Index to Financial Statements

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


Form 10-K

FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS

PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)

þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

2005

or

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 001-15451


United Parcel Service, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


Delaware 58-2480149

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

55 Glenlake Parkway, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30328
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(404) 828-6000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class


 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered


Class B common stock, par value $.01 per share

 New York Stock Exchange


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share

 

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  þ                            Accelerated filer  ¨                            Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filera shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act Rule 12b-2)Act).    Yes  þ    No  ¨

    No  þ

The aggregate market value of the class B common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $43,231,060,145 as of February 28, 2005 was approximately $47,836,058,376 (based on the closing price of such stock as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter). As of February 28, 2005, non-affiliates held 482,968,228 shares of class A common stock and 617,319,117 shares of class B common stock.June 30, 2005. The registrant’s class A common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or traded in an organized over-the-counter market, but each share of the registrant’s class A common stock is convertible into one share of the registrant’s class B common stock.

As of February 28, 2005,2006, there were 501,743,812443,660,015 outstanding shares of class A common stock and 617,479,339648,462,654 outstanding shares of class B common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of shareowners scheduled for May 5, 20054, 2006 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.



Index to Financial Statements

PART I

 

Item 1.Business

 

Overview

 

UPS is the world’s largest package delivery company and a global leader in supply chain solutions. We were founded in 1907 as a private messenger and delivery service in Seattle, Washington. Today, we deliver packages each business day for 1.8 million shipping customers to 6.1 million consignees in over 200 countries and territories. In 2004,2005, we delivered an average of more than 14.114.7 million pieces per day worldwide. In addition, our supply chain solutions capabilities are available to clients in 175 countries.186 countries and territories.

 

Total revenue in 20042005 was over $36.5$42.5 billion. Although our primary business is the time-definite delivery of packages and documents, we have extended our capabilities in recent years to encompass the broader spectrum of services known as supply chain solutions, such as freight forwarding, customs brokerage, fulfillment, returns, financial transactions and even repairs. We are also a leading provider of less-than-truckload (“LTL”) transportation services. We have established a global transportation infrastructure and a comprehensive portfolio of services and integrated solutions. We support these services with advanced operational and customer-facing technology. Our supply chain solutions provide visibility into moving inventory across the global supply chain.

 

We believe the future is bright for this industry.

 

Globalization of trade is a worldwide economic reality, which we believe will continue to expand as trade barriers are eliminated and large consumer markets, in particular China and India, experience economic expansion.

 

We believe direct-to-consumer shipments will continue to increase as a result of just-in-time inventory management and increased use of the Internet for ordering goods. UPS is enhancing its ability to be a “warehouse in motion” for inventory on the move. The company is also the industry leader in the delivery of goods purchased over the Internet.

 

We believe the drive toward outsourcing supply chain management will continue, as customers increasingly view effective management of their supply chains as a strategic advantage rather than a cost center.

 

Our vision for the future is to synchronize the world of commerce, managing the complexities of our customers’ supply chain needs. Our goal is to develop business solutions for all size customers that create value and competitive advantages for themall size customers through product differentiation, market penetration, better customer service and improved cash flow.

 

Competitive Strengths

 

Our competitive strengths include:

 

Global Reach and Scale.We believe that our integrated global ground and air network is the most extensive in the industry. It is the only network that handles all levels of service (express, ground, domestic, international, commercial, residential) through one integrated pickup and delivery service system.

 

We operate a ground fleet of more than 88,000approximately 98,000 vehicles, ranging from custom-built package cars to large tractors and trailers, and utilize nearly 600 airplanes. In the contiguous U.S., we reach all business and residential addresses. We are the ninth largest airline in North America and eleventh largest in the world. Our primary air hub is in Louisville, KY. Regional air hubs are located in Columbia, SC; Dallas, TX; Hartford, CT; Ontario, CA; Philadelphia, PA; and Rockford, IL. Our primarylargest international air hub is in Cologne, Germany, with other regional hubs in Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, Miami, FL and Pampanga, Philippines.

 

1


Index to Financial Statements

In Europe, where we have operated for nearly 30 years, we maintain a well developed air and ground network, much like that in the U.S. We believe we have the most comprehensive integrated delivery and information services portfolio of any carrier in Europe. In other regions of the world, we rely on both our own and local service providers’ capabilities to meet our service commitments.

 

Through more than two dozen alliances with Asian delivery companies that supplement company-owned operations, we currently serve more than 40 Asia Pacific countries and territories. The twoTwo of the fastest growing economies in the world, China and India, are among our most promising opportunities.

 

We are also the largest air cargo carrier and a leading logistics provider in Latin America and the Caribbean.

 

Our Canadian operations include both intra-Canada and import/export capabilities. We deliver to all addresses throughout Canada. We are also the only carrier to offer guaranteed 8:00 a.m. next day delivery to most major metropolitan cities in Canada.

 

Technology.We are a global leader in developing technology that improves our customers’ business processes. We have a strong global capability as a mover of electronic information. We currently collect electronic data on 95%97% of the packages that move through our U.S. system each day – more than any of our competitors.

 

In 2003 we announced plans to re-engineer our package pick-up and delivery processes. Over several years, beginning in 2003, we expect to invest approximately $600 million to simplify and optimize these processes, which we believe will result in significant gains in efficiency, reliability and flexibility. Once the new technology is fully deployed in over 1,000 of our package sorting facilities, which we estimate will be completed in 2007, we anticipate achieving hundreds of millions of dollars in reduced operating costs annually. These savings will be realized through productivity improvements as well as in reduced fuel usage from driving an estimated 100 million fewer miles each year.usage. By the end of 20042005 we had deployed this technology in 273 of our package centers for use by almost 45%61% of our drivers.

 

Technology powers virtually every service we offer and every operation we perform. Our technology initiatives are driven by our customers’ needs. We offer a variety of on-line service options that enable our customers to integrate UPS functionality into their own businesses not only to conveniently send, manage and track their shipments, but to provide their customers with better information services. We provide the infrastructure for an Internet presence that extends to tens of thousands of customers who have integrated UPS tools directly into their own web sites.

 

E-Commerce Capabilities.We are a leading facilitator of global e-commerce. According to Forrester Research, by 2008, U.S. online retail sales are forecasted to reach $271 billion.1 We enable our customers around the world to thrive in this environment by providing a portfolio of technology solutions that streamlines their shipment processing and integrateintegrates critical transportation information into their business applications.

 

Broad, Flexible Range of Services and Integrated Solutions.Our portfolio of services enables customers to choose the delivery option that is most appropriate for their requirements. AllSubstantially all of our general service offeringU.S. small package delivery services are guaranteed.

 

Our express air services are integrated with our vast ground delivery system – one system handling all products. This integrated air and ground network enhances efficiency, improves productivity and asset utilization, and provides us with the flexibility to transport packages using the most reliable and cost-effective transportation mode or combination of modes. Our sophisticated engineering systems allow us to optimize our network efficiency and asset utilization on a daily basis. This unique, integrated global business model creates consistent and superior returns – by far the best in our industry.

 


1U.S. eCommerce Overview: 2004 to 2010, Forrester Research, Inc., August 2004.

2


Increasingly, our customers benefit from business solutions that integrate many UPS services in addition to package delivery. We offer over 60 supply chain services – such as freight forwarding, customs brokerage, order fulfillment, and returns management – that help improve efficiency of the supply chain management process.

 

2


Index to Financial Statements

Customer Relationships.We focus on building and maintaining long-term customer relationships. Thousands of customers access us daily through UPS On-Call PickupSM for air and ground delivery services. In addition, there are almost 150,000approximately 145,000 domestic and international access points to UPS. These include: nearly 40,000 drop-boxes, more than 1,000 UPS Customer Centers, over 2,3002,200 Alliance partner locations, over 5,000almost 7,000 independently-owned and national Authorized Shipping Outlets, (ASOs), almost 1,300 national ASO chains, approximately 10,200over 9,600 commercial counters, more than 5,0005,600 independently owned and operated The UPS Store® and Mail Boxes Etc.® locations worldwide (over 4,0004,400 in the U.S.) – along with 80,000 UPS drivers who can accept packages given to them.

 

We place significant value on the quality of our customer relationships, and we conduct comprehensive research to monitor customer perceptions. Since 1993, we have conducted telephone interviews with shipping decision-makers virtually every business day to determine their satisfaction with small package carriers and perception of performance on 19 service factors. Results from this survey for 20042005 continue to show high levels of customer satisfaction.

 

Brand Equity.We have built a leading and trusted brand in our industry – a brand that stands for quality service, reliability and product innovation. The distinctive appearance of our vehicles and the friendliness and helpfulness of our drivers are major contributors to our brand equity.

 

In 2003 we introduced our first new logo in 42 years. The change was more than cosmetic; it signaled our commitment to provide more comprehensive solutions to meet our customers’ needs and to be the leader ofin the broader business arena of synchronized commerce.

 

Distinctive Culture.We believe that the dedication of our employees results in large part from our distinctive “employee-owner” concept. Our employee stock ownership tradition dates from 1927, when our founders, who believed that employee stock ownership was a vital foundation for successful business, first offered stock to employees. To facilitate employee stock ownership, we maintain several stock-based compensation programs.

 

Our long-standing policy of “promotion from within” complements our tradition of employee ownership, and this policy makes it generally unnecessary for us to hire managers and executive officers from outside UPS. The vast majority of our management team began their careers as full-time or part-time hourly UPS employees, and havehas spent their entire careers with us. Our chief executive officer and many of our executive officers have more than 30 years of service with UPS and have accumulated a meaningful ownership stake in our company. Therefore, our executive officers have a strong incentive to effectively manage UPS, which benefits all our shareowners.

 

Financial Strength.Our balance sheet reflects financial strength that few companies can match. As of December 31, 2004,2005, we had a balance of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and short-term investments of approximately $5.2$3.0 billion and shareowners’ equity of $16.4$16.9 billion. Long-term debt was $3.3$3.2 billion. We carry long-term debt ratings of AAA/Aaa from Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s, respectively, reflecting our low use of debt and strong capacity to service our obligations. Our financial strength gives us the resources to achieve global scale and to make investments in technology, transportation equipment and buildings as well as to pursue strategic opportunities which will facilitate our growth.

 

Growth Strategy

 

Our growth strategy takes advantage of our competitive strengths while maintaining our focus on meeting or exceeding our customers’ requirements. The principal components of our growth strategy are:

 

Build on Our Leadership Position in Our U.S. Business.We believe that our tradition of reliable package delivery service, our experienced and dedicated employees and our unmatched integrated air and ground network provide us with the advantages of reputation, service quality and economies of scale that differentiate us from our

 

3


Index to Financial Statements

competitors. Our strategy is to increase domestic revenue through cross-selling our existing and new services to our large and diverse customer base, to limit the rate of expense growth and to employ technology-driven efficiencies to increase operating profit.

 

Continued International Expansion.We have built a strong international presence through significant investments over several decades. The international package delivery market continues to grow at a faster rate than that of the U.S. We will use our worldwide infrastructure and broad product portfolio to grow high-margin premium services and to implement cost, process and technology improvements in our international operations.

 

Europe is our largest region outside the United States – accounting for half of our international revenue. Both Europe and Asia offer significant opportunities for growth. The expansion of the European Union to include several Eastern European and Baltic countries will create even greater economic cohesion. Growth in Asia will be driven by global demand, leading to improved demographic and economic trends throughout the region, with specific emphasis on China and India.

 

Provide Comprehensive Supply Chain Solutions.Many businesses outsource the management of    In today’s global economy, entire industries have outsourced all or part of their supply chains to streamline and gain efficiencies, to strengthen their balance sheets, to support new business models and to improve service. Companies’ global supply chains are growing increasingly complicated.complex. This is creating further demand for a global service offering that incorporates transportation, distribution and international trade services with financial and information services. We believe that we are well positioned to capitalize on this growth for the following reasons:

 

We manage supply chains for large and small companies in 175186 countries and territories, with about 35 million square feet of distribution space and over 1,000 facilities worldwide.

 

We focus on supply chain redesign, freight forwarding, international trade services and management-based solutions for our customers rather than solely on more traditional asset-based logistics such as warehouses and vehicle fleets. We have built valuable intellectual capital in specific high growth industries such as healthcare and high-tech.technology.

 

We provide a broad range of transportation solutions to customers worldwide, including air, ocean and ground freight, as well as customs brokerage and trade and materials management. We provide standardized service, IT systems and specialized distribution facilities and services adapted to the unique supply chains of specific industries such as healthcare, high-tech,technology, and consumer/retail and automotive.retail.

 

We offer a portfolio of financial services that provides customers with short- and long-term financing, secured lending, working capital, government guaranteed lending, letters of credit, global trade financing, credit cards and equipment leasing.

 

Leverage Our Leading-Edge Technology and E-Commerce Advantage.Our goal is to provide our customers with easy-to-use, flexible technology offerings that streamline their shipment processing and integrate critical transportation information into their business processes, helping them create supply chain efficiencies, improve their cash flows and better serve their customers. Our leading-edge technology has enabled our e-commerce partners to integrate our shipping functionality and information solutions into their e-commerce product suites.

 

Pursue Strategic Acquisitions and Global Alliances.Strategic acquisitions and global alliances play a significant role in spurring growth. We look for opportunities that:

 

complement our global package business;

 

build our global brand;

 

enhance our technological capabilities or service offerings;

 

lower our costs; or

 

expand our geographic presence.

 

4


Index to Financial Statements

Products and Services

 

Domestic Package Products and Services.For most of our history, we have been engaged primarily in the delivery of packages traveling by ground transportation. We expanded this service gradually, and today our standard ground service is available to every address in the 48 contiguous United States. With the addition of Hawaii and Alaska, we were the first to reach every address in all 50 states. We handle packages that weigh up to 150 pounds and are up to 165 inches in combined length and girth. We offer same-day pick-up of air and ground packages.

 

In addition to our standard ground delivery product,UPS Hundredweight Service® offers guaranteed, time-definite service at discounted rates to customers sending multiple package shipments having a combined weight of 200 pounds or more, or air shipments totaling 100 pounds or more, addressed to one recipient at one address and shipped on the same day. Customers may realize significant savings on these shipments compared to less-than-truckload or air freight forwarder published rates.recipient.

 

We provide domestic air delivery throughout the United States.UPS Next Day Air® offers guaranteed next business day delivery by 10:30 a.m. to 75% of the United States population and delivery by noon to areas covering an additional 15% of the population. We offer Saturday delivery for UPS Next Day Air shipments for an additional fee.

 

Additional products and services, such as UPS CampusShip, Consignee Billing, Quantum View Manage, Delivery Confirmation and UPS ReturnsSM, are available to customers who require customized package distribution solutions.

 

International Package Products and Services.We deliver international shipments to more than 200 countries and territories worldwide, and we provide delivery within one to two business days to the world’s major business centers. We offer a complete portfolio of import, export and domestic services. This portfolio includes guaranteed early morning, morning and noon delivery to major cities around the world, as well as scheduled day-definite air and ground services. We offer worldwide customs clearance service for any mode of transportation.

 

We classify our service as export (packages that cross national borders) and domestic (packages that stay within a single country’s boundaries). We have a portfolio of domestic services in 20 major countries throughout the world.

 

Transborder services, or the movement of packages within the European Union, are proving to be the growth engine in this region. ToIn early 2006, to accommodate growth opportunities across the whole of Europe, we are expanding and further automatingcompleted the expansion of our major airautomated package sorting hub at the Cologne/Bonn airport in Cologne, Germany. The expansion doubled the hub’s original sorting capacity to 110,000 packages per hour, largely through the deployment of new automation technology.

 

We continue to invest in infrastructure and technology in Asia. In April 2002, we opened a new intra-Asia hub at Clark Air Force Base in Pampanga, Philippines to enable future growth in the region. This hub allows us to compete more effectively in the Asian express market and improve our Europe/Asia service. In 2005, we announced expansion plans to triple the intra-Asia hub’s sorting capacity from 2,500 packages to 7,500 packages per hour. We obtained landing slots on the new runway at Tokyo’s Narita Airport, which have enhanced access and connections to the intra-Asia hub.

 

In 2003, we received from the U.S. Department of Transportation the authority to expand service to and through Hong Kong, including permanent authority to fly from Hong Kong to other cities, specifically to our Cologne hub in Europe. We continue our development efforts in the fast-growing China market. In 2004, the U.S. Department of Transportation authorized us to significantly expand our air operations in that country with the award of 12 new frequencies. The decision tripled UPS’s access to China. We began flying six new frequencies to Shanghai in 2004. We will begin flying another six frequencies inIn April 2005, providingUPS became the first U.S. airline to launch non-stop service frombetween the U.S. toand Guangzhou, for the first time.which lies strategically in one of

 

5


Index to Financial Statements

China’s fastest growing manufacturing regions. In 2006, we will add another three daily flights to China. Those flights are supporting international express volume into and out of China, which has seen dramatic growth in recent quarters.

We believe that there is long-term potential for us to expand our service offerings in Latin America. To this end, we have realigned our delivery capabilities between key cities in the Mercosur and other trade blocs and continue to benefit from ourblocs. Our Americas International Gateway in Miami, Florida.Florida is the focal point for trade between Latin America and the U.S. This gateway complements our operations in Florida and Latin America, and represents our commitment to the Americas market.

 

Mexico and Canada are also important to our international business. We developed the UPS Trade DirectSM Cross Border service to manage package movements between the U.S. and these countries. This service combines our small package, freight and brokerage capabilities to create an integrated, streamlined and economical door-to-door solution for customers with complex cross-border distribution needs.

 

The Trade Direct portfolio of ocean and air services integrates our small package and supply chain solutions capabilities to provide additional value to our international customers. In essence, the Trade Direct service consolidates individually labeled packages or pallets into one movement across borders. When the goods arrive in the destination country, packages are deconsolidated and entered into the UPS system for delivery, often eliminating the receiving, sorting and handling necessary in distribution centers. This service significantly cuts the supply chain cycle from point of origin to consignee. It also provides our customers with faster time to market, reduced costs, increased visibility and better management of their global supply chain.

 

In 2004 we expanded UPS Trade Direct Ocean, a service that transforms ocean container movements into pre-labeled small packages or less-than-truckload (LTL)LTL shipments. ThisAs of December 2005, this service is now available fromwas expanded to over 70 international origin ports to threeand five U.S. entry ports. In addition, a faster Trade Direct Air option is now available.was also introduced.

 

Supply Chain & Freight Services.UPS Supply Chain Solutions, which comprises our freight forwarding and logistics businesses, meets customers’ supply chain needs by selecting the most appropriate solution from a portfolio of over 60 services. Among these are:

 

  Transportation and Freight Forwarding: air, ocean, rail and ground freight for all size shipments utilizing UPS and other carriers, and multimodal transportation network management.

Logistics and Distribution:supply chain management, distribution center design, planning and management, order fulfillment, inventory management, receiving and shipping, service parts logistics, reverse logistics and cross docking.

 

  International Trade Management:freight forwarding, full-service customs brokerage and international trade consulting.

Transportation and Freight Forwarding:air, ocean, rail and ground freight utilizing UPS and other carriers, and multimodal transportation network management.

 

  Consulting Services: strategic supply chain design and re-engineering.

 

Asset-based lending, global trade finance and export-import lending services are available through UPS CapitalSM.

 

In 2005, we expanded our LTL transportation services with the acquisition of Overnite Corp., which offers a full range of regional, inter-regional and long-haul LTL services in all 50 states, Canada, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands and Mexico. Overnite, which is now known as UPS Freight, provides LTL services through a network of owned and leased service centers and carrier partnerships. UPS Freight transports a variety of products, including fabricated metal products, health care products, chemicals, textiles, machinery, furniture and fixtures, electronics, paper products and general commodities, including consumer goods, packaged food stuffs, industrial equipment and auto parts. UPS Freight also provides our customers with truckload and dedicated truckload transportation solutions (truckload shipments weigh 10,000 pounds or more).

6


Index to Financial Statements

Electronic Services.We provide a variety of UPS on-line solutions that support automated shipping and tracking:

 

  UPS WorldShip® helps shippers streamline their shipping activities by processing shipments, printing address labels, tracking packages and providing management reports, all from a desktop computer. Our technology allows us to connect to a company’s order management and fulfillment software, eliminating the need for the company to perform many time consuming tasks, such as re-keying orders.

 

  UPS CampusShip® is a web-based, UPS-hosted distributed shipping solution that allows employees of companies with multiple facilities and decentralized workforces to easily process and ship packages with UPS from their computer desktops. At the same time, the system gives transportation and mailroom decision-makers centralized control over shipping procedures and costs.

 

  UPS Internet Shippingis a quick and convenient way to ship packages using the web without installing additional software.

 

6


  UPS OnLine® Host Access provides electronic connectivity between UPS and the shipper’s host computer system, linking UPS shipping information directly to all parts of the customer’s organization.

 

  UPS Ready® encompasses electronic solutions provided by third-party vendors that benefit customers who want to automate their shipping and tracking processes.

 

  Quantum View® is a suite of three visibility services (Quantum View Manage, Quantum View Data and Quantum View Notify) that give businesses and their customers proactive status information about the status of their UPS outbound and inbound shipments. The services can be used separately or together, depending on customer needs.

 

  UPS TradeabilitySM is a software tool that helps customers navigate the complex process of international shipping by identifying harmonized tariff codes, generating landed cost estimates, and locating up-to-date compliance information.

 

Our website strategy is to provide our customers with the convenience of all the functions that they otherwise would perform over the phoneshipping functionality tools right on their computer or at one of our shipping outlets. Package tracking, pick-up requests, rate quotes, account opening, wireless registration, drop-off locator, transit times and supply ordering services are all available at the customer’s desktop.desktop or laptop. The site also displays full domestic and international service information.information and allows customers to process outbound shipments as well as return labels for their customers.

 

UPS.com receives more than 145 million hits and processes over 10 million package tracking transactions daily. A growing number of those tracking requests now come from customers in the 35those countries that have wireless access to UPS tracking information. Businesses in 46a number of countries also can download UPS OnLine ToolsSM, to their own websites for direct use by their customers. This allows users to access the information they need without leaving our customers’ websites.

 

Sales and Marketing

 

The UPS worldwide sales organization includes both our traditional U.S. domestic and international small package delivery business and our Supply Chain Solutions group.& Freight business. This field sales organization consists primarily of locally-based account executives assigned to our individual operating units. For our largest multi-shipping site customers, we manage sales through an organization of regionally-based account managers, reporting directly to our corporate office.

 

Our sales force also includes specialized groups that work together with our general sales organization to support the sale of e-commerce and customer technology solutions, international package delivery, LTL and freight transportation, and warehousing and distribution services.

 

Our worldwide marketing organization also supports both our traditional U.S. domestic and international small package delivery business and our Supply Chain Solutions group.& Freight business. Our corporate marketing function is

7


Index to Financial Statements

engaged in market and customer research, brand management, rate-making and revenue management policy, new product development, product portfolio management, marketing alliances and e-commerce, including the non-technical aspects of our web presence. Advertising, public relations, and most formal marketing communications are centrally developed and controlled.

 

In addition to our corporate marketing group, field-based marketing personnel are assigned to our individual operating units, and are primarily engaged in business planning, bid preparation and revenue management activities. These local marketing teams support the execution of corporate initiatives while also managing limited promotional and public relations activities pertinent to their local markets.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2004,2005, we had approximately 384,000407,000 employees.

 

7


We have received numerous awards and wide recognition as an employer-of-choice, including the following:

 

In February 2004,2006, we were was rated the “World’s“America’s Most Admired” company in our industry in a FORTUNE magazine survey, as well as rankingranked in the Top 20 among all American companies. We achieved Top 10 among the world’s companies.rankings for “people management” and “management quality”.

 

  For the 21st consecutive year,In 2005, we were ranked “America’s Most Admired” companyin the Top 5 companies inThe Wall Street Journal / Harris Interactive Corporate Reputation Study.

Hispanic Magazinerecognized us in 2005 as a leader in its industry inannual “Corporate 100,” a survey published inlist of companies providing the most opportunities for Hispanics.

In August 2005,FORTUNEBlack Professionals Magazinemagazine in March 2004. named UPS to its “Top 25 Companies for African Americans” list, based on workforce diversity initiatives.

 

  In 2004, we were named one ofDiversityInc magazine’s “Top 50 Companies for Diversity” and “Top 10 Companies for Latinos.”Latinos”.

 

  In 2004, we were ranked number nineninth inComputer World’s “100 Best Places to Work in IT”.

 

Hispanic Magazinerecognized us in 2004 as a leader in its annual “Corporate 100,” a list of companies providing the most opportunities for Hispanics.

We received the National Urban League’s Corporate Leadership Award in 2003 for our long-standing support of the National Urban League.

In 2003, for the fourth consecutive year, we were named a top corporation for women’s business enterprises by the Women’s Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC).

As of December 31, 2004,2005, we had approximately 229,000241,000 employees employed under a national master agreement and various supplemental agreements with local unions affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“Teamsters”). These agreements run through July 31, 2008. The majority of our pilots are employed under a collective bargaining agreement with the Independent Pilots Association, which became amendable January 1, 2004.December 31, 2003. Negotiations are ongoing with the assistance of the National Mediation Board. Our airline mechanics are covered by a collective bargaining agreement with Teamsters Local 2727, which becomes amendable on November 1, 2006. In addition, the majority of our ground mechanics who are not employed under agreements with the Teamsters are employed under collective bargaining agreements with the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. These agreements run through July 31, 2009.

 

We believe that our relations with our employees are good. Every year we survey all our employees to determine their level of job satisfaction. Areas of concern receive management attention as we strive to keep UPS the employer of choice among our employees.

 

Competition

 

We are the largest package delivery company in the world, in terms of both revenue and volume. We offer a broad array of services in the package delivery industry and, therefore, compete with many different companies and services on a local, regional, national and international basis. Our competitors include the postal services of the United States and other nations, various motor carriers, express companies, freight forwarders, air couriers and others.

 

8


Index to Financial Statements

We believe one increasingly important element of competition increasingly is based on a carrier’s ability to integrate its distribution and information systems with its customers’ systems to provide unique transportation solutions at competitive prices. We rely on our vast infrastructure and service portfolio to attract and maintain customers. As we expand our supply chain solutions service offerings, we compete with a number of participants in the supply chain, financial services and information technology industries.

 

Government Regulation

 

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, through the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)(“TSA”), the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)(“DOT”) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)(“FAA”), regulates air transportation services.

 

8


The TSA regulates various security aspects of air cargo transportation in a manner consistent with the TSA mission statement to “protect[s] the Nation’s transportation systems to ensure freedom of movement for people and commerce.”

 

The DOT’s authority primarily relates to economic aspects of air transportation, such as discriminatory pricing, non-competitive practices, interlocking relations and cooperative agreements. The DOT also regulates, subject to the authority of the President of the United States, international routes, fares, rates and practices, and is authorized to investigate and take action against discriminatory treatment of U.S. air carriers abroad. We are subject to U.S. customs laws and related DOT regulations regarding the import and export of shipments to and from the U.S. In addition, our customs brokerage entities are subject to those same laws and regulations as they relate to the filing of documents on behalf of client importers and exporters.

 

The FAA’s authority primarily relates to safety aspects of air transportation, including aircraft standards and maintenance, personnel and ground facilities. In 1988, the FAA granted us an operating certificate, which remains in effect so long as we meet the operational requirements of federal aviation regulations.

 

FAA regulations mandate an aircraft corrosion control program, and aircraft inspection and repair at periodic intervals specified by approved programs and procedures, for all aircraft. Our total expenditures under these programs for 20042005 were about $11$14 million. The future cost of repairs pursuant to these programs may fluctuate. All mandated repairs have been completed, or are scheduled to be completed, within the timeframes specified by the FAA.

 

Our ground transportation of packages in the U.S. is subject to the DOT’s jurisdiction with respect to the regulation of routes and to both the DOT’s and the states’ jurisdiction with respect to the regulation of safety, insurance and hazardous materials.

 

We are subject to similar regulation in many non-U.S. jurisdictions. In addition, we are subject to non-U.S. government regulation of aviation rights to and beyond non-U.S. jurisdictions, and non-U.S. customs regulation.

 

The Postal Reorganization Act of 1970 created the U.S. Postal Service as an independent establishment of the executive branch of the federal government, and vested the power to recommend domestic postal rates in a regulatory body, the Postal Rate Commission. We participate in the proceedings before the Postal Rate Commission in an attempt to secure fair postal rates for competitive services.

 

We are subject to numerous other laws and regulations in connection with our non-package businesses, including customs regulations, Food and Drug Administration regulation of our transportation of pharmaceuticals and state and federal lending regulations.

 

Where You Can Find More Information

 

We make our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to these reports available free of charge through the investor relations page of our website, located atwww.shareholder.com/ups, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC.

 

9


Index to Financial Statements

We have adopted a written Code of Business Conduct that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer and senior financial officers. It is available in the governance section of the investor relations page of our website, located atwww.shareholder.com/ups. In the event that we make changes in, or provide waivers from, the provisions of the Code of Business Conduct that the SEC requires us to disclose, we intend to disclose these events in the governance section of our investor relations website.

 

9


Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are also available free of charge in the governance section of the investor relations page of our website.

 

See Footnote 12 to our consolidated financial statements for financial information regarding our industryreporting segments and geographic areas in which we operate.

 

Item 1A.Executive Officers of the Registrant

Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

Name and Office


  Age

  

Principal Occupation

and Employment For

the Last Five Years


David P. Abney

Senior Vice President and President,

UPS International

  4950  Senior Vice President and President,
UPS International (2003 to present),
UPS/Fritz Companies Integration
Manager (2001 to 2002), UPS
SonicAir® Manager (1995 to 2000).

David A. Barnes

Senior Vice President and Chief

Information Officer

  4950  Senior Vice President and Chief
Information Officer (2005 to present), Corporate IS
Portfolio Coordinator (2001 to 2004), CIM Process
Manager (1998 to 2001).

John J. Beystehner

Senior Vice President, Chief Operating

Officer and President — UPS Airlines

  5354  

Chief Operating Officer and
President — UPS Airlines
(2004 to present), Director (2005 to present),

Senior Vice President (1999 to present),
Marketing Group Manager (2001 to 2003),
Worldwide Sales Group Manager (1997 to 2003).

D. Scott Davis

Senior Vice President, Chief

Financial Officer and Treasurer

  5354  

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and

Treasurer (2001 to present), Director (2006 – present),

Vice President — Finance (2000 to 2001),
Chief Executive Officer of Overseas Partners Ltd.
(1999 to 2000).

Michael L. Eskew

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

  5556  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(2002 to present), Vice Chairman (2000 to 2001),
Executive Vice President (1999 to 2001),
Director (1998 to present), Corporate Development
Group Manager (1999 to 2000),
Senior Vice President (1996 to 1999),
Engineering Group Manager (1996 to 2000).

Allen E. Hill

Senior Vice President and Secretary

49Senior Vice President, Secretary and
Legal and Public Affairs Group Manager
(2004 to present), Corporate Legal Department
Manager (1995 to 2003).

Kurt P. Kuehn

Senior Vice President

  50  

Senior Vice President and Worldwide SalesHuman Resources and Public
MarketingAffairs Group Manager (2006 – present),

Senior Vice President, Secretary and Legal and Public
Affairs Group Manager (2004 to present)– 2006),
Vice President, Investor Relations (1999 to 2003)

Corporate Legal Department Manager (1995 – 2004).

 

10


Index to Financial Statements

Name and Office


  Age

  

Principal Occupation

and Employment For

the Last Five Years


Christopher D. MahoneyKurt P. Kuehn

Senior Vice President

  5751  Senior Vice President (1998 to present), Transportationand Worldwide Sales and
Marketing Group Manager and Labor(2004 – present),
Vice President, Investor Relations Group Manager (2001 to 2005), U.S. Operations Manager (1998 to 2001), Region Manager (1990 to 1998)(1999 – 2003).

John J. McDevitt

Senior Vice President

  4647  Senior Vice President, Transportation
Group Manager and Labor Relations
Group Manager (2005 to present),
Senior Vice President, Strategic Integration
(2003 to 2005), Air Region Manager (2001 to 2002),
Corporate Labor Relations Manager (1997 to 2000).

Lea N. SoupataTeri P. McClure

Senior Vice President and DirectorSecretary

  5442  Senior Vice President, General Counsel and HumanSecretary
Resources(2006 – present), Corporate Legal Department Manager
(2005 – 2006), District Manager (2003 – 2005),
and Vice President (1999 – 2003).

Christine M. Owens

Senior Vice President

50Senior Vice President, Communications and
Brand Group Manager (2005 – present),
Corporate Transportation Group Manager
(1995 to present)2004 – 2005), Director (1998 to present)and Region Manager (1997 – 2004).

Robert E. Stoffel

Senior Vice President

  4950  Senior Vice President of Supply Chain
Group (2004 to present),
President, UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
(2002 to 2003), Vice President,
UPS Logistics Group, Inc. (2000 to 2002),
Department Manager (1995 to 2000).

James F. Winestock

Senior Vice President

  5354  Senior Vice President and
U.S. Operations Manager (2004 to present),
Region Manager (1998 to 2003).

Item 1A.Risk Factors

Information about risk factors can be found in Item 7 of this report under the caption “Risk Factors”.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

 

Item 2.Properties

 

Operating Facilities

 

We own our headquarters, which are located in Atlanta, Georgia and consist of about 735,000 square feet of office space on an office campus, and our UPS Supply Chain Solutions group’s headquarters, which are located in Alpharetta, Georgia and consist of about 310,000 square feet of office space.

