisition allowsallowed Autodesk to expand its presence in the transportation software market as well as enhance Autodesk’s core civil design industry business by addressing the needs of both the public and private sector engineering community.

 

5654


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to SFAS 141. Management’s allocation of the purchase consideration, which is based on valuations of acquired assets and liabilities performed by a third party, is as follows (in thousands):

 

Developed technologies (3 year useful life)

  $2,370

Other assets, net

   88

Goodwill

   7,546
   

   $10,004
   

 

The $7.5 million of goodwill, which is deductible for tax purposes, was assigned to the Infrastructure Solutions Division of Autodesk’s Design Solutions Segment. The goodwill is attributed to the premium paid for emerging civil design technology and the opportunity for enhanced revenue growth in strategic transportation markets.

 

Revit Technology Corporation (“Revit”)

 

In April 2002, Autodesk acquired the outstanding stock of Revit for a $133.0 million cash payment to Revit shareholders, the assumption of unvested Revit stock options of $5.4 million, direct transaction costs of $0.5 million and net assumed liabilities of $0.6 million for total purchase consideration of $139.5 million. The acquisition providesprovided Autodesk with complementaryparametric building information modeling technology that allows customers to create a building design as a completely integrated system.

 

The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to SFAS 141. Management’s allocation of the purchase consideration, which is based on valuations of acquired assets performed by a third party, is as follows (in thousands):

 

Fixed assets

  $921

Developed technologies (3 year useful life)

   21,200

Deferred stock-based compensation

   4,847

Deferred tax asset

   5,298

Goodwill

   107,234
   

   $139,500
   

 

The $107.2 million of goodwill, which is not deductible for tax purposes, was assigned to the Building Solutions Division of Autodesk’s Design Solutions Segment. The goodwill is attributed to the premium paid for potential next generation technology and the opportunity for enhanced revenue growth through the development and sale of integrated model based design applications for downstream use of modeling data.

 

As part of the acquisition, Autodesk granted Revit employees 0.3 million options in connection with the assumption of their outstanding unvested options. The fair value of these options of $5.4 million was added to the purchase consideration. At January 31, 20032004, the intrinsic value of the stock options, which relate to future services, totaled $1.9$0.3 million and is included in deferred compensation within stockholders’ equity.

 

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, an adjustment to the purchase price of $15.4 million was recorded in order to establish a deferred tax asset. Accordingly, goodwill was reduced by $15.4 million.

 

57


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Software Division of Media 100, Inc. (“Media 100”)

 

During October 2001, Autodesk acquired the software division of Media 100 for $16.0 million in cash. The acquisition providesprovided Autodesk with streaming media technology for, among other things, the immediate playback of content over the Internet.

 

The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to SFAS 141. Management’s allocation of the purchase price, which is based on valuations of acquired assets performed by a third party, is as follows (in thousands):

 

Inventory and computer hardware

  $558

Intangible assets and amounts:

    

Developed technologies (3 year useful life)

   7,380

Brand names (6 year useful life)

   620

In-process research and development (“IPR&D”)

   3,180

Goodwill

   4,262
   

   $16,000
   

 

55


The value assigned to IPR&D, which was expensed duringat the third quarter,time of the acquisition, was determined by identifying projects in areas where technological feasibility had not been achieved and alternative future uses did not exist.

 

The $4.3 million of goodwill, which is deductible for tax purposes, was assigned to the Discreet Segment of Autodesk. The goodwill represented the premium paid to acquire the streaming media technology, which is an integral part of future products.

 

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, as part of its annual impairment analysis, Autodesk identified a shortfall between the undiscounted cash flows and remaining net book values of developed technologies and brand names associated with Media 100. Consequently, Autodesk wrote-down the remaining net book value by $1.8 million to an amount equal to the fair value of the Media 100-based products. This charge was recorded in cost of license and other revenues for the Discreet Segment of Autodesk.

Buzzsaw.com, Inc. (“Buzzsaw”)

 

On August 20, 2001, Autodesk acquired the remaining outstanding stock of Buzzsaw it did not own for $15.0 million in cash plus the assumption of $13.3 million of liabilities. Prior to the acquisition, Autodesk held a 40 percent40% interest in Buzzsaw, a privately held company that provided leading online collaboration applications to improve efficiencies and reduce costs for the building industry. The acquisition of Buzzsaw is part of Autodesk’s strategy to extend its business to complementary new markets. Buzzsaw’s results of operations, which are not material in relation to Autodesk, have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date. Prior to the acquisition date, Autodesk accounted for its interest in Buzzsaw using the equity method of accounting.

 

58


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to SFAS 141. Management’s allocation of the purchase price, which is based on valuations of acquired assets performed by a third party, resulted in negative goodwill of approximately $11.0 million. In accordance with SFAS 141, the carrying values of Buzzsaw’s long-lived assets were reduced proportionately to the extent of the negative goodwill balance. Management’s allocation of the purchase price is as follows (in thousands):

 

Cash

  $229

Accounts receivable, net

   1,426

Prepaid and other current assets

   798

Deferred tax assets

   23,787

Deposits and other long-term assets

   730
   

Total assets

   26,970

Liabilities assumed

   13,345

Deferred revenues

   2,625
   

Total liabilities

   15,970
   

Net assets

  $11,000
   

 

The deferred tax asset represents the expected utilization of Buzzsaw’s net operating losses that Autodesk expects to realize and the tax effect of temporary differences resulting from the allocation of the purchase price.

 

The following unaudited pro forma summary is provided for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the consolidated results of operations for future periods or that actually would have been realized had Autodesk acquired the remaining 60 percent60% interest in Buzzsaw on February 1, 2000.2001.

 

The pro forma summary includes the impact of certain adjustments resulting from the allocation of the purchase consideration and reversal of the equity in net losses that Autodesk recognized.

 

     

Fiscal year ended
January 31,


     

2002


    

2001


     

(in thousands, except per share data)


Net revenues

    

$953,255

    

$

941,678

Net income

    

$76,042

    

$

85,856

Basic earnings per share

    

$0.70

    

$

0.75

Diluted earnings per share

    

$0.68

    

$

0.73

Autodesk believes that Buzzsaw’s future on-going operating losses will be significantly less than what Buzzsaw historically incurred. In an effort to reduce operating costs and expenses, Buzzsaw eliminated 141 positions (55 percent of its workforce) between January 1, 2001 and August 20, 2001. Additionally, as part of the acquisition, Autodesk closed Buzzsaw’s headquarters office in San Francisco, California, and moved the Buzzsaw employees to a new Autodesk office location, which is also in San Francisco (see Note 11, Restructuring and Other for further discussion).

(in thousands, except per share data)


  Fiscal year ended
January 31,
2002


Net revenues

  $953,255

Net income

  $76,042

Basic earnings per share

  $0.70

Diluted earnings per share

  $0.68

 

During the period from February 1, 2001 to August 20, 2001, Autodesk recognized $1.2 million of losses associated with its equity investment in Buzzsaw. None of these losses were recognized during the second or third quarters since Autodesk had previously expensed all prior investments made. During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2001, Autodesk recognized $16.3 million of losses associated with its equity investment in Buzzsaw.

 

5956


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Note 11. Restructuring and Other

 

The following table sets forth the components of Restructuring and Other in the consolidated statements of income for the fiscal years ended January 31, (in thousands):

 

  

2003


  

2002


  

2001


 
  

(In thousands)

   2004

  2003

  2002

Restructuring and exit charges, net

  

$

25,887

  

$

28,097

  

$

(1,234

)

  $3,183  $25,887  $28,097

Acquired in-process research and development charges

  

 

—  

  

 

3,180

  

 

—  

 

   —     —     3,180

Goodwill write off

  

 

—  

  

 

2,353

  

 

—  

 

Goodwill write-off

   —     —     2,353
  

  

  


  

  

  

  

$

25,887

  

$

33,630

  

$

(1,234

)

  $3,183  $25,887  $33,630
  

  

  


  

  

  

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 the Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan that involves the elimination of between 550 and 650 positions and the closure of a number of offices worldwide. This plan is designed to further reduce operating expense levels to enable us to achieve our targeted operating margins as well as redirect resources to product development, sales development and other critical areas. The restructuring charge under this plan is estimated to be up to $37.0 million incurred over four quarters beginning the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. Of the $37.0 million, $26.0 million is attributable to one-time termination benefits and $11.0 million is attributable to office closure costs.

 

During fiscal 20032004, Autodesk recognized $25.9net $3.2 million of restructuring and other charges resulting solely from restructuring activities. OfThe net charge of $3.2 million is comprised of $3.8 million related to the $25.9 million, $10.7fiscal 2004 restructuring plan, recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, $1.1 million related to additional office closure costs associated withunder the fiscal 2002 restructuring plan $18.2and reversals of the accrual for changes in estimates of $1.7 million related to a newunderlying liabilities originally established under the fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003 restructuring plan and a credit of $3.0 million was recorded as a result of accrual reversals. Of the $10.7 million, $1.2 millionplans. The underlying liabilities, primarily related to employee termination costs outside the further consolidation of certain European offices and the remaining $9.5 million resulted from changes to estimated accrued liabilities related to vacated facilities. United States, were ultimately settled for less than originally estimated.

Since the offices were closedoffice closures in fiscal 2002, there has been a significant downturn in the commercial real estate market, particularly in Northern Californiaareas of the United Kingdom where some of the offices are located. As such, Autodesk is unable to either buy-out the remaining lease obligations at favorable amounts or sub-lease the space at amounts originally estimated during fiscal 2002.

 

Of the $3.8 million related to the fiscal 2004 plan, $0.2 million related to office closure costs and $3.6 million related to the termination of 71 employees in the United States and 15 employees outside the United States. Office closure costs included losses on operating leases and the write-off of leasehold improvements and equipment. Employee termination costs consisted of one-time termination benefits including severance benefits, medical benefits and outplacement costs.

During fiscal 2003 Autodesk recognized $25.9 million of restructuring and other charges. The $25.9 million was comprised of $10.7 million related to additional costs associated with the fiscal 2002 restructuring plan and $18.3 million related to the fiscal 2003 restructuring plan, offset by a credit of $2.1 million resulting from accrual reversals and a credit of $1.0 million related to the reversal of the remaining restructuring charges related to the fiscal 2000 restructuring program. Of the $10.7 million, $1.2 million related to the further consolidation of certain European offices and the remaining $9.5 million resulted from changes to estimated accrued liabilities related to vacated facilities.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2003 the Board of Directors approved a new restructuring plan that resulted in the termination of 394 employees and the closure of several additional international and domestic offices. This plan was designed to help further reduce operating expense levels as well as redirect resources to product development and other critical areas. During the year ended ended January 31, 2003, Autodesk recognized $18.2$18.3 million of expenses as part of this restructuring effort, of which $16.5 million related to employee termination costs and $1.7$1.8 million related to office closures. Employee termination costs consisted of wage continuation, advance notice pay, medical benefits and outplacement costs for 184 employees in the U.S.United States and 210 employees outside the U.S.United States. Office closure costs included losses on operating leases and the write-off of leasehold improvements and equipment. During fiscal year 2003 we also reversed $2.0 million and $1.0$2.1 million of accruals related to restructuring reserves established in fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2000, respectively.2002. The facility-related accruals were settled for less than originally estimated.

 

During fiscal 2002 Autodesk recognized $33.6 million of restructuring and other charges. These charges resulted from restructuring activities ($24.5 million), in-process research and development expenses related to the acquisition of the software division of Media 100 ($3.2 million—see Note 10)10, “Business Combinations”), the wind-down costs associated with the dissolution of RedSpark ($3.6 million—see Note 5)5, “Gain on Disposal of Affiliate”), and a goodwill write-off of $2.3 million. The write-off of goodwill primarily related to an acquired Infrastructure Solutions Division (formerly GIS) business and resulted from a strategic decision to abandon the underlying product line.

 

Of the $3.6 million of RedSpark wind-down costs, $1.3 million related to losses on asset disposals and $2.3 million related to employee termination costs.