 

We also own our 27 principal U.S. package operating facilities, which have floor spaces that range from about 310,000 to 693,000 square feet. In addition, we have a 1.9 million square foot operating facility near Chicago, Illinois, which is designed to streamline shipments between East Coast and West Coast destinations, and we own or lease over 1,000 additional smaller package operating facilities in the U.S. The smaller of these facilities have vehicles and drivers stationed for the pickup of packages and facilities for the sorting, transfer and delivery of packages. The larger of these facilities also service our vehicles and equipment and employ specialized mechanical installations for the sorting and handling of packages.

 

11


Index to Financial Statements

We own or lease almost 600 facilities that support our international package operations and over 1,0901,000 facilities that support our non-packagefreight forwarding and logistics operations. Our non-packagefreight forwarding and logistics operations maintain facilities with about 3035 million square feet of floor space. We own and operate a logistics campus consisting of approximately 3.5 million square feet in Louisville, Kentucky.

 

We believe that our facilitiesUPS Freight operates over 200 service centers with a total of 4.3 million square feet of floor space. UPS Freight owns 170 of these service centers, while the remainder are adequate to support our current operations.occupied under operating lease agreements.

 

11


Our aircraft are operated in a hub and spokes pattern in the U.S. Our principal air hub in the U.S., known as Worldport, is located in Louisville, KY. The Worldport facility consists of over 3.5 million square feet and the site includes approximately 350 acres. We are able to sort over 300,000 packages per hour in the Worldport facility. We also have regional air hubs in Columbia, SC; Dallas, TX; Dayton, OH,OH; Hartford, CT; Ontario, CA; Philadelphia, PA; and Rockford, IL. These hubs house facilities for the sorting, transfer and delivery of packages. In February 2005, we announced our intention to transfer operations currently taking place at the former Menlo Worldwide Forwarding air freight facility in Dayton, OH to other UPS facilities, overincluding a facility consisting of approximately 12715,000 square feet in Louisville and five regional air freight facilities in Ontario, CA; Rockford, IL; Dallas, TX; Philadelphia, PA; and Columbia, SC. Each of these facilities is under construction and is expected to 18 months. We are currently evaluating our plans for this facility, including potential alternate uses or closure.be completed in 2006. Our European air hub is located in Cologne, Germany, and our Asia-Pacific air hub is located in Taipei, Taiwan. Our intra-Asia air hub is located at Clark Air Force Base in Pampanga, Philippines, and our regional air hub in Canada is located in Hamilton, Ontario.

 

Our computer operations are consolidated in a 435,000 square foot owned facility, the Ramapo Ridge facility, which is located on a 39-acre site in Mahwah, New Jersey. We also own a 175,000 square foot facility located on a 25-acre site in Alpharetta, Georgia, which serves as a backup to the main computer operations facility in New Jersey. This facility provides production functions and backup capacity in the event that a power outage or other disaster incapacitates the main data center. It also helps us to meet communication needs.

 

We believe that our facilities are adequate to support our current operations.

Fleet

 

Aircraft

 

The following table shows information about our aircraft fleet as of December 31, 2004:2005:

 

Description


  Owned and
Capital
Leases


  Short-term
Leased or
Chartered
From
Others


  On
Order


  Under
Option


  Owned and
Capital
Leases


  Short-term
Leased or
Chartered
From
Others


  On
Order


  Under
Option


McDonnell-Douglas DC-8-71

  21  —    —    —    21  —    —    —  

McDonnell-Douglas DC-8-73

  26  —    —    —    26  —    —    —  

Boeing 727-100

  44  —    —    —    32  —    —    —  

Boeing 727-200

  2  —    —    —    2  —    —    —  

Boeing 747-100

  9  —    —    —    8  —    —    —  

Boeing 747-200

  4  1  —    —    4  —    —    —  

Boeing 747-400F

  —    —    8  —  

Boeing 747-400SF

  —    —    2  —  

Boeing 757-200

  75  —    —    —    75  —    —    —  

Boeing 767-300

  32  —    —    —    32  —    —    —  

Boeing MD-11

  15  —    2  —    21  —    13  —  

Airbus A300-600

  40  —    13  —    47  —    6  —  

Airbus A380-800

  —    —    10  10  —    —    10  10

Other

  —    300  —    —    —    309  —    —  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

Total

  268  301  25  10  268  309  39  10
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

 

12


Index to Financial Statements

We maintain an inventory of spare engines and parts for each aircraft.

 

All of the aircraft we own meet Stage III federal noise regulations and can operate at airports that have aircraft noise restrictions. We became the first major airline to successfully operate a 100% Stage III fleet more than three years in advance of the date required by federal regulations.

 

During 2004,2005, we took delivery of threesix Boeing MD-11 aircraft and eightseven Airbus A300-600 aircraft. The final six firm Airbus A300-600 aircraft are scheduled for delivery by July 2006. We have firm commitments to purchase two13 Boeing MD-11 aircraft, in 2005, and we expect to take delivery of an additional four Boeing MD-11these aircraft during 2005.2006 and 2007. In December 2004,2005, we amended our existingmade firm commitments to purchase eight Boeing 747-400F aircraft purchase agreement with Airbus. The amended agreement reduced our purchase commitmentscheduled for Airbus A300-600 from 50 to 13delivery during 2007 and 2008, and two Boeing 747-400SF aircraft and reduced the number of aircraft options from 37 to zero.scheduled for delivery during 2008. In addition, we have a firm commitment to purchase 10 Airbus A380 aircraft and options to purchase 10 additional A380

12


aircraft. The Airbus A300-600 aircraft are expected to be delivered by July 2006, and the A380 aircraft deliveries are expected to be deliveredscheduled between 2009 and 2012. In 2005, we expect to take deliveryThese aircraft purchase orders will provide for the replacement of seven Airbus A300-600 aircraft.existing capacity and anticipated future growth.

 

Vehicles

 

We operate a ground fleet of more than 88,000approximately 98,000 package cars, vans, tractors and motorcycles.

 

Our ground support fleet consists of over 25,00026,000 pieces of equipment designed specifically to support our aircraft fleet, ranging from non-powered container dollies and racks to powered aircraft main deck loaders and cargo tractors. We also have about 40,00041,000 containers used to transport cargo in our aircraft.

 

Safety

 

We promote safety throughout our operations.

 

Our Automotive Fleet Safety Program is built with the following components:

 

  Selection.Five out of every six drivers come from our part-time ranks. Therefore, many of our new drivers are familiar with our philosophies, policies, practices and training programs.

 

  Training.Training is the cornerstone of our Fleet Safety Program. Our approach starts with training the trainer. All trainers are certified to ensure that they have the skills and motivation to effectively train novice drivers. A new driver’s employment includes five hours of classroom training and 15 hours of on-road training, followed by three safety training rides integrated into his or her training cycle.

 

  Responsibility.Our operations managers are responsible for their drivers’ safety records. We investigate every accident. If we determine that an accident could have been prevented, we retrain the driver.

 

  Preventive Maintenance.An integral part of our Fleet Safety Program is a comprehensive Preventive Maintenance Program. Our fleet is tracked by computer to ensure that each vehicle is serviced before a breakdown or accident is likely to occur.

 

  Honor Plan.A well-defined safe driver honor plan recognizes and rewards our drivers when they achieve success. We have over 3,600 drivers who have driven for 25 years or more without an avoidable accident.

 

Our workplace safety program is built upon a comprehensive health and safety process. The foundation of this process is our employee-management health and safety committees. The workplace safety process focuses on employee conditioning and safety-related habits. Our employee co-chaired health and safety committees complete comprehensive facility audits and injury analyses, and recommend facility and work process changes.

 

13


Index to Financial Statements
Item 3.Legal Proceedings

 

On August 9, 1999, the United States Tax Court held that we were liable for tax on income of Overseas Partners Ltd., a Bermuda company that had reinsured excess value (“EV”) package insurance purchased by our customers beginning in 1984, and that we were liable for additional tax for the 1983 and 1984 tax years. The IRS took similar positions to those advanced in the Tax Court decision for tax years subsequent to 1984 through 1998. On June 20, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled in our favor and reversed the Tax Court decision. In January 2003, we and the IRS finalized settlement of all outstanding tax issues related to EV package insurance. Under the terms of settlement, we agreed to adjustments that will result in income tax due of approximately $562 million, additions to tax of $60 million and related interest. The amount due to the IRS as a result of the settlement is less than amounts we previously had accrued. As a result, we recorded income, before taxes, of $1.023 billion ($776 million after tax) during the fourth quarter of 2002. In the first quarter of 2004, we received a refund of $185 million pertaining to the 1983 and 1984 tax years.

13


The IRS had proposed adjustments, unrelated to the EV package insurance matters discussed above, regarding the allowance of deductions and certain losses, the characterization of expenses as capital rather than ordinary, the treatment of certain income, and our entitlement to tax credits in the 1985 through 1998 tax years. In the third quarter of 2004, we settled all outstanding issues related to each of the tax years 1991 through 1998. In the fourth quarter of 2004, we received a refund of $425 million pertaining to the 1991 through 1998 tax years. We expect to receive the $371 million of refunds related to the 1985 through 1990 tax years within the next six months.

The IRS may take similar positions with respect to some of the non-EV package insurance matters for each of the years 1999 through 2004. If challenged, we expect that we will prevail on substantially all of these issues. Specifically, we believe that our practice of expensing the items that the IRS alleges should have been capitalized is consistent with the practices of other industry participants. We believe that the eventual resolution of these issues will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

We were named as a defendant in twenty-threetwenty-six now-dismissed lawsuits that sought to hold us liable for the collection of premiums for EVreinsured excess value (“EV”) insurance in connection with package shipments since 1984. Based on state and federal tort, contract and statutory claims, these cases generally claimed that we failed to remit collected EV premiums to an independent insurer; we failed to provide promised EV insurance; we acted as an insurer without complying with state insurance laws and regulations; and the price for EV insurance was excessive. These actions were all filed after thean August 9, 1999 U.S. Tax Court decision discussed above, whichthat the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit later reversed.

These twenty-threetwenty-six cases were consolidated for pre-trial purposes in a multi-district litigation proceeding (“MDL Proceeding”) in federal court in New York. In addition to the cases in which UPS was named as a defendant, there also was an action, Smith v. Mail Boxes Etc., against Mail Boxes Etc. and its franchisees relating to UPS EV insurance and related services purchased through Mail Boxes Etc. centers. That case also was consolidated into the MDL Proceeding.

 

In late 2003, the parties reached a global settlement resolving all claims and all cases in the MDL proceeding.Proceeding. In reaching the settlement, we and the other defendants expressly denied any and all liability. On July 30, 2004, the court issued an order granting final approval to the substantive terms of the settlement. No appeals were filed and the settlement became effective on September 8, 2004.

 

Pursuant to the settlement, UPS has provided qualifying settlement class members with vouchers toward the purchase of specified UPS services and willagreed to pay the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees the total amount of which still remains to be determined by the court.and costs. Other defendants have contributed to the costs of the litigation and settlement. The vouchers expired in July 2005 and the value of services for which vouchers were redeemed totaled $5 million. On November 2, 2005, the court issued an order awarding plaintiffs’ counsel fees and costs in the total amount of $3 million. The settlement including the attorneys’ fees. The ultimate cost to us of the proposed settlement will depend on a number of factors, including how many vouchers settlement class members actually use. We dodid not believe that this proposed settlement will have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

 

We are a defendant in a number of lawsuits filed in state and federal courts containing various class-action allegations under state wage-and-hour laws. In one of these cases, Marlo v. UPS, which has been certified as a class action in a California statefederal court, plaintiffs allege that they improperly were denied overtime, and seek penalties for missed meal and rest periods, and interest and attorneys’ fees. Plaintiffs purport to represent a class of 1,200 full-time supervisors.

 

We have denied any liability with respect to these claims and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in these cases. At this time, we have not determined the amount of any liability that may result from these matters or whether such liability, if any, would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

 

In addition, we are a defendant in various other lawsuits that arose in the normal course of business. We believe that the eventual resolution of these cases will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

 

14


We participate in a number of trustee-managed multi-employer pension and health and welfare plans for employees covered under collective bargaining agreements. Several factors could result in potential funding deficiencies which could cause us to make significantly higher future contributions to these plans, including unfavorable investment performance, changes in demographics, and increased benefits to participants. At this time, we are unable to determine the amount of additional future contributions, if any, or whether any material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows could result from our participation in these plans.

Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

None

 

1514


Index to Financial Statements

PART II

 

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Our Class A common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or traded in an organized over-the-counter market, but each share of our Class A common stock is convertible into one share of our Class B common stock.

 

The following is a summary of our Class B common stock price activity and dividend information for 20042005 and 2003.2004. Our Class B common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “UPS.”

 

  High

  Low

  Close

  

Dividends

Declared


  High

  Low

  Close

  

Dividends

Declared


2005:

            

First Quarter

  $85.84  $71.59  $72.74  $0.33

Second Quarter

  $75.88  $66.80  $69.16  $0.33

Third Quarter

  $74.21  $66.75  $69.13  $0.33

Fourth Quarter

  $79.97  $66.90  $75.15  $0.33

2004:

                        

First Quarter

  $74.46  $67.51  $69.84  $0.28  $74.46  $67.51  $69.84  $0.28

Second Quarter

  $75.26  $68.57  $75.17  $0.28  $75.26  $68.57  $75.17  $0.28

Third Quarter

  $76.00  $69.15  $75.92  $0.28  $76.00  $69.15  $75.92  $0.28

Fourth Quarter

  $87.70  $75.76  $85.46  $0.28  $87.70  $75.76  $85.46  $0.28

2003:

            

First Quarter

  $64.48  $53.00  $57.00  $0.21

Second Quarter

  $64.32  $56.52  $63.70  $0.21

Third Quarter

  $64.99  $61.17  $63.80  $0.25

Fourth Quarter

  $74.86  $63.76  $74.55  $0.25

 

As of February 28, 2005,21, 2006, there were 168,651171,893 and 15,72816,611 record holders of Class A and Class B common stock, respectively.

 

The policy of our Board of Directors is to declare dividends each year out of current earnings. The declaration of future dividends is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors in light of all relevant facts, including earnings, general business conditions and working capital requirements.

 

On February 9, 2005,2006, our Board declared a dividend of $0.33$0.38 per share, which was payable on March 9, 20057, 2006 to shareowners of record on February 22, 2005.21, 2006.

 

In May 2004, a total of $1.0 billion was authorized for share repurchases as part of our continuing share repurchase program. In October 2004,August 2005, the Board of Directors authorized an increase in our share repurchase program of $2.0 billion. This amount was in addition to the remaining authority available under the previously authorized $2.0 billion share repurchase program approved in October 2004. As of December 31, 2005, we had a total of $2.0$1.338 billion which superceded any previousin remaining authority available under our share repurchase authorization.program. Unless terminated earlier by the resolution of our Board, the program will expire when we have purchased all shares authorized for repurchase under the program.

 

16


A summary of repurchases of our Class A and Class B common stock during the fourth quarter of 20042005 is as follows (in millions, except per share amounts):

 

  

Total Number

of Shares

Purchased(1)


 

Average

Price Paid

Per Share(1)


 

Total Number

of Shares Purchased

as Part of Publicly

Announced Program


 

Approximate Dollar

Value of Shares that

May Yet be Purchased

Under the Program


October 1 – October 20, 2004

 0.2 $77.72 0.2 $459

October 21 – October 31, 2004

 0.6  77.72 0.6  1,954

November 1 – November 30, 2004

 0.3  82.91 0.2  1,937

December 1 – December 31, 2004

 1.4  86.25 1.4  1,817
  
 

 
 

Total October 1 – December 31, 2004

 2.5 $83.02 2.4 $1,817
  
 

 
 

  

Total Number

of Shares

Purchased(1)


 

Average

Price Paid

Per Share(1)


 

Total Number

of Shares Purchased

as Part of Publicly

Announced Program


 

Approximate Dollar

Value of Shares that

May Yet be Purchased

Under the Program


October 1 – October 31, 2005

 2.1 $69.88 2.0 $1,722

November 1 – November 30, 2005

 2.0  75.35 1.9  1,578

December 1 – December 31, 2005

 3.2  76.17 3.2  1,338
  
 

 
 

Total October 1 – December 31, 2005

 7.3 $74.15 7.1 $1,338
  
 

 
 


(1)Includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options.

 

1715


Index to Financial Statements
Item 6.Selected Financial Data

 

The following table sets forth selected financial data for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 20042005 (amounts in millions, except per share amounts). This financial data should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and other financial data appearing elsewhere in this report.

 

  Years Ended December 31,

   Years Ended December 31,

 
  2004

 2003

 2002

 2001

 2000

   2005

 2004

 2003

 2002

 2001

 

Selected Income Statement Data

      

Revenue:

      

U.S. domestic package

  $26,610  $25,022  $23,924  $23,997  $24,002 

International package

   6,762   5,561   4,680   4,245   4,078 

Non-package

   3,210   2,902   2,668   2,079   1,418 

U.S. Domestic Package

  $28,610  $26,960  $25,362  $24,280  $24,391 

International Package

   7,977   6,809   5,609   4,720   4,280 

Supply Chain and Freight

   5,994   2,813   2,514   2,272   1,650 
  


 


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


 


Total revenue

   36,582   33,485   31,272   30,321   29,498    42,581   36,582   33,485   31,272   30,321 

Operating expenses:

      

Compensation and benefits

   20,916   19,328   17,940   17,397   16,546    22,517   20,823   19,251   17,849   17,311 

Other

   10,677   9,712   9,236   8,962   8,440    13,921   10,770   9,789   9,327   9,048 
  


 


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


 


Total operating expenses

   31,593   29,040   27,176   26,359   24,986    36,438   31,593   29,040   27,176   26,359 

Operating profit (loss):

      

U.S. domestic package

   3,345   3,272   3,576   3,620   3,929 

International package

   1,121   709   322   125   277 

Non-package

   523   464   198   217   306 

U.S. Domestic Package

   4,493   3,702   3,657   3,925   3,969 

International Package

   1,494   1,149   732   338   139 

Supply Chain and Freight

   156   138   56   (167)  (146)
  


 


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


 


Total operating profit

   4,989   4,445   4,096   3,962   4,512    6,143   4,989   4,445   4,096   3,962 

Other income (expense):

      

Investment income

   82   18   63   159   527    104   82   18   63   159 

Interest expense

   (149)  (121)  (173)  (184)  (205)   (172)  (149)  (121)  (173)  (184)

Gain on redemption of long-term debt

   —     28   —     —     —      —     —     28   —     —   

Tax assessment

   —     —     1,023   —     —   

Reversal of tax assessment

   —     —     —     1,023   —   
  


 


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


 


Income before income taxes

   4,922   4,370   5,009   3,937   4,834    6,075   4,922   4,370   5,009   3,937 

Income taxes

   (1,589)  (1,472)  (1,755)  (1,512)  (1,900)   (2,205)  (1,589)  (1,472)  (1,755)  (1,512)

Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles

   —     —     (72)  (26)  —      —     —     —     (72)  (26)
  


 


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


 


Net income

  $3,333  $2,898  $3,182  $2,399  $2,934   $3,870  $3,333  $2,898  $3,182  $2,399 
  


 


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


 


Per share amounts:

      

Basic earnings per share

  $2.95  $2.57  $2.84  $2.13  $2.54   $3.48  $2.95  $2.57  $2.84  $2.13 

Diluted earnings per share

  $2.93  $2.55  $2.81  $2.10  $2.50   $3.47  $2.93  $2.55  $2.81  $2.10 

Dividends declared per share

  $1.12  $0.92  $0.76  $0.76  $0.68   $1.32  $1.12  $0.92  $0.76  $0.76 

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

   

Weighted average shares outstanding:

   

Basic

   1,129   1,128   1,120   1,126   1,153    1,113   1,129   1,128   1,120   1,126 

Diluted

   1,137   1,138   1,134   1,144   1,175    1,116   1,137   1,138   1,134   1,144 
  As of December 31,

   As of December 31,

 
  2004

 2003

 2002

 2001

 2000

   2005

 2004

 2003

 2002

 2001

 

Selected Balance Sheet Data

      

Working capital

  $6,122  $4,335  $3,183  $2,811  $2,623 

Cash and marketable securities

  $3,041  $5,197  $3,952  $3,014  $1,616 

Total assets

   35,222   33,088   29,734   26,868   24,636 

Long-term debt

   3,261   3,149   3,495   4,648   2,981    3,159   3,261   3,149   3,495   4,648 

Total assets

   33,026   29,734   26,868   24,636   21,662 

Shareowners’ equity

   16,384   14,852   12,455   10,248   9,735    16,884   16,378   14,852   12,455   10,248 

 

1816


Index to Financial Statements
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Operations

 

The following tables set forth information showing the change in revenue, average daily package volume, and average revenue per piece, both in dollars or amounts and in percentage terms:

 

  Year Ended
December 31,


  Change

   Year Ended
December 31,


  Change

 
  2004

  2003

  $

 %

   2005

  2004

  $

 %

 

Revenue (in millions):

                  

U.S. domestic package:

         

U.S. Domestic Package:

         

Next Day Air

  $6,040  $5,580  $460  8.2%  $6,381  $6,084  $297  4.9%

Deferred

   3,161   2,982   179  6.0    3,258   3,193   65  2.0 

Ground

   17,409   16,460   949  5.8    18,971   17,683   1,288  7.3 
  

  

  


   

  

  


 

Total U.S. domestic package

   26,610   25,022   1,588  6.3 

International package:

         

Total U.S. Domestic Package

   28,610   26,960   1,650  6.1 

International Package:

         

Domestic

   1,346   1,134   212  18.7    1,588   1,346   242  18.0 

Export

   4,944   4,001   943  23.6    5,856   4,991   865  17.3 

Cargo

   472   426   46  10.8    533   472   61  12.9 
  

  

  


   

  

  


 

Total International package

   6,762   5,561   1,201  21.6 

Non-package:

         

UPS Supply Chain Solutions

   2,346   2,126   220  10.3 

Total International Package

   7,977   6,809   1,168  17.2 

Supply Chain and Freight:

         

Forwarding Services and Logistics

   4,737   2,379   2,358  99.1 

UPS Freight

   797   —     797  N/A 

Other

   864   776   88  11.3    460   434   26  6.0 
  

  

  


   

  

  


 

Total Non-package

   3,210   2,902   308  10.6 

Total Supply Chain and Freight

   5,994   2,813   3,181  113.1 
  

  

  


   

  

  


 

Consolidated

  $36,582  $33,485  $3,097  9.2%  $42,581  $36,582  $5,999  16.4%
  

  

  


   

  

  


 
Average Daily Package Volume (in thousands):        #

         #

 

U.S. domestic package:

         

U.S. Domestic Package:

         

Next Day Air

   1,194   1,185   9  0.8%   1,228   1,194   34  2.8%

Deferred

   910   918   (8) (0.9)   946   910   36  4.0 

Ground

   10,676   10,268   408  4.0    11,044   10,676   368  3.4 
  

  

  


   

  

  


 

Total U.S. domestic package

   12,780   12,371   409  3.3 

International package:

         

Total U.S. Domestic Package

   13,218   12,780   438  3.4 

International Package:

         

Domestic

   815   786   29  3.7    916   815   101  12.4 

Export

   541   481   60  12.5    616   541   75  13.9 
  

  

  


   

  

  


 

Total International package

   1,356   1,267   89  7.0 

Total International Package

   1,532   1,356   176  13.0 
  

  

  


   

  

  


 

Consolidated

   14,136   13,638   498  3.7%   14,750   14,136   614  4.3%
  

  

  


   

  

  


 

Operating days in period

   254   252      254   254   

Average Revenue Per Piece:

                 $

 
U.S. domestic package:        $

 

U.S. Domestic Package:

         

Next Day Air

  $19.92  $18.69  $1.23  6.6%  $20.46  $20.06  $0.40  2.0%

Deferred

   13.68   12.89   0.79  6.1    13.56   13.81   (0.25) (1.8)

Ground

   6.42   6.36   0.06  0.9    6.76   6.52   0.24  3.7 

Total U.S. domestic package

   8.20   8.03   0.17  2.1 

International package:

         

Total U.S. Domestic Package

   8.52   8.31   0.21  2.5 

International Package:

         

Domestic

   6.50   5.73   0.77  13.4    6.83   6.50   0.33  5.1 

Export

   35.98   33.01   2.97  9.0    37.43   36.32   1.11  3.1 

Total International package

   18.26   16.08   2.18  13.6 

Total International Package

   19.13   18.40   0.73  4.0 

Consolidated

  $9.16  $8.77  $0.39  4.4%  $9.62  $9.27  $0.35  3.8%
  

  

  


   

  

  


 

 

1917


   

Year Ended

December 31,


  Change

 
   2003

  2002

  $

  %

 

Revenue (in millions):

                

U.S. domestic package:

                

Next Day Air

  $5,580  $5,349  $231  4.3%

Deferred

   2,982   2,868   114  4.0 

Ground

   16,460   15,707   753  4.8 
   

  

  


   

Total U.S. domestic package

   25,022   23,924   1,098  4.6 

International package:

                

Domestic

   1,134   943   191  20.3 

Export

   4,001   3,276   725  22.1 

Cargo

   426   461   (35) (7.6)
   

  

  


   

Total International package

   5,561   4,680   881  18.8 

Non-package:

                

UPS Supply Chain Solutions

   2,126   1,969   157  8.0 

Other

   776   699   77  11.0 
   

  

  


   

Total Non-package

   2,902   2,668   234  8.8 
   

  

  


   

Consolidated

  $33,485  $31,272  $2,213  7.1%
   

  

  


   
Average Daily Package Volume (in thousands):        #

    

U.S. domestic package:

                

Next Day Air

   1,185   1,111   74  6.7%

Deferred

   918   895   23  2.6 

Ground

   10,268   10,112   156  1.5 
   

  

  


   

Total U.S. domestic package

   12,371   12,118   253  2.1 

International package:

                

Domestic

   786   779   7  0.9 

Export

   481   443   38  8.6 
   

  

  


   

Total International package

   1,267   1,222   45  3.7 
   

  

  


   

Consolidated

   13,638   13,340   298  2.2%
   

  

  


   

Operating days in period

   252   252        

Average Revenue Per Piece:

                
U.S. domestic package:        $

    

Next Day Air

  $18.69  $19.11  $(0.42) (2.2)%

Deferred

   12.89   12.72   0.17  1.3 

Ground

   6.36   6.16   0.20  3.2 

Total U.S. domestic package

   8.03   7.83   0.20  2.6 

International package:

                

Domestic

   5.73   4.80   0.93  19.4 

Export

   33.01   29.35   3.66  12.5 

Total International package

   16.08   13.70   2.38  17.4 

Consolidated

  $8.77  $8.37  $0.40  4.8%
   

  

  


   
Index to Financial Statements
   

Year Ended

December 31,


  Change

 
   2004

  2003

  $

  %

 

Revenue (in millions):

                

U.S. Domestic Package:

                

Next Day Air

  $6,084  $5,621  $463  8.2%

Deferred

   3,193   3,015   178  5.9 

Ground

   17,683   16,726   957  5.7 
   

  

  


   

Total U.S. Domestic Package

   26,960   25,362   1,598  6.3 

International Package:

                

Domestic

   1,346   1,134   212  18.7 

Export

   4,991   4,049   942  23.3 

Cargo

   472   426   46  10.8 
   

  

  


   

Total International Package

   6,809   5,609   1,200  21.4 

Supply Chain and Freight:

                

Forwarding Services and Logistics

   2,379   2,126   253  11.9 

UPS Freight

   —     —     —    —   

Other

   434   388   46  11.9 
   

  

  


   

Total Supply Chain and Freight

   2,813   2,514   299  11.9 
   

  

  


   

Consolidated

  $36,582  $33,485  $3,097  9.2%
   

  

  


   
Average Daily Package Volume (in thousands):        #

    

U.S. Domestic Package:

                

Next Day Air

   1,194   1,185   9  0.8%

Deferred

   910   918   (8) (0.9)

Ground

   10,676   10,268   408  4.0 
   

  

  


   

Total U.S. Domestic Package

   12,780   12,371   409  3.3 

International Package:

                

Domestic

   815   786   29  3.7 

Export

   541   481   60  12.5 
   

  

  


   

Total International Package

   1,356   1,267   89  7.0 
   

  

  


   

Consolidated

   14,136   13,638   498  3.7%
   

  

  


   

Operating days in period

   254   252        
Average Revenue Per Piece:        $

    

U.S. Domestic Package:

                

Next Day Air

  $20.06  $18.82  $1.24  6.6%

Deferred

   13.81   13.03   0.78  6.0 

Ground

   6.52   6.46   0.06  0.9 

Total U.S. Domestic Package

   8.31   8.14   0.17  2.1 

International Package:

                

Domestic

   6.50   5.73   0.77  13.4 

Export

   36.32   33.40   2.92  8.7 

Total International Package

   18.40   16.23   2.17  13.4 

Consolidated

  $9.27  $8.89  $0.38  4.3%
   

  

  


   

 

2018


Index to Financial Statements

The following table sets forth information showing the change in UPS Freight’s less-than-truckload revenue, shipments, and weight hauled, both in dollars or amounts and in percentage terms:

   

Year Ended

December 31,


  Change

  2005

      2004    

  $

      %    

LTL revenue (in millions)

  $690  —    $690  N/A

LTL revenue per LTL hundredweight

  $17.35  —    $17.35  N/A

LTL shipments (in thousands)

   4,126  —     4,126  N/A

LTL shipments per day (in thousands)

   41  —     41  N/A

LTL gross weight hauled (in millions of pounds)

   3,978  —     3,978  N/A

LTL weight per shipment

   964  —     964  N/A

Overnite Corp., now known as UPS Freight, was acquired on August 5, 2005. The information presented above reflects the performance of Overnite for the period subsequent to the date of acquisition.

Operating Profit and Operating Margin

 

The following tables set forth information showing the change in operating profit, both in dollars (in millions) and in percentage terms:terms, as well as the operating margin for each reporting segment:

 

   Year Ended
December 31,


  Change

 
  2004

  2003

  $

  %

 

Operating Segment

                

U.S. domestic package

  $3,345  $3,272  $73  2.2%

International package

   1,121   709   412  58.1 

Non-package

   523   464   59  12.7 
   

  

  


   

Consolidated Operating Profit

  $4,989  $4,445  $544  12.2%
   

  

  


   
   Year Ended
December 31,


  Change

 
   2003

  2002

  $

  %

 

Operating Segment

                

U.S. domestic package

  $3,272  $3,576  $(304) (8.5)%

International package

   709   322   387  120.2 

Non-package

   464   198   266  134.3 
   

  

  


   

Consolidated Operating Profit

  $4,445  $4,096  $349  8.5%
   

  

  


   
   

Year Ended

December 31,


  Change

 
  2005

  2004

  $

  %

 

Reporting Segment

                

U.S. Domestic Package

  $4,493  $3,702  $791  21.4%

International Package

   1,494   1,149   345  30.0 

Supply Chain & Freight

   156   138   18  13.0 
   

  

  

    

Consolidated Operating Profit

  $6,143  $4,989  $1,154  23.1%
   

  

  

    
   

Year Ended

December 31,


  Change

 
   2004

  2003

  $

  %

 

Reporting Segment

                

U.S. Domestic Package

  $3,702  $3,657  $45  1.2%

International Package

   1,149   732   417  57.0 

Supply Chain & Freight

   138   56   82  146.4 
   

  

  

    

Consolidated Operating Profit

  $4,989  $4,445  $544  12.2%
   

  

  

    

 

   Year Ended December 31,

 
   2005

  2004

  2003

 

Reporting Segment

          

U.S. Domestic Package

  15.7% 13.7% 14.4%

International Package

  18.7% 16.9% 13.1%

Supply Chain & Freight

  2.6% 4.9% 2.2%

Consolidated Operating Margin

  14.4% 13.6% 13.3%

19


Index to Financial Statements

U.S. Domestic Package Operations

2005 compared to 2004

U.S. Domestic Package revenue increased $1.650 billion, or 6.1%, for the year, primarily due to a 3.4% increase in average daily package volume and a 2.5% increase in revenue per piece. Ground volume grew 3.4%, and was positively impacted by a solid U.S. economy and our focus on middle market sales initiatives. Next Day Air volume grew 2.8% and deferred volume increased 4.0%, with growth in the manufacturing, business services, telecommunications and retail sectors. The growth in total U.S. Domestic Package volume strengthened throughout the year.

Ground revenue per piece increased 3.7% for the year, primarily due to the impact of a rate increase that took effect in 2005, as well as the implementation of a fuel surcharge on ground products. Next Day Air revenue per piece increased 2.0% for the year, primarily due to the rate increase and an increased fuel surcharge rate in 2005 compared to 2004. Next Day Air revenue per piece was adversely affected by relatively higher growth in our Saver product. Both Next Day Air and deferred revenue per piece were adversely affected by lighter average package weights.

On January 3, 2005, a rate increase took effect which was in line with previous years’ rate increases. We increased rates 2.9% on UPS Next Day Air, UPS 2nd Day Air, UPS 3 Day Select, and UPS Ground. Other pricing changes included an increase of $0.25 for delivery area surcharge on both residential and commercial services to certain ZIP codes. The residential surcharge increased $0.10 for UPS Ground services and $0.35 for UPS Next Day Air, UPS 2nd Day Air and UPS 3 Day Select.