 

57


Of the $24.5 million associated with restructuring activities during fiscal 2002, $19.4$19.2 million related to the closure of several domestic and international offices and $5.1$5.3 million related to employee termination costs. Office closure costs of $19.4$19.2 million included losses on operating leases and the write-off of leasehold improvements and equipment. These asset write-offs totaled $1.8 million. Employee termination costs associated

60


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

with staff reductions mostly in the U.S. consisted of wage continuation, advance notice pay and medical benefits. These restructuring activities were part of a formal exit plan that was approved by the Board of Directors and were part of an effort to reduce operating expense levels. The plan included the termination of 164 employees and the closure of several domestic and international offices.

 

During fiscal 2001 Autodesk recorded credits totaling $1.2 million, which resulted from accrual reversals. The underlying liabilities, which were originally established in fiscal 2000 primarily as a result of restructuring activity, were settled for less than originally estimated.

The following table sets forth the restructuring activities during for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 20032004 (in thousands). The fiscal 2003 office closure cost balances in the table below have been adjusted by $2.7 million to reflect actual charges utilized and reversals related to Board approved restructuring reserves. While the actual charges utilized and reversals were properly reflected in Autodesk’s financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003, they had not been properly reflected in the restructuring reserves table in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Autodesk’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003. This adjustment did not impact Autodesk’s financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or earnings per share. The balance at January 31, 20032004 is included in other accrued liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

  

Office Closure Costs


   

Employee

Termination Costs


     

Losses on Asset Disposals—RedSpark


   

Total


 

Balance at January 31, 2000

  

$

1,200

 

  

$

1,000

 

    

$

—  

 

  

$

2,200

 

Additions

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Charges utilized

  

 

(180

)

  

 

(395

)

    

 

—  

 

  

 

(575

)

Reversals

  

 

(809

)

  

 

(425

)

    

 

—  

 

  

 

(1,234

)

  


  


    


  


  Office Closure Costs

 

Employee

Termination Costs


 Losses on Asset
Disposals -RedSpark


 Total

 

Balance at January 31, 2001

  

$

211

 

  

$

180

 

    

$

—  

 

  

$

391

 

  $211  $180  $—    $391 

Additions

  

 

19,408

 

  

 

7,397

 

    

 

1,292

 

  

 

28,097

 

   19,408   7,397   1,292   28,097 

Charges utilized

  

 

(2,125

)

  

 

(3,069

)

    

 

(1,292

)

  

 

(6,486

)

   (2,125)  (3,069)  (1,292)  (6,486)
  


  


    


  


  


 


 


 


Balance at January 31, 2002

  

$

17,494

 

  

$

4,508

 

    

$

—  

 

  

$

22,002

 

   17,494   4,508   —     22,002 

Additions related to 2002 plan

  

 

10,693

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

10,693

 

   10,693   —     —     10,693 

Additions related to 2003 plan

  

 

1,796

 

  

 

16,451

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

18,247

 

   1,796   16,451   —     18,247 

Charges utilized

  

 

(16,774

)

  

 

(12,707

)

    

 

—  

 

  

 

(29,481

)

   (15,074)  (12,707)  —     (27,781)

Reversals

  

 

(3,053

)

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

(3,053

)

   (2,053)  —     —     (2,053)
  


  


    


  


  


 


 


 


Balance at January 31, 2003

  

$

10,156

 

  

$

8,252

 

    

$

—  

 

  

$

18,408

 

   12,856   8,252   —     21,108 

Additions related to 2002 plan

   1,098   —     —     1,098 

Additions related to 2004 plan

   149   3,610   —     3,759 

Charges utilized

   (6,220)  (9,218)  —     (15,438)

Reversals

   (197)  (1,477)  —     (1,674)
  


  


    


  


  


 


 


 


Balance at January 31, 2004

  $7,686  $1,167  $—    $8,853 
  


 


 


 


 

Charges utilized include $0.1 million, $1.3 million, and $0 of non-cash charges during fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Autodesk expects to pay the employee termination costs within one year, and the office closure costs over the remaining lease terms, ranging from one to 5five years.

An analysis of the fiscal 2004 restructuring charges by reportable segment is included in Note 13, “Segments.”

 

Note 12. Interest and Other Income

 

The following table sets forth the components of Interest and other income, net forconsists of the fiscal years ended January 31, 2003 (in thousands):following:

 

  2004

 2003

 2002

 
  

2003


   

2002


   

2001


   (In thousands) 

Interest and investment income

  

$

9,466

 

  

$

14,144

 

  

$

22,397

 

  $10,377  $9,466  $14,144 

Gains (losses) on foreign currency transactions

  

 

1,727

 

  

 

(440

)

  

 

(628

)

   3,255   1,727   (440)

Minority interest in net loss of RedSpark

  

 

—  

 

  

 

2,657

 

  

 

1,112

 

   —     —     2,657 

Write-downs of investments in privately-held businesses

  

 

(3,436

)

  

 

(2,861

)

  

 

(2,553

)

Realized gains (losses) on investments

  

 

2,069

 

  

 

2,775

 

  

 

(263

)

Write-downs of cost method investments

   (596)  (3,436)  (2,861)

Realized gains on sales of marketable securities

   1,644   2,069   2,775 

Other

  

 

3,678

 

  

 

2,783

 

  

 

983

 

   2,279   3,678   2,783 
  


  


  


  


 


 


  

$

13,504

 

  

$

19,058

 

  

$

21,048

 

  $16,959  $13,504  $19,058 
  


  


  


  


 


 


 

6158


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Note 13. Segments

 

Autodesk’s operating results have beenare aggregated into two reportable segments: the Design Solutions Segment and the Discreet Segment. During the first quarter of fiscal 2004, Autodesk modified its segment disclosure to align the segment disclosure with how Autodesk’s business is currently being managed and evaluated. Under the revised segment disclosure, a significant amount of costs previously not allocated to either reportable segment, such as geographic sales and marketing expenditures, are being allocated to the Design Solutions Segment, thereby reducing the Design Solutions Segment profitability. Also, certain costs of operations previously allocated to the Discreet and the Design Solutions Segment.Segments are no longer being allocated. Additionally, the Locations Services Division is no longer included with the Design Solutions Segment and is reflected as Other. Prior period numbers have been restated to reflect the current segment alignment.

The Design Solutions Segment derives revenues from the sale of design software products and services for professionals or consumers who design, build, manage and own building projects or manufactured goods and from the sale of mapping and geographic information systems technology to public and private users. The Design Solutions Segment consists primarily of the following business divisions: Manufacturing Solutions Division, Infrastructure Solutions Division, Building Solutions Division and the Platform Technology Division and Other, which includes Autodesk Consulting. Sales of AutoCAD, AutoCAD upgrades and AutoCAD LT in the aggregate accounted for 45%, 43% and 46% of our consolidated net revenues in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

 

The Discreet Segment derives revenues from the sale of its products to broadcasters, post production facilities, film studios and creative professionals for a variety of applications, including feature films, television programs, commercials, music and corporate videos, interactive game production, design visualization, Webweb design and interactive Webweb streaming.

The Design Solutions Segment derives revenues from the sale of design software products and services to professionals or consumers who design, build, manage and own building products or manufactured goods, and from the sale of mapping and infrastructure management technologies to public and private users. The Design Solutions Segment consists primarily of the following business divisions, all of which have industry-specific focuses: Manufacturing Solutions Division, Infrastructure Solutions Division (formerly Geographic Information Services), Building Solutions Division and the Platform Technology Division and Other which includes the Location Services Division and Autodesk Professional Services. Sales of AutoCAD, AutoCAD upgrades and AutoCAD LT accounted for 43 percent, 46 percent and 47 percent of our consolidated net revenues in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

 

Both segments primarily distribute their respective products through authorized dealers and distributors, and, in some cases, they also sell their products directly to end-users.

 

The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1, to Notes“Business and Summary of Consolidated Financial Statements.Significant Accounting Policies”. Autodesk evaluates each segment’s performance on the basis of income from operations before income taxes. Autodesk currently does not separately accumulate and report asset information by segment, except for certain assets such as goodwill. Information concerning the operations of Autodesk’s reportable segments wasis as follows:

 

  

Fiscal year ended January 31,


   Fiscal year ended January 31,

 
  

2003


   

2002


   

2001


   2004

 2003

 2002

 
  

(In millions)

   (In millions) 

Net revenues:

            

Design Solutions

  

$

696.4

 

  

$

791.4

 

  

$

743.1

 

  $811.7  $694.4  $790.2 

Discreet

  

 

128.5

 

  

 

156.1

 

  

 

193.2

 

   139.6   128.5   156.1 

Other

   0.3   2.0   1.2 
  


  


  


  


 


 


  

$

824.9

 

  

$

947.5

 

  

$

936.3

 

  $951.6  $824.9  $947.5 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Income (loss) from operations:

            

Design Solutions

  

$

463.0

 

  

$

520.2

 

  

$

509.0

 

  $314.9  $242.9  $318.2 

Discreet

  

 

(19.0

)

  

 

(5.3

)

  

 

23.1

 

   3.1   (17.3)  (2.4)

Unallocated amounts(1)

  

 

(419.0

)

  

 

(416.7

)

  

 

(392.1

)

Unallocated amounts(1)

   (211.8)  (200.6)  (217.6)
  


  


  


  


 


 


  

$

25.0

 

  

$

98.2

 

  

$

140.0

 

  $106.2  $25.0  $98.2 
  


  


  


  


 


 


Depreciation and amortization:

            

Design Solutions

  

$

21.8

 

  

$

29.0

 

  

$

28.3

 

  $22.8  $23.8  $31.0 

Discreet

  

 

7.5

 

  

 

10.5

 

  

 

16.8

 

   6.2   7.4   10.3 

Unallocated amounts

  

 

19.5

 

  

 

23.4

 

  

 

23.7

 

   21.3   17.6   21.6 
  


  


  


  


 


 


  

$

48.8

 

  

$

62.9

 

  

$

68.8

 

  $50.3  $48.8  $62.9 
  


  


  


  


 


 



(1)

Unallocated amounts are attributed primarily to corporate expenses and other geographic costs and expenses that are managed outside the reportable segments. Unallocated amounts in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 also include $3.2 million, $25.9 million of

62


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

charges resulting from restructuring activity. Unallocated amounts in fiscal 2002 also includeand $33.6 million of charges, respectively, primarily resulting from restructuring activity. Unallocated amounts in fiscal 2001 also include $1.2 million of credits, resulting from fiscal 2000 corporate restructuring accrual reversals.

 

59


Net revenues attributable to the major divisions within the Design Solutions Segment are as follows:

 

  

Fiscal year ended January 31,


  Fiscal year ended January 31,

  

2003


  

2002


  

2001


  2004

  2003

  2002

  

(In millions)

  (In millions)

Net revenues:

                  

Manufacturing Solutions Division

  

$

118.8

  

$

130.2

  

$

134.0

  $139.5  $118.8  $130.2

Infrastructure Solutions Division (formerly GIS)

  

 

103.4

  

 

116.4

  

 

97.5

Building Solutions Group

  

 

73.5

  

 

82.9

  

 

57.6

Infrastructure Solutions Division

   115.2   103.4   116.4

Building Solutions Division

   80.3   73.5   82.9

Platform Technology Division and Other

  

 

400.7

  

 

461.9

  

 

454.0

   476.7   398.7   460.7
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

$

696.4

  

$

791.4

  

$

743.1

  $811.7  $694.4  $790.2
  

  

  

  

  

  

 

Information regarding Autodesk’s operations by geographic area is as follows:

 

  

Fiscal year ended January 31,


  Fiscal year ended January 31,

  

2003


  

2002


  

2001


  2004

  2003

  2002

  

(In millions)

  (In millions)

Net revenues:

                  

U.S. customers

  

$

321.7

  

$

325.2

  

$

374.9

  $348.7  $321.7  $325.2

Other Americas

  

 

52.5

  

 

108.5

  

 

57.8

   60.9   52.5   108.5
  

  

  

  

  

  

Total Americas

  

 

374.2

  

 

433.7

  

 