In January 2005, we modified the fuel surcharge on domestic air services by setting a maximum cap of 9.50%, which was increased to 12.50% effective in October 2005. This fuel surcharge continues to be based on the U.S. Energy Department’s Gulf Coast spot price for a gallon of kerosene-type jet fuel. Based on published rates, the average fuel surcharge on domestic air products was 10.23% in 2005, as compared with 7.07% in 2004. Additionally, an initial fuel surcharge of 2.00% was applied to UPS Ground services in January 2005, which fluctuates based on the U.S. Energy Department’s On-Highway Diesel Fuel Price. Based on published rates, the average fuel surcharge on domestic ground products was 2.90% in 2005. Total domestic fuel surcharge revenue increased by $683 million for the year, due to higher jet and diesel fuel prices, volume increases, and the modifications to our fuel surcharges noted above. These fuel surcharges are used to provide some protection against the increased fuel expense that we incur due to higher fuel prices, as well as the increased purchased transportation expense which is also affected by higher fuel prices.

U.S. Domestic Package operating profit increased $791 million, or 21.4%, for the year, and domestic operating margin increased by 200 basis points. Operating profit increased by $274 million due to a change in our Management Incentive Awards program (discussed below in “Operating Expenses”), which also favorably impacted the operating margin. The remaining increase in operating profit and margin resulted from the revenue growth described previously, as well as controlled growth of operating expenses.

 

2004 compared to 2003

 

U.S. domestic packageDomestic Package revenue increased $1.588$1.598 billion, or 6.3%, for the year, which resulted from a 3.3% increase in average daily package volume and a 2.1% increase in revenue per piece. Ground volume increased 4.0% during the year, driven in part by the improving U.S. economy, and reflects growth in both commercial and residential deliveries. Ground volume increased 4.8% during the first nine months of the year, but slowed to 1.5% during the fourth quarter. Total Next Day Air volume (up 0.8%) and total deferred volume (down 0.9%) were both significantly affected by declines in letter volume, but offset by an increase in Next Day Air package volume. The 2004 decline in Next Day Air and deferred letter volume is largely due to the slowdown in mortgage refinancing, which was notably strong in 2003.

 

20


Index to Financial Statements

Ground revenue per piece increased 0.9% for the year primarily due to the impact of a rate increase that took effect in 2004, but growth was adversely impacted by approximately 130 basis points due to the removal of the fuel surcharge on ground products, as discussed below. Next Day Air revenue per piece increased 6.6%, while deferred revenue per piece increased 6.1%6.0%, primarily due to the shift in product mix from letters to packages, the rate increase, and the modified fuel surcharge on domestic air products.

 

On January 5, 2004, a rate increase took effect which was in line with previous years’ rate increases. Wewe increased rates for standard ground shipments by an average of 1.9% for commercial deliveries. The ground residential surcharge increased $0.25 to $1.40 over the commercial ground rate. An additional delivery area surcharge of $1.00 was implemented for commercial deliveries in certain ZIP codes. Rates for UPS Hundredweight increased 5.9%. In addition, we increased rates for UPS Next Day Air an average of 2.9% and increased rates for deferred services by 2.9%.

 

In addition, in 2004 we discontinued the fuel surcharge on ground products, while we began to apply a new indexed surcharge to domestic air products. This indexed fuel surcharge for the domestic air products is based on the U.S. Energy Department’s Gulf Coast spot price for a gallon of kerosene-type jet fuel. Based on published rates, the

21


average fuel surcharge applied to our air products during 2004 was 7.07%, compared with the average surcharge of 1.47% applied to both air and ground products in 2003, resulting in an increase in domestic fuel surcharge revenue of $290 million during the year.

 

U.S. domestic packageDomestic Package operating profit increased $73$45 million, or 2.2%1.2%, primarily due to the increase in volume and revenue growth discussed previously, but was somewhat offset by increased aircraft impairment charges ($91 million in 2004 compared to $69 million in 2003) and a $63 million pension charge related to the consolidation of data systems used to collect and accumulate plan participant data.

2003 compared to 2002

U.S. domestic package revenue increased $1.098 billion, or 4.6%, for the year, which Domestic operating margin declined 70 basis points, and was driven by a 2.1% increase in average daily package volume and a 2.6% increase in revenue per piece. Ground volume increased by 1.5% in 2003, reversing a 2.0% decline in 2002, reflecting the improving U.S. economy and the impact that labor negotiations had on lowering volume during portions of 2002. The volume for our UPS Next Day Air products increased by 6.7% during the year, driven by double-digit growth in overnight letters which was influencedimpacted by the strength in mortgage refinancing activity during 2003. The increase in U.S. domestic average daily package volume was more significant inaircraft impairment and pension charges noted above, as well as the latter halfsale of the year. In the third and fourth quarters of 2003, total U.S. domestic average daily package volume increased 3.2% and 4.9%, respectively.

The overall improvement in revenue per piece was primarily due to the rate increase that became effective in January 2003, with some additional benefit from the fuel surcharge as described below. The decline in revenue per piece for the Next Day Air products, and the relatively smaller increase for the deferred products, was primarily due to the relatively higher growth in letter volume compared with the growth in package volume for these products.

On January 6, 2003, we increased rates for standard ground shipments an average of 3.9% for commercial deliveries. The ground residential surcharge increased $0.05 to $1.15 over the commercial ground rate. The additional delivery area surcharge added to residential deliveries in certain ZIP codes increased $0.25 to $1.75. Rates for UPS Hundredweight increased 5.9%. In addition, we increased rates for UPS Next Day Air an average of 3.4% and increased rates for deferred services by 4.5%.our Aviation Technologies business unit.

 

During 2003, the index-based fuel surcharge reset on a monthly basis and was based on the National U.S. Average On-Highway Diesel Fuel Prices as reported by the U.S. Department of Energy. Based on published rates, the average fuel surcharge increased to 1.47% in 2003 from 0.78% in 2002, resulting in an increase in fuel surcharge revenue of $144 million. Effective in 2004, we discontinued the fuel surcharge on ground service, while an indexed surcharge was applied to our Next Day Air and deferred products. This indexed fuel surcharge for the domestic air products was based on the U.S. Energy Department’s Gulf Coast spot price for a gallon of kerosene-type jet fuel.

U.S. domestic package operating profit declined $304 million, or 8.5%, primarily due to the slow volume and revenue growth combined with an increase in operating expenses (discussed further below under the section titled “Operating Expenses and Operating Margin”). U.S. domestic package operating profit increased 2.0% in the third quarter of 2003, we sold our Aviation Technologies business unit and decreased by 9.4%recognized a pre-tax gain of $24 million ($15 million after-tax, or $0.01 per diluted share), which is recorded in other operating expenses within the fourth quarter. InU.S. Domestic Package segment. The operating results of the fourth quarter of 2002, U.S. domestic package operating profit benefited from a $175 million credit due to a changeAviation Technologies unit were previously included in our vacation policy for non-union employees.U.S. Domestic Package segment, and were not material to our consolidated operating results in any of the periods presented.

 

International Package Operations

 

2005 compared to 2004

International Package revenue improved $1.168 billion, or 17.2%, for the year, primarily due to the 13.9% volume growth for our export products and revenue per piece improvements. The improvements in revenue per piece were impacted by rate changes, currency fluctuations, and the fuel surcharge applied to international shipments. Revenue increased $121 million during the year due to currency fluctuations, net of hedging activity, and also increased by $133 million during the year due to business acquisitions.

In January 2005, we increased rates 2.9% for international shipments originating in the United States, which includes our Worldwide Express, Worldwide Express Plus, UPS Worldwide Expedited and UPS International Standard services. Rate changes for international shipments originating outside the United States vary by geographical market and occur throughout the year.

In January 2005, we modified the fuel surcharge on U.S. export products by setting a maximum cap of 9.50%, which was increased to 12.50% effective in October 2005. The fuel surcharge for products originating outside the United States continues to be indexed to fuel prices in our different international regions, depending upon where the shipment takes place. Total international fuel surcharge revenue increased by $258 million during the year, due to higher jet fuel prices and increased international air volume.

21


Index to Financial Statements

Export volume increased throughout the world, with strong growth in Asia and Europe. Asian export volume, which increased 29% for the year, was driven by export growth from China. Asian export volume continues to benefit from our expanding international delivery network, including the additional flights from Shanghai, China that were added in the fourth quarter of 2004, and express air service between the U.S. and Guangzhou, China that began in the second quarter of 2005. European export volume increased 13% for the year, while export volume from the U.S. and Americas also showed solid increases. International domestic volume increased 12.4% for the year, due to volume growth in Canada and Europe, which also benefited from the acquisition of Messenger Service Stolica S.A. in Poland during the second quarter of 2005 and Lynx Express Ltd. in the United Kingdom in the third quarter of 2005. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, international domestic volume increased 3.7%.

Export revenue per piece increased 3.1% for the year (1.4% currency-adjusted), due to the rate increases discussed previously and the impact of the fuel surcharge, but was adversely affected by relatively higher growth in lower revenue per piece transborder product. In total, international average daily package volume increased 13.0% and average revenue per piece increased 4.0% (2.4% currency-adjusted).

The improvement in operating profit for our International Package operations was $345 million for the year, or 30.0%, with an increase in the operating margin of 180 basis points. This increase in operating profit and margin was positively impacted by the strong volume growth described previously, as well as better network utilization due to volume growth and geographic service expansion. The increase in operating profit was also favorably affected by $78 million due to the impact of currency fluctuations on revenue and expense (net of hedging activity), and by $45 million due to a change in our Management Incentive Awards program (discussed below in “Operating Expenses”). Operating profit was negatively affected in 2005 by $23 million in currency repatriation losses, as compared with repatriation gains of $32 million in 2004.

2004 compared to 2003

 

International packagePackage revenue improved $1.201$1.200 billion, or 21.6%21.4%, for the year primarily due to the 12.5% volume growth for our export products and strong revenue per piece improvements. Revenue increased $295 million during the year due to currency fluctuations. Revenue growth was also impacted by the change to our fuel surcharge (discussed below) as well as rate changes, which vary by geographical market and occur throughout

22


the year. Rates for international shipments originating in the United States (Worldwide Express, Worldwide Express Plus, UPS Worldwide Expedited and UPS International Standard service) increased an average of 3.5%.

 

In January 2004, changes were made to the calculation of our fuel surcharge on international products (including U.S. export products). The surcharge is nowbegan to be indexed to fuel prices in our different international regions, depending on where the shipment takes place. The current surcharge isbegan to be applied only applied to our international express products, while the previous surcharge was applied to all international products. These changes, along with higher fuel prices, had the effect of increasing international packageInternational Package revenue by $231 million during the year.

 

We experienced double-digit export volume growth in each region throughout the world, with the Asia-Pacific region leading with 24% export volume growth, including a 101% increase in China export volume. Export volume continuescontinued to benefit from our expanding international network, such as the six additional flights to Shanghai, China that were added in the fourth quarter.quarter of 2004. European export volume grew in excess of 10%, and was positively influenced by the addition of 10 countries to the European Union.Union during the year. Non-U.S. domestic volume increased 3.7% for the year, and primarily reflectsreflected improvements in our European and Canadian domestic delivery businesses.

 

Export revenue per piece increased 9.0%8.7% for the year (3.1%(2.9% currency-adjusted), benefiting from rate increases and the impact of the fuel surcharge. In total, international average daily package volume increased 7.0% and average revenue per piece increased 13.6% (6.7%13.4% (6.5% currency-adjusted).

 

22


Index to Financial Statements

The improvement in operating profit for our international packageInternational Package operations was $412$417 million, or 58.1%57.0%, for the year, $54 million of which was due to favorable currency fluctuations. ThisThe remaining increase in operating profit was primarily due to the strongsolid export volume growth and revenue per piece increases described previously, and a strong 380 basis point increase in operating margin throughprimarily due to better network utilization. International operating profit was adversely affected by aircraft impairment charges of $19 million in 2004, compared to a $6 million charge in 2003.

 

2003Supply Chain & Freight Operations

2005 compared to 20022004

 

International packageSupply Chain & Freight revenue improved $881 million,increased $3.181 billion, or 18.8%113.1%, for the year. Forwarding services and logistics revenue increased by $2.358 billion during the year, largely due primarily to the 8.6% volumeacquisition of Menlo Worldwide Forwarding in December 2004. The growth forin our export productsexisting forwarding services and strong revenue per piece improvements, a portion of which can be attributed to the impact of currency.logistics businesses (excluding Menlo Worldwide Forwarding) was driven by solid growth in our ocean and ground forwarding operations. Revenue increased $443by $17 million during the year due to favorable currency fluctuations. Export volume increasedOverall growth continues to benefit from the expansion of our freight forwarding network throughout the world, with Asia-Pacific, Canada,as well as the increase in global trade and the Americas showing double-digit export volume growth,increased outsourcing of manufacturing and U.S. and European export volume increasing slightly over 6%. European export volume growth was adversely impacted by the strength of the Euro and the weak European economy. Domestic volume increased 0.9% for the year, reversing a 3.2% decline from the previous year, which was also negatively affected by the weak European economy.distribution.

 

ExportDuring the third quarter of 2005, we completed our acquisition of Overnite Corp., now known as UPS Freight, which offers a variety of less-than-truckload (LTL) and truckload services to customers in North America. Overnite’s results have been included in the Supply Chain & Freight reporting segment since the August 5, 2005 acquisition date. Overnite generally reported improvements in its operating performance measures in the post-acquisition period versus the same period a year ago when it was not a part of UPS, including improvements in average daily LTL shipments and average LTL revenue per piece increased 12.5% for the year (3.3% currency-adjusted), due to improvements in product mix and continued focus on yield management. In total, international average daily package volume increased 3.7% and average revenue per piece increased 17.4% (6.2% currency-adjusted). The 7.6% decline in cargo revenue during the year was largely due to a reduction of flights in our air network in the Americas.

Rates for international shipments originating in the United States (UPS Worldwide Express, UPS Worldwide Express Plus, UPS Worldwide Expedited and UPS Standard service) increased an average of 3.9%. Rate changes for shipments originating outside the United States generally are made throughout the year and vary by geographic market.LTL hundredweight.

 

The improvement in operating profit forother businesses within Supply Chain & Freight, which include our international package operations was $387 million forretail franchising business, our mail and consulting services, and our financial business, increased revenue by 6.0% during the year, $117 million of which was due to favorable currency fluctuations.year. This increase in operating profitrevenue growth was primarily due to increased revenue at our mail and financial services units.

Operating profit for the strong export volume growthSupply Chain & Freight segment increased by $18 million, or 13.0%, for the year, largely due to the operating profits generated by Overnite. Operating profit and revenue per piece increases described previously. In 2002, internationalmargin were negatively affected by operating losses incurred in the acquired Menlo Worldwide Forwarding operations, as well as costs incurred in integrating this business into our existing forwarding services business. Currency fluctuations positively affected operating profit benefited from an $11by $4 million creditduring the year. Operating profit also was favorably impacted by $15 million due to operating expense as a result of a change in our vacation policy for non-union employees.

23


Non-Package OperationsManagement Incentive Awards program (discussed below in “Operating Expenses”).

 

2004 compared to 2003

 

Non-packageSupply Chain & Freight revenue increased $308$299 million, or 10.6%11.9%, for the year. UPS Supply Chain SolutionsFreight services and logistics revenue increased revenue by 10.3%11.9% during the year, with strong growth in our air and ground freight forwarding businesses, as well as our logistics business. The acquisition of Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, which was completed in December 2004, increased freight services and logistics revenue by $33 million. Favorable currency fluctuations provided $73 million of the increase in revenue for the year. The remainder of our non-package operations,other businesses within Supply Chain & Freight, which includes Mail Boxes Etc. (the franchisor of Mail Boxes Etc. and The UPS Store), UPS Capital,our retail franchising business, our mail and consulting services, and our excess value package insurancefinancial business, increased revenue by 11.3%11.9% for the year, largely due to strong double-digit franchise and royalty revenue growth at Mail Boxes Etc.our retail franchising business resulting from an expanding store base, as well as higher excess value insurance revenue. Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, which was acquired in December 2004, added $33 million in revenue.base.

 

Non-packageSupply Chain & Freight operating profit increased $59$82 million, or 12.7%146.4%, and operating margin increased by 270 basis points for the year, primarily due to improved results from our UPS Capital,financial business (largely due to a lower loan loss provision), and our mail services and excess value insurance business.business, which was affected in 2003 by the sale of our Mail Boxes Etc.Technologies business unit as described in the next paragraph. Our retail franchising business also experienced strong profit growth, due to the increased franchise and royalty revenue noted previously. Non-package operating profit includes $112 million (compared to $114 million in 2003) of intersegment profit for the year, with a corresponding amount of operating expense, which reduces operating profit, in the U.S. domestic package segment.These increases were partially offset by somewhat lower profits at our freight services and logistics operations.

 

23


Index to Financial Statements

During the second quarter of 2003, we sold our Mail Technologies business unit in a transaction that increased net income by $14 million, or $0.01 per diluted share. The gain consisted of a pre-tax loss of $24 million recorded in other operating expenses within the non-packageSupply Chain & Freight segment, and a tax benefit of $38 million recognized in conjunction with the sale. The tax benefit exceeded the pre-tax loss from this sale primarily because the goodwill impairment charge we previously recorded for the Mail Technologies business unit was not deductible for income tax purposes. Consequently, our tax basis was greater than our book basis, thus producing the tax benefit described above.

During the third quarter of 2003, we sold our Aviation Technologies business unit and recognized a pre-tax gain of $24 million ($15 million after-tax, or $0.01 per diluted share), which is recorded in other operating expenses within the non-package segment. The operating results of both the Mail Technologies unit and the Aviation Technologies unit were previously included in our non-packageSupply Chain & Freight segment, and were not material to our consolidated operating results in any of the periods presented.

 

2003Operating Expenses

2005 compared to 20022004

 

Non-package revenueConsolidated operating expenses increased $234 million,by $4.845 billion, or 8.8%15.3%, for the year. UPS Supply Chain Solutions,year, and were significantly impacted by the acquisitions of Menlo Worldwide Forwarding and Overnite. Operating expenses also increased revenue by 8.0% during the year. This increase was due to growth in our supply chain management and other logistics businesses, with international revenues growing faster than in the United States, partially as a result of favorable currency fluctuations. Favorable currency fluctuations accounted for $74$56 million of the increase in revenue. Freight forwarding revenue increased at a slower rate, which was influenced by global economic conditions and increased air revenue in 2002 as a result of the work disruption at U.S. west coast ports. The remainder of our non-package operations, which includes Mail Boxes Etc. (the franchisor of Mail Boxes Etc. and The UPS Store), UPS Capital, our mail and consulting services, and our excess value package insurance business, increased revenue by 11.0% for the year primarily due to the impact on revenue and expense of currency fluctuations (net of hedging activity) in our International Package and Supply Chain & Freight segments, and increased franchise revenue at Mail Boxes Etc. and improvements from$55 million for the year due to currency repatriation losses in our Mail Innovations unit.International Package segment.

 

Non-package operating profitCompensation and benefits increased $266 million,by $1.694 billion, or 134.3%8.1%, for the year.year, largely due to the acquisitions of Menlo Worldwide Forwarding and Overnite, as well as increased health and welfare benefit costs and higher pension expense for our union benefit plans. Stock-based and other management incentive compensation expense decreased $297 million, or 33.4%, in the year, due to a change in our Management Incentive Awards program implemented in 2005, described in the next paragraph, which was partially offset by the impact of prospectively adopting the measurement provisions of FAS 123 beginning with 2003 stock-based compensation awards.

During the first quarter of 2005, we modified our Management Incentive Awards program under our Incentive Compensation Plan to provide that half of the annual award be made in restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The RSUs granted in November 2005 under this program have a five-year graded vesting period, with approximately 20% of the total RSU award vesting at each anniversary date of the grant. The other half of the award granted in November 2005 was in the form of cash and unrestricted shares of Class A common stock and was fully vested at the time of grant. Previous awards under the Management Incentive Awards program were made in common stock that was fully vested in the year of grant. This change had the effect of lowering 2005 expense. As a result, 2005 expense for our Management Incentive Awards program (reported in operating expenses under “compensation and benefits”), including the RSUs, decreased $334 million ($213 million after-tax, or $0.19 per diluted share) compared with 2004.

Other operating expenses increased by $3.151 billion, or 29.3%, for the year, largely due to the Menlo Worldwide Forwarding and Overnite acquisitions, as well as increases in fuel expense and purchased transportation. The 47.2% increase in fuel expense for the year was impacted by higher prices for jet-A, diesel and unleaded gasoline, as well as higher fuel usage, but was partially mitigated with hedging gains. The 96.7% increase in purchased transportation was primarily due to the Menlo Worldwide Forwarding acquisition, but was also influenced by volume growth in our International Package business and higher operating profit fromfuel prices. The 9.2% increase in repairs and maintenance was largely due to higher expense on vehicle parts (partially affected by the Overnite acquisition), airframe and aircraft engine maintenance. The 6.5% increase in depreciation and amortization for the year was impacted by higher depreciation expense on buildings (largely due to acquisitions), aircraft, and capitalized software. The 16.0% increase in other occupancy expense was largely due to higher facilities rent expense in our Supply Chain Solutions unit,& Freight segment, which was drivenimpacted by the Menlo Worldwide Forwarding acquisition, and increased utilities expense. The 4.5% increase in revenue as well as the cost savings produced by our integration and restructuring program. Non-package operating profit in 2002other expenses was reduced by the $106 million restructuring charge and related expenses, and was increased by $11 millionprimarily due to the changeOvernite acquisition, but partially offset by the absence in our vacation policy for non-union employees. Non-package operating profit includes $1142005 of the $110 million (compared to $112 millionaircraft impairment charge that we incurred in 2002) of intersegment profit, with a corresponding amount of operating expense, which reduces operating profit, in the U.S. domestic package segment.2004.

 

24


Operating Expenses and Operating Margin

Index to Financial Statements

2004 compared to 2003

 

Consolidated operating expenses increased by $2.553 billion, or 8.8%, for the year, $311 million of which was due to currency fluctuations in our international packageInternational Package and non-packageSupply Chain & Freight segments. Compensation and benefits increased by $1.588$1.572 billion, or 8.2%, for the year, largely due to increased payroll costs, increased health and welfare expense, and higher pension expense for our union pension plans. Stock-based compensation expense increased $167 million, or 23.2%, during the year, primarily as a result of increased management incentive awardsManagement Incentive Awards expense and adopting the measurement provisions of FAS 123 prospectively beginning with 2003 stock-based compensation awards.

 

Other operating expenses increased by $965$981 million, or 9.9%10.0%, for the year, largely due to a 34.9% increase in fuel expense and a 12.6% increase in purchased transportation, but were somewhat offset by a decline in depreciation and amortization expense. The increase in fuel expense was primarily due to higher prices for Jet-A, diesel, and unleaded gasoline, in addition to somewhat higher fuel usage and lower hedging gains. The increase in purchased transportation expense was influenced by the impact of currency, higher fuel prices, and volume growth in our international package business. The decline in depreciation and amortization for the year was impacted by lower depreciation expense on aircraft engines, largely due to the retirement of some older aircraft. The increase in repairs and maintenance expense was affected by increased expense on vehicle parts and airframe and engine maintenance. The increase in other occupancy expense was largely related to higher rent expense, but somewhat offset by lower real estate taxes. The increase in other expenses was affected by the $110 million impairment of aircraft, engines, and parts, as well as the $63 million pension charge discussed previously, in addition to higher advertising costs.

 

Our consolidated operating margin, defined as operating profit as a percentage of revenue, increased in 2004 compared with 2003. The operating margins for our three business segments were as follows:

   Year Ended December 31,

 
   2004

  2003

  2002

 

Operating Segment

          

U.S. domestic package

  12.6% 13.1% 14.9%

International package

  16.6% 12.7% 6.9%

Non-package

  16.3% 16.0% 7.4%

Consolidated

  13.6% 13.3% 13.1%

2003 compared to 2002

Consolidated operating expenses increased by $1.864 billion, or 6.9%, for the year, $398 million of which was due to currency fluctuations in our international package and non-package segments. Compensation and benefits increased by $1.388 billion, or 7.7%, for the year, primarily due to increased health and welfare benefit costs and higher pension expense. Stock-based compensation expense totaled $724 million in 2003, a 14.0% increase over 2002, primarily as a result of increased Management Incentive Awards expense and adopting the measurement provisions of FAS 123 for 2003 stock-based compensation awards.

Other operating expenses increased by $476 million, or 5.2%, for the year, largely due to a 12.3% increase in occupancy costs, a 10.3% increase in fuel expense, and smaller increases in purchased transportation, repairs and maintenance, and depreciation and amortization. Other operating expenses in 2002 were affected by the $106 million restructuring charge and related expenses incurred in the integration of our Freight Services and Logistics Group operations into our UPS Supply Chain Solutions unit. The growth in other occupancy expense was impacted by higher rent expense on buildings and facilities, higher real estate taxes, and weather-related increases in natural gas and utilities expense. The fuel expense increase was due to higher fuel prices in 2003, somewhat offset by hedging gains and lower fuel usage. The increase in purchased transportation expense was

25


influenced by the impact of currency and growth in our international package and Supply Chain Solutions businesses. The growth in depreciation and amortization reflects the addition of new aircraft, the completion of facilities projects (including UPS Worldport), and increased amortization of capitalized software. The increase in repairs and maintenance was primarily due to higher vehicle, aircraft, and equipment maintenance expense.

The increase in other expenses was primarily due to a $75 million impairment charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2003, resulting from an impairment evaluation performed when we permanently removed a number of Boeing 727 and DC-8 aircraft from service.

Investment Income/Income and Interest Expense

 

20042005 compared to 20032004

 

InvestmentThe increase in investment income increased by $64of $22 million during the year was primarily due to higher average yields earned caused by the increasing short-term interest rates in the United States, but partially offset by a $58 millionlower average balance of interest-earning investments, increased equity-method losses on certain investment partnerships, and an investment impairment charge recognized during 2003.on certain available-for-sale securities. We periodically review our investments for indications of other than temporary impairment considering many factors, including the extent and duration to which a security’s fair value has been less than its cost, overall economic and market conditions, and the financial condition and specific prospects for the issuer. After considering these factors, we recorded an impairment charge of $16 million in the fourth quarter of 2005 related to several variable rate preferred securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC).

The $23 million increase in interest expense for the year was primarily due to higher floating interest rates on variable rate debt and interest rate swaps, as well as higher imputed interest expense associated with certain investment partnerships.

2004 compared to 2003

Investment income increased by $64 million during the year, primarily due to a $58 million impairment charge recognized during 2003. During the first quarter of 2003, after considering the continued decline in the U.S. equity markets, we recognized an impairment charge of $58 million, primarily related to our investment in S&P 500 equity portfolios. Investment income also increased in 2004 due to higher interest rates earned on cash balances, but was somewhat offset by increased equity-method losses on certain investment partnerships.

 

The $28 million increase in interest expense during 2004 was primarily due to the impact of higher interest rates on variable rate debt and certain interest rate swaps, as well as the impact of currency exchange rates and imputed interest expense associated with certain investment partnerships. The impact of higher interest rates was somewhat offset by lower average debt balances outstanding in 2004 compared to 2003.

 

25


Index to Financial Statements

In December 2003, we redeemed $300 million in cash-settled convertible senior notes at a price of 102.703, and also terminated the swap transaction associated with the notes. The redemption amount paid was lower than the amount recorded for the fair value of the notes at the time of redemption, which, along with the cash settlement received on the swap, resulted in a $28 million non-operating gain recorded in 2003 results.

 

2003 compared to 2002

The decrease in investment income of $45 million in 2003 is primarily due to the $58 million impairment charge recognized during the first quarter of 2003. The $52 million decline in interest expense in 2003 was primarily the result of lower commercial paper balances outstanding, lower interest rates on variable rate debt, and lower floating rates on interest rate swaps.

Net Income and Earnings Per Share

 

20042005 compared to 20032004

 

2004 netNet income for 2005 was $3.333$3.870 billion, a 15.0%16.1% increase from the $2.898$3.333 billion achieved in 2003,2004, resulting in an 18.4% increase in diluted earnings per share to $3.47 in 2005 from $2.93 in 2004. The increase in net income for 2005 was largely due to higher operating profit for both our U.S. Domestic and International Package segments. Net income was adversely impacted by an increase in our effective tax rate to 36.3% in 2005 from 32.3% in 2004. The lower tax rate in 2004 from $2.55 in 2003. was impacted by credits to income tax expense totaling $142 million ($0.13 per diluted share) related to various items, including the resolution of certain tax matters, the removal of a portion of the valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets on net operating loss carryforwards, and an adjustment for identified tax contingency items.

Net income in 2004 was adversely impacted by a $70 million after-tax impairment charge ($0.06 per diluted share) on Boeing 727, 747, and McDonnell Douglas DC-8 aircraft, engines, and parts, as well as a $40 million after-tax charge ($0.04 per diluted share) to pension expense resulting from the consolidation of data systems used to collect and accumulate plan participant data.

2004 compared to 2003

2004 net income was $3.333 billion, a 15.0% increase from the $2.898 billion in 2003, resulting in an increase in diluted earnings per share to $2.93 in 2004 from $2.55 in 2003. Net income in 2004 was positively impacted by credits to incomethe aircraft impairment, pension charge, and tax expense totaling $142 million ($0.13 per diluted share) related to various items including the resolution of certain tax matters, the removal of a portion of the valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets on net operating loss carryforwards, and an adjustment for identified tax contingency items.discussed previously.

 

26


Net income in 2003 was favorably impacted by the $14 million after-tax gain ($0.01 per diluted share) on the sale of Mail Technologies, the $15 million after-tax gain ($0.01 per diluted share) on the sale of Aviation Technologies, and the $18 million after-tax gain ($0.02 per diluted share) recognized upon redemption of our $300 million cash-settled senior convertible notes. Net income in 2003 was adversely impacted by the $37 million after-tax investment impairment charge ($0.03 per diluted share) described previously. Net income in 2003 was also favorably impacted by reductions in income tax expense of $116 million ($0.10 per diluted share) due to the resolution of various tax issues with the IRS, a favorable court ruling on the tax treatment of jet engine maintenance costs, and a lower effective state tax rate.

 

2003 compared to 2002

Net income for 2003 was $2.898 billion, a decrease of $284 million from the $3.182 billion achieved in 2002, resulting in a decrease in diluted earnings per share to $2.55 in 2003 from $2.81 in 2002. Net income in 2003 was affected by the items noted above. Net income in 2002 was favorably impacted by a $776 million after-tax ($0.68 per diluted share) benefit resulting from the reversal of a portion of the previously established tax assessment liability, and by $121 million after-tax ($0.11 per diluted share) from the credit to expense as a result of the change in our vacation policy for non-union employees. Net income in 2002 was adversely impacted by $65 million after-tax ($0.06 per diluted share) due to the restructuring charge and related expenses and by $72 million after-tax ($0.06 per diluted share) due to the FAS 142 cumulative expense adjustment.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Net Cash From Operating Activities

 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $5.793, $5.331, $4.576, and $5.688$4.576 billion in 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002,2003, respectively. The increase in 20042005 operating cash flows compared with 20032004 was primarily due to higher net income, decreasedbut partially offset by higher pension and retirement plan fundings, and cash received upon the resolution of various tax matters.fundings. In 2004,2005, we funded $450$995 million to our pension and postretirement benefit plans as compared to $1.136 billion$585 million in 2003.2004. As discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, projected pension and postretirement health contributions to plan trusts in 20052006 are projected to be approximately $723$828 million. In 2004,2005, we received $610a $374 million from our previously disclosedtax refund associated with the 1985-1990 settlement with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)(“IRS”) reached previously, primarily on tax matters related to excess value package insuranceinsurance. In 2004, we received $610 million from a tax settlement with the IRS for tax years 1983-84 and 1991-98 (see “Contingencies” section below). As of December 31, 2004, we had a $371 million receivable recorded for the settlement related to tax years 1985-90.1991-98.

 

On October 28, 2004,November 18, 2005, we announced a rate increase and a change in the fuel surcharge that will taketook effect on January 3, 2005.2, 2006. We increased rates 2.9%5.5% on UPS Next Day Air, UPS 2nd Day Air, and UPS 3 Day Select, and

26


Index to Financial Statements

3.9% on UPS Ground. We also increased rates 2.9%5.5% for international shipments originating in the United States (Worldwide Express, Worldwide Express Plus, UPS Worldwide Expedited and UPS International Standard service). Other pricing changes include a new charge for undeliverable packages after three delivery attempts and an increase in rates for proof of $0.25delivery features for delivery area surcharge on both residentialour Delivery Required and commercial services to certain ZIP codes.Signature Confirmation services. The residential surcharge will increase $0.10increased $0.25 for UPS Ground services and $0.35 for UPS Next Day Air, UPS 2nd Day Air and UPS 3 Day Select. These rate changes are customary, and are consistent with previous years’ rate increases. Additionally, in January 20052006 we will modifymodified the fuel surcharge on domestic and international air services by settingreducing by 2% the index used to determine the fuel surcharge. The air fuel surcharge continues to remain subject to a maximum cap of 9.5%12.5%. AThe UPS Ground fuel surcharge of 2% will be appliedcontinues to UPS Ground services that will fluctuate after January 2005 based on the U.S. Energy Department’s On-Highway Diesel Fuel Price. Rate changes for shipments originating outside the U.S. were made throughout the past year and varied by geographic market.

 

Net Cash Used In Investing Activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities was $975 million, $3.638 $2.742,billion, and $3.281$2.742 billion in 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002,2003, respectively. The primary reason for the increased cash useddecrease in investing activities has been the increasing net purchases of marketable securities, due to the excess of cash generated over our capital investment needs. The increase in funds used for business acquisitions is2005 compared with 2004 was primarily due to the net sales of marketable securities and short-term investments to fund business acquisitions and the aforementioned benefit plan contributions. In 2005, we spent $1.488 billion on business acquisitions, primarily Overnite Corp., Lynx Express Ltd. in the United Kingdom, Messenger Service Stolica S.A. in Poland, and the express operations of Sinotrans Air Transportation Development Co. Ltd. in China. In 2004, we spent $238 million on business acquisitions, primarily Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, Inc. and UPS

27


the 49% minority interest in Yamato Express Co. in Japan (See Note 7). We expect to make additional payments related to business acquisitions in 2004 (see Note 7of approximately $50 million during 2006, primarily related to the consolidated financial statements). TheSinotrans transaction. We generated cash generated fromof $95 and $318 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively, due to the sales and customer paydowns of finance receivables, was primarily due to principal payments on finance receivables and sales of portions of our portfolio, primarily in theour leasing, asset-based lending, and receivable factoring business.businesses.