432.7

   409.6   374.2   433.7

Europe

  

 

263.4

  

 

290.8

  

 

296.0

Europe, Middle East and Africa

   337.2   263.4   290.8

Asia Pacific

  

 

187.3

  

 

223.0

  

 

207.6

   204.8   187.3   223.0
  

  

  

  

  

  

Total net revenues

  

$

824.9

  

$

947.5

  

$

936.3

  $951.6  $824.9  $947.5
  

  

  

  

  

  

 

  

January 31,


 
  

2003


   

2002


   January 31,

 
  

(In millions)

   2004

 2003

 

Long-lived assets:(1)

      
  (In millions) 

Long-lived assets:(1)

   

U.S. operations

  

$

239.7

 

  

$

137.1

 

  $252.0  $239.7 

Other Americas

  

 

34.2

 

  

 

34.7

 

   5.0   34.2 
  


  


  


 


Total Americas

  

 

273.9

 

  

 

171.8

 

   257.0   273.9 

Neuchâtel, Switzerland(2)

  

 

319.1

 

  

 

300.5

 

Other Europe

  

 

230.6

 

  

 

227.1

 

  


  


  


 


Total Europe

  

 

549.7

 

  

 

527.6

 

Neuchâtel, Switzerland(2)

   317.5   319.1 

Other Europe, Middle East and Africa

   230.7   230.6 
  


 


Total Europe, Middle East and Africa

   548.2   549.7 
  


 


Asia Pacific

  

 

8.2

 

  

 

8.8

 

   8.4   8.2 
  


 


Consolidating eliminations

  

 

(561.8

)

  

 

(565.9

)

   (559.7)  (561.8)
  


  


  


 


Total long-lived assets

  

$

270.0

 

  

$

142.3

 

  $253.9  $270.0 
  


  


  


 



(1)Long-lived assets exclude financial instruments and deferred tax assets. As such, marketable securities and deferred taxes have been excluded above.

(2)Investment in Discreet held by Neuchâtel. This investment eliminates upon consolidation.

 

63


AUTODESK, INC.As noted in Note 11, “Restructuring and Other”, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 the Board of Directors approved a new restructuring plan that involves the elimination of between 550 and 650 positions and the closure of a number of offices worldwide. The restructuring charge under this plan is estimated to be $37.0 million incurred over the four quarters beginning the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. Of the $37.0 million, $31.0 million is attributable to the Design Solutions Segment and $6.0 million is attributable to the Discreet Segment.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)The following table sets forth the fiscal 2004 restructuring plan activities for Autodesk’s reportable segments for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 (in thousands):

   Design Solutions Segment

  Discreet Segment

    
   Office Closure
Costs


  

Employee

Termination Costs


  Office Closure
Costs


  

Employee

Termination Costs


  Total

 

Balance at January 31, 2003

  $ —    $—    $ —    $—    $—   

Additions

   149   2,414   —     1,196   3,759 

Charges utilized

   —     (1,636)  —     (863)  (2,499)

Reversals

   —     —     —     —     —   
   

  


 

  


 


Balance at January 31, 2004

  $149  $778  $ —    $333  $1,260 
   

  


 

  


 


60


Note 14. Comprehensive Income

 

The changes in the components of totalother comprehensive income, net of taxes, were as follows:

   January 31,

 
   2004

  2003

  2002

 
   (In thousands) 

Net income

  $120,316  $31,904  $90,313 

Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities:

             

Change in net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax benefit (charge) of $292 in 2004, $(1,288) in 2003 and $(836) in 2002

   (457)  2,016   1,776 

Less: net unrealized gains reclassified into earnings, net of tax charge of $641 in 2004, $806 in 2003 and $888 in 2002

   1,003   1,263   1,887 
   


 

  


Change in net unrealized gains

   (1,460)  753   (111)
   


 

�� 


Net change in cumulative translation adjustment

   8,274   7,651   (3,757)
   


 

  


Comprehensive income

  $127,130  $40,308  $86,445 
   


 

  


The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, in the balance sheet arenet of taxes, were as follows:

 

   

January 31,


 
   

2003


   

2002


 
   

(In thousands)

 

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax

  

$

2,999

 

  

$

2,246

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  

 

(14,567

)

  

 

(22,218

)

   


  


Total accumulated other comprehensive loss

  

$

(11,568

)

  

$

(19,972

)

   


  


The related income tax effects allocated to each component of other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:

   

Amount before taxes


   

Income tax (expense) benefit


   

Amount net of taxes


 
   

(In thousands)

 

Fiscal 2003:

               

Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities

  

$

(1,037

)

  

$

280

 

  

$

(757

)

Less: reclassification for amounts realized in net income

  

 

2,069

 

  

 

(559

)

  

 

1,510

 

   


  


  


Net unrealized gains

  

 

1,032

 

  

 

(279

)

  

 

753

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  

 

7,651

 

  

 

 

  

 

7,651

 

   


  


  


Total other comprehensive (loss) income

  

$

8,683

 

  

$

(279

)

  

$

8,404

 

   


  


  


Fiscal 2002:

               

Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities

  

$

(3,555

)

  

$

1,067

 

  

$

(2,488

)

Less: reclassification for amounts realized in net income

  

 

3,396

 

  

 

(1,019

)

  

 

2,377

 

   


  


  


Net unrealized losses

  

 

(159

)

  

 

48

 

  

 

(111

)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  

 

(3,757

)

  

 

 

  

 

(3,757

)

   


  


  


Total other comprehensive (loss) income

  

$

(3,916

)

  

$

48

 

  

$

(3,868

)

   


  


  


Fiscal 2001:

               

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities

  

$

5,405

 

  

$

(1,730

)

  

$

3,675

 

Less: reclassification for amounts realized in net income

  

 

76

 

  

 

(24

)

  

 

52

 

   


  


  


Net unrealized gains

  

 

5,481

 

  

 

(1,754

)

  

 

3,727

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  

 

(5,009

)

  

 

 

  

 

(5,009

)

   


  


  


Total other comprehensive income (loss)

  

$

472

 

  

$

(1,754

)

  

$

(1,282

)