 

Capital expenditures represent a primary use of cash in investing activities, as follows (in millions):

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

  2005

  2004

  2003

Buildings and facilities

  $547  $451  $528  $495  $547  $451

Aircraft and parts

   829   1,019   638   874   829   1,019

Vehicles

   393   161   41   456   393   161

Information technology

   358   316   451   362   358   316
  

  

  

  

  

  

  $2,127  $1,947  $1,658  $2,187  $2,127  $1,947
  

  

  

  

  

  

 

As described in the “Commitments” section below, we have commitments for the purchase of aircraft, vehicles, equipment and other fixed assets to provide for the replacement of existing capacity and anticipated future growth. We fund our capital expenditures with our cash from operations.

 

Net Cash Used In Financing Activities

 

Net cash used in financing activities was $4.175, $2.014, $2.110 and $2.090$2.110 billion in 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002,2003, respectively. Our primary useuses of cash in financing activities hashave been to repurchase stock, pay dividends, and repay long-term debt. In October 2004, a totalAugust 2005, the Board of Directors authorized an additional $2.0 billion was authorized for share repurchases as part of our continuing share repurchase program. As of December 31, 2004, $1.817 billion of this authorization was available for future share repurchases.repurchases, in addition to the amount remaining under our October 2004 share repurchase authorization. We repurchased a total of 33.9 million shares of Class A and Class B common stock for $2.479 billion in 2005, and 18.1 million shares for $1.310 billion of common stock in 2004. As of December 31, 2005, we had $1.338 billion of our share repurchase authorization remaining.

 

We increased our quarterly cash dividendsdividend payment to $0.33 per share to $1.12in 2005 from $0.28 per share in 2004, from $0.92 in 2003, resulting in an increase in total cash dividends paid to $1.208$1.391 billion from $956 million.$1.208 billion. The declaration of

27


Index to Financial Statements

dividends is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on various factors, including our net income, financial condition, cash requirements, future prospects, and other relevant factors. We expect to continue the practice of paying regular cash dividends. In February 2005, the Board of Directors declared a $0.33 per share dividend, which represents a 17.9% increase over the $0.28 previous quarterly dividend. The dividend is payable on March 9, 2005 to shareowners of record on February 22, 2005.

 

During 2004,2005, we repaid $468$589 million in debt, primarily consisting of $264 million inpaydowns of commercial paper, $56 million in redemptions of UPS Notes, $57 million in scheduled principal payments on capital lease obligations, and $60 million forrepayments of debt that was previously assumed with the redemptionacquisitions of our Singapore Dollar notes issue.Lynx Express Ltd. and Overnite Corp. Issuances of debt primarily consisted of $735were $128 million in commercial paper2005, and $41 millionconsisted primarily of loans related to our investment in UPS Notes.certain equity-method real estate partnerships. We consider the overall fixed and floating interest rate mix of our portfolio and the related overall cost of borrowing when planning for future issuances and non-scheduled repayments of debt.

 

Sources of Credit

 

We maintain two commercial paper programs under which we are authorized to borrow up to $7.0 billion. Approximately $1.015 billion wasin the United States. We had $739 million outstanding under these programs as of December 31, 2004,2005, with an average interest rate of 2.10%4.01%. The entire balance outstanding has been classified as a current liability in our balance sheet. In addition, weWe also maintain an extendablea European commercial notespaper program under which we are authorized to borrow up to $500 million. No€1.0 billion in a variety of currencies. There were no amounts were outstanding under this program atas of December 31, 2004.2005.

 

We maintain two credit agreements with a consortium of banks. These agreements provide revolving credit facilities of $1.0 billion each, with one expiring on April 21, 200520, 2006 and the other on April 24, 2008.21, 2010. Interest on any amounts we borrow under these facilities would be charged at 90-day LIBOR plus 15 basis points. There were no borrowings under either of these agreements as of December 31, 2004.2005.

 

28


In August 2003, we filed a $2.0 billion shelf registration statement under which we may issue debt securities in the United States. There was approximately $126 million issued under this shelf registration statement at December 31, 2004,2005, all of which consists of issuances under our UPS Notes program.

 

Our existing debt instruments and credit facilities do not have cross-default or ratings triggers, however these debt instruments and credit facilities do subject us to certain financial covenants. These covenants generally require us to maintain a $3.0 billion minimum net worth and limit the amount of secured indebtedness available to the company. These covenants are not considered material to the overall financial condition of the company, and all covenant tests were passedsatisfied as of December 31, 2004.2005.

 

Commitments

 

We have contractual obligations and commitments in the form of operating leases, capital leases, debt obligations, purchase commitments, and purchase commitments.certain other liabilities. We intend to satisfy these obligations through the use of cash flow from operations. The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 20042005 (in millions):

 

Year


  

Capitalized

Leases


  

Operating

Leases


  

Debt

Principal


  

Purchase

Commitments


  

Capitalized

Leases


  

Operating

Leases


  

Debt

Principal


  

Purchase

Commitments


  Other
Liabilities


2005

  $97  $370  $1,110  $1,012

2006

   70   327   6   488  $64  $403  $774  $1,280  $48

2007

   121   242   —     223   107   348   70   826   68

2008

   132   169   27   274   115   248   37   738   69

2009

   76   128   84   637   66   176   104   652   65

After 2009

   62   590   2,777   1,129

2010

   61   126   30   478   62

After 2010

   1   544   2,637   689   285
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total

   558  $1,826  $4,004  $3,763  $414  $1,845  $3,652  $4,663  $597
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

In December 2004,28


Index to Financial Statements

During 2005, we amended our existingtook delivery of six Boeing MD-11 aircraft purchase agreement withand seven Airbus Industries.A300-600 aircraft. The amended agreement will reducefinal six firm Airbus A300-600 aircraft on order from 50 to 13, and the number of options on this aircraft from 37 to zero. These 13 aircraft remaining on order will be delivered to UPSare scheduled for delivery by July 2006. Additionally,We have firm commitments to purchase 13 Boeing MD-11 aircraft, and we placedexpect to take delivery of these aircraft during 2006 and 2007. In 2005, we made firm commitments to purchase eight Boeing 747-400F aircraft scheduled for delivery during 2007 and 2008, and two Boeing 747-400SF aircraft scheduled for delivery during 2008. In addition, we have a firm order forcommitment to purchase 10 Airbus A380 freighter aircraft and obtained options to purchase 10 additional A380 aircraft. The Airbus A380 aircraft will be delivered to UPSdeliveries are scheduled between 2009 and 2012. TheThese aircraft purchase commitments information above reflectsorders will provide for the amended agreement.replacement of existing capacity and anticipated future growth.

 

In JanuaryAs of December 31, 2005, we also announced an agreement to purchase an additional 11 Boeing MD-11 pre-owned aircraft. These aircraft will be delivered to UPS betweenhad outstanding letters of credit totaling approximately $2.095 billion issued in connection with routine business requirements. As of December 31, 2005, and 2007.we had unfunded loan commitments totaling $416 million associated with our financial business.

 

We believe that funds from operations and borrowing programs will provide adequate sources of liquidity and capital resources to meet our expected long-term needs for the operation of our business, including anticipated capital expenditures, such as commitments for aircraft purchases, for the foreseeable future.

 

Contingencies

 

On August 9, 1999, the United States Tax Court held that we were liable for tax on income of Overseas Partners Ltd., a Bermuda company that had reinsured excess value (“EV”) insurance purchased by our customers beginning in 1984, and that we were liable for additional tax for the 1983 and 1984 tax years. The IRS took similar positions to those advanced in the Tax Court decision for tax years subsequent to 1984 through 1998. On June 20, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled in our favor and reversed the Tax Court decision. In January 2003, we and the IRS finalized settlement of all outstanding tax issues related to EV package insurance. Under the terms of settlement, we agreed to adjustments that will result in income tax due of approximately $562 million, additions to tax of $60 million and related interest. The amount due to the IRS as a result of the settlement is less than amounts we previously had accrued. As a result, we recorded income, before taxes, of $1.023 billion ($776 million after tax) during the fourth quarter of 2002. In the first quarter of 2004, we received a refund of $185 million pertaining to the 1983 and 1984 tax years.

29


The IRS had proposed adjustments, unrelated to the EV package insurance matters discussed above, regarding the allowance of deductions and certain losses, the characterization of expenses as capital rather than ordinary, the treatment of certain income, and our entitlement to tax credits in the 1985 through 1998 tax years. In the third quarter of 2004, we settled all outstanding issues related to each of the tax years 1991 through 1998. In the fourth quarter of 2004, we received a refund of $425 million pertaining to the 1991 through 1998 tax years. We expect to receive the $371 million of refunds related to the 1985 through 1990 tax years within the next six months.

The IRS may take similar positions with respect to some of the non-EV package insurance matters for each of the years 1999 through 2004. If challenged, we expect that we will prevail on substantially all of these issues. Specifically, we believe that our practice of expensing the items that the IRS alleges should have been capitalized is consistent with the practices of other industry participants. We believe that the eventual resolution of these issues will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

We were named as a defendant in twenty-three now-dismissed lawsuits that sought to hold us liable for the collection of premiums for EV insurance in connection with package shipments since 1984. Based on state and federal tort, contract and statutory claims, these cases generally claimed that we failed to remit collected EV premiums to an independent insurer; we failed to provide promised EV insurance; we acted as an insurer without complying with state insurance laws and regulations; and the price for EV insurance was excessive. These actions were all filed after the August 9, 1999 U.S. Tax Court decision, discussed above, which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit later reversed.

These twenty-three cases were consolidated for pre-trial purposes in a multi-district litigation proceeding (“MDL Proceeding”) in federal court in New York. In addition to the cases in which UPS was named as a defendant, there also was an action, Smith v. Mail Boxes Etc., against Mail Boxes Etc. and its franchisees relating to UPS EV insurance and related services purchased through Mail Boxes Etc. centers. That case also was consolidated into the MDL Proceeding.

In late 2003, the parties reached a global settlement resolving all claims and all cases in the MDL proceeding. In reaching the settlement, we and the other defendants expressly denied any and all liability. On July 30, 2004, the court issued an order granting final approval to the substantive terms of the settlement. No appeals were filed and the settlement became effective on September 8, 2004.

Pursuant to the settlement, UPS has provided qualifying settlement class members with vouchers toward the purchase of specified UPS services and will pay the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees, the total amount of which still remains to be determined by the court. Other defendants have contributed to the costs of the settlement, including the attorneys’ fees. The ultimate cost to us of the proposed settlement will depend on a number of factors, including how many vouchers settlement class members actually use. We do not believe that this proposed settlement will have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

We are a defendant in a number of lawsuits filed in state and federal courts containing various class-action allegations under state wage-and-hour laws. In one of these cases, Marlo v. UPS, which has been certified as a class action in a California statefederal court, plaintiffs allege that they improperly were denied overtime, and seek penalties for missed meal and rest periods, and interest and attorneys’ fees. Plaintiffs purport to represent a class of 1,200 full-time supervisors.

 

We have denied any liability with respect to these claims and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in these cases. At this time, we have not determined the amount of any liability that may result from these matters or whether such liability, if any, would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

 

With the assistance of outside counsel, we have undertaken an internal investigation of certain conduct within our Supply Chain Solutions subsidiary in certain locations outside the United States. Our investigation has determined that certain conduct, which commenced prior to our subsidiary’s 2001 acquisition of a freight forwarding business that was part of Fritz Companies Inc., may have violated the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Our investigation also determined that a small number of former employees directed the conduct in question. The monetary value involved in this conduct appears to be immaterial. We have implemented numerous remediation steps, and our investigation continues. In addition,March 2006 we are a defendant in various other lawsuits that arose ininformed the normal courseSEC and the Department of business.Justice of our investigation, and we intend to cooperate fully with any review by the government of these issues. We do not believe that the eventual resolutionresults of these casesthis investigation, the remediation or related penalties, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations, or liquidity.nor do we believe that these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.

 

30


We participate in a number of trustee-managed multi-employer pension and health and welfare plans for employees covered under collective bargaining agreements. Several factors could result in potential funding deficiencies which could cause us to make significantly higher future contributions to these plans, including unfavorable investment performance, changes in demographics, and increased benefits to participants. At this time, we are unable to determine the amount of additional future contributions, if any, or whether any material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows couldliquidity would result from our participation in these plans.

 

Due to the events of September 11, 2001, increased security requirements for air carriers may be forthcoming; however, we do not anticipate that such measures will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. In addition, our insurance premiums have risen and we have taken several actions, including self-insuring certain risks, to mitigate the expense increase.

As of December 31, 2004,2005, we had approximately 229,000241,000 employees employed under a national master agreement and various supplemental agreements with local unions affiliated with the International Brotherhood

29


Index to Financial Statements

of Teamsters (“Teamsters”). These agreements run through July 31, 2008. The majority of our pilots are employed under a collective bargaining agreement with the Independent Pilots Association, which became amendable January 1, 2004.December 31, 2003. Negotiations are ongoing with the assistance of the National Mediation Board. Our airline mechanics are covered by a collective bargaining agreement with Teamsters Local 2727, which becomes amendable on November 1, 2006. In addition, the majority of our ground mechanics who are not employed under agreements with the Teamsters are employed under collective bargaining agreements with the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. These agreements run through July 31, 2009.

 

Market Risk

 

We are exposed to market risk from changes in certain commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and equity prices. All of these market risks arise in the normal course of business, as we do not engage in speculative trading activities. In order to manage the risk arising from these exposures, we utilize a variety of foreign exchange, interest rate, equity and commodity forward contracts, options, and swaps.

 

The following analysis provides quantitative information regarding our exposure to commodity price risk, foreign currency exchange risk, interest rate risk, and equity price risk. We utilize valuation models to evaluate the sensitivity of the fair value of financial instruments with exposure to market risk that assume instantaneous, parallel shifts in exchange rates, interest rate yield curves, and commodity and equity prices. For options and instruments with non-linear returns, models appropriate to the instrument are utilized to determine the impact of market shifts. There are certain limitations inherent in the sensitivity analyses presented, primarily due to the assumption that exchange rates change in a parallel fashion and that interest rates change instantaneously. In addition, the analyses are unable to reflect the complex market reactions that normally would arise from the market shifts modeled.

 

A discussion of our accounting policies for derivative instruments and further disclosures are provided in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

Commodity Price Risk

 

We are exposed to an increase in the prices of refined fuels, principally jet-A, diesel, and unleaded gasoline, which are used in the transportation of packages. Additionally, we are exposed to an increase in the prices of other energy products, primarily natural gas and electricity, used in our operating facilities throughout the world. We use a combination of options, swaps, and futures contracts to provide some protection from rising fuel and energy prices. These derivative instruments generally cover forecasted fuel and energy consumption for periods of one to three years. The net fair value of such contracts subject to price risk, excluding the underlying

31


exposures, as of December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 was an asset of $101$192 and $30$101 million, respectively. The potential loss in the fair value of these derivative contracts, assuming a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the underlying commodity price, would be approximately $32$35 and $17$32 million at December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. This amount excludes the offsetting impact of the price risk inherent in the physical purchase of the underlying commodities.

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

 

We have foreign currency risks related to our revenue, operating expenses, and financing transactions in currencies other than the local currencies in which we operate. We are exposed to currency risk from the potential changes in functional currency values of our foreign currency-denominated assets, liabilities, and cash flows. Our most significant foreign currency exposures relate to the Euro, the British Pound Sterling and the Canadian Dollar. We use a combination of purchased and written options and forward contracts to hedge cash flow currency exposures. These derivative instruments generally cover forecasted foreign currency exposures for periods up to one year. As of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, the net fair value of the hedging instruments

30


Index to Financial Statements

described above was a liabilityan asset (liability) of $(28)$52 and $(48)$(28) million, respectively. The potential loss in fair value for such instruments from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates would be approximately $117$65 and $97$117 million at December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. This sensitivity analysis assumes a parallel shift in the foreign currency exchange rates. Exchange rates rarely move in the same direction. The assumption that exchange rates change in a parallel fashion may overstate the impact of changing exchange rates on assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

As described in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, we have issued debt instruments, including debt associated with capital leases, that accrue expense at fixed and floating rates of interest. We use a combination of derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps, as part of our program to manage the fixed and floating interest rate mix of our total debt portfolio and related overall cost of borrowing. These swaps are generally entered into concurrently with the issuance of the debt that they are intended to modify, and the notional amount, interest payment, and maturity dates of the swaps match the terms of the associated debt.

 

Our floating rate debt and interest rate swaps subject us to risk resulting from changes in short-term (primarily LIBOR) interest rates. The potential change in annual interest expense resulting from a hypothetical 100 basis point change in short-term interest rates applied to our floating rate debt and swap instruments at both December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 would be approximately $29 and $25 million, respectively.million.

 

As described in Note 1 and Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, we have certain investments in debt, auction rate, and preferred securities that accrue income at variable rates of interest. The potential change in annual investment income resulting from a hypothetical 100 basis point change in interest rates applied to our investments exposed to variable interest rates at December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 would be approximately $45$14 and $31$45 million, respectively.

 

Additionally, as described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, we hold a portfolio of finance receivables that accrue income at fixed and floating rates of interest. The potential change in the annual income resulting from a hypothetical 100 basis point change in interest rates applied to our variable rate finance receivables at December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 would be immaterial.

 

This interest rate sensitivity analysis assumes interest rate changes are instantaneous, parallel shifts in the yield curve. In reality, interest rate changes are rarely instantaneous or parallel. While this is our best estimate of the impact of the specified interest rate scenarios, these estimates should not be viewed as forecasts. We adjust the fixed and floating interest rate mix of our interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities in response to changes in market conditions.

 

32


Equity Price Risk

 

We hold investments in various common equity securities that are subject to price risk, and for certain of these securities, we utilize options to hedge this price risk. At December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, the fair value of such investments was $77$89 and $95$77 million, respectively. The potential change in the fair value of such investments, assuming a 10% change in equity prices net of the offsetting impact of any hedges, would be approximately $8$9 and $10$8 million at December 31, 20042005 and 2003.2004.

 

Credit Risk

 

The forward contracts, swaps, and options previously discussed contain an element of risk that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the agreements. However, we minimize such risk exposures for these instruments by limiting the counterparties to large banks and financial institutions that meet established credit guidelines. We do not expect to incur any losses as a result of counterparty default.

 

31


Index to Financial Statements

New Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“FAS 123R”123(R)”), which replaces FAS 123 and supercedes APB 25. FAS 123R123(R) requires all share-based paymentsawards to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statementsmeasured based on their fair values and expensed over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (the vesting period). We had previously adopted the fair value recognition provisions of the original FAS 123, prospectively for all new stock compensation awards granted to employees subsequent to January 1, 2003. FAS 123(R) was effective beginning with the first interim or annual period after June 15, 2005, with early adoption encouraged. We will adopt2005; the SEC deferred the effective date, and as a result, we adopted FAS 123R in the third quarter of 2005, using the prospective method of adoption. The prospective method requires123(R) on January 1, 2006. On that compensation expense be recorded for alldate, there were no unvested stock options and restrictedor other forms of employee stock compensation issued prior to January 1, 2003.

We issue employee share-based awards, under our Incentive Compensation Plan, that are subject to specific vesting conditions; generally, the awards cliff vest or vest ratably over a five year period, “the nominal vesting period,” or at the beginningdate the employee retires (as defined by the plan), if earlier. For awards that specify an employee vests in the award upon retirement, we account for the awards using the nominal vesting period approach. Under this approach, we record compensation expense over the nominal vesting period. If the employee retires before the end of the first quarternominal vesting period, any remaining unrecognized compensation expense is recorded at the date of retirement.

Upon our adoption of FAS 123R. There123(R), we will revise our approach to apply the non-substantive vesting period approach to all new share-based compensation awards. Under this approach, compensation cost will be no impact upon adoption, as werecognized immediately for awards granted to retirement-eligible employees, or over the period from the grant date to the date retirement eligibility is achieved, if that is expected to occur during the nominal vesting period. We will already be expensing allcontinue to apply the nominal vesting period approach for any awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, and for the remaining portion of the then unvested option and restricted stockoutstanding awards.

 

In December 2004,If we had accounted for all share-based compensation awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 under the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 109-2, “Accountingnon-substantive vesting period approach, the impact to our net income and Disclosure Guidanceearnings per share would have been immaterial for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004” (“FSP 109-2”). FSP 109-2 provides guidance under FAS 109 with respect to recording the potential impactall prior periods. The adoption of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Jobs Act”)non-substantive vesting period approach is expected to reduce 2006 net income by an estimated $29 million, or $0.03 per diluted share, based on enterprises’ income tax expense and deferred tax liability. The Jobs Act was enacted on October 22, 2004. FSP 109-2 statesshare-based awards that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying FAS 109. We have not yet completed our evaluation of the impact of the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Act. Accordingly, as provided forwe are anticipating granting in FSP 109-2, we have not adjusted our income tax provision or deferred tax liabilities to reflect the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Act.2006.

 

The adoption of the following recent accounting pronouncements did not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition:

 

FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements47, “Accounting for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others—An Interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and Rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34”Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations”;

 

FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities—An Interpretation of ARB No. 51”EITF 05-6, “Determining the Amortization Period for Leasehold Improvements”; and

 

FASB Statement No. 132(R) (revised 2003), “Employer’s Disclosures about Pensions and Other Post-Retirement Benefits—An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106”;

FASB Statement No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”;

FASB Statement No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”;

33


FASB Statement No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity”; and

FSP 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003”.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As indicated in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements, the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses reported in our financial statements are affected by estimates and judgments that are necessary to comply with generally accepted accounting principles. We base our estimates on prior experience and other assumptions that we consider reasonable to our circumstances. Actual results could differ from our estimates, which would affect the related amounts reported in our financial statements. While estimates and judgments are applied in arriving at many reported amounts, we believe that the following matters may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

 

32


Index to Financial Statements

Contingencies—As discussed in Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements, we are involved in various legal proceedings and contingencies. We have recorded liabilities for these matters in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” (“FAS 5”). FAS 5 requires a liability to be recorded based on our estimate of the probable cost of the resolution of a contingency. The actual resolution of these contingencies may differ from our estimates. If a contingency is settled for an amount greater than our estimate, a future charge to income would result. Likewise, if a contingency is settled for an amount that is less than our estimate, a future credit to income would result.

 

The events that may impact our contingent liabilities are often unique and generally are not predictable. At the time a contingency is identified, we consider all relevant facts as part of our FAS 5 evaluation. We record a liability for a loss that meets the recognition criteria of FAS 5. These criteria require recognition of a liability when the loss is probable of occurring and reasonably estimable. Events may arise that were not anticipated and the outcome of a contingency may result in a loss to us that differs from our previously estimated liability. These factors could result in a material difference between estimated and actual operating results. Contingent losses that meet the recognition criteria under FAS 5, excluding those related to income taxes and self insurance which are discussed further below, were not material to the Company’s financial position as of December 31, 2005. In addition, we have certain contingent liabilities that have not been recognized as of December 31, 2005, because a loss is not reasonably estimable.

Goodwill ImpairmentTheWe account for goodwill in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“FAS 142”), in June 2001. As a result of the issuance of this standard, goodwill is no longer amortized, but is subjected towhich requires annual impairment testing.testing of goodwill for each of our reporting units. Goodwill impairment testing requires that we estimate the fair value of our goodwill and compare that estimate to the amount of goodwill recorded on our balance sheet.

We use a discounted cash flow model (DCF model) to estimate the fair value of our goodwill. The estimationcompletion of fair valuethe DCF model requires that we make judgments concerninga number of significant assumptions to produce an estimate of future cash flowsflows. These assumptions include projections of future revenue, costs and appropriate discount rates. Our estimateworking capital changes. In addition, we make assumptions about the estimated cost of capital and other relevant variables, as required, in estimating the fair value of goodwill couldour reporting units. The projections that we use in our DCF model are updated annually and will change over time based on a varietythe historical performance and changing business conditions for each of factors, including the actual operating performance of the underlyingour reporting units. Upon adoption

As of FAS 142, weDecember 31, 2005, our recorded a non-cash impairment chargegoodwill was $2.549 billion, of $72 million ($0.06 per diluted share), as of January 1, 2002, relatedwhich $2.259 billion relates to our Mail Technologies business. The primary factorSupply Chain and Freight segment. This segment of our business has experienced rapid growth over the last several years, largely due to a number of acquisitions that we have made. Because of its growth, this segment continues to experience significant change as we integrate the acquired companies, resulting in the impairment charge was the lowerhigher volatility in our DCF model projections than anticipated growth experienced in the expedited mail delivery business. In conjunction withfor our annual test of goodwill in 2002, we recorded an additional impairment charge of $2 million related to our Mail Technologies business, resulting in total goodwill impairment of $74 million for 2002.other segments. Our annual impairment tests performed in 20032005, 2004 and 20042003 resulted in no goodwill impairment. As of December 31, 2004, our recorded goodwill was $1.255 billion.

 

Self-Insurance Accruals—We self-insure costs associated with workers’ compensation claims, automotive liability, health and welfare, and general business liabilities, up to certain limits. Insurance reserves are established for estimates of the loss that we will ultimately incur on reported claims, as well as estimates of claims that have been incurred but not yet reported. Recorded balances are based on reserve levels determined by outside actuaries, who incorporate historical loss experience and judgments about the present and expected levels of cost per claim. Trends in actual experience are a significant factor in the determination of such reserves. We believe our estimated reserves for such claims are adequate, but actual experience in claim frequency and/or severity could materially differ from our estimates and affect our results of operations.

 

Workers compensation, automobile liability and general liability insurance claims may take several years to completely settle. Consequently, actuarial estimates are required to project the ultimate cost that will be incurred to fully resolve the claims. A number of factors can affect the actual cost of a claim, including the length of time

33


Index to Financial Statements

the claim remains open, trends in health care costs and the results of related litigation. Furthermore, claims may emerge in future years for events that occurred in a prior year at a rate that differs from previous actuarial projections. Changes in state legislation with respect to workers compensation can affect the adequacy of our self-insurance accruals. All of these factors can result in revisions to prior actuarial projections and produce a material difference between estimated and actual operating results.

We sponsor a number of health and welfare insurance plans for our employees. We use estimates from third party actuaries to establish the liabilities for these plans. These liabilities and related expenses are based on estimates of the number of employees and eligible dependents covered under the plans, anticipated medical usage by participants and overall trends in medical costs and inflation. Actual results may differ from these estimates and, therefore, produce a material difference between estimated and actual operating results.

Pension and Postretirement Medical BenefitsThe Company’sOur pension and other postretirement benefit costs are calculated using various actuarial assumptions and methodologies as prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” and Statement of Financial

34


Accounting Standards No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions.” These assumptions include discount rates, health care cost trend rates, inflation, rate of compensation increases, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, and other factors. Actual results that differ from our assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect our recognized expense and recorded obligation in such future periods. We believe that the assumptions utilized in recording the obligations under our plans are reasonable based on input from our outside actuaries and other advisors and information as to historical experience and performance. Differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect our pension and other postretirement obligations and future expense. A 25 basis point change in the assumed discount rate, expected return on assets, and health care cost trend rate for the pension and postretirement benefit plans would result in the following increases (decreases) on the Company’s costs and obligations for the year 2005 (in millions):

   

25 Basis Point

Increase


  

25 Basis Point

Decrease


 

Pension Plans

         

Discount Rate:

         

Effect on net periodic benefit cost

  $(54) $55 

Effect on projected benefit obligation

   (548)  571 

Return on Assets:

         

Effect on net periodic benefit cost

   (26)  26 

Postretirement Medical Plans

         

Discount Rate:

         

Effect on net periodic benefit cost

   (5)  5 

Effect on projected benefit obligation

   (77)  79 

Health Care Cost Trend Rate:

         

Effect on net periodic benefit cost

   3   (2)

Effect on projected benefit obligation

   22   (14)

 

Financial Instruments—As discussed in Notes 2, 3, 8, and 16 to our consolidated financial statements, and in the “Market Risk” section of this report, we hold and issue financial instruments that contain elements of market risk. Certain of these financial instruments are required to be recorded at fair value. Fair values are based on listed market prices, when such prices are available. To the extent that listed market prices are not available, fair value is determined based on other relevant factors, including dealer price quotations. Certain financial instruments, including over-the-counter derivative instruments, are valued using pricing models that consider, among other factors, contractual and market prices, correlations, time value, credit spreads, and yield curve

34


Index to Financial Statements

volatility factors. Changes in the fixed income, equity, foreign exchange, and commodity markets will impact our estimates of fair value in the future, potentially affecting our results of operations. A quantitative sensitivity analysis of our exposure to changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and equity prices is presented in the “Market Risk” section of this report.

 

Depreciation, Residual Value, and Impairment of Fixed Assets—As of December 31, 2004,2005, we had approximately $14.0$15.289 billion of net fixed assets, the most significant category of which is aircraft. In accounting for fixed assets, we make estimates about the expected useful lives and the expected residual values of the assets, and the potential for impairment based on the fair values of the assets and the cash flows generated by these assets.

 

In estimating the lives and expected residual values of aircraft, we have relied upon actual experience with the same or similar aircraft types. Subsequent revisions to these estimates could be caused by changes to our maintenance program, changes in the utilization of the aircraft, governmental regulations on aging aircraft, and changing market prices of new and used aircraft of the same or similar types. We periodically evaluate these estimates and assumptions, and adjust the estimates and assumptions as necessary. Adjustments to the expected lives and residual values are accounted for on a prospective basis through depreciation expense.

 

When appropriate,In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“FAS 144”), we evaluate our fixedreview long-lived assets for impairment. Factorsimpairment when circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable based on the undiscounted future cash flows of the asset. If the carrying amount of the asset is determined not to be recoverable, a write-down to fair value is recorded. Fair values are determined based on quoted market values, discounted cash flows, or external appraisals, as applicable. We review long-lived assets for impairment at the individual asset or the asset group level for which the lowest level of independent cash flows can be identified. The circumstances that would indicate potential impairment may include, but are not limited to, a significant change in the extent to which an asset is utilized, a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, and operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of the asset. In estimating cash flows, we project future volume levels for our different air express products in all geographic regions in which we do business. Adverse changes in these volume forecasts, or a shortfall of our actual volume compared with our projections, could result in our current aircraft capacity exceeding current or projected demand. This situation would lead to an excess of a particular aircraft type, resulting in an aircraft impairment charge or a reduction of the expected life of an aircraft type (thus resulting in increased depreciation expense).

 

In December 2003, we permanently removed from service a number of Boeing 727 and McDonnell Douglas DC-8 aircraft. As a result, we conducted an impairment evaluation, which resulted in a $75 million impairment charge during the fourth quarter for these aircraft (including the related engines), $69 million of which impacted the U.S. domestic package segment and $6 million of which impacted the international package segment.

 

In December 2004, we permanently removed from service a number of Boeing 727, 747 and McDonnell Douglas DC-8 aircraft. As a result of the actual and planned retirement of these aircraft, we conducted an impairment evaluation, which resulted in a $110 million impairment charge during the fourth quarter for these aircraft (including the related engines and parts), $91 million of which impacted the U.S. domestic package segment and $19 million of which impacted the international package segment.

 

These charges are classified in the caption “other expenses” within other operating expenses (see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements). UPS continues to operate all of its other aircraft and continues to experience positive cash flow.flow, and no impairments of aircraft were recognized in 2005.

 

Income Taxes—We operate in numerous countries around the world and are subject to income taxes in many jurisdictions. We estimate our annual effective income tax rate based on statutory income tax rates in these

35


Index to Financial Statements

jurisdictions and takingtake into consideration items that are treated differently for financial reporting and tax

35


purposes. The process of estimating our effective income tax rate involves judgments related to tax planning and expectations regarding future events. The increasing profitabilityevents, including the impact of our International segment increasesadjustments, if any, resulting from the significanceresolution of our non-U.S. incomeaudits of open tax provision to our overall effective income tax rate. years by the Internal Revenue Service or other taxing authorities.

We recognize deferred tax assets for items that will generate tax deductions or credits in future years. Realization of deferred tax assets requires sufficient future taxable income (subject to any carry-forward limitations) in the applicable jurisdictions. We make judgments regarding the realizability of deferred tax assets based, in part, on estimates of future taxable income. A valuation allowance is established for the portion, if any, of the deferred tax assets that we conclude cannot be realized. Income tax related contingency matters also affect our effective income tax rate. In this regard, we make judgments related to the identification and quantification of income tax related contingency matters.

During 2004 and 2003, the resolution of tax matters with the Internal Revenue Service and other taxing authorities produced reductions in income tax expense of $142 and $77 million, respectively.

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and other parts of this report contain “forward-looking” statements about matters that inherently are difficult to predict. The words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “we see,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements include statements regarding our intent, belief and current expectations about our strategic direction, prospects and future results. We have described some of the important factors that affect these statements as we discussed each subject. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and certain factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements.

 

Risk Factors

 

The following are some of the factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expected results described in our forward-looking statements:

 

The effect of general economic and other conditions in the markets in which we operate, both in the United States and internationally. Our operations in international markets are also affected by currency exchange and inflation risks.

 

The impact of competition on a local, regional, national, and international basis. Our competitors include the postal services of the U.S. and other nations, various motor carriers, express companies, freight forwarders, air couriers and others. Our industry is undergoing rapid consolidation, and the combining entities are competing aggressively for business.

 

The impact of complex and stringent aviation, transportation, environmental, labor, employment and other governmental laws and regulations, and the impact of new laws and regulations that may result from increased security concerns following the events of September 11, 2001.about homeland security. Our failure to comply with applicable laws, ordinances or regulations could result in substantial fines or possible revocation of our authority to conduct our operations.

 

Strikes, work stoppages and slowdowns by our employees. Such actions may affect our ability to meet our customers needs, and customers may do more business with competitors if they believe that such actions may adversely affect our ability to provide service. We may face permanent loss of customers if we are unable to provide uninterrupted service. The terms of future collective bargaining agreements also may affect our competitive position and results of operations.

 

36


Index to Financial Statements
Possible disruption of supplies, or an increase in the prices, of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel for our aircraft and delivery vehicles as a result of war or other factors. We require significant quantities of fuel and are exposed to the commodity price risk associated with variations in the market price for petroleum products.

 

Cyclical and seasonal fluctuations in our operating results due to decreased demand for our services.

 

3637


Index to Financial Statements
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Information about market risk can be found in Item 7 of this report under the caption “Market Risk.”

 

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

Our financial statements are filed together with this report. See the Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules on page F-1 for a list of the financial statements filed together with this report. Supplementary data appear in Note 1918 to our financial statements.

 

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.

 

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

 

As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including our Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer and Chief Financial Officer,chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. Based upon, and as of the date of thatthe evaluation, our Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer and Chief Financial Officerchief financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting were effective in all material respects, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. There has been no

During 2005, the Supply Chain and Freight segment of our Company migrated significant freight services transaction volume previously processed by separate operating systems to a single freight operating system (E2K). The E2K freight operating system was utilized by Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, a company we acquired in 2004. This migration represents a significant change to the processes and controls for this segment of our business.

Also during 2005, the Company completed the acquisitions of Overnite Corporation and other entities. The Company performed due diligence procedures associated with the acquisition of these entities and is in ourthe process of incorporating the separate financial reporting processes applicable to these entities into the Company’s internal control structure.

There were no other changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2004year ended December 31, 2005 that hashave materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, ourthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

See page F-2 for management’s report on internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 9B.Other Information

 

None.

 

3738


Index to Financial Statements

PART III

 

Item 10.Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

Information about our directors and our audit committee financial expert is presented under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Committees of the Board of Directors — Audit Committee” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on May 5, 20054, 2006 and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Information about our executive officers can be found in Part I Item 1A, of this report under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in accordance with Instruction 3 of Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K and General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K.

 

Information about our Code of Business Conduct is presented under the caption “Where You Can Find More Information” in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

 

Information about our compliance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is presented under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on May 5, 20054, 2006 and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 11.Executive Compensation

 

Information about executive compensation is presented under the caption “Compensation of Executive Officers and Directors,” excluding the information under the caption “Report of the Compensation Committee,” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on May 5, 20054, 2006 and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

Information about security ownership is presented under the caption “Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on May 5, 20054, 2006 and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Information about our equity compensation plans is presented under the caption “Equity Compensation Plans” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on May 5, 20054, 2006 and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

None.

 

Item 14.Principal Accountant and Fees and Services

 

Information about aggregate fees billed to us by our principal accountant is presented under the caption “Principal Accounting Firm Fees” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meetings of Shareowners to be held on May 5, 20054, 2006 and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

3839


Index to Financial Statements

PART IV

 

Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a) 1.Financial Statements.

 

See the Index to Financial Statements on page F-1 for a list of the financial statements filed with this report.

 

2.Financial Statement Schedules.

 

None.

 

3.List of Exhibits.

 

See the Exhibit Index for a list of the exhibits incorporated by reference into or filed with this report.

 

(b)Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

 

See the Exhibit Index for a list of the exhibits incorporated by reference into or filed with this report.

 

(c)Financial Statement Schedules.

 

None.

 

3940


Index to Financial Statements

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, United Parcel Service, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.

(REGISTRANT)

By:

 

/S/    MICHAEL L. ESKEW


  Michael L. Eskew
  Chairman and
  Chief Executive Officer

 

Date: March 10, 200514, 2006

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature


  

Title


 

Date


/S/    JOHN J. BEYSTEHNER


John J. Beystehner

  Chief Operating
Officer and Director
 

March 10, 2005

14, 2006

/S/    CMALVINICHAEL DJ. BARDENURNS        


Calvin DardenMichael J. Burns

  Senior Vice President
and

Director

 

March 10, 2005

11, 2006

/S/    D. SCOTT DAVIS


D. Scott Davis

  

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer (Principaland Director
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

March 14, 2006

/S/    STUART E. EIZENSTAT        


Stuart E. Eizenstat

  

Director

March 10, 2005

12, 2006

/S/    MICHAEL L. ESKEW


Michael L. Eskew

  

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
Director (Principal Executive Officer)

 

March 10, 2005

14, 2006

/S/    JAMES P. KELLY


James P. Kelly

  

Director

 March 10, 20052006

/S/    ANN M. LIVERMORE


Ann M. Livermore

  

Director

 March 10, 2005

/S/    GARY E. MACDOUGAL


Gary E. MacDougal

  

Director

 March 10, 200514, 2006

/S/    VICTOR A. PELSON


Victor A. Pelson

  

Director

 March 10, 2005

/S/    LEA N. SOUPATA


Lea N. Soupata

Senior Vice President and DirectorMarch 10, 20052006

/S/    JOHN W. THOMPSON


John W. Thompson

  

Director

 March 9, 200514, 2006

/S/    CAROL B. TOMÉ


Carol B. Tomé

  

Director

 March 10, 200514, 2006

/S/    BEN VERWAAYEN        


Ben Verwaayen

Director

March 14, 2006

 

4041


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

Item 8—Financial Statements

 

   

Page

Number


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

  F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

  

F-3

Report of Independent RegisteredRegistered Public Accounting Firm

  F-5

Consolidated balance sheets—December 31, 20042005 and 20032004

  F-6

Statements of consolidated income—Years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003

  F-7

Statements of consolidated shareowners’ equity—Years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003

  F-8

Statements of consolidated cash flows—Years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 2003 and 20022003

  F-9

Notes to consolidated financial statements

  F-10

 

F-1


Index to Financial Statements

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

UPS management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting for United Parcel Service, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“the Company”). Based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, management has assessed the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as effective as of December 31, 2004. The scope of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting includes all of the Company’s businesses except for Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, a business acquired on December 20, 2004. Menlo constituted less than 3% of total assets as of December 31, 2004 and less than 1% of total revenue and net income for the year then ended. Further discussion of this acquisition can be found in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements.2005. The registered independent public accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP, as auditors of the consolidated balance sheet of United Parcel Service, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 20042005 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareowners’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2004,2005, has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

United Parcel Service, Inc.

March 14, 20052006

 

F-2


Index to Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Board of Directors and Shareowners

United Parcel Service, Inc.

Atlanta, Georgia

 

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that United Parcel Service, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,2005, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management excluded from their assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, Inc., which was acquired on December 20, 2004 and whose financial statements reflect total assets and revenues constituting less than 3% and 1%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, Inc. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective

F-3


internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,2005, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

F-3


Index to Financial Statements

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of United Parcel Service, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004,2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareownersshareowners’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 20042005 of the Company and our report dated March 14, 20052006 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Atlanta, Georgia

March 14, 20052006

 

F-4


Index to Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Board of Directors and Shareowners

United Parcel Service, Inc.

Atlanta, Georgia

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of United Parcel Service, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareowners’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004.2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of United Parcel Service, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20042005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” effective January 1, 2002; and began applying prospectively the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” effective January 1, 2003.

 

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,2005, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 14, 20052006 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Atlanta, Georgia

March 14, 20052006

 

F-5


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions, except per share amounts)

 

  December 31,

   December 31,

 
  2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 
ASSETS          

Current Assets:

      

Cash & cash equivalents

  $739  $1,064   $1,369  $739 

Marketable securities & short-term investments

   4,458   2,888    1,672   4,458 

Accounts receivable, net

   5,156   4,004    5,950   5,156 

Finance receivables, net

   524   840    411   524 

Income tax receivable

   371   —      —     371 

Deferred income taxes

   392   316    475   392 

Other current assets

   965   847    1,126   965 
  


 


  


 


Total Current Assets

   12,605   9,959    11,003   12,605 

Property, Plant & Equipment—at cost, net of accumulated depreciation & amortization of $13,505 and $12,516 in 2004 and 2003

   13,973   13,298 

Property, Plant & Equipment—at cost, net of accumulated depreciation & amortization of $14,268 and $13,505 in 2005 and 2004

   15,289   13,973 

Prepaid Pension Costs

   3,160   2,922    3,932   3,222 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net

   1,924   1,883 

Goodwill

   2,549   1,255 

Intangible Assets, Net

   684   669 

Other Assets

   1,364   1,672    1,765   1,364 
  


 


  


 


  $33,026  $29,734   $35,222  $33,088 
  


 


  


 


LIABILITIES AND SHAREOWNERS’ EQUITY          

Current Liabilities:

      

Current maturities of long-term debt and commercial paper

  $1,187  $674   $821  $1,187 

Accounts payable

   2,266   2,003    2,352   2,312 

Accrued wages & withholdings

   1,197   1,166    1,324   1,197 

Dividends payable

   315   282    364   315 

Income taxes payable

   180   79 

Other current liabilities

   1,518   1,499    1,752   1,439 
  


 


  


 


Total Current Liabilities

   6,483   5,624    6,793   6,529 

Long-Term Debt

   3,261   3,149    3,159   3,261 

Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation, Net

   1,516   1,335    1,704   1,470 

Deferred Taxes, Credits & Other Liabilities

   5,382   4,774    6,682   5,450 

Shareowners’ Equity:

      

Preferred stock, no par value, authorized 200 shares, none issued

   —     —      —     —   

Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 4,600 shares, issued 515 and 571 in 2004 and 2003

   5   6 

Class B common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 5,600 shares, issued 614 and 560 in 2004 and 2003

   6   5 

Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 4,600 shares, issued 454 and 515 in 2005 and 2004

   5   5 

Class B common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 5,600 shares, issued 646 and 614 in 2005 and 2004

   6   6 

Additional paid-in capital

   417   662    —     417 

Retained earnings

   16,192   14,356    17,037   16,192 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (236)  (177)   (164)  (242)

Deferred compensation obligations

   169   136    161   169 
  


 


  


 


   16,553   14,988    17,045   16,547 

Less: Treasury stock (3 and 2 shares in 2004 and 2003)

   (169)  (136)

Less: Treasury stock (3 shares in 2005 and 2004)

   (161)  (169)
  


 


  


 


   16,384   14,852    16,884   16,378 
  


 


  


 


  $33,026  $29,734   $35,222  $33,088 
  


 


  


 


 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

F-6


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME

(In millions, except per share amounts)

 

  Years Ended December 31,

   Years Ended December 31,

 
  2004

 2003

 2002

   2005

 2004

 2003

 

Revenue

  $36,582  $33,485  $31,272   $42,581  $36,582  $33,485 

Operating Expenses:

      

Compensation and benefits

   20,916   19,328   17,940    22,517   20,823   19,251 

Other

   10,677   9,712   9,236    13,921   10,770   9,789 
  


 


 


  


 


 


   31,593   29,040   27,176    36,438   31,593   29,040 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Operating Profit

   4,989   4,445   4,096    6,143   4,989   4,445 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Other Income and (Expense):

      

Investment income

   82   18   63    104   82   18 

Interest expense

   (149)  (121)  (173)   (172)  (149)  (121)

Gain on redemption of long-term debt

   —     28   —      —     —     28 

Tax assessment reversal

   —     —     1,023 
  


 


 


  


 


 


   (67)  (75)  913    (68)  (67)  (75)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Income Before Income Taxes And Cumulative Effect of Change In Accounting Principle

   4,922   4,370   5,009 

Income Before Income Taxes

   6,075   4,922   4,370 

Income Taxes

   1,589   1,472   1,755    2,205   1,589   1,472 
  


 


 


Income Before Cumulative Effect of Change In Accounting Principle

   3,333   2,898   3,254 

Cumulative Effect of Change In Accounting Principle, Net of Taxes

   —     —     (72)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Net Income

  $3,333  $2,898  $3,182   $3,870  $3,333  $2,898 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Basic Earnings Per Share Before Cumulative Effect Of Change In Accounting Principle

  $2.95  $2.57  $2.91 
  


 


 


Basic Earnings Per Share

  $2.95  $2.57  $2.84   $3.48  $2.95  $2.57 
  


 


 


Diluted Earnings Per Share Before Cumulative Effect Of Change In Accounting Principle

  $2.93  $2.55  $2.87 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Diluted Earnings Per Share

  $2.93  $2.55  $2.81   $3.47  $2.93  $2.55 
  


 


 


  


 


 


 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

F-7


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED SHAREOWNERS’ EQUITY

(In millions, except per share amounts)

 

  2004

 2003

 2002

  2005

 2004

 2003

 
  Shares

 Dollars

 Shares

 Dollars

 Shares

 Dollars

  Shares

 Dollars

 Shares

 Dollars

 Shares

 Dollars

 

Class A Common Stock

    

Balance at beginning of year

  571  $6  642  $7  772  $8  515  $5  571  $6  642  $7 

Common stock purchases

  (12)  —    (5)  —    (10)  —    (16)  —    (12)  —    (5)  —   

Stock award plans

  12   —    12   —    11   —    2   —    12   —    12   —   

Common stock issuances

  3   —    2   —    2   —    3   —    3   —    2   —   

Conversions of Class A to Class B common stock

  (59)  (1) (80)  (1) (133)  (1) (50)  —    (59)  (1) (80)  (1)
  

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


Balance at end of year

  515   5  571   6  642   7  454   5  515   5  571   6 
  

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


Class B Common Stock

    

Balance at beginning of year

  560   5  482   4  349   3  614   6  560   5  482   4 

Common stock purchases

  (5)  —    (2)  —    —     —    (18)  —    (5)  —    (2)  —   

Conversions of Class A to Class B common stock

  59   1  80   1  133   1  50   —    59   1  80   1 
  

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


Balance at end of year

  614   6  560   5  482   4  646   6  614   6  560   5 
  

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


Additional Paid-In Capital

    

Balance at beginning of year

    662   387   414   417   662   387 

Stock award plans

    677   545   477   335   677   545 

Common stock purchases

    (1,075)  (398)  (604)  (922)  (1,075)  (398)

Common stock issuances

    153   128   100   170   153   128 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Balance at end of year

    417   662   387   —     417   662 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Retained Earnings

    

Balance at beginning of year

    14,356   12,495   10,162   16,192   14,356   12,495 

Net income

    3,333   2,898   3,182   3,870   3,333   2,898 

Dividends ($1.12, $0.92, and $0.76)

    (1,262)  (1,037)  (849)

Dividends ($1.32, $1.12, and $0.92)

  (1,468)  (1,262)  (1,037)

Common stock purchases

    (235)  —     —     (1,557)  (235)  —   
   


 


 


 


 


 


Balance at end of year

    16,192   14,356   12,495   17,037   16,192   14,356 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

   

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment:

    

Balance at beginning of year

    (56)  (328)  (269)  (127)  (56)  (328)

Aggregate adjustment for the year

    (71)  272   (59)  (36)  (71)  272 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Balance at end of year

    (127)  (56)  (328)  (163)  (127)  (56)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax:

    

Balance at beginning of year

    14   (34)  (21)  (5)  14   (34)

Current period changes in fair value (net of tax effect of $(10), $13, and $(9))

    (18)  21   (16)

Reclassification to earnings (net of tax effect of $(1), $17, and $1)

    (1)  27   3 

Current period changes in fair value (net of tax effect of $0, $(10), and $13)

  —     (18)  21 

Reclassification to earnings (net of tax effect of $10, $(1), and $17)

  16   (1)  27 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Balance at end of year

    (5)  14   (34)  11   (5)  14 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax:

    

Balance at beginning of year

    (72)  (26)  (49)  (29)  (72)  (26)

Current period changes in fair value (net of tax effect of $21, $(6), and $6)

    37   (9)  10 

Reclassification to earnings (net of tax effect of $4, $(21), and $9)

    6   (37)  13 

Current period changes in fair value (net of tax effect of $81, $21, and $(6))

  135   37   (9)

Reclassification to earnings (net of tax effect of $(14), $4, and $(21))

  (23)  6   (37)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Balance at end of year

    (29)  (72)  (26)  83   (29)  (72)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Additional minimum pension liability, net of tax:

    

Balance at beginning of year

    (63)  (50)  —     (81)  (63)  (50)

Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of tax effect of $(5), $(6), and $(31))

    (12)  (13)  (50)

Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of tax effect of $(8), $(10), and $(6))

  (14)  (18)  (13)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Balance at end of year

    (75)  (63)  (50)  (95)  (81)  (63)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Accumulated other comprehensive income at end of year

    (236)  (177)  (438)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at end of year

  (164)  (242)  (177)
   


 


 


 


 


 


Deferred Compensation Obligations

    

Balance at beginning of year

    136   84   47   169   136   84 

Common stock held for deferred compensation obligations

    33   52   37   (8)  33   52 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Balance at end of year

    169   136   84   161   169   136 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Treasury Stock

    

Balance at beginning of year

  (2)  (136) (1)  (84) (1)  (47) (3)  (169) (2)  (136) (1)  (84)

Common stock held for deferred compensation obligations

  (1)  (33) (1)  (52) —     (37) —     8  (1)  (33) (1)  (52)
  

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


Balance at end of year

  (3)  (169) (2)  (136) (1)  (84) (3)  (161) (3)  (169) (2)  (136)
  

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


 

 


Total Shareowners’ Equity at End of Year

   $16,384  $14,852  $12,455  $16,884  $16,378  $14,852 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Comprehensive Income

   $3,274  $3,159  $3,083  $3,948  $3,268  $3,159 
   


 


 


 


 


 


 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

F-8


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS

(In millions)

 

  Years Ended December 31,

   Years Ended December 31,

 
  2004

 2003

 2002

   2005

 2004

 2003

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:

      

Net income

  $3,333  $2,898  $3,182   $3,870  $3,333  $2,898 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

      

Depreciation and amortization

   1,543  ��1,549   1,464    1,644   1,543   1,549 

Postretirement benefits

   135   84   121    115   135   84 

Deferred taxes, credits and other

   289   317   162    477   289   317 

Stock award plans

   610   497   445    234   610  ��497 

Tax assessment reversal

   —     —     (776)

Vacation policy change

   —     —     (121)

Restructuring charge and related expenses

   —     —     85 

Loss (gain) on impairment or disposal of assets

   129   55   19 

Other (gains) losses

   15   96   116    28   144   151 

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:

      

Accounts receivable, net

   (686)  (264)  312    (647)  (686)  (264)

Other assets

   390   13   403 

Other current assets

   213   390   13 

Prepaid pension costs

   (238)  (990)  (87)   (695)  (238)  (990)

Accounts payable

   318   66   (56)   158   318   66 

Accrued wages and withholdings

   (73)  83   112    56   (73)  83 

Income taxes payable

   (399)  204   16    179   (399)  204 

Other current liabilities

   (35)  (32)  291    161   (35)  (32)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Net cash from operating activities

   5,331   4,576   5,688    5,793   5,331   4,576 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Cash Flows From Investing Activities:

      

Capital expenditures

   (2,127)  (1,947)  (1,658)   (2,187)  (2,127)  (1,947)

Disposals of property, plant and equipment

   75   118   89    27   75   118 

Purchases of marketable securities and short-term investments

   (6,322)  (8,083)  (3,833)   (7,623)  (6,322)  (8,083)

Sales and maturities of marketable securities and short-term investments

   4,724   7,118   2,654    10,375   4,724   7,118 

Net (increase) decrease in finance receivables

   318   50   (495)

Cash received (paid) for business acquisitions / dispositions

   (238)  8   (14)

Net decrease in finance receivables

   95   318   50 

Cash received (paid) for business acquisitions & dispositions

   (1,488)  (238)  8 

Other investing activities

   (68)  (6)  (24)   (174)  (68)  (6)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Net cash (used in) investing activities

   (3,638)  (2,742)  (3,281)   (975)  (3,638)  (2,742)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Cash Flows From Financing Activities:

      

Proceeds from borrowings

   811   361   419    128   811   361 

Repayments of borrowings

   (468)  (1,245)  (1,099)   (589)  (468)  (1,245)

Purchases of common stock

   (1,310)  (398)  (604)   (2,479)  (1,310)  (398)

Issuances of common stock

   193   154   116    164   193   154 

Dividends

   (1,208)  (956)  (840)   (1,391)  (1,208)  (956)

Other financing activities

   (32)  (26)  (82)   (8)  (32)  (26)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Net cash (used in) financing activities

   (2,014)  (2,110)  (2,090)   (4,175)  (2,014)  (2,110)
  


 


 


  


 


 


Effect Of Exchange Rate Changes On Cash

   (4)  216   (51)   (13)  (4)  216 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash And Cash Equivalents

   (325)  (60)  266    630   (325)  (60)

Cash And Cash Equivalents:

      

Beginning of period

   1,064   1,124   858    739   1,064   1,124 
  


 


 


  


 


 


End of period

  $739  $1,064  $1,124   $1,369  $739  $1,064 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Cash Paid During The Period For:

      

Interest (net of amount capitalized)

  $120  $126  $190   $169  $120  $126 
  


 


 


  


 


 


Income taxes

  $2,037  $1,097  $1,416   $1,465  $2,037  $1,097 
  


 


 


  


 


 


 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

F-9


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of Financial Statements and Business Activities

 

The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of United Parcel Service, Inc., and all of its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively “UPS” or the “Company”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

 

UPS concentrates its operations in the field of transportation services, primarily domestic and international letter and package delivery. Through our non-packageSupply Chain & Freight subsidiaries, we are also a global provider of specialized transportation, logistics, and financial services.

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

U.S. Domestic and International Package Operations—Revenue is recognized upon delivery of a letter or package.

 

UPS Supply Chain SolutionsForwarding Services and Logistics—Freight forwarding revenue and the expense related to the transportation of freight is recognized at the time the services are performed in accordance with EITF 99-19 “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an Agent”. Material management and distribution revenue is recognized upon performance of the service provided. Customs brokerage revenue is recognized upon completing documents necessary for customs entry purposes.

 

UPS Capital—Income on loans and direct finance leases is recognized on the effective interest method. Accrual of interest income is suspended at the earlier of the time at which collection of an account becomes doubtful or the account becomes 90 days delinquent. Income on operating leases is recognized on the straight-line method over the terms of the underlying leases.

 

UPS Freight—Revenue is recognized in accordance with EITF 91-9 “Revenue and Expense Recognition for Freight Services in Process.” For transactions in which we are the sole service provider, we use the percentage of completion method, based upon average transit time to recognize revenue.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into cash. We consider securities with maturities of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents. The carrying amount of these securities approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

 

In 2004, we began classifying all auction rate preferred and debt instruments as marketable securities. Previously, such securities were classified as cash equivalents if the auction reset periods were three months or less. Auction rate securities held at December 31, 2003 totaling $1.887 billion were reclassified from cash equivalents into marketable securities for consistent presentation on our consolidated balance sheet.

Marketable Securities and Short-Term Investments

 

Marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, with related unrealized gains and losses reported, net of tax, as accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”), a separate component of shareowners’ equity. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and

 

F-10


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

of shareowners’ equity. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization and accretion is included in investment income, along with interest and dividends. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method; realized gains and losses resulting from such sales are included in investment income.

 

Investment securities are reviewed for impairment in accordance with FASB Statement No. 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” and EITF 03-01FASB Staff Position (FSP) 115-1 “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.” We periodically review our investments for indications of other than temporary impairment considering many factors, including the extent and duration to which a security’s fair value has been less than its cost, overall economic and market conditions, and the financial condition and specific prospects for the issuer. Impairment of investment securities results in a charge to income when a market decline below cost is other than temporary.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are as follows: Vehicles—94.5 to 15 years; Aircraft—12 to 20 years; Buildings—2010 to 40 years; Leasehold Improvements—lives of leases; Plant Equipment—8 1/35 to 10 years; Technology Equipment—3 to 5 years. The costs of major airframe and engine overhauls, as well as routine maintenance and repairs, are charged to expense as incurred.

 

Interest incurred during the construction period of certain property, plant and equipment is capitalized until the underlying assets are placed in service, at which time amortization of the capitalized interest begins, straight-line, over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Capitalized interest was $32, $25, and $25 million for each of the years2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002,2003, respectively.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

In accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” we review long-lived assets for impairment when circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable based on the undiscounted future cash flows of the asset. If the carrying amount of the asset is determined not to be recoverable, a write-down to fair value is recorded. Fair values are determined based on quoted market values, discounted cash flows, or external appraisals, as applicable. We review long-lived assets for impairment at the individual asset or the asset group level for which the lowest level of independent cash flows can be identified.

 

In December 2003, we permanently removed from service a number of Boeing 727 and McDonnell Douglas DC-8 aircraft. As a result, we conducted an impairment evaluation, which resulted in a $75 million impairment charge during the fourth quarter for these aircraft (including the related engines), $69 million of which impacted the U.S. domestic package segment and $6 million of which impacted the international package segment.

 

In December 2004, we permanently removed from service a number of Boeing 727, 747 and McDonnell Douglas DC-8 aircraft. As a result of the actual and planned retirement of these aircraft, we conducted an impairment evaluation, which resulted in a $110 million impairment charge during the fourth quarter for these aircraft (including the related engines and parts), $91 million of which impacted the U.S. domestic package segment and $19 million of which impacted the international package segment.

 

These charges are classified in the caption “other expenses” within other operating expenses (see Note 13). UPS continues to operate all of its other aircraft and continues to experience positive cash flow.flow, and no impairments of aircraft were recognized in 2005.

 

F-11


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

Costs of purchased businesses in excess of net assets acquired (goodwill), and intangible assets are accounted for under the provisions of FASB Statement No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“FAS 142”). Upon adoption ofUnder FAS 142, we wereare required to test all existing goodwill for impairment as of January 1, 2002, and at least annually, thereafter, unless changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred sooner. We are required to test goodwill on a “reporting unit” basis. A reporting unit is the operating segment unless, for businesses within that operating segment, discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by management, in which case such a component business is the reporting unit.

 

A fair value approach is used to test goodwill for impairment. An impairment charge is recognized for the amount, if any, by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value. Fair values are established using discounted cash flows. When available and as appropriate, comparative market multiples were used to corroborate discounted cash flow results.

We recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $72 million ($0.06 per diluted share) as of January 1, 2002, related to our Mail Technologies business. This charge was reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The primary factor resulting in the impairment charge was the lower than anticipated growth experienced in the expedited mail delivery business. In conjunction with our annual test of goodwill in 2002, we recorded an additional impairment charge of $2 million related to our Mail Technologies business, resulting in total goodwill impairment of $74 million for 2002. We sold the Mail Technologies business unit during the second quarter of 2003 (see Note 7). Our annual impairment tests performed in 2005, 2004, and 2003 resulted in no goodwill impairment.

 

Finite-lived intangible assets, including trademarks, licenses, patents, customer lists and franchise rights are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 52 to 20 years. Capitalized software is amortized over periods ranging from 3 to 5 years. In 2004, we began classifying software as intangible assets. Previously, capitalized software was classified within property, plant and equipment. Capitalized software at December 31, 2003 totaling $610 million was reclassified from property, plant and equipment into intangible assets for consistent presentation on our consolidated balance sheet.

 

Self-Insurance Accruals

 

We self-insure costs associated with workers’ compensation claims, automotive liability, health and welfare, and general business liabilities, up to certain limits. Insurance reserves are established for estimates of the loss that we will ultimately incur on reported claims, as well as estimates of claims that have been incurred but not yet reported. Recorded balances are based on reserve levels determined by outside actuaries, who incorporate historical loss experience and judgments about the present and expected levels of cost per claim.

 

Income Taxes

 

Income taxes are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“FAS 109”). FAS 109 is an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences, FAS 109 generally considers all expected future events other than proposed changes in the tax law or rates. Valuation allowances are provided if it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

 

We record accruals for tax contingencies related to potential assessments by tax authorities. Such accruals are based on management’s judgment and best estimate as to the ultimate outcome of any potential tax audits. Actual tax audit results could vary from these estimates.

 

F-12


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Foreign Currency Translation

 

We translate the results of operations of our foreign subsidiaries using average exchange rates during each period, whereas balance sheet accounts are translated using exchange rates at the end of each period. Balance sheet currency translation adjustments are recorded in OCI. Net currency transaction gains and losses included in other operating expenses were pre-tax gains (losses) of $(22), $44, $21, and $27$21 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, and 2002, respectively.

F-12


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted the fair value measurement provisions of FASB Statement No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“FAS 123”). In years prior to 2003, we used the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). Under APB 25, we did not have to recognize compensation expense for our stock option grants and our discounted stock purchase plan, however we did recognize compensation expense for our management incentive awards and certain other stock awards (see Note 11 for a description of these plans).

 

Under the provisions of FASB Statement No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure,” we have elected to adopt the measurement provisions of FAS 123 using the prospective method. Under this approach, all stock-based compensation granted subsequent to January 1, 2003 will be expensed to compensation and benefits over the vesting period based on the fair value at the date the stock-based compensation is granted. Stock compensation awards granted to date include stock options, management incentive awards, restricted performance units, and employer matching contributions (in shares of UPS stock) for a defined contribution benefit plan. The adoption of the measurement provisions of FAS 123 reduced 2005, 2004, and 2003 net income by $52 million ($0.05 per diluted share), $35 million ($0.03 per diluted share), and $20 million ($0.02 per diluted share), respectively.

 

The following provides pro forma information as to the impact on net income and earnings per share if we had used the fair value measurement provisions of FAS 123 to account for all stock-based compensation awards granted prior to January 1, 2003 (in millions, except per share amounts).

 

   2004

  2003

  2002

 

Net income

  $3,333  $2,898  $3,182 

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in net income, net of tax effects

   563   456   391 

Less: Total pro forma stock-based employee compensation expensse, net of tax effects

   (588)  (507)  (459)
   


 


 


Pro forma net income

  $3,308  $2,847  $3,114 
   


 


 


Basic earnings per share

             

As reported

  $2.95  $2.57  $2.84 

Pro forma

  $2.93  $2.52  $2.78 

Diluted earnings per share

             

As reported

  $2.93  $2.55  $2.81 

Pro forma

  $2.91  $2.50  $2.75 

F-13


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   2005

  2004

  2003

 

Net income

  $3,870  $3,333  $2,898 

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in net income, net of tax effects

   157   563   456 

Less: Total pro forma stock-based employee compensation expense, net of tax effects

   (165)  (588)  (507)
   


 


 


Pro forma net income

  $3,862  $3,308  $2,847 
   


 


 


Basic earnings per share

             

As reported

  $3.48  $2.95  $2.57 

Pro forma

  $3.47  $2.93  $2.52 

Diluted earnings per share

             

As reported

  $3.47  $2.93  $2.55 

Pro forma

  $3.46  $2.91  $2.50 

 

The fair value of each option grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Compensation cost is also measured for the fair value of employees’ purchase rights under our discounted stock purchase plan using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted-average assumptions used, by year, and the calculated weighted average fair value of options and employees’ purchase rights granted, are as follows:

 

  2004

 2003

 2002

   2005

 2004

 2003

 

Stock options:

      

Expected dividend yield

   1.50%  1.22%  1.10%   1.60%  1.50%  1.22%

Risk-free interest rate

   4.31%  3.70%  4.67%   4.18%  4.31%  3.70%

Expected life in years

   7   8   5    7   7   8 

Expected volatility

   15.69%  19.55%  20.24%   18.21%  15.69%  19.55%

Weighted average fair value of options granted

  $16.24  $17.02  $21.27   $17.33  $16.24  $17.02 

Discounted stock purchase plan:

   

Expected dividend yield

   1.42%  1.12%  1.10%

Risk-free interest rate

   1.18%  1.06%  1.70%

Expected life in years

   0.25   0.25   0.25 

Expected volatility

   16.83%  19.79%  20.45%

Weighted average fair value of purchase rights*

  $9.56  $8.53  $8.20 

F-13


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   2005

  2004

  2003

 

Discounted stock purchase plan:

             

Expected dividend yield

   1.62%  1.42%  1.12%

Risk-free interest rate

   2.84%  1.18%  1.06%

Expected life in years

   0.25   0.25   0.25 

Expected volatility

   15.46%  16.83%  19.79%

Weighted average fair value of purchase rights*

  $9.46  $9.56  $8.53 

*Includes the 10% discount from the market price (see Note 11).

Expected volatilities are based on the historical returns on our stock and, due to our limited history of being a publicly-traded company, an index of peer companies. The expected dividend yield is based on the recent historical dividend yields for our stock, taking into account changes in dividend policy. The risk-free interest rate is based on the term structure of interest rates at the time of the option grant. The expected life represents an estimate of the period of time options are expected to remain outstanding.