   


  


  


64


AUTODESK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   January 31,

 
   2004

  2003

 
   (In thousands) 

Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities

  $1,539  $2,999 

Currency translation adjustments

   (6,293)  (14,567)
   


 


Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  $(4,754) $(11,568)
   


 


 

Note 15. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

 

Summarized quarterly financial information for fiscal 2003, 20022004 and 20012003 is as follows:

 

  

1st quarter


  

2nd quarter


  

3rd quarter


   

4th quarter


  

Fiscal

year


  

(In thousands, except per share data)

  1st
quarter


  2nd
quarter


  3rd
quarter


 4th
quarter


  

Fiscal

year


Fiscal 2003

               

Net revenues

  

$

229,327

  

$

211,401

  

$

188,701

 

  

$

195,516

  

$

824,945

Gross margin

  

 

188,635

  

 

177,191

  

 

156,866

 

  

 

162,091

  

 

684,783

Income (loss) from operations

  

 

21,188

  

 

10,393

  

 

(7,845

)

  

 

1,226

  

 

24,962

Net income

  

 

17,641

  

 

11,760

  

 

(3,910

)

  

 

6,413

  

 

31,904

Basic net income per share

  

 

0.16

  

 

0.10

  

 

(0.03

)

  

 

0.06

  

 

0.28

Diluted net income per share

  

 

0.15

  

 

0.10

  

 

(0.03

)

  

 

0.06

  

 

0.28

  (In thousands, except per share data)

Fiscal 2002

               

Fiscal 2004

            

Net revenues

  

$

245,740

  

$

231,360

  

$

216,357

 

  

$

254,034

  

$

947,491

  $210,766  $211,705  $233,862  $295,310  $951,643

Gross margin

  

 

209,015

  

 

196,167

  

 

178,558

 

  

 

212,548

  

 

796,288

   172,524   175,659   197,253   258,079   803,515

Income from operations

  

 

36,601

  

 

19,388

  

 

12,832

 

  

 

29,353

  

 

98,174

   6,607   13,941   27,940   57,749   106,237

Net income

  

 

27,900

  

 

19,173

  

 

21,471

 

  

 

21,769

  

 

90,313

   7,508   32,602   22,606   57,600   120,316

Basic net income per share

  

 

0.26

  

 

0.18

  

 

0.20

 

  

 

0.20

  

 

0.83

   0.07   0.29   0.20   0.52   1.08

Diluted net income per share

  

 

0.25

  

 

0.17

  

 

0.19

 

  

 

0.19

  

 

0.80

   0.07   0.29   0.20   0.48   1.04

Fiscal 2001

               

Fiscal 2003

            

Net revenues

  

$

231,259

  

$

232,841

  

$

229,177

 

  

$

243,047

  

$

936,324

  $229,327  $211,401  $188,701  $195,516  $824,945

Gross margin

  

 

194,533

  

 

193,632

  

 

191,221

 

  

 

206,740

  

 

786,126

   187,056   175,835   155,509   160,735   679,135

Income from operations

  

 

37,983

  

 

34,000

  

 

29,520

 

  

 

38,511

  

 

140,014

Net income

  

 

25,606

  

 

20,753

  

 

18,511

 

  

 

28,363

  

 

93,233

Basic net income per share

  

 

0.22

  

 

0.18

  

 

0.16

 

  

 

0.26

  

 

0.82

Diluted net income per share

  

 

0.20

  

 

0.18

  

 

0.16

 

  

 

0.25

  

 

0.80

Income (loss) from operations

   21,188   10,393   (7,845)  1,226   24,962

Net income (loss)

   17,641   11,760   (3,910)  6,413   31,904

Basic net income (loss) per share

   0.16   0.10   (0.03)  0.06   0.28

Diluted net income (loss) per share

   0.15   0.10   (0.03)  0.06   0.28

 

Results for the second quarter of fiscal 2004 include a non-recurring tax benefit of $19.7 million. Results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 include a non-recurring tax benefit of $7.0 million and restructuring and other charges of $3.2 million, which related to corporate restructuring activities.

61


Results for the first, second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2003 include restructuring and other charges totaling $1.5 million, $3.8 million, $13.3 million and $7.3 million, respectively, which related to corporate restructuring activities. ResultsIn addition, results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 also include a non-recurring tax benefit of $3.8 million.

 

Results for the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2002 include restructuringAutodesk previously classified Information Technology and other charges totaling $9.8 million, $7.3 millioncorporate service costs that benefit the entire organization as General and $16.6 million, respectively, $24.5 millionAdministrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of which related to corporate restructuring activities, $3.2 million of which related toIncome. During the third quarter acquisition of Media 100 and $3.6 million of which related to wind-down costs associated with the dissolution of RedSpark during the third quarter. Results for the third quarter of 2002 also include a gain on disposal of affiliate of $9.5 million.

Results for the first quarter and thirdfourth quarter of fiscal 2001 included credits totaling $0.8 million2004, Autodesk re-evaluated its cost allocation methodology and $0.4 million, respectively, $1.0 millionreclassified these costs to other functional areas of which relatedthe business that benefit from these services. This reclassification has no impact on Autodesk’s total income from operations or net income. As a result of this reclassification, the gross margin for fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003 were reduced as follows:

   1st
quarter


  2nd
quarter


  3rd
quarter


  4th
quarter


  

Fiscal

year


   (In thousands)

Fiscal 2004

                    

Gross margin as previously reported

  $173,815  $176,809  $198,498  $258,079  $807,201

Gross margin as reclassified

   172,524   175,659   197,253   258,079   803,515
   

  

  

  

  

Effect of reclassification

  $1,291  $1,150  $1,245  $—    $3,686
   

  

  

  

  

Fiscal 2003

                    

Gross margin as previously reported

  $188,635  $177,191  $156,866  $162,091  $684,783

Gross margin as reclassified

   187,056   175,835   155,509   160,735   679,135
   

  

  

  

  

Effect of reclassification

  $1,579  $1,356  $1,357  $1,356  $5,648
   

  

  

  

  

Note 16. Subsequent Events (Unaudited)

In March 2004, Autodesk acquired certain assets of MechSoft, Inc (“MechSoft”). MechSoft technology complements Autodesk’s solutions with tools that enable users to embed engineering calculations into their designs based on how parts function. Autodesk plans to integrate key components of MechSoft’s technology into future versions of Autodesk Inventor Series. The assets acquired were assigned to the reversalManufacturing Solutions Division of fiscal 2000 restructuring charges.the Design Solutions Segment.