 

Derivative Instruments

 

Derivative instruments are accounted for in accordance with FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 133”), as amended, which requires all financial derivative instruments to be recorded on our balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives not designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. If a derivative is designated as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in its fair value that are considered to be effective, as defined, either offset the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through income, or are recorded in OCI until the hedged item is recorded in income. Any portion of a change in a derivative’s fair value that is considered to be ineffective, or is excluded from the measurement of effectiveness, is recorded immediately in income.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“FAS 123R”123(R)”), which replaces FAS 123 and supercedes APB 25. FAS 123R123(R) requires all share-based paymentsawards to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statementsmeasured based on their fair values and expensed over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (the vesting period). We had previously adopted the fair value recognition provisions of the original FAS 123, prospectively for all new stock compensation awards granted to employees subsequent to January 1, 2003. FAS 123(R) was effective beginning with the first interim or annual period after June 15, 2005, with early adoption encouraged. We will adopt2005; the SEC deferred the effective date, and as a result, we adopted FAS 123R in the third quarter of 2005, using the prospective method of adoption. The prospective method requires123(R) on January 1, 2006. On that compensation expense be recorded for alldate, there were no unvested stock options and restrictedor other forms of employee stock compensation issued prior to January 1, 2003.

We issue employee share-based awards, under our Incentive Compensation Plan, that are subject to specific vesting conditions; generally, the awards cliff vest or vest ratably over a five year period, “the nominal vesting period,” or at the beginningdate the employee retires (as defined by the plan), if earlier. For awards that specify an employee vests in the award upon retirement, we account for the awards using the nominal vesting period approach. Under this approach, we record compensation expense over the nominal vesting period. If the employee retires before the end of the first quarternominal vesting period, any remaining unrecognized compensation expense is recorded at the date of retirement.

Upon our adoption of FAS 123R. There123(R), we will revise our approach to apply the non-substantive vesting period approach to all new share-based compensation awards. Under this approach, compensation cost will be no impact upon adoption, as we will already be expensing all unvested option and restricted stock awards.

In December 2004,recognized immediately for awards granted to retirement-eligible employees, or over the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance forperiod from the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004” (“FSP 109-2”). FSP 109-2 provides guidance under FAS 109 with respect to recording the potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Jobs Act”) on enterprises’ income tax expense and deferred tax liability. The Jobs Act was enacted on October 22, 2004. FSP 109-2 states that angrant

 

F-14


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

enterprisedate to the date retirement eligibility is allowed time beyondachieved, if that is expected to occur during the financial reportingnominal vesting period. We will continue to apply the nominal vesting period of enactmentapproach for any awards granted prior to evaluateJanuary 1, 2006, and for the effectremaining portion of the Jobs Act on its planthen unvested outstanding awards.

If we had accounted for reinvestment or repatriation of foreignall share-based compensation awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 under the non-substantive vesting period approach, the impact to our net income and earnings per share would have been immaterial for purposes of applying FAS 109. We have not yet completed our evaluationall prior periods. The adoption of the impact of the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Act. Accordingly, as provided fornon-substantive vesting period approach is expected to reduce 2006 net income by an estimated $29 million, or $0.03 per diluted share, based on share-based awards that we are anticipating granting in FSP 109-2, we have not adjusted our income tax provision or deferred tax liabilities to reflect the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Act.2006.

 

The adoption of the following recent accounting pronouncements did not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition:

 

FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements47, “Accounting for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others—An Interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and Rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34”Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations”;

 

FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities—An Interpretation of ARB No. 51”;

FASB Statement No. 132(R) (revised 2003), “Employer’s Disclosures about Pensions and Other Post-Retirement Benefits—An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106”;

FASB Statement No. 146, “AccountingEITF 05-6, “Determining the Amortization Period for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”Leasehold Improvements”;

FASB Statement No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”;

 

FASB Statement No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity”; and

FSP 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003”.

 

Changes in Presentation

 

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

 

NOTE 2. MARKETABLE SECURITIES AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

 

The following is a summary of marketable securities and short-term investments at December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 (in millions):

 

  Cost

  

Unrealized

Gains


  

Unrealized

Losses


  

Estimated

Fair Value


  Cost

  

Unrealized

Gains


  

Unrealized

Losses


  

Estimated

Fair Value


2004            

2005

            

U.S. government & agency securities

  $269  $1  $1  $269  $400  $1  $3  $398

U.S. mortgage & asset-backed securities

   1,042   1   1   1,042   393   1   5   389

U.S. corporate securities

   446   1   1   446   425   —     4   421

U.S. state and local municipal securities

   1,098   —     —     1,098   70   —     —     70

Other debt securities

   2   —     —     2   2   —     —     2
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total debt securities

   2,857   3   3   2,857   1,290   2   12   1,280

Common equity securities

   63   14   —     77   42   19   —     61

Preferred equity securities

   1,546   —     22   1,524   331   —     —     331
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Current marketable securities & short-term investments

   1,663   21   12   1,672
  $4,466  $17  $25  $4,458  

  

  

  

Non-current common equity securities

   21   7   —     28
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total marketable securities & short-term investments

  $1,684  $28  $12  $1,700
  

  

  

  

 

F-15


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

  Cost

  

Unrealized

Gains


  

Unrealized

Losses


  

Estimated

Fair Value


  Cost

  

Unrealized

Gains


  

Unrealized

Losses


  

Estimated

Fair Value


2003            

2004

            

U.S. government & agency securities

  $151  $1  $—    $152  $269  $1  $1  $269

U.S. mortgage & asset-backed securities

   474   1   —     475   1,042   1   1   1,042

U.S. corporate securities

   192   2   1   193   446   1   1   446

U.S. state and local municipal securities

   561   —     —     561   1,098   —     —     1,098

Other debt securities

   4   —     1   3   2   —     —     2
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total debt securities

   1,382   4   2   1,384   2,857   3   3   2,857

Common equity securities

   66   29   —     95   63   14   —     77

Preferred equity securities

   1,418   —     9   1,409   1,546   —     22   1,524
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Current marketable securities & short-term investments

  $4,466  $17  $25  $4,458
  $2,866  $33  $11  $2,888  

  

  

  

Non-current common equity securities

   —     —     —     —  
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total marketable securities & short-term investments

  $4,466  $17  $25  $4,458
  

  

  

  

 

The gross realized gains on sales of marketable securities totaled $2, $7, $21, and $11$21 million in 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002,2003, respectively. The gross realized losses totaled $12, $5, $7, and $10$7 million in 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002,2003, respectively. Impairment losses recognized on marketable securities and short-term investments totaled $16, $0, $58, and $5$58 million during 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002,2003, respectively.

 

The following table presents the age of gross unrealized losses and fair value by investment category for all securities in a loss position as of December 31, 20042005 (in millions):

 

  Less Than 12 Months

  12 Months or More

  Total

  Less Than 12 Months

  12 Months or More

  Total

  

Fair

Value


  

Unrealized

Losses


  

Fair

Value


  

Unrealized

Losses


  

Fair

Value


  

Unrealized

Losses


  

Fair

Value


  

Unrealized

Losses


  

Fair

Value


  

Unrealized

Losses


  

Fair

Value


  

Unrealized

Losses


U.S. government & agency securities

  $189  $1  $5  $—    $194  $1  $270  $2  $41  $1  $311  $3

U.S. mortgage & asset-backed securities

   111   1   2   —     113   1   209   3   74   2   283   5

U.S. corporate securities

   197   1   22   —     219   1   245   3   92   1   337   4

U.S. state and local municipal securities

   —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —  

Other debt securities

   —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —  
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total debt securities

   497   3   29   —     526   3   724   8   207   4   931   12

Common equity securities

   —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —  

Preferred equity securities

   10   —     98   22   108   22   7   —     7   —     14   —  
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  $507  $3  $127  $22  $634  $25  $731  $8  $214  $4  $945  $12
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

The unrealized losses in the preferred equityU.S. government & agency securities, mortgage & asset-backed securities, and corporate securities relate to various fixed income securities, issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), and are primarily due to changes in market interest rates. Due to the periodic interest rate adjustment features on these securities, we do not consider these losses to be other-than-temporary. We have both the intent and ability to hold the securities contained in the previous table for a time necessary to recover the cost basis.

 

F-16


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of marketable securities and short-term investments at December 31, 2004,2005, by contractual maturity, are shown below (in millions). Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties.

 

  Cost

  

Estimated

Fair Value


  Cost

  

Estimated

Fair Value


Due in one year or less

  $37  $37  $122  $121

Due after one year through three years

   459   458   648   642

Due after three years through five years

   75   75   89   89

Due after five years

   2,286   2,287   431   428
  

  

  

  

   2,857   2,857   1,290   1,280

Equity securities

   1,609   1,601   394   420
  

  

  

  

  $4,466  $4,458  $1,684  $1,700
  

  

  

  

 

NOTE 3. FINANCE RECEIVABLES

 

The following is a summary of finance receivables at December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 (in millions):

 

  2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 

Commercial term loans

  $360  $438   $317  $360 

Investment in finance leases

   188   270    153   188 

Asset-based lending

   285   290    281   285 

Receivable factoring

   191   468    151   191 
  


 


  


 


Gross finance receivables

   1,024   1,466    902   1,024 

Less: Allowance for credit losses

   (25)  (52)   (20)  (25)
  


 


  


 


Balance at December 31

  $999  $1,414   $882  $999 
  


 


  


 


 

Outstanding receivable balances at December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 are net of unearned income of $35$34 and $48$35 million, respectively. When we “factor” (i.e., purchase) a customer invoice from a client, we record the customer receivable as an asset and also establish a liability for the funds due to the client, which is recorded in accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheet. The following is a reconciliation of receivable factoring balances at December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 (in millions):

 

  2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 

Customer receivable balances

  $191  $468   $151  $191 

Less: Amounts due to client

   (112)  (195)   (101)  (112)
  


 


  


 


Net funds employed

  $79  $273   $50  $79 
  


 


  


 


 

Non-earning finance receivables were $38$24 and $67$38 million at December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. The following is a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses on finance receivables (in millions):

 

  2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 

Balance at January 1

  $52  $38   $25  $52 

Provisions charged to operations

   14   39    11   14 

Charge-offs, net of recoveries

   (41)  (25)   (16)  (41)
  


 


  


 


Balance at December 31

  $25  $52   $20  $25 
  


 


  


 


 

F-17


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The carrying value of finance receivables at December 31, 2004,2005, by contractual maturity, is shown below (in millions). Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because some borrowers have the right to prepay these receivables without prepayment penalties.

 

  Carrying
Value


  Carrying
Value


Due in one year or less

  $530  $423

Due after one year through three years

   81   82

Due after three years through five years

   99   61

Due after five years

   314   336
  

  

  $1,024  $902
  

  

 

Based on interest rates for financial instruments with similar terms and maturities, the estimated fair value of finance receivables is approximately $883 and $991 million and $1.384 billion as of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. At December 31, 2004,2005, we had unfunded loan commitments totaling $344$416 million, consisting of standby letters of credit of $53$42 million and other unfunded lending commitments of $291$374 million.

 

NOTE 4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

 

Property, plant and equipment as of December 31 consists of the following (in millions):

 

  2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 

Vehicles

  $3,784  $3,486   $4,286  $3,784 

Aircraft (including aircraft under capitalized leases)

   11,590   10,897    12,289   11,590 

Land

   760   721    968   760 

Buildings

   2,164   2,083    2,404   2,164 

Leasehold improvements

   2,347   2,219    2,469   2,347 

Plant equipment

   4,641   4,410    4,982   4,641 

Technology equipment

   1,596   1,495    1,639   1,596 

Equipment under operating lease

   57   53    87   57 

Construction-in-progress

   539   450    433   539 
  


 


  


 


   27,478   25,814    29,557   27,478 

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (13,505)  (12,516)   (14,268)  (13,505)
  


 


  


 


  $13,973  $13,298   $15,289  $13,973 
  


 


  


 


 

NOTE 5. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

 

We sponsor various retirement and pension plans, including defined benefit and defined contribution plans which cover our employees worldwide. In the U.S. we maintain the following defined benefit pension plans (the “Plans”): UPS Retirement Plan, UPS Pension Plan, Retirement Plan for employees of Overnite Transportation Company, Pension Plan for Employees of Motor Cargo (a subsidiary of Overnite), and several non-qualified plans including the UPS Excess Coordinating Benefit Plan,Plan.

We also sponsor various retirement and pension plans covering certain of our non-U.S. employees. The majority of our non-U.S. obligations are for pension plans in Canada and the UPS Pension Plan.United Kingdom (including the Lynx acquisition in 2005). In addition, many of our non-U.S. employees are covered by government-sponsored retirement and pension plans. We are not directly responsible for providing benefits to participants of government-sponsored plans. In the pension benefits disclosures presented below, these non-U.S. plans are aggregated with our U.S. plans, as the non-U.S. plans we sponsor are not significant for disclosure purposes.

 

The UPS Retirement Plan is noncontributory and includes substantially all eligible employees of participating domestic subsidiaries who are not members of a collective bargaining unit. The Plan generally

F-18


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

provides for retirement benefits based on average compensation levels earned by employees prior to retirement. Benefits payable under this Plan are subject to maximum compensation limits and the annual benefit limits for a tax qualified defined benefit plan as prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service. Effective December 31, 2005, the qualified defined benefit plans covering Overnite and Motor Cargo employees were merged with the UPS Retirement Plan and UPS Pension Plan.

 

The UPS Excess Coordinating Benefit Plan is a non-qualified plan that provides benefits to participants in the UPS Retirement Plan for amounts that exceed the benefit limits described above.

F-18


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The UPS Pension Plan is noncontributory and includes certain eligible employees of participating domestic subsidiaries and members of collective bargaining units that elect to participate in the plan. The Plan provides for retirement benefits based on service credits earned by employees prior to retirement.

Our funding policy is consistent with relevant federal tax regulations. Accordingly, our contributions are deductible for federal income tax purposes. Because the UPS Excess Coordinating Benefit Plan is non-qualified for federal income tax purposes, Effective December 31, 2005, this plan is not funded.includes those participants included in the Overnite acquisition who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

 

We also sponsor postretirement medical plans in the U.S. that provide health care benefits to our retirees who meet certain eligibility requirements and who are not otherwise covered by multi-employer plans. Generally, this includes employees with at least 10 years of service who have reached age 55 and employees who are eligible for postretirement medical benefits from a Company-sponsored plan pursuant to collective bargaining agreements. We have the right to modify or terminate certain of these plans. In many cases, theseThese benefits have been provided to certain retirees on a noncontributory basis; however, in certainmany cases, retirees are required to contribute towardall or a portion of the total cost of the coverage.

 

Net Periodic Benefit ObligationsCost

Information about net periodic benefit cost for the pension and postretirement benefit plans is as follows (in millions):

   Pension Benefits

  

Postretirement

Medical Benefits


 
   2005

  2004

  2003

  2005

  2004

  2003

 

Net Periodic Cost:

                         

Service cost

  $388  $344  $282  $92  $91  $79 

Interest cost

   628   533   465   170   164   148 

Expected return on assets

   (935)  (809)  (669)  (38)  (34)  (29)

Amortization of:

                         

Transition obligation

   3   6   8   —     —     —   

Prior service cost

   38   37   37   (7)  —     1 

Actuarial (gain) loss

   72   121   28   31   30   15 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Net periodic benefit cost

  $194  $232  $151  $248  $251  $214 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Actuarial Assumptions

 

The following table below provides a reconciliation of the changes inweighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine the plans’net periodic benefit obligations as of September 30 (in millions):cost.

 

   Pension Benefits

  

Postretirement

Medical Benefits


 
   2004

  2003

  2004

  2003

 

Net benefit obligation at October 1, prior year

  $8,092  $6,670  $2,592  $2,149 

Service cost

   332   282   91   79 

Interest cost

   521   465   164   148 

Plan participants’ contributions

   —     —     9   6 

Plan amendments

   3   3   (115)  (22)

Acquired businesses

   —     —     46   —   

Actuarial (gain) loss

   290   876   36   337 

Gross benefits paid

   (201)  (204)  (129)  (105)
   


 


 


 


Net benefit obligation at September 30

  $9,037  $8,092  $2,694  $2,592 
   


 


 


 


Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:

                 

Discount rate

   6.25%  6.25%  6.25%  6.25%

Rate of annual increase in future compensation levels

   4.00%  4.00%  N/A   N/A 

The accumulated benefit obligation for our pension plans as of September 30, 2004 and 2003 was $8.113 and $7.325 billion, respectively. We use a measurement date of September 30 for our pension and postretirement benefit plans.

In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”) was enacted. The Act established a prescription drug benefit under Medicare, known as “Medicare Part D”, and a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. We believe that benefits provided to certain participants will be at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D, and, accordingly may be entitled to a subsidy.

In May 2004, the FASB issued FSP 106-2, which requires (a) that the effects of the federal subsidy be considered an actuarial gain and recognized in the same manner as other actuarial gains and losses and (b) certain

   Pension Benefits

  

Postretirement

Medical Benefits


 
       2005    

      2004    

      2003    

      2005    

      2004    

      2003    

 

Discount rate

  6.09% 6.24% 6.75% 6.25% 6.25% 6.75%

Rate of compensation increase

  3.98% 3.97% 4.00% N/A  N/A  N/A 

Expected return on assets

  8.94% 8.95% 9.21% 9.00% 9.00% 9.25%

 

F-19


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

disclosuresThe table below provides the weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations of our plans.

   Pension Benefits

  

Postretirement

Medical Benefits


 
       2005    

      2004    

      2005    

      2004    

 

Discount rate

  5.72% 6.09% 5.75% 6.25%

Rate of compensation increase

  4.00% 3.98% N/A  N/A 

Our pension and other postretirement benefit costs are calculated using various actuarial assumptions and methodologies as prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for employers that sponsor postretirementPensions” and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions.” These assumptions include discount rates, expected return on plan assets, health care cost trend rates, inflation, rate of compensation increases, mortality rates, and other factors. Actuarial assumptions are reviewed on an annual basis.

A discount rate is used to determine the present value of our future benefit obligations. For U.S. plans, that provide prescription drug benefits. Wethe discount rate is determined by matching the effectsexpected cash flows to a yield curve based on long-term, high quality fixed income debt instruments available as of the Act were not a significant event requiring an interim remeasurement under FAS 106. Consequently, as permitted by FSP 106-2,measurement date. For international plans, the discount rate is selected based on high quality fixed income indices available in the country in which the plan is domiciled. This assumption is updated every year for each plan.

An assumption for return on plan assets is used to determine the expected return on asset component of net periodic benefit cost for 2004 does not reflect the effectsfiscal year. This assumption for our U.S. plans was evaluated using input from third-party consultants and various pension plan asset managers, including their long-term projection of returns for each asset class and our target allocation. For our U.S. plans, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield is the foundation for all other asset class returns, and various risk premiums are added to determine the expected return for each allocation.

For plans outside the U.S., consideration is given to local market expectations of long-term returns. Strategic asset allocations are determined by country, based on the nature of liabilities and considering the demographic composition of the Act. The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) was remeasured as of September 30, 2004 to reflect the effects of the Act, which resulted in an immaterial reduction in the APBO and expected net employer benefit payments.plan participants.

 

Health care cost trends are used to project future postretirement benefits payable from our plans. Future postretirement medical benefit costs were forecasted assuming an initial annual increase of 9.0%8.5%, decreasing to 5.0% by the year 2009 and with consistent annual increases at those ultimate levels thereafter.

 

Assumed health care cost trends have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the U.S. postretirement medical plans. A one-percent change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects (in millions):

 

   1% Increase

  1% Decrease

 

Effect on postretirement benefit obligation

  $69  $(75)
   1% Increase

  1% Decrease

 

Effect on total of service cost and interest cost

  $7  $(6)

Effect on postretirement benefit obligation

  $88  $(58)

 

BecauseF-20


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Benefit Obligations and Funded Status

The following table provides a reconciliation of the UPS Excess Coordinating Plan is notchanges in the plans’ benefit obligations and funded status as of our measurement date on September 30 (in millions):

   Pension Benefits

  

Postretirement

Medical Benefits


 
   2005

  2004

  2005

  2004

 

Net benefit obligation at October 1, prior year

  $9,280  $8,287  $2,648  $2,592 

Service cost

   388   344   92   91 

Interest cost

   628   533   170   164 

Plan participants contributions

   1   1   10   9 

Plan amendments

   13   3   (21)  (115)

Acquired businesses

   1,476   —     119   —   

Actuarial (gain) loss

   1,260   299   58   36 

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   (16)  18   —     —   

Curtailments and settlements

   (6)  —     —     —   

Gross benefits paid

   (249)  (205)  (149)  (129)
   


 


 


 


Net benefit obligation at September 30

  $12,775  $9,280 ��$2,927  $2,648 
   


 


 


 


   Pension Benefits

  

Postretirement

Medical Benefits


 
   2005

  2004

  2005

  2004

 

Fair value of plan assets at September 30

  $13,209  $10,094  $509  $455 

Benefit obligation at September 30

   (12,775)  (9,280)  (2,927)  (2,648)
   


 


 


 


Funded status at September 30

   434   814   (2,418)  (2,193)

Amounts not yet recognized:

                 

Unrecognized net actuarial loss

   2,613   1,996   817   810 

Unrecognized prior service cost

   274   298   (118)  (104)

Unrecognized net transition obligation

   15   18   —     —   

Employer contributions

   8   6   15   17 
   


 


 


 


Net asset (liability) recorded at December 31

  $3,344  $3,132  $(1,704) $(1,470)
   


 


 


 


Prepaid pension cost

  $3,932  $3,222  $—    $—   

Accrued benefit cost

   (750)  (221)  (1,704)  (1,470)

Intangible asset

   13   4   —     —   

Accumulated other comprehensive income (pre-tax)

   149   127   —     —   
   


 


 


 


Net asset (liability) recorded at December 31

  $3,344  $3,132  $(1,704) $(1,470)
   


 


 


 


The accumulated benefit obligation for our pension plans as of September 30, 2005 and 2004 was $11.485 and $8.307 billion, respectively. In general, we use a measurement date of September 30 for our pension and postretirement benefit plans.

For our U.S. and international pension plans in which the Company hasaccumulated benefit obligation exceeds the assets, we have recorded an additionala minimum pension liability for this plan of $91$312 and $105$221 million at December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. This liability is included in the other credits and non-current liabilities portion ofaccrued pension costs, as detailed in Note 9. As of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, the Company has recorded an intangible asset of $4$13 and $5$4 million, respectively, representing the net unrecognized prior service cost for this plan.our unfunded plans. A total of $55$149 and $63$127 million at December 31, 2004 2005

F-21


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

and 2003,2004, respectively, were recorded as a reduction of other comprehensive income in shareowners’ equity (net of the tax effect of $32$54 and $37$46 million, respectively). The unfunded accumulated benefit obligation of the UPS Excess Coordinating Benefit Plan was $160 and $154 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Additionally, we maintain several non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans. As of December 31, 2004, we have recorded a prepaid pension asset of $5 million, an additional minimum pension liability of $30 million, and a $20 million (net of the tax effect of $11 million) reduction of other comprehensive income in shareowners’ equity. The impact of these non-U.S. plans is not material to our operating results or financial position.

 

Plan Assets

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the plans’pension and postretirement medical benefit plan assets as of September 30 (in millions):

 

  Pension Benefits

 

Postretirement

Medical Benefits


   Pension Benefits

 

Postretirement

Medical Benefits


 
  2004

 2003

 2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

     2005    

     2004    

 

Fair value of plan assets at October 1, prior year

  $7,823  $6,494  $409  $337   $10,094�� $7,933  $455  $409 

Actual return on plan assets

   1,140   1,143   51   47    1,499   1,139   62   51 

Employer contributions

   1,200   390   115   124    864   1,216   131   115 

Plan participants’ contributions

   —     —     9   6    1   1   10   9 

Acquired businesses

   1,012   —     —     —   

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   (7)  10   —     —   

Settlements

   (5)  —     —     —   

Gross benefits paid

   (201)  (204)  (129)  (105)   (249)  (205)  (149)  (129)
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Fair value of plan assets at September 30

  $9,962  $7,823  $455  $409   $13,209  $10,094  $509  $455 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


 

Employer contributions and benefits paid under the pension plans include $6 million$9 and $5$8 million paid from employer assets in 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. Employer contributions and benefits paid (net of

F-20


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

participant contributions) under the postretirement medical benefit plans include $57$69 and $45$57 million paid from employer assets in 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively.

 

The asset allocation for our U.S. pension and other postretirement plans as of September 30, 20042005 and 20032004 and the target allocation for 2005,2006, by asset category, are as follows:

 

  

Weighted Average

Target Allocation

2005


  Percentage of
Plan Assets at
September 30,


   

Weighted Average

Target Allocation

2006


  Percentage of
Plan Assets at
September 30,


 
  2004

 2003

    2005

 2004

 

Equity securities

  55% - 65%  60.6% 60.2%  55% - 65%  62.1% 60.6%

Fixed income securities

  20% - 30%  28.0% 28.5%  20% - 30%  25.9% 28.0%

Real estate / other

  10% - 15%  11.4% 11.3%  10% - 15%  12.0% 11.4%
     

 

     

 

Total

     100.0% 100.0%     100.0% 100.0%

 

Equity securities include UPS Class A shares of common stock in the amounts of $466 (4.5%$423 (3.4% of total plan assets) and $392$466 million (4.8%(4.5% of total plan assets), as of September 30, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively.

 

The UPSapplicable benefit plan committees establish investment guidelines and strategies, and regularly monitor the performance of the funds and portfolio managers. Our investment strategy with respect to pension assets is to invest the assets in accordance with ERISAapplicable laws and fiduciary standards.regulations. The long-term primary objectives for our pension assets are to (1) provide for a reasonable amount of long-term growth of capital, without undue exposure to risk; and protect the assets from erosion of purchasing power, and (2) provide investment results that meet or exceed the plans’ actuarially assumed long-term rate of return.

 

Funded Status

The funded status of the plans, reconciled to the amounts on the balance sheet, is as follows (in millions):

   Pension Benefits

  

Postretirement

Medical Benefits


 
   2004

  2003

  2004

  2003

 

Fair value of plan assets at September 30

  $9,962  $7,823  $455  $409 

Benefit Obligation at September 30

   (9,037)  (8,092)  (2,694)  (2,592)
   


 


 


 


Funded status at September 30

   925   (269)  (2,239)  (2,183)

Amounts not yet recognized:

                 

Unrecognized net actuarial loss

   1,918   2,085   810   820 

Unrecognized prior service cost

   297   331   (104)  11 

Unrecognized net transition obligation

   18   23   —     —   

Employer contributions

   2   752   17   17 
   


 


 


 


Net asset (liability) recorded at December 31

  $3,160  $2,922  $(1,516) $(1,335)
   


 


 


 


Prepaid pension cost

  $3,227  $2,970  $—    $—   

Accrued benefit cost

   (188)  (153)  (1,516)  (1,335)

Intangible asset

   4   5   —     —   

Accumulated other comprehensive income (pre-tax)

   117   100   —     —   
   


 


 


 


Net asset (liability) recorded at December 31

  $3,160  $2,922  $(1,516) $(1,335)
   


 


 


 


F-21F-22


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

At September 30, 20042005 and 2003,2004, the projected benefit obligation, the accumulated benefit obligation, and the fair value of plan assets for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets and for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets were as follows (in millions):

 

  

    Projected Benefit Obligation    
Exceeds the Fair Value of

Plan Assets


  

    Accumulated Benefit Obligation    

Exceeds the Fair Value of

Plan Assets


  

Projected Benefit Obligation 
Exceeds the Fair Value of

Plan Assets


  

Accumulated Benefit Obligation

Exceeds the Fair Value of

Plan Assets


  2004

  2003

  2004

  2003

          2005        

          2004        

          2005        

          2004        

As of September 30

                        

Projected benefit obligation

  $200  $6,772  $200  $178  $705  $438  $705  $433

Accumulated benefit obligation

  $160  $6,004  $160  $154   578  ��354   578   350

Fair value of plan assets

  $—    $6,479  $—    $—     266   132   266   129

 

The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation exceeds plan assets for all of our other postretirement benefit plans.

 

Expected Cash Flows

 

Information about expected cash flows for the pension and postretirement benefit plans is as follows (in millions):

 

  Pension Benefits

  Other Benefits

  Pension Benefits

  

Postretirement

Medical Benefits


Employer Contributions:

            

2005 (expected) to plan trusts

  $723  $62

2005 (expected) to plan participants

   7   56

2006 (expected) to plan trusts

  $763  $65

2006 (expected) to plan participants

   30   65

Expected Benefit Payments:

            

2005

  $214  $126

2006

   257   133  $322  $132

2007

   266   141   338   140

2008

   303   150   376   149

2009

   332   158   410   160

2010 - 2014

   2,363   975

2010

   454   170

2011 - 2015

   3,136   1,000

 

Expected benefit payments for pensions will be primarily paid from plan trusts. Expected benefit payments for postretirement benefits will be paid from plan trusts and corporate assets.

F-22


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

Information about net periodic benefit cost Our funding policy for the pension and postretirement benefitU.S. plans is as follows (in millions):

   Pension Benefits

  

Postretirement

Medical Benefits


 
   2004

  2003

  2002

  2004

  2003

  2002

 

Net Periodic Cost:

                         

Service cost

  $332  $282  $217  $91  $79  $63 

Interest cost

   521   465   413   164   148   134 

Expected return on assets

   (800)  (669)  (654)  (34)  (29)  (33)

Amortization of:

                         

Transition obligation

   6   8   8   —     —     —   

Prior service cost

   37   37   30   —     1   (1)

Actuarial (gain) loss

   119   28   4   30   15   4 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Net periodic benefit cost (benefit)

  $215  $151  $18  $251  $214  $167 
   


 


 


 


 


 


Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net cost:

                         

Discount rate

   6.25%  6.75%  7.50%  6.25%  6.75%  7.50%

Rate of compensation increase

   4.00%  4.00%  4.00%  N/A   N/A   N/A 

Expected return on plan assets

   8.96%  9.21%  9.42%  9.00%  9.25%  9.50%

The expected return on plan assets assumption was developed using various market assumptions in combination with the plans’ asset allocations and active investment management. These assumptions and allocations were evaluated using input from a third-party consultant and various pension plan asset managers, including their review of asset class return expectations and long-term inflation assumptions. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield is the foundation for all other market assumptions, and various risk premiumsto contribute amounts annually that are addedat least equal to determine the expected return for each allocation. As of our September 30, 2004 measurement date, it was projected that the funds could achieve an 8.96% net return over time, using the plans’ asset allocations and active management strategy.

Assumed health care cost trends have a significant effect on the amounts reported forrequired by applicable laws and regulations, or to directly fund payments to plan participants, as applicable. International plans will be funded in accordance with local regulations. Additional discretionary contributions will be made when deemed appropriate to meet the postretirement medicallong-term obligations of the plans. A one-percent change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects (in millions):

   1% Increase

  1% Decrease

 

Effect on total of service cost and interest cost

  $5  $(5)

 

Other Plans

 

We also contribute to several multi-employer pension plans for which the previous disclosure information is not determinable. Amounts charged to operations for pension contributions to these multi-employer plans were $1.289, $1.163, $1.066, and $1.028$1.066 billion during 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002,2003, respectively.

 

We also contribute to several multi-employer health and welfare plans that cover both active and retired employees for which the previous disclosure information is not determinable. Amounts charged to operations for contributions to multi-employer health and welfare plans were $798, $761, $691, and $604$691 million during 2005, 2004, and 2003, and 2002, respectively.

F-23


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

We also sponsor a defined contribution plan for all employees not covered under collective bargaining agreements. The Company matches, in shares of UPS common stock, a portion of the participating employees’ contributions. Matching contributions charged to expense were $105, $94, $87, and $79$87 million for 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002,2003, respectively.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2002, our vacation policy for non-union employees was amendedF-23


Index to require that vacation pay be earned ratably throughout the year. Previously, an employee became vested in the full year of vacation pay at the beginning of each year. As a result of this policy change, a credit to compensation and benefits of $197 million was taken in the fourth quarter to reduce the vacation pay liability as of December 31, 2002.Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

NOTE 6. GOODWILL, INTANGIBLES, AND OTHER ASSETS

 

The following table indicates the allocation of goodwill by reportable segment (in millions):

 

  

U.S. Domestic

Package


  

International

Package


 Non-Package

  Consolidated

December 31, 2002 balance

  $—    $102  $968  $1,070

Acquired

   —     —     30   30

Impaired

   —     —     —     —  

Currency / Other

   —     (2)  75   73
  

  


 

  

  

U.S. Domestic

Package


  

International

Package


  Supply Chain
& Freight


 Consolidated

 

December 31, 2003 balance

   —     100   1,073   1,173  $—    $100  $1,073  $1,173 

Acquired

   —     41   38   79   —     41   38   79 

Impaired

   —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Currency / Other

   —     —     3   3   —     —     3   3 
  

  


 

  

  

  

  


 


December 31, 2004 balance

  $—    $141  $1,114  $1,255   —     141   1,114   1,255 

Acquired

   —     145   1,171   1,316 

Impaired

   —     —     —     —   

Currency / Other

   —     4   (26)  (22)
  

  


 

  

  

  

  


 


December 31, 2005 balance

  $—    $290  $2,259  $2,549 
  

  

  


 


 

The goodwill acquired in the non-packageInternational Package segment during 20042005 resulted primarily from the purchase of Lynx Express Ltd. in the United Kingdom, Messenger Service Stolica S.A. in Poland, and the express operations of Sinotrans Air Transportation Development Co. Ltd. in China. The goodwill acquired in the Supply Chain & Freight segment during 2005 resulted primarily from the purchase of Overnite Corp., as well as the restructuring costs incurred in exiting certain activities from the Menlo Worldwide Forwarding. The purchase price allocation for this acquisition was not complete as of December 31, 2004, therefore we anticipate that future purchase price adjustments may change the amount allocated to goodwill.Forwarding operations acquired previously. The goodwill acquired in the International packagePackage segment during 2004 resulted from the purchase of the remaining minority interest in UPS Yamato Express Co. (See, while the goodwill acquired in the Supply Chain & Freight segment in 2004 resulted primarily from the purchase of Menlo Worldwide Forwarding. The currency/other balance includes escrow reimbursements from acquisitions completed previously. See Note 7 for further discussion of these acquisitions). The currency/other balance in the Non-Package segment includes escrow reimbursements and the resolution of other pre-acquisition contingencies from acquisitions completed prior to 2004.business acquisition transactions.

 

The following is a summary of intangible assets at December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 (in millions):

 

 

Trademarks,

Licenses, Patents,

and Other


 

Franchise

Rights


 

Capitalized

Software


 

Intangible

Pension

Asset


 

Total

Intangible

Assets


 

December 31, 2005:

 

Gross carrying amount

 $139  $108  $1,391  $13 $1,651 

Accumulated amortization

  (31)  (23)  (913)  —    (967)
 


 


 


 

 


Net carrying value

 $108  $85  $478  $13 $684 
 


 


 


 

 


Weighted-average amortization period (in years)

  9.6   20.0   3.1   N/A  4.8 
  

Trademarks,

Licenses, Patents,

and Other


 

Franchise

Rights


 

Capitalized

Software


 

Intangible

Pension

Asset


  

Total

Intangible

Assets


 

December 31, 2004:

       

Gross carrying amount

  $29  $97  $1,249  $4  $1,379  $29  $97  $1,249  $4 $1,379 

Accumulated amortization

   (16)  (18)  (676)  —     (710)  (16)  (18)  (676)  —    (710)
  


 


 


 

  


 


 


 


 

 


Net carrying value

  $13  $79  $573  $4  $669  $13  $79  $573  $4 $669 
  


 


 


 

  


 


 


 


 

 


December 31, 2003:

      

Gross carrying amount

  $30  $88  $1,101  $5  $1,224 

Accumulated amortization

   (10)  (13)  (491)  —     (514)
  


 


 


 

  


Net carrying value

  $20  $75  $610  $5  $710 
  


 


 


 

  


Amortization of intangible assets was $255, $221, and $196 million during 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Expected amortization of finite-lived intangible assets recorded as of December 31, 2005 for the next five years is as follows (in millions): 2006—$179; 2007—$180; 2008—$179; 2009—$23; 2010—$23. Amortization expense in future periods will be affected by business acquisitions, software development, and other factors.

 

F-24


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Amortization of intangible assets was $221, $196, and $129 million during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Expected amortization of finite-lived intangible assets recorded as of December 31, 2004 for the next five years is as follows (in millions): 2005—$198; 2006—$198; 2007—$198; 2008—$12; 2009—$11. Amortization expense in future periods will be affected by business acquisitions, software development, and other factors.

Other assets as of December 31 consist of the following (in millions):

 

  2004

  2003

  2005

  2004

Non-current finance receivables, net of allowance for credit losses

  $475  $574  $471  $475

Other non-current assets

   889   1,098   1,294   889
  

  

  

  

  $1,364  $1,672  $1,765  $1,364
  

  

  

  

 

NOTE 7. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

 

We regularly explore opportunities to make acquisitions that would enhance our package delivery business and our various non-package businesses. During the three years ended December 31, 2004,2005, we completed several acquisitions, including both domestic and international transactions, which were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. In connection with the foregoingthese transactions, we paid cash (net of cash acquired) in the aggregate amount of $1.488 billion, $238 $30,million, and $14$30 million in 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002,2003, respectively. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented for any of the acquisitions because the effects of these transactions were not material on either an individual or aggregate basis. The results of operations of each acquired company are included in our statements of consolidated income from the date of acquisition. The purchase price allocations of acquired companies can be modified up to one year after the date of acquisition, however we generally expect such adjustments to the purchase price allocations to be immaterial.acquisition.

 

During the second quarter of 2003, we sold our Mail Technologies business unit in a transaction that increased net income by $14 million, or $0.01 per diluted share. The gain consisted of a pre-tax loss of $24 million recorded in other operating expenses within the non-packageSupply Chain & Freight segment, and a tax benefit of $38 million recognized in conjunction with the sale. The tax benefit exceeded the pre-tax loss from this sale primarily because thea goodwill impairment charge we previously recorded for the Mail Technologies business unit was not deductible for income tax purposes. Consequently, our tax basis was greater than our book basis, thus producing the tax benefit described above. The operating results of the Mail Technologies unit were previously included in the Supply Chain & Freight segment, and were not material to our operating results in any of the periods presented.

 

During the third quarter of 2003, we sold our Aviation Technologies business unit and recognized a pre-tax gain of $24 million ($15 million after-tax, or $0.01 per diluted share), which was recorded in other operating expenses within the non-packageU.S. Domestic Package segment. The operating results of both the Mail Technologies unit and the Aviation Technologies unit were previously included in our non-packagethe U.S. Domestic Package segment, and were not material to our consolidated operating results in any of the periods presented.

 

In March 2004, we acquired the remaining 49% minority interest in UPS Yamato Express Co., which was previously a joint venture with Yamato Transport Co. in Japan, for $65 million in cash. UPS Yamato Express provides express package delivery services in Japan. Upon the close of the acquisition, UPS Yamato Express became a wholly-owned subsidiary of UPS.UPS, and is included in our International Package reporting segment. The acquisition had no material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

In December 2004, we acquired the Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, unitInc. from CNF Inc. for $150 million in cash (net of cash acquired) plus the assumption of $110 million in par valueprincipal amount of debt and capital lease obligations. Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, Inc. is a global freight forwarder that provides a full suite of heavy air freight forwarding services, ocean services and international trade management, including customs brokerage. The acquisition had no material effect onMenlo Worldwide Forwarding, Inc. is now included as part of our results of operations in 2004.Supply Chain & Freight reporting segment.

 

F-25


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In December 2004, we agreed with Sinotrans Air Transportation Development Co., Ltd. (“Sinotrans”) to acquire direct control of the international express operations in 23 cities within China, and to purchase Sintotrans’ interest in our current joint venture in China. The agreement will result in the payment of $121 million to Sinotrans in 2005 and 2006. As of December 31, 2005, we have paid cash of $71 million, and have taken direct control of operations in all 23 locations. The operations being acquired are reported within our International Package reporting segment from the dates of acquisition.

In May 2005, we acquired Messenger Service Stolica S.A. (“Stolica”), one of the leading parcel and express delivery companies in Poland. Stolica’s operating results are included in our International Package reporting segment from the date of acquisition.

In August 2005, we acquired Overnite Corporation (“Overnite”) for approximately $1.225 billion in cash. Overnite offers a variety of less-than-truckload and truckload services to more than 60,000 customers in North America. The operating results of Overnite, which is now known as UPS Freight, are included in our Supply Chain and Freight reporting segment from the date of acquisition.

In September 2005, we acquired Lynx Express Ltd. (“Lynx”) for approximately $68 million in cash. Lynx Express was one of the largest independent parcel carriers in the United Kingdom. Lynx also offers customers a broad suite of logistics and spare parts logistics services. The operating results of Lynx are included in our International Package reporting segment from the date of acquisition.

 

We are in the process of finalizing the independent appraisals for certain assets and liabilities to assist management in allocating the Menlo purchase price of Lynx and Overnite to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed. This may result in adjustments to the carrying values of Menlo’sLynx’s and Overnite’s recorded assets and liabilities, including the amount of any residual value allocated to goodwill. We are also completing our analysis of integration plans that may result in additional purchase price adjustments. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price included in the current period balance sheet is based on the current best estimates of management and is subject to revision based on final determination of fair values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities. We anticipate the valuations and other studies will be completed prior to the anniversary datedates of the acquisition.

In February 2005, we announced our intention to transfer operations currently taking place at the Menlo facility in Dayton, Ohio to other UPS facilities over approximately 12 to 18 months. This action is being taken to remove redundancies between the Menlo and existing UPS transportation networks, and thus provide efficiencies and better leverage the current UPS facilities in the movement of air freight. We are currently evaluating our plans for this facility, including potential alternate uses or closure. As a result, we anticipate possibly incurring costs related to employee severance, lease terminations, fixed asset impairments, and related items. Depending upon the nature of these costs, some of these items could result in charges to expense, while other items could result in adjustments to the purchase price allocation. We are in process of finalizing our plan for this facility, and therefore the purchase price allocation does not reflect liability accruals or fair value adjustments that may result from this decision.acquisitions.

 

The preliminary allocation of the total purchase price of Menlothe 2005 acquisitions discussed above (preliminary allocation in the case of Lynx and Overnite) and other smaller acquisitions, as well as the 2005 purchase price adjustments related to acquisitions closed in 2004, resulted in the following condensed balance sheet of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of December 31, 2004 (in millions):

 

  Assets

    Liabilities

Cash and cash equivalents

 $47  Accounts payable $28

Accounts receivable

  466  Accrued wages and withholdings  104

Other current assets

  21  Other current liabilities  161

Property, plant, and equipment

  141  Long-term debt  124

Goodwill and intangible assets

  26  

Deferred Taxes, Credits and Other Liabilities

  45

Other assets

  4  

Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation

  46
  

    

  $705    $508
  

    

In December 2004, we announced an agreement with Sinotrans to acquire direct control of the international express operations in 23 cities within China, and to purchase Sinotrans’ interest in our current joint venture in China. The agreement requires a payment of $100 million to Sinotrans in 2005, which can be increased or decreased based on certain contingent factors. The acquisition will be completed in stages throughout 2005. In February 2005, we took direct control of operations in five locations, while the additional 18 locations will be acquired by December 2005. The operations being acquired will be reported within our International package reporting segment.

In February 2005, we announced an agreement to acquire Messenger Service Stolica S.A., one of the leading parcel and express delivery companies in Poland. Stolica offers customers a full suite of domestic delivery services, and had 2004 revenue of approximately $64 million. Upon completion of the transaction, which is expected in the second quarter of 2005, Stolica will be included in our International package reporting segment.

  Assets

    Liabilities

Cash and cash equivalents

 $25  Accounts payable $77

Accounts receivable

  246  Accrued wages and withholdings  41

Other current assets

  57  Other current liabilities  254

Property, plant, and equipment

  701  Current maturities of long-term debt  48

Goodwill

  1,316  

Deferred taxes, credits and other liabilities

  338

Intangible assets

  119  Long-term debt  78

Other assets

  4  

Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation

  119
  

    

  $2,468    $955
  

    

 

F-26


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

NOTE 8. LONG-TERM DEBT AND COMMITMENTS

 

Long-term debt, as of December 31, consists of the following (in millions):

 

  2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 

8.38% debentures, due April 1, 2020 (i)

  $463  $444   $457  $463 

8.38% debentures, due April 1, 2030 (i)

   276   276    293   276 

Commercial paper (ii)

   1,015   544    739   1,015 

Industrial development bonds, Philadelphia Airport facilities, due December 1, 2015 (iii)

   100   100    100   100 

Special facilities revenue bonds, Louisville Airport facilities, due January 1, 2029 (iv)

   149   149    149   149 

Floating rate senior notes (v)

   441   441    441   441 

Capitalized lease obligations (vi)

   401   451    278   401 

UPS Notes (vii)

   393   419    377   393 

5.50% Pound Sterling notes, due February 12, 2031

   961   887    863   961 

4.50% Singapore Dollar notes, due November 11, 2004

   —     59 

Special facilities revenue bonds, Dayton, OH facilities (viii)

   121   —      119   121 

Installment notes, mortgages, and bonds at various rates

   128   53    164   128 
  


 


  


 


   4,448   3,823    3,980   4,448 

Less current maturities

   (1,187)  (674)   (821)  (1,187)
  


 


  


 


  $3,261  $3,149   $3,159  $3,261 
  


 


  


 



(i)On January 22, 1998, we exchanged $276 million of an original $700 million in debentures for new debentures of equal principal with a maturity of April 1, 2030. The new debentures have the same interest rate as the 8.38% debentures due 2020 until April 1, 2020, and, thereafter, the interest rate will be 7.62% for the final 10 years. The 2030 debentures are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at any time. The redemption price is equal to the greater of 100% of the principal amount and accrued interest or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption at a benchmark treasury yield plus five basis points plus accrued interest. The remaining $424 million of 2020 debentures are not subject to redemption prior to maturity. Interest is payable semiannually on the first of April and October for both debentures and neither debenture is subject to sinking fund requirements. Portions of the fixed obligations associated with the debentures were swapped to floating rates during 2004 and 2005, based on six month LIBOR plus a spread. Including the effect of the swaps, the average interest rate paid on the debentures for 2005 and 2004 was 7.39% and 7.49%, respectively.
(ii)The weighted average interest rate on the commercial paper outstanding as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, was 4.01% and 2003, was 2.10% and 0.96%, respectively. At December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, the entire commercial paper balance has been classified as a current liability. The amount of commercial paper outstanding in 20052006 is expected to fluctuate. We are authorized to borrow up to $7.0 billion under the two U.S. commercial paper programs we maintain as of December 31, 2004.2005. We also maintain a European commercial paper program under which we are authorized to borrow up to €1.0 billion in a variety of currencies, however no amounts were outstanding under this program as of December 31, 2005.
(iii)The industrial development bonds bear interest at a daily variable rate. The average interest rates for 2005 and 2004 were 2.21% and 2003 were 1.08% and 0.89%, respectively.
(iv)The special facilities revenue bonds bear interest at a daily variable rate. The average interest rates for 2005 and 2004 were 2.41% and 2003 were 1.20% and 1.02%, respectively.
(v)The floating rate senior notes bear interest at one-month LIBOR less 45 basis points. The average interest rates for 2005 and 2004 were 2.87% and 2003 were 1.00% and 0.78%, respectively. These notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value, and putable by the note holders at various times after 10 years at a stated percentage of par value. The notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2053.

 

F-27


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

(vi)We have certain aircraft subject to capital leases. Some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased. The recorded value of aircraft subject to capital leases, which are included in Property, Plant and Equipment is as follows as of December 31 (in millions):

 

  2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 

Aircraft

  $1,795  $1,474   $2,054  $1,795 

Accumulated amortization

   (257)  (198)   (315)  (257)
  


 


  


 


  $1,538  $1,276   $1,739  $1,538 
  


 


  


 


 

(vii)The UPS Notes program involves the periodic issuance of fixed rate notes in $1,000 increments with various terms and maturities. At December 31, 2004,2005, the coupon rates of the outstanding notes varied between 3.00% and 6.20%, and the interest payments are made either monthly, quarterly or semiannually. The maturities of the notes range from 2006 to 2024. Substantially all of the fixed obligations associated with the notes were swapped to floating rates, based on different LIBOR indices plus or minus a spread. The average interest rate payable on the swaps for 2005 and 2004 was 3.09% and 2003 was 1.13% and 0.81%, respectively.
(viii)The special facilities revenue bonds were assumed in the acquisition of Menlo Worldwide Forwarding in December 2004 (see Note 7). The bonds have a par value of $108 million, $62 million of which is due in 2009, while the remaining $46 million is due in 2018. The bonds due in 2018 are callable beginning in 2008. The bonds due in 2018 bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.63%, while the bonds due in 2009 bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 6.05% to 6.20%. The bonds were recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition.

 

Based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for long-term debt with similar terms and maturities, the fair value of long-term debt, including current maturities, is approximately $4.708$4.327 and $4.109$4.708 billion as of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively.

 

We lease certain aircraft, facilities, equipment and vehicles under operating leases, which expire at various dates through 2054.2055. Certain of the leases contain escalation clauses and renewal or purchase options. Rent expense related to our operating leases was $742, $693, $678 and $685$678 million for 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, respectively.

 

The following table sets forth the aggregate minimum lease payments under capitalized and operating leases, the aggregate annual principal payments due under our long-term debt, and the aggregate amounts expected to be spent for purchase commitments (in millions).

 

Year


  

Capitalized

Leases


 

Operating

Leases


  

Debt

Principal


  

Purchase

Commitments


  

Capitalized

Leases


 

Operating

Leases


  

Debt

Principal


  

Purchase

Commitments


2005

  $97  $370  $1,110  $1,012

2006

   70   327   6   488  $64  $403  $774  $1,280

2007

   121   242   —     223   107   348   70   826

2008

   132   169   27   274   115   248   37   738

2009

   76   128   84   637   66   176   104   652

After 2009

   62   590   2,777   1,129

2010

   61   126   30   478

After 2010

   1   544   2,637   689
  


 

  

  

  


 

  

  

Total

   558  $1,826  $4,004  $3,763   414  $1,845  $3,652  $4,663
   

  

  

   

  

  

Less: imputed interest

   (157)          (136)       
  


         


       

Present value of minimum capitalized lease payments

   401           278        

Less: current portion

   (78)          (54)       
  


         


       

Long-term capitalized lease obligations

  $323          $224        
  


         


       

 

F-28


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

As of December 31, 2004,2005, we had outstanding letters of credit totaling approximately $2.161$2.095 billion issued in connection with routine business requirements.

 

We maintain two credit agreements with a consortium of banks that provide revolving credit facilities of $1.0 billion each, with one expiring April 21, 200520, 2006 and the other April 24, 2008.21, 2010. Interest on any amounts we borrow under these facilities would be charged at 90-day LIBOR plus 15 basis points. At December 31, 2004,2005, there were no outstanding borrowings under these facilities. In addition, we maintain an extendable commercial notes program under which we are authorized to borrow up to $500 million. No amounts were outstanding under this program at December 31, 2004.

 

We have a $2.0 billion shelf registration statement under which we may issue debt securities in the U.S. The debt may be denominated in a variety of currencies. There was approximately $126 million issued under this shelf registration statement at December 31, 2004.2005.

 

Our existing debt instruments and credit facilities do not have cross-default or ratings triggers, however these debt instruments and credit facilities do subject us to certain financial covenants. These covenants generally require us to maintain a $3.0 billion minimum net worth and limit the amount of secured indebtedness available to the company. These covenants are not considered material to the overall financial condition of the company, and all covenant tests were passed as of December 31, 2004.2005.

 

In December 2003, we redeemed our $300 million cash-settled convertible senior notes at a price of 102.703, and also terminated the swap transaction associated with the notes. The redemption amount paid was lower than the amount recorded for the fair value of the notes at the time of redemption, which, along with the cash settlement received on the swap, resulted in a $28 million pre-tax gain recorded in 2003 results.

 

NOTE 9. DEFERRED TAXES, CREDITS, AND OTHER LIABILITIES

 

Deferred taxes, credits, and other liabilities as of December 31 consist of the following (in millions):

 

  2004

  2003

  2005

  2004

Deferred income taxes (see Note 14)

  $3,274  $3,118  $3,425  $3,274

Insurance reserves

   1,136   923   1,354   1,136

Accrued pension cost (see Note 5)

   750   221

Other credits and non-current liabilities

   972   733   1,153   819
  

  

  

  

  $5,382  $4,774  $6,682  $5,450
  

  

  

  

 

NOTE 10. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

On August 9, 1999, the United States Tax Court held that we were liable for tax on income of Overseas Partners Ltd., a Bermuda company that had reinsured excess value (“EV”) insurance purchased by our customers beginning in 1984, and that we were liable for additional tax for the 1983 and 1984 tax years. The IRS took similar positions to those advanced in the Tax Court decision for tax years subsequent to 1984 through 1998. On June 20, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled in our favor and reversed the Tax Court decision. In January 2003, we and the IRS finalized settlement of all outstanding tax issues related to EV package insurance. Under the terms of settlement, we agreed to adjustments that will result in income tax due of approximately $562 million, additions to tax of $60 million and related interest. The amount due to the IRS as a result of the settlement is less than amounts we previously had accrued. As a result, we recorded income, before taxes, of $1.023 billion ($776 million after tax) during the fourth quarter of 2002. In the first quarter of 2004, we received a refund of $185 million pertaining to the 1983 and 1984 tax years.

F-29


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The IRS had proposed adjustments, unrelated to the EV package insurance matters discussed above, regarding the allowance of deductions and certain losses, the characterization of expenses as capital rather than ordinary, the treatment of certain income, and our entitlement to tax credits in the 1985 through 1998 tax years. In the third quarter of 2004, we settled all outstanding issues related to each of the tax years 1991 through 1998. In the fourth quarter of 2004, we received a refund of $425 million pertaining to the 1991 through 1998 tax years. We expect to receive the $371 million of refunds related to the 1985 through 1990 tax years within the next six months.

The IRS may take similar positions with respect to some of the non-EV package insurance matters for each of the years 1999 through 2004. If challenged, we expect that we will prevail on substantially all of these issues. Specifically, we believe that our practice of expensing the items that the IRS alleges should have been capitalized is consistent with the practices of other industry participants. We believe that the eventual resolution of these issues will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

We were named as a defendant in twenty-threetwenty-six now-dismissed lawsuits that sought to hold us liable for the collection of premiums for EVreinsured excess value (“EV”) insurance in connection with package shipments since 1984. Based on state and federal tort, contract and statutory claims, these cases generally claimed that we failed to remit collected EV premiums to an independent insurer; we failed to provide promised EV insurance; we acted as an insurer without complying with state insurance laws and regulations; and the price for EV insurance was excessive. These actions were all filed after thean August 9, 1999 U.S. Tax Court decision discussed above, whichthat the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit later reversed.

These twenty-threetwenty-six cases were consolidated for pre-trial purposes in a multi-district litigation proceeding (“MDL Proceeding”) in federal court in New York. In addition to the cases in which UPS was named as a defendant, there also was an action, Smith v. Mail Boxes Etc., against Mail Boxes Etc. and its franchisees relating to UPS EV insurance and related services purchased through Mail Boxes Etc. centers. That case also was consolidated into the MDL Proceeding.

 

In late 2003, the parties reached a global settlement resolving all claims and all cases in the MDL proceeding.Proceeding. In reaching the settlement, we and the other defendants expressly denied any and all liability. On July 30, 2004, the court issued an order granting final approval to the substantive terms of the settlement. No appeals were filed and the settlement became effective on September 8, 2004.

 

Pursuant to the settlement, UPS has provided qualifying settlement class members with vouchers toward the purchase of specified UPS services and willagreed to pay the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees the total amount of which still remainsand costs. Other defendants

F-29


Index to be determined by the court. Other defendants have Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

contributed to the costs of the litigation and settlement. The vouchers expired in July 2005 and the value of services for which vouchers were redeemed totaled $5 million. On November 2, 2005, the court issued an order awarding plaintiffs’ counsel fees and costs in the total amount of $3 million. The settlement including the attorneys’ fees. The ultimate cost to us of the proposed settlement will depend on a number of factors, including how many vouchers settlement class members actually use. We dodid not believe that this proposed settlement will have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

 

We are a defendant in a number of lawsuits filed in state and federal courts containing various class-action allegations under state wage-and-hour laws. In one of these cases, Marlo v. UPS, which has been certified as a class action in a California statefederal court, plaintiffs allege that they improperly were denied overtime, and seek penalties for missed meal and rest periods, and interest and attorneys’ fees. Plaintiffs purport to represent a class of 1,200 full-time supervisors.

 

We have denied any liability with respect to these claims and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in these cases. At this time, we have not determined the amount of any liability that may result from these matters or whether such liability, if any, would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

F-30


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

In addition, we are a defendant in various other lawsuits that arose in the normal course of business. We believe that the eventual resolution of these cases will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

 

We participate in a number of trustee-managed multi-employer pension and health and welfare plans for employees covered under collective bargaining agreements. Several factors could result in potential funding deficiencies which could cause us to make significantly higher future contributions to these plans, including unfavorable investment performance, changes in demographics, and increased benefits to participants. At this time, we are unable to determine the amount of additional future contributions, if any, or whether any material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows couldliquidity would result from our participation in these plans.

 

NOTE 11. CAPITAL STOCK AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 

Capital Stock

 

We maintain two classes of common stock, which are distinguished from each other by their respective voting rights. Class A shares of UPS are entitled to 10 votes per share, whereas Class B shares are entitled to one vote per share. Class A shares are primarily held by UPS employees and retirees, and these shares are fully convertible into Class B shares at any time. Class B shares are publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “UPS.”

 

Incentive Compensation Plan

 

The UPS Incentive Compensation Plan permits the grant of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares, performance units, and management incentive awards to eligible employees. The number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan is 112 million, with the number of shares reserved for issuance as restricted stock limited to 34 million. As of December 31, 2004,2005, management incentive awards, stock options, restricted performance units, and restricted performancestock units had been granted under the Incentive Compensation Plan.

 

Management Incentive Awards & Restricted Stock Units

 

Persons earning the right to receive management incentive awards are determined annually by the Compensation Committee of the UPS Board of Directors. This Committee, in its sole discretion, determines the total award, which consistsIn years prior to 2005, management incentive awards

F-30


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

consisted entirely of UPS Class A common stock giventhat was fully vested in any year.the year of grant. During the first quarter of 2005, we modified our management incentive awards program to provide that half of the annual management incentive award, with certain exceptions, be made in restricted stock units, which generally vest over a five-year period. The other half of the award granted in November 2005 was in the form of cash or unrestricted shares of Class A common stock and was fully vested at the time of grant. Amounts expensed for management incentive awards, including the restricted stock units, were $404, $738, $606, and $556$606 million during 2005, 2004, and 2003, and 2002, respectively.

Upon vesting, restricted stock units result in the issuance of the equivalent number of UPS Class A common shares after required tax withholdings. Except in the case of death, disability, or retirement, restricted stock units vest over a five year period with approximately 20% of the award vesting at each anniversary date of the grant. All restricted stock units granted are subject to earlier cancellation or vesting under certain conditions. Dividends earned on restricted stock units are reinvested in additional restricted stock units at each dividend payable date. As of December 31, 2005, we had a total of 5.108 million restricted stock units outstanding, with approximately 1.022 million units, before tax withholdings, vesting each year from 2006 through 2010.

 

Nonqualified Stock Options

 

We maintain fixed stock option plans, under which options are granted to purchase shares of UPS Class A common stock. Stock options granted in connection with the Incentive Compensation Plan must have an exercise price at least equal to the NYSE closing price of UPS class B common stock on the date the option was granted.

 

Persons earning the right to receive stock options are determined each year by the Compensation Committee of the UPS Board of Directors.Committee. Except in the case of death, disability, or retirement, options granted under the Incentive Compensation Plan are generally exercisable three to five years from the date of grant and before the expiration of the option 10 years after the date of grant. All options granted are subject to earlier cancellation or exercise under certain conditions.

F-31


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) Options granted to eligible employees will generally be granted annually during the first half of each year at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

 

The following is an analysis of options to purchase shares of Class A common stock issued and outstanding:

 

  2004

 2003

 2002

   2005

 2004

 2003

 
  

Weighted

Average

Price


  

Shares

(in thousands)


 

Weighted

Average

Price


  

Shares

(in thousands)


 

Weighted

Average

Price


  

Shares

(in thousands)


   

Weighted

Average

Price


  

Shares

(in thousands)


 

Weighted

Average

Price


  

Shares

(in thousands)


 

Weighted

Average

Price


  

Shares

(in thousands)


 

Outstanding at beginning of year

  $48.02  22,745  $38.73  27,745  $29.64  29,224   $59.96  17,701  $48.02  22,745  $38.73  27,745 

Exercised

   26.97  (7,351)  18.59  (7,297)  15.91  (6,434)   56.44  (1,325)  26.97  (7,351)  18.59  (7,297)

Granted

   70.70  2,663   62.40  2,860   60.22  5,760    72.18  2,667   70.70  2,663   62.40  2,860 

Forfeited / expired

   58.70  (356)  44.63  (563)  46.08  (805)   67.09  (309)  58.70  (356)  44.63  (563)
     

   

   

     

   

   

Outstanding at end of year

  $59.96  17,701  $48.02  22,745  $38.73  27,745   $61.84  18,734  $59.96  17,701  $48.02  22,745 
     

   

   

     

   

   

 

Beginning in November 1999, options were granted under the Incentive Compensation Plan, and a limited option grantF-31


Index to certain employees under this plan occurred in 2000. Beginning in 2001 and in future years, options to eligible employees will generally be granted annually during the first half of each year at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the UPS Board of Directors.Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2004:2005:

 

   Options Outstanding

  Options Exercisable

Exercise Price Range


  

Shares

(in thousands)


  

Average Life

(in years)


  

Average

Exercise
Price


  

Shares

(in thousands)


  

Average

Exercise
Price


$ 13.94 - $ 50.63

  2,424  4.82  $49.89  2,397  $49.89

$ 56.25 - $ 57.50

  4,467  6.24   56.90  4,467   56.90

$ 59.38 - $ 60.61

  5,381  7.27   60.20  141   59.54

$ 61.88 - $ 65.00

  2,757  8.32   62.41  11   64.20

$ 68.44 - $ 143.13

  2,672  9.23   71.23  48   99.88
   
         
    
   17,701  7.13  $59.96  7,064  $54.88
   
         
    

F-32


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   Options Outstanding

  Options Exercisable

Exercise Price Range


  

Shares

(in thousands)


  

Average Life

(in years)


  

Average

Exercise
Price


  

Shares

(in thousands)


  

Average

Exercise
Price


$ 16.60 - $50.00

  2,052  3.85  $49.90  2,052  $49.90

$ 50.37 - $56.90

  3,953  5.22   56.85  3,953   56.85

$ 57.45 - $60.22

  4,831  6.26   60.19  4,831   60.19

$ 60.38 - $70.70

  5,253  7.81   66.43  28   61.94

$ 71.88 - $116.48

  2,645  9.28   72.43  29   94.85
   
         
    
   18,734  6.64  $61.84  10,893  $57.13
   
         
    

 

Restricted Performance Units

 

Beginning in 2003, we issued restricted performance units under the Incentive Compensation Plan. Upon vesting, restricted performance units result in the issuance of the equivalent number of UPS Class A common shares after required tax withholdings. Persons earning the right to receive restricted performance units are determined each year by the Compensation Committee of the UPS Board of Directors.Committee. Except in the case of death, disability, or retirement, restricted performance units vest five years after the date of grant. All restricted performance units granted are subject to earlier cancellation or vesting under certain conditions. Dividends earned on restricted performance units are reinvested in additional restricted performance units at each dividend payable date. Restricted performance units also allow for bonus shares to be issued, comprising 10% of the original award, if certain company-wide performance goals are attained in the year of vesting. During 2005, 2004, and 2003, the Company issued 1.076, 1.083, and 1.164 million restricted performance units, with a weighted average fair value of $70.70 and $62.40, respectively. As of December 31, 2004,2005, we had the following restricted performance units outstanding:outstanding, including reinvested dividends:

 

Year of Award


  

Units Outstanding

(in thousands)


  

Remaining Vesting

Period (in years)


  

Avg. Fair Value

at Grant Date


  

Units Outstanding

(in thousands)


  

Remaining Vesting

Period (in years)


  

Average Fair Value

at Grant Date


2003

  1,140  3.33  $62.40  1,129  2.33  $62.40

2004

  1,074  4.33   70.70  1,067  3.33   70.70

2005

  1,068  4.33   72.07
  
        
      
  2,214  3.82  $66.43  3,264  3.31  $68.28
  
        
      

 

Discounted Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

We maintain an employee stock purchase plan for all eligible employees. Under the plan, shares of UPS Class A common stock may be purchased at quarterly intervals at 90% of the lower of the NYSE closing price of UPS Class B common stock on the first or the last day of each quarterly period. Employees purchased 2.0, 1.8, 1.9, and 1.81.9 million shares at average prices of $64.54, $62.75, $54.08, and $50.79$54.08 per share during 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002,2003, respectively.

 

Deferred Compensation Obligations

 

We maintain a deferred compensation plan whereby certain employees may elect to defer the gains on stock option exercises by deferring the shares received upon exercise into a rabbi trust. The shares held in this trust are classified as treasury stock, and the liability to participating employees is classified as “Deferred compensation

F-32


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

obligations” in the shareowners’ equity section of the balance sheet. The amount of shares needed to settle the liability for deferred compensation obligations is included in the denominator in both the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations.

 

NOTE 12. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

 

We report our operations in three segments: U.S. domestic packageDomestic Package operations, international packageInternational Package operations, and non-packageSupply Chain & Freight operations. Package operations represent our most significant business and are broken down into regional operations around the world. Regional operations managers are responsible for both domestic and export operations within their geographic area.

 

U.S. Domestic Package

 

Domestic packagePackage operations include the time-definite delivery of letters, documents, and packages throughout the United States.

 

International Package

 

International packagePackage operations include delivery to more than 200 countries and territories worldwide, including shipments wholly outside the United States, as well as shipments with either origin or distribution

F-33


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

outside the United States. Our international packageInternational Package reporting segment includes the operations of our Europe, Asia-Pacific, Canada,Asia, and Americas operating segments.

 

Non-PackageSupply Chain & Freight

 

Non-packageSupply Chain & Freight includes our forwarding services and logistics operations, the operations of Overnite Corp. (acquired August 2005, and now known as UPS Freight), and other aggregated business units. Our forwarding services and logistics business include the operations acquired with the purchase of Menlo Worldwide Forwarding, Inc. (now collectively known as UPS Supply Chain Solutions,Solutions). Forwarding services and logistics includes supply chain design and management, freight distribution and customs brokerage services. UPS Freight offers a variety of less-than-truckload (LTL) and truckload services to customers in North America. Other aggregated business units within this segment include Mail Boxes, Etc. (the franchisor of Mail Boxes, Etc. and The UPS Store), UPS Capital, our mail, consulting and consulting services, and our excess value package insurance business. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, which comprises our former UPS Freight Services and UPS Logistics Group businesses, provides supply chain design and management, freight forwarding, and customs brokerageprofessional services.

 

In evaluating financial performance, we focus on operating profit as a segment’s measure of profit or loss. Operating profit is before investment income, interest expense, and income taxes. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of accounting policies (see Note 1), with certain expenses allocated between the segments using activity-based costing methods. Unallocated assets are comprised primarily of cash, marketable securities, short-term investments, and short-termequity-method real estate investments.