 

6562


REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Autodesk, Inc.

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Autodesk, Inc., as of January 31, 20032004 and 20022003 and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2003.2004. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of Autodesk’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Autodesk, Inc. at January 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, and the consolidated results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2003,2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

 

As discussed in Note 1 in the consolidated financial statements, in fiscal year 20032002 Autodesk, Inc. changed its method of accounting for goodwill and other purchased intangible assets in accordance with guidance provided in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”assets.

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

Palo Alto, California

April 9, 2003

February24, 2004

 

66


ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART III

 

Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Report in that the Registrant will file a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A (the “Proxy Statement”) not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report

63


and certain information included therein is incorporated herein by reference. Only those sections of the Proxy Statement that specifically address the items set forth herein are incorporated by reference. Such incorporation does not include the Compensation Committee Report or the Performance Graph included in the Proxy Statement.

 

ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The information concerning Autodesk’s directors and compliance with Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 required by this Item are incorporated by reference to the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled “Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a)—Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”

The information concerning Autodesk’s executive officers required by this Item is incorporated by reference herein to the section of this Report at the end of Part I, entitled “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

 

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONThe information concerning Autodesk’s directors, compliance with Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and our code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer required by this Item are incorporated by reference to the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled “Election of Directors,” “Section 16(a) – Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Code of Business Conduct.”

The information concerning Autodesk’s executive officers required by this Item is incorporated by reference herein to the section of this Report at the end of Part I, entitled “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled “Election of Directors”Directors—Compensation of Directors,” “Executive Officer Compensation” and “Management.“Employee and Director Stock Options.

 

ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information.”

 

ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled “Employment Contracts and Certain Transactions.”

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

ITEM 14.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)    Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, after evaluating our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) Rules 13a-14(c) and 15-d-14(c)) as of a date (the “Evaluation Date”) within 90 days beforeThe information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K have concluded that assection of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controlsProxy Statement entitled “Employment Contracts and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.Certain Transactions.”

 

ITEM 14.

67PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES


 

(b)    Changes in internal controls.

Our review of our internal controls was made withinThe information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the contextsection of the relevant professional auditing standards defining “internal controls,” “reportable conditions” and “material weaknesses.” “Internal controls” are processes designed to provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are properly authorized, our assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use and our transactions are properly recorded and reported, all to permit the preparationProxy Statement entitled “Ratification of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. “Significant deficiencies” are referred to as “reportable conditions,” or control issues that could have a significant adverse effect on our ability to properly authorize transactions, safeguard our assets or record, process, summarize or report financial data in the consolidated financial statements. A “material weakness” is a particularly serious reportable condition where the internal control does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud may occur in amounts that would be material in relation to the consolidated financial statements and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal courseAppointment of performing their assigned functions. As part of our internal controls procedures, we also address other, less significant control matters that we or our auditors identify, and we determine what revision or improvement to make, if any, in accordance with our on-going procedures. Subsequent to the Evaluation Date, there were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.Independent Auditors—Fee Disclosure.”

 

PART IV

ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

 

(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this Report:

 

1.Financial Statements: The information concerning Autodesk’s financial statements, and Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors required by this Item is incorporated by reference herein to the section of this Report in Item 8, entitled “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

 

2.Financial Statement Schedule: The following financial statement schedule of Autodesk, Inc., for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 2001,2002, is filed as part of this Report and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of Autodesk, Inc.

 

Schedule II

Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

S-1

 

Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or are not required or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.

 

68


3.Exhibits: The Exhibits listed below are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Report.See Item 15(c) below.

Exhibit No.


Description


  2.1(7)

Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Autodesk, Inc., Rosie Acquisition Corporation, Revit Technology Corporation and Irwin Jungreis as Stockholder Representative dated as of February 21, 2002

  3.1

Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant

  3.2

Bylaws of Registrant, as amended

  4.1(5)

Preferred Shares Right Agreement dated December 14, 1995

  4.2(5)

Amendment No. 1 to Preferred Shares Rights Agreement

10.1(3)*

Registrant’s 1998 Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan and form of Subscription Agreement, as amended

10.2(2)*

Registrant’s 2000 Directors’ Option Plan

10.3(3)*

Registrant’s 1996 Stock Plan, as amended

10.4(6)*

Form of Indemnification Agreement executed by Autodesk and each of its officers and directors

10.5(1)*

Agreement between Registrant and Carol A. Bartz dated April 7, 1992

10.6(4)*

Retention Agreement dated September 8, 1999

10.7(4)*

Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, as amended through March 20, 2001

10.8*

Executive Change in Control Program

21.1

List of Subsidiaries

23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

24.1

Power of Attorney (contained in the signature page to this Annual Report)

99.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(1)Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 1992.
(2)Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 as filed on September 15, 2000.
(3)Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2000.
(4)Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002.
(5)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-A filed on January 5, 1996, as amended on January 8, 1996 and January 15, 1998.
(6)Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1995.
(7)Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on April 16, 2002.
*Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

 

No reportsOn November 20, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K were filed duringunder Items 7 and 12 to furnish our press release announcing our financial results for the fourth quarter ended JanuaryOctober 31, 2003.

 

69

64


On November 26, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 9 to furnish our press release announcing the preliminary estimates of the restructuring charges announced in its third quarter fiscal 2004 earnings call on November 20, 2003.

(c)Exhibits. We have filed, or incorporated into this Report by reference, the exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits immediately following the signature page of this Form 10-K.

(d)Financial Statement Schedule. See Item 15(a) above.

65


ITEM 15(A)(2)  FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE II

AUTODESK, INC.