F-33


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Segment information as of, and for the years ended, December 31 is as follows (in millions):

 

   2004

  2003

  2002

Revenue:

            

U.S. domestic package

  $26,610  $25,022  $23,924

International package

   6,762   5,561   4,680

Non-package

   3,210   2,902   2,668
   

  

  

Consolidated

  $36,582  $33,485  $31,272
   

  

  

Operating Profit:

            

U.S. domestic package

  $3,345  $3,272  $3,576

International package

   1,121   709   322

Non-package

   523   464   198
   

  

  

Consolidated

  $4,989  $4,445  $4,096
   

  

  

Assets:

            

U.S. domestic package

  $16,978  $16,271  $15,173

International package

   4,728   4,287   3,271

Non-package

   6,380   6,038   6,245

Unallocated

   4,940   3,138   2,179
   

  

  

Consolidated

  $33,026  $29,734  $26,868
   

  

  

Non-package operating profit included $112, $114, and $112 million for 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, of intersegment profit, with a corresponding amount of operating expense, which reduces operating profit, included in the U.S. domestic package segment.

F-34


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   2005

  2004

  2003

Revenue:

            

U.S. Domestic Package

  $28,610  $26,960  $25,362

International Package

   7,977   6,809   5,609

Supply Chain & Freight

   5,994   2,813   2,514
   

  

  

Consolidated

  $42,581  $36,582  $33,485
   

  

  

Operating Profit:

            

U.S. Domestic Package

  $4,493  $3,702  $3,657

International Package

   1,494   1,149   732

Supply Chain & Freight

   156   138   56
   

  

  

Consolidated

  $6,143  $4,989  $4,445
   

  

  

Assets:

            

U.S. Domestic Package

  $20,781  $18,944  $18,156

International Package

   4,987   4,728   4,287

Supply Chain & Freight

   7,126   4,878   4,498

Unallocated

   2,328   4,538   2,793
   

  

  

Consolidated

  $35,222  $33,088  $29,734
   

  

  

Depreciation and Amortization Expense:

            

U.S. Domestic Package

  $1,005  $971  $993

International Package

   491   465   454

Supply Chain & Freight

   148   107   102
   

  

  

Consolidated

  $1,644  $1,543  $1,549
   

  

  

 

Revenue by product type for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in millions):

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

  2005

  2004

  2003

U.S. domestic package:

         

U.S. Domestic Package:

         

Next Day Air

  $6,040  $5,580  $5,349  $6,381  $6,084  $5,621

Deferred

   3,161   2,982   2,868   3,258   3,193   3,015

Ground

   17,409   16,460   15,707   18,971   17,683   16,726
  

  

  

  

  

  

Total U.S. domestic package

   26,610   25,022   23,924

International package:

         

Total U.S. Domestic Package

   28,610   26,960   25,362

International Package:

         

Domestic

   1,346   1,134   943   1,588   1,346   1,134

Export

   4,944   4,001   3,276   5,856   4,991   4,049

Cargo

   472   426   461   533   472   426
  

  

  

  

  

  

Total International package

   6,762   5,561   4,680

Non-package:

         

UPS Supply Chain Solutions

   2,346   2,126   1,969

Total International Package

   7,977   6,809   5,609

Supply Chain & Freight:

         

Forwarding Services and Logistics

   4,737   2,379   2,126

UPS Freight

   797   —     —  

Other

   864   776   699   460   434   388
  

  

  

  

  

  

Total Non-package

   3,210   2,902   2,668

Total Supply Chain & Freight

   5,994   2,813   2,514
  

  

  

  

  

  

Consolidated

  $36,582  $33,485  $31,272  $42,581  $36,582  $33,485
  

  

  

  

  

  

F-34


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Geographic information as of, and for the years ended, December 31 is as follows (in millions):

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

  2005

  2004

  2003

U.S.:

         

United States:

         

Revenue

  $28,035  $26,968  $26,284  $31,871  $28,035  $26,968

Long-lived assets

  $15,971  $15,634  $14,640  $19,704  $16,033  $15,634

International:

                  

Revenue

  $8,547  $6,517  $4,988  $10,710  $8,547  $6,517

Long-lived assets

  $3,975  $3,567  $2,874  $4,044  $3,975  $3,567

Consolidated:

                  

Revenue

  $36,582  $33,485  $31,272  $42,581  $36,582  $33,485

Long-lived assets

  $19,946  $19,201  $17,514  $23,748  $20,008  $19,201

 

Revenue, for geographic disclosure, is based on the location in which service originates. Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment, prepaid pension costs, long-term investments, goodwill, and intangible assets.

 

NOTE 13. OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES

 

The major components of other operating expenses for the years ended December 31 are as follows (in millions):

 

  2004

  2003

  2002

  2005

  2004

  2003

Repairs and maintenance

  $1,005  $955  $873  $1,097  $1,005  $955

Depreciation and amortization

   1,543   1,549   1,464   1,644   1,543   1,549

Purchased transportation

   2,059   1,828   1,665   4,050   2,059   1,828

Fuel

   1,416   1,050   952   2,085   1,416   1,050

Other occupancy

   752   730   653   872   752   730

Restructuring charge and related expenses

   —     9   106

Other expenses

   3,902   3,591   3,523   4,173   3,995   3,677
  

  

  

  

  

  

  $10,677  $9,712  $9,236  $13,921  $10,770  $9,789
  

  

  

  

  

  

In 2005, we reclassified certain amounts between “other expenses” and “compensation and benefits” expense, related to the capitalization of internally-developed software. Amounts were also reclassified in all prior periods for consistent presentation in our consolidated income statement. The reclassification had the effect of increasing other expenses, and reducing compensation and benefits expense, by $92, $93, and $77 million in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.

 

F-35


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In the fourth quarter of 2002, we initiated a restructuring program to combine UPS Freight Services and the UPS Logistics Group into a single business unit (“UPS Supply Chain Solutions”). In connection with this restructuring program, we also recorded certain costs related to the integration of activities between UPS Capital and First International Bank. The program was designed to facilitate business growth, streamline management decision-making, reduce the cost structure, and provide higher levels of service to our customers. Costs of the program included employee severance costs, asset impairments, costs associated with the consolidation of facilities, and other costs directly related to the restructuring program. As of December 31, 2003, the restructuring program was substantially complete.

 

NOTE 14. INCOME TAXES

 

The income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31 consists of the following (in millions):

 

  2004

 2003

 2002

  2005

 2004

 2003

 

Current:

      

U.S. Federal

  $1,675  $1,103  $1,208  $1,683  $1,675  $1,103 

U.S. State & Local

   71   112   148   176   71   112 

Non-U.S.

   98   86   62   135   98   86 
  


 


 

  


 


 


Total Current

   1,844   1,301   1,418   1,994   1,844   1,301 

Deferred:

      

U.S. Federal

   (155)  181   323   211   (155)  181 

U.S. State & Local

   (84)  (11)  14   6   (84)  (11)

Non-U.S.

   (16)  1   —     (6)  (16)  1 
  


 


 

  


 


 


Total Deferred

   (255)  171   337   211   (255)  171 
  


 


 

  


 


 


Total

  $1,589  $1,472  $1,755  $2,205  $1,589  $1,472 
  


 


 

  


 


 


 

Income before income taxes includes income of foreignnon-U.S. subsidiaries of $337, $270, $237, and $16$237 million in 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002,2003, respectively.

 

A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective income tax rate for the years ended December 31 consists of the following:

 

  2004

 2003

 2002

       2005    

     2004    

     2003    

 

Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate

  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

U.S. state & local income taxes (net of federal benefit)

  1.2  1.5  2.1   2.0  1.2  1.5 

Tax assessment reversal (tax portion)

  —    —    (2.8)

Other

  (3.9) (2.8) 0.7   (0.7) (3.9) (2.8)
  

 

 

  

 

 

Effective income tax rate

  32.3% 33.7% 35.0%  36.3% 32.3% 33.7%
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

During the third quarter of 2004, we recognized a $99 million reduction of income tax expense related to the favorable settlement of various U.S. federal tax contingency matters with the IRS pertaining to tax years 1985 through 1998, and various state and non-U.S. tax contingency matters.

 

During the fourth quarter of 2004, we recognized a $109 million reduction of income tax expense primarily related to the favorable resolution of a U.S. state tax contingency matter, improvements in U.S. state and non-U.S. effective tax rates, and the reversal of valuation allowances associated with certain U.S. state & local and non-U.S. net operating loss and credit carryforwards due to sufficient positive evidence that the related subsidiaries will be profitable and generate taxable income before such carryforwards expire.

F-36


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

During the first quarter of 2003, we recognized a $55 million reduction of income tax expense due to the favorable resolution of several outstanding contingency matters with the IRS. During the third quarter of 2003, we recognized a $22 million credit to income tax expense as a result of a favorable tax court ruling in relation to an outstanding contingency matter with the IRS.

 

After filing our 2002 state tax returns during the fourth quarter of 2003, we completed a review of the taxability of our operations in various U.S. state taxing jurisdictions and the effects of available state tax credits. As a result of this review, we recorded a decrease of $39 million in the income tax provision in the fourth quarter of 2003. This decrease includes a reduction in our estimated state tax liabilities and the effect of the estimated state income tax effective rate applied to our temporary differences.

 

F-36


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Deferred tax liabilities and assets are comprised of the following at December 31 (in millions):

 

  2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 

Property, plant and equipment

  $2,624  $2,453   $2,572  $2,624 

Goodwill and intangible assets

   428   349    491   428 

Pension plans

   1,481   1,266    1,722   1,481 

Other

   167   473    396   167 
  


 


  


 


Gross deferred tax liabilities

   4,700   4,541    5,181   4,700 
  


 


  


 


Other postretirement benefits

   684   588    681   684 

Loss carryforwards (non-U.S. and state)

   113   117 

Loss and credit carryforwards (non-U.S. and state)

   113   135 

Insurance reserves

   469   347    543   469 

Vacation pay accrual

   145   131    154   145 

Other

   471   673    794   471 
  


 


  


 


Gross deferred tax assets

   1,882   1,856    2,285   1,904 

Deferred tax assets valuation allowance

   (64)  (117)   (54)  (86)
  


 


  


 


Net deferred tax assets

   1,818   1,739    2,231   1,818 
  


 


  


 


Net deferred tax liability

   2,882   2,802    2,950   2,882 
  


 


  


 


Current deferred tax asset

   (392)  (316)   (475)  (392)
  


 


  


 


Long-term liability—see Note 9

  $3,274  $3,118   $3,425  $3,274 
  


 


  


 


 

The valuation allowance increased (decreased) by $(53)$(32), $25$(31), and $23$25 million during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, and 2002, respectively. We reclassified $719 million from deferred income taxes to other non-current assets as of December 31, 2003. This amount represents various income tax receivable items that had previously been netted against our deferred tax liabilities.

 

As of December 31, 2004,2005, we have U.S. state & local operating loss and credit carryforwards of approximately $428 million$1.060 billion and $25$40 million, respectively. The operating loss carryforwards expire at varying dates through 2024.2025. The majority of the credit carryforwards may be carried forward indefinitely. We also have non-U.S. loss carryforwards of approximately $874$644 million as of December 31, 2004,2005, the majority of which may be carried forward indefinitely. As indicated in the table above, we have established a valuation allowance for certain non-U.S. and state loss carryforwards, due to the uncertainty resulting from a lack of previous taxable income within the applicable tax jurisdictions.

 

Undistributed earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries amounted to approximately $728 million$1.062 billion at December 31, 2004.2005. Those earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no U.S. federal or state

F-37


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

deferred income taxes have been provided thereon. Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, we would be subject to U.S. income taxes and withholding taxes payable in various non-U.S. jurisdictions, which could potentially be offset by foreign tax credits. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability is not practicable because of the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation.

 

We have not changed our position with respect to the indefinite reinvestment of foreign earnings to take into account the possible election of the repatriation provisions contained in the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, (the “Jobs Act”), as enacted on October 22, 2004, provideswhich provided for a temporary 85% dividends received deduction on certain foreign earnings repatriated during a one-year period. The deduction would resultperiod (expired in December 2005), did not have an approximate 5.25% U.S. federal tax rateimpact on UPS as we did not repatriate any repatriated earnings. To qualify forearnings subject to the deduction, the earnings must be reinvested in the United States pursuant to a domestic reinvestment plan established by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. Certain other criteria in the Jobs Act must be satisfied as well. The maximum amount of our foreign earnings that qualify for the temporary deduction under the Jobs Act is $500 million.Act.

 

We are in the process of evaluating whether we will repatriate foreign earnings under the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Act, and if so, the amount that will be repatriated. We are considering repatriating any amount upF-37


Index to $500 million under the Jobs Act. We are awaiting the issuance of further regulatory guidance and passage of statutory technical corrections with respect to certain provisions in the Jobs Act prior to determining the amounts we could repatriate. We expect to determine the amounts and sources of foreign earnings to be repatriated, if any, during the fourth quarter of 2005. We cannot reasonably estimate the impact of a qualifying repatriation, should we choose to make one, on our income tax expense for 2005 at this time.Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

NOTE 15. EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in millions except per share amounts):

 

   2004

  2003

  2002

Numerator:

            

Net income before the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

  $3,333  $2,898  $3,254
   

  

  

Denominator:

            

Weighted average shares

   1,125   1,125   1,117

Management incentive awards

   1   1   1

Deferred compensation obligations

   3   2   2
   

  

  

Denominator for basic earnings per share

   1,129   1,128   1,120
   

  

  

Effect of dilutive securities:

            

Management incentive awards

   4   4   4

Stock option plans

   4   6   10
   

  

  

Denominator for diluted earnings per share

   1,137   1,138   1,134
   

  

  

Basic earnings per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

  $2.95  $2.57  $2.91
   

  

  

             

Diluted earnings per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

  $2.93  $2.55  $2.87
   

  

  

F-38


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   2005

  2004

  2003

Numerator:

            

Net income

  $3,870  $3,333  $2,898
   

  

  

Denominator:

            

Weighted average shares

   1,110   1,125   1,125

Management incentive awards

   —     1   1

Deferred compensation obligations

   3   3   2
   

  

  

Denominator for basic earnings per share

   1,113   1,129   1,128
   

  

  

Effect of dilutive securities:

            

Management incentive awards

   —     4   4

Restricted performance units

   1   —     —  

Stock option plans

   2   4   6
   

  

  

Denominator for diluted earnings per share

   1,116   1,137   1,138
   

  

  

Basic earnings per share

  $3.48  $2.95  $2.57
   

  

  

Diluted earnings per share

  $3.47  $2.93  $2.55
   

  

  

 

Diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 20022003 exclude the effect of 5.2, 2.7, 2.9, and 0.12.9 million shares, respectively, of common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of employee stock options because such effect would be antidilutive.

 

NOTE 16. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT

 

We are exposed to market risk, primarily related to foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices, and interest rates. These exposures are actively monitored by management. To manage the volatility relating to certain of these exposures, we enter into a variety of derivative financial instruments. Our objective is to reduce, where it is deemed appropriate to do so, fluctuations in earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency rates, commodity prices, equity prices, and interest rates. It is our policy and practice to use derivative financial instruments only to the extent necessary to manage exposures. As we use price sensitive instruments to hedge a certain portion of our existing and anticipated transactions, we expect that any loss in value for those instruments generally would be offset by increases in the value of those hedged transactions.

 

We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

 

Commodity Price Risk Management

 

We are exposed to an increase in the prices of refined fuels, principally jet-A, diesel, and unleaded gasoline. Additionally, we are exposed to an increase in the prices of other energy products, principally natural gas and electricity. We use a combination of options, swaps, and futures contracts to provide partial protection from rising fuel and energy prices. The net fair value of such contracts subject to price risk, excluding the underlying exposures, as of December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 was an asset of $101$192 and $30$101 million, respectively. We have designated and account for these contracts as cash flow hedges, and, therefore, the resulting gains and losses from these hedges are recognized as a component of fuel expense or other occupancy expense when the underlying fuel or energy product being hedged is consumed.

F-38


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk Management

 

We have foreign currency risks related to our revenue, operating expenses, and financing transactions in currencies other than the local currencies in which we operate. We are exposed to currency risk from the potential changes in functional currency values of our foreign currency denominated assets, liabilities, and cash flows. Our most significant foreign currency exposures relate to the Euro, the British Pound Sterling, and the Canadian Dollar. We use a combination of purchased and written options and forward contracts to hedge currency cash flow exposures. As of December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, the net fair value of the hedging instruments described above was a liabilityan asset (liability) of $(28)$52 and $(48)$(28) million, respectively. We have designated and account for these contracts as cash flow hedges of anticipated foreign currency denominated revenue and, therefore, the resulting gains and losses from these hedges are recognized as a component of international package revenue when the underlying sales occur.

 

Interest Rate Risk Management

 

Our indebtedness under our various financing arrangements creates interest rate risk. We use a combination of derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps, as part of our program to manage the fixed and floating interest rate mix of our total debt portfolio and related overall cost of borrowing. These swaps are entered into concurrently with the issuance of the debt that they are intended to modify, and the notional amount, interest payment, and maturity dates of the swaps match the terms of the associated debt. Interest rate swaps allow us to maintain a target range of floating rate debt.

 

F-39


UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

We have designated and account for these contracts as either hedges of the fair value of the associated debt instruments, or as hedges of the variability in expected future interest payments. Any periodic settlement payments are accrued monthly, as either a charge or credit to interest expense, and are not material to net income. The net fair value of our interest rate swaps at December 31, 20042005 and 20032004 was a liability of $(32)$(47) and $(27)$(32) million, respectively.

 

Credit Risk Management

 

The forward contracts, swaps, and options previously discussed contain an element of risk that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the agreements. However, we minimize such risk exposures for these instruments by limiting the counterparties to large banks and financial institutions that meet established credit guidelines. We do not expect to incur any losses as a result of counterparty default.

 

Derivatives Not Designated As Hedges

 

Derivatives not designated as hedges primarily consist of a small portfolio of stock warrants in public and private companies that are held for investment purposes. These warrants are recorded at fair value, and the impact of these warrants on our results was immaterial for 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002.2003.

 

Income Effects of Derivatives

 

In the context of hedging relationships, “effectiveness” refers to the degree to which fair value changes in the hedging instrument offset corresponding changes in the hedged item. Certain elements of hedge positions cannot qualify for hedge accounting under FAS 133 whether effective or not, and must therefore be marked to market through income. Both the effective and ineffective portions of gains and losses on hedges are reported in the income statement category related to the hedged exposure. Both the ineffective portion of hedge positions and the elements excluded from the measure of effectiveness were immaterial for 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002.2003.

F-39


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

As of December 31, 2004, $132005, $64 million in lossesgains related to cash flow hedges that are currently deferred in OCI are expected to be reclassified to income over the 12 month period ending December 31, 2005.2006. The actual amounts that will be reclassified to income over the next 12 months will vary from this amount as a result of changes in market conditions. No amounts were reclassified to income during 20042005 in connection with forecasted transactions that were no longer considered probable of occurring.

 

At December 31, 2004,2005, the maximum term of derivative instruments that hedge forecasted transactions, except those related to cross-currency interest rate swaps on existing financial instruments, was threetwo years. We maintain cross-currency interest rate swaps that extend through 2009.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

At December 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, our financial instruments included cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and short-term investments, accounts receivable, finance receivables, accounts payable, short-term and long-term borrowings, and commodity, interest rate, foreign currency, and equity options, forwards, and swaps. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of our marketable securities and short-term investments is disclosed in Note 2, finance receivables in Note 3, and debt instruments in Note 8.

 

NOTE 17. MENLO RESTRUCTURING PROGRAM AND RELATED EXPENSES

In February 2005, we announced our intention to transfer operations currently taking place at the Menlo Worldwide Forwarding facility in Dayton, Ohio to other UPS facilities over approximately 12 to 18 months. This action is being taken to remove redundancies between the Menlo Worldwide Forwarding and existing UPS transportation networks, and thus provide efficiencies and better leverage the current UPS facilities in the movement of air freight. During the third quarter of 2005, we finalized our plans to exit the Dayton facility, as well as various other Menlo Worldwide Forwarding facilities, and accrued certain costs related to employee severance, lease terminations, and related items. As part of this program, the recorded value of the Dayton facility was reduced to its fair market value as of the date of the acquisition. These accrued costs, and related reductions in the fair value of recorded assets, resulted in an adjustment to the amount of goodwill initially recorded in the Menlo Worldwide Forwarding acquisition.

The total cost of the program is estimated at $229 million, of which $160 million resulted in an adjustment of the purchase price allocation of Menlo Worldwide Forwarding. The remaining $69 million of the total program cost relates to integration activities, such as employee relocations, the moving of inventory and fixed assets, and the consolidation of information systems, and are therefore being expensed as incurred. The program will be completed by the end of 2006.

Set forth below is a summary of activity related to the restructuring program and resulting liability for 2005 (in millions):

   Employee
Severance


  Asset
Impairment


  Facility
Consolidation


  Other

  Total

 

Balance at January 1, 2005

  $—    $—    $—    $—    $—   

Costs accrued

   31   56   48   25   160 

Cash spent

   (7)  —     (1)  —     (8)

Charges against assets

   —     (56)  —     —     (56)
   


 


 


 

  


Balance at December 31, 2005

  $24  $—    $47  $25  $96 
   


 


 


 

  


F-40


Index to Financial Statements

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Employee Severance

Employee severance costs relate to severance packages for approximately 550 people. The packages are involuntary and are formula-driven based on salary levels and past service. The current and planned separations span the entire business unit, including the operations, information technology, finance, and business development functions.

Asset Impairment

Asset impairment charges result from establishing new carrying values for assets that have been or will be abandoned. Impaired assets consist primarily of the Menlo Worldwide Forwarding facility in Dayton, Ohio, which we plan to close by June 2006. Other impaired assets include capitalized software that is redundant with existing UPS software, and will thus no longer be used.

Facility Consolidation

Facility consolidation costs are associated with terminating operating leases on offices, warehouses, and other Menlo Worldwide Forwarding facilities.

Other Costs

Other costs consist primarily of costs associated with the termination of certain Menlo Worldwide Forwarding legal entities and joint ventures, as well as environmental remediation costs.

NOTE 17.18. QUARTERLY INFORMATION (unaudited)

 

   First Quarter

  Second Quarter

  Third Quarter

  Fourth Quarter

   2004

  2003

  2004

  2003

  2004

  2003

  2004

  2003

Revenue:

                                

U.S. domestic package

  $6,540  $6,020  $6,480  $6,124  $6,494  $6,219  $7,096  $6,659

International package

   1,619   1,302   1,613   1,371   1,666   1,370   1,864   1,518

Non-package

   760   693   778   731   792   723   880   755
   

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total revenue

   8,919   8,015   8,871   8,226   8,952   8,312   9,840   8,932

Operating profit:

                                

U.S. domestic package

   831   704   892   832   857   825   765   911

International package

   269   134   272   158   262   176   318   241

Non-package

   117   107   146   90   139   146   121   121
   

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total operating profit

   1,217   945   1,310   1,080   1,258   1,147   1,204   1,273

Net income

  $759  $611  $818  $692  $890  $739  $866  $856
   

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Earnings per share:

                                

Basic

  $0.67  $0.54  $0.73  $0.61  $0.79  $0.66  $0.77  $0.76

Diluted

  $0.67  $0.54  $0.72  $0.61  $0.78  $0.65  $0.76  $0.75

First quarter 2003 net income reflects a charge for an impairment of investments ($37 million after-tax, $0.03 per diluted share) and a credit to tax expense upon the resolution of various tax contingencies ($55 million, $0.05 per diluted share). Second quarter 2003 net income was impacted by the gain on the sale of Mail Technologies ($14 million after-tax, $0.01 per diluted share). Third quarter 2003 net income reflects the gain on sale of Aviation Technologies ($15 million after-tax, $0.01 per diluted share) and the credit to tax expense from a favorable ruling on the tax treatment of jet engine maintenance costs ($22 million, $0.02 per diluted share). Fourth quarter 2003 net income was impacted by a gain on the redemption of long-term debt ($18 million after-tax, $0.02 per diluted share) and a credit to income tax expense for a lower effective state tax rate ($39 million, $0.03 per diluted share).

   First Quarter

  Second Quarter

  Third Quarter

  Fourth Quarter

   2005

  2004

  2005

  2004

  2005

  2004

  2005

  2004

Revenue:

                                

U.S. Domestic Package

  $6,811  $6,625  $6,942  $6,567  $7,033  $6,581  $7,824  $7,187

International Package

   1,842   1,630   1,997   1,627   1,918   1,675   2,220   1,877

Supply Chain & Freight

   1,233   664   1,252   677   1,599   696   1,910   776
   

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total revenue

   9,886   8,919   10,191   8,871   10,550   8,952   11,954   9,840

Operating profit:

                                

U.S. Domestic Package

   1,028   912   1,118   988   1,110   941   1,237   861

International Package

   348   277   397   281   318   266   431   325

Supply Chain & Freight

   9   28   34   41   70   51   43   18
   

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Total operating profit

   1,385   1,217   1,549   1,310   1,498   1,258   1,711   1,204

Net income

  $882  $759  $986  $818  $953  $890  $1,049  $866
   

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Earnings per share:

                                

Basic

  $0.78  $0.67  $0.88  $0.73  $0.86  $0.79  $0.95  $0.77

Diluted

  $0.78  $0.67  $0.88  $0.72  $0.86  $0.78  $0.95  $0.76

 

Third quarter 2004 net income includes a credit to tax expense ($99 million, $0.09 per diluted share) related to the resolution of various tax matters. Fourth quarter 2004 net income includes an impairment charge ($70 million after-tax, $0.06 per diluted share) on Boeing 727, 747, and McDonnell Douglas DC-8 aircraft, and related engines and parts, and a charge to pension expense ($40 million after-tax, $0.04 per diluted share) resulting from the consolidation of data collection systems. Fourth quarter 2004 net income also includes credits to income tax expense ($43 million, $0.04 per diluted share) related to various items, including the resolution of certain tax matters, the removal of a portion of the valuation allowances on certain deferred tax assets on net operating loss carryforwards, and an adjustment for identified tax contingency items.

 

F-41


Index to Financial Statements

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit

No.


   

Description


2.1  Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 22, 1999, among United Parcel Service of America, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc. and UPS Merger Subsidiary, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the registration statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-83349), filed on July 21, 1999, as amended).
2.2Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 15, 2005, among United Parcel Service, Inc., Overnite Corporation, and Olympic Merger Sub, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, filed on May 18, 2005).
3.1  Form of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of United Parcel Service, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23.1 to Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2002).
3.2  Form of Bylaws of United Parcel Service, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the registration statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-83349), filed on July 21, 1999, as amended).
4.1  Form of Class A Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registration statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-83349), filed on July 21, 1999, as amended).
4.2  Form of Class B Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the registration statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-83349), filed on July 21, 1999).
4.3  Specimen Certificate of 8 3/8% 3/8% Debentures due April 1, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to Registration Statement No. 33-32481, filed December 7, 1989).
4.4  Indenture relating to 8 3/8% 3/8% Debentures due April 1, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to Registration Statement No. 33-32481, filed December 7, 1989).
4.5  Specimen Certificate of 8 3/8% 3/8% Debentures due April 1, 2030 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit T-3C to Form T-3 filed December 18, 1997).
4.6  Indenture relating to Exchange Offer Notes Due 2030 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit T-3C to Form T-3 filed December 18, 1997).
4.7  Indenture relating to $2,000,000,000 of debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-08369), filed on January 26, 1999).
4.8  Form of Supplemental Indenture relating to $2,000,000,000 of debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-08369-01), filed on March 15, 2000).
4.9  Form of Second Supplemental Indenture relating to $2,000,000,000 of debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2001).
4.10  Form of Indenture relating to $2,000,000,000 of debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-108272), filed on August 27, 2003).
4.11  Underwriting Agreement relating to 1.75% Cash-Settled Convertible Senior Notes due September 27, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2000).
4.12  Form of Underwriting Agreement relating to $2,000,000,000 of debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-108272), filed on August 27, 2003).
4.13  Selling Agent Agreement relating to UPS Notes with maturities of 9 months or more from date of issue (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Form 8-K filed September 12, 2003) and Form of Note (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed September 12, 2003).


Index to Financial Statements

Exhibit

No.


   

Description


10.1  UPS Thrift Plan, as Amended and Restated, including Amendment Nos. 1 through 24 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K). (1) Amendment No. 25 to the UPS Thrift Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(1) to 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K).
10.2  UPS Retirement Plan (including Amendment Nos. 1-4) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 9 to 1979 Annual Report on Form 10-K).
    

(1)    Amendment No. 5 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 20(a) to 1980 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(2)    Amendment No. 6 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 19(a) to 1983 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(3)    Amendment No. 7 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(3) to 1984 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(4)    Amendment No. 8 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(4) to 1985 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(5)    Amendment No. 9 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(5) to 1985 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(6)    Amendment No. 10 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 19(a) to 1988 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(7)    Amendment No. 11 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 19(b) to 1988 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(8)    Amendment No. 12 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) (8) to 1989 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(9)    Amendment No. 13 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10(b) (9) to 1989 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(10)  Amendment No. 14 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(10) to 1990 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(11)  Amendment No. 15 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(11) to 1992 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(12)  Amendment No. 16 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(12) to 1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(13)  Amendment No. 17 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(13) to 1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(14)  Amendment No. 18 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(14) to 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(15)  Amendment No. 19 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(15) to 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(16)  Amendment No. 20 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(16) to 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(17)  Amendment No. 21 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(17) to 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(18)  Amendment No. 22 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(18) to 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K).


Index to Financial Statements

Exhibit

No.


   

Description


    

(19)  Amendment No. 23 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(19) to 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(20)  Amendment No. 24 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(20) to 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(21)  Amendment No. 25 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)(20) to 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(22)  Amendment No. 26 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(22) to 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(23)  Amendment No. 27 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(23) to 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(24)  Amendment No. 28 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(24) to 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

(25)  Amendment No. 29 to the UPS Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2005).

†(26) Amendment No. 30 to the UPS Retirement Plan.
†(27) Amendment No. 31 to the UPS Retirement Plan.
†(28) Amendment No. 32 to the UPS Retirement Plan.
†(29) Amendment No. 33 to the UPS Retirement Plan.
10.3  UPS Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated, including Restatement Amendment Nos. 1 through 8 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K).
    

(1)    Amendment No. 1 to the UPS Savings Plan.Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3(1) to 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(2)    Amendment No. 2 to the UPS Savings Plan.Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3(2) to 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

(3)    Amendment No. 3 to the UPS Savings Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2005).

10.4  Credit Agreement (364-Day Facility), as amended and restated, dated April 22, 200421, 2005 among United Parcel Service, Inc., the initial lenders named therein, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. as Arranger,Joint Arrangers, Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC, and Bank One, NABNP Paribas as Co-Documentation Agents and Citibank, N.A. as Administrative Agent and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Syndication Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1010.1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2004)2005).
10.5  Amendment No. 1 to amended and restated Credit Agreement (364-Day Facility) dated December 29, 2003 among United Parcel Service, Inc., the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders named therein, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Bank of America, N.A. and Bank One, NA as Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K).
10.6Credit Agreement (Five-Year Facility) dated April 24, 200321, 2005 among United Parcel Service, Inc., the initial lenders named therein, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. as Arranger,Joint Arrangers, Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC, and Bank One, NA,BNP Paribas, as Co-Documentation Agents and Citibank, N.A. as Administrative Agent and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Syndication Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b)10.2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2003)2005).
10.7Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement (Five-Year Facility) dated December 29, 2003 among United Parcel Service, Inc., the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders named therein, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Bank of America, N.A. and Bank One, NA as Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K).
10.810.6  UPS Excess Coordinating Benefit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K).
10.910.7  UPS 1996 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K).


Index to Financial Statements
  10.10

Exhibit

No.


Description


10.8 ��UPS Qualified Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-67479, filed November 18, 1998).
    

(1)    Amendment No. 1 to the UPS Qualified Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19(1) to 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K).


Exhibit

No.


Description


    

(2)    Amendment No. 2 to the UPS Qualified Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19(2) to 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(3)    Amendment No. 3 to the UPS Qualified Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19(3) to 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(4)    Amendment No. 4 to the UPS Qualified Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19(4) to 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(5)    Amendment No. 5 to the UPS Qualified Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8(5) to 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(6)    Amendment No. 6 to the UPS Qualified Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8(6) to 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(7)    Amendment No. 7 to the UPS Qualified Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8(7) to 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(8)    Amendment No. 8 to the UPS Qualified Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10(8) to 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

    

(9)    Amendment No. 9 to the UPS Qualified Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10(9) to 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

 10.11

(10)  Amendment No. 10 to the UPS Qualified Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2005).

10.9  Form of United Parcel Service, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to the registration statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-83349), filed on July 21, 1999, as amended).
    

(1)    Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement and Restricted Performance Unit Award Agreement.Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11(1) to 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

 10.12

(2)    Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2005).

(3)    Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Performance Awards (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed March 7, 2006).

10.10  UPS Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K).
    

(1)    Amendment to the UPS Deferred Compensation Plan.Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12(1) to 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

   10.1310.11  United Parcel Service, Inc. Nonqualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-34054), filed on April 5, 2000.
   10.1410.12  Form of United Parcel Service, Inc. Discounted Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to Definitive Proxy Statement for 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareowners).

†(1) Amendment to the Discounted Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

†12  Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.


Index to Financial Statements

Exhibit

No.


Description


†21  Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
†23  Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
  †31.1  Certificate of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  †31.2  Certificate of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  †32.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  †32.2  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Filed herewith.