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Description


  

Balance at

Beginning

of Year


  

Additions

Charged to

Costs and

Expenses


  

Deductions

Write-Offs


  Balance at
End of Year


Fiscal year ended January 31, 2004

                

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $9,192,000  $2,378,000  $1,916,000  $9,654,000

Product returns reserve

   19,797,000   39,265,000   38,472,000   20,590,000

Price adjustment reserve

   4,088,000   5,854,000   5,751,000   4,191,000

Restructuring

   21,108,000   4,857,000   17,112,000   8,853,000

Fiscal year ended January 31, 2003

                

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $13,181,000  $(413,000) $3,576,000  $9,192,000

Product returns reserve

   20,578,000   33,264,000   34,045,000   19,797,000

Price adjustment reserve

   4,352,000   3,297,000   3,561,000   4,088,000

Restructuring

   22,002,000   28,940,000   29,834,000   21,108,000

Fiscal year ended January 31, 2002

                

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $11,611,000  $4,519,000  $2,949,000  $13,181,000

Product returns reserve

   17,761,000   45,876,000   43,059,000   20,578,000

Price adjustment reserve

   3,211,000   1,803,000   662,000   4,352,000

Restructuring

   391,000   28,097,000   6,486,000   22,002,000

66


SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

AUTODESK, INC.

By:

 

/s/    CAROL A. BARTZ        


  

Carol A. Bartz

Chairman of the Board

 

Dated: April 25, 2003

Dated:April 8, 2004

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Carol A. Bartz and Alfred J. Castino as his or her attorney-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature


  

Title


 

Date


/s/    CAROL A. BARTZ        


Carol A. Bartz

  

Chairman, Chief Executive

Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

April 25, 2003

8, 2004

/s/    ALFRED J. CASTINO        


Alfred J. Castino

  

Senior Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer (Principal

Financial Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)

 

April 25, 2003

8, 2004

/s/    MARK A. BERTELSEN        


Mark A. Bertelsen

  

Director

 

April 25, 2003

8, 2004

/s/    CRAWFORD W. BEVERIDGE        


Crawford W. Beveridge

  

Director

 

April 25, 2003

8, 2004

/s/    J. HALLAM DAWSON        


J. Hallam Dawson

  

Director

 

April 25, 2003

8, 2004

/s/    MIKE FISTER        


Mike Fister

Director

April 8, 2004

/s/    PER-KRISTIAN HALVORSEN        


Per-Kristian Halvorsen

  

Director

 

April 25, 2003

/s/    PAUL S. OTELLINI        


Paul S. Otellini

Director

April 25, 2003

8, 2004

 

67


70


Signature


  

Title


 

Date


/s/    STEVEN L. SCHEID        


Steven L. Scheid

  

Director

 

April 25, 2003

8, 2004

/s/    MARY ALICE TAYLOR        


Mary Alice Taylor

  

Director

 

April 25, 2003

8, 2004

/s/    LARRY W. WANGBERG        


Larry W. Wangberg

  

Director

 

April 25, 2003

8, 2004

 

68


Index to Exhibits

Exhibit No.

   

71Description



CERTIFICATIONS

I, Carol A. Bartz, certify that:

1.
2.1 I have reviewed this annual reportAgreement and Plan of Merger by and among Autodesk, Inc., Rosie Acquisition Corporation, Revit Technology Corporation and Irwin Jungreis as Stockholder Representative dated as of February 21, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 filed with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on April 16, 2002)
3.1Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K of Autodesk, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this annual report;fiscal year ended January 31, 2003)

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 25, 2003

3.2   

/s/    CAROL A. BARTZ        Bylaws of Registrant, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003)


4.1   

Preferred Shares Right Agreement dated December 14, 1995 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-A filed on January 5, 1996, as amended on January 8, 1996 and January 15, 1998)

4.2Amendment No. 1 to Preferred Shares Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-A filed on January 5, 1996, as amended on January 8, 1996 and January 15, 1998)
10.1*Registrant’s 1998 Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan and form of Subscription Agreement, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2000)
10.2*Registrant’s 2000 Directors’ Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 as filed on September 15, 2000)
10.3*Registrant’s 1996 Stock Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2000)
10.4*Form of Indemnification Agreement executed by Autodesk and each of its officers and directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1995)
10.5*Agreement between Registrant and Carol A. Bartz

Chairman, dated April 7, 1992 (incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 1992)

10.6*Retention Agreement dated September 8, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002)
10.7*Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, as amended through March 20, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002)
10.8*Executive Change in Control Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003)
10.9*Agreement between Registrant and Tom Vadnais, dated November 21, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 filed with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003)
21.1List of Subsidiaries
23.1Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors
24.1Power of Attorney (contained in the signature page to this Annual Report)
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)

Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


72

*


I, Alfred J. Castino, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Autodesk, Inc.;Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 25, 2003

/s/    ALFRED J. CASTINO


 Alfred J. Castino

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

73


ITEM 15(A)(2)    FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE II

AUTODESK, INC.

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Description


  

Balance at

Beginning

of Year


  

Additions

Charged to

Costs and

Expenses


   

Deductions

Write-Offs


  

Balance at End of Year


Fiscal year ended January 31, 2003

                 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  

$

13,181,000

  

$

(413,000

)

  

$

3,576,000

  

$

9,192,000

Product returns reserve

  

 

20,578,000

  

 

33,264,000

 

  

 

34,045,000

  

 

19,797,000

Restructuring

  

 

22,002,000

  

 

28,940,000

 

  

 

32,534,000

  

 

18,408,000

Fiscal year ended January 31, 2002

                 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  

$

11,611,000

  

$

4,519,000

 

  

$

2,949,000

  

$

13,181,000

Product returns reserve

  

 

17,761,000

  

 

45,876,000

 

  

 

43,059,000

  

 

20,578,000

Restructuring

  

 

391,000

  

 

28,097,000

 

  

 

6,486,000

  

 

22,002,000

Fiscal year ended January 31, 2001

                 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  

$

10,652,000

  

$

3,565,000

 

  

$

2,606,000

  

$

11,611,000

Product returns reserve

  

 

19,370,000

  

 

30,721,000

 

  

 

32,330,000

  

 

17,761,000

Restructuring

  

 

2,200,000

  

 

0

 

  

 

1,809,000

  

 

391,000

